Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptors in the Frog Xenopus laevis: Two AhR1 Paralogs Exhibit Low Affinity for 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-Dioxin (TCDD)

Jeremy A. Lavine, Ashley J. Rowatt, Tatyana Klimova, Aric J. Whitington, Emelyne Dengler, Catherine Beck and Wade H. Powell1

Biology Department, Kenyon College, Gambier, Ohio 43022

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at Biology Department, Kenyon College, 302A College Park St., Fischman Wing 202, Gambier, OHIO 43022. Fax: 740–427–5741. E-mail: powellw{at}kenyon.edu.

Received May 17, 2005; accepted June 2, 2005


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) is a potent developmental toxicant in most vertebrates. However, frogs are relatively insensitive to TCDD toxicity, especially during early life stages. Toxicity of TCDD and related halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons is mediated by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), and specific differences in properties of the AhR signaling pathway can underlie in TCDD toxicity in different species. This study investigated the role of AhR in frog TCDD insensitivity, using Xenopus laevis as a model system. X. laevis, a pseudotetraploid species, expresses two distinct AhR1 genes, AhR1{alpha} and AhR1ß. Sharing 86% amino acid identity, these likely represent distinct genes, both orthologous to mammalian AhR and paralogous to the AhR2 gene(s) in most fish. Both AhR1{alpha} and AhR1ß exhibit TCDD-dependent binding of cognate DNA sequences, but they bind TCDD with at least 20-fold lower affinity than the mouse AhRb–1 protein, and they are similarly less responsive in TCDD-induced reporter gene induction in conjunction with the mouse CYP1A1 promoter. Furthermore, CYP1A6 and CYP1A7 induction by TCDD in cultured X. laevis A6 cells appears much less responsive than CYP1A induction in cell lines derived from more sensitive animals. Taken together, these data suggest that low affinity binding by X. laevis AhRs plays an important mechanistic role in the insensitivity of frogs to TCDD. An understanding of these molecular mechanisms should aid amphibian ecotoxicology and refine the use of frog embryos as a model [e.g. in FETAX (Frog Embryo Teratogenesis Assay-Xenopus)] for determining developmental toxicity of samples containing dioxin-like compounds.

Key Words: aryl hydrocarbon receptors; TCDD; Xenopus laevis; FETAX.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons (HAH), including polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofurans, and biphenyls, are widespread environmental contaminants. The ubiquitous distribution of these compounds makes exposure of many species commonplace, and their lipophilic nature causes accumulation in animal and human tissues (Jensen, 1987Go; Rappe et al., 1991Go). Many HAH compounds cause developmental toxicity (reviewed in Peterson et al., 1993Go). 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) is typically the most potent HAH for most species and experimental endpoints (reviewed in van den Berg et al., 1998Go). In rodents, prenatal TCDD exposure is associated with numerous teratogenic effects, including cleft palate, hydronephrosis, subcutaneous edema, hemorrhage, and mortality (reviewed in Birnbaum, 1991Go; Couture et al., 1990Go; Peterson et al., 1993Go). Recent studies in fish (Belair et al., 2001Go; Elonen et al., 1998Go; Henry et al., 1997Go; Johnson et al., 1998Go; Teraoka et al., 2002Go; Zabel et al., 1995Go) and birds (Ivnitski et al., 2001Go; Walker and Catron, 2000Go) highlight the importance of cardiovascular toxicity, manifested as pericardial edema, cardiac malformations, reduced cardiac function, and inhibited definitive erythropoiesis.

Compared to other vertebrate groups, HAH effects in amphibians are poorly characterized. However, several studies suggest that ranid frogs exhibit substantial insensitivity to TCDD toxicity during both early development (Beatty et al., 1976Go; Jung and Walker, 1997Go) and adult life stages (Beatty et al., 1976Go). Jung and Walker (1997)Go estimated that embryos and tadpoles of green frogs (Rana clamitans), leopard frogs (Rana pipiens), and American toads (Bufo americanus) are 100 to 1000-fold less sensitive to TCDD-induced lethality than most fish species. Like ranid frogs, embryos of Xenopus laevis (African clawed frog; family Pipidae) suffer little mortality following acute exposure to TCDD (Dell'Orto et al., 1998Go; Jung and Walker, 1997Go) or polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) mixtures (Gutleb et al., 1999Go, 2000Go). Some studies report measurable, HAH-induced changes in sublethal endpoints, including increased edema (Sakamoto et al., 1995Go), anemia, and erythrocyte apoptosis (Sakamoto et al., 1997Go), as well as delayed increases in mortality (Gutleb et al., 1999Go), reduced rate of metamorphosis, and increased incidence of tail deformities (Fisher et al., 2003Go). However, the most frequent and severe effects resulted only from long-term, high-level exposures, beginning at least 2 weeks after fertilization, consistent with reduced overall sensitivity to HAH exposure relative to fishes.

Most (if not all) biological effects of dioxin-like HAH compounds are mediated by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), a ligand-activated transcription factor from the basic helix-loop-helix/PAS family of proteins (Gu et al., 2000Go). Following ligand binding in the cytosol, the AhR protein translocates to the nucleus, dissociates from a complex of chaperone proteins, and forms a heterodimer with the ARNT (aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator) protein (Hoffman et al., 1991Go). This transcriptionally active complex binds cis-acting DNA elements (xenobiotic response elements; XREs) and alters the expression of target genes (reviewed in Hankinson, 1995Go; Schmidt and Bradfield, 1996Go). The AhR complex may also cause changes in gene expression patterns through complex interactions with other signaling pathways (reviewed in Carlson and Perdew, 2002Go; Puga et al., 2002Go). AhR-mediated changes in gene expression are thought to play a mechanistic role in HAH toxicity. cDNA microarray studies have documented changes in the expression of hundreds of genes in cultured human hepatoma cells exposed to TCDD; these include mRNAs regulated both directly and indirectly by AhR signaling (Frueh et al., 2001Go; Puga et al., 2000bGo). The best-characterized AhR-regulated gene is cytochrome P4501A1 (CYP1A1), which is strongly induced (reviewed in Hankinson 1995Go; Schmidt and Bradfield, 1996Go). Numerous studies in animals (including mammals, birds, and fish) and cell lines emphasize that properties of the AhR signaling pathway—specifically the expression or functional properties of the AhR itself—often underlie the wide variations in HAH sensitivity observed in different animal groups (reviewed in Hahn, 1998Go).

We are using X. laevis as a model system for probing the mechanistic role of AhR function in the HAH insensitivity of developing frogs. X. laevis is of particular interest because of its widespread use as a general model of vertebrate development. It is also used in FETAX (Frog embryo teratogenesis assay–Xenopus) and similar bioassays of the developmental toxicity of chemicals, mixtures, and environmental samples (ASTM, 1998Go; Bantle, 1996Go). X. laevis is known to have an active AhR signaling pathway, including two CYP1A genes (Fujita et al., 1999Go), two ARNT genes (Bollerot et al., 2001Go; Rowatt et al., 2003Go), and an AhR (Ohi et al., 2003Go). We report the identification of a second AhR paralog (AhR1{alpha}) and characterize the expression patterns and TCDD-responsiveness of both AhRs. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of TCDD insensitivity in developing frogs is important for determining the human health relevance of frog embryo toxicity assays such as FETAX. Moreover, the unique features of frog AhR signaling—including gene number and orthology, expression patterns, and function during embryogenesis and metamorphosis—may ultimately provide a novel perspective on the relationship between the mechanisms of TCDD toxicity and the endogenous functions of AhRs during vertebrate development.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals and RNA isolation.
Xenopus laevis and X. tropicalis frogs were purchased from Xenopus Express (Plant City, FL) and Nasco (Fort Atkinson, WI). Adults were injected with human chorionic gonadotropin (Sigma) and allowed to breed in plastic chambers as described elsewhere (Dawson et al., 1992Go). Embryos were recovered, de-jellied in 2% cysteine, sorted for viability, and maintained in FETAX solution at 24°C throughout the collection period (ASTM, 1998Go). Developing animals were collected at different developmental stages (Nieuwkoop and Faber, 1994Go). Total RNA was isolated using RNA STAT-60 (Tel-Test, Inc.).

