Department of Zoology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Berkowitz, Ari.
Broadly Tuned Spinal Neurons for Each Form of Fictive Scratching
in Spinal Turtles.
J. Neurophysiol. 86: 1017-1025, 2001.
Behavioral choice can be mediated either
by a small number of sharply tuned neurons or by large populations of
broadly tuned neurons. This issue can be conveniently examined in the
turtle spinal cord, which generates each of three forms of
scratchingrostral, pocket, and caudal
in response to mechanical
stimulation in each of three adjacent regions of the body surface.
Previous research showed that many propriospinal neurons are broadly
tuned to either the rostral scratch region or the pocket scratch
region, but responses to caudal scratch stimulation could not be
examined in that reduced preparation. In the current study, individual
spinal neurons were recorded extracellularly from the gray matter of
the turtle spinal cord hindlimb enlargement, while sites in the
rostral, pocket, and caudal scratch regions were mechanically
stimulated. Many neurons were broadly tuned to the caudal scratch
region; other neurons were broadly tuned to either the pocket scratch
or rostral scratch region. All three types were typically found within
a single animal. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that the
turtle spinal cord relies on large populations of broadly tuned neurons
to select each of the three forms of scratching. In addition, neurons
that were broadly tuned to each of the scratch regions were typically
found in each spinal cord segment and within the same range of
mediolateral and dorsoventral locations. Providing that these neurons
are related to the selection and generation of the three forms of
scratching, this would indicate that cells of this type are not
segregated into distinct regions of the spinal cord gray matter.
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
How do nervous systems integrate
sensory information to generate an appropriate behavioral choice for
each circumstance? In some cases, sensory signals are funneled into a
single neuron or a small number of neurons that is dedicated to
producing a single type of behavior (Croll et al. 1985;
Edwards et al. 1999
; Frost and Katz 1996
;
Huang and Satterlie 1990
; Kovac and Davis 1980
; Newsome et al. 1989
; Salzman and
Newsome 1994
; Zottoli et al. 1999
). Each such
neuron is sharply tuned; that is, its receptive field is sufficiently
precise to select reliably a single, appropriate behavior on its own.
More commonly, however, a distributed population of broadly tuned
neurons integrates sensory information and selects an appropriate
behavior; the receptive field of each such neuron is insufficiently
precise to select reliably an appropriate behavior on its own, but the
neurons act as a population to encode a behavioral choice with the
required precision (Berkowitz and Stein 1994a
,b
; Bosco and Poppele 1993
; Bosco et al.
2000
; Georgopoulos et al. 1986
;
Heiligenberg 1987
; Kristan and Shaw 1997
;
Lee et al. 1988
; Levi and Camhi 2000
;
Lewis and Kristan 1998
; Liebenthal et al. 1994
; Lockery and Kristan 1990
; Miller et
al. 1991
; Ritzmann and Pollack 1988
;
Sparks et al. 1976
, 1997
; Westin
et al. 1988
). Most studies of population coding have focused on
behaviors that can vary continuously, just as the activity in an array
of sensory neurons can vary continuously. But can a population of
broadly tuned neurons also select among a set of discrete behavioral choices?
This issue can be conveniently addressed by examining the spinal cord
control of the three forms of scratching in turtles. Turtles respond to
mechanical stimulation of their shell or skin by rhythmically rubbing
their ipsilateral hindlimb against the stimulated site (Mortin
et al. 1985). Due to biomechanical constraints, the turtle
selects one of three forms of scratching
rostral, pocket, or
caudal
to rub against each of three adjacent (and slightly overlapping) regions of the body surface (Fig.
1). The three forms of scratching differ
in which part of the hindlimb contacts the body and in the timing of
knee extension within the hip movement cycle (Mortin et al.
1985
). Spinalized and immobilized turtles produce an
appropriate form of fictive scratching for each site stimulated; knee
extensor activity occurs in a distinct phase of the hip flexor activity
cycle in each form of fictive scratching (Fig. 1) (Robertson et al.
1985
); thus the spinal cord can perform the selection and
generation of an appropriate form of scratching even in the absence of
input from the brain and movement-related sensory feedback
(Robertson et al. 1985
).
|
Previous research demonstrated that there are populations of spinal
interneurons that are broadly tuned to either the rostral scratch
region or the pocket scratch region; sharply tuned neurons for either
of these regions are rare or absent (Berkowitz and Stein
1994a). This suggested that the turtle spinal cord may rely on
a distributed population of broadly tuned neurons to select each form
of scratching. These experiments, however, utilized a reduced spinal
cord preparation that did not include the spinal cord segments that
innervate the caudal scratch region, so it could not be determined
whether spinal neurons that respond to stimulation of the caudal
scratch region are broadly tuned or sharply tuned.
Interneurons involved in caudal scratching might be sharply tuned, even
though interneurons involved in rostral and pocket scratching are
generally broadly tuned, for the following reason. Sensory innervation
of the rostral scratch region is provided by the 3rd dorsal
(postcervical) through 6th dorsal
(D3-D6) spinal cord
segments; sensory innervation of the pocket scratch region is provided
by the D6-D8 segments
(Mortin and Stein 1990). These spinal segments are
adjacent and partly overlapping. In contrast, sensory innervation of
the caudal scratch region is provided by the 2nd sacral
(S2) and more posterior segments (Mortin
and Stein 1990
); these segments are separated from the
D3-D8 segments by three
intervening segments that provide sensory innervation to the hindlimb
instead. Thus spinal neurons that are activated by stimulation in the
caudal scratch region might not be activated during other forms of
scratching (i.e., might be sharply tuned), in contrast to neurons
activated by stimulation in the rostral scratch and pocket scratch
regions. Therefore one goal of the current study was to determine
whether or not there is a population of spinal neurons that are broadly
tuned to the caudal scratch region.
Previous work also examined the anatomical organization of spinal
interneurons that are activated by stimulation of the rostral scratch
or pocket scratch regions (Berkowitz and Stein 1994a). Recordings were made from the spinal white matter; the recorded axons
did not appear to be arranged according to the region of the body
surface to which they responded maximally. Nonetheless, the cell bodies
of such neurons might be segregated within the gray matter. Thus a
second goal of the current study was to determine whether the cell
bodies of spinal neurons are arranged in the gray matter according to
their sensory tuning.
These experiments have been reported previously in an abstract
(Berkowitz 1999).
![]() |
METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Surgical procedures
Adult red-eared turtles (Trachemys scripta elegans;
n = 16) of both sexes, weighing 500-1,500 g, were
immersed in crushed ice for at least 2 h prior to surgery to
induce hypothermic analgesia (Melby and Altman 1974).
Each animal was kept partially submerged in crushed ice throughout
surgery. The first surgical procedure on each animal was a dorsal
laminectomy to expose the spinal cord just posterior to the forelimb
enlargement; the spinal cord was then completely transected midway
between the dorsal roots of the D2 and
D3 spinal segments (Fig. 1). The exposed spinal
cord was then covered with Gelfoam surgical sponge (Upjohn, Kalamazoo, MI) moistened with turtle saline (Stein and Schild 1989
)
and the opening sealed with warm dental wax glued to the shell with
cyanoacrylate adhesive.
All remaining surgical procedures were carried out on regions of the
body posterior to this complete spinal transection. A second dorsal
laminectomy was performed to expose the spinal cord from the
D6 through the D10,
S1, or S2 spinal cord
segments (Fig. 1). The meninges were torn over the dorsal surface of
the spinal cord in just the region from which single spinal neurons
were to be recorded in that animal. The spinal cord was then covered with saline-moistened Gelfoam. Finally, several hindlimb muscle nerves
were dissected free from surrounding tissue through one or two
additional exposures; each nerve was then tied with surgical suture
near its entrance to the muscle and cut just distal to the tie, to
prepare it for electroneurographic recordings (ENGs). The nerves
prepared for ENGs were as follows: the hip flexor muscle nerve, VP-HP
(innervating puboischiofemoralis internus, pars anteroventralis), on
both sides of the body (or, in early experiments, on the right side
alone), and three knee extensor muscle nerves, IT-KE, AM-KE, and FT-KE
(innervating triceps femoris, pars iliotibialis, pars ambiens, and pars
femorotibialis, respectively) on the right side (Robertson et
al. 1985). FT-KE is the monoarticular knee extensor and
provides a clear indication of the timing of knee extension (Fig. 1)
(Robertson et al. 1985
).
Recordings
The turtle was allowed to warm up to room temperature and was injected intramuscularly with 8-10 mg/kg of the neuromuscular blocker gallamine triethiodide (Flaxedil, Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Canada, Montreal, Canada); in some experiments, a combination of gallamine triethiodide (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and D-tubocurarine (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was used instead. Warm dental wax was formed into water-tight wells surrounding each of the hindlimb nerve exposures and a third surrounding the posterior spinal cord exposure; these wax wells were glued to the shell with cyanoacrylate adhesive. The nerve wells were filled with mineral oil and the spinal cord well with turtle saline. The animal was intubated and maintained on an artificial respirator (Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA) for the remainder of the experiment. Dental wax was used to secure the immobilized animal's shell to a Plexiglas dish; the dish was bolted to a vibration isolation table (Newport Corporation, Irvine, CA).
ENGs were obtained via pairs of 100-µm silver wire, insulated except
for 2-4 mm at the tip, immersed in the pool of mineral oil
(Robertson et al. 1985). Single-unit recordings from
spinal neurons were obtained via Woods metal-filled glass
microelectrodes whose tips were plated with gold and then platinum
(Frank and Becker 1964
). The microelectrode was lowered
into the right side of the hindlimb enlargement spinal cord using a
piezoelectric microdrive (Burleigh Instruments, Fishers, NY). The
segmental location (D8, D9,
D10, S1, or
S2) and the mediolateral location (visually
estimated as a percentage of the distance from the midline to
Lissauer's tract, which are both visible on the dorsal surface of the
spinal cord) of each microelectrode penetration were noted; the
microelectrode depth was obtained from the digital readout of the
microdrive, which was set to zero when the microelectrode first touched
the surface of the spinal cord. Recordings were typically made in a
single segment in each animal, at the rostrocaudal level of the dorsal
roots; D8 recordings were made in more animals than other segments for surgical reasons. Recordings were always made
at depths of <1,200 µm and were made at depths of <900 µm for
electrode penetrations of >60% laterality to avoid recording from
motoneuron cell bodies. All isolated single units encountered were
studied if they were activated during fictive scratching; stimulation
in the caudal scratch region was usually used as a search stimulus.
ENGs and single-unit recordings were amplified and filtered (100-1,000
Hz band-pass; A-M Systems, Carlsborg, WA). ENGs, single-unit
recordings, and the force transducer output were digitized by pulse
code modulation (DC-5 kHz band-pass) via an eight-channel Neurocorder
video adapter (Cygnus Technology, Delaware Water Gap, PA) and stored on
videotapes, along with a voice channel.
Stimulation
Mechanical stimulation (gentle rubbing at 2-4 Hz with approximately constant force for all sites stimulated, generally 0.8-1.2 N) was delivered via a glass probe with a fire-polished tip, attached to a force transducer (Grass-Telefactor, West Warwick, RI). Stimulation was delivered for 20-50 s to a single site to elicit several consecutive cycles of fictive scratching; 2-min breaks were provided between stimulations. Whenever possible, nine sites were stimulated on each side of the body, comprising an approximately posterior-anterior axis through the caudal scratch, pocket scratch, and rostral scratch regions (Fig. 1); consecutive stimulation sites were alternated among the three scratch regions.
Analysis
Each single-unit recording, along with the hip flexor ENG ipsilateral to the stimulation site, was redigitized (at 12.5 and 2.5 kHz, respectively) from videotape to a computer, using Datapac 2000 hardware and software (Run Technologies, Laguna Hills, CA); in some cases, additional ENGs were also redigitized (at 2.5 kHz/channel). For each single-unit recording, every available episode of mechanically elicited fictive scratching was redigitized and analyzed (a total of over 1,100 episodes of fictive scratching). Each hip flexor ENG was full-wave rectified and smoothed (with a 10-ms time constant); the onset and offset of each hip flexor burst was determined via user-defined positive and negative slope crossings, respectively, using Datapac 2000. When necessary, single-unit action potentials were isolated using a spike-sorting module of Datapac 2000, on the basis of clustering of waveform parameters. Each cycle of fictive scratching was defined to begin and end with the onset and offset, respectively, of a burst of the hip flexor nerve ipsilateral to the stimulation site. The single-unit firing frequency was calculated on a cycle-by-cycle basis as the total number of single-unit action potentials during the scratch cycle, divided by the cycle duration. For each stimulation episode, all cycles of fictive scratching conforming to a set of standard criteria were analyzed. These criteria were as follows: 1) each cycle had to have a single clear hip flexor burst followed by a single clear hip flexor quiescent period, 2) each cycle had to begin and end during the period of stimulation, 3) the first cycle was always omitted, and 4) any cycles that began more than 20 s after the beginning of the first acceptable cycle were omitted. The mean single-unit firing rate for each site was calculated as the average of the cyclical single-unit rates over all acceptable scratch cycles from one or more episodes of stimulation at that site. For some figures, instantaneous single-unit firing frequency is displayed; it was calculated as the reciprocal of the interspike interval.
