A. N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Moscow State University, Moscow 119899, Russia
Correspondence
Sergey Yu. Morozov
morozov{at}genebee.msu.su
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Published ahead of print on 18 March 2003 as DOI 10.1099/vir.0.18922-0
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
A number of positive-stranded RNA viruses have been found to lack gene products with similarity to the TMV MP (Mushegian & Koonin, 1993). Comparisons of genomic sequences in some such viruses revealed a strikingly similar element of three partially overlapping ORFs called the triple gene block (TGB) (Bouzoubaa et al., 1986
; Morozov et al., 1987
, 1989
; Forster et al., 1988
; Huisman et al., 1988
; Skryabin et al., 1988
; Rupasov et al., 1989
). TGB-encoded proteins are referred to as TGBp1, TGBp2 and TGBp3, according to the positions of their genes (Solovyev et al., 1996
). Further accumulation of plant virus genome sequence data revealed TGBs in the genera Potexvirus, Carlavirus, Allexivirus, Foveavirus, Hordeivirus, Benyvirus, Pomovirus and Pecluvirus (Fig. 1
). While arrangement of the TGB cistrons relative to each other is well conserved, TGB positions in the genomes of viruses of different genera can vary considerably (Fig. 1
) (Morozov et al., 1989
; Morozov & Solovyev, 1999
). Mutational analyses of infectious cDNA clones of virus genomes demonstrate that all three TGB proteins are essential for the virus movement process (Petty & Jackson, 1990
; Petty et al., 1990
; Beck et al., 1991
; Gilmer et al., 1992
; Herzog et al., 1998
). Thus, movement functions carried on the single TMV MP are likely to be distributed over three proteins in TGB-containing viruses, a feature that makes such viruses an attractive model to investigate the movement process.
|
TGBp1 contains a NTPase/helicase sequence domain that is closely related to the replicative helicases of alpha-like viruses and belongs to helicases of superfamily I (SF-I) (Fig. 2) (Gorbalenya et al., 1989
; Gorbalenya & Koonin, 1993
; Koonin & Dolja, 1993
). Of seven typical motifs in this domain, motif I, with a characteristic GKS/T tripeptide, and motif II are responsible for binding ATP and Mg2+ and correspond to the Walker A and Walker B sites found in numerous ATP-binding proteins (Figs 2 and 3
) (Gorbalenya & Koonin, 1993
; Kadare & Haenni, 1997
). Phylogenetic analysis of the NTPase/helicase sequences allows clustering of TGBp1 into two major groups, corresponding to filamentous viruses (genera Potexvirus, Carlavirus, Foveavirus and Allexivirus) and rod-shaped viruses (genera Hordeivirus, Benyvirus, Pomovirus and Pecluvirus). Furthermore, the molecular masses of TGBp1 in filamentous viruses range from 24 to 26 kDa and the NTPase/helicase domain comprises the entire sequence, whereas TGBp1s of rod-shaped viruses are substantially larger from 39 to 63 kDa and contain additional long N-terminal domains (Figs 1 and 2
) (Solovyev et al., 1996
; Wong et al., 1998
; Erhardt et al., 1999b
). Peculiar features of these extensions are (i) the presence of arginine/lysine-rich clusters, possibly involved in binding of nucleic acids, and (ii) a region of sequence similarity just upstream of the helicase domain (Figs 2 and 3
) (Bleykasten et al., 1996
; Solovyev et al., 1996
).
|
|
|
Based upon rules for topology of integral membrane proteins (Sipos & Von Heijne, 1993; Gafvelin et al., 1997
), hordeivirus TGBp2 and TGBp3 molecules are proposed to be integrated into the lipid bilayer in a U-like conformation with their N terminus exposed to the cytoplasm and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) lumen/extracellular space, respectively (Solovyev et al., 1996
). Another protein topology can be predicted for the potexvirus TGBp3s (Fig. 4b
).
Thus, primary structure comparisons of the three TGB proteins allow us to distinguish two classes of TGBs: hordei-like (class 1) and potex-like (class 2) (Figs 1, 2 and 4) (Solovyev et al., 1996
; Erhardt et al., 1999b
). The biological relevance of this classification is confirmed by the different role played by viral coat protein (CP) in cell-to-cell movement of the viruses with different types of TGB (Callaway et al., 2001
). The CP is dispensable for cell-to-cell movement mediated by hordei-like TGBs (Petty & Jackson, 1990
; Schmitt et al., 1992
; Herzog et al., 1998
; McGeachy & Barker, 2000
). In contrast, the CP of potexviruses and, presumably, of other viruses with potex-like TGBs, is necessary for intercellular transport of the viral genome (Chapman et al., 1992
; Forster et al., 1992
; Sit & Abouhaidar, 1993
) (see below).
Expression of TGB proteins in virus-infected plants
TGB proteins are expressed simultaneously at the early stages of infection (Niesbach-Klösgen et al., 1990; Donald at al., 1993
), as are MPs of other viruses, such as TMV (Lehto et al., 1990
). Similarly to other Sindbis-like viruses, expression of 5'-distal genes in TGB-containing viruses occurs via subgenomic RNAs (sgRNAs) that are 3' co-terminal with genomic RNAs (Buck, 1996
; Agranovsky & Morozov, 1999
). For TGBp1 and TGBp2, sgRNAs of the appropriate sizes have been found in infected plants, whereas TGBp3-specific sgRNA is not commonly detected (Guilford & Forster, 1986
; Dolja et al., 1987
; Gilmer et al., 1992
; Zhou & Jackson, 1996
). Detailed studies of TGB expression demonstrated that two sgRNAs are sufficient for translation of the three TGB proteins: the longer sgRNA serves as the template for translation of TGBp1, while the shorter sgRNA is the messenger for both TGBp2 and TGBp3 (Morozov et al., 1991b
; Zhou & Jackson, 1996
; Verchot et al., 1998
; Agranovsky & Morozov, 1999
). Expression of TGBp3 by leaky ribosome scanning through the TGBp2 gene was proposed (Skryabin et al., 1988
; Morozov et al., 1989
). This translation strategy maintains a low level of TGBp3 expression. For example, in vitro translation of a sgRNA transcript yields TGBp2 and TGBp3 in the ratio 10 : 1 (Zhou & Jackson, 1996
). Furthermore, the expression level of TGBp3 in infected plants may be even lower, as suggested by the inability to detect TGBp3, while TGBp2 is detected easily (Niesbach-Klösgen et al., 1990
; Donald at al., 1993
; Gorshkova et al., 2003
).
Functions of TGBp1
Biochemical activities of TGBp1 in vitro
Cell-to-cell movement of plant viruses was postulated to involve specific non-virion transport RNPs (Atabekov & Dorokhov, 1984; Citovsky & Zambryski, 1993
), and further experiments have demonstrated that all tested MPs of the 30K superfamily are nucleic acid-binding proteins (Carrington et al., 1996
; Ghoshroy et al., 1997
; Tzfira et al., 2000
). The TGBp1 proteins, similarly to 30K superfamily MPs, can bind ssRNA non-specifically in a co-operative manner and have affinity for ssDNA as well (Rouleau et al., 1994
; Bleykasten et al., 1996
; Kalinina et al., 2001
; Donald et al., 1997
). For the potex-like TGBp1s, stability of in vitro co-operative binding to RNA is lower than for the 30K superfamily MPs (Rouleau et al., 1994
; Kalinina et al., 1996
, 1998
; Lough et al., 1998
; Wung et al., 1999
). The RNA-binding site of potexviral TGBp1 has been mapped to the N-terminal protein region containing positively charged residues essential for interaction with RNA. One of these residues is an arginine, conserved in all potex-like TGBp1, 1719 aa upstream of the GKS/T tripeptide (Fig. 3
) (Morozov et al., 1999
; Wung et al., 1999
).
Multiple RNA-binding sites are found in hordeiviral TGBp1 (Donald et al., 1995, 1997
). The isolated C-terminal helicase domain of a hordeiviral TGBp1 shows co-operative RNA binding similar to that of potex-like TGBp1, while the N-terminal extension domain demonstrates strong non-co-operative RNA binding, so that the whole protein exhibits both types of binding (Kalinina et al., 2001
). Similarly, other hordei-like TGBp1s are capable of strong, salt-resistant RNA binding (Bleykasten et al., 1996
; Donald et al., 1997
; Cowan et al., 2002
). In hordeiviral TGBp1s, the two short arginine/lysine-rich regions are essential for N-terminal extension domain-specific RNA binding (Solovyev et al., 1996
; Kalinina et al., 2001
). Likewise, RNA binding of a benyvirus TGBp1 is specified by an arginine/lysine-rich region positioned 618 residues from the N terminus (Fig. 2
) (Bleykasten et al., 1996
).
Both potex- and hordei-like TGBp1s have RNA helicase activity in vitro (Kalinina et al., 2002). Importantly, the hordeiviral TGBp1 helicase unwinds the duplex in both the 5'
3' and the 3'
5' directions, with respect to the chain used for entry, and is unable to unwind DNA duplexes (Kalinina et al., 2002
). In contrast, superfamily I (SF-I) DNA helicases and RNA virus SF-II helicases operate in the 3'
5' direction only (Gorbalenya & Koonin, 1993
; Kadare & Haenni, 1997
). Generally, the duplex unwinding activity of helicases depends on the hydrolysis of NTPs, preferentially ATP (Gorbalenya et al., 1989
; Gorbalenya & Koonin, 1993
; Kadare & Haenni, 1997
; Soultanas & Wigley, 2001
; Caruthers & McKay, 2002
). Accordingly, the RNA helicase activity of TGBp1 requires ATP and Mg2+ (Kalinina et al., 2002
), and NTP-binding and Mg2+-dependent NTPase activities have been detected for TGBp1 in vitro (Rouleau et al., 1994
; Bleykasten et al., 1996
; Kalinina et al., 1996
; Donald et al., 1997
; Morozov et al., 1999
; Solovyev et al., 1999
; Liou et al., 2000
). Finally, many helicases can form homodimers or oligomers (Gorbalenya & Koonin, 1993
) and both hordei- and potex-like TGBp1 are capable of self-interactions (Cowan et al., 2002
; our unpublished data).
