Department of Biochemistry, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, CanadaL8N 3Z51
Author for correspondence: Radhey S. Gupta. Tel: +1 905 525 9140 ext. 22639. Fax: +1 905 522 9033. e-mail: gupta{at}mcmaster.ca
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Keywords: bacterial evolution, phylogeny, phylogenetic placement, Fibrobacter succinogenes, fibrolytic bacteria
Abbreviations: CFB, CytophagaFlavobacteriumBacteroides
The GenBank accession numbers for the sequences reported in this paper are AY017380, AY017381, AY017382 and AY017383.
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Based on its physiological characteristics, F. succinogenes, originally known as Bacteroides succinogenes, was previously considered to be a member of the CytophagaFlavobacteriumBacteroides (CFB) division (Hungate, 1950 ). However, subsequent studies based on 16S rRNA indicated that this and other related strains were not closely related to other species of Bacteroides, leading to their placement in a separate genus named Fibrobacter (Montgomery et al., 1988
). A recent taxonomic classification based on 16S rRNA places Fibrobacter in a separate division, distinct from the CFB group, originating from the common bacterial ancestor (Amann et al., 1992
; Maidak et al., 1999
; Ludwig & Schleifer, 1999
; Zinder, 1998
). Our current understanding of the evolutionary relationships among prokaryotes is based almost entirely on 16S rRNA sequences (Hugenholtz et al., 1998
; Maidak et al., 1999
; Olsen & Woese, 1993
; Woese, 1987
). Although, the phylogenetic trees based on 16S rRNA have proven extremely useful in the placement of species into different groups, one of their main recognized limitations has been their inability to resolve the relationships among the major divisions within bacteria or to deduce how these groups branched from a common ancestor (Maidak et al., 1999
; Ludwig & Schleifer, 1999
; Gupta, 1998a
, 2000c
). Recently, we have described a new approach based on the presence of shared conserved indels (or signature sequences) in different proteins for deducing the phylogenetic relationships among different bacterial groups, that complements this major deficiency of the rRNA trees (Gupta, 1998a
, 2000a
). By following the presence or absence of signature sequences in a number of different proteins in various divisions of bacteria, it is now possible to deduce logically how the major taxa within the Bacteria have branched from a common ancestor. The branching order for various divisions as determined from these studies is as follows: low-G+C Gram-positives
high-G+C Gram-positives
DeinococcusThermus
green non-sulphur bacteria
cyanobacteria
spirochaetes
ChlamydiaCFB group
,
-Proteobacteria
-Proteobacteria
ß-Proteobacteria
-Proteobacteria (Gupta, 1998a
, 2000a
, b
).
The identified signature sequences in various proteins are also useful for deterministic purposes and based upon the presence or absence of these signatures, it is now possible to place with a high degree of confidence any given bacterial species within one of the main groups that could thus far be distinguished (Gupta, 1998a , 2000a
, b
). In the present study, we have used the signature sequence approach to understand the phylogenetic placement of F. succinogenes within the domain Bacteria. For this purpose, we have amplified by PCR and sequenced segments of the Hsp60 (groEL), Hsp70 (dnaK), CTP synthase and alanyl-tRNA (Ala-tRNA) synthetase genes from F. succinogenes, which are known to contain useful signature sequences that are distinctive for different bacterial divisions (Gupta, 1998a
, 2000a
). The analyses of these signature sequences provide strong evidence that F. succinogenes shows a specific relationship to the Chlamydia and CFB groups of species. These signature sequences also provide evidence that this group of bacteria evolved after the branching of Gram-positive bacteria, DeinococcusThermus groups, green non-sulphur bacteria, cyanobacteria and spirochaetes, but prior to the branching of Proteobacteria (Gupta, 1998a
, 2000a
).
![]() |
METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Hsp70 gene.
