1Institut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Universität Leipzig, D04107 Leipzig, Germany; and 2Neuroscience Program and Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver 80262 and Veterans Affairs Medical Research Service, Denver, Colorado 80220
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Thümmler, Susanne and
Thomas V. Dunwiddie.
Adenosine Receptor Antagonists Induce Persistent Bursting in the
Rat Hippocampal CA3 Region Via an NMDA Receptor-Dependent Mechanism.
J. Neurophysiol. 83: 1787-1795, 2000.
Adenosine receptor antagonists initiate repetitive bursting
activity in the CA3 region of hippocampal slices. Although some studies
have suggested that this effect is irreversible, this has been
difficult to establish because many adenosine antagonists wash out of
brain slices extremely slowly. Furthermore the cellular mechanism that
underlies persistent bursting is unknown. To resolve these issues, we
studied the effects of nonselective (8-p-sulfophenyltheophylline, 8SPT, 50-100 µM), Al-selective
(8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine, 100 nM; xanthine carboxylic acid
congener, 200 nM), and A2A-selective (chlorostyryl-caffeine; 200 nM) adenosine antagonists in the CA3 region
of rat hippocampal slices using extracellular recording. Superfusion
with all of the adenosine antagonists except chlorostyryl-caffeine induced bursting, and the burst frequency after 30 min drug superfusion did not differ for the different antagonists. Most slices showed a
period of rapid initial bursting, followed either by stable bursting at
a lower frequency or a pattern of oscillating burst frequency. In
either case, the bursting continued after drug washout. Virtually
identical patterns of long-term bursting activity were observed when
8SPT was washed out or applied continuously. Control experiments using
exogenous adenosine to characterize the persistence of 8SPT in tissue
demonstrated >95% washout at 60 min, a time when nearly all slices
still showed regular bursting activity. When the
N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists
DL2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (AP5; 50 µM) or
dizocilpine (10 µM) were applied before and during 8SPT superfusion,
bursting occurred in the presence of the NMDA antagonists but did not
persist once the 8SPT was washed out. AP5 had no effect on
persistent bursting when applied after the initiation of spiking. The
selective calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase
inhibitor
1-[N,O-bis-(5-isoquinolinesulfonyl)-N-methyl-L-tyrosyl]-4-phenylpiperazine (KN-62; 3 µM), which has been shown to block NMDA receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity in the CA1 region, also significantly decreased the
long-term effect of 8SPT. Thus adenosine antagonists initiate persistent spiking in the CA3 region; this activity does not depend on
continued occupation of adenosine receptors by antagonists, and can be
blocked by treatments that prevent NMDA receptor-dependent plasticity.
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Adenosine is a neuromodulator that has a largely depressant effect on neuronal activity in the CNS, and there is abundant evidence that there is a basal level of extracellular adenosine in the brain that exerts a tonic inhibitory effect on neuronal activity. The stimulatory effects of competitive antagonists of adenosine receptors such as caffeine and theophylline have been linked to the reversal of this tonic inhibitory effect.
Blockade of adenosine receptors with competitive antagonists produces
at least three different types of effects in hippocampal neurons.
First, there is an increase in the amplitude of synaptic responses at
glutamatergic synapses such as the Schaffer collateral and commissural
inputs to the CA1 region, which are tonically inhibited by presynaptic
A1 receptors (Dunwiddie and Hoffer
1980). Second, there is a depolarization of the resting
membrane potential, usually accompanied by an increase in input
resistance, which corresponds to the closing of G-protein-coupled
K+ channels that are activated tonically by
postsynaptic A1 receptors (Alzheimer et
al. 1993
). Finally, antagonists can induce epileptiform activity, usually in the form of spontaneous bursting that appears to
originate in the CA3 region (Alzheimer et al. 1989
;
Ault and Wang 1986
; Ault et al. 1987
);
adenosine antagonists also increase the rate of spontaneous bursting
induced by other agents such as bicuculline (Ault and Wang
1986
; Dunwiddie 1980
). Although the first two of
these effects (the increase in glutamatergic synaptic responses, and
the depolarization of the resting membrane potential) appear to be
fully reversible, there are several reports that the bursting induced
by adenosine receptor antagonism is irreversible, i.e., that once
initiated, it persists after the washout of the antagonist
(Alzheimer et al. 1989
; Ault et al. 1987
;
Chesi and Stone 1997
). It is unclear why most of the
effects of antagonists are reversible, but the induction of
epileptiform bursting is not. This issue is complicated by the fact
that the agents that are most effective in inducing persistent
bursting, such as 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), have
subnanomolar affinities for the A1 receptor and
wash out of the tissue very slowly. Thus it has been difficult to
exclude the possibility that the persistent bursting simply reflects
the continued presence of low concentrations of antagonist. This
possibility receives further support from the observation that
theophylline, which washes out of slices relatively quickly, initiates
bursting that terminates promptly on washout (Ault and Wang
1986
; Chesi and Stone 1997
; but see Ault
et al. 1987
). Determining the mechanism underlying persistent
effects has been complicated further by inconsistencies in the
literature. These are likely to reflect differences in important
experimental variables related to interictal bursting, such as the use
of different species (guinea pig, rat), different
Ca2+, Mg2+, and
K+ concentrations in the medium, and the
application of various adenosine antagonists over different time periods.
At present, at least three potential explanations have been proposed to
account for the persistent bursting induced by some adenosine receptor
antagonists and not others. The continued presence of low
concentrations of lipophilic antagonists in the tissue due to limited
drug washout might account for persistent effects; alternatively,
selective A1 receptor antagonists such as DPCPX might induce irreversible effects, whereas antagonists such as theophylline that do not show selectivity for
A1/A2 receptors do not, or blockade
of adenosine receptors could under some conditions activate a
second-messenger-mediated mechanism that leads to continued bursting.
In terms of this last mechanism, previous studies have shown that a
brief period of bursting induced by agents that do not interact with
adenosine receptors can sometimes become persistent, reflecting the
initiation of an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)
receptor-dependent form of plasticity (Schneiderman et al.
1994). The present experiments were designed to examine this
latter possibility, and to determine whether such a mechanism could
explain the previously reported persistency of bursting induced by
adenosine receptor antagonists.
![]() |
METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Male Sprague Dawley rats from 4 to 7 wk old were used for all
experiments. Housing and treatment of all animals were in accordance with animal welfare protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care
And Use Committee. Animals were decapitated, and a Vibratome (Ted
Pella) was used to prepare 400-µm-thick coronal slices of hippocampus. The slices were incubated in artificial cerebral fluid
(ACSF) containing (in mM): 126 NaCl, 3.0 KCl, 1.5 MgCl2, 2.4 CaCl2, 1.2 NaH2PO4, 11 glucose, and 25.9 NaHCO3 saturated with 95% O2-5%
CO2 and kept at 31-33°C for 1 h before experimentation.
Slices then were transferred to a recording chamber maintained at 31-33°C and were superfused continuously at a rate of 2 ml/min with ACSF containing (in mM): 126 NaCl, 3.3 KCl, 0.9 MgCl2, 1.3 CaCl2, 1.2 NaH2PO4, 11 glucose, and 25.9 NaHCO3. As in previous studies, this latter solution was used during experiments because spontaneous bursting rarely occurs in media containing the higher concentrations of divalent cations found in our normal ACSF. Extracellular recordings were made using glass pipettes pulled on a Flaming/Brown electrode puller (Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA) filled with 3 M NaCl. For recording spontaneous bursts, the recording electrode was placed under visual guidance in the stratum pyramidale of the CA3 region. A twisted polar nichrome wire electrode was placed as stimulation electrode in s. radiatum of CA3, and the placements of the electrodes were adjusted so that large-amplitude population spikes could be recorded as an indication of slice viability and proper electrode positioning. The placement of the recording electrode remained unchanged for the duration of the experiment. Individual bursts were detected with a window discriminator, which was used to trigger data acquisition on a computer-based analysis program. For display and analysis purposes, the instantaneous burst frequency was defined as the reciprocal of the time since the preceding burst (i.e., a 2-s interburst interval would correspond to a frequency of 0.5 Hz). The average of all the frequencies during each 5-min period of time was averaged and used for subsequent analysis of changes in burst rate. For recordings of field excitatory postsynaptic potential (fEPSP) responses, the recording electrode was placed in s. radiatum of the CA1 region and the stimulation electrode in s. radiatum near the border of the CA1 and CA2 regions; stimuli were delivered at 15-s intervals. For delivery of drug solutions, stock solutions were made at 50-200 times the desired final concentration of drug, and a calibrated syringe pump (Razel) was used to add drugs directly to the superfusion system. In no case was the perfusion speed increased by >1% by drug addition.
All electrophysiological responses were recorded to computer disk for
later analysis using software developed in our laboratory. Data were
analyzed subsequently with Microsoft Excel and GraphPad Prism.
Statistical analyses of drug effects were performed using the
two-tailed unpaired or paired Student's t-test with a
P < 0.05 criterion for statistical significance,
and the 2 or Fisher's exact test were used for analysis
of the proportion of slices showing bursting activity under different
conditions. All summary data are reported as the means ± SE.
Adenosine and DL
2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (AP5)
were purchased from Sigma. 8-(p-sulfophenyl)theophylline
(8SPT), dizocilpine hydrogen maleate, and
8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX) were purchased from Research
Biochemicals International, and
1-[N,O-bis-(5-isoquinolinesulfonyl)-N-methyl-L-tyrosyl]-4-phenylpiperazine (KN-62) was purchased from Calbiochem. Xanthine carboxylic acid congener (8-[4-[(carboxymethyl)oxy]phenyl]-1,3-dipropylxanthine; XCC) was kindly provided by Dr. Kenneth A. Jacobson (Jacobson et
al. 1986
).
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Adenosine A1 receptor antagonists induce bursting in the CA3 region of rat hippocampus
Previous studies have reported that both nonselective
(theophylline) (Ault and Wang 1986; Chesi and
Stone 1997
) and selective A1 receptor
antagonists (DPCPX) (Alzheimer et al. 1989
, 1993
; but
see Chesi and Stone 1997
) induce repetitive bursting in
the CA3 region of rat and guinea pig hippocampal slices. Because some of the differences in the results of these studies might be related to
differing pharmacological specificities of the antagonists, in initial
experiments we compared the effects of four adenosine receptor
antagonists with varying receptor selectivity (Table 1) on bursting activity in rat
hippocampal slices. We previously have found that DPCPX and the closely
related cyclopentyl-theophylline require
30 min of superfusion to
achieve equilibrium concentrations in hippocampal slices
(Dunwiddie and Diao 1994
; T. V. Dunwiddie and L. Diao, unpublished results); therefore all slices were superfused with
antagonists for a minimum of 30 min. Of a total of 158 slices tested,
27/158 (17%) showed spontaneous bursts without any prior drug
application and were subsequently not tested. In 74/131 (56%) slices,
bursts were induced with DPCPX, 8SPT, or XCC, and in 57/131 (44%), no
bursts could be induced with these antagonists. When tested alone, the
nonselective antagonist 8SPT induced spiking in 32/54 (59%) slices; it
was tested at both 50 and 100 µM with similar results (Table
2). The A1 receptor-selective
antagonist DPCPX and XCC induced bursting in approximately the same
percentage of slices as was observed with 8SPT, but the
A2A-selective antagonist chlorostyryl-caffeine (CSC) did
not induce spiking (0/7 slices). CSC also did not appear to either
inhibit or enhance the bursting induced by 100 µM 8SPT (Table 2)
because the latency to onset and frequency of bursting in slices
pretreated with CSC and then tested with 8SPT was virtually identical
to what was seen in control slices. Thus these results confirm the
conclusion suggested by previous studies (Alzheimer et al.
1993
; Chesi and Stone 1997
) that displacement of
endogenous adenosine from A1 receptors is necessary and
sufficient to initiate bursting. The similarity of the effects of the
A1-selective antagonists and 8SPT and the lack of effects
of CSC suggest that A2A receptors do not modulate this
activity.
|
|
Although all of the effective antagonists induced bursting in a
qualitatively similar manner, the bursting induced by both concentrations of 8SPT occurred with a shorter mean latency than was
observed with either XCC or DPCPX. On the basis of concentration and
potency, a much more rapid response to DPCPX (~200 times its Ki for the A1 receptor) relative
to 8SPT (~20 times its Ki) might have been
predicted, when in fact the opposite was observed (i.e., the response
to 8SPT was significantly faster; P < 0.001). This suggests that the latency to the onset of spiking with these agents is
more closely related to their physical properties (i.e., rate of
diffusion into the brain slice) rather than interactions with the
receptor, as has been noted in previous studies with these and other
closely related antagonists (Dunwiddie and Diao 1994). Because 8SPT is much more water soluble than DPCPX, it diffuses into
(and out of) the slice readily, whereas the diffusion of a
lipid-soluble antagonist such as DPCPX may be retarded because it is
essentially trapped by partitioning into cell membranes. Because XCC is
somewhat more water soluble (i.e., less lipophilic) than DPCPX, it was
hypothesized that it would wash into and out of slices more quickly
than DPCPX; although there was a nonsignificant trend in this
direction, the latency to onset of bursting with XCC was still slower
than for 8SPT. In subsequent experiments, the more-water-soluble 8SPT
was used because, in contrast to the selective A1
antagonists, it could be washed in and out of brain slices relatively
quickly. In addition, 8SPT normally is charged in aqueous solution and
cannot cross cell membranes. Thus unlike the other antagonists, its
effects must reflect actions at extracellular receptors, presumably for
adenosine, and cannot involve actions at intracellular sites, such as
inhibition of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase.
The most common pattern of activity elicited by all of the antagonists was an initial peak in the rate of spontaneous bursting that occurred within the first few minutes of bursting, followed by a rapid decline in rate to a relatively stable level that was maintained throughout the period of drug superfusion (Figs. 1, A and C, 2A, and 5A). Once stable bursting was attained, the amplitude and duration of the bursts usually did not change markedly (Figs. 1, B and D, and 5B), but the frequency sometimes declined slowly over the course of the experiment. In the slices that showed stable bursting, the frequency of bursting during the period from 25 to 30 min after the onset of superfusion with the antagonists was not significantly different for any of the antagonists tested, and ranged from ~0.15 to 0.2 Hz (Table 2). Thus all of the antagonists with substantial affinity for the A1 receptor induced repetitive bursting in approximately the same fraction of slices, and their adenosine receptor selectivity or nonselectivity did not appear to affect the incidence or characteristics of the bursting.
|
In ~15% of the slices, the pattern of bursting did not reach a stable level, but showed regular oscillations in the frequency of bursting (Figs. 2B and 6). The mean period of these oscillations was 4.4 ± 0.44 min, and in most cases, the amplitude of these oscillations declined over time. The occurrence of these oscillations did not appear to be related to the antagonist used to induce the bursting and was seen with each of the effective antagonists. Extreme oscillations in frequency were observed in 2/74 slices (e.g., Fig. 2C); in these slices, the burst frequency was taken to be the frequency of baseline activity before and after the episodes of high-frequency bursting.
|
Persistence of repetitive bursting
As has been reported in previous studies (Alzheimer et al.
1989, 1993
), bursting induced by DPCPX was essentially
irreversible (>1 h with minimal decrement) even with extended washing.
However, demonstrating washout of DPCPX is problematic because it is
highly lipid soluble and equilibrates very slowly with brain slices. Furthermore the issue was complicated by the fact that the rate of
bursting decreased over long periods of time (Fig. 1A) (see also Alzheimer et al. 1989
, Fig. 1), and it was unclear
whether this was due to slow washout of drug or to changes in the
intrinsic rate of bursting that were independent of the presence of the antagonist in the slice. To resolve these issues, we characterized the
persistent effects of 8SPT, which washes in and out of tissue more
quickly than DPCPX, and used two approaches to demonstrate that the
persistent bursting was not due to the continued presence of 8SPT in
the slices. First, the rate at which 8SPT washed out of slices was
determined experimentally. In this protocol (illustrated in Fig.
3A), the presence of 8SPT in
the slice was inferred based on its ability to antagonize the effects
of a low concentration of adenosine (20 µM) on the fEPSP response
evoked by synaptic stimulation. Slices were superfused with 8SPT for 30 min, and the subsequent washout of 8SPT was monitored by the return of the synaptic response to its inhibited baseline (Fig. 3A).
After 60 min of 8SPT washout (in the continued presence of adenosine), the fEPSP amplitude returned to the original baseline (Fig.
3B), suggesting that 8SPT washout was complete within this
time period. The actual time course of the washout of 8SPT is
illustrated in Fig. 4 and confirms that
there is no significant effect of 8SPT after 1 h of washout. In a
second set of experiments, the repetitive bursting was compared in a
group of slices that was superfused with 100 µM 8SPT for 30 min,
followed by drug washout, and in a second group that was superfused
continuously with 8SPT throughout the experiment. The results for both
groups were virtually identical (Fig. 4), which suggested that the
decline in bursting observed during a 60-min washout period was
unrelated to washout because it occurred to a similar extent in slices
continuously superfused with drug. These data confirm the conclusion of
a previous study (Alzheimer et al. 1989
) that
persistence of antagonist (in this case 8SPT) was not responsible for
the continued bursting in slices treated with adenosine receptor
antagonists.
|
|
Cellular mechanism underlying persistent bursting
The preceding experiments demonstrated that the persistent
bursting induced by adenosine receptor antagonists was not simply due
to the persistence of the antagonist in the tissue. An alternative possibility was that the repetitive bursting was self-sustaining, i.e.,
that once initiated, it was maintained (perhaps by recurrent synaptic
pathways) until it was inhibited actively. To determine whether this
was the case, persistent bursting was initiated by 8SPT followed by
washout, at which point slices then were superfused with adenosine,
which has been shown to block spiking induced by other agents
(Ault and Wang 1986; Dunwiddie 1980
). In
a group of four slices superfused with 100 µM 8SPT, 40 µM adenosine
was added for 15 min after 30 min of 8SPT washout. Adenosine almost immediately terminated bursting (mean latency 1.3 min; Fig.
5A), but the bursting resumed
shortly after adenosine washout (mean latency 2.6 min), and the rate
and pattern of the bursts were almost identical to what had been
observed prior to adenosine superfusion (Fig. 5). Thus inhibition of
the bursting per se only transiently affected this pattern of activity.
|
A recent study has demonstrated that repetitive bursting in the CA3
region leads to an long-term potentiation (LTP)-like potentiation of
feed-forward excitatory synaptic connections in this area (Bains et al. 1999). Thus we examined the hypothesis that an NMDA
receptor-dependent form of plasticity was responsible for induction of
the persistent bursting. In initial experiments, we characterized the
effect of the competitive NMDA receptor antagonist AP5, and the
noncompetitive antagonist dizocilpine, on 8SPT-induced bursting. The
antagonists were applied by superfusion beginning 10 (AP5) or 20 min
(dizocilpine) before 8SPT superfusion. The presence of NMDA antagonists
during 8SPT superfusion did not affect the latency to onset of
bursting, which if anything was reduced slightly when compared with
slices superfused with 100 µM 8SPT alone (Table
3). The antagonists typically did not
affect the initial pattern of bursting (Fig. 6), but there was a modest reduction in
the rate of bursting that was observed after 30 min of superfusion with
the NMDA antagonists +8SPT (Table 3), which was statistically
significant for the 25 µM AP5 group (P < 0.05; Table
3). The reduction in rate was due at least in part to the fact that in
several slices, bursting began shortly after the onset of 8SPT
superfusion but was not maintained for the full 30 min of antagonist
superfusion (e.g., Fig. 6B). Nevertheless, the most apparent
effect of the NMDA receptor antagonists was that they completely
blocked the persistent spiking after washout of 8SPT in every slice
tested. This was observed in 6/6 slices treated with 25 µM AP5, 4/4
slices with 50 µM AP5, and 4/4 slices with 10 µM dizocilpine. This
was not simply due to a prolonged reduction in excitability after AP5
treatment because when two slices were treated for a second time with
8SPT after washout of 50 µM AP5, both showed normal bursting activity
(Fig. 6A). It was also apparent that once the persistent
spiking was initiated, it was no longer inhibited by AP5; in 4/4 slices
treated with 50 µM AP5 after washout of 8SPT, there was no effect on
the frequency of the bursting (Fig. 6C). Thus NMDA receptor
antagonists blocked the establishment of persistent spiking activity,
but only if they were present during the 8SPT superfusion.
|
|
The observation that NMDA receptor antagonists reduced the
frequency of bursting even while the 8SPT was present suggested that
they could be blocking the persistent effect by inhibiting the
magnitude and/or frequency of bursts, which in turn reduced the
probability of inducing the long-term plasticity through a non-NMDA
receptor-dependent mechanism. To rule out this possibility, we examined
the effects of a protein kinase inhibitor that has been reported to
block NMDA receptor-dependent LTP in the CA1 region but that does not
appear to interact directly with NMDA receptors. KN-62 is a selective
inhibitor of rat brain Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent
protein kinase II that acts by binding directly to the calmodulin site
of the enzyme (Tokumitsu et al. 1990). Previous studies
have shown that KN-62 blocks NMDA receptor-dependent forms of LTP
(e.g., in the Schaffer collateral/commissural inputs to the CA1 region)
but does not interfere with NMDA receptor-independent LTP
(Bortolotto and Collingridge 1998
; Ito et al.
1991
). Slices were superfused with 3 µM KN-62 for 20 min
before the treatment with 8SPT (100 µM). Neither the latency to onset
of bursting (3.1 ± 0.72 min) nor the frequency of bursting after
30 min (0.23 ± 0.03 Hz) was significantly different from what was
observed after 8SPT alone. However, 4/6 slices stopped bursting during
the 60-min washout period, and the decline in the mean rate of spiking
was virtually identical to the time course for 8SPT washout as
determined by the preceding experiments with the fEPSP responses. The
mean normalized frequency of spiking in the KN-62 slices after 20 min of 8SPT washout (0.74 ± 0.16, n = 6) was not
significantly different from the 8SPT control slices, but by 40 min was
decreased significantly compared with controls (0.21 ± 0.11;
P < 0.02) and at 60 min had essentially reached
baseline (0.06 ± 0.04; P < 0.001 vs. 8SPT washout). Thus the NMDA receptor antagonists AP5 and dizocilpine, as
well as the Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein
kinase II inhibitor KN-62, significantly inhibited the persistent
spiking induced by 8SPT.
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The results of the present experiments confirm the basic
observations made in most previous studies concerning the persistent effects of adenosine receptor antagonists on repetitive bursting in the
CA3 region. We observed that after superfusion with adenosine antagonists, repetitive bursting occurs that persists well beyond the
termination of superfusion with the antagonist ligand. However, these
experiments also have identified a likely cellular mechanism that is
responsible for the persistence of this bursting. Our results
demonstrate that the persistence of the bursting reflects the
involvement of an LTP-like process, which is dependent both on
activation of NMDA receptors and the activity of a
Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase.
Bains et al. (1999) showed that the repetitive firing of
CA3 pyramidal neurons during bursts induced by high
K+ potentiates the recurrent excitatory
connections between CA3 neurons and proposed that LTP of these synapses
may alter the functional circuitry of this region in such a way that
bursting persists independently of any subsequent experimental
interventions. It appears likely that adenosine receptor antagonists
initiate a similar process, which then continues independently of
occupation of adenosine receptors by the antagonist. Thus what makes
the bursting self-sustaining is not the activity per se (i.e.,
recurrent excitatory activity in the slice), but changes in the
strength of intrinsic hippocampal synapses that increase the
excitability of the CA3 network to the point where periodic bursting
occurs. This hypothesis is supported by the observation that once
persistent bursting was initiated, complete inhibition of such activity
for 10-15 min with adenosine (Fig. 5) only transiently suppressed the
bursting, which recurred immediately upon washout of the adenosine.
In terms of some of the alternative mechanisms that have been proposed
to account for persistent bursting, the present experiments provide
evidence to resolve what have been somewhat controversial issues. A
trivial explanation for the persistence of the bursting, viz., that it
reflects the persistence of the antagonist in the tissue, can be ruled
out as a basis for the persistent effects of 8SPT. We found that normal
responsiveness of A1 receptors to adenosine is
reinstated within an hour after washout of 8SPT (Fig. 3), indicating
that the antagonist no longer occupies the receptors at a time when
bursting is still occurring. However, as has been correctly pointed out
by Chesi and Stone (1997), many adenosine receptor
antagonists, particularly the more potent ones such as DPCPX, are
highly lipophilic compounds that partition into membranes and as such
are very slow to wash out of slices. Antagonists such as DPCPX
dissociate rapidly (within minutes) from A1
receptors, which can be demonstrated by the rapid onset of
adenosine-mediated inhibition induced by adding high concentrations of
adenosine in the presence of DPCPX (Dunwiddie, unpublished data). The
limiting factor in the termination of the effects of antagonists such
as DPCPX in slices (which can be >1 h in some cases) appears to be the
rate at which they leave sites in the membrane and not the rate of
dissociation from the receptors. Thus persistent bursting induced by
agents such as DPCPX could reflect insufficient washout of the
antagonist, a persistent underlying process, or in most cases, both.
Because persistent bursting has been observed consistently with
A1-selective antagonists such as DPCPX
(Alzheimer et al. 1989; Chesi and Stone
1997
), whereas the persistent effect is only sometimes observed
with nonselective antagonists such as theophylline (persistent, Ault et al. 1987
; transient, Ault and Wang
1986
; Chesi and Stone 1997
), it has been
suggested that the effects of A1-selective antagonists are different from nonselective antagonists. However, the
results of the present study do not support this distinction, in that
there was no difference in the incidence of bursting between highly
selective antagonists such as DPCPX, and a relatively nonselective antagonist (8SPT) used in a concentration where both
A1 and A2 receptors would
have been blocked.
The results of the present study suggest that an LTP-like phenomenon
supports the persistent component of bursting induced by adenosine
receptor antagonists. As with NMDA receptor-dependent LTP, persistent
bursting could be blocked by the presence of both competitive (AP5) and
noncompetitive (dizocilpine) NMDA receptor antagonists when they were
present during the initial period of bursting, but once persistent
bursting was initiated, it was no longer sensitive to the antagonists.
In this respect, persistent bursting induced by adenosine antagonists
is similar to both LTP and persistent bursting elicited by other agents
that do not interact with adenosine receptors (Bains et al.
1999; Schneiderman et al. 1994
). As has been
noted previously (Schneiderman et al. 1994
), the
epileptiform bursts appear to be at least partially supported by NMDA
receptor-mediated transmission because NMDA antagonists reduce the
amplitude, duration, and frequency of bursting (Bains et al.
1999
). Conversely, it has been reported that superfusion with 0 Mg2+ buffer (which would enhance NMDA responses),
increases or in some cases initiates bursting (Chesi and Stone
1997
), which is consistent with this hypothesis. For these
reasons, it was particularly important to demonstrate that persistent
bursting induced by 8SPT also could be blocked by other agents that
block LTP but do not interact with NMDA receptors. Thus the inhibition
of persistent bursting by KN-62, an inhibitor of
Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase,
confirms that the cellular mechanisms underlying the two effects is
similar and suggests that the effects of the NMDA receptor antagonists
are not simply due to an inhibition of the bursting below some
threshold that is required to induce the persistent effect. These
results stand in contrast to the findings of Alzheimer et al.
(1993)
, who reported that NMDA antagonists did not reverse the
persistent effects of DPCPX. However, in their experiments with NMDA
antagonists, it was unclear whether DPCPX was completely washed out of
the tissue. Thus the persistence of bursting in the presence of NMDA
antagonists in their experiments may have resulted from the continued
occupancy of adenosine receptors by DPCPX. One observation that cannot
be explained by an LTP-like mechanism is the persistent depolarizing effect of DPCPX on CA3 neurons (Alzheimer et al. 1993
).
This study reported that superfusion with both DPCPX as well as
adenosine deaminase produced persistent decreases in the membrane
potential that were also very long-lasting. These results suggest that
there may be other enduring consequences of reversing the effects of endogenous adenosine that may not depend on LTP-like mechanisms and
will require further investigation.
A final issue of concern relates to the functional significance of these observations in relation to the effects of caffeine, theophylline, and other adenosine receptor antagonists in man. Although the present results suggest that there could be adverse long-term consequences to the use of these pharmacological agents, clinical observations on individuals using these drugs generally does not support this idea. Seizures induced by theophylline do occur, but usually only in the case of overdose, and they appear to involve other mechanisms in addition to the antagonism of adenosine receptors. In this respect, it should be pointed out that "normal" hippocampal slices probably correspond to a proconvulsant state, in that some of the recurrent inhibitory pathways that normally suppress bursting in vivo are truncated in the slice cutting procedure. In addition, most studies of bursting in hippocampal slices use media with reduced Ca2+ and Mg2+ concentrations, and in some cases elevated K+, to observe reliable bursting, and these conditions are not normally found in vivo. Thus it is unlikely that concentrations of caffeine and theophylline within the normal ranges induce hippocampal bursting in intact animals or humans, and correspondingly, it is unlikely that they would induce any persistent effects. However, in individuals with seizure disorders, it is quite possible that the excitatory actions of adenosine receptor antagonists could initiate bursting, which then might induce persistent effects via an NMDA receptor-dependent mechanism. For this reason, the use of adenosine antagonists in such individuals would be contraindicated.
In conclusion, the present studies have demonstrated that superfusion of hippocampal brain slices with adenosine receptor antagonists induces epileptiform bursting, and that after drug washout, this bursting continues well beyond the duration of antagonist occupation of adenosine receptors. This effect is induced by the displacement of endogenous adenosine from adenosine A1 receptors, but simultaneous occupation of A2A or A2B receptors by an antagonist does not modify the incidence of the persistent response. The induction of this persistent bursting requires activation of NMDA receptors, as well as Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase. These results suggest that under certain conditions, the use of methylxanthines could lead to persistent increases in brain excitability.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
We acknowledge helpful discussions of this work with J. S. Bains and K. J. Staley.
This work was supported by Grant R01 NS-29173 from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and by the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Research Service.
![]() |
FOOTNOTES |
---|
Address for reprint requests: T. V. Dunwiddie, Pharmacology C236, Univ. of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200 E. 9th Ave., Denver, CO 80262.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 9 August 1999; accepted in final form 2 December 1999.
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|