Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, Vol. 47, 1237-1246, October 1999, Copyright © 1999, The Histochemical Society, Inc.


ARTICLE

Selective but Nonspecific Immunolabeling of Enamel Protein-associated Compartments by a Monoclonal Antibody Against Vimentin

Kaj Josephsena, Charles E. Smithb, and Antonio Nancic
a Department of Dental Pathology, Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Royal Dental College, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
b Departments of Anatomy and Oral Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
c Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Dentistry, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Correspondence to: Antonio Nanci, Dépt. de Stomatologie, Faculté de Médecine Dentaire, Université de Montréal, CP 6138, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3C 3J7. E-mail: nancia@ere.umontreal.ca


  Summary
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Vimentin, an intermediate filament component, has been identified in many mesenchymal cells by a variety of LM and EM immunolabeling techniques. In our study, several tissue-processing conditions and monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies against vimentin were screened for immunostaining of rat incisor odontoblasts. Using postembedding colloidal gold immunocytochemistry, we were unable to detect any convincing vimentin antigenicity in these cells, but one of the monoclonal antibodies (V9-S) unexpectedly resulted in intense labeling over intra- and extracellular compartments that normally are strongly immunoreactive with anti-amelogenin antibodies. Blocking experiments showed that V9-S binding was competed by anti-amelogenin antibody. Immunoblots indicated that enamel proteins reacted with this anti-vimentin antibody after fixation with glutaraldehyde. These data suggest that the observed immunoreaction is directed against an epitope apparently created by crosslinking of enamel proteins during fixation. Although the labeling cannot be considered specific, it is nevertheless selective because it is very precisely localized over compartments containing enamel proteins and shows no binding to other calcified dental tissues, including dentin and bone. The V9-S antibody can therefore be used as a reliable probe to identify the presence and distribution of amelogenins in fixed tissues. (J Histochem Cytochem 47:1237–1245, 1999)

Key Words: vimentin, immunocytochemistry, immunoblotting, amelogenesis, enamel proteins, incisor, rat


  Introduction
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Tooth development is mediated by reciprocal epithelial–mesenchymal interactions between neural crest-derived ectomesenchymal cells and the oral epithelium (reviewed in Slavkin 1990 ; Ruch et al. 1995 ; Thesleff et al. 1996 ). Ectomesenchymal cells give rise to odontoblasts that produce the collagen-containing dentin, whereas spatially specific cells of oral epithelial origin differentiate into ameloblasts, which synthesize and secrete the enamel matrix. Heterotypic cell contacts are believed to comprise one mechanism for interactions between these two cell types during histodifferentiation (Ruch et al. 1983 ; Frank and Nalbandian 1989 ; Sasaki 1990 ). In the early stages of odontogenesis, when an initial layer of mantle predentin is being deposited, finger-like processes extend from the apical surface of differentiating ameloblasts into the predentin, where they contact odontoblast cell processes (Lester 1970 ; Silva and Kailis 1972 ; Sisca and Provenza 1972 ; Katchburian and Burgess 1977 ; Meyer et al. 1977 ; Kallenbach and Piesco 1978 ). In addition, some odontoblast processes extend into the ameloblast layer and invaginate their apical cell membrane (Kallenbach 1971 , Kallenbach 1976 ; Slavkin and Bringas 1976 ).

The initial objective of this study was to characterize the frequency with which odontoblast processes invaginate into differentiating ameloblasts. Because these small cytoplasmic extensions are difficult to identify and distinguish morphologically in cross-sections, we originally planned to use vimentin antibodies to "tag" and make them more visible. This intermediate filament protein is typically associated with mesenchymal cells (Lazarides 1982 ; Steinert and Roop 1988 ; Van de Klundert et al. 1993 ) and has been found in odontoblasts by immunofluorescence (Lesot et al. 1982 ; Sigal et al. 1985 ; Fausser et al. 1990 ; Webb et al. 1995 ) and immunoperoxidase labeling (Lombardi et al. 1992b ; Byers and Sugaya 1995 ). Although vimentin has been revealed in many mesenchymal cell types by immunogold labeling (Shapiro et al. 1995 ; Kameda 1996a , Kameda 1996b ), we were unable to obtain evidence of vimentin antigenicity in odontoblasts under the tissue processing conditions used in this study. Instead, very strong immunolabeling was found with one of the antibodies over compartments that normally contain enamel proteins. The present study was therefore redirected to further examine this unexpected crossreactivity and to determine whether it is selective for enamel proteins.


