Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, Vol. 48, 471-480, April 2000, Copyright © 2000, The Histochemical Society, Inc.


SYMPOSIUM

New Frontiers in Gold Labeling

James F. Hainfelda and Richard D. Powellb
a Biology Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York
b Nanoprobes, Inc., Stony Brook, New York

Correspondence to: James F. Hainfeld, Biology Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973. E-mail: hainfeld@bnl.gov


  Summary
Top
Summary
Colloidal Gold
Gold Clusters
Discussion
Electron Microscopy
Summary
Literature Cited

Recent advances in gold technology have led to probes with improved properties and performance for cell biologists: higher labeling density, better sensitivity, and greater penetration into tissues. Gold clusters, such as the 1.4-nm Nanogold, are gold compounds that can be covalently linked to Fab' antibody fragments, making small and stable probes. Silver enhancement then makes these small gold particles easily visible by EM, LM, and directly by eye. Another advance is the combination of fluorescent and gold probes for correlative microscopy. Chemical crosslinking of gold particles to many biologically active molecules has made possible many novel probes, such as gold–lipids, gold–Ni–NTA, and gold–ATP. (J Histochem Cytochem 48: 471–480, 2000)

Key Words: gold, immunogold, electron microscopy, gold labeling, gold clusters, immunocytochemistry, colloidal gold, Nanogold


  Colloidal Gold
Top
Summary
Colloidal Gold
Gold Clusters
Discussion
Electron Microscopy
Summary
Literature Cited

Colloidal gold has been the label of choice for electron microscopy for some time, since it is made in convenient well-defined sizes and is rendered immunoreactive by adsorbing antibodies, as found by Faulk and Taylor 1971 . Earlier records indicate that colloidal gold was made and used in the 1600s (Handley 1989 ), but their microscopes were very primitive.


  Gold Clusters
Top
Summary
Colloidal Gold
Gold Clusters
Discussion
Electron Microscopy
Summary
Literature Cited

A newer gold technology has emerged based on the use of gold clusters, which are gold compounds with a core of multiple gold atoms, with the gold atoms at the surface covalently attached to organic groups. Undecagold, Au11(P(C6H5)3)7, was first described by McPartlin and the structure solved by X-ray diffraction (McPartlin et al. 1969 ), in which they found the gold core to contain 11 gold atoms with a diameter of 0.82 nm. This cluster was made water soluble by altering the organic groups (Bartlett et al. 1978 ), then was derivatized to link to proteins (Reardon and Frey 1984 ; Safer et al. 1986 ). The structure of one such gold cluster is shown in Fig 1. Although usually prepared with only one linking group per gold particle, so that only one protein molecule is attached, it can be made with multiple linker arms to attach several other molecules, if desired.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Structural diagram of monoamino-undecagold, with 11 gold atoms in the 0.82-nm core with 7 derivatized triphenylphosphines attached, one of which contains a terminal amino group for crosslinking.

A larger gold cluster was subsequently developed (Hainfeld and Furuya 1992 ) that has better visibility, the 1.4-nm Nanogold particle, which contains ~67 gold atoms in its core and is also covalently linkable, like undecagold. Other chemists had previously described large gold and other metal clusters (Vargaftik et al. 1985 ; Schmid 1988 ).

In keeping with the objective of making the smallest immunoprobe for best penetration and highest density labeling, the Fab' antibody fragment was chosen. Because the Fab' fragment is one third the size of a full IgG molecule and because the gold cluster can be site-specifically attached to the end opposite the antigen-combining region to preserve immunoreactivity, a probe that is significantly smaller than any IgG–colloidal gold probe can be made (Fig 2).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Size comparison of IgG-colloidal gold and Fab'-gold cluster probes. Left is schematic of maximal dimensions of IgG adsorbed to 10-nm colloidal gold. Center diagram is an "ultrasmall" 1.0-nm colloidal gold probe. Right diagram is of Fab'–Nanogold. Note that even using a small colloidal gold particle does not reduce dimensions significantly.


  Discussion
Top
Summary
Colloidal Gold
Gold Clusters
Discussion
Electron Microscopy
Summary
Literature Cited

Properties of Gold Clusters
What are the properties of these small gold cluster compounds and how do they differ from colloidal gold?

Stability. The gold particle is covalently linked to the antibody or other molecule. They are therefore more stable than colloid gold immunoprobes where antibodies are simply adsorbed, and activity can be undiminished even after a year or more. In contrast, colloidal undergoes some antibody dissociation (Horisberger 1989 ; Kramarcy and Sealock 1991 ).

Penetration. The small gold cluster (1.4-nm Nanogold) coupled to an Fab' fragment (5 nm) is smaller than an IgG (15 nm), giving excellent penetration into tissues (Takizawa and Robinson 1994 ); even 40 µm has been reported (Sun et al. 1995 ).

Better Labeling of Antigens. It has been recognized in many studies (Takizawa and Robinson 1994 ) that the smaller the gold particle, the more sites are labeled. Factors that explain this are as follows. A small particle does not obscure adjacent antigens and smaller probes diffuse better to sites. In addition, the gold cluster is attached at the hinge region cysteine, which is at the opposite end from the antigen binding site of the Fab', so the gold does not interfere with antibody binding and native immunoreactivity is preserved (Hainfeld 1987 ). With colloidal gold, some antibody dissociates (Kramarcy and Sealock 1991 ), then competes for antigen binding sites, reducing those that then have gold. With gold clusters, the antibody is stably covalently attached, thus leading to more quantitative gold labeling.

