Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, Vol. 46, 101-108, Copyright © 1998 by The Histochemical Society, Inc.


ARTICLE

Immunocytochemical Localization of the Prohormone Convertases PC1 and PC2 in Rat Prolactin Cells

Laurent Muller1,a, Renée Picarta, Alain Barreta, Nabil G. Seidahb, and Claude Tougarda
a Groupe de Biologie de la Cellule Neuroendocrine, INSERM U36, Collège de France, Paris, France
b Biochemical Neuroendocrinology, Clinical Research Institute of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Correspondence to: Claude Tougard, Groupe de Biologie de la Cellule Neuroendocrine, INSERM U 36, Collège de France, 11 Place Marcelin Berthelot, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France.


  Summary
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

The prohormone convertases PC1 and PC2 are subtilisin-related endopeptidases that process prohormone and neuropeptide precursors. Using different ultrastructural immunocytochemical approaches, we have investigated their intracellular distribution in a neuroendocrine cell type that has not been examined thus far, the rat anterior pituitary lactotrope. These cells secrete mainly prolactin and also express the neuroendocrine-specific protein secretogranin II, which is considered a peptide precursor. Our study provides evidence for the expression of PC1 and PC2 in rat lactotropes and provides new information on their subcellular localization. Apart from their presence in the secretory granules, PC1 and PC2 displayed different major localization along the secretory pathway. PC1 immunoreactivity was concentrated in the Golgi apparatus, whereas PC2 immunoreactivity was prominent in the rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER). These observations provide morphological support for previous biochemical analysis of proPC1 and proPC2 post-translational processing, which has demonstrated that PC1 exits very rapidly from the RER, whereas PC2 is retained much longer in this compartment. (J Histochem Cytochem 46:101-108, 1998)

Key Words: prohormone convertases, PC1, PC2, rat anterior pituitary, lactotropes, electron microscope, immunoperoxidase, immunogold


  Introduction
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

The last post-translational modifications resulting in the production of active hormones and neuropeptides consist of the endoproteolytic cleavage of the precursors, followed by exoproteolytic cleavage and N-terminal acetylation and/or C-terminal amidation. Two mammalian endoproteases related to Kex2 have recently been cloned and named prohormone convertases 1 and 2 (PC1 and PC2) (Smeekens and Steiner 1990 ; Seidah et al. 1990 , Seidah et al. 1991 ; Smeekens et al. 1991 ). They are specifically expressed in several neuroendocrine cells and neurons (Seidah et al. 1990 , Seidah et al. 1991 ; Smeekens et al. 1991 ) and cleave the precursors at dibasic sites (Benjannet et al. 1991 ; Thomas et al. 1991 ).

The cloning of these enzymes has provided specific tools that allow the study of their expression in neuroendocrine tissues. In situ hybridization experiments have shown that PC1 is the major PC expressed in the anterior pituitary and that PC2 is also present in substantial amounts in this tissue (Day et al. 1992 ). The analysis of the anterior pituitary cell types expressing these enzymes was, however, restricted to the corticotropes because they are the only pituitary cells that express a major precursor that is endoproteolytically processed into active peptides, i.e., pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) (Day et al. 1992 ). Immunocytochemistry was not performed to identify other pituitary cells that express PC1 and PC2. This questioned the pattern of expression of the PCs in this heterogeneous tissue as well as the substrate of these enzymes. The other anterior pituitary cell types, i.e., lactotropes, somatotropes, thyrotropes, and gonadotropes, are not specialized in the secretion of a proteolytic maturation product. However, all of them express proteins of the granin family, which contains three major members: chromogranin A (CgA) and B (CgB) and secretogranin II (SgII) (reviewed in Huttner et al. 1991a , Huttner et al. 1991b ; Winkler and Fisher-Colbrie 1992 ; Fisher-Colbrie et al. 1995 ). The exact function of these proteins is not definitely established, but they are considered as peptide precursors (reviewed in Natori and Huttner 1994 ). CgA is the precursor of several peptides whose activities have been well documented (reviewed in Iacangelo and Eiden 1995 ), and proteolytic fragments of CgB and SgII have also been purified from tissue extracts (reviewed in Winkler and Fisher-Colbrie 1992 ; Fisher-Colbrie et al. 1995 ). More recently, a direct precursor-product relationship between SgII and several derived peptides has been demonstrated by pulse-chase experiments (Dittie and Tooze 1995 ; Muller and Tougard 1995 ), and the activity of secretoneurin, a peptide derived from SgII, has been proposed (Kirchmair et al. 1993 ; Saria et al. 1993 ). We have already reported the expression of SgII in prolactin (PRL) cells (Tougard et al. 1989 ; Ozawa et al. 1994 ) and demonstrated its processing in the TGN and secretory granules (Muller and Tougard 1995 ; Muller et al. 1997 ). Because PC1 and PC2 are the best candidates for SgII processing, we have studied the expression of PC1 and PC2 in PRL cells by electron microscopic immunocytochemistry. Our results provide the first evidence for the expression of both enzymes in this cell type. Our ultrastructural study also shows that PC1 and PC2 display different subcellular distributions along the secretory pathway that correlate with the steps of their post-translational processing.


