Franz Volhard Clinic, HELIOS Klinikum-Berlin, Medical Faculty of the Charité, Humboldt University of Berlin, D-13125 Berlin, Germany,Email: Kettritz{at}fvk-berlin.de
Case
A 69-year-old man with known coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease and chronic renal insufficiency was admitted to the hospital acutely ill. He had received an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, a ß-blocker and phenprocuomon. He was dyspnoeic and in acute distress. He had distended neck veins and rales bilaterally. Furthermore, he had pitting oedema of the sole remaining lower extremity. After a brief physical examination and administration of oxygen, morphine and nitroglycerin, laboratory information was available. An electrocardiogram (ECG) was done (Figure 1, left panel). His haemoglobin was 11.9 g/dl, haematocrit 37 vol%, white count 9100, platelets 123 000 µl3, INR was 8.1 and serum creatinine was 700 µmol/l. His electrolytes were calcium 1.78 mmol/l, phosphorus 2.1 mmol/l. pH was 7.13, with an HCO3 of 9 mmol/l and a PaCO2 of 27 mmHg, indicating metabolic acidosis with a rather low respiratory compensation. We were in a quandary; dialysis was indicated for various reasons; however, the INR value prompted us to administer vitamin K and fresh frozen plasma over the next 24 h. Then dialysis was performed in our intensive care unit.
|
Question
What can possibly cause malignant hypercalcaemia in dialysis patients?
Answers to the quiz on the previous page
Our patient had no reason to suffer from any known hypercalcaemic syndrome. Moreover, hypercalcaemia within hours to minutes directs the attention to a technical problem. None of us had ever seen the hard water syndrome before. In a foregone era, hypercalcaemia and hypermagnesaemia occurred because of problems with tapwater used for dialysis [1]. Several dialysis unit epidemics drew the attention of nephrologists to water purification [2,3]. We retired the elderly reverse-osmosis (RO) machine and dialysis apparatus, even though we could find no fault with these machines. We substituted a new machine and a different RO machine. With the new machinery, the patient's calcium values decreased and, after numerous treatments, he gradually recovered. A follow-up ECG was improved (Figure 1, right panel).
We measured calcium from the tap, from the RO machine and from the dialysis machine. We found that the tap gave hard water (no surprise in Berlin). The RO machine was excellent in reducing the concentrations to zero. Oddly, the dialysis machine, although receiving a calcium value of zero, returned a much higher calcium value. We reasoned that something must be wrong in the electrolyte distribution of the concentrates. The detection device of the machine determines a deviation of 5 mmol/l in terms of electrochemical deviance. This deviation had not occurred. We reasoned that the calcium aberration was not sufficient for the machine to find it. Our data (Figure 2) initially suggested that the dialysis machine and its mixing device must be at fault. The RO machine was innocent since the calcium concentration after the device was zero. We blamed the dialysis machine, but were unable to incriminate it further. The manufacturers of both devices sent technical representatives to our department immediately. However, they were unable to find fault with either of their products.
|
|
Our diagnosis: hard times with hard water.
Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
References