Closing in on Chlamydia and its intracellular bag of tricks

Patrik M. Bavoil1, Ru-ching Hsia1 and David M. Ojcius2

Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK1
Institut Pasteur, Unité de Biologie des Interactions Cellulaires, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France2

Author for correspondence: Patrik M.Bavoil. Tel: +44 20 7927 2290. Fax: +44 20 7612 7871. e-mail: p.bavoil{at}lshtm.ac.uk

Keywords: Chlamydia, pathogenesis, secretion


   Overview
TOP
Overview
Background
Comparative genomics
Chlamydia structure/physiology...
Interaction of Chlamydia with...
Membrane traffic in infected...
Perspective
REFERENCES
 
The genus Chlamydia encompasses a unique class of obligate intracellular bacteria, which cause infections in a wide range of animals and contribute to prevalent sexually transmitted, ocular and respiratory tract infectious diseases in humans. Consequences of chronic disease, to which Chlamydia owes most of its notoriety, include female infertility, blindness, arthritis and possibly coronary heart disease. In contrast to its pathogenic prominence, relatively little is known about the molecular mechanisms of Chlamydia infection, owing mostly to its unique intracellular developmental life style and resistance to genetic manipulation. Recent genomic information, however, in combination with new findings on the molecular and cell biology of infection, have allowed new insights into the biology of these unique organisms. The emerging picture is that of a micro-organism exploiting and subverting host signalling and trafficking pathways to its own developmental and pathogenic ends. To do so, the bacteria express a contact-dependent type III secretion (TTS) pathway, similar to that found in many other bacterial pathogens. Here, we suggest that Chlamydia TTS promotes bacterial survival and growth upon translocation of signals across the Chlamydia vacuole membrane. We hypothesize that these signals may be responsible for a range of activities, including inhibition of phagolysosome fusion, upregulation of transporters, and diversion of nutrients and constituent molecules from normal eukaryotic trafficking pathways. We further propose that inactivation of TTS upon loss of contact may provide a simple signal for the bacteria to irreversibly engage in late differentiation.


   Background
TOP
Overview
Background
Comparative genomics
Chlamydia structure/physiology...
Interaction of Chlamydia with...
Membrane traffic in infected...
Perspective
REFERENCES
 
Various species of Chlamydia continue to provoke serious infections of humans and animals worldwide, despite extensive work to better characterize the biology of the infection and develop effective vaccines. It is estimated that over 600 million people are infected with Chlamydia trachomatis, strains of which include the most common sexually transmitted bacterial pathogens (Gerbase et al., 1998 ) and also causative agents of conjunctivitis and trachoma. The latter are responsible for between 5 and 6 million current cases of blindness, thus representing the world’s leading cause of infectious blindness (Thylefors et al., 1995 ). More recently, there has been increasing interest in characterizing infections by Chlamydia pneumoniae, which are responsible for approximately a tenth of pneumonia cases in industrialized countries, and especially to determine if there is a link between previous infections with C. pneumoniae and increased risk of developing atherosclerosis (Grayston, 1999 ).

Chlamydiae have a biphasic developmental cycle. The extracellular form, the elementary body (EB), is infectious and is thought to be metabolically inert. The EB are internalized into host epithelial cells via small vacuoles resembling endosomes, most of which avoid fusion with host cell lysosomes. The EB differentiates within the entry vacuole into metabolically active reticulate bodies (RB), which are non-infectious (Moulder, 1991 ). Until now, efforts to understand molecular aspects of the infection have been hampered by systematic difficulties, including the lack of genetic tools to manipulate Chlamydia. In fact, Chlamydia is one of the rare human pathogens of any clinical importance that cannot be modified genetically. A second problem arises from the need to grow and extract chlamydiae from cultured eukaryotic cells, which leads to inactivation, alteration and contamination of the organisms. In the face of these difficulties, other lines of investigation, such as genome sequencing, assume disproportionate significance. Indeed, much information on this group of pathogens is currently being gleaned from comparative genomic analyses.


   Comparative genomics
TOP
Overview
Background
Comparative genomics
Chlamydia structure/physiology...
Interaction of Chlamydia with...
Membrane traffic in infected...
Perspective
REFERENCES
 
Extensive comparisons of the Chlamydia genomes among themselves and with those of other organisms have recently been published (Kalman et al., 1999 ; Makarova et al., 2000 ; Read et al., 2000 ; Stephens et al., 1998 ; Zomorodipour & Andersson, 1999 ). From these, a global understanding of chlamydial metabolic and biosynthetic capacities (McClarty, 1999 ; Stephens et al., 1998 ) has been the most tangible benefit. However, relatively little can yet be gleaned from genome comparisons on differential pathogenic properties of chlamydiae. Five of the six fully sequenced genomes are from chlamydiae infecting humans, with the remaining one being from the mouse biovar of C. trachomatis (MoPn), which was initially isolated from lungs of serially passaged mice inoculated with throat washings from clinical cases of human influenza (Nigg & Eaton, 1944 ). Moreover, only limited consideration of the evolutionary path of Chlamydia has been possible to date as the genome sample size is still too small (C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae). Genome analysis of several members of the more disparate Chlamydia psittaci group, with different host specificities, as well as some of the fringe Chlamydia-like strains, will probably be necessary before a comprehensive phylogeny can be drawn for the genus. The emerging picture, however, is one of a remarkably stable genome, with relatively few rearrangements and differentially expanded gene families. This suggests that genomic content was established early in chlamydial evolution, possibly prior to committing to intracellular life, and that divergence into different hosts has not been accompanied by major horizontal exchanges as is frequently observed in other, free-living, bacteria.

