Epstein–Barr virus latent membrane protein 2A has no growth-altering effects when expressed in differentiating epithelia

Luz Longan1 and Richard Longnecker1

Department of Microbiology-Immunology, Northwestern University Medical School, 303 E. Chicago Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611, USA1

Author for correspondence: Richard Longnecker. Fax +1 312 503 1339. e-mail r-longnecker{at}northwestern.edu


   Abstract
Top
Abstract
Main text
References
 
Previous studies using transgenic mice with B-cell expression of LMP2A demonstrated that LMP2A drives B-cell development and survival signal in the absence of normal B-cell receptor (BCR) signal transduction. To determine if LMP2A may have similar effects in epithelial differentiation, six transgenic murine lines were constructed and analysed with LMP2A expression directed to the epidermis by a keratin 14 (K14) promoter cassette. LMP2A protein expression was verified by immunofluorescence and immunoprecipitation of skin samples using LMP2A-specific antibodies. To evaluate the effects of LMP2A expression on epidermal differentiation, immunofluorescence and histochemistry were performed on tongue and tail samples of transgenic mice and their wild-type littermate controls using differentially expressed keratins. The analysis indicated that LMP2A does not alter the normal epithelial differentiation program in the epithelia of K14–LMP2A transgenic mice.


   Main text
Top
Abstract
Main text
References
 
Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is one of two human herpes viruses that play an aetiological role in human malignancies (Chang et al., 1994 ; Rickinson & Kieff, 1996 ). EBV is the causative agent of infectious mononucleosis and is also associated with Burkitt’s lymphoma, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, AIDS-associated immunoblastic lymphoma, oral hairy leukoplakia and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) (for review, Rickinson & Kieff, 1996 ). NPC is an epithelial tumour that occurs worldwide but is characterized by geographical and population differences in incidence (for review, Cruchley et al., 1997 ; Raab-Traub, 1992 ; Rickinson & Kieff, 1996 ). NPC is rare among Europeans and Caucasians but occurs with high incidence in Southern Chinese and South-East Asian populations (for review, Cruchley et al., 1997 ; Raab-Traub, 1992 ; Rickinson & Kieff, 1996 ). While genetic and environmental factors are associated with NPC, EBV appears to be the strongest and most consistently related factor (for review, Cruchley et al., 1997 ; Raab-Traub, 1992 ; Rickinson & Kieff, 1996 ). In NPC, transcripts for the EBV-encoded genes LMP1, LMP2A, EBNA1, EBERs and BARTs are typically expressed (for review, Cruchley et al., 1997 ; Raab-Traub, 1992 ; Rickinson & Kieff, 1996 ).

Previous studies using in vitro models of EBV latent infections in B lymphocytes established that LMP2A blocks normal B-cell receptor (BCR) signal transduction by the association with Src family protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs) and the Syk PTK (Burkhardt et al., 1992 ; Fruehling & Longnecker, 1997 ; Fruehling et al., 1998 ; Miller et al., 1994 , 1995 ). In vivo studies using transgenic mice that express LMP2A in B lymphocytes have indicated that LMP2A not only blocks BCR signal transduction but also provides a BCR-like signal that allows for B-cell development and survival in the absence of normal BCR signals (Caldwell et al., 1998 , 2000 ). Very little is known in regard to the effects of LMP2A on epithelial biology. A recent study indicates that LMP2A is phosphorylated upon adhesion of epithelial cells expressing LMP2A to extracellular matrixes, which suggests that LMP2A may be important in altering normal epithelial signal transduction (Scholle et al., 1999 ). Signal transduction in epithelial cells uses a similar repertoire of signal-transducing proteins as is used in normal BCR signal transduction. Thus, to determine if LMP2A may also provide an inappropriate developmental or survival signal in epithelial cells which would result in the alteration of normal epithelial biology, transgenic mice with LMP2A expression directed to the basal layer of the epidermis were constructed using a keratin 14 (K14) promoter construct. A total of six murine K14–LMP2A transgenic lines were analysed, all which had no alteration in normal epithelial differentiation despite abundant LMP2A expression in the basal layer of the epidermis.

