Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, Vol. 46, 613-626, May 1998, Copyright © 1998, The Histochemical Society, Inc.
Stem Cells and Rat Liver Carcinogenesis: Contributions of Confocal and Electron Microscopy
Phyllis M. Novikoffa and
Ana Yama
a Department of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
Correspondence to:
Phyllis M. Novikoff, Dept. of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave. U423, Bronx, NY 10461.
 |
Summary |
---|
Microscopic analysis in combination with cytochemistry and immunocytochemistry has revealed the presence of four cell types not previously described in the portal area and parenchyma of the liver from an experimental rodent hepatocarcinogenic rat model. Within the intrahepatic bile ductules, which proliferate after administration of chemical carcinogens and partial hepatectomy, small, undifferentiated nonpolarized, nonepithelial cells with a blast-like phenotype and polarized epithelial cells different from the polarized epithelial cells that typically line the walls of the bile ductules were found. In the connective tissue stroma surrounding the bile ductules, nonpolarized epithelial cells with hepatocyte phenotype were found. In the parenchyma, subpopulations of bile ductule epithelial cells that established ATPase-positive bile canalicular structures, including the formation of desmosomes and tight junctions, with parenchymal hepatocytes within the hepatic lobule were found. These observations raise the following questions in this model. Are there undifferentiated progenitor cells with stem cell-like properties within bile ductules? What are the interrelations of the newly described cell types with each other, with parenchymal hepatocytes, with preneoplastic nodules, and with hepatomas? Do the heterogeneous cell types within the bile ductules, in the surrounding connective tissue, and within the hepatic cords represent intermediate stages of single or multiple cell lineage pathways leading to hepatocyte differentiation, liver regeneration, and/or preneoplastic nodule formation? (J Histochem Cytochem 46:613626, 1998)
Key Words:
, progenitor cells, oval cells, bile ductules, hepatocytes, ATPase, preneoplastic nodules, peroxisomes, bile canaliculi, desmosomes, cell polarity
 |
Introduction |
---|
STEM CELLS are known to exist in rapidly proliferating adult tissues, such as bone marrow, intestine, and skin (Cheng and LeBlond 1974; Cotsarelis et al. 1990
; Heimmann and Weissmann 1991). The liver, which has the capacity to regenerate, was not considered to have a stem-cell compartment. However, experiments in mice in which hepatocytes were destroyed by toxins or in rats in which carcinogens inhibited hepatocyte replication gave impetus to the hypothesis that a facultative stem cell is present in the liver (Wilson and Leduc 1958
; Fausto 1990
; Sigal et al. 1992
; Sell 1993
; Thorgeirsson 1995
; Bisgaard et al. 1996
). The identity of hepatic stem cells and their location have not been unequivocally established. However, studies in mice with excessive liver loss and in rats in which hepatocyte regeneration is prevented by carcinogens suggested that proliferating nonparenchymal epithelial cells, termed oval cells, located in the duct of Hering segment of the bile ductules and/or periductule cells located in the connective tissue stroma surrounding the bile ductules represented the putative stem cell compartment (Wilson and Leduc 1958
; Lombardi 1982
; Sell 1984; Evarts et al. 1987
; Dunsford et al. 1989
). Our previous studies in a rat carcinogenic model in which hepatocyte replication is inhibited and in which preneoplastic nodules are formed (Solt et al. 1977
) revealed the presence of two other cell populations within the bile ductule system, undifferentiated cells with a blast-like phenotype and polarized transitional cells with a hepatocyte phenotype (Novikoff et al. 1996b
). These studies suggested that the ductal blast-like cells may represent liver multipotential progenitor cells with stem cell-like properties and that the ductal transitional cells may represent intermediate stages in the differentiation of ductal cells into parenchymal hepatocytes and/or preneoplastic nodules.
We report here additional studies on the portal region of rat liver after a carcinogenic protocol. We substantiate and extend our earlier findings that during the early stages of liver carcinogenesis a greater diversity of cell types is present within the proliferating bile ductule system, the connective tissue stroma surrounding the ductules, and the hepatic parenchyma. Our new studies demonstrate that the blast-like cells in the basal region of the bile ductules acquire the properties characteristic of bile ductule epithelial cell populations, parenchymal hepatocytes, and preneoplastic nodular cells. The ductal blast-like cells replicate and undergo a differentiation program that involves the development of polarity and specialized plasma membrane properties, including the formation of desmosomes, tight junctions, and apical microvilli. We also describe other cell types that have not been previously seen in this model, including the following: polarized transitional cells that have catalase-positive peroxisomes which migrate out of the bile ductule structures: nonpolarized hepatocyte-like cells in the connective tissue stroma; and subpopulations of polarized bile ductule epithelial cells that integrate within the hepatic cords. This latter cell type is in direct contact with parenchymal hepatocytes and forms ATPase-positive bile canalicular structures as well as desmosomes and tight junctions with hepatocytes. These studies suggested that the ductal blast-like cells may have multipotential stem cell-like properties and that diverse and multiple cell lineage pathways may be involved in hepatocyte differentiation, liver regeneration, and preneoplastic nodule formation.
 |
Materials and Methods |
---|
Animals
Male Fisher 344 rats weighing 120130 g were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA) and maintained in a central animal facility with a 12-hr light/dark cycle for 1 week before treatment with a carcinogen and partial hepatectomy protocol (Solt et al. 1977
; Faris et al. 1991
). The protocol was administered to 10 rats. It consists of the following: a single IP injection of diethynitrosamine (DEN) (200 mg/kg; Sigma Chemical, St Louis, MO); 2 weeks after the injection, one pellet containing acethyaminofluorene (AAF) designed to release a total of 35 mg of AAF over a 2-week period (Innovative Research of America; Miami, FL) was placed SC at the back of the neck; two thirds partial hepatectomy (PH) (Higgins and Anderson 1931
) was performed 1 week after AAF exposure under anesthesia. Two to three days after PH, liver tissue was removed from rats under ether anesthesia and processed for the morphological studies described below. Illustrations are from liver tissue 23 days after the PH step of the protocol. Control animals included rats not treated with carcinogens and partial hepatectomy and rats subjected only to partial hepatectomy. The animal care facility is under the supervision of veterinarians who follow federal guidelines. All procedures were approved by the Albert Einstein College of Medicine Animal Care Committee.
Tissue Fixation
Liver slices (23 mm thick) were removed from the rats and fixed in the following fixatives by immersion: (a) cold 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.4, for 3 hr with shaking; (b) a cold mixture of 4% paraformaldehyde/2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4, for 3 hr with shaking (Karnovsky 1965
); (c) 4% osmium tetroxide, pH 7.4, for 1 hr after above Fixative a or b. Liver slices fixed in Fixatives a or b were cryoprotected by infusion with increasing concentrations of cold sucrose before sectioning.
