Affiliations of authors: M.-W. Yu, H.-C. Chang, C.-J. Chen (Graduate Institute of Epidemiology, College of Public Health), C.-J. Liu, P.-J. Chen (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine), P.-H. Lee (Department of Surgery, College of Medicine), National Taiwan University, Taipei; Y.-F. Liaw, S.-M. Lin, Liver Research Unit, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang-Gung University, Taipei; S.-D. Lee, Department of Medicine, Veterans General Hospital, Taipei; T.-J. Hsiao, Department of Internal Medicine, Provincial Taoyuan General Hospital, Taiwan.
Correspondence to: Ming-Whei Yu, Ph.D., Graduate Institute of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, No. 1 Jen-Ai Rd., Sec. 1, Rm. 1550, Taipei 100, Taiwan (e-mail: mingwhei{at}ha.mc.ntu.edu.tw).
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The interindividual variation in the risk and age at onset of HCC among chronic HBV carriers can be partly attributed to variability in exposures to aflatoxin-contaminated foods, alcohol, and cigarettes (69). The understanding of the genetic basis of HCC remains primitive. In our previous casecontrol studiesnested within a cohort study involving all of the HBV carriers included in the cohort study presented here as well as 2501 noncarriers of HBVseveral polymorphic genes were found to influence the risk of HCC associated with specific environmental exposures, such as cigarette smoke, aflatoxin B1, and alcohol (7,8,1316). We recently observed a synergistic effect on HCC development for first-degree family history of HCC with a p53 genetic polymorphism among chronic HBV carriers (16).
Other HCC-susceptibility genes may exist, with higher penetrance but lower frequency in the population, that might account for a small fraction of the HCC burden in the population. Two segregation analyses of HCC (17,18) have suggested the existence of a single major gene that could explain the mode of inheritance in some families after taking account of HBV infection. However, data on the magnitude and pattern of the familial aggregation of HCC have been limited. In this study, we used long-term follow-up data to evaluate the absolute HCC risks at a specified age for male HBV carriers with and without a family history of the disease in first-degree relatives. We also did a family study to assess risk for HCC and other types of cancer in relatives of chronic HBV carriers with HCC and of HBV carrier control subjects without HCC. The potential impact of family history of liver cirrhosis on the familial clustering of HCC was also evaluated.
![]() |
SUBJECTS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The cohort consisted of 4841 male HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers aged 3065 years who attended the Liver Unit of Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital and the Government Employee Central Clinics in Taipei, a metropolitan area in northern Taiwan, for regular health examination between August 1988 and June 1992. They all gave their consent to participate in this study and signed an informed consent form. Approximately 76.6% of the study participants were residents of Taipei, 21.2% were from districts near Taipei, and 2.2% were from more distant areas. The general design of this prospective investigation on HCC has already been described elsewhere (7,8,1316). At the initial recruitment examination, in-person interviews were conducted by trained research assistants by use of a structured questionnaire. The recorded data include sociodemographic characteristics, lifetime habits of alcohol and tobacco use, as well as personal and family histories of major chronic diseases in Taiwan. Blood specimens, including white blood cells, serum, and plasma, were also obtained and frozen at -70 °C until subsequent analysis. Participants were monitored for incident HCC by follow-up examinations (including an -fetoprotein measurement and ultrasonography examination) every 612 months and confirmation from medical records and by searches of computer files of national death certification and cancer registry systems. Data on changes in habits of cigarette smoking and alcohol drinking, personal and family histories of major chronic diseases, and vital status of first-degree relatives were obtained during an in-person interview given before each follow-up examination. Although it was not specifically queried, no study participants mentioned that their first-degree relatives were also included in the cohort study at recruitment or follow-up interview of family medical histories. This study was approved by the Department of Health, Executive Yuan.
