Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota 58105
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Wang, Hongyan and John J. Wagner. Priming-Induced Shift in Synaptic Plasticity in the Rat Hippocampus. J. Neurophysiol. 82: 2024-2028, 1999. The activity history of a given neuron has been suggested to influence its future responses to synaptic input in one prominent model of experience-dependent synaptic plasticity proposed by Bienenstock, Cooper, and Munro (BCM theory). Because plasticity of synaptic plasticity (i.e., metaplasticity) is similar in concept to aspects of the BCM proposal, we have tested the possibility that a form of metaplasticity induced by a priming stimulation protocol might exhibit BCM-like characteristics. CA1 field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) obtained from rat hippocampal slices were used to monitor synaptic responses before and after conditioning stimuli (3-100 Hz) of the Schaffer collateral inputs. A substantial rightward shift (>5-fold) in the frequency threshold between long-term depression (LTD) and long-term potentiation (LTP) was observed <1 h after priming. This change in the LTD/P crossover point occurred at both primed and unprimed synaptic pathways. These results provide new support for the existence of a rapid, heterosynaptic, experience-dependent mechanism that is capable of modifying the synaptic plasticity phenomena that are commonly proposed to be important for developmental and learning/memory processes in the brain.
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Network theories employing activity-dependent
changes in synaptic strength are prominent partners with experimental
approaches to investigating the mechanisms underlying learning and
memory at the molecular and cellular levels in the nervous system. A key feature of the network "learning rule" described by
Bienenstock, Cooper, and Munro (1982) (BCM theory) is
the concept of a sliding modification threshold,
M,
the value of which takes into account the prior activity of the
postsynaptic neuron. This concept is crucial for the preservation of a
dynamic response range of the neuron to synaptic stimulation, and it
previously has been suggested that
M may correspond
to the long-term depression (LTD)/long-term potentiation (LTP)
crossover point in conditioning frequency-response experiments
(Dudek and Bear 1992
). If so, then a growing group of
phenomena in which prior activity affects the subsequent induction of
synaptic plasticity (i.e., metaplasticity) (for review, see Abraham and Bear 1996
) may provide examples of shifting
M. One such example of metaplasticity involves the
use of a high-frequency stimulation (HFS) "priming" protocol that
results in the subsequent facilitation of LTD induction (Holland
and Wagner 1998
; Wexler and Stanton 1993
). In
this report, we describe the effects of HFS priming on a number of
conditioning frequencies delivered to both homosynaptic and
heterosynaptic pathways in the CA1 region of the rat hippocampal slice
preparation. Our experimental results are in good agreement with
several fundamental predictions of the BCM type of learning rule.
![]() |
METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (45-80 days old) were
anesthetized deeply by Halothane inhalation before decapitation. The
brain was removed from the cranium, and transverse hippocampal slices (500 µm) were cut in ice-cold saline using a vibratome. The CA3 region was removed surgically immediately after slice dissection. Slices then were submerged in a recording chamber and continuously perfused with saline saturated with 95% O2-5%
CO2 at ~1 ml/min. The recording chamber and
perfusion saline were then warmed to 30°C for the duration of the
experiment. The slices were incubated for 1 h in the chamber before
an experiment was begun. The saline contained (in mM) 120 NaCl , 3 KCl,
1.5 MgCl2, 1 NaH2PO4, 2.5 CaCl2,
26 NaHCO3, and 10 glucose.
Extracellular recording electrodes were filled with 300 mM NaCl and
placed in the s. radiatum of CA1. The field excitatory postsynaptic
potential (fEPSP) population responses were evoked with a bipolar
stimulating electrode (Kopf Instruments) placed on either the CA3 or
the subicular side of the recording electrode in the stratum radiatum.
Stimulation parameters consisted of single square waves of 40-90 µA
of 0.3-ms duration. Data were digitized at 10 kHz and analyzed with
pCLAMP 6 software (Axon Instruments). The initial slope of the
population EPSP was measured by fitting a straight line to the first
millisecond of the EPSP immediately after the fiber volley. Stimulus
response curves were performed at the beginning of each experiment.
Pulses of an intensity that gave 40-60% of the maximum response were
given at a frequency of 0.05 Hz for the remainder of the experiment.
All stimulation protocols were performed at the test pulse intensity,
and when two synaptic pathways were monitored, their independence was
evaluated as previously described (Wagner and Alger
1995). The conditioning protocol consisted of 600 pulses at the
indicated frequencies of stimulation that was repeated after a 10-min
interval. Priming was induced using two sets of three HFS (100 Hz/1 s)
trains given at an interval of 20 s, with 15 min between sets
(Holland and Wagner 1998
). Homosynaptic priming (as in
Fig. 2) was performed in the presence of
D,L-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (D,L-APV; 100 µM) to prevent LTP. Heterosynaptic priming of an independent pathway (as in Fig. 3) was performed in the absence of APV. For clarity, the responses during conditioning/priming protocols are not
illustrated in the figures.
Synaptic responses were quantified by averaging the EPSP slopes from 15 consecutive responses at baseline frequency 25-30 min after the completion of the conditioning protocol and dividing this value by the average of the 15 EPSP slopes from 5 min before beginning conditioning stimulation. Values for nonconditioned groups were obtained by monitoring the baseline response for an equivalent amount of time. Unless otherwise noted, the n values reported represent slices taken from different animals for a given experimental group (e.g., n = 6 is 6 slices obtained from 6 different animals).
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The extracellular field EPSP was monitored in the CA1 s.
radiatum of the hippocampal slice in response to Schaffer collateral stimulation. Two episodes of 600 pulses delivered at the indicated frequencies were administered at an interval of 10 min. This protocol has been used previously, at a frequency of 1 Hz, to study the induction of homosynaptic LTD in this preparation (Holland and Wagner 1998; Kerr and Abraham 1995
).
Activity-dependent plasticity is dependent on the frequency of conditioning
We have tested the effects of varying the frequency of
stimulation, while keeping the number of episodes and pulses delivered constant. As shown in Fig. 1A,
3-Hz stimulation had no consistent effect on baseline responses in
naïve (i.e., control) slices prepared from 45- to 80-day-old
rats (92 ± 7%, n = 8 slices from 7 animals) when
compared with nonconditioned control slices (98 ± 4%,
n = 4 slices). In contrast to this slight depression,
delivering the same number of pulses at 10 Hz resulted in a
potentiation of the synaptic response (122 ± 13%,
n = 6 slices from 5 animals, Fig. 1B).
Stimulation at 30 Hz (141 ± 12%, n = 7 slices
from 4 animals, Fig. 1C) and 100 Hz (117 ± 7%,
n = 6 slices, Fig. 1D) resulted in
significant amounts of potentiation. We observed significantly less
potentiation at 100 Hz compared with that observed after the 30-Hz
protocol (an "inverted U-shaped" relationship) (cf. Christie
et al. 1995). This effect is not a predicted result from BCM
and is possibly due to the induction of depotentiation during the
relatively long (6-s) 100-Hz trains (Abraham and Huggett
1997
). These results, and the statistical comparisons with the
control, nonconditioned (i.e., the 0.05-Hz baseline test frequency)
slice group are summarized in Fig. 1E.
|
Homosynaptic priming results in an experience-dependent shift in synaptic plasticity
Similar experiments were interleaved with those described
above in which the slice was "primed" via a high-frequency
stimulation protocol prior to the delivery of 3- to 100-Hz conditioning
protocols (Fig. 2, A-D). We
previously have observed that this form of HFS priming significantly
facilitates the induction of LTD after 1-Hz conditioning
(Holland and Wagner 1998; Wagner and Alger
1995
). As shown in Fig. 2A, priming enhanced the
depression observed after 3-Hz conditioning (80 ± 3%,
n = 7 slices from 6 animals), such that a significant
amount of LTD was present compared with primed slices that did not
experience conditioning stimulation (103 ± 7%, n = 4 slices). Priming altered the response to 10-Hz conditioning in an
even more striking manner, qualitatively as well as quantitatively. A
significant depression occurred after 10-Hz stimulation of primed
slices (78 ± 3%, n = 5 slices, Fig. 2B), whereas the same conditioning protocol resulted in a
potentiation in unprimed control slices (see Fig. 1B).
Priming also significantly altered the response to 30-Hz stimulation.
The amount of potentiation observed in controls after 30-Hz stimulation
was attenuated in the primed slices (108 ± 7%, n = 5 slices, Fig. 2C). When a 100-Hz conditioning protocol
was tested in primed slices, a significant amount of potentiation
occurred (121 ± 6%, n = 5 slices, Fig. 2D). These results, and the statistical comparisons with the
primed, unconditioned (i.e., the 0.05-Hz baseline test frequency) slice group are summarized in Fig. 2E.
|
Heterosynaptic priming results in an experience-dependent shift in synaptic plasticity
The results illustrated in Fig. 2 demonstrate that the
priming of a given synaptic pathway can alter the subsequent response to conditioning stimulation of the same pathway (i.e., a homosynaptic effect). We also tested for any heterosynaptic actions in a third group
of slices by first priming one synaptic input and then applying a 3- to
100-Hz conditioning protocol to a second, independent input (Fig.
3, A-D). As we have observed
previously using 1-Hz conditioning (Holland and Wagner
1998), the priming of heterosynaptic inputs significantly
shifts the synaptic plasticity response in a manner analogous to that
observed for the homosynaptically primed pathway. Thus both 3- and
10-Hz conditioning resulted in the occurrence of depression (79 ± 3%, 86 ± 2%, n = 5 slices each, Fig. 3,
A and B, respectively). Also, consistent with our
previous findings (Holland and Wagner 1998
), the
depression was homosynaptic because the potentiated synaptic responses
of the primed pathway were not significantly affected after
conditioning (data not shown). As was the case with homosynaptic
priming, the potentiation observed in controls after 30-Hz conditioning
was not present in the heterosynaptically primed slices (101 + 5%,
n = 5 slices from 4 animals, Fig. 3C). When
a 100-Hz conditioning protocol was tested in heterosynaptically primed
slices, a significant amount of potentiation occurred (131 ± 7%,
n = 5 slices from 4 animals, Fig. 3D). These
results and the statistical comparisons with the unprimed control data
at the corresponding frequencies from Fig. 1 are summarized in
Fig. 3E.
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Our findings in this report provide strong experimental
evidence for the existence of a nonlinear, sliding modification
threshold rule governing synaptic plasticity in the hippocampal slice
preparation of the type envisioned by Bienenstock, Cooper, and
Munro (1982). Although experimental results in favor of a
BCM-like learning rule have been steadily accumulating in recent years,
support has been lacking in at least two critical areas (for review,
see Abraham and Tate 1997
; Bear 1996
):
First, the BCM model employs a synaptic modification threshold
(
M, analogous to the
LTD/P "crossover" point in our data, see Fig. 3F), the value
of which is predicted to be the same at all modifiable synapses of the neuron at any given point in time. Although the relative position of
M is not fixed and is allowed to shift according to
the prior postsynaptic activity of the neuron, its value must be the
same at all modifiable synapses (i.e., primed and unprimed synapses). By employing a range of conditioning frequencies at nonprimed control,
homosynaptically primed, and heterosynaptically primed synaptic
pathways, we tested for evidence of this heterosynaptic feature of the
BCM model. Any change in the position of the LTD/P crossover point
elicited by our HFS priming protocol should be evident at inactive
(unprimed) synapses as well as active (primed) ones. This is the result
we obtained when the effects of heterosynaptic priming were assessed.
As can be seen in Fig. 3F, a significant shift in the LTD/P
crossover point has occurred after priming that is expressed at both
primed and unprimed synaptic inputs (
and
, respectively),
compared with the control frequency-response curve (
). Furthermore
this rightward shift after priming was quantitatively comparable for
both active (~5-fold) and inactive (~7-fold) synapses. This finding
is consistent with a uniform value of
M at all
modifiable synapses of the neuron, irrespective of their individual
histories of activity.
A second area of question involves practical matters related to
the temporal aspect of changing the value of M. It
has been suggested that perhaps a shift in
M would
not occur in an in vitro preparation or that the required duration of
stimulation exceeds the typical viability of the slice preparation
(Bear 1996
). The possibility also has been offered that
stimulation patterns that emulate the large-scale effects of sensory
deprivation (as in the case of dark rearing, for example) are
required to observe a shift in the value of
M
(Abraham and Tate 1997
). However (as underscored by
Bear 1996
), if a means of attaining rapid shifts in the
modification threshold was not possible, the use of the sliding
modification threshold would be greatly diminished. If the rapid
changes (e.g., seconds/minutes) in synaptic strength such as those
exemplified by typical LTP/D induction protocols are potentially of
physiological relevance, then a concomitantly paced sliding of
M also must be able to take place to prevent saturation of depression or potentiation. Evidence for a shift in
M has been obtained by investigating the effects of
sensory deprivation in vivo (during a period of weeks) on synaptic
plasticity in slices from visual cortex (Kirkwood et al.
1996
), and significant reversal occurred after 2 days of light
exposure. Although we have not yet systematically explored the minimum
temporal relationship between priming and conditioning stimulation in
our experiments, it is clear from Fig. 3F that the LTD/P
crossover point can shift significantly by 45 min after the initiation
of priming. Thus the HFS priming protocol we have employed provides an
example of how the value of
M might be changed
rapidly in a manner more compatible with other means of inducing
synaptic plasticity in an in vitro slice preparation. The results are
consistent with the existence of a BCM-like mechanism at work in the
CA1 region of the hippocampus.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
J. J. Wagner is supported by National Institutes on Drug Abuse Grant DA-11040.
![]() |
FOOTNOTES |
---|
Address for reprint requests: J. J. Wagner, College of Pharmacy, 123 Sudro Hall, Fargo, ND 58105.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 2 April 1999; accepted in final form 4 June 1999.
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|