Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zürich, Institute of Biochemistry, HPM F11.1, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: ulrike.kutay{at}bc.biol.ethz.ch)
Accepted 7 March 2003
![]() |
Summary |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Nucleo-cytoplasmic transport, Ribosome, Export, CRM1, NMD3, LMB
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Nuclear export of ribosomal subunits is a receptor-mediated process
(Bataillé et al., 1990).
Over the past few years, it has been intensively studied in Saccharomyces
cerevisiae (for a review, see Johnson
et al., 2002
). In yeast, nuclear export of both ribosomal subunits
has been shown to require the nuclear export receptor Crm1p and a functional
RanGTPase system (Hurt et al.,
1999
; Moy and Silver,
1999
; Ho et al.,
2000b
; Stage-Zimmermann et
al., 2000
; Gadal et al.,
2001
; Moy and Silver,
2002
). The exportin Crm1p/exportin 1 belongs to a conserved
superfamily of RanGTP-binding nuclear transport receptors
(Fornerod et al., 1997
;
Görlich et al., 1997
),
which facilitate the nuclear pore passage of proteins, RNAs and
ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) in all eukaryotes. The binding of RanGTP to these
transport receptors controls the compartment-specific association with their
transport substrates (Mattaj and
Englmeier, 1998
; Görlich
and Kutay, 1999
). Export complexes between exportins (such as
CRM1) and their respective export cargos form in the presence of RanGTP in the
nucleus, where RanGTP is highly concentrated. After translocation through the
NPC these export complexes are disassembled in the cytoplasm, where GTP
hydrolysis on Ran is activated by the RanGTPase activating protein (RanGAP)
aided by cytoplasmic Ran-binding proteins.
The exportin CRM1 recognizes leucine-rich nuclear export signals (NES) on
most of its export substrates (Fornerod et
al., 1997; Fukuda et al.,
1997
; Ossareh-Nazari et al.,
1997
; Stade et al.,
1997
). CRM1 not only mediates the nuclear export of a great
variety of different proteins, but is also involved in the export of different
classes of RNAs. In contrast to other exportins
(Arts et al., 1998
;
Kutay et al., 1998
;
Calado et al., 2002
), CRM1 does
not recognize these RNAs directly. Rather, these RNAs associate with specific
NES-containing adaptor proteins, which funnel these RNAs into the
CRM1-mediated export pathway (Fischer et
al., 1995
; Ohno et al.,
2000
).
Although Crm1p has been implicated in ribosomal subunit export in yeast, it
is not yet fully understood how it serves this process. So far, an interaction
of Crm1p with either of the two subunits has not been demonstrated. The
binding of Crm1p to pre-ribosomal subunits might require bridging by adaptor
proteins. Although no such candidate adaptor protein has been identified for
the pre-40S particles, yeast Nmd3p has been suggested to serve as an
NES-containing export adaptor for the 60S subunit
(Ho et al., 2000b;
Gadal et al., 2001
).
Strikingly, yeast strains harboring NMD3 ts alleles show defects in
60S subunit export, whereas 40S subunit export is unaffected. Furthermore,
Nmd3p is a shuttling protein that contains a nuclear localization signal (NLS)
and a leucine-rich NES in its C-terminal domain
(Ho et al., 2000b
;
Gadal et al., 2001
). At steady
state, Nmd3p localizes predominantly to the cytoplasm where it is bound to
free 60S subunits (Ho and Johnson,
1999
; Ho et al.,
2000a
). An NES deletion mutant of Nmd3p accumulates in the nucleus
and, if overexpressed, interferes with nuclear export of pre-60S particles.
Nmd3p interacts physically and genetically with ribosomal protein L10
(Gadal et al., 2001
).
Interestingly, RPL10 was found in a genetic screen for ribosomal export
mutants (rix mutants) (Gadal et al.,
2001
). It has been proposed that Rpl10p serves as a landing pad
for Nmd3p on nucleoplasmic pre-60S subunits. Proteomic analysis of distinct
nucleolar and nucleoplasmic pre-60S particles showed that Nmd3p joins these
subunits late during biogenesis and is associated with pre-60S particles
believed to represent export-competent species
(Nissan et al., 2002
). These
data are consistent with a model in which Nmd3p associates with
export-competent 60S subunits in the nucleus, recruits Crm1p into an export
complex, which then facilitates the translocation of the subunit through the
NPC (Ho et al., 2000b
;
Gadal et al., 2001
). However,
so far it has not been demonstrated that Nmd3p binds to Crm1p directly nor
have Crm1p and Ran been found on any of the analyzed 60S or pre-60S particles
(Bassler et al., 2001
;
Harnpicharnchai et al., 2001
;
Saveanu et al., 2001
;
Fatica et al., 2002
;
Nissan et al., 2002
).
Neither ribosomal export adaptors nor export receptors have been identified in higher eukaryotes. Thus, we have investigated the potential involvement of the exportin CRM1 in ribosomal subunit export in higher eukaryotes. Our results show that the export of both subunits is dependent on functional CRM1. Further, we cloned the mammalian homologue of Nmd3p (hNMD3) and demonstrate that it contains a conserved NES in its C-terminal region. Importantly, we also show that hNMD3 binds CRM1 in a RanGTP-dependent manner and that the conserved NES in hNMD3 is required for CRM1 binding. Although hNMD3 can associate both with 60S ribosomal subunits and with CRM1, it was unable to recruit CRM1 to purified, cytoplasmic 60S, suggesting that the association of hNMD3 with cytoplasmic and nucleoplasmic 60S subunits might differ mechanistically so as to recruit CRM1 to only the nuclear form of the subunit.
