In Vitro and in Vivo Analysis of the Regulation of a Transcription Factor Gene by Thyroid Hormone during Xenopus laevis Metamorphosis
J. David Furlow and
Donald D. Brown
Section of Neurobiology, Physiology, and Behavior (J.D.F.)
Division of Biological Sciences University of California, Davis,
California 95616
Carnegie Institution of Washington
(D.D.B.) Department of Embryology Baltimore, Maryland 21210
 |
ABSTRACT
|
---|
A novel, basic region leucine zipper transcription
factor (TH/bZIP) is dramatically up-regulated at the climax of
metamorphosis in Xenopus laevis. It can be induced in
tadpoles prematurely by thyroid hormone (TH) with kinetics that are
intermediate between early and late Xenopus TH response
genes. A small amount of early, cycloheximide-resistant up-regulation
is observed, but the majority of TH/bZIP mRNA accumulation occurs after
12 h of treatment in parallel with late response gene induction.
There are two genomic TH/bZIP genes in the pseudotetraploid X.
laevis genome that are coordinately regulated. They have highly
conserved regulatory regions that contain two conserved, adjoining DR+4
thyroid response elements (TRE) in opposite orientation. The early/late
TH induction kinetics has been reproduced in transient transfection
assays. The secondary rise of transcriptional activity requires DNA
regions other than the TREs and, therefore, the interaction of
transcription factors other than the TH receptors. Finally, the
regulatory region of the TH/bZIP gene has been used to drive green
fluorescent protein in transgenic X. laevis tadpoles.
Regulation of the transgene during spontaneous and induced
metamorphosis mimics that of the endogenous TH/bZIP gene. The newly
developed X. laevis transgenesis method has distinct
advantages for the analysis of transcriptional regulatory elements over
transient transfection assays and will be useful for further in
vivo studies of TH-response gene regulation during development.
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
---|
Amphibian metamorphosis is a thyroid hormone (TH)-dependent
developmental event. The rising level of TH from the developing
tadpoles thyroid gland induces a timed series of functional and
morphological changes leading to the formation of a frog (1). These
TH-induced morphogenetic changes are the result of regulated gene
expression changes (2, 3), a view that was suggested originally from
the ability of protein and RNA synthesis inhibitors to block TH-induced
tissue responses in organ culture (4). The discovery that TH receptors
(TRs) are nuclear proteins that behave as ligand-regulated
transcription factors (5, 6) strongly supports the role of
transcriptional control in metamorphosis. All vertebrates studied to
date have two highly conserved TR isoforms encoded by separate genes
that are designated TH receptor
(TR
) and TH receptor ß (TRß)
(7, 8). The X. laevis TRs behave similarly to the mammalian
and avian TRs in terms of their ligand and DNA binding properties,
their requirement to heterodimerize with retinoid X receptors (RXRs)
for high-affinity DNA binding (9), and the ability to repress
transcription in the absence of ligand (10). In X. laevis,
TR
appears during embryogenesis and is present throughout tadpole
life, while the mRNA (11, 12) and protein (13) levels of TRß, which
is an early, or direct, response gene of TH, follows the endogenous TH
concentration.
Most progress in our understanding of the molecular basis of TH action
has occurred in mammalian systems. These studies have focused on
synthetic TH response elements (TREs) or natural elements and promoters
from a few model genes. However, many response genes studied in mammals
are only regulated a few fold by TH, while the TH-regulated genes in
X. laevis tadpoles are induced greater than 10-fold by the
hormone (14, 15). A large number of cDNAs have been cloned
corresponding to genes that are activated by TH with distinct kinetic
profiles, and in tissues undergoing dramatic morphological changes as a
result of the hormone. TH rapidly and directly induces a set of
transcription factors including TRß (16) and the zinc finger
transcription factor xBTEB (2). This early response is resistant to
protein synthesis inhibitors. Indeed, both the TRß (17) and xBTEB
(J. D. Furlow, A. Kanamori, and D. D. Brown, manuscript in
preparation) genes contain high-affinity, nearly identical TREs that
are a close match to optimized synthetic TREs studied in mammals. The
second wave of changes in gene expression occurs in the second day
after TH treatment and results in the production of gene products
involved in tissue-specific responses. In the tail, for instance,
several late genes encode secreted, membrane-bound, or cytoplasmic
proteases that are likely to be involved in tissue breakdown (2). Thus,
the study of TH action in metamorphosis provides the opportunity to
study a hormonally controlled gene expression cascade from the time of
TH binding to its receptor until the ultimate morphogenetic response of
a given tissue.
We began our analysis of the TH-induced waves of gene expression with a
gene that encodes a member of the basic leucine zipper family of
transcription factors, TH/bZIP (15, 18). This gene is up-regulated in
tadpoles by exogenous TH from an undetectable baseline, and it is
abruptly activated at the climax of spontaneous metamorphosis in a
variety of tadpole tissues. TH/bZIP cDNA fragments were isolated
independently in screens for TH response genes in tail (15) and
intestine (19). Because the Xenopus laevis genome is
tetraploid at most loci (20), two related TH/bZIP cDNAs derived from
duplicated genes were found independently and are expressed with
identical kinetics during spontaneous and induced metamorphosis. The
two copies of this gene were called originally genes 8 and 9 (15, 19).
In contrast to TRß and xBTEB, the kinetics of TH/bZIP up-regulation
by TH is intermediate between early and late genes; i.e. a
small amount of mRNA is synthesized beginning soon after after TH
addition, but the bulk of up-regulation occurs after a delay of 12
h (15) in parallel with a number of late responding genes, including
those encoding secreted proteases (2, 15). Nevertheless, the small,
early phase of TH/bZIP up-regulation is at least partially resistant to
cycloheximide (15, 18). The behavior of these genes in response to TH
is reminiscent of the early/late class of ecdysone response genes in
Drosophila (21) or delayed primary hormone response genes in
mammals (22). In the Xenopus tail and intestine, the TH/bZIP
genes are not activated until metamorphic climax, at the peak of
circulating TH levels. By this time, direct response genes are
maximally induced and have already been rising for 2 or 3 days
(15).
The delayed nature of the full induction of the TH/bZIP genes suggests
that they might be responding primarily to rising levels of TRß,
other induced transcription factors, or both. We therefore sought to
find the TREs and other key regulatory elements of the early/late
TH/bZIP genes as part of a systematic analysis of TH-mediated gene
induction during metamorphosis. In addition, we have adopted the
recently established transgenic method (23) for X. laevis to
confirm features of the TH/bZIP promoter in vivo.
 |
RESULTS
|
---|
The Expression of TH Response Genes, TRs, and RXRs in the Tadpole
Tail
Accumulation of mRNA after TH induction in the tadpole tail
demonstrates the difference between the simple direct response kinetics
[xBTEB (Fig. 1A
) and TRß (Fig. 1B
)]
and the early/late response of TH/bZIP mRNA (Fig. 1A
). xBTEB and TRß
are maximally induced by 12 h, while TH/bZIP mRNA is just
beginning to be detected at that point. Expression profiles of the mRNA
for two isoforms of RXR (
and ß) and TR
confirm that they are
all expressed in the tail before hormone treatment, but they are just
marginally regulated. RXR
was not detected in the tail under these
conditions.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Kinetics of TH Induction of xBTEB, TH/bZIP, and
xTRß mRNA in Tadpole Tails
Stage 50 tadpoles were treated with 100 nM T3
for the indicated times, and total tail RNA was analyzed by Northern
blotting using the indicated cDNA probes. A, The relative abundance of
the xBTEB and TH/bZIP mRNAs was compared and normalized to the
expression of the constitutive rpL8 mRNA. Levels of mRNA are expressed
as normalized phosphorimager units. Black squares,
xBTEB; open circles, TH/bZIP. B, The abundance of the
xTR (black squares), xTRß (black
circles), xRXR (open squares), and xRXRß
(open circles) mRNAs were quantitated at the indicated
times after T3 treatment as in panel A.