Four structural domains have been identified in SF-I DNA helicases. The N-terminal domain 1A includes helicase motifs IIII, while the C-terminal domain 2A carries motifs IVVI. The sequences of domains 1A and 2A are interrupted by the inserted domains 1B and 2B (Fig. 5) (Soultanas & Wigley, 2001
; Caruthers & McKay, 2002
). Alignment with the sequence of PcrA, a bacterial SF-I DNA helicase with known three-dimensional structure, demonstrates that TGBp1 shows (i) conservation of the helicase motifs in domains 1A and 2A and (ii) the absence of domains 1B and 2B, which are precisely deleted from the TGBp1 sequences (Fig. 5
) (Kalinina et al., 2002
). Importantly, deletion of the 2B domain introduced in a bacterial SF-I DNA helicase (Rep protein) had no effect on helicase activity in vitro and in vivo (Cheng et al., 2002
). Hence, TGBp1 represents a naturally simplified version of a SF-I helicase with just two structural domains. Interestingly, a similar structure has been described for the cellular eIF-4A helicase, the prototype member of the DEAD SF-II family of RNA helicases, which shares with TGBp1 two other features exceptional among RNA helicases, namely the ability to discriminate between RNA and DNA and to operate in both directions (Gorbalenya & Koonin, 1993
; Kadare & Haenni, 1997
; Caruthers & McKay, 2002
; Du et al., 2002
; Kalinina et al., 2002
).
|
|
No ability to modify PD and move cell to cell has been reported for individually expressed hordei-like TGBp1, suggesting that this protein is incapable of intracellular trafficking to PD by itself and depends on TGBp2 and TGBp3 for this function (discussed below). Conversely, potexviral TGBp1 is capable of interacting with PD and increasing PD SEL (Angell et al., 1996; Lough et al., 1998
, 2000
; Malcuit et al., 1999
; Morozov et al., 1999
; Yang et al., 2000
). Mutations influencing the potexviral TGBp1 helicase motif I (disabling both helicase and NTPase activities of the protein) block the protein's ability to increase PD SEL, whereas mutations of motif VI (disabling the helicase but not NTPase activity) (Kalinina et al., 2002
) affect neither the increase in TGBp1-induced SEL nor TGBp1 transport to the cell periphery (Lough et al., 1998
; Morozov et al., 1999
). Thus, ATP binding and/or hydrolysis rather than helicase activity per se are involved in PD dilation by potex-like TGBp1.
Potexviral TGBp1 is co-translocated with the CP and virus genomic RNA during virus movement through PD (Morozov et al., 1997; Lough et al., 1998
, 2000
, 2001
). It is natural to propose that TGBp1 helicases couple RNA unwinding and translocation through PD microchannels. The discovery of a specialized RNA-translocating NTPase (P4 protein) that participates in RNA transfer and packaging into bacteriophage
6 virions (Juuti et al., 1998
) further supports such a proposal.
TGBp1 of Potato virus X (PVX) has been reported to interact with one end of the virion and to induce energy-dependent conformational changes of virus particles in vitro (Atabekov et al., 2000). Soultanas & Wigley (2001)
have suggested that energy generated by ATP hydrolysis can be used by helicases not only for separation of base-paired regions but also for displacement of other proteins from nucleic acids. Thus, by analogy with some SF-II cell and viral helicases (RNPases) involved in disassembly and remodelling of RNP complexes (Tseng et al., 1998
; Jankowsky et al., 2001
; Schwer, 2001
), TGBp1 could potentiate cell-to-cell transport of virions or movement-related RNPs through PD by disrupting both RNAprotein interactions and intramolecular RNA base-pairing. In this case, in addition to trafficking of viral genomes through PD, hordei-like TGBp1 may mediate a displacement of cell proteins prior to genomic RNA transport to PD. During viral genome replication, nascent RNA molecules are most likely packaged into RNPs by host cytosolic proteins which rapidly coat newly synthesized cellular and virus-specific mRNAs and facilitate their efficient translation and further turnover (Mitchell & Tollervey, 2001
; Pilipenko et al., 2001
; Fedoroff, 2002
). Re-packaging of such RNPs by replacement of cell proteins with hordei-like TGBp1 may result in formation of movement-competent non-translatable RNPs (Karpova et al., 1999
).
TGBp1 as a factor of whole plant infection
CPs are dispensable for systemic infection of hordeiviruses and pomoviruses, which are thus believed to enter the phloem and traffick along the sieve tubes as a non-virion RNP containing genomic RNA and TGBp1 (Brakke et al., 1988; Petty & Jackson, 1990
; Donald et al., 1997
; McGeachy & Barker, 2000
; Lawrence & Jackson, 2001b
). In hordeiviral TGBp1, two positively charged motifs responsible for RNA-binding activity of the N-terminal extension domain (Fig. 2
) have been found to be dispensable for virus transport from cell to cell but, nevertheless, necessary for long-distance virus movement. Therefore, the RNA-binding activities of the helicase and extension domains of hordei-like TGBp1 could be specialized in either cell-to-cell or long-distance transport, respectively (Kalinina et al., 2001
). However, the presence of the N-terminal extension in TGBp1 and its compatibility with the helicase domain are required to support both cell-to-cell and long-distance movement in hordeiviruses (Donald et al., 1995
, 1997
; Solovyev et al., 1999
).
In contrast to hordeiviruses, a functional CP is required for potexvirus long-distance movement (Santa Cruz et al., 1998). Potexviral TGBp1 is co-transported along the phloem sieve tube together with virions (or a non-virion CP-containing RNP). Because the sieve element contains no translational apparatus, this complex with TGBp1 must include all functional activities required for exiting from the sieve tube to the companion cells (Santa Cruz et al., 1998
; Lough et al., 2001
).
The ability of the virus to establish systemic infection in plants depends largely on the efficacy of plant defence response against infection versus the potential of the virus to escape or counter this defence (Carrington et al., 2001; Dangl & Jones, 2001
; Vance & Vaucheret, 2001
). One of the defence mechanisms in plants is gene silencing, which is mediated by sequence-specific degradation of viral RNAs in the cytoplasm (Baulcombe, 2002
; Voinnet, 2001
; Waterhouse et al., 2001
). However, TGB-containing viruses, like many plant viruses, have evolved special mechanisms to suppress RNA silencing (Voinnet et al., 2000
; Dunoyer et al., 2002a
; Yelina et al., 2002
). In particular, potexviral TGBp1 has been shown to suppress production or activity of the mobile silencing signal (Voinnet et al., 2000
). Importantly, some of the sequences of TGBp1 involved in suppressing the silencing activity do not affect cell-to-cell movement (D. Baulcombe, The Sainsbury Laboratory, John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK, personal communication).
Another virus resistance mechanism is mediated by a large family of R gene-encoded proteins that recognize pathogen-encoded elicitors and trigger defence pathways, such as programmed cell death or hypersensitive response (Dangl & Jones, 2001; Holt et al., 2003
). PVX TGBp1 has been shown recently to be such an elicitor recognized by the Nb gene-mediated resistance system in potatos. The TGBp1 region required for activation of the Nb response is located in the N terminus upstream of the helicase motif I (Malcuit et al., 1999
).
Functions of TGBp2 and TGBp3
Subcellular distribution of TGBp2 and TGBp3 and virus movement
In agreement with sequence analysis (Fig. 4) and in vitro studies predicting that TGBp2 and TGBp3 are integral membrane proteins (Morozov et al., 1987
, 1990
, 1991a
), cell fractionation of plant tissues expressing these proteins demonstrates predominant association of both proteins with the P1 and P30 membranous fractions as well as with the cell wall (CW) fraction (Niesbach-Klösgen et al., 1990
; Donald et al., 1993
; Hefferon et al., 1997
; Cowan et al., 2002
; Gorshkova et al., 2003
).
Further studies of subcellular localization of TGBp2 and TGBp3 employed their GFP fusions expressed in plant cells by a variety of techniques. Note that experiments on transient expression of MPs should be interpreted cautiously, since MPs expressed from vectors are likely produced in much larger quantities and in a non-regulated fashion compared to a virus infection. Also, methods of delivery of expression vectors such as high-pressure biolistic bombardment may perturb cell status (Crawford & Zambryski, 2001) and functional properties of proteins may be hindered by the fused fluorescent protein sequences (Thomas & Maule, 2000
; Brandizzi et al., 2002a
). Nevertheless, transient expression of GFP fusions is widely used to study MPs in live cells and the results of such studies do not usually contradict data obtained by other methods (Lazarowitz, 1999
; Lazarowitz & Beachy, 1999
; Brandizzi et al., 2002a
; Heinlein, 2002a
).
When transiently expressed in individual epidermal cells of Nicotiana benthamiana, GFP-tagged TGBp2s of Poa semilatent virus (PSLV) and Potato mop-top virus (PMTV) are localized to elements of the cell endomembrane system, mainly tubules of the cortical ER network (Solovyev et al., 2000; Cowan et al., 2002
; Zamyatnin et al., 2003
). In cells with higher levels of PSLV TGBp2 expression, a part of the protein is also associated with motile vesicles (Solovyev et al., 2000
) that resemble plant Golgi stacks (Brandizzi et al., 2002b
). The Golgi-like mobile vesicles have been found to contain most of the transiently expressed TGBp2 of PVX (our unpublished data). Subcellular localization of TGBp2 to the ER and Golgi is determined by the hydrophobic protein segments and, in particular, the length of the C-terminal hydrophobic segment (Solovyev et al., 2000
; Zamyatnin et al., 2002
; our unpublished data), which seems to act as a retrieval signal in Golgi-to-ER recycling by the host receptor Rer1 (Sato et al., 1999
, 2001
).
