University Laboratory of Physiology, Oxford OX1 3PT, United Kingdom
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Krug, Kristine, Colin J. Akerman, and Ian D. Thompson. Responses of Neurons in Neonatal Cortex and Thalamus to Patterned Visual Stimulation Through the Naturally Closed Lids. J. Neurophysiol. 85: 1436-1443, 2001. In studies of the developing mammalian visual system, it has been axiomatic that visual experience begins with eye-opening. Any role for neuronal activity earlier in development has been attributed to the patterned spontaneous activity found in retina and lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN). Here we show that, as early as 2 wk before eye-opening, visual stimuli presented through the closed eyelids can drive neuronal activity in LGN and striate cortex of the ferret. At this age, spontaneous activity in cortex is much lower than in LGN, and the visual responses of many cortical, but not geniculate, neurons depend on the orientation of a moving grating. Furthermore the selectivity of cortical neurons to the orientation of gratings presented through the closed eyelids improves with age. Thus neuronal activity patterned by visual experience, rather than by spontaneous retinal activity, is present in visual cortex much earlier than previously thought. This could have important implications for the self-organization of visual cortex.
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
One of the most
intriguing issues in the development of the visual system is the
balance between genetic programming and adaptation to early experience.
Of particular interest has been the source of the information required
to establish precise connections between neurons. In this context, one
area of investigation has been the role of neuronal activitypatterned
either by sensory experience or by intrinsic mechanisms. For instance,
changes in visual experience after eye-opening can disrupt the
framework of orientation columns and clustered horizontal connections
in visual cortex, which is established in the period before and
immediately after natural eye-opening (Chapman and Stryker
1993
; Chapman et al. 1996
; Durack and
Katz 1996
; Löwel and Singer 1992
;
Ruthazer and Stryker 1996
; Sengpiel et al.
1999
). Since orientation-tuned neurons can be found in visual
cortex at eye-opening, or even earlier if the eyes are artificially
opened (Blakemore and Van Sluyters 1975
; Chapman and Stryker 1993
; Hubel and Wiesel
1963
), and orientation columns appear shortly afterward
(Chapman et al. 1996
; Gödecke and
Bonhoeffer 1996
; Thompson et al. 1983
), it has
been suggested that the basic architecture for orientation selectivity
must develop independently of visual experience. However, experimental
evidence does imply a role for neuronal activity prior to the time of
eye-opening. Electrical stimulation of the optic nerve, cortical
infusion of tetrodotoxin, or blockade of ON-center retinal
ganglion cell activity all disrupt the development of orientation
tuning (Chapman and Gödecke 2000
; Chapman
and Stryker 1993
; Weliky and Katz 1997
).
One interpretation of these data is that the early manipulations are
effective because they disrupt the intrinsic, spontaneous activity in
the visual system. The nature of spontaneous activity in the neonatal
ferret retina has been well characterized and displays two patterns
(Wong and Oakley 1996; Wong et al. 1993
; see Wong 1999
). In very young neonates, waves of
correlated activity spread slowly across regions of retina
a pattern
that would be appropriate for refinement of retinotopic maps or
segregation of inputs from the two eyes. In older ferrets, from about 2 wk before eye-opening, the correlations are much more localized
spatially and are also ganglion cell class-specific
a pattern that may
be more appropriate for the formation of cortical orientation tuning (see Miller et al. 1999
). Indeed, this later pattern of
retinal activity propagates into the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), where the statistics of firing resemble, but are not identical to,
those in the retina (Weliky and Katz 1999
). However, it
is not known whether subcortical spontaneous activity can drive
cortical neurons nor is it certain whether the patterning of neuronal
activity in the visual system before eye-opening occurs only via
intrinsic mechanisms.
Given indications that light passing through the lids may
stimulate the visual system before eye-opening and after lid suture in
kittens (Eysel et al. 1979; Huttenlocher
1967
; Spear et al. 1978
) and that ferret
cortical neurons are responsive to visual stimuli if the eyelids are
parted prematurely (Chapman and Stryker 1993
), we
examined whether geniculate and cortical neurons in neonatal ferrets
respond to visual stimuli presented to the still closed eyes. And if
so, how much information about the visual stimulus is encoded in the
early spatiotemporal patterns of neuronal activity? We also directly
compared spontaneous and visually driven neuronal activity in both
cortex and LGN and examined the developmental changes in the stimulus
selectivity of cortical neurons. Some of these results have been
published in abstract form (Krug and Thompson 1997
,
1998
).
