Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, Vol. 50, 641-650, May 2002, Copyright © 2002, The Histochemical Society, Inc.


ARTICLE

Differences in Postmortem Stability of Sex Steroid Receptor Immunoreactivity in Rat Brain

Mariann Fodora,b, Fred W. van Leeuwena, and Dick F. Swaaba
a Netherlands Institute for Brain Research & Graduate School Neurosciences Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
b Research Institute for Endocrinology, Reproduction and Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Correspondence to: Mariann Fodor, Dept. of Pediatrics, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: fodor@vumc.nl


  Summary
Top
Summary
Introduction
Material and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Difficulties in demonstrating sex steroid receptors in the human brain by immunohistochemistry (IHC) may depend on postmortem delay and a long fixation time. The effect of different postmortem times was therefore studied in rat brain kept in the skull at room temperature for 0, 6, or 24 hr after death. After a long fixation for 20 days, hypothalami were embedded in paraffin and sections were immunohistochemically stained for androgen receptor (AR), estrogen receptor-{alpha} (ER), or progesterone receptor (PR). Retrieving the antigenic sites by microwave pretreatment was essential to obtain successful IHC in all groups studied. In general, immunoreactivity was restricted to the cell nuclei. However, the intensity of the staining appeared to be strongly dependent on the different receptor antigens and postmortem time. Both AR and ER but not PR immunoreactivity were decreased after immersion-fixation compared to the perfused sections at time point zero. In brains fixed by immersion, all three receptors decreased gradually with increasing postmortem time, and ER became hardly detectable after 24 hr postmortem. The results of these experiments show that, with the protocol used, postmortem variables and lengthy fixation do not, in principle, prevent sex steroid receptor IHC in human material. The outcome of the immunostaining, however, might be strongly dependent on the epitopes and/or antibody used. (J Histochem Cytochem 50:641–649, 2002)

Key Words: estrogen receptor-{alpha}, androgen receptor, progesterone receptor, immunohistochemistry, postmortem delay, rat


  Introduction
Top
Summary
Introduction
Material and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

THE GONADAL STEROID HORMONES testosterone, estrogens, and progesterone play a critical role in the structural and functional development of the central nervous system, resulting, e.g., in sex differences in sexual and reproductive behavior and neuroendocrine processes. Sex steroids mediate their function by binding to the appropriate intracellular receptors that belong to the superfamily of ligand-responsive transcription factors (Evans 1988 ; Diamond et al. 1990 ). The neuroanatomic distribution of sex steroid receptors has been extensively mapped by immunohistochemistry in the brain of various species, including songbirds (Gahr 1990 ), rat (Cintra et al. 1986 ), guinea pig (Warembourg et al. 1989 ; DonCarlos et al. 1991 ), Brazilian opossum (Fox et al. 1991 ; Iqbal et al. 1995 ), ferret (Sisk and DonCarlos 1995 ), hamster (Li et al. 1993 ), domestic pig (Van Leeuwen et al. 1995 ), sheep (Lehman et al. 1993 ; Herbison 1995 ) and monkey (Bethea et al. 1992 ; Michael et al. 1995 ; Wu et al. 1995 ; Thind and Goldsmith 1997 ). However, comparable data for the human brain are limited. Immunohistochemical studies on human material are believed to be hampered by a rapid postmortem degradation of the receptor and the negative effect of a long-lasting fixation procedure of the autopsy material (Press and Greene 1984 ; Brolin et al. 1992 ; Puy et al. 1995 ). Moreover, most tissue is embedded in paraffin after a number of tough treatments. Because recent papers have described steroid receptor immunoreactivity in the hypothalamus (Donahue et al. 2000 ; Fernandez-Guasti et al. 2000 ; Ishunina et al. 2000 ; Ishunina and Swaab 2001 ; Kruijver et al. 2001 ), we wondered how important these parameters really are.

