Department of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Yan, Jun and Nobuo Suga. Corticofugal amplification of facilitative auditory responses of subcortical combination-sensitive neurons in the mustached bat. Recent studies on the bat's auditory system indicate that the corticofugal system mediates a highly focused positive feedback to physiologically "matched" subcortical neurons, and widespread lateral inhibition to physiologically "unmatched" subcortical neurons, to adjust and improve information processing. These findings have solved the controversy in physiological data, accumulated since 1962, of corticofugal effects on subcortical auditory neurons: inhibitory, excitatory, or both (an inhibitory effect is much more frequent than an excitatory effect). In the mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii parnellii, the inferior colliculus, medial geniculate body, and auditory cortex each have "FM-FM" neurons, which are "combination-sensitive" and are tuned to specific time delays (echo delays) of echo FM components from the FM components of an emitted biosonar pulse. FM-FM neurons are more complex in response properties than cortical neurons which primarily respond to single tones. In the present study, we found that inactivation of the entire FM-FM area in the cortex, including neurons both physiologically matched and unmatched with subcortical FM-FM neurons, on the average reduced the facilitative responses to paired FM sounds by 82% for thalamic FM-FM neurons and by 66% for collicular FM-FM neurons. The corticofugal influence on the facilitative responses of subcortical combination-sensitive neurons is much larger than that on the excitatory responses of subcortical neurons primarily responding to single tones. Therefore we propose the hypothesis that, in general, the processing of complex sounds by combination-sensitive neurons more heavily depends on the corticofugal system than that by single-tone sensitive neurons.
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Neurons in the deep layers of the auditory cortex
(AC) project to the medial geniculate body (MGB) or the inferior
colliculus (IC) (Huffman and Henson 1990; Saldana
et al. 1996
). The corticofugal projections are organized
tonotopically (Andersen et al. 1980
; Herbert et
al. 1991
). Physiological data of corticofugal effects on MGB
and IC neurons have been controversial: inhibitory (Amato et al.
1969
; Massopust and Ordy 1962
; Sun et al.
1996
; Watanabe et al. 1966
); excitatory
(Andersen et al. 1972
; Villa et al.
1991
), or both (Ryugo and Weinberger 1976
;
Sun et al. 1989
; Syka and Popelar 1984
).
In the mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii parnellii, it
first was found that cortical "FM-FM" neurons, which are
"combination-sensitive" and are tuned to particular echo delays,
mediate a highly focused positive feedback incorporated with widespread
lateral inhibition via the corticofugal system and that the
corticofugal system adjusts and improves auditory information
processing in the subcortical auditory nuclei (Suga et al.
1995; Yan and Suga 1996a
). These cortical
functions, named egocentric selection, (Suga et al.
1997
; Yan and Suga 1996a
) work not only for the
processing of echo delays but also for the processing of frequency
information in the mustached bat (Zhang et al. 1997
),
big brown bat (Yan and Suga 1998
), and cat (He
1997
), so that it may be a general function of the corticofugal system. As a matter of fact, corticofugal positive feedback associated with inhibition also has been found in the visual system
(Tsumoto et al. 1978
). These findings, indicating that
an inhibitory or excitatory corticofugal effect depends on a
topographic relationship between cortical and subcortical neurons, and
the study by Zhang and Suga (1997)
have solved the
long-lived controversy.
Muscimol is a potent agonist to -aminobutyric acid-A receptors,
which mediate synaptic inhibition (de Feudis 1978
;
Lester and Pesk 1979
). Zhang and Suga
(1997)
applied muscimol to a particular subdivision of the
primary auditory cortex, called the Doppler-shifted constant-frequency
(DSCF) processing area, and inactivated the corticofugal fibers
originating from this area. They found that such an inactivation,
including cortical neurons matched in frequency tuning with a given
subcortical DSCF neuron, evoked a prominent decrease in excitatory
responses (number of impulses/stimulus) of subcortical DSCF neurons to
single tones: 34% in the IC and 60% in the MGB on the average.
Gao and Suga (1998)
repeated the same experiments as
above with the big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus) and found
that the decrease in collicular responses to single tones was 38% on
the average.
FM-FM neurons tuned to specific time delays (echo delays) of echo FM
components from the FM components of an emitted biosonar pulse
(Kawasaki et al. 1988) have been found in the IC
(Mittmann and Wenstrup 1995
; Yan and Suga
1996b
), MGB (Olsen and Suga 1991
; Wenstrup and Grose 1995
), and AC (O'Neill and
Suga 1979
; Suga et al. 1978
, 1983
). In the AC,
they are clustered in the FM-FM (O'Neill and Suga 1979
;
Suga and O'Neill 1979
), dorsal fringe (DF) (Suga
and Horikawa 1986
), and ventral fringe (VF) areas
(Edamatsu et al. 1989
). These combination-sensitive
neurons are more complex in response properties than neurons primarily
responding to single tones because they show strong facilitative
responses to paired sounds with specific relationships in the
frequency, amplitude, and time domains.
The aim of our present paper is to report our finding that muscimol inactivation of the entire FM-FM area of the cortex, containing neurons both matched and unmatched in delay tuning with thalamic and collicular FM-FM neurons, reduces the facilitative responses of these subcortical neurons to paired FM sounds by a surprisingly large amount, that combination sensitivity of some subcortical neurons almost entirely depends on corticofugal feedback, and that the processing of complex sounds by combination-sensitive neurons depends more heavily on the corticofugal system than that by noncombination-sensitive neurons.
![]() |
METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Materials, surgery, recording of neural activity, acoustic
stimulation, and data acquisition were basically the same as those described elsewhere (Suga et al. 1983; Zhang and
Suga 1997
). The essential portions of these are summarized
below. Five adult mustached bats, P. parnellii parnellii,
from Jamaica were used for the present experiments. Under
neuroleptanalgesia (Innovar 4.08 mg/kg body wt), a 1.8-cm-long metal
post was glued onto the exposed dorsal surface of the bat's skull.
Four days after the surgery, the unanesthetized and untranquilized bat
was placed in a polyethylene form restraint suspended by an elastic
band at the center of a soundproof, echo-attenuated room maintained at
30-32°C. The head was immobilized by fixing the post to a metal rod
with set-screws and was adjusted to face directly at a condenser
loudspeaker located 74 cm away.
To record the auditory responses of FM-FM neurons, a tungsten-wire microelectrode with a tip diameter of 6-8 µm was inserted into the AC, MGB, or IC through holes of ~50 µm in diameter made in the skull. FM-FM neurons were identified by their combination sensitivity, delay tuning, best delays, and locations in the AC, MGB, and IC. A window discriminator was used to isolate action potentials of single neurons.
To excite FM-FM neurons, the parameters of a pair of FM sounds were set
to be similar to those of the FM components of species-specific biosonar signals. Each FM sound was 3.0-ms long and had a 0.5-ms rise-decay time. There were four types of FM sounds (FM1,
FM2, FM3, and FM4), which were
harmonically related to each other. In
FM1-FM4, the frequency swept downward by
either 6, 12, 18, or 24 kHz from the frequency at ~30, 61, 92, or 122 kHz, respectively. These FM sounds were generated by a
voltage-controlled oscillator, an electronic switch, and a voltage-ramp
generator. Sound amplitude was adjusted by an analog or digital
attenuator. A pair of these instruments was used to mimic the bat's
biosonar pulse and its echo. The paired FM sounds were delivered at a
rate of 5/s. Because the FM-FM neurons are tuned to particular time
delays (hereafter, echo delays) of FMn
(n = 2, 3, or 4) from FM1, not only frequency and amplitude of paired sounds, but also echo delay, was
varied manually or with a computer. A "delay scan" program was
used to control echo delay. The delay scan created 13 time blocks. The
duration of each block was 150 ms and was repeated at a rate of 6.7/s.
