Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, Vol. 50, 1487-1492, November 2002, Copyright © 2002, The Histochemical Society, Inc.


ARTICLE

Chromogranin A in the Human Gastrointestinal Tract: An Immunocytochemical Study with Region-specific Antibodies

Guida Maria Portela–Gomesa,c and Mats Stridsbergb
a Department of Genetics and Pathology, Unit of Pathology, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
b Department of Medical Sciences, Clinical Chemistry, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
c University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden, and the Centres of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal

Correspondence to: Guida Maria Portela–Gomes, Dept. of Genetics and Pathology, Unit of Pathology, University Hospital, 75185 Uppsala, Sweden. E-mail: portela_gomes@yahoo.com


  Summary
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

We studied the immunoreactivity of 12 different region-specific antibodies to the chromogranin A (CgA) molecule in the various neuroendocrine cell types of the human gastrointestinal (GI) tract by using double immunofluorescence techniques. These staining results were compared with others obtained with a commercial monoclonal CgA antibody (LK2H10). G (gastrin)-cells showed immunoreactivity to virtually all region-specific antibodies, but with varying frequency. Most intestinal EC (enterochromaffin)- and L (enteroglucagon)-cells were immunoreactive to the antibodies to the N-terminal and mid-portion of the CgA molecule, whereas the EC-cells in the stomach reacted with fewer region-specific antibodies. D (somatostatin)-cells reacted to the CgA 411–424 antibody and only occasionally showed immunoreactivity to the other CgA antibodies. A larger cytoplasmic area was stained with the antibodies to CgA 17–38 and 176–195 than with the other antibodies tested. These differences in staining pattern may reflect different cleavage of the CgA molecule in different cell types and at different regions of the GI tract.

(J Histochem Cytochem 50:1487–1492, 2002)

Key Words: chromogranin A, chromogranin A fragments, immunocytochemistry, gastrointestinal tract, human, neuroendocrine cells


  Introduction
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

HUMAN CHROMOGRANIN A (CgA) is an acidic glycoprotein with 439 amino acids. In a previous work, CgA immunoreactivity was studied in the different neuroendocrine (NE) cell types of the human gastrointestinal (GI) tract by using a commercial monoclonal CgA antibody (MAb CgA) (Portela-Gomes et al. 1997 ). CgA immunoreactivity occurred in most NE cell types but the intensity varied as did, to some extent, its intracellular distribution. Recent immunocytochemical studies have been performed in human endocrine pancreas using 12 CgA region-specific antibodies (Portela-Gomes and Stridsberg 2001 ). The results showed a variable expression pattern in the four major NE cell types, indicating that the CgA molecule is processed differently in these cell types. The proteolytic processing of CgA occurs both in the trans-Golgi system and in the secretory granules, and is carried out by several enzymes. The major endopeptidases belong to the subtilisin-like proprotein convertase (PC) family and play an important role in the cleavage of the molecule at dibasic sites, giving rise to several peptides with biological activity. Eight members of the PC family have been identified (furin/SPC1, PC1/3, PC2, PC4, PACE4, PC5A, PC5B/6, PC7/8) but two of them, PC1/3 and PC2, are believed to be responsible for most of the processing of the protein precursors of the NE system (Seidah et al. 1998 ; Laslop et al. 2000 ). Other enzymes are also involved in post-translational modifications of CgA (Steiner 1998 ). Knowledge about the existence of CgA-derived peptides in the NE cell types of the GI tract is limited. Studies have been performed with nine region-specific antibodies to the rat CgA molecule in the rat GI mucosa. Curry et al. 1991 found different immunoreactive patterns with their antibodies at various levels of the rat GI tract but did not relate the staining results to the cell type. Norlen et al. 1997 , Norlen et al. 2001 reported a similar study but referred their staining results to the different NE cell types in the rat stomach. No corresponding immunocytochemical study has been reported in the human GI tract. We have therefore studied the CgA immunoreactivity in various NE cell types of the human GI tract with our antibodies to the 12 different regions of the human CgA molecule.


  Materials and Methods
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Tissue specimens from adult human gastric corpus and antrum, proximal duodenum, distal ileum, and sigmoid colon were obtained from surgical samples removed at surgeries for adenocarcinoma. The specimens examined were taken from macroscopically normal mucosa at least 3–5 cm from the neoplasm; all showed normal microscopic structure.

