University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Correspondence to: J. Mikdashi, Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, 10 South Pine Street, Suite 834, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. E-mail: jmikdash{at}umaryland.edu.
![]() |
Abstract |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Methods. One hundred and thirty patients with SLE were followed at the University of Maryland Lupus Clinic from 1992 until 2003. NP manifestations were defined according to the revised American College of Rheumatology (ACR) nomenclature and case definitions for NPSLE syndromes. Disease activity was measured using the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), organ damage using the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Damage Index SLICC/ACR (SDI); NP damage (NPDI) was measured with the corresponding domain of the SDI. At end of study period, 64 patients exhibited no NP damage (NPDI = 0) and 66 patients developed significant NP damage (defined as NPDI 1). The baseline features for these two patient groups were compared, and variables found to be significantly different were examined by multivariable analyses to determine their contribution to NP damage.
Results. Significant NP damage is common in SLE; mortality is infrequent and the cause of death is unrelated to NP damage. Independent predictors of significant NP damage were disease activity, Caucasian ethnicity and the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies and anti-Ro/SSA antibody. Certain clinical features at baseline predicted specific NP damage. For example, higher disease activity at baseline was predictive of psychosis and cognitive impairment, anti-dsDNA was predictive of polyneuropathy, and antiphospholipid antibodies were predictive of seizures and cerebrovascular accidents.
Conclusions. In this longitudinal SLE cohort, significant cumulative NP damage occurred. Early aggressive therapy targeted towards NP manifestations may prevent the occurrence of NP damage.
KEY WORDS: Systemic lupus erythematosus, Neuropsychiatric damage, Risk factors
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In the multiethnic Lupus in Minorities; Nature vs Nurture (LUMINA) cohort [5] and similarly in the Hopkins Lupus cohort [4], NP manifestations accounted for the greatest proportion of organ system damage. Older age at SLE onset, higher dose of corticosteroid used, disease activity as measured by the Systemic Lupus Activity Measurement (SLAM), as well as psychological and sociodemographic features, contributed independently to overall damage measured by the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SLICC/ACR-DI) or SDI [15]. Rivest et al. [6], found that damage to most systems, NP included, was associated with older age at diagnosis of SLE and disease duration, and not ethnicity or socioeconomic status.
The predictors of NP damage have been difficult to ascertain. The heterogeneity of NP manifestations preceding NP damage, the problems with adequate classification of these NP manifestations, and the different types of NP damage (which may have different predictors) probably explain the paucity of literature on this subject. Furthermore, the NP manifestations previously recognized among the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for the classifications of patients with SLE [16, 17] include only seizure and psychosis and not others that may be followed by NP damage. Using the revised ACR nomenclature and case definitions of NPSLE [18] as well as the individual items of the NP domains of the SDI as endpoints, we have now reassessed the risk factors associated with significant NP damage in a contemporary SLE cohort. Of note, NP damage has been considered a predictor of mortality and serious morbidity in SLE [1922], so understanding the factors underlying NP damage appears to be quite relevant. Thus, we have also assessed mortality and its relationship with NP damage in our cohort. These data are now presented.
![]() |
Patients and methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Disease onset was defined as the time at which a patient met four ACR criteria for the classification of SLE; patients were then enrolled into the study. SLE patients with NP manifestations prior to enrolment were excluded from the analyses. NP manifestations were clinically ascertained and classified into distinct syndromes as per the ACR nomenclature. Cognitive function was assessed, if indicated, using the ACR-recommended battery for neuropsychological testing plus the Mini-Mental State Examination [23]. Disease activity was measured with the SLE activity index or SLEDAI [24]. Imaging studies were performed if clinically indicated.
Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) were measured with an immunofluorescent test using rat liver as the substrate and following the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations [25]. Anti-dsDNA antibodies were examined with the Crithidia luciliae assay [26]; anti-Ro/SSA and anti-La/SSB antibodies were tested using the traditional Ouchterlony double immunodiffusion method [27]. Anti-Smith (Sm) and anti-RNP antibodies were detected using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and if these antibodies fluctuated over time on repeated testing an immunoprecipitation test was done to confirm these antibodies [28]. The lupus anticoagulant (LAC) was ascertained using the guidelines established by the 1991 Scientific Subcommittee criteria, later simplified by Exner [29]; anti-IgM and IgG anticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies were measured using a commercial ELISA [30]. Anti-ribosomal P antibodies were determined in selected patients using a commercial ELISA method.
SDI and definition of damage (overall and NP)
The SDI measures cumulative damage accrued since disease onset. The SDI includes 41 non-reversible items encompassing nine organ systems: diabetes, malignancies and infertility are the three additional domains of SDI. Each item must be present for at least 6 months to be scored. For a repeated event to be scored (e.g. a new stroke) it has to occur at least 6 months apart from the first; the same item cannot be scored twice. The SDI was scored according to the definitions outlined in the corresponding glossary and it was obtained in all patients 6 months after disease onset and biannually thereafter. Patients with an SDI score 1 are said to have accrued overall damage.
