Insights into the physiological role of WT1 from studies of genetically modified mice
Maria Teresa Discenza1 and
Jerry Pelletier1,2
1 Department of Biochemistry
2 McGill Cancer Center, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1Y6, Canada
 |
ABSTRACT
|
---|
Discenza, Maria Teresa, and Jerry Pelletier. Insights into the physiological role of WT1 from studies of genetically modified mice. Physiol Genomics 16: 287-300, 2004; 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00164.2003.The identification of WT1 gene mutations in children with WAGR and Denys-Drash syndromes pointed toward a role for WT1 in genitourinary system development. Biochemical analysis of the different WT1 protein isoforms showed that WT1 is a transcription factor and also has the ability to bind RNA. Analysis of WT1 complexes identified several target genes and protein partners capable of interacting with WT1. Some of these studies placed WT1, its downstream targets, and protein partners in a transcriptional regulatory network that controls urogenital system development. We review herein studies on WT1 knockout and transgenic models that have been instrumental in defining a physiological role for WT1 in normal and abnormal urogenital development.
kidney development; mouse models
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
---|
WILMS TUMOR (WT), a pediatric kidney cancer, has been the subject of intense clinical and basic research for several years. The implication of the Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) tumor suppressor gene in the etiology of WT illustrated the impact that genetic alterations can have on both development and tumorigenesis. Biochemical studies of the WT1 gene and gene product, as well as the study of patients and genetically modified mice with mutations in WT1 have all contributed in defining a role for WT1 during development.
 |
The WT1 Gene, mRNA Transcripts, and Protein Isoforms
|
---|
The WT1 gene is located at human chromosome position 11p13 (Fig. 1) and on mouse chromosome 2. Both the mouse and human genes span
50 kb of genomic DNA comprising 10 exons that encode mRNAs of
3 kb (16, 37, 38). A map of the WT1 gene structure is shown in Fig. 2.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of the genomic organization of WT1 (A) and of the WT1 protein (B). WT1 is encoded by 10 exons. Exons 7, 8, 9, and 10 encode WT1 zinc fingers I, II, III, and IV, respectively. The WT1 zinc finger domain is involved in both DNA and RNA binding and harbors multiple nuclear localization signals (NLS). Alternatively spliced sequences are represented by open boxes. Alternative splicing of exon 5 and alternative usage of two different splice donor sites at the 3' end of exon 9 produce different WT1 isoforms. The three translation initiation sites that have been identified are indicated in exon 1. The TGA translational stop codon is indicated. The three different amino-terminal domains produced by alternative translation start site usage are represented by different shades of gray. An RNA editing event, which alters the amino acid at position 280 from Leu to Pro, is indicated on the WT1 protein as well as the boundaries for the transcription regulation domains and the self-association domain.
|
|
WT1 exon 5 and exon 9 are alternatively spliced (37, 47). Inclusion of exon 5 inserts 17 amino acids between the NH2- and COOH-terminal domains of WT1 (Fig. 2). The WT1 gene encodes a protein with typical characteristics of a transcription factor (Fig. 2). The NH2-terminal domain of WT1 is proline- and glutamine-rich. The COOH-terminal domain of WT1 contains four zinc fingers, each one encoded by an exon, encompassing exons 7 to 10. The zinc fingers are of the Cys2-His2 variety, similar to the DNA-binding domain of the Drosophila Krüppel protein. Two nuclear localization signals have been identified in the zinc finger domain of WT1, one being in zinc finger 1 and the other in zinc fingers 2 and 3 (13). The use of an alternative splice donor site at the end of exon 9 results in the incorporation of three amino acids, lysine, threonine, and serine (KTS), between zinc fingers three and four (Fig. 2). The WT1 proteins have molecular masses of 5254 kDa depending on the inclusion or exclusion of the two splice inserts (93). The 52-kDa protein corresponds to the WT1 isoform that lacks both alternatively spliced sequences, named WT1(-/-), and the 54-kDa protein corresponds to the WT1 isoform that contains both alternatively spliced sequences, named WT1(+/+). The WT1 isoform containing the exon 5 splice insert, but lacking the KTS insert, is named WT1(+/-), and conversely, the WT1 isoform lacking the exon 5 insert but containing the KTS insert is named WT1(-/+). Much work has been done in studying the effect of the KTS splice insert on DNA-binding and functional properties of WT1 where the presence or absence of the 17 amino acid exon 5 splice insert is of little consequence to its function. In these cases, WT1 protein isoforms are simply referred to as WT1(+KTS) and WT1(-KTS) to reflect the presence or absence of the KTS splice insert, respectively. Similarly, WT1 isoforms are often referred to as WT1(+exon 5) and WT1(-exon 5) to reflect the presence or absence of the of exon 5 splice insert.
Three translation initiation sites have been identified in the WT1 mRNA (Fig. 2). The four WT1 protein isoforms described above of molecular masses between 52 and 54 kDa are generated through the use of the major initiator AUG. Larger WT1 protein isoforms have been identified that are generated by translation initiation at an in-frame CUG codon upstream of the initiator AUG and results in WT1 protein isoforms of 6062 kDa (14). Internal translation initiation at an in-frame AUG codon downstream of the initiator AUG generates smaller WT1 protein isoforms with molecular masses of 3638 kDa (117).
The diversity of WT1 protein isoforms is further increased by an RNA editing event, detected in adult rat kidney and human testis, at nucleotide 839 of the WT1 mRNA that replaces leucine-280 in the WT1 protein by a proline (Fig. 2) (121). Therefore, taking into account all possible modifications, at least 24 different WT1 protein isoforms would be expected to be generated.
 |
Wilms Tumor
|
---|
WT is a nephroblastoma that occurs with a frequency of
1 in 10,000 births (81). The tumor is embryonic in origin, it is detected in children usually during the first 5 years of life and can occur unilaterally or bilaterally. A WT arises when condensed metanephric mesenchymal cells of the developing kidney fail to properly differentiate (76). When these cells persist in their undifferentiated state, they form a nephrogenic rest (8, 18). The majority of nephrogenic rests become dormant or regressing rests, and only a minority proliferate to become hyperplastic rests. A rest that undergoes genetic or epigenetic changes to become a neoplastic rest will consequently proliferate further to produce a benign lesion (adenomatous rest) or a malignant WT (reviewed in Refs. 10, 26). WTs often have triphasic histology in which areas of blastema, epithelia, and stroma can be observed. This pattern is suggestive that mesenchymal cells had already started to respond to the inductive signals that initiate nephrogenesis to produce a partial pattern of differentiation (9). Variants of WTs also occur in which one cell type predominates, such as blastema or stroma. The clinical treatment of WT involves surgical resection of the tumor or the affected kidney, which may be followed by chemotherapy and sometimes radiation therapy. Children are cured in
85% of cases (42). Anaplastic WTs (containing abnormal nuclear morphological features), however, are a subtype of tumors (<5%) displaying poor prognosis with many remaining refractory to treatment. This variant has been linked to a higher frequency of p53 mutations (5, 6).
 |
WT Genetics
|
---|
Most WTs are unilateral and are thought to arise from sporadic, somatic mutations. Ten to fifteen percent of sporadic WTs are caused by inactivating mutations of the WT1 tumor suppressor gene (20, 21, 46, 75, 127). WT1 mutations represent an early event in the etiology of WT as they have been found in nephrogenic rests (100). In the remaining cases of sporadic WT, the WT1 gene is not mutated and is expressed at high levels. It is believed that these tumors have a predisposing mutation in a gene functioning either upstream or downstream of WT1 or in another cellular pathway leading to hyperproliferation of nephrogenic rests. Genetic predisposition to Wilms tumorigenesis usually results in bilateral and/or multifocal disease and occurs in 510% of WT cases (42). Predisposition to WT is often found in association with one of four syndromes. These syndromes are WAGR, Denys-Drash, Beckwith-Wiedemann, and Frasier. Their characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The WT1 gene has been documented to be mutated in WAGR, Denys-Drash, and Frasier syndromes (4, 12, 65, 103, 104).
 |
WT Associated Syndromes Involving Mutations in WT1
|
---|
WAGR syndrome.
Children suffering from WAGR syndrome present with WT, aniridia (hypoplasia of the iris), genitourinary malformations (hypospadia, cryptochidism, horseshoe kidneys, renal hypoplasia) and mental retardation (106). The genes responsible for WT and aniridia in children with WAGR syndrome were identified by fine mapping analysis of cytogenetic deletions in chromosome 11p13 (Fig. 1A; Table 1) (16, 38, 125). Hemizygous deletion of the Pax 6 gene is responsible for aniridia associated with WAGR, whereas hemizygous deletion of the WT1 gene is associated with the genitourinary system malformations of this syndrome and with predisposition to the development of WT (2, 11, 16, 38, 53, 56, 104, 125).
Denys-Drash syndrome.
Denys-Drash syndrome (DDS) is another disease of the genitourinary system with predisposition to WT (Table 1) (24, 28). The genitourinary system malformations presented by children with DDS are much more severe than those presented by children with WAGR, and the incidence of WT is higher. The severity of genital abnormalities observed in DDS varies and can include severe sexual ambiguity. Internal Müllerian duct structures are sometimes found in males (41, 80), and in several cases, individuals with grossly normal external and internal female genitalia have gonads containing only testicular tissue. Thus a wide range of reproductive tract abnormalities are observed.
The glomerular nephropathy, caused by diffuse mesangial sclerosis (DMS), is the most consistent feature of DDS and leads to end-stage renal disease (48, 58). The glomerular capillary tuft is surrounded by a layer of glomerular extracellular matrix (ECM), which in turn is surrounded by a visceral epithelial layer consisting of podocyte cells. The glomerular ECM consists of two regions, the glomerular basement membrane and the glomerular mesangial matrix. The mesangial cells secrete the mesangial matrix and are in direct contact with the arteries of the glomerular capillary tuft. In DMS, all mesangial cells in all the glomeruli of the kidney produce and secrete excess fibrotic material leading to a massive accumulation of ECM surrounding the capillary tuft. This causes the arteries in the capillary tuft to collapse, subsequently resulting in hypertension. Furthermore, the podocyte cells are often underdeveloped in children with DDS.
Children with DDS contain a germ line mutant allele of the WT1 gene, and analysis of WTs from three DDS patients indicated somatic loss of heterozygosity at the second wild-type WT1 locus (103). In 1991, Pelletier et al. (103) investigated 12 children with DDS and observed that each of the 12 children had inherited missense mutations in the zinc finger region of the WT1 gene. Furthermore, it was observed that 8 of the 12 patients had exactly the same mutation. This mutation consists of an arginine to tryptophan (R to W) change at residue 394 WT1 zinc finger III and is sufficient to abrogate DNA binding by the WT1 protein to a high-affinity DNA binding site (Fig. 1B) (103). Other point mutations occurring in the zinc-finger region of the WT1 gene which interfere with DNA binding by WT1 have also been identified in children with DDS (Fig. 1B) (3, 12, 116). Several laboratories showed that WT1 can self-associate through its NH2-terminal domain and subsequently analyzed the effect of WT1 association with a DDS mutant WT1 (33, 90, 112). The data indicated that association of wild-type WT1 with DDS mutant WT1 resulted in an inhibition of WT1 transcriptional activity and in an alteration of the subnuclear localization of wild-type WT1. This suggests that mutant DDS proteins may act in a dominant-negative fashion and disrupt the function of the wild-type WT1 protein in DDS. The more severe phenotype observed in individuals with DDS compared with WAGR individuals may, therefore, be explained by a higher functional loss in WT1 activity in DDS. It remains possible, however, that the product of the DDS WT1 allele may disrupt normal genitourinary developmental pathways by dominantly interacting with other proteins.
Frasier syndrome.
Frasier syndrome is a rare disorder characterized by male pseudohermaphroditism (involving an XY karyotype, female external genitalia and streak gonads), glomerulopathy (involving focal segmental glomerulosclerosis where only some glomeruli are affected, and within those glomeruli, only certain segments of the capillary tuft are affected), and the development of genitourinary tumors (gonadoblastoma, and to a lesser extent, WT) (Table 1) (35, 50, 64). Frasier syndrome is associated with a point mutation in the intron 9 donor splice site of one WT1 allele, resulting in the loss of expression of the WT1(+KTS) isoform from that allele (Fig. 1C) (4, 65). Therefore, a change in ratio of the +KTS to -KTS isoforms is responsible for the developmental defects observed in Frasier syndrome. The different WT1 isoforms may have overlapping but not necessarily identical functions, and therefore the loss or reduction of one isoform could not be fully compensated for by the activity of one of the other isoforms.
 |
Expression Pattern of the WT1 Gene
|
---|
The association of genitourinary system malformations in humans with germ line mutations in the WT1 gene indicates that WT1 is a key regulatory factor controlling development of the genitourinary system. To be able to assess the relevance of mouse models harboring WT1 lesions, it is important to analyze the role that WT1 plays in normal physiology and development.
WT1 expression pattern during kidney development.
Studies using in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry have shown that WT1 is expressed during all three stages of mammalian kidney development (1, 15, 94, 105, 108, 109). The earliest expression of WT1 in the mouse kidney has been reported at embryonic day 9 (E9) (1, 109). At this stage, WT1 is expressed over the urogenital ridge, in the degenerating pronephroi and in the mesonephroi. In particular, WT1 is expressed in the early vesicle stage of the mesonephroi and in the glomerular podocyte cells of the mesonephroi. In human embryos, the earliest time point at which WT1 expression has been analyzed is at around week 7 of gestation (94, 108). Similar to the mouse embryo, WT1 expression is also detected in the glomerular podocyte cells of the mesonephroi.
Metanephric kidney development commences at around E11.5 in the mouse (E36E37 in humans). Just prior to this (mouse E11, human E34E35), there are low levels of WT1 expression in the loose, uninduced metanephric mesenchyme. As the ureteric bud emerges from the nephric duct (mouse E11.5, human E36E37), the metanephric mesenchyme condenses around the tip of the bud and begins to strongly express WT1. During nephrogenesis, WT1 expression remains high in the renal vesicles and comma-shaped bodies. At the S-shaped body stage, WT1 expression is turned off in all cells except those cells destined to become the podocyte cells of the glomeruli. In the adult kidney, WT1 expression remains high in the podocyte cells of the glomeruli.
WT1 expression pattern during gonad development.
In mammals, both the kidneys and the gonads are derived from the urogenital ridge (39). As mentioned previously, WT1 is expressed in the urogenital ridge early on in urogenital system development (55, 94, 105, 108, 109). In particular, WT1 is expressed in the sex cords of the genital ridge portion of the urogenital ridge, which gives rise to the gonads. WT1 is expressed in the mesenchymal compartments of the developing male and female gonads (1, 55, 94, 105, 108, 109). In the adult, WT1 expression is restricted to the Sertoli cells of the testes and the epithelial and granulosa cells of the ovary. WT1 is also expressed in the uterus (embryonic and adult), the oviduct, and endometrium of the female (105).
Other sites of WT1 expression.
Apart from the developing kidney and gonad, WT1 is also expressed during development of the spleen and the mesothelium (a lining of cells surrounding organs in the thoracic and abdominal cavities) (1, 94, 105, 108, 109). Common features of these tissues are that they are all mesodermal in origin and that they experience a switch from mesenchymal to epithelial cells at the time of WT1 expression. These same studies have also shown that WT1 is expressed in the liver, the thymus, certain areas of the brain and spinal cord, and in the abdominal wall musculature. Other studies have shown that WT1 is expressed in stem cells of the bone marrow (36), during development of the retina (128), and in the proliferating coelomic epithelium, the developing diaphragm and limb, the septum transversum, the early proepicardium, the epicardium, and the subepicardial mesenchyme (91, 92).
 |
Expression Ratios and Patterns of WT1 +/-KTS and WT1 +/-exon 5 Splice Isoforms
|
---|
Haber et al. (47) were the first to describe WT1 alternative splicing. Using the RNase protection assay (RPA), the authors quantitated the four WT1 splice isoforms and reported that the ratio of all four isoforms does not vary temporally and spatially during normal kidney development and is 8.3:2.5:3.8:1 for WT1(+/+):WT1(+/-):WT1(-/+):WT1(-/-) (47). This corresponds to ratios of 2.25:1 for the +/-exon 5 isoforms and 3.5:1 for the +/-KTS splice isoforms. The data presented in this publication, however, is difficult to interpret given the presence of multiple protected bands obtained due to the use of a long RPA probe. Subsequent studies have further examined the expression of the four WT1 splice isoforms during kidney development and in different species. Expression data from these publications, obtained from reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and RPA assays, are consistent with each other but do not corroborate the expression ratios obtained by Haber et al. (47).
The WT1 KTS splice isoform is found in species from all gnathostome classes (61). Furthermore, data shows that the +/-KTS splice isoform ratio does not vary during development of the kidney and that interspecies differences are not evident (49, 113). The +/-KTS ratio is in the range of 1.11.5:1 (49, 113).
Unlike the WT1 KTS splice isoform, the WT1 exon 5 splice isoform is only expressed in mammals (61). Analysis of WT1 isoform expression in human, mouse, and rat tissue has shown that there are differences in exon 5 splicing during kidney development, as well as species-specific differences in the expression of WT1 +/-exon 5 splice isoforms. RT-PCR analysis of human and mouse normal tissue, as well as human tumor tissue, showed differences in exon 5 splicing during human kidney development (113). All four WT1 splice isoforms were expressed equally in human fetal kidney, whereas human adult kidney expressed approximately twofold excess of exon 5 containing isoforms. In the same study, RT-PCR analysis of WT1 splice isoforms in WTs generally reflected the ratios seen in fetal kidneys. Work done by Iben et al. (57) confirmed the above results through the analysis of native WT1 protein in human kidney and WT samples. Mouse tissue, however, showed a relative lack of exon 5-containing transcripts. Other studies have also shown a lack of WT1 exon 5 transcripts in mouse tissue, including mouse ovarian and oviduct tissue (66), mouse uterine tissue (113), and mouse testis (61). Analysis of rat tissue, however, has shown that the uterine stroma expresses predominantly the WT1 exon 5 isoform and that, similar to humans, rat testes express an excess of exon 5-containing transcripts to a ratio of 4:1 (61, 113). Given the differences in expression patterns and ratios of the WT1 exon 5 splice isoforms between humans and rodents, the interpretation of WT1 function from phenotypic abnormalities of mouse models showing alterations in exon 5 isoform expression may not be extendable to the situation during human development.
 |
DNA Binding and Transcriptional Regulation by WT1
|
---|
To identify WT1 target genes, many studies first identified WT1 interacting sequences by using binding site selection experiments with oligonucleotides, whole genomic PCR, and DNase I footprint analysis (reviewed in Ref. 85). In general, WT1(-KTS) binds to GC-rich sequences, such as the Egr-1-like consensus sequence, 5' GCGGGGGCG 3' (110), and the WTE site, 5' GCGTGGGAGT 3' (96), or to sites containing (5'TCC3')n motifs (132).
The WT1 protein contains domains that, when fused to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain, can function independently to repress or activate transcription. A repression domain has been identified in amino acids 85124, and an activation domain has been identified in amino acids 181250 (133) (Fig. 2). Similarly, fusion of the 17 amino acids of the first alternatively spliced exon (exon 5) to GAL4 shows that this region is capable of repressing transcription (134), suggesting that this alternative splicing event functions to modify the transcriptional regulatory properties of WT1. The mechanism of WT1-mediated transcriptional repression has been analyzed via cotransfection assays and transcriptional run-on experiments to test the ability of WT1 to repress different classes of activation domains previously shown to stimulate the initiation and elongation steps of RNA polymerase II transcription (72). In these assays, it was revealed that WT1 represses all three classes of activation domains: those that stimulate initiation, elongation, and both initiation and elongation.
