Comparative energetics during early development of two marine fish species, Solea senegalensis (Kaup) and Sparus aurata (L.)
Instituto de Ciencias, Marinas de Andalucía, CSIC, Apartado Oficial s/n, Puerto Real, E-11510 Cádiz, Spain
* Present address: Dept. Biología Animal, Vegetal y Ecología, Universidad de Jaén, Paraje de las Lagunillas s/n, 23071 Jaén, Spain
Author for correspondence (e-mail: manuel.yufera{at}icman.csic.es)
Accepted April 2, 2001
![]() |
Summary |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: fish, larva, larval growth, energetic efficiency, ingestion rate, respiration rate, Senegal sole, Solea senegalensis, gilthead seabream, Sparus aurata.
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Although there is very little information about these larval stages in nature, rearing procedures in the laboratory for both species are similar and well standardised during the first stages of development. Both species spawn eggs with a similar diameter (approximately 1mm) and energy content (approximately 1J) (Pascual and Yúfera, 1993; Yúfera et al., 1999). However, under similar rearing conditions, it is usual to obtain gilthead seabream larvae of around 500700µg dry mass (DM) with a 1520% survival rate at the end of the first month of culture, while Senegal sole larvae reach a dry mass of 20002500µg and show a survival rate of over 80% during the same period. These similarities in the starting conditions and differences in the potential for growth provide a chance to compare the two patterns of development from the point of view of the transformation of matter and energy. Some aspects of metabolism during the egg, yolk and first feeding phases in these species have been examined in previous studies (Parra et al., 1999; Yúfera et al., 1999; Parra and Yúfera 2000). In the present study, the energetic balance and the energy allocation during the first month of larval development of the two species have been measured under laboratory conditions to examine the mechanisms that control differential growth in larval marine fish.
![]() |
Materials and methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Growth, ingestion and respiration patterns were obtained from pooled data using different egg batches obtained over several years. Larvae for analyses were sampled periodically during the experimental period and anaesthetised with 200p.p.m. of ethyl-4-amino-benzoate. Body dry mass was determined by drying samples of approximately 1530 larvae at 85°C to constant mass. The accuracy of the method was previously checked by comparison with freeze-dried samples. Specific growth rate (G) was calculated as the slope of the exponential regression of larval body dry mass on time. Energy content was determined using a semimicro bomb calorimeter (Parr 1421) using samples weighing approximately 20mg. Three subsamples per determination were used in each case. Energy employed in growth (Ge) was calculated using the larval energy content and the daily dry mass increase. Mouth width (Wm) and total length (TL) in Senegal sole larvae during development were measured as described by Hunter (Hunter, 1981) and Yúfera et al. (Yúfera et al., 1993a) respectively. The Wm pattern as a function of TL in Senegal sole was compared with data for gilthead seabream taken from Fernández-Díaz et al. (Fernández-Díaz et al., 1994).
Ingestion rate of fish larvae was determined directly in the rearing tanks. Ingestion during the rotifer-feeding period was determined using the method of Yúfera et al. (Yúfera et al., 1993b) and Parra and Yúfera (Parra and Yúfera, 2000). Approximately 2030 larvae were sampled periodically (every 5, 10 or 15min) over a period of 2 or 4h depending on larval age, and then anaesthetised with ethyl-4-amino-benzoate. The larvae were examined under a light microscope to examine the gut contents. This method is based on the use of green-coloured rotifers by means of a short re-feeding period in a dense suspension of microalgae cells. These green rotifers can be distinguished from those that have been in the rearing tanks for several hours, because the latter appear brown. The fullness of the gut follows an asymptotic function:
![]() | (1) |
where C is the number of green rotifers (per larva showing gut contents), Cmax is the asymptote of the curve (rotiferslarva-1), T is time (h) and b is a regression parameter that indicates the instantaneous rate of gut filling (h-1). This model was fitted by the iterative method to the asymptotic function. The ingestion rate (I) was calculated as the derivative of this function against time at the starting point, when no green rotifers had yet been evacuated:
![]() | (2) |
During the Artemia-feeding period, the ingestion rate was calculated from the decrease in prey density (Yúfera and Rodríguez, 1987) using the equation:
![]() | (3) |
where D is the decreasing rate of prey number in the water calculated as the slope of the exponential regression of prey density on time, Cx is the geometric mean of the initial and final prey concentrations and L is the density of larvae in the water.
In both cases, ingestion rate was expressed as dry mass ingested per larva per day, I (µglarva-1day-1). Values of rotifer dry mass and energy content used for the calculations were determined as a function of the egg/female ratio observed in the larval gut (Yúfera et al., 1997). The dry mass and energy content of recently hatched Artemia nauplii were calculated in the present study (dry mass 2.5±0.2µg; energy content 21.3±0.2Jmg-1; means ± S.D., N=3). The energy ingested (Ie) was calculated from the ingestion rates and the energy content of the prey.
Rates of oxygen consumption (V.O2) were measured in a respiratory chamber equipped with a polarographic oxygen sensor. The electrode was attached to a dissolved oxygen meter (Strathkelvin Instruments model 781b with 1302 oxygen electrode). The output was wired via a data-acquisition board (Metrabyte DAS8-PGA) to a PC program used for continuous data logging. The Weiss equation was used to estimate oxygen solubility with respect to temperature and salinity (Weiss, 1970). After a 515min equilibration period, the electrode stabilised, and oxygen concentration declined at a constant rate. V.O2 was estimated as the slope of the regression line of oxygen concentration on time for 12h following electrode stabilisation. Sterilised and air-saturated sea water (salinity 33) was used. The respiratory chamber was kept at a constant temperature of 19.50±0.05°C in accordance with the temperature of well water used for larval rearing studies in our Institute from 1986. The water volume in the respiratory chamber was chosen according to the number and size of the larvae and ranged between 3 and 5ml. The larvae were held without food in the chamber, but they had been held under normal rearing conditions in the tanks prior to measurements. When the larvae died inside the chamber, the data were excluded. V.O2 was calculated in nmolO2larva-1h-1. The energy expended in metabolic processes (Me) was calculated using V.O2 and the oxycalorific coefficient (13.56Jmg-1drymass) (from Brett and Groves, 1979) for conversion into energy units. Energetic efficiencies were calculated using the energy ingested (Ie), the energy employed in growth (Ge) and the metabolic energy (Me) (Table1).
|
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The ingestion pattern during the first month was also different in the two species. Nevertheless, both species exhibited a similar trend when compared over the same range of larval dry mass. Surprisingly, the amount of ingested matter for a given larval size was always lower in Senegal sole. Although some flatfish species stop feeding during metamorphosis (Tanaka et al., 1996), Senegal sole continue to eat during the transformation, but the total daily amount ingested remains almost constant during this stage in spite of the fact that the body continues to grow. The slight decrease in specific ingestion rate is compensated by the energetic reserves that have been accumulated during the larval period. After the start of feeding, the carbon content and energy content of the larval tissues of Senegal sole increase progressively and reach relatively elevated values for marine fish larvae (Yúfera et al., 1999). The present study shows that these reserves are used during metamorphosis. A decrease in carbon, energy and lipid content in larval tissues during the transformation has been observed in Pleuronectes platessa (Christensen and Korsgaard, 1999) and in other species (Youson, 1988). Senegal sole start feeding earlier and feed faster than gilthead seabream. A few hours after the opening of the mouth, all sole larvae from the same egg batch are eating, whereas seabream larvae require several days to reach 100% feeding activity in the population (Parra and Yúfera, 2000). In addition, sole larvae possess an anatomical feature that appears to be of primary importance to mass gain, a wider mouth, which allows them to ingest larger-sized prey and, consequently, to obtain a higher energy input per prey item consumed. Therefore, the energetic balance between expended and ingested energy during the process of catching and ingestion is more favourable for Senegal sole than for gilthead seabream during early development.
Gilthead seabream and Senegal sole are species that live in temperate habitats. During the larval stages, both species grow continuously in the presence of prey. In contrast, several hours of starvation causes an immediate cessation of growth and poor larval health. In the absence of prey, the larvae tend to retain ingested food in the gut. Therefore, respiration experiments were performed with individuals with gut contents, and we assumed that our measurements represented routine metabolic rate plus specific dynamic action. This metabolic status is assumed to be continuous in larvae under rearing condition (Parra and Yúfera, 2000).
The metabolic rate (V.O2) of gilthead seabream larvae during the first month of life increased isometrically with larval mass (mass exponent b=0.99). This value is quite close to that found in Sparus aurata larvae by Quantz and Tandler (Quantz and Tandler, 1984) and by us in a previous study (Parra and Yúfera, 2000). It has been suggested that this exponent is close to unity in the early stages of development of marine fish larvae (Wieser, 1995), although reported values in different species are quite variable (Walsh et al., 1989; Oikawa et al., 1991). In juveniles and adults, this relationship between metabolic rate and body mass is allometric, and the mass exponents for regression of metabolic rate on body mass are usually less than 1. This decrease is associated with a progressive increase in mass of structural tissues with low metabolic activity (bones, scales, etc.) (Oikawa et al., 1991; Segner et al., 1994). Brett and Groves (Brett and Groves, 1979) suggested that the average value for this mass exponent in fish was 0.86. In Senegal sole, the metabolic rate during the pelagic period also scales isometrically with body mass (b=1.06), as has been reported for the closely related species Solea solea (Day and Jones, 1996). However, the value of b calculated for Solea senegalensis with a dry mass of 1501500µg does not correspond with those of larvae and adults. The relatively low metabolic demand observed during all or part of metamorphosis could be a way to save energy. This kind of response has also been described for Pseudopleuronectes americanus during metamorphosis (Laurence, 1975) and for Paralichthys olivaceus (Kurokura et al., 1995). Although not as pronounced as in flatfish, a switch in metabolic demand during early development at the beginning of metamorphosis has also been observed in other fish species (Appelbaum and Kamler, 2000). This pattern of energy allocation allows Senegal sole larvae to develop the differentiation processes associated with metamorphosis and to continue growing, even with a lower energy intake per unit of biomass. Nevertheless, a limitation in energy intake prevents growth and the completion of transformation (Fernández-Díaz et al., 2001).
Houde and Zastrow (Houde and Zastrow, 1993) reported average values of approximately 30% for K1 and 60% for A in fish larvae. However, there is inter- and intra-specific variability. In the present study and above a larval mass of 100µg, K1 ranged from approximately 15 to 35% in Solea senegalensis and from 4 to 7% in Sparus aurata and A ranged from 35 to 52% in Solea senegalensis and from 14 to 20% in Sparus aurata. Such values are, in general, low because the larvae were being reared under conditions of high prey density (Parra and Yúfera, 2000). The initial decline in K1 and A later switched to an increase, describing a U-shaped trend in relation to larval mass, during early development prior to metamorphosis. This pattern for K1 has also been observed in other fish larvae (Houde and Schekter, 1983; Yamashita and Bailey, 1989) and has been associated with changes in the ingestion rates and in the cost/benefit relationship of energy uptake (Checkley, 1984; Kiørboe et al., 1987; Theilacker, 1987; Tucker, 1989).
In the present study, the larvae of both species were reared under satiation conditions and under similar conditions of prey density to remove, as far as possible, the influence of feeding conditions. There was, however, some variation in the feeding regime because Artemia nauplii were offered earlier to sole larvae, although in terms of larval mass the difference was relatively small (80µg dry mass in sole larvae compared with 90µg dry mass in seabream larvae). In any case, considering the difficulties of measuring and simulating the potential optimum feeding conditions of larvae in nature, the approach has been to provide the best possible feeding conditions for each species in a realistic way to compare larvae growing in the laboratory. It is obvious that feeding behaviour and ability also differ in the two species, as explained above. This fact probably contributes to differences in the energy expended in searching for and handling prey and may, consequently, explain the differences in energy allocation.
In addition, survival during the first month was not considered in the calculation of biomass production. Therefore, the estimates presented here have to be considered at an individual level and out of an ecological context in which mortality by predation and prey quality and availability are important aspects of the metabolic response of a larval fish population. In any case, it is evident that Senegal sole invest more energy in growth than do gilthead seabream during the first developmental stages. It is worth noting that the percentage of assimilated energy used for growth is always higher than that used for metabolic processes in Solea senegalensis and that the opposite is true for Sparus aurata (Fig.7). Such variability in food conversion efficiency in larvae of species sharing resources and environmental conditions has also been observed in other species (Kneib and Parker, 1991).
There are some methodological constraints in the present study. As pointed out above, it is difficult to define and measure the routine metabolic rate of small fish larvae eating continuously. They have a high basal energy expenditure and low metabolic scope (Wieser and Medgyesy, 1990; Wieser, 1995). Faeces and energy expenditures in searching for food and in eating were not measured and were not considered in the calculation of assimilation efficiency. Therefore, the possible causes of the difference in K1 between Senegal sole and seabream require some consideration. After the opening of the mouth, larvae of both species exhibit low swimming activity. Sole larvae become progressively more active during the first days of feeding up to the point when they acquire a benthic habit and settle on the bottom 2 weeks later. Conversely, seabream larvae show active prey-searching behaviour only from approximately day 10 onwards. The same swimming behaviour was observed during the respiration experiments. Energy expenditure in searching tends to decrease with increasing prey concentration (Laurence, 1977). In the present study, under conditions of high prey density, feeding success depends largely on encounter opportunity rather than on searching effort. In addition, the energy expended in swimming and sucking during attack is very low compared with the energy supplied by the prey (Drost and van der Bogaart, 1986), although the gain in energy evidently increases with the size and energy content of the prey eaten. Therefore, although not measured, there could be assumed a priori to be some differences in foraging effort between the two species, but not excessive differences. Perhaps the main difference lies in the slow acquisition of prey-searching behaviour in seabream larvae, as explained above.
The other relevant factor involved in assimilation efficiency concerns the digestion process. Several studies indicate that growth and assimilation efficiencies decrease at high consumption rates (Boehlert and Yoklavich, 1984; Theilacker, 1987). Furthermore, marine fish larvae, like other plankton-feeders, show a range of feeding behaviours between two extreme strategies: (i) maximisation of ingestion with a short residence time in the digestive tract and a relatively low assimilation rate, or (ii) a low rate of ingestion with a long residence time in the gut and a high assimilation rate. Obviously, this point cannot be considered independently of the previous one because, under the same conditions of prey density, an increase in the number of ingested prey items would imply greater energy expenditure. Seabream larvae belong to the first group, and live rotifers within the gut and faeces could be easily observed during routine rearing. There are few observations for sole larvae, but it is a reasonable possibility that a relatively higher assimilation rate occurs. Only a more detailed study of the different compartments of metabolism and feeding physiology will answer these questions.
Both species start their development with similar amounts of energetic reserves, but after 30 days Senegal sole can weigh up to five times more than gilthead seabream under the same rearing conditions. Differences occurred over the entire experimental period, but mainly during the first 2 weeks. In that period, feeding behaviour and physiological processes promote fast development and growth in Senegal sole. Thus, Senegal sole are more efficient than gilthead seabream even during the endogenous feeding period, showing a higher efficiency of conversion of yolk into larval tissue (Yúfera et al., 1999). After the start of feeding during early development, sole larvae show a higher predatory capacity than seabream larvae, i.e. they are able to ingest larger prey and they presumably have a higher metabolic efficiency given the above-mentioned assumptions. This greater efficiency in utilizing the ingested energetic resources, and not a higher specific ingestion rate, is the main reason for the fast larval growth of the Senegal sole in comparison with the gilthead seabream.
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Appelbaum, S. and Kamler, E. (2000). Survival, growth, metabolism and behaviour of Clarias gariepinus (Burchell 1822) early stages under different light conditions. Aquacult. Eng. 22, 269287.
Arias, A. and Drake, P. (1990). Estados Juveniles de la Ictiofauna en los Caños de las Salinas de la Bahía de Cádiz. Cádiz: Inst. Ciencia Mar. Andalucía.
Bauchot, M. L. and Hureau, J. C. (1986). Sparidae. In Fishes of the North-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean, vol. II (ed. P. J. P. Whitehead, M. L. Bauchot, J. C. Hureau, J. Nielsen and E. Tortonese), pp. 883907. Bungay: UNESCO.
Boehlert, G. W. and Yoklavich, M. M. (1984). Carbon assimilation as a function of ingestion rate in larval Pacific herring, Clupea harengus pallasi. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 79, 251262.
Brett, J. R. and Groves, T. D. D. (1979). Physiological energetics. In Fish Physiology, vol. VIII, Bioenergetics and Growth (ed. W. S. Hoar and D. J. Randall), pp. 279344. New York: Academic Press.
Checkley, D. M. (1984). Relation of growth to ingestion for larvae of Atlantic herring Clupea harengus and other fish. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 18, 215224.
Christensen, M. N. and Korsgaard, B. (1999). Protein metabolism, growth and pigmentation pattern during metamorphosis of plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) larvae. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 237, 225241.
Day, O. J. and Jones, D. A. (1996). Food consumption, growth and respiration rate of sole, Solea solea (L.), during early ontogeny in a hatchery environment. Aquacult. Res. 27, 831839.
Drost, M. R. and van den Boogaart, J. G. M. (1986). The energetics of feeding strikes in larval carp, Cyprinus carpio. J. Fish Biol. 29, 371379.
Fernández-Díaz, C., Pascual, E. and Yúfera, M. (1994). Feeding behaviour and prey size selection of gilthead seabream, Sparus aurata, larvae fed on inert and live food. Mar. Biol. 118, 323328.
Fernández-Díaz, C., Yúfera, M., Cañavate, J. P., Moyano, F. J., Alarcón, F. J. and Díaz, M. (2001). Growth and physiological changes during metamorphosis of Senegal sole reared in the laboratory. J. Fish Biol. (in press).
Houde, E. D. and Sheckter, R. C. (1983). Oxygen uptake and comparative energetics among eggs and larvae of three subtropical marine fishes. Mar. Biol. 72, 283293.
Houde, E. D. and Zastrow, C. E. (1993). Ecosystem- and taxon-specific dynamic and energetics properties of larval fish assemblages. Bull. Mar. Sci. 53, 290335.
Hunter, J. R. (1981). Feeding ecology and predation in marine fish larvae. In Marine Fish Larvae. Morphology, Ecology and Relation to Fisheries (ed. E. Lasker), pp. 3477. Seattle: Washington Sea Grant Program.
Kiørboe, T., Munk, P. and Richarson, K. (1987). Respiration and growth of larval herring Clupea harengus: relation between specific dynamic action and growth efficiency. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 40, 110.
Kneib, R. T. and Parker, J. H. (1991). Gross conversion efficiencies of mummichog and spotfin killifish larvae from Georgia salt marsh. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 120, 803809.
Kurokura, H., Matsumoto, T., Namba, K. and Shigeru, A. (1995). Oxygen consumption of larval flounder Paralichthys olivaceus measured by an improved water bottle method. Fish. Sci. 61, 710.
Laurence, G. C. (1975). Laboratory growth and metabolism of the winter flounder Pseudopleuronectes americanus from hatching through metamorphosis at three temperatures. Mar. Biol. 32, 223229.
Laurence, G. C. (1977). A bioenergetic model for the analysis of feeding and survival potential of winter flounder Pseudopleuronectes americanus, larvae during the period from hatching to metamorphosis. Fish. Bull. U.S. 75, 529546.
Martínez, I., Moyano, F. J., Fernández-Díaz, C. and Yúfera, M. (1999). Digestive enzyme activity during larval development of the Senegal sole (Solea senegalensis). Fish Physiol. Biochem. 21, 317323.
Oikawa, S., Itazawa, Y. and Gotoh, M. (1991). Ontogenetic change in the relationship between metabolic rate and body mass in sea bream Pagrus major (Temminck and Schlegel). J. Fish Biol. 38, 483496.
Parra, G., Ronnestad, I. And Yúfera, M. (1999). Energy metabolism in eggs and larvae of the Senegal sole. J. Fish Biol. 55 (Suppl. A), 205214.
Parra, G. and Yúfera, M. (2000). Feeding, physiology and growth response in first-feeding gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.) larvae in relation to prey density. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 243, 115.
Pascual, E. and Yúfera, M. (1993). Energy content and chemical composition of gilthead seabream, Sparus aurata L., eggs. Aquacult. Fish. Magmnt. 24, 423429.
Person-Le Ruyet, J. and Verillaud, P. (1980). Techniques délevage intensif de la durade doreé (Sparus aurata (L.)) de la naissance à lage de deux mois. Aquaculture 20, 351370.
Quantz, G. and Tandler, A. (1984). The effect of weight and environmental temperature on the oxygen consumption of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.) larvae. Eur. Maricult. Soc. Spec. Publ. 6, 237248.
Quéro, J. C., Desoutter and Lagardère, F. (1986). Soleidae. In Fishes of the North-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean, vol. III (ed. P. J. P. Whitehead, M. L. Bauchot, J. C. Hureau, J. Nielsen and E. Tortonese), pp. 13081328. Bungay: UNESCO.
Ribeiro, L., Sarasquete, C. and Dinis, M. T. (1999). Histological and histochemical development of the digestive system of Solea senegalensis (Kaup, 1858) larvae. Aquaculture 171, 293308.
Segner, H., Storch, V., Reinecke, M., Kloas, W. and Hanke, W. (1994). The development of functional digestive and metabolic organs in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.). Mar. Biol. 119, 411486.
Tanaka, M., Kawai, S., Seikai, T. and Burke, J. S. (1996). Development of the digestive organ system in Japanese flounder in relation to metamorphosis and settlement. Mar. Freshwater Behav. Physiol. 28, 1931.
Tandler, A. and Helps, S. (1985). The effects of photoperiod and water exchange rate on growth and survival of gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata, Linnaeus; Sparidae) from hatching to metamorphosis in mass rearing systems. Aquaculture 48, 7182.
Theilacker, G. H. (1987). Feeding ecology and growth energetics of larval northern anchovy, Engraulis mordax. Fish. Bull. 85, 213228.
Tucker, J. W., Jr (1989). Energy utilization in Bay Anchovy, Anchoa mitchilli and Black Sea Bass, Centropristis striata, eggs and larvae. Fish. Bull. 87, 279293.
Walsh, W. A., Swanson, C., Lee, C.-E., Banno, J. E. and Eda, H. (1989). Oxygen consumption by eggs and larvae of striped mullet, Mugil cephalus, in relation to development, salinity and temperature. J. Fish Biol. 35, 347358.
Weiss, R. F. (1970). The solubility of nitrogen, oxygen and argon in water and seawater. Deep Sea Res. 17, 721735.
Wieser, W. (1995). Energetics of fish larvae, the smallest vertebrates. Acta Physiol. Scand. 154, 279290.[Medline]
Wieser, W. and Medgyesy, N. (1990). Cost and efficiency of growth in the larvae of two species of fish with widely differing metabolic rates. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 242, 5156.
Yamashita, Y. and Bailey, K. M. (1989). A laboratory study of bioenergetics of larval Walleye Pollock, Theragra chalcogramma. Fish. Bull. 87, 525536.
Youson, J. H. (1988). First metamorphosis. In Fish Physiology, vol. XI, part B (ed. W. S. Hoar and D. J. Randall), pp. 135196. New York: Academic Press.
Yúfera, M., Parra, G. and Pascual, E. (1997). Energy content of rotifers (Brachionus plicatilis and Brachionus rotundiformis in relation to temperature. Hydrobiologia 358, 8387.
Yúfera, M., Parra, G., Santiago, R. and Carrascosa, M. (1999). Growth, carbon, nitrogen and energy content of Solea senegalensis Kaup (Pisces, Soleidae) from egg fertilization to metamorphosis. Mar. Biol. 134, 4349.
Yúfera, M., Polo, A. and Pascual, E. (1993a). Changes in chemical composition and biomass during the transition from endogenous to exogenous feeding of Sparus aurata L. (Pisces, Sparidae) larvae reared in the laboratory. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 167, 149161.
Yúfera, M., Polo, A. and Pascual, E. (1993b). First results on feeding rates of Sparus aurata (L.). In Physiological and Biochemical Aspects of Fish Development (ed. B. T. Whalter and H. J. Fyhn), pp. 160166. Bergen: University of Bergen Press.
Yúfera, M. and Rodríguez, A. (1987). Aspectos metodológicos sobre el cálculo de las tasas de consumo de alimento en larvas de Decápodos. Inv. Pesq. 51 (Suppl. 1), 561569.
Zar, J. H. (1984). Biostatistical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.