![]() |
Materials and Methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Molecular cloning, protein expression and purification
The complete coding regions of human rpS5, rpL29 and human NMD3 (CGI-07
protein, NP_057022), or the various deletion derivatives of hNMD3, were
amplified by PCR using HeLa cell cDNA as a template. To express GFP fusions of
hNMD3 or C-terminal hNMD3 deletion mutants in HeLa cells, the corresponding
PCR fragments were cloned into the HindIII/BamHI sites of
pEGFP-C1 (Clontech) generating pEGFP-hNMD3, pEGFP-hNMD3C27 and
pEGFP-hNMD3
C71. Site-directed mutagenesis on pEGFP-hNMD3 was performed
using the QuikChange® Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit from
Stratagene, generating pEGFP-hNMD3-NESmut containing changes L487A and I489A.
The rpS5 and rpL29 PCR fragments were inserted into the
EcoRI/BamHI sites of pEGFP-N3. For expression of hNMD3 in
E. coli, PCR fragments were cloned into the
NcoI/BamHI sites of pQE602z or into the
BamHI/XmaI sites of pQE30, yielding pQE602z-hNMD3,
pQE602z-hNMD3
C27 and pQE30-hNMD3.
2z-hNMD3 and 2z-hNMD3C27 were expressed in E. coli
BLR(pRep4) at 24°C. Cells were lysed by sonication in 50 mM Tris pH 7.5,
500 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 5% glycerol and 2 mM
ß-mercaptoethanol (ß-ME). The lysate was cleared by
ultracentrifugation, then passed over Ni-NTA agarose (Qiagen) and eluted with
400 mM imidazole in lysis buffer. Peak fractions were pooled and the buffer
exchanged to 50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2. Expression
and purification of CRM1 and RanQ69L was performed as previously described
(Englmeier et al., 2001
).
Transfection, immunolocalization and FISH
HeLa cells were transiently transfected using the FuGene transfection
reagent (Roche). For fixation, cells were washed twice with PBS and then
incubated in 3.7% paraformaldehyde for 10 minutes. To visualize GFP fusion
proteins, coverslips were washed in PBS and mounted. Indirect
immunolocalization was performed as previously described
(Calado and Carmo-Fonseca,
2000).
For in situ hybridization, cells were fixed/permeabilized with 3.7%
formaldehyde and 0.1% TX-100 in 1x PBS. Cells were washed twice in
2x SSC. In case RNase treatment was performed, cells were incubated with
100 µg/ml RNase A for 1 hour at 37°C and subsequently washed three
times with 2x SSC. Digoxigenin-labeled probes to rRNAs, generated by
nick translation from plasmids containing parts of the mature regions of 18S
and 28S rRNA, respectively (Rothblum et
al., 1982; Subrahmanyam et
al., 1982
), were a kind gift of C. Carvalho and M. Carmo-Fonseca
(University of Lisbon, Portugal) (Carvalho
et al., 2001
). Prior to hybridization, cells were washed with 50%
deionized formamide, 2x SSC. Hybridization was performed at 37°C for
4 hours, using either 10 ng of DIG-labeled 28S rRNA probe or 100 ng of
DIG-labeled 18S rRNA probe in hybridization buffer (50% deionized formamide,
2x SSC, 10% dextran sulfate, 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 and 1
µg/µl E. coli tRNA). Note that the probes were denatured prior
to use for 5 minutes at 70°C. After hybridization, samples were washed
three times with 53% deionized formamide, 2x SSC at 45°C, twice with
0.1x SSC at 60°C, twice with 4x SSC at 25°C and finally
with 4x SSC, 0.05% Tween. Detection of the DIG probes was done using a
mouse anti-DIG antibody followed by a fluorescently labeled anti-mouse
antibody. LMB was used at a concentration of 10 ng/ml medium.
In vitro binding to 2z-hNMD3
Purified recombinant 2z-hNMD3 or 2z-hNMD3C27 (40 pmol), CRM1 (50
pmol) and RanQ69L (125 pmol) were incubated together in a final volume of 100
µl in 50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM potassium acetate, 2 mM MgCl2,
0.4 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 30 minutes on ice. Then, 20 µl
IgG-Sepharose beads (Pharmacia) were added and the samples occasionally mixed.
After 20 minutes, beads were washed three times with 1.5 ml of binding buffer
and once with buffer 50 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.5, 0.001% TX-100. Bound proteins were
eluted from the resin with sample buffer containing 4% sodium dodecyl sulfate
(SDS).
Xenopus oocyte injections and rRNA analysis
For labeling of endogenous RNAs, Xenopus oocytes were injected
with 30 kBq of [-32P]-GTP. To compete with CRM1-mediated
protein export, 10 nl of BSA-peptide conjugates (200 ng of BSA-peptide
conjugate per oocyte) were injected into oocyte nuclei using dextran blue as a
marker for nuclear injection. The peptides had been coupled to BSA by virtue
of an N-terminal cysteine residue and comprised the wild-type NES of PKI
(CELALKLAGLDIN) or a mutant form (CELALKAAGADIN).
RNAs were extracted from nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions of 5 oocytes per time point. To ensure efficient recovery of RNA from the nuclear fractions, an uninjected oocyte was added to these samples. After proteinase K treatment, RNA was isolated by phenol extraction and ethanol precipitation. RNAs were dissolved in water, mixed with equal amounts of glyoxal gel sample buffer (Ambion) and denatured for 30 minutes at 50°C. RNAs were separated in a 1% agarose gel in 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.0. To control for equal recovery of RNA in each sample, the rRNAs were first visualized by ethidium bromide staining. Gels were then dried onto Zeta Probe membranes (BioRad) and analyzed by phosphoimaging.
