ARTICLE |
Correspondence to: Masahito Oyamada, Dept. of Pathology and Cell Regulation, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan. E-mail: oyamada@basic.kpu-m.ac.jp
![]() |
Summary |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
To elucidate whether the two different gap junction proteins connexin43 (Cx43) and connexin26 (Cx26) are expressed and localized in a similar manner in the adult rat cochlea, we performed three-dimensional confocal microscopy using cryosections and surface preparations. In the cochlear lateral wall, Cx43-positive spots were localized mainly in the stria vascularis and only a few spots were present in the spiral ligament, whereas Cx26-positive spots were detected in both the stria vascularis and the spiral ligament. In the spiral limbus, Cx43 was widely distributed, whereas Cx26 was more concentrated on the side facing the scala vestibuli and in the basal portion. In the organ of Corti, Cx43-positive spots were present between the supporting cells but they were fewer and much smaller than those of Cx26. These data demonstrated distinct differences between Cx43 and Cx26 in expression and localization in the cochlea. In addition, the area of overlap of zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) immunolabeling with Cx43-positive spots was small, whereas it was fairly large with Cx26-positive spots in the cochlear lateral wall, suggesting that the differences are not associated with the structural difference between carboxyl terminals, i.e., those of Cx43 possess sequences for binding to ZO-1, whereas those of Cx26 lack these binding sequences. (J Histochem Cytochem 51:903912, 2003)
Key Words: cochlea, confocal microscopy, connexin, gap junctions, stria vascularis, spiral ligament, spiral limbus, organ of Corti, ZO-1
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
GAP JUNCTIONS are intercellular channels that mediate direct transfer of low molecular weight (less than about 1,000 Daltons) metabolites, ions, and small molecules between neighboring cells. Because some second messengers in signal transduction can pass through gap junction channels, gap junctional intercellular communication is considered to play an important role in tissue homeostasis, growth control, and cell differentiation (
In the cochlea, gap junctions were detected by electron microscopy (
The purpose of this study was to determine whether the two different connexins, Cx43 and Cx26, are expressed and localized in a similar manner in the cochlea. For this purpose, we performed three-dimensional (3-D) analysis on the expression and localization of Cx43 and Cx26 in the adult rat cochlea using two types of prepared samples, i.e., cryosections and surface preparations, in combination with confocal microscopy. The results indicated that the expression and localization of Cx43 differed from those of Cx26. Therefore, we further investigated whether this difference was associated with the expression and localization of zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1), because the carboxyl terminals of Cx43 have been shown to be bound with ZO-1 (
![]() |
Materials and Methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Animals
A total of 20 adult male Wistar rats free of middle ear infection were used. The animals were perfused transcardially with freshly prepared 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4, 4C) under deep pentobarbital anesthesia, and the temporal bones were removed bilaterally. The cochlear lateral walls, spiral limbus, and the organ of Corti were dissected out under a dissection microscope and placed in the same fixative at 4C for 1 hr. Two types of sample preparations, i.e., cryosections and surface preparations, were made for immunolabeling. For cryosections of the cochlear lateral wall and spiral limbus, the specimens were infused with Tissue-Tek OCT compound (Miles; Elkhart, IN), frozen in disposable vinyl specimen molds (Tissue-Tek Cryomold; Miles) by partial immersion in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80C. Serial 14-µm frozen sections were cut with a cryostat microtome (CRYOCUT 1800; Reichert-Jung, Heidelberg, Germany) and placed on silane-coated slides (Matsunami; Osaka, Japan). For surface preparations, the stria vascularis was gently separated from the spiral ligament under a dissection microscope and placed on silane-coated slides so that the marginal cell layer or the basal cell layer was in contact with the surface of the slides. Surface preparations of the organ of Corti were placed on the slides so that the side of the basilar membrane was in contact with the surface of the slides. All animal experiments described in this study adhered to the standards detailed in "Principles of Laboratory Animal Care" (NIH publication no. 85 23, revised 1985) and were approved by the Committee for Animal Research, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine.
