Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, Vol. 48, 415-422, March 2000, Copyright © 2000, The Histochemical Society, Inc.


ARTICLE

Expression of Glutamine Synthetase in Macrophages

Johannes Georg Bode1,a, Thorsten Peters–Regehr1,a, Ralf Kubitza, and Dieter Häussingera
a Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie, Heinrich-Heine Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany

Correspondence to: Dieter Häussinger, Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie, Heinrich-Heine Universität, Moorenstr. 5, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.


  Summary
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

We studied the expression of glutamine synthetase in liver macrophages (Kupffer cells, KCs) in situ and in culture. Glutamine synthetase was detectable at the mRNA and protein level in freshly isolated and short-term-cultured rat liver macrophages. Enzyme activity and protein content were about 9% of that in liver parenchymal cells. In contrast, glutamine synthetase mRNA levels in liver macrophages apparently exceeded those in parenchymal liver cells (PCs). By use of confocal laser scanning microscopy and specific macrophage markers, immunoreactive glutamine synthetase was localized to macrophages in normal rat liver and normal human liver in situ. All liver macrophages stained positive for glutamine synthetase. In addition, macrophages in rat pancreas contained immunoreactive glutamine synthetase, whereas glutamine synthetase was not detectable at the mRNA and protein level in blood monocytes and RAW 264.7 mouse macrophages. No significant amounts of glutamine synthetase were found in isolated rat liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (SECs). The data suggest a constitutive expression of glutamine synthetase not only, as previously believed, in perivenous liver parenchymal cells but also in resident liver macrophages. (J Histochem Cytochem 48:415–421, 2000)

Key Words: glutamine metabolism, sinusoidal endothelial cells, monocytes


  Introduction
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

The liver plays an important role in glutamine metabolism, with implications for ammonia and bicarbonate homeostasis (for review see Jungermann and Katz 1989 ; Haussinger et al. 1992 ; Haussinger 1990 , Haussinger 1998 ). In the liver acinus, glutamine synthetase is expressed exclusively in a small subpopulation of perivenous liver parenchymal cells (Gebhardt and Mecke 1983 ; Haussinger 1983 ; Gebhardt et al. 1989 ), and these cells are believed to scavenge the ammonia that escaped upstream urea synthesis (Haussinger 1983 , Haussinger 1990 ). Immunohistochemical studies demonstrated the absence of glutamine synthetase in hepatic nonparenchymal cells (Gebhardt and Mecke 1983 ). These cells, i.e., liver macrophages, sinusoidal endothelial cells, and hepatic stellate cells, make up about one third of all hepatic cells but occupy only 6–8% of total liver cell volume (Daoust 1958 ). Although glutamine synthetase protein and activity are not found in quiescent hepatic stellate cells, the enzyme is expressed after hepatic stellate cell transformation into {alpha}-actin-expressing myofibroblast-like cells (Bode et al. 1998 ).

Recent studies suggested that glutamine is utilized at a high rate by peritoneal macrophages and that the activity of glutaminase is high in these cells (Wu and Flynn 1995 ; Costa Rosa et al. 1996 ; Newsholme and Calder 1997 ). Apparently, glutamine is required in cells of the immune system to maintain high intracellular concentrations of intermediates required for optimal cell proliferation, phagocytosis, and synthesis and release of cytokines (Ardawi and Newsholme 1983 ; Souba et al. 1990 ; Abcouwer et al. 1996 ; Newsholme and Calder 1997 ). However, nothing is known about glutamine synthetase expression in macrophages. Here we studied the expression of glutamine synthetase in liver and pancreas macrophages, RAW 264.7 mouse macrophages, and blood monocytes.


  Materials and Methods
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Animals
Male Wistar rats were used in all experiments. All rats were raised in the local institute for laboratory animals and held, fed ad libitum on stock diet, according to the local ethical guidelines. GS immunohistochemistry was performed on cryosections from normal liver and pancreas of four different animals.

