Association of birth weight with osteoporosis and osteoarthritis in adult twins

L. Antoniades, A. J. MacGregor, T. Andrew and T. D. Spector

St Thomas' Hospital, Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology Unit, London, UK


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Participants and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Objectives. Twin studies present a unique opportunity to examine the association of birth weight with adult life phenotypes in a design that naturally accounts for maternal factors and a range of early environmental factors, which might potentially bias the association. In this study, we explored the association of birth weight with osteoporosis (OP) and osteoarthritis (OA), in a large national cohort of female twins.

Methods. Intra-pair differences between the reported birth weight of the twins (n=4008) were examined for an association with: (i) intra-pair differences in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) at the lumbar spine, hip and forearm using linear regression; and (ii) osteoarthritis status in pairs discordant for radiographic disease at the hand, hip and knee using matched logistic regression. The confounding influences of height and weight were taken into account.

Results. The mean age of the twins was 47.5±12.3 yr. Intra-pair differences in birth weight were significantly associated with BMD at the spine (P=0.047), total hip (P=0.016) and femoral neck (P<0.001), but not at the forearm (P=0.245). These were entirely explained by the birth weight association with height and weight. The associations of intra-pair differences in birth weight and BMC were highly significant (P<0.001) at all sites, but were partly explained by adjustment for adult height and weight. We found no clear association between intra-pair birth weight differences and OA in twins discordant for any of the radiographic OA phenotypes at any site.

Conclusions. Bone mass and especially BMC are highly associated with birth weight. These associations are accounted for mainly by environmental factors that are independent of maternal factors such as gestational age, maternal smoking and nutrition, and are largely mediated by skeletal size and particularly adult height. Birth weight does not appear to be a major influence on the later development of radiographic OA in women.

KEY WORDS: Birth weight, Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis, Twin study.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Participants and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Low weight and small size at birth have been linked with a predisposition to adverse health outcomes in adulthood, including hypertension, insulin resistance, coronary heart disease [1] and more recently reduced adult bone and muscle mass [25]. The reported associations between birth weight and adult disease have been found in different populations around the world, and are supported by animal experiments. Fetal programming has been proposed as a possible mechanism for these associations. The ‘fetal origins hypothesis' states that fetal undernutrition in middle to late gestation, which leads to immediate disproportionate fetal growth, can also be translated into pathology and thus determine disease in adult life [1, 6, 7].

With regard to the musculoskeletal system it has been suggested that skeletal growth and adult body composition, particularly bone and mass, might be programmed during fetal life [5]. Studies to date have examined the association of birth weight and weight in infancy with adult body composition and they have been interpreted as showing a potential fetal programming of osteoporosis risk. However, these studies were based on small numbers with inconsistent results and were prone to potential selection bias as only a small percentage of the original birth cohort participated in the study [25]. If birth weight does indeed have an effect on body composition, it is possible to speculate that an effect may also be seen for osteoarthritis. However, this has not been examined.

Studies showing birth weight influences on adult phenotypes are controversial because of their susceptibility to bias. Environmental or maternal factors represent one of the main confounders of the fetal origin hypothesis, as it is based on the assumption of intrauterine programming due to nutritional constriction at critical periods of fetal development. A purely genetic explanation of the association between birth weight and later phenotypes remains possible.

Twin studies present a unique experimental setting in which the fetal programming hypothesis can be examined [8, 9]. The St Thomas' twin unit has been gathering data on twins since 1993 related to a range of diseases of ageing. We explored the association of birth weight with osteoporosis (OP) and osteoarthritis (OA) in a large national cohort of female twins, using intra-pair differences in birth weight and subsequent adult phenotypes. This study design controls for maternal behavioural and sociodemographic characteristics known to influence birth weight. Potential confounding due to genetic factors is greatly reduced, and among monozygotic twins, eliminated.


    Participants and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Participants and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Participants
The analysis used data from the St Thomas' UK Adult Twin Register, which comprises unselected healthy volunteers, recruited through successive national media campaign [10]. Only data from white, female twin pairs were included in the analysis. None of the women were known to suffer from any disease causing secondary OA and OP and were broadly representative of the normal British population [11]. Ethical approval was obtained from St Thomas' Hospital ethical committee and full informed written consent was obtained. The data included anthropometric and lifestyle variables collected through both a standardized nurse-administered questionnaire and clinical examination. Information on recalled birth weight was requested 2 weeks before the twins' visit and they were encouraged to consult their mothers to confirm the answers [12]. Zygosity was determined by a standardized questionnaire and was confirmed when necessary by multiplex DNA fingerprinting.