The tissue specimens were fixed in 10% buffered neutral formalin for 18–20 hr at RT, followed by routine processing to paraffin. Sections 5 µm thick were cut and attached to poly-L-lysine-coated or to positively charged (Superfrost+; Menzel Glässer, Braunschweig, Germany) glass slides. Some sections were pretreated in a microwave oven (Philips Whirlpool; Nordic AB, Stockholm, Sweden) twice for 5 min at 750 W, using a citrate buffer, pH 6.0, as retrieval solution.

The sections were stained with hematoxylin–eosin or immunostained to demonstrate the presence of various parts of the CgA molecule. The streptavidin–biotin complex (ABC) technique (Hsu et al. 1981 ), with diaminobenzidine as chromogen, was applied as a single immunostain mainly to reveal the distribution pattern of NE cells in the respective GI regions and to perform the control stainings specified below.

Co-localization studies were performed with the present CgA region-specific antibodies and either antibodies to various secretory granule hormones or a commercial MAb CgA. In these co-localization studies, immunofluorescence methods were used. For double immunofluorescence staining, the sections were incubated with a cocktail of two antibodies, either one MAb and one polyclonal antibody or two polyclonal antibodies (anti-rabbit and/or anti-guinea pig), overnight at RT, followed by incubations in biotinylated swine anti-rabbit IgG, 30 min at RT, and a mixture of streptavidin–Texas Red and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated goat anti-mouse or anti-guinea pig IgG. Before application of the respective primary antibodies, the sections were incubated with non-immune serum from the animal species producing the secondary antibodies, at a dilution of 1:10.

The CgA region-specific antibodies used are characterized in Table 1. The selected sequences for the respective peptides are shown in Fig 1. For details of the production and characterization of the CgA region-specific antibodies see Portela-Gomes and Stridsberg 2001 . The other primary antibodies were mouse MAbs against human chromogranin A (Boehringer–Mannheim; Mannheim, Germany, clone LK2H10), glucagon/glicentin and somatostatin (Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark; clones Glu-001 and Som-018, respectively), and serotonin (Medicorp, Montreal, PQ, Canada; clone YC5/45), and polyclonal guinea pig antibodies against human gastrin (EuroDiagnostica, Malmö, Sweden; code no. B-GP360-1). The working dilutions for immunofluorescence were 1:20, 1:20, 1:80, 1:20, and 1:240, respectively.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the human chromogranin A molecule, with the amino acid sequences of the twelve peptides used for raising antibodies placed in the appropriate positions (A1–17 to A411–424). The disulfide bridge (S) is shown on the N-terminal. The 10 potential cleavage sites (first amino acid of the dibasic pair) are indicated by vertical lines (figures indicate positions 77–437). From Portela–Gomes and Stridsberg, 2001, with permission.


 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Chromogranin A region-specific antibodies used; all antibodies were raised in rabbit

The labeled secondary antisera were biotinylated swine anti-rabbit IgG (DAKO; Glostrup, Denmark), Texas Red-labeled streptavidin (Vector Laboratories; Burlingame, CA), and FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse and anti-guinea pig IgG (Sigma Chemical; St Louis, MO).

The control stainings included (a) omission of the primary antiserum, (b) replacement of the first layer of antibody by non-immune serum 1:10 and by the diluent alone, and (c) pre-incubation (24 hr) of primary antiserum with the relevant antigen (10 nmol per ml diluted antibody solution) before application to the sections. The secondary antibodies were tested in relation to the specificity of the species in which the primary antibodies had been raised, the secondary antibody in question being replaced by secondary antibodies from different animal species. These control tests were performed with ABC (single staining) and immunofluorescence techniques (co-localization studies).

For co-localization studies, the sections were examined in a Vanox AHBS3 fluorescence microscope (Olympus; Tokyo, Japan) equipped with filters (Olympus) giving excitation at wavelengths of 475–555 nm for Texas Red (filter no. 32821, dichroic mirror BH2-DMG), and 453–488 nm for FITC (no. 32822, BH2-DMIB), and a double-band filter set (no. 39538, BH2-DFC5) for simultaneous visualization of Texas Red and FITC-labeled cells was also used (excitation at 550–570 nm and 480–495 nm, respectively). Photographs were taken with Fujicolor 400 film.


  Results
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

The antibodies to the different CgA antigens gave rise to various staining patterns in the GI tract. The intensity of the immunoreactivity was strong with antibodies to CgA 17–38, 176–195, and 238–247, and weak to moderate with the others. Furthermore, a larger cytoplasmic area was stained with the antibodies corresponding to the sequences 17–38 and 238–247 in the antrum and to 176–195 in most cells at all GI levels, compared with the other region-specific antibodies, which immunostained mainly the infranuclear region. This difference was most apparent with the antibody to 176–195 in the serotonin (enterochromaffin, EC) cells of the antrum and duodenum. The staining intensity with the region-specific antibodies was enhanced by microwave pretreatment but the frequency was not affected except for the CgA 361–372 antibody. The latter visualized few or no cells without this pretreatment but a moderate number afterwards.

Immunoreactivity of the Different CgA Region-specific Antibodies in the Different Endocrine Cell Types (Table 2)
G-cells. The frequency of the antral G-cells displaying immunoreactivity to the different region-specific antibodies varied. The two N-terminal and the two C-terminal antibodies, as well as two mid-portion antibodies (CgA 176–195 and 238–247) stained a majority of G-cells (Fig 2), whereas the remaining antibodies stained either few or no cells.



View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Human antrum, double immunostained for gastrin (FITC) and CgA 176–195 (Texas Red). Co-localization, illustrated by the yellow color (double-band filter set), shows immunoreactivity to this CgA antigen in all gastrin cells. Bar = 80 µm.

Figure 3. Human antrum, double immunostained for serotonin (FITC) and CgA 176–195 (Texas Red). Yellow color reflects co-localization of this CgA antigen in the serotonin-producing enterochromaffin cells. Bar = 80 µm.

Figure 4. Human antrum, double immunostained for somatostatin (FITC) and CgA 116–130 (Texas Red), showing that somatostatin and this CgA antigen appear in different cells. Bar = 100 µm.

Figure 5. Human duodenum, double immunostained for somatostatin (FITC) and CgA 17–38 (Texas Red), showing co-localization of these two peptides in only one cell (yellow). Bar = 100 µm.

Figure 6. Human duodenum, double immunostained for somatostatin (FITC) and CgA 176–195 (Texas Red). This CgA antigen is demonstrated in three somatostatin cells (yellow). Bar = 80 µm.

Figure 7. Human corpus, double immunostained for somatostatin (FITC) and CgA 411–424, showing that most somatostatin cells are immunoreactive for this CgA antigen (yellow). Bar = 80 µm.

Figure 8. Human antrum, double immunostained for (A) a commercial monoclonal CgA antibody (LK2H10; FITC) and (B) an antibody to CgA 176–195 (Texas Red). (C) With the double filter set, co-localization of the immunoreactive cells to both antibodies is illustrated by the yellow color. CgA 176–195 is evident throughout the cytoplasm, whereas the monoclonal CgA antibody is mostly evident basally. Bar = 53 µm.


 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Co-localization of chromogranin A-related peptides in the human gastrointestinal neuroendocrine cells, using region-specific antibodiesa

EC-cells. The serotonin-producing EC-cells also showed a varying immunoreactive pattern with the region-specific antibodies. In the corpus, virtually all EC-cells displayed immunoreactivity to CgA 100–113 and 176–195. In the antrum, only six antigens were detected, i.e., CgA 1–17, 17–38, 100–113, 176–195, 284–301, and 324–337 (Fig 3). The CgA 17–38 antibody was detected in virtually all EC-cells, the others only in a few to a moderate number of cells. In the duodenum, ileum, and colon, vitually all EC-cells were immunoreactive to the N-terminal and mid-portion antibodies. However, no immunoreactive cells were observed at any GI region with the region-specific antibodies to CgA 361 to the C-terminus, with one exception—a few cells in the corpus showed immunostaining with the antibody to 375–384.

D-cells. Virtually all D-cells in the corpus, a moderate number in the duodenum, but very few at the remaining GI levels, were stained with the CgA 411–424 antibody. Few D-cells in the duodenum displayed immunoreactivity with four antibodies, i.e., CgA 17–38, 100–113, 176–195, and 324–337, whereas this cell type was virtually nonreactive to all the other region-specific antibodies in the GI tract (Fig 4 Fig 5 Fig 6 Fig 7).

L-cells. L-cells in all regions of the intestinal tract were immunoreactive to all region-specific antibodies except two, whose epitopes are localized between the sequence 361–384. The C-terminal antibody stained fewer cells compared with the other antibodies.

Immunoreactivity to MAb CgA
MAb CgA immunostained G-, EC-, and L-cells but only exceptionally D-cells (Fig 8).


  Discussion
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

The human GI tract contains several NE cell types, most of which display CgA immunoreactivity with the commercial MAb CgA (LK2H10; Portela–Gomes et al. 1977). The present study is the first investigation of the human GI tract regarding the expression of various regions of the CgA molecule related to the different NE cell types.

The immunoreactive patterns varied markedly in the different NE cell types. A similar variation with our region-specific antibodies had also been found in the human endocrine pancreas (Portela-Gomes and Stridsberg 2001 ). Norlen et al. 2001 also reported a variation in immunoreactivity with their region-specific antibodies in the NE cells of the rat stomach. These authors found two fragments specifically related to a particular cell type: CgA 316–329 (WE–14) only in G-cells and CgA 291–319 only in D-cells. In our study, however, none of the antibodies was exclusively related to any particular cell type, although selectivity was observed with the antibody to 375–384, which stained virtually all antral G-cells and a few EC-cells in the corpus, but no other cell in the GI tract. None of our region-specific antibodies immunostained all NE cell types. On the whole, the antibodies to CgA 176–195 (chromacins) and 17–38 (C-terminal vasostatins) visualized more NE cells at all GI regions than did the other antibodies. The commercial MAb CgA (LK2H10), whose epitope was localized in the N-terminal pancreastatin sequence 250–284 (Portela-Gomes and Stridsberg 2001 ), stained roughly as many cells as the antibodies to CgA 176–195 and 17–38. These two antibodies were more immunoreactive and also stained a larger cytoplasmic area than the other antibodies tested. Recently, anti-bacterial and anti-fungal effects for both vasostatins and chromacins have been reported (Strub et al. 1996 ; Lugardon et al. 2000 ). These peptides may therefore have an antibacterial function in the GI tract. The finding in the present study may be related to the anti-bacterial role of these two CgA regions.

The G-cell type displayed immunoreactivity to all but one of the CgA region-specific antibodies (116–130), but the frequency of the immunostained cells with the various region-specific antibodies varied from virtually all to very few. It is unknown whether these variations may be related to different molecular forms of gastrin or to different functional states of the cell. However, these variations may reflect a different expression of PCs. PC2 is responsible for the generation of gastrin-17, but the cleavage specificities of PC1/3 and PC5, also found in G-cells, are not known (Scopsi et al. 1995 ; Macro et al. 1997 ).

D-cells expressing CgA 411–424 occurred at all regions of the human GI tract, but the immunoreactive cell fraction varied; this cell type was mostly unreactive with the other antibodies. These results differed from those reported by Norlen et al. 2001 , who found most CgA antigens in this cell type in the rat stomach. This disparity can be attributed to species differences in the expression of CgA or somatostatin. Our earlier results concerning the detection of this CgA antigen in human pancreatic islets (Portela-Gomes and Stridsberg 2001 ) are consistent with the findings in the GI tract. Smaller somatostatin molecular forms, which are generated by PC2, PC1/3, and PACE4, predominate in antral and pancreatic D-cells, whereas higher molecular forms, generated by PACE4 and furin, occur in intestinal D-cells (Skak-Nielsen et al. 1987 ; Francis et al. 1990 ; Brakch et al. 1995 ). The similarities found between the processing of CgA in pancreas and in the GI tract, unrelated to the molecular forms of somatostatin that occur in different GI regions, may indicate a physiological importance of CgA 411–424.

EC-cells displayed a different staining pattern in the stomach and intestine, with the stomach expressing fewer CgA antigens than the intestine. Most EC-cells in the corpus were immunostained by only two antigens (100–113 and 176–195) and in the antrum by one (17–38). In the intestine, most EC-cells were stained with the N-terminal and mid-portion antibodies, whereas the C-terminal antibodies did not give rise to any immunoreactivity.