The effect of postmortem delay on steroid receptors is strongly dependent on the technique used to visualize them. In spite of the labile receptor binding properties of corticosteroids during a postmortem period of 3–4.5 hr (Sapolsky and Meaney 1988 ), postmortem stability of the mRNAs for glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptors was found for 12–24 hr after death using in situ hybridization histochemistry (Wetzel et al. 1994 ). However, as far as the immunohistochemical visualization of sex steroid receptors was concerned no parametric data were available. To clarify the effect of postmortem delay, we have therefore systematically tested the stability of various sex steroid receptors using immunohistochemistry in the rat hypothalamus and adjacent structures obtained within 0–24 hr after death and fixed for 20 days, as is commonly done in human studies.


  Material and Methods
Top
Summary
Introduction
Material and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Animals and Tissue Preparation
Male Wistar rats were purchased from Harlan CPB (Zeist, The Netherlands). All aspects of animal care and treatment were carried out according to the local guidelines of the experimental animal care committee (No. 95.19/00). Rats weighing 200 ± 20 g (n=20) were sacrificed by decapitation and the brains were either removed immediately (n=5) or left in the skull for 6 (n=5) or 24 h (n=5) at room temperature (RT). For comparison, five intact animals were deeply anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (0.1 ml/100 g body weight) and perfused through the ascending aorta with 50 ml of physiological saline, followed by 300 ml of fixative containing 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.4. All groups were then treated as described below. After a postmortem delay of 0, 6, or 24 hr the brains were removed from the skull and postfixed for 20 days in 4% paraformaldehyde solution in 0.1 M PBS at 4C. The forebrains were processed for routine paraffin (Histowax) embedding. Coronal sections (8 µm) were cut, mounted on 3-amynopropyltriethoxisilane-coated slides (Menzel; Darmstadt, Germany) to prevent detachment due to the high temperature during antigen retrieval treatment. Antigen retrieval was performed by microwave oven heating according to Shi et al. 1993 . After deparaffinization and rehydration, the slides were placed in a jar filled with 0.01 M citrate buffer (pH 6.0) and heated in a microwave oven, three times for 5 min at 700 W. The sections were allowed to cool down to RT. Meanwhile, adjacent sections were left in citrate buffer at RT to verify the effect of the microwave treatment.

Immunohistochemistry
After rehydration, the sections were first rinsed extensively with PBS and incubated overnight in one of the primary antibodies diluted in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 0.05 M Tris, 0.5 M NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100, and 0.1% sodium azide, pH 7.6, at 4C. The primary antibodies included PG 21 (1:500) (gift of Geoffrey Greene, University of Chicago), which is a rabbit polyclonal androgen receptor (AR) antibody directed at the first 21 amino acids at the N-terminus of the rat/human AR (Prins et al. 1991 ; Zhou et al. 1994 ), 1D5 (1:50) (DAKO; Glostrup, Denmark), which is a mouse monoclonal estrogen receptor-alpha (ER{alpha}) antibody raised against amino acids 118–140 in the A/B domain of the human ER (Al Saati et al. 1993 ), or a polyclonal progesterone receptor (PR) antibody (1:500) (DAKO), which was made against amino acids 533–547 in the DNA-binding domain of the rat/human PR (Traish and Wotiz 1990 ). After several washes in TBS, sections were incubated with biotinylated secondary antisera (biotinylated anti-rabbit IgG for AR, PR and biotinylated anti-mouse IgG for ER, 1:250 in TBS; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for 1.5 hr at RT. This was followed by a 1-hr incubation at RT with avidin–biotin–peroxidase (1:400; ABC Elite Kit, Vector Laboratories). Tissue-bound peroxidase was visualized with the 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB) chromogen reaction intensified with nickel–ammonium sulfate (7.5 mg DAB, 300 mg nickel–ammonium sulfate, 5 µl 30% H2O2 in 15 ml 0.05 M Tris-HCl buffer (TRIS), pH 7.6) for 6–15 min at RT. Sections were then rinsed in distilled water, dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol, cleared in xylene, and coverslipped with Entellan (Merck; Darmstadt, Germany). Alternate sections were stained with thionin for orientation.