Bone measurements
Bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) were measured at the lumbar spine (L1–L4) in the anteroposterior (AP) projection, the non-dominant hip (femoral neck, total hip) and the non-dominant forearm, using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (Hologic QDR-2000 DXA scanner—Hologic, Inc. Waltham, MA, USA). Reproducibility has been assessed by performing duplicate scans of 40 normal volunteers and was between 0.6 and 1.6% depending on the site scanned.

Osteoarthritis measurements
The radiographic features of osteoarthritis (ROA), such as the presence of osteophytes and narrowing of the joint space were examined at three sites.

Hand. Plain posteroanterior (PA) hand radiographs with the hands placed flat, at a tube–film distance of 100 cm were obtained. Fifteen joints were assessed in each hand: five distal interphalangeal joints, four proximal interphalangeal, the first carpometacarpal joint and five metacarpophalangeal joints.

Knee. Anteroposterior weight-bearing and skyline views were obtained at a tube–film distance of 100 cm. Osteophytes and joint space narrowing graded from 0 to 3 were read in the tibiofemoral lateral and medial and patellofemoral compartments.

The summary grade for each joint of the hand and each knee was based on the Kellgren and Lawrence (K&L) grading system (0–4). An individual was considered to have radiographic OA of the hands if at least grade 2 K&L was present in two or more hand joints and ROA of the knee if at least grade 2 K&L was present in either or both knees.

Osteophytes and joint space narrowing were separately evaluated and graded from 0 to 3 for increasing severity with 1+ being considered positive.

Hip. Pelvic radiographs were obtained in supine AP position with a standard tube–film distance of 100 cm and the feet positioned in 15° of internal rotation. We used the Croft grading system (0–5), a modification of the K&L scale specifically developed for hip OA. Cases were defined by a minimum grade of 1 with definite osteophytes [13].

A single observer, who was blind to the zygosity and pairings, assessed the radiographs for each site. If an abnormality was seen, the radiographs were read independently by a second observer, and if there was a discrepancy, the opinion of a third specialist was asked.

Reproducibility. The intra-observer reproducibility for each site was estimated using a weighted kappa statistic and found to be satisfactory ranging from 0.69 to 0.93 for different radiological sites and features.

Confounding variables
Height and weight were considered as potential confounding variables as it is known that birth weight is positively related to adult body size [14] and also has been related to OA and BMD. The effect of other known lifestyle determinants of bone loss including lifetime alcohol consumption (cut-off of 15 units/week), ever smoking, drug use such as steroids and history of heavy physical activity reported during the last 12 months [15] were also considered in the analysis.

Statistical methods
Intra-pair differences in self-reported birth weight were regressed upon intra-pair differences in bone measurements using linear regression for all twins and subsequently stratified by zygosity. Adjustment was made for potential confounding variables, also calculated as intra-pair differences. Significant differences were defined as a P value of less than 0.05 using two-tailed tests.

For radiographic features of osteoarthritis, conditional logistic regression analysis for matched case–control groups was used to investigate the relationship with birth weight.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Participants and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Data from 4008 twins were analysed, consisting of 604 monozygotic (MZ) and 1400 dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs. Table 1Go contains anthropometric and lifestyle characteristics and distribution of bone mineral measurements in the twins as a whole and stratified by zygosity. Slight differences between MZ and DZ twin pairs were seen for age, weight, body mass index (BMI) and menopausal status, but this did not influence the intra-pair analysis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Twin Characteristics

 
Birth weight and bone mass
A total of 1411 twin pairs provided complete information on self-reported birth weight and bone measurements. The mean birth weight of our twins was 2.39 kg.

Low birth weight (LBW) <2 kg was reported in 26%. These LBW twins had significantly lower BMD at the hip (P<0.01) and forearm (P<0.05) compared with the heavier twins (birth weight >2 kg). The difference did not reach significant levels at the spine (P=0.0947).

Bone mineral density (BMD). Intra-pair differences in birth weight were significantly associated with intra-pair differences in BMD at the spine (P=0.047), total hip (P=0.016) and femoral neck (P<0.001), but not the forearm.

When MZ twins (n=445) were examined separately, higher regression coefficients were found at all studied sites (spine P<0.001, total hip P=0.009, femoral neck P<0.001, forearm P<0.001), whereas in DZ twins (n=966) the intra-pair differences in birth weight were significantly associated with the intra-pair differences in BMD only at the femoral neck (P<0.001).

