ARTICLE |
Correspondence to: Doris Kloor, Dept. of Pharmacology, Wilhelmstr. 56, D-72074 Tübingen, Germany.
![]() |
Summary |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) hydrolase is a cytosolic enzyme present in the kidney. Enzyme activities of SAH hydrolase were measured in the kidney in isolated glomeruli and tubules. SAH hydrolase activity was 0.62 ± 0.02 mU/mg in the kidney, 0.32 ± 0.03 mU/mg in the glomeruli, and 0.50 ± 0.02 mU/mg in isolated tubules. Using immunohistochemical methods, we describe the localization of the enzyme SAH hydrolase in rat kidney with a highly specific antibody raised in rabbits against purified SAH hydrolase from bovine kidney. This antibody crossreacts to almost the same extent with the SAH hydrolase from different species such as rat, pig, and human. Using light microscopy, SAH hydrolase was visualized by the biotinstreptavidinalkaline phosphatase immunohistochemical procedure. SAH hydrolase immunostaining was observed in glomeruli and in the epithelium of the proximal and distal tubules. The collecting ducts of the cortex and medulla were homogeneously stained. By using double immunofluorescence staining and two-channel immunofluorescence confocal laser scanning microscopy, we differentiated the glomerular cells (endothelium, mesangium, podocytes) and found intensive staining of podocytes. Our results show that the enzyme SAH hydrolase is found ubiquitously in the rat kidney. The prominent staining of SAH hydrolase in the podocytes may reflect high rates of transmethylation. (J Histochem Cytochem 48:211218, 2000)
Key Words: S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase, enzyme activity, immunohistochemistry, glomerulus, podocyte, confocal LSM, fluorescence
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The cytoplasmatic enzyme S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase (E.C. 3.3.1.1) functions at an important branching point in the cytosolic metabolism, linking processes of transmethylation (
The distribution of SAH hydrolase in various tissues of the rat was investigated by
![]() |
Materials and Methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Materials
The following materials were purchased from the different sources indicated: Protran B 85 nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher & Schuell, Dusseldorf, Germany); biotinylated antibody against rabbit IgG, streptavidinalkaline phosphatasebiotin (ABC) complex, new fuchsin chromogen, 0.1% avidin, 0.01% biotin (Dako; Glostrup, Denmark); monoclonal mouse anti-rat THY-1 antibody (Seikagaku; Tokyo, Japan); mouse anti-human von Willebrand factor (vWF), adenosine deaminase, nucleoside phosphorylase, xanthin oxidase, and clostridiopeptidase A (Boehringer Mannheim; Mannheim, Germany); anti-mouse and anti-rabbit antibodies labeled with Texas Red and Cy5 (Dianova; Hamburg, Germany; SAH, bovine serum albumin (BSA), and 4-chloro-1-naphthol (Sigma; St Louis, MO); O-toluidine (Aldrich; Milwaukee, WI); MTT (3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium-bromide) (Serva; Heidelberg, Germany). All other reagents were of analytical grade and were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).
Human kidney tissue was obtained according to the Helsinki guidelines from patients who had undergone nephrectomy because of renal cell carcinoma in the Department of Surgery at Robert-Bosch Hospital, Stuttgart.
Enzyme Purification
SAH hydrolase was purified from bovine kidney using chromatographical techniques as described previously (
Protein Assay
Protein concentration was determined according to the method of
Isolation of Glomeruli
Glomeruli were isolated using a modified sieving method according to
Isolation of Tubules
Tubules were isolated by collagenase digestion. The kidney was diced with scissors and incubated for 45 min at room temperature (RT) in a 0.4% collagenase solution (115 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 10 mM Na-acetate, 1.2 mM NaH2PO4, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 1 mM CaCl2, and 25 mM NaHCO3). After the incubation, the mixture was sieved through a 320-µm sieve and washed with physiological saline solution to remove adherent collagenase. The tubules were collected after centrifugation at 1000 x g for 20 min.
