Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus septic arthritis: an emerging clinical syndrome

J. J. Ross and L. Davidson1

Division of Infectious Diseases, Caritas Saint Elizabeth's Medical Center and 1 Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases, New England Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA

Correspondence to: J. J. Ross, Division of Infectious Diseases, Caritas Saint Elizabeth's Medical Center, 736 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA 02135, USA. E-mail: jrossmd{at}cchcs.org

SIR, Despite the increasing importance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) as a nosocomial and community pathogen, little is known about the clinical characteristics of MRSA septic arthritis. Prior descriptions of native joint MRSA septic arthritis in adults are confined to case reports [1–4]. In recent European studies, 6–8% cases of septic arthritis were due to MRSA [5, 6], although these patients were not described in detail. We reviewed cases of native joint septic arthritis from the past 5 yr from our institutions to assess the prevalence and characteristics of MRSA septic arthritis, and the relative contributions of the health-care setting and the community to its epidemiology. Dichotomous variables were analysed using Fisher's exact test and continuous variables were analysed using Student's t-test.

Demographic and clinical information are summarized in Table 1. Fifteen of 59 septic arthritis cases (25%) involved MRSA. Patients with MRSA septic arthritis were significantly older than patients with non-MRSA septic arthritis (69 vs 54 yr; P = 0.003). MRSA septic arthritis patients also had a significantly greater mean number of comorbid medical conditions compared with non-MRSA septic arthritis patients (5.8 vs 2.6; P<0.0001). All 15 patients with MRSA septic arthritis had significant exposure to the health-care system. Hospitalization within the preceding 6 months was observed in 80% (12 of 15 patients) of the MRSA group compared with 34% (15 of 44 patients) of the non-MRSA septic arthritis group (P = 0.002). Of the other three MRSA patients, one had a history of MRSA bacteraemia 3 yr previously and the other two were HIV-positive intravenous drug users.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Characteristics of patients with septic arthritis due to MRSA vs those with non-MRSA septic arthritis

 
Joint involvement was similar between the two groups, except that shoulder involvement was significantly more common in MRSA cases: 6 of 15 MRSA cases (40%) vs 6 of 44 non-MRSA cases (14%), P = 0.03. This probably relates to the predisposing role of recent falls, upper extremity trauma and orthopaedic procedures among the older patient population with MRSA infection, rather than a particular tropism for the shoulder joint.

Mortality during the initial hospitalization was 3 of 15 patients (20%) in the MRSA group vs 3 of 44 patients (7%) in the non-MRSA group (P = 0.13). Six of the 12 MRSA patients who survived developed osteomyelitis in the bone adjacent to the joint. Five of the 15 patients had extra-articular foci of MRSA infection: two patients had central line sepsis, one patient had endocarditis, one patient had an epidural abscess, and one patient had infection of an abdominal aortic graft. All 12 survivors were clinically cured of septic arthritis after an average of 6 weeks of antibiotic therapy. Eleven patients received vancomycin and one patient received linezolid. Limited information was available regarding functional outcome.

Colonization or infection with MRSA during hospitalization establishes a durable risk of subsequent MRSA infection. In one study, 29% of hospitalized patients who acquired MRSA developed new or recurrent MRSA infection in the 18 months after discharge [7]. Of the 12 patients with a history of hospitalization in the preceding 6 months, seven developed symptoms of septic arthritis in patients (58%) while out in the community. Although these patients all received empirical treatment with vancomycin, failure to take into account the history of hospitalization could have resulted in inappropriately narrow empirical antibiotic coverage.

MRSA may be more virulent than methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). Approximately 1.6% of episodes of MRSA bacteraemia result in septic arthritis, a rate higher than observed for MSSA bacteraemia [8]. One meta-analysis showed a higher mortality for MRSA bacteraemia than MSSA bacteraemia, a finding that might be explained by bacterial virulence, patient factors, or the lack of rapidly bactericidal antibiotics for MRSA treatment [9]. Our experience is inadequate to determine whether MRSA septic arthritis is more aggressive than MSSA septic arthritis, particularly as the affected older population with chronic illness would be expected to have worse clinical outcomes.

Ten of 12 (83%) MRSA isolates were resistant to clindamycin. As 79% of health-care-associated MRSA strains in the USA are resistant to clindamycin, compared with only 17% of community isolates of MRSA, this suggests a predominance of MRSA septic arthritis from strains originating in the health-care system [10].

Recommendations for the treatment of septic arthritis place insufficient emphasis on the possibility of MRSA infection in individuals with health-care system exposure. As septic arthritis may cause rapid joint destruction, and delayed initiation of appropriate therapy is associated with poor outcomes, the correct choice of empirical antibiotic therapy is crucial. Patients with suspected septic arthritis who have a history of recent hospitalization, previous MRSA infection or colonization, multiple comorbid medical conditions, other risk factors for MRSA infection, such as intravenous drug use, or who live in locales with a high prevalence of community-acquired MRSA, should receive an antibiotic regimen containing vancomycin.

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ash N, Salai M, Aphter S, Olchovsky D. Primary psoas abscess due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus concurrent with septic arthritis of the hip joint. South Med J 1995;88:863–5.[ISI][Medline]
  2. Byrne PA, Hosein IK, Camilleri J. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus septic arthritis: urgent and emergent. Clin Rheumatol 1998;17:407–8.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  3. Kallarackal G, Lawson TM, Williams BD. Community-acquired septic arthritis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Rheumatology 2000;39:1304–5.[Free Full Text]
  4. Ross JJ, Shamsuddin H. Sternoclavicular septic arthritis: review of 180 cases. Medicine (Baltimore) 2004;83:139–48.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  5. Gupta MN, Sturrock RD, Field M. Prospective comparative study of patients with culture proven and high suspicion of adult onset septic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2003;62:327–31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Dubost JJ, Soubrier M, De Champs C, Ristori JM, Bussiere JL, Sauvezie B. No changes in the distribution of organisms responsible for septic arthritis over a 20 year period. Ann Rheum Dis 2002;61:267–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Huang SS, Platt R. Risk of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection after previous infection or colonization. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36:281–5.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  8. Melzer M, Eykyn SJ, Gransden WR, Chinn S. Is methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus more virulent than methicillin-susceptible S. aureus? A comparative cohort study of British patients with nosocomial infection and bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 2003;37:1453–60.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  9. Cosgrove SE, Sakoulas G, Perencevich EN, Schwaber MJ, Karchmer AW, Carmeli Y. Comparison of mortality associated with methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36:53–9.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  10. Naimi TS, LeDell KH, Como-Sabetti K et al. Comparison of community- and health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. JAMA 2003;290:2976–84.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Accepted 24 June 2005





This Article
Full Text (PDF)
All Versions of this Article:
44/9/1197    most recent
kei035v1
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Add to My Personal Archive
Download to citation manager
Disclaimer
Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Articles by Ross, J. J.
Articles by Davidson, L.
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Ross, J. J.
Articles by Davidson, L.
Related Collections
Connective tissue disease