|
|
Genomic Organization of the TH/bZIP Genes
Southern analysis of X. laevis homozygous diploid DNA
(24) with a probe from the first exon of TH/bZIP shows that there are
two genomic copies (Fig. 2A
) as there are
for many X. laevis genes. The genes previously referred to
as genes 8 and 9 (15, 19) are referred to here as TH/bZIP A and B,
respectively. We cloned both genomic copies of the TH/bZIP gene (A and
B) including 20 kb upstream from the transcription start site (Fig. 2B
). Both TH/bZIP genes A and B encode polyadenylated messages of 5, 3,
and 2 kb (14). A single intron splits the 5'-untranslated region
(UTR). TH/bZIP exon 2 contains 90 of the 220 bp of 5'-UTR, the entire
1 kb coding sequence, and adjacent 3'-UTR including a consensus
A2UA3 signal at the expected position to
produce the 2-kb mRNA species. We do not know whether any additional
introns split the 3'-UTRs which give rise to the 3 kb and 5 kb TH/bZIP
messages. The extent of divergence of the two genes was analyzed by
sequencing 1 kb of genomic DNA surrounding the start site of
transcription (Fig. 2B
). Exon 1 is completely conserved between the two
genes, and high sequence conservation persists for approximately 250 bp
upstream, presumably corresponding to promoter sequences. In both the
intron and 5' of the promoter, sequence conservation drops rapidly to
3040%. This genomic analysis demonstrates the simplicity of the
structure of the TH/bZIP genes and confirms their duplication in the
X. laevis genome. In addition, the genes have diverged
enough to permit a meaningful comparison of conserved regulatory
elements.

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Mapping of High-Affinity TR/RXR Binding Sites in
the TH/bZIP A and B Genes
A, Southern blot analysis of X. laevis homozygous
diploid DNA digested with BstXI, HindIII,
or PstI and hybridized with a TH/bZIP 5'-flanking
region/exon 1 probe (-246 to +130). B, The percent nucleotide identity
from -500 bp to +500 bp relative to the transcription start site of
TH/bZIP A and B is indicated on the diagram, with the region
representing exon 1 in black. The TH/bZIP gene structure
is represented above; black boxes, noncoding sequences;
open box, coding sequences; black bar
represents 5 kb of genomic sequence. Arrow represents
the transcription start site. C, Reverse gel shift assays were
performed using 35S-labeled TR , cold RXR , and
AluI-digested genomic clones or PCR-amplified fragments
for the two TH/bZIP genes or Gem-11 DNA. Free and DNA-bound TR
were separated on 4% polyacrylamide gels. Only the TH/bZIP A and
TH/bZIP B exon 1-containing clones contained TR/RXR binding sites. Only
the results for TH/bZIP B DNA are shown here. Two binding sites mapped
to the promoter/exon 1 region of each gene (-246 to +130) and were
further mapped by generating the indicated PCR fragments (right
hand panel). The numbers above the lanes refer
to the DNA fragments used in the mobility shift assay. The region
containing the two TR/RXR binding sites are indicated below (-246 to
+130), with the PCR fragments used to map the binding sites represented
as horizontal lines. Fragment 1, -175 to +130; 2, -81
to +130; 3, +19 to +130; 4, -246 to +43; 5, -246 to -61; 6, -246 to
-156. Black rectangles, Candidate TREs (site 1 and site
2); arrow, transcription start site (+1). D,
Sequence comparison in the region surrounding exon 1 of the
TH/bZIP genes. Dots indicate conserved nucleotides;
horizontal lines indicate deletions inferred for one
gene or the other to optimize alignment. The inverted solid
triangle indicates the transcription start site at (+1).
The positions of the two TR/RXR binding sites are
shaded, underlined with arrows, and
designated TRE1 and TRE2. The thick vertical line at
+130 denotes the exon 1/intron 1 splice junction. Numbers to the
right of the aligned sequences denote the base pair position
relative to the transcription start site [determined by sequencing a
number of 5'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE)-generated
clones (2 )]. Potential transcription factor binding sites are noted
(54 ), such as those for E box factors, GATA factors, AP2, SP1, and
several GAGA sites (GAGAG) (43 ). A consensus TATA box is located at
-31. AluI sites flanking the TREs in TH/bZIP B are also
noted with a vertical line. Lightly shaded
areas indicate repetitive DNA, with thin vertical
lines indicating the boundaries of each repeat. Repeats in the
5'-flanking region of TH/bZIP A are not related to the intron repeats
in TH/bZIP A and B. The GenBank accession numbers for TH/bZIP A and
TH/bZIP B genomic sequences are AF192491 and AF192492, respectively.
|
|
Isolation of High-Affinity TR Binding Sites in the TH/bZIP
Genes
A reverse gel shift (25, 26) was adopted to map high-affinity
genomic binding sites for TRs around the TH/bZIP transcription units
(Fig. 2C
). Briefly, the TH/bZIP genomic clones (still in the
cloning vector) and the cloning vector alone were digested in parallel
with a frequent cutting enzyme such as AluI. Each set of DNA
fragments was mixed with in vitro translated,
35S-labeled xTR
or xTRß with or without in
vitro translated heterodimer partners xRXR
or xRXRß. RXR
and RXRß are expressed ubiquitously in tadpole tissues (Ref. 9 and
J. D. Furlow and D. D. Brown, unpublished results), including
the tail (Fig. 1B
) and therefore are available to serve as partners for
TR heterodimerization at metamorphosis. DNA fragments containing a TR
binding site (TRE) can complex with the heterodimer and cause the
labeled TR protein to migrate into the gel. The genomic clones
containing specific TREs were then subcloned and reanalyzed until the
binding sites were identified.
In approximately 45 kb of cloned genomic TH/bZIP B DNA and 15 kb of
TH/bZIP A DNA, only two insert-specific shifted bands were identified
in a region near the start site of transcription of both TH/bZIP A and
B. Figure 2C
shows the result for TH/bZIP B and
DNAs digested with
AluI and assayed using TR
/RXR
heterodimers. The same
results were obtained when the genomic clones were assayed with
TR
/RXRß, TRß/RXR
, or TRß/RXRß heterodimers. No binding
was detected with TR
or TRß alone (data not shown).
PCR was used to amplify and subclone regions of both genes that
included all of exon 1 and 246 bp of the 5'-flanking region (-246 to
+130) as well as progressively smaller fragments from each end. These
deletions defined the boundaries of each TRE in the mobility shift
assay (Fig. 2C
). Two adjacent TR/RXR binding sites were identified.
Each site can independently form a complex with the heterodimer (lower
band, lanes 1, 2, 4, and 5) while together they each bind a heterodimer
and form the slower moving complex (upper band, lanes 1 and 4).
Sequencing revealed that an AluI site does not separate the
two potential TREs (Fig. 2D
), further supporting this interpretation.
This region includes a consensus TATA box at -30 and many potential
sites for other known transcription factors (Fig. 2D
). Two direct
repeats with similarity to mammalian TREs (designated TRE1 and TRE2)
are located between positions -102 and -58 in both genes. Other more
diverged direct repeats can be found in the region, but they do not
bind TRs under these conditions.
