1 Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich and 2 Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Inselspital, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
Correspondence and offprint requests to: Professor Felix J. Frey, Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Inselspital Berne, University of Berne, 3010 Berne, Switzerland Email: felix.frey{at}insel.ch
Keywords: cyclosporine; everolimus; nephrotoxicity; rapamycin; renal allograft; sirolimus
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The macrocyclic lactone rapamycin or sirolimus (Rapamune®) and its more polar derivative everolimus (Certican®) exhibit a similar mode of action but a different pharmacokinetic behaviour. Everolimus shows a shorter elimination half-life (30 vs 60 h) and a higher bioavailability [4,5].
In the absence of concomitant use of CNI, rapamycin was shown repeatedly to spare renal function. To the surprise of the transplant community, evidence for rapamycin-associated nephrotoxicity has been accumulating in the last few years. In line with such observations, Crew et al. [6] describe two patients with thrombotic microangiopathy as a result of rapamycin exposure and suggest potential mechanisms of the disorder in this edition of NDT. Thus, definitely, the question has to be addressed whether nephrotoxicity of rapamycin represents a relevant problem in clinical practice.
![]() |
Evidence of rapamycin nephrotoxicity in kidney transplantation |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In a prospective study, high-risk renal allograft recipients (79% African-Americans, 59% delayed graft function, high proportion of marginal kidneys) were randomized to receive, following thymoglobulin induction, either standard tacrolimus (1015 ng/ml) plus reduced sirolimus (510 ng/ml; group I, n = 16) or reduced tacrolimus (510 ng/ml) plus standard sirolimus (1015 ng/ml; group II, n = 23) [8]. Although the outcome at 6 months was identical between the two groups, 38% of patients from group I needed discontinuation of tacrolimus due to biopsy-proven tacrolimus nephrotoxicity. Therefore, a reduced quality of the grafts may render them more susceptible to nephrotoxicity of this drug combination.
Furthermore, two cases of acute oliguric renal allograft failure due to suspected acute tubular necrosis (one case biopsy-confirmed) associated with the combined use of tacrolimus and sirolimus were described [9].
In a recent retrospective analysis, the influence of immunosuppression on delayed graft function (DGF) was investigated in 144 kidney transplant patients treated with tacrolimus with or without rapamycin [1]. DGF occurred almost three times more often in subjects treated with rapamycin than without (25% vs 8.9%), and was correlated positively with drug dose (odds ratio: 1.1 per mg). In addition, a subset of rapamycin-treated patients developed cast nephropathy, reminiscent of myeloma cast nephropathy. These observations are in line with the results from another retrospective clinical study examining 132 renal allograft recipients who developed DFG (23.4%) from a total of 563 adults [10]. Recipients of sirolimus were half as likely to resolve DGF or twice as likely to remain on dialysis as subjects without this agent [10].
In a recent 12 month analysis of 634 cyclosporin-treated heart transplant patients, the concurrent administration of everolimus and cyclosporin led to a significant increase in serum creatinine levels beginning on day 28, as compared with the use of azathioprine [11]. Importantly, cyclosporin drug concentrations were not different among the different groups.
Thus, in patients with an allograft, the combination of a CNI (cyclosporine) and sirolimus/everolimus is definitely associated with higher serum creatinine concentrations than a CNI combined with the other immunosuppressive agents.
![]() |
Nephrotoxicity of rapamycin in glomerulonephritis |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In addition, a recent investigation described four patients with chronic allograft dysfunction who developed biopsy-confirmed post-transplantation GN with nephrotic-range proteinuria 29 months after conversion of a CNI-containing regimen to rapamycin [13]. Stabilization of kidney function and complete remission of proteinuria occurred in all cases after reintroduction of CNI.
![]() |
Mechanisms of rapamycin-associated nephrotoxicity |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Sirolimus and everolimus bind to FKBP12 and inhibit mTOR, later identified as FRAP kinase [4], a key regulator of cell proliferation, growth, apoptosis and survival in response to growth factors and cytokines [1,4,14]. FRAP kinase belongs to the phosphatidylinositol kinases, crucial for the progression of the cell cycle from G1 to S phase by signalling through the p70 S6 kinase and eIF4E-binding protein [4].
Rapamycin exposure leads primarily to cell-cycle arrest in the early G1 phase of T and B lymphocytes [4,10]. Following transplantation, rapamycin prevents acute rejection by inhibition of cytokine and growth factor-mediated lymphocyte proliferation, especially the proliferation and clonal expansion of interleukin-2-stimulated T lymphocytes [15]. Importantly, other cells are also a direct target of this drug, including endothelial, smooth muscle, mesangial and renal tubular cells [1,12,16]. Furthermore, rapamycin may promote the default way of apoptosis by inhibiting the activity of survival factors and of p70 S6 kinase [15,17].
Importantly, rapamycin inhibits growth factor-induced proliferation of cultured proximal tubular cells and supports their apoptosis by blocking the survival effects of the same growth factors [15]. Accordingly, rapamycin impaired recovery from experimental acute renal failure induced by renal artery occlusion due to the combined effects of increased tubular cell loss (apoptosis) and inhibition of regenerative proliferation [15]. These effects were attributable to the inhibition of p70 S6 kinase [15].
In addition, rats given rapamycin (3 mg/kg/p.o.) for 2 weeks on a low-salt diet developed magnesium wasting and structural renal lesions consisting of tubular collapse, vacuolization and nephrocalcinosis [18].
Thus, during periods of renal allograft injury, rapamycin may be harmful due to its negative effects on tubular cell regeneration and survival [1,15].
The same may be true at the glomerular level in inflammatory states that require intact cell proliferation for repair and/or compensatory mechanisms [12]. In addition, rapamycin may potentiate tubular toxicity of proteinuria per se [12].
Toxicity of rapamycin, indeed, depends upon the type of GN, as first reported by our group in experimental GN models [19]. We demonstrated that everolimus highly accentuated acute mesangial proliferative anti-Thy1.1 nephritis, reflected by severe glomerular destruction with areas of necrosis, kidney failure and increased proteinuria. In contrast, a significant reduction of proteinuria was achieved as a result of everolimus exposure in the non-proliferative acute puromycin aminonucleoside nephrosis [19]. In addition to the antiproliferative effect, everolimus also inhibits mesangial cell migration, mediated by preventing the decrease in the CDK-inhibitor p27 KIP1 induced by growth factors [20]. In this respect, particular caution may be warranted for the use of rapamycin in antibody-mediated forms of proliferative GN.
Pharmacokinetic and possibly also pharmacodynamic interactions of CNI and sirolimus are another potential mechanism of nephrotoxicity. Because of the shared metabolism by the P-450 (CYP) 3A4 and competition for the extrusion by the p-glycoprotein mechanism, blood and tissue levels of both cyclosporin and rapamycin can be increased if administered concurrently [1,7,2124]. Possibly, the same is true for the tacrolimus and rapamycin combination with respect to an intracellular accumulation resulting in direct tissue injury [1,8,12,25]. However, unlike the cyclosporin/sirolimus combination, sirolimus/tacrolimus pharmacokinetics appears to remain essentially unchanged following their simultaneous administration [23,24].
In addition, a possible potentiation of CNI nephrotoxicity by sirolimus or everolimus per se unrelated to changes in drug levels was proposed also [11]. This may be especially true in cases of tissue regeneration following injury.
![]() |
Conclusions |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
This might explain why renal function deteriorates in patients with kidneys in the process of repairing tubular cells (delayed graft function and acute tubular necrosis), endothelial cells (thrombotic microangiopathy and GN) or mesangial cells (GN).
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
Conflict of interest statement. Both authors are supported by the companies Novartis Pharma AG, Switzerland and Wyeth, USA. [See related article by Crew et al. (this issue pp. 203209)]
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|