The NP damage index (NPDI) was ascertained 6 months after the occurrence of an acute NP event (Appendix 1, available as supplementary data at Rheumatology Online). An NPDI score 1 was felt to be clinically significant; thus an increment of
1 was considered as NP damage worsening.
Mortality and causes of death
The causes of death in this SLE cohort were categorized as follows in accordance with previously published work [31]: (i) SLE-related causes, including active disease [particularly nephritis, vasculitis leading to NPSLE syndromes, and end-organ failure (renal, cardiac or pulmonary)], infections, and others (particularly vascular events); (ii) unrelated to SLE (particularly malignancies, suicide); and (iii) unknown.
Statistical methods
First, the baseline features of those patients accruing and those not accruing any NP damage were examined. Comparisons were done using the 2 test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for categorical and continuous variables respectively. Subsequently, patients were divided into three groups as follows: (i) no NP damage, NPDI = 0; (ii) mild damage, NPDI = 1 or 2; and (iii) severe damage, NPDI
3. Baseline features were compared among these three groups. Given that damage tends to accrue over time, disease duration was included in these analyses as a covariate.
Demographic features, such as ethnicity, gender, age at onset, socioeconomic status, including the type of health-care delivery system that is available, clinical manifestations frequently occurring in SLE, including arthritis, skin rashes, fever, pleurisy, pericarditis, nephritis (defined as mesangial, focal proliferative, diffuse proliferative or membranous glomerulonephritis according to the WHO classification on histopathology, or persistent proteinuria of >0.5 g/day, or proteinuria of >3.5 g/day, or cellular casts of any kind according to the ACR criteria), alopecia, vasculitis, Raynaud's phenomenon, adenopathy, splenomegaly, myositis, myocarditis, anaemia, leucopenia, thrombocytopenia and immunological abnormalities, including anti-dsDNA, antiphospholipid, anti-Ro/SSA, anti-La/SSB and anti-Smith antibodies, as well as disease activity, were examined in relation to NP manifestations according to the ACR nomenclature. The possible relationship between NP damage and mortality was also examined.
Multivariable analyses were performed using logistic regression with NP damage as the dependent variable in one of them. In other regression analyses, the dependent variable was mild or severe damage. Finally, an attempt was made to examine the variables associated with the occurrence of specific NPDI items. In a separate regression, the factors associated with mortality were examined. In all regressions, P<0.05 was considered significant.
All analyses were done with SPSS for Windows, version 11.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).
Informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to enrolment into the study. This clinical research followed the code of ethics approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Maryland.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Seven years from enrolment into the cohort, on the average, nearly half the patients have yet to accrue any damage, NP included. Some SLE manifestations, particularly headaches related to SLE, have been common but they have not been followed by NP damage. Nonetheless, individual NP damage items accrued with variable frequency, cognitive impairment being the most common (27.3%); other NP damage items were as follows: CVA, 25.7%; polyneuropathy, 18.2%; psychosis, 15.1%; seizures, 7.6%; and transverse myelitis, 6.1%. Some patients have accrued more than one NP damage item.
Neuropsychiatric damage
Baseline demographic and clinical features of patients with and without NP damage are shown in Table 1. The two patient groups had comparable disease durations and numbers of ACR criteria for the classification of SLE. Likewise, other socioeconomic features, including education, health insurance and access to health-care, were comparable between the two groups (data not shown).
|
Severity of NP damage
Baseline demographic and clinical manifestations as a function of the severity of NP damage are presented in Table 2. Features associated with more severe damage included disease duration, non-AfricanAmerican ethnicity, older age at diagnosis, male gender, disease activity, cutaneous vasculitis and the use of immunosuppressive therapy. The presences of anti-Ro/SSA and of the antiphospholipid antibodies, particularly LAC and IgG aCL, were also associated with severe NP damage.
|
Damage in the other domains of the SDI and NP damage
Although renal and pulmonary manifestations occurred with increased frequency in the NP damage group, the overall SDI or damage in these particular organs did not associate with NP damage accrual. Likewise, none of the other damage items associated with NP damage but osteoporosis, alopecia, cataracts and vascular damage were more frequent among patients in the NP damage group than in the group with no NP damage, but the differences were not statistically significant (data not shown).
Mortality and NP damage
At the time these analyses were conducted, eight deaths had occurred; all eight patients had developed NP damage, death occurring 5 yr after NP damage ensued. The cause of death in these patients was unrelated to NP damage and NP damage was not retained in a logistic regression model in which mortality was the dependent variable (data not shown).