Better Resolution. Gold clusters have even been used to mark specific sites of single biomolecules (Schnyder et al. 1995 ; Wenzel and Baumeister 1995 ; Zlotnick et al. 1997 ; Mosesson et al. 1998 ; Luo et al. 1999 ). There is no diffusion of reaction products as is seen with DAB.

Peptide and Small Molecule Conjugates Possible. Gold clusters can be covalently attached to almost any small molecule, including peptides (Segond von Banchet and Heppelmann 1995 ), ATP, nucleic acids (Skripkin et al. 1993 ), lipids, and carbohydrates (Lipka et al. 1983 ). Most of these conjugates are not possible with colloidal gold because they do not stably adsorb.

Small and Uniform Size. Because the clusters are actual compounds, they have a specific size (Hainfeld and Furuya 1992 ). In contrast, colloidal gold <3 nm or "ultrasmall gold" (a colloidal gold ~1 nm) is very irregular (Hainfeld 1990 ).

No Aggregation. The small gold clusters do not aggregate even over time, so conjugates that contain one gold cluster attached to one Fab' can be prepared (Hainfeld and Furuya 1992 ). In contrast, colloidal gold tends to be "sticky," adsorbs multiple molecules, and particularly with small (1–3-nm) colloidal gold tends to aggregate (Hainfeld 1990 ), leading to large oligomeric gold–antibody structures. These lack many of the desirable properties of a small gold probe, such as improved penetration.

Chromatographically Purified. Using gel filtration, it is possible to isolate monomeric Fab'–single Nanogold conjugates and to eliminate excess gold and other species.

Use on Gels. Conjugates are small enough to run on gels. The gold retards proteins by the approximate weight of the gold (~5 kD for undecagold and ~15 kD for Nanogold) (Weinstein et al. 1989 ; Hainfeld and Furuya 1995 ). One can then stain with Coomasssie and, in parallel with silver, track the labeling on a molecular basis (Gregori et al. 1997 ). In contrast, colloidal gold does not generally work in gels.

There are, however, some disadvantages of the gold cluster approach. First, silver enhancement is needed for many applications in order to "grow" the small gold size to more visible sizes (10–20 nm or larger). This is typically a simple procedure, however, just floating the grid on the developer for a few minutes. In addition, newer microscopes are able to visualize Nanogold without enhancement, such as on cell surfaces in the SEM. However, silver enhancement does add another variable, and achieving the desired mean product size may take several tries. In addition, if overdeveloped, some background appears. Second, the size distribution of metal particles after silver enhancement is larger than colloidal gold preparations with the same mean size. Finally, gold cluster conjugates are much more difficult to prepare than colloidal gold. Organic phosphines and gold clusters must be chemically synthesized and the gold and conjugates purified by several ultrafiltration and liquid chromatography runs.

Undecagold vs Nanogold vs Ultrasmall Gold
The larger Nanogold cluster (1.4-nm gold core) has several advantages over Au11 (0.8 nm): it is directly visible by TEM (and better SEMs) at high magnification, is stable in the beam, and it develops better with silver (Hainfeld and Furuya 1992 ). For most applications, therefore, Nanogold is the preferable choice.

It is possible to make colloidal gold in very small sizes, 1.0 nm or less, and proteins are adsorbed to these particles in the same way as with larger colloidal golds. Unfortunately these "ultrasmall gold" preparations have several disadvantages (Hainfeld 1990 ) compared to Nanogold: (a) the size distribution of gold particles is very large, usually ranging from 0.8 to 3.0 nm; (b) aggregation with antibodies tends to occur, so the conjugate, which contains multiple antibodies and gold particles is actually quite large, severely limiting penetration (Hainfeld 1990 ); and (c) the attachment is not covalent and is therefore less stable.

Labeling Reactions
The linking arm on the gold can be made to specifically react with thiols (e.g., cysteine residues on proteins), using a maleimide group, or with amino groups using an N-hydroxysuccinimide (Fig 3). Other specific reactions can be used to link to sugar groups in glycoproteins. These form stable covalent bonds and permit useful conjugates to be made, even with molecules that do not adsorb to colloidal gold.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Diagram of chemical reactions that covalently link gold clusters to specific groups. (A) Reaction of maleimido-Nanogold with a thiol (-SH group). (B) Reaction of sulfo-N-hydroxysuccinimide–Nanogold with an amine.

Nanogold is available as reagents that react with free thiols or amines. These can be used to make conjugates with primary antibodies or other molecules. The procedure for labeling is quite simple, and consists of mixing the reactive gold reagent with the molecule to be labeled, then, after several hours, purifying the conjugate by gel filtration chromatography, ultrafiltration, or dialysis (to remove unreacted gold or unlabeled molecules). More specifically, the protocol for labeling is as follows:

  1. Dissolve lyophilized Nanogold reagent by adding 1 ml water [contains dried buffer; final solution is PBS, pH 6.5 (maleimido) or 7.5 (Sulfo-NHS)].

  2. Mix with ~0.2 mg of protein to be labeled. If reacting with amines, no protein pretreatment is necessary. If making Fab' or IgG conjugates with maleimido–Nanogold, these must be prepared. For IgG, reduce with mercaptoethanolamine, to expose hinge sulfhydryls, and column purify; for Fab', digest with pepsin or ficin to get F(ab')2, then reduce and column-purify (to remove reducing agent).

  3. After 1–16 hr, gel-filter product (on, e.g., Pharmacia Superose 12 in PBS), to separate labeled protein from unreacted gold.

An example is the labeling of an Fab' fragment, shown diagrammatically in Fig 4. An electron micrograph of Fab' fragments labeled with Nanogold (after column chromatography to remove excess Nanogold reagent) is shown in Fig 5.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Schematic flow diagram for labeling the hinge thiol of an Fab' antibody fragment with a gold cluster. IgG is first digested to F(ab')2, then reduced to Fab'; gold cluster is then reacted with the free thiol at the hinge region.



View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Darkfield scanning transmission electron micrograph of Fab'–Nanogold. Arrows point to Fab' fragments and arrowheads to Nanogold particles. Bar = 10 nm.

Stoichiometry of Labeling
With colloidal gold, it is difficult to quantitate the amount of antibody bound per gold particle by UV-Vis spectroscopy because the gold dominates the spectral absorption. However, gold clusters are smaller and one Nanogold at 280 nm absorbs 1.4-fold as much as a single IgG molecule. In addition, the gold absorbs in the visible spectrum, whereas most proteins do not. Therefore, a simple calculation based on a UV-Visible spectrum (or measurements at two points, such as 280 and 420 nm) will yield the ratio of gold to antibody. For successful antibody labeling with Nanogold, this is close to 1:1. A more detailed discussion of the equations to use is found in Hainfeld 1989 . For Nanogold, the extinction coefficients are 2.25 x 105 M-1cm-1 at 280 nm and 1.12 x 105 M-1cm-1 at 420 nm.

Silver Enhancement
Silver enhancement, also called autometallography, is a process by which silver is deposited on the gold surface (Danscher et al. 1995 ). Because the metal particle acts as a catalyst, the plating is specific (Fig 6). Various silver salts, reducing agents, and moderators that can give better control (such as gum arabic), have been used; some formulations are better for EM or LM. The small gold particle can easily be grown to a useful size for EM (10–20 nm). Sometimes a larger size can be used for double labeling, e.g., to distinguish it from a smaller 10-nm colloidal gold (Takizawa and Robinson 1994 ), or so that labeling can be seen at very low EM magnification for easy screening of samples. Although very uniform particles have been reported after development (Krenacs and Krenacs 1995 ), in general the distribution of particle sizes after silver enhancement is worse than that from a good colloidal gold preparation, say of 10-nm size. However, the typical size distribution is completely acceptable for most applications (Fig 7).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Diagram of silver enhancement process.



View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Electron micrograph after silver enhancement of Nanogold–Fab' labeling, leading to ~10-nm particles. Specimen shows GABA-containing terminals (asterisks) forming symmetrical synaptic specializations (arrows) with dendrites (D) in the thoracic spinal cord of the rat. Postembedding staining was done using GABA antiserum (Incstar 1:2000, 4C, 18 hr), Nanogold–goat anti-rabbit Fab' (1:40 room temperature, 90 min), and intensified with HQ silver (Nanoprobes) for 6 min. Tissue was counterstained with lead citrate, and embedding resin was Durcupan (Fluka). Courtesy of S. Bacon, Oxford University, Dept. of Pharmacology, Oxford, UK.

Because osmium poststaining for EM can oxidize and reverse the silver staining, it was found that lower concentrations of OsO4 (0.1% for 30 min rather than 1%) does not affect the silver signal and still gives excellent staining (Burry et al. 1992 ). Another method has been to use gold toning, which coats the silver with gold, making it impervious to osmium (Sawada and Esaki 1994 ; Arai and Nagatsu 1995 ).


  Electron Microscopy
Top
Summary
Colloidal Gold
Gold Clusters
Discussion
Electron Microscopy
Summary
Literature Cited

Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy (STEM)
The darkfield high-resolution STEM is one of the best instruments for visualizing small gold clusters clearly. It has been used in projects where single proteins or protein complexes have been labeled (Wilkinson et al. 1994 ; Yang et al. 1994 ; Mosesson et al. 1998 ; Luo et al. 1999 ). For example, an undecagold–Fab' antibody to the carboxy terminus of the {gamma}-chain of fibrinogen mapped the locus of this site on the fibrinogen molecule (Fig 8).



View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Darkfield scanning transmission electron micrograph of a single fibrinogen molecule with an undecagold (arrow)-labeled Fab' targeted to the carboxy terminus of the {gamma}-chain. Diagram at right identifies structures.

