RAPID COMMUNICATION |
Correspondence to: Clive R. Taylor, Dept. of Pathology, U. of Southern California School of Medicine, HMR 204, 2011 Zonal Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90033. E-mail: taylor@pathfinder.hsc.usc.edu
![]() |
Summary |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
During the course of diagnostic surgical pathology, pathologists have established a large collection of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues that form invaluable resources for translational studies of cancer and a variety of other diseases. Accessibility of macromolecules in the fixed tissue specimens is a critical issue as exemplified by heat-induced antigen retrieval (AR) immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. On the basis of observations that heating may also enhance in situ hybridization (ISH) and the similarity of formalin-induced chemical modifications that occur in protein and in DNA, we designed a study to examine the efficiency of DNA extraction from archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues using an adaptation of the basic principles of the AR technique, i.e., heating the tissue under the influence of different pH values. Archival paraffin blocks of lymph nodes, tonsil, and colon were randomly selected. Each paraffin block was prepared in 34 microtubes. For each paraffin block, one tube was used as a control sample, using a non-heating DNA extraction protocol. The other 33 tubes were tested using a heating protocol under 11 variable pH values (pH 2 to 12) under three different heating conditions (80, 100, and 120C). Evaluation of the results of DNA extraction was carried out by measuring yields by photometry and PCR amplification, as well as kinetic thermocycling (KTC)-PCR methods. In general, lower pH (acid) solutions gave inferior results to solutions at higher pH (alkaline). Heating tissues at a higher temperature and at pH 69 gave higher yields of DNA. There appeared to be a peak in terms of highest efficiency of extracted DNA at around pH 9. The average ratios 260:280 of extracted DNA also showed better values for samples heated at 120C. PCR products of three primers showed satisfactory results for DNA extracted from archival paraffin-embedded tissues by heating protocols at pH 612, with results that were comparable to the control sample subjected to the standard non-heating, enzymatic DNA extraction method. This study is the first to document the use of heating at an alkaline pH for DNA extraction from archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues, a recommendation based on the principles of AR for protein IHC. These findings may lead to a more effective protocol for DNA extraction from archival paraffin-embedded tissues and may also provide enhanced understanding of changes that occur during formalin-induced modification of nucleic acids. (J Histochem Cytochem 50:10051011, 2002)
Key Words: antigen retrieval, DNA extraction, formalin-fixed,, paraffin-embedded tissue, PCR
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Formalin has been used as a fixative in pathology for more than a hundred years. The criteria employed by pathologists for the diagnosis of many diseases have been established in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin. During more than a century of diagnostic practice, a large number of archival paraffin-embedded tissue banks have been established worldwide. These tissue banks form invaluable resources of tissues for translational studies of cancer and various other diseases. Accessibility of macromolecules in the fixed tissue specimens is a critical issue, as exemplified by the growth of immunohistochemical (IHC) methods for the demonstration of protein antigens (
We developed the hypothesis that there may be analogies between "retrieval" of proteins for IHC and extraction of nucleic acids from archival paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Extraction of DNA from archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue was accomplished as early as 1985 using proteinase K and SDS as the major reagents (
The present study was designed to test the efficiency of DNA extraction from archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues based on application of the basic principles of the AR technique for proteins: heating the tissue under the influence of different pH value as previously documented (
![]() |
Materials and Methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Tissues
Archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded human tonsil, lymph nodes, and normal colon tissues were obtained from the Norris Cancer Hospital and Research Institute at the University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine (USC) from 1991 to 2000. Tissues had been processed as follows. Immediately after removal from the patients, all samples were routinely fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin [average period of fixation was 24 hr at room temperature (RT)]. Fixed tissues were processed routinely through dehydration in graded ethanol, clearing in xylene, and embedding in paraffin blocks using automatic processing and embedding equipment (Tissue Tek VIP; Sakura Finetek, Torrance, CA). Selection of paraffin blocks was based on examination of one hematoxylin and eosin-stained slide to estimate the area of tissue and the total number of cells for comparability among different tissue sections. The study of human-derived tissue specimens has been exempted under 45 CFR 46.101 (b) and was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB #009071) at USC.
Each paraffin block was cut at 10 µm and collected in an autoclaved plastic microtube (1.5 ml). For each microtube, two sections of total 20-µm thickness were carefully collected to ensure that an equivalent amount of tissue was placed in each microtube.
Heating Procedure
A heat block (VWR Scientific Products; West Chester, PA) was used to attain a boiling heating condition (100C105C). An autoclave for sterilization (Market Forge; New York, NY) was used to achieve a super high temperature heating at 120C. A water bath (Precision Scientific Inc; Chicago, IL) was used to maintain a temperature of 80C.
Universal Buffer Solution
A Britton and Robinson type of buffer was prepared for 11 buffer solutions ranging from pH 2.0 to 12.0. Briefly, the principal solution was made of 28.6 mM of each chemical as follows: citrate acid, KH2PO4, H3BO3, and diethylbarbituric acid. A solution of 0.2 N sodium hydroxide was added according to the original formula to reach the pH value demonstrated by pH meter (Oakton pHTestr 3; Singapore).
Design of Test
Samples from each of six paraffin blocks were prepared in 34 microtubes as described above, i.e., every tube contained an equal amount of two tissue sections of total 20 µm. A total of 204 tubes of tissue was included in this study. For each paraffin block, one tube was used as control sample by using a non-heating DNA extraction protocol. The other 33 tubes were tested using the heating protocol under 11 variable pH values (pH 2 to 12), and three different heating conditions (80, 100, and 120C). Evaluation of the results of DNA extraction was carried out by measuring yields by photometry (BioPhotometer; Eppendorf Scientific, Hamburg, Germany) and PCR amplification as well as the kinetic thermocycling (KTC)-PCR methods.
Non-heating DNA Extraction Protocol
Deparaffinization was carried out by adding 1 ml xylene to the microtube containing tissue sections for 30 min for two changes, followed by 100% and 75% ethanol for 30 min with two changes. After a washing step with PBS for 15 min in two changes 500 µl of lysis buffer (proteinase K 20 mg/ml, 50 µl, 1 M Tris-HCl solution 10 µl, 0.5 M EDTA 2 µl, 10% SDS 100 µl, and distilled water 838 ml) was added and incubated at 52C overnight until all tissue fragments were dissolved completely. Further extraction and purification procedures were performed by the following steps: addition of 500 µl phenol:chloroform:isopropanol alcohol (Invitrogen Life Technologies; Carlsbad, CA) at 25:24:1 to the de-waxed tissue, followed by mixing by vortex (Daigger Vortex; Scientific Industries, Bohemia, NY), and centrifugation (Eppendorf Scientific; Hamburg, Germany) at RT, 12,000 x g for 10 min. The supernatant fluid was removed to an autoclaved microtube using a 100-µl pipette, and one volume of chloroform was added, mixed by vortexing, and centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 5 min. The upper aqueous supernatant was carefully removed to another fresh microtube, adding 0.1 volume of 3 M sodium acetate and again mixed by vortexing, followed by addition of 1 volume of isopropanol, and incubation at -20C overnight. The precipitated DNA was centrifuged at 12,000 x g at 4C. The supernatant fluid was discarded and the precipitate washed once with 75% ethanol. The extracted DNA was collected after further centrifugation. The final yield of DNA was dissolved in 50 µl distilled water after drying completely in a hood.
Heating Protocol for DNA Extraction
A total of 500 µl universal buffer solution at various pH values ranging from pH 2 to 12 was added to each microtube containing a 20-µm tissue section and was heated at 80C, 100C, or 120C, respectively, using a water bath, heat block, or autoclave as described above. The heating time was 20 min for all temperatures. A cooling time of 5 min was allowed after heating. Further steps of extraction and purification were exactly as used for non-heating DNA extraction described above, except that enzyme digestion was omitted to compare the efficiency of DNA extraction more accurately.
Evaluation of DNA Yields
Using a photometer, the amount of DNA yield was measured according to the standard protocol recommended by the manufacturer.
The quality of DNA yields was evaluated by two laboratories [Drs. Datar and Shi, USC; Dr. Wu, Roche Molecular Systems (Alameda, CA)] independently using the PCR amplification with three primers, and the kinetic thermocycling (KTC)-PCR method.
PCR Analysis
Each DNA extract was used as a template for PCR amplification, using three primer pairs as listed in Table 1. PCR tests were carried out based on groups of DNA samples extracted from six paraffin blocks under side-by-side identical conditions, i.e., each group consisted of 11 DNA samples that were extracted by heating at defined temperatures in buffer solutions of differing pH values, together with one sample extracted by the non-heating method as a control. Thus, for each paraffin block, three groups of heating at 80C, 100C, and 120C were tested, for a total of 36 PCR test results that were evaluated by gel electrophoresis.
|
PCR was performed by standard methods. The DNA sample diluted in 2 µl of distilled water containing 100 ng as template was added to 43 µl of 1.1 x ReddyMix PCR Master Mix [1.25 U Taq DNA polymerase, 75 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.8, at 25C, 20 mM (NH4)2SO4 , 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.01% (v/v) Tween-20, 0.2 mM each of dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP]. The PCR protocol was then carried out with an initial 5-min denaturation step at 94C coupled to a repeating cycle of 1 min at 94C (denaturation), 1 min at 56C (annealing), and 1 min at 72C (extension) for 40 cycles, followed by a 10-min completion step.
Kinetic Thermocycling (KTC)-PCR
"Real-time" KTC-PCR assays (
The copy number of the amplifiable genomic DNA extracted from archival tissue sections was measured by KTC-PCR to examine the effect of pH of universal buffer solution and heating temperature on the yield. Three pairs of primers were used for KTC-PCR test. The first pair amplifies a 90-bp fragment from the region covering exon 3 of the p53 gene; the second pair amplifies a 168-bp fragment from region of exon 2. The third pair amplifies a 368-bp fragment from exon 4. A purified genomic DNA of a known copy number from Roche Molecular Biochemicals was used as a standard control. The experimental procedure was as described above. The results are shown in Fig 3.
|
|
|
Statistical Analysis
Student's t-test for paired samples was performed to compare the effects of different temperatures on DNA yield at pH 69. The results were considered significant when two-sided p values were less than 0.05.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Measurement of DNA Yields
Total yields of DNA extracted from paraffin blocks correlated with the pH value of the buffer solution and the heating temperature, as summarized in Table 2 and Fig 1. Above pH 5, the amount of DNA yield was significantly increased. A peak of highest efficiency of extracted DNA was present at pH 9. In general, low pH (acid) was poorer than high pH (alkaline). Heating tissues at higher temperature produced greater yields of DNA, as shown in Fig 1 and Table 2. Fig 1 showed significant differences between 120C and 80C from pH 6 to pH 9 (T value = 7.899; p=0.004) and between 120C and 100C from pH 6 to pH 9 (T value = 5.957; p=0.0095). The average ratios 260:280 of extracted DNA also showed better values for samples heated at 120C. For example, the average ratios 260:280 for 80C, 100C, and 120C in buffer at pH 9 were 1.41, 1.44, and 1.60, respectively.
|
The control group, using the "routine" enzyme digestion protocol for DNA extraction from archival paraffin-embedded tissue sections, gave total yields for six samples of 44,275 ng compared to the "best" result of heating extraction of approximately 30,000 ng (Table 1). However, the quality of DNA extracted from paraffin-embedded tissue sections was equivalent based on comparable ratios 260:280 (1.58 for control sample vs 1.60 for heating at 120C in buffer solution of pH 9), as well as PCR products described below.
PCR Products
PCR products of three primers showed satisfactory results for DNA extracted from archival paraffin-embedded tissues by heating protocols at pH 612 with higher temperatures. The findings were comparable to those of the control sample obtained by a non-heating enzymatic DNA extraction method, as shown in Fig 2. In general, the better PCR products were seen at higher pH and higher temperatures. Some bands of PCR products were absent for samples obtained at 80C heating conditions, particularly when larger primers of 347 bp (STS WI-7034) and 541 bp (actin) were used.