Transiently expressed individual GFPTGBp3 is found in membrane bodies of different sizes located at the cell periphery in close association with the CW (Solovyev et al., 2000; Cowan et al., 2002
). TGBp3 expression has little effect on the basic structure of the ER in plant cells. However, TGBp3 synthesis results in the formation of new TGBp3-containing ER structures (peripheral bodies) connected with the cortical ER network (Zamyatnin et al., 2002
; Gorshkova et al., 2003
). The size of these bodies correlates with the amount of TGBp3 protein produced in a given cell (Zamyatnin et al., 2002
). Thus, TGBp3 is able to induce formation (or proliferation) of a specific subdomain of the cortical ER.
A clue to the subcellular location of the TGBp3-containing bodies comes from fluorescent microscopy of leaves infected with a PMTV GFPTGBp3-expressing virus vector (Cowan et al., 2002) and transgenic plants expressing PSLV GFPTGBp3 (Gorshkova et al., 2003
). When the protein is expressed in adjacent cells, the peripheral bodies formed in the two neighbouring cells are opposite to each other. The structural link that governs the formation of such twin bodies could be provided by PD (Cowan et al., 2002
) and specific staining of PD-associated callose confirms the localization of TGBp3-containing bodies alongside of PD (Gorshkova et al., 2003
).
Targeting of PSLV TGBp3 depends on a specific signal consisting of two parts, of which a central hydrophilic region conserved in all hordei-like TGBp3 (Fig. 4a) seems to be an oligomerization sequence (Cowan et al., 2002
; Gorshkova et al., 2003
; our unpublished data). Another part of the specific PD targeting signal of TGBp3 is located in the C-terminal transmembrane segment, which resembles a hydrophobic membrane-embedded segment that participates in forming a protein trafficking signal of mastrevirus MP (Kotlizky et al., 2000
). Similarly, localization of PVX TGBp3 to peripheral bodies depends on the only protein transmembrane segment (our unpublished data). Mutations in the hordeivirus TGBp3 signal result in localization of the protein in a granular network of tiny bodies visible as a reticulate pattern as if they are formed on the surface of cortical ER tubules (Solovyev et al., 2000
; our unpublished data). Thus, it appears that mutations in either part of the bipartite signal permit protein segregation to ER-exit sites but cannot mediate further protein trafficking to the final destination at PD-associated compartments (Fig. 6
).
Co-targeting of TGBp2 and TGBp3
In the presence of TGBp3, TGBp2 is re-targeted to peripheral bodies that resemble the structures observed in cells expressing TGBp3 (Solovyev et al., 2000). Perfect co-localization of co-expressed PSLV TGBp2 and TGBp3 in peripheral bodies has been demonstrated, confirming that the TGBp3 protein directs subcellular targeting of TGBp2 from the ER network to sites of TGBp3 location (Zamyatnin et al., 2002
). PVX TGBp3 also targets PVX TGBp2 to peripheral bodies, showing that TGBp3-directed trafficking of TGBp2 occurs in both hordei- and potex-like TGBs (Solovyev et al., 2000
).
Proteinprotein interactions that result in the formation of TGBp2TGBp3 complexes could be the mechanism by which the two proteins are co-targeted to peripheral bodies. However, co-expression of TGBp2 and TGBp3 mutants failed to identify regions potentially responsible for the interaction between TGBp2 and TGBp3 molecules (Solovyev et al., 2000). Further evidence for a sequence-independent co-targeting mechanism was obtained in experiments on co-expression of heterologous TGB proteins. Indeed, in spite of the absence of sequence similarity of TGBp3 proteins in hordei- and potex-like TGBs, PVX TGBp3 can target PSLV TGBp2 to peripheral bodies and PSLV TGBp3 can, likewise, target PVX TGBp2 (Solovyev et al., 2000
). Moreover, PSLV TGBp3 can also target totally unrelated membrane-bound MPs, such as the C4 protein of Faba bean necrotic yellows virus (genus Nanovirus) and the 6K protein of Beet yellows virus (genus Closterovirus), to peripheral bodies (Zamyatnin et al., 2002
). This suggests that a sequence-specific interaction of TGBp2 and TGBp3 molecules is unlikely to be involved in TGBp3-directed targeting of TGBp2 (Solovyev et al., 2000
; Zamyatnin et al., 2002
). Nevertheless, PMTV TGBp3 interacts physically with the homologous TGBp2 in a yeast two-hybrid system (Cowan et al., 2002
). Presumably, this interaction may depend on the residue composition of hydrophobic segments, enabling side chain interaction between membrane-embedded helices of proteins (Scholze et al., 2002
; Sjöberg & Garoff, 2003
).
Note that TGBp3 apparently does not traffick any integral membrane protein, since GFP derivatives statically retained in ER membranes by synthetic hydrophobic anchors are not targeted by TGBp3 (Zamyatnin et al., 2002). Thus, it appears that some functional feature(s), rather then a specific sequence, is responsible for efficient trafficking of membrane proteins by TGBp3. Such features could include specific localization and dynamics of the membrane proteins in the cell endomembrane system, including their ability to cycle between the ER and the Golgi (our unpublished data).
As noted above, an intermediate step of translocation of TGBp3 to PD involves its segregation in hypothetical TGBp3 islands' in ER membranes (ER-exit sites) (Fig. 6). These protein islands, which also include TGBp2, can be translocated using the targeting signal of TGBp3 to a specific receptor near PD in specific membrane containers (vesicles or tubules) (Stephens & Pepperkok, 2001
; Nebenführ, 2002
) delivered to the neck region of PD and fused there to cortical ER tubules (Fig. 6
) (Solovyev et al., 2000
; Cowan et al., 2002
; Zamyatnin et al., 2002
; Gorshkova et al., 2003
).
Targeting of TGBp1 by TGBp2/TGBp3
Unlike potexviral TGBp1, which is capable of moving intracellularly to a peripheral layer of cytoplasm and PD (Lough et al., 1998; Malcuit et al., 1999
; Morozov et al., 1999
; Yang et al., 2000
), hordei-like TGBp1 expressed individually is not targeted to specific sites at the cell periphery. However, when TGBp1 is expressed in the presence of other virus products, it localizes to the punctate structures at the CW (Erhardt et al., 1999b
, 2000
; Lawrence & Jackson, 2001a
). At higher magnification, these structures are visible as pairs of disconnected bodies on opposite sides of the CW, closely resembling the structures formed by GFPTGBp3 in close vicinity to PD (see above). Accordingly, GFPTGBp1 punctate bodies co-localized with callose (Erhardt et al., 2000
), confirming the immuno-gold detection of TGBp1 in PD of infected leaves (Erhardt et al., 1999b
). Experiments with chimeric virus genomes suggested TGBp2 and TGBp3 as the most probable components responsible for this localization. Indeed, a combination of TGBp1 with homologous TGBp2/TGBp3 was required for TGBp1 function, particularly trafficking to PD (Lauber et al., 1998
; Lough et al., 1998
, 2000
; Erhardt et al., 1999a
, 2000
; Solovyev et al., 1999
; Lawrence & Jackson, 2001a
; Zamyatnin et al., 2003
). Hence, the role of TGBp2/TGBp3 may be primarily a matter of intracellular delivery of TGBp1-formed transport-competent RNPs to PD (Fig. 6
).
There are indications that TGBp1 is actively, rather than passively, transported by TGBp2/TGBp3 to PD and that this process requires enzymatic activities of the protein. Mutations in the conserved sequence motifs in the NTPase/helicase domains of hordei-like TGBp1 not only blocked cell-to-cell movement of the virus but also abolished protein targeting to PD in the presence of TGBp2 and TGBp3 (Erhardt et al., 2000; Lawrence & Jackson, 2001a
; Zamyatnin et al., 2003
).
TGBp2-induced increase in PD permeability and other putative movement-related activities of TGBp2/p3 proteins
Some of the point and insertion mutants of TGBp2 are dominantnegative, i.e. they inhibit cell-to-cell movement and diminish virus accumulation (Beck et al., 1994; Seppanen et al., 1997
; Lauber et al., 2001
). The recently discovered ability of potex- and hordei-like TGBp2 to facilitate movement of GFP between adjacent epidermal cells (Tamai & Meshi, 2001
; our unpublished data) suggests that co-expression of a non-functional TGBp2 mutant during infection can interfere not only with viral RNP trafficking to PD but also with some additional movement-related function(s).
