Sensorimotor adaptations to microgravity in humans
1 Brain Research Institute,
2 Department of Physiological Science and
3 Department of Neurobiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1527, USA
*Address for correspondence: 1804 Life Science Building, 621 Charles E. Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1527, USA (e-mail: vre{at}ucla.edu)
Accepted July 2, 2001
![]() |
Summary |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: chronic electromyography, microgravity, motor control, force estimation, antagonist co-activation, space flight.
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
To gain further understanding of how the human neuromotor system accommodates to gravity, we studied the activation of motor pools before, during and after a 17-day space flight while performing well-defined motor tasks and compared the activation properties of extensor muscles with that of their flexor antagonists. We also examined the chronic activity levels of selected leg flexor and extensor motor pools that work directly against gravity to maintain an upright position. The results suggest that the space flight environment imposes acute [e.g. elevated soleus (Sol) electromyographic (EMG) amplitude during plantarflexion on the first flight day] and chronic [e.g. persistently high tibialis anterior (TA) EMG during dorsiflexion] effects on the activation properties of motor pools that have different antigravity functions on Earth.
![]() |
Materials and methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Experimental protocol
The control of ankle plantarflexion and dorsiflexion was tested using a torque-velocity dynamometer (TVD; Laboratory of Swiss Federal Institute of Technology). Test days were 30 and 12 days before launch (L-), flight days (FD) 2 or 3, 7 or 8 and 13 or 14 and 0, 2, 8 and 15 days after flight (R+).
EMG activity of the Sol and medial gastrocnemius (MG), two primary plantarflexors, and the TA, a primary dorsiflexor, was recorded using bipolar skin surface electrodes (Multi Bio Sensors Inc., 2.5cm center to center). Electrodes were placed directly over the belly of the muscles at locations marked with permanent ink. EMG signals were amplified using custom-made amplifiers with a gain of 1000 that were attached around the waist. The EMG leads were secured to the legs as they projected from the amplifier. Each series of motor control tests was performed with the same electrode placement as was used to record normal routine activities. During TVD testing, the signals were sampled with 12-bit resolution at a sampling rate of 1kHz and stored on an IBM ThinkPad hard drive.
Motor control testing paradigm
For all motor control testing, the subjects were secured in a supine position with the head slightly elevated. The center of rotation of the TVD was aligned with the axis of rotation of the ankle. The TVD output signals were proportional to the torque and angular movement of the joint. When testing the ankle, the right knee was fixed at approximately 160°. The ankle was positioned at 120° (i.e. slightly plantarflexed) for testing of the dorsiflexors and at 90° for testing the plantarflexors. Subjects were first requested to provide a series of isometric sub-maximal and maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs, three trials at five levels of MVC). The computer detected the force generated during the highest MVC and used this value as a basis for feedback to the subject during the test. MVCs were obtained approximately 1520min prior to the constant torque tests.
The experimental task consisted of maintaining a targeted torque output while a 10° peak-to-peak passive sinusoidal motion (±5° from the previously stated joint angles) was imposed on the ankle joint for eight cycles at 0.5Hz. The subjects were prompted via a computer monitor to push (plantarflexor activation) or pull (dorsiflexor activation) and maintain either 10 or 50% MVC. The subjects were provided momentary force feedback on the computer screen, i.e. the target torque was displayed for 2s at the beginning of each test. The same series of tests was repeated with a constant visual display of the target torque (data not shown). The exact sequence of the commands was (i) push at 10% MVC, (ii) pull at 10% MVC, (iii) push at 50% MVC and (iv) pull at 50% MVC. The TVD repositioned the ankle after each test. The duration of each test was 24s followed by 8s of rest as the TVD was repositioned.
