Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, Vol. 48, 1553-1564, November 2000, Copyright © 2000, The Histochemical Society, Inc.


ARTICLE

A Highly Sensitive Quantitative Cytosensor Technique for the Identification of Receptor Ligands in Tissue Extracts

Z. Lenkeia, A. Beaudetb, N. Chartrelc, N. De Motaa, T. Irinopouloud, B. Braunc, H. Vaudryc, and C. Llorens-Cortesa
a INSERM U36, College de France, Paris, France
b Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada,
c INSERM U413, IFRMP 23, Universite de Rouen, Mont-Saint-Aignan, France
d INSERM U430, Paris, France

Correspondence to: C. Llorens-Cortes, INSERM U36, College de France, 3 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France. E-mail: c.llorens-cortes@college-de-france.fr


  Summary
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Because G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute excellent putative therapeutic targets, functional characterization of orphan GPCRs through identification of their endogenous ligands has great potential for drug discovery. We propose here a novel single cell-based assay for identification of these ligands. This assay involves (a) fluorescent tagging of the GPCR, (b) expression of the tagged receptor in a heterologous expression system, (c) incubation of the transfected cells with fractions purified from tissue extracts, and (d) imaging of ligand-induced receptor internalization by confocal microscopy coupled to digital image quantification. We tested this approach in CHO cells stably expressing the NT1 neurotensin receptor fused to EGFP (enhanced green fluorescent protein), in which neurotensin promoted internalization of the NT1–EGFP receptor in a dose-dependent fashion (EC50 = 0.98 nM). Similarly, four of 120 consecutive reversed-phase HPLC fractions of frog brain extracts promoted internalization of the NT1–EGFP receptor. The same four fractions selectively contained neurotensin, an endogenous ligand of the NT1 receptor, as detected by radioimmunoassay and inositol phosphate production. The present internalization assay provides a highly specific quantitative cytosensor technique with sensitivity in the nanomolar range that should prove useful for the identification of putative natural and synthetic ligands for GPCRs. (J Histochem Cytochem 48:1553–1563, 2000)

Key Words: neurotensin, green fluorescent protein, internalization, cell-based assay, orphan receptor


  Introduction
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Recent efforts in genome research have led to the identification of a growing collection of cDNA sequences encoding G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In the human alone, over 200 GPCRs have already been reported, and up to 1000 more are purported to exist (Stadel et al. 1997 ). Many of these receptors, however, are still "orphan," in that the endogenous ligands that act upon them have not yet been isolated. Given that GPCRs now represent the largest class of target molecules for drugs in clinical use (Stadel et al. 1997 ), it has become critical to identify the endogenous ligands of these orphan receptors to gain insight into their physiological role and thereby appraise their potential use as putative drug targets.

Until now, research strategies for the identification of GPCR endogenous ligands have mainly resorted to G-protein-mediated signaling as an indicator of receptor activation. Thus, the endogenous ligand for the orphan opioid-like receptor ORL1 was isolated from rat (Meunier et al. 1995 ) and porcine (Reinscheid et al. 1995 ) brain extracts using an adenylate cyclase inhibition assay in transfected cell lines. Similarly, Sakurai et al. 1998 , Cox et al. 1997 , Saito et al. 1999 , and Ames et al. 1999 identified endogenous ligands for mammalian orexin, Lymnea leucokinin, melanin-concentrating hormone, and human urotensin-II receptors, respectively, on the basis of their ability to increase intracellular calcium mobilization in cells transfected with the corresponding orphan receptors. Recently, a prolactin-releasing peptide (Hinuma et al. 1998 ) was also isolated from mammalian tissues by using the production of arachidonic acid as reporter signal. Finally, the cytosensor microphysiometer (McConnell et al. 1992 ), which detects metabolic activation of the cell by measuring acidification of the extracellular milieu, was used to identify apelin, an endogenous ligand for the human APJ receptor (Tatemoto et al. 1998 ).

Although clearly successful in these specific instances, signal transduction-based approaches have the disadvantage of being highly dependent on the successful prediction of the transduction pathways used by the orphan GPCR. In addition, the orphan receptor may have to be expressed in a variety of cell lines before one is found to exhibit viable coupling (Stadel et al. 1997 ). Finally, both signal transduction-based approaches and the more generic cytosensor microphysiometer assay are impeded by the presence of many endogenous GPCRs in the host cell line, which may interfere with the recorded signal. To circumvent these shortcomings, we devised a novel assay for endogenous ligand-induced GPCR activation based on ligand-induced internalization of fluorescently tagged receptors.

A major characteristic of GPCRs is their property of internalizing into their parent cells on ligand exposure. This phenomenon, which is also referred to as receptor–mediated endocytosis, is time- and temperature-dependent and involves clustering and sequestration of receptor-ligand complexes into clathrin-coated pits. Internalization is clearly dissociated from G-protein signaling (Hermans and Maloteaux 1998 ) and is believed to play a critical role for both receptor desensitization, through depletion from the cell surface (Yu et al. 1993 ; Beaumont et al. 1998 ), and resensitization, through dephosphorylation (Ferguson et al. 1998 ). The development of confocal microscopic imaging techniques, using either fluorescent ligands or epitope-tagged receptors, has made it possible to directly visualize the fate of internalized receptor–ligand complexes and to demonstrate that these are all endocytosed via the endosomal pathway in the form of intensely fluorescent puncta (von Zastrow and Kobilka 1992 ; Ashworth et al. 1995 ; Faure et al. 1995 ; Grady et al. 1995 ; Roettger et al. 1995 ). This is usually, although not always, accompanied by a marked decrease in cell surface receptors (von Zastrow and Kobilka 1992 ; Ashworth et al. 1995 ; Grady et al. 1995 ).

