Inflammation influences vascular remodeling through AT2 receptor expression and signaling

MASAHIRO AKISHITA1, MASATSUGU HORIUCHI1, HIROYUKI YAMADA1, LUNAN ZHANG1, GOTARO SHIRAKAMI1, KOUICHI TAMURA1, YASUYOSHI OUCHI2 and VICTOR J. DZAU1

1 Cardiovascular Research, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
2 Department of Geriatric Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Akishita, Masahiro, Masatsugu Horiuchi, Hiroyuki Yamada, Lunan Zhang, Gotaro Shirakami, Kouichi Tamura, Yasuyoshi Ouchi, and Victor J. Dzau. Inflammation influences vascular remodeling through AT2 receptor expression and signaling. Physiol. Genomics 2: 13–20, 2000.—The AT2 receptor, which exerts growth inhibitory effects in cell culture, is present scantily in the adult vasculature but is reexpressed after vascular injury. To examine the in vivo role of this receptor in vascular diseases, we developed a mouse model of vascular remodeling and compared the responses in wild-type (Agtr2+) and AT2 receptor knockout (Agtr2-) mice. Polyethylene cuff placement on the femoral artery led to the vascular expression of cytokines, the transcriptional factor interferon regulatory factor-1 (IRF-1), and both the AT1 and AT2 receptors. Although the expressions of IRF-1 and AT1 receptor were induced to comparable levels in both the Agtr2+ and Agtr2- mice, the neointimal lesion size and the smooth muscle cell proliferation were twice greater in the Agtr2- than in the Agtr2+ mouse. Correlated with this difference, AT2 receptor expression was induced predominantly in the smooth muscle cells of Agtr2+ mouse. These results demonstrate that the AT2 receptor plays an important role in nonocclusive inflammatory injury by mediating the effects of inflammation on vascular smooth muscle growth inhibition.

angiotensin; smooth muscle; artery; proliferation; apoptosis


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
THE PEPTIDE angiotensin II (ANG II) exerts hemodynamic, renal, and electrolyte effects, as well as effects on the structure of the heart and vasculature. Many, if not all, of the actions of ANG II are mediated by the well-characterized type 1 (AT1) receptor, whereas the functions of the recently cloned type 2 (AT2) receptor (19, 25) are still unclear. It has been demonstrated that the levels of the AT2 receptor in the aorta are very low (or undetectable) during early embryonic development but are very high during the later stages of development and in the neonate (34, 41). Following birth, the level of this receptor declines rapidly. In certain pathological conditions such as vascular injury, the AT2 receptor is reexpressed (26).

In vitro studies have shown that the AT2 receptor can mediate growth inhibition in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) (26), coronary endothelial cells (36), PC12W cells (a rat pheochromocytoma cell line) (24), and cardiomyocytes (2). Also, the AT2 receptor can stimulate differentiation in neuronal cells (22, 24) and/or apoptosis in PC12W cells (13, 44), R3T3 mouse fibroblasts (15), and endothelial cells (3). However, it is critical to point out that the in vivo relevance of these effects has not been proven. Using in vivo gene transfer, we have demonstrated that overexpression of the AT2 receptor transgene inhibited the subsequent development of the neointima, at least in part, by a reduction in DNA synthesis of the medial cells (26). However, the use of gene transfer does not fully address the endogenous pathophysiological function of this receptor. Moreover, we have demonstrated that AT2 receptor expression in vitro can be regulated by interferon regulatory factors (IRF) (14, 15), suggesting that the inflammatory response in vascular disease may regulate AT2 receptor expression. Taken together, these results suggest that upregulation of AT2 receptor in diseased vessel may play an important role in the pathogenesis of vascular remodeling.

In this study, we hypothesize that the inflammatory response to vascular pathological stimuli results in the release of cytokines [such as interferon-{gamma} (IFN-{gamma})], which induces the expression of IRF-1 in cytokine-responsive cells. IRF-1 subsequently stimulates AT2 receptor expression that modulates VSMC proliferation and vascular remodeling.

We have generated an AT2 receptor knockout mouse strain (11) that provides us with a unique opportunity to address the pathophysiological role of the AT2 receptor in vascular inflammation and remodeling. This mouse strain develops normally but shows an impaired locomotor activity as well as an increased vasopressor response to ANG II (11). These phenotypes were confirmed by another AT2 receptor null strain (17). To define the in vivo role of the endogenous AT2 receptor in vascular remodeling, we developed a model of vascular disease induced by polyethylene cuff placement around the mouse femoral artery. Supporting our hypothesis, the result showed that the neointima lesion was significantly greater in the AT2 receptor knockout (Agtr2-) than the wild-type (Agtr2+) mice.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