At the end of all the follow-up examinations, approximately 70% of the surviving HBsAg carriers continued to return for examination. By July 31, 1999, each cohort member had been followed-up for an average of 8.9 years. A total of 132 incident cases of HCC were identified. Ninety case subjects (68.2%) were identified by means of periodic follow-up examinations and 42 (31.8%) through secondary sources of information, including death records and reports from the national cancer registry system. HCC was diagnosed on the basis of either histologic finding or an elevated serum -fetoprotein level (
400 ng/mL) combined with at least one positive image on angiography, sonography, and/or computed tomography. Excluded from the analysis were 33 cohort members (eight of whom were detected with HCC during follow-up) with no available information on family history of HCC, which left a total of 4808 study subjects in the cohort analysis.
CaseControl Family Study
Basically, this family study used the demographic and morbidity/mortality data on their first-degree relatives obtained from the 124 HCC case subjects and 4684 HBsAg carriers unaffected by HCC as proband case and control subjects in the cohort study. Only 24 relatives of the HCC case subjects were reported to have HCC. This number was inadequate to allow precise estimation of the absolute risk of HCC at a specified age among relatives of case families. To increase statistical efficiency, we also consecutively recruited patients with newly diagnosed HCC treated at the Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital (Taipei, Taiwan), the National Taiwan University Hospital (Taipei), and the Taipei Veterans General Hospital (Taiwan). The three hospitals provided a major portion of medical care in Taipei City and its neighborhoods. Case subjects were eligible if the following criteria were met: 1) They were men aged less than 75 years; 2) they were HBsAg carriers; and 3) they were not too ill and willing to cooperate by being personally interviewed. After the patients were informed about the study and had agreed to sign an informed consent form for participation, an in-person interview was scheduled within 2 weeks after diagnosis and a 10 to 20-mL sample of blood was collected from each patient under standardized protocols. Questionnaire data, including items of sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle habits, and personal and family medical histories of major chronic diseases, were collected by trained research assistants. On average, less than 5% of the hospital patients meeting the inclusion criteria approached for interview refused to participate. Finally, a total of 429 HCC patients were recruited from the three participating hospitals. Among these patients, 154 (35.9%) were residents of Taipei City, 144 (33.6%) were from districts near Taipei, and the remaining 131 (30.5%) were from more distant areas. A family history of HCC in parents and/or siblings was reported by 75 (17.5%) patients. In total, there were 553 HCC case probands (124 from the cohort study plus 429 from hospitals) contributing family data in the casecontrol family study.
Family Data
Information on the family history in first-degree relatives (parents, siblings, and children) included the following: whether family members were still living; the age and sex of siblings and children, and, if deceased, their age at death; and whether a diagnosis of liver cirrhosis or cancer had been made in family members, the type of cancer, and the age at which the diagnosis was made. Because the occurrence of HCC may precede the diagnosis of underlying cirrhosis, liver cirrhosis that was reported to occur within 2 years before the diagnosis of HCC was not considered as positive for the history of liver cirrhosis. Half-brothers and half-sisters were not included in the analysis. Relatives who were currently less than 20 years old or who had died before age 20 years were also excluded from this study. Disease history of children was not considered in the present analysis, since only four sons and one daughter were reported to have had HCC.
Statistical Analysis
Analysis of risk among HBsAg carriers. We used the cohort study to estimate the cumulative risks of HCC for male HBsAg carriers who had a family history of HCC in first-degree relatives and for those without such a family history. The data on family history were based on the responses to the baseline questionnaire and were updated according to information on follow-up questionnaires. The cumulative HCC risk estimated from the disease-specific survival curve was assessed with the use of the product-limit method. The standard error of this risk estimate was calculated by a formula originally derived by Greenwood (19). For this analysis, each man was considered to be at risk for HCC from birth until his age at the date of termination of follow-up (if alive and unaffected), until his age at death (if dead and unaffected), or until his age at diagnosis of HCC. Comparison of cumulative risk curves between groups was evaluated by the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to estimate the rate ratio (RR), with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for family history of HCC. A test for trend in the RRs for HCC with increasing number of affected relatives was based on the likelihood ratio test, with the number of relatives affected with HCC treated as a continuous variable in the Cox model. Estimates were made by use of both univariate and multivariate models. Because adjustments for age at recruitment, the total number of siblings in the family, educational levels, and habits of cigarette smoking and alcohol drinking had little effect on the relative risk estimates of HCC for a family history of HCC, we sometimes just present the results from the multivariate analysis. Statistical significance was set at the 5% level; all P values presented are two-sided.
