Compaction of the Escherichia coli nucleoid caused by Cyt1Aa

Robert Manasherob, Arieh Zaritsky, Yifah Metzler, Eitan Ben-Dov, Mark Itsko and Itzhak Fishov

Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, PO Box 653, Be'er-Sheva 84105, Israel

Correspondence
Robert Manasherob
ariehz{at}bgumail.bgu.ac.il


   ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Compaction of the Escherichia coli nucleoid in the cell's centre was associated with the loss of colony-forming ability; these effects were caused by induction of Cyt1Aa, the cytotoxic 27 kDa protein from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. Cyt1Aa-affected compaction of the nucleoids was delayed but eventually more intense than compaction caused by chloramphenicol. The possibility that small, compact nucleoids in Cyt1Aa-expressing cells resulted in DNA replication run-out and segregation following cell division was ruled out by measuring relative nucleoid length. Treatments with membrane-perforating substances other than Cyt1Aa did not cause such compaction of the nucleoids, but rather the nucleoids overexpanded to occupy nearly all of the cell volume. These findings support the suggestion that, in addition to its perforating ability, Cyt1Aa causes specific disruption of nucleoid associations with the cytoplasmic membrane. In situ immunofluorescence labelling with Alexa did not demonstrate a great amount of Cyt1Aa associated with the membrane. Clear separation between Alexa-labelled Cyt1Aa and 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-stained DNA indicates that the nucleoid does not bind Cyt1Aa. Around 2 h after induction, nucleoids in Cyt1Aa-expressing cells started to decompact and expanded to fill the whole cell volume, most likely due to partial cell lysis without massive peptidoglycan destruction.


Abbreviations: CAM, chloramphenicol; DAPI, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; DPH, 1,3-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene; GFP, green fluorescent protein


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
During sporulation, various subspecies of the Gram-positive soil bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis produce large amounts of insecticidal crystal proteins (ICP), the so-called {delta}-endotoxins (Schnepf et al., 1998), each toxic against larvae of a different group of insects. The ICP of B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis is specific against the larvae of mosquitoes and black flies (Goldberg & Margalit, 1977; Margalith & Ben-Dov, 2000), vectors of many human infectious diseases (Service, 1986). The crystal is composed of four major polypeptides, Cry4Aa, Cry4Ba, Cry11Aa and Cyt1Aa (of 125, 135, 68 and 28 kDa, respectively), which are encoded by genes carried on the ~130 kDa plasmid nicknamed pBtoxis (Ben-Dov et al., 1999). Cyt1Aa, which is not homologous to any of the known Cry toxins (Crickmore et al., 1998), is the most prominent of the four polypeptides, but it is less specific than Cry4Aa, Cry4Ba and Cry11Aa, haemolytic and cytotoxic in vitro (Thomas & Ellar, 1983b; Drobniewski & Ellar, 1988; Hofte & Whiteley, 1989). The broad cytolytic activity of Cyt1Aa has been attributed to its hydrophobicity and ability to bind zwitterionic phospholipids (Thomas & Ellar, 1983a, b). Cyt1Aa is inserted into the membrane to create cation-selective single channels of 1–2 nm in diameter, leading to colloid-osmotic lysis (Knowles & Ellar, 1987; Knowles et al., 1989), and induces leakage of low-molecular-mass substances from lipid vesicles (Drobniewski & Ellar, 1988, 1989).

Seven cytolytic, mosquitocidal-specific toxins are currently known (Earp & Ellar, 1987; Drobniewski & Ellar, 1989; Yu et al., 1991; Koni & Ellar, 1993; Cheong & Gill, 1997; Guerchicoff et al., 1997; Thiery et al., 1997). Using heavy-atom isomorphous replacement, the crystal structure of Cyt2Aa from B. thuringiensis subsp. kyushuensis has recently been found to have a single pore-forming domain, composed of two outer layers of {alpha}-helix hairpins wrapped around mixed {beta}-sheets (Li et al., 1996). Due to high similarity (70 %) in its amino acid sequence to Cyt2Aa, Cyt1Aa is supposed to show a similar folding pattern to Cyt2Aa (Li et al., 1996; Gazit et al., 1997).

The level of mosquito larvicidal activity of Cyt1Aa by itself is low, but it raises synergistically the activity of Cry4Aa, Cry4Ba or Cry11Aa, to a greater extent than the synergism obtained by combination of the three Cry polypeptides themselves (Crickmore et al., 1995; Khasdan et al., 2001). The role of Cyt1Aa in delaying the development of resistance to the Cry proteins is critical (Georghiou & Wirth, 1997; Wirth & Georghiou, 1997; Wirth et al., 1997).

Recombinant Escherichia coli (Douek et al., 1992) and acrystalliferous B. thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki (Wu & Federici, 1993) lose colony-forming ability upon expressing Cyt1Aa. The accessory protein P20 protects them from this lethal action (Wu & Federici, 1993; Manasherob et al., 2001) and stabilizes Cyt1Aa post-translationally (Adams et al., 1989; Visick & Whiteley, 1991).

The hypothesis that recombinant E. coli cells expressing the cyt1Aa gene die by inhibition of DNA synthesis (Douek et al., 1992) is consistent with the high affinity of Cyt1Aa for phosphatidylethanolamine (Thomas & Ellar, 1983b), the major DNA-bound E. coli phospholipid (Ballesta et al., 1972). This hypothesis predicts that the target is the chromosome replication complex (Douek et al., 1992). Indeed, truncated Cyt1Aa (lacking 29 N-terminal amino acids) binds endogenous and heterologous DNA at similar rates in vitro (Yokoyama et al., 1998).

In an attempt to clarify the lethal action of Cyt1Aa on E. coli cells expressing its gene, nucleoids were visualized and their states determined by combined fluorescence and phase-contrast microscopy of cells stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). The kinetics of nucleoid compaction induced by Cyt1Aa was compared to that affected by chloramphenicol (CAM). In addition, associated changes in the permeability and viscosity of E. coli cell membrane were studied. In situ immunofluorescence labelling was used to establish independently where Cyt1Aa resides within cells.


   METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Bacterial strains and plasmids.
The following plasmids were hosted in E. coli XL-Blue MRF' (Stratagene) which is relA1. (a) pUHE-24S, a modified version of pUHE-24 from which one NcoI site was removed, leaving a unique NcoI site in the translation start codon. pUHE-24 is a descendant of pDS (Deuschle et al., 1986) containing a T5 RBS (Bujard et al., 1987), two tandem copies of lacO and the early T7 ({sigma}70-activated) promoter PA1 (utilizing the usual E. coli RNA polymerase). (b) pRM4-C and pRM4-RC, which carry cyt1Aa and p20+cyt1Aa, respectively (Manasherob et al., 2001). (c) pMC208-GFP (obtained from C. L. Woldringh, University of Amsterdam) was used as a template for green fluorescent protein (GFP) amplification. (d) pK-37, a pUC9 derivative with a 9·7 kb HindIII fragment (Douek et al., 1992) of pBtoxis from B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis (Ben-Dov et al., 1999), was used as a template for cyt1Aa amplification. Plasmids pRM4-C, pRM4-RC and pREP4 (containing lacIq; Qiagen) were hosted in the isogenic strains RL331T (RelA+) and RL332T (relA) (Ryals et al., 1982).

Viable cell counts.
Viability of cells was determined by colony-forming ability on Luria–Bertani (LB) plates (with 100 µg ampicillin ml-1 and 10 µg tetracycline ml-1) following appropriate dilutions. The number of colonies was counted after 24 h incubation at 37 °C. Each point is a mean of a duplicate in three different dilutions. For detection of cells that were not sensitive to the Cyt1Aa lethal effect, IPTG-containing LB plates were used.

Amino acid starvation.
To starve the cells of amino acids, a culture of RL331T (RelA+) or RL332T (relA) harbouring pRM4-C and pREP4 grown in M-9 minimal salts medium supplemented with 0·4 % glucose and 1 % casein hydrolysate was filtered and resuspended (at twice the concentration) in the same medium without casein hydrolysate. Transforming these strains with pRM4-C alone failed, presumably because they lack lacIq and hence express cyt1Aa constitutively and die on LB plates.

Membrane permeability for DAPI.
Aliquots (3 ml) from steady-state cultures were transferred to a cuvette at 37 °C and stirred in a spectrofluorometer (model LS50B; Perkin Elmer). Kinetics of fluorescence intensity of DAPI (1 µg ml-1) were recorded following addition of this dye to the culture samples, using excitation and emission wavelengths of 360 and 470 nm, and 2·5 and 5·0 nm slits, respectively.

Fluorescence anisotropy.
Apparent membrane viscosity and dynamics of cells were inferred from measurements of fluorescence anisotropy of 1,3-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene (DPH), following the general procedure described previously (Zaritsky et al., 1985; Parola et al., 1990; Binenbaum et al., 1999). Steady-state values were measured at 37 °C by spectrofluorometry (LS50B; Perkin Elmer) using excitation and emission wavelengths of 360 and 430 nm, and 2·5 and 7·0 nm slits, respectively, in the ‘Read’ mode, with a 3 s integration time. Five to six readings were taken for each sample, providing an estimated instrumental error of ~1 %.

Recombinant DNA methods.
DNA modifications were performed as recommended by the enzymes' suppliers. Competent cells were prepared and plasmids were isolated by standard procedures (Sambrook & Russell, 2001). Transformants were selected on LB plates containing 100 µg ampicillin ml-1 and 10 µg tetracycline ml-1. DNA run on horizontal agarose slab gels (0·7 %) was visualized by staining with ethidium bromide. DNA fragments were purified from the gels by phenol extraction (Seth, 1984).

Gene expression.
Cultures were grown at 37 °C in LB broth supplemented with 100 µg ampicillin ml-1 and 10 µg tetracycline ml-1; they were induced by addition of IPTG (0·5 mM) when they reached an OD660 value of 0·2–0·3 (~2x108 cells ml-1). Cells were harvested by centrifugation at various times after induction and resuspended in distilled water; aliquots were boiled (10 min) in sample treatment buffer [62·5 mM Tris/HCl, 2 % SDS, 10 % (v/v) glycerol, 0·01 % Bromophenol blue and 0·1 M DTT]. Protease inhibitor 4-(2-aminoethyl)benzenesulfonyl fluoride hydrochloride (AEBSF) was added at 4 mM (final concentration) during sample preparations to prevent proteolysis. Samples were analysed by discontinuous SDS-PAGE using 4·5 % acrylamide (pH 6·8) and 12 % acrylamide (pH 8·8) for the stacking and separating gels, respectively (Laemmli, 1970). The gels were stained with 0·1 % Coomassie blue R-250. Protein concentrations were determined according to Bradford (1976) with BSA as standard.

Western blot.
Proteins were electrotransferred from SDS-polyacrylamide gels onto nitrocellulose membranes and exposed to a specific antiserum directed against Cyt1Aa (kindly provided by S. S. Gill, University of California, USA). Protein A–alkaline phosphatase conjugate was used as a primary antibody detector. Visualization of the antigen was done with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate/nitro blue tetrazolium tablets (Sigma), the chromogenic substrate for alkaline phosphatase.

In situ immunofluorescence labelling.
Cells were grown in LB medium to an OD660 value of ~0·6 and fixed by adding 2·8 % formaldehyde and 0·04 % glutaraldehyde (final concentrations). For permeabilization, the cells were harvested by centrifugation (7000 g, 5 min), washed twice in PBS (137 mM NaCl, 2·7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 2 mM KH2PO4, pH 7·2), and incubated in 0·1 % Triton X-100-containing PBS for 45 min at room temperature. The cells were washed three times in PBS and incubated in PBS containing 100 µg lysozyme ml-1 and 5 mM EDTA for 45 min at room temperature. Finally, the cells were washed three times in PBS. Non-specific binding sites were blocked by incubation in 0·5 % (w/v) blocking reagents (Boehringer) in PBS for 30 min at 37 °C. Incubation with primary polyclonal antibodies against Cyt1Aa (diluted 1 : 500 in blocking buffer) was carried out for 60 min at 37 °C. Excess antibodies were removed, and the cells were washed three times with PBS containing 0·05 % (v/v) Tween 20. Incubation in the dark with Alexa 546 conjugated to goat anti-rabbit IgG (Molecular Probes), diluted in blocking buffer, was carried out for 30 min at 37 °C. The cells were washed three times in PBS containing 0·05 % Tween 20. The nucleoids were stained with DAPI at a final concentration of 1 µg ml-1 in H2O. The cells were washed once in H2O and resuspended in PBS.

Microscopy.
Samples of steady-state exponentially growing cultures (Fishov et al., 1995) were fixed (0·25 % formaldehyde) and immobilized on agarose slides as described by Van Helvoort & Woldringh (1994). Prior to immobilization, the samples were stained with DAPI for visualizing nucleoids and their states by combined fluorescence and phase-contrast microscopy (ZEISS Axioplan 2 fluorescence microscope, equipped with Plan-Neofluar 100x/1·3 oil immersion lens and SPOT2 cooled CCD camera; Diagnostic Instruments). Cells were photographed by combined phase-contrast mode with a DAPI fluorescence filter (U-MWU; excitation at 330–385 nm), an Alexa filter (U-MNG; excitation at 530–550 nm) or differential interference contrast (DIC; Nomarski) optics, using the program IPLAB 3.1a (Signal Analytics).

Microscopic measurements and image analysis.
Interactive measurements were performed as structured point collection on a Macintosh G3 computer by using the public domain program OBJECT-IMAGE1.62 (Vischer et al., 1994), which is based on NIH IMAGE by Wayne Rasband. Photographs were stacked, and the lengths of each cell and their nucleoid(s) were measured by indicating the end points of their major axes. Relative nucleoid length, defined as the ratio between nucleoid length (sum of lengths of all nucleoids in a cell) to cell length, allows estimation of nucleoid compaction independently of the number of nucleoids per cell (Van Helvoort et al., 1996). Each point is based on measurements of at least 150 cells.

Kinetics of nucleoid compaction caused by Cyt1Aa and CAM.
A steady-state exponentially growing culture of cells (Fishov et al., 1995) harbouring pRM4-C (carrying cyt1Aa) was split into two flasks; CAM (100 µg ml-1) was added to one (either with or without 10 µg nalidixic acid ml-1) and IPTG (0·5 mM) was added to the other. Compaction of DAPI-stained nucleoids was measured at different times using combined phase-contrast fluorescence micrographs, from which mean relative nucleoid length was calculated.

Construction of a Cyt1Aa–GFP fusion.
To this end, fusion by gene splicing by overlap extension (SOE) was used (Horton et al., 1989). A 737 bp amplicon with a truncated cyt1Aa gene was obtained by using pK-37 and the primers D-cyt [a 31-mer; 5'-GAAAGGCCAGAATTCTAATTAACTTAAGGAG-3'; containing an EcoRI site (shown in bold; nucleotides 10–15)] and R-cyt (a 47-mer; 5'-GTTCTTCTCCTTTGCTAGCCATCAAAGATTGGATGTTAACATTGTAG-3'). A 782 bp amplicon with a complete gfp gene was obtained by using pMC208-GFP and the primers D-gfp (a 47-mer; 5'-CTACAATGTTAACATCCAATCTTTGATGGCTAGCAAAGGAGAAGAAC-3') and R-gfp [a 27-mer; 5'-CACGACGTTCTAGAACGACGGCCAGTG-3'; containing a XbaI site (shown in bold; nucleotides 9–14)]. The 3' end of R-cyt is complementary to the 5' region of D-gfp. Since Cyt1Aa is processed similarly at both termini by proteases to yield the activated toxin (Al-yahyaee & Ellar, 1995), gfp was fused to cyt1Aa so that Cyt1Aa was truncated at its C terminus to prevent cleavage of the Cyt1Aa–GFP fusion protein in the cell. Since Lys-225 of Cyt1Aa is the potential cleavage site for several proteases (Al-yahyaee & Ellar, 1995), cyt1Aa was amplified to include Leu-224 as the last residue. The two amplicons were mixed, denatured and allowed to re-anneal. The resulting fusion product was amplified further by using primers D-cyt and R-gfp. The final 1470 bp PCR product was purified using the Wizard PCR preps DNA purification kit (Promega) and digested with EcoRI and XbaI, yielding a 1456 bp fragment that was further purified from a 1·5 % agarose gel and cloned into pUHE24S to pRM4C-GFP. Amplification was carried out with high-fidelity Vent DNA polymerase (New England BioLabs) in a DNA thermal cycler (Hybaid) for a 28-reaction cycle, each with the following parameters: 1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at 50 °C and 40 s at 72 °C.


   RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Lethal effect of Cyt1Aa
Cell lysis by the Cyt1Aa protein from B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis is not mediated by receptor binding; it is caused by perforation of the cytoplasmic membrane (Gazit et al., 1997; Gill et al., 1992). The pores (of 1–2 nm in diameter) are selective cation channels in the phosphatidylethanolamine planar bilayer (Knowles et al., 1992) that cause an influx of water that leads to colloid osmotic lysis (Knowles et al., 1989). In addition to its cytolytic activity against a broad range of invertebrate and vertebrate cells (Drobniewski & Ellar, 1989; Hofte & Whiteley, 1989; Thomas & Ellar, 1983b), Cyt1Aa is lethal to E. coli (Douek et al., 1992; Manasherob et al., 2001), an effect that is associated with a block in DNA synthesis. An exponentially growing culture of E. coli stopped increasing in mass upon induction with IPTG (Fig. 1A), while the colony-forming ability of the cells on LB agar plates decreased by four orders of magnitude during 30 min (Fig. 1B). Cyt1Aa was detected by Western blot 2 min after induction and reached its maximum level after 10 min (Fig. 2). Plating on LB agar with IPTG (Fig. 1B) exposed the survivors, most likely spontaneous mutants that gained resistance to the lethal effect of Cyt1Aa or lost the insert before expression. The presence of pRM4-C and cyt1Aa in survivors was confirmed by isolating the plasmid and restriction mapping the insert, but no Cyt1Aa was detected by Western blot (data not shown).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Mass growth (A) and viable cell counts (B) of exponentially growing ({circ}) E. coli cells (harbouring pRM4-C) and after induction ({bullet}) with 0·5 mM IPTG (producing Cyt1Aa). {blacktriangleup}, Viability of Cyt1Aa-resistant cells.

 


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Immunoblot of Cyt1Aa in extracts of pRM4-C-containing cells at various times after IPTG induction.

 
Membrane involvement and properties
Cyt1Aa is known to non-specifically perforate plasma membranes upon binding to phospholipids (Thomas & Ellar, 1983a). Indeed, DAPI, which is not taken up by intact E. coli cells (e.g. Sun & Margolin, 2001), efficiently entered Cyt1Aa-producing E. coli cells 15 min following induction (Fig. 3A), much later than the appearance of Cyt1Aa (Fig. 2). This sequence of events is consistent with the suggestion that Cyt1Aa perforates the cell membrane as an oligomer of half a dozen monomers (Gazit et al., 1997).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Intensities of DAPI uptake (A) and DPH fluorescence anisotropy (B) displayed by exponentially growing E. coli cells harbouring pRM4-C or pUHE24S. (B) Cells harbouring pRM4-C before ({circ}) and after ({bullet}) induction.

 
Two hypotheses were reported in the literature describing the mechanism of membrane disruption by Cyt1Aa – perforation (Gazit et al., 1997) or detergent-like (Butko et al., 1996, 1997). Membrane fluidity (measured by anisotropy of DPH fluorescence; Binenbaum et al., 1999) did not change following induction of cyt1Aa (Fig. 3B), supporting the suggestion that Cyt1Aa forms distinct transmembrane pores (Gazit et al., 1997; Li et al., 1996). This result, however, does not preclude a detergent-like effect because minor changes at a small number of specific sites may not be detected by this gross membrane fluidity determination.

Nucleoid compaction and structure
The chromosome replication complex has been implicated as the target for Cyt1Aa in E. coli (Douek et al., 1992) because the membrane fraction attached to DNA is enriched in phosphatidylethanolamine (Ballesta et al., 1972), which is among those phospholipids known to preferentially interact with Cyt1Aa (Thomas & Ellar, 1983b). The expanded nucleoids visualized by DAPI in exponentially growing cells, uninduced (Fig. 4A) or lacking cyt1Aa (Fig. 4C), were found to dramatically compact in the cell centre following intracellular synthesis of Cyt1Aa (Fig. 4B). A similar compaction caused by CAM in uninduced cells (Fig. 4D) served as a positive control. The nucleoids remained dispersed in cells expressing p20 as well (data not shown), consistent with P20 protecting E. coli cells from the lethal action of Cyt1Aa (Manasherob et al., 2001). To rule out the possibility that the smaller nucleoids in Cyt1Aa-expressing cells (Fig. 4B) were the result of cell division as a consequence of DNA replication run-out and chromosome segregation, division was inhibited by cephalexin (8 µg ml-1). The multiple segregating nucleoids in the filaments (Fig. 4E) seem to highly compact and fuse upon expressing Cyt1Aa (Fig. 4F). Measuring nucleoid length relative to non-filamentous cell length substantiated this finding (Fig. 5). Mean nucleoid length halved (from 2·87±0·08 to 1·30±0·03 µm), while the mean cell length decreased by only 14 % (from 4·40±0·10 to 3·80±0·095 µm), leading to a remarkably smaller relative nucleoid length (0·34) under the influence of Cyt1Aa than without (0·65) (Fig. 5B). This quantification demonstrates that compaction of the nucleoids did occur. The nucleoids did not compact due to cessation of DNA replication per se: no compaction occurs when DNA synthesis stops rapidly in dna-ts mutants (Mulder & Woldringh, 1989) or with nalidixic acid (data not shown).



View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Nucleoid morphologies in DAPI-stained E. coli cells. Cells harbouring pRM4-C, uninduced (A), after 60 min IPTG induction (B) or treated with CAM (D). (C) Cells harbouring pUHE24S 60 min after induction. Filaments (with pRM4-C) were obtained by treatment with cephalexin (8 µg ml-1), IPTG-induced (F) or uninduced (E). Bars, 5 µm.

 


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. (A) Nucleoid length as a function of cell length in E. coli cells expressing Cyt1Aa ({bullet}) or not expressing Cyt1Aa ({circ}). (B) Frequencies of relative nucleoid lengths in 150 E. coli cells, uninduced (solid bars) and 60 min after IPTG induction (open bars).

 
Nucleoid structure and shape seem to be determined by a balance between compaction and expansion forces (Woldringh, 2002). Compaction may be exerted by DNA supercoiling and phase separation from the cytoplasm, as well as by DNA-binding proteins. Coupled transcription, translation and insertion (‘transertion’) of the nascent membrane and exported proteins are considered to expand the nucleoid (Norris, 1995; Woldringh et al., 1995). A compact nucleoid in the cell's centre and a reduced number of membrane attachment sites induced by rifampicin or CAM (Dworsky & Schaechter, 1973; Morgan et al., 1967; Van Helvoort et al., 1998; Zusman et al., 1973) have been explained by disrupting this coupling and causing an imbalance favouring the compaction forces (Binenbaum et al., 1999). Hence, nucleoid compaction by Cyt1Aa can occur by disrupting the DNA–membrane interactions. Can it also occur by membrane perforation per se, as in cyt1Aa-induced cells (Fig. 4B)?

To test this hypothesis, other agents that disrupt membranes were exploited. Triton X-100 (0·1 %; Fig. 6A) and protamin (100 µg ml-1; Fig. 6B) did not cause compaction; on the contrary, the DNA was dispersed over the whole cell volume. This effect may be explained by an efflux of low-molecular-mass compounds or a loss of macromolecular crowding. Membrane perforation results in the leakage of small molecules such as ATP from bacterial cells (Johansen et al., 1997) and a reduced ability to synthesize ATP. Obstructing ATP-dependent gyrase should thus expand the nucleoid by creating an imbalance of forces. Such nucleoid expansion has indeed been observed with KCN treatment (Van Helvoort, 1996), which blocks terminal oxidation in the respiratory chain of E. coli. The other interpretation that this decompaction is due to the loss of macromolecular crowding in the cytoplasm is consistent with similar results published by others (Murphy & Zimmerman, 2001), where a limited loss of DNA compaction accompanied cytoplasm leakage from E. coli cells.



View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. DAPI-stained cells photographed under simultaneous phase-contrast/DAPI fluorescence exposure, treated with membrane-active agents: (A) Triton X-100; (B) protamin; (C) toluene. Bars, 5 µm.

 
If the pores produced by Cyt1Aa in the plasma membrane of E. coli cells are of the same size as those produced in Culex fumiferana cells treated with Cyt1Aa (cut-off of about 360 Da) (Knowles & Ellar, 1987), ATP (507 Da) is very likely trapped inside E. coli cells, thus allowing run-out of mRNA. This run-out releases DNA from the membrane resulting in nucleoid compaction, as observed under treatment with CAM (Binenbaum et al., 1999). This suggestion is consistent with nucleoid expansion in cells treated with protamin (Fig. 6B), which dramatically reduces intracellular ATP levels (Johansen et al., 1997).

Upon treatment with perforating agents or Cyt1Aa, cells took up DAPI (of 350 Da) (Haugland, 1996) due to perforation of the membrane without the otherwise necessary pre-fixation with formaldehyde (Sun & Margolin, 2001). However, to prevent cell lysis by protamin (Johansen et al., 1997), this agent was used at such a low concentration that not all cells were stained by DAPI (Fig. 6B). Fast nucleoid staining by DAPI in unfixed Cyt1Aa-expressing (Fig. 4B) or protamin-treated cells (Fig. 6B) confirms penetration into the cell through pores.

Treatment of the E. coli cells with toluene (10 µl ml-1) (Fig. 6C) resulted in variable, random nucleoid positions in the cell periphery. Similar nucleoid shapes and distribution with no explanation have been observed by electron microscopy (Woldringh, 1973). These results may be due to an abrupt and uneven detachment of the nucleoid from the membrane caused by toluene, in contrast to the uniform detachment seen upon expression of Cyt1Aa. Fast detachment from large portions of the membrane leaves the nucleoid connected to other portions of the membrane that are still intact.

Relative nucleoid length
The impression that nucleoid compaction caused by Cyt1Aa is more intense than that caused by CAM (Fig. 4B and D, respectively) was substantiated by comparing the kinetics of nucleoid compaction under both conditions. In CAM-treated cells, compaction was observed after 5 min and completed after 10 min, while in cells expressing Cyt1Aa compaction started after 20 min (Fig. 7). The final compaction observed with Cyt1Aa after 40 min was significantly more effective (relative nucleoid length halved, from 0·67 to 0·3; Fig. 7B) than that observed with CAM (decrease by a third, to 0·45). This difference may reflect the different states of DNA: while there is replication run-out with CAM during about 40 min (Pato, 1975), Cyt1Aa was shown to stop DNA synthesis immediately (Douek et al., 1992). However, inhibition of replication by nalidixic acid did not change the rate or the extent of nucleoid compaction caused by CAM (Fig. 7B, inset). Furthermore, Cyt1Aa-affected nucleoid detachment from the membrane seemed to be asymmetrical (Fig. 7A): at 20 min, the nucleoid was dislodged from the cylindrical portion of cell envelope only, while the length decreased 5 min later (Fig. 7B), seen as withdrawal from cell poles (Fig. 7A). This sequential, slower compaction may allow ordered packaging, thus resulting in the observed tighter nucleoids.



View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Changes in nucleoid morphology (A) and relative nucleoid length (B) in cells (with pRM4-C) after addition of CAM ({bullet}) or IPTG ({blacktriangleup}). (B) Mean and standard errors of 150 cells are displayed for each point. Inset, mean nucleoid length of E. coli (strain B/r) after addition of CAM alone ({blacksquare}) and with nalidixic acid ({square}).

 
The three morphometric differences in nucleoid compaction affected by Cyt1Aa and CAM (timing, degree and shape) suggest that the two agents operate to change nucleoid morphology via different modes. This is consistent with a failure to probe DNA detachment in cyt1Aa-induced cells by DPH anisotropy (Fig. 3B), as found in CAM-treated cultures (Fig. 2 in Binenbaum et al., 1999).

Following cyt1Aa induction, there is an accumulation of Cyt1Aa in the cell for 10 min, to a concentration (Fig. 2) required to disrupt the membrane barrier ability after 15 min (Fig. 3A) and to compact the nucleoid after 20 min (Fig. 7). This sequence of events is consistent with a crucial role for Cyt1Aa in nucleoid compaction, but not by perforation: various perforating chemicals preferentially disperse the nucleoid (Fig. 6A and B).

Localizing Cyt1Aa
Overcompaction of the nucleoid may also be affected by DNA-binding proteins such as the histone-like HU protein that binds throughout the nucleoid interior (Shellman & Pettijohn, 1991). Cyt1Aa has been found to bind DNA in vivo and in vitro (Yokoyama et al., 1998). To locate the site of its action, Cyt1Aa was fused with GFP (Cormack et al., 1996). Cells that expressed the fused gene were not killed (data not shown), indicating that proper folding of the C terminus of Cyt1Aa is crucial for its activity, and supporting the view that its lethal effect is specific rather than caused by overexpression per se (Manasherob et al., 2001). We have, therefore, resorted to using in situ immunofluorescence labelling which has been successfully applied to locate numerous bacterial proteins (e.g. Buddelmeijer et al., 1998).

In cells expressing Cyt1Aa for 60 min, Alexa fluorescence was localized at the poles (Fig. 8A), where no DNA material (DAPI fluorescence) was present (Fig. 8B), while co-expression of P20 resulted in uniform granulation all over the cell (Fig. 8C), irrespective of DNA localization (Fig. 8D). This clear separation between Cyt1Aa and DNA (Fig. 8A and B) indicates that the toxin is excluded from the area of condensed nucleoid. This exclusion is not necessarily the result of a specific Cyt1Aa affinity for E. coli cell poles: total proteins (visualized by FITC) were similarly polarized under nucleoid compaction caused by CAM treatment (I. Fishov, unpublished observations). Nucleoid compaction itself may thus non-specifically ‘push’ proteins outward to the cell poles, Cyt1Aa included. This is supported by the lack of a partition between the Alexa-labelled Cyt1Aa in cells expressing it together with P20, where nucleoids are not compacted (Fig. 8D). The partition in the absence of P20 implies no Cyt1Aa binding all over the chromosome, but does not exclude binding at the nucleoid periphery.



View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Alexa-labelled Cyt1Aa fluorescence (A, C) and DAPI-stained cells (B, D) expressing Cyt1Aa alone (A, B; clone harbouring pRM4-C) or with P20 (C, D; with pRM4-RC), 60 min after induction.

 
No great association of Cyt1Aa with the cell membrane or the typical halo was observed, as predicted if the protein were incorporated and evenly distributed at the cell membrane. This finding does not necessarily contradict the observation that Cyt1Aa perforates the membrane (Fig. 3A), because effective perforation may not need massive membrane insertion of Cyt1Aa.

Partial lysis of cyt1Aa-induced cells
The tightly compacted nucleoids in cyt1Aa-induced cells started to disperse and expand to fill the whole cell volume at around 2 h after induction, while compacted CAM-treated nucleoids remained stable in the mid-cell (Fig. 7A). In contrast to the bacteriostatic effect of CAM, Cyt1Aa is bacteriocidal (Douek et al., 1992; Manasherob et al., 2001; Fig. 1B). This is reflected in reduced culture turbidity (Fig. 1A) and the cells' phase-contrast (data not shown), indicating that partial cell lysis occurred without massive peptidoglycan ‘destruction’ (Voss, 1964) following membrane perforation by Cyt1Aa. Such partial lysis leads to loss of the macromolecular crowding effect on DNA and allows it to expand and fill the whole cell volume (Zimmerman, 1993; Woldringh, 2002) in a similar way to that obtained by treatment of the cells with Triton X-100 and protamin (Fig. 6).

Amino acid starvation
Compaction of nucleoids caused by amino acid starvation of the relA1 mutant that does not occur in its isogenic stringent strain was explained (Binenbaum et al., 1999) by run-out of mRNA releasing the transertion elements rather than freezing them, as in the wild-type. Amino acid starvation would thus result in leakage of amino acids through the membrane pores formed by Cyt1Aa. The nucleoid of the stringent strain under cyt1Aa induction, on the other hand, would remain expanded due to ‘freezing’ of the transertion elements. This hypothesis was tested by inducing cyt1Aa in an isogenic stringent and a relaxed strain (RL331T and RL332T, respectively). Nucleoids were compacted in both strains (data not shown), precluding this possibility.

Concluding remarks and speculations
Overexpression of Cyt1Aa in E. coli cells arrests growth and DNA replication, and causes membrane perforation, loss of viability and nucleoid compaction. Loss of colony-forming ability is a likely consequence of membrane perforation, but various conceivable mechanisms as primary causes for nucleoid compaction were tested and rejected: i.e. membrane perforation per se, leakage of low-molecular-mass compounds, arrest of protein or RNA synthesis and increasing macromolecular crowding. A direct effect of Cyt1Aa on macromolecular synthesis is not excluded and requires special experiments in model systems.

Simultaneous, high-affinity interactions of Cyt1Aa with zwitterionic phospholipids as well as with DNA may enhance detachment of DNA from the membrane and, hence, affect nucleoid compaction. The observed extra compaction caused by Cyt1Aa over that caused by CAM treatment may be associated with the sequential, slower condensation of the DNA that allows ordered packaging, resulting in tighter nucleoids.

A non-insecticidal 28 kDa protein of B. thuringiensis subsp. shandongiensis exhibiting cytotoxicity by swelling of human leukaemic T cells and chromatin condensation (Lee et al., 2001) lends support to our observation that Cyt1Aa compacts the nucleoid of E. coli as well, irrespective of its mechanism(s) of action in both cases.


   ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
This investigation was partially supported by a grant (no. 2001-042) from the United States–Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF), Jerusalem, Israel. Aid in microscopy by Valery Erukhimovitch and Oleg Krichevsky is appreciated. Alex Aranovich is gratefully acknowledged for help in experiments. Thanks are due to Sarjeet S. Gill for antiserum against Cyt1Aa and to Gid'on Raziel for photography.


   REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Adams, L. F., Visick, J. E. & Whiteley, H. R. (1989). A 20-kilodalton protein is required for efficient production of the Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis 27-kilodalton crystal protein in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 171, 521–530.[Medline]

Al-yahyaee, S. A. S. & Ellar, D. J. (1995). Maximal toxicity of cloned CytA {delta}-endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis requires proteolytic processing from both the N- and C-termini. Microbiology 141, 3141–3148.

Ballesta, J. P., Cundliffe, E., Daniels, M. J., Silverstein, J. L., Susskind, M. M. & Schaechter, M. (1972). Some unique properties of the deoxyribonucleic acid-bearing portion of the bacterial membrane. J Bacteriol 112, 195–199.[Medline]

Ben-Dov, E., Nissan, G., Pelleg, N., Manasherob, R., Boussiba, S. & Zaritsky, A. (1999). Refined, circular restriction map of the Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis plasmid carrying the mosquito larvicidal genes. Plasmid 42, 186–191.[CrossRef][Medline]

Binenbaum, Z., Parola, A. H., Zaritsky, A. & Fishov, I. (1999). Transcription- and translation-dependent changes in membrane dynamics in bacteria: testing the transertion model for domain formation. Mol Microbiol 32, 1173–1182.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bradford, M. M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein–dye binding. Anal Biochem 72, 248–254.[CrossRef][Medline]

Buddelmeijer, N., Aarsman, M. E., Kolk, A. H., Vicente, M. & Nanninga, N. (1998). Localization of cell division protein FtsQ by immunofluorescence microscopy in dividing and nondividing cells of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 180, 6107–6116.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bujard, H., Gentz, R., Lanzer, M., Stueber, D., Mueller, M., Ibrahimi, I., Haeuptle, M. T. & Dobberstein, B. (1987). A T5 promoter-based transcription–translation system for the analysis of proteins in vitro and in vivo. Methods Enzymol 155, 416–433.[Medline]

Butko, P., Huang, F., Pusztai-Carey, M. & Surewicz, W. K. (1996). Membrane permeabilization induced by cytolytic {delta}-endotoxin CytA from Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis. Biochemistry 35, 11355–11360.[CrossRef][Medline]

Butko, P., Huang, F., Pusztai-Carey, M. & Surewicz, W. K. (1997). Interaction of the delta-endotoxin CytA from Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis with lipid membranes. Biochemistry 36, 12862–12868.[CrossRef][Medline]

Cheong, H. & Gill, S. S. (1997). Cloning and characterization of a cytolytic and mosquitocidal {delta}-endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. jegathesan. Appl Environ Microbiol 63, 3254–3260.[Abstract]

Cormack, B. P., Valdivia, R. H. & Falkow, S. (1996). FACS-optimized mutants of the green fluorescent protein (GFP). Gene 173, 33–38.[CrossRef][Medline]

Crickmore, N., Bone, E. J., Williams, J. A. & Ellar, D. J. (1995). Contribution of the individual components of the {delta}-endotoxin crystal to the mosquitocidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 131, 249–254.[CrossRef]

Crickmore, N., Zeigler, D. R., Feitelson, J., Schnepf, E., Van Rie, J., Lereclus, D., Baum, J. & Dean, D. H. (1998). Revision of the nomenclature for the Bacillus thuringiensis pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62, 807–813.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Deuschle, U., Kammerer, W., Gentz, R. & Bujard, H. (1986). Promoters of Escherichia coli: a hierarchy of in vivo strength indicates alternate structures. EMBO J 5, 2987–2994.[Abstract]

Douek, J., Einav, M. & Zaritsky, A. (1992). Sensitivity to plating of Escherichia coli cells expressing the cryA gene from Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis. Mol Gen Genet 232, 162–165.[Medline]

Drobniewski, F. A. & Ellar, D. J. (1988). Investigation of the membrane-lesion induced in vitro by two mosquitocidal {delta}-endotoxins of Bacillus thuringiensis. Curr Microbiol 16, 195–199.

Drobniewski, F. A. & Ellar, D. J. (1989). Purification and properties of a 28-kilodalton hemolytic and mosquitocidal protein toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. darmstadiensis 73-E10-2. J Bacteriol 171, 3060–3065.[Medline]

Dworsky, P. & Schaechter, M. (1973). Effect of rifampin on the structure and membrane attachment of the nucleoid of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 116, 1364–1374.[Medline]

Earp, D. J. & Ellar, D. J. (1987). Bacillus thuringiensis var. morrisoni strain PG14: nucleotide sequence of a gene encoding a 27 kDa crystal protein. Nucleic Acids Res 15, 3619.[Medline]

Fishov, I., Zaritsky, A. & Grover, N. B. (1995). On microbial states of growth. Mol Microbiol 15, 789–794.[Medline]

Gazit, E., Burshtein, N., Ellar, D. J., Sawyer, T. & Shai, Y. (1997). Bacillus thuringiensis cytolytic toxin associates specifically with its synthetic helices A and C in the membrane bound state. Implications for the assembly of oligomeric transmembrane pores. Biochemistry 36, 15546–15554.[CrossRef][Medline]

Georghiou, G. P. & Wirth, M. C. (1997). Influence of exposure to single versus multiple toxins of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis on development of resistance in the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae). Appl Environ Microbiol 63, 1095–1101.[Abstract]

Gill, S. S., Cowels, E. A. & Pietrantonio, P. V. (1992). The mode of action of Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxins. Annu Rev Entomol 37, 615–636.[CrossRef][Medline]

Goldberg, L. J. & Margalit, J. (1977). A bacterial spore demonstrating rapid larvicidal activity against Anopheles sergentii, Uranotaenia unguiculata, Culex univitattus, Aedes aegypti and Culex pipiens. Mosq News 37, 355–358.

Guerchicoff, A., Ugalde, R. A. & Rubinstein, C. P. (1997). Identification and characterization of a previously undescribed cyt gene in Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. Appl Environ Microbiol 63, 2716–2721.[Abstract]

Haugland, R. P. (1996). Handbook of Fluorescent Probes and Research Chemicals. 6th edn. OR, USA: Molecular Probes.

Hofte, H. & Whiteley, H. R. (1989). Insecticidal crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis. Microbiol Rev 53, 242–255.[Medline]

Horton, R. M., Hunt, H. D., Ho, S. N., Pullen, J. K. & Pease, L. R. (1989). Engineering hybrid genes without the use of restriction enzymes: gene splicing by overlap extension. Gene 77, 61–68.[CrossRef][Medline]

Johansen, C., Verheul, A., Gram, L., Gill, T. & Abee, T. (1997). Protamin-induced permeabilization of cell envelopes of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 63, 1155–1159.[Abstract]

Khasdan, V., Ben-Dov, E., Manasherob, R., Boussiba, S. & Zaritsky, A. (2001). Toxicity and synergism in transgenic Escherichia coli expressing four genes from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. Environ Microbiol 3, 798–806.[CrossRef][Medline]

Knowles, B. H. & Ellar, D. J. (1987). Colloid-osmotic lysis is a general feature of the mechanism of action of Bacillus thuringiensis {delta}-endotoxins with different insect specificities. Biochim Biophys Acta 924, 509–518.

Knowles, B. H., Blatt, M. R., Tester, M., Horsnell, J. M., Carroll, J., Menestrina, G. & Ellar, D. J. (1989). A cytolytic {delta}-endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis forms cation-selective channels in planar lipid bilayers. FEBS Lett 244, 259–262.[CrossRef][Medline]

Knowles, B. H., White, P. J., Nicholls, C. N. & Ellar, D. J. (1992). A broad spectrum cytolytic toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis var. kyushuensis. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 248, 1–7.[Medline]

Koni, P. A. & Ellar, D. J. (1993). Cloning and characterization of a novel Bacillus thuringiensis cytolytic delta-endotoxin. J Mol Biol 229, 319–327.[CrossRef][Medline]

Laemmli, U. K. (1970). Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680–685.[Medline]

Lee, D., Katayama, H., Akao, T., Maeda, M., Tanaka, R., Yamashita, S., Saitoh, H., Mizuki, E. & Ohba, M. (2001). A 28 kDa protein of the Bacillus thuringiensis serovar shandongiensis isolate 89-T-34-22 induces a human leukemic cell-specific cytotoxicity. Biochim Biophys Acta 1547, 57–63.[Medline]

Li, J., Koni, P. A. & Ellar, D. J. (1996). Structure of the mosquitocidal {delta}-endotoxin CytB from Bacillus thuringiensis sp. kyushuensis and implications for membrane pore formation. J Mol Biol 257, 129–152.[CrossRef][Medline]

Manasherob, R., Zaritsky, A., Ben-Dov, E., Saxena, D., Barak, Z. & Einav, M. (2001). Effect of accessory proteins P19 and P20 on cytolytic activity of Cyt1Aa from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis in Escherichia coli. Curr Microbiol 43, 355–364.[CrossRef][Medline]

Margalith, Y. & Ben-Dov, E. (2000). Biological control by Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. In Insect Pest Management: Techniques for Environmental Protection, pp. 243–301. J. E. Rechcigl & N. A. Rechcigl. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Morgan, C., Rosenkranz, H. S., Carr, H. S. & Rose, H. M. (1967). Electron microscopy of chloramphenicol-treated Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 93, 1987–2002.[Medline]

Mulder, E. & Woldringh, C. L. (1989). Actively replicating nucleoids influence positioning of division sites in Escherichia coli filaments forming cells lacking DNA. J Bacteriol 171, 4303–4314.[Medline]

Murphy, L. D. & Zimmerman, S. B. (2001). A limited loss of DNA compaction accompanying the release of cytoplasm from cells of Escherichia coli. J Struct Biol 133, 75–86.[CrossRef][Medline]

Norris, V. (1995). Hypothesis: chromosome separation in Escherichia coli involves autocatalytic gene expression, transertion and membrane-domain formation. Mol Microbiol 16, 1051–1057.[Medline]

Parola, A. H., Ibdah, M., Gill, D. & Zaritsky, A. (1990). Deviation from homeoviscous adaptation in Escherichia coli membranes. Biophys J 57, 621–626.[Abstract]

Pato, M. L. (1975). Alterations of the rate of movement of deoxyribonucleic acid replication forks. J Bacteriol 123, 272–277.[Medline]

Ryals, J., Little, R. & Bremer, H. (1982). Control of rRNA and tRNA syntheses in Escherichia coli by guanosine tetraphosphate. J Bacteriol 151, 1261–1268.[Medline]

Sambrook, J. & Russell, D. (2001). Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual, 3rd edn. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.

Schnepf, E., Crickmore, N., Van Rie, J., Lereclus, D., Baum, J., Feitelson, J., Zeigler, D. R. & Dean, D. H. (1998). Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62, 775–806.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Service, M. W. (editor) (1986). Blood-Sucking Insects: Vectors of Disease. London, UK: Edward Arnold.

Seth, A. (1984). A new method for linker ligation. Gene Anal Tech 1, 99–103.[CrossRef]

Shellman, V. L. & Pettijohn, D. E. (1991). Introduction of proteins into living bacterial cells: distribution of labeled HU protein in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 173, 3047–3059.[Medline]

Sun, Q. & Margolin, W. (2001). Influence of the nucleoid on placement of FtsZ and MinE rings in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 183, 1413–1422.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Thiery, I., Delecluse, A., Tamayo, M. C. & Orduz, S. (1997). Identification of a gene for Cyt1A-like hemolysin from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. medellin and expression in a crystal-negative B. thuringiensis strain. Appl Environ Microbiol 63, 468–473.[Abstract]

Thomas, W. E. & Ellar, D. J. (1983a). Mechanism of action of Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis insecticidal {delta}-endotoxin. FEBS Lett 154, 362–368.[CrossRef][Medline]

Thomas, W. E. & Ellar, D. J. (1983b). Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis crystal {delta}-endotoxin: effects on insect and mammalian cells in vitro and in vivo. J Cell Sci 60, 181–197.[Abstract]

Van Helvoort, J. M. L. M. (1996). A cytometric study of nucleoid partitioning. PhD thesis. Institute for Molecular Cell Biology, Section of Molecular Cytology, Biocentrum Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam.

Van Helvoort, J. M. L. M. & Woldringh, C. L. (1994). Nucleoid partitioning in Escherichia coli during steady-state growth and upon recovery from chloramphenicol treatment. Mol Microbiol 13, 577–583.[Medline]

Van Helvoort, J. M. L. M., Kool, J. & Woldringh, C. L. (1996). Chloramphenicol causes fusion of separated nucleoids in Escherichia coli K-12 cells and filaments. J Bacteriol 178, 4289–4293.[Abstract]

Van Helvoort, J. M. L. M., Huls, P. G., Vischer, N. O. E. & Woldringh, C. L. (1998). Fused nucleoids resegregate faster than cell elongation in Escherichia coli pbpB(Ts) filaments after release from chloramphenicol inhibition. Microbiology 144, 1309–1317.[Abstract]

Vischer, N. O. E., Huls, P. G. & Woldringh, C. L. (1994). OBJECT-IMAGE: an interactive image analysis program using structured point collection. Binary 6, 160–166.

Visick, J. E. & Whiteley, H. R. (1991). Effect of a 20-kilodalton protein from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis on production of the CytA protein by Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 173, 1748–1756.[Medline]

Voss, J. G. (1964). Lysozyme lysis of Gram-negative bacteria without production of spheroplasts. J Gen Microbiol 35, 313–317.[Medline]

Wirth, M. C. & Georghiou, G. P. (1997). Cross-resistance among CryIV toxins of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis in Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae). J Econ Entomol 90, 1471–1477.

Wirth, M. C., Georghiou, G. P. & Federici, B. A. (1997). CytA enables CryIV endotoxins of Bacillus thuringiensis to overcome high levels of CryIV resistance in the mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94, 10536–10540.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Woldringh, C. L. (1973). Effects of toluene and phenethyl alcohol on the ultrastructure of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 114, 1359–1361.[Medline]

Woldringh, C. L. (2002). The role of co-transcriptional translation and protein translocation (transertion) in bacterial chromosome segregation. Mol Microbiol Rev 45, 17–29.[CrossRef]

Woldringh, C. L., Jensen, P. R. & Westerhoff, H. V. (1995). Structure and partitioning of bacterial DNA: determined by a balance of compaction and expansion forces? FEMS Microbiol Lett 131, 235–242.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wu, D. & Federici, B. A. (1993). A 20-kilodalton protein preserves cell viability and promotes CytA crystal formation during sporulation in Bacillus thuringiensis. J Bacteriol 175, 5276–5280.[Abstract]

Yokoyama, Y., Kohda, K. & Okamoto, M. (1998). CytA protein, a {delta}-endotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis is associated with DNA. Biol Pharm Bull 21, 1263–1266.[Medline]

Yu, Y. M., Ohba, M. & Gill, S. S. (1991). Characterization of mosquitocidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. fukuokaensis crystal proteins. Appl Environ Microbiol 57, 1075–1081.[Medline]

Zaritsky, A., Parola, A. H., Ibdah, M. & Masalha, H. (1985). Homeoviscous adaptation, growth rate, and morphogenesis in bacteria. Biophys J 48, 337–339.[Abstract]

Zimmerman, S. B. (1993). Macromolecular crowding effects on macromolecular interactions: some implications for genome structure and function. Biochim Biophys Acta 1216, 175–185.[Medline]

Zusman, D. R., Carbonell, A. & Haga, J. Y. (1973). Nucleoid condensation and cell division in Escerichia coli MX74T2 ts52 after inhibition of protein synthesis. J Bacteriol 115, 1167–1178.[Medline]

Received 29 January 2003; revised 18 July 2003; accepted 18 July 2003.



This Article
Abstract
Full Text (PDF)
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Citation Map
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Articles by Manasherob, R.
Articles by Fishov, I.
Articles citing this Article
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Manasherob, R.
Articles by Fishov, I.
Agricola
Articles by Manasherob, R.
Articles by Fishov, I.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2003 Society for General Microbiology.