Neuropsychiatric damage: multivariable analyses
NP damage
Variables independently associated with the occurrence of NP damage (any) were disease activity, non-AfricanAmerican ethnicity, age at disease onset and the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, particularly LAC and IgG aCL. After adjusting for age at onset in the multivariate analysis, the variables retained in the model were the same. These data are shown in Table 3.
|
Specific NP damage
The variables independently associated with specific NP damage items are shown in Table 4. Seizures were associated with CVA and the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, particularly LAC and IgG aCL. Polyneuropathy was associated with the presence of serum anti-dsDNA antibodies. Psychosis was associated with greater disease activity and the presence of the anti-dsDNA antibodies. CVA was associated with the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. Cognitive impairment was associated with greater disease activity and older age at SLE diagnosis.
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In this longitudinal cohort, significant NP damage was present in 51% of SLE patients with mean disease duration of 7 yr; the most frequent NP damage was cognitive impairment. The strongest risk factors for the development of significant NP damage was the presence of greater disease activity at the NPSLE event. Significant NP damage (any) was particularly noted among Caucasian patients, patients who were older at SLE onset, and having antiphospholipid antibodies, particularly LAC and IgG aCL. Severe NP damage was greater among male patients having vasculitis and anti-Ro/SSA antibodies.
Prior studies [19, 20, 32, 33] have shown that significant overall damage, NP included, is more common in patients with evidence of clinical activity, particularly vasculitis [33], diffuse glomerulonephritis [14] and multiple autoantibodies [34, 35], including anti-dsDNA, anti-Smith antibodies and antiphospholipid antibodies. Similarly, we showed that NP damage was associated with greater disease activity particularly NP manifestations, but also manifestations in other organ systems. Of importance in this regard, most patients with mild disease activity at time of NP events developed only mild NP damage. Furthermore, subsequent NP damage occurred more frequently in patients with greater or persistent disease activity.
The clinical relevance of autoantibodies in SLE is well recognized for the diagnosis, and in some cases, the prediction of disease activity [3640]; however, the relation with damage has not been established. In this cohort, anti-Ro/SSA was associated with severe NP damage, whereas no association with anti-La/SSB was noted. However, whether these antibodies are implicated in NP damage cannot be determined from the data obtained in this study. Nevertheless, knowing of this association may be important. Our study also supports the importance of antiphospholipid antibodies, particularly aCL antibodies and LAC, as independent risk factors associated with different NP manifestations, such as seizures, CVA and cognitive impairment, but also, more importantly, significant NP damage, as has been shown by others [4143]. The association of cognitive impairment with aCL antibodies and LAC at baseline was examined. Patients with persistent elevated aCL antibodies and LAC were found to have more thrombotic events with CVA, and this may contribute to cognitive decline.
Ethnic differences in survival have often been reported for SLE patients, with poorer long-term outcomes/damage noted among minority or underprivileged patient groups [5]. This is attributed primarily to differences in exposure to environmental or other socioeconomic factors rather than to differences in genetic predisposition [3, 4445]. In this cohort, NP damage accrued rapidly in all ethnic groups; however, a greater proportion of Caucasian patients exhibited more NP damage accrual. These findings may be attributed to the presence of advanced disease at the time of NP events or comorbid conditions. The lack of contribution of socioeconomic features to the occurrence of NP damage was evident in the regression analyses.
The influence of gender (similar to ethnicity) upon SLE is profound. Many differences have been described, including the greatly increased frequency of SLE in women, but also the differences in clinical features, serology and genetics. While there have been conflicting results in the literature, males have generally been reported to have more NP symptoms. Our study supports the overall conclusion that men are more likely to develop NP symptoms more rapidly, and consequently to have severe NP damage. It remains to be determined whether gender modifies NP severity among patients with a particular autoantibody specificity.
The limitations of our study deserve some discussion. First, the high prevalence of NP damage in our cohort has been observed in other studies [4, 5, 7], but may represent an overascertainment bias, given that our patients were specifically asked about their NP symptoms and were systematically ascertained for the presence of cognitive impairment. Secondly, the limited number of manifestations of active disease used in the analyses may have precluded the identification of an important clinical variable. Perhaps the addition of tests that assess functional damage, including electroencephalography, electromyography, evoked potential diagnostics, functional MR/glucose metabolism neuroimaging [14] or markers of neuronal damage [46], will complement clinical findings to define damage more accurately and at earlier stages. Thirdly, the SLICC/ACR SDI and the NPDI are valid and reliable standard assessments of damage, but they are not meant to distinguish the underlying cause of any of the damage items.
In summary, significant NP damage is common in SLE. Independent predictors of significant NP damage were disease activity, Caucasian ethnicity, older age at SLE onset, and the presence of anti-Ro/SSA and antiphospholipid antibodies, particularly LAC and IgG aCL. Controlling disease activity in this subset of SLE patients may improve long-term outcome and reduce NP damage. Further studies are needed, including randomized clinical trials to address whether the use of immunosuppressive therapy or thrombophylaxis will reduce NP damage.
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data are available
at Rheumatology Online.
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|