![]() |
METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Animals
Pigmented ferret kits from time-mated females (Marshall Farms, New Rose, NY; Glaxo, UK; University Laboratory of Physiology, Oxford, UK) were studied between postnatal day 21 (P21) and P24 (n = 10), between P19 and P20 (n = 4), and between P29 and P32 (n = 3) for the cortical recordings. The geniculate data were collected from four ferret kits between P21 and P22. All ferret kits had firmly closed eyes at and during the time of recording.
Surgery and anesthesia
Anesthesia was induced with alphaxalone 0.9% and alphadolone
acetate 0.3% (Saffan, Pitman-Moore, Uxbridge, UK; 1.5 ml/kg im). This
was followed by 0.1 ml of atropine sulfate (BP 0.6 mg/ml; C-Vet,
Leylands, UK) intraperitoneally or subcutaneously. During the surgery,
anesthesia was maintained by intermittent intravenous administration of
Saffan (diluted 1:2 in 0.9% saline). The trachea was usually intubated
through the mouth; in some animals, however, a tracheotomy was
performed, and the tube was inserted directly into the trachea. For
cortical recordings, craniotomies were made roughly 1 mm rostral and 7 mm lateral of lambda in one or both hemispheres. For LGN recordings,
larger craniotomies were made 8-9 mm rostral and 4-5 mm lateral of
lambda. During recordings, anesthesia was maintained by a continuous
infusion with a solution of medetomidine (Domitor, SmithKlineBeecham,
Surrey, UK; 11-44 µg · kg1 · h
1) and ketamine (KetaSet, Willows Francis
Veterinary, UK; 2.5-10 mg · kg
1
· h
1 ) in 0.9% sterile saline, and the
animal was paralyzed with gallamine tri-ethiodide (Sigma, 10 mg
· kg
1 · h
1 ).
To monitor anesthetic state, ECG and PCO2 were
continuously recorded during the experiment. In addition, control
experiments performed without paralysis confirmed that the anesthetic
regime was stable and adequate.
Recordings
Action potentials were recorded extracellularly with
glass-coated tungsten microelectrodes with a 5-µm exposed tip. The
majority of cortical units were recorded 350 µm or more beneath the
pial surfacecorresponding approximately to layers IV-VI. Visual
stimuli were presented on a display screen that covered up to 49° of
central visual space. Full-screen, high-contrast (90-100% Michelson
contrast) squarewave gratings of low spatial frequency (0.01-0.03
cycles/°) and low temporal frequency (0.25 cycles/s) were displayed.
For recordings in P19-P20 ferret kits, the Michelson contrast was 100%. The mean luminance of the screen (40 cdm
2; minimum, 0-4
cdm
2; maximum, 77-80
cdm
2) was comparable to
the background luminance measured in the animal house. In the animals'
nest boxes, we measured 0.4-1.4
cdm
2 reflectances of the
walls, 24 cdm
2 toward the
entrance hole, and 62 cdm
2 with the box lid
open. In the cages, the reflectances of the walls were 2-48
cdm
2, and the front of
the cage measured 4-89
cdm
2 (light meter
horizontal or pointing down) and over 342 cdm
2 if angled upward.
Gratings were displayed in four different orientations each moving in two directions. Additionally, a uniform display of zero contrast and identical mean luminance was used to record spontaneous activity. In a typical experiment, all nine stimuli were shown in a pseudo-randomized order, mostly each grating in blocks of five cycles (in few experiments blocks of 10 or 20 grating cycles were used). When each had been presented, the sequence was re-randomized, and the procedure was repeated between three and seven times. The stimuli were always displayed to the unopened eyelids. They were usually presented to both eyes, but in a small number of experiments, monocular stimulation of the contralateral eye was used.
Analysis
The orientation selectivity index (OSI) assesses the shape of
the orientation tuning curve according to the amplitude of the second
harmonic (Chapman and Stryker 1993;
Wörgötter and Eysel 1987
). First, we
subtracted the spontaneous rate from the average firing rate at each
orientation. Then the amplitude of the second harmonic (A2) of the
tuning curve was extracted by fast Fourier transform (Excel, Version
7.0a for Windows 95) and normalized by division through itself and the
average firing rate (A0)
![]() |
Failure rates were calculated for neurons that showed a modulated response. The failure rate was defined as the percentage of stimulus cycles that did not generate a response at the appropriate phases of the cycle.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Cortical responses through closed eyelids
Ferret kits were studied between P21 and P24their eyes normally
open around P32. Single-unit recordings were made in primary visual
cortex while the eyelids remained closed. Visually responsive neurons
in cortex were first identified by their responses to an intense
flashed light: a total of 86 single units were recorded in 10 ferrets.
Qualitatively, their responses were sluggish with long latencies and,
often, long intervals were required between stimulation to elicit
reliable responses. All 86 units were subsequently tested with drifting
squarewave gratings presented on a display screen in front of the
animal. Fifty-eight units (67%) exhibited significant visual driving
when presented with a particular oriented grating rather than a blank
screen of matched mean luminance (Mann-Whitney U test,
P < 0.05). These units that responded to patterned
visual stimuli presented to the closed eyelids were then analyzed further.
Of the 58 neurons, a considerable number showed differential responses
to moving gratings of varied orientations. The tuning curves of three
neurons are illustrated in Fig.
1. The tuning curve
in Fig. 1A is from a cell which responded to almost all orientations, but was biased to gratings at 45 and 225°. The unit in
Fig. 1B showed a clear preference for horizontal gratings
with other orientations not able to stimulate the neuron. The third neuron was strongly selective for both the orientation and the direction of the drifting grating (Fig. 1C). The
corresponding spike rasters beneath each of the tuning curves reveal
that in all three examples, despite varying firing and failure rates, the timing of the spikes was locked to particular phases of the grating. Overall, 86% of the neurons displayed clear temporal modulation of their responses. In 36% of these, two distinct clusters of spikes, roughly half a cycle apart, could be seen (as for example in
Fig. 1B). The remaining 64% showed one peak only. The mean firing rate to the best stimulus was on average only 2.07 spikes per cycle (SE = 0.33, n = 58), but the mean
spontaneous activity was also very low at 0.19 spikes per
cycle (SE = 0.04, n = 58). This responsiveness of the
visually driven neurons was much less than that in the adult
(Baker et al. 1998). However, for the immature cortical
neurons, mean firing rate may be misleading. Many presentations of the
optimal stimulus did not lead to a response, but when neurons responded, they often did so strongly. For instance, a high failure rate (87% of the trials) is seen for the neuron illustrated in Fig.
1C. Across all the trials, this neuron had an average peak firing rate of 0.53 spikes per cycle, but within a single trial it
responded with up to 7 spikes per cycle.
|
Having established that visual responses in cortex could be elicited
through unopened eyelids in P21-P24 ferrets, the extent of neuronal
selectivity to drifting gratings of differing orientations was
quantified in two ways. A Kruskal-Wallis test of the 58 neurons with
significant visual responses revealed that 22 neurons (38%) showed a
significant variation in their spike rate with stimulus orientation
(P < 0.05; for example Fig. 1, B and
C). However, these statistics reveal little about the shape
of the tuning curve. Therefore the neurons were also ranked on the
orientation selectivity index (OSI) (Chapman and Stryker
1993; Wörgötter and Eysel 1987
) (see
METHODS). The unit in Fig. 1B, for instance, has
a high OSI of 60, reflecting the fact that the tuning curve has two
narrow peaks 180° out of phase. Using the OSI to visualize the
distribution of tuning to oriented gratings in our sample of neurons,
we find that the whole population covers a wide range of OSI values
(Fig. 2), ranging from 4 (nonselective)
to 65 (highly selective). The examples surrounding the central
histogram in Fig. 2 show tuning curves from different parts of the
distribution. Chapman and Stryker (1993)
classify units
with an OSI value of 25 and higher as orientation selective
79% of
the units in Fig. 2 fall into this category. Taking the two measures
together, of the 22 units passing the Kruskal-Wallis, all but four
fulfill the OSI criterion for orientation selectivity. Different
neurons were selective for the full range of orientations tested,
suggesting that the tuning is not an artifact of optical filtering by
the closed eyelids but is neuronal in origin.
|
LGN responses through closed eyelids
To further investigate the origin of the cortical neurons' selectivity, we compared their responses to those of 46 geniculate neurons from animals of about the same age (P21-P22), again stimulating through the closed eyelids. Investigation of the responses to different oriented gratings revealed marked differences between geniculate and cortical responses. Figure 3 shows examples of orientation tuning curves, together with raster plots at the "best" orientation, for three different LGN neurons. Compared with the cortical data in Fig. 1, the most striking feature of the tuning curves is that the geniculate neurons respond reliably at all orientations. The cells in Fig. 3 are characteristic of the population in showing a stimulus-locked, monophasic response, although the width of the response window varied from cell to cell. Each cycle of the grating typically resulted in a burst of several action potentials lasting under 0.5 s. The geniculate neurons depicted in Fig. 3, B and C, had relatively low spontaneous activity, and even the cell in Fig. 3A still showed an instantaneous firing rate during the phasic response that was considerably higher than the background activity. In all these examples, the responses were greater than in most cortical neurons. Further, the failure rates were lower as most cycles generated a response.
|
Analyses of the population data confirm the differences in firing rate in LGN and cortex. The mean firing rate to the optimal stimulus for geniculate neurons at 5.51 spikes per cycle (SE = 0.99, n = 46) was over twice that for cortical neurons at 2.07 spikes per cycle (SE = 0.33, n = 58). This difference was statistically significant (Mann-Whitney U test, P < 0.001). Furthermore the low mean failure rate in the LGN of 19% (SE = 2.8, n = 45) means that bursts of action potentials could be reliably elicited with visual stimulation at relatively short intervals (at least every 4 s, given the temporal frequency of 0.25 Hz used). These failure rates were significantly lower than the mean failure rate of 47% (SE = 3.1, n = 47) measured in cortex (Mann-Whitney U test, P < 0.001). The difference in spontaneous activity was proportionally larger than the difference in visually evoked firing rate. In the LGN, spontaneous firing had a mean of 0.78 spikes per cycle (SE = 0.14, n = 46), which was significantly higher than the cortical mean of 0.19 spikes per cycle (SE = 0.04, n = 58; Mann-Whitney U test P < 0.001): with a blank display, a geniculate action potential occurred on average once every 5 s, whereas a cortical action potential occurred only once every 20 s.
The lack of selectivity of geniculate cells to the orientation of the drifting grating illustrated in Fig. 3 was confirmed across the population. Our sample of 46 neurons had a mean OSI score of just 21 (SE = 1.43), only 15 neurons (33%) had an OSI of 25 or higher and none had a value above 50. Figure 4 shows the difference in OSI distributions between cortical and geniculate neurons at around 3 wk of age. As described in the preceding text, cortical neurons had a mean OSI of 38 (SE = 1.92, n = 58) with 79% of the population with an OSI of 25 or higher and 29% of 50 or higher. Thus cortical OSIs were clearly greater than OSIs obtained from LGN neurons in animals of similar ages (Mann-Whitney U test, P < 0.0005), strengthening our previous conclusion that the differential response of cortical neurons to the orientation of drifting gratings reflects a specialization of cortical circuitry.
|
Age-dependent changes in cortical selectivity
We next investigated whether there was any developmental change in the selectivity of cortical neurons for visual stimuli in the period before eye-opening. Recordings were made in animals younger than 3 wk of age, at P19-P20 (no visual responses could be elicited in LGN or optic nerve at P18) (C. J. Akerman, unpublished observations), and in older animals just before eye-opening, at P29-P32. The developmental trends are illustrated in Figs. 5 and 6.
|
|
At the earliest ages, it proved to be considerably more difficult to drive cortical neurons: in a total of four animals, only eight cortical cells could be shown to respond quantitatively to drifting gratings (Mann-Whitney U test, P < 0.05). The response rates of these neurons were low, failure rates were high, and phase-locking generally weak. The levels of spontaneous activity were also very low. Although the eight neurons responded to visual stimulation, their selectivity for the orientation of the gratings was limited. When ranked according to their OSI, there was very little difference between the 25th and 75th percentiles (see Fig. 5).
The selectivity of the cortical neurons quickly improves with age. Figure 5 includes additional examples from the P21-P24 cohort already described. The modulation of the response by this age was much tighter and failure rates for the optimal stimulus had fallen from a level of 66% (SE = 9.8, n = 6) at P19-P20 to 47% (SE = 3.1, n = 47) by P21-P24. Neurons recorded from animals just before eye-opening (P29-P32) showed the most robust response to drifting gratings. Response levels to the optimal stimulus were generally higher, and the failure rate had decreased to 32% (SE = 5.8, n = 13). The trend toward lower neuronal failure rates with age represented a significant change (Kruskal-Wallis, P < 0.01).