Quantitative Analysis
To determine the postmortem effects in the staining intensity of AR/ER/PR-containing neurons, immunoreactivity was evaluated by optical density measurements. Brain regions rich in a given receptor subtype were studied, including the lateral septum (AR), arcuate nucleus (ER, PR), and medial preoptic nucleus in which all three receptors (AR, ER, PR) were present. Two sections per cell group per animal were analyzed for a total of 100 sections using an IBAS image analysis system (Kontron Instruments; Munich, Germany). Sections were viewed under brightfield illumination with a Zeiss Axioplan microscope with a SONY CCD XC-77CE black-and-white camera. Gain and black level of the camera were fixed. A place outside the tissue was chosen for 100% transmission (gray level 255).

The same illumination and analog settings were used during acquisition and analysis of all images. The gray values per pixel were transformed into optical density (OD) per pixel and average OD per cell was measured. For each cell group from each animal, OD readings from two sections (20 cells) were summed. To analyze background staining, five OD readings per section were taken from a cell-sized area of neuropil in the vicinity of labeled neurons.

The differences between the intensity of the immunohistochemical staining for each time point was analyzed by ANOVA tests. Differences were considered statistically significant at p<0.05.


  Results
Top
Summary
Introduction
Material and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Paraffin-embedded sections of rat forebrain showed specific nuclear labeling for all three sex steroid receptors studied, in spite of the long fixation period of 20 days. However, for visualization of the immunoreactivity microwave irradiation was essential. An example is given in Fig 1, in which the lateral septum (AR-containing region) and the neighboring caudate putamen complex (AR-negative region) are shown. In general, sections without microwave pretreatment showed nonspecific reaction in the ependymal layer of the ventricular system, high background, and absence of specific nuclear staining all over the section (Fig 1A), in contrast to the microwave-pretreated sections, in which specific nuclear staining became visible only in the expected area and the ependymal staining disappeared (Fig 1B).



View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Androgen receptor immunohistochemical staining of the ventral part of the lateral septum (LSv) in rat brain that was immediately fixed by immersion (A,B) or left intact in the skull for 6 hr (C) or 24 hr (D) after decapitation. Without microwave pretreatment (M-) no positive immunostaining was visible (A). Moreover, strong background staining occurred, especially in the ependymal layer of the ventricular system (arrow). Microwave treatment (M+) resulted in positive nuclear immunostaining independently of the postmortem time (B–D). However, there was a slight decrease in the immunoreactivity 1 day after decapitation (D). Drawing indicates the area investigated. CP, caudate putamen. Bars = 100 µm.

Androgen Receptor Immunoreactivity
Cells containing AR immunoreactivity were widely distributed throughout the intact rat forebrain. The highest number of cells was found in the lateral septum (Fig 1), the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, amygdala, medial preoptic area, and the hypothalamic ventromedial, arcuate, and premamillary nuclei. Immunopositivity was restricted to the cell nuclei as was shown previously in immunohistochemical staining in the gonad-intact male (Wood and Newman 1993 ). The subcellular localization was not affected by postmortem time. One-way ANOVA revealed significant effects in the medial preoptic nucleus (F=10.229; p<0.001) and the lateral septum (F=7.148; p<0.003). However, in the brains fixed immediately by perfusion (not shown) or immersion (Fig 1B) there was no visible difference in the distribution pattern or the intensity of the immunoreactivity (Table 1). After 6- and 24-hr postmortem delay the intensity of the immunostaining was reduced noticeably (Table 1). However, neither the background nor the distribution pattern changed significantly (Fig 1C and Fig 1D; Table 1). No significant differences in the two areas measured were observed at various time points (Table 1).


