1The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, Departments of Neurological Surgery and Physiology and Biophysics, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida 33136; 2Department of Physiology, University of Umeå, SE-90187 Umeå, Sweden; and 3Department of Pediatrics, Yale University Medical School, New Haven, Connecticut 06520
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Thomas, C. K., R. S. Johansson, and B. Bigland-Ritchie. Pattern of Pulses That Maximize Force Output From Single Human Thenar Motor Units. J. Neurophysiol. 82: 3188-3195, 1999. We assessed the sequence of nerve impulses that maximize force output from individual human thenar motor units. When these motor units were stimulated intraneurally by a variable sequence of seven pulses, the pattern of pulses that elicited maximum force always started with a short (5-15 ms) interpulse interval termed a "doublet." The twitch force summation caused by this "doublet" elicited, on average, 48 ± 13% (SD) of the maximum tetanic force. The peak amplitude of "doublet" forces was 3.5 times that of the initial twitches, and twitch potentiation appeared to have little influence on twitch force summation elicited by the "doublets." For some units, the second optimal interpulse interval was also short. Peak forces elicited by the third to sixth interpulse intervals did not change substantially when the last interpulse interval was varied between 5 to 55 ms, so maximum force could not be attributed to any unique interpulse interval. Each successive pulse contributed a smaller force increment. When five to seven pulses were delivered in an optimal sequence, the evoked force was close to that recorded during maximal tetanic stimulation. In contrast, maximal force-time integral was evoked with one short interpulse interval (5-15 ms) then substantially longer interpulse intervals (>100 ms). Maximum force and force-time integrals were therefore elicited by different patterns of stimuli. We conclude that a brief initial interpulse interval (5-15 ms) is required to elicit maximum "doublet" force from human thenar motor units and that near-maximal tetanic forces can be elicited by only five or six additional post-"doublet" pulses if appropriately spaced in time. However, the rate at which these post-"doublet" stimuli must be provided is fairly uncritical. In contrast, maximum post-"doublet" force-time integrals were obtained at intervals corresponding to motoneuronal firing rates of ~7 Hz, rates close to that typically used to recruit motor units and to maintain weak voluntary contractions.
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
When a human motor unit is recruited in a
voluntary contraction it often fires with two closely spaced impulses,
termed a "doublet", followed by longer interpulse intervals that
maintain the contraction (Bawa and Calancie 1983;
Desmedt and Godaux 1977
; Kudina and Alexeeva
1992
). Impulse patterns of one or two short interpulse
intervals followed by longer intervals maximize the force-time integral
from triceps surae motor units of the cat (Burke et al.
1976
; Parmiggiani and Stein 1981
; Zajac
and Young 1980a
,b
). Likewise, whole mammalian muscles show
similar response behaviors when their peripheral nerves are stimulated
(Binder-Macleod and Barker 1991
; Cooper and
Eccles 1930
; Stein and Parmiggiani 1981
). Thus
the pattern by which motoneurons fire when initially recruited strongly
influences the force motor units subsequently generate. The first aim
of the present study was to determine the sequence of pulses that
maximize force from individual human thenar motor units when stimulated
intraneurally. These data provide the information needed to effectively
stimulate muscle that cannot be driven voluntarily, thereby providing
the possibility of restoring limb movement artificially. The second aim
of this study was to examine the magnitude of twitch force potentiation
that resulted from the delivery of these stimuli. Twitch potentiation
following muscle activation is common in human, cat, and rat motor
units (Bagust et al. 1974
; Burke et al.
1973
; Kernell et al. 1975
; Nordstrom and
Miles 1990
; Olson and Swett 1971
;
Stephens and Usherwood 1977
; Thomas et al.
1990
; Young and Mayer 1981
). Force changes due
to potentiation and different patterns of stimulation could then be
compared. Some of the present results have been published as an
abstract (Bigland-Ritchie et al. 1997
).
![]() |
METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Subjects and experimental setup
Four men and three women with no history of any neurological disorder were chosen as research subjects. Each subject gave their informed consent to participate in the experiments, all of which were approved by the ethics committee of Umeå University, Sweden.
The experimental setup shown in Fig.
1A has been described
previously (Westling et al. 1990). Briefly, the subject
reclined in a dental chair and the subject's right arm was extended,
the hand supinated, and the forearm immobilized in a vacuum cast. The
dorsal aspects of the hand and fingers rested in, and were firmly
stabilized by, molded modeling clay. The fingers were also constrained
by U-shaped clamps anchored in the clay. The extended thumb rested
against a two-dimensional force transducer placed against the
interphalangeal joint. The thumb position was adjusted until the force
transducer registered 0.5 N resting tension in the directions of both
abduction and flexion. Thumb flexion and abduction forces were measured
simultaneously at right angles by the use of the two-dimensional force
transducer.
|
Single motor axons of the median nerve that innervate thenar motor
units were stimulated electrically through a tungsten microelectrode (Vallbo et al. 1979) inserted into the median nerve
~10 cm proximal to the elbow. After an appropriate nerve fascicle was
impaled, the tungsten microelectrode was moved in minute steps until a weak stimulus current evoked all-or-none electromyogram (EMG) and force in a thenar motor unit. Strict criteria were applied to
ensure that the force and EMG responses arose from only a single motor
unit (Westling et al. 1990
). Distal and proximal unitary thenar surface EMG signals were recorded using three flexible electrodes, each made from braided strands (0.004 mm2) of
silver-coated copper wire (Fig. 1A). A common electrode
lay transversely across the mid-muscle belly, a distal electrode across the metacarpal joint, and a proximal electrode over the base of the
thenar eminence. The resultant force elicited from each motor unit was
calculated continuously from the recorded abduction and flexion
components. Force baseline fluctuations caused by cardio-respiratory processes were minimized by resetting the force electronically to a
preset zero just before the delivery of each stimulus or package of
stimuli. All stimuli were triggered in fixed relation to the pulse
pressure cycle, which was assessed from an infrared blood pressure
pulse detector attached to the subject's finger (Westling et
al. 1990
). Thus all stimuli or pulse trains were separated by
~0.8 s intervals, depending on the heart rate.
Protocol
For each motor unit, we determined the pattern of seven
pulses which maximized force output, a process we termed an "interval test." First, two stimuli were delivered to the motor axon at progressively shorter intervals until they were 5 ms apart. Starting with an interpulse interval of 500 ms, this was reduced in steps of 100 ms to 200 ms (4 pulse pairs), then in 20 ms steps from 180 ms to 80 ms
(6 pulse pairs), and in 5 ms steps from 75 ms to 5 ms (15 pulse pairs).
This sequence, a total of 25 pulse-pairs, is referred to as "run 1"
of the interval test. The interpulse interval that elicited the
strongest force was termed the first optimal interval and was the first
interpulse interval in all subsequent runs. In run 2, the second
optimal interpulse interval was determined by delivering a third pulse
at progressively shorter intervals in relation to the preceding
force-optimized pulse-pair (Fig. 1B). We repeated this
process in runs 3-6 until six optimum interpulse intervals were
defined. Thus each pulse train in runs 2-6 involved delivery of 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 pulses, respectively. Before and after the interval test,
each unit was stimulated with 5 pulses at 1 Hz to elicit single
twitches (Thomas et al. 1990). Single twitches were also
recorded within the interval test when the interpulse intervals were
longer than those at which any twitch fusion occurred.
After the interval test, the relation between motor unit force and
stimulus frequency was recorded by stimulating each unit for 1-2 s at
rates from 5 Hz to 100 Hz as described in Thomas et al. (1991a). This
provided values of maximum tetanic force and the frequency required to
elicit any fraction thereof. The units were then fatigued with 13 pulses at 40 Hz each second for two minutes and force fatigue indices
were calculated (final force/initial force) (Burke et al. 1973
; Thomas
et al. 1991b
).
Data collection and analysis
Motor unit EMG and force data were sampled on-line at 3,200 Hz
and 400 Hz, respectively, using SC/Zoom software (Department of
Physiology, Umeå University, Sweden). Event markers and stimulus pulses were recorded at 0.3 ms accuracy (Westling et al.
1990). Peak force, force-time integral, time to peak force
(contraction time, CT), and time for the force to fall from peak to
half-peak force (half-relaxation time) were measured from averages of 5 consecutive twitches recorded before and after the interval test, and
from 1 to 3 single twitches obtained within the interval test. For each
unit, we normalized the values obtained within and after the interval
test to the corresponding initial twitch parameters to assess twitch
force and force-time integral potentiation and contractile speed
changes. We also normalized twitch force values to the maximum tetanic
force to determine twitch/tetanus force ratios.
Contractile responses to multiple pulses (n = 2-7) were measured as described above for twitches (peak force, force-time integral from force start to end, and time to peak force, CT; see Fig. 2, inset) except that no measures of half-relaxation time were made. For each response in a run, the peak force and force-time integral of the initial fixed pulse response (e.g., two pulses in run 2) were subtracted from the values obtained for all pulses delivered (e.g., three pulses in run 2) to determine which last interpulse interval evoked the greatest peak force and force-time integral increment.
|
Statistics
Mean values ± SD are given. "Doublet" data from all 21 units are provided. Analysis of twitch force potentiation during the interval test was based on the 14 units that completed all runs of the interval test using repeated measures analysis of variance with run number as the fixed effect (7 levels; prerun and run 1-6). Least squares linear regression was used to assess correlations between different parameters. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Twenty-one thenar motor axons were stimulated intraneurally to
determine the temporal pattern of seven pulses that maximized motor
unit force. The twitch forces of these units, measured before the
interval test, ranged from 3.0 to 44.5 mN (mean 16.1 ± 13.0 mN),
contraction times ranged from 37.5 to 91.9 ms (57.9 ± 16.1 ms),
and half-relaxation times ranged from 32.5 to 130.0 ms (66.5 ± 21.5 ms), all unimodally distributed. Their tetanic forces in response
to 50 Hz stimulation ranged from 28 to 193 mN (99.3 ± 50.6 mN),
force fatigue indices ranged from 0.33 to 1.14 (0.83 ± 0.25), and
twitch/tetanus force ratios ranged from 0.03 to 0.31 (0.18 ± 0.09). These values and their distributions were similar to those found
for the larger population of 45 units studied for other purposes
(Thomas et al. 1990, 1991a
,b
; Westling et al.
1990
).
The first optimal interpulse interval was determined for all 21 units, but successful recording from some units was subsequently lost. The number of units from which complete sets of measurements could be made declined to 14 units in run 6. When mean values are shown for the entire interval test (runs 1-6), they are based on data from 14 units. However, the behavior of these units was representative of the initial 21 units.
Force responses to a pair of stimuli
Figure 2 shows how the twitch forces of a representative unit
summed as pairs of stimulus pulses were delivered at progressively closer interpulse intervals. Peak force and force-time integral were
greatest when the pulses were 5 ms apart, and were respectively 3.4 and
5.0 times greater than the values for single twitches (Fig. 3,
A and B). Peak
force was 39% of the maximum tetanic force (Fig. 3C). Two
shocks applied 5 ms apart also elicited the most rapid rise in force
and the shortest time to peak force (CT, Fig. 3D). EMG
potentials produced by each stimulus were strikingly similar at all
interpulse intervals >5 ms (Fig. 2). With a 5 ms interpulse interval,
the two EMG potentials of most units began to fuse, although force
continued to rise or was similar to that produced by a 10 ms interval.
At interpulse intervals <5 ms, tested prior to the formal protocol,
the force was depressed relative to that evoked by a 5 ms or 10 ms
interpulse interval (see Burke et al. 1976).
|
All but one unit generated maximal force when two pulses were delivered
either 5 ms or 10 ms apart (15 and 5 units, respectively). The force
from only one unit was greatest with an interpulse interval of 15 ms.
The force-time integrals also reached maximum values at 5, 10, and 15 ms for 12, 7, and 2 units, respectively. We termed the short interpulse
intervals that generated maximum force "doublet's" because they
resembled the closely-spaced muscle potentials that are often recorded
at the onset of voluntary contractions that are termed doublet's
(Bawa and Calancie 1983; Desmedt and Godaux 1977
; Kudina and Alexeeva 1992
).
Both the peak force and force-time integral elicited by a "doublet" varied considerably between units. For all 21 units, the "doublet" forces averaged 3.5 ± 1.6 times the initial twitch force and were 48 ± 13% of maximum tetanic force. The force-time integrals of the "doublets" were 5.6 ± 3.6 times those of the initial twitches. The greatest summation ("doublet" force/twitch force) occurred in units with weak twitch forces, low twitch/tetanic force ratios (Fig. 4, A and C), and small twitch force-time integrals (not shown). Units with small twitch force-time integrals also showed the greatest force-time integral summation (Fig. 4B). No correlation was found between force summation and tetanic force however. The mean time to peak "doublet force" (CT) was 1.4 ± 0.4 times the initial twitch contraction time. The ratio of "doublet" CT to initial twitch CT was greatest for fast units (Fig. 4D). Force summation ("doublet" force/twitch force) was not correlated to twitch CT.
|
Force generated by pulses that followed the initial "doublet"
Figure 5A shows, for a representative unit, how force summated as an additional pulse was delivered at progressively shorter intervals in run 4. With an interpulse interval of 120 ms, the last pulse added substantially to the force-time integral but did not contribute to the peak force. Peak force only increased when the last interpulse interval was reduced to 70 ms or less. Figure 5B shows, for the same unit, alterations in peak force of the last pulse in runs 1-6. At long intervals, the last pulse in each run evoked only twitches. The force from the last pulse in each run only increased as the twitches began to fuse with the preceding fixed pulse response. At intervals shorter than 45 ms, the force contribution from the last pulse was indistinguishable from the fixed pulse response. It was also independent of interpulse interval during runs 3-6. For this unit, the interpulse interval in run 2 had to be reduced to 5 ms to elicit maximum force, as in run 1. However, for other units, peak forces elicited by pulses in runs 2-6 did not change substantially when the last interpulse interval was varied between 5 and 55 ms. Thus in runs 3-6 and sometimes run 2, the peak force elicited could not be attributed to any unique interpulse interval.
|
Figure 5C shows, for the same motor unit, the effects of interpulse interval on the force-time integral for the whole contraction. For this and other units, the force-time integrals increased as more pulses were added; the increase was roughly proportional to the number of pulses delivered. This was in contrast to the increase in peak force, which was largest in run 1, declined progressively in runs 2-4, and was negligible thereafter (Fig. 5B).
Figure 6A shows the maximal forces elicited from one motor unit in runs 1-6, recorded when interpulse intervals of 5, 15, 25, 30, 35, and 35 ms, respectively, were delivered. These forces are compared with the force evoked by a constant frequency train of stimuli at 50 Hz (- - -). The maximal force increased during runs 1-4. The largest force increment, relative to the twitch, occurred in response to the "doublet" (run 1). The force increment elicited by each additional pulse became progressively smaller until, in runs 5 and 6, no further force increase occurred.
|
Figure 6B shows the increase in force output as we gradually added interpulse intervals that maximized the peak force output in runs 1-6. Mean unit force increased from 51 ± 12% of maximal tetanic force in run 1 ("doublet" force) to 92 ± 11% in run 6. It is interesting to note that while a "doublet" elicited approximately half-maximal tetanic force, it took four or five additional pulses to elicit a further 41% maximum tetanic force. Nevertheless, when an appropriate pulse pattern was applied, almost full tetanic force was achieved with only six or seven pulses.
The mean values for the force and force-time integral increment
contributed by the last pulse in each run are shown in Fig. 6,
C and D, respectively (). Although the maximum
additional force per pulse was greatest for "doublets" and then
declined progressively in runs 2-6, the mean increments in force-time
integrals per pulse were similar for each additional pulse. Maximal
force output in runs 1-6 was obtained with mean interpulse intervals of 9 ± 8, 19 ± 11, 28 ± 11, 33 ± 10, 36 ± 9, and 29 ± 7 ms, respectively (Fig. 6C,
). Using
these interpulse intervals, maximal force-time integral in runs 2-6
occurred when the last interpulse interval was 104 ± 41, 143 ± 36, 145 ± 52, 134 ± 41, and 144 ± 30 ms,
respectively (Fig. 6D,
). The force-time integral in run
1 was greatest when the two pulses were 7 ± 4 ms apart, on average.
Twitch force and force-time integral potentiation
The twitch forces increased significantly during the course of the interval test (Fig. 7, A and B). On average, twitch forces increased from 17.4 ± 11.5 mN, measured before the test, to 23.9 ± 11.5 mN at the end of run 6. That is, after 675 pulses had been applied over approximately 4 min, twitch force was 1.5 ± 0.6 times initial values. Force-time integral values were 1.7 ± 1.1 times initial values after run 6. In contrast to twitch forces, "doublet" forces did not show any signs of potentiation. At the end of runs 1 and 2, mean "doublet" forces were 46.2 ± 27.1 and 46.1 ± 28.0 mN, respectively. "Doublet" forces were not recorded in runs 3-6 because these runs involved 4-7 pulses.
|
Figure 7, C and D, shows that twitch force potentiation was significantly greater for units with weak twitch forces and low twitch/tetanic force ratios. Potentiation was not accompanied by significant changes in twitch contraction and half-relaxation times. However, units with long initial twitch CT (slow units) became somewhat faster, whereas those with short initial twitch CT tended to slow down in run 1, with little further change thereafter. After runs 1 and 6, twitch CT was 1.04 ± 0.22 and 1.05 ± 0.23 times initial, respectively. Neither potentiation of twitch force nor of twitch force-time integral was correlated to initial CT or half-relaxation.
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The pulse sequence that elicited the greatest force from a human thenar motor unit always started with a short 5-15 ms interval between the first two pulses. For all 21 units, this "doublet" caused the force to increase by more than the linear sum of two twitches elicited separately (mean, 3.4× twitch force). Force summation was greatest for weak units with small twitch force-time integrals and with low twitch/tetanus ratios. Some units needed a second short interpulse interval to maximize force. Additional pulses caused a further increase in force, but the extra force elicited became progressively smaller and was less sensitive to changes in interpulse interval. After seven pulses were delivered, the force reached 92 ± 11% maximum unit tetanic force measured by pulse trains at 50 Hz. The pulse pattern that elicited peak force and force-time integral did not coincide after the first short interpulse interval. Longer interpulse intervals maximized the force-time integral whereas shorter intervals maximized peak force.
This behavior of human thenar motor units is similar to that reported
previously by Burke et al. (1976), Parmiggiani and Stein (1981)
, and
Zajac and Young (1980a)
when single units and/or whole muscles were
stimulated in a similar way in cat. Again, all units exerted maximum
force-time integral when stimulated by a train of pulses commencing
with a 5-10 ms "doublet" followed by longer intervals. Zajac and
Young (1980a)
measured changes in force-time integrals for isometric
contractions of cat medial gastrocnemius motor units. They found that
fast units with low twitch/tetanus force ratios often needed two,
rather than one, short (transitional) intervals before high force-time
integrals could be sustained by subsequent longer intervals, as found
here for some human thenar motor units (see Fig. 5). They suggested
that two transitional intervals were needed when unit force was less
potentiated. The protocol used in the present study did not allow these
relationships to be explored in detail. They also found that maximal
values required a steady state post-"doublet" interpulse interval
of about 1.8× CT for each unit. For human thenar units, the maximum force-time integral during runs 3-6 usually occurred at approximately 140 ms intervals (2.4× mean twitch contraction time). This difference in post-"doublet" interval between the results of Zajac and Young (1980a)
and ours probably arises because we selected the interpulse interval that maximized the peak force rather than the force-time integral. Differences may also relate to the lack of fast fatigable type units found in human thenar muscles (Thomas et al.
1991b
) and to the absence of any significant correlations
between unit force and speed observed in most human motor unit studies
(Bigland-Ritchie et al. 1998
).
"Doublet" force summation
That the "doublet" force should be substantially greater than
the summed force of two twitches elicited separately is explained in
part by muscle mechanics. Hill (1949, 1953
) demonstrated that, for frog
muscle, the muscle series elastic component primarily determines the
twitch/tetanus force ratio. If a twitch is preceded by a quick stretch
such that the muscle series elastic elements become fully prestretched,
the twitch force is then equal to that of the tetanus. Thus the
increased amplitude of a "doublet," compared with a twitch, would
result directly from the stretch provided by the contractile response
of the first pulse that takes up slack and stretches the unit's series
components. A second pulse following closely thereafter will then
elicit a force response substantially greater than that of the sum of
two twitches elicited separately. Thus the "doublet" response
approaches, to a greater or lesser extent, the force from maximal
tetanic stimulation.
In the current experiments, "doublet" forces in run 1 averaged 48 ± 13% maximum tetanic force, and twitch forces averaged 17.8 ± 8.8%. Although "doublet" force-time integrals were 6.8 ± 6.7 times those of single twitches, the increases were mainly because of the increase in force amplitude (3.5 ± 1.6 times initial twitch values). The force-time integral also increased because of the increase in force duration (e.g., CT was 1.4 ± 0.4 times initial). Differences in twitch summation between units, when two pulses were delivered, may depend on differences in series compliance. This predicts that "doublet" force enhancement would be greatest for units with low twitch/tetanus force ratios, as was found here for thenar units. A low twitch/tetanus force ratio would be expected for units that are "on slack," i.e., at short length in relation to their range of motion. The ten-fold range of twitch/tetanus force ratios reported here, 0.03-0.31, suggests that different units have a correspondingly wide range of functional intrinsic series compliance with the hand in the position adopted in the present experiments.
Differences in resting tension among individual motor units may have
contributed to the wide range of twitch/tetanus force ratios, despite
the precautions to make all measurements at a standard overall muscle
length (see METHODS). The weaker units may thus have been
"slacker" than those generating stronger forces. Thomas et al.
(1991b) found that thenar units with weaker tetanic forces tended to
exert their force preferentially in the direction of flexion.
In addition to stretch of passive series compliance as discussed above,
"doublet" force enhancement may also be explained by increased
Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum
because, in cat muscles, dantrolene sodium abolished part of
the short interval force enhancement (Parmiggiani and Stein
1981). Indeed, twitch force and its time integral are also
determined by the duration and amount of actomyosin cross-bridge
binding ("active state"; Hill 1949
), which in turn are related to
the amount of calcium released from the sarcoplasmic reticulum per
impulse and the time course of its reuptake.
The possibility that the additional force increment came from recruitment of inactive muscle fibers is unlikely because, for intervals of 10 ms or longer, both EMG potentials had similar shapes. For 5 ms intervals, unit EMG potentials began to merge but without force decrements.
Potentiation
The potentiation of twitch forces observed during these
experiments was similar to that reported previously for human thenar motor units (Thomas et al. 1990), and motor units in
other human muscles (Nordstrom and Miles 1990
;
Stephens and Usherwood 1977
; Young and Mayer
1981
). Units with weak twitch forces and low twitch/tetanus force ratios potentiated most and were those from which a "doublet" elicited the greatest twitch force summation. Because the sequence in
which stimuli were delivered was not randomized, we assume that the
influence of potentiation on the magnitude of twitch summation was
cumulative. However, it seems unlikely that twitch potentiation played
a major role in twitch force summation induced by "doublets." The
twitch forces gradually increased during the entire interval test but
not by more than 1.5 times the initial values, whereas the mean
"doublet" force was already 3.5 times single twitch forces in run
1. Furthermore, the "doublet" force did not show any signs of
potentiation between runs 1 and 2.
Optimal patterns of stimulation following the "doublets"
Our results show that an initial "doublet" increased the force
three to four times that of the single twitch. After the subsequent five optimal interpulse intervals, the force generated was at near-maximum levels (92 ± 11% maximal tetanic force, Fig.
6B). In contrast, if shocks were applied to human thenar
motor units at a constant rate (nonoptimal intervals), it may take up
to 20 pulses delivered at 30-100 Hz before maximum tetanic force is reached (Thomas et al. 1991a). Thus when a unit is
recruited with a "doublet" it generates force more quickly,
primarily by reducing the effect of series compliance (Fig.
6A). Furthermore, that the interpulse periods of the
post-"doublet" stimuli required to provide near-maximal force
output were rather uncritical (5-55 ms) suggests that the irregular
rates at which motor units often fire during voluntary contractions do
not necessarily compromise force generation. Irregular motor unit
firing rates are common during fatigue, for example, (Griffin et
al. 1998
) or after spinal cord injury (Thomas and
Kozhina 1999
).
Numerous studies have noted the occurrence of doublet's at the onset
of human voluntary contractions (Bawa and Calancie 1983; Denslow 1948
; Desmedt and Godaux
1977
; Kudina and Alexeeva 1992
), in animal
muscles contracting in response to reflex drive (Cordo and Rymer
1982
), during decerebrate cat locomotion (Hoffer et al.
1981
; Zajac and Young 1980b
), under conditions
of both normal and pathological tremor (Elek et al.
1991
; Freund 1983
), and during spasms of
paralyzed muscle (Thomas and Ross 1997
). Macefield et al. (1996)
assessed the influence of an initial 10 ms "doublet" on
the force-frequency relationship for single human toe extensor units
when trains of pulses were applied at different constant frequencies
(2-100 Hz). They found that such "doublets" effectively elevated
the force at low stimulation rates (e.g., 2 to 10 Hz) but caused little
force change when delivered during pulse-trains of 20 Hz or above. Thus
a "doublet" fired by a motoneuron probably has little effect on
force when it occurs during the course of long-lasting, relatively
strong contractions. It is most effective at contraction onset when
firing rates are low or when the motor unit is engaged in brief
actions. Indeed, even at the lowest stimulus rates, the force increment
generated by a "doublet" typically disappears within 1-2 s
(Macefield et al. 1996
).
General considerations
The results reported here demonstrate that a brief initial
interpulse interval (5-15 ms) is required to elicit maximum
"doublet" force from human thenar motor units and that near-maximal
tetanic forces can be elicited by only five or six additional
post-"doublet" pulses if appropriately spaced in time. Furthermore,
the rate at which these post-"doublet" stimuli must be provided to
human thenar motor units for near maximal force is fairly uncritical. Hence, if trains of pulses that start with a "doublet" were used in
functional electrical stimulation of impaired or paralyzed muscle,
rather than the more usual constant frequency trains, this may markedly
reduce the risk of fatigue due to transmission failure at the
neuromuscular junction and/or within the t-tubular system
(Binder-Macleod and Barker 1991; Binder-Macleod
et al. 1997
). Minimizing the number of pulses would also reduce
the overall metabolic load of the neuromuscular system during motor actions.
It is noteworthy that maximum force-time integrals were recorded when
most post-"doublet" interpulse intervals were about 140 ms (i.e.,
runs 3-6), which corresponds to a motoneuronal firing rate of 7 Hz.
This rate is close to the minimum rate at which motor units are
recruited and it is similar to the rate used to maintain weak voluntary
contractions (Monster and Chan 1977; Tanji and
Kato 1973a
,b
). Thus, if preceded by a "doublet," these low rates would make the human thenar muscles contract with maximum efficiency even when activated at their minimum rates. Moreover, the
similarity between the optimal interpulse patterns described here, in
animal studies, and those recorded from muscles or nerves during
naturally elicited contractions, suggests that the nervous system
indeed uses these advantageous pulse-patterns.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
The authors thank G. Westling and L. Bäckström for help during the experiments.
This work was supported by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grants NS-30226 to C. K. Thomas and NS-14756 to B. Bigland-Ritchie, and by Medical Research Council of Sweden Project 08667 to R. S. Johansson.
![]() |
FOOTNOTES |
---|
Address for reprint requests: C. K. Thomas, The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami School of Medicine, P.O. Box 016960 (R48), 1600 NW 10th Ave., R-48, Miami, FL 33101-9844.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 18 May 1999; accepted in final form 30 August 1999.
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|