Purification of 60S and 40S subunits from HeLa cells
Ribosomal subunits were prepared from pellets of a high-speed
centrifugation used for the preparation of HeLa cell extracts
(Kutay et al., 2000). The
pellets were resuspended in 50 mM Hepes pH 7.5, 300 mM KCl, 5 mM
MgCl2 and 6 mM ß-ME and spun through a 1.25 M sucrose cushion
prepared with the same buffer. The ribosomal pellet was resuspended in high
salt buffer (HSB) containing 50 mM Hepes pH 7.5, 600 mM KCl, 10 mM
MgCl2 and 5 mM ß-ME. The ribosomal subunits were then
separated on a linear 12.5-27.5% sucrose gradient in high salt buffer for 19
hours at 80,000 g in a Beckman SW41 rotor. The gradient was
fractionated, the peak fractions containing 40S or 60S subunits were pooled,
diluted with equal volume of HSB and sedimented overnight at 540,000
g in a Beckman TLA 100.4 rotor. The pellets were resuspended
in 50 mM Hepes pH 7.5, 100 mM potassium acetate, 5 mM MgCl2 and 250
mM sucrose. The integrity of ribosomal RNA was analyzed and the ratio of
absorption at 260 and 280 nm measured to control for the quality of the
preparation.
Sedimentation assay
Cytoplasmic 60S ribosomal subunits were incubated for 15 minutes with
purified recombinant factors in 140 µl of 50 mM Hepes pH 7.5, 100 mM
potassium acetate, 5 mM magnesium acetate and then pelleted by centrifugation
at 436,000 g for 15 minutes in a Beckman TLA 100 rotor.
Proteins in the supernatants and ribosomal pellets (resuspended in water) were
trichloroacetic acid (TCA) precipitated, washed with acetone and dissolved in
50 µl SDS sample buffer.
Sucrose density gradient
Ribosomal subunits were incubated with 6His-hNMD3 in 40 µl of 50 mM
Hepes pH 7.5, 100 mM potassium acetate, 5 mM magnesium acetate, 0.4
mg/ml BSA for 15 minutes on ice, diluted to 150 µl and then loaded on top
of a 10-40% sucrose gradient. Centrifugation was for 2 hours at 260,000
g in a Beckman TLS 55 rotor. The gradient was fractionated
into 16 samples, protein precipitated with 15% TCA and resuspended in SDS
sample buffer. Because of the BSA in the top fractions of the gradient, from
fractions 1 to 5 only half the amount of protein relative to fraction 6 to 16
was loaded on a 12% SDS gel.
RanGTPase assay
The RanGTPase assay was performed as described previously
(Bischoff et al., 1995;
Kutay et al., 1997
;
Kutay et al., 2000
).
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
As a reporter for the intracellular distribution of ribosomal subunits, we first expressed GFP fusions of ribosomal proteins. Most of these GFP-ribosomal protein chimeras were not suited for this analysis because they were probably not incorporated into newly made subunits. They gave rise to strong nucleolar signals but did not localize to the cytoplasm even after long periods of expression, indicating a failure in their assembly into ribosomal subunits in the nucleolus or a dominant negative effect on ribosomal biogenesis (data not shown). These proteins included GFP-rpS6, GFP-rpS20 and GFP-rpS23 of the small subunit and GFP-rpL7 and GFP-rpL30a of the large subunit. Two other reporter constructs, rpS5-GFP and rpL29-GFP, were mainly nuclear 16 hours after transfection, but displayed a cytoplasmic staining in addition to a nuclear/nucleolar localization over prolonged expression times of up to 38 hours (Fig. 1A). This time-dependent change in localization suggested that these two proteins were able to incorporate into ribosomal subunits and to leave the nucleolus as part of ribosomal subunits. To investigate the involvement of CRM1 in this relocalization process and potentially ribosomal subunit export, HeLa cells were transferred into LMB containing medium 16 hours after transfection. Five or 18 hours later, cells were fixed and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 1B). LMB treatment resulted in a significant loss of the cytoplasmic GFP signal when compared to control cells, suggesting that the CRM1 pathway might play a role in the export of both reporter proteins and hence in the export of 40S and the 60S ribosomal subunits.
|
We wished to verify this result by analyzing the effect of LMB on the intracellular distribution of two endogenous ribosomal proteins by indirect immunofluorescence using specific antibodies. RpL23a and rpS6 were chosen as markers for the large and small subunit, respectively, because antibodies directed against the two individual proteins were available and highly specific when tested by immunoblotting (Fig. 2A). Immunolocalization of rpL23a and rpS6 revealed the expected cytoplasmic staining for both proteins. When the cells were extracted under harsher conditions using a mixture of acetone/methanol during the fixation/permeabilization step, a faint nucleolar signal was also observed. Upon treatment of HeLa cells with LMB, the intranuclear signal increased significantly for both proteins (Fig. 2B). RpL23a mainly accumulated in the nucleoli of the LMB-treated cells. The staining pattern of rpS6 differed in that the antibody detected the protein mainly in the nucleoplasm and only to some degree in the nucleoli, as revealed upon extraction of the cells with acetone/methanol. The nucleoplasmic staining of rpS6 might either be because of a defect of rpS6 incorporation into pre-40S subunits or reflect a nucleoplasmic accumulation of pre-40S subunits upon inactivation of CRM1. In general, LMB-induced nuclear accumulation of the endogenous ribosomal proteins confirms the foregoing observations made with the GFP-tagged ribosomal proteins.
