St Thomas' Hospital, Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology Unit, London, UK
![]() |
Abstract |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Methods. Intra-pair differences between the reported birth weight of the twins (n=4008) were examined for an association with: (i) intra-pair differences in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) at the lumbar spine, hip and forearm using linear regression; and (ii) osteoarthritis status in pairs discordant for radiographic disease at the hand, hip and knee using matched logistic regression. The confounding influences of height and weight were taken into account.
Results. The mean age of the twins was 47.5±12.3 yr. Intra-pair differences in birth weight were significantly associated with BMD at the spine (P=0.047), total hip (P=0.016) and femoral neck (P<0.001), but not at the forearm (P=0.245). These were entirely explained by the birth weight association with height and weight. The associations of intra-pair differences in birth weight and BMC were highly significant (P<0.001) at all sites, but were partly explained by adjustment for adult height and weight. We found no clear association between intra-pair birth weight differences and OA in twins discordant for any of the radiographic OA phenotypes at any site.
Conclusions. Bone mass and especially BMC are highly associated with birth weight. These associations are accounted for mainly by environmental factors that are independent of maternal factors such as gestational age, maternal smoking and nutrition, and are largely mediated by skeletal size and particularly adult height. Birth weight does not appear to be a major influence on the later development of radiographic OA in women.
KEY WORDS: Birth weight, Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis, Twin study.
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
With regard to the musculoskeletal system it has been suggested that skeletal growth and adult body composition, particularly bone and mass, might be programmed during fetal life [5]. Studies to date have examined the association of birth weight and weight in infancy with adult body composition and they have been interpreted as showing a potential fetal programming of osteoporosis risk. However, these studies were based on small numbers with inconsistent results and were prone to potential selection bias as only a small percentage of the original birth cohort participated in the study [25]. If birth weight does indeed have an effect on body composition, it is possible to speculate that an effect may also be seen for osteoarthritis. However, this has not been examined.
Studies showing birth weight influences on adult phenotypes are controversial because of their susceptibility to bias. Environmental or maternal factors represent one of the main confounders of the fetal origin hypothesis, as it is based on the assumption of intrauterine programming due to nutritional constriction at critical periods of fetal development. A purely genetic explanation of the association between birth weight and later phenotypes remains possible.
Twin studies present a unique experimental setting in which the fetal programming hypothesis can be examined [8, 9]. The St Thomas' twin unit has been gathering data on twins since 1993 related to a range of diseases of ageing. We explored the association of birth weight with osteoporosis (OP) and osteoarthritis (OA) in a large national cohort of female twins, using intra-pair differences in birth weight and subsequent adult phenotypes. This study design controls for maternal behavioural and sociodemographic characteristics known to influence birth weight. Potential confounding due to genetic factors is greatly reduced, and among monozygotic twins, eliminated.
![]() |
Participants and methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Bone measurements
Bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) were measured at the lumbar spine (L1L4) in the anteroposterior (AP) projection, the non-dominant hip (femoral neck, total hip) and the non-dominant forearm, using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (Hologic QDR-2000 DXA scannerHologic, Inc. Waltham, MA, USA). Reproducibility has been assessed by performing duplicate scans of 40 normal volunteers and was between 0.6 and 1.6% depending on the site scanned.
Osteoarthritis measurements
The radiographic features of osteoarthritis (ROA), such as the presence of osteophytes and narrowing of the joint space were examined at three sites.
Hand. Plain posteroanterior (PA) hand radiographs with the hands placed flat, at a tubefilm distance of 100 cm were obtained. Fifteen joints were assessed in each hand: five distal interphalangeal joints, four proximal interphalangeal, the first carpometacarpal joint and five metacarpophalangeal joints.
Knee. Anteroposterior weight-bearing and skyline views were obtained at a tubefilm distance of 100 cm. Osteophytes and joint space narrowing graded from 0 to 3 were read in the tibiofemoral lateral and medial and patellofemoral compartments.
The summary grade for each joint of the hand and each knee was based on the Kellgren and Lawrence (K&L) grading system (04). An individual was considered to have radiographic OA of the hands if at least grade 2 K&L was present in two or more hand joints and ROA of the knee if at least grade 2 K&L was present in either or both knees.