The PCR amplification of the Hsp70 gene fragment was carried out in two segments. Initially, a fragment of 1080 bp was amplified using degenerate primers for two highly conserved regions in the Hsp70 protein (Galley et al., 1992 ). The forward primer was for the amino acid sequence GIDLGTT (nucleotide sequence 5'-GGNATHGAYYTNGGNACNAC-3') and the reverse primer for the sequence NPDEAVA (nucleotide sequence, 5'-GCNACNGCYTCRTCNGGRTT-3', where R represents A or G; Y represents C or T; H represents T, A, or C; and N represents A, G, C, or T). After this fragment was cloned and sequenced, the sequence was extended in the direction of the 3'-end by designing a specific forward primer near the 3'-end of the sequence (5'-AGGAACCGAACAAGACTG-3') and a degenerate primer in the reverse orientation for the conserved sequence QIEVTFD towards the C-terminal end of the protein (nucleotide sequence 5'-TCRAANGTNACYTCDATYTG-3') (Galley et al., 1992
). This led to the amplification of a 361 bp fragment whose sequence was combined with the original Hsp70 fragment to obtain a contiguous sequence of 1400 bp. The nucleotide and corresponding protein sequence were deposited in GenBank under the accession number AY017382.
Hsp60 gene.
The amplification of the Hsp60 gene fragment was carried out using a degenerate forward primer for the amino acid sequence GPKGRN (5'-GGNCCNAARGGNA(C)GNAAYGT-3') and a degenerate reverse primer for the sequence AVKAPGFGE (5'-TCNCCRAANCCNGGNGCYTTNACNGC-3') (Rusanganwa et al., 1992 ). These primers amplified a 756 bp fragment of the Hsp60 protein. Sequence data were deposited in GenBank under the accession number AY017380.
Alanyl-tRNA synthetase.
A 171 bp fragment of Ala-tRNA synthetase was amplified using a degenerate forward primer for the amino acid sequence FTNAGM (5'-TTYACNAAYGCNGGNATG-3') and a reverse primer for the sequence HTFFEM (5'-CATYTCRAARAANGTRTG-3'). Protein and nucleotide sequences were deposited in the GenBank database under the accession number AY017381.
CTP synthase.
A 401 bp fragment of CTP synthase was amplified using a degenerate forward primer for GICLGMQ (5'-GGNATHTGYYTNGGNATGCA-3') and a reverse primer for QFHPEF (5'-AAYTCNGGRTGRAAYTG-3'). Sequences for this gene and its corresponding protein were deposited in GenBank under the accession number AY017383.
PCR.
PCR reactions, of 10 µl volumes (approx. 0·2 µg DNA per reaction), were optimized for Mg2+ concentration (in the range of 1·54 mM) for each set of primers. PCR was carried out using a Techne Progene thermocycler, over 30 cycles (15 s at 94 °C, 15 s at 55 °C, 1 min at 72 °C) with an initial 1 min hot start at 94 °C, and a final extension step (15 s at 94 °C, 15 s at 55 °C, 7 min at 72 °C). The DNA fragments of the expected size were purified from 0·8% (w/v) agarose gels (using a GENECLEAN kit), and subcloned into the plasmid pCR TOPO 2.1 using a TA cloning kit (Invitrogen). After transformation of Escherichia coli JM109 cells with the plasmids, the inserts from a number of positive clones were sequenced. The fragments of less than 0·6 kb in length were sequenced by the dideoxy chain termination method using a T7 sequencing kit (Pharmacia). The larger fragments were sequenced by MOBIX. Sequences of all cloned fragments were run through a BLAST search to ensure the DNA was from a novel source.
Signature sequence analysis.
