Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, Vol. 49, 923-924, July 2001, Copyright © 2001, The Histochemical Society, Inc.


BRIEF REPORT

Protease XXIV Increases Detection of Mucin Gene Expression during In Situ Hybridization in Archival Tissue

Jeanette M. Rheinhardta and Walter E. Finkbeinera
a Department of Pathology, University of California–Davis, Davis, California

Correspondence to: Jeanette M. Rheinhardt, Medical Pathology, UCDMC, University of California, Davis, 4645 2nd Avenue, Research III, Rm 3400A, Sacramento, CA 95817. E-mail: jmrheinhardt@ucdavis.edu


  Summary
Top
Summary
Introduction
Literature Cited

Digoxigenin-labeled riboprobes of six groups of human mucins were evaluated for sensitivity in archival tissue, using protease XXIV or proteinase K during in situ hybridization. (J Histochem Cytochem 49:923–924, 2001)

Key Words: digoxigenin, mucins, riboprobes, ISH


  Introduction
Top
Summary
Introduction
Literature Cited

DIGESTION OF CROSSLINKED proteins with proteolytic enzymes enhances detection of nucleic acids in paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Proteinase K has long been accepted as the standard enzyme used for proteolytic digestion in in situ hybridization (ISH). Protease XXIV, although used previously in immunohistochemistry (IHC) and flow cytometry, has rarely been incorporated into ISH protocols. In this study we investigated if differences in peptide bond cleavage caused by these two enzymes affected detection of mucin gene expression as detected in archival tissue using ISH. Six mucin riboprobes, MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC, MUC5B, MUC6, and MUC7, were evaluated. Plasmids containing MUC cDNA were obtained as gifts from several laboratories. Competent bacteria were transformed, grown, and plasmids isolated. After treatment with appropriate restriction enzymes, linearized plasmids were synthesized into digoxigenin-labeled riboprobes by a commercial laboratory (Lofstrands Labs; Gaithersburg, MD).

For these studies, we used samples representing the tissues from which each mucin gene was cloned originally. Tissue blocks were identified by random search of the archival files of the Department of Pathology, University of California, Davis Medical Center and screened only to select for proper orientation. Five blocks were chosen for each mucin gene.

All tissues had been fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin using standard techniques. However, the duration that the tissues remained unfixed after their surgical removal and the ultimate duration of fixation was unknown. Adjacent sections from each block were run under identical conditions except for protease treatment. Tissue sections were deparaffinized, hydrated, quenched for endogenous phosphatases, and treated with either protease XXIV (Sigma, St Louis, MO; P-8038, 0.1 mg/ ml) or proteinase K (Sigma; P-2308, 0.01 mg/ml) for 10 min at 37C. For hybridization, the tissue sections were placed in a humidification chamber at concentrations specific for each probe and tissue type for 6–8 hr. The slides were reacted with RNase A and RNase T1 for 30 min to hydrolyze remaining unhybridized mucin riboprobe. Subsequent stringency washes were specific for each probe. Slides were incubated with a monoclonal antibody to digoxigenin conjugated to alkaline phosphatase and visualized with NBT/BCIP. All slides were developed for the same amount of time.

Reactivity of ISH product was quantified by image analysis using an AutoCyte workstation (Burlington, NC) and software (Image Pro; Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD). An area of interest was selected on a slide (either protease XXIV or proteinase K treated) and an image captured. The corresponding field on the adjacent section treated with the other proteinase was located and its image captured. Using the image analysis software, the percentage of the area that contained reaction product was determined. At least five fields per slide were compared. Results were analyzed using a paired t-test.

For each mucin, the amount of mucin mRNA as detected with ISH was increased with protease XXIV. With MUC5AC, ISH with proteinase K was not sensitive enough to detect any target mRNA. For the remaining mucin genes studied, the increased sensitivity when protease XXIV was used ranged from 1.5 to 2.7 times greater than when proteinase K was employed (Table 1).


 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Reactivity of mucin ISH expressed as percentage of area stained ± SEM (n = 15 determinations from five different samples)

Tissue samples derived from medical procedures and processed routinely for pathological diagnosis are not ideal for use in scientific studies requiring ISH investigations. This results primarily from autolysis or lack of standardized fixation. The size and density of the tissue used may also contribute to variable fixation. The majority of clinical laboratories use neutral buffered formalin for tissue preservation. Formaldehyde crosslinks amino groups preventing loss of cellular mRNA (Basyuk et al. 2000 ). Underfixed tissue may lose cellular mRNA during autolytic cell breakdown or during tissue processing through extraction of cell components during alcohol dehydration. Overfixed tissue can presumably lose signal by excessive crosslinkage of protein peptide bonds (Wilcox 1993 ).

Proteolytic digestion of formaldehyde-fixed tissue is necessary to break crosslinked peptide bonds and allow access to target nucleotides by ISH probes. To a certain extent, protease digestion can compensate for less than ideal fixation. However, protease digestion should be optimized to maximize signal through the unmasking of target nucleotides while still preserving morphology (Naoumov et al. 1988 ; Unger et al. 1989 ). Optimal protease digestion is highly dependent on both the duration of fixation and the type of tissue being digested (Fleming et al. 1992 ).

Although proteinase K is the standard enzyme used in ISH, other enzymes, including pepsin (Unger et al. 1989 ; Bromley et al. 1994 ), pronase (Unger et al. 1989 ; Weiss and Chen 1991 ), protease VIII (Fleming et al. 1992 ), protease XIV (Infantolino et al. 1989 ; Basyuk et al. 2000 ), and protease XXIV (Naoumov et al. 1988 ), have also been successfully incorporated into ISH protocols. Proteinase K (P-8038) isolated from the fungus Tritrachium album degrades many proteins even in their native state. Its predominant site of cleavage is the peptide bonds adjacent to the carboxyl group of aliphatic and aromatic amino acids with blocked {alpha}-amino groups. It is commonly used for its broad specificity.

Protease VIII and protease XXIV are essentially the same enzyme (Enzyme Commission No. 3.4.21.62), both isolated from Bacillus subtilis. These are serine proteases not specific for a given peptide bond but demonstrating preference for hydrolyzing at the carboxyl side of large uncharged amino acid residues (tyrosine, asparagine, and glutamine).

Fleming et al. 1992 found that protease VIII exhibited a wider range of optimal digestion than proteinase K when used for ISH. However, these studies did not compare the effects of these enzymes for use with clinical specimens that had been variably fixed and processed. In our studies, we found protease XXIV to be the enzyme of choice for protease digestion of archival tissue when used for detection of human mucin gene expression. We expect that protease XXIV digestion will aid in the detection of other mRNA species when used in ISH investigation of archival tissues.


  Footnotes

Presented in part at the Joint Meeting of the Histochemical Society and the International Society for Analytical and Molecular Morphology, Santa Fe, NM, February 2–7, 2001.


  Acknowledgments

Approved by the University of California Human Subjects Review Committee and supported by the Cigarette and Tobacco Surtax Fund of the State of California through the Tobacco Related Disease Program, grant 9RT-0214.

Received for publication November 28, 2000; accepted February 16, 2001.


  Literature Cited
Top
Summary
Introduction
Literature Cited

Basyuk E, Bertrand E, Journot L (2000) Alkaline fixation drastically improves the signal of in situ hybridization. Nucleic Acids Res 28:e46[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bromley L, McCarthy SP, Strickland JE, Lewis CE, McGee JO'D (1994) Non-isotopic in situ detection of mRNA for interleukin-4 in archival human tissue. J Immunol Methods 167:47-54[Medline]

Fleming KA, Evans M, Ryley KC, Franklin D, Lovell–Badge RH, Morey AL (1992) Optimization of non-isotopic in situ hybridization on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material using digoxigenin-labeled probes and transgenic tissues. J Pathol 167:9-17[Medline]

Infantolino D, Pinarello A, Ceccato R, Barbazza R (1989) HBV-DNA by in situ hybridization. A method to improve sensitivity on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded liver biopsies. Liver 9:360-366[Medline]

Naoumov NV, Alexander GJM, Eddleston ALWF, Williams R (1988) In situ hybridisation in formalin fixed, paraffin wax embedded liver specimens: method for detecting human and viral DNA using biotinylated probes. J Clin Pathol 41:793-798[Abstract]

Unger ER, Chandler FW, Chenggis ML, Ou CY, Warfield DT, Feorino PM (1989) Demonstration of human immunodeficiency virus by colorimetric in situ hybridization: a rapid technique for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded material. Mod Pathol 2:200-204[Medline]

Weiss LM, Chen YY (1991) Effects of different fixatives on detection of nucleic acids from paraffin-embedded tissues by in situ hybridization using oligonucleotide probes. J Histochem Cytochem 39:1237-1242[Abstract]

Wilcox JN (1993) Fundamental principles of in situ hybridization. J Histochem Cytochem 12:1725-1733





This Article
Abstract
Full Text (PDF)
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Articles by Rheinhardt, J. M.
Articles by Finkbeiner, W. E.
Articles citing this Article
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Rheinhardt, J. M.
Articles by Finkbeiner, W. E.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]