Lymphatic Vessels as Targets of Tumor Therapy?

Terhi Karpanena and Kari Alitaloa
a Molecular/Cancer Biology Laboratory and Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Haartman Institute, and Helsinki University Hospital, Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland

Correspondence to: Kari Alitalo, Molecular/Cancer Biology Laboratory and Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki, PO Box 63 (Haartmaninkatu 8), Helsinki 00014, Finland. Tel:358-9-1912-6434 Fax:358-9-1912-6448 E-mail:kari.alitalo{at}helsinki.fi.

Recent evidence on the association of lymphangiogenic growth factors with intralymphatic growth and metastasis of cancers (1) (2) (3) (4) has raised hopes that lymphatic vessels could be used as an additional target for tumor therapy. Cancer cells spread within the body by direct invasion to surrounding tissues, spreading to body cavities, invasion into the blood vascular system (hematogenous metastasis), as well as spread via the lymphatic system (lymphatic metastasis). Regional lymph node dissemination is the first step in the metastasis of several common cancers and correlates highly to the prognosis of the disease. The lymph nodes that are involved in draining tissue fluid from the tumor area are called sentinel nodes, and diagnostic measures are in place to find these nodes and to remove them in cases of suspected metastasis. However, in spite of its clinical relevance, little is known about the mechanisms leading to metastasis via the bloodstream or via the lymphatics.

Until recently, the lymphatic vessels have received much less attention than blood vessels, despite their importance in medicine. Lymphatic vessels collect protein-rich fluid and white blood cells from the interstitial space of most tissues and transport them as a whitish opaque fluid, the lymph, into the blood circulation. Small lymphatic vessels coalesce into larger vessels, which drain the lymph through the thoracic duct into large veins in the neck region. Lymph nodes serve as filtering stations along the lymphatic vessels and lymph movement is propelled by the contraction of smooth muscles surrounding collecting lymphatic vessels and by bodily movements, the direction of flow being secured by valves as it is in veins. The lymphatic capillaries are lined by endothelial cells, which have distinct junctions with frequent large interendothelial gaps. The lymphatic capillaries also lack a continuous basement membrane, and are devoid of pericytes. Anchoring filaments connect the abluminal surfaces of lymphatic endothelial cells to the perivascular extracellular matrix and pull to maintain vessel patency in the presence of tissue edema. The absence or obstruction of lymphatic vessels, which is usually the result of an infection, surgery, or radiotherapy and in rare cases, a genetic defect, causes accumulation of a protein-rich fluid in tissues, lymphedema. The lymphatic system is also critical in fat absorption from the gut and in immune responses. Bacteria, viruses, and other foreign materials are taken up by the lymphatic vessels and transported to the lymph nodes, where the foreign material is presented to immune cells and where dendritic cells traverse via the lymphatics. There has been slow progress in the understanding of and ability to manipulate the lymphatic vessels during the past several decades.

Two members of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family, VEGF-C and VEGF-D, have been associated with lymphangiogenesis (5) (6) (7). These factors are ligands for the lymphatic endothelial VEGF receptor 3 (VEGFR-3), but upon proteolytic processing they gain the ability to bind and activate also VEGFR-2 (8) (9). VEGFR-2 is the main angiogenic signal transducer for VEGF while VEGFR-3 is specific for VEGF-C and VEGF-D and necessary and sufficient for lymphangiogenic signaling (for a review, see reference (10)). However, both VEGF-C and VEGF-D can also be angiogenic (11) (12), provided they undergo enough proteolytic processing, and that their receptors are expressed on the target blood vessels. In normal adult tissues VEGFR-3 is expressed almost exclusively in lymphatic endothelia, but for example in tumors it is also expressed in endothelial cells of blood vessels, where it is thought to contribute to tumor angiogenesis (13) (14). VEGF-C can also enhance blood vascular permeability via VEGFR-2 (15).

VEGF-C expression has been detected in about half of human cancers analyzed (16). In breast cancer VEGF-C expression seems to correlate with lymph node positive tumors whereas VEGF-D may be expressed predominantly in inflammatory breast carcinoma (17). Increased VEGF-C levels have also been reported to correlate with lymph node metastases in thyroid, prostate, gastric, colorectal, and lung cancers (18) (19) (20) (21) (22) (23). In one study VEGF-C expression correlated with lymphatic vessel density, but not metastasis (24). Such highly provocative clinical correlations between lymphangiogenic growth factor expression and metastasis should be extended to larger sets of patients and tumor types. In addition, animal models are needed to elucidate the mechanisms by which such correlation occurs. Clarijs et al. (25) attributed the strictly hematogenous metastasis of primary uveal melanomas to the absence of lymphatics in and around the tumor. Their data suggests that, although VEGFR-3 is expressed in tumor blood vessels, VEGF-C expression is not sufficient to induce lymphangiogenesis from preexisting blood vessels in human cancer. This is consistent with the conclusion of Kriehuber et al. (26) and Makinen et al. (27) that in adults differentiated lymphatic and blood vascular endothelial cells form separate and stable cell lineages. This reinforces the view that angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis represent coordinated but distinct processes that can be separately targeted in human diseases.

Mandriota et al. (1) established transgenic mice in which VEGF-C expression, driven by the rat insulin promoter, is targeted to the ß-cells of the endocrine pancreas. The transgenics developed an extensive network of lymphatic vessels around the islets of Langerhans, which normally do not have associated lymphatic vessels. The VEGF-C overexpressing mice were crossed with mice that develop pancreatic ß-cell tumors, which are neither lymphangiogenic nor metastatic. Double transgenic mice formed tumors surrounded by well-developed lymphatics, which frequently contained tumor cell masses of ß-cell origin. These mice also frequently developed metastases in the lymph nodes draining the pancreas. Similarly, human breast cancer cells expressing ectopic VEGF-C were recently shown to induce lymphangiogenesis in and around the orthotopically implanted tumors (2) (4) and to spread to the regional lymph nodes more frequently than the control cells (2). Stacker et al. (3) overexpressed VEGF-D in transformed human kidney cell xenografts in mice and obtained tumor lymphangiogenesis but also angiogenesis, probably because of increased proteolytic processing of VEGF-D. All groups used monoclonal antibodies against a lymphatic-specific hyaluronan receptor called LYVE-1 (28) (29) to demonstrate an increase of peritumoral lymph vessels when they compared VEGF-C or VEGF-D overexpressing tumors to control tumors. Intratumoral lymphatic vessels were also observed in the tumor xenografts, but not in the transgenic tumors, which may be at least partially explained by the trapping of vessels in between growing tumor foci in the xenografts that start from an injected cell suspension. Thus, tumor vascularization can be dissected into pathways that preferentially activate angiogenesis (driven by VEGF) and pathways that preferentially activate lymphangiogenesis (driven by VEGF-C and VEGF-D; Fig 1), although there now is evidence that both processes can occur simultaneously in response to certain growth factors (unpublished data).



View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Tumor lymphangiogenesis and its inhibition. VEGF-C and VEGF-D produced by tumor cells or associated inflammatory cells induce the growth of lymphatic vessels in the tumor periphery. These factors may also contribute to angiogenesis induced by VEGF. Tumor cells grow inside of the lymphatic vessels, which provide a route for tumor metastasis. Shown in the top part are various approaches to inhibit tumor lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis by blocking VEGFR-3 signaling.

