ARTICLE |
Correspondence to: Erik Hrabovszky, Dept. of Neurobiology, Inst. of Experimental Medicine, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest 1083, Hungary. E-mail: hrabovszky@koki.hu
![]() |
Summary |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The goal of the present studies was to optimize mRNA detection with radioisotopic in situ hybridization histochemistry (ISHH). Test experiments performed on sections of rat brain tissue used computer-assisted image analysis to compare autoradiographic signals resulting when varying concentrations of 35S-labeled cRNA probes, dextran sulfate (DS), and dithiothreitol (DTT) were used for ISHH. We found that greatly enhanced corrected signal density (total density of signal area minus background density) was obtained using concentrations of probe and/or DS that were several-fold higher than those widely recommended in published ISHH procedures (probe concentration >4 x 104 cpm/µl; DS concentration >10%). Extended hybridization reaction (>16 hr) also significantly augmented the corrected signal density. Finally, nonspecific probe binding was greatly reduced and corrected signal density enhanced by including 7501000 mM, rather than the widely used 10200 mM DTT, in the hybridization buffer. These observations indicate that the low efficiency of hybridization and the formation of high background may largely compromise the sensitivity of routine ISHH procedures. We suggest that the new method using increased concentrations of 35S-labeled cRNA probe, DS, and DTT will be especially important for the cellular localization of rare mRNA species.
(J Histochem Cytochem 50:13891400, 2002)
Key Words: autoradiography, background, brain, complementary ribonucleic, acid probes, dextran sulfate, dithiothreitol, image analysis, in situ hybridization, quantitation, radioisotope
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Detection of mRNA expression with in situ hybridization histochemistry (ISHH;
The detection of rare mRNA species in individual neurons of the brain requires ISHH techniques that provide high sensitivity and also allow single-cell resolution. Recently, we observed that increasing concentrations of 35S-labeled cRNA hybridization probes, dextran sulfate (DS), and dithiothreitol (DTT) in the hybridization solution could noticeably enhance the autoradiographic hybridization signal for mRNAs encoding estrogen receptor isoforms. Application of this reformulated, but not the standard, hybridization solution enabled us to detect low expression levels of estrogen receptor-ß (ERß) mRNA in the majority of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone neurons (
The present studies were conducted to formally establish whether routine hybridization procedures provide submaximal hybridization signals. In addition, strategies were developed to improve the detection sensitivity of the ISHH method. To accomplish these aims, we assessed the impact of increased radioisotopic probe (>40,000 cpm/µl), DS (>10%), and DTT (>200 mM) concentrations in the hybridization solution, and also evaluated the influence of an extended hybridization time (>16 hr) on levels of autoradiographic hybridization signal and background.
![]() |
Materials and Methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Tissue Preparation
Adult female SpragueDawley rats (n=3; 225 g bw) were maintained and treated in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the University of Massachusetts IAUCC. After sacrifice of animals with CO2, brains were removed and snap-frozen on pulverized dry ice. Twelve-µm coronal sections through the cerebral cortex were prepared on a cryostat, thaw-mounted onto double gelatin-coated microscopic slides, dried, and stored in slide boxes at -80C as described previously (
Preparation of cDNA Templates for In Vitro RNA Transcription
Both sense and antisense RNA probe sequences were used for hybridization assays. To ensure that results obtained were not probe-specific, we used several cRNA probes, each of which produced hybridization signal in the cerebral cortex. The cDNA template for androgen receptor (AR; 2 subunit of GABA-A receptor mRNA, a 304-bp cDNA template (gift from Dr. C.D. Carpenter), corresponding to nucleotides 15301833 (
In Vitro Transcription of Antisense and Sense RNA Probes
The 10-µl transcription reactions were composed of the following ingredients: [35S]-UTP (NEN Life Science Products; Boston, MA), 120 pmol; linearized cDNA template, 1 µg; 5 x transcription buffer, 2 µl; 100 mM DTT (Sigma Chemical; St Louis, MO), 1 µl; 10 mM ATP, CTP, and GTP, 0.5 µl of each; 20 U/µl RNasin (Promega; Madison, WI), 0.5 µl; appropriate RNA polymerase (T3, T7, or SP6; Promega), 10 U. The reaction was allowed to proceed for 30 min at 37C. Then a second aliquot of RNA polymerase (10 U) was added and the mixture incubated for a second period of 30 min. After incubation, the volume was brought up to 90 µl with nuclease-free water, and we added 5 µl 1 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0), 1 µl tRNA, (25 mg/ml; Sigma), 1 µl 1 M MgCl2, 0.5 µl 20 U/µl RNasin (Promega), and 0.5 µl 10 U/µl DNase I (Roche Diagnostics; Indianapolis, IN). The template DNA was digested for 30 min at 37C, and finally the probe was purified by extraction with phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol, then with chloroform/isoamyl alcohol. Unincorporated nucleotides were removed by two sequential NaCl/ethanol precipitations. The probe pellets were finally dissolved in 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS; Sigma) and radioactivity concentrations (in terms of cpm/µl) determined using a Beckman LS 6000 SC ß-counter.
Preparation of Hybridization Buffer
The standard hybridization buffer was modified from a previously described formulation (
Prehybridization Tissue Treatment Steps
Before ISHH, the slides were removed from the -80C freezer, warmed to RT (10 min), and loaded into RNase-free metal racks. The racks were placed in RNase-free plastic containers and sections were processed through the following prehybridization steps: 30-min fixation in phosphate-buffered (pH 7.4) 4% formaldehyde solution; 2-min rinse in 2 x SSC solution; 10 min acetylation in 0.25% acetic anhydride (Sigma)/0.9% NaCl/0.1 M triethanolamine (pH 8.0; Sigma) (
In Situ Hybridization
The slides were placed in Nalgene boxes in which the air was humidified using caps of 50-ml centrifuge tubes containing distilled water. Twenty-five µl of hybridization solution was pipetted onto each section and covered with a glass coverslip. The standard hybridization reaction was carried out at 56C for 16 hr (overnight).
Posthybridization Tissue Treatment Steps
The coverslips were floated off the slides in 1 x SSC solution and the excess of hybridization solution was rinsed off in three changes of 1 x SSC solution. Then the slides were loaded into metal racks and the following incubation steps were carried out under agitation: 1 x SSC (RT), twice for 20 min; 50% formamide/2 x SSC mixture (52C), twice for 30 min; 2 x SSC (RT), 10 min; 50 µg/ml RNase A (Roche Diagnostics) dissolved in 500 mM NaCl/10 mM Tris-HCl/1 mM EDTA, pH 7.8, 37C), 30 min; rinse in 2 x SSC (RT), 10 min; 50% formamide/2 x SSC (52C), 30 min. Finally, the slides were rinsed in 2 x SSC buffer at RT (10 min), dipped briefly in distilled water (2 sec), rinsed in 70% ethanol (10 min), and air-dried on slide trays.
X-ray Autoradiography
For X-ray autoradiography, the slides were aligned in exposure cassettes and apposed to Kodak ß-Max autoradiographic films for 214 days. The autoradiographs were developed with a Konica SRX-101A automated film processor.
Emulsion Autoradiography
After the development of film autoradiographs, the slides were dipped in Kodak NTB-3 nuclear emulsion (diluted at 1:1 with distilled water) and exposed for 14 weeks. The images were developed using Dektol developer (Kodak; Rochester, NY) for 2 min, rinsed with distilled water for 30 sec, and fixed with Kodak fixer for 5 min. Then the sections were rinsed in distilled water for 5 min and dried on slide trays.
Coverslipping of Sections
The sections were immersed in xylenes for 2 min, then coverslipped using DPX mounting medium (Fluka Chemie; Buchs, Switzerland) and used for light microscopic evaluation.