Animals.
Adult male Agtr2- and Agtr2+ mice were used in this study. Since the AT2 receptor gene is located on the X chromosome, heterozygous females were mated with Agtr2+ males to obtain hemizygous and Agtr2+ males. Animal genotyping was performed as previously described (11). In the comparison studies between Agtr2- and Agtr2+ mice, pairs of Agtr2+ and Agtr2- littermates were used. These mice, back-crossed for five generations into the FVB/N background, had 97% FVB/N and 3% 129/SV background on average. All mice used in this study were 10–12 wk of age and weighed 25–30 g. The mice were housed in a room where lighting was controlled (12 h lights on, 12 h lights off) and room temperature was kept at 22°C. They were given standard diet and water ad libitum. All experimental procedures were approved and carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the Harvard Medical Area Standing Committee on Animals.

Cuff placement.
The surgical procedures of cuff placement was performed according to the method described previously (1, 12) with some modification. The mice were anesthetized with ketamine (70 mg/kg) and xylazine (4 mg/kg) by intraperitoneal injection. The left femoral artery of the mouse was isolated from the surrounding tissues. A polyethylene tube (2-mm long PE-90; inner diameter, 0.86 mm; outer diameter, 1.27 mm; Becton-Dickinson) was cut longitudinally to open the tube, loosely placed around the artery and closed with suture. After the experimental period, the mice were killed by an overdose of the anesthesia and perfused with PBS via a catheter placed in the thoracic aorta. Subsequently, the artery was perfusion-fixed at 100 mmHg with 10% neutral buffered Formalin. The cuffed artery was removed and microdissected from the cuff. The arterial tissue was then postfixed in 10% neutral buffered Formalin overnight, dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin. For immunohistochemistry, the artery was perfusion-fixed and immersion-fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, cryoprotected in 20% sucrose in PBS, embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT compound (Sakura Finetek, Torrance, CA), and frozen in liquid nitrogen. For RNA and DNA preparation, the tissues were dissected after PBS perfusion, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C. Some Agtr2+ mice were treated with the AT2 receptor antagonist, PD-123319 (Research Biochemicals International, Natick, MA). Alzet micro-osmotic pumps (model 1002; Alza, Palo Alto, CA) were implanted intraperitoneally at the time of cuff placement surgery. The pumps delivered vehicle (PBS) or PD-123319 (20 mg/kg per day) (26) continuously for 14 days at a rate of 0.25 µl/h.

Hemodynamics measurement.
In some Agtr2+ and Agtr2- mice, hemodynamic changes after cuff placement were monitored. A polyethylene catheter (PE-10; Becton-Dickinson) was inserted into the right femoral artery, tunneled under the skin, and exteriorized at the back of the neck. The mice were allowed to recover overnight, then arterial pressure and heart rate were recorded over 60 min in a conscious and unrestrained condition through the catheter connected to a Statham pressure transducer.

Morphometric analysis.
The middle segment of the artery was cut into three subserial cross sections with 5 µm thickness at an interval of 0.3 mm. The sections were stained by Elastica van Gieson staining and photographed together with a microscale. The areas of the neointima, the media, and the adventitia were measured using an image analyzing software (NIH image) by an observer blinded as to the animal genotype or the treatment. Neointima was defined as the area between the vessel lumen and the internal elastic lamina. Media was defined as the area between the internal and external elastic lamina. Adventitia was defined as the area outside the external elastic lamina. The average of three sections was taken as the value for each animal.

Measurement of DNA synthesis.
Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU; Sigma) was injected 100 mg/kg sc and 30 mg/kg ip at 18 h prior to death and then 30 mg/kg ip at 12 h prior to death (26). Section preparation was done in the same manner as morphometric analysis. Immunohistochemistry using anti-BrdU antibody was performed according to the manufacturer's protocol (BrdU Staining Kit; Zymed Laboratories, South San Francisco, CA). The sections were counterstained with hematoxylin, and the BrdU index, the ratio of BrdU-positive nuclei vs. total nuclei, was calculated. The numbers of the nuclei were counted by an observer blinded as to the animal genotype. The average index of three sections was taken as the value for each animal.

Immunohistochemistry.
Frozen sections (5 µm thick) were immunohistochemically stained by streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase method using a kit (Histostain-SP Kit; Zymed Laboratories). Briefly, endogenous peroxidase and the nonspecific binding of the antibody were blocked with 3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol and 10% FBS in PBS, respectively. Primary antibody diluted in 10% FBS in PBS was applied to the sections and incubated for 16–24 h at 4°C. Subsequently, biotinylated secondary antibody and then streptavidin-peroxidase conjugate were applied. Positive staining was visualized using diaminobenzidine. VSMCs and leukocytes were stained using anti-{alpha}-smooth muscle actin antibody (clone 1A4; Sigma; diluted 1:400) and anti-CD45/common leukocyte antigen antibody (clone 30F11.1, diluted 1:100; PharMingen, San Diego, CA), respectively. The AT2 receptor was stained using the polyclonal antibody raised against a synthetic amino-terminal peptide (diluted 1:250; gift from Dr. Robert M. Carey, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center). The characteristics of this antibody have been reported previously (28).

