Serotonin modifies the sensitivity of the male silkmoth to pheromone
1 Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki
305-8572, Japan
2 Human Information Systems, Kanazawa Institute of Technology, 3-1 Yakkaho,
Matto, Ishikawa 924-0838, Japan
3 Department of Mechano-Informatics, Graduate School of Information Science
and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: kanzaki{at}i.u-tokyo.ac.jp)
Accepted 16 April 2004
![]() |
Summary |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: insect, HPLC, Bombyx mori, olfaction, serotonin, pheromone, circadian rhythm
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Serotonin is responsible for the modulation of various behaviors in
insects: for example, short-term memory, sensitivity to olfactory stimuli
(Mercer and Menzel, 1982;
Menzel et al., 1999
) and
foraging behavior in honeybees (Schulz et
al., 2002
). Serotonin is also involved in the regulation of the
optic lobe circadian clock in the cricket
(Tomioka et al., 1993
;
Tomioka, 1999
) and the
cockroach (Page, 1987
).
Moreover, serotonin increases the duration of random activity in the cabbage
looper (Trichoplusia ni) and the gypsy moth (Lymantria
dispar; Linn and Roelofs,
1986
; Linn et al.,
1992
).
Investigations of the effects of serotonin in the moth olfactory system
have shown that, in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta, serotonin enhances
the responses of some neurons in the first olfactory center, the antennal lobe
(AL), to electrical and pheromonal stimuli
(Kloppenburg and Hildebrand,
1995; Kloppenburg et al.,
1999
). Furthermore, in cultured AL neurons, serotonin increases
the spike number and induces a broadening of action potentials
(Mercer et al., 1996
).
Serotonin application also affects both pheromone-evoked local field
potentials and potential oscillations in the macroglomerular complex (MGC) of
male M. sexta AL (Kloppenburg and
Heinbockel, 2000
). In the silkworm moth, Bombyx mori,
high-speed optical imaging with a voltage-sensitive dye has shown that
serotonin increases the maximum amplitude and duration of the optical
responses in the AL (both the MGC and the ordinary glomeruli), suggesting that
serotonin enhances neuronal responses in the AL
(Hill et al., 2003
).
The effects of serotonin on the response to pheromone in moths may be
related to the presence of a pair of unique serotonin-immunoreactive neurons
that innervate both ALs and have been identified in B. mori
(Hill et al., 2002) as well as
in several other insects (Schurmann and
Klemm, 1984
; Kent et al.,
1987
; Rehder et al.,
1987
; Breidbach,
1990
; Salecker and Distler,
1990
).
Insect olfactory systems are useful models for comprehending neural
processing since olfactory information is processed through similar mechanisms
in vertebrates and insects. The insect AL, while anatomically similar to the
vertebrate olfactory bulb, contains far fewer neurons
(Hildebrand, 1996). Insect
systems are of great interest given that they can be studied from the single
neuron to the neural network and finally at the behavioral level. Moth
olfactory systems, such as the pheromone-related olfactory pathway, have been
studied extensively, from the ALs to the pre-motor centers
(Kanzaki, 1997
;
De Belle and Kanzaki, 1999
;
Kanzaki et al., 2003
).
In the present study, we therefore focus on the role of serotonin in the
olfactory processing pathway of B. mori, which shows a stereotypical
behavior called the `mating dance' when encountering female pheromone
(Kramer, 1975;
Kanzaki et al., 1992
;
Kanzaki, 1998
).
Here, we examine at the behavioral level the modulatory effects of serotonin on the enhancement of neural activity in B. mori's AL. We applied serotonin (10-5 mol l-1, 10-4 mol l-1 and 10-3 mol l-1) and two of its antagonists, mianserin (10-4 mol l-1) and ketanserin (10-4 mol l-1 and 10-3 mol l-1), to the desheathed ALs of the male silkmoth and measured the pheromone sensitivity. 10-4 mol l-1 serotonin increased the sensitivity to pheromone while 10-3 mol l-1 serotonin, 10-4 mol l-1 mianserin and 10-3 mol l-1 ketanserin had the opposite effect. We measured the levels of serotonin in the brain after application using HPLC with electrochemical detection: 10-3 mol l-1 and 10-4 mol l-1 applications increased the serotonin concentration in the brain, while 10-5 mol l-1 application did not differ from the control. Furthermore, a circadian variation of serotonin, quantified with HPLC, showed a strong relationship with a circadian variation of the male moth sensitivity to pheromone. Our results demonstrate that the enhancing effects of serotonin in the olfactory neural pathway contribute to an arousal mechanism at the behavioral level, leading to a higher sensitivity to pheromone. Additionally, the moth's sensitivity to pheromone seems to be related to a circadian variation of serotonin in the brain.
![]() |
Materials and methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Behavioral experiments
Procedure for application of substances
24 h before the beginning of the experiments, the head capsule was opened,
the tracheae were gently removed and the ALs were desheathed in order to allow
the substances to reach the brain. The insects were stored at 26°C (16 h:8
h light:dark photoperiod) until the experiment. Substances were applied to the
brain with a volume of 4 µl using a Hamilton microliter syringe.
Physiological saline, containing (in mmol l-1) 140 NaCl, 5 KCl, 7
CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 4 NaHCO3, 5 trehalose, 5
N-tris (hydroxymethyl)-methyl-2-amino-ethanesulfonic acid (TES) and
100 sucrose (pH 7.3), was applied as the control. Serotonin (5-HT creatine
sulfate; Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) and two of its antagonists, ketanserin and
mianserin (Sigma), were applied at the following concentrations:
10-5 mol l-1, 10-4 mol l-1,
10-3 mol l-1 for serotonin, 10-4 mol
l-1 and 10-3 mol l-1 for ketanserin and
10-4 mol l-1 for mianserin. The application of saline as
a wash followed the drug application. Two hours separated the control
(performed at 11.00±1 h) and the drug in order to avoid the side effect
of adaptation or habituation, and one day separated applications of drug and
wash so as to match the time of day. As a preliminary experiment, we checked
that the 2 h interval between the control and the drug did not have any effect
on the moths' sensitivity to pheromone.
Experimental set-up and sensitivity to pheromone experiments
3 min after injection, four moths were placed in a translucent acrylic
closed box (29.5x22x5 cm). A 2 mm-diameter hole in the middle of
the lid allowed the insertion of a Pasteur pipette tip. The insects were
placed 7.3 cm from the pheromone source (see
Fig. 1). Air-puff stimulus was
used to spread odors into the box. The pheromonal stimulus was the principal
pheromone component of B. mori: synthetic
(E,Z)-10,12-hexadecadien-1-ol (bombykol) dissolved in n-hexane. The olfactory
stimulant was applied to a piece of filter paper (1x2 cm) and then
inserted into the Pasteur pipette. Pulsed olfactory stimulation was produced
with a three-way solenoid valve controlled by an electronic stimulator. The
following series of bombykol concentrations were applied to the moth: n-hexane
as a control, 0.1 ng, 0.3 ng, 1 ng, 2.5 ng, 5 ng, 10 ng, 30 ng and 100 ng,
always one pulse, from the lowest to the highest concentration, at intervals
of 30 s. The duration of the pulse was 200 ms and the flux rate was 1.4 l
min-1. A smoke test was performed using TiCl4 in order
to simulate the shape and position of the pheromone plume. The smoke reached
the moths' position within 2 s. The air and odorant were removed after each
set of experiments through an exhaust tube placed behind the box. Boxes were
changed after each series of bombykol, and contamination by pheromone in the
experimental area was constantly checked for by placing moths around the
setup. Wing fluttering within 30 s of the puff was the criterion of whether
the moth responded to pheromone. The behavioral response of the moths and the
pheromone stimulation were simultaneously recorded on a digital video camera
(Handycam; Sony, Tokyo, Japan; 30 frames s-1) with an LED lamp
connected to the electrical stimulator flashing at each pheromone puff. The
light level was kept constant at 480 lux during the day and 2 lux at
night.
|
In the experiments concerning circadian variation of male sensitivity to pheromone, the sensitivity to pheromone was measured in a 24 h time period in intact moths, and the responses were divided into 12 durations of 2 h. The series of pheromone concentrations was, in this case, 0.05 ng, 0.1 ng, 0.5 ng, 1 ng, 5 ng, 10 ng and 50 ng.
Biogenic amines analysis
Animals
When measuring serotonin circadian variation, three-day-old adult males
were frozen in liquid nitrogen at the following times during the photoperiod:
0.00 h, 04.00 h, 08.00 h, 12.00 h, 16.00 h and 20.00 h. In the case of
serotonin application, the procedure was similar to the behavioral experiments
(control, 11.00 h; drugs, 13.00 h; wash, next day 11.00 h). The heads were cut
off and immediately stored at 80°C and lyophilized until dissection
and analysis.
Chromatography
When measuring serotonin circadian variation, an improved version of the
method originally designed by Nagao and Tanimura
(1988,
1989
) was used for serotonin
detection. Each brain (including protocerebrum, ALs and optic lobes) was
dissected and homogenized in a micro-glass homogenizer (Wheaton, Millville,
NJ, USA) in 50 µl of ice-cold 0.1 mol l-1 perchloric acid
containing 12.5 ng ml-1 3,4-dihydroxybenzylamine (DHBA) as the
internal standard. After stirring for 3 min on ice, the homogenate was
centrifuged at 17 400 g for 30 min at 0°C. The supernatant
was transferred to a micro-vial for immediate injection onto an HPLC column
for analysis. The HPLC system was composed of a pump (501; Waters, Milford,
MA, USA), a refrigerated automatic injector (231-401; Gilson, Middleton, WI,
USA) and a C18 reversed-phase column (250 mmx4.6 mm i.d.; 5
µm average particle size; Capcell Pak C18 MG, Shiseido, Tokyo,
Japan). A glassy carbon electrode (WE-GC; Eicom, Kyoto, Japan) was used for
electrochemical detection. The detector potential was usually set at 0.85 V
against an Ag/AgCl reference electrode, which was maintained at 30°C.
Signals from the electrochemical detector were recorded and integrated using
data analysis software (Millennium; Waters). The mobile phase contained 0.18
mol l-1 monochloroacetic acid and 6 mg l-1 of EDTA
disodium salt and was adjusted to pH 3.6 with sodium hydroxide. 1.6 mmol
l-1 of sodium-1-octanesulfonate and 9% (v/v) acetonitrile were
added to the solution. The mobile phase buffer was filtered through a 0.22
µm filter (GVWP 04700; Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) and degassed under
vacuum. The flow rate was kept constant at 0.7 ml min-1.
In the case of serotonin application, each brain (including protocerebrum and ALs) was dissected and transferred into an Eppendorf tube containing 50 µl of 10 ng ml-1 isoproterenol (as the internal standard), 100 µmol l-1 EDTA disodium salt and 0.1 mol l-1 perchloric acid. The samples were sonicated for 3 min and centrifuged at 17 400 g for 30 min at 4°C. The supernatant was injected directly onto the column. The method consisted of an HPLC system (HTEC-500; Eicom), a refrigerated automatic injector (234; Gilson), a temperature regulator (832; Gilson), a C18 column (Eicompak SC-5ODS; 3x150 mm; Eicom) and a graphite electrode (WE-PG; Eicom). The mobile phase contained 100 mmol l-1 citrate acetate buffer (pH 3.6). 0.58 mmol l-1 sodium-1-octanesulfonate and 12% (v/v) methanol were added to the solution. The flow rate was kept constant at 0.5 ml min-1. The detector was set at a working potential of 950 mV against an Ag/AgCl reference electrode and kept at 23°C. External standards were run at the beginning and at intervals throughout the runs.
In both cases, measurements based on the peak height of the chromatogram were obtained by calculating the ratio of the peak height of a substance to the peak height of the internal standard. Concentrations were obtained by comparison of the ratios between the sample and standard chromatograms. Chemicals were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co., except for SOS, acetonitrile (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan), monochloroacetic acid and sodium hydroxide (Wako, Osaka, Japan).
Data analysis
Sensitivity to different pheromone concentrations was analyzed with the
General Linear Model (GLM) Univariate
(Edwards, 1993), followed by
the Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons among groups. The dependent
variable was the number of moths fluttering their wings; the independent
variables were pheromone concentration (0.3, 1, 2.5, 5, 10, 30, 100 ng) and
treatment (control, drug and wash) in the case of drug application, and
pheromone concentration (0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 50 ng) and time of day
(0.00, 02.00, 04.00, 06.00, 08.00, 10.00, 12.00, 14.00, 16.00, 18.00, 20.00,
22.00 h) in the case of circadian behavioral variation. Figs
2,
5,
8 show the detailed behavioral
responses for each pheromone concentration while Figs
3,
6 represent the difference of
mean of behavioral responses obtained with the GLM between the drug and the
control for the set of pheromone concentrations. In both cases, the percentage
of responses (Figs 2,
5,
8) and of difference of
responses between drug and control (Figs
3,
6) was presented on the
y-axis in order to allow a comparison between treatments. The
efficiency of serotonin application was measured with the KruskalWallis
test. Serotonin circadian variation was evaluated with one-way ANOVA followed
by Tukey's pairwise comparison. The relationship between serotonin levels in
the brain and the pheromone sensitivity within 24 h was analyzed with the
Pearson correlation coefficient.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In all cases, significant difference was set at P<0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using commercially available software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Concentration of serotonin in the brain after application of drugs
Serotonin levels in the brain were measured 3 min after application of
saline (the control) and serotonin (10-5, 10-4 and
10-3 mol l-1) and 24 h after washing with saline
(10-4 and 10-3 mol l-1 serotonin)
(Fig. 4). Application of
10-5 mol l-1 serotonin produced no change in levels in
the brain compared with control levels, but there was a significant difference
(P<0.001) when comparing 10-4 and 10-3 mol
l-1 serotonin with the control [increasing the control levels (0.18
pmol brain-1) to 0.44 and 0.80 pmol brain-1, resulting
in an increase of 241 and 424%, respectively]. After 24 h, the levels of
serotonin decreased to the control levels.
|
Effects of the serotonin antagonists mianserin and ketanserin on the male sensitivity to pheromone
The effects of application of serotonin antagonists on the behavioral
sensitivity were also evaluated. Mianserin (10-4 mol
l-1), a 5-HT1-2 blocker
(Dringenberg, 2000;
Tierney, 2001
), shifted the
response to pheromone to the right, as shown in
Fig. 5A. In response to 5 ng of
pheromone, the behavioral response decreased from 46% with the control to 33%
with the serotonin antagonist. The subjects did not completely revert to
control behavioral sensitivity after 24 h.
Ketanserin is a highly selective 5-HT2 antagonist
(Chen et al., 1999;
Dringenberg, 2000
;
Saifullah and Tomioka, 2003
).
At 10-3 mol l-1, ketanserin decreased the behavioral
sensitivity in a significant manner (P<0.01;
Fig. 5B): over the whole
pheromone concentration gradient, the response was lower with the drug,
leading to a drop from 25% to 17% with a 5 ng pheromone exposure. In this case
too, the reversion to control behavioral sensitivity was not totally
accomplished after 24 h.
The inhibitory effects of serotonin antagonists were dependent on the antagonist type (mianserin versus ketanserin) and on the antagonist concentration (for ketanserin, 10-4 mol l-1 versus 10-3 mol l-1) (Fig. 6). 10-4 mol l-1 ketanserin did not have any effect on the moth's sensitivity to pheromone compared with the control (mean difference=0.94±2.20, non-significant) whereas a concentration of 10-3 mol l-1 decreased the behavioral response (mean difference=6.47±1.67; P<0.01). 10-4 mol l-1 mianserin (mean difference=9.02±2.69; P<0.02) had a stronger effect than both 10-3 and 10-4 mol l-1 ketanserin.
Circadian variation of serotonin in the brain
Fig. 7 shows the content of
serotonin in the brain every 4 h over 24 h. From the beginning of the
photophase until the noon peak, the concentration remained fairly constant
(0.57 pmol brain-1). The levels of serotonin in the brain were
highest at noon (0.72 pmol brain-1) and decreased progressively
until 2 h after the beginning of the scotophase (0.41 pmol
brain-1). The variation of serotonin levels in the brain was
statistically significant, with higher levels of serotonin at noon than at the
beginning of the scotophase (P<0.01; family error rate
<0.05).
Circadian variation of the pheromone-related behavior
The male sensitivity to pheromone was measured over a period of 24 h by
confronting the moths with a concentration gradient of synthetic pheromone
(Fig. 8). The GLM set a
significant circadian variation (P<0.001): the activity at the
beginning of the photophase (32% of the moths responded to 1 ng pheromone at
06.00 h) rose until noon (the percentage increased to 63%) before decreasing
until the scotophase (the number dropped to 16% at 22.00 h). Furthermore,
pheromone concentration had a significant effect on the behavioral response
(P<0.001): at critical concentrations, a twofold increase of the
concentration level (from 0.5 ng to 1 ng) led to a drastic change of
behavioral response to pheromone over 24 h (P<0.001).
Circadian variation of serotonin in the brain (Fig. 7) strongly correlated with the circadian variation of pheromone sensitivity (Fig. 8) (Pearson correlation coefficient >0.91 between the serotonin variation in the brain and the circadian behavioral response to 0.1, 0.5 and 1 ng of pheromone).
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In order to quantify serotonin diffusion efficiency into the brain, we also
performed HPLC measurements of brains 3 min and 24 h (wash) after application
of 10-5 mol l-1, 10-4 mol l-1 and
10-3 mol l-1 serotonin. Our results showed that
application of serotonin at 10-4 mol l-1 and
10-3 mol l-1 increased brain serotonin levels by 241%
and 424%, respectively (Fig.
4).These levels correspond to an efficiency rate of 0.1% and 0.05%
respectively, a rate comparable with other studies; Linn et al.
(1994) showed that the
accumulation of serotonin that was expressed in the moth T. ni's
brain after injection was in the range of 0.10.6% of the amount
injected in the head without desheathing.
The distribution of injected solutions was monitored by a 3 min Lucifer
Yellow application on the desheathed brain (data not shown). Local staining of
the two ALs, excluding the protocerebrum, suggested that the effects of
serotonin and serotonin antagonists are mainly restricted to the ALs.
Furthermore, the increase of serotonin in the ALs subsequent to the
application of serotonin may be underestimated due to the fact that the AL is
15% of the whole brain volume.
Contradictory effects of different serotonin concentrations have been
reported in vertebrates and invertebrates. Serotonin has an excitatory effect
on the chick biventer cervicis muscle at suitable concentrations and an
inhibitory dose-dependent effect at high concentrations. An irreversible toxic
effect was observed with repeated exposures to serotonin
(Teerapong and Harvey, 1977).
Application of 10-4 mol l-1 serotonin to the desheathed
brain of B. mori increased the peak spike frequency of bombykol
responses recorded from the ventral nerve cord (VNC), while 10-3
mol l-1 serotonin decreased the peak spike frequency of bombykol
responses (E. S. Hill, unpublished observations). In the crayfish, the
neuromodulatory effect of serotonin on the lateral giant neurons is dependent
on its dose, rate and duration: inhibitory effects are obtained when high
concentrations are reached rapidly whereas excitatory effects occur when low
or high concentrations are reached gradually
(Teshiba et al., 2001
).
Serotonin could activate two parallel intracellular signaling pathways through
either different serotonin receptors
(Bermudez et al., 1992
;
Tierney, 2001
) or different
levels of a common initial second messenger
(Teshiba et al., 2001
). At
high concentrations, serotonin could also be activating other biogenic amine
receptors (Herman et al.,
2003
). Different concentrations of serotonin in the AL could also
differently affect synapses of the three types of neurons in the AL: olfactory
receptor neurons, local interneurons and projection neurons.
Mianserin and ketanserin, serotonin receptor antagonists, showed an
inhibitory effect on the behavioral sensitivity to pheromone (Figs
5,
6). Mianserin is known to be a
5-HT (serotonin) antagonist (Baines and
Downer, 1991; Tierney,
2001
), most probably a 5-HT1-2 receptor blocker
(Dringenberg, 2000
), and may
also act on octopamine receptors (von
Nickisch-Rosenegk et al., 1996
). Ketanserin is a highly selective
5-HT2 antagonist (Chen et al.,
1999
; Dringenberg,
2000
; Saifullah and Tomioka,
2003
). The 5-HT1-2 blocker induced a stronger decrease
in sensitivity than the 5-HT2 blocker, suggesting that different
receptors are activated by serotonin in the ALs and/or a combined action of
serotonin and octopamine. Ketanserin at 10-3 mol l-1
unlike at 10-4 mol l-1 had an effect on the pheromone
sensitivity, which suggests that ketanserin action is dose dependent. Both
serotonin antagonists showed an opposite effect to the excitatory effect of
serotonin. Application of a wider range of serotonin antagonists at a wider
concentration range would help to understand the role of serotonin receptors
in excitation and inhibition of the pheromone searching behavior.
In all pharmacological experiments apart from application of 10-4 mol l-1 serotonin, we did not observe a complete reversion of behavioral response after the wash (10-4 mol l-1 mianserin, 10-3 mol l-1 ketanserin; Fig. 5), even in moths not affected by the drug treatment (10-5 mol l-1 serotonin and 10-4 mol l-1 ketanserin; data not shown). The behavioral measurement of the wash was performed one day after the drug treatment in order to avoid a circadian effect and allow a natural chemical washout; this 24 h delay, in addition to the brain dissection performed previous to the experiments, could partly explain why the sensitivity did not reverse to `control' levels.
In moths, serotonin may be released in the ALs by a single pair of
serotonin-immunoreactive (SI) neurons with branches in every glomerulus of the
AL as well as in higher order neuropil regions of the brain
(Kent et al., 1987;
Hill et al., 2002
).
Furthermore, Hill et al.
(2002
) showed that this SI
neuron spikes spontaneously and responds to mechanosensory stimuli to the
antennae. Due to the fact that, in M. sexta, its branchings in the AL
contain mostly output synapses (Sun et
al., 1993
), the SI neuron may be involved in a feedback system
from the protocerebrum to the AL. Our serotonin application may therefore
mimic the SI neuron's release of serotonin in the AL.
Our pharmacological method, similar to the one used by Hill et al.
(2003), allows for a direct
comparison of serotonin's enhancing effects on neuronal populations in
specific AL glomeruli and on pheromone sensitivity at the behavioral level.
Our results suggest that the neuronal responses to pheromone are modulated by
serotonin in the ALs and transferred via higher information
processing centers in the protocerebrum to descending neurons related to the
pheromone-searching behavior (Kanzaki et al.,
1991
,
1994
).
In the AL, serotonin enhances central olfactory neuron responses to
electrical stimulation of the antennal nerve and female sex pheromone in
M. sexta (Kloppenburg and
Hildebrand, 1995; Kloppenburg
et al., 1999
). Furthermore, serotonin application increases the
amplitude and duration of pheromone-evoked local field potentials and the
magnitude of potential oscillations in the MGC of M. sexta
(Kloppenburg and Heinbockel,
2000
). In B. mori, application of serotonin to the AL
enhances both the maximum amplitude and duration of AL optical responses to
electrical stimulation of the antennal nerve. In the MGC, these effects are
stronger in the toroid (neuropil specialized in processing bombykol
information) than in the cumulus, the neuropil processing mainly the minor
pheromone component, bombykal (Hill et
al., 2003
; Kanzaki et al.,
2003
). All these findings suggest that the male moth is strongly
affected by serotonin in the AL and that these effects should in turn have
some behavioral significance. Until now, no such behavioral effects resulting
from serotonin application to the AL have been reported.
Based on these facts, the main expected effect of serotonin application to the ALs would be an enhancement of the male sensitivity to pheromone, as we observed when 10-4 mol l-1 serotonin was applied. Surprisingly, we also obtained an inhibitory effect with 10-3 mol l-1 serotonin. Our results are not irreconcilable with previous studies, in which the main serotonin concentration used was 10-4 mol l-1. We cannot exclude that such a high concentration of serotonin (10-3 mol l-1) does not occur in nature and that the behavioral decrease of response to pheromone is artificial. Supporting this idea, serotonin levels show a maximum of a twofold increase during the daily variation in the moth's brain (Fig. 7). This range of increase was obtained when applying 10-4 mol l-1 serotonin; when applying a concentration of 10-3 mol l-1, serotonin levels rose more than four times the control (Fig. 4), an increase much larger than that observed in the circadian variation of serotonin. A concentration similar to ours could provoke inhibitory effects on AL neuronal responses, leading to a pheromone sensitivity decrease. Another possibility, compatible with previous reports, could be that excitation of AL neurons due to 10-3 mol l-1 serotonin application could cause an inhibition of neurons in higher centers in the moth brain. A low rise in serotonin concentration would lead to an increase in sensitivity to pheromone, while a higher serotonin concentration would prevent the moth from responding further to pheromone. This hypothesis would give a new insight into the functional significance of the feedback role of the SI neuron in the moth brain.
The effects of serotonin and other amines (mainly octopamine and dopamine)
have been studied on a few insects' brains with different experimental
approaches. Local injections in various parts of the brain such as ALs, optic
lobes and mushroom bodies have been performed in the honeybee in order to
assess the effects of amines on olfactory conditioning (for a review, see
Bicker and Menzel, 1989;
Erber et al., 1993
). In a
noctuid moth, Trichoplusia ni, and in a diurnal moth, Lymantria
dispar, serotonin injection prior to light-off enhanced general locomotor
activity at night but not the sensitivity to pheromone
(Linn and Roelofs, 1986
;
Linn et al., 1992
). In our
experiments, we did not observe an enhancement of general locomotor activity;
instead we observed that serotonin modifies the moth's sensitivity to
pheromone. This discrepancy in results can be explained by the method used:
Linn et al. injected serotonin in the head capsule without desheathing, and
the behavior was measured with a 18 h delay of the injection, whereas
we chose application and desheathing in order to measure the behavior without
delay to obtain a fast effect of the drug in a similar way in both ALs,
avoiding as much as possible the effects of serotonin receptor desensitization
(Hanley and Hensler,
2002
).
Circadian variation of serotonin and of bombykol sensitivity
Given that, including the pair of AL-SI neurons, approximately 4050
SI neurons innervate all the brain neuropils (M. Iwano, personal
communication), we predict that serotonin also acts at other information
processing levels, such as the modulation of higher processing of the
characteristic zigzagging pattern following female pheromone release
(Kanzaki, 1998) or the
internal clock regulation in the optic lobe, a characteristic known in other
insects such as the cockroach (Page,
1987
) and the cricket
(Tomioka, 1999
).
Our results showed a high correlation between the male silkmoth's sensitivity to bombykol and brain serotonin levels (Figs 7, 8). Serotonin levels in the brain displayed a circadian variation with a peak at noon (Fig. 7) and a strong decrease around the beginning of the subjective night (more than 40% decrease). The curve's shape showed a striking similarity to the male moth's sensitivity to pheromone, mainly at intermediate pheromone concentrations (0.1, 0.5 and 1 ng). At higher concentrations (5, 10 and 50 ng), the correlation with serotonin circadian variation appeared to be hidden by a saturation of the behavioral response at noon. This similarity powerfully supports the notion that serotonin is at least partly responsible for pheromone sensitivity and, furthermore, would have a significant role in the circadian regulation of male behavior. Furthermore, we can combine our results and suggest that the ranges of circadian variation of serotonin in the brain match with the excitatory effects of serotonin in the ALs leading to a higher sensitivity to pheromone.
The difference between the serotonin daily concentration in the brain (Fig. 7) and the serotonin levels in the brain following a 4 µl application of external serotonin (Fig. 4) could be explained by the difference in brain dissection (levels of serotonin in Fig. 7 were obtained from ALs, protocerebrum and optic lobes, while Fig. 4 levels concern mainly the ALs and protocerebrum) as well as a seasonal variation of brain serotonin concentration.
Circadian variation of serotonin in the brain has been reported in several
insects (Muszynska-Pytel and Cymborowski,
1978; Bult et al.,
1991
; Tomioka et al.,
1993
; Linn et al.,
1994
; Kloppenburg et al.,
1999
). In the cricket and the cockroach, serotonin is known to be
involved in the regulation of the optic lobe circadian clock
(Page, 1987
;
Saifullah and Tomioka, 2003
;
Tomioka, 1999
). In B.
mori, serotonin circadian variation in the brain could also be related to
an endogenous clock and subsequently act simultaneously on the sensitivity to
pheromone in the AL and the endogenous clock, which could be partly located in
the central brain of moths
(Helfrich-Forster et al.,
1998
; Truman,
1974
). However, this dual role of serotonin can only be
speculated, given that in moths such involvement has not been clarified yet.
As another possibility, serotonin levels in the moth brain could also be
regulated predominantly by photic inputs through the lightdark cycle
and, in turn, act on the sensitivity to pheromone in the AL. In both cases,
the mechanisms underlying serotonin synthesis and release are still unclear.
The moth T. ni shows a diel fluctuation of serotonin in the brain,
with maximal levels in the light period even though the moth is inactive
during the day (Lingren et al.,
1977
; Linn et al.,
1994
). In contrast to that study, in M. sexta, also a
nocturnal moth (Lingren et al.,
1977
), a circadian variation of serotonin in the AL peaks at the
beginning of the subjective night
(Kloppenburg et al., 1999
). In
another nocturnal moth, Helicoverpa assulta, the peak of pheromone
release occurs during scotophase (Kamimura
and Tatsuki, 1994
).
B. mori female pheromone release also shows a circadian rhythm:
the release of pheromone increases at the beginning of photophase to reach a
peak 6 h later; this peak lasts for 2 h before decreasing until the beginning
of scotophase (Ichikawa,
1998). The circadian variation of the male's sensitivity to
pheromone allows the male to locate more efficiently the female during its
pheromone release peak window. This daily correlation between male and female
behavior and physiology creates a specific ecological niche of B.
mori that has been selected through evolution.
Behavioral experiments, such as pheromone sensitivity behavioral response, are important in order to grasp the concrete effect of neural substances on neural systems. However, they provide general concepts, given that the results are means of a great number of individuals. Therefore, in order to unravel the complex mechanisms underlying the excitatory/inhibitory effects of serotonin on sensitivity to pheromone, to confirm our hypothesis that the pheromone-sensitivity regulation is modulated in the AL by serotonin and to separate the effects of serotonin in the AL and in the PC, we are planning to combine behavioral and pharmacological experiments with physiological experiments, such as calcium imaging and extracellular recordings of the VNC, which would allow the use of a great range of concentrations combined with various measurements in single individuals.
In order to clarify the modulatory effects of serotonin in the moth brain, the possible involvement of serotonin in the endogenous clock should be investigated. In addition, so as to validate the hypothesis that serotonin circadian variation modulates the male silkmoth sensitivity to bombykol at the AL level, we are planning to measure the possible circadian variation of serotonin in the AL, as well as in other neuropils of the brain.
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Baines, R. A. and Downer, R. G. (1991). Pharmacological characterization of a 5-hydroxytryptamine-sensitive receptor/adenylate cyclase complex in the mandibular closer muscles of the cricket, Grillus bimaculatus. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 16,153 -163.[Medline]
Bermudez, I., Beadle, D. J. and Benson, J. A. (1992). Multiple serotonin-activated currents in isolated, neuronal somata from locust thoracic ganglia. J. Exp. Biol. 165,43 -60.
Bicker, G. and Menzel, R. (1989). Chemical codes for the control of behaviour in arthropods. Nature 337,33 -39.[CrossRef][Medline]
Breidbach, O. (1990). Serotonin-immunoreactive brain interneurons persist during metamorphosis of an insect, a developmental study of Tenebrio molitor, L. (Coleoptera). Cell Tissue Res. 259,345 -360.
Bult, R., Schuling, F. H. and Masterbroek, H. A. K. (1991). Circadian inputs influence the performance of a spiking, movement-sensitive neuron in the visual system of the blowfly. J. Biol. Rhythms 6,55 -69.[Medline]
Casagrand, J. L. and Ritzmann, R. E. (1992). Biogenic amines modulate synaptic transmission between identified giant interneurons and thoracic interneurons in the escape system of the cockroach. J. Neurobiol. 23,644 -655.[Medline]
Chen, B., Meinertzhagen, I. A. and Shaw, S. R. (1999). Circadian rhythms in light evoked responses of the fly's compound eye and the effects of neuromodulators 5-HT and the peptide PDF. J. Comp. Physiol. A 185,393 -404.[CrossRef][Medline]
Claassen, D. E. and Kammer, A. E. (1986). Effects of octopamine, dopamine and serotonin on production of flight motor output by thoracic ganglia of Manduca sexta. J. Neurobiol. 17,1 -14.[Medline]
De Belle, J. S. and Kanzaki, R. (1999). Protocerebral olfactory processing. In Insect Olfaction (ed. B.S. Hansson), pp.125 -161. Berlin: Springer.
Dringenberg, H. C. (2000). Serotonergic
receptor antagonists alter responses to general anesthetics in rats.
Br. J. Anaesth. 85,904
-906.
Edwards, L. K. (ed.) (1993). Applied analysis of variance in behavioral science. New York: M. Dekker.
Erber, J., Kloppenburg, P. and Scheider, A. (1993). Neuromodulation by serotonin and octopamine in the honeybee, behaviour, neuroanatomy and electrophysiology. Experientia 49,1073 -1083.
Evans, P. D. (1980). Biogenic amines in the insect nervous system. Adv. Insect Physiol. 15,317 -473.
Hanley, N. R. S. and Hensler, J. G. (2002).
Mechanisms of ligand-induced desensitization of the 5-hydroxytryptamine (2A)
receptor. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
300,468
-477.
Helfrich-Forster, C., Stengl, M. and Homberg, U. (1998). Organization of the circadian system in insects. Chronobiol. Int. 15,567 -594.[Medline]
Herman, J. K., O'Halloran, K. D., Janssen, P. L. and Bisgard, G. E. (2003). Dopaminergic excitation of the goat carotid body is mediated by the serotonin type 3 receptor subtype. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 136,1 -12.[CrossRef]
Hildebrand, J. G. (1996). Olfactory control of behavior in moths, central processing of odor information and the functional significance of olfactory glomeruli. J. Comp. Physiol. A 178,5 -19.[Medline]
Hill, E. S., Iwano, M., Gatellier, L. and Kanzaki, R.
(2002). Morphology and physiology of the serotonin-immunoreactive
putative antennal lobe feedback neuron in the male silkmoth Bombyx mori.Chem. Senses 27,475
-483.
Hill, E. S., Okada, K. and Kanzaki, R. (2003).
Visualization of modulatory effects of serotonin in the silkmoth antennal
lobe. J. Exp. Biol. 206,345
-352.
Ichikawa, T. (1998). Activity patterns of
neurosecretory cells releasing pheromonotropic neuropeptides in the moth
Bombyx mori. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95,4055
-4060.
Kamimura, M. and Tatsuki, S. (1994). Effects of photoperiodic changes on calling behavior and pheromone production in the oriental tobacco budworm, Helicoverpa assulta (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). J. Insect Physiol. 40,731 -734.[CrossRef]
Kanzaki, R. (1997). Pheromone processing in the lateral accessory lobes of the moth brain, flipflopping signals related to zigzagging upwind walking. In Pheromone Research, New Direction (ed. T. R. Cardé and A.K. Minks), pp.291 -303. New York: Chapman and Hall.
Kanzaki, R. (1998). Coordination of wing motion and walking suggests common control of zigzag motor program in a male silkworm moth. J. Comp. Physiol. A 182,267 -278.
Kanzaki, R., Arbas, E. A. and Hildebrand, J. G. (1991). Physiology and morphology of descending neurons in pheromone-processing olfactory pathways in the male moth Manduca sexta.J. Comp. Physiol. A 169,1 -14.[Medline]
Kanzaki, R., Ikeda, A. and Shibuya, T. (1994). Morphological and physiological properties of pheromone-triggered flipflopping descending interneurons of the male silkworm moth, Bombyx mori. J. Comp. Physiol. A 175,1 -14.
Kanzaki, R., Soo, K., Seki, Y. and Wada, S.
(2003). Projections to higher olfactory centers from subdivisions
of the antennal lobe macroglomerular complex of the male silkmoth.
Chem. Senses 28,113
-130.
Kanzaki, R., Sugi, N. and Shibuya, T. (1992). Self-generated zigzag turning of Bombyx mori males during pheromone-mediated upwind walking. Zool. Sci. 9, 515-527.
Kent, K. S., Hoskins, S. G. and Hildebrand, J. G. (1987). A novel serotonin-immunoreactive neuron in the antennal lobe of the sphinx moth Manduca sexta persists throughout postembryonic life. J. Neurobiol. 18,451 -465.[Medline]
Kloppenburg, P. and Heinbockel, T. (2000).
5-hydroxytryptamine modulates pheromone-evoked local field potentials in the
macroglomerular complex of the sphinx moth Manduca sexta. J. Exp.
Biol. 203,1701
-1709.
Kloppenburg, P. and Hildebrand, J. G. (1995). Neuromodulation by 5-hydroxytryptamine in the antennal lobe of the sphinx moth Manduca sexta. J. Exp. Biol. 198,603 -611.[Medline]
Kloppenburg, P., Ferns, D. and Mercer, A. R.
(1999). Serotonin enhances central olfactory neuron responses to
female sex pheromone in the male sphinx moth Manduca sexta. J.
Neurosci. 19,8172
-8181.
Kramer, E. (1975). Orientation of the male silkmoth to the sex attractant Bombykol. In Mechanisms in Insect Olfaction (ed. D. A. Denton and J. Coghlan), pp.329 -335. New York: Academic Press.
Lingren, P. D., Greene, G. L., Davis, D. R., Baumhover, A. H. and Henneberry, T. J. (1977). Nocturnal behavior of four lepidopteran pests that attack tobacco and other crops. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 70,161 -167.
Linn, C. E., Jr, Campbell, M. G. and Roelofs, W. L. (1992). Photoperiod cues and the modulatory action of octopamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine on locomotor and pheromone response in male gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 20,265 -284.
Linn, C. E. and Roelofs, W. L. (1986). Modulatory effects of octopamine and serotonin on thresholds for male sensitivity and periodicity of response to sex pheromone in the cabbage looper moth. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 3, 161-171.
Linn, C. E., Poole, K. R. and Roelofs, W. L. (1994). Studies on biogenic amines and metabolites in nervous tissue and hemolymph of male cabbage looper moth III. Fate of injected octopamine, 5-hydroxytryptamine and dopamine. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C 108,99 -106.
Menzel, R., Heyne, A., Kinzel, C., Gerber, B. and Fiala, A. (1999). Pharmacological dissociation between the reinforcing, sensitizing, and response-releasing functions of reward in honeybee classical conditioning. Behav. Neurosci. 113,744 -754.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mercer, A. R. and Menzel, R. (1982). The effects of biogenic amines on conditioned and unconditioned responses to olfactory stimuli in the honeybee, Apis mellifera. J. Comp. Physiol. A 145,363 -368.
Mercer, A. R., Kloppenburg, P. and Hildebrand, J. G. (1996). Serotonin-induced changes in the excitability of cultured antennal-lobe neurons of the sphinx moth Manduca sexta. J. Comp. Physiol. A 178,21 -31.[Medline]
Muszynska-Pytel, M. and Cymborowski, B. (1978). The role of serotonin in regulation of the circadian rhythms of locomotor activity in the cricket (Acheta domesticus L.) I. Circadian variations in serotonin concentration in the brain and hemolymph. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 59, 13-15.[CrossRef]
Nagao, T. and Tanimura, T. (1988). Distribution of biogenic amines in the cricket central nervous system. Anal. Biochem. 171,33 -40.[Medline]
Nagao, T. and Tanimura, T. (1989). Simultaneous determination of biogenic amines, their precursors and metabolites in a single brain of the cricket using high-performance liquid chromatography with amperometric detection. J. Chromat. 496, 39-53.[Medline]
Nässel, D. R. (1988). Serotonin and serotonin-immunoreactive neurons in the nervous system of insects. Prog. Neurobiol. 30,1 -85.[CrossRef][Medline]
Page, T. L. (1987). Serotonin phase-shifts the circadian rhythm of locomotor activity in the cockroach. J. Biol. Rhythms 2,23 -34.[Medline]
Rehder, V., Bicker, G. and Hammer, M. (1987). Serotonin-immunoreactive neurons in the antennal lobes and suboesophageal ganglion of the honeybee. Cell Tissue Res. 247, 59-66.
Saifullah, A. S. M. and Tomioka, K. (2003). 5-HT7-like receptors mediate serotonergic modulation of photo-responsiveness of the medulla bilateral neurons in the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Zool. Sci. 20,303 -309.[Medline]
Salecker, I. and Distler, P. (1990). Serotonin-immunoreactive neurons in the antennal lobes of the American cockroach Periplaneta americana, light- and electron-microscopic observations. Histochemistry 94,463 -473.[Medline]
Schulz, D. J., Elekonich, M. M. and Robinson, G. E. (2002). Biogenic amines in the antennal lobes and the initiation and maintenance of foraging behavior in honey bees. J. Neurobiol. 54,406 -416.[CrossRef]
Schurmann, F. W. and Klemm, N. (1984). Serotonin-immunoreactive neurons in the brain of the honeybee. J. Comp. Neurol. 225,570 -580.[Medline]
Sun, X. J., Tolbert, L. P. and Hildebrand, J. G. (1993). Ramification pattern and ultrastructural characteristics of the serotonin-immunoreactive neuron in the antennal lobe of the moth Manduca sexta, a laser scanning confocal and electron microscopy study. Neuron 338,5 -16.
Teerapong, P. and Harvey, A. L. (1977). The effect of 5-hydroxytryptamine on the chick biventer cervicis muscle. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 44,99 -104.[CrossRef][Medline]
Teshiba, T., Shamsian, A., Yashar, B., Yeh, S.-R., Edwards, D.
H. and Krasne, F. B. (2001). Dual and opposing
modulatory effects of serotonin on crayfish lateral giant escape command
neurons. J. Neurosci.
21,4523
-4529.
Tierney, A. J. (2001). Structure and function of invertebrate 5-HT receptors, a review. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 128,791 -804.
Tomioka, K. (1999). Light and serotonin phase-shift the circadian clock in the cricket optic lobe in vitro. J. Comp. Physiol. A 185,437 -444.
Tomioka, K., Ikeda, M., Nagao, T. and Tamotsu, S. (1993). Involvement of serotonin in the circadian rhythm of an insect visual system. Naturwissenschaften 80,137 -139.
Truman, J. W. (1974). Physiology of insect rhythms. IV. Role of the brain in the regulation of the flight rhythm of the giant silkmoths. J. Comp. Physiol. A 95,281 -296.
von Nickisch-Rosenegk, E., Krieger, J., Kubick, S., Laage, R., Strobel, J., Strotmann, J. and Breer, H. (1996). Cloning of biogenic amine receptors from moths (Bombyx mori and Heliothis virescens). Insect. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 26,817 -827.[CrossRef][Medline]