 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Optical density readings after different postmortem times (in hr)a

Estrogen Receptor Immunoreactivity
ER immunoreactivity was distributed as previously described (Cintra et al. 1986 ). Dense populations of ER-positive neurons were found in the medial preoptic nucleus (Fig 2), bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, and arcuate and ventromedial nuclei. The staining was confined to the cell nuclei independently of the postmortem delay. Nevertheless, the intensity of immunohistochemical staining was dependent on the type of fixation. At time point zero the intensity of immunoreactivity in the transcardially perfused material (Fig 2A) was superb compared to the non-perfused immersion-fixed tissue (Fig 2B). Although the distribution pattern was identical, immersion-fixation resulted in noticeably decreased immunoreactivity in all regions. The nuclear staining was more intense and homogeneous in the perfused animals (Fig 2A) compared to the immersion-fixed sections, in which a decrease in immunoreactivity was visible to various degrees in the positive nuclei (Fig 2B). Signal was still detectable after 6 hr at variable intensities (Fig 2C), but after a 24-hr delay ER immunoreactivity was hardly visible (Fig 2D). The diminution of the staining was confirmed by the OD measurements (Table 1), and ANOVA revealed significant effects on the medial preoptic nucleus and arcuate nucleus (F=8.135 and 8.722; p<0.002). No significant difference was measured for the two nuclei analyzed at various time points. Prolonged chromogen reaction did not result in enhancement of the specific staining but instead caused nonspecific reaction in the cytoplasm of neurons in the supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei, all cortical layers, and glial cells in the optic tract (not shown).



View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Representative photomicrographs of estrogen receptor immunopositivity in the intact male rat. Medial preoptic area from brain fixed by perfusion (A) or by immersion (B) immediately (0 hr), 6 hr (C), and 24 hr (D) after decapitation. Note the gradually decreasing stability of the immunohistochemistry (A–D). The staining is confined to the cell nuclei, but is almost indistinguishable from background staining 1 day after decapitation. pm, postmortem. Bar = 50 µm.

Progesterone Receptor Immunoreactivity
At time point zero, PR immunoreactivity was observed in cell nuclei of neurons in the preoptic area and mediobasal hypothalamus (Fig 3) as previously described (Warembourg et al. 1989 ; Bethea et al. 1992 ). No significant difference in the distribution pattern or the number of immunopositive nuclei was seen between the perfused and immersion-fixed groups at time point zero (Fig 3A and Fig 3B). However, the intensity of the PR immunoreactivity was dramatically reduced by approximately 30%, in brains left for 6 hr at RT (Fig 3C). Very weak immunostaining was still detectable after 24 hr in virtually all regions in the cell nuclei (Fig 3D). In a small number of cells, however, we did find stronger immunostaining. In these cells the chromatin appeared to be looser and immunoreactivity also appeared in the cytoplasm (Fig 3D). One-way ANOVA showed significant effects of postmortem time in the medial preoptic nucleus (F=65,202; p<0.001) and arcuate nucleus (F=22,265; p<0.005). No significant difference was measured in the two regions analyzed at various postmortem time points.



View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Progesterone receptor-containing neurons in the male rat hypothalamus fixed for 20 days, pretreated with microwave irradiation and immunostained with the Dako antibody. The medial preoptic area from brains fixed by perfusion (A) or by immersion immediately (B), 6 hr (C), or 24 hr (D) after decapitation. Single intensively stained nuclei and cytoplasm containing progesterone receptor are visible in the medial preoptic area 1 day after decapitation (D). Inset indicates the area investigated (asterisk). pm, postmortem. Bar = 50 µm.


  Discussion
Top
Summary
Introduction
Material and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

This is the first report evaluating postmortem effects on sex steroid receptor immunohistochemistry in paraffin-embedded rat brain. In recent years, several studies have indicated that immunohistochemical demonstration of sex steroid receptors in the brain of different species, including humans, is feasible. The descriptive studies in mammalian brain, with one exception (Okamura et al. 1992 ), have been carried out in perfused floating material or frozen specimen (Cintra et al. 1986 ; Warembourg et al. 1989 ; DonCarlos et al. 1991 ; Fox et al. 1991 ; Bethea et al. 1992 ; Lehman et al. 1993 ; Li et al. 1993 ; Iqbal et al. 1995 ; Michael et al. 1995 ; Sisk and DonCarlos 1995 ; Van Leeuwen et al. 1995 ; Thind and Goldsmith 1997 ; Shughrue and Merchenthaler 2001 ). In contrast, the majority of the human studies available, because of the aforementioned practical reasons, were done mostly on paraffin-embedded material (Puy et al. 1995 ; Fernandez-Guasti et al. 2000 ; Ishunina et al. 2000 ; Taylor and Al-Azzawi 2000 ; Ishunina and Swaab 2001 ; Kruijver et al. 2001 ). Regardless of the species and tissue processing, the majority of these reports agreed that the duration of the (post)fixation time and the intensity of the immunoreactivity were inversely correlated because of epitope masking caused by the aldehyde-containing fixatives. It was also reported that the optimal staining on free-floating material could be obtained from brains that were shortly perfused and postfixed for only a few hours.

For systematic, retrospective, and quantitative work on the human brain, however, the most convenient way to collect brain material is to embed the tissue block in paraffin after appropriate fixation. Experimental animals are mostly transcardially perfused with the fixative, whereas human autopsy material is usually immersion-fixed. Working with human tissue usually involves additional unfavorable factors such as the variable postmortem delay, no perfusion, and therefore inadequate fixation because fixation of the outer parts of the tissue blocks forms a barrier. As a consequence, a longer fixation time is necessary for the larger human brain structures (Swaab 1997 ), which may critically affect the preservation of sex steroid receptors. In addition, antemortem events in the brain, such as hypoxia and chronic disease, or the use of medications (Erkut et al. 1998 ) may exert an important influence on a number of neurochemical parameters. Moreover, mRNA preservation, enzyme activities, and neurotransmitter and neuropeptide concentrations have all been shown to vary significantly with varying agonal state (Spokes 1979 ; Perry et al. 1982 ; Hardy et al. 1985 ).

The aim of our study was to see whether postmortem delay, independently of other factors, might affect sex steroid receptor immunohistochemistry. For that purpose we used intact adult male rats because we wanted to avoid cyclic changes in the hormonal milieu.

To detect the steroid receptor proteins in the paraffin-embedded rat brain it was necessary to pretreat the samples to open the tissue matrix and to minimize the crosslinkage caused by the aldehyde fixative (Shi et al. 2001 ). Previous qualitative studies on steroid receptor-positive carcinomas showed the superiority of microwave pretreatment over other "unmasking" techniques such as enzyme digestion (Shi et al. 1993 ; Szekeres et al. 1994 ). Therefore, we chose to microwave the sections in citrate buffer at pH 6. Without this pretreatment no immunostaining was observed, most probably due to "masking" of the antigenic sites. Although several studies showed that the composition of buffer can influence the quality of the immunostaining (Lucassen et al. 1993 ; Shi et al. 1993 , Shi et al. 1995 ), we could not confirm these data for nuclear receptor antibodies in our laboratory. We also tested whether the pH of the antigen retrieval buffer might influence the quality of the immunohistochemical staining using pH 2, 4, 6, and 8 in citrate buffer. Our results suggested that the optimal staining for steroid receptors could be obtained at pH 6 (unpublished results).

Ischemia after decapitation may lead to serious deleterious effects on receptor staining at the protein level. Loss of immunoreactivity was observed in the estrogen and androgen receptor immunostaining compared to perfusion data. These results indicate that ischemic effects are dependent on receptor types and/or antigen epitopes. It is important to note, however, that in all groups immunohistochemically stained for ER, AR, or PR, the distribution pattern of immunopositive cells did not appear to differ between these two conditions at the zero time point. Although sex steroid receptor-containing nuclei were still visible 6 hr after death, the immunostaining was gradually and markedly decreased. ER became hardly detectable after a 24-hr postmortem delay. Weakly stained PR-immunoreactive cell populations were still visible 1 day after death, but the staining was less homogeneous due to strongly labeled single neurons. In comparison to ER and PR, however, after 1 postmortem day a less dramatic decrease in the AR immunoreactivity was observed. Taken together, ER and PR immunostaining was most prominently influenced by the postmortem time.