|
For both approaches presented so far, we could formally not exclude the possibility that the ribosomal proteins detected in the nucleus may not be part of ribosomal subunits. To directly access the location of both subunits, we next studied the effect of LMB on the intracellular distribution of rRNAs by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) using digoxigenin-labeled oligonucleotides. These probes were directed towards the mature 18S and 28S rRNAs, respectively, and hence suited to detect the ribosomal RNAs during all stages of their biosynthesis. In untreated cells, both ribosomal subunits were detected in the cytoplasmic compartment and to different extent in the nucleoli (Fig. 3). When cells were exposed to LMB, the nucleoplasmic signal detected with the 18S rRNA probe increased, whereas 28S rRNA accumulated mainly in the nucleoli. Again, as for the detection of the endogenous ribosomal proteins, LMB treatment induced a more nucleoplasmic accumulation of the small subunit whereas the large subunit appeared to be deficient in leaving the nucleolus. Taken together, we have demonstrated using three different experimental approaches that the inhibition of the CRM1 export pathway by LMB treatment induces defects in the biogenesis and nuclear export of both ribosomal subunits.
|
NES peptides compete for the nuclear export of ribosomal
subunits
Although our LMB experiments strongly indicated a role for CRM1 in
ribosomal subunit export, we wanted to gain more supportive evidence, because
we had to treat HeLa cells with LMB for long periods (5 to 18 hours) to
observe the nuclear accumulation of ribosomal subunit markers. To investigate
nuclear export of newly synthesized ribosomal RNAs, we used an experimental
system ideally suited to follow the fate of freshly synthesized ribosomal
subunits. In Xenopus oocytes, ribosomal RNAs are actively transcribed
from a cluster of amplified rRNA genes. These precursor rRNAs can be
metabolically labeled by injection of the oocytes with
[-32P]-GTP and their processing to the mature rRNAs analyzed
upon extraction of the rRNAs. Specific rRNA intermediates are characteristic
for these processing reactions (Fig.
4A). Ribosomal subunit export can be monitored upon manual
dissection of the oocytes into a cytoplasmic and nuclear fraction and
subsequent analysis of the distribution of newly synthesized 18S and 28S rRNAs
(Fig. 4B). 18S rRNA started to
accumulate in the cytoplasm three hours after injection of the label. 28S rRNA
appeared in the cytoplasmic fraction approximately four hours later,
indicating that the maturation of the large subunit takes longer than that of
the small subunit. In addition, several processing intermediates could be
observed. Only the mature rRNAs were exported to the cytoplasm.
|
To analyze the involvement of CRM1 in the nuclear export of the ribosomal
subunits in the oocytes, we tested the effect of competing concentrations of
NES peptides on the cytoplasmic delivery of the newly synthesized ribosomal
subunits. Peptides comprising the NES of protein kinase A inhibitor (PKI),
known as potent competitors of CRM1-mediated NES protein export
(Fischer et al., 1995;
Fornerod et al., 1997
;
Pasquinelli et al., 1997
),
were coupled to BSA. These conjugates were injected into the oocyte nuclei 3
or 5 hours after application of the radioactive label. Two hours later, rRNA
was isolated from nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions. The nuclear export of
both 18S rRNA and 28S rRNA was efficiently competed by nuclear injection of
BSA-NES (NESwt, Fig. 4B, lanes
7, 8, 15 and 16). Injection of a peptide, in which two of the critical leucine
residues of the NES were mutated to alanines (NESmut), did not affect export
of the ribosomal subunits, demonstrating the specificity of the competition
with the wild-type NES peptides (compare lanes 3 to 6 with 7 and 8 as well as
lanes 11 to 14 with 15 and 16). In the presence of the BSA-NESwt competitor,
the nuclear export of the rRNAs was drastically reduced such that there was no
significant increase in the cytoplasmic signal whereas the nuclear signal of
the mature rRNAs was enhanced in comparison to the control injections.
Quantification of the data revealed that after 5 hours in the absence of
competitor, approximately 70% of the newly synthesized 18S rRNA had been
exported. In the presence of competitor during the last two hours of the
experiment, export was reduced to 28%. If export was analyzed 7 hours after
labeling, 85% of 18S rRNA and 32% of 28S rRNA had reached the cytoplasm. The
two hours competition with NES peptides reduced export of 18S rRNA and 28S
rRNA to 38% and 4%, respectively. Taken together, our results show that
nuclear export of 40S and 60S subunits requires the CRM1 export pathway.
To exclude a toxic, non-specific effect of the injected peptides on nuclear
export, we performed an additional control experiment. The NES competitor
should not affect export of a substrate that is exported by a different
transport receptor. We selected importin (Imp
) as a model
protein, which is exported by the exportin CAS
(Kutay et al., 1997
). A
mixture of in vitro translated, radiolabeled Imp
, GST-NES and GST-GST,
which served as an injection control, was injected into the nuclei of
Xenopus oocytes (see supplementary
Fig. 1:
http://jcs.biologists.org/supplemental).
After 2 hours, the GST-NES fusion protein had been exported out of the nucleus
and also approximately 50% of Imp
was found in the cytoplasmic
fraction, probably reflecting its steady state distribution in the oocytes
(Izaurralde et al., 1997
).
Coinjection of the NES competitor reduced GST-NES export but did not affect
export of Imp
.
