Infectivity of recombinant strawberry vein banding virus DNA

Ali Mahmoudpour

Department of Plant Pathology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA

Correspondence
Ali Mahmoudpour
ali5491338{at}yahoo.com


   ABSTRACT
Top
ABSTRACT
MAIN TEXT
REFERENCES
 
Infectivity of the cloned DNA genome of strawberry vein banding virus (SVBV) was demonstrated by particle bombardment of 4-week-old strawberry (Fragaria vesca L. var. UC-5) plants with gold particles coated with the putative full-length 7·9 kb viral DNA. Vein banding symptoms developed on 15 % of inoculated plants 6–7 weeks post-inoculation. An approximate 1·25-mer of the viral DNA was cloned into the binary vector pCGN1547. Particle bombardment of this construct into strawberry plants gave an infection rate of 75 %. The construct was used for transformation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and infiltration of these cells into healthy strawberry leaves resulted in development of vein banding symptoms in 100 % of inoculated plants. Gel electrophoresis, Southern blot hybridization with an SVBV probe and sequence analyses of PCR-amplified DNA fragments were used to confirm SVBV infection in symptomatic plants.

Present address: Department of Plant Protection, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 51664, Iran.


   MAIN TEXT
Top
ABSTRACT
MAIN TEXT
REFERENCES
 
Strawberry vein banding virus (SVBV) has a double-stranded DNA genome (Stenger et al., 1988; Petrzik et al., 1998) of approximately 8 kbp encapsidated in icosahedral particles of approximately 45 nm diameter (Kitajima et al., 1973; Morris et al., 1980). SVBV is transmitted in a semi-persistent manner by several aphid species and infects only strawberry (Frazier, 1955). SVBV is classified as a member of Caulimoviridae (Kitajima et al., 1973; Morris et al., 1980; Petrzik et al., 1998). However, due to difficulties in virus purification and mechanical inoculation of strawberry plants, the capacity of this virus alone to induce the vein banding disease has not been unequivocally demonstrated. Purified particles of SVBV have never been shown to be infectious. Stenger et al. (1988) constructed a a genomic clone (in pSVBV-E3) but did not demonstrate that it was infectious.

Biological and molecular studies of SVBV and other strawberry-infecting viruses are hindered by the properties of the host plant. Furthermore, no alternative host for SVBV has been identified to facilitate biological studies. Thus, procedures for obtaining purified virus in quantities needed for molecular characterization of the virus genome and virion proteins, and for producing specific antibodies, are still limited by the difficulties associated with strawberry tissues. The objectives of the present study were: (a) to establish an efficient inoculation method; (b) to demonstrate the infectivity of the SVBV genomic clones.

The SVBV isolate used in this study was maintained in ‘UC-5’ strawberry (Fragaria vesca L.), a commonly used indicator host for strawberry viruses. Infected plants were propagated by rooting runners. The genomic clone of SVBV (pSVBV-E3; Stenger et al., 1988) and a strawberry plant infected with SVBV (same isolate from which the clone was obtained) were kindly provided by T. J. Morris (Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA).

Virion DNA isolation, PCR and partial sequencing were done as reported previously (Mahmoudpour, 2000) to verify that the pSVBV-E3 clone was full-length. Mechanical inoculation and particle bombardment were used to inoculate indicator plants (UC-4 and UC-5 strawberries, Chenpodium spp. and Nicotiana spp.) with different inocula. Partially purified virions (prepared according to Stenger et al., 1988 and/or Hull et al., 1976), viral genomic DNA and/or cloned SVBV DNA released from pSVBV-E3 were used as inocula. To prevent browning of plant extracts {beta}-mercaptoethanol ({beta}-ME) was added to a final concentration of 1·0 % (v/v). A helium particle gun (Biolistic Particle Delivery System, model PDS-1000, Dupont) was used to bombard 4-week-old UC-5 strawberry plants with gold particles coated with DNA according to Paplomatas et al. (1994). Partially purified virus DNA, cloned SVBV DNA released from pSVBV-E3, and the SVBV 1·25-mer in pCGN1547 were used as DNA sources and delivered at a pressure of 1550 p.s.i. Gold particles alone were used as negative control.

Inoculation experiments, except where noted, were repeated at least three times. Inoculated plants were maintained in a glasshouse and were observed periodically for symptom expression. All inoculated plants were also assayed for SVBV infection by PCR (Mahmoudpour, 2000).

pCGN1547 (McBride & Summerfelt, 1990), was used to construct a multimeric copy of SVBV DNA. This vector, in the presence of a 200 kb disarmed Ti-plasmid in Agrobacterium tumefaciens LBA4404 (Invitrogen), is commonly used for gene transformation of plants and also has been used for agroinoculation of geminiviruses (Hou et al., 1998).