However, none of the above associations remained significant after adjustment for intra-pair differences in height and weight (Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Associations of intra-pair differences in birth weight with intra-pair differences in bone mineral density

 
Bone mineral content (BMC). The association of intra-pair differences in birth weight with intra-pair differences in BMC were highly significant (P<0.001) at all measured sites: spine, hip (total and femoral neck) and forearm.

When MZ and DZ twins were examined separately, the non-adjusted associations of intra-pair differences in birth weight with intra-pair differences in BMC were highly significant in both groups and at all sites.

Adjustment for intra-pair differences in weight and height removed the significance of the associations in DZs and the group as a whole. Interestingly, the associations remained significant after adjustment for intra-pair differences in height and weight only in MZ twins (spine P=0.026, femoral neck P=0.041, forearm P=0.035) (Table 3Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Associations of intra pair differences in birth weight with intra pair differences in bone mineral content

 
Additional adjustment for other lifestyle variables, including alcohol consumption, smoking, steroid use and physical activity did not significantly alter the associations.

Birth weight and radiographic osteoarthritis
There were no statistically significant intra-pair differences in birth weight in twins who were discordant for any of the radiographic OA phenotypes examined. These were: overall OA, presence of osteophytes, joint space narrowing at the hands, knees and hips. Similarly, no association was found when MZ and DZ twins were examined separately for all analyses (Table 4Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Association of intra-pair differences in birth weight in twins discordant for ROA

 


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Participants and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In a large cohort of female twins we have shown that birth weight is associated with adult bone mass and that this association is independent of parental confounding. The association was strongest for BMC and less marked but significant for BMD and appeared to be largely mediated by skeletal size, particularly height. This is the first study to show a clear association independent of maternal factors. No association was found between birth weight and the development of radiographic OA in later life.

The majority of epidemiological studies on fetal programming, including twin studies, have examined birth weight in relation to subsequent development of cardiovascular disease, hypertension and non-insulin-dependent diabetes [16, 17]. Although rickets has served as a paradigm of how undernutrition at a critical stage of early life can lead to persisting structural changes [7], there is a scarcity of studies in the literature exploring the fetal programming of musculoskeletal diseases. This is partly due to practical difficulties of such a study; for instance, seeking out birth records of half a century ago has the inevitable problems of incomplete samples, missing records and follow-up, which can all lead to selection bias and small sample sizes.

Cooper et al. [2, 3] have suggested that the trajectory of bone growth might be programmed during fetal and early post-natal life. They have shown weak associations of infant weight with adult bone mineral content that disappeared after correction for bone area, specifically adult height. More recently the same group suggested birth weight to be a predictor of both BMC and BMD even after adjustment for adult height. However, confidence intervals for their estimates were wide, especially for females, as the study was based on data from only 41 women [5].

Our findings were based on a large number of twin pairs, exploiting the advantages of a twin study design and overcoming many of the practical problems of cohort studies. Fetal programming has been considered to be the result of undernutrition and other adverse influences during critical periods of development, many of them attributed to maternal factors [18]. Furthermore, epidemiological studies have shown maternal characteristics such as maternal birth weight [19], gestational and maternal age, height and body composition, maternal smoking, drug use, nutrition and social class also to be determinants of birth weight [20]. Hence, parental and especially maternal factors play a potentially crucial role on the observed associations of low birth weight with adult disease phenotypes. By investigating intra-pair differences in twins, parental confounding factors, as well as unknown environmental and genetic factors, were controlled for and the significant associations we found were independent of these factors.

Epidemiological studies both in twins [21, 22] and unrelated individuals [23, 24] have shown a consistent association between birth weight and adult skeleton size, particularly height. This is in accordance with our finding of more pronounced associations with BMC, which is the most size-dependent measurement. Furthermore, adjustment for adult weight and height attenuated, and in most instances removed, the effect of birth weight on bone measurements. This indicates the associations were largely mediated by adult skeleton size. Notably, height accounted for most of the association of birth weight with BMC.

The finding of stronger associations in MZ twins, who are entirely matched for genetic factors, is of interest. Poulsen et al. [25] reached similar findings when studying the metabolic syndrome in twins. Both observations point to an intrauterine environmental interpretation of the associations. In our twin cohort, MZ twins had greater intra-pair variability in birth weight than DZ. This is a well established observation and has been attributed to the unequal competition for nutrients or placental blood supply between monochorionic MZs (sharing a placenta) [26, 27]. In spite of substantial intra-pair birth weight differences and differences in prenatal environment of monochorionic and dichorionic MZ twins, a recent study of the East Flanders Twin Survey [28] using data on placentation found no difference in intra-pair concordance of adult anthropometry.