High-affinity TR binding sequences that are selective for TH induction
are described as a perfect direct repeat of AGGTCA separated by 4 bp
(27, 28). The early response xBTEB (J. D. Furlow, A. Kanamori, and
D. D. Brown, manuscript in preparation) and TRß gene (17) TREs
are a close match to this synthetic, optimal TRE (Fig. 3A
). TH/bZIP TRE1 is also a close match,
while TH/bZIP TRE2 is more divergent. These results indicate that the
X. laevis TRs recognize much the same DR+4 TRE sequences as
do mammalian TRs, a result anticipated by the high sequence homology in
the DNA binding domains of X. laevis and mammalian TRs (7).
The expanded cognate TRE sequence identified by selection of optimal
sequences in vitro (28, 29) includes a preferred T in the
third position of the four nucleotide linker region, a characteristic
of all identified Xenopus TREs to date.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. The X. laevis TH/bZIP TREs Behave as
Conventional TREs in Gel Shift and Transient Transfection Assays
A, TRE sequences are aligned from Xenopus TRß, xBTEB,
TH/bZIP (TRE1 and TRE2) genes, and the rat GH gene (rGH). Positions of
the TREs relative to the transcription start sites are indicated to the
right. Shaded nucleotides are identical
to those in the consensus DR+4 TRE identified by binding site selection
using mammalian TRs (27 28 ). Additional tolerated nucleotides are
indicated below the DR+4 TRE sequence. Arrows underline
sequences related to the AGGTCA core half-site. B, Gel shift assays
with a 32P-labeled TRE and in vitro
translated X. laevis TR /RXR were used to
demonstrate direct binding to each TH/bZIP TRE. Lane 1 shows
unprogrammed wheat germ extract. Remaining lanes show TR /RXR
binding to a consensus TRE, competed with or without (-) a 1000-fold
excess of the indicated unlabeled double-stranded TH/bZIP TRE-derived
oligonucleotides or a random oligonucleotide. C, Transient transfection
assays of a luciferase reporter driven by xBTEB and TH/bZIP TREs in a
heterologous promoter. X. laevis XLA cells were
transiently transfected with the indicated TRE constructs, and extracts
were assayed for luciferase activity 48 h after treatment with
(black bars) or without (open bars) 100
nM T3. Luciferase activity was normalized to
total protein in the extract [relative light units (RLU)/µg]. Each
point was done in triplicate, and the error bars represent
SEM. Arrows indicate the number and
orientation of TRE half-sites inserted into the MTV-luciferase
construct. An X in the half-site arrow means that a G residue was
changed to a T residue. D, Dose-response curve of xBTEB and TH/bZIP
TRE1+TRE2 MTV-luciferase constructs. Expression is presented as fold
induction in T3 treated over untreated cells. Open
circles, xBTEB TRE construct; black squares,
TH/bZIP TRE1+TRE2 construct. Error bars represent SEM.
|
|
To test binding of TRs directly to TH/bZIP TRE sequences, the binding
of TR/RXR complexes to a labeled consensus TRE was competed with DNAs
containing the combined, individual, or mutated versions of TREs
derived from the TH/bZIP promoter (Fig. 3B
). TRE1 competed completely
while the more divergent TRE2 was slightly less effective. As is the
case with mammalian TREs, the G residues at the second and third
positions of the second half-site are absolutely required for binding.
In addition, an RXR is absolutely required for binding under our
conditions (data not shown). No significant differences in binding to
any of these sequences were found using TR
or TRß with either
heterodimer partner RXR
or RXRß (data not shown).
Behavior of the TREs in Transient Transfection Assays
The ability of the TH/bZIP TREs to mediate TH-induced
transcription was tested by transient transfection using a
TH-responsive Xenopus kidney cell line, XLA. First, various
TREs were cloned 40 bp upstream of the start site of a truncated
minimal mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter (
MTV)
driving the expression of the firefly luciferase gene (30). The single
xBTEB TRE permits strong TH-induced up-regulation of the reporter (Fig. 3C
). When both TH/bZIP TREs are together (TH/bZIP TRE1+ TRE2, separated
by 5 bp as in the native promoter), strong activation of the construct
is observed that is equal to or greater than the xBTEB TRE. The
activation of the coupled TH/bZIP TREs is more than additive over the
activation of each TRE alone (Fig. 3C
). The second and third G residues
of the 3' half-sites are again absolutely required for induction, as
they are in binding assays. We consistently observe a 15- to 30-fold
activation of the xBTEB or coupled TH/bZIP TREs in the context of this
heterologous promoter without the need for cotransfection of TRs in XLA
cells. A mammalian TRE from the rat GH gene is induced barely over the
vector alone. Despite the apparent synergistic interaction of the
TH/bZIP TREs, the single xBTEB and coupled TH/bZIP TREs mediate
transcriptional activation with very similar dose-response curves (Fig. 3D
).
We tested the transcriptional activation of the TH/bZIP TREs in the
context of their own promoter. The conserved region of the TH/bZIP
promoters (including exon 1, -246 to +130 relative to the
transcription start site) was cloned upstream of the luciferase gene
and assayed for TH induction in transiently transfected XLA cells (Fig. 4A
). A consistent 5- to 10-fold induction
was detected using the wild-type promoter, and no induction is observed
when both TREs are deleted. Curiously, deletion of the weaker TRE2
resulted in an even stronger induction of the reporter gene.
Nevertheless, at least one of the two TREs (TRE1) is required for TH
induction of the TH/bZIP promoter in these assays.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. Transient Transfection Assays of TH/bZIP Promoter
A, TH/bZIP B wild-type or TRE deleted promoters (-246 to +130 bp) were
placed upstream of luciferase gene and transfected into
Xenopus XLA cells. Cell extracts were assayed for
luciferase activity and normalized to micrograms of protein
(RLU/µg x 10-3) after treatment for 48 h with
(black bars) or without (white bars) 100
nM T3. Schematics of constructs are shown
left. Open boxes indicate positions of
TREs, BamHI indicates the site of TRE replacement by a
BamHI site, and arrows indicate the
transcription start site. B, Kinetics of T3 induction of
TH/bZIP B wild-type promoter construct (open circles)
vs. TH/bZIP TRE1+TRE2 in the MTV promoter
(black squares), expressed as fold induction of
T3 treated vs. untreated cells. C, Kinetics
of T3 induction of TH/bZIP promoter constructs, with the
xBTEB TRE inserted into the deleted TRE2 site (black
squares) vs. the TH/bZIP TRE2 reinserted into
the deletion site (open circles). D, Kinetics of
T3 induction of the wild-type TH/bZIP promoter construct
cotransfected with a xTR expression vector (black
squares), a xTRß expression vector (black
diamonds), or a control vector (open circles).
In all cases, each point was done in triplicate, and the error bars
represent SEM.
|
|
Importantly, the TH/bZIP promoter reproduces early/late kinetics of the
endogenous gene in the transient transfection assay (Fig. 4B
). There is
a low level of early up-regulation, eventually reaching maximal
induction at 24 h after TH addition. By contrast, there is a rapid
and steady increase of luciferase activity induced from the TH/bZIP
TREs in the heterologous
MTV promoter (Fig. 4B
). The TH/bZIP TREs
and the xBTEB TRE are induced nearly identically in the
MTV promoter
(data not shown). Our preliminary results indicate that the early xBTEB
promoter fused to its TRE containing enhancer shows a more rapid
response than TH/bZIP promoter as well (J. D. Furlow, A. Kanamori,
and D. D. Brown, manuscript in preparation). Two different
approaches were used in an attempt to override the sluggish early
induction of the TH/bZIP promoter. First, replacing the weaker TH/bZIP
TRE2 with the potent xBTEB TRE in the context of the TH/bZIP promoter
did not change the overall early/late kinetics, although the final
induction level was higher (Fig. 4C
). In addition, cotransfection of
expression plasmids for xTR
or xTRß resulted in higher final
levels of induction but only after this initial slow response phase
(Fig. 4D
). We conclude that sequences in the TH/bZIP promoter other
than the TREs account for the characteristic early/late response of the
TH/bZIP gene.
