Large cutaneous rabbit papillomas that persist during cyclosporin A treatment can regress spontaneously after cessation of immunosuppression

Jiafen Hu1,2, Xuwen Peng3, Nancy M. Cladel1,2, Martin D. Pickel1,2 and Neil D. Christensen1,2,4

1 The Jake Gittlen Cancer Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
2 Department of Pathology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
3 Department of Comparative Medicine, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
4 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA

Correspondence
Neil D. Christensen
ndc1{at}psu.edu


   ABSTRACT
Top
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Cottontail rabbit papillomavirus (CRPV)-induced papillomas can progress into malignant carcinomas, remain persistent or regress. Both host immunity and virus genetic background play critical roles in these events. To test how host immunity influences CRPV-induced papilloma evolution, both EIII/JC (inbred) and New Zealand White (outbred) rabbits were treated with an immunosuppressive drug, cyclosporin A (CsA), for 80 days and the regression of three regressive constructs, H.CRPVr (a CRPV regressive strain), H.CRPVp-E6r (a progressive strain with regressive E6) and H.CRPVp-CE6rm (H.CRPVp with the carboxyl terminal of regressive E6, containing mutations at amino acid residues E252G, G258D and S259P) was checked. Papillomas induced by H.CRPVr and H.CRPVp-E6r on control inbred and outbred rabbits regressed totally around week 8, whereas papillomas on all CsA-treated rabbits grew progressively. After cessation of CsA treatment, papillomas began to regress in six outbred rabbits: 14 of 18 papillomas induced by CRPVr, 11 of 18 papillomas induced by H.CRPVp-E6r and eight of 10 papillomas induced by H.CRPVp-CE6rm regressed around week 21. In four CsA-treated inbred rabbits, two of 17 papillomas induced by H.CRPVr and one of 17 papillomas induced by H.CRPVp-E6r regressed. These data indicate that papillomas induced by a regressive CRPV strain can become persistent in the transiently immunosuppressed host. However, returning immunity can lead to regression and clearance of large papillomas (with increased antigenicity) in an outbred population, whilst these same antigenic papillomas persist in inbred rabbits.


   INTRODUCTION
Top
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Papillomaviruses are small DNA tumour viruses that are correlated strongly with cervical carcinomas in human populations (Walboomers et al., 1999; Furumoto & Irahara, 2002). The cottontail rabbit papillomavirus (CRPV)/rabbit model is used widely to explore the interaction between host and viral infection and to develop vaccines against virus infections (Orth et al., 1980; Brandsma, 1994; Christensen et al., 1999). CRPV-induced skin lesions can regress spontaneously, remain persistent or become malignant. These characteristics resemble both high- and low-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infections. Previous studies have shown that tumour progression depends on both the host genetic constitution and virus genetic variability (Han et al., 1992; Breitburd et al., 1996; Salmon et al., 1997, 2000; Hu et al., 2002a). Thus, investigations on the effect of the interaction between host immunity and virus genetic variability on tumour evolution are possible with the availability of different virus phenotypes and rabbits with different genetic backgrounds.

Our previous studies have demonstrated that CRPV containing the regressive E6 gene plays a dominant role in controlling the spontaneous regression of CRPV-induced papillomas (Hu et al., 2002a). However, 100 % papilloma regression was not always achieved, even by the regressive-strain infections (Christensen, N. D., Hu, J. & Cladel, N. M., unpublished observations). Incomplete wart regressions on the same host by a particular virus infection may be due to incomplete host immunity. This phenomenon has been well-characterized in vaccination studies (Sundaram et al., 1998; Han et al., 1999; Hu et al., 2002b). Different regression rates or phenotypes shown by the same virus infection in different hosts may result from inherent differences in host immunity (Salmon et al., 2000; Hu et al., 2002a). The link between papilloma regression and progression to the rabbit major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II alleles DRA and DQA was reported in a previous study (Han et al., 1992). Additional evidence demonstrated that rabbits homozygous for the DRA.D–DQA.B haplotype were preferentially associated with early regression, whilst those homozygous for the DRA.C–DQA.G haplotype were preferentially linked to wart persistence (Salmon et al., 2000). An association between HLA type and human papillomavirus-induced cervical cancer has been reported (Bavinck et al., 1993; Davidson et al., 2003). In addition, malignant carcinomas associated with low-risk HPV types, such as HPV6 and HPV11, have been documented occasionally (Turazza et al., 1997).

