Affiliations of authors: Department of Epidemiology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles (SH, ZFZ); Division of Preventive Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (IML, NRC, JEB, SL); Departments of Epidemiology (IML, EG, JEB, SL) and Nutrition (EG), Harvard School of Public Health, Boston.
Correspondence to: Simin Liu, MD, ScD, Division of Preventive Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, 900 Commonwealth Ave., Boston, MA 02215 (e-mail: simin.liu{at}channing.harvard.edu)
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The Women's Health Study is composed of 39 876 health professionals who were 45 years old or older at baseline from April 1993 to January 1996. It was originally designed as a randomized trial of aspirin, vitamin E, and -carotene for prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer, although the
-carotene treatment was terminated in January 1996. This study has been conducted according to the ethical guidelines of Brigham and Women's Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
A 131-item semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaire was administered at baseline to assess averagedietary intake during the previous year (8). Women with more than 70 blanks in the dietary questionnaire or with a daily total energy intake of less than 2514 kJ or more than 14 665 kJ were excluded from these analyses, leaving a cohort of 38 451. Participants completed risk factor questionnaires at baseline and annually thereafter. Glycemic index values were obtained from published tables (9) and from The Nutrition Center of the University of Toronto. We used the mean when multiple glycemic index test values were reported. For mixed dishes, we used a weighted average of the glycemic index of each component food. The glycemic load for each food item was calculated by multiplying the food's glycemic index by the number of carbohydrate grams in a serving. Dietary glycemic load for each participant was estimated by multiplying the glycemic load for each food by the participant's frequency of consumption and then summing over all foods (8). The overall glycemic index for each participant represents the average glycemic index of carbohydrate in the diet and was obtained by dividing the participant's dietary glycemic load by total carbohydrate intake. Glucose was used as the standard in calculating glycemic index and glycemic load values.
The physiologic relevance and validity of dietary glycemic load, as assessed by food-frequency questionnaires, are supported by several studies. In a cross-sectional study of healthy postmenopausal women (8), dietary glycemic load was positively associated with plasma triacylglycerol concentrations and negatively associated with plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations. In another study (10), it was positively associated with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, a marker of systemic inflammation and a risk factor for ischemic heart disease. In prospective cohort studies (7,11,12), dietary glycemic load has been positively associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease and diabetes mellitus.
We categorized dietary exposures into quintiles of intake and, after determining that the data met the assumptions for using Cox proportional hazards modeling, we used this method to estimate hazard ratios. We used baseline dietary intake measurements, assessed with a semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaire, to examine the associations of dietary glycemic load, overall glycemic index, carbohydrate, fiber, nonfiber carbohydrate, sucrose, and fructose with colorectal cancer risk. To test for trend, we assigned the quintile median value to each subject in that quintile. We report 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and P values from two-sided statistical tests. All dietary variables were adjusted for total energy intake with the residual method (13). Follow-up time was calculated from baseline through the date of diagnosis of colorectal cancer, death, drop-out, loss to follow-up, or the end of the follow-up period.
Average follow-up was 7.9 years, during which we identified 174 patients with incident colorectal cancer (148 of the colon and 26 of the rectum). The mean dietary glycemic load for the cohort was 117, and the mean overall glycemic index was 53 (Table 1). In age-adjusted models, we observed statistically significant positive associations of both dietary glycemic load and overall glycemic index with colorectal cancer (Table 2). In multivariable analyses that included total energy intake and nutrient risk factors (fat, fiber, folate, calcium, and vitamin D) in the models, colorectal cancer risk estimates for dietary glycemic load increased (adjusted relative risk [RR] = 2.85, 95% CI = 1.40 to 5.80, comparing extreme quintiles of dietary glycemic load; Ptrend = .004), but overall glycemic index risk estimates were essentially unchanged (adjusted RR = 1.71, 95% CI = 0.98 to 2.98; Ptrend = .04, comparing extreme quintiles of overall glycemic index). Including fruit and vegetable, red meat, and whole grain intake in place of the nutrient risk factors resulted in risk estimates similar to those in the age-adjusted models, although confidence intervals were wider and crossed the null (data not shown). Risk estimates for total carbohydrate (adjusted RR = 2.41, 95% CI = 1.10 to 5.27, comparing extreme quintiles of carbohydrate; Ptrend = .02), nonfiber carbohydrate (corresponding RR = 2.60, 95% CI = 1.22 to 5.54; Ptrend = .02), sucrose (corresponding RR = 1.51, 95% CI = 0.90 to 2.54; Ptrend = .06), and fructose (corresponding RR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.13 to 3.87; Ptrend = .08) were consistent with but lower than the dietary glycemic load findings. Fiber intake was inversely associated with risk, although estimates crossed the null, and there was no evidence of a linear trend (adjusted RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.45 to 1.38, comparing extreme quintiles of fiber; Ptrend = .50).
|
|
|
The dietary and lifestyle factors that we examined are interrelated and difficult to measure. Our findings may be biased by unmeasured confounders or by residual confounding. In this cohort, women with a high dietary glycemic load intake, compared with women with a low intake, had an otherwise beneficial risk profile. Residual confounding by risk factors such as body mass index, physical inactivity, smoking, alcohol use, and nutrient intake would most likely bias risk estimates toward the null, implying that true risk may be greater than our estimates. When the glycemic index value of a particular food was unavailable, we used the reported value for a similar food. This procedure is a source of possible measurement error because glycemic index values can vary greatly, depending largely on how a food is processed and cooked. A dietary questionnaire designed primarily to measure glycemic load could include different or additional food items and groupings that would allow better discrimination between participants and possibly facilitate comparison between studies. A diet with a high glycemic load may increase the risk of colorectal cancer by affecting insulin and insulin-like growth factors or, as suggested by the cross-sectional association between dietary glycemic load and C-reactive protein (10), by exacerbating proinflammatory responses, either locally or systemically. Further work is needed to elucidate these mechanisms. In conclusion, findings from this prospective cohort study suggest that a diet with a high glycemic load may increase the risk of colorectal cancer in women.
![]() |
NOTES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
We acknowledge the crucial contributions of the entire staff of the Women's Health Study (WHS), under the leadership of David Gordon, as well as Susan Burt, Mary Breen, Marilyn Chown, Lisa Fields-Johnson, Georgina Friedenberg, Inge Judge, Jean MacFadyen, Geneva McNair, David Potter, Claire Ridge, and Harriet Samuelson. We are also indebted to the 39,876 dedicated and committed participants of the WHS.
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
1 Giovannucci E. Insulin and colon cancer. Cancer Causes Control 1995;6:16479.[ISI][Medline]
2 McKeown-Eyssen G. Epidemiology of colorectal cancer revisited: are serum triglycerides and/or plasma glucose associated with risk? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1994;3:68795.[Abstract]
3 Kaaks R, Lukanova A. Energy balance and cancer: the role of insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I. Proc Nutr Soc 2001;60:91106.[ISI][Medline]
4 Giovannucci E. Insulin-like growth factor-I and binding protein-3 and risk of cancer. Horm Res 1999;51 Suppl 3:3441.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
5 Wolever TM, Miller JB. Sugars and blood glucose control. Am J Clin Nutr 1995;62(1 Suppl):212S221S; discussion 221S227S.[Abstract]
6 Jenkins DJ, Wolever TM, Taylor RH, Barker H, Fielden H, Baldwin JM, et al. Glycemic index of foods: a physiological basis for carbohydrate exchange. Am J Clin Nutr 1981;34:3626.[Abstract]
7 Salmeron J, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Wing AL, Willett WC. Dietary fiber, glycemic load, and risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women. JAMA 1997;277:4727.[Abstract]
8 Liu S, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Holmes MD, Hu FB, Hankinson SE, et al. Dietary glycemic load assessed by food-frequency questionnaire in relation to plasma high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and fasting plasma triacylglycerols in postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr 2001;73:5606.
9 Foster-Powell K, Miller JB. International tables of glycemic index. Am J Clin Nutr 1995;62:871S890S.[Abstract]
10 Liu S, Manson JE, Buring JE, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Ridker PM. Relation between a diet with a high glycemic load and plasma concentrations of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in middle-aged women. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;75:4928.
11 Liu S, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Hu FB, Franz M, Sampson L, et al. A prospective study of dietary glycemic load, carbohydrate intake, and risk of coronary heart disease in US women. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;71:145561.
12 Salmeron J, Ascherio A, Rimm EB, Colditz GA, Spiegelman D, Jenkins DJ, et al. Dietary fiber, glycemic load, and risk of NIDDM in men. Diabetes Care 1997;20:54550.[Abstract]
13 Willett W. Nutritional epidemiology. Vol 30. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1998.
14 Durrleman S, Simon R. Flexible regression models with cubic splines. Stat Med 1989;8:55161.[ISI][Medline]
15 Franceschi S, Dal Maso L, Augustin L, Negri E, Parpinel M, Boyle P, et al. Dietary glycemic load and colorectal cancer risk. Ann Oncol 2001;12:1738.[Abstract]
16 Slattery ML, Benson J, Berry TD, Duncan D, Edwards SL, Caan BJ, et al. Dietary sugar and colon cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1997;6:67785.[Abstract]
17 Levi F, Pasche C, Lucchini F, Bosetti C, La Vecchia C. Glycaemic index, breast and colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2002;13:16889.
18 Terry PD, Jain M, Miller AB, Howe GR, Rohan TE. Glycemic load, carbohydrate intake, and risk of colorectal cancer in women: a prospective cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:9146.
Manuscript received July 22, 2003; revised November 12, 2003; accepted November 22, 2003.
This article has been cited by other articles in HighWire Press-hosted journals:
![]() |
||||
|
Oxford University Press Privacy Policy and Legal Statement |