Analysis of the TH/bZIP Promoter in Transgenic X.
laevis Tadpoles
The ultimate test of a proposed regulatory sequences role in
governing the expression of a gene is its ability to direct proper
temporal and spatial expression of a reporter gene in a living animal.
A new transgenic method developed for X. laevis (23) has
become a powerful tool to over- or misexpress wild-type or mutated
proteins that play a role in early development (23) or metamorphosis
(31).
We tested the ability of the TH/bZIP promoter to mediate faithful
induction of a transgene in transgenic tadpoles. The TH-inducible
TH/bZIP B promoter region used in the above transient transfection
studies was inserted upstream of the green fluorescent protein (GFP)
cDNA (32). We created more than 20 transgenic tadpoles by sperm nuclear
transplantation as described previously (23, 31). Ten of these tadpoles
were treated with TH. Six became strongly fluorescent, two weakly
fluoresced, and two did not respond. GFP expression was only detected
in T3-treated animals (Fig. 5
, A and B). Strong expression was
observed in the brain (especially the ventricles, Fig. 5E
), various
cartilages in the head including Meckels cartilage, and the
ceratohyals (Fig. 5
, A and B), the intestine (Fig. 5F
), and the limb
buds (Fig. 5D
). Low level expression is seen in the epidermis as well.
In the tail, the highest expression is in the spinal cord and inside
the notochord (Fig. 5C
). The expression pattern of
the transgene is in excellent agreement with previously described
in situ and Northern hybridization patterns for TH/bZIP (15, 19, 33, 34, 35). In particular, the TH/bZIP promoter drives transgene
expression in areas that proliferate in response to TH. No expression
was seen in larval muscle or gills, which do not express TH/bZIP
normally (34, 35). All animals that were positive for transgene
expression showed the same pattern of induction. In addition,
transgenic animals carrying the TH/bZIP promoter whose TREs had been
deleted did not show any detectable expression before or after
T3 treatment (data not shown).

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5. Expression of the TH/bZIP Promoter Transgene during
Induced Metamorphosis
Transgenic X. laevis tadpoles were created using the
TH/bZIP B gene promoter (-246 to +130, including the two TREs) driving
the expression of a GFP cDNA. Stage 45 transgenic tadpoles (1 week old)
were treated with (+T3, A and B and CF) and without
(-T3, A and B) 30 nM T3 for 1
week. Panel A, Ventral view of transgenic tadpole under UV light before
and after T3 treatment. P, Pronephros; L, lens; HL,
hindlimb; I, intestine; FL, forelimb; B, brain; CH, ceratohyals
(cartilage); MC, Meckels cartilage. Panel B, Same view as in panel A,
with some added white light to visualize animals. Panel C, Higher
magnification view of the side of the tail (+T3). NC,
Notochord cells; SC, spinal cord. Panel D, Higher magnification view of
hindlimb buds (+T3). Panel E, Higher magnification view of
dorsal head (+T3). Note high expression of the transgene in
ventricles of the brain. Panel F, Higher magnification view of
intestine, dissected out of the animal to avoid pigment.
|
|
The other 10 transgenic tadpoles carrying the wild-type TH/bZIP
promoter driving GFP were observed as they underwent spontaneous
metamorphosis about 1 month later. Four tadpoles activated GFP
expression strongly at metamorphic climax (Fig. 6
), two did so weakly, and four showed no
detectable fluorescence. The onset of transgene expression at stage
59/60 coincided well with the stage when the endogenous TH/bZIP genes
are activated (15). Tissues where GFP expression was highest included
proliferating and differentiating cartilage of the head, and
differentiating adult muscle of the head and limbs. Overall, transgene
expression was much higher in the body, the brain, and the intestine,
all sites of normal TH/bZIP expression. While TH/bZIP mRNA disappears
at later stages of metamorphosis in the intestine (19), we observed
induced GFP expression in the above tissues even in newly metamorphosed
froglets. Consistent with in situ hybridization data (34),
transgene expression in the tail was limited to lines of fluorescence
around larval muscle (Fig. 6B
), as well as deeper spinal cord and
notochord expression. We consistently observed strong transgene
expression in the epiphyseal growth plates of the bones in limbs and
digits (Fig. 6C
), another area of proliferating and differentiating
cartilage.

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6. Expression of the TH/bZIP Promoter Transgene during
Spontaneous Metamorphosis
A, Stage 62 TH/bZIP B promoter-GFP transgenic tadpole under UV light,
ventral view. FL, Forelimb; HL, hindlimb. B, View of dorsal tail. *,
Streaks of GFP expression along larval muscle. C, Closeup of hindlimb
foot. White circle, localized GFP expression at ends of
ossifying bone, which are likely epiphyseal growth plates.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION
|
---|
Amphibian metamorphosis is an excellent model system in which to
understand the molecular basis of TH action in vertebrates,
particularly during development. Similarities between amphibians and
mammals include the role of the pituitary-thyroid negative feedback
loop and the structure and relative biological efficacy of the thyroid
hormones themselves (36). TH synthesis by the thyroid gland is
inhibited by the same goitrogens that function in mammals. Amphibian
TR
and TRß are closely homologous with their counterparts in all
vertebrates studied to date (7). The change from tadpole to frog is
entirely dependent upon endogenous TH. Metamorphosis can be induced
precociously simply by adding TH to the rearing medium, manipulations
that are difficult if not impossible for higher vertebrates in
developmental contexts. Because of the accessibility of amphibian
tadpoles, it has been possible to identify many genes that are up- and
down-regulated dramatically by TH during metamorphosis (2, 3). Many of
the genes that have been studied in mammals as TH-response genes
respond only after days of treatment, and their up-regulation has not
been shown to require protein synthesis so it is not certain that they
are direct TH-response genes (16, 37). In many cases, TH-response genes
in mammals are only up-regulated a few fold over baseline. It has been
difficult to derive generalizations about the contribution of the TREs
and flanking regulatory sequences to the speed and magnitude of TH
responses because no systematic studies of the mechanisms of induction
of different classes of response genes within the same cell have been
undertaken (22). For this reason, we have begun a study of the
mechanism of transcriptional activation of the most dramatically
up-regulated genes from different kinetic classes that were identified
in the screen for TH-induced genes during X. laevis
metamorphosis.
Even though xBTEB, TRß, and TH/bZIP are direct response genes as
determined by at least partial resistance to cycloheximide when induced
with exogenous TH, the kinetics of their spontaneous and induced
up-regulation are very different. xBTEB and TRß respond rapidly to TH
induction, while the TH/bZIP genes have an early low level of
up-regulation, followed several hours later by the greatest part of the
response. This delayed mRNA accumulation parallels those of the latest
responding genes in the tail resorption program that is expressed
completely by 48 h. During spontaneous metamorphosis, the TH/bZIP
genes are among the latest to be induced in the tail and in other
tissues. TH/bZIP expression sharply rises only at metamorphic climax,
several days after early response genes have been induced in response
to rising, circulating TH levels. Thus, it was formally possible that
the TH/bZIP genes did not contain TREs or they were very weak,
requiring the up-regulation of TRß before full transcriptional
activation could be achieved.
The TREs, Flanking Sequences, and the Timing of TH Induction
We find that both duplicated copies of the TH/bZIP gene contain
bona fide TREs in their conserved promoters just upstream of their TATA
boxes. They are identical in sequence and position in these two
coordinately regulated genes that were duplicated and began to diverge
some 30 million years ago (38). The TH/bZIP TREs bind with relatively
high affinity to TR/RXR heterodimers and confer strong TH inducibility
on a heterologous promoter. At least one of these TREs must be present
to achieve activation of the native TH/bZIP promoter in transient
transfection assays (Fig. 4
) or in transgenic tadpoles (Figs. 5
and 6
).
