* RTI, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina;
EPL, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina;
GE Plastics, Pittsfield, Massachusetts;
Aristech Chemical Corp., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania;
¶ Shell Chemical Co., Houston, Texas;
|| Bayer Corp., Stilwell, Kansas;
||
Bayer AG, Wuppertal, Germany; and
|||| The Dow Chemical Co., Midland, Michigan
Received March 20, 2001; accepted February 11, 2002
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key Words: Bisphenol A; CAS No. 80-05-7; dietary administration; systemic toxicity; reproductive toxicity; postnatal toxicity; OPPTS 837.3800 guidelines.
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In vivo, Milligan et al. (1998) showed BPA to be 10,000-fold less potent in producing a uterotrophic effect than estradiol following sc injections into ovariectomized mice. Ashby and Tinwell (1998), Jekat et al. (2000), Kim et al. (2001), Laws et al. (2000), Matthews et al. (2001), and Yamasaki et al. (2000) also reported uterotrophic effects in rats following high oral and/or sc dosing, and Goloubkova et al. (2000) reported stimulatory effects on the growth of the pituitary gland following high sc doses of BPA.
Research conducted in the 1970s and 1980s, using 1-generation (CD rats) or 2-generation continuous breeding (CD-1 mice) designs, indicated that BPA was not a selective reproductive toxicant with high dietary BPA concentrations (Morrissey et al., 1989; Wazeter and Goldenthal, 1984a
,b
). Standard Segment II developmental toxicity studies in CD rats and CD-1 mice administered BPA at high doses by gavage on gestational day (GD) 615 indicated that BPA was not a selective developmental toxicant (Morrissey et al., 1987
). More recently, Liaw et al. (1998) showed that exposure of pregnant SD (Sprague-Dawley) rats to BPA in drinking water from GD 2 through lactation (until PND 21) at 0, 0.005, 0.05, 0.5, 5, or 50 mg/l (ppm) and DES at 0.05 mg/l (ppm) did not affect the age or body weight at acquisition of VP and had no significant effects on reproductive organ development. DES accelerated acquisition of VP (with reduced body weights).
In contrast to the "high" dose studies above, oral administration (presentation to the dam's buccal cavity) of BPA at 2 and 20 µg/kg/day in corn oil to pregnant CF-1 mice on GD 1117 was reported to increase prostate gland weight at both doses and decrease DSP per gram testis (efficiency of DSP) at 20 µg/kg/day in offspring males (Nagel et al., 1997; vom Saal et al., 1998
). However, these reported low-dose effects of BPA could not be reproduced in more robust studies designed with larger numbers of animals and the same (Ashby et al., 1999
) and additional lower and higher doses (Cagen et al., 1999a
), and the NTP Low-Dose Peer Review's Statistical Subpanel could not confirm the statistical significance of the decreased DSP per gram testis at 20 µg/kg/day (NTP, 2001
).
In another study examining low-dose exposure, adult male offspring of female Wistar rats exposed to 1 ppm BPA (corresponding to approximately 0.10.4 mg/kg/day) in their drinking water for 8 to 9 weeks (during prebreed, mating, gestation, and lactation) were reported to exhibit significantly reduced testes weights (Sharpe et al., 1995). The results of this study were brought into question when the original authors could not reproduce their initial findings or other studies that had produced the same results in different chemicals (Sharpe et al., 1998
). The results of the initial study with BPA could also not be reproduced in another study using the same exposure route, timing, and strain of rat, but with a larger number of dose groups, more animals per dose, and more reproductive parameters (Cagen et al., 1999b
). The studies previously reported as positive usually had smaller numbers of animals, fewer doses, and/or parenteral routes of administration. Therefore, the present study was designed and performed to definitively evaluate the concerns for possible low-dose effects, for possible nonmonotonic ("inverted-u") dose-response curves, and for possible effects of exposure to BPA by a relevant route of administration during sensitive life stages (pre- and early postnatal), as well as postweaning peripubertal maturational stages, over 3 generations of offspring using an internationally accepted reproductive toxicity protocol under Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) regulations (U.S. EPA, 1989
).
Specifically, this study evaluated exposure of CD® (SD) rats (30/sex/group) to BPA administered in the diet ad libitum at 0, 0.015, 0.3, 4.5, 75, 750, and 7500 ppm (resulting in BPA intakes of 0.001, 0.02, 0.3, 5, 50, and 500 mg/kg/day) for 3 generations, 1 litter per generation, using the U.S. EPA OPPTS test guidelines (U.S. EPA OPPTS 837.3800, 1998). Additional assessments beyond the guideline requirements included a third offspring generation, 1 control and 6 treatment groups, examination for retained nipples and areolae in male F1, F2, and F3 preweanlings, and retention of F3 offspring until adulthood with continuing exposure, with histopathologic and andrological assessments at their termination.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The basic diet was Purina Certified Rodent Chow® (No. 5002, PMI Feeds, Inc., St. Louis, MO). Dosed diets were formulated by dissolving BPA in a fixed volume of acetone as separate stock solutions, 1 for each dietary dose. Each BPA-acetone stock solution was added to a premix feed aliquot. After evaporating the acetone, each premix was blended with additional feed to make the prescribed concentrations for each of the 17 formulation dates. Control diets were formulated as described above.
Stability of formulations at 15 ppb and 7500 and 10,000 ppm was confirmed at approximately -20°C for 50 days, and at room temperature in open containers to simulate cageside conditions for at least 9 days. Homogeneity was also confirmed by assaying 1 sample each at 15 ppb and 7500 and 10,000 ppm in triplicate from 3 locations within the blender. Aliquots from all dosed feed preparations were analyzed for BPA concentration, and the diet was used only if within the acceptable range (± 15% of the nominal). All analyses of the feed were performed using negative ion CI (chemical ionization) gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis. The estimated limit of detection was 0.00080.0018 ppm.
Formulated diets were stored at -20°C for up to 50 days in sealed containers. Feed was changed at least every 7 days.
Animals and husbandry.
The SD rat is recommended for use in reproductive and developmental toxicity testing by worldwide regulatory agencies such as the U.S. EPA, OECD, and Japanese MAFF. It was also chosen for this study because of the extensive historical database with this strain at RTI. Two hundred forty virgin female and male rats were ordered for the study. Ten/sex were used as quality controls for assessment of viral antibody status within 1 day after receipt, 8/sex were used as sentinels for monitoring of health status of study animals (with 2/sex each evaluated for viral antibody titers at the necropsy of F0, F1, F2, and F3 adults); 12/sex were available to replace any animals inappropriate for use, and 210/sex went on study. All viral antibody titer assessments for quality control and sentinel animals were negative.
At the end of the approximately 1-week quarantine period, all animals were in good health and were randomly distributed into 7 strata by sex and body weight. The rats within each stratum were then randomly assigned, 1 to each treatment group, using a random number table, and uniquely identified by eartag and animal study numbers. All selected weanling offspring were also identified by eartag and animal study numbers.
The animals were individually housed in stainless-steel hanging cages upon arrival, during the acclimation period, and upon the initiation of the treatment period. An automatic watering system was used for all animals during prebreed and for the males after mating during the holding period. Mating pairs (1 male:1 female) and sperm/plug positive females, from GD 0 until weaning of their litters on PND 21, were housed in solid-bottom polypropylene cages (Laboratory Products, Rochelle Park, NJ), with Sani-Chip® cage bedding (P. J. Murphy Forest Products, Inc., Montville, NJ) with glass water bottles. The caging, water bottles and sipper tubes, and storage containers for feed were made from materials that did not contain BPA to prevent any extraneous exposure of animals. Temperature (6479°F), 12-h light/dark cycle, and relative humidity (3070%) in the animal rooms were continuously monitored, controlled, and automatically recorded.
Purina Certified Ground Rodent Chow (No. 5002, PMI Feeds, Inc., St. Louis, MO) was available ad libitum, 7 days per week, 24 hours per day, throughout the study. The analyses of each feed batch for nutrient levels and possible contaminants were performed by the supplier. The supplier reported total isoflavone content (as aglycone equivalents) of 309.2 µg/g feed (range 290.0358.0 µg/g), of which genistein was 127.6 µg/g (113.0139.0 µg/g) and daidzein was 131.3 µg/g (114.0167.0 µg/g). Total protein content was 20.1%. For all feed batches, nutrient levels were at or above, and contaminant levels were below the certified levels, and therefore judged suitable for use. Water was available ad libitum by an automatic watering system during the time the animals were in hanging cages, and by water bottles during the time the animals were in solid-bottom cages. At all times, the regular analyses of the water showed that contaminants were below the maximum levels defined for drinking water.
Study design.
A graphic representation of the study design is presented in Figure 1. The study began with 30 males/group and 30 females/group (designated the F0 generation), to yield at least 20 pregnant females/group at or near term, and 7 groups (see Table 1
). The target dietary concentrations (0, 0.015, 0.3, 4.5, 75, 750, and 7500 ppm) were selected to provide BPA intakes of approximately 0.001, 0.02, 0.3, 5, 50, and 500 mg/kg/day, respectively, to encompass the ranges of low oral BPA doses (0.002 and 0.02 mg/kg/day) at which male mouse offspring prostate weights were reported to be significantly increased (Nagel et al., 1997
; vom Saal et al., 1998
), and of doses at which testis weight and efficiency of DSP were reported to be significantly reduced in rat offspring (Sharpe et al., 1995
). The dietary concentrations were also chosen to provide an MTD that is expected to exceed the metabolic capability of the adult liver and to produce reductions in body weight or other indications of systemic toxicity. The target dietary concentrations were based on the chosen BPA intakes in mg/kg/day for the female rats (Table 1
).
|
|
F1 litters were culled to 10 pups (with equal sex ratio, if possible) on PND 4, and F1 males were examined on PND 1113 for retained areolae and/or nipples. At weaning (PND 21), 30/sex/dose were then randomly selected as F1 parents of the F2 generation, and up to 3 remaining weanlings/sex/litter were randomly selected, necropsied, and selected organs weighed. All F0 females were necropsied and selected organs were weighed. The stage of estrus at necropsy and enumeration of ovarian primordial follicles (from step sections of both ovaries of ten females each at high dose and control) were determined, and histopathological examinations of reproductive and other selected organs (same as F0 males above) were performed.
Selected F1 weanlings were administered BPA in the diet for the exposure period as described above for the F0 generation. Acquisition of VP in F1 females and PPS in F1 males was determined during prebreed. Vaginal cytology for estrous cyclicity was evaluated during the last 3 weeks of prebreed. Since acquisition of puberty was delayed in F1 offspring at 7500 ppm, measurement of AGD was performed on all F2 and F3 offspring at birth (PND 0) using an ocular micrometer and eyepiece grid (precision = 0.2 mm). At weaning of F2 litters, the same procedure as described above was used to select the F2 parents of the F3 generation. All F1 males and females were necropsied, with histopathology as described above.
Randomly selected F2 weanlings were administered BPA in the diet for the exposure period as described above for the F0 and F1 generations. Acquisition of VP and PPS and evaluation of estrous cyclicity were performed as above for the F1 generation. They were then mated as described above to generate F3 litters. F2 parental animals were necropsied with histopathology as described above. At weaning of F3 litters, up to 3 weanlings/sex/litter were randomly selected and necropsied, and 30/sex/dose were randomly selected and retained until adulthood (up to 17 weeks), with exposures continuing, with acquisition of VP, PPS, and estrous cyclicity evaluated. At necropsy of these retained adult F3 offspring, they were evaluated as described above for F0, F1, and F2 parental animals.
Statistical analyses.
The unit of comparison was the individual animal or the litter, as appropriate. Data from the cohorts were combined for summarization and statistical analyses. See Figure 2 for a graphical representation and reference citations of the decision trees employed for the statistical analyses. Quantitative continuous data (e.g., parental and pup body weights, organ weights, feed consumption, AGD, etc.) were compared among the 6 treatment groups and the vehicle control group. For the litter-derived percentage data (e.g., periodic pup survival indices), the ANOVA was weighted according to litter size. General Linear Models (GLM) analysis was used to determine the significance of the dose-response relationship and to determine whether significant dosage effects had occurred for selected measures. A one-tailed test was used for all pairwise comparisons to the vehicle control group, except that a two-tailed test was used for parental and pup body weight and organ weight parameters, feed consumption, percent males per litter, and AGD per sex per litter (Figure 2A
).
|
For acquisition of developmental landmarks (e.g., VP and PPS) and AGD, ANOVA and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with body weight (at birth, PND 0, for AGD; at acquisition of puberty and on study day [SD] 7 for females [VP] and SD 14 for males [PPS]; see Discussion) as the covariate, were used for pairwise comparisons (Figure 2C). For correlated data (e.g., body and organ weights at necropsy of weanlings, with more than 1 pup/sex/litter), SUDAAN® software was used for analysis of overall significance, presence of trend, and pairwise comparisons to the control group values (Figure 2D
). For all statistical tests, the significance limit of 0.05 (one- or two-tailed) was used as the criterion for significance.
A test for statistical outliers (SAS, 1990b) was performed on parental body weights and feed consumption (in g/day) and parental and weanling offspring organ weights at necropsy. If examination of pertinent study data did not provide a plausible biologically sound reason (i.e., a reason that could not be ruled out as being within the possible range for the organ or measurement being made) for inclusion of the data flagged as "outlier," the data were excluded from summarization and analysis and were designated as outliers.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
|
|
Clinical observations.
There were no treatment- or dose-related clinical observations in either sex in any of the generations, except for transient evidence of dehydration at the start of the F0 prebreed in all groups, since some animals had difficulty adjusting to the automatic watering system, and at the start of the F1, F2, and F3 postwean (prebreed) exposure period at 7500 ppm, due to the small pups at this dose adjusting to the "nipples" of the automatic watering system, which was quickly resolved (data not presented).
Organ weights.
At necropsy, F0, F1, and F2 parental and F3 retained adult absolute nonreproductive organ weights were almost uniformly reduced for liver, kidneys, adrenal glands, spleen, pituitary, and brain at 7500 ppm (Table 2). Relative organ weights at 7500 ppm were typically significantly increased (or unaffected), with these effects most likely caused by reduced terminal body weights at this dietary dose. Changes in absolute and relative organ weights did occur rarely in other groups, but they were not consistent across generations and did not exhibit a dose-response pattern (Table 2
).
Histopathology.
There were no treatment- or dose-related gross or microscopic findings for the examined organs for F0, F1, and F2 parental animals, and for F3 retained adults at any concentration for either sex, except for slight to mild renal tubular degeneration and chronic hepatic inflammation observed at a higher incidence in F0, F1, and F2 (but not F3) females at 7500 ppm (Tables 3 and 4).
|
|
There were no effects of treatment in F0, F1, or F2 females on mating, fertility, pregnancy, or gestational indices, dead pups per litter, or percent postimplantation loss (prenatal mortality index; Table 5). Estrous cycle length in days was equivalent across all groups for F0, F1, F2, and F3 females. Paired ovarian primordial follicle counts were similar between the high dose and control F1, F2, and F3 females (and increased at 7500 ppm for F0 females). Precoital interval in days and gestational length in days were equivalent across all groups for all generations.
|
There were no treatment-related gross or microscopic findings in reproductive organs for F0, F1, F2, or F3 adult males or females in any group (Tables 3 and 4).
Presence of effects.
The only significant effects were seen primarily in the 7500 ppm group in both sexes. There were significantly reduced absolute paired ovary weights in F0, F1, F2, and F3 females and relative paired ovary weights in F0, F1, and F2 (but not F3) females at 7500 ppm, in the presence of significant systemic maternal toxicity (Table 2). The only observed effects in F0, F1, F2, and retained F3 males were consistently reduced absolute organ weights and increased (or unaffected) relative organ weights, caused by the reduced terminal body weights of the males at 750 and 7500 ppm. The number of implants, total pups, and live pups per litter at birth and on PND 4 precull were significantly reduced at 7500 ppm (500 mg/kg/day) for F1, F2, and F3 offspring (Tables 5 and 6
).
|
Presence of effects.
Pup body weights per litter were reduced at 7500 ppm for F1, F2, and F3 offspring for the lactational period, measured on PND 7, 14, and 21 (Fig. 5). For F1 litters, pup body weights per litter were also significantly reduced in the high dose group on PND 4 for all pups analyzed together, but not for sexes analyzed separately.
|
|
|
For F1, F2, and F3 weanling males and females sacrificed on PND 21, the absolute organ weights were decreased at 7500 ppm (the dietary concentration at which the terminal body weights were also decreased; data not shown). There were reductions in absolute organ weights at lower doses, but they were not consistently affected in F1, F2, and F3 weanlings or reproducible in specific dose groups. Relative organ weights were increased (or unaffected) at 7500 ppm (again, caused by reduced body weights at this dietary dose).
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Parental Systemic Parameters
Systemic toxicity effects in adult animals were limited to reductions in body weight, weight gain, and feed consumption in the top 2 doses (750 and 7500 ppm).
At 7500 ppm, there were consistent and persistent reductions in body weights and weight gains in both sexes and in F0, F1, F2, and F3 generations. Feed consumption in g/day and g/kg/day was variable and showed no clear treatment-related effects, nor were there treatment- or dose-related clinical observations in either sex in any generation. Body weights during gestation and lactation were significantly reduced in F0, F1, and F2 females at 7500 ppm, in F0 and F2 females at 750 ppm, and at 750 ppm in F1 females during lactation.
At necropsy, F0, F1, and F2 parental and F3 retained adult absolute organ weights were almost uniformly reduced for liver, kidneys, adrenal glands, spleen, pituitary, and brain at 7500 ppm. Relative organ weights at 7500 ppm were typically significantly increased, with both effects most likely caused by the reduced terminal body weights at this dietary dose. There were no treatment- or dose-related gross or microscopic findings for the examined organs in any parental animal, except for renal tubular degeneration and chronic hepatic inflammation observed at a higher incidence in F0, F1, and F2 (but not F3) females at 7500 ppm. There were no toxicologically significant effects on these parameters at 75 ppm or below.
Parental Reproductive Parameters
There were no effects of treatment in F0, F1, or F2 females on mating, fertility, pregnancy or gestational indices, dead pups per litter, or of percent postimplantation loss (prenatal mortality index). There were no treatment-related effects on absolute or relative reproductive organ weights, except for significantly reduced paired ovary weights (see below). Estrous cycle length in days was equivalent across all groups for F0, F1, F2, and F3 females. Paired ovarian primordial follicle counts were similar between the high dose and control F1, F2, and F3 females (but increased at 7500 ppm for F0 females). Precoital interval in days and gestational length in days were equivalent across all groups for all generations.