Tissue Sectioning
Liver sections were prepared as follows: (a) aldehyde-fixed frozen sections (1020 µm) with a Sartorius freezing microtome (Leitz; Gottingen, Germany); (b) aldehyde-fixed nonfrozen sections (1530 µm) using a Lancer vibratome, Series 1000 (Polysciences; Warrington, PA); (c) 1-µm and 5080-nm Epon-embedded sections using an LKB ultramicrotome II (LKB; Stockholm, Sweden).
Enzyme Cytochemistry
Free-floating aldehyde-fixed (Fixative b, above) frozen and nonfrozen sections were incubated for the following enzymes: (a) catalase activity in peroxisomes and microperoxisomes, using a medium containing 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB-HCl) (Sigma) as substrate at pH 9.7 (Novikoff et al. 1977
) at 37C for 3045 min; (b) adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) activity in bile canaliculi using as substrate sodium salt of adenosine triphosphate at pH 7.4 at 37C for 3045 min (Wachstein and Meisel 1957
); (c) endogenous or exogenous peroxidase activity using a medium containing DAB-HCl, pH 7.4, at room temperature (RT) for 1520 min (Graham and Karnovsky 1966
). Controls for each enzyme included incubation in medium without substrate.
Immunocytochemistry
Free-floating aldehyde-fixed (Fixative a, above) frozen and nonfrozen sections were exposed to the following antibodies overnight at 0C: (a) cytokeratin 19 monoclonal antibody (Amersham; Arlington Heights, IL); (b) rabbit polyclonal anti-rat glutathione-S-transferase Yp (Biotrin International; Dublin, Ireland). Either a peroxidase-labeled second antibody method or a fluorescent-labeled (Cy 3 or Cy 5) second antibody method (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories; West Grove, PA) was employed to detect primary antibodies. Pretreatment of sections to inhibit endogenous peroxidase (with hydrogen peroxide; Sigma), inhibit background fluorescence (with sodium borohydride; Sigma), prevent nonspecific binding of primary antigens (with goat serum, bovine serum albumin; Sigma), and enhance immunoreagent penetration into tissue (Triton X-100, Tween; Sigma) were performed as previously described (Novikoff et al. 1991
, Novikoff et al. 1996a
, Novikoff et al. 1996b
). Controls included exposure to all reagents except primary antibodies. Sections were also exposed to fluorescein (FITC)-labeled phalloidin (Molecular Probes; Eugene, OR) (1:20 dilution of stock solution (300 U/1.5 ml of cold methanol) for 60 min RT to detect actin filaments and to propidium iodide (Molecular Probes) (1 mg/50 ml of PBS) for 5 min at RT to detect nuclear and cytoplasmic nucleic acids. Sections were also sequentially stained for the co-localization of cytokeratin 19 using Cy 5-labeled second antibody, FITCphalloidin, and propidium iodide.
Microscopy
Fluorescent-labeled liver sections were examined with an inverted Nikon fluorescent microscope using a x60 oil immersion lens with numerical aperture 1.4 Planapo objective. The microscope was attached to the Bio-Rad MRC 600 confocal laser imaging system (Bio-Rad Laboratories; Hercules, CA) equipped with a krypton/argon laser. Black level, gain and laser intensity, Kalman averaging, excitation intensity, pinhole aperture, and Z-series analysis of sections were performed as previously described (Novikoff et al. 1996a
). Enzyme cytochemically labeled liver sections were examined and photographed with a Zeiss Ultraphot II (Carl Zeiss; Thornwood, NY). Ultrathin Epon-embedded sections were examined with a Philips EM 300 equipped with a goniometer stage (Philips Electronic Optics; Millersville, MD).
 |
Results |
---|
Confocal Microscopic Observations
Nonpolarized and Polarized Bile Ductule Cells.
Earlier light microscopic studies of sections of liver from rats treated with AAFDEN 23 days post PH revealed the presence of small cells situated at the base of the ductules underneath the bile ductule epithelium (Novikoff et al. 1996b
). The small basal cells did not appear to be in contact with the lumen of the ductule, suggesting that the small basal cells were not polarized. To determine whether the small basal cells had contact with the ductule lumen and whether these cells possessed a polarity similar to that of bile ductule epithelial cells, we performed confocal microscopic analysis of the basal cells. We used fluorescent-labeled phallodin to label the luminal aspect of the ductule cells and propidium iodide to label nuclei. Figure 1a and inset illustrate the presence of small basal cells located beneath bile ductule epithelial cells. Actin staining (green) is evident at the luminal surface of all the cells that comprise the bile ductule except the small basal cells. The small basal cells appear to have a spherical nucleus, a clear zone around them, do not have actin localized on any of their surfaces, and are beneath bile ductule epithelial cells that have actin on the apical surface in contact with the ductule lumen. Laser scanning of the liver sections through their entire depth at intervals of 0.5 µm revealed that actin staining was not detected at any level of the small basal cells whereas actin staining was present at all levels of the bile ductule epithelial cells that line the ductule (see Figure 2 in Novikoff et al. 1996b
). Figure 1a, inset, illustrates the properties of the small basal cells within the ductules more clearly and also shows that ductule cells with this phenotype are not evident in the surrounding connective tissue stroma. Confocal microscopy therefore established that the basal cells were not in contact with the lumen and were not polarized like the bile ductule epithelial cells. Previous confocal analysis studies also showed that the basal cells did not express epithelial markers or lymphocyte markers (Novikoff et al. 1996b
). Figure 1b and Figure 1c show the tri-localization of actin, a polarization marker, of cytokeratin 19, a bile ductule epithelial marker, and of propidium iodide, a nuclear marker. Actin (yellow) is present at the luminal surface of the bile ductule epithelial cells and in bile canaliculi of contiguous hepatocytes (green). Cytokeratin 19-positive bile ductule cells (red) extend from the portal triad area into the hepatic parenchyma (Figure 1b). Single and groups of cytokeratin 19-positive cells are found within the hepatic cords interspersed between hepatocytes (Figure 1c). One of the cytokeratin 19-positive bile ductule cells exhibits an elongated profile and shows actin staining on two regions of its surface, one region in contact with the ductule lumen and the other in contact with a bile canaliculus of a parenchymal hepatocyte (Figure 1b). The nucleus of this elongated ductule cell is a considerable distance from the luminal surface. This ductule cell has changed its normal apicalbasal polarity and has formed two surfaces that are actin-positive. Figure 1c reveals that a subpopulation of cytokeratin-19-positive bile ductule cells integrate within the hepatic lobule and form bile canalicular structures, as determined by actin localization. These bile ductule cells do not appear to be attached to other bile ductule cells or to have a surface exposed to the ductule lumen, as illustrated in Figure 1b. Previous ultrastructural studies in a different carcinogenic rat model have shown that where bile ductule cells and hepatocytes contact, bile canalicular structures with characteristic microvilli, tight junctions, and desmosomes are formed. The newly formed bile canaliculi demonstrate activity of ATPase, an ectoenzyme present in normal hepatocyte bile canaliculi (Novikoff et al. 1991
; Hixson et al. 1992
), whereas the microvilli of the bile ductule cell facing the ductule lumen do not express ATPase activity. In the DEN-AF-PH rat model, we have also found a subpopulation of bile ductule cells in contact with parenchymal hepatocytes. Figure 2a illustrates the formation of a bile canaliculus that expresses ATPase activity between a bile ductule cell and a hepatocyte. The ductule cell in contact with the hepatocyte is also in contact with the ductule lumen. No ATPase activity is associated with the ductule lumen plasma membrane. Microvilli are present on the plasma membrane bordering the ductule lumen and the plasma membrane of the bile canaliculus. These ultrastructural studies confirm the confocal microscopic observations (Figure 1b) that there are subpopulations of bile ductule cells with two luminal surfaces. Basal lamina is seen surrounding the bile ductule cells except for the bile ductule cell that is in contact with hepatocytes.

View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Confocal microscopic images of liver sections from a rat treated with DEN-AAF-PH 3-day protocol. (a and inset) Co-localization of actin (green) and propidium iodide (red). Actin is distributed at the apical surface (facing the lumen) of the bile ductule epithelial cells. Arrows indicate small basal cells within the bile ductules. The small basal cells do not show actin on their apical surface, are not in contact with the lumen, and are enveloped by bile ductule epithelial cells. The nucleus of the basal cell appears spherical. Note that branches of the bile ductule extend into the hepatic parenchyma. Actin is also localized in bile canaliculi of hepatocytes. (Inset) Cross-section of another bile ductule reveals a basal cell that does not have actin on its surface and is not in contact with the lumen. (b,c) Co-localization of actin (yellow, green), cytokeratin-19 (red), and propidium iodide (blue). Arrow in b indicates an elongated cytokeratin-19-positive bile ductule cell that shows actin localization at the ductule lumen (yellow) and at a bile canalicular structure (green) formed between the bile ductule cell and a hepatocyte. Arrows in c show actin-positive bile canalicular structures (green) that have formed between a subpopulation of cytokeratin-19-positive bile ductule cells (red) and parenchymal hepatocytes. The cytokeratin-19-positive cells appear integrated within the hepatic cork.
|
|

View larger version (175K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
(a) Localization of ATPase activity in a section of rat liver. A bile ductule is evident within the liver lobule. Arrow indicates an ATPase-positive bile canaliculus that has formed between a bile ductule cell (D) and a hepatocyte (H). The bile ductule cell (D) in contact with the hepatocyte (H) retains its exposure to the ductule lumen (L). There is no demonstrable ATPase activity in the ductule lumen and basal lamina is not present where the bile ductule cell and the hepatocyte contact. Bar = 5 µm. (b) Localization of glutathione-S-transferase Yp antigen in a section of rat liver, counterstained with hematoxylin. The arrow shows GST-positive bile ductule cells interspersed between parenchymal hepatocytes. Two of the GST-positive cells are in mitosis (arrowhead). None of the parenchymal hepatocytes expresses GST activity. Bar = 50 µm. (c) Nine consecutive pairs of confocal microscopic images of a liver section stained for actin (left) and propidium iodide (right) . Arrows in the center pair of images show three basal cells in a bile ductule, two of which are in mitosis (black arrows) and one not in mitosis (white arrow). The chromosomes of the dividing basal cells are more distinct as the section is scanned deeper into the section.
|
|
Bile Ductule-derived Cells Integrate and Proliferate into the Hepatic Cord.
Confocal microscopic analysis also revealed the presence of subpopulations of bile ductule epithelial cells that appeared to be integrated within the hepatic cord. Single or multiple contiguous cytokeratin 19-positive cells are in contact with hepatocytes within the hepatic cords and form actin-positive bile canalicular structures (Figure 1c). One of the cytokeratin-19-positive cells is in mitosis, suggesting that replication of these cells occurs within the hepatic lobule. We also found GST-Yp-positive cells integrated within the hepatic cord, some of which are in mitosis (Figure 2b). These cells are also cytokeratin-19-positive, suggesting that they have a bile ductule phenotype. None of the parenchymal hepatocytes in Figure 2b expresses GST-Yp. We do not know the cell lineage relations between the bile ductule cells with the dual phenotype, i.e., both hepatocyte and bile ductule properties (Figure 1b and Figure 2a) that are part of the ductule, and the cytokeratin-19-positive and GST-Yp-positive bile ductule cells (Figure 1c and Figure 2b) that appear not to be part of the ductule but appear to be integrated within the hepatic cord and have formed actin-positive bile canaliculi with parenchymal hepatocytes. Whether these cells belong to the same cell lineage pathway or represent different subpopulations of bile ductule cells that are in the process of differentiating along separate cell lineage pathways remains to be determined. However, at this stage of their differentiation, we have only determined that they have acquired one hepatocyte phenotype, i.e., the formation of bile canaliculi.
Mitotic Images of Basal Cells Within Bile Ductiles.
Previous studies showed that the basal cells express proliferating cell nuclear antigen and showed basal cells in mitosis, indicating that the basal cells have the capacity to proliferate (Novikoff et al. 1996b
). We have encountered additional basal cells in mitosis within bile ductules by performing laser scanning of the liver sections. Figure 2c illustrates a scanned image of a liver section showing a bile ductule region stained for actin and propidium iodide. In the initial scan, basal cells were not evident. However, by performing a Z-series analysis, we detected two basal cells in mitosis at the basal aspect of the ductule as well as a nonmitotic basal cell. This scanned image also shows that the basal cells do not express actin on their apical sufaces at any level of the section, confirming the observation that the basal cells are not polarized.
Electron Microscopy
Heterogeneity of Cell Phenotypes Within Bile Ductules.
Light microscopic studies of the livers of mice suggested that the duct of Hering, a specialized region of bile ductule cells contiguous with parenchymal hepatocytes, was the site of a stem-cell compartment because when toxins were used to destroy hepatocytes, bile ductule cells proliferated and differentiation of bile ductule cells into cells with hepatocyte phenotype was observed (Wilson and Leduc 1958
). These observations led us to study the portal region of hepatocytes in the AAF-DEN-PH liver carcinogenic model to determine whether a stem-cell compartment is also present in this model. Ultrastructural analysis of regions of bile ductules analogous to the duct of Hering and in the connective tissue stroma surrounding the bile ductules revealed cell phenotypes not previously described (Figure 3ad). We found that the cell phenotypes within the bile ductule are heterogeneous and include polarized epithelial cells (Figure 3ad), some of which contain catalase-positive peroxisomes (Figure 3b and Figure 3c) and small, less-differentiated cells (Figure 3a) at the base of the ductule that correspond to the basal cells we observed with the confocal microscope (Figure 1a, Figure 1a inset, and 2c). We also found nonpolarized epithelial cells within the stroma that contained catalase-positive peroxisomes (Figure 3a, Figure 3b, and Figure 3d). Figure 3a and Figure 3b show duct of Hering regions of the bile ductule in which parenchymal hepatocytes and bile ductule cells are contiguous and desmosomes are present between the adjacent bile ductule cells and hepatocytes. Catalase-positive peroxisomes are seen only in hepatocytes (Figure 3ac), in polarized cells within the ductule (Figure 3b and Figure 3c), and in elongated nonpolarized cells within the connective tissue stroma (Figure 3a, Figure 3b, and Figure 3d). The less-differentiated basal cells we observed are not polarized like the bile ductule epithelial cells, i.e., their apical surface is not in contact with the ductule lumen and their basal surface does not rest on a basal lamina (Figure 3a). The basal cells are in close proximity to a subpopulation of bile ductule cells that extend thin cytoplasmic extensions around the basal cells and separate them from the basal lamina. Figure 4a illustrates more distinctly the ultrastructural features of basal cells and is a serial section of a previously published micrograph (Figure 6b in Novikoff et al. 1996b
). The basal cells resemble the undifferentiated or blast-like phenotype expected of stem cells. The basal cells exhibit a nucleus that occupies most of its interior, has a thin rim of cytoplasm with no or few organelles, is without plasma membrane specializations, and appears to have a clear zone around them. Figure 4a also illustrates the different cell types within the bile ductule, two of which had not been previously described in this model. In addition to the undifferentiated basal cell, another cell with polarized properties of the more typical bile ductule epithelium is seen. However, this polarized cell has a lighter cytoplasm and a larger nucleus. Earlier studies from our laboratory have shown that ductule cells with this phenotype acquired a few catalase-positive peroxisomes and were termed ductule transitional hepatocyte-like cells (Novikoff et al. 1996b
). The ultrastructural appearance of the ductule transitional cells resembles the ductal hepatocytes seen in bile ductule hyperplasia induced in rats by furan (Sirca et al. 1994). In the present study, we also found polarized ductule cells in the bile ductule that contained many catalase-positive peroxisomes (Figure 3b and Figure 3c). Profiles of polarized bile ductule epithelial cells containing catalase-positive peroxisomes appear to migrate from the ductule into the surrounding basal lamina (Figure 3c). In addition to polarized bile ductule cells with peroxisomes, there are nonpolarized cells with catalase-positive peroxisomes in the surrounding connective tissue stroma, suggesting that these cells also have hepatocyte properties. Two of these cells are seen between bile ductules and parenchymal hepatocytes (Figure 3d). In addition to peroxisomes, they contain the characteristic smooth endoplasmic reticulum of differentiated parenchymal hepatocytes but do not exhibit the plasma membrane specialization of differentiated hepatocytes such as bile canaliculi. The origin of the cells in the stroma and their relation to bile ductule epithelial cells containing catalase-positive peroxisomes in bile ductules, to parenchymal hepatocytes, and to nodular cells remains to be determined.

View larger version (200K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Liver sections of bile ductules (duct of Hering region) incubated for catalase activity. (a) Small, less-differentiated ductule cells (S) are present at the basal aspect of the ductule. The basal cells (S) are not in contact with the lumen (L) or the basal lamina (BL). A clear zone is seen around the basal cells. Thin cytoplasmic extensions project from bile ductule epithelial cells (large arrowheads) to surround the basal cells. Small arrowheads indicate desmosomes between parenchymal hepatocytes (H) and bile ductule epithelial cells (D). Many of the bile ductule cells exhibit irregular profiles. Peroxisomes (P) are seen in hepatocytes (H) and in an elongated cell (arrow) outside the duct of Hering in the connective tissue stroma. (b) A ductule transitional cell containing catalase-positive peroxisomes (P) is evident within the bile ductule between bile ductule epithelial cells (D) that do not contain peroxisomes. Desmosomes (small arrowheads) are present between the peroxisome-containing ductule transitional cell and the bile ductule epithelial cells. The ductule transitional cell is polarized, i.e., its apical surface faces a lumen (L) and its basal surface abuts a basal lamina (arrow). Desmosomes (large arrowheads) are present between parenchymal hepatocytes (Hp) and bile ductule epithelial cells (D). A nonpolarized cell (Hs) containing catalase-positive peroxisomes is seen in the connective tissue stroma. (c) A polarized ductule transitional cell (arrow) containing catalase-positive peroxisomes (P) is present within the bile ductule and appears to be migrating out into the connective tissue stroma. The apical aspect of the transitional cell is in contact with the ductule lumen (L) and is bordered by bile ductule epithelial cells (D). (d) Two nonpolarized cells (H1, H) containing catalase-positive peroxisomes, one elongated and the other a cross-section through the nucleus, are present within the connective tissue stroma between a bile ductule and a parenchymal hepatocyte (Hp). The elongated cell (H1) contains another characteristic of parenchymal hepatocytes, i.e., smooth endoplasmic reticulum. However, the plasma membrane does not exhibit a characteristic hepatocyte phenotype. Basal lamina (arrows) is seen close to the surface of the nonpolarized hepatocyte-like cells (H1, H). Also labeled are the ductule lumen (L), a fibroblast (F), and polarized ductule transitional epithelial cells (T) and bile ductule epithelial cells (D). Bars = 5 µm.
|
|

View larger version (158K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
(a) Section of a bile ductule within the hepatic lobule comparing the different morphologies of an undifferentiated basal cell (S), a ductule transitional cell (T), and bile ductule epithelial cells (D). The basal cell shows a high nucleus-to-cytoplasm ratio, has no cytoplasmic organelles or plasma membrane specializations, and is not exposed to the ductule lumen (L) or the basal lamina (arrow). The ductule transitional cell (T) and the bile ductule epithelial cells (D) show similar apicalbasal polarity. However, the transitional cell has a larger nucleus and lighter cytoplasm. Desmosomes (arrowheads) are present between the polarized ductule transitional cell and bile ductule epithelial cells. No desmosomes are present on the basal cell. (be) Sections of bile ductules showing basal cell replication and differentiation. (b) A basal cell (S) is seen in the metaphase stage of mitosis. Arrow indicates the chromosomes. The dividing basal cell located beneath a bile ductule cell (D) is not in contact with the ductule lumen (L) but is in contact with the basal lamina (arrowhead). A fibroblast (F) is seen in close proximity to the dividing basal cell. (c) Two basal cells (S) appear to be in the process of separating after the final stage of mitosis. Arrow indicates the site of cytoplasmic attachment. The basal cells are beneath a bile ductule epithelial cell (D). Arrowhead indicates a cytoplasmic extension from an adjacent bile ductule cell that encloses the separating basal cell. (d) Two basal cells have essentially completed mitosis. Arrow indicates a thin cytoplasmic bridge between them. The basal cells are not in contact with the ductule lumen (L) or the basal lamina (arrowheads). A fibroblast (F) is seen close to the basal cells. Also labeled are bile ductule epithelial cells (D) and ductule lumen (L). (e) A more differentiated basal cell (S) is evident. It is not in contact with the ductule lumen (L) but is in contact with the basal lamina (arrowhead). A fibroblast (F) is seen in close proximity to the basal cell. Bars = 5 µm.
|
|
Replication and Differentiation of Ductule Nonpolarized Basal Cells.
Our ultrastructural studies have confirmed the confocal microscopic studies indicating that basal cells undergo mitosis. Figure 4b shows a basal cell in a metaphase stage of mitosis that is located beneath a bile ductule epithelial cell. The chromososmes of the dividing basal cells are distinct. The mitotic basal cell is not in contact with the ductule lumen but is associated with the basal lamina. We have also found basal cells at the end of mitosis. Figure 4c and Figure 4d show the separation of two basal cells after the completion of mitosis. The two basal cells in Figure 4d may have resulted from the mitosis of a single basal cell because cytoplasmic connections are evident between them. These basal cells are not in contact with the basal lamina, in contrast to the mitotic basal cell in Figure 4b. We have also encountered basal cells within the ductules that appear more differentiated than the basal cell in Figure 4a or in Figure 6a of a previous publication (Novikoff et al. 1996b
). The more differentiated basal cells are most likely derived from the less-differentiated basal cells. Figure 4ce illustrate more differentiated basal cells beneath bile ductule cells. They have more cytoplasm but their plasma membrane surface is without specializations. The basal cells in Figure 4c and Figure 4d are not in contact with the ductule lumen or the basal lamina and are enclosed by cytoplasmic extensions of the adjacent bile ductule epithelial cells. The basal cells in Figure 4b and Figure 4e are also not in contact with the ductule lumen but are in contact with the basal lamina. We frequently find fibroblasts in close proximity to the region of the bile ductule at which basal cells are located (Figure 4b, Figure 4d, and Figure 4e).
Basal Cells Develop Plasma Membrane Structures.
The close proximity of basal cells and bile ductule epithelial cells is suggestive of a lineage relationship between them. To demonstrate whether the basal cells are progenitor cells to bile ductule cells or other hepatic cells, the basal cells have to be labeled with markers such as [3H]-thymidine or retroviral vectors so that more direct cell lineage studies can be performed. We have demonstrated that the basal cells divide, permitting such direct studies to be performed. Our laboratory is currently performing such studies. However, in the absence of more direct studies, we have been analyzing the basal cells for the acquisition of intrinsic structural plasma membrane markers characteristic of ductule epithelial cells, parenchymal hepatocytes, and preneoplastic nodular cells. These include apical microvilli, desmosomes, tight junctions, and gap junctions. These plasma membrane properties are detectable by electron microscopy and would provide strong but not unequivocal evidence that basal cells can differentiate into cells with an epithelial phenotype. Figure 5a shows a basal cell with a change in the structure of the plasma membrane that faces the ductule lumen. The plasma membrane has developed structures resembling microvilli. There is also a change in the lateral plasma membrane of the basal cell, suggesting possible development towards the establishment of cell polarity. We have also found that the basal cells develop another plasma membrane specialization, i.e., desmosomes. Figure 5b illustrates the presence of three small desmosomes that have developed between the plasma membrane of the basal cell and the bile ductule epithelial cell. The characteristic ultrastructure of the desmosomes is evident in the enlargement in the inset. Therefore, by an analysis of the ultrastructural properties of the plasma membrane of basal cells, we have suggestive evidence that the basal cells have the potential to differentiate into polarized ductule epithelial cells, parenchymal hepatocytes, and preneoplastic cells.

View larger version (136K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Section of bile ductule showing basal cell differentiation. (a) The basal cell (S) exhibits a structural change in the apical and basolateral plasma membrane, suggesting the development of polarity. The basal cell (S) is located beneath bile ductule epithelial cells (D). Arrow indicates the presence of structures on the apical aspect of the plasma membrane that resemble microvilli, which face the ductule lumen (L). The basal aspect of the basal cell is exposed to the basal lamina (large arrowhead). Note the close proximity of a fibroblast (F) to the basal cell. A ductule transitional cell (T) within the ductule is attached to bile ductule epithelial cells by desmosomes (small arrowheads) and is partially surrounded by one of the bile ductule epithelial cells. Bar = 5 µm. (b) A bile ductule contains a basal cell (S) that is underneath a bile ductule epithelial cell (D). Multiple desmosomes (arrowheads) have formed on the contiguous plasma membranes of the basal cell and the bile ductule epithelial cell. Bar = 5 µm. (Inset) An enlargement of the contiguous plasma membranes of the basal cell (S) and the bile ductule epithelial cell (D) shows the characteristic ultrastructure of desmosomal structures more distinctly (arrows). Bar = 1 µm.
|
|
 |
Discussion |
---|
Relation of Ductule Basal Cells to Stem Cells
Previous studies have suggested a variety of epithelial cell types as candidates for liver stem cells or progenitor cells. These included oval cells, bile ductule cells, periductular cells, transition duct cells, embryonic bipotential cells, and rat liver-derived epithelial (RLE) cell lines (Grisham and Porta 1964
; Lombardi 1982
; Sell and Salman 1984
; Tsao and Grisham 1987
; Marceau et al. 1989
; Fausto 1990
; Coleman et al. 1993
). We reported in a rat liver carcinogenic model the presence of nonepithelial ductule basal cells that exhibited an undifferentiated phenotype and differed from other previously reported putative stem or progenitor cells in that they are not polarized, as determined by actin localization in apical microvilli, and not epithelial, as determined by the absence of the epithelial marker cytokeratin-19 (Novikoff et al. 1996b
). The undifferentiated ductule basal cells have a blast-like nuclear and cytoplasmic morphology resembling the phenotype of stem or progenitor cells of the hematopoietic system (Van Bekkum 1977
). Our previous studies showed that the undifferentiated ductule basal cells do not have the morphology of lymphocytes and do not express T- and B-lymphocyte antigens (Novikoff et al. 1996b
). The location of the ductule basal cells at the basal aspect of the ductule parallels that of stem cells from other tissues, e. g., intestinal crypt stem cells, deep rete epidermal stem cells, and limbal region corneal stem cells (LeBlond 1981; Lavker and Sun 1983
; Cotsarelis et al. 1989
). The enclosure of the ductule basal cells by bile ductule epithelial cells provides a niche or protective environment similar to that observed in stem cells from renewing tissues (Potten and Loeffler 1990
; Alterman 1992
). We have also found that the undifferentiated ductule basal cells also replicate and progressively develop a more differentiated phenotype. It appears that the ductule basal cells undergo a differentiation program. They increase in size, acquire more cytoplasm, and they or their progeny exhibit changes in plasma membrane ultrastructure. The plasma membrane at the apical surface facing the ductule lumen develops surface microvilli and desmosomes and the entire plasma membrane profile of the cells appears polarized. The factors that control proliferation of basal cells and differentiation of basal cells from a nonpolarized phenotype to a polarized phenotype are not known. Of interest is the consistent observation of the close proximity of fibroblasts and collagen fibers to the region of the bile ductules at which the basal cells are located. There is evidence that growth factors and connective tissue components, e.g., collagen and laminin, may be involved in cell proliferation and differentiation. Other investigators have observed fibroblasts in close proximity to bile ductules during carcinogenesis that expressed the growth factor TGF-
and desmin (Evarts et al. 1993
). Whether the undifferentiated ductule basal cells we have found are putative liver stem cells, stem-cell progeny, or non-stem-cell progeny remains to be determined. It is known that for stem cells to be maintained they must undergo cell division to replenish themselves and produce non-stem-cell progeny that differentiate into mature cells (Potten and Loeffler 1990
). It is not known whether the ductule basal cells we have observed in mitosis belong to a true stem-cell compartment or to an amplifying transit cell compartment committed to differentiate. We have observed ductule basal cells larger than the smaller, undifferentiated ductule basal cells. However, even the largest of the ductule basal cells did not express epithelial markers at the early time points during liver carcinogenesis that we studied. However, studies of the liver at later times in the carcinogenic protocol may reveal that ductule basal cells have acquired other phenotypes of hepatic epithelial cells. This is expected because we have found some ductule cells that have developed plasma membrane specializations, including desmosomes and apical plasma membrane microvilli, at early stages of the protocol. Immunocytochemical studies are in progress to determine whether the plasma membrane specializations express proteins associated with plasma membrane structural components, e.g., connexins in gap junctions, desmoplakin in desmosomes, and actin in microvilli. These studies would provide further evidence that the ductule basal cells have the capacity to differentiate and may be progenitors of bile ductule epithelial cells, hepatocytes, and/or preneoplastic nodules. Related to our observations is the concept that stem cells or transit cells may be transformed or become malignant during replication. One view is that because stem cells or their progeny are long-lived and proliferate, they are more likely to be transformed by carcinogens and progress to carcinoma (Potten and Morris 1988
). Another variant of this view considers tumor development as a process that characterizes normal tissue development and that carcinomas arise from malignant stem cells that can differentiate but do not because they are perturbed or arrested and, as a result, an expanding population of proliferating tumor cells with various potentials for differentiation is produced (Pierce and Speers 1988
; Sell and Pierce 1994
).
Relation of Ductule Basal Cells to Preneoplastic Nodules
At present we have no direct evidence that the ductule basal cells enter a cell lineage pathway that gives rise to preneoplastic nodules in the DEN-AAF-PH rat model. Because the ductule basal cells replicate, it may be possible to label these cells with retroviral vectors and to follow their fate over time to determine their migration and differentiation into preneoplastic nodules. Because the hepatocytes are inhibited from proliferating in this model and the only cells that appear to proliferate are cells within the bile ductules, we may be able to provide direct evidence that a subpopulation of bile ductule cells contributes to the development of preneoplastic nodules. Several investigators (Williams 1980
; Cameron 1989
; Farber 1992
; Gerlyng et al. 1994
; Lin et al. 1995
) have reported that the progenitor cells responsible for the formation of nodules and hepatomas are carcinogen-altered parenchymal hepatocytes. It is also possible that there are multiple cell lineage pathways for nodular development operating simultaneously in the liver during carcinogenesis that involve altered hepatocytes as well as subpopulations of bile ductule cells.
Fate of Ductule Transitional Cells
In addition to the ductule nonpolarized basal cells, we have also observed, within the proliferating bile ductule cells, polarized transitional ductule cells that exhibit a cytoplasmic hepatocyte phenotype, i.e., catalase-positive peroxisomes. These cells within the ductules have properties of both bile ductule epithelial cells and of parenchymal hepatocytes. They have actin-positive microvilli on the plasma membrane surface facing the lumen and some are seen in contact with the basal lamina. Most of the transitional cells are cytokeratin-19-positive, although we have seen some that did not express this antigen. However, the ductule transitional cells differ from the bile ductule epithelial cells in that they exhibit a larger and rounder nucleus, a lighter cytoplasm, and few to many peroxisomes. The ductule transitional cells are most likely a later differentiation stage of a subpopulation of bile ductule epithelial cells. Undifferentiated basal cells are frequently seen in close association with transitional cells and with bile ductule epithelial cells, indicating a possible cell lineage relationship. We do not know whether the transitional cells derive from the undifferentiated ductule basal cells or from bile ductule epithelial cells. Several investigators have reported the differentiation of transitional epithelial cells from a proliferative population of bile ductule cells, termed oval cells in carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic protocols (Grisham and Porta 1964
; Evarts et al. 1987
; Marceau et al. 1989
; Fausto 1990
; Hixson et al. 1992
; Sell 1993
; Factor et al. 1994
; Sarraf et al. 1994
; Sirca et al. 1994). However, these studies were performed before it was known that there was heterogeneity in the cell types within the bile ductules and in the surrounding connective tissue stroma. We have not determined the fate of the ductule transitional cells containing catalase-positive peroxisomes. Ultrastructural observations indicate that ductule transitional cells migrate out of the bile ductule into the connective tissue stroma. We have also observed nonpolarized cells in the connective tissue stroma that exhibit a hepatocyte phenotype. Some of these cells are located between the bile ductules and the parenchymal hepatocytes. These observations suggest that these cells represent intermediate stages in a cell lineage pathway that begins in the proliferating bile ductules. We would like to determine the fate of the ductule transitional cells and the connective tissue stroma nonpolarized hepatocyte-like cells. We would like to know whether they are involved in the repopulation of the parenchymal hepatocytes or whether they contribute to the development of the preneoplastic nodule. We have not determined whether the ductule transitional cells have the functional capacity of bile ductule cells or hepatocytes. Studies are in progress to determine whether hepatocyte-specific receptors are expressed in the transitional cells.
Integration of Bile Ductule Cells Within the Hepatic Parenchyma
Our observations that subpopulations of cytokeratin-19-positive and GST-positive bile ductule cells integrate within the hepatic parenchyma by the formation of bile canaliculi and desmosome structures suggest that there are other bile ductule cells that can be categorized as transitional cells. The integrated bile ductule transitional cells have plasma membrane properties and cytoplasmic organelle phenotype different from those of the transitional cells described within the ductule and in the connective tissue stroma. One population of integrated transitional bile ductule cells has a dual polarity i.e., they are simultaneously attached to parenchymal hepatocytes and to other bile ductule cells organized around the ductule lumen, and they exhibit microvilli on two regions of their plasma membrane, one defined by the lumen held in common with other bile ductule cells and the other part of a canalicular structure with parenchymal hepatocytes. Another population of integrated transitional bile ductule cells has become fully integrated among the parenchymal hepatocytes within the hepatic cord and is not associated with bile ductule cells organized around a ductule lumen. Each subpopulation of integrated transitional bile ductule cells develops bile canalicular structures with hepatocytes that have similar properties to the bile canaliculi present between contiguous hepatocytes, i.e., the bile canaliculi are ATPase- and actin-positive and desmosomal structures are evident. However, in the dual polarized transitional bile ductule cells, ATPase is not detected in the ductule lumen. We have also observed that, at the site of attachment of the dual polarized transitional bile ductule cells with hepatocytes, there is a loss of the basal lamina. However, the basal lamina is evident surrounding the other bile ductule epithelial cells organized around the lumen. The factors that determine which bile ductule cells become attached to hepatocytes are not known. Studies are in progress to determine whether the integrated cells develop other hepatocyte phenotypes in addition to bile canaliculi. Confocal and electron microscopy in combination with enzyme cytochemistry and immunocytochemistry has been critical in determining the dual phenotype of the transitional bile ductule cells and their incorporation within the hepatic lobule. The integrated transitional bile ductule cells could easily have been interpreted as small differentiated hepatocytes. Previous studies in the DEN-AAF-PH rat model have reported GST-Yp-positive cells within the hepatic parenchyma in the same early stages of the protocol we have studied and have suggested that these cells were small, carcinogen-altered hepatocytes that will develop into preneoplastic nodules (Cameron 1989
; Farber 1992
). Studies are in progress to determine whether the ATPase- and GST-positive transitional cells we observed within the hepatic cord are similar to the GST-positive cells observed by other investigators. If indeed they are the same cells, this suggests that the preneoplastic nodule cells are in part derived from a subpopulation of bile ductule epithelial cells rather than from carcinogen-altered parenchymal hepatocytes. The integrated transitional cells have the capacity to replicate, thereby increasing their numbers within the hepatic lobule. These observations suggest that multiple cell lineage and sublineage pathways may be involved in liver restoration after partial hepatectomy and /or nodular development and that the pathways include a direct integration of subpopulations of transitional bile ductule cells and their replication within the hepatic cord. Nontransformed and neoplastically transformed RLE cells were reported to integrate into hepatic cords after intrahepatic transplantation (Coleman et al. 1993
, Coleman et al. 1997
). The integrated transitional bile ductule cells we describe and the integrated RLE cells may be derived from similar hepatic precursor cells located within the bile ductule system.
In summary, the most significant observation we report is the initiation of the differentiation of an undifferentiated ductule basal cell compartment that has a nonpolarized and nonepithelial phenotype within proliferating bile ductules in a liver carcinogenic rat model. The development of polarity, microvilli, and desmosomes, phenotypic differentiation markers similar to those of hepatic epithelial cells, on the plasma membrane surface of undifferentiated ductule basal cells provides convincing evidence that the ductule basal cells have entered a cell lineage pathway leading towards epithelial differentiation. Of interest is that the markers we have found associated with ductule basal cells are intrinsic markers of the plasma membrane of bile ductule epithelial cells, hepatocytes, and nodular cells. We propose that the nonpolarized, undifferentiated ductule basal cells that have a blast-like phenotype, replicate, and differentiate constitute a stem cell-like or progenitor cell compartment that gives rise to bile ductule cells, and possibly to hepatocytes and preneoplastic nodules, via multiple lineage and sublineage pathways. The other cell types we have observed, i.e., the polarized transitional ductule cells within the bile ductules, the nonpolarized transitional cells within the connective tissue stroma, and the polarized transitional bile ductule cells within the hepatic cords, most likely represent different stages of the multiple cell lineage pathways that are involved in the regeneration of the liver and/or the development of hepatomas. Studies are in progress to sort out the pathways and to determine the cellular origin of the preneoplastic nodules, as well as to determine whether there are multiple cell compartments with stem-cell properties.
 |
Acknowledgments |
---|
Supported by NIH grant CA06576.
We thank Michael Cammer, Analytical Imaging Facility, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, for expert assistance with the confocal microscopic studies.
Received for publication July 2, 1997; accepted September 4, 1997.
 |
Literature Cited |
---|
Alterman K (1992) The stem cells of the liver: a selective review. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 118:87-115[Medline]
Bisgaard HC, Nagy P, SantoniRugiu E, Thorgeirsson SS (1996) Proliferation, apoptosis and induction of hepatic transcription factors are characteristics of early response of biliary epithelial (oval) cells to chemical carcinogens. Hepatology 23:62-70[Medline]
Cameron RG (1989) Identification of the first cellular step of chemical carcinogenesis. Cancer Lett 47:163-167[Medline]
Cheng H, Leblond CP (1974) Origin, differentiation and renewal of four main epithelial cell types in the mouse intestine. Am J Anat 141:537-563[Medline]
Coleman WB, McCullough KD, Esch GL, Faris RA, Hixson DC, Smith GJ, Grisham JW (1997) Evaluation of the differentiation potential of WB-F344 rat liver epithelial stem-like cells in vivo. Am J Pathol 151:353-359[Abstract]
Coleman WB, Wennerberg AE, Smith GT, Grisham JW (1993) Regulation of the differentiation of diploid and some aneuploid rat liver epithelial (stem like) cells by the hepatic microenvironment. Am J Pathol 142:1373-1382[Abstract]