Speculation that the length of fixation might result in cytoplasmic staining, as was reported earlier on free-floating material (Blaustein 1992 ), was not supported by our observations. The only change in the subcellular distribution occurred in a few PR-containing neurons after a longer postmortem time. In these cells, next to the nuclear staining perinuclear cytoplasmic staining was also observed, probably due to postmortem decomposition. Our present data showed, independently of the duration of postmortem time, that all three sex hormone receptors reside predominantly within the nuclear compartment. Furthermore, with either type of fixation (perfusion vs immersion), the staining pattern of receptor-containing tissues stayed exclusively nuclear in the paraffin-embedded rat brain. One should keep in mind that these data were obtained by using a given antibody for each receptor. Staining intensity can be different when antibodies against other epitopes of the same receptors are applied. Therefore, we suggest that before starting a quantitative study on human paraffin-embedded material the antibody's postmortem characteristics should be tested on a series of sections similar to those used in the present study.

Taken together, postmortem delay and long fixation time are believed to prevent successful immunohistochemical staining of steroid receptors. The present study shows that the detrimental effect of prolonged fixation can be effectively reversed by microwave treatment. Although immunoreactivity of sex steroid receptors does not immediately deteriorate due to postmortem delay, the quality of the staining is very much dependent on antigens and antibodies.


  Acknowledgments

Supported by NWO (#903-47004) to MF.

We thank Drs Gail S. Prins and Geoffrey L. Greene (University of Illinois, Chicago, IL) for the PG-21 antibody, Dr C. W. Pool and Mr J. J. van Heerikhuize for the IBAS program, Dr M. Diamant for the statistical analysis, Dr M. Hofman for critically reading the manuscript, and Mr G. Van der Meulen for the photography.

Received for publication December 3, 2001; accepted December 13, 2001.


  Literature Cited
Top
Summary
Introduction
Material and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Al Saati T, Clamens S, Cohen–Knafo E, Faye JC, Prats H, Coindre JM, Wafflart J, Caverivière P, Bayard F, Delsol G (1993) Production of monoclonal antibodies to human estrogen-receptor protein (ER) using recombinant ER (RER). Int J Cancer 55:651-654[Medline]

Bethea CL, Fahrenbach WH, Sprangers SA, Freesh F (1992) Immunocytochemical localization of progestin receptors in monkey hypothalamus: effects of estrogen and progestin. Endocrinology 130:895-905[Abstract]

Blaustein JD (1992) Cytoplasmic estrogen receptors in rat brain: immunocytochemical evidence using three antibodies with distinct epitopes. Endocrinology 131:1336-1342[Abstract]

Brolin J, Skoog L, Ekman P (1992) Immunohistochemistry and biochemistry in detection of androgen, progesterone, and estrogen receptors in benign and malignant human prostatic tissue. Prostate 20:281-295[Medline]

Cintra A, Fuxe K, Härfstrand A, Agnati LF, Miller LS, Green JL, Gustafsson J-Å (1986) On the cellular localization and distribution of estrogen receptors in the rat tel- and diencephalon using monoclonal antibodies to human estrogen receptor. Neurochem Int 8:587-595

Diamond MI, Miner JN, Yoshinaga SK, Yamamoto KR (1990) Transcription factor interactions: selectors of positive or negative regulation from a single DNA element. Science 249:1266-1272[Medline]

Donahue JE, Stopa EG, Chorsky RL, King JC, Schipper HM, Tobet SA, Blaustein JD, Reichlin S (2000) Cells containing immunoreactive estrogen receptor-alpha in the human basal forebrain. Brain Res 856:142-151[Medline]

DonCarlos LL, Monroy E, Morrell JI (1991) Distribution of estrogen receptor-immunoreactive cells in the forebrain of the female guinea pig. J Comp Neurol 305:591-612[Medline]

Erkut ZA, Pool C, Swaab DF (1998) Glucocorticoids supress corticotropin-releasing hormone and vasopressin expression in human hypothalamic neurons. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:2066-2073[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Evans RM (1988) The steroid and thyroid hormone receptor superfamily. Science 240:889-895[Medline]