There were no effects of treatment in F0, F1, or F2 males on mating or fertility indices, or treatment- or dose-related direct effects in F0, F1, F2 and retained F3 males on absolute or relative weights of the testes, epididymides, prostate, or seminal vesicles plus coagulating glands. Also, there were no effects on epididymal sperm concentration (except for a significant reduction in epididymal sperm concentration in F1 males, but not F0, F2, and F3 males, at 7500 ppm), percent motile or progressively motile sperm, testicular homogenization-resistant spermatid head counts, DSP (except for a significant reduction in DSP at 7500 ppm for F3 males, but not F0, F1, or F2 males, with no effect on efficiency of DSP), or efficiency of DSP. Percent abnormal sperm was also unaffected for all F0, F1, F2, and F3 males in all groups. The slightly higher (but not statistically significant) values for F2 males at 0.015, 0.3, 4.5, and 75 ppm and for F3 males at 0.015 and 75 ppm were due to 1 or 2 males per group with few or no motile sperm and most or all abnormal sperm. In all cases for the F2 males, the affected males sired live litters (F3 males were not bred). There were no treatment-related gross or microscopic findings on reproductive organs for F0, F1, F2, or F3 adult males or females.
The vast majority of the relatively few effects observed for parental reproductive parameters occurred only at the highest dose of 7500 ppm. The number of implants, total pups, and live pups per litter at birth and on PND 4 precull were significantly reduced at 7500 ppm for F1, F2, and F3 offspring.
The explanation for the reduced live litter size at birth at 7500 ppm for F1, F2, and F3 offspring is not known. It is not due to the male since there is no evidence of reproductive effects on the males at 7500 ppm (or any other dietary dose), nor is it due to prenatal postimplantation loss of conceptuses, since postimplantation loss was unaffected at any dose for F0, F1, and F2 dams carrying F1, F2, and F3 litters. Preimplantation loss cannot be determined from this study design since, by the time the parental females are sacrificed, the ovarian corpora lutea of pregnancy (which form after ovulation) have involuted to corpora albicans, indistinguishable from corpora albicans from previous ovulation cycles. Although the absolute and relative paired ovarian weights were reduced in F0, F1, F2, and F3 (absolute only) females in the present study, there was no evidence of reduced ovarian primordial follicle counts at 7500 ppm in any generation, even in the presence of significant systemic maternal toxicity.
There were no significant histopathological findings for any reproductive organ in either sex at any dose in any generation.
Offspring Parameters
As in the parental animals, the vast majority of the relatively few effects observed for offspring parameters occurred only at the highest dose of 7500 ppm.
Body weights.
Effects on body weights were also observed in offspring only at 7500 ppm, beginning on PND 7 and continuing through lactation, weaning, and the postweaning period to adulthood in all 3 generations (F1, F2, and F3). The reduced body weight in periweanlings at 7500 ppm and in older animals at 750 and 7500 ppm, in all generations, was most likely the cause of the reduced absolute organ weights in F1, F2, and F3 weanlings; F1, F2, and F3 adults; and consistent with the increased (or absence of an effect on) relative organ weights at these dietary doses.
Organ weights.
Absolute and relative organ weight data for F1, F2, and F3 weanling (PND 21) pups indicate that for all but the ovaries, the absolute organ weights were reduced, and the relative organ weights were increased or unaffected in all groups, including 750 and 7500 ppm, at which postweaning body weights were significantly reduced. For paired ovary weights, the effects in the F1, F2, and F3 female weanlings at 7500 ppm paralleled effects observed in the F0, F1, and F2 adult females (both absolute and relative weights were reduced) and in the F3 adult females (only absolute ovary weights were reduced). For F1, F2, and F3 males and females, the absolute organ weight changes were decreased at 7500 ppm (the dietary concentration at which the terminal body weights were also decreased). At 7500 ppm, there were reductions in absolute and relative paired ovarian weights (absolute in F1, F2, and F3 females; relative in F1 and F2, but not F3, females). Statistical analysis of ovary weight, covaried by body weight at necropsy (Fig. 6A), indicated consistent effects only at 7500 ppm. Similarly, testis weight covaried by body weight at necropsy (Fig. 6B
) indicated effects only in the F3 generation (the generation not mated), with no effects in the F0, F1, or F2 generation males.
|
In accordance with current thinking on absolute and relative organ weights, when terminal body weights are reduced, only those organ weight parameters that exhibit statistically significant differences in the same direction for both absolute and relative values are considered biologically important and directly treatment related. Therefore, the changes in relative F1, F2, and F3 male and female weanling organ weights were not considered to be biologically significant and were most likely secondary to the decreased body weights. The difference in effects on weanling versus adult animals is likely the result of the very high dietary intakes (greater than 750 [7861205] mg/kg/day) of the test material being consumed by the weanling animals in the high dose group (in their first postwean exposure week). These intakes are approximately 1.5 to 2 times the daily intakes in the adults at the same dose (less than 575 [534570] mg/kg/day, during the last prebreed exposure week immediately prior to mating). BPA intakes in Table 1 and for F1 postwean males and females in Figures 3B, 3D, and 4
indicate that the maximum exposure to BPA, in mg/kg/day for all animals during all phases of the study, was during the first week of prebreed for the pups (when they were small and in a growth spurt) and the last week of lactation for the dams (where there could have been a substantial contribution from pups self feeding).
Total and live pups per litter.
Also, only at 7500 ppm were there reduced total and live litter sizes on PND 0. The explanation for the reduced number of total and live pups per litter at birth at 7500 ppm for F1, F2, and F3 offspring is not known. It is not due to effects on males, since there is no evidence of reproductive effects on the males at 7500 ppm (or any other dietary dose). It is not due to prenatal postimplantation loss of conceptuses, since postimplantation loss was not affected at any dose for F0, F1, and F2 dams carrying F1, F2, and F3 litters. Preimplantation loss cannot be determined from this study design, since by the time the parental females are sacrificed (at the weaning of their litters), the ovarian corpora lutea of pregnancy (which form after ovulation) have involuted to corpora albicans, indistinguishable from corpora albicans from previous ovulation cycles. The possibilities, therefore, exist that there were increased preimplantation loss and/or fewer eggs ovulated at 7500 ppm. Although the absolute and relative paired ovarian weights were reduced in F0, F1, F2, and F3 (absolute only) females in this study, there was no evidence of reduced ovarian primordial follicle counts at 7500 ppm in any generation.
Biegel et al. (1998a) also reported reduced live litter sizes associated with reduced number of implantations per litter (the latter was not observed in the present study) at 2.5 ppm dietary E2, but did not offer an explanation. In the present study, dams at 7500 ppm exhibited profound reductions in body weight and weight gain, which is at least consistent with effects of profound maternal systemic toxicity as causative per se.
Acquisition of Pubertal Characteristics
VP and PPS.
Reduced body weights are also most likely the cause of the significant delay in acquisition of puberty in both sexes (age at acquisition of VP in females and PPS in males), observed in all offspring generations at 7500 ppm, using ANCOVA with body weight at acquisition as the covariate. Analysis of the ages at acquisition alone (by nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests) did result in significant delays at lower doses (rarely and not consistently), but the values were not significant with ANCOVA (Fig. 7).
Body weight at acquisition was significantly reduced at 7500 ppm for F1 males and females and for F2 and F3 males with ANCOVA. However, acquisition of developmental landmarks is dependent on both age and weights, i.e., heavier animals acquire the landmark earlier, while lighter animals acquire the landmark later. However, lighter animals do eventually acquire the landmark (unless there is another cause for the delay) and in many cases acquire the landmark at the same or lighter weight than the heavier animals, but at an older age (e.g., Carney et al., 1998; Kennedy and Mitra, 1963
). All animals in this study acquired puberty. The lighter animals acquired puberty at a later time (older age). Most of them were comparable in weight at the time of acquisition to the control (and lower dose groups) animals that acquired puberty at an earlier time (and thus, a younger age).
There is much discussion among reproductive toxicologists as to the most appropriate body weight to use as a covariate for ANCOVA other than that at acquisition. We covaried age at acquisition of puberty both by the body weight at acquisition (to standardize pup weights to the same physiologic state; i.e., puberty regardless of age) and by the body weight on a prebreed study day, encompassing the time of acquisition (i.e., SD 7 for females and SD 14 for males) to standardize pup weights to the same age, regardless of physiologic state.
To use the body weights on SD 7 and 14 as the covariate for age at acquisition of puberty, we established that the ages for each group on the chosen study day, within each generation, were equivalent (by ANOVA), and that the variances (i.e., the distributions) also did not differ (by Levene's test). The results for the covariate analyses by body weight on SD 7 (females) or SD 14 (males) are presented in Table 6. The ANCOVA analyses resulted in essentially the same findings, regardless of which body weight was employed as the covariate, which is consistent with the reduced body weights in both sexes in all 3 offspring generations throughout their respective prebreed periods at 7500 ppm.
Since acquisition of both landmarks in both sexes of both generations was delayed, these results are probably not caused by estrogen receptor-mediated events or other endocrine-related toxicity. The only endocrine-mediated mechanism currently known to result in delays in puberty in both sexes would be interference with steroidogenesis, thereby reducing testosterone (and DHT) levels in males and estrogen levels in females, and there is no evidence that BPA interferes with steroidogenesis in rats. It is most likely that the delays in puberty in both sexes at 7500 ppm were caused by reduced body weights prior to and at acquisition in all offspring generations.