Immunohistochemistry
The specimens on the slides were air-dried and fixed in absolute ethanol at -20C for 15 min. After incubation in PBS with 5% skim milk for 15 min at room temperature to block nonspecific labeling, primary antibodies, including a mouse monoclonal antibody against Cx26 (1:200 dilution; Zymed Laboratories, South San Francisco, CA), a rabbit polyclonal antibody against a Cx26-specific peptide (amino acid residues 101119; 1:2000 dilution) (
Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy
The immunostained slides of cryosections and surface preparations were observed with a confocal laser scanning microscope (Olympus FLUOVIEW system; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an oil-immersion objective (Plan Apo x60, NA = 1.4; Olympus). An argonkrypton laser produced excitation bands at 488 nm for Alexa 488 and 568 nm for Alexa 594 and Texas Red-X. Fluorescence images were collected with emission filters for 510550 nm for Alexa 488 and 585610 nm for Alexa 594 and Texas Red-X. Simultaneous images (800 x 600 pixels, 12 bits each) of the Alexa 488 label and either Alexa 594 or Texas Red-X were acquired and stored. Three-dimensional analysis was done by acquiring a 2-D image at each of more than 10 adjacent focus planes that were 1, 1.5, or 2 µm apart within the specimen by driving a focus motor. This was ultimately viewed as a stereo pair made by projecting the data along two axes about 10° apart. Digital images were transferred to a Macintosh computer (Apple Computer; Cuperino, CA) equipped with the Photoshop Program (Adobe Systems; Tucson, AZ) and printed on an ink-jet printer (PM-3500C; Epson, Tokyo, Japan). A total of 40 cochleas were analyzed.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Cx43 and Cx26 in Cochlear Lateral Wall
The localization of Cx43 was notably different from that of Cx26 in the cochlear lateral wall of adult rats. In cryostat sections under low magnification, immunolabeling for Cx43 using the rabbit anti-Cx43 antibody (Zymed) showed that Cx43-immunolabeled spots were localized mainly in the stria vascularis, but a few spots were also observed on the lateral side of the spiral ligament (Fig 1A and Fig 1C). In contrast, Cx26 immunolabeling using the mouse monoclonal anti-Cx26 antibody (Zymed) was detected not only in the stria vascularis but also throughout the spiral ligament (Fig 1B and Fig 1C), consistent with the result of our previous study (
|
To ascertain the precise localization of Cx43 and Cx26 in the stria vascularis, we performed double labeling using rabbit anti-Cx43 (Zymed) or rabbit anti-Cx26 antibody (
To examine the relationship between Cx43 and Cx26 in the cochlear lateral wall, we carried out double immunolabeling using rabbit anti-Cx43 (Zymed) and mouse anti-Cx26 (Zymed) antibodies in the cryostat sections and 3-D analysis using serial confocal images. Stereo pairs reconstructed from serial confocal images demonstrated that Cx43 was localized within the stria vascularis, whereas Cx26 was present in the stria vascularis and spiral ligament (Fig 1F). In addition, yellow spots were found in the stria vascularis, indicating co-localization of Cx43 and Cx26.
To further investigate the co-localization of Cx43 and Cx26 in the stria vascularis, we carried out 3-D analysis of double immunolabeling using the rabbit anti-Cx43 (Zymed) and mouse anti-Cx26 (Zymed) antibodies and surface preparations, in which the surfaces of the marginal cells were viewed from the side facing the endolymphatic space. Serial confocal images, in which the planes were 1 µm apart, showed that a substantial proportion of the immunolabeled spots were yellow, confirming co-localization of Cx43 and Cx26 (Fig 2). However, many immunolabeled spots were not yellow, but were either green or red, indicating that separate localization of Cx43 and Cx26 predominated over the co-localization, especially on the basal side.
|
Identical results for the localization of Cx43 and Cx26 in the cochlear lateral wall were obtained with different antibodies against Cx43 and Cx26, including mouse anti-Cx43 (Chemicon) and rabbit anti-Cx26 (
Cx43 and Cx26 in the Spiral Limbus
Differences between the localization of Cx43 and that of Cx26 were also found in the spiral limbus. Using the rabbit anti-Cx43 and mouse anti-Cx26 antibodies, we found that Cx43-positive spots were widely distributed in the spiral limbus (Fig 3A). On the other hand, Cx26-positive spots were more concentrated on the side facing the scala vestibuli and in the basal portion of the spiral limbus, although some Cx26-positive spots were detected in the apical portion of the spiral limbus (Fig 3B). Merged images showed that Cx43 and Cx26 were sometimes co-localized in the spiral limbus (Fig 3C). With non-immune rabbit and mouse sera, nonspecific fluorescence was barely detected in the spiral limbus (Fig 3D).