Materials
RPMI 1640 and DMEM medium, glutamine, and fetal calf serum were from Biochrom (Berlin, Germany). Nycodenz was from Nycomed (Oslo, Norway). Pronase was from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). DNase I and collagenase were from Boehringer Mannheim (Mannheim, Germany). FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgG, chicken serum albumin, and L-{gamma}-glutamyl-hydroxamate were obtained from Sigma (Deisenhofen, Germany). Anti-glutamine synthetase antibody from mouse was from Chemicon International (Harrow, UK). Anti-glutamine synthetase antibody from goat was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Heidelberg, Germany). Cy3-conjugated anti-goat IgG (Fab fragment) was obtained from Dianova (Hamburg, Germany). Anti-ED2 antibody and anti-human mature macrophage antibody (MCA1122) from mouse were from Serotec (Raleigh, NC). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody was from BioRad (Hercules, CA). RNeasy total RNA kit was obtained from Qiagen (Hilden, Germany). The glutamine synthetase cDNA fragment used for detection of glutamine synthetase mRNA was kindly provided by Dr. W.H. Lamers (University of Amsterdam, Netherlands). The 1.0-kb cDNA fragment for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), which was used for standardization, was from Clontech (Heidelberg, Germany). Nitrocellulose membranes were purchased from Schleicher & Schuell (Dassel, Germany). {alpha}-[32P]-dCTP was from Amersham (Braunschweig, Germany). Polybead fluorescent microspheres (2.5% solid latex, 1.1 µm diameter) were obtained from Polysciences (St. Goar, Germany). All other chemicals were from Merck.

Isolation and Cultivation of Kupffer Cells and Sinusoidal Endothelial Cells
Cells were isolated from 1-year-old male Wistar rats by collagenase–pronase perfusion and separated by a single Nycodenz gradient and centrifugal elutriation (Eyhorn et al. 1988 ). Kupffer cells (KCs) were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS) and 1% gentamycin for up to 48 hr.

Sinusoidal endothelial cells (SECs) were plated on collagen 1-coated culture dishes and maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS and 1% gentamycin for 24 hr.

Culture medium was changed after 24 hr. Culture was performed in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air at 37C. Purity of KCs was >=98% as assessed 1–48 hr after seeding by their typical light microscopic appearance, by immunological staining for ED2 (specific macrophages marker protein) (Shi et al. 1996 ), and by their ability to phagocytose fluorescent 1.1-µm latex particles. Purity of SECs was >=80% as assessed 24 hr after seeding by their typical light microscopic appearance and by their inability to phagocytose fluorescent 1.1-µm latex particles.

Isolation of Blood Monocytes
Monocytes were isolated from the blood of 1-year-old male Wistar rats. The peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from blood by centrifugation on Ficoll–Hypaque as described (Boyum 1968 ). Cells were washed twice in PBS without Ca2+ and Mg2+. Cells were resuspended in medium, layered on top of a continuous Percoll gradient, and centrifuged for 5 min at 400 x g. Afterwards, the supernatant with contaminating platelets was removed. Monocytes were isolated by adherence on polystyrol for 60 min, followed by three washes with PBS to remove nonadherent cells (Wahl and Smith 1995 ). Purity was controlled by unspecific esterase staining as described (Li et al. 1973 ).

Isolation and Cultivation of Parenchymal Cells from Rat Liver
Isolated parenchymal cells (PCs) were prepared from livers of 5–8-week-old male Wistar rats by a collagenase perfusion technique as described (Meijer et al. 1975 ). Cells were plated on collagen-coated culture dishes and maintained in Krebs–Henseleit medium supplemented with 6 mmol/liter glucose in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air at 37C. After 2 hr, medium was removed and the culture was continued for 24 hr in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 5% FCS, penicillin/streptomycin, 0.1 mg/ml, insulin 100 nmol/liter, dexamethasone 100 nmol/liter, Na-selenite 30 nmol/liter, and aprotinin 1 µg/ml.

Culture of RAW 264.7 Cells
The murine peritoneal macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 was maintained in DME medium at 37C in 5% CO2, supplemented with 10% FCS, and 1% gentamycin, and were grown to near confluency before experiments were performed.