Two simple possibilities for the differential induction between early
response genes and the TH/bZIP genes are the different relative binding
affinities of their respective TREs for TRs or a preference of the
TH/bZIP TREs for TRß over TR
. This is an important consideration
because during metamorphosis TRß protein appears before the large
secondary activation of TH/bZIP (13). No biochemical differences were
noted between TR
and TRß binding to the TH/bZIP TREs. In addition,
a transient transfection assay in a cell line that up-regulates its
endogenous TRß gene from a low baseline demonstrated strong and rapid
TH induction of early and early/late gene TREs in a heterologous
promoter (Figs. 3D
and 4
). Moreover, both the single xBTEB TRE and the
coupled TH/bZIP TREs respond to TH with very similar time courses and
dose-response curves when they are inserted into the same
heterologous promoter. Our data suggest that the different kinetic
responses of the two kinds of TH-inducible genes cannot be accounted
for by their slightly different TRE configurations.
DNA sequences flanking hormone response elements have been shown to
affect the specificity and magnitude of a transcriptional response to a
given hormone (39, 40). In fact, the promoters and enhancer
sequences of the early and the biphasic X. laevis TH
response genes cloned so far are markedly different. The TH/bZIP genes
have a TATA box while the xBTEB and TRß genes do not. Binding sites
for additional transcription factors differ between the promoters of
the two kinetic classes of genes. In particular, the region in which
the TH/bZIP TREs are embedded contains a striking number of potential
GAGA factor sites that have been found near a number of
Drosophila genes that rearrange their chromatin upon
induction (41). Paradoxically, GAGA factor bound constitutively to
Drosophila heat shock genes is proposed to allow rapid
induction by opening chromatin to allow constitutive heat shock
transcription factor access (42). Also, GAGA factor sites are found in
the promoter of the early ecdysone response gene E74 in
Drosophila (43), and the early TH-response gene
stromelysin-3 in X. laevis (44). Although no vertebrate GAGA
factor homolog has been isolated yet, we detected specific, but
constitutive, specific binding of proteins from tadpole brain and tail
nuclear extracts to TH/bZIP GAGA sequences (data not shown).
The induction of other transcription factors that work in parallel with
the TRs may also be required for the early/late profile of the TH/bZIP
genes. No obvious sites for known induced transcription factors other
than TRß were observed in the TH/bZIP promoter by sequence analysis,
but not all of the induced transcription factor genes may have been
cloned by previous subtractive hybridization and candidate gene
approaches. A GC-rich sequence located at the transcription start site
may warrant more investigation, since the TH-induced xBTEB
transcription factor binds to related GC-rich sequences. However, the
abundant, ubiquitous, and constitutively expressed Sp1
transcription factor effectively masks xBTEB binding to such sites in
in vitro DNA binding assays using various tissue and
cultured cell extracts (J. D. Furlow, A. Kanamori, and D. D.
Brown, manuscript in preparation). Finally, other non-DNA binding
factors, such as induced TR coactivators (45), may be involved.
In Vivo Analysis of TH-Regulated Gene Expression during
Metamorphosis
Transient transfection assays provide a rapid and sensitive means
to test large numbers of constructs for regulation by a particular
hormone or other regulator. The major limitation of these assays is the
inability to gain a clear understanding of how a gene is regulated in
different cell types, at different times of development, or under the
influence of proper cell connections to the extracellular matrix and
adjacent cells. In addition, transfected plasmids are not properly
wrapped in chromatin (46). This may have misleading consequences in
interpreting results of transfection studies to fully understand the
spatial and temporal transcriptional regulation of an endogenous gene
of interest. Recently, a series of studies were conducted on the
Xenopus TRßA gene promoter and its associated TRE, which
was assembled into chromatin upon injection into Xenopus
oocytes (10, 47, 48, 49). First, these studies suggest that repression of
the TRßA promoter in the absence of TH is the result of the assembly
of a repressive chromatin state over start site mediated by unliganded
TR/RXR. This repression is at least partly dependent on histone
deacetylase activity (10, 49). Second, transcriptional activation in
this system involves the localized disruption of chromatin structure,
but that process alone may not completely explain hormone-regulated
transcriptional activation (48). In light of these findings, the
delayed kinetics of the TH/bZIP genes may be the result of a more
completely repressed state to overcome than is found in early response
genes, requiring qualitative or quantitative differences in the
assembly of chromatin remodeling complexes at early/late promoters.
Repression of the TH/bZIP genes until metamorphosis is probably more
complicated than assembly of repressive chromatin mediated by TR/RXR
complexes because the genes are silent throughout the entire length of
embryonic and larval development until TH levels peak at metamorphic
climax.
The new transgenic technique for X. laevis integrates DNA
before first cleavage so that the construct is replicated along with
host chromatin (23). The ability to create large numbers of transgenic
animals presents a new way to analyze the transcriptional regulation of
genes integrated in chromatin in all cells of a live, developing
animal. This is demonstrated by the faithful expression of a reporter
gene in patterns that are highly similar to the known expression
patterns of the endogenous TH/bZIP genes (Figs. 5
and 6
). The TREs are
required for the regulation of these genes not only in vitro
but also in vivo. Because of the variability of levels of
expression between individuals and the stability of the GFP protein,
the subtle kinetics of TH induction can not be done currently in
F0 animals using this reporter. However, this method
provides a rapid screen for the role of TRE-flanking sequences in the
developmentally and spatially restricted up-regulation of this
transcription factor gene. Most importantly, we can envision using this
methodology to determine the in vivo roles of TR isoforms
and other constitutive and induced transcription factors in governing
the precise TH-mediated regulation of the TH/bZIP and other response
genes at metamorphosis.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS
|
---|
Northern and Southern Blot Hybridization
Stage 50 X. laevis tadpoles were treated with 100
nM T3 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) added
directly to the water for the indicated lengths of time. Total RNA from
tail and limb buds was isolated and analyzed by Northern hybridization
as described previously (50). Ten micrograms of total RNA were loaded
for each time point. Radiolabeled probes were obtained from +1 to +750
of xBTEB cDNA, +249 to +1434 of TH/bZIP B, +248 to +1318 of xTRßA1
cDNA (7), and the full-length rpL8 cDNA (51). After washing, blots were
analyzed using a Storm PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) and IMAGEQUANT Version 1.2 software. The
mRNA for rpL8 is constant during development (51), so hybridization
signals were normalized to rpL8 expression at each time point.
For Southern blot analysis, 10 µg homozygous diploid genomic X.
laevis DNA (24) was digested with restriction enzymes and
electrophoresed on a 0.7% agarose gel. The gel was transferred to
Nytran Plus nylon membranes (Schleicher & Schuell, Inc.,
Keene, NH) (52) and hybridized with DNA from within exon 1 (-246 to
+130) of TH/bZIP B using previously described hybridization conditions
(15).
Genomic Cloning
A homozygous diploid X. laevis genomic DNA library
(gift of Keith Joho) in
GEM-11 vector (Promega Corp.,
Madison, WI) was screened using a full-length (2.1 kb) TH/bZIP A cDNA
probe as described (53). Partially purified
phage DNA from clones
that were still positive after three rounds of screening was isolated
from 250 ml liquid cultures (52).
DNA was further purified by RNase
A digestion, polyethylene glycol precipitation, phenol/chloroform
extraction, and ethanol precipitation with ammonium acetate.