|
Cx43 and Cx26 in the Organ of Corti
Cx43-positive spots were clearly detected between several types of supporting cells. Although precise identification of the supporting cells was not possible in this study, Cx43-positive cells appeared to include at least the inner and outer phalangeal cells and Hensen's cells. The Cx43-positive spots were fewer and smaller than the Cx26-positive spots. Double labeling using Alexa 488-conjugated phalloidin and the mouse anti-Cx26 antibody revealed that inner and outer pillar cells, as well as the cell boundaries between outer hair cells and outer phalangeal cells, were strongly stained with Alexa 488-conjugated phalloidin and that many Cx26-positive spots were localized among supporting cells (Fig 4A). Stereo paired images of immunolabeling using the rabbit anti-Cx43 and mouse anti-Cx26 antibodies showed that Cx43-positive spots were distributed adjacent to more abundant Cx26-positive spots and that some Cx43-positive spots were co-localized with Cx26-positive spots (Fig 4B and Fig 4C). With non-immune rabbit and mouse sera, nonspecific fluorescence was barely detected in the organ of Corti (Fig 4D).
|
ZO-1, Cx43, and Cx26 in the Cochlear Lateral Wall
ZO-1 has been shown to be bound with the carboxyl terminals of Cx43 (
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In this study we provide evidence that the expression and localization of Cx43 are different from those of Cx26 in the adult rat cochlea, although there is some overlap between them, and that Cx43 and Cx26 are occasionally co-localized. The difference was demonstrated in three distinct regions of the cochlea, i.e., the cochlear lateral wall, spiral limbus, and organ of Corti. In the cochlear lateral wall, we found that Cx43-positive spots were localized mainly in the stria vascularis, but a few spots were present in the spiral ligament, whereas Cx26-positive spots were detected in both the stria vascularis and spiral ligament. In the spiral limbus, Cx43-positive spots were widely distributed, whereas Cx26-positive spots were more concentrated on the side facing the scala vestibuli and in the basal portion of the spiral limbus. In the organ of Corti, Cx43-positive spots were present between the supporting cells (the inner and outer phalangeal cells and Hensen's cells), similarly to Cx26-positive spots. However, the Cx43-positive spots in the supporting cells of the organ of Corti were much smaller and fewer than the Cx26-positive spots.
Our results also indicate that the differences between the expression and localization of Cx43 and those of Cx26 in the cochlea are not associated with their difference in structure, i.e., the carboxyl terminals of Cx43 possess sequences for binding to ZO-1, whereas those of Cx26 do not. Our results for double immunolabeling for ZO-1 and either Cx43 and Cx26 in the cochlear lateral wall demonstrated only a small area of overlap of ZO-1-immunolabeling with Cx43-positive spots, whereas there was a fairly large area of overlap with Cx26-positive spots in the basal cell layer of the stria vascularis and the spiral ligament, in discord with our hypothesis that the localization of ZO-1 accords with that of Cx43 more closely than with that of Cx26. In turn, the overlap of ZO-1 and Cx26 does not necessary imply functional association of these proteins because the abundance of the two proteins would also increase the probability of their overlap. It therefore remains to be determined whether the overlap of ZO-1 and Cx26 has any physiological or functional significance in the cochlear lateral wall.
The present study elucidated Cx43 localization in the rat cochlea. We demonstrated here that Cx43 was localized in the stria vascularis, spiral limbus, and supporting cells in the organ of Corti. Formerly, no reliable information was available about the expression and localization of Cx43 in the cochlea.
