Departamento de Genética y Fisiología Molecular, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 510-3, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62250, Mexico1
Laboratoire de Génie Protéique et Cellulaire, Université de la Rochelle, La Rochelle cedex 01, France2
Laboratoire de Virologie et Immunologie Moléculaires, INRA, Domaine de Vilvert, 78352 Jouy-en-Josas cedex, France3
Author for correspondence: Carlos Arias. Fax +52 73 172388. e-mail arias{at}ibt.unam.mx
![]() |
Abstract |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Rotaviruses replicate in the cytoplasm of cells, and viral RNA packaging, assortment and replication, as well as assembly of the double-layered particles is thought to occur in viroplasms, large cytoplasmic electrodense structures rich in viral proteins and RNA (Estes & Cohen, 1989 ). The structural proteins VP1, VP2, VP3 and VP6, and the non-structural proteins NSP2, NSP5 and NSP6, are all localized to viroplasms (Estes & Cohen, 1989
; González et al., 1998
; Patton, 1995
).
Patton and coworkers characterized macromolecular structures that are intermediates in rotavirus replication (RIs) (Patton, 1995 ). Three distinct RIs were separated by gel electrophoresis, which were relatively enriched in different sets of proteins: the precore RI (VP1, VP3, NSP1 and NSP3), the core RI (VP1, VP2, VP3, NSP2 and NSP5) and the VP6 RI (VP1, VP2, VP3, VP6 and NSP2). All three RIs were shown to have associated RNA replicase activity (Gallegos & Patton, 1989
). In addition, a viral RNAprotein complex with RNA replication activity, and containing NSP2, VP1, VP2 and VP6 proteins, was precipitated from rotavirus-infected cells by using an NSP2-specific monoclonal antibody (Aponte et al., 1996
). Despite the multiple protein interactions that should occur in these RIs to coordinate the RNA replication and morphogenesis of the virions, specific proteinprotein contacts in either viroplasms or the isolated replication complexes have been poorly studied.
Among the non-structural proteins present in the identified RIs is NSP5, an O-glycosylated phosphoprotein of 197200 aa, with putative autocatalytic kinase activity (Blackhall et al., 1997 ; González & Burrone, 1991
; Poncet et al., 1997
; Welch et al., 1989
). Depending on its degree of phosphorylation, NSP5 can exist as several isoforms with molecular masses of 26, 28 and 3034 kDa (Afrikanova et al., 1996
; Blackhall et al., 1997
; Poncet et al., 1997
). This protein, which is able to form homo-oligomers (González et al., 1998
; Poncet et al., 1997
), has been shown to interact with NSP2 (Afrikanova et al., 1998
; Poncet et al., 1997
), and this association was found to up-regulate the NSP5 hyperphosphorylation activity, and to allow the formation of viroplasm-like structures (Afrikanova et al., 1998
; Fabbretti et al., 1999
). NSP5 has also been proposed to interact with the virus polymerase VP1 (Afrikanova et al., 1998
), and the non-structural 11 kDa protein NSP6 (González et al., 1998
; Mattion et al., 1991
). NSP5 and NSP6 are encoded in alternative open reading frames (ORFs) of the genomic dsRNA segment 11 (Mattion et al., 1991
).
In this work we describe the mapping of the domains of NSP5 responsible for homomultimerization, and for the interaction with NSP6, and report the existence of a correlation between the ability of NSP5 to self-associate and its capacity to be hyperphosphorylated.
![]() |
Methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Construction of expression vectors.
All the NSP5 and NSP6 gene expression constructs were derived from the porcine rotavirus YM gene 11 (664 nucleotides long) cloned in plasmid pGEM-3Z (López & Arias, 1993 ), using standard recombination techniques. This plasmid is referred to in this work as YM11/pGM. A cDNA fragment encoding the 197 aa ORF of YM NSP5 (contained between nucleotides 22 and 612 of gene 11) was obtained by digestion of YM11/pGM with Eco47III (which cuts at nucleotide 9 of dsRNA 11) and SmaI (located in the vector polylinker). This DNA fragment was further digested with DraI and BclI (which cut at nucleotides 68 and 411, respectively, of YM gene 11) to obtain the 92 aa out-of-phase (+1) ORF that encodes NSP6 (comprised of nucleotides 80355 of gene 11). (Mattion et al., 1991
). For the yeast two-hybrid assay, the NSP5 and NSP6 cDNAs fragments described above were cloned into yeast vectors pGBT9 and pGAD424 (Clontech), to be expressed, respectively, as fusion polypeptides with the DNA binding (BD) and activation (AD) domains of the yeast activator GAL4. In this way plasmids NSP5/pGB, NSP6/pGB, NSP5/pGD and NSP6/pGD were generated. In addition, the NSP5 and NSP6 cDNAs were cloned into the multiple cloning site of yeast vectors pAS2-1 and pACT2 (Clontech) to generate plasmids NSP5/pAS2-1 and NSP6/pACT2, which overproduce the NSP5-BD and NSP6-AD hybrid proteins, respectively. In most experiments, the NSP6 protein was expressed from yeast vectors containing the gene 11 cDNA fragment between restriction sites DraI and SmaI, described above.
