Neurobiology Program, Department of Biological Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 45701
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
DiCaprio, Ralph A. Gating of afferent input by a central pattern generator. Intracellular recordings from the sole proprioceptor (the oval organ) in the crab ventilatory system show that the nonspiking afferent fibers from this organ receive a cyclic hyperpolarizing inhibition in phase with the ventilatory motor pattern. Although depolarizing and hyperpolarizing current pulses injected into a single afferent will reset the ventilatory motor pattern, the inhibitory input is of sufficient magnitude to block afferent input to the ventilatory central pattern generator (CPG) for ~50% of the cycle period. It is proposed that this inhibitory input serves to gate sensory input to the ventilatory CPG to provide an unambiguous input to the ventilatory CPG.
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Centrally patterned motor behavior in the absence
of sensory input is a ubiquitous feature of the organization of
rhythmic motor systems (Delcomyn 1980). However,
sensory input to central pattern generator (CPG) networks is
often required for the production of behaviorally appropriate motor
patterns (Pearson 1993
). In addition, modulation of
sensory input to CPGs is observed in a wide variety of motor systems
either directly or by acting on interneurons in the system
(Pearson 1993
; Prochazka 1989
). Direct modulation of primary afferents in vertebrate and invertebrate systems
is usually associated with primary afferent depolarization (PAD), which
modulates transmitter release by the shunting conductance activated by
the presynaptic input (Rudomin et al. 1993
). In many systems PAD is correlated with the production of a rhythmic motor pattern to modulate reflexes during ongoing motor activity (El Manira et al. 1991
; Paul 1989
; Sillar and
Skorupski 1986
). This study describes the complete gating of
primary afferent input by direct cyclic inhibition by the ventilatory
CPG in the crab.
Gill ventilation in decapod crustacea is produced by the rhythmic
dorso-ventral movements of the scaphognathite (SG) or gill bailer of
the second maxilla. Rhythmic movement of the SG pumps water through the
branchial chamber in either of two directions (forward or reverse
ventilation) determined by the recruitment sequence of levator and
depressor motor neuron subgroups, although forward pumping is the
prevalent mode in Carcinus maenas (Wilkens 1976). The motor pattern controlling the left and right SGs is produced by independent CPGs (Mendelson 1971
;
Wilkens and Young 1975
), each consisting of eight
nonspiking interneurons (DiCaprio 1989
).
The only proprioceptor in the SG is the oval organ, which is located
adjacent to the SG flexion axis (Pasztor 1969). The oval organ is innervated by three afferent neurons with cell bodies located
in the thoracic ganglion. In the lobster these afferents employ a dual
mode of information transmission, that is, they generate action
potentials but also decrementally propagate membrane potential changes
to the CNS because of their large length constant of ~1 cm
(Pasztor and Bush 1982
). In the shore crab, however, the
oval organ afferents do not generate action potentials and therefore
signal only by decremental conduction to the thoracic ganglion. The SG
is also extensively invested with innervated hairs and hooked sensilla.
Extracellular stimulation of this population of afferents has been
shown to reset, entrain, and, in the case of tonic stimulation, to
increase the rate of the ventilatory rhythm to near physiological
maximum rates (Wilkens 1994
; Wilkens and DiCaprio
1994
).
![]() |
METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Male and female green shore crabs, C. maenas, were
used in all experiments. The isolated ganglion preparation used in this study was described in detail elsewhere (DiCaprio and Fourtner 1984; Simmers and Bush 1983
). The walking legs
and chelea were autotomized, and the dorsal carapace, viscera, and
brain were removed. The sternal artery was immediately cannulated, and
the thoracic ganglion was perfused with chilled oxygenated saline. The
nerves to both SGs were dissected from the SG musculature, all
remaining nerves from the thoracic ganglion were severed, and the
thoracic ganglion was removed and pinned to a sloping Sylgard base. The
ganglionic sheath above the ventilatory neuropil was removed with fine
forceps to permit intracellular recording.
Extracellular recordings of the ventilatory motor pattern from SG levator and depressor motor nerves were made with polyethelyene suction electrodes. Recordings from the levator nerve were usually made proximal to the branch of this nerve, which innervates depressor muscle D2a, thereby allowing the combined recording of activity in axons innervating muscle D2a along with levator motor neuron activity. Intracellular recordings from ventilatory neurons were made in the neuropil with Lucifer yellow-filled microelectrodes amplified with a bridge electrometer (WPI 767). All signals were recorded on an eight-channel instrumentation tape recorder (HP model 3968A) for later reproduction and analysis.
Oval organ afferents were penetrated in the ventilatory neuropil and
were identified by their distinctive morphology and physiology. Oval
organ afferents were distinguished from motor neurons based on the
following criteria: initial penetration of a cell did not evoke action
potentials because of injury on penetration or with the injection of
depolarizing current, on release from hyperpolarization, when
depolarized after an initial period of hyperpolarization or when the SG
motor nerves were stimulated extracellularly. In contrast,
intracellular recordings from motor neurons produce action potentials
in phase with the ventilatory rhythm, with the injection of small
(0.2-0.5 nA) depolarizing currents or when stimulated antidromically
from the appropriate motor nerve. The Lucifer yellow fills of the
afferents revealed a central cell body located on the dorsolateral
surface of the ventilatory neuropil and a large diameter (35-50 µm)
axon exiting the ganglion via the levator nerve and running in the
branch known to contain these afferents (Pasztor 1969).
The three oval organ afferents have essentially identical central
morphologies and therefore cannot be individually identified, and the
physiological results presented here are typical of all intracellular
recordings from single afferents.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In the absence of CPG activity, the resting potential of oval
organ afferents was 55 ± 4.2 mV (n = 16). The
membrane potential was stable during pauses in ventilation, and no
discrete postsynaptic potentials (PSPs) were observed in the cell (Fig.
1A) either spontaneously or
when levator and depressor motor nerves were stimulated antidromically. During the expression of the forward ventilation motor pattern, the
membrane potential of the neuron oscillated in phase with the
ventilatory motor output and was hyperpolarized with respect to the
resting membrane potential. The amplitude of the oscillation was
22 ± 3.5 mV (n = 16). The inhibitory nature of
this oscillation was confirmed by observing the decrease in
peak-to-peak amplitude of the oscillation during the injection of
hyperpolarizing current with a reversal potential of approximately
78
mV. In addition, the input resistance of the neuron decreased by
~30% during the hyperpolarized phase as determined by the injection
of brief hyperpolarizing (0.5 nA, 30 ms) current pulses.
|
When the ventilatory motor output transiently switched from forward to
reverse ventilation, the oscillation in the membrane potential of the
afferent continued in phase with the motor output and remained
coincident with the D1 depressor motor neuron burst (Fig.
1B). There was a small depolarizing DC shift in the
oscillation of 2-3 mV, and the peak-to-peak amplitude of the membrane
potential oscillation initially increased relative to the magnitude of
the oscillation observed during forward ventilation and then steadily decreased to the initial level during the reverse interval. In some
recordings discrete PSPs could be resolved on the depolarizing phase of
the oscillation during reversed ventilation. The origin of these PSPs
is not known, but they were not correlated with any motor neuron spikes
occurring during the depressor burst and may arise from the interneuron
(RSi) that mediates the switch from forward to reverse ventilation
(DiCaprio 1990).
The ability of input from an oval organ afferent to perturb the ventilatory rhythm was assessed by compiling a phase response curve that describes the phase shift in the motor output pattern caused by the injection of brief current pulses into the afferent at different phases of the ventilatory cycle (Fig. 2). Depolarizing or hyperpolarizing pulses at amplitudes of up to 6 nA applied during the portion of the cycle when the neuron was hyperpolarized (phase range of 0.5-0.95) had no effect on the timing of the motor pattern. Depolarizing pulses (open triangles) injected early in the cycle (beginning of the depressor burst) caused a phase advance that decreased in magnitude with increasing stimulus phase until an increasing phase delay was evoked at a stimulus phase greater than 0.25. Hyperpolarizing pulses (Fig. 2, filled circles) caused a large phase delay when applied early in the cycle, which abruptly switched to a large phase advance at a stimulus phase of 0.15, which decreased in magnitude as stimulus phase was increased. The ability of hyperpolarizing pulses to reset the rhythm and the relatively depolarized value of their resting membrane potential indicate that these afferents are probably continuously releasing transmitter. Maintained depolarization of a single afferent stopped the motor pattern, although tonic activity persisted in some depressor motor neurons (Fig. 3A), which mimics the effect of restraining the SG in a maximally levated or depressed position (not shown). Injection of sustained hyperpolarizing current resulted in a slight increase in cycle frequency accompanied by a decrease in the burst duration of some D1 group motor neurons (Fig. 3B).
|
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Sensory input from the oval organ in the crab ventilatory
system is likely to be blocked (gated) for ~50% of the ventilatory cycle by a phasic hyperpolarizing inhibitory input to the oval organ
afferents derived from the ventilatory CPG. In contrast, presynaptic
input to primary afferents (PAD) in vertebrate and invertebrate systems
is usually modulatory in nature, whereas in rhythmic systems PAD is
correlated with the production of a rhythmic motor pattern to modulate
reflexes during ongoing motor activity (El Manira et al.
1991; Paul 1989
; Sillar and Skorupski 1986
; Wolf and Burrows 1995
).
The nature of the oval organ input to the ventilatory CPG and its role in the production of the motor pattern are as yet unclear. It proved to be extremely difficult to obtain intracellular recordings from these cells during ventilatory movements, and extracellular recordings are ineffective as these neurons are nonspiking in the crab. In addition, it was not possible to record from any ventilatory neurons in a preparation that maintains the integrity of the pumping chamber and permits the normal development of a pressure differential across the branchial chamber.
The oval organ consists of a network of connective tissue strands
and associated nerve endings located within the hemocoel of the second
maxilla, spanning a narrow gap between the E2 endite and
the arthrodial membrane in the region of maximum flexion and extension
at the base of the SG. The oval organ is likely to be excited by SG
movement and/or by the stress produced at the base of the SG during the
development of negative pressure pulses by the ventilatory pump
(Pasztor 1969). Excitation of oval organ afferents may
occur twice during the ventilatory cycle as imposed movement of the SG
in the lobster elicits action potentials from the afferents during
levation and depression of the SG (Pasztor 1969
).
Recordings of the pressure in the branchial chambers of an intact crab
show that there are two negative pressure pulses present during each
ventilatory cycle (Hughes et al. 1969
). Although the
precise position of these pulses with respect to the motor output is
unknown, correlation of these recordings with the data on blade
movement and motor pattern (Young 1975
) indicates that only one pressure pulse would fall within the period of the cycle where
afferent input would be effective. The cyclic inhibitory input to the
oval organ afferents restricts effective sensory input to one phase of
the motor pattern and may thus transform an otherwise ambiguous twice
per cycle sensory input to a signal linked to the motor pattern
produced by the ventilatory CPG.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
The author thanks Drs. Sasha Zill and Scott Hooper for reading a preliminary draft of the manuscript and for helpful comments and discussion.
This work was supported by a grant from the Whitehall Foundation.
![]() |
FOOTNOTES |
---|
Address for reprint requests: Dept. of Biological Sciences, Ohio University, Irvine Hall, Athens, OH 45701.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 22 July 1998; accepted in final form October 1998.
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|