Cotsarelis G, Cheng SZ, Dong G, Sun TT, Lavker Rm (1989) Existence of slow-cycling limbal epithelial basal cells that can be preferentially stimulated to proliferate: implications on epithelial stem cells. Cell 57:201-211[Medline]
Cotsarelis G, Sun T, Lavker R (1990) Label-retaining cells reside in the bulge area of pilsebaceous unit: implications for follicular stem cell, hair cycle and skin carcinogenesis. Cell 61:1328-1337
Dunsford HA, Karnasuta C, Hunt JM, Sell SS (1989) Different lineages of chemically induced hepatocellular carcinoma in rats defined by monoclonals. Cancer Res 49:4894-4900[Abstract]
Evarts RP, Hu Z, Fujio K, Marsden ER (1993) Activation of hepatic stem cell compartment in the rat: role of transforming growth factor, hepatocytes growth factor and acidic fibroblast growth factor in early proliferation. Cell Growth Differ 4:555-561[Abstract]
Evarts RP, Nagy P, Marsden E, Thorgeirsson SS (1987) A precursor-product relationship exists between oval cells and hepatocytes in rat liver. Carcinogenesis 8:1737-1740[Abstract]
Factor VM, Radaeva SV, Thorgeirsson SS (1994) Origin and fate of oval cells in Dipin-induced hepatocarcinogenesis. Am J Pathol 145:409-422[Abstract]
Farber E (1992) On cells of origin of liver cell cancer. In Sirica AE, ed. The Role of Cell Types in Hepatocarcinogenesis. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, 1-28
Faris RA, Monfils BA, Dunsford HA, Hixson DC (1991) Antigenic relationship between oval cells and a subpopulation of hepatic foci, nodules and carcinomas induced by the "resistant hepatocyte" model system. Cancer Res 51:1308-1317[Abstract]
Fausto N (1990) Oval cells and liver carcinogenesis: an analysis of cell lineages in hepatic tumors using oncogene transfection techniques. Prog Clin Biol Res 331:325-334[Medline]
Gerlyng P, Grotmol T, Stokke T, Erikstein B, Seglen PO (1994) Flow cytometric investigation of a possible precursor-product relationship between oval cells and parenchymal cells in the rat liver. Carcinogenesis 15:53-59[Abstract]
Graham RC, Karnovsky MJ (1966) The early stages of absorption of injected horseradish peroxidase in the proximal tubules of mouse kidney: ultrastructural cytochemistry by a new technique. J Histochem Cytochem 14:291-302[Medline]
Grisham JW, Porta EA (1964) Origin and fate of proliferated hepatic ductal cells in the rat: electron microscopic and autoradiographic studies. Exp Mol Pathol 3:242-261
Heimann S, Weissman IL (1991) Development of mouse hematopoietic lineages. Curr Top Dev Biol 25:155-173[Medline]
Higgins GM, Anderson RM (1931) Experimental pathology of the liver I. Restoration of the liver of the white rat following partial surgical removal. Arch Pathol 12:186-202
Hixson DC, Faris RA, Yang L, Novikoff P (1992) Antigenic clues to liver development, renewal and carcinogenesis: an integrated model. In Sirca AE, ed. The Role of Cell Types in Hepatocarcinogenesis. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, 151-182
Karnovsky MJ (1965) A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolarity for use in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol 27:137A
Lavker RM, Sun TT (1983) Epidermal stem cells. J Invest Dermatol 81:121-128
Leblond CP (1981) The life history of cells in renewing systems. Am J Anat 160:114-121[Medline]
Lin Y-Z, Brunt EM, Bowling W, Hafenrichter DG, Kennedy SC, Flye MW, Ponder KP (1995) Ras-transduced diethylnitrosamine-treated hepatocytes develop into cancers of mixed phenotype in vivo. Cancer Res 55:5242-5250[Abstract]
Lombardi B (1982) On the nature, properties and significance of oval cells. In Pani P, Feo F, Columbano A, eds. Recent Trends in Chemical Carcinogenesis. Vol 1. Cagliari Italy ESA, 3, 7-56
Marceau N, Blouin M-J, Germain L, Noel M (1989) Role of epithelial cell types in liver ontogenesis, regeneration and neoplasia. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 25:336-341[Medline]
Novikoff PM, Cammer M, Tao L, Oda H, Stockert RJ, Wolkoff AW, Satir P (1996a) Three dimensional organization of rat hepatocyte cytoskeleton: relation to the asialoglycoprotein endocytosis pathway. J Cell Sci 109:21-32[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Novikoff PM, Ikeda T, Hixson DC, Yam A (1991) Characterizations of and interactions between bile ductule cells and hepatocytes in early stages of rat hepatocarcinogenesis induced by ethionine. Am J Pathol 139:1351-1368[Abstract]
Novikoff AB, Novikoff PM, Davis C, Quintana N (1977) Studies of microperoxisomes. II. A cytochemical method for light and electron microscopy. J Histochem Cytochem 20:1006-1023[Medline]
Novikoff PM, Yam A, Oikawa I (1996b) Blast-like cell compartment in carcinogen-induced proliferating bile ductules. Am J Pathol 148:1473-1492[Abstract]
Pierce GB, Speers WC (1988) Tumors as caricatures of the process of tissue renewal: prospects for therapy by directing differentiation. Cancer Res 48:1996-2002[Abstract]
Potten CS, Loeffler M (1990) Stem cells: attributes, cycles, spiral, pitfalls and uncertainties. Lessons from the crypt. Development 110:1001-1020[Abstract]
Potten CS, Morris RJ (1988) Epithelial stem cells in vivo. J Cell Sci 10(Suppl):45-56
Sarraf C, Lalani E-N, Golding M, Anikumar TV, Poulsom R, Alison M (1994) Cell behavior in the acetylaminofluorese-treated regenerating rat liver. Am J Pathol 145:1114-1126[Abstract]
Sell S (1993) The role of determined stem-cells in the cellular lineage of hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Dev Biol 37:189-201[Medline]
Sell S, Pierce GB (1994) Maturation arrest of stem cells differentiation is a common pathway for the cellular origin of teratocarcinomas and epithelial cancers. Lab Invest 70:6-22[Medline]
Sell SS, Salman J (1984) Light and electron microscopic autoradiographic analysis of proliferating cells during the early stages of chemical carcinogenesis in the rat induced by feeding N-2-fluorenylacetamide in a choline deficient diet. Am J Pathol 114:287-300[Abstract]
Sigal SH, Brill S, Reid LM (1992) The liver as a stem cell and lineage system. Am J Physiol 263:G139-G148[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Sirica AE, Cole SI, Williams T (1994) A unique rat model of bile ductular hyperplasia in which liver is almost totally replaced with well differentiated bile ductules. Am J Pathol 144:1257-1268[Abstract]
Solt DB, Medline A, Farber E (1977) Rapid emergence of carcinogen-induced hyperplastic lesions in a new model for the sequential analysis of liver carcinogenesis. Am J Pathol 88:595-610[Medline]
Thorgeirsson SS (1995) Stem cells and hepatocarcinogenesis. In Jirtle RL, ed. Liver Regeneration and Carcinogenesis, Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms. San Diego, Academic Press, 99-112
Tsao MS, Grisham JW (1987) Hepatocarcinomas, cholangiocarcinomas and hepatoblastomas produced by chemically transformed cultures of rat liver epithelial cells: a light and electron microscopic analysis. Am J Pathol 127:168-181[Abstract]
Van Bekkum DW (1977) The appearance of the multipotential hemopoietic stem cell. In Baum SJ, Ledney GD, eds. Experimental Hematology Today. New York, Springer-Verlag, 3-10
Wachstein M, Meisel E (1957) Histochemistry of hepatic phosphatase at a physiological pH. Am J Clin Pathol 27:13-18
Williams GM (1980) The pathogenesis of rat liver cancer caused by chemical carcinogens. Biochim Biophys Acta 605:167-189[Medline]
Wilson JW, Leduc EH (1958) Role of cholangioles in restoration of the liver of the mouse after dietary injury. J Pathol Bacteriol 76:441-449