Induction of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-specific CTL in rhesus macaques by vaccination with modified vaccinia virus Ankara expressing SIV transgenes: influence of pre-existing anti-vector immunity

Sally Sharpe1, Natasha Polyanskaya1, Mike Dennis1, Gerd Sutter2, Tomás Hanke3, Volker Erfle2, Vanessa Hirsch4 and Martin Cranage1

Centre for Applied Microbiology and Research (CAMR), Salisbury SP4 0JG, UK1
Institut für Molekulare Virologie, GSF-Forschungszentrum für Umwelt und Gesundheit GmbH, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 München-Neuherberg, Germany2
MRC Human Immunology Unit, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK3
Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Rockville, MD 20852, USA4

Author for correspondence: Sally Sharpe. Fax +44 1980 611310. e-mail sally.sharpe{at}camr.org.uk


   Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
A major aim in AIDS vaccine development is the definition of strategies to stimulate strong and durable cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses. Here we report that simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-specific CTL developed in 4/4 macaques following a single intramuscular injection of modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) constructs expressing both structural and regulatory/accessory genes of SIV. In two animals Nef-specific responses persisted, but other responses diminished and new responses were not revealed, following further vaccination. Vaccination of another two macaques, expressing Mamu A*01 MHC class I, with MVA constructs containing nef and gag–pol under the control of the moderate strength natural vaccinia virus early/late promoter P7.5, again induced an early Nef-specific response, whereas responses to Gag remained undetectable. Anti-vector immunity induced by this immunization was shown to prevent the efficient stimulation of CTL directed to the cognate Gag epitope, p11C C-M, following vaccination with another MVA construct expressing SIV Gag–Pol under a strong synthetic vaccinia virus-specific promoter. In contrast, vaccination of a previously unexposed animal resulted in a SIV-specific CTL response widely disseminated in lymphoid tissues including lymph nodes associated with the rectal and genital routes of SIV entry. Thus, despite the highly attenuated nature of MVA, repeated immunization may elicit sufficient anti-vector immunity to limit the effectiveness of later vaccination.


   Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
In the face of the continued advance of the pandemic of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), a safe effective vaccine remains the best prospect for control. The increasing body of evidence suggesting that cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) play a central role in controlling viraemia (reviewed by Goulder et al., 1999 ) has led to a wide acceptance that an effective HIV vaccine should stimulate the generation of this cell population (Letvin, 1998 ).

Vaccination of macaques with live attenuated simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) confers a high degree of protection against subsequent challenge. Notably, this experimental approach stimulates CTL responses directed against many virus-encoded proteins and elicits protection against both systemic and mucosal challenge (reviewed by Ruprecht, 1999 ). Thus, in designing clinically acceptable strategies for the delivery of HIV/SIV immunogens, a primary aim is to evaluate the ability of candidate vaccines to induce broad, persistent and disseminated responses that emulate those induced by live attenuated virus.

Immunization with viral vectors, particularly recombinant vaccinia viruses, has been shown to efficiently prime and stimulate CTL responses (Bennink et al., 1984 ; Wiktor et al., 1984 ). Vectors of this type are among the most potent for inducing protective immunity in animals against viral infections and cancer (Moss, 1991 ; Paoletti, 1996 ). Indeed, the protective potential of vaccinia virus constructs expressing SIV genes has been demonstrated in the macaque model (Gallimore et al., 1995 ; Hu et al., 1992 ). The potential virulence of replication competent vaccinia virus in immunocompromised individuals, however, limits its potential for use in HIV endemic areas. In contrast, a highly attenuated vaccinia virus strain, modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA), has been shown to be avirulent in immunosuppressed animals and most importantly to be safe with no adverse side-effects when used in over 120000 humans at the end of the smallpox eradication campaign (Mayr et al., 1975 ). Although MVA grows well on primary chicken embryo fibroblasts (CEF), it is incapable of producing mature virions in most mammalian cells due to a block at the stage of virion formation (Meyer et al., 1991 ; Sutter & Moss, 1992 ). The resulting abortive infection does, however, result in DNA replication and the synthesis of both late and early proteins leading to recombinant protein expression at a level equivalent to that of a fully replication competent vaccinia virus (Sutter & Moss, 1992 ).

The protective potential of recombinant MVA-based vaccines against SIV has been shown in macaques where immunization with MVA expressing SIV structural genes followed by immunization with inactivated whole virus led to a reduction in virus replication after challenge with SIV (Hirsch et al., 1996 ).

As part of a European Concerted Action to determine the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of MVA constructs expressing both regulatory/accessory and structural genes of SIVmac 32H (Rud et al., 1994 ), we determined CTL responses in vaccinated macaques. Systemic SIV-specific CTL responses were measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) following mitogen-driven expansion of precursors. In addition, in two Mamu A*01 MHC class I-positive macaques, CTL responses against the cognate gag-encoded p11C C-M epitope (Allen et al., 1998 ) were determined following peptide-driven expansion of precursors. Failure to detect such responses following initial immunization with the MVA gagpol construct afforded the opportunity to compare, using a second, efficiently expressing construct, the stimulation of Gag-specific CTL responses, both systemically and locally in animals previously exposed to the MVA vector with responses generated in the absence of pre-existing anti-vector immunity.


   Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
{blacksquare} Animals.
Juvenile rhesus macaques used in this study were bred within the United Kingdom and housed according to the Home Office Code of Practice. Animals were anaesthetized by intramuscular injection with ketamine hydrochloride (Vetalar, Park Davis) for all procedures requiring removal from their cages, including femoral venepuncture and immunization.

Animals with the Mamu A*01 tissue type were selected for this study either by screening by cytotoxicity assay as previously described by Vogel et al. (1995) , or by sequence-specific primer (SSP)-PCR and direct sequencing as previously described by Knapp et al. (1997) .

{blacksquare} Recombinant MVA constructs and immunization.
The first set of recombinant MVA constructs was engineered to express the tat, rev, nef, gag–pol and env genes of SIVmac251 32H (pJ5) (Rud et al., 1994 ) under the transcriptional control of the natural vaccinia virus early/late promoter P7.5 (tat,rev, nef, gag–pol) or the strong synthetic vaccinia virus early/late promoter (env) (Chakrabarti et al., 1997 ). Briefly, the tat, rev, nef and gag–pol SIV coding sequences were placed into the unique SmaI site of the MVA vector plasmid pUCII-LZ-P7.5 which targets the site of deletion II within the MVA genome for insertion of recombinant genes (Sutter et al., 1995 ). The SIV env gene was inserted at the site of deletion III within the HindIII A-fragment of the MVA genome. Recombinant MVA were generated in CEF after transfection of the plasmid vectors, simultaneous infection with non-recombinant MVA, and screening for co-expression of the E. coli lacZ marker gene as described previously (Sutter & Moss, 1992 ). SIV transgene expression was determined by Western blot analysis for Env, Gag, Nef and Rev and the production of SIV Tat was detected by transcriptional activation. Gag–Pol expression was confirmed by detection of reverse transcriptase activity and electron microscopy for virus-like particles in tissue culture supernatants (G. Sutter & V. Erfle, unpublished data). MVA-SIVmacJ5 gag–pol vaccine stock was produced after large-scale virus amplification on CEF and provided through Programme EVA, Centralised Facility for AIDS Reagents, NIBSC, Herts UK.

A second MVA vector vaccine was based on a recombinant virus expressing the SIVsmH4 gag–pol coding sequences (nucleotides 1049–5397) regulated by the strong synthetic vaccinia virus early/late promoter (Chakrabarti et al., 1997 ) and was generated as described previously (Seth et al., 1998 ).

Monkeys were immunized by injection into different sites within the gluteal muscle on each occasion with 108 infectious units of each recombinant MVA in 500 µl sterile PBS. In the first experiment, four macaques were immunized at weeks 0, 12 and 24 with MVA constructs encoding SIVmacJ5 genes and a further four animals were similarly vaccinated with non-recombinant MVA (MVA-WT). In the second experiment, two macaques were immunized with MVA-SIVmacJ5 gag–pol and MVA-SIVmacJ5 nef at weeks 0, 12 and 24 followed by immunization with SIVsmH4 gag–pol at weeks 51 and 60.

{blacksquare} Preparation of mononuclear cell (MNC) suspensions from blood and tissues.
PBMC were isolated by Ficoll-Paque (Pharmacia) density centrifugation from heparinized blood and washed in medium consisting of RPMI 1640 supplemented with L-glutamine (2 mM), penicillin (50 U/ml)-streptomycin (50 µg/ml) and 10% heat-inactivated foetal bovine serum. Splenic MNC and lymph node MNC were obtained by teasing these tissues and washing cells in culture medium. Splenic MNC were purified on Ficoll-Paque cushions. Jejunal intraepithelial lymphocytes (IEL) and lamina propria lymphocytes (LPL) were obtained by mechanical and enzymatic dissociation using previously described methods (Polyanskaya et al., 2001 ). More than 95% of the cells obtained from the gut were viable as determined by trypan blue exclusion. Recovered cells were subsequently cultured in medium as above supplemented with 80 µg/ml gentamicin, 25 mM HEPES buffer, 0·5 µg/ml amphotericin B, 0·05 mM 2-mercaptoethanol and 5 IU/ml human recombinant interleukin 2 (IL-2, MRC AIDS Reagent Project, ADP901).

{blacksquare} Cytotoxic T cell analysis, bulk culture and chromium release assay.
To analyse Tat-, Rev-, Nef-, Gag- and Env-specific CTL activity, isolated PBMC at 2x106 cells/ml were incubated in culture medium containing concanavalin A at 10 µg/ml (Sigma). On day 3, Lymphocult T (Biotest) was added to a final concentration of 10 IU/ml. Cytolytic analysis was carried out at day 7 using a standard chromium release assay. Effector cells were washed three times and tested in triplicate against chromium-labelled target cells. Autologous, herpesvirus papio-transformed B-lymphoblastoid cell lines (B-LCL) were used as targets following overnight infection with recombinant vaccinia virus expressing SIVmacJ5 Tat (vv9015), Rev (vv9005), Nef (vv9011), Gag–Pol (vv9019) and Env (vv9002) (MRC AIDS Reagent Project) or influenza virus nucleoprotein PB2 (a kind gift from F. Gotch, London, UK) at 5 p.f.u. per cell. Infected B-LCL targets were labelled with 150 µCi 51Cr (Amersham) for 2 h, washed three times and 5000 cells added to each test well. Vaccinia virus-specific CTL activity was reduced with cold target competition by the addition of 50000 cells per well infected with recombinant vaccinia virus expressing SIVmacJ5 Vif (vv9003, MRC AIDS Reagent Project).