Data processing
Rectified EMG signals were averaged across each individual task using customized software developed in-house using LabVIEW (National Instruments, Austin, TX, USA). These values were normalized to the maximal EMG value for the corresponding muscle recorded during an isometric MVC for that same test day. Normalized EMG amplitude was plotted versus test day for each task. The average torque in newton-meters (Nm) across the eight cycles for each task, e.g. push 10% MVC at 0.5Hz, was calculated and expressed as a percentage of the MVC.
EMG data were also recorded on analog tape for 24h periods using an analog tape recorder (TEAC model HR-401 TEAC Corp., Montebello, CA, USA; mass 588g). One tape was required for each 12h recording period. The recordings were digitized later at 1000Hz and archived on CDs. The EMG data files were then processed using customized LabVIEW software. All the data were initially reviewed using interactive software to display the EMG signals on a computer monitor. Periods of interference were identified and entered into a spreadsheet file. These periods amounted to only a few seconds each day. A spreadsheet file of the data was used by a second program to identify and analyze acceptable EMG data from the subjects. The analysis program rectified the EMG data, calculated averages for successive 40ms segments throughout the day and constructed amplitude histograms from the averages. The averaging process approximated a low-pass filter with a cut-off of 12.5Hz. Integrated EMG levels were calculated by summing the product of the amplitude represented by each bin and the bin count. Histograms of baseline noise were used to determine which bins represented zero activity. This was typically the first two or three bins of the histograms. Counts in the remaining bins were used to calculate the duration of the activity.
Statistical analyses
Differences in torque output and normalized EMG amplitudes during motor control tasks and chronic EMG amplitudes were compared using repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Multivariate ANOVA (MANOVA), which adjusts for the correlation due to repeated measurements on the same subjects, was not possible because the number of repeated measures exceeded the total number of subjects. Therefore, univariate analyses were performed using the HuynhFeldt procedure, which corrects for repeated measurements by adjusting the F-value prior to the probability estimate. For incomplete data sets (see figure legends), the mean of the three available subjects was used as the missing value to compute the ANOVAs; however, all figures depict means ± S.E.M. for the available subjects. No plantarflexor torque is reported for the first day of flight because of technical problems on that test day. If recordings were made on fewer than three subjects on any test day, no data are reported. Because we also were interested in the acute adaptations to and recovery from space flight, contrasts were used to compare specific test days. Similarly, linear combination contrasts were used to compare the combined pre-flight, in-flight and post-flight test days. All analyses were performed using SuperAnova statistical software (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA, USA) and Apple Macintosh microcomputers.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
|
Dorsiflexor torques
When the subjects attempted to maintain a constant level of dorsiflexion torque at 10 or 50% MVC during the oscillating tasks, the torques exerted were not significantly different pre-, in- or post-flight (Fig.3).
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
A differential effect of microgravity on perception of force during plantarflexion versus dorsiflexion
A fundamental assumption in the design and interpretation of the present experiments is that the generation of a force with the intent to match a requested or targeted force in the absence of continuous feedback reflects the perceived level of effort as well as the ability of the muscular components to respond to a given motor command. The perceived levels of force generated are presumably a function of the ensemble of proprioceptive afferent feedback from the entire body, although the predominant input is probably derived more directly from the working joints and associated muscles and tendons (Jones, 1986). Assuming that no changes occurred in the muscular components over time, then the altered force output observed in the present study could reflect space-flight-induced changes in afferent input and its interpretation. Although some decrement in the force potential, as measured from single muscle fibers, was reported for these subjects during this space flight mission (Widrick et al., 1999) and Narici et al. (Narici et al., 1997) found a reduced peak torque following electrical stimulation of the plantarflexors, the MVC torques that we measured during plantarflexion were unaffected (McCall et al., 1999). It does not appear that the present results can be explained by a change in the muscle output potential, given that the predominant changes observed in all the measurements taken occurred on the first flight day and on the day of return to Earth from flight. Further, it has been reported that muscle spindle activity is attenuated in microgravity in response to tonic vibration (Lackner and DiZio, 1992). These authors also suggested that microgravity results in reduced muscle co-activation and joint stiffness through modulation of muscle spindle activity via otolith, somatosensory and proprioceptive receptors. We suggest that the present results are attributable to alterations in the sensory information and/or the central processing of this information rather than to a change in the muscle output potential.