Studies using different viral antigens as immunogens have demonstrated that enhanced host immunity increased virion- or viral DNA-induced papilloma regression rates (Furumoto & Irahara, 2002). Other studies have demonstrated an increase of different types of HPV infection in renal-transplant recipients (Tieben et al., 1994) and described the outgrowth of HPV-induced lesions in cyclosporin A (CsA)-treated transplant patients (Euvrard et al., 2003). However, systematic documentation of the outcome of these HPV infections following cessation of CsA treatment is not presented in the literature. To investigate the impact of transient immune suppression on virus-induced papilloma evolution, we used CsA, an immunosuppressant that has been shown to inhibit lymphokine production by helper T cells in vitro and in vivo (Andrus & Lafferty, 1981; Ali et al., 1982; Dupont et al., 1985). CsA has been widely used clinically to alleviate tissue allograft rejection (Jenkins et al., 1988).

To determine the impact of genetic differences in host and virus during evolution of papillomavirus-induced tumours in transiently immunosuppressed animals, we used two rabbit strains [outbred and inbred New Zealand White (NZW)] and three CRPV variants (H.CRPVr, H.CRPVp-E6r and H.CRPVp-CE6rm). Outbred rabbits were purchased from a commercial supplier, whereas inbred rabbits were bred and maintained in our animal core facility. The three CRPV variants demonstrated a regressive phenotype in both outbred and inbred rabbits. These strains included H.CRPVr (Salmon et al., 2000), H.CRPVp-E6r (H.CRPVp containing the carboxyl-terminal portion of the H.CRPVr E6 gene; Hu et al., 2002a) and H.CRPVp-CE6rm [H.CRPVp containing point mutations at three residues (E252G, G258D and S259P) in the E6 gene]. As this latter construct was not tested in our previous studies (Hu et al., 2002a), but was highly regressive compared with other variants that we constructed, we chose to include the construct in the current study.


   METHODS
Top
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Preparation of plasmids containing mutant CRPV genomes.
H.CRPVp (Fig. 1a) and H.CRPVr (Fig. 1b) were cloned into pUC19 and utilized as described in a previous study (Hu et al., 2002a). H.CRPVp-CE6rE252G258S259GDP was generated by mutagenesis based on the construct H.CRPVp-E6r (Fig. 1c) and was identified as H.CRPVp-CE6rm (Fig. 1d). Several variants in the carboxyl-terminal region of the hybrid CRPV E6 gene (Fig. 1c) were prepared, of which H.CRPVp-CE6rm was one new construct that was chosen for this study, based on high levels of regression when this E6 mutation was placed into the H.CRPVp genome (Hu, J., unpublished data). All amino acid changes in this carboxyl-terminal portion of E6 were designed as back mutations, representing amino acid mutations that were positionally present in the E6 gene from the progressive strain of CRPV (Fig. 1; Salmon et al. 2000; Hu et al., 2002a). The mutations were confirmed by DNA sequencing in the core facility of the College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, PA, USA. The constructs were prepared by using a Maxiprep kit (Qiagen), purified by using caesium chloride density-gradient ultracentrifugation and adjusted to a final concentration of 200 µg ml–1 for rabbit skin inoculations.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Design of chimeric CRPV E6 genes used in this study. Hershey CRPV persistent strain (H.CRPVp) E6 (a) and regressive strain (H.CRPVr) E6 (b) genes were separated and cloned in our laboratory. H.CRPVp-CE6rm (d) was constructed based on the chimeric E6 in (c), in which the carboxyl terminal of H.CRPVp E6 was replaced by the corresponding region of H.CRPVr E6, containing three additional mutations at amino acid residues 252 (E to G), 258 (G to D) and 259 (S to P) (underlined). All constructs were sequenced prior to infection of rabbit skin.