Restriction maps of the genomic clones and approximate positions of
coding sequences were determined by digestion with various restriction
enzymes followed by Southern hybridization with primers specific to
each end of the vector or to TH/bZIP cDNA sequences. PCR using
Taq extender (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), and
combinations of vector and cDNA-derived primers determined orientation
and position of the exons. Genomic clones and plasmid-based subclones
were sequenced using gene-specific primers by automated sequencing
(PE Applied Biosystems, Norwalk, CT). Potential
transcription factor binding sites were identified by analyzing the
TH/bZIP gene sequences using the Signal Scan program on the NIH World
Wide Web server, Signal Scan (54), and the TFD (55) and TRANSFAC
(56) databases.
In Vitro Translation of Receptor Proteins
Capped X. laevis TR
and TRß mRNAs were
synthesized in vitro as described previously (13). X.
laevis RXR
cDNA was obtained as a gift from B. Blumberg and E.
DeRobertis (57), and xRXRß cDNA was a gift from R. Old (58). The
coding sequences of xRXR
and xRXRß were PCR amplified and
subcloned into pSP64A (Promega Corp.) for in
vitro transcription. Cold or [35S]methionine-labeled
receptor proteins were produced by in vitro translation of 2
µg mRNA in wheat germ extract (Promega Corp.) as
described previously (13). Production of full-length receptor protein
was assessed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography (data not shown). We
typically produce 200,000500,000 trichloroacetic acid-precipitable
cpm/µl with a 1545% efficiency of incorporation.
Gel Shift Assays
Reverse gel shift assays were performed as described by Urness
and Thummel (26) with some modifications. Purified
DNA from
individual genomic clones,
GEM-11 DNA (Promega Corp.),
and genomic subclones in pBluescript II KS- (Stratagene)
were digested with RsaI or AluI and purified by
phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. Digested
DNA (1.5 µg) or about 0.2 µg digested plasmid DNA (6 x
10-14 M, 4 nM final DNA
concentration) was mixed with 0.5 µl in vitro translated
35S-labeled TR
or ß and 1 µl unlabeled, in
vitro translated RXR
or -ß or unprogrammed wheat germ extract
in binding buffer [20 mM Tris Cl, (pH 7.6), 150
mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 1
mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol) and sonicated 1
µg poly(dI-dC) in a final volume of 15 µl. After incubation at room
temperature for 30 min, the reactions were cooled on ice, mixed with 5
µl loading buffer (26), and loaded on prerun 4% (29:1)
polyacrylamide gels in 0.5x Tris-borate-EDTA (TBE). The gels
were electrophoresed in 0.5 x TBE at 200 V at 4 C for 2 h,
fixed for 1 h in 50% methanol/10% acetic acid, rehydrated with
water for 10 min, dried under vacuum, and autoradiographed.
For standard gel shift assays (cold protein, labeled DNA),
oligonucleotides were annealed by heating in 10 mM Tris Cl
(pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl to 90 C for 10
min and then cooled over several hours to room temperature for use as
probes or unlabeled competitor. Both strands are shown for the DR+4
oligonucleotide; only the top strand (5'-3') is shown for the
rest of the oligonucleotides. Each annealed oligo had a
5'-HindIII overhang for end labeling or cloning (see below).
TRE half-sites are bold; mutated bases are
underlined:
DR+4 TRE:
5'-ACGTTCAGGGAAGGTCATCTGAGGTCACAGCTTA-3' 3'-AGTCCCTTCCAGTAGACTCCAGTGTCGAATTCGA-5'
xBTEB TRE:
ACGTTCAGGGAAGTTCATCTGAGGACACAGCTTA
bZIP TRE1:
AGCTTGCACTAGGGTTAAGTAAGGTGAAT-GCTCA
bZIP mTRE1:
AGCTTGCACTAGGGTTAAGTAATTTGAAT-GCTCA
bZIP TRE2:
AGCTTAATGCTCAGCCTCATTTGAACTCT-GTAGA
bZIP mTRE2:
AGCTTAATGCTCAGTTTCATTTGAACTCT-GTAGA
bZIP TRE1
+TRE2:
AGCTTGGGTTAAGTAAGGTGAATGCTCAGCC-TCATTTGAACTCTG
bZIP mTRE1
+TRE2:
AGCTTGGGTTAAGTAATTTGAATGCTCAGCCT-CATTTGAACTCTG
bZIP TRE1
+mTRE2:
AGCTTGGGTTAAGTAAGGTGAATGCTCAGT-TTCATTTGAACTCTG
bZIP mTRE1
+mTRE2:
AGCTTGGGTTAAGTAATTTGAATGCTCAGTT-TCATTTGAACTCTG
GH TRE:
AGCTTAAAGGTAAGATCAGGGACGTGACCG-CAGA
Random: AGCTTCTAAAAAACGTTATGTAACGGA
The wild-type xBTEB TRE oligo was end labeled by filling in with
32P-dCTP, cold dATP, dGTP, and dTTP, and the Klenow
fragment of DNA polymerase. Labeled oligos were purified using G-25
spin columns (52). Reactions were carried out under the same conditions
as for reverse shift assays, this time using 1 µl each unlabeled
xTR
and RXR
, binding buffer with 150 mM KCl, 1 µg
sonicated poly(dI-dC), 10% glycerol, a constant amount of labeled
wild-type xBTEB TRE (30,000 cpm), and with or without a 1000-fold molar
excess of the indicated cold competitor oligo in a 30 µl reaction
volume. After adding 10 µl 4x loading dye, reactions were
electrophoresed on 6% (29:1) polyacrylamide gels as above. Gels were
dried directly and autoradiographed.
Transient Transfection Assays
TRE-containing constructs were cloned by ligating annealed
oligos (see above) into the single HindIII site of
MTV-luciferase (30). The parent
MTV-luciferase vector was kindly
provided by Ron Evans (Salk Institute, San Diego, CA). DNA from -246
to +130 of TH/bZIP was amplified by PCR (using oligos with incorporated
SacI and XhoI sites) and subcloned into the pGL2
basic vector (Promega Corp.) upstream of the luciferase
gene. The TREs were deleted together or individually by inverse PCR of
the TH/bZIP promoter in pBluescript KS- (Stratagene)
using primers that are oriented in opposite directions, flank the sites
to be deleted, and contain BamHI sites. The religated PCR
products then contain a BamHI site substituted for both
TH/bZIP TREs or TH/bZIP TRE2 alone. For some experiments, the xBTEB TRE
oligo or the TH/bZIP TRE2 oligo were synthesized with BamHI
ends and then ligated into the newly created BamHI sites in
the mutated TH/bZIP constructs lacking TRE2. The mutated TH/bZIP
sequences were then amplified by PCR for cloning into pGL2-Basic as was
done for the wild-type promoter. For cotransfection of TR expression
vectors, xTR
A and xTRßA1 coding sequences were cloned downstream
of the miw promoter (a hybrid RSV LTR and chicken ß-actin
promoter) (59) (gifts of Akira Kanamori, National Research Institute of
Aquaculture, Tamaki, Japan). All constructs were checked for
correct sequence, orientation, and number of TRE inserts by sequencing
as above. Plasmids were purified with Qiagen (Chatsworth,
CA) midiprep kits before transfection.