The nucleotide sequences for the four F. succinogenes genes were translated and added to multiple alignments of homologous proteins (sequences from various known bacteria acquired from BLAST searches, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Alignments were carried out with either ALIGN or CLUSTAL W software.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The use of the signature sequence approach for understanding the evolutionary relationship is based on the rationale that when a conserved indel of defined length and sequence, and flanked by conserved regions to ensure that the observed changes are not due to incorrect alignment or sequencing errors, is found at the same position in homologues from different species, then the simplest and most parsimonious explanation for this observation is that the indel was introduced only once during the course of evolution and then passed on to all descendants. A well-defined indel in a gene or protein thus provides a very useful milestone for evolutionary events, since all species emerging from the ancestral cell in which the indel was first introduced are expected to contain the indel, whereas all species that existed before this event or which did not evolve from this ancestor will lack the indel (Gupta, 1998a , c). To interpret whether a given indel in a particular protein is the result of an insertion or deletion event, and its possible implications regarding the relative branching order of different groups, a reference point is essential. Such a reference point is provided by the root of the prokaryotic tree. Several lines of evidence show that the root of the prokaryotic tree lies between the Archaea and Gram-positive bacteria (Iwabe et al., 1989
; Brown & Doolittle, 1995
; Gupta, 1998a
, b
, 2000b
), both of which are prokaryotic organisms bounded by a single membrane. Based on this rooting, the signature sequences in various proteins can be clearly interpreted and the branching order of different groups from the common ancestor can be logically deduced as described in earlier work (Gupta, 1998a
, 2000a
).
Deducing the phylogenetic placement of F. succinogenes
To employ the signature sequence approach for determining the phylogenetic placement of any given species, one begins by successively examining the signature sequences in different proteins that exclude the placement of the species in certain groups and at the same time show specific affinity of the species, or narrow down its placement, in certain other group(s) (Gupta, 1998a ). One prominent signature consists of an indel of 2123 aa, present in the N-terminal quadrant of Hsp70 protein, which distinguishes all true Gram-negative bacteria (defined by the presence of an inner and an outer membrane) from Gram-positive bacteria (Gupta, 1998a
, 2000a
). In earlier work, we have presented evidence that this indel represents an insert in the Gram-negative bacteria rather than a deletion in the Gram-positive bacteria (Gupta & Singh, 1992
; Gupta & Golding, 1993
; Gupta, 1998a
), indicating the ancestral nature of the Gram-positive group. Hsp70 is a highly conserved protein, which carries out an essential chaperone function in the cell (Lindquist & Craig, 1988
). Homologues of Hsp70 are present in all bacterial genomes sequenced to date, including those from the mycoplasmas, which contain a minimal gene complement (Fraser et al., 1995
). To examine the presence of this signature sequence in F. succinogenes, a 1·4 kb fragment of the Hsp70 gene was amplified by PCR. Sequencing of this fragment revealed that F. succinogenes Hsp70 contained the 21 aa insert (Fig. 1
), thus providing evidence that it belonged to the Gram-negative group of prokaryotes. The placement of F. succinogenes within the Gram-negative bacteria based on this signature is also in accordance with the observations that this species shows a negative Gram-staining reaction and possesses an outer membrane characteristic of Gram-negative bacteria (Holdeman et al., 1984
).
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In this context, the signature sequence approach developed in our recent work provides a new and powerful method for examining the evolutionary relationships among the species (Gupta, 1998a , 2000a
). In contrast to the phylogenetic trees, where the derived inference is based upon a large number of variables (e.g. reliability of the alignment, regions of sequences that are retained or excluded, number and range of species included, differences in evolutionary rates, base compositional differences, phylogenetic methods employed, etc.) which contributes to the uncertainties of the end results (Gupta, 1998a
), the evolutionary inference in this new approach is based entirely on the presence or absence of highly conserved sequence features. These sequence characteristics comprise indels of defined lengths present in highly conserved parts of the molecules, which makes interpretation of the data generally quite simple, unambiguous and based on minimal assumptions (Gupta, 1998a
). Based upon a large number of conserved indels in various proteins that have been introduced at various stages in evolution, it is now possible to clearly define most of the major groups within the Bacteria and to discern logically their branching order from the common ancestor (Gupta, 1998a
, 2000a
, b
). These signatures also permit the placement of any bacterial species into one of these groups based on the presence or absence of specific signatures in different proteins (Gupta et al., 1999
; Gupta, 2000a
).
In the present work, the signature sequence approach was used to determine the phylogenetic placement of Fibrobacter succinogenes within the domain Bacteria. Results presented here show that F. succinogenes is most closely related to the Chlamydia and CFB groups of species. A summary of the signature sequences that were used to derive this inference is presented in Fig. 6. The presence of the large 21 aa insert in F. succinogenes Hsp70, which is distinctive of all Gram-negative bacteria and not found in any Gram-positive bacteria, places Fibrobacter in the Gram-negative group. This indel has previously been shown to be due to an insertion in the common ancestor of Gram-negative bacteria, rather than a deletion in the Gram-positive group. This makes the Gram-positive bacteria an ancestral lineage and it provides a reference point for interpreting other signature sequences. The placement of Fibrobacter in the Gram-negative group is also supported by the signature in the Hsp60 protein, which additionally also excludes Fibrobacter from the DeinococcusThermus group and the green non-sulphur bacteria, which are two of the earliest branching divisions among Gram-negative bacteria (Gupta, 1998a
). A key signature for the phylogenetic placement of F. succinogenes is found in the protein Ala-tRNA synthetase. A 4 aa insert present in this protein is found only in Proteobacteria and in the Chlamydia and CFB groups of species (Gupta, 2000a
). Since this insert is also present in the F. succinogenes homologue, it provides strong evidence that F. succinogenes is related to one of these taxa. The presence of this insert also excludes F. succinogenes from the earlier branching spirochaetes and the cyanobacterial divisions. The distinction whether F. succinogenes belongs to the proteobacterial group or to the ChlamydiaCFB group is made on the basis of two signature sequences in CTP synthase and Hsp70 proteins that are distinctive of the proteobacterial species. The absence of these signatures in the F. succinogenes homologues provides evidence that this species does not belong to the proteobacterial group and places it in a similar position as the ChlamydiaCFB group.
|
Lastly, it should be emphasized that the use of signature sequences for the phylogenetic placement of species into different groups, or to understand the relative branching orders of these groups, is not contradictory to the phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA, but it complements such analyses in important respects. In our earlier work, where placement of a large number of bacterial species into different groups was carried out using the signature sequence approach, a nearly perfect correlation was observed with the assignment based on the 16S rRNA trees (Gupta, 1998a , 2000a
). However, the main advantage of the signature approach lies in the fact that it allows deduction of the branching orders of the main bacterial taxa, which thus far cannot be reliably determined based on the rRNA or other gene/protein phylogenies. The signature sequences in various proteins also permit a more precise molecular definition of different bacterial groups (or means to distinguish between them) than has hitherto been possible based on the phylogenetic trees. In these regards the signature sequence approach complements the major deficiencies of the rRNA trees in clarifying/understanding the genealogy of the Bacteria. It should however be mentioned that although the signature sequences are able to make clear distinction between different groups, they do not provide detailed information regarding the interrelationship of various species within a given group. Such information is contained in the phylogenetic trees. Hence, the use of signature sequences and the analysis based on phylogenetic trees provide complementary, and not contradictory, approaches for understanding the evolutionary relationships among prokaryotes.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Asanuma, N., Iwamoto, M. & Hino, T. (1999). Effect of the addition of fumarate on methane production by ruminal microorganisms in vitro. J Dairy Sci 82, 780-787.
Brown, J. R. & Doolittle, W. F. (1995). Root of the universal tree of life based on ancient aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase gene duplications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92, 2441-2445.[Abstract]
Cheng, K. J., Forsberg, C. W., Minato, H. & Costerton, J. W. (1991). Microbial ecology and physiology of feed degradation within the rumen. In Physiological Aspects of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants , pp. 595-624. Edited by T. Tsuda, Y. Sasaki & R. Kawahima. New York:Academic Press.
Debroas, D. & Blanchart, G. (1993). Interactions between proteolytic and cellulolytic rumen bacteria during hydrolysis of plant cell wall protein. Reprod Nutr Dev 33, 283-288.[Medline]
Doolittle, W. F. (1999). Phylogenetic classification and the universal tree. Science 284, 2124-2128.
Fields, M. W., Mallik, S. & Russell, J. B. (2000). Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 ferments ball-milled cellulose as fast as cellobiose until cellulose surface area is limiting. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 54, 570-574.[Medline]
Fraser, C. M., Gocayne, J. D., White, O. & 7 other authors (1995). The minimal gene complement of Mycoplasma genitalium. Science 270, 397403.[Abstract]
Galley, K. A., Singh, B. & Gupta, R. S. (1992). Cloning of HSP70 (dnaK) gene from Clostridium perfringens using a general polymerase chain reaction based approach. Biochim Biophys Acta 1130, 203-208.[Medline]
Garcia-Vallve, S., Romeu, A. & Palau, J. (2000). Horizontal gene transfer of glycosyl hydrolases of the rumen fungi. Mol Biol Evol 17, 352-361.
Gokarn, R. R., Eitnan, M. A., Martin, S. A. & Eriksson, K. E. (1997). Production of succinate from glucose, cellobiose, and various cellulosic materials by the ruminal anaerobic bacteria Fibrobacter succinogenes and Ruminococcus flavefaciens. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 68, 69-80.[Medline]
Gupta, R. S. (1995). Evolution of the chaperonin families (Hsp60, Hsp10 and Tcp-1) of proteins and the origin of eukaryotic cells. Mol Microbiol 15, 1-11.[Medline]
Gupta, R. S. (1998a). Protein phylogenies and signature sequences: a reappraisal of evolutionary relationships among Archaebacteria, Eubacteria, and Eukaryotes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62, 1435-1491.
Gupta, R. S. (1998b). What are archaebacteria: lifes third domain or monoderm prokaryotes related to Gram-positive bacteria? A new proposal for the classification of prokaryotic organisms. Mol Microbiol 29, 695-708.[Medline]
Gupta, R. S. (2000a). The phylogeny of Proteobacteria: relationships to other Eubacterial phyla and eukaryotes. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 24, 367-402.[Medline]
Gupta, R. S. (2000b). The natural relationships among prokaryotes. CRC Crit Rev Microbiol 26, 111-131.
Gupta, R. S. (2000c). Evolutionary relationships among bacteria: does 16S rRNA provide all the answers? ASM News 66, 189-190.
Gupta, R. S. & Golding, G. B. (1993). Evolution of HSP70 gene and its implications regarding relationships between archaebacteria, eubacteria, and eukaryotes. J Mol Evol 37, 573-582.[Medline]
Gupta, R. S. & Singh, B. (1992). Cloning of the HSP70 gene from Halobacterium marismortui: relatedness of archaebacterial HSP70 to its eubacterial homologs and a model for the evolution of the HSP70 gene. J Bacteriol 17, 4594-4605.
Gupta, R. S., Mukhtar, T. & Singh, B. (1999). Evolutionary relationships among photosynthetic prokaryotes (Heliobacterium chlorum, Chloroflexus aurantiacus, Cyanobacteria, Chlorobium tepidum and Proteobacteria): implications regarding the origin of photosynthesis. Mol Microbiol 32, 893-906.[Medline]
Holdeman, L. V., Kelley, R. W. & Moore, W. E. C. (1984). Family I. Bacteroidaceae Pribam 1933. In Bergeys Manual of Systematic Bacteriology , pp. 602-662. Edited by N. R. Krieg & J. G. Holt. Baltimore:Williams & Wilkins.