Based on the comparison of the C. pneumoniae and C. trachomatis genomes, Read et al. (2000 ) have described a plasticity zone near the origin of replication, which displays much higher genetic reorganization than the rest of the genome. Examples of genetic elements that are found in the plasticity zone are the tryptophan operon, which has been implicated in the development of persistent infection, and genes related to enterohaemorragic Escherichia coli and clostridial toxins (Burland et al., 1998 ; Makino et al., 1998 ; von Eichel-Streiber et al., 1996 ), in human genital and murine C. trachomatis, respectively. A process of reductive evolution, through the gradual dispensing of unessential genes, is likely to have followed the irreversible move of the ancestral form to an obligate intracellular lifestyle. The genomic stability that can be inferred from the sequenced Chlamydia genomes is also probably increased by the relative incapacity of the chlamydial genomes to expand through gene duplication. Hence few gene duplicates are found in Chlamydia, and the few that are found are mostly tandem duplications (Fig. 1) revealing minimal recombination activity. In the light of the relative ease of genome sequencing in Chlamydia, the conclusion that can be drawn at this time is that the genome sequencing effort should be continued to encompass the full spectrum of the genus. The restricted evolutionary path of this group of obligate intracellular micro-organisms, which paradoxically infect a broad range of hosts, can only be unravelled through a comprehensive comparative analysis. Moreover, in the absence of genetic methodologies, expanded comparative genomic and subsequent post-genomic analyses may be most fruitful in identifying the molecular and cellular bases for the array of virulence properties of chlamydiae.



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Paralogues in E. coli K-12 and in C. pneumoniae AR39. Gene duplications in E. coli (a) and C. pneumoniae AR39 (b) are displayed as plots of the coordinates of any given ORF on the genome (x axis) versus those of its paralogous match (y axis). The random scatter of numerous E. coli paralogues along the length of the chromosome represents high gene duplication and recombination activities. In contrast, the confinement of relatively few C. pneumoniae paralogues to the diagonal, i.e. tandem duplications, is a reflection of the low recombinational activity in C. pneumoniae. These plots are provided courtesy of Drs Jonathan Eisen and Tim Read (The Institute for Genomic Research).

 

   Chlamydia structure/physiology in the genomic spotlight
TOP
Overview
Background
Comparative genomics
Chlamydia structure/physiology...
Interaction of Chlamydia with...
Membrane traffic in infected...
Perspective
REFERENCES
 
Analysis of Chlamydia genome sequences has revealed that Chlamydia is, in many respects, closer to other bacteria than previously suspected. In particular, we must readdress experimentally the view that Chlamydia are Gram-negative bacteria that lack a classical peptidoglycan sacculus (Moulder, 1993 ) and that they are obligate energy parasites (Moulder, 1991 ). In fact, Chlamydia genomes contain genes necessary for peptidoglycan synthesis and several genes encoding enzymes involved in energy metabolism.

Peptidoglycan
Although the existence of a peptidoglycan layer in Chlamydia is now suggested by the genes, it is puzzling that its presence should have remained undetected, especially given the inhibitory effect of penicillin on chlamydial growth (Moulder, 1993 ). This paradox, known as the chlamydial anomaly, is currently being debated in the light of the genomic information. Trace amounts of muramic acid have been detected in only one study involving purified EB of C. trachomatis (Su et al., 1985 ). Other previous failed attempts to detect peptidoglycan constituents have all used purified EB, and only one attempt was made to specifically find peptidoglycan in RB (Barbour et al., 1982 ). This raises the possibility that the peptidoglycan is specifically degraded during differentiation of RB into EB by amidases, whose genes are present in the genome (Chopra et al., 1998 ). This hypothesis is consistent with the marked volume reduction during RB to EB differentiation and the presumed lack of structural requirement for peptidoglycan in EB (Hatch, 1996 ). Chopra et al. (1998 ) have hypothesized that the role of peptidoglycan in RB may then be to substitute for the FtsZ ring-shaped structure involved in cell envelope constriction, predicted to be missing in Chlamydia by virtue of the absence of the ftsZ gene in the genome. Conflicting with this interpretation, Ghuysen & Goffin (1999 ) predicted that Chlamydia synthesize a glycan-less ‘peptidoglycan’, i.e. a polypeptide. This hypothesis is derived from the observation that the C. trachomatis genome encodes two high-molecular-mass penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) of class B, which are devoid of the transglycosylase activity required for glycan chain elongation. They further propose that a weaker glycan-less sacculus might be strengthened by covalently linked lipoproteins, lipopolysaccharides and highly disulfide-cross-linked proteins associated with the outer membrane. Hatch (1996 ) proposed that the cysteine-rich protein layer may of its own be sufficient to provide structural integrity to the cell envelope, consistent with the resistance to detergent solubilization of the ‘chlamydial outer membrane complex’ under non-reducing conditions. Hence the chlamydial anomaly lingers on but on a different level, this regardless of whether or not the hypothetical chlamydial polymer contains glycan. Is there a role for a peptidoglycan/polypeptide layer in cell division? Does synthesis and/or degradation of this layer play a dynamic role in early and late developmental transitions? Does peptidoglycan play a scaffolding role in anchoring cysteine-rich outer-membrane proteins for added EB structural stability?

Chlamydia antigenic variation
In C. trachomatis, the characterization of ompA (omp1), encoding the major outer-membrane protein (MOMP), from several serovars has revealed sequence variations in four distinct segments that correspond to serotype-, serogroup-, species- and subspecies-specific epitopes (Baehr et al., 1988 ; Yuan et al., 1989 ). This variation led Stephens (1989 ) to propose a role for MOMP in C. trachomatis antigenic variation. However, immunological selection of antigenic variants has not been demonstrated and it is also possible that selective pressures linked to adaptation to varied environments are responsible for the MOMP structural variation observed in C. trachomatis. Since MOMP variable segments have been implicated in adherence (Su et al., 1990 , 1988 ), it is conceivable that sequence variation occurs in response to different receptor structures, thereby providing a basis for the observed differential tropisms of C. trachomatis serovars.

The issue of a MOMP-based mechanism of antigenic variation is further confounded by other factors. MOMP sequence variation has only been found in C. trachomatis to date, and C. psittaci and C. pneumoniae strains that have invariant MOMP sequence (Gaydos et al., 1992 ; Zhao et al., 1993 ) can indeed infect susceptible hosts at different anatomical sites, and indeed different hosts (Girjes et al., 1994 ). More interestingly, genomic sequencing has uncovered gene families encoding high molecular mass (90–180 kDa) polymorphic membrane proteins (Pmps) (also named POMPs or OMPs), some of which have been demonstrated to be exposed at the surface (Knudsen et al., 1999 ; Longbottom et al., 1998a ). Families of 9 and 21 pmp genes have been identified in C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae, respectively (Kalman et al., 1999 ; Read et al., 2000 ; Stephens et al., 1998 ), and five gene family members have been identified to date in ovine C. psittaci (Longbottom et al., 1998b ) (K. Laroucau & A. Rodolakis, personal communication). Frameshift mutations are found in some pmp genes and C. pneumoniae CWL029 pmp-6 includes a 393 bp segment, which is lost in the AR39 strain. These may represent an underlying mechanism for differential expression of Pmp proteins and/or variation of Pmp protein structure. It is also possible that the makeup of the pmp gene families currently derived from genome analysis has been altered through multiple in vitro passages of the sequenced strains. In this regard, it may become important to base our interpretation of the function of this intriguing gene family on studies involving fresh clinical isolates.

