Brain Research Institute, University of Zurich, CH-8029 Zurich, Switzerland
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Debanne, Dominique, Beat H. Gähwiler, and Scott M. Thompson. Bidirectional associative plasticity of unitary CA3-CA1 EPSPs in the rat hippocampus in vitro. J. Neurophysiol. 77: 2851-2855, 1997. Associative long-term potentiation (LTP) and depression of compound and unitary CA3-CA1 excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) were investigated in rat hippocampal slice cultures. The induction of LTP with synchronous pairing of synaptic activation and postsynaptic depolarization resulted in an increase in the amplitude of EPSPs to the same absolute level, regardless of whether the input was naive or had been previously depressed by asynchronous pairing of pre- and postsynaptic activity. Saturated LTP of compound and unitary EPSPs was reversed by asynchronous pairing and could be reinduced by synchronous pairing. The likelihood that an action potential in a presynaptic CA3 cell failed to trigger an unitary EPSP in a postsynaptic CA1 cell decreased after induction of associative potentiation and increased after induction of associative depotentiation. These changes in the rate of transmission failures were accompanied by large changes in the amplitude of nonfailure EPSPs. We conclude that the same CA3-CA1 synapses can alternatively undergo associative potentiation and depression, perhaps through opposite changes in a single expression mechanism.
Long-term potentiation (LTP) in the CA1 region can be reversed with stimulation protocols that induce homosynaptic long-term depression (LTD) (Barrionuevo et al. 1980 Hippocampal slice cultures were prepared and maintained as described previously (Gähwiler 1981 Potentiation of naive and depressed synapses to the same level
Potentiation was induced in area CA1 when extracellularly elicited EPSPs were repeatedly (60-100 times) paired with synchronous postsynaptic depolarizing pulses (240 ms, 0.5-2.5 nA). No further LTP could be induced by repeating the synchronous pairing (SP) procedure 15 min after such potentiation [amplitude after second SP = 95 ± 7% (mean ± SE) of the potentiated amplitude, n = 3 cells; not significantly different, P > 0.5; Fig. 1A]. We conclude that this procedure is sufficient to saturate the ability of synapses to express LTP, and we will assume that the procedure also results in saturated LTP of unitary EPSPs.
Reversal of potentiation by associative depression
If bidirectional plasticity can occur at a single synapse, then synapses at which saturating potentiation had previously been induced should be able to become depressed and then repotentiated (Dudek and Bear 1993
Bidirectional changes in synaptic reliability
LTP is associated with a decrease in the rate of synaptic failures (Malinow 1991
Previous studies of compound synaptic responses, elicited with extracellular stimulation, have suggested that homosynaptic potentiation and depotentiation can be alternatively induced with a single set of fibers (Dudek and Bear 1993
INTRODUCTION
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
; Dudek and Bear 1993
; Heynen et al. 1996
; Huerta and Lisman 1995
; Mulkey and Malenka 1992). It is not known, however, whether previously potentiated synapses can be depotentiated with stimulation patterns that induce associative LTD (Debanne et al. 1994
). This issue is particularly important because temporal contiguity of neuronal activity is likely to be an important determinant of the sign of the changes in synaptic efficacy (Debanne et al. 1994
; Huerta and Lisman 1995
). In addition, although it was previously inferred that depotentiation reflects a true decrease in the strength of previously potentiated synapses, there has been no evidence of bidirectional changes in the strength of unitary excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs), produced by an action potential in a single presynaptic neuron. Paired recordings from monosynaptically coupled cell pairs are particularly useful for addressing this question because stimulation of only a very small number of synapses is assured.
METHODS
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
). Hippocampi slices from 5- to 7-day-old rat pups were dissected at 400 µm and attached to glass coverslips in clotted chicken plasma. The coverslips were placed in individual sealed test tubes containing semisynthetic medium and maintained on a roller drum in an incubator for 2-4 wk. For electrophysiological recordings, cultures were transferred to a recording chamber mounted on an inverted microscope and continuously superfused with a warmed (32°C) saline containing (in mM): 149 Na+, 149 Cl
, 2.7 K+, 2.8 Ca2+, 2.0 Mg2+, 11.6 HCO
3, 0.4 H2PO
4, 5.6 glucose, and also 10 mg/l phenol red, at pH = 7.4. Pyramidal neurons were impaled by using sharp microelectrodes filled with 1 M potassium methylsulphate. EPSPs were recorded from postsynaptic CA1 cells. Compound EPSPs were evoked by field stimulation within area CA3; unitary EPSPs were evoked by generation of single presynaptic action potentials in intracellularly impaled CA3 pyramidal cells. The monosynaptic nature of unitary EPSPs was assessed as described previously (Debanne et al. 1995
).
). The Mann-Whitney U-test was used for all statistical comparisons.
RESULTS
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Bidirectional changes in compound excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) amplitude. A: induction of long-term potentiation (LTP) with repeated synchronous pairings (SP) of presynaptic activity and postsynaptic depolarization precludes further potentiation with the SP protocol and is thus saturating. B: induction of saturating LTP of naive synapses produces an increase in EPSP amplitude to 152 ± 11% of control (n = 14). At other naive synapses, long-term depression (LTD) was first induced with an asynchronous pairing (AP) protocol (see text). Subsequent induction of LTP with the SP protocol then produced an increase in EPSP amplitude to a level not different from that achieved by naive synapses after SP (156 ± 28% of naive amplitude, n = 6, P > 0.5). C: potentiation of a compound EPSP was 1st induced with the SP protocol, followed by induction of depotentiation with the AP protocol. Significant potentiation of the depotentiated EPSP could then be induced by repeating the SP. D: percent change in the amplitude of naive (n = 14), previously potentiated (n = 3), and previously depotentiated (n = 4) compound EPSPs produced by the SP protocol. Difference between previously potentiated and depotentiated EPSPs was statistically significant (P < 0.05).
). Assuming that the naive pathways were equivalent in the two sets of experiments, these results suggest that all synapses that were depressed by AP have been potentiated by SP.
). Indeed, significant potentiation of compound EPSPs could be induced when saturating potentiation had previously been reversed with the AP protocol (Fig. 1C). The increase in EPSP amplitude produced by the SP after prior depotentiation was significantly different from the effects of SPon EPSPs that had only been potentiated previously(Fig. 1D).
View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 2.
Bidirectional changes in unitary EPSP amplitude. Saturating potentiation of a CA3-CA1 unitary EPSP was 1st induced with SP (a + b). After stabilization of the potentiation, AP induced significant depotentiation (b + c). A final SP restored the potentiated level (c + d).
). Conversely, the failure rate is increased after induction of homosynaptic depression of naive synapses (Stevens and Wang 1994
). Because depotentiation affects previously potentiated synapses, opposite changes in the failure rate should occur after potentiation and depotentiation of unitary EPSPs.
). To confirm that the failure rate was not over estimated, failures were averaged. As shown in Fig. 3, A-C, the average of all sweeps designated as failures was clearly flat, indicating that small EPSPs were not incorrectly designated as failures.
View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 3.
Bidirectional changes in synaptic reliability. A, top left: associative LTP of a CA3-CA1 unitary EPSP induced by synchronous pairing and its subsequent depotentiation with asynchronous pairing. Top right: for each response to a presynaptic action potential, the trace was integrated, relative to a horizontal baseline cursor, for 2 intervals of 14 ms each, providing a measure of the noise and the EPSP. Bottom left: averaged EPSP in cell 2 before synchronous pairing, detected in response to 69% of action potentials in cell 1, and the average failure of transmission in 31% of the responses. Bottom right: distribution of noise integrals (upper graph) and responses designated as transmission failures (lower graph, black bars) were similar. EPSP area given as arbitrary units (=14 mV*ms). B: after induction of LTP with synchronous pairing, the failure rate decreased to 2% and the distribution of nonfailure EPSPs was shifted to the right (same cell as A). C: after induction of depotentiation with asynchronous pairing, the failure rate increased to 16% and the distribution of nonfailure EPSPs was shifted to the left (same cell as A). D: changes in the failure rate for 4 cell pairs after induction of potentiation and depotentiation. Some values were determined using data <10 min after the end of the pairing procedure.
DISCUSSION
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
; Heynen et al. 1996
; Mulkey and Malenka 1992). We report here similar observations for associative potentiation and depression of compound and unitary EPSPs, induced with synchronous and asynchronous pairing procedures, respectively.
). It may also be inferred from this observation that the AP protocol induced a true depression of naive synapses rather than a depotentiation of synapses that had become potentiated before the beginning of the recording. Second, after induction of saturating LTP and subsequent depotentiation with the AP protocol, both compound and unitary EPSPs could be potentiated by the SP procedure. Taken alone, the decrease in EPSP amplitude observed after AP in these experiments could result from depression of nonpotentiatable synapses or true depotentiation of potentiated synapses. Because the EPSP decrease could be reversed by a second SP, the participation of only nonpotentiatable synapses in the decrease in EPSP amplitude can be excluded.
). We now report that the failure rate of unitary connections decreases upon induction of associative LTP and increases upon induction of associative depotentiation. Because this observation was made with the use of paired recordings, these events represent true failures of the presynaptic action potential to trigger release, rather than failures of action potentials to propagate to the nerve terminal. Changes in the failure rate might be produced by either the alternative expression and suppression of clusters of AMPA receptors at postsynaptic sites (Liao et al. 1995
; Oliet et al. 1996
) or by opposite changes in the probability of presynaptic glutamate release (Bolshakov and Siegelbaum 1995
; Stevens and Wang 1994
). Although decreases in failure rates have been observed to occur in conjunction with LTP induction in many studies, it should be noted that we have also observed an accompanying increase in the amplitude of nonfailure EPSPs, unlike some previous studies in juvenile hippocampal slices (e.g., Bolshakov and Siegelbaum 1995
; Stevens and Wang 1994
), but consistent with observations in more mature tissue (Malinow 1991
).
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
---|
We thank L. Heeb, H. Kasper, L. Rietschin, and R. Schöb for excellent technical assistance and J.-C. Poncer and Dr. N. C. Guérineau for critically reading the manuscript.
This work was supported by the Fyssen and Dr. Eric Slack-Gyr Foundations and the Swiss National Science Foundation (31-42174.94).
![]() |
FOOTNOTES |
---|
Present address of D. Debanne: Unité de Neurocybernétique Cellulaire, UPR 9041, 280 Bld. Sainte Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France.
Address for reprint requests: S. M. Thompson, Brain Research Institute, August Forel-Strasse 1, CH-8029 Zurich, Switzerland.
Received 9 December 1996; accepted in final form 14 January 1997.
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|