RT-PCR.
RNA was prepared from the pooled samples (n = 5–7 for each group) using TRIzol reagent (GIBCO-BRL). First-strand cDNA was synthesized using reverse transcriptase with random hexamers from 1 µg total RNA in 20 µl reaction volume according to the manufacturer's protocol (GeneAmp RNA PCR Kit; Perkin-Elmer), then one-tenth of the resulting reverse transcription (RT) product was applied to each 25 µl PCR. The PCR reactions contained 1.5 mM Mg2+, 0.2 µM primers, 0.2 mM dNTPs, and 2.5 U/100 µl Taq DNA polymerase (AmpliTaq DNA polymerase; Perkin-Elmer). PCR primers used for IFN-{gamma}, interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß), IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} (TNF-{alpha}), IRF-1, AT1 receptor, AT2 receptor, and glyceraldehyde phosphodehydrogenase (GAPDH) are listed in Table 1. PCRs except for GAPDH were carried out with 30 cycles of 1 min of denaturation at 94°C, 1 min of annealing at 55°C, and 2 min of extension at 72°C, followed by 10 min of final extension step. PCRs for GAPDH were carried out with 25 cycles. PCR products were separated by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis and were detected as a single band of the expected size in each PCR shown in the Figs. 13. The results shown in Figs. 1A, 1B, and 3 are representative of two independent RT-PCR reactions using the same RNA pool and two RT-PCR reactions using a second pool of RNA. The results shown in Fig. 2 are representative of two independent RT-PCR reactions using the same RNA pool.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Primer sequences for RT-PCR

 


View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. RT-PCR analysis for interferon-{gamma} (IFN-{gamma}), interleukins IL-1ß and IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} (TNF-{alpha}) mRNA (A) and for AT1 receptor, AT2 receptor, and interferon regulatory factor-1 (IRF-1) mRNA (B) in the cuffed mouse femoral artery. Polyethylene cuff was placed around the left femoral artery of the wild-type (Agtr2+) mouse. Cuffed arteries at the indicated days and control intact arteries were harvested and frozen. Pooled samples (n = 5–7 for each time point) were used for RNA preparation. RT-PCR products were electrophoresed on agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. Glyceraldehyde phosphodehydrogenase (GAPDH) served as the internal control. One representative result of four independent RT-PCR (each two from different pools of tissue samples) is shown.

 


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. RT-PCR analysis for AT1 receptor and AT2 receptor mRNA in the cuffed mouse femoral artery of the wild-type (Agtr2+, WT) and AT2 receptor null (Agtr2-, KO) mice. Cuffed arteries at the indicated days and control intact arteries were harvested and frozen. Pooled samples (n = 5–7 for each time point) were used for RNA preparation. RT-PCR products were electrophoresed on agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. GAPDH served as the internal control. One representative result of four independent RT-PCR (each two from different pools of tissue samples) is shown.

 



View larger version (136K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. RT-PCR analysis for the localization of AT1 receptor, AT2 receptor, and IRF-1 mRNA (A) and immunohistochemistry for the localization of AT2 receptor (B–D). Cuffed arteries at 7 days (7d) in wild-type mice were harvested and micro-separated into two layers, media/intima layers (lane 3) and adventitial layers (lane 4). These tissues as well as the intact arteries (lane 1) and the whole cuffed arteries at 7 days (lane 2) were pooled (n = 7) and used for RT-PCR. Numbers in the cartoon (A, right) correspond to lanes 1–4. One representative result of two independent RT-PCR is shown. Frozen sections prepared from cuffed arteries at 7 days in wild-type mice were stained with antibody to AT2 receptor (B), anti-{alpha}-smooth muscle (SM) actin antibody (C), or anti-CD45/common leukocyte antigen antibody (D). Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. Magnification x400; bar = 20 µm.

 
Data analysis.
The values in the text and Figs. 4 and 5 are expressed as means ± SE. The data were analyzed using one-factor ANOVA. If a statistically significant effect was found, then the Newman-Keuls test was performed to isolate the difference between the groups. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.




