Cross-complementation between the products of the genes P1 and ORF6 of Mycoplasma pneumoniae subtypes 1 and 2

Ina Catrein1, Roger Dumke2, January Weiner, III1,{dagger}, Enno Jacobs2 and Richard Herrmann1

1 Zentrum für Molekulare Biologie, Universität Heidelberg (ZMBH), Im Neuenheimer Feld 282, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
2 Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Hygiene, Technische Universität, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstrasse 74, D-01307 Dresden, Germany

Correspondence
Richard Herrmann
r.herrmann{at}mail.zmbh.uni-heidelberg.de


   ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
The genes P1 (MPN141) and ORF6 (MPN142) are essential for the successful colonization of the human respiratory tract by Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Both genes are located in the P1 operon, which consists of three genes. The P1 gene is the second gene in the operon, followed by the ORF6 gene. The P1 gene contains two (RepMP2/3, RepMP4) and the ORF6 gene one (RepMP5) specific repetitive DNA sequence, of which seven to nine similar but not identical copies are dispersed on the genome. Despite this large potential pool for genetic variation, M. pneumoniae isolates from patients contain only one of two distinct combinations of the genes P1 and ORF6. To analyse the functions of the repetitive DNA sequences, two ‘new’ combinations of the genes P1 and ORF6 were constructed, keeping the P1 gene constant but exchanging RepMP5 copies of the ORF6 gene. M. pneumoniae was transformed with these constructs and the transformants were tested for their ability to grow and survive under in vitro conditions and in guinea pigs. The two transformants colonized the respiratory tract of guinea pigs and showed no obvious differences in their growth behaviour compared to M. pneumoniae isolates from patients. The results indicate that the subtype-specific combinations of the repetitive elements in the P1 and ORF6 genes are not essential for the successful adherence of M. pneumoniae to host cells and the colonization of the respiratory tract of guinea pigs.


{dagger}Present address: Arbeitsgruppe Bioinformatik, Institut für Botanik, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Schlossplatz 4, D-48155 Münster, Germany.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Mycoplasma pneumoniae is a small wall-less bacterium with a genome size of about 816 kbp (Himmelreich et al., 1996) and a proposed coding capacity for 688 ORFs (Dandekar et al., 2000). This bacterium is host dependent in nature, but it can be grown in the laboratory without a host cell in a rich medium supplemented with serum (Hayflick, 1965). M. pneumoniae is the causative agent of a primary atypical pneumonia in humans (Jacobs, 1991; Principi & Esposito, 2001; Rosengarten et al., 2000; Taylor-Robinson, 1996). Epidemic outbreaks were registered in time-intervals of 3–7 years followed by endemic phases in the epidemiology of M. pneumoniae infections (Jacobs et al., 1996; Lind et al., 1997). The circulation of different subtypes in the human population and therefore the time-dependent subtype-specific immune response of the hosts were discussed as possible reasons for the unique epidemiological course of respiratory diseases due to M. pneumoniae (Jacobs et al., 1996). Genetic differences of M. pneumoniae patient isolates were first described by Su et al. (1990). They used the gene P1 (MPN141), which encodes the main adhesin P1 (Inamine et al., 1988; Su et al., 1987) as a discriminating probe. Based on sequence differences of the P1 gene and restriction fragment length polymorphism of genomic DNA, the species M. pneumoniae was divided into two subtypes. The prototype of subtype 1 became the strain M. pneumoniae M129 (ATCC 29342), of which the genome has been completely sequenced (Himmelreich et al., 1996), and the strain M. pneumoniae FH (ATCC 15531) represents subtype 2. Several subtyping analyses with patient isolates collected in different countries during the past 30 years confirmed the original observations that, based on the gene P1, all isolates can be classified as either subtype 1 or 2, although minor sequence differences in the P1 gene could be found in a few isolates (Dorigo-Zetsma et al., 2001; Dumke et al., 2003; Kenri et al., 1999). Only recently, attempts were made to find additional genetic markers for subtyping purposes (Dumke et al., 2003). The results of this study indicated a remarkable genetic stability among the 115 M. pneumoniae isolates from patients collected in different countries over a period of 30 years. So far, in addition to the P1 gene, only the genes encoding the proteins P65 (MPN309) (Proft et al., 1995), P40 and P90 have turned out to be useful for subtyping. P40 and P90 are the products of the ORF6 gene. Both are surface exposed and probably arise by post-translational cleavage, since the nucleotide sequence of the ORF6 gene predicts an 130 kDa protein (Franzoso et al., 1993; Sperker et al., 1991). P40 and P90 are probably identical with the proteins B and C missing in certain avirulent, cytadherence-negative mutants of M. pneumoniae (Hansen et al., 1979; Hu et al., 1984; Krause & Balish, 2004). Cross-linking experiments indicated that P40 and P90 form a protein complex together with the P1 adhesin (Layh-Schmitt & Herrmann, 1994; Layh-Schmitt et al., 2000). It is specifically inserted into the region of the membrane that forms the terminal attachment organelle, an asymmetric extension of the bacterium, also denoted the tip structure. The proper formation of the attachment organelle is essential for adherence of M. pneumoniae to its host cell. Mutations in the ORF6 gene result in an avirulent, cytadherence-negative phenotype and a random distribution of the P1 protein over the whole surface of M. pneumoniae instead of the concentration of P1 at the tip structure as seen in wild-type strains (Baseman et al., 1982).