  Materials and Methods
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Antibodies
We used rabbit polyclonal antibodies directed against the carboxy terminal segment of mPC1 (AbC-mPC1; segment 629-726) (Seidah et al. 1991 ) and the C-terminal segment of mPC2 (AbC-mPC2; segment 529-637) (Seidah et al. 1990 ). The specificity of these antibodies was previously well documented by immunohistochemical (Marcinkiewicz et al. 1993 ) and immunoprecipitation techniques (Benjannet et al. 1993 ). The specificity of rabbit antiserum raised against purified rat PRL RP-3 (a gift from NIDDK) has been described in detail elsewhere (Duhau et al. 1991 ).

Pre-embedding Immunoperoxidase Staining
This labeling was performed directly on rat anterior pituitary cells in primary culture as previously described (Tougard et al. 1980 ; Tougard and Picart 1986 ). Briefly, cells were obtained by enzymatic dispersion of male Wistar rat (weight 200 g) anterior pituitaries, as described elsewhere (Tixier-Vidal et al. 1973 ). For experiments, 4 x 105 cells were plated per 35-mm tissue culture dish in 2 ml of Ham's F 12 medium supplemented with 10% horse serum, 2.5 % fetal calf serum, and antibiotics. Cells were grown for 7 days at 37C in 5% CO2. They were fixed in periodate-lysine-paraformaldehyde (MacLean and Nakane 1974 ) for 2 hr at room temperature (RT), washed, preincubated in 50 mM NH4Cl, and permeabilized with 0.005% saponin. After incubation with specific rabbit antibodies, cells were incubated with goat Fab anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with peroxidase (Biosys; Compiègne, France). After washing, cells were postfixed in 1% glutaraldehyde and the peroxidase activity was visualized using 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride. Cells were postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide, dehydrated, and embedded in situ in Epon according to Brinkley et al. 1967 . Selected areas of immunoreactive cells were sectioned as previously described (Picart and Tixier-Vidal 1974 ). Ultrathin sections were examined at the electron microscope without further staining.

Postembedding Immunogold Staining
Small pieces of male Wistar rat anterior pituitaries were fixed with a mixture of 4% paraformaldehyde-0.05% glutaraldehyde in 0.1M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) for 2 hr at 4C. After washing, the tissues were treated with 2% uranyl acetate in 50 mM maleate buffer for 2 hr at 4C, partially dehydrated, and embedded in LR White according to Ozawa et al. 1994 .

Ultrathin sections were immunostained as previously reported (Ozawa et al. 1994 ). Briefly, they were incubated with the first specific antibodies for 2 hr and stained with 10-nm protein A-gold particles (Biocell; Cardiff, UK) for 1.5 hr. After rinsing, the sections were air-dried, stained for 15 min with osmium tetroxide vapors, and for 15 sec with 2% uranyl acetate in 50% alcohol. The grids were finally rinsed in alcohol, dried, and examined under the electron microscope. Control sections were obtained by omitting incubation with the specific antibodies or by replacing it with normal rabbit serum.

