Absence of a Prevalent Laminar Distribution of IPSPs in Association Cortical Neurons of Cat
Diego Contreras,
Niklaus Dürmüller, and
Mircea Steriade
Laboratoire de Neurophysiologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Quebec G1K 7P4, Canada
 |
ABSTRACT |
Contreras, Diego, Niklaus Dürmüller, and Mircea Steriade. Absence of a prevalent laminar distribution of IPSPs in association cortical neurons of cat. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 2742-2753, 1997. The depth distribution of inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) was studied in cat suprasylvian (association) cortex in vivo. Single and dual simultaneous intracellular recordings from cortical neurons were performed in the anterior part of suprasylvian gyrus (area 5). Synaptic responses were obtained by stimulating the suprasylvian cortex, 2-3 mm anterior to the recording site, as well as the thalamic lateral posterior (LP) nucleus. Neurons were recorded from layers 2 to 6 and were classified as regular spiking (RS, n = 132), intrinsically bursting (IB, n = 24), and fast spiking (FS, n = 4). Most IB cells were located in deep layers (below 0.7 mm, n = 19), but we also found some IB cells more superficially (between 0.2 and 0.5 mm, n = 5). Deeply lying corticothalamic neurons were identified by their antidromic invasion on thalamic stimulation. Neurons responded with a combination of excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) and IPSPs to both cortical and thalamic stimulation. No consistent relation was found between cell type or cell depth and the amplitude or duration of the IPSPs. In response to thalamic stimulation, RS cells had IPSPs of 7.9 ± 0.9 (SE) mV amplitude and 88.9 ± 6.4 ms duration. In IB cells, IPSPs elicited by thalamic stimulation had 7.4 ± 1.3 mV amplitude and 84.7 ± 14.3 ms duration. The differences between the two (RS and IB) groups were not statistically significant. Compared with thalamically elicited inhibitory responses, cortical stimulation evoked IPSPs with higher amplitude (12.3 ± 1.7 mV) and longer duration (117 ± 17.3 ms) at all depths. Both cortically and thalamically evoked IPSPs were predominantly monophasic. Injections of Cl
fully reversed thalamically as well as cortically evoked IPSPs and revealed additional late synaptic components in response to cortical stimulation. These data show that the amount of feed forward and feedback inhibition to cat's cortical association cells is not orderly distributed to distinct layers. Thus local cortical microcircuitry goes beyond the simplified structure determined by cortical layers.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Studies of the actions induced by the major excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters in the cortex, namely glutamate and
-aminobutyric acid (GABA) (Connors 1992
; McCormick et al. 1993
; Nicoll et al. 1990
), mainly focused on the basic mechanisms involved in receptor activation and postsynaptic actions at the single-cell level. To understand the functioning of cortical microcircuitry, it is essential to determine the amount of excitatory and inhibitory inputs from specific thalamic and cortical projections. Excitatory inputs to cortical cells originate from a number of cortical and subcortical regions, while inhibitory inputs mainly arise in local smooth stellate cells that make symmetrical synaptic contacts, positive for the GABA-synthesizing enzyme glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) (reviewed in DeFelipe and Fariñas 1992
). Inhibition is essential for the organization of receptive fields in the somatosensory (Mountcastle 1957
) and visual (Hubel and Wiesel 1959
) cortices, and tonic background inhibition is essential in the nervous system because its suppression may readily lead to epilepsy. In vitro, cortically evoked inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) in cortical cells have been shown to be due to the activation of GABAA and GABAB receptors (Connors et al. 1988
), whereas, in vivo, the amplitude of GABAB responses is relatively much smaller (Contreras et al. 1996
). One approach to understand functional microcircuits in the cortex is to quantify inhibition and excitation in relation to different cortical layers. Studies of visual cortex in vivo (Douglas and Martin 1991
) and motor cortex in vitro (Kang et al. 1994
; vanBrederode and Spain 1995
) assessed the laminar distribution of inhibitory inputs and proposed general rules for the distribution of these inputs. We have explored the laminar distribution of inhibitory responses in a nonprimary neocortical area of cat, the association suprasylvian area 5, in which cortical and thalamic inputs are more distributed (Avendaño et al. 1985
, 1988
; Herkenham 1980
; Jones 1985
). Our study shows that the strength of inhibition associated to cortical or thalamic inputs does not depend on the laminar position, nor the electrophysiological type of neurons.
 |
METHODS |
Experiments were carried out on adult cats (2.5-3.5 kg) of either sex, anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (35 mg/kg). All wounds and pressure points were infiltrated with lidocaine. Animals were paralyzed with gallamine triethiodide and artificially ventilated. End-tidal CO2 (3.5-3.7%) and heart rate were continuously monitored. Body temperature was maintained at 37-39°C. The depth of the anesthesia was maintained by additional doses of the same anesthetic, to keep a constant picture of high-amplitude low-frequency waves in the electroencephalogram (EEG).
For intracellular recordings, the surface of the suprasylvian gyrus was exposed and bathed in mineral oil to prevent desiccation. The stability of the recordings was ensured by bilateral pneumothorax, drainage of the cisterna magna, hip suspension, and filling the holes made for recording with a solution of 4% agar. Glass micropipettes were inserted perpendicularly in the cortex. The pipettes were filled with a solution of potassium acetate (KAc, 3 M), or potassium chloride (KCl, 3 or 1.5 M), and had DC resistances on the order of 35-45 M
. The depth of the pipettes was read on the display of the micromanipulator. A high-impedance amplifier (band-pass of 0-5 kHz) with active bridge circuitry was used to record and inject current into the cells. The signals were recorded on an eight-channel tape with band-pass of 0-9 kHz and posteriorly digitized at 20 kHz for off-line computer analysis. The EEG was recorded focally, from the vicinity of intracellularly recorded neurons, by means of coaxial electrodes with exposed areas of 0.2 mm separated by 0.6 mm. For monopolar EEG recordings, the indifferent electrode was placed in the neck muscles.
Stimulating coaxial electrodes were stereotaxically inserted in the thalamic lateroposterior (LP) nucleus and, under visual control, 2-3 mm anteriorly to the recording pipette in the suprasylvian cortical area 5 (Fig. 1). Stimulating electrodes were coaxial, with the ring at the surface and the tip at a depth of 0.8-1 mm, and they had the same characteristics as the recording ones (see above). Stimuli were applied with intensities ranging from 0.05 to 0.2 mA and a duration of 0.1 ms.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| FIG. 1.