Transfection assays using reporter gene constructs and WT1 expression vectors also show that WT1 is able to activate and repress different target genes. WT1 has been shown to regulate the expression of several classes of genes, including growth factors, growth factor receptors, transcription factors, extracellular or secreted proteins, as well as others (reviewed in Ref. 119). Many of these WT1 downstream target genes have been validated only in transient cotransfection assays, where the effects of chromatin and other interacting proteins are not as they would be in a more native experimental setting. Also, interpretation of the transcriptional regulatory properties of WT1 from the results of transient cotransfection assays can be biased by technical aspects of how the experiments were performed. In these studies, WT1 may activate or repress transcription depending on which expression vector is used to synthesize WT1, the architecture of the promoter regulating the expression of the reporter gene, and the cells lines used in the experiments (reviewed in Ref. 85). Several studies have examined endogenous, differential gene expression in cell lines inducible for WT1 expression or in cell lines constitutively expressing ectopic WT1 compared with cell lines lacking WT1. The use of microarray analysis, Northern blotting, Western blotting, and suppression subtractive hybridization PCR (44) has identified several genes whose endogenous expression is altered upon expression of WT1, including the epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) (32), the epidermal growth factor family member amphiregulin (70), the orphan nuclear receptor gene Dax-1 (63), podocalyxin, a major structural membrane protein of glomerular podocytes (99), the gene encoding the retinoblastoma (Rb) associated protein RbAp46 (44), and the receptor tyrosine kinase regulator Sprouty1 (43). The expression of the above-mentioned genes was also shown to correlate with WT1 expression in the kidney and/or gonad.
 |
Posttranscriptional Regulation by WT1
|
---|
It is speculated that WT1 is also involved in posttranscriptional regulatory pathways due to its ability to bind RNA and to its association with members of the splicing machinery. WT1 has been shown to bind to the murine IGF-II mRNA transcript via its zinc finger region, where WT1(+KTS) binds with greater affinity than WT1(-KTS) (17). A biological role for WT1 in the posttranscriptional regulation of IGF-II, however, has not been demonstrated. Using an RNA selection method to identify WT1 binding ligands from a random RNA pool, three groups of RNA ligands specifically recognized by WT1 were identified (7). This study showed that WT1 zinc fingers II to IV are necessary and sufficient for RNA binding.
Several pieces of data suggest a role for WT1 in splicing. WT1 has a distinct subnuclear expression pattern, where WT1(+KTS) isoforms preferentially colocalize with molecules implicated in mRNA splicing to characteristic nuclear "speckles," whereas WT1(-KTS) appears to be expressed diffusely throughout the nucleoplasm (69). Larsson et al. (69) also showed that WT1 coimmunoprecipitates with proteins of the splicing apparatus. Furthermore, WT1 has been shown to copurify with nuclear poly(A)+ ribonucleoprotein (68), to directly associate with the constitutive splicing protein U2AF65, and to become incorporated into spliceosomes in an in vitro splicing assay (22). These data suggest that WT1 is involved in posttranscriptional processing of RNA, but a functional involvement of WT1 in splicing has never been demonstrated. Indeed, in vitro experiments aimed at demonstrating a direct role for WT1 in splicing using HeLa cell nuclear extracts have failed to do so (J. Pelletier, unpublished data).
 |
WT1 Protein Partners
|
---|
In addition to the documented association with splicing factors, WT1 has been shown to interact with a number of additional proteins, many of which are also transcription factors and modulate WT1 activity. Table 2 provides an overview of the proteins identified by various protein-protein interaction assays as being interacting partners of WT1. The characterization of WT1 protein partners may lead to the identification of important pathways involved in cellular proliferation and differentiation. The following is a brief description of the implications of WT1 interactions with Par-4 and BMZF2. Discussion of WT1s interaction with p53 and Pax2 is presented in a later section of this review.
Par-4 (for "prostate apoptosis response-4"), a protein involved in the pro-apoptotic response of prostate cancer cells, binds to the zinc finger region of WT1 (59). Cotransfection of WT1 and Par-4 resulted in suppression of the growth-inhibitory activity of WT1, correlated with inhibition of WT1 transactivation and stimulated WT1-mediated repression. Other studies have shown that Par-4 interacts with the 17-amino acid alternatively spliced exon of WT1 (114). When fused to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain, this 17-amino acid region acts as an autonomous transcription activation domain whose activity is dependent on association with Par-4.
Bone marrow zinc finger 2 (BMZF2) is a potential transcription factor with 18 zinc fingers, where zinc fingers VIX are involved in protein-protein interactions with the zinc finger region of WT1 (71). Cotransfection of WT1 and BMZF2 results in inhibition of transcriptional activation by WT1. BMZF2 protein is nuclear and has been shown to be expressed predominantly in fetal tissues (71). Furthermore, fusion of BMZF2 to the GAL4-DNA binding domain revealed the presence of an active repressor domain within BMZF2. BMZF2 may potentially interfere with the transcriptional regulatory functions of WT1.
 |
Mouse Models Involving the WT1 Gene
|
---|
Biochemical analyses of the WT1 gene product have been useful in studying DNA binding, protein-protein interactions, and the transcriptional activity of the different WT1 isoforms. From these data, much insight was gained into how the different WT1 isoforms function in the cell. Organogenesis, however, is a complex process involving the interplay of many different factors and cross talk between several tissues and cell lineages. Given that these processes can only be studied in the context of developing animals, gene disruption in the mouse is an invaluable tool with which to study the physiological properties of WT1. The generation of mouse models harboring mutant WT1 alleles has supported the idea that WT1 is a key regulator of urogenital system development. These mouse models have allowed for a more thorough investigation of WT1 expression patterns, elucidation of details concerning the regulation of WT1 gene expression, and insights into the role played by WT1 during urogenital system development. A summary describing these mouse models is presented in Supplementary Table 3 (available at the Physiological Genomics web site).1
 |
The SeyDey Mouse
|
---|
The Dickie small-eye (SeyDey) allele in mice is an interstitial deletion on chromosome 2 encompassing the WT1 and Pax6 genes (40). This mutation is comparable to the gross cytogenetic deletions identified at human chromosome 11p13 in children with WAGR syndrome. Individuals with WAGR and SeyDey/+ mice have similarly malformed eyes (40). Renal neoplasms, however, have not been detected in SeyDey/+ mice, and their kidneys appear histologically normal. Furthermore, the developmental anomalies observed in the gonads, genitalia, and mesonephric structures of WAGR patients are not present in SeyDey/+ mice. This suggests that the fundamental events that regulate urogenital system development in mice may be less sensitive to WT1 gene dosage. Although not fully understood, the failure of SeyDey/+ mice to develop WTs may relate to the fact that mouse kidneys represent a smaller or more short-lived target cell population than human kidneys. Mouse kidneys are
100-fold smaller than human kidneys and development occurs over a period of 31 wk in humans compared with 21 days in mice. Therefore, this decreases the opportunity for the occurrence of postzygotic mutations during differentiation of the metanephric blastema. Additionally, there are (at least) two tumor suppressor genes configured on the same chromosome (11p13 and 11p15) in humans, whereas in mice, these two loci are on separate chromosomes (chromosome 2 and 7). Thus, in humans, reduction to hemizygosity for these two loci can be achieved by a single genetic lesion, whereas two independent events would be required in mice.
 |
The WT1 Null Mouse
|
---|
To improve our understanding of the role for WT1 in urogenital development, and to elucidate putative functions in other developmental processes, mice were generated carrying a targeted mutation of WT1 (67). Initially, C57BL/6 heterozygous mutant mice analyzed up to 10 mo of age were reported to appear normal and did not develop tumors (67). In a more recent study of the same WT1 heterozygotes, but bred on a mixed genetic background, analysis of the mutant mice up to 400 days after birth revealed that 40% of the mice died within this period, where the majority of them developed severe diffuse glomerulosclerosis (Supplementary Table 3) (86). Furthermore, glomerulosclerosis was accompanied by severe albuminuria and the loss of nephrin, CD2AP,
-actinin-4, and WT1 expression (86).
Homozygous mutant mice did not complete gestation, and induction of the metanephros did not occur (Supplementary Table 3). At E10 and E11, there were two- to threefold fewer mesonephric tubules present (but structurally normal in appearance). In mouse embryos, two distinct sets of mesonephric tubules are observed throughout mesonephric development (115). Four to six pairs of cranial mesonephric tubules develop as outgrowths of the Wolffian (or nephric) duct, whereas the remaining majority of tubules are caudal tubules which differentiate similarly to metanephric nephrons. The murine mesonephric tubules degenerate by apoptosis, except in males where the cranial tubules become the epididymal ducts. It was shown that in WT1 null embryos, the reduction in number of mesonephric tubules is due to the fact that these embryos only develop the cranial mesonephric tubules but not the caudal ones (115). Therefore, WT1 appears to regulate only development of the caudal mesonephric tubules.
Explant cultures of the mutant metanephric mesenchyme with embryonic spinal cord, a very strong inducer of mesenchymal to epithelial transformation, did not result in induction of the mesenchyme, suggesting that apoptosis of the metanephric mesenchyme was not a consequence of the absence of an inducing ureteric bud. This indicates that WT1 is required for the survival and early differentiation of the metanephric mesenchyme and that mesenchymal cell death is the result of an autonomous cell defect. Work by Donovan et al. (27) in 1999, however, has shown that the prospective metanephric mesenchyme that appears in WT1-/- embryos has indeed begun to differentiate toward the nephrogenic lineage, regardless of the absence of WT1. They examined the mutant mesenchyme for the expression of genetic markers of early mesenchymal differentiation and showed that Pax2, Six2, and GDNF ("glial cell line derived neurotrophic factor") mRNAs were present in the metanephric mesenchyme of WT1-/- embryos to levels comparable to wild-type metanephric mesenchyme of the same embryonic day. They also compared the histological appearance of WT1-/- mesenchyme with the surrounding mesenchyme of the urogenital ridge and demonstrated that the WT1-/- mesenchyme had a distinct histological appearance. From this study, it would appear that the initial differentiation of the metanephric mesenchyme does not require the presence of the ureteric bud or the intrinsic expression of WT1. Although Pax2 mRNA is present in the WT1-/- mesenchyme, no Pax2 protein can be detected in the mutant mesenchyme (67), indicating that WT1 may be required posttranscriptionally for the expression of Pax2.
WT1+/- mice have been analyzed on a 129/Sv inbred genetic background (66). Similar to the C57BL/6 WT1+/- mice (67), the 129/Sv WT1+/- mice had no apparent kidney phenotype. Although WT1+/-129/Sv males were fertile, WT1+/-129/Sv females produced no implanted embryos (Supplementary Table 3). Recall that WT1 is expressed in the gonad during development, as well as in the adult ovaries (epithelial and granulosa cells), oviduct, and uterus (105). Approximately 50% of WT1+/- females generated from a backcross of WT1+/-129/Sv:C57BL/6 F1 hybrids to 129/Sv were fertile, indicating the presence of a WT1 modifier gene that affects survival of the preimplantation embryo. There was no detectable change in the levels of WT1 protein or mRNA splice isoforms in the oviducts, ovary, and uterus of WT1+/- females, suggesting that this modifier gene may act downstream of WT1.