Enzyme Assay
SAH hydrolase activity was assayed in the crude homogenate in the hydrolytic direction. The reaction mixture (1 ml) contained 50 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.0, 50 µl homogenate, 1 mM MTT, 0.14% gelatin, 1.0 U adenosine deaminase, 0.8 U nucleoside phosphorylase, and 0.8 U xanthine oxidase. This reaction mixture was incubated for 5 min at RT to remove all endogenous substrates that might react with the added enzymes. After this incubation, the reaction for specific determination of SAH hydrolase activity was started by the addition of 80 µM SAH. The formation of formazan was measured at 578 nm.
Preparation of Antibodies
Antibody against bovine SAH hydrolase was raised in rabbits by multisite SC injections of an emulsion of the enzyme (100150 µg protein) prepared by mixing equal volumes of protein and Freund's complete adjuvant (Sigma). After 4 and 8 weeks, the animal received an SC booster injection of 0.5 mg enzyme prepared as above with incomplete Freund's adjuvant (Sigma). The animals were bled 7 days after the last injection. Serum was centrifuged at 3500 x g for 20 min and stored at -20C. The specificity of the antibody was examined by testing its ability to precipitate enzyme activity from SAH hydrolase and by Western blotting.
Western Blot Analysis
Rat, bovine, and human kidney tissues were homogenized in 2 volumes of 8% sucrose containing 50 mM potassium phosphate, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM EDTA, and 100 µM PMSF and were centrifuged at 50,000 x g for 60 min at 4C. The supernatants were separated by SDS-PAGE according to
Immunoprecipitation of Purified SAH Hydrolase
SAH hydrolase from bovine and rat kidney (50 µg/ml) was incubated with 10, 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, and 150 µl anti-SAH hydrolase sera. The SAH hydrolase activity was assayed in the hydrolytic direction as mentioned above and was expressed as a percentage of the residual enzyme activity.
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemistry was performed using the biotinstreptavidinalkaline phosphatase complex technique. Cryostat sections from kidneys of SpragueDawley rats (10 µm) were fixed with acetone for 10 min at RT and air-dried. The sections were washed for 30 min in TBS (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6). Nonspecific background staining was reduced by preincubating sections for 1 hr with 5% normal goat serum at RT. The sections were incubated with the polyclonal antibody against SAH hydrolase (1:100 dilution) overnight at RT. After rinsing, the sections were incubated with the biotinylated antibody (1:300 dilution) against rabbit IgG for 1 hr at RT. The sections were washed in TBS and incubated for 10 min with 0.1% avidin in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, to reduce the endogenous biotin. The avidin solution was then rinsed off and the slices were incubated for 10 min with 0.01% biotin in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6 (Woods and Warnke 1981). Then the sections were incubated with biotinstreptavidinalkaline phosphatase complex for 30 min at RT. Color was developed with 0.05% new fuchsin in TBS and 0.03% naphthol-phosphate dissolved in N,N-dimethylformamide. To reduce endogenous alkaline phosphatase activity, the color developing mixture contained 1 mM levamisole. The slices were counterstained with hematoxylin, mounted with a water-soluble coverslip, and photographed with a light microscope (Zeiss; Oberkochen, Germany). Control slices were prepared by using antiserum preabsorbed with SAH hydrolase.
For the double-immunofluorescence staining study, we used antiserum against SAH hydrolase, a mouse monoclonal antibody (MAb) against THY-1, and a mouse MAb against vWF. Sections were incubated simultaneously with a cocktail of antibodies against SAH hydrolase (1:100 dilution) and against THY 1 (1:150 dilution), and with a cocktail of antibodies against SAH hydrolase (1:100 dilution) and against vWF (1:100 dilution). Then the slices were incubated with indodicarbocyanin (Cy5) conjugated anti-rabbit IgG and with Texas Red-conjugated anti-mouse IgG for 1 hr at RT. The sections were examined with a two-channel fluorescence confocal LSM. The crossreactivity of the anti-mouse IgG with the rabbit IgG and the anti-rabbit IgG with the mouse IgG was determined by dot-blot analysis. To evaluate the background staining, sections were stained only with the fluorescent conjugates.
Data Calculation and Statistics
Data are expressed as mean value ± SEM. For statistical analysis, Student's t-test for unpaired data was used and p values of <0.05 were considered to be significant.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The isolation of distinct morphological regions of the kidney with different physiological functions allows a quantitative assessment of the distribution of SAH hydrolase activity. With the sieving method, the glomeruli were clearly separated from tubule fragments and cells. The purity of the glomerular preparation was about 96%. The sieving procedure removed the Bowman capsule from glomeruli. The average diameter of glomeruli was 100 µm. Tubules were isolated by collagenase digestion of rat kidney. The purity of the tubule fragments was about 85%.