  Materials and Methods
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Tissue Preparation for Immunocytochemistry
Male Wistar rats (Charles Rivers Canada; St-Constant, Quebec, Canada) weighing approximately 100 g were anesthetized with chloral hydrate (Sigma Chemical; St Louis, MO) and perfused through the ascending aorta with lactated Ringer's solution (Abbott; Montreal, Quebec, Canada) for 30 sec and then with either 4% paraformaldehyde containing 0.1% glutaraldehyde or 1% or 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 20 min. All fixatives were buffered with 0.08 M sodium cacodylate containing 0.05% CaCl2 at pH 7.3. After perfusion, the hemimandibles were removed and immersed in their respective fixative overnight at 4C. Some hemimandibles were decalcified in 4.13% disodium EDTA at 4C (Warshawsky and Moore 1967 ) for 3 weeks. Segments (5 mm) from the apical ends of both calcified and decalcified incisors were prepared and washed repeatedly in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.3. They were then postfixed with potassium ferrocyanide-reduced OsO4 (Neiss 1984 ) for 2 hr at 4C and conventionally processed for embedding in various resins as described below. All animal procedures described above were in accordance with guidelines of the Comité de Déontologie de l'Expérimentation sur les Animaux of Université de Montréal.

Thin sections of the tissues were cut with a diamond knife on a Reichert Ultracut E ultramicrotome, mounted on 200-mesh nickel grids having a carbon-coated Formvar film, and processed for postembedding colloidal gold immunolabeling (reviewed in Bendayan 1995b ). Sections of Epon- and LR White-embedded tissues were stained with 4% aqueous uranyl acetate for 5 min and with Reynolds lead citrate for 3 min, whereas those of Lowicryl K4M-embedded samples were stained for 10 min with uranyl acetate and 1 min with lead citrate. All sections were examined in a JEOL JEM 2000FX-II transmission electron microscope operated at 80 kV.

Tissue Processing for Embedding
Epoxy Resin. Some incisor samples fixed in 1% or 2.5% glutaraldehyde and postfixed in reduced osmium were dehydrated in a graded series of acetone (30–100%). They were then infiltrated for 8–12 hr with a 1:1 and 2:1 mixture of Epon substitute resin (Meca Laboratories; Montreal, QC, Canada) and pure acetone, followed by pure resin for 5 hr under vacuum. Tissues were embedded in a fresh mixture of pure resin and were polymerized for 2 days at 60C.

LR White. Other tooth samples fixed in 1% glutaraldehyde and postfixed in reduced osmium were dehydrated in graded concentrations of ethanol (30–100%) and infiltrated with a 1:1 mixture of LR White resin (hard grade; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Watford–Hertfordshire, UK) and absolute ethanol for 1 hr, followed by three 1-hr changes in pure LR White resin, all at room temperature (RT). The tissues were then embedded in pure LR White in gelatin capsules and the resin was polymerized at 48C for 2 days.

Lowicryl K4M. Nonosmicated tissue segments from animals fixed in paraformaldehyde/glutaraldehyde mixture were processed for embedding in a cryosubstitution apparatus (CS auto; Reichert–Jung, Wien, Austria). They were dehydrated in 30% methanol at 0C, in 50% methanol at -20C, and in 75% methanol at -35C for 30 min each, and in 90% methanol for 60 min at -35C. The tissues were then infiltrated at -35C for periods of 60 min with 1:1 and 2:1 mixtures of Lowicryl K4M (Chemische Werke Lowi; Waldkraiburg, Germany) and 90% methanol, followed by pure Lowicryl K4M overnight. They were then embedded in pure resin in plastic molds and polymerized for 2 days at -35C using the UV illuminator arrangement of the CS auto apparatus.

Immunocytochemical Procedures
Antibody Incubation. All immunocytochemical procedures were performed at RT. Grid-mounted sections of osmicated tissues embedded in Epon or LR White were pretreated with saturated sodium metaperiodate for 1 hr (Bendayan and Zollinger 1983 ) and rinsed with distilled water before incubation with the respective antibodies, as follows. Sections were floated for 5 min on a drop of 0.01 M PBS containing 1% ovalbumin (Sigma) and then transferred and incubated for periods ranging from 1 to 9 hr on a drop of diluted primary antibody (see Table 1 for a list of the various antibodies used and their abbreviated names). After incubation with some of the primary antibodies, sections were rinsed with PBS and again blocked with PBS–1% ovalbumin for 5 min before further incubation for 1 hr with a secondary antibody (see Table 1). The incubation with secondary antibodies was followed by rinsing with PBS and floating on PBS–1% ovalbumin for 5 min. In all cases, the sites of antibody–antigen binding were revealed by floating grids on a drop of protein A–gold complex (Bendayan 1995b ) prepared in house using colloidal particles of approximately 14 nm (Frens 1973 ). The grids were then rinsed with PBS, washed thoroughly with distilled water, and air-dried before heavy metal staining (see above).


 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Primary and secondary antibodies used for incubation, their working dilutions, time of incubation, and commercial sources/catalog and lot numbers

For controls, grid-mounted sections were incubated with secondary antibody only (see Table 1) followed by protein A–gold, or with protein A–gold alone.

Evaluation of the Specificity of the Anti-vimentin Immunolabeling by Competitive Binding
Lectin–Gold Cytochemistry. Tissue sections of Lowicryl-embedded samples were floated on a drop of wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) at a concentration of 25 µg/ml for 1 hr, rinsed with PBS, and incubated for 30 min with ovomucoid–gold (8-nm) prepared as described in Nanci et al. 1989 and diluted 1:20. Both WGA and ovomucoid were purchased from Sigma.

Immunolabeling with Antibody to Amelogenin. Sections of nonosmicated tissues were first incubated with AMEL antibody (see Table 1) for 1 hr, rinsed with PBS, and floated on PBS–1% ovalbumin (5 min), followed by V9-S antibody (diluted 1:10) for 1 hr. To exclude the possibility that steric hindrance of the AMEL IgG might affect the labeling pattern of V9-S antibody, nonosmicated sections were floated on WGA (25 µg/ml) for 1 hr before incubation with clone V9-S (dilution 1:10) for 1 hr. All sections were then rinsed and incubated with protein A–gold as described above.

Immunoblotting. Purified vimentin (Sigma), human fibroblast lysate, and proteins extracted from freeze-dried secretory stage enamel samples (Smith et al. 1989 ) were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto 0.45 µm nitrocellulose membranes for immunoblotting as previously described (Chen et al. 1995 ). The blots were probed with V9-S antibody and AMEL antibody and revealed with appropriate alkaline phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Chen et al. 1995 ). Some blots were fixed with 1% glutaraldehyde before incubation with the antibodies.


  Results
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Four antibodies against vimentin were tested on plastic sections of rat incisors for their ability to immunoreact with odontoblasts. None showed any significant immunolabeling in these cells. However, some of these antibodies were found to localize over intra- and extracellular compartments of ameloblasts previously shown to contain amelogenins (Nanci et al. 1987 ). Tissue fixation with 2.5% glutaraldehyde yielded little or no immunoreactivity over these compartments, whereas labeling was observed with both 1% glutaraldehyde and 4% paraformaldehyde + 0.1% glutaraldehyde. There were no apparent differences in the distribution of binding sites in calcified and decalcified specimens. Qualitative assessments of the density of labeling for various anti-vimentin antibodies are shown in Table 2. Antibody V9-S consistently resulted in the highest labeling density with all resins. As examples, the dense patches of enamel proteins among the collagen fibrils of the forming mantle predentin or adjacent to odontoblast processes were (Figure 1 and Figure 2), the enamel layer (Figure 3), and patches of granular material between odontoblasts and/or ameloblasts (not shown) were intensely immunoreactive. Intracellularly, the Golgi apparatus, secretory granules, and multivesicular bodies of ameloblasts were labeled (Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 and Figure 6B). Occasionally, the cisternae of the rough endoplasmic reticulum were dilated and contained accumulations of immunoreactive material (Figure 5).



