The use of ground-borne vibrations for prey localization in the Saharan sand vipers (Cerastes)
Department of Biology, Lafayette College, Easton, PA 18042, USA
*e-mail: youngab{at}lafayette.edu
Accepted 10 December 2001
![]() |
Summary |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: feeding, prey capture, Reptilia, squamata, audition, behaviour, Saharan sand viper, Cerastes cerastes.
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Haverly and Kardong (1996) found that presenting motionless prey to rattlesnakes deprived of infrared and visual stimuli increased the duration to approach/strike fourfold, but this difference was not significant, and the authors concluded that vibration reception was not important for rattlesnake predation. The experimental design of most other studies on the sensory bases of snake predation have ignored vibrational stimuli (either ground-borne or airborne), perhaps reflecting the common view that snakes are incapable of responding to vibrations. Wever (1978
) provided physiological evidence that snakes could perceive airborne and ground-borne vibrations, and Hartline (1971a
,b
) confirmed these findings and demonstrated that snakes can perceive vibrations both through their inner ears and from the body surface (termed somatic hearing). Although a fundamental frequency imbalance between vibrational sensitivity and sound production appears to minimize the potential for intraspecific acoustic communication in snakes (Young, 1998
), vibration detection may be an important aspect of interspecific interactions. A recent study attempted to quantify the distance over which snakes could detect prey items and identified particular habitats, including fossoriality, where vibration detection would be particularly important (Young et al., 2000
).
The genus Cerastes consists of two species which inhabit the loose sand of the Saharan desert. These snakes are ambush predators that capture small rodents and lizards while fully or partially submerged in the sand (e.g. Schleich et al., 1996). The purpose of this paper was to determine whether Cerastes could use vibrational stimuli to locate its potential prey; if so, this would represent the first experimental evidence for vibration detection leading to an ecologically important behavioral response in snakes.
![]() |
Materials and methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
A 2 mx2 mx0.5 m high filming base was constructed of plywood. The filming base was elevated off the floor with wood beams 10 cm2 in cross section; the joints between the beams and the floor and between the beams and the filming base were filled with vibration-dampening pads (Fisher). The filming base was filled to a depth of approximately 20 cm with clean dry sand. In the center of this filming base, on the surface of the sand, was positioned a 1 mx1 mx0.1 m filming cage constructed of Plexiglas. The filming cage had no bottom (it rested on the sand of the filming base), but it had a hinged Plexiglas top. Directly above the filming base, suspended from the ceiling of the laboratory, was a two-dimensional camera dolley which supported a 1000S high-speed digital video camera (Redlake Instruments). Using a series of pulleys and cables, the video camera could be positioned directly over the snake. The filming cage and the snake within it were heated with two 250 W infrared heat lamps.
Experiment 1
The first experiment involved three phases. In the first phase, the control, specimens of C. cerastes were placed individually in the filming chamber for a period of at least 12 h; the heat lamps came on automatically for the last 7 h and heated the sand surface of the filming chamber to a temperature of 28.531°C (measured with a probe buried in the center of the filming cage). Immediately prior to the trial, the heat lamps were turned off and the filming cage was illuminated with a Northstar photographic light (Photographic Analysis). A single live mouse (mass 10.05±0.86 g, mean ± S.E.M.) was released into the filming cage at the furthest point from the head of the specimen. The mouse was allowed to move unrestrained until prey capture occurred. The prey capture strike was filmed at 500 frames s1 with a shutter speed of 1/20 000 s. The digital record was streamed to a PowerMac 8500 (Apple) and saved using Premiere 4.0 (Adobe). Using Image 1.6.2 (N.I.H.), the distance from the snakes snout to the mid-body of the mouse was quantified, as was the angle between the long axis of the snakes head and the mid-body of the mouse and the terminal velocity of the strike (defined as the mean velocity over the last 8 ms of the strike before contact). Each snake was filmed at most once every 7 days; at times, the interval between predation bouts exceeded 2 weeks. In total, 18 strikes were recorded, roughly evenly divided among the four specimens.
For the second phase of the experiment, the snakes were anesthetized by exposure to Isoflurane. Once fully anesthetized, the snakes were placed on a heated surgical table (VSSI) and prepared for sterile surgery. An incision was made near the naso-frontal joint, and the nasal and vomeronasal nerves were isolated, severed and mechanically disrupted. The specimens were given 2 weeks to recover and then presented with mice (mass 9.38±0.65 g; mean ± S.E.M.) as described above for the control trials. In total, 18 strikes, roughly evenly divided between the four snakes, were analyzed during the second phase of the experiment.
For the third phase of the experiment, the same four snakes were briefly anesthetized with Isoflurane, and small pieces of surgical tape were placed over each eye. The outer surface of the surgical tape was painted with a non-toxic black paint (RoseArt). A third series of trials was performed as described above, except that, before each trial, the snake was lightly restrained and a fresh coat of black paint was applied over the eyes. Functional blindness of the snake was assayed before each trial by the visual appearance of the eye and the failure of the snake to respond to movements of the researchers. In total, 16 strikes, roughly evenly divided among the specimens, were recorded at live mice with a mass of 8.78±0.71 g (mean ± S.E.M.).