The molecular nature of the TGBp2-directed increase in PD permeability is enigmatic. However, a relationship between this phenomenon and modifications of the tissue stress-response system can be proposed. In particle bombardment studies, the ability of GFP, which is a 27 kDa protein, to spread from an initially transfected epidermal cell of source N. benthamiana leaves to neighbouring cells depends on experimental conditions. When the leaves of intact plants are bombarded, GFP spreads over multiple cell boundaries to give a focus of more than 30 fluorescent cells. However, GFP is confined mostly to single cells after bombardment of detached leaves in a vacuum chamber (Oparka et al., 1999; Crawford & Zambryski, 2000
, 2001
; Itaya et al., 2000
; Krishnamurthy et al., 2002
). Under the latter conditions, TGBp2 potentiates the spread of GFP to adjacent epidermal cells (Tamai & Meshi, 2001
). Various stress factors, including leaf detachment, are known to reduce PD SEL due to rapid callose deposition (Sivaguru et al., 2000
; Crawford & Zambryski, 2001
; Radford & White, 2001
; Roberts & Oparka, 2003
). Hence, it is possible that TGBp2 expression is not involved directly in increasing PD permeability but rather significantly decreases callose deposition in the CW and can thus inhibit or reverse the stress-induced decrease in PD SEL (Fig. 6
). In line with this hypothesis, potexvirus TGBp2 has been shown recently to interact with TIP, a host protein regulator of
-1,3-glucanase, which is a key enzyme of callose turnover (Fridborg et al., 2003
). Thus, keeping the PD neck region open by callose degradation (or prevention of callose accumulation) is a possible function of TGBp2 at the early stage of infection (Fridborg et al., 2003
). In this context, it is interesting that co-expression of TGBp3 and TGBp2 completely blocks the TGBp2-induced increase of PD SEL (our unpublished data). Probably, trapping of TGBp2 in the peripheral membrane bodies formed by TGBp3 in the vicinity of PD (see above) can either prevent interaction between TGBp2 and TIP or directly block intracellular trafficking of TIP.
Apart from trafficking of TGBp1 and genomic RNA and PD SEL control, small TGB proteins could be involved directly in regulating a hypersensitive response (Bleykasten-Grosshans et al., 1997; Solovyev et al., 1999
; Lauber et al., 2001
; Kobayashi et al., 2001
). We believe that this activity of TGBp2/p3 could also be related to the regulation of callose turnover in view of the fact that (i) limitation of PVX spread in a hypersensitive response is accompanied by heavy callose deposits in the vicinity of PD (Allison & Shalla, 1974
) and (ii) callose deposition may regulate virus movement in hypersensitive hosts by affecting the PD SEL (Iglesias & Meins, 2000
; Bucher et al., 2001
; Crawford & Zambryski, 2001
; Radford & White, 2001
).
![]() |
CONCLUSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Importantly, TMV MP, similar to NCAP CmPP16, is not capable of PD modification and trafficking between cells in the absence of an assisting cell protein, NCAPP1 (Lee et al., 2003). The dependence of TMV MP on NCAPP1 emphasizes the idea that viral MPs act in concert with a number of as yet undiscovered cell proteins required to accomplish intra- and intercellular steps in cell-to-cell movement. Thus, analysis of dissimilar virus transport systems that comprise several MPs may suggest possible roles of viral proteins that mimic components of host intracellular trafficking machinery.
TGBp1s share some features with NCAPs involved in plant development. First, ectopic expression of potexviral TGBp1 appears to cause defects in the cell-to-cell communications that control lateral organ development (Foster et al., 2002). Second, TGBp1 competes directly for intercellular trafficking pathways with NCAP Knotted-1 (Lough et al., 2000
). Third, the ability of NCAP CmPP16 to increase PD SEL and traffic through PD depends on an intracellular trafficking step directed by a membrane protein, NCAPP1, which localizes to cortical ER compartments in the vicinity of PD (Lee et al., 2003
), a pathway that parallels TGBp1 transport to PD-associated ER structures directed by TGBp2/TGBp3 (Fig. 6
) (Zamyatnin et al., 2002
, 2003
; Gorshkova et al., 2003
).
Carmo- and necroviruses (family Tombusviridae) have a transport system of two small MPs, an RNA-binding protein and a membrane protein (Fig. 7) (Hacker et al., 1992
; Marcos et al., 1999
; Vilar et al., 2002
). Therefore, in members of the family Tombusviridae, all energy-utilizing steps of movement likely depend on host proteins, a situation that is in contrast to TGB and other multicomponent transport systems. Particularly, in members of the family Potyviridae, cell-to-cell movement requires the CI protein (Fig. 7
), which is an SF-II helicase able to interact with PD and form conical deposits guiding potyviral filamentous virions to and through PD (Rodriguez-Cerezo et al., 1997
; Carrington et al., 1998
; Roberts et al., 1998
). However, it is not known whether the functions of the helicases in potexviruses and potyviruses (SF-I helicase TGBp1 and SF-II helicase CI) are similar. Viruses of the family Closteroviridae have no movement-related helicase but encode another ATPase, Hsp70h (Fig. 7
), which is related to a large group of cell chaperones (Hsp70s) involved in energy-coupled processes of protein folding, degradation and transport (Agranovsky et al., 1991
, 1997
; Ellis & Hartl, 1999
; Pilon & Schekman, 1999
). Hsp70h is required for cell-to-cell and long-distance movement as well as for infectivity of virus particles and assembly of movement-competent virions (Agranovsky et al., 1998
; Medina et al., 1999
; Peremyslov et al., 1999
; Napuli et al., 2000
; Alzhanova et al., 2001
; Prokhnevsky et al., 2002
; Dolja, 2003
). Similarly to TGBp1 and TGBp2/TGBp3 proteins (which mimic functions of NCAPs and NCAPP1, respectively), closteroviral Hsp70h may be the virus counterpart of a host component of a cell-to-cell movement machine.
|
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Agranovsky, A. A., Boyko, V. P., Karasev, A. V., Koonin, E. V. & Dolja, V. V. (1991). Putative 65 kDa protein of beet yellows closterovirus is a homologue of HSP70 heat shock proteins. J Mol Biol 217, 603610.[CrossRef][Medline]
Agranovsky, A. A., Folimonova, S. Yu., Folimonov, A. S., Denisenko, O. N. & Zinovkin, R. A. (1997). The beet yellows closterovirus p65 homologue of HSP70 chaperones has ATPase activity associated with its conserved N-terminal domain but does not interact with unfolded protein chains. J Gen Virol 78, 535542.[Abstract]
Agranovsky, A. A., Folimonov, A. S., Folimonova, S. Yu., Morozov, S. Yu., Schiemann, J., Lesemann, D. & Atabekov, J. G. (1998). Beet yellows closterovirus HSP70-like protein mediates the cell-to-cell movement of a potexvirus transport-deficient mutant and a hordeivirus-based chimeric virus. J Gen Virol 79, 889895.[Abstract]
Allison, A. V. & Shalla, T. A. (1974). The ultrastructure of local lesions induced by potato virus X: a sequence of cytological events in the course of infection. Phytopathology 64, 784793.
Alzhanova, D. V., Hagiwara, Y., Peremyslov, V. V. & Dolja, V. V. (2000). Genetic analysis of the cell-to-cell movement of beet yellows closterovirus. Virology 268, 192200.[CrossRef][Medline]
Alzhanova, D. V., Napuli, A. J., Creamer, R. & Dolja, V. V. (2001). Cell-to-cell movement and assembly of a plant closterovirus: roles for the capsid proteins and Hsp70 homolog. EMBO J 20, 69977007.
Angell, S. M., Davies, C. & Baulcombe, D. C. (1996). Cell-to-cell movement of potato virus X is associated with a change in the size-exclusion limit of plasmodesmata in trichome cells of Nicotiana clevelandii. Virology 216, 197201.[CrossRef][Medline]
Aoki, K., Kragler, F., Xoconostle-Cázares, B. & Lucas, W. J. (2002). A subclass of plant heat shock cognate 70 chaperones carries a motif that facilitates trafficking through plasmodesmata. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99, 1634216347.
Atabekov, J. G. & Dorokhov, Yu. L. (1984). Plant virus-specific transport function and resistance of plants to viruses. Adv Virus Res 29, 313364.[Medline]
Atabekov, J. G. & Taliansky, M. E. (1990). Expression of a plant virus-coded transport function by different viral genomes. Adv Virus Res 38, 201248.[Medline]
Atabekov, J. G., Rodionova, N. P., Karpova, O. V., Kozlovsky, S. V. & Poljakov, V. Y. (2000). The movement protein-triggered in situ conversion of potato virus X virion RNA from a nontranslatable into a translatable form. Virology 271, 259263.[CrossRef][Medline]
Baulcombe, D. (2002). Viral suppression of systemic silencing. Trends Microbiol 10, 306308.[CrossRef][Medline]
Beck, D. L., Guilford, P. J., Voot, D. M., Andersen, M. T. & Forster, R. L. (1991). Triple gene block proteins of white clover mosaic potexvirus are required for transport. Virology 183, 695702.[Medline]
Beck, D. L., Van Dolleweerd, C. J., Lough, T. J., Balmori, E., Voot, D. M., Andersen, M. T., O'Brien, I. E. & Forster, R. L. (1994). Disruption of virus movement confers broad-spectrum resistance against systemic infection by plant viruses with a triple gene block. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91, 1031010314.
Blackman, L. M. & Overall, R. L. (2001). Structure and function of plasmodesmata. Austr J Plant Physiol 28, 709727.
Bleykasten, C., Gilmer, D., Guilley, H., Richards, K. E. & Jonard, G. (1996). Beet necrotic yellow vein virus 42 kDa triple gene block protein binds nucleic acid in vitro. J Gen Virol 77, 889897.[Abstract]
Bleykasten-Grosshans, C., Guilley, H., Bouzoubaa, S., Richards, K. E. & Jonard, G. (1997). Independent expression of the first two triple gene block proteins of beet necrotic yellow vein virus complements virus defective in the corresponding gene but expression of the third protein inhibits viral cell-to-cell movement. Mol PlantMicrobe Interact 10, 240246.
Bouzoubaa, S., Ziegler, V., Beck, D., Guilley, H., Richards, K. & Jonard, G. (1986). Nucleotide sequence of beet necrotic yellow vein virus RNA-2. J Gen Virol 67, 16891700.
