Carbon-source-dependent nitrogen regulation in Escherichia coli is mediated through glutamine-dependent GlnB signalling

Mani Maheswaran and Karl Forchhammer

Institut für Mikrobiologie und Molekularbiologie der Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, D-35392 Giessen, Germany

Correspondence
Karl Forchhammer
Karl.Forchhammer{at}mikro.bio.uni-giessen.de


   ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
The PII signal transduction proteins GlnB and GlnK are uridylylated/deuridylylated in response to the intracellular glutamine level, the primary signal of the cellular nitrogen status. Furthermore, GlnB was shown to be allosterically regulated by 2-oxoglutarate, and thus GlnB was suggested to integrate signals of the cellular carbon and nitrogen status. Receptors of GlnB signal transduction in Escherichia coli are the NtrB/NtrC two-component system and GlnE, an enzyme which adenylylates/deadenylylates glutamine synthetase. In this study, the authors investigated the effect of different carbon sources on the expression of the NtrC-dependent genes glnA and glnK and on the uridylylation status of GlnB and GlnK. With glutamine as nitrogen source, high levels of glnA and glnK expression were obtained when glucose was used as carbon source, but expression was strongly decreased when the cells were grown with poor carbon sources or when cAMP was present. This response correlated with the uridylylation status of GlnB, suggesting that the carbon/cAMP effect was mediated through GlnB uridylylation, a conclusion that was confirmed by mutants of the PII signalling pathway. When glutamine was replaced by low concentrations of ammonium as nitrogen source, neither glnAglnK expression nor GlnB uridylylation responded to the carbon source or to cAMP. Furthermore, glutamine synthetase could be rapidly adenylylated in vivo by the external addition of glutamine; however, this occurred only when cells were grown in the presence of cAMP, not in its absence. Together, these results suggest that poor carbon sources, through cAMP signalling, favour glutamine uptake. The cellular glutamine signal is then transduced by uridylyltransferase and GlnB to modulate NtrC-dependent gene expression.


Abbreviations: GS, glutamine synthetase; UTase/UR, uridylyltransferase/uridylylremovase


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Assimilation of ammonia and acquisition of various nitrogen sources is tightly controlled in most bacteria. A prerequisite for efficient nitrogen control is the constant monitoring of the intracellular nitrogen status. Information on the cellular nitrogen status is integrated and transduced by a signalling protein termed PII. PII proteins constitute a highly conserved family of signal transduction proteins, which are found in all three domains of life (reviewed by Arcondeguy et al., 2001). Escherichia coli possesses two closely related PII paralogues, GlnB and GlnK. GlnB is produced constitutively and it regulates the NtrB/NtrC two-component system (for a review, see Ninfa & Atkinson, 2000). NtrC is a key transcriptional activator of various nitrogen-controlled genes, among them glnA, encoding glutamine synthetase (GS) (reviewed by Magasanik, 1996), and glnK, encoding the second PII paralogue (van Heeswijk et al., 1996). Furthermore, GlnB controls the activity of GS by adenylylation/deadenylylation through a bifunctional enzyme (ATase), the product of the glnE gene (Shapiro & Stadtman 1968; Stadtman, 1990; Jaggi et al., 1997). GlnK accumulates in nitrogen-limited cells to high levels, and contributes to the regulation of NtrC-dependent genes other than glnA under conditions of severe nitrogen limitation (Atkinson et al., 2002b; Blauwkamp & Ninfa, 2002a). Cells lacking GlnK are highly impaired in surviving periods of nitrogen depletion (Blauwkamp & Ninfa, 2002b).

Both PII proteins are covalently modified by uridylylation at a conserved tyrosyl residue (Tyr-51) (Son & Rhee, 1987) that is located at the tip of a solvent-exposed loop (T-loop) (Jaggi et al., 1996). Uridylylation and deuridylylation are catalysed by a bifunctional uridylyltransferase/uridylylremovase enzyme (UTase/UR), the glnD product, which responds to the cellular glutamine level (Adler et al., 1975). In the presence of high intracellular glutamine levels, signalling nitrogen-excess conditions, uridylylremovase activity of GlnD dominates, causing demodification of uridylylated PII proteins. Low glutamine levels, signalling nitrogen deficiency, promote the uridylyltransferase activity, leading to uridylylation of PII (Jiang et al., 1998a).

