Clinical prognostic factors in biopsy-proven benign nephrosclerosis

Bjørn Egil Vikse1,, Knut Aasarød3, Leif Bostad2 and Bjarne M. Iversen1

The Norwegian Kidney Register, 1 Institute of Medicine and 2 Department of Pathology Gade Institute, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen and 3 Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Trondheim, Norway



   Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Background. Hypertensive renal damage has become one of the most important causes of end-stage renal failure (ESRF) in Western countries. Affected patients rarely have a kidney biopsy and their diagnoses therefore remain uncertain. The objective of the present study was to examine patients suspected of renal glomerular disease, which at biopsy proved to have isolated benign nephrosclerosis. We wanted to study the effect of different clinical and laboratory variables at the time of biopsy on the short-term and long-term progression to ESRF and death.

Methods. We retrospectively examined 102 patients who were diagnosed by kidney biopsy in Norway between April 1988 and December 1990. All patients were followed by means of registries for ~13 years to describe renal and patient survival.

Results. The age of the patients at the time of biopsy was 55±15 years (range 15–88 years). Three years after the time of biopsy, 18% had developed ESRF and 24% had died; the corresponding numbers 13 years after biopsy were 32% and 47%. By Kaplan–Meier analyses, the following variables indicated short-term progression to ESRF: serum creatinine >=200 µmol/l, systolic blood pressure >=160 mmHg and proteinuria >=1 g/24 h. In addition, patients with increased diastolic blood pressure, increased age and decreased serum albumin tended to develop ESRF more often. Long-term predictors of ESRF in Kaplan–Meier analyses were increased serum creatinine and urinary protein. Independent risk factors for progression to ESRF were increased serum creatinine and increased urinary protein. Independent risk factors for death were increased age and increased serum creatinine.

Conclusions. Benign nephrosclerosis is a common condition that is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Short-term predictors of ESRF differ from long-term predictors and this may reflect a pathophysiologically meaningful difference.

Keywords: chronic renal failure; hypertension; kidney biopsy; mortality; risk factors



   Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Hypertensive kidney disease is the presumed primary cause of end-stage renal failure (ESRF) in ~15% of the patients receiving renal replacement therapy in Europe and the number has been increasing in recent years [1]. It is generally accepted that malignant hypertension and renovascular disease may lead to ESRF, but there remains a controversy as to whether the isolated classical benign hypertensive nephrosclerosis leads to ESRF [2]. Rostand et al. [3] showed in a small retrospective study that 15% of patients with essential hypertension developed renal failure during an average period of 5 years, while other larger cohort studies have shown that ~2% develop renal failure in 5 years [4]. When patients with presumed hypertensive nephrosclerosis are examined thoroughly, evidence of other primary diseases, such as glomerulonephritis, atherosclerotic renovascular disease, embolization and episodes of malignant hypertension, are often present [5,6]. To confirm the diagnosis of hypertensive nephrosclerosis, the patient should have a kidney biopsy. This is rarely performed and the diagnosis of hypertensive nephrosclerosis is made by exclusion of other diseases barely on clinical grounds [2,7], an approach that has been shown to have a specificity of ~90% in blacks [8] and ~50% in whites [9]. In Norway, isolated benign nephrosclerosis (BN) is among the most common findings in kidney biopsies (data from the Norwegian Kidney Register).

Characteristic features of hypertensive nephrosclerosis are hypertension followed by a decrease in glomerular filtration rate. Proteinuria and haematuria are other common findings [10]. Morphologically, BN is characterized by arteriolar hyaline degeneration and sclerosis, especially seen in preglomerular vessels, with narrowing of the vascular lumen followed by glomerular and tubulointerstitial ischaemia [11]. Potential risk factors for progression to ESRF include black race, cigarette smoking, increased age, family history of ESRF, microalbuminuria, increased blood pressure, decreased response to antihypertensive treatment and history of urinary tract abnormalities [3,1214].

The purpose of the present study was to retrospectively describe prevalence and characteristics of patients with biopsy-proven BN in Norway in the years 1988–1990. We also wanted to investigate short-term and long-term clinical prognostic factors for ESRF and death.



   Subjects and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients
The patients were selected from the Norwegian Kidney Register, a database containing both clinical and histopathological data at the time of biopsy. The database covers all patients with a renal biopsy in Norway (4.5 million inhabitants). In general, indications for renal biopsy in Norway involve proteinuria >1 g/24 h or a serum creatinine >150 µmol/l if a renal parenchymal cause is suspected. We studied patients biopsied from April 1988 to December 1990. In this period the register received a total of 1176 biopsies, including 102 diagnosed with BN. All cases were reviewed by one experienced nephropathologist at the Norwegian Kidney Register who used the diagnostic criteria described below. Consequently, consistent diagnostic criteria were used in all cases. The patients were treated and followed in 16 hospitals in Norway.

The primary endpoint in the present study was ESRF, defined as chronic renal failure necessitating chronic dialysis treatment or renal transplantation. The secondary endpoint was patient death. Two methods of follow-up were used. First, all patients were followed until 1 January 2002 and data for patient survival and ESRF were obtained from the Norwegian Population Register and the Norwegian ESRD Register. Second, we managed to follow 84 (82%) patients by review of the individual patient's hospital records for ~3 years after biopsy and information about blood pressure and serum creatinine were obtained. The results presented in this paper were mainly obtained by the first method.

Histopathological diagnosis
Standard methods of processing and staining of biopsy tissue were used. All specimens were examined by light microscopy and immunohistochemistry (staining for IgG, IgA, IgM, C3 and C1q). When considered necessary, electron microscopy was applied to exclude other types of renal disease.

BN was diagnosed in accordance with the criteria given in the WHO monograph of renal disease [11]. Light microscopic observation of hyaline arteriolosclerosis, especially of the afferent arteriole, is characteristic of BN. The arteriolar wall is thickened by homogenous eosinophilic material that narrows the lumen. Arteries may show medial hypertrophy, subsequent intimal sclerosis and reduplication of elastic laminae. There is a variable degree of glomerular capillary wrinkling, mesangial matrix increase, glomerular capillary collapse and glomerular sclerosis associated with focal tubular atrophy with interstitial fibrosis. Areas with clusters of sclerotic glomeruli and tubulointerstitial scarring become more extensive with progression of the disease. Cases complicated by other kidney diseases, like glomerulonephritis, malignant hypertension and interstitial nephritis, were excluded from the study.

Clinical and laboratory investigations
Baseline was defined as the time of biopsy, when standard clinical and laboratory tests were performed. In this paper we have focused on the following baseline variables: age, sex, serum creatinine, urinary protein, blood pressure and serum albumin. Unfortunately, all baseline variables had not been recorded for all patients and, especially, urinary protein and serum albumin were missing in some patients. Dates of death, start of dialysis or kidney transplantation were recorded. For use in statistical analyses, continuous variables were converted to ordinal as shown in the ‘Results' section. Values of serum creatinine were considered normal when <110 µmol/l (1.24 mg/dl) for women and <125 µmol/l (1.41 mg/dl) for men (guidelines at Haukeland University Hospital). They were regarded as moderately increased if they were higher than normal but <200 µmol/l (2.26 mg/dl) and largely increased if >200 µmol/l.

Statistical analysis
The SPSS package was used for statistical analysis. Data are presented as means±SD for normally distributed continuous variables and as median (range) for continuous variables not having a normal distribution. Significance testing was performed by Student's t-test and Mann–Whitney test. Differences of proportions between patient groups were compared by the chi-square test. A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant and all tests were two-tailed.

Renal survival for subgroups of patients was described with the Kaplan–Meier method and the analyses were censored for death. Log-rank tests were performed to estimate P-values of differences between subgroups. These were performed separately for renal and patient survival and separately for the first 3 years after biopsy and for the entire follow-up period. The latter was performed to estimate both short-term and long-term P-values of differences. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to evaluate the effects of the individual baseline variables on progression to ESRF or death. These analyses were applied only to the entire follow-up period. The analysis yields estimated relative risks (hazards ratio) for each unit change in the included variables. This model controls for differences in other included variables possibly affecting disease progression, generating independent risk factors for progression [15]. The following variables were entered into the Cox model: continuous values of age, proteinuria, serum albumin, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and a logarithmically transformed serum creatinine and the dichotomous variable sex. The analyses were done in a backward stepwise manner. The assumption of time-independent covariates was tested with covariate adjusted log–log plots and the assumption was met. The maximum number of patients was included in each step and at the last step all variables were significant (P<0.05).



   Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
A total of 102 patients were diagnosed with BN, 68 men and 34 women (Table 1Go). This constitutes 8.7% of the total number of biopsies received at the Norwegian Kidney Register in this period. Mean age at the time of biopsy was 55.4±14.6 years (range 15.2–88.2 years). Median serum creatinine at the time of biopsy was 165 µmol/l (55–1286 µmol/l) and the serum creatinine value was normal in 30 patients (30%), moderately elevated (<200 µmol/l) in 28 patients (28%) and >=200 µmol/l in 41 patients (41%).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.  Patient characteristics

 
Follow-up data were obtained for all patients for a median period of follow-up of 11.7 years (0.1–13.6 years). During follow-up, 27 (26.4%) patients developed chronic renal failure, 15 of these patients died later during this period. Another 31 patients died during the follow-up period, giving a total of 46 (45.1%). The causes of death were cardiovascular disorders in 13 patients, cancer in six patients, renal failure and other organ failure in seven patients and sepsis in two patients. The causes of death were unknown for 16 patients, but the majority of these patients died late during follow-up.

Thirty-eight patients (37.6%) received antihypertensive treatment at the time of biopsy. Patients receiving antihypertensive treatment at the time of biopsy had significantly higher diastolic blood pressure than patients not receiving any antihypertensive treatment. By the second method of follow-up (median follow-up of 30.1 months), information about antihypertensive treatment and blood pressure measurements were available for 76 patients. Sixty (79%) of these received antihypertensive treatment during follow-up. Patients that received antihypertensive treatment during follow-up were significantly older and had higher baseline proteinuria and higher baseline serum creatinine, but had similar baseline blood pressure levels compared with patients not receiving antihypertensive treatment. Compared with the patients who did not receive antihypertensive treatment, patients that received treatment had a significantly reduced systolic blood pressure during follow-up (P<0.01) and a non-significant lowering of their diastolic blood pressure. The risk of development of ESRF or death was similar whether the patients received blood pressure treatment or not.

At baseline, values of logarithmically transformed serum creatinine correlated significantly with urinary protein. Values of systolic blood pressure correlated with values of age, diastolic blood pressure and urinary protein. Values of serum albumin correlated inversely with values of logarithmically transformed serum creatinine, urinary protein, diastolic blood pressure and age.

Overall prognosis
As shown in Figure 1Go, both renal and patient survival showed a steep decline during the first 3 years; thereafter the decline diminished. We therefore decided to study separately the first 3 years after biopsy and the entire follow-up period.



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.  Kaplan–Meier survival plot illustrating progression to ESRF (A) and death (B).

 

Predictors of progression to ESRF
Cumulative probabilities of renal survival for all subgroups of patients are given in Table 2Go. Patients with increased serum creatinine and urinary protein had a significantly higher risk of progression to ESRF during the entire follow-up period. Patients with increased systolic blood pressure significantly more often developed ESRF during the first 3 years after biopsy but had similar risk of developing ESRF after 13 years of follow-up. Increased diastolic blood pressure, increased age and decreased serum albumin also tended to predict ESRF during the first 3 years of follow-up, whereas after 13 years they showed no effect.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.  Three and 13 years cumulative renal survival for subgroups of patients

 
Multivariable analysis was performed (Table 3Go) and yielded the following estimated relative risks [with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)] for each change in the remaining variables: Each doubling of the serum creatinine concentration increased the risk 2.6 times (CI: 2.1–3.3) (P<0.0001). Every 1 g/24 h increase in urinary protein increased the risk by 1.4 (CI: 1.1–1.9) (P=0.015).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3.  Cox regression for renal survival

 
Predictors of death
Cumulative probabilities of patient survival for all subgroups of patients are given in Table 4Go. Multivariable analysis yielded the following estimated relative risks (with 95% CIs) for each change in the remaining variables: Each doubling of the serum creatinine concentration increased the risk by 2.1 (CI: 1.6–2.8) (P<0.0001) and every 10 year increase in age increased the risk by 2.5 (CI: 1.9–3.2) (P<0.0001).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.  Three and 13 years cumulative patient survival for subgroups of patients

 



   Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The main information that emerges from the present study is that BN is a common disease in general nephrological practice and is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Typical findings are also the high rate of cardiac and cerebral deaths, indicating that the renal disease is part of a generalized disease affecting the heart and major vessels. The clinical features of BN included hypertension, high age, chronic renal failure and non-nephrotic proteinuria, where chronic renal failure was the most important. The disease may be associated with lipid and genetic disturbances, factors that were not examined in the present study. A renal biopsy is of great importance when making a reliable diagnosis and clinical and laboratory observations should be of major importance in dealing with this disease, which is probably more common than expected.

The major strength of our study is the fact that we studied all Norwegian patients who were diagnosed with BN on biopsy and that we followed these patients for 13 years. Similar studies have, to our knowledge, never been performed before. We managed to follow up all patients for ~13 years by means of registry data. In addition, we followed 84 patients by means of hospital medical records. No endpoints have been missed. Missing baseline variable values decreased the number of patients available for the analyses. The effect of this was probably of minor importance.

We have shown that patients with biopsy-proven BN constituted 8.7% of the total number of patients having a renal biopsy in Norway, representing an annual incidence of about nine patients per million. These numbers seem to be higher than those reported from Denmark where BN constituted 2.1% of the total number of biopsies, an incidence of 0.8 per million per year [16] and from the UK where BN constituted 2.5% of the biopsies [10]. This difference may be due to different indications for kidney biopsy in Norway and one possible explanation could be that most patients in Norway will become biopsied if they have a proteinuria >1 g/24 h or a serum creatinine >150 µmol/l and a renal parenchymal cause is suspected. During the follow-up period, 18% of the patients who progressed to ESRF in Norway suffered from renal vascular disease (EDTA codes 70–72); an annual incidence of ~12 per million (unpublished data). During the same period, essential hypertension was assumed to be the cause of ESRF in 13–15% of English and Spanish patients [1] and 28% of American patients [17]. The higher number of patients reported to develop ESRF from hypertension than actually diagnosed with BN at biopsy seems reasonable when taking into account that patients with presumed hypertensive nephrosclerosis traditionally are not biopsied. It should be remembered that our patients were not selected for kidney biopsy because hypertensive nephrosclerosis was the most probable cause, but because a glomerular disease was suspected. Our patients may therefore represent cases with more advanced hypertensive nephrosclerosis.

The present study has shown that BN is associated with severe morbidity and mortality. BN is recognized as a disease with steady progression towards ESRF and the fact that patients with largely increased serum creatinine develop ESRF earlier than patients with normal or moderately increased serum creatinine is, therefore, of no surprise. However, the progression towards ESRF seems to be slow for patients with BN, considering that no patients progressed from a serum creatinine <200 µmol/l to ESRF during the first 5 years after biopsy. The baseline serum creatinine value seems, therefore, to be a very important indicator of how far the disease has progressed and for the potential of further renal damage. Increased urinary protein independently predicted ESRF. This observation may support the theory that proteinuria is toxic to the kidney and may be an important mediator for development of ESRF [18].

The most important risk factors for death were older age and increased serum creatinine. The fact that older patients have an increased mortality is of no surprise and the increased mortality associated with renal failure is well known.

Whereas the effects of increased serum creatinine and urinary protein on ESRF seemed to increase during follow-up, increased blood pressure, increased age and decreased serum albumin all tended to predict ESRF during the first 3 years, after which the predictive effect of these variables was lost. There may, therefore, be a qualitative difference between long-term predictors and those only predictive during the first 3 years. As both increased systolic blood pressure and decreased serum albumin were associated with older age, one explanation might be that older patients develop ESRF at a higher rate because of less functional renal reserve [19], more advanced arteriolosclerosis [20] and decreased response to antihypertensive treatment [14]. The latter may be supported by the fact that the effect of short-term risk factors seemed to disappear after 3 years and the general knowledge that older patients with systolic hypertension are bad responders to antihypertensive medication. The qualitative difference between short-term and long-term risk factors suggested above may also represent the fact that whereas increased proteinuria and serum creatinine may reflect increased renal damage, hypertension, old age and hypoalbuminaemia may reflect decreased defence mechanisms against progression of renal failure. This remains to be explored further.

Antihypertensive treatment was given to 37% of the patients at the time of biopsy and this increased to 79% during follow-up. The fact that 62% of the patients did not receive antihypertensive treatment at baseline despite being diagnosed with BN may have at least two explanations. First, BN may arise in susceptible persons even with near-normal levels of blood pressure, due to renal susceptibility genes [12], age [20] or atherosclerosis. Second, patients with neglected or badly controlled blood pressure probably have an increased risk of developing BN. Follow-up data for antihypertensive treatment were only available for 76 patients during the first 3 years. This severely limited the possibility of discussing the effect of treatment in our study and this was therefore omitted. However, one comment should be made: although the 60 patients receiving antihypertensive treatment were older, had higher proteinuria and higher serum creatinine, they had similar risks of progression to ESRF or death compared with the 16 patients not receiving antihypertensive treatment. These data may indicate a benefit of antihypertensive treatment.

In conclusion, BN is associated with high mortality and morbidity and the vascular changes seen in BN are markers of a generalized disease in these patients. It seems reasonable to recommend close clinical follow-ups of patients with high blood pressure, particularly if these patients have the risk factors demonstrated in this study, such as increased serum creatinine, increased urinary protein, old age and decreased serum albumin. Early start and vigorous treatment of hypertension may improve prognosis. We have also demonstrated the difference between long-term and short-term risk factors and this should be considered in other studies of prognostic factors for ESRF.