View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. A: representative cross sections of the cuffed femoral artery in the wild-type (Agtr2+, WT) and AT2 receptor null (Agtr2-, KO) mice. Cuffed arteries were harvested after perfusion fixation at 100 mmHg, postfixed, dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin. Sections of 5 µm thickness were stained by Elastica van Gieson staining. Magnification x100; bar = 0.1 mm. B: morphometric analysis of the cuffed femoral artery. Cross-sectional areas of the media and the neointima were measured at 7, 14, and 28 days after cuff placement. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 vs. Agtr2+; n = 7–10 for each group; values are means ± SE. C: bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) uptake in the media and the neointima of the cuffed femoral artery. BrdU index (BrdU-positive nuclei/total nuclei) was analyzed at 7, 14, and 28 days after cuff placement. *P < 0.05 vs. Agtr2+; n = 5–7 for each group; values are means ± SE.

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Effect of AT2 receptor antagonist, PD-123319, administration on neointima formation in cuffed femoral artery in the wild-type mice. Wild-type mice were treated with PD-123319 (20 mg/kg per day) or vehicle using Alzet micro-osmotic pumps implanted intraperitoneally at the time of cuff placement surgery. Cross-sectional areas of the media and the neointima were measured at 14 days after cuff placement. *P < 0.05 vs. vehicle-treated mice; n = 7 for vehicle-treated mice, and n = 6 for PD-123319-treated mice; values are means ± SE.

 

    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We first examined the mRNA expression of inflammatory cytokines, IFN-{gamma}, IL-1ß, IL-6, and TNF-{alpha} in the cuffed artery of the Agtr2+ mouse by RT-PCR. As shown in Fig. 1A, the expression of these cytokines was scarce or undetectable in the control intact artery, whereas the expression was induced markedly by cuff placement. The peak response was observed at 5–7 days after cuff placement. Next, we examined AT1 and AT2 receptor mRNA expression in the injured artery of the Agtr2+ mouse. As shown in Fig. 1B, AT1 receptor mRNA was upregulated in response to cuff placement. Also, AT2 receptor mRNA was stimulated markedly from the baseline undetectable level. The peak effect was observed at 5 days after cuff placement, then the expression declined gradually. Since we demonstrated that the cytokine-induced transcription factor IRF-1 transactivated AT2 receptor in R3T3 cells (14, 15), we examined IRF-1 expression in the blood vessel. Upregulation of IRF-1 coincided with AT2 receptor expression, suggesting the involvement of IRF-1 in AT2 receptor induction in this vascular disease model.

To localize the expression of AT1 receptor, AT2 receptor, and IRF-1, cuffed arteries at 7 days in the Agtr2+ mice were harvested and micro-dissected into two regions: the media/intima layers and the adventitial layer as shown in Fig. 2A. RT-PCR showed that AT1 and AT2 receptors were predominantly expressed in the media/intima layers, whereas IRF-1 was expressed in both regions. Immunohistochemistry using the antibody to AT2 receptor (Fig. 2, B–D) also demonstrated that AT2 receptor expression was mainly observed in the media and neointima and associated with {alpha}-smooth muscle actin but not with CD45, indicating that AT2 receptor was localized to VSMC, although possible endothelial expression of AT2 receptor could not be denied. No significant staining for AT2 receptor was observed in the intact artery (data not shown).

Based on these data, we hypothesized that the absence of AT2 receptor expression in response to inflammation in the Agtr2- mouse augmented neointima formation. We confirmed that AT2 receptor mRNA was not expressed in the Agtr2- mice, whereas AT1 receptor mRNA was comparably expressed in the Agtr2+ and Agtr2- mice at 7 and 14 days after cuff placement (Fig. 3). Figure 4A shows the representative cross sections of the cuffed femoral artery in the Agtr2+ and Agtr2- mice at 7, 14, and 28 days after cuff placement. Concentric neointima was formed and developed until up to 28 days. Both the media and the neointima were uniformly stained with anti-{alpha}-smooth muscle actin antibody, whereas the adventitia was not (Fig. 2C), indicating that the media and the neointima consisted primarily of VSMCs. We detected numerous CD45-positive cells in the adventitia at 1–7 days (Fig. 2D), documenting leukocyte infiltration. Neointima formation was exaggerated in the Agtr2- mouse compared with that in the Agtr2+ mouse, whereas the medial area did not change throughout the experimental period (Fig. 4B). Accordingly, there was no significant difference in the medial area between the Agtr2+ and Agtr2- mice. On the other hand, the neointimal area was 170–200% greater in the Agtr2- mouse than in the Agtr2+ mouse at 7, 14, and 28 days after cuff placement. The adventitial area did not differ between the Agtr2+ and Agtr2- mice (data not shown).

To evaluate the effect of AT2 receptor expression on vascular proliferation, we counted BrdU-positive cells and hematoxylin-positive cells. As shown in Fig. 4C, the BrdU index in the media was higher in the Agtr2- mouse than in the Agtr2+ mouse at 7 days, whereas no difference was observed at 14 days or 28 days. The BrdU index in the intima was also higher in the Agtr2- mouse than in the Agtr2+ mouse at 7 days and at 14 days, but no difference existed at 28 days after cuff placement.