Computerized Semi-quantitative Image Analysis of X-ray Film Autoradiographs
X-ray films were placed on a light box and images were captured and digitized using a BioQuant Windows image analysis system (R and M Biometrics; Nashville, TN) interfaced with a CCD video camera (Hitachi Denshi; Tokyo, Japan) and an AF MicroNikkor 60-mm objective. The average gray level of highlighted pixels (on a 0255 scale) was measured over a similar region of the cingulate cortex or the retrosplenial cortex in each section to determine the total density of the signal area ("total signal density"). In addition, "background density" measurement was taken over the white matter of the corpus callosum in each section. The background density measurement was subtracted from the total signal density to obtain the "corrected signal density" value. The mean of replicate measurements was determined for each test group, and means were compared by ANOVA. NewmanKeuls tests were performed post hoc when indicated.
Processing of Photographic Images
Representative film autoradiographs from each group were used for photographic illustrations. In addition, emulsion autoradiographs were examined using a Nikon light microscope and photographed with the CCD video camera. Digital images were processed using Adobe Photoshop 4.0 software (Tucson, AZ). In each experiment, representative photographs were merged into a single table before editing to maintain a reliable visual comparison of individual panels.
Preparation of RNase A-pretreated Sections for Control Studies
The slides were removed from the -80C freezer, placed in Coplin jars, and fixed for 10 min in acetone. The sections were air-dried briefly, then incubated in RNase A solution (50 µg/ml; Roche Diagnostics) for 30 min, as described above. To remove residual RNase A from the sections, the slides were rinsed abundantly with 2 x SSC solution (five times for 5 min). Formaldehyde fixation and further prehybridization treatment steps of the RNase-treated sections were performed in the same way as for untreated sections.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Application of 1000 mM Instead of 200 mM DTT to Reduce Background Density of X-ray Film Autoradiographs
In practice, the use of high amounts of radioisotopic probe is limited by the formation of unacceptably high nonspecific background. In an attempt to overcome this problem, we addressed the advantage of increasing the concentration of DTT from 200 mM to 1000 mM in the hybridization solution. A sense-strand RNA transcript to the GABA A 2 receptor subunit was used for the first hybridization experiment in the presence of either 200 mM or 1000 mM DTT. Because the pattern of background generated by this probe was not similar to the distribution of neuronal cells (Fig 1A1D), it was unlikely that cross-hybridization of the probe to tissue nucleic acids contributed to the background we observed. Test experiments were performed using our standard hybridization solution containing 40,000 cpm/µl probe and 10% DS, as well as a modified hybridization solution that included a largely elevated probe concentration (200,000 cpm/µl) and 20% instead of 10% DTT, which further increased the effective concentration of the probe (
|
|
We found that the use of DTT at 1000 mM instead of 200 mM significantly reduced background density (F=1463.18; p<0.05). Compare Fig 1B and Fig 1D and blocks 2B to 2A and 2D to 2C in Fig 2. The extent of reduction was high when increased amounts of probe (200,000 cpm/µl) and DS (20%) were used (32% in the white matter; compare blocks 2D to 2C in Fig 2), as opposed to the slight (but significant; p<0.05) reduction observed using the standard probe (40,000 cpm/µl) and DS (10%) concentrations of our procedure (18% in the white matter; compare blocks 2B to 2A in Fig 2).
The inclusion of enhanced probe/DS concentrations in the hybridization solution significantly augmented background density (F=549.64; p<0.05), as shown by the comparison of Fig 1C to Fig 1A and Fig 1D to Fig 1B and blocks in Fig 2C and Fig 2D. Background density enhancements were robust if the hybridization buffer contained 200 mM DTT (30%; compare blocks 2C to 2A in Fig 2) and slight if the hybridization solution contained 1000 mM DTT (7%; compare blocks 2D to 2B in Fig 2).
Tissue characteristics (white or gray matter) also exerted a statistically significant effect on background (F=9.94; p<0.05). NewmanKeuls test showed that film density over the white matter was significantly higher (p<0.01) than over the gray matter (Fig 1C; compare the two columns in block C of Fig 2) if high probe/DS were combined with low DTT. In contrast, background was evenly distributed between the white matter and the gray matter when we used the low probe/DS combination with low DTT (p=0.18; Fig 1A; compare the two columns in block A of Fig 2), low probe/DS with high DTT (p=0.59; Fig 1B; two columns in block B of Fig 2) or high probe/DS in the presence of high DTT (p=0.79; Fig 1D; two columns in block D of Fig 2).
A second experiment used RNase A-pretreated sections for hybridization with an antisense PR probe. This approach was designed to prevent any hybridization to occur between the probe and tissue RNA molecules (2 receptor subunit probe (compare Fig 1E, Fig 1F, and Fig 1G in representative photomicrographs obtained using identical probe, DS, and DTT concentrations). In addition, the modified hybridization procedure simultaneously using high DTT (1000 mM), high probe (200,000 cpm/µl), and high DS (20%) concentrations in RNase A-untreated control sections generated autoradiographic images characterized by high signal and low background labeling (compare signal density in gray matter vs background density in white matter structures in Fig 1H).
Effects of Increased Probe, Increased DS, or Both, on Hybridization Signals
To address the potential advantage of using increased probe and increased DS concentrations in the hybridization solution, consecutive sections were divided into nine groups (six to eight sections/group) and hybridized for 16 hr with the antisense probe to the 2 subunit of the GABA-A receptor, using three different concentrations of probe (40,000, 80,000, or 120,000 cpm/µl) and DS (10, 20, or 30%) in the hybridization solution. High amounts of DTT (750 mM) were added to the hybridization buffer to suppress nonspecific probe binding. After posthybridization treatments, the slides were exposed to X-ray films for 50 hr, then the autoradiographs were developed (Fig 3). Corrected signal density was determined in each treatment group (Fig 5) and two-way ANOVA, with DS concentration and probe concentration as main effects, was performed. Autoradiographs derived from 14C standards (using empty film density for background correction) were also analyzed to determine the 14C radioisotope concentrations causing identical corrected density to individual groups of hybridized sections. Finally, the full set of sections used in this experiment was coated with nuclear track emulsion. The emulsion autoradiographs were developed after 7 days of exposure and were used for light microscopic evaluation of hybridization signals in the cingulate cortex (Fig 4).
|
|
|
The distribution pattern of hybridization signal for the GABA A 2 mRNA was identical using any combination of DS and probe concentrations, but film density differed largely in each group (Fig 3). Corrected signal density of the cingulate cortex showed robust enhancements as probe and/or DS contents of the hybridization solution increased (Fig 5). The influences of probe (F=63.59; p<0.01) and DS (F=864.80; p<0.01) concentrations were statistically significant. Furthermore, they showed significant interaction (F1,2=3.67; p<0.01) (Fig 5). The corrected signal density produced by our routine hybridization procedure was increased approximately fourfold in this experiment by raising probe and DS concentrations (compare the last column to the first column in Fig 5 and Fig 3I). A similar enhancement of corrected density could be generated by a tenfold increase in 14C radioisotope concentration (radioactivity/area), as we established by the analysis of co-exposed 14C standards. In addition, emulsion autoradiographs of the cingulate cortex (Fig 4A4I) demonstrated that individual neurons gained improved definition by the clustering of silver grains when probe and/or DS was used at increased concentrations. Diffuse background, represented by homogeneously scattered grains in the molecular layer of the cingulate cortex (middle portion of individual panels in Fig 4), was negligible in all groups.
Use of a Series of Different Test Probes to Extend the Validity of the Concept that Routine Hybridization Conditions Produce Submaximal Hybridization Signals
We used a series of test probes to various targets (galanin, PR, and AR mRNAs) and of different lengths to address the issue of whether increased concentrations of probe and/or DS can further increase hybridization signals (corrected signal density). Results of ISHH studies using the galanin (Fig 6A6D), the PR (Fig 6E and Fig 6F), and the AR (Fig 6G and Fig 6H) probes under various test conditions uniformly indicated that increased signal intensities could be achieved as probe and/or DS concentrations were increased in the presence of 800 mM DTT. For each test probe, the effects of increased probe (in Fig 6B vs 6A, Fig 6F vs 6E) and increased DS (in Fig 6D vs 6B and Fig 6H vs 6G) concentration on corrected signal densities were statistically significant by one-way ANOVA (p<0.05). These findings corroborated the idea that the lower probe and DS concentrations did not allow target mRNA saturation to occur.
|
Use of Extended Hybridization Time as an Alternative to Increased Probe to Further Verify the Concept that Regular Hybridization Reactions are Incomplete
On the basis of the concept that incomplete hybridization reactions should provide higher signals if allowed to proceed longer, the hybridization time was extended from the commonly used 16 hr (overnight hybridization;
|
Titration of The Probe Concentration that Generates Maximal Corrected Signal Density
A broad range of probe concentrations were tested to establish hybridization conditions that provide maximal corrected signal density in a 16-hr hybridization reaction. To minimize background associated with high amounts of radioisotope in the hybridization solutions, the test experiment used a PR probe that was labeled to low specific activity in the presence of 108 µM UTP and 12 µM [35S]-UTP. Using this approach, the "plateau" phase of the hybridization reaction was expected at tenfold lower radioisotope concentration than using a probe labeled to maximal specific activity (in the absence of unlabeled UTP). Probe concentrations ranging from 4,000 cpm/µl to 176,000 cpm/µl were tested in a hybridization buffer that contained 20% DS and 1000 mM DTT. For each section group hybridized, mean total density, background density, and corrected signal density values were determined from film autoradiographs. For experimental design, see columns in Fig 8. Results of this study established that the highest value of corrected signal density (asterisk in Fig 8) was obtained using 20% DS and 40,00064,000 cpm/µl probe. When compared with results of the standard procedure (10% DS and 4,000 cpm/µl of the low specific-activity test probe), this represented a threefold total increase of corrected signal density, of which 80% was already achieved by simultaneously raising DS from 10% to 20% and probe from 4000 to 16,000 cpm/µl. We also found that increasing the concentration of probe from 64,000 cpm/µl to 88,000 cpm/µl or further tended to slightly decrease the computable value of corrected signal density. This phenomenon was a consequence of a sudden rise in background density (Fig 8).
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The results of these studies demonstrate that the sensitivity of conventional ISHH procedures can be improved significantly by increasing the concentrations of 35S-labeled cRNA probe (>40,000 cpm/µl), DS (>10%), and DTT (>200 mM) in the hybridization solution, or by using an extended hybridization reaction time (>16 hr). These modifications will facilitate the cellular localization of low-abundance mRNAs in brain and other tissues.