Oligonucleotide primers.
Primers were synthesized by Qiagen/Operon and used as described below.

cDNA cloning and plasmid construction.
Initially, partial cDNAs encoding both X. laevis and X. tropicalis AhRs were amplified from stage 46 total RNA using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with degenerate primers Qf and AhR-B1, as described previously (Hahn et al., 1997Go). The 5' and 3' end sequences of the X. laevis cDNAs were determined by RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends) PCR (Frohman et al., 1988Go), using the SMART RACE cDNA amplification kit and Advantage HF-2 PCR (Clontech). For 5' RACE of AhR1{alpha}, the gene-specific primer sequence was: 5'-CAGATTGCTGGAAACCCAGGTAG-3'; for 3' RACE: 5'-AGAAAGGGAAAGATGGGTCCACG'-3'. For 5' RACE reactions of AhR1ß, the primer sequences was 5'-AGCTAACACCTGAGTCTAAGCACG-3'; and for 3' RACE, 5'-GCAGAGCAAGACAGATGGTAACGGC-3'. Finally, cDNAs containing the entire open reading frames of the X. laevis AhRs were amplified using Platinum Pfx DNA polymerase (Invitrogen) and cloned into pCMVTNT (Promega). A single clone corresponded to the amino acid sequence encoded by each AhR contiguous sequence, a finding that was verified by sequencing each position in at least three individual clones.

Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis.
Multiple alignments of the indicated amino acid sequences were performed with CLUSTAL-X (Thompson et al., 1997Go). Aligned amino acid sequences comprising the well-conserved PAS domain were used to construct phylogenetic trees by maximum parsimony (PAUP 4.0b10 [Swofford, 1998Go]) and the Neighbor-Joining (NJ) algorithm (Saitou and Nei, 1987Go). Alignment positions with gaps were excluded. Bootstrap analysis (Felsenstein, 1985Go) was performed to assess relative confidence in the topologies.

Semi-quantitative RT-PCR.
Expression of AhR, ARNT, and CYP1A mRNAs was assessed in adult organs, at various developmental stages, and in A6 cells via RT-PCR, essentially as described previously (Powell et al., 2000Go; Rowatt et al., 2003Go). Total RNA was treated with DNase I (DNA-free; Ambion) to eliminate contamination by genomic DNA and reverse transcribed to cDNA using Omniscript reverse transcriptase (Qiagen) primed by random hexamers (2.5 µM). Aliquots of the reverse transcription reactions (cDNA from 225 ng total RNA) were used as templates for PCR with specific primers for (0.15 µM each). The linear range of detection for the various PCR products was determined by varying the cycle number from 25 to 45 in 3-cycle increments and measuring relative band intensities on 2% agarose gels with a ChemImager 4000 low-light imaging system (Alpha Innotech) with automatic background subtraction (data not shown). Cycling conditions were: 94°C, 15 s; 50°, 30 s; 68°, 1 min for 28 cycles. Primer sequences for AhR1{alpha} were 5'-CCCTTCAATCCTGGAGATACGAA-3' and 5'-GGCTTTCTCCATTCCTTGTGCTTC-3'; for AhR1ß, 5'-TCTACGGCGAGAAAAAGGAGC-3' and 5'-GAGGCAACCACCAAGACAAATCC-3'; and for ß-actin, 5'-GCACCCCTGAATCCTAAAGC-3' and 5'-CAATGATGAAGAAGAGGCAGC-3'. Primer sequences for amplifying CYP1A6 were 5'-CAGTATGGACTAACAATG-3' and 5'-GGTAGAGAGACAATGATC-3'; for CYP1A7, 5'-CAGTATGGACTAACAATG-3' and 5'-CAATGATGAAGAAGAGGCAGC-3'. In experiments to detect CYP1A transcripts, only 25 cycles were employed.

In vitro protein synthesis.
TNT Quick Coupled Reticulocyte Lysate Systems (Promega) were used according to the manufacturer's directions to synthesize unlabeled or 35S-labeled proteins in 25 µl reactions. Aliquots of the TNT reactions were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), followed by fluorography (using Amplify [Amersham]) and autoradiography. Mouse AhR (high affinity, b-1 allele; Burbach et al., 1992Go) and human ARNT were synthesized in the same fashion using pSPORTAhR and pSPORTARNT, gifts from Dr. C. A. Bradfield (University of Wisconsin).

Cytosolic extracts.
Cytosolic extracts were prepared from pools of whole embryos or tadpoles (5 to 50 animals) according to the method of Hahn et al. (1993)Go. Briefly, flash-frozen tadpoles were powdered under liquid nitrogen, dissolved in MEDMG buffer (25 mM MOPS, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 20 mM Na2MoO4, 0.02% NaN3, 10% glycerol 1 mM DTT) containing protease inhibitors (20 µM tosyl-L phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone), 5 µg/ml leupeptin, 100 U/ml aprotinin, 7 µg/ml pepstatin A, and 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and homogenized. Homogenates were centrifuged at 750 x g, 12,000 x g, and 100,000 x g, and the final supernatant was frozen in liquid nitrogen.

Western blotting.
25 µg of cytosolic protein or 2 µl of a TNT reaction were subjected to SDS-PAGE and blotted to nitrocellulose. Blots were probed with dilution of a monoclonal antibody SA210 (Biomol; 300 µg/ml), directed against the N-terminal half of mouse AhR (Pollenz et al., 1994Go).

Electrophoretic mobility shift assay.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays were performed as described previously (Karchner et al., 1999Go; Powell et al., 1999Go), using proteins synthesized in TNT reactions. Prior to protein synthesis, TNT lysates were extracted with dextran-coated charcoal (DCC; 1.0 mg/ml Norit N decolorizing charcoal [Fisher]); 0.1 mg/ml dextran [Sigma] in MEDG), as described previously to reduce specific, background binding to the xenobiotic response element (XRE) probe (Karchner et al., 1999Go; Powell et al., 1999Go).

Velocity sedimentation analysis.
Specific TCDD binding was detected by velocity sedimentation on sucrose gradients in a vertical tube rotor using 1,6-3H-TCDD [33.1 Ci/mmol; >99% radiopurity; Chemsyn (Lenexa, KS)] as described previously (Karchner et al., 1999Go). Mouseb–1 and frog AhRs were synthesized in TNT reactions, diluted 1:2 in MEDMG buffer (25 mM MOPS, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 20 mM Na2MoO4, 0.02% NaN3, 10% glycerol 1 mM DTT), split into two 100-µl aliquots, and incubated for 18 h at 4°C with 4 nM 3H-TCDD. Nonspecific binding was determined by reactions containing an empty vector (unprogrammed lysate [UPL]).

Saturation binding analysis.
The binding affinity of X. laevis AhRs was measured in DCC-based saturation binding assays modified from Poland et al. (1976)Go and Jensen and Hahn (2001)Go. Mouseb–1 and frog AhRs were synthesized in TNT reactions, diluted 1:4 in MEDG buffer (25 mM MOPS, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 0.02% NaN3, 10% glycerol 1 mM DTT), and incubated with graded concentrations of 3H-TCDD in DMSO for 2.5 h at 4°C in glass test tubes. Next, 5-µl aliquots were taken from each mixture to measure the actual concentrations of 3H-TCDD in each tube. Duplicate 30-µl aliquots were then mixed with 30 µl of DCC in polypropylene tubes. Tubes were vortexed briefly three times and incubated on ice for 5 min between each vortexing. The DCC was pelleted by centrifugation for 5 min at 12,000 x g. Bound 3H-TCDD was measured in 50 µl of each supernatant. Total and bound radioactivity were measured directly with a Beckman LS6500 scintillation counter. The concentration of free 3H-TCDD was determined by subtracting the bound concentration of 3H-TCDD from the total concentration.

Nonspecific binding was measured in unprogrammed TNT lysates, plotted against the concentration of free 3H-TCDD, and fit to a linear equation. This equation was used to calculate the predicted nonspecific binding in reactions containing AhR proteins at each free 3H-TCDD concentration. Specific binding was determined by subtracting the calculated nonspecific binding from the total binding measured in each reaction. Specific binding data were fit by nonlinear regression to the equation describing the Langmuir binding isotherm (Kenakin, 1999Go). Curve fits and statistics were accomplished using GraphPad Prism version 4.

Transactivation assays.
The TCDD-dependent transcriptional activity of each AhR was measured in luciferase reporter gene assays using COS-7 monkey kidney cells (ATCC; Manassas, VA) co-transfected with pGudLuc 6.1 (XRE-containing firefly luciferase reporter; Garrison et al., 1996Go; Long et al., 1998Go), pRL-TK (Renilla luciferase transfection control; Promega), and AhR and ARNT expression constructs, essentially as described previously (Karchner et al., 2002Go). Transfections were carried out 24 h after plating 30,000 cells in triplicate wells of a 48-well plate. For each well, a total of 300 ng of DNA was complexed with 1 µl of Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). The amounts of transfected AhR and ARNT DNA were adjusted to optimize the fold-inducibility of pGudLuc6.1 over basal reporter expression. AhR1{alpha} and AhR1ß cDNAs were in pCMVTNT, while mouse AhR and human ARNT were in pSPORT (gifts from Dr. C. Bradfield), all driven by the CMV promoter. Transfected DNA amounts were 50 ng of AhR, 50 ng of ARNT, 20 ng of pGudLuc 6.1, and 3 ng of pRL-TK. The total amount of transfected DNA was kept constant by addition of pCMVTNT vector with no insert. Cells were treated 5 h after transfection with either DMSO or TCDD at 0.5% final DMSO concentration. 18 h after dosing, cells were lysed and luminescence measured using the Dual Luciferase Assay kit (Promega) in a TD 20/20 Luminometer (Turner Designs, Sunnyvale, CA). Luminescence values were determined as a ratio of the firefly luciferase units to the Renilla luciferase units. The fractional response was then determined for each AhR at each TCDD concentration by subtracting the relative luminescence of vehicle-treated cells and determining the ratio of each value to the maximal responsiveness level in the concentration-response curve (Poland and Glover, 1975Go).