Determination of Glutamine Synthetase Expression
Cells were harvested in a buffer containing 63 mmol/liter Tris-HCl (pH 6.8) and 1% SDS. Protein content of the lysate was determined according to Bradford 1976 , using a commercially available reagent from BioRad. The cell lysate was mixed 2:1 with gel loading buffer containing 300 mmol/liter dithiothreitol (DTT, pH 6.8). After boiling for 5 min, the proteins were subjected to SDS gel electrophoresis (30 µg of protein per lane, 7.5% gel). After electrophoresis, gels were equilibrated with transfer buffer [39 mmol/liter glycine, 48 mmol/liter Tris base, 0.03% SDS, 20% methanol (v/v)]. Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes using a semidry transfer apparatus (Pharmacia; Freiburg, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Blots were blocked in 5% BSA containing 20 mmol/liter Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mmol/liter NaCI, 0.1% Tween-20 (TBST) and then incubated at 4C overnight with mouse anti-glutamine synthetase antibody (1:1000). After washing with TBST and incubation with horseradish peroxidase-coupled anti-mouse IgG antibody (dilution 1:10,000) at room temperature (RT) for 2 hr, the blot was washed extensively and developed using enhanced chemiluminescent detection (Amersham). Blots were exposed to Kodak X-OMAT AR-5 film (Eastman Kodak; Rochester, NY) for 1–10 min.

Determination of Glutamine Synthetase Activity
Cells were cultured for the time period indicated, harvested by scraping in distilled water, and homogenized by sonication for 4 sec at 4C. Glutamine synthetase activity was measured according to the method described in Ward and Bradford 1979 but without Triton. Aliquots of 60 µl of homogenate were incubated with 50 µl of reaction mixture at 37C. The final concentrations used were as follows: 100 mmol/liter imidazole buffer (pH 7.2), 12.5 mmol/liter MgCl2, 10 mmol/liter sodium ATP, 50 mmol/liter potassium glutamate, 20 mmol/liter ß-mercaptoethanol, 1 mmol/liter ouabain, 13 mmol/liter phosphoenolpyruvate, 100 mmol/ liter hydroxylamine (freshly neutralized to pH 7.2 with KOH), and 5 U/ml pyruvate kinase. Reaction was stopped after the time period indicated by adding 250 µl of a fresh mixture containing 500 mmol/liter FeCl3, 400 mmol/liter perchloric acid, and 400 mmol/liter HCl. After 20–30-min incubation on ice, the protein precipitate was sedimented by centrifugation at 20,000 x g and 4C for 10 min. The optical density of the supernatant was measured at 492 nm. Standard curves were established using L-{gamma}-glutamyl-hydroxamate. Values are expressed as µmol L-{gamma}-glutamyl-hydroxamate formed per hour per mg of protein at 37C. The reaction was tested for linearity and dependence on the protein concentration employed.

Fluorescence Staining of Glutamine Synthetase
For immunocytochemistry, KCs and ECs were cultured on glass coverslips with a diameter of 10 mm at a density of 0.25 x 106 cells/coverslip. At the end of culture time (0–48 hr), cells were fixed with methanol for 10 min at 4C. Cryosectioning and staining of cryosections for immunofluorescence were performed as previously described by Kubitz et al. 1997 . Cryosections of normal human liver were obtained from explants after surgery on benign or malignant liver tumors. This procedure is in accordance with German ethical regulations. Cryosections of rat liver, rat pancreas, or human liver were fixed with methanol for 10 min at 4C.

After rinsing twice with PBS, the methanol-fixed samples were incubated in PBS containing 0.1% Triton for 10 min at RT. The cells were washed again and incubated for at least 3 hr at RT with goat anti-glutamine synthetase antibody (1:25) plus mouse anti-ED2 (for rat) antibody (1:50) or mouse antibody against human mature macrophages (1:250) in a wet chamber. Then the cells were washed with PBS and incubation was continued for 2 hr with Cy3-conjugated anti-goat immunoglobulin (1:300) plus FITC-conjugated anti-mouse immunoglobulin (1:100). To rule out false positivity, negative controls were done by incubation of samples with either the combination of secondary antibodies alone or with each single first antibody together with both secondary antibodies. Microscopy was performed using a confocal laser scanning system (argon–krypton laser; Leica, Bensheim, Germany).

Northern Blot Analysis
Total RNA from cultured cells was isolated by using the RNeasy total RNA Kit (Qiagen). RNA samples (2 µg per lane) were electrophoresed in 0.8% agarose containing 3% formaldehyde and then blotted onto Hybond-N nylon membranes (Amersham) with 20 x SSC (3 mol/liter NaCl/0.3 mol/liter Na-citrate). After brief rinsing with water and UV crosslinking (Hoefer UV-crosslinker 500), the membranes were observed under UV illumination to determine RNA integrity and location of the 28 S and 18 S rRNA bands. The blots were then subjected to prehybridization for 3 hr at 43C in 50% deionized formamide in sodium phosphate buffer (0.25 mol/liter; pH 7.2) containing 0.25 mol/liter NaCl, 1 mmol/liter EDTA, 100 mg/ml salmon sperm DNA, and 7% SDS. Hybridization was carried out in the same solution with approximately 106 cpm/ml [{alpha}-32P]-dCTP-labeled random-primed glutamine synthetase and GAPDH cDNA probes. Membranes were washed three times in 2 x SSC/0.1% SDS for 10 min, twice in sodium phosphate buffer (25 mmol/liter; pH 7.2)/EDTA (1 mmol/liter)/0.1% SDS, and twice in sodium phosphate buffer (25 mmol/liter; pH 7.2)/ EDTA (1 mmol/liter)/1% SDS. Blots were then exposed to Kodak X-OMAT AR-5 film at -70C with intensifying screens.

Suitably exposed autoradiographs were then analyzed by densitometry scanning (PDI; New York, NY). Relative glutamine synthetase mRNA levels were determined by standardization to the absorption of GAPDH mRNA.

Analysis of Results
Values are expressed as means ± SEM (n=3–6). Results of at least three independent experiments are given. For statistical analysis the one-way analysis of variance was performed using the one-way ANOVA test. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.


  Results
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Glutamine Synthetase in Liver Macrophages
As shown in Fig 1A and Fig 1B, glutamine synthetase mRNA and protein were detectable in isolated rat liver parenchymal cells and liver macrophages. The amount of GS protein in KCs was only about 9% of the amount found in isolated PCs. In line with this, specific GS activity in isolated PCs and KCs was 0.56 ± 0.03 (n=4) and 0.06 ± 0.01 µmol/hr/mg protein (n=4), respectively. In contrast, GS mRNA levels in KCs apparently exceeded those in PCs. Culture of KCs for 2 days had no effect on GS protein and mRNA levels. However, the PC preparation used includes GS-positive (pericentral) as well as GS-negative (periportal) cells. Because the GS mRNA content in pericentral PCs is about 20-fold higher than in periportal PCs (Gebhardt et al. 1996 ), the GS mRNA levels in KCs and in GS-positive pericentral PCs may be similar.



View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Glutamine synthetase mRNA (A) and protein (B) in various cell types. (A) Cells were harvested for RNA after the time period indicated and subjected to Northern blot analysis for glutamine synthetase (GS) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). The position of the 28S (~4.7 kb) and 18S (~1.9 kb) ribosomal RNA band is depicted at right. (B) For Western blot analysis, an antibody specifically raised against glutamine synthetase was used. KC, rat Kupffer cells; MC, rat blood monocytes; PC, rat parenchymal cells; SEC, rat sinusoidal endothelial cells; RAW: RAW 264.7 mouse macrophages.

Immunocytochemical studies on freshly isolated KCs or on KCs kept for 2 days in culture revealed co-localization of GS and ED2, a specific macrophage marker protein (Fig 2A and Fig 2B). GS was present in all KCs and not only in subpopulations thereof. GS was also detectable in KCs in situ. In sections from rat liver tissue, intense staining for GS was found in the perivenous hepatocytes surrounding the terminal hepatic venules, but punctate staining was also found throughout the parenchyma, with some enrichment in the periportal areas. Counterstaining with the macrophage-specific antibody against ED2 revealed that the punctate GS-positive staining co-localized with ED2 (Fig 2D), suggestive of a localization of GS in macrophages. In line with previous results (Grinko et al. 1995 ), KCs (ED2 positivity) were enriched in the periportal area (Fig 2E). In sections from normal human liver (Fig 2F), glutamine synthetase was also detectable in liver macrophages.



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Glutamine synthetase expression in vivo. Cryosections from rat or human livers and rat pancreas, and immunocytochemical staining of Kupffer cells (KCs) and sinusoidal endothelial cells (SECs), were performed and double-stained as described in Materials and Methods section. Specific markers: macrophages (green); glutamine synthetase (red); co-localization, glutamine synthetase (GS) and specific marker for macrophages (yellow). In C, the last picture was taken by phase-contrast microscopy to prove the existence of SECs. (A) Freshly isolated KCs; (B) rat KCs after 2 days culture; (C) rat KCs and SECs in culture (1 day); (D,E) normal rat liver; (F) human liver; (G) macrophages of rat pancreas. KC, Kupffer cells; PC, parenchymal cells; SEC, sinusoidal endothelial cells. Bars: AD,F,G = 10 µm; E = 100 µm.