We measured blood pressure and heart rate in the Agtr2+ and Agtr2- mice before and after cuff placement, since hemodynamic changes may influence neointima formation and the vasopressor response to ANG II is reported to be exaggerated in the Agtr2- mouse (11, 17). The intact mice showed comparable mean arterial pressure (Agtr2+, 107 ± 3 mmHg; Agtr2-, 106 ± 3 mmHg; n = 8) and heart rate (Agtr2+, 593 ± 22 bpm; Agtr2-, 607 ± 21 bpm). Moreover, cuff placement for 14 days did not affect these hemodynamic parameters. Thus there was no significant difference in mean arterial pressure (Agtr2+, 107 ± 4 mmHg; Agtr2-, 108 ± 2 mmHg; n = 7) or heart rate (Agtr2+, 606 ± 20 bpm; Agtr2-, 605 ± 25 bpm) between the two strains after cuff placement.

To further confirm that the AT2 receptor mediates the reduction in neointima formation, we infused the AT2 receptor blocker, PD-123319, into Agtr2+ mice for 14 days after cuff placement and examined vascular histomorphometry. As shown in Fig. 5, the neointimal area was increased by PD-123319 treatment, whereas the medial area or the adventitial area (data not shown) was not affected.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
This study demonstrates that placement of a nonconstricting cuff around the mouse femoral artery induces the expression of inflammatory cytokines and consequently IRF-1, which stimulates AT2 receptor expression in the VSMC. Furthermore, confirming the in vitro data demonstrating growth inhibitory action of the AT2 receptor, VSMC proliferation and neointimal lesion area were two-fold greater in the Agtr2- mouse than those in the Agtr2+ mouse.

In vitro cell culture studies suggest that AT2 receptor can exert growth inhibitory effects in AT2 receptor cDNA-transfected VSMCs (26), cultured rat endothelial cells (36), and neonatal cardiomyocytes (2). In addition, we have demonstrated that AT2 receptor exerts proapoptotic effects in PC12W cells (13, 44), R3T3 mouse fibroblasts (15), and AT2 receptor-transfected VSMCs (43), whereas the AT1 receptor stimulation inhibits apoptosis in VSMCs (29, 43). Using in vivo gene transfer into the balloon-injured rat carotid artery, we have demonstrated previously that overexpression of the AT2 receptor transgene inhibited the subsequent development of neointima (26). However, the role of the endogenous AT2 receptor in vascular remodeling remains to be defined. Previous studies using AT2 receptor blockers have yielded conflicting results (16, 18). The gene-targeted mouse provides a unique model in which AT2 receptor is knocked out and therefore is particularly useful in studying the role of the endogenous AT2 receptor in vascular remodeling. We chose the nonconstricting cuff model because it is very reproducible, whereas vascular injury induced by intraluminal balloon or wire in the mouse is quite variable. Furthermore, the cuff injury model stimulates an inflammatory reaction that appears to play an important role in mediating the formation of neointimal hyperplasia (12). Indeed, recent data have documented the pivotal role of inflammation in atherosclerosis and vascular diseases (23, 30, 31). In addition, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, perindopril, inhibited cuff-induced neointima formation in mice by ~60% (our unpublished results), suggesting the role of renin-angiotensin system in this cuff injury model. Thus cuff injury in the Agtr2- mouse would also provide us with the model to study the role of pathological inflammation in the regulation of AT2 receptor gene expression and signaling in vivo.

We have shown that IRF-1, which can be induced by inflammatory cytokines, transactivates AT2 receptor expression (14, 15). We have identified IRF binding motif (between -282 and -253) in the mouse AT2 receptor genomic DNA and demonstrated that the expression of AT2 receptor in R3T3 cells is transcriptionally regulated by the competitive binding of two related IRFs (IRF-1 and IRF-2) (14). These IRFs have been previously shown to recognize the same DNA sequence elements: the AAGTGA motif or G(A)AAAG/CT/CGAAAG/CT/C (8, 39). Competitive binding of IRF-1 and IRF-2 was reported to play critical roles in determining growth, transformation, and apoptosis of cells (9, 21, 38, 42). By antisense treatment, we have demonstrated that IRF-1 inhibition abolished the upregulation of AT2 receptor and attenuated ANG II-mediated apoptosis (15). We have examined the role of cytokine IFN-{gamma} on AT2 receptor expression in these cells and demonstrated that IFN-{gamma} induced IRF-1 expression and increased IRF binding to the AT2 receptor promoter region and consequently AT2 receptor upregulation (unpublished results). Taken together, these in vitro results suggest that cytokine-induced IRF-1 is very important for AT2 receptor expression.

