Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, Vol. 49, 857-866, July 2001, Copyright © 2001, The Histochemical Society, Inc.


ARTICLE

Variations in Dystrophin Complex in Red and White Caudal Muscles from Torpedo marmorata

Mar Royuelaa,b, Gérald Hugonb, François Rivierb, Jean Alain Fehrentzc, Jean Martinezc, Ricardo Paniaguaa, and Dominique Mornetb
a Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Spain
b INSERM U.128, IFR 24, Groupe Muscles and Pathologies, Institut Bouisson-Bertrand, Montpellier, France
c Laboratoire des Amino-acides, Peptides et Protéines, UMR 5810, Faculté de pharmacie, Montpellier, France

Correspondence to: Mar Royuela, Dept. of Cell Biology and Genetics, Univ. of Alcalá de Henares (Madrid), Spain. E-mail: ricardo.paniagua@uah.es


  Summary
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

We present an up-to-date study on the nature, at the protein level, of various members of the dystrophin complex at the muscle cell membrane by comparing red and white caudal muscles from Torpedo marmorata. Our investigations involved immunodetection approaches and Western blotting analysis. We determined the presence or absence of different molecules belonging to the dystrophin family complex by analyzing their localization and molecular weight. Specific antibodies directed against dystrophin, i.e., DRP2 {alpha}-dystrobrevin, ß-dystroglycan, {alpha}-syntrophin, {alpha}-, ß-, {gamma}-, and {delta}-sarcoglycan, and sarcospan, were used. The immunofluorescence study (confocal microscopy) showed differences in positive immunoreactions at the sarcolemmal membrane in these slow-type and fast-type skeletal muscle fibers. Protein extracts from T. marmorata red and white muscles were analyzed by Western blotting and confirmed the presence of dystrophin and associated proteins at the expected molecular weights. Differences were confirmed by comparative immunoprecipitation analysis of enriched membrane preparations with anti-ß-dystroglycan polyclonal antibody. These experiments revealed clear complex or non-complex formation between members of the dystrophin system, depending on the muscle type analyzed. Differences in the potential function of these various dystrophin complexes in fast or slow muscle fibers are discussed in relation to previous data obtained in corresponding mammalian tissues. (J Histochem Cytochem 49:857–865, 2001)

Key Words: dystrophin family, associated proteins, striated muscles


  Introduction
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

MOST BEHAVIORAL OR PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES of animals to any environmental situation involve participation of muscle cells specialized in contraction processes. In all organs in which tissue contraction occurs, there is a relationship between muscle activity and movement. Molecular mechanisms are not always the same because there are a wide variety of muscle cells well adapted to specific functions in each organ. Fast muscle fibers, which are involved in rapid contraction, very quickly give rise to maximal tension but are rapidly fatigable. Slow muscle fibers, which are involved in slow contraction, give rise to less tension but are resistant to fatigability. We carried out a close comparative analysis of these two kinds of skeletal muscles, i.e., red and white muscles, which are also found in the caudal region of fish. The red muscle has short, pen-shaped slow-type fibers. The white muscle has large, long fast-type fibers. Because of this clear difference in size and function, we assessed this material to establish the nature of the dystrophin protein complex in both fiber types. Torpedo marmorata was the first fish described as containing dystrophin, particularly in its electric organ (Chang et al. 1989 ). In this work we therefore studied red and white muscles from T. marmorata.

Since 1987, dystrophin has been known (Hoffman et al. 1987 ) to be the protein that is deficient in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). This is an elongated protein present at the cytoplasmic surface of the vertebrate muscle cell membrane (Hoffman et al. 1987 ). Three other dystrophin-related proteins, i.e., DRP1 (dystrophin-related protein Type 1, or utrophin), DRP2 (dystrophin-related protein Type 2), and dystrobrevins, have also been identified as products of different genes (Wang et al. 1998 ). Dystrophins and utrophin have been detected in muscle of other mammalian species (Pons et al. 1994 ; Wang et al. 1998 ; Rafael et al. 2000 ) and also in other tissues, such as the electric organ, that are derived from skeletal muscle (Chang et al. 1989 ), and in nerves (Rivier et al. 1999a , Rivier et al. 1999b ) of T. marmorata. Dystrophin in mammal skeletal muscle interacts with an associated protein complex (DAPC) to form a link between the cytoskeleton and the extracellular matrix (Ibraghimov-Beskrovnaya et al. 1992 ). This complex consists of two dystroglycans ({alpha}- and ß-) (Deys et al. 1995 ), sarcoglycans ({alpha}-, ß-, {gamma}-, {delta}-, and {epsilon}) that are complexed with sarcospan (Nigro et al. 1996 ; Crosbie et al. 1997 ; McNally et al. 1998 ), and three syntrophins ({alpha}-, ß1-, ß2-) in muscle tissues (Ahn et al. 1996 ). However, new isoforms of syntrophins ({gamma}1- and {gamma}2-) have also been reported and were found expressed as brain-specific protein (Piluso et al. 2000 ). Deficiency or variations in some associated proteins generate a different muscle pathology, but the pathogenesis of all of these related muscular dystrophies is still unclear. This may be due to the heterogeneity of the data recorded, e.g., due to the existence of four dystrophin-related proteins that all share homology with dystrophin's cysteine-rich and C-terminal domains and also because of the muscle type analyzed.