View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Electron micrograph of rat incisor presecretory stage ameloblasts (PS-Am) at a position where they show short cytoplasmic processes (asterisks) extending into the forming mantle predentin. Patches of electron-dense material (arrows) are found near the apical surface of the ameloblasts. An odontoblast process (Odp) extends into a deep membrane invagination (arrowheads) at the apical surface of an ameloblast. (Inset) Immunocytochemical preparation with V9-S. Many gold particles are present over the patches of electron-dense matrix. sg, secretory granule. Bars = 0.5 µm.



View larger version (165K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figures 2-5. Electron micrographs of presecretory (PS-Am) and secretory (S-Am) stage ameloblasts from tissue sections incubated with V9-S.

Figure 2-3 Gold particles are present over enamel protein-containing compartments such as electron-dense patches (arrows) in mantle predentin, secretory granules (sg) in Tomes' processes (Tomes), and over enamel.

Figure 4 Weak but distinct labeling (arrowheads) is seen over the Golgi apparatus. Multivesicular bodies (mvb) are also immunoreactive.

Figure 5 Many gold particles decorate the material found in distended rough endoplasmic reticulum (rER) profiles situated in the infranuclear compartment of some presecretory stage ameloblasts. N, nucleus; m, mitochondria; SI, stratum intermedium. Bars = 0.5 µm.



View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Immunocytochemical preparations of sections from nonosmicated Lowicryl-embedded secretory stage ameloblasts and enamel. (A) Intense labeling for amelogenin (AMEL) is seen over secretory granules (sg) in Tomes' process (Tomes) and over the surrounding enamel. (B) A similarly intense immunolabeling is obtained after incubation with V9-S. (C) When tissue sections are reacted with AMEL antibody before incubation with V9-S, the labeling over enamel and secretory granules is abolished. Bars = 0.5 µm.


 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Immunogold labeling a over secretory stage enamel in sections incubated with different antibodies to vimentin

Antibody V9-BM gave almost no immunolabeling over ameloblasts, regardless of resin type. The density of gold particles over enamel was also highly variable in relation to embedding media and fixatives used (Table 2). Antibody V-poly gave only weak immunolabeling over the enamel matrix, whereas antibody V-3B4 showed no immunoreactivity over intra- and extracellular amelogenin-containing compartments (Table 2).

Sections incubated with AMEL showed labeling comparable to that of V9-S (Figure 6A and Figure 6B). Competitive incubations with AMEL followed by V9-S resulted in significant abolition of the labeling normally obtained with V9-S (Figure 6C). Sections of Lowicryl K4M-embedded samples incubated with WGA followed by ovomucoid–gold likewise showed many gold particles over secretory granules and enamel (Figure 7A). Lectin binding sites were conspicuously concentrated at enamel growth sites (Figure 7A). However, incubation of sections with WGA before labeling with V9-S did not affect binding of the antibody to the tissue sections, as did AMEL (compare Figure 6C and Figure 7B).



View larger version (163K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Sections from nonosmicated Lowicryl-embedded secretory stage ameloblasts and enamel. (A) Lectin–gold cytochemical preparation illustrating the presence of WGA binding sites in secretory granules (sg) and in enamel. Note the concentration of gold particles at the rod growth site (RGS). (B) Preincubation of the section with WGA before exposure to V9-S resulted in little change in the intensity of immunolabeling over enamel and secretory granules (compare with Figure 6B). Tomes, Tomes' process. Bars = 0.5 µm.

Unfixed secretory stage enamel proteins incubated with V9-S were unreactive. In constrast, purified vimentin and proteins extracted from cultured human fibroblasts showed strong immunostaining (Figure 8). However, when the enamel proteins were fixed with 1% glutaraldehyde before staining with the antibody, immunoreactive bands below 31 kD were revealed. The AMEL antibody did not significantly stain vimentin or any proteins in extracts from cultured human fibroblasts in fixed blots (Figure 8). Faintly stained bands were observed near 60 kD in blots of unfixed vimentin and enamel extracts but not in fibroblast extracts (Figure 8).