To assess Gag-specific CTL activity in Mamu A*01+ animals, isolated MNC were cultured at 4x106 cells/ml in medium containing Gag p11C C-M peptide (CTPYDINQM) (Miller et al., 1991 ; Allen et al., 1998 ) at 20 µg/ml. Lymphocult T was added to a final concentration of 10 IU/ml on days 3 and 7. CTL were restimulated in vitro on day 7 by the addition of mitomycin C (25 µg/ml, 1 h)-inactivated, peptide-pulsed B-LCL at a ratio of 10 stimulator:1 effector cell. At day 13, effector cells were assessed for their ability to lyse Gag peptide-pulsed or untreated target cells at various effector to target ratios (E:T) in a standard chromium release assay.

Chromium release was determined in supernatants harvested after 4 h. Spontaneous release and total release from target cells were determined from wells containing target cells and medium alone or with 5% Triton X-100. The percent specific lysis was determined from the equation: % specific lysis=[(experimental release-spontaneous release)/(maximum release-spontaneous release)]x100. Spontaneous release was always <20% of maximum release. Responses were considered positive if they were at least 10% specific lysis above that obtained from control target cells.

{blacksquare} Tetrameric MHC-peptide staining.
Mamu A*01-Gag p11C C-M peptide tetrameric complexes were prepared as described previously (Hanke et al., 1999 ). PBMC from vaccinated macaques and from an SIV-infected macaque (positive control) were incubated with 1 µg of PE-conjugated tetramer for 20 min at 4 °C followed by 5 min on ice. Labelled anti-human CD8 antibody (Caltag) was added and incubated on ice for a further 20 min. After washing, cells were fixed in PBS containing 1% paraformaldehyde and 2·5% foetal bovine serum and stained cells were enumerated by flow cytometry as described previously (Hanke et al., 1999 ).

{blacksquare} Assay of anti-vector antibodies.
Anti-vaccinia serum antibody responses were measured by ELISA with a vaccinia ELISA antigen (Churchill Applied Biotechnology) using standard methods. Bound antibody was detected using rabbit anti-monkey IgG-HRP conjugate (Sigma). Neutralizing antibodies were determined by plaque reduction using standard methods. Titres were calculated as the serum dilution resulting in a 50% reduction in plaque numbers.


   Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
SIV-specific CTL responses following immunization with MVA-SIVmacJ5 constructs
Initially, eight rhesus macaques were immunized with MVA. Four received 1x108 infectious units of each MVA construct containing SIV genes, by intramuscular inoculation at weeks 0, 12 and 24. Another four animals were similarly vaccinated with MVA-WT. All animals immunized with MVA-SIV had SIV-specific CTL detectable 4 to 8 weeks after the first immunization (Fig. 1), whereas responses were not detected in the four animals immunized with MVA-WT. In general, the strongest responses were seen against Nef, to which all four MVA-SIV vaccinates responded, whilst responses to Rev and Tat were detected in two animals (V73 and V42). Further vaccination failed to reveal CTL to other SIV antigens and in animals V73 and V42 did not boost Nef reactivity. After three immunizations only animals V66 and V13 had detectable SIV-specific CTL. Not all specificities could be assayed for on each occasion due either to limited cell recovery from blood or, in the case of animal V13, to lack of sufficient autologous target cells. Nonetheless, these results showed that a single vaccination with MVA-SIV was sufficient to generate SIV-specific CTL and suggested that boosting was not efficient.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Longitudinal analysis of SIV-specific CTL responses in four macaques induced by intramuscular immunization with MVA-SIVmacJ5 constructs. Responses were measured 4–8 weeks after the first immunization, 2 weeks after the second immunization and 2–6 weeks after the third immunization following mitogen-driven expansion of PBMC in vitro. Percent specific release of 51Cr is shown for a range of effector to target ratios (E:T) on autologous B-LCL infected with recombinant vaccinia viruses expressing SIVmacJ5 gene products ({bigtriangledown}, Rev; {lozenge}, Tat; {triangleup}, Nef; {circ}, Env; {square}, Gag–Pol) or influenza virus PB2 ({bullet}). NT, not tested.

 
The generation of CTL was then studied in more detail in a further two macaques, 65T and 68T, with a view to examining both systemic and local responses. These animals were chosen since they had the Mamu A*01 MHC class I phenotype that restricts a well described SIV Gag CTL epitope, thus enabling efficient peptide-specific restimulation of CTL precursors and precise determination of effector activity. The two animals were vaccinated as described above with MVA-SIVmacJ5 gag–pol and MVA-SIVmacJ5 nef. The latter construct was included as this appeared to be the most immunogenic and anti-Nef CTL responses have previously been associated with protection (Gallimore et al., 1995 ). Both animals had Nef-specific CTL activity at 2 weeks after the first immunization but this activity declined subsequently despite further immunization (Fig. 2). The specificity of the response was confirmed by the demonstration that cytolytic activity was restricted to autologous target cells.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Longitudinal analysis of Nef-specific CTL responses following intramuscular immunization of two macaques with MVA-SIVmacJ5 nef and MVA-SIVmacJ5 gag–pol constructs. Panels show results following each immunization; week refers to time after the first immunization and numbers in parentheses show weeks after the previous immunization. PBMC were expanded with mitogen in vitro. CTL activity is shown against autologous B-LCL targets infected with recombinant vaccinia virus expressing SIVmacJ5 nef ({circ}) or influenza virus PB2 ({bullet}). MHC restriction of Nef-specific killing was determined at week 4 by additional incubation of effector cells with heterologous targets infected with recombinant vaccinia virus expressing SIVmacJ5 nef ({square}) or influenza virus PB2 ({blacksquare}).