Human NMD3 possesses a functional leucine-rich NES
As is the case for CRM1-mediated export of other RNPs, the CRM1 dependence
of ribosomal subunit export suggested the involvement of one or more
NES-containing adaptor proteins in this export pathway. Yeast Nmd3p had been
proposed to serve such a function for pre-60S subunits
(Ho et al., 2000b;
Gadal et al., 2001
). Proteins
homologous to S.c.Nmd3p exist not only in other fungi and metazoans
but also in archaebacteria, suggesting that Nmd3p might play a primary role in
ribosomal function unrelated to nuclear export. However, Nmd3p in yeast is a
shuttling protein that has acquired an additional C-terminal domain containing
a conserved leucine-rich NES and a potential nuclear localization signal (NLS)
(Fig. 5A). This domain is found
in NMD3 from all eukaryotes.
|
To analyze whether the C-terminal NES-like sequence present in human NMD3
(hNMD3) is a functional export signal recognized by CRM1, we first determined
whether the intracellular localization of hNMD3 is affected by LMB. A
GFP-hNMD3 fusion protein was expressed in transiently transfected HeLa cells
and found to be localized primarily to the cytoplasm
(Fig. 5B). In addition, some
nuclear signal excluded from the nucleoli could be detected. LMB treatment of
HeLa cells for 2 hours (data not shown) or 4 hours caused relocalization of
the chimeric protein such that it was almost exclusively in the nucleoplasm.
Mutant forms of hNMD3 lacking the last 27 or 71 amino acids containing the NES
sequence, GFP-hNMD3C27 and GFP-hNMD3
C71, were already mainly
nuclear in the absence of LMB and did not change localization upon LMB
treatment. Interestingly, GFP-hNMD3
C71 was also found in the nucleoli.
When two leucine residues of the potential C-terminal NES in the full length
protein were changed to alanines, the GFP fusion protein was predominantly
nuclear and insensitive to LMB exposure of the cells. These results suggested
that hNMD3 is exported from the nucleus via interaction of CRM1 with the
C-terminal NES in hNMD3.
Recombinant hNMD3 binds to 60S ribosomal subunits and can directly
interact with CRM1
To investigate the biochemical properties of the potential export adaptor
hNMD3, we expressed 6His-hNMD3 in E. coli. The purified protein was
first tested for binding to 60S subunits, using a co-sedimentation assay.
Increasing amounts of 6His-hNMD3 were incubated with purified cytoplasmic 60S
subunits. Then, ribosomal subunits and bound hNMD3 were separated from unbound
protein by a short ultracentrifugation. In the absence of 60S subunits, all of
the 6His-hNMD3 was soluble and retrieved in the supernatant
(Fig. 6A, lanes 1 and 2). In
the presence of 60S ribosomal subunits, hNMD3 co-sedimented and this
association was saturable suggesting that binding might occur at specific
interaction site(s). Control experiments showed that there was no binding of
unrelated factors, such as snurportin
(Huber et al., 1998), to 60S
subunits (data not shown). When we tested hNMD3 binding to 40S subunits, as
expected, the majority of hNMD3 stayed in the supernatant although a minor
portion was recovered in the 40S pellet (data not shown). However, in vivo,
yeast Nmd3p exclusively binds to 60S subunits
(Ho and Johnson, 1999
;
Ho et al., 2000a
). To confirm
that recombinant hNMD3 preferentially binds to 60S subunits in vitro, we
incubated hNMD3 with a mixture of equal amounts of 40S and 60S subunits. After
separation of the subunits on a sucrose density gradient, hNMD3 was found on
top of the gradient representing the pool of unbound hNMD3 and, in addition,
in the fractions containing 60S subunits but not in the part of the gradient
containing 40S subunits (Fig.
6B). Taken together, similar to what has been reported for yeast
Nmd3p, human recombinant NMD3 binds to cytoplasmic 60S subunits. A
differentially tagged version of hNMD3, 2z-hNMD3 containing two N-terminal
IgG-binding domains (z-tag) derived from protein A, also bound to 60S subunits
in a saturable manner although with slightly reduced efficiency (data not
shown and supplementary Fig. 2
at
jcs.biologists.org/supplemental).
In summary, recombinant hNMD3 fulfilled one expectation of an export adaptor,
namely binding to 60S ribosomal subunits.
|
S.c.Nmd3p has been suggested to provide a link between the 60S
preribosomal subunits and the exportin CRM1. It has, however, never been
demonstrated that NMD3 and CRM1 interact directly. Thus, we next performed in
vitro binding experiments using purified 2z-hNMD3 and CRM1. As presented in
Fig. 7A, 2z-hNMD3 could
directly bind CRM1 and recruit the exportin into the IgG-bound fraction in a
pull-down assay. Complex formation was dependent on the presence of RanGTP
(compare lanes 3 and 4), as expected for a bona fide exportin-cargo
interaction. Significantly, the 2z-hNMD3C27 mutant protein, lacking the
C-terminal leucine-rich NES sequence, bound CRM1 at background levels and
binding was not further stimulated by the presence of RanGTP (compare lanes 6
and 7 with lane 1).
|
The binding of RanGTP and export substrates to exportins is often
co-operative (Fornerod et al.,
1997; Kutay et al.,
1997
). Hence, RanGTP should stimulate the binding of hNMD3 to CRM1
and hNMD3 should in turn enhance the interaction between CRM1 and RanGTP.
Quantitative measurement of complex formation between RanGTP-binding transport
receptors and RanGTP can be performed using the RanGTPase assay. The assay
measures protection of GTP on Ran from RanGAP-induced GTP hydrolysis when
RanGTP is bound to a nuclear transport receptor
(Floer and Blobel, 1996
;
Görlich et al., 1996
).