Our finding that the expression and localization of Cx43 differ from those of Cx26 in the adult rat cochlea indicates that gap junctions in the different regions of the cochlea are composed of multiple connexins in different combinations and/or proportions. The diversity of connexins in the cochlea that we found here is consistent with that reported by
A recent study on mutant mice with hearing loss caused by target ablation of Cx26 in the cochlear epithelial gap junction network has shown that cell death initially affected only the supporting cells of the inner hair cells (
The difference in expression and localization between Cx43 and Cx26 also suggests that the target cells for hearing loss caused by mutations of different connexins would not be the same. On the assumption that the expression and localization of Cx43 in the rat are similar to those in the human cochlea, the small number and size of Cx43-positive spots in the organ of Corti, combined with the substantial expression of Cx43 in the stria vascularis and spiral limbus, might indicate that the target cells for human non-syndromic deafness associated with mutations in Cx43 (
Our present study revealed that Cx43 and Cx26 are occasionally co-localized in the cochlea, especially in the stria vascularis. E42). They also demonstrated that the mutant Cx26 significantly inhibits not only intercellular conductance of co-expressed wild-type Cx26 but also that of wild-type Cx43, i.e., trans-dominant inhibition of Cx43 by the mutant Cx26. Our data showing co-localization of Cx43 and Cx26 in the stria vascularis suggest that such a trans-dominant inhibition of Cx43 by mutant Cx26 also occurs in the stria vascularis and plays some role in the pathogenesis of hearing loss. On the other hand, in the organ of Corti, it appears that most Cx43 and Cx26 is not incorporated into the same gap junctions, although some Cx43-positive spots were co-localized with Cx26-positive spots. This is because the number, size, and shape of the immunolabeled puncta were dramatically different between Cx43 and Cx26, i.e., Cx43 immmunolabeling showed a small number of tiny, round, particulate, and separate structures, whereas Cx26 immunolabeling demonstrated a great number of large and extended structures.
In conclusion, we successfully demonstrated the expression and localization of Cx43 in the adult rat cochlea using confocal microscopy and two types of sample preparations. The expression and localization of Cx43 differed from those of Cx26 in the adult rat cochlea, although there was some overlap between them and co-localization of Cx43 and Cx26 was occasionally found.
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
Supported by grants-in-aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan.
We gratefully acknowledge the generous gift of the polyclonal anti-connexin26 antibody from Prof Y. Shibata (Kyushu University School of Medicine; Fukuoka, Japan).
We are also grateful to Dr Y. Oyamada for helpful discussion and critical reading and to Ms Ramona Ratliff for advice on English usage.
Received for publication October 14, 2002; accepted February 5, 2003.
![]() |
Literature Cited |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Beyer EC, Paul DL, Goodenough DA (1990) Connexin family of gap junction proteins. J Membr Biol 116:187-194[Medline]
Bruzzone R, White TW, Paul DL (1996) Connections with connexins: the molecular basis of direct intercellular signaling. Eur J Biochem 238:1-27[Abstract]
CohenSalmon M, Ott T, Michel V, Hardelin JP, Perfettini I, Eybalin M, Wu T et al. (2002) Targeted ablation of connexin26 in the inner ear epithelial gap junction network causes hearing impairment and cell death. Curr Biol 12:1106-1111[Medline]
Forge A (1984) Gap junctions in the stria vascularis and effects of ethacrynic acid. Hear Res 13:189-200[Medline]
Giepmans BN, Moolenaar WH (1998) The gap junction protein connexin43 interacts with the second PDZ domain of the zona occludens-1 protein. Curr Biol 8:931-934[Medline]
