Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, Vol. 51, 1-4, January 2003, Copyright © 2003, The Histochemical Society, Inc.


PERSPECTIVES

The Antigen–Antibody Reaction in Immunohistochemistry

Claudio Monteroa
a Seville, Spain

Correspondence to: Claudio Montero, Plaza Rafael Salgado 30-3°D, 41013 Sevilla, Spain. E-mail: montclau@supercable.es


  Summary
Top
Summary
Introduction
Mechanism of the Ag-Ab...
The Chemistry of Fixation
Antigen Retrieval
Heat Retrieval and the...
Literature Cited

The problems of major concern in immunohistochemical practice are discussed in the following order: (a) the mechanism of the Ag–Ab reaction in fixed tissue as opposed to the in vitro reaction; (b) the chemistry of fixation and its influence on the final result of the immunohistochemical reaction; (c) the various procedures used for antigen retrieval in formaldehyde-fixed tissue; and (d) the consideration of the possible mechanism underlying heat-induced antigen retrieval. Suggestions for further work to attempt a clarification of the mechanism involved in the Ag–Ab reaction in immunohistochemistry resorting to existing histochemical methods for the demonstration of protein side groups are presented, together with some examples already published.

(J Histochem Cytochem 51:1–4, 2003)

Key Words: antigen–antibody reaction, antigen retrieval, fixation, immunohistochemistry


  Introduction
Top
Summary
Introduction
Mechanism of the Ag-Ab...
The Chemistry of Fixation
Antigen Retrieval
Heat Retrieval and the...
Literature Cited


  Mechanism of the Ag–Ab Reaction in Formaldehyde-fixed Specimens
Top
Summary
Introduction
Mechanism of the Ag-Ab...
The Chemistry of Fixation
Antigen Retrieval
Heat Retrieval and the...
Literature Cited

THE ANTIGEN–ANTIBODY (Ag–Ab) reaction in immunohistochemistry (IHC) usually takes place generally between two protein macromolecules: the antigen, which may also be a glycoprotein, a lipoprotein, or just a protein, and the antibody, which is a glycoprotein. It must be emphasized, however, that in this case one of the macromolecules, the antigen, is located in a section of formaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Obviously the antigen protein is immobilized, and is more or less altered in its constitution and conformation, in the tissue section. However, according to the findings of Mason and O'Leary 1991 , at least, the secondary structure of the proteins has been "locked" in the process of fixation.

The antibody macromolecule that is diluted in the buffer covering the tissue section is free, during the incubation period, to wander in that buffer, obeying the laws of Brownian kinetics. Of course, the final result must be a consequence of the various factors intervening in these kinetics, e.g., pH, concentration, buffer constituents, salts added, dilution used, temperature. One of the most critical parameters is pH because the isoelectric point of the IgG used in this procedure is in a range of pH between 6.5 and 8.5 (Seppala et al. 1981 ) and "the optimal immunoreactivities of homogenous monoclonal antibodies could be compromised if the pH... of diluent buffer render the electrostatic charges of the epitope or paratope identical..." (Boenisch 1999 ). This point will be discussed again below.

Whereas the conformation of the immunoglobulin protein used in the Ag–Ab reaction in tissues is well preserved, usually in its native form, the conformation of the antigen protein, located in the tissue, cannot be considered intact. It has suffered the effect of the formaldehyde fixative and may have been modified in its constitution or its conformation. Even when, according to Mason and O'Leary 1991 , "the original secondary structure of proteins, in formaldehyde-fixed tissue, has been effectively locked in by the process of fixation," routine formaldehyde fixation and the rest of the procedure for paraffin embedding might have altered the protein macromolecules, consequently decreasing the intensity of the final reaction in the IHC procedure.

The kinetics of two macromolecules, such as the antigen and the antibody, as described by Davies et al. 1990 , both of which are free to move in the dilution liquid, has no similarity whatsoever to the kinetics of the two macromolecules acting in IHC. In this case, one of them is "anchored" in the tissue section, somewhat altered by the action of the fixative, and is bound to many other macromolecules in a way not clearly understood. The other is in its native state and is free to move in the dilution buffer. Of course, the basic physical and chemical laws are always the same: electrovalent attraction at a certain distance between the macromolecules and van der Waals forces, hydrogen bond formation and hydrophobic adhesion when the distance is smaller. However, the immobile state of the antigen plus the changes that have taken place in its protein side groups are factors that may have modified and conditioned the binding. Its possible association with other proteins or macromolecules in their surroundings may be an obstacle to its binding to the antibody (Bell et al. 1987 ). The situation just depicted cannot be compared with that of immune precipitation or Western blotting. In these cases, there is neither formaldehyde fixation nor the bizarre variety of many different macromolecules of many kinds, disposed in a section and interconnected with each other.

Summarizing, in IHC the Ag–Ab reaction is chiefly conditioned by the following facts: (a) the state of fixation of the antigen in the tissue section, with the existence of chemical bridges binding reactive side groups of proteins; (b) the relative freedom of the antibody macromolecules free to move in the dilution buffer covering the sections; and (c) the pH of the buffer used for dilution of the primary antibody. The range of best pH for IgG reaction used in the IHC procedure is between 6.5 and 8.5, as will be shown below.

The complex action of each one of the above factors may make it very difficult to interpret the results of the antigen retrieval (AR) procedure that is now so frequently used as a way to increase the final intensity of the color reaction or, even, to make a reaction that was negative without heat positive after its application.


  The Chemistry of Fixation
Top
Summary
Introduction
Mechanism of the Ag-Ab...
The Chemistry of Fixation
Antigen Retrieval
Heat Retrieval and the...
Literature Cited

Formaldehyde is the universal fixative in anatomic pathology. Consequently most of the research efforts have concentrated on this method of fixation. As stated by Pearse 1980 , it is essential to know as precisely as possible the effect of this fixative on the reactive groups of the various tissue components. Because proteins are the most important of these components, from the point of view of tissue constitution and structure, the action of formaldehyde on these components has attracted many studies.

Formaldehyde is usually used in a 10% solution of the commercial one, usually in neutral phosphate buffer. Formaldehyde exists in this solution in the form of methylene glycol, CH2(OH)2.

According to French and Edsall 1945 , the hydroxymethyl compound R-CH2(OH) could condense with a further H atom to form a methylene bridge R-CH2-R'. The formation of methylene bridges had previously been suggested by Meyer 1929 . Other possibilities have been suggested, but this one may serve to understand the formation of multiple bonds among proteins in the tissue sections by the establishment of methylene bridges between protein end-groups. In a kinetic study of formaldehyde binding to tissue, Helander 1994 has demonstrated that after 1 day a plateau of formaldehyde concentration in tissue was obtained after 24 hr and that two processes occur during this period: rapid diffusion of the formaldehyde and methylene glycol and binding of formaldehyde to the tissue. If the dimension of the tissue specimen is under the 2–3 mm prescribed, at least for one of the dimensions, 24 hr will consequently be enough for a good fixation.

The groups that may be involved in these bindings are amino, imino, amido, peptide, guanidyl, and carboxyl, SH, and aromatic rings. The investigations of Nitschmann and Hadorn 1944 and the group of Fraenkel–Conrat and colleagues (Fraenkel-Conrat et al. 1947 ; Fraenkel-Conrat and Olcott 1948a , Fraenkel-Conrat and Olcott 1948b ; Fraenkel-Conrat and Mecham 1949 ) have confirmed these assumptions. The chemistry of formaldehyde fixation and its effects on the IHC reaction have been analyzed by Puchtler and Meloan 1985 . These authors have underscored the resistance of the methylene crosslinks to the treatment with a high urea concentration, as demonstrated by Fraenkel-Conrat et al. 1947 . This point is mentioned here because a buffer containing 5% urea has been proposed as an AR solution in IHC (Shi et al. 1996 ).

In tissue samples heavily fixed with formaldehyde and stained with hematoxylin–eosin, it is not easy to retain the eosin staining of most histological structures presumed to be bound to the basic components in the tissue (e.g., amino groups of proteins) after ethanol dehydration. Sections treated by heat, as in the AR technique, stain more strongly with eosin and this staining is not easily lost by dehydration. These are only casual observations but are very suggestive of the increased number of protein side groups after heat retrieval procedures.

Of course, the Ag–Ab binding is stronger than the binding between a stain and tissue structures. In the Ag–Ab binding, as has been repeatedly said, there is not only the binding of complementary side groups of the two proteins but also a conformational fitting of two small areas, one each in the antigen and the antibody, the epitope and the paratope.

It is likely that a blockade of the pertinent side groups with existing histochemical methods may help in the confirmation of the above hypothesis. A detailed explanation of all these possibilities is not possible here but it can easily be foreseen.

An attempt to evaluate these binding forces has been attempted by Montero et al. 2000 , but much more can be done along this line of thought.


  Antigen Retrieval
Top
Summary
Introduction
Mechanism of the Ag-Ab...
The Chemistry of Fixation
Antigen Retrieval
Heat Retrieval and the...
Literature Cited

We cannot help but agree with Cattoretti et al. 1993 when they say that "the antigen is presumed to be masked in the section but not destroyed by fixation." However, the word "masked" is not, in our opinion, the right one. We can say that the reaction of side groups of proteins with formaldehyde with the formation of methylene bridges and other bindings among the macromolecules in the tissue, have altered the protein macromolecule in such a way that its reaction with the antibody is now impossible or, in the best case, difficult.

Shi and colleagues 1991 are the pioneers in the introduction and development of heat-induced AR, using microwave or oven heating of formaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. In subsequent studies it was found that there is a correlation between temperature of heating and heating time: the lower the temperature, the longer the time needed to obtain a given intensity. Different heating methods were used, but the temperature achieved appeared to be the critical variable. After the pioneer work of Shi et al. 1991 , a number of studies have appeared in the literature that support their conclusions (Werner et al. 1996 ; Frost et al. 2000 ; Miller et al. 2000 ; Taylor 2000 ) as well as a modification of the procedure (Bankfalvi et al. 1994 ; Biddolph and Jones 1999 ).

Studying the influence of pH on the antigen-retrieval IHC (Shi et al. 1997 ), these authors found three different patterns of staining: (a) the stable type; (b) the V-form type; and (c) the ascending type. These can be interpreted as follows: (a) those antigens that result in an acceptable reaction through the whole scale of pHs; (b) those antigens with best results at extremes of pH, both alkaline and acid; and (c) antigens with best results on the alkaline side of the pH. They finally recommended using the AR solution of high pH. In their 1997 report, Shi et al. stated that "three types of antigens were demonstrated based on the pH value of the AR solution..."

Considering that there is a time interval between treatment with the AR solution at a predetermined pH and the incubation with the primary antibody, used at a pH not stated but presumed to be the pH usually used in routine histochemical procedures, the results of IHC appear to depend chiefly on the modifications introduced, not only of heat but also of the pH, in the protein macromolecules of the tissue. Their findings have been summarized recently (Shi et al. 2000 ).

The pH-dependent modifications of the macromolecules must be different in the various kinds of proteins, something that appears obvious when we consider that those proteins do have different degrees of polarization (i.e., either acidic or basic). This is a point that seems to have received little attention although it is outstanding in the reaction with the antibody.

In dealing with these problems it is always assumed that we are using monoclonal antibodies. Obviously, the reaction of polyclonal antibodies, with so many subsets of antibodies against different specific epitopes in the same solution, is more difficult to block. The mechanism of blockade cannot affect different epitopes in a similar way. On the other hand, monoclonal antibodies with only one possibility of reaction with an epitope are prone to give clear-cut results.

The comment of Boenisch 2001 that "any modification of the diluent buffer can affect the performance of both, the tissue antigen and the diluted antibody" but "that any improvement in quality of staining is consequence of antigen retrieval through a structural modification of the antigen" must be stressed here. The first proposition is true because any modification of the pH or the cations in the incubation medium will affect the Ag–Ab reaction: First, the change in pH because it implies a change in the polarization of both the protein components of the tissue and the antibody proteins (see Bungenberg de Jong 1949 ), and second, because the cations may affect the performance of monoclonal antibodies. Sodium chloride has been used in immunoabsorption and in chromatography and has been shown to suppress immunoreactivity at alkaline pH (Boenisch 1999 ).


  Heat Retrieval and the Side Groups of Proteins
Top
Summary
Introduction
Mechanism of the Ag-Ab...
The Chemistry of Fixation
Antigen Retrieval
Heat Retrieval and the...
Literature Cited

The statement by Bell et al. 1987 on the formaldehyde sensitivity of GFAP epitope, that "the effect of proteases, improving binding of the antibody to its epitope in fixed tissues, is consistent with the hypothesis that aldehyde fixation reduces the accessibility of antibodies to their epitopes, rather than altering epitope structure," backs up the general view that alteration of the chemical constitution of the epitope by fixation is not an insurmountable handicap. The demonstration by these authors that the blockade or induced steric change of the structure of the epitope could be due to the crosslinking to GFAP of another protein adds a possibility to bear in mind when a negative result is obtained with a monoclonal antibody.

These and other explanations for negative results occasionally obtained when the IHC procedure is used for the demonstration of tissue proteins further demonstrate the complex problem of elucidating the mechanism of the Ag–Ab reaction in formaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. Moreover, they tell us that the availability of chemical groups after AR that are responsible for the increased reactivity with the antibody cannot be easily explained in simple and direct terms. The only alternative that appears possible is a detailed study of each one of the many possibilities that may exist in the extensive variety of protein macromolecules existing in organic tissues.

An unpretentious possibility is given, in a report by Montero et al. 1991 , which could be modified and extended to alternative antigens. Existing histochemical procedures for the demonstration of protein side or end groups (carboxyl and amino groups; tyrosine, tryptophan or histidine, as well as cystine or cysteine) might be applied to tissue sections before and after the AR technique, together with blockade of the same groups (Pearse 1968 ).

The use of different monoclonal antibodies for the same macromolecule can also be recommended because not all the epitopes in the same molecules have the same amino acid constitution. At the same time, the use of the corresponding positive and negative controls and of the blocking procedures suitable in each case is advised.

The judicious use of the above-mentioned histochemical procedures for the demonstration of protein side groups, together with the antigen retrieval technique, might be helpful in the interpretation of the results of these procedures.

Received for publication October 3, 2001; accepted September 11, 2002.
  Literature Cited
Top
Summary
Introduction
Mechanism of the Ag-Ab...
The Chemistry of Fixation
Antigen Retrieval
Heat Retrieval and the...
Literature Cited

Bankfalvi A, Navabi H, Bier B, Böcker W, Asan B, Schmid KR (1994) Wet autoclave pretreatment for antigen retrieval in diagnostic immunohistochemistry. J Pathol 174:223-228[Medline]

Bell PB, Jr, Rundquist I, Svensson I, Collins VP (1987) Formaldehyde sensitivity of a GFAP epitope, removed by extraction of the cytoskeleton with high salt. J Histochem Cytochem 35:1375-1380[Abstract]

Biddolph SC, Jones M (1999) Low-temperature, heat-mediated antigen retrieval (LTHMAR) on archival lymphoid sections. Appl Immunohistochem 7:289-293

Boenisch T (1999) Diluent buffer ions and pH: their influence on the performance of monoclonal antibodies in immunohistochemistry. Appl Immunohistochem 7:300-306

Boenisch T (2001) Formalin-fixed and heat-retrieved tissue antigens: a comparison of their immunoreactivity in experimental antibody diluents. Appl Immunohistochem 9:176-179

Bungenberg de Jong HG (1949) Reversal of charge phenomena, equivalent weight and specific properties of the ionised groups. In Kruyt HR, ed. Colloid Science. Vol II. Elsevier, New York, 259-334

Cattoretti G, Pileri S, Parravicini C, Becker MHG, Pogi C, Bifulco G et al. (1993) Antigen unmasking on formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissues sections. J Pathol 171:83-98[Medline]

Davies DR, Padlan EA, Sheriff S (1990) Antibody-antigen complexes. Annu Rev Biochem 59:439-473[Medline]

Fraenkel–Conrat H, Brandon BA, Olcott HS (1947) The reaction of formaldehyde with proteins. IV. Participation of indole groups. Gramicidine. J Biol Chem 168:99-118

Fraenkel–Conrat H, Mecham DK (1949) The reaction of formaldehyde with proteins. VII. Demonstration of intermolecular cross-linking by means of osmotic pressure measurements. J Biol Chem 177:477-486[Free Full Text]

Fraenkel–Conrat H, Olcott HS (1948a) The reaction of formaldehyde with proteins. V. Cross-linking between amino and primary amide or guanidyl groups. J Am Chem Soc 70:2673-2684

Fraenkel–Conrat H, Olcott HS (1948b) The reaction of formaldehyde with proteins. VI. Cross-linking of amino groups with phenol, imidazole and indole groups. J Biol Chem 174:827-843[Free Full Text]

French D, Edsall JT (1945) Reactions of formaldehyde with amino acids and proteins. Adv Prot Chem II: 277–335

Frost AR, Sparks D, Grizzle WE (2000) Methods of antigen recovery vary in their usefulness in unmasking specific antigens in immunohistochemistry. Appl Immunohistochem 8:236-243

Helander KG (1994) Kinetic studies of formaldehyde binding in tissue. Biotech Histochem 64:177-179

Mason JT, O'Leary TJ (1991) Effects of formaldehyde fixation on protein secondary structure: a calorimetric and infrared spectroscopic investigation. J Histochem Cytochem 39:225-239[Abstract]

Meyer KH (1929) Die Chemie der Micelle und ihrer Anwendung auf biochemische und biologische Probleme. Biochem Z 208:1-31

Miller RT, Swanson PE, Wick MR (2000) Fixation and epitope retrieval in diagnostic immunohistochemistry: a concise review with practical considerations. Appl Immunohistochem 8:228-235

Montero C, Chi–Ahumada E, Chaves–Porras S, Gutierrez M (2000) Application of the critical molar concentration concept to heat-mediated antigen retrieval in immunohistochemistry. Histochemistry J 32:111-114

Montero C, Segura DI, Gutierrez M (1991) Blockade of the antigen-antibody reaction using benzil condensation with the guanidyl residue of arginine. Histochemistry J 23:125-131

Nitschmann von HS, Hadorn H (1944) Die Umsetzung des Caseins mit Formaldehyd. V. Über das Verhalten der {varepsilon}-Aminogruppen des Lysins und der Peptidogruppen. Helv Chim Acta 27:299-312

Pearse AGE (1968) Histochemistry. Theoretical and Applied. Vol 1. 3rd ed London, J & A Churchill

Pearse AGE (1980) Histochemistry. Theoretical and Applied. Vol 1. 4th ed. Preparative and Optical Technology. London, Churchill Livingstone, pp. 97–158

Puchtler H, Meloan SN (1985) On the chemistry of formaldehyde fixation and its effects on immunohistochemical reactions. Histochemistry 82:201-204[Medline]

Seppala I, Sarvas H, Peterfy P, Makela O (1981) The four subclasses of IgG can be isolated from mouse serum by using protein A-Sepharose. Scand J Immunol 14:335-342[Medline]

Shi S-R, Cote RJ, Taylor CR (1997) Antigen retrieval immunohistochemistry: past, present, and future. J Histochem Cytochem 45:327-343[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shi S-R, Cote RJ, Young I, Imam SA, Taylor CR (1996) Use of pH 9.5 Tris HCl buffer containing 5% urea for antigen retrieval immunohistochemistry. Biotech Histochem 71:190-196[Medline]

Shi S-R, Gu J, Taylor CR (2000) Antigen Retrieval Techniques: Immunohistochemical and Molecular Morphology. Natick, MA, Eaton Publishing

Shi S-R, Key ME, Kalra KL (1991) Antigen retrieval in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues: an enhancement method for immunohistochemical staining based on microwave oven heating of tissue sections. J Histochem Cytochem 39:741-748[Abstract]

Taylor CR (2000) Antigen retrieval: call for a return to first principles. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 8:173-174[Medline]

Werner M, von Wasielewski R, Komminoth P (1996) Antigen retrieval, signal amplification and intensification in immunohistochemistry. Histochem Cell Biol 105:253-260[Medline]