By
From the * Division of Hematology-Oncology, Cornell University Medical College, New York 10021;
the James Ewing Laboratory of Developmental Hematopoiesis, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center, New York 10021; the § Department of Immunology, Berlex Biosciences, Richmond, California
94804; the
Department of Medicine II, University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany; and
the ¶ Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19104
![]() |
Abstract |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Although thrombopoietin has been shown to promote megakaryocyte (MK) proliferation and
maturation, the exact mechanism and site of platelet formation are not well defined. Studies
have shown that MKs may transmigrate through bone marrow endothelial cells (BMEC), and
release platelets within the sinusoidal space or lung capillaries. In search for chemotactic factor(s) that may mediate transmigration of MKs, we have discovered that mature polyploid MKs
express the G protein-coupled chemokine receptor CXCR4 (Fusin, LESTR). Therefore, we
explored the possibility that stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1), the ligand for CXCR4, may also induce transendothelial migration of mature MKs. SDF-1, but not other CXC or CC
chemokines, was able to mediate MK migration (ED50 = 125 pmol/liter). The MK chemotaxis induced by SDF-1 was inhibited by the CXCR4-specific mAb (12G5) and by pertussis
toxin, demonstrating that signaling via the G protein-coupled receptor CXCR4 was necessary
for migration. SDF-1 also induced MKs to migrate through confluent monolayers of BMEC
by increasing the affinity of MKs for BMEC. Activation of BMEC with interleukin 1 resulted in a threefold increase in the migration of MKs in response to SDF-1. Neutralizing mAb to the
endothelial-specific adhesion molecule E-selectin blocked the migration of MKs by 50%, suggesting that cellular interaction of MKs with BMEC is critical for the migration of MKs. Light
microscopy and ploidy determination of transmigrated MKs demonstrated predominance of
polyploid MKs. Virtually all platelets generated in the lower chamber also expressed CXCR4. Platelets formed in the lower chamber were functional and expressed P-selectin (CD62P) in
response to thrombin stimulation. Electron microscopy of the cells that transmigrated through
the BMEC monolayers in response to SDF-1 demonstrated the presence of intact polyploid MKs as well as MKs in the process of platelet formation. These results suggest that SDF-1 is a
potent chemotactic factor for mature MKs. Expression of CXCR4 may be the critical cellular
signal for transmigration of MKs and platelet formation.
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The development of megakaryocytes (MKs)1 can be divided into two distinct stages or compartments. The initial stage of MK development involves sequential proliferation of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells into rapidly proliferating megakaryoblasts. The second phase of MK development is comprised of a population of morphologically identifiable MKs that undergo nuclear endoreplication and ultimately fragment into functional platelets.
Thrombopoietin (TPO) has been shown not only to regulate MK proliferation, maturation, and endoreplication (1, 2), but also to induce platelet formation in vitro (3). However, whether the process of platelet formation in vivo is also mediated by TPO, alone or in combination with other factors, is not known (6). Recently it has been shown that NF-E2 (a hematopoietic specific transcription factor of erythroid cells and MKs) knockout mice, despite physiological levels of TPO and an increased level of MKs, have profound reduction in platelet counts (7, 8), suggesting that final stages of platelet formation and release may be regulated by as yet undefined cellular signaling pathways. Furthermore, bone marrow stromal cells have been shown to inhibit platelet release, suggesting that MKs may have to exit the bone marrow microenvironment to release platelets (9).
Several studies have shown that mature polyploid MKs reside in close proximity to bone marrow endothelial cells
(BMEC; references 10 and 11). Adherence of MKs to the
bone marrow stromal cell extracellular matrix induces extension of pseudopodia and final fragmentation into platelet-like
particles (12). MKs also express certain adhesion molecules that may enable them to interact with resting as well as
cytokine-activated endothelial cells (17, 18). Electron microscopic analysis of bone marrow biopsy samples has shown that
MKs residing at the subluminal surface of the BMEC are capable of transmigrating through the BMEC junctions (14, 19). Several lines of evidence suggest that MKs generated in the bone marrow also have the capacity to travel to the lungs, where MKs fragment into platelets (20). Collectively,
these data suggest that one mechanism whereby mature MKs
release platelets is transmigration through BMECreleasing
platelets in the sinusoidal space or by stochastic fragmentation
in the lung capillaries.
To date, very few reports have explored the effect of chemokines on MK trafficking. Chemokines such as platelet factor 4 (PF4) and neutrophil-activating peptide 2 (NAP-2) have been shown to have an inhibitory effect on MK development (23). However, there has been no report of a chemokine that may induce transmigration of MKs. In search for factors that may mediate transendothelial migration of MKs, we have found that mature polyploid MKs express the HIV coreceptor CXCR4. Stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1), the chemokine ligand for CXCR4, has been shown to induce transmigration of lymphocytes (26, 27) and CD34+ cells (28, 29). In addition, mice lacking SDF-1 have profound defects in hematopoiesis (30). In this report, we demonstrate that SDF-1, the ligand for CXCR4, increases the affinity of mature MKs for BMEC and induces transmigration of MKs through BMEC monolayers, resulting in augmentation of platelet release. These data suggest that expression of CXCR4 by mature MKs may be one of the major signaling pathways that may induce transmigration of MKs, thus initiating the process of platelet formation.
![]() |
Materials and Methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Preparation of BMEC Monolayer.