Double immunostaining
Double Immunogold Staining. The double staining was performed on the same face of the grid. After the first complete immunostaining (i.e., incubation with the first specific antibodies and then with 10-nm protein A-gold particles), the grids were incubated for l hr with unconjugated protein A (0.1 mg/ml in TBS) (Sigma; St Louis, MO), as previously described (Ozawa et al. 1994 ). After rinsing, they were incubated with the second specific antibodies and then with 5-nm protein A-gold particles. After washes, they were finally stained and dried as described above for single immunolabeling. Control sections of the double immunostaining were performed by omitting incubation with the second specific antibody or by replacing it with normal rabbit serum.

Double Pre- and Postembedding Immunostaining. After the pre-embedding immunoperoxidase staining of PC1 or PC2 in rat anterior pituitary cells in primary culture (as described above), ultrathin sections of immunoreactive cells were then immunostained using the postembedding immunogold approach, with antiserum against rat PRL and then with 10-nm protein A-gold particles.

Western Blotting
Rat anterior pituitaries were homogenized at 4C in a lysis buffer (0.01 M PBS, pH 7.4, containing 0.5% sodium deoxycholate and 0.5% Nonidet P40) in the presence of 200 µM PMSF, 1 µM leupeptin, and 1 µM pepstatin. GH3B6 rat tumor PRL cells, cultured for 6 days, were scraped on ice in the same buffer. Lysates were then centrifuged for 10 min at 15,000 x g at 4C and the supernatants were further solubilized with SDS-PAGE sample buffer containing 50 mM DTT. After separation by SDS-PAGE, proteins were electrotransferred to nitrocellulose sheets (Schleicher & Schuell; Keene, NH). After incubation with the specific antibodies, immunoreactive proteins were revealed with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated sheep anti-rabbit IgG antibodies (Promega; Madison, WI).


  Results
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Using both immunoperoxidase and immunogold labeling, PC1 and PC2 were detected in most of the glandular cells of the rat anterior pituitary in situ and in primary culture. The immunoreactive sites corresponded to the intracellular compartments involved in the secretory pathway. Differences in the intensity of the immunolabeling and in the respective subcellular distribution of the two PCs were conspicuous, even at low magnification, using the pre-embedding approach and immunoperoxidase staining. With this approach and whatever the cell type, the intensity of PC1 labeling was always higher than that of PC2 (compare Figure 1 and Figure 2). PC1-specific immunoperoxidase staining concerned mainly the Golgi stacks, which were conspicuously labeled in all glandular cells. The rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER) cisternae were very slightly labeled (Figure 1). On the contrary, PC2 was detected only in the RER cisternae (Figure 2). The Golgi saccules were not immunostained. With this approach, as has been previously described for secretory products (Tougard and Picart 1986 ), the secretory granules were only weakly labeled. To investigate the presence of the PCs within these organelles, we performed an immunogold labeling using a postembedding approach. Some gold particles specific for PC1 (Figure 3a) or for PC2 (Figure 3b) were observed within the matrix of several secretory granules in all glandular cells (Figure 3).



View larger version (164K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. PC1 immunolabeling in anterior pituitary cells in primary culture revealed using the pre-embedding immunoperoxidase staining. At this low magnification, PC1 is detected mainly in the Golgi (G) stacks (double arrows) in all glandular cells. The RER cisternae (arrows) are very slightly stained. Bar = 1 µm.

Figure 2. PC2 immunolabeling in anterior pituitary cells in primary culture revealed using the pre-embedding immunoperoxidase staining. At this low magnification, PC2 is detected associated with the membrane of several RER cisternae (arrows) in some glandular cells. The smooth saccules in the Golgi zone (G) are not immunostained. Bar = 1 µm.



View larger version (143K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. PC1 (a) and PC2 (b) immunolabeling in anterior pituitary revealed using postembedding immunogold staining. (a) Ten-nm gold particles revealing immunoreactive PC1 are observed on the matrix of many secretory granules (arrows) in this unidentified glandular cell. (b) Ten-nm gold particles revealing immunoreactive PC2 are observed on the matrix of some secretory granules (arrows) in this unidentified glandular cell. Bars = 0.2 um.

Because the present study was focused on the immunolocalization of the PCs in PRL cells, we performed double immunostaining of either PC1 or PC2 and of PRL to specifically identify the PRL cells. These double immunostainings confirmed that PRL cells expressed both PC1 and PC2. Using a combination of pre- and postembedding approaches and immunoperoxidase to localize the PCs and immunogold to identify PRL cells, intense and preferential distribution of PC1 within the Golgi saccules (Figure 4) and preferential localization of PC2 on the membrane of the flattened RER cisternae (Figure 5), characteristic of PRL cells, were confirmed in PRL cells. The specific hormonal product, visualized with immunogold, was detected on the matrix of immature and mature secretory granules (Figure 4 and Figure 5). The double immunogold staining with anti-PC1 or anti-PC2 and anti-PRL also confirmed that the two PCs are present in at least some PRL secretory granules (Figure 6). Because the gold particles corresponding to immunoreactive PC1 or PC2 were less numerous than those corresponding to immunoreactive PRL, a portion of the PRL secretory granules appeared devoid of detectable PCs.



View larger version (146K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Double pre- and postembedding immunolabeling of PC1 (pre-embedding immunoperoxidase) and PRL (postembedding immunogold) in a PRL cell in primary culture. Immunoreactive PC1 is detected in all the Golgi saccules (arrows). Ten-nm gold particles revealing immunoreactive PRL are observed on the matrix of immature secretory granules in the Golgi zone (G) and on the matrix of mature secretory granules. Bar = 1 µm.

Figure 5. Double pre- and postembedding immunolabeling of PC2 (pre-embedding immunoperoxidase) and PRL (postembedding immunogold) in a PRL cell in primary culture. Immunoreactive PC2 is detected on the membrane of the flattened RER cisternae (arrows). The smooth saccules of the Golgi zone (G) are devoid of peroxidase reaction product. Ten-nm gold particles revealing immunoreactive PRL are observed on the matrix of immature and mature secretory granules. Bar = 1 µm.



View larger version (139K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Double immunogold labeling of PC1 or PC2 (10-nm gold) and PRL (5-nm gold) in PRL cells in anterior pituitary. A few 10-nm gold particles revealing (a) immunoreactive PC1 (arrows) or (b) immunoreactive PC2 (arrows) are observed on the matrix of the major part of the secretory granules, whereas many 5-nm gold particles revealing immunoreactive PRL are observed on all secretory granules. (c) Control section after omission of the first specific antibodies and incubation with protein A(pA)-gold 10-nm. No gold particle is observed. (d) Control section afer immunostaining of PC2 with protein A-gold 10-nm, incubation with unconjugated protein A, omission of anti-PRL, and incubation with protein A(pA)-gold 5-nm. No particle of 5-nm gold is observed, indicating a total blockade of protein A binding sites after the first immunostaining sequence. Bars = 0.2 µm.

The presence of PC1 and PC2, in the rat anterior pituitary and in the GH3B6 rat PRL cell line was confirmed by the immunoblotting analysis. The antibodies specific for the C-terminal segment of either PC1 or PC2 recognized two large bands in both cell extracts, as already described in the literature. The anti-PC1 antibodies detected a 91-kD band that corresponds to the precursor form and an 84-kD band that corresponds to the mature enzyme (Figure 7). The anti-PC2 antibodies also detected two bands of 75 kD and 65 kD that correspond to the precursor form and to the mature enzyme, respectively (Figure 7). However, the intensity of the immunolabeled bands varied in the two cell extracts. Whereas the dominant form of PC2 was the mature enzyme in the anterior pituitary extracts, pro-PC2 and mature PC2 were as intensely labeled in the GH3B6 cell extracts. This difference was not observed for PC1. These discrepancies could be related to the difference in post-translational processing of the two enzymes (see Discussion) and to the difference in the storage compartment of our two cell models. Most of the glandular cells of the anterior pituitary contained many large secretory granules, whereas GH3B6 cells were characterized by very few small secretory granules.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Immunoblotting of PC1 and PC2 in protein extracts of rat anterior pituitaries (Lanes 1 and 3) and GH3B6 cells (Lanes 2 and 4). The proteins (25 µg per lane) were separated by SDS-PAGE on 7.5% gels in the presence of 50 mM DTT, electrotransferred, and immunostained using either anti-PC1 (Lanes 1 and 2) or anti-PC2 (Lanes 3 and 4) antibodies. The position of the molecular weight standards is indicated at left (kD).