Osteophytes and joint space narrowing were separately evaluated and graded from 0 to 3 for increasing severity with 1+ being considered positive.
Hip. Pelvic radiographs were obtained in supine AP position with a standard tubefilm distance of 100 cm and the feet positioned in 15° of internal rotation. We used the Croft grading system (05), a modification of the K&L scale specifically developed for hip OA. Cases were defined by a minimum grade of 1 with definite osteophytes [13].
A single observer, who was blind to the zygosity and pairings, assessed the radiographs for each site. If an abnormality was seen, the radiographs were read independently by a second observer, and if there was a discrepancy, the opinion of a third specialist was asked.
Reproducibility. The intra-observer reproducibility for each site was estimated using a weighted kappa statistic and found to be satisfactory ranging from 0.69 to 0.93 for different radiological sites and features.
Confounding variables
Height and weight were considered as potential confounding variables as it is known that birth weight is positively related to adult body size [14] and also has been related to OA and BMD. The effect of other known lifestyle determinants of bone loss including lifetime alcohol consumption (cut-off of 15 units/week), ever smoking, drug use such as steroids and history of heavy physical activity reported during the last 12 months [15] were also considered in the analysis.
Statistical methods
Intra-pair differences in self-reported birth weight were regressed upon intra-pair differences in bone measurements using linear regression for all twins and subsequently stratified by zygosity. Adjustment was made for potential confounding variables, also calculated as intra-pair differences. Significant differences were defined as a P value of less than 0.05 using two-tailed tests.
For radiographic features of osteoarthritis, conditional logistic regression analysis for matched casecontrol groups was used to investigate the relationship with birth weight.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
Low birth weight (LBW) <2 kg was reported in 26%. These LBW twins had significantly lower BMD at the hip (P<0.01) and forearm (P<0.05) compared with the heavier twins (birth weight >2 kg). The difference did not reach significant levels at the spine (P=0.0947).
Bone mineral density (BMD). Intra-pair differences in birth weight were significantly associated with intra-pair differences in BMD at the spine (P=0.047), total hip (P=0.016) and femoral neck (P<0.001), but not the forearm.
When MZ twins (n=445) were examined separately, higher regression coefficients were found at all studied sites (spine P<0.001, total hip P=0.009, femoral neck P<0.001, forearm P<0.001), whereas in DZ twins (n=966) the intra-pair differences in birth weight were significantly associated with the intra-pair differences in BMD only at the femoral neck (P<0.001).
However, none of the above associations remained significant after adjustment for intra-pair differences in height and weight (Table 2).
|
When MZ and DZ twins were examined separately, the non-adjusted associations of intra-pair differences in birth weight with intra-pair differences in BMC were highly significant in both groups and at all sites.
Adjustment for intra-pair differences in weight and height removed the significance of the associations in DZs and the group as a whole. Interestingly, the associations remained significant after adjustment for intra-pair differences in height and weight only in MZ twins (spine P=0.026, femoral neck P=0.041, forearm P=0.035) (Table 3).
|
Birth weight and radiographic osteoarthritis
There were no statistically significant intra-pair differences in birth weight in twins who were discordant for any of the radiographic OA phenotypes examined. These were: overall OA, presence of osteophytes, joint space narrowing at the hands, knees and hips. Similarly, no association was found when MZ and DZ twins were examined separately for all analyses (Table 4).
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The majority of epidemiological studies on fetal programming, including twin studies, have examined birth weight in relation to subsequent development of cardiovascular disease, hypertension and non-insulin-dependent diabetes [16, 17]. Although rickets has served as a paradigm of how undernutrition at a critical stage of early life can lead to persisting structural changes [7], there is a scarcity of studies in the literature exploring the fetal programming of musculoskeletal diseases. This is partly due to practical difficulties of such a study; for instance, seeking out birth records of half a century ago has the inevitable problems of incomplete samples, missing records and follow-up, which can all lead to selection bias and small sample sizes.