Labeling Peptides
Small peptides do not adsorb well to colloidal gold but can be covalently attached to gold clusters by reacting a cysteine -SH group, or an amino (-NH2) group (either the {alpha}-amino or one from a lysine residue) (Fig 9). In one example, the 40-amino-acid amyloid ß-peptide, a peptide important in the development of Alzheimer's disease, was labeled with Nanogold (Gregori et al. 1997 ). The gold-labeled peptide was used to determine the peptide binding site in the proteasome (Fig 10).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. Scheme for labeling peptides with gold clusters. (A) Labeling a cysteine. (B) Labeling of an amine, either the terminal one ({alpha}) or that on a lysine.



View larger version (218K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 10. Negatively stained scanning transmission electron microscope image of proteasomes labeled with Nanogold–amyloid ß protein after column purification. Sample stained with methylamine vanadate (NanoVan; Nanoprobes). Arrows point to proteasomes with gold clusters: bar = 10 nm. Sample prepared by L. Gregori, Dept. of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, School of Medicine, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY.

In another example, the 11-amino-acid peptide substance P (SP) was labeled with Sulfo–NHS–Nanogold (Segond von Banchet and Heppelmann 1995 ). This was then used to visualize binding in the rat spinal cord and on gels. Comparison with the previously used technique of labeling the peptide with 125I gave identical results and the controls behaved similarly, such as competing off the labeled SP binding with excess unlabeled SP. This work is notable for two reasons. First, it shows that even a small peptide retained activity after gold labeling. Second, the lengthy (months to develop an autoradiograph), hazardous (radioactive), and low-resolution 125I labeling could be replaced with gold cluster labeling, which gave results the same day, was non-hazardous, and gave high-resolution information.

TEM
Many examples have now been reported in the literature of Nanogold labeling in tissue sections in the TEM, using both pre-embedding (Vandre and Burry 1992 ; Burry 1995 ; Nusser et al. 1995 ) and postembedding (Krenacs and Krenacs 1995 ). In general, the density of labeling is greater than with colloidal gold and the penetration many times better. One is best referred to this body of literature for specific details and protocols, which can be found in a reference list by topics on the Nanoprobes web site (http://www.nanoprobes.com). A useful comparative review of methods for the various techniques was recently published (Hainfeld and Powell 1997 ).

Light Microscopy
Use of silver-enhanced gold gives punctate, high-resolution detail that stands out against H&E and other cell stains. Because the small gold cluster immunoprobes or Nanogold–streptavidin penetrate into tissues up to 40 µm, this has led to many new applications for gold labeling for the LM. Although brightfield optics are usually adequate for viewing, reflected light (using crosspolarized epi-ilumination) can specifically identify the metal deposits because they repolarize the light upon reflection.

FluoroNanogold
For correlative light and electron microscopy, a dual label containing both a fluorophore and gold would be advantageous. The use of two separate immunolabels in parallel experiments (fluorescent in one and the gold in the other) has been unsatisfactory in many cases because different localizations are frequently seen. It also demands two preparations. Fluorescent and gold probes would also be useful for screening to see that labeling is successful at the LM level before proceeding (with the same sample) to the more extensive EM preparation. Another application of a dual probe is to follow a process in living cells, and when the fluorescent image indicates the time of interest, cells can be fixed and examined at the ultrastructural EM level. Combined fluorescent and colloidal gold probes have had limited success because gold particles strongly quench the fluorescence, and large gold particle sizes are worse. The quenching depends also on the distance between fluorophore and gold, so that they must be spaced apart at an appropriate distance.

Combined fluorescent and gold probes have been prepared by attaching both Nanogold and fluorescein (Powell et al. 1997 ; Robinson and Vandre 1997 ) or Cy3 (Keohane et al. 1999 ; Powell et al. 1999b ) to Fab' and streptavidin. It was found that attaching the fluorophore directly to Nanogold led to excessive quenching, so instead the Nanogold is attached to the hinge region thiol of an Fab' antibody fragment, and the fluorophore to a reactive amino group (Fig 11) (Powell et al. 1997 ). By using an Fab' fragment, the size of the whole conjugate is kept smaller than an IgG, so penetration into tissues and sections is excellent (Robinson and Vandre 1997 ). It has been possible with FluoroNanogold to visualize antigens in the same cell by light and electron microscopy (Powell et al. 1997 , Powell et al. 1998 ; Takizawa et al. 1998 ). FluoroNanogold has also been made with streptavidin, so that biotinylated DNA or biotinylated primaries can be targeted. The original FluoroNanogold is Nanogold combined with fluorescein, which fluoresces green. Cy3–Nanogold is now available, which has a red color. Cy3 also has the advantages of better water solubility, greater brightness, and reduced bleaching (Powell et al. 1998 , Powell et al. 1999b ).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 11. Diagram of construction of FluoroNanogold–Fab' probe.

Two other reports in this issue detail applications of FluoroNanogold, and the reader is referred to them for further information and experimental details: T. Takizawa and J.M. Robinson, "FluoroNanogold is a bifunctional immunoprobe for correlative fluorescence and electron microscopy," and J.M. Robinson, T. Takizawa, and D.D. Vandré, "Enhanced labeling efficiency using ultrasmall immunogold probes: immunocytochemistry."