Although it seems evident that VEGF-C can induce new lymphatic vessels as well as hyperplasia of preexisting lymphatic vessels (5) (6), we need to understand more about the relationship between VEGF-C and VEGF-D expression and lymphatic metastasis and its possible mechanisms. For example, is it sufficient for preexisting lymphatic vessels to expand by circumferential growth or does one need additional new vessels for the enhancement of metastasis? Do lymphatic vessels penetrate into existing tumors or are they just trapped in between expanding tumor foci, which appears likely in experimental tumor xenografts? Does lymphatic sprouting occur into tumors, or do lymphatics grow by peritumoral hyperplasia and by vessel splitting and fusion? Are the intratumoral lymphatic vessels seen in occasional tumors collapsed and nonfunctional because of the high interstitial pressure in solid tumors? Are all lymphatic endothelial cells derived from preexisting ones or is there contribution by some sort of precursor cells (lymphangioblasts) similar to what has been described for the blood vascular endothelium (hemangioblasts and endothelial precursor cells; for a review, see reference (30)) and for avian embryonic tissues (31). Do the blood vascular and lymphatic endothelia become irreversibly committed to their differentiated phenotypes, as suggested by the recent data (26) (27), and at what stage in their differentiation program does this occur? Does lymphangiogenesis follow tumor angiogenesis as it does in several developmental processes, where VEGF-C may act as a coupling factor between the two?

In human tumors, most of the lymphatic vessels occur peritumorally (32), but detection of occasional intratumoral lymphatic vessels can have prognostic significance, for example in melanomas of the skin (Michael Detmar, personal communication). It is not known to what extent tumor cell secreted factors are directly responsible for the large lymphatics detected around the tumor and to what extent for example inflammatory cells, such as macrophages contribute to lymphangiogenesis. VEGF-C is chemotactic for macrophages (33) and readily induced by proinflammatory cytokines (34) (35). The dilated and engorged peritumoral lymphatics may function poorly because intralymphatic growth of tumor cells clogs such vessels. Could this cause a backwash effect diverting invading cells into the venous circulation?

The simplest explanation for the metastasis-enhancing effects of VEGF-C and VEGF-D is that they eliminate one rate-limiting step by increasing the surface contact area between the invading tumor cells and the hyperplastic lymphatic endothelium. However, VEGF-C could also facilitate metastasis by increasing vascular permeability, or by changing the adhesive properties or cytokine or chemokine expression patterns of the lymphatic endothelium. For example, there is evidence that the lymphatic expression of the secondary lymphoid tissue chemokine (SLC; reference (26)) not only attracts dendritic cells, but also certain tumor cells expressing the corresponding receptors (36). VEGF-C and VEGF-D secreted by tumor cells could also have important effects on the tumor interstitial pressure. Both can increase vascular leak, but not as efficiently as VEGF (15), and a possible parallel increase in lymphangiogenesis could alleviate this effect. The increased interstitial pressure could be a major determinant of tumor cell seeding into the blood vascular and lymphatic circulation, especially as recent studies have shown that a significant proportion of the surface of tumor blood vessels is covered by the tumor cells (37) (38).

The switch on of tumor angiogenesis occurs at least partially due to activation of matrix metalloproteases upon tumor progression (39). Tumor or associated inflammatory cell secreted proteases can also cleave VEGF-C and VEGF-D and thus regulate their angiogenic versus lymphangiogenic properties. Furthermore, at least some specific genetic events in tumor progression correlate with lymphatic metastasis and a lymphangiogenic switch mechanism could operate upon such oncogenic insults. In a recent study Cavallaro et al. (40) found that in transgenic mice deficient of the neural cell adhesion molecule, pancreatic tumors show disaggregation and detachment of cells and disperse cell clumps that can be found in blood and lymphatic vessels and which metastasize to nearby lymph nodes. It would be interesting to know if VEGF-C or VEGF-D are upregulated in such tumors.