  Discussion
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

In the present work, we provide immunocytochemical evidence for the expression of PC1 and PC2 in rat lactotropes.

Previous works have demonstrated the cell-specific distribution of PC1 and PC2 in several neuroendocrine and endocrine cells. These studies were related to the expression of these enzymes in pancreatic ß-cells (Smeekens et al. 1992 ; Malide et al. 1995 ) and in pituitary cells that express POMC (Seidah et al. 1990 , Seidah et al. 1991 ; Day et al. 1992 ), i.e., in melanotropes of the intermediate lobe and in corticotropes of the anterior lobe. The only data reported thus far for other cell types of the anterior pituitary suggested the expression of PC1 in gonadotropes (Marcinkiewicz et al. 1993 ). This was, however, not restricted to this cell type, and our study indeed identifies, for the first time, the lactotropes as one of the cell types of the anterior pituitary that express both PC1 and PC2. The presence of these two PCs in PRL cells was confirmed by their immunochemical detection in GH3B6 cells, a homogeneous model of rat PRL cells.

The present work also provides original information about the subcellular distribution of these proteolytic enzymes. Both are present in the secretory granules of these cells, but they display other different major localization sites along the secretory pathway. PC1 is mainly observed in the Golgi apparatus and PC2 in the RER. As has been previously pointed out for the immunolabeling of PRL (Tougard et al. 1980 ), the two immunocytochemical procedures performed in this study provide complementary information. The pre-embedding approach, using a moderate permeabilization step and immunoperoxidase, is the best approach to detect secretory products within the RER and the Golgi stacks, whereas the postembedding approach, using immunogold, permits the best detection within the matrix of secretory granules.

Several groups had already shown the presence of PC2 (Guest et al. 1992 ; Smeekens et al. 1992 ; Malide et al. 1995 ) and PC1 (Malide et al. 1995 ) in the secretory granules of ß-cells. The most recent of these studies has co-localized PC1 and PC2 in the same secretory granules (Malide et al. 1995 ). The concentration of PC1 immunoreactivity in the Golgi apparatus that we observed in the present work is in agreement with the distribution of PC1 in AtT-20 cells already described (Hornby et al. 1993 ). PC2 immunoreactivity was more prominent in the RER. These observations are consistent with biochemical data concerning proPC1 and proPC2 post-translational processing. PC1 exits from the RER after cleavage of its propeptide within 10 min after synthesis (Benjannet et al. 1993 ; Zhou and Lindberg 1993 ; Lindberg 1994 ; Zhou and Mains 1994 ). PC2 processing is much slower. The cleavage of the propeptide occurs hours after synthesis, and analysis of PC2 glycosylation as well as transport blockade experiments have demonstrated that proPC2 is retained in the RER (Guest et al. 1992 ; Benjannet et al. 1993 ; Shen et al. 1993 ; Zhou and Mains 1994 ). ProPC2's unique post-translational processing is related to its interaction with the neuroendocrine protein 7B2 (Braks and Martens 1994 ; Benjannet et al. 1995 ; Zhu and Lindberg 1995 ). Whereas PC2 is not further processed after the cleavage of the propeptide, PC1 is truncated at the C-terminus (Vindrola and Lindberg 1992 ) in the TGN or in the secretory granules (Lindberg 1994 ; Zhou and Mains 1994 ). We cannot visualize this truncated form because the antibodies used in our study are specific for the C-terminal segment of PC1. All these data are in agreement with the differential distribution of PC1 and PC2 in the RER and the Golgi stacks that we observed using the pre-embedding immunoperoxidase staining.