X. laevis cell culture.
X. laevis A6 kidney epithelial cells (ATCC; Manassas, VA; Rokaw et al., 1996Go) were grown under the recommended conditions (26°C; 5% CO2 atmosphere; NCTC 109 medium plus 10%; fetal bovine serum, and 200 mM L-glutamine/penicillin/streptomycin) in 25 cm2 flasks pretreated with purified human fibronectin (BD Biosciences). At 85% confluence, cells were exposed for 24 h with graded concentrations of TCDD dissolved in DMSO. Control cultures were exposed to an equal volume of DMSO (0.5% total). Total RNA was extracted with QIAshredder spin columns and RNeasy kits (Qiagen) prior to use in RT-PCR.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Two AhR1 Paralogs in Xenopus laevis: AhR1{alpha} and AhR1ß
To identify AhR cDNAs from X. laevis, we used RT-PCR with degenerate primers and RACE-PCR (Frohman et al., 1988Go) as described previously for numerous vertebrate species (Hahn et al., 1997Go; Karchner et al., 1999Go, 2000Go). These efforts resulted in the isolation of two distinct AhR cDNAs encoding proteins we call AhR1{alpha} (836 aa; 94.2 kDa; Genbank accession number AY635782) and AhR1ß (834 aa; 93.6 kDa; Genbank accession number AY635783). AhR1ß is identical to the X. laevis sequence reported previously by Ohi et al. (2003)Go. Sharing 86% overall amino acid identity, both proteins contain readily identifiable sequence signatures of AhRs from other species, including the basic helix-loop-helix domain, the PAS domains (Coumailleau et al., 1995Go; Fukunaga et al., 1995Go; Gu et al., 2000Go), nuclear localization (Ikuta et al., 1998Go) and export (Berg and Pongratz, 2001Go; Ikuta et al., 1998Go) motifs, and the retinoblastoma protein-binding motif (LXCXE; Elferink et al., 2001Go; Puga et al., 2000aGo; Fig. 1). Their designation as AhR1 orthologs is based on phylogenetic analyses (Fig. 2), which places both sequences in a clade containing mammalian AhRs and fish AhR1. Neither sequence is in the distinct AhR2 clade previously identified in fish.



View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Alignment of aryl hydrase receptor (AhR) amino acid sequences. Deduced amino acid sequences of from Xenopus laevis AhR1{alpha} and AhR1ß, Xenopus tropicalis AhR1, and Fundulus heteroclitus AhR1 and AhR2 (Karchner et al., 1999Go) were aligned using Clustal-X, version 1.8 (Thompson et al., 1997Go). Identities are boxed and shaded. Dashes indicate gaps in alignment. Several putative functional domains are indicated: basic and helix-loop-helix domains are denoted with solid lines above the sequence: PAS A and PAS B domains with hatched lines, and the ligand-binding domain is indicated by brackets (Coumailleau et al., 1995Go; Fukunaga et al., 1995Go). NLS, nuclear localization signal (Ikuta et al., 1998Go), NES1, nuclear export signal 1 (Ikuta et al., 1998Go), NES2, nuclear export signal 2 (Berg and Pongratz, 2001Go), and LXCXE motif, a retinoblastoma protein-binding motif (Elferink et al., 2001Go; Puga et al., 2000a) are indicated with boxes.

 


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Phylogenetic analysis of Xenopus AhR sequences. Amino acid sequences from the PAS domains of the indicated proteins were aligned, and the maximum parsimony tree was inferred with a branch-and-bound search using PAUP 4.0b10 (Swofford, 1998Go). Numbers at branch points are bootstrap values based on 100 samplings. This topology represents the bootstrap consensus tree. Mouse ARNT1 (GenBank accession number U14333) was used as the outgroup. Additional sequences include Caenorhabsitis elegans AhR (aha-1; AF039570), Mya AhR (AAF70378), Drosophila AhR (spineless; AF0560630), zebrafish AhR1 (AF258854), Fundulus heteroclitus AhR1 (AF024591), chick AhR (AF260832), rat AhR (U09000), mouse AhR (M94623), rabbit AhR (D38226), human AhR (L19872), F. heteroclitus AhR2 (U29679), zebrafish AhR2 (AF063446), rainbow trout AhR2ß (AF65138) and AhR2{alpha} (AF065137), F. heteroclitus AhRR (AF443441), and mouse AhRR (AB015140). The same evolutionary relationship between X. laevis AhR1{alpha}, AhR1ß, and X. tropicalis AhR was apparent in a tree derived using the Neighbor-Joining approach (data not shown).

 
We suggest that the two sequences represent distinct, paralogous genes. The existence of closely related paralogs is consistent with the genomic history of the Xenopus genus, which includes several genome duplication events associated with speciation. One genome duplication occurred following the divergence of X. laevis (pseudotetraploid; 2n = 36) and X. tropicalis (true diploid; 2n = 20), approximately 30 mya (Hughes and Hughes, 1993Go). If the AhR1 paralogs in X. laevis arose as a result of this genome duplication, then one would predict the existence of a single X. tropicalis AhR1 that is orthologous to both AhR1{alpha} and AhR1ß from X. laevis. We tested this hypothesis by cloning partial AhR1 cDNAs from X. tropicalis (Genbank accession number AY635784). The sequences of 10 different clones were essentially identical, while the same number of clones isolated from the same life stage of X. laevis (stage 47) readily yielded a number of sequences representing both AhR1{alpha} and AhR1ß paralogs. Subsequent searches of the X. tropicalis genome revealed a single AhR gene that is identical to the cDNA reported here. This sequence, which includes nearly all of the PAS domain, was aligned with that of other AhRs and was included in the phylogenetic analysis, which placed X. laevis AhR1{alpha} and AhR1ß in their own clade orthologous to the X. tropicalis AhR1 (Fig. 2). This tree topology is entirely consistent with the hypothesis that the two paralogs arose in the X. laevis genome duplication (Hughes and Hughes, 1993Go).

Expression of AhR1{alpha} and AhR1ß.
The relative mRNA expression of AhR1{alpha} and AhR1ß was assessed by semi-quantitative RT-PCR using primers specific to each cDNA. The two AhRs exhibit similar expression patterns, both in the adult animal, where expression is widespread (Fig. 3a), and during development (Fig. 3b), when mRNAs were detectable at stage 12 and after but not at stage 8. One possible difference in expression may be in the adult brain and eye, where AhR1ß mRNA appears to be more abundant than AhR1{alpha}. Notably, immunoreactive bands co-migrating with AhR1{alpha} and AhR1ß proteins could be resolved and detected on western blots of cytosolic extracts derived from whole tadpoles, suggesting that both proteins are expressed in vivo (Fig. 3c).



View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Expression patterns of X. laevis AhR1{alpha} and AhR1ß. (A) mRNA in adult organs. Expression of each transcript was assessed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using total RNA derived from the indicated organ from two adult frogs: Br, brain; Ey, eye; Ht, heart; In, intestines; Ky, kidney; Lv, liver; Lg, lung; M, leg muscle; Oo, immature oocyte; Ov, ovary; Sp, spleen; St, stomach; T, testis. Variability in efficiency is controlled by comparing each band density with that of ß-actin from the same tissue. Positions of size markers (MW) are indicated on the left (in base pairs, bp). Reactions in the bottom panel omitted the addition of reverse transcriptase during cDNA synthesis reactions. (B) mRNA during different developmental stages. Specific transcripts were detected as in adult animals by the use of total RNA from the Nieuwkoop and Faber (NF) stages (Nieuwkoop and Faber, 1994Go) indicated at the top. RNA was isolated from approximately 50 animals at each stage and pooled for RT-PCR. Reactions in lane C were performed with stage 54 RNA in the absence of reverse transcriptase. (C) AhR protein expression in different developmental stages. 25 µg of cytosolic protein isolated from the indicated NF stages and proteins synthesized in TNT reactions were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and Western blotting with antibody SA-210 (Biomol), directed against the N-terminal half of mouse AhR (Pollenz et al., 1994Go).

 
DNA binding activity of AhR1{alpha} and AhR1ß.
The strong sequence conservation of the DNA binding regions of both X. laevis AhRs suggests that both of these proteins may bind canonical XRE sequences. We assessed the DNA-binding ability of these proteins synthesized in TNT reactions by means of electrophoretic mobility shift assays (Fig. 4a). Both proteins exhibited TCDD-stimulated DNA binding in conjunction with human ARNT1 (Fig. 4b). DNA binding was sequence-specific; the shifted band could be displaced by a 100-fold excess of unlabeled XRE but not by an XRE with a point mutation in the core binding sequence. Unprogrammed TNT lysate did not support specific XRE binding.



View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. TCDD stimulated DNA binding by X. laevis AhR proteins. (A) Proteins were synthesized in TNT lysates. A fraction of each protein was synthesized in the presence of 35S-methionine, subjected to SDS-PAGE, and visualized by autoradiography. Each lane contains 5 µl of TNT lysate. Mobility of AhR proteins (around 100 kDa) is indicated by the dark arrow (right). Mobility of firefly luciferase (54 kDa) is indicated by the open arrow. (B) Electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Each synthetic AhR protein was combined with an equal volume of synthetic human ARNT and incubated with DMSO (lanes 2, 4, 8) or 40 nM TCDD (lanes 1, 3, 4–7, 9–11). Lane 11 contained unprogrammed TNT lysate in lieu of AhR protein. Reactions in lanes 6, 7, 10, and 11 contained 100-fold excess unlabeled wild-type mouse DRE (WT) or mutant DREs (MUT). An arrow (right) indicates the position of TCDD-stimulated shifted bands. A nonspecifically shifted band is indicated by an asterisk.

 
As observed for other mammalian (Dolwick et al., 1993Go; Hirose et al., 1996Go) and non-mammalian AhRs (Abnet et al., 1999aGo; Karchner et al., 1999Go; Tanguay et al., 1999Go), X. laevis AhR1{alpha} and AhR1ß exhibited some sequence-specific DNA binding in the absence of exogenous TCDD. The interaction could be reduced somewhat by pretreating the TNT lysates with DCC, and this suggests that this DNA binding is not constitutive but rather due to a ligand intrinsic to the lysate. However, complete reduction of background binding could not be achieved, because the use of additional DCC eliminated the protein synthesis activity of the lysates. Further, it is possible that the promiscuous nature of the DNA binding in these assays relates to the use of heterologous components, including human ARNT and probe derived from the mouse CYP1A1 promoter.

Xenopus laevis AhRs exhibit low TCDD affinity and transcriptional responsiveness: Ligand Binding and Transactivation Properties of AhR1{alpha} and AhR1ß.
The ability of frog AhRs to bind TCDD specifically was directly demonstrated by velocity sedimentation analysis on sucrose density gradients. Both AhR1{alpha} and AhR1ß exhibited detectable peaks of 3H-TCDD binding eluting from the gradient at a position similar to the mouse AhRb–1 (Fig. 5; Burbach et al., 1992Go). However, the degree of binding was much lower with the frog AhRs at the same concentration of TCDD, consistent with the electrophoretic mobility shift assays, in which DNA-binding activity of frog AhRs exceeded background levels only at relatively high concentrations of TCDD (Fig. 4b and data not shown). Taken together with the low toxicity of TCDD in frogs, these data suggest that TCDD may bind AhR1{alpha} and AhR1ß with low affinity. We tested this hypothesis by measuring the binding of affinity of each receptor for 3H-TCDD in saturation binding assays. AhR proteins were synthesized in TNT reactions (Fig. 4a), and nonspecific binding was assessed using an equal volume of unprogrammed TNT lysate. X. laevis AhR1{alpha} exhibited an apparent Kd of 47.2 nM (Fig. 6a), whereas AhR1ß was not saturable, even with free TCDD concentrations exceeding 25 nM, precluding ultimate quantification of TCDD affinity (Fig. 6b). In contrast, the mouse AhR exhibited an apparent Kd of only 2.4 nM (Fig. 6c).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Velocity sedimentation analysis of specific TCDD binding by X. laevis and mouse AhRs. Synthetic AhR proteins (squares) or unprogrammed TNT lysates (UPL; triangles) were incubated with 4 nM 3H-TCDD and fractionated in a sucrose density gradient ligand-binding assay. Specific binding (indicated by arrows) is the difference between total binding (reactions containing an AhR) and nonspecific binding (UPL). Sedimentation markers 14C-ovalbumin (3.6S) and 14C-catalase (11.3S) eluted at fractions 3–5 and 15–17, respectively.

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Saturation binding analysis of X. laevis and mouse AhRs. Panels show representative specific binding curves for (A) X. laevis AhR1{alpha}, (B) X. laevis AhR1ß, and (C) mouse AhR, each synthesized in TNT lysates. Graded concentrations of 3H-TCDD were incubated with TNT reactions diluted in MEDMG buffer as described in Materials and Methods. Unbound ligand was removed by extraction with dextran-coated charcoal, and total binding was quantified by liquid scintillation counting of the supernatant. Nonspecific binding was determined in parallel reactions containing unprogrammed TNT lysates. Curves were fit by nonlinear regression using GraphPad Prism version 4.0b. R2 (goodness-of-fit) values were 0.884 (AhR1{alpha}), 0.924 (AhR1ß), and 0.963 (mouse AhR).

 
Even within the technical limitations presented by this in vitro approach (Bradfield et al., 1988Go; Ramadoss and Perdew, 2004Go), it was clear that both X. laevis AhRs bound TCDD with substantially lower affinity than the mouse protein.

Technical issues confounding the accurate estimation of equilibrium dissociation constants for AhR proteins in saturation binding assays have been well documented in previously published studies. To control for the potential effects of high lipophilic ligand concentration, high total protein concentration (Bradfield et al., 1988Go), and potential artifacts of cell-free protein synthesis (Ramadoss and Perdew, 2004Go), we sought to confirm and further quantify results of the saturation binding analyses with transfection-based reporter gene assays. COS-7 cells were co-transfected with expression plasmids for a single AhR and human ARNT1 as well as pGudLuc6.1, a luciferase reporter gene containing a 480-bp portion of the mouse CYP1A1 regulatory region (Garrison et al., 1996Go; Long et al., 1998Go). The relative responsiveness of AhR1{alpha}, AhR1ß, and mouse AhR was assessed with graded concentrations of TCDD (Fig. 7). Differences in transcriptional activity were readily apparent. Although the X. laevis AhRs activated greater overall luciferase activity than the mouse protein, the response mediated by mouse AhR was saturated at much lower levels (Fig. 7a). The relative potencies of TCDD are more readily visualized by plotting the fractional induction against TCDD concentration for each AhR, dissecting dose responsiveness from efficacy (Fig. 7b). Using non-linear regression analysis, we estimated the EC50 for mouse AhR at 0.13 nM, whereas EC50's for X. laevis AhR1{alpha} and AhR1ß were estimated at 3.3 nM and 7.4 nM, respectively. Thus, the EC50 values estimated in these experiments reflect the relationship between the Kd's estimated by saturation binding analysis: TCDD exhibits at least 25-fold lower potency with either X. laevis AhR than with the mouse receptor.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. Transcriptional responsiveness of X. laevis and mouse AhRs in luciferase reporter gene assays. COS-7 cells were co-transfected with expression plasmids for a single AhR, human ARNT, pGudLuc6.1 (reporter construct), and pRL-TK (transfection control construct) as described in Materials and Methods. Cells were treated with DMSO or graded concentrations of TCDD, and luciferase activities were measured after 18 h. Relative luciferase units (RLU) were calculated by normalizing firefly luciferase activity to the activity of the transfection control, Renilla luciferase. Squares, X. laevis AhR1{alpha}; triangles, X. laevis AhR1ß; inverted triangles with dotted line, mouse AhR. (A) Overall responsiveness. Relative luciferase expression is plotted against TCDD concentration. Each data point represents the mean of triplicate wells, and error bars represent the standard error. Results are representative of three experiments. (B) Fractional induction. To more readily compare EC50's, mean RLU values from replicate experiments were pooled, and responsiveness at each TCDD concentration was normalized to the maximum response for each AhR.

 
TCDD responsiveness of X. laevis A6 cells.
To confirm observations of X. laevis AhR function made in vitro and in a heterologous system, we sought to determine the TCDD responsiveness of endogenously expressed AhR proteins by measuring CYP1A expression, an endpoint mediated directly by AhR, in X. laevis in A6 cells (Rokaw et al., 1996Go). A6 cells were exposed for 24 h to DMSO vehicle or graded concentrations of TCDD. RNA was extracted and semi-quantitative RT-PCR was performed to determine which AhR and ARNT genes are expressed in these cells and to estimate the dose responsiveness of CYP1A6 and CYP1A7 (Fujita et al., 1999Go) mRNA induction. A6 cells expressed both AhR1{alpha} and AhR1ß, as well as ARNT1 and ARNT2, although expression of ARNT2 mRNA was apparently much lower than the other transcripts (Fig. 8a). In TCDD-treated cells, the maximal response is not reached for either CYP1A, even at a nominal concentration of 100 nM TCDD; the quantity of RT-PCR product increased substantially when cells were exposed to 500 nM (Fig. 8b). Although it is possible that 500 nM TCDD induced a maximum level of CYP1A expression in these cells, there is no clear evidence for saturation of this response curve, and the maxima may yet require higher levels of TCDD exposure. Solubility concerns precluded using greater concentrations in these experiments. Nonetheless, CYP1A induction in X. laevis A6 cells appeared substantially less responsive to TCDD than other cell types, including zebrafish ZF-1 cells (EC50 = 590 pM [Henry et al., 2001Go]), rainbow trout RTG-2 cells (EC50 = 35 pM [Pollenz and Necela, 1998Go]) and murine Hepa 1c1c7 cells (EC50 = 40 pM [Okey et al., 1994Go; Pollenz, 1996Go]). Because both AhR1{alpha} and AhR1ß mRNAs were expressed in roughly comparable amounts, it is not clear which proteins actually participated in activation of CYP1A transcription in this system.



View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8. TCDD responsiveness in A6 cells. X. laevis A6 cells were grown to near confluence and treated with DMSO or graded concentrations of TCDD. CYP1A6 and CYP1A7 mRNA expression was detected by RT-PCR with total RNA. (A) Expression of mRNAs encoding components of the AhR signaling pathway. Target transcripts are indicated above each lane. Mobility of DNA size markers (MW) is indicated on the left. One ß-actin reaction omitted the addition of reverse transcriptase during the cDNA synthesis phase (–RT). (B) Cyp1A inducibility. Cells treated for 24 h with graded concentrations of TCDD (indicated at bottom). Total RNA was isolated and subjected to RT-PCR with primers specific for CYP1A6 and CYP1A7. Controls lacking reverse transcriptase (not shown) were performed for each concentration and primer pair.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The overall objective of these studies was to investigate the role of AhR expression and function in frog HAH insensitivity. This phenomenon was first documented decades ago (e.g., Beatty et al., 1976Go) and subsequently in FETAX studies (reviewed in Bantle, 1996Go), but mechanistic studies are less extensive. Jung and Walker (1997)Go, using several North American ranid frogs, demonstrated the relatively short half-life of TCDD in both embryos and tadpoles, suggesting that rapid elimination is a mechanistically important factor underlying the lack of TCDD-induced lethality in these species. However, they noted that the magnitude of difference in the TCDD elimination rate between the frogs and salmonid fish (~10-fold) may not be enough to account for the much larger discrepancy in toxicity in these animals, and it suggested that differences in AhR expression or TCDD affinity might also contribute to frog insensitivity. Results from our study are consistent with a role for AhR function: In saturation binding assays using synthetic protein, in reporter gene assays using heterologously expressed protein, and in cultured cells expressing endogenous proteins, we show that X. laevis AhRs are consistently and substantially less responsive to TCDD than the mouse AhRb–1, a well-characterized high-affinity receptor from a sensitive strain of mice.

Variations in AhR affinity for TCDD are known to correlate with TCDD sensitivity differences in other species and strains of animals. For example, Sanderson and Bellward (1995)Go showed that pigeons, great blue herons, and cormorants exhibit TCDD affinities around 15 nM in hepatic cytosol, with EC50's for CYP1A induction ranging from 3 µg to 20 µg/kg egg. Chickens, which exhibit 10-fold higher affinity for TCDD (Kd = 1.2 nM) showed an EC50 for CYP1A induction 10- to 100-fold lower than the less sensitive birds (0.2 µg/kg egg; Sanderson and Bellward, 1995Go). In mice, a single point mutation (A375V) in the AhR is associated with a 4–5-fold reduction in TCDD affinity in the AhRd allele compared to the AhRb–1 allele (Ema et al., 1994Go; Poland et al., 1994Go; Ramadoss and Perdew, 2004Go) and an 8- to 24-fold reduction in TCDD toxicity in AhRd/d animals compared with those homozygous for the b-1 allele (Birnbaum et al., 1990Go). Like AhRd, the lower affinity human AhR also contains valine at this position (Ema et al., 1994Go; Poland et al., 1994Go; Ramadoss and Perdew, 2004Go). Notably, although they bind TCDD with low affinity, both X. laevis AhR1s resemble the high-affinity mouse allele with an alanine in the corresponding position. Given the great deal of divergence between the frog and mammalian proteins (~55% overall amino acid identity), the large differences in affinity and transcriptional activity seen between the frog and mouse AhRs likely result from a number of structural and functional variations in the proteins.

Saturation Binding Curves versus AhR Responsiveness in Cells
The saturation binding assays performed in these studies (Fig. 6) likely underestimate the absolute affinity of the receptors for TCDD. In saturation binding assays with mouse and human AhRs, apparent binding affinities are known to vary inversely with overall protein concentration (Bradfield et al., 1988Go; Ramadoss and Perdew, 2004Go). Detection of specific binding activity of the X. laevis AhRs required lower dilutions of the TNT lysates (and hence higher overall protein concentrations) than those used in previous studies (e.g., Jensen and Hahn, 2001Go), and the conditions for the mouse AhR binding assays were adjusted to match. Concomitantly, Kd estimates for the mouse AhRb–1 protein were 3- to 10-fold higher that those reported in previous studies of TNT proteins (Ema et al., 1994Go; Jensen and Hahn 2001Go; Poland et al. 1994Go), suggesting that the affinity of the frog AhRs for TCDD was also greater than measured. However, because assays were performed in parallel under identical conditions, the relative affinities determined here nonetheless provide compelling evidence for low-affinity TCDD binding by X. laevis AhRs—a property that likely underlies low TCDD toxicity.

Importantly, the relative TCDD affinities of frog and mouse AhRs were reflected consistently in the activity of each protein in the luciferase reporter gene assays (Fig. 7). These transfection-based assays are perhaps a more relevant indication of the TCDD responsiveness of all three AhRs than the saturation binding curves, providing an integrated measure of ligand binding affinity and intrinsic efficacy. Recent studies comparing ligand binding by AhR in intact cells and in cell lysates suggest that receptors retain greater activity in intact cells, offering a more accurate reflection of their true ligand-binding properties (Ramadoss and Perdew, 2004Go). Furthermore, in studies of several cell lines, the EC50 for CYP1A induction was typically well below the apparent Kd of the cytosolic receptor for TCDD (Hestermann et al., 2000Go; Pollenz, 1996Go; Pollenz and Necela, 1998Go), a phenomenon that relates to the existence of "spare receptors" in the system (Hestermann et al., 2000Go). We observed a similar relationship between in vitro binding affinity and the dose response of luciferase reporter gene induction by X. laevis AhR1{alpha} and AhR1ß, conceivably due to both technical and physiological factors.

Evolution and AhR Gene Multiplicity
The existence of multiple AhR genes in a single species is not without precedent. Many fish harbor two AhR genes, AhR1 and AhR2, that arose from an ancient gene duplication event predating the divergence of cartilaginous fish from the vertebrate lineage (Hahn et al., 1997Go). Phylogenetic analysis of X. laevis AhRs reveals that they arose from a much more recent gene duplication event, likely associated with a duplication of the entire genome, a common occurrence in members of the Xenopus genus. Consistent with this interpretation, phylogenetic analysis reveals that both AhR1{alpha} and AhR1ß are orthologous to the AhR found in Xenopus tropicalis (Fig. 2), a true diploid species that diverged from the common Xenopus lineage prior to the genome duplication event associated with X. laevis. Numerous recently diverged paralogous genes have been documented in X. laevis (Hughes and Hughes, 1993Go), including those encoding other nuclear receptors (Grun et al., 2002Go; Moore et al., 2002Go; Wu et al., 2003Go). The existence of AhR2 orthologs in X. laevis remains a possibility. However, BLAST searches of the recently re-annotated X. tropicalis genome revealed only one AhR gene, identical to the sequence we report here. This suggests that the more ancient AhR2 paralog may have been lost in the Xenopus lineage, as it apparently has in mammals (Hahn et al., 1997Go; Karchner et al., 1999Go).

X. laevis AhR1{alpha} and AhR1ß are somewhat reminiscent of AhR2{alpha} and AhR2ß, closely related AhR paralogs in rainbow trout (Oncorhyncus mykiss), another pseudotetraploid species (Abnet et al., 1999aGo), although the X. laevis AhR1 paralogs share fewer amino acid identities (86% versus 97%). The rainbow trout AhR2 paralogs are both capable of binding TCDD, but they show distinct promoter and ligand preferences in reporter gene assays (Abnet et al., 1999bGo), a subtly different expression pattern, and differentially induced expression by TCDD exposure in some animal tissues (Abnet et al., 1999aGo), suggesting that they have distinct physiological functions. Our studies reveal more similarities than differences in X. laevis AhR1{alpha} and AhR1ß. They are very similar in size and sequence and share comparable expression patterns and responsiveness to TCDD. However, functional differences may well exist. The relative abilities of each protein to bind other AhR ligands, activate transcription in different promoter contexts, interact with X. laevis ARNT1 and ARNT2, and function in conjunction with each other are currently under investigation.

Significance of Multiple, Low-Affinity AhRs in X. laevis
In addition to their historical use as a model of vertebrate development, X. laevis embryos are used in FETAX, a standardized test of developmental toxicity (ASTM, 1998Go; Bantle, 1996Go). Substantial effort has been invested by research groups (e.g., Bantle et al., 1990Go, 1994Go, 1996Go, 1999Go; Fort et al., 1989Go, 2001aGo, 2001bGo, 1995Go, 1998Go) and government panels (FETAX, 2000) to validate this test and to adapt it for use in the screening of chemicals and environmental samples. With the discovery of two X. laevis AhRs with low affinity for TCDD, this study identifies an important mechanistic basis for the differences in HAH toxicity between the frog embryo model and other vertebrates, including humans, which should help to evaluate and refine the use of FETAX in conjunction with HAH-containing samples. Low affinity of X. laevis AhRs for other ligands might also explain the low toxicity of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in FETAX, and it may underlie the historically reported low expression levels of cytochromes P-450 during early frog development (ASTM, 1998Go; Bantle, 1996Go; Bantle et al., 1991Go; Fort et al., 1991Go, 2001aGo, 2001bGo).


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Mark E. Hahn, Dr. Sibel Karchner, and Diana Franks (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution) for their generous sharing of advice, assistance, and materials in development of ligand binding assays and luciferase reporter gene assays. Blythe H. Philips (Kenyon College) provided expert technical assistance and animal husbandry support. Dr. C. A. Bradfield (University of Wisconsin) generously provided pSPORTAhR and pSPORTARNT plasmids. We thank Dr. Christopher M. Gillen (Kenyon College) for his critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by the Kenyon College Summer Science Scholars Program, Kenyon College Faculty Development Funds, and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R15 ES011130). Conflict of interest: none declared.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Abnet, C. C., Tanguay, R. L., Hahn, M. E., Heideman, W., and Peterson, R. E. (1999a). Two forms of aryl hydrocarbon receptor type 2 in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): Evidence for differential expression and enhancer specificity. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 15159–15166.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Abnet, C. C., Tanguay, R. L., Heideman, W., and Peterson, R. E. (1999b). Transactivation activity of human, zebrafish, and rainbow trout aryl hydrocarbon receptors expressed in COS-7 cells: Greater insight into species differences in toxic potency of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin, dibenzofuran, and biphenyl congeners. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 159, 41–51.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). (1998). Standard guide for conducting the frog embryo teratogenesis assay—Xenopus (FETAX). In Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 11.05, pp. 826–836, ASTM, Philadelphia.

Bantle, J. A. (1996). FETAX—A developmental toxicity assay using frog embryos. In Fundamentals of Aquatic Toxicology (G. M. Rand, Editor), pp. 207–230, Taylor and Francis, Washington, DC.

Bantle, J. A., Burton, D. T., Dawson, D. A., Dumont, J. N., Finch, R. A., Fort, D. J., Linder, G., Rayburn, J. R., Buchwalter, D., Maurice, M. A., et al. (1994). Initial interlaboratory validation study of FETAX: Phase I testing. J. Appl. Toxicol. 14, 213–223.[ISI][Medline]

Bantle, J. A., Dumont, J. N., Finch, R. A., and Linder, G. (1991). Atlas of Abnormalities: A Guide to the Performance of FETAX. Oklahoma State Publications Dept., Stillwater, OK.

Bantle, J. A., Finch, R. A., Burton, D. T., Fort, D. J., Dawson, D. A., Linder, G., Rayburn, J. R., Hull, M., Kumsher-King, M., Gaudet-Hull, A. M., et al. (1996). FETAX interlaboratory validation study: Phase III—Part 1 testing. J. Appl. Toxicol. 16, 517–528.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Bantle, J. A., Finch, R. A., Fort, D. J., Stover, E. L., Hull, M., Kumsher-King, M., and Gaudet-Hull, A. M. (1999). Phase III interlaboratory study of FETAX. Part 3. FETAX validation using 12 compounds with and without an exogenous metabolic activation system. J. Appl. Toxicol. 19, 447–472.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Bantle, J. A., Fort, D. J., Rayburn, J. R., DeYoung, D. J., and Bush, S. J. (1990). Further validation of FETAX: Evaluation of the developmental toxicity of five known mammalian teratogens and non-teratogens. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 13, 267–282.[ISI][Medline]

Beatty, P. W., Holscher, M. A., and Neal, R. A. (1976). Toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachloridibenzo-p-dioxin in larval and adult forms of Rana catesbeiana. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 16, 578–581.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Belair, C. D., Peterson, R. E., and Heideman, W. (2001). Disruption of erythropoiesis by dioxin in the zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 222, 581–594.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Berg, P., and Pongratz, I. (2001). Differential usage of nuclear export sequences regulates intracellular localization of the dioxin (aryl hydrocarbon) receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 43231–43238.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Birnbaum, L. S. (1991). Developmental toxicity of TCDD and related compounds: Species sensitivities and differences. In Banbury Report 35: Biological Basis for Risk Assessment of Dioxins and Related Compounds (M. A. Gallo, R. J. Scheuplein and K. A. V. d. Heijden, Editors), pp. 51–67, Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

Birnbaum, L. S., McDonald, M. M., Blair, P. C., Clark, A. M., and Harris, M. W. (1990). Differential toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in C57BL/6J mice congenic at the Ah locus. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 15, 186–200.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Bollerot, K., Angelier, N., and Coumailleau, P. (2001). Molecular cloning and embryonic expression of the Xenopus Arnt gene. Mech. Dev. 108, 227–231.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Bradfield, C. A., Kende, A. S., and Poland, A. (1988). Kinetic and equilibrium studies of Ah receptor-ligand binding: Use of [125I]2-iodo-7,8-dibromodibenzo-p-dioxin. Mol. Pharmacol. 34, 229–237.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Burbach, K. M., Poland, A., and Bradfield, C. A. (1992). Cloning of the Ah receptor cDNA reveals a distinctive ligand-activated transcription factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89, 8185–8189.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Carlson, D. B., and Perdew, G. H. (2002). A dynamic role for the Ah receptor in cell signaling? Insights from a diverse group of Ah receptor interacting proteins. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 16, 317–325.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Coumailleau, P., Poellinger, L., Gustafsson, J.-A., and Whitelaw, M. L. (1995). Definition of a minimal domain of the dioxin receptor that is associated with hsp90 and maintains wild type ligand binding affinity and specificity. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 25291–25300.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Couture, L. A., Abbott, B. D., and Birnbaum, L. S. (1990). A critical review of the developmental toxicity and teratogenicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin: Recent advances toward understanding the mechanism. Teratology 42, 619–627.[ISI][Medline]

Dawson, D. A., Schultz, T. W., and Shroeder, E. C. (1992). Laboratory care and breeding of the African clawed frog. Lab. Anim. (N.Y.) 21, 31–36.

Dell'Orto, N., Cantelli, D., and Urani, C. (1998). Cellular targets in response to dioxin exposure. Chemosphere 37, 2809–2821.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Dolwick, K. M., Schmidt, J. V., Carver, L. A., Swanson, H. I., and Bradfield, C. A. (1993). Cloning and expression of a human Ah receptor cDNA. Mol. Pharmacol. 44, 911–917.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Elferink, C. J., Ge, N. L., and Levine, A. (2001). Maximal aryl hydrocarbon receptor activity depends on an interaction with the retinoblastoma protein. Mol. Pharmacol. 59, 664–673.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Elonen, G. E., Spehar, R. L., Holcombe, G. W., Johnson, R. D., Fernandez, J. D., Tietge, J. E., and Cook, P. M. (1998). Comparative toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) to seven freshwater species during early-life-stage development. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 17, 472–483.[CrossRef][ISI]

Ema, M., Ohe, N., Suzuki, M., Mimura, J., Sogawa, K., Ikawa, S., and Fujii-Kuriyama, Y. (1994). Dioxin binding activities of polymorphic forms of mouse and human aryl hydrocarbon receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 27337–27343.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Felsenstein, J. (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783–791.[ISI]

FETAX Expert Panel (2000). Minutes of the expert panel meeting on the frog embryo teratogenesis assay—Xenopus (FETAX): A proposed screening method for identifying the developmental toxicity potential of chemicals and environmental samples. The Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM), Durham, NC.

Fisher, M. A., Jelaso, A. M., Predenkiewicz, A., Schuster, L., Means, J., and Ide, C. F. (2003). Exposure to the polychlorinated biphenyl mixture Aroclor 1254 alters melanocyte and tail muscle morphology in developing Xenopus laevis tadpoles. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 22, 321–328.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Fort, D. J., James, B. L., and Bantle, J. A. (1989). Evaluation of the developmental toxicity of five compounds with the frog embryo teratogenesis assay: Xenopus (FETAX) and a metabolic activation system. J. Appl. Toxicol. 9, 377–388.[ISI][Medline]

Fort, D. J., Rayburn, J. R., DeYoung, D. J., and Bantle, J. A. (1991). Assessing the efficacy of an Aroclor 1254-induced exogenous metabolic activation system for FETAX. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 14, 143–160.[ISI][Medline]

Fort, D. J., Rogers, R. L., Paul, R. R., Stover, E. L., and Finch, R. A. (2001a). Optimization of an exogenous metabolic activation system for FETAX. II. Preliminary evaluation. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 24, 117–127.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Fort, D. J., Rogers, R. L., Stover, E. L., and Finch, R. A. (2001b). Optimization of an exogenous metabolic activation system for FETAX. I. Post-isolation rat liver microsome mixtures. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 24, 103–115.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Fort, D. J., Stover, E. L., Bantle, J. A., Rayburn, J. R., Hull, M. A., Finch, R. A., Burton, D. T., Turley, S. D., Dawson, D. A., Linder, G., et al. (1998). Phase III interlaboratory study of FETAX, Part 2: Interlaboratory validation of an exogenous metabolic activation system for frog embryo teratogenesis assay–Xenopus (FETAX). Drug Chem. Toxicol. 21, 1–14.

Fort, D. J., Stover, E. L., and Norton, D. (1995). Ecological hazard assessment of aqueous soil extracts using FETAX. Frog Embryo Teratogenesis Assay–Xenopus. J. Appl. Toxicol. 15, 183–191.[ISI][Medline]

Frohman, M. A., Dush, M. K., and Martin, G. R. (1988). Rapid production of full-length cDNAs from rare transcripts: Amplification using a single gene-specific oligonucleotide primer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 8998–9002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Frueh, F. W., Hayashibara, K. C., Brown, P. O., and Whitlock, J. P. J. (2001). Use of cDNA microarrays to analyze dioxin-induced changes in human liver gene expression. Toxicol. Lett. 122, 189–203.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Fujita, Y., Ohi, H., Murayama, N., Saguchi, K., and Higuchi, S. (1999). Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of cDNAs coding for 3-methylcholanthrene-inducible cytochromes P450 in Xenopus laevis liver. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 371, 24–28.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Fukunaga, B. N., Probst, M. R., Reiszporszasz, S., and Hankinson, O. (1995). Identification of functional domains of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 29270–29278.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Garrison, P. M., Tullis, K., Aarts, J. M. M. J. G., Brouwer, A., Giesy, J. P., and Denison, M. S. (1996). Species-specific recombinant cell lines as bioassay systems for the detection of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin–like chemicals. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 30, 194–203.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Grun, F., Venkatesan, R. N., Tabb, M. M., Zhou, C., Cao, J., Hemmati, D., and Blumberg, B. (2002). Benzoate X receptors alpha and beta are pharmacologically distinct and do not function as xenobiotic receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 43691–43697.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gu, Y. Z., Hogenesch, J. B., and Bradfield, C. A. (2000). The PAS superfamily: Sensors of environmental and developmental signals. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 40, 519–561.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Gutleb, A. C., Appelman, J., Bronkhorst, M., Van den Berg, J. H. J., and Murk, A. J. (2000). Effects of oral exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) on the development and metamorphosis of tadpoles from two amphibian species (Xenopus laevis and Rana temporaria). Sci. Total Environ. 262, 147–157.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Gutleb, A. C., Appelman, J., Bronkhorst, M. D., Van den Berg, J. H. J., Spenkelink, A., Brouwer, A., and Murk, A. J. (1999). Delayed effects of pre- and early-life time exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls on tadpoles of two amphibian species (Xenopus laevis and Rana temporaria). Envrion. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 8, 1–14.[CrossRef]

Hahn, M. E. (1998). Mechanisms of innate and acquired resistance to dioxin-like compounds. Rev. Toxicol. 2, 395–443.

Hahn, M. E., Karchner, S. I., Shapiro, M. A., and Perera, S. A. (1997). Molecular evolution of two vertebrate aryl hydrocarbon (dioxin) receptors (AhR1 and AhR2) and the PAS family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 13743–13748.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hahn, M. E., Lamb, T. M., Schultz, M. E., Smolowitz, R. M., and Stegeman, J. J. (1993). Cytochrome P4501A induction and inhibition by 3,3',4,4'-tetrachlorobiphenyl in an Ah receptor–containing fish hepatoma cell line (PLHC-1). Aquat. Toxicol. 26, 185–208.[CrossRef][ISI]

Hankinson, O. (1995). The aryl hydrocarbon receptor complex. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 35, 307–340.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Henry, T. R., Nesbit, D. J., Heideman, W., and Peterson, R. E. (2001). Relative potencies of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin, dibenzofuran, and biphenyl congeners to induce cytochrome P4501A mRNA in a zebrafish liver cell line. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 20, 1053–1058.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Henry, T. R., Spitsbergen, J. M., Hornung, M. W., Abnet, C. C., and Peterson, R. E. (1997). Early life stage toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in Zebrafish (Danio rerio). Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 142, 56–68.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Hestermann, E. V., Stegeman, J. J., and Hahn, M. E. (2000). Relative contributions of affinity and intrinsic efficacy to aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand potency. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 168, 160–172.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Hirose, K., Morita, M., Ema, M., Mimura, J., Hamada, H., Fujii, H., Saijo, Y., Gotoh, O., Sogawa, K., and Fujii-Kuriyama, Y. (1996). cDNA cloning and tissue-specific expression of a novel basic helix-loop-helix/PAS factor (Arnt2) with close sequence similarity to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (Arnt). Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 1706–1713.[Abstract]

Hoffman, E. C., Reyes, H., Chu, F.-F., Sander, F., Conley, L. H., Brooks, B. A., and Hankinson, O. (1991). Cloning of a factor required for activity of the Ah (dioxin) receptor. Science 252, 954–958.[ISI][Medline]

Hughes, M. K., and Hughes, A. L. (1993). Evolution of duplicate genes in a tetraploid animal, Xenopus laevis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10, 1360–1369.[Abstract]

Ikuta, T., Eguchi, H., Tachibana, T., Yoneda, Y., and Kawajiri, K. (1998). Nuclear localization and export signals of the human aryl hydrocarbon receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 2895–2904.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ivnitski, I., Elmaoued, R., and Walker, M. K. (2001). 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) inhibition of coronary development is preceded by a decrease in myocyte proliferation and an increase in cardiac apoptosis. Teratology 64, 201–212.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Jensen, A. A. (1987). Polychlorobipneyls (PCBs), polychlorodibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorodibenzofurans (PCDFs) in human milk, blood, and adipose tissue. Sci. Total Environ. 64, 259–293.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Jensen, B. A., and Hahn, M. E. (2001). cDNA cloning and characterization of a high affinity aryl hydrocarbon receptor in a cetacean, the beluga, Delphinapterus leucas. Toxicol. Sci. 64, 41–56.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Johnson, R. D., Tietge, J. E., Jensen, K. M., Fernandez, J. D., Linnum, A. L., Lothenbach, D. B., Holcombe, G. W., Cook, P. M., Christ, S. A., Lattier, D. L., and Gordon, D. A. (1998). Toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin to early life stage brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) following parental dietary exposure. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 17, 2408–2421.[CrossRef][ISI]

Jung, R. E., and Walker, M. K. (1997). Effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) on development of anuran amphibians. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 16, 230–240.[CrossRef][ISI]

Karchner, S. I., Franks, D. G., Powell, W. H., and Hahn, M. E. (2002). Regulatory interactions among three members of the vertebrate aryl hydrocarbon receptor family: AhR Repressor, AhR1, and AhR2. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 6949–6959.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Karchner, S. I., Kennedy, S. W., Trudeau, S., and Hahn, M. E. (2000). Towards a molecular understanding of species differences in dioxin sensitivity: Initial characterization of Ah receptor cDNAs in birds and an amphibian. Mar. Environ. Res. 20, 51–56.[CrossRef]

Karchner, S. I., Powell, W. H., and Hahn, M. E. (1999). Structural and functional characterization of two highly divergent aryl hydrocarbon receptors (AhR1 and AhR2) in the teleost Fundulus heteroclitus. Evidence for a novel class of ligand-binding basic helix-loop-helix Per-ARNT-Sim (bHLH-PAS) factors. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 33814–33824.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kenakin, T. (1999). Pharmacologic Analysis of Drug–Receptor Interactions. CRC/Raven Press, New York.

Long, W. P., Pray-Grant, M., Tsai, J. C., and Perdew, G. H. (1998). Protein kinase C activity is required for aryl hydrocarbon receptor pathway-mediated signal transduction. Mol. Pharmacol. 53, 691–700.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Moore, L. B., Maglich, J. M., McKee, D. D., Wisely, B., Willson, T. M., Kliewer, S. A., Lambert, M. H., and Moore, J. T. (2002). Pregnane X receptor (PXR), constitutive androstane receptor (CAR), and benzoate X receptor (BXR) define three pharmacologically distinct classes of nuclear receptors. Mol. Endocrinol. 16, 977–986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nieuwkoop, P. D., and Faber, J. (1994). Normal Table of Xenopus Laevis (Daudin). Garland Publishing, Inc., New York and London.

Ohi, H., Fujita, Y., Miyao, M., Saguchi, K., Murayama, N., and Higuchi, S. (2003). Molecular cloning and expression analysis of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor of Xenopus laevis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 307, 595–599.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Okey, A. B., Riddick, D. S., and Harper, P. A. (1994). The Ah receptor: Mediator of the toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and related compounds. Toxicol. Lett. 70, 1–22.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Peterson, R. E., Theobald, H. M., and Kimmel, G. L. (1993). Developmental and reproductive toxicity of dioxins and related compounds—cross-species comparisons. CRC Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 23, 283–335.

Poland, A., and Glover, E. (1975). Genetic expression of aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin: Evidence for a receptor mutation in genetically non-responsive mice. Mol. Pharmacol. 11, 389–398.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Poland, A., Glover, E., and Kende, A. S. (1976). Stereospecific, high-affinity binding of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin by hepatic cytosol. J. Biol. Chem. 251, 4936–4946.[Abstract]

Poland, A., Palen, D., and Glover, E. (1994). Analysis of the four alleles of the murine aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Mol. Pharmacol. 46m, 915–921.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pollenz, R. S. (1996). The aryl hydrocarbon receptor, but not the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator protein, is rapidly depleted in hepatic and nonhepatic culture cells exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Mol. Pharmacol. 49, 391–398.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pollenz, R. S., and Necela, B. (1998). Characterization of two continuous cell lines derived from Oncorhynchus mykiss for models of Ah-receptor mediated signal transduction. Direct comparison to the mammalian Hepa-1c1c7 cell line. Aquat. Toxicol. 41, 31–49.[CrossRef][ISI]

Pollenz, R. S., Sattler, C. A., and Poland, A. (1994). The aryl hydrocarbon receptor and aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator protein show distinct subcellular localizations in Hepa 1c1c7 cells by immunofluorescence. Mol. Pharmacol. 45, 428–438.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Powell, W. H., Bright, R., Bello, S. M., and Hahn, M. E. (2000). Developmental and tissue-specific expression of AhR1, AhR2, and ARNT2 in dioxin-sensitive and -resistant populations of the marine fish, Fundulus heteroclitus. Toxicol. Sci. 57, 229–239.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Powell, W. H., Karchner, S. I., Bright, R., and Hahn, M. E. (1999). Functional diversity of vertebrate ARNT proteins: Identification of ARNT2 as the predominant form of ARNT in the marine teleost, Fundulus heteroclitus. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 361, 156–163.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Puga, A., Barnes, S. J., Dalton, T. P., Chang, C., Knudsen, E. S., and Maier, M. A. (2000a). Aromatic hydrocarbon receptor interaction with the retinoblastoma protein potentiates repression of E2F-dependent transcription and cell cycle arrest. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 2943–2950.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Puga, A., Maier, A., and Medvedovic, M. (2000b). The transcriptional signature of dioxin in human hepatoma HepG2 cells. Biochem. Pharmacol. 60, 1129–1142.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Puga, A., Xia, Y., and Elferink, C. (2002). Role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in cell cycle regulation. Chemico-Biol.l Interact. 141, 117–130.[CrossRef]

Ramadoss, P., and Perdew, G. H. (2004). Use of 2-azido-3-[125I]iodo-7,8-dibromodibenzo-p-dioxin as a probe to determine the relative ligand affinity of human versus mouse aryl hydrocarbon receptor in cultured cells. Mol. Pharmacol. 66, 129–136.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rappe, C., Bergqvist, P.-A., Kjeller, L.-O., Swanson, S., Belton, T., Ruppel, B., Lockwood, K., and Kahn, P. C. (1991). Levels and patterns of PCDD and PCDF contamination in fish, crabs, and lobsters from Newark Bay and the New York Bight. Chemosphere 22, 239–266.[CrossRef][ISI]

Rokaw, M. D., West, M., and Johnson, J. P. (1996). Rapamycin inhibits protein kinase C activity and stimulates Na+ transport in A6 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 32468–32473.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rowatt, A. J., DePowell, J. J., and Powell, W. H. (2003). ARNT gene multiplicity in amphibians: Characterization of ARNT2 from the frog Xenopus laevis. J. Exp. Zool. 300B, 48–57.

Saitou, N., and Nei, M. (1987). The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4, 406–425.[Abstract]

Sakamoto, M. K., Mima, S., Takahashi, K. P., and Tanimura, T. (1997). Apoptotic cell death of erythrocytes in Xenopus larvae exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Toxicol. Pathol. 25, 398–402.[ISI][Medline]

Sakamoto, M. K., Mima, S., and Tanimura, T. (1995). A morphological study of liver lesions in Xenopus larvae exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) with special reference to apoptosis of hepatocytes. J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol. Oncol. 14, 69–82.[Medline]

Sanderson, J. T., and Bellward, G. D. (1995). Hepatic microsomal ethoxyresorufin O-deethylase-inducing potency in ovo and cytosolic Ah receptor binding affinity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin: Comparison of four avian species. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 132, 131–145.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Schmidt, J. V., and Bradfield, C. A. (1996). Ah receptor signaling pathways. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 12, 55–89.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Swofford, D. L. (1998). PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.

Tanguay, R. L., Abnet, C. C., Heideman, W., and Peterson, R. E. (1999). Cloning and characterization of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (Gene Struct. Express) 1444, 35–48.[CrossRef][ISI]

Teraoka, H., Dong, W., Ogawa, S., Tsukiyama, S., Okuhara, Y., Niiyama, M., Ueno, N., Peterson, R. E., and Hiraga, T. (2002). 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin toxicity in the zebrafish embryo: Altered regional blood flow and impaired lower jaw development. Toxicol. Sci. 65, 192–199.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Thompson, J. D., Gibson, T. J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F., and Higgins, D. G. (1997). The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 4876–4882.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

van den Berg, M., Birnbaum, L., Bosveld, B. T. C., Brunström, B., Cook, P., Feeley, M., Giesy, J. P., Hanberg, A., Hasegawa, R., Kennedy, S. W., et al. (1998). Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for PCBs, PCDDs, and PCDFs for humans and wildlife. Environ. Health Persp. 106, 775–792.[ISI][Medline]

Walker, M. K., and Catron, T. F. (2000). Characterization of cardiotoxicity induced by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and related chemicals during early chick embryo development. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 167, 210–221.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Wu, K. H., Tobias, M. L., Thornton, J. W., and Kelley, D. B. (2003). Estrogen receptors in Xenopus: Duplicate genes, splice variants, and tissue-specific expression. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 133, 38–49.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Zabel, E. W., Cook, P. M., and Peterson, R. E. (1995). Toxic equivalency factors of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofurans, and biphenyl congeners based on early life stage mortality in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquat. Toxicol. 31, 315–328.[CrossRef][ISI]





This Article
Abstract
Full Text (PDF)
All Versions of this Article:
88/1/60    most recent
kfi228v1
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Add to My Personal Archive
Download to citation manager
Disclaimer
Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Articles by Lavine, J. A.
Articles by Powell, W. H.
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Lavine, J. A.
Articles by Powell, W. H.