REPORTS

Loss of Heterozygosity at D14S62 and Metastatic Potential of Breast Cancer

Peter O'Connell, Kathryn Fischbach, Susan Hilsenbeck, Syed K. Mohsin, Suzanne A. W. Fuqua, Gary M. Clark, C. Kent Osborne, D. Craig Allred

Affiliations of authors: P. O'Connell, K. Fischbach, S. K. Mohsin, D. C. Allred (Department of Pathology), S. Hilsenbeck, S. A. W. Fuqua, G. M. Clark, C. K. Osborne (Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine), The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio.

Correspondence to present address: Peter O'Connell, Ph.D., Baylor College of Medicine, Baylor Breast Center, One Baylor Plaza, MS600, Houston, TX 77030.


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Notes
 References
 
BACKGROUND: In breast cancer progression, the prevalence of damage at specific genetic loci often increases with the stage of the lesion (i.e., from noninvasive to invasive to metastatic). By use of genetic markers and analysis of allelic imbalances (loss of heterozygosity [LOH]) to compare DNA samples from paired normal and breast tumor tissues, we examined whether specific genetic changes in primary breast cancers can serve as biomarkers of metastatic potential. METHODS: DNA samples from 76 patients with primary breast cancer (42 with axillary lymph node-negative disease and 34 with axillary lymph node-positive disease) were genotyped with four genetic markers spanning chromosome 14q31-q32. The intensity ratios of the two genetic alleles in normal-tumor DNA pairs were examined in genetically informative individuals. LOH was scored when the tumor allele intensity ratio (tumor allele 1/tumor allele 2) divided by the normal allele intensity ratio (normal allele 1/normal allele 2) was either less than 0.71 (tumor allele 1 LOH) or greater than 1.4 (tumor allele 2 LOH). RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to our expectations, we found statistically significantly more LOH events at markers D14S62 (two-sided P = .001) and D14S51 (two-sided P = .02) in primary breast cancers from patients with lymph node-negative disease versus lymph node-positive disease, suggesting the presence of a gene in this region that affects metastatic potential. Analysis of small interstitial or terminal deletions in the tumors of six especially informative patients with lymph node-negative disease places the putative metastasis-related gene in a 1490-kilobase region near D14S62. IMPLICATIONS: LOH in the D14S62 region may impede the process of metastasis. Therefore, the D14S62 region LOH profile may have prognostic implications, and the isolation of the metastasis-related gene(s) in this region may lead to better diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer.



    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Notes
 References
 
Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death among women in the United States (1,2). Despite advances in surgery and adjuvant treatment, the extent of disease at diagnosis (e.g., tumor size and the presence or absence of metastases) remains the major predictor of survival. Five years after diagnosis, only about 10% of the women with breast cancer, but no metastases in the axillary lymph nodes, die of their disease compared with nearly 30% of the women with breast cancer and metastases in the axillary lymph nodes and 80% of the women diagnosed with distant metastases (3). Even among the patients with lymph node-negative disease, up to 30% of the women will eventually develop local or distant metastases and die of their disease. Genetic tests capable of identifying patients at risk for metastatic spread and/or better treatment targeted to eradicate metastatic tumor deposits could have a dramatic impact on the overall survival of these patients.

There is convincing evidence that a large number of genetic events play a role in the etiology and progression of individual breast cancers (4-8). An important goal in our efforts to understand and treat breast cancer is the identification of the genetic events that herald progression from local to metastatic disease. When used in polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays (9), microsatellite markers amplify locus-specific genetic polymorphisms present at high frequencies on all human chromosomes (10-14). For individuals who are genetically informative for a marker (distinguishable maternally and paternally derived alleles), loss of heterozygosity (LOH, or allelic imbalance) assays can compare normal and tumor DNA, and de novo genetic changes in the tumor DNA can be detected (15-18). LOH events arise during the evolution of tumors—loss (or amplification) of a chromosome segment confers a growth advantage to the mutated tumor cell relative to its neighbors and the expanding subclones of tumor cells all inherit the LOH event. Therefore, the presence of LOH indicates that the tumor is a clonal neoplasm, and high-frequency sites of deletion detected by LOH have been associated with sites of tumor suppressor genes.

Previous reports (15-18) document a complex relationship between LOH, tumor suppressor genes, and breast cancer, and many LOH loci have been identified. However, with the exception of the recently identified hereditary breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 (19,20), which may account for up to 5%-10% of the cases, no single genetic event is known to be necessary and sufficient to lead to breast cancer. Some reports (21,22) demonstrate a link between LOH and metastatic potential. High levels of expression of tumor suppressor genes, such as nonmetastatic 23 (NM23, the human homologue of the Drosophila abnormal wing development gene), may interfere with the development of lymph node metastases (21). A statistically significant increase in LOH events involving an unknown gene on chromosome 16q is associated with distant metastases in breast cancers (22).

In previous studies (23,24), we have detected increasing rates of LOH in progressively higher stages of breast cancer evolution, with the lowest rates being seen in hyperplasias and the highest rates being seen in primary invasive breast cancer and metastases. This proved to be the case for all of the 15 markers that we tested, with the single exception of D14S62 at 14q31.2 where rates were much higher in primary tumors than in metastases. To further investigate this unexpected result, we tested additional markers in this region of chromosome 14q (D14S302, D14S265, and D14S51) in an expanded set of primary breast cancers from patients with lymph node-negative and lymph node-positive disease.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Notes
 References
 
Sample Selection and Preparation

Histologic slides from routine, archival, clinical specimens were screened microscopically for adequate amounts of control (normal) tissue and invasive or metastatic breast cancers. For all of the patients with lymph node-negative disease, normal tissue was recovered from normal lymph nodes (75% of the specimens) or from benign breast tissue (25% of the specimens). For patients with lymph node-positive disease, normal tissue was harvested from lymph nodes (90% of the specimens) or benign breast tissue (10% of the specimens). On the basis of data (25) suggesting that morphologically normal breast tissue (terminal duct lobular units) closely adjacent to breast cancer may occasionally show LOH for some loci, we may be slightly underestimating LOH for some markers when adjacent terminal duct lobular units were the only normal tissues available. Samples of normal/tumor tissue pairs were microdissected from a total of 42 specimens from women with lymph node-negative breast cancer and from a total of 34 specimens from women with lymph node-positive breast cancer. The overall study and the protocol used to select archival specimens were reviewed and approved by The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Institutional Review Board.

Microdissection of specimens was performed on serial sections from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks. Alternating 3- and 10-µm-thick sections were cut from the formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks and float mounted on glass slides. The 3-µm-thick slides were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and examined under the light microscope to locate regions of normal and cancer tissues; these regions were outlined with a felt-tipped pen. The marked slide was used as a template to guide microdissection from corresponding regions of the unstained 10-µm-thick sections. Samples were screened microscopically to ensure that at least 75% or more of the cellularity of each sample was derived from the targeted tissue. Microdissection was performed on a light box under a dissecting microscope.

DNA was liberated from the microdissected specimens by the use of a modification of the procedure developed by O'Connell et al. (23,24) and by Wright and Manos (26). Briefly, paraffin and lipids were first extracted in 0.4 mL of octane, and the lysate was digested for 3-12 hours at 55 °C in 50 µL of 0.01 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.5), 0.001 M EDTA, 0.045% Nonidet P-40 (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO), and 0.045% Tween 20 (Sigma Chemical Co.) containing 1.0 mg/mL proteinase K (Life Technologies, Inc. [GIBCO BRL], Gaithersburg, MD). The lysate was heated to 95 °C for 15 minutes to inactivate the protease and stored at -20 °C. Samples were diluted between 1 : 5 and 1 : 15 in lysis buffer without protease, and 5 µL of diluted lysate was used in PCR assays.

