Correspondence to Paul Isenring: paul.isenring{at}crhdq.ulaval.ca
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
NKCC2 belongs to the cation-Cl cotransporter (CCC) family, which is comprised of several isoforms that mediate cell surface Cl-dependent Na+ and/or K+ cotransport. Members within this family are very homologous to one another, possessing 12 transmembrane domains (tm) flanked by cytosolic termini (see model of NKCC2 in Fig. 1). Previous studies have revealed that a number of CCC isoforms also occur in splice variants (Payne and Forbush, 1994, Igarashi et al., 1995
; Race et al., 1999
; Plata et al., 2001
; Gagnon et al., 2002
; Hebert et al., 2004
). Among terrestrial vertebrates, e.g., at least four types of NKCC2s have been described: NKCC2F, A, and B, which are identical to one another except for a 96-bp exon that encodes the second tm and part of the following connecting segment, and NKCC2AF, which possesses both the A and F exons in tandem (Payne and Forbush, 1994
; Igarashi et al., 1995
; Plata et al., 2001
; Gagnon et al., 2002
).
|
In mammals, the NKCC2 splice variants differ not only in their distribution and expression levels, but also in their kinetic features (Gimenez et al., 2002; Plata et al., 2002
; Gagnon et al., 2003
). By way of illustration, F displays the lowest affinity for ions under controlled conditions and B the highest (Kms: F > A > B), whereas A displays the highest transport capacity and B the lowest (Vmax: for A
F > B); for convenience, Km values based on two of these studies are summarized in Table I. Regarding AF, intriguingly, influx studies in the Xenopus laevis oocyte expression system have shown that this variant is nonfunctional even if it is able to reach the cell surface (Gagnon et al., 2002
).
|
Coimmunoprecipitation and cross-linking studies have suggested that NKCC2 is organized at the surface of renal tubular cells as a homooligomer (Ichinose et al., 1999; Moore-Hoon and Turner, 2000
; Starremans et al., 2003
). The protein domains that lead to the formation of such structures have not been identified but recent two-hybrid mapping analyses using NKCC1 as a model revealed that the COOH terminus (Ct) could play an important role in this regard (Simard et al., 2004a
). The mechanisms by which monomers assemble with each other are of particular interest given that nonfunctional NKCCs have been shown to exert dominant-negative effects on their functional counterparts (Isenring et al., 1998b
; Jacoby et al., 1999
; Caron et al., 2000
; Casula et al., 2001
).
In this research, studies were performed to elucidate further the functional and structural properties of A, F, and AF. Based on our findings, we propose that the variants each play unique roles in the TAL not only because of differences in their localizations and kinetic features but also because of differences in the mechanisms by which their expression is regulated. We propose, in addition, that the inclusion of different types of NKCC2 variants in the same oligomer could endow AF with unexpectedly important tasks in salt transport along the TAL.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
NKCC Constructs/pGilda or pB42AD
These constructs were used for the two-hybrid studies. They consisted of NKCC-derived DNA fragments that were cloned in pGilda (CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc.), a vector that possesses coding sequences for the LexA DNA-binding domain and a His transformation marker (HisTM), or in pB42AD (CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc.), a vector that possesses coding sequences for the activating domain of a transcription factor, the HA epitope, and a TrpTM. The inserts were obtained by reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR using human kidney RNA and primers to which restriction sites were added, or they were generated by bp deletions from existing constructs after creating convenient restriction sites with the Quick Change Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene) when necessary (see Table II for primers). The constructs were termed according to the NKCC protein segments encoded, using prefixes to designate the specific domains from which the segments are derived (Nt, NH2 terminus; Ct, COOH terminus; 1, proximal portion; 2, distal portion) and numbers in parentheses to designate their position in human (hu) NKCC2. The characteristics of these protein segments are shown in Table III.
|
|
pB42AD Constructs
One of the interacting proteins identified during the screen is derived from a 777-bp fragment that encodes the huNKCC2 distal Ct; it was called Ct2NKCC2(8411099). Two other pB42AD-derived constructs, which were employed for the mapping analyses, consisted of Ct2NKCC2(8301099) and Ct2NKCC1(9701212). Here, the latter construct was also generated for a recently published study (Simard et al., 2004a), it would encode the protein fragment C2tNKCC2(8481099) in huNKCC2.
