1Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2Department of Biology, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual de São Paulo (UNESP), Rua 24 A, PO Box 199, Rio Claro, SP, Brazil and 4Cell Dynamics Research Group, Division of Human Life Technology, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Osaka, Japan
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Biology, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual de São Paulo (UNESP), Rua 24 A, 1515, Bela Vista, Rio Claro, SP, 13506-900, Brazil e-mail: viviani{at}rc.unesp.br
![]() |
Abstract |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Keywords: bioluminescence/luciferases/Phrixotrix/railroad worms
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Among all the beetle luciferases, the Phrixotrix railroad worm luciferases are the most spectacular because they are the only ones that naturally emit red light in addition to the usual yellowgreen bioluminescence found in most beetle luciferases. They offer unique models to investigate the relationship between structure and bioluminescence colors, being potentially useful as reporter genes for biotechnological and biomedical purposes. To address the relationship between structure and bioluminescence color in beetle luciferases, we have cloned the cDNAs for Phrixotrix viviani green-emitting (PxvGR) and Phrixotrix hirtus red-emitting (PxhRE) railroad worm luciferases (Viviani et al., 1999a) in addition to other beetle luciferases (Viviani et al., 1999b
; Ohmiya et al., 2000
). Using site-directed mutagenesis and protein chimerization techniques, we found that the region before residue 344 determines the bioluminescence spectrum in railroad worm luciferases (Viviani and Ohmiya, 2000
). We also found that the invariant residue R215 (Viviani and Ohmiya, 2000
) and the conserved T226 in pH-insensitive luciferases (N229 in pH-sensitive luciferases) (Viviani et al., 2001
) are key residues that may interact, keeping a proper active site conformation for green light emission (Viviani et al., 2002
).
To narrow down the region of the luciferase structure determining the bioluminescence spectra, we constructed new luciferase chimeras by combining the fragments before and after residue 220 of P.viviani and P.hirtus railroad worm luciferases and analyzed their effect on the bioluminescence spectra and kinetic properties.
![]() |
Materials and methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), dithiothreitol (DTT), guanidine chloride, ampicillin, Triton X-100, coenzyme-A (CoA) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) were obtained from Sigma (St Louis, MO), D-luciferin (potassium salt) from Promega (Madison, WI), restriction enzymes and Taq polymerase from New England Biolabs (Cambridge, MA) and Sephacryl S-300 from Amersham (Amersham,UK).
cDNAs
The cDNAs for P.hirtus red-emitting luciferase (PxhRE) and P.vivianii green-emitting luciferase (PxvGR) were previously cloned in our laboratories (Viviani et al., 1999a,b). All cDNAs, with the exception of PxhRE, were in the pBluescript vector and propagated in Escherichia coli strain XL1-Blue. PxhRE cDNA was in the expression vector pTHis (Invitrogen) and was propagated in E.coli strain BL21.
Site-directed mutagenesis
Site-directed mutagenesis was performed using a QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The plasmids containing the luciferase cDNAs were amplified using Pfu turbo polymerase and two complementary primers containing the desired mutation, using a thermal cycler (one cycle 95°C; 12 cycles 95°C, 30 s, 55°C, 1 min and 68°C, 12 min). After amplification, mutated plasmids containing staggered nicks were generated. The products were treated with DpnI in order to digest non-mutated parental plasmids and used directly to transform E.coli XL1-Blue cells. The primer PxhRE S220R and its reverse complement was used: 5' CGTCCATAGCAGAGATCCCATCTATGG 3'.
Chimeric luciferases
Luciferase chimeras were constructed according to Figure 1. A BamHI restriction site was inserted through site-directed mutagenesis in pBl-PxhRE to generate pBl-PxhRE-BamHI. The resulting substitution S220R in PxhRE luciferase had no effect on the bioluminescence spectrum. The plasmid pBl-PxvGR has a BamHI restriction site in the corresponding position. The plasmids pBl-PxvGR and pT-PxhRE-BamHI were digested with BamHI and the resulting fragments were ligated generating the chimeras PxRE220GR and PxGR220RE. In order to produce the chimera PxREGRRE, a PstI restriction site was introduced in PxRE220GR generating PxRE220GR-PstI. After digestion of PxhRE and PxRE220GR-PstI with PstI, the fragment of 1.1 kb of PxRE220GR was inserted in the linearized plasmid containing only the 3'-terminal portion of PxhRE.
|
The mutants and chimeras were sequenced by the dideoxy chain termination method (Sambrook et al., 1989) using an ABI PRISM dye terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) specifically developed for the ABI PRISM 377 automatic sequencer (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT). Universal SK and KS primers and the following primers were designed to sequence the constructs and mutations: PxhRE, 5' CCATCTATGGTAATCGTATTGCTCC 3'; PxvGR, 5' CAAGTTTCAGTTAATCCATAT 3'.
Extraction and partial purification of luciferases
For luciferase preparations, 50100 ml of LB culture were grown at 37°C up to OD600 = 0.30.5 and then induced with 1 mM IPTG until OD600 = 1.71.9 at 25°C. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 5000 g for 15 min and resuspended in extraction buffer (0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT and 1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol and protease inhibitor cocktail, pH 7.5), sonicated six times with 10 s pulses and centrifuged at 15 000 g for 15 min at 4°C. The supernatant was precipitated with ammonium sulfate and the precipitate between 55 and 70% was resuspended in extraction buffer and stored at 20°C. PxhRE and PxvGR luciferases were further purified by gel filtration using a Sephacryl S-300 column. The bioluminescence spectra of crude preparations and partially purified luciferases were indistinguishable.
Measurement of luminescence intensities
Bioluminescence intensities were measured in a custom-made photometer (Mitchell and Hastings, 1971). The assays were performed by mixing 5 µl of 40 mM ATP80 mM MgSO4 with a solution consisting of 10 µl of crude extractluciferase and 85 µl of 0.5 mM luciferin in 0.1 M TrisHCl, pH 8.0.
KM determination
For luciferin KM determination, 5 µl of 40 mM ATP80 mM MgSO4 were mixed with a solution consisting of 10 µl of luciferase and 85 µl of 0.1 M TrisHCl buffer, pH 8.0, containing luciferin at concentrations between 0.01 and 1 mM (final concentration). Each assay was performed in triplicate. The KM values were calculated from LineweaverBurk plots using peak initial intensity values (I0) as a measure of V. The half-life of luminescence is the time necessary for the decay of luminescence intensity from the peak to the half-value.
Bioluminescence spectra
Bioluminescence spectra were recorded using a Fluoromax Spex spectrofluorimeter according to Viviani et al. (1999a,b). The emission spectra were autocorrected for instrument photosensitivity. For the in vitro bioluminescence, 50100 µl of crude extracts were mixed with 900950 µl of assay solution (0.5 mM luciferin, 2 mM ATP, 4 mM MgSO4, 0.5 mM CoA and 1% Triton X-100 in 0.1 M TrisHCl, pH 8.0).
Western blotting
In order to check the expression of wild-type and chimeric luciferases, SDSPAGE followed by western blotting were performed. Crude extracts were filtered using Microcon 100 kDa molecular weight cut-off filters and concentrated using 50 kDa cut-off filters. The denatured samples were then applied to SDS gels and electroblotted on to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were first incubated with firefly luciferase polyclonal primary antibody (dilution: 1:3000) and then with anti-rabbit horeseradish peroxidase (HRP) labeled secondary antibody (dilution: 1:5000) and revealed by chemiluminescence using an ECL western blotting kit (Amersham) according to the manufacturers instructions.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Previously, we found through the construction of the chimeras PxREGR and PxGRRE that the region before residue 344 determines the bioluminescence spectra in railroad worm luciferases (Viviani and Ohmiya, 2000). The KM for luciferin and the kinetic profiles of these chimeras, reported here, are closer to the values observed for the luciferase which contributed the region 1344 (Table I), suggesting that the region before residue 344 also has a major influence on the structure of the active site and hence the bioluminescence color.
|
|
Impact of the fragments above residue 220 of PxhRE on the luciferase activity
It is noteworthy that the PxGR220RE and PxGRREGR chimeric luciferases were found to be inactive for light emission. Since the wild-type and chimeric luciferases expressed similar levels of protein, as can be seen by western blotting (Figure 1), these results suggest that the absence of bioluminescence is due to severe impairment of luciferase activity.
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Considering that the region above residue 220 has a significant effect on the emission spectrum of PxRE220GR whereas the region beyond 344 has no effect on the emission spectra of railroad worm luciferases, it is remarkable that the region 220344 does not have a major influence. Furthermore, the lack of activity of the chimeras containing the fragments above residue 220 of PxhRE luciferase is also noteworthy. These results suggest that there could be considerable differences in the relative conformation assumed by the fragments before and above residue 220 in the green- and red-emitting luciferases.
In the three-dimensional structure of firefly luciferase, the region corresponding to residues 221352 of railroad worm luciferases corresponds to the sub-domain B (Conti et al., 1996). Many important residues affecting bioluminescence color and activity in firefly luciferases, including the putative luciferin binding peptide 244HHGF247 (Branchini et al., 1998
), are found in this sub-domain. In click beetle luciferases, the sequence between residues 223 and 247 was found to be the main determinant of bioluminescence colors in those luciferases (Wood et al., 1990
). Therefore, subdomain B could be considered as a surface containing important residues and motifs interacting with excited oxyluciferin. The regions corresponding to residues 70220 and 355436 correspond to subdomains A and C, respectively. Important residues are also found in the subdomains A, C, D and E of firefly luciferases. The luciferin binding site was suggested to be located in a depression formed by the packing of subdomain B against the subdomains A and C. The proper packing of these sub-domains must be critical for the active site formation, by positioning key residues and creating a favorable microenvironment for bioluminescence. In the green-emitting luciferase, the conformation assumed by the fragment 220344 or some of its motifs in relation to other sub-domains could be considerably different from that of the red-emitting luciferase. In the chimera PxREGRRE the fragment 220344 of the green-emitting luciferase evidently assumes a similar configuration to that found in the wild-type PxhRE red-emitting luciferase. However, in the chimeras PxGR220RE and PxGRREGR the fragments above residue 220 of the red-emitting luciferase could not be properly folding with the sub-domains of the green emitting luciferase, resulting in impairment of bioluminescent activity. Recently, Zako et al. (2003
) showed that firefly luciferase retains a basal activity and emits red light on removal of the C-terminal domain, indicating that the C-terminal domain is somehow recruited for efficient green light emission. The three-dimensional structure of acetyl-CoA synthetase also suggests that the rotation of the C-terminal domain upon CoA binding might be an important step for the second half-reaction catalyzed by AMP-ligases, i.e. the oxidation step in beetle luciferases. Overall, these results are consistent with major structural rearrangements between the green- and red-emitting luciferases.