In order to drive expression of LMP2A to differentiating epithelia, a previously described K14 cassette was obtained from E. Fuchs (University of Chicago, USA). The K14 construct containing the K14 promoter, K14 polyA tail and betaglobin splice site is shown in Fig. 1(A). This expression construct was previously used to construct multiple transgenic lines which resulted in the expression of the transgene in the basal layer of the epidermis (Guo et al., 1993 ; Turksen et al., 1992 ; Vassar et al., 1992 ). A previously described chimeric LMP2A gene consisting of both cDNA and genomic sequences (Caldwell et al., 1998 , 2000 ) was placed downstream of the K14 promoter in the expression plasmid. The transgene was excised from the parental vector and used for injections into mouse embryos. Twenty-six mice were produced. At 3 weeks of age, DNA was prepared from mice tail snips, digested with BamHI, subjected to gel electrophoresis in 0·8% agarose, and transferred to Gene Screen Plus (NEN Life Science) as previously described (Caldwell et al., 2000 ). Southern blot analysis of genomic tail DNA using an LMP2A-specific probe identified eight founder mice (Fig. 1B). Seven of the eight lines contained the unit length 5100 bp band resulting from head to tail concatemers of the transgene (Fig. 1B, lines 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 107 and 108). Line 106 lacked this band and was not analysed further. The additional bands in each line which hybridize to the LMP2A-specific probe probably represent fusion bands of the LMP2A transgene with murine DNA sequences or rearranged LMP2A transgenes. The transgenic mice were bred into a CD1 wild-type background purchased from Jackson Laboratories. Transgenic line 108 did not breed and therefore was not analysed. Lines 101–105 and 107 were analysed as described below.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Generation and analysis of K14–LMP2A transgenic mice. (A) Schematic representation of construct used for generation of K14–LMP2A mice. To generate the K14–LMP2A transgene construct the EcoRI fragment of pRL192 (Caldwell et al., 1998 , 2000 ) was cloned into the BamHI site of the pG3Z-K14 plasmid. The pG3Z-K14 expression plasmid consists of the keratin 14 (K14) promoter, a betaglobin intron, and the K14 polyA tail. A chimeric LMP2A gene was used consisting of both genomic and cDNA sequences. The K14–LMP2A sequences were excised from the parental vector and used for injections into fertilized mouse embryos. (B) Identification of K14–LMP2A transgenic mice. Genomic DNA purified from mouse tail snips was digested and Southern blot hybridization was performed using an LMP2A-specific probe as previously described. Eight founder mice (101–108) were identified and their unique hybridization patterns are shown. The 5100 bp unit length is indicated by an arrow. Additional bands hybridizing to the LMP2A-specific probe represent bands generated by integration of the transgene into the murine genome or possible rearrangement of the K14–LMP2A transgene sequences. Size standards in kilobase pairs are indicated on the left. (C) Expression of LMP2A in the skin of transgenic LMP2A mice. A 1 cm2 skin sample was isolated from K14–LMP2A 102 transgenic mice (TG lanes) and littermate controls (WT lanes). The samples were homogenized in 1% Triton X-100 lysis buffer and immunoprecipitated for LMP2A using the previously described rat monoclonal antibody 14B7. Immune complexes were isolated with protein G–Sepharose, separated on 8% SDS–PAGE gels and immunoblotted for LMP2A as previously described. The LMP2A-specific band is indicated by an arrow. Protein samples from an EBV+ LMP2A+ transformed lymphoblastoid cell line (LCL) and from an EBV+ LMP2A- lymphoblastoid cell line (ESI) were used as controls.

 
To verify expression of LMP2A in epithelial tissue, a 1 cm2 piece of dorsal back skin was isolated from euthanized transgenic mice (lines 101, 102 and 107) and littermate controls. The samples were placed in 2 ml 1% Triton X-100 lysis buffer (Fruehling et al., 1996 ). The skin sample was then homogenized using a Polytron PT 2100 (Kinematica). Homogenates were incubated at room temperature for 25 min and then centrifuged to pellet insoluble debris. LMP2A was then immunoprecipitated using the LMP2A rat monoclonal antibody 14B7 (Fruehling et al., 1996 ) for 1 h at 4 °C. Immune complexes were then isolated with protein G–Sepharose. The beads were washed four times in 1% Triton X-100 lysis buffer. An equal volume of 2x SDS loading buffer was then added to each sample followed by incubation at 70 °C for 10 min. The samples were then subjected to 8% SDS–PAGE as previously described (Fruehling et al., 1996 ). The separated proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose, blocked with 4% milk for 1 h at room temperature, immunoblotted with biotinylated 14B7 in Tris-buffered saline–Tween, incubated with horseradish peroxidase-linked neutravidin, and detected by enhanced chemiluminescence. Fig. 1(C) shows a Western blot of immunoprecipitations from a litter resulting from the breeding of K14–LMP2A mice from line 102 with CD1 wild-type mice. The two transgenic mice resulting from this mating show a clear LMP2A band, while the two wild-type littermate controls resulting from the same mating do not (Fig. 1C). An EBV+LMP2A+ lymphoblastoid cell line (LCL) and an EBV+LMP2A- LCL were used as positive and negative controls respectively. A background band is evident in both the wild-type control and transgenic mice. Lines 101 and 107 were tested in a similar fashion and also demonstrated LMP2A expression in the epithelial samples (data not shown).

To determine if the expression of LMP2A altered the normal morphology and/or differentiation of the epithelium, tail and tongue sections were analysed from 6-week-old K14–LMP2A transgenic mice and littermate controls. Fig. 2(A) shows a schematic representation (left) of the four stages of epithelial development and the expression of the differentiation markers associated with each stage lined up with a representative photomicrograph (right) of an H&E-stained tail section from a wild-type mouse control for reference purposes. H&E-stained paraffin-embedded sections were prepared by placing mouse tail or tongue samples in buffered Formalde-Fresh (Fisher), embedding in paraffin, and staining 5–6 µm sections with H&E. As observed in Fig. 2(B) (tail sections) or Fig. 2(C) (tongue sections), there was no apparent change in thickness or epithelial differentiation in the LMP2A transgenic lines 101, 102 and 107 when compared to littermate controls. This result was also observed in the 103, 104 and 105 K14–LMP2A transgenic lines (data not shown).





View larger version (170K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Normal differentiation program and LMP2A expression in the epidermis of K14–LMP2A transgenic mice. (A) Schematic representation of epithelial differentiation (left) compared to a representative photomicrograph of an H&E-stained mouse tail skin section taken from a wild-type control mouse (right). The epidermis can be divided into four layers. Each layer is characterized by the position, morphology and biochemical markers of the cells within (for review, Fuchs & Byrne, 1994 ). Cells in the innermost layer (basal) are replicating and express keratin 5 (K5) and K14. As cells leave this layer and commit to differentiation they move upward into the stratum spinosum. In this layer cells flatten, down regulate the expression of K5 and K14, and express K1 and K10. Cells continue upward into the stratum granulosum where they start to lose their nuclei, begin to express filagrin and are eventually sloughed off the surface (stratum corneum). (B, C) Immunolocalization of K14 and LMP2A expression in K14–LMP2A transgenic lines in tail samples (B) or tongue samples (C) using indirect immunofluoresence. H&E staining on a 5 µm paraffin-embedded section showing the different layers and morphology in detail. Frozen mouse tail sections (5 µm) from transgenic and wild-type littermate controls were analysed for the presence of K14 by indirect immunofluoresence. K14 expression was the same in both the transgenic and the wild-type, being localized to the basal level of developing epidermis. LMP2A expression was similar to K14, being confined to the basal layer of the epidermis, consistent with the K14 promoter construct used to construct the transgenic mice.

 
To further investigate epithelial differentiation and confirm LMP2A expression in the basal layer of the epithelium, immunofluoresence was performed using specific antibodies on mouse tongue and tail samples that were quick-frozen in liquid nitrogen using OCT (Sakura Finetek). Following freezing, 6 µm sections were cut, placed on super-frost plus slides (Fisher) and immediately fixed in acetone at -20 °C for 10 min. The sections were then air-dried and stored at -20 °C until used. Sections were treated for 10 min with 20% goat serum, incubated with primary monoclonal antibodies against K14 (CKB1, obtained from Sigma) and LMP2A (14B7). Slides were then washed in PBS, followed by incubation with the appropriate species-specific secondary antibodies directly conjugated with a chromophore. The slides were then washed five times in PBS prior to viewing by fluorescence microscopy. K14 expression was limited to the basal layer of epidermis in both K14–LMP2A transgenic mice as well as littermate controls in both tongue and tail samples (Figs 2B and 3C). LMP2A expression was also readily observed with its expression limited to the basal layer in both tail and tongue samples as expected, exhibiting K14-like regulated expression (Fig. 2B, C). No staining for LMP2A was observed in wild-type littermate controls (Fig. 2B, C). All K14–LMP2A transgenic lines were examined and no differences were observed. Only lines 101, 102 and 107 are shown in Fig. 2.



View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. K10 and filagrin expression in the epidermis of K14–LMP2A transgenic mice. K10 expression was detected in the spinosum and granulosum layers, while filagrin expression was limited to the corneum and granulosum layers. There was no difference in the expression pattern of these two markers of epidermal differentiation when the K14–LMP2A transgenic lines were compared to the wild-type littermate controls.

 
To further investigate any LMP2A-specific effects on epithelial differentiation, expression of K10, K6 and filagrin in epithelial samples from the K14–LMP2A transgenic mice was investigated. Antibodies were obtained from Sigma. K10 and filagrin are markers of the differentiated suprabasal layers (Fig. 2A). Like K14, reduced or disordered expression of K10 can occur in oral squamous cell carcinomas (for review, Morgan & Su, 1994 ). K6 is normally expressed in the skin only in hair follicles and in the proliferating epidermis of wounds, but is aberrantly expressed in the suprabasal layers in hyperplastic, neoplastic or psoriatic skin (Knapp et al., 1987 ; Moll et al., 1982 ; Morgan & Su, 1994 ; Stoler et al., 1988 ; Weiss et al., 1984 ). Immunofluoresence was performed in the same way as for Fig. 2. Expression of K10 and filagrin was normal in the K14–LMP2A transgenic mice when compared to littermate controls (Fig. 3). K10 expression, in both the transgenic and littermate controls, was limited to the spinosum and granulosum layers, while filagrin expression was readily observed in the granulosum and corneum layers as expected (for review, Fuchs & Byrne, 1994 ). Consistent with a complete absence of any LMP2A-induced changes in epithelial differentiation, there was no expression of K6 detected in the LMP2A transgenic lines and littermate controls (data not shown). Results with the K14–LMP2A transgenic lines 101 and 107 were indistinguishable (data not shown) from the results shown for the K14–LMP2A 102 transgenic line (Fig. 3).

LMP1, EBNA1, BARTs, EBERs and LMP2A are the EBV latency-associated genes most consistently detected in NPC tumour biopsies (for review, Raab-Traub, 1992 ; Cruchley et al., 1997 ; Rickinson & Kieff, 1996 ). Work previously done on LMP1 has shown it to have transforming effects in rodent fibroblasts, growth-altering effects in B lymphocytes, and it is absolutely required for transformation of primary B lymphocytes with EBV (for review, Kieff, 1996 ; Longnecker, 1998 ). In transgenic mice, LMP1 induces epithelial hyperplasia and aberrant expression of keratin when expressed in the epithelium and induces lymphoproliferation when expressed in lymphocytes (Kulwichit et al., 1998 ; Wilson et al., 1990 ). There is little information in regard to the effects of EBNA1 on normal epithelial biology. Transgenic murine studies have indicated that EBNA1 may predispose lymphocytes to malignant transformation (Wilson et al., 1996 ). Despite these observations, EBNA1 does not dramatically alter B-lymphocyte phenotype in vitro. The exact role of the BARTs and EBERs in EBV-mediated transformation is yet to be determined. Results with LMP2A transgenic mice with lymphocyte-directed expression indicated a putative role for LMP2A in EBV latency and transformation that was not previously appreciated. In these studies, LMP2A was shown to alter normal B-cell development and provide a survival signal to B lymphocytes (Caldwell et al., 1998 , 2000 ). In this study, we investigated the effect of LMP2A expression on normal epithelial differentiation also utilizing a transgenic approach.

Work in vitro has shown that LMP2A specifically binds to and regulates the activity of the Src family PTKs and the Syk PTK. The Syk PTK accumulates in most haematopoietic cell types, including B cells, mast cells, platelets and immature T cells (for review, Weiss & Littman, 1994 ). Zap-70, a related PTK, is expressed only in T cells (for review, Weiss & Littman, 1994 ). There is no indication that either of these PTKs are expressed in epithelial-derived cell lines. In contrast, at least four Src family PTKs (Thomas & Brugge, 1997 ), two of which have been shown to bind LMP2A, are expressed in epithelial cells (Burkhardt et al., 1992 ). Src has been shown to be activated following integrin engagement following attachment of epithelial cells to a fibronectin matrix (Kaplan et al., 1995 ). Other signal transduction cascades present in epithelial cells in which Src family kinases are important include signalling induced by the cadherins and receptor protein tyrosine kinases. In addition to the role of Src family PTKs in epithelial signal transduction, there are additional signalling proteins, many of which are shared with B-lymphocyte signal transduction, which may be affected by the expression of LMP2A. Despite the central role of Src family PTKs in normal epithelial signal transduction and the ability of LMP2A to alter normal Src family PTK function in B lymphocytes, there was no observable effect of LMP2A expression on epithelial cells in the K14–LMP2A transgenic mice.

Given the dramatic effects that LMP2A can have on B-lymphocyte differentiation and survival, it is surprising that LMP2A appears to have little effect on epithelial differentiation despite the importance of Src family PTK signalling in epithelial cells. LMP2A is phosphorylated by Csk upon adhesion to extracellular matrixes in cell lines grown in tissue culture. Since LMP2A is consistently detected in most NPC samples, it is likely that LMP2A will have a role in the development of EBV-associated epithelial malignancies. LMP2A may not be the primary initiating event, but may act in concert with other viral proteins such as EBNA1 and LMP1, which are also typically expressed in NPC biopsies. Alternatively, the alteration of a specific cell protein may be required for LMP2A-specific effects in epithelial cells. Future studies utilizing the LMP2A transgenic mice constructed in this study will entail the mating of the LMP2A transgenic lines with transgenic lines expressing other EBV proteins expressed in NPC to determine if they may act in concert. In addition, studies to determine if LMP2A may have more subtle effects on epithelial cells, which may be evident by analysing wound healing and chemical carcinogenesis in the LMP2A transgenic mice, will be pursued. These studies may shed light on the role of LMP2A in EBV-associated epithelial cancers.


   Acknowledgments
 
R.L. is supported by Public Health Service grants CA62234 and CA73507 from the National Cancer Institute and DE13127 from the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research. R.L. is a Scholar of the Leukaemia and Lymphoma Society of America. We are grateful for the contributions of members of the Longnecker, Green and Spear Laboratories at Northwestern University and Elaine Fuchs from the University of Chicago for the contribution of the K14 expression plasmid. All protocols involving mice were approved by the Northwestern University Animal Care and Use Committee.


   References
Top
Abstract
Main text
References
 
Burkhardt, A. L., Bolen, J. B., Kieff, E. & Longnecker, R. (1992). An Epstein–Barr virus transformation-associated membrane protein interacts with src family tyrosine kinases.Journal of Virology 66, 5161-5167.[Abstract]

Caldwell, R. G., Wilson, J. B., Anderson, S. J. & Longnecker, R. (1998). Epstein–Barr virus LMP2A drives B cell development and survival in the absence of normal B cell receptor signals. Immunity 9, 405-411.[Medline]

Caldwell, R. G., Brown, R. C. & Longnecker, R. (2000). Epstein–Barr virus LMP2A-induced B-cell survival in two unique classes of EuLMP2A transgenic mice. Journal of Virology 74, 1101-1113.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chang, Y., Cesarman, E., Pessin, M. S., Lee, F., Culpepper, J., Knowles, D. M. & Moore, P. S. (1994). Identification of herpesvirus-like DNA sequences in AIDS-associated Kaposi’s sarcoma. Science 266, 1865-1869.[Medline]

Cruchley, A. T., Williams, D. M., Niedobitek, G. & Young, L. S. (1997). Epstein–Barr virus: biology and disease. Oral Diseases 3 (Suppl. 1), S156–S163.[Medline]

Fruehling, S. & Longnecker, R. (1997). The immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif of Epstein–Barr virus LMP2A is essential for blocking BCR-mediated signal transduction. Virology 235, 241-251.[Medline]

Fruehling, S., Lee, S. K., Herrold, R., Frech, B., Laux, G., Kremmer, E., Grasser, F. A. & Longnecker, R. (1996). Identification of latent membrane protein 2A (LMP2A) domains essential for the LMP2A dominant-negative effect on B-lymphocyte surface immunoglobulin signal transduction. Journal of Virology 70, 6216-6226.[Abstract]

Fruehling, S., Swart, R., Dolwick, K. M., Kremmer, E. & Longnecker, R. (1998). Tyrosine 112 of latent membrane protein 2A is essential for protein tyrosine kinase loading and regulation of Epstein–Barr virus latency. Journal of Virology 72, 7796-7806.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fuchs, E. & Byrne, C. (1994). The epidermis: rising to the surface. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 4, 725-736.[Medline]

Guo, L., Yu, Q. C. & Fuchs, E. (1993). Targeting expression of keratinocyte growth factor to keratinocytes elicits striking changes in epithelial differentiation in transgenic mice. EMBO Journal 12, 973-986.[Abstract]

Kaplan, K. B., Swedlow, J. R., Morgan, D. O. & Varmus, H. E. (1995). c-Src enhances the spreading of src-/- fibroblasts on fibronectin by a kinase-independent mechanism. Genes & Development 9, 1505-1517.[Abstract]

Kieff, E. (1996). Epstein–Barr virus and its replication. In Fields Virology, pp. 2343-2396. Edited by B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe & P. M. Howley. Philadelphia: Lippincott–Raven.