PCR-Based LOH Assays

Samples were independently evaluated for LOH at each of the four polymorphic 14q loci (see Table 1).Go The antisense primer was 5'-radiolabeled in a standard polynucleotide kinase reaction by 3000 Ci/mmol[{gamma}-32P]adenosine triphosphate (ATP) (Du Pont NEN, Boston, MA) at a molar ratio of 18 [{gamma}-32P]ATP : 1 primer, as previously described (23,24). Thirty cycles of PCR (denaturing at 94 °C for 30 seconds, annealing at 55 °C for 1 minute, and extension at 72 °C for 1 minute) were carried out in a 15-µL assay containing 5 µL of diluted lysate, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.1 M spermidine (Sigma Chemical Co.), 0.1 µM of each PCR primer, 0.1 µM deoxynucleoside triphosphate (Life Technologies, Inc.), and 0.5 U of Taq polymerase (The Perkin-Elmer Corp., Branchburg, NJ). Amplified DNA was diluted 1 : 1 with stop solution (97% formamide, 1% EDTA, 0.1% bromophenol blue, and 0.1% xylene cyanol) and denatured at 85 °C for 2 minutes. Three microliters of denatured DNA from each sample was loaded onto a 7% denaturing polyacrylamide gel (19 : 1 acrylamide/bis-acrylamide) containing 32% formamide and 34% urea and was fractionated by gel electrophoresis for 2.5 hours at 60 W. Gels were transferred to filter paper (Whatman 3MM; WR Balston, Ltd., Maidstone, U.K.), covered with plastic wrap, equilibrated with 20% methanol and 20% acetic acid solution, and dried. Dried gels were exposed to x-ray film (Fuji Photo Film Company, Tokyo, Japan) without an intensifying screen (usually 16 hours).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Samples, tumor type, histologic grade, mitotic index, and LOH profile of primary invasive breast cancers studied from lymph node-negative patients and lymph node-positive patients*

 
Genetic markers used in this study spanned chromosome 14q31-q32 and included D14S51 (forward primer oligonucleotide primer 5'-ATGCTCAATGAACAGCCTGA-3'; reverse primer 5'-GATTCTGCACCCCTAAATCC-3'), D14S62 (forward primer 5'-ATCACACAACTGGAGGCTTC; reverse primer 5'-CAAACCAGCACCACTGTTAG-3'), D14S265 (forward primer 5'- GTGCCACAATCTGTTGATCC-3'; reverse primer 5'-ACTATATGCGTGGGTGAGCA-3'), D14S302 (forward primer 5'-TCCAGAGAAACTGGCATAGC-3'; reverse primer 5'-GGCTGCAGTGACCTATGATT-3'), D14S979 (forward primer 5'-CCTTCCGAACAAGTCCC-3'; reverse primer 5'-TGATAAATAGATGCTCAATGAACAG-3'), D14S1067 (forward primer 5'-TGTCTAATGTACCCAGACGC-3'; reverse primer 5'-CTATCATTTCACATAGCCGC-3'), and D14S1246 (forward primer 5'-ACACTGCAGGCACTCCAAAT-3'; reverse primer 5'-TTTGGAATCATTATT-CATGACCC-3'), which span a 15-centimorgan (cM) region of distal chromosome 14q. Further details concerning oligonucleotide primer sequences and polymorphisms can be obtained from the Genome Data Base (GDBTM) at The Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore, MD) (27). The GDB World-Wide-Web URL is http://gdbwww.gdb.org/. Genetically informative samples showed two distinguishable alleles. Only 5% of the specimens showed evidence of microsatellite instability, and these were excluded from further analysis. The intensity ratio of the two allelic bands of DNA from normal tissue relative to that obtained from breast cancer cells from the same case patient was calculated by use of digitized data collected with a phosphorimager and analyzed with the Molecular Dynamics ImageQuant software package (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA). LOH ratios were calculated by inserting the tumor and normal allele intensities into the following formula: (tumor allele 1/tumor allele 2)/(normal allele 1/normal allele 2). LOH was scored when the intensity ratio equaled either less than 0.71 (tumor allele 1 LOH) or greater than 1.4 (tumor allele 2 LOH). For example, in Fig. 1,Go allele-specific pixel values obtained for D14S302 in sample 85-3090 were (5777/31578)/(17305/20636) = 0.21, a comparative ratio of 4.67 (1/0.21). The chosen level (i.e., 75%) of enrichment of targeted tumor cells was adequate to meet or exceed this 1.4-fold comparative ratio in specimens with LOH. The LOH assays were repeated at least two times to confirm results.




View larger version (139K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Analysis of chromosome 14q loss of heterozygosity (LOH) events. Left—digital data obtained from phosphoimager: 1 = normal DNA and 2 = tumor DNA. Right—phosphoimager data quantitating relative peak areas. A) Representative LOH data for each of the four markers tested. B) LOH data from four of six highly informative samples (see Table 1Go). Sample 87-0253 exhibited LOH for D14S265 (shown) but not for D14S62 (not shown). Sample 88-2459 exhibited LOH for D14S62 (shown) but not for D14S265 (not shown). Samples 87-5002 and 90-2980 exhibited LOH for D14S62 (shown) but not for D14S51 (not shown). The pattern of genetic losses indicates the metastasis-related region maps between D14S265 and D14S51. A1 = allele 1; A2 = allele 2; NST = invasive ductal carcinoma of no special type; ILC = invasive lobular carcinoma; ILCV = invasive lobular carcinoma variant; and MDV = invasive medullary carcinoma variant.

 
Mapping of Yeast Artificial Chromosomes (YACs)

Human YACs were isolated from the Human Polymorphism Study Center (CEPH, Paris, France) recombinant DNA library and were propagated in minimal medium, as previously described by Albertsen et al. (28). YACs were tested with the markers described above and with a nonpolymorphic marker, D14S1246 (14). PCR products were amplified as above but with oligonucleotide primers that were not isotopically labeled. PCR products were visualized on 2% agarose gels run in 1x Tris-borate-EDTA buffer and stained with 0.5 µg/mL of ethidium bromide. YACs were sized by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (28). YACs 755c2, 772e4, and 859d4 were selected for our mapping studies on the basis of previously published data [(14); see also online data at http://www-genome.wi.mit.edu/].

Statistical Methods

LOH frequency was compared by Fisher's exact test between primary tumors from patients with axillary lymph node-negative and lymph node-positive primary breast cancer patients to identify loci that might be important in progression to metastatic disease. Metastatic lesions were not included in these calculations. In addition, information on histologic subtype, tumor grade, and tumor mitotic index was likewise compared with LOH status and with nodal status by use of Fisher's exact test (subtype and grade) or two-sample Student's t tests (mitotic index) to determine whether the observed differences in LOH frequency were possibly due to imbalances in the distribution of these factors. All statistical tests were two-sided at the P = .05 level of significance. Analyses were performed by use of SAS (Version 6.11; SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC).


    RESULTS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Notes
 References
 
LOH Studies

Specimens of breast cancer were microdissected as described in the "Materials and Methods" section to obtain normal tissue, primary tumors, and, for patients with lymph node-positive disease, matched nodal metastases (if available). Of the 76 subjects included in this study, 42 were negative for metastases in the axillary lymph nodes and 34 were positive for the presence of metastases in the axillary lymph nodes. Only the primary breast cancers were included in our analysis of LOH. Histologic subtypes included invasive ductal breast cancers of no special type (81%), invasive lobular breast cancers (11%), and other types, such as mucinous carcinoma and medullary variants (8%). LOH studies were carried out on both lymph node-negative and lymph node-positive primary breast cancers with four 14q markers. The sex-averaged recombination frequencies and map order for these markers were centromere-//-D14S302-10 cM—D14S265-3 cM—D14S62-2 cM—D14S51-//-telomere.