The ORF6 gene is part of the P1 operon (Fig. 1), which consists, in the following order, of the genes ORF4 (MPN140), P1 (=ORF5 (MPN141)) and ORF6 (MPN142). Repetitive DNA sequences are located within both the P1 gene and the ORF6 gene. P1 contains RepMP2/3 and RepMP4 while ORF6 contains RepMP5 (Colman et al., 1990; Ruland et al., 1990, 1994). Each of these repetitive sequences appears eight to ten times as similar copies dispersed on the genome of M. pneumoniae M129 (Himmelreich et al., 1996; Ruland et al., 1990). They vary in size and are about 1·5–1·8 kbp (RepMP2/3), 1·1–1·5 kbp (RepMP4) and 1·5–2 kbp (RepMP5) long. Most of the repetitive sequences consist of variable middle sections, which are bordered by two constant regions. Comparative sequence and PCR analyses of the P1 operon from 115 M. pneumoniae patient isolates had shown that there is a constant fixed subtype-specific combination of copies of RepMP2/3, RepMP4 and RepMP5. Although not proven, a switch from a M. pneumoniae M129-specific P1 or ORF6 gene to a M. pneumoniae FH-specific one could be explained by exchange of the subtype-specific RepMP copy by recombination between the constant regions (Ruland et al., 1994). So far, M. pneumoniae patient isolates carrying the combination of a M. pneumoniae M129-specific P1 gene and a M. pneumoniae FH-specific ORF6 gene or vice versa have not been found (Dumke et al., 2003), although a subtype switch would require such intermediates.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Scheme of the P1 operon and of ORF6 genes. (a) Organization of the P1 operon of M. pneumoniae M129. The P1 operon of M. pneumoniae FH is organized in the same order. (b) The three different ORF6 genes used in this study are enlarged. The vertical dotted lines in the ORF6 genes show the positions of the unique restriction sites for the endonucleases BlpI and BstEII. The black arrow points to the site where the proteolytic cleavage into P40 and P90 takes place. Genome position and origin of the copy give the nucleotide positions of the ORF6 gene and of RepMP5 copies on the genome of M. pneumoniae M129. Differences in the DNA sequences are indicated by different shades of grey. For details see Fig. 5.

 
These results seem to indicate that the ‘correct’ combination of the P1 adhesin and ORF6 gene products is important for the adherence of M. pneumoniae to the host cells and the survival of the bacterium in its host environment, and that other combinations might be disadvantageous for the infection or the colonization process. To test this hypothesis, we constructed ‘new’ combinations of P1 and ORF6 genes and investigated the ability of M. pneumoniae transformants carrying these combinations to grow and survive in guinea pigs, which were introduced as suitable animal models for studying in vivo the consequences of a M. pneumoniae infection (Jacobs, 1991).

For our studies we used the cytadherence-negative mutant M. pneumoniae B170 (ATCC 29343), a derivative of M. pneumoniae M129 (Lipman et al., 1969). It possesses M129-specific P1 and ORF6 genes but has lost the ability to synthesize P40 and P90 (Sperker et al., 1991) due to the deletion of one nucleotide (G) at position 1040 of the ORF6 gene (genome position 186787, P. C. Hu, personal communication). We complemented this mutant by introducing into its genome, via transposon, different ORF6 genes and compared the growth characteristics, expression of selected proteins, adherence properties and survival in an immunocompetent host of the resulting transformants with those of M. pneumoniae M129 and M. pneumoniae B170.


   METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Bacteria.
M. pneumoniae reference strains M129 [ATCC 29342; subtype 1; broth passage no. 31] and FH [ATCC 15531; subtype 2 (Su et al., 1990); broth passage no. 5] were cultivated as described previously (Regula et al., 2000) and stored at –80 °C. M. pneumoniae B170 cells were grown non-adherently in 500 ml glass flasks. Frozen stocks of M. pneumoniae were diluted 1 : 10 with Hayflick medium and incubated at 37 °C with gentle agitation for 96 h. The cells were harvested by centrifugation for 15 min at 8000 g at 4 °C.

Isolation of genomic DNA, restriction analysis and Southern blot.
These were done as described previously (Dumke et al., 2003).

DIG labelling of probes and hybridization.
The genomic DNAs from single clones were characterized by Southern blotting, using DIG-labelled probes. These were generated by incorporating Digoxigenin-11-dUTP (Roche) with Taq DNA polymerase (Promega) during polymerase chain reactions according to the manufacturer's recommendation. Two probes were synthesized, deriving either from IS256 or from the gentamicin-resistance gene of the transposon Tn4001mod (Hahn et al., 1996). The primer set 1 (Table 1) was used for amplification of a part of the IS element and the primer set 2 for amplification of a subfragment of the gentamicin-resistance gene.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Primers

 
PCR and sequencing.
The DNAs for the detection of M. pneumoniae-specific gene sequences by PCR were routinely extracted with the QIAquick DNA mini kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Most of the PCRs were done in a Mastercycler gradient (Eppendorf) in a final volume of 50 µl containing 5 µl 10x DNA polymerase buffer, 100 mM each of dATP, dGTP, dTTP and dCTP, 30 pmol of each primer, 1 µl DNA polymerase [either Taq DNA polymerase 2000 or 5000 U ml–1 (New England Biolabs), or DeepVent DNA polymerase 2000 U ml–1 (New England Biolabs)] and 0·05 µg genomic or cosmid DNA as template. For amplification of any template DNA, 35 cycles were run under the following conditions: (i) heating of the reaction mixture for 2 min at 95 °C; (ii) denaturation step during cycles for 30 s at 95 °C; (iii) primer hybridization for 30 s at 48–60 °C depending on the melting temperature of the primer; (iv) DNA synthesis for 45 s to 8 min at 72 °C depending on the length of PCR product; (v) final extension for 10 min at 72 °C. The PCR products were analysed in 1·5 % agarose gels and purified with the High Pure Product purification kit (Roche).

The mutation in the ORF6 gene of M. pneumoniae B170 at gene position 1040 was confirmed by sequencing the relevant part of PCR products generated with primer set 3 or primer set 4. Primer set 11 was used for sequencing only.

The ORF6 gene from M. pneumoniae M129 was amplified with primer set 5 (primer o.7179 contains an additional ClaI restriction site). This PCR product was ligated to the expression unit of MPN531. The expression unit was amplified with primer set 6 (primer o.6531 contains an additional PstI restriction site). The PCR was done as described above except that pcosMPG12 (Wenzel & Herrmann, 1989) was used as template. The ligation product of the expression unit and ORF6 gene was amplified by PCR, using primers o.6531 and o.7179, and subcloned into the ClaI and PstI restriction sites of the vector pBC (Stratagene).

The ORF6 gene from M. pneumoniae FH was amplified with primer set 7.

The recombinant ORF6 gene was assembled by ligating three different PCR products, PCR1, PCR2 and PCR3. They were synthesized with primer set 8 (PCR1, primer o.7199 contains a BlpI restriction site), set 9 (PCR3, primer o.7204 contains a BstEII restriction site) and set 10 (PCR2) using the cosmids (Wenzel & Herrmann, 1989) pcosMPE07 (PCR1, PCR3) and pcosMPCO9 (PCR2) as templates. PCR2 and PCR3 were then ligated and the product used to amplify a PCR2/3 intermediate, which was ligated to PCR1. This new intermediate served as template for synthesizing, with primers o.7199 and o.7204, sufficient amounts of the final product. This DNA fragment, consisting in the 5'–3' direction of PCR1, PCR2 and PCR3, contained a BlpI restriction site near the 5' end and a BstEII site near the 3' end.

To prove the presence of Tn4001 in reisolates of M. pneumoniae from bronchial alveolar lavage fluids a specific part of this transposon was amplified with primer set 2. The stable mutation in the ORF6 gene of the reisolated mutants at genome position 186787 was confirmed by amplifying the relevant part of the gene with primer set 3 and sequencing with primer set 11.

Sequencing was done using the BigDye terminator cycle sequencing kit and the DNA sequencer ABI PRISM 377 or 373A (Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems) or by using external sequencing facilities (GATC Biotech).

Cloning of ORF6 genes
(i) ORF6 of M. pneumoniae M129.
The purified PCR products of the expression unit of MPN531 and of the ORF6 gene were ligated with T4 ligase (New England Biolabs) and inserted into the unique SmaI site of the vector pBC (Stratagene), yielding the plasmid pIC1. The ORF6 gene together with the expression unit of MPN531 was transferred from pIC1 into the transposon Tn4001mod, which is part of the plasmid pKV74 (Hahn et al., 1996). For this cloning step, the ORF6 gene was excised from pIC1 with the restriction enzymes PstI and ClaI (New England Biolabs) and, after the sticky ends had been converted to blunt ends with the Klenow enzyme (AGS), ligated into the BamHI site of the vector pKV74. The sticky BamHI ends were also converted to blunt ends by the Klenow enzyme. The new plasmid was named pICT1.

(ii) ORF6 of M. pneumoniae FH.
Plasmid pICT1 was digested with nucleases BstEII and BlpI, yielding a 10·8 kbp and a 1·8 kbp fragment. The 10·8 kbp fragment was isolated from a 0·8 % agarose gel and ligated with a BstEII/BlpI DNA fragment carrying the FH-specific RepMP5 copy. This fragment was amplified with primer set 7 from the FH-specific ORF6 gene using genomic DNA of M. pneumoniae FH as substrate. The new plasmid was named pICT2.

(iii) Recombinant ORF6.
The PCR product containing RepMP5 833 was synthesized as described. It was directly cloned into the unique SmaI site of the vector pBC. The resulting plasmid was called pIC3. The new recombinant ORF6 was excised from pIC3 with BlpI and BstEII and ligated into the plasmid pICT2, also treated with BlpI and BstEII, such that it replaced the FH-specific ORF6 gene, generating the new plasmid pICT3.

Transformation of M. pneumoniae.
M. pneumoniae cells were transformed with the corresponding plasmids by electroporation as described previously (Hedreyda et al., 1993) and transformants were selected on PPLO agar plates containing gentamicin (80 µg ml–1). Colonies were picked from PPLO agar plates and grown in 1 ml modified Hayflick medium also containing gentamicin (80 µg ml–1). These cultures were then used for inoculation of new expanded cultures or stored at –70 °C.

Filtration technique for Mycoplasma.
To get single colonies from M. pneumoniae suspensions, the standard technique as described by Tully (1983) was used with the following modifications. The cells were passed sequentially through a 400 nm, a 220 nm and a 100 nm filter, plated on PPLO agar plates and incubated at 37 °C. Single colonies were picked after 10–14 days from plates and cultivated in liquid broth culture.

Haemadsorption test.
The haemadsorption test was done as published (Krause et al., 1982) with the modification that concentrates of human erythrocytes were diluted in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (Gibco) until the OD600 was 0·8. Pictures were taken with an Olympus DP50 digital camera connected to a Zeiss Axiophot with the 20x objective.

Polyclonal antibodies and preparation of antisera.
The specific antisera against the P40 proteins of subtypes 1 and 2 were obtained by immunizing rabbits with the following peptides, which have been coupled to keyhole limpet haemocyanin (mcKLH, Pierce): pep 2528F CDESSWKNSEKTTAEND (amino acid residues 275–290; specific for M. pneumoniae M129); pep 2527M CSDSSGSQGQGTTDNKFQKY (amino acid residues 330–346; specific for M. pneumoniae FH – see Fig. 5). For coupling the peptides to mcKLH, a cysteine residue was added at the amino-terminus of each peptide. The peptides were synthesized by M. Ellis and T. Ruppert (ZMBH). The antisera were delivered from Peptide Speciality Laboratories. The antisera against P1 (Dumke et al., 2003), P65 (Proft & Herrmann, 1994), P90 and P40 (Sperker et al., 1991) have been described.



View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Amino acid sequence comparison of the variable regions of the ORF6 gene products used in this study. The sequences were aligned using the computer program LASERGENE (DNASTAR). The P90 protein of M. pneumoniae M129 starts with arginine (R) at position 455 (see also the supplementary data files with the online version of this paper). The peptides used for generating specific antibodies against the P40 proteins of subtype 1 (M129, residues 275–290) and subtype 2 (FH, residues 330–346) are marked by +++ or small circles.

 
SDS-PAGE and Western blotting.
The determination of the protein concentration, the SDS-PAGE and the Western blotting were carried out as published (Dumke et al., 2003).

Animal experiments.
Three male guinea pigs (450–600 g, Dunkin-Hartley, Charles River) per group were intranasally infected with an identical inoculum of a specific M. pneumoniae strain on the same day (Dumke et al., 2004). The inoculum varied between groups from approximately 4x106 to 6x108 c.f.u. suspended in 300 µl PBS. The infected animals were kept separately in air-conditioned boxes with filter systems (Biozone) until they were sacrificed. The experiments with the different transformant groups were organized in such a way that the groups were infected one after the other to avoid any cross-contamination. Ten days after infection, the animals were killed by heart puncture under anaesthesia (Jacobs, 1991). The trachea was prepared and a small catheter device was introduced into the trachea drainage hole. For bronchoalveolar washing we instilled approximately 10 ml PPLO broth. The regained solution (approx. 3 ml) was used to isolate M. pneumoniae from the lower respiratory tract of the animals.

Two hundred microlitres of the infection suspensions and of the bronchial alveolar lavage fluids were spread on PPLO agar and incubated for at least 3 weeks at 37 °C. In the case of negative results the remaining bronchial alveolar lavage fluid (stored at –20 °C) was concentrated by centrifugation (8000 g, 10 min), and the sediments were resuspended in 500 µl PPLO broth and incubated in the same way. In parallel, 100 µl concentrated bronchoalveolar washing fluid was added to 900 µl PPLO broth and incubated at 37 °C until the colour of the medium changed from red to orange, or for at least 3 weeks. For molecular characterization selected colonies were picked and incubated in 1·5 ml PPLO broth at 37 °C.


   RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Complementation of M. pneumoniae B170 with the ORF6 gene of M. pneumoniae M129
First of all, we resequenced the ORF6 gene of our M. pneumoniae B170 clone and confirmed that it still had the frame-shift mutation in the ORF6 gene. Western blotting analyses with P40- and P90-specific polyclonal antibodies (Sperker et al., 1991) supported the DNA sequencing results, showing that neither P40 (Fig. 2a, lane 6) nor P90 (data not shown) was synthesized in the cytadherence-negative mutant M. pneumoniae B170.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Western blots of total protein extracts from cloned transformants of M. pneumoniae B170. After 10 % SDS-PAGE and transfer to nitrocellulose membranes the blots were incubated with antisera specific to the proteins P1 and P40 from either M. pneumoniae M129 or FH. In each panel, lanes 1–3 contain samples of cloned transformants and lanes 4–6 contain positive and negative control samples derived from M. pneumoniae M129 (lane 4); M. pneumoniae FH (lane 5) and M. pneumoniae B170 (lane 6). (a) Lane 1, M.p. B170/M5; lane 2, M.p. B170/M19; lane 3, M.p. B170/M31. (b) Lane 1, M.p. B170/F3; lane 2, M.p. B170/F8; lane 3, M.p. B170/F12. (c) Lane 1, M.p. B170/R1; lane 2, M.p. B170/R2; lane 3, M.p. B170/R3. M. pneumoniae B170/F8 (b, lane 2) is a revertant which again synthesized the M.p. M129-specific P40.

 
To prove that the cytadherence-negative phenotype is caused only by the frame-shift mutation in the ORF6 gene we complemented M. pneumoniae B170 with the intact ORF6 gene from M. pneumoniae M129. The gene was integrated into the mutant genome via the modified transposon Tn4001, which is part of the plasmid pKV74 (Hahn et al., 1996). This vector contains the unique restriction sites for the endonucleases EcoRI and BamHI. The ORF6 gene of M. pneumoniae M129 was amplified by PCR and fused to the expression unit of MPN531 (clpB) also amplified by PCR. The expression unit was defined as the DNA segment beginning at the first nucleotide in front of the start codon of MPN531 and ending 313 nucleotides further upstream (genome position 653950–654263). The transcriptional start point of this gene (Weiner et al., 2000) and its relative transcription rate (Weiner et al., 2003) were determined experimentally. We selected this expression unit, because clpB is well transcribed and translated (Ueberle et al., 2002) and can be up- and down-regulated by changes in temperature (Weiner et al., 2003). This promoter fusion was necessary, because the ORF6 gene, as part of an operon, does not have its own promoter (Fig. 1). The amplified and modified ORF6 gene was ligated first into the BamHI site of the plasmid pBC, generating the plasmid pIC1, and from there transferred into the transposon Tn4001 (see Methods). This new plasmid was named pICT1. After confirming the correct nucleotide sequence of the modified ORF6 gene, M. pneumoniae B170 was transformed with pICT1 by electroporation. Transformants, now called M. pneumoniae B170/M, which could grow in the presence of gentamicin (80 µg ml–1) either in liquid medium or on agar plates, were filter cloned by standard methods and tested (i) for the presence of Tn4001 sequences, (ii) for adsorption to plastic surfaces and erythrocytes and (iii) for synthesis of the products of the intact ORF6 gene, P40 and P90. The results for transformants M. pneumoniae B170/M5, M. pneumoniae B170/M19 and M. pneumoniae B170/M31 are shown as examples (Figs 2a, 3a and 4c).



View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Southern blots of genomic DNAs from cloned transformants of M. pneumoniae B170. The genomic DNAs were digested with restriction enzyme BglII (a, d) or DraIII (b, c), separated on 0·8 % agarose gels and transferred to a nylon membrane. Hybridizations were done with DIG-labelled PCR-fragment specific either for the IS element or for the gentamicin-resistance gene. The concentration was 8 ng per ml of hybridization solution. (a) Lane 1, pICT1; lane 2, M.p. B170; lanes 3–5: M.p. B170/M5, M.p. B170/M19, M.p. B170/M31. (b) Lane 1, pICT2; lane 2, M.p. B170; lanes 3–5, M.p. B170/F1, M.p. B170/F5, M.p. B170/F3. (c) Lane 2, M.p. B170; lanes 3–5, M.p. B170/fr1, M.p. B170/fr2, M.p. B170/fr4. (d) Lane 1, pICT3; lane 2, M.p. B170; lanes 3–5, M.p. B170/R1, M.p. B170/R2, M.p. B170/R3.

 


View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Erythrocyte-binding assay. Colonies were incubated with human erythrocytes: (a) M. pneumoniae M129; (b) M. pneumoniae B170; (c) M. pneumoniae B170/M31; (d) M. pneumoniae B170/F3; (e) M. pneumoniae B170/fr4; (f) M. pneumoniae B170/R1. M. pneumoniae B170/fr1 and fr2 bind to erythrocytes like M. pneumoniae B170/fr4 (data not shown).

 
Southern blotting analysis confirmed the presence of Tn4001 in all transformants by identification of the IS element and of the gentamicin-resistance gene. We used the endonuclease BglII for restriction of the genomic DNA. Since it did not cut the plasmid pICT1, the gentamicin- and IS-specific probes recognized the same DNA fragments (Fig. 3a). The sizes of the reacting DNA fragments of individual transformants were different, indicating that the sites of insertion of the transposon into the genomes of these transformants were not identical. The site of insertion was determined precisely for M. pneumoniae B170/M31. This was done by digesting the complete genomic DNA with restriction endonuclease HindIII, cloning the DNA fragment which contained the transition between the end of the transposon and the genomic DNA into the vector pBC and sequencing the relevant DNA region. The transposon was inserted within MPN285 between nucleotides 340652 and 340653. This gene encodes a prrB homologue. It is a member of a family of restriction enzymes and obviously nonessential, since M. pneumoniae B170/M31 shows normal growth. Western blotting analyses with polyclonal antisera against P40 (Fig. 2a, lanes 1–3) and P90 (data not shown) proved the synthesis of the corresponding proteins. These two proteins must have been translated from the newly inserted ORF6 gene since the frame-shift mutation in the original ORF6 gene was still present. The sequence analysis of a PCR fragment amplified with two primers (set 3) binding at a unique position (o.1935) near the end of the P1 gene of M. pneumoniae B170 and downstream of the position of the frame-shift mutation in the ORF6 gene (o.672) confirmed the frame-shift mutation in the original ORF6 gene. Antisera against P1 (Fig. 2a) and P65 (data not shown) proved that both proteins were also expressed in all three transformants. The regained ability of M. pneumoniae B170/M31 to adhere to surfaces (glass, plastic) and erythrocytes (Fig. 4c) was in agreement with the Western blot results.

Selection of RepMP5 copies for constructing ‘new’ ORF6 genes
After proving that trans-complementation with the ORF6 gene products is in principle possible, we constructed two ‘new’ P1–ORF6 combinations composed of the M. pneumoniae M129-specific P1 gene complemented with either the M. pneumoniae FH-specific ORF6 gene (Ruland et al., 1994), or a RepMP5-specific copy occurring outside the P1 operon of M. pneumoniae. These combinations have, so far, not been detected in M. pneumoniae isolates (Dumke et al., 2003).

To simulate possible recombination events between the ORF6 gene and the repetitive elements, a set of scripts was created in the Perl programming language to simulate in silico all possible recombination events between the ORF6 gene and the repetitive elements. Two DNA fragments – one from ORF6, the other from a repetitive element – were assumed to be possible recombination sites if (i) the recombination site was longer than 20 bp (Cohan, 1994), (ii) there was a perfect match of at least 10 bp at either end of one recombination site, (iii) there was a similarity of at least 90 % between the two fragments and (iv) the longest mismatch stretch was not longer than 3 bp. Next, all found recombination sites were permutated and the sequences were recombined at these sites, so that 5' and 3' regions came from the original ORF6 gene, and the central region from a repetitive sequence. Recombined sequences which contained a frame-shift or a stop mutation, or were more than 70 amino acids shorter than the original P1 protein, were rejected. Finally, a multiple alignment of all 601 resulting recombined sequences was done using the program CLUSTAL W. A recombined sequence contained in a cluster distant as far as possible from both M129- and FH-specific ORF6 gene sequences was chosen for further analysis. The central region of this sequence was derived from the repetitive element RepMP5 833, located on the genome between nucleotides 131796 and 133581 (Figs 1 and 5; for more details see the supplementary files with the online version of this paper).

Construction of ‘new’ ORF6 genes
The ‘new’ ORF6 genes were constructed by replacing a 1824 bp inner DNA fragment of the ORF6 gene of M. pneumoniae M129 located between the two unique restriction sites for the endonucleases BlpI (genome position nucleotide 185989) and BstEII (genome position nucleotide 187815). These two restriction sites are located outside of the variable RepMP5 repeat region within the conserved part of the ORF6 gene M129, the ORF6 gene FH and the RepMP5 833 copy (Fig. 1). The DNA manipulations were done with either plasmid pIC1 or pICT1 (see above), both carrying the ORF6 gene M129, by exchanging their BlpI/BstEII fragment (1824 bp) and inserting either the BlpI/BstEII fragment (1623 bp) from the ORF6 gene FH or the BlpI/BstEII fragment (1680 bp) from Rep MP5 833 (=ORF6 gene R, for details see Methods). The plasmids carrying the ORF6 gene FH were called pIC2 and pICT2, and the plasmids carrying the ORF6 gene R were called pIC3 and pICT3 (Table 2). The correctness of these gene constructions was confirmed by sequencing each of the newly constructed ORF6 genes. An amino acid sequence comparison of the variable regions of the three ORF6 gene products used in this study is shown in Fig. 5.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Plasmids

 
After transforming M. pneumoniae B170 with pICT2 or pICT3 several transformants were isolated and tested for the same criteria as M. pneumoniae B170/M. M. pneumoniae B170 transformed with the ORF6 gene FH were named M. pneumoniae B170/F and those transformed with ORF6 gene R were named M. pneumoniae B170/R. Both M. pneumoniae B170/F and M. pneumoniae B170/R behaved like M. pneumoniae B170/M. They adhered to plastic and erythrocytes (Fig. 4d, f) and synthesized P40 as shown by Western blotting with subtype-specific antisera against P40 (Fig. 2b, c). The sera were directed against the peptide pepF2528 (=P40 FH-specific) or peptide pepM2527 (=P40 M129-specific). Since the ORF6 gene R also encodes the M129-specific peptide but not the FH-specific one, it reacts only with the M129-specific anti-P40 serum. Subtype-specific sera for P90 or for ORF6 gene R derived P40 and P90 were not available, but an antiserum against the non-variable region of P90 (Sperker et al., 1991) recognized P90 of M. pneumoniae B170/M, B170F and B170R (data not shown). All transformants but one (Fig. 2b, lane 2), which gave positive results with anti-P40 antisera, had still the original frame-shift mutation in the ORF6 gene, as was shown by PCR amplification and sequence analyses of the relevant regions (data not shown). The single exception was M. pneumoniae B170/F8, protein extracts of which reacted positively (Fig. 2b, lane 2) with both the M. pneumoniae M129- and the M. pneumoniae FH-specific anti-P40 serum. Sequence analysis proved that this strain was a revertant carrying two intact ORF6 genes. In support of the data from Western blotting, we confirmed the transformation of M. pneumoniae B170 by identifying parts of the transposon Tn4001 in Southern blotting experiments as already described for M. pneumoniae B170/M (Fig. 3). Although the two tested ORF6 genes restored the ability of M. pneumoniae B170 to adhere to erythrocytes, we determined the site of insertion of the corresponding transposon, to ensure that no known cytadherence-relevant gene had been inactivated. The insertion sites of the transposons in the genomes of the transformants used in the erythrocyte-binding assay (Fig. 4) were for M. pneumoniae B170/F3 in gene MPN506 (putative lipoprotein, unknown function) after nucleotide position 616708 and for M. pneumoniae B170/R1 within gene MPN077 (hypothetical ORF) after nucleotide position 113895. The results proved that a specific combination between a P1 and an ORF6 gene as seen in the prototype of subtypes 1 and 2 was not mandatory for the ability to adhere to erythrocytes.