Cooper et al. [2, 3] have suggested that the trajectory of bone growth might be programmed during fetal and early post-natal life. They have shown weak associations of infant weight with adult bone mineral content that disappeared after correction for bone area, specifically adult height. More recently the same group suggested birth weight to be a predictor of both BMC and BMD even after adjustment for adult height. However, confidence intervals for their estimates were wide, especially for females, as the study was based on data from only 41 women [5].
Our findings were based on a large number of twin pairs, exploiting the advantages of a twin study design and overcoming many of the practical problems of cohort studies. Fetal programming has been considered to be the result of undernutrition and other adverse influences during critical periods of development, many of them attributed to maternal factors [18]. Furthermore, epidemiological studies have shown maternal characteristics such as maternal birth weight [19], gestational and maternal age, height and body composition, maternal smoking, drug use, nutrition and social class also to be determinants of birth weight [20]. Hence, parental and especially maternal factors play a potentially crucial role on the observed associations of low birth weight with adult disease phenotypes. By investigating intra-pair differences in twins, parental confounding factors, as well as unknown environmental and genetic factors, were controlled for and the significant associations we found were independent of these factors.
Epidemiological studies both in twins [21, 22] and unrelated individuals [23, 24] have shown a consistent association between birth weight and adult skeleton size, particularly height. This is in accordance with our finding of more pronounced associations with BMC, which is the most size-dependent measurement. Furthermore, adjustment for adult weight and height attenuated, and in most instances removed, the effect of birth weight on bone measurements. This indicates the associations were largely mediated by adult skeleton size. Notably, height accounted for most of the association of birth weight with BMC.
The finding of stronger associations in MZ twins, who are entirely matched for genetic factors, is of interest. Poulsen et al. [25] reached similar findings when studying the metabolic syndrome in twins. Both observations point to an intrauterine environmental interpretation of the associations. In our twin cohort, MZ twins had greater intra-pair variability in birth weight than DZ. This is a well established observation and has been attributed to the unequal competition for nutrients or placental blood supply between monochorionic MZs (sharing a placenta) [26, 27]. In spite of substantial intra-pair birth weight differences and differences in prenatal environment of monochorionic and dichorionic MZ twins, a recent study of the East Flanders Twin Survey [28] using data on placentation found no difference in intra-pair concordance of adult anthropometry.
Our interest in testing the role of fetal programming in osteoarthritis arose from the following evidence: obesity and osteoarthritis have been consistently linked [29]; skeletal growth and developmental abnormalities have been shown to predispose to premature hip OA [30]; and the presence and severity of osteophytes are strongly related with higher bone mass [13]. There are also potential biological mediators of the examined association. Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 plays a major role in prenatal development [31] and has been suggested as a candidate endocrine system of fetal programming [32]. In addition, synthesis of cartilage components appears to be dependent on a number of growth factors and disruption of the IGF axis might influence disease progression in OA [33, 34]. In contrast to OP phenotypes, we found no intra-pair differences in birth weights in twins discordant for radiographic OA phenotypes.
We had 99.9% power to rule out a 10% difference in birth weight (235 g) between the discordant for ROA twins. Thus our study excludes any major role of birth weight on developing radiographic OA in women, although a minor association or an effect in men is still possible.
Several potential limitations need to be addressed in our study. Birth weights were self-reported and the validity of recall data has been questioned. However, studies that addressed the problem have found that the validity of the method is acceptable in population settings [35, 36]. In the same cohort of twins, our group confirmed other observations of a birth effect on adult hypertension independent of maternal factors [12]. Moreover, our twin cohort had similar recalled birth weights to other British twin cohorts of the same age range [37]. Another potential concern is representativeness. Although twins have been thought to be ideal for studying fetal programming [38], it has been argued that low birth weight in twins does not have the same implication as low birth weight in singletons [37, 39]. However, as our results mirror earlier results in singletons [5] and mean levels and variance of bone and joint parameters are similar to singletons [11], this is unlikely to be a major concern.
In conclusion, we have shown a clear association between birth weight and bone mass mediated through skeletal size, confirming the importance of fetal programming in skeletal development. The study suggests maternal factors are not responsible, implying that fetal nutrition and placental factors play a key role in the development of the skeleton.
![]() |
Notes |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|