 
CsA treatment of both outbred and inbred rabbits.
Six outbred and four inbred rabbits were injected subcutaneously with CsA for 80 days, the time reported to be sufficient for the suppression of host immunity (Shah et al., 1992). The doses for CsA injection were 15 mg kg–1 (days 1–6) daily, then 20 mg kg–1 (days 7–29) and 15 mg kg–1 (days 30–80) twice weekly. Rabbits were weighed monthly and weights (kg) were recorded.

Inoculation of rabbit skin with plasmid viral DNA.
NZW outbred rabbits were purchased from Covance and EIII/JC inbred rabbits were bred and maintained in the animal facilities of the Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine. The Institutional Animal Care and Use committee of the Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, approved all animal-care and handling procedures. Viral DNA constructs (10 µg per site) were placed onto scarified sites in 50 µl volumes as described previously (Hu et al., 2002a). For inbred rabbits, four left-side sites and four right-side sites were challenged for H.CRPVr and H.CRPVp-E6r, respectively. For outbred rabbits, three of six CsA-treated rabbits were challenged at three sites each with H.CRPVr and H.CRPVp-E6r, whereas the remaining three rabbits were challenged at four additional sites with H.CRPVp-CE6rm.

Flow-cytometry analysis.
Peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) were isolated from 10 ml blood. In brief, blood was diluted 1 : 2 with RPMI 1640 medium buffered with 10 mM HEPES and then underlaid with 10 ml Lympholyte-Rabbit (Cedarlane) and centrifuged at 1500 g at room temperature for 30 min. PBLs were collected at the interface and then diluted 1 : 2 with RPMI 1640 medium and centrifuged at 1500 g for 10 min. Contaminating red blood cells were lysed with ACK lysing buffer (Biofluids). PBLs were washed three times with RPMI 1640 medium and then counted. 1x107 PBLs were cultured in Eagle's medium [10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS), 10 mM HEPES, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 0·1 mM non-essential amino acids, 50 µM 2-mercaptoethanol, 100 U penicillin ml–1 and 100 µg streptomycin ml–1] for about 3 h to allow time for optimal membrane-protein expression. After washing three times with PBS containing 2 % FBS, 1x106 PBLs were suspended in 30 µl PBS and incubated with 1 µl mAbs: mouse anti-rabbit CD4+ conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (RDI-CBL1400FT; Research Diagnostics) and mouse anti-rabbit CD8+ conjugated with FITC (RDI-CBL1402FT; Research Diagnostics) T-cell antibodies. The populations of cell-membrane markers on PBLs were determined by one-colour FSCAN flow-cytometry analysis (Hershey Medical Center Core Facility).

Confirmation of viral DNA in papillomas by DNA sequencing.
Biopsies of papillomas were collected monthly from rabbits. Total DNA was extracted by using a Qiagen DNeasy tissue kit. CRPV E6 plus E7 DNA fragments were amplified from each sample and partially purified by using a Qiagen PCR clean kit prior to sequencing. DNA sequencing was performed in the core facility of Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine. DNA alignment was analysed with DNAMAN software (version 5.2.9; Lynnon Biosoft).

Papilloma size determination and statistical analysis.
Papillomas were measured in three dimensions (lengthxwidthxheight) in mm, from which a geometric mean diameter (GMD) was calculated. Measurements were conducted weekly, beginning 3 weeks after initial viral DNA challenge. Data were represented as mean±SEM GMDs for papillomas per construct per group of animals. Statistical significance was determined by unpaired t-test comparisons. Regression rates occurring from H.CRPVr, H.CRPVp-E6r and H.CRPVp-CE6rm genomes on animals treated with CsA were compared with regression rates of papillomas from untreated animals by using Fisher's exact probability test for small samples.