Knapp, B., Rentrop, M., Schweizer, J. & Winter, H. (1987). Three cDNA sequences of mouse type I keratins. Cellular localization of the mRNAs in normal and hyperproliferative tissues. Journal of Biological Chemistry 262, 938-945.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kulwichit, W., Edwards, R. H., Davenport, E. M., Baskar, J. F., Godfrey, V. & Raab-Traub, N. (1998). Expression of the Epstein–Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 induces B cell lymphoma in transgenic mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 95, 11963-11968.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Longnecker, R. (1998). Molecular biology of Epstein–Barr virus. In Human Tumor Viruses, pp. 133-172. Edited by D. McCance. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.

Miller, C. L., Lee, J. H., Kieff, E. & Longnecker, R. (1994). An integral membrane protein (LMP2) blocks reactivation of Epstein–Barr virus from latency following surface immunoglobulin crosslinking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 91, 772-776.[Abstract]

Miller, C. L., Burkhardt, A. L., Lee, J. H., Stealey, B., Longnecker, R., Bolen, J. B. & Kieff, E. (1995). Integral membrane protein 2 of Epstein–Barr virus regulates reactivation from latency through dominant negative effects on protein tyrosine kinases. Immunity 2, 155-166.[Medline]

Moll, R., Franke, W. W., Schiller, D. L., Geiger, B. & Krepler, R. (1982). The catalog of human cytokeratins: patterns of expression in normal epithelia, tumors and cultured cells. Cell 31, 11-24.[Medline]

Morgan, P. R. & Su, L. (1994). Intermediate filaments in oral neoplasia. I. Oral cancer and epithelial dysplasia. European Journal of Cancer, Part B, Oral Oncology 30, 160-166.

Raab-Traub, N. (1992). Epstein–Barr virus and nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Seminars in Cancer Biology 3, 297-307.[Medline]

Rickinson, A. B. & Kieff, E. (1996). Epstein–Barr virus. In Fields Virology, pp. 2397-2446. Edited by B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe & P. M. Howley. Philadelphia: Lippincott–Raven.

Scholle, F., Longnecker, R. & Raab-Traub, N. (1999). Epithelial cell adhesion to extracellular matrix proteins induces tyrosine phosphorylation of the Epstein–Barr virus latent membrane protein 2: a role for C-terminal Src kinase. Journal of Virology 73, 4767-4775.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stoler, A., Kopan, R., Duvic, M. & Fuchs, E. (1988). Use of monospecific antisera and cRNA probes to localize the major changes in keratin expression during normal and abnormal epidermal differentiation. Journal of Cell Biology 107, 427-446.[Abstract]

Thomas, S. M. & Brugge, J. S. (1997). Cellular functions regulated by Src family kinases. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 13, 513-609.[Medline]

Turksen, K., Kupper, T., Degenstein, L., Williams, I. & Fuchs, E. (1992). Interleukin 6: insights to its function in skin by overexpression in transgenic mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 89, 5068-5072.[Free Full Text]

Vassar, R., Hutton, M. E. & Fuchs, E. (1992). Transgenic overexpression of transforming growth factor alpha bypasses the need for c-Ha-ras mutations in mouse skin tumorigenesis. Molecular and Cellular Biology 12, 4643-4653.[Abstract]

Weiss, A. & Littman, D. R. (1994). Signal transduction by lymphocyte antigen receptors. Cell 76, 263-274.[Medline]

Weiss, R. A., Eichner, R. & Sun, T. T. (1984). Monoclonal antibody analysis of keratin expression in epidermal diseases: a 48- and 56-kdalton keratin as molecular markers for hyperproliferative keratinocytes. Journal of Cell Biology 98, 1397-1406.[Abstract]

Wilson, J. B., Weinberg, W., Johnson, R., Yuspa, S. & Levine, A. J. (1990). Expression of the BNLF-1 oncogene of Epstein–Barr virus in the skin of transgenic mice induces hyperplasia and aberrant expression of keratin 6. Cell 61, 1315-1327.[Medline]

Wilson, J. B., Bell, J. L. & Levine, A. J. (1996). Expression of Epstein–Barr virus nuclear antigen-1 induces B cell neoplasia in transgenic mice. EMBO Journal 15, 3117-3126.[Abstract]

Received 19 April 2000; accepted 26 May 2000.