Shark (sa) NKCC2/Pol1 Constructs
Three such constructs (saNKCC2A, F, and AF) were used for influx and expression studies. They were already available from previously published work (Gagnon et al., 2002, 2003
). The vector in which they are cloned, Pol1, contains a T7 promoter, a cloning site flanked by the X. laevis ß-globin untranslated regions and a polyA tract. It should be noted here that the kinetic features of any given splice variant are very similar among various species such as mouse, rabbit, and shark (Gimenez et al., 2002
; Plata et al., 2002
; Gagnon et al., 2003
).
Yeast Two-hybrid Screen
EGY48 yeast (Y) were first transformed with the construct p8op-lacZ (CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc.) and seeded on Ura plates, generating the strain Yop; p8op-LacZ is a plasmid that contains LexA operators destined to interact with the pB42AD-derived activating domain, and that encodes two reporter genes (Leu and LacZ) controlled by LexA and Ura. After this first selection step, Yop cells were transformed a second time with the bait Ct1NKCC2(657836) and seeded on UraHis (UH) plates, generating YopCt1NKCC2(657836). The latter strain was subsequently tested for expression of the hybrid protein (see below and Fig. 2 A, lane 7), and tested for autonomous reporter gene activation on UraHisLeu + X-galactosidase (UHL+X) plates.
|
Two procedures were performed to confirm the specificity of the identified interactions. First, Yop cells were transformed with a single prey/pB42AD and tested for expression of a hybrid protein by Western blotting after selection of colonies on UraTrp (UT) plates (see below and examples in lanes 2, 4, and 5 of Fig. 2 B). Second, Yop cells were cotransformed with pairs of plasmids (single prey + empty pGilda versus single prey + LAM/pGilda) and tested for reporter gene activation on UHT+X plates. Note that LAM, which stands for human lamin C, has been reported not to form complexes or interact with most other proteins (Bartel et al., 1993).
Yeast Two-hybrid Mapping Analysis
These studies were performed to determine (a) whether the Ct1Ct2 interacting sites can be identified more precisely, (b) whether they are similar to those of NKCC1, and (c) whether Ct1Ct1, Ct2Ct2, or NtCt associations are also possible. To these ends, Yop cells were transformed with different types of NKCC-bearing constructs and tested for their ability to express a hybrid protein after selection on UH or UT plates (see examples in Fig. 2 A, lanes 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, and Fig. 2 B, lanes 3, 4, 6, and 7) and for reporter gene activation on UHT+X plates. After this step, the cells were retransformed with another NKCC-bearing construct and tested for their ability to grow on UHTL plates or to express ß-gal activity on UHT+X plates.
Expression of saNKCC2s in Oocytes
To obtain synthesis of saNKCC2s in this system, defolliculated stage VVI oocytes were injected with saNKCC2/Pol1-derived cRNA (220 ng/oocyte diluted in H2O) and maintained for 3 d at 18°C in Barth's (B) medium (see Table IV) + 125 µM furosemide. Groups of oocytes were also injected with H2O alone as controls (ctls).
|
Flux Studies in saNKCC2-expressing Oocytes
Furosemide was first removed through several rinses in a regular (R) medium (see Table IV). Eggs were then subjected to two consecutive incubation steps: one of 60 min in medium R + 84 mOsM sucrose (R-SUC) to activate the cotransporter, and another of 45 min in one of two solutions to measure NKCC-mediated accumulation of the isotope. The latter solutions were (a) medium R + 1 µCi/ml 86Rb+ ± 250 µM bumetanide + 10 µM ouabain (for 86Rb+ influxes) or (b) a modified medium R (R) (in which [Na+] was decreased to 43 mM) + 1 µCi/ml 22Na+ + 10 µM ouabain + 125 µM hydrochlorothiazide + 125 µM amiloride (for 22Na+ influxes). Fluxes were terminated with several washes in a high K+ medium + 250 µM bumetanide + the inhibitors used during the prior incubation, and oocytes were transferred afterwards to 96-well plates (one oocyte/well) prefilled with 2% SDS and scintillation fluid. 86Rb+ was detected with the TopCountNXT counter (Packard).