Our interest in testing the role of fetal programming in osteoarthritis arose from the following evidence: obesity and osteoarthritis have been consistently linked [29]; skeletal growth and developmental abnormalities have been shown to predispose to premature hip OA [30]; and the presence and severity of osteophytes are strongly related with higher bone mass [13]. There are also potential biological mediators of the examined association. Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 plays a major role in prenatal development [31] and has been suggested as a candidate endocrine system of fetal programming [32]. In addition, synthesis of cartilage components appears to be dependent on a number of growth factors and disruption of the IGF axis might influence disease progression in OA [33, 34]. In contrast to OP phenotypes, we found no intra-pair differences in birth weights in twins discordant for radiographic OA phenotypes.

We had 99.9% power to rule out a 10% difference in birth weight (235 g) between the discordant for ROA twins. Thus our study excludes any major role of birth weight on developing radiographic OA in women, although a minor association or an effect in men is still possible.

Several potential limitations need to be addressed in our study. Birth weights were self-reported and the validity of recall data has been questioned. However, studies that addressed the problem have found that the validity of the method is acceptable in population settings [35, 36]. In the same cohort of twins, our group confirmed other observations of a birth effect on adult hypertension independent of maternal factors [12]. Moreover, our twin cohort had similar recalled birth weights to other British twin cohorts of the same age range [37]. Another potential concern is representativeness. Although twins have been thought to be ideal for studying fetal programming [38], it has been argued that low birth weight in twins does not have the same implication as low birth weight in singletons [37, 39]. However, as our results mirror earlier results in singletons [5] and mean levels and variance of bone and joint parameters are similar to singletons [11], this is unlikely to be a major concern.

In conclusion, we have shown a clear association between birth weight and bone mass mediated through skeletal size, confirming the importance of fetal programming in skeletal development. The study suggests maternal factors are not responsible, implying that fetal nutrition and placental factors play a key role in the development of the skeleton.


    Notes
 
Correspondence to: L. Antoniades. E-mail: leto.antoniades{at}twin-research.ac.uk Back


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Participants and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Barker DJ. Fetal origins of coronary heart disease. Br Med J 1995;311:171–4.[Free Full Text]
  2. Cooper C, Cawley M, Bhalla A et al. Childhood growth, physical activity, and peak bone mass in women. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:940–7.[ISI][Medline]
  3. Cooper C, Fall C, Egger P, Hobbs R, Eastell R, Barker D. Growth in infancy and bone mass in later life. Ann Rheum Dis 1997;56:17–21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Cooper C, Walker-Bone K, Arden N, Dennison E. Novel insights into the pathogenesis of osteoporosis: the role of intrauterine programming. Rheumatology 2000;39:1312–5.[Free Full Text]
  5. Gale CR, Martyn CN., Kellingray S, Eastell R, Cooper C. Intrauterine programming of adult body composition. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:267–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Barker DJ. The Wellcome Foundation Lecture, 1994. The fetal origins of adult disease. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1995;262:37–43.[ISI][Medline]
  7. Barker DJ. Intrauterine programming of adult disease. Mol Med Today 1995;1:418–23.[ISI][Medline]
  8. Leon DA. Twins and fetal programming of blood pressure. Questioning the role of genes and maternal nutrition. Br Med J 1999;319:1313–4.[Free Full Text]
  9. Leon DA. The foetal origins of adult disease: interpreting the evidence from twin studies. Twin Res 2001;4:321–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Boomsma DI. Twin registers in Europe: an overview. Twin Res 1998;1:34–51.[Medline]
  11. Andrew T, Hart DJ, Snieder H, de Lange M, Spector TD, Macgregor AJ. Are twins and singletons comparable? A study of disease-related and lifestyle characteristics in adult women. Twin Res 2001;4:464–77.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Poulter NR, Chang CL, Macgregor AJ, Snieder H, Spector TD. Association between birth weight and adult blood pressure in twins: historical cohort study. Br Med J 1999;319:1330–3.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Antoniades L, Macgregor AJ, Matson M, Spector TD. A cotwin control study of the relationship between hip osteoarthritis and bone mineral density. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43:1450–5.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  14. Lucas A, Fewtrell MS, Cole TJ. Fetal origins of adult disease—the hypothesis revisited. Br Med J 1999;319:245–9.[Free Full Text]
  15. Spector TD, Harris PA, Hart DJ et al. Risk of osteoarthritis associated with long-term weight-bearing sports: a radiologic survey of the hips and knees in female ex-athletes and population controls. Arthritis Rheum 1996;39:988–95.[ISI][Medline]
  16. Law CM, Shiell AW. Is blood pressure inversely related to birth weight? The strength of evidence from a systematic review of the literature. J Hypertens 1996;14:935–41.[ISI][Medline]
  17. Phipps K, Barker DJ, Hales CN, Fall CH, Osmond C, Clark PM. Fetal growth and impaired glucose tolerance in men and women. Diabetologia 1993;36:225–8.[ISI][Medline]
  18. Barker DJ. In utero programming of chronic disease. Clin Sci (Colch) 1998;95:115–28.[ISI][Medline]
  19. Wang X, Zuckerman B, Coffman GA, Corwin MJ. Familial aggregation of low birth weight among whites and blacks in the United States. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1744–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Goldstein H. Factors related to birth weight and perinatal mortality. Br Med Bull 1981;37:259–64.[ISI][Medline]
  21. Allison DB, Paultre F, Heymsfield SB, Pi-Sunyer FX. Is the intra-uterine period really a critical period for the development of adiposity? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1995;19:397–402.[Medline]
  22. Ijzerman RG, Stehouwer CDA, van Weissenbruch M, deGeus EJ, Boomsa DI. Intra-uterine and genetic influences on the relationship between size at birth and height in later life: analysis in twins. Twin Res 2001;4:337–43.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Nilsen ST, Finne PH, Bergsjo P, Stamnes O. Males with low birthweight examined at 18 years of age. Acta Paediatr Scand 1984;73:168–75.[ISI][Medline]
  24. Leger J, Levy-Marchal C, Bloch J et al. Reduced final height and indications for insulin resistance in 20 year olds born small for gestational age: regional cohort study. Br Med J 1997;315:341–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Poulsen P, Vaag A, Beck-Nielsen H. Does zygosity influence the metabolic profile of twins? A population based cross sectional study. Br Med J 1999;319:151–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Phillips DI. Twin studies in medical research. Lancet 1993;342:52.
  27. Poulsen P, Vaag A. Glucose and insulin metabolism in twins: influence of zygosity and birth weight. Twin Res 2001;4:350–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Loos R, Beunen G, Fagard R, Derom C, Walker BR. The influence of zygosity and chorion type on fat distribution in young adult twins. Consequences for twin studies. Twin Res 2001;4:356–64.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Felson DT. Epidemiology of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Epidemiol Rev 1988;10:1–28.[ISI][Medline]
  30. Antoniades L, Spector TD, Macgregor AJ. The genetic contribution to hip joint morphometry and relationship to hip cartilage thickness. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001;9:593–5.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  31. Le Roith D, Scavo L, Butler A. What is the role of circulating IGF-I? Trends Endocrinol Metab 2001;12:48–52.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  32. Fall C, Hindmarsh P, Dennison E, Kellingray S, Barker D, Cooper C. Programming of growth hormone secretion and bone mineral density in elderly men: a hypothesis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998;83:135–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Denko CW, Malemud CJ. Metabolic disturbances and synovial joint responses in osteoarthritis. Front Biosci 1999;4:D686–D693.[Medline]
  34. Martel-Pelletier J, Di Battista JA, Lajeunesse D, Pelletier JP. IGF/IGFBP axis in cartilage and bone in osteoarthritis pathogenesis. Inflamm Res 1998;47:90–100.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  35. Troy LM, Michels KB, Hunter DJ et al. Self-reported birthweight and history of having been breastfed among younger women: an assessment of validity. Int J Epidemiol 1996;25:122–7.[Abstract]
  36. Little RE. Birthweight and gestational age: mothers' estimates compared with state and hospital records. Am J Public Health 1986;76:1350–1.[Abstract]
  37. Baird J, Osmond C, MacGregor A, Snieder H, Hales CN, Phillips DI. Testing the fetal origins hypothesis in twins: the Birmingham twin study. Diabetologia 2001;44:33–9.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  38. Paneth N, Susser M. Early origin of coronary heart disease (the ‘Barker hypothesis’). Br Med J 1995;310:411–2.[Free Full Text]
  39. Phillips DI, Davies MJ, Robinson JS. Fetal growth and the fetal origins hypothesis in twins—problems and perspectives. Twin Res 2001;4:327–31.[CrossRef][Medline]
Submitted 20 May 2002; Accepted 3 December 2002