Metallosomes
Gold clusters, because they can be covalently linked with almost any other molecule, can be attached to phospholipids or fatty acids (Hainfeld 1996 ). This gives a long hydrophobic tail with the water-soluble gold on the head group (Fig 12). These molecules behave similarly to native lipids, and on sonication, for example, form micelles and vesicles (Fig 13). If they are mixed with unmodified lipids to "spike" liposomes, they can be used to follow the liposomes (Thurston et al. 1998 ), and have been so used to demonstrate targeted drug delivery (Adler-Moore 1994 ). The golden lipids also form monolayers on an air–water interface and can be compressed to form regular gold arrays (Hainfeld et al. 1999a ).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 12. Scale diagram of Nanogold–phospholipid (dipalmatoylphosphatidylethanolamine, DPPE).



View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 13. Darkfield scanning transmission electron micrograph of Nanogold–phospholipid after sonication. Bar = 20 nm.

In Situ Hybridization
Certain genes or sequences can be detected in cells, and this is important for both basic studies and pathology. For example, HPV-16 (human papilloma virus) is highly correlated with cervical cancer (Cheung et al. 1999 ), and gene amplification of Her/2-neu is important in prognosis and treatment of breast cancer. Although fluorescent and colorometric ISH tests are used, gold detection gives an excellent black staining compatible with the use of other full-strength cell stains for LM. Compared with fluorescence, there is no autofluorescence to worry about, no expensive fluorescent optics, and the slide is permanent and does not bleach or fade with observation or storage. Using the CARD (catalyzed reporter deposition) method and streptavidin–Nanogold, single copy gene detection has been routinely achieved (Zehbe et al. 1997 ).

Gels and Blots
With silver enhancement, signals from immunogold targeting, for example, may be seen by eye on blots, as shown in Fig 14. Nanogold has shown to give particularly sensitive detection, rivaling or exceeding limits of fluorescent, radioactive, enzyme-colorometric, and chemiluminescent methods (Hainfeld and Furuya 1992 ). Another use, suggested by Burry 1995 , is to spot dilutions of the Nanogold–antibody conjugate on nitrocellulose paper, then silver-develop. The graded response is used to determine the optimal silver enhancement time for EM or LM samples.



View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 14. Sensitive dot blot using Nanogold–Fab' and silver enhancement. Nanogold–antimouse Fab' was incubated with dilutions of mouse IgG spotted on nitrocellulose, washed, and developed with LI Silver (Nanoprobes). Arrow points to spot detecting 0.1 pg of IgG. Lower right panel is control with just buffer spots.

Colloidal gold is generally too large to enter into polyacrylamide gels. However, gold clusters (undecagold ~5 kD and Nanogold ~15 kD) attached to proteins shift the weight by approximately that amount. This means that Coomassie blue staining can be used to visualize proteins, and silver staining will reveal the gold-labeled bands (using a parallel gel, or a lane cut lengthwise, half for Coomassie, half for silver) (Hainfeld and Furuya 1995 ; Gregori et al. 1997 ).

New Developments
Metal probes that can be covalently linked to biomolecules open up many possibilities for making novel probes for light and electron microscopy or other applications. Different molecules can be attached or different sized metal particles used, as well as a variety of metals in place of gold. Some of these are briefly described below.

Ni–NTA–Nanogold
Cloned proteins frequently have a 6x-His tag (6 histidine tail) engineered in, which binds to a nickel column for one-step purifications from cell lysates. The nickel is held to the column material via the chelator NTA (nitrilotriacetic acid). This chelator has been attached to Nanogold, then charged with Ni2+ ions, so that the Nanogold then binds to 6x-His tagged proteins (Fig 15) (Hainfeld et al. 1999c ).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 15. Schematic diagram of gold cluster with Ni–NTA group attached for binding 6xHis-tagged proteins.

ATP–Gold
ATP or its analogues linked to gold clusters can be used in several ways. One is to label nucleotide binding proteins. Another is to serve as a substrate for a polymerase or DNA synthesizer to incorporate gold into nucleic acid probes. An ATP–gold cluster conjugate has recently been described (Hainfeld et al. 1999b ).

Larger Platinum and Palladium Clusters
These clusters are based on 1,10-phenanthroline ligands instead of the phosphines used in gold clusters. Clusters ~2 nm contain ~200 heavy atoms, and clusters 2.4 nm (Pd561) and 3.6 nm (Pd2057) have been described. The advantages of these structures include the use of a different metal for spectroscopic detection and larger sizes for better visibility (Powell et al. 1999a ).

Thiol–Gold
In addition to phosphine-stabilized gold particles, ligands bound to the gold core via a sulfur donor are also stable and may prove useful (Brust et al. 1994 ; Buining et al. 1997 ; Chen and Kimura 1999 ). An Ni-NTA cluster that binds 6x-His tags was prepared this way using a thiol-containing dipeptide (Hainfeld et al. 1999c ).

Tetra Iridium
Clusters with four iridium atoms have been synthesized and linked to antibodies, viruses (Cheng et al. 1999 ), and other proteins (Fig 16). This small cluster may be useful for higher-resolution labeling and as an isomorphous replacement in the X-ray phasing of large unit cell protein crystals (Weinstein et al. 1989 ; Weinstein et al. 1999 ).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 16. Tetra iridium cluster diagram, Ir4(CO)8(PR3)3(PR2R'). Dense metal Ir4 core is ~0.5 nm, whereas the overall diameter, including the phosphines (PR3), is 1.7 nm.

