Synthesis of the Signal Molecule Acetylcholine during the Developmental Cycle of PARAMECIUM PRIMAURELIA (Protista, Ciliophora) and its Possible Function in Conjugation
1 Department for the Study of the Territory and its Resources, University of Genoa, Corso Europa 26, I-16132 Genoa, Italy,
2 Department of Experimental, Environmental, and Applied Biology, University of Genoa, Viale Benedetto XV 5, I-16132 Genoa, Italy and
3 Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Animal Biology, University of Camerino, Via Camerini 2, I-62032 Camerino, Italy
*e-mail: corrado{at}dipteris.unige.it
Accepted March 9, 2001
![]() |
Summary |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: acetylcholine, choline acetyltransferase, mating type, cell-to-cell adhesion, conjugation, Paramecium primaurelia, Protista
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Previous studies have demonstrated the involvement of the surface glycosidic residues sialic acid (NeuAc) and N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) in the cell-to-cell adhesion process in P. primaurelia (Delmonte Corrado et al., 1997). However, the treatment of mt I and mt II cells with cholinomimetic drugs, either agonists or antagonists of acetylcholine (ACh) receptors, dramatically inhibited mating-cell pairing. This finding led to studies investigating both the presence of a cholinergic signalling system and its possible role in regulating cell interactions leading to cell-to-cell adhesion. It is known that the cholinergic system consists of a set of functionally related molecules, including the neurotransmitter ACh, its lytic enzyme acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and both its nicotinic (gating Na+ channels) and muscarinic (associated with the transduction cascade) receptors (Laasberg et al., 1987; Bonner, 1989; Stroud et al., 1990; Le Novere and Changeux, 1995). Signal molecules such as ACh have been shown to be involved in regulating cell interactions during cell-to-cell communication (Buznikov, 1990; Falugi, 1993), such as between gametes during fertilization (Baccetti et al., 1995). Using histochemical and immunocytochemical approaches, we showed for the first time that a ciliate protozoan possesses a complete set of molecules belonging to the cholinergic system, localized at the cell surface of mating-competent mt I and mt II cells (Trielli et al., 1997). True AChE activity, also detected in the cytoplasm of immature cells, was due to a 260kDa molecule similar to the membrane-bound tetrameric form found in human erythrocytes (Delmonte Corrado et al., 1999), indicating that this enzyme belongs to a cell signalling system acquired early in evolutionary history.
In this paper, we investigated the possible function of the signal molecule ACh in the conjugation of P. primaurelia. As reported previously, receptor-bound ACh is quantitatively and rapidly hydrolyzed by AChE (Dale, 1914), so its intracellular localization is difficult to demonstrate, especially in a non-nervous system such as Paramecium. Consequently, we attempted to detect the intracellular sites of ACh synthesis in P. primaurelia by localizing the ACh biosynthetic enzyme choline acetyltransferase (ChAT). ChAT catalyses the acetylation of choline by acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA) (Nachmansohn and Machado, 1943); the presence of ChAT has been reported in nervous tissues and in a wide variety of non-neuronal tissues (Mautner, 1986; Wessler et al., 1999). We assessed ChAT activity histochemically and the presence of ChAT-like molecules both immunocytochemically and using immunoblotting procedures.
Mature and suitably starved cells able to conjugate, referred to as mating-competent mt I and mt II cells, were examined together with mature cells unable to conjugate because of their well-fed conditions, referred to as non-mating-competent cells, and immature cells unable to conjugate even under appropriate conditions of starvation. Furthermore, to investigate the modulating activity of ACh in cell-to-cell adhesion, experiments were performed in which mating-competent cells, before mixing, were exposed to either AChE- or ChAT -specific inhibitors. The inhibition of AChE exerted by BW284c51 and eserine, which block enzyme activity by reacting with a specific serine residue within the catalytic centre (Kennedy, 1991), prevents AChE from cleaving ACh and leads to overproduction of ACh at its receptor sites (for a review, see Massoulié et al., 1993). Conversely, blockade of ChAT activity with Congo Red, known to be a potent competitive inhibitor of acetyl-CoA (Mautner et al., 1981), inhibits the synthesis of ACh, inducing a decrease in ACh levels.
![]() |
Materials and methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Cell lines re-isolated daily entered autogamy in response to depletion of their food supply. The products of the first post-autogamous fission were allowed to multiply separately and maintained in logarithmic growth phase under well-fed conditions. Autogamy is normally followed by the maturity phase; therefore, cells growing logarithmically were mature but unable to conjugate because of their well-fed conditions (non-mating-competent cells). At the transition from the logarithmic to the stationary growth phase, resulting from depletion of the food supply and leading to starving conditions, the cells became able to conjugate (mating-competent cells) and expressed their mating type. The mt, II or I, was revealed by the capacity of the cells to pair with stock P mt I or stock 90 mt II cells, respectively. Cells unable to conjugate under starving conditions (immature cells) were obtained by allowing the vegetative progeny originating from 90x90 crosses to multiply and to reach the stationary growth phase within the immaturity period that usually follows conjugation.
Immunocytochemical staining
To detect the presence of molecules immunologically related to ChAT (E.C.2.3.1.6.), mating-competent mt I and mt II cells, non-mating-competent cells and immature cells were fixed for 30min in 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1moll-1 phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH7.4) and transferred onto microscope slides. Incubation was performed using anti-human placenta ChAT polyclonal antibody AB143, raised in rabbit (Chemicon International Inc., Temecula, CA, USA) and diluted 1:250 in PBS, and was carried out for 2h at 37°C in a moist chamber. The samples were then rinsed in PBS and incubated with anti-rabbit secondary fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labelled antibody (Sigma, Milan, Italy), diluted 1:250 in PBS, for 3h at 37°C in a moist chamber in the dark. Controls were incubated with the secondary antibody only.
Confocal microscopy
We acquired optical sections using an optical confocal laser scanning microscope workstation (Bio-Rad M600) equipped with a krypton/argon laser and based on a Nikon Diaphot-TMD inverted microscope. Images were acquired by using a x60 apoplan objective (numerical aperture 1.4). A BHS filter (488nm) was used. The photomultiplier tube output and aperture were standardized to make the images as bright as possible against a minimal background on a control sample. These standard conditions were maintained for all measurements. We acquired collections of optical slices in confocal mode in 1µm axial steps. Analysis was performed using the Comos software package MPL program provided by Bio-Rad (Melville, NY, USA).
Histochemical procedure
For histochemical detection of ChAT activity, mating-competent mt I and mt II cells, non-mating-competent cells and immature cells were fixed as described above and incubated in the medium suggested by Burt (Burt, 1970) for at least 4h at 37°C in a moist chamber. To this medium (4mmoll-1choline, 0.2mmoll-1 acetyl-CoA, 1.8mmoll-1lead nitrate and 0.2moll-1 maleate buffer), 10µl of BW284c51 (anti-AChE) (Sigma) was added to prevent AChE already present in the cells from destroying any newly formed ACh, so inducing salt precipitation. Controls were incubated in the same mixture without acetyl-CoA. After staining, the cells were examined in a Zeiss microscope.
Immunoblot analysis
Mating-competent mt I and mt II cells, non-mating-competent cells and immature cells were centrifuged at 600g to a density of 40x103cellsml-1. The samples were treated with the protease inhibitors phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride (PMSF) (Sigma) and leupeptin (Sigma) at concentrations of 2mmoll-1 and 5µgml-1, respectively, maintained at -80°C for 10min and centrifuged at 13000g for 30min. The pellet, containing the membrane fraction, and the supernatant, containing the cytoplasmic fraction, were treated with 2% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) (Sigma) and kept at -20°C for 48h. After centrifugation at 16000g, 2% sample buffer (10% SDS, 10% glycerol, 0.25mmoll-1Tris-HCl and 10% ß-mercaptoethanol, pH6.8) was added to the supernatant, and the mixture was boiled for 5min with commercial ChAT from human placenta (Sigma; 2.1µgµl-1), which was used as a control. The total protein content of the experimental samples was evaluated spectroscopically using the method of Millon-Nasse (Oser, 1965). Bromophenol Blue (Sigma) was added to all the samples, and protein (40µgµl-1) from each sample was layered onto the gel. ChAT-like molecules were separated on a 4% stacking gel and an 8% polyacrylamide gel with 10% SDS (according to the method of Ornstein and Davis, 1962). Electrophoresis was performed at room temperature (25°C) for 2h at 150V. The gels were then transferred to nitrocellulose according to standard procedures. The blots were incubated with anti-human placenta ChAT polyclonal antibody AB143, raised in rabbit (Chemicon International Inc., Temecula, CA, USA) and diluted 1:1000 in 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in Tris-buffered saline/Tween-20 (TBS-T) and with secondary antibody anti-rabbit immunoglobulins, diluted 1:1000 in BSA in TBS-T, and conjugated with alkaline phosphatase (Sigma). The blots were stained using a NBT/BCIP kit (Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany). The resulting bands were compared with bands stained in the lane containing commercial ChAT, and molecular masses were estimated by comparison with a commercial molecular mass standard marker (Celbio, Milan, Italy).
In vivo AChE and ChAT activity inhibition assays
BW284c51 (anti-AChE) or eserine (anti-cholinesterases) (Sigma) solution (10-3moll-1), stored at -20°C, was added to mating-competent mt I and mt II cell populations at a final concentration of 10-4moll-1. After a 30min incubation, 30 treated mt I and 30 treated mt II cells were mixed either with a treated or with an untreated cell population of the opposite mating type. Congo Red (anti-ChAT) (Sigma) solution (10-2moll-1), stored at 4°C, was added to mating-competent mt I and mt II cell populations for 30min at a final concentration of 10-3moll-1. Then, 30 treated mt I and 30 treated mt II cells were mixed with untreated mt II and mt I cell populations, respectively. Other crosses, referred to as control crosses, were carried out by mixing 30 untreated mt I and 30 untreated mt II cells with untreated mt II and mt I cell populations, respectively. The number of pairs formed in experimental and control crosses was recorded for 60min after mixing the cells. All experiments were performed at least in duplicate. Students t-test was used to compare the mean number of pairs formed in the experimental crosses with the control mean.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The immunoblot analysis of mating-competent mt I and mt II cells, non-mating-competent cells and immature cells revealed the presence of several immunoreactive bands, ranging between 42 and 133kDa, as reported for ChAT isolated from higher organisms (Brandon and Wu, 1978; Driskell et al., 1978; Malthe-Sørenssen et al., 1978; Ryan and McClure, 1979; Slemmon et al., 1982), distributed differently according to the stage of the developmental cycle. This finding is consistent with the pattern for commercial ChAT from human placenta, used as a control, which shows eight ChAT antibody-immunoreactive proteins in the range between 32.5 and 175kDa. Four immunoreactive bands are found in P. primaurelia membrane lysates. Not all these proteins are enzymatically active because no histochemical reaction for ChAT was detected in immature cells displaying the two lightest bands, 42 and 46kDa. These proteins may be produced by proteolytic degradation of ChAT, as reported by Badamchian and Carroll (Badamchian and Carroll, 1985) for mammalian brain low-molecular-mass forms. However, according to Grosman et al. (Grosman et al., 1995), the observation of Cozzari and Hartman (Cozzari and Hartman, 1983), that smaller ChAT-associated proteins can regulate ChAT activity, raises the possibility that these smaller molecules may play a role in the synthesis of ACh. The membrane lysates from both mating-competent and non-mating-competent cells contain, in addition, proteins with a molecular mass of 56 and 133kDa. It is worth noting that the 133kDa protein is absent from mt II cells, suggesting that the absence of this heaviest molecular form is related to mating type. Furthermore, the stronger histochemical reaction for ChAT in both mt I and non-mating-competent cells compared with mt II cells suggests that the 133kDa protein may possess ChAT activity, as reported by Chao and Wolfgram (Chao and Wolfgram, 1973) for the 120kDa ChAT molecular form found in bovine brain. The four immunoreactive bands present in the cytoplasmic lysates do not appear to possess catalytic activity because no histochemical reaction for ChAT was detected in the cytoplasm of the intact cells. We propose that the ChAT antibody-immunoreactive proteins found in this cell domain correspond to precursor proteins not yet possessing enzyme activity.
Taken together, these results suggest that cell-to-cell adhesion may be regulated by a signal, due to ChAT-synthesized ACh, originating principally in the mt I cells and received by the ACh receptors localized at the surface membrane in both mt I and mt II cells. Moreover, all these findings are in line with the localization of AChE activity, which is present within the cytoplasm of immature cells and at the surface membrane of mating-competent cells (Delmonte Corrado et al., 1999). Therefore, the activity of AChE in conjugation seems to be initiated in cells unable to conjugate and to be fully developed in mating-competent cells, which display AChE activity at their surface membrane, the site in the cell where ChAT synthesizes the target molecule for AChE.
Our results from in vivo experiments also demonstrate the role of the cholinergic system in conjugation. The effects of inhibition of ChAT and AChE activity suggest a negative modulating effect of ACh on mating-cell pairing, i.e. ACh would not promote cell pairing, which may be enhanced by other signal molecules, but would be able to decrease the ability of cells to conjugate or to prevent conjugation. The blockade of ACh synthesis seems not to affect cell-to-cell adhesion, while the blockade of the function of AChE in cleaving ACh appears to inhibit cell-to-cell adhesion. An excess of ACh at its receptor sites can have either an overexcitatory or an inhibitory effect on ACh receptor function, resulting in the blockage or impairment of cell function, as demonstrated in sea urchin spermatozoa (Falugi et al., 1993).
On the basis of the considerations mentioned above and our previous results, a possible functional scheme for the cholinergic system in P. primaurelia conjugation can be outlined. ACh synthesized by ChAT could be the signal molecule negatively modulating cell-to-cell adhesion performed by the surface glycoconjugates bearing NeuAc and GlcNAc as terminal glycosidic residues (Delmonte Corrado et al., 1997). ACh may interact with these surface-exposed glycosidic molecules so that their pattern of distribution would be modified according to the behaviour of the cell (the ability or inability to pair in conjugation) during the developmental cycle. In this light, the surface pattern of distribution of these glycosidic residues could be a result of a transduction cascade triggered by ACh-mediated excitation of muscarinic receptors located at the cell surface and associated with an intracellular transduction system activated by G-proteins (Laasberg et al., 1987; Bonner, 1989). We have shown previously (Trielli et al., 1997) that exposure to cholinomimetic drugs caused both an alteration in the surface pattern of distribution of glycosidic residues and an inhibition of mating-cell pairing. These results pave the way to further investigations focused on identifying other signal molecules involved in regulating mating-cell pairing and on detecting the surface glycoconjugates responsible for mating-cell pairing.
In conclusion, the cell-to-cell interactions during conjugation in P. primaurelia can provide a powerful model with which to investigate the first event during metazoan development, namely fertilization. Cell-to-cell interactions between gametes have been extensively studied in numerous animal groups on the basis of two different conceptual approaches related to the role of signal molecules, in particular neurotransmitter signalling (Eusebi et al., 1984; Falugi et al., 1990; Ibanez et al., 1991; Young and Laing, 1991; Baccetti et al., 1995; Kuo et al., 2000) and the role of the carbohydrate moieties of surface glycoproteins (for a review, see Rosati, 1995). The molecules involved in regulating and performing cell-to-cell adhesion in P. primaurelia make this biological system suitable for exploitation to elucidate how different mechanisms may interact at both the organism and cellular levels.
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Baccetti, B., Burrini, A. G., Collodel, G., Falugi, C., Moretti, E. and Piomboni, P. (1995). Localization of two classes of acetylcholine receptor-like molecules in sperms of different animal species. Zygote 3, 207217.[Medline]
Badamchian, M. and Carroll, P. T. (1985). Molecular weight determinations of soluble and membrane-bound fractions of choline acetyltransferase in rat brain. J. Neurosci. 5, 19551964.[Abstract]
Bonner, T. I. (1989). The molecular basis of muscarinic receptor diversity. Trends Neurosci. 12, 148151.[Medline]
Brandon, C. and Wu, J. Y. (1978). Purification and properties of choline acetyltransferase from Torpedo californica. J. Neurochem. 30, 791797.[Medline]
Burt, A. M. (1970). A histochemical procedure for the localization of choline acetyltransferase activity. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 18, 408415.[Medline]
Buznikov, G. A. (1990). Neurotransmitters in Embryogenesis. Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers.
Chao, L. P. and Wolfgram, F. (1973). Purification and some properties of choline acetyltransferase (EC 2.3.1.6.) from bovine brain. J. Neurochem. 20, 10751081.[Medline]
Cozzari, C. and Hartman, B. K. (1983). An endogenous inhibitory factor for choline acetyltransferase. Brain Res. 276, 109118.[Medline]
Dale, H. H. (1914). The action of certain esters of choline and their relation to muscarine. J. Pharmac. Exp. Ther. 6, 147190.
Delmonte Corrado, M. U., Locatelli, D., Paleari, L. and Bottiroli, G. (1997). Lectin-binding sites involved in Paramecium primaurelia mating pair formation. J. Euk. Microbiol. 44, 303308.
Delmonte Corrado, M. U., Politi, H., Trielli, F., Angelini, C. and Falugi, C. (1999). Evidence for the presence of a mammalian-like cholinesterase in Paramecium primaurelia (Protista, Ciliophora) developmental cycle. J. Exp. Zool. 283, 102105.[Medline]
Driskell, W. J., Weber, B. H. and Roberts, E. (1978). Purification of choline acetyltransferase from Drosophila melanogaster. J. Neurochem. 30, 11351141.[Medline]
Eusebi, F., Pasetto, N. and Siracusa, G. (1984). Acetylcholine receptors in human oocytes. J. Physiol., Lond. 346, 321330.[Abstract]
Falugi, C. (1993). Localization and possible role of molecules associated with the cholinergic system during non nervous developmental events. Eur. J. Histochem. 37, 287294.[Medline]
Falugi, C., Faraldi, G. and Tagliafierro, G. (1990). Cholinesterase activity and neurotransmitter systems in amphibian gametogenesis. In Cholinesterases, vol. I (ed. J. Massoulié, F. Bacou, E. Barnard, A. Chatonnet, P. B. Doctor and D. M. Quinn), pp. 194195. Washington DC: American Chemical Society.
Falugi, C., Pieroni, M. and Moretti, E. (1993). Cholinergic molecules and sperm functions. J. Submicrosc. Cytol. Pathol. 23, 6369.
Grosman, D. D., Lorenzi, M. V., Trinidad, A. C. and Strauss, W. L. (1995). The human choline acetyltransferase gene encodes two proteins. J. Neurochem. 65, 484491.[Medline]
Hiwatashi, K. (1951). Studies on the conjugation of Paramecium caudatum. IV. Conjugation behavior of individuals of two mating types marked by a vital staining method. Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ. Ser. 4, 19, 9599.
Hiwatashi, K. (1969). Paramecium. In Fertilization, vol. 2 (ed. C. B. Metz and A. Monroy), pp. 255293. London, New York: Academic Press.
Ibanez, C. F., Pelto-Huikko, M., Soder, O., Ritzen, E.,M., Hersh, L. B., Hokfelt, T. and Persson, H. (1991). Expression of choline acetyltransferase mRNA in spermatogenic cells results in an accumulation of the enzyme in the postacrosomal region of mature spermatozoa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 36763680.[Abstract]
Kennedy, S. W. (1991). The mechanisms of organophosphate inhibition of cholinesterase. Proposal for a new approach to measuring inhibition. In Chemical in Agriculture. Cholinesterase Inhibiting Insecticides. Their Impact on Wildlife and the Environment, vol. 2 (ed. P. Mineau), pp. 7487. Amsterdam, London, New York: Elsevier.
Kuo, R. K., Baxter, G. I., Thompson, S. H., Stricker, S. A., Patton, C., Bonaventura, J. and Epel, D. (2000). NO is necessary and sufficient for egg activation at fertilization. Nature 406, 633636.[Medline]
Laasberg, T., Pedak, A. and Neuman, T. (1987). The muscarinic receptor-mediated action of acetylcholine in the gastrulating chick embryo. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 86C, 313316.
Le Novere, N. and Changeux, J. P. (1995). Molecular evolution of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor: an example of multigene family in excitable cells. J. Mol. Evol. 40, 155172.[Medline]
Luporini, P. and Miceli, C. (1986). Mating pheromones. In The Molecular Biology of Ciliated Protozoa (ed. J. G. Gall), pp. 263299. Orlando, London: Academic Press.
Luporini, P., Miceli, C., Ortenzi, C. and Vallesi, A. (1996). Ciliate pheromones. In Signaling Mechanisms in Protozoa and Invertebrates (ed. G. Csaba and W. E. G. Muller), pp. 80104. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
Malthe-Sørenssen, D., Lea, T., Fonnum, F. and Eskeland, T. (1978). Molecular characterization of choline acetyltransferase from bovine brain caudate nucleus and some immunological properties of the highly purified enzymes. J. Neurochem. 30, 3546.[Medline]
Massoulié, J., Pezzementi, L., Bon, S., Krejici, E. and Vallette, F. M. (1993). Molecular and cellular biology of cholinesterases. Prog. Neurobiol. 41, 4191.
Mautner, H. G. (1986). Choline acetyltransferase. In Neuromethods, series 1, Neurochemistry Neurotransmitters Enzymes (ed. A. A. Boutton, G. B. Baker and P. H. Yu), pp. 273317. Clifton, NJ: Humana Press.
Mautner, H. G., Merrill, R. E., Currier, S. F. and Harvey, G. (1981). Interaction of aromatic dyes with the coenzyme A binding site of choline acetyltransferase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78, 74497452.[Abstract]
Nachmansohn, D. and Machado, A. L. (1943). The formation of acetylcholine, a new enzyme choline acetylase. J. Neurophysiol. 6, 397403.
Ornstein, L. and Davis, B. (1962). Disk Electrophoresis, parts I and II. New York: Distillation Products Industries.
Oser, B. L. (1965). Hawks Physiological Chemistry. London: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
Rosati, F. (1995). Spermegg interactions during fertilization in invertebrates. Boll. Zool. 62, 323334.
Ryan, R. L. and McClure, W. O. (1979). Purification of choline acetyltransferase from rat and cow brain. Biochemistry 24, 53575365.
Slemmon, J. R., Salvaterra, P. M., Crawford, G. D. and Roberts, E. (1982). Purification of choline acetyltransferase from Drosophila melanogaster. J. Biol. Chem. 257, 38473852.
Sonneborn, T. M. (1970). Methods in Paramecium research. In Methods in Cell Physiology, vol. 4 (ed. D. M. Prescott), pp. 241399. New York, London: Academic Press.
Stroud, R. M., McCarthy, M. P. and Shuster, M. (1990). Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor superfamily of ligand-gated ion channels. Biochemistry 29, 1100911023.[Medline]
Trielli, F., Politi, H., Falugi, C. and Delmonte Corrado, M. U. (1997). Presence of molecules related to the cholinergic system in Paramecium primaurelia (Protista, Ciliophora) and possible role in mating pair formation: an experimental study. J. Exp. Zool. 279, 633638.
Wessler, I., Kirkpatrick, C. J. and Racke, K. (1999). The cholinergic pitfall: acetylcholine, a universal cell molecule in biological systems, including humans. Clin. Exp. Pharmac. Physiol. 26, 198205.[Medline]
Young, M. J. and Laing, J. C. (1991). The binding characteristics of cholinergic sites in rabbit spermatozoa. Mol. Reprod. Devl. 28, 5561.[Medline]