Spinal units were classified as sharply tuned if they were activated by
mechanical stimulation within the receptive field of only one form of
fictive scratching. Units were classified as broadly tuned if they were
activated by stimulation within the receptive fields of more than one
form of fictive scratching and showed clear tuning; that is, they were
most strongly activated by stimulation of one site and progressively
less strongly activated by stimulation of progressively more distant
sites. Broadly tuned units were further classified according to whether
they were most strongly activated by stimulation within the ipsilateral
caudal scratch, pocket scratch, or rostral scratch region; units that were activated approximately equally strongly by stimulation in two of
the three ipsilateral regions or responded maximally to stimulation in
the transition zone between two forms of ipsilateral fictive scratching
(Mortin et al. 1985) were classified accordingly as
caudal/pocket, pocket/rostral, or caudal/rostral. Units were classified
as "contralateral only" if they were only activated consistently by
stimulation in the contralateral scratch regions. The depth and
laterality (see above) of the electrode tip during the recording of
each tuned unit was plotted. Units were classified as untuned if they
were activated by stimulation within all of the ipsilateral scratch
receptive fields but showed no consistent change in firing rate as a
function of stimulation location along the posterior-anterior axis of
the body surface. Units were only included in this analysis if they
were studied during stimulation of at least four ipsilateral sites
including one site in each of the three scratch regions (before being lost).
Histology
In some experiments, electrolytic lesions were made by passing
current from a Hyfrecator (Birtcher, El Monte, CA) through the
recording electrode; sufficient current caused the gold/platinum electrode tip to detach and remain in place in the tissue. Animals were
then given an overdose of pentobarbital sodium (1.0 ml of 390 mg/ml solution ip) and transcardially perfused 1-2 h later with 600 ml
turtle saline (Stein and Schild 1989), including 0.1% sodium nitrite and 10,000 units/l heparin, followed by 200 ml fixative
[4% paraformaldehyde, 1.25% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer
(PB), pH 7.4]. The spinal cord was postfixed overnight, transferred to
20% sucrose in PB for 4-8 h, and transferred to embedding medium
(0.25% gelatin, 20% powdered egg albumin, 10% sucrose, in PB)
overnight. The embedding medium was hardened by addition of
glutaraldehyde to 2.5% and frozen-sectioned transversely at 60 µm on
a sliding microtome. Sections were dipped in Albrecht's solution
(0.75% gelatin in 40% ethanol) and mounted on gelatin-coated slides,
then dried, fixed, lightly counterstained with cresyl violet,
dehydrated, cleared, and coverslipped. Sections containing electrode
tips were traced using a drawing tube on a Nikon Optiphot-2 microscope
and scanned for illustration.
These procedures meet guidelines of the American Physiological Society and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The vast majority (48/56, or 86%) of the spinal units studied were broadly tuned. These neurons were activated by stimulation within the receptive fields for more than one form of scratching, but were maximally activated by stimulation within one region (or within 2 separate regions, in 2 cases) and were progressively less strongly activated by stimulation at sites progressively further away from this region, along an approximately posterior-anterior axis (Figs. 2 and 3). Of these broadly tuned neurons, 17 (35%) were tuned to an ipsilateral caudal scratch region (Figs. 2 and 3, A and B), 7 (15%) were tuned to a caudal/pocket region (i.e., maximally activated within both the caudal and the pocket region or in the transition zone between these regions; Fig. 3C, 4 and 5), 8 (17%) were tuned to a pocket region (Fig. 3C, 6), 3 (6%) were tuned to a pocket/rostral region (Fig. 3D, 7 and 8), and 10 (21%) were tuned to a rostral region (Fig. 3D, 9); in addition, 2 (4%) of the broadly tuned neurons were bimodally tuned to a caudal region and a rostral region (Fig. 4A), and 1 (2%) was activated only by stimulation of contralateral scratch regions.
|
|
|
Whenever several broadly tuned neurons were recorded from the same animal, they were tuned to quite different regions of the body surface. Figure 3 displays the tuning curves for nine broadly tuned neurons recorded from a single spinal segment of a single animal (the tuning curves are color-coded and arranged according to each neuron's tuning). Three of these neurons were caudal-tuned (Fig. 3, A and B, curves 1-3), two were caudal/pocket-tuned (Fig. 3C, 4 and 5), one was pocket-tuned (Fig. 3C, 6), two were pocket/rostral-tuned (Fig. 3D, 7 and 8), and one was rostral-tuned (Fig. 3D, 9).
Six (11%) of the spinal neurons studied were untuned (see METHODS). Only two neurons (4%) were sharply tuned; both of these neurons were tuned to a caudal scratch region (Fig. 4B).
The spinal segment, depth, and laterality (i.e., percentage of the distance from the midline to Lissauer's tract) of each recording location were noted (see METHODS). In each animal, units were typically recorded in the middle of one spinal segment, at the level of the dorsal roots, so there would be no ambiguity about the segment of the recording. To compare the electrode depth measurements and laterality estimates to the results of histological localization, three electrolytic lesions were made at predetermined depths and lateralities in the D9 segment of one additional animal (Fig. 5). Figure 5 suggests that the method of localizing the depth and laterality of recording sites was sufficiently precise to provide meaningful information on these locations, especially regarding depth.
|
The recording locations for all the broadly tuned and sharply tuned
neurons are plotted in Figs.
6 and
7, with color-coded symbols that
indicate the region of the body surface to which each neuron was tuned.
The electrode depth and laterality of each recording is plotted; these
plots are superimposed on schematic spinal cord cross sections to
provide approximate orientation. The vast majority, if not all, of the
neurons recorded are likely to be interneurons, rather than
motoneurons, because recordings were made only at depths of <1,200
µm and neurons were only recorded at depths >900 µm if the
electrode penetration was at 60% laterality; turtle motoneuron cell
bodies are generally located further ventrolaterally (Berkowitz
and Stein 1994c
and unpublished observations). The set of
neurons recorded from each of the five spinal cord segments of the
hindlimb enlargement included neurons tuned to a wide variety of
regions of the body surface (Fig. 6). For example, both caudal-tuned and rostral-tuned neurons were found in every spinal segment, except
D10 (from which only 3 tuned neurons were
recorded). Caudal-tuned neurons were common in the
D8 and D9 segments (the
most anterior segments of the hindlimb enlargement) despite the fact
that the caudal scratch region is innervated by the
S2 and more posterior spinal cord segments
(Mortin and Stein 1990
), which are at least three
segments away.
|
|
Figure 7A shows the depth and laterality of all single-unit recordings from tuned neurons, regardless of spinal segment, on a single plot. There appears to be no relationship between either the laterality or the depth of the recording and the region of the body surface to which the neuron was tuned. This is especially evident if one examines the average depth and laterality for all neurons tuned to a particular region (Fig. 7B); these averages overlap extensively and show no clear arrangement according to region of tuning. Electrode penetrations that were <30% lateral or more than 75% lateral recorded only very small action potentials, presumably from axons; these small spikes were not easily discriminated, and such units were not studied.
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The central finding of this study is that many spinal neurons are
broadly tuned to the caudal scratch region of the turtle's body
surface; other spinal neurons are broadly tuned to the pocket scratch
or the rostral scratch region instead. Spinal neurons tuned to each
region are found in each animal. This finding extends previous research
showing that many descending, propriospinal neurons are broadly tuned
to either the pocket scratch or the rostral scratch region; these
previous experiments were performed using a more reduced spinal cord
preparation that did not include the spinal segments that provide
sensory innervation to the caudal scratch region (Berkowitz
and Stein 1994a). One cannot be certain, of course, that any
one of the neurons recorded actively contributes to selection or
generation of scratching motor patterns. The large proportion of spinal
neurons that are broadly tuned to a scratch region, however, makes it
likely that at least some of these broadly tuned neurons do contribute
to selection and generation of scratch motor patterns. The current
findings add support to the hypothesis that the turtle spinal cord
selects an appropriate form of scratching for each stimulated site via
the activity of large populations of broadly tuned neurons rather than
via the activity of a small number of sharply tuned neurons
(Berkowitz and Stein 1994a
,b
). This suggests that
populations of broadly tuned neurons can mediate selection among
several discrete behavioral choices, just as they have been shown to
mediate the selection of continuously varying behaviors in other
systems (Georgopoulos et al. 1986
; Heiligenberg 1987
; Kristan and Shaw 1997
; Lee et al.
1988
; Levi and Camhi 2000
; Lewis and
Kristan 1998
; Liebenthal et al. 1994
;
Lockery and Kristan 1990
; Miller et al.
1991
; Ritzmann and Pollack 1988
; Sparks
et al. 1976
, 1997
; Westin et al.
1988
). This same set of neurons may also mediate generation of
the appropriate scratch synergy for each form of scratching
(Berkowitz 2001
).
Two of the 56 spinal neurons studied were sharply tuned; both of these
were tuned to the caudal scratch region. Thus it is conceivable that
the spinal cord relies on a small number of sharply tuned spinal
neurons to select caudal scratching and that broadly tuned neurons are
not necessary for caudal scratch selection. This seems unlikely,
however, given that the vast majority of recorded spinal neurons
activated by stimulation in the caudal scratch region were broadly
tuned. It is intriguing, however, that the only neurons found to be
sharply tuned to a scratch receptive field were both tuned to the
caudal scratch region; this may relate to the fact that the spinal
segments innervating the caudal scratch region are separated from the
spinal segments innervating the rostral and pocket scratch regions by
intervening spinal segments innervating the hindlimb (see
INTRODUCTION) (Mortin and Stein 1990). Given
this anatomical constraint, it is remarkable that so many of the
neurons recorded were activated to some degree by stimulation in both
the caudal scratch region and the pocket scratch and/or rostral scratch
regions. These broadly tuned spinal neurons must receive convergent
input over long distances (directly or indirectly) from a large number
of primary afferents, which themselves have very small receptive fields
(Currie and Stein 1990
). It is known that both turtle
primary afferents (Kunzle and Woodson 1983
) and turtle
descending propriospinal neurons (Berkowitz and Stein
1994c
) often have axons that project through several spinal
cord segments.
A second finding of this study is that the spinal neurons activated during caudal, pocket, or rostral fictive scratching do not appear to be segregated according to the region of the body surface to which they are tuned; that is, the recorded cells do not appear to be somatopically arranged within the spinal gray matter. It is possible that some of these gray matter recordings were from dendrites or axons, rather than cell bodies. These electrodes recorded only very small spikes from the putative white matter, however, suggesting that the larger spikes of the units studied are unlikely to be from axons.
The companion paper (Berkowitz 2001) shows that the
rhythmicity of this same set of units is clearly correlated with
electrode depth; this suggests that the lack of organization of neurons according to region of maximal response is a reflection of the actual
layout of the spinal cord, rather than a reflection of insufficient
precision in the localization methods employed. This finding adds to
previous research that showed that the descending axons of
propriospinal neurons activated during pocket and rostral fictive
scratching do not appear to be somatopically arranged within the spinal
white matter (Berkowitz and Stein 1994a
). If such
neurons indeed contribute to selection of a form of scratching, these
two studies together suggest that the spinal cord interneuronal circuitry used to select and generate distinct behaviors may be located
in overlapping or identical spinal cord regions, rather than being
segregated into a separate spinal cord region for each behavior or for
each region of the body surface. The distribution of spinal neurons
activated during turtle fictive scratching in this study is also
consistent with the distributions of spinal neurons activated during
cat fictive scratching in previous studies (Barajon et al.
1992
; Berkinblit et al. 1978
).
The finding that neurons tuned to different scratch receptive fields
may not be segregated in distinct zones of the spinal gray matter
appears to conflict with findings that activation of any one of a small
number of anatomical zones in the frog spinal cord generates a
convergent force field that would move the ipsilateral hindlimb to a
particular location in the workspace (Bizzi et al. 1995;
Saltiel et al. 1998
). In addition to the species
difference, however, there are a number of differences in methods that
might account for this apparent conflict. The frog experiments used electrical (Bizzi et al. 1995
) or chemical
(Saltiel et al. 1998
) stimulation of a spinal cord
region to generate types of movement that may or may not normally
occur; the current experiments used adequate stimulation in the scratch
receptive fields to generate fictive scratching. It is not clear how
the population of neurons activated by electrical or chemical
stimulation of a region relates to the population of neurons activated
when the animal moves its limb in a particular direction during a
natural behavior.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
The author thanks H. Sabapathy for technical assistance, Dr. Joseph Bastian for many useful discussions, and Drs. Joseph Bastian, Gammon M. Earhart, Paul S. G. Stein, and two anonymous referees for comments on a previous version of the manuscript.
This research was supported by National Science Foundation Award 9807991.
![]() |
FOOTNOTES |
---|
Author E-mail: ari{at}ou.edu.
Received 15 August 2000; accepted in final form 2 April 2001.
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|