   RESULTS
Top
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Weight gain of rabbits treated with CsA
CsA is an immunosuppressant that is used in clinical organ transplantation. Some side effects have been noticed for this drug. To determine whether similar side effects occurred in CsA-treated rabbits, monthly records of body weight gain of these rabbits were obtained. Weight gain of CsA-treated rabbits was significantly slower than that of the control rabbits (P<0·03, unpaired t-test; data not shown). After termination of CsA treatment, rabbits began to gain weight. No difference in mean body weight could be found between these two groups 5 months later.

CsA decreased CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell levels in PBLs
CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are important for host defence against viral infections. The levels of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in PBLs reflect levels of host immune response to pathogen invasion. CsA had been demonstrated to delay the maturation of thymus T cells. In our current study, significantly lower levels of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were found in CsA-treated rabbits than in control rabbits (Fig. 2; P<0·05, t-test) 14 and 80 days after CsA injection. However, the levels of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in CsA-treated rabbits returned to normal 2 months after CsA treatment was terminated (data not shown).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell levels in CsA-treated and control rabbits. Significantly lower numbers of both CD4+ (open bars) and CD8+ (filled bars) T cells were detected compared with those of the control rabbits after CsA treatment for 14–80 days (P<0·05, unpaired t-test). The numbers returned to normal levels about 2 months after cessation of CsA treatment.

 
Papilloma outgrowth in CsA-treated and non-treated outbred rabbits
In experiment 1, three outbred rabbits were treated with CsA and challenged with H.CRPVr and H.CRPVp-E6r. Two rabbits that were challenged with H.CRPVr and H.CRPVp-E6r, but that received no CsA, were used as controls. Papillomas appeared at the same time point (around week 3 after challenge) on both CsA-treated and control rabbits. In the control group, papillomas induced by both H.CRPVr and H.CRPVp-E6r began to regress and disappeared at all challenge sites around week 10. In contrast, papillomas on CsA-treated rabbits continued to grow for the duration of CsA treatment. Stronger immune responses to H.CRPVr-induced papillomas versus H.CRPVp-E6r-induced papillomas were evident, based on papilloma size and regression rates. Papillomas induced by H.CRPVr were significantly smaller than those induced by H.CRPVp-E6r (Figs 3 and 4; P<0·05, t-test). Papillomas induced by H.CRPVr at six sites on two rabbits regressed around week 16 and six papillomas induced by H.CRPVp-E6r on two rabbits regressed around week 21 (Fig. 5). One rabbit failed to eradicate any papillomas, although the mean size was significantly reduced when compared with papilloma size at the time of CsA treatment (Fig. 3; Table 1; P<0·05, t-test).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Evolution of papillomas induced by H.CRPVr (black bars) and H.CRPVp-E6r (grey bars) in CsA-treated outbred rabbits. CsA treatment was terminated after 80 days. Six rabbits in two experiments were challenged with both H.CRPVr and H.CRPVp-E6r at left- and right-back sites, respectively. *P<0·05 compared with H.CRPVr, unpaired t-test.

 


View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Regression or size reduction of papillomas induced by H.CRPVr (upper sites) and H.CRPVp-E6r (lower sites) in outbred rabbits after CsA cessation. About 84 days after viral DNA challenge, papillomas induced by H.CRPVp-E6r were large in size in all three rabbits (C0078, C0079 and C0080) compared with those induced by H.CRPVr. At day 147, these large papillomas on rabbits C0078 and C0079 regressed, whereas papillomas induced by both constructs were significantly smaller on rabbit C0080.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Papilloma outcome following CsA treatment and infection with various CRPV genomes (NZW outbred and EIII/JC inbred rabbits)

Regression rate was calculated as regression sites/papilloma sites.