Another group also demonstrated that the penetrance of the WT1-/- phenotype depends on the existence of one or more modifier gene(s) (51). The WT1 null mutation was bred into the strains MF1, BALB/c, and C3H. Genotypic analysis of the offspring from intercrosses of heterozygous F1 animals revealed that WT1-/- animals were born in each case (Supplementary Table 3). Focusing on the MF1 background, the authors also observed a dramatic failure of spleen development, in addition to the well-characterized phenotypic abnormalities of the C57BL/6 WT1-/- embryo (67). Enhanced apoptosis was detected in the primordial spleen cells of the MF1 WT1-/- embryos. This mouse model will therefore be useful in studying involvement of WT1 in spleen development.
 |
A DDS Mouse Model
|
---|
A DDS mutation (named WT1tmT396) has been introduced into embryonic stem (ES) cells (102). Targeted ES cells produced wild-type and mutant transcripts of the WT1 gene in equal amounts, but analysis of the protein products revealed that the mutant protein accounted for only 5% of the total WT1 protein produced. The low levels of WT1tmT396 mutant protein produced were, however, sufficient to induce urogenital abnormalities in mice when these ES cells were used to generate transgenics (Supplementary Table 3). Low levels of DDS WT1 protein would be able to exert a strong dominant-negative effect if protein complexes containing wild-type WT1 and mutant WT1 were more stable than, or formed preferentially over, complexes containing only wild-type WT1. A single case of WT was observed where the transcript of the nontargeted allele harbored a mutation caused by an exon 9 skipping event, thus providing the sole example in mice associating WT development with WT1 dysfunction. This mouse model also demonstrates that some of the phenotypes associated with DDS can be caused by a mutant WT1 allele. In situ marker analysis of chimeric kidneys showed that mutant ES cells colonized the kidneys as efficiently as did wild-type cells (101). Furthermore, analysis of sclerotic glomeruli showed that all cells of the glomerular lineage, including mesangial cells, podocytes, and parietal epithelial cells of Bowmans capsule, were colonized by mutant ES cells in chimeric kidneys (101). Therefore, reduced expression of the DDS WT1 allele did not affect specification of the glomerular lineage early in nephrogenesis. Immunohistochemistry was used to analyze the levels of WT1 and Pax2 in podocytes of sclerotic and nonsclerotic chimeric glomeruli (101). The authors conclude that glomerular sclerosis is not due to loss of WT1 expression by the podocytes and that podocyte Pax2 expression is a consequence of glomerular sclerosis and reflects reexpression rather than persistent expression due to the loss of repression by WT1. Although these conclusions may be correct, interpretation of the immunohistochemistry data may be ambiguous for several reasons. First, the degree of glomerular sclerosis may affect the presence of proteins, such that loss of protein expression in highly sclerotic glomeruli may be due to tissue damage and therefore may not directly correlate with protein levels in a viable cell. Also, comparing nonsclerotic with sclerotic glomeruli within the same chimeric kidney may be misleading since some of the nonsclerotic glomeruli may be entering the initial stages of sclerosis.
 |
WT1 YAC Transgenic Mice
|
---|
A 280-kb yeast artificial chromosome (YAC) transgene (WT280) spanning the human WT1 locus was used to generate transgenic mouse lines which were then crossed with WT1 heterozygous mutant mice (91). Partial complementation of WT1 null embryos with the human WT1 transgene completely rescued the heart defects of the WT1 null embryos, but the defects of the urogenital system were only partially rescued. Consequently, WT1-/-/WT280+/- died within 48 h following birth. Histological analysis of postmortem WT1-/-/WT1280+/- kidneys showed a varying degree of kidney development ranging from kidney agenesis to severely hypodysplastic kidneys (Supplementary Table 3). Of particular interest is the fact that WT1-/-/WT280+/- kidneys never developed podocytes or mature glomerular structures.
Transgenic mouse lines were also created using a 470-kb YAC transgene (WT470) spanning the human WT1 locus (92). This transgene contains an additional 190 kb of sequence downstream of the human WT1 gene compared with the 280-kb YAC transgene. These transgenics were also used in crosses with WT1 heterozygous mutant mice (K mice) (45). The inclusion of putative regulatory sequences from the 3' untranslated region of the WT1 gene allowed for a higher expression level of the transgene. BKK mice (WT1 null with one copy of the human transgene) experienced severe kidney abnormalities (Supplementary Table 3). The expression patterns of WT1 and Pax2 within the BKK kidneys indicates that nephrogenesis is delayed and the kidneys harbored nephrogenic rests, indicative that nephrogenesis is completely blocked. The observed phenotype of the BBKK mice (WT1 null with two copies of the human transgene) was similar to the BKK mice, but much less severe (Supplementary Table 3).
These results reinforce the observations that WT1 plays an important role throughout nephrogenesis, and these provide evidence that continued WT1 expression is important for homeostasis of normal kidney function. This latter point was further demonstrated in the analysis of WT1+/- (K) mice. Eleven percent of these mice died within 150 days, and all diseased mice showed DMS with tubular cysts, protein casts, and severe interstitial inflammation, as well as severe albuminuria. These mice, however, were born with histologically normal kidneys, with no incidence of renal agenesis, and expression patterns of WT1 and Pax2 at day 10 were comparable to wild-type kidneys, indicating that nephrogenesis was not delayed in these kidneys.
Apart from the clear developmental abnormalities observed in the BKK mice (renal aplasia and nephrogenic rests), the observed kidney diseases are unlikely to be caused by developmental defects, but rather by insufficient levels of functional WT1 protein. This is consistent with the suggestion that DDS is a consequence of the formation of WT1 heterodimers, between wild-type protein and mutant protein, leading to a reduction of functional wild-type protein. This will therefore be a useful model system in studying the involvement of WT1 in glomerular disease.
 |
A Frasier Syndrome Mouse Model
|
---|
Input about the role of the specific functions of different WT1 isoforms during development came from studies of patients with Frasier syndrome and the analysis of genetically modified mice. Frasier syndrome is associated with a reduction of the WT1(+KTS) isoforms, suggesting that an important equilibrium between the different WT1 isoforms is required for normal renal and testicular development. Transgenic mice have been generated which express either only the +KTS WT1 isoforms (KTS mice) or only the -KTS WT1 isoforms (Frasier mice), further allowing the analysis of the respective functions of these WT1 isoforms (49). In general, Frasier mice have defects in the formation of the glomerular podocyte layer and in male sex determination (Supplementary Table 3). KTS mice are more severely affected and have hypodysplastic kidneys and streak gonads (Supplementary Table 3).
In both mouse models, adrenal glands and spleen appear normal, and metanephric induction occurs in both, indicating that there is a partial functional redundancy between the +KTS and -KTS isoforms, despite their distinct nuclear distribution and differences in DNA binding affinities. The phenotype of the homozygous Frasier mice, however, suggests the WT1(+KTS) isoforms are important for development of podocyte architecture and rigidity of the glomerular tuft (see Supplementary Table 3). The phenotype of the homozygous KTS mice, on the other hand, suggests that the -KTS isoforms are important for the survival of embryonic tissue, including both the kidney and the gonadal primordium.
 |
WT1 Exon 5 Targeted Mouse
|
---|
The alternative splicing event at exon 5 of the WT1 gene results in the presence or absence of 17 amino acids positioned between the transcriptional regulatory and DNA-binding domains of WT1 (Fig. 2). This sequence has been suggested to contain a transcriptional repression domain and is involved in an interaction with the transcriptional regulatory protein Par-4 (52, 114). The alternatively spliced exon 5 is only found in placental mammals (61), suggesting that the WT1(+exon 5) isoforms are not required for kidney or gonad development in lower vertebrates. WT1(+exon 5), however, may be important for mammal-specific functions, such as embryonic implantation or lactation. The temporal and spatial expression patterns of WT1 in the uterus and mammary gland support this hypothesis. In the rat, the uterine stroma has been shown to express WT1 differentially during sexual maturation (139). Juvenile rats express high levels of WT1 mRNA, whereas sexually mature rats have lower levels, and WT1 expression is significantly upregulated at the embryonic implantation site (139). In the mouse, WT1 exon 5 transcripts appear to be underrepresented in the uterus (113). At 1.5 days postcoitum, however, a separate study shows that each of the four major WT1 transcripts are expressed and that the WT1(+/+) isoform predominates (66). WT1 expression has also been observed during postnatal development of the mammary gland, such as during puberty or lactation (122). To test whether WT1(+exon 5) isoforms play a role in embryonic implantation and lactation in mammals, mice lacking WT1(+exon 5) have been generated by gene targeting (98). It was reported that mice lacking WT1(+exon 5) develop normally (Supplementary Table 3). Adult mice are viable and fertile, and females are capable of lactation, revealing that WT1 exon 5 is not required for any of these functions. Long-term survival studies with this mouse model will determine whether exon 5-containing isoforms play a role in maintenance of organ function in the mouse.
Given the differences in expression of WT1 exon 5 isoforms between human, mouse, and rat tissue, it is possible that WT1(+exon 5) isoforms have species-specific functions and may therefore not be redundant in humans and rats. For example, interactions of WT1 with coregulatory proteins may be species as well as tissue specific. WT1 has been shown to interact with Par-4 through the WT1 exon 5 sequences (114) and through the WT1 Zn-finger domain (59). These different interactions have opposing consequences on WT1 transcriptional activity (see Table 2). The expression level of WT1(+exon 5) isoforms may therefore result in different biological effects through this type of interaction. Indeed, the different WT1 splice isoforms have been shown to have different effects on cell growth in a cell type-specific manner, where WT1 exon 5 containing isoforms appear to be more efficient at inducing cell cycle arrest and at inhibiting apoptosis (reviewed in Refs. 111 and 119).
 |
DDS WT1(-exon 5) and DDS WT1(+exon 5) Mice
|
---|
Another approach taken to understand the role of WT1(+exon 5) isoforms in podocyte development and maintenance of kidney function has been to express DDS WT1 alleles in podocyte cells (97). This study was made possible by the identification of the nephrin gene promoter, which allows for specific expression of nephrin in podocyte cells of the glomerulus (136). The nephrin promoter region has been shown to be able to direct podocyte-specific gene expression in transgenic mice (136). This promoter was used to specifically express a truncated form of the WT1 cDNA (associated with DDS in humans) in podocytes. Two transgenes were constructed differing only in the presence or absence of exon 5 sequences. Four adult mice were obtained with the WT1(+exon 5) transgene. Overall, these mice appeared normal and displayed normal kidney function (Supplementary Table 3). Histological examination revealed that the glomeruli were normal. Only one adult mouse with the WT1(-exon 5) transgene was obtained, but genetic analysis of offsprings at E18 revealed that transgenic embryos were obtained at the expected frequency. Seven of eight transgenic embryos obtained had abnormal appearing glomeruli (Supplementary Table 3). The glomerular tufts had fewer capillary loops, which were abnormally wide, and there was reduced platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1) expression at the glomerular endothelial cells. These results suggest that WT1 isoforms lacking exon 5 have a greater role in directing podocyte differentiation and are in agreement with the WT1 exon 5 targeted mouse model described above, where lack of exon 5 containing WT1 isoforms does not affect kidney development. This data strengthens the hypothesis that differential interactions between the different WT1 protein isoforms and coregulatory proteins may have tissue-specific functions.