Gold Developer
Silver enhancement has proved to be quite useful to amplify the signal from small gold particles. In a similar fashion, gold can be catalytically deposited on the targeted gold particles (Fig 17). Gold enhancement has a number of potential advantages compared to silver. It can safely be used before osmium tetroxide staining (it is inert to osmium), lower backgrounds are observed in many cases and, for SEM, gold gives a significantly higher backscatter signal (Hainfeld et al. 1999d ).



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 17. Gold development diagram. Small gold particle specifically nucleates additional gold deposition from solution, enlarging the particle for better detection.


  Summary
Top
Summary
Colloidal Gold
Gold Clusters
Discussion
Electron Microscopy
Summary
Literature Cited

Metal cluster labeling offers significant performance improvements over labeling with colloidal gold in the conventional manner, including more quantitative labeling and improved labeling of macromolecules and antigens in cells and tissues. The covalent crosslinking rationale and the ability to selectively modify the reactivity of metal cluster labels have enabled the preparation of new types of probes that are not feasible with colloidal gold. The development of combined fluorescent- and metal cluster-labeled probes has enabled more precise correlative microscopy, and the variety of different metals and cluster functionalities now available has significantly widened the applications of gold labeling.


  Footnotes

Presented in part at the New Frontiers in Gold Labeling Symposium, 5th Joint Meeting of the Japan Society of Histochemistry and the Histochemical Society, University of California–San Diego, July 23–26, 1998.


  Acknowledgments

Supported by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research of the US Department of Energy under Prime Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with Brookhaven National Laboratory, by National Institutes of Health Grant 2 P41 RR01777, and by NIH Small Business Innovation Research grants GM 48328, GM 49564, and GM 56090.

We wish to thank Dr Martha Simon, Ms Beth Lin, and Mr Frank Kito for STEM operation, and Dr Joseph Wall for helpful discussions. We are grateful to Carol M. R. Halsey, Vishwas Joshi, and Frederic Furuya for helpful experimental discussions, and to Gerhard W. Hacker for experimental data on gold enhancement and combined Cy3 and Nanogold probes.

Received for publication November 27, 1999; accepted December 1, 1999.


  Literature Cited
Top
Summary
Colloidal Gold
Gold Clusters
Discussion
Electron Microscopy
Summary
Literature Cited

Adler–Moore J (1994) AmBisome targeting to fungal infections. Bone Marrow Transplant 14:S3-7[Medline]

Arai R, Nagatsu I (1995) Application of gold toning to immunogold-silver staining. In Hayat MA, ed. Immunogold Silver Staining: Principles, Methods and Applications. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, 211-216

Bartlett PA, Bauer B, Singer SJ (1978) Synthesis of water-soluble undecagold cluster compounds of potential importance in electron microscopic and other studies of biological systems. J Am Chem Soc 100:5085-5089

Brust M, Walker M, Bethell D, Schiffren DJ, Whyman R (1994) Synthesis of thiol-derivatized gold nanoparticles in a 2-phase liquid-liquid system. J Chem Soc Chem Commun 801–802

Buining PA, Humbel BM, Philipse AP, Verkleij AJ (1997) Preparation of functional silane-stabilized gold colloids in the (sub)nanometer size range. Langmuir 13:3921-3926

Burry RW (1995) Pre-embedding immunocytochemistry with silver-enhanced small gold particles. In Hayat MA, ed. Immunogold Silver Staining: Principles, Methods and Applications. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, 217-230

Burry RW, Vandre DD, Hayes DM (1992) Silver enhancement of gold antibody probes in pre-embedding electron microscopic immunocytochemistry. J Histochem Cytochem 40:1849-1856[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chen S, Kimura K (1999) Synthesis and characterization of carboxylate-modified gold nanoparticle powders dispersible in water. Langmuir 15:1075-1082

Cheng N, Conway JF, Watts NR, Hainfeld JF, Joshi V, Powell RD, Stahl SJ, Wingfield PE, Steven AC (1999) Tetrairidium, a 4-atom cluster, is readily visible as a density label in 3-dimensional cryo-EM maps of proteins at 10-25 A resolution. J Struct Biol 127:169-176[Medline]

Cheung AL, Graf AH, Hauser–Kronberger C, Dietze O, Tubbs RR, Hacker GW (1999) Detection of human papillomavirus in cervical carcinoma: comparison of peroxidase, Nanogold, and catalyzed reporter deposition (CARD)-Nanogold in situ hybridization. Mod Pathol 12:689-696[Medline]

Danscher G, Hacker GW, Hauser–Kronberger C, Grimelius L (1995) Trends in autometallographic silver amplification of colloidal gold particles. In Hayat MA, ed. Immunogold Silver Staining: Principles, Methods and Applications. New York, CRC Press, 11-18

Faulk WP, Taylor GM (1971) An immunocolloid method for the electron microscope. Immunochemistry 8:1081-1083[Medline]

Gregori L, Hainfeld JF, Simon MN, Goldgaber D (1997) Binding of amyloid beta protein to the 20 S proteasome. J Biol Chem 272:58-62[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hainfeld J (1990) STEM analysis of Janssen Aurooprobe One. In Bailey G, ed. Proc XIIth Int Congr Electron Microsc. San Francisco, San Francisco Press, 954-955

