1Department of Biology, 2Department of Physics, 3Institute for Nonlinear Science, and 4Marine Physical Laboratory, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, California 92093-0402
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Elson, Robert C., Ramon Huerta, Henry D. I. Abarbanel, Mikhail I. Rabinovich, and Allen I. Selverston. Dynamic Control of Irregular Bursting in an Identified Neuron of an Oscillatory Circuit. J. Neurophysiol. 82: 115-122, 1999. In the oscillatory circuits known as central pattern generators (CPGs), most synaptic connections are inhibitory. We have assessed the effects of inhibitory synaptic input on the dynamic behavior of a component neuron of the pyloric CPG in the lobster stomatogastric ganglion. Experimental perturbations were applied to the single, lateral pyloric neuron (LP), and the resulting voltage time series were analyzed using an entropy measure obtained from power spectra. When isolated from phasic inhibitory input, LP generates irregular spiking-bursting activity. Each burst begins in a relatively stereotyped manner but then evolves with exponentially increasing variability. Periodic, depolarizing current pulses are poor regulators of this activity, whereas hyperpolarizing pulses exert a strong, frequency-dependent regularizing action. Rhythmic inhibitory inputs from presynaptic pacemaker neurons also regularize the bursting. These inputs 1) reset LP to a similar state at each cycle, 2) extend and further stabilize the initial, quasi-stable phase of its bursts, and 3) at sufficiently high frequencies terminate ongoing bursts before they become unstable. The dynamic time frame for stabilization overlaps the normal frequency range of oscillations of the pyloric CPG. Thus, in this oscillatory circuit, the interaction of rhythmic inhibitory input with intrinsic burst properties affects not only the phasing, but also the dynamic stability of neural activity.
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Coordinated, oscillatory activity occurs in neural
assemblies in many parts of the nervous system, including sensory
circuits (Laurent 1996; Singer 1993
),
thalamic and cortical networks (Steriade et al. 1993
),
and motor centers (Grillner et al. 1995
; Marder and Calabrese 1996
). How can such networks produce reliable,
rhythmic bursting when the intrinsic activity of individual neurons may be irregular (Mainen and Sejnowski 1995
, van
Steveninck et al. 1997
) or chaotic (Abarbanel et al.
1996
; Hayashi and Ishizuka 1992
)? We suggest
that the intrinsic instabilities of circuit neurons may be regulated by
their synaptic interactions. To begin testing this hypothesis, we have
studied an identified, irregularly bursting neuron of an oscillatory
network, characterizing its dynamic response to periodic current pulses
and to phasic inhibitory input from presynaptic, pacemaker neurons.
Central pattern generators (CPGs; the circuits that produce and control
rhythmic movements) are favorable subjects for this type of analysis.
CPGs generate stereotyped patterns of rhythmic activity, and their
component neurons and synaptic connections can be identified. Much
detailed study (mainly in invertebrates) has yielded a qualitative
understanding of rhythm generation in terms of interacting cellular and
synaptic properties (Arshavsky et al. 1993;
Getting 1989
; Grillner et al. 1995
;
Harris-Warrick et al. 1992
; Marder and Calabrese
1996
; Selverston and Moulins 1985
). However,
more fundamental questions remain unresolved. For example, although
most CPG circuits are dominated by inhibitory synaptic connections
(Getting 1989
; Marder and Calabrese 1996
; Selverston and Moulins 1985
), the functional advantage
of connecting bursty neurons by inhibition rather than by alternative
patterns of excitation is not clear. Further analysis requires the use of quantitative methods. Applying these techniques in appropriate experimental systems, we can start to dissect the effects of synaptic connectivity on the dynamics of neurons within circuits. In this paper
we report an analysis of the dynamic behavior of an identified neuron
within a well-characterized CPG.
The pyloric network of the lobster stomatogastric ganglion (STG)
comprises 14 neurons whose identity and connectivity are completely
established (Harris-Warrick et al. 1992; Miller
1987
). Under normal modulatory influences, the circuit
oscillates at 0.5-2 Hz. A set of three, electrically coupled,
"pacemaker" neurons [anterior burster cell (AB) and 2 pyloric
dilator cells (PDs)] burst rhythmically and inhibit all the other
circuit neurons (Fig. 1A1).
These rebound to fire regular bursts of spikes at phases set by their
own active membrane properties and inhibitory synaptic interactions
(Miller 1987
).
|
The lateral pyloric neuron (LP) sits at an important node of the
circuit. It interacts with several other pyloric neurons and provides
strong synaptic feedback to the pacemaker group. LP itself receives
phasic inhibition from the pacemakers and from several other circuit
neurons (Fig. 1A1). In this setting, LP produces regular
bursts of spikes within the pyloric rhythm. However, when isolated from
the phasic inhibition provided by other pyloric neurons (Fig.
1A3), it bursts in an irregular pattern (Bal et al.
1988).
We term this irregular bursting of LP its free-running
activity. The bursting persists in the absence of obvious phasic
synaptic inputs, although its expression requires continued modulatory input from the anterior ganglia of the stomatogastric nervous system
(Bal et al. 1988). The detailed origin of the
irregularity is not examined here. Instead, we study the regulatory
effects of different polarities and frequencies of phasic input, as a first step in understanding how irregular bursting behavior is controlled synaptically within an oscillatory circuit.
We study the dynamic behavior of LP as follows: 1) when free-running in isolation from phasic inhibition; 2) when receiving periodic current pulses; and 3) when rhythmically inhibited by the pyloric pacemaker group (PD/AB) (Fig. 1A2). Rhythmic inhibitory inputs regularize LP's bursting activity, provided that they act within a dynamic time frame (set by the interaction of the synaptic input with intrinsic burst properties). This time scale overlaps the normal range of rhythm frequencies in the intact circuit. In contrast, the regularizing action of periodic excitatory input is much less. Our quantitative analysis shows that rhythmic inhibition does not simply interrupt or "entrain" the irregular bursting, but produces dynamic stabilization. Thus inhibitory coupling can promote ordered bursting in irregular neurons of oscillatory circuits.
A preliminary account of this work appeared as an abstract
(Elson et al. 1997).
![]() |
METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Experimental methods
Adult spiny lobsters, Panulirus interruptus, were
caught locally and kept in running seawater until use. The
stomatogastric nervous system, consisting of the STG and anterior
(commissural and oesophageal) ganglia and their connecting and motor
nerves, was removed from the foregut (Mulloney and Selverston
1974) and pinned out in a silicone elastomer (Sylgard)-lined
dish, filled with normal saline (in mM: 479 NaCl, 13 KCl, 14 CaCl2, 6 MgSO4, 4 Na2SO4, 5 HEPES, and 5 TES;
pH 7.4). The STG was separately superfused by a continuous flow of
chilled saline (14-17°C; temperature variation was kept within 1°C
during each recording session), to which drugs were added as needed.
The ganglion was desheathed and the somata of pyloric neurons impaled
by microelectrodes (filled with 3 M-KCl; resistance ~20 M
).
Neurons were identified by their characteristic phase of bursting and
by correlation of spikes with impulses in motor nerves. Voltage signals
were amplified by conventional electrometers and stored on video tape.
Quantitative analysis (see Analytic methods) was
applied to results from experiments in seven preparations.
We focused on the single, LP within the pyloric circuit (Fig. 1A1). Synaptic inputs to LP were reduced in two stages (always retaining the normal modulatory influence of the anterior ganglia).
INHIBITORY SUBCIRCUIT (FIG. 1A2).
Fast, glutamatergic inhibition was blocked with 7.5 µM picrotoxin
(PTX) (Eisen and Marder 1982) and the cholinergic,
ventricular dilator neuron (VD) was photoinactivated (Miller and
Selverston 1979
). In this configuration, the only remaining
circuit input to LP came from the two PD cells, which, together with
the AB cell, form a group of electrically coupled pacemaker neurons
(PD/AB). The normal synaptic feedback to the pacemakers was blocked by the PTX (Fig. 1A2). The PD/AB group bursts as a single unit,
in a nearly periodic pattern.
ISOLATION OF LP FROM INHIBITORY SYNAPTIC INPUT (FIG.
1A3).
Lasting isolation of LP from the phasic, chemical synaptic input
provided by other pyloric neurons was obtained by applying PTX and
photoinactivating VD and both PDs (Bal et al. 1988;
Bidaut 1980
; Miller 1987
). [A weak,
rectifying electrical connection remains between LP and some pyloric
(PY) neurons (Graubard and Hartline 1987
; Johnson
et al. 1993
). The extent to which this interaction influences
LP's bursting is presently unknown.] As long as modulatory influences
from the commissural ganglia are maintained, LP will continue to burst,
but in an irregular manner (Bal et al. 1988
). The
voltage activity of LP under these conditions is termed
"free-running."
Analytic methods
Long time series of voltage activity (5-6 min) were digitized
at 2 kHz for off-line analysis. To evaluate the degree of irregularity of the observed oscillations, we utilized the power spectrum for each
measurement and a measure of the entropy for the harmonics of the power
spectra for frequencies up to 40 Hz. We first calculated the fast
Fourier transform for 219 = 524,288 points
(sampled every 0.5 ms) of voltage time series (cf. Figs.
2 and 4). Digitized voltage signals
received no further filtering before Fourier analysis. The power in
harmonics up to 40 Hz, P(n) for n = 0... 20,976, were converted to probability values by defining
p(n) = P(n)/P(n). An entropy
function (in bits), S =
np(n)
log2 [p(n)], was then
evaluated. S gives a quantitative measure of the complexity
of the power spectrum associated with the observed time series. In this
measure, a power spectrum with a single peak (a linear periodic system)
yields S = 0 bits. A spectrum with two isolated peaks
(namely, a linear quasiperiodic system with two possible states) gives
S = 1 bit. A flat or white spectrum extending to 40 Hz
(or n = 20,976) yields S = log2 20,976 = 14.35 bits. Low values of
S, relative to 14.35 bits, are then interpreted as
associated with lower complexity in the oscillations of the system.
|
Within a given time series, we also calculated the variance between the voltage trajectories of successive bursts. Bursts were aligned at the site of minimum variance, and an average trajectory calculated. We computed the variance of individual trajectories from the average and plotted this value as a function of time (Fig. 5).
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Irregular, free-running bursting of LP
When effectively isolated from the chemical synaptic inputs
normally provided by the rest of the network (see Fig. 1A3
and METHODS; slow modulatory influences of anterior ganglia
were retained), LP continued to burst, but in an irregular pattern
(Fig. 1B) (Bal et al. 1988). In this
free-running activity, bursts of spikes (which appear attenuated in
somatic recordings) were driven by the slow oscillations of membrane
potential. Each depolarized phase is underlain by a plateau potential
(Bal et al. 1988
; Russell and Hartline
1978
, 1982
). The plateaus were of variable
duration and could develop smaller-amplitude oscillations; these
features accounted for much of the irregular appearance of the time
series (Fig. 1B). Nevertheless, the initiation of each burst
was relatively stereotyped, with a similar initial waveform and pattern
of spikes (Fig. 1C). This initial phase lasted ~500 ms.
Thereafter, the slow waveform and spike pattern began to vary. The time
of burst termination was highly variable (Fig. 1, B and
C). An analysis of interspike intervals showed that spike
timings were sharply defined at burst onset, but became increasingly
variable as the burst continued (Fig. 1D).
Regularizing effects of periodic current pulses
This irregular, free-running activity contrasts markedly with the
regular burst pattern that is produced when LP is connected to the rest
of the circuit (Bal et al. 1988). In the intact network, the neuron receives rhythmic synaptic inputs that regulate the timing
of its bursts (Miller 1987
).
In our experiments reported here, we have begun a study of the dynamic response of LP to rhythmic inputs. Initially, we examined the reaction of the synaptically isolated neuron to injection of periodic current pulses (Figs. 2 and 3; n = 3 preparations). The amplitude and duration of pulses were adjusted to mimic those of rhythmic barrages of synaptic input from other pyloric cells.
|
We found strikingly different results, depending on pulse polarity (Fig. 2). With no current pulses, LP generated a typical, irregular burst pattern (Fig. 2A). The corresponding power spectrum showed a wide distribution with a broad peak centered at ~0.3 Hz (Fig. 2D). From this, we derived an S = 8.08 bits. With LP in this isolated state we applied periodic current pulses at a slightly higher frequency, 0.45 Hz. Depolarizing pulses approximating excitatory input affected both the timing and duration of bursts but produced little regularization of the pattern (Fig. 2B). Falling during the interburst, a depolarizing pulse could trigger the onset of a new burst; falling during an ongoing burst, it had variable actions, sometimes triggering burst offset. Cycle-by-cycle, the bursting remained irregular (Fig. 2B). The corresponding Fourier spectrum showed little structural change, apart from the addition of local peaks at the stimulus frequency and its multiples. The entropy value was S = 7.71 (Fig. 2E).
In distinct contrast, hyperpolarizing pulses, mimicking inhibitory input, strongly affected burst timing and regularized the pattern (Fig. 2C). Falling during the plateau, the hyperpolarizing pulse could terminate the burst. Subsequently, the neuron underwent a hyperpolarized phase (outlasting the pulse) before it recovered to generate a new burst. Repetitions of this sequence produced a nearly, but not completely, periodic pattern of bursts (Fig. 2C). The Fourier spectrum underwent a structural change: power was now concentrated in sharp peaks located at the forcing frequency and its harmonics, and the entropy dropped to S = 3.46 (Fig. 2F).
Extended time series, taken from a similar experiment, show the regularization produced by pulses at different frequencies (Fig. 3). The free-running neuron displayed typical, irregular bursting and high entropy (Fig. 3A). At low frequency (0.4 Hz), depolarizing pulses produced little regularization and almost no reduction in entropy (Fig. 3B). At higher-frequency stimulation (0.8 Hz), the bursting showed episodic coordination, with a small decrease in entropy; however, the behavior was unstable (Fig. 3C). Hyperpolarizing pulses produced longer episodes of 1:1 and 1:2 coordination. Accordingly, burst patterns were more regular and showed larger reductions in entropy (Fig. 3, D and E). Greater regularization occurred at higher stimulus frequency. An intermediate stimulus frequency, 0.6 Hz, produced intermediate reductions in entropy for both pulse polarities (data not shown).
Regularization by synaptic inhibition from pacemaker neurons
Next, we examined the dynamic regularization of LP by a biological
input (Figs. 4 and
5). We used the simple subcircuit
shown in Fig. 1A2, in which the only phasic input to LP was
the slow inhibitory postsynaptic potential evoked by the two PD neurons of the electrically coupled (PD/AB) pacemaker group (Eisen and Marder 1982). We then used current injection to alter the
frequency of bursting in the pacemakers (n = 3 preparations).
|
|
Figure 4, A-D, left column, illustrates simultaneous intracellular recordings from LP and one of the PDs during subcircuit activity. With no current injection, the pacemakers generated rhythmic bursts (here at ~1.3 Hz; Fig. 4A, spontaneous). In each cycle, the PD neurons fired and inhibited LP, which then rebounded into its own burst before being inhibited again by the next burst of the pacemakers (Fig. 4A). Using current injection, we then forced the PDs to burst at progressively lower frequencies: 1 Hz (Fig. 4B), 0.65 Hz (Fig. 4C), and 0.4 Hz (Fig. 4D). Finally, we applied strong hyperpolarization to shut off the pacemakers completely (Fig. 4E: only the LP trace is shown). As the frequency of pacemaker input was reduced, LP developed increasingly irregular behavior (Fig. 4, B-D). On removal of inputs, the typical, free-running activity emerged (Fig. 4E).
The corresponding power spectra of LP activity are shown the Fig. 4, right column. During spontaneous subcircuit activity, the LP displayed a power spectrum with strong peaks at the pacemaker frequency and its harmonics (Fig. 4A). The entropy of LP activity was S = 5.1 bits. Forcing the pacemakers to burst more slowly caused the LP spectra to broaden and lose structure (while retaining local peaks at the forcing frequency and its harmonics; Fig. 4, B-D). When the pacemakers were shut off, LP activity displayed a broadband spectrum (Fig. 4E): the entropy increased to S = 7.9 bits.
To study effects on burst structure in LP, we analyzed the burst-by-burst variability of voltage oscillations (Fig. 5). The variance between voltage trajectories of individual bursts was computed for time series recorded in each condition (spontaneous input, forced input, etc.). The point of minimum variance occurred at the upswing of membrane potential preceding burst onset. Using this reference point (designated as time 0 ms), we aligned and superimposed the voltage traces of individual bursts (Fig. 5, left), and plotted the variance of trajectories as a function of time elapsed during the average burst cycle (Fig. 5, right).
With no circuit inputs (free-running activity, Fig. 5E) voltage traces converged before burst onset, remained correlated during the first ~500 ms of the burst, and then diverged again (Fig. 5E, left). The variance declined exponentially as the trajectories converged, jumped to a stable level for the initial stage of the burst, and then increased exponentially during the divergent tail (Fig. 5E, right: small oscillations on the plateau reflect correlated spike activity). This behavior resembles that of a typical nonlinear dynamic system showing chaotic oscillations with some additive noise.
Periodic inhibition introduced several changes (Fig. 5, A-D). At all frequencies, the inhibitory input terminated the preceding burst, forcing a strong, early convergence of voltage trajectories (with a corresponding drop in variance) before the initiation of a new burst on rebound. At the lowest input frequency (0.4 Hz), enough time elapsed between inputs to allow the tail of the burst to become unstable, although the rise in variance was delayed and slowed (Fig. 5D). At 0.65 Hz, the onset of divergence was slowed further, so that the burst remained relatively stable until terminated by the next input (Fig. 5C). As the input frequency increased, bursts were terminated sooner, before the strong divergence of trajectories and exponential growth of variance could develop. The correlation, between bursts, of the initial sequence of spikes was also increased (Fig. 5, A and B). This indicates a regularizing effect on spike discharge.
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Our results show that irregular bursting in LP, a component neuron of the pyloric CPG, is subject to dynamic regulation by rhythmic synaptic inhibition from the pyloric pacemaker cells (PD/AB). The regularizing effect of periodic inhibition is frequency dependent within a range determined by the time scale of the developing instability. This range overlaps the normal burst frequencies of the presynaptic pacemakers. Interestingly, periodic excitation was much less effective.
Dynamics of bursting in component neurons of the pyloric CPG
When the pyloric circuit of the STG is intact and activated by
modulatory input from the anterior ganglia, it generates a regular,
rhythmic pattern of activity in which the bursts of its component
neurons are tightly coordinated. Each component neuron expresses a
particular set of burst-generating membrane properties. Its bursting
activity in the intact circuit is a product of the interaction of these
intrinsic burst properties and phasic synaptic inputs from other
pyloric neurons (Harris-Warrick et al. 1992; Miller 1987
). When circuit synaptic interactions are
blocked or inactivated, each component neuron can continue to burst,
but with different temporal properties. The AB neuron generates
regular, rhythmic bursts; in all other pyloric neurons, however,
free-running bursts show irregularities (Bal et al.
1988
).
The free-running bursts of LP are produced by repetitive plateau
potentials of variable duration (Bal et al. 1988). We
show that each burst actually begins with a similar slow wave of
membrane potential and similar initial spike discharge. Subsequently,
the plateau phase developed exponentially increasing variability. This
instability could arise from intrinsic mechanisms, extrinsic influences, or both. We eliminated strong, phasic inputs, but could not
exclude the possibility of residual electrotonic interactions with
other pyloric neurons, or undetected, phasic synaptic interactions with
interneurons from the anterior ganglia. However, known extrinsic factors (electrical coupling to some PY neurons, inputs from
commissural "P" interneurons) are weak or absent under our
recording conditions (Bidaut 1980
; Johnson et al.
1993
); irregular, free-running burst patterns could occur
without any obvious, strong phasic inputs (e.g., Fig. 4E).
Moreover, the variability in plateau duration and spike pattern were
strongly voltage dependent (Abarbanel et al.
1996
; Bal et al. 1988
). This suggests a
major (although not exclusive) contribution from intrinsic mechanisms.
How could cellular mechanisms produce irregular bursting? One
possibility, indicated by modeling studies (e.g., Chay
1996
; H. Abarbanel, M. Falcke, R. Huerta, and M. Rabinovich,
unpublished data), is the generation of chaotic voltage activity by the
interaction of membrane conductances with slow intracellular calcium dynamics.
Regardless of its underlying mechanisms, the complex, irregular voltage behavior of LP allows us to study the regulatory action exerted by phasic synaptic inputs. From a dynamic perspective, the exponential changes in variance and the convergent-divergent trajectories of membrane voltage suggest the presence of deterministic behavior (in addition to inevitable noise). These dynamics contribute to the regularizing action of rhythmic inputs.
Dynamic control of irregular bursting by rhythmic inhibition
Rhythmic synaptic inhibition, such as that provided by the pyloric pacemaker neurons, produces frequency-dependent stabilization of irregular bursting in the LP. Regularization occurs through a sequence of events. 1) At each cycle, inhibitory input triggers active termination of the ongoing burst and sets the neuron to a similar, hyperpolarized state. 2) Subsequently, the neuron recovers to generate a new burst. The initial, stable phase of this burst is extended, and the development of instability is slowed. 3) At high enough input frequencies, the stable phase extends to the arrival of the next inhibitory input. At low input frequencies, the LP neuron can develop instability during the interval between inputs, and irregular oscillations occur.
Regularization therefore occurs within a dynamic time frame. In our
experiments, rhythmic input reduced and stabilized the variance between
voltage trajectories for a period lasting up to 1.3 s (Fig. 5,
C and D). This suggests that periodic inhibition can stabilize bursting at frequencies 0.7 Hz, but not much lower. In
fact, stabilization began to fail at ~0.3-0.4 Hz. The normal burst
frequency of the pacemakers (and of the pyloric CPG as whole) ranges
from ~0.5 to 2 Hz (Miller and Selverston 1979
),
encompassing the time frame for effective stabilization.
We worked with a simplified subcircuit of the pyloric CPG (Fig.
1A2). In the intact circuit, LP neuron receives phasic
inhibition from two main sources: the pyloric pacemaker group and the
PY neurons (Fig. 1A1). Like LP, the PYs are inhibited by the
pacemakers; however, they rebound more slowly. When they begin their
delayed burst, they inhibit LP (Miller 1987). Their
action further truncates the LP burst, but does not evoke the same,
reliable hyperpolarization as subsequent, pacemaker input. The PY
pathway augments, but does not qualitatively change, the stabilization
produced by direct pacemaker inhibition.
Reliable, phasic hyperpolarization may extend the stable phase of a subsequent LP burst by enhancing and regularizing the activation of burst-generating currents. In dynamic terms, each periodic input forces the neuron into a similar, convergent region of its state space, thereby decreasing the subsequent divergence of trajectories during burst evolution. The weaker regularizing action of periodic excitation (depolarizing input) is now readily understood. Depolarizing pulses can trigger the onset of a new burst but do not stabilize its subsequent development; they can terminate an ongoing burst, but this action is unreliable (Fig. 2 and data not shown). Neither effect allows for a stable cooperation with burst dynamics.
Regularization and dynamic stabilization must be distinguished from
simple "interruption" or "entrainment." Interruption of ongoing
irregular activity should produce no change in the underlying slow
dynamics. Entrainment refers to phase locking of one oscillator to
another. This concept is difficult to apply when the driven oscillator
is irregular. Beyond phase locking, however, our analysis points to
regularization of both slow oscillations and spike patterns. Regular
output is by no means the inevitable result of periodic forcing of a
nonlinear oscillator (Dymirtiev and Kislov 1982; Ueda and Akamatsu 1981
).
Stabilization of bursting in oscillatory circuits
We suggest that rhythmic inhibition stabilizes the irregular burst activity of LP by resetting the neuron to a reproducible region of its parameter space where essential, burst-generating currents undergo voltage-dependent activation or deinactivation with appropriate kinetics. Conceivably, other bursting neurons may possess other combinations of ionic currents with different properties, such that optimal resetting could occur in depolarized voltage ranges. These cells would operate with different dynamic rules.
Nevertheless, the effects described here may have some general
relevance. Neurons of many oscillatory circuits possess low-threshold, inward currents that allow them to fire relatively stereotyped bursts
of spikes following phasic inhibition (Alonso and Llinas 1992; Getting 1989
; Huguenard
1996
; Llinas 1988
; Marder and Calabrese 1996
). Plateau potentials extend the duration of burst firing in a variety of motor and central circuits (see Pearson and
Ramirez 1992
, for review). Rhythmic synaptic inhibition,
arising from pacemaker-like (Gray and McCormick 1996
) or
network (Traub et al. 1996
) activity, is an important
element in the oscillatory activity of vertebrate brains
(Buzsaki and Chrobak 1995
). Inhibitory interconnections
also predominate in CPGs, where they are implicated in rhythmogenesis
and phasing (Arshavsky et al. 1993
; Getting 1989
; Harris-Warrick et al. 1992
; Marder
and Calabrese 1996
; Selverston and Moulins
1985
). Our results suggest that a neuron with irregular plateau
potentials will experience greater stabilization from phasic inhibition
than phasic excitation. We conclude that rhythmic inhibition can exert
dynamic control over bursting activity, affecting not only its phase,
but also its stability and regularity.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
We thank an anonymous reviewer for helpful criticism.
This work was supported by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grant NS-09322 and National Science Foundation Grant IBN-9122712 to A. I. Selverston, by U.S. Department of Energy Grants DE-FG03-90ER14138 and DE-FG03-96ER14592 to H.D.I. Abarbanel and M. I. Rabinovich, respectively, and by Office of Research and Development contract 97-F132800-000.
Present addresses: R. Huerta, Dept. of Computer Engineering, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain; A. I. Selverston, Instituto de Neurobiologica, Old San Juan, 00901, Puerto Rico.
![]() |
FOOTNOTES |
---|
Address for reprint requests: R. C. Elson, Dept. of Biology and INLS 0402, UCSD, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0402.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 19 November 1998; accepted in final form 3 March 1999.
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|