Monolayer cultures of X. laevis XLA cells were maintained in
70% Liebovitz L-15 medium (Life Technologies, Inc.,
Gaithersburg, MD) with 10% FBS (Life Technologies, Inc.)
at 2426 C with air. For transfection, each well in Falcon six-well
tissue culture plates (Becton Dickinson, Lincoln Park, NJ) was
seeded with 1.5 x 105 cells and grown overnight in
70% L-15 with 10% resin-stripped FBS (60). Cells were transfected by
mixing 0.2 µg reporter construct (TREs in
MTV-Luc) or 0.1 µg
genomic constructs in pGL2 vector and pCS2+ßGalactosidase (a gift of
Dave Turner, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA) to a
final DNA concentration of 1 µg/well with 4 µl/well Lipofectamine
reagent (Life Technologies, Inc.) according to the
instructions of the manufacturer. In cotransfection experiments with
TR
or ß expression vectors, 0.1 µg TH/bZIP promoter-pGL2
was mixed with 0.25 µg pmiwTR
A,
pmiwTRßA1, or the parent pmiw vector as
control. The amount of pCS2+ßGalactosidase was adjusted to yield a
final amount of 1 µg/well transfected DNA. After 24 h, cells
were washed, and incubated with 70% L-15 plus stripped FBS with or
without the indicated T3 concentration. Cells from each
well were harvested at the indicated times by scraping, washing once in
PBS, and lysing in 125 µl 250 mM Tris Cl, pH 7.8, by
three freeze/thaw cycles. Extracts were assayed for luciferase (61) and
ß-galactosidase (52) activity and normalized to total protein in the
extract (Bradford assay kit, Pierce Chemical Co.,
Rockford, IL).
Transgenic X. laevis
-246 to +130 of the wild-type or TRE1 and TRE2 deleted TH/bZIP
promoter was amplified by PCR incorporating XhoI and
HindIII restriction sites on the 5'- and 3'-ends of the
fragment. This fragment was cloned into pCS2+GFP* (a gift of Dave
Turner and Nicholas Marsh-Armstrong, Carnegie Institution of
Washington, Baltimore, MD) at the SalI and
HindIII sites, replacing the cytomegalovirus promoter
with TH/bZIP promoter sequences. The GFP reporter used was a point
mutant containing a serine-to-cysteine switch at amino acid 65 (31).
Transgenic animals were created using NotI-linearized
constructs and NotI restriction enzyme as previously
described (31). Some animals were treated for 1 week with 30
nM T3, and others were allowed to develop
through metamorphosis and observed at 1- to 2-day intervals. Images
were captured before and after T3 treatment and at
metamorphic climax using a Leica Corp. fluorescent
dissecting microscope and video camera as described elsewhere (31).
Large images were assembled using Adobe Pagemaker (Adobe Systems, Inc.,
San Jose, CA).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
|
---|
The authors wish to thank Akira Kanamori and Zhou Wang for their
gifts of various constructs, reagents, and advice during the course of
this work. We are extremely grateful to Haochu Huang and Nick
Marsh-Armstrong for help with the transgenesis protocols. Helpful
criticism of the manuscript by our colleagues is gratefully
acknowledged. Eddie Jordan, Allison Pinder, Benjamin Remo, and Allison
Better provided excellent technical support at various points in the
project.
 |
FOOTNOTES
|
---|
Address requests for reprints to: David Furlow, Section of Neurobiology, Physiology, and Behavior, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616-8519.
This research was supported by a National Research Service Award
fellowship to J.D.F. and grants from the NIH (2 R01 GM-22395)
and the G. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers Charitable Foundation to
D.D.B.
Received for publication June 30, 1999.
Revision received August 16, 1999.
Accepted for publication August 19, 1999.
 |
REFERENCES
|
---|
-
Dodd MHI, Dodd JM 1976 The biology of metamorphosis. In:
Lofts B (ed) Physiology of the Amphibia. Academic Press, New York, pp
467599
-
Brown DD, Wang Z, Furlow JD, Kanamori A, Schwartzman RA, Remo
BF, Pinder A 1996 The thyroid hormone-induced tail resorption program
during Xenopus laevis metamorphosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:19241929[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Shi YB 1996 Thyroid hormone-regulated early and late genes
during amphibian metamorphosis. In: Gilbert LI, Tata JR, Atkinson BG
(eds) Metamorphosis: Post-embryonic Reprogramming of Gene Expression in
Amphibian and Insect Cells. Academic Press, New York, pp 505538
-
Tata JR 1966 Requirement for RNA and protein synthesis for
induced regression of the tadpole tail in organ culture. Dev Biol 13:7794[Medline]
-
Sap J, Munoz A, Damm K, Goldberg Y, Ghysdael J, Leutz A, Beug
H, Vennstrom B 1986 The c-erb-A protein is a high-affinity receptor for
thyroid hormone. Nature 324:635640[Medline]
-
Weinberger C, Thompson CC, Ong ES, Lebo R, Gruol DJ, Evans RM 1986 The c-erb-A gene encodes a thyroid hormone receptor. Nature 324:641646[Medline]
-
Yaoita Y, Shi YB, Brown DD 1990 Xenopus laevis
and ß thyroid hormone receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:70907094[Abstract]
-
Mangelsdorf DJ, Thummel C, Beato M, Herrlich P, Schutz G,
Umesono K, Blumberg B, Kastner P, Mark M, Chambon P 1995 The
nuclear receptor superfamily: the second decade. Cell 83:835839[Medline]
-
Wong J, Shi YB 1995 Coordinated regulation of and
transcriptional activation by Xenopus thyroid hormone and
retinoid X receptors. J Biol Chem 270:1847918483[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wong J, Shi YB, Wolffe AP 1995 A role for nucleosome assembly
in both silencing and activation of the Xenopus TR ß A
gene by the thyroid hormone receptor. Genes Dev 9:26962711[Abstract]
-
Yaoita Y, Brown DD 1990 A correlation of thyroid hormone
receptor gene expression with amphibian metamorphosis. Genes Dev 4:19171924[Abstract]
-
Kawahara A, Baker BS, Tata JR 1991 Developmental and regional
expression of thyroid hormone receptor genes during Xenopus
metamorphosis. Development 112:933943[Abstract]
-
Eliceiri BP, Brown DD 1994 Quantitation of endogenous thyroid
hormone receptors
and ß during embryogenesis and metamorphosis in
Xenopus laevis. J Biol Chem 269:2445924465[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wang Z, Brown DD 1991 A gene expression screen. Proc Natl Acad
Sci USA 88:1150511509[Abstract]
-
Wang Z, Brown DD 1993 Thyroid hormone-induced gene expression
program for amphibian tail resorption. J Biol Chem 268:1627016278[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kanamori A, Brown DD 1992 The regulation of thyroid hormone
receptor ß genes by thyroid hormone in Xenopus laevis.
J Biol Chem 267:739745[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ranjan M, Wong J, Shi YB 1994 Transcriptional repression of
Xenopus TR ß gene is mediated by a thyroid hormone
response element located near the start site. J Biol Chem 269:2469924705[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ishizuya-Oka A, Ueda S, Shi YB 1997 Temporal and spatial
regulation of a putative transcriptional repressor implicates it as
playing a role in thyroid hormone-dependent organ transformation. Dev
Genet 20:329337[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Shi YB, Brown DD 1993 The earliest changes in gene expression
in tadpole intestine induced by thyroid hormone. J Biol Chem 268:2031220317[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Graf JD, Kobel HR 1991 Genetics of Xenopus laevis.
