Affiliations of authors: J. J. Lee, D. Liu (Department of Biostatistics), J. S. Lee, J. M. Kurie, F. R. Khuri, A. Broxson, W. K. Hong (Department of Head and Neck/Thoracic Medical Oncology), H. Ibarguen, W. N. Hittelman (Department of Experimental Therapeutics), R. C. Morice (Department of Pulmonary Medicine), G. Walsh (Department of Thoracic Surgery), J. Y. Ro (Department of Pathology), The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Correspondence to: J. Jack Lee, Ph.D., Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Box 447, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030 (e-mail: jjlee{at}mdanderson.org).
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Several problems confront lung chemoprevention studies. First, it is difficult to identify individuals at highest lung cancer risk. Epidemiologic studies (47) suggest that lung cancer risk is a function of the cumulative tobacco smoking exposure and the intrinsic susceptibility of the exposed individual. Although individuals with a 20-pack-year smoking history have an approximately 10-fold increased lung cancer risk, only 10% may develop lung cancer in their lifetime. Moreover, lung cancer risk remains considerably elevated for many years after quitting smoking, such that nearly half of the newly diagnosed lung cancer cases in the United States occur in former smokers (8,9). Thus, lung cancer prevention studies that use lung cancer incidence as a primary endpoint require tens of thousands of subjects and tens of years of duration for adequate statistical interpretation. Unfortunately, all lung cancer prevention studies reported so far have had negative results and, in some cases, individuals who continued to smoke during the intervention had an adverse outcome (3,1012). Second, it is difficult to identify potentially efficacious chemopreventive agents (13,14). Unfortunately, little is known about lung tumorigenesis in humans or which molecular pathways to best target for chemoprevention. Therefore, biomarkers are needed to identify individuals at the highest risk for lung cancer and to provide intermediate surrogate markers of response. The development and incorporation of such biomarkers into chemoprevention trials would reduce the numbers of subjects required for adequate statistical evaluation, decrease the time needed to assess biologic efficacy, and help identify new molecular targets for intervention (15).
Lung tumorigenesis involves a field cancerization process whereby the lung is exposed to a carcinogenic insult (e.g., tobacco smoke), setting off a chronic pattern of tissue damage and wound healing (16). Chronic carcinogenic insult initiates a multistep process marked by cumulative histologic and genetic changes and proliferative clonal outgrowths throughout the lung (17,18). The development of metaplasia is one such step that has been used as a biomarker. In a study of 20-pack-year smokers (19), where bronchial biopsy specimens were obtained from six independent sites, squamous metaplasia was evident in at least one of the six sites in nearly 80% of the smokers. However, if the subjects stopped smoking, the metaplasia index (MI) fell from 37% to 17% within 6 months, and squamous metaplasia disappeared altogether in 50% of the subjects. Thus, the use of bronchial metaplasia as a biomarker of risk and response in chemoprevention trials involving former smokers is problematic.
Because abnormal epithelial proliferation is one hallmark of tumorigenesis, it was of interest to explore the feasibility of using a proliferation biomarker to assess tobacco smoke-associated bronchial changes. Although proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) was shown to correlate well with histologic changes in the lungs of chronic smokers (20), there is some concern regarding its use as a proliferation marker because PCNA is also a component of a DNA repair pathway, which may be active in chronically damaged tissues, such as the smoking-exposed lung (21).
A number of additional proliferation markers are available that identify different aspects of proliferating cells (22). For example, Ki-67 is a proliferation marker that is expressed in all phases of cycling cells but not in resting cells (23). In lung tumors, the fraction of Ki-67-positive cells was generally increased and of some prognostic value, especially when used in combination with other tumor parameters (24,25). Increased numbers of Ki-67-positive cells have also been detected in the aerodigestive tract epithelium of smokers compared with nonsmokers (26,27). However, little is known about the relationship between Ki-67 expression, smoking history, and the long-term consequences of quitting smoking on the proliferation of bronchial epithelium.
In this report, we determined the feasibility of Ki-67 staining as a biomarker for use in chemoprevention trials. In particular, we determined the relationship between the Ki-67-labeling index in the bronchial epithelium of chronic smokers, squamous metaplasia, and the subject's smoking characteristics and determined the impact of quitting smoking on the proliferative activity in the bronchial epithelium.
![]() |
SUBJECTS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Baseline tissue samples from 120 current and 207 former smokers participating in two randomized chemoprevention trials were analyzed in this report. Current smokers were defined as active smokers or smokers who had quit smoking within 1 year of registration onto the respective chemoprevention trials; former smokers were those who quit smoking for at least 1 year at the time of registration. Smoking history was measured by packs/day, smoke-years, and pack-years, which is the product of packs/day and smoke-years.
The first trial was designed to study the chemopreventive effect of N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide in smokers with a minimum of 20 pack-years of smoking history and detectable bronchial squamous metaplasia and/or dysplasia at the time of the screening bronchoscopy. Study subjects may have had a prior tobacco-related cancer but must have been tumor free for at least 6 months before enrollment (28). One hundred thirty-nine smokers were registered in the first trial from April 1994 through December 1998 and, among them, 137 (120 current smokers and 17 former smokers; 80 randomly assigned and 57 not randomly assigned) had tissue samples available for the biomarker analysis. The presence of squamous metaplasia was required for the subjects to be randomly assigned to receive the chemopreventive agent or placebo but was not necessary for the subjects to be included in this report.
The second ongoing, randomized trial is evaluating the effect of 13-cis-retinoic acid plus -tocopherol versus 9-cis-retinoic acid versus placebo in former smokers. To be eligible for receiving randomly assigned treatment in the trial, former smokers needed to have a minimum of 20 pack-years of smoking history but did not need to have squamous metaplasia or dysplasia. One hundred ninety former smokers were registered in the trial from November 1995 through June 2000 (target sample size for registration = 225). All registered subjects in both trials, whether randomly assigned or not, who had available baseline tissue samples were included in this report.
Both trials were approved by the Institutional Review Board, and all study subjects provided written informed consent.
Bronchial Biopsy and Tissue Preparation
A baseline bronchoscopy was performed for all participants at the time of registration for their respective chemoprevention trial. Biopsy specimens were taken at six predetermined sites in the bronchial tree, including the main carina, the bifurcation of the right upper lobe and the mainstem bronchus, the bifurcation of the right middle lobe and right lower lobe, the bifurcation of the left upper lobe and lingula, the medial bronchus of the right lower lobe, and the anterior bronchus of the left lower lobe. The biopsy specimens were fixed in 10% buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned. The first 10 4-µm tissue sections from each biopsy site were stained with hematoxylineosin and evaluated for the presence of squamous metaplasia and dysplasia. The MI was calculated as the percentage of biopsy sections exhibiting squamous metaplasia out of the total number of sections examined (19).
Immunohistochemical Analysis of Ki-67
One 4-µm tissue section from each biopsy specimen was immunocytochemically stained for Ki-67 expression and evaluated for proliferative activity. A positive control section of HeLa cells was placed on each sample slide to serve as an internal control for the immunostaining procedure. The tissue sections were deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated through a series of alcohols, and immersed in 3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 15 minutes to block endogenous peroxidase activity. Antigen retrieval was accomplished by placing slides in citrate buffer (pH = 6.0) and heating in a 800-W microwave at 100% power for two 4-minute periods. The slides were then blocked in 2% horse serum in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 37 °C for 30 minutes, treated with a 1 : 10 dilution of MIB 1 mouse anti-Ki-67 antibody (Zymed Laboratories Inc., South San Francisco, CA), and incubated overnight at 4 °C. After the slides were brought to room temperature for 15 minutes and sequentially washed in PBSD (PBS + 0.1% Tween 20) and PBS, biotinylated anti-mouse immunoglobulin G secondary antibody (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA) was applied in blocking solution (2% horse serum) and incubated at 37 °C for 30 minutes. The slides were washed sequentially with PBSD and then PBS, processed with the ABC kit (Vector Laboratories, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's recommendation, and reacted with 0.5 mg/mL of diaminobenzidine and 0.6% hydrogen peroxide. The color reaction was stopped by washing the slides in water. The slides were lightly counterstained in hematoxylin, washed in water, allowed to dry, and mounted in Eukit.
The fraction of Ki-67-positive cells was determined separately in the basal, parabasal, and, whenever present, superficial epithelial layers of the bronchial biopsy specimens and were expressed as the percentage of cells with positive nuclear staining (labeling index). Slides with inadequate HeLa staining or bronchial sections lacking epithelial cells (i.e., tangential cuts) were excluded from the analysis. Among 327 subjects, 1558 biopsy specimens could be evaluated for a basal-layer Ki-67-labeling index (Ki-67 BLI), and 1553 biopsy specimens could be evaluated for a parabasal-layer Ki-67-labeling index (Ki-67 PLI). Only 168 biopsy specimens had superficial layers that could be evaluated. Because about 2% of the cells in the superficial layer stained positive, we excluded the superficial layer Ki-67 results from the main analysis. Analyses of the Ki-67-labeling indices are presented both on a per-site basis and on a per-subject basis (the average of all biopsy specimens that could be evaluated within a participant).
Statistical Analysis
Summary statistics, including frequency tabulation, mean, standard deviation, median, and range, were given to characterize the distribution of covariates, as well as the cell proliferation indices (Ki-67 BLI and Ki-67 PLI) and MI. When the subject was used as the analysis unit, the mean Ki-67 value over six biopsy sites was computed for both the basal and the parabasal layers. Box plots were used to display the distribution of the three indices (Ki-67 BLI, Ki-67 PLI, and MI). Scatter plots with added nonparametric regression lines by use of lowess smoothing was applied to show the correlation between continuous variables. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to test for equal median between two continuous variables without the Gaussian distribution assumption. Spearman's rank correlation was applied to estimate the association between continuous variables. The between-subject and within-subject variabilities were estimated by the variance component model. The linear mixed-effect model was applied to model the effect of covariates on the three indices that used the biopsy site as the analysis unit but assumed that the site was nested within the subjects. Statistical analysis was performed by use of standard statistical software, including SAS Release 8.1 and S-Plus 2000 (29,30). Only data from baseline specimens were included in this study. No attempt was made to analyze the treatment effect and biomarker modulation in this report. All of the P values reported were based on two-sided tests.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
|
|
|
Of interest, in subjects who quit smoking, Ki-67 BLI, Ki-67 PLI, and MI were negatively correlated with number of years of smoking cessation (r = .16 [P = .02], r = .15 [P = .02] and r = .15 [P = .02], respectively). We then further examined the kinetics between these parameters and years of smoking cessation. After adjustment for the squamous metaplasia status, the proliferation indices were statistically significantly decreased within the first year of smoking cessation (Q [quit]<1; P = .008; linear mixed-effect model for Ki-67 PLI), further decreased in years 12 (Q12) and in years 25 (Q25) after quitting smoking, and decreased only slightly thereafter (Fig. 3, B). In addition, the kinetics of the reduction in the MI after quitting smoking were more rapid than that of the proliferation indices, with the median MI decreasing from 26.7 to 0 within the first year and remaining at 0 thereafter. Only 28% of the former smokers had evidence of squamous metaplasia. The strong association between the reduction in Ki-67 PLI and quitting smoking after adjustment for squamous metaplasia supports that notion that Ki-67 assessment provides additional information beyond that of histology. More important, Ki-67 PLI remained measurable for many years after smoking cessation, and high Ki-67 PLI and Ki-67 BLI could still be detected even 20 years after quitting smoking in a subset of former smokers.
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Our results have several implications for the role of smoking in the pathogenesis of lung cancer (31,32). The finding that a doseresponse relationship exists between Ki-67-labeling indices and the intensity of smoking exposure measured by the number of packs smoked per day in active smokers suggests that smoking exposure elicits proliferative activity in the lung, perhaps associated with chronic wound healing that occurs after smoking-induced tissue damage. Moreover, the findings that 1) the levels of proliferation decreased in a time-dependent fashion after quitting smoking and 2) the relationship between the level of prior smoking intensity and proliferative activity was not seen after quitting smoking further supports a direct relationship between smoking exposure and proliferative activity.
Although the proliferative activity differed greatly among individuals who had comparable smoking histories, those who had increased proliferation at one lung site tended to have increased proliferation at other sites. These findings suggest that, although individuals may differ in their response to carcinogenic insult, the impact of the carcinogenic exposure can be detected throughout the lung, in any area from which a biopsy specimen can be taken. This observation provides direct support for the field-cancerization hypothesis. While the basis for interindividual susceptibility is not well understood, molecular epidemiologic studies (33,34) have identified several genetic and physiologic factors (i.e., cytochrome P450 and glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms, chromosome damage by mutagens, and DNA repair activities) that distinguish individuals with and without lung cancer. It is, therefore, of considerable interest to examine the relationship between the various intrinsic susceptibility factors, smoking histories, and proliferative activity in the lungs of smokers. Although the relationship between Ki-67-labeling indices and lung cancer risk is not yet known, it is intriguing that some individuals with a history of smoking-associated cancer had higher levels of proliferative activity in their bronchial epithelium, perhaps reflecting their known increased risk for second primary cancers.
Proliferative activity in the bronchial epithelium decreased with time in former smokers following smoking cessation. However, this study was cross-sectional in nature, with the conclusions based on single measurements of different individuals at different stages in their smoking history. Nevertheless, a statistically significant drop in proliferation within the first year of quitting smoking supports our previous longitudinal observations that used the proliferation marker PCNA (20). The kinetics of the reduction in the Ki-67 PLI was slower than in the Ki-67 BLI. This suggests that the factors that control epithelial proliferation may be different between the basal layer, thought to harbor the reserve progenitor cells for tissue renewal, and the parabasal layer, thought to harbor the expanding pool of committed cells. Previously, we noted an association between PCNA expression and epidermal growth factor receptor expression in bronchial biopsy specimens from both active smokers and those who quit smoking during the first 6 months of chemopreventive intervention (20). We and others (35,36) have detected clonal genetic changes in these same biopsy specimens that might impact cell cycle regulation (i.e., loss of heterozygosity at chromosomes 9p and 3p involving genes for p16, fragile histidine triad, and other putative tumor suppressor genes). These biopsy specimens thus provide a unique opportunity to better understand the molecular forces driving proliferative clonal outgrowth in the lungs of current and former smokers.
Our results have several implications for lung cancer prevention. Primary chemoprevention trials that rely on the development of cancer as a primary endpoint are difficult to accomplish because of the large numbers of subjects and long follow-up times required. It is, therefore, important to identify surrogate endpoint biomarkers (37,38). Although histologic changes reflect abnormal regulation of the lung epithelia, they have some drawbacks as biomarkers. For example, squamous metaplasia can reflect a reactive condition and may rapidly disappear in individuals who quit smoking. This can create problems interpreting chemopreventive responses in former smokers where bronchial squamous metaplasia is an infrequent event. Moreover, in chemoprevention trials where the incidence of squamous metaplasia varies widely among individuals, large sample sizes would be required for testing treatment effects. Furthermore, the MI is a qualitative endpoint, and its subjectivity makes it prone to interobserver variations.
By contrast, Ki-67-labeling indices possess several desirable properties for their use as biomarkers in chemoprevention trials. First, Ki-67-labeling indices can be measured in former smokers long after they have quit smoking. Second, Ki-67-labeling indices can be potentially modulated by chemopreventive interventions. Third, Ki-67-labeling indices correlate with the MI so that elevated levels can be detected even in bronchial sites that lack histologic evidence of squamous metaplasia. Thus, Ki-67-labeling index at one site in the lung may reflect more global changes occurring throughout the lung. However, variance-component analysis suggests that multiple biopsy specimens are required to gain an adequate estimate for the whole lung.
Ki-67-labeling indices may also be useful markers for lung cancer risk. There was considerable interindividual variation in the proliferative activity between those with comparable smoking histories, suggesting that Ki-67-labeling indices may reflect differential individual downstream consequences of both carcinogen exposure and intrinsic susceptibility factors. Moreover, subjects with a history of smoking-related cancer, known to be at an increased lung cancer risk, had elevated Ki-67 BLI. It is, therefore, intriguing that some individuals continued to have relatively high proliferative levels in their lung epithelium for many years after they quit smoking. Previously, we showed that normal and premalignant epithelia adjacent to head and neck cancers (i.e., epithelium in a tissue field with a 100% chance of developing a tumor) had increased proliferation levels, suggesting that the degree of abnormal epithelial proliferation may be related to long-term cancer risk (39). Continued follow-up of the individuals participating in our chemoprevention trials will provide insight into the role of Ki-67 labeling as a marker of lung cancer risk.
Although dysregulated proliferation is a hallmark in tumorigenesis, it is unclear whether it is important in the evolution of a tumor. There is some evidence (40) to suggest that the loss of cell cycle control can lead to increased genetic instability, thus accelerating the accumulation of genetic changes important for tumor development. Similarly, dysregulated epithelial proliferation associated with altered epithelialstromal interactions has also been associated with increased genetic instability and subsequent tumor development (41). The same biopsy specimens examined in this study are also being examined for chromosome instability (42), which will provide a unique opportunity to explore the relationship between altered epithelial proliferation and genetic instability. Several chemoprevention candidate agents are hypothesized to directly or indirectly target proliferative pathways (14). The assessment of Ki-67 labeling as a biomarker should prove to be highly useful in chemoprevention studies, especially when considered with measurements of other markers known to influence tumorigenesis.
![]() |
NOTES |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
1
Greenlee RT, Hill-Harmon MB, Murray T, Thun M. Cancer statistics, 2001. CA Cancer J Clin 2001;51:1536.
2 Johnson BE, Cortazar P, Chute JP. Second lung cancers in patients successfully treated for lung cancer. Semin Oncol 1997;24:4929.[Medline]
3
Lippman SM, Lee JJ, Karp DD, Vokes EE, Benner SE, Goodman GE, et al. Randomized Phase III Intergroup Trial of Isotretinoin to Prevent Second Primary Tumors in Stage I Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:60518.
4
Peto R, Darby S, Deo H, Silcocks P, Whitley E, Doll R. Smoking, smoking cessation, and lung cancer in the UK since 1950: combination of national statistics with two casecontrol studies. BMJ 2000;321:3239.
5 Smith RA, Glynn TJ. Epidemiology of lung cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 2000;38:45370.[Medline]
6
Wei Q, Cheng L, Amos CI, Wang LE, Guo Z, Hong WK, et al. Repair of tobacco carcinogen-induced DNA adducts and lung cancer risk: a molecular epidemiologic study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:176472.
7 Haugen A, Ryberg D, Mollerup S, Zienolddiny S, Skaug V, Svendsrud DH. Geneenvironment interactions in human lung cancer. Toxicol Lett 2000;112113:2337.
8 Lubin JH, Blot WJ. Lung cancer and smoking cessation: patterns of risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:4223.[Medline]
9 Tong L, Spitz MR, Fueger JJ, Amos CA. Lung carcinoma in former smokers. Cancer 1996;78:100410.[Medline]
10
The Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta Carotene Cancer Prevention Study Group. The effect of vitamin E and beta carotene on the incidence of lung cancer and other cancers in male smokers. N Engl J Med 1994;330:102935.
11
Omenn GS, Goodman GE, Thornquist MD, Balmes J, Cullen MR, Glass A, et al. Effects of a combination of beta carotene and vitamin A on lung cancer and cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 1996;334:11505.
12
van Zandwijk N, Dalesio O, Pastorino U, de Vries N, van Tinteren H. EUROSCAN, a randomized trial of vitamin A and N-acetylcysteine in patients with head and neck cancer or lung cancer. For the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Head and Neck and Lung Cancer Cooperative Groups. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:97786.
13 Steele VE, Boone CW, Lubet RA, Crowell JA, Holmes CA, Sigman CC, et al. Preclinical drug development paradigms for chemopreventives. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1998;12:94361.[Medline]
14 Kelloff GJ, Sigman CC, Greenwald P. Cancer chemoprevention: progress and promise. Eur J Cancer 1999;35:20318.[Medline]
15
Lippman SM, Lee JJ, Sabichi AL. Cancer chemoprevention: progress and promise. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:151428.
16 Slaughter DP, Southwick HW, Smejkal W. Field cancerization in oral stratified squamous epithelium: clinical implications of multicentric origin. Cancer 1953;6:9638.[Medline]
17 Auerbach O, Stout AP, Hammond EC, Garfinkel L. Changes in bronchial epithelium in relation to cigarette smoking and in relation to lung cancer. N Engl J Med 1961;265:25367.
18 Hittelman WN. Genetic instability assessments in the lung cancerization field. In: Brambilla C, Brambilla E, editors. Lung tumors: fundamental biology and clinical management. New York (NY): Marcel-Dekker; 1999. p. 25567.
19 Lee JS, Lippman SM, Benner SE, Lee JJ, Ro JR, Lukeman JM, et al. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of isotretinoin in chemoprevention of bronchial squamous metaplasia. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:93745.[Abstract]
20
Khuri FR, Lee JS, Lippman SM, Lee JJ, Kalapurakal S, Yu R, et al. Modulation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen in the bronchial epithelium of smokers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2001;10:3118.
21 McCormick D, Hall PA. The complexities of proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Histopathology 1992;21:5914.[Medline]
22 Yu CC, Woods AL, Levison DA. The assessment of cellular proliferation by immunohistochemistry: a review of currently available methods and their applications. Histochem J 1992;24:12131.[Medline]
23 Scholzen T, Gerdes J. The Ki-67 protein: from the known and the unknown. J Cell Physiol 2000;182:31122.[Medline]
24
Hommura F, Dosaka-Akita H, Mishina T, Nishi M, Kojima T, Hiroumi H, et al. Prognostic significance of p27KIP1 protein and Ki-67 growth fraction in non-small cell lung cancers. Clin Cancer Res 2000;6:407381.
25 Nguyen VN, Mirejovsky P, Mirejovsky T, Melinova L, Mandys V. Expression of cyclin D1, Ki-67 and PCNA in non-small cell lung cancer: prognostic significance and comparison with p53 and bcl-2. Acta Histochem 2000;102:32338.[Medline]
26 van Oijen MG, Gilsing MM, Rijksen G, Hordijk GJ, Slootweg PJ. Increased number of proliferating cells in oral epithelium from smokers and ex-smokers. Oral Oncol 1998;34:297303.[Medline]
27
Barsky SH, Roth MD, Kleerup EC, Siimmons M, Tashkin DP. Histopathologic and molecular alterations in bronchial epithelium in habitual smokers of marijuana, cocaine, and/or tobacco. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:1198205.
28
Kurie JM, Lee JS, Khuri FR, Mao L, Morice RC, Lee, JJ, et al. N-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)retinamide in the chemoprevention of squamous metaplasia and dysplasia of the bronchial epithelium. Clin Cancer Res 2000;6:29739.
29 SAS user guide. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc.; 1998.
30 S-PLUS 2000 guide to statistics. Seattle (WA): MathSoft, Inc., 2000.
31
Perera FP. Molecular epidemiology: insights into cancer susceptibility, risk assessment, and prevention. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996;88:496509.
32 Hussain SP, Harris CC. Molecular epidemiology and carcinogenesis: endogenous and exogenous carcinogens. Mutat Res 2000;462:31122.[Medline]
33 Wu X, Shi H, Jiang H, Kemp B, Hong WK, Delclos GL, et al. Associations between cytochrome P4502E1 genotype, mutagen sensitivity, cigarette smoking and susceptibility to lung cancer. Carcinogenesis 1997;18:96773.[Abstract]
34 Wei Q, Spitz MR. The role of DNA repair capacity in susceptibility to lung cancer: a review. Cancer Metastasis Rev 1997;16:295307.[Medline]
35
Mao L, Lee JS, Kurie JM, Fan YH, Lippman SM, Lee JJ, et al. Clonal genetic alterations in the lungs of current and former smokers. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89:85762.
36
Wistuba II, Lam S, Behrens C, Virmani AK, Fong KM, LeRiche J, et al. Molecular damage in the bronchial epithelium of current and former smokers. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997; 89:136673.
37 Misset JL, Mathe G, Santelli G, Gouveia J, Homasson JP, Sudre MC, et al. Regression of bronchial epidermoid metaplasia in heavy smokers with etretinate treatment. Cancer Detect Prev 1986;9:16770.[Medline]
38
Franklin WA. Diagnosis of lung cancer: pathology of invasive and preinvasive neoplasia. Chest 2000;117(4 Suppl 1):80S89S.
39 Shin DM, Voravud N, Ro JY, Lee JS, Hong WK, Hittelman WN. Sequential increases in proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression in head and neck tumorigenesis: a potential biomarker. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:9718.[Abstract]
40 Tlsty TD. Genomic instability and its role in neoplasia. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 1997;221:3746.[Medline]
41 Sternlicht MD, Lochter A, Sympson CJ, Huey B, Rougier JP, Gray JW, et al. The stromal proteinase MMP3/stromelysin-1 promotes mammary carcinogenesis. Cell 1999;98:13746.[Medline]
42 Hittelman WN, Lee JJ, Lee JS, Yu R, Kurie J, Mao L, et al. Persistent genetic instability despite decreased proliferation in human lung tissue following smoking cessation [abstract]. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 1998;39:336.
Manuscript received January 12, 2001; revised May 15, 2001; accepted May 17, 2001.
This article has been cited by other articles in HighWire Press-hosted journals:
![]() |
||||
|
Oxford University Press Privacy Policy and Legal Statement |