 
In experiment 2, three additional outbred rabbits were treated with CsA using the same protocol. Similar patterns of growth and regression were found for papillomas induced by H.CRPVr and H.CRPVp-E6r (Fig. 3); however, all papillomas induced by H.CRPVr were able to regress and five of nine papillomas induced by H.CRPVp-E6r regressed at week 21. In this experiment, the CsA-treated rabbits were challenged with a third regressive construct (H.CRPVp-CE6rm). Papillomas induced with this third construct did not show as vigorous a regression rate when compared with H.CRPVr and H.CRPVp-E6r (Table 1). However, after cessation of CsA treatment, papillomas induced by H.CRPVp-CE6rm began to shrink and they disappeared around week 21. No significant difference in papilloma regression rate was found between H.CRPVp-CE6rm (eight of 10) and H.CRPVr (eight of nine) or H.CRPVp-E6r (five of nine) at week 21 (Table 1; P>0·05, Fisher's exact test). No significant difference in regression rate of papillomas induced by each construct was found between the CsA-treated group and control group (Table 1; P>0·05, Fisher's exact test).

Papilloma outgrowth in CsA-treated and non-treated EIII/JC inbred rabbits
To explore whether immunosuppression delayed regression of papillomas induced by H.CRPVr and H.CRPVp-E6r in EIII/JC inbred rabbits, eight rabbits were tested using the same protocol as described for the outbred rabbits. Four CsA-treated (17 challenge sites for each construct) and four control (16 challenge sites for each construct) rabbits were challenged with both H.CRPVr and H.CRPVp-E6r.

In the control group, papillomas induced by both H.CRPVr and H.CRPVp-E6r appeared around week 3 on all rabbits and began to regress and disappeared at all challenge sites around week 10. In contrast, papillomas on CsA-treated rabbits appeared at the same time and continued to grow. Although the growth rate was reduced after termination of CsA treatment, papillomas remained for several weeks. A significant difference was found for papilloma regression rates between CsA-treated rabbits and control rabbits induced by both constructs (Table 1; P<0·05, Fisher's exact test).

Papillomas induced by H.CRPVr were significantly smaller than those induced by H.CRPVp-E6r (Figs 6 and 7; P<0·05, t-test) at most time points. One of the CsA-treated rabbits (C0364) developed significantly smaller papillomas compared with the others. At week 21 for rabbit C0364, two papillomas induced by H.CRPVr and one induced by H.CRPVp-E6r regressed and the remaining ones were very small in size. However, papillomas on the remaining three rabbits continued to grow and were comparable in size to those that were formed during CsA treatment (Fig. 6).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Evolution of papillomas induced by H.CRPVr (black bars) and H.CRPVp-E6r (grey bars) in CsA-treated EIII/JC inbred rabbits. CsA treatment was terminated after 80 days. Four rabbits were challenged with both H.CRPVr and H.CRPVp-E6r at left and right back sites, respectively. Papillomas induced by both constructs continued to grow on all four rabbits at weeks 9, 16, 21. None of the rabbits were free of papillomas at any of the time points. Papillomas induced by H.CRPVp-E6r were significantly larger than those induced by H.CRPVr at different time points on all four rabbits (*P<0·05, unpaired t-test).

 
When compared with the CsA-treated outbred rabbits, significantly lower papilloma regression rates were found for papillomas induced by both H.CRPVr and H.CRPVp-E6r (P=0·015 and 0·017, respectively; Table 1).

Viral DNA stability in papillomas induced by different viral constructs
Papillomas induced by a regressive viral strain that becomes persistent might be a consequence of mutational changes in the viral genome, with selection of antigenic-escape variants. To determine whether any mutations had occurred in the persistent papillomas, we collected a biopsy of each papilloma from each CsA-treated rabbit (all the papillomas on three outbred and four inbred rabbits) weekly until week 10 and monthly from that time point on. The genetic sequence that we checked was E6 plus E7, which is the region that allows us to discriminate between the constructs that we used (H.CRPVr contains regressive E6 and E7, whereas H.CRPVp-E6r contains regressive E6 and progressive E7). All papillomas tested retained the original DNA sequences for the challenge constructs.


   DISCUSSION
Top
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Our current study investigated the impact of transient immunosuppression by CsA treatment on infection by three CRPV regressive strains in both EIII/JC inbred and outbred rabbits. As expected, papillomas induced by both H.CRPVr and H.CRPVp-E6r became persistent in both inbred and outbred rabbits that were treated with CsA and regressed completely in non-treated control rabbits. Interestingly, after cessation of CsA treatment, five of the six CsA-treated outbred rabbits were able to completely or partially eliminate papillomas induced by H.CRPVr, H.CRPVp-E6r and H.CRPVp-CE6rm; however, only one of the four CsA-treated inbred rabbits elicited incomplete immunity that resulted in partial regression of papillomas induced by both H.CRPVr and H.CRPVp-E6r, whereas papillomas on the remaining three inbred rabbits remained persistent. The most striking result is that, after termination of CsA treatment, returning host immunity elicited by infection of both constructs could eradicate not only small, but also large, tumours in outbred rabbits. For example, two CsA-treated outbred rabbits (C0078 and C0079) eliminated large tumours up to a GMD of 27 mm (Figs 3 and 5). This result is striking, as many immunotherapeutic studies have demonstrated that immune-mediated cure of tumours is difficult once they reach a large size. In support of this latter observation is the outcome of large papillomas in the inbred rabbits, which persisted after cessation of CsA treatment, despite papillomas that are induced by these CRPV genomes being strongly regressive upon initial infection and thus when small in size.

We previously demonstrated that regressive E6 played a dominant role in triggering papilloma regression in both inbred and outbred rabbits (Hu et al., 2002a). The current study further supports this finding. The two regressive constructs that were tested in this study (H.CRPVr and H.CRPVp-E6r) did not show any differences in tumour outgrowth and regression in either inbred or outbred rabbits with intact host immunity. This implied that only the regressive E6 was strong enough to induce immune responses leading to the elimination of papillomas in these rabbits. However, in CsA-treated (immunocompromised) animals, remaining host immunity against viral DNA infection generated by H.CRPVr was much stronger than that induced by H.CRPVp-E6r, as manifested in earlier regressions and smaller papillomas (Table 1, Figs 4 and 7). Therefore, other genes or regions in the H.CRPVr genome must have played an additional role in triggering regression in these rabbits.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Papilloma growth rates in outbred rabbits. Papillomas induced by both H.CRPVr and H.CRPVp-E6r appeared around week 3 in both the control and CsA-treated groups. After week 6, papillomas in the control group began to regress and they disappeared around week 8–10; papillomas in the CsA-treated rabbits, however, continued to grow and reached a peak around week 9. After week 9 (the time of cessation of CsA treatment), papillomas began to shrink and most papillomas regressed completely.

 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Papilloma growth rates in EIII/JC inbred rabbits. Papillomas induced by both H.CRPVr and H.CRPVp-E6r appeared around week 3 in both control and CsA-treated rabbits. After week 6, papillomas in the control group began to regress and disappeared around week 8–10; papillomas in the CsA-treated group, however, continued to grow. After CsA-treatment cessation (about week 9), papillomas persisted until the experiment was terminated.

 
CsA has been used clinically during transplantation. CsA is able to inhibit keratinocyte cytokine-gene expression and T-cell activation (Andrus & Lafferty, 1981; Won et al., 1994). We found that the levels of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in PBLs decreased in rabbits during the 80 days of CsA treatment. However, these levels returned to normal by 2 months after the cessation of CsA treatment (data not shown). Some side effects that correlated with CsA treatment were recorded clinically. In our study, we also noticed that rabbits injected with CsA had a lower intake of food and less weight gain when compared with the controls. After termination of CsA treatment, no difference in weight gain could be found between CsA-treated and non-treated rabbits. CsA treatment effectively suppressed host immunity in both inbred and outbred rabbits. Collectively, because of the immunosuppressive effect of CsA administration, both inbred and outbred rabbits showed weaker immune responses to both H.CRPVr and H.CRPVp-E6r infection than did control rabbits. However, after CsA treatment was ended, both inbred and outbred rabbits regained partial immunity, leading to reduction in papilloma size. Although regression of H.CRPVr- and H.CRPVp-E6r-induced papillomas was delayed or prevented by CsA treatment, five of six outbred rabbits showed gradual recovery from this immunosuppressive effect and were subsequently able to eliminate both H.CRPVr- and H.CRPVp-E6r-induced papillomas. This finding implied that, once host immunity was activated appropriately, effective cure of large lesions was possible. In contrast, inbred rabbits showed much slower anti-papilloma effects following recovery from CsA treatment. Only one of four rabbits achieved partial regression several weeks after cessation of CsA treatment. Papillomas on the other three inbred rabbits became slightly smaller, but then stabilized and persisted until the experiment was terminated. As discussed previously, we found that the MHC class II genetic constitution of the inbred rabbits was not commonly found in outbred populations. In this study, both inbred and outbred rabbits showed the same growth pattern to infection with both H.CRPVr and H.CRPVp-E6r. However, when host immunity was suppressed temporarily by CsA, the two strains of rabbits showed different responses to these regressive strains, by either a delay or a change in their regressive phenotypes. In addition, individual differences were noticed in the same strain of the animals. For example, the outcome of papillomas on outbred rabbit C0080 was quite different from those of the other outbred rabbits, but similar to that of inbred rabbit C0364. These data imply that there were differences between these two strains of rabbits and between individuals from the same strain following recovery from transient immunosuppression. These observations are relevant to patients undergoing different immunosuppressive regimes and the outcome of HPV infections following removal of immunosuppression, despite the relative antigenicity of the HPV infection.

In summary, short-term suppression of host immunity by CsA delayed papilloma regression in NWZ rabbits and changed the regression phenotype of regressive papillomavirus strains in EIII/JC inbred rabbits.


   ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
This work was supported by National Cancer Institute grant RO1 CA47622 from the National Institutes of Health and the Jake Gittlen Memorial Golf Tournament.


   REFERENCES
Top
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Ali, A. T. M. M., Morley, J. & Rumjanek, V. M. (1982). Cyclosporin-A inhibits accumulation of lymphocytes within lymph nodes. Immunology 47, 345–349.[Medline]

Andrus, L. & Lafferty, K. J. (1981). Inhibition of T-cell activity by cyclosporin A. Scand J Immunol 15, 449–458.[Medline]

Bavinck, J. N., Gissman, L., Claas, F. H. & 7 other authors (1993). Relation between skin cancer, humoral responses to human papillomaviruses, and HLA class II molecules in renal transplant recipients. J Immunol 151, 1579–1586.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Brandsma, J. L. (1994). Animal models of human-papillomavirus-associated oncogenesis. Intervirology 37, 189–200.[Medline]

Breitburd, F., Ramoz, N., Salmon, J. & Orth, G. (1996). HLA control in the progression of human papillomavirus infections. Semin Cancer Biol 7, 359–371.[CrossRef][Medline]

Christensen, N. D., Han, R. & Kreider, J. W. (1999). Cottontail rabbit papillomavirus. In Persistent Viral Infections, pp. 485–502. Edited by R. Ahmed & I. S. Y. Chen. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

Davidson, E. J., Davidson, J. A., Sterling, J. C., Baldwin, P. J. W., Kitchener, H. C. & Stern, P. L. (2003). Association between human leukocyte antigen polymorphism and human papillomavirus 16-positive vulval intraepithelial neoplasia in British women. Cancer Res 63, 400–403.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dupont, E., Huygen, K., Schandene, L., Vandercruys, M., Palfliet, K. & Wybran, J. (1985). Influence of in vivo immunosuppressive drugs on production of lymphokines. Transplantation 39, 143–147.[Medline]

Euvrard, S., Kanitakis, J. & Claudy, A. (2003). Skin cancers after organ transplantation. N Engl J Med 348, 1681–1691.[Free Full Text]

Furumoto, H. & Irahara, M. (2002). Human papilloma virus (HPV) and cervical cancer. J Med Invest 49, 124–133.[Medline]

Han, R., Breitburd, F., Marche, P. N. & Orth, G. (1992). Linkage of regression and malignant conversion of rabbit viral papillomas to MHC class II genes. Nature 356, 66–68.[CrossRef][Medline]