Fig. 1, GoA, shows representative LOH data for each of the four markers. Table 1Go summarizes the tumor type, tumor grade, mitotic index, and LOH status of these specimens. Table 2Go shows the breakdown of LOH frequency by marker and by nodal status. LOH at D14S62 was observed in 68% of the lymph node-negative primary cancers but in only 24% of the lymph node-positive primary tumors (two-sided Fisher's exact test; P = .001). The pattern of D14S62-region marker homozygosity was identical in metastatic tissue samples matched to the lymph node-positive primaries, with the exception of case 92-1509, which exhibited identical LOH patterns for D14S302 and D14S51 in both the primary and the metastatic lesions but exhibited LOH for D14S265 only in the primary breast tumor. As shown in Table 2Go, high rates of LOH were observed for marker D14S302 in all primary breast cancers regardless of nodal status. However, the more distal markers (D14S62 and D14S51) showed high rates of LOH in the lymph node-negative primary breast cancers, but substantially decreased rates of LOH in the lymph node-positive primary breast cancers. Thus, the presence of D14S62 LOH in a primary breast tumor has a strong negative association with metastatic disease.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Rates of 14q loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in primary breast cancers taken from breasts with (lymph node-positive) or without (lymph node-negative) evidence of metastases*

 
Localization of the Breast Cancer Metastasis-Related Gene on Chromosome 14q

Although most of the lymph node-negative tumors that showed LOH exhibited allelic losses at sites distributed throughout the 14q chromosomal region, a subset of six lymph node-negative samples had patterns of LOH that imply the location of the metastasis-related portion of chromosome 14q, as shown in Table 1Go and Fig. 1Go, B. Tumor specimens from case subjects numbered 88-10429 and 88-2459 were heterozygous for D14S265 but showed LOH for D14S62, indicating that the metastasis-related gene is distal to D14S265. Tumor specimens from case subjects numbered 87-5002, 90-2980, and 91-7552 were heterozygous for D14S51 but showed LOH for D14S62, indicating that the metastasis-related gene is proximal of D14S51. The tumor specimen from the case subject numbered 87-0253 showed LOH for D14S265 but was heterozygous for D14S62.

Together, these primary breast tumors from lymph node-negative patients indicate that the metastasis-related gene is in the 5-cM region between the D14S265 and D14S51 loci. A previous study (29) has indicated expanded genetic recombination distances for this part of chromosome 14q. The physical distances between the markers were estimated by testing a series of YAC clones that have been previously placed in this region (14). Fig. 2Go shows that D14S265 and D14S62 were found to reside on a 620-kilobase (kb) YAC, 755c2. Markers D14S1067, D14S979, and D14S51 reside on two contiguous YACs, 772e4 (1170 kb) and 859d4 (870 kb). Marker D14S1246 connects these three YAC clones into a contig. Therefore, the metastasis-related region defined in the high resolution LOH studies cannot exceed the 1490-kb maximum distance between D14S265 and D14S51 (the combined lengths of YACs 755c2 and 859d4). The six LOH breakpoints between D14S265 and D14S51 (flanking D14S62, see Table 1Go and Fig. 2Go, B) indicate that the metastasis-related region is likely to be considerably smaller, on the order of 1000 kb or less.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Physical mapping of D14S62-region markers on yeast artificial chromosomes (YACs). The D14S265, D14S62, D14S1246, D14S1067, and D14S979 markers tested against YAC DNA are shown in their deduced gene order (above) and in the three YACs tested (below). Solid circles indicate the intersections of marker-specific positive polymerase chain reactions with YAC DNAs. Marker D14S1246 (also known as WI-10183) is a non-polymorphic complementary DNA marker (14) and links the three YAC clones into a contig (vertical dashed line). Size of the YAC inserts in kilobases (kb) are shown in parentheses. The metastasis-related region between D14S265 and D14S51 is within the boxed area. The centromere lies to the left of D14551.