View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Immunoblots probed with V9-S and AMEL antibodies. The column at left shows standard broad-range molecular weight marker proteins (MW) stained with Ponceau. Each panel contains purified vimentin (V), human fibroblast lysate (F), and bulk protein extract from secretory stage enamel (E). After protein transfer, some nitrocellulose membranes were fixed with 1% glutaraldehyde before incubation with antibodies. Enamel proteins in the unfixed blots are not recognized by V9-S. However, proteins below 31 kD are revealed after fixation. Staining of vimentin and fibroblast extract samples was not significantly affected by fixation. Note also that both samples were not stained by AMEL. Whereas weak staining of some higher molecular weight bands with AMEL was abolished by fixation, staining of many enamel proteins below 31 kD was surprisingly intensified.


  Discussion
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Vimentin has been detected in various mesenchymal cells types of the tooth organ, including odontoblasts (Lyn et al. 1991 ; Seux et al. 1991 ; Inoue et al. 1992 ; Lombardi et al. 1992a ; Davidson 1994 ; Papagerakis et al. 1999 ). The fact that we were unable to detect its presence in odontoblasts by high-resolution immunocytochemistry may be due to denaturation of antigenic sites during tissue processing and/or to its presence in amounts that are below the detectability threshold of postembedding colloidal gold immunolabeling. The latter possibility is likely because we have been able to obtain labeling in some periodontal ligament fibroblasts under similar tissue-processing conditions (unpublished observations). Indeed, it should be noted that even with pre-embedding colloidal gold labeling, only a very weak vimentin immunoreaction was observed in cultured dental follicle cells (Wise et al. 1992 ) and none was observed in odontoblasts.

A variety of monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies against enamel proteins have been used over the years to elucidate the process of amelogenesis (reviewed in Nanci and Smith 1992 ). The protein synthesis pathway for amelogenins has been well characterized, and these proteins have been immunodetected in the Golgi apparatus, secretory granules, and multivesicular bodies of ameloblasts. Extracellularly, they are found in enamel and in patches of material among collagen fibrils of the mantle predentin and along the basolateral surfaces of both ameloblasts and odontoblasts (reviewed in Nanci and Smith 1992 ). Comparison of the labeling obtained with V9-S, in particular, and with AMEL indicates that their labeling patterns are identical. Much to our surprise, V9-BM, a monoclonal from the same clone as V9-S, resulted in generally weaker labeling in Epon-embedded tissues, even after prolonged incubation times (see Table 2). Differences in their production and handling may in part explain the discrepancy in labeling density between the two vimentin antibodies. Irrespective of this difference, only V9-S and V9-BM labeled intracellular enamel protein-containing compartments. Antibody V-3B4 showed no labeling at all, and V-poly revealed very few binding sites only in LR White- and Lowicryl-embedded enamel. Therefore, the V9 clone antibody to vimentin appears to behave very much like an anti-amelogenin antibody. It is evident from the immunoblots that this effect is created solely as a consequence of tissue fixation. We therefore conclude that the reaction we observe in the tissue sections is not specific for enamel proteins but is still selective because it localizes only over enamel protein-containing compartments and shows no binding to other dental proteins, such as those found in dentin. Moreover, because V9-S binding can be blocked with AMEL, the epitopes recognized by these two antibodies must be very close. To evaluate the possibility that this abolishment was related to "crowding" (steric hinderance), blocking was also carried out with WGA, a lectin previously shown to bind to enamel (Nanci et al. 1989 ). Although the possibility of steric hinderance cannot be completely ruled out, it is unlikely that "crowding" plays a significant role in abolition of the labeling with V9-S, because the intense staining obtained with WGA does not affect binding efficiency of V9-S.

There are two major families of enamel proteins, amelogenins and nonamelogenins (reviewed in Robinson et al. 1995 ; Smith and Nanci 1996 ). Because the protein bands in the amelogenin stack contain both intact proteins and degradation forms of higher molecular weight proteins (see Smith and Nanci 1996 ), our data do not enable us to conclude unequivocally that V9-S binds exclusively to amelogenins. However, its pattern of labeling over enamel is clearly distinct from that obtained with antibodies to nonamelogenins, such as ameloblastin, and is very similar to that seen for amelogenin (reviewed in Nanci et al. 1998 ). Taken together, the data strongly suggest that V9-S probably binds to intact and/or degradative fragments of amelogenin. Because this antibody behaves similarly to anti-amelogenin antibodies, it may represent a useful tool for detecting and mapping of the distribution of this class of enamel proteins. Furthermore, because the labeling density increases when the concentration of enamel protein increases, e.g., in the dilated rough endoplasmic reticulum, the antibody could also be used for quantitative applications.

Monoclonal antibodies are directed against narrow determinants consisting of a few amino acids that can recur on several proteins and peptides. Therefore, it is not surprising that some monoclonals yield labelings on totally unrelated proteins from different tissues. In this regard, a monoclonal antibody against a monocyte–macrophage protein has similarly been found to bind to enamel proteins of less than 30 kD (Nakamura et al. 1991 ). A number of polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies to osteocalcin, a bone protein, have been shown to crossreact with epitopes on cultured skin fibroblasts (Bradbeer et al. 1994 ). Crossreactivity of an anti-human proinsulin antibody with both insulin- and glucagon-secreting cells has recently been demonstrated (Bendayan 1995a ). Most studies dealing with antibody crossreactivity, however, have been carried out on fixed tissues. It is therefore impossible to determine whether the reactivity observed was due to shared epitopes (crossreactivity) or to epitopes that were secondarily generated during aldehyde crosslinking. Crossreactivity can be ruled out in our present study because antibody binding to enamel proteins was obtained only after fixation, and because there is no significant homology between amelogenin and vimentin. Hence, whatever motif (amino acid sequence, post-translational modification, and/or three-dimensional conformation) is being recognized by V9-S, it does not exist on native amelogenin and its formation is favored by tissue processing conditions (discussed in Bendayan 1995b ). Although the possibility of false-positives clearly dictates that care should be taken in interpretation of immunolabeling, once the binding spectrum of an antibody has been clearly defined, as illustrated here, it is possible to take advantage of its selective characteristics to map the distribution of known molecules and even, perhaps, to help identify yet unknown ones.


  Acknowledgments

Supported by grants from Calcinfonden, the Danish Dental Association (KJ), and the Medical Research Council of Canada (AN,CES).

We wish to thank Dr Wei-Yu Chen for preparing the Western blots used in Figure 8. We are also grateful to Merete Andersen and Micheline Fortin for technical assistance and to Sylvia Zalzal for preparing the protein A–gold complexes used for labeling.

Received for publication April 9, 1999; accepted May 18, 1999.


  Literature Cited
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Bendayan M (1995a) Possibilities of false immunocytochemical results generated by the use of monoclonal antibodies: the example of the anti-proinsulin antibody. J Histochem Cytochem 43:881-886[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bendayan M (1995b) Colloidal gold post-embedding immunocytochemistry. Prog Histochem Cytochem 29:1-163[Medline]

Bendayan M, Zollinger M (1983) Ultrastructural localization of antigenic sites on osmium-fixed tissues applying the protein A–gold technique. J Histochem Cytochem 31:101-109[Abstract]

Bradbeer JN, Virdi AS, Serre CM, Beresford JN, Delmas PD, Reeve J, Triffitt JT (1994) A number of osteocalcin antisera recognize epitopes on proteins other than osteocalcin in cultured skin fibroblasts: implications for the identification of cells of the osteoblastic lineage in vitro. J Bone Miner Res 9:1221-1228[Medline]

Byers MR, Sugaya A (1995) Odontoblast processes in dentin revealed by fluorescent Di-I. J Histochem Cytochem 43:159-168[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chen W-Y, Nanci A, Smith CE (1995) Immunoblotting studies on artifactual contamination of enamel homogenates by albumin and other proteins. Calcif Tissue Int 57:145-151[Medline]

Davidson RM (1994) Neural form of voltage-dependent sodium current in human cultured dental pulp cells. Arch Oral Biol 39:613-620[Medline]

Fausser JL, Lesot H, Zidan G, Ruch J-V (1990) Characterization of a mouse monoclonal antibody to vimentin by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy and immunoblotting. J Biol Buccale 18:29-33[Medline]