Experiment 2
The second experiment was performed using the four denervated, temporarily blinded Cerastes cerastes (described above). The targets for these experiments were Styrofoam balls with a diameter of 3.8 cm. The balls were rinsed in distilled water and only handled with surgical gloves. One ball was placed in the center of the filming cage, the other was placed in front of a radiant heater. The heat lamps were used to heat the sand in the filming cage and the target ball to approximately 29.5°C; the radiant heater warmed the surface of the second target ball to approximately 37.8°C (determined using the surface probe of a 100 A digital thermometer; VWR). Individual snakes were placed in the cage and allowed to adopt the typical predatory posture (see below), and a 2 min control period was then recorded using a standard video camera (Handycam, Sony). The target ball was manipulated using a tack attached to the end of a 1 m long balsa-wood dowel (diameter of 4 mm); the target ball was used to tap the surface of the sand gently in the region of the snakes head. Care was taken not to touch the snake with the target ball. The target ball was presented for 30 s, and the snakes response was video-recorded. The snake was given 5 min to recover, and the second target ball was then presented in the same fashion. The order of presentation of the two target balls (isothermic and heated) was alternated, and four trials were recorded from each snake. From the video recordings of each trial (containing two control and two experimental periods), the total number of tongue flicks, head movements and strikes was quantified. Any struck target was replaced prior to the next trial.
All experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with established procedures for research on ectothermic vertebrates and venomous snakes. The experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Lafayette College.
Results are presented as means ± S.E.M.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Experiment 1
The analysis of the control strikes revealed the diversity of strike angle in Cerastes cerastes (Fig. 1A). Control strikes had a mean distance to target of 5.27±0.69 cm (N=18) and a mean strike velocity of 116.2±7.6 cm s1. Predatory encounters recorded following recovery from the denervation surgery revealed no behavioral changes (the snakes still waited in ambush with the head partially buried and little or no tongue-flicking). The strikes still exhibited considerable angular variation (Fig. 1B), the distance to target (7.02±0.95 cm, N=18) and velocity of the strike (125.84±6.91 cm s1) were greater than in the controls, but not significantly so.
|
The angular distributions of the strikes were divided into 30° intervals (defined from the long axis of the head) with strikes pooled from the left and right sides of the snake. The results reveal the prevalence of straight (030°) strikes in the denervated, temporarily blinded specimens, and the scarcity of strikes with angular deflections over 90° during these same trials (Fig. 2). The prey targets used were fairly small to prevent satiation and defensive behaviors. The accuracy of the strike was gauged by determining the number of strikes from each trial in which the snake hit the mouse with both fangs (bilateral strike), only one fang (unilateral strike) or no fangs (missed strike). In both the control and denervated trials, bilateral strikes were the most common, followed by unilateral, then missed strikes; in contrast, in the denervated, temporarily blinded trials, there were nearly equal number of bilateral, unilateral and missed strikes (Fig. 3). Pooling the data from the three trials revealed a significant relationship between increasing prey mass and increasing distance to target at strike (b=0.53, t=11, P<0.001, r2=0.72) as well as between increasing distance to target and strike velocity (b=16.06, t=11, P<0.001, r2=0.69).
|
|
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
While deprived of chemosensory information and temporarily blinded, every snake was able to locate freely mobile prey in every trial. Even in cases where the strike missed, the error was not pronounced (normally the snake struck just to the side of the mouse) and the prey was captured in a subsequent strike. Larger prey, which presumably generated higher-amplitude ground-borne vibrations, evoked strikes from greater distances than did smaller prey. Previous studies have suggested that snakes, even taxa such as Cerastes that lack the prominent infrared receptive pits on the cepahlic scalation, may respond to the body heat of prey items (Dickman et al., 1987; Austin and Gregory, 1998
). Analysis of the predatory strikes, particularly the observations that strikes were always launched after footfalls, suggested that vibration reception, rather than thermal stimuli, was being used to locate the prey.
The second experiment was designed to separate these two stimulus sources. Presentation of the artificial stimulus was associated with significant increases in tongue-flicks, head movements and strikes (Fig. 4) despite the fact that the control periods were four times the duration of the experimental periods. The presentation of a chemosensory-free target that was isothermic to the surrounding environment still elicited a strong response, including successful strikes, from the specimens. Furthermore, the video recordings suggest that these behavioral responses were temporally linked to impact of the artificial target with the substratum. No significant differences in response were observed between the two targets, despite the fact that one was approximately 8° warmer (approximating mammalian body temperature).
Previous studies have documented the importance of chemosensory (e.g. Chiszar et al., 1999; Miller and Gutzke, 1999
), visual (e.g. Mullin and Cooper, 1998
) and thermal (e.g. Grace et al., 2001
) stimuli in ophidian behavior; however, most previous studies on the sensory bases of snake behavior have explicitly, or implicitly, ignored vibrational stimuli. Early workers (e.g. Klauber, 1956
; Wharton, 1969
) speculated about vibration-based behavioral responses in snakes, but this is the first study to link ground-borne vibration to a behavior as ecologically important as prey localization.
An earlier theoretical study (Young et al., 2000) suggested that fossorial snakes, such as Cerastes, would be more likely to use vibration detection during foraging. The results of the current study are similar to those of Hetherington (1992
), who demonstrated that Scincus scincus, a fossorial sand-dwelling lizard, uses ground-borne vibrations to locate insect prey. Our observations of foraging behavior in snakes suggest that other species, particularly fossorial forms such as Xenopeltis unicolor and Loxocemus bicolor, may rely, at least in part, on vibration detection for prey localization and possibly as a stimulus for other behavioral responses.
There is an important distinction to be made between perception (the apprehension of vibrational stimuli through the sensory system) and hearing (the subjective appreciation of external sounds). Earlier physiological studies (Hartline, 1971a,b
; Wever, 1978
) demonstrated the ability of snakes to perceive air-borne and ground-borne vibrations. In the present study, we document a suite of subjective responses, tongue-flicking, head movements and striking, to vibrations caused by both live prey and artificial targets. The present study provides evidence that snakes are capable of hearing, albeit, perhaps, in a unique sense of that term.
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Austin, J. D. and Gregory, P. T. (1998). Relative roles of thermal and chemical cues in the investigative behavior of prey in colubrid (Elaphe guttata and Lampropeltis getulus) and boid (Python regius) snakes. Herpetol. Nat. Hist. 6, 4750.
Bonnet, X., Bradshaw, D., Shine, R. and Pearson, D. (1999). Why do snakes have eyes? The (non-)effect of blindness in island tiger snakes (Notechis scutatus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 46, 267272.
Chiszar, D., Walters, A., Urbaniak, J., Smith, H. M. and Mackessy, S. P. (1999). Discrimination between envenomated and nonenvenomated prey by western diamondback rattlesnakes (Crotalus atrox): chemosensory consequences of venom. Copeia 1999, 640648.
Dickman, D. J., Colton, J. S., Chiszar, D. and Colton, C. A. (1987). Trigeminal responses to thermal stimulation of the oral cavity in rattlesnakes (Crotalus viridis) before and after bilateral anesthetisation of the facial pit organ. Brain Res. 400, 365370.[Medline]
Ford, N. B. and Burghardt, G. M. (1993). Perceptual mechanisms and the behavioral ecology of snakes. In Snakes: Ecology and Behavior (ed. R. A. Seigel and J. T. Collins), pp. 117164. New York: McGraw Hill.
Garcia, C. M. and Drummond, H. (1995). Components of visual prey recognition by the Mexican aquatic garter snake Thamnophis melanogaster. Ethology 101, 101111.
Grace, M. S., Woodward, O. M., Church, D. R. and Calish, G. (2001). Prey targeting by the infrared-imaging snake Python: Effects of experimental and congenital visual deprivation. Behav. Brain Res. 119, 2331.[Medline]
Hartline, P. (1971a). Physiological basis for detection of sound and vibration in snakes. J. Exp. Biol. 54, 349371.[Medline]
Hartline, P. (1971b). Midbrain responses to the auditory and somatic vibration system in snakes. J. Exp. Biol. 54, 373390.[Medline]
Haverly, J. E. and Kardong, K. V. (1996). Sensory deprivation effects on the predatory behavior of the rattlesnake Crotalus viridis oreganus. Copeia 1996, 419428.
Hetherington, T. E. (1992). Behavioral uses of seismic cues by the sandswimming lizard Scincus scincus. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 4, 514.
Kardong, K. V. and Mackessy, S. P. (1991). The strike behavior of a congenitally blind rattlesnake. J. Herpetol. 25, 208211.
Klauber, L. (1956). Rattlesnakes: Their Habits, Life Histories and Influence on Mankind. Two volumes. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Miller, L. R. and Gutzke, W. H. N. (1999). The role of the vomeronasal organ of crotalines (Reptilia: Serpentes: Viperidae) in predator detection. Anim. Behav. 58, 5357.[Medline]
Mullin, S. J. and Cooper, R. J. (1998). The foraging ecology of the gray rat snake (Elaphe obsoleta spiloides) visual stimuli facilitate location of arboreal prey. Am. Midl. Nat. 140, 397401.
Schleich, H. H., Kastle, W. and Kabisch, K. (1996). Amphibians and Reptiles of North Africa. Koenigstein: Koeltz Scientific Publishers.
Shivik, J. A. (1998). Brown tree snake response to visual and olfactory cues. J. Wildl. Mgmnt. 62, 105111.
Shivik, J. A., Bourassa, J. and Donnigan, S. N. (2000). Elicitation of brown treesnake predatory behavior using polymodal stimuli. J. Wildl. Mgmnt. 64, 969975.
Wever, E. (1978). The Reptile Ear. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wharton, C. H. (1969). The cottonmouth moccasin on Sea Horse Key, Florida. Bull. Florida State Mus. 14, 227272.
Young, B. A. (1998). On the acoustic biology of snakes. Lit. Serpent. 18, 8491.
Young, B. A., Marvin, J. and Marosi, K. (2000). The potential significance of ground-borne vibration to predatorprey relationships in snakes. Hamadryad 25, 164174.