Deletion mutants of NSP5 were constructed to map proteinprotein interaction domains. The NSP5 DNA regions described for mutants C66 and
N130 in Fig. 2
were obtained from plasmid NSP5/pGB by digestion with BclI, which cuts after the nucleotide triplet encoding aa 130 of NSP5, and a second restriction enzyme with sites present either side of the plasmid polylinker. The NSP5 regions contained in all other deletion mutants were amplified by PCR using as template plasmid NSP5/pGB, and all mutants were cloned into pGBT9. The NSP5 mutant CdmS, in which cysteine residues 170 and 173 were substituted by serine residues, was constructed using two oligonucleotides (forward and backward) which introduced the suitable nucleotide changes, and the two PCR products were cloned sequentially into plasmid pGBT9. All constructs used in the two-hybrid system were verified by nucleotide sequencing of the cloning junction region, to ensure that the coding region of either NSP5 or NSP6 was in-frame with the AD or BD of GAL4. Dimerization of vimentin was used as a positive control in two-hybrid assays. Human vimentin cloned in plasmids pGBT9 and pGAD424 was kindly provided by J. F. Hess (University of California, Davis, CA, USA).
|
For expression in MA104 cells using the vaccinia virusT7 transient expression system (Fuerst et al., 1986 ), the cDNAs encoding wild-type (wt) NSP5,
C10 and NSP6 (obtained from plasmid NSP6/pET, containing about 15 extra aa at the N terminus of the protein, but not the His-tail) were cloned in plasmid pcDNA3.1/Hygro- (Invitrogen). The generated plasmids are referred to as NSP5/pcDNA,
C10/pcDNA and NSP6/pcDNA, respectively.
Yeast two-hybrid assay.
This assay was performed as described by González et al. (1998) . When constructions in vectors pAS2-1 and pACT2 were used, the yeast strain Y187 was employed.
-galactosidase activity was detected using X-Gal (Boehringer Mannheim).
In vitro transcription and translation.
The in vitro transcription and translation reactions were done essentially as described by López et al. (1994) . The NSP5 mRNA was transcribed from NSP5/pGM using T7 RNA polymerase. The luciferase mRNA was purchased from Promega.
Affinity assay.
The bacteria transformed with constructions in plasmid pET28a+ were grown to A600=0·6, and induced to express His-tailed proteins with 1 mM IPTG. Lysates were prepared by sonication three times for 20 s in binding buffer (20 mM imidazole, 0·5 M NaCl, 20 mM TrisHCl pH 7·9, 20 µg/ml PMSF) plus 1% Triton X-100, and incubated for 15 min at room temperature. For the affinity assay, 300 µl of lysate, representing 3 ml of culture, was incubated for 20 min, at 25 °C, with 60 µl of 50% Ni2+-NTA agarose (Qiagen) in binding buffer. Next, 5 µl of the in vitro translated, 35S-labelled proteins was added, and the mixture was incubated for 2 h at 4 °C. The agarose beads were then washed once with binding buffer and three times with wash buffer (60 mM imidazole, 0·5 mM NaCl, 20 mM TrisHCl pH 7·9), and the protein complexes bound to the beads were released by boiling in 40 µl of 2x Laemmli sample buffer and analysed by SDSPAGE, Coomassie blue staining and fluorography.
Transient gene expression.
MA104 cells (7080% confluent) on 12-well plates were infected with vaccinia virus vTF7-3 (Fuerst et al., 1986 ), kindly provided by B. Moss (NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, MD) at an m.o.i. of 10 p.f.u. per cell. After 30 min incubation, the inoculum was removed, and a mixture of lipofectamine (Gibco BRL) and 125 ng of each plasmid was added. The cells were further incubated for a period of 6 h, after which the lipofectamineDNA complex was removed. The transfected cells were metabolically labelled at 21 h post-infection for 2·5 h with either 50 µCi/ml of Easy Tag Express-[35S] protein labelling mix (1175 Ci/mmol, NEN) or 100 µCi/ml of 32Pi (85009120 Ci/mmol, NEN). When used, the phosphatase inhibitor okadaic acid (Gibco BRL) was added to cultures at 0·5 µM during the labelling period (Blackhall et al., 1998
). After metabolic labelling, the cells were solubilized in lysis buffer, and the proteins were immunoprecipitated as described in González et al. (1998)
.
Western blot analysis.
Extracts were prepared from yeast cell pellets obtained from 10 ml of liquid cultures with an A660=0·6. The cell pellets were disrupted in 0·1 ml SoE buffer (0·9 M sorbitol, 0·1 M EDTA, pH 8, 20 µg/ml PMSF), supplemented with 4 µl Laemmli sample buffer and 40 µl of acid-washed 0·5 mm glass beads, by vortexing three times for 1 min each. Finally, 96 µl of Laemmli sample buffer was added and the samples were boiled for 3 min, cooled on ice, and centrifuged for 5 min at 4 °C; 10 µl of the resulting supernatants or 20 µl of MA104 infected cell lysates (described above) were loaded on SDSpolyacrylamide gels. After electrophoresis the proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes and probed with hyperimmune serum to NSP5 (González et al., 1998 ) (diluted 1:1000 in PBS5% non-fat milk0·2% Tween 20), or a monoclonal antibody to GAL4-AD (Clontech; diluted 1:7500, as mentioned above). The membranes were then incubated with peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies, and finally developed with the Amersham enhanced chemiluminescence detection system.
Secondary structure prediction.
The secondary structures of the NSP5 and NSP6 proteins were predicted by the Predator method (Frishman & Argos, 1996 ). This method, available from http://pbil.ibcp.fr/cgi-bin/npsa_automat.pl?page=npsa_server.html, is based on recognition of potentially hydrogen-bonded residues in a single amino acid sequence. The amino acid sequences were obtained for the following rotavirus strains: for NSP5 group A rotaviruses, YM (GenBank accession no. X69486), CC86 (X80537), C60 (D00474), Mc323 (U54772), Mc345 (U54773), CN86 (X80538), v183 (X76779), Z10262 (AAB57810), OSU (X15519), SA11 (X07831), RF (J. Cohen, unpublished data), UK (K03385), VMRI (M33606), Alabama (J04361), Wa (V01191), DS-1 (MNXRDS), v252 (X76780), v158 (X76778), v47 (X76781), v51 (X76782), v61 (X76783), RV-5 (P18037), B37 (M28378), v115 (X76777) and 69M (MNXR69); for NSP5 group C rotaviruses, Cowden (X65938), Bristol (AAA47354) and Shintoku (L12391); for NSP6 group A rotaviruses, YM, CC86, CN86, C60, v183, Wa, Z10262, Mc345, SA11, UK, RF, DS-1, RV-5, B37, v252, v51, v115, v158, v47, v61, 69M, VMRI and OSU. The predicted structures that were shared by all the sequences analysed for each protein are shown in Fig. 6
.
|
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
The role in multimerization of the NSP5 conserved cysteine residues located at aa positions 170 and 173 was also evaluated. For this, we changed, by site-directed mutagenesis, the two cysteine residues to serine residues (Fig. 2, mutant CdmS). The double-mutant protein CdmS maintained the ability to interact with wt NSP5, although the interaction was slightly weaker than that achieved with the wt NSP5 multimer (Fig. 2
), indicating that these conserved cysteine residues are not essential for multimerization of the protein.
In vitro determination of the multimerization domain of NSP5
The relevance of the 10 C-terminal aa of NSP5 for the formation of multimers was examined in vitro. Wild-type NSP5, and the deletion mutant C10, were expressed in bacteria with a tail of six histidine residues at their N terminus (NSP5-His). The Ni2+ affinity-purified fusion proteins had an apparent molecular mass of 30 and 28 kDa, respectively (Fig. 3
A, lanes 2 and 3). These proteins were tested for their ability to interact with [35S]methionine-labelled NSP5 and luciferase (as negative control) proteins synthesized in a rabbit reticulocyte lysate. The in vitro produced NSP5 and luciferase polypeptides showed molecular masses of 25 kDa and 61 kDa, respectively (Fig. 3B
, lanes 1 and 5). In this affinity assay, the soluble in vitro translated 35S-labelled proteins were added to the histidine-tagged proteins bound to Ni2+-agarose, and the mixture was incubated for 2 h at 4 °C. After extensive washes, the protein complexes that remained attached to the Ni2+-agarose beads were recovered and analysed by SDSPAGE, Coomassie blue staining and autoradiography. Radioactive NSP5 bound to NSP5-His (Fig. 3B
, line 2), but it did not attach to control Ni2+-agarose beads (Fig. 3B
, lane 4). The specificity of the NSP5 multimerization was also shown by the fact that NSP5-His did not capture 35S-labelled luciferase (Fig. 3B
, lane 6). Despite the fact that comparable amounts of NSP5-His and
C10-His proteins were used in the assay (Fig. 3A
, lanes 2 and 3),
C10-His did not interact with 35S-labelled NSP5 (Fig. 3B
, lane 3), confirming that aa residues 188197 of NSP5 are essential for multimerization.
|
The NSP5 and C10 genes were cloned under the control of the T7 RNA polymerase promoter in the expression vector pcDNA3.1/Hygro-, and these constructions were transfected into MA104 cells previously infected with vaccinia virus vTF7-3 (Fuerst et al., 1986
). The transfected cells were labelled with 32Pi, and lysates of these cells were immunoprecipitated with a hyperimmune serum to NSP5 and analysed by SDSPAGE and autoradiography. In the absence of any other rotavirus protein, NSP5 was present in the multiple isoforms previously described (Fig. 4
, lane 1). An additional faintly phosphorylated polypeptide of 23 kDa was observed, which could represent the initiation of translation at a second in-phase methionine located at aa position 52 (Mattion et al., 1991
). On the other hand, mutant
C10 showed that the species equivalent to the 26 and 28 kDa forms of the wt protein accumulated (labelled in Fig. 4
as 30 and 28 kDa proteins, respectively, since they contain about 15 extra aa at their N termini; see Methods), but the hyperphosphorylated forms were barely distinguished (Fig. 4
, lane 2). A short NSP5 product of about 22 kDa was also observed in
C10, which most probably represents, as described above, a polypeptide result of the initiation of translation at methionine 52. This 22 kDa protein seems to be more efficiently phosphorylated than the corresponding polypeptide derived from the wt gene. Addition of okadaic acid, a phosphatase inhibitor, to the transfected cell cultures increased the amount of hyperphosphorylated species in both NSP5 and
C10, but the hyperphosphorylated isoforms were much more evident in wt NSP5 as compared to the mutant protein (Fig. 4
, lanes 3 and 4). These results suggest that the multimerization of NSP5 is critical for the efficient generation of the hyperphosphorylated species of the protein.
|
The recombinant proteins synthesized in yeast were characterized by Western blotting. A monoclonal antibody to the AD of GAL4 identified a band of 33 kDa in extracts of yeast cells transformed with plasmid NSP6/pACT2, while antibodies to NSP5 detected a protein of 45 kDa cells transformed with plasmid NSP5/pAS2-1 (not shown). These are the expected molecular masses for the NSP6-AD and NSP5-BD hybrid polypeptides. The antibodies to NSP5 did not react with any protein in yeast cells transformed with NSP6/pACT2 (not shown).
To determine the region of NSP5 committed to the association with NSP6, we used the deletion mutants constructed to identify the NSP5 multimerization domain. The pattern of interaction between NSP6 and the various NSP5 mutants in the yeast two-hybrid system was the same as that found for the homomultimerization of NSP5, with the exception of mutant N177 (Fig. 2
). This mutant, which retains only the 20 C-terminal aa residues of the protein, is able to interact with full-length NSP5, but not with NSP6. In addition, the fact that NSP5 mutant
N162 associates with NSP6, while mutant
N162C10 does not, suggests that the NSP5 region involved in the interaction with NSP6 is located within aa 163197.
The heterocomplex NSP5NSP6 also forms in MA104 cells
Immunoprecipitation of rotavirus YM-infected MA104 cells with polyclonal antibodies to either NSP5 or NSP6 resulted in the interaction of each serum with its corresponding protein, but no evidence of co-immunoprecipitation of the NSP5NSP6 complex was found (not shown). To overcome the potential problem of not finding this interaction because of the low level of synthesis of NSP6 (Fig. 1; Mattion et al., 1991
) or due to the competition of NSP2, NSP6 or another rotavirus protein for binding to NSP5, we transiently co-expressed in MA104 cells the two proteins (NSP5 and NSP6) using the vaccinia virusT7 RNA polymerase system (Fuerst et al., 1986
). The synthesized proteins, labelled with [35S]methionine, were analysed by immunoprecipitation with monospecific sera to NSP5 or NSP6. In extracts of cells transfected with either NSP6/pcDNA alone or with plasmids encoding both NSP5 and NSP6, the hyperimmune serum to NSP6 immunoprecipitated a protein of 12 kDa (Figs 5B
, lanes 3 and 4; and 5C
, lane 2). This is the expected molecular mass for NSP6, plus 15 extra aa from the vector fused at its N terminus. The preimmune serum did not precipitate this polypeptide (Fig. 5A
f, lane 2). On the other hand, the hyperimmune serum to NSP5 immunoprecipitated from the double-transfected cells, in addition to NSP5, a band of 12 kDa (Figs 5B
, lane 2; and 5C
, lane 1). The 12 kDa band did not disappear after treatment of the cell lysates with RNase before immunoprecipitation with the serum to NSP5 (not shown), and was not immunoprecipitated from cells transfected only with NSP5/pcDNA (Fig. 5B
, lane 1) or co-transfected with plasmids encoding NSP6 and the NSP5 deletion mutant
C10 (Fig. 5C
, lane 3). In addition, the serum to NSP5 did not recognize NSP6 in the NSP6/pcDNA-transfected cells (Fig. 5 B
, lane 5). Altogether, these results strongly suggest that rotavirus NSP5 and NSP6 proteins associate in eukaryotic MA104 cells, and confirm that the 10 C-terminal aa of NSP5 are necessary for this association.
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In this work we have mapped the homomultimerization domain of NSP5 in vitro and in vivo. To map this domain in vivo, we used the yeast two-hybrid assay, which was shown to specifically detect the NSP5NSP5 interaction (Fig. 2; González et al., 1998
). Contrary to this observation, the bovine rotavirus RF NSP5 has been found to spontaneously transactivate the reporter gene when fused to GAL4-BD (Poncet et al., 1997
). The fact that RF NSP5 has transactivation activity, while YM NSP5 does not, might be the consequence of amino acid differences between these two proteins, which have an identity of 92%.
NSP5 is highly conserved in group A rotavirus strains, and one of the most conserved domains of the protein is the C-terminal region (Mattion et al., 1994 ). This region is also the most conserved between group A and group C NSP5 proteins (Bremont et al., 1993
; Mattion et al., 1994
). For instance, the Bristol group C human strain has an overall identity of 24% with the group A porcine rotavirus strain YM, while the identity between the C-terminal 28 aa of these two proteins is 46%. Furthermore, the prediction of the secondary structure of both group A and C NSP5 polypeptides showed that the 20 C-terminal aa has an
-helical structure (Fig. 6
). The fact that this region includes the homomultimerization domain of group A NSP5 suggests that group C NSP5 may also form multimers, and in turn implies that this property is important for the function of NSP5.
NSP5 has been suggested to have serine/threonine protein kinase activity (Afrikanova et al., 1996 ; Blackhall et al., 1997
; Poncet et al., 1997
). There is, however, no relevant homology between NSP5 and most protein kinases, and the initial description of the amino acid sequence similarity between NSP5 and guanido kinases encompasses a region of the latter that is not conserved among the family (Suzuki & Furukohri, 1994
) and that seems not to have a relevant role in the catalytic, ATP-binding or substrate recognition activities of the protein kinases (Fritz-Wolf et al., 1996
). Despite this, other cellular and viral kinases without the serine/threonine canonical kinase motifs have been reported (Rossi et al., 1996
; Wu et al., 1990
), thus NSP5 could belong to this group of non-conventional kinases.
Our results showed that mutant C10, which was not able to multimerize (Figs 2
and 3
), was very poorly hyperphosphorylated (Fig. 4
), despite the fact that all the serine and threonine residues of the protein, which have been shown to be the target for phosphorylation, are maintained in the mutant protein (Afrikanova et al., 1996
; Blackhall et al., 1997
). In fact, in the C-terminal 28 aa residues of NSP5 there are no serines or threonines, in contrast with the overall 22% content of these amino acids in the full-length protein, which suggests that the multimerization of NSP5 is not directly regulated by phosphorylation. Altogether these data strongly support the idea that NSP5 has a kinase activity responsible for its hyperphosphorylation, which would seem to depend on the multimerization of the protein. Several kinases, like protein tyrosine kinase, Janus kinases, type I and II receptors, c-raf and Tousled, require oligomerization for activation (Heldin, 1995
; Klemm et al., 1998
; Roe et al., 1997
). Also, it has been shown that dimerization of serine/threonine kinases can be achieved by chemical ligands; which is in itself sufficient to regulate their activity (Clemons, 1999
; Farrar et al., 1996
; Luo et al., 1996
).
An alternative explanation for the lack of hyperphosphorylation of mutant C10 is that the 10 C-terminal aa of NSP5 are part of the catalytic core, with the consequential loss of the kinase function when these amino acids are deleted. However, mutant
C10 is still phosphorylated to forms equivalent to the 26 and 28 kDa species of wt NSP5, and all available evidence indicates that these forms are the result of an autocatalytic activity rather than the activity of a cellular enzyme (Afrikanova et al., 1996
, 1998
; Blackhall et al., 1997
, 1998
; Poncet et al., 1997
). Thus, these data suggest that NSP5 has indeed an autocatalytic activity, which, in order to generate the hyperphosphorylated species of the protein, needs to be in the form of a multimer. In this regard, it is of interest that the NSP5 mutants characterized by Fabbretti et al. (1999)
only became hyperphosphorylated when the 10 C-terminal aa of NSP5 were present. Although in that work other mutants having this region were found not to be hyperphosphorylated, the absence of activity of those mutant proteins could be explained by either the impairment of the protein kinase activity (mutants
d131179) or the absence of the substrate region (mutants
N80 and
d3480).
The hyperphosphorylation activity of NSP5 has been proposed to be up-regulated in vivo by the interaction of NSP2 with the N-terminal region of NSP5. Deletion of the 33 N-terminal aa of NSP5 was shown to induce hyperphosphorylation of the protein in vivo, and yielded an NSP5 protein insensitive to NSP2 activation (Afrikanova et al., 1998 ). These observations are in agreement with our idea that multimerization of NSP5 is important for the hyperphosphorylation activity of the protein, since the N-terminal deletion mutants
N130 and
N162 were found to interact with the complete protein (by the yeast two-hybrid assay) more efficiently than with the wt NSP5. From our data it would seem that the hyperphosphorylation of NSP5 is enhanced by, rather than being strictly dependent on, the presence of NSP2.
Since the domains of NSP5 responsible for homomultimerization and for the interaction with NSP6 seem to partially overlap (Fig. 6), it is tempting to suggest that NSP6 could have a regulatory role in the multimerization of NSP5 and hence in the hyperphosphorylation activity of the protein. Additionally, it has been shown that the interaction between NSP2 and NSP5 is reinforced when NSP2 is bound to RNA (Poncet et al., 1997
), thus making an NSP2NSP5RNA complex susceptible to regulation by NSP6. It is not known, however, whether NSP5 simultaneously forms multimers and binds NSP6 (and NSP2), or if NSP6 associates with NSP5 and disrupts the multimers. The formation of alternative protein complexes could be modulated by the phosphorylation level of NSP5.
The regulatory role of NSP6 is supported by its low synthesis in rotavirus-infected cells. On the other hand, an ORF encoding NSP6 has not been found in the NSP5 gene of rotavirus group A strains Mc323 and Alabama or in rotavirus group C strains. Thus, the proposed regulatory role of NSP6, or any other function it might have, would seem to be a fine tuning that can be somehow substituted. With regard to the NSP5NSP6 interaction, it is of interest to note that gene 11 of rotavirus OSU encodes a short, 50 aa long NSP6, which is identical to the corresponding 50 N-terminal aa of the YM protein. OSU NSP6 is able to localize to viroplasms (Mattion et al., 1991 ); thus, if the interaction of NSP6 with NSP5 directs the viroplasmic localization of NSP6, the domain of this protein responsible for the interaction with NSP5 should map to its N-terminal half.