GS in Other Macrophages and Sinusoidal Endothelial Cells
In mouse RAW 264.7 macrophages and blood monocytes, neither GS protein nor GS mRNA was detectable (Fig 1). However, immunohistochemistry of rat pancreas revealed the presence of GS in pancreas macrophages (Fig 2G).

Only small amounts of GS protein and mRNA were found in isolated SECs (Fig 1), and no GS activity was detectable. At the immunocytochemical level, which allowed the differentiation of SECs from contamination of KCs by simultaneous use of the ED2 antibody, no staining for GS was detectable in SECs (Fig 2C). The amounts of GS protein and mRNA found in SEC preparations were only about 17% of the amounts found in isolated KCs. Because our SEC preparation contained 15–20% KCs, our findings suggest that SECs do not contain GS protein or mRNA and that the signals found in Fig 1 are due to contaminating KCs.


  Discussion
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

This study demonstrates a constitutive expression of glutamine synthetase in liver macrophages. This was shown at the level of mRNA and of protein and enzyme activity as well as by immunohistochemistry and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Kupffer cell-associated GS showed some enrichment in the periportal area of the liver lobule due to the known higher amount of KCs in periportal compared to perivenous areas (Grinko et al. 1995 ). Although KCs from different sublobular origins appeared to exhibit a slightly different morphology, no qualitative zonal difference with respect to GS was found in periportal and perivenous KCs. The physiological role of GS in KCs remains to be established. However, quantitative estimates suggest that KC-associated GS may not play a major role in overall hepatic ammonia disposal. This conclusion is based on the findings that, on an mg/protein basis, specific GS activity in KCs is only 9% of that in PCs and that KCs comprise less than 5% of total cell volume in liver. Therefore, the fraction of GS in normal liver that can be attributed to KCs will be less than 1%. After liver injury or cirrhosis, however, when the hepatic GS activity drops to values below 20% of control (Haussinger et al. 1992 ), KCs and, as shown previously, transformed hepatic stellate cells (Bode et al. 1998 ) may contribute significantly to total hepatic glutamine synthesis.

Our data further indicate that there are differences in the ratio of GS mRNA to protein and specific activity between KCs and PCs (Fig 1). This might be explained by differences in the regulatory mechanisms for expression or degradation of GS and GS mRNA in these cell types. With respect to the enhanced oxidative metabolism resulting from the activation of macrophages (Murray and Cohn 1980 ), it might be important to mention that the oxidative modification of the GS protein caused a dramatic increase in its susceptibility to proteolytic degradation by cytosolic proteases (Rivett 1985 ). Therefore, the relatively low concentration of GS protein in cultured liver macrophages might be due to enhanced degradation, leading to increased transcription in order to maintain constant levels of GS activity.

Expression of GS does not appear to be a feature of macrophages in general, as blood monocytes and RAW 264.7 peritoneal mouse macrophages contain neither GS protein nor GS mRNA. Because not only liver macrophages but also pancreas macrophages contain glutamine synthetase, it is attractive to speculate that GS expression is a feature of sessile tissue macrophages only. However, GS is inducible by corticosteroids (Gaasbeek Janzen et al. 1987 ; Chandrasekhar et al. 1999), growth hormone (Gebhardt and Mecke 1979 ; Nolan et al. 1990 ), and specific cell-to-cell interactions (Kuo and Darnell 1991 ). Therefore, the differences in the expression of GS between resident macrophages of liver and pancreas on the one hand and monocytes on the other may be due to the environment or to the differentiation status of the respective cell type.