The intestinal L-cells showed a pattern similar to the EC-cells at the same level of the intestinal tract. However, the expression of CgA epitopes in the L-cells did not exactly match the CgA expression in pancreatic glucagon (A)-cells (Portela-Gomes and Stridsberg 2001 ). The genes encoding for enteroglucagon in intestinal L-cells and glucagon in pancreatic A-cells are identical, and the translated pre-pro-glucagon molecule is identical in both cell types (Bell et al. 1983 ). However, the processing differs in the two cell types, which gives mainly glicentin and GLP-1 in the L-cells and glucagon in the A-cells. This difference in post-translational processing is probably mediated by different expression of PCs, and it has been shown that PC1/3 is important for the generation of GLP-1 and that PC2 is essential for generation of glucagon (Creemers et al. 1998 ). Because these enzymes also can act on CgA, a different expression of the CgA peptides could be expected. Compared to our previous study of expression of CgA epitopes in human pancreatic islets (Portela-Gomes and Stridsberg 2001 ), we found that the CgA sequences 116–130 and 238–247 were strongly expressed in L-cells but absent in pancreatic A-cells and, conversely, the CgA sequence 375–384 is expressed in A-cells but absent in L-cells. These differences are probably the result of different expression of PCs in the different cell types.

ECL (enterochromaffin-like)-cells are a type predominating in the corpus, not specifically identified in the present study. However, the immunoreactive cells that were visualized by the region-specific antibodies and nonreactive to the serotonin antibodies were most likely ECL-cells. On the whole, the frequency of CgA-immunoreactive cells not showing serotonin immunoreactivity parallels that of EC-cells.

The variations, both in number of immunoreactive cells and in intensity of immunoreactivity, reflect the available epitopes and raise the possibility that the pattern of CgA epitopes might be the result of cell function. The negative or weak immunoreaction may indicate that the CgA antigens were too few to be detected or that the epitopes were masked either by other granule-related proteins or by the histological processing. A certain masking effect was apparent, because microwave pretreatment increased the staining intensity but did not influence the quantitative results except for CgA 361–372. Staining with the latter antibody appeared positive only after this pretreatment. A further explanation for the various staining patterns could be that the CgA molecule is cleaved by different processing enzymes, particularly prohormone convertases (PC2, 1/3), but also by carboxypeptidases and amidating enzymes (Eskeland et al. 1996 ; Kimura et al. 2000 ). CgA-derived peptides, circulating or in tissue extracts, have been reported, strongly supporting the latter suggestion (Stridsberg et al. 1995 ; cf. Helle et al. 2001 ).

In conclusion, this study shows that different cell types at various regions of the GI tract demonstrate to various extents epitopes of the 12 CgA region-specific antibodies, which may indicate processing of the CgA molecule, giving rise to several peptides of possible functional significance.


  Acknowledgments

Supported by a grant from the Swedish Cancer Foundation and the Ihres Fund.

We thank Professor Lars Grimelius, Uppsala, for fruitful discussions and laboratory facilities.

Received for publication March 27, 2002; accepted June 7, 2002.


  Literature Cited
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Bell GI, Sanchez–Pescador R, Laybourn PJ, Najarian RC (1983) Exon duplicate and divergence in the human preproglucagon gene. Nature 304:368-371[Medline]

Brakch N, Galanopoulou AS, Patel YC, Boileau G, Seidah NG (1995) Comparative proteolytic processing of rat prosomatostatin by the convertases PC1, PC2, furin, PACE4 and PC5 in constitutive and regulated secretory pathways. FEBS Lett 362:143-146[Medline]

Creemers JW, Jackson RS, Hutton JC (1998) Molecular and cellular regulation of prohormone processing. Semin Cell Dev Biol 9:3-10[Medline]

Curry WJ, Johnston CF, Hutton JC, Arden SD, Rutherford NG, Shaw C, Buchanan KD (1991) The tissue distribution of rat chromogranin A-derived peptides: evidence for differential tissue processing from sequence specific antisera. Histochemistry 96:531-538[Medline]