To engineer the 1·25x construct, a 2·0 kb PstI–BamHI SVBV fragment (nucleotides 5899 to 33 of SVBV) was excised from pSVBV-E3 and inserted into the multiple cloning site (MCS) of pCGN1547 digested with PstI and BamHI, to give a pCGN1547/2·0-kb SVBV recombinant. The full-length SVBV DNA insert was released from pSVBV-E3 by EcoRI digestion, and then re-ligated to obtain circular or linear multimeric SVBV DNA. The re-ligated DNA was digested with PstI to generate a 7·9 kb PstI fragment, which was ligated into pCGN1547/2·0-kb SVBV digested with PstI giving rise to pCGN1547SVBV1·25 recombinant. Through restriction analysis, recombinant plasmids having a 7·9 kb BamHI fragment were considered to have the 1·25-mer in the correct orientation, the infectivity of which was demonstrated by bombarding 12 UC-5 plants (one replicate only).

Electro-competent A. tumefaciens LBA4404 cells (Invitrogen) were transformed with pCGN1547SVBV1·25 construct by electroporation according to the manufacturer's instructions. Transformants were selected on 2x YT agar plates (Sambrook et al., 1989) supplemented with 10 µg gentamicin ml-1. Colonies were screened for the presence of the 24 kb plasmid or 7·9 kb PstI fragment by gel electrophoresis. PCR was used to identify the transformants using primers specific for the SVBV coat protein gene.

The A. tumefaciens strain carrying pCGN1547SVBV1·25 was propagated in liquid culture at 28 °C using 2x YT medium supplemented with 100 µg streptomycin ml-1 and 10 µg gentamicin ml-1. Non-transformed LBA4404 cells (negative control) were grown under the same conditions except without gentamicin. Cells were recovered by spinning at 5000 g and suspended in 0·1 vols 100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 6·5–7·0. Bacterial suspensions were infiltrated into the intercellular spaces of 4-week-old strawberry leaves using a 5·0 ml syringe without any needle. Multiple sites were inoculated per leaf and three to five leaves were inoculated per plant. Inoculated plants were maintained in a glasshouse.

Viral DNA was prepared according Mahmoudpour (2000) and analysed in 1 % agarose gels in Tris/acetate/EDTA (TAE) buffer followed by ethidium bromide staining. The electrophoresed DNA was transferred to nylon membranes and analysed by Southern blot hybridization. Colorimetric or chemoluminescent detection methods were used to detect DNA on membranes. The digoxigenin-11-dUTP-labelled pSVBV-E3 probe was prepared by random priming using Klenow fragment according to Miltenburg et al. (1995). Viral DNA obtained from infected plants was examined with or without restriction enzyme digestion (BamHI and BamHI/EcoRI) along with total genomic DNA from uninfected UC-5 strawberry plants as a control. PSVBV-E3 digested with EcoRI was used as a marker and a positive control in all gels and Southern blot hybridization analyses.

To confirm the integrity of the cloning site of the putative full-length clone in pSVBV-E3 (i.e. to be certain that a small EcoRI fragment was not released during cloning) a 1500 bp fragment of virion DNA, including the cloning site, was PCR-amplified and sequenced on both strands. Only a single EcoRI site was identified in this 1500 bp fragment and the sequence across the cloning site was identical with the sequence of the two ends of the insert DNA. These results are consistent with pSVBV-E3 having a full-length SVBV clone.

Repeated attempts to infect strawberry plants by mechanical inoculation with cloned SVBV DNA were unsuccessful, irrespective of using the linear or self-ligated monomer (i.e. circularized DNA). Table 1 summarizes the inoculation data obtained for the three replicates of biolistic inoculation and agroinoculation on UC-5 strawberries. Symptoms developed in 16 % of plants inoculated with monomer-coated particles approximately 6 weeks post-inoculation. Control plants inoculated with gold particles alone or those bombarded with the gold particles coated with DNA from partially purified virus did not develop symptoms (Fig. 1). The plants bombarded with gold particles coated with pCGN1547SVBV1·25 developed symptoms even at a higher infection rate of 75 %. Systemic infection with SVBV in symptomatic plants was verified by PCR analysis of the young terminal leaves.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Results with two different procedures for inoculation of strawberry (F. vesca L., var. UC-5) plants with cloned SVBV DNA

For particle bombardment, gold particles were coated with the 7·9 kb SVBV monomer excised from pSVBV-E3 with EcoRI. pCGN1547SVBV1·25 supercoiled DNA was similarly inoculated to confirm its infectivity. For agroinoculation, Agrobacterium tumefaciens LBA4404 cells transformed with pCGN1547SVBV1·25 were infiltrated into leaves. Virus infection was verified by symptom expression and PCR analysis. Negative control plants were bombarded with gold particles alone (biolistic experiments), or infiltrated with non-transformed LBA4404 cells. NA, Not assessed.

