University Medical Center Utrecht 1 University Hospital Maastricht, 2 Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, 3 National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, 4 Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, 5 Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort and 6 Hilversum Hospital, Hilversum, The Netherlands.
Correspondence to: S. M. M. Verstappen, University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, F02.127, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mail: S.Verstappen{at}azu.nl
![]() |
Abstract |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Methods. A questionnaire on working status was filled out by 296 patients of working age. Employment and work disability rates adjusted for age and sex from the Dutch population were determined using indirect standardization. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to assess baseline predictors of work disability in a subgroup of patients (n = 195).
Results. After a mean disease duration of 4.3 yr, patients had a 0.78 (95% CI 0.670.88) chance of being employed and a 2.14 (95% CI 1.752.54) risk of being work disabled when compared with the Dutch population. Functional disability and job type at the start of the disease were predictors of future work disability. In total, 48 (37%) currently employed patients had changed their working conditions, of which reduced working hours (46%), reduced pacing of work (42%) and help from colleagues (49%) were the most important alterations. Of the 60 work disabled patients without a paid job, only 11 patients (18%) would be willing to work again.
Conclusion. This study shows that the adjusted employment rates were lower and that work disability rates were higher in patients with RA when compared with the general Dutch population. In addition, a substantial number of employed patients had to change their working conditions due to RA. Only a minority of work disabled RA patients was willing to return to the paid labour force.
KEY WORDS: Rheumatoid arthritis, Employment, Disability
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Several factors have been identified to be associated with or to be predictive of work disability, especially older age [7, 8], increased functional disability [4, 6, 7, 9, 10] and physically demanding jobs [5, 8, 11]. A clear insight into variables that can predict work disability, especially modifiable ones, is very important.
The aims of the present study were to estimate work disability and employment rates in Dutch patients with RA compared with the general population. In addition, we identified demographic, clinical, psychological and work-related variables associated with or predictive of work disability. Among patients who still had paid employment, specific working conditions were assessed; in addition willingness to return to paid work was explored in patients with RA-related work disability.
![]() |
Patients and methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Clinical assessments
At baseline and on predetermined assessment points the following variables were assessed: the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain (range 0100 mm where 100 is the most severe pain), VAS for general well-being (0100 mm where 100 is the worst general well-being), duration of morning stiffness (0720 min), Thompson joint score (a weighted score including both tender and swollen joint count; range 0534) [15, 16], erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (mm/1st h), serum rheumatoid factor (RF) (positive versus negative), functional disability (HAQ, Dutch version [17]), and radiological joint damage (modified Sharp/van der Heijde method [18]). The scales for mobility, self-care, pain, depressed mood, cheerful mood and anxiety were evaluated from the Dutch IRGL questionnaire (Impact of Rheumatic Diseases on General Health and Lifestyle [19]).
Questionnaire on working status
To adjust for possible seasonal influences, a random sample of half of the patients received a self-reporting questionnaire on demographic characteristics and working status in October 1999 and the other half in April 2000. Educational level was dichotomized (higher vocational or university education, i.e. more than 12 yr versus less than 12 yr of education). Jobs were dichotomized into manual jobs (agricultural workers, production workers, transport equipment operators and labourers, military personnel, nursing personnel, home help, warehouse employees) and non-manual jobs (professional and technical workers, administrative and managerial workers, clerical workers and sales and service workers).
Definition of working status
Present working status was classified as (i) having a paid job, (ii) being partially work disabled due to RA and working for pay, (iii) being work disabled and not working for pay, (iv) not working for pay or stopped working due to reasons unrelated to RA. In The Netherlands a person who is judged to be impaired by 80% or more is entitled to full work disability pension, while those who are impaired by 1580% are entitled to partial work disability.
Statistical analyses
Data on employment and work disability rates among patients with RA (2565 yr of age) were adjusted for age and sex from the general Dutch population (Dutch Bureau of Statistics, Voorburg, The Netherlands, 1999), using indirect standardization. Four age categories were considered for men, women and the total population, separately. For each of the distinguished categories the observed (O) and expected (E) number of patients with work disability and similarly for patients in the paid labour force were calculated. Expected levels of work disability and labour force participation were computed using reference data for the general Dutch population relating to age- and gender-specific levels for work disability and participation in the labour force. To calculate the adjusted work disability rate or employment rate of the patients, the O/E ratio is multiplied by the rate of the reference group, i.e. in this study the general population. The adjusted ratios can be interpreted as the relative chances of patients with RA of being work disabled or employed compared with the general population, adjusted for age and sex. A ratio of 1.0 indicates an equal chance, a rate ratio below 1.0 a decreased chance and a rate ratio above 1.0 an increased chance of work disability or labour force participation. To test for statistically significant differences between the RA patient group and the general population, we obtained the variances of the adjusted ratios, and the estimated 95% confidence interval (, i.e. corrected for the small sample size [20]). If 1.0 is included in the interval the estimate is statistically not significant at the alpha level of 0.05.
To compare characteristics of patients with a paid job and no work disability and patients with (partial) work disability at the time of filling out the questionnaire, values of clinical variables that were assessed at one of the predefined assessment points closest to the time the questionnaire was filled out, with a maximum of 6 months, were used for this analysis. The unpaired t-test or the MannWhitney U-test were used for continuous data, and the 2 test for categorical data, where appropriate. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. In addition, a multiple logistic regression was performed to estimate the probability of receiving work disability payments according to each variable, controlling for other variables.
KaplanMeier curves for patients with a paid job at the onset of disease were computed to assess time until (partial) work disability since disease onset. A Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to determine possible predictors at disease onset of work disability due to RA.
This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Review Committee and patients gave written consent.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Working status
For the total study population of 296 patients (216 females and 80 males), 107 (36%) patients [70 (32%) females and 37 (46%) males] had a paid job, 22 (7.4%) patients [12 (6%) females and 10 (13%) males] were (partially) work disabled due to RA and working for pay, 60 (20%) patients [44 (20%) females and 16 (20%) males] were work disabled and did not work for pay anymore and 107 (36%) patients [90 (42%) females and 17 (21%) males] had never had a paid job, or stopped working due to reasons unrelated to RA. Of work disabled patients due to RA, full work disability pension (for those with 80% impairment due to RA) was allocated to 60 patients (73%).
Table 1 shows the crude and adjusted data on employment and work disability among patients with RA and the general Dutch population. The adjusted employment rate for RA patients was 16% lower when compared with the employment rate of the general Dutch population. The adjusted work disability rate was 11% higher when compared with the work disability rate of the general population.
|
|
Predictors of work disability at diagnosis of disease
For patients with a paid job at disease onset and complete clinical baseline data (n = 195), baseline predictors of RA-related work disability were determined. The only statistically significant predictors of work disability were functional disability (HAQ) (ß = 0.79, S.E. = 0.17 and HR = 2.2; 95% CI 1.63.1) and job type (ß = 0.60, S.E. = 0.24 and HR = 1.8; 95% CI 1.12.9).
Difficulties in the present job
Of the 129 employed RA patients either with or without work disability, 48 (37%) patients reported that they had changed their working conditions. Reduced working hours (46%), pacing of work (42%) and help from colleagues (49%) were the most often mentioned alterations. Thirty one (24%) RA patients would like to (further) adapt their working environment. These adaptations then would consist of reduced working hours (29%), change in work pace (29%) and vocational training (26%).
Willingness to return to work
Of patients with work disability and no paid job (n = 60), 7 (12%) patients reported that they did not want a job, 40 (67%) patients reported that they would not be able to work again due to RA and 11 (18%) patients would like to work again under certain working conditions; data were missing for 2 (2%) patients. Flexible working hours and no (heavy) physically demanding occupation was the conditions most often reported for willingness to return to paid work.
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
To estimate the impact of work disability, population-based studies in which work disability rates in RA patients are compared with work disability rates of the general population are preferable [10, 21, 22]. To reliably interpret the impact of the disease on participation in the labour force, comparison with a general population is necessary, taking into account possible differences in age and gender between populations studied. Not many clinical studies have compared work disability in RA population with that of the general population, and only a few data have been adjusted for age and sex [23, 24]. Non-adjusted work disability rates in the literature range between 13% after 6 months and 60% after 11 yr of disease [9, 2528] among RA patients with a paid job at disease onset, whereas we determined rates for the total population of working age. By analysing in our study only those patients with a paid job at disease onset, (partial) work disability would be 39% after a mean disease duration of 4.2 yr.
The differences in demographic, clinical and job-related characteristics between patients with paid employment and no work disability and those with work disability were similar to those found in other cross-sectional surveys [7, 11, 29]. Given the retrospective design of our study, the associations may not necessarily implicate a causal relation. Although for some patients clinical variables were assessed for a maximum of 6 months before filling out the questionnaire, we do not think that this has caused any bias because this was done both for patients with and patients without sick leave.
One of the strengths of our study was the availability of demographic and clinical data at diagnosis, which therefore could be used in a predictive model. In agreement with other studies [5, 10, 27, 30], worse functional ability at disease onset predicted work disability in our study. It is likely that measures of disease activity did not independently predict work disability because such measures contribute to the variance in HAQ, because the HAQ score is associated with high disease activity in early RA [31]. The decline of the survival curve of work ability was most pronounced for patients having worse functional disability at baseline (data not shown); thus early improvement of functional status by aggressive treatment is likely to decrease the chance of becoming work disabled. In accordance with some other studies, type of job (i.e. blue-collar job) at baseline was also a predictor of future work disability in our study [26, 32]. It should be noted that the cross-sectional design of our study precluded assessment of job type at onset of the disease and therefore the type of the last job was imputed as the baseline job. Since 37% of the employed patients reported that they had changed their job for health reasons, it would have been interesting to know whether these patients had changed from manual jobs to non-manual jobs, for instance.
Interestingly, only 18% of the patients with work disability would be willing to work again. Further research is necessary to evaluate which patients would like to return to work and the impact of social security systems on the willingness to return to work.
![]() |
Conclusion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|