Acquisition of energy
It has long been known that a number of metabolic pathways of prokaryotes – such as protein, RNA, DNA and phospholipid syntheses – are functional in Chlamydia, reaching maximal activity halfway through infection, coincidental with maximal RB replication. Moreover, analysis of the Chlamydia genomes has revealed that it is an aerobic microbe, probably utilizing glutamate as a principal source of carbon, and perhaps also glucose and 2-oxoglutarate (Stephens et al., 1998 ). However, in view of the high number of RB proliferating in infected cells, it is reasonable to ask whether the host cell and/or chlamydiae can supply the energy metabolites required to maintain such a large bacterial population.

This issue was addressed by studying the effect of C. psittaci strain Guinea Pig Inclusion Conjunctivitis (GPIC) infection on the energy metabolism in infected cells using non-invasive NMR (Ojcius et al., 1998b ). The ATP concentration in infected cells increases significantly halfway through infection, decreasing later. Infection also stimulates glutamate synthesis with a similar time-course. The stimulation is caused by an increase in the rate of glucose consumption by the infected cell, which also results in increased lactate production and glycogen accumulation. Finally, infection increases surface expression of a glucose transporter on infected cells, which could thus lead to all the other metabolic modifications observed (Ojcius et al., 1998b ). These results may not be surprising, however, as increased host cell glucose metabolism has been reported following infection by viruses (Sorbara et al., 1996 ), and may reflect a host stress response. It is expected that infection by other intracellular microbes, including parasites, may lead to similar results.

The C. trachomatis genome contains genes that potentially encode enzymes of the glycolytic pathway, with the exception of a gene encoding fructose-1,6-diphosphate aldolase, which could be replaced by another aldolase encoded by the genome (Stephens et al., 1998 ). Assuming that these genes express functional proteins, Chlamydia could contribute to the elevated ATP concentrations observed during infection. In fact, when four of the genes encoding enzymes involved in producing energy or reducing power were expressed as recombinant proteins in E. coli, the recombinant chlamydial enzymes were active (Iliffe-Lee & McClarty, 1999 ). In addition, RT-PCR analysis demonstrated that the four genes are maximally expressed midway through the infection cycle (Iliffe-Lee & McClarty, 1999 ), consistent with the highest levels of ATP measured by NMR. The NMR method does not allow one to determine if the additional ATP is produced by chlamydiae or the host cell, but the RT-PCR results suggest that the chlamydiae are probably making at least some of the ATP. Finally, the total level of ATP in infected cells could not increase unless sufficient glucose were available, and the bacteria as well as host cells could use the additional glucose provided by the increased expression of the glucose transporter.

The genome sequences also reveal that the Krebs cycle is incomplete, as genes encoding citrate synthase, aconitase and isocitrate dehydrogenase are absent (Stephens et al., 1998 ). However, the Krebs cycle could function partially from exogenous glutamate. Genes predicted to encode glutamate transporters exist (Stephens et al., 1998 ), and the glutamate surplus during infection could be used by the bacteria to make ATP. In addition, the C. trachomatis genome contains a gene encoding a dicarboxylate translocator, which could provide the bacteria with 2-oxoglutarate. Both glutamate and 2-oxoglutarate could therefore represent a source of carbon for the partial Krebs cycle as substitutes for acetyl-CoA. Finally, C. trachomatis has homologues for all of the enzymes for the pentose phosphate pathway, except for 6-phosphogluconolactonase, which may not be an essential enzyme (McClarty, 1999 ).

The NMR studies also showed an accumulation of glycogen in host cells during infection with C. psittaci. The genome of C. trachomatis does in fact possess genes encoding enzymes of glycogen synthesis and degradation (Stephens et al., 1998 ), suggesting that glycogen degradation could provide energy to Chlamydia. However, glycogen accumulation in the inclusion has previously been observed by iodine staining of cells infected by C. trachomatis but not of those infected by C. psittaci or C. pneumoniae (Moulder, 1991 ). As previously pointed out (McClarty, 1999 ), the NMR measurements do not distinguish between extra glycogen deposited in chlamydiae, in the Chlamydia inclusion or in the host cell cytoplasm. Whilst only a C. psittaci genome sequence will reveal whether C. psittaci is in fact able to synthesize glycogen (albeit in amounts too small to detect by iodine staining), it is also likely that the host cell synthesizes larger quantities of glycogen, as previously observed for cells overexpressing glucose transporters (Buse et al., 1996 ; Ren et al., 1993 ).

Bacteria of the genus Chlamydia have been considered as energy parasites because an ATP–ADP exchange activity had been found in C. psittaci (Hatch et al., 1982 ). Genes that encode two transporters, Npt1Ct and Npt2Ct, homologous to ADP/ATP translocases of Rickettsia and mitochondria, are found in the genome (Stephens et al., 1998 ), and both transporters were active when expressed as recombinant proteins in E. coli (Tjaden et al., 1999 ). Npt1Ct catalysed ATP and ADP transport in an exchange mode, whereas Npt2Ct catalysed the net uptake of all four ribonucleoside triphosphates. The presence and expression of the genes involved in ATP biosynthesis thus suggests that chlamydiae are not strict auxotrophs for ATP, whilst the activity of Npt1Ct implies that chlamydiae may acquire at least a portion of their ATP from the host cell.