In muscles, dystrophin expression is believed to provide resistance of muscle membrane during contraction processes (Pasternak et al. 1995 ). Thin and thick myofilament sliding leads to muscle sarcomere contraction while forces are laterally transmitted to the extracellular matrix via the dystrophin–glycoprotein complex (DGC). In dystrophin–deficient muscle, the absence of this complex causes sarcolemmal instability, which renders muscle fibers susceptible to necrosis (Menke and Jockusch 1995 ). Then the DGC is thought to play a mechanical and structural function in muscle, but recent findings also suggest a role in cell communication due to associations with a variety of signaling molecules (Cohn and Campbell 2000 ).

This work investigated the possible presence and distribution of dystrophin family products and some dystrophin-associated-like proteins in red and white muscles from T. marmorata. This approach was possible using a large battery of specific monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies produced by us that were authenticated in previous studies as specific for dystrophin, utrophin, or associated proteins (Fabbrizio et al. 1993 , Fabbrizio et al. 1994 ; Rivier et al. 1996 , Rivier et al. 1999a ). After a first screening to select antibodies that would give clear immunofluorescent labeling in the muscle cell membranes studied, we determined the presence and size of the molecules detected using Western blotting technique. Both confocal analyses and immunoprecipitation approaches helped us to determine whether these proteins were differently distributed in fast- and slow-type skeletal muscles. Possible functional implications are discussed.


  Materials and Methods
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Tissues
Transversely striated muscles (red or white) from live T. marmorata fish were dissected and quickly frozen for indirect cytochemical fluorescence labeling or were treated for crude protein extraction.

Antibodies
We used various antibodies specific for various proteins of the dystrophin family. In detail, monoclonal (5G5, 3E7, 5A3, 4A1,) and polyclonal (C) antibodies were directed against dystrophin and/or utrophin molecules. The specificities of all monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies were previously confirmed in muscle and nerve tissues of rabbit (Fabbrizio et al. 1993 ), Torpedo (Rivier et al. 1996 ), and adult bovine heart (Rivier et al. 1999a , Rivier et al. 1999b ). The antigenic sequences, corresponding to the recombinant C-protein that was prepared from a dystrophin fragment derived from the chicken skeletal muscle gene (residues 1173–1728), gave rise to polyclonal antibodies (C as referred to in Pons et al. 1990 ). We used polyclonal antibodies directed against DRP2, {alpha}-dystrobrevin, and sarcospan that were obtained by injecting their specific C-terminal synthetic peptides (ANTLLAS), (GVSYVPYCRS), and (SLTAESEGPQQKI) as antigens, respectively, according to a previously described protocol (Pons et al. 1994 ). In this study, we also used other polyclonal antibodies directed specifically against sarcoglycans ({alpha}, residues PLILDQH; ß, residues AGYIPIDEDRL; {gamma}, residues VREQYTTAT; {delta}, recombinant protein residues 84–290) and ß-dystroglycan (residues PPPYVPP). All antibodies were previously characterized in adult bovine heart (Rivier et al. 1999a , Rivier et al. 1999b ), in a Becker dystrophy patient (Rivier et al. 2000 ), and in other works related to annelid muscles (Royuela et al. 1999 ). The polyclonal antibody against {alpha}-syntrophin (antigenic residues 191–206) was recently detected in Torpedo (Nigro et al. 1996 ). Finally, we used the 13E2 monoclonal antibody that we previously obtained from a crude extract of T. marmorata electric organ (as reported in Rivier et al. 1996 ) directed against a 90-kD protein rather than against a 400-kD protein. This 13E2 antibody was of interest mainly because of the apparent molecular weight of the protein detected in crude extract obtained from Torpedo electric organ, which corresponded to the Ao protein reported by Japanese authors as belonging to the dystrophin complex (Yoshida and Ozawa 1990 ). Monoclonal antibodies against {alpha}-, ß-, {gamma}-, and {delta}-sarcoglycans were obtained from Novocastra (Sigma; St Louis, MO).

The specificity of the immunochemical procedures was checked by incubation of sections with non-immune serum instead of primary antibody. As positive controls for this study, skeletal muscle sections of mouse (for polyclonal antibodies) or rabbit (for monoclonal antibodies) were treated simultaneously with the Torpedo muscles.

Western Blotting Analysis
Tissues were homogenized in the extraction buffer (0.05 M Tris-HCl, pH 8) with the addition of a cocktail of protease inhibitors (100 mM iodoacetamide, 0.1 mM phenylmethyl sulfonic fluoride, 0.01 mg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 1 µl/ml leupeptin) in the presence of 1% Triton X-100. Homogenates were centrifuged for 10 min at 10,000 rpm. Supernatants and pellet (resuspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8) were mixed with an equivalent volume of SDS buffer (10% SDS in Tris-HCl, pH 8, containing 50% glycerol, 0.1 mM 2-ß-mercaptoetanol, and 0.1% bromophenol blue). The mixture was denatured for 5 min at 100C and 10-µl aliquots of homogenate were separated in SDS-polyacrylamide slab minigels (3–12% gradient gels). To carefully compare protein extraction, we equilibrated each sample by equilibrating the muscle actin content. Separated proteins were transferred overnight (30 V, 100 mA) in the transfer buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, 192 mM glycine, 0.1% SDS, and 20% methanol). Nitrocellulose membranes (0.2 µm) were blocked with 3% BSA dissolved in TBST buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween-20, pH 8) for 1 hr with specific antibodies and then were incubated with a phosphatase-labeled second antibody (1:3000 dilution; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratory, West Chester, PA). The protein band was visualized with p-nitroblue tetrazolium, and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoylphosphate substrate, as previously described (Fabbrizio et al. 1994 ).

Scanning Densitometry
Western blots were digitized with a 256 gray scale and images were quantitatively analyzed using the NIH 1.62 image program. Each lane was treated independently and corrected by estimation of the relative optical density found in the Coomassie blue gel corresponding to the amount of actin present in the W or R lane. Each blot was obtained in triplicate to avoid errors due to differences in signal intensities. Values were normalized and averages for the three assays were compared between white and red muscles. Their ratio was expressed as a percentage of each component found in red muscle vs white muscle.

Immunoprecipitation
Anti-ß-dystroglycan polyclonal antibody was used as in Araishi et al. 1999 for immunoprecipitation. White or red muscle (0.5 g) from Torpedo was homogenized and solubilized in 2 vol. (w/v) of extraction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 9, 100 mM iodoacetamide, 0.1 mM phenylmethyl sulfonic fluoride, 0.01 mg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 1 µl/ml leupeptin, 1% Triton X-100, and 1% saponin). After centrifugation at 140,000 x g for 45 min at 4C, the resulting supernatant, corresponding to the enriched muscle membrane preparation, was incubated overnight at 4C with anti-ß-dystroglycan polyclonal antibody. The mixture was applied on a prepacked protein A–Sepharose column 1 x 4 cm (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech; Arlington Hts, IL). Resin was recycled with this antigen–antibody solution for 2 hr at 4C and then washed extensively with extraction buffer containing 0.5 M NaCl, until no protein was detected at 280 nm OD. Total elution was obtained after adding 10% SDS solution and aliquots were immediately treated for protein transfer. The resulting nitrocellulose sheets were analyzed using the first specific antibody relative to the component that we intended to detect.

Immunofluorescence Light Microscopy
Cryostat sections (10 µm) of unfixed muscle were labeled with different specific antibodies. Immunoreactions were detected with Cy3-conjugated sheep anti-mouse Ig (for monoclonal antibodies) or Cy3-conjugated sheep anti-rabbit IgG (for polyclonal antibodies). For double detection, sections were first labeled with the monoclonal antibody concomitantly with a polyclonal antibody (against dystrophin-related protein or DAP). In a second step, the monoclonal antibody was revealed with Cy3-conjugated sheep anti-mouse IgG (1:500) and fluorescein-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:100) for all other polyclonal antibodies (Sigma Bio-Sciences Laboratory; St Louis, MO).

Confocal Laser Microscopy
Confocal laser microscopy analyses were performed as described in previous studies (Rivier et al. 1999b , Rivier et al. 2000 ), using a Bio-Rad MRC-1024 apparatus mounted on an Optiphot II Nikon fluorescence microscope equipped with a x60 lens (Plan apo; NA 1.4). The two signals were processed using the COMOS software program (BioRad, Hercules, CA). Images were obtained after processing through the Adobe Photoshop (version 3.0) software program and were printed on an Epson Stylus Color 800 printer.


  Results
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Immunofluorescence Analyses
Immunofluorescence reactions were studied through two concomitant investigations and are presented comparatively in two figures, i.e., Fig 1A–1J (white muscle) and Fig 2A–2J (red muscle). It was always clear that the large fibers corresponded to white muscle (fast-type), whereas small fibers were found only in red muscle (slow-type) (see Fig 1 and Fig 2). For these experiments, as later in Western blotting assays, components such as dystrophin and 90-kD protein were viewed with monoclonal antibodies 5A3 and 13E2, respectively, while all other proteins were identified with polyclonal antibodies that we produced. Torpedo dystrophin detection was found (as expected) at the muscle cell membrane with each of the specific antibodies used in this study (Fig 1A and Fig 2A, left panels) and this presentation is repeated in each following image (left panel), excluding Fig 1E and Fig 2E, left panels. The two other dystrophin family proteins studied, i.e., DRP2 and {alpha}-dystrobrevin, are presented in Fig 1A, Fig 1B, Fig 2A, and Fig 2B, middle panels, and were not found at the muscle cell periphery of fast-type fibers (Fig 1) but rather at the membrane of slow-type fibers (Fig 2). ß-Dystroglycan, which is presented in Fig 1C, Fig 1E, Fig 2C, and Fig 2E, middle panels, was detected in both fast- and slow-type fibers. {alpha}-syntrophin Fig 1D and Fig 2D, central portion, was located in fast-type fibers (Fig 1) but was absent in cell membranes of slow-type fibers (Fig 2). Similarly, in Fig 1E and Fig 2E, left panels, a specific monoclonal antibody against a 90-kD protein (as described in Materials and Methods) was clearly detected in the membrane of fast-type fibers (Fig 1) co-localized with ß-dystroglycan but was not present in cell membrane structures of slow-type fibers (Fig 2). In the following set of experiments, we analyzed polyclonal antibodies that we had developed and characterized as specific for sarcoglycan family products. We also obtained a good correlation between results with polyclonal antibodies and similar commercially available specific monoclonal antibodies, in their capacity to detect, at the membrane or not, one of these sarcoglycans. However, only a commercial monoclonal antibody against {alpha}-sarcoglycan was undetectable in both fiber types, in contrast to our polyclonal antibody produced against this protein, which was efficient. In fast fibers (Fig 1), the following differences appeared in the middle panel: {alpha}-sarcoglycan (Fig 1F), {gamma}-sarcoglycan (Fig 1H), and sarcospan (Fig 1J) were all present at the white muscle membrane. In contrast, ß-sarcoglycan (Fig 1G) and {delta}-sarcoglycan (Fig 1I) were not detected at the membrane of these fast-type fibers (Fig 1). In slow fibers (Fig 2), all proteins detected Fig 2F–2J (middle panels, corresponding respectively to {alpha}-, ß-, {gamma}-, {delta}-sarcoglycan, and sarcospan) were found at the cell membrane.



View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Confocal analyses of fast-type muscle fibers from T. marmorata with different antibodies related to dystrophin family products or dystrophin-associated proteins. The antibodies used in these experiments were monoclonal for dystrophin (5A3) and the 90-kD protein (13E2) and polyclonal for all other components studied. White muscle cross-sections (10 µm) from Torpedo were viewed using antibodies directed against different molecules belonging to dystrophin family products or associated proteins in reference to vertebrate muscle. (A–J) In each set, a second specific fluorescent antibody (Cy3 or fluorescein, selectively linked to an anti-mouse or anti-rabbit antibody, respectively) was used for immunolocalization of each specific protein. The superimposed images are shown in the right panel of each set. The left panel is always related to dystrophin, excluding set E which is related to a 90-kD protein analyzed in the present study. Each set is identified by a letter and corresponds to the potential co-localization of dystrophin (left, DYS) and, in the middle panels, (A) DRP2, dystrophin-related protein Type 2, (B) {alpha}-dystrobrevin, {alpha}-brev, (C) ß-dystroglycan, ß-dystro, (D) {alpha}-syntrophin, {alpha}-syntro, (F) {alpha}-sarcoglycan, {alpha}-sarco, (G) ß-sarcoglycan, ß-sarco, (H) {gamma}-sarcoglycan, {gamma}-sarco, (I) {delta}-sarcoglycan, {delta}-sarco, and (J) sarcospan, sarcospan. (E) Left panel corresponds to a new protein with Mr 90 kD (90K) and the middle panel corresponds to ß-dystroglycan (ß-dystro). Bars = 50 µm.



View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Confocal analyses of slow-type muscle fibers from T. marmorata with different antibodies related to dystrophin family products or dystrophin-associated proteins. As in Fig 1, comparative analyses were undertaken on red muscle fibers. Cross-sections (10 µm) were viewed using antibodies against different molecules belonging to dystrophin family products or associated proteins in reference to vertebrate muscle. (A–J) In each set, a second specific fluorescent antibody (Cy3 or fluorescein, selectively linked to an anti-mouse or anti-rabbit antibody, respectively) was used for immunolocalization of each specific protein. The superimposed images shown in the right panel of each set. The left panel is always related to dystrophin, excluding set E, which is related to a 90-kD protein which was analyzed in the present study. Abbreviations as in Fig 1. Bars = 50 µm.

These confocal microscopic observations are illustrated in the right panel of each set, corresponding to the superimposed images, which gave a clear yellow color when there was co-localization but only a pale orange color when the associated protein was not found at the muscle cell membrane. These results are summarized in Table 1, in which we comparatively present the membrane distribution in white muscle (fast type) and red muscle (slow type) for each member of the dystrophin complex.


 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Comparative distribution at the muscle membrane of a few dystrophin complex-related proteins in the different muscle types analyzed

To obtain more information in these comparative immunodetections, we confirmed the presence of the molecule analyzed in crude white (W) and red (R) muscle extracts.

Western Blotting Analyses
Crude protein extracts from T. marmorata slow-type and fast-type fibers were transferred to nitrocellulose sheets and incubated respectively with each antibody reported above. Whereas no clear result was obtained with {alpha}-dystrobrevin, {gamma}-sarcoglycan, and sarcospan, the specific antibodies presented in Fig 3 showed that (as expected) dystrophin (400-kD protein band), ß-dystroglycan (43-kD protein band), and {alpha}-sarcoglycan (50-kD protein band) were detectable in both fast (W) and slow (R) muscles.



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Western blot analysis of crude extracts from different T. marmorata muscles. Only monoclonal antibodies against dystrophin (5A3) and the 90-kD protein (13E2), and polyclonal antibodies that we produced were used in these Western blotting analyses. Crude protein extracts from W (white) fast-type fibers and R (red) slow-type fibers were analyzed by incubation with the primary antibody indicated at the top of the corresponding lanes. DYS, dystrophin; DRP2, dystrophin-related protein Type 2; ß-dystro, ß-dystrophin; {alpha}-syntro, {alpha}-syntrophin; {alpha}-sarco, {alpha} sarcoglycan; ß-sarco, ß-sarcoglycan; {delta}-sarco, {delta}-sarcoglycan; 90K, protein with Mr of 90 kD assume to correspond to Ao; C, control, in which the first specific antibody was omitted. Molecular weights are indicated at left. In the control lane, separation of the same extracts on SDS-PAGE stained with Coomassie brillant blue enabled estimation of the actin content.

Fast muscle fibers from Torpedo contained {alpha}-syntrophin (59-kD) but appeared to be depleted of DRP2 and both ß- and {delta}-sarcoglycan. There was also a 90-kD protein (called 90k) in crude protein extracts from white muscles, i.e., detected with monoclonal antibody 13E2 that we produced and which is assumed to correspond to the Ao protein reported by Yoshida and Ozawa 1990 .

Slow muscle fibers from Torpedo were found to contain DRP2 (120-kD) and ß-sarcoglycan (43 kD). {delta}-sarcoglycan appeared to be present but with an apparent migration of about 37 kD, as compared to 35–31 kD in mammalian muscles. No {alpha}-syntrophin or 90-kD protein was detected in Western blots.

In addition to these positive or negative detections, it was also possible to estimate the relative amount of proteins present in both muscle types. We have presented here a preliminary attempt at Western blotting quantification. The densitometric measurements enabled us to estimate that the relative OD levels were different in red (slow) and white (fast) Torpedo muscle. This corresponded to the presence of dystrophin (125%), ß-dystroglycan (110%), and {alpha}-sarcoglycan (160%) at higher levels in Torpedo slow-type fibers.

Immunoprecipitation
Comparative analyses of proteins specifically immunoprecipitated with anti-ß-dystroglycan polyclonal antibody and then retained on a protein A–Sepharose column are presented in Fig 4. The use of anti-ß-dystroglycan revealed in both enriched membrane-eluted fractions from white and red Torpedo muscles the presence of the expected proteins, such as ß-dystroglycan, but also dystrophin. Similarly, {alpha}-sarcoglycan was detected in both membrane fractions, whereas DRP2 and {delta}-sarcoglycan proteins were found only in red muscle extracts. In contrast, only the white muscle-eluted fraction contained {alpha}-syntrophin.



View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Western blotting analysis of immunoprecipitation fractions from the enriched membrane muscle preparation. Enriched membrane extracts from W (white) and R (red) Torpedo muscles were incubated with anti-ß-dystroglycan. After immunoprecipitation with anti-ß-dystroglycan and elution on a protein A–Sepharose column, the resulting fractions (eluted by 10% SDS) were analyzed by Western blotting. We revealed in these aliquots the presence or absence of some component of the DGC by treating the corresponding nitrocellulose sheets with specific antibodies indicated at left: ß-dystro, ß-dystrophin; Dys, dystrophin; DRP2, dystrophin-related protein Type 2; {alpha}-sarco, {alpha}-sarcoglycan; {delta}-sarco, {delta}-sarcoglycan; {alpha}-syntro, {alpha}-syntrophin.


  Discussion
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

We comparatively investigated the composition of dystrophin-associated proteins from red and white caudal muscles in Torpedo marmorata. This was undertaken first to visualize the presence of this protein system at the fish muscle membrane and then to compare the expression pattern according to the muscle fiber type analyzed. We intended to establish, in the light of increasing knowledge on the number of molecules constituting dystrophin-associated protein complex, a catalogue of dystrophin family proteins that exist in slow- and fast-type muscle fibers from fish (which are similar in terms of myosin presence as tested with a monoclonal antibody directed specifically against slow fiber type muscles from mammals and which gave cytoplasmic staining only in red Torpedo muscle; not shown).

With the monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies against dystrophin and/or utrophin used in this study, we identified two proteins in white and red muscles of Torpedo: a 400-kD protein band corresponding to Torpedo dystrophin and utrophin proteins and a 116-kD protein band that corresponded to a short Torpedo dystrophin/utrophin family product (referred to as DRP2). These proteins have already been described in the T. marmorata electric organ (Cartaud et al. 1993 ; Fabbrizio et al. 1993 ; Rivier et al. 1996 ) confined to the innervated surface of the electroplate (Chang et al. 1989 ; Yeadon et al. 1991 ). Different authors' studies of dystrophin-associated proteins in the electric organ of T. marmorata revealed some discrepancies regarding mammalian descriptions. Torpedo syntrophin was identified in the electric organ as a single protein highly homologous to {alpha}-syntrophin (Wagner and Huganir 1994 ). In this study, we described the {alpha}-syntrophin only in Torpedo white muscle. Dystroglycan in Torpedo electric organ consists of 190-kD and 43-kD proteins (Cartaud et al. 1993 ). In white and red muscles, with the polyclonal antibodies that we produced, ß-dystroglycan was detected with a molecular weight of 43 kD, i.e., similar to the molecule described in mammalian muscle. In Torpedo electric organ, two sarcoglycans of 45 and 30 kD have been described that may correspond to ß- and {gamma}-sarcoglycan (Cartaud et al. 1993 ; Fabbrizio et al. 1997 ). Our Western blotting results showed that {alpha}-sarcoglycan was detected in both muscles studied, but ß- and {delta}-sarcoglycan appeared only in red muscle. Finally, the 90-kD protein that was present in electric organ, in accordance with Yoshida and Ozawa 1990 , was detected only in white muscle cell membranes.

These differences between Torpedo electric organ and two kinds of Torpedo muscles might be explained by the fact that Torpedo electric organ is embryonically derived from immature striated muscle (Fox and Richardson 1978 ). However, we report marked differences between white (fast-type fibers) and red (slow-type fibers) skeletal muscles. A summary of these comparative distributions is presented in Table 1. These two muscles are located in the caudal part of the fish but have different functions. In the past 10 years, previous studies partially revealed that cell and fiber distributions are interesting to study with respect to dystrophin (Howard et al. 1999 ). Studies on fast- and slow-twitch mammalian skeletal muscles (Anh et al. 1992 ) have revealed that dystrophin content is approximately twofold higher in soleus muscle (a slow-type muscle) than in vastus lateralis (a fast-type muscle). Quantitative analysis of some partners of the dystrophin complex, such as dystrophin, ß-dystroglycan, and {gamma}-sarcoglycan, increased by about 130%, 110%, and 120% in rat soleus muscle (Chopard et al. 2000 ). Our preliminary results are in close agreement with the above quantitative data corresponding to dystrophin and ß-dystroglycan overexpression in slow-type muscles. {gamma}-Sarcoglycan was not quantified in this work, but we observed significant overexpression (160%) for {alpha}-sarcoglycan in slow-type muscles. Recently, Straub et al. 1999 hypothesized that the novel {epsilon}-sarcoglycan might replace {alpha}-sarcoglycan in smooth muscle but participate in the skeletal muscle dystrophin complex, as reported recently by Hack et al. 2000 . This point might be interesting to investigate in slow- and fast-type muscle fibers from Torpedo in relationship to data obtained on {alpha}-sarcoglycan abundance in slow-type fibers.

Rafael et al. 2000 , working with the dystrophin/utrophin-deficient dko mouse, obtained another interesting result. They found that the structural and biochemical properties of skeletal muscle (i.e., fiber type determination) were clearly under the influence of dystrophin and utrophin. In mammalian muscle, dystrophin and associated proteins link the extracellular matrix and the subsarcolemmal actin cytoskeleton, and deficiencies or variations in these proteins can generate different muscular pathologies, such as limb–girdle muscular dystrophies, that correspond mainly to sarcoglycan deficiency (Bushby 1999 ). The difference in the composition of the dystrophin-associated proteins complex could be related to the different structural and function properties in two muscle types. In Torpedo fish, we found significant differences between the two muscles. Red muscle is made up of short but abundant fibers that confer high strength to this muscle. White muscle has long fibers forming a propulsion organ that, by strong undulatory movements, plays a major role in fish locomotion. In red muscle, the dystrophin, ß-dystroglycan, {alpha}-sarcoglycan complex, including DRP2, ß-sarcoglycan, {delta}-sarcoglycan, {gamma}-sarcoglycan with sarcospan and {alpha}-dystrobrevin, might be related to the high-strength capacity of this muscle and the absent {alpha}-syntrophin might be replaced by other proteins of the syntrophin family (ß or {gamma} isoform). In white muscle, {alpha}-syntrophin in complex with dystrophin/utrophin, {alpha}-sarcoglycan, and {gamma}-sarcoglycan might be important for the fish undulatory movement, while the absence of DRP2, ß-sarcoglycan, {delta}-sarcoglycan, and {alpha}-dystrobrevin might be compensated for the presence of a 90-kD protein and/or other proteins from the dystrobrevin family. Then, in reference to the work cited above (Rafael et al. 2000 ), we assumed that the presence of DRP2 in fish muscle might influence the fiber type.

To our knowledge, the present study is a rather broad investigation on dystrophin family products present in two different muscle types from the Torpedo caudal region. Due to the loss of the vasoconstrictor response regulation and eventual muscle damage that now appears to be correlated with dystrophin deficiency (Sanders et al. 2000 ; Crosbie 2001 ), it should be noted that a well-known difference between muscles is that red muscles are richer in capillary beds compared to white muscles (Romunal 1965 ). This study highlighted the interdependence between the dystrophin family system composition and the muscle type contractile performances (in connection with vascular control), which will be of interest for further study.


  Acknowledgments

Supported in part by grants from INSERM and the Association Française contre les Myopathies (AFM). RM was a Consejo Social University of Alcalá and INSERM postdoctoral fellow over the course of this work.

We are very grateful to Nicole Lautrédou–Audouy for granting access to the confocal microscope at the Centre de Recherche en Imagerie Cellulaire (CRIC, Montpellier, France). We are also grateful to the fisherman Jacques Lapeyre, who provided us with the live fish.

Received for publication November 9, 2000; accepted February 12, 2001.


  Literature Cited
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Ahn AH, Feener Ca Gussoni E, Yoshida M, Ozawa E, Kunkel LM (1996) The three human syntrophin genes are expressed in diverse tissues, have distinct chromosomal localizations, and each bind to dystrophin and its relatives. J Biol Chem 271:2724-2730[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Anh M, Kim H, Rogers PA (1992) Quantitative analysis of dystrophin in fast- and slow-twitch mammalian skeletal muscle. FEBS Lett 304:187-191[Medline]

Araishi K, Sasaoka T, Imamura M, Noguchi S, Hama H, Wakabayashi E, Yoshida M, Hori T, Ozawa E (1999) Loss of the sarcoglycan complex and sarcospan leads to muscular dystrophy in ß-sarcoglycan-deficient mice. Hum Mol Genet 8:1589-1598[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bushby K (1999) The limb-girdle muscular dystrophies—multiple genes, multiple mechanisms. Hum Mol Genet 8:1875-1882[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cartaud A, Stretzkowski–Marden F, Cartaud J (1993) Identification of dystrophin-binding protein(s) in membrane from Torpedo electrocyte and rat muscle. J Biol Chem 268:13019-13022[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chang HW, Bock E, Bonilla E (1989) Dystrophin in electric organ of Torpedo californica homologous to that in human muscle. J Biol Chem 264:20831-20834[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chopard A, Pons F, Charpiot P, Marini JF (2000) Quantitative analysis protein contents by Western-blotting: comparison of three members of the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex in slow and fast rat skeletal muscle. Electrophoresis 21:517-522[Medline]

Cohn RD, Campbell KP (2000) Molecular basis of muscular dystrophies. Muscle Nerve 23:1456-1471[Medline]

Crosbie RH (2001) No vascular control in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Nature Med 7:27-29[Medline]

Crosbie RH, Heighway J, Venzke DP, Lee JC, Campbell KP (1997) Sarcospan, the 25-kDa transmembrane component of the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex. J Biol Chem 272:31221-31224[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Deys KA, Bowe MA, Leszyk JD, Fallon JR (1995) The {alpha}-dystroglycan-ß-dystroglycan complex: membrane organisation and relationship to an agrin receptor. J Biol Chem 270:25956-25959[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fabbrizio E, Leger J, Anoal M, Leger JJ, Mornet D (1993) Monoclonal antibodies targeted against the C-terminal domain of dystrophin or utrophin. FEBS Lett 322:10-14[Medline]

Fabbrizio E, Nudel U, Hugon G, Robert A, Pons F, Mornet D (1994) Characterization and localization of a 77 kD protein related to the dystrophin gene family. Biochem J 299:359-365[Medline]

Fabbrizio E, Rivier F, Bonet–Kerrache A, Robert A, Echenne B, Rendon A, Hugon G, Mornet D (1997) Dystrophin superfamily complexes are different in muscle and the nervous system. J Peripheral Nerv Syst 2:133-142[Medline]

Fox GQ, Richardson GP (1978) The developmental morphology of Torpedo marmorata electric organ—myogenic phase. J Comp Neurol 179:677-698[Medline]

Hack AA, Lam MY, Cordier L, Shoturma DI, Ly CT, Hadhazy MA, Hadhazy MR, Sweeney HL, McNally EM (2000) Differential requirement for individual sarcoglycans and dystrophin in the assembly and function of the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex. J Cell Sci 113:2535-2544[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hoffman EP, Brown RH, Kunkel LM (1987) Dystrophin: the protein product of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy locus. Cell 51:509-517

Howard PL, Dally GY, Ditta SD, Austin RC, Worton RG, Klamut HJ, Ray PN (1999) Dystrophin isoforms Dp71 and Dp427 have distinct roles in myogenic cells. Muscle Nerve 22:16-27[Medline]

Ibraghimov–Beskrovnaya O, Ervasti JM, Leveille CJ, Slaughter CA, Sernett SW, Campbell KP (1992) Primary structure of dystrophin-associated glycoproteins linking dystrophin to the extracellular matrix. Nature 355:696-702[Medline]

McNally EM, Ly CT, Kunkel LM (1998) Human {epsilon}-sarcoglycan is higly related to {alpha}-sarcoglycan (adhalin), the limb girdle muscular dystrophy 2D gene. FEBS Lett 422:27-32[Medline]

Menke A, Jockusch H (1995) Extent of shock-induced membrane leakage in human and mouse myotubes depends on dystrophin. J Cell Sci 108:727-733[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nigro V, Piluso G, Belsito A, Politano L, Püca AA, Papparella S, Rossi E, Viglietto G, Esposito MG, Abbondanza C, Medici N, Molinari AM, Nigro G, Puca GA (1996) Identification of a novel sarcoglycan gene at 5q33 encoding a sarcolemmal 35 kDa glycoprotein. Hum Mol Genet 5:1179-1186[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pasternak C, Wong S, Elson EL (1995) Mechanical function of dystrophin in muscle cells. J Cell Biol 128:355-361[Abstract]

Piluso G, Mirabella M, Ricci E, Belsito A, Abbondanza C, Servidai S, Puca AA, Tonali P, Puca GA, Nigro V (2000) {gamma}1- and {gamma}2-syntrophins, two novel dystrophin-binding proteins localized in neuronal cells. J Biol Chem 275:15851-15860[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pons F, Augier N, Heilig R, Leger J, Mornet D (1990) Isolated dystrophin molecules as seen by electron microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:7851-7855[Abstract]

Pons F, Robert A, Fabbrizio E, Hugon G, Califano JPC, Fehrentz JA, Martinez J, Mornet D (1994) Utrophin localization in normal and dystrophin-deficient heart. Circulation 90:369-374[Abstract]

Rafael JA, Towsend ER, Squire SE, Potter AC, Chamberlain JS, Davies KE (2000) Dystrophin and utrophin influence fiber type composition and post-synaptic membrane structure. Hum Mol Genet 9:1357-1367[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rivier F, Echenne B, Chaix Y, Robert A, Delisle MB, Calvas P, Mornet D (2000) Perturbation in dystrophin-associated glycoprotein complex in a boy with Becker muscular dystrophy. Brain Development 22:65-68[Medline]

Rivier F, Robert A, Hugon G, Bonet–Kerrache A, Nigro V, Fehrentz J, Martinez J, Mornet D (1999a) Dystrophin and utrophin complexed with different associated proteins in cardiac Purkinje fibres. Histochem J 31:425-432[Medline]

Rivier F, Robert A, Latouche J, Hugon G, Mornet D (1996) Presence of long and short dystrophin and/or utrophin products in Torpedo marmorata peripheral nerves. FEBS Lett 378:272-276[Medline]

Rivier F, Robert A, Royuela M, Hugon G, Bonet–Kerrache A, Mornet D (1999b) Utrophin and dystrophin-associated glycoproteins in normal and dystrophin deficient cardiac muscle. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 20:305-314[Medline]

Romunal FCA (1965) Capillary supply and metabolism of muscle fibers. Arch Neurol 11:355-372

Royuela M, Paniagua R, Rivier F, Hugon G, Robert A, Mornet D (1999) Presence of invertebrate dystrophin-like products in obliquely striate muscle of the leech, Pontobdella muricata (annelida, Hirudinea). Histochem J 31:603-608[Medline]

Sanders M, Chavoshan B, Harris SA, Iannaconne ST, Stull JT, Thomas GD, Victor RG (2000) Functional muscle ischemia in neuronal nitric oxide synthase-deficient skeletal muscle of children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:13616-13623

Straub V, Ettinger QJ, Durbeej M, Venzke DP, Cutshall S, Sanes JR, Campbell KP (1999) {epsilon}-Sarcoglycan replaces {alpha}-sarcoglycan in smooth muscle to form a unique dystrophin-glycoprotein complex. J Biol Chem 274:27989-27996[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wagner KR, Huganir RL (1994) Tyrosine and serine phosphorylation of dystrophin and the 58 kDa protein in the postsynaptic membrane of Torpedo electric organ. J Neurochem 62:1947-1952[Medline]

Wang J, Pansky A, Venuti J, Yaffe D, Nudel U (1998) A sea urchin gene encoding dystrophin-related proteins. Hum Mol Genet 7:581-588[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yeadon JE, Lin H, Dyer SM, Burden SJ (1991) Dystrophin is a component of the subsynaptic membrane. J Cell Biol 115:1069-1076[Abstract]

Yoshida M, Ozawa E (1990) Glycoprotein complex anchoring dystrophin to sarcolemma. J Biochem 108:748-752[Abstract]





This Article
Abstract
Full Text (PDF)
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Citation Map
Services
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Articles by Royuela, M.
Articles by Mornet, D.
Articles citing this Article
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Royuela, M.
Articles by Mornet, D.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]