KTC-PCR Products
The yields of amplifiable genomic DNA measured by Exon 3 primers to amplify a 90-bp fragment (Fig 3A) were affected by pH as well as heating temperature. If the pH was lower than 5, no amplifiable DNA was recovered regardless of the temperature at which the samples were heated. A heating temperature of 80C gave lower yields than either 100C or 120C in a pH range from 6 to 12. The best condition for yields of amplifiable genomic DNA by exon 3 primers was heating at 120C in the universal buffer with a pH of 1012. Sections of 20 µm gave about 10,000 copies/µl measured by the exon 3 primer.
When the exon 2 primer was used to amplify a 168-bp fragment (Fig 3B), the results were consistent. The best condition appeared to be 120C with a pH of 1012. However, the yield of amplifiable genomic DNA was lower, about 5500 copies/µl, indicating that the amplification efficiency of exon 2 is lower than that of exon 3 from the same genomic DNA isolated from paraffin-embedded tissue.
When the exon 4 primer was used to amplify a 368-bp fragment (Fig 3C), the results were consistent with those of both exon 3 and exon 2. The best result was achieved by heating tissues at 120C in a universal buffer solution at pH 11. However, the yield of amplifiable genomic DNA was even lower, about 1200 copies/µl, indicating that the amplification efficiency of exon 4 is lower than that of both exon 3 and exon 2 from the same genomic DNA isolated from paraffin-embedded tissue.
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Recent publications have demonstrated that high-temperature heating may improve DNA extraction from archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues (
Alkaline lysis methods (at RT or 95C) have been used previously for DNA extraction from bacteria (
The mechanism of action of heating in alkaline pH solution for DNA extraction may be similar to a hypothesis proposed for the mechanism of AR under different conditions of temperature and pH (
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
Supported by an NIH grant 1 R21 CA91249-01.
We greatly appreciate Dr Andy E. Sherrod's kind help in providing some paraffin blocks for study. We also thank Ms Lillian Young for management of our laboratory.
Received for publication March 29, 2002; accepted April 3, 2002.
![]() |
Literature Cited |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Auerbach C, MoutschenDahmen M, Moutschen J (1977) Genetic and cytogenetical effects of formaldehyde and related compounds. Mutation Res 39:317-362[Medline]
Banerjee SK, Makdisi WF, Weston AP, Mitchell SM, Campbell DR (1995) Microwave-based DNA extraction from paraffin-embedded tissue for PCR amplification. BioTechniques 18:768-773[Medline]
Birnboim HC, Doly J (1979) A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 7:1513-1523[Abstract]
Bull JH, Harnden P (1999) Efficient nuclear FISH on paraffin-embedded tissue sections using microwave pretreatment. BioTechniques 26:416-422[Medline]
Coombs NJ, Gough AC, Primrose JN (1999) Optimisation of DNA and RNA extraction from archival formalin-fixed tissue. Nucleic Acids Res 27:e12-17
Dubeau L, Chandler LA, Gralow JR, Nichols PW, Jones PA (1986) Southern blot analysis of DNA extracted from formalin-fixed pathology specimens. Cancer Res 46:2964-2969[Abstract]
Faulkner SW, Leigh DA (1998) Universal amplification of DNA isolated from small regions of paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed tissue. BioTechniques 24:47-50[Medline]
Frank TS, SvobodaNewman SM, Hsi ED (1996) Comparison of methods for extracting DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin sections for nonisotopic PCR. Diagn Mol Pathol 5:220-224[Medline]
Goelz SE, Hamilton SR, Vogelstein B (1985) Purification of DNA from formaldehyde-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 130:118-126[Medline]
Gu J, Farley R, Shi S-R, Taylor CR (2000) Target retrieval for in situ hybridization. In Shi S-R, Gu J, Taylor CR, eds. Antigen Retrieval Techniques: Immunohistochemistry and Molecular Morphology. Natick, MA, Eaton Publishing, 115-128
Higuchi R, Fockler C, Dollinger G, Watson R (1993) Kinetic PCR analysis: real-time monitoring of DNA amplification reactions. BioTechnology 11:1026-1030[Medline]
Kitayama Y, Igarashi H, Sugimura H (1999) Amplification of FISH signals using intermittent microwave irradiation for analysis of chromosomal instability in gastric cancer. Mol Pathol 52:357-359[Abstract]
Klintschar M, Neuhuber F (2000) Evaluation of an alkaline lysis method for the extraction of DNA from whole blood and forensic stains for STR analysis. J Forens Sci 45:669-673[Medline]
Kulski JK, Pryce T (1996) Preparation of mycobacterial DNA from blood culture fluids by simple alkali wash and heat lysis method for PCR detection. J Clin Microbiol 34:1985-1991[Abstract]
Masuda N, Ohnishi T, Kawamoto S, Monden M, Okubo K (1999) Analysis of chemical modification of RNA from formalin-fixed samples and optimization of molecular biologyy applications for such samples. Nucleic Acids Res 27:4436-4443
McGhee JD, von Hippel PH (1977a) Formaldehyde as a probe of DNA structure. 3. Equilibrium denaturation of DNA and synthetic polynucleotides. Biochemistry 16:3267-3275[Medline]
McGhee JD, von Hippel PH (1977b) Formaldehyde as a probe of DNA structure. 4. Mechanism of the initial reaction of formaldehyde with DNA. Biochemistry 16:3276-3293[Medline]
Oliver KR, Heavens RP, Sirinathsinghji DJS (1997) Quantitative comparison of pretreatment regimens used to sensitive in situ hybridization using oligonucleotide probes on paraffin-embedded brain tissue. J Histochem Cytochem 45:1707-1713
Rudbeck LDJ (1998) Rapid, simple alkaline extraction of human genomic DNA from whole blood, buccal epithelial cells, semen and forensic stains for PCR. BioTechniques 25:588-592[Medline]
Sepp R, Szabo I, Uda H, Sakamoto H (1994) Rapid techniques for DNA extraction from routinely processed archival tissue for use in PCR. J Clin Pathol 47:318-323[Abstract]
Shi S-R, Cote RJ, Taylor CR (2001a) Antigen retrieval immunohistochemistry and molecular morphology in the year 2001. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 9:107-116[Medline]
Shi S-R, Cote RJ, Taylor CR (2001b) Antigen retrieval techniques: current perspectives. J Histochem Cytochem 49:931-937
Shi S-R, Gu J, Taylor CR (2000a) Antigen Retrieval Techniques: Immunohistochemistry and Molecular Morphology. Natick, MA, Eaton Publishing
Shi S-R, Gu J, Turrens F, Cote RJ, Taylor CR (2000b) Development of the antigen retrieval technique: philosophy and theoretical base. In Shi SR Gu J, Taylor CR, eds. Antigen Retrieval Techniques: Immunohistochemistry and Molecular Morphology. Natick, MA, Eaton Publishing, 17-39
Shi SR, Imam SA, Young L, Cote RJ, Taylor CR (1995) Antigen retrieval immunohistochemistry under the influence of pH using monoclonal antibodies. J Histochem Cytochem 43:193-201
Shi SR, Key ME, Kalra KL (1991) Antigen retrieval in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues: an enhancement method for immunohistochemical staining based on microwave oven heating of tissue sections. J Histochem Cytochem 39:741-748[Abstract]
Shibata D (1994) Extraction of DNA from paraffin-embedded tissue for analysis by polymerase chain reaction: new tricks from an old friend. Hum Pathol 25:561-563[Medline]
Sibony M, Commo F, Callard P, Gasc J-M (1995) Enhancement of mRNA in situ hybridization signal by microwave heating. Lab Invest 73:586-591[Medline]
Taylor CR (1994) The current role of immunohistochemistry in diagnostic pathology. Adv Pathol Lab Med 7:59-105
Taylor CR (1996) Paraffin section immunocytochemistry for estrogen receptor. The time has come. Cancer 77:2419-2422[Medline]
Valsecchi E (1998) Tissue boiling: a short-cut in DNA extraction for large-scale population screenings. Mol Ecol 7:1243-1245[Medline]
Wang H, Qi M, Cutler AJ (1993) A simple method of preparing plant samples for PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 21:4153-4154[Medline]
Yamashita K, Yoshida T, Shinoda H, Okayasu I (2001) Novel method for simultaneous analysis of p53 and K-ras mutations and p53 protein expression in single histologic sections. Arch Pathol Lab Med 125:347-352[Medline]