Fernández–Guasti A, Kruijver FPM, Fodor M, Swaab DF (2000) Sex differences in the distribution of androgen receptors in the human hypothalamus. J Comp Neurol 425:422-435[Medline]

Fox CA, Ross LR, Handa RJ, Jacobson CD (1991) Localization of cells containing etsrogen receptor-like immunoreactivity in the Brazilian opossum brain. Brain Res 546:96-105[Medline]

Gahr M (1990) Localization of androgen receptors and estrogen receptors in the same cells of songbird brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:9445-9448[Abstract]

Hardy JA, Wester P, Winblad B, Gezelius C, Bring G, Eriksson A (1985) The patients dying after long terminal phase have acidotic brain: implications for biochemical measurements on autopsy tissue. J Neural Transm 61:253-264

Herbison AE (1995) Neurochemical identity of neurones expressing oestrogen and androgen receptors in sheep hypothalamus. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 49:271-283[Medline]

Iqbal J, Swanson JJ, Prins GS, Jacobson CD (1995) Androgen receptor-like immunoreactivity in the Brazilian opossum brain and pituitary: distribution and effects of castration and testosterone replacement in the adult male. Brain Res 703:1-18[Medline]

Ishunina TA, Kruijver FPM, Balesar R, Swaab DF (2000) Differential expression of estrogen receptor {alpha} and ß immunoreactivity in the human supraoptic nucleus in relation to sex and aging. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:3283-3291[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ishunina TA, Swaab DF (2001) Increased expression of estrogen receptor {alpha} and ß in the nucleus basalis of Meynert in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging 22:417-426[Medline]

Kruijver FPM, Fernández–Guasti A, Fodor M, Kraan E, Swaab DF (2001) Sex differences in androgen receptors of the human mamillary bodies are related to endocrine status rather than to sexual orientation or transsexuality. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:818-827[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lehman MN, Ebling FJ, Moenter SM, Karsch FJ (1993) Distribution of estrogen receptor-immunoreactive cells in the sheep brain. Endocrinology 133:876-886[Abstract]

Li HY, Blaustein JD, De Vries GJ, Wade GN (1993) Estrogen-receptor immunoreactivity in hamster brain: preoptic area, hypothalamus and amygdala. Brain Res 631:304-312[Medline]

Lucassen PJ, Ravid R, Gonatas NK, Swaab DF (1993) Activation of the human supraoptic and paraventricular neurons with aging and Alzheimer's disease as judged from increasing size of the Golgi apparatus. Brain Res 632:105-113[Medline]

Michael RP, Clancy AN, Zumpe D (1995) Distribution of androgen receptor-like immunoreactivity in the brain of cynomolgus monkeys. J Neuroendocrinol 7:713-719[Medline]

Okamura H, Yamamoto K, Hayashi S, Kuroiwa A, Muramatsu M (1992) A polyclonal antibody to the rat oestrogen receptor expressed in Eschericia coli: characterization and application to immunohistochemistry. J Endocrinol 135:333-341[Abstract]

Perry EK, Perry RH, Tomlinson E (1982) The influence of agonal status on some neurochemical activities of postmortem human brain tissue. Neurosci Lett 29:303-307[Medline]

Press MF, Greene GL (1984) An immunocytochemical method for demonstrating estrogen receptor in human uterus using monoclonal antibodies to human estrophilin. Lab Invest 50:480-486[Medline]

Prins GS, Birsch L, Greene GL (1991) Androgen receptor localization in different cell types of the adult rat prostate. Endocrinology 129:3187-3199[Abstract]

Puy L, MacLusky N, Becker L, Karsan N, Trachtenberg J, Brown T (1995) Immunocytochemical detection of androgen receptor in the human temporal cortex: characterization and application of polyclonal androgen receptor antibodies in frozen and paraffin-embedded tissues. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 55:197-209[Medline]

Sapolsky RM, Meaney MJ (1988) Postmortem decay in glucocorticoid binding in human and primate brain. Brain Res 448:182-185[Medline]

Shi S-R, Chaiwun B, Young L, Cote RJ, Taylor CR (1993) Antigen retrieval technique utilizing citrate buffer or urea solution for immunohistochemical demonstration of androgen receptor in formalin-fixed paraffin sections. J Histochem Cytochem 41:1599-1604[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shi S-R, Cote RJ, Taylor CR (2001) Antigen retrieval techniques: current perspectives. J Histochem Cytochem 49:931-937[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shi S-R, Imam SA, Young L, Cote RJ, Taylor CR (1995) Antigen retrieval immunohistochemistry under the influence of pH using monoclonal antibodies. J Histochem Cytochem 43:193-201[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shughrue PJ, Merchenthaler I (2001) Distribution of estrogen receptor ß immunoreactivity in the rat central nervous system. J Comp Neurol 436:64-81[Medline]

Sisk CL, DonCarlos LL (1995) Estrogen receptor immunoreactivity in ferret brain is regulated by estradiol in a region specific manner. Brain Res 688:198-202[Medline]

Spokes EGS (1979) An analysis of factors influencing the measurements of dopamine, noradrenaline, glutamate decarboxylase and choline acetylase in human post mortem brain tissue. Brain Res 102:333-346

Swaab DF (1997) Neurobiology and neuropathology of the human hypothalamus. In Bloom FE, Björklund A, Hökfelt T, eds. Handbook of Chemical Neuroanatomy. Vol 13. The Primate Nervous System, Part 1. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 39-137

Szekeres G, Lutz Y, Le Tourneau A, Delaage M (1994) Steroid hormone receptor immunostaining on paraffin sections with microwave heating and trypsin digestion. J Histotechnol 17:321-324

Taylor AH, Al-Azzawi F (2000) Immunolocalisation of oestrogen receptor in human tissues. J Mol Endocrinol 24:145-155[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Thind KK, Goldsmith PC (1997) Expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in glutamate and GABA neurons of the pubertal female monkey hypothalamus. Neuroendocrinology 65:314-324[Medline]

Traish AM, Wotiz HH (1990) Monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies to human progesterone receptor peptide-(533-547) recognize a specific site in unactivated (8S) and activated (4S) progesterone receptor and distinguish between intact and proteolyzed receptors. Endocrinology 127:1167-1175[Abstract]

Van Leeuwen FW, Chouham S, Axelson JF, Swaab DF, Van Eerdenburg FJCM (1995) Sex differences in the distribution of estrogen receptors in the septal area and hypothalamus of the domestic pig (Sus scrofa). Neuroscience 64:261-275[Medline]

Warembourg M, Jolivet A, Milgrom E (1989) Immunohistochemical evidence of the presence of estrogen and progesterone receptors in the same neurons of the guinea pig hypothalamus and preoptic area. Brain Res 480:1-15[Medline]

Wetzel DM, Bohn MC, Hamill RW (1994) Postmortem stability of mRNA for glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptor in rodent brain. Brain Res 649:117-121[Medline]

Wood RI, Newman SW (1993) Intracellular partitioning of androgen receptor immunoreactivity in the brain of the Syrian hamster: effects of castration and steroid replacement. J Neurobiol 24:925-938[Medline]

Wu SS, Nathanielsz PW, McDonald TJ (1995) Immunocytochemical distribution of androgen receptors in the hypothalamus and pituitary of the fetal baboon in late gestation. Dev Brain Res 84:278-281[Medline]

Zhou L, Blaustein JD, De Vries GJ (1994) Distribution of androgen receptor immunoreactivity in vasopressin- and oxytocin-immunoreactive neurons in the male rat brain. Endocrinology 134:2622-2627[Abstract]





This Article
Abstract
Full Text (PDF)
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Citation Map
Services
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Articles by Fodor, M.
Articles by Swaab, D. F.
Articles citing this Article
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Fodor, M.
Articles by Swaab, D. F.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]