CORRESPONDENCE

Erratum

Erratum: "Computer-Aided Detection of Breast Cancer: Has Promise Outstripped Performance?" by Elmore and Carney [J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:162–3 (Issue 3)]. On pages 162–163, the fourth sentence in the sixth paragraph should read as follows: "It is generally the case that the recall rate for subsequent examinations (incidence screens) is lower than the recall rate for initial examinations (prevalence screens)." The authors regret the error.



             
Copyright © 2004 Oxford University Press (unless otherwise stated)
Oxford University Press Privacy Policy and Legal Statement