The presence of both PCs in PRL cells raises the question of the precursors that are proteolytically processed within these cells. The major secretory product of lactotropes is PRL, which is released into the medium without further major proteolytic processing other than the removal of the signal peptide in the RER. Some minor proteolytic products have been identified but do not correspond to potential cleavage sites by a PC (reviewed in Sinha 1995 ). Other secretory proteins expressed in PRL cells may be the substrates proteolytically processed by PC1 and PC2. We have already demonstrated the presence of Sg II and Cg B in PRL cells (Tougard et al. 1989 ; Ozawa et al. 1994 ) as well as the proteolytic processing of Sg II in the anterior pituitary cells in primary culture and in GH3B6 cells and stimulation of release of SgII-derived peptides by thyroliberin (TRH) (Muller and Tougard 1995 ; Muller at al. 1997). This result had suggested that the lactotropes and possibly the thyrotropes could process Sg II. Moreover, stable overexpression of PC2 in PC12 had suggested the role of this convertase in the processing of Sg II (Dittie and Tooze 1995 ), whereas infection of GH4C1 with PC1 and PC2 suggested the involvement of PC1 in the cleavage of Sg II (Hoflehner et al. 1995 ). Our study provides evidence for the presence of both enzymes within PRL secretory granules and hence cannot distinguish which PC is involved in the processing of SgII in these cells. PC1 and PC2 could also be involved in the proteolytic processing of neuropeptide precursors, such as pro-TRH, that have been found in the rat anterior pituitary (cf. rev. Tougard and Tixier-Vidal 1994 ) and which can be cleaved by these PCs (Friedman et al. 1995 ; Pu et al. 1996 ).

In conclusion, the observations reported here demonstrate the expression of PC1 and PC2 in lactotropes of the rat anterior pituitary and strengthen the role of these two prohormone convertases in the proteolytic maturation of precursors of secretory proteins within this cell type.


  Footnotes

1 Present address: Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, LSUMC, New Orleans, LA.


  Acknowledgments

Supported by grants from INSERM (U 36).

We gratefully acknowledge Dr Iris Lindberg (New Orleans) for helpful discussions. We also thank Eric Etienne for the photographic work. We acknowledge the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive, and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) for the gift of reference rat PRL (rat PRL-RP3).

Received for publication April 28, 1997; accepted July 10, 1997.


  Literature Cited
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Benjannet S, Rondeau N, Day R, Chretien M, Seidah NG (1991) PC1 and PC2 are proprotein convertases capable of cleaving proopiomelanocortin at distinct pairs of basic residues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:3564-3568[Abstract]

Benjannet S, Rondeau N, Paquet L, Boudreault A, Chretien M, Seidah NG (1993) Comparative biosynthesis, covalent post-translational modifications and efficiency of prosegment cleavage of prohormone convertases PC1 and PC2: glycosylation, sulphation and identification of the intracellular site of prosegment cleavage of PC1 and PC2. Biochem J 294:735-743[Medline]

Benjannet S, Savaria D, Chretien M, Seidah NG (1995) 7B2 is a specific binding protein of the prohormone convertase PC2. J Neurochem 64:2303-2311[Medline]

Braks JAM, Martens GJM (1994) 7B2 is a neuroendocrine chaperone that transiently interacts with prohormone convertase PC2 in the secretory pathway. Cell 78:263-273[Medline]

Brinkley BR, Murphy P, Richardson LC (1967) Procedure for embedding in situ selected cells cultured in vitro. J Cell Biol 35:279-283[Free Full Text]

Day R, Schafer MKH, Watson SJ, Chretien M, Seidah NG (1992) Distribution and regulation of the prohormone convertases PC1 and PC2 in the rat pituitary. Mol Endocrinol 6:485-497[Abstract]

Dittie AS, Tooze SA (1995) Characterization of the endopeptidase PC2 activity towards secretogranin II in stably transfected PC12 cells. Biochem J 310:777-787[Medline]

Duhau L, Grassi J, Grouselle D, Enjalbert A, Grognet JM (1991) An enzyme immunoassay for rat prolactin: application to the determination of plasma levels. J Immunoassay 12:233-250[Medline]

Fisher-Colbrie R, Laslop A, Kirchmair R (1995) Secretogranin II: molecular properties, regulation of biosynthesis and processing to the neuropeptide secretoneurin. Prog Neurobiol 46:49-70[Medline]

Friedman TC, Loh PY, Cawley NX, Birch NP, Huang SS, Jackson IMD, Nillni EA (1995) Processing of prothyrotropin-releasing hormone (pro-TRH) by bovine intermediate lobe secretory vesicle membrane PC1 and PC2 enzymes. Endocrinology 136:4462-4472[Abstract]

Guest PC, Arden SD, Bennet DL, Clark A, Rutherford NG, Hutton JC (1992) The post-translational processing and intracellular sorting of PC2 in the islets of Langerhans. J Biol Chem 267:22401-22406[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hoflehner J, Eder U, Laslop A, Seidah NG, Fisher-Colbrie R, Winkler HTI (1995) Processing of secretogranin II by prohormone convertases: importance of PC1 in the generation of secretoneurin. FEBS Lett 360:294-298[Medline]

Hornby PJ, Rosenthal SD, Mathis JP, Vindrola O, Lindberg I (1993) Immunocyto-chemical localization of the neuropeptide-synthesizing enzyme PC1 in AtT-20 cells. Neuroendocrinology 58:555-563[Medline]

Huttner WB, Gerdes HH, Rosa P (1991a) Chromogranins/secretogranins--widespread constituents of the secretory granule matrix in endocrine cells and neurons. In Gratzl M, Langley K, eds. Markers for Neural and Endocrine Cells. Molecular Cell Biology, Diagnostic Applications. Weinheim, VCH,93-131

Huttner WB, Gerdes HH, Rosa P (1991b) The granin (chromogranin/secretogranin) family. Trends Biochem Sci 16:27-30[Medline]

Iacangelo AL, Eiden LE (1995) Chromogranin A current status as a precursor for bioactive peptides and a granulogenic/sorting factor in the regulated secretory pathway. Regul Pept 58:65-88[Medline]

Kirchmair R, Hogue-Angeletti R, Guttierez J, Fisher-Colbrie R, Winkler H (1993) Secretoneurin--a neuropeptide generated in brain, adrenal medulla and other neuroendocrine tissues by proteolytic processing of secretogranin II (chromogranin C). Neuroscience 53:359-365[Medline]

Lindberg I (1994) Evidence for the cleavage of the PC1/PC3 pro-segment in the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol Cell Neurosci 5:263-268[Medline]

MacLean IW, Nakane PK (1974) Periodate-lysine-paraformaldehyde fixative. A new fixative for immunoelectron microscopy. J Histochem Cytochem 22:1077-1083[Medline]

Malide D, Seidah NG, Chretien M, Bendayan M (1995) Electron microscopic immunocytochemical evidence for the involvement of the convertases PC1 and PC2 in the processing of proinsulin in pancreatic ß-cells. J Histochem Cytochem 43:11-19[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Marcinkiewicz M, Day R, Seidah NG, Chretien M (1993) Ontogeny of the prohormone convertases PC1 and PC2 in the mouse hypophysis and their colocalization with corticotropin and {alpha}-melanotropin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:4922-4926[Abstract]

Muller L, Barret A, Picart R, Tougard C (1997) Proteolytic processing of sulfated secretogranin II in the trans-Golgi network of GH3B6 cells. J Biol Chem 272:3669-3673[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Muller L, Tougard C (1995) Production and secretion of N-terminal secretogranin II derived peptides in GH3B6 prolactin cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 112:101-112[Medline]

Natori S, Huttner WB (1994) Peptides derived from the granins (chromogranins/-secretogranins). Biochimie 76:277-282[Medline]

Ozawa H, Picart R, Barret A, Tougard C (1994) Heterogeneity in the pattern of distribution of the specific hormonal product and secretogranins within the secretory granules of rat prolactin cells. J Histochem Cytochem 42:1097-1107[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Picart R, Tixier-Vidal A (1974) Description d'une méthode permettant la sélection et l'étude ultrastructurale de plages cellulaires dans les monocouches hétérogènes cultivées en flacons de plastique. J Microsc 20:80a

Pu LP, Ma W, Barker JL, Loh YP (1996) Differential coexpression of genes encoding prothyrotropin-releasing hormone (pro-TRH) and prohormone convertases (PC1 and PC2) in rat brain neurons: implications for differential processing of pro-TRH. Endocrinology 137:1233-1241[Abstract]

Saria A, Troger J, Kirchmair R, Fisher-Colbrie R, Hogue-Angeletti R, Winkler H (1993) Secretoneurin releases dopamine from rat striatal slices: a biological effect of a peptide derived from secretogranin II (chromogranin C). Neuroscience 54:1-4[Medline]

Seidah NG, Gaspar L, Mion P, Marcinkiewicz M, Mbikay M, Chretien M (1990) cDNA sequence of two distinct pituitary proteins homologous to Kex2 and furin gene products: tissue-specific mRNAs encoding candidates for prohormone processing proteinases. DNA Cell Biol 9:415-424[Medline]

Seidah NG, Marcinkiewicz M, Benjannet S, Gaspar L, Beaubien G, Mattei MG, Lazure C, Mbikay M, Chretien M (1991) Cloning and primary sequence of a mouse candidate prohormone convertase PC1 homologous to PC2, furin and Kex2: distinct chromosomal localization and messenger RNA distribution in brain and pituitary compared to PC2. Mol Endocrinol 5:111-122[Abstract]

Shen FS, Seidah NG, Lindberg I (1993) Biosynthesis of the prohormone convertase PC2 in Chinese hamster ovary cells and in rat insulinoma cells. J Biol Chem 268:24910-24915[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sinha YN (1995) Structural variants of prolactin: occurrence and physiological significance. Endocrine Rev 16:354-369[Medline]

Smeekens SP, Avruch AS, LaMendola J, Chan SJ, Steiner DF (1991) Identification of a cDNA encoding a second putative prohormone convertase related to PC2 in AtT-20 and islets of Langerhans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:340-344[Abstract]

Smeekens SP, Montag AG, Thomas G, Albiges-Rizo C, Carroll R, Benig M, Phillips LA, Martin S, Ohagi S, Gardner P, Swift HH, Steiner DF (1992) Proinsulin processing by the subtilisin-related proprotein convertases furin, PC2 and PC3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:8822-8826[Abstract]

Smeekens SP, Steiner DF (1990) Identification of a human insulinoma cDNA encoding a novel mammalian protein structurally related to the yeast dibasic processing protease Kex2. J Biol Chem 265:2997-3000[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Thomas L, Leduc R, Thorne BA, Smeekens SP, Steiner DF (1991) Kex2-like endoproteases PC2 and PC3 accurately cleave a model prohormone in mammalian cells: evidence for a common core of neuroendocrine processing enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:5297-5301[Abstract]

Tixier-Vidal A, Kerdelhué B, Jutisz M (1973) Kinetics of release of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) by primary cultures of dispersed rat anterior pituitary cells. Chronic effect of synthetic LH and FSH releasing hormone. Life Sci 12:499-509

Tougard C, Nasciutti LE, Picart R, Tixier-Vidal A, Huttner WB (1989) Subcellular distribution of secretogranins I and II in GH3 rat tumoral prolactin cells as revealed by electron microscopic immunocytochemistry. J Histochem Cytochem 37:1329-1336[Abstract]

Tougard C, Picart R (1986) Use of pre-embedding ultrastructural immunocytochemistry in the localization of a secretory product and membrane proteins in cultured prolactin cells. Am J Anat 175:161-177[Medline]

Tougard C, Picart R, Tixier-Vidal A (1980) Electron microscopic cytochemical studies on the secretory process in rat prolactin cells in primary culture. Am J Anat 158:471-490[Medline]

Tougard C, Tixier-Vidal A (1994) Lactotropes and Gonadotropes. In Knobil ED, Neill J, eds. The Physiology of Reproduction. 2nd Ed. New York, Raven Press, 1711-1747

Vindrola O, Lindberg I (1992) Biosynthesis of the prohormone convertase PC1 in AtT-20 cells. Mol Endocrinol 6:1088-1094[Abstract]

Winkler H, Fisher-Colbrie R (1992) The chromogranins A and B: the first 25 years and future perspectives. Neuroscience 19:497-528

Zhou Y, Lindberg I (1993) Purification and characterization of the prohormone convertase PC1 (PC3). J Biol Chem 268:5615-5623[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhu X, Lindberg I (1995) 7B2 facilitates the maturation of proPC2 in neuroendocrine cells and is required for the expression of enzymatic activity. J Cell Biol 129:1641-1650[Abstract]

Zhou A, Mains RE (1994) Endoproteolytic processing of proopiomelanocortin and prohormone convertases 1 and 2 in neuroendocrine cells overexpressing prohormone convertases 1 or 2. J Biol Chem 269:17440-17447[Abstract/Free Full Text]