The Concept of Target mRNA Occupation (Saturation)
A plateau phase in hybrid formation was demonstrated in vitro using immobilized nucleic acid targets (
DTT Concentration
Although the mechanism by which DTT reduces nonspecific background is only partially understood (
The Rate of Hybrid Formation
Nucleic acid hybridization to immobilized targets follows pseudo-first-order kinetics if probe is in large access (
Probe Concentration
The enhancements of corrected signal density after application of increased probe concentrations were robust and reproducible using a variety of cRNA probes to different mRNA targets and of various lengths. Application of the low specific-activity PR probe in the presence of 1000 mM DTT revealed that a corrected density plateau was approached only with probe concentrations an order of magnitude higher than those recommended in published ISHH procedures and with 20%, instead of 10% DS, in the hybridization buffer, which further enhanced the effective probe concentration (
DS Concentration
Consistent with the concept that DS increases the effective probe concentration by excluding probe molecules from the volume occupied by the polymer (
Detection Sensitivity
The practical value of using probe, DS, and DTT at increased concentrations will be the enhanced detection sensitivity of the isotopic ISHH procedure. This expectation is supported by our recent observation of ER-ß mRNA expression in the majority of LHRH neurons, which required the simultaneous application of high probe, high DS, and high DTT in the hybridization solution (2 cRNA probe, the advantage of these modifications was confirmed by the markedly improved clustering of silver grains over individual cortical neurons. In the same experiment, the difference we found between the lowest and the highest corrected signal density of film autoradiographs was comparable to a 10-fold difference in 14C radioisotope concentration on co-exposed radioisotope standards. Although without the use of appropriate tissue paste calibration standards (
Autoradiographic Background
One must be aware that increased probe and DS may amplify hybridization artifacts, in addition to the advantage of enhancing detection sensitivity. Two distinct categories of nonspecific probetissue interactions we have to consider (
The second important source of nonspecific probe binding is cross-hybridization of probes with rRNA and mRNA sequences that are partially homologous with the targeted mRNA (2 RNA transcript. However, whenever high probe and DS concentrations are used one should consider the increased importance of specificity controls (
Use of Corrected Signal Density to Indicate the Completeness of Hybridization Reaction
Digital subtraction of background (e.g., background produced by a sense control probe;
To summarize our data, we demonstrated that the low efficiency of hybrid formation and the generation of high oxidative background may largely compromise the sensitivity of in situ mRNA detection using 35S-labeled cRNA probes. We suggest that the use of increased concentrations of 35S-labeled cRNA probe, DS, and DTT will greatly facilitate the cellular localization of rare mRNA species in brain and other tissues.
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
Supported by grant HD27305 from the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD).
We wish to thank Drs C.D. Carpenter, R. Handa, O.K. ParkSarge, and M.E. Vrontakis for their kind donation of cDNAs.
Received for publication February 5, 2002; accepted May 1, 2002.
![]() |
Literature Cited |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Angerer LM, Angerer RC (1981) Detection of poly A+ RNA in sea urchin eggs and embryos by quantitative in situ hybridization. Nucleic Acids Res 9:2819-2840[Abstract]
Crabbe MJ (1985) Partial sequence homologies between cytoskeletal proteins, c-myc, Rous sarcoma virus and adenovirus proteins, transducin, and beta- and gamma-crystallins. Biosci Rep 5:167-174[Medline]
Davenport A (1998) Quantification of in situ hybridization macro-autoradiograms. In Polak JM, McGee J, O'D , eds. In Situ Hybridization. Principles and Practice. 2nd ed Oxford, Oxford Medical Publications, 21-33
Davenport AP, Beresford IJM, Hall MD, Hill RG, Hughes J (1988) Quantitative autoradiography in neuroscience. In Van Leeuwen FW, Buijs RM, Pool CW, Pach O, eds. Molecular Neuroanatomy. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science, 121-145
Galau GA, Britten RJ, Davidson EH (1977a) Studies on nucleic acid reassociation kinetics: rate of hybridization of excess RNA with DNA, compared to the rate of DNA renaturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:1020-1023[Abstract]
Galau GA, Smith MJ, Britten RJ, Davidson EH (1977b) Studies on nucleic acid reassociation kinetics: retarded rate of hybridization of RNA with excess DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:2306-2310[Abstract]
Gall JG, Pardue ML (1969) Formation and detection of RNA-DNA hybrid molecules in cytological preparations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 63:378-383[Abstract]
Guiot Y, Rahier J (1995) The effects of varying key steps in the non-radioactive in situ hybridization protocol: a quantitative study. Histochem J 27:60-68[Medline]
Höfler H, Mueller J, Werner M (1998) Principles of in situ hybridization. In Polak JM, McGee J, O'D , eds. In Situ Hybridization. Principles and Practice, 2nd ed. Oxford, Oxford Medical Publications, 1-19
Hrabovszky E, Shughrue PJ, Merchenthaler I, Hajszan T, Carpenter CD, Liposits Z, Petersen SL (2000) Detection of estrogen receptor-beta messenger ribonucleic acid and 125I-estrogen binding sites in luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone neurons of the rat brain. Endocrinology 141:3506-3509
Hrabovszky E, Steinhauser A, Barabas K, Shughrue PJ, Petersen SL, Merchenthaler I, Liposits Z (2001) Estrogen receptor-beta immunoreactivity in luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone neurons of the rat brain. Endocrinology 142:3261-3264
Kuhar MJ, Unnerstall JR, De Souza EB (1985) Receptor mapping in neuropharmacology by autoradiography: some technical problems. NIDA Res Monogr 62:1-12[Medline]
Lubahn DB, Joseph DR, Sar M, Tan J, Higgs HN, Larson RE, French FS et al. (1988) The human androgen receptor: complementary deoxyribonucleic acid cloning, sequence analysis and gene expression in prostate. Mol Endocrinol 2:1265-1275[Abstract]
Miller JA (1991) The calibration of 35S or 32P with 14C-labeled brain paste 14C-plastic standards for quantitative autoradiography using LKB Ultrofilm or Amersham Hyperfilm. Neurosci Lett 121:211-214[Medline]
Molenaar P, O'Reilly G, Sharkey A, Kuc RE, Harding DP, Plumpton C, Gresham GA et al. (1993) Characterization and localization of endothelin receptor subtypes in the human atrioventricular conducting system and myocardium. Circ Res 72:526-538[Abstract]
Nunez DJ, Davenport AP, Emson PC, Brown MJ (1989) A quantitative in-situ hybridization method using computer-assisted image analysis. Validation and measurement of atrial-natriuretic-factor mRNA in the rat heart. Biochem J 263:121-127[Medline]
Palfi A, Hatvani L, Gulya K (1998) A new quantitative film autoradiographic method of quantifying mRNA transcripts for in situ hybridization. J Histochem Cytochem 46:1141-1149
ParkSarge OK, Mayo KE (1994) Regulation of the progesterone receptor gene by gonadotropins and cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate in rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 134:709-718[Abstract]
Petersen SL, McCrone S (1994) Characterization of the receptor complement of individual neurons using dual-label in situ hybridization histochemistry. In Eberwine JH, Valentino K, Barchas J, eds. In Situ Hybridization in Neurobiology. Advances in Methodology. New York, Oxford University Press, 78-94
Shivers BD, Killisch I, Sprengel R, Sontheimer H, Kohler M, Schofield PR, Seeburg PH (1989) Two novel GABA A receptor subunits exist in distinct neuronal subpopulations. Neuron 3:327-337[Medline]
Sunday M (1998) The design and generation of probes for in situ hybridization. In Polak JM, McGee J, O'D , eds. In Situ Hybridization. Principles and Practice. 2nd ed Oxford, Oxford Medical Publications, 21-33
Tecott L, Eberwine J, Barchas J, Valentino K (1987) Methodological considerations in the utilization of in situ hybridiztion. In Valentino K, Eberwine J, Barchas J, eds. In Situ Hybridization: Applications to Neurobiology. 2nd ed New York, Oxford University Press, 1-23
Vizi S, Gulya K (2000) Calculation of maximal hybridization capacity (Hmax) for quantitative in situ hybridization: a case study for multiple calmodulin mRNAs. J Histochem Cytochem 48:893-904
Vrontakis ME, Peden LM, Duckworth ML, Friesen HG (1987) Isolation and characterization of a complementary DNA (galanin) clone from estrogen-induced pituitary tumor messenger RNA. J Biol Chem 262:16755-16758
Wahl GM, Stern M, Stark GR (1979) Efficient transfer of large DNA fragments from agarose gels to diazobenzyloxymethyl-paper and rapid hybridization by using dextran sulfate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:3683-3687[Abstract]
Zoeller RT, Fletcher DL, Butnariu O, Lowry CA, Moore FL (1997) N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) can significantly improve in situ hybridization results using 35S-labeled oligodeoxynucleotide or complementary RNA probes. J Histochem Cytochem 45:1035-1041