Experimental Animals
Male C3H mice (age: 200400 d, weight: 2530 g) were kept in the animal care facility of our Center. After a brief stabilization period, they were submitted for 7 d to one of three regimens: (1) a standard diet consisting of Teklad global 2018 mouse (ms) chow (5 g/day) and H2O (10 ml/day); (2) mouse chow (5 g/day) mixed with furosemide (5 mg/day), and H2O (10 ml/day); (3) mouse chow (5 g/day) and H2O (100 ml/day) supplemented with sucrose (600 mM). At the end of this 7-d period, all mice were killed by neck dislocation.
RNA Studies
Expression levels of A, F, and AF were first determined by RT-PCR. Templates consisted of first cDNA strands that were produced from oligodT-primed human kidney RNA (2 µg/reactions) while primers consisted of sequences that are derived from the 5' end of exon A or F (sense primers), from the 3' end of these exons (antisense primers), or from ß-actin. The exon-specific primers were used in three combinations to amplify exon A (sense A + antisense A), F (sense F + antisense F). or AF (sense A + antisense F), whereas the ß-actinspecific primers were used as ctls. PCR conditions were titrated to generate DNA strands over a linear range of amplification versus time using simple arithmetic plots. All samples were migrated on ethidium bromidestained agarose gels.
Expression levels of A, F, and AF were also determined by in situ hybridization. For these studies, freshly harvested mouse kidneys were frozen in liquid N and mounted on cryostat supports. From there, they were cut sagittally into 12-µm cryosections, applied directly on glass slides, and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min. The prehybridization and hybridization steps were performed in a Denhardt's-based solution for 2 and 16 h, respectively. RNA messages were probed with end-labeled oligonucleotides derived from exon 4 (Table II). The hybridization step was followed by several washes in SSC (2x, 1x, 0.5x) at a maximum of 37°C.
Western Analyses
They were performed with yeast protein extracts prepared in a special lysis solution (detailed in Fig. 2 legend) as previously described (Simard et al., 2004a). In brief, extracts were separated on SDS-polyacrylamide tricine gels and transferred by capillarity to Immobilon-P nylon blots (Millipore). Later on, the blots were incubated sequentially with a primary and secondary Ab, and proteins of interest were visualized by chemiluminescence (using the ECL kit, Amersham Biosciences).
Sequence Analyses, Quantification Methods, Statistics
DNA characterizations were performed by automated sequencing using plasmid-derived primers (Table II) and restriction analyses. For blast searches, sequence alignments, and structure predictions, we used a combination of programs including PLOT (B. Forbush) and DNAStar (Lasergene). Whole-cell extracts were quantified with the DC protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories) and DNA or RNA-specific signals by densitometry. When appropriate, statistical dispersion within datasets was determined by calculating SEMs, and differences between groups of variables were analyzed by Student's two-tail t tests, rejecting the null hypothesis for P > 0.05.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Detailed DNA analyses revealed that 13 of the colonies identified expressed Ct2NKCC2 protein segments, 8 of which also differed in amino acid sequence. These distinct prey are illustrated in Fig. 3 A by horizontal bars aligned with the region in huNKCC2 to which they correspond. It should be noted that all of the Ct2NKCC2 prey were characterized exhaustively in this work after noting that they tended to vary in length and could therefore be exploited for the mapping studies described below.
|
Two-hybrid Mapping Analyses: Interaction between Ct1NKCC2(657836) and the Distinct Preys
These analyses were performed to confirm the baitCt2NKCC2 associations identified during the initial two-hybrid screen and results are summarized in Fig. 4 A. As can be seen here, YopCt1NKCC2(657836) cells retransformed with either of the distinct prey uncovered, including the 190-residue NKCC protein segment Ct2NKCC2(9101099), are able to grow on UHTL plates (left) and generate strong ß-gal activity on UHT+X plates (right). For convenience, we have also illustrated these results graphically by reusing Fig. 3 A and showing the protein segments that have supported an interaction as black bars.
|
To determine which of these scenarios is the most likely, we analyzed the behaviors of yeast coexpressing the Ct1 domain of one isoform and the Ct2 domain of the other isoform, assuming that the oligomerization domains of NKCC1 and 2 would probably interact with each other if they are highly conserved. As shown in Fig. 4 B, the behaviors of the cotransformants suggest that the former scenario is in fact the correct one. For instance, all of the combinations tested support cell growth on UHTL plates (left) and generate strong ß-gal activity on UHT+X plates (right).
The bar in Fig. 3 C represents a summary of the mapping analyses that were conducted thus far for NKCC1 and 2, assuming that the EIRs of both isoforms are highly homologous. It shows where EIRs in huNKCC2 are now localized relative to those identified in huNKCC1 (Fig. 3 B). Based on this summary, EIR3 appears to be shorter than initially predicted but, reassuringly, the residues no longer included in this previously defined contact site are in reality poorly matched between NKCC1 and 2. EIR1, conversely, now appears to be at a different position, as suggested by the behaviors of Ct1NKCC2(657836), which was used for the two-hybrid screen in this research, and of Ct1NKCC1(834926), which had been used previously to identify EIR2 in huNKCC1. Indeed, Ct1NKCC2(657836) interacts with Ct2 but begins just after the previously defined EIR1, whereas Ct1NKCC1(834926) was not able to interact with Ct2NKCC1 but corresponds to the longest EIR2-containing protein segment tested to date.
Two-hybrid Mapping Analyses: Interaction between Other NKCC2s
The behaviors of various transformants that coexpress a truncated Ct1 or Ct2 with a full-length Ct2 and Ct1 are shown in Fig. 4 C (the protein segments are also illustrated graphically in Fig. 3 D). Here, interestingly, it is seen that the only truncated protein segment capable of supporting cell growth or inducing ß-gal activity is Ct2NKCC2(671836). When these new results are interpreted in relation with the combined analyses shown in Fig. 3 C, the previously defined EIR2 and EIR4 are now seen to be more precisely mapped and the localization of EIR1 remain slightly different from that predicted initially (see Fig. 3 E).
A number of putative binding sites or residues in huNKCC2 could account for the EIRs' properties or play complementary roles in the formation of Ct1Ct2 complexes; their localization relative to the newly defined EIRs is shown in Fig. 3 F. Interestingly, several of these sites/residues (highlighted by an asterisk) are conserved between NKCC1 and 2. As will be discussed later, however, the current analysis has placed a conserved, presumably important FHA-related site outside of one of the newly relocalized EIR.
Two-hybrid Mapping Analyses: a Search for Other Types of Self-interactions
The segments used for these studies, Nt2NKCC2(51179), Ct1NKCC2(657836), and Ct2NKCC2(8301099), are shown in Fig. 1. The only conclusion that could be drawn from the behavior of various cotransformants is that Ct1NKCC2 does not interact with Ct1NKCC2 (unpublished data). The coexpression of a bait Ct2NKCC2 with a prey Ct2NKCC2 yielded equivocal results, whereas Nt2NKCC2(51179) was found to induce LacZ in the absence of a prey protein and could therefore not be tested (unpublished data).
Flux Studies
Because A, F, and AF are identical in the region of huNKCC2 that harbors EIRs, and because AF is probably expressed in the same cell types as A or F, we hypothesized that some of the variants could assemble with each other in some regions of the TAL to form heterooligomeric structures in vivo. We have thus determined the potential repercussions of such assemblies by analyzing the functional behavior of A or F coexpressed in oocytes with AF.
The results of these studies are shown in Fig. 5. Quite interestingly, 86Rb fluxes in oocytes that express both A and AF together are 50% lower than in oocytes that express A alone, approaching those measured in H2O-injected ctls (Fig. 5 A). Similar results are observed when A is replaced by F in these coexpression experiments (Fig. 5 B) or when 86Rb is replaced by 22Na (Fig. 5 C). In conjunction with our previous findings, these studies suggest that AF exerts a dominant-negative effect on A or F by forming nonfunctional heterodimers with these variants.
|
|
|
The effect of furosemide is presented in the bottom row. Here again, PCR analyses show that the variants are affected differentially by this maneuver. As illustrated in Fig. 7 (A and B), e.g., the expression levels of A are seen to increase substantially (by a factor of 2.3, P < 0.01, n = 3) following the administration of furosemide, whereas those of F and AF are seen to decrease (by a factor of 2.4 and 1.5, respectively, P < 0.01, n = 5). As for the in situ hybridization studies (Fig. 7 C), results are once more consistent with those obtained by PCR, showing an expected rise in msNKCC2-specific signals with the A oligoprobe but a decrease in these signals with the F oligoprobe.
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
An alternative role that could be played by Ct1 and Ct2 is to promote the formation of molecular interactions within the Ct of one monomer instead of between the Cts of two monomers. Although such a possibility cannot be ruled out with certainty, we still favor the hypothesis that the primary purpose of Ct1 and Ct2 is to support intermonomeric associations. Indeed, the organization of a protein into a tertiary structure, that is, the mechanism by which intramolecular folding occurs, is to a large extent mediated by the action of chaperones, foldases, or isomerases (Fink, 1999), whereas the organization of a protein into a homooligomeric structure generally relies on the presence of self-interacting domains as those described here (Fink, 1999
; Engelman et al., 2003
).
A significant outcome of the mapping analyses that were conducted in this study is the identification of <200 candidate residues that may underlie the Ct1Ct2 association. As depicted in Fig. 4 E, these candidate residues are regrouped into four clusters (called EIRs) that are dispersed along the COOH terminus; EIR1 corresponds to Ct2NKCC2(671726), EIR2 to Ct2NKCC2(783816), EIR3 to Ct2NKCC2(910959), and EIR4 to Ct2NKCC2(10591098). This level of resolution was obtained by showing that the Ct1Ct2 domains, which had already been mapped partially in huNKCC1, are functionally conserved between the isoforms, by sequencing all of the huNKCC2 prey identified in the library, and by analyzing the behavior of yeast expressing truncated versions of Ct1 or Ct2 protein segments.
The importance of mapping the oligomerization domains of NKCC2 stems from the possibility of exploiting certain interacting residues as molecular targets for future structure function studies, and from the insight that could be gained into the molecular principles of oligomerization for this transport system. By way of illustration, it may become possible through various interventions, e.g., site-directed mutagenesis or peptide interference (Bjornson et al., 2003; Polo et al., 2004
), to alter carrier assembly as a means of determining whether the monomeric structure is functional or correctly targeted at the cell membrane and if so, whether its kinetic features differ from those of the oligomer. Along the same line, the mapping analyses performed here could lead to the identification of novel motifs or mechanisms that are involved in proteinprotein interactions or carrier assembly.
A potential shortcoming of the method employed to map the oligomerization domains of huNKCC2 comes from the widely dispersed localization of the candidate interacting residues. In fact, the specific manner in which these residues are disposed suggests that some level of tertiary organization may be required for Ct1Ct2 associations to occur in cells and implies that some of the unmapped regions (e.g., those represented by light gray boxes in Fig. 4) will include long stretches of residues flanked by EIRs on both sides. Hence, certain deletions could result in false negatives by generating conformational artifacts and erroneous interpretations of where EIRs reside, or will have to include one of the EIRs. The relocalization of EIR1 based on the current analysis may represent a good illustration of these potential limitations.
Left alone, the finding that the COOH terminus of NKCC2 can interact with that of NKCC1 is of disputable physiological importance given that these isoforms are not expressed in the same cell types. However, it does point toward the possibility that certain carriers within the same CCC subgroup or from different CCC subgroups could associate with one another in vivo. Indeed, several of these transport systems share similar amino acid sequences, tissue distributions, and subcellular localizations (Haas and Forbush, 1998 and 2000
; Russell, 2000
; Hebert et al., 2004
). Heterooligomeric assemblies between various CCC isoforms would carry the advantage of broadening functional diversity within the family.
The existence of conserved oligomerization domains among CCC family members suggests that certain NKCC2 variants could also assemble as heterooligomeric complexes. Two lines of evidence are in fact consistent with this possibility. (1) Ct1 domains appear to interact specifically with Ct2 domains (and vice et versa) throughout a region of huNKCC2 that is identical among the variants (Fig. 3 B). (2) When expressed in X. laevis oocytes, AF can exert dominant-negative effects on A or F (Fig. 6). This variant, which probably constitutes a substantial fraction of NKCC2-derived transcripts in the mammalian TAL based on the current PCR data, and which has been isolated from the renal medulla where A and F are coexpressed, could thus play a similar role in vivo (Payne and Forbush, 1994). Collectively, these observations also suggest that the inclusion of both the A and F exons in the same protein is not simply the result of splicing artifacts as previously suspected.
If AF does play an important role in vivo, transcriptional or posttranscriptional activity for this variant should be affected by a number of stimuli or conditions that act upon NKCC2-expressing cells. According to Western analyses performed in previous studies, these stimuli or conditions could include a long-term increase in circulating ADH levels or the administration of furosemide; indeed, both maneuvers have been shown to up-regulate NKCC2 synthesis in lagomorphs (Ecelbarger et al., 1996, 2001
; Knepper et al., 1999
). In the present work, we showed that the expression of AF in mouse was also affected by such maneuvers, that is, the number of AF transcripts decreased after 7-d regimens of H2O-rich or furosemide-enriched diets. The data reported here thus point toward a potential role for AF in adaptation responses, which may necessitate diverse levels of NKCC2 activity along the TAL.
The potential involvement of AF in overall salt reabsorption by the TAL is perhaps easier to decipher if the effect of different maneuvers on transcriptional and posttranscriptional activities for the other variants are also known. To this effect, our studies in mouse showed that the observed modifications in expression levels were not always matched between AF and the other variants. Such behaviors imply that the number of nonfunctional AF-containing oligomers could vary substantially under certain conditions and, accordingly, that changes in expression levels and transport activities for A or for F could also be poorly matched. In this setting, the regulated production of AF variants could represent a means by which separate NKCC2-expressing nephron segments alter their transport capacities differentially in response to the same transcriptional stimulus.
Growing evidence suggests that the optional inclusion or excision of specific exons in single gene-derived transcripts is a highly regulated process that involves specific components of the splicing machinery (Beyersmann, 2000; Xie and Black, 2001
). Hence, unmatched changes in the expression levels of A, F, or AF may imply that this machinery plays an important role during NKCC2-dependent adaptation responses. For instance, if a spliceosome becomes less active at the 3' splice site of exon F in A-expressing cells or at the 5' end of exon A in F-expressing cells, the number of AF transcripts produced would be expected to decrease and that of A or F to increase in parallel. Changes in expression levels through regulation of alternative splicing could then constitute an important posttranscriptional mechanism by which NKCC2-expressing cells coordinate their action appropriately in response to distinct sets of environmental cues.
Although we have not explored the mechanisms by which the H2O-rich diet led to changes in transcriptional of posttranscriptional activities for some of the variants, the large quantity of low salt fluid ingested by the mice and the pattern of responses observed suggest that these mechanisms are related, at least in part, to ADH suppression. In lagomorphs, for example, this hormone has been shown to increase NKCC2 expression, whereas the H2O diet administered here produced the opposite effect in that it decreased the expression of F and AF by >1.5-fold while leaving that of A relatively unchanged (Ecelbarger et al., 1996, 2001
; Knepper et al., 1999
). Such behaviors may also imply that A-mediated ion transport is more affected than F-mediated transport by changes in circulating ADH levels.
In this work, the mechanisms underlying the effect of loop diuresis were also not explored. It is nonetheless tempting to postulate that furosemide led to the observed changes by decreasing [Cl] in TAL cells. Indeed, several studies have shown that the activity of both NKCC1 and NKCC2 increases when intracellular Cl (Cli) is reduced nonpharmacologically (Lytle and Forbush, 1992; Haas and Forbush, 1998
, 2000
; Isenring et al., 1998a
; Russell, 2000
; Isenring and Forbush, 2001
; Darman and Forbush, 2002
; Gagnon et al., 2002
, 2003
; Simard et al., 2004b
). Although regulatory events that affect the transporter at posttranslational steps could play an important role in this response (Lytle and Forbush, 1992
; Darman and Forbush, 2002
), such mechanisms do not exclude the possibility of Cli-dependent regulatory events acting at earlier steps, especially in the setting of long term adaptation responses. In this regard, we showed that furosemide also exerted differential effects on variant expression, increasing that of A substantially, but reducing that of F and AF. These behaviors support the idea of a Cli-dependent pretranslational regulatory step, and imply once more that A-mediated ion transport is more affected than F-mediated transport by changes in Cli.
In conclusion, we have identified novel features regarding the modus operandi of the NKCC2 splice variants. These features may endow NKCC2-expressing cells with much greater functional diversity than expected for both the normal operations and the adaptation responses. Further studies are required to understand how the NKCC2-dependent splicing machinery is regulated and determine the extent of its contribution to changes in A, F, or AF expression along TAL.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
This work was supported by grants from the Canadian Institute of Health and Research (MOP-68949 and MOP-15405) and by the Kidney Foundation of Canada.
Lawrence G. Palmer served as editor.
Submitted: 24 May 2005
Accepted: 8 July 2005
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
|