Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, Vol. 45, 1707-1714, Copyright © 1997 by The Histochemical Society, Inc.


TECHNICAL NOTE

Quantitative Comparison of Pretreatment Regimens Used to Sensitize In Situ Hybridization Using Oligonucleotide Probes on Paraffin-embedded Brain Tissue

Kevin R. Olivera, Robert P. Heavensa, and Dalip J. S. Sirinathsinghjia
a Merck, Sharp and Dohme Research Laboratories, Neuroscience Research Centre, Harlow, Essex, United Kingdom

Correspondence to: Kevin R. Oliver, Merck, Sharp and Dohme Res. Labs., Neurosci. Res. Centre, Terling’s Park, Eastwick Rd., Harlow, Essex CM20 2QR, UK.


  Summary
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Paraffin embedding of tissue is generally perceived to dramatically reduce RNA detectability. As a consequence, in situ hybridization on paraffin-embedded tissue is largely confined to detection of high-copy RNA species (e.g., viral RNA) and/or to detection using typically more sensitive cDNA probes or riboprobes. In this study, several procedures for in situ hybridization on paraffin-embedded rat tissue using oligonucleotide probes complementary to cellular transcripts were developed and quantitatively compared. Certain pretreatments showed marked increases in sensitivity compared to untreated sections. Furthermore, through quantitative assessment using image analysis, sensitivity of optimal pretreatments was equal to that of routinely used fresh-frozen, postfixed tissue sections. The development of such techniques permitting in situ hybridization to be carried out on paraffin-embedded tissue allows a comparison of protein and mRNA distribution to be made in adjacent sections and provides the potential for double labeling by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry which may not be possible on post-fixed frozen sections. (J Histochem Cytochem 45:1707-1713, 1997)

Key Words: in situ hybridization, oligonucleotide, image analysis, pretreatment, proenkephalin, rat brain


  Introduction
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Synthetic oligonucleotides are widely used in modern molecular biology and associated disciplines. One of their many uses is in in situ hybridization, which is increasingly being used to determine the localization of specific DNA and RNA sequences in tissue sections and cells. Oligonucleotide probes have an advantage over DNA probes and riboprobes in that they are easily and readily synthesized to known sequences, thereby avoiding homology with related sequences and consequently reducing background signal. Furthermore, they are small in size and can penetrate tissue easily. However, their primary disadvantage is that their small size and scope of labeling are limited, and sensitivity is therefore greatly reduced. In most instances in which the detection of cellular messenger RNA (mRNA) species is required, mRNA degradation must be minimized, which historically necessitated the use of rapidly removed, fresh-frozen, cryostat-cut tissue, which is postfixed and stored either as frozen (dry) sections or in 95% ethanol (Sirinathsinghji et al. 1995 ; Rigby et al. 1996 ) under RNase-free conditons. These protocols have inherent practical problems associated with storage and detrimental effects on tissue morphology brought about by freeze-thawing (Scopsi et al. 1992 ). The use of paraffin-embedded tissue for in situ hybridization has been typically confined to investigations of abundant RNA species, such as viral transcripts, more often than not using the more sensitive cDNA probes or riboprobes. Preservation of RNA species in tissue processed in this way is usually carried out using crosslinking fixatives, such as formaldehyde (Fox et al. 1985 ; Puchtler and Meloan 1985 ). Crosslinking itself prevents access of probes to the target molecule, and such sections must therefore be digested in one of many ways, typically using acids, detergents, and/or enzymes (e.g, proteinase K, pepsin, trypsin, or pronase). This step remains problematic, and the degree of RNA retrieval may be inconsistent because of the fixative type used and/or the duration of fixation before embedding. The primary advantage of paraffin-embedded tissue over postfixed frozen sections is that the cell morphology is far superior. This is demonstrated in the widespread use of paraffin-embedded tissue for immunohistochemistry, particularly in clinical pathology. Conditions under which medium- to low-abundance cellular mRNAs could be detected in paraffin-embedded tissue using oligonucleotide probes would allow adjacent sections to be analyzed by immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization techniques, and the potential for double labeling studies to be carried out on the same section. In this study, section pretreatments, some of which have been previously assessed in antigen retrieval studies for immunohistochemistry (Shi et al. 1991 , Shi et al. 1993 ; Umemura et al. 1995 ), have been adapted for use in in situ hybridization, and each has been quantitatively compared using image analysis. The target RNA was rat brain proenkephalin mRNA expression. Proenkephalin, an opioid precursor peptide, is expressed in many regions of the mammalian brain but predominantly in the caudate putamen (Yoshikawa et al. 1984 ; Harlan et al. 1987 ). The enkephalinergic medium-sized spiny neurons make a major projection to the globus pallidus (Cuello and Paxinos 1978 ; Correa et al. 1981 ; Del Faccio et al. 1982). The high proportion of cells expressing proenkephalin in the caudate putamen allows densitometric comparisons to be made relatively simply and accurately.


  Materials and Methods
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Preparation of Tissue
Male Sprague-Dawley rats of 230 g were terminally anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital and transcardially perfused with 500 ml 0.9% saline containing 25 U/ml heparin. Rats were subsequently perfused with the same volume of 10% formal saline. Brains were removed and stored in fixative for 72 hr before embedding in paraffin. Sagittal sections were then cut at 6 µm using a rotary microtome (Anglia Scientific; Cambridge, UK) and mounted on Fisher Superfrost/plus slides (BDH; Poole, UK). Sections were stored in dust-free conditions at room temperature (RT).

Slide Pretreatments
All slides were deparaffinized in xylene (15 min), hydrated in graded ethanols [prepared with diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC)-treated water], and washed twice in DEPC-treated water. From this stage, the treatments differed. For autoclaving, sections were placed in 10 mM citrate buffer, pH 6.0, and autoclaved in a standard 130C/2 bar/40 min cycle (Astell Scientific; Sidcup, UK). Sections were allowed to cool to 70C, washed for 15 min in DEPC-treated water, and dehydrated through graded ethanols. For microwaving, sections were also immersed in 10 mM citrate buffer, pH 6.0, in a clean polyethylene chamber, covered with a lid, and microwaved at full power in an 800-W microwave [Panasonic (Matsushita Electric); Uxbridge, UK] for three 5-min periods. After each 5-min period the solution was topped up to compensate for any evaporation. Likewise, sections were washed for 15 min in DEPC-treated water and dehydrated in graded ethanols. For simple heating, slides were placed in DEPC-treated water for 120 min at 90C, before dehydration in graded ethanols. For pretreatment with proteinase K, sections were treated sequentially with 0.2 M HCl (10 min), 1% Triton X-100 (90 sec), 8 µg/ml proteinase K (Boehringer; Mannheim, Germany) in 20 mM Tris, 2 mM CaCl2, pH 7.0 [for 20 min, 40 min, or 90 min, at 37C, based on optimal conditions as previously described (Oliver et al. 1997 )]. The digestion was subsequently stopped in PBS containing 2 mg/ml glycine and 5 mM EDTA before dehydration in graded ethanols.

For comparison, sections from fresh-frozen rat brains were probed for proenkephalin mRNA using a typical, well-characterized in situ hybridization protocol (Sirinathsinghji et al. 1995 ; Rigby et al. 1996 ). Briefly, the brains of rats were rapidly removed after decapitation and frozen in isopentane chilled to -40C. Sections were then cut in a cryo-stat (Reichert-Jung; Nussloch, Germany) at 10 µm and allowed to dry onto Fisher Superfrost/plus slides (BDH) before fixation in chilled 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.01 M PBS, pH 7.2 (5 min). Slides were then washed twice in PBS and processed through graded ethanols to 95% ethanol, in which they were stored at 4C until use, at which point they were removed from the ethanol and allowed to air-dry.

Design and Synthesis of Oligonucleotide Probes
An oligonucleotide probe complementary to nucleotides 388-432 of rat proenkephalin (Yoshikawa et al. 1984 ) was synthesized on an Applied Biosystems DNA synthesizer (model 394; Perkin Elmer, Foster City, CA) and purified by 8 M urea/8 M polyacrylamide preparative sequencing gel electrophoresis.

In Situ Hybridization
The oligonucleotide probe was labeled in a reaction mixture containing 0.4 pmol oligonucleotide, 1 x reaction buffer (Boehringer), 2.5 mM cobalt chloride, 25 U terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT; Boehringer), and 19 µCi [35S]-deoxyadenosine 5'({alpha}-thiotriphosphate) (NEN; Hounslow, UK). Specific activity was 1250 Ci/mmol (12.5 mCi/ml) for 15 min at 37C. On cessation of the labeling reaction, dithiothreitol was added to a final concentration of 40 mM. The radiolabeled probe was subsequently purified from unincorporated nucleotides using Sephadex G-50 spin columns. Hybridization was carried out as described previously (Sirinathsinghji et al. 1995 ; Rigby et al. 1996 ). Briefly, 3 x 105 cpm of 35S-labeled probe in 100 µl of hybridization buffer [50% deionized formamide, 4 x standard saline citrate (SSC), 5x Denhardt's, 200 µg/ml acid-alkali-cleaved salmon sperm DNA, 100 µg/ml long-chain polyadenylic acid, 25 mM sodium phosphate, 10% dextran sulfate, and 40 mM dithiothreitol] was placed on each slide and coverslipped with a Parafilm (Sigma; Poole, UK) coverslip. Hybridization was carried out overnight in a humid environment at 37C. To define nonspecific hybridization, adjacent sections were incubated in either labeled sense probe or a mixture of labeled anti-sense probe with excess (100 x) unlabeled anti-sense probe. As a further control, the sense probe was also assessed using excess unlabeled sense probe. After hybridization, the sections were washed for 1 hr in 1 x SSC (containing 1% sodium thiosulfate) at 55C, followed by 1 hr in the same buffer at RT. Slides were then rinsed in 0.1 x SSC, dehydrated in graded ethanols, air-dried, and exposed to Hyperfilm ßmax (Amersham; Little Chalfont, UK) for 48 hr.

For qualitative histological assessment of the effect of the various pretreatments on tissue morphology, sections that had undergone in situ hybridization after the pretreatment procedures outlined above were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and examined under a Leitz DMRD microscope (Leica; Nussloch, Germany).

Evaluation of In Situ Hybridization Results
The sensitivity of the pretreatments was calculated by densitometric analysis of in situ hybridization signal on autoradiographs. All hybridizations of all sections were carried out using the same probe mixture and same washes at the same time to ensure optimal comparability. Furthermore, reference standards were used to allow interfilm comparison where required. Image analysis was carried out using a MCID computerized image analysis system (Imaging Research; St Catharines, Ontario, Canada).

Quantitative analysis was carried out on at least three sections from each brain. The hybridization signals of the sections were correlated to a standard curve obtained from exposing a series of radioactive 35S standards (obtained by serial dilution of an aliquot of the 35S-labeled proenkephalin probe) to the same film as the sections. The optical density measurements of the standards (and therefore the sections) were translated into absolute amounts of radioactive nucleotide and proenkephalin mRNA detected in attomol/mm2.


  Results
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Effect of Pretreatment Regimens on Sensitization of In Situ Hybridization Signal
In situ hybridization signal for proenkephalin was observed predominantly in the caudate putamen (Figure 1), as previously described (Harlan et al. 1987 ; Beckstead 1995 ). Densitometric data are displayed in Figure 1 and Figure 2. The in situ signal in postfixed frozen sections and paraffin sections pretreated by microwaving for 15 min in citrate buffer were the most intense of all sections tested. There was no significant difference between these two groups (Figure 1A, Figure 1D, and Figure 2). A lower amount of signal was observed in all other paraffin-embedded sections, irrespective of pretreatment. The optimal pretreatment in terms of sensitization was microwaving for 15 min in citrate buffer, and proteinase K digestion for 20 minutes was the second most effective (Figure 1G). There was little difference in terms of intensity between sections that had undergone proteolytic digestion for 20 min and those that had undergone 40 min (Figure 1H), but considerable difference was observed in those digested for 90 min (Figure 1I). No positive signal for proenkephalin in the brain was detectable over background in sections subjected to 90 min of proteinase K digestion. Only weak signal was observed after autoclaving of paraffin sections (Figure 1E). The least sensitive method of pretreatment [second to not pretreating paraffin-embedded sections at all (Figure 1C) or using the harsh treatments of autoclaving or proteinase K digestion for 90 min] was that of heating the sections in water at 90C (Figure 1F). Only weak signal was detectable, with little difference noted between this group and those autoclaved (see Figure 2). All control sections probed with a mixture of anti-sense probe and 100 x excess of unlabeled anti-sense probe (Figure 1B), those probed with sense probe, or with sense probe with 100 x excess unlabeled sense probe gave results not significantly higher than background.



View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Sensitivity of various in situ hybridization retrieval methods as shown by computer generated images. (A) Whole rat brain sagittal section (frozen, postfixed) showing intense proenkephalin in situ hybridization signal in caudate putamen (CPu; Cb, cerebellum). No signal was detected in sections probed with a mixture of 100 x excess unlabeled anti-sense probe (B) or in paraffin sections that received no pretreatment. (C) Brain sections after pretreatments are shown. (D) Fifteen-min microwaving in citrate buffer; (E) autoclaving in citrate buffer; (F) 120 min in distilled water at 90C; (G) 20-min proteinase K digestion; (H) 40-min proteinase K digestion; (I) 90-min proteinase K digestion. Calibration bar = attomols/mm2. Scale bar = 5 mm.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Graph illustrating comparison of pretreatments. All data were obtained from the same autoradiographic film, using sections from one individual animal, probed using the same probe and washed in the same wash solutions to ensure optimal comparability. Data were consistently reproducible when pretreatments were repeated on series of sections from different animals. Note that there is no difference between the frozen postfixed sections and the paraffin sections that were pretreated by microwaving. Sections treated by autoclaving and 120 min in distilled water at 90C (90 C) gave less intense retrieval and gave similar results. Proteinase K treatment for 20 (PK20) or 40 (PK40) min were also indistinguishable from one another. Sections pretreated with 90-min proteinase K digestion (PK90), those not pretreated with any retrieval conditions (NONE), and those probed with a mixture of labeled and 100 x excess unlabeled anti-sense probe (COLD) were all comparable and were visually indistinguishable from background (see Figure 1). Data are mean ± SEM; n = 6 (FROZEN and COLD groups) or n = 3 (all other groups).

Effect of Pretreatment Regimens on Tissue Morphology
Histological assessment was carried out on hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections that had undergone in situ hybridization for proenkephalin. Sections that had not undergone any pretreatment apart from basic deparaffinization and dehydration were regarded as the benchmark and showed characteristically intense hematoxylin staining primarily of chromatin and, to a lesser extent, the somal cytoplasm, with glial cells (e.g., oligodendrocytes and astrocytes) staining more intensely. Eosin stained the cytoplasm and myelin of white matter tracts, the latter being the most intense (Figure 3A). Sections pretreated with microwaving, heating at 90C or proteinase K treatment for 20 min had negligible effects on cell morphology (Figure 3B, Figure 3E, and Figure 3F). Chromatin structure was marginally impaired compared to controls in sections pretreated for 40 min in proteinase K but was still perfectly acceptable (Figure 3C). Very poor preservation of cell morphology was observed in sections pretreated by autoclaving or 90 min of proteinase K digestion (Figure 3D, and Figure 3G). Sections that had been autoclaved showed minimal eosin staining of the neuropil, although strong white matter fiber staining was preserved. All neuronal nuclei appeared to have disappeared from the section, although some glial nuclei remained, often in a damaged state. In some cases, the nucleoli appeared to be spared and occupied the appropriate position in the void in which the nucleus had been (Figure 3G). Sections that had been digested for 90 min in proteinase K also demonstrated absence of eosin staining in the neuropil, leaving strong eosin-stained white matter fibers (Figure 3D). Cytoplasmic hematoxylin staining was also affected and gave cells the appearance of homogenous blue nuclei in which the nuclear chromatin structure was poorly preserved (Figure 3G). The nucleoli in some cells were still apparent. Frozen postfixed sections had relatively poor morphology compared to all paraffin sections except those pretreated with 90 min of proteinase K or autoclaving (Figure 3H). Hematoxylin staining of the nucleus was very intense, and it was difficult to distinguish neurons from glia. Chromatin structure was indistinguishable. Eosin staining overall was relatively weak, and was marginally stronger in the white matter tracts. Individual fibers were much less clearly distinguishable than in any of the paraffin sections, even those subjected to severe pretreatments, such as autoclaving.



View larger version (141K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effect on cell morphology of various pretreatments. (A) No pretreatment; (B) 20-min proteinase K digestion; (C) 40-min proteinase K digestion; (D) 90-min proteinase K digestion; (E) 120-min in distilled water at 90C; (F) 15-min microwaving in citrate buffer; (G) autoclaved in citrate buffer; (H) frozen postfixed tissue. Note detrimental effect of 90-min proteinase K digestion and autoclaving on tissue morphology, and poor morphology observed in frozen postfixed tissue. Sections counterstained with hematoxylin and eosin. Bar = 20 µm.