During glomerular capillary development, podocytes normally express angiogenic growth factors such as transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). In response to the production of angiogenic and other growth factors by podocytes, endothelial cells express cell surface molecules such as PECAM-1. This transgenic mouse data suggests that WT1-dependent interactions between the developing capillaries of the glomerulus and the podocytes are required for normal development of the capillary plexus. It is also possible that WT1 may regulate the expression of growth factors that affect vascular development in glomeruli.
 |
WT1* -Deficient Mice
|
---|
Similar to the 17 amino acid sequence corresponding to WT1 exon 5, only mammalian WT1 possesses the 68 amino acid NH2-terminal extension arising from alternative translation initiation, referred to as WT1* (87). It is therefore possible that this WT1 isoform may be involved in regulating a mammalian-specific event required for urogenital system development or other mammalian-specific events such as embryo implantation and lactation. In vitro studies show that WT1* isoforms behave similarly to WT1 isoforms originating from the initiator AUG (14). WT1* localizes to the cell nucleus, is capable of mediating transcriptional repression in reporter gene assays, and is present in all WT1-expressing tissues and cell lines analyzed, including testis, ovary, uterus, kidney, and WTs. We have therefore postulated that WT1* may modify the activity of WT1 within the cell, possibly by heterodimerization with other WT1 isoforms and/or by interaction with different WT1 cofactors.
Gene targeting was used to specifically inhibit CUG-initiated WT1 translation by the insertion of a translation stop signal 12 amino acids downstream of the CUG initiator (88). Homozygous mutant mice were observed up to 1 yr of age and found to be viable and healthy. Both homozygous mutant males and females produced normal litter sizes, and homozygous mutant females nursed their offspring to weaning age. Histological analysis of hematoxylin-eosin-stained kidney, testis, ovary, and uterus sections revealed no detectable differences between wild-type and homozygous mutant tissue. Therefore, similar to mice lacking the WT1 exon 5 isoform, mice deficient in the WT1* isoform also have normal urogenital system development and are not impaired in any mammalian-specific functions. The authors postulate that perhaps the WT1* and the exon 5 isoforms coevolved during vertebrate evolution to perform mammalian-specific functions that appear to be redundant in mice.
 |
WT1/p53 Compound Mutant Mice
|
---|
p53 was identified as a protein immunoprecipitating with WT1 from baby rat kidney cells stably expressing WT1 and from WT specimens (79). Data in the literature also suggests that the two proteins affect each others biological activities (Table 2; 79, 118). WT1 interacts with the product of the p53 tumor suppressor gene through its zinc finger region (79). Through this interaction, WT1 stabilizes p53, enhances binding of p53 to its consensus sequence, and inhibits p53-mediated apoptosis triggered by ultraviolet radiation (77). Furthermore, p53 can convert WT1 from an activator to a repressor of a given reporter gene construct (79). A homolog of p53, named p73, is also able to interact with WT1 through the zinc finger region of WT1 (118). Dimerization of WT1 and p73 causes both transcription factors to have reduced transcriptional activation potential, and p73 inhibits DNA binding by WT1. Furthermore, anaplastic WTs are refractory to treatment and have been linked to a higher frequency of p53 mutations (5, 6).
To study the interaction between WT1 and p53 in vivo, WT1+/- mice were crossed with either p53+/- or p53-/- mice (Supplementary Table 3) (84). Similar to WT1 null embryos, double-null embryos developed pericardial bleeding and died in utero. Whereas WT1-/- embryos were resorbed between E13 and E15, no WT1-/-/p53-/- embryos survived beyond E11.5. This implies that a genetic interaction exists between WT1 and p53, but histopathological analysis of the embryos did not provide any data to suggest the cause of the embryonic lethality. WT1+/-/p53-/- mice developed lymphomas earlier than p53-/- mice, which is the most likely cause of the reduced survival rate of WT1+/-/p53-/- mice compared with p53-/- mice (Supplementary Table 3). Although this suggests that WT1 may function as a tumor suppressor in lymphoma development, the lymphomas analyzed in this study still expressed wild-type WT1. WT1 may therefore affect the apoptotic functions of p53 in the thymus.
There are no major kidney defects observed in WT1+/-/p53-/- mice. As has been observed in several mouse models, heterozygosity for WT1 leads to increased predisposition to glomerulosclerosis. Kidney tubules of WT1+/-/p53-/- mice developed neoplasms resembling oncocytomas, i.e., benign tubular neoplasms. Since WT1 is not expressed in adult kidney tubules, the predisposition to oncocytomas is thought to be caused by a disrupted developmental process that occurs in early tubule precursors at a time when WT1 is expressed.
p53 is a major regulator of stress responses, and there is evidence that WT1 may modulate p53 function in response to stress (77, 138). p73 and p63 are involved in regulating fundamental processes associated with differentiation and development (89, 120, 137). Interaction of WT1 with other p53 family members may be more important in regulating development and differentiation. Genetic crosses between WT1 mutant mice and either p73 or p63 mutant mice may uncover functional consequences of the interaction of WT1 with these p53 family members during kidney development or development of other organ systems expressing WT1.
 |
WT1/Pax2 Compound Heterozygous Mutant Mice
|
---|
The early expression of WT1 and Pax2 during kidney development established the presence of critical but underexplored developmental pathways in the kidneys. Mice harboring targeted disruptions and/or spontaneous mutations of either the WT1 or Pax2 genes (34, 67, 126), as well as transgenic mice with deregulated overexpression of Pax2 (30), exhibit structural kidney defects and impaired renal function. In vitro reporter gene assays and analysis of endogenous gene expression suggest that WT1 and Pax2 regulate each others expression during renal development (23, 83). To better define the relationship between WT1 and Pax2 during renal development, we generated mouse embryos containing heterozygous mutations in both genes by mating WT1+/- heterozygous mutants (67) with Pax21Neu/+ heterozygous mutants (25, 34, 107). Analysis of WT1+/-/Pax21Neu/+ compound heterozygotes revealed that the WT1 gene is a modifier of the Pax2 mutant phenotype. WT1+/-/Pax21Neu/+ kidneys were 50% smaller than wild-type kidneys and 20% smaller than Pax21Neu/+ kidneys. They were characterized by severe attenuation of the renal medulla, and reduced development of calyces and the renal pelvis. Renal cortex development in compound heterozygotes was similar to Pax21Neu/+ cortex development. Only minor variations in the mesenchymal expression pattern of Pax2 protein, and the mRNA expression levels of WT1 and Pax2, were noted in mutant kidneys. Furthermore, we show that WT1 and Pax2 proteins interact in vitro and in vivo demonstrating that WT1 and Pax2 can form a molecular complex. We postulate that haploinsufficiency for both WT1 and Pax2, resulting in reduced accumulation of both proteins within the cell, may result in an insufficient amount of total protein to allow heterodimerization of WT1 and Pax2. Loss of this complex formation may be responsible for the more severe kidney defects we have observed in WT1+/-/Pax21Neu/+ compound heterozygotes.
 |
Conclusion
|
---|
Mouse models of WT1 have enabled us to learn much about the role this tumor suppressor gene plays in normal and abnormal development that could not have been gauged from cell culture systems. Additionally, the absence of some of the WT1 isoforms in lower organisms, as well as differences in urogenital development among species, precludes the use of nonmammalian genetic systems to study WT1 function. Hence, mouse models represent one of the few approaches by which to systematically dissect the contribution of the different WT1 isoforms to mammalian urogenital development. These models also set the stage for the generation of compound heterozygote mutants that may be useful in uncovering previously hidden biological connections between different gene pathways.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
|
---|
P. Meltzer served as the review editor for this manuscript submitted by Editor J. Pelletier.
Research in our laboratory on Wilms tumor is supported by funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and the National Cancer Institute of Canada.
 |
FOOTNOTES
|
---|
Article published online before print. See web site for date of publication (http://physiolgenomics.physiology.org).
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. Pelletier, McGill Univ., Dept. of Biochemistry, 3655 Promenade Sir-William-Osler, Rm. 810, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1Y6, Canada (E-mail: jerry.pelletier{at}mcgill.ca).
10.1152/physiolgenomics.00164.2003.
1 The Supplementary Material for this article (Supplementary Table 3, a list of genetic mouse models involving the WT1 gene) is available online at http://physiolgenomics.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/00164.2003/DC1. 
 |
References
|
---|
- Armstrong JF, Pritchard-Jones K, Bickmore WA, Hastie ND, and Bard JB. The expression of the Wilms tumor gene, WT1, in the developing mammalian embryo. Mech Dev 40: 8597, 1993.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Baird PN, Groves N, Haber DA, Housman DE, and Cowell JK. Identification of mutations in the WT1 gene in tumors from patients with the WAGR syndrome. Oncogene 7: 21412149, 1992.[ISI][Medline]
- Baird PN, Santos A, Groves N, Jadresic L, and Cowell JK. Constitutional mutations in the WT1 gene in patients with Denys-Drash syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 1: 301305, 1992.[Abstract]
- Barbaux S, Niaudet P, Gubler MC, Grunfeld JP, Jaubert F, Kuttenn F, Fekete CN, Souleyreau-Therville N, Thibaud E, Fellous M, and McElreavey K. Donor splice-site mutations in WT1 are responsible for Frasier syndrome. Nat Genet 17: 467470, 1997.[ISI][Medline]
- Bardeesy N, Beckwith JB, and Pelletier J. Clonal expansion and attenuated apoptosis in Wilms tumors are associated with p53 gene mutations. Cancer Res 55: 215219, 1995.[Abstract]
- Bardeesy N, Falkoff D, Petruzzi MJ, Nowak N, Zabel B, Adam M, Aguiar MC, Grundy P, Shows T, and Pelletier J. Anaplastic Wilms tumor, a subtype displaying poor prognosis, harbours p53 gene mutations. Nat Genet 7: 9197, 1994.[ISI][Medline]
- Bardeesy N and Pelletier J. Overlapping RNA and DNA binding domains of the wt1 tumor suppressor gene product. Nucleic Acids Res 26: 17841792, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Beckwith JB, Kiviat NB, and Bonadio JF. Nephrogenic rests, nephroblastomatosis, and the pathogenesis of Wilms tumor. Pediatr Pathol 10: 136, 1990.[Medline]
- Bennington JL and Beckwith JB. Tumors of the kidney, renal pelvis and ureter. In: Atlas of Tumor Pathology. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1975, series 2, fascile 12.
- Brown KW and Malik KTA. The molecular biology of Wilms tumor. Exp Rev Mol Med May 14, 2001 (http://www-ermm.cbcu.cam.ac.uk/01003027h.htm).
- Brown KW, Watson JE, Poirier V, Mott MG, Berry PJ, and Maitland NJ. Inactivation of the remaining allele of the WT1 gene in a Wilms tumor from a WAGR patient. Oncogene 7: 763768, 1992.[ISI][Medline]
- Bruening W, Bardeesy N, Silverman BL, Cohn RA, Machin GA, Aronson AJ, Housman D, and Pelletier J. Germline intronic and exonic mutations in the Wilms tumor gene (WT1) affecting urogenital development. Nat Genet 1: 144148, 1992.[ISI][Medline]
- Bruening W, Moffett P, Chia S, Heinrich G, and Pelletier J. Identification of nuclear localization signals within the zinc fingers of the WT1 tumor suppressor gene product. FEBS Lett 393: 4147, 1996.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Bruening W and Pelletier J. A non-AUG translational initiation event generates novel WT1 isoforms. J Biol Chem 271: 86468654, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Buckler AJ, Pelletier J, Haber DA, Glaser T, and Housman DE. Isolation, characterization, and expression of the murine Wilms tumor gene (WT1) during kidney development. Mol Cell Biol 11: 17071712, 1991.[ISI][Medline]
- Call KM, Glaser T, Ito CY, Buckler AJ, Pelletier J, Haber DA, Rose EA, Kral A, Yeger H, Lewis WH, Jones C, and Housman DE. Isolation and characterization of a zinc finger polypeptide gene at the human chromosome 11 Wilms tumor locus. Cell 60: 509520, 1990.[ISI][Medline]
- Caricasole A, Duarte A, Larsson SH, Hastie ND, Little M, Holmes G, Todorov I, and Ward A. RNA binding by the Wilms tumor suppressor zinc finger proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 75627566, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Charles AK, Brown KW, and Berry PJ. Microdissecting the genetic events in nephrogenic rests and Wilms tumor development. Am J Pathol 153: 9911000, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Cook DM, Hinkes MT, Bernfield M, and Rauscher FJ III. Transcriptional activation of the syndecan-1 promoter by the Wilms tumor protein WT1. Oncogene 13: 17891799, 1996.[ISI][Medline]
- Coppes MJ, Liefers GJ, Paul P, Yeger H, and Williams BR. Homozygous somatic Wt1 point mutations in sporadic unilateral Wilms tumor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 14161419, 1993.[Abstract]
- Cowell JK, Wadey RB, Haber DA, Call KM, Housman DE, and Pritchard J. Structural rearrangements of the WT1 gene in Wilms tumor cells. Oncogene 6: 595599, 1991.[ISI][Medline]
- Davies RC, Calvio C, Bratt E, Larsson SH, Lamond AI, and Hastie ND. WT1 interacts with the splicing factor U2AF65 in an isoform-dependent manner and can be incorporated into spliceosomes. Genes Dev 12: 32173225, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Dehbi M, Ghahremani M, Lechner M, Dressler G, and Pelletier J. The paired-box transcription factor, PAX2, positively modulates expression of the Wilms tumor suppressor gene (WT1). Oncogene 13: 447453, 1996.[ISI][Medline]
- Denys P, Malvaux P, van den Berghe H, Tanghe W, and Proesmans W. Association dun syndrome anatomo-pathologique de Pseudohermaphrodisme masculin, dune tumeur de Wilms, dune nephropathie parenchymateuse et dune mosaicisme XX/XY. Arch Fr Pediatr 24: 729739, 1967.[ISI][Medline]
- Discenza MT, He S, Lee TH, Chu LL, Bolon B, Goodyer P, Eccles M, and Pelletier J. WT1 is a modifier of the Pax2 mutant phenotype: cooperation and interaction between WT1 and Pax2. Oncogene 22: 81458155, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Dome JS and Coppes MJ. Recent advances in Wilms tumor genetics. Curr Opin Pediatr 14: 511, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Donovan MJ, Natoli TA, Sainio K, Amstutz A, Jaenisch R, Sariola H, and Kreidberg JA. Initial differentiation of the metanephric mesenchyme is independent of WT1 and the ureteric bud. Dev Genet 24: 252262, 1999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Drash A, Sherman F, Hartmann WH, and Blizzard RM. A syndrome of pseudohermaphroditism, Wilms tumor, hypertension, and degenerative renal disease. J Pediatr , 76, 585593, 1970.
- Dressler GR, Deutsch U, Chowdhury K, Nornes HO, and Gruss P. Pax2, a new murine paired-box-containing gene and its expression in the developing excretory system. Development 109: 787795, 1990.[Abstract]
- Dressler GR, Wilkinson JE, Rothenpieler UW, Patterson LT, Williams-Simons L, and Westphal H. Deregulation of Pax-2 expression in transgenic mice generates severe kidney abnormalities. Nature 362: 6567, 1993.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Drummond IA, Madden SL, Rohwer-Nutter P, Bell GI, Sukhatme VP, and Rauscher FJ III. Repression of the insulin-like growth factor II gene by the Wilms tumor suppressor WT1. Science 257: 674678, 1992.[ISI][Medline]
- Englert C, Hou X, Maheswaran S, Bennett P, Ngwu C, Re GG, Garvin AJ, Rosner MR, and Haber DA. WT1 suppresses synthesis of the epidermal growth factor receptor and induces apoptosis. EMBO J 14: 46624675, 1995.[Abstract]
- Englert C, Vidal M, Maheswaran S, Ge Y, Ezzell RM, Isselbacher KJ, and Haber DA. Truncated WT1 mutants alter the subnuclear localization of the wild-type protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 1196011964, 1995.[Abstract]
- Favor J, Sandulache R, Neuhauser-Klaus A, Pretsch W, Chatterjee B, Senft E, Wurst W, Blanquet V, Grimes P, Sporle R, and Schughart K. The mouse Pax2(1Neu) mutation is identical to a human PAX2 mutation in a family with renal-coloboma syndrome and results in developmental defects of the brain, ear, eye, and kidney. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 1387013875, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Frasier S, Bashore RA, and Mosier HD. Gonadoblastoma associated with pure gonadal dysgenesis in monozygotic twins. J Pediatr 64: 740745, 1964.[ISI]
- Fraizer GC, Patmasiriwat P, Zhang X, and Saunders GF. Expression of the tumor suppressor gene WT1 in both human and mouse bone marrow. Blood 86: 47044706, 1995.[Free Full Text]
- Gessler M, Konig A, and Bruns GA. The genomic organization and expression of the WT1 gene. Genomics 12: 807813, 1992.[ISI][Medline]
- Gessler M, Poustka A, Cavenee W, Neve RL, Orkin SH, and Bruns GA. Homozygous deletion in Wilms tumors of a zinc-finger gene identified by chromosome jumping. Nature 343: 774778, 1990.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Gilbert SF. Developmental Biology (6th ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer, 2000, chapt. 17, p. 524533.
- Glaser T, Lane J, and Housman D. A mouse model of the aniridia-Wilms tumor deletion syndrome. Science 250: 823827, 1990.[ISI][Medline]
- Goldman SK, Oh S, and Dorst JP. The Drash syndrome: male pseudohermaphroditism, nephritis, and Wilms tumor. Radiology 141: 8791, 1981.[Abstract]
- Green DM. Wilms tumor. Eur J Cancer 33: 409420, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Gross I, Morrison DJ, Hyink DP, Georgas K, English MA, Mericskay M, Hosono S, Sassoon D, Wilson PD, Little M, and Licht JD. The receptor tyrosine kinase regulator Sprouty1 is a target of the tumor suppressor WT1 and important for kidney development. J Biol Chem 278: 4142041430, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Guan LS, Rauchman M, and Wang ZY. Induction of Rb-associated protein (RbAp46) by Wilms tumor suppressor WT1 mediates growth inhibition. J Biol Chem 273: 2704727050, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Guo JK, Menke AL, Gubler MC, Clarke AR, Harrison D, Hammes A, Hastie ND, and Schedl A. WT1 is a key regulator of podocyte function: reduced expression levels cause crescentic glomerulonephritis and mesangial sclerosis. Hum Mol Genet 11: 651659, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Haber DA, Buckler AJ, Glaser T, Call KM, Pelletier J, Sohn RL, Douglass EC, and Housman DE. An internal deletion within an 11p13 zinc finger gene contributes to the development of Wilms tumor. Cell 61: 12571269, 1990.[ISI][Medline]
- Haber DA, Sohn RL, Buckler AJ, Pelletier J, Call KM, and Housman DE. Alternative splicing and genomic structure of the Wilms tumor gene WT1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 96189622, 1991.[Abstract]
- Habib R, Gubler MC, Antignac C, and Gagnadoux MF. Diffuse mesangial sclerosis: a congenital glomerulopathy with nephrotic syndrome. Adv Nephrol Necker Hosp 22: 4357, 1993.[Medline]
- Hammes A, Guo JK, Lutsch G, Leheste JR, Landrock D, Ziegler U, Gubler MC, and Schedl A. Two splice variants of the Wilms tumor 1 gene have distinct functions during sex determination and nephron formation. Cell 106: 319329, 2001.[ISI][Medline]
- Haning RV Jr, Chesney RW, Moorthy AV, and Gilbert EF. A syndrome of chronic renal failure and XY gonadal dysgenesis in young phenotypic females without genital ambiguity. Am J Kidney Dis 6: 4048, 1985.[ISI][Medline]
- Herzer U, Crocoll A, Barton D, Howells N, and Englert C. The Wilms tumor suppressor gene wt1 is required for development of the spleen. Curr Biol 9: 837840, 1999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Hewitt SM and Saunders GF. Differentially spliced exon 5 of the Wilms tumor gene WT1 modifies gene function. Anticancer Res 16: 621626, 1996.[ISI][Medline]
- Hill RE, Favor J, Hogan BL, Ton CC, Saunders GF, Hanson IM, Prosser J, Jordan T, Hastie ND, and van Heyningen V. Mouse small eye results from mutations in a paired-like homeobox-containing gene. Nature 354: 522525, 1991.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Hosono S, Gross I, English MA, Hajra KM, Fearon ER, and Licht JD. E-cadherin is a WT1 target gene. J Biol Chem 275: 1094310953, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Hsu SY, Kubo M, Chun SY, Haluska FG, Housman DE, and Hsueh AJ. Wilms tumor protein WT1 as an ovarian transcription factor: decreases in expression during follicle development and repression of inhibin-alpha gene promoter. Mol Endocrinol 9: 13561366, 1995.[Abstract]
- Huff V, Miwa H, Haber DA, Call KM, Housman D, Strong LC, and Saunders GF. Evidence for WT1 as a Wilms tumor (WT) gene: intragenic germinal deletion in bilateral WT. Am J Hum Genet 48: 9971003, 1991.[ISI][Medline]
- Iben S and Royer-Pokora B. Analysis of native WT1 protein from frozen human kidney and Wilms tumors. Oncogene 18: 25332536, 1999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Jadresic L, Leake J, Gordon I, Dillon MJ, Grant DB, Pritchard J, Risdon RA, and Barratt TM. Clinicopathologic review of twelve children with nephropathy, Wilms tumor, and genital abnormalities (Drash syndrome). J Pediatr 117: 717725, 1990.[ISI][Medline]
- Johnstone RW, See RH, Sells SF, Wang J, Muthukkumar S, Englert C, Haber DA, Licht JD, Sugrue SP, Roberts T, Rangnekar VM, and Shi Y. A novel repressor, par-4, modulates transcription and growth suppression functions of the Wilms tumor suppressor WT1. Mol Cell Biol 16: 69456956, 1996.[Abstract]
- Johnstone RW, Wang J, Tommerup N, Vissing H, Roberts T, and Shi Y. Ciao 1 is a novel WD40 protein that interacts with the tumor suppressor protein WT1. J Biol Chem 273: 1088010887, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kent J, Coriat AM, Sharpe PT, Hastie ND, and van Heyningen V. The evolution of WT1 sequence and expression pattern in the vertebrates. Oncogene 11: 17811792, 1995.[ISI][Medline]
- Kent J, Lee M, Schedl A, Boyle S, Fantes J, Powell M, Rushmere N, Abbott C, van Heyningen V, and Bickmore WA. The reticulocalbin gene maps to the WAGR region in human and to the Small eye Harwell deletion in mouse. Genomics 42: 260267, 1997.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Kim J, Prawitt D, Bardeesy N, Torban E, Vicaner C, Goodyer P, Zabel B, and Pelletier J. The Wilms tumor suppressor gene (wt1) product regulates Dax-1 gene expression during gonadal differentiation. Mol Cell Biol 19: 22892299, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kinberg JA, Angle CR, and Wilson RB. Nephropathy-gonadal dysgenesis, type 2: renal failure in three siblings with XY dysgenesis in one. Am J Kidney Dis 9: 507510, 1987.[ISI][Medline]
- Klamt B, Koziell A, Poulat F, Wieacker P, Scambler P, Berta P, and Gessler M. Frasier syndrome is caused by defective alternative splicing of WT1 leading to an altered ratio of WT1 +/-KTS splice isoforms. Hum Mol Genet 7: 709714, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kreidberg JA, Natoli TA, McGinnis L, Donovan M, Biggers JD, and Amstutz A. Coordinate action of Wt1 and a modifier gene supports embryonic survival in the oviduct. Mol Reprod Dev 52: 366375, 1999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Kreidberg JA, Sariola H, Loring JM, Maeda M, Pelletier J, Housman D, and Jaenisch R. WT-1 is required for early kidney development. Cell 74: 679691, 1993.[ISI][Medline]
- Ladomery MR, Slight J, Mc Ghee S, and Hastie ND. Presence of WT1, the Wilms tumor suppressor gene product, in nuclear poly(A)(+) ribonucleoprotein. J Biol Chem 274: 3652036526, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Larsson SH, Charlieu JP, Miyagawa K, Engelkamp D, Rassoulzadegan M, Ross A, Cuzin F, van Heyningen V, and Hastie ND. Subnuclear localization of WT1 in splicing or transcription factor domains is regulated by alternative splicing. Cell 81: 391401, 1995.[ISI][Medline]
- Lee SB, Huang K, Palmer R, Truong VB, Herzlinger D, Kolquist KA, Wong J, Paulding C, Yoon SK, Gerald W, Oliner JD, and Haber DA. The Wilms tumor suppressor WT1 encodes a transcriptional activator of amphiregulin. Cell 98: 663673, 1999.[ISI][Medline]
- Lee TH, Lwu S, Kim J, and Pelletier J. Inhibition of Wilms tumor 1 transactivation by bone marrow zinc finger 2, a novel transcriptional repressor. J Biol Chem 277: 4482644837, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lee TH, Moffett P, and Pelletier J. The Wilms tumor suppressor gene (wt1) product represses different functional classes of transcriptional activation domains. Nucleic Acids Res 27: 28892897, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lee TH and Pelletier J. Functional characterization of WT1 binding sites within the human vitamin D receptor gene promoter. Physiol Genomics 7: 187200, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Little NA, Hastie ND, and Davies RC. Identification of WTAP, a novel Wilms tumour 1-associating protein. Hum Mol Genet 9: 22312239, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Little MH, Prosser J, Condie A, Smith PJ, van Heyningen V, and Hastie ND. Zinc finger point mutations within the WT1 gene in Wilms tumor patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 47914795, 1992.[Abstract]
- Machin GA. Persistent renal blastema as a precursor of Wilms tumor. In: Wilms Tumor: Clinical and Biological Manifestations, edited by Pochedly C and Baum ES. New York: Elsevier, 1984, p. 234238.
- Maheswaran S, Englert C, Bennett P, Heinrich G, and Haber DA. The WT1 gene product stabilizes p53 and inhibits p53-mediated apoptosis. Genes Dev 9: 21432156, 1995.[Abstract]
- Maheswaran S, Englert C, Zheng G, Lee SB, Wong J, Harkin DP, Bean J, Ezzell R, Garvin AJ, McCluskey RT, DeCaprio JA, and Haber DA. Inhibition of cellular proliferation by the Wilms tumor suppressor WT1 requires association with the inducible chaperone Hsp70. Genes Dev 12: 11081120, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Maheswaran S, Park S, Bernard A, Morris JF, Rauscher FJ III, Hill DE, and Haber DA. Physical and functional interaction between WT1 and p53 proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 51005104, 1993.[Abstract]
- Manivel JC, Sibley RK, and Dehner LP. Complete and incomplete Drash syndrome: a clinicopathologic study of five cases of a dysontogenetic-neoplastic complex. Hum Pathol 18: 8089, 1987.[ISI][Medline]
- Matsunaga E. Genetics of Wilms tumor. Hum Genet 57: 231246, 1981.[ISI][Medline]
- Matsuzawa-Watanabe Y, Inoue J, and Semba K. Transcriptional activity of testis-determining factor SRY is modulated by the Wilms tumor 1 gene product, WT1. Oncogene 22: 59565960, 2003.
- McConnell MJ, Cunliffe HE, Chua LJ, Ward TA, and Eccles MR. Differential regulation of the human Wilms tumor suppressor gene (WT1) promoter by two isoforms of PAX2. Oncogene 14: 26892700, 1997.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Menke AL, Clarke AR, Leitch A, Ijpenberg A, Williamson KA, Spraggon L, Harrison DJ, and Hastie ND. Genetic interactions between the Wilms tumor 1 gene and the p53 gene. Cancer Res 62: 66156620, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Menke A, McInnes L, Hastie ND, and Schedl A. The Wilms tumor suppressor WT1: approaches to gene function. Kidney Int 53: 15121518, 1998.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Menke AL, IJpenberg A, Fleming S, Ross A, Medine CN, Patek CE, Spraggon L, Hughes J, Clarke AR, and Hastie ND. The wt1-heterozygous mouse: a model to study the development of glomerular sclerosis. J Pathol 200: 667674, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Miles C, Elgar G, Coles E, Kleinjan DJ, van Heyningen V, and Hastie N. Complete sequencing of the Fugu WAGR region from WT1 to PAX6: dramatic compaction and conservation of synteny with human chromosome 11p13. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 1306813072, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Miles CG, Slight J, Spraggon L, OSullivan M, Patek C, and Hastie ND. Mice lacking the 68-amino-acid, mammal-specific N-terminal extension of WT1 develop normally and are fertile. Mol Cell Biol 23: 26082613, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Mills AA, Zheng B, Wang XJ, Vogel H, Roop DR, and Bradley A. p63 is a p53 homologue required for limb and epidermal morphogenesis. Nature 398: 708713, 1999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Moffett P, Bruening W, Nakagama H, Bardeesy N, Housman D, Housman DE, and Pelletier J. Antagonism of WT1 activity by protein self-association. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 1110511109, 1995.[Abstract]