This interpretation is consistent with the recognition by the U.S. EPA (1996, p. 56295) that "body weight at puberty may provide a means to separate specific delays in puberty from those that are related to general delays in development." The delays in VP in females and in PPS in males at 7500 ppm in this study were relatively minor: 2.5 (F1, F3) and 3.5 (F2) days for females and 3.1 (F3), 3.9 (F1), and 5.8 (F2) days for males (the delay in acquisition in F1 males at 750 ppm was 1.7 days). Biegel et al. (1998a,b) have shown that dietary administration of E2 at 0.05 and 2.5 ppm resulted in accelerated VP (by 7 days) in CD (SD) rats.
AGD.
The significant effect on acquisition of reproductive landmarks in F1 and F2 offspring required a measurement of AGD in newborn F2 and F3 offspring, as specified in the guidelines (U.S. EPA, 1998). AGDs in newborn F2 and F3 males were statistically equivalent across all groups at PND 0. In the newborn F2 females, AGD was statistically significantly longer at 0.015, 0.3, 4.5 (not 75), and 750 (not 7500) ppm, with mean values of 0.98, 0.98, 0.98, and 0.99 mm, respectively, relative to the control group mean value of 0.95 mm (and 0.97 mm at 75 ppm and 0.96 mm at 7500 ppm; Figs. 8A and 8B
). These effects were increases in AGD of only 0.030.04 mm, equivalent to increases of only 3.164.21%. They were also present only at doses where the mean F2 female body weights per litter were slightly, but not statistically significantly, higher than in the control group and in the groups with unaffected AGDs; body weights, per se, are known to affect AGD (Gallavan et al., 1999
). These small differences (0.030.04 mm), especially since the AGDs for F3 female pups in all groups were statistically equivalent, are considered of no biological significance because the magnitude of the differences is minimal, all mean values round to 1.0 mm, and these changes, along with the similarly minor delays in acquisition of PPS and VP, are not associated with any alterations in reproductive organ structures or function in the animals exhibiting them. In addition, AGD is under androgenic control, specifically dihydrotestosterone (Gray et al., 1998
; Gray and Ostby, 1998
) and is not affected by estrogens (Biegel et al., 1998a
). BPA was shown to be neither an androgen nor antiandrogen in vivo (Laudenbach et al., 2001
). Therefore, the effects reported on F2 female AGD are considered of no biological significance and not due to BPA exposure.
Comparisons across Generations
One of the possible analyses that can be done with a multigeneration dataset is to characterize an effect (or lack thereof) across generations. This is permitted if 2 important statistical criteria are met: the control groups are not statistically different and there is no interaction between dose and generation, i.e., a dose x generation interaction.
To determine if it was appropriate for data across generations to be pooled, a two-way ANOVA was performed for organ weights (such as epididymides, testis, and ovaries), developmental landmarks (VP and PPS), and AGD. The results showed that several parameters could be pooled and several could not be pooled. For testis and epididymides weights, there were significant differences between F1 and F3 controls (p = 0.0004) and between F2 and F3 controls (p = 0.0001), respectively. This is understandable since the F3 animals were younger, had less total exposure duration to BPA, and had never been mated.
For daily sperm production, there were significant differences between the F1 controls and both F2 (p = 0.0048) and F3 (p = 0.0005) controls. This was understandable since the F1 generation controls had a lower epididymal sperm concentration but a higher spermatid head concentration than the other generations, which caused the DSP and efficiency of daily sperm production to be higher than the other generations. For ovary weight, the results (p = 0.0007) of the ANOVA for interaction showed that there was a significant dose x generation effect. Based on these results, the generations could not be pooled for epididymides, testis, or ovary weights or for DSP. Thus, the only statistically valid comparisons for these parameters were between doses for each individual generation and its concomitant control.
For PPS, VP, and AGD for both males and females, there were no statistical differences among control groups (for PPS, p = 0.8797; for VP, p = 0.1848; for AGD male, p = 0.7262; for AGD female, p = 0.3181). This is also understandable since the animals were all covaried with body weight at the same study day (SD 7 for females and SD 14 for males), were statistically the same age on that date (no statistical differences in the distribution of ages among groups), and had the same range of total exposure durations to BPA across groups. Thus, the data for these 3 parameters could be pooled.
The pooled data (n = 385 litters; dose and dose x generation df = 6) from both F2 and F3 generations for male AGD showed the same results as did the individual generations when compared to their concomitant controls (i.e., there were no effects of BPA at any dose in any generation or across generations). For pooled female AGD (n = 385 litters; dose and dose x generation df = 6), none of the values differed more than 0.04 mm from the control value, although 3 were statistically significant (at 0.3, 750, and 7500 ppm). None of the individual values for female AGD for the F3 generation differed more than 0.04 mm from the control value (as with the pooled values), and none of these 6 dose group values were statistically different from its concomitant control value. None of the F2 values differed more than 0.04 mm from the control values, yet 4 of the 6 doses were statistically significant. Biologically, the difference of 0.04 mm is insignificant and most likely due to the exceptionally well-controlled micrometric measurement techniques for AGD (all standard errors were within 0.02 mm of the mean).
The pooling (n = 626; dose and dose x generation df = 6) of the PPS data across all 3 offspring generations created a statistically significant difference at 0.3 ppm, which was not present in any of the individual generations. No other dose below 750 ppm in any generation or in the pooled data was significant. Thus, this finding was considered to be an anomaly and not biologically meaningful.
The pooled data (n = 627; dose and dose x generation df = 6) from all 3 offspring generations for VP showed the same results as the data from the individual generations when compared to their concomitant controls, i.e., there were no effects of BPA at any dose in any generation or across generations other than at the highest dose of 7500 ppm.
Based on the results of the statistical tests for the pooled data, pooling the data did not lend any more insight into interpretation of the data than did just comparing individual generations with their concomitant controls.
Other Research and Routes of Exposure in Rat Reproductive Toxicity Evaluations
Absence of effects.
Welsch and colleagues (Elswick et al., 2000; Welsch et al., 2000
, 2001
) reported that exposure of CD (SD) female rats (1316 pregnancies/group) to BPA in drinking water at 0, 0.005, 0.5, 5, or 50 mg/l from GD 2 through PND 21 (with intakes of
0.001 to
10 mg/kg/day) resulted in no effects on differentiation and function of the reproductive system in female (Welsch et al., 2000
) or male (Elswick et al., 2000
) F1 offspring when evaluated through 10 months of age. In F1 females, there were no effects of BPA on fertility, fecundity, organ weights, AGD, VP, age at first estrus, estrous cyclicity, ovarian follicle counts, or lordosis. The positive control DES (at 0.05 mg/l) did cause accelerated VP and age at first estrus in females. In F1 males, there were no effects of BPA on AGD, PPS, organ weights, hormone levels, sperm counts, fertility, immunohistochemically measured ventral prostate AR levels, and no treatment-related histopathological changes.
Other researchers have also reported no effect of exposure to BPA at low doses. Kwon et al. (2000) administered BPA by gavage to pregnant CD (SD) rats at 0, 3.2, 32, or 320 mg/kg/day from GD 11 through PND 20. DES at 15 µg/kg/day was employed as a positive control. Offspring female pubertal development was unaffected by indirect BPA exposure at any dose. There were also no effects on the volume of the sexually dimorphic nucleus of the preoptic area (SDN-POA) of the brain in 10-day-old offspring females, on estrous cyclicity, on sexual behavior of the offspring females at 4 months of age, or on offspring male reproductive organ weights at 6 months of age (including testis, epididymis, seminal vesicle, and ventral and dorsolateral prostate lobes). DES increased the volume of the SDN-POA in offspring females and caused irregular estrous cyclicity.
Ema et al. (2001) from the Chemical Compound Safety Research Institute in Hokkaido, Japan, administered BPA in distilled water by gavage (stomach tube) to Crj:CD (SD) rats, 25/sex/dose at 0, 0.2, 2, 20, and 200 µg/kg/day. This study, like the present study, was conducted under GLP regulations and was compliant with the U.S. EPA testing guidelines (U.S. EPA, OPPTS, 837.3800, 1998). The Ema study also included endocrine-sensitive measurements and neurobehavioral endpoints, evaluating functional development in F1 and F2 offspring (open field motor activity and Morris water maze learning and memory tests), and various serum hormone concentrations in F0 and F1 parental animals and retention of F2 weanlings. Thirty-seven animals per sex per group (25 from the main study and 12 from "satellite groups") were evaluated until adulthood, including gross necropsy, organ weights, and histopathology for F2 males and estrous cyclicity and gross necropsy for F2 females. The authors concluded that "oral doses of BPA of between 0.2 and 200 µg/kg administered over two generations did not cause significant compound-related changes in reproductive or developmental parameters in rats" (Ema et al., 2001, p. 522). These conclusions are supported by our findings of no biologically relevant effects of BPA below 5 mg/kg/day in any generation in either sex.
Nagao et al. (1999) administered BPA by sc injection to rat pups on PND 15 at 300 µg/g (300 mg/kg/day) and reported no effects on male or female reproductive development or on adult offspring reproductive structures or functions. Estradiol benzoate was also administered by the same route and timing to a separate group and caused clear effects in male and female reproductive development and in reproductive structures and functions.