Han, R., Cladel, N. M., Reed, C. A., Peng, X. & Christensen, N. D. (1999). Protection of rabbits from viral challenge by gene gun-based intracutaneous vaccination with a combination of cottontail rabbit papillomavirus E1, E2, E6, and E7 genes. J Virol 73, 7039–7043.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hu, J., Cladel, N. M., Pickel, M. D. & Christensen, N. D. (2002a). Amino acid residues in the carboxy-terminal region of cottontail rabbit papillomavirus E6 influence spontaneous regression of cutaneous papillomas. J Virol 76, 11801–11808.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hu, J., Han, R., Cladel, N. M., Pickel, M. D. & Christensen, N. D. (2002b). Intracutaneous DNA vaccination with the E8 gene of cottontail rabbit papillomavirus induces protective immunity against virus challenge in rabbits. J Virol 76, 6453–6459.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jenkins, M. K., Schwartz, R. H. & Pardoll, D. M. (1988). Effects of cyclosporine A on T cell development and clonal deletion. Science 241, 1655–1658.[Medline]

Orth, G., Favre, M., Breitburd, F., Croissant, O., Jablonska, S., Obalek, S., Jarzabek-Chorzelska, M. & Rzesa, G. (1980). Epidermodysplasia verruciformis: a model for the role of papillomaviruses in human cancer. In Viruses in Naturally Occurring Cancers, vol. 7, pp. 259–282. Edited by M. Essex, G. Todaro & H. zur Hausen. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.

Salmon, J., Ramoz, N., Cassonnet, P., Orth, G. & Breitburd, F. (1997). A cottontail rabbit papillomavirus strain (CRPVb) with strikingly divergent E6 and E7 oncoproteins: an insight in the evolution of papillomaviruses. Virology 235, 228–234.[CrossRef][Medline]

Salmon, J., Nonnenmacher, M., Cazé, S., Flamant, P., Croissant, O., Orth, G. & Breitburd, F. (2000). Variation in the nucleotide sequence of cottontail rabbit papillomavirus a and b subtypes affects wart regression and malignant transformation and level of viral replication in domestic rabbits. J Virol 74, 10766–10777.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shah, A. K., Brundage, R. C., Gratwohl, A. & Sawchuk, R. J. (1992). Pharmacokinetic model for subcutaneous absorption of cyclosporine in the rabbit during chronic treatment. J Pharm Sci 81, 491–495.[Medline]

Sundaram, P., Tigelaar, R. E., Xiao, W. & Brandsma, J. L. (1998). Intracutaneous vaccination of rabbits with the E6 gene of cottontail rabbit papillomavirus provides partial protection against virus challenge. Vaccine 16, 613–623.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tieben, L. M., Berkhout, R. J. M., Smits, H. L., Bouwes Bavinck, J. N., Vermeer, B. J., Bruijn, J. A., Van der Woude, F. J. & ter Schegget, J. (1994). Detection of epidermodysplasia verruciformis-like human papillomavirus types in malignant and premalignant skin lesions of renal transplant recipients. Br J Dermatol 131, 226–230.[Medline]

Turazza, E., Lapena, A., Sprovieri, O., Torres, C. P., Gurucharri, C., Maciel, A., Lema, B., Grinstein, S. & Kahn, T. (1997). Low-risk human papillomavirus types 6 and 11 associated with carcinomas of the genital and upper aero-digestive tract. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 76, 271–276.[Medline]

Walboomers, J. M. M., Jacobs, M. V., Manos, M. M. & 7 other authors (1999). Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol 189, 12–19.[CrossRef][Medline]

Won, Y.-H., Sauder, D. N. & McKenzie, R. C. (1994). Cyclosporin A inhibits keratinocyte cytokine gene expression. Br J Dermatol 130, 312–319.[Medline]

Received 15 July 2004; accepted 14 October 2004.



This Article
Abstract
Full Text (PDF)
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Citation Map
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Articles by Hu, J.
Articles by Christensen, N. D.
Articles citing this Article
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Hu, J.
Articles by Christensen, N. D.
Agricola
Articles by Hu, J.
Articles by Christensen, N. D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS