Fibrate treatment can increase serum creatinine levels

V. Tsimihodimos, A. Kakafika and M. Elisaf

Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, University of Ioannina Medical School, Ioannina, Greece

Sir,

We read with great interest the recently published article by Broeders et al. with regard to the fibrate-induced increase in blood urea and creatinine [1]. Taking into account these findings, we retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients treated with fibrates, in the lipid clinic of our university hospital. In the study we included patients without any evidence of renal dysfunction, not receiving nephrotoxic agents or drugs that could affect renal function (such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor antagonists, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aminoglycosides etc), with available serum urea and creatinine levels before and after treatment with fibrates.

Interestingly, in accordance to the results of Broeders et al. a significant increase in serum creatinine levels was observed after ciprofibrate and fenofibrate administration (Table 1Go). In addition, similar elevations were observed in serum urea levels after the administration of both drugs (by 17% and 8%, respectively). These increases in serum urea and creatinine levels were evident at the patients' first visit (after a mean period of 6 weeks of therapy) and remained unchanged or slightly elevated during a follow-up period of 8 months (3–18 months). However, as shown in Table 1Go, no significant change in serum creatinine levels was observed after gemfibrozil administration.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Effect of fibrates on serum creatinine levels (expressed in mg/dl)

 
One possible explanation for these diverse effects of fibric acid derivatives could be the hypothesis that fibrates, such as fenofibrate, ciprofibrate and bezafibrate, impair the generation of vasodilatory prostaglandins, probably because of the activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), which can down-regulate the expression of the inducible COX-2 enzyme [24]. Gemfibrozil, in contrast to the other fibrates, fails to bind and activate PPARs, which may account for the absence of nephrotoxicity observed [5].

We conclude that fibrates, possibly with the exception of gemfibrozil, can cause a small though significant increase in serum creatinine levels, which should be taken into account, especially in patients with underlying renal disease or in patients also receiving drugs that may affect renal function, such as kidney transplant recipients.

References

  1. Broeders N, Knoop C, Antoine M, Tielemans C, Abramowicz D. Fibrate-induced increase in blood urea and creatinine: is gemfibrozil the only innocuous agent? Nephrol Dial Transplant2000; 15: 1993–1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Wilson MW, Lay LT, Chow CK, Tai H, Robertson LW, Glauert HP. Altered hepatic eicosanoid concentrations in rats treated with the peroxisome proliferators ciprofibrate and perfluorodecanoic acid. Arch Toxicol1995; 69: 491–497[ISI][Medline]
  3. Ledwith BJ, Pauley CJ, Wagner LK, Rokos CL, Alberts DW, Manam S. Induction of cyclooxygenase-2 expression by peroxisome proliferators and non-tetradecanoylphorbol 12, 13-myristate-type tumor promoters in immortalized mouse liver cells. J Biol Chem1997; 272: 3707–3714[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Krey G, Braissant O, L'Horset F et al. Fatty acids, eicosanoids, and hypolipidemic agents identified as ligands of peroxisome proliferators by coactivator-dependent receptor ligand assay. Mol Endocrinol1999; 11: 779–791[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Yoshinari M, Asano T, Kaori S et al. Effect of gemfibrozil on serum levels of prostacyclin and precursor fatty acids in hyperlipidemic patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract1998; 42: 149–154[ISI][Medline]