Frank RM, Nalbandian J (1989) Development of dentine and pulp. In Oksche A, Vollrath L, eds. Handbook of Microscopic Anatomy. Vol V/6. Teeth. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 73-171

Frens G (1973) Controlled nucleation for the regulation of particle size in monodispersed gold suspensions. Nature Phys Sci 241:20-22

Inoue T, Chen SH, Usuda J, Morohushi Y, Shimono M (1992) Osteogenic activity of cells from dental pulp, periodontal ligament, bone marrow and muscle in vitro: an ultrastructural study and alkaline-phosphatase activity. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 33:7-12[Medline]

Kallenbach E (1971) Electron microscopy of the differentiating rat incisor ameloblast. J Ultrastruct Res 35:508-531[Medline]

Kallenbach E (1976) Fine structure of differentiating ameloblasts in the kitten. Am J Anat 145:283-318[Medline]

Kallenbach E, Piesco NP (1978) The changing morphology of the epithelium-mesenchyme interface in the differentiation zone of growing teeth of selected vertebrates and its relationship to possible mechanisms of differentiation. J Biol Buccale 6:229-240[Medline]

Kameda Y (1996a) Ultrastructural immunogold localization of vimentin and S-100 protein in guinea pig pars tuberalis. J Histochem Cytochem 44:511-518[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kameda Y (1996b) Immunoelectron microscopic localization of vimentin in sustentacular cells of the carotid body and the adrenal medulla of guinea pigs. J Histochem Cytochem 44:1439-1449[Abstract]

Katchburian E, Burgess AMC (1977) Fine structure of contacts between ameloblasts and odontoblasts in the rat tooth germ. Arch Oral Biol 22:551-553[Medline]

Lazarides E (1982) Intermediate filaments: a chemically heterogeneous, developmentally regulated class of proteins. Annu Rev Biochem 51:219-250[Medline]

Lesot H, Meyer JM, Ruch J-V, Weber K, Osborn M (1982) Immunofluorescent localization of vimentin, prekeratin and actin during odontoblast and ameloblast differentiation. Differentiation 21:133-137[Medline]

Lester KS (1970) On the nature of "fibrils" and tubules in developing enamel of the oppossum, Didelphis marsupialis. J Ultrastruct Res 30:64-77[Medline]

Lombardi T, Samson J, Bernard JP, Di Felice R, Fiore-Donno G (1992a) Comparative immunohistochemical analysis between jaw myxoma and mesenchymal cells of tooth germ. Pathol Res Pract 188:141-144[Medline]

Lombardi T, Samson J, Mühlhauser J, Fiore-Donno G, Maggiano N, Castellucci M (1992b) Expression of intermediate filaments and actins in human dental pulp and embryonic dental papilla. Anat Rec 234:587-592[Medline]

Lyn P, Fiore–Donno G, Lombardi T (1991) The connective tissue cells of human dental pulp: an histologic and immunohistochemical study. Bull Group Int Res Sci Stomatol Odontol 34:133-137

Meyer JM, Fabre M, Staubli A, Ruch JV (1977) Relations cellulaires au cours de l'odontogenèse. J Biol Buccale 5:107-119[Medline]

Nakamura M, Kindaichi K, Kagayama M (1991) Immunohistochemical and immunochemical detection of a similar epitope in enamel proteins and monocyte-macrophage protein recognized by mouse monoclonal antibody MOMA-2. Arch Oral Biol 36:619-622[Medline]

Nanci A, Ahluwalia JP, Zalzal S, Smith CE (1989) Cytochemical and biochemical characterization of glycoproteins in forming and maturing enamel of the rat incisor. J Histochem Cytochem 37:1619-1633[Abstract]

Nanci A, Slavkin HC, Smith CE (1987) Application of high-resolution immunocytochemistry to the study of the secretory, resorptive, and degradative functions of ameloblasts. Adv Dent Res 1:148-161[Medline]

Nanci A, Smith CE (1992) Development and calcification of enamel. In Bonucci E, ed. Calcification in Biological Systems. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, 313-343