 


View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Symptoms of SVBV in leaves of indicator UC-5 strawberry. (A) Plant vegetatively propagated from a known SVBV-infected plant. (B) Plant inoculated by particle bombardment with the monomeric insert DNA of pSVBV-E3. (C) Uninfected healthy control.

 
Agroinoculation of both UC-4 and UC-5 strawberry plants with A. tumefaciens carrying the infectious pCGN1547SVBV1·25 construct resulted in 100 % infection (Table 1). Vein banding symptoms similar to those of Fig. 1 developed in agroinoculated plants 3–4 weeks post-inoculation, compared with 6–7 weeks for particle bombardment.

As shown in Fig. 1 symptoms on SVBV-infected plants (vegetatively propagated California isolate) and on the plants infected after bombardment with cloned SVBV DNA, were indistinguishable (i.e. mild vein-banding symptoms and chlorosis along the veins). Infected plants were also stunted and their leaves were not expanded as fully as on non-infected plants. Vein banding symptoms in all infected plants eventually became attenuated, but reappeared on new growth after removal of older leaves.

Plant total genomic DNA seen in ethidium bromide-stained gels (Fig. 2A) did not hybridize with the probe in Southern blot hybridization analyses (Fig. 2B). A 7·9 kb viral DNA band shown in lane 1 was detected only in linearized form. A linear 7·9 kb fragment shown in lane 2 was generated by digesting the circular form of viral genomic DNA with BamHI. The bands running at 3·9 kb are presumed to be the product of BamHI digestion (the BamHI site is 33 bases from the alpha nick) and a physical breakage at the single-stranded beta-nick position.



View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. (A) Agarose gel electrophoresis analysis of SVBV DNA. Ethidium bromide-stained gel with viral DNA isolated from SVBV-infected strawberries (infected by agroinoculation with A. tumefaciens LBA4404 cells transformed with pCGN1547SVBV1·25). Lane 1, untreated virus DNA; lane 2, virus DNA digested with BamHI; lane 3, the same DNA digested with BamHI and EcoRI. Bands in the marker lane (M) were produced by separately digesting pSVBV-E3 DNA with BamHI, HindIII and EcoRI, and combining the resulting fragments. A total genomic DNA extract obtained from uninfected strawberry is shown in lane H (healthy control). (B) Southern blot hybridization analysis of the gel in (A). DNA bound to the membrane was visualized by colorimetric detection (Boehringer Mannheim). SVBV DNA obtained from pSVBV-E3 (marker lane) and SVBV-infected strawberries (lanes 1–3) hybridized with dig-11-dUTP-labelled DNA probe derived from pSVBV-E3. A pair of 3·9 kb bands (lane 2) was generated by BamHI digestion of the linear form of the DNA already broken at the beta nick. Double-digestion of viral and cloned DNA with (lane 3 and marker lane) produced 3·6 and 4·2 kb bands.

 
The primary goal of this study was to investigate whether the cloned SVBV DNA in pSVBV-E3 was infectious. According to Stenger et al. (1988), the lack of infectivity of the SVBV clone might indicate that the genome was not intact. The presence of an additional EcoRI site adjacent to the cloning site of SVBV DNA in pSVBV-E3 could have resulted in the loss of a small DNA fragment during cloning, thereby rendering the clone noninfectious. In this study, a PCR-amplified SVBV DNA fragment, containing the EcoRI cloning site, was sequenced and shown not to have an additional EcoRI site near the cloning site. Therefore, the clone in pSVBV-E3 was most likely a full-length clone.

Sap transmission of SVBV has been unsuccessful (Frazier, 1955; Morris et al., 1980; Stenger et al., 1988), and previous attempts failed to demonstrate the infectivity of pSVBV-E3 (Stenger et al., 1988). Demonstrating the infectivity of pSVBV-E3 was necessary to fulfil Koch's postulates and prove that SVBV causes the disease symptoms from which it has derived its name.

When linear monomers of the SVBV (released from pSVBV-E3) were bombarded into leaves of strawberry plants, vein banding symptoms developed 6–7 weeks post-inoculation, where infection was confirmed by PCR and Southern blot hybridization analyses. These results establish that SVBV is the causal agent of strawberry vein banding disease and that the disease is not caused by mixed infection with another virus.

Transmission of viruses by agroinoculation has been demonstrated previously for caulimoviruses (Gal et al., 1992), geminiviruses (Hou et al., 1998) and potexviruses (Lamprecht & Jelkmann, 1997). All three viruses are transmissible either mechanically or by a vector. This method gave an infection rate of 100 % in strawberry plants with SVBV (Mahmoudpour, 2000). The high rate of SVBV transmission by agroinoculation established that this method could be applied to viruses which have no means of manual inoculation.

Agarose gel and Southern blot hybridization (Fig. 2) of SVBV DNA isolated from partially purified virion preparations from vegetatively propagated UC-5 strawberries or from particle gun or agroinoculated strawberries confirmed SVBV infection in plants showing the vein banding symptoms.

Digesting the DNA with two restriction enzymes with unique sites in SVBV DNA (BamHI and EcoRI) along with pSVBV-E3 (Stenger et al., 1988) as the control and hybridizing the bands with a pSVBV-E3-derived DNA probe provided further evidence for identity of the viral DNA from these preparations. As seen in Fig. 2(A), these DNA fragments co-migrated in the gel and similar restriction sites were present in both DNAs. The single-stranded nicks of SVBV DNA found in this study verified the work of Stenger et al. (1988).


   ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
This study was accomplished during 1996–2000 at the Department of Plant Pathology and Foundation Plant Materials Service (FPMS), University of California, Davis. I express my gratitude to Dr Adib Rowhani, Dr Robert Gilbertson, Dr Bruce Kirkpatrick and Dr Stephen Daubert, the members of my thesis committee. The author also appreciates the critical reviews made by Dr Nemat Bashir and Dr Keramat Izadpanah.


   REFERENCES
Top
ABSTRACT
MAIN TEXT
REFERENCES
 
Frazier, N. W. (1955). Strawberry vein banding virus. Phytopathology 45, 307–312.

Gal, S., Pisan, B., Hohn, T., Grimsley, N. & Hohn, B. (1992). Agroinfection of transgenic plants leads to viable cauliflower mosaic virus by intermolecular recombination. Virology 187, 525–533.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hou, Y.-M., Paplomatas, E. J. & Gilbertson, R. L. (1998). Host adaptation and replication properties of two bipartite geminiviruses and their pseudorecombinants. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 11, 208–217.

Hull, R., Shepherd, R. J. & Harvey, J. D. (1976). Cauliflower mosaic virus: an improved purification procedure and some properties of the virus particles. J Gen Virol 31, 93–100.

Kitajima, E. W., Betti, J. A. & Costa, A. S. (1973). Strawberry vein-banding virus, a member of the cauliflower mosaic virus group. J Gen Virol 20, 117–119.

Lamprecht, S. & Jelkmann, W. (1997). Infectious cDNA clone used to identify strawberry mild yellow edge-associated potexvirus as causal agent of the disease. J Gen Virol 78, 2347–2353.[Abstract]

Mahmoudpour, M. M. A. (2000). Strawberry vein banding caulimovirus: biology and characterization. PhD dissertation. University of California, Davis, CA, USA.

McBride, K. E. & Summerfelt, K. R. (1990). Improved binary vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Plant Mol Biol 14, 269–276.[Medline]

Miltenburg, R. V., Rüger, B., Grünewald-Janho, S., Leons, M. & Schröder, C. (1995). The Dig System User's Guide for Filter Hybridization. Indianapolis: Boehringer Mannheim.

Morris, T. J., Mullin, R. H., Sclegel, D. E., Cole, A. & Alosi, M. C. (1980). Isolation of a caulimovirus from strawberry tissue infected with strawberry vein banding virus. Phytopathology 70, 156–160.

Paplomatas, E. J., Patel, V. P., Hou, Y.-M., Noueiry, A. O. & Gilbertson, R. L. (1994). Molecular characterization of a new sap-transmissible bipartite genome geminivirus infecting tomatoes in Mexico. Phytopathology 84, 1215–1224.

Petrzik, K., Benes, V., Mráz, I., Honetslegrová-Fránová, J., Ansorge, W. & Spak, J. (1998). Strawberry vein banding virus – definitive member of the genus caulimovirus. Virus Genes 16, 303–305.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. & Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual. 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.

Stenger, D. C., Mullin, R. H. & Morris, T. J. (1988). Isolation, molecular cloning, and detection of strawberry vein banding virus DNA. Phytopathology 78, 154–159.

Received 20 November 2002; accepted 25 January 2003.



This Article
Abstract
Full Text (PDF)
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Articles by Mahmoudpour, A.
Articles citing this Article
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Mahmoudpour, A.
Agricola
Articles by Mahmoudpour, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS