1 Department of Pathology and 2 Department of Internal Medicine, Ruperto Carola University, Heidelberg, Germany and 3 Hôpital Manhes, Fleury Mérogis, France
Correspondence and offprint requests to: E. Ritz, Sektion Nephrologie, Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Bergheimer Strasse 56a, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany.
Introduction
For decades, it has been known that patients with end-stage renal failure have an excessive coronary and cardiac risk. There is also widespread consensus that coronary atherosclerosis and its complications are not fully explained by classical risk factors, e.g. dyslipidaemia, elevated homocysteine concentrations, hypertension, insulin resistance, high fibrinogen etc.
Studies on uraemia spring many surprises. In an early investigation, the paradoxical finding had been made [1] that high cholesterol concentrations are predictive of better survival. This observation subsequently has been confirmed [2] and the paradox is presumably explained by the fact that high cholesterol is a surrogate marker for adequate nutrition. Conversely, malnutrition turned out to be highly predictive of death including cardiac death [3].
Block et al. [4] sprang another surprise on the nephrological community when they found that hyperphosphataemia predicted reduced survival. This was accounted for by an excess of cardiac death. This observation has been confirmed and extended recently [5].
In the following, we discuss several possibilities of how elevated serum phosphate concentration may aggravate the cardiac risk and the impact that those observations will have on patient management.
Hyperphosphataemia and coronary plaques
Coronary plaques are not static lesions, but highly dynamic structures. They are initiated by injury to or dysfunction of the endothelial cell layer, migration of activated monocytes and local interaction with proliferating vascular smooth muscle cells. This sequence of injury and repair may occur on multiple occasions. The final outcome, i.e. stabilization or rupture with coronary thrombosis, will depend on the interplay between collagen fibre deposition (fibrous cap) on the one hand and proteolytic activity, released by activated macrophages and vascular smooth muscle cells, on the other hand [6]. Calcification is a feature of an advanced stage of plaque transformation. Recently, non-invasive technology, based on fast electron computed tomography (CT) led to the recognition that the number and the extension of calcified plaques [7] is a highly sensitive indicator of coronary atherosclerosis. The specificity of the lesions detected by fast electron CT is shown by the fact that they respond to interventions such as administration of statins [8]. Necrotic cores of plaques are known to calcify easily. This is accompanied by expression of genes which potentially play a role in calcium metabolism, e.g. osteopontin and osteocalcin, raising interesting issues about the mechanisms, direct or indirect, through which hyperphosphataemia promotes calcification. Autopsy studies [9] and clinical observations using electron-beam CT [10] showed a high prevalence of rapidly progressing calcified coronary plaques in uraemic patients. These findings with imaging procedures are supported by our own observations [11]. Figure 1 shows the heart of an uraemic patient with heavy calcification of the aortic valve and the aorta ascendens. Figure 2
shows a characteristic calcified coronary artery of an uraemic patient. Figure 3
shows the histology of a calcified coronary plaque. When comparing coronary plaques in 27 uraemic and 27 non-uraemic patients, the proportion of calcified plaques was 67 and 18%, respectively. Obviously, apart from the known adverse effects of hyperphosphlataemia on calcification of the aortic valves (Figure 1
) and the mitral annulus [12], calcification of coronary plaques induced by hyperphosphataemia may also aggravate the cardiac risk of dialysed patients. Before one accepts this proposal as the explanation for the above epidemiological findings [4,5], one has, however, to exclude several confounding factors.
|
|
|
Hyperphosphataemia may well be a surrogate marker of suboptimal dialysis. Conversely, more intense dialysis treatment, particularly more frequent dialysis sessions, lowers phosphate in a dramatic fashion, so that some patients may even develop hypophosphataemia [13]. Inadequate dialysis (underdialysis) may promote cardiac death by mechanisms other than hyperphosphataemia such as hypervolaemia, poor control of blood pressure, malnutrition etc.
Hyperphosphataemia may act per se or via excessive secretion of parathyroid hormone (PTH), in other words, some of the cardiac effects of hyperphosphataemia may be indirect [14,15]. This consideration would give another twist to the proposal of Massry that PTH is a potential cardiac and vascular `toxin' [16]. A direct effect is a plausible possibility, however, in view of the observation that serum phosphate is correlated to angiographic levels of coronary disease and coronary occlusion in non renal patients [17]. In the past, we had studied a model of renal failure, i.e. the subtotally nephrectomized rat, and found that parathyroidectomy prevented, and infusion of the rat 134 N-terminal PTH fragment restored activation of interstitial cells [18] and thickening of the wall of cardiac arterioles [19]. Recently, we studied interstitial fibrosis and arteriolar wall thickness in the heart and noted striking differences between subtotally nephrectomized animals put on low phosphate compared with high phosphate diet [20]; currently, we cannot exclude the possiblity that this finding is explained by differences in PTH.
In summary, hyperphosphataemia may adversely affect cardiac prognosis, first by modifying coronary plaque morphology, but, second, also by affecting the structure of the heart including the microvasculature. This would add an element of post-coronary microvascular disease with obvious repercussions on ischaemia tolerance [11]. These direct effects on the heart may be complemented by hyperphosphataemia-induced alterations in the elastic arteries, as suggested by the observation of London reported in this issue [21]. Since diminished aortic elasticity imposes greater work load upon the heart of the uraemic patient [22], it will be very important to provide further support for the preliminary findings in his cross-sectional observational study.
Clinical implications
Where does all this leave us today?
As discussed above, it remains unclear whether phosphate is injurious per se or whether the adverse effect is mediated via PTH. At any rate, it is appropriate that every effort is made to keep serum phosphate concentration and PTH concentration within or close to the normal range respectively. The recognition that hyperphosphataemia increases the cardiac risk gives an entirely new urgency to hyperphosphataemia control. The magnitude of the risk is illustrated by the fact that hyperphosphataemic compared with normophosphataemic patients have a 52% higher risk of death from coronary artery disease, a 26% higher risk of sudden death, a 34% higher risk from other cardiac causes and a 39% higher risk of death from cerebrovascular accidents [5]. From the patients' perspective, prevention of cardiac death is far more important than prevention of renal osteodystrophy, which in the past has dominated the nephrologists' perception of why hyperphosphataemia is dangerous.
Acknowledgments
With the help of Else Kröner Fresenius-Stiftung and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Am 93-2/3).
Notes
Please see also Preliminary Report by Marchais et al. (pp. 21782183 in this issue).
References