CORRESPONDENCE

Re: Nutritional and Socioeconomic Factors in Relation to Prostate Cancer Mortality: a Cross-national Study

Paul K. Mills

Correspondence to: Paul K. Mills, Ph.D., Cancer registry of Central California, 1625 E. Shaw Ave., Suite 155, Fresno, CA 93710-8100.

In the discussion section of the recent ecologic mortality study of prostate cancer by Hebert et al. (1), several misleading statements are made concerning the cohort study of dietary and other lifestyle factors and prostate cancer among Seventh-day Adventist men that was published nearly 10 years ago (2). Specifically, Hebert et al. state that, in regard to the dietary findings presented in that study, "These results need to be interpreted cautiously because the authors do not provide details regarding their dietary assessment methodology." However, in a companion paper published in the same issue as the prostate cancer report, details were provided for the methodology of the entire cohort study, including the details of the dietary assessment methodology (3). In addition, the development of the dietary assessment technique used in the study was described years earlier, at the inception of the cohort study (4). Hebert et al. add that "their results for intake of other foods (e.g. beef, poultry, and milk) do not agree with the majority of the prostate cancer literature." This statement is untrue. Not only did our results suggest a role for moderately increased prostate cancer risk in association with increasing animal fat intake (multivariate adjusted relative risk for daily meat intake = 1.41; 95% confidence interval = 0.79-2.51), it was one of the first studies to identify a protective relationship between intake of several types of vegetables, notably beans, lentils, peas, raisins, and tomatoes and prostate cancer risk. The findings regarding tomato intake have been supported in several studies, particularly in other well-designed and conducted prospective cohort studies of prostate cancer incidence (5). Finally, Hebert et al. also erroneously state that "The results of that study may be unique because their sample comprised a homogeneous group of predominantly white middle-class vegetarian men." Indeed, the Adventist cohort was characterized by a wide degree of variation in socioeconomic status [see Table 7 in (3) for the distribution of education and occupation variables in male members of the cohort]. Additionally, dietary habits ranged from the pure vegetarian (i.e., the vegans) to the "omnivorous" diet in which several kinds of animal products are consumed to one degree or another. The Seventh-day Adventist church recommends, but does not require, church members to be vegetarian. An inspection of the person-years distributions of the meat-intake variables in the tables of our paper supports this wide range of dietary habits.

I hope this clarifies the interpretation of the findings from the Adventist Health Study with regard to diet and prostate cancer risk. The results from any international ecologic mortality study of a disease, such as prostate cancer that relies on food disappearance data as the "exposure variable," suffers from a multitude of methodologic limitations, which the authors have correctly noted. In addition, prostate cancer mortality as an outcome is influenced by several predictive factors, including screening practices, survival, and lifestyle as much as by biologic factors that may be etiologically relevant. However, a prospective, incidence-based cohort study, such as the Adventist Health Study, in which dietary data are collected at the individual level before the development of disease is more desirable in that it is rigorous and methodologically sound and offers much in the way of etiologic insight.

REFERENCES

1 Hebert JR, Hurley TG, Olendzki BC, Teas J, Ma Y, Hampl JS. Nutritional and socioeconomic factors in relation to prostate cancer mortality: a cross-national study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:1637-47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2 Mills PK, Beeson WL, Phillips RL, Fraser GE. Cohort study of diet, lifestyle, and prostate cancer in Adventist men. Cancer 1989;64:598-604.[Medline]

3 Beeson WL, Mills PK, Phillips RL, Andress M, Fraser GE. Chronic disease among Seventh-day Adventists, a low risk group. Rationale, methodology, and description of the population. Cancer 1989;64:570-81.[Medline]

4 Phillips RL, Kuzma J. Estimating major nutrient intake from self-administered food frequency questionnaires. Am J Epidemiol 1976;104:354-55.

5 Giovannucci E, Ascherio A, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC. Intake of carotenoids and retinol in relation to risk of prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:1767-76.[Abstract]


This article has been cited by other articles in HighWire Press-hosted journals:


             
Copyright © 1999 Oxford University Press (unless otherwise stated)
Oxford University Press Privacy Policy and Legal Statement