Goodenough DA, Goliger JA, Paul DL (1996) Connexins, connexons, and intercellular communication. Annu Rev Biochem 65:475-502[Medline]
Grifa A, Wagner CA, D'Ambrosio L, Melchionda S, Bernardi F, LopezBigas N, Rabionet R et al. (1999) Mutations in GJB6 cause nonsyndromic autosomal dominant deafness at DFNA3 locus. Nature Genet 23:16-18[Medline]
Jahnke K (1975) The fine structure of freeze-fractured intercellular junctions in the guinea pig inner ear. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh) 336:1-40[Medline]
Kelsell DP, Dunlop J, Stevens HP, Lench NJ, Liang JN, Parry G, Mueller RF et al. (1997) Connexin 26 mutations in hereditary non-syndromic sensorineural deafness. Nature 387:80-83[Medline]
Kikuchi T, Kimura RS, Paul DL, Adams JC (1995) Gap junctions in the rat cochlea: immunohistochemical and ultrastructural analysis. Anat Embryol (Berl) 191:101-118[Medline]
Kumar NM, Gilula NB (1996) The gap junction communication channel. Cell 84:381-388[Medline]
Kuraoka A, Iida H, Hatae T, Shibata Y, Itoh M, Kurita T (1993) Localization of gap junction proteins, connexins 32 and 26, in rat and guinea pig liver as revealed by quick-freeze, deep-etch immunoelectron microscopy. J Histochem Cytochem 41:971-980
Laing JG, ManleyMarkowski RN, Koval M, Civitelli R, Steinberg TH (2001) Connexin45 interacts with zonula occludens-1 and connexin43 in osteoblastic cells. J Biol Chem 276:23051-23055
Lautermann J, ten Cate WJ, Altenhoff P, Grummer R, Traub O, Frank H, Jahnke K et al. (1998) Expression of the gap-junction connexins 26 and 30 in the rat cochlea. Cell Tissue Res 294:415-420[Medline]
Liu XZ, Xia XJ, Adams J, Chen ZY, Welch KO, Tekin M, Ouyang XM et al. (2001) Mutations in GJA1 (connexin 43) are associated with non-syndromic autosomal recessive deafness. Hum Mol Genet 10:2945-2951
Liu XZ, Xia XJ, Xu LR, Pandya A, Liang CY, Blanton SH, Brown SD et al. (2000) Mutations in connexin31 underlie recessive as well as dominant non-syndromic hearing loss. Hum Mol Genet 9:63-67
Nadol JB, Jr, Mulroy MJ, Goodenough DA, Weiss TF (1976) Tight and gap junctions in a vertebrate inner ear. Am J Anat 147:281-301[Medline]
Nielsen PA, Baruch A, Giepmans BN, Kumar NM (2001) Characterization of the association of connexins and ZO-1 in the lens. Cell Adhes Commun 8:213-217
Paul DL (1995) New functions for gap junctions. Curr Opin Cell Biol 7:665-672[Medline]
Reale E, Luciano L, Franke K, Pannese E, Wermbter G, Iurato S (1975) Intercellular junctions in the vascular stria and spiral ligament. J Ultrastruct Res 53:284-297[Medline]
Rouan F, White TW, Brown N, Taylor AM, Lucke TW, Paul DL, Munro CS et al. (2001) Trans-dominant inhibition of connexin-43 by mutant connexin-26: implications for dominant connexin disorders affecting epidermal differentiation. J Cell Sci 114:2105-2113
Spicer SS, Schulte BA (1996) The fine structure of spiral ligament cells relates to ion return to the stria and varies with place-frequency. Hear Res 100:80-100[Medline]
Suzuki T, Oyamada M, Takamatsu T (2001) Different regulation of connexin26 and ZO-1 in cochleas of developing rats and of guinea pigs with endolymphatic hydrops. J Histochem Cytochem 49:573-586
Toyofuku T, Yabuki M, Otsu K, Kuzuya T, Hori M, Tada M (1998) Direct association of the gap junction protein connexin-43 with ZO-1 in cardiac myocytes. J Biol Chem 273:12725-12731
Verselis V, Veenstra R (2000) Gap junction channels: Permeability and voltage gating. In Hertzberg E, ed. Gap Junctions. Stamford, CT, JAI Press, 129-192
Willecke K, Eiberger J, Degen J, Eckardt D, Romualdi A, Guldenagel M, Deutsch U et al. (2002) Structural and functional diversity of connexin genes in the mouse and human genome. Biol Chem 383:725-737[Medline]
Xia AP, Ikeda K, Katori Y, Oshima T, Kikuchi T, Takasaka T (2000) Expression of connexin 31 in the developing mouse cochlea. Neuroreport 11:2449-2453[Medline]
Xia JH, Liu CY, Tang BS, Pan Q, Huang L, Dai HP, Zhang BR et al. (1998) Mutations in the gene encoding gap junction protein beta-3 associated with autosomal dominant hearing impairment. Nature Genet 20:370-373. [published erratum appears in Nature Genet 1999 Feb;21(2):241][Medline]