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Notes
 References
 
Metastasis is a poorly understood process. The complex angiogenic, proteolytic, differential cell adhesion, and immunologic events that must take place for metastatic spread to occur are difficult to distinguish from the equally complex events that promote local invasion of nonmetastatic primary cancers. At present, poor histologic differentiation, rapid growth, and the large size of a primary cancer are the best predictors of metastatic potential. However, exceptions exist that complicate breast cancer treatment, such as small, well-differentiated, slowly growing tumors that occasionally quickly metastasize, as well as many histologically aggressive tumors that never metastasize. The fact that some types of very highly invasive solid tumors, such as gliomas and basal cell carcinomas of the skin, rarely metastasize suggests that the processes of invasion and metastasis can be separated. Metastatic spread of breast cancer is the most serious complication of this disease and, short of prevention of breast cancer, new interventions to control or prevent metastasis would confer the greatest benefit to these patients. Genetic profiling studies of metastatic versus nonmetastatic breast cancers are a first step in elucidating this process.

To assess the impact of LOH at the D14S62 locus on metastasis, we measured LOH at the D14S62 locus in a set of primary cancers for which nodal status was known. A total of 68% of the lymph node-negative cancers showed LOH at D14S62 compared with only 24% of the lymph node-positive primary cancers. These differences were statistically significant. These data suggest that LOH at D14S62 could be a predictive marker for improved outcome. In addition, the number of patients with lymph node-negative disease who do not show D14S62 LOH (32%) approximates the recurrence rate (30%) in this otherwise low-risk group of patients (1,2). We are currently carrying out a large prognostic study of D14S62 LOH in primary breast cancer specimens with known clinical follow-up to confirm this hypothesis.

With one exception, the patterns of LOH exhibited by the lymph node-positive primary breast cancers in this study were also detected in matched metastatic lesions, indicating a clonal relationship between primary and metastatic disease. In case 92-1509, the LOH patterns for D14S302 and D14S62 were identical in both the primary and metastatic lesions, indicating a high probability that these lesions are clonally related in this patient. However, the LOH pattern for D14S265 between the primary and metastatic lesion in this case was not concordant—the primary tumor exhibited LOH for this marker and the metastasis did not. This represents a possible example of tumor heterogeneity.

The high rate of LOH at the D14S302 locus in all primary breast cancers (58%) suggests that a tumor suppressor gene is near D14S302 whose loss is associated with the development of breast cancer. LOH was seen frequently at the D14S51 locus in lymph node-negative primary breast cancers. Chang et al. (30) reported high levels of LOH in bladder cancer, including D14S51 and more telomeric markers, suggesting that D14S51 defines the location of a second tumor suppressor gene in this region. Of the 25 primary tumors informative for both D14S302 and D14S51, nine lost both markers, five lost D14S302 exclusively, and three lost D14S51 exclusively. The nearly threefold difference in the rates of LOH at D14S62 in tumor specimens from patients with lymph node-negative versus lymph node-positive primary breast cancers leads us to hypothesize that this region contains an additional gene(s) near D14S62, for which reduced gene dosage impedes metastasis. Given that a subset of our tumors loses either D14S302 or D14S51, the critical D14S62 region may lie between two regions of breast cancer-specific LOH.

It is possible that imbalance in the distribution of tumor characteristics could influence the association between LOH and nodal status. While our sample selection was biased toward larger tumors by the need to choose tumors that were large enough to microdissect manually, statistical analysis revealed no association between nodal status and pathologic grade (P = .53) or mitotic index (P = .32). Invasive lobular carcinoma (11% of the cases) was more often lymph node positive than the other subtypes (P = .05) but had a lower grade and mitotic index (P = .01 and P = .03, respectively). As expected, a highly statistically significant association was observed between histologic grade and mitotic index (P<.0001) for all cancers. There was an association between increased grade and mitotic index with LOH at D14S302 (P = .05) but not at the other markers. This is consistent with the presence of a tumor suppressor gene near D14S302.

Informative LOH events in lymph node-negative breast cancers indicate that the metastasis-related gene resides between D14S265 and D14S51. This region genetically spans 5 cM, but a previous mapping of chromosome 14q (29) indicates a fivefold expansion of the genetic map relative to the physical map in this region, an observation supported by the YAC mapping experiments. Therefore, the D14S265-D14S51 region may encompass as little as one megabase of genomic DNA, making gene isolation efforts feasible. In tumors with LOH, we do not know if a mutation is present in the remaining gene copy. It is possible that a 50% reduction in gene dosage at this locus produces the inhibitory effect on metastasis. The metastasis-related gene, irrespective of whether it encodes a protease, cell adhesion molecule, immunologic factor, or a circulatory survival factor or is a gene for some unknown function, may be at a rate-limiting control point in the metastatic process. Isolation and characterization of this gene will lead to new insights into the metastatic process and may lead to new therapies for patients with metastatic disease. Even without cloning of the proposed metastasis-related gene, these studies have the potential to provide a genetic test that could aid in diagnosing metastasis.


    NOTES
 
Supported by Public Health Service grants P50CA58183, P30CA54174, and CA30195 from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services.

We thank Michelle Schmitz, J. Douglas Rains, and Oredius Presley for their excellent technical assistance.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Notes
 References
 

1 Parker SL, Tong T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics [published erratum appears in CA Cancer J Clin 1997;47:68]. CA Cancer J Clin 1996;46:5-28.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2 American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures—1997. New York (NY): American Cancer Society, Inc.; 1997.

3 SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973-1991: National Cancer Institute, NIH Publ No. 94-2789, 1994.

4 Nowell PC. The clonal evolution of tumor cell populations. Science 1976;194:23-8.[Medline]

5 Klein G. The approaching era of the tumor suppressor genes. Science 1987;238:1539-45.[Medline]

6 Weinberg RA. Oncogenes, antioncogenes, and the molecular bases of multistep carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 1989;49:3713-21.[Medline]

7 Liotta LA, Steeg PS, Stetler-Stevenson WG. Cancer metastasis and angiogenesis: an imbalance of positive and negative regulation. Cell 1991;64:327-36.[Medline]

8 Sager R. Tumor suppressor genes: the puzzle and the promise. Science 1989;246:1406-12.[Medline]

9 Saiki RK, Scharf S, Faloona F, Mullis KB, Horn GT, Erlich HA, et al. Enzymatic amplification of beta-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. Science 1985;230:1350-4.[Medline]

10 Weber JL, May PE. Abundant class of human DNA polymorphisms which can be typed using the polymerase chain reaction. Am J Hum Genet 1989;44:388-96.[Medline]

11 Economou EP, Bergen AW, Warren AC, Antonarakis SE. The polydeoxyadenylate tract of Alu repetitive elements is polymorphic in the human genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990;87:2951-4.[Abstract]

12 Weissenbach J, Gyapay G, Dib C, Vignal A, Morissette J, Millasseau P, et al. A second generation linkage map of the human genome. Nature 1992;359:794-801.[Medline]

13 Gyapay G, Morissette J, Vignal A, Dib C, Fizames C, Millasseau P, et al. The 1993-94 Genethon human linkage map. Nat Genet 1994;7 (2 Spec No):246-339.[Medline]

14 Hudson TJ, Stein LD, Gerety SS, Ma J, Castle AB, Silva J, et al. An STS-based map of the human genome. Science 1995;270:1945-54.[Abstract]

15 Cavenee WK, Dryja TP, Phillips RA, Benedict WF, Godbout R, Gallie BL, et al. Expression of recessive alleles by chromosomal mechanisms in retinoblastoma. Nature 1983;305:779-84.[Medline]

16 Cropp CS, Lidereau R, Campbell G, Champene MH, Callahan R. Loss of heterozygosity on chromosomes 17 and 18 in breast carcinoma: two additional regions identified. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990;87:7737-41.[Abstract]

17 Devilee P, van den Broek M, Kuipers-Dijkshoorn N, Kolluri R, Meera-Khan P, Pearson PL, et al. At least four different chromosomal regions are involved in loss of heterozygosity in human breast carcinoma. Genomics 1989;5:554-60.[Medline]

18 Sato T, Tanigami A, Yamakawa K, Akiyama F, Kazumi F, Satamoto G, et al. Allelotype of breast cancer: cumulative allele losses promote tumor progression in primary breast cancer. Cancer Res 1990;50:1784-9.

19 Miki Y, Swensen J, Shattuck-Eidens D, Futreal PA, Harshman K, Tavtigian S, et al. A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science 1994;266:66-71.[Medline]

20 Wooster R, Bignell G, Lancaster J, Swift S, Seal S, Mangion J, et al. Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Nature 1995;378:789-92.[Medline]

21 Hennessy C, Henry JA, May FE, Westley BR, Angus B, Lennard TW. Expression of the antimetastastic gene nm23 in human breast cancer: an association with good prognosis. J Natl Cancer Inst 1991;83:281-5.[Abstract]

22 Lindblom A, Rotstein S, Skoog L, Nordenskjold M, Larsson C. Deletions of chromosome 16 in primary familial breast carcinomas are associated with development of distant metastases. Cancer Res 1993;53:3707-11.[Abstract]

23 O'Connell P, Pekkel V, Fuqua SA, Osborne CK, Clark GM, Allred DC. Analysis of loss of heterozygosity in 399 premalignant breast lesions at 15 genetic loci. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:697-703.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24 O'Connell P, Pekkel V, Fuqua SA, Osborne CK, Allred DC. Molecular genetic studies of early breast cancer evolution. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1994;32:5-12.[Medline]

25 Deng G, Lu Y, Zlotnikov G, Thor AD, Smith HS. Loss of heterozygosity in normal tissue adjacent to breast carcinomas. Science 1996;274:2057-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26 Wright DK, Manos MM. Sample preparation from paraffin embedded tissues. In: Innes MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, editors. PCR protocols. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; 1990. p. 153-8.

27 Fasman KH, Letovsky SI, Cottingham RW, Kingsbury DT. Improvements to the GDB Human Genome Data Base. Nucleic Acids Res 1996;24:57-63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28 Albertsen HM, Abderrahim H, Cann HM, Dausset J, le Paslier D, Cohen D. Construction and characterization of a human yeast artificial chromosome library containing seven haploid genome equivalents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990;87:4256-60.[Abstract]

29 Nakamura Y, Lathrop M, O'Connell P, Leppert M, Kamboh MI, Lalouel JM, et al. Frequent recombination is observed in the distal end of the long arm of chromosome 14. Genomics 1989;4:76-81.[Medline]

30 Chang WY, Cairns P, Schoenberg MP, Polascik TJ, Sidransky D. Novel suppressor loci on chromosome 14q in primary bladder cancer. Cancer Res 1995; 55:3246-9.[Abstract]

31 Elston CW. Grading of invasive carcinoma of the breast. In: Page DL, Anderson TJ, editors. Diagnostic histopathology of the breast. New York (NY): Churchill Livingstone; 1987. p. 300-11.

Manuscript received December 16, 1997; revised June 11, 1999; accepted June 21, 1999.


This article has been cited by other articles in HighWire Press-hosted journals:


             
Copyright © 1999 Oxford University Press (unless otherwise stated)
Oxford University Press Privacy Policy and Legal Statement