Correspondence to: John D. Potter, M.D., Ph.D., Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N. MP702, P.O. Box 19024, Seattle, WA 98109-1024 (e-mail: jpotter{at}fhcrc.org).
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() |
DESCRIPTIVE EPIDEMIOLOGY |
---|
The international differences, migrant data, and recent rapid changes in incidence rates in Italy, Japan, urban China, and male Polynesians in Hawaii (3,4) show that colon cancer particularly is highly sensitive to changes in the environment. Among immigrants and their descendants, incidence rates rapidly reach those of the host country, sometimes within the migrating generation (7,8). The 20-fold international difference may be explained, in large part, by dietary and other environmental differences; indeed, although incidence rates in Japan have been low even until quite recently, the highest rates in the world are now seen among Hawaiian Japanese (3). However, colorectal cancer has long been known to occur more frequently in certain families (9), and there are several rare genetic syndromes that carry a markedly elevated risk (10-12). Colorectal cancer is thus causally related to both genes and environment.
![]() |
INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL EPIDEMIOLOGY |
---|
Most of the caveats regarding the interpretation of dietary data are well known and will not be repeated here. For extensive treatment of those issues, the reader is referred to the publication by Willett (13) and the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) report (14). We have recently reviewed both case-control and cohort studies of the associations between dietary factors and risk of colorectal neoplasia (14-16), and the reader is referred to those publications for many of the relevant citations and for more detail. The major findings are provided here, along with the most recent publications. As a central underpinning to the interpretation of data, the reader is also referred to criteria for drawing causal inferences from epidemiologic studies, first articulated by Hill (17). Discussion of causality specifically in relation to diet and cancer is found in chapter 3 of reference (14).
Vegetables, fruits, fiber, and micronutrients. There are at least seven published cohort studies of colorectal neoplasia and consumption of vegetables and fruits. Four studies [see references (14-16)] examined vegetable and fruit consumption and colon cancer risk and reported modest (and not entirely consistent) findings of lower risk in association with higher consumption. One study reported on rectal cancer in Seventh-day Adventists, showing a small, statistically nonsignificant reduction in risk with higher consumption of green salad. The most recent cohort study of Seventh-day Adventists (18) notes a somewhat lower risk of colorectal cancer with higher intake of a variety of plant foods (statistically significant only for legumes). One study of adenomatous polyps in men (19) reported an approximate halving of risk with higher intake of vegetable and fruit fiber.
There are at least 21 case-control studies of colon cancer and vegetable and fruit consumption, and 17 of these studies reported some degree of reduced risk with higher consumption of at least one category of vegetable or fruit (14,15). Decreased risks of colon cancer have been particularly consistent for raw vegetables, green vegetables, and cruciferous vegetables. A meta-analysis of six case-control studies of vegetables and colon cancer (20) found a combined odds ratio (OR) of 0.48 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.41-0.57) for highest versus lowest quintiles of consumption. There are 13 case-control studies of rectal cancer; 10 reported on statistical significance and, of these 10 studies, eight showed a significant inverse association for at least one vegetable or fruit category. Results were most consistent for cruciferous vegetables. Each of five case-control studies of adenomas that examined vegetables as a broad category found an inverse association that was, however, not always statistically significant (14,15). Studies of fruit consumption and colorectal cancer risk are less abundant, and the findings are less clear than those for vegetables.
Foods high in fiber include vegetables as well as grains. A role for dietary fiber in colon carcinogenesis was first proposed by Burkitt (21). Data from cohort studies were weakly supportive of the fiber hypothesis, with two studies finding no association and two finding a weak inverse association. The most recent cohort study of total dietary fiber (22) found no association with either carcinoma or adenoma in women. Only one prospective study has provided data on rectal cancer; there was little evidence of an association. A combined analysis of 13 case-control studies found a reduction in colorectal cancer risk with increasing intake of dietary fiber (23). Similar findings have been reported in a meta-analysis of 16 case-control studies (20). Fiber from vegetables and cereals, in a prospective study (19), has been associated with a more than halving of risk for colorectal adenomas in men. Case-control studies (14) have found inverse associations with total fiber, fiber from cereals, and fiber from vegetables and fruits.
There are no clearly supportive data from intervention trials in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) (except in a post-hoc analysis of adherent individuals) (24), and fiber had no statistically significant effect on the occurrence of metachronous sporadic adenomas (25).
Overall, the relationship between fiber intake and risk of colorectal cancer, although often inverse, is somewhat inconsistent, not the least because of the heterogeneous nature of fiber and differences in the way in which fiber is measured (26); nonetheless, the limited data on humans do not suggest a stronger effect for any source or type of fiber. The WCRF report (14) concluded, "evidence that diets rich in vegetables protect against cancers of the colon and rectum is convincing." It was also concluded (14), "diets high in fiber possibly decrease the risk of colorectal cancer" but "the data on fruit are more limited and inconsistent; no judgement is possible."
Other nutrients have been invoked to explain the reduced risk of colorectal cancer in association with consumption of vegetables (16,27). Many of these nutrients are not readily measurable in epidemiologic studies, but several micronutrients have been reported on (including carotenoids, ascorbate, and folate). The reader is referred to the WCRF report (14) for more detail.
Freudenheim et al. (28), who first proposed the folate-colorectal cancer hypothesis, found lower risks of both colon and rectal cancers in association with high folate intakes in their case-control study. Total folate intake and dietary folate were not associated, however, with differences in risk of colon cancer in a cohort of men (29). Nonetheless, an increase in risk of colon cancer was seen among men with low intakes of folate and methionine and high intakes of alcohol. Similar results were shown for adenomatous polyps in the same cohort study (30). In a large multicenter case-control study, Slattery et al. (31) found no association between micronutrients involved in methyl-group metabolism and risk of colon cancer. The role of genetic variability in folate metabolism is discussed below in the section entitled "Genetic PredispositionHigh-Prevalence Polymorphisms." Overall, the data suggest that the relationship between risk of colorectal cancer and intake of vegetables is more consistent (as well as having a considerably larger literature) than any of the specific micronutrients.
Meat and fat. To mid-1997, seven cohort studies (reported in eight papers) had examined meat intake and the risk of colorectal neoplasia. See references (14,15) for original citations and greater detail. A study of Seventh-day Adventistsa predominantly vegetarian populationreported that meat intake was not associated with risk of colorectal cancer. The Nurses' Health Study reported that women who consumed red meat frequently compared with women who consumed red meat rarely had a statistically significant 2.5-fold increase in risk of colon cancer. Men who consumed five or more servings per week of beef, pork, or lamb had a moderately increased risk of colon cancer when compared with men who consumed these meats less than once per month. In contrast, the American Cancer Society cohort showed no difference in risk between uppermost and lowest quintiles of meat consumption in either sex. The Iowa Women's Health Study and The Netherlands and Finnish cohorts also showed no increase in risk with meat consumption. Two of the four cohort studies that examined intake of processed meat showed statistically significant higher risks of colorectal cancer with higher consumption, and one showed a weakly elevated risk. Only one study was null. Thus, there are only studies showing increased risk and those that are null. As the WCRF report (14) notes, of the 16 estimates of relative risk associated with meat consumption reported in these cohort studies, eight were greater than 1.5 or statistically significantly greater than 1.0, eight were between 0.75 and 1.5, and none was less than 0.75 or statistically significantly less than 1.0; i.e., the weight of the evidence points to an elevated risk, even though the findings are neither strong nor consistent. A cohort study among New York women (32) did not find an association with meat consumption. Most recently, two other cohort studies (18,33) focused on meat consumption among low-consuming populations. One study (33) found no association with colorectal cancer mortality, although the researchers were able to detect an association between meat consumption and coronary heart disease. The other study (18) found an elevated risk in Seventh-day Adventists in association with higher consumption of both red meat and white meat.
In the literature to date, there are at least 26 case-control studies of colorectal neoplasia (23 of cancer and three of adenomatous polyps). As with the cohort studies, almost all estimates of risk are increased or null with higher intake of meat. Each of 16 studies conducted in Europe, South America, Australia, and the United States reported one or more statistically significant elevated ORs with higher consumption of meat; see references (14,15) for original citations and greater detail. Some of these elevated risks were specific to, or more marked in, women; some findings were more obvious for the rectum than for the colon. Two other studies in Australia and the United States showed weak increases in risk with higher intakes of meat. Seven of the 26 studies were essentially null. Again, as noted in the WCRF report (14), among the 86 estimates of risk associated with these studies, 47 were greater than 1.5 or statistically significantly greater than 1.0, 31 were between 0.75 and 1.5, and eight were less than 0.75 or statistically significantly less than 1.0 (of these eight, only five were statistically significantly less than 1.0 and the other three were associated with pork in studies in Australia and Belgium); these last three studies showed statistically significant increases in risk with higher consumption of beef. The other two findings of reduced risk with higher consumption came from the study in China and were seen for rectal, but not for colon, cancer. Five of the studies that reported on processed or cured meats found statistically significantly elevated risks, whereas the other four showed no association.
Gerhardsson de Verdier et al. (34) reported an OR for colon cancer of 2.7 (95% CI = 1.4-5.9) for the most frequent consumers of fried meat with a heavily browned surface; they reported a higher risk (OR = 6.0; 95% CI = 2.9-12.6) for rectal cancer. Schiffman and Felton (35) also reported a 3.5-fold increase in risk for those preferring well-done meat. Comparable findings have been seen in a case-control study of adenomatous polyps (36). Heterocyclic amines are produced when meat is cooked. These compounds and their genetically variable metabolism are discussed below in the section entitled "Genetic PredispositionHigh-Prevalence Polymorphisms."
Whether the weaker findings in the cohort studies compared with the case-control studies are due to selection or recall bias in the latter or increasing time from baseline in the former remains to be resolved (37). It is not yet clear whether the risk that is observed involves animal fat (the epidemiologic data are discussed below), processing, or cooking methods.
As with the exploration of constituent nutrients in vegetables, epidemiologic studies have been undertaken to explore the association between risk of colorectal cancer and some of the important measurable nutrients found in meat (including fat, saturated/animal fat, protein, and iron).
The large majority of the case-control studies of fat reported increased risks in association with higher intakes; ORs ranged from 1.3 to 2.2. Again, see references (14,15) for original citations and greater detail. Eleven studies attempted to distinguish fat from total energy intake. Four of the five cohort studies found no association, whereas the Nurses' Health Study reported that total fat intake in the uppermost versus the lowest quintile was associated with a twofold increased risk of colon cancer. Results from five case-control studies that adjusted for energy intake were mixed; three studies found no association, and two found statistically significant increases in risk. A cohort study of colorectal cancer among Hawaiian-Japanese men reported decreased risk with higher intakes of total fat.
Howe et al. (38) reported on a combined analysis of 13 case-control studies of colorectal cancer, involving 5287 case patients and 10 478 control subjects from various populations with differing cancer risks and diets. There was no evidence of any increased risk with any dietary fat variable after adjustment for total energy intake. Furthermore, there were no statistically significant associations for any type of fat in subgroup analyses by sex, age, or anatomic location of the cancer.
Thus, recent cohort studies and the combined analysis of 13 case-control studies have failed to find clear evidence for the association of colorectal cancer with dietary fat intake observed in many early studies.
Five cohort studies have reported specifically on saturated or animal fat. One study reported that high intake of saturated fat was associated with a reduced risk of colon cancer and a moderately increased risk of rectal cancer. In contrast, the much larger Nurses' Health Study of women found that those with the highest intakes of animal fat were at almost twofold greater risk than those with the lowest intakes. Weaker increases in risk were seen with high consumption of saturated fat. A small increase in risk for colon cancer was reported for women but not for men in The Netherlands cohort. No substantial associations between saturated or animal fat were seen in two other cohort studies. Fourteen case-control studies have examined associations between intakes of saturated and/or animal fat and the risk of colon, rectal, or colorectal cancer; results from these studies were inconsistent.
In summary, of the 19 cohort and case-control studies, 11 showed some evidence of elevated risk associated with higher intakes of saturated/animal fat, two showed weak inverse associations, and six show no association. Thus, while the evidence is consistent with a stronger risk with saturated/animal fat than with total fat, the data are not entirely convincing. Giovannucci and Goldin (39) concluded that the association with red meat consumption does not appear to be mediated by its lipid content. Evidence for explanations via protein and iron appears weaker still (14).
Overall, the data suggest a stronger association of colorectal cancer with meat than with any of the associated nutrients and that, while both processing of meat and saturated/animal fat are possibly associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer, neither total fat nor total protein seems to play a major role.
Calcium. The association between higher intake of calcium and colorectal neoplasia has been explored in both cohort and case-control studies [see references (14,15)]. The results are tantalizing, but not consistent, although most of the evidence suggests a reduced risk or no association. There are intervention data to show that calcium reduces proliferation in the upper part of the colonic crypt (40) and observational data that calcium reduces the likelihood of metachronous adenomas (41). Most recently, a double-blind, placebo-controlled intervention trial (42) showed a statistically significant 15%-20% reduction in the incidence of metachronous colorectal adenomas.
Other diet- and food-related variables. Some other food and dietary-behavior variables are, to varying degrees, associated with increased risk of colorectal neoplasia (e.g., egg consumption, sugar intake, and frequency of eating), and some are associated with possibly decreased risk of colorectal neoplasia (e.g., complex carbohydrate, vitamin D, and vitamin E). See references (14,15).
Physical Activity and Body Mass
Physical activity. The relationship between physical activity and a reduced risk of colon cancer is among the most consistent findings in the epidemiologic literature, reported in studies of occupational activity, leisure activity, and total activity. Again, see references (14,15) for original citations and greater detail. Of nine cohort studies, only two have reported no substantial association. Case-control studies were also consistent: Of 11 studies, only one study noted an increased risk of colon cancer with higher total activity; the remaining studies showed inverse associations. Individuals with high levels of activity throughout their lives were found to have the lowest risk, whereas those who reported high levels of activity were more recently reported to show weaker inverse associations. There is little evidence that physical activity modifies rectal cancer risk.
Body mass. Four cohort studies and eight case-control studies have found that men who are in the highest quintile for body size, classifiable as obese, have as much as a twofold increased risk of colon cancer (14,15,18). In contrast, one cohort and four case-control studies have shown no association between body mass index (BMI), i.e., weight in kg/height in m2, and colon cancer risk in men (14,15). Data on women are more inconsistent. Two cohort studies have reported no association between BMI and risk of colorectal cancer. However, the Iowa Women's Health Study showed that subjects who were in the highest quintile of BMI had a statistically significant 40% higher risk than those who were in the lowest quintile. Three case-control studies have also reported inconsistent findings for women.
A large U.S. multicenter case-control study (approximately 2000 case patients and 2400 control subjects) noted that, while BMI was not associated with elevated risk at high levels of long-term vigorous physical activity, risk appeared to be related both to total energy intake and to BMI at lower levels of such activity. The OR for those who were least active, had the highest energy intake, and the highest BMI was 3.4 (95% CI = 2.1-5.4) compared with the opposite extreme. The association was explained solely by the findings for men, in whom the OR for a comparison of the extremes was 7.2 (95% CI = 3.4-5.2); there was little association in women (43). Waist-to-hip ratio was associated with increased risk in men (44) but not in women (45).
Overall, the evidence suggests that obesity may increase the risk of colon cancer (particularly in men) but, as with physical activity, obesity does not appear to influence risk of rectal cancer.
Reproduction and Exogenous Hormone Use
In 1969, Fraumeni et al. (46) noted that nuns experienced an excess not only of known hormone-associated cancers but also of colon cancer. Several case-control studies in the 1970s noted, but did not explain, a higher risk of colon cancer among nulliparous women. In 1980, we (5) presented a hypothesis (based on these studies, on the known sex differences in colon cancer incidence, on international changes in fertility, and on animal data) that higher parity, early age at first birth, and use of oral contraceptives would each be associated with a reduced risk of colon cancer, largely as a result of changes in lipids and bile acids that occur with changes in the hormonal milieu. There is now an additional hypothesis to explain the role of hormones in colon cancer (47,48), which will be discussed later in the section entitled "Somatic and Genetic Changes and MechanismsIntegrating the Data."
More than 20 epidemiologic studies have reported on reproduction and colon cancer. Overall, it appears that age at first birth is not associated with colon cancer risk; the conservative interpretation of the parity data is similar, especially given that all the cohort studies show no association; see reference (15) for original citations and greater detail. Nevertheless, the differences between the findings of the cohort and population-based, case-control studies remain to be explained, as does the role of age at clinical presentation (37).
The first investigation of a relationship between hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and colorectal cancer risk was published in 1981 by Weiss et al. (49), who reported a null association with colon cancer. In 1983, we (50) reported a statistically significant lower risk of colon cancer with use of the high-estrogen oral contraceptives then available and a marginally (and nonsignificantly) decreased risk (OR = 0.8; 95% CI = 0.4-1.5) with non-oral contraceptive hormone use. Since that time, there have been 15 other studies (45,51-64). Findings among these studies are not entirely consistent; among the 12 that focused on colon cancer or provided separate data on colon cancer, seven studies (57,58,60-64) showed statistically significant lower risk with HRT or a less well specified hormone variable, two studies (45,50) showed nonsignificantly lower risks, two studies (55,59) were null, and one study (56) showed elevated risks among users.
The papers by Newcomb and Storer (62) and Kampman et al. (63) provide typical findings. Consistent with other recent observations, these papers reported an approximate halving of risk with recent HRT use. This degree of risk reduction was maintained for about 10 years after cessation of use. Data on duration of use suggest that longer use is associated with lower risk. We have shown (48), as have others (65,66), that a similar pattern of association exists between HRT and risk for adenomatous polyps of both the colon and the rectum.
Family History
Individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer are themselves at increased risk, not only as a result of the rare high-risk syndromes (10,12) but also more generally in the population, with a risk approximately twofold that of individuals without a family history of colorectal cancer (9,67-71). For a discussion of known genetic syndromes with a markedly elevated risk of colorectal cancer, see the section below entitled "Genetic PredispositionInherited Syndromes." Inherited enzyme polymorphisms may also carry an excess risksee "Genetic PredispositionHigh-Prevalence Polymorphisms"but probably do not contribute to a positive family history (Slattery ML, Edwards SL, Samowitz W, Potter JD: manuscript submitted for publication).
Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)
NSAIDs, including aspirin, have been consistently associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer. At least seven case-control studies of aspirin (72-78) have shown a lower risk of colorectal cancer; four cohort studies have reported lower risk (79-81) or lower mortality (82). An inverse association with adenomatous polyps was also seen with regular aspirin use (74,80,83,84). Sulindac was reported to induce regression of adenomas in patients with FAP (85). In minor contrast, one cohort study (86) and one low-dose aspirin intervention study, analyzed both as an intervention trial (87) and at later follow-up (88), showed null results. In rodents, aspirin (89), indomethacin (90,91), sulindac (92), piroxicam (93), and celecoxib (a specific cyclooxygenase-2 [COX-2] inhibitor) (94) inhibited carcinogenesis.
Smoking
Smoking cigarettes has not often been associated with an elevated risk of colorectal cancer, although greater risk associated with smoking cigars and pipes has been described (95,96). Several studies (97-100), however, have noted a higher risk for colon cancer among cigarette smokers, especially among those with very long smoking histories. Furthermore, essentially every study that has examined the association between cigarette smoking and adenomatous polyps has reported an elevated risk (97,98,101-113). Most recently, interest has focused on the possibility that risk associated with smoking is modified by polymorphisms in metabolizing enzymes (see section below entitled "Genetic PredispositionHigh-Prevalence Polymorphisms").
Alcohol
In 1957, Stocks (114) first reported a marginally elevated risk of colorectal cancer among daily beer drinkers compared with abstainers. Subsequently, this association with cancers of the large bowel has been explored in many other studies. See references (14,15) for original citations.
Six cohort studies of alcoholics have compared their cancer mortality experience with the cancer mortality experience of the appropriate general population. None of these studies found statistically significant elevations in colon or rectal cancer mortality. Five general population cohort studies have reported on colon cancer; four showed statistically significant associations with alcohol consumption, as did each of the three that explored rectal cancer risk and two of the three studies that reported on colorectal cancer. Eighteen case-control studies have examined alcohol consumption and colon cancer; alcohol consumption was associated with increased risk in nine. Nine of 17 studies of rectal cancer reported similarly elevated risks.
Studies of both colon and rectal cancers have shown a more consistently elevated risk among men than among women, perhaps because of the generally lower consumption of alcohol among women. There is no strong evidence to suggest that one source of alcohol (e.g., beer) is more associated with risk than alcohol as a whole. Indeed, the WCRF report (14) concluded, "high alcohol consumption probably increases the risk of cancers of the colon and rectum" and the association is likely to be "related to total ethanol intake, irrespective of the type of drink." As already noted, there are studies showing both increased risks and no association, but there are essentially no studies that show a reduced risk with higher intake. The inconsistencies may be the consequence of small sample sizes; of differences in control groups, study methods, or preferred beverages between the sexes and across countries; or, possibly, of population differences in susceptibility to, and metabolism of, alcohol.
![]() |
GENETIC PREDISPOSITIONINHERITED SYNDROMES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
FAP is a rare autosomal dominant syndrome (10) caused by an inherited mutation in the APC gene. Localization of the gene was independently accomplished in 1987 by Leppert et al. (115) and Bodmer et al. (116); the gene was mapped to chromosome 5q and subsequently cloned and sequenced (117). The population frequency of truncated forms of APC has been estimated at one in 10 000, and lifetime penetrance was, until recently, thought to approach 100%. In the mouse, however, there is clear evidence of modification of penetrance by other genes (see below); it remains to be established whether this is true in humans. The disease is characterized by the development, sometimes from childhood, of multiple colorectal adenomas, numbering from a few polyps to several thousand. There are also extracolonic manifestations. Left untreated, one or more of the polyps will progress to cancer at a mean age of 44 yearsapproximately 20 years earlier than the appearance of cancers among unaffected individuals. The mutations described so far in FAP families are at different sites within APC, but almost all lead to stop codons and thus a truncated APC protein (118,119). A nontruncating polymorphism of APC has been shown to be more prevalent among the Ashkenazim and to carry a modestly elevated risk of colorectal cancer (120). Mutations at the APC locus are a common and early somatic event in polyps and cancer (121); i.e., for some individuals the first hit is the germline mutation, whereas for others it is a somatic event. APC can also be silenced by hypermethylation (122).
There are several variants of FAP. They include the following: Gardner's syndrome, in which specific extracolonic manifestations are expressed, e.g., osteomas, skin fibromas, and epidermoid cysts (123); Turcot's syndrome, which includes medulloblastoma (124); and the attenuated form of FAP, in which many fewer polyps are found (125). There are correlations between APC mutation sites and the variant phenotypes, e.g., attenuated FAP where the mutations are at the 5' end of the gene (126), the profuse polyposis syndrome where the inherited mutation normally occurs between codons 1285 and 1465 (127), the appearance of congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium (CHRPE) with mutations at codons 542-1309 (128), and a multiplicity of extracolonic manifestations with mutations at codons 1465, 1546, and 2621 (128). Nonetheless, the same mutation can be associated with different phenotypes, even within a single family (129).
This variation in the phenotype raises issues about other modifiersboth genes and environment. For carriers of a mutated APC, there are data to support other genetic as well as environmental influences on the phenotype. Backcrosses using the MIN (multiple intestinal neoplasia) mouse (APC+/-) provided evidence of the gene Mom-1 (modifier of min) that attenuates the phenotype (130). (Although the human homologue of the genea secretory phospholipasehas been identified, there is no clear link to the manifestation of polyps in FAP families or to colon cancer more generally.) These experiments with APC and Mom-1 were done using standard mouse genetics. More recently, three other genetic modifiers have been identified in studies using transgenics. Both DNA methyltransferase (131) and COX-2 knockouts (132) crossed with APC+/- mice show markedly attenuated phenotypes; in contrast, the cross with the Smad4 knockout shows a more severe phenotype (133). These experiments also provide some evidence for the importance of DNA methylation (which is markedly abnormal in both inherited and sporadic colon cancers and can be influenced by dietary factors, especially folate) and of the role of COX-2 (which can be inhibited by aspirin and other NSAIDs). Indeed, there is, as noted above, a large body of evidence to show that aspirin and other NSAIDs are associated with a reduced risk of sporadic colon cancer and can reduce the number of polyps in the rectum of patients with FAP.
In general, this finding suggests that, although inheriting a mutated copy of APC is associated with a highly penetrant phenotype, there are, nonetheless, both genetic and environmental influences that modify that penetrance. Even if surgery remains the only treatment for FAP patients for the foreseeable future, such findings have implications both for the management of FAP patients following colectomy (the rectum remains prone to polyp formation) and for the prevention of the sporadic disease. Some of the known functions of the APC protein will be discussed below in the section entitled "Somatic and Genetic Changes and MechanismsIntegrating the Data."
Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC)
In 1913, Warthin (134) described several different family cancer syndromes. In one of these families, family G, the initial history was almost entirely of gastric and uterine cancers. This family, particularly in the most recent generations, has a very high incidence of colorectal cancers and is archetypical of HNPCC families.
HNPCC is an inherited autosomal dominant syndrome (135), with a
much less well defined phenotype than FAP, not easily distinguished from
"sporadic" polyposis and cancer on physical examination (there is no tendency to
extensive polyposis). Although there were initial claims that it accounts for about 15% of
colorectal cancer cases, recent studies (136,137) suggest that this
proportion may be around 2% or less. The most clearly distinguishing features of the
family history are the tendency to early onset and a pattern of other cancersparticularly
those involving the endometrium, urinary tract, stomach, and biliary system (138). There have been several attempts to provide a sensitive and specific definition of
the syndrome. The Amsterdam criteria (139) (Table 1) are, on the basis of molecular diagnosis, overly restrictive. A National Cancer
Institute workshop (140) expanded these clinical criteria (Bethesda
criteria; Table 1
). The clinically defined history can be confirmed by
examining the tumor for microsatellite instability or by testing for germline mutations in a family
of genes that are involved in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) (see below). Microsatellite
instability, while common in HNPCC tumors, is nonetheless neither sensitive nor specific. It is
unclear whether survival of HNPCC patients is better than (141) or
essentially similar to (142) that of patients with sporadic tumors.
|
The loss of MMR has several consequences, most crucially loss of proofreading and correction of small deletions and insertions (153). Furthermore, colorectal cell lines deficient in MMR show generally higher accumulation of other mutations and deletions (154). As with the other major gene APC, somatic mutation (155) or hypermethylation (156,157) of MMR genes is also a pathway to colorectal cancer.
The steps in the molecular pathogenesis of colorectal cancer that involve either germline or somatic silencing of APC or MMR genes will be discussed in the section below entitled "Somatic and Genetic Changes and MechanismsIntegrating the Data."
![]() |
GENETIC PREDISPOSITIONHIGH-PREVALENCE POLYMORPHISMS |
---|
Meat consumption is associated with increased risk of cancer, and perhaps this is particularly true of heavily cooked meat. Heterocyclic amines may be colorectal carcinogens. Together, these observations provoked the question as to whether the metabolism of heterocyclic amines, which may be altered by genetic variability of at least three relevant enzymes (NAT1, NAT2, and CYP1A2) might influence the risk of colorectal neoplasia (158,159). The evidence is somewhat mixed, with the earlier small studies suggesting that the genetic polymorphisms themselves (160) may be associated with risk or that there may be an interaction with meat consumption (161). Not all of the mechanisms and genetic data are consistent (162). The larger and more recent studies do not support an independent role for NAT2 with cancer (163-166) or polyps (113,167) and, although suggestive of an interaction with meat or tobacco smoke (163,164), are not consistent (113,166). Results for NAT1 are also not consistent and suggest that there is no independent association with genotype (163,168-170). Combinations of rapid NAT1, NAT2, and perhaps CYP1A2 genotypes may be associated with elevated risk in the presence of tobacco smoking or high intake of meat (163). One important problem is that, although CYP1A2 is phenotypically variable, the locus of the genetic variation remains to be identified.
Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (MTHFR)
Vegetables are associated with a decreased risk of colorectal neoplasia. One of the postulated mechanisms is that folate, central to methyl-group metabolism, may influence both methylation of DNA and the available nucleotide pool for DNA replication and repair. As noted above, there is some evidence, albeit inconsistent, that folate and vitamin B12 (a cofactor in this pathway) are associated with a reduced risk of colorectal neoplasia (28-31). There is a growing body of evidence to suggest that MTHFR, a polymorphic enzyme, influences that association such that those at highest risk for both adenomas and cancer have the variant (TT) genotype and low intakes of folate and vitamin B12 [(171,172); Ulrich CM, Kampman E, Bigler J, Schwartz SM, Chen C, Bostick R, et al.: manuscript submitted for publication].
Nonetheless, the complete story is more complex than initially thought because those with the variant (TT) genotype in the presence of an adequate folate and B12 intake have, if anything, a somewhat reduced risk of colorectal neoplasia [(171); Ulrich CM, Kampman E, Bigler J, Schwartz SM, Chen C, Bostick R, et al.: manuscript submitted for publication]. Perhaps the fact that MTHFR is at the "crossroads" between methyl-group transfer and the manufacture of nucleotides ensures that risk of carcinogenesis increases only when both a deficiency of folate and a variant genotype are present (Ulrich CM, Kampman E, Bigler J, Schwartz SM, Chen C, Bostick L, et al.: manuscript submitted for publication). This combination results in limited transfer of methyl groups as well as abnormalities of DNA repair, including uracil misincorporation. Conversely, under conditions characterized by high intakes of folate/B12, among individuals with a variant genotype, methionine synthase functions at full capacity and effectively utilizes the 5-methyltetrahydrofolate that is the product of MTHFR, thus resulting in adequate quantities of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), an increased pool of 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate, and enhanced nucleotide production. The overall result is plausibly a decreased risk of colonic neoplasia (Ulrich CM, Kampman E, Bigler J, Schwartz SM, Chen C, Bostick R, et al. manuscript submitted for publication). The final complexity arises because both general hypomethylation of DNA and hypermethylation of specific gene promoter regions are characteristics of colorectal cancer (see below).
![]() |
SOMATIC AND GENETIC CHANGES AND MECHANISMSINTEGRATING THE DATA |
---|
The microarchitecture of the colon is characterized by crypts that are approximately 50 cells deep. In the small bowel, crypts and villi provide a very large surface area for nutrient absorption. In contrast, there is no need for a large surface area in the large bowel where little other than water is reabsorbed. Other pressures almost certainly account for the evolutionary persistence of colonic crypts. The most likely explanation is protection of the crypt progenitor cells from the very mutagenic environment of the colonic lumen. The structure of the crypt and the dynamics of cell replication ensure that, under normal circumstances, both the crypt stem cells and the immediate daughter cells replicate in the lowest one third, giving rise as they divide and then migrate to all cells that line the crypt (173). This location, coupled with the generally outward/upward pressures exerted by secreted mucus, ensures that interaction between colonic contents and replicating cells is essentially nonexistent. By the time that normal crypt cells reach the surface, they are not replicating, are differentiated, and may be beginning to undergo apoptosis (i.e., programmed cell death). Therefore, any mutagenic events in these cells have essentially no impact on the integrity of the crypt cell population.
This pattern of events has two consequences. First, in order that there is a population of
mutated cells that subsequently gives rise to an adenoma, a stem (or very early daughter) cell
must undergo the first hit. This first hit, because of the microarchitecture, is most plausibly
blood-borne rather than luminal. A mutation in a progenitor cell means that there is a replicating
population of cells with an abnormal phenotype, thus increasing the odds that one will undergo a
second hit. The second probable consequence of the microarchitecture is that, in order for the
colonic contents to play a role in colon carcinogenesis, there must be replicating abnormal cells
either protruding into the lumen, i.e., a polyp, or at least in potential contact with the fecal
stream, i.e., a microadenoma. It is now known that a single hit, namely, a mutation in APC, creates all the conditionsabnormalities of adhesion, migration, and
replicationto grow a polyp (see below). Fig. 1
illustrates the relevant steps.
|
The above seems, at first glance, little better than a description of already established events with no predictive power in the absence of an organotypic model. What makes it more plausible is that, in ulcerative colitis, which carries an approximate 20-fold elevated risk of cancer, APC mutations are found in fewer than 10% of cases. Instead, the early event appears to be a p53 mutation (177). In ulcerative colitis, there is no need to grow a polyp in order to provide a target for multiple hits; because of the destruction of the epithelium, the colonic contents are readily able to interact with proliferating stem and early daughter cells and provide the first hit. What appears necessary for the development of cancer from ulcerative colitis dysplasia is a loss of a cell cycle checkpoint.
A germline mutation of APC represents one kind of field defecta widespread inherited predisposition to malignant change. Ulcerative colitis, particularly pancolitis, represents another. It may be that individuals without such inherited or acquired abnormalities nonetheless have, as a result of other inherited susceptibilities or of prolonged exposure to specific agents or a growth-promoting metabolic milieu, a similar kind of defect resulting in an increased tendency to polyp formation or dysplasia. The presence of such a genetic or acquired field defect has not been demonstrated but does hold promise for early detection.
Pathways to Colorectal Cancer
The evidence suggests that there are at least four pathways from
normal cell to colorectal cancer. However, some of the molecular
machinery appears to be common (Fig. 2).
|
|
On the basis of the allelotypes of a series of tumors, Vogelstein and colleagues (188-192) showed that the molecular steps after the activation of the APC-ß-catenin-Tcf pathway involve an accumulating (but not linear) series of specific chromosomal and genetic changes that accompany the transition from normal colonic mucosa to metastatic carcinoma. These include mutation of K-ras (a proto-oncogene), changes in methylation patterns, and mutation or loss of p53 (a tumor suppressor gene controlling entry into the cell cycle). Other important losses include DPC4/Smad4(193) or possibly DCC(191) on chromosome 18 and the Peutz-Jeghers gene (194-196) on chromosome 19.
Following the identification of the HNPCC genes as being DNA MMR genes, it was postulated that these mutations might make mutations of APC, K-ras, p53, etc., more likely. It has since become clear that other genes are damaged or lost in HNPCCparticularly the transforming growth factor (TGF) ß receptor II gene (TGFßRII) (in a growth-controlling pathway) (197), BAX (apoptosis) (198), and even the MMR genes themselves (154). Indeed, there is some evidence (199-203), although not entirely consistent (144,204), that mutations of K-ras, p53, and APC are less common in HNPCC and in sporadic tumors with microsatellite instability. Certainly, the mutational spectrum of APC is different between the two pathways (204). The signaling pathway from TGFß proceeds via Smad transcription factors; loss of Smad4/Dpc4 is a common event in sporadic tumors (193) and has been shown to exacerbate the APC mutant phenotype in mice (133).
In the absence of an inherited APC mutation, the likelihood of developing an adenoma in an individual with a DNA MMR defect may not be greatly different from that in the general population. However, once an adenoma develops, its progression to carcinoma is more rapid in the individual with a DNA MMR defect as the colonic environment induces irreparable damage. Evidence of the importance of the environment and of the quantitatively (rather than of the qualitatively) different risk in HNPCC patients compared with the general population comes from the comparison of the tissue distribution of HNPCC tumors in Warthin's family G at the turn of the century (134) and in the subsequent follow-up (205). Initially, over three generations, the family showed five stomach cancers, 10 uterine cancers, and only two, perhaps three, "intestine" cancers (134). When Lynch et al. (205) described the family in 1981, there were then 10 or 11 colorectal cancers in the third generation (plus 15 endometrial cancers and two stomach cancers) and 23 colorectal cancers in the fourth generation (plus two endometrial cancers and one stomach cancer). This observation shows that the distribution of the disease in an HNPCC family essentially exaggerates the pattern seen over this century in the general population: stomach cancer more common around 1900 and subsequently declining, endometrial cancer more common later but now less so, and a recent higher risk of colorectal cancer.
It is possible to lose DNA MMR function not by somatic mutation but by hypermethylation. Hypermethylation of hMLH1 now appears to be a very early event in many sporadic colorectal tumors (156,206), an epigenetic event that leads, in turn, to a mutator phenotype. The cause of the hypermethylation silencing has yet to be determined; speculation surrounds the possibility that there is a rapid switch of methylation patterns affecting whole regions of the genome, perhaps implicating a still earlier mutation in a gene that controls large-scale chromosome integrity (207). Evidence that this methylation switch involves more than the loss of MMR comes from studies showing that there is a similar silencing of p16ink4A, TSP-1, and IGF2 (207,208).
Thus, the initial hit is an inherited or acquired mutation in an MMR gene or
hypermethylation specifically of hMLH1. At the heart of this pathway is the probability
that there will now be a vicious cycle of increasing microsatellite instability involving the MMR
genes themselves and additional losses of important controllers of DNA and cell integrity (Fig. 2, B).
The third pathway to colorectal cancer is via ulcerative colitis (209)
(Fig. 2, C). Although this disease is a minor contributor to the overall
population burden of colorectal cancer, individuals with ulcerative colitis have about a 20-fold
excess risk. This pathway appears to involve a dysplasia-carcinoma sequence, more like
Barrett's esophagus or stomach cancer. As noted earlier, there is no "need"
to grow a polyp. The somatic molecular changes are much less well defined, but APC
mutations are uncommon and p53 loss can occur early, appearing even in diploid
histologically normal tissue (178). Microsatellite instability may occur in
the absence of DNA MMR defectsagain, even in normal-appearing tissue (210)suggesting perhaps an overwhelming source of mutagenic activity
consequent upon the exposure of proliferating cells to the colonic contents.
Fourth, there is evidence to show that almost all colon cancers arise from cells in which the
estrogen receptor (ER) gene has been silenced (47) (Fig. 2, D). Unlike the switched methylation silencing of MLH1 and p16,
hypermethylation of ER is an age-related phenomenon; there are also other genes that
show hypermethylation with age. It is not known whether this is an early crucial step; moreover,
it is not established why loss of the ER protein is so critical to colonic epithelial
cellswhat estrogen-responsive genes are downstream?
Finally, loss of a mitotic checkpoint may be important. One of the characteristics of many colorectal tumors is a marked degree of chromosomal instabilityobvious as widespread aneuploidy. It has recently been demonstrated (211) that this chromosomal instability is consistently associated with loss of function of a mitotic checkpoint. Furthermore, in at least some cases, the checkpoint was lost because of mutational inactivation of the human homologue of BUB1. In yeast, BUB1 is part of the chromosomal segregation machinery. Aneuploidy may be important because it increases the loss of other tumor suppressor genes. Certainly, it adds weight to the evidence that a heightened degree of mutability of the genome is a characteristic of human tumors (212). How this particular step interacts with other pathways to colorectal cancer is not yet established, but a transfected mutant hBUB1 induced loss of the mitotic checkpoint in cells that were euploid but showed microsatellite instability (211).
Where Do the Environmental Influences Interact With the Molecular Pathways?
Some of the "targets" in the molecular pathway to colon cancer are now clearthe APC-ß-catenin-Tcf pathway, DNA MMR genes, p53, H-ras, ER, and perhaps hBUB1. Loss of these controls can be via small mutations, by CpG island hypermethylation, by large-scale losses of genomic material that itself can be facilitated by loss of some of these genes, and perhaps by extensive switched hypermethylation. It seems likely that some of these processes are secondary to events associated with selection for autonomous cells; this is almost certainly true of the large-scale genomic losses characteristic of the later stages of most cancers. However, smaller scale changes are more probably the consequence of changes in the microenvironment of the DNA and the cell, and these, in turn, may be influenced by diet, smoking, exercise, HRT use, etc.
One view is that ingested foods and host responses primarily determine and condition the
"growth media" (213)both tissue side and luminal
sidein which the colonic cells are bathed. Risk factors may operate through a variety of
physiologic cascades (213,214). For example, on the tissue side of
colonic cells, not only is there exposure to meat- and smoking-derived carcinogens and
vegetable-derived anticarcinogens, but also there is the likelihood that crosstalk exists between
fibroblasts and epithelial cells; this crosstalk may be particularly mediated by endogenous growth
factors. On the luminal sidein the presence of a growing
microadenoma/adenomaingested vegetables will increase the fiber content, which is
fermentable by gut bacteria, thus producing volatile fatty acids. This result, in turn, influences
cell replication, cell maturation, and apoptosis. Meanwhile, fiber and the higher bacterial mass
increase stool bulk and reduce transit timeas does physical activity. Bioactive
compounds, widespread in vegetables, may also influence growth of abnormal cells, directly or
via metabolites. Some plausible interactions, summarized in Table 3, are
listed below.
|
Fiber ferments in the large bowel to produce short-chain fatty acids. Butyrate is an important colonic fuel and induces apoptosis in colonic cell lines (222).
More generally, vegetables contain a large number of substancesboth micronutrients, such as carotenoids and ascorbate with antioxidant activity, and other bioactive compounds, such as phenols, flavonoids, isothiocyanates, and indoles with a variety of potent anticarcinogenic properties (27,223). There are no data to show that any bioactive compound influences DNA repair; however, at many of the steps from initial exposure to a procarcinogen to the appearance of cancer, one or more known phytochemicals can alter the likelihood of carcinogenesis, usually in a favorable direction. The antioxidant compounds may be particularly important in ulcerative colitis-associated carcinogenesis, given the extensive flux of oxidation in the lumen.
Perhaps the most important observation, from a public health perspective, is the evidence that higher intake of plant foods is tightly linked to lower risks of almost all epithelial cancers. The public health recommendations that follow are obvious but far from being implemented (14). Nonetheless, there is still a great deal to learn about mechanisms, not just to satisfy intellectual curiosity but also to provide insights into molecular pathways and thus into other possible approaches to risk reduction, especially among high-risk individuals. The best research strategy is likely to involve human experimental nutrition"feeding studies"using molecular tools to monitor the intermediate biology.
Meat and heterocyclic amines. Pursuing the argument that blood-borne carcinogens may well produce somatic mutations in APC and perhaps K-ras, important sources of known carcinogens with established links to risks to colorectal cancer include cooked meat (e.g., heterocyclic amines and nitrosamines). Sugimura and Sato (224) originally proposed that specific heterocyclic amines are important in the etiology of colon cancer. Several separate classes of these compounds have been identified (225) and have been shown to be carcinogenic in animals (226,227), including having a direct effect on APC (227). Nitrosamines are also plausible human colon carcinogens, the levels of which are related to dietary intake of meat (228). An elevated risk may be exacerbated by genetically determined variations in relevant metabolic pathways but, as noted above, to date, the larger studies are less impressive.
The next research steps probably involve establishing all of the polymorphisms in the metabolizing enzymes involved in handling heterocyclic amines, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), nitrosamines, etc. Until this task is completed and the results are applied to studies of populations with well-measured intakes of meat, across a broad range of consumption and cooking practices, there will be tantalizing findings implicating, then not implicating, meat and showing intermittent interactions with metabolic profiles. The ideal population will include a sizable proportion of vegetarians, for the same reason that we include nonsmokers in studies of tobacco. The public health recommendation appears clearboth for coronary heart disease and cancer: "If eaten at all, limit intake of red meat to less than 3 ounces daily" (14). In the United States, this recommendation is likely also to have a beneficial ecologic impact.
NSAIDs. NSAIDs clearly suppress COX-2 (229) and are capable of inhibiting polyp growth even in individuals with FAP. COX-2 inhibition produces effects on epithelial proliferation and apoptosis (230) and on angiogenesis (231). Most recently, there is evidence that NSAIDs (including aspirin) may directly suppress the HNPCC-associated mutator phenotype by genetic selection for a subset of cells that do not express microsatellite instability (232). These agents show considerable promise for protecting even those at high genetically influenced risk. Clinical trials to establish their efficacy more generally are under way.
Smoking. Tobacco smoke is a major source of a wide variety of carcinogensincluding heterocyclic amines, polycyclic hydrocarbons, and nitrosamines. These are plausible blood-borne carcinogens and the, as yet incomplete, evidence that there are interactions between smoking and metabolic genotype reinforces the importance of this exposure. There is evidence from rat models that APC is a target for heterocyclic amines, but whether this is true in humans remains to be shown (227). Many of the same questions about the carcinogens in meat and their genetically variable metabolism (see above) apply to those in tobacco smoke.
Alcohol. A local action of ethanol on tissue has been proposed through a solvent or cytotoxic effect, perhaps more relevant in the upper alimentary tract. Acetaldehyde is a potent adduct former, and alcohol is known to inhibit DNA repair (233). Alcohol may exert its effect through associated deficiencies in nutrients, particularly folate (29,234). As is true for understanding the role of plant foods in colorectal cancer, feeding studies with alcohol, in which both molecular and physiologic responses are monitored, are an important next step.
HRT. The evidence that ER hypermethylation increases with age and is a central feature of colon cancer suggests that perhaps declining levels of estrogen may be important. The inverse relationship between HRT and both polyps and cancer may be a consequence of replacing the declining endogenous estrogen levels and thus reducing the likelihood that the ER gene will be silenced by methylation (235). Identifying the estrogen-responsive targets that are involved in colorectal carcinogenesis constitutes an important research question.
Physical activity and obesity. One hypothesis for the role of physical activity is that it stimulates colon peristalsis, thereby decreasing the time that colonic contents are in contact with the epithelium; however, transit time is not a well-established risk factor for colon neoplasia. Exercise has both acute and chronic hormonal effects and favorable effects on the immune system (15). Furthermore, higher physical activity, especially in the presence of lower body mass, is associated with a general metabolic milieu (lower insulin, glucose, and triacylglycerol levels and possibly lower levels of other growth factors) that is less favorable to the growth of cancer in general and perhaps colon cancer in particular (236).
This last point raises the more general issue of how various specific exposures and behaviors might jointly influence risk of colorectal cancer. After all, many of the risk factors tend to cluster in the lives of individuals and populations: physical inactivity, obesity, high consumption of meat, alcohol and tobacco use, and low intake of plant foods. Various subsets of this list are implicated as causal in a variety of metabolic disorders: diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemias, and hypertension. These, in turn, are themselves associated with defined disease outcomes. It is not difficult to hypothesize from a variety of perspectives [sex differences in lipid and bile acid metabolism (5,237), Syndrome X (236), and hyperinsulinemia and diabetes mellitus (238)] that large-bowel cancer is really one more metabolic disorder induced by energy imbalance. The phenotypic manifestations (ischemic heart disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, Syndrome X, and colon cancer) will be determined by underlying genotype plus the subtle variation in the pattern of excesses. From a research perspective, there are a variety of leads that allow us to begin to characterize the metabolic genotypes that shape the phenotypes: genes involved in lipid metabolism, in appetite regulation, in diabetes predisposition, and in pathways to obesity. From a public health perspective, however, the protective steps are already clear: Maintain regular physical activity and normal body weight (14). How to do so in a sea of stimuli designed to achieve exactly the opposite goal is a bizarre conundrum that we have inflicted on ourselves and increasingly on others.
![]() |
CONCLUSION |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
1 American Cancer Society (ACS). Cancer facts and figures1997. Atlanta (GA): ACS; 1997.
2 World Health Organization (WHO). The world health report. Geneva (Switzerland): WHO; 1997.
3 Parkin DM, Muir CS, Whelan SL, Gao JT, Ferlay J, Powell J. Cancer incidence in five continents. Lyon (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1992.
4 Muir C, Waterhouse J, Mack T, Powell J, Whelan S, Smans M, et al. Cancer incidence in five continents. Lyon (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1987.
5 McMichael AJ, Potter JD. Reproduction, endogenous and exogenous sex hormones, and colon cancer: a review and hypothesis. J Natl Cancer Inst 1980;65:1201-7.[Medline]
6 Ries LA, Hankey BF, Edwards BK. Cancer statistics review 1973-87. Bethesda (MD): National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 1990 Report No.: DHHS Publ No. (NIH)90-2789.
7 McMichael AJ, Giles GG. Cancer in migrants to Australia: extending the descriptive epidemiological data. Cancer Res 1988;48:751-6.[Abstract]
8 Haenszel W. Cancer mortality among the foreign born in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 1961;26:37-132.
9 Macklin M. Inheritance of cancer of the stomach and large intestine. J Natl Cancer Inst 1960;24:551-71.
10 Veale AM. Intestinal polyposis. Cambridge (U.K.): Cambridge University Press; 1965.
11 Utsunomiya J, Lynch HT. Hereditary colorectal cancer. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag; 1990.
12 Gardner EJ. A genetic and clinical study of intestinal polyposis, a predisposing factor for carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Am J Hum Genet 1951;3:167-76.
13 Willett WC. Dietary epidemiology. Oxford (U.K.): Oxford University Press; 1990.
14 World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) Panel (Potter JD, Chair). Diet, nutrition, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. Washington (DC): WCRF/American Institute of Cancer Research; 1997.
15 Potter JD, Slattery ML, Bostick RM, Gapstur SM. Colon cancer: a review of the epidemiology. Epidemiol Rev 1993;15:499-545.[Medline]
16 Steinmetz KA, Potter JD. Vegetables, fruit and cancer prevention: a review. J Am Diet Assoc 1996;96:1027-39.[Medline]
17 Hill AB. The environment and disease: association or causation? Proc R Soc Med 1965;58:295-300.[Medline]
18 Singh PN, Fraser GE. Dietary risk factors for colon cancer in a low-risk population. Am J Epidemiol 1998;148:761-74.[Abstract]
19 Giovannucci E, Stampfer MJ, Colditz G, Rimm EB, Willett WC. Relationship of diet to risk of colorectal adenoma in men. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992;84:91-8.[Abstract]
20 Trock B, Lanza E, Greenwald P. Dietary fiber, vegetables, and colon cancer: critical review and meta-analyses of the epidemiologic evidence. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990;82:650-61.[Abstract]
21 Burkitt DP. Related diseaserelated cause? Lancet 1969;2:1229-31.[Medline]
22
Fuchs CS, Giovannucci EL, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ, Stampfer
MJ, Rosner B, et al. Dietary fiber and risk of colorectal cancer and adenoma in women. N
Engl J Med 1999;340:169-76.
23 Howe GR, Benito E, Castellato R, Cornee J, Esteve J, Gallagher RP, et al. Dietary intake of fiber and decreased risk of cancers of the colon and rectum: evidence from the combined analysis of 13 case-control studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992;84:1887-96.[Abstract]
24 DeCosse JJ, Miller HH, Lesser ML. Effect of wheat fiber and vitamins C and E on rectal polyps in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. J Natl Cancer Inst 1989;81:1290-7.[Abstract]
25 MacLennan R, Macrae F, Bain C, Battistutta D, Chapuis P, Gratten H, et al. Randomized trial of intake of fat, fiber, and beta carotene to prevent colorectal adenomas. The Australian Polyp Prevention Project. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:1760-6.[Abstract]
26 Potter JD. Fiber and colorectal cancerwhere to now? N Engl J Med. In press 1999.
27 Steinmetz KA, Potter JD. Vegetables, fruit, and cancer. II. Mechanisms. Cancer Causes Control 1991;2:427-42.[Medline]
28 Freudenheim JL, Graham S, Marshall JR, Haughey BP, Cholewinski S, Wilkinson G. Folate intake and carcinogenesis of the colon and rectum. Int J Epidemiol 1991;20:368-74.[Abstract]
29 Giovannucci E, Rimm EB, Ascherio A, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC. Alcohol, low-methionine-low-folate diets and risk of colon cancer in men. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:265-73.[Abstract]
30 Giovannucci E, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Rimm EB, Trichopoulos D, Rosner BA, et al. Folate, methionine, and alcohol intake and risk of colorectal adenoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:875-84.[Abstract]
31 Slattery ML, Schaffer D, Edwards SL, Ma KN, Potter JD. Are dietary factors involved in DNA methylation associated with colon cancer? Nutr Cancer 1997;28:52-62.[Medline]
32 Kato I, Akhmedkhanov A, Koenig K, Toniolo PG, Shore RE, Riboli E. Prospective study of diet and female colorectal cancer: the New York University Women's Health Study. Nutr Cancer 1997;28:276-81.[Medline]
33 Key T, Fraser G, Thorogood M, Appleby P, Beral V, Reeves G, et al. Mortality in vegetarians and non-vegetarians: a collaborative analysis of 8300 deaths among 76,000 men and women in five prospective studies. Public Health Nutr 1998;1:33-41.[Medline]
34 Gerhardsson de Verdier M, Hagman U, Peters RK, Steineck G, Overvik E. Meat, cooking methods and colorectal cancer: a case-referent study in Stockholm. Int J Cancer 1991;49:520-5.[Medline]
35 Schiffman MH, Felton JS. Re: "Fried foods and risk of colon cancer" [letter]. Am J Epidemiol 1990;131:376-8.[Medline]
36 Probst-Hensch NM, Sinha R, Longnecker MP, Witte JS, Ingles SA, Frankl HD, et al. Meat preparation and colorectal adenomas in a large sigmoidoscopy-based case-control study in California (United States). Cancer Causes Control 1997;8:175-83.[Medline]
37 Slattery ML, Potter JD, Sorenson AW. Age and risk factors for colon cancer (United States and Australia): are there implications for understanding differences in case-control and cohort studies? Cancer Causes Control 1994;5:557-63.[Medline]
38 Howe GR, Aronson KJ, Benito E, Castelleto R, Cornee J, Duffy S, et al. The relationship between dietary fat intake and risk of colorectal cancer: evidence from the combined analysis of 13 case-control studies. Cancer Causes Control 1997;8:215-28.[Medline]
39 Giovannucci E, Goldin B. The role of fat, fatty acids, and total energy intake in the etiology of human colon cancer. Am J Clin Nutr 1997;66 (6 Suppl):S1564-S1571.
40 Bostick RM, Fosdick L, Wood JR, Grambsch P, Grandits GA, Lillemoe TJ, et al. Calcium and colorectal epithelial cell proliferation in sporadic adenoma patients: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:1307-15.[Abstract]
41 Hyman J, Baron JA, Dain BJ, Sandler RS, Haile RW, Mandel JS, et al. Dietary and supplemental calcium and the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1998;7:291-5.[Abstract]
42
Baron JA, Beach M, Mandel JS, van Stolk RU, Haile RW,
Sandler RS, et al. Calcium supplements for the prevention of colorectal adenomas. Calcium
Polyp Prevention Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999;340:101-7.
43 Slattery ML, Potter J, Caan B, Edwards S, Coates A, Ma KN, et al. Energy balance and colon cancerbeyond physical activity. Cancer Res 1997;57:75-80.[Abstract]
44
Giovannucci E, Ascherio A, Rimm EB, Colditz GA, Stampfer
MJ, Willett WC. Physical activity, obesity, and risk for colon cancer and adenoma in men. Ann Intern Med 1995;122:327-34.
45 Bostick RM, Potter JD, Kushi LH, Sellers TA, Steinmetz KA, McKenzie DR, et al. Sugar, meat, and fat intake, and non-dietary risk factors for colon cancer incidence in Iowa women (United States). Cancer Causes Control 1994;5:38-52.[Medline]
46 Fraumeni JF Jr, Lloyd W, Smith EM, Wagoner JK. Cancer mortality among nuns: role of marital status in etiology of neoplastic disease in women. J Natl Cancer Inst 1969;42:455-68.[Medline]
47 Issa JP, Ottaviano YL, Celano P, Hamilton SR, Davidson NE, Baylin SB. Methylation of the oestrogen receptor CpG island links ageing and neoplasia in human colon. Nat Genet 1994;7:536-40.[Medline]
48 Potter JD, Bostick RM, Grandits GA, Fosdick L, Elmer P, Wood J, et al. Hormone replacement therapy is associated with lower risk of adenomatous polyps of the large bowel: the Minnesota Cancer Prevention Research Unit Case-Control Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1996;5:779-84.[Abstract]
49 Weiss NS, Daling JR, Chow WH. Incidence of cancer of the large bowel in relation to reproductive and hormonal factors. J Natl Cancer Inst 1981;67:57-60.[Medline]
50 Potter JD, McMichael AJ. Large bowel cancer in women in relation to reproductive and hormonal factors: a case-control study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1983;71:703-9.[Medline]
51 Wu AH, Paganini-Hill A, Ross RK, Henderson BE. Alcohol, physical activity and other risk factors for colorectal cancer: a prospective study. Br J Cancer 1987;55:687-94.[Medline]
52 Furner SE, Davis FG, Nelson RL, Haenszel W. A case-control study of large bowel cancer and hormone exposure in women. Cancer Res 1989;49:4936-40.[Abstract]
53 Davis FG, Furner SE, Persky V, Koch M. The influence of parity and exogenous female hormones on the risk of colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer 1989;43:587-90.[Medline]
54 Adami HO, Persson I, Hoover R, Schairer C, Bergkvist L. Risk of cancer in women receiving hormone replacement therapy. Int J Cancer 1989;44:833-9.[Medline]
55 Peters RK, Pike MC, Chang WW, Mack TM. Reproductive factors and colon cancers. Br J Cancer 1990;61:741-8.[Medline]
56 Wu-Williams AH, Lee M, Whittemore AS, Gallagher RP, Jiao DA, Zheng S, et al. Reproductive factors and colorectal cancer risk among Chinese females. Cancer Res 1991;51:2307-11.[Abstract]
57 Chute CG, Willett WC, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Baron JA, Rosner B, et al. A prospective study of body mass, height, and smoking on the risk of colorectal cancer in women. Cancer Causes Control 1991;2:117-24.[Medline]
58 Gerhardsson de Verdier M, London S. Reproductive factors, exogenous female hormones, and colorectal cancer by subsite. Cancer Causes Control 1992;3:355-60.[Medline]
59 Risch HA, Howe GR. Menopausal hormone use and colorectal cancer in Saskatchewan: a record linkage cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1995;4:21-8.[Abstract]
60 Jacobs EJ, White E, Weiss NS. Exogenous hormones, reproductive history, and colon cancer (Seattle, Washington, USA). Cancer Causes Control 1995;5:359-66.
61 Calle EE, Miracle-McMahill HL, Thun MJ, Heath CW Jr. Estrogen replacement therapy and risk of fatal colon cancer in a prospective cohort of postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:517-23.[Abstract]
62 Newcomb PA, Storer BE. Postmenopausal hormone use and risk of large bowel cancer [published erratum appears in J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:1416]. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:1067-71.[Abstract]
63 Kampman E, Potter JD, Slattery ML, Caan BJ, Edwards S. Hormone replacement therapy, reproductive history, and colon cancer: a multicenter, case-control study in the United States. Cancer Causes Control 1997;8:146-58.[Medline]
64 Fernandez E, La Vecchia C, Braga C, Talamini R, Negri E, Parazzini F, et al. Hormone replacement therapy and risk of colon and rectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1998;7:329-33.[Abstract]
65 Jacobson JS, Neugut AI, Garbowski GC, Ahsan H, Waye JD, Treat MR, et al. Reproductive risk factors for colorectal adenomatous polyps (New York City, NY, United States). Cancer Causes Control 1995;6: 513-8.[Medline]
66
Grodstein F, Martinez ME, Platz EA, Giovannucci E, Colditz
GA, Kautzky M, et al. Postmenopausal hormone use and risk of colorectal cancer and adenoma. Ann Intern Med 1998;128:705-12.
67 Woolf C. A genetic study of carcinoma of the large intestine. Am J Hum Genet 1958;10:42-7.
68 Lovett E. Family studies in cancer of the colon and rectum. Br J Surg 1976;63:13-8.[Medline]
69 Bale SJ, Chakravarti A, Strong LC. Aggregation of colon cancer in family data. Genet Epidemiol 1984;1:53-61.[Medline]
70 Burt RW, Bishop DT, Cannon LA, Doudle MA, Lee RG, Skolnick MH. Dominant inheritance of adenomatous colonic polyps and colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 1985;312:1540-4.[Abstract]
71 Carstensen B, Soll-Johanning H, Villadsen E, Sondergaard JO, Lynge E. Familial aggregation of colorectal cancer in the general population. Int J Cancer 1996;68:428-35.[Medline]
72 Kune GA, Kune S, Watson LF. Colorectal cancer risk, chronic illnesses, operations, and medications: case-control results from the Melbourne Colorectal Cancer Study. Cancer Res 1988;48:4399-404.[Abstract]
73 Rosenberg L, Palmer JR, Zauber AG, Warshauer ME, Stolley PD, Shapiro S. A hypothesis: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs reduce the incidence of large-bowel cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1991;83:355-8.[Abstract]
74 Suh O, Mettlin C, Petrelli NJ. Aspirin use, cancer, and polyps of the large bowel. Cancer 1993;72:1171-7.[Medline]
75 Peleg II, Maibach HT, Brown SH, Wilcox CM. Aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and the risk of subsequent colorectal cancer. Arch Intern Med 1994;154:394-9.[Abstract]
76 Muscat JE, Stellman SD, Wynder EL. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and colorectal cancer. Cancer 1994;74:1847-54.[Medline]
77 La Vecchia C, Negri E, Franceschi S, Conti E, Montella M, Giacosa A, et al. Aspirin and colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 1997;76:675-7.[Medline]
78 Rosenberg L, Louik C, Shapiro S. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use and reduced risk of large bowel cancer. Cancer 1998;82:2326-33.[Medline]
79 Schreinemachers DM, Everson RB. Aspirin use and lung, colon, and breast cancer incidence in a prospective study. Epidemiology 1994;5:138-46.[Medline]
80
Giovannucci E, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Ascherio
A, Willett WC. Aspirin use and the risk for colorectal cancer and adenoma in male health
professionals. Ann Intern Med 1994;121:241-6.
81
Giovannucci E, Egan KM, Hunter DJ, Stampfer MJ, Colditz
GA, Willett WC, et al. Aspirin and the risk of colorectal cancer in women. N Engl J Med 1995;333:609-14.
82 Thun MJ, Namboodiri MM, Heath CW Jr. Aspirin use and reduced risk of fatal colon cancer. N Engl J Med 1991;325:1593-6.[Abstract]
83 Greenberg ER, Baron JA, Freeman DH Jr, Mandel JS, Haile R. Reduced risk of large-bowel adenomas among aspirin users. The Polyp Prevention Study Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:912-6.[Abstract]
84 Logan RF, Little J, Hawtin PG, Hardcastle JD. Effect of aspirin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on colorectal adenomas: case-control study of subjects participating in the Nottingham faecal occult blood screening programme. BMJ 1993;307:285-9.[Medline]
85
Giardiello FM, Hamilton SR, Krush AJ, Piantadosi S, Hylind
LM, Celano P, et al. Treatment of colonic and rectal adenomas with sulindac in familial
adenomatous polyposis. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1313-6.
86 Paganini-Hill A, Chao A, Ross RK, Henderson BE. Aspirin use and chronic diseases: a cohort study of the elderly. BMJ 1989;299:1247-50.[Medline]
87 Gann PH, Manson JE, Glynn RJ, Buring JE, Hennekens CH. Low-dose aspirin and incidence of colorectal tumors in a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:1220-4.[Abstract]
88
Sturmer T, Glynn RJ, Lee IM, Manson JE, Buring JE,
Hennekens CH. Aspirin use and colorectal cancer: post-trial follow-up data from the
Physicians' Health Study. Ann Intern Med 1998;128:713-20.
89 Craven PA, DeRubertis FR. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 1992;36:2251-70.
90 Pollard M, Luckert PH. Indomethacin treatment of rats with dimethylhydrazine-induced intestinal tumors. Cancer Treat Rep 1980;64:1323-7.[Medline]
91 Narisawa T, Sato M, Tani M, Kudo T, Takahashi T, Goto A. Inhibition of development of methylnitrosourea-induced rat colon tumors by indomethacin treatment. Cancer Res 1981;41:1954-7.[Abstract]
92 Moorghen M, Ince P, Finney KJ, Sunter JP, Appleton DR, Watson AJ. A protective effect of sulindac against chemically-induced primary colonic tumours in mice. J Pathol 1988;156:341-7.[Medline]
93 Reddy BS, Maruyama H, Kelloff G. Dose-related inhibition of colon carcinogenesis by dietary piroxicam, a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug, during different stages of rat colon tumor development. Cancer Res 1987;47:5340-6.[Abstract]
94 Kawamori T, Rao CV, Seibert K, Reddy BS. Chemopreventive activity of celecoxib, a specific cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, against colon carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 1998;58:409-12.[Abstract]
95 Wynder EL, Shigematsu T. Environmental factors of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 1967;20:1520-61.[Medline]
96 Slattery ML, West DW, Robison LM, French TK, Ford MH, Schuman KL, et al. Tobacco, alcohol, coffee, and caffeine as risk factors for colon cancer in a low-risk population. Epidemiology 1990;1:141-5.[Medline]
97 Giovannucci E, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Ascherio A, Kearney J, et al. A prospective study of cigarette smoking and risk of colorectal adenoma and colorectal cancer in U.S. men. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994;86:183-91.[Abstract]
98 Giovannucci E, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Hunter D, Rosner BA, Willett WC, et al. A prospective study of cigarette smoking and risk of colorectal adenoma and colorectal cancer in U.S. women. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994;86:192-9.[Abstract]
99 Slattery ML, Potter JD, Friedman GD, Ma KN, Edwards S. Tobacco use and colon cancer [published erratum appears in Int J Cancer 1997;71:706]. Int J Cancer 1997;70:259-64.[Medline]
100 Knekt P, Hakama M, Jarvinen R, Pukkala E, Heliovaara M. Smoking and risk of colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 1998;78:136-9.[Medline]
101 Hoff G, Vatn M, Larsen S. Relationship between tobacco smoking and colorectal polyps. Scand J Gastroenterol 1987;22:13-6.[Medline]
102 Demers RY, Neale AV, Demers P, Deighton K, Scott RO, Dupuis MH, et al. Serum cholesterol and colorectal polyps. J Clin Epidemiol 1988;41:9-13.[Medline]
103 Kikendall JW, Bowen PE, Burgess MB, Magnetti C, Woodward J, Langenberg P. Cigarettes and alcohol as independent risk factors for colonic adenomas. Gastroenterology 1989;97:660-4.[Medline]
104 Kono S, Ikeda N, Yanai F, Shinchi K, Imanishi K. Alcoholic beverages and adenomatous polyps of the sigmoid colon: a study of male self-defence officials in Japan. Int J Epidemiol 1990;19:848-52.[Abstract]
105 Zahm SH, Cocco P, Blair A. Tobacco smoking as a risk factor for colon polyps. Am J Public Health 1991;81:846-9.[Abstract]
106 Monnet E, Allemand H, Farina H, Carayon P. Cigarette smoking and the risk of colorectal adenoma in men. Scand J Gastroenterol 1991;26:758-62.[Medline]
107 Cope GF, Wyatt JI, Pinder IF, Lee PN, Heatley RV, Kelleher J. Alcohol consumption in patients with colorectal adenomatous polyps. Gut 1991;32:70-2.[Abstract]
108 Honjo S, Kono S, Shinchi K, Imanishi K, Hirohata T. Cigarette smoking, alcohol use and adenomatous polyps of the sigmoid colon. Jpn J Cancer Res 1992;83:806-11.[Medline]
109 Olsen J, Kronborg O. Coffee, tobacco and alcohol as risk factors for cancer and adenoma of the large intestine. Int J Epidemiol 1993;22:398-402.[Abstract]
110 Sandler RS, Lyles CM, McAuliffe C, Woosley JT, Kupper LL. Cigarette smoking, alcohol, and the risk of colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology 1993;104:1445-51.[Medline]
111 Lee WC, Neugut AI, Garbowski GC, Forde KA, Treat MR, Waye JD, et al. Cigarettes, alcohol, coffee, and caffeine as risk factors for colorectal adenomatous polyps. Ann Epidemiol 1993;3:239-44.[Medline]
112 Martinez ME, McPherson RS, Annegers JF, Levin B. Cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption as risk factors for colorectal adenomatous polyps. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:274-9.[Abstract]
113
Potter JD, Bigler J, Fosdick L, Bostick RM, Kampman E,
Chen C, et al. Colorectal adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps: smoking and N-acetyltransferase polymorphisms. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:69-75.
114 Stocks P. Cancer incidence in North Wales and Liverpool region in relation to habits and environment. Br Emp Cancer Campaign 35th Annual Report 1957;1:127.
115 Leppert M, Dobbs M, Scrambler P, O'Connell P, Nakamura Y, Stauffer D, et al. The gene for familial polyposis coli maps to the long arm of chromosome 5. Science 1987;238:1411-3.[Medline]
116 Bodmer WF, Bailey CJ, Bodmer J, Bussey H, Ellis A, Gorman P, et al. Localization of the gene for familial adenomatous polyposis on chromosome 5. Nature 1987;328:614-6.[Medline]
117 Groden J, Thliveris A, Samowitz W, Carlson M, Gelbert L, Albertsen H, et al. Identification and characterization of the familial adenomatous polyposis coli gene. Cell 1991;66:589-600.[Medline]
118 Nishisho I, Nakamura Y, Miyoshi Y, Miki Y, Ando H, Horii A, et al. Mutations of chromosome 5q21 genes in FAP and colorectal cancer patients. Science 1991;253:665-9.[Medline]
119 Joslyn G, Carlson M, Thliveris A, Albertsen H, Gelbert L, Samowitz W, et al. Identification of deletion mutations and three new genes at the familial polyposis locus. Cell 1991;66:601-13.[Medline]
120 Laken SJ, Petersen GM, Gruber SB, Oddoux C, Ostrer H, Giardiello FM, et al. Familial colorectal cancer in Ashkenazim due to a hypermutable tract in APC. Nat Genet 1997;17:79-83.[Medline]
121 Powell SM, Zilz N, Beazer-Barclay Y, Bryan TM, Hamilton SR, Thibodeau SN, et al. APC mutations occur early during colorectal tumorigenesis. Nature 1992;359:235-7.[Medline]
122 Hiltunen MO, Alhonen L, Koistinaho J, Myohanen S, Paakkonen M, Marin S, et al. Hypermethylation of the APC (adenomatous polyposis coli) gene promoter region in human colorectal carcinoma. Int J Cancer 1997;70:644-8.[Medline]
123 Gardner EJ, Richards RC. Multiple cutaneous and subcutaneous lesions occurring simultaneously with hereditary polyposis and osteomatosis. Am J Hum Genet 1953;5:139-47.
124
Hamilton SR, Liu B, Parsons R, Papadopoulos N, Jen J,
Powell SM, et al. The molecular basis of Turcot's syndrome. N Engl J Med 1995;332:839-47.
125 Leppert M, Burt R, Hughes JP, Samowitz W, Nakamura Y, Woodward S, et al. Genetic analysis of an inherited predisposition to colon cancer in a family with a variable number of adenomatous polyps. N Engl J Med 1990;322:904-8.[Abstract]
126 Spirio L, Olschwang S, Groden J, Robertson M, Samowitz W, Joslyn G, et al. Alleles of the APC gene: an attenuated form of familial polyposis. Cell 1993;75:951-7.[Medline]
127 Gayther SA, Wells D, SenGupta SB, Chapman P, Neale K, Tsioupra K, et al. Regionally clustered APC mutations are associated with a severe phenotype and occur at high frequency in new mutation cases of adenomatous polyposis coli. Hum Mol Genet 1994;3:53-6.[Abstract]
128 Giardiello FM, Petersen GM, Piantadosi S, Gruber SB, Traboulsi EI, Offerhaus GJ, et al. APC gene mutations and extraintestinal phenotype of familial adenomatous polyposis. Gut 1997;40:521-5.[Abstract]
129 Giardiello FM, Krush AJ, Petersen GM, Booker SV, Kerr M, Tong LL, et al. Phenotypic variability of familial adenomatous polyposis in 11 unrelated families with identical APC gene mutation. Gastroenterology 1994;106:1542-7.[Medline]
130 Dietrich WF, Lander ES, Smith JS, Moser AR, Gould KA, Luongo C, et al. Genetic identification of Mom-1, a major modifier locus affecting min-induced intestinal neoplasia in the mouse. Cell 1993;75:631-9.[Medline]
131 Laird PW, Jackson-Grusby L, Fazeli A, Dickinson SL, Jung WE, Li E, et al. Suppression of intestinal neoplasia by DNA hypomethylation. Cell1995 ;81:197-205.[Medline]
132 Oshima M, Dinchuk JE, Kargman SL, Oshima H, Hancock B, Kwong E, et al. Suppression of intestinal polyposis in Apc delta716 knockout mice by inhibition of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2). Cell 1996;87:803-9.[Medline]
133 Takaku K, Oshima M, Miyoshi H, Matsui M, Seldin MF, Taketo MM. Intestinal tumorigenesis in compound mutant mice of both Dpc4 (Smad4) and Apc genes. Cell 1998;92:645-56.[Medline]
134 Warthin AS. Heredity with reference to carcinoma. Arch Intern Med 1913;12:546-55.
135 Lynch PM, Lynch HT. Colon cancer genetics. New York (NY): Van Nostrand Rheinhold; 1985.
136 Evans DG, Walsh S, Jeacock J, Robinson C, Hadfield L, Davies DR, et al. Incidence of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer in a population-based study of 1137 consecutive cases of colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 1997;84:1281-5.[Medline]
137
Aaltonen LA, Salovaara R, Kristo P, Canzian F, Hemminki A,
Peltomaki P, et al. Incidence of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and the feasibility of
molecular screening for the disease. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1481-7.
138 Lynch HT, Lynch JF, Cristofaro G. Genetic epidemiology of colon cancer. In: Lynch HT, Hirayama T, editors. Genetic epidemiology of cancer. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1989. p. 251-77.
139 Vasen HF, Mecklin JP, Khan PM, Lynch HT. The International Collaborative Group on Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (ICG-HNPCC). Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:424-5.[Medline]
140
Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Boland CR, Hamilton SR, Henson DE,
Jass JR, Khan PM, et al. A National Cancer Institute workshop on hereditary nonpolyposis
colorectal cancer syndrome: meeting highlights and Bethesda guidelines. J Natl Cancer
Inst 1997;89:1758-62.
141 Sankila R, Aaltonen LA, Jarvinen HJ, Mecklin JP. Better survival rates in patients with MLH1-associated hereditary colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 1996;110:682-7.[Medline]
142 Percesepe A, Benatti P, Roncucci L, Sassatelli R, Fante R, Ganazzi D, et al. Survival analysis in families affected by hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer 1997;71:373-6.[Medline]
143 Kolodner RD. Mismatch repair: mechanisms and relationship to cancer susceptibility. Trends Biochem Sci 1995;20:397-401.[Medline]
144 Aaltonen LA, Peltomaki P, Leach FS, Sistonen P, Pylkkanen L, Mecklin JP, et al. Clues to the pathogenesis of familial colorectal cancer. Science 1993;260:812-6.[Medline]
145 Thibodeau SN, Bren G, Schaid D. Microsatellite instability in cancer of the proximal colon. Science 1993;260:816-9.[Medline]
146 Peltomaki P, Aaltonen LA, Sistonen P, Pylkkanen L, Mecklin JP, Jarvinen H, et al. Genetic mapping of a locus predisposing to human colorectal cancer. Science 1993;260:810-2.[Medline]
147 Fishel R, Lescoe MK, Rao MR, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Garber J, et al. The human mutator gene homolog MSH2 and its association with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer [published erratum appears in Cell 1994;77:167]. Cell 1993;75:1027-38.[Medline]
148 Leach FS, Nicolaides NC, Papadopoulos N, Liu B, Jen J, Parsons R, et al. Mutations of mutS homolog in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Cell 1993;75:1215-25.[Medline]
149 Papadopoulos N, Nicolaides NC, Wei YE, Ruben SM, Carter KC, Rosen CA, et al. Mutation of a mutL homolog in hereditary colon cancer. Science 1994;263:1625-9.[Medline]
150 Bronner CE, Baker SM, Morrison PT, Warren G, Smith LG, Lescoe MK, et al. Mutation in the DNA mismatch repair gene homologue hMLH1 is associated with hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer. Nature 1994;368:258-61.[Medline]
151 Peltomaki P, de la Chapelle A. Mutations predisposing to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Adv Cancer Res 1997;71:93-119.[Medline]
152 Akiyama Y, Sato H, Yamada T, Nagasaki H, Tsuchiya A, Abe R, et al. Germ-line mutation of the hMSH6/GTBP gene in an atypical hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer kindred. Cancer Res 1997;57:3920-3.[Abstract]
153 Umar A, Kunkel TA. DNA-replication fidelity, mismatch repair and genome instability in cancer cells. Eur J Biochem 1996;238:297-307.[Abstract]
154 Malkhosyan S, Rampino N, Yamamoto H, Perucho M. Frameshift mutator mutations [letter]. Nature 1996;382:499-500.[Medline]
155 Thibodeau SN, French AJ, Cunningham JM, Burgart LJ, Roche PC, McDonnell SK, et al. Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer: different mutator phenotypes and the principal involvement of hMLH1. Cancer Res 1998;58:1713-8.[Abstract]
156 Kane MF, Loda M, Gaida GM, Lipman J, Mishra R, Goldman H, et al. Methylation of the hMLH1 promoter correlates with lack of expression of hMLH1 in sporadic colon tumors and mismatch repair-defective human tumor cell lines. Cancer Res 1997;57:808-11.[Abstract]
157 Cunningham JM, Christensen ER, Tester DJ, Kim CY, Roche PC, Burgart LJ, et al. Hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter in colon cancer with microsatellite instability. Cancer Res 1998;58:3455-60.[Abstract]
158 Turesky RJ, Lang NP, Butler MA, Teitel CH, Kadlubar FF. Metabolic activation of carcinogenic heterocyclic aromatic amines by human liver and colon. Carcinogenesis 1991;12:1839-45.[Abstract]
159 Kadlubar FF, Butler MA, Kaderlik KR, Chou HC, Lang NP. Polymorphisms for aromatic amine metabolism in humans: relevance for human carcinogenesis. Environ Health Perspect 1992;98:69-74.[Medline]
160 Lang NP, Butler MA, Massengill J, Lawson M, Stotts RC, Hauer-Jensen M, et al. Rapid metabolic phenotypes of acetyltransferase and cytochrome P4501A2 and putative exposure to food-borne heterocyclic amines increase the risk for colorectal cancer or polyps. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1994;3:675-82.[Abstract]
161 Roberts-Thomson IC, Ryan P, Khoo KK, Hart WJ, McMichael AJ, Butler RN. Diet, acetylator phenotype, and risk of colorectal neoplasia. Lancet 1996;347:1372-4.[Medline]
162 Vineis P, McMichael A. Interplay between heterocyclic amines in cooked meat and metabolic phenotype in the etiology of colon cancer. Cancer Causes Control 1996;7:479-86.[Medline]
163 Chen J, Stampfer MJ, Hough HL, Garcia-Closas M, Willett WC, Hennekens CH, et al. A prospective study of N-acetyltransferase genotype, red meat intake, and risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 1998;58:3307-11.[Abstract]
164 Welfare MR, Cooper J, Bassendine MF, Daly AK. Relationship between acetylator status, smoking, and diet and colorectal cancer risk in the north-east of England. Carcinogenesis 1997;18:1351-4.[Abstract]
165 Kampman E, Slattery ML, Bigler J, Leppert M, Samowitz W, Caan BJ, et al. Meat consumption, genetic susceptibility, and colon cancer risk: a US multi-center case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. In press 1999.
166 Slattery M, Potter JD, Samowitz W, Bigler J, Caan B, Leppert M. NAT2, GSTM-1, cigarette smoking, and risk of colon cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. In press 1999.
167 Probst-Hensch NM, Haile RW, Ingles SA, Longnecker MP, Han CV, Lin BK, et al. Acetylation polymorphism and prevalence of colorectal adenomas. Cancer Res 1995;55:2017-20.[Abstract]
168 Bell DA, Stephens EA, Castranio T, Umbach DM, Watson M, Deakin M, et al. Polyadenylation polymorphism in the N-acetyltransferase 1 gene (NAT1) increases risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 1995;55:3537-42.[Abstract]
169 Probst-Hensch NM, Haile RW, Li DS, Sakamoto GT, Louie AD, Lin BK, et al. Lack of association between the polyadenylation polymorphism in the NAT1 (acetyltransferase 1) gene and colorectal adenomas. Carcinogenesis 1996;17:2125-9.[Abstract]
170 Lin HJ, Probst-Hensch NM, Hughes NC, Sakamoto GT, Louie AD, Kau IH, et al. Variants of N-acetyltransferase NAT1 and a case-control study of colorectal adenomas. Pharmacogenetics 1998;8:269-81.[Medline]
171 Chen J, Giovannucci E, Kelsey K, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, et al. A methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism and the risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 1996;56:4862-4.[Abstract]
172 Ma J, Stampfer MJ, Giovannucci E, Artigas C, Hunter DJ, Fuchs C, et al. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism, dietary interactions and risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 1997;57:1098-102.[Abstract]
173 Grambsch PM, Bostick RM, Grandits G, Fosdick L, Darif M, Potter JD. Modeling the labeling index distribution: an application of functional data analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 1995;90:813-22.
174 Whitehead RH, Jones JK, Gabriel A, Lukies RE. A new colon carcinoma cell line (LIM1863) that grows as organoids with spontaneous differentiation into crypt-like structures in vitro. Cancer Res 1987;47:2683-9.[Abstract]
175 Bird RP. Observation and quantification of aberrant crypts in the murine colon treated with a colon carcinogen: preliminary findings. Cancer Lett 1987;37:147-51.[Medline]
176 Corpet DE, Stamp D, Medline A, Minkin S, Archer MC, Bruce WR. Promotion of colonic microadenoma growth in mice and rats fed cooked sugar or cooked casein and fat. Cancer Res 1990;50:6955-8.[Abstract]
177 Brentnall TA, Crispin DA, Rabinovitch PS, Haggitt RC, Rubin CE, Stevens AC, et al. Mutations in the p53 gene: an early marker of neoplastic progression in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 1994;107:369-78.[Medline]
178 Morson BC. The polyp-cancer sequence in the large bowel. Proc R Soc Med 1974;67:451-7.
179 Hill MJ, Morson BC, Bussey HJ. Aetiology of adenoma-carcinoma sequence in large bowel. Lancet 1978;1:245-7.[Medline]
180 Nathke IS, Adams CL, Polakis P, Sellin JH, Nelson WJ. The adenomatous polyposis coli tumor suppressor protein localizes to plasma membrane sites involved in active cell migration. J Cell Biol 1996;134:165-79.[Abstract]
181 Barth AI, Nathke IS, Nelson WJ. Cadherins, catenins and APC protein: interplay between cytoskeletal complexes and signaling pathways. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1997;9:683-90.[Medline]
182 Polakis P. The adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) tumor suppressor. Biochim Biophys Acta 1997;1332:F127-47.[Medline]
183
Korinek V, Barker N, Morin PJ, van Wichen D, de Weger R,
Kinzler KW, et al. Constitutive transcriptional activation by a ß-catenin-Tcf complex in
APC-/- colon carcinoma. Science 1997;275:1784-7.
184
Morin PJ, Sparks AB, Korinek V, Barker N, Clevers H,
Vogelstein B, et al. Activation of ß-catenin-Tcf signaling in colon cancer by mutations in
ß-catenin or APC. Science 1997;275:1787-90.
185
Peifer M. ß-Catenin as oncogene: the smoking gun. Science 1997;275:1752-3.
186
He TC, Sparks AB, Rago C, Hermeking H, Zawel L, da Costa
LT, et al. Identification of c-MYC as a target of the APC pathway. Science 1998;281:1509-12.
187 Sparks AB, Morin PJ, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW. Mutational analysis of the APC/ß-catenin/Tcf pathway in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 1998;58:1130-4.[Abstract]
188 Baker SJ, Fearon ER, Nigro JM, Hamilton SR, Preisinger AC, Jessup JM, et al. Chromosome 17 deletions and p53 gene mutations in colorectal carcinomas. Science 1989;244:217-21.[Medline]
189 Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Kern SE, Hamilton SR, Preisinger AC, Nakamura Y, et al. Allelotype of colorectal carcinomas. Science 1989;244:207-11.[Medline]
190 Kinzler KW, Nilbert MC, Vogelstein B, Bryan T, Levy DB, Smith KJ, et al. Identification of a gene located at chromosome 5q21 that is mutated in colorectal cancers. Science 1991;251:1366-70.[Medline]
191 Fearon ER, Cho KR, Nigro JM, Kern SE, Simons JW, Ruppert JM, et al. Identification of a chromosome 18q gene that is altered in colorectal cancers. Science 1990;247:49-56.[Medline]
192 Fearon ER, Vogelstein B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell 1990;61:759-67.[Medline]
193 Hahn SA, Schutte M, Hoque AT, Moskaluk CA, da Costa LT, Rozenblum E, et al. DPC4, a candidate tumor suppressor gene at human chromosome 18q21.1. Science 1996;271:350-3.[Abstract]
194 Hemminki A, Markie D, Tomlinson I, Avizienyte E, Roth S, Loukola A, et al. A serine/threonine kinase gene defective in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Nature 1998;391:184-7.[Medline]
195 Jenne DE, Reimann H, Nezu J, Friedel W, Loff S, Jeschke R, et al. Peutz-Jeghers syndrome is caused by mutations in a novel serine threonine kinase. Nat Genet 1998;18:38-43.[Medline]
196 Dong SM, Kim KM, Kim SY, Shin MS, Na EY, Lee SH, et al. Frequent somatic mutations in serine/threonine kinase 11/Peutz-Jeghers syndrome gene in left-sided colon cancer. Cancer Res 1998;58:3787-90.[Abstract]
197 Markowitz SD, Wang J, Myeroff L, Parsons R, Sun L, Lutterbaugh J, et al. Inactivation of the type II TGF-ß receptor in colon cancer cells with microsatellite instability. Science 1995;268:1336-8.[Medline]
198
Rampino N, Yamamoto H, Ionov Y, Li Y, Sawai H, Reed JC,
et al. Somatic frameshift mutations in the BAX gene in colon cancers of the microsatellite
mutator phenotype. Science 1997;275:967-9.
199 Losi L, Ponz de Leon M, Jiricny J, Di Gregorio C, Benatti P, Percesepe A, et al. K-ras and p53 mutations in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancers. Int J Cancer 1997;74:94-6.[Medline]
200 Konishi M, Kikuchi-Yanoshita R, Tanaka K, Muraoka M, Onda A, Okumura Y, et al. Molecular nature of colon tumors in hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer, familial polyposis, and sporadic colon cancer. Gastroenterology 1996;111:307-17.[Medline]
201 Wu C, Akiyama Y, Imai K, Miyake S, Nagasaki H, Oto M, et al. DNA alterations in cells from hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer patients. Oncogene 1994;9:991-4.[Medline]
202 Heinen CD, Richardson D, White R, Groden J. Microsatellite instability in colorectal adenocarcinoma cell lines that have full-length adenomatous polyposis coli protein. Cancer Res 1995;55:4797-9.[Abstract]
203
Olschwang S, Hamelin R, Laurent-Puig P, Thuille B, De
Rycke Y, Li YJ, et al. Alternative genetic pathways in colorectal carcinogenesis. Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A 1997;94:12122-7.
204
Huang J, Papadopoulos N, McKinley AJ, Farrington SM,
Curtis LJ, Wyllie AH, et al. APC mutations in colorectal tumors with mismatch repair
deficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996;93:9049-54.
205 Lynch HT, Lynch PM, Albana WA, Lynch JF. The cancer family syndrome: a status report. Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:311-22.[Medline]
206
Herman JG, Umar A, Polyak K, Graff JR, Ahuja N, Issa JP, et
al. Incidence and functional consequences of hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation in colorectal
carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:6870-5.
207 Ahuja N, Mohan AL, Li Q, Stolker JM, Herman JG, Hamilton SR, et al. Association between CpG island methylation and microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 1997;57:3370-4.[Abstract]
208 Myohanen SK, Baylin SB, Herman JG. Hypermethylation can selectively silence individual p16ink4A alleles in neoplasia. Cancer Res 1998;5 8:591-3.
209 Brentnall TA. Risk factors for colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease. In: Rutgeerts P, Colombel JF, Hanauer SB, Scholmerich J, Tytgat GN, van Gossum A, editors. Advances in inflammatory bowel diseases. Falk Symposium No. 106. Dordrecht (The Netherlands): Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1999. p. 159-67.
210 Brentnall TA, Crispin DA, Bronner MP, Cherian S, Hueffed M, Rabinovitch PS, et al. Microsatellite instability in nonneoplastic mucosa from patients with chronic ulcerative colitis. Cancer Res 1996;56:1237-40.[Abstract]
211 Cahill DP, Lengauer C, Yu J, Riggins GJ, Willson JK, Markowitz SD, et al. Mutations of mitotic checkpoint genes in human cancers. Nature 1998;392:300-3.[Medline]
212 Loeb LA. Mutator phenotype may be required for multistage carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 1991;51:3075-9.[Medline]
213 McMichael AJ, Potter JD. Dietary influences upon colon carcinogenesis. In: Hayashi Y, Nagao M, Sugimuta T, Takayama S, Tomatis L, Wattenberg LW, et al, editors. Diet, nutrition and cancer. Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium of the Princess Takamatsu Cancer Research Fund. Tokyo (Japan): Jpn Sci Soc Press; 1986. p. 275-90.
214 Potter JD. Reconciling the epidemiology, physiology, and molecular biology of colon cancer. JAMA 1992;268:1573-7.[Medline]
215 Wagner C. Biochemical role of folate in cellular metabolism. New York (NY): Marcel Dekker; 1995.
216 Feinberg AP, Vogelstein B. Hypomethylation of ras oncogenes in primary human cancers. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1983;111:47-54.[Medline]
217 el-Deiry WS, Nelkin BD, Celano P, Chiu Yen RW, Falco JP, Hamilton SR, et al. High expression of the DNA methyltransferase gene characterizes human neoplastic cells and progression stages of colon cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991;88:3470-4.[Abstract]
218 Hoffman RM. Altered methionine metabolism, DNA methylation and oncogene expression in carcinogenesis. A review and synthesis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1984;738:49-87.[Medline]
219 Yunis JJ, Soreng AL. Constitutive fragile sites and cancer. Science 1984;226:1199-204.[Medline]
220
Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. DNA methylation and
genetic instability in colorectal cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997;94:2545-50.
221 Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Genetic instability in colorectal cancers. Nature 1997;386:623-7.[Medline]
222 Hague A, Paraskeva C. The short-chain fatty acid butyrate induces apoptosis in colorectal tumour cell lines. Eur J Cancer Prev 1995;4:359-64.[Medline]
223 Wattenberg LW. Inhibition of chemical carcinogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst 1978;60:11-8.[Medline]
224 Sugimura T, Sato S. Mutagens-carcinogens in foods. Cancer Res 1983;43:2415s-2421s.[Medline]
225 Jagerstad M, Reutersward AL, Grivas S, Olsson K, Negishi C, Sato S. Effects of meat composition and cooking conditions on the formation of mutagenic imidazoquinoxalines (MelQx) and its methyl derivatives. In: Hayashi Y, Nagao M, Sugimuta T, Takayama S, Tomatis L, Wattenberg LW, et al, editors. Diet, nutrition and cancer. Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium of the Princess Takamatsu Cancer Research Fund. Tokyo (Japan): Jpn Sci Soc Press; 1986. p. 87-96.
226 Ohgaki H, Hasegawa H, Kato T, Suenaga M, Sato S, Takayama S, et al. Carcinogenicities in mice and rats of IQ, MeIQ, and MeIQx. In: Hayashi Y, Nagao M, Sugimuta T, Takayma S, Tomatis L, Wattenberg LW, et al., editors. Diet, nutrition and cancer. Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium of the Princess Takamatsu Cancer Research Fund. Tokyo (Japan): Jpn Sci Soc Press; 1986. p. 97-105.
227
Kakiuchi H, Watanabe M, Ushijima T, Toyota M, Imai K,
Weisburger J, et al. Specific 5'-GGGA-3'5'-GGA-3'
mutation of the Apc gene in rat colon tumors induced by
2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995;92:910-4.[Abstract]
228 Bingham SA, Pignatelli B, Pollock JR, Ellul A, Malaveille C, Gross G, et al. Does increased endogenous formation of N-nitroso compounds in the human colon explain the association between red meat and colon cancer? Carcinogenesis 1996;17:515-23.[Abstract]
229
Kalgutkar AS, Crews BC, Rowlinson SW, Garner C, Seibert
K, Marnett LJ. Aspirin-like molecules that covalently inactivate cyclooxygenase-2. Science 1998;280:1268-70.
230 Barnes CJ, Cameron IL, Hardman WE, Lee M. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug effect on crypt cell proliferation and apoptosis during initiation of rat colon carcinogenesis. Br J Cancer 1998;77:573-80.[Medline]
231 Tsujii M, Kawano S, Tsuji S, Sawaoka H, Hori M, Dubois RN. Cyclooxygenase regulates angiogenesis induced by colon cancer cells [published erratum appears in Cell 1998;94:following 271]. Cell 1998;93:705-16.[Medline]
232
Ruschoff J, Wallinger S, Dietmaier W, Bocker T, Brockhoff
G, Hofstadter F, et al. Aspirin suppresses the mutator phenotype associated with hereditary
nonpolyposis colorectal cancer by genetic selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:11301-6.
233 Farinati F, Espina N, Lieber CS, Garro AJ. In vivo inhibition by chronic ethanol exposure of methylguanine transferase activity and DNA repair. Ital J Gastroenterol 1985;17:48-9.
234 Garro AJ, Lieber CS. Alcohol and cancer. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1990;30:219-49.[Medline]
235 Potter JD. Hormones and colon cancer [editorial]. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:1039-40.[Medline]
236 McKeown-Eyssen G. Epidemiology of colorectal cancer revisited: are serum triglycerides and/or plasma glucose associated with risk? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1994;3:687-95.[Abstract]
237 McMichael AJ, Potter JD. Host factors in carcinogenesis: certain bile-acid profiles that selectively increase the risk of proximal colon cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1985;75:185-91.[Medline]
238 Giovannucci E. Insulin and colon cancer. Cancer Causes Control 1995;6:164-79.[Medline]
Manuscript received October 5, 1998; revised February 16, 1999; accepted March 31, 1999.
This article has been cited by other articles in HighWire Press-hosted journals:
![]() |
||||
|
Oxford University Press Privacy Policy and Legal Statement |