Intranasal infection of guinea pigs with selected M. pneumoniae strains
To determine whether the transformed bacteria were able to colonize the host respiratory tract, we infected guinea pigs with selected transformants and screened for surviving bacteria in the bronchial alveolar lavage fluids.

In five sets of separate experiments three guinea pigs each were infected with a specific M. pneumoniae strain. The infection doses varied between 3·9x106 and 6·3x108 c.f.u. The following strains were tested for their ability to survive in the respiratory tract of the infected animals: (i) M. pneumoniae M129 (positive control for host colonization), expressing the characteristic subtype 1-specific P1 and ORF6 proteins (P40/P90); (ii) M. pneumoniae B170 (negative control for host colonization), unable to synthesize P40 and P90; (iii) three transformants of M. pneumoniae B170 containing the described ORF6 genes (Table 3), namely M. pneumoniae B170/M31 (clone 31, subtype 1-specific ORF6 gene), M. pneumoniae B170/F3 (clone 3, subtype 2-specific ORF6 gene) and M. pneumoniae B170/R1 (clone 1, RepMP5 833-derived ORF6 gene). Ten days after infection the bronchial alveolar lavage fluids were tested for viable M. pneumoniae strains surviving in the host environment, on agar plates and, in the case of negative results, enriched in liquid medium (Table 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. M. pneumoniae strains and mutants

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Recovery of M. pneumoniae in bronchial washing fluids after intranasal infection of guinea pigs with mutants B170, B170/M31, B170/F3, B170/R1 and the control strain M129

 
As expected, the subtype 1 strain M. pneumoniae M129 was re-isolated on agar plates from the bronchial washing fluids of all infected guinea pigs and the mutant M. pneumoniae B170 was negative on direct agar cultivation, but also after enrichment and subcultivation, indicating that this strain was not able to colonize any of the three animals. Further colony growth on agar plates was detected in the bronchial fluids from guinea pigs which were infected with the transformant M. pneumoniae B170/F3. Growth of M. pneumoniae could be detected after incubating the bronchial alveolar fluids in liquid medium in two bronchial fluids of two guinea pigs infected with M. pneumoniae B170/M31 and in samples of three guinea pigs infected with M. pneumoniae B170/R1. These latter five positive cultures in PPLO broth were subcultured on PPLO agar. Twenty randomly picked M. pneumoniae colonies (except animal 2 from the guinea pigs infected with M. pneumoniae B170/F3, from which only five colonies were recovered), derived either from the primary agar plates or from subcultures of enriched PPLO broth cultures, were characterized by PCR, DNA sequencing, Southern blotting and their ability to adhere to erythrocytes. Compared with the initial inoculum we found no differences. All re-isolates had the one nucleotide deletion at position 1040 of the original ORF6 gene, still contained the inserted transposon with the specific new ORF6 sequences at the same genome position as determined by Southern blotting analysis and retained the ability to adhere to human erythrocytes. As examples, we show the results of the analyses of three isolates (M. pneumoniae B170/fr1, fr2 and fr4), which were recovered from M. pneumoniae B170/F3-infected guinea pigs (Figs 3c and 4e).


   DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
The cytadherence-negative mutant M. pneumoniae B170 was converted to a cytadherence-positive strain by complementation with each of three different ORF6 genes. These results confirmed that besides the P1 protein an expressed ORF6 gene is essential for cytadherence and persisting survival of M. pneumoniae in a host environment and that M. pneumoniae strains with the same P1 protein but different expressed ORF6 genes show a colonization-positive phenotype in guinea pigs.

The number of recovered colonies after plating without prior enrichment in liquid medium is rather low (Table 4), but this is a general phenomenon of the fastidiously growing M. pneumoniae cells. For this reason it is recommended microbiological practice in diagnostics not only to spread infected samples directly on agar plates but also to enrich the bacteria in liquid medium. A positive result, the identification of an infectious M. pneumoniae is achieved if, with either procedure, bacteria were re-isolated. Applying these procedures we recovered the ORF6-complemented M. pneumoniae strains from almost all infected guinea pigs and confirmed by molecular methods that they were identical with the inoculum strains. In agreement with published data (Lipman et al., 1969), the only strain that could not be recovered was the non-adhering M. pneumoniae B170. It was eliminated by the natural clearance of the bronchial tract within 10 days.

Due to the problems concerning the recovery of M. pneumoniae directly from samples of the bronchial washing fluids, plating efficiencies cannot be used to quantify differences in the ability of individual strains to adhere and to colonize the host. The re-isolation of M. pneumoniae from bronchial fluids on agar plates or in liquid medium is therefore only a qualitative parameter for colonization. Since colonization is only one step in the interaction of M. pneumoniae with its host, further studies are needed to explore whether these transformants are still pathogenic and elicit comparable cellular and humoral host responses as the infectious subtype 1 and 2 strains (Jacobs, 1991; Jacobs et al., 1988). We conclude from the result of the described experiments that M. pneumoniae strains carrying different gene P1/ORF6 combinations are able to colonize and to persist in a host organism and therefore could also act as true intermediates in a switch from subtype 1 to subtype 2 and vice versa.

In contrast to these findings are the results from analyses of the composition of the P1 operons from 115 M. pneumoniae strains collected from patients in different countries over a period of 30 years. They showed that only two subtype 1- and 2-specific combinations of the genes P1 and ORF6 could be identified (Dumke et al., 2003). How can we explain the discrepancy between the results from the patient isolates and the in vitro generation of transformants with hitherto unknown combinations of P1 protein and ORF6 gene products? What is the function of the seven additional copies of RepMP5, which supply a potential reservoir – at least in theory – for generating many different ORF6 genes (Himmelreich et al., 1996; Rocha & Blanchard, 2002)?

If we exclude the possibility that the isolation procedure for M. pneumoniae strains from patients is selective, then we should find more ‘new’ combinations of the P1 and ORF6 genes in the P1 operon carrying different repetitive DNA sequences, as we indeed observed in the described experiments (Dumke et al., 2003). These ‘new’ combinations could be generated by homologous recombination leading, among others, to the same P1/ORF6 combination as in the transformants M. pneumoniae M129/F and M129/R. We explain the failure to detect such M. pneumoniae strains by the lack of an efficient system for homologous recombination.

We assume that the crucial enzyme for this reaction is RecA. M. pneumoniae contains the corresponding gene (MPN490), but in a transcriptome analysis of M. pneumoniae M129 (Weiner et al., 2003) only low signals were obtained for a RecA-specific mRNA. In addition, RecA has not been identified in a proteome analysis combining 2D gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry (Ueberle et al., 2002) although the features of RecA, pI 9·77 and no predicted transmembrane segment, should have allowed the identification, unless the amount is too low for detection by standard 2D gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. However, recently RecA was identified in a total protein extract of M. pneumoniae FH by a proteome analysis, which was done without separation of the total protein extract into individual proteins prior to tryptic cleavage (Jaffe et al., 2004). This method is more sensitive, since it avoids the considerable losses of proteins occurring during 2D gel electrophoresis and allows the application of higher amounts of protein extracts. Therefore, the concentration of RecA in M. pneumoniae could be rather low. In agreement with these observations are the negative results from experiments aiming to construct mutants from M. pneumoniae by homologous recombination, which is in contrast to the results with the closely related species Mycoplasma genitalium (Dhandayuthapani et al., 1999). The latter organism was successfully transformed by integration of foreign DNA via homologous recombination and its RecA was also identified on 2D gels of total M. genitalium cell extracts (Wasinger et al., 2000).

Similar experiments as those carried out with the ORF6 gene should also be done with the P1 gene, although this will be more complicated, because this gene contains two repetitive DNA sequences, RepMP2/3 and RepMP4 (Fig. 1; Ruland et al., 1990). In a first step, one of these sequences of a subtype 1-specific P1 gene could be exchanged with a subtype 2-specific one and the resulting M. pneumoniae strain tested for adherence, ability to infect hosts and its potential to serve as a true precursor for a complete subtype switch. Experiments along this line will help to explain whether the observed switch of the dominating subtype in epidemic outbreaks of M. pneumoniae appearing in intervals of 3–7 years is caused by conversion of one subtype to another one or by faster growth of one subtype in a mixture of both subtypes. Since the human immune defence would be primarily directed against the dominating infecting subtypes, the second subtype could grow uninhibited, at least for some time, and should become the dominating infectious subtype in the following years.


   ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We thank E. Pirkl for excellent technical assistance, C.-U. Zimmerman for critically reading the manuscript and I. Schmid for secretarial work. This project was supported by grants He 399-2 and Ja 399-2 from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.


   REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Baseman, J. B., Cole, R. M., Krause, D. C. & Leith, D. K. (1982). Molecular basis for cytadsorption of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. J Bacteriol 151, 1514–1522.[Medline]

Cohan, F. (1994). Genetic exchange and evolutionary divergence in prokaryotes. Trends Ecol Evol 9, 175–180.

Colman, S. D., Hu, P. C. & Bott, K. F. (1990). Prevalence of novel repeat sequences in and around the P1 operon in the genome of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Gene 87, 91–96.[CrossRef][Medline]

Dandekar, T., Huynen, M., Regula, J. T. & 10 other authors (2000). Re-annotating the Mycoplasma pneumoniae genome sequence: adding value, function and reading frames. Nucleic Acids Res 28, 3278–3288.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dhandayuthapani, S., Rasmussen, W. G. & Baseman, J. B. (1999). Disruption of gene mg218 of Mycoplasma genitalium through homologous recombination leads to an adherence-deficient phenotype. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96, 5227–5232.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dorigo-Zetsma, J. W., Wilbrink, B., Dankert, J. & Zaat, S. A. (2001). Mycoplasma pneumoniae P1 type 1- and type 2-specific sequences within the P1 cytadhesin gene of individual strains. Infect Immun 69, 5612–5618.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dumke, R., Catrein, I., Pirkl, E., Herrmann, R. & Jacobs, E. (2003). Subtyping of Mycoplasma pneumoniae isolates based on extended genome sequencing and on expression profiles. Int J Med Microbiol 292, 513–525.[Medline]

Dumke, R., Catrein, I., Herrmann, R. & Jacobs, E. (2004). Preference, adaptation and survival of Mycoplasma pneumoniae subtypes in an animal model. Int J Med Microbiol 294, 149–155.[CrossRef][Medline]

Franzoso, G., Hu, P. C., Meloni, G. A. & Barile, M. F. (1993). The immunodominant 90-kilodalton protein is localized on the terminal tip structure of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Infect Immun 61, 1523–1530.[Abstract]

Hahn, T. W., Krebes, K. A. & Krause, D. C. (1996). Expression in Mycoplasma pneumoniae of the recombinant gene encoding the cytadherence-associated protein HMW1 and identification of HMW4 as a product. Mol Microbiol 19, 1085–1093.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hansen, E. J., Wilson, R. M. & Baseman, J. B. (1979). Two-dimensional gel electrophoretic comparison of proteins from virulent and avirulent strains of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Infect Immun 24, 468–475.[Medline]

Hayflick, L. (1965). Tissue cultures and mycoplasmas. Tex Rep Biol Med 23, Suppl 1, 285–303.[Medline]

Hedreyda, C. T., Lee, K. K. & Krause, D. C. (1993). Transformation of Mycoplasma pneumoniae with Tn4001 by electroporation. Plasmid 30, 170–175.[CrossRef][Medline]

Himmelreich, R., Hilbert, H., Plagens, H., Pirkl, E., Li, B. C. & Herrmann, R. (1996). Complete sequence analysis of the genome of the bacterium Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Nucleic Acids Res 24, 4420–4449.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hu, P. C., Collier, A. M. & Clyde, W. A., Jr (1984). Serological comparison of virulent and avirulent Mycoplasma pneumoniae by monoclonal antibodies. Isr J Med Sci 20, 870–873.[Medline]

Inamine, J. M., Loechel, S. & Hu, P. C. (1988). Analysis of the nucleotide sequence of the P1 operon of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Gene 73, 175–183.[CrossRef][Medline]

Jacobs, E. (1991). Mycoplasma pneumoniae virulence factors and the immune response. Rev Med Microbiol 2, 83–90.

Jacobs, E., Stuhlert, A., Drews, M., Pumpe, K., Schaefer, H. E., Kist, M. & Bredt, W. (1988). Host reactions to Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections in guinea-pigs preimmunized systemically with the adhesin of this pathogen. Microb Pathog 5, 259–265.[CrossRef][Medline]

Jacobs, E., Vonski, M., Oberle, K., Opitz, O. & Pietsch, K. (1996). Are outbreaks and sporadic respiratory infections by Mycoplasma pneumoniae due to two distinct subtypes? Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 15, 38–44.[Medline]

Jaffe, J. D., Berg, H. C. & Church, G. M. (2004). Proteogenomic mapping as a complementary method to perform genome annotation. Proteomics 4, 59–77.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kenri, T., Taniguchi, R., Sasaki, Y., Okazaki, N., Narita, M., Izumikawa, K., Umetsu, M. & Sasaki, T. (1999). Identification of a new variable sequence in the P1 cytadhesin gene of Mycoplasma pneumoniae: evidence for the generation of antigenic variation by DNA recombination between repetitive sequences. Infect Immun 67, 4557–4562.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Krause, D. C. & Balish, M. F. (2004). Cellular engineering in a minimal microbe: structure and assembly of the terminal organelle of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Mol Microbiol 51, 917–924.[Medline]

Krause, D. C., Leith, D. K., Wilson, R. M. & Baseman, J. B. (1982). Identification of Mycoplasma pneumoniae proteins associated with hemadsorption and virulence. Infect Immun 35, 809–817.[Medline]

Layh-Schmitt, G. & Herrmann, R. (1994). Spatial arrangement of gene products of the P1 operon in the membrane of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Infect Immun 62, 974–979.[Abstract]

Layh-Schmitt, G., Podtelejnikov, A. & Mann, M. (2000). Proteins complexed to the P1 adhesin of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Microbiology 146, 741–747.[Medline]

Lind, K., Benzon, M. W., Jensen, J. S. & Clyde, W. A., Jr (1997). A seroepidemiological study of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections in Denmark over the 50-year period 1946-1995. Eur J Epidemiol 13, 581–586.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lipman, R. P., Clyde, W. A., Jr & Denny, F. W. (1969). Characteristics of virulent, attenuated, and avirulent Mycoplasma pneumoniae strains. J Bacteriol 100, 1037–1043.[Medline]

Principi, N. & Esposito, S. (2001). Emerging role of Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae in paediatric respiratory-tract infections. Lancet Infect Dis 1, 334–344.[CrossRef][Medline]

Proft, T. & Herrmann, R. (1994). Identification and characterization of hitherto unknown Mycoplasma pneumoniae proteins. Mol Microbiol 13, 337–348.[Medline]

Proft, T., Hilbert, H., Layh Schmitt, G. & Herrmann, R. (1995). The proline-rich P65 protein of Mycoplasma pneumoniae is a component of the Triton X-100-insoluble fraction and exhibits size polymorphism in the strains M129 and FH. J Bacteriol 177, 3370–3378.[Abstract]

Regula, J. T., Ueberle, B., Boguth, G., Görg, A., Schnölzer, M., Herrmann, R. & Frank, R. (2000). Towards a two-dimensional proteome map of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Electrophoresis 21, 3765–3780.[CrossRef][Medline]

Rocha, E. P. & Blanchard, A. (2002). Genomic repeats, genome plasticity and the dynamics of Mycoplasma evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 30, 2031–2042.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rosengarten, R., Citti, C., Glew, M., Lischewski, A., Droesse, M., Much, P., Winner, F., Brank, M. & Spergser, J. (2000). Host-pathogen interactions in mycoplasma pathogenesis: virulence and survival strategies of minimalist prokaryotes. Int J Med Microbiol 290, 15–25.[Medline]

Ruland, K., Wenzel, R. & Herrmann, R. (1990). Analysis of three different repeated DNA elements present in the P1 operon of Mycoplasma pneumoniae: size, number and distribution on the genome. Nucleic Acids Res 18, 6311–6317.[Abstract]

Ruland, K., Himmelreich, R. & Herrmann, R. (1994). Sequence divergence in the ORF6 gene of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. J Bacteriol 176, 5202–5209.[Abstract]

Sperker, B., Hu, P. & Herrmann, R. (1991). Identification of gene products of the P1 operon of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Mol Microbiol 5, 299–306.[Medline]

Su, C. J., Tryon, V. V. & Baseman, J. B. (1987). Cloning and sequence analysis of cytadhesin P1 gene from Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Infect Immun 55, 3023–3029.[Medline]

Su, C. J., Chavoya, A., Dallo, S. F. & Baseman, J. B. (1990). Sequence divergency of the cytadhesin gene of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Infect Immun 58, 2669–2674.[Medline]

Taylor-Robinson, D. (1996). Infections due to species of Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma: an update. Clin Infect Dis 23, 671–682; quiz 683–684.[Medline]

Tully, J. (1983). Cloning and filtration techniques for mycoplasmas. In Methods in Mycoplasmology, pp. 173–177. Edited by S. Razin & J. Tully. New York: Academic Press.

Ueberle, B., Frank, R. & Herrmann, R. (2002). The proteome of the bacterium Mycoplasma pneumoniae: comparing predicted open reading frames to identified gene products. Proteomics 2, 754–764.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wasinger, V. C., Pollack, J. D. & Humphery-Smith, I. (2000). The proteome of Mycoplasma genitalium. Chaps-soluble component. Eur J Biochem 267, 1571–1582.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Weiner, J., 3rd, Herrmann, R. & Browning, G. F. (2000). Transcription in Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Nucleic Acids Res 28, 4488–4496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Weiner, J., 3rd, Zimmerman, C. U., Gohlmann, H. W. & Herrmann, R. (2003). Transcription profiles of the bacterium Mycoplasma pneumoniae grown at different temperatures. Nucleic Acids Res 31, 6306–6320.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wenzel, R. & Herrmann, R. (1989). Cloning of the complete Mycoplasma pneumoniae genome. Nucleic Acids Res 17, 7029–7043.[Abstract]

Received 22 July 2004; revised 22 September 2004; accepted 23 September 2004.



This Article
Abstract
Full Text (PDF)
Supplementary files
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Citation Map
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Articles by Catrein, I.
Articles by Herrmann, R.
Articles citing this Article
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Catrein, I.
Articles by Herrmann, R.
Agricola
Articles by Catrein, I.
Articles by Herrmann, R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2004 Society for General Microbiology.