As already recognized, the phosphorylation of NSP5 seems to be a complex process which might involve both viral and cellular kinases (Afrikanova et al., 1996 , 1998
; Blackhall et al., 1997
, 1998
; Poncet et al., 1997
). The addition of one or a few phosphates, to produce the 26 kDa NSP5 isoform, has been proposed to occur by an intramolecular low-rate autocatalytic event, although the specific attack of a cellular kinase has not been completely ruled out. This primary phosphorylation of NSP5 could make it more able to be phosphorylated on multiple serine/threonine residues to produce the 28 kDa species, as has been shown for other protein kinases (Johnson, 1993
; Newton, 1997
). Based on the lack of hyperphosphorylation (generation of the 3034 kDa isoforms) of mutant
C10, in this study it is proposed that NSP5 multimerization is essential for this activity of the protein, which is consistent with the suggestion that dimerization brings two polypeptides together, promotes favourable orientations, and makes the intermolecular phosphorylation more efficient (Heldin, 1995
; Klemm et al., 1998
). Apparently, at the end of the modification process of the protein, cellular kinases could still add more phosphates to NSP5 (Blackhall et al., 1998
). These cellular kinases could phosphorylate NSP5 only if NSP5 is in the form of a multimer. These processes might be regulated in infected cells by NSP6 and NSP2, as described above.
The function of NSP5 is not known, but it has been implicated in the formation of viroplasm-like structures, and in rotavirus genome RNA packaging, assortment and replication. Additional experiments are needed to define the role of this protein, and that of NSP6, in the replication cycle of rotaviruses.
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
![]() |
Footnotes |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Afrikanova, I., Fabbretti, E., Miozzo, M. C. & Burrone, O. R. (1998). Rotavirus NSP5 phosphorylation is up-regulated by interaction with NSP2.Journal of General Virology 79, 2679-2686.[Abstract]
Aponte, C., Poncet, D. & Cohen, J. (1996). Recovery and characterization of a replicase complex in rotavirus-infected cells by using a monoclonal antibody against NSP2.Journal of Virology 70, 985-991.[Abstract]
Blackhall, J., Fuentes, A., Hansen, K. & Magnusson, G. (1997). Serine protein kinase activity associated with rotavirus phosphoprotein NSP5.Journal of Virology 71, 138-144.[Abstract]
Blackhall, J., Munoz, M., Fuentes, A. & Magnusson, G. (1998). Analysis of rotavirus nonstructural protein NSP5 phosphorylation.Journal of Virology 72, 6398-6405.
Bremont, M., Chabanne-Vautherot, D. & Cohen, J. (1993). Sequence analysis of three non structural proteins of a porcine group C (Cowden strain) rotavirus.Archives of Virology 130, 85-92.[Medline]
Clemons, P. A. (1999). Design and discovery of protein dimerizers.Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 3, 112-115.[Medline]
Estes, M. K. & Cohen, J. (1989). Rotavirus gene structure and function.Microbiology Review 53, 410-449.
Fabbretti, E., Afrikanova, I., Vascotto, F. & Burrone, O. E. (1999). Two non-structural rotavirus proteins, NSP2 and NSP5, form viroplasm-like structures in vivo.Journal of General Virology 80, 333-339.[Abstract]
Farrar, M. A., Alberola-IIa, J. & Perlmutter, R. M. (1996). Activation of the raf-1 kinase cascade by coumermycin-induced dimerization.Nature 383, 178-181.[Medline]
Frishman, D. & Argos, P. (1996). Incorporation of non-local interactions in protein secondary structure prediction from the amino acid sequence.Protein Engineering 9, 133-142.[Abstract]
Fritz-Wolf, K., Schnyder, T., Wallimann, T. & Wolfgang, K. (1996). Structure of mitochondrial creatine kinase.Nature 381, 341-345.[Medline]
Fuerst, T. R., Niles, E. G., Studier, F. W. & Moss, B. (1986). Eukaryotic transient expression system based on recombinant vaccinia virus that synthesizes bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 83, 8122-8126.[Abstract]
Gallegos, C. O. & Patton, J. T. (1989). Characterization of rotavirus replication intermediates: a model for the assembly of single-shelled particles.Virology 172, 616-627.[Medline]
González, S. A. & Burrone, O. R. (1991). Rotavirus NS26 is modified by addition of single O-linked residues of N-acetylglucosamine.Virology 182, 8-16.[Medline]
González, R. A., Torres-Vega, M. A., López, S. & Arias, C. F. (1998). In vivo interactions among rotavirus nonstructural proteins.Archives of Virology 143, 981-996.[Medline]
Heldin, C.-H. (1995). Dimerization of cell surface receptors in signal transduction.Cell 80, 213-223.[Medline]
Johnson, L. N. (1993). The effects of phosphorylation on the structure and function of proteins.Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure 22, 199-232.[Medline]
Kapikian, A. Z. & Chanock, R. M. (1996). Rotaviruses. In Fields Virology, pp. 1657-1708. Edited by B. N. Fields, D. N. Knipe & P. M. Howley. New York: Raven Press.
Kattoura, M. D., Chen, X. & Patton, J. T. (1994). The rotavirus RNA-binding protein NS35 (NSP2) forms 10S multimers and interacts with the viral RNA polymerase.Virology 202, 803-813.[Medline]
Klemm, J. D., Schreiber, S. L. & Crabtree, G. R. (1998). Dimerization as a regulatory mechanism in signal transduction.Annual Review of Immunology 16, 569-592.[Medline]
Legrain, P., Dokhelar, M.-C. & Transy, C. (1994). Detection of proteinprotein interactions using different vectors in the two-hybrid system.Nucleic Acids Research 22, 3241-3242.[Medline]
López, S. & Arias, C. F. (1993). Protein NS26 is highly conserved among porcine rotavirus strains.Nucleic Acids Research 21, 1042.[Medline]
López, S., Espinosa, R., Greenberg, H. B. & Arias, C. F. (1994). Mapping the subgroup epitopes of rotavirus protein VP6.Virology 204, 153-162.[Medline]
Luo, Z., Tzivion, G., Belshaw, P. J., Vavvas, D., Marshall, M. & Avruch, J. (1996). Oligomerization activates c-Raf-1 through a Ras dependent mechanism.Nature 383, 181-185.[Medline]
Mattion, N. M., Mitchell, D. B., Both, G. W. & Estes, M. K. (1991). Expression of rotavirus proteins encoded by alternative open reading frames of genome segment 11.Virology 181, 295-304.[Medline]
Mattion, N. M., Cohen, J. & Estes, M. K. (1994). The rotavirus proteins. In Viral Infections of the Gastrointestinal Tract, pp. 169-249. Edited by A. Kapikina. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Newton, A. (1997). Regulation of protein kinase C.Current Opinion in Cell Biology 9, 161-167.[Medline]
Patton, J. T. (1995). Structure and function of the rotavirus RNA-binding proteins.Journal of General Virology 76, 2633-2644.[Medline]
Poncet, D., Lindenbaum, P., Lharidon, R. & Cohen, J. (1997). In vivo and in vitro phosphorylation of rotavirus NSP5 correlates with its localization in viroplasms.Journal of Virology 71, 34-41.[Abstract]
Prasad, B. V. & Chiu, W. (1994). Structure of rotavirus.Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology 185, 9-29.[Medline]
Roe, J. L., Durfee, T., Zupan, J. R., Repetti, P. P., McLean, G. B. & Zambryski, P. C. (1997). TOUSLED is a nuclear serine/threonine protein kinase that requires a coiled-coil region for oligomerization and catalytic activity.Journal of Biological Chemistry 272, 5838-5845.
Rossi, F., Labourier, E., Forné, T., Divita, G., Derancourt, J., Riou, J. F., Antoine, E., Cathala, G., Brunel, C. & Tazi, J. (1996). Specific phosphorylation of SR proteins by mammalian DNA topoisomerase I.Nature 381, 80-82.[Medline]
Suzuki, T. & Furukohri, T. (1994). Evolution of phosphagen kinase. Primary structure of glycocyamine kinase and arginine kinase from invertebrates.Journal of Molecular Biology 237, 353-357.[Medline]
Welch, S. K., Crawford, S. E. & Estes, M. K. (1989). Rotavirus SA11 genome segment 11 protein is a nonstructural phosphoprotein.Journal of Virology 63, 3974-3982.[Medline]
Wu, J. Y., Zhou, Z. Y., Judd, A., Cartwright, C. A. & Robinson, W. S. (1990). The hepatitis B virus-encoded transcriptional transactivator hbx appears to be a novel protein serine/threonine kinase.Cell 63, 687-695.[Medline]
Received 4 August 1999;
accepted 10 November 1999.