  Discussion
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

In this study we have compared an array of pretreatment regimens using quantitative densitometric techniques to determine the optimal conditions for sensitization of in situ hybridization signal on paraffin-embedded brain sections. Many methods have been documented for retrieving antigenicity in archival paraffin sections (Shi et al. 1991 , Shi et al. 1993 ; Umemura et al. 1995 ) and for staining of cells positive for TdT-mediated end-labeling (TUNEL) (Strater et al. 1995 ), but no comparative analysis has previously been made with regard to sensitivity for in situ hybridization using oligonucleotide probes in brain tissue.

It is generally believed that the greatest hybridization signal is achieved using fresh tissue, cut frozen and lightly postfixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. In this study we achieved a high degree of sensitivity using this method, although the signal intensity in paraffin sections pretreated by microwaving was equally high. Assuming that the oligonucleotide probe is small enough to penetrate into the depth of the section completely and that all ß-particles reach the overlying film, it can be concluded that microwave pretreatment of paraffin tissue allows more sensitive detection of mRNA than in fresh tissue, because in this experiment we have compared routinely used 10-µm frozen postfixed sections with 6-µm paraffin sections. The reasons for enhanced sensitivity may involve several factors. First, microwaving may allow greater penetration of the probe because of its ability to disrupt crosslinked proteins formed as a result of formaldehyde fixation (Fox et al. 1985 ; Puchtler and Meloan 1985 ; Morgan et al. 1994 ). These bonds may exist even in the lightly postfixed frozen tissue, thereby inhibiting probe penetration. A second possibility is that when the rats are perfused with fixative before brain removal and paraffin embedding, there may be less chance of RNase-mediated mRNA degradation than in animals decapitated before fresh tissue removal, owing to instantaneous RNase inhibition. The greater sensitivity of in situ hybridization after microwaving than after proteinase K treatment for 20 min was demonstrated by stronger signal (Figure 2). Interestingly, 40 min of proteolytic digestion had no major effect on signal intensity compared to 20-min digestion. However, increasing digestion time to 90 min caused a total loss of signal, presumably because of decreased retention of the target mRNA through digestion of crosslinked cellular components that maintain intracellular morphology. The reverse situation was observed in paraffin sections that received no pretreatment (apart from deparaffinization), in which no specific signal was observed. This was presumably due to lack of permeabilization. Weak signal was observed in sections pretreated with heating in distilled water at 90C for 120 min. This combination of soaking solution, temperature, and duration of incubation was an optimal combination for the retrieval of bcl-2 immunoreactivity (Umemura et al. 1995 ). However, only weak in situ signal was evident in this group, suggesting that although this pretreatment may be suitable for bcl-2 immunostaining, it is unsuitable for mRNA retrieval. It has been observed by others that for antigen retrieval to take place, the buffer must have an ionic content, e.g., as in citrate buffer (Shi et al. 1991 ; Morgan et al. 1994 ).

Although the microwave procedure appears to optimally sensitize the in situ signal, these data must be discussed in the light of the morphological analysis if sections are to be examined by light microscopy in addition to preliminary autoradiographic analysis. It was clear from the hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections that optimal cell morphology was maintained in sections heated at 90C in distilled water or those pretreated with 20 min of proteinase K digestion. However, these had significantly weaker signal intensities than those microwaved. Ultimately to decide on which protocol to use would depend on the absolute need of optimal morphology combined with estimated quantity of target RNA. In most circumstances, the use of the microwaving conditions outlined in this study would be entirely satisfactory. This would have the clear advantage of also allowing the potential for double labeling by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization on adjacent sections or on the same section, because microwaving in these conditions has been used by ourselves and others to retrieve antigenicity (Shi et al. 1991 , Shi et al. 1993 ). Furthermore, it has recently been shown that microwaving with these conditions is able to sensitize in situ signal using cRNA probes in many different tissues without the need to vary duration of permeabilization incubations according to tissue type, which is often required when proteolytic methods are used (Sibony et al. 1995 ; Lan et al. 1996 ).

We conclude that after suitable pretreatment, such as microwaving for 15 min in citrate buffer, RNA detectability by in situ hybridization is greatly enhanced, to a greater degree than in frozen postfixed sections. This method has many advantages, including preservation of superior morphology, enhanced potential for double labeling, and more convenient and stable storage characteristics with increased longevity.


  Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Ms A. Jennings for technical assistance and to Dr M. Rigby for expertise in image analysis.

Received for publication February 11, 1997; accepted June 19, 1997.


  Literature Cited
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Beckstead RM (1995) N-methyl-D-aspartate acutely increases proenkephalin mRNA in the rat striatum. Synapse 21:342-347 [Medline]

Correa FMA, Innis RB, Hester LD, Snyder SH (1981) Diffuse enkephalin innervation from caudate to globus pallidus. Neurosci Lett 25:63-68 [Medline]

Cuello AC, Paxinos G (1978) Evidence for a long Leu-enkephalin striopallidal pathway in rat brain. Nature 271:178-180 [Medline]

Del Fiacco M, Paxinos G, Cuello AC (1982) Neostriatal enkephalin-immunoreactive neurons project to the globus pallidus. Brain Res 231:1-17 [Medline]

Fox CH, Johnson FB, Whiting J, Roller PP (1985) Formaldehyde fixation. J Histochem Cytochem 33:845-853 [Medline]

Harlan RE, Shivers BD, Romano GJ, Howells RD, Pfaff DW (1987) Localisation of preproenkephalin mRNA in the rat brain and spinal cord by in situ hybridization. J Comp Neurol 258:159-184 [Medline]

Lan HY, Mu W, Ng YY, Nikolic-Paterson DJ, Atkins RC (1996) A simple, reliable, and sensitive method for nonradioactive in situ hybridization: use of microwave heating to improve hybridization efficiency and preserve tissue morphology. J Histochem Cytochem 44:281-287 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Morgan JM, Navabi H, Schmid KW, Jasani B (1994) Possible role of tissue-bound calcium ions in citrate-mediated high-temperature antigen retrieval. J Pathol 174:301-307 [Medline]

Oliver KR, Scallan MF, Dyson H, Fazakerley JK (1997) Susceptibility to a neurotropic virus and its changing distribution in the developing brain is a function of CNS maturity. J Neurovirol 3:38-48 [Medline]

Puchtler H, Meloan SN (1985) On the chemistry of formaldehyde fixation and its effects on immunohistochemical reactions. Histochemistry 82:201-204 [Medline]

Rigby M, Le Bourdelles B, Heavens RP, Kelly S, Smith D, Butler A, Hammans R, Hills R, Xuereb JH, Hill RG, Whiting PJ, Sirinathsinghji DJS (1996) The messenger RNAs for the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunits show region specific expression of different subunit composition in the human brain. Neuroscience 73:429-447 [Medline]

Scopsi L, Migliari M, Vergani B, Lombardi L (1992) The use of fixed-frozen tissue in routine ultrastructural evaluation and immunogold labeling. Ultrastruct Pathol 16:351-362 [Medline]

Shi S-R, Chaiwun B, Young L, Cote RJ, Taylor CR (1993) Antigen retrieval technique utilizing citrate buffer or urea solution for immunohistochemical demonstration of androgen receptor in formalin-fixed, paraffin sections. J Histochem Cytochem 41:1599-1604 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shi S-R, Key ME, Kalra KL (1991) Antigen retrieval in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tisues: an enhancement method for immunohistochemical staining based on microwave oven heating of tissue section. J Histochem Cytochem 39:741-748 [Abstract]

Sibony M, Commo F, Callard P, Gasc JM (1995) Enhancement of mRNA in situ hybridization signal by microwave heating. Lab Invest 73:586-591 [Medline]

Sirinathsinghji DJS, Rigby M, Heavens RP, Smith D, Fernandez JM, Schuligoi R, Hill RG (1995) Increased messenger RNA expression of the 695 and 751 amino acid isoforms of the ß-amyloid protein precursor in the thalamus of 17 year old cynomolgus (Macaca fascicularis) monkeys. Neuroscience 65:51-57 [Medline]

Strater J, Gunthert AR, Bruderlein S, Moller P (1995) Microwave irradiation of paraffin-embedded tissue sensitizes the TUNEL method for in situ detection of apoptotic cells. Histochemistry 103:157-160 [Medline]

Umemura S, Kawai K, Osamura RY, Tsutsumi Y (1995) Antigen retrieval for bcl-2 protein in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections. Pathol Int 45:103-107 [Medline]

Yoshikawa K, Williams C, Sabol SL (1984) Rat brain preproenkephalin mRNA. J Biol Chem 259:14301-14308 [Abstract/Free Full Text]