The specific enzymatic activity of SAH hydrolase determined in the entire kidney was 0.62 ± 0.02 mU/mg (n = 13). The SAH hydrolase activity of the glomerular preparation was 0.32 ± 0.03 mU/mg (n = 11) and was therefore 50% lower than the activity of the entire kidney, whereas the tubule preparation showed an enzyme activity of 0.50 ± 0.02 mU/mg (n = 10).
To localize SAH hydrolase at the cellular level in the kidney, we performed immunohistochemistry on cryostat sections of rat kidney. The specificity of the anti-SAH hydrolase antibody used in this study and the ability of the antiserum prepared against the purified SAH hydrolase from bovine kidney to crossreact with the SAH hydrolase from different species were examined by Western blot analysis of kidney homogenates from bovine, pig, rat, and human (Figure 1). The anti-bovine SAH hydrolase antibody from bovine kidneys reacted only with a single band in all the kidney extracts examined. The molecular weights of the SAH hydrolase monomers for bovine, pig, and human kidney were similar, with a mass of 47.5 kD, whereas the monomer of rat SAH hydrolase showed a band at 45 kD. The immunological titration of SAH hydrolase activity from bovine and rat kidney with the antiserum (Figure 2) revealed complete inactivation of enzyme activity.
|
|
Immunostaining of SAH hydrolase appeared to be relatively uniform (Figure 3). In the cortex, homogeneous staining was observed in the epithelium of proximal and distal tubules (Figure 3A). In addition, collecting ducts and loops of Henle from the medulla were homogeneously stained. Glomeruli showed the same staining intensity compared with the surrounding tubules. The staining was completely blocked by preincubation of the antibody with the SAH hydrolase (Figure 3B).
|
To differentiate the type of cells that express SAH hydrolase in the glomeruli, double labeling immunofluorescence was used with (a) the polyclonal antibody against SAH hydrolase and the MAb against THY-1 and (b) the polyclonal antibody against SAH hydrolase and the MAb against von Willebrand factor. Anti-THY-1 antibody binds to THY-1 antigen on rat glomerular mesangial cells (
Figure 4 shows fluorescence images of rat glomeruli, depicting the distributions of SAH hydrolase (green) and THY-1 (red). Staining for SAH hydrolase (green) was detectable in cells that were characterized as mesangial cells by THY-1 staining (red), and resulted in an orange aspect (Figure 4C). The same was done for endothelial cells marked by anti-von Willebrand factor (Figure 5). In addition, both double staining procedures showed a cell type that was positive only for anti SAH hydrolase. This green staining (Figure 4 and Figure 5) was concluded to represent the podocytes.
|
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
This study examined the distribution of SAH hydrolase in normal rat kidney by two different methods: assessment of enzymatic activity and immunohistochemistry.
SAH hydrolase activity was determined in the whole kidney and in isolated glomeruli and tubules. SAH hydrolase activity of isolated tubules is slightly but not significantly lower than that of the whole-kidney homogenate. At least two factors may be responsible for this difference. First, a partial loss of cellular integrity may be due to the isolation procedure used, which led to leakage of the cytoplasmatic enzyme. Second, the blood vessels that showed more intense staining were removed by the isolation procedure. In addition, the similar enzyme activities in tubules and the whole-kidney homogenate imply that cells of the renal medulla are similarly equipped with SAH hyrolase activity because the preparation of tubules contained mainly cortical tissue. Because the glomeruli contribute to whole-kidney protein by only 4.9% (
By Western blotting, the polyclonal antibody against the purified SAH hydrolase from bovine kidney reacted with the enzyme that was used for immunization and showed a crossreaction with the SAH hydrolase from pig, rat, and human kidney. This result is in accordance with the structural similarities of the SAH hydrolase in different species. The amino acid sequences for rat liver and human placenta SAH hydrolase are reported to be 97% homologous (
SAH hydrolase immunostaining shows a homogeneous distribution of the enzyme in the rat kidney. The activity of SAH hydrolase in glomeruli is 1.5-fold that in tubules. The ratio of the reduced to the oxidized form of the nucleotide (NADH/NAD+) on SAH hydrolase in the cells might be responsible for the difference in staining intensity and enzyme activity of SAH hydrolase. The antibody identifies the enzyme through several epitopes, whereas measurement of enzyme activity can determine only the rate of SAH hydrolysis but not the SAH hydrolase protein concentration. As has previously been shown (
To differentiate the SAH hydrolase content in the different cells of glomeruli, cryosections of a whole kidney were examined by LS microscopy. To discriminate more precisely between podocytes and mesangium, double staining was used, and it was possible to clearly demonstrate that mesangial cells also express SAH hydrolase. To further discriminate between endothelial cells and podocytes in single glomerulus capillary loops, double staining with von Willebrand factor and SAH hydrolase was used. The result clearly shows that SAH hydrolase is also present in endothelial cells. These observations, even in the absence of podocyte double staining, strongly favor the conclusion that the intense green staining shown in Figure 4C and Figure 5C represents other cells than podocytes. However, evidence for podocytes is provided by the localization of these cells outside the glomerular interstitium and near the glomerular basement membrane.
Podocytes stabilize the folding pattern of glomerular capillaries by fixing the turning points of the glomerular basement membrane to neighboring capillaries (
For the possible physiological role of SAH hydrolase, it is important to mention that protein methylation in the kidney may be involved in the action of aldosterone on tubules (
The data show that SAH hydrolase activity is present in the whole kidney, glomeruli, and tubules. Differentiation of glomeruli cells by double staining revealed that SAH hydrolase immunoreactivity is present in endothelial cells, mesangial cells, and podocytes. Further study is required to determine whether different transmethylation activities in tubules under physiological and pathophysiological conditions are associated with different distribution patterns of SAH hydrolase in the kidney.
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
Supported by a grant from the Federal Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Technology (Fö. 01 KS 9602) and by the Interdisciplinary Clinical Research Center (IKFZ) Tübingen.
Received for publication July 29, 1999; accepted September 8, 1999.
![]() |
Literature Cited |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Andrews P, Bates SB (1984) Filamentous actin bundles in the kidney. Anat Rec 210:1-9[Medline]
Bastl CP, Hayslett JP (1992) The cellular action of aldosterone in target epithelia. Kidney Int 42:250-264[Medline]
Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248-254[Medline]
Broch OJ, Ueland PM (1980) Regional and subcellular distribution of S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase in the adult rat brain. J Neurochem 35:484-488[Medline]
Buniatian G, Traub P, Albinus M, Beckers G, Buchmann A, Gebhardt R, Osswald H (1998) The immunoreactivity of glial fibrillary acidic protein in mesangial cells and podocytes of the glomeruli of rat kidney in vivo and in culture. Biol Cell 90:53-61[Medline]
Cantoni GL, Chiang PK (1980) The role of S-adenosylhomocysteine and S-adenosylhomocystein hydrolase in the control of biological methylation. In Cavallini D, Gaull GE, Zappia V, eds. Natural Sulfur Compounds: Novel Biochemical and Structural Aspects. New York, London, Plenum Press, 67-80
Cantoni GL, Richards HH, Chiang PK (1979) Inhibitors of S-adenosyl-homocysteine hydrolase and their role in the regulation of biological methylation. In Usdin E, Borchardt RT, Creveling CR, eds. Transmethylation. New York, Elsevier North Holland, 155-164
CoulterKaris DE, Hershfield MS (1989) Sequence of full length cDNA for human S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase. Ann Hum Genet 53:169-175[Medline]
De la Haba G, Agostini S, Bozzi A, Merta A, Unson C, Cantoni G (1986) S-adenosylhomocysteinase: mechanism of reversible and irreversible inactivation by ATP, cAMP, and 2'-deoxyadenosine. Biochemistry 25:8337-8342[Medline]
De la Haba G, Cantoni GL (1959) The enzymatic synthesis of S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine from adenosine and homocysteine. J Biol Chem 234:603-608
Eloranta TO (1977) Tissue distribution of S-adenosylmethionine and S-adenosylhomocysteine in the rat. Effect of age, sex and methionine administration on the metabolism of S-adenosylmethionine, S-adenosylhomocysteine and polyamines. Biochem J 166:521-529[Medline]
Finkelstein JD, Harris B (1973) Methionine metabolism in mammals. Synthesis of S-adenosylhomocysteine in rat tissues. Arch Biochem Biophys 159:160-165[Medline]
Finkelstein JD, Martin JJ (1984) Methionine metabolism in mammals. Distribution of homocysteine between competing pathways. Biol Chem 259:9508-9513
Guldberg HC, Marsden CA (1975) Catechol-O-methyl transferase: pharmacological aspects and physiological role. Pharmacol Rev 27:135-206[Medline]
Hershfield MS, Kredich NM (1978) S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase is an adenosine binding protein: a target for adenosine toxicity. Science 202:757-760[Medline]
Hirata F, Axelrod J (1980) Phospholipid methylation and biological signal transmission. Science 209:1082-1090[Medline]
Hugo C, Shankland SJ, BowenPope DF, Couser WG, Johnson RJ (1997) Extraglomerular origin of the mesangial cell after injury. A new role of the juxtaglomerular apparatus. J Clin Invest 100:786-794
Kloor D, Fuchs S, Petroktistis F, Delabar U, Mühlbauer B, Quast U, Osswald H (1998) Effects of ions on adenosine binding and enzyme activity of purified S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase from bovine kidney. Biochem Pharmacol 56:1493-1496[Medline]
Kloor D, Kurz J, Fuchs S, Faust B, Osswald H (1996) S-adenosylhomocysteine-hydrolase from bovine kidney: Enzymatic and binding properties. Kidney Blood Press Res 19:100-108[Medline]
Kriz W, Elger M, Mundel P, Lemley KV (1995) Structure-stabilizing forces in the glomerular tuft. J Am Soc Nephrol 5:1731-1739[Abstract]
Kroll K, Decking UK, Dreikorn K, Schrader J (1993) Rapid turnover of the AMP-adenosine metabolic cycle in the guinea pig heart. Circ Res 73:846-856[Abstract]
Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680-684[Medline]
Misra RP (1972) Isolation of glomeruli from mammalian kidneys by graded sieving. Am J Clin Pathol 58:135-139[Medline]
Mundel P, Kriz W (1995) Structure and function of podocytes: an update. Anat Embryol 192:385-397[Medline]
Osswald H, Schmitz H-J, Kemper R (1977) Tissue content of adenosine, inosine and hypoxanthine in the rat kidney after ischemia and postischemic recirculation. Pflugers Arch 371:45-49[Medline]
Patel BT, Tudball N (1986) Localization of S-adenosylhomocysteine-hydrolase and adenosine deaminase. Immunoreactivities in rat brain. Brain Res 370:250-264[Medline]
Schatz RA, Wilens TE, Sellinger OZ (1981) Decreased in vivo protein and phospholipid methylation after in vivo elevation of brain S-adenosylhomocysteine. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 98:1097-1107[Medline]
SeyerHansen K, Hansen J, Gunderson HJ (1980) Renal hypertrophy in experimental diabetes. A morphometric study. Diabetologia 18:501-505[Medline]
Shatkin AJ (1976) Capping of eucaryotic mRNAs. Cell 9:645-653[Medline]
Shatkin AJ, Furuichi Y, Sonnenberg N (1979) 5'-Terminal modification and translation of eukaryotic mRNAs. In Usdin E, Borchardt RT, Creveling CR, eds. Transmethylation. New York, Elsevier Noth Holland, 341-350
Stockand JD, Al-Baldawi NF, Al-Kahili OK, Eaton DC (1998) S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase activity modulates aldosterone-induced Na reabsorption. J Am Soc Nephrol 9:A0237
Vasmant D, Maurice M, Feldmann G (1984) Cytoskeleton ultrastructure of podocytes and glomerular endothelial cells in man and in rat. Anat Rec 210:17-24[Medline]
Wood GS, Warnke R (1981) Suppression of endogenous avidin-biotin activity in tissues and its relevance to biotin-avidin detection system. J Histochem Cytochem 29:1196-1204[Abstract]