Primary BMEC were isolated by a standard method as described previously (31). For transmigration assays, 5-µm pore transwells covered with confluent monolayers of BMEC were prepared as described previously (32). Confluent monolayers of BMEC were cultured on bare transwells in medium 199 (M199; GIBCO BRL, Gaithersburg, MD) with 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Hyclone, Logan, UT), or with 20% FBS, 5 ng/ml basic fetal growth factor (bFGF), and 50 ng/ml heparin. Before transmigration assay, the integrity of the monolayer was confirmed by placing 100 µl medium 199/ 20% FBS containing [14C]albumin (American Radiolabeled Chemicals, St. Louis, MO) on the cells for 6 h and measuring the amount of radioactivity accumulating in the lower chamber (32).MK Preparation.
Mononuclear cells derived from human cord blood (CB) or G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood leukopheresis were separated from whole blood obtained from consenting donors, by Ficoll-Paque (d = 1.077 g/ml; Pharmacia Biotech AB, Uppsala, Sweden). CD34+ progenitor cells were purified from mononuclear cell preparations using magnetic cell sorting Dyna-beads (Dynal A.S., Oslo, Norway). CD34+ cells derived from CB were used for ex vivo expansion of MKs for the transmigration studies. MKs were ex vivo expanded with TPO (100 ng/ml) and Kit ligand (KL, 10 ng/ml) from CD34+ cells in Xvivo-20 (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD) medium for 14-16 d. The number of CD41a+ and CD42b+ cells on day 12, generated from ex vivo expansion of CB, was 57 ± 10 and 36 ± 4% of total expanding cells, respectively.Transmigration Assay.
Ex vivo-expanded MKs were washed once with HBSS solution and resuspended with fresh Xvivo-20 to a density of 106 cells/ml. Aliquots of the MK cell suspension (100 µl) were applied on 5-µm pore transwells, covered with or without confluent BMEC monolayer, in a 24-well plate (Boyden chamber; Costar Corp., Cambridge, MA [32]). Immediately, 600 µl of serum-free chemotactic medium, containing Xvivo-20 with or without various concentrations of chemokines, or MS5-conditioned medium prepared in Xvivo-20, was then placed in the lower chamber. After 3 h of incubation in bare transwells or 24 h in BMEC-covered transwells at 37°C in a CO2 incubator, MKs floating in the transwell, attached to BMEC, or transmigrated to the lower chamber were manually counted with a hemacytometer, and the phenotype was analyzed by two-color flow cytometry. For migration inhibition studies, MKs were preincubated with 40 µg/ml of mAb to CXCR4 (12G5) for 30 min or with 2.5 µg/ml pertussis toxin in Xvivo-20 for 90 min, washed once with HBSS, then placed in bare transwells as described above. For chemotactic versus chemokinetic analysis of SDF-1 function, MKs were suspended in medium containing the same concentration of SDF-1 as the lower chamber, and placed in bare transwells as described above. To examine the nature of the interaction between BMEC and MKs, transmigration through IL-1Flow Cytometry.
A total of 104-105 cells were incubated for 30 min at 4°C with the FITC- or PE-conjugated mAb CD41a-FITC, CD42b-FITC, or CXCR4-PE (clones HIP8, HIP1, and 12G5; PharMingen, San Diego, CA). Isotype-matched antibodies served as controls (IgG1 and IgG2a, FITC- or PE-conjugated; PharMingen). BMEC detached by collagenase or MKs grown in suspension were harvested by centrifugation and washed twice with PBS (pH 7.4). The cells were analyzed using an Elite flow cytometer (Coulter Corp., Hialeah, FL). For coexpression analysis, an FL-1/FL-2 contour plot was used to calculate the percentage of positive cells; a proportion of 1% false positive events was accepted in the negative control sample. The mean fluorescence intensity was calculated from the fluorescence histogram and expressed in arbitrary units.Cell Counts and Cytospin Preparation.
Cell numbers and concentrations were assessed using a hemacytometer or automated cell counter (Coulter Corp.). Viability of cells, always >95%, was confirmed manually with trypan blue, or by flow cytometry with propidium iodide staining. Standard cytospin preparations were stained with Wright-Giemsa. A differential count of at least 100 cells was performed for each cytospin preparation.SDF-1 Binding to MKs.
Ex vivo-expanded MK cells derived from CB (6.3 × 106 cells per 200 ml) were incubated in PBS with 125I-labeled SDF-1 in the presence and absence of various concentrations of unlabeled SDF-1 at room temperature for 30 min. The incubation was terminated by removing aliquots from the cell suspension and separating cells from buffer by centrifugation through a silicone/paraffin oil mixture. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 1 mM unlabeled ligand. The binding data were curve-fitted with the computer program IGOR (WaveMetrics, Inc., Lake Oswego, OR) to determine binding affinity (Kd), and Scatchard analysis was used for number of sites per cell.Cell Cycle Analysis of MKs.
Ploidy of nonmigrated and migrated CD41a+ MKs was analyzed by propidium iodide. Migrated and nonmigrated MKs were stained with CD41a-FITC and fixed overnight in 70% ethanol at 4°C. After staining with 50 µg/ml propidium iodide containing 100 U/ml RNase A in PBS (pH 7.4) Ca2+Mg2+, the MKs were analyzed by flow cytometry focusing on the FITC-positive gate.Antibodies and Reagents.
The chemokines IL-8, monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-1, macrophage-inflammatory protein (MIP)-1Electron Microscopy.
Electron microscopy was performed on the migrated MKs and platelets formed in the lower chamber of the transwell plates. Immediately and 24 h after migration of the MKs in response to SDF-1, the MKs and generated platelets were fixed immediately in 2% paraformaldehyde, 0.5% glutaraldehyde. After dehydration, the samples were embedded for electron microscopy. 60-70-nm (Silver grade) sections were cut using a diamond knife (Diatome, Fort Washington, PA). Sections were stained with 0.1% lead citrate and examined using an electron microscope (model 100CXII; JEOL, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 80 kV.Statistical Analysis.
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM of four to five independent experiments. To detect differences between migrating and nonmigrating cells, the t test for paired samples was applied. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. ![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Human MKs derived from CB were ex vivo expanded with TPO (100 ng/ ml) and KL (10 ng/ml). The time course of expression of CXCR4 on ex vivo-expanded MKs was measured by two-color flow cytometry using PE-conjugated mAb to CXCR4 (CXCR4-PE, 12G5) and FITC-conjugated mAb to various specific MK markers, including GPIIb/IIIa (CD41a-FITC) and GPIb (CD42b-FITC). CD41a is expressed on early megakaryoblasts, and its expression persists with maturation of MKs. CD42b is another specific MK marker which is mainly expressed on the mature polyploid MKs.
In the first few days of MK expansion, the number of CD41a+CXCR4+ cells comprised a very small percentage of the total CD41a+ population. However, by days 12-16 of expansion, the majority of CD41a+ cells were CXCR4+ (n = 5; Fig. 1 A). Moreover, two-color flow cytometry with CXCR4-PE and CD42b-FITC revealed that all mature CD42b+ cells expressed CXCR4 (n = 5; Fig. 1 B). These data suggest that CXCR4 is expressed on MKs, and that its expression is enhanced with maturation of MKs. The majority of the CD41a and CD42b-negative population was comprised of immature CD41a+ MKs and CD15+ myeloid progenitor cells.
|
The capacity of SDF-1 to induce transmigration of ex vivo-expanded MKs was examined in a modified Boyden chamber, using a 5-µm bare transwell plate. In the absence of SDF-1 in the lower chamber, there was virtually no migration (Fig. 2 A). However, addition of 200 ng/ml of SDF-1 or SDF-1 containing conditioned medium from the MS5 cell line to the lower chamber resulted in significant migration of CD41a+ MKs. On average, 20% of MKs added to the upper chamber had migrated through the 5-µm pore within 3 h.
|
Replacement of SDF-1 with TPO (100 ng/ml), IL-8
(200 ng/ml, CXCR1 ligand), or other CC or CXC
chemokines at 100-200 ng/ml, including MIP-1 (CCR1
ligand), MIP-1
, RANTES (regulated upon activation,
normal T cell expressed and secreted, CCR5 ligand), MCP-1
(CCR2 ligand), Eotaxin (CCR3 ligand), TARC (CCR4
ligand), MIP-3
(LARC, CCR6 ligand), MIP-3
(ELC,
CCR7 ligand), failed to induce migration of MKs (Fig. 2 A).
We and others have shown that MKs express vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)R1 (fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 [FLT-1]; reference 34) and c-kit receptor (35). Both VEGF
and KL have been shown to induce chemotaxis and
chemokinesis of certain hematopoietic cells (36). However, KL failed to induce migration of CD41a+CXCR4+ MKs
(Fig. 2 A). Furthermore, VEGF failed to induce migration of
MKs (data not shown). In addition, replacement of TPO
with all other known megakaryopoietins, including IL-6,
IL-11, bFGF, and PF4, failed to induce migration of MKs.
These data suggest that among the numerous known
chemokines and megakaryopoietins, only SDF-1 has a substantial effect on the migration of MKs.
Preincubation of MK cells with the blocking CXCR4 mAb (12G5) was able to block SDF-1-induced chemotaxis (n = 4, P <0.05; Fig. 2 B). 12G5 mAb was also able to block chemotaxis induced by SDF-1 containing conditioned medium from the stromal cell line MS5 (data not shown). Addition of the G-coupled protein inhibitor pertussis toxin (2.5 µg/ml) completely abrogated the migration of MKs (n = 4, P <0.05; Fig. 2 B). Neutralization of the SDF-1 gradient by adding SDF-1 (200 ng/ml) to both upper and lower chambers resulted in inhibition of migration of MKs, indicating that SDF-1's predominant action on MKs is chemotactic rather than chemokinetic (n = 5). Decrease in the concentration of SDF-1 to 50 ng/ml in the upper chamber while keeping the SDF-1 concentration constant in the lower chamber (200 ng/ml) resulted in recovery of 18 ± 5% of SDF-1 chemotactic activity (n = 3). These results suggest that the physiological activity of SDF-1 may depend on the generation of a gradient secretion of the chemokine within the bone marrow microenvironment.
Since the extracellular matrix within the bone marrow microenvironment is enriched with heparinoid molecules, we explored the possibility that heparin-bound SDF-1 within the bone marrow may be less functionally active. Introduction of heparin significantly inhibited migration of MKs (n = 4, P <0.05; Fig. 2 B), suggesting that binding of SDF-1 to heparin reduces SDF-1 activity, creating a functional gradient within the bone marrow microenvironment.