The EMG responses reflect several changes that seem to have been part of the neural strategy to adjust to the imposed gravitational environments. There was no evidence in the present study that activation levels shifted towards the faster motor pools, i.e. from the Sol to the MG, and away from the slower motor pools as was found in the rhesus monkey after approximately 2 weeks of space flight (Recktenwald et al., 1999; Roy et al., 1996). In the 50% MVC plantarflexor tasks, the Sol EMG amplitudes were higher in- than pre- or post-flight. However, the level of activation of the TA was also elevated during some of the plantarflexion tasks during flight (Fig.2). This, in itself, might be considered evidence of a persistent flexor bias during flight except that during dorsiflexion tasks there was also an elevated level of activation of the antagonist muscles, i.e. the Sol and MG. In general, it appears that the adaptive strategy to perform either the plantarflexor or dorsiflexor tasks during flight was to generate a stiffer ankle joint by increasing the level of co-activation of agonists and antagonists. Theoretically, the higher levels of contraction of a muscle could improve the ability to perceive joint position accurately (Gandevia and McCloskey, 1977a; Gandevia and McCloskey, 1977b; McCloskey et al., 1983; Gandevia, 1987).
Numerous approaches have been used to study the accuracy of the perception of muscular efforts (Gandevia and McCloskey, 1977a; Gandevia and McCloskey, 1977b; Cafarelli and Bigland-Ritchie, 1979; Cooper et al., 1979; Jones and Hunter, 1982). Subjects have been asked to estimate muscle output as a percentage of maximum while pushing isometrically or by way of a contralateral force-matching task (Gandevia and McCloskey, 1977a; Gandevia and McCloskey, 1977b; Cafarelli and Bigland-Ritchie, 1979; Jones and Hunter, 1982). Our approach differs from the above-mentioned studies in that the subjects were asked to maintain a constant and targeted level of torque output while the joint was oscillated passively over a 10° range of motion and the task was to match a torque perceived from the limb performing the task. Thus, to maintain a constant plantarflexor or dorsiflexor torque, the subject had to activate a muscle group in alternating concentric and eccentric contractions. It should be noted also that the torque output was maintained without continuous visual feedback of the actual torque output being generated. However, a brief cue on the computer screen for the appropriate torque was given for 2s at the beginning of a series of sine-wave cycles. One might have predicted that the more complex task of maintaining a targeted torque while the limb position was oscillating and to maintain a constant torque regardless of whether the muscular effort was in an eccentric or concentric mode would have manifested a much greater impairment in the ability to exert a targeted torque as a result of space flight than was actually observed.
How does space flight on the shuttle change routine activity patterns in plantarflexors and dorsiflexors of the ankle?
One factor that might be expected to affect how the neuromuscular system adapts to a microgravity environment is how the environment alters the pattern of use of a muscle. In other words, to what extent are the adaptations a use-dependent phenomenon? From this perspective, a major limitation in understanding the mechanisms of adaptation of the neuromuscular system to space flight in any animal has been the dearth of information associated with how the microgravity, or more generally the space flight, environment affects the activity patterns of the neuromuscular system. For this reason, we studied the levels of activation of two muscles that serve as plantarflexors and one that serves as a dorsiflexor during routine activities on Earth and during flight. It is often assumed that space flight is a model of disuse of muscles. The present results clearly demonstrate that this is not the case. When we unloaded the hindlimbs of rats for 4 weeks (Alford et al., 1987), the amount of EMG activity in the TA was elevated markedly, whereas the activity levels in the MG and Sol were reduced slightly, but these extensor muscles remained modestly active. Long-term recordings in the human subjects of the present study were similar to those observed in the hindlimbs of these chronically unloaded rats, particularly with respect to the TA.
We suggest that the elevated EMG activity in the TA is due, in part, to a lack of reciprocal inhibition that is routinely derived from the activation of extensors during weight bearing (DeLuca and Mambrito, 1987). It is also likely that some of the elevated activity in the TA can be attributed to the motor tasks performed routinely during flight, i.e. securing the body in a given position using foot loops. Activation of the dorsiflexors occurs routinely when the foot is placed in these loops. However, on the basis of both the total integrated EMG activity and the duration of all the periods when EMG activity was present, it would appear that the use of the loops cannot be the only explanation for the elevated activity in the TA.
It is also of interest that there was no reduction in the level of total daily activation of the MG or Sol during space flight and, in fact, Sol activity was higher during flight. Some of the EMG activity in these muscles must be attributed to the busy work schedule of each crew member during flight, during which there must be some alternating flexion and extension movements just to maintain the necessary body positions during spontaneous or programmed activities. It also is important to understand that numerous experiments on this particular flight involved extensive neuromuscular testing as well as participation in varying levels of daily exercise routines. From this perspective, the activation levels recorded cannot be attributed solely to the microgravity environment. The data more accurately reflect how the activation patterns of the neuromuscular system respond to a series of programmed motor tasks in a microgravity environment.
Concluding remarks
The ability to estimate and execute a requested ankle plantarflexor or dorsiflexor torque during a dynamic task was altered by space flight, which induced a flexor bias in routine, and perhaps in programmed motor tasks. These results show that, during routine daily activities in-flight, the dorsiflexors become hyperactive, whereas the plantarflexors maintain a normal or elevated level of activation. To understand better how animals adapt to microgravity, future studies need to carefully document detailed activity patterns of multiple motor pools controlling limb, trunk and head movements during flight compared with those occurring on Earth. Because of the large quantity of exercise performed during flight in the present study, a clear understanding of the true effects of microgravity cannot be gained and generalized to all studies of microgravity.
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Alford, E. K., Roy, R. R., Hodgson, J. A. and Edgerton, V. R. (1987). Electromyography of rat soleus, medial gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior during hindlimb suspension. Exp. Neurol. 96, 635649.[Medline]
Baker, J. T., Nicogossian, A. E., Hoffler, G. W., Johnson, R. L. and Hordinsky, J. (1977). Measurement of a single tendon reflex in conjunction with myogram: the second manned skylab mission. In Biomedical Results from Skylab (ed. R. S. Johnston and L. F. Dietlein), p. 131. Washington, DC: NASA SP-377.
Cafarelli, E. and Bigland-Ritchie, B. (1979). Sensation of static force in muscles of different length. Exp. Neurol. 65, 511525.[Medline]
Chekirda, I. F., Bogdashevskiy, R. B., Yeremin, A. V. and Kolosov, I. A. (1970). Coordination structure of walking of Soyuz-9 crew members before and after flight. Kosmicheskaya Biologiya I Meditsina 5, 4852.
Clement, G., Gurfinkel, V. S. and Lestienne, F. (1985). Mechanisms of posture maintenance in weightlessness. In Vestibular and Visual Control on Posture and Locomotor Equilibrium (ed. M. Igarshi and I. Black), pp. 158163. Basel: Karger.
Cooper, D. F., Grimby, G., Jones, D. A. and Edwards, R. H. T. (1979). Perception of effort in isometric and dynamic muscular contraction. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 41, 173180.
DeLuca, C. J. and Mambrito, B. (1987). Voluntary control of motor units in human antagonist muscles: coactivation and reciprocal activation. J. Neurophysiol. 58, 525542.
Edgerton, V. R. and Roy, R. R. (1996). Neuromuscular adaptations to actual and simulated space flight. In Handbook of Physiology. Environmental Physiology, vol. 1, section 4 (ed. M. J. Fregly and C. M. Blatteis), pp. 721763. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fisk, J., Lackner, J. R. and DiZio, P. (1993). Gravitoinertial force level influences arm movement control. J. Neurophysiol. 69, 504511.
