Department of Pharmacology, James H. Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee 37614-0577
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Cheng, Hong and Michael D. Miyamoto. Effect of hypertonicity on augmentation and potentiation and on corresponding quantal parameters of transmitter release. Augmentation and (posttetanic) potentiation are two of the four components comprising the enhanced release of transmitter following repetitive nerve stimulation. To examine the quantal basis of these components under isotonic and hypertonic conditions, we recorded miniature endplate potentials (MEPPs) from isolated frog (Rana pipiens) cutaneous pectoris muscles, before and after repetitive nerve stimulation (40 s at 80 Hz). Continuous recordings were made in low Ca2+ high Mg2+ isotonic Ringer solution, in Ringer that was made hypertonic with 100 mM sucrose, and in wash solution. Estimates were obtained of m (no. of quanta released), n (no. of functional release sites), p (mean probability of release), and vars p (spatial variance in p), using a method that employed MEPP counts. Hypertonicity abolished augmentation without affecting potentiation. There were prolonged poststimulation increases in m, n, and p and a marked but transient increase in vars p in the hypertonic solution. All effects were completely reversed with wash. The time constants of decay for potentiation and for vars p were virtually identical. The results are consistent with the notion that augmentation is caused by Ca2+ influx through voltage-gated calcium channels and that potentiation is due to Na+-induced Ca2+ release from mitochondria. The results also demonstrate the utility of this approach for analyzing the dynamics of quantal transmitter release.
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Repetitive stimulation of motor nerves causes an
increase in the amount of transmitter released in the poststimulation
period. This can be measured as an increase in the endplate potential (EPP) amplitude or in the frequency of miniature endplate potentials (MEPPs) (Hubbard 1963). The increase can be separated
into four components: fast facilitation, slow facilitation,
augmentation, and potentiation (Magleby 1987
). Even
though there have been many studies of these components, the specific
events responsible for these phenomena remain unestablished.
Another well-investigated but enigmatic phenomenon is the effect of
hypertonic solutions on transmitter release. Moderate hypertonicity
causes an increase in MEPP frequency and nerve-evoked EPPs, but very
strong hypertonic solutions produce a decrease in nerve-evoked quantal
output (Hubbard et al. 1968). The effects are transient
in the mammal but more sustained in the frog (Kita and van der
Kloot 1977
). The study of transmitter release under hypertonic
conditions is important, because it may elucidate some of the processes
involved in exocytosis.
We have recently developed a method of estimating quantal release parameters during the brief periods associated with augmentation and potentiation. The aim of this study was to use this method to examine the effect of hypertonicity on these components and on the corresponding quantal release parameters.
![]() |
METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
We employed isolated cutaneous pectoris muscles from Rana pipiens in these experiments. Animals were killed by decapitation followed by rapid double pithing. Muscles with attached nerves were dissected free, mounted in a 1-ml Sylgard-lined chamber, and perfused with Ringer solution using a roller pump (1.5 ml/min). The normal Ringer solution was modified by decreasing Ca2+ and adding Mg2+ to prevent muscle contraction. The resulting solution contained (in mM) 110 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 0.3 CaCl2, 6.0 MgCl2, 5.6 glucose, and 2.0 tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris), pH 7.2 (226 mOsm). Hypertonic Ringer solution was made by adding 100 mM sucrose to the above solution (320 mOsm).
Intracellular 3M KCl-filled microelectrodes were used to record MEPPs before and after tetanic stimulation. Nerves were stimulated (40 s at 80 Hz with supramaximal 0.10-ms pulses) using a suction electrode and Grass S-88 stimulator. Each trial consisted of continuous single cell recording in which data were recorded after 20 min each in control Ringer, hypertonic Ringer, and wash. All experiments were carried out at room temperature (22-24°C). Data were recorded with a modified video recorder and results were analyzed off-line using an R. C. Electronics Data Acquisition System.
Augmentation and potentiation were defined as the fractional increase
in poststimulation over prestimulation transmitter release, when the
other component equaled zero. This was calculated by Vm = (Vt/Vc)1, where Vm was the
fractional increase in MEPP frequency at time t,
Vt was MEPP frequency at time t, and
Vc was control or prestimulation MEPP frequency.
Potentiation was determined empirically, from semilogarithmic plots of
Vm versus time, as the component with the slowest time
constant. Augmentation was determined as the component with the next
slowest time constant (Magleby 1987
).
To determine the quantal release parameters MEPPs were recorded
for 70 s after stimulation. The numbers of MEPPs in 10-ms intervals were counted and 300 sequential counts were used for each
estimate. The "moving bin" technique of Lev-tov and
Rahamimoff (1980) (bin size = 3 s,
bin = 1 s) was incorporated into the computer analysis (Provan
and Miyamoto 1993
) to smooth out point fluctuations. Because
the midpoint of the first bin occurred 1.5 s after stimulation,
examination of the two components of facilitation (decay constants < 1 s) was not feasible with this approach.
According to Brown et al. (1976), quantal analysis must take into
account spatial variance in p and temporal variance in
n and p. This problem was addressed by using very
short time bins (10 ms) to essentially eliminate temporal variance and
by using third moment equations to derive independent estimates of
spatial variance in p (vars p)
(Provan and Miyamoto 1993
).
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The effect of hypertonicity on augmentation and potentiation
is shown in Fig. 1, A and
B. In both panels MEPP frequencies are expressed as
Vm, the fractional increase over control (see METHODS), and plotted as a function of time after
stimulation. In Fig. 1A, the open circles show the expected
two-phase decay in MEPP frequency after stimulation. Exposure to
hypertonic solution () caused a shift to a one-phase decay, i.e.,
the first phase was abolished, whereas the second phase was unaffected.
Finally, washing with control solution (
) restored the two-phase
decay.
|
In Fig. 1B, the results are replotted on
semilogarithmic axes, so that the exponential components can be
expressed as straight lines. For the time between 20 and 70 s, the
data obtained in control, hypertonic, and wash solutions were clustered
around a line representing a single exponential component. This slower component (shown as P) presumably represented potentiation, and the
deviation from this line presumably reflected augmentation (Magleby 1987). The time constant of decay for
P was 23.7 s, whereas that for augmentation was
4.3 s (after correction for P). As
indicated by the points between 0 and 20 s, exposure to hypertonic solution eliminated augmentation without
affecting potentiation.
|
The effects of hypertonicity on the quantal release parameters are
shown in Fig. 2. The data are from the same experiments used to produce
Fig. 1, A and B. Because m is defined
as the number of MEPPs in a prescribed interval (Provan and
Miyamoto 1993), the results in Fig. 2A are identical
to those in Fig. 1A except they have not been normalized to
fractional release over control.
Figure 2 shows that hypertonicity caused a significant increase in each of the quantal release parameters. The initial poststimulation increase in m was fivefold greater in hypertonic than in control solution (Fig. 2A). This was associated with a 2-fold increase in n (Fig. 2B) and a 2.5-fold increase in p (Fig. 2C). The increases in m, n, and p in hypertonic solution were well sustained for the duration of the recording period; i.e., in terms of percent of initial value, m was still at 37% after 70 s (vs. 7% for isotonic control), n was at 58% (vs. 7% for control), and p was at 63% (vs. 24% for control). For both n and p, the time course of decay in hypertonic solution could be fitted by a one-component exponential.
There was also a marked increase in vars p (Fig.
2D), but the time course of decay was more rapid than with
m, n, or p. After 30 s,
vars p had decreased to 23% of the initial
value and was at baseline within 60 s. Regression fit of the
points in hypertonic solution (Fig. 2D, ) to a
one-component exponential yielded a decay time constant of 24.0 s.
The effects of hypertonicity were again completely reversible, as the
values obtained after 20 min of wash were indistinguishable from their
respective controls (Fig. 2, A-D).
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Because of the large number of trials needed with single junction
recording, a handful of investigators have used surface-recorded EPPs
to delineate the time course of decay of facilitation, augmentation, and potentiation (reviewed by Magleby 1987). Our results
show three advantages with the alternative use of MEPP frequency:
(1) the complete time course can be obtained with one run,
(2) correction for postsynaptic factors is not required, and
(3) estimates of quantal release parameters may be obtained.
The finding (Fig. 1B) that moderate hypertonicity abolished
augmentation but not potentiation supports the idea that these phenomena are associated with different processes (Magleby
1987). The results shown in Fig. 2 show that hypertonicity
caused a marked and sustained increase in m due to the
sustained increases in n and p. Although
hypertonicity also caused a large increase in vars
p, this increase was not linked to the increase in n or
p, because the decay of vars p was
much more rapid.
The following scenario is suggested to explain these results.
Moderate hypertonicity produces cell shrinkage which increases cytoplasmic Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i). In
the frog, this is reflected by a sustained increase in MEPP frequency
and nerve-evoked EPPs (Kita and van der Kloot 1977). A
sustained increase in [Ca2+]i would explain
the prolonged increase in p (Fig. 2C), if
p is related to [Ca2+]i at the
active zones (Provan and Miyamoto 1993
). Similarly, a
sustained increase in [Ca2+]i could explain
the increase in n (Fig. 2B), if n is
related to the number of functional (having docked vesicles) release
sites (Brown et al. 1976
). In this case, increased
[Ca2+]i would lead to phosphorylation of
synapsin I and migration of vesicles to release sites
(Llinás et al. 1991
). The sustained increase in
[Ca2+]i implies that the processes that
normally restore [Ca2+]i to resting levels
may be overloaded during hypertonic conditions. If so, differences in
the ability to regulate cell volume or
[Ca2+]i may explain the contrasting effects
seen in mammals and frogs. Finally, the gradual decrease in
m and p in hypertonic solution (Fig. 2,
A and C) may be because of a slow reduction in
[Ca2+]i resulting from the overloaded but
operational Ca2+ regulatory processes. Such a reduction in
[Ca2+]i might also explain the gradual
decrease in n if, as suggested, n reflects the
number of docked vesicles that result from Ca2+-induced
migration to the active zones.
Rosenmund and Stevens (1996) have suggested that
hypertonicity may promote quantal release in the absence of
Ca2+, conceivably by producing a conformational change in a
protein involved in exocytosis. This possibility does not obviate the present suggestion that the changes in n and p
observed in the presence of Ca2+ (Fig. 2,
B and C) may be because of an increase in
[Ca2+]i. In fact, Brosius et al.
(1992)
have demonstrated sustained increases in
[Ca2+]i in neurons exposed to hypertonic
solution in the presence or absence of extracellular
Ca2+.
Augmentation is believed to depend on Ca2+ influx
through voltage-gated calcium channels (Magleby 1987).
Accordingly, the disappearance of augmentation with hypertonicity (Fig.
1, A and B) indicates that Ca2+
influx may be reduced or eliminated under these conditions. In support
of this, Brosius et al. (1992)
and Rosenmund and
Stevens (1996)
have shown that voltage-gated Ca2+
currents are reduced by hypertonicity because of mechanical effects on
the channel and/or reduction in the Ca2+ gradient (as a
result of the increase in [Ca2+]i).
Agents that inhibit mitochondria under nonstimulated conditions
produce an increase in vars p, presumably by
inhibiting the uptake or promoting the release of mitochondrial
Ca2+ (Provan and Miyamoto 1995). Under
normal conditions, the uptake of cytoplasmic Ca2+ by these
organelles is intensified during tetanic stimulation (David et
al. 1998
), conceivably because the increase in Ca influx leads
to more available Ca2+ (increased
[Ca2+]i). Hypertonicity may enhance this
process by further increasing [Ca2+]i by
means of cell shrinkage. Accordingly, the dramatic increase in
vars p (Fig. 2D) may be because of
efflux of Ca2+ from mitochondria that are fully loaded
during tetanic stimulation under hypertonic conditions. In this regard,
Tang and Zucker (1997)
have suggested that potentiation
is due to the slow release of Ca2+ from mitochondria. Such
an explanation is consistent with the results in Fig. 2D
which show a remarkable similarity between the time constant of decay
for vars p (24.0 s) and the time constant of
decay for potentiation (23.7 s).
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
We thank D. M. Davis for technical assistance.
Present address of H. Cheng: Dept. of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Whitman Lab, 915 E. 57th St., University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.
![]() |
FOOTNOTES |
---|
Address for reprint requests: M. D. Miyamoto, Dept. of Pharmacology, P. O. Box 70577, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 5 October, 1998; accepted in final form 12 November 1998.
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Visit Other APS Journals Online |