 
Surprisingly, stimulation of isolated PBMC in vitro with the Gag p11C C-M peptide failed to reveal Gag-specific CTL on any occasion (see Fig. 4). Staining of unstimulated PBMC, taken 2 weeks after the second and 2 weeks after the third immunizations, with Mamu A*01-p11C, C-M peptide tetrameric complexes also failed to reveal SIV-specific T cells in the CD8+ fraction, confirming the result obtained in the lytic assay.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. SIV Gag-specific CTL responses induced in systemic and locally associated lymphoid tissues following immunization with MVA-SIVsmH4 gag–pol (). Animals 65T and 68T were first immunized three times () with MVA constructs containing SIVmacJ5 nef and gag–pol. Gag-specific CTL activity was determined after restimulation in vitro with the Gag P11C C-M peptide and is shown for an E:T of 100:1. Left-hand panels show longitudinal activity in the peripheral circulation (PBMC). Right-hand panels show results in PBMC, spleen, axillary (Ax), inguinal (Ing), mesenteric (Mes) and iliac lymph nodes taken post-mortem at the time corresponding to the last data point shown in the left-hand panels.

 
Gag expression from the MVA SIVmacJ5 gag–pol construct
Taken together, the results obtained thus far suggested that the MVA SIVmacJ5 gag–pol construct was poorly immunogenic. Further investigation revealed that, whilst the original seed stock of virus efficiently produced Gag-derived virus-like particles following in vitro infection of cells (data not shown), large scale expansion of the vaccine stock for multi-centre vaccination experiments had resulted in reduced recombinant gene expression. Electron microscopy of cells infected at high multiplicity showed that only occasional cells had evidence of Gag expression revealed by particle formation and the characteristic accumulation of electron-dense material at the cell membrane (data not shown). Western blotting of infected cell lysates confirmed the synthesis of Gag protein, but only at a relatively low level (data not shown).

Anti-vector antibody responses following immunization with MVA-SIVmacJ5 constructs
Vaccinia virus (vector)-specific antibody responses were determined by ELISA at intervals throughout the immunization schedule. All animals made persistent humoral responses to the vaccinia virus vector throughout the immunization schedule. Notably, responses were induced by the initial vaccination and were boosted following the second vaccination but only poorly after the third (Fig. 3). Neutralizing antibody responses were weak and transient. In animals immunized with all of the MVA-SIVmacJ5 constructs, neutralizing antibodies were detected only after the second immunization (titres 19–46). By the time of the third vaccination, titres had dropped below the limit of detection. Similarly, following the third vaccination, a weak response (titres 18–24) was generated, declining rapidly (titres 4–9 by 4 weeks later). In animals 65T and 68T, similar low titres were detected (11 and 5 respectively, 9 weeks after the third immunization with nef and gag–pol constructs).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Longitudinal analysis of antibody responses to the MVA vector following immunization with MVA constructs at the times indicated by the arrowheads. Responses are shown for animals immunized with five constructs on each occasion ({circ}, V42; {bigtriangledown}, V73; {square}, V13; {lozenge}, V66) and for animals immunized with two constructs ({bullet}, 65T; {blacktriangledown}, 68T).

 
Induction of Gag-specific CTL in the presence of an anti-vector immune response
As described, immunization left both 65T and 68T with antibody responses specific for the MVA vector, but unresponsive with respect to detectable CTL directed against the Gag target antigen. Therefore, it was considered inappropriate to proceed at this stage to the analysis of local CTL immunity; however, these circumstances provided the opportunity to investigate the stimulation of CTL responses specific for the transgene in the face of anti-vector immunity. Hence, the animals were further immunized with a second construct; MVA-SIVsmH4 gag–pol, which had previously been shown to efficiently induce Gag epitope p11C C-M-specific CTL activity in naive Mamu A*01 rhesus macaques (Seth et al., 1998 ).

Twenty-seven and 36 weeks after the last immunization with the MVA-SIVmacJ5 constructs animals 65T and 68T were immunized intramuscularly with 108 p.f.u. MVA-SIVsmH4 gag–pol. A third animal, X19, a naive Mamu A*01+ macaque, was included in this phase of the immunization schedule. PBMC from all three animals were assessed for CTL activity to the Mamu A*01-restricted Gag CTL epitope p11C C-M at regular intervals following immunization with the MVA-SIVsmH4 gag–pol construct (Fig. 4). Now, Gag-specific CTL activity was revealed in all three animals; however, the pattern of response induced in the previously naive animal, X19, was different to that seen in the animals with the pre-existing anti-vector humoral response (65T and 68T). CTL activity was first detected in X19 6 weeks after the initial immunization and persisted until the second boost at week 9. In 65T, only a weak and transient response was detected whilst in 68T there was an immediate large transient response. Notably, following further immunization, a response was only seen in animal X19.

Locally associated Gag-specific CTL responses induced by immunization with MVA-SIVsmH4 gag–pol
Gag-specific CTL responses were investigated in MNC isolated from systemic and mucosally associated lymphoid compartments. Following expansion in vitro with Gag p11C C-M peptide, CTL responses were revealed in the previously naive animal X19, in a wide range of lymphoid tissues (Fig. 4). In contrast, weak responses, restricted to inguinal and iliac lymph nodes, were seen in one animal that possessed pre-existing anti-vector immunity at the time of MVA-SIVsmH4 immunization (65T) and were not detected in any of the tissues analysed from the other (68T). No direct lytic activity, in the absence of expansion in vitro, was detected with freshly isolated cells taken from tissues of vaccinated animals.

In addition to the tissues shown in Fig. 4, gag-specific CTL were sought also in intraepithelial and lamina propria lymphocytes derived from the gut of each animal. Intraepithelial lymphocytes were tested for direct CTL effector activity by chromium release assay immediately after isolation but none was detected, while lamina propria lymphocytes failed to survive the culture period in vitro with Gag p11C C-M peptide.


   Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Studies from several laboratories suggest that highly attenuated recombinant poxvirus vectors based on vaccinia virus may induce a degree of protective immunity in macaques against challenge with SIV. Hirsch et al. (1996) showed that virus loads were reduced following systemic challenge of macaques that had been vaccinated with MVA expressing SIV Env and Gag–Pol and boosted with inactivated virus. Another study using the vaccinia virus vector NYVAC expressing SIV structural genes has also given promising results and interestingly a high degree of protective efficacy was seen against rectal mucosal challenge with SIV despite the parenteral route of vaccination (Benson et al., 1998 ). However, the correlates of protection in these studies were incompletely defined. Recently, immunization with MVA alone expressing SIV Gag–Pol and/or Env has been shown to suppress loads following challenge with pathogenic SIV (Ourmanov et al., 2000 ).

In the study described here we were particularly interested in the generation of SIV-specific CTL responses as there is increasing evidence that CTL may have protective efficacy. Indeed, whilst this study was in progress, Seth et al. (2000) reported that the magnitude of reduction in viraemia in macaques vaccinated with MVA expressing SIV Gag–Pol was predicted by the magnitude of the vaccine-elicited CTL response prior to SIV challenge. In our study we vaccinated macaques with MVA constructs expressing not only structural but also regulatory/accessory genes of SIV. Rev, Tat and Nef are known to be targets for CTL recognition and since they are expressed early in the virus replicative cycle CTL against them may clear virus-infected cells prior to the production of mature virions. We were encouraged that CTL responses to several SIV proteins were detected after only a single vaccination with MVA; however, in only two animals was an SIV-specific CTL response maintained after boosting, and then only to Nef. Furthermore, repeated immunization failed to reveal CTL responses to new specificities. The early detection of SIV-specific CTL is similar to the result reported by Seth et al., where 3/4 animals had CTL after a single vaccination; however, these workers found a significant boost of responses after the second immunization. Interestingly though, subsequent boosts had little or no effect (Seth et al., 1998 , 2000 ). Furthermore, in these studies, the animal unresponsive after a single immunization generated CTL after the second immunization. Our study differed in several ways. Firstly, because of the number of antigens used, we employed a non-specific expansion method to reveal CTL activity: a method known to be relatively inefficient compared to antigen-driven restimulation (Kent et al., 1994 ; Voss et al., 1995 ). It is likely that mitogen restimulation reveals early CTL responses, when there is a large expansion of antigen-specific CTL in vivo. The apparent disappearance of responses at later times is therefore unlikely to be absolute; rather, it is likely due to an inability to expand a low frequency precursor pool. Why Nef-specific CTL responses remained high in V66 and V13 is unknown but interestingly these two animals were resistant to infection following rectal challenge with SIVmac251 (unpublished). Secondly, we used a 5-fold higher dose of virus for each immunization. Thirdly, with the exception of the env construct, a weaker promoter than that used by Seth et al. was employed to drive transgene expression.

The failure to detect Gag-specific CTL in PBMC from two Mamu A*01+ vaccinates following peptide restimulation in vitro was surprising, especially so, as global restimulation with mitogen revealed MHC-restricted Nef-specific CTL. It is possible that immunization resulted in low numbers of Gag-specific CTL precursors that would be revealed only by more sensitive methods such as interferon-{gamma} ELISPOT or prolonged expansion with several rounds of antigenic stimulation (McMichael & O’Callaghan, 1998 ; Vogel et al., 1998 ). The poor immunogenicity of the MVA SIVmacJ5 gag–pol construct was most likely due to the reduced levels of gag–pol gene expression found upon in vitro analysis of the large-scale expanded vaccine preparations.

Despite the restricted growth potential of MVA in vivo, anti-vaccinia virus antibodies were detected after a single immunization and were boosted subsequently upon further immunization. The antibody levels were, however, lower than those seen in a previous experiment in macaques using replication-competent vaccinia virus (Cranage et al., 1994 ). Here, titres of log10 3·1 were still detectable 35 weeks after intradermal administration of two doses of 107 p.f.u. of recombinant WR strain vaccinia virus given 13 weeks apart. Studies in mice (Rooney et al., 1988 ; Belyakov et al., 1999 ) and in man (Cooney et al., 1991 ) show that pre-existing anti-vaccinia virus immunity can have a detrimental effect on vaccine efficacy when using replication-competent vaccinia virus vectors. Our data indicate that immunity to the MVA vector had an influence on the SIV Gag-specific CTL response generated following the immunization with a high level expression construct, MVA SIVsmH4 gag–pol. The responses seen in the naive animal were similar to those reported in an earlier study with this MVA construct (Seth et al., 1998 ), with Gag-specific CTL detected 6 weeks after immunization. The disappearance of responsiveness 10 days after the second boost is puzzling; however, responses subsequently recovered. This transient loss of an in vitro expandable response may be associated with vaccine-induced expansion in vivo of precursor CTL that can be detected by tetramer staining (Hanke et al., 1999 ; Seth et al., 1998 ). The rapid, high response detected in 68T suggests that this animal had been primed by the exposure to MVA-SIVmacJ5.

In murine studies, Belyakov et al. (1999) showed that pre-immunization with the WR strain of recombinant vaccinia virus prevented the generation of a CTL response and reduced antibody titres to HIV-1 gp160 following immunization with an MVA construct expressing this antigen. Recently it was shown, also in mice, that MVA can be used as an immunizing agent under conditions of pre-existing immunity induced by MVA (Ramirez et al., 2000 ). Nevertheless, there was a considerable reduction in the number of interferon-{gamma}-secreting cells specific for the transgene induced in the presence of pre-existing immunity, albeit this reduction was less than that seen following prior immunization with vaccinia virus WR strain. These findings are consistent with those reported here in primates. Furthermore, the relatively large dose of MVA used in the present study may have favoured the generation of strong anti-vector immunity.

The mechanism by which pre-existing anti-vector immunity limits response to delivered antigens is not known and may involve both humoral and cellular immunity. Anti-vector antibody may reduce the take of vaccine doses through neutralization of the inoculum, although in the present study such responses were weak and short lived, or by promotion of clearance of factory sites through mechanisms such as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Likewise, an MVA-specific CTL response, not measured in the current study, may limit antigen production.

Although limited to observations in one animal, which had not previously been exposed to MVA, we were encouraged by the disseminated CTL response detected. The presence of CTL reactivity in cells from the iliac lymph nodes was of particular interest. These nodes drain the recto-genital tract and represent an important site of SIV dissemination following both vaginal (Miller et al., 1992 ; Spira et al., 1996 ) and rectal (Lehner et al., 1996 ) infection of rhesus macaques. Furthermore, immune responses elicited by targeting the iliac lymph nodes have been associated with protection against rectal mucosal challenge (Lehner et al., 1996 ). The failure to detect direct CTL activity in intra-epithelial lymphocytes, suggests that mucosal immunity per se was not stimulated by parenteral vaccination with MVA, although we cannot exclude the possibility that precursor CTL were present. This is in agreement with mouse data showing that systemic immunization with MVA failed to elicit mucosal immunity (Belyakov et al., 1998 ).

Overall, our results and those of others suggest that MVA stimulates both a circulating and disseminated CTL responses to SIV transgenes, but the efficiency of stimulating strong and persistent responses is critically dependent upon the level of anti-vector immunity generated and the efficiency of transgene expression from the vector. Further work is required to define optimal immunization protocols, including those using mixed vector or DNA priming steps that may focus the immune response away from the vector and onto the transgene.


   Acknowledgments
 
This work was funded by the UK Department of Health and EU Concerted Action PL-962771. We are grateful to Dr Harvey Holmes (AIDS Reagent Project, NIBSC, UK) for the provision of reagents; to Rachel Samuel for help with tetramer staining; to Dr llnour Ourmanov who prepared the MVA-SIVsm gag–pol construct; to Barry Dowsett for electron microscopy; to Dr Steve Norley and Dr David Watkins for Mamu A*01 tissue typing; to John Lee for neutralization assays; to Nicola Cook, Linda Easterbrook and Sharon Leech for technical help; and to the staff of the Biological Investigation group for animal care.


   References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Allen, T. A., Sidney, J., del Guercio, M.-F., Glickman, R. L., Lensmayer, G. L., Wiebe, D. A., DeMars, R., Pauza, C. D., Johnson, R. P., Sette, A. & Watkins, D. I. (1998). Characterization of the peptide binding motif of a rhesus MHC class I molecule (Mamu-A*01) that binds an immunodominant CTL epitope from simian immunodeficiency virus. Journal of Immunology 160, 6062-6071.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Belyakov, I. M., Wyatt, L. S., Ahlers, J. D., Earl, P., Penleton, C. D., Kelsall, B. L., Strober, W., Moss, B. & Berzofsky, J. A. (1998). Induction of mucosal CTL response by intrarectal immunization with a replication-deficient recombinant vaccinia virus expressing HIV 89.6 envelope protein. Journal of Virology 72, 8264-8272.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Belyakov, I. M., Moss, B., Strober, W. & Berzofsky, J. A. (1999). Mucosal vaccination overcomes the barrier to recombinant vaccinia immunization caused by pre-existing poxvirus immunity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 96, 4512-4517.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bennink, J. R., Yewdell, J. W., Smith, G. L. & Moller, C. (1984). Recombinant vaccinia virus primes and stimulates influenza haemagglutinin-specific cytotoxic T cells. Nature 311, 578-579.[Medline]

Benson, J., Chougnet, C., Robert-Guroff, M., Montefiori, D., Markham, P., Shearer, G., Gallo, R. C., Cranage, M., Paoletti, E., Limbach, K., Venzon, D., Tartaglia, J. & Franchini, G. (1998). Recombinant vaccine-induced protection against the highly pathogenic simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac251: dependence on route of challenge exposure. Journal of Virology 72, 4170-4182.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chakrabarti, S., Sisler, J. R. & Moss, B. (1997). Compact, synthetic, vaccinia virus early/late promoter for protein expression. Biotechniques 23, 1094-1097.[Medline]

Cooney, E. L., Collier, A. C., Greenberg, P. D., Coombs, R. W., Zarling, J., Arditti, D. E., Hoffman, M. C., Hu, S.-L. & Corey, L. (1991). Safety of and immunological response to a recombinant vaccinia virus vaccine expressing HIV envelope glycoprotein. Lancet 337, 567-572.[Medline]

Cranage, M., Polyanskaya, N., Cook, N., Leech, S., Ashworth, T., Sharpe, S., Teng, X.-C., Dennis, M., Hall, G., Greenaway, P., Stott, J., Chan, L., Kent, K., Almond, N., Spitali, M., Rhodes, A., Hutchinson, G., Stephens, P., Mackett, M. & Rud, E. (1994). Immune responses to both cellular and viral proteins can mediate protection against infection with SIVmac. In Vaccines 94 , pp. 203-209. Edited by N. Norrby, F. Brown, R. M. Chanock & H. S. Ginsberg. Cold Spring Harbor, NY:Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.

Gallimore, A., Cranage, M., Cook, N., Almond, N., Bootman, J., Rud, E., Silvera, P., Dennis, M., Corcoran, T., Stott, J., McMichael, A. & Gotch, F. (1995). Early suppression of SIV replication by CD8+ nef-specific cytotoxic T cells in vaccinated macaques. Nature Medicine 1, 1167-1173.[Medline]

Goulder, J. R., Rowland-Jones, S. L., McMichael, A. J. & Walker, B. D. (1999). Anti-HIV cellular immunity: recent advances towards vaccine design. AIDS 13, 121-136.

Hanke, T., Samuel, R. V., Blanchard, T. J., Neumann, V. C., Allen, T. M., Boyson, J. E., Sharpe, S. A., Cook, N., Smith, G. L., Watkins, D. I., Cranage, M. P. & McMichael, A. J. (1999). Effective induction of simian immunodeficiency virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes in macaques by using a multiepitope gene and DNA prime-modified vaccinia virus Ankara boost vaccination regimen. Journal of Virology 73, 7524-7532.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hirsch, V. M., Fuerst, T. R., Sutter, G., Carroll, M. W., Yang, L. C., Goldstein, S., Piatak, M.Jr, Elkins, W. R., Alvord, W. G., Montefiori, D. C., Moss, B. & Lifson, J. D. (1996). Patterns of virus replication correlate with outcome in simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-infected macaques: effect of prior immunization with a trivalent SIV vaccine in modified vaccinia Ankara. Journal of Virology 70, 3741-3752.[Abstract]

Hu, S.-L., Abrams, K., Barber, G. N., Moran, P., Zarling, J. M., Langlois, A. J., Kuller, L.-R., Morton, W. R. & Benveniste, R. E. (1992). Protection of macaques against SIV infection by subunit vaccines of SIV envelope glycoprotein gp160. Science 255, 456-459.[Medline]

Kent, S. J., Stallard, V., Corey, L., Hu, S.-L., Morton, W. R., Gritz, L., Panicali, D. L. & Greenberg, P. D. (1994). Analysis of cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses to SIV proteins in SIV-infected macaques using antigen-specific stimulation with recombinant vaccinia and fowl poxvirus. AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses 10, 551-560.[Medline]

Knapp, L. A., Lehman, E., Piekarczyk, M. S., Urvter, J. A. & Watkins, D. I. (1997). A high frequency of Mamu-A*01 in the rhesus macaque detected by PCR-SSP and direct sequencing. Tissue Antigens 50, 657-661.[Medline]

Lehner, T., Wang, Y., Cranage, M., Bergmeier, L. A., Mitchell, E., Tao, L., Hall, G., Dennis, M., Cook, N., Brookes, R., Klavinskis, L., Jones, I., Doyle, C. & Ward, R. (1996). Protective mucosal immunity elicited by targeted iliac lymph node immunization with a subunit SIV envelope and core vaccine in macaques. Nature Medicine 2, 767-775.[Medline]

Letvin, N. L. (1998). Progress in the development of an HIV-1 vaccine. Science 280, 1875-1880.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

McMichael, A. J. & O’Callaghan, C. A. (1998). A new look at T cells. Journal of Experimental Medicine 187, 1367-1371.[Free Full Text]

Mayr, A., Hochstein-Mintzel, V. & Stickl, H. (1975). Abstammung Eigenschaften und Verwendug des attenuierten Vaccinia-Stammes MVA. Infection 105, 6-14.

Meyer, H., Sutter, G. & Mayr, A. (1991). Mapping of deletions in the genome of the highly attenuated vaccinia virus MVA and their influence on virulence. Journal of General Virology 72, 1031-1038.[Abstract]

Miller, M. D., Yamamoto, H., Hughes, A. L., Watkins, D. I. & Letvin, N. L. (1991). Definition of an epitope and MHC class I molecule recognized Gag-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes in SIVmac-infected rhesus monkeys. Journal of Immunology 147, 320-329.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Miller, C., Alexander, N. J., Vogel, P., Anderson, J. & Marx, P. A. (1992). Mechanism of genital transmission of SIV: a hypothesis based on transmission studies and the location of SIV in the genital tract of chronically infected female rhesus macaques. Journal of Medical Primatology 21, 64-68.[Medline]

Moss, B. (1991). Vaccinia virus: a tool for research and vaccine development. Science 252, 1662-1667.[Medline]

Ourmanov, I., Brown, C. R., Moss, B., Carroll, M., Wyatt, L., Pletneva, L., Goldstein, S., Venzon, D. & Hirsch, V. M. (2000). Comparative efficacy of recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara expressing simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) gag–pol and/or env in macaques challenged with pathogenic SIV. Journal of Virology 74, 2740-2751.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Paoletti, E. (1996). Applications of poxvirus vectors to vaccination: an update. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 93, 11349-11353.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Polyanskaya, N., Bergmeier, L. A., Sharpe, S. A., Cook, N., Leech, S., Hall, G., Dennis, M., ten Haaft, P., Heeney, J., Manca, F., Lehner, T. & Cranage, M. P. (2001). Mucosal exposure to subinfectious doses of SIV primes gut-associated antibody secreting cells and T cells: lack of enhancement by nonneutralizing antibody. Virology 279, 527-538.[Medline]

Ramirez, J. C., Gherardi, M. M., Rogriguez, D. & Estaban, M. (2000). Attenuated modified vaccinia virus Ankara can be used as an immunizing agent under conditions of preexisting immunity to the vector. Journal of Virology 74, 7651-7655.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rooney, J. F., Wohlenberg, C., Cremer, K. J., Moss, B. & Notkins, A. L. (1988). Immunisation with a vaccinia virus recombinant expressing herpes simplex virus type 1 glycoprotein D: long-term protection and vaccine effect of vaccination. Journal of Virology 62, 1530-1534.[Medline]

Rud, E. W., Cranage, M., Yon, J., Quirk, J., Ogilvie, L., Cook, N., Webster, S., Dennis, M. & Clarke, B. E. (1994). Molecular and biological characterization of simian immunodeficiency virus macaque strain 32H proviral clones containing nef size variants. Journal of General Virology 75, 529-543.[Abstract]

Ruprecht, R. M. (1999). Live attenuated AIDS viruses as vaccines: promise or peril? Immunological Reviews 170, 135-149.[Medline]

Seth, A., Ourmanov, I., Kuroda, M. J., Schmitz, J. E., Carroll, M. W., Wyatt, L. S., Moss, B., Forman, M. A., Hirsch, V. M. & Letvin, N. L. (1998). Recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara-simian immunodeficiency virus gag–pol elicits cytotoxic T lymphocytes in rhesus monkeys detected by a major histocompatibility complex class I/peptide tetramer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 95, 10112-10116.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Seth, A., Ourmanov, I., Schmitz, J. E., Kuroda, M. J., Lifton, M. A., Nickerson, C. E., Wyatt, L., Carroll, M., Moss, B., Venzon, D., Letvin, N. L. & Hirsch, V. M. (2000). Immunization with a modified vaccinia virus expressing simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) gag–pol primes for an anamnestic Gag-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte response and is associated with reduction of viremia after SIV challenge. Journal of Virology 74, 2502-2509.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Spira, A. L., Marx, P. A., Patterson, B. K., Mahoney, J., Koup, R. A., Wolinsky, S. M. & Ho, D. D. (1996). Cellular targets of infection and route of viral dissemination after an intravaginal inoculation of simian immunodeficiency virus into rhesus macaques. Journal of Experimental Medicine 183, 215-225.[Abstract]

Sutter, G. & Moss, B. (1992). Non-replicating vaccinia vector efficiently expresses recombinant genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 89, 10847-10851.[Abstract]

Sutter, G., Ohlmann, M. & Erfle, V. (1995). Non-replicating vaccinia vector efficiently expresses bacteriophage T7 R polymerase. FEBS Letters 371, 9-12.[Medline]

Vogel, T., Norley, S., Beer, B. & Kurth, R. (1995). Rapid screening for Mamu A*01 positive rhesus macaques using a SIVmac Gag peptide-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte assay. Immunology 84, 482-487.[Medline]

Vogel, T. U., Fournier, J., Sherring, A., Ko, D., Parenteau, M., Bogdanovic, D., Mihowich, J. & Rud, E. W. (1998). Presence of circulating CTL induced by infection with wild-type or attenuated SIV and their correlation with protection from pathogenic SHIV challenge. Journal of Medical Primatology 27, 65-72.[Medline]

Voss, G., Li, J., Manson, K., Wyand, M., Sodroski, J. & Letvin, N. L. (1995). Human Immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoprotein-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes in simian-human immunodeficiency virus-infected rhesus monkeys. Virology 208, 770-775.[Medline]

Wiktor, T. J., MacFarlan, R. I., Reagan, K. J., Dietzschold, B., Curtis, P. J., Wunner, W. H., Kieny, M.-P., Lathe, R., Lecocq, J.-P., Mackett, M., Moss, B. & Koprowski, H. (1984). Protection from rabies by a vaccinia virus containing the rabies virus glycoprotein gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 81, 7194-7198.[Abstract]

Received 9 February 2001; accepted 15 May 2001.