Brakke, M. K., Ball, E. M. & Langenberg, W. G. (1988). A non-capsid protein associated with unencapsidated virus RNA in barley infected with barley stripe mosaic virus. J Gen Virol 69, 481491.
Brandizzi, F., Fricker, M. & Hawes, C. (2002a). A greener world: the revolution in plant bioimaging. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3, 520530.[CrossRef][Medline]
Brandizzi, F., Snapp, E. L., Roberts, A. G., Lippincott-Schwartz, J. & Hawes, C. (2002b). Membrane protein transport between the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi in tobacco leaves is energy dependent but cytoskeleton independent: evidence from selective photobleaching. Plant Cell 14, 12931309.
Bucher, G. L., Tarina, C., Heinlein, M., Di Serio, F., Meins, F., Jr & Iglesias, V. A. (2001). Local expression of enzymatically active class I -1,3-glucanase enhances symptoms of TMV infection in tobacco. Plant J 28, 361369.[CrossRef][Medline]
Buck, K. W. (1996). Comparison of the replication of positive-stranded RNA viruses of plants and animals. Adv Virus Res 47, 159251.[Medline]
Callaway, A., Giesman-Cookmeyer, D., Gillock, E. T., Sit, T. L. & Lommel, S. A. (2001). The multifunctional capsid proteins of plant RNA viruses. Annu Rev Phytopathol 39, 419460.[CrossRef][Medline]
Carrington, J. C., Kasschau, K. D., Mahajan, S. K. & Schaad, M. C. (1996). Cell-to-cell and long-distance transport of viruses in plants. Plant Cell 8, 16691681.
Carrington, J. C., Jensen, P. E. & Schaad, M. C. (1998). Genetic evidence for an essential role for potyvirus CI protein in cell-to-cell movement. Plant J 14, 393400.[CrossRef][Medline]
Carrington, J. C., Kasschau, K. D. & Johansen, L. K. (2001). Activation and suppression of RNA silencing by plant viruses. Virology 281, 15.[CrossRef][Medline]
Caruthers, J. M. & McKay, D. B. (2002). Helicase structure and mechanism. Curr Opin Struct Biol 12, 123133.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chapman, S., Hills, G., Watts, J. & Baulcombe, D. (1992). Mutational analysis of the coat protein gene of potato virus X: effects on virion morphology and viral pathogenicity. Virology 191, 223230.[Medline]
Cheng, W., Brendza, K. M., Gauss, G. H., Korolev, S., Waksman, G. & Lohman, T. M. (2002). The 2B domain of the Escherichia coli Rep protein is not required for DNA helicase activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99, 1600616011.
Citovsky, V. & Zambryski, P. (1993). Transport of nucleic acids through membrane channels: snaking through small holes. Annu Rev Microbiol 47, 167197.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cowan, G. H., Lioliopoulou, F., Ziegler, A. & Torrance, L. (2002). Subcellular localisation, protein interactions, and RNA binding of potato mop-top virus triple gene block proteins. Virology 298, 106115.[CrossRef][Medline]
Crawford, K. M. & Zambryski, P. C. (2000). Subcellular localization determines the availability of non-targeted proteins to plasmodesmatal transport. Curr Biol 10, 10321040.[CrossRef][Medline]
Crawford, K. M. & Zambryski, P. C. (2001). Non-targeted and targeted protein movement through plasmodesmata in leaves in different developmental and physiological states. Plant Physiol 125, 18021812.
Dangl, J. L. & Jones, J. D. G. (2001). Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection. Nature 411, 826833.[CrossRef][Medline]
Deom, C. M, Oliver, M. I. & Beachy, R. N. (1987). The 30-kilodalton gene product of tobacco mosaic virus potentiates virus movement. Science 237, 389394.
Dolja, V. V. (2003). Beet yellows virus: the importance of being different. Mol Plant Pathol 4, 9198.[CrossRef]
Dolja, V. V., Grama, D. P., Morozov, S. Yu. & Atabekov, J. G. (1987). Potato virus X-related single- and double-stranded RNA. Characterization and identification of terminal structures. FEBS Lett 214, 308312.[CrossRef]
Donald, R. G., Zhou, H. & Jackson, A. O. (1993). Serological analysis of barley stripe mosaic virus-encoded proteins in infected barley. Virology 195, 659668.[CrossRef][Medline]
Donald, R. G. K., Petty, I. T. D., Zhou, H. & Jackson, A. O. (1995). Properties of genes influencing barley stripe mosaic virus movement phenotypes. In Fifth International Symposium on Biotechnology and Plant Protection: Viral Pathogenesis and Disease Resistance, pp. 135147. Singapore: World Scientific.
Donald, R. G., Lawrence, D. M. & Jackson, A. O. (1997). The barley stripe mosaic virus 58-kilodalton b protein is a multifunctional RNA binding protein. J Virol 71, 15381546.[Abstract]
Du, M. X., Johnson, R. B., Sun, X. L., Staschke, K. A., Colacino, J. & Wang, Q. M. (2002). Comparative characterization of two DEAD-box RNA helicases in superfamily II: human translation-initiation factor 4A and hepatitis C virus non-structural protein 3 (NS3) helicase. Biochem J 363, 147155.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dunoyer, P., Pfeffer, S., Fritsch, C., Hemmer, O., Voinnet, O. & Richards, K. E. (2002a). Identification, subcellular localization and some properties of a cysteine-rich suppressor of gene silencing encoded by peanut clump virus. Plant J 29, 555567.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dunoyer, P., Ritzenthaler, C., Hemmer, O., Michler, P. & Fritsch, C. (2002b). Intracellular localization of the peanut clump replication complex in tobacco BY-2 protoplasts containing green fluorescent protein-labeled endoplasmic reticulum or Golgi apparatus. J Virol 76, 865874.
Ellis, R. J. & Hartl, F. U. (1999). Principles of protein folding in the cellular environment. Curr Opin Struct Biol 9, 102110.[CrossRef][Medline]
Erhardt, M., Herzog, E., Lauber, E., Fritsch, C., Guilley, H., Jonard, G., Richards, K. & Bouzoubaa, S. (1999a). Transgenic plants expressing the TGB1 protein of peanut clump virus complement movement of TGB1-defective peanut clump virus but not of TGB1-defective beet necrotic yellow vein virus. Plant Cell Rep 18, 614619.[CrossRef]
Erhardt, M., Stussi-Garaud, C., Guilley, H., Richards, K. E., Jonard, G. & Bouzoubaa, S. (1999b). The first triple gene block protein of peanut clump virus localizes to the plasmodesmata during virus infection. Virology 264, 220229.[CrossRef][Medline]
Erhardt, M., Morant, M., Ritzenthaler, C., Stussi-Garaud, C., Guilley, H., Richards, K. E., Jonard, G., Bouzoubaa, S. & Gilmer, D. (2000). P42 movement protein of beet necrotic yellow vein virus is targeted by the movement proteins p13 and p15 to punctate bodies associated with plasmodesmata. Mol PlantMicrobe Interact 13, 520528.[Medline]
Fedoroff, N. V. (2002). RNA-binding proteins in plants: the tip of an iceberg? Curr Opin Plant Biol 5, 452459.[CrossRef][Medline]
Forster, R. L., Bevan, M. W., Harbison, S. A. & Gardner, R. C. (1988). The complete nucleotide sequence of the potexvirus white clover mosaic virus. Nucleic Acids Res 16, 291303.[Abstract]
Forster, R. L., Beck, D. L., Guilford, P. J., Voot, D. M., Van Dolleweerd, C. J. & Andersen, M. T. (1992). The coat protein of white clover mosaic potexvirus has a role in facilitating cell-to-cell transport in plants. Virology 191, 480484.[Medline]
Foster, T. M., Lough, T. J., Emerson, S. J., Lee, R. H., Bowman, J. L., Forster, R. L. S. & Lucas, W. J. (2002). A surveillance system regulates selective entry of RNA into the shoot apex. Plant Cell 14, 14971508.
Fridborg, I., Grainger, J., Page, A., Coleman, M., Findlay, K. & Angell, S. (2003). TIP, a novel host factor linking callose degradation with the cell-to-cell movement of Potato virus X. Mol PlantMicrobe Interact 16, 132140.[Medline]
Gafvelin, G., Sakaguchi, M., Andersson, H. & von Heijne, G. (1997). Topological rules for membrane protein assembly for eukaryotic cells. J Biol Chem 272, 61196127.
Ghoshroy, S., Lartey, R., Sheng, J. & Citovsky, V. (1997). Transport of proteins and nucleic acids through plasmodesmata. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 48, 2749.[CrossRef]
Gilmer, D., Bouzoubaa, S., Hehn, A., Guilley, H., Richards, K. & Jonard, G. (1992). Efficient cell-to-cell movement of beet necrotic yellow vein virus requires 3' proximal genes located on RNA 2. Virology 189, 4047.[Medline]
Gorbalenya, A. E. & Koonin, E. V. (1993). Helicases: amino acid sequence comparisons and structurefunction relationships. Curr Opin Struct Biol 3, 419429.
Gorbalenya, A. E., Koonin, E. V., Donchenko, A. P. & Blinov, V. M. (1989). Two related superfamilies of putative helicases involved in replication, recombination, repair and expression of DNA and RNA genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 17, 47134730.[Abstract]
Gorshkova, E. N., Erokhina, T. N., Stroganova, T. A., Yelina, N. E., Zamyatnin, A. A., Jr, Kalinina, N. O., Schiemann, J., Solovyev, A. G. & Morozov, S. Yu. (2003). Immunodetection and fluorescent microscopy of transgenically expressed hordeivirus TGBp3 movement protein reveals its association with endoplasmic reticulum elements in close proximity to plasmodesmata. J Gen Virol 84, 985994.
Guilford, P. J. & Forster, R. L. S. (1986). Detection of polyadenylated subgenomic RNAs in leaves infected with daphne virus X. J Gen Virol 67, 8390.
Hacker, D. L., Petty, I. T., Wei, N. & Morris, T. J. (1992). Turnip crinkle virus genes required for RNA replication and virus movement. Virology 186, 18.[Medline]
Haywood, V., Kragler, F. & Lucas, W. J. (2002). Plasmodesmata: pathways for protein and ribonucleoprotein signaling. Plant Cell 14 (Suppl. 1), S303S325.
Hefferon, K. L., Doyle, S. & Abouhaidar, M. G. (1997). Immunological detection of the 8K protein of potato virus X (PVX) in cell walls of PVX-infected tobacco and transgenic potato. Arch Virol 142, 425433.[CrossRef][Medline]
Heinlein, M. (2002a). The spread of tobacco mosaic virus infection: insights into the cellular mechanism of RNA transport. Cell Mol Life Sci 59, 5882.[CrossRef][Medline]
Heinlein, M. (2002b). Plasmodesmata: dynamic regulation and role in macromolecular cell-to-cell signaling. Curr Opin Plant Biol 5, 110.[CrossRef]
Herzog, E., Hemmer, O., Hauser, S., Meyer, G., Bouzoubaa, S. & Fritsch, C. (1998). Identification of genes involved in replication and movement of peanut clump virus. Virology 248, 312322.[CrossRef][Medline]
Holt, B. F., III, Hubert, D. A. & Dangl, J. L. (2003). Resistance gene signaling in plants complex similarities to animal innate immunity. Curr Opin Immunol 15, 2025.[CrossRef][Medline]
Huisman, M. J., Linthorst, H. J., Bol, J. F. & Cornelissen, J. C. (1988). The complete nucleotide sequence of potato virus X and its homologies at the amino acid level with various plus-stranded RNA viruses. J Gen Virol 69, 17891798.[Abstract]
Hull, R. (1989). The movement of viruses in plant. Annu Rev Phytopathol 27, 213240.[CrossRef]
Iglesias, V. A. & Meins, F., Jr (2000). Movement of plant viruses is delayed in a -1,3-glucanase-deficient mutant showing a reduced plasmodesmatal size exclusion limit and enhanced callose deposition. Plant J 21, 157166.[CrossRef][Medline]
Itaya, A., Liang, G., Woo, Y.-M., Nelson, R. S. & Ding, B. (2000). Non-specific intercellular protein trafficking probed by green-fluorescent protein plants. Protoplasma 213, 165175.
Jankowsky, E., Gross, C. H., Shuman, S. & Pyle, A. M. (2001). Active disruption of an RNA-protein interaction by a DExH/D RNA helicase. Science 291, 121125.
Jiang, L. & Rogers, J. C. (1998). Integral membrane protein sorting to vacuoles in plant cells: evidence for two pathways. J Cell Biol 143, 11831199.
Juuti, J. T., Bamford, D. H., Tuma, R. & Thomas, G. J., Jr (1998). Structure and NTPase activity of the RNA-translocating protein (P4) of bacteriophage 6. J Mol Biol 279, 347359.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kadare, G. & Haenni, A. L. (1997). Virus-encoded RNA helicases. J Virol 71, 25832590.
Kalinina, N. O., Fedorkin, O. N., Samuilova, O. V., Maiss, E., Korpela, T., Morozov, S. Yu. & Atabekov, J. G. (1996). Expression and biochemical analyses of the recombinant potato virus X 25K movement protein. FEBS Lett 397, 7578.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kalinina, N. O., Samuilova, O. V., Fedorkin, O. N., Zelenina, D. A. & Morozov, S. Yu. (1998). Biochemical characterization and subcellular localization of a 25K transport protein of potato virus X. Molekulyarnaya Biologiya (Moscow) 32, 569573 (in Russian).
Kalinina, N. O., Rakitina, D. A., Yelina, N. E. & 9 other authors (2001). RNA-binding properties of the 63 kDa protein encoded by the triple gene block of poa semilatent hordeivirus. J Gen Virol 82, 25692578.
Kalinina, N. O., Rakitina, D. V., Solovyev, A. G., Schiemann, J. & Morozov, S. Yu. (2002). RNA helicase activity of the plant virus movement proteins encoded by the first gene of the triple gene block. Virology 296, 321329.[CrossRef][Medline]
Karpova, O. V., Kozlovsky, S. V., Arkhipenko, M. V., Rodionova, N. P. & Atabekov, J. G. (1999). Complexes of tobacco mosaic virus RNA with a hordeivirus movement protein are infectious in plants susceptible to both viruses. Doklady RAN (Moscow) 368, 406409 (in Russian).
Kobayashi, K., Cabral, S., Calamante, G., Maldonado, S. & Mentaberry, A. (2001). Transgenic tobacco plants expressing the potato virus X open reading frame 3 gene develop specific resistance and necrotic ring symptoms after infection with the homologous virus. Mol PlantMicrobe Interact 14, 12741285.[Medline]
Koenig, R., Pleij, C. W., Beier, C. & Commandeur, U. (1998). Genome properties of beet virus Q, a new furo-like virus from sugarbeet, determined from unpurified virus. J Gen Virol 79, 20272036.[Abstract]
Koonin, E. V. & Dolja, V. V. (1993). Evolution and taxonomy of positive-strand RNA viruses: implications of comparative analysis of amino acid sequences. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 28, 375430.[Abstract]
Kotlizky, G., Boulton, M. I., Pitaksutheepong, C., Davies, J. W. & Epel, B. L. (2000). Intracellular and intercellular movement of maize streak geminivirus V1 and V2 proteins transiently expressed as green fluorescent protein fusions. Virology 274, 3238.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kragler, F., Monzer, J., Shash, K., Xoconostle-Cazares, B. & Lucas, W. J. (1998). Cell-to-cell transport of proteins: requirement for unfolding and characterization of binding to a putative plasmodesmal receptor. Plant J 15, 367381.[CrossRef]
Krishnamurthy, K., Mitra, R., Payton, M. E. & Verchot-Lubicz, J. (2002). Cell-to-cell movement of the PVX 12K, 8K, or coat proteins may depend on the host, leaf developmental stage, and the PVX 25K protein. Virology 300, 269281.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lauber, E., Bleykasten-Grosshans, C., Erhardt, M., Bouzoubaa, S., Jonard, G., Richards, K. E. & Guilley, H. (1998). Cell-to-cell movement of beet necrotic yellow vein virus. I. Heterologous complementation experiments provide evidence for specific interactions among the triple gene block proteins. Mol PlantMicrobe Interact 11, 618625.[Medline]
Lauber, E., Janssens, L., Weyens, G., Jonard, G., Richards, K. E., Lefebvre, M. & Guilley, H. (2001). Rapid screening for dominant negative mutations in the beet necrotic yellow vein virus triple gene block proteins P13 and P15 using a viral replicon. Transgenic Res 10, 293302.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lawrence, D. M. & Jackson, A. O. (2001a). Interactions of the TGB1 protein during cell-to-cell movement of barley stripe mosaic virus. J Virol 75, 87128723.
Lawrence, D. M. & Jackson, A. O. (2001b). Requirements for cell-to-cell movement of barley stripe mosaic virus in monocot and dicot hosts. Mol Plant Pathol 2, 6575.[CrossRef]
Lazarowitz, S. G. (1999). Probing plant cell structure and function with viral movement proteins. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2, 332328.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lazarowitz, S. G. & Beachy, R. N. (1999). Viral movement proteins as probes for intracellular and intercellular trafficking in plants. Plant Cell 11, 535548.
Lee, J.-Y., Yoo, B.-C., Rojas, M. R., Gomez-Ospina, N., Staehelin, L. A. & Lucas, W. J. (2003). Selective trafficking of non-cell-autonomous proteins mediated by NtNCAPP1. Science 299, 392396.
Lehto, K., Bubrick, P. & Dawson, W. O. (1990). Time course of TMV 30K protein accumulation in intact leaves. Virology 174, 290293.[Medline]
Leisner, S. M. (1999). Molecular basis of virus transport in plants. In Molecular Biology of Plant Viruses, pp. 161182. Edited by C. L. Mandahar. Boston/Dordrecht/London: Kluwer.
Leonard, D. A. & Zaitlin, M. (1982). A temperature-sensitive strain of tobacco mosaic virus defective in cell-to-cell movement generate an altered virus-coded protein. Virology 117, 416424.
Liou, D.-Y., Hsu, Y.-H., Wung, C.-H., Wang, W.-H., Lin, N.-S. & Chang, B.-Y. (2000). Functional analyses and identification of two arginine residues essential to the ATP-utilizing activity of the triple gene block protein 1 of bamboo mosaic potexvirus. Virology 277, 336344.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lough, T. J., Shash, K., Xoconostle-Cazares, B., Hofstra, K. R., Beck, D. L., Balmori, E., Forster, R. L. & Lucas, W. J. (1998). Molecular dissection of the mechanism by which potexvirus triple gene block proteins mediate cell-to-cell transport of infectious RNA. Mol PlantMicrobe Interact 11, 801814.
Lough, T. J., Netzler, N. E., Emerson, S. J., Sutherland, P., Carr, F., Beck, D. L., Lucas, W. J. & Forster, R. L. (2000). Cell-to-cell movement of potexviruses: evidence for a ribonucleic protein complex involving the coat protein and first triple gene block protein. Mol PlantMicrobe Interact 13, 962974.[Medline]
Lough, T. J., Emerson, S. J., Lucas, W. J. & Forster, R. L. (2001). Trans-complementation of long-distance movement of white clover mosaic virus triple gene block (TGB) mutants: phloem-associated movement of TGBp1. Virology 288, 1828.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lucas, W. J. (1999). Plasmodesmata and the cell-to-cell transport of proteins and nucleoprotein complexes. J Exp Bot 50, 979987.[Abstract]
Lucas, W. J., Yoo, B.-C. & Kragler, F. (2001). RNA as a long-distance information macromolecules in plants. Nature Rev Mol Cell Biol 2, 849857.[CrossRef][Medline]
Malcuit, I., Marano, M. R., Kavanagh, T. A., De Jong, W., Forsyth, A. & Baulcombe, D. C. (1999). The 25-kDa movement protein of PVX elicits Nb-mediated hypersensitive cell death in potato. Mol PlantMicrobe Interact 12, 536543.
Marcos, J. F., Vilar, M., Perez-Paya, E. & Pallas, V. (1999). In vivo detection, RNA-binding properties and characterization of the RNA-binding domain of the p7 putative movement protein from carnation mottle carmovirus (CarMV). Virology 255, 354365.[CrossRef][Medline]
McGeachy, K. D. & Barker, H. (2000). Potato mop-top virus RNA can move long distance in the absence of coat protein: evidence from resistant, transgenic plants. Mol PlantMicrobe Interact 13, 125128.[Medline]
Medina, V., Peremyslov, V. V., Hagiwara, Y. & Dolja, V. V. (1999). Subcellular localization of the HSP70-homolog encoded by beet yellows closterovirus. Virology 260, 173181.[CrossRef][Medline]
Melcher, U. (2000). The 30K superfamily of viral movement proteins. J Gen Virol 81, 257266.
Mitchell, P. & Tollervey, D. (2001). mRNA turnover. Curr Opin Cell Biol 13, 320325.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mitsuhashi, N., Hayashi, Y., Koumoto, Y., Shimada, T., Fukasawa-Akada, T., Nishimura, M. & Hara-Nishimura, I. (2001). A novel membrane protein that is transported to protein storage vacuoles via precursor-accumulating vesicles. Plant Cell 13, 23612372.
Morozov, S. Yu. & Solovyev, A. G. (1999). Genome organization in RNA viruses. In Molecular Biology of Plant Viruses, pp. 4798. Edited by C. L. Mandahar. Boston/Dordrecht/London: Kluwer.
Morozov, S. Yu., Lukasheva, L. I., Chernov, B. K., Skryabin, K. G. & Atabekov, J. G. (1987). Nucleotide sequence of the open reading frames adjacent to the coat protein cistron in potato virus X genome. FEBS Lett 213, 438442.[CrossRef]
Morozov, S. Yu., Dolja, V. V. & Atabekov, J. G. (1989). Probable reassortment of genomic elements among elongated RNA-containing plant viruses. J Mol Evol 29, 5262.[Medline]
Morozov, S. Yu., Miroshnichenko, N. A., Zelenina, D. A., Fedorkin, O. N., Solovijev, A. G., Lukasheva, L. I. & Atabekov, J. C. (1990). Expression of RNA transcripts of potato virus X full-length and subgenomic cDNAs. Biochimie 72, 677684.[CrossRef][Medline]
Morozov, S. Yu., Miroshnichenko, N. A., Solovyev, A. G., Zelenina, D. A., Fedorkin, O. N., Lukasheva, L. I., Grachev, S. A. & Chernov, B. K. (1991a). In vitro membrane binding of the translation products of the carlavirus 7-kDa protein genes. Virology 183, 782785.[Medline]
Morozov, S. Yu., Miroshnichenko, N. A., Solovyev, A. G., Fedorkin, O. N., Zelenina, D. A., Lukasheva, L. I., Karasev, A. V., Dolja, V. V. & Atabekov, J. G. (1991b). Expression strategy of the potato virus X triple gene block. J Gen Virol 72, 20392042.[Abstract]
Morozov, S. Yu., Fedorkin, O. N., Juttner, G., Schiemann, J., Baulcombe, D. C. & Atabekov, J. G. (1997). Complementation of a potato virus X mutant mediated by bombardment of plant tissues with cloned viral movement protein genes. J Gen Virol 78, 20772083.[Abstract]
Morozov, S. Yu., Solovyev, A. G., Kalinina, N. O., Fedorkin, O. N., Samuilova, O. V., Schiemann, J. & Atabekov, J. G. (1999). Evidence for two nonoverlapping functional domains in the potato virus X 25K movement protein. Virology 260, 5563.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mushegian, A. R. & Koonin, E. V. (1993). Cell-to-cell movement of plant viruses. Insights from amino acid sequence comparisons of movement proteins and from analogies with cellular transport systems. Arch Virol 133, 239257.[Medline]
Napuli, A. J., Falk, B. W. & Dolja, V. V. (2000). Interaction between HSP70 homolog and filamentous virions of Beet yellows virus. Virology 274, 232239.[CrossRef][Medline]
Napuli, A. J., Alzhanova, D. V., Doneanu, C. E., Barofsky, D. F., Koonin, E. V. & Dolja, V. V. (2003). The 64-Kilodalton capsid protein homolog of Beet yellows virus is required for assembly of virion tails. J Virol 77, 23772384.
Nebenführ, A. (2002). Vesicle traffic in the endomembrane system: a tale of COPs, Rabs and SNAREs. Curr Opin Plant Biol 13, 97105.
Niesbach-Klösgen, U., Guilley, H., Jonard, G. & Richards, K. (1990). Immunodetection in vivo of beet necrotic yellow vein virus-encoded proteins. Virology 178, 5261.[Medline]
Ohno, T., Takamatsu, N., Meshi, T., Okada, Y., Nishiguchi, M. & Kiho, Y. (1983). Single amino acid substitution in 30K protein of TMV defective in virus transport function. Virology 131, 255258.[Medline]
Oparka, K. J., Roberts, A. G., Boevink, P., Santa Cruz, S., Roberts, I., Pradel, K. S., Imlau, A., Kotlizky, G., Sauer, N. & Epel, B. (1999). Simple, but not branched, plasmodesmata allow the nonspecific trafficking of proteins in developing tobacco leaves. Cell 97, 743754.[Medline]
Peng, C. W., Peremyslov, V. V., Mushegian, A. R., Dawson, W. O. & Dolja, V. V. (2001). Functional specialization and evolution of leader proteinases in the family Closteroviridae. J Virol 75, 1215312160.
Peng, C. W., Peremyslov, V. V., Snijder, E. J. & Dolja, V. V. (2002). A replication-competent chimera of plant and animal viruses. Virology 294, 7584.[CrossRef][Medline]
Peng, C. W., Napuli, A. J. & Dolja, V. V. (2003). Leader proteinase of Beet yellows virus functions in long-distance transport. J Virol 77, 28432849.
Peremyslov, V. V., Hagiwara, Y. & Dolja, V. V. (1999). HSP70 homolog functions in cell-to-cell movement of a plant virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96, 1477114776.
Petty, I. T. & Jackson, A. O. (1990). Mutational analysis of barley stripe mosaic virus RNA . Virology 179, 712718.[Medline]
Petty, I. T., French, R., Jones, R. W. & Jackson, A. O. (1990). Identification of barley stripe mosaic virus genes involved in viral RNA replication and systemic movement. EMBO J 9, 34533457.[Abstract]
Pilipenko, E. V., Viktorova, E. G., Guest, S. T., Agol, V. I. & Roos, R. P. (2001). Cell-specific proteins regulate viral RNA translation and virus-induced disease. EMBO J 20, 68996908.
Pilon, M. & Schekman, R. (1999). Protein translocation: how Hsp70 pulls it off. Cell 97, 679682.[Medline]
Plante, C. A., Kim, K. H., Pillai-Nair, N., Osman, T. A., Buck, K. W. & Hemenway, C. L. (2000). Soluble, template-dependent extracts from Nicotiana benthamiana plants infected with potato virus X transcribe both plus- and minus-strand RNA templates. Virology 275, 444451.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ploubidou, A. & Way, M. (2001). Viral transport and the cytoskeleton. Curr Opin Cell Biol 13, 97105.[CrossRef][Medline]
Prokhnevsky, A. I., Peremyslov, V. V., Napuli, A. J. & Dolja, V. V. (2002). Interaction between long-distance transport factor and Hsp70-related movement protein of beet yellows virus. J Virol 76, 1100311011.
Radford, J. E. & White, R. G. (2001). Effects of tissue preparation-induced callose synthesis on estimates of plasmodesmata size exclusion limits. Protoplasma 216, 4755.[Medline]
Rajamaki, M. L. & Valkonen, J. P. (1999). The 6K2 protein and the VPg of potato virus A are determinants of systemic infection in Nicandra physaloides. Mol PlantMicrobe Interact 12, 10741081.[Medline]
Revers, F., Le Gall, O., Candresse, T. & Maule, A. J. (1999). New advances in understanding the molecular biology of plant/potyvirus interactions. Mol PlantMicrobe Interact 12, 367376.
Roberts, A. G. & Oparka, K. J. (2003). Plasmodesmata and the control of symplastic transport. Plant Cell Environ 26, 103124.[CrossRef]
Roberts, I. M., Wang, D., Findlay, K. & Maule, A. J. (1998). Ultrastructural and temporal observations of the potyvirus cylindrical inclusions (CIs) show that the CI protein acts transiently in aiding virus movement. Virology 245, 173181.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rodriguez-Cerezo, E., Findlay, K., Shaw, J. G., Lomonossoff, G. P., Qiu, S. G., Linstead, P., Shanks, M. & Risco, C. (1997). The coat and cylindrical inclusion proteins of a potyvirus are associated with connections between plant cells. Virology 236, 296306.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rojas, M. R., Zerbini, F. M., Allison, R. F., Gilbertson, R. L. & Lucas, W. J. (1997). Capsid protein and helper component-proteinase function as potyvirus cell-to-cell movement proteins. Virology 237, 283295.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rouleau, M., Smith, R. J., Bancroft, J. B. & Mackie, G. A. (1994). Purification, properties, and subcellular localization of foxtail mosaic potexvirus 26-kDa protein. Virology 204, 254265.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rupasov, V. V., Morozov, S. Yu., Kanyuka, K. V. & Zavriev, S. K. (1989). Partial nucleotide sequence of potato virus M RNA shows similarities to potexviruses in gene arrangement and the encoded amino acid sequences. J Gen Virol 70, 18611869.[Abstract]
Saenz, P., Salvador, B., Simon-Mateo, C., Kasschau, K. D., Carrington, J. C. & Garcia, J. A. (2002). Host-specific involvement of the HC protein in the long-distance movement of potyviruses. J Virol 76, 19221931.
Santa Cruz, S., Roberts, A. G., Prior, D. A. M., Chapman, S. & Oparka, K. J. (1998). Cell-to-cell and phloem-mediated transport of potato virus X: the role of virions. Plant Cell 10, 495510.
Sato, K., Ueda, T. & Nakano, A. (1999). The Arabidopsis thaliana RER1 gene family: its potential role in the endoplasmic reticulum localization of membrane proteins. Plant Mol Biol 41, 815824.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sato, K., Sato, M. & Nakano, A. (2001). Rer1p, a retrieval receptor for endoplasmic reticulum membrane proteins, is dynamically localized to the Golgi apparatus by coatomer. J Cell Biol 152, 935944.
Schmitt, C., Balmori, E., Jonard, G., Richards, K. E. & Guilley, H. (1992). In vitro mutagenesis of biologically active transcripts of beet necrotic yellow vein virus RNA 2: evidence that a domain of the 75-kDa readthrough protein is important for efficient virus assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89, 57155719.[Abstract]
Scholze, P., Freissmuth, M. & Sitte, H. H. (2002). Mutations within an intramembrane leucine heptad repeat disrupt oligomer formation of the rat GABA transporter 1. J Biol Chem 277, 4368243690.
Schwartz, M., Chen, J., Janda, M., Sullivan, M., den Boon, J. & Ahlquist, P. (2002). A positive-strand RNA virus replication complex parallels form and function of retrovirus capsids. Mol Cell 9, 505514.[Medline]
Schwer, B. (2001). A new twist on RNA helicases: DExH/D box proteins as RNPases. Nature Struct Biol 8, 113116.[CrossRef][Medline]
Seppanen, P., Puska, R., Honkanen, J., Tyulkina, L. G., Fedorkin, O., Morozov, S. Yu. & Atabekov, J. G. (1997). Movement protein-derived resistance to triple gene block-containing plant viruses. J Gen Virol 78, 12411246.[Abstract]
Sipos, L. & Von Heijne, G. (1993). Predicting the topology of eucaryotic membrane proteins. Eur J Biochem 213, 13331340.[Abstract]
Sit, T. L. & Abouhaidar, M. G. (1993). Infectious RNA transcripts derived from cloned cDNA of papaya mosaic virus: effect of mutations to the capsid and polymerase proteins. J Gen Virol 74, 11331140.[Abstract]
Sivaguru, M., Fujiwara, T., Samaj, J. & 7 other authors (2000). Aluminium-induced -1,3-glucan inhibits cell-to-cell trafficking of molecules through plasmodesmata. A new mechanism of aluminium toxicity in plants. Plant Physiol 124, 9911005.
Sjöberg, M. & Garoff, H. (2003). Interactions between the transmembrane segments of the alphavirus E1 and E2 proteins play a role in virus budding and fusion. J Virol 77, 34413450.
Skryabin, K. G., Morozov, S. Yu., Kraev, A. S., Rozanov, M. N., Chernov, B. K., Lukasheva, L. I. & Atabekov, J. G. (1988). Conserved and variable elements in RNA genomes of potexviruses. FEBS Lett 240, 3340.[CrossRef][Medline]
Solovyev, A. G., Savenkov, E. I., Agranovsky, A. A. & Morozov, S. Yu. (1996). Comparisons of the genomic cis-elements and coding regions in RNA components of the hordeiviruses barley stripe mosaic virus, lychnis ringspot virus, and poa semilatent virus. Virology 219, 918.[CrossRef][Medline]
Solovyev, A. G., Savenkov, E. I., Grdzelishvili, V. Z., Kalinina, N. O., Morozov, S. Yu., Schiemann, J. & Atabekov, J. G. (1999). Movement of hordeivirus hybrids with exchanges in the triple gene block. Virology 253, 278287.[CrossRef][Medline]
Solovyev, A. G., Stroganova, T. A., Zamyatnin, A. A., Jr, Fedorkin, O. N., Schiemann, J. & Morozov, S. Yu. (2000). Subcellular sorting of small membrane-associated triple gene block proteins: TGBp3-assisted targeting of TGBp2. Virology 269, 113127.[CrossRef][Medline]
Soultanas, P. & Wigley, D. B. (2001). Unwinding the Gordian knot of helicase action. Trends Biochem Sci 26, 4754.[CrossRef][Medline]
Stephens, D. J. & Pepperkok, R. (2001). Illuminating the secretory pathway: when do we need vesicles? J Cell Sci 114, 10531059.
Tamai, A. & Meshi, T. (2001). Cell-to-cell movement of potato virus X: the role of p12 and p8 encoded by the second and third open reading frames of the triple gene block. Mol PlantMicrobe Interact 14, 11581167.[Medline]
Thomas, C. L. & Maule, A. J. (2000). Limitations on the use of fused green fluorescent protein to investigate structurefunction relationships for the cauliflower mosaic virus movement protein. J Gen Virol 81, 18511855.
Tseng, S. S., Weaver, P. L., Liu, Y., Hitomi, M., Tartakoff, A. M. & Chang, T. H. (1998). Dbp5p, a cytosolic RNA helicase, is required for poly(A)+ RNA export. EMBO J 17, 26512662.
Tzfira, T., Rhee, Y., Chen, M. H., Kunik, T. & Citovsky, V. (2000). Nucleic acid transport in plantmicrobe interactions: the molecules that walk through the walls. Annu Rev Microbiol 54, 187219.[CrossRef][Medline]
Vance, V. & Vaucheret, H. (2001). RNA silencing in plants: defense and counterdefense. Science 292, 22772280.
Verchot, J., Angell, S. M. & Baulcombe, D. C. (1998). In vivo translation of the triple gene block of potato virus X requires two subgenomic mRNAs. J Virol. 72, 83168320.
Vilar, M., Sauri, A., Monne, M., Marcos, J. F., von Heijne, G., Perez-Paya, E. & Mingarro, I. (2002). Insertion and topology of a plant viral movement protein in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. J Biol Chem 277, 2344723452.
Vitale, A. & Denecke, J. (1999). The endoplasmic reticulum-gateway of the secretory pathway. Plant Cell 11, 615628.
Voinnet, O. (2001). RNA silencing as a plant immune system against viruses. Trends Genet 17, 449459.[CrossRef][Medline]
Voinnet, O., Lederer, C. & Baulcombe, D. C. (2000). A viral movement protein prevents spread of the gene silencing signal in Nicotiana benthamiana. Cell 103, 157167.[Medline]
von Bargen, S., Salchert, K., Paape, M., Piechulla, B. & Kellmann, J.-W. (2001). Interactions between the tomato spotted wilt virus movement protein and plant proteins showing homologies to myosin, kinesin and DNAJ-like chaperones. Plant Physiol Biochem 39, 10831093.[CrossRef]
Waterhouse, P. M., Wang, M. B. & Lough, T. (2001). Gene silencing as an adaptive defence against viruses. Nature 411, 834842.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wong, S. M., Lee, K. C., Yu, H. H. & Leong, W. F. (1998). Phylogenetic analysis of triple gene block viruses based on the TGB 1 homolog gene indicates a convergent evolution. Virus Genes 16, 295302.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wung, C. H., Hsu, Y. H., Liou, D. Y., Huang, W. C., Lin, N. S. & Chang, B. Y. (1999). Identification of the RNA-binding sites of the triple gene block protein 1 of bamboo mosaic potexvirus. J Gen Virol 80, 11191126.[Abstract]
Yang, Y., Ding, B., Baulcombe, D. C. & Verchot, J. (2000). Cell-to-cell movement of the 25K protein of potato virus X is regulated by three other viral proteins. Mol PlantMicrobe Interact 13, 599605.[Medline]
Yelina, N. E., Savenkov, E. I., Solovyev, A. G., Morozov, S. Yu. & Valkonen, J. P. T. (2002). Long-distance movement, virulence, and RNA silencing suppression controlled by a single protein in hordei- and potyviruses: complementary functions between virus families. J Virol 76, 1298112991.
Zamyatnin, A. A., Jr, Solovyev, A. G., Sablina, A. A. & 7 other authors (2002). Dual-colour imaging of membrane protein targeting directed by poa semilatent virus movement protein TGBp3 in plant and mammalian cells. J Gen Virol 83, 651662.
Zamyatnin, A. A., Jr, Solovyev, A. G., Savenkov, E. I., Morozov, S. Yu. & Valkonen, J. P. T. (2003). Intracellular trafficking of the proteins encoded by the triple gene block of Potato mop-top virus. VIIIth International Congress of Plant Pathology. (Christchurch, New Zealand, 27 February, 2003).
Zhou, H. & Jackson, A. O. (1996). Expression of the barley stripe mosaic virus RNA triple gene block. Virology 216, 367379.[CrossRef][Medline]