Cone-based vision of rats for ultraviolet and visible lights
Neuroscience Research Institute and Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
*Author for correspondence (e-mail: jacobs{at}psych.ucsb.edu)
Accepted April 19, 2001
![]() |
Summary |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: rat, Rattus norvegicus, vision, cones, spectral sensitivity, color vision, ultraviolet sensitivity, electroretinogram.
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Although vertebrates drawn from many groups have cone pigments with specific sensitivity in the ultraviolet (UV), for instance some birds, fishes, amphibians and reptiles, it was long believed that the absorption peaks of all mammalian short-wavelength cone pigments lay within the spectral range of approximately 415450nm (Goldsmith, 1994; Jacobs, 1992). About 10 years ago, however, it was discovered that the retinas of several common types of rodent (mice, rats, gophers, gerbils) contained photopigments with peak sensitivity well down into the UV range (Jacobs et al., 1991). Here, we report a series of measurements of visual sensitivity in rats. Of interest are the contributions of cone photopigments to vision in a nocturnal animal.
Cone pigments and cone representation in the rat
There is good agreement on the nature of the cone pigments of the rat. Measurements made with the electroretinogram (ERG) and behavioral tests indicate that one pigment has a peak at approximately 510nm (Neitz and Jacobs, 1986), while spectrophotometric measurements made of pigment reconstituted in an artificial expression system give an equivalent value of 509nm (Radlwimmer and Yokoyama, 1998). Hereafter, we refer to this as the M-cone pigment. Spectra measured in reconstituted photopigment gives a peak value for the rat UV pigment of 358nm (Yokoyama et al., 1998), again in good agreement with earlier ERG measurements that yielded a peak at 359nm (Deegan II and Jacobs, 1993). Template-based representations of the absorption spectra for pigments with peaks at 359 and 509nm are shown in Fig.1A. A limitation of the direct measurements of the M pigment is that they do not provide an account of the absorption of this pigment in the short wavelengths of the precision necessary for studies of sensitivity in the UV. To predict that sensitivity, we assume in Fig.1 that the spectral positioning and shape of the secondary absorption peak (ß-band) of the M-cone pigment of the rat is like that suggested by direct electrophysiological measurements of cones in a cyprinid fish, Danio aequipinnatus (Palacios et al., 1996).
|
The relative spectral sensitivities of rat cones can be derived from the estimates of the relative numbers of cones and photopigment spectral absorption. Fig.1B shows the relative spectral sensitivity of the two types of rat cone, with the pigment spectra adjusted according to the proportions of the two cone types. These sensitivity curves suggest that rat M cones can potentially provide considerable sensitivity to light in the UV portion of the spectrum.
![]() |
Materials and methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Electrophysiological measurements
Indices of sensitivity in the outer retina were obtained from ERG recordings. Rats were anesthetized with an intramuscular injection of a mixture of xylazine hydrochloride (6.7mgkg-1) and ketamine hydrochloride (100mgkg-1), and the pupil was dilated by topical application of atropine sulfate (0.04%). The sedated animal was placed in a head restraint. Body temperature was held at normal levels through the use of a circulating hot-water heating pad. Electrical signals were sensed from a bipolar contact-lens electrode.
The stimuli were delivered from a three-beam optical system, the output of which was presented in Maxwellian view as a circular field 57° in diameter. In these experiments, a single beam originating from a monochromator (10nm half-bandpass) equipped with a 150W xenon light source was used. A circular neutral density wedge was used to adjust the intensity of this light. The stimuli consisted of 12.5Hz square-wave flicker presented with a duty cycle of 25%.
The methods used to process ERG signals have been described (Jacobs et al., 1996b). In brief, analog hardware was used to window the amplified ERG signal with a sinusoid set to the frequency of the stimulus train (in this case, 12.5Hz). This signal was viewed on a computer display screen. The responses were averaged for the last 50 of 70 stimulus cycles, and the resulting amplitudes were subsequently read directly from a digital display. ERGs were recorded in a room illuminated with overhead fluorescent lights that yielded an ambient illuminance at the test eye of approximately 150lx.
Behavioral measurements
Measurements of rat vision were made using standard operant procedures. Animals were trained in a three-alternative, forced-choice discrimination test using an apparatus described previously (Jacobs, 1983). Subjects viewed three small circular panels mounted along one wall of a test chamber. The rats were free to move about the test chamber and, depending on the position of the animal at the point where visual discriminations were made, the stimulus panels subtended visual angles that fell in the range from 1460°. The panels were transilluminated by an optical system located outside the test chamber. Illumination was provided by two sources, a grating monochromator with a 75W xenon source (half-bandpass, 16nm) and a tungstenhalide lamp. The former served as the test light that, through the use of a mirror system, could illuminate any one of the three panels and, depending on the aim of the experiment, light from the other source could be similarly directed so as to illuminate equally all three of the panels or any two of them. Each rat was trained to select the panel illuminated with the output from the monochromator and indicate its selection by touching that panel. Each correct response was reinforced by the automatic delivery of a 20mg food pellet. The position of the test light was varied randomly across the three panels over successive trials. Test trials were signaled by the occurrence of a cueing tone and terminated when the animal responded, or after 4s without a response. Over trials, the intensity and spectral content of the test light were varied to permit the determination of threshold performance. Trained animals completed 300600 test trials in each daily session. All aspects of stimulus presentation, reinforcement delivery and response monitoring were accomplished under the control of a laboratory computer. Ceiling-mounted fluorescent tubes were used to illuminate the test chamber (ambient illuminance 70lx).
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
|
|
As suggested by the previous experiment, long-wavelength light adaptation indeed produces a significant threshold elevation for UV test lights. The results from this experiment are summarized in Fig.5, in which the threshold elevation for the 390nm test light is plotted against the threshold elevation for the 510nm test light for all of the subjects at each of the background light levels. The continuous line is the best-fitting linear regression (slope=0.71; r2=0.93, P<0.001). The broken line in Fig.5 predicts what would be expected if the two pigments adapted in a univariant fashion. That prediction differs significantly (P<0.01) from the threshold elevation data actually obtained.
|
We first tested animals to determine whether they could discriminate monochromatic test lights from a UV light (produced as described above.) The test light was set to 510nm, and over trials it was presented at the intensity value computed to be equally bright to the UV light and at intensity values that were randomly varied over a range of ±0.6logunit in steps of 0.1logunit from the point of the brightness equation. Following an extensive training period, all three subjects were eventually able successfully to discriminate 510nm light from UV light over the entire range of test light intensities. The wavelength of the test light was then progressively changed in steps of 10nm towards the shorter wavelengths. At each wavelength, the test light was presented at intensity values calculated to be equally bright to the test light and over the additional intensity range indicated above. The asymptotic discrimination performance for the three subjects achieved at the equal brightness settings is shown in Fig.6. Each successfully discriminated between the test light and the UV stimulus until the wavelength of the former was shortened to approximately 400nm. For wavelengths shorter than 400nm, none of the animals showed successful discrimination. In a second test, the direction of the discrimination was reversed, i.e. rats were now trained to select a monochromatic UV test light (370nm) from a 510nm light (10nm half-bandwidth). Controls for brightness cues were instituted in the same fashion as described above. Once this discrimination had been acquired the test light was stepped towards longer wavelengths. The results are also summarized in Fig.6, in which it can be seen that the subjects could successfully discriminate UV light from the 510nm light until the wavelength of the test light was set to approximately 400nm. For wavelengths longer than 400nm, color discrimination failed.
|
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Rat cone vision and the rat visual system
Signals from rodent UV cones were first detected in ERG measurements, and their spectra were assessed by recording ERG responses in the presence of intense long-wavelength adaptation (Jacobs et al., 1991). Under those conditions, UV-cone signals are prominent in the ERG. However, in spectral sensitivity measurements made in the absence of chromatic adaptation, the contribution of UV cones to ERG signals is modest (Fig.2). ERGs obtained for flickering lights are interpreted as reflecting some combination of photoreceptor and bipolar cell signals (Bush and Sieving, 1996). As judged by the cone template fits, the relative contributions from rat UV- and M-cone types to the ERG flicker signal are not far from what would be predicted if the two cone classes simply contribute to the signal in accord with their relative numbers. The picture is quite different for the increment-threshold behavioral measurements (Fig.3, Fig.4) where the template fits suggest a 4050% relative contribution from the UV cones as opposed to around 17% in the ERG signal. Somewhere beyond the outer retina, there is a clear enhancement in the relative strength of the UV cone signals.
Recent work makes it clear that, with the exception of the primate fovea, there is considerable commonality of structural organization in the retinas of all mammals (Boycott and Wassle, 1999; Jeon et al., 1998). For instance, it has been noted that the density of cones in a number of mammalian retinas (including the rat) is similar to that found in the peripheral retina of primates (Boycott and Wassle, 1999). There are perhaps ten discrete and structurally analogous classes of bipolar cell in both rat and primate retina. In the monkey, nine of these are believed to transmit cone signals to the inner retina (Boycott and Wassle, 1999) and, with one exception, all of them appear to be connected to middle-wavelength-sensitive (M) or long-wavelength-sensitive (L) cones or to both these cone types. The analogous bipolar cells of the rat retina probably, therefore, contact the M cones. The primate retina also contains a class of bipolar cell that selectively contacts S cones and transfers these signals to the inner plexiform layer. Again, structurally similar cells are found in the rat retina, and it seems reasonable to suppose that they transmit signals originating in the UV cones. The greater prominence of the UV-cone signal seen in behavioral measurements probably reflects differential gain mechanisms for UV- and M-cone signals. The comparison of ERG and behavioral spectra suggests that these gains could be applied at locations in the inner retina or deeper in the visual system.
Fig.6 illustrates the fact that rats can be trained to perform dichromatic color discriminations. At least for mammals, this would ordinarily be interpreted to imply the presence of spectral opponent mechanisms in the visual system. We are not aware of any results from electrophysiological experiments that document the presence of such cells in rats. However, the cone photopigments of the mouse retina are nearly identical to those of the rat, and it has been reported that approximately 12% of mouse ganglion cells receiving cone signals manifest opponent responses for UV- and M-cone inputs (Ekesten et al., 2000). Interestingly, these authors also detected ganglion cells that receive cone inputs exclusively from UV cones. Depending on the nature of their central connections, either or both of these classes of ganglion cell could contribute information useful for color discriminations. However, even though their cone pigments are similar, there are sufficient differences to suggest that the mouse may not provide a good model for the processing of cone information in the rat. These differences include the facts that: (i) the mouse has relatively more cones than the rat (3% versus 1%) and UV cones outnumber M cones (Szel et al., 1996), (ii) unlike the rat, the spatial distribution of the two cone types is very heterogeneous in the mouse, with M cones completely absent from the ventral retina (Szel et al., 1992), and (iii) some proportion of mouse cones coexpress UV and M pigments (Pugh et al., 1998), while coexpression has not been observed in rat cones (Szel et al., 2000). While it seems likely that some rat ganglion cells have a spectrally opponent organization, the scarcity of rat UV cones suggests that the numbers of such cells may be quite small.
The utility of rat cone vision
These laboratory measurements document what rats can accomplish using cone-based vision with reasonably high light levels, but by their nature say little about how this might translate into seeing under natural circumstances. What is clear from the spectral sensitivity measurements is that, for at least some viewing conditions, rats maintain reasonable visual sensitivity into the UV portion of the spectrum, about equal in fact to their sensitivity to middle-wavelength light. How useful that might be obviously depends on the availability of short-wavelength light. Measurements made in natural habitats indicate a number of environmental circumstances in which, during daylight hours, there is relatively abundant UV radiation (Endler, 1993) and, interestingly, there is a significant increase in the ratio of 360nm:520nm light coming from the sky during the morning and evening twilight hours (Hut et al., 2000). High UV sensitivity would seem likely to be advantageous under those conditions. Rats, however, are nocturnal and, under scotopic conditions, any advantages of UV photoreceptors disappear.
Whether the abilities of rats to make some color discriminations have a practical utility is also unclear. Blue skylight is a particularly rich source of UV irradiance and predominantly long-wavelength targets appearing against such a background, for instance a bird of prey, might provide a circumstance where this color capacity could be usefully employed (although birds may also have evolved countermeasures) (Rowe, 1999). As mentioned above, we found training rats to make color discriminations a challenging task. Specifically, a very large number of training trials were required before the animals could be encouraged to discriminate on the basis of spectral differences rather than brightness differences. The difficulty of providing a demonstration of color vision might reflect the fact that the operant task we employed was not an optimal one, or it may be that color differences normally have only a weak cue value for rat vision. Discriminations involving more naturalistic stimuli might be used to evaluate this possibility.
Finally, in recent years, there have been a number of experiments on the role of UV light in the mammalian circadian system (Amir and Robinson, 1995; Brainard et al., 1994; Hut et al., 2000; Provencio and Foster, 1995). The presence of UV cones in some rodents might well mediate the effects of light on circadian systems. However, UV light entrainment of circadian rhythms is possible even in species that lack a population of UV cones. For example, the Syrian hamster has no UV cones (Calderone and Jacobs, 1999), but can still be entrained to UV light (Hut et al., 2000; von Schantz et al., 1997). The pigment spectra of Fig.1 suggest that the relatively high absorption by the ß-bands of pigments whose primary peaks are around 500nm (which includes both rods and M cones for most rodents) probably provides the initial source of the entrainment signal for rodents lacking UV photopigments.
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Amir, S. and Robinson, B. (1995). Ultraviolet light entrains rodent suprachiasmatic nucleus pacemaker. Neuroscience 69, 10051011.[Medline]
Bowmaker, J. K. (1998). Evolution of colour vision in vertebrates. Eye 12, 541547.[Medline]
Boycott, B. and Wassle, H. (1999). Parallel processing in the mammalian retina. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 40, 13131327.[Medline]
Brainard, G. C., Barker, F. M., Hoffman, R. J., Stetson, M. H., Hanifin, J. P., Podolin, P. L. and Rollag, M. D. (1994). Ultraviolet regulation of neuroendocrine and circadian physiology in rodents. Vision Res. 34, 15211533.[Medline]
Bush, R. A. and Sieving, P. A. (1996). Inner retinal contributions to the primate photopic fast flicker electroretinogram. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 557565.[Medline]
Calderone, J. B. and Jacobs, G. H. (1999). Cone receptor variations and their functional consequences in two species of hamster. Vis. Neurosci. 16, 5363.[Medline]
Deegan II, J. F. and Jacobs, G. H. (1993). On the identity of the cone types of the rat retina. Exp. Eye Res. 56, 375377.[Medline]
Ekesten, B., Gouras, P. and Yamamoto, S. (2000). Cone inputs to murine retinal ganglion cells. Vision Res. 40, 25732577.[Medline]
Endler, J. A. (1993). The color of light in forests and its implications. Ecol. Monogr. 63, 127.
Fasick, J. I., Cronin, T. W., Hunt, D. M. and Robinson, P. R. (1998). The visual pigments of the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). Vis. Neurosci. 15, 643651.[Medline]
Goldsmith, T. H. (1994). Ultraviolet receptors and color vision: Evolutionary implications and a dissonance of paradigms. Vision Res. 34, 14791487.[Medline]
Gorgels, T. G. M. F. and van Norren, D. (1992). Spectral transmittance of the rat lens. Vision Res. 32, 15091512.[Medline]
Hut, R. A., Scheper, A. and Daan, S. (2000). Can the circadian system of a diurnal and a nocturnal rodent entrain to ultraviolet light? J. Comp. Physiol. A 186, 707715.[Medline]
Jacobs, G. H. (1983). Within-species variations in visual capacity among squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus): Sensitivity differences. Vision Res. 23, 239248.[Medline]
Jacobs, G. H. (1992). Ultraviolet vision in vertebrates. Am. Zool. 32, 544554.
Jacobs, G. H. (1993). The distribution and nature of colour vision among the mammals. Biol. Rev. 68, 413 471.[Medline]
Jacobs, G. H., Fenwick, J. C., Calderone, J. B. and Deeb, S. S. (1999). Human cone pigment expressed in transgenic mice yields altered vision. J. Neurosci. 19, 32583265.
Jacobs, G. H., Neitz, J. and Deegan II, J. F. (1991). Retinal receptors in rodents maximally sensitive to ultraviolet light. Nature 353, 655656.[Medline]
Jacobs, G. H., Neitz, M. and Neitz, J. (1996a). Mutations in S-cone pigment genes and the absence of colour vision in two species of nocturnal primate. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263, 705710.[Medline]
Jacobs, G. H., Neitz, J. and Krogh, K. (1996b). Electroretinogram flicker photometry and its applications. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 641648.[Medline]
Jeon, C.-J., Strettoi, E. and Masland, R. H. (1998). The major cell populations of the mouse retina. J. Neurosci. 18, 89368946.
LaVail, M. M. (1976). Survival of some photoreceptors in albino rats following long-term exposure to continuous light. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 15, 6470.[Abstract]
Neitz, J. and Jacobs, G. H. (1986). Reexamination of spectral mechanisms in the rat (Rattus norvegicus). J. Comp. Psychol. 100, 2129.[Medline]
Palacios, A. G., Goldsmith, T. H. and Bernard, G. D. (1996). Sensitivity of cones from a cyprinid fish (Danio aequipinnatus) to ultraviolet and visible light. Vis. Neurosci. 13, 411421.[Medline]
Provencio, I. and Foster, R. G. (1995). Circadian rhythms in mice can be regulated by photoreceptors with cone-like characteristics. Brain Res. 694, 183190.[Medline]
Pugh, J., E. N., Lyubarsky, A. L., Faisini, B., Valentini, P. and Pennisi, M. (1998). UV- and M-cone pathways in the mouse retina are linked. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 39, S974.
Radlwimmer, F. B. and Yokoyama, S. (1998). Genetic analyses of the green visual pigments of rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and rat (Rattus norvegicus). Gene 218, 103109.[Medline]
Rowe, M. P. (1999). UV-visible reflectance patterns of raptor feathers and the potential arms race between stealthy raptors and their sub-aerial prey. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 40, S750.
Szel, A., Lukats, A., Fekete, T., Szepessy, Z. and Rohlich, P. (2000). Photoreceptor distribution in the retinas of subprimate mammals. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17, 568579.
Szel, A. and Rohlich, P. (1992). Two cone types of rat retina detected by anti-visual pigment antibodies. Exp. Eye Res. 55, 4752.[Medline]
Szel, A., Rohlich, P., Caffe, A. R., Juliusson, B., Aguire, G. and Van Veen, T. (1992). Unique separation of two spectral classes of cones in the mouse retina. J. Comp. Neurol. 325, 327342.[Medline]
Szel, A., Rohlich, P., Caffe, A. R. and van Veen, T. (1996). Distribution of cone photoreceptors in the mammalian retina. Microsc. Res. Techn. 35, 445462.[Medline]
von Schantz, M., Argamaso-Hernan, S. M., Szel, A. and Foster, R. G. (1997). Photopigments and photoentrainment in the Syrian golden hamster. Brain Res. 770, 131138.[Medline]
Walls, G. L. (1934). The visual cells of the white rat. J. Comp. Psychol.18, 363366.
Yokoyama, S. (1994). Gene duplications and evolution of short wavelength-sensitive visual pigments in vertebrates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11, 3239.[Abstract]
Yokoyama, S., Radlwimmer, F. B. and Kawamura, S. (1998). Regeneration of ultraviolet pigments of vertebrates. FEBS Lett. 423, 155158.[Medline]