Our proposed assay consists of confocal microscopic monitoring of the fate of green fluorescent protein-tagged GPCRs in transfected cells after exposure to HPLC fractions of pre-purified tissue extracts. This approach is based on findings from several recent studies that reported successful C-terminal tagging of GPCRs with autofluorescent proteins without substantially altering pharmacological and internalization properties of the tagged GPCRs (Barak et al. 1997a , Barak et al. 1997b ; Awaji et al. 1998 ). We used here as a prototypical system the internalization of the NT1 neurotensin receptor fused to the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP), a GPCR for which the time course and intracellular patterning had been extensively characterized in both transfected and naturally expressing cells (Faure et al. 1995 ; Vandelbucke et al. 1998). Binding of neurotensin (NT) to the NT1 receptor leads to phopholipase C activation and subsequent inositol phosphate (IP) production (Hermans and Maloteaux 1998 ), so that the monitoring of IP production provided a convenient system to appraise the efficacy of our internalization-based method. We demonstrate here that this method provides a highly selective and sensitive approach for identification of ligands that act on GPCRs.


  Materials and Methods
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Plasmid Construction of the NT1–EGFP Fusion Protein
To construct NT1-EGFP, the rat NT1 cDNA (a gift from Dr S. Nakanishi; Institute for Immunology, Kyoto University Faculty of Medicine, Japan) was first amplified from plasmid pcDNA I by polymerase chain reaction using as 5'-oligonucleotide primer 5'-CTT AAG CTT ATG CAC CTC AAC AGC TCC GTG-3' [containing the nucleotides CTT, the Hind III restriction site sequence and nucleotides 1–21 of the rat NT1 cDNA (Tanaka et al. 1990 )] and as 3'-primer 5'-TTT GGA TCC GCG TAC AGG GTC TCC CGG GT-3' [corresponding to nucleotides 1255–1272 of the NT1 receptor cDNA, the sequence of the amino acid alanine followed by that of the restriction site Bam HI, and three additional nucleotides AAA). The PCR product (1292 bp) was gel-purified and digested using Hind III and Bam HI restriction enzymes and directly inserted between the Hind III and Bam HI sites of plasmid pEFGP-N1 (Clontech; Palo Alto, CA) before the 5' end of the EGFP cDNA (Fig 1A). The construct was verified by sequencing.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Construction and pharmacological characterization of the NT1–EGFP receptor stably transfected in CHO cells. (A) Linear representation of the construct coding for the NT1–EGFP fusion protein. The NT1 receptor cDNA with its C-terminal stop codon replaced by a codon coding for alanine followed by the Bam H1 restriction site was inserted in-frame into EGFP in the pEGFP–N1 polylinker between Hind III and Bam H1. (B) Establishment of the stable NT1–EGFP CHO cell line by FACS-based cell sorting; FACS analysis of CHO cells transfected with the NT1–EGFP construct before sorting (left). The selection window was set to avoid sorting of non-transfected cells (c). After sorting, several stably expressing cell lines were obtained, as described in Materials and Methods. A second FACS analysis (right) was performed to check the purity and fluorescence intensity of one selected stable cell line (no. 18, NT1–EGFP CHO), which was then used for all experiments. (C) Saturation binding of 125I-labeled Tyr3-neurotensin to CHO NT1–EGFP cells. Whole NT1–EGFP CHO cells were incubated overnight at 4C with increasing concentrations of radiolabeled NT. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 1 µM NT. Inset shows a Scatchard analysis of the data. Specific bound radioligand (B) is expressed in sites/cell and concentrations of free radioligand (F) were calculated by subtracting the amount of specifically bound ligand from the total amount of radioligand added. The data represent mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. (D) NT-induced stimulation of inositol phosphate (IP) production in NT1–EGFP CHO cells. Total IP production was measured in the presence of increasing amounts of NT. The results are expressed as the ratio of stimulated vs non-stimulated cells and represent the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments.

Preparation of Frog Brain Extracts
Adult male frogs (Rana ridibunda) were obtained from a commercial source (Couétard; St-Hilaire de Riez, France). The brains of 2500 animals (215 g wet weight) were collected and kept frozen. The tissue was boiled for 15 min in 0.5 M acetic acid and homogenized in a Waring blendor. After centrifugation (4000 x g for 30 min at 4C), the supernatant was pumped at a flow rate of 2 ml/min through 10 Sep-Pak C18 cartridges (Waters Associates; Milford, MA) connected in series. Bound material was eluted with 70% (v/v) acetonitrile in water. The eluted material was then partially evaporated in a rotavapor (Büchi; Flavil, Switzerland) and centrifuged at 13,000 x g for 5 min at 4C. The supernatant was pumped at a flow rate of 2 ml/min onto a 1 x 25-cm Vydac 218TP1010 C18 reversed-phase HPLC column (Separations Group; Hesperia, CA) equilibrated with 0.12% trifluoroacetic acid. The concentration of acetonitrile in the eluting solvent was raised from 14 to 42% over 40 min at a flow rate of 2 ml/min and then raised again to 56% over 60 min at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. One-minute fractions were collected and the absorbance was measured at 215 and 280 nm.

Stable Transfection of CHO Cells
CHO-K1 (American Type Culture Collection; Rockville, MD) were maintained in Ham's F12 medium supplemented with 7.5% fetal calf serum, 1 mM glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (all from Boehringer Mannheim; Mannheim, Germany). To establish pure cell lines expressing the NT1–EGFP receptor, 2.6 x 106 CHO-K1 cells were trasnfected with 8 µg of the plasmid, using a liposomal transfection reagent (DOSPER Liposomal Transfection Reagent, Cat. No. 1781995; Boehringer Mannheim). Transfected cells were grown in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% air and selected during 1 week for their resistance to 750 µg/ml geneticin G418 (Gibco; Cergy-Pontoise, France).

Resistant cells were dissociated by trypsin (Gibco) and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) on an Epics EST flow cytometer equipped with an Autoclone cell sorter (Coulter France; Marjency, France), made available through the Service de Cytometrie en Flux at the Jacques Monod Institute (Paris, France). Whenever possible, 10,000 gated events were collected for analysis. Dead cells and debris were excluded from analysis based on forward angle and side-scatter light gating. Excitation was achieved using an argon–ion laser emitting 488 nm light and emission was detected using a 520/30 bandpass filter. Untransfected cells were used as negative controls to exclude non-transfected CHO cells from the selection window (Fig 1B, left). Sorting was performed to distribute cells on a 96-well microplate, one cell per well. After 7 days in culture, final selection of clones was achieved by assessing the intensity of membrane fluorescence in each clone using an Olympus BX 60 fluorescent microscope equipped with a standard FITC filter set. A subsequent FACS analysis (Fig 1B, right) was performed to verify the purity and fluorescence intensity of the selected stable cell line (no. 18, NT1–EGFP CHO), which was then used for all experiments.

Radioligand Binding Assay
Stable transfected CHO cells expressing the NT1–EGFP receptor were seeded onto 48-well plates at a density of 5 x 104 cells per well. After 1 night in culture, medium was discarded and cells were washed once with 250 µl of PBS and incubated with increasing concentrations (10 to 2000 pM) of 125I-labeled Tyr3-neurotensin (2000 Ci/mmole; Amersham, Les Ulis, France) at 4C overnight in 100 µl of 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5, containing 2 mM MgCl2, 20 mM HEPES, 0.1% BSA, and 0.8 mM 1–10 phenanthroline. Nonspecific binding was determined by adding 1 µM non-radioactive neurotensin (NT). At the end of the incubation, cells were washed twice with 500 µl of the same buffer, lysed in 250 µl of 1 N NaOH, and bound radioactivity was measured with a gamma counter. Scatchard analysis of the binding data was performed using the GraphPad Prism program (GraphPad Software; San Diego, CA).

Inositol Phosphate Production
The production of total IPs by stably transfected CHO cells expressing the NT1–EGFP receptor was determined as previously described (Torrens et al. 1989 ), with slight modifications. Briefly, NT1–EGFP-transfected or untransfected CHO cells were seeded into 24-well plates at a density of 105 cells per well. After 1 night in culture, 1 µCi myo-[3H]-inositol (18 Ci/mmole; Amersham) was added to each well and the plates were incubated for a further 24 hr. Cells were then incubated for 10 min with Krebs buffer (NaCl 120 mM, KCl 4.8 mM, MgSO4 1.2 mM, NaH2PO4 15.6 mM, CaCl2 1.2 mM, glucose 0.6%, BSA 0.04%, bacitracin 0.003%) containing 10 mM LiCl, followed by 30 min at 37C with increasing concentrations of NT or individual HPLC fractions in a final volume of 200 µl of the same buffer. Total [3H]-IPs were extracted, separated on a Dowex AG1-X8 anion exchange resin (Bio-Rad; Hercules, CA) column, eluted with 1 M ammonium formate, 0.1 M formic acid, and quantified by measuring the radioactivity.

Internalization Assay
Trypsinized NT1–EGFP-transfected CHO cells were diluted to obtain 105 cells/ml in Ham's F12 medium, seeded (300 µl/well) on polyallylamine-hydrochloride-coated (Aldrich, Madison, WI; 0.1 mg/ml for 30 min) 16-well glass slides (Lab-Tek Chamber Slides, Nalge Nunc; Rochester, NY), and grown overnight in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% air. The volume of incubations (except for the pulse period) and washings was 250 µl per well. Ninety minutes before the beginning of the experiment, the medium was supplemented with cycloheximide to a final concentration of 70 µM (Sigma–Aldrich; St Quentin, France). Cells were then preincubated in ice-cold Earles' buffer, pH 7.4 (140 mM NaCl, 5mM KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 3.6 mM MgCl2), complemented with 0.1% bovine serum albumin, 0.01% glucose, and 0.8 mM 1-10 phenanthroline for 10 min. Cells were then incubated for 30 min at 4C (pulse period) with either (a) known concentrations of NT, (b) 20 nM fluorescent NT (N{alpha}-Bodipy-NT(2–13), Fluo-NT (a generous gift of J.-P. Vincent; Nice, France), or (c) individual HPLC fractions of frog brain extracts diluted in complemented Earle's buffer to a final volume of 50 µl. At this point, some cells were subjected to a hypertonic acid buffer wash (0.2 M acetic acid solution containing 0.5 M NaCl in Earle's buffer, pH 4, for 2 min) to dissociate surface-bound ligand. Internalization was promoted by replacing the incubation medium with complemented Earle's buffer at 37C and placing the cells at 37C for 20–30 min (chase period). At the end of the chase period, cells were rinsed in cold Earle's buffer, fixed for 10 min with 4% paraformaldehyde dissolved in 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.4, rinsed again in cold Earle's buffer, and coverslipped using Vectashield (Vector Laboratories; Burlingame, CA) for confocal microscopic examination. In some experiments, cell nuclei were labeled by adding 1.5{per thousand} propidium iodide (Sigma–Aldrich) to the mounting medium.

Confocal Microscopy
Cells were examined with a Leica TCS SP (Leica Microsystems; Heidelberg, Germany) confocal laser scanning microscope mounted on a Leica DM IRBE inverted microscope equipped with an argon–krypton laser. EGFP fluorescence was detected with 100% excitation at 488 nm, using an RSP 500 (dichroic) mirror and the spectrophotometer set to acquire emission between 530 and 560 nm. Fluo-NT was detected with 100% excitation at 568 nm, using a DD 488/568 dichroic mirror and the spectrophotometer set to acquire emission between 590 and 660 nm. PI was detected with excitation at 568 nm, using a DD 488/568 dichroic mirror and the spectrophotometer set to acquire emission between 580 and 700 nm. Optical sections (1024 x 1024) of individual cells were taken at the equatorial level (level of the nucleus; Fig 3), using a x63 1.32 NA oil-immersion objective. Acquisition settings were kept constant for all cells.



View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Confocal images of cycloheximide-treated CHO cells stably expressing the NT1–EGFP receptor. (A) Before ligand exposure the NT1–EGFP receptor is confined to the plasma membrane. (B) After a 5 nM neurotensin pulse at 4C, internalization of the NT1–EGFP receptor is promoted by a 20-min chase at 37C. This internalization is characterized by a decrease in plasma membrane EGFP fluorescence and the appearance of EGFP-labeled vesicles in the cytoplasm. (C) Cells subjected to acid wash at the end of the pulse period (100 nM neurotensin at 4C) show that no internalization of NT1–EGFP receptor is detected at the end of the chase period, demonstrating that NT1–EGFP receptor internalization is induced by the binding of NT to NT1–EGFP receptors during the pulse period. Bar = 5 µm. (D–F). Dual labeling experiments using Fluo-NT as ligand demonstrate that the neoformed EGFP-positive vesicles (arrowheads, D) also contain endocytosed Fluo-NT (arrowheads, E), resulting in yellow color on the merged image (arrowheads, F). Bar = 10 µM.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Confocal z-series of cycloheximide-treated CHO cells stably expressing the NT1–EGFP receptor, showing a non-stimulated cell (a–h; section intervals 1.49 µm) in which NT1–EGFP fluorescence is confined to the plasma membrane, and a cell (i–p; section intervals 0.81 µm) in which internalization of the NT1–EGFP receptor into endosomes was promoted by a 100 nM neurotensin pulse at 4C, followed by a 20-min chase at 37C. For quantification of internalization, we systematically used an "equatorial" section at the level of the nucleus, corresponding to d–e or l–m, respectively. Bar = 10 µm.

Quantification of EGFP Fluorescence Internalization
Digital image analysis was performed on a Macintosh computer using the NIH Image program (developed at the US National Institutes of Health and available on the Internet at http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image/) Microsoft Excel 5.0 (Microsoft; Redmond, Washington) and in-house-developed macro programs (submitted to the NIH Image Internet server and available at ftp://codon.nih.gov/pub/nih-image/user-macros/internalization_macros.txt). For each cell, after gray-scale conversion and median filtering, gray-scale density of pixels was measured along 12 radial axes (Fig 4A) and plot data were transferred into Excel. To better assess the amount of cell surface vs intracellular fluorescence, the gray-scale value of each pixel was multiplied by its radial distance from the measurement center, because the probability for a pixel of being sampled by this radial axis method is inversely proportional to its distance from the measurement center, and this probability is a simple function of the radius. Subsequently, Excel calculated the mean pixel density of membrane (M, corresponding to the mean gray-scale density of the most distal 30 pixels = 1 µm) and intracellular (I, mean gray-scale density for the remaining intracellular pixels) EGFP fluorescence for each cell (Fig 4B). M/I and I/M ratios were then derived for each cell from the mean of the 12 M and 12 I values.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Quantitation of internalization, as described in Materials and Methods. (A) Digital images of NT1–EGFP cells incubated without (above) or with NT (10 nM; below). Twelve radial measurement lines are outlined. (B) Example plots of gray-scale density distribution along the first two radial measurement lines for the two cells from A (above, without NT; below, panel with 10 nM NT). The mean density value of the first 30 pixels (shaded), representing the plasma membrane, yields the M value and the mean density of the remaining intracellular pixels yields the I value. The mean of the 12 M values and the 12 I values is used to calculate the M/I ratio for each cell. (C) Dose–response curve of NT-induced NT1–EGFP internalization; membrane/intracellular NT1–EGFP fluorescent ratios (M/I) as a function of NT concentrations. NT1–EGFP receptor internalization is dose-dependent and monophasic, with an EC50 = 0.98 nM.

Radioimmunoassay for Neurotensin on Pre-purified Frog Brain Fractions
Neurotensin-like immunoreactivity was measured using an antiserum (kindly supplied by Dr. G. Tramu; University of Bordeaux 1, Talence, France) raised against the C-terminal fragment of pig NT and 3-[125I]-iodotyrosyl-NT as a radioligand (Amersham; Poole, UK). The IC50 of the assay was 187 pg/tube and the minimal detectable amount of peptide was 30 pg/tube.


  Results
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Pharmacological Characterization of the NT1–EGFP Receptor
Stable transfection of CHO cells with an expression vector containing the rat NT1–EGFP cDNA conferred to these cells the ability to bind 125I-labeled Tyr3-NT in a saturable and displaceable manner (Fig 1C). Scatchard analysis of the binding data (inset in Fig 1C) indicated that the radioligand interacted with a single class of binding sites with an apparent affinity (Kd) of 299 ± 50 pM and a high binding capacity (Bmax) of 342,700 ± 3500 sites/cell.

Effect of Neurotensin on Inositol Phosphate Production in NT1-EGFP Cells
Incubation of NT1–EGFP-transfected CHO cells with increasing concentrations of rat NT (10-11–10-6 M) resulted in a dose-dependent increase in IP formation in CHO NT1–EGFP cells (Fig 1D). The concentration of rat NT eliciting a half-maximal increase in total IP production (EC50) was 1.3 ± 0.5 nM. The maximal stimulation (626% over basal level) was observed at 30 nM. Frog NT also induced an increase in IP production with an EC50 similar to that of rat NT, whereas no stimulation was observed in non-transfected CHO cells (data not shown).

Internalization of the NT1-EGFP Receptor in the Presence of Rat and Frog Neurotensin
In the confocal microscope, cells incubated either with buffer alone or with buffer containing low concentrations (<0.1 nM) of rat or frog NT showed an intense concentration of NT1–EGFP fluorescence at the level of the plasma membrane (Fig 2A and Fig 3a–3h). Incubation of NT1–EGFP-transfected cells with 1 nM–1 mM rat or frog NT resulted in a marked decrease of surface-associated fluorescent label and the appearance of many fluorescent intracytoplasmic vesicles, 0.6 µm in mean diameter (Fig 2B and Fig 3i–3p). This change in labeling pattern was no longer apparent when the cells were subjected to acid wash at the end of the pulse period (Fig 2C), demonstrating that it was induced by the binding of NT to NT1–EGFP receptors during the pulse period. Dual labeling experiments using Fluo-NT as a ligand showed that the newly formed intracytoplasmic NT1–EGFP-containing vesicles (Fig 2D) also contained Fluo-NT (Fig 2E; merged image in Fig 2F), indicating that the observed vesiculization of NT1–EGFP was due to ligand-induced internalization of receptor–ligand complexes. Quantification of membrane/intracellular fluorescent ratios (M/I) indicated that this internalization was dose-dependent, with an EC50 = 0.98 nM (Fig 4C).

Internalization of NT1–EGFP Receptors Induced in the Presence of HPLC Fractions from Frog Brain Extracts
In a first set of experiments, 0.5-µl aliquots from each of 10 consecutive fractions were pooled (total number of fractions 120, yielding 12 pools of 10 fractions) and each pool was completed to 50 µl with Earle's buffer. Of these 12 pools, only the second one, containing fractions 11–20, promoted internalization of NT1–EGFP (data not shown). In a second set of experiments, fractions of Pool 2 and Pool 3 (used as negative controls) were tested individually (0.5 µl of each fraction completed to 50 µl with Earle's buffer). Of these, only fractions 15, 16, 17 and 18 promoted internalization of NT1–EGFP (Fig 5A). This internalization was not detected when the cells were subjected to an acid wash at the end of the pulse period (data not shown), indicating that the internalization was ligand-induced.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Internalization of the NT1–EGFP receptor (A) and inositol phosphate (IP) production (B) in NT1–EGFP-transfected cells induced by reversed-phase HPLC fractions 14–19 and 24–27 (shown as negative control) of prepurified frog brain extracts. (C) NT-like immunoreactivity detected in the same fractions. Note that the same fractions (15–18) promote internalization of the NT1–EGFP receptor, induce IP production and contain immunoreactive NT-like material.

Stimulation of IP Production by HPLC Fractions From Frog Brain Extracts on NT1–EGFP Cells
In a first set of experiments, 5-µl aliquots from each fraction (total number of fractions 120) were pooled in pairs and completed to 50 µl with distilled water. Five microliters from each of these 60 pools was diluted in a final volume of 200 µl and checked for the capacity to stimulate IP production. Only Pools 8 and 9, containing fractions 15, 16 and 17, 18, respectively, induced an increase in IP production comparable to that observed with a maximal dose of rat or frog NT (10-7 M) (data not shown). In a second set of experiments, 5 µl each of HPLC fractions 14–19 and 24–28 (used as negative controls) was checked individually. Only fractions 15, 16, 17, and 18 stimulated IP production (Fig 5B).

RIA Measurement of Neurotensin in HPLC Fractions From Frog Brain Extracts
Characterization of NT-like immunoreactivity contained in Sep-Pak-pre-purified frog brain extracts was carried out by combining HPLC analysis and RIA detection (Fig 5C). The immunoreactive material eluted from fractions 15–18, with a major peak detected in fraction 16. The amounts of NT-like immunoreactivity measured in the whole fractions 15, 16, 17, and 18 were 141 ng, 350 ng, 285 ng, and 118 ng, respectively.


  Discussion
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

We describe here a novel single cell-based assay that should be applicable to the identification of endogenous ligands of orphan receptors. In contrast to currently used signal transduction-based screening methods, which monitor changes in the generation of second messengers (Meunier et al. 1995 ; Reinscheid et al. 1995 ; Cox et al. 1997 ; Hinuma et al. 1998 ; Sakurai et al. 1998 ; Ames et al. 1999 ; Saito et al. 1999 ), the present approach is based on the direct observation of ligand-induced internalization of fluorescently tagged receptors expressed in eukaryotic cells after incubation with prepurified tissue extracts. Ligand-induced internalization is a cellular phenomenon that is undergone by the majority of GPCRs and which gives rise to an intracellular trafficking pattern that can be easily monitored by confocal microscopy. We demonstrate here the feasibility of harnessing this physiological process for ligand detection by showing that it can be successfully used for the recovery of neurotensin (NT), an endogenous ligand of the NT1 receptor, from reversed-phase HPLC fractions of frog brain extracts, a rich source of neuropeptides (Chartrel et al. 1998 ).

For this purpose, we established a stable CHO cell line expressing the NT1 receptor fused with EGFP. The pharmacological properties of this NT1–EGFP receptor were similar to those of the wild-type NT1 receptor. Accordingly, incubation of NT1–EGFP-expressing CHO cells or transiently transfected COS-7 cells (unpublished results) with exogenous NT resulted in a dose-dependent internalization of the tagged NT1 receptor. By confocal microscopy, this internalization was characterized by a progressive depletion of cell surface receptors and by the formation of small intracellular fluorescent clusters. This internalization pattern was similar to that previously observed in these as well as in other cell types that express the NT1 receptor (Chabry et al. 1995 ; Beaudet et al. 1998 ; Vandenbulcke et al. 1998) or other GPCRs (von Zastrow and Kobilka 1992 ; Ashworth et al. 1995 ; Grady et al. 1995 ; Roettger et al. 1995 ; Barak et al. 1997a , Barak et al. 1997b ). Double-labeling experiments using Fluo-NT as ligand showed that receptor and ligand were co-localized within the same intracytoplasmic organelles throughout the time frame studied (20–30 min), in keeping with earlier observations in other cell systems, which demonstrated that NT1 receptor internalization involved receptor–ligand complexes (Beaudet et al. 1998 ; Vandenbucke et al. 1998 ).

