* Department of Neuroscience, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
Biomedical Research and Study Centre, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
Service of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
Correspondence: E-mail: helgis{at}bmc.uu.se.
![]() |
Abstract |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key Words: GPCR ACTH AGRP MSH melanocortin receptor
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The G-proteincoupled receptors (GPCRs) are one of the largest protein families in vertebrate genomes and are the single most pursued group of proteins in drug discovery. There exist over 800 GPCR genes in the human genome and about 40% to 50% of modern drugs are targeted at these receptors. Despite this and the mounting genetic information, only few GPCR families from lower vertebrates have been pharmacologically characterized. The melanocortin receptors (MCRs) are GPCRs and belong to the rhodopsin group (Fredriksson et al. 2003). MCRs respond to the pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) cleavage products melanocyte-stimulating hormones (-MSH, ß-MSH, and
-MSH) and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), all of them possessing agonistic properties on MCRs. The MC system is unique in the sense that it also has two endogenous antagonists named agouti (ASIP) and agouti-related peptide (AGRP). There are five subtypes of MCRs in mammals and aves named MC1R to MC5R (for review see Schiöth [2001]) (Gantz and Fong 2003). In mammals, MC1R is expressed in melanocytes and has a main role in determination of skin and hair pigmentation by regulation of the dark eumelanin synthesis, as a response to
-MSH (Rana et al. 1999). Binding of the antagonist ASIP, however, inactivates the signalling pathway and leads to synthesis of yellow phaeomelanin (Lu et al. 1994). Expression of the MC1R is also detected in other cell types of skin and in a number of peripheral tissues and cells (Chhajlani 1996), including leukocytes, where it mediates the broad anti-inflammatory actions, prompting interest from the pharmaceutical industry to find agonist at the MC1R. The MC2R is expressed in adrenal cortex, where it mediates the effects of ACTH on steroid secretion. The mammalian MC2R differs pharmacologically from other MCRs in that it is activated only by ACTH and has no affinity for MSH peptides (Schiöth et al. 1996). Some expression of MC2R has been found in human adipose tissue, but its role in this tissue is not clear. The MC3R and MC4R are expressed in several brain regions, particularly in the hypothalamus. These receptors have gained great attention during past years because of their involvement in regulation of energy homeostasis. The MC4R is one of the best-characterized monogenic factors of obesity. A number of mutations in this receptor lead to obese phenotypes in humans (Vaisse et al. 1998; Farooqi et al. 2000; Miraglia Del Giudice et al. 2002). Although both receptors are involved in regulation of the energy balance, mice deficient in one of these receptors display different phenotypes (Huszar et al. 1997, Chen et al. 2000). They also differ in pharmacology, as the MC3R has unique preference for
-MSH among different subtypes of MCRs. MC5R is expressed in a number of human peripheral tissues, including adrenal gland, adipocytes, leukocytes, and others (Chhajlani 1996). The functional properties of MC5R are, however, still not well understood, with the exception of its participation in exocrine function, regulating sebaceous gland secretion in mice (Chen et al. 1997).
The MSH peptides have been intensively studied in lower vertebrates, and it seems that the POMC gene has arisen early in chordate evolution. Two copies of this gene are found in several ray-finned fish species (Okuta et al. 1996; Danielson et al. 1999) and lamprey (Takahashi et al. 1995). It is more likely, however, that the duplications in ray-finned fishes are late evolutionary event and do not represent an ancestry organization of this gene (Danielson et al. 1999). All fish POMC genes contain -MSH, ß-MSH, and ACTH. These sequences, especially that of
-MSH, are very conserved among different vertebrate species. Notable is that the
-MSH region in ray-finned fishes is quite variable and degenerate, either missing the
-MSH core motif (Amemiya et al. 1997; Dores et al. 1997) or even the complete
-MSH sequence (Kitahara et al. 1988; Lee et al. 1999). AGRP has been found in chicken (Takeuchi, Teshigawara, and Takahashi 2000), but the evolutionary origin of AGRP or ASIP is obscure.
Our group has recently cloned the MC4R from zebrafish, goldfish, and dogfish and the MC5R from zebrafish (Ringholm et al. 2002, Cerda-Reverter et al. 2003, Ringholm et al. 2003), indicating high conservation in structure and pharmacology of these two receptors. We also found that MC4R is involved in central regulation of food intake in goldfish (Cerda-Reverter et al. 2003). No functional information is however available about the other MCR subtypes in nonmammalian species. Comparative pharmacological analysis of the entire MCR repertoire has not been previously performed beyond the mammalian lineage.
In this paper we report the identification of the full repertoire of Fugu MCR genes and their ligands. We describe genomic structure, synteny with the human genome, and determine the pharmacological profile and anatomical distribution of the receptors, including the first characterization of MC1R and MC2R from any nonmammalian species and delineate the vertebrate evolution of the MCR system.
![]() |
Materials and Methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Comparative Synteny Analysis Between Fugu and Human
Sequence from MCR and AGRP containing Fugu scaffolds were used in repeated BlastN search against different releases of genome shotgun sequence data sets. Identified scaffolds were downloaded and assembled to extend the sequence around the genes of interest. Sequences were assembled manually, based on results of pairwise Blast. Four contigs were obtained containing the following scaffolds (scaffolds starting with M represent Assembly release 3; scaffolds starting with S represent Assembly release 2): MC1R (M000431, S000194), MC2R and MC5R (M001144, M003114, M000533, S003468, S001069, S002629), MC4 (M000683, M000622, S000593, S000417, S002052), and AGRP (M 003097, S000686). Assembled contigs were subjected to Genscan analysis. Obtained protein sequences were individually compared with human genome assembly at NCBI using BlastP. Sequence similarity was evaluated based on quality and length of the match, including "score" and "Expect" values. Human genome map positions were identified for selected sequences from matching reads athttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mapview/. Identified human sequences were blasted back to Fugu genome databases using TBlastN to ensure the correctness of similarity and search for putative duplicate genes. Additional human genes within and from the surrounding of the established synteny regions were used to search against Fugu databases using TBlastN to identify Fugu genes not predicted by Genscan. This search, however, did not produce any results on scaffolds included in assembled contigs.