A 3.0-ms-long FM1 (pulse stimulus: P) was delivered alone
in the first block. A 3.0-ms-long FMn (echo
stimulus: E) was delivered alone in the 12th block. A P-E pair was
delivered in each of the 2nd to 11th blocks, for which an echo delay
was varied from 0t to 9
t.
t
was set at between 0.25 and 4.0 ms, depending on the best delay of E
from P to excite a given FM-FM neuron. No acoustic stimulus (N) was
delivered in the 13th block so that background discharges could be
counted. An identical delay scan was delivered 100 times at a rate of
0.5/s. The auditory responses to these stimuli were displayed as
peristimulus time (PST) or PST cumulative (PSTC) histograms.
After the electrophysiological mapping of the FM-FM area of the AC, a ~1.0 mm2 triangular hole was made in the skull over the FM-FM area with forceps, and a ~1.0-mm-long piece of vinyl tubing ~1.5 mm ID (hereafter a well) was placed over the hole. The well was filled with antibiotic (Furacin) ointment. Three to 6 days later, single thalamic or collicular FM-FM neurons, ipsilateral to the mapped FM-FM area, were recorded, and 0.20 µg muscimol (5-aminomethyl-3-hydroxyisoxazole, Sigma) in 0.2 µl saline solution was applied to the mapped FM-FM area with a 1.0-µl Hamilton microsyringe to inactivate the entire FM-FM area. Gelfoam was placed in the well to prevent leakage of muscimol and to increase the contact time with the cortical surface. To study the effect of cortical inactivation on the auditory responses of subcortical FM-FM neurons, the responses of the single subcortical neurons to FM sounds in the delay scan were recorded before, during, and after cortical inactivation.
Off-line data processing included plotting PST or PSTC histograms displaying these responses. Delay-response curves were based on the responses to 100 identical delay scans. The magnitude of auditory responses was expressed by the number of impulses per 100 identical stimuli after subtracting the background discharges counted in the last block of the 100 delay scans. A t-test was used to test the significance (P < 0.05) of the difference between the facilitative responses obtained before and after a muscimol application and between the facilitative responses of thalamic and collicular neurons.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
As previously reported (O'Neill and Suga 1979,
1982
; Suga et al. 1978
, 1983
), FM-FM neurons
commonly showed poor or no excitatory response to pulse FM1
(P) or echo FMn (E) delivered at the amplitude
necessary to evoke the best facilitative response, but a strong
facilitative response to a P-E pair with a specific E delay.
Inactivation of the FM-FM area in the AC with muscimol evoked a
prominent reduction in the facilitative responses of all 9 thalamic and
10 collicular FM-FM neurons studied, and evoked no change in their best
delays (BDs). (The sample size was small because of a difficulty in
long-term recording of single-unit activity. Nevertheless, the results
were consistent.)
Figure 1 shows such a reduction in the auditory responses of two thalamic (A and B) and one collicular neuron (C). They are selected for the figure because they responded to P alone and E alone. In A, the responses of a single thalamic FM-FM neuron to P alone and E alone were reduced by 47.2 and 24.0% by cortical inactivation, respectively. The response to a P-E pair with a 10.3-ms E delay was 302% larger than the sum of the responses to P alone and E alone. This facilitative response was reduced by 73.1% by cortical inactivation. In Fig. 1B, the responses of another thalamic FM-FM neuron to P alone and E alone were reduced by 90.6 and 88.0% by cortical inactivation, respectively. Its response to a P-E pair with 4.0-ms E delay was 254% larger than the sum of the responses to P alone and E alone and was reduced by 97.7% by cortical inactivation. The reduction of facilitative response by >90% was observed in four thalamic neurons and one collicular neuron. In Fig. 1C, the change in the responses of a collicular FM-FM neuron to P alone and E alone evoked by cortical inactivation was insignificant, but the reduction (67.2%) in the facilitative response to a P-E pair was significant.
|
The amount of reduction in facilitative response ranged from 65.5 to
99.9% (mean ± SD: 82.1 ± 14.0%) for the nine thalamic FM-FM neurons and from 30.0 to 92.9% (65.5 ± 19.5%) for the 10 collicular FM-FM neurons. The difference in reduction between the
thalamic and collicular neurons is significant (P < 0.05). The responses to P alone and E alone were so small that
percentage reduction in these responses was influenced greatly by
background discharges as well as by cortical inactivation. The changes
in the responses to P alone and E alone during the cortical
inactivation were respectively 4.9 ± 81.6% and 34.8 ± 52.7% for the thalamic neurons, and
21 ± 70% and
28.8 ± 27.0% for the collicular neurons. The difference between these mean
values was insignificant.
These data indicate the following: 1) The corticofugal system amplifies thalamic facilitative responses by 5.6 times (100/18) and collicular facilitative responses by 2.9 times (100/34) on the average. 2) Normal auditory responses would be very weak without these two-step amplifications by the corticocollicular and corticothalamic projections. 3) In nearly half of the thalamic FM-FM neurons, almost all responses to single and paired sounds depend on the corticofugal system, i.e., on the feedback loop consisting of the ascending and descending systems.
The amount of reduction by muscimol was largest for the response to the P-E stimulus at the best delay of a given subcortical FM-FM neuron, so that its delay-tuning curve tended to be less tuned during cortical inactivation. No significant shift in best delay was observed. Figure 2 shows the delay-response curves of four subcortical FM-FM neurons that were affected somewhat differently from each other by cortical inactivation. In five of the nine thalamic neurons, a delay-response curve was significantly lowered, but was not eliminated (Fig. 2A). However, it was eliminated almost completely for the remaining four thalamic neurons, indicating that their responses almost entirely depended on the corticofugal feedback (Fig. 2B).
|
FM-FM neurons commonly respond, if they respond at all, more strongly
to E alone than to P alone (Fig. 2, B-D) (Olsen and Suga 1991; Yan and Suga 1996b
). The response to
E alone, as well as the response to a P-E pair, commonly was reduced by
cortical inactivation (Fig. 2, B and C). In Fig.
2B, the response to a P-E pair with a 0- to 2-ms E delay was
less than that to E alone. This is very common, as previously reported
(Olsen and Suga 1991
).
The effect of cortical inactivation was generally much less on collicular neurons than on thalamic neurons. The delay-response curve of the collicular neuron in Fig. 2C became rather flat after cortical inactivation. In thalamic and collicular neurons, a delay-response curve in a partially recovered condition was noticed to be broader than that in the control condition (Fig. 2, A-C). The data shown in Fig. 2D is exceptional in that the delay-response curve was inverted by cortical inactivation. The response to E alone was not reduced by cortical inactivation, but the response to a P-E pair was.
Rates of background discharges ranged between 1.9 and 9.4/s (5.1 ± 3.4/s) for the 9 thalamic neurons and between 10.6 and 11.1/s
(4.3 ± 3.5/s) for the 10 collicular neurons. Cortical
inactivation reduced the background discharges of most subcortical
neurons, but not in the others: 30.8 ± 32.9% for the 9 thalamic neurons and
18.8 ± 61.0% for the 10 collicular
neurons.
Figure 3 shows the time courses of muscimol's effect on auditory responses and background discharges of a single thalamic (A) and a single collicular neuron (C), and the average time courses for the 9 thalamic (B) and 10 collicular neurons (D). The reduction in facilitative response started to appear in the thalamic and collicular neurons within 5.3 or 7.8 min after muscimol application, respectively. The amount of reduction increased rapidly. The maximum reductions based on the averaged time courses in Fig. 3, B and D (75.0% for thalamic neurons and 54.3% for collicular neurons) were smaller than the means of maximum reductions in the individual neurons (82.1 ± 14.0% for thalamic neurons and 65.5 ± 19.5% for collicular neurons), because the latency for a maximum reduction differed from neuron to neuron, ranging between 54 and 190 min for the thalamic neurons and between 28 and 110 min for the collicular neurons. The mean latencies of 50% recovery were 218 ± 78.0 and 177 ± 82.6 min for the thalamic and collicular neurons, respectively. This difference is statistically insignificant (P > 0.05).
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Inactivation of the corticofugal system by muscimol
One may consider the possibility that the reduction in
subcortical auditory response by muscimol is not due to the
inactivation of corticofugal fibers from the FM-FM area in the AC but
the inactivation of subcortical neurons due to diffusion of muscimol
from the AC to the MGB and IC. Muscimol (0.20 µg) applied to the
FM-FM area did not in any way reduce the responses of thalamic DSCF
neurons located immediately ventrolateral to thalamic FM-FM neurons but did reduce the responses of thalamic FM-FM neurons. Muscimol applied to
the DSCF area locating immediately posterolateral to the FM-FM area did
not in any way reduce the responses of thalamic FM-FM neurons but did
reduce the responses of thalamic DSCF neurons (Zhang and Suga
1997). The effect of muscimol specifically depended on the
relationship in response properties between the inactivated cortical
and the studied subcortical neurons. These control experiments indicate
that the effect of muscimol described in the present paper was not due
to diffusion of muscimol to the MGB and IC but to the inactivation of
the corticofugal fibers originating from the FM-FM area.
Muscimol of 0.20 µg applied to the FM-FM area evoked a prominent
temporary deficit in time-interval (echo-delay) discrimination but no
deficit in frequency discrimination. On the other hand, the same dose
of muscimol applied to the DSCF area evoked a temporary deficit in
frequency discrimination but no deficit in time-interval discrimination
(Riquimaroux et al. 1991). The effect of muscimol specifically depended on the relationship in function between the
inactivated cortical subdivision and the tested behavioral task. The
distance between the FM-FM and DSCF areas in the AC is shorter than
that between the FM-FM area and the MGB. Therefore the lack of effect
of muscimol applied to the FM-FM area on both thalamic DSCF neurons and
frequency discrimination indicates that muscimol did not diffuse to the
DSCF area and accordingly also not to the MGB.
Our conclusion is supported or favored by the data obtained by
Villa et al. (1991) from the cat that showed that
inactivation of the entire AC by cooling reduced the auditory responses
of thalamic auditory neurons. The observation that the reduction in
response of thalamic and collicular neurons began simultaneously (Fig.
3) also favors our conclusion.
Focal electrical activation and focal lidocaine inactivation of the
FM-FM area of the AC, respectively, increased and decreased the
facilitative responses of "physiologically matched" collicular (Yan and Suga 1996a) and thalamic FM-FM neurons
(Suga et al. 1995
). In the IC, the amount of reduction
due to focal cortical inactivation was ~62% (Yan and Suga
1996a
), which is not significantly different from the present
data, 65.5 ± 19.5%. The reduction of facilitative responses in
the IC and MGB is apparently due to the inactivation of the
corticofugal system evoked by muscimol applied to the cortical FM-FM
area.
Did muscimol evoke general suppression of the brain?
An inactivation of the cortical FM-FM area with muscimol dramatically reduced the facilitative responses of subcortical FM-FM neurons. Therefore in spite of the preceding control experiments, one still may consider the possibility that the reduction was due to the inactivation of cortical areas adjacent to the FM-FM area, a vegetablized animal, and/or general suppression (i.e., suppression of the reticular activation system). However, this possibility is nonexistent, as explained in the following text.
In the AC, the DSCF area is located immediately ventrolateral to the
FM-FM area and shows an extremely fine representation of frequencies
between 60.6 and 62.3 kHz. The DSCF area apparently is related to fine
frequency analysis (Suga and Manabe 1982; Suga et
al. 1987
). As already described, 0.2 µg muscimol
applied to the FM-FM area reduces neither the responses of subcortical
DSCF neurons (Zhang and Suga 1997
) nor the frequency
discrimination ability (Riquimaroux et al. 1991
).
Therefore the inactivation of cortical areas adjacent to the FM-FM area
is very limited.
Cortical focal inactivation by microinjection of lidocaine and cortical
focal activation by electrical microstimulation indicate that the
corticofugal positive feedback from the FM-FM area is extremely
specific to physiologically matched subcortical FM-FM neurons and that
the inactivation or activation of adjacent cortical areas has no effect
on the responses of subcortical FM-FM neurons (Suga et al.
1995; Yan and Suga 1996a
). Therefore it is
extremely unlikely that the reduction in the facilitative responses
reported in our present paper was due to the inactivation of cortical
areas adjacent to the FM-FM area.
The cortical FM-FM area was inactivated with 0.20 µg muscimol in
exactly the same way for the previous behavioral (Riquimaroux et
al. 1991) and the present electrophysiological experiments. In
the behavioral experiment, mustached bats treated with muscimol performed a frequency-discrimination task just as well as untreated mustached bats did. In our present electrophysiological experiments, the bats treated with muscimol moved occasionally during single-unit recording, just as untreated mustached bats did, and caused single-unit responses to disappear. The bats treated with 0.2 µg muscimol were
not vegetables. An application of 0.2 µg muscimol to the cortical
FM-FM area did not reduce the responses of subcortical DSCF neurons
(Zhang and Suga 1997
). Therefore, the reduction of facilitative responses reported in our present paper is not due to
general suppression of the AC.
Places where the responses of FM-FM neurons are modulated by the corticofugal system
The mustached bat emits orientation sounds (biosonar
"pulses"). Each pulse consists of constant frequency (CF) and FM
components. Distance information is carried by a delay of the echo FM
components from the pulse FM components (that is, the echo delay).
FM-FM neurons, tuned to particular echo delays, have been found in the IC (Mittmann and Wenstrup 1995; Yan and Suga
1996b
), the MGB (Olsen and Suga 1991
;
Wenstrup and Grose 1995
), and the AC (O'Neill
and Suga 1979
, 1982
; Suga et al. 1978
, 1983
).
The responses of these to an echo FMn
(n = 2, 3, or 4) are facilitated by the pulse
FM1 emitted by the bat when the echo
FMn returns from the target at a particular
distance, that is, with a particular time delay (Kawasaki et al.
1988
). The neural mechanisms for creating the response
properties of FM-FM neurons have not yet been completely explored.
However, it is clear that the essential components involved in the
mechanisms are delay lines and coincidence detectors. Delay lines
neurally shift the response to the pulse FM1. Long delay lines are created by different durations of inhibition that evokes a
rebound off-response. Coincidence detectors detect the coincidence in
time between the off-response and the excitatory response to an
acoustically delayed echo FMn (Suga
1990
). When antagonists to inhibitory synaptic transmitters are
iontophoretically injected into the IC, the delay tuning of collicular
as well as cortical FM-FM neurons is shortened or eliminated (
Leroy and Wenstrup 1998
; Saitoh and Suga
1995
). Therefore, the response properties of FM-FM neurons are
most likely to be first created in the IC and are further shaped in the
MGB and the AC (Suga and Yan 1996b
; Suga et al.
1995
). Accordingly, the corticofugal influences on collicular
FM-FM neurons reported here would not likely be due to changes in the
subcollicular nuclei but rather to changes in the IC.
Corticofugal signals may potentially influence the activity of cochlear
hair cells through the olivocochlear bundle (Huffman and Henson
1990; Saldana et al. 1996
; Warr
1992
). Therefore it is impossible to deny completely the
possibility that the reduction in the facilitative responses of
collicular FM-FM neurons reported in our present paper was at least
partially due to changes in the responses of subcollicular neurons,
including peripheral ones, even if FM-FM neurons indeed are created
first in the IC, not in the subcollicular auditory nuclei. The
functional significance of the corticofugal system in signal processing
in the subcollicular nuclei and the cochlea remains unknown.
Unilateral versus bilateral inactivation of the corticofugal system
Corticocollicular fibers bilaterally project to the IC in
cats (Andersen et al. 1980; Rouiller et al.
1989
), rats (Herrera et al. 1994
; Saldana
et al. 1996
), and guinea pigs (Feliciano and Potashner
1995
). The ipsilateral projection is much heavier in density,
much more extensive in area, and much more topographically organized
than the contralateral projection. Corticothalamic fibers project only
ipsilaterally to the MGB and the reticular nucleus (Bajo et al.
1995
; Ojima 1994
; Rouiller and de
Ribaupierre 1990
). These anatomic data clearly indicate that
ipsilateral corticofugal modulation would be much larger than
contralateral corticofugal modulation in the IC and MGB.
The directional sensitivity curves of cortical FM-FM neurons suggest
that they are excited binaurally by the pulse FM1 but are
excited monaurally (contralaterally) by an echo
FMn (Suga et al. 1990). In other
words, the processing of target distance information by FM-FM neurons
in the IC, MGB, and AC appears to be mostly performed homolaterally.
