Biomechanics Laboratory, Rheumatology & Rehabilitation Research Unit, Research School of Medicine, University of Leeds, 36 Clarendon Road, Leeds LS2 9NZ, UK
Correspondence to:
B. B. Seedhom, Biomechanics Laboratory, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Research Unit, University of Leeds, 36 Clarendon Road, Leeds LS2 9NZ, UK.
![]() |
Abstract |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Methods. The velocity of sound in articular cartilage was measured in an in vitro study of one set of ipsilateral human ankle and hip joints at 69 test sites. Its variability was determined.
Results. The velocity of sound in human articular cartilage measured in situ varied widely (14192428 m/s; mean: 1892 m/s; S.D. 183 m/s) and therefore the error in the thickness of cartilage obtained from ultrasonic measurement based upon a constant velocity of sound could be as large as 33.6% (mean 7.38%; S.D. 6.25%).
Conclusions. The ultrasonic pulseecho technique is not accurate for the measurement of the thickness of cartilage in situ. An alternative (albeit minimally invasive) would be the needling technique. This requires the development of a specialized probe.
KEY WORDS: Cartilage, Ultrasound, Thickness
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
To measure the cartilage thickness, X-ray imaging of the joint space has been used routinely in rheumatological clinics. This technique, however, has a major limitation; the measured joint space is the sum of the two opposing cartilage layers of the joint and hence no information can be extracted for the thickness of the individual cartilage layer. One promising alternative is the quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique which is currently being developed for this purpose by Tyler and colleagues [1], among others. The potential limitation of this technique in widespread clinical applications is its high cost. The ultrasonic measurement technique could therefore be an economical alternative to the quantitative MRI, if it yields accurate results.
The aim of the present preliminary study was, therefore, to explore the possibility of using the ultrasonic technique for the measurement of cartilage thickness. The accuracy of the ultrasonic measurement was assessed against that of an established technique [2].
Knowing the velocity of sound in a specific material, the thickness of a layer of that material can be determined from the measurement of the time period taken by the sound wave to travel through the whole thickness of the layer. In the case of human articular cartilage, however, the velocity of sound may vary widely due to the heterogeneity of the tissue, and so it may vary topographically across the articular surface. If such a variation is significant, then the ultrasonic measurement of cartilage thickness may be problematic, since the a priori assumption of the value of velocity of sound may introduce large errors in the calculated thickness. In a recent study where various techniques for measuring cartilage thickness were compared, Jurvelin et al. [3] expressed the same concern as to the validity of using a constant velocity of sound in cartilage.
This paper reports the results of a preliminary investigation to determine the values of the velocity of ultrasound signals travelling through cartilage layers in situ at numerous sites across the whole articular surface of one set of cadaveric ipsilateral ankle and hip joints.
![]() |
Materials and methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
A mesh was drawn on the articular surface using a soft, felt-tipped pen dipped in haematoxylin. Measurements were made at the centre of each rectangular grid. In total, 69 test sites were measured (17 on the ankle tibial surface, 12 on the ankle talar surface, 27 on the femoral head surface and 13 on the acetabular cup surface). Two sets of measurements were made at each test site: (a) the time interval for the ultrasound wave to travel through the cartilage layer using the non-destructive pulseecho technique; and (b) the thickness of the cartilage using the needling technique developed in our laboratory [2]. During the tests, cartilage specimens were immersed in physiological saline solution to avoid dehydration.
A Panametric pulser/receiver dual piezoelectric transducer (Model M316, focal length 0.75 inch, frequency 20 mHz, aperture 0.125 inch) was used in this study. It was excited by a pulse signal generated by an associated electronic circuit to send an ultrasonic wave, with the saline solution as the couplant, towards the specimen. The transducer was pointed perpendicularly to the articular surface. When the wave front hit the articular surface of the cartilage layer and, subsequently, the cartilage/bone interface, two echoes were generated and received by the transducer. From the echoes, the time period for the sound wave to travel through the thickness of the cartilage layer was obtained. The measurement accuracy of the technique was determined using carbon steel gauge blocks and ultra-high-molecular-weight-polyethylene (UHMWPE) discs. Simple linear regression analysis showed that the thickness was linearly correlated with the time interval for the ultrasonic wave to travel through the thickness of the specimen (r=0.99986 and r=0.99995 for the UHMWPE and steel calibration specimens, respectively). Furthermore, the coefficients of variation in the velocity of sound were found to be 0.44 and 0.58% for the UHMWPE and steel specimens, respectively. This would result in similar percentages of errors in the thickness measurement with this technique.
The needling technique for the measurement of the cartilage thickness can be described briefly as follows (see also Fig. 1). The joint specimen was held rigidly in a holder and a sharp needle was pushed vertically into the cartilage layer under a constant load. A sensitive piezoelectric load cell detected the load signal and identified the instances for the needle to contact the articular surface and the cartilage/bone interface. A linear variable differential displacement transducer (LVDT) was simultaneously used to measure continuously the position of the needle and hence, identified the distance for the needle to have travelled between the instances of surface and bone contacts. This distance was the thickness of the cartilage at the specific test site [2]. The measurement accuracy of this technique was determined using silicone rubber specimens adhered on to aluminium plates. The coefficient of variation in the thickness was found to be 1.2% [2]. Once these measurements had been completed, the velocity of sound travelling through the cartilage layer at each test site was calculated from the thickness value measured using the needling technique and the sound travelling period.
|
![]() |
Results and discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
On the other hand, because of this wide variation of velocity of sound in cartilage which we have found in this preliminary investigation, a potential useful application of the ultrasonic measurement technique could be found in monitoring the mechanical properties of cartilage. This can be achieved if the thickness of cartilage can be measured by other means such as the quantitative MRI technique [1], which is non-invasive, or by the needling technique, which may be minimally invasive. This latter technique, however, would require the development of a special probe for use in the operating theatre.
The following conclusions can be reached from this preliminary study.
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|