Most exportins have a low affinity for RanGTP and can only efficiently bind
and protect RanGTP against RanGAP-induced GTP hydrolysis when the export
substrate is also present (Kutay et al.,
1997
; Kutay et al.,
1998
; Paraskeva et al.,
1999
). We observed the same effect for 2z-hNMD3 on the CRM1-RanGTP
interaction. Incubation of RanGTP with high concentrations of CRM1 alone did
not protect Ran-bound GTP from RanGAP-induced GTP hydrolysis
(Fig. 7B, open triangles).
However, in the presence of 2 µM 2z-hNMD3, increasing concentrations of
CRM1 led to a progressive inhibition of RanGAP-induced GTP hydrolysis
(Fig. 7B, stars). Half-maximal
inhibition was observed at a CRM1 concentration of approximately 30 nM. Thus,
2z-hNMD3 is able to form a stable complex with RanGTP and CRM1. In agreement
with the data from the pull-down experiments, 2z-hNMD3
C27 was unable to
bind to CRM1 and could not force CRM1 into a protective complex with RanGTP
(Fig. 7B, squares).
Surprisingly, we found that CRM1 bound to 6His-hNMD3 only weakly, showing a
half-maximal inhibition at approximately 600 nM CRM1. The association of
6His-hNMD3 with CRM1 was approximately a factor of 20 weaker compared to the
2z-tagged version of the protein. This difference might be explained by
distinct folding properties of the differentially tagged proteins and account
for the previous failure of others to demonstrate a Crm1p-Nmd3p interaction.
In summary, hNMD3 contains a functional C-terminal NES that directly interacts
with CRM1 in a manner consistent with other exportin-cargo interactions.
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
More direct evidence that CRM1 is needed for nuclear export of pre-40S and
pre-60S subunits comes from our studies on ribosomal biogenesis in
Xenopus oocytes (Fig.
4). Competition experiments with NES peptides allowed us to
monitor the fate of mature nuclear rRNAs and to directly investigate the role
of CRM1 in their export. The nuclear injection of the NES peptide-conjugates
affected rRNA processing only slightly but at the same time efficiently
reduced the export of the mature rRNAs, demonstrating that CRM1 is most
probably required at a step following assembly of the subunits, namely for the
cytoplasmic delivery of the subunits. Our data indicate that ribosomal subunit
biogenesis and export in vertebrates are dependent on a functional CRM1 export
pathway similar to what has been observed in S. cerevisiae. Yeast
cells bearing a LMB-sensitive version of Crm1p accumulate pre-40S in the
nucleoplasm rapidly upon treatment with the drug. Furthermore, nuclear export
of pre-40S subunits is impaired in a yeast strain harboring a deletion of YRB2
or by Yrb2p overexpression (Moy and
Silver, 2002). Yrb2p is a co-factor required for the efficient
export of NES substrates. Although the export of pre-60S subunits is dependent
on the CRM1 export pathway, it is not affected by a YRB2 deletion
(Ho et al., 2000b
;
Gadal et al., 2001
;
Moy and Silver, 2002
).
The crucial, yet unresolved question is whether CRM1 mediates nuclear
export of pre-ribosomal subunits by associating directly with the subunits or
with ribosomal export adaptor proteins. Currently, no information is available
as to how, or if, Crm1p binds to pre-40S. However, based on several findings,
it has been proposed that yeast Nmd3p serves as an export adaptor for CRM1 in
60S subunit export (see Introduction). As demonstrated here, human NMD3 also
possesses features of a 60S export adaptor. hNMD3 behaves like a
nucleo-cytoplasmic shuttling protein. It is localized to both the cytoplasm
and the nucleus in HeLa cells and cytoplasmic residence depends on a conserved
C-terminal leucine-rich export signal. Inactivation of CRM1 leads to a rapid
nuclear accumulation of GFP-hNMD3 (Fig.
5). In addition, expression of mutant forms of NMD3 lacking the
C-terminal NES causes a dominant negative inhibition of 60S subunit export in
Xenopus oocytes (Trotta et al.,
2003).
However, several points must be addressed to unambiguously prove the suggested role of hNMD3 or S.c.Nmd3p as export adaptor for 60S subunits. First, a direct interaction between CRM1 and NMD3 needs to be demonstrated. Here, we have shown for the first time, using pull-down and RanGAP protection assays, that human NMD3 can form a stable complex with CRM1 in the presence of RanGTP (Fig. 7). The C-terminal NES of hNMD3 is required for this interaction. Surprisingly, we found that differentially tagged hNMD3 proteins showed differences in the strength of their interaction with CRM1. Although 2z-hNMD3 bound CRM1 strongly, 6His-hNMD3 displayed only a weak interaction. This difference might be because of differences in the folding and, hence, accessibility of the NES in the differentially tagged proteins. The NES in 6His-hNMD3 appears to be hidden. An interesting possibility would be that 6His-hNMD3 mimics the conformation of endogenous hNMD3. It is tempting to speculate that endogenous hNMD3 undergoes a conformational change to expose its NES upon binding to a partner in the nucleus. This switch would prevent futile cycles of hNMD3 shuttling. According to the simplest model, this nuclear binding partner would be pre-60S ribosomal subunits.
Second, it has not been demonstrated that Nmd3p can recruit Crm1p onto
pre-60S subunits. As a first step in this direction, we tested the
hNMD3-dependent binding of CRM1 to cytoplasmic 60S subunits (see supplementary
data:
http://jcs.biologists.org/supplemental).
However, neither 6His-hNMD3 nor 2z-hNMD3 supported the association of CRM1
with the subunits. The complex might be too unstable to detect this
interaction, although the timespan of the experiment did not exceed the one
used to show CRM1/2z-hNMD3 complex formation in the pull-down experiment
(Fig. 7A). Alternatively,
although S.c.Nmd3p is mainly found associated with cytoplasmic 60S
subunits, these subunits might differ in some way from export competent,
nuclear pre-60S subunits, so that NMD3 can recruit CRM1 only to the nuclear
form of the subunit. We have been unable to isolate nuclear pre-60S subunits
from vertebrate cells in sufficient quantities and homogeneity to use them as
a tool for testing NMD3-dependent recruitment of CRM1. It should be noted that
also in yeast, neither Crm1p nor Ran has been detected on supposedly
nucleoplasmic pre-60S subunits whereas Nmd3p was present
(Nissan et al., 2002). This
may indicate that the association of CRM1 with these subunits is too transient
to detect or that the complex does not resist the particular purification
procedure that was used.
Finally, the formal possibility exists that NMD3 does not directly
contribute to 60S subunit export. For example, NMD3 could be an inhibitor of
60S subunit export, which might have to be kept out of the nucleus to allow
the efficient pre-60S export. It has been argued that Nmd3p is unlikely to be
such an inhibitor of 60S subunit export, because overexpression of wild-type
Nmd3p does not impair 60S subunit export in yeast
(Johnson et al., 2002).
Alternatively, Nmd3p might mediate the export of an unidentified inhibitor of
60S biogenesis. If Nmd3p would contribute to the export of an inhibitory
factor, then overexpression of Nmd3p would not be expected to be inhibitory.
But still, the most compelling argument in favor of a direct role of Nmd3p in
60S subunit export is its association with nuclear pre-60S subunits in yeast
(Nissan et al., 2002
).
In summary, we have demonstrated that nuclear export of both the small and large ribosomal subunit in vertebrate cells requires a functional CRM1 export pathway. It remains to be investigated in future, how CRM1 is recruited to pre-ribosomal subunits in the nucleus. For pre-60S subunits, a candidate export adaptor is hNMD3. Both in yeast and vertebrates, the identity of a potential export adaptor for 40S pre-ribosomal subunits is still entirely open.
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Arts, G. J., Fornerod, M. and Mattaj, I. W. (1998). Identification of a nuclear export receptor for tRNA. Curr. Biol. 8,305 -314.[Medline]
Bassler, J., Grandi, P., Gadal, O., Lessmann, T., Petfalski, E., Tollervey, D., Lechner, J. and Hurt, E. (2001). Identification of a 60S preribosomal particle that is closely linked to nuclear export. Mol. Cell 8, 517-529.[Medline]
Bataillé, N., Helser, T. and Fried, H. M. (1990). Cytoplasmic transport of ribosomal subunits microinjected into the Xenopus laevis oocyte nucleus: a generalized, facilitated process. J. Cell Biol. 111,1571 -1582.[Abstract]
Bischoff, F. R., Krebber, H., Smirnova, E., Dong, W. H. and Ponstingl, H. (1995). Coactivation of RanGTPase and inhibition of GTP dissociation by Ran GTP binding protein RanBP1. EMBO J. 14,705 -715.[Abstract]
Calado, A. and Carmo-Fonseca, M. (2000).
Localization of poly(A)-binding protein 2 (PABP2) in nuclear speckles is
independent of import into the nucleus and requires binding to poly(A) RNA.
J. Cell Sci. 113,2309
-2318.
Calado, A., Treichel, N., Muller, E. C., Otto, A. and Kutay,
U. (2002). Exportin-5-mediated nuclear export of eukaryotic
elongation factor 1A and tRNA. EMBO J.
21,6216
-6224.
Carvalho, C., Pereira, H. M., Ferreira, J., Pina, C., Mendonca,
D., Rosa, A. C. and Carmo-Fonseca, M. (2001).
Chromosomal G-dark bands determine the spatial organization of centromeric
heterochromatin in the nucleus. Mol. Biol. Cell
12,3563
-3572.
Englmeier, L., Fornerod, M., Bischoff, F. R., Petosa, C.,
Mattaj, I. W. and Kutay, U. (2001). RanBP3 influences
interactions between CRM1 and its nuclear protein export substrates.
EMBO Rep. 2,926
-932.
Fatica, A., Cronshaw, A. D., Dlakic, M. and Tollervey, D. (2002). Ssf1p prevents premature processing of an early pre-60S ribosomal particle. Mol. Cell 9, 341-351.[Medline]
Fatica, A. and Tollervey, D. (2002). Making ribosomes. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14,313 -318.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fischer, U., Huber, J., Boelens, W. C., Mattaj, I. W. and Lührmann, R. (1995). The HIV-1 Rev activation domain is a nuclear export signal that accesses an export pathway used by specific cellular RNAs. Cell 82,475 -483.[Medline]
Floer, M. and Blobel, G. (1996). The nuclear
transport factor karyopherin ß binds stoichiometrically to Ran-GTP and
inhibits the Ran GTPase activating protein. J. Biol.
Chem. 271,5313
-5316.
Fornerod, M., Ohno, M., Yoshida, M. and Mattaj, I. W. (1997). Crm1 is an export receptor for leucine rich nuclear export signals. Cell 90,1051 -1060.[Medline]
Fukuda, M., Asano, S., Nakamura, T., Adachi, M., Yoshida, M., Yanagida, M. and Nishida, E. (1997). CRM1 is responsible for intracellular transport mediated by the nuclear export signal. Nature 390,308 -311.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gadal, O., Strauss, D., Kessl, J., Trumpower, B., Tollervey, D.
and Hurt, E. (2001). Nuclear export of 60s ribosomal
subunits depends on Xpo1p and requires a nuclear export sequence-containing
factor, Nmd3p, that associates with the large subunit protein Rpl10p.
Mol. Cell. Biol. 21,3405
-3415.
Görlich, D., Pante, N., Kutay, U., Aebi, U. and Bischoff, F. R. (1996). Identification of different roles for RanGDP and RanGTP in nuclear protein import. EMBO J. 15,5584 -5594.[Abstract]
Görlich, D., Dabrowski, M., Bischoff, F. R., Kutay, U.,
Bork, P., Hartmann, E., Prehn, S. and Izaurralde, E.
(1997). A novel class of RanGTP binding proteins. J.
Cell Biol. 138,65
-80.
Görlich, D. and Kutay, U. (1999). Transport between the cell nucleus and the cytoplasm. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 15,607 -660.[CrossRef][Medline]
Harnpicharnchai, P., Jakovljevic, J., Horsey, E., Miles, T., Roman, J., Rout, M., Meagher, D., Imai, B., Guo, Y., Brame, C. J. et al. (2001). Composition and functional characterization of yeast 66S ribosome assembly intermediates. Mol. Cell 8, 505-515.[Medline]
Ho, J. H. and Johnson, A. W. (1999). NMD3
encodes an essential cytoplasmic protein required for stable 60S ribosomal
subunits in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell.
Biol. 19,2389
-2399.
Ho, J. H., Kallstrom, G. and Johnson, A. W.
(2000a). Nascent 60S ribosomal subunits enter the free pool bound
by Nmd3p. RNA 6,1625
-1634.
Ho, J. H., Kallstrom, G. and Johnson, A. W.
(2000b). Nmd3p is a Crm1p-dependent adapter protein for nuclear
export of the large ribosomal subunit. J. Cell Biol.
151,1057
-1066.
Huber, J., Cronshagen, U., Kadokura, M., Marshallsay, C., Wada,
T., Sekine, M. and Lührmann, R. (1998).
Snurportin1, an m3G-cap-specific nuclear import receptor with a novel domain
structure. EMBO J. 17,4114
-4126.
Hurt, E., Hannus, S., Schmelzl, B., Lau, D., Tollervey, D. and
Simos, G. (1999). A novel in vivo assay reveals inhibition of
ribosomal nuclear export in ran-cycle and nucleoporin mutants. J.
Cell Biol. 144,389
-401.
Izaurralde, E., Kutay, U., von Kobbe, C., Mattaj, I. W. and
Görlich, D. (1997). The asymmetric distribution of the
constituents of the Ran system is essential for transport into and out of the
nucleus. EMBO J. 16,6535
-6547.
Johnson, A. W., Lund, E. and Dahlberg, J. (2002). Nuclear export of ribosomal subunits. Trends Biochem. Sci. 27,580 -585.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kressler, D., Linder, P. and de la Cruz, J.
(1999). Protein transcting factors involved in ribosome
biogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell.
Biol. 19,7897
-7912.
Kudo, N., Matsumori, N., Taoka, H., Fujiwara, D., Schreiner, E.
P., Wolff, B., Yoshida, M. and Horinouchi, S. (1999).
Leptomycin B inactivates CRM1/exportin 1 by covalent modification at a
cysteine residue in the central conserved region. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA 96,9112
-9117.
Kutay, U., Bischoff, F. R., Kostka, S., Kraft, R. and Görlich, D. (1997). Export of importin alpha from the nucleus is mediated by a specific nuclear transport factor. Cell 90,1061 -1071.[Medline]
Kutay, U., Lipowsky, G., Izaurralde, E., Bischoff, F. R., Schwarzmaier, P., Hartmann, E. and Görlich, D. (1998). Identification of a tRNA-specific nuclear export receptor. Mol. Cell 1,359 -369.[Medline]
Kutay, U., Hartmann, E., Treichel, N., Calado, A.,
Carmo-Fonseca, M., Prehn, S., Kraft, R., Gorlich, D. and Bischoff, F.
R. (2000). Identification of two novel RanGTP-binding
proteins belonging to the importin beta superfamily. J. Biol.
Chem. 275,40163
-40168.
Mattaj, I. W. and Englmeier, L. (1998). Nucleocytoplasmic transport: the soluble phase. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67,265 -306.[CrossRef][Medline]
Moy, T. I. and Silver, P. A. (1999). Nuclear
export of the small ribosomal subunit requires the ran-GTPase cycle and
certain nucleoporins. Genes Dev.
13,2118
-2133.
Moy, T. I. and Silver, P. A. (2002).
Requirements for the nuclear export of the small ribosomal subunit.
J. Cell Sci. 115,2985
-2995.
Nissan, T. A., Bassler, J., Petfalski, E., Tollervey, D. and
Hurt, E. (2002). 60S pre-ribosome formation viewed from
assembly in the nucleolus until export to the cytoplasm. EMBO
J. 21,5539
-5547.
Ohno, M., Segref, A., Bachi, A., Wilm, M. and Mattaj, I. W. (2000). PHAX, a mediator of U snRNA nuclear export whose activity is regulated by phosphorylation. Cell 101,187 -198.[Medline]
Ossareh-Nazari, B., Bachelerie, F. and Dargