1 Department of Oral Biochemistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry, Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit and Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 2 Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, 3 Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Amsterdam, 4 Department of Internal Medicine, Rode Kruis Hospital, The Hague, 5 Stichting DIANET Dialysis Centres, Utrecht, 6 Stichting DIANET Dialysis Centres, Amsterdam and 7 Department of Nephrology, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Correspondence and offprint requests to: Casper Bots, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: c.bots{at}vumc.nl
![]() |
Abstract |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Methods. This study was a randomized two-treatment crossover design with repeated measures. After the use of chewing gum or saliva substitute for 2 weeks, a wash-out period of 2 weeks was introduced and hereafter the other regimen was carried out. Xerostomia and thirst were assessed by validated questionnaires as xerostomia inventory (XI) and dialysis thirst inventory (DTI), at baseline and after each treatment period, as were IWG and salivary flow rates.
Results. Sixty-five HD patients (42 men, 54.6±14.1 years; 23 women, 54.7±16.3 years) participated in this study. Chewing gum decreased XI from 29.9±9.5 to 28.1±9.1 (P<0.05). Chewing gum as well as a saliva substitute reduced DTI significantly (P<0.05), but no differences occurred for the average IWG or salivary flow rates.
Conclusions. The use of chewing gum and, to a lesser extent, a saliva substitute may alleviate thirst and xerostomia in some HD patients.
Keywords: chewing gum; haemodialysis; interdialytic weight gain; saliva substitute; thirst; xerostomia
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Several strategies have been advocated to reduce fluid intake and IWG in HD patients, such as the administration of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, dietary measures or, ultimately, increasing the frequency of HD sessions [3]. In 25 chronic HD patients with fluid overload, enalapril (an ACE inhibitor) modestly decreased IWG from 0.90 to 0.73 kg per day. Dietary measures, such as the restriction of sodium intake or reducing high protein intake, have shown to be effective in reducing IWG in HD patients. However, compliance to the fluid restriction is also influenced by other factors, such as hormonal derangements, social and psychological changes, thirst and xerostomia. Xerostomia is a symptom, defined as the subjective feeling of a dry mouth [4]. Hyposalivation, on the other hand, is the objective measured reduction in salivary flow rate. The prevalence of both hyposalivation and xerostomia is higher in HD patients than in healthy controls [5,6]. Patients with xerostomia report increased water consumption to facilitate eating and speech.
Recently, we demonstrated that xerostomia in HD patients was positively associated with IWG and thirst, and, therefore, could play a role as a stimulus for fluid intake between dialysis sessions [4]. Besides an effect on fluid intake, oral dryness also has an impact on the oral health and on the quality of life of the xerostomic patients.
Xerostomia can potentially be improved by mechanical and gustatory stimulation of the salivary glands or by palliative care, such as saliva substitutes [7]. In a pilot study with seven non-compliant HD patients, the use of a saliva substitute reduced the number of dialysis sessions with a high IWG [8]. This suggests that saliva substitutes or stimulants could potentially be used to decrease xerostomia and, thus, the urge to drink in HD patients. This may increase compliance to the fluid-restricted diet and could, subsequently, result in a decreased IWG and an improved quality of life.
The aim of this clinical crossover trial was to investigate the potential effect of the use of sugar-free chewing gum and a saliva substitute on xerostomia, thirst and IWG in ESRD patients on HD.
![]() |
Subjects and methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
During the 6 week crossover trial, the patients randomly received either chewing gum or the saliva substitute regimen. After a wash-out period of 2 weeks, to control for any crossover effect between products, the other regimen (chewing gum or saliva substitute) was tested.
The low-tack, menthol-containing sugar-free chewing gum used was Freedent WhiteTM (Wm Wrigley Jr Co., Chicago, IL, USA), sweetened with xylitol and sorbitol. To get optimal patient compliance, two flavours of this chewing gum were selected (Sweetmint® and Winterfresh®) and offered to the patients [9]. The participants were instructed to chew one or two pieces of gum gently, for 10 min, six times a day and as desired throughout the day when the mouth felt dry or when they were thirsty.
The saliva substitute used in this study was XialineTM (Lommerse Pharma B.V., Oss, The Netherlands), which contains 0.92% xanthan gum and 2 p.p.m. sodium fluoride. Two bottles (each with 50 ml artificial saliva) were offered to the participants, who were instructed to use the spray at least six times a day and as desired throughout the day when the mouth felt dry or when they were thirsty.
Age, gender, ethnic background, denture wearing, smoking habits and use of alcohol were assessed with a questionnaire. The causes for the ESRD were classified according to the European Renal AssociationEuropean Dialysis and Transplantation Association. Clinical data at baseline, such as systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressures (DBP), normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR) and weekly removal of urea by dialysis (Kt/Vweek) were retrieved from patient files.
Xerostomia, thirst and KDQOL
At baseline and at the beginning and end of each experimental period, the main parameters xerostomia, thirst, IWG and salivary flow rates were determined. The Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOL) was assessed at baseline of the trial to compare the study population with a reference population.
The xerostomia inventory (XI) was used to quantify the perceived xerostomia. The XI is a validated questionnaire with 11 items, each with a 5 point Likert-type scale (never = 1 to very often = 5). The scores are summed and provide an individual XI score ranging from 11 (no dry mouth) to 55 (extremely dry mouth) [4,10].
Thirst was assessed by using a shortened version of the dialysis thirst inventory (DTI), quantifying the occurrence of thirst before, during and after dialysis, and perceived thirst during day and night [4]. Each item has a 5 point Likert-type scale (never = 1 to very often = 5). The responses to the five items were summed, which results in a score ranging from 5 (never thirsty) to 25 (very often thirsty).
KDQOL was measured using the short version of the validated KDQOLSFTM based on 36 items that focus on health-related concerns of individuals with kidney disease on HD [11]. These items are assigned to three kidney disease-related dimensions and to two generic dimensions: (a) symptom problem list; (b) effects of kidney disease; (c) burden of kidney disease; (d) SF-12 physical health; and (e) SF-12 mental health. The item scores were aggregated without weighting and transformed linearly to a 0100 range, with higher scores indicating better states.
Interdialytic weight gain
Patients were weighed before and after each dialysis session. IWG was defined as the amount of fluid (kg) removed during the session (weight pre-dialysis minus weight post-dialysis) with the assumption that all the weight gained in the previous interdialytic interval had been lost during the dialysis session. The IWG was calculated and expressed as the mean IWG during a period of 2 weeks [4].
Saliva collection
Unstimulated whole saliva (UWS) and paraffin chewing-stimulated whole saliva (PC-SWS) were both collected before dialysis. All subjects were instructed to refrain from smoking, eating, drinking and tooth brushing for 1 h prior to saliva collection. UWS was collected according to the spitting method, with some small modifications [4]. Before collection, the subjects rinsed their mouth with tap water. The collection started with the instruction to void the mouth of saliva by swallowing. Saliva was allowed to accumulate on the floor of the mouth and the subjects were instructed to spit into pre-weighted test tubes every 30 s. The saliva collection period was 5 min.
PC-SWS was collected for 5 min using a tasteless piece of parafilm (5 x 5 cm, 0.30 g; Parafilm M; American National CAL, Chicago, IL, USA). The chewing-stimulated saliva was also spitted out into pre-weighed test tubes every 30 s for 5 min. During the saliva collection period, the subjects chewed at their natural pace. Saliva volumes were determined gravimetrically (assuming 1 g = 1 ml).
Statistical methods
The data at baseline were stratified with regard to gender, age (64 and >64 years), residual urine output (yes/no) and full denture (yes/no) and analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). The period effect and the influence of the order in which the subjects received the therapy (treatmentperiod interaction) were investigated with two-sample t-tests. Since no treatmentperiod interaction was found, we compared the effect of each therapy (chewing gum and saliva substitute) with the main baseline variables using the general linear model of ANOVA (repeated measures design, followed by paired t-tests as post-hoc procedure). To explore the effect of gender, age, residual urine output and full denture, these variables were inputted separately in the model as between-subject factors. The data of the five dimensions of the KDQOLSFTM were compared with the reference population using paired t-tests. The statistical analysis was performed using the statistical software package SPSS (version 10.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All data are presented as means±SD and levels of significance were set at P<0.05.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
In patients with hyposalivation (UWS 0.16 ml/min), an overall treatment effect was found on the XI scores. Gum chewing reduced the XI scores significantly from 33.2±9.1 to 29.7±8.4 (P<0.05; Table 5). During both treatment modalities, the DTI levels were comparable between both groups (Table 5) and no overall treatment effect was found. Patients with hyposalivation and those with normal salivary flow rates did not differ with respect to the IWG. Also, the treatment did not have an effect on the IWG.
In a subgroup of HD patients (n = 12) without residual urine output, suffering from thirst (DTI = 1625) and hyposalivation (UWS 0.16 ml/min), the highest mean XI-values were observed. A significant reduction of the XI score was observed after the use of chewing gum for 2 weeks (from 37.8±7.2 to 32.6±6.6). The use of a saliva substitute, however, did not affect the XI score. In this subgroup, no treatment effects were found for the level of thirst (DTI) and IWG (data not shown).
Saliva secretion: at baseline and therapy effect
UWS and PC-SWS flow rates showed a skewed distribution and were square-root transformed before statistical analyses. For clarity, the untransformed data are presented. At baseline, the mean UWS was 0.26±0.15 ml/min (median: 0.24 ml/min; range: 0.011.80 ml/min). The mean PC-SWS was 0.89± 0.44 ml/min (median: 0.82 ml/min; range: 0.18 3.78 ml/min). Treatment with chewing gum or the saliva substitute did not influence UWS and PC-SWS (Table 4).
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
This study is the first large-scale clinical crossover study to investigate the effect of chewing gum and a saliva substitute on xerostomia (XI), thirst (DTI) and IWG in patients on HD. Overall, the use of chewing gum for 2 weeks among HD patients significantly reduced both thirst and xerostomia. This is in agreement with other studies that investigated the effect of chewing gum on xerostomia in other patient populations, such as rheumatic patients [15] or in patients with a malignant disease [16]. Besides the role of oral dryness, other elements, such as sodium intake, high plasma sodium, potassium depletion, angiotensin-II levels, rapid increases in plasma urea and psychological factors, are involved in the multicomplexity of thirst and fluid intake among HD patients [4,13,17,18].
In this study the use of a saliva substitute by HD patients reduced perceived thirst but had no effect on xerostomia. In the literature, conflicting data about the efficacy of saliva substitutes have been presented. In 30 patients with radiation-induced xerostomia, feelings of a dry mouth decreased after the use of a saliva substitute. However, other studies failed to show a substantial effect of saliva substitutes after radiation therapy or in patients with Sjögren's syndrome [7,19].
Although the effect of the therapy on the XI and DTI scores was modest, the majority of patients (72.3%) rated chewing gum as a beneficial therapy. Chewing gum was also rated best with respect to effectiveness, ease of use and taste compared with the saliva substitute (data not shown). Therefore, chewing gum seems preferable in the reduction of oral dryness and thirst among HD patients.
The mean salivary flow rates were normal and comparable, both to reference values for healthy individuals and to other studies in HD patients [14]. In general, patients with severe hyposalivation respond best on saliva substitutes [7]. This is in contrast to our study, in which gum chewing reduced xerostomia best in the subgroup with hyposalivation (UWS 0.16 ml/min). The most plausible reason is that xerostomia and hyposalivation in other investigations is of different origin [7,19,20]. Since it is likely that salivary glands are not affected by the HD treatment [4], mechanical or gustatory activation by chewing is still possible, in contrast to patients suffering from severe Sjögren's syndrome.
Previously, we have shown that thirst is significantly related to IWG [4]. Compliance to the fluid-restricted diet (500 ml/day) was measured by IWG. Although gum chewing and spraying with saliva substitute significantly reduced thirst, the IWG in HD patients was not affected. Several patients indicated that chewing and spraying had a distracting effect and resulted in postponing fluid intake; however, the net fluid intake remained the same in the study period. This might be explained by the patients knowing how much weight they are allowed to gain between dialysis sessions and, thus, how much they can drink, although no thirst is present. It might also be possible that a 2 week period is too short to affect the fluid intake and, thus, the IWG. The contribution of fluid intake due to the use of artificial saliva was negligible, since the average volume of artificial saliva used did not exceed 7 ml/day.
A potential limitation of this study is the lack of blinding. However, this is unavoidable in this crossover design in which the participant received two potential active agents (chewing gum and saliva substitute).
In conclusion, this crossover clinical trial shows that a saliva-stimulating agent (chewing gum) and a saliva substitute both induced a modest reduction in the level of thirst (DTI) in HD patients. The level of xerostomia (XI) was reduced after the use of chewing gum. However, no evidence of reduced fluid intake or weight gain could be obtained. HD patients younger than 65 years without residual urine output have to deal most with thirst and xerostomia, and could therefore benefit from chewing gum or artificial saliva. We conclude that the use of chewing gum, and to a lesser extent a saliva substitute, may alleviate thirst and xerostomia in some HD patients on a fluid-restricted diet and, thus, should be considered as a clinical tool to assist HD patients in adhering to the fluid-restricted diet.
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|