The ED50 for migration of CD41a+ MKs in response to SDF-1 is ~125 pmol/liter (n = 3; Fig. 2 C). To determine the relative amount of CXCR4 receptors expressed on the surface of these cells, we performed SDF-1 ligand binding studies on TPO/KL ex vivo-expanded immunomagnetic purified MK cells. 125I-labeled SDF-1 displacement binding studies revealed a dissociation constant (Kd) for SDF-1 binding to MKs of 17 ± 5 nM (data not shown). By Scatchard analysis of the SDF-1 binding data, 2.14 × 105 receptors per cell were estimated. Collectively, the binding and chemotaxis data suggest that SDF-1 is a potent chemokine for mature MKs.
SDF-1-induced Transmigration of MKs through BMEC.To explore the possibility that interaction between the BMEC and mature MKs in response to SDF-1 may be critical for MK migration, ex vivo-expanded MKs were placed in transwell plates coated with confluent monolayers of BMEC. Subsequently, SDF-1 at 200 ng/ml was added to the lower chamber. In the absence of SDF-1, there was no migration or increased adhesion of MKs to BMEC. However, in the presence of SDF-1, 14 ± 3% of MKs migrated through BMEC (n = 5, P <0.05; Fig. 3 A). Furthermore, in the presence of SDF-1, there was a significant increase in the adhesion of MKs to BMEC monolayers (n = 5, P <0.05; Fig. 3 A).
|
MK transmigration through IL-1-stimulated BMEC is
dependent on E-selectin. To determine whether adhesion
molecules expressed on BMEC or MKs are critical for
transendothelial migration of mature MKs, ex vivo-
expanded MKs were placed in the upper chamber of transwells coated with confluent monolayers of resting or IL-1
-stimulated BMEC with and without blocking mAb to
various known inducible endothelial cell adhesion molecules, including ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and E-selectin. Activation of BMEC monolayers with IL-1
resulted in a
threefold increase in the migration of MKs in response to SDF-1 (n = 4, P <0.01; Fig. 3 B). Blocking mAb to endothelial cell-specific adhesion molecule E-selectin, but not
VCAM-1 or ICAM1, blocked the migration of MKs by
50%, suggesting that cellular interaction of MKs with
BMEC monolayers is critical for the migration of MKs (n = 5, P <0.05). The addition of a combination of mAbs to
VCAM-1, ICAM-1, and E-selectin did not block the migration of MKs beyond that originally blocked by
E-selectin mAb (n = 4, P >0.05; data not shown).
Migration of MKs through BMEC was associated with profound morphological changes in MKs, including unilateral pseudopodia formation (Fig. 4 A). Light microscopy of the transmigrated Wright/Giemsa-stained MKs showed a predominance of intact polyploid MKs, suggesting that polyploid MKs preferentially express CXCR4 and migrate in response to SDF-1. Ploidy analysis of transmigrating MKs in response to SDF-1 (200 ng/ml) through the 5-µm pore showed preferential migration of polyploid (>2, 4, 8, and 16N; n = 4, P <0.05) MKs (Fig. 4).
|
Transmigration of MKs through BMEC in response to SDF-1 results in formation of functional platelets. MKs that migrated through BMEC monolayers in response to SDF-1 (200 ng/ml) showed rapid fragmentation into platelets. Flow cytometry analysis of the CD41a+ platelets generated from migrated MKs showed the typical forward and side scatter pattern of in vivo-generated platelets (Fig. 5 A). In addition, platelets generated from migrated MKs were functional since they expressed P-selectin (CD62P) in response to thrombin stimulation (Fig. 5 C). In addition, all migrated platelets demonstrated strong expression of CXCR4 (Fig. 5 D).
|
Quantification of platelets derived from MKs migrated either through bare transwells or BMEC monolayers in response to SDF-1 demonstrated significantly higher numbers of platelets generated from MKs migrating through BMEC monolayers (n = 3, P <0.05; Fig. 5 B). During this period, there was no detectable platelet formation by MKs that were not exposed to SDF-1. In addition, SDF-1 alone without BMEC coculture did not enhance platelet formation, nor were nonmigrating MKs, exposed to SDF-1 but remaining on the apical surface of BMEC monolayers, able to produce any significant numbers of platelets. These data suggest that interaction of MKs with BMEC in response to SDF-1 is critical for induction of signaling pathways that may induce generation of platelets.
Electron microscopy of the cells in the lower chamber of the transwells recovered 3 h after transmigration in response to SDF-1 showed the presence of large polyploid MKs (Fig. 6 A), demonstrating that SDF-1 induces the transendothelial migration of whole intact MKs. In addition, electron microscopy of cells in the lower chamber 12 h after transendothelial migration demonstrated the presence of MKs in the process of fragmentation into platelets (Fig. 6 B). These data demonstrate that SDF-1 induces rapid migration (3-5 h) of intact polyploid MKs through BMEC, followed by fragmentation of MKs into platelets within 12-24 h after migration.
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Despite the discovery of TPO, the site and mechanism
of platelet formation are not well defined. Several lines of
evidence suggest that mature polyploid MKs have the capacity to transmigrate through BMEC and release platelets
within the bone marrow sinusoidal space or the lung capillaries. In search for chemokines that may induce transmigration of MKs through BMEC, we have discovered that
mature polyploid MKs express the chemokine receptor
CXCR4. In response to SDF-1, MKs transmigrate through
bare transwells as well as BMEC monolayers. The ED50 for
the transmigration of MKs is 125 pmol/liter, suggesting
that SDF-1 is a potent chemotactic factor for human MKs.
Monocytes and lymphocytes have been shown to transmigrate
through endothelial cells in response to various chemokines,
including SDF-1, MCP-1, MIP-1 and
, and IL-8. However, among the known factors that may potentially influence MK function and induce chemotaxis, including TPO,
VEGF, KL, IL-6, IL-11, and myriad other CXC or CC
chemokines, only SDF-1 induced transmigration of MKs.
The majority of the transmigrated MKs were large polyploid mature CD41a+CD42b+ MKs, suggesting that expression of CXCR4 by mature MKs may initiate cellular
signaling pathways that in turn initiate the process of migration and platelet formation. Interaction of MKs with
BMEC is critical, since adhesion molecules expressed on
the BMEC monolayers seem to play a crucial role in regulating the migration of MKs through endothelial cell junctions. Many studies have shown that BMEC in vivo assume
the phenotype of activated endothelium and constitutively
express low levels of VCAM-1 and E-selectin (37). In addition, mature MKs are capable of producing physiological levels of stimulatory cytokines, including IL-1 (38). In
this regard, in order to mimic the in vivo phenotype of
BMEC, BMEC monolayers were activated with IL-1
. Activation of BMEC results in the upregulation of adhesion
molecules, including E-selectin, VCAM-1, and ICAM-1.
Activation of BMEC with IL-1
not only increased the
number of BMEC-bound MKs, it also significantly increased the number of migrating MKs. In addition, migration of
MKs through activated BMEC was partially blocked by
neutralizing mAb to E-selectin, but not to VCAM-1 or
ICAM-1. This finding demonstrates that migration of MKs
is not a random process, and involves sequential interaction of mature MKs with specific adhesion molecules on endothelial cells. These series of events may facilitate egress of
MKs and initiate platelet release.
Blocking mAb to VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 did not significantly block the migration of MKs. Furthermore, a combination of neutralizing mAbs to VCAM-1, ICAM-1, and E-selectin did not block the migration of MKs beyond that originally blocked by E-selectin mAb. E-selectin expressed by activated endothelial cells seems to play a role in the tethering of leukocytes. In addition, engagement of E-selectin with its ligand has been shown to result in inside-out signaling (39, 40). Therefore, it is possible that engagement of E-selectin results in activation of signaling pathways that mobilize MKs for migration.
Based on the data presented in this paper, ~75% of day
12 to day 14-expanded MKs express CXCR4. IL-1 stimulation of BMEC monolayers induces migration of up to
45 ± 5% of the MKs. However, since close to 25% of
CXCR4+ MKs do not migrate, it is possible that either another factor is needed for migration or not all CXCR4+
MKs express the appropriate adhesion molecules. Therefore, based on these data we can infer that the mere functional expression of CXCR4 on MKs is not sufficient for
migration, but that attachment through the appropriate adhesion molecules or stimulation by an as yet unrecognized
chemokine is critical for transendothelial migration.
Although transmigration of MKs through bare transwells or BMEC was rapid (3-5 h), platelet generation took place maximally 24-48 h after migration. However, compared with bare transwell plates, migration of MKs through BMEC resulted in higher numbers of functional platelets, suggesting that collective interaction of MKs with BMEC and SDF-1 is critical for optimal platelet production.
However, both flow cytometric and electron microscopic analyses of transmigrated MKs demonstrated that even after 48 h, close to 20% of MKs remained intact, without any indication of generating platelets. These data suggest that CXCR4 may be expressed on polyploid MKs at different stages of maturation. However, the more mature MKs will give rise to platelets immediately after migration, whereas the less mature may migrate and give rise to platelets after the process of platelet compartmentalization has been completed. Therefore, it is conceivable that these relatively immature MKs, not having enough time within the sinusoidal space to release platelets, may travel to the lungs and stochastically release platelets in the lung capillaries.
SDF-1 induces a significant increase in the adhesion of mature MKs to resting or activated endothelial cells, suggesting that SDF-1 may either modulate the adhesion molecule repertoire in the MKs, or indirectly modulate endothelial cell adhesion molecule expression. Recently it has been shown that endothelial cells also express CXCR4 (41). However, to date we have been unable to demonstrate that SDF-1 has any effect on the adhesion molecule repertoire of BMEC. Therefore, it is likely that SDF-1 may directly regulate adhesion molecule repertoire on MKs.
CXCR4 is a coreceptor for T-tropic HIV strains, and has been shown to mediate HIV entry into T cells in the presence of CD4 (42, 43). It has also been demonstrated that the mAb (12G5) directed to CXCR4 can inhibit HIV entry into cells (33, 44, 45). Furthermore, some subsets of patients with HIV infection have been shown to have profound thrombocytopenia on initial clinical presentation. Soluble gp120 from T-tropic HIV has also been shown recently to induce apoptosis in human neurons or to be chemotactic for T cells (J. Hesselgesser, unpublished data). Based on the data presented here, it is possible that thrombocytopenia in patients with HIV may be due to direct entry of HIV into MKs via CXCR4. It also conceivable that direct interaction of soluble gp120 with CXCR4 on MK cells could induce apoptosis. This may result in dysregulation of chemotaxis of MKs and disruption of platelet production.
Based on our results, in order for SDF-1 to induce migration of mature MKs in vivo, SDF-1 concentration has to be much higher within the sinusoidal space than in the bone marrow microenvironment. In fact, most studies have shown that SDF-1 is produced by bone marrow stromal cells, including bone marrow fibroblasts such as the MS5 murine fibroblastic cell line (26). Given that heparin significantly blocked SDF-1 activity, it is conceivable that SDF-1 produced within the bone marrow microenvironment, particularly in the vicinity of the BMEC, is functionally inactive. Therefore, assuming that SDF-1 within the sinusoidal space may exist in an unbound form, this could produce a functional gradient resulting in selective migration of MKs from the bone marrow microenvironment to the sinusoidal space.
On average, on day 12 of ex vivo expansion, 57 ± 5% of cells derived from expansion of CB CD34+ cells in the presence of TPO and KL were MKs expressing CD41a+ cells. We have tried to purify MKs from ex vivo-expanded cells by flow cytometric cell sorting or elutriation. However, given the fragile nature of polyploid MKs, any manipulation of ex vivo-expanded MKs results in significant loss of mature polyploid MKs. In addition, we have found that in contrast to CD34+, T, or dendritic cells, minor physical manipulation of MKs by multiple centrifugation results in random disintegration into platelet-like particles, nonspecific calcium fluxes, and loss of response to SDF-1. Therefore, in the experiments described in this paper, we have used day 12 to 14 ex vivo-expanded MKs with minimal physical manipulation. This step has remarkably enhanced the yield of intact viable MKs that can effectively be used in migration studies.
Our data suggest that MKs may release platelets during transmigration through BMEC or after exiting through BMEC. SDF-1 induces transendothelial migration of MKs, suggesting that MKs have the capacity to release platelets during transmigration or after exiting the bone marrow. Therefore, expression of CXCR4 by mature MKs may be the critical cellular signal for transmigration of MKs and platelet formation. The cellular signaling pathways activated as the result of transendothelial MK migration that may mediate platelet formation are the subject of ongoing experiments.
![]() |
Footnotes |
---|
Address correspondence to Shahin Rafii, Cornell University Medical College, Hematology-Oncology Division, 1300 York Ave., Rm. C-616, New York, NY 10021. Phone: 212-746-2070; Fax: 212-746-8866; E-mail: srafii{at}mail.med.cornell.edu
Received for publication 4 March 1998 and in revised form 5 May 1998.
S. Rafii is supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grants R01-HL-58707-01 and R01-HL-61849-01, the Dorothy Rodbell Foundation for Sarcoma Research, and the Rich Foundation. M.A.S. Moore is supported by the National Cancer Institute grant CA-08748, and the Gar Reichman Fund of the Cancer Research Institute. R. Möhle is supported by grants from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bonn, Germany (SFB510).We are grateful to Dr. George Lam, Barbara Ferris, Diana Ngok, and Maureen Sullivan for expert technical support and helpful discussions.
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
1. | Kaushansky, K., S. Lok, R.D. Holly, V.C. Broudy, N. Lin, M.C. Bailey, J.W. Forstrom, M.M. Buddle, P.J. Oort, F.S. Hagen, et al . 1994. Promotion of megakaryocyte progenitor expansion and differentiation by the c-Mpl ligand thrombopoietin. Nature. 369: 568-571 [Medline]. |
2. | Wendling, F., E. Maraskovsky, N. Debili, C. Florindo, M. Teepe, M. Titeux, N. Methia, J. Breton-Gorius, D. Cosman, and W. Vainchenker. 1994. cMpl ligand is a humoral regulator of megakaryocytopoiesis. Nature. 369: 571-574 [Medline]. |
3. |
Zucker-Franklin, D., and
K. Kaushansky.
1996.
Effect of
thrombopoietin on the development of megakaryocytes and
platelets: an ultrastructural analysis.
Blood.
88:
1632-1638
|
4. | Kaushansky, K., V.C. Broudy, N. Lin, M.J. Jorgensen, J. McCarty, N. Fox, D. Zucker-Franklin, and C. Lofton-Day. 1995. Thrombopoietin, the Mp1 ligand, is essential for full megakaryocyte development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 92: 3234-3238 [Abstract]. |
5. | de Sauvage, F.J., K. Carver-Moore, S.M. Luoh, A. Ryan, M. Dowd, D.L. Eaton, and M.W. Moore. 1996. Physiological regulation of early and late stages of megakaryocytopoiesis by thrombopoietin. J. Exp. Med. 183: 651-656 [Abstract]. |
6. |
Bunting, S.,
R. Widmer,
T. Lipari,
L. Rangell,
H. Steinmetz,
K. Carver-Moore,
M.W. Moore,
G.A. Keller, and
F.J. de Sauvage.
1997.
Normal platelets and megakaryocytes are produced
in vivo in the absence of thrombopoietin.
Blood.
90:
3423-3429
|
7. | Shivdasani, R.A., M.F. Rosenblatt, D. Zucker-Franklin, C.W. Jackson, P. Hunt, C.J. Saris, and S.H. Orkin. 1995. Transcription factor NF-E2 is required for platelet formation independent of the actions of thrombopoietin/MGDF in megakaryocyte development. Cell. 81: 695-704 [Medline]. |
8. |
Shivdasani, R.A.,
P. Fielder,
G.A. Keller,
S.H. Orkin, and
F.J. de Sauvage.
1997.
Regulation of the serum concentration of thrombopoietin in thrombocytopenic NF-E2 knockout mice.
Blood.
90:
1821-1827
|
9. |
Nagahisa, H.,
Y. Nagata,
T. Ohnuki,
M. Osada,
T. Nagasawa,
T. Abe, and
K. Todokoro.
1996.
Bone marrow stromal cells
produce thrombopoietin and stimulate megakaryocyte growth
and maturation but suppress proplatelet formation.
Blood.
87:
1309-1316
|
10. | Tavassoli, M., and M. Aoki. 1989. Localization of megakaryocytes in the bone marrow. Blood Cells. 15: 3-14 [Medline]. |
11. | Lichtman, M.A., J.K. Chamberlain, W. Simon, and P.A. Santillo. 1978. Parasinusoidal location of megakaryocytes in marrow: a determinant of platelet release. Am. J. Hematol. 4: 303-312 [Medline]. |
12. | Levine, R.F., A. Eldor, E. HyAm, H. Gamliel, Z. Fuks, and I. Vlodavsky. 1985. Megakaryocyte interaction with subendothelial extracellular matrix is associated with adhesion, platelet-like shape change, and thromboxane A2 production. Blood. 66: 570-576 [Abstract]. |
13. | Radley, J.M., and G. Scurfield. 1980. The mechanism of platelet release. Blood. 56: 996-999 [Abstract]. |
14. | Zucker-Franklin, D., C. Stahl, and P. Hyde. 1987. Megakaryocyte ultrastructure. Its relationship to normal and pathologic thrombocytopoiesis. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 509: 25-33 [Medline]. |
15. | Leven, R.M.. 1987. Megakaryocyte motility and platelet formation. Scanning Microsc. 1: 1701-1709 [Medline]. |
16. | Caine, Y.G., I. Vlodavsky, M. Hersh, A. Polliack, D. Gurfel, R. Or, R.F. Levine, and A. Eldor. 1986. Adhesion, spreading and fragmentation of human megakaryocytes exposed to subendothelial extracellular matrix: a scanning electron microscopy study. Scan. Electron Microsc. Pt. 3:1087-1094. |
17. | Avraham, H., S. Cowley, S.Y. Chi, S. Jiang, and J.E. Groopman. 1993. Characterization of adhesive interactions between human endothelial cells and megakaryocytes. J. Clin. Invest. 91: 2378-2384 [Medline]. |
18. | Hagiwara, T., T. Nagasawa, H. Nagahisa, M. Takizawa, M. Osada, and T. Abe. 1996. Expression of adhesion molecules on cytoplasmic processes of human megakaryocytes. Exp. Hematol. 24: 690-695 [Medline]. |
19. | Tavassoli, M., and M. Aoki. 1981. Migration of entire megakaryocytes through the marrow-blood barrier. Br. J. Haematol. 48: 25-29 [Medline]. |
20. | Martin, J.F., D.N. Slater, and E.A. Trowbridge. 1983. Abnormal intrapulmonary platelet production: a possible cause of vascular and lung disease. Lancet. 1: 793-796 [Medline]. |
21. | Levine, R.F., A. Eldor, P.K. Shoff, S. Kirwin, D. Tenza, and E.M. Cramer. 1993. Circulating megakaryocytes: delivery of large numbers of intact, mature megakaryocytes to the lungs. Eur. J. Haematol. 51: 233-246 [Medline]. |
22. | Davis, R.E., P.E. Stenberg, J. Levin, and J.H. Beckstead. 1997. Localization of megakaryocytes in normal mice and following administration of platelet antiserum, 5-fluorouracil, or radiostrontium: evidence for the site of platelet production. Exp. Hematol. 25: 638-648 [Medline]. |
23. | Gewirtz, A.M., B. Calabretta, B. Rucinski, S. Niewiarowski, and W.Y. Xu. 1989. Inhibition of human megakaryocytopoiesis in vitro by platelet factor 4 (PF4) and a synthetic COOH-terminal PF4 peptide. J. Clin. Invest. 83: 1477-1486 [Medline]. |
24. | Han, Z.C., L. Sensebe, J.F. Abgrall, and J. Briere. 1990. Platelet factor 4 inhibits human megakaryocytopoiesis in vitro. Blood. 75: 1234-1239 [Abstract]. |
25. | Gewirtz, A.M., M. Keefer, R. Bien, and K.F. Mangan. 1986. Cellular regulation of human megakaryocytopoiesis in vitro. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 215: 129-135 [Medline]. |
26. | Bleul, C.C., R.C. Fuhlbrigge, J.M. Casasnovas, A. Aiuti, and T.A. Springer. 1996. A highly efficacious lymphocyte chemoattractant, stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1). J. Exp. Med. 184: 1101-1109 [Abstract]. |
27. | D'Apuzzo, M., A. Rolink, M. Loetscher, J.A. Hoxie, I. Clark-Lewis, F. Melchers, M. Baggiolini, and B. Moser. 1997. The chemokine SDF-1, stromal cell-derived factor 1, attracts early stage B cell precursors via the chemokine receptor CXCR4. Eur. J. Immunol. 27: 1788-1793 [Medline]. |
28. |
Aiuti, A.,
I.J. Webb,
C. Bleul,
T. Springer, and
J.C. Gutierrez-Ramos.
1997.
The chemokine SDF-1 is a chemoattractant for
human CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells and provides a
new mechanism to explain the mobilization of CD34+ progenitors to peripheral blood.
J. Exp. Med.
185:
111-120
|
29. |
Kim, C.H., and
H.E. Broxmeyer.
1998.
In vitro behaviour of
hematopoietic progenitor cells under the influence of chemoattractants: stromal cell-derived factor-1, steel factor, and the
bone marrow environment.
Blood.
91:
100-110
|
30. | Nagasawa, T., S. Hirota, K. Tachibana, N. Takakura, S. Nishikawa, Y. Kitamura, N. Yoshida, H. Kikutani, and T. Kishimoto. 1996. Defects of B-cell lymphopoiesis and bone-marrow myelopoiesis in mice lacking the CXC chemokine PBSF/SDF-1. Nature. 382: 635-638 [Medline]. |
31. |
Rafii, S.,
F. Shapiro,
J. Rimarachin,
R.L. Nachman,
B. Ferris,
B. Weksler,
M.A. Moore, and
A.S. Asch.
1994.
Isolation and characterization of human bone marrow microvascular endothelial
cells: hematopoietic progenitor cell adhesion.
Blood.
84:
10-19
|
32. |
Mohle, R.,
M.A. Moore,
R.L. Nachman, and
S. Rafii.
1997.
Transendothelial migration of CD34+ and mature hematopoietic cells: an in vitro study using a human bone marrow
endothelial cell line.
Blood.
89:
72-80
|
33. | Endres, M.J., P.R. Clapham, M. Marsh, M. Ahuja, J.D. Turner, A. McKnight, J.F. Thomas, B. Stoebenau-Haggarty, S. Choe, P.J. Vance, et al . 1996. CD4-independent infection by HIV-2 is mediated by fusin/CXCR4. Cell. 87: 745-756 [Medline]. |
34. |
Mohle, R.,
D. Green,
M.A. Moore,
R.L. Nachman, and
S. Rafii.
1997.
Constitutive production and thrombin-induced
release of vascular endothelial growth factor by human megakaryocytes and platelets.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.
94:
663-668
|
35. | Avraham, H., E. Vannier, S. Cowley, S.X. Jiang, S. Chi, C.A. Dinarello, K.M. Zsebo, and J.E. Groopman. 1992. Effects of the stem cell factor, c-kit ligand, on human megakaryocytic cells. Blood. 79: 365-371 [Abstract]. |
36. |
Barleon, B.,
S. Sozzani,
D. Zhou,
H.A. Weich,
A. Mantovani, and
D. Marme.
1996.
Migration of human monocytes
in response to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is
mediated via VEGF receptor flt-1.
Blood.
87:
3336-3343
|
37. | Schweitzer, K.M., A.M. Drager, P. van der Valk, A. Zevenbergen, A.P. Theijsmeijer, C.E. van der Schoot, and M.M. Langenhuijsen. 1996. Constitutive expression of E-selectin and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 on endothelial cells of hematopoietic tissues. Am. J. Pathol. 148: 165-175 [Abstract]. |
38. | Avraham, H.. 1993. Regulation of megakaryocytopoiesis. Stem Cells (Dayton). 11: 499-510 [Abstract]. |
39. | Steegmaier, M., A. Levinovitz, S. Isenmann, E. Borges, M. Lenter, H.P. Kocher, B. Kleuser, and D. Vestweber. 1995. The E-selectin-ligand ESL-1 is a variant of a receptor for fibroblast growth factor. Nature. 373: 615-620 [Medline]. |
40. | Bevilacqua, M.P.. 1993. Endothelial-leukocyte adhesion molecules. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 11: 767-804 [Medline]. |
41. |
Gupta, K.S.,
G.P. Lysko,
K. Pillarisetti,
E. Ohlstein, and
J.M. Stadel.
1998.
Chemokine receptors in human endothelial
cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:
4282-4287
|
42. | Bleul, C.C., M. Farzan, H. Choe, C. Parolin, I. Clark-Lewis, J. Sodroski, and T.A. Springer. 1996. The lymphocyte chemoattractant SDF-1 is a ligand for LESTR/fusin and blocks HIV-1 entry. Nature. 382: 829-833 [Medline]. |
43. |
Bleul, C.C.,
L. Wu,
J.A. Hoxie,
T.A. Springer, and
C.R. Mackay.
1997.
The HIV coreceptors CXCR4 and CCR5
are differentially expressed and regulated on human T lymphocytes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.
94:
1925-1930
|
44. | Hesselgesser, J., M. Halks-Miller, V. Del Vecchio, S.C. Peiper, J. Hoxie, D.L. Kolson, D. Taub, and R. Horuk. 1997. CD4-independent association between HIV-1 gp120 and CXCR4: functional chemokine receptors are expressed in human neurons. Curr. Biol. 7: 112-121 [Medline]. |
45. | Strizki, J.M., J.D. Turner, R.G. Collman, J. Hoxie, and F. Gonzalez-Scarano. 1997. A monoclonal antibody (12G5) directed against CXCR-4 inhibits infection with the dual-tropic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolate HIV-1(89.6) but not the T-tropic isolate HIV-1(HxB). J. Virol. 71: 5678-5683 [Abstract]. |