Hainfeld JF (1987) A small gold-conjugated antibody label: improved resolution for electron microscopy. Science 236:450-453[Medline]

Hainfeld JF (1989) Undecagold-antibody method. In Hayat MA, ed. Colloidal Gold: Principles, Methods, and Applications. Vol 2. San Diego, CA, Academic Press, 413-429

Hainfeld JF (1996) Gold Liposomes. In Bailey GW, Corbett JM, Dimlich RVW, Michael JR, Zaluzec NJ, eds. Proc 54th Annu Mtg Microsc Soc Am. San Francisco, San Francisco Press, 898-899

Hainfeld JF, Furuya FR (1992) A 1.4-nm gold cluster covalently attached to antibodies improves immunolabeling. J Histochem Cytochem 40:177-184[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hainfeld JF, Furuya FR (1995) Silver enhancement of Nanogold and undecagold. In Hayat MA, ed. Immunogold Silver Staining: Principles, Methods and Applications. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, 71-96

Hainfeld JF, Furuya FR, Powell RD (1999a) Metallosomes. J Struct Biol 127:152-160[Medline]

Hainfeld JF, Liu W, Barcena M (1999b) Gold-ATP. J Struct Biol 127:120-134[Medline]

Hainfeld JF, Liu W, Halsey CMR, Freimuth P, Powell RD (1999c) Ni-NTA-gold clusters target His-tagged proteins. J Struct Biol 127:185-198[Medline]

Hainfeld JF, Powell RD (1997) Nanogold technology: new frontiers in gold labeling. Cell Vis 4:408-432

Hainfeld JF, Powell RD, Stein JK, Hacker GW, Hauser–Kronberger C, Cheung ALM (1999d) Gold-based autometallography. In Bailey GW, Jerome WG, McKernan S, Mansfield JF, eds. Proc 57th Annu Mtg Microsc Soc Am. New York, Springer-Verlag, 486-487

Handley DA (1989) The development and application of colloidal gold as a microscopic probe. In Hayat MA, ed. Colloidal Gold: Principles, Methods, and Applications. Vol 1. San Diego, Academic Press, 1-32

Horisberger M (1989) Qantitative aspects of labeling colloidal gold with proteins. In Verkleij AJ, Leunissen JLM, eds. Immuno-gold Labeling in Cell Biology. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, 49-60

Keohane EM, Orr GA, Takvorian PM, Cali A, Tanowitz HB, Wittner M, Weiss LM (1999) Polar tube proteins of microsporidia of the family encephalitozoonidae. J Eukaryot Microbiol 46:1-5[Medline]

Kramarcy NR, Sealock R (1991) Commercial preparations of colloidal gold-antibody complexes frequently contain free active antibody. J Histochem Cytochem 39:37-39[Abstract]

Krenács T, Krenács L (1995) Comparison of embedding media for immunogold-silver staining. In Hayat MA, ed. Immunogold Silver Staining: Principles, Methods and Applications. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, 57-70

Lipka JJ, Hainfeld JF, Wall JS (1983) Undecagold labeling of a glycoprotein: STEM visualization of an undecagoldphosphine cluster labeling the carbohydrate sites of human haptoglobin-hemoglobin complex. J Ultrastruct Res 84:120-129[Medline]

Luo RZ, Beniac DR, Fernandes A, Yip CC, Ottensmeyer FP (1999) Quaternary structure of the insulin-insulin receptor complex. Science 285:1077-1080[Abstract/Free Full Text]

McPartlin M, Mason R, Malatesta L (1969) Novel cluster complexes of gold(0)-gold(1). J Chem Soc Chem Commun 334

Mosesson MW, Siebenlist KR, Meh DA, Wall JS, Hainfeld JF (1998) The location of the carboxy-terminal region of gamma chains in fibrinogen and fibrin D domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:10511-10516[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nusser Z, Roberts JD, Baude A, Richards JG, Somogyi P (1995) Relative densities of synaptic and extrasynaptic GABAA receptors on cerebellar granule cells as determined by a quantitative immunogold method. J Neurosci 15:2948-2960[Abstract]

Powell RD, Halsey CM, Hainfeld JF (1998) Combined fluorescent and gold immunoprobes: reagents and methods for correlative light and electron microscopy. Microsc Res Tech 42:2-12[Medline]

Powell RD, Halsey CMR, Liu W, Joshi V, Hainfeld JF (1999a) Giant platinum clusters: 2 nm covalent metal cluster labels. J Struct Biol 127:177-184[Medline]

Powell RD, Halsey CM, Spector DL, Kaurin SL, McCann J, Hainfeld JF (1997) A covalent fluorescent-gold immunoprobe: simultaneous detection of a pre-mRNA splicing factor by light and electron microscopy. J Histochem Cytochem 45:947-956[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Powell RD, Joshi VN, Halsey CMR, Hainfeld JF, Hacker GW, Hauser-Kronberger C, Muss WH, Takvorian PM (1999b) Combined Cy3/Nanogold conjugates for immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization. In Bailey GW, Jerome WG, McKernan S, Mansfield JF, eds. Proc 57th Annu Mtg Microsc Soc Am. New York, Springer-Verlag, 478-479