Nanci A, Zalzal S, Lavoie P, Kunikata M, Chen W-Y, Krebsbach PH, Yamada Y, Hammarström L, Simmer JP, Fincham AG, Snead ML, Smith CE (1998) Comparative immunochemical analyses of the developmental expression and distribution of ameloblastin and amelogenin in rat incisors. J Histochem Cytochem 46:911-934[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Neiss WF (1984) Electron staining of the cell surface coat by osmium-low ferrocyanide. Histochemistry 80:231-242[Medline]

Papagerakis P, Peuchmaur M, Hotton D, Ferkdadji L, Delmas P, Sasaki S, Tagaki T, Berdal A (1999) Aberrant gene expression in epithelial cells of mixed odontogenic tumors. J Dent Res 78:20-30[Abstract]

Robinson C, Kirkham J, Brookes SJ, Bonass WA, Shore RC (1995) The chemistry of enamel development. Int J Dev Biol 39:145-152[Medline]

Ruch JV, Lesot H, Begue–Kirn C (1995) Odontoblast differentiation. Int J Dev Biol 39:51-68[Medline]

Ruch J-V, Lesot H, Karcher–Djuricic V, Meyer JM, Mark M (1983) Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in tooth germs: mechanisms of differentiation. J Biol Buccale 11:173-193[Medline]

Sasaki T (1990) Cell biology of tooth enamel formation. In Myers HM, ed. Monographs in Oral Science. Basel, Karger, 1-204

Seux D, Couble ML, Hartmann DJ, Gauthier JP, Magloire H (1991) Odontoblast-like cytodifferentiation of human dental pulp cells in vitro in the presence of a calcium hydroxide-containing cement. Arch Oral Biol 36:117-128[Medline]

Shapiro F, Cahill C, Malatantis G, Nayak RC (1995) Transmission electron microscopic demonstration of vimentin in rat osteoblast and osteocyte cell bodies and processes using the immunogold technique. Anat Rec 241:39-48[Medline]

Sigal MJ, Aubin JE, Ten Cate AR (1985) An immunocytochemical study of the human odontoblast process using antibodies against tubulin, actin, and vimentin. J Dent Res 64:1348-1355[Abstract]

Silva DG, Kailis DG (1972) Ultrastructural studies on the cervical loop and the development of the amelo-dentinal junction in the cat. Arch Oral Biol 17:279-289[Medline]

Sisca RF, Provenza DV (1972) Initial dentin formation in human deciduous teeth. An electron microscope study. Calcif Tissue Res 9:1-16[Medline]

Slavkin HC (1990) Molecular determinants of tooth development: a review. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1:1-16[Medline]

Slavkin HC, Bringas PJ (1976) Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions during odontogenesis. IV. Morphological evidence for direct heterotypic cell-cell contacts. Dev Biol 50:428-442[Medline]

Smith CE, Pompura JR, Borenstein S, Fazel A, Nanci A (1989) Degradation and loss of matrix proteins from developing enamel. Anat Rec 224:292-316[Medline]

Smith CE, Nanci A (1996) The protein dynamics of amelogenesis. Anat Rec 245:219-234[Medline]

Steinert PM, Roop DR (1988) Molecular and cellular biology of intermediate filaments. Annu Rev Biochem 57:593-625[Medline]

Thesleff I, Vaahtokari A, Vainio S, Jowett A (1996) Molecular mechanisms of cell and tissue interactions during early tooth development. Anat Rec 245:151-161[Medline]

Van de Klundert FAJM, Raats JMH, Bloemendal H (1993) Intermediate filaments: regulation of gene expression and assembly. Eur J Biochem 214:351-366[Medline]

Warshawsky H, Moore G (1967) A technique for the fixation and decalcification of rat incisors for electron microscopy. J Histochem Cytochem 15:542-549[Medline]

Webb PP, Moxham BJ, Ralphs JR, Benjamin M (1995) Cytoskeleton of the mesenchymal cells of the rat dental papilla and dental pulp. Connect Tissue Res 32:71-76[Medline]

Wise GE, Lin F, Fan W (1992) Culture and characterization of dental follicle cells from rat molars. Cell Tissue Res 267:483-492[Medline]