Cloning and Sequencing
The MCR sequences were amplified with Pfu Turbo DNA polymerase (Stratagene) from genomic DNA or cDNA. Fugu genomic DNA and a whole animal for tissue analysis were provided by Dr. Greg Elgar from Fugu Genomics Group (UK). PCR products were purified from 1% agarose gel using Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen), followed by incubation with Taq polymerase (Invitrogen) in a reaction volume of 20 µl, containing 250 µM dATP, 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.4), 50 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2 and were cloned into pCRII vector and transformed into TOP10 cells (TOPO TA-Cloning Kit [Invitrogen]). Where possible, the entire coding sequences, including flanking regions, were cloned into TOPO cloning vector for sequencing. Sequencing reactions were performed using the ABI PRIZM Big Dye Terminator cycle sequencing kit according to the manufacture's recommendations and analyzed on ABI PRIZM-310 or 3100 Automated Sequencers (Applied Biosystems). Sequences were compiled and aligned using the Seqman program from the DNAstar package (Lasergene). Sequences were compared against database assemblies using BlastN and BlastX. For expression, full-length coding sequences were amplified by means of PCR from receptor gene containing TOPO plasmids with Pfu polymerase using HindIII and XhoI restriction sites containing primers for N- terminus and C-terminus, respectively. Obtained fragments were then digested with both restriction enzymes and gel purified before ligation into modified pCEP expression vector (Lundell et al. 2001). All constructs were sequenced to ensure identity of sequence to the original.
Alignments and Phylogenetic Analysis
Alignment of predicted full-length amino acid sequences for identified genes with other known MCR and ligand sequences were made using ClustalW version 1.8 software (Thompson, Higgins, and Gibson 1994). The following sequences (with their accession codes) were retrieved from GenBank for this analysis: Homo sapiens (Hsa) MC1R (NM_002386), MC2R (NM_000529), MC3R (XM_009545), MC4R (NM_005912), MC5R (XM_008685), AGRP (NM_001138), ASIP (NM_001672), Mus musculus (Mmu) AGRP (NM_007427), ASIP (NM_015770), POMC (NM_000939.1) Gallus gallus (Gga) MC1R (D78272), MC2R (AB009605), MC3R (AB017137), MC4R (AB012211), MC5R (AB012868), AGRP (AB029443), POMC (AB019555), Xenopus laevis (Xla), POMC (M11346), Oncorhynchus mykiss (Omy), POMC B (X69809), Danio rerio (Dre) MC1R (NM_180970), MC2R (NM_180971), MC3R (NM_180972), MC4R (AY078989), MC5aR (AY078990) and MC5bR (AY078991), POMC (NM_181438), and Takifugu rubripes (Tru) POMC (AAL11984). The identified genes have the following accession numbers: Takifugu rubripes MC1R (AY227791), MC2R (AY227793), MC4R (AY227794), MC5R (AY227796), and AGRP (BK001439); Tetraodon nigroviridis (Tni) MC1R (AY332238), MC2R (AY332239), MC4R (AY332240), and MC5R (AY332241). Phylogenetic trees were constructed by MEGA version 2.2. (Kumar et al. 2001) using maximum-parsimony and distance neighbor-joining methods. Human cannabinoid 2 receptor (hCB2 [S36750]) was used to root the receptor tree. The outgroup sequence that was used for AGRP/ASIP phylogeny was made artificially from alignment consensus sequence randomizing all positions except the fully conserved ones. Bootstrapping was performed with 1,000 random replicates.
Cell Culture and Transfection
HEK 293-EBNA cells were transfected with 2 to 5 µg of the constructs using FuGENE Transfection Reagent (Roche) according to the manufacturer's instruction. The cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM)/ Nut Mix F-12 with 10% fetal calf serum containing 0.2 mM L-glutamine, 250 µg/ml G-418, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin and 2.5 µg/ml amphotericin B (Gibco BRL). Semistable cell lines were obtained for every construct expressing Fugu MCR by selecting cells for growth on medium containing 100 µg/ml hygromycin B (Invitrogen). Hygromycin was first added to medium 24 h after transfection. The MC2R was expressed in M3 cells. M3 cells were purchased by ATCC and were cultured in Kaighn's modification of Ham's F-12 medium (F-12K) supplemented with 15% horse serum (ATCC), 2.5% fetal bovin serum, and 1% GlutaMAX (Invitrogen). The cells were kept in humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2 at 37°C. One day before transfection, 200 000 cells were plated in 35-mm culture dishes. Transfections were carried out with 1.5 µg DNA using Lipofectamine Reagent PLUS (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Transiently transfected cells were used 72 h after transfection.
Radioligand Binding
HEK 293-EBNA cells expressing Fugu receptors were harvested from plate and resuspended in binding buffer composed of 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) containing 2.5 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, and 0.2 % bacitracin. To obtain the membrane, preparation cells were homogenized using UltraTurrax. The cell suspension was centrifuged for 3 min at 1,300 g and membranes were collected from the supernatant by centrifugation for 15 min at 14,000 g. The pellet was resuspended in binding buffer. The binding was performed in a final volume of 100 µl for 3 h at room temperature. Saturation experiments were carried out with serial dilutions of [125I] (Nle4,D-Phe7) -MSH (NDP-MSH). Nonspecific binding was determined in presence of 1 µM unlabeled NDP-MSH. Competition experiments were performed with constant 0.6 nM concentration of [125I]NDP-MSH and serial dilutions of competing unlabeled ligands: NDP-MSH,
-MSH, ß-MSH,
-MSH, ACTH(1-24), MTII, and HS024 (Neosystem). The membranes were collected by filtration on glass fibre filters, Filtermat A (Wallac), using a TOMTEC Mach III cell harvester (Orange, Conn.). The filters were washed with 5 ml per well of 50 mM TrisHCl (pH 7.4) and dried. MeltiLex A scintillator sheets (Wallac) were melted on dried filters and radioactivity was counted with automatic Microbeta counter 1450 (Wallac). Binding assay was performed in duplicates from at least three independent experiments. Nontransfected cells did not show any specific binding with [125I]NDP-MSH. The results were analysed with the Prism version 3.0 software package (Graphpad).
cAMP Assay in HEK 293 EBNA Cells
Cyclic adenosine 3':5'cyclic monophosphate production was determined on semistable HEK 293 EBNA cells expressing appropriate the MCR. A confluent layer of semistable cells was incubated for 3 h with 2.5 µCi of [3H]ATP (specific activity 29 Ci/mmol [Amersham]) per ml of medium. Cells were collected, washed with PBS, and incubated for 10 min in PBS containing 0.5 mM isobutylmethylxanthine (IBMX) (Sigma). Stimulation reaction was performed for 10 min in a final volume of 150 µl of PBS supplemented with 1 mM IBMX containing approximately 2 x 105 cells and various concentrations of -MSH peptide. After incubation, cells were centrifuged and 200 µl of 0.33 M perchloric acid (PCA) was added to pellets to lyse the cells. After centrifugation, 200 µl of lysate was added to Dowex 50W-X4 resin (Bio-Rad) column (Bio-Rad, poly-prep columns), previously washed with 2 x 10 ml H2O. As an internal standard, 750 µl 0.33 M PCA containing 0.5 nCi/ml [14C]cAMP (Amersham) was added to column. Columns were washed with 2 ml H2O to remove ATP, which was collected in scintillation vials to estimate the amount of unconverted [3H]ATP. Four milliliters of Ready Safe scintillation cocktail (PerkinElmer) was added to the vials before counting. Dowex columns were then placed over aluminia (Sigma) columns (prewashed with 8 ml 0.1 M imidazole), and the cAMP was transferred onto the aluminia column using 10 ml H2O. cAMP was eluted from aluminia column using 4 ml 0.1 M imidazole and collected into scintillation vials to which 7 ml of scintillation fluid was added. 3H and 14C were counted on Tri-carb liquid scintillation beta counter. The amount of obtained [14C]cAMP was expressed as a fraction of total [14C]cAMP ([14C]cAMP/total [14C]cAMP) and was used to standardize [3H]cAMP to column efficiency. Results were calculated as the percent of total [3H]ATP (obtained as a sum of [3H]ATP from first column and [3H]cAMP from second column) to [3H]cAMP and used to determine EC50 values by nonlinear regression using the Prism version 3.0 software. All experiments were made in duplicates and repeated three times.
cAMP Assay in M3 Cells
Intracellular cAMP production induced by MC2R expressed in M3 cells was measured by sequential chromatography on Dowex and alumina columns as described for HEK 293 EBNA cells with following modifications (Gallo-Payet and Payet 1989). Seventy-two hours after transfection, MC2R transiently transfected M3 cells plated on 35-mm culture dishes were incubated 1 h at 37°C with complete culture medium containing 2 µCi/ml [3H]-adenine (NEN). The cells were then washed twice with Hank's buffer saline and equilibrated in the same buffer containing 1 mM isobutyl methylxanthine (IBMX) for 15 min at 37°C. ACTH was added to the incubation medium for further 15 min at 37°C. The reaction was ended by aspiration and adding 1 ml ice-cold 5% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid. Cells were harvested, and 100 µM ice-cold 5 mM ATP plus 5 mM cAMP solution was added to the mixture. Cellular membranes were pelleted at 5,000 g for 15 min at 4°C and the supernatants sequentially chromatographed on Dowex and alumina columns according to the method of Salomon, Londos, and Rodebell (1974), allowing the elution of [3H]-ATP and [3H]-cAMP, respectively. cAMP formation was calculated as percent conversion = [[3H]-cAMP/ ([3H]-cAMP + [3H]-ATP)] x 100 and expressed as fold stimulation over basal cAMP level.
RT-PCR and Southern Analysis
The total RNA was isolated from number of peripheral tissues (head-kidney, eye, skin, muscle, intestine, and gut) and several brain regions (telencephalon, optic tectum, hypothalamus, cerebellum, and brain stem). Tissues were dissected from frozen animal and kept in RNAlater (Ambion) before RNA extraction. Tissues were homogenized and total RNA was isolated using Rneasy Mini Kit (Qiagen), including processing with DNA shredder and DNase treatment (Qiagen) as recommended by manufacture's protocol. Because some of the samples retained genomic DNA, total RNA was exposed for another treatment with 1U/µl RNase-free DnaseI (Roche) for 10 min, followed by heat inactivation of DNase for 5 min at 70°C. Absence of genomic DNA in RNA preparations was confirmed in PCR reactions with primers specific to ß-actin gene using 10 to 100 ng of total RNA as a template and genomic DNA as a positive control. Messenger RNA was reverse transcribed using the First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Amersham). The produced cDNA was used as a template for PCR, with the specific primers for the receptor genes (see below). The quantity of cDNA was roughly estimated with PCR reactions on ß-actin gene by ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel inspection of PCR product taken after cycles 20, 25, 30, 35, and 40 of PCR reaction. The conditions for the PCR on receptor genes were 1 min initial denaturation, 20 s at 95°C, 30 s at appropriate annealing temperature, 60 s at 72°C for 30 or 40 cycles, and finished by 5 min at 72°C, using Taq polymerase (Invitrogen). The following primers were used: 5'-TCT CCT TCT GCA TCC TGT CG-3' and 5'-CAT CAA GGA GAA GCT GTG CT-3' for ß-actin gene (expected size 317 bp); 5'-TCA CGG GCC AAA GCA CCA GG-3' and 5'-TCA TCG TCT ACC ACA CTG AT-3' for MC1R gene (expected size 430 bp); 5'-TTA GCG CCA CCT CCA GTT TA-3' and 5'-ACG TGG TGG ACT CGC TGC-3' for MC2R gene (expected size for cDNA 626 bp); 5'-TCA CAT GCA CAC CAG CAT TT-3' and 5'-TGC TGG CGC GCC TGC ACA TG-3' for MC4R gene (expected size 332 bp); 5'-TCA GTA CTT ACC TGG AAG AG-3' and 5'-ACC TCC TTA ACA ACA AGC AGC-3' for MC5R gene (expected size of cDNA 709 bp). The PCR products were analyzed on 1% agarose gel. DNA from the gel was transferred onto nylon filters overnight, using 0.4 M NaOH. The filters were hybridized with a random-primed 32P-labeled, receptor-specific probe. Probes were generated by Megaprime kit (Amersham Biosciences) using sequence-verified PCR products amplified from plasmids containing Fugu MCR genes. Hybridization was carried out at 65°C in 25% formamide, 6 x SSC, 10% dextran sulfate, 5x Denhardt's solution, and 0.1% SDS overnight. The filters were washed three times in 0.2 x SSC, 0.1% SDS for 1 h at 65°C and exposed to autoradiography film (Amersham). As positive controls in the Southern blots, the PCR products obtained from genomic DNA was used. A number of MC2R and MC5R RT-PCR bands were cut out from agarose gel, purified, and sequenced to ensure their identity and correct splicing, because these RT-PCR products were of different size as compared with genomic DNA as a result of the presence of introns in these genes. The RT-PCR reactions with 30 and 40 cycles and respective Southern blots were performed at least two times each.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
|
|
Comparative Synteny Analysis
To gain more information about organization and synteny of the genome regions in Fugu containing MCR genes, we assembled from 170 kb to 400 kb large contigs using sequence data from different releases of Fugu genome consortium. First we found that MC2R and MC5R are located in close proximity in both Fugu (separated by 2.6 kb) and zebrafish (6.1 kb) (see fig. 4B). In both cases, the MC2R and MC5R genes face each other in sense of direction of transcription. This localization and orientation of the two genes appears to be very conserved among vertebrates. Thus, the human MC2R and MC5R orthologs located on chromosome 18 (18p11.2) are separated by 57.8 kb, whereas the mouse has 67.7 kb "inserted" between these genes. The MC2R and MC5R loci have also been mapped on the same region of chicken chromosome 2 (Schiöth et al. 2003).
|
![]() |
Pharmacological Properties of Fugu MCRs |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Radioligand Binding
We performed saturation analysis using high-affinity ligand [125I] NDP-MSH and competition-binding analysis using NDP-MSH,
-MSH, ß-MSH,
-MSH, ACTH(124), MTII, and HS024 as competitors. MTII and HS024 are synthetic ligands widely used for physiological studies. The results of binding experiments are shown in figure 5. Table 1 shows Kd and Ki values obtained from saturation and competition experiments, respectively, for the MSH-binding Fugu receptors. Table 1 also includes previously published results for the human MCRs for comparison, tested with the same methodological approach. It should be mentioned that these human MCR binding values have been tested repeatedly for over a decade with very consistent results. The results show that NDP-MSH binds to a single saturable site for all Fugu receptors, except for the MC2R that was tested separately in M3 cells (see below). The affinity for labeled NDP-MSH was high, indicating that this radioligand is appropriate for characterization of the Fugu MCRs, except the MC2R. The affinity of NDP-MSH was similar for both the labeled (saturation) and cold (competition) experiments and also similar between the Fugu and human orthologs. The endogenous ligands
-MSH, ß-MSH, and
-MSH had clearly lower affinity (64-fold, 7-fold, and 94-fold, respectively) for the Fugu MC1R than the human MC1R. The ACTH(124), which is generally considered to be equipotent to the full-length ACTH(139), had however only 4.7-fold higher affinity for the Fugu MC1R as compared with the human MC1R. The synthetic ligand MTII had about 10-fold lower affinity for the Fugu MC1R, whereas HS024 had similar affinity for the Fugu and human orthologs. In contrast to the Fugu MC1R, the Fugu MC4R had 23-fold, sevenfold, and 277-fold higher affinity for
-MSH, ß-MSH, and
-MSH, respectively, as compared with the human MC4R. MTII had higher affinity, whereas HS024 had lower affinity for the Fugu MC4R as compared with the human MC4R. In similar fashion as the MC4R, the Fugu MC5R had higher affinity for the natural peptides (
-MSH [68-fold], ß-MSH [8-fold], and
-MSH [12-fold]) than the human MC5R. MTII had also higher affinity for the Fugu MC5R, whereas HS024 had lower affinity than the human MC4R.
|
|
|
|
The results of the RT-PCR for each of the receptor gene are shown in figure 8. Each pair of PCR primers was designed to be specific for one receptor subtype. Specificity of the PCR reactions was estimated by Southern blot with the Fugu MCR subtype-specific probes. No cross-hybridization was detected in our samples (data not shown). To get an impression of the expression levels for Fugu MCRs, we analyzed the PCR products taken from cycles 30 and 40 of the PCR. Average results from at least three independent experiments are displayed in table 2. The MC1R showed only weak signals and could only be seen in three brain parts on the Southern blot, indicating very low levels of expression. Expression of MC2R (seen with EtBr staining) was found in telencephalon and hypothalamus, but could be detected with hybridization assay in head-kidney (corresponding to the adrenal gland) at the cycle 40. RT-PCR of MC4R was detected in high levels (seen on EtBr gel after cycle 30) in all brain parts except the brain stem and slightly lower levels in head-kidney and gut. A signal for the MC5R was found in brain, head-kidney, and eye.
|
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
We showed that there exist functionally spliced introns in two of the MCR genes in Fugu. This is intriguing, considering that none of the MCRs cloned so far, including the MCRs in zebrafish, have introns in their coding sequences. Moreover, our group has cloned additional MCR genes from the teleost linage, but we have not found any introns in these genes (unpublished results). In general, positions and the number of introns are very conserved between different species of vertebrates. Nevertheless, several reports exists about recent gain or differences in intron composition in vertebrates (Logsdon, Stoltzfus, and Doolittle 1998; Stoltzfus et al. 1997; O'Neill et al. 1998) and fish species in particular (Venkatesh, Ning, and Brenner 1999; Figueroa et al. 1995; Sandford et al. 1997). It is intriguing that the MC2R intron is located at the same position as one of the MC5R introns. Moreover, introns in this very same amino acid sequence (DRY) can be found in many GPCRs. This is one of the most important motifs that distinguishes the large rhodopsin group of GPCRs and is believed to be crucial in keeping the receptors in an inactivated form in absence of a ligand. The question arises as to whether this is an ancient intron that has been lost in all other members of MCR family but remained intact in two Fugu genes, as suggested by Logan et al. (2003), or whether these introns have been inserted into the genome later in the evolution of Fugu. We tend to believe that the introns found in MCR genes in Fugu are the result of recent insertions. Firstly, MC2R and MC5R are the most divergent members in the MCR family and may therefore have split from a common ancestor earlier than other MCR genes, where no traces of introns have been found. It seems unlikely that two genes could retain introns in Fugu, whereas many other MCR genes from related teleost and more ancestral species are intronless (unpublished results). Secondly, the genetic code of the DRY motif can form a protosplice site C/A, A, G, R, which is believed to be target site for insertion of spliceosomal introns by a process called reverse splicing (Dibb and Newman 1989; Dibb 1991, 1993). Although this theory is still debated, recent gene findings in "lower" animals and plants confirm the preferable insertion of spliceosomal introns into protosplice sites (Di Maro et al. 2002; Funke et al. 1999). We thus believe that many examples of intron position in DRY motif of GPCR can rather be explained by intron insertion that, in some cases, may have occurred late in the vertebrate evolution such as in the MCRs in Fugu, whereas others, such as the ones in galanine or neurokinin (NK) receptors, have occurred much earlier, giving rise to conserved introns in mammals and "lower" vertebrates (unpublished data). Moreover, the fact that rhodopsin GPCRs that have the DRY intron are not phylogenetically clustered, as far as we can determine, also indicates that the suggestion of common DRY intron in the GPCRs may be wrong. For example, the MC, NK, and galanine receptors all belong to different clusters of rhodopsin GPCRs or the , ß, and
subgroups of the rhodopsin family, respectively (Fredriksson et al. 2003). It is possible that intron insertion process in pufferfish is more frequent taking advantage of the protosplice site compared with other species, and it is possible that it has played some role in large genomic rearrangements, resulting in the compactness of Fugu genome.
It seems evident that not only the four MCRs are conserved in Fugu but also their ligands show a high degree of conservation. It is well established that there exist a high level of similarity between the -MSH peptide sequence in POMC among vertebrate species. As seen from figure 3, the MSH peptides contain amino acid sequence HFRW known to be the core sequence in ligand-receptor recognition. It has also been known that a number of teleost fishes lost the region in the POMC gene coding for
-MSH. This fact becomes particularly interesting in Fugu, which is missing MC3R, because MC3R in mammals has selectivity for
-MSH. The role and importance of MC3R in teleost fish species remains, however, obscure, considering that the zebrafish has a MC3R.
Fairly recently, it was established that MCRs have not only POMC products as ligands but also AGRP and ASIP. AGRP has previously been shown to exist in chicken, and our data show that there exists an Agrp peptide in fish as well. It is thus conceivable that the dual ligand system consisting of both MCR agonist and antagonist arose early in vertebrate evolution. The Cys rich part in the C-terminal of the Fugu AGRP seems to be very well conserved, whereas the other part is much less conserved. This is in agreement with data showing that this part of the peptide is important for the interaction with MCRs (Tota et al. 1999). We also found partial genes that may account for additional genes that are likely to represent additional members of the AGRP/ASIP group of peptides. The low similarity in the N-terminal region and inconsistency of several gene prediction programs made it impossible with certainty to predict the full length of these genes, but blasts and phylogeny experiments (data not shown) indicate that these are more similar to AGRP than the agouti peptides.
The availability of the complete repertoire of MCR clones from a nonmammalian vertebrate species made it in particular interesting to investigate the functionality of these receptors, and we performed a thorough characterization of the pharmacological properties. One of the important characteristics of the mammalian MC1R is that it has very high affinity to -MSH and similar or slightly lower affinity for ACTH. Surprisingly, we found that the Fugu MC1R had much lower affinity for
-MSH as compared with the human MC1R. In similar fashion, the Fugu had also lower affinity for the ß-MSH and
-MSH, whereas the potency order of these endogenous peptides was the same as for the mammalian MC1Rs. Remarkably, we also found that ACTH had more than 10-fold higher affinity than
-MSH to the Fugu MC1R. Our new data may suggest that the early vertebrate MCR had preference to ACTH peptides, whereas the sensitivity for the shorter POMC products such as
-MSH, ß-MSH, and
-MSH has appeared as the MCR subtypes gained more specified functions. This could also fit to the notion that the short MSH peptide sequences are copies of the original ACTH peptide sequence in the POMC gene. Previous studies have also indicated the mouse MC1R has much lower affinity for ACTH than
-MSH (Mountjoy 1994), suggesting that the mouse MC1R (that is perhaps evolving faster than the human one, considering that the mouse genome evolves about twice as fast as the human one) is losing its affinity for ACTH peptides. Taken together, this may support the hypothesis that the MC1R has evolved from being an ACTH-preferring receptor to being a specific
-MSH receptor in mammals.
One of the remarkable properties of the MCR family in mammalian species is that one of the MCRs does not bind MSH peptides at all. The MC2R is not able to bind MSH peptides, only recognizing ACTH peptides. It is not known how this unique property has evolved, and the MC2R in Fugu is the most "distant" receptor of this type that has been characterized. The pharmacological data show that the Fugu MC2R responds to ACTH, but it is not activated by -MSH, showing similar characteristics as the mammalian ACTH receptors. This clearly indicates that the specific ACTH selectivity and perhaps functionality in mediating steroidoneogenesis arose early in evolution of vertebrates and that this property is likely to be crucial for its function in most vertebrates.
The MC4R is one of the most pursued GPCR for drug development, yet it is surprising how low affinity it has for the natural MSH peptides. The Fugu MC4R shows about 10-fold higher affinity for the -MSH and ß-MSH as compared with the human MC4R, whereas, in similar fashion as the MC1R, the affinity is much higher for ACTH. The high potency of ACTH at the MC1R, MC2R, and MC4R in Fugu provides further support to the possibility that it was indeed the ACTH that was the "original" ligand for the early MCRs, which apparently was created very early during vertebrate evolution. One of the most distinct pharmacological characteristics of the MC4R in mammals is a particularly low affinity for
-MSH. The MC3R has preference to
-MSH and, together with the fact that these two MCRs are the most abundantly expressed in brain of the MCR repertoire in mammals, has made this property very valuable in physiological studies aiming to delineate the specific central effects of the MCRs. Remarkable,
-MSH has several hundredfold higher affinity for the Fugu MC4R than it has for the human MC4R. This is very interesting, as it is conceivable that the MC4R has evolved in such manner that it loses its binding ability to
-MSH. The role of
-MSH is still quite obscure, but these data clearly indicate the importance of
-MSH to not interfere with the MC4R and suggest that "this property" has become specifically important in "higher" vertebrates. It is also possible that this inability to bind
-MSH has been lost in the Fugu lineage, as it does not have the
-MSH sequence in POMC. The inability of the human MC4R to bind
-MSH has been linked to Tyr268 on the top of the TM6 (Oosterom et al. 2001). It is interesting to note that the Fugu MC4R is lacking the corresponding Tyr, as can be seen in figure 1. It is also interesting that we do not observe preference of the Fugu MC4R to ß-MSH in a similar way as we have previously shown for both the rat and human MC4R (Schiöth et al. 2002). There is increasing evidence that ß-MSH may have a specific role for the feeding response through MC4R in mammals (Harrold, Widdowson, and Williams 2003). The lack of specificity for the ß-MSH at the Fugu MC4R may suggest that this is a property that has evolved at later stages of vertebrate evolution. The MC5R in Fugu has in general higher affinity for the natural MSH peptides as compared with the human ortholog. This is particularly evident for
-MSH, which has about 70-fold higher affinity for the Fugu receptor, indicating that the mammalian MC5Rs may have lost their affinity to the
- MSH, ß-MSH, and
-MSH, but so little is known about the functional role of this receptor that it is difficult to speculate about the importance of this. We have also shown that all the MCRs can functionally couple to the Gs-linked signalling pathway in response to
-MSH and/or ACTH in line with previous results on the mammalian MCRs.
Although the RT-PCR is not well suited for quantitative analysis of gene expression, this approach is very effective in detecting expression of genes sets in a wide range of tissues. The expression of the MC2R in the brain is intriguing. The MC2R was found in four of the five brain regions analyzed (see fig. 8 and table 2), and sequencing of the RT-PCR products confirmed the predicted splicing of this gene in the brain. After the first cloning of the MC2R and the subsequent demonstration that this was indeed an ACTH receptor in mammals, several groups preformed an extensive search for this receptor in the brain (Xia and Wikberg 1996). This was because of the physiological textbook perception that ACTH played a role in a central negative feedback (Motta, Mangili, and Martini 1965). The MC2R has not been found in brain of any mammal, and the central ACTH-binding sites that were found early on can probably be attributed to the MC3R (Schiöth et al. 1997a). It is possible that the presence of the MC2R in the Fugu brain may suggest that there exists a negative feedback loop involving this receptor that may have been later taken over by, for example, the MC3R in mammals. Expression of mammalian MC4Rs has only been found in brain tissue. The fact that we have detected MC4R transcripts in telencephalon, optic tectum, hypothalamus, cerebellum, head-kidney. and gut of Fugu is in agreement with previously found observations from zebrafish (Ringholm et al. 2002), where MC4R was in addition to brain found to be expressed in the eye, GI tract, and ovaries. In chicken, the MC4R is expressed in a wide variety of peripheral tissues, including the heart, adrenal glands, ovaries, testes, spleen, adipose tissue, and eye, as well as the brain (Takeuchi and Takahashi, 1998). It is therefore possible that restriction of MC4R expression to the brain is a feature of mammalian species and has developed because of needs for more specific CNS-driven regulation of metabolic and behavioral processes. It has recently been demonstrated that MC4R participates in central regulation of food intake in teleost fish (Cerda-Reverter et al. 2003), but the presence of this receptor in peripheral tissues may suggest that it may also have additional functions in fishes. The MC5R is expressed in a wide range of tissues not only in mammals but also in chicken (Takeuchi and Takahashi 1998) and zebrafish. Our results show that also the MC5R in Fugu has both central and peripheral distribution, as we were able to detect the MC5R transcripts in brain, head-kidney, and eye, even though the expression pattern seems to be less widely spread than in many other species. It seems thus evident that the MC5R took on both central and peripheral functions early in vertebrate evolution.
Gene duplications occur by both individual and/or block duplications. The large-scale duplications, including polyploidizations, are believed to be important for shaping vertebrate genomes (Ohno 1970). Two rounds of large-scale duplications are proposed to have occurred in early vertebrate ancestry, resulting in up to four copies of each gene in mammals, which originate from a common ancestral gene in cephalochordates. This is now known as the "2R hypothesis" or the "one to four model" (Lundin 1993; Holland et al. 1994). When analyzing the neighboring regions of MCR genes, we found remarkable synteny in gene content and order between Fugu and corresponding human genome regions on chromosomes 16 and 18. Although the Fugu, like most teleost fishes, most probably underwent a lineage-specific genome duplication (the third round) approximately 250 MYA (Postlethwait et al. 1998), we were not able to detect duplicated genes in the three Fugu regions studied. Nevertheless, the finding of such extent of synteny is remarkable, taking into consideration more than 400 Myr since split of the lineages leading to teleosts and mammals. The highly conserved linkage of MC2R and MC5R genes is found in all representatives of different vertebrate classes (see figure 4) (Schiöth et al. 2003). The functional relevance of this tandem remains a mystery. This conserved linkage suggests that these receptors arose from a common ancestor by a local gene duplication event. It is intriguing that the MC2R and MC5R subtypes are evolutionary the most distant among the MCRs as seen from the phylogenetic analysis (fig. 2). This indicates that a local duplication responsible for this linkage occurred very early, most probably before the two putative tetraploidizations, which, according to the 2R hypothesis, took place before the origin of gnathostomes (Holland et al. 1994; Sidow 1996). The phylogenetic analysis clearly shows that MC4R and MC3R are more closely related to each other than to other MCRs. This suggest that if the MC2R and MC5R linkage have arisen from common ancestor through a local duplication, the MC3R might have arisen later from the common MC5R-related ancestor gene, perhaps through tetraploidization event. MC4R is, however, most likely the result of local duplication from MC5R that occurred after the last common tetraploidization in vertebrate lineage. Alternatively, MC1R and MC2R might have common ancestor gene and appeared through the genome duplication events. Although there is less similarity between these two receptors than in MC3/4/5R group, this scenario might be explained by different evolution rates, perhaps as MC2R has the most divergent pharmacological/physiological characteristics. An important question is when these duplications took place. According to our findings of MCR genes in lamprey (preliminary unpublished results), the appearance of MC1/2R and MC3/4/5R ancestor gene linkage can be dated before the appearance of gnathostomes (jawed vertebrates) but after the first tetraploidization. Taking into account the high similarity between MC3R, MC4R, and MC5R and presence of all these receptors in zebrafish, MC4R or MC3R might appeared through local duplication of MC5R soon after the last genome duplication after the split of gnathostomes. Figure 9 summarizes above-mentioned observations and provides a putative scheme for evolution of MCR genes through the duplication events. The order of appearance for MC3R and MC4R remains unclear. However, MC4R is located on the same chromosome in human, mouse, and chicken, thus indicating that MC4R might be a duplicate of a common ancestor to the MC5R branch. It is intriguing that the Fugu MC5R gene, which is linked with the MC2R gene, is, according to phylogenetic analysis, an ortholog of the zebrafish MC5aR gene. In zebrafish, however, it is the other one, or the MC5bR gene, that is linked with the MC2R gene. This would mean that different copies of MC2R gene have been lost in Fugu and zebrafish, providing further strong evidence for the ancient origin of the remarkable MC2R and MC5R gene linkage. It also indicates that two copies of MC2R gene existed in the teleost lineage before the split of Fugu and zebrafish. This is in agreement with our previous molecular clock investigation of the two zebrafish MC5Rs, dating them to the predicted teleost-specific genome duplication 250 MYA.
|
![]() |
Acknowledgements |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
![]() |
Footnotes |
---|
![]() |
Literature Cited |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Amemiya, Y., A. Takahashi, R. M. Dores, and H. Kawauchi. 1997. Sturgeon proopiomelanocortin has a remnant of gamma-melanotropin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 230:452-456.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Aparicio, S., J. Chapman, and E. Stupka, et al. (38 co-authors). 2002. Whole-genome shotgun assembly and analysis of the genome of Fugu rubripes. Science 297:1301-1310.
Carroll, R. L. 1988. Vertebrate paelontology and evolution. W.H. Freeman and Co., New York.
Cerda-Reverter, J. M., A. Ringholm, H. B. Schiöth, and R. E. Peter. 2003. Molecular cloning, pharmacological characterization, and brain mapping of the melanocortin 4 receptor in the goldfish: involvement in the control of food intake. Endocrinology 144:2336-2349.
Chen, A. S., D. J. Marsh, and M. E. Trumbauer, et al. (18 co-authors). 2000. Inactivation of the mouse melanocortin-3 receptor results in increased fat mass and reduced lean body mass. Nat. Genet. 26:97-102.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Chen, W., M. A. Kelly, X. Opitz-Araya, R. E. Thomas, M. J. Low, and R. D. Cone. 1997. Exocrine gland dysfunction in MC5-R-deficient mice: evidence for coordinated regulation of exocrine gland function by melanocortin peptides. Cell 91:789-798.[ISI][Medline]
Chhajlani, V. 1996. Distribution of cDNA for melanocortin receptor subtypes in human tissues. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int. 38:73-80.[ISI][Medline]
Crnogorac-Jurcevic, T., J. R. Brown, H. Lehrach, and L. C. Schalkwyk. 1997. Tetraodon fluviatilis, a new puffer fish model for genome studies. Genomics 41:177-184.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Danielson, P. B., J. Alrubaian, M. Muller, J. M. Redding, and R. M. Dores. 1999. Duplication of the POMC gene in the paddlefish (Polyodon spathula): analysis of gamma-MSH, ACTH, and beta-endorphin regions of ray-finned fish POMC. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 116:164-177.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Dibb, N. J. 1991. Proto-splice site model of intron origin. J. Theor. Biol. 151:405-416.[ISI][Medline]
Dibb, N. J. 1993. Why do genes have introns? FEBS Lett. 325:135-139.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Dibb, N. J., and A. J. Newman. 1989. Evidence that introns arose at proto-splice sites. EMBO J. 8:2015-2021.[Abstract]
Di Maro, A., E. Pizzo, M. V. Cubellis, and G. D'Alessio. 2002. An intron-less betagamma-crystallin-type gene from the sponge Geodia cydonium. Gene 299:79-82.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Dores, R. M., T. R. Smith, D. A. Rubin, P. Danielson, L. E. Marra, and J. H. Youson. 1997. Deciphering posttranslational processing events in the pituitary of a neopterygian fish: cloning of a gar proopiomelanocortin cDNA. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 107:401-413.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Farooqi, I. S., G. S. Yeo, J. M. Keogh, S. Aminian, S. A. Jebb, G. Butler, T. Cheetham, and S. O'Rahilly. 2000. Dominant and recessive inheritance of morbid obesity associated with melanocortin 4 receptor deficiency. J. Clin. Invest. 106:271-279.
Figueroa, F., H. Ono, H. Tichy, C. O'Huigin, and J. Klein. 1995. Evidence for insertion of a new intron into an MHC gene of perch-like fish. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 259:325-330.[ISI][Medline]
Fredriksson, R., M. C. Lagerström, L-G. Lundin, and H. B. Schiöth. 2003. The G-protein coupled receptors in the human genome form five main families: phylogenetic analysis, paralogon groups and fingerprints. Mol. Pharmacol. 63:1256-1272.
Funke, R. P., J. L. Kovar, J. M. Logsdon, Jr., J. C. Corrette-Bennett, D. R. Straus, and D.P. Weeks. 1999. Nucleus-encoded, plastid-targeted acetolactate synthase genes in two closely related chlorophytes, Chlamydomonas reihardtii and Volvox carteri: phylogenetic origins and recent insertion of introns. Mol. Gen. Genet. 262:12-21.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Gallo-Payet, N., and M. D. Payet. 1989. Excitation-secretion coupling: involvement of potassium channels in ACTH-stimulated rat adrenocortical cells. J Endocrinol. 120:409-421.[Abstract]
Gantz, I., and T. M. Fong. 2003. The melanocortin system. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 284:E468-E474.
Hall, T. A. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 41:95-98.
Harrold, J. A., P. S. Widdowson, and G. Williams. 2003. Beta-MSH: a functional ligand that regulated energy homeostasis via hypothalamic MC4-R? Peptides 24:397-405.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Holland, P. W., J. Garcia-Fernandez, N. A. Williams, and A. Sidow. 1994. Gene duplications and the origins of vertebrate development. Development (suppl.) 1994:125-133.
Huszar, D., C. A. Lynch, and V. Fairchild-Huntress, et al. (14 co-authors). 1997. Targeted disruption of the melanocortin-4 receptor results in obesity in mice. Cell 88:131-141.[ISI][Medline]
Kask, A., F. Mutulis, R. Muceniece, R. Pahkla, I. Mutule, J. E. Wikberg, L. Rago, and H. B. Schiöth. 1998. Discovery of a novel superpotent and selective melanocortin-4 receptor antagonist (HS024): evaluation in vitro and in vivo. Endocrinology 139:5006-5014.
Kitahara, N., T. Nishizawa, K. Iida, H. Okazaki, T. Andoh, and G. I. Soma. 1988. Absence of a gamma-melanocyte-stimulating hormone sequence in proopiomelanocortin mRNA of chum salmon Oncorhynchus keta. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B 91:365-370.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Kumar, S., K. Tamura, I. B. Jakobsen, and M. Nei. 2001. MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software. Distributed by the authors, Arizona State University, Tempe.
Lee, J., P. Danielson, C. Sollars, J. Alrubaian, P. Balm, and R. M. Dores. 1999. Cloning of a neoteleost (Oreochromis mossambicus) pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) cDNA reveals a deletion of the gamma-melanotropin region and most of the joining peptide region: implications for POMC processing. Peptides 20:1391-1399.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Logan, D. W., R. J. Bryson-Richardson, K. E. Pagan, M. S. Taylor, P. D. Currie, and I. J. Jackson. 2003. The structure and evolution of the melanocortin and MCH receptors in fish and mammals. Genomics 81:184-191.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Logsdon, J. M., Jr., A. Stoltzfus, and W. F. Doolittle. 1998. Molecular evolution: recent cases of spliceosomal intron gain? Curr. Biol. 8:R560-R563.[ISI][Medline]
Lu, D., D. Willard, and I. R. Patel, et al. (11 co-authors). 1994. Agouti protein is an antagonist of the melanocyte-stimulating-hormone receptor. Nature 371:799-802.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Lundell, I., H. Eriksson, U. Marklund, and D. Larhammar. 2001. Cloning and characterization of the guinea pig neuropeptide Y receptor Y5. Peptides 22:357-363.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Lundin, L. G. 1993. Evolution of the vertebrate genome as reflected in paralogous chromosomal regions in man and the house mouse. Genomics 16:1-19.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Miraglia Del Giudice, E., G. Cirillo, V. Nigro, N. Santoro, L. D'Urso, P. Raimondo, D. Cozzolino, D. Scafato, and L. Perrone. 2002. Low frequency of melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) mutations in a Mediterranean population with early-onset obesity. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 26:647-651.[CrossRef][Medline]
Motta, M., G. Mangili, and L. Martini. 1965. A "short" feedback loop in the control of ACTH secretion. Endocrinology 77:392-395.[ISI][Medline]
Mountjoy, K. G. 1994. The human melanocyte stimulating hormone receptor has evolved to become "super-sensitive" to melanocortin peptides. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 102:R7-R11.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Noon, L. A., J. M. Franklin, P. J. King, N. J. Goulding, L. Hunyady, and A. J. Clark. 2002. Failed export of the adrenocorticotrophin receptor from the endoplasmic reticulum in non-adrenal cells: evidence in support of a requirement for a specific adrenal accessory factor. J. Endocrinol. 174:17-25.
Ohno, S. 1970. Evolution by gene duplication. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Okuta, A., H. Ando, H. Ueda, and A. Urano. 1996. Two types of cDNAs encoding proopiomelanocortin of sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Zoolog. Sci. 13:421-427.[ISI][Medline]
O'Neill, R. J., F. E. Brennan, M. L. Delbridge, R. H. Crozier, and J. A. Graves. 1998. De novo insertion of an intron into the mammalian sex determining gene, SRY. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:1653-1657.