To study the potential role of IRF-1 in vascular AT2 receptor in vivo, we examined the mRNA expressions of IRF-1 and AT2 receptor as well as the cytokines, IFN-{gamma}, IL-1ß, IL-6, and TNF-{alpha}. We demonstrated that at 5–7 days after cuff placement, the expressions of cytokines and IRF-1 were activated. AT2 receptor mRNA was upregulated concomitantly in the Agtr2+ but not in the Agtr2- mouse. Using regional dissection of the vessel and immunohistochemistry, we demonstrated that the cytokines and IRF-1 were detected throughout the vessel wall, whereas AT2 receptor was specifically expressed in the medial and neointimal cells that were costained with {alpha}-smooth muscle actin. These observations have led us to hypothesize that the vascular inflammatory reaction in response to pathological stimuli results in the release of cytokines such as IFN-{gamma} that stimulates paracrine IRF-1 expression. IRF-1 subsequently induces AT2 receptor upregulation in VSMC. This sequence of events enhances AT2 receptor-mediated antiproliferation of VSMC, leading to the modulation of neointima formation. Furthermore, the AT2 receptor expression may also mediate, at least in part, the apoptosis after vascular injury. However, our preliminary data failed to detect a difference between Agtr2+ and Agtr2- vessels at 7 days after cuff placement (data not shown).

To further confirm the physiological relevance of increased AT2 receptor in cuff-induced vascular disease model, we examined the effect of AT2 receptor antagonist administration and demonstrated that this treatment enhanced neointima formation in the Agtr2+ mouse. This result further supports the notion that the AT2 receptor plays a critical role in vascular remodeling in vivo.

The relevance of our findings in humans remains to be defined. Since inflammation appears to play pathological roles in human atherosclerosis and restenosis, it would be intriguing to study the status of AT2 receptor expression and its role in human vascular diseases.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We are indebted to Dr. Robert M. Carey, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, for the generous gift of the antibody to AT2 receptor.

This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grants HL-58516 and HL-61661 and by a grant from Longwood Foundation for Translational Research.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: V. J. Dzau, Dept. of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115 (E-mail: vdzau{at}rics.bwh.harvard.edu).


    FOOTNOTES
 
Article published online before print. See web site for date of publication (http://physiolgenomics.physiology.org).


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Akishita, M., Y. Ouchi, H. Miyoshi, K. Kozaki, S. Inoue, M. Ishikawa, M. Eto, K. Toba, and H. Orimo. Estrogen inhibits cuff-induced intimal thickening of rat femoral artery: effects on migration and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells. Atherosclerosis 130: 1–10, 1997.[ISI][Medline]
  2. Booz, G. W., and K. M. Baker. Role of type 1 and type 2 angiotensin receptors in angiotensin II-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. Hypertension 28: 635–640, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Dimmeler, S., V. Rippmann, U. Weiland, J. Haendeler, and A. M. Zeiher. Angiotensin II induces apoptosis of human endothelial cells. Protective effect of nitric oxide. Circ. Res. 81: 970–976, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Fransen, L., R. Muller, A. Marmenout, J. Tavernier, J. Van der Heyden, E. Kawashima, A. Chollet, R. Tizard, H. Van Heuverswyn, A. Van Vliet, M. R. Ruysschaert, and W. Fiers. Molecular cloning of mouse tumor necrosis factor cDNA and its eukaryotic expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 13: 4417–4429, 1985.[Abstract]
  5. Gray, P. W., D. Glaister, E. Chen, D. V. Goeddel, and D. Pennica. Two interleukin 1 genes in the mouse: cloning and expression of the cDNA for murine interleukin 1-ß. J. Immunol. 137: 3644–3648, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Gray, P. W., and D. V. Goeddel. Cloning and expression of murine immune interferon cDNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80: 5842–5846, 1983.[Abstract]
  7. Grenett, H. E., N. L. Fuentes, and G. M. Fuller. Cloning and sequence analysis of the cDNA for murine interleukin-6. Nucleic Acids Res. 18: 6455, 1990.[ISI][Medline]
  8. Harada, H., T. Fujita, M. Miyamoto, Y. Kimura, M. Maruyama, A. Furia, T. Miyata, and T. Taniguchi. Structurally similar but functionally distinct factors, IRF-1 and IRF-2, bind to the same regulatory elements of IFN and IFN-inducible genes. Cell 58: 729–739, 1998.
  9. Harada, H, M. Kitagawa, N. Tanaka, H. Yamamoto, K. Harada, M. Ishihara, and T. Taniguchi. Anti-oncogenic and oncogenic potentials of interferon regulatory factors-1 and -2. Science 259: 971–974, 1993.[ISI][Medline]
  10. Haunstetter, A., and S. Izumo. Apoptosis: basic mechanisms and implications for cardiovascular disease. Circ. Res. 82: 1111–1129, 1998.[Free Full Text]
  11. Hein, L., G. S. Barsh, R. E. Pratt, V. J. Dzau, and B. K. Kobilka. Behavioural and cardiovascular effects of disrupting the angiotensin II type-2 receptor gene in mice. Nature 377: 744–747, 1995.[ISI][Medline]
  12. Hirosumi, J., A. Nomoto, Y. Ohkubo, C. Sekiguchi, S. Mutoh, I. Yamaguchi, and H. Aoki. Inflammatory responses in cuff-induced atherosclerosis in rabbits. Atherosclerosis 64: 243–254, 1987.[ISI][Medline]
  13. Horiuchi, M., W. Hayashida, T. Kambe, T. Yamada, and V. J. Dzau. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor dephosphorylates Bcl-2 by activating mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase-1 and induces apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 19022–19026, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Horiuchi, M., G. Koike, T. Yamada, M. Mukoyama, M. Nakajima, and V. J. Dzau. The growth dependent expression of angiotensin II type 2 receptor is regulated by transcription factors interferon regulatory factor-1 and -2. J. Biol. Chem. 270: 20225–20230, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Horiuchi, M., T. Yamada, W. Hayashida, and V. J. Dzau. Interferon regulatory factor-1 upregulates angiotensin type 2 receptor and induces apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 11952–11958, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Huckle, W. R., M. D. Drag, W. R. Acker, M. Powers, R. C. McFall, D. J. Holder, T. Fujita, I. I. Stabilito, D. Kim, D. L. Ondeyka, N. B. Mantlo, R. S. Chang, C. F. Reilly, R. S. Schwartz, W. J. Greenlee, and R. G. Johnson, Jr. Effects of subtype-selective and balanced angiotensin II receptor antagonists in a porcine coronary artery model of vascular restenosis. Circulation 93: 1009–1019, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Ichiki, T., P. A. Labosky, C. Shiota, S. Okuyama, Y. Imagawa, A. Fogo, F. Niimura, I. Ichikawa, B. L. Hogan, and T. Inagami. Effects on blood pressure and exploratory behaviour of mice lacking angiotensin II type-2 receptor. Nature 377: 748–750, 1995.[ISI][Medline]
  18. Janiak, P., A. Pillon, J. F. Prost, and J. P. Vilaine. Role of angiotensin subtype 2 receptor in neointima formation after vascular injury. Hypertension 20: 737–745, 1992.[Abstract]
  19. Kambayashi, Y., S. Bardhan, K. Takahashi, S. Tsuzuki, H. Inui, T. Hamakubo, and T. Inagami. Molecular cloning of a novel angiotensin II receptor isoform involved in phosphotyrosine phosphatase inhibition. J. Biol. Chem. 268: 24543–24546, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Kamijo, R., H. Harada, T. Matsuyama, M. Bosland, J. Gerecitano, D. Shapiro, J. Le, S. I. Koh, T. Kimura, S. J. Green, T. W. Mak, T. Taniguchi, and J. Vilcek. Requirement for transcription factor IRF-1 in NO synthase induction in macrophages. Science 263: 1612–1615, 1994.[ISI][Medline]
  21. Kirchhoff, S., F. Schaper, and H. Hauser. Interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF-1) mediates cell growth inhibition by transactivation of downstream target genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 21: 2881–2889, 1993.[Abstract]
  22. Laflamme, L., M. Gasparo, J. M. Gallo, M. D. Payet, and N. Gallo-Payet. Angiotensin II induction of neurite outgrowth by AT2 receptors in NG108–15 cells. Effect counteracted by the AT1 receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 22729–22735, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Mach, F., U. Schönbeck, G. K. Sukhova, E. Atkinson, and P. Libby. Reduction of atherosclerosis in mice by inhibition of CD40 signalling. Nature 394: 200–203, 1998.[ISI][Medline]