![]() |
Acknowledgements |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Branchini,B.R., Magyar,R.A., Murtishaw,M.H. and Portier,N.C. (2001) Biochemistry, 40, 24102418.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Branchini,B.R., Murtiashaw,M.H., Magyar,R.A., Portier,N.C., Ruggiero,M.C. and Stroh,J.G. (2002) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 124, 21122113.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Conti,E., Franks,N.P. and Brick,P. (1996) Structure, 4, 287298.[ISI][Medline]
Conti,E., Stachelhaus,T., Marahiel,M.A. and Brick,P. (1997) EMBO J., 16, 41744183.
DeLuca,M. (1969) Biochemistry, 8, 160166.[ISI][Medline]
Kajiyama,N. and Nakano,E. (1991) Protein Eng., 4, 691693.[ISI][Medline]
Mamaev,S.V., Laikhter,A.L., Arslan,T. and Hecht,S.M. (1996) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 118, 72437244.[CrossRef][ISI]
McCapra,F., Gilfoyle,D.J., Young,D.W., Church,N.J. and Spencer,P. (1994) In Campbell,A.K., Kricka,L.J. and Stanley,P.E. (eds), Bioluminescence and Chemiluminescence: Fundamental and Applied Aspects. Wiley, Chichester, pp. 387391.
Mitchell,G. and Hastings,J.W. (1971) Anal. Biochem., 39, 243250.[ISI][Medline]
Ohmiya,Y, Hirano,T. and Ohashi,M. (1996) FEBS Lett., 384, 8386.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Ohmiya,Y., Mina,S., Viviani,V.R. and Ohba,N. (2000) Sci. Rep. Yokosuka City Mus., 47, 3138.
Sambrook,J., Fritsch,E.F. and Maniatis,T. (1989) Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
Sandalova,T.P. and Ugarova,N.N. (1999) Biochemistry (Mosc.), 64, 962967.[ISI][Medline]
Seliger,H.H. and McElroy,W.D. (1964) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 52, 7581.[ISI]
Ugarova,N.N. and Brovko,L.Y. (2002) Luminescence, 17, 321330.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Viviani,V.R. (2002) Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 59, 18331850.[ISI][Medline]
Viviani,V.R. and Bechara,E.J.H. (1995) Photochem. Photobiol., 62, 490495.[ISI]
Viviani,V.R. and Ohmiya,Y. (2000) Photochem. Photobiol., 72, 267271.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Viviani,V.R., Bechara,E.J.H. and Ohmiya,Y. (1999a) Biochemistry, 38, 82718279.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Viviani,V.R., Silva A.C.R., Perez G.L., Santelli,R.V., Bechara E.J.H. and Reinach F.C. (1999b) Photochem. Photobiol., 70, 254260.[ISI][Medline]
Viviani,V.R., Uchida,A., Suenaga,N., Ryufuku,M. and Ohmiya,Y. (2001) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 280, 12861291.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Viviani,V.R., Uchida,A., Viviani,W. and Ohmiya,Y. (2002) Photochem. Photobiol., 76, 538544.[ISI][Medline]
White,E.H. and Branchini,B. (1975) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 97, 12431245.[ISI][Medline]
Willey,T.L., Squirrel,D.J. and White,P.J. (2001) In Case,J.F., Herring,P.J., Robinson,B.H., Haddock,S.D.H, Kricka,L.J. and Stanley,P.E. (eds), Bioluminescence and Chemiluminescence. Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Bioluminescence and Chemiluminescence. World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 201204.
Wood,K.W. (1990) J. Biolum. Chemilum., 5, 107114.[ISI]
Wood,K.W., Lam,Y.A., Seliger,H.H. and McElroy,W.D. (1989) Science, 244, 700702.[ISI][Medline]
Zako,T., Ayabe,K., Aburatani,T., Kamiya,N., Kitayama,A., Ueda,H. and Nagamune,T. (2003) Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1649, 183189.[ISI][Medline]
Received January 24, 2003; revised November 24, 2003; accepted November 28, 2003 Edited by Alan Fersht
|