   Acknowledgments
 
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Norwegian nephrologists and internalists who submit data to the Norwegian Kidney Register. This study was supported by a student grant from the Norwegian Research Council and Haukeland University Hospital.



   Notes
 
Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr Bjørn Egil Vikse, Elvegård 37, 5518 Haugesund, Norway. Email: bjorn.vikse{at}med.uib.no Back



   References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Valderrabano F, Gomez-Campdera F, Jones EH. Hypertension as cause of end-stage renal disease: lessons from international registries. Kidney Int Suppl1998; 68:S60–S66[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Freedman BI, Iskandar SS, Appel RG. The link between hypertension and nephrosclerosis. Am J Kidney Dis1995; 25:207–221[ISI][Medline]
  3. Rostand SG, Brown G, Kirk KA, Rutsky EA, Dustan HP. Renal insufficiency in treated essential hypertension. N Engl J Med1989; 320:684–688[Abstract]
  4. Shulman NB, Ford CE, Hall WD et al. Prognostic value of serum creatinine and effect of treatment of hypertension on renal function. Results from the hypertension detection and follow-up program. The Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program Cooperative Group. Hypertension1989; 13:I80–I93[Medline]
  5. Zucchelli P, Zuccala A. The diagnostic dilemma of hypertensive nephrosclerosis: the nephrologist's view. Am J Kidney Dis 1993; 21 [Suppl 2]:87–91[ISI][Medline]
  6. Harvey JM, Howie AJ, Lee SJ et al. Renal biopsy findings in hypertensive patients with proteinuria. Lancet1992; 340:1435–1436[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  7. Caetano EP, Zatz R, Praxedes JN. The clinical diagnosis of hypertensive nephrosclerosis: how reliable is it? Nephrol Dial Transplant1999; 14:288–290[Free Full Text]
  8. Fogo A, Breyer JA, Smith MC et al. Accuracy of the diagnosis of hypertensive nephrosclerosis in African Americans: a report from the African American Study of Kidney Disease (AASK) Trial. AASK Pilot Study Investigators. Kidney Int1997; 51:244–252[ISI][Medline]
  9. Zucchelli P, Zuccala A. Can we accurately diagnose nephrosclerosis? Nephrol Dial Transplant 1995; 10 [Suppl 6]:2–5
  10. Innes A, Johnston PA, Morgan AG, Davison AM, Burden RP. Clinical features of benign hypertensive nephrosclerosis at time of renal biopsy. Q J Med1993; 86:271–275[ISI][Medline]
  11. Churg J, Sobin LH. Benign nephrosclerosis. In: Churg J, ed. Renal Disease—Classification and Atlas of Glomerular Diseases. Igaku-Shoin, Tokyo: 1982; 211–224
  12. Luke RG. Hypertensive nephrosclerosis: pathogenesis and prevalence. Essential hypertension is an important cause of end-stage renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant1999; 14:2271–2278[Free Full Text]
  13. Regalado M, Yang S, Wesson DE. Cigarette smoking is associated with augmented progression of renal insufficiency in severe essential hypertension. Am J Kidney Dis2000; 35:687–694[ISI][Medline]
  14. Perry HM, Jr, Miller JP, Fornoff JR et al. Early predictors of 15-year end-stage renal disease in hypertensive patients. Hypertension1995; 25:587–594[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Cox D. Regression models and life table. J R Stat Soc B1972; 34:187–200[ISI]
  16. Heaf J, Lokkegaard H, Larsen S. The epidemiology and prognosis of glomerulonephritis in Denmark 1985–1997. Nephrol Dial Transplant1999; 14:1889–1897[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Agodoa LY, Eggers PW. Renal replacement therapy in the United States: data from the United States Renal Data System. Am J Kidney Dis1995; 25:119–133[ISI][Medline]
  18. Keane WF. Proteinuria: its clinical importance and role in progressive renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis2000; 35:S97–S105[ISI][Medline]
  19. Lindeman RD, Tobin J, Shock NW. Longitudinal studies on the rate of decline in renal function with age. J Am Geriatr Soc1985; 33:278–285[ISI][Medline]
  20. Tracy RE, Velez-Duran M, Heigle T, Oalmann MC. Two variants of nephrosclerosis separately related to age and blood pressure. Am J Pathol1988; 131:270–282[Abstract]
Received for publication: 8. 8.02
Accepted in revised form: 7.11.02