  24. Meffert, S., M. Stoll, U. M. Steckelings, S. P. Bottari, and T. Unger. The angiotensin II AT2 receptor inhibits proliferation and promotes differentiation in PC12W cells. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 122: 59–67, 1996.[ISI][Medline]
  25. Mukoyama, M., M. Nakajima, M. Horiuchi, H. Sasamura, R. E. Pratt, and V. J. Dzau. Expression cloning of type 2 angiotensin II receptor reveals a unique class of seven-transmembrane receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 268: 24539–24542, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Nakajima, M., H. Hutchinson, M. Fujinaga, W. Hayashida, R. Morishita, L. Zhang, M. Horiuchi, R. E. Pratt, and V. J. Dzau. The angiotensin II type 2 (AT2) receptor antagonizes the growth effects of the AT1 receptor: gain of function study using in vivo gene transfer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 10663–10667, 1995.[Abstract]
  27. Nakajima, M., M. Mukoyama, R. E. Pratt, M. Horiuchi, and V. J. Dzau. Cloning of cDNA and analysis of the gene for mouse angiotensin type 2 receptor. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 197: 393–399, 1993.[ISI][Medline]
  28. Ozono, R., Z. Q. Wang, A. F. Moore, T. Inagami, H. M. Siragy, and R. M. Carey. Expression of the subtype 2 angiotensin (AT2) receptor protein in rat kidney. Hypertension 30: 1238–1246, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Pollman, M. J., T. Yamada, M. Horiuchi, and G. H. Gibbons. Vasoactive substances regulate smooth muscle cell apoptosis: counteracting influences of nitric oxide and angiotensin II. Circ. Res. 179: 748–756, 1996.
  30. Ridker, P. M., M. Cushman, M. J. Stampfer, R. P. Tracy, and C. H. Hennekens. Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men. N. Engl. J. Med. 336: 973–979, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Ridker, P. M., C. H. Hennekens, B. Roitman-Johnson, M. J. Stampfer, and J. Allen. Plasma concentration of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 and risks of future myocardial infarction in apparently healthy men. Lancet 351: 88–92, 1998.[ISI][Medline]
  32. Sabath, D. E., H. E. Broome, and M. B. Prystowsky. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA is a major interleukin 2-induced transcript in a cloned T-helper lymphocyte. Gene 91: 185–191, 1990.[ISI][Medline]
  33. Sasamura, H., L. Hein, J. E. Krieger, R. E. Pratt, B. K. Kobilka, and V. J. Dzau. Cloning, characterization, and expression of two angiotensin receptor (AT1) isoforms from the mouse genome. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 185: 253–259, 1992.[ISI][Medline]
  34. Shanmugam, S., P. Corvol, and J. M. Gasc. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor mRNA expression in the developing cardiopulmonary system of the rat. Hypertension 28: 91–97, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Spink, J., and T. Evans. Binding of the transcription factor interferon regulatory factor-1 to the inducible nitric-oxide synthase promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 24417–24425, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Stoll, M., M. Steckelings, M. Paul, S. P. Bottari, R. Metzger, and T. Unger. The angiotensin AT2-receptor mediates inhibition of cell proliferation in coronary endothelial cells. J. Clin. Invest. 95: 651–657, 1995.[ISI][Medline]
  37. Tamura, T., M. Ishihara, M. S. Lamphier, N. Tanaka, I. Oishi, S. Aizawa, T. Matsuyama, T. W. Mak, S. Taki, and T. Taniguchi. An IRF-1-dependent pathway of DNA damage-induced apoptosis in mitogen-activated T lymphocytes. Nature 376: 596–599, 1995.[ISI][Medline]
  38. Tanaka, N., M. Ishihara, M. Kitagawa, H. Harada, T. Kimura, T. Matsuyama, M. S. Lamphier, S. Aizawa, T. W. Mak, and T. Taniguchi. Cellular commitment to oncogene induced transformation or apoptosis is dependent on the transcription factor IRF-1. Cell 77: 829–839, 1994.[ISI][Medline]
  39. Tanaka, N., T. Kawakami, and T. Taniguchi. Recognition DNA sequences of interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF-1) and IRF-2, regulators of cell growth and the interferon system. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13: 4531–4538, 1993.[Abstract]
  40. Tilly, J. L., and A. J. Hsueh. Microscale autoradiographic method for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of apoptotic DNA fragmentation. J. Cell. Physiol. 154: 519–526, 1993.[ISI][Medline]
  41. Viswanathan, M., K. Tsutsumi, F. M. Correa, and J. M. Saavedra. Changes in expression of angiotensin receptor subtypes in the rat aorta during development. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 179: 1361–1367, 1991.[ISI][Medline]
  42. Yamada, G., M. Ogawa, K. Akagi, H. Miyamoto, N. Nakano, S. Itoh, J. Miyazaki, S. Nishikawa, K. Yamamura, and T. Taniguchi. Specific depletion of the B-cell population induced by aberrant expression of human interferon regulatory factor 1 gene in transgenic mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 532–536, 1991.[Abstract]
  43. Yamada, T., M. Akishita, M. J. Pollman, G. H. Gibbons, V. J. Dzau, and M. Horiuchi. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor mediates vascular smooth muscle cell apoptosis and antagonizes angiotensin II type 1 receptor action: an in vitro gene transfer study. Life Sci. 63: 289–295, 1998.
  44. Yamada, T., M. Horiuchi, and V. J. Dzau. The novel angiotensin II type 2 receptor mediates programmed cell death. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 156–160, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]