Physiological identification of cortical cells and measurements of inhibitory postsynaptic potential (IPSP). A: cell responding antidromically to either cortical or thalamic stimuli. In this and all following figures, cortical stimuli are abbreviated Cx and marked by a triangle, whereas thalamic lateral posterior (LP) stimuli are abbreviated Th and marked by a filled circle. Left panel: Cx stimuli at depolarized Vm ( 55 mV, under +1 nA DC) and hyperpolarized Vm ( 95 mV, under 0.7 nA DC). Antidromic spike was followed by an excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) and by an IPSP under depolarizing current. Hyperpolarization completely reversed the IPSP and blocked antidromic invasion. Right panel: responses to Th stimuli at the 2 Vm levels. The Cx- and Th-evoked antidromic and orthodromic spikes are expanded in insets. Two superimposed traces in each case. Below, the scheme shows the experimental paradigm used throughout the experiments. Also in the scheme are indicated the marginal gyrus (marg), the cruciate sulcus (s.cru), and the ectosylvian gyrus (ecto). Anterior is to the left, posterior is to the right. The 2 micropipettes were 2-5 mm apart in the anteroposterior axis of anterior suprasylvian gyrus (area 5), bipolar stimulating electrodes were placed 2-3 mm in front of the most anterior cell as well as in the thalamic LP nucleus. B: a different cell responded with an IPSP to thalamic stimulation. IPSP duration was measured at its half amplitude (thick horizontal line) and IPSP amplitude was measured at its peak (vertical dotted line) and from rest Vm (horizontal dotted line). See other details in text.
|
|
At the end of the experiments the animals were given a lethal doses of pentobarbital.
 |
RESULTS |
Database and cellular identification
Results are based on 160 cortical cells from the cortical suprasylvian area 5. Cells were classified as regular spiking (RS, n = 132), intrinsically bursting (IB, n = 24), or fast spiking (FS, n = 4) according to their responses to depolarizing current pulses, following criteria established in vitro (Connors et al. 1982
; McCormick et al. 1985
) and in vivo (Nuñez et al. 1993
). The recordings that were used for the database and analysis had stable membrane potentials (Vm), more negative than
55 mV (but Fig. 3A), for at least 15 min, and overshooting action potentials. Cells were located in layers 2 to 6 as estimated by reading the microdrive position display and using the cytoarchitectonic study of Hassler and Muhs-Clement (1964)
. This estimation of neuronal depth had an error of <15%, compared with the location of intracellularly stained neurons in areas 5 and 7 (Contreras and Steriade 1995
; Steriade et al. 1993a
). In a representative sample of 33 cells (including RS and IB cells), the resting membrane potential was
70 ± 1.6 mV, the amplitude of action potentials was 78 ± 1.4 mV, and the input resistance was 25.5 ± 4.1 M
(estimated by applying square hyperpolarizing current pulses at the resting Vm).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| FIG. 3.
Superficial and deep cells in area 5 may display similar IPSPs in response to thalamic LP stimulation. Responses of 2 regular spiking (RS) cells at 0.3 mm (A) and 1.3 mm (B) depth to thalamic stimulation. Vm was displaced by DC, and 2 traces superimposed for each Vm. Left voltage-current (V-I) plots (in A and B) show the Vm at rest (+), at the peak of the IPSP (15 ms in A and 30 ms in B; ) and at 100 ms after the stimulus ( ) for the different currents. Values of Vm were fit by regression lines (rest,  ; IPSP peak, ···; IPSP at 100 ms, - - -). Right plots (in A and B) show amplitude of the IPSP with respect to Vm at the peak ( ) and at 100 ms ( ).
|
|
Cells responded to thalamic and cortical stimulation with a combination of excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) and IPSP, reflecting the activation of mono- and polysynaptic circuits. Some neurons were activated antidromically from the thalamus (n = 31) or from the cortex (n = 18). Among them, we found cells that were backfired from both the cortex and the thalamus (n = 10), as shown in Fig. 1A depicting a neuron located at a depth of 1.1 mm. Cortical volleys were delivered at 2-3 mm in front of the recorded cell. When applied at a depolarized Vm (
55 mV, +1 nA DC), cortical stimuli elicited an antidromic spike (0.3-ms latency) followed by an EPSP (1.2-ms latency) that was suprathreshold for firing an action potential (Fig. 1A, Cx, stimulus marked by a triangle). The EPSP was cut short by an IPSP that had a peak amplitude (at 18 ms) of 17.5 mV (measured from
60 mV) and a duration of 95 ms (at half amplitude). In the same neuron (Fig. 1A), cortical stimulation failed to display antidromic invasion at a hyperpolarized Vm (
95 mV,
0.7 nA DC) that increased the amplitude of the EPSP and reversed the IPSP. The composite but constant nature of Cx-evoked PSPs was shown by the stereotyped shape of the superimposed traces in Fig. 1A at both Vms. However, some aspects of IPSP's shape may be ascribed to the polysynaptic nature of the activation and not necessarily to different GABAergic components. Thalamic stimulation (Fig. 1A, Th, stimulus marked by a filled circle) elicited in the same neuron a similar series of events, with antidromic invasion (0.3-ms latency) followed by orthodromic activation (1.7-ms latency). The Th-evoked IPSP had a peak amplitude of 13 mV (at 23 ms, measured from
60 mV) and a duration of 90 ms (at half amplitude). An example of an IPSP triggered by thalamic stimulation (Th, dot) is shown in Fig. 1B to illustrate how measurements were taken from the evoked IPSP: the dotted vertical line indicates the amplitude at the peak, selected by visual inspection, whereas the duration of the IPSP was taken at half amplitude (thick horizontal line). The IPSP depicted in Fig. 1B had a latency of 3.3 ms, the peak was at 16.6 ms, the duration was 67 ms, and it was not preceded by an EPSP. Maximum inhibitory responses were obtained by increasing the intensity of stimulation until reaching a value beyond which increasing intensity did not elicit a further increase in the amplitude of the response.
We found no statistically significant difference between the peak time (P > 0.61), amplitude (P > 0.55), and duration (P > 0.57) of IPSPs elicited in RS and IB cells (Mann-Whitney U test). Therefore the values obtained for the cortically and thalamically elicited IPSPs in these two cellular classes are pooled and shown in Table 1.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Values of IPSPs evoked by cortical and thalamic stimulation in a sample of 60 cells from layers 2 to 6 in suprasylvian area 5
|
|
Distribution of inhibition according to depth
We used two different approaches to compare the inhibitory input among cells at different depths. In the first type of analyses, we compared cells at different depths recorded from successive tracks in the same area, whereas, in the second type of analyses, we compared cells located at the same depth and recorded simultaneously <2-3 mm apart in the anteroposterior axis.
An example of the distribution of amplitude and duration of Th-evoked IPSPs is shown in Fig. 2. Different symbols represent cells from different animals (see legend) that were connected by a trace to facilitate visualizing the variability within each experiment. The top plot represents the amplitude (y-axis) versus the cortical depth (x-axis) of each cell, whereas the bottom plot represents the duration of the IPSPs from the same cells. There was no preferential distribution of IPSP amplitude or duration according to depth.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| FIG. 2.
Distribution of thalamically evoked IPSPs' amplitude and duration in the depth of the cortex. Example of tracks from 5 different cats; the legend indicates the cat number (3, 11, etc.) for each. The most superficial cell was recorded at ~200 µm and the deepest at ~1,550 µm. Plots show the lack of a preferential distribution of IPSPs' amplitudes (top plot) or duration (bottom plot) in relation to the depth in the association cortical area 5. Absence of IPSPs around 1.1 mm is only apparent as IPSPs at that depth were found in several cats but not in those experiments selected for this figure.
|
|
Not only did cells at similar depths show different IPSP characteristics, but also cells located far apart in the vertical axis of cortex had similar features of IPSPs. This was a constant finding and is illustrated by the example of Fig. 3. Two RS cells were recorded along the same track, one at a depth of 0.3 mm (Fig. 3A), the other at 1.3 mm (Fig. 3B). Both the superficial and the deep cell displayed IPSPs in response to thalamic LP stimulation, with latencies of 5 and 8 ms, respectively, that were not preceded by a visible EPSP. The IPSPs from both cells had similar amplitudes (measured at
65 mV) and durations (66 ms in the superficial cell, and 64 ms in the deeply lying cell). The degree of involvement of GABAA-activated conductances was inferred indirectly by the decrease in input resistance (Rin) during the peak of the IPSP, as compared with the Rin preceding the stimulation. The Rin was estimated from the slope of the regression line fitted to the voltage-current (V-I) plots (Fig. 3, left plots in A and B). Voltage values for the V-I plots were obtained from 10 ms before the stimulus (+), at the peak of IPSP (
), and 100 ms after the stimulus (
). At rest, the superficial cell (Fig. 3A) had a Rin of 21 M
, which decreased to 5 M
(72% drop) during the peak of the IPSP, and recovered to 20.5 M
at 100 ms. In the deep cell (Fig. 3B), the Rin at rest was 26 M
, at the peak of the IPSP it decreased to 9 M
(65% drop), and was 20.5 M
at 100 ms. By displacing the Vm with DC, the peak of the IPSP reversed at
66 mV in the superficial cell (Fig. 3A, right plot,
), and it reversed at
81 mV in the deep cell (Fig. 3B, right plot,
). The late phase of the IPSP (at 100 ms,
) reversed at
73 mV in the superficial cell and at
87 mV in the deep cell.
Intrinsically bursting cells
In several descents through area 5, IB cells were mostly encountered deeper than 0.7 mm (n = 19), but a smaller number of IB cells (n = 5) was located between 0.2 and 0.5 mm depth. The responses to thalamic stimulation of two superficial IB cells are illustrated in Fig. 4. The superficial cell in Fig. 4A was located at a depth of 0.2 mm and discharged typical spike bursts during spontaneous spindle oscillations (Fig. 4A2), similarly to the spindle-related bursts in deeply lying (1-1.5 mm) IB cells of area 5 (see Fig. 7 in Steriade et al. 1993b
). Thalamic stimulation (Fig. 4A1) triggered an EPSP, with a latency of 3 ms, giving rise to an orthodromic spike that was followed by an IPSP with an amplitude of 6 mV (at a Vm of
60 mV) and a duration of 68 ms at half amplitude. Interestingly, spontaneous activity related to spindling generated strong bursting (Fig. 4A2), whereas thalamic electrical stimulation gave rise to single spikes followed by inhibition. This difference is possibly due to the fact that, in contrast to spontaneous spindle-related inputs, electrical stimuli to the thalamus readily recruit local cortical inhibition by backfiring corticothalamic axons. That cortical stimulation entrains stronger inhibition than thalamic stimulation is shown by IPSPs with higher amplitudes and longer durations triggered by cortical volleys (see Table 1). The other superficial IB cell fired spike bursts in response to depolarizing current pulses of increasing amplitude (Fig. 4B2). This cell was located at a depth of 0.25 mm and responded to thalamic stimulation with an EPSP at a latency of 4 ms, which was cut short by an IPSP of 8-mV amplitude (at
60 mV) and lasting for 70 ms. The postinhibitory burst in Fig. 4B may well originate from a low-threshold Ca2+ spike (LTS) but, at least in guinea pig frontal cortex, such LTSs were only found in deep layers and were absent from superficial layers (de la Peña and Geijo-Barrientos 1996). In addition to intrinsic factors, such as LTSs, synchronous excitatory inputs at the return of evoked hyperpolarizations may be taken in consideration, as was previously shown for the spontaneously occurring long-lasting hyperpolarizations of the slow oscillation (Contreras and Steriade 1995
; Steriade et al. 1993a
).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| FIG. 4.
Intrinsically bursting cells were also located in superficial layers. A1: superimposed responses to thalamic stimulation of an intrinsically bursting (IB) cell at rest ( 64 mV, indicated by arrow) located at 200-µm depth, detail of the early response shown above. A2: spontaneous bursts during spontaneous spindle oscillations (displaced horizontally and vertically for clarity). B1: responses to thalamic stimulation of an IB cell located at 250-µm depth at different DC levels (Vm rest = 70 mV, indicated by arrow). B2: responses of the same cell to depolarizing pulses of increasing amplitude (from bottom to top).
|
|

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| FIG. 7.
Two deeply lying cells recorded simultaneously are characterized by different amounts of inhibitory input. Cell 1 (left column) and cell 2 (right column) were at depths of 1.2 and 1 mm, respectively. Cell 1 showed a smaller amplitude and duration IPSP to both cortical and thalamic stimulation. Stimuli applied during 2 different current levels, as indicated.
|
|
Dual impalements
To directly compare the amplitude of the inhibitory input to different cells, triggered by the same stimuli, we recorded pairs of cortical cells simultaneously and studied their responses to thalamic and cortical stimulation. In the example of Fig. 5, two cells were recorded simultaneously at a similar depth, ~1.1 mm. Cell 1 was 2 mm anterior to cell 2 and therefore closer to the cortical stimulating electrode (see scheme in Fig. 1). Both cells responded to cortical and thalamic stimulation under different backgrounds of current injection, as indicated by the pulse protocols in Fig. 5. And both were corticothalamic cells because they were antidromically invaded from the LP nucleus with latencies of 0.6 ms for cell 1 and 0.5 ms for cell 2 (see insets at bottom). Antidromic invasion after thalamic stimulation was followed by an EPSP at 2.5 ms latency in cell 1, and 2.8 ms latency in cell 2 (Fig. 5, bottom panel, expanded detail indicated by arrow) that was crowned by action potentials and followed by a prominent IPSP in both cells. Cortical stimulation (top panels, Cx stim) triggered in both cells a longer lasting IPSP with a higher decrease in Rin, as compared with thalamic stimulation (bottom panels, Thal. stim). Noteworthy, cell 2 generated bursts of two to four action potentials at 230 Hz on depolarizing pulses applied at hyperpolarizing Vms (Fig. 5, Cx stim, cell 2, detail at right) and riding on a humplike potential, whereas smaller pulses elicited only passive responses.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| FIG. 5.
Simultaneously recorded neurons at similar depths may display dissimilar IPSPs. Cell 1 (left column) and cell 2 (right column) were 2 mm apart and were recorded simultaneously at a depth of 1.1 mm in area 5. Thalamic (bottom panel) and cortical (top panel) stimulation was applied on a background of different current injections (values are indicated). Both cells were antidromically activated from the thalamus and orthodromically from an adjacent focus in area 5 (expanded details indicated by arrow). Inhibitory responses in cell 1 had smaller amplitude and duration than in cell 2. Further details in text. In this and the following figures, small deflections that are concomitant with action potentials in the simultaneously recorded neuron are due to capacitive coupling.
|
|
To characterize the hyperpolarizing responses to cortical and thalamic stimulation shown in Fig. 5 and to compare the relative drop of Rin among the two cells, we constructed V-I plots (Fig. 6). Values of resting Vm were obtained from 10-30 ms before stimulation (+), the peak of the IPSP was taken at ~30 ms after the stimulation (
), and an additional value was taken at 150-200 ms after stimulation (
). Vm values were plotted against current, and Rin was read from the slope of regression lines fitted to the data. In cell 1, Rin decreased from 38 M
at rest to 11 M
(70% drop) at the peak of the cortically elicited IPSP, and recovered to 24 M
at 200 ms after stimulation. The same cortical stimulus led to a decrease in Rin in cell 2, from 19 to 2 M
(90% drop) at 30 ms, but the Rin was still only 12 M
at 200 ms. Thalamic stimulation led to a drop in Rin of cell 1 from 44.1 to 14 M
(68% drop) at the peak of the IPSP, and Rin was back to 37 M
at 150 ms. In cell 2, thalamic stimulation brought Rin from 22.8 down to 6 M
(71% drop) at the peak, but the Rin was still decreased (15 M
) at 200 ms.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| FIG. 6.
Voltage-current V-I plots from simultaneously recorded cells depicted in Fig. 5. Values of Vm were obtained from 10 to 30 ms before stimulation (+), 30 ms after stimulation, coincident with the peak of the IPSP ( ), and 150-200 ms after stimulation ( ). Vm values were plotted against DC current, and Rin was read from the slope of regression lines fitted to the data.
|
|
In summary, the results presented in Figs. 5 and 6 show that two cells recorded at the same depth, 2 mm apart in the anteroposterior axis of the suprasylvian cortex, had different amounts of inhibition associated with cortical or thalamic stimuli. Cell 2 was the target of more powerful inhibition to both stimuli than cell 1, as seen from the longer duration of the IPSP and the percentage drop in Rin during the peak of the IPSP. The Rin decrease was higher in cell 2 than in cell 1, both after cortical (90% compared with 70%) and thalamic (71% compared with 68%) stimulation.
Another example of two cells recorded simultaneously in deep cortical layers, but showing different amounts of inhibitory input, is illustrated in Fig. 7. Cell 1 was at 1.2 mm from the surface, whereas cell 2 was located at a depth of 1 mm. Cortical and thalamic stimulation were applied on a background of depolarizing and hyperpolarizing current injection. In cell 1, IPSPs were small and short lasting after cortical (4-mV amplitude and 26-ms duration) and thalamic (4.5-mV amplitude and 40-ms duration) stimulation. In response to the same stimuli, cell 2 showed IPSPs that were considerably larger, both after cortical (20 mV, 120 ms) and thalamic (17 mV, 90 ms) stimulation. Reversal was similar after cortical (
80 mV) and thalamic (
78 mV) stimulation.
Effect of stimulation intensity
Varying the intensity of stimulation revealed further differences in the local inhibitory circuit activated by cortical or thalamic volleys. By increasing the stimulation strength, the inhibitory input increased in all investigated cells (n = 12). Figure 8 depicts a pair of cells that were recorded simultaneously at depths of 1.2 mm (cell 1) and 1 mm (cell 2). Both cells had prominent and apparently similar IPSPs in response to cortical and thalamic stimulation. However, by changing the intensity of stimulation in a stepwise manner, some differences were revealed between the two cells (right column in Fig. 8 depicts expanded details). At the lowest intensity, cortical stimulation triggered a clear-cut biphasic IPSP in cell 1 (10 mV, total duration of 50 ms) but only a brief arrest of firing, without an apparent IPSP, in cell 2. Increasing the intensity of cortical stimulation revealed more steps in IPSP amplitude for cell 2 than for cell 1. In the case of thalamic stimulation, the smallest intensity did not evoke an IPSP but reduced firing frequency in both cells; thereafter, four steps of increased intensity revealed four different degrees of inhibition in cell 1, but a ceiling effect was observed in cell 2 after the second step.

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| FIG. 8.
Varying the intensity of stimulation reveals differences in IPSPs between 2 cells recorded simultaneously at 1.2 mm (cell 1) and 1 mm (cell 2). Cells responded to cortical (top panel, Cx stim.) and thalamic (bottom panel, Th. stim.) stimulation with progressively increasing amplitudes of IPSPs. However, some differences among these neurons are seen with stepwise changes in stimulation strength to either cortex or thalamus (see text; details of the evoked IPSPs are expanded on the right column).
|
|
Effect of intracellular Cl
infusion
The IPSPs recorded after both types of stimulation had complex shapes due to the activation of mono- and polysynaptic pathways. An attempt was made to dissociate the Cl
-dependent GABAA component from the K+-dependentGABAB component (n = 13), as described in vitro (Connors et al. 1988
).
Intracellular injection of Cl
reversed the evoked IPSPs and revealed additional differences between cortical and thalamic stimulation. The cell depicted in Fig. 9 was located at 1.2 mm depth and was recorded with a 3-M KCl-filled pipette. Cortical stimulation applied after several minutes of impalement gave rise to an antidromic spike at 0.6-ms latency (see inset) followed by a strong depolarizing response at 4-ms latency, which triggered burst firing with spike inactivation. Bursting was not intrinsic but due to synaptic input, as indicated by the one-to-one correspondence between spikes and the individual components of the input, revealed by the hyperpolarizing pulse (detail in top panel). The initial response to cortical stimulation was followed, 80 ms later, by a secondary and similarly strong depolarizing response that is normally hidden by the IPSP. Thalamic stimulation (Fig. 9, bottom panel) gave rise to a single depolarizing event at a latency of 2.5 ms. Hyperpolarization blocked the occurrence of the spike and increased the amplitude of the thalamically evoked depolarizing synaptic response. To sum up, cortical stimulation set into action polysynaptic chains, whereas thalamic stimulation seemed to activate more circumscribed cortical zones.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| FIG. 9.
Intracellular injection of Cl fully reversed the IPSPs. A cell was recorded at 1.2-mm depth, with a 3-M KCl-filled pipette. The cell was antidromically activated by cortical stimulation (Cx, top panel; see inset above) and orthodromically by thalamic stimulation (Th, bottom panel). No signs of IPSP remained after Cl leakage into the cell.
|
|
The state of inhibitory responses was monitored by simultaneously recording one cell with KCl-filled pipette and a reference cortical cell with a KAc-filled pipette (n = 7). In the example shown in Fig. 10, cell 1 was recorded at 1.3 mm depth with KAc and responded to thalamic stimulation, applied during depolarizing current pulses, with a robust EPSP-IPSP sequence. The EPSP had a latency of 3.5 ms, and the IPSP had an amplitude of 13 mV and a duration of 130 ms (measured at
60 mV) and was reversed by hyperpolarizing pulses at
70 mV. Rin was evaluated from the slope of V-I plots (not shown) and dropped from 18.5 M
at rest to 6 M
during the peak of the IPSP, and was 13 M
at 150 ms after the stimulus. Cell 2 was recorded simultaneously at a depth of 1.2 mm, with a KCl-filled pipette, and responded to the same thalamic stimuli, after several minutes of impalement, with an antidromic spike (0.5-ms latency, see detail in Fig. 10, bottom) followed by a high-amplitude and long-duration (70 ms) depolarizing potential (see detail in Fig. 10, top) that triggered burst firing. Thalamic stimulation applied during hyperpolarizing pulses failed to invade antidromically the cell and triggered a depolarizing synaptic response of increased amplitude.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| FIG. 10.
Dual intracellular recordings with KCl- and KAc-filled pipettes. Cell 1 was recorded with KAc pipette and showed a prominent IPSP in response to thalamic stimulation (see inset). Simultaneously recorded cell 2 showed no IPSP on the same stimuli after Cl leaked into the cell (see inset). Cell 2 was antidromically activated by thalamic stimulation, at 0.5-ms latency (detail in bottom panel).
|
|
Thalamically evoked IPSPs were progressively reversed by intracellular Cl
injections. This is shown for a cell located at a depth of 0.8 mm, recorded with a 1.5-M KCl-filled pipette (Fig. 11). The top and bottom panels in Fig. 11 show two depolarizing current pulse of different amplitudes (values are indicated), during which thalamic stimuli were delivered. Superimposed traces show the evoked IPSP immediately after impalement and ~15 min after impalement. Before the IPSP reversal by the leak of Cl
inside the cell, the IPSP had and amplitude of 4.2 mV (peak at 30 ms) and 130 ms in duration, measured from
60 mV. Its reversal was at
70 mV. The Rin of the cell was 26 M
, dropped to 12 M
at the peak of the IPSP, and was 16 M
at 120 ms. After several minutes of recording, hyperpolarizing IPSPs were no longer evoked, and stimulation triggered a burst of action potentials. The burst was followed by a pause, whose duration depended on the amount of current being applied (40 ms in top panel, with a pulse of +0.5 nA, and 160 ms in the bottom panel, with a +0.2-nA pulse). Thereafter the firing resumed due to the application of depolarizing current.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| FIG. 11.
Progressive reversal of thalamically evoked IPSPs with Cl . Cell recorded with a1.5-M KCl-filled pipette showed a progressive reversal of the IPSPs. Top and bottom panels show, for different background current levels (depolarizing pulses of +0.5 and +0.2 nA), superimposed responses to thalamic stimulation applied immediately after impalement and a few minutes after impalement.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The three major findings of this study are as follows. 1) Cortically as well as thalamically evoked IPSPs in neurons recorded from cortical association area 5 showed local differences in amplitude and duration that did not correspond to their localization in various layers. 2) IPSPs elicited by thalamic or cortical stimulation were almost completely reversed after intracellular injection of Cl
. 3) IB cells from all layers showed robust inhibitory responses, not different from those recorded in RS cells.
Some methodological issues
The rather short latency of thalamically evoked antidromic responses in cortical neurons reported in this study (0.3-0.6 ms) may be surprising because layer VI cells have a small size and, presumably, a slow conduction velocity. However, several data from the recent and older literature explain that such short latencies are compatible with the conduction velocities and morphological characteristics of corticothalamic axons. 1) Axons originating in cells of cat's suprasylvian area 5 (where our experiments have been conducted) give rise to collaterals distributing to the striatum as well as the LP thalamic nucleus; the latter are thick and end in clusters of large boutons within the LP nucleus (Paré and Smith 1996
). It is plausible that the thick corticothalamic axons described in this study conduct at high velocities and explain the short latencies found in our paper. 2) Another, nonexclusive possibility is that our stimulus spread to the centrum medianum (CM) nucleus that is located at no more than 1-1.5 mm medial to LP (or the stimulus activated cortico-CM passing axons). In a previous study, it was found that the cortical cells in areas 5 and 7, projecting to CM, have high conduction velocities, up to 33 m/s, much faster than in other corticothalamic systems (Steriade et al. 1978
).
The relatively long latency of orthodromic excitatory responses after thalamic stimulation, >1-1.5 ms in most instances, may be due to the hyperpolarization of thalamocortical (TC) cells during anesthesia. A depolarizing event triggered on a background of membrane hyperpolarization leads to a LTS and a spike burst instead of a single spike; the LTS has a rising time of a few milliseconds, which delays the firing of the TC cell after the stimulation (Deschênes et al. 1984
; Jahnsen and Llinás 1984
).
We cannot rule out the possibility that collaterals of corticothalamic axons were activated when stimulating the thalamus. However, this is unlikely to cause a major contamination because antidromic pyramidal stimulation has been shown to be much less effective in evoking inhibition than local synaptic activation (Krnjevi
et al. 1966
; Renaud et al. 1974
). Besides, this was not a major concern, because the objective of the present study was not to differentiate between corticocortical and thalamocortical pathways, but to determine whether there is a distinct laminar distribution of inhibitory inputs. Two differences were evident, however, between cortically and thalamically evoked IPSPs: 1) cortically elicited IPSPs were of higher amplitude, longer duration, and associated to larger increases in conductance than those evoked by thalamic stimulation; and 2) only thalamic stimulation was capable of eliciting IPSPs in isolation.
It is possible that synaptic potentials were contaminated by afterhyperpolarizations when stimulation led to firing of action potentials. Although most of the inhibition evoked by cortical or thalamic stimulation reversed with Cl
injections (see Figs. 10 and 11), it is likely that intrinsic currents may participate in shaping the synaptic responses. No attempt was made to dissociate the intrinsic components in the synaptic responses investigated here.
Absence of prevalent laminar distribution
In motor cortex in vitro (vanBrederode and Spain 1995
), strong inhibitory responses to local stimulation consisted of GABAA-B components, were present in layers 2 and 3, and were weak or absent in layer 5. This difference was attributed, at least in part, to the strong Ih in layer V neurons. In visual cortex in vivo (Douglas and Martin 1991
), both types of GABAergic responses were present in all layers, butGABAA IPSPs were more pronounced in deep layers, whereas IPSPs in superficial layers developed more slowly and lasted longer. These data led to the proposal of a "canonical" circuit for the visual cortex, despite the rich interconnectivity between layers (Gilbert and Wiesel 1979
; Kisvárday et al. 1987
; Martin and Whitteridge 1984
; Somogyi et al. 1983
). Our data suggest that the microcircuitry in the association cortex is more complicated and that the amount of inhibition associated to thalamic or cortical inputs is determined by the local microcircuitry in a manner that remained beyond the methods of exploration used here.
A concern when comparing inhibitory responses between cells at different depths relates to the homogeneity of the excitatory drive reaching the local inhibitory interneurons that impinge on different cells. In other words, are differences in IPSPs' amplitudes and durations artificially caused by differences in the excitatory drive to interneurons, due to the particular placement of stimulating electrodes? In this study, synaptic responses were evoked by strong, synchronous stimulation of the thalamus or the cortex. Such responses constitute an inseparable combination of EPSPs and IPSPs resulting from the activation of polysynaptic neuronal chains. In such conditions, evoked responses in any particular animal might be biased toward a certain laminar distribution of IPSPs, due to the placement of stimulating electrodes. However, no trend was seen in any particular experiment (see Fig. 2). In addition, to avoid this problem, we recorded pairs of cells simultaneously, at distances between 2 and5 mm.
Data from in vitro experiments have shown a lower threshold for excitation than for inhibition on cortical stimulation (Gil and Amitai 1996
). In our study IPSPs were never evoked alone on cortical stimulation, but they could be triggered in isolation after thalamic stimulation (see Figs. 1B and 3). This result may suggest a lower threshold for inhibition than for excitation in thalamocortical pathways, compared with corticocortical ones. However, at high-intensity stimulation, cortically elicited IPSPs were consistently of higher amplitude and longer duration and were accompanied by larger increments in membrane conductance (see dual intracellular recordings in Figs. 5 and 7). In those cases in which IPSPs were observed in isolation, the latency was longer than 3 ms, which is compatible with at least a bisynaptic pathway, therefore involving intermediary intracortical steps.
The IPSPs presented in this study were mostly monophasic, as has recently been found in vivo (Contreras et al. 1996
) and in vitro (Gil and Amitai 1996
). As well, the IPSPs were reversed almost completely by Cl
. This result is at variance with the expected biphasic (GABAA- andGABAB-mediated) IPSP that has been described in vitro (Connors et al. 1988
; vanBrederode and Spain 1995
). One possible explanation that has recently been advanced (Contreras et al. 1996
) is that the evoked GABAA IPSP shuts off cellular activity in a large proportion of cells, thus leading to a generalized phenomenon of disfacilitation during which K+ currents, responsible for the resting Vm, dominate the membrane behavior. It was then hypothesized that the apparent absence of GABAB components is due to the overwhelming effect of disfacilitation. Such a scenario may only be observable in a situation, such as in vivo, with important spontaneous activity. In the experiments presented here, under barbiturate anesthesia, background activity is smaller than under ketamine-xylazine, and the additional explanation may be offered that GABAB IPSPs are masked by the decreased Rin of a long-lasting GABAA IPSP. It has been shown in vitro (Thompson and Gäwhiler 1992) that pentobarbital sodium increases the decay time constant of GABAA-mediated currents, consequently prolonging GABAA-mediated IPSPs, as well as that long-lasting GABAA IPSPs may be due to polysynaptic activity. Long-lasting (0.1-0.4 s) monophasic IPSPs, with peak amplitudes at ~30 ms, have been described in vivo (Pollen and Lux 1966
; Renaud et al. 1974
); in those studies the percentage decrease in Rin at the peak of the IPSP varied considerably, from <50 to 100% (see also Krnjevi
et al. 1966
) (up to 60%). This variation, including our own results (60-90% according to the stimulated pathway), probably reflects the number and location of synapses activated, which in turn depends on the intensity and location of the stimulation. The time course and amplitude of the IPSPs presented in the present study is in full agreement with those earlier studies.
An important step in the evaluation of the excitatory-inhibitory balance in a given region of the cortex is to gain knowledge of underlying anatomic circuits. Given the remarkable heterogeneity of the laminar distribution of thalamocortical axons in different cortical areas (Jones 1985
), some basic questions are as follows. 1) Is there a laminar arrangement of inputs that predicts a laminar organization of excitatory and/or inhibitory responses? 2) What is the distribution of symmetric and asymmetric synapses over the membrane of cells located at different depths? And 3) do thalamic or cortical inputs contact preferentially a specific cell type? A classical description of laminar distribution of thalamic inputs (Lorente de Nó 1938
) separated a "specific" system with terminal arborizations densely packed in layers 3 and 4 and an "unspecific" system terminating sparsely in layers 1 and 6. Thalamic inputs to primary sensory areas, such as the visual cortex, show characteristic laminar differences in the distribution of EPSPs and IPSPs (Ferster and Lindström 1983
). The LP-pulvinar nuclear complex projects to layers 4 and 1 of area 5 in the cat (Robertson 1978
). Anatomic data indicate that there is a widely distributed layer 1 projecting system in the thalamus, interspersed among neurons projecting to deeper layers (Avendaño et al. 1990
; Steriade and Deschênes 1984
). Despite the diversity of inhibitory inputs to cortical cells, the large decreases in Rin associated with the IPSPs indicate that a large proportion of the inhibitory action occurs at or near the cell soma. Therefore neither anatomic nor the present physiological data indicate any preferential distribution of inhibitory inputs to distinct layers in the association cortex. In contrast to successful studies in primary cortices (mainly motor and visual), association areas defy more global approaches and require for its understanding combined physiological and anatomic studies at the single-cell level.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
This work was supported by grants from the Medical Research Council and Human Frontier Science Program. D. Contreras was a Ph.D. student supported by the Savoy Foundation. N. Dürmüller was a postdoctoral fellow.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Address for reprint requests: M. Steriade, Laboratoire de Neurophysiologie, Faculté de Medecine, Université Laval, Quebec G1K 7P4, Canada.
Received 23 May 1997; accepted in final form 21 July 1997.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
AVENDAÑO, C.,
RAUSELL, E.,
PEREZ-AGUILAR, D.,
ISORNA, S.
Organization of the association cortical afferent connections of area 5: a retrograde tracer study in the cat.
J. Comp. Neurol.
278: 1-33, 1988.[Medline]
-
AVENDAÑO, C.,
RAUSSEL, E.,
REINOSO-SUAREZ, F.
Thalamic projections to areas 5a and 5b of the parietal cortex in the cat: a retrograde horseradish peroxidase study.
J. Neurosci.
5: 1446-1470, 1985.[Abstract]
-
AVENDAÑO, C.,
STEPNIEWSKA, I.,
RAUSELL, E.,
REINOSO-SUAREZ, F.
Segregation and heterogeneity of thalamic cell populations projecting to superficial layers of posterior parietal cortex: a retrograde tracer study in cat and monkey.
Neuroscience
39: 547-559, 1990.[Medline]
-
CONNORS, B.
GABAA- and GABAB-mediated processes in visual cortex.
In: Progress in Brain Research. GABA in the Retina and Central Visual System.,
edited by
R. Mize,
R. Marc,
and A. Sillito
. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1992, vol. 90, p. 335-348
-
CONNORS, B. W.,
GUTNICK, M. J.,
PRINCE, D. A.
Electrophysiological properties of neocortical neurons in vitro.
J. Neurophysiol.
48: 1302-1320, 1982.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
CONNORS, B. W.,
MALENKA, R. C.,
SILVA, L. R.
Two inhibitory post-synaptic potentials, and GABAA and GABAB receptor-mediated responses in neocortex of rat and cat.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
406: 443-468, 1988.[Abstract]
-
CONTRERAS, D.,
STERIADE, M.
Cellular basis of EEG slow rhythms: a study of dynamic corticothalamic relationships.
J. Neurosci.
15: 604-622, 1995.[Abstract]
-
CONTRERAS, D.,
TIMOFEEV, I.,
STERIADE, M.
Mechanisms of long-lasting hyperpolarization underlying slow sleep oscillations in cat corticothalamic networks.
J. Physiol. Lond.
494: 251-264, 1996.[Abstract]
-
DEFELIPE, J.,
FARIÑAS, I.
The pyramidal neuron of the cerebral cortex: morphological and chemical characteristics of the synaptic inputs.
Prog. Neurobiol.
39: 563-607, 1992.[Medline]
-
DE LA PEÑA, E.,
GEIJO-BARRIENTOS, E.
Laminar localization, morphology, and physiological properties of pyramidal neurons that have the low-threshold calcium current in the guinea-pig medial frontal cortex.
J. Neurosci.
16: 5301-5311, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
DESCHÊNES, M.,
PARADIS, M.,
ROY, J. P.,
STERIADE, M.
Electrophysiology of neurons of lateral thalamic nuclei in the cat: resting properties and burst discharges.
J. Neurophysiol.
51: 1196-1219, 1984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
DOUGLAS, R.,
MARTIN, K. A
functional microcircuit for cat visual cortex.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
440: 735-769, 1991.[Abstract]
-
FERSTER, D.,
LINDSTRÖM, S.
An intracellular analysis of geniculo-cortical connectivity in area 17 of the cat.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
342: 181-215, 1983.[Abstract]
-
GIL, Z.,
AMITAI, Y.
Properties of convergent thalamocortical and intracortical synaptic potentials in single neurons of neocortex.
J. Neurosci.
16: 6567-6578, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
GILBERT, C.,
WIESEL, T.
Morphology and intracortical projections of functionally characterized neurons in the cat visual cortex.
Nature
280: 120-125, 1979.[Medline]
-
HASSLER, R.,
MUHS-CLEMENT, K.
Architektonischer Aufbau des sensorimotorischen und parietalen Cortex der Katze.
J. Hirnforsch.
6: 377-420, 1964.
-
HERKENHAM, M.
Laminar organization of thalamic projections to the rat neocortex.
Science
207: 532-535, 1980.[Medline]
-
HUBEL, D. H.,
WIESEL, T. N.
Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
148: 574-591, 1959.
-
JAHNSEN, H.,
LLINÁS, R.
Electrophysiological properties of guinea-pig thalamic neurones: an in vitro study.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
349: 205-226, 1984.[Abstract]
-
JONES, E. G.
In: The Thalamus.,
. New York: Plenum, 1985
-
KANG, Y.,
KANEKO, T.,
OHISHI, H.,
ENDO, K.,
ARAKI, T.
Spatiotemporally differential inhibition of pyramidal cells in the cat motor cortex.
J. Neurophysiol.
71: 280-293, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
KISVÁRDAY, Z.,
MARTIN, K.,
FRIEDLANDER, M.,
SOMOGYI, P.
Evidence for interlaminar inhibitory circuits in striate cortex of the cat.
J. Comp. Neurol.
260: 1-19, 1987.[Medline]
-
KRNJEVI
, K.,
RANDIC, M.,
STRAUGHAN, D.
Nature of a cortical inhibitory process.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
184: 49-77, 1966.[Medline] -
LORENTE DE NÓ, R.
Analysis of the activity of the chain of internuncial neurons.
J. Neurophysiol.
1: 207-244, 1938.[Free Full Text]
-
MARTIN, K.,
WHITTERIDGE, D.
Form, function and intracortical projections of spiny neurones in the striate visual cortex of the cat.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
353: 463-504, 1984.[Abstract]
-
MCCORMICK, D. A.,
CONNORS, B. W.,
LIGHTALL, J. W.,
PRINCE, D. A.
Comparative electrophysiology of pyramidal and sparsely spiny stellate neurons of the neocortex.
J. Neurophysiol.
54: 782-806, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
MCCORMICK, D. A.,
WANG, Z.,
HUGUENARD, J.
Neurotransmitter control of neocortical neuronal activity and excitability.
Cereb. Cortex
3: 387-398, 1993.[Abstract]
-
MOUNTCASTLE, V. B.
Modality and topographic properties of single neurons of cat's somatic cortex.
J. Neurophysiol.
20: 408-434, 1957.[Free Full Text]
-
NICOLL, R.,
MALENKA, R.,
KAUER, J.
Functional comparison of neurotransmitter receptor subtypes in mammalian central nervous system.
Physiol. Rev.
70: 513-565, 1990.[Free Full Text]
-
NUÑEZ, A.,
AMZICA, F.,
STERIADE, M.
Electrophysiology of cat association cortical cells in vivo: intrinsic properties and synaptic responses.
J. Neurophysiol.
70: 418-429, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
PARÉ, D.,
SMITH, Y.
Thalamic collaterals of corticostriatal axons: their termination field and synaptic targets in cats.
J. Comp. Neurol.
372: 551-567, 1996.[Medline]
-
POLLEN, D.,
LUX, H.
Conductance changes during inhibitory postsynaptic potentials in normal and strychninized cortical neurons.
J. Neurophysiol.
29: 367-381, 1966.
-
RENAUD, L.,
KELLY, J.,
PROVINI, L.
Synaptic inhibition in pyramidal tract neurons: membrane potential and conductance changes evoked by pyramidal tract and cortical surface stimulation.
J. Neurophysiol.
37: 1144-1155, 1974.[Free Full Text]
-
ROBERTSON, R.
Thalamic projections to areas 5 and 7 of parietal cortex in the cat.
Soc. Neurosci. Abstr.
4: 79, 1978.
-
SOMOGYI, P.,
KISVÁRDAY, Z.,
MARTIN, K.,
WHITTERIDGE, D.
Synaptic connections of morphologically identified and physiologically characterized large basket cells in the striate cortex of cat.
Neuroscience
10: 261-294, 1983.[Medline]
-
STERIADE, M.,
DESCHÊNES, M.
The thalamus as a neuronal oscillator.
Brain Res. Rev.
8: 1-63, 1984.
-
STERIADE, M.,
KITSIKIS, A.,
OAKSON, G.
Thalamic inputs and subcortical targets of cortical neurons in areas 5 and 7 of cat.
Exp. Neurol.
60: 420-442, 1978.[Medline]
-
STERIADE, M.,
NUÑEZ, A.,
AMZICA, F. A
novel slow (<1 Hz) oscillation of neocortical neurons in vivo: depolarizing and hyperpolarizing components.
J. Neurosci.
13: 3252-3265, 1993a.[Abstract]
-
STERIADE, M.,
NUÑEZ, A.,
AMZICA, F.
Intracellular analysis of relations between the slow (<1 Hz) neocortical oscillation and other sleep rhythms of the electroencephalogram.
J. Neurosci.
13: 3266-3283, 1993b.[Abstract]
-
THOMPSON, S.,
GÄHWILER, B.
Effects of the GABA uptake inhibitor Tiagabine on inhibitory synaptic potentials in rat hippocampal slice cultures.
J. Neurophysiol.
67: 1698-1701, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
VANBREDERODE, J.,
SPAIN, W.
Differences in inhibitory synaptic input between layer II-III and layer V neurons of the cat neocortex.
J. Neurophysiol.
74: 1149-1166, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]