Methods Cell Biol 36:1934[Medline]
-
Thummel CS 1996 Files on steroidsDrosophila
metamorphosis and the mechanisms of steroid hormone action. Trends
Genet 12:306310[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Dean DM, Sanders MM 1996 Ten years after: reclassification of
steroid-responsive genes. Mol Endocrinol 10:14891495[Abstract]
-
Kroll KL, Amaya E 1996 Transgenic Xenopus embryos
from sperm nuclear transplantations reveal FGF signaling requirements
during gastrulation. Development 122:31733183[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Krotoski DM, Reinschmidt DC, Tompkins R 1985 Developmental
mutants isolated from wild-caught Xenopus laevis by
gynogenesis and inbreeding. J Exp Zool 233:443449[Medline]
-
Hope IA, Struhl K 1985 GCN4 protein, synthesized in
vitro, binds HIS3 regulatory sequences: implications for general
control of amino acid biosynthetic genes in yeast. Cell 43:177188[Medline]
-
Urness LD, Thummel CS 1990 Molecular interactions within the
ecdysone regulatory hierarchy: DNA binding properties of the
Drosophila ecdysone-inducible E74A protein. Cell 63:4761[Medline]
-
Umesono K, Murakami KK, Thompson CC, Evans RM 1991 Direct
repeats as selective response elements for the thyroid hormone,
retinoic acid, and vitamin D3 receptors. Cell 65:12551266[Medline]
-
Kurokawa R, Yu VC, Naar A, Kyakumoto S, Han Z, Silverman S,
Rosenfeld MG, Glass CK 1993 Differential orientations of the
DNA-binding domain and carboxy-terminal dimerization interface regulate
binding site selection by nuclear receptor heterodimers. Genes Dev 7:14231435[Abstract]
-
Katz RW, Koenig RJ 1993 Nonbiased identification of DNA
sequences that bind thyroid hormone receptor
1 with high affinity.
J Biol Chem 268:1939219397[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hollenberg SM, Evans RM 1988 Multiple and cooperative
trans-activation domains of the human glucocorticoid receptor. Cell 55:899906[Medline]
-
Huang H, Marsh-Armstrong N, Brown DD 1999 Metamorphosis is
inhibited in transgenic Xenopus laevis tadpoles that
overexpress type III deiodinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:962967[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chalfie M, Tu Y, Euskirchen G, Ward WW, Prasher DC 1994 Green
fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression. Science 263:802805[Medline]
-
Denver RJ, Pavgi S, Shi YB 1997 Thyroid hormone-dependent gene
expression program for Xenopus neural development. J
Biol Chem 272:81798188[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Berry DL, Rose CS, Remo BF, Brown DD 1998 The expression
pattern of thyroid hormone response genes in remodeling tadpole tissues
defines distinct growth and resorption gene expression programs. Dev
Biol 203:2435[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Berry DL, Schwartzman RA, Brown DD 1998 The expression pattern
of thyroid hormone response genes in the tadpole tail identifies
multiple resorption programs. Dev Biol 203:1223[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Kikuyama S, Kawamura K, Tanaka S, Yamamoto K 1993 Aspects of
amphibian metamorphosis: hormonal control. Int Rev Cytol 145:105148[Medline]
-
Santos A, Perez-Castillo A, Wong NC, Oppenheimer JH 1987 Labile proteins are necessary for T3 induction of growth hormone mRNA
in normal rat pituitary and rat pituitary tumor cells. J Biol Chem 262:1688016884[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bisbee CA, Baker MA, Wilson AC, Haji-Azimi I, Fischberg M 1977 Albumin phylogeny for clawed frogs (Xenopus). Science 195:785787[Medline]
-
Lucas PC, Granner DK 1992 Hormone response domains in gene
transcription. Annu Rev Biochem 61:11311173[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Robins DM, Scheller A, Adler AJ 1994 Specific steroid response
from a nonspecific DNA element. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 49:251255[CrossRef]
-
Lis J, Wu C 1993 Protein traffic on the heat shock promoter:
parking, stalling, and trucking along. Cell 74:14[Medline]
-
Tsukiyama T, Becker PB, Wu C 1994 ATP-dependent nucleosome
disruption at a heat-shock promoter mediated by binding of GAGA
transcription factor. Nature 367:525532[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Soeller WC, Oh CE, Kornberg TB 1993 Isolation of cDNAs
encoding the Drosophila GAGA transcription factor. Mol Cell
Biol 13:79617970[Abstract]
-
Li J, Liang VC, Sedgwick T, Wong J, Shi YB 1998 Unique
organization and involvement of GAGA factors in transcriptional
regulation of the Xenopus stromelysin-3 gene. Nucleic Acids
Res 26:30183025[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Freedman LP 1999 Increasing the complexity of coactivation in
nuclear receptor signaling. Cell 97:58[Medline]
-
Smith CL, Hager GL 1997 Transcriptional regulation of
mammalian genes in vivo. A tale of two templates. J
Biol Chem 272:2749327496[Free Full Text]
-
Wong J, Li Q, Levi BZ, Shi YB, Wolffe AP 1997 Structural and
functional features of a specific nucleosome containing a recognition
element for the thyroid hormone receptor. EMBO J 16:71307145[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wong J, Shi YB, Wolffe AP 1997 Determinants of chromatin
disruption and transcriptional regulation instigated by the thyroid
hormone receptor: hormone-regulated chromatin disruption is not
sufficient for transcriptional activation. EMBO J 16:31583171[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wong J, Patterton D, Imhof A, Guschin D, Shi YB, Wolffe AP 1998 Distinct requirements for chromatin assembly in transcriptional
repression by thyroid hormone receptor and histone deacetylase. EMBO J 17:520534[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Furlow JD, Berry DL, Wang Z, Brown DD 1997 A set of novel
tadpole specific genes expressed only in the epidermis are
down-regulated by thyroid hormone during Xenopus laevis
metamorphosis. Dev Biol 182:284298[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Shi YB, Liang VC 1994 Cloning and characterization of the
ribosomal protein L8 gene from Xenopus laevis. Biochim
Biophys Acta 1217:227228[Medline]
-
Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T 1989 Molecular Cloning: A
Laboratory Manual, ed. 2. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor,
NY
-
Shi YB, Yaoita Y, Brown DD 1992 Genomic organization and
alternative promoter usage of the two thyroid hormone receptor ß
genes in Xenopus laevis. J Biol Chem 267:733738[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Prestridge DS 1991 SIGNAL SCAN: a computer program that scans
DNA sequences for eukaryotic transcriptional elements. Comput Appl
Biosci 7:203206[Abstract]
-
Ghosh D 1990 A relational database of transcription factors.
Nucleic Acids Res 18:17491756[Abstract]
-
Heinemeyer T, Wingender E, Reuter I, Hermjakob H, Kel AE, Kel
OV, Ignatieva EV, Ananko EA, Podkolodnaya OA, Kolpakov FA, Podkolodny
NL, Kolchanov NA 1998 Databases on transcriptional regulation:
TRANSFAC, TRRD and COMPEL. Nucleic Acids Res 26:362367[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Blumberg B, Mangelsdorf DJ, Dyck JA, Bittner DA, Evans RM, De
Robertis EM 1992 Multiple retinoid-responsive receptors in a single
cell: families of retinoid "X" receptors and retinoic acid
receptors in the Xenopus egg. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:23212325[Abstract]
-
Marklew S, Smith DP, Mason CS, Old RW 1994 Isolation of a
novel RXR from Xenopus that most closely resembles mammalian
RXR ß and is expressed throughout early development. Biochim Biophys
Acta 1218:267272[Medline]
-
Nakamura A, Okumura J, Muramatsu T 1998 Quantitative analysis
of luciferase activity of viral and hybrid promoters in bovine
preimplantation embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 49:368373[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Samuels HH, Stanley F, Casanova J 1979 Depletion of
L-3,5,3'-triiodothyronine and L-thyroxine in
euthyroid calf serum for use in cell culture studies of the action of
thyroid hormone. Endocrinology 105:8085[Abstract]
-
Brasier AR, Tate JE, Habener JF 1989 Optimized use of the
firefly luciferase assay as a reporter gene in mammalian cell lines.
Biotechniques 7:11161122[Medline]