Laboratory of Cell Regulation, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, 1-14, Bunkyo-machi, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: kohnom{at}net.nagasaki-u.ac.jp)
Accepted 27 September 2005
![]() |
Summary |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Sprouty, ERK pathway, Receptor tyrosine kinase, Negative feedback inhibition, FGF
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Sprouty was originally identified in Drosophila (dSprouty) as a feedback inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling during tracheal branching (Hacohen et al., 1998). Subsequent studies have shown that dSprouty also antagonizes epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor and other RTK signaling pathways during Drosophila organogenesis (Casci et al., 1999
; Kramer et al., 1999
; Reich et al., 1999
). However, its mode of action remains rather controversial; i.e. dSprouty has been shown to inhibit the activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) upstream of Ras during fly eye development (Casci et al., 1999
), whereas it appears to inhibit ERK activation downstream of Ras during wing development (Reich et al., 1999
).
Unlike Drosophila, mammalian cells express at least four Sprouty isoforms (Sprouty1-4) (Minowada et al., 1999; Impagnatiello et al., 2001
), whose expression is dependent on the ERK signaling pathway (Ozaki et al., 2001
; Sasaki et al., 2001
). These proteins have highly conserved C-terminal domains and highly variable N-terminal domains. As in Drosophila, mammalian Sprouty proteins function as feedback inhibitors of FGF signaling during organogenesis (Minowada et al., 1999
; Tefft et al., 1999
). However, the molecular mechanism by which each Sprouty isoform elicits its function as well as the physiological significance of the expression of four Sprouty proteins in mammalian cells have not been well established.
Over-expression of Sprouty1, Sprouty2 or Sprouty4 inhibits FGF- and vascular endothelial growth factor-induced proliferation, migration and differentiation by repressing pathways leading to ERK activation (Impagnatiello et al., 2001; Lee et al., 2001
; Sasaki et al., 2001
; Yigzaw et al., 2001
; Hanafusa et al., 2002
; Sasaki et al., 2003
). By contrast, Sprouty1/2 are unable to repress EGF-induced ERK activation, but potentiate it by attenuating Cbl-mediated endocytosis of the EGF receptor (Egan et al., 2002
; Wong et al., 2002
). Sprouty1/2 can inhibit FGF-induced ERK activation by preventing the recruitment of the Grb2-Sos complex to the FGF docking adaptor protein FRS2 or SH2-containing protein-tyrosine phosphatase Shp2 (Hanafusa et al., 2002
), or by acting downstream of the Grb2-Sos complex (Gross et al., 2001
). It should also be mentioned that members of the mammalian Sprouty family exhibit slightly different activities and interact with different partners, which include c-Cbl, Grb2, Raf1, FRS2, caveolin-1, dual specificity kinase TESK1 and protein tyrosine phosphatase PTP1B (Christofori, 2003
). It seems probable that mammalian Sprouty proteins exert their specific functions through multiple mechanisms, which probably depend on the type of growth factor stimulation, the cell type, and/or the experimental conditions.
In the present study, we have examined the molecular mechanisms by which Sprouty proteins elicit their inhibitory effects on the RTK signaling pathway, with special focus on the cooperation among Sprouty isoforms. For the analysis, we have utilized 293T cells expressing limited amounts of exogenous Sprouty isoforms as well as Swiss 3T3 cells stimulated with FGF-2. Our results demonstrate that the four mammalian Sprouty isoforms form hetero- as well as homooligomers through their C-terminal domains. Although Sprouty1 or Sprouty4 alone significantly inhibited the FGF-2-induced ERK activation by sequestering Grb2 or Sos1, respectively, the hetero-oligomer formed between these two Sprouty isoforms markedly suppressed the ERK activation by inhibiting the association of the Grb2-Sos1 complex with FRS2 more effectively.
![]() |
Materials and Methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Plasmids
Full-length cDNAs of mouse Sprouty1 (GenBank Accession Number: AF176903), human Sprouty2 (GenBank: BC004205), human Sprouty3 (NCB: NM_005840), mouse Sprouty4 (GenBank: AF176906), human Grb2 (GenBank: AF498925) and truncated forms of mouse Sprouty1 (nt 1-522 or nt 525-942) were amplified by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction using poly (A)+ RNA isolated from human TIG3 fibroblasts or mouse brain. Amplified products were subcloned into pEF1/Myc (Invitrogen), pcDNA3.1 (Invitrogen) with a Flag-tag at the N-terminus, or into pcDNA3.1 with an HA-tag at the C-terminus. Sequences were verified by DNA sequencing. The HA-tagged ERK2 expression plasmid was kindly donated by Michael J. Weber (University of Virginia Health Science Center).
Cell culture and transfection
Human embryonic kidney 293T cells and Swiss 3T3 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. For transfection experiments, 293T cells were plated at a density of 5 x 105 cells per 35 mm dish and incubated for 12 hours. Cells were transfected for 24 hours with appropriate expression plasmids in LipofectAMINE 2000 reagent (Invitrogen) as described in the manufacture's standard procedure. The total amount of plasmids transfected in each experiment was adjusted to 3 µg by the addition of empty plasmid (pcDNA3.1). In some experiments, cells were serum-starved for 6/24 hours in serum-free medium (DMEM containing 2 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 1 µg/ml insulin, 2 µg/ml transferrin, 30 nM Na2SeO3 and 10 mM Hepes, pH 7.4) (Iwasaki et al., 1999; Tanimura et al., 2002
) prior to stimulation with FGF-2 (20 ng/ml), EGF (20 ng/ml) or phorbol 12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) (10 ng/ml).
Cell lysis and immunoblotting
Cells were scraped off plates into a hypotonic cell lysis buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 25 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10 mM NaF, 25 mM ß-glycerophosphate, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 0.2 mM sodium molybdate, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 1% Triton X-100) and lysed by sonication for 60 seconds. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation for 30 minutes at 15,000 g, and protein concentrations were determined by using the BCA protein assay reagent (Pierce). Cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE, electrophoretically transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes and probed with respective primary antibody and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Promega). Proteins were visualized with the enhanced chemiluminescence system (Amersham Biosciences) (Hoshino et al., 2001).
Co-immunoprecipitation assay
Cells were lysed in IP lysis buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10 mM NaF, 25 mM ß-glycerophosphate, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 0.2 mM sodium molybdate, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 1% Nonidet P-40). Cell lysates (500 µg of protein) were incubated overnight at 4°C with 1 µg of respective precipitation antibody with gentle rocking. Immuno-complexes were collected on protein A/G plus-agarose (sc-2003, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), washed three times with IP wash buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10 mM NaF, 25 mM ß-glycerophosphate, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 0.2 mM sodium molybdate, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 0.5% Nonidet P-40), heated for 3 minutes at 95°C in SDS-PAGE sample buffer, resolved by SDS-PAGE and then analyzed by immunoblotting as described above.
Pull-down assay
293T cells transfected with the plasmid encoding Myc-tagged Sprouty1 or Sprouty2 were stimulated with 20 ng/ml EGF for 15 minutes and lysed in the IP lysis buffer. Cell lysates (500 µg) were incubated with Grb2-agarose or glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads overnight at 4°C with gentle rocking. Bound complexes were collected by centrifugation, washed three times with the IP wash buffer, boiled in SDS-sample buffer, resolved by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting as described above.
Small interfering RNA (siRNA) `knockdown' experiment
The following sequences targeting mouse Sprouty1 or Sprouty4 and their respective scrambled sequences as controls were designed to generate StealthTM siRNA duplex oligoribonucleotides (Invitrogen): for mouse Sprouty1, 5'-GCAGGAAAGGACTCATGAAATCATA-3' (sense), 5'-GCAGAAATCAGGTACTAAACGGATA-3' (scrambled); for mouse Sprouty4, 5'-GCCTGGGCTACTTGGTACCATTGTA-3' (sense), 5'-GCCTCGGTTCAATGGTACCTGTGTA-3' (scrambled). Swiss 3T3 cells were plated at a density of 6 x 104 cells per 35 mm dish and incubated for 12 hours, and then transfected with appropriate siRNAs (final concentration: 50 nM) for 24 hours using LipofectAMINE 2000 (Invitrogen).
Semi-quantitative reverse transcription (RT)-PCR
Swiss 3T3 cells transfected with appropriate siRNA were serum-starved for 24 hours and then stimulated with 20 ng/ml FGF-2 for 1 hour (for the analysis of Sprouty1 expression) or 2 hours (for the analysis of Sprouty4 expression) (Ozaki et al., 2001). Total RNA was isolated using ISOGENTM reagent (Nippon Gene, Tokyo). RT-PCR was performed with ThermoScriptTM RT-PCR system (Invitrogen) using 2
g of total RNA. Sets of primers, 5'-GGCCCCCCGGGCCCTGCC-3'/5'-TTGCCCTGAGCCCTTGAG-3' or 5'-CCCCGGTTCCACAGAGCA-3'/5'-CGGAGCTGTCGGGCCTTT-3', were used to amplify portions of mouse Sprouty1 or Sprouty4 cDNA, respectively, resulting in generation of a 372 or 443 bp fragment. Conditions for PCR cycles were: 94°C for 30 seconds, 58°C for 42 seconds, 72°C for 1 minute, and a final extension step at 72°C for 10 minutes. A portion of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) cDNA was co-amplified as an internal control with the following primer pair to generate a 250 bp fragment: 5'GTATGACTCCACTCACGGCA-3'/5'-CAAACATGGGGGCATCGGCA-3'. Amplified products were separated on 2.0% agarose gels.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Immunoprecipitation with anti-Myc/anti-Flag antibody and immunoblotting with anti-Flag/anti-Myc antibody showed that all Sprouty isoforms interacted with each other, most probably to form hetero- as well as homo-oligomers (Fig. 1A,B) (see Discussion). Furthermore, expression of Myc-tagged Sprouty1, 2, 3 or 4 in combination with either Flag-tagged Sprouty1 N-terminal fragment (residues 1-174; F1n) or Flag-tagged Sprouty1 C-terminal fragment (residues 175-313; F1c) followed by co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that C-terminal cysteine-rich domains were responsible for oligomer formation of the Sprouty isoforms (Fig. 1C,D, and data not shown).
|
293T cells were transfected with Flag-tagged Sprouty1, Sprouty2, Sprouty3 or Sprouty4, stimulated with EGF or FGF, immunoprecipitated with anti-Grb2 antibody, and then probed with anti-Flag antibody. As shown in Fig. 2A, a specific association of Grb2 with Sprouty1 but not with Sprouty2, Sprouty3 or Sprouty4 was observed. Although a small amount of Sprouty1 was detected in the immunoprecipitates obtained from unstimulated control cells, it was markedly increased by stimulation of the cells with EGF or FGF-2. Furthermore, a pull-down assay using Grb2-agarose beads, performed on the lysates of EGF-stimulated cells transfected with Myc-tagged Sprouty1 or Sprouty2, confirmed that Grb2 specifically interacted with Sprouty1 but not with Sprouty2 (Fig. 2B).
|
When the experiments were performed on 293T cells transfected with Myc-tagged Sprouty1 and either Flag-tagged Sprouty2, Sprouty3 or Sprouty4 in combination, anti-Grb2 antibody immunoprecipitates contained not only Sprouty1 but also the other respective Sprouty isoform. Similarly, anti-Sos1 antibody immunoprecipitates contained not only Sprouty4 but also the other respective Sprouty isoform when the experiments were performed on 293T cells transfected with Myc-tagged Sprouty4 and either Flag-tagged Sprouty1, Sprouty2 or Sprouty3 in combination (Fig. 2C). Such observed interaction between Grb2 and Sprouty2/3/4, or that between Sos-1 and Sprouty1/2/3, however, was considered not to be direct but through Sprouty1 or Sprouty4, respectively; all Sprouty isoforms form hetero-oligomers with other Sprouty isoforms through their C-terminal domains in the cells (Fig. 1).
Co-expression of Sprouty1 and Sprouty4 efficiently suppresses the ERK activation induced by FGF-2, but not by EGF or PMA
We examined the inhibitory effect of three major Sprouty isoforms on the mitogen-induced ERK activation. Sprouty3 is rather a minor isoform whose expression level has been found to be only limited in a variety of mammalian cells (see supplementary Fig. S2) and thus we have not examined further the functional significance of Sprouty3. The transfection efficiency of any gene into 293T cells was at most 50% under our experimental conditions, which made it difficult to accurately determine the effect of exogenously expressed Sprouty proteins on the activation of endogenous ERK1/2. Thus, 293T cells were transfected with either Flag-tagged Sprouty 1, 2 or 4 together with HA-tagged ERK2, and stimulated for 15 minutes with EGF, FGF-2 or PMA. Immunoblot analysis on the anti-HA antibody-immunoprecipitates with the use of anti-phospho ERK1/2 revealed that all of these Sprouty isofoms efficiently suppressed the ERK activation induced by FGF-2. On the contrary, none of them significantly inhibited the ERK activation induced by EGF or PMA (Fig. 3A). Inability of Sprouty2/4 to interfere with the EGF-induced activation of the ERK pathway has also been reported by other investigators (Impagnatiello et al., 2001
; Sasaki et al., 2001
).
|
Co-expression of Sprouty1 and Sprouty4 efficiently inhibits the FGF-2-induced association of Grb2 to FRS2
We examined the molecular mechanism by which co-expression of Sprouty1 and Sprouty4 efficiently suppresses the FGF-2-induced ERK activation. Unlike EGF receptor, FGF receptor lacks binding sites for the SH2 domain of Grb2. Consequently, FGF-2-induced ERK activation is mediated by the recruitment of Grb2/Sos to the plasma membrane through FRS2. FRS2 is a lipid-anchored docking protein and is phosphorylated at multiple tyrosine residues in response to FGF receptor activation, providing the binding site for the SH2 domain of Grb2 (Kouhara et al., 1997; Hadari et al., 1998
). Furthermore, involvement of other adaptor proteins, Shc isoforms, in the recruitment of Grb2/Sos to the plasma membrane has been reported in some cell systems (Wennstom and Downward, 1999). Therefore, we next analyzed the FGF-2/EGF-induced interaction between Grb2 and FRS2/Shc isoforms and further the possible interference of Sprouty isoforms with this interaction.
As discussed above, the transfection efficiency of any gene into 293T cells was at most 50%. To avoid the effect of interaction between Grb2 and FRS2/Shc isoforms that would occur in cells not expressing exogenous Sprouty proteins, we utilized a plasmid encoding HA-tagged Grb2 as a transfection/expression marker. Thus, 293T cells were transfected with Flag-tagged Sprouty1, Sprouty4, or Sprouty1 and Sprouty4 in combination, together with HA-tagged Grb2, and then stimulated with FGF-2 or EGF for 15 minutes. The results of a co-immunoprecipitation assay using anti-HA antibody revealed that FGF-2 stimulation clearly induced the association of Grb2 to FRS2 in the cells (Fig. 4). Although expression of Sprouty1 or Sprouty4 suppressed the FGF-2-induced interaction between Grb2 and FRS2, co-expression of these two Sprouty isoforms apparently inhibited the association of Grb2 to FRS2 even more markedly. These results are consistent with the observations that co-expression of Sprouty1 and Sprouty 4 induced a more efficient suppression of FGF-2-induced ERK activation than that observed with the expression of Sprouty1 or Sprouty4 alone (Fig. 3B)
|
Association of Shc isoforms (p46 and p52 and p66) with Grb2 was observed in unstimulated cells, which was not affected by stimulation of the cells with FGF-2. Although EGF-stimulation of the cells enhanced the interaction between Shc isoforms and Grb2, this interaction was not affected at all by the expression of Sprouty1, Sprouty4, or Sprouty1 and Sprouty4 in combination. Inability of Sprouty1/4 to interfere with the EGF-induced association between Shc isoforms and Grb2 is in agreement with the fact that these Sprouty isoforms did not inhibit the ERK activation induced by EGF (Fig. 3).
FGF-2-stimulation induces the expression and hetero-oligomerization of Sprouty isoforms in Swiss 3T3 cells
We next examined whether or not endogenous Sprouty isoforms actually form hetero-oligomers after their expression is induced by mitogen-stimulation of cells. FGF-2-stimulation of Swiss 3T3 cells induced the expression of Sprouty1, 2 and 4 proteins in an ERK-dependent manner (Fig. 5A). The time course profiles for the induction of Sprouty protein differed significantly among the isoforms; expression of Sprouty2 was observed as early as 1 hour after stimulation of the cells with FGF-2, which was followed by the expression of Sprouty1 and then by Sprouty4. Such a delayed expression of Sprouty4 as compared with the expression of other Sprouty isoforms in response to mitogen-stimulation of cells is consistent with our previous findings on Sprouty gene expression analyzed by northern blotting (Ozaki et al., 2001). FGF-2-stimulation induced a rather sustained activation of ERK1/2 in Swiss 3T3 cells, the down-regulation of which became apparent after 3 hours stimulation of the cells. In addition, FGF-2-stimulation induced a significant retardation of motility of Sos1 on SDS-PAGE, reflecting its phosphorylation (Langlois et al., 1995
), in an ERK-dependent manner.
|
siRNA knockdown of either Sprouty1 or Sprouty4 induces a prolonged activation of ERK1/2 in FGF-2-stimulated Swiss 3T3 cells
We finally examined the effect of siRNA knockdown of endogenous Sprouty1 and/or Sprouty4 on the FGF-2-induced activation of ERK1/2 in Swiss 3T3 cells. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR analyses revealed that transfection of Swiss 3T3 cells with Sprouty1 siRNA or Sprouty4 siRNA efficiently and specifically suppressed the FGF-2-induced expression of Sprouty1 or Sprouty4, respectively (Fig. 6A). Western blot analysis showed that the FGF-2-induced expression of Sprouty4 was markedly reduced in the Sprouty4 siRNA-tansfected cells (see supplementary Fig. S3).
|
Knockdown of Sprouty1 or Sprouty4 in Swiss 3T3 cells induced a more prolonged activation of ERK1/2 in response to FGF-2-stimulation, as compared with that observed in the scrambled RNA-transfected control cells (Fig. 6B). Sustained ERK1/2 activation observed in Sprouty1 siRNA-transfected cells was most prominent 2-4 hours after FGF-2-stimulation of the cells, while that observed in Sprouty4 siRNA-transfected cells was apparent 4 hours after the stimulation, which is consistent with the differential time course profile of their expression (Fig. 5A). Furthermore, FGF-2-stimulation induced a markedly prolonged ERK1/2 activation when Swiss 3T3 cells were co-transfected with Sprouty1 siRNA and Sprouty4 siRNA to knockdown both of these Sprouty isoforms. These results indicate that Sprouty1 and Sprouty4 actually function as negative regulators of the ERK pathway, and that their co-operative interaction would lead to a more efficient suppression of the mitogen-induced ERK activation.
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The four Sprouty isoforms have highly variable N-terminal domains, through which each Sprouty protein can interact with a specific signaling molecule. Accordingly, we have shown in this report that Sprouty1 interacts specifically with Grb2 and Sprouty4 with Sos1. These results were obtained by analyzing 293T cells in which gene(s) encoding the respective Sprouty protein(s), but not other signaling molecules, were expressed (Fig. 2). Furthermore, we employed suboptimal conditions for the transfection of Sprouty expression plasmids into the cells, which made the expression level of Sprouty proteins not too high but rather similar to those observed under physiological conditions (supplementary Fig. S1). In this respect, specific interaction of Drosophila Sprouty with Grb2 and RasGAP (Casci et al., 1999), Xenopus Sprouty1 and mammalian Sprouty2 with Grb2 and Shp2 (Hanafusa et al., 2002
; Hanafusa et al., 2004
), Sprouty2 with Raf-1, Grb2, FRS2 and Shp2 (Tefft et al., 2002
), Sprouty2 with c-Cbl (Wong et al., 2001
; Hall et al., 2003
), Sprouty2 with PTP-1B (Yigzaw et al., 2003
), Sprouty4 with Raf-1 (Sasaki et al., 2003
), and Sprouty1 and Sprouty2 with Caveolin-1 but not with Grb2 (Impagnatiello et al., 2001
) have been reported. All of these results were obtained in mammalian cell lines in which the respective Sprouty gene together with genes encoding other signaling molecules, such as Grb2 and Raf1, and even genes encoding RTKs in some experiments (Hanafusa et al., 2002
; Wong et al., 2002
; Yusoff et al., 2002
; Hanafusa et al., 2004
), were over-expressed. Under such conditions, the relative concentrations of Sprouty proteins versus other signaling molecules in the cells would differ significantly from the endogenous ones and also vary depending on the experimental conditions. This might explain why similar, but not identical, results have been obtained by different investigators. However, taking all of these results into consideration, it seems very probable that four Sprouty proteins are functionally distinct from each other and that each Sprouty protein interacts with some specific signaling molecule through its N-terminal domain to interrupt the RTK pathway.
Grb2 is an adaptor protein and consists of two SH3 domains surrounding one SH2 domain. The SH2 domain of Grb2 recognizes phosphorylated tyrosine residues of several proteins such as EGF receptor, Shc and FRS2. In this respect, work by several groups has shown that Spouty proteins are phosphorylated on tyrosine residues upon RTK stimulation, thereby generating docking sites for the SH2 domain of Grb2 (Hanafusa et al., 2002). We have confirmed that EGF- or FGF-stimulation of 293T cells transfected with Sprouty1/4 induces tyrosine phosphorylation of Sprouty proteins (data not shown). Furthermore, EGF- or FGF-stimulation of the cells clearly enhanced the binding of Sprouty1 to Grb2 (Fig. 2A). All these results support the notion that interaction between Sprouty1 and Grb2 is, at least in part, through the binding of phosphorylated tyrosine residue of Sprouty1 to the SH2 domain of Grb2.
Specific interaction of Sprouty4 with Sos has been observed, and this is not affected by stimulation of the cells with EGF/FGF-2 (Fig. 2A). Under physiological conditions, however, expression of four Sprouty isoforms is induced only after activation of the ERK pathway, which ensures the negative feedback role of Sprouty proteins against the ERK pathway (Ozaki et al., 2001; Sasaki et al., 2001
). The mechanism by which Sprouty4 interacts specifically with Sos1 remains to be determined.
Expression of Sprouty1, 2 or 4 efficiently inhibited the ERK activation induced by FGF-2 (Fig. 3A). As discussed above, Sprouty1 associates specifically with Grb2 and Sprouty4 with Sos1, thereby disturbing the interaction between Grb2 and Sos1 and furthermore their interaction with other signaling molecules, such as FRS2 (Fig. 4). All of these protein-protein interactions are prerequisites to induce the activation of Ras (Li et al., 1993; Rozakis-Adcock et al., 1993
). Sprouty2 would also interact with certain signaling molecule(s); however, we have not yet identified them in our experimental system. In this respect, we have previously shown that Sprouty2 interrupts the RTK pathway upstream of Ras (Ozaki et al., 2001
). Thus, by interacting with and sequestering several signaling molecules, Sprouty proteins intercept the FGF receptor-signaling pathway upstream of Ras, leading to the suppression of ERK activation. Results of the siRNA knockdown studies (Fig. 6B) have confirmed the negative feedback role of Sprouty1 and Sprouty4 against the FGF2-induced activation of the ERK pathway.
By binding to Grb2, Sos1 is recruited to the plasma membrane and activates Ras by GTP loading. Interaction of these two molecules appears to be constitutive and the majority of them appear to form Grb2-Sos1 complexes in the cells (Fig. 4). However, a population of each of these molecules can be free from the other: the affinity of these molecules may be high but cannot be infinite. In this situation, Sprouty1 homodimers, for example, bind to and sequester Grb2-Sos1 complex as well as free Grb2, and Sprouty4 homodimers bind to and sequester Grb2-Sos1 complex as well as free Sos1, thereby suppressing the reciprocal association of Grb2 and Sos1 and further the association of Grb2-Sos1 complex with other signaling molecules considerably, such as FRS2. On the contrary, Sprouty1-Sprouty4 heterodimers bind to and sequester free Grb2, free Sos1 and Grb2-Sos1 complex, which would result in a more efficient blockade of the interaction between Grb2-Sos1 complex and FRS2 (see supplementary Fig. S4). Consistent with this idea, we have shown that co-expression in the cells of Sprouty1 and Sprouty4 inhibits the association of Grb2-Sos1 complex with FRS2 more markedly than that observed with the expression of each Sprouty isoform alone, and furthermore suppresses the FGF-2-induced ERK activation almost completely (Figs 3, 4).
Co-expression of Sprouty1 and Sprouty2 also suppressed the FGF-2-induced ERK activation more efficiently than that observed with the expression of each Sprouty isoform alone (Fig. 3). The molecular mechanism of this suppression remains to be elucidated. The enhanced suppression of ERK activation observed by co-expression of Sprouty isoforms could have biological significance. The majority of our experiments were performed by utilizing 293T cells in which limited amount of Sprouty expression plasmid had been transfected in an effort to make their expression levels not too high but rather similar to those observed in FGF-2-stimulated Swiss 3T3 cells (supplementary Fig. S1). Under physiological conditions, however, expression of Sprouty proteins is rather transient (Fig. 5A). Under such conditions, limited amounts of Sprouty isoforms would be able to efficiently suppress the growth factor-induced activation of the ERK pathway by forming appropriate hetero-oligomers. Strongly supporting this idea, we provide evidence that Sprouty1/2 and Sprouty4 form hetero-oligomer in FGF-2-stimulated Swiss 3T3 cells (Fig. 5B). The Sprouty1-Sprouty4 hetero-oligomer thus formed is suggested to sequester Grb2/Sos1 effectively, which would result in the efficient suppression of the ERK signaling pathway under physiological conditions.
Excessive or inappropriate activation of the ERK pathway has been associated with carcinogenesis of human neoplasms (Oka et al., 1995; Hoshino et al., 1999
; Hoshino et al., 2001
; Kohno and Pouyssegur, 2003
). Thus, negative feedback inhibition of the ERK pathway, after growth factor-stimulation, is essential for maintaining balanced cell growth in multi-cellular organisms. In this respect, mammalian cells would probably have developed several systems for the very strict spatial and temporal regulation of the ERK activity. For example, activation of the ERK pathway induces the expression of MAP kinase phosphatases, which directly dephosphorylate and inactivate ERKs (Camps et al., 1999
; Farooq and Zhou, 2004
). Alternatively, ERK activation induces the expression of four Sprouty isoforms. Although each Sprouty isoform binds to and sequesters its respective signaling molecule to interfere with the growth factor-induced activation of the ERK pathway, their cooperation, i.e. formation of hetero-oligomers among them, apparently suppresses the ERK activation more efficiently (Fig. 3). The markedly prolonged ERK1/2 activation observed in FGF-2-stimulated Swiss 3T3 cells in which Sprouty1 siRNA and Sprouty4 siRNA were transfected to knockdown both of them (Fig. 6B) would support the importance of cooperative interaction among Sprouty isoforms in the negative feedback inhibition of the ERK pathway. This could explain, at least in part, why mammalian cells express four Sprouty isoforms.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that four mammalian Sprouty isoforms form hetero- as well as homo-oligomers through their C-terminal domains. Many of these hetero-oligomers, especially that formed between Sprouty1 and Sprouty4, suppress the FGF-2-induced ERK activation more efficiently than the corresponding homo-oligomers. This could represent a more advanced system for strict regulation of the activation state of the ERK signaling pathway in mammalian cells.
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
![]() |
Footnotes |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Blume-Jensen, P. and Hunter, T. (2001). Oncogenic kinase signaling. Nature 411, 355-365.[CrossRef][Medline]
Camps, M., Nichols, A. and Arkinstall, S. (1999). Dual specificity phosphatases: a gene family for control of MAP kinase function. FASEB J. 14, 6-16.
Casci, T., Vinos, J. and Freeman, M. (1999). Sprouty, an intracellular inhibitor of Ras signaling. Cell 96, 655-665.[CrossRef][Medline]
Christofori, G. (2003). Split personalities: the agonistic antagonist Sprouty. Nat. Cell Biol. 5, 377-379.[CrossRef][Medline]
Egan, J. E., Hall, A. B., Yatsula, B. A. and Bar-Sagi, D. (2002). The bimodal regulation of epidermal growth factor signaling by human Sprouty proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 6041-6046.
Farooq, A. and Zhou, M. M. (2004). Structure and regulation of MAPK phosphatases. Cell Signal. 16, 769-779.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gross, I., Bassit, B., Benezra, M. and Licht, J. D. (2001). Mammalian sprouty proteins inhibit cell growth and differentiation by preventing ras activation. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 46460-46468.
Gum, J. R. J. (1992). Mucin genes and the proteins they encode: structure, diversity, and regulation. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 7, 557-564.[Medline]
Hacohen, N., Kramer, S., Sutherland, D., Hiromi, Y. and Krasnow, M. A. (1998). sprouty encodes a novel antagonist of FGF signaling that patterns apical branching of the Drosophila airways. Cell 92, 253-263.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hadari, Y. R., Kouhara, H., Lax, I. and Schlessinger, J. (1998). Binding of Shp2 tyrosine phosphatase to FRS2 is essential for fibroblast growth factor-induced PC12 cell differentiation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 3966-3973.
Hall, A. B., Jura, N., DaSilva, J., Jang, Y. J., Gong, D. and Bar-Sagi, D. (2003). hSpry2 is targeted to the ubiquitin-dependent proteasome pathway by c-Cbl. Curr. Biol. 13, 308-314.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hanafusa, H., Torii, S., Yasunaga, T. and Nishida, E. (2002). Sprouty1 and Sprouty2 provide a control mechanism for the Ras/MAPK signaling pathway. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 850-858.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hanafusa, H., Torii, S., Yasunaga, T., Matsumoto, K. and Nishida, E. (2004). Shp2, an SH2-containing protein-tyrosine phosphatase, positively regulates receptor tyrosine kinase signaling by dephosphorylating and inactivating the inhibitor Sprouty. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 22992-22995.
Hanahan, D. and Weinberg, R. A. (2000). The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100, 57-70.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hoshino, R., Chatani, Y., Yamori, T., Tsuruo, T., Oka, H., Yoshida, O., Shimada, Y., Ari-I, S., Wada, H., Fujimoto, J. et al. (1999). Constitutive activation of the 41-/43-kDa mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway in human tumors. Oncogene 18, 813-822.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hoshino, R., Tanimura, S., Watanabe, K., Kataoka, T. and Kohno, M. (2001). Blockade of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway induces marked G1 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in tumor cells in which the pathway is constitutively activated: up-regulation of p27Kip1. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 2686-2692.
Hunter, T. (2000). Signaling-2000 and beyond. Cell 100, 113-127.[CrossRef][Medline]
Impagnatiello, M. A., Weitzer, S., Gannon, G., Compagni, A., Cotton, M. and Christofori, G. (2001). Mammalian sprouty-1 and -2 are membrane-anchored phosphoprotein inhibitors of growth factor signaling in endothelial cells. J. Cell Biol. 152, 1087-1098.
Iwasaki, S., Iguchi, M., Watanabe, K., Hoshino, R., Tsujimoto, M. and Kohno, M. (1999). Specific activation of the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway and induction of neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells by bone morphogenetic protein-2. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 26503-26510.
Kohno, M. and Pouyssegur, J. (2003). Pharmacological inhibitors of the ERK signaling pathway: application as anticancer drugs. Prog. Cell Cycle Res. 5, 219-224.[Medline]
Kouhara, H., Hadari, Y. R., Spivak-Kroizman, T., Schilling, J., Bar-Sagi, D., Lax, I. and Schlessinger, J. (1997). A lipid-anchored Grb2-binding protein that links FGF-receptor activation to the Ras/MAPK signaling pathway. Cell 89, 693-702.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kramer, S., Okabe, M., Hacohen, N., Krasnow, M. A. and Hiromi, Y. (1999). Sprouty: a common antagonist of FGF and EGF signaling pathways in Drosophila. Development 126, 2515-2525.
Langlois, W. J., Sasaoka, T., Saltiel, A. R. and Olefsky, J. M. (1995). Negative feedback regulation and desensitization of insulin- and epidermal growth factor-stimulated p21ras activation. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 25320-25323.
Lee, S. H., Schloss, D. J., Jarvis, L., Krasnow, M. A. and Swain, J. L. (2001). Inhibition of angiogenesis by a mouse sprouty protein. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 4128-4133.
Li, N., Batzer, A., Daly, R., Yajnik, V., Skolnik, E., Chardin, P., Bar-Sagi, D., Margolis, B. and Schlessinger, J. (1993). Guanine-nucleotide-releasing factor hSos1 binds to Grb2 and links receptor tyrosine kinases to Ras signalling. Nature 363, 85-88.[CrossRef][Medline]
Minowada, G., Jarvis, L. A., Chi, C. L., Neubuser, A., Sun, X., Hacohen, N., Krasnow, M. A. and Martin, G. R. (1999). Vertebrate Sprouty genes are induced by FGF signaling and can cause chondrodysplasia when overexpressed. Development 126, 4465-4475.
Oka, H., Chatani, Y., Hoshino, R., Ogawa, O., Kakehi, Y., Terachi, T., Okada, Y., Kawaichi, M., Kohno, M. and Yoshida, O. (1995). Constitutive activation of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases in human renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 55, 4182-4187.[Abstract]
Ozaki, K., Kadomoto, R., Asato, K., Tanimura, S., Itoh, N. and Kohno, M. (2001). ERK pathway positively regulates the expression of Sprouty genes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 285, 1084-1088.[CrossRef][Medline]
Reich, A., Sapir, A. and Shilo, B. (1999). Sprouty is a general inhibitor of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling. Development 126, 4139-4147.
Rozakis-Adcock, M., Fernley, R., Wade, J., Pawson, T. and Bowtell, D. (1993). The SH2 and SH3 domains of mammalian Grb2 couple the EGF receptor to the Ras activator mSos1. Nature 363, 83-85.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sasaki, A., Taketomi, T., Wakioka, T., Kato, R. and Yoshimura, A. (2001). Identification of a dominant negative mutant of Sprouty that potentiates fibroblast growth factor-but not epidermal growth factor-induced ERK activation. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 36804-36808.
Sasaki, A., Taketomi, T., Kato, R., Saeki, K., Nonami, A., Sasaki, M., Kuriyama, M., Saito, N., Shibuya, M. and Yoshimura, A. (2003). Mammalian Sprouty4 suppresses Ras-independent ERK activation by binding to Raf1. Nat. Cell Biol. 5, 427-432.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schlessinger, J. (2000). Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinase. Cell 103, 211-225.[CrossRef][Medline]
Simon, M. A. (2000). Receptor tyrosine kinases: specific outcomes from general signals. Cell 103, 13-15.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tanimura, S., Nomura, K., Ozaki, K., Tsujimoto, M., Kondo, T. and Kohno, M. (2002). Prolonged nuclear retention of activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 is required for hepatocyte growth factor-induced cell motility. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 28256-28264.
Tanimura, S., Asato, K., Fujishiro, S. and Kohno, M. (2003). Specific blockade of the ERK pathway inhibits the invasiveness of tumor cells: down-regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-3/-9/-14 and CD44. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 304, 801-806.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tefft, J. D., Lee, M., Smith, S., Leinwand, M., Zhao, J., Bringas, P. J., Crowe, D. L. and Warburton, D. (1999). Conserved function of mSpry-2, a murine homolog of Drosophila sprouty, which negatively modulates respiratory organogenesis. Curr. Biol. 9, 219-222.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tefft, J. D., Lee, M., Smith, S., Crowe, D. L., Bellusci, S. and Warburton, D. (2002). mSprouty2 inhibits FGF10-activated MAP kinase by differentially binding to upstream target proteins. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 283, L700-L706.
Voas, M. G. and Rebay, I. (2004). Signal integration during development: insights from the Drosophila eye. Dev. Dyn. 229, 162-175.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wallis, R. and Drickamer, K. (1999). Molecular determinants of oligomer formation and complement fixation in mannose-binding proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 3580-3589.
Wennstrom, S. and Downward, J. (1999). Role of phosphoinositide 3-kinase in activation of ras and mitogen-activated protein kinase by epidermal growth factor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 4279-4288.
Wong, E. S., Lim, J., Low, B. C., Chen, Q. and Guy, G. R. (2001). Evidence for direct interaction between Sprouty and Cbl. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 5866-5875.
Wong, E. S., Fong, C. W., Lim, J., Yusoff, P., Low, B. C., Langdon, W. Y. and Guy, G. R. (2002). Sprouty2 attenuates epidermal growth factor receptor ubiquitylation and endocytosis, and consequently enhances Ras/ERK signalling. EMBO J. 21, 4796-4808.
Yigzaw, Y., Cartin, L., Pierre, S., Scholich, K. and Patel, T. B. (2001). The C terminus of sprouty is important for modulation of cellular migration and proliferation. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 22742-22747.
Yigzaw, Y., Poppleton, H. M., Sreejayan, N., Hassid, A. and Patel, T. B. (2003). Protein-tyrosine phosphatases-1B (PTP1B) mediates the anti-migratory actions of Sprouty. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 284-288.
Yusoff, P., Lao, D. H., Ong, S. H., Wong, E. S., Lim, J., Lo, T. L., Leong, H. F., Fong, C. W. and Guy, G.R. (2002). Sprouty2 inhibits the Ras/MAP kinase pathway by inhibiting the activation of Raf. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 3195-3201.
Zwick, E., Bange, J. and Ullrich, A. (2002). Receptor tyrosine kinases as targets for anticancer drugs. Trends Mol. Med. 8, 17-23.[CrossRef][Medline]