Reardon JE, Frey PA (1984) Synthesis of undecagold cluster molecules as biochemical labeling reagents. 1. Monoacyl and mono[N-(succinimidooxy)succinyl] undecagold clusters. Biochemistry 23:3849-3856[Medline]

Robinson JM, Vandre DD (1997) Efficient immunocytochemical labeling of leukocyte microtubules with FluoroNanogold: an important tool for correlative microscopy. J Histochem Cytochem 45:631-642[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Safer D, Bolinger L, Leigh JS, Jr (1986) Undecagold clusters for site-specific labeling of biological macromolecules: simplified preparation and model applications. J Inorg Biochem 26:77-91[Medline]

Sawada H, Esaki H (1994) Use of Nanogold followed by silver enhancement and gold toning for preembedding immunolocalization in osmium-fixed, epon-embedded tissues. J Electron Microsc 43:361-366[Medline]

Schmid G (1988) Metal clusters and cluster metals. Polyhedron 7:2321-2329

Schnyder T, Tittmann P, Winkler H, Gross H, Wallimann T (1995) Localization of reactive cysteine residues by maleidoyl undecagold in the mitochondrial creatine kinase octamer. J Struct Biol 114:209-217[Medline]

Segond von Banchet G, Heppelmann B (1995) Non-radioactive localization of substance P binding sites in rat brain and spinal cord using peptides labeled with 1.4-nm gold particles. J Histochem Cytochem 43:821-827[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Skripkin E, Yusupova G, Yusupov M, Kessler P, Ehresmann C, Ehresmann B (1993) Synthesis and ribosome binding properties of model mRNAs modified with undecagold cluster. Bioconjug Chem 4:549-553[Medline]

Sun XJ, Tolbert LP, Hildebrand JG (1995) Using laser scanning confocal microscopy as a guide for electron microscopic study: a simple method for correlation of light and electron microscopy. J Histochem Cytochem 43:329-335[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Takizawa T, Robinson JM (1994) Use of 1.4-nm immunogold particles for immunocytochemistry on ultra-thin cryosections. J Histochem Cytochem 42:1615-1623[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Takizawa T, Suzuki K, Robinson JM (1998) Correlative microscopy using FluoroNanogold on ultrathin cryosections. Proof of principle. J Histochem Cytochem 46:1097-1102[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Thurston G, McLean JW, Rizen M, Baluk P, Haskell A, Murphy TJ, Hanahan D, McDonald DM (1998) Cationic liposomes target angiogenic endothelial cells in tumors and chronic inflammation in mice. J Clin Invest 101:1401-1413[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vandre DD, Burry RW (1992) Immunoelectron microscopic localization of phosphoproteins associated with the mitotic spindle. J Histochem Cytochem 40:1837-1847[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vargaftik MN, Zagorodnikov VP, Stolyarov IP, Moiseev II, Likholobov VA, Kochubey DI, Chuvilin AL, Zaikovsky VI, Zamaraev KI, Timofeeva GI (1985) A novel giant palladium cluster. J Chem Soc Commun 937–939

Weinstein S, Jahn W, Glotz C, Schlunzen F, Levin I, Janell D, Harms J, Kolln I, Hansen HA, Gluhmann M, Bennett WS, Bartels H, Bashan A, Agmon I, Kessler M, Pioletti M, Avila H, Anagnostopoulos K, Peretz M, Auerbach T, Franceschi F, Yonath A (1999) Metal compounds as tools for the construction and the interpretation of medium-resolution maps of ribosomal particles. J Struct Biol 127:141-151[Medline]

Weinstein S, Jahn W, Hansen H, Wittmann HG, Yonath A (1989) Novel procedures for derivatization of ribosomes for crystallographic studies. J Biol Chem 264:19138-19142[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wenzel T, Baumeister W (1995) Conformational constraints in protein degradation by the 20S proteasome. Nature Struct Biol 2:199-204[Medline]

Wilkinson DA, Marion TN, Tillman DM, Norcum MT, Hainfeld JF, Seyer JM, Carlson GM (1994) An epitope proximal to the carboxyl terminus of the alpha-subunit is located near the lobe tips of the phosphorylase kinase hexadecamer. J Mol Biol 235:974-982[Medline]

Yang YS, Datta A, Hainfeld JF, Furuya FR, Wall JS, Frey PA (1994) Mapping the lipoyl groups of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex by use of gold cluster labels and scanning transmission electron microscopy. Biochemistry 33:9428-9437[Medline]

Zehbe I, Hacker GW, Su H, Hauser–Kronberger C, Hainfeld JF, Tubbs R (1997) Sensitive in situ hybridization with catalyzed reporter deposition, streptavidin-Nanogold, and silver acetate autometallography: detection of single-copy human papillomavirus. Am J Pathol 150:1553-1561. [see comments][Abstract]

Zlotnick A, Cheng N, Stahl SJ, Conway JF, Steven AC, Wingfield PT (1997) Localization of the C terminus of the assembly domain of hepatitis B virus capsid protein: implications for morphogenesis and organization of encapsidated RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:9556-9561[Abstract/Free Full Text]