Gandevia, S. C. (1987). Roles for perceived voluntary motor commands in motor control. Trends Neurosci. 10, 8185.
Gandevia, S. C. and McCloskey, D. I. (1977a). Effects of related sensory inputs on motor performances in man studied through changes in perceived heaviness. J. Physiol., Lond. 272, 653672.[Medline]
Gandevia, S. C. and McCloskey, D. I. (1977b). Changes in motor commands, as shown by changes in perceived heaviness, during partial curarization and peripheral anaesthesia in man. J. Physiol., Lond. 272, 673689.[Medline]
Grillner, S. (1981). Control of locomotion in bipeds, tetrapods and fish. In Handbook of Physiology, the Nervous System, Motor Control, vol. 2, part 1, section 1 (ed. J. M. Brookhart and V. B. Mountcastle), pp. 11791236. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society.
Jones, L. A. (1986). Perception of force and weight: theory and research. Psychol. Bull. 100, 2942.[Medline]
Jones, L. A. and Hunter, I. W. (1982). Force sensation in isometric contractions: a relative force effect. Brain Res. 244, 186189.[Medline]
Kozlovskaya, I. B., Dmitrieval, I. F., Grigorieva, L. S., Kirenskaya, A. and Kreidich, Y. (1988). Gravitational mechanisms in the motor system. Studies in real and simulated weightlessness. In Stance and Motion: Facts and Concepts (ed. V. S. Gurfinkel, M. E. Ioffe, J. Massion and J. P. Roll), pp. 3748. New York: Plenum.
Kozlovskaya, I. B., Kreidich, Y. V. and Rakhmanov, A. S. (1981). Mechanisms of the effects of weightlessness on the motor system of man. Physiologist 24, 559564.
Lackner, J. R. and DiZio, P. (1992). Gravitoinertial force level affects the appreciation of limb position during muscle vibration. Brain Res. 592, 175180.[Medline]
McCall, G. E., Goulet, C., Roy, R. R., Grindeland, R. E., Boorman, G. I., Bigbee, A. J., Hodgson, J. A., Greenisen, M. C. and Edgerton, V. R. (1999). Space flight suppresses exercise-induced release of bioassayable growth hormone. J. Appl. Physiol. 87, 12071212.
McCloskey, D. I., Gandevia, S. C., Potter, E. K. and Colebatch, J. G. (1983). Muscle sense and effort: motor commands and judgements about muscular contractions. In Motor Control Mechanisms in Health and Disease (ed. J. E. Desmedt), pp. 151167. New York: Raven Press.
Narici, M. V., Kayser, B., Barattini, P. and Cerretelli, P. (1997). Changes in electrically evoked skeletal muscle contractions during 17-day space flight and bed rest. Int. J. Sports Med. 18 (Suppl. 4), S290S292.[Medline]
Recktenwald, M. R., Hodgson, J. A., Roy, R. R., Riazanski, S., McCall, G. E., Kozlovskaya, I., Washburn, D. A., Fanton, J. W. and Edgerton, V. R. (1999). Effects of space flight on rhesus quadrupedal locomotion after return to 1G. J. Neurophysiol. 81, 24512463.
Roy, R. R., Hodgson, J. A., Aragon, J., Day, M. K., Koslovskaya, I. B. and Edgerton, V. R. (1996). Recruitment of the Rhesus soleus and medial gastrocnemius before, during and after space flight. J. Grav. Physiol. 3, 1116.[Medline]
Widrick, J. J., Knuth, S. T., Norenberg, K. M., Romatowski, J. G., Bain, J. L., Riley, D. A., Karhanek, M., Trappe, S. W., Trappe, T. A., Costill, D. L. and Fitts, R. H. (1999). Effect of a 17 day space flight on contractile properties of human soleus muscle fibres. J. Physiol., Lond. 516, 915930.