Eskeland NL, Zhou A, Dinh TQ, Wu H, Parmer RJ, Mains RE, O'Connor DT (1996) Chromogranin A processing and secretion: specific role of endogenous and exogenous prohormone convertases in the regulated secretory pathway. J Clin Invest 98:148-156[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Francis BH, Baskin DG, Saunders DR, Ensinck JW (1990) Distribution of somatostatin-14 and somatostatin-28 gastrointestinal-pancreatic cells of rats and humans. Gastroenterology 99:1283-1291[Medline]

Helle KB, Metz–Boutigue M-H, Aunis D (2001) Chromogranin A as a calcium-binding precursor for a multitude of regulatory peptides for the immune, endocrine and metabolic systems. Curr Med Chem Immunol Endocrine Metab Agents 1:119-140

Hsu SM, Raine T, Fanger H (1981) Use of avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) in immunoperoxidase techniques: a comparison between ABC and unlabeled (PAP) procedures. J Histochem Cytochem 29:577-580[Abstract]

Kimura N, Pilichowska M, Okamoto H, Kimura I, Aunis D (2000) Immunohistochemical expression of chromogranins A and B, prohormone convertases 2 and 3, and amidating enzyme in carcinoid tumors and pancreatic endocrine tumors. Mod Pathol 13:140-146[Medline]

Laslop A, Doblinger A, Weiss U (2000) Proteolytic processing of chromogranins. Adv Exp Med Biol 482:155-166[Medline]

Lugardon K, Raffner R, Goumon Y, Corti A, Delmas A, Bulet P, Aunis D et al. (2000) Antibacterial and antifungal activities of vasostatin-1, the N-terminal fragment of chromogranin A. J Biol Chem 275:10745-10753[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Macro JA, Bate GW, Varro A, Vaillant C, Seidah NG, Dimaline R, Dockray GJ (1997) Regulation by gastric acid of the processing of progastrin-derived peptides in rat antral mucosa. J Physiol 502(pt2):409-419[Abstract]

Norlén P, Curry WJ, Björkqvist M, Maule A, Cunningham RT, Hogg RB, Harriott P et al. (2001) Cell-specific processing of chromogranin A in endocrine cells of the rat stomach. J Histochem Cytochem 49:9-18[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Norlén P, Curry WJ, Chen D, Zhao C-M, Johnston CF, Håkanson R (1997) Expression of the chromogranin A-derived peptides pancreastatin and WE14 in rat stomach ECL cells. Regul Pept 70:121-133[Medline]

Portela–Gomes GM, Stridsberg M (2001) Selective processing of chromogranin A in the different islet cells in human pancreas. J Histochem Cytochem 49:483-490[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Portela–Gomes GM, Stridsberg M, Johansson H, Grimelius L (1997) Complex co-localization of chromogranins and neurohormones in the human gastrointestinal tract. J Histochem Cytochem 45:815-822[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Scopsi L, Gullo M, Rilke F, Martin S, Steiner DF (1995) Proprotein convertases (PC1/PC3 and PC2) in normal and neoplastic human tissues: their use as markers of neuroendocrine differentiation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:294-301[Abstract]

Seidah NG, Day R, Marcinkiewicz M, Chretien M (1998) Precursor convertases: an evolutionary ancient, cell-specific, combinatorial mechanism yielding diverse bioactive peptides and proteins. Ann NY Acad Sci 839:9-24[Free Full Text]

Skak–Nielsen T, Holst JJ, Baldissera FG, Poulsen SS (1987) Localization in the gastrointestinal tract of immunoreactive prosomatostatin. Regul Pept 19:183-195[Medline]

Steiner DF (1998) The proprotein convertases. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2:31-39[Medline]

Stridsberg M, Öberg K, Li Q, Engström U, Lundqvist G (1995) Measurements of chromogranin A, chromogranin B (secretogranin I), chromogranin C (secretogranin II) and pancreastatin in plasma and urine from patients with carcinoid tumours and endocrine pancreatic tumours. J Endocrinol 144:49-59[Abstract]

Strub JM, Goumon Y, Lugardon K, Capon C, Lopez M, Moniatte M, Dorsselaer AV et al. (1996) Antibacterial activity of glycosylated and phosphorylated chromogranin A-derived peptide 173-194 from bovine adrenal medullary chromaffin granules. J Biol Chem 271:28533-28540[Abstract/Free Full Text]