Huang, L. & Forsberg, C. W. (1990). Cellulose digestion and cellulase regulation and distribution in Fibrobacter succinogenes subsp. succinogenes S85. Appl Environ Microbiol 56, 1221-1228.[Medline]
Hugenholtz, P., Pitulle, C., Hershberger, K. L. & Pace, N. (1998). Novel division level bacterial diversity in a Yellowstone hot spring. J Bacteriol 180, 366-376.
Hungate, R. E. (1950). The anaerobic mesophilic cellulolytic bacteria. Bacteriol Rev 14, 1-49.
Iwabe, N., Kuma, K., Hasegawa, M., Osawa, S. & Miyata, T. (1989). Evolutionary relationship of archaebacteria, eubacteria, and eukaryotes inferred from phylogenetic trees of duplicated genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86, 9355-9359.[Abstract]
Lindquist, S. & Craig, E. A. (1988). The heat-shock proteins. Annu Rev Genet 22, 631-677.[Medline]
Ludwig, W. & Schleifer, K. H. (1999). Phylogeny of Bacteria beyond the 16S rRNA Standard. ASM News 65, 752-757.
Maidak, B. L., Cole, J. R., Parker, C. T., Jr and 11 other authors (1999). A new version of the RDP (Ribosomal Database Project). Nucleic Acids Res 27, 171173.
Montgomery, L., Flesher, B. & Stahl, D. (1988). Transfer of Bacteroides succinogenes (Hungate) to Fibrobacter gen. nov. as Fibrobacter succinogenes comb. nov. and description of Fibrobacter intestinalis sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 38, 430-435.
Olsen, G. J. & Woese, C. R. (1993). Ribosomal RNA: a key to phylogeny. FASEB J 7, 113-123.
Paster, B. J., Dewhirst, F. E., Olsen, I. & Fraser, G. J. (1994). Phylogeny of Bacteroides, Prevotella, and Porphyromonas spp. and related bacteria. J Bacteriol 176, 725-732.[Abstract]
Reichenbach, H. (1992). The Order Cytophagales. In The Prokaryotes , pp. 3631-3675. Edited by A. Balows, H. G. Trüper, M. Dworkin, W. Harder & K. H. Schleifer. New York:Springer.
Rusanganwa, E., Singh, B. & Gupta, R. S. (1992). Cloning of HSP60 (GroEL) operon from Clostridium perfringens using a polymerase chain reaction based approach. Biochim Biophys Acta 1130, 90-94.[Medline]
Shah, R. N. (1992). The genus Bacteroides and related taxa. In The Prokaryotes , pp. 3593-3607. Edited by A. Balows, H. G. Trüper, M. Dworkin, W. Harder & K. H. Schleifer. New York:Springer.
Shi, Y., Odt, C. L. & Weimer, P. J. (1997). Competition for cellulose among three predominant ruminal cellulolytic bacteria under substrate-excess and substrate-limited conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 63, 734-742.[Abstract]
Wang, Y., McAllister, T. A., Yanke, L. J. & Cheeke, P. R. (2000). Effect of steroidal saponin from Yucca schidigera extract on ruminal microbes. J Appl Microbiol 88, 887-896.[Medline]
Weimer, P. J., Waghorn, G. C., Odt, C. L. & Mertens, D. R. (1999). Effect of diet on populations of three species of ruminal cellulolytic bacteria in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 82, 122-134.
Weisburg, W. G., Oyaizu, Y., Oyaizu, H. & Woese, C. R. (1985). Natural relationship between Bacteroides and Flavobacteria. J Bacteriol 164, 230-236.[Medline]
Woese, C. R. (1987). Bacterial evolution. Microbiol Rev 51, 221-271.
Woese, C. R. (1998). The universal ancestor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95, 6854-6859.
Zinder, S. H. (1998). Bacterial diversity. In Topley and Wilsons Microbiology and Microbial Infections , pp. 125-147. Edited by A. Balows & B. I. Duerden. London:Arnold.
Received 15 February 2001;
revised 17 May 2001;
accepted 25 May 2001.