- Moore AW, McInnes L, Kreidberg J, Hastie ND, and Schedl A. YAC complementation shows a requirement for WT1 in the development of epicardium, adrenal gland and throughout nephrogenesis. Development 126: 18451857, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Moore AW, Schedl A, McInnes L, Doyle M, Hecksher-Sorensen J, and Hastie ND. YAC transgenic analysis reveals Wilms tumor 1 gene activity in the proliferating coelomic epithelium, developing diaphragm and limb. Mech Dev 79: 169184, 1998.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Morris JF, Madden SL, Tournay OE, Cook DM, Sukhatme VP, and Rauscher FJ III. Characterization of the zinc finger protein encoded by the WT1 Wilms tumor locus. Oncogene 6: 23392348, 1991.[ISI][Medline]
- Mundlos S, Pelletier J, Darveau A, Bachmann M, Winterpacht A, and Zabel B. Nuclear localization of the protein encoded by the Wilms tumor gene WT1 in embryonic and adult tissues. Development 119: 13291341, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Nachtigal MW, Hirokawa Y, Enyeart-VanHouten DL, Flanagan JN, Hammer GD, and Ingraham HA. Wilms tumor 1 and Dax-1 modulate the orphan nuclear receptor SF-1 in sex-specific gene expression. Cell 93: 445454, 1998.[ISI][Medline]
- Nakagama H, Heinrich G, Pelletier J, and Housman DE. Sequence and structural requirements for high-affinity DNA binding by the WT1 gene product. Mol Cell Biol 15: 14891498, 1995.[Abstract]
- Natoli TA, Liu J, Eremina V, Hodgens K, Li C, Hamano Y, Mundel P, Kalluri R, Miner JH, Quaggin SE, and Kreidberg JA. A mutant form of the Wilms tumor suppressor gene WT1 observed in Denys-Drash syndrome interferes with glomerular capillary development. J Am Soc Nephrol 13: 20582067, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Natoli TA, McDonald A, Alberta JA, Taglienti ME, Housman DE, and Kreidberg JA. A mammal-specific exon of WT1 is not required for development or fertility. Mol Cell Biol 22: 44334438, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Palmer RE, Kotsianti A, Cadman B, Boyd T, Gerald W, and Haber DA. WT1 regulates the expression of the major glomerular podocyte membrane protein Podocalyxin. Curr Biol 11: 18051809, 2001.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Park S, Bernard A, Bove KE, Sens DA, Hazen-Martin DJ, Garvin AJ, and Haber DA. Inactivation of WT1 in nephrogenic rests, genetic precursors to Wilms tumor. Nat Genet 5: 363367, 1993.[ISI][Medline]
- Patek CE, Fleming S, Miles CG, Bellamy CO, Ladomery M, Spraggon L, Mullins J, Hastie ND, and Hooper ML. Murine Denys-Drash syndrome: evidence of podocyte de-differentiation and systemic mediation of glomerulosclerosis. Hum Mol Genet 12: 23792394, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Patek CE, Little MH, Fleming S, Miles C, Charlieu JP, Clarke AR, Miyagawa K, Christie S, Doig J, Harrison DJ, Porteous DJ, Brookes AJ, Hooper ML, and Hastie ND. A zinc finger truncation of murine WT1 results in the characteristic urogenital abnormalities of Denys-Drash syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 29312936, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Pelletier J, Bruening W, Kashtan CE, Mauer SM, Manivel JC, Striegel JE, Houghton DC, Junien C, Habib R, Fouser L, Fine RL, Silverman BL, Haber DA, and Housman D. Germline mutations in the Wilms tumor suppressor gene are associated with abnormal urogenital development in Denys-Drash syndrome. Cell 67: 437447, 1991.[ISI][Medline]
- Pelletier J, Bruening W, Li FP, Haber DA, Glaser T, and Housman DE. WT1 mutations contribute to abnormal genital system development and hereditary Wilms tumor. Nature 353: 431434, 1991.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Pelletier J, Schalling M, Buckler AJ, Rogers A, Haber DA, and Housman D. Expression of the Wilms tumor gene WT1 in the murine urogenital system. Genes Dev 5: 13451356, 1991.[Abstract]
- Pendergrass TW. Congenital anomalies in children with Wilms tumor: a new survey. Cancer 37: 403408, 1976.[ISI][Medline]
- Porteous S, Torban E, Cho NP, Cunliffe H, Chua L, McNoe L, Ward T, Souza C, Gus P, Giugliani R, Sato T, Yun K, Favor J, Sicotte M, Goodyer P, and Eccles M. Primary renal hypoplasia in humans and mice with PAX2 mutations: evidence of increased apoptosis in fetal kidneys of Pax2(1Neu) +/- mutant mice. Hum Mol Genet 9: 111, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Pritchard-Jones K, Fleming S, Davidson D, Bickmore W, Porteous D, Gosden C, Bard J, Buckler A, Pelletier J, Housman D, von Heyningen V, and Hastie N. The candidate Wilms tumor gene is involved in genitourinary development. Nature 346: 194197, 1990.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Rackley RR, Flenniken AM, Kuriyan NP, Kessler PM, Stoler MH, and Williams BR. Expression of the Wilms tumor suppressor gene WT1 during mouse embryogenesis. Cell Growth Differ 4: 10231031, 1993.[Abstract]
- Rauscher FJ III, Morris JF, Tournay OE, Cook DM, and Curran T. Binding of the Wilms tumor locus zinc finger protein to the EGR-1 consensus sequence. Science 250: 12591262, 1990.[ISI][Medline]
- Reddy JC and Licht JD. The WT1 Wilms tumor suppressor gene: how much do we really know? Biochim Biophys Acta 1287: 128, 1996.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Reddy JC, Morris JC, Wang J, English MA, Haber DA, Shi Y, and Licht JD. WT1-mediated transcriptional activation is inhibited by dominant negative mutant proteins. J Biol Chem 270: 1087810884, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Renshaw J, King-Underwood L, and Pritchard-Jones K. Differential splicing of exon 5 of the Wilms tumour (WT1) gene. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 19: 256266, 1997.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Richard DJ, Schumacher V, Royer-Pokora B, and Roberts SG. Par4 is a coactivator for a splice isoform-specific transcriptional activation domain in WT1. Genes Dev 15: 328339, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Sainio K, Hellstedt P, Kreidberg JA, Saxen L, and Sariola H. Differential regulation of two sets of mesonephric tubules by WT-1. Development 124: 12931299, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Sakai A, Tadokoro K, Yanagisawa H, Nagafuchi S, Hoshikawa N, Suzuki T, Kohsaka T, Hasegawa T, Nakahori Y, and Yamada M. A novel mutation of the WT1 gene (a tumor suppressor gene for Wilms tumor) in a patient with Denys-Drash syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 2: 19691970, 1993.[ISI][Medline]
- Scharnhorst V, Dekker P, van der Eb AJ, and Jochemsen AG. Internal translation initiation generates novel WT1 protein isoforms with distinct biological properties. J Biol Chem 274: 2345623462, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Scharnhorst V, Dekker P, van der Eb AJ, and Jochemsen AG. Physical interaction between Wilms tumor 1 and p73 proteins modulates their functions. J Biol Chem 275: 1020210211, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Scharnhorst V, van der Eb AJ, and Jochemsen AG. WT1 proteins: functions in growth and differentiation. Gene 273: 141161, 2001.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Schmale H and Bamberger C. A novel protein with strong homology to the tumor suppressor p53. Oncogene 15: 13631367, 1997.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Sharma PM, Bowman M, Madden SL, Rauscher FJ III, and Sukumar S. RNA editing in the Wilms tumor susceptibility gene, WT1. Genes Dev 8: 720731, 1994.[Abstract]
- Silberstein GB, Van Horn K, Strickland P, Roberts CT Jr, and Daniel CW. Altered expression of the WT1 wilms tumor suppressor gene in human breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 81328137, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Sim EU, Smith A, Szilagi E, Rae F, Ioannou P, Lindsay MH, and Little MH. Wnt-4 regulation by the Wilms tumor suppressor gene, WT1. Oncogene 21: 29482960, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Stanhope-Baker P and Williams BR. Identification of connective tissue growth factor as a target of WT1 transcriptional regulation. J Biol Chem 275: 3813938150, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Ton CC, Hirvonen H, Miwa H, Weil MM, Monaghan P, Jordan T, van Heyningen V, Hastie ND, Meijers-Heijboer H, Drechsler M, Royer-Pokora B, Collins F, Swaroop A, Strong LC, and Saunders GF. Positional cloning and characterization of a paired box- and homeobox-containing gene from the aniridia region. Cell 67: 10591074, 1991.[ISI][Medline]
- Torres M, Gomez-Pardo E, Dressler GR, and Gruss P. Pax-2 controls multiple steps of urogenital development. Development 121: 40574065, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Varanasi R, Bardeesy N, Ghahremani M, Petruzzi MJ, Nowak N, Adam MA, Grundy P, Shows TB, and Pelletier J. Fine structure analysis of the WT1 gene in sporadic Wilms tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 35543558, 1994.[Abstract]
- Wagner KD, Wagner N, Vidal VP, Schley G, Wilhelm D, Schedl A, Englert C, and Scholz H. The Wilms tumor gene Wt1 is required for normal development of the retina. EMBO J 21: 13981405, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Werner H, Hernandez-Sanchez C, Karnieli E, and Leroith D. The regulation of IGF-I receptor gene expression. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 27: 987994, 1995.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Werner H, Shen-Orr Z, Rauscher FJ III, Morris JF, Roberts CT Jr, and LeRoith D. Inhibition of cellular proliferation by the Wilms tumor suppressor WT1 is associated with suppression of insulin-like growth factor I receptor gene expression. Mol Cell Biol 15: 35163522, 1995.[Abstract]
- Wang W, Lee SB, Palmer R, Ellisen LW, and Haber DA. A functional interaction with CBP contributes to transcriptional activation by the Wilms tumor suppressor WT1. J Biol Chem 276: 1681016816, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Wang ZY, Qiu QQ, Enger KT, and Deuel TF. A second transcriptionally active DNA-binding site for the Wilms tumor gene product, WT1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 88968900, 1993.[Abstract]
- Wang ZY, Qiu QQ, Gurrieri M, Huang J, and Deuel TF. WT1, the Wilms tumor suppressor gene product, represses transcription through an interactive nuclear protein. Oncogene 10: 12431247, 1995.[ISI][Medline]
- Wang ZY, Qiu QQ, Huang J, Gurrieri M, and Deuel TF. Products of alternatively spliced transcripts of the Wilms tumor suppressor gene, wt1, have altered DNA binding specificity and regulate transcription in different ways. Oncogene 10: 415422, 1995.[ISI][Medline]
- Wang ZY, Qiu QQ, Seufert W, Taguchi T, Testa JR, Whitmore SA, Callen DF, Welsh D, Shenk T, and Deuel TF. Molecular cloning of the cDNA and chromosome localization of the gene for human ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme 9. J Biol Chem 271: 2481124816, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Wong MA, Cui S, and Quaggin SE. Identification and characterization of a glomerular-specific promoter from the human nephrin gene. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 279: F1027F1032, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Yang A, Schweitzer R, Sun D, Kaghad M, Walker N, Bronson RT, Tabin C, Sharpe S, Caput D, Crum C, and McKeon F. p63 is essential for regenerative proliferation in limb, craniofacial and epithelial development. Nature 398: 714718, 1999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Zhan Q, Chen IT, Antinore MJ, and Fornace AJ Jr. Tumor suppressor p53 can participate in transcriptional induction of the GADD45 promoter in the absence of direct DNA binding. Mol Cell Biol 18: 27682778, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Zhou J, Rauscher FJ III, and Bondy C. Wilms tumor (WT1) gene expression in rat decidual differentiation. Differentiation 54: 109114, 1993.[ISI][Medline]