Recent reports have indicated that at least newly formed lymphatic vessels are dependent on molecular signals that can be interrupted (41), and these findings form a basis for the inhibition of lymphangiogenesis. In transgenic mice with targeted expression of a soluble form of VEGFR-3 in the skin, lymphatic vessels initially formed normally, but the onset of transgene expression led to regression of lymphatic vessels in embryos and to mice that completely lack a dermal lymphatic system (41). Such mice now serve as a model for studies of for example skin tumor metastasis in the absence of the lymphatic vessels. Furthermore, neutralizing antibodies against VEGF-D decreased the number of lymphatic metastases of the VEGF-D producing tumors (3) and soluble VEGFR-3 produced via an adenovirus vector could inhibit tumor-associated lymphangiogenesis in a transplantable human breast carcinoma model in SCID mice ((4); Fig 2). Microhemorrhage and the subsequent collapse of large tumor vessels was also reported in mice injected with blocking monoclonal antibodies against VEGFR-3 (42); thus, VEGFR-3 targeted therapy has the possibility of destabilizing tumor blood vessels as well. It is now essential to find out if such anti-lymphangiogenic treatments have side effects on normal vascular function.



View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Inhibition of tumor lymphangiogenesis by adenovirally encoded soluble VEGFR-3. MCF-7 breast carcinoma cells were stably transfected with a VEGF-C expression plasmid (A and B) or an empty vector (C) and 107 cells were injected into the mammary fad pads of ovariectomized SCID mice carrying slow-release estrogen pellets. The mice were injected intravenously with 109 PFU of an adenovirus encoding soluble VEGFR-3 (B) or control adenovirus (A and C). See reference 4 for further details.

Besides the recently identified lymphatic endothelial cell surface proteins, the lymphatic vessels are also likely to express other tissue- and even tumor-specific molecules. Methods such as cDNA microarray analysis and phage display screening are being used to identify relevant markers and use them for selective drug targeting to the lymphatic vessels. Targeted imaging of lymphatic vessels could also be possible in cancer patients. The current targeting technologies make it possible to develop almost any drug into a targeted compound, thereby increasing the potency of the drug at the intended target tissue, while reducing side effects elsewhere in the body (43) (44). An attractive possibility would also be to target anti-cancer drugs into the tumor lymphatics and to specifically destroy peritumoral lymphatic vessels, which could inhibit lymphatic metastasis. However, we do not know yet whether lymphatic destruction would further elevate the tumor interstitial pressure, which is a severe problem for drug delivery into tumors and presumably a risk factor for hematogenous metastasis (45) (46). One consideration is that there could be a compensatory increase of lymphangiogenic growth factor levels; at least VEGF-D expression is regulated by cell–cell contacts (47).

For the discovery of drug targets in the lymphatic endothelium, direct in vivo screening poses a problem, because of the complexity of tissues within which the slender lymphatic vessels are embedded. An alternative is to isolate differentiated lymphatic endothelial cells. Previous studies have reported on the isolation of lymphatic endothelium from lymphangiomas or from large mesenteric or thoracic collecting ducts (for a review, see reference (48)). In the study of Kriehuber et al. (26) human skin was used for the isolation of the endothelial cells derived from lymphatic capillaries. This advance comes with the discovery of the lymphatic endothelium-specific marker podoplanin, a glomerular podocyte membrane mucoprotein (49). Both podoplanin and LYVE-1 appear useful for the isolation of lymphatic endothelial cells, although neither is absolutely specific for these cells. Monoclonal antibodies against VEGFR-3 also allowed the isolation of lymphatic endothelial cells, which grew in culture in the presence of VEGF-C and a suitable pericellular matrix without losing their differentiated properties (27). Specific VEGFR-3 ligands could induce cell migration and protected serum-deprived lymphatic endothelial cells from apoptosis. In normal adult tissues VEGFR-3 antibodies are useful for the isolation of lymphatic endothelial cells because the expression of VEGFR-3 occurs almost exclusively by lymphatic vessels (50). However, as already mentioned, in tumors it tends to lose its specificity due to its upregulation in the angiogenic blood vessels (13) (14).

There has been very little progress during the past several decades in the ability to manipulate lymphatic vessel growth or function. This may have changed now. The discovery of the VEGF-C and VEGF-D growth factors for lymphatic vessels as well as their receptor VEGFR-3 has revived the lymphatic vascular field. Isolation and culture of lymphatic endothelial cells is another milestone that facilitates the screening of useful drug targets in this system. One important task for further research is to analyze the effects of various inhibitors of VEGFR-3 on tumor growth, angiogenesis, interstitial pressure, lymphangiogenesis, and metastasis (see Fig 1). Another important one is to study how to reconstitute lymphatic vessels of patients with lymphedema after surgery or radiotherapy. This research provides a unique opportunity for the development of new and innovative medical technology for cancer and other human diseases.

Submitted: 16 July 2001
Accepted: 9 August 2001

  References
Top
References

  1. Mandriota, S.J., Jussila, L., Jeltsch, M., Compagni, A., Baetens, D., Prevo, R., Banerji, S., Huarte, J., Montesano, R., and Jackson, D.G. et al. 2001. Vascular endothelial growth factor-C-mediated lymphangiogenesis promotes tumour metastasis. EMBO J. 20:672-682[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  2. Skobe, M., Hawighorst, T., Jackson, D.G., Prevo, R., Janes, L., Velasco, P., Riccardi, L., Alitalo, K., Claffey, K., and Detmar, M. 2001. Induction of tumor lymphangiogenesis by VEGF-C promotes breast cancer metastasis. Nat. Med. 7:192-198[Medline].

  3. Stacker, S.A., Caesar, C., Baldwin, M.E., Thornton, G.E., Williams, R.A., Prevo, R., Jackson, D.G., Nishikawa, S., Kubo, H., and Achen, M.G. 2001. VEGF-D promotes the metastatic spread of tumor cells via the lymphatics. Nat. Med. 7:186-191[Medline].

  4. Karpanen, T., Egeblad, M., Karkkainen, M.J., Kubo, H., Yla-Herttuala, S., Jaattela, M., and Alitalo, K. 2001. Vascular endothelial growth factor C promotes tumor lymphangiogenesis and intralymphatic tumor growth. Cancer Res. 61:1786-1790[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  5. Jeltsch, M., Kaipainen, A., Joukov, V., Meng, X., Lakso, M., Rauvala, H., Swartz, M., Fukumura, D., Jain, R.K., and Alitalo, K. 1997. Hyperplasia of lymphatic vessels in VEGF-C transgenic mice. Science. 276:1423-1425[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  6. Oh, S.J., Jeltsch, M.M., Birkenhager, R., McCarthy, J.E., Weich, H.A., Christ, B., Alitalo, K., and Wilting, J. 1997. VEGF and VEGF-C: specific induction of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in the differentiated avian chorioallantoic membrane. Dev. Biol. 188:96-109[Medline].

  7. Veikkola, T., Jussila, L., Makinen, T., Karpanen, T., Jeltsch, M., Petrova, T.V., Kubo, H., Thurston, G., McDonald, D.M., and Achen, M.G. et al. 2001. Signalling via vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 is sufficient for lymphangiogenesis in transgenic mice. EMBO J. 20:1223-1231[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  8. Joukov, V., Pajusola, K., Kaipainen, A., Chilov, D., Lahtinen, I., Kukk, E., Saksela, O., Kalkkinen, N., and Alitalo, K. 1996. A novel vascular endothelial growth factor, VEGF-C, is a ligand for the Flt4 (VEGFR-3) and KDR (VEGFR-2) receptor tyrosine kinases. EMBO J. 15:290-298[Abstract].

  9. Achen, M.G., Jeltsch, M., Kukk, E., Makinen, T., Vitali, A., Wilks, A.F., Alitalo, K., and Stacker, S.A. 1998. Vascular endothelial growth factor D (VEGF-D) is a ligand for the tyrosine kinases VEGF receptor 2 (Flk1) and VEGF receptor 3 (Flt4). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:548-553[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  10. Karkkainen, M.J., and Petrova, T.V. 2000. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptors in the regulation of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Oncogene. 19:5598-5605[Medline].

  11. Cao, Y., Linden, P., Farnebo, J., Cao, R., Eriksson, A., Kumar, V., Qi, J.H., Claesson-Welsh, L., and Alitalo, K. 1998. Vascular endothelial growth factor C induces angiogenesis in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:14389-14394[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  12. Witzenbichler, B., Asahara, T., Murohara, T., Silver, M., Spyridopoulos, I., Magner, M., Principe, N., Kearney, M., Hu, J.S., and Isner, J.M. 1998. Vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C/VEGF-2) promotes angiogenesis in the setting of tissue ischemia. Am. J. Pathol. 153:381-394[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  13. Valtola, R., Salven, P., Heikkila, P., Taipale, J., Joensuu, H., Rehn, M., Pihlajaniemi, T., Weich, H., deWaal, R., and Alitalo, K. 1999. VEGFR-3 and its ligand VEGF-C are associated with angiogenesis in breast cancer. Am. J. Pathol. 154:1381-1390[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  14. Partanen, T.A., Alitalo, K., and Miettinen, M. 1999. Lack of lymphatic vascular specificity of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 in 185 vascular tumors. Cancer. 86:2406-2412[Medline].

  15. Joukov, V., Sorsa, T., Kumar, V., Jeltsch, M., Claesson-Welsh, L., Cao, Y., Saksela, O., Kalkkinen, N., and Alitalo, K. 1997. Proteolytic processing regulates receptor specificity and activity of VEGF-C. EMBO J. 16:3898-3911[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  16. Salven, P., Lymboussaki, A., Heikkila, P., Jaaskela-Saari, H., Enholm, B., Aase, K., von Euler, G., Eriksson, U., Alitalo, K., and Joensuu, H. 1998. Vascular endothelial growth factors VEGF-B and VEGF-C are expressed in human tumors. Am. J. Pathol. 153:103-108[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  17. Kurebayashi, J., Otsuki, T., Kunisue, H., Mikami, Y., Tanaka, K., Yamamoto, S., and Sonoo, H. 1999. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family members in breast cancer. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 90:977-981[Medline].

  18. Bunone, G., Vigneri, P., Mariani, L., Buto, S., Collini, P., Pilotti, S., Pierotti, M.A., and Bongarzone, I. 1999. Expression of angiogenesis stimulators and inhibitors in human thyroid tumors and correlation with clinical pathological features. Am. J. Pathol. 155:1967-1976[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  19. Tsurusaki, T., Kanda, S., Sakai, H., Kanetake, H., Saito, Y., Alitalo, K., and Koji, T. 1999. Vascular endothelial growth factor-C expression in human prostatic carcinoma and its relationship to lymph node metastasis. Br. J. Cancer. 80:309-313[Medline].

  20. Yonemura, Y., Endo, Y., Fujita, H., Fushida, S., Ninomiya, I., Bandou, E., Taniguchi, K., Miwa, K., Ohoyama, S., Sugiyama, K., and Sasaki, T. 1999. Role of vascular endothelial growth factor C expression in the development of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 5:1823-1829[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  21. Akagi, K., Ikeda, Y., Miyazaki, M., Abe, T., Kinoshita, J., Maehara, Y., and Sugimachi, K. 2000. Vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C) expression in human colorectal cancer tissues. Br. J. Cancer. 83:887-891[Medline].

  22. Niki, T., Iba, S., Tokunou, M., Yamada, T., Matsuno, Y., and Hirohashi, S. 2000. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factors A, B, C, and D and their relationships to lymph node status in lung adenocarcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 6:2431-2439[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  23. Ohta, Y., Nozawa, H., Tanaka, Y., Oda, M., and Watanabe, Y. 2000. Increased vascular endothelial growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor-c and decreased nm23 expression associated with microdissemination in the lymph nodes in stage I non-small cell lung cancer. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 119:804-813[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  24. Ohta, Y., Shridhar, V., Bright, R.K., Kalemkerian, G.P., Du, W., Carbone, M., Watanabe, Y., and Pass, H.I. 1999. VEGF and VEGF type C play an important role in angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in human malignant mesothelioma tumours. Br. J. Cancer. 81:54-61[Medline].

  25. Clarijs, R., Schalkwijk, L., Ruiter, D.J., and de Waal, R.M. 2001. Lack of lymphangiogenesis despite coexpression of VEGF-C and its receptor Flt-4 in uveal melanoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 42:1422-1428[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  26. Kriehuber, E., Breiteneder-Galeff, S., Groeger, M., Soleiman, A., Schoppman, S.F., Stingl, G., Kerjaschki, D., and Maurer, D. 2001. Isolation and characterization of dermal lymphatic and blood endothelial cells reveal stable and functionally specialized cell lineages. J. Exp. Med. 194:797-808[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  27. Makinen, T., Veikkola, T., Mustjoki, S., Karpanen, T., Catimel, B., Nice, E.C., Wise, L., Mercer, A., Kowalski, H., and Kerjaschki, D. et al. 2001. Isolated lymphatic endothelial cells transduce growth, survival and migratory signals via the VEGF-C/D receptor VEGFR-3. EMBO J. 20:4762-4773[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  28. Banerji, S., Ni, J., Wang, S.X., Clasper, S., Su, J., Tammi, R., Jones, M., and Jackson, D.G. 1999. LYVE-1, a new homologue of the CD44 glycoprotein, is a lymph-specific receptor for hyaluronan. J. Cell Biol. 144:789-801[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  29. Prevo, R., Banerji, S., Ferguson, D.J., Clasper, S., and Jackson, D.G. 2001. Mouse LYVE-1 is an endocytic receptor for hyaluronan in lymphatic endothelium. J. Biol. Chem. 276:19420-19430[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  30. Rafii, S. 2000. Circulating endothelial precursors: mystery, reality, and promise. J. Clin. Invest. 105:17-19[Free Full Text].

  31. Wilting, J., Papoutsi, M., Schneider, M., and Christ, B. 2000. The lymphatic endothelium of the avian wing is of somitic origin. Dev. Dyn. 217:271-278[Medline].

  32. de Waal, R.M., van Altena, M.C., Erhard, H., Weidle, U.H., Nooijen, P.T., and Ruiter, D.J. 1997. Lack of lymphangiogenesis in human primary cutaneous melanoma. Consequences for the mechanism of lymphatic dissemination. Am. J. Pathol. 150:1951-1957[Abstract].

  33. Skobe, M., Hamberg, L.M., Hawighorst, T., Schirner, M., Wolf, G.L., Alitalo, K., and Detmar, M. 2001. Concurrent induction of lymphangiogenesis, angiogenesis and macrophage recruitment by VEGF-C in melanoma. Am. J. Pathol. In press.

  34. Ristimaki, A., Narko, K., Enholm, B., Joukov, V., and Alitalo, K. 1998. Proinflammatory cytokines regulate expression of the lymphatic endothelial mitogen vascular endothelial growth factor-C. J. Biol. Chem. 273:8413-8418[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  35. Enholm, B., Paavonen, K., Ristimaki, A., Kumar, V., Gunji, Y., Klefstrom, J., Kivinen, L., Laiho, M., Olofsson, B., and Joukov, V. et al. 1997. Comparison of VEGF, VEGF-B, VEGF-C and Ang-1 mRNA regulation by serum, growth factors, oncoproteins and hypoxia. Oncogene. 14:2475-2483[Medline].

  36. Muller, A., Homey, B., Soto, H., Ge, N., Catron, D., Buchanan, M.E., McClanahan, T., Murphy, E., Yuan, W., and Wagner, S.N. et al. 2001. Involvement of chemokine receptors in breast cancer metastasis. Nature. 410:50-56[Medline].

  37. Hashizume, H., Baluk, P., Morikawa, S., McLean, J.W., Thurston, G., Roberge, S., Jain, R.K., and McDonald, D.M. 2000. Openings between defective endothelial cells explain tumor vessel leakiness. Am. J. Pathol. 156:1363-1380[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  38. Chang, Y.S., di Tomaso, E., McDonald, D.M., Jones, R., Jain, R.K., and Munn, L.L. 2000. Mosaic blood vessels in tumors: frequency of cancer cells in contact with flowing blood. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:14608-14613[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  39. Bergers, G., Brekken, R., McMahon, G., Vu, T.H., Itoh, T., Tamaki, K., Tanzawa, K., Thorpe, P., Itohara, S., Werb, Z., and Hanahan, D. 2000. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 triggers the angiogenic switch during carcinogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:737-744[Medline].

  40. Cavallaro, U., Niedermeyer, J., Fuxa, M., and Christofori, G. 2001. N-CAM modulates tumour-cell adhesion to matrix by inducing FGF-receptor signalling. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:650-657[Medline].

  41. Makinen, T., Jussila, L., Veikkola, T., Karpanen, T., Kettunen, M.I., Pulkkanen, K.J., Kauppinen, R., Jackson, D.G., Kubo, H., and Nishikawa, S. et al. 2001. Inhibition of lymphangiogenesis with resulting lymphedema in transgenic mice expressing soluble VEGF receptor-3. Nat. Med. 7:199-205[Medline].

  42. Kubo, H., Fujiwara, T., Jussila, L., Hashi, H., Ogawa, M., Shimizu, K., Awane, M., Sakai, Y., Takabayashi, A., and Alitalo, K. et al. 2000. Involvement of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 in maintenance of integrity of endothelial cell lining during tumor angiogenesis. Blood. 96:546-553[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  43. Arap, W., Pasqualini, R., and Ruoslahti, E. 1998. Chemotherapy targeted to tumor vasculature. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 10:560-565[Medline].

  44. Ruoslahti, E. 2000. Targeting tumor vasculature with homing peptides from phage display. Semin. Cancer Biol. 10:435-442[Medline].

  45. Boucher, Y., Baxter, L.T., and Jain, R.K. 1990. Interstitial pressure gradients in tissue-isolated and subcutaneous tumors: implications for therapy. Cancer Res. 50:4478-4484[Abstract].

  46. Carmeliet, P., and Jain, R.K. 2000. Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases. Nature. 407:249-257[Medline].

  47. Orlandini, M., and Oliviero, S. 2001. In fibroblasts Vegf-D expression is induced by cell-cell contact mediated by cadherin-11. J. Biol. Chem. 276:6576-6581[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  48. Pepper, M.S. 2001. Lymphangiogenesis and tumor metastasis: myth or reality? Clin. Cancer Res. 7:462-468[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  49. Breiteneder-Geleff, S., Soleiman, A., Kowalski, H., Horvat, R., Amann, G., Kriehuber, E., Diem, K., Weninger, W., Tschachler, E., Alitalo, K., and Kerjaschki, D. 1999. Angiosarcomas express mixed endothelial phenotypes of blood and lymphatic capillaries: podoplanin as a specific marker for lymphatic endothelium. Am. J. Pathol. 154:385-394[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  50. Partanen, T., Arola, J., Saaristo, A., Jussila, L., Ora, A., Miettinen, M., Stacker, S., Achen, M., and Alitalo, K. 2000. VEGF-C and VEGF-D expression in neuroendocrine cells and their receptor, VEGFR-3 in fenetrated blood vessels in human tissues. FASEB J. 14:2087-2096[Abstract/Free Full Text].