Analysis of risk among relatives of case and control subjects. Data from the casecontrol family study were used to evaluate differences in the occurrence of liver cirrhosis, HCC, and other types of cancer among relatives between case and control families. The statistical significance of the difference in the mean age between two groups was determined by the Student's t test. The analysis of disease risk to relatives used two methods. Odds ratios (ORs) comparing disease risk in brothers, sisters, or all first-degree relatives combined of case subjects with the risk in the same relatives of control subjects were estimated by use of a logit marginal model taking account of within-family dependence as described by Liang and Zeger (20). We fitted the models by use of the GENMOD procedure of the statistical package PC-SAS version 6.12. In the marginal analysis, since the robust estimator of the covariance matrix of the regression coefficient estimates was used, the assumption about the covariance structure (or working correlation matrix) should have very little impact on the inference of the regression parameters. Initially, we analyzed the data by use of both the exchangeable and unstructured working correlation matrix. As expected, the two analyses were almost identical in estimating the regression coefficients and their standard errors. For brevity's sake, we presented in this report only the results from using the exchangeable correlation structure and reported an estimate of the within-cluster correlation coefficient to be .0154. The standard errors of the cumulative risks for relatives calculated were based on the assumption of independence of family members. This might result in inefficient estimation of the standard errors due to the within-family correlation. Despite not taking account of within-family dependence, however, the low estimate for the within-family correlation coefficients suggests that the estimates of standard error should not be distorted to a substantial degree. When risks to fathers and mothers were analyzed separately, an unconditional logistic regression model was used instead.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In the cohort analysis, 15 (78.9%) of the 19 case subjects with a first-degree family history of HCC had only one affected relative, and four case subjects (21.1%) had two or more affected relatives. Overall, the RR for family history of HCC was 2.58 (95% CI = 1.584.22). The RR did not alter materially after adjustment was made for age at recruitment (continuous variable), the total number of siblings in the family, educational levels (senior high school and above, junior high school, or primary school and below), cigarette smoking, and alcohol drinking (RR = 2.41; 95% CI = 1.473.95). Risk increased as the number of affected relatives increased (2 = 12.88; P for trend = .0003). Compared with male HBV carriers without a first-degree family history of HCC, the multivariate RR was 2.09 (95% CI = 1.213.62) for those who had one relative with HCC; for those with two or more affected relatives, the multivariate RR was 5.55 (95% CI = 2.0215.26).
Cumulative risk of HCC was greater for the HBsAg carriers with a family history of HCC than for those without (P = .0001). By 70 years of age, the cumulative risk for male HBV carriers with a first-degree relative affected with HCC was 235.6 per 1000 (95% CI = 95.3375.9 per 1000), whereas the risk for those without HCC was 88.9 per 1000 (95% CI = 67.9109.9 per 1000). No clear evidence existed that familial case subjects had an earlier age of onset of HCC than nonfamilial case subjects because of the lack of statistical power (Table 1).
|
The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age at diagnosis of HCC for the case subjects identified by the cohort study and those case subjects selected from hospitals was 53.8 (9.1) and 51.2 (10.0), respectively (P = .01). The two groups of case subjects were also similar in the total number of relatives (mean [SD]: 6.1 [2.1] for cohort case subjects; 6.1 [2.2] for hospital case subjects) and the proportion having a family history of HCC in first-degree relatives (15.3% of cohort case subjects versus 17.5% of hospital case subjects; P = .89). We thus combined the two groups of case subjects to gain statistical efficiency.
Case and control subjects had similar numbers of relatives in each category of kinship and similar mean ages of fathers and mothers. The mean ages of brothers (P = .0001) and sisters (P = .0001) were significantly older in case families than in control families, as was expected because the case and control subjects were not individually matched or frequency matched on age; HCC case subjects generally are older than unaffected persons (Table 2). The ORs for HCC and liver cirrhosis for relatives of case probands compared with relatives of control probands are shown in Table 3
. There was a greater risk of HCC and liver cirrhosis among relatives of case subjects than among relatives of control subjects. When different types of relatives were analyzed separately, both HCC and liver cirrhosis risks statistically significantly increased for mothers and siblings of case subjects but not for fathers.
|
|
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The prospective nature of the cohort study eliminated the recall bias because of differential reporting of family history of cancer by case and control subjects in a retrospective design. In the cohort study, however, the method of using family-history information did not take into account the possible effects of family structure and the age differences among families in assessing familial risk of HCC. In the casecontrol family study, we treated each relative ascertained through case and control subjects as the analytic unit. The increased risk of HCC in relatives of case subjects was present, even after allowing age and sex in the model.
Although it has been suggested that chronic infection with HBV may be through transmission of this virus between siblings during early childhood in certain areas (22), mother-to-child vertical transmission has been well established as the major route of acquiring chronic HBV infection in Taiwan (2325). It is estimated that 30%85% of the babies born to HBsAg-positive mothers become HBsAg carriers, depending on the status of the maternal HBV e antigen (24). Given the importance of the HBsAg carrier status for HCC risk (2,4), chronic HBV infection is an important source of familial effects for HCC. This study attempted to remove the greatest environmental risk factor for HCC by restricting the analysis to chronic HBV carriers and their first-degree relatives. Although we did not have data on the HBsAg carrier status of family members because of the difficulty of collecting blood samples for all family members, the mothers and siblings of the HBV carrier case and control subjects were very likely to be HBsAg carriers (25).
Dietary habits and other behaviors associated with HCC that cluster in families may also account for some of the observed familial aggregation of the disease. Exposure to aflatoxin-contaminated foods, cigarette smoking, and alcohol drinking are such variables that have been implicated in the etiology of HCC (69). The increased HCC risk was present not only in male relatives of case subjects but also in female relatives whose prevalence of smoking or drinking is believed to be rather low. Furthermore, the familial effect for the development of HCC among male HBV carriers did not show substantial changes when we adjusted for smoking and drinking in the analysis. Therefore, the association between family history of HCC and HCC development is unlikely to be explained on the basis of confounding by these two factors. In nested casecontrol studies (68), the ORs of HCC associated with different levels of aflatoxin exposure measured by use of urinary/serum biomarkers ranged from 3 to 6. No effort in this study was made to investigate aflatoxins because it was not feasible to assess aflatoxin exposure by using biomarkers for thousands of relatives. However, simulation studies (26,27) have shown that a single environmental risk factor, even if it is perfectly associated between relatives, is incapable of doubling disease risk in relatives of those affected compared with those unaffected unless the factor induces a 10-fold or greater increase in risk for the disease.
It is possible that, in the absence of environmental factors, a familial tendency for HCC is not expressed. However, the findings of a greater risk in relatives of case subjects diagnosed before age 50 years and the more remarkable difference in the risk of relatives between case and control families at young ages suggest that transmissible genetic factors may be involved in the development of HCC in some families of HBV carriers with a family history of HCC. Segregation analyses of HCC in Chinese and Alaskan families have suggested a single gene model that could explain the mode of inheritance in some families after taking account of the HBV infection, although no single mode of inheritance has been consistently identified. They also demonstrated an HBVmajor gene interaction (17,18). Regardless of genotype, the risk for persons not infected with HBV was virtually zero (17). HCC usually develops after several decades of chronic HBV infection accompanied by the signs of hepatocyte necrosis, inflammation, and regenerative hyperplasia (3,4). It is possible that the chronic necroinflammatory process caused by persistent HBV infection creates a mutagenic internal environment that unmasks a genetic predisposition to HCC. The higher HCC risks for mothers and siblings than for fathers observed in this study, therefore, may be simply explained by a much higher HBsAg carrier rate among the mothers and siblings of HBV carriers than among the fathers as a result of vertical transmission of the virus (2325).
The molecular basis for such genetic predisposition toward HCC remains to be elucidated. We can hypothesize that the HCC-susceptibility gene may be specific for hepatocarcinogenesis, since no statistically significant excess of other types of cancer was observed in the case families. However, the average age at onset of HCC in Taiwan is about 50 years, while most other common cancers, such as those of the lung, stomach, and large bowel, primarily occur at ages 60 years or older. Because of the early-onset characteristic of HCC and its high fatality, we should not observe a marked familial clustering for cancers of other anatomic sites in the case families. Our study also demonstrated about a twofold higher risk of liver cirrhosis in case families than in control families. Liver cirrhosis is the most important premalignant lesion of HCC (5). Two rare genetic syndromeshemochromatosis and 1-antitrypsin deficiencycharacterized by a high risk of developing liver cirrhosis, have been associated with an increased risk of HCC in Western populations (28,29). However, Chinese HCC patients are rarely reported to have such genetic syndromes. We have identified several polymorphic genes involved in susceptibility to the effect of exposure to certain environmental risk factors (7,8,1316). This geneenvironment interaction might be expressed as a higher familial risk for the first-degree relatives. On the other hand, many allele loss studies on HCC have been carried out (30,31). However, an association between loss of heterozygosity on particular chromosome arms and familial history of HCC in patients with this disease remains to be determined (32).
![]() |
NOTES |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
1 Muir CS, Nectoux J. International patterns of cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr, editors. Cancer epidemiology and prevention. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1996. p. 14167.
2 Beasley RP. Hepatitis B virus. The major etiology of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 1988;61:194256.[Medline]
3 Yu MW, Tsai SF, Hsu KH, You SL, Lee SS, Lin TM, et al. Epidemiologic characteristics of malignant neoplasms in Taiwan. II. Liver cancer. J Natl Public Health Assoc 1988;8:12538.
4 Yu MW, Chen CJ. Hepatitis B and C viruses in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 1994;17:7191.[Medline]
5 Yu MW, Hsu FC, Sheen IS, Chu CM, Lin DY, Chen CJ, et al. Prospective study of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver cirrhosis in asymptomatic chronic hepatitis B virus carriers. Am J Epidemiol 1997;145:103947.[Abstract]
6 Ross RK, Yuan JM, Yu MC, Wogan GN, Qian GS, Tu JT, et al. Urinary aflatoxin biomarkers and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 1992;339:9436.[Medline]
7 Chen CJ, Yu MW, Liaw YF, Wang LW, Chiamprasert S, Matin F, et al. Chronic hepatitis B carriers with null genotypes of glutathione S-transferase M1 and T1 polymorphisms who are exposed to aflatoxin are at increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Hum Genet 1996;59:12834.[Medline]
8 Yu MW, Lien JP, Chiu YH, Santella RM, Liaw YF, Chen CJ. Effect of aflatoxin metabolism and DNA adduct formation on hepatocellular carcinoma among chronic hepatitis B carriers in Taiwan. J Hepatol 1997;27:32030.[Medline]
9 Yu MC, Tong MJ, Govindarajan S, Henderson BE. Nonviral risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma in a low-risk population, the non-Asians of Los Angeles County, California. J Natl Cancer Inst 1991;83:18206.[Abstract]
10 Chen HL, Chang MH, Ni YH, Hsu HY, Lee PI, Lee CY, et al. Seroepidemiology of hepatitis B virus infection in children. JAMA 1996;276:9068.[Abstract]
11
Chang MH, Chen CJ, Lai MS, Hsu HM, Wu TC, Kong MS, et al. Universal hepatitis B vaccination in Taiwan and the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in Children. Taiwan Childhood Hepatoma Study Group. N Engl J Med 1997;336:18559.
12 Chang MH, Chen DS, Hsu HC, Hsu HY, Lee CY. Maternal transmission of hepatitis B virus in childhood hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 1989;64:237780.[Medline]
13 Yu MW, Gladek-Yarborough A, Chiamprasert S, Santella RM, Liaw YF, Chen CJ. Cytochrome P450 2E1 and glutathione S-transferase M1 polymorphisms and susceptibility to hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 1995;109:126673.[Medline]
14 Yu MW, Chiu YH, Chiang YC, Chen CH, Lee TH, Santella RM, et al. Plasma carotenoids, glutathione S-transferase M1 and T1 genetic polymorphisms, and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: independent and interactive effects. Am J Epidemiol 1999;149:6219.[Abstract]
15 Yu MW, Chiu YH, Yang SY, Santella RM, Chern HD, Liaw YF, et al. Cytochrome P450 1A1 genetic polymorphisms and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma among chronic hepatitis B carriers. Br J Cancer 1999;80:598603.[Medline]
16 Yu MW, Yang SY, Chiu YH, Chiang YC, Liaw YF, Chen CJ. A p53 genetic polymorphism as a modulator of hepatocellular carcinoma risk in relation to chronic liver disease, familial tendency, and cigarette smoking in hepatitis B carriers. Hepatology 1999;29:697702.[Medline]
17 Shen FM, Lee MK, Gong HM, Cai XQ, King MC. Complex segregation analysis of primary hepatocellular carcinoma in Chinese families: interaction of inherited susceptibility and hepatitis B viral infection. Am J Hum Genet 1991;49:8893.[Medline]
18 Yang P, Buetow KH, Lustbader ED, Lanier AP, McMahon BJ, Alberts S, et al. Evidence for a major locus modifying risk for primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Hum Genet 1990;47(Suppl)A25.
19 Harris EK, Albert A, editors. Survivorship analysis for clinical studies. New York (NY): Marcel Dekker; 1991.
20 Liang KY, Zeger SL. Regression analysis for correlated data. Annu Rev Public Health 1993;14:4368.[Medline]
21 London WT, Evans AA, McGlynn K, Buetow K, An P, Gao LL, et al. Viral, host and environmental risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study in Haimen City, China. Intervirology 1995;38:155 61.[Medline]
22 Hsieh CC, Tzonou A, Zavitsanos X, Kaklamani E, Lan SJ, Trichopoulos D. Age at first establishment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection and hepatocellular carcinoma risk. A birth order study. Am J Epidemiol 1992;136:111521.[Abstract]
23 Stevens CE, Beasley RP, Tsui J, Lee WC. Vertical transmission of hepatitis B antigen in Taiwan. N Engl J Med 1975;292:7714.[Abstract]
24 Beasley RP, Trepo C, Stevens CE, Szmuness W. The e antigen and vertical transmission of hepatitis B surface antigen. Am J Epidemiol 1977;105:948.[Abstract]
25 Chen DS, Sung JL. Studies on the subtypes of hepatitis B surface antigen demonstration of vertical and intrafamilial transmission of hepatitis B virus. Taiwan I Hsueh Hui Tsa Chih 1978;77:26371.[Medline]
26 Khoury MJ, Beaty TH, Liang KY. Can familial aggregation of disease be explained by familial aggregation of environmental risk factors? Am J Epidemiol 1988;127:67483.[Abstract]
27 Hopper JL, Carlin JB. Familial aggregation of a disease consequent upon correlation between relatives in a risk factor measured on a continuous scale. Am J Epidemiol 1992;136:113847.[Abstract]
28 Niederau C, Fischer R, Sonnenberg A, Stremmel W, Trampisch HJ, Strohmeyer G. Survival and causes of death in cirrhotic and in noncirrhotic patients with primary hemochromatosis. N Engl J Med 1985;313:125662.[Abstract]
29
Mahadeva R, Chang WS, Dafforn TR, Oakley DJ, Foreman RC, Calvin J, et al. Heteropolymerization of S, I, and Z alpha 1-antitrypsin and liver cirrhosis. J Clin Invest 1999;103:9991006.
30 Boige V, Laurent-Puig P, Fouchet P, Flejou JF, Monges G, Bedossa P, et al. Concerted nonsyntenic allelic losses in hyperploid hepatocellular carcinoma as determined by a high-resolution allelotype. Cancer Res 1997;57:198690.[Abstract]
31 Nagai H, Pineau P, Tiollais P, Buendia MA, Dejean A. Comprehensive allelotyping of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene 1997;14:292733.[Medline]
32 Chen PJ, Chen DS. Hepatitis B virus infection and hepatocellular carcinoma: molecular genetics and clinical perspectives. Semin Liver Dis 1999;19:25362.[Medline]
Manuscript received October 7, 1999; revised May 2, 2000; accepted May 9, 2000.
This article has been cited by other articles in HighWire Press-hosted journals:
![]() |
||||
|
Oxford University Press Privacy Policy and Legal Statement |