The interaction of the PII proteins with signal receptors is modulated by uridylylation of the T-loop. One receptor of PII signalling is the adenylyltransferase/removase enzyme GlnE (ATase), which regulates the activity of GS by reversible adenylylation. The default mode of ATase, which is stimulated by glutamine and by non-uridylylated PII, is adenylylation of GS. Upon uridylylation of PII, a different complex is formed, which switches the activity of ATase towards deadenylylation and thereby activation of GS (Rhee et al., 1985; Jiang et al., 1998c; Jaggi et al., 1997). Non-modified GlnB forms a complex with NtrB, which dephosphorylates the response regulator NtrC, thus switching off transcription of glnA (Jiang & Ninfa, 1999; Pioszak et al., 2000) and of other NtrC-dependent genes like glnK (Atkinson et al., 2002a). By contrast, GlnB-UMP is not able to form a complex with NtrB. In this state, the histidine kinase activity of NtrB dominates, and by phosphoryl transfer, NtrC is phosphorylated and is now transcriptionally active (Jiang & Ninfa, 1999). In addition to uridylylation, GlnB is regulated allosterically by the effector molecule 2-oxoglutarate as shown by Ninfa and colleagues in a series of in vitro analyses (Jiang et al., 1998a, b, c). Of the three binding sites for 2-oxoglutarate within the trimeric GlnB protein, only one site is occupied with high affinity, whereas affinity of the second and third sites is decreased by negative cooperativity. Only at high 2-oxoglutarate concentrations does complete occupation of GlnB with this effector molecule occur. This state impairs complex formation of non-uridylylated GlnB with NtrB, which finally results in phosphorylation and, thus, activation of NtrC (Jiang & Ninfa, 1999). From these biochemical properties, it was proposed that GlnB integrates signals of the nitrogen status (by uridylylation) with a signal of central carbon metabolism (2-oxoglutarate) to co-ordinate the expression of key enzymes of nitrogen assimilation in response to the nitrogen and carbon state. However, transduction of carbon signals by PII proteins in E. coli has not yet been demonstrated in vivo.

Another link between carbon and nitrogen regulation has been demonstrated for the regulation of expression of the glnALG operon. Its transcription is initiated from tandem promoters (glnAp1 and glnAp2), which are under carbon and nitrogen control (reviewed by Reitzer, 1996, and by Magasanik, 1996). The activity of the weak, {sigma}70-dependent glnAp1 promoter requires binding of the CRP–cAMP complex to an upstream activating sequence. The CRP–cAMP complex is formed when cells are grown with a carbon source that is not transported by the phosphotransferase system (PTS). The utilization of PTS sugars like glucose leads to a decrease in cellular cAMP levels and dissociation of the complex, thereby causing catabolite repression of a large number of genes (reviewed by Saier et al., 1996). Located 116 bp downstream of glnAp1 is a strong {sigma}54-dependent promoter, glnAp2, which is activated by NtrC-phosphate. Concomitant with the activation of glnAp2, NtrC-phosphate blocks transcription from the weak glnAp1 promoter. Thus, when NtrC-phosphate accumulates during nitrogen-limited growth, the glnALG operon is almost exclusively transcribed to high levels from glnAp2 (Magasanik, 1996). A recent investigation showed that transcription from glnAp2 also responds to catabolite repression. Elevated levels of cAMP, through formation of the CRP–cAMP complex, caused a 21-fold downregulation of transcription from glnAp2 (Tian et al., 2001). However, the mechanism by which the CRP–cAMP complex affects transcription from glnAp2 remains unclear.

To elucidate the mechanism whereby carbon signals affect NtrC-dependent gene expression, we studied the in vivo response of the PII signalling system to different carbon sources. Expression of the NtrC-dependent genes glnA and glnK was monitored and compared to the uridylylation status of the PII proteins. All responses of glnA and glnK expression to carbon or cAMP signals were in accord with alterations in the uridylylation status of the PII proteins. We conclude that the effect of carbon source on NtrC-dependent gene expression is mediated through cAMP-dependent glutamine uptake, thereby affecting the glutamine-sensitive UTase–PII signalling system.


   METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Bacterial strains and growth conditions.
The bacterial strains used in this work are shown in Table 1. The minimal medium used in this study was based on M9 minimal medium (Sambrook et al., 1989) with the following modifications. The medium was supplemented with 1 mM MgSO4, 0·1 mM CaCl2, 0·04 % (w/v) thiamin and 0·1 % (v/v) of the A5 + Co trace elements mixture (Rippka 1988), and instead of 93 mM NH4Cl, either 14 mM glutamine or 2 mM NH4Cl was used as a poor nitrogen source, as indicated. The carbon sources (glucose, glycerol, xylose, galactose or succinate) were used at 0·4 % (w/v) final concentration. Cells were grown routinely at 37 °C under aerobic conditions. The growth of the cells was measured spectrophotometrically by following the optical density of the culture (OD600). The cultures that were used for measurements were initiated by diluting a cell suspension from an overnight-grown culture in the appropriate medium to an initial OD600 of 0·04–0·05. When the day-culture reached an OD600 between 0·40 and 0·45, 2 ml aliquots were removed to reaction tubes and the cells were rapidly chilled in liquid nitrogen for 5 s. The chilled, but not frozen, cell suspension was immediately centrifuged at 4 °C and the cell pellet was quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -70 °C until its use for various assays.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Strains of E. coli used in this study

 
Glutamine synthetase (GS) assays.
Frozen cells were thawed and resuspended in wash solution containing 1 % (w/v) KCl and 0·1 mg ml-1 CTAB (N-cetyl-N,N,N-trimethylammonium bromide) and were incubated in this buffer for 3 min on ice to permeabilize the membranes. Then the cells were centrifuged and resuspended in reaction buffer without Mg2+ ions, and the {gamma}-glutamyl transferase activity of glutamine synthetase (GSt activity) was determined as described by Pahel et al. (1982). GSt specific activity is given in nmol {gamma}-glutamylhydroxamate formed min-1 (mg protein)-1. The adenylylation status of GS was estimated by measuring the GSt activity in the presence or absence of 67 mM MgCl2 (Stadtman et al., 1979). The cell suspension in magnesium-free reaction mixture was divided into two parts, one of which was supplemented with 67 mM MgCl2; GSt activity was determined in the two parallel samples. The mean number of adenylylated subunits of GS was calculated from the quotient (Q) of GSt activity in the presence or absence of MgCl2 in the assay, according to the following equation: n (number of adenylylated subunits of GS)=(1-Q)x12.

Determination of the modification status of GlnB and GlnK.
The modification status of the PII proteins GlnB and GlnK was determined by non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Forchhammer et al., 1999) followed by immunodetection of the PII proteins using appropriate antibodies. The frozen cells (see above) were thawed and lysed in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris/HCl pH 7·4, 4 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 0·5 mM benzamidine and 0·5 mM PMSF by grinding the cells with glass beads (0·11 mm; Sigma-Aldrich) in a Hybaid Ribolyser (Hybaid). Cell debris and glass beads were removed by centrifugation and the protein concentration in the supernatant was estimated according to the method of Bradford (1976). A total of 2·5 µg protein was loaded per lane for non-denaturing PAGE. Following electrophoresis, the proteins were blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes (BioTrace NT, Pall Corporation) and the blots were probed with specific anti-GlnB (see below) or anti-GlnK antibodies (Forchhammer et al., 1999), which were subsequently visualized using peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich) and a chemoluminescent substrate (Roche Diagnostics). GlnB-specific antibodies were raised in rabbits (Pineda Antibody Service, Berlin, Germany) against purified native GlnB protein that was produced in E. coli cells of strain HS10 overexpressing the glnB gene from plasmid pMP2 (Forchhammer et al., 1999). The GlnB protein was purified essentially as described for the purification of GlnK (Forchhammer et al., 1999). At a dilution of 1 : 50 000 (final concentration), the anti-GlnB serum did not show any cross-reactivity against GlnK, and, vice versa, at a dilution of 1 : 10 000, the anti-GlnK serum did not cross-react with GlnB under our assay conditions.


   RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
The expression of nitrogen-regulated genes is affected by the carbon source
To investigate the effect of different carbon sources on the PII signal transduction system in E. coli, wild-type cells were grown in minimal medium supplemented with various carbon sources using glutamine as nitrogen source. Minimal medium with glutamine as sole nitrogen source is commonly referred to as a ‘nitrogen-limiting’ condition, and was shown to lead to the activation of NtrC-dependent gene expression (Bueno et al., 1985; Atkinson & Ninfa, 1998). Cells from the mid-exponential phase of growth were harvested and transferase activity of GS (GSt) was determined as a measure of GS quantity, and thus of glnA expression (Table 2). Furthermore, protein extracts were analysed by immunoblotting of non-denaturing gels to determine the abundance and modification state of the PII proteins GlnB and GlnK, using GlnB- or GlnK-specific antibodies (Fig. 1). A high level of GSt activity was measured in glucose+glutamine-grown cultures, as expected. Xylose as carbon source also supported high GSt activities. However, in the presence of the other carbon sources, GSt levels were significantly lower. With glycerol, galactose or succinate as carbon source, GSt activities were even lower than under conditions of excess ammonium supply (glucose with 37 mM ammonium chloride). Immunoblot analysis of non-denaturing gels using GlnK-specific antibodies showed that GlnK was undetectable in cells that were grown with those carbon sources, which also repressed glnA expression (Fig. 1B). Only in glucose- or xylose-grown cells was GlnK produced in detectable amounts. Under those conditions, GlnK was almost completely present in the fully uridylylated state, as revealed by comparing the mobility of GlnK to that of cells exposed to ammonium in order to deuridylylate GlnK (Fig. 1B, lane C). As expected, GlnB, whose synthesis is not subject to nitrogen control (Liu & Magasanik, 1993), could be detected under all growth conditions. The uridylylation status of GlnB correlated with the levels of GSt activity and GlnK accumulation: in the presence of glucose or xylose, GlnB was highly uridylylated, whereas in the presence of glycerol, galactose or succinate its degree of uridylylation was much lower (Fig. 1A).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Effect of different carbon sources on the expression of GS in E. coli YMC10 compared to the expression in ammonium-excess conditions

Cells were grown in minimal salt medium as described in Methods, and GSt activity [nmol {gamma}-glutamylhydroxamate formed min-1 (mg protein)-1] was determined from cells in the mid-exponential phase of growth. Mean values and standard deviations from three independent experiments are shown.

 


View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Analysis of the carbon-source-dependent uridylylation status of GlnB and GlnK. E. coli wild-type cells were grown with glutamine as sole nitrogen source in the presence of the following carbon sources: glucose (Glc), glycerol (Gly), galactose (Gal) succinate (Suc) and xylose (Xyl). Cell-free extracts were subjected to non-denaturing PAGE and the mobility of the PII paralogues was analysed by immunoblotting (see Methods). (A) Immunodetection with GlnB-specific antibodies. (B) Immunodetection with GlnK-specific antibodies. The position of the four possible forms of the PII proteins is indicated; the superscript numbers denote the number of uridylylated subunits per trimeric PII protein (Forchhammer et al., 1999). Lane C: control to reveal the modification state of GlnK. For this purpose, an extract was prepared from glucose+glutamine-grown cells, which were challenged with 0·2 % ammonium chloride for 2 min to promote GlnK deuridylylation.

 
The carbon source effect on NtrC-dependent gene expression is mediated by cAMP and by the GlnB signal transduction system
The above preliminary experiment suggested that the PII signal transduction system perceives a signal from the carbon source of the cells and thereby affects expression of the NtrC-dependent genes glnA and glnK. Recently, downregulation of glnA expression by the CRP–cAMP complex was reported in E. coli (Tian et al., 2001); however, the mechanism of this effect remained elusive. To investigate whether the effect of carbon source observed on the PII signal transduction system was related to the cAMP effect reported by Tian et al. (2001), we studied the expression of glnA in various mutants of the PII signalling system, in the presence and absence of 2 mM cAMP. Cells of the wild-type and of glnB, glnD and glnK mutants were grown in minimal medium with glutamine as sole nitrogen source and with either glucose or glycerol as carbon source, thus leading to high or low levels of NtrC activation as deduced from the previous experiment. As above, GSt activity was determined (Table 3) and the quantity and modification status of the GlnB and GlnK proteins were analysed by immunoblotting (Fig. 2). Consistent with the report by Tian et al. (2001), addition of cAMP to glucose+glutamine-grown cells led to a strong decrease of GSt activity, reaching a level that was similar to that of glycerol-supplemented cells. No further reduction of GS levels was obtained when cAMP was added to glycerol-supplemented cultures. These results are consistent with the report by Tian et al. (2001), which showed that the carbon effect on glnA expression is mediated through the signalling molecule of the carbon source, cAMP. These authors suggested that the CRP–cAMP complex negatively affects transcription from the NtrC-dependent glnAp2 promoter. As shown in Table 3, no carbon effect on GSt levels could be detected in a GlnB-deficient mutant and only a slight reduction was determined from cAMP-treated cells. In contrast to GlnB, the GlnK protein seems to play no major role in the transmission of carbon/cAMP signals: in a GlnK-deficient mutant, low GSt levels were obtained in glycerol-grown cells as well as in cAMP-supplemented cultures, as in the wild-type. In a GlnD-deficient mutant, which is unable to uridylylate the PII proteins, the GSt levels remained low, as compared to the other strains.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Effect of cAMP and glycerol on the expression of GS in E. coli wild-type and glnB, glnD and glnK mutants

GSt activity was determined as described in Table 2.

 


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Effect of glucose, glycerol and cAMP on the uridylylation status of GlnB and GlnK in E. coli wild-type cells and in various mutants of the PII signalling system in the presence of glutamine. E. coli wild-type (WT), glnD (D), glnB (B) and glnK (K) mutants were grown with glutamine as sole nitrogen source and glucose (Glc) or glycerol (Gly) as carbon source, in the presence or absence of 2 mM cAMP, as indicated. The uridylylation status was analysed as described in Fig. 1. (A) Immunodetection with GlnB-specific antibodies. (B) Immunodetection with GlnK-specific antibodies. The control lane (C), showing partially de-uridylylated forms of GlnK, was prepared with the same extract as in Fig. 1(B), lane C.

 
The uridylylation status of GlnB (Fig. 2A) correlated with GSt activity; cAMP and glycerol caused deuridylylation of GlnB in the wild-type and in the GlnK-deficient strain HS10. Whether the residual uridylylation of GlnB in HS10 as compared to wild-type is of significance remains to be elucidated. As expected, GlnB was not uridylylated in the glnD mutant. Together, these results confirmed the preliminary conclusion that the carbon effect on glnA expression is mediated through GlnB uridylylation.

Accumulation of the GlnK protein (Fig. 2B) showed a similar pattern as observed with GSt activity in wild-type cells: glycerol as carbon source or the presence of cAMP repressed GlnK accumulation. In contrast to the constitutive high GSt activities in the glnB mutant, synthesis of GlnK was still repressed by cAMP or glycerol in this mutant. This might suggest that the GlnK protein, in the absence of GlnB, is sufficient to regulate its own synthesis although it is unable to regulate glnA expression properly. This conclusion is in accord with recent studies by Atkinson et al. (2002a), where they showed that the expression of glnK requires higher levels of activated NtrC than that of glnA. Therefore, a partial inhibition of NtrC activity by GlnK might be sufficient to decrease glnK expression although it might be insufficient to affect glnA expression. As expected, glnK was not expressed in the glnD mutant, in which GlnB is permanently unmodified.

The carbon/cAMP effect on GlnB signal transduction depends on extracellular glutamine
The above experiment showed that uridylylation of the GlnB signalling protein responds to the carbon source or to the cAMP levels and it strongly suggested that the GlnB signalling protein is required to transmit the carbon/cAMP signal towards NtrC-dependent gene expression. These conclusions imply that the signal of the carbon source is perceived through the GlnD enzyme (UTase/UR), which is known to respond to the cellular glutamine levels. Therefore, we speculated whether the observed carbon/cAMP effects might result from different permeability of the cells to the exogenous nitrogen source glutamine when growing with different carbon sources or in the presence of cAMP. To examine this possibility, the nitrogen source glutamine was replaced by limiting amounts of ammonium, which were adjusted such that they caused nitrogen-poor conditions. Preliminary experiments revealed that addition of 2 mM ammonium chloride led to derepression of glnA expression in glucose-supplemented minimal medium when cells were harvested at the mid-exponential phase of growth (OD600 approx. 0·4), which is also in accord with the results from Atkinson et al. (2002a). Under those conditions, using either glucose or glycerol as carbon source, the four strains (wild-type, glnB, glnD and glnK mutants) were grown in the presence or absence of 2 mM cAMP. From cells harvested at the mid-exponential phase of growth, GSt activity was determined (Table 4) and the GlnB and GlnK proteins were analysed as above (Fig. 3). Clearly, GSt activity in wild-type cells was not decreased by the addition of cAMP and was only slightly affected by the presence of glycerol. Similarly, the glnK mutant, which displayed a strong response to cAMP and to the carbon source in the presence of glutamine, no longer responded to the addition of cAMP. Its GSt activity in the presence of glucose was twofold elevated compared to the wild-type and was similar to the wild-type in the presence of glycerol, regardless of the presence of exogenous cAMP. The glnB mutant again exhibited constitutively high GSt activity and the glnD mutant showed low levels of GSt activity.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Effect of cAMP and glycerol on the expression of GS in E. coli wild-type and glnB, glnD and glnK mutants in the presence of limiting amounts of ammonium as nitrogen source

GSt activity was determined as described in Table 2.

 


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Effect of glucose, glycerol and cAMP on the uridylylation status of GlnB and GlnK in E. coli wild-type cells and various mutants of the PII signalling system in the presence of limiting amounts of ammonium. E. coli wild-type (WT), glnD (D), glnB (B) and glnK (K) mutant cells were grown in a medium containing 2 mM ammonium chloride as sole nitrogen source and glucose or glycerol as carbon source, in the presence or absence of 2 mM cAMP, as indicated. The uridylylation status was analysed as described in Fig. 1. (A) Immunodetection with GlnB-specific antibodies. (B) Immunodetection with GlnK-specific antibodies. For the deuridylylation control, (lane C), an extract was prepared as described in Fig. 1(B), except that the cells were treated for 5 min with 0·2 % ammonium chloride.

 
In the presence of 2 mM ammonium, synthesis of GlnK, like that of GS, no longer responded to the carbon source or towards cAMP (Fig. 3B). The GlnK protein that was detected by immunoblotting was present in its completely uridylylated state. The uridylylation status of the GlnB protein again paralleled the expression level of the NtrC-dependent genes glnA and glnK: a high degree of GlnB uridylylation was detected in the wild-type and in the glnK mutant, regardless of the carbon source or of cAMP (Fig. 3A). As expected, no GlnB modification occurred in the glnD mutant. The result of this experiment showed unequivocally that, when glutamine was replaced by a limiting amount of ammonium, GlnB signal transduction and NtrC-dependent gene expression did not respond to the carbon source or to cAMP. Therefore, poor carbon sources or cAMP are not directly sensed by the PII signalling system. More plausibly, when glutamine is used as nitrogen source, the cells might experience nitrogen-sufficient conditions in the presence of elevated cAMP levels.

In the presence of cAMP, extracellular glutamine elicits a nitrogen-excess signal
Next, an experiment was performed to test whether exogenously added glutamine directly elicits a nitrogen-excess signal in the presence of cAMP. The cellular nitrogen status was monitored through determination of the adenylylation status of GS. Adenylylation of GS responds to the intracellular nitrogen status, determined by the cellular glutamine level, in a dual way: adenylylation is stimulated by non-uridylylated PII (which accumulates in the presence of elevated glutamine levels) and also responds directly to elevated glutamine levels (Jaggi et al., 1997; Jiang et al., 1998c). Therefore, increased cellular glutamine pools are reflected by increased GS adenylylation. Cells of wild-type and of the glnB and glnK mutants were grown in ammonium-limited, glucose-supplemented medium, in the absence or presence of 2 mM cAMP. At the mid-exponential phase of growth, glutamine was added to the cultures (14 mM final concentration), and over a 20 min time period, samples were removed and the adenylylation state of GS was assayed. As shown in Fig. 4(A), in wild-type cells, the adenylylation state of GS rapidly and permanently increased upon the addition of glutamine, but only when the cells had been grown in the presence of cAMP. By contrast, in the absence of cAMP, addition of glutamine caused only a slight and transient increase in GS adenylylation. In the GlnK-deficient strain, a similar cAMP-dependent GS adenylylation was observed (Fig. 4C). In the glnB mutant, GS was already highly adenylylated at the beginning of the experiment (Fig. 4B), since GlnB is required for the deadenylylation of GS under nitrogen-limiting conditions (Jiang et al., 1998c; Forchhammer et al., 1999). Thus, in the absence of GlnB, GS is highly adenylylated even under nitrogen-poor conditions, and no further increase can be observed upon the addition of glutamine.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. cAMP- and glutamine-dependent in vivo adenylylation of GS. Cells of E. coli wild-type (A), glnB (B) and glnK (C) mutants were grown in a medium containing 2 mM ammonium chloride as sole nitrogen source and glucose as carbon source, in the presence or absence of 2 mM cAMP. When the cultures reached an OD600 of 0·4–0·45, 0·2 % (w/v) glutamine was added, and at time point 0 (before the addition of glutamine) and after 2 min, 4 min, 10 min and 20 min, samples were removed for the analysis of GS adenylylation as described in Methods. {blacksquare}, cAMP-treated cells; {lozenge}, cells grown in the absence of cAMP.

 
Another way to monitor an increase in intracellular glutamine levels is to analyse glutamine-dependent deuridylylation of GlnB. Wild-type cells were grown in glucose-supplemented, ammonium-limited medium in the presence or absence of 2 mM cAMP. Following the addition of 14 mM glutamine to the cultures, aliquots were removed after 0, 4, 10 and 20 min and the uridylylation status of GlnB was revealed by non-denaturing PAGE and immunoblotting. As shown in Fig. 5, GlnB is almost completely uridylylated prior to the addition of glutamine (t0). In the absence of cAMP only a minor and transient deuridylylation of GlnB can be observed upon the addition of glutamine, and the protein returns to its highly uridylylated state. By contrast, in the presence of cAMP, the addition of glutamine causes a drastic and permanent deuridylylation of GlnB. This result shows that deuridylylation of GlnB is a direct consequence of glutamine addition to cAMP-treated cells and corroborates our suggestion that cAMP increases the cellular glutamine level when glutamine is used as nitrogen source.



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. cAMP- and glutamine-dependent GlnB deuridylylation. Wild-type E. coli cells were grown with glucose and 2 mM ammonium chloride in the presence or absence of 2 mM cAMP until the mid-exponential phase of growth. An aliquot was removed (0) prior to the addition of 14 mM glutamine to the cultures. Thereafter, aliquots were removed at the indicated time points and the uridylylation state of GlnB was revealed by immunoblot analysis of non-denaturing gels (see Methods).

 
To reveal the concentration of external glutamine required to cause the observed effects, wild-type cells were grown as above and different amounts of glutamine, ranging from 1·4 mM to 21 mM were added at the mid-exponential phase of growth. After different times, aliquots were removed and the adenylylation state of GS was analysed. The result, shown in Fig. 6, reveals that at least 5 mM glutamine is required to elicit a measurable response. The effect saturates at concentrations above 14 mM, indicating the involvement of a mechanism with low affinity for glutamine.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Dependence of in vivo GS adenylylation in cAMP-treated cells on the glutamine concentration. E. coli wild-type cells were grown in six parallel conditions in medium containing glucose as carbon source, 2 mM ammonium chloride as nitrogen source in the presence of 2 mM cAMP until the mid-exponential phase of growth and with varying glutamine concentration. Prior to the addition of glutamine, an aliquot was removed from each culture for the determination of the initial GS adenylylation state. Then, the following amounts of glutamine (final concentration) were added to the parallel cultures: 1·4 mM ({circ}), 3·4 mM ({blacktriangleup}), 5 mM ({square}), 7 mM ({blacksquare}), 14 mM ({lozenge}), 21 mM ({triangleup}). After 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 min, aliquots were removed from each culture and the adenylylation state of GS was analysed.

 
L-Glutamine transport in E. coli has been shown to occur through a well-characterized high-affinity-binding-protein-dependent system and poorly characterized low affinity system(s). The high-affinity system, encoded by the glnHPQ operon, is under the control of NtrC (Willis et al., 1975; Claverie-Martin & Magasanik, 1991), and is therefore activated when the cells grow with glucose as carbon and glutamine as nitrogen source. Despite the presence of glutamine at concentrations as high as 14 mM, GlnB signals nitrogen deficiency. It follows, therefore, that the uptake rate limits glutamine utilization, since this concentration exceeds the Km of the glnHPQ transporter for glutamine (Km 0·1–0·2 µM) by several orders of magnitude (McFall & Newman, 1996). However, when the cells are cAMP-treated or grown with poor carbon sources, high concentrations of external glutamine are perceived as a nitrogen-excess condition, indicating an accelerated glutamine transport into the cells by low-affinity system(s). One of these could involve the osmotic-shock-sensitive L-glutamate-L-asparate transport system (Weiner & Heppel, 1971). Its binding protein has a low affinity for glutamine and synthesis of this protein was shown to be repressed in growth on glucose as opposed to succinate (Willis & Furlong, 1975), suggesting that synthesis of this transport system is under catabolite repression. A further way by which the external glutamine could increase the intracellular glutamine status involves periplasmic glutaminase activity, uptake of hydrolysed ammonium and re-assimilation of ammonium by intracellular GS activity. E. coli possesses a periplasmic asparaginase enzyme, the asnB product L-asparaginase II, which displays low glutaminase activity and whose expression requires the CRP–cAMP complex (McFall & Newman, 1996). Elucidation of the mechanistic details by which glutamine permeates cAMP-treated cells requires further investigation.

Outlook
Analysing the carbon effect on the PII-signalling system and NtrC-dependent gene expression in the presence of glutamine as nitrogen source revealed an indirect effect of the carbon source on nitrogen regulation. This occurs by catabolite repression influencing glutamine uptake. If we wish to address the question concerning a direct integration of carbon and nitrogen signals by the PII protein, in vivo conditions have to be chosen that avoid the use of glutamine as nitrogen source. Limiting amounts of ammonium seem to be appropriate for this purpose. Under such conditions, however, glnA and glnK expression did not respond significantly to the nature of the carbon source, as shown in this study. Therefore, it remains to be demonstrated whether GlnB, in addition to signalling the nitrogen status by uridylylation, integrates signals from the carbon status of the cells in vivo.


   ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We thank Heike Strobel for providing the GlnK-deficient strain HS10 and Mike Merrick for stimulating discussions. M. M. is a fellow of the International Quality Network Program (IQN) sponsored by DAAD at the University of Giessen. This work was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Fo 195/4-1).


   REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Adler, S. P., Purich, D. & Stadtman, E. R. (1975). Cascade control of Escherichia coli glutamine synthetase: properties of the PII regulatory protein and the uridylyltransferase-uridylylremoving enzyme. J Biol Chem 250, 6264–6272.[Abstract]

Arcondeguy, T. Jack R. & Merrick, M. (2001). PII signal transduction proteins: pivotal players in microbial nitrogen control. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 65, 80–105.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Atkinson, M. R. & Ninfa, A. J. (1998). Role of the GlnK signal transduction protein in the regulation of nitrogen assimilation in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 29, 431–447.[CrossRef][Medline]

Atkinson, M. A., Blauwkamp, T. A., Bondarenko, V., Studistky, V. & Ninfa, A. J. (2002a). Activation of the glnA, glnK and nac promoters as Escherichia coli undergoes the transition from nitrogen excess growth to nitrogen starvation. J Bacteriol 184, 5358–5363.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Atkinson, M. A., Blauwkamp, T. A. & Ninfa, A. J. (2002b). Context-dependent functions of the PII and GlnK signal transduction proteins in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 184, 5364–5375.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Backman, K., Chen, Y.-M. & Magasanik, B. (1981). Physical and genetic characterization of the glnA-glnG region of the Escherichia coli chromosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 78, 3743–3747.[Abstract]

Blauwkamp, T. A. & Ninfa, A. J. (2002a). Nac-mediated repression of the serA promoter of Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 45, 351–363.[CrossRef][Medline]

Blauwkamp, T. A. & Ninfa, A. J. (2002b). Physiological role of the GlnK signal transduction protein of Escherichia coli: survival of nitrogen starvation. Mol Microbiol 46, 203–214.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bradford, M. M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72, 248–254.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bueno, R., Pahel, G. & Magasanik, B. (1985). Role of glnB and glnD gene products in the regulation of the glnALG operon of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 164, 816–822.[Medline]

Claverie-Martin, F. & Magasanik, B. (1991). Role of the integration host factor in the regulation of the glnHp2 promoter of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88, 1631–1635.[Abstract]

Forchhammer, K., Hedler, A., Strobel, H. & Weiss, V. (1999). Heterotrimerization of PII-like signaling proteins: implications for PII-mediated signal transduction systems. Mol Microbiol 33, 338–349.[CrossRef][Medline]

Jaggi, R., Ybarlucea, W., Chea, E., Carr, P. D., Edwards, K. J., Ollis, D. L. & Vasudevan, S. G. (1996). The role of the T-loop of the signal transduction protein PII from Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett 391, 223–228.[CrossRef][Medline]

Jaggi, R., van Heeswijk, W. C., Westerhoff, H. V., Ollis, D. L. & Vasudevan, S. G. (1997). The two opposing activities of adenylyltransferase reside in distinct homologous domains, with intramolecular signal transduction. EMBO J 16, 5562–5571.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jiang, P. & Ninfa, A. J. (1999). Regulation of the autophosphorylation of Escherichia coli nitrogen regulator II by the PII signal transduction protein. J Bacteriol 181, 1906–1911.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jiang, P., Peliska, J. A. & Ninfa, A. J. (1998a). Enzymological characterization of the signal-transducing uridylyltransferase/uridylyl-removing enzyme (EC 2.7.7.59) of Escherichia coli and its interaction with the PII protein. Biochemistry 37, 12782–12794.[CrossRef][Medline]

Jiang, P., Peliska, J. A. & Ninfa, A. J. (1998b). Reconstitution of the signal-transduction bicyclic cascade responsible for the regulation of Ntr gene transcription in Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 37, 12795–12801.[CrossRef][Medline]

Jiang, P., Peliska, J. A. & Ninfa, A. J. (1998c). The regulation of Escherichia coli glutamine synthetase revisited: role of 2-ketoglutarate in the regulation of glutamine synthetase adenylylation state. Biochemistry 37, 12802–12810.[CrossRef][Medline]

Liu, J. & Magasanik, B. (1993). The glnB region of the Escherichia coli chromosome. J Bacteriol 175, 7441–7449.[Abstract]

Magasanik, B. (1996). Regulation of nitrogen utilization. In Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: Cellular and Molecular Biology, pp. 1344–1356. Edited by F. C. Neidhardt and others. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.

McFall, E. & Newman, E. B. (1996). Amino acids as carbon sources. In Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: Cellular and Molecular Biology, pp. 358–379. Edited by F. C. Neidhardt and others. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.

Ninfa, A. J. & Atkinson, M. R. (2000). PII signal transduction proteins. Trends Microbiol 8, 172–179.[CrossRef][Medline]

Pahel, G., Rothstein, D. M. & Magasanik, B. (1982). Complex glnA-glnL-glnG operon of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 76, 4544–4548.

Pioszak, A. A., Jiang, P. & Ninfa, A. J. (2000). The Escherichia coli PII signal transduction protein regulates the activities of the two-component system transmitter protein NRII by direct interaction with the kinase domain of the transmitter mode. Biochemistry 39, 13450–13461.[CrossRef][Medline]

Reitzer, L. J. (1996). Ammonia assimilation and the biosynthesis of glutamine, glutamate, aspartate, asparagine, L-alanine and D-alanine. In Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: Cellular and Molecular Biology, pp. 391–407. Edited by F. C. Neidhardt and others. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.

Reitzer, L. J. & Magasanik, B. (1985). Expression of glnA in Escherichia coli is regulated by tandem promoters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 82, 1979–1983.[Abstract]

Rhee, S. G., Chock, P. B. & Stadtman, E. R. (1985). Glutamine synthetase from Escherichia coli. Methods Enzymol 113, 213–241.[Medline]

Rippka, R. (1988). Isolation and purification of cyanobacteria. Methods Enzymol 167, 3–27.[Medline]

Saier, M. H., Ramseier, T. M. & Reizer, J. (1996). Regulation of carbon utilization. In Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: Cellular and Molecular Biology, pp. 1325–1343. Edited by F. C. Neidhardt and others. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.

Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. & Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.

Shapiro, B. M. & Stadtman, E. R. (1968). 5'-Adenylyl-O-tyrosine: the novel phosphodiester residue of adenylylated glutamine synthetase from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 243, 3769–3771.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Son, H. S. & Rhee, S. G. (1987). Cascade control of Escherichia coli glutamine synthetase. J Biol Chem 262, 8690–8695.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stadtman, E. R. (1990). Discovery of glutamine synthetase cascade. Methods Enzymol 182, 793–809.[Medline]

Stadtman, E. R., Smyrniotis, P. Z., Davis, N. J. & Wittenberger, M. E. (1979). Enzymatic procedures for determining the average state of adenylylation of Escherichia coli glutamine synthetase. Anal Biochem 95, 275–285.[Medline]

Strobel, H. (1998). Die Rolle von GlnY, PII und GlnK bei der Stimulierung der regulierten Dephosphorylierung von NtrC-P und Kontrolle der Glutaminsynthetase Aktivität. PhD thesis, Universität Konstanz.

Tian, Z.-X., Li, Q.-S., Buck, M., Kolb, A. & Wang, Y.-P. (2001). The CRP-cAMP complex and downregulation of the glnAp2 promoter provides a novel regulatory linkage between carbon metabolism and nitrogen assimilation in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 41, 911–924.[CrossRef][Medline]

van Heeswijk, W. C., Hoving, S., Molenaar, D., Stegeman, B., Kahn, D. & Westerhoff, H. V. (1996). An alternative PII protein in the regulation of glutamine synthetase in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 21, 133–146.[Medline]

Weiner, J. H. & Heppel, L. A. (1971). A binding protein for glutamine and its relation to active transport in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 246, 6933–6941.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Willis, R. C. & Furlong, C. E. (1975). Interactions of a glutamate-aspartate binding protein with the glutamate transport system of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 250, 2581–2586.[Abstract]

Willis, R. C., Iwata, K. K. & Furlong, C. E. (1975). Regulation of glutamine transport in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 122, 1032–1027.[Medline]

Received 30 April 2003; accepted 6 May 2003.