Four of the 120 frog brain fractions tested on NT1–EGFP-expressing CHO cells induced receptor internalization as monitored by confocal microscopy. The same four fractions, and only these four, were found to stimulate the production of IP in our heterologous transfection system. This finding confirmed that the internalization-promoting fractions were the only ones to contain an NT1-activating factor. Because NT was the endogenous ligand most likely to be present in these fractions, we tested individual fractions using a radioimmunoassay for frog NT and did indeed find the peptide to be present within each of the active ones. Although we cannot exclude the possibility that other peptides documented to act at the NT1 site, such as neuromedin N or xenopsin (Kitabgi et al. 1985 ), may also be present within the active fractions, the present data demonstrate that our internalization assay can be applied to the detection of minute quantities of a GPCR ligand in a biological sample potentially containing several hundreds of different peptides. By using successive HPLC purification and evaluation steps, it should therefore be possible to isolate a fraction that induces receptor internalization and contains a single peptide. Subsequent identification of this peptide could then be achieved by sequencing, as previously reported for the opioid-like ORL1 receptor (Meunier et al. 1995 ) and the APJ receptor (Tatemoto et al. 1998 ).

The method devised here to quantitate the amount of ligand-induced internalized EGFP–NT1 receptor proved highly sensitive because it enabled us to detect nanomolar concentrations of ligand in the incubation medium. Given that the Kd for NT binding to the NT1 receptor is in the same concentration range, it appears that the affinity of the ligand for its receptor is the major determinant for the sensitivity of the proposed technique. Thus, in the present assay we detected femtomolar quantities of neurotensin from 0.5 µl of the initial HPLC fractions. Furthermore, because the observation of a single cell is theoretically sufficient for testing a single HPLC fraction from brain extracts, further miniaturization of the procedure should be possible to help economize precious starting material. To our knowledge, this method represents the first quantitative approach for assessing GPCR activation using such a minimal assay system as a single transfected cell.

The present method offers several advantages over the activation-based methods previously devised for the same purpose. First, it is completely independent of signaling mechanisms downstream of the receptor and therefore does not rely on a search for the appropriate transduction pathway, specific coupling of individual GPCRs being notoriously difficult to predict from their primary sequence. In addition, in the absence of knowledge of the effector molecules downstream of the orphan GPCR, transduction-based methods often require expression of the receptor in different cell lines before viable coupling can be established.

Second, internalization of G-protein-coupled receptors is triggered only by their specific ligands. This latter property is particularly important for the screening of biological samples such as brain extracts, which may contain several hundreds or thousands of different peptides. Therefore, simultaneously activated (and perhaps also internalized) but non-tagged endogenous receptors will remain invisible and will not interfere with the detection of tagged receptor internalization. By contrast, generation of second messengers in transduction-based assay systems, acidification of the extracellular milieu in the cytosensor microphysiometer system (McConnell et al. 1992 ), and mobilization of ß-arrestins in the cell sensor system proposed by Barak et al. 1997a , Barak et al. 1997b may all be triggered by endogenous receptors. The elimination of the resulting false-positive responses usually requires extra time and consumes valuable biological samples.

Third, ligand-induced internalization appears to be an almost universal property of GPCRs. Hence, the advantage of the present approach over systems based on downstream events is demonstrated such as the translocation of fluorescently tagged ß-arrestin-2 after GPCR activation (Barak et al. 1997a , Barak et al. 1997b ). Indeed, several GPCRs, such as the angiotensin AT1 receptor (Hunyady 1999 ), the GnRH receptor (Vrecl et al. 1998 ), and several subtypes of muscarinic cholinergic receptors (Lee et al. 1998 ) were recently shown to internalize in an arrestin-independent fashion. Admittedly, a number of GPCRs may either undergo only limited ligand-induced internalization [e.g., the somatostatin type-1 (Roth et al. 1997 ) or the ß3-adrenergic receptor (Liggett et al. 1993 )] or internalize according to a pattern that can be less readily monitored than that of NT1 by confocal microscopy (e.g. the sst5 somatostatin receptor subtype; Stroh et al. 2000 ). Nevertheless, the internalization-based method described here should be useful to identify endogenous ligands for the vast majority of GPCRs.

Autofluorescent proteins are not the only molecular tags suited to visualize receptor internalization. For example, it is possible to engineer a receptor presenting an epitope that is detectable by subsequent immunohistochemistry. However, the direct fluorescent label of the orphan GPCR confers some additional advantages to the method. First, the success of cell transfection and the correct plasma membrane expression of the labeled orphan GPCR can easily be verified, because mutant versions of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) are easily detectable using standard fluorescence microscopic equipment. Second, establishment of stable cell lines is largely facilitated by the expression of a marker that is easily detectable in living cells (Lybarger et al. 1996 ), as shown in the present study in which it allowed rapid selection of highly expressing clone founder cells. Finally, a presently unexplored possibility of our technique is the simultaneous expression of several different GPCRs fused to different spectral variants of GFP in the same cell line, which would allow the simultaneous evaluation of the same fraction for the activation of different receptors.

In conclusion, the present internalization-based assay system offers a simple, selective, and highly sensitive quantifiable method for the detection of ligands acting on GPCRs. Therefore, this technique should allow reliable detection of an endogenous ligand for an orphan GPCR in a biological sample and consequently, by using successive purification and evaluation steps, should enable pure peptide to be obtained, which could be subsequently identified by sequencing. Other possible applications include screening of potential agonists and antagonists of GPCRs or detection of femtomolar quantities of known ligands dissolved in microvolumes of biological or non-biological solutions. This approach should not be limited to GPCRs, because a large group (Class II) of receptor tyrosine kinases, such as the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor, undergo similar ligand-induced internalization (Haigler et al. 1978 ), which is maintained after EGFP tagging (Carter and Sorkin 1998 ). The present method should therefore be also applicable to the identification of new polypeptide growth factors. In fact, it should be useful for the detection of any other bioactive molecules (e.g., toxins, lectins, serum transport proteins, antibodies, or even viruses) that induce internalization of specific cell membrane receptors.


  Acknowledgments

Supported by grants from the Institut National de La Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (APEX no. 4X011E to C.L–C) and from the Conseil Regional de Haute Normandie to C.N., B.B., H.V., from the Medical research Council of Canada to A.B., and from the Ministère de l'Education du Quebec to Z.L.

We thank Mariette Houle for expert technical assistance and Charles Parnot for the help on Excel macros.

Received for publication December 29, 1999; accepted June 7, 2000.


  Literature Cited
Top
Summary
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Literature Cited

Ames RS, Sarau HM, Chambers JK, Willette RN, Aiyar NV, Romanic AM, Louden CS, Foley JJ, Sauermelch CF, Coatney RW, Ao Z, Disa J, Holmes SD, Stadel JM, Martin JD, Liu WS, Glover GI, Wilson S, McNulty DE, Ellis CE, Elshourbagy NA, Shabon U, Trill JJ, Hay DW, Ohlstein EH, Bergsma DJ, Douglas SA (1999) Human urotensin-II is a potent vasoconstrictor and agonist for the orphan receptor GPR14. Nature 401:282-286[Medline]

Ashworth R, Yu R, Nelson EJ, Dermer S, Gershengorn MC, Hinkle PM (1995) Visualization of the thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor and its ligand during endocytosis and recycling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:512-516[Abstract]

Awaji T, Hirasawa A, Kataoka M, Shinoura H, Nakayama Y, Sugawara T, Izumi S, Tsujimoto G (1998) Real-time optical monitoring of ligand-mediated internalization of alpha1b-adrenoceptor with green fluorescent protein. Mol Endocrinol 12:1099-1111[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Barak LS, Ferguson SS, Zhang J, Caron MG (1997a) A beta-arrestin/green fluorescent protein biosensor for detecting G protein-coupled receptor activation. J Biol Chem 272:27497-27500[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Barak LS, Ferguson SS, Zhang J, Martenson C, Meyer T, Caron MG (1997b) Internal trafficking and surface mobility of a functionally intact beta2-adrenergic receptor-green fluorescent protein conjugate. Mol Pharmacol 51:177-184[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Beaudet A, Nouel D, Stroh T, Vandenbulcke F, Dal-Farra C, Vincent JP (1998) Fluorescent ligands for studying neuropeptide receptors by confocal microscopy. Braz J Med Biol Res 31:1479-1489[Medline]

Beaumont V, Hepworth MB, Luty JS, Kelly E, Henderson G (1998) Somatostatin receptor desensitization in NG108-15 cells. A consequence of receptor sequestration. J Biol Chem 273:33174-33183[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Carter RE, Sorkin A (1998) Endocytosis of functional epidermal growth factor receptor-green fluorescent protein chimera. J Biol Chem 273:35000-35007[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chabry J, Botto JM, Nouel D, Beaudet A, Vincent JP, Mazella J (1995) Thr-422 and Tyr-424 residues in the carboxyl terminus are critical for the internalization of the rat neurotensin receptor. J Biol Chem 270:2439-2442[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chartrel N, Braun B, Collin F, Pierreuse B, Coulouarn Y, Tostivint H, Jeandel L, Trabucchi M, Vieau D, Lihrmann I, Tonon MC, Anouar Y, Conlon JM, Vaudry H (1998) Strategy for identification of novel neuropeptides. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil 192:619-638. [review article in French][Medline]

Cox KJ, Tensen CP, Van der Schors RC, Li KW, van Heerikhuizen H, Vreugdenhil E, Geraerts WP, Burke JF (1997) Cloning, characterization, and expression of a G-protein-coupled receptor from Lymnaea stagnalis and identification of a leucokinin-like peptide, PSFHSWSamide, as its endogenous ligand. J Neurosci 17:1197-1205[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Faure MP, Alonso A, Nouel D, Gaudriault G, Dennis M, Vincent JP, Beaudet A (1995) Somatodendritic internalization and perinuclear targeting of neurotensin in the mammalian brain. J Neurosci 15:4140-4147[Abstract]

Ferguson SS, Zhang J, Barak LS, Caron MG (1998) Role of beta-–arrestins in the intracellular trafficking of G-protein-coupled receptors. Adv Pharmacol 42:420-424[Medline]

Grady EF, Garland AM, Gamp PD, Lovett M, Payan DG, Bunnett NW (1995) Delineation of the endocytic pathway of substance P and its seven-transmembrane domain NK1 receptor. Mol Biol Cell 6:509-524[Abstract]

Haigler H, Ash JF, Singer SJ, Cohen S (1978) Visualization by fluorescence of the binding and internalization of epidermal growth factor in human carcinoma cells A-431. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:3317-3321[Abstract]

Hermans E, Maloteaux JM (1998) Mechanisms of regulation of neurotensin receptors. Pharmacol Ther 79:89-104[Medline]

Hinuma S, Habata Y, Fujii R, Kawamata Y, Hosoya M, Fukusumi S, Kitada C, Masuo Y, Asano T, Matsumoto H, Sekiguchi M, Kurokawa T, Nishimura O, Onda H, Fujino M (1998) A prolactin-releasing peptide in the brain. Nature 393:272-276[Medline]

Hunyady L (1999) Molecular mechanisms of angiotensin II receptor internalization. J Am Soc Nephrol 10(suppl 11):S47-S56[Medline]

Kitabgi P, Checler F, Mazella J, Vincent JP (1985) Pharmacology and biochemistry of neurotensin receptors. Rev Clin Basic Pharmacol 5:397-486

Lee KB, Pals–Rylaarsdam R, Benovic JL, Hosey MM (1998) Arrestin-independent internalization of the m1, m3, and m4 subtypes of muscarinic cholinergic receptors. J Biol Chem 273:12967-12972[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Liggett SB, Freedman NJ, Schwinn DA, Lefkowitz RJ (1993) Structural basis for receptor subtype-specific regulation revealed by a chimeric beta 3/beta 2-adrenergic receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:3665-3669[Abstract]

Lybarger L, Dempsey D, Franek KJ, Chervenak R (1996) Rapid generation and flow cytometric analysis of stable GFP-expressing cells. Cytometry 25:211-220[Medline]

McConnell HM, Owicki JC, Parce JW, Miller DL, Baxter GT, Wada HG, Pitchford S (1992) The cytosensor microphysiometer: biological applications of silicon technology. Science 257:1906-1912[Medline]

Meunier JC, Mollereau C, Toll L, Suaudeau C, Moisand C, Alvinerie P, Butour JL, Guillemot JC, Ferrara P, Monsarrat B, Mazarguil H, Vassart G, Parmentier M, Constentin J (1995) Isolation and structure of the endogenous agonist of opioid receptor-like ORL1 receptor. Nature 377:532-535[Medline]

Reinscheid RK, Nothacker HP, Bourson A, Ardati A, Henningsen RA, Bunzow JR, Grandy DK, Langen H, Monsma FJ, Jr, Civelli O (1995) Orphanin FQ: a neuropeptide that activates an opioidlike G protein-coupled receptor. Science 270:792-794[Abstract]

Roettger BF, Rentsch RU, Pinon D, Holicky E, Hadac E, Larkin JM, Miller LJ (1995) Dual pathways of internalization of the cholecystokinin receptor. J Cell Biol 128:1029-1041[Abstract]

Roth A, Kreienkamp HJ, Nehring RB, Roosterman D, Meyerhof W, Richter D (1997) Endocytosis of the rat somatostatin receptors: subtype discrimination, ligand specificity, and delineation of carboxy-terminal positive and negative sequence motifs. DNA Cell Biol 16:111-119[Medline]

Saito Y, Nothacker HP, Wang Z, Lin SH, Leslie F, Civelli O (1999) Molecular characterization of the melanin-concentrating-hormone receptor. Nature 400:265-269[Medline]

Sakurai T, Amemiya A, Ishii M, Matsuzaki I, Chemelli RM, Tanaka H, Williams SC, Richardson JA, Kozlowski GP, Wilson S, Arch JR, Buckingham RE, Haynes AC, Carr SA, Annan RS, McNulty DE, Liu WS, Terrett JA, Elshourbagy NA, Bergsma DJ, Yanagisawa M (1998) Orexins and orexin receptors: a family of hypothalamic neuropeptides and G protein-coupled receptors that regulate feeding behavior. Cell 92:573-585[Medline]

Stadel JM, Wilson S, Bergsma DJ (1997) Orphan G protein-coupled receptors: a neglected opportunity for pioneer drug discovery. Trends Pharmacol Sci 18:430-437[Medline]

Stroh T, Jackson AC, Sarret P, Dal Farra C, Vincent JP, Kreienkamp HJ, Mazella J, Beaudet A (2000) Intracellular dynamics of sst5 receptors in transfected COS-7 cells: maintenance of cell surface receptors during ligand-induced endocytosis. Endocrinology 141:354-365[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tanaka K, Masu M, Nakanishi S (1990) Structure and functional expression of the cloned rat neurotensin receptor. Neuron 4:847-854[Medline]

Tatemoto K, Hosoya M, Habata Y, Fujii R, Kakegawa T, Zou MX, Kawamata Y, Fukusumi S, Hinuma S, Kitada C, Kurokawa T, Onda H, Fujino M (1998) Isolation and characterization of a novel endogenous peptide ligand for the human APJ receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 251:471-476[Medline]

Torrens Y, Daguet De Montety MC, el Etr M, Beaujouan JC, Glowinski J (1989) Tachykinin receptors of the NK1 type (substance P) coupled positively to phospholipase C on cortical astrocytes from the newborn mouse in primary culture. J Neurochem 52:1913-1918[Medline]

Vandenbucke F, Nouel D, Stroh T, Vincent J-P, Beaudet A (1998) Differential intracellular trafficking of neurotensin and its receptor in COS-7 transfected cells. Soc Neurosci Abstr 24:1592

von Zastrow M, Kobilka BK (1992) Ligand-regulated internalization and recycling of human beta 2-adrenergic receptors between the plasma membrane and endosomes containing transferrin receptors. J Biol Chem 267:3530-3538[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vrecl M, Anderson L, Hanyaloglu A, McGregor AM, Groarke AD, Milligan G, Taylor PL, Eidne KA (1998) Agonist-induced endocytosis and recycling of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor: effect of beta-arrestin on internalization kinetics. Mol Endocrinol 12:1818-1829[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yu SS, Lefkowitz RJ, Hausdorff WP (1993) Beta-adrenergic receptor sequestration. A potential mechanism of receptor resensitization. J Biol Chem 268:337-341[Abstract/Free Full Text]