Atanassova et al. (2000) and Williams et al. (2001) showed that Wistar rats treated neonatally with a range of doses (0.0110 µg; equivalent to 1.0 µg1.0 mg/kg in a 10-g neonatal rat pup) of DES on alternate days from PND 2 to 12 developed a dose-dependent retardation of pubertal spermatogenesis on day 18, as evidenced by decreases in testis weight, seminiferous tubule lumen formation, spermatocyte nuclear volume per unit Sertoli cell, and elevation of the germ cell apoptotic index. The 2 lowest doses of DES (0.1 and 0.01 µg) significantly increased spermatocyte nuclear volume per unit Sertoli cell. Similarly, daily treatment on PND 212 with BPA (0.5 mg; equivalent to 50 mg/kg in a 10 g neonatal rat pup) significantly advanced this and some of the other aspects of pubertal spermatogenesis. In adulthood, testis weight was decreased dose dependently in rats treated neonatally with DES, but only the lowest dose group (0.01 µg) showed evidence of mating (3 of 6) and normal fertility (3 litters). Animals treated neonatally with BPA had increased testis weights and exhibited "reasonably normal" mating/fertility (Attanassova et al., 2000, pp. 3898 and 3904). The authors concluded that the effect of high doses of BPA on the first wave of spermatogenesis at puberty was "essentially benign" (Attanassova et al., 2000, pp. 3898 and 3908). Furthermore, this group concluded that weak environmental estrogens in general are "unlikely to pose a significant risk to the reproductive system of the developing human male unless the compound in question also possesses some other biological activity of relevance" (Williams et al., 2001, p. 245).
Rubin et al. (2001) reported no effects on the number of pups per litter, sex ratio, day of VP, AGD, and no significant histopathological findings in offspring of rats (SD) exposed to BPA in drinking water to approximately 0.1 and 1.2 mg/kg/day from GD 6 through lactation. Kubo et al. (2001) showed that a BPA dose of 1.5 mg/kg/day in drinking water to 10 female Wistar rats during pregnancy and lactation produced no differences between organ weights (testis, epididymis, ventral prostate, ovaries, uterus) and serum hormone levels (LH, FSH, testosterone, or 17ß-estradiol) in offspring at 12 weeks of age, when compared to the control group values. Ramos et al. (2001) reported no effects on litter size, male or female pup body weight, sex ratios, or AGD following exposure to 25 µg/kg/day and 250 µg/kg/day of BPA dissolved in DMSO administered by continuous sc infusion via osmotic pump from GD 8 to PND 23 to pregnant Wistar rats (4 dams/group).
The data presented above from other laboratories for BPA administered by various routes of exposure are consistent with the findings from the present study, which indicated no effects of BPA at 0.0015 mg/kg/day (i.e., at low doses) when administered in the feed.
Presence of effects.
Still others have reported effects of BPA exposure in rats, usually by some nonstandard means of dose delivery, such as via continuous sc infusion by implanted osmotic minipumps or at relatively high doses. Steinmetz et al. (1997) exposed Fischer (F344) and SD rats to BPA (approximate dose of 220225 µg/kg/day) or E2 (approximate dose of 67.5 µg/kg/day), using silastic implants for 3 days. With BPA, F344 rats showed an increase in serum prolactin levels and hyperprolactinemia but showed no effect on anterior pituitary weight. There were no effects on either endpoint with the SD rat. E2 produced hyperprolactinemia in both strains of rat, but produced an increase in anterior pituitary weight in only the F344 rat. Stoker et al. (1999) reported that BPA, given to male (prepubertal) Wistar rat pups on PND 2232 by sc injections of 0 or 50 mg/kg once daily, stimulated increased secretion of prolactin during the dosing period and increased mean lateral prostate weight and inflammation of the lateral lobes of the prostate at 120 days of age. Tohei et al. (2001) also reported increased serum prolactin and increased plasma concentrations of luteinizing hormone in male Wistar rats exposed to 1 mg/kg BPA via sc injection for 2 weeks.
Chahoud and his colleagues (Fialkowski and Chahoud, 2000; Schönfelder et al., 2001
; Talsness and Chahoud, 2000
; Wu and Chahoud, 2000
) exposed pregnant SD rats to BPA by gavage on GD 621 at doses of 0, 0.02, 0.1, and 50 mg/kg (1120 litters/group) and reported various effects of sexual development in the offspring. However, the NTP Environmental Disrupters Low-Dose Peer Review Statistics Subpanel indicated that a "severe design deficiency" of absence of a concurrent control group precluded "statistical reanalysis of the data" [and] "any reliable assessment of the effects" reported for BPA by this group (NTP, 2001
, Appendix A, p. A-58).
Rubin et al. (2001) reported increased body weight gain in offspring of SD rats exposed to BPA in drinking water to approximately 0.1 and 1.2 mg/kg/day from GD 6 through lactation. They also reported altered patterns of estrous cyclicity and lowered plasma LH levels in the high-dose BPA group. Kubo et al. (2001) showed that a BPA dose of 1.5 mg/kg/day in drinking water to 10 female Wistar rats during pregnancy and lactation produced similar results at weeks 6 and 7 in offspring (5/sex/litter) for movement, passive avoidance patterns, and size of the locus coeruleus (7 rats total/sex for BPA, 6 rats/sex for control at week 20). In the control group, females showed a higher activity, lower avoidance memory, and larger locus coeruleus than the males.
Ramos et al. (2001) reported that both 25 µg/kg/day and 250 µg/kg/day of BPA, dissolved in DMSO administered by continuous sc infusion via osmotic pump from GD 8 to PND 23 to pregnant Wistar rats (4 dams/group), produced an effect on the proliferation and differentiation of epithelial and stromal cells in the ventral prostate (up to 4 rats/litter). This was expressed as an increase in the fibroblast:smooth muscle cell ratios and a decrease in the AR-positive cells of the periductal stroma.
Takahashi and Oishi (2001) reported that young (4 weeks of age) F344 rats (8/group), given dietary concentrations of 0, 234, 466, and 950 mg/kg/day of BPA for 44 days, had decreased body weight, food consumption, and liver weight at 466 and 950 mg/kg/day and increased kidney weight at all 3 doses. Seminal vesicle and dorsolateral prostate gland weights were decreased at only 950 mg/kg/day, and seminal vesicle weight was decreased at all BPA doses. Although there were no effects on testis, epididymides, or ventral prostate gland weight at any BPA dose, histopathological examination of the testes revealed seminiferous tubule degeneration and loss of elongated spermatid in a dose-dependent fashion at all doses.
Many of the effects observed by the above authors were from BPA administered by various parenteral (non-oral) routes, versus the present study with BPA administered in the diet, or were endpoints not directly evaluated in the present study. Results from the present study do confirm effects on body and systemic (but not reproductive or accessory sex) organ weights at high doses (750 and 7500 ppm).
Strain Differences
One recent, recurring concern is the possible differential responsiveness of various rat (and mouse) strains to endocrine-active compounds. Diel et al. (2001a) reported that ovariectomized female Wistar, SD, and DaHan rats responded differently in a uterotrophic assay to the oral administration of a positive control, ethinyl estradiol (Wistar = DaHan > SD), and BPA (SD = Wistar > DaHan) after 3 days of dosing. Diel et al. (2001b) also evaluated the same 3 rat strains for a uterotrophic response to a number of chemicals, and reported "all analyzed rat strains respond with a comparable sensitivity to phyto- and xenoestrogen treatment" (Diel et al., 2001b, p. 590).
Steinmetz et al. (1997) reported that a 3-day exposure to BPA, using silastic implants, resulted in increased serum prolactin levels and hyperprolactinemia in F344 but not SD rats.
Long et al. (2001) found no strain differences between ovariectomized F344 and SD rats (four/group) exposed to BPA by a single ip injection at doses of 0.02 to 150 mg/kg. In both strains, BPA elevated vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) mRNA expression in the vagina and uterus at 37.5 and 150 mg/kg, respectively. The anterior pituitary weight was unaffected in either strain. E2 produced hyperprolactinemia in both strains, and anterior pituitary weight was increased only in the F344 rat.
The Wistar rat has been shown to be sensitive to gestational and lactational exposure to the positive control, DES, in drinking water (Cagen et al., 1999b; Sharpe et al., 1995
). The CD (SD) rat was appropriately sensitive to E2 at low concentrations in the diet in a 1-generation reproduction study (Biegel et al., 1998a
,b
). It appears that the differential sensitivity, if any, of various rat strains depends on the test chemical used and the endpoints evaluated. However, the CD (SD) rat appears to be a very good model for detecting endocrine-sensitive effects in a transgenerational study design, especially with a powerful historical control database. The performing laboratory has recently confirmed the sensitivity of the CD (SD) rat to dietary E2 and to dietary butylbenzyl phthalate (BBP), an antiandrogen (Tyl, unpublished observations).
Possible explanation of differences in routes of exposure.
The results of studies that produced effects, even those that did not evaluate reproductive and developmental endpoints or used other strains of rats or other species, can be better understood by considering the qualitatively and quantitatively different responses to different routes of BPA administration. Jekat et al. (2000), Yamasaki et al. (2000), and Matthews et al. (2001) showed that oral administration required much higher doses to produce a uterotrophic effect than did sc injection. Doses in Jekat et al. (2000) and Matthews et al. (2001) ranged from 0.002 to 800 mg/kg for 3 consecutive days in groups of 10 immature Wistar strain-derived rats. Indications of estrogenicity were reported at doses of 200 mg/kg/day and above following oral dosing and at doses 20-fold lower (10 mg/kg/day and above) following sc injection. Yamasaki et al. (2000) reported increased uterine weight in SD rats following three consecutive daily BPA doses of 8 mg/kg/day and higher with sc injection, or of 160 mg/kg/day and higher with oral exposure. Kim et al. (2001) also reported only weak in vivo estrogenic activity in rats following oral administration of 100 mg/kg/day in a similar uterotrophic study design.
Pottenger et al. (2000) showed that there was a clear route dependency in the toxicokinetics and metabolism of 14C-labeled BPA after a single oral gavage, ip, or sc dose of either 10 or 100 mg/kg to F344 rats. The relative bioavailability of BPA and the plasma radioactivity were markedly lower after oral administration (Cmax values were 1 to 2 orders of magnitude lower) as compared to sc or ip administration, thus providing an explanation for the apparent route differences in effects observed for BPA in rats.
Following a single oral dose of 10 mg/kg, greater than 95% of the BPA was immediately glucuronidated in the intestine and the liver and rapidly excreted in the urine (Pottenger et al., 2000). Circulating plasma levels of 14C-BPA (detected by GC/MS) were undetectable at 0.083 h at 10 mg/kg/day and at 0.75 h at 100 mg/kg/day in the male, and after 1 h at 10 mg/kg/day and 18 h at 100 mg/kg/day in the female (limits of quantitation for low and high dose blood samples were 0.01 and 0.1 µg BPA/g blood [10 and 100 ppb], respectively). The major metabolite was confirmed as BPA monoglucuronide (Pottenger et al., 2000
), which has been shown to have no estrogenic or antiestrogenic activity (i.e., does not bind to ER
or ERß) in vitro (Matthews et al., 2001
; Snyder et al., 2000
).
The quantitative differences in effects observed from parenteral versus oral routes of administration, due to the rapid monoglucuronidation of BPA in the intestine and liver after oral administration and the lack of activity of the BPA monoglucuronide, provide an explanation for the results of the present study, i.e., no treatment-related effects at or below 5 mg/kg/day, and systemic toxicity effects only at or above 50 mg/kg/day.
Possible Contributing Factors to Delivered Dose of BPA
Placental transfer.
There is limited evidence for placental transfer in rats (Takahashi and Oishi, 2000). BPA at 1000 mg/kg (in propylene glycol), administered by gavage to pregnant F344 rats on GD 18, was rapidly absorbed and distributed into maternal and fetal tissues (maximal concentration 20 min postdosing) and also rapidly cleared. Maternal levels decreased to 25% of the maximum by 6 h postdosing (fetal levels were comparably reduced). Relative to the administered dose, the maximum level in maternal blood was 0.007%, 0.083% in liver, and 0.017% in kidney; the maximum level in the fetus was 0.004% of administered dose.
Lactational transfer.
There is also limited evidence for lactational transfer in rats (Gould et al., 1998). In a preliminary study, BPA was identified in milk and pups after BPA was administered in the dams' drinking water. A more recent study (Snyder et al., 2000
) gave 14C-BPA (ring labeled) at 100 mg/kg by gavage to lactating dams. Radiolabel was detected in the milk, with maximum levels 1 h postdosing (0.95 µg equiv./ml, down to approximately 1/3 of maximal, 0.26 µg equiv./ml, by 26 h). Radiolabel was also detected in pup carcasses beginning at 2 h postdosing, 44.3 µg equiv./kg (with approximately 2x more detected at 24 h, 78.4 µg equiv./kg), i.e., slower uptake and longer retention in the pups. The identity of the radiolabel was BPA monoglucuronide in both the milk and the pups.
Pup self-feeding.
During the lactational period, maternal feed consumption is maximal in the rat, but is confounded by pups self-feeding (Cripps and Williams, 1975; Hanley and Watanabe, 1985
; Shirley, 1984
). At about PND 10, feed can be detected in the stomachs of SD rat pups (Tyl, unpublished observations). Feed is detected in F-344 rat pup stomachs beginning on PND 18 during a 28-day lactation (Hanley and Watanabe, 1985
). The size of pups during lactation, relative to that of adult animals, and the data from Hanley and Watanabe (1985), which indicate that during the last week of lactation the pups ingest 38% more feed than the dam on a g/kg basis (140.3/101.5), are consistent with the present authors' estimation that during the last week of lactation (PND 1421), approximately 3040% of the feed intake, on a g/kg/day basis (and therefore BPA intake on a mg/kg/day basis), designated as maternal intake is, in fact, pup intake. Test material exposure is therefore significantly underestimated for pups during the last week of lactation and overestimated for dams during this period in F344 (Hanley and Watanabe, 1985
) and in CD (SD) rats (Shirley, 1984
).
The embryo/fetus and the nursing pup are therefore exposed to BPA/BPA-monoglucuronide during these sensitive life stages from the continuous high dietary BPA exposure to the dam.
Hormonal activity.
As noted earlier, BPA has been reported to have weak, estrogen-like activity in some in vitro screening assays (Gaido et al., 1997; Krishnan et al., 1993
; Kuiper et al., 1997
, 1998
; Maruyama et al., 1999
). Based on the in vitro assay results, one might expect BPA to exhibit effects in vivo similar to those for the natural estrogen, E2. However, it does not. A comparison of the current study data with a recent 1-generation study with exposure of rats to E2, at concentrations of 0.05, 2.5, 10, and 50 ppm in the diet (Biegel et al., 1998a
,b
), gave the following results, as presented in Table 7
. Except for reduced ovarian weights and reduced F1 offspring litter size at birth in the highest dose in the presence of significant systemic maternal toxicity, BPA did not act like E2.
|
There has been recent concern that BPA may exhibit weak antiandrogen activity, although Laudenbach et al. (2001) reported no androgenic or antiandrogenic activity of BPA in vivo or in vitro; therefore, the current study data were compared to data from a recent study by McIntyre et al. (2001) in which flutamide, an antiandrogen, was administered to rat dams by gavage on GD 1221 at 0, 6.25, 12.5, 25, or 50 mg/kg/day. F1 male offspring were examined for various androgen-mediated endpoints throughout life (Table 8). BPA did not affect any of the androgen-mediated endpoints affected by flutamide. Therefore, BPA does not behave as a classic estrogen or as an antiandrogen, based on the data from other laboratories and from the present study.
|
In this study, BPA exhibited normal dose-response relationships across the entire dose range of 0.015 ppm (1 µg/kg/day) to 7500 ppm (500 mg/kg/day). BPA did not produce low-dose effects in an exposure scenario where animals were given ad libitum access to dietary concentrations of BPA, encompassing sensitive life stages (pre- and early postnatal development) and maturational portions of the life cycle, over 3 offspring generations. The results of this study do not support the hypothesis of low doses of BPA (at 1 µg/kg/day5 mg/kg/day) causing adverse effects during any stage of the life cycle, including sensitive perinatal and peripubertal developmental periods, because there were only sporadic and obviously nontreatment-related effects observed across doses and generations.
The adult systemic toxicity no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) was identified at 75 ppm ( 5 mg/kg/day), and the reproductive and offspring toxicity NOAELs were 750 ppm (
50 mg/kg/day). Based on the absence of reproductive and developmental effects in offspring in this study, at doses where there was no significant maternal systemic toxicity, BPA should not be considered a selective reproductive or developmental toxicant.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
NOTES |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Armitage, P. (1955). Test for linear trends in proportions and frequencies. Biometrics 11, 375386.[ISI]
Ashby, J., and Tinwell, H. (1998). Uterotrophic activity of bisphenol A in the immature rat. Environ. Health Perspect. 106(11), 719720.[ISI][Medline]
Ashby, J., Tinwell, H., and Haseman, J. (1999). Lack of effects for low dose levels of bisphenol A and diethylstilbestrol on the prostate gland of CF1 mice exposed in utero. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 30, 156166.[ISI][Medline]
Atanassova, N., McKinnell, C., Turner, K. J., Walker, M., Fisher, J. S., Morley, M., Millar, M. R., Groome, N. P., and Sharpe, R. M. (2000). Comparative effects of neonatal exposure of male rats to potent and weak (environmental) estrogens on spermatogenesis at puberty and the relationship to adult testis size and fertility: Evidence for stimulatory effects of low estrogen levels. Endocrinology 141, 38983907.
Biegel, L. B., Cook, J. C., Hurtt, M. E., and O'Connor, J. C. (1998a). Effects of 17 ß-estradiol on serum hormone concentrations and estrous cycle in female Crl:CD BR rats: Effects on parental and first generation rats. Toxicol. Sci. 44, 143154.[Abstract]
Biegel, L. B., Flaws, J. A., Hirshfield, A. N., O'Connor, J. C., Elliott, G. S., Ladics, G. S., Silbergeld, E. K., Van Pelt, C. S., Hurtt, M. E., Cook, J. C., and Frame, S. R. (1998b). 90-day feeding and one-generation reproduction study in Crl:CD BR rats with 17 ß-estradiol. Toxicol. Sci.44, 116142.[Abstract]
Cagen, S. Z., Waechter J. M., Jr., Dimond, S. S., Breslin, W. J., Butala, J. H., Jekat, F. W., Joiner, R.L., Shiotsuka, R. N., Veenstra, G. E., and Harris, L. R. (1999a). Normal reproductive development in CF-1 mice following prenatal exposure to bisphenol A. Toxicol. Sci. 50, 3644.[Abstract]
Cagen, S. Z., Waechter J. M. Jr., Dimond, S. S., Breslin, W. J., Butala, J. H., Jekat, F. W., Joiner, R. L., Shiotsuka, R. N., Veenstra, G. E., and Harris, L. R. (1999b). Normal reproductive organ development in Wistar rats exposed to bisphenol A in the drinking water. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 30, 130139.[ISI][Medline]
Carney, E. W., Scortichini, B. S., and Crissman, J. W. (1998). Feed restriction during in utero and neonatal life: Effects on reproductive and developmental end points in the CD rat. Toxicologist 42(Suppl. 1), 102103 (Abstract).
Cochran, W. (1954). Some methods for strengthening the common 2 tests. Biometrics 10, 417451.[ISI]
Cripps, A. W., and Williams, V. J. (1975). The effect of pregnancy and lactation on food intake, gastrointestinal anatomy and the absorptive capacity of the small intestine in the albino rat. Br. J. Nutr. 33, 1732.[ISI][Medline]
Diel, P., Laudenbach, U., Smolnikar, K., Schulz, T., and Michna, H. (2001a). Bisphenol A: Morphological and molecular uterine and mammary gland reactions in different strains of the rat (Wistar, Sprague-Dawley, Da/Han). Toxicologist 60(1), 296 (Abstract).
Diel, P., Schmidt, S., Vollmer, G., and Michna, H. (2001b). Comparison of the hormonal susceptibility of different rat strains to bisphenol A treatment. Reprod. Toxicol. 15(5), 590 (Proceedings Abstract).
Dodds, E. C., and Lawson, W. (1936). Synthetic oestrogenic agents without the phenanthrene nucleus. Nature 137, 996.
Dunnett, C. W. (1955). A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 50, 10961121.[ISI]
Dunnett, C. W. (1964). New tables for multiple comparisons with a control. Biometrics 20, 482491.[ISI]
Elswick, B. A., Janszen, D. B., Gould, J. C., Stedman, D. B., and Welsch, F. (2000). Effects of perinatal exposure to low doses of bisphenol A in male offspring of Sprague-Dawley rats. Toxicologist 54(1), 256 (Abstract).
Ema, M., Fujii, S., Furukawa, M., Kiguchi, M., Ikka, T., and Harazono, A. (2001). Rat two-generation reproductive toxicity study of bisphenol A. Reprod. Toxicol. 15, 505523.[ISI][Medline]
Fialkowski, D., and Chahoud, I. (2000). The effects of low and high dose in utero exposure to bisphenol A on rat male offspring. Teratology 61(6), 484 (Abstract).
Gaido, K. W., Leonard, L. S., Lovell, S., Gould, J. C., Babai, D., Portier, C. J., and McDonnell, D. P. (1997). Evaluation of chemicals with endocrine modulating activity in a yeast-based steroid hormone receptor gene transcription assay. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 143, 205212.[ISI][Medline]
Gallavan, R. H., Jr., Holson, J. F., Stump, D. G., Knapp, J. F., and Reynolds, V. L. (1999). Interpreting the toxicologic significance of alterations in anogenital distance: Potential for confounding effects of progeny body weights. Reprod. Toxicol. 13, 383390.[ISI][Medline]
Goloubkova, T., Ribeiro, M. F., Rodrigues, L. P., Cecconello, A. L., and Spritzer, P. M. (2000). Effects of xenoestrogen bisphenol A on uterine and pituitary weight, serum prolactin levels and immunoreactive prolactin cells in ovariectomized Wistar rats. Arch. Toxicol. 74, 9298.[ISI][Medline]
Gould, J. C., Liaw, J. J., Elswick, B., Stedman, D., Turner, M., and Welsch, F. (1998). Maternal effects and secretion into milk of low doses of Bisphenol A given to rats via drinking water. Toxicologist 42(Suppl. 1), 175 (Abstract).
Gray, L. E., Jr., and Ostby, J. (1998). Effects of pesticides and toxic substances on behavioral and morphological reproductive development: Endocrine versus nonendocrine mechanisms. Toxicol. Ind. Health 14, 159184.[ISI][Medline]
Gray, L. E., Jr., Ostby, J., Wolf, C., Lambright, C., and Kelce, W. (1998). Annual review. The value of mechanistic studies in laboratory animals for the production of reproductive effects in wildlife: Endocrine effects on mammalian sexual differentiation. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 17(1), 109118.[ISI]
Hanley, T. R., Jr., and Watanabe, P. G. (1985). Measurement of solid feed consumption patterns in neonatal rats by 141Ce-radiolabeled microspheres. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 77, 496500.[ISI][Medline]
Jekat, F. W., Twomey, K., Butala, J. H., Cagen, S. Z., Dimond, S. S., Joiner, R. L., Shiotsuka, R. N., Stropp, G., Veenstra, G. E., and Waechter, J. M. (2000). Evaluation of oestrogenic potential of bisphenol A in the uterotrophic assay by oral and parenteral route at extended dose ranges. Toxicologist 54(1), 261 (Abstract).
Jonckheere, A. R. (1954). A distribution-free k-sample test against ordered alternatives. Biometrika 41, 133145.[ISI]
Kennedy, G. C., and Mitra, J. (1963). Body weight and food intake as initiating factors for puberty in the rat. Physiology 166, 408418.
Kim, H. S., Han, S. Y., Yoo, S. D., Lee, B. M., and Park, K. L. (2001). Potential estrogenic effects of bisphenol-A estimated by in vitro and in vivo combination assays. J. Toxicol. Sci. 26, 111118.[Medline]
Krishnan, A. V., Stathis, P., Permuth, S. F., Tokes, L., and Feldman, D. (1993). Bisphenol A: An estrogenic substance is released from polycarbonate flasks during autoclaving. Endocrinology 132, 22792286.[Abstract]
Kubo, K., Arai, O., Ogata, R., Omura, M., Hori, T., and Aou, S. (2001). Exposure to bisphenol A during the fetal and suckling periods disrupts sexual differentiation of the locus coeruleus and of behavior in the rat. Neurosci. Lett. 304, 7376.[ISI][Medline]
Kuiper, G. G. J., Carlsson, B., Grandien, K., Enmark, E., Haggblad, J., Nilsson, S., and Gustafsson, J. A. (1997). Comparison of the ligand binding specificity and transcript tissue distribution of estrogen receptors and ß. Endocrinology 138, 863870.
Kuiper, G. G. J., Lemmen, G., Carlsson, B., Corton, J. C., Safe, S. H., van der Saag, P. T., van der Burg, B., and Gustafsson, J. A. (1998). Interaction of estrogenic chemicals and phytoestrogens with estrogen receptor beta. Endocrinology 139, 42524263.
Kwon, S., Stedman, D. B., Elswick, B. A., Cattley, R. C., and Welsch, F. (2000). Pubertal development and reproductive functions of Crl:CD BR Sprague-Dawley rats exposed to bisphenol A during prenatal and postnatal development. Toxicol. Sci. 55, 399406.
Laudenbach, U., Diel, P., Smolnikar, K., Schult, T., and Michna, H. (2001). Bisphenol A does not mimic (anti-) androgen-like activities in orchiectomized Wistar rats. Toxicologist 60(1), 297 (Abstract).
Laws, S. C., Carey, S. A., Ferrell, J. M., Bodman, G. J., and Cooper, R. L. (2000). Estrogenic activity of octylphenol, nonylphenol, bisphenol A, and methoxychlor in rats. Toxicol. Sci. 54, 154167.
Liaw, J. J., Gould, J. C., Welsch, F., and Sar, M. (1997). Gestation and early lactational influence of bisphenol A on the differentiation of the sexually dimorphic nucleus of the preoptic area (SDN-POA) in rat brains. Toxicologist 36(1, Part 2), 14 (Abstract).
Liaw, J. J., Stedman, D., Gould, J. C., Elswick, B., and Welsch, F. (1998). Reproductive development of female rats prenatally and lactationally exposed to bisphenol A. Toxicologist 42(Suppl. 1), 176 (Abstract).
Long, X., Burke, K. A., Bigsby, R. M., and Nephew, K. P. (2001). Effects of the xenoestrogen bisphenol A on expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the rat. Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood) 226, 477483.
Maruyama, S., Fujimoto, N., Yin, H., and Ito, A. (1999). Growth stimulation of a rat pituitary cell line MtT/E-2 by environmental estrogens in vitro and in vivo. Endocr. J. 46, 513520.[ISI][Medline]
Matthews, J. B., Twomey, K., and Zacharewski, T. R. (2001). In vitro and in vivo interactions of bisphenol A and its metabolite, bisphenol A glucuronide, with estrogen receptors and ß. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 14, 149157.[ISI][Medline]
McIntyre, B. S., Barlow, N. J., and Foster, P. M. D. (2001). Androgen-mediated development in male rat offspring exposed to flutamide in utero: Permanence and correlation of early postnatal changes in anogenital distance and nipple retention with malformations in androgen-dependent tissues. Toxicol. Sci. 62, 236249.
Milligan, S. R., Balasubramanian, A. V., and Kalita, J. C. (1998). Relative potency of xenobiotic estrogens in an acute in vivo mammalian assay. Environ. Health Perspect. 106, 2326.[ISI][Medline]
Morrissey, R. E., George, J. D., Price, C. J., Tyl, R. W., Marr, M. C., and Kimmel, C. A. (1987). The developmental toxicity of bisphenol A in rats and mice. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 8, 571582.[ISI][Medline]
Morrissey, R. E., Lamb, J. C., 4th, Morris, R. W., Chapin, R. E., Gulati, D. K., and Heindel, J. J. (1989). Results and evaluations of 48 continuous breeding reproduction studies conducted in mice. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 13, 747777.[ISI][Medline]
Nagao, T., Saito, Y., Usumi, K., Kuwagata, M., and Imai, K. (1999). Reproductive function in rats exposed neonatally to bisphenol A and estradiol benzoate. Reprod. Toxicol. 13, 303311.[ISI][Medline]
Nagel, S. C., vom Saal, F. S., Thayer, K. A., Dhar, M. G., Boechler, M., and Welshons, W. V. (1997). Relative binding affinity-serum modified access (RBA-SMA) assay predicts the relative in vivo bioactivity of the xenoestrogens bisphenol A and octylphenol. Environ. Health Perspect. 105, 7076.[ISI][Medline]
NRC (1996). Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, National Institutes of Health.
NTP (2001). National Toxicology Program Endocrine Disrupters Low-Dose Peer Review. Available at http://ntp-server.niehs.nih.gov/htdocs/liason/LowDosePeerFinalRpt.pdf. Accessed April 23 2002.
Pottenger, L. H., Domoradzki, J. Y., Markham, D. A., Hansen, S. C., Cagen, S. Z., and Waechter, J. M. Jr. (2000). The relative bioavailability and metabolism of bisphenol A in rats is dependent upon the route of administration. Toxicol. Sci. 54, 318.
Quigley, C. A., De Bellis, A., Marschke, K. B., el-Awady, M. K., Wilson, E. M., and French, F. S. (1995). Androgen receptor defects: historical, clinical, and molecular perspectives. Endocr. Rev. 16, 271321.[ISI][Medline]
Ramos, J., Varayoud, J., Sonnenschein, C., Soto, A.M., Munoz de Toro, M., and Luque, E. H. (2001). Prenatal exposure to low doses of bisphenol A alters the periductal stroma and glandular cell function in the rat ventral prostate. Biol. Reprod. 65, 12711277.
Robb, G. W., Amann, R. P., and Killian, G. H. (1978). Daily sperm production and epididymal sperm reserves of pubertal and adult rats. J. Reprod. Fertil. 54, 103107.[Abstract]
Rubin, B. S., Murray, M. K., Damassa, D. A., King, J. C., and Soto, A. M. (2001). Perinatal exposure to low doses of bisphenol A affects body weight, patterns of estrous cyclicity, and plasma LH levels. Environ. Health Perspect. 109, 675680.[ISI][Medline]
SAS Institute. (1989a). SAS Language and Procedures: Usage, Version 6, 1st ed. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
SAS Institute. (1989b). SAS/STAT Users' Guide, Version 6, 4th ed., Volumes 1 and 2, SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
SAS Institute. (1990a). SAS Language: Reference, Version 6, 1st ed., SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
SAS Institute (1990b). SAS Language: Procedures Guide, Version 6, 3rd ed., SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
SAS Institute (1990c). SAS Companion for the VMSTM Environment, Version 6, 1st ed., SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
SAS Institute (1996). SAS Companion for the Microsoft Windows Environment, SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
SAS Institute (1997). SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements Through Release 6.12, SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
Schönfelder, G., Flick, B., Mayr, L. Talsness, C., Paul, M., and Chahoud, I. (2001). Molecular aspects of low and high dose Bisphenol A prenatal exposure. Reprod. Toxicol. 15, 594.
Shah, B. V., Barnwell, B. G., and Bieler, G. S. (1997). SUDAAN® Software for the Statistical Analysis of Correlated Data. User's Manual, Release 7.5, Volume 1, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Sharpe, R. M., Fisher, J. S., Millar, M. M., Jobling, S., and Sumpter, J. P. (1995). Gestational and lactational exposure of rats to xenoestrogens results in reduced testicular size and sperm production. Environ. Health Perspect. 103, 11361143.[ISI][Medline]
Sharpe, R. M., Turner, K. J., and Sumpter, J. P. (1998). Endocrine disrupters and testis development. Environ. Health Perspect. 106, A220A221.
Shirley, B. (1984). The food intake of rats during pregnancy and lactation. Lab. Anim. Sci. 34, 169172.[Medline]
Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Snedecor, G. W., and Cochran, W. G. (1967). Statistical Methods, 6th ed., Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.
Snyder, R. W., Maness, S. C., Gaido, K. W., Welsch, F., Sumner, S. C. J., and Fennell, T. R. (2000). Metabolism and disposition of bisphenol A in female rats. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 168, 225234.[ISI][Medline]
Steinmetz, R. N., Brown, N.G., Allen, D. L., Bigsby, R. M., and Ben-Jonathan, N. (1997). The environmental estrogen bisphenol A stimulates prolactin release in vitro and in vivo. Endocrinology 138, 17801786.
Stoker, T. E., Robinette, C. L., Britt, B. H., Laws, S. C., and Cooper, R. L. (1999). Prepubertal exposure to compounds that increase prolactin secretion in the male rat: Effects on the adult prostate. Biol. Reprod. 61, 16361643.
Takahashi, O., and Oishi, S. (2000). Disposition of orally administered 2,2-Bis (4-hydroxyphenylpropane (Bisphenol A) in pregnant rats and the placental transfer to fetuses. Environ. Health Perspect. 108, 931935.[ISI][Medline]
Takahashi, O., and Oishi, S. (2001). Testicular toxicity of dietary 2,2-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl) propane (bisphenol A) in F344 rats. Arch. Toxicol.75, 4251.[ISI][Medline]
Talsness, C. E., and Chahoud, I. (2000). The effects of in utero exposure to a low dose of bisphenol A on female sexual maturation of the rat. Teratology 61(6), 445 (Abstract).
Tohei, A., Suda, S., Taya, K., Hashimoto, T., and Kogo, H. (2001). Bisphenol A inhibits testicular functions and increases luteinizing hormone secretion in adult male rats. Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood) 226, 216221.
U.S. EPA (1989). Toxic Substances Control Act, EPA (TSCA); Good Laboratory Practice Standards; Final Rule. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Federal Register 54(158), 3403434050.
U.S. EPA (1996). Part II, Environmental Protection Agency: Reproductive Toxicity Risk Assessment Guidelines; Notice. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Federal Register 61(212), 5627456322 (31 October 1996).
U.S. EPA (1998). Health Effects Test Guidelines, OPPTS 870.3800, Reproduction and Fertility Effects (Final Guideline, August 1998). Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances (OPPTS), Environmental Protection Agency.
vom Saal, F. S., Cooke, P. S., Buchanan, D. L., Palanza, P., Thayer, K. A., Nagel, S. C., Parmigiani, S., and Welshons, W. V. (1998). A physiologically based approach to the study of bisphenol A and other estrogenic chemicals on the size of the reproductive organs, daily sperm production, and behavior. Toxicol. Ind. Health 14, 239260.[ISI][Medline]
Wazeter, F. X., and Goldenthal, E. I. (1984a). Report on reproduction and ninety day oral toxicity study in rats. Report by the International Research and Development Corporation, Mattawan, MI (IRDC Report No. 313-078) for the General Electric Company. EPA/OTS; Doc. No. 40-8486013.
Wazeter, F. X., and Goldenthal, E. I. (1984b). Report on reproduction and ninety day feeding study in rats. Report by the International Research and Development Corporation, Mattawan, MI (IRDC Report No. 313-112) for the General Electric Company. EPA/OTS; Doc. No. 40-8486013.
Welsch, F., Elswick, B. A., Janszen, D. B., and Robinette, C. L. (2001). Lack of effects of perinatal exposure to low doses of bisphenol A on male rat offspring ventral prostate gland. Reproductive Toxicol. 15(5), 597598 (Proceedings Abstract).
Welsch, F., Elswick, B. A., and Stedman, D. B. (2000). Effects of perinatal exposure to low doses of bisphenol A on female offspring of Sprague-Dawley rats. Toxicologist 54(1), 256 (Abstract No. 1204).
Williams, K., McKinnell, C., Saunders, P. T. K., Walker, M., Fisher, J. S., Turner, K. J., Atanassova, N., and Sharpe, M. (2001). Neonatal exposure to potent and environmental oestrogens and abnormalities of the male reproductive system in the rat: Evidence for importance of the androgen-oestrogen balance and assessment of the relevance to man. Hum. Reprod. Update 7, 236247.
Winer, B. J. (1962). Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Wu, X. and Chahoud, I. (2000). The effects of low and high dose prenatal exposure on female rat offspring. Toxicologist 54(1), 255 (Abstract No. 1200).
Yamasaki, K., Sawaki, M., and Takatsuki, M. (2000). Immature rat uterotrophic assay of bisphenol A. Environ. Health Perspect. 108, 11471150.[ISI][Medline]