Affiliations of authors: Population Studies and Human Genetics Division, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Australia.
Correspondence to: David Whiteman, MBBS, PhD, Population Studies and Human Genetics Division, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Post Office Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland 4029, Australia (e-mail: davew{at}qimr.edu.au)
The proposal put forward by Boniol et al. to further investigate the role of solaria in the development of cutaneous melanoma is interesting from an etiologic as well as a public health perspective. They hypothesize that solarium users will be more likely than nonusers to develop melanomas at habitually covered sites (such as the trunk) and will have higher nevus counts overall.
The correspondence by Boniol et al. highlights the nature and intermittency of UV exposure as a driving force underlying the development of melanoma at anatomic sites. By contrast, we have approached this important issue from the perspective of personal susceptibility (1). Although the importance of UV exposure in the development of melanoma is well documented (2,3), the majority of Australians never develop melanoma despite considerable (and, in many cases, extraordinary) exposure to intense UV radiation, which underscores the importance of individual susceptibility. Clearly, these two views are not mutually exclusive and may ultimately be reconciled as our understanding of melanoma development unfolds.
We wish to correct an apparent misconception in the correspondence of Boniol et al., that lentigo maligna melanoma is the only type of melanoma that occurs on the head and neck in association with chronic sun exposure. We found that patients with lentigo maligna melanoma and patients with head and neck melanomas other than lentigo maligna melanoma have very similar risk factor associations (1). Given that approximately 50% of head and neck melanomas are histologic types other than lentigo maligna melanoma (4), it is important to recognize that they are likely to share a similar causal pathway.
We endorse the suggestion of Boniol et al. that further analyses of the NorwegianSwedish Women's Lifestyle and Health Cohort Study (5) should be conducted, even though that large, well-conducted prospective study has the following limitations. First, the cohort is quite young and follow-up is short, and thus the full melanoma burden of the cohort is yet to be realized. This limitation is particularly important with respect to the anatomic distribution of melanomas in the cohort, as we predict that women with low nevus propensity (putative "UV-resistant" women) will have had insufficient exposure time to develop melanoma at routinely exposed sites. Second, the cohort is restricted to women, for whom patterns of dress, sun exposure, and the anatomic distribution of melanomas differ substantially from those of men. Finally, in that study, nevus counts were self-reported, and only asymmetrical nevi larger than 5 mm on the legs were counted. If theories about the genesis and evolution of large nevi through components of UV radiation hold true (6), such a selective measure of nevus burden will be biased toward identifying women with particular sun exposure histories. Despite these limitations, we support the approach suggested by Boniol et al. for stratified analyses according to the nevus counts of study participants, and we agree with them that the findings would be of considerable interest to melanoma researchers and public health policy makers.
NOTES
David Whiteman is a Senior Research Fellow of the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.
REFERENCES
1 Whiteman DC, Watt P, Purdie DM, Hughes MC, Hayward NK, Green AC. Melanocytic nevi, solar keratoses, and divergent pathways to cutaneous melanoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:80612.
2 Armstrong BK, Kricker A. How much melanoma is caused by sun exposure? Melanoma Res 1993;3:395401.[ISI][Medline]
3 Whiteman DC, Whiteman CA, Green AC. Childhood sun exposure as a risk factor for melanoma: a systematic review of epidemiologic studies. Cancer Causes Control 2001;12:6982.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
4 Cox NH, Aitchison TC, Sirel JM, MacKie RM. Comparison between lentigo maligna melanoma and other histogenetic types of malignant melanoma of the head and neck. Scottish Melanoma Group. Br J Cancer 1996;73:9404.[ISI][Medline]
5 Veierød MB, Weiderpass E, Thorn M, Hansson J, Lund E, Armstrong B, et al. A prospective study of pigmentation, sun exposure, and risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma in women. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:15308.
6 Autier P, Severi G, Pedeux R, Cattaruzza MS, Boniol M, Grivegnee A, et al. Number and size of nevi are influenced by different sun exposure components: implications for the etiology of cutaneous melanoma (Belgium, Germany, France, Italy). Cancer Causes Control 2003;14:4539.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Article about this Correspondence
![]() |
||||
|
Oxford University Press Privacy Policy and Legal Statement |