The neuronal selectivity to gratings of different orientations was
analyzed quantitatively for the three age groups. The proportion of
neurons showing a statistically significant variation in response with
orientation (Kruskal-Wallis P < 0.05) was found to
increase with age: from 0% at P19-P20 to 38% P21-P24 and 86% at
P29-P32. The population distributions for different OSI groupings are
shown in Fig. 6. Using the OSI criterion described in the preceding text, at P19-P20 only 38% of the neurons were orientation selective (i.e., had an OSI 25) and none had an OSI
50. By
P21-P24, 79% of the neurons were orientation selective and 29% had a
selectivity
50. In the relatively small sample of cells at
P29-P32, 36% had OSIs
50 and 79% of the population were
orientation selective. This distribution of cells among the three
categories of orientation-selectivity represents a significant
developmental trend (Kruskal-Wallis, P < 0.05). It has
already been demonstrated that a major improvement in orientation
selectivity of cortical neurons takes place after eye-opening
(Chapman and Stryker 1993
). Our data imply that the emergence of a selective response to the orientation of drifting gratings before eye-opening is also a dynamic process.
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The implication of our data is clear: visual experience can start before the eyes open. Almost 2 wk prior to eye-opening, the firing of neurons in the ferret visual system is modulated by drifting gratings presented to the closed lids. The important question is, what is the developmental significance of our observation: is it relevant to the generation of orientation tuning in cortical neurons and/or the organization of tuned neurons into orientation maps?
It might be argued that our stimuli, although conventional for the
study of the neonatal visual system, are unnatural and fail to mimic
the visual stimulation that ferret kits could experience at this stage.
And this is the age when ferret kits begin to venture from the nest
(Porter and Brown 1985). So what is the relation between
our stimuli and "natural" visual stimuli? Although we have matched
luminance to the ranges found in the animal house, the gratings are of
high contrast and of low spatial and temporal frequency. The low
spatial frequency is not a fundamental problem because square-wave
stimuli contain multiple spatial frequencies and also because the
statistics of natural scenes are dominated by low spatial frequencies
(Field 1987
). In fact, the spatiotemporal properties of
our stimuli are not too different from those generated by the head
movements of ferret kits. Videos of head movements reveal angular
velocities in the range of 31-240°/s (C. J. Akerman, unpublished observations), and the velocity of the gratings was 8-25°/s. The concept of contrast in natural scenes is difficult and
depends on the spatial scale at which it is measured (Tadmor and
Tolhurst 1994
). However, given the luminance range of the various surfaces in the animal house (see METHODS), the
head movements could generate temporal contrast ranging from 0 to 97%.
For instance, a head movement across the back and side walls of the
cage corresponds to a temporal contrast of about 75%. Of course, such
arguments are indirect but they support the relevance of the stimuli
used in this study. Clearly it would be useful to know whether the sorts of visual stimulation elicited by the kits' head movements can
actually drive cortical and geniculate neurons presented through the
closed lids. Preliminary results indicate that this is indeed the case
(Akerman et al. 2000
).
It is widely held that the basic circuitry underlying orientation
tuning arises in the absence of visual experience. Orientation selective neurons are found in the cortex of kittens shortly after eye-opening (Blakemore and van Slyuters 1975;
Hubel and Wiesel 1963
), in newborn primates
(Wiesel and Hubel 1974
), and lambs (Clarke et al.
1979
) and in ferrets in which the lids were opened prematurely
(Chapman and Stryker 1993
). The first orientation maps
in ferrets and in cats can be detected by optical imaging some days
after eye-opening (Chapman et al. 1996
;
Gödecke et al. 1997
). It has been argued that
their basic structure is independent of visual experience since this is
unaffected either by early binocular deprivation or by alternate
monocular occlusion (Crair et al. 1998
;
Gödecke and Bonhoeffer 1996
). Optical imaging
experiments have not yet been performed in the newborn primate, but
Wiesel and Hubel (1974)
reported orientation shifts in
the striate cortex of a 2-day-old monkey and clear orientation
sequences in neonates that had been binocularly deprived from birth.
The mechanisms that generate the earliest orientation selectivity are
still not understood. However, it is clear that visual experience
after eye-opening can modulate the subsequent development of
cortical orientation-tuning and its mapping (Blakemore and Cooper 1970; Chapman and Stryker 1993
;
Sengpiel et al. 1999
; Singer et al.
1981
). One suggestion has been that the dependence on visual experience after eye-opening is an extension of activity-dependent processes occurring prior to eye-opening (or even in utero) since both
pharmacological blockade of neuronal activity or electrical stimulation
before eye-opening can disrupt the development of orientation tuning in
the ferret (Chapman and Gödecke 2000
;
Weliky and Katz 1997
). Normal patterned neuronal
activity appears to be important for the establishment and improvement
of orientation tuning both before and after eye-opening.
If neuronal activity is to influence cortical orientation tuning, it
has to have the appropriate spatiotemporal statistics whether these
come from visual driving or from spontaneous patterning (Feidler
et al. 1997; Miller et al. 1999
; van
Hateren and Ruderman 1998
; von der Malsburg
1973
). Our results challenge the assumption that visual
stimulation plays no role in patterning neuronal activity until the
eyes have opened. We show that, in the 2 wk prior to eye-opening in the
ferret, visual stimulation through the closed eyelids is able to
pattern neuronal activity effectively in both LGN and cortex. At this
age, spontaneous activity in the retina shows local correlations within
and between different functional classes of neurons, but the spatially
propagating waves of correlated spontaneous retinal activity have
broken down (see Wong 1999
).
Spontaneous retinal activity is relayed to the LGN and activates
geniculate neurons (Mooney et al. 1996; Weliky
and Katz 1999
). There is also evidence for an intrinsic
component to spontaneous activity in the LGN (McCormick et al.
1995
). An in vivo study of spontaneous activity in the neonatal
ferret LGN (Weliky and Katz 1999
) showed that the
statistics are broadly similar to those in the retina. Correlated
activity between neurons of the same type (ON-center vs.
OFF-center) is higher than between neurons of the opposite
type, and correlations between neurons activated by the same eye are
greater than that for neurons activated by different eyes.
(Interestingly, inter-ocular correlations were only present when visual
cortex was intact.) These multi-unit recordings showed spontaneous
bursts of geniculate activity occurring about twice a minute, which is
consistent with the level of spontaneous single-unit activity in our
preparation. However, our finding is that visual stimulation induces a
very different pattern of firing in the LGN. Not only is the mean level
higher, but visually elicited bursts can occur much more frequently
than twice a minute. The visually evoked activity is also temporally
synchronised to the stimulus, and this should have significant
implications for the patterns of correlated activity. We speculate that
if convergent thalamic activity is necessary for cortical neurons to
fire, local visual entrainment of geniculate neurons is the reason why
stimulation through the eyelids appears much more effective at driving
cortical cells than the spontaneous activity in the LGN.
Although we show that visual stimulation through the closed lids can pattern neuronal activity, we have not directly demonstrated whether this level of visual experience is important in normal development. However, the improvement in OSI with age seen in Figs. 5 and 6 indicates a possible role for through-the-lids experience. It will be interesting to see if dark rearing, prior to eye-opening, can affect the development of the visual system. Another important question pertaining to the emergence of orientation selectivity is to ask what circuitry underlies the earliest, relatively crude, orientation selectivity that is seen at P19-20: how different is receptive field structure at this age from that in more mature animals? Studies on the ferret should facilitate investigation of the relative contribution of spontaneous and of visually driven neuronal activity to the establishment and refinement of the circuits underlying orientation tuning in visual cortex.
Finally, the fact that closed eyelids are not necessarily a barrier to
visual stimulation (a finding echoing earlier observations) (Eysel et al. 1979; Huttenlocher 1967
;
Spear et al. 1978
) and the fact that orientation
selectivity persists with the eyelids closed suggests a new
interpretation of recent deprivation experiments. It is arguable that
the failure of lid suture to disturb the early development of
orientation maps (Crair et al. 1998
;
Gödecke and Bonhoeffer 1996
) actually reflects the
patterning of cortical activity that is possible with "closed eye"
visual experience. The role of visual experience in the early
development of visual cortex may have to be reconsidered.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
The authors thank Dr. David Tolhurst, Prof. Andrew Parker, and Dr. Bruce Cumming for help and discussions throughout the project, Dr. David Tolhurst and D. Smyth for help with software programming and data analysis, and D. Fleming for expert care of the ferrets. K. Krug was a Wellcome Prize Student and a Scholar of the "Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes." C. J. Akerman is a graduate student in the Wellcome Programme in Neuroscience.
This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust.
![]() |
FOOTNOTES |
---|
* K. Krug and C. J. Akerman contributed equally to this work.
Address for reprint requests: K. Krug, University Laboratory of Physiology, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PT, UK (E-mail: kristine.krug{at}physiol.ox.ac.uk).
Received 17 May 2000; accepted in final form 11 December 2000.
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|