Oosterom, J., K. M. Garner, W. K. den Dekker, W. A. Nijenhuis, W. H. Gispen, J. P. Burbach, G. S. Barsh, and R. A. Adan. 2001. Common requirements for melanocortin-4 receptor selectivity of structurally unrelated melanocortin agonist and endogenous antagonist, Agouti protein. J. Biol. Chem. 276:931-936.
Penhoat, A., D. Naville, H. El Mourabit, A. Buronfosse, P. Durand, and M. Begeot. 2000. Functional expression of the human ACTH receptor gene. Endocr. Res. 26:549-557.[ISI][Medline]
Postlethwait, J. H., Y. L. Yan, and M. A. Gates, et al. (29 co-authors). 1998. Vertebrate genome evolution and the zebrafish gene map. Nat. Genet. 18:345-349.[ISI][Medline]
Rana, B. K., D. Hewett-Emmett, and L. Jin, et al. (12 co-authors). 1999. High polymorphism at the human melanocortin 1 receptor locus. Genetics 151:1547-1557.
Ringholm, A., R. Fredriksson, N. Poliakova, Y. L. Yan, J. H. Postlethwait, D. Larhammar, and H. B. Schiöth. 2002. One melanocortin 4 and two melanocortin 5 receptors from zebrafish show remarkable conservation in structure and pharmacology. J. Neurochem. 82:6-18.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Ringholm, A., J. Klovins, R. Fredriksson, N. Poliakova, E. T. Larson, J. P. Kukkonen, D. Larhammar, and H. B. Schiöth. 2003. Presence of melanocortin (MC4) receptor in spiny dogfish suggests an ancient vertebrate origin of central melanocortin system. Eur. J. Biochem. 270:213-221.
Salomon, Y., C. Londos, and M. Rodebell. 1974. A highly sensitive adenylate cyclase assay. Anal. Biochem. 58:541-548.[ISI][Medline]
Sandford, R., B. Sgotto, and S. Aparicio, et al. (12 co-authors). 1997. Comparative analysis of the polycystic kidney disease 1 (PKD1) gene reveals an integral membrane glycoprotein with multiple evolutionary conserved domains. Hum. Mol. Genet. 6:1483-1489.
Schimmer, B. P., W. K. Kwan, J. Tsao, and R. Qiu. 1995. Adrenocorticotropin-resistant mutants of the Y1 adrenal cell line fail to express the adrenocorticotropin receptor. J. Cell. Physiol. 163:164-171.[ISI][Medline]
Schiöth, H. B. 2001. The physiological role of melanocortin receptors. Vitam. Horm. 63:195-232.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Schiöth, H. B., A. A. Bouifrouri, R. Rudzish, R. Muceniece, H. Watanobe, J. E. Wikberg, and D. Larhammar. 2002. Pharmacological comparison of rat and human melanocortin 3 and 4 receptors in vitro. Regul. Pept. 106:7-12.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Schiöth, H. B., V. Chhajlani, R. Muceniece, V. Klusa, and J. E. Wikberg. 1996. Major pharmacological distinction of the ACTH receptor from other melanocortin receptors. Life Sci. 59:797-801.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Schiöth, H. B., R. Muceniece, M. Larsson, and J. E. Wikberg. 1997a. The melanocortin 1, 3, 4 or 5 receptors do not have a binding epitope for ACTH beyond the sequence of alpha-MSH. J. Endocrinol. 155:73-78.
Schiöth, H. B., R. Muceniece, F. Mutulis, P. Prusis, G. Lindeberg, S. D. Sharma, V. J. Hruby, and J. E. Wikberg. 1997b. Selectivity of cyclic [D-Nal7] and [D-Phe7] substituted MSH analogues for the melanocortin receptor subtypes. Peptides 18:(7): 1009-1013.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Schiöth, H. B., R. Muceniece, J. E. Wikberg, and V. Chhajlani. 1995. Characterisation of melanocortin receptor subtypes by radioligand binding analysis. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 288:311-317.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schiöth, H. B., S. Petersson, R. Muceniece, M. Szardenings, and J. E. Wikberg. 1997c. Deletions of the N-terminal regions of the human melanocortin receptors. FEBS Lett. 410:223-228.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Schiöth, H. B., T. Raudsepp, A. Ringholm, R. Fredriksson, S. Takeuchi, D. Larhammar, and B. P. Chowdhary. 2003. Remarkable synteny conservation of melanocortin receptors in chicken, human, and other vertebrates. Genomics 81:504-509.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Sidow, A. 1996. Gen(om)e duplications in the evolution of early vertebrates. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 6:715-722.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Stoltzfus, A., J. M. Logsdon, Jr., J. D. Palmer, and W. F. Doolittle. 1997. Intron "sliding" and the diversity of intron positions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:10739-10744.
Takahashi, A., Y. Amemiya, M. Nozaki, S. A. Sower, and H. Kawauchi. 2001. Evolutionary significance of proopiomelanoocortin in agnathan and chondrichthyes. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 129:283-289.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Takahashi, A., Y. Amemiya, M. Sarashi, S. A. Sower, and H. Kawauchi. 1995. Melanotropin and corticotropin are encoded on two distinct genes in the lamprey, the earliest evolved extant vertebrate. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 213:490-498.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Takeuchi, S., and S. Takahashi. 1998. Melanocortin receptor genes in the chicken-tissue distributions. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 112:220-231.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Takeuchi, S., K. Teshigawara, and S. Takahashi. 2000. Widespread expression of agouti-related protein (AGRP) in the chicken: a possible involvement of AGRP in regulating peripheral melanocortin systems in the chicken. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1496:261-269.[ISI][Medline]
Tan, C. P., K. K. McKee, D. H. Weinberg, T. MacNeil, O. C. Palyha, S. D. Feighner, D. L. Hreniuk, L. H. Van Der Ploeg, D. J. MacNeil, and A. D. Howard. 1999. Molecular analysis of a new splice variant of the human melanocortin-1 receptor. FEBS Lett. 451:137-141.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Thompson, J. D., D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680.[Abstract]
Tota, M. R., T. S. Smith, C. Mao, T. MacNeil, R. T. Mosley, L. H. Van der Ploeg, and T. M. Fong. 1999. Molecular interaction of agouti protein and agouti-related protein with human melanocortin receptors. Biochemistry 38:897-904.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Vaisse, C., K. Clement, B. Guy-Grand, and P. Froguel. 1998. A frameshift mutation in human MC4R is associated with a dominant form of obesity. Nat. Genet. 20:113-114.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Venkatesh, B., Y. Ning, and S. Brenner. 1999. Late changes in spliceosomal introns define clades in vertebrate evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:10267-10271.
Xia, Y., and J. E. Wikberg. 1996. Localization of ACTH receptor mRNA by in situ hybridization in mouse adrenal gland. Cell Tissue Res. 286:63-68.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]