GS expression in KCs may relate to the involvement of glutamine in proliferation, phagocytosis and cytokine release by the cells of the immune system (Ardawi and Newsholme 1983 ; Souba et al. 1990 ; Abcouwer et al. 1996 ; Newsholme et al. 1996 ; Walsh et al. 1998 ). In this respect, it is noteworthy that a requirement for glutamine for IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-{alpha}, or NO synthesis and the macrophage-mediated lysis of a ß-cell line has been reported for macrophages stimulated either by lipopolysaccharide (Wallace and Keast 1992 ; Yassad et al. 1997 ) or by bacillus Calmette–Guérin (Murphy and Newsholme 1998 , Murphy and Newsholme 1999 ). Therefore, one may consider that KCs and other resident macrophages acquired the ability to synthesize glutamine, enabling undisturbed macrophage function under conditions of low blood levels of glutamine. However, further studies are needed to establish the role and the pathophysiological implications of GS for the function of sessile macrophages.


  Footnotes

1 These authors contributed equally to this work.


  Acknowledgments

Supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Gottfried-Wilhelm-Leibniz-Prize.

The GS cDNA fragment used for detection of GS mRNA was kindly provided by Dr W. H. Lamers (University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands).

Received for publication July 14, 1999; accepted October 13, 1999.


  Literature Cited
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Abcouwer SF, Norman J, Fink G, Carter G, Lustig RJ, Souba WW (1996) Tissue-specific regulation of glutamine synthetase gene expression in acute pancreatitis is confirmed by using interleukin-1 receptor knockout mice. Surgery 120:255-264[Medline]

Ardawi MS, Newsholme EA (1983) Glutamine metabolism in lymphocytes of rat. Biochem J 212:835-842[Medline]

Bode JG, Peters–Regehr T, Gressner AM, Häussinger D (1998) De novo expression of glutamine synthetase during transformation of hepatic stellate cells into myofibroblast-like cells. Biochem J 335:697-700[Medline]

Böyum A (1968) Isolation of mononuclear cells and granulocytes from human blood. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 21(suppl 97):77-89[Medline]

Bradford NM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248-254[Medline]

Chandrasekar S, Souba WW, Abcouwer SF (1999) Identification of glucocorticoid-responsive elements that control transcription of rat glutamine synthetase. Am J Physiol 276:L319-331[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Costa Rosa LF, Safi DA, Cury Y, Curi R (1996) The effect of insulin of macrophage metabolism and function. Cell Biochem Funct 14:33-42[Medline]

Daoust R (1958) The cell population of liver tissue and the cytological reference bases. Am Inst Biol Sci Publ 4:3-10

Eyhorn S, Schlayer H-J, Henninger HP, Dieter P, Hermann R, Woort–Menker M, Becker H, Schaefer H-E, Decker K (1988) Rat hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cell in monolayer culture. J Hepatol 6:23-35[Medline]

Gaasbeek Janzen JW, Gebhardt R, ten Voorde GH, Lamers WH, Charles R, Moorman AF (1987) Heterogeneous distribution of glutamine synthetase during rat liver development. J Histochem Cytochem 35:49-54[Abstract]

Gebhardt R, Mecke D (1979) The role of growth hormone, dexamethasone and triiodothyronine in the regulation of glutamine synthetase in primary cultures of rat hepatocytes. Eur J Biochem 100:519-525[Medline]

Gebhardt R, Mecke D (1983) Heterogeneous distribution of glutamine synthetase among rat liver parenchymal cells in situ and in primary culture. EMBO J 2:567-570[Medline]

Gebhardt R, Gaunitz F, Twisk J, Princen H (1996) Posttranscriptional events contribute to the zonated expression of glutamine synthetase in rat liver parenchyma. Eur J Cell Biol 69(suppl 42):87S

Gebhardt R, Schmid H, Fitzke H (1989) Immunohistochemical localization of glutamine synthetase in human liver. Experientia 45:137-139[Medline]

Grinko I, Geerts A, Wisse E (1995) Experimental biliary fibrosis correlates with increased numbers of fat-storing and Kupffer cells, and portal endotoxemia. J Hepatol 23:449-458[Medline]

Häussinger D (1983) Hepatocyte heterogeneity in glutamine and ammonia metabolism and the role of an intercellular glutamine cycle during ureogenesis in perfused rat liver. Eur J Biochem 133:269-275[Abstract]

Häussinger D (1990) Nitrogen metabolism in liver: structural and functional organization and physiological relevance. Biochem J 267:281-290[Medline]

Häussinger D (1998) Hepatic glutamine transport and metabolism. Adv Enzymol RAMB 72:43-86

Häussinger D, Lamers WH, Moormann AFM (1992) Hepatocyte heterogeneity in the metabolism of amino acids and ammonia. Enzyme 46:72-93[Medline]

Jungermann K, Katz N (1989) Functional specialization of different hepatocyte populations. Physiol Rev 69:708-764[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kubitz R, D'Urso D, Keppler D, Häussinger D (1997) Osmodependent dynamic localization of the multidrug resitance protein 2 in the rat hepatocyte canalicular membrane. Gastroenterology 113:1438-1442[Medline]

Kuo FC, Darnell JE, Jr (1991) Evidence that interaction of hepatocytes with the collecting (hepatic) veins triggers position specific transcription of the glutamine synthetase and ornithine aminotransferase genes in the mouse liver. Mol Cell Biol 11:6050-6058[Medline]

Li CY, Lam KW, Yam LT (1973) Esterases in human leukocytes. J Histochem Cytochem 21:1-12[Medline]

Meijer AJ, Gimpel JA, Deleeuw GA, Tager JM, Williamson JR (1975) Role of anion translocation across the mitochondrial membrane in the regulation of urea synthesis from ammonia by isolated rat hepatocytes. J Biol Chem 250:7728-7738[Abstract]

Murphy C, Newsholme P (1998) Importance of glutamine metabolism in murine macrophages and human monocytes to L-arginine biosynthesis and rates of nitrite and urea production. Clin Sci 95:397-407[Medline]

Murphy C, Newsholme P (1999) Macrophage-mediated lysis of a ß-cell line, tumour necrosis factor-{alpha} release from bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-activated murine macrophages and interleukin-8 release from human monocytes are dependent on extracellular glutamine concentration and glutamine metabolism. Clin Sci 96:89-97[Medline]

Murray HW, Cohn ZA (1980) Macrophage oxygen dependent antimicrobial activity. III. Enhanced oxidative metabolism as an expression of macrophage activation. J Exp Med 152:1596-1609[Abstract]

Newsholme EA, Calder PC (1997) The proposed role of glutamine in some cells of the immune system and speculative consequences for the whole animal. Nutrition 13:728-730[Medline]

Newsholme P, Costa Rosa LF, Newsholme EA, Curi R (1996) The importance of fuel metabolism for macrophage function. Cell Biochem Funct 14:1-10[Medline]

Nolan ME, Masters JN, Dunn A (1990) Growth hormone regulation of hepatic glutamine synthetase mRNA levels in rats. Mol Cell Endocrinol 69:101-110[Medline]

Rivett AJ (1985) Preferential degradation of the oxidatively modified form of glutamine synthetase by intracellular mammalian proteases. J Biol Chem 260:300-305[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shi J, Fujieda H, Kokubo Y, Wake K (1996) Apoptosis of neutrophils and their elimination by Kupffer cells in rat liver. Hepatology 24:1256-1263[Medline]

Souba WW, Klimberg VS, Plumley DA, Salloum RM, Flynn TC, Bland KI, Copeland EM (1990) The role of glutamine in maintaining a healthy gut and supporting the metabolic response to injury and infection. J Surg Res 48:383-391[Medline]

Wahl LM, Smith PD (1995) Current Protocols in Immunology. Vol 2. New York, John Wiley & Sons

Wallace C, Keast D (1992) Glutamine and macrophage function. Metabolism 41:1016-1020[Medline]

Walsh NP, Blannin AK, Robson PJ, Gleeson M (1998) Glutamine, exercise and immune function. Links and possible mechanism. Sports Med 26:177-191[Medline]

Ward HK, Bradford HF (1979) Relative activities of glutamine synthetase and glutaminase in mammalian synaptosomes. J Neurochem 33:339-342[Medline]

Wu G, Flynn NE (1995) Regulation of glutamine and glucose metabolism by cell volume in lymphocytes and macrophages. Biochim Biophys Acta 1243:343-350[Medline]

Yassad A, Lavoinne A, Bion A, Daveau M, Husson A (1997) Glutamine accelerates interleukin-6 production by rat peritoneal macrophages in culture. FEBS Lett 413:81-84[Medline]





This Article
Abstract
Full Text (PDF)
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Citation Map
Services
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Articles by Bode, J. G.
Articles by Häussinger, D.
Articles citing this Article
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Bode, J. G.
Articles by Häussinger, D.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]