As a matter of fact, a unilateral inactivation of the cortical FM-FM area evoked a large decrease in the facilitative responses of FM-FM neurons in the ipsilateral IC and MGB as reported in our present paper. We don't know yet whether bilateral inactivation of the cortical FM-FM areas evokes a further reduction in facilitative responses. Our finding of a larger reduction in the MGB than in the IC (82% in the MGB vs. 66% in the IC on the average) indicates that the facilitative responses of FM-FM neurons are amplified not only by the corticocollicular projection but also by the corticothalamic projection. If the bilateral inactivation evokes a larger reduction in the IC than the unilateral inactivation does, it will evoke an extremely large reduction in thalamic facilitative responses.
Corticofugal amplification for FM-FM and DSCF neurons
In the AC, FM-FM neurons are clustered in three separate
areas: the FM-FM (O'Neill and Suga 1979; Suga
and O'Neill 1979
), dorsal fringe (Suga and Horikawa
1986
), and ventral fringe areas (Edamatsu et al.
1989
). We applied muscimol only to the FM-FM area, the largest
among the three, because inactivation of all these areas would require
a large amount of muscimol, which could spread to other brain tissue.
The reduction of facilitative response due to inactivation of the FM-FM
area was 92.3-99.9% in four out of the nine thalamic neurons but was
65.5-79.1% in the remaining five. If all corticofugal fibers from
these three cortical areas were inactivated with muscimol, the mean
reduction in facilitative response might become larger than 82.1%. H. Teng and N. Suga (unpublished data) injected 66-132 nl of 1%
lidocaine into the FM-FM area of the cortex and frequently observed
that the responses of thalamic FM-FM neurons to a P-E pair or E alone
nearly were abolished. It appears that combination sensitivity of some
subcortical neurons almost entirely depends on the corticofugal
feedback. The neural mechanisms to produce the response properties of
FM-FM neurons are not so simple as previously described, although the
basic mechanisms must include delay lines and coincidence detectors as
previously described (Olsen and Suga 1991
; Suga
1990
; Suga et al. 1995
).
FM-FM neurons are tuned to specific echo delays, i.e., target distances
(O'Neill and Suga 1979, 1982
; Suga et al. 1978
,
1983
), whereas DSCF neurons are sharply tuned to specific
frequencies (Suga and Manabe 1982
). Although DSCF
neurons show facilitative response to paired sounds (Fitzpatrick
et al. 1993
), FM-FM neurons have more complex response
properties than DSCF neurons. The effect of cortical inactivation with
muscimol was significantly larger on subcortical FM-FM neurons than on
subcortical DSCF neurons (Zhang and Suga 1997
):
82.1 ± 14.0 (n = 9) versus 59.8 ± 15.8 (n = 5) for the MGB (P < 0.001) and
65.5 ± 19.5 (n = 10) versus 33.5 ± 7.8 (n = 6) for the IC (P < 0.001).
Response properties of combination-sensitive neurons such as FM-FM
neurons greatly depend on facilitation, i.e., nonlinear amplification,
which mostly is mediated by the corticofugal feedback (Yan and
Suga 1996; present paper). Therefore, it is quite reasonable that cortical inactivation affects facilitative responses of FM-FM neurons much more than it does single tone responses of DSCF neurons. A
possible general principle in auditory information processing that
emerged from our data are that the processing of complex sounds by
combination-sensitive neurons more heavily depends on the corticofugal
system than does sound processing by noncombination sensitive neurons.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
We thank Dr. J. Wenstrup and N. Laleman for comments on the manuscript.
This work was supported by National Institute of Deafness and Other Communications Disorders Grant DC-00175.
Present address of J. Yan: Dept. of Immunology and Molecular Genetics, Mt. Sinai Hospital Research Institute, University of Toronto, 600 University Ave., Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada.
![]() |
FOOTNOTES |
---|
Address for reprint requests: N. Suga, Dept. of Biology, Washington University, 1 Brooks Dr., St. Louis, MO 63130.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 7 August 1998; accepted in final form 29 October 1998.
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|