Copyright ©The Histochemical Society, Inc.

A Rapid Method for Assessing the Distribution of Gold Labeling on Thin Sections

John Milton Lucocq, Anja Habermann, Stephen Watt, Jonathan M. Backer, Terry M. Mayhew and Gareth Griffiths

School of Life Sciences, MSI/WTB Complex, University of Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom (JML,SW); EMBL, Heidelberg, Germany (AH,GG); Department of Molecular Pharmacology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York (JB); and Centre for Integrated Systems Biology and Medicine, School of Biomedical Sciences, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom (TMM)

Correspondence to: Dr. John Lucocq, School of Life Sciences, WTB/MSI Complex, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, Scotland, UK. E-mail: j.m.lucocq{at}dundee.ac.uk


    Summary
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Literature Cited
 
Particulate gold labeling on ultrathin sections is in widespread use for antigen localization at the EM level. To extend the usefulness of gold labeling technology, we are evaluating different methods for sampling and estimating quantities of gold labeling. Here we present a simple, rapid, and unbiased method for assessing the relative pool sizes of immunogold labeling distributed over different cell compartments. The method uses a sampling approach developed for stereology in which a regular array of microscopic fields or linear scans is positioned randomly on labeled sections. From these readouts, gold particles are counted and assigned to identifiable cell structures to construct a gold labeling frequency distribution of those labeled compartments. Here we use ultrathin cryosections labeled for a range of different proteins and for a signaling lipid. We show by scanning labeled sections at the electron microscope that counting 100–200 particles on each of two grids is sufficient to obtain a reproducible and rapid assessment of the pattern of labeling proportions over 10–16 compartments. If more precise estimates of labeling proportions over individual compartments are required (e.g., to achieve coefficients of error of 10–20%), then 100–200 particles need to be counted over each compartment of interest.

(J Histochem Cytochem 52:991–1000, 2004)

Key Words: gold labeling • immunoelectron microscopy • stereology • systematic random • correlation


    Introduction
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Literature Cited
 
OVER THE PAST 20 YEARS, colloidal gold particles have become the reagents of choice for antigen localization in immunoelectron microscopy. Owing to their high electron density and punctate nature, they are relatively easy to detect and count, and these features make them well suited to the quantitative assessment of local antigen concentration or distribution in different cell compartments (Griffiths 1993Go; Hayat 1995Go). Despite these advantages many studies have relied on qualitative impressions of immunolabeling that, in some cases, are only later confirmed by quantitative data. And yet, the qualitative approach may not be sensitive enough to detect weak labeling or small differences in labeling signal (or concentration) between different structures, and a quantitative approach is then required.

Existing methods for quantifying gold particles on ultrathin sections prepared for transmission EM have focused on estimating a labeling density over 2D profiles (Lucocq et al. 1986Go,1989Go,2001Go; Griffiths 1993Go; Lucocq 1992Go,1994Go; Mayhew et al. 2003Go). This is variably expressed as the number of gold particles per length of membrane trace, per length of cytoskeletal filament/tubule, or per sectional area of organelle profile. In addition, with knowledge of section thickness and cell or organelle volume, these 2D readouts can be converted into 3D densities of gold particles per surface or volume of a subcellular compartment or structure (Lucocq 1992Go,1994Go; Griffiths and Hoppeler 1986Go; Griffiths 1993Go). The labeling densities are calculated using counts of gold particles combined with estimates of organelle/membrane 2D profile or 3D size. Then, with the caveat that the efficiency of labeling (gold particles per antigen) can vary among compartments (see Griffiths 1993Go for discussion), the labeling concentration may give an impression of the local antigen concentration.

Although labeling densities report on antigen density, it may also be of interest to know the pool sizes of gold labeling (and therefore antigen) in different cell compartments. This is especially important when labeling has a complex distribution through multiple compartments or when the distribution of the antigen varies according to changes in cell physiology. To obtain this readout, the size estimations of intracellular compartments in 2D or 3D are not needed, and unbiased representative samples of gold particle numbers displayed on the cryosection can be used directly. Importantly, if the ultrathin sections are positioned randomly within the samples, the 2D counts will be representative of the counts over the 3D space as well, and the pattern of labeling (labeling distribution) then provides an estimate of which compartments hold major pools of antigen and which ones do not (Lucocq 1994Go,2003Go; Griffiths 1993Go).

Recently we have embarked on a strategy for identifying (and developing) efficient and sensitive ways to describe antigen labeling distributions and concentrations in cell structures/compartments and to test for preferential labeling (Griffiths et al. 2001Go; Mayhew et al. 2002Go,2003Go; see Ochs et al. 2002Go, Fujii et al. 2003Go, and Mironov et al. 2003Go for applications). Importantly, this effort has been assisted by adaptation of existing quantitative stereological methods in which random sampling rules, combined with design-based stereological estimators, are applied to avoid biased selection of specimens and data and to provide precise and efficient estimates of relevant structural quantities (Cruz-Orive and Weibel 1981Go,1990Go; Mayhew 1992Go; Lucocq 1994Go; Howard and Reed 1998Go). We consider the formalization of these methods to be important because, although the role of random sampling both for quantitating gold labeling and in the wider scheme of the sampling hierarchy may be widely recognized, there has been little work on examining which are the most efficient procedures for obtaining quantitative results.

Here we focus on a rapid and simple method for evaluating antigen labeling distributions that can be employed at both the early and the late stages of research studies. The method takes advantage of the fundamental "cornerstone" of all design-based stereology, i.e., unbiased selection of sampling items by random sampling (Gundersen and Jensen 1987Go; Mayhew 1991Go; Gundersen et al. 1999Go). In this method, a systematic random array of micrographs or scans is used to count gold particles and assign them to various compartments. The systematic placement makes data collection rapid and therefore improves efficiency.

The procedure yields an unbiased quantitative estimate of the distribution pattern of labeling within a cell or tissue and is illustrated using antigens/moieties that are likely to have complex distributions. These include (a) ezrin, the actin-binding protein that probably forms significant pools in the cytosol and associates with actin at cell membranes and intracellular membrane structures (Bretscher et al. 2000Go,2002Go; Defacque et al. 2000Go,2002Go), (b) LAMP1, the lysosomal membrane glycoprotein that is distributed on membranes of the endolysosome system (Rouille et al. 2000Go), (c) the lipid, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, which we have recently demonstrated in plasma membrane and a variety of intracellular membranes using novel methodology (Watt et al. 2002Go) and, finally, (d) an array of phosphoinositol and phosphoinositide (lipid) kinases whose distribution has thus far not been studied in depth by immunoEM (Vanhaesebroeck et al. 2001Go). The detailed distribution and related biology of these kinases will be published and discussed elsewhere. Here, gold labeling obtained with antibodies against these proteins is used simply to illustrate the generality of the method.

We show that to obtain a reproducible pattern of labeling over a range of (10–16) intracellular compartments, a count of 100–200 gold particles can suffice. If more accurate and reproducible estimates of the proportion of gold particles on a single compartment are required, then 100–200 particles should be counted on that single compartment, a result consistent with the sample size requirements for other stereological estimators of size/number (Gundersen and Jensen 1987Go; Mayhew 1990Go; Lucocq 1993Go).


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Literature Cited
 
Rationale of the Counting Method
Typically, processing for immunoelectron microscopy starts with animals, plants, organs, or cell cultures each of which may have been treated under different experimental conditions. After fixation, a number of blocks or pellets are made from which a limited number of ultrathin sections are cut and mounted on EM support grids and labeled with colloidal gold reagents. Finally, very small areas of these ultrathin sections are examined or photographed in the transmission electron microscope (TEM) for gold counting. Significantly, the small areas used for counting represent an extremely small fraction of all the possible areas that could be examined on that section, and each of the ultrathin sections used for the analysis also comprises only one of many that could be selected. Furthermore, the blocks or animals are each likely to represent a selection or sample of a larger "population" of items. Therefore, it would be impractical to examine the entire surface of each possible section through all of the blocks from each animal or culture. Sampling is therefore a necessity.

To ensure that a sample is fair (unbiased), the sampling method must ensure that every item has exactly the same chance of being chosen. The key to achieving this is random selection of culture dishes, tissue blocks, cell pellets, sections, and fields. Although random sampling is adequate at most of these levels (e.g., animals, cell pellets, or blocks) it is important to consider some important refinements to the approach. First, at the level of sectioning, it may also be important to cut sections not only at a random position but also at a random orientation. This is particularly crucial because the appearance of membrane traces on ultrathin sections and the labeling of membrane antigens are sensitive to orientation of the sections (see Discussion). Second, at the level of examining or photographing the labeled ultrathin section, it may be more appropriate to use a modification to random sampling termed systematic random sampling. This tends to be more efficient than simple random sampling. In systematic random sampling, the position of the first item is selected at random but a pre-set (systematic) pattern then determines the positions of all other items in the sample (for some practical examples see Gundersen and Jensen 1987Go; Mayhew 1990Go,1991Go). This type of sampling is well suited to counting using TEM because regular arrays of micrographs or regularly spaced scans of the ultrathin section are convenient and easy to arrange (see below). It is systematic random sampling that is used in this report to sample gold particles in an unbiased and efficient manner.

When specimen support grids are used, the spaces (windows) between grid bars can be used to fix the systematic random pattern. The encounters between grid bars and the specimen section are randomized during the process of mounting the section on the grid and by the choice of grid corner. From such a random starting point there are alternative ways of arranging a systematic array in which to do the counting. One way is to randomly select a grid square that contains a labeled section and, starting at the corner of this square (random position), micrographs are taken at intervals across the grid square to form a regular array (Weibel 1979Go). The spacing is determined by applying equal rotations of the manual translation controls of the microscope or, when motorized controls are available, by programming systematically spaced locations. Another approach used in this report is implemented as follows. Starting at a grid square corner, the whole of the sectioned pellet/block within that grid square is scanned continuously in equally spaced parallel sweeps across the specimen (Figure 1). Random selection ensures that scanning is done irrespective of the amount of cell or the intensity of gold labeling, for example. This strategy allows counting to be performed directly at the TEM. Again, the spacing between sweeps is determined by the rotations of the manual translation controls or by programming the motorized stage control if present.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1

Rapid scanning method for counting gold particles over intracellular compartments. (A) Scanning is done at the lowest magnification at which the compartments of interest and also gold particles can be clearly recognized. The scan is started at the corner of a randomly selected EM grid square that contains labeled cells (random position). Scanning is continued in horizontal sweeps equally spaced by equal turns of the translation controls or by using a motorized stage. Each gold particle contained in the field is then assigned to a compartment/structure category. When scanning is complete (e.g., roughly 100–200 gold particles over each grid; see Results) the gold particles over each compartment/structure are counted and the percentage of particles over each compartment is then calculated. To ensure unbiasedness, it is important to spread systematically spaced scans over the whole of the specimen profile that is situated in the grid square. (B) A detailed representation of the counting procedure. When cell profiles are encountered, gold particles that enter the field of view are assigned to cell compartments or structures of interest and counted (without deviating from the track of the scan).

 
Some cautionary notes on the (systematic) random sampling process are worth making. First, provided a selected field or scan shows the cell type or structure of interest, it must be analyzed regardless of its content. For example, the field must not be moved to ensure that the whole cell profile becomes contained within the field. Nor should a given field be restricted to cell profiles containing, e.g., a nuclear profile or Golgi complex. These would constitute component-biased samples (Mayhew 1979Go). A second point to note is that, when micrographs of the sampled fields are recorded, it is more efficient to select the minimum magnification at which gold particles and cell compartments can be clearly identified (Lucocq 1994Go). By definition, going higher than this magnification will not improve identification and, in practice, it will actually be less efficient because higher magnifications provide smaller sample areas and, in effect, merely amplify field-to-field variation (Cruz-Orive and Weibel 1981Go). Once the appropriate magnification has been selected, gold particles are counted in each field and assigned to different preselected compartment categories. Compartment categories are often determined partly by experience and expectation, but they may also be chosen arbitrarily by the investigator to suit the needs of a particular study (Mayhew et al. 2002Go, 2003Go). The gold counts can now be used to construct a bar chart of the observed frequency of labeling of different compartments (Figure 1). The approach we suggest is not only the simplest conceivable method to quantify immunogold labeling but it is also the most rapid.

Applications
Cells and Labeling
J774A1 murine macrophages (purchased from ATCC; Rockville, MD) were grown on 10-cm dishes by cultivating in DMEM + 10% fetal calf serum + glutamine + penicillin/streptomycin in a 37C incubator with a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Cells were pre-labeled with three different markers to identify early endocytic organelles (5 min, 5-nm protein A–gold), late endosomes, and lysosomes (16-nm gold for 1 hr followed by an overnight chase) and phagosomes [labeled with latex beads for 1 hr followed by a 1-hr chase (Desjardins et al. 1994Go; Jahraus et al. 1998Go)].

The cells prepared as thin cryosections according to Tokuyasu (Tokuyasu 1973Go,1978Go; Griffiths 1993Go) were labeled with antibodies directed against a panel of lipid kinases (see below), LAMP1, and ezrin, followed by protein A–gold. For present purposes, five antibodies against lipid kinases are reported and defined as follows: anti-p-110-{alpha} PI3kinase (Kin 2), an anti-PI4kinase-{alpha}/AE2448 (Kin 6), an anti-hVPS34 PI3kinase (Kin 10) (Murray et al. 2002Go), and AE245A, an antibody to PI4kinase-ß (Kin 5) (Backer 2000Go). Labeling for the lipid phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate was performed as described in Watt et al. (2002)Go.

Sampling
To ensure random sampling of sections and cells, all fragments from a given pellet were allowed to settle haphazardly (Stringer et al. 1982Go) and fixed to cryoholders at random orientations. One or two cubes chosen at random (lottery method) were cut to provide two or three grids for each antibody dilution. Each grid carried several sections. Sections were viewed by TEM using a Zeiss EM 10 at 80 kV or a JEOL 1200EX at a primary magnification of 20,000, and a grid corner of a randomly selected grid square containing well-contrasted sections was selected. Systematic random sampling of TEM fields was achieved by scanning the pellet profile in parallel scans separated by equal spacing conferred by equal turns of the Y-axis translation control. The procedure is illustrated in Figure 1.

Roughly 100–200 gold particles were counted per grid square and each particle was assigned to a particular cell compartment (to estimate the number of scans needed for gold counts in this range, a single pilot scan across the pellet was made in the first instance). The field was only moved off-track (or to a higher magnification) to aid identification of the compartment structure but was moved back onto the scan track (and the starting magnification) once this had been done. A range of compartments was identified, including plasma membrane, early endosomes, late endosomes, multivesicular endosomes, early endosome-like structures without 5-nm gold and late endosome-like structures without 16-nm gold, phagosomes, endoplasmic reticulum, nuclear envelope (both inner and outer membranes), clearly recognizable Golgi stacks and vesicles, outer mitochondrial membrane and matrix (including the inner mitochondrial membrane), nuclear matrix, cytoplasm, and unidentified membranes (see figure legends for details).

Statistical Analyses
Observed gold counts were used to construct numerical and percentage frequency distributions. These distributions (single or pooled) were used to test for correlations between the distributions of gold counts on individual grids of the same experiment or on grids of different experiments (Siegel 1956Go). To compare labeling distributions we used (a) the Pearson correlation coefficient (r), which describes the degree to which proportions of gold label agree from one count to the next, (b) the rank-based Spearman correlation coefficient (rs), which assesses the degree to which the order or rank of compartments, with respect to the labeling proportion they hold, is reproduced between groups (this non-parametric statistic does not rely on restrictions and assumptions needed for interpreting the Pearson r), and (c) the Kendall rank coefficient of concordance, which compares the agreement between ranks between more than two distribution patterns. Each of these coefficients gives a value with a maximum value of +1 and is relatively insensitive to variation in the total number of gold particles. The procedures for analyzing two labeling distributions to obtain Pearson and Spearman coefficients are illustrated in Tables 1 and 2. Notes on the application of Kendall rank coefficient of concordance are given in Siegel (1956)Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1

Example of calculation of Pearson correlation coefficienta

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2

Example of calculation of Spearman correlation coefficienta

 

    Results
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Literature Cited
 
The main goal of this work was to test the idea that a count of 100–200 gold particles is sufficient to detect reproducible patterns in the distribution of gold particle labeling over a range of different cell structures present in immunolabeled sections. We used thawed ultrathin cryosections prepared according to Tokuyasu and selected concentrations of antibody that produced heterogeneous labeling patterns over cell structures and compartments. Higher concentrations produced more intense and more homogeneous labeling, probably due to nonspecific interactions of the labeling system with the sections. Patterns of labeling were said to be reproducible when the patterns displayed a parametric or non-parametric correlation coefficient in excess of 0.8.

We then decided which compartments to include in the analysis. LAMP1 is thought to reside predominantly in membranes of the endolysosomal system. Ezrin is a cytoplasmic protein that, when activated, binds to membranes (from the literature mostly the plasma membrane), where it is involved in actin binding and/or assembly (Bretscher et al. 2000Go,2002Go). This protein is involved in de novo actin assembly on phagosomes and, probably, also on endosomes (Defacque et al. 2000Go,2002Go; unpublished data). The phosphoinositide lipid phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PI4,5P2) has been localized to a range of intracellular membranes, plasma membrane, and nucleus using the PH domain of PLCdelta1 tagged with GST as described elsewhere (Watt et al. 2002Go). The phosphoinositide kinases have not been localized at the EM level, but immunofluorescence data suggest that they are predominantly cytoplasmic but can be targeted or recruited to act in intracellular membranes (Vanhaesebroeck et al. 2001Go).

On the basis of these data, we examined between 10 and 16 compartments for each antigen and lipid, including compartments known to contain the antigen as well as some that were expected to lack these proteins. In all cases, we included elements of endocytic and secretory pathways, mitochondria, nucleus, and cytoplasm and in some cases phagosomes (LAMP1, ezrin, and lipid kinases; see figure legends).

Reproducible Patterns of Labeling with 100–200 Gold Particles
To estimate the distribution of gold particles over compartments, we selected portions of the whole cell pellet profile and, from a random start point, scanned systematically spaced strips across the sample, assigning gold particles to appropriate compartments (see Materials and Methods and Figure 1 for details).

Examples of distributions of ezrin and PI4,5P2 are illustrated in Figures 2 and 3 and statistical results are presented in Table 3. Ezrin labeling was first evaluated by counting 100 particles on each of four grids and 200 particles over three grids. Qualitatively, there appears to be a similar pattern between the distributions at 100 particles but results appear to be more reproducible when 200 particles are counted. This is borne out by the correlation coefficients (see Table 3). There is also a greater concordance between individual grids when 200 particles are counted.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2

Patterns of label for the actin-binding protein ezrin. Proportions of labeling over cell compartments labeled using antibodies against ezrin at the stated dilutions were assessed as described in Materials and Methods. In each experiment, 100 gold particles per grid (total four grids) or 200 particles per grid (total three grids) were counted. Total counts are presented and abbreviations are as follows. PM, plasma membrane; EE, early endosome; LE, late endosome; LY, lysosome; PH, phagosome; GV, Golgi vesicle; GS, Golgi stack; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; NE, nuclear envelope; Nuc, nucleoplasm; Mit Me, mitochondrial membrane; Mit Ma, mitochondrial matrix; Cyt, cytosol; ??, unidentified membrane structures; Lat Bd, latex beads.

 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3

Patterns of label for the lipid PI4,5P2. PLCdelta1 labeling was from three grids of the same experiment (200 gold particles per grid counted according to the scanning procedure described in Materials and Methods). The overall patterns are similar, although certain compartments have higher variability than others (e.g., plasma membrane). Despite the variability in proportion of label, the overall rank order of labeling proportions (lower part of figure; data from six grids, three in each of two experiments) is reasonably well preserved from grid to grid. PM, plasma membrane; Cyt, cytosol; GS, Golgi stack; GV, Golgi vesicle; EE, early endosome; MVB, multivesicular body; NE, nuclear envelope; Nuc, nucleoplasm; Mit Me, mitochondrial membrane; Mit Ma, mitochondrial matrix; ??, unidentified structures.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3

Comparison of labeling distributions using correlation and concordance coefficientsa

 
Approximately 200 particles were used to evaluate the distribution of PLCdelta1 labeling for PI4,5P2, which qualitatively appears quite variable (Figure 3). Much of the variability appeared to be due to variable amounts of extraction of lipid (and therefore labeling), especially at the plasma membrane (see Watt et al. 2002Go). However, there was a good correlation between individual grids within each of two experiments and between pairs of grids of independent experiments. There was also good concordance (Kendall coefficient W near to 1) between the ranking orders in each of the two experiments or when all six grids from the two experiments were considered together. Quantitation confirmed that the variation between grids occurred at the plasma membrane. When compartments were ranked in order of labeling signal, this ranking was remarkably consistent over all grids (see Figure 3).

These observations were largely confirmed using 100 particle counts for various lipid kinases. The emerging trend was a very good correlation between distributions obtained from different blocks when 100 particles on each of two grids were counted. Increasing the total number of particles counted from 100 to 200 and spreading observations over two grids greatly increases the reproducibility of the distributions obtained. We also found interesting effects of dilution on the results. When the anti-p110{alpha} type I PI3kinase catalytic subunit (Kin 2) was labeled with dilutions of 1:100, 1:250, and 1:500, the distributions of labeling at 1:250 and 1:500 dilutions were virtually identical (r = 1) but the 1:100 dilution was slightly less similar to either of these (r = 0.983). On dilution of the antibody, certain compartments increased and others decreased their share of labeling. The latter included mitochondria, which were not expected to contain this protein.

There was considerable variation in the LAMP1 labeling pattern when 100 particles per grid were sampled (Table 3). Qualitative observations suggested that the variation was due to the presence of heavily labeled but relatively infrequently sectioned structures such as lysosomes and phagosomes. Interestingly, decreasing the number of categories from 16 to 11 by fusing categories did not increase the correlation between grids. However, pooling the results of the two grids from the same experiment produced a marked improvement in the correlation between experiments. Therefore, it is likely that the variation in the presence of the heavily labeled organelle profiles in the section was related to their relative rarity, and that taking more sections increases the chances that rare structures are sectioned and included in the sample. We conclude that, if most of the labeling is inhomogeneously distributed over rare structures, it may be difficult to obtain reliable estimates of the labeling distribution using a single count of only 100 particles from one grid. Increasing the number of grids examined increases the reproducibility of the distribution patterns from one experiment to the next.

Obtaining Precise Estimates of Proportions over Individual Compartments
We have shown above that the sampling of 100–200 particles is sufficient in most cases to obtain a reproducible pattern of the distribution of label over a range of cellular compartments. However, it may be of interest to estimate more precisely the proportion of label over a particular compartment or structure. One way of assessing the precision is to estimate the coefficient of error, which can be predicted from the standard deviation of the data and the number of grids in the sample. We plotted the log of the total number of particles counted against log of the coefficient of error to provide an impression of the relationship between these quantities (see Figure 4). There was a reasonably consistent relationship that could then be used to assess the coefficient of error obtained at various sizes of sample (i.e., numbers of gold particles counted per compartment). As expected, the more gold particles that were counted over a compartment, the smaller was the coefficient of error. The relationships shown in Figure 4 predict that, at a coefficient of error of 10%, a count of around 130 particles would be a sufficient investment of effort, while for a 5% coefficient of error ~400 particles would be needed. Therefore, to obtain a more precise estimate of the proportion of labeling over a particular compartment, additional effort is necessary.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4

Coefficient of error of estimates is related to total gold particles counted. Relationship between the coefficient of error of the labeling proportion in a compartment compared with the total number of gold particles counted over all grids in the experiment. Ezrin data are from three experiments, one with 200 particles counted on each of three grids and two with 100 particles counted on each four grids (7/45 compartments were excluded from the analysis because they had total counts of zero or 1). The PLCdelta1 data were obtained from two independent experiments. In each experiment, 200 gold particles were counted on each of three grids. Coefficients of error were calculated for each experiment using the results for each grid, i.e., for ezrin n=3 and 4, for PLCdelta1 n=3.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Literature Cited
 
In this study we evaluated a simple and efficient method for estimating the patterns of immunogold labeling over subcellular compartments. The method depends on collecting data from a systematic random set of scans from which the location and amount of gold labeling are determined. The sampling strategy allows an unbiased and efficient assessment of the distribution of labeling proportions over cell structures. We show that reproducible patterns of labeling can be obtained when counts of ~200 gold particles, spread over one or two grids, are made. This is a modest investment of effort and is therefore well adapted to pilot studies as well as more extensive investigations of distributions. Our results also indicate that spreading sampling fields and gold counts widely over the available material, by sampling at least 100–200 gold particles per grid on each of two grids (from one or more independent experiments), provides reproducible results. This reflects the relative importance of higher sampling levels in multilevel sampling designs for stereology (Shay 1975Go; Gundersen and Østerby 1981Go; Gupta et al. 1983Go), in which it is better to spread counts over more blocks and more grids rather than over more fields within a single grid. This effect is illustrated particularly well in the case of the inhomogeneously distributed and clustered antigen LAMP1. Here, counts of 100 gold particles from two EM grids produced a more reproducible result than a count of 200 made on a single EM grid. Again, it is important to emphasize that higher levels in the sampling scheme (experiments/animals/tissue slices/blocks) must also incorporate unbiased sampling design to ensure unbiasedness of the gold labeling estimate.

It is important to distinguish between reproducibility of the pattern of labeling proportions over multiple compartments (assessed here by correlation and concordance coefficients) with accurate estimates of a labeling proportion for a single compartment. Our results show that if more accurate estimates of the proportion of labeling on an individual compartment are required, then the counts need to be focused on the compartment of interest. In the present study, 100–200 gold particles over an individual compartment were required to obtain a coefficient of error of 10%. Of course, if this level of accuracy is needed for additional compartments, then 100–200 particles should be counted over these as well, dramatically increasing the work required. Interestingly, previous stereological studies have also shown that counts of 100–200 events (e.g., test point hits, test intersections, or cell counts) are generally sufficient to obtain precise quantitative structural data in stereological studies (Braendgaard and Gundersen 1986Go; Gundersen 1986Go; Gundersen and Jensen 1987Go; Mayhew 1990Go). Therefore, our findings reinforce this widely used and valuable rule of thumb (Lucocq 1993Go).

Combining systematic sampling with random sampling provides an easy and rapid means of obtaining a sample that is well adapted to analysis of sections placed on EM grids. Although the value of simple random sampling alone is likely to be widely appreciated, its implementation on EM grids is not facile because each random location of a field or scan would need to be identified using randomly generated coordinates. In contrast, in systematic random sampling the array used here is first positioned randomly using a randomly placed grid feature and the array is developed from this location. An additional advantage is that the use of systematic sampling arrays is well known to improve precision of estimates, especially when the sample (e.g., gold labeling distribution) is heterogeneous. Therefore, it is important to ensure that the scans or fields are spread widely over the specimen, even when the labeling is intense. In this case, the number of fields or scans can be maintained by reducing the number of gold particles sampled, e.g., by reducing the width of the scanning aperture/band or by increasing the magnification. Conversely, if the labeling is very low, increasing the number of scans or fields can increase the number of particles counted. In some cases, complete coverage of the section may be required (Pryde et al. 1998Go)

In starting out with this type of analysis, an important consideration is the type of compartments to include in the analysis. A guide to possible labeled compartments is likely to be obtained from an initial qualitative assessment of the labeling pattern. In addition, there may also be useful background information available, such as protein sequence information (presence of membrane/organelle targeting sequences), subcellular fractionation studies, or immunofluorescence localization, which will offer clues about the true location of the antigen. Finally, the number of compartments is expected to have a significant effect on the reproducibility of results. Increasing the number of compartments (at a sampling level of 100–200 particles) will decrease counts on compartments and increase the random variation, especially on weakly labeled structures. However, decreasing the number of compartments will decrease the breadth and resolution of the analysis and, if the number of categories is reduced by pooling categories, the functional relevance of the data may become restricted. In the cases presented here, the number of compartments analyzed was in the range of 10 to 16 (Mayhew et al. 2002Go,2003Go).

What, then, is the significance of the labeling distributions reported here? One must consider the possibility is that the labeling is nonspecific, either because the affinity probe (antibody/PH domain) itself binds to multiple components or because of interactions of the affinity probe with the section (see Griffiths 1993Go for further discussion of specificity and of appropriate controls). However, in the case that gold label is truly specific, it will report on the distribution of antibody binding sites that are accessible to the antibody and therefore will reflect the distribution of antigen. Thus, in contrast to methods that report on the density of the antigen, the present method allows comparison of the total pool sizes of label in different structures. The extent to which the distribution of gold reflects the "true" distribution of antigen is also governed by a variable termed labeling efficiency, which is the average number of gold particles per antigen in the section. On ultrathin sections, this value is known to vary substantially between different compartments, and ultimately the labeling efficiencies of different compartments, in addition to antigen amounts, will govern the proportions of label. Interestingly, much of the labeling efficiency variation on ultrathin cryosections appears to be related to variable penetration into the section and, when this penetration difference is negated, the labeling efficiencies appear to become much more homogeneous (Griffiths and Hoppeler 1986Go; Posthuma et al. 1988Go; Slot et al. 1989Go; Griffiths 1993Go; Oprins et al. 1994Go). Combining the present analysis with more specialized embedding techniques may allow more accurate readouts of relative antigen amounts over different intracellular compartments.

Although the present methods are likely to yield unbiased (or, at least, internally valid) estimates for the compartments to be estimated via their volume, the same may not be true for different membranes. When thin sections are observed by TEM, membrane images may be lost due to technical biases associated with lateral resolution (Paumgartner et al. 1981Go) and tilting of membranes away from the electron axis (Mall et al. 1977Go; Mayhew and Reith 1988Go). These biases are influenced, in turn, by membrane orientation characteristics (Stringer et al. 1982Go; Baddeley et al. 1986Go; Mayhew and Reith 1988Go; Mattfeldt et al. 1990Go; Nyengaard and Gundersen 1992Go). In the present study, we recognized this problem by identifying a separate compartment for unidentified membranes.

In summary, we have presented a simple method for assessing the distribution pattern of labeling over intracellular compartments that employs basic random sampling techniques that are widely employed in stereological analyses. Our results show that a modest effort, counting only 100200 gold particles on each of two EM grids, is sufficient to obtain a reproducible impression of the labeling distribution pattern and, when the labeling is specific, an impression of the distribution of the antigen or other labeled component.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr Janine Illian of SIMBIOS for reading the manuscript and checking the statistics. JML was supported by a Research Leave Fellowship from the Wellcome Trust (059767/Z/99/Z) and by Tenovus Scotland.


    Footnotes
 
Received for publication September 26, 2003; accepted March 11, 2004


    Literature Cited
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Literature Cited
 

Backer JM (2000) Phosphoinositide 3-kinases and the regulation of vesicular trafficking. Mol Cell Biol Res Commun. 4:193–204

Baddeley AJ, Gundersen HJG, Cruz-Orive LM (1986) Estimation of surface area from vertical sections. J Microsc 142:259–276[Medline]

Braendgaard H, Gundersen HJG (1986) The impact of recent stereological advances on quantitative studies of the nervous system. J Neurosci Methods 18:39–78[CrossRef][Medline]

Bretscher A, Chambers D, Nguyen R, Reczek D (2000) ERM-Merlin and EBP50 protein families in plasma membrane organization and function. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 16:113–143[CrossRef][Medline]

Bretscher A, Edwards K, Fehon RG (2002) ERM proteins and merlin: integrators at the cell cortex. Nature Rev Mol Cell Biol. 3:586–599[CrossRef][Medline]

Cruz-Orive LM, Weibel ER (1981) Sampling designs for stereology. J Microsc 122:235–272[Medline]

Cruz-Orive LM, Weibel ER (1990) Recent stereological methods for cell biology: a brief survey. Am J Physiol258:L148–156[Medline]

Defacque H, Bos E, Garvalov B, Barret C, Roy C, Mangeat P, Shin HW, et al. (2002) Phosphoinositides regulate membrane-dependent actin assembly by latex bead phagosomes. Mol Biol Cell 13:1190–1202[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Defacque H, Egeberg M, Habermann A, Diakonova M, Roy C, Mangeat P, Voelter W, et al. (2000) Involvement of ezrin/moesin in de novo actin assembly on phagosomal membranes. EMBO J 19:199–212[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Desjardins M, Huber LA, Parton RG, Griffiths G (1994) Biogenesis of phagolysosomes proceeds through a sequential series of interactions with the endocytic apparatus. J Cell Biol 124:677–688[Abstract]

Fujii J, Matsui T, Heatherly DP, Schlegel KH, Lobo PI, Yutsudo T, Ciraolo GM, et al. (2003) Rapid apoptosis induced by Shiga toxin in HeLa cells. Infect Immun 71:2724–2735[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Griffiths G (1993) Fine Structure Immunocytochemistry. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Springer-Verlag

Griffiths G, Hoppeler H (1986) Quantitation in immunocytochemistry: correlation of immunogold labeling to absolute number of membrane antigens. J Histochem Cytochem 34:1389–1398[Abstract]

Griffiths G, Lucocq JM, Mayhew TM (2001) Electron microscopy applications for quantitative cellular microbiology. Cell Microbiol 3:659–668[CrossRef][Medline]

Gundersen HJG (1986) Stereology of arbitrary particles. A review of unbiased number and size estimators and the presentation of some new ones, in memory of William R. Thompson. J Microsc 143:3–45.

Gundersen HJG, Jensen EB (1987) The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology and its prediction. J Microsc 147:229–263[Medline]

Gundersen HJG, Jensen EB, Kieu K, Nielsen J (1999) The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology—reconsidered. J Microsc 193:199–211[CrossRef][Medline]

Gundersen HJG, Østerby R (1981) Optimizing sampling efficiency of stereological studies in biology: or "Do more less well." J Microsc 121:65–73[Medline]

Gupta M, Mayhew TM, Bedi KS, Sharma AK, White FH (1983) Inter-animal variation and its influence on the overall precision of morphometric estimates based on nested sampling designs. J Microsc 131:147–154[Medline]

Hayat MA (1995) Immunogold-Silver Staining: Principles, Methods, and Applications. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press

Howard CV, Reed MG (1998) Unbiased Stereology. Three-dimensional Measurement in Microscopy. Oxford, Bios Scientific Publishers

Jahraus A, Tjelle TE, Berg T, Habermann A, Storrie B, Ullrich O, Griffiths G (1998) In vitro fusion of phagosomes with different endocytic organelles from J774 macrophages. J Biol Chem 273:30379–30390[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lucocq J (1992) Quantitation of gold labeling and estimation of labeling efficiency with a stereological counting method. J Histochem Cytochem 40:1929–1936[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lucocq JM (1993) Unbiased 3-D quantitation of ultrastructure in cell biology. Trends Cell Biol 3:345–358

Lucocq JM (1994) Quantitation of gold labeling and antigens in immunolabeled ultrathin sections. J Anat 184:1–13[Medline]

Lucocq JM (2003) Electron microscopy in cell biology. In Davey J, Lord M, eds. Essential Cell Biology. New York, Oxford University Press, 53–112

Lucocq JM, Berger E, Warren G (1989) Mitotic Golgi fragments in HeLa cells and their role in the reassembly pathway. J Cell Biol 109:463–474[Abstract]

Lucocq JM, Brada D, Roth R (1986) Immunolocalisation of the oligosaccharide trimming enzyme glucosidase II. J Cell Biol 102:2137–2146[Abstract]

Lucocq J, Manifava M, Bi K, Roth MG, Ktistakis NT (2001) Immunolocalisation of phospholipase D1 on tubular vesicular membranes of endocytotic and secretory origin. Eur J Cell Biol 79:508–520

Mall G, Kayser K, Rossner JA (1977) The loss of membrane images from oblique sectioning of biological membranes and the availability of morphometric principles as demonstrated by the examination of heart muscle mitochondria. Mikroskopie 33:246–254[Medline]

Mattfeldt T, Mall G, Gharehbaghi H, Mueller P (1990) Estimation of surface area and length with the orientator. J Microsc 159:301–317[Medline]

Mayhew T, Griffiths G, Habermann A, Lucocq J, Emre N, Webster P (2003) A simpler way of comparing the labeling densities of cellular compartments illustrated using data from VPARP and LAMP-1 immunogold labeling experiments. Histochem Cell Biol 119:333–341[Medline]

Mayhew TM (1979) Isolated peritoneal macrophages: component biased sampling. In Weibel ER, ed. Stereological Methods. Vol 1. Practical Methods for Biological Morphometry. London, New York Academic Press, 331–337

Mayhew TM (1990) Efficient and unbiased sampling of nerve fibers for estimating fiber number and size. In Conn PM, ed. Methods in Neuroscience. Vol 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Microscopy. New York, London, Academic Press, 172–187

Mayhew TM (1991) The new stereological methods for interpreting functional morphology from slices of cells and organs. Exp Physiol 76:639–665[Medline]

Mayhew TM (1992) A review of recent advances in stereology for quantifying neural structure. J Neurocytol 21:313–328[Medline]

Mayhew TM, Lucocq JM, Griffiths G (2002) Relative labeling index: a novel stereological approach to test for non-random immunogold labeling of organelles and membranes on tranmission electron microscopy thin sections. J Microsc 205:153–164[CrossRef][Medline]

Mayhew TM, Reith ER (1988) Practical ways to correct cytomembrane surface densities for the loss of membrane images that results from oblique sectioning. In Reith A, Mayhew RM, eds. Stereology and Morphometry in Electron Microscopy. Problems and Solutions. New York, Hemisphere Publishing, 99–110

Mironov A, Latawiec D, Wille H, Bouzamondo-Bernstein E, Legname G, Williamson RA, Burton D, et al. (2003) Cytosolic prion protein in neurons. J Neurosci 23:7183–7193[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Murray JT, Panaretou C, Stenmark H, Miaczynska M, Backer JM (2002) Role of Rab5 in the recruitment of hVps34/p150 to the early endosome. Traffic 3:416–427[CrossRef][Medline]

Nyengaard JR, Gundersen HJG (1992) The isector: a simple and direct method for generating isotropic, uniform random sections from small specimens. J Microsc 165:427–431

Ochs M, Johnen G, Miller K-M, Wahlers T, Hawgood S, Richter J, Brasch F (2002) Intracellular and intraalveolar localization of surfactant protein A (SP-A) in the parenchymal region of the human lung. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 26:91–98[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Oprins A, Geuze HJ, Slot JW (1994) Cryosubstitution dehydration of aldehyde-fixed tissue: a favorable approach to quantitative immunocytochemistry. J Histochem Cytochem 42:497–503[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Paumgartner D, Losa G, Weibel ER (1981) Resolution effect on the stereological estimation of surface and volume and its interpretation in terms of fractal dimensions. J Microsc 121:51–63[Medline]

Posthuma G, Slot JW, Veenendaal T, Geuze HJ (1988) Immunogold determination of amylase concentrations in pancreatic subcellular compartments. Eur J Cell Biol 46:327–335[Medline]

Pryde JG, Farmaki T, Lucocq JM (1998) Okadaic acid induces selective arrest of protein transport in the rough endoplasmic reticulum and prevents export into COPII-coated structures. Mol Cell Biol 18:1125–1135[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rouille Y, Rohn W, Hoflack B (2000) Targeting of lysosomal proteins. Semin Cell Dev Biol 11:165–171[CrossRef][Medline]

Shay J (1975) Economy of effort in electron microscope morphometry. Am J Pathol 81:503–512[Abstract]

Siegel S (1956) Non Parametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. Tokyo, McGraw–Hill Kogakusha

Slot JW, Posthuma G, Chang LY, Crapo JD, Geuze HJ (1989) Quantitative aspects of immunogold labeling in embedded and in nonembedded sections. Am J Anat 185:271–281[Medline]

Stringer BMJ, Wynford-Thomas D, Williams ED (1982) Physical randomisation of tissue architecture: an alternative to systematic sampling. J Microsc 126:179–182[Medline]

Tokuyasu KT (1973) A technique for ultracryotomy of cell suspensions and tissues. J Cell Biol 57:551–565[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tokuyasu KT (1978) A study of positive staining of ultrathin frozen sections. J Ultrastruct Res 63:287–307[Medline]

Vanhaesebroeck B, Leevers SJ, Ahmadi K, Timms J, Katso R, Driscoll PC, Woscholski R, et al. (2001) Synthesis and function of 3-phosphorylated inositol lipids. Annu Rev Biochem 70:535–602[CrossRef][Medline]

Watt SA, Kular G, Fleming IN, Downes CP, Lucocq JM (2002) Subcellular localisation of phosphatidylinositol (4,5) bisphosphate using the PH domain of phospholipase C d1. Biochem J 363:657–666[CrossRef][Medline]

Weibel ER (1979) Stereological Methods. Vol 1. Practical Methods for Biological Morphometry. New York, Academic Press