   Interaction of Chlamydia with the host cell cytosol
TOP
Overview
Background
Comparative genomics
Chlamydia structure/physiology...
Interaction of Chlamydia with...
Membrane traffic in infected...
Perspective
REFERENCES
 
To survive within eukaryotic cells, chlamydiae must confront the defence mechanisms of the host cell, and acquire metabolites necessary for bacterial growth. The chlamydial inclusion membrane (CIM), which until recently had not attracted much attention, undoubtedly plays a major role in the interactions between chlamydiae and the eukaryotic cell. The recent discoveries of genes encoding proteins present in the CIM of C. psittaci GPIC and C. trachomatis (Bannantine & Rockey, 1999 ; Rockey et al., 1995 ; Scidmore-Carlson et al., 1999 ) and genes encoding a TTS system (Hsia et al., 1997 ; Stephens et al., 1998 ) represent important developments in this field. Rockey and co-workers have isolated and characterized several RB-specific proteins, named Inc, which are associated with the CIM (Bannantine & Rockey, 1999 ; Rockey et al., 1995 ). One of these, IncA of C. psittaci GPIC, faces the cytoplasmic side of the vacuole and is phosphorylated by host cell kinases on serine and threonine residues (Rockey et al., 1997 ). IncA may therefore subvert signal transduction pathways in the host cell, to the advantage of the pathogen. A recent study has revealed that certain C. trachomatis strains that do not express an IncA homologue also produce uncharacteristic multiple inclusions in single cells (Suchland et al., 2000 ). Likewise, an IncA-specific monoclonal antibody, when micro-injected into C. trachomatis-infected cells, provokes the development of aberrant multilobed inclusions, similar to those observed in C. psittaci GPIC-infected cells (Hackstadt et al., 1999 ). These independent findings strongly suggest that one of the functions of the IncA protein is to facilitate homotypic vesicle fusion through IncA intermolecular interactions in C. trachomatis-infected cells (Hackstadt et al., 1999 ; Suchland et al., 2000 ).

The Inc proteins are secreted despite the absence of a signal sequence, and as such are candidates for secretion by the TTS pathway. This secretion system has been described in detail in bacterial pathogens of animals and plants, including Salmonella, Shigella, Pseudomonas and Yersinia (Hueck, 1998 ). Unlike other secretion systems, TTS most often depends on contact between the membranes of the infected eukaryotic cell and the pathogenic bacteria. Contact activates TTS, leading to secretion and simultaneous translocation into the host cell cytoplasm of essential virulence factors. For Chlamydia, it has been proposed that TTS activity is triggered inside the host cell, implying that effector proteins are secreted/translocated either within the inclusion lumen or through the CIM into the host cell cytosol (Hsia et al., 1997 ). Furthermore, the Chlamydia TTS apparatus may correspond physically to surface projections observed by A. Matsumoto more than twenty years ago (Bavoil & Hsia, 1998 ). These trans-membrane organelles are located to the area of contact between the bacterium and the host-derived CIM and display marked ultrastructural resemblance to TTS organelles of Salmonella (Kubori et al., 1998 ).

The often observed juxtaposition of replicating RB with the CIM suggests that growth of chlamydiae within the inclusion depends on their interaction with the CIM, and consequently on TTS activity in the area of contact. Contact-dependent RB replication may ultimately lead to physical overcrowding, provoking detachment of weakly attached chlamydiae from the CIM. Detachment from the membrane predictably would result in TTS inactivation, and may coincidentally lead to initiation of late differentiation (Hackstadt et al., 1997 ; Rockey & Matsumoto, 1999 ). It is conceivable that physical detachment of the RB and concurrent TTS inactivation/down-regulation constitute a signal for late differentiation of RB towards EB. This hypothesis conflicts with the alternative notion of a temporally regulated developmental cycle, i.e. a developmental clock, which is implied from past circular representations of the developmental cycle. Instead, Chlamydia late differentiation may be regulated by a mechanism based on a ‘developmental compass’, which, upon detachment from the CIM, switches off TTS and switches on late differentiation. Although supporting experimental evidence is fragmented at present, this mechanism is consistent with a long-observed universal phenomenon of chlamydial biology, i.e. that intracellular development within the inclusion, whilst relatively synchronous early on, becomes asynchronous at later times.

Besides a possible role during Chlamydia development, what may be the direct function(s) of TTS in virulence? This question is at the heart of Chlamydia biology and the answer will undoubtedly require the identification of type-III-secreted effector proteins. Unlike those in other pathogens, TTS genes of Chlamydia are dispersed in small clusters on the genome. In C. trachomatis serovar D, at least four unlinked loci include genes with sequence similarity to TTS genes from other bacteria (Stephens et al., 1998 ). TTS gene dispersion and the lack of high homology with other type-III-secreted effectors means that identification of the effectors by direct means will be critical to further our understanding of the role of TTS in chlamydial biology. Notwithstanding, a likely role for TTS would be in the intracellular survival of Chlamydia – in the acquisition of nutrients, for example, but especially in the resistance of the bacteria against non-specific defence mechanisms of the infected host, such as acidification of the entry vacuoles and their fusion with lysosomes. An analogy can possibly be made between chlamydial TTS and TTS encoded by Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 (SPI-2). SPI-2 is up-regulated upon internalization by macrophages (Cirillo et al., 1998 ) and SPI-2 effector proteins are known to promote intra-macrophage survival (Hensel et al., 1998 ). In this respect, it is also interesting that survival in circulating macrophages is a suspected prerequisite for disseminated C. pneumoniae infection (Gaydos et al., 1996 ). It is intuitively less attractive to envision a role for Chlamydia TTS in entry, as infectious chlamydiae are metabolically inactive. However, the possibility that surface-associated type-III-secreted effectors produced late in development may play a role in the early steps of infection can not be excluded. Indeed Matsumoto’s surface projections are found in both RB and EB, albeit in lower numbers in the latter, suggesting that ‘pre-loaded’ EB TTS complexes may be poised to unload effector proteins during the earliest steps of infection. This is consistent with a presumed role of TTS in inhibition of phagolysosome fusion (see below), which takes place earlier than transformation of the internalized EB to RB.


   Membrane traffic in infected cells
TOP
Overview
Background
Comparative genomics
Chlamydia structure/physiology...
Interaction of Chlamydia with...
Membrane traffic in infected...
Perspective
REFERENCES
 
Although the chlamydial developmental cycle was described long ago, the mechanisms of entry and survival of the pathogen inside host cells remain poorly understood. The entry route used by Chlamydia remains controversial, and evidence in favour of both endocytic and phagocytic pathways has been reported. Thus, cytochalasins, which block phagocytosis by acting at the level of the actin cytoskeleton, either inhibit Chlamydia infection or have no effect, and a component of budding, coated-pit endosomes, clathrin, either co-localizes with the entry vacuoles or is excluded. Recently, a mutant epithelial cell line deficient in clathrin-dependent endocytosis was infected efficiently with either C. psittaci GPIC or the LGV/L2 strain of C. trachomatis (Boleti et al., 1999 ), but other host cell lines and Chlamydia strains now need to be evaluated. The apparent contradictions in previous reports, extensively reviewed by Bavoil et al. (1996 ) and Hackstadt (1999 ), could be due to different host cell types and/or Chlamydia strains or growth conditions used, and suggest that both cytoskeleton-dependent phagocytosis and cytoskeleton-independent endocytosis could be used to internalize chlamydiae. Furthermore, almost all Chlamydia laboratories have studied entry in unpolarized cells, which might not reflect accurately the behaviour of the apical surface of polarized cells. When the same epithelial cells were grown as polarized cells or unpolarized cells, C. trachomatis entered the polarized cells via endocytosis more often than in the unpolarized cells (Wyrick et al., 1989 ).

Following internalization, the entry vacuoles inhibit fusion with host cell lysosomes. Undifferentiated EB may secrete via TTS a factor that inhibits the fusion, since blocking chlamydial early transcription or translation with antibiotics causes the entry vacuoles to fuse with lysosomes (Hackstadt et al., 1997 ). It has also been reported that C. psittaci entry vacuoles fuse with lysosomes of dendritic cells (Ojcius et al., 1998a ), but this may be due to the zealous proteolytic activity and rapid endosomal/phagosomal maturation in these specialized antigen-presenting cells (Banchereau & Steinman, 1998 ), which may not allow the chlamydiae sufficient time to inhibit fusion with lysosomes.

Whilst avoiding fusion with lysosomes, the entry vacuoles fuse with sphingomyelin-containing exocytic vesicles of the host cell (Hackstadt et al., 1997 ). The lipid is derived from the Golgi apparatus of the infected cell, and transfer to the growing Chlamydia vacuole begins within a few hours after infection (Hackstadt et al., 1997 ). Presumably to facilitate lipid transfer, the vacuole is also observed adjacent to the Golgi shortly after infection (Hackstadt et al., 1997 ). Besides incorporating host-cell sphingomyelins, the Chlamydia vacuole acquires glycerophospholipids from the Golgi apparatus, mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum, which are subsequently modified by the bacteria (Wylie et al., 1997 ). The chlamydiae thus manage to intercept lipid traffic from several host cell compartments, mimicking in effect the phospholipid composition of the host cell in which the bacteria are grown (Hatch & McClarty, 1998 ). These results are in line with observations that the phospholipid composition of chlamydiae is closer to that of the eukaryotic host cell than of typical prokaryotes (Newhall, 1988 ; Wylie et al., 1997 ). Elucidation of the mechanisms that divert lipids to the vacuole should therefore illuminate our understanding not only of Chlamydia infections, but also of normal membrane traffic in uninfected cells.

In addition, infection with C. trachomatis leads to phosphorylation of a number of host cell proteins within 15 min after infection (Birkelund et al., 1994 ; Fawaz et al., 1997 ). The phosphorylated proteins do not co-localize with Chlamydia vacuoles early on, but are found in the vicinity of the growing inclusion at later times. As protein phosphorylation is observed even in cells that had been pretreated with cytocholasin D to prevent Chlamydia entry (Birkelund et al., 1994 ), attachment itself may suffice to induce phosphorylation. This could conceivably occur through TTS, if one assumes that EB are TTS competent by virtue of the presence of premade TTS projections on their surface. However, heparin-coated beads, which are internalized by the same mechanism as chlamydiae, also induce phosphorylation of a similar set of host proteins (Stephens et al., 2000 ), suggesting that TTS is not required for this host cell response. Interestingly, the bead-containing vacuoles subsequently fuse with lysosomes, implying that chlamydiae must be actively involved in inhibiting fusion with lysosomes.


   Perspective
TOP
Overview
Background
Comparative genomics
Chlamydia structure/physiology...
Interaction of Chlamydia with...
Membrane traffic in infected...
Perspective
REFERENCES
 
By analogy with other bacterial pathogens, it is likely that TTS plays a central role in the biology and pathogenesis of Chlamydia. Fig. 2 summarizes several possible interactions of the nucleus, lysosomal compartment, mitochondria and Golgi apparatus with growing chlamydiae and the chlamydial inclusion. TTS function is probably required for inhibiting fusion with host cell lysosomes and for diverting lipids, while late down-regulation/inactivation of TTS activity is likely associated with RB to EB differentiation. Is TTS also involved in modulating the expression of glucose transporters? Does TTS contribute to the ability of the more virulent Chlamydia spp. to survive in macrophages? As tempting as it may be to assign manifold functions to a newly discovered system, one must bear in mind that cells infected with chlamydiae, as with other intracellular microbes, undergo a stress response, which can influence host cell metabolism. Given the limited genomic capacity of Chlamydia, the more mundane role played by the host cell in Chlamydia infection must also be addressed.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Schematic representation of the chlamydial developmental cycle and interactions of growing chlamydiae with the host cell. At early times after internalization, there is inhibition of fusion of the initial RB-containing vacuole with lysosomes. During the replication phase, expression of plasma membrane transporters is modified, and lipids, nutrients and metabolites from host cytosol and organelles are diverted to the inclusion. During late phase, there is loss of TTS-mediated contact (represented as ‘I’ at the RB surface), gradual detachment of growing chlamydiae from the inclusion membrane and coupled initiation of late differentiation into initial bodies (IB). Several of these mechanisms may result from TTS-associated activities, from the host stress response or from the interplay of both.

 
With the advent of genomics methodologies, Chlamydia research is now evolving faster than at any other time in recent memory. Although this is not unique to Chlamydia, the relative ease of genomic sequencing in this organism (because of its small genome, low G+C content and lack of repeat sequences) suggests that what we are now witnessing is likely to continue and expand. Novel hypotheses, such as those reviewed above pertaining to pathogenicity, have already been formed and are currently being tested. Yet it is safe to assume that the well of genome-derived information will eventually dry up and that ‘old-fashioned’ biology, including genetic analysis, will eventually be required. In this regard, the isolation of plasmid-free chlamydiae (Farencena et al., 1997 ; Stothard et al., 1998 ), the discovery of several Chlamydia phages (Hsia et al., 2000 ; Liu et al., 2000 ; Read et al., 2000 ; Storey et al., 1989 ), and promising transformation experiments (O’Connell & Maurelli, 1998 ) offer opportunities for the development of genetics in Chlamydia that should be acted upon as a matter of priority.


   ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of their collaborators, past and present, and wish to thank David Holden (Imperial College, University of London) for his constructive comments. We are grateful to Jonathan Eisen and Tim Read (The Institute for Genomic Research, Rockville, USA) for providing the plots shown in Fig. 1. This work was supported by grants from the US National Institute of Health (RO1 AI26280 to P.M.B. and R.-c.H., RO1 AI230440 to Dr Roger Rank, University of Arkansas, and KO4 AI01057 to P.M.B.), from the BBSRC (P10310 to P.M.B./R.-c.H.), and from the Institut Pasteur (D.M.O.).


   REFERENCES
TOP
Overview
Background
Comparative genomics
Chlamydia structure/physiology...
Interaction of Chlamydia with...
Membrane traffic in infected...
Perspective
REFERENCES
 
Baehr, W., Zhang, Y.-X., Joseph, T., Su, H., Nano, F. E., Everett, K. D. E. & Caldwell, H. D. (1988). Mapping antigenic domains expressed by Chlamydia trachomatis major outer membrane protein genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 85, 4000-4004.[Abstract]

Banchereau, J. & Steinman, R. M. (1998). Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature 392, 245-252.[Medline]

Bannantine, J. P. & Rockey, D. D. (1999). Use of primate model system to identify Chlamydia trachomatis protein antigens recognized uniquely in the context of infection. Microbiology 145, 2077-2085.[Abstract]

Barbour, A. G., Amato, K.-I., Hackstadt, T., Perry, L. & Caldwell, H. D. (1982). Chlamydia trachomatis has penicillin-binding proteins but not detectable muramic acid. J Bacteriol 151, 420-428.[Medline]

Bavoil, P. M. & Hsia, R.-c. (1998). Type III secretion in Chlamydia: a case of déjà vu? Mol Microbiol 28, 860-862.[Medline]

Bavoil, P. M., Hsia, R.-c. & Rank, R. G. (1996). Prospects for a vaccine against Chlamydia genital disease. I. Microbiology and pathogenesis. Bull Inst Pasteur 94, 5-54.

Birkelund, S., Johnsen, H. & Christiansen, G. (1994). Chlamydia trachomatis serovar L2 induces protein tyrosine phosphorylation during uptake by HeLa cells. Infect Immun 62, 4900-4908.[Abstract]

Boleti, H., Benmerah, A., Ojcius, D. M., Cerf-Bensussan, N. & Dautry-Varsat, A. (1999). Chlamydia infection of epithelial cells expressing dynamin and Eps15 mutants: clathrin-independent entry into cells and dynamin-dependent productive growth. J Cell Sci 112, 1487-1496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Burland, V., Shao, Y., Perna, N. T., Plunkett, G., Sofia, H. J. & Blattner, F. R. (1998). The complete DNA sequence and analysis of the large virulence plasmid of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Nucleic Acids Res 26, 4196-4204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Buse, M. G., Robinson, K. A., Marshall, B. A. & Mueckler, M. (1996). Differential effects of GLUT1 or GLUT4 overexpression on hexosamine biosynthesis by muscles of transgenic mice. J Biol Chem 271, 23197-23202.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chopra, I., Storey, C., Falla, T. J. & Pearce, J. H. (1998). Antibiotics, peptidoglycan synthesis and genomics: the chlamydial anomaly revisited. Microbiology 144, 2673-2678.[Free Full Text]

Cirillo, D. M., Valdivia, R. H., Monack, D. M. & Falkow, S. (1998). Macrophage-dependent induction of the Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 type III secretion system and its role in intracellular survival. Mol Microbiol 30, 175-188.[Medline]

von Eichel-Streiber, C., Boquet, P., Sauerborn, M. & Thelestam, M. (1996). Large clostridial cytotoxins – a family of glycosyltransferases modifying small GTP-binding proteins. Trends Microbiol 4, 375-382.[Medline]

Farencena, A., Comanducci, M., Donati, M., Ratti, G. & Cevenini, R. (1997). Characterization of a new isolate of Chlamydia trachomatis which lacks the common plasmid and has properties of biovar trachoma. Infect Immun 65, 2965-2969.[Abstract]

Fawaz, F. S., van Ooij, C., Homola, E., Mutka, S. C. & Engel, J. N. (1997). Infection with Chlamydia trachomatis alters the tyrosine phosphorylation and/or localization of several host cell proteins including cortactin. Infect Immun 65, 5301-5308.[Abstract]

Gaydos, C. A., Quinn, T. C., Bobo, L. D. & Eiden, J. J. (1992). Similarity of Chlamydia pneumoniae strains in the variable domain IV region of the major outer membrane protein gene. Infect Immun 60, 5319-5323.[Abstract]

Gaydos, C. A., Summersgill, J. T., Sahney, N. N., Ramirez, J. A. & Quinn, T. C. (1996). Replication of Chlamydia pneumoniae in vitro in human macrophages, endothelial cells, and aortic artery smooth muscle cells. Infect Immun 64, 1614-1620.[Abstract]

Gerbase, A. C., Rowley, J. T. & Mertens, T. E. (1998). Global epidemiology of sexually transmitted diseases. Lancet 351, 2-4.[Medline]

Ghuysen, J. M. & Goffin, C. (1999). Lack of cell wall peptidoglycan versus penicillin sensitivity: new insights into the chlamydial anomaly. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43, 2339-2344.[Free Full Text]

Girjes, A. A., Carrick, F. N. & Lavin, M. F. (1994). Remarkable sequence relatedness in the DNA encoding the major outer membrane protein of Chlamydia psittaci (koala type I) and Chlamydia pneumoniae. Gene 138, 139-142.[Medline]

Grayston, J. T. (1999). Does Chlamydia pneumoniae cause atherosclerosis? Arch Surg 134, 930-934.[Free Full Text]

Hackstadt, T. (1999). Cell biology. In Chlamydia: Intracellular Biology, Pathogenesis, and Immunity, pp. 101-138. Edited by R. S. Stephens. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.

Hackstadt, T., Fischer, E. R., Scidmore, M. A., Rockey, D. D. & Heinzen, R. A. (1997). Origins and functions of the chlamydial inclusion. Trends Microbiol 5, 288-293.[Medline]

Hackstadt, T., Scidmore-Carlson, M. A., Shaw, E. I. & Fischer, E. R. (1999). The Chlamydia trachomatis IncA protein is required for homotypic vesicle fusion. Cell Microbiol 1, 119-130.[Medline]

Hatch, G. M. & McClarty, G. (1998). Phospholipid composition of purified Chlamydia trachomatis mimics that of the eucaryotic host cell. Infect Immun 66, 3727-3735.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hatch, T. P. (1996). Disulfide cross-linked envelope proteins: the functional equivalent of peptidoglycan in chlamydiae? J Bacteriol 178, 1-5.[Free Full Text]

Hatch, T. P., Al-Hossainy, E. & Silverman, J. A. (1982). Adenine nucleotide and lysine transport in Chlamydia psittaci. J Bacteriol 150, 662.[Medline]

Hensel, M., Shea, J. E., Waterman, S. R. & 7 other authors (1998). Genes encoding putative effector proteins of the type III secretion system of Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 are required for bacterial virulence and proliferation in macrophages. Mol Microbiol 30, 163–174.[Medline]

Hsia, R.-c., Pannekoek, Y., Ingerowski, E. & Bavoil, P. M. (1997). Type III secretion genes identify a putative virulence locus of Chlamydia. Mol Microbiol 25, 351-359.[Medline]

Hsia, R.-c., Ting, L.-M. & Bavoil, P. M. (2000). Microvirus of Chlamydia psittaci strain Guinea Pig Inclusion Conjunctivitis: isolation and molecular characterization. Microbiology 146, 1651-1660.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hueck, C. J. (1998). Type III protein secretion systems in bacterial pathogens of animals and plants. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62, 379-433.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Iliffe-Lee, E. R. & McClarty, G. (1999). Glucose metabolism in Chlamydia trachomatis: the ‘energy parasite’ hypothesis revisited. Mol Microbiol 33, 177-187.[Medline]

Kalman, S., Mitchell, W., Marathe, R. & 7 other authors (1999). Comparative genomes of Chlamydia pneumoniae and C. trachomatis. Nature Genet 21, 385–389.[Medline]

Knudsen, K., Madsen, A. S., Mygind, P., Christiansen, G. & Birkelund, S. (1999). Identification of two novel genes encoding 97- to 99-kilodalton outer membrane proteins of Chlamydia pneumoniae. Infect Immun 67, 375-383.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kubori, T., Matsushima, Y., Nakamura, D., Uralil, J., Lara-Tejero, M., Sukhan, A., Galan, J. E. & Aizawa, S. I. (1998). Supramolecular structure of the Salmonella typhimurium type III protein secretion system. Science 280, 602-605.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Liu, B. L., Everson, J. S., Fane, B., Giannikopoulou, P., Vretou, E., Lambden, P. R. & Clarke, I. N. (2000). Molecular characterization of a bacteriophage (Chp2) from Chlamydia psittaci. J Virol 74, 3464-3469.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Longbottom, D., Findlay, J., Vretou, E. & Dunbar, S. M. (1998a). Immunoelectron microscopic localisation of the OMP90 family on the outer membrane surface of Chlamydia psittaci. FEMS Microbiol Lett 164, 111-117.[Medline]

Longbottom, D., Russell, M., Dunbar, S. M., Jones, G. E. & Herring, A. J. (1998b). Molecular cloning and characterization of the genes coding for the highly immunogenic cluster of 90-kilodalton envelope proteins from the Chlamydia psittaci subtype that causes abortion in sheep. Infect Immun 66, 1317-1324.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

McClarty, G. (1999). Chlamydial metabolism as inferred from the complete genome sequence. In Chlamydia: Intracellular Biology, Pathogenesis, and Immunity, pp. 69-100. Edited by R. S. Stephens. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.

Makarova, K. S., Aravind, L. & Koonin, E. V. (2000). A novel superfamily of predicted cysteine proteases from eukaryotes, viruses and Chlamydia pneumoniae. Trends Biochem Sci 25, 50-52.[Medline]

Makino, K., Ishii, K., Yasunaga, T. & 14 other authors (1998). Complete nucleotide sequences of 93-kb and 3·3-kb plasmids of an enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 derived from Sakai outbreak. DNA Res 5, 1–9.[Medline]

Moulder, J. W. (1991). Interaction of chlamydiae and host cells in vitro. Microbiol Rev 55, 143-190.

Moulder, J. W. (1993). Why is Chlamydia sensitive to penicillin in the absence of peptidoglycan? Infect Agents Dis 2, 87-99.[Medline]

Newhall, W. J. (1988). Macromolecular and antigenic composition of chlamydiae. In Microbiology of Chlamydia, pp. 47-70. Edited by A. L. Barron. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Nigg, C. & Eaton, M. D. (1944). Isolation from normal mice of a pneumotropic virus which forms elementary bodies. J Exp Med 79, 497-510.

O’Connell, C. M. C. & Maurelli, A. T. (1998). Introduction of foreign DNA into Chlamydia and stable expression of chloramphenicol resistance. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Human Chlamydial Infection, pp. 519-522. Edited by R. Stephens, G. Byrne, G. Christiansen, I. Clarke, J. Grayston, R. Rank, G. Ridgway, P. Saikku, J. Schachter & W. Stamm. San Francisco, CA: International Chlamydia Symposium.

Ojcius, D. M., Bravo de Alba, Y., Kanellopoulos, J. M., Hawkins, R. A., Kelly, K. A., Rank, R. G. & Dautry-Varsat, A. (1998a). Internalization of Chlamydia by dendritic cells and stimulation of Chlamydia-specific T cells. J Immunol 160, 1297-1303.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ojcius, D. M., Degani, H., Mispelter, J. & Dautry-Varsat, A. (1998b). Enhancement of ATP levels and glucose metabolism during an infection by Chlamydia. NMR studies of living cells. J Biol Chem 273, 7052-7058.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Read, T. D., Brunham, R. C., Shen, C. & 22 other authors (2000). Genome sequences of Chlamydia trachomatis MoPn and Chlamydia pneumoniae AR39. Nucleic Acids Res 28, 1397–1406.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ren, J. M., Marshall, B. A., Gulve, E. A., Gao, J., Johnson, D. W., Holloszy, J. O. & Mueckler, M. (1993). Evidence from transgenic mice that glucose transport is rate-limiting for glycogen deposition and glycolysis in skeletal muscle. J Biol Chem 268, 16113-16115.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rockey, D. D. & Matsumoto, A. (1999). The chlamydial developmental cycle. In Prokaryotic Development, pp. 403-425. Edited by Y. V. Brun & L. J. Shimkets. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.

Rockey, D. D., Heinzen, R. A. & Hackstadt, T. (1995). Cloning and characterization of a Chlamydia psittaci gene coding for a protein localized in the inclusion membrane of infected cells. Mol Microbiol 15, 617-626.[Medline]

Rockey, D. D., Grosenbach, D., Hruby, D. E., Peacock, M. G., Heinzen, R. A. & Hackstadt, T. (1997). Chlamydia psittaci IncA is phosphorylated by the host cell and is exposed on the cytoplasmic face of the developing inclusion. Mol Microbiol 24, 217-228.[Medline]

Scidmore-Carlson, M. A., Shaw, E. I., Dooley, C. A., Fischer, E. R. & Hackstadt, T. (1999). Identification and characterization of a Chlamydia trachomatis early operon encoding four novel inclusion membrane proteins. Mol Microbiol 33, 753-765.[Medline]

Sorbara, L. R., Maldarelli, F., Chamoun, G., Schilling, B., Chokekijcahi, S., Staudt, L., Mitsuya, H., Simpson, I. A. & Zeichner, S. L. (1996). Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection of H9 cells induces increased glucose transporter expression. J Virol 70, 7275-7279.[Abstract]

Stephens, R. S. (1989). Antigenic variation of Chlamydia trachomatis. In Intracellular Parasitism, pp. 51-62. Edited by J. W. Moulder. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Stephens, R. S., Kalman, S., Lammel, C. & 9 other authors (1998). Genome sequence of an obligate intracellular pathogen of humans: Chlamydia trachomatis. Science 282, 754–759.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stephens, R. S., Fawaz, F. S., Kennedy, K. A., Koshiyama, K., Nichols, B., van Ooij, C. & Engel, J. N. (2000). Eukaryotic cell uptake of heparin-coated microspheres: a model of host cell invasion by Chlamydia trachomatis. Infect Immun 68, 1080-1085.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Storey, C. C., Lusher, M. & Richmond, S. J. (1989). Analysis of the complete nucleotide sequence of Chp1, a phage which infects avian Chlamydia psittaci. J Gen Virol 70, 3381-3390.[Abstract]

Stothard, D. R., Williams, J. A., Van der Pol, B. & Jones, R. B. (1998). Identification of a Chlamydia trachomatis serovar E urogenital isolate which lacks the cryptic plasmid. Infect Immun 66, 6010-6013.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Su, H., Zhang, Y. X. & Li, R. (1985). Presence of muramic acid in Chlamydia trachomatis proved by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Kexue Tongbao 30, 695-699.

Su, H., Zhang, Y.-X., Barrera, O., Watkins, N. G. & Caldwell, H. D. (1988). Differential effect of trypsin on infectivity of Chlamydia trachomatis: loss of infectivity requires cleavage of major outer membrane protein variable domains II and IV. Infect Immun 56, 2094-2100.[Medline]

Su, H., Watkins, N. G., Zhang, Y.-X. & Caldwell, H. D. (1990). Chlamydia trachomatis–host cell interactions: role of the chlamydial major outer membrane protein as an adhesin. Infect Immun 58, 1017-1025.[Medline]

Suchland, R. J., Rockey, D. D., Bannantine, J. P. & Stamm, W. E. (2000). Isolates of Chlamydia trachomatis that occupy nonfusogenic inclusions lack IncA, a protein localized to the inclusion membrane. Infect Immun 68, 360-367.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Thylefors, B., Negrel, A. D., Pararajasegaram, R. & Dadzie, K. Y. (1995). Global data on blindness. Bull WHO 73, 115-121.[Medline]

Tjaden, J., Winkler, H. H., Schwoppe, C., Van Der Laan, M., Mohlmann, T. & Neuhaus, H. E. (1999). Two nucleotide transport proteins in Chlamydia trachomatis, one for net nucleoside triphosphate uptake and the other for transport of energy. J Bacteriol 181, 1196-1202.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wylie, J. L., Hatch, G. M. & McClarty, G. (1997). Host cell phospholipids are trafficked to and then modified by Chlamydia trachomatis. J Bacteriol 179, 7233-7242.[Abstract]

Wyrick, P. B., Choong, J., Davis, C. H., Knight, S. T., Royal, M. O., Maslow, A. S. & Bagnell, C. R. (1989). Entry of genital Chlamydia trachomatis into polarized human epithelial cells. Infect Immun 57, 2378-2389.[Medline]

Yuan, Y., Zhang, Y.-X., Watkins, N. G. & Caldwell, H. D. (1989). Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences for the four variable domains of the major outer membrane proteins of the 15 Chlamydia trachomatis serovars. Infect Immun 57, 1040-1049.[Medline]

Zhao, Q., Schachter, J. & Stephens, R. S. (1993). Lack of allelic polymorphism for the major outer membrane protein gene of the agent of guinea pig inclusion conjunctivitis (Chlamydia psittaci). Infect Immun 61, 3078-3080.[Abstract]

Zomorodipour, A. & Andersson, S. G. (1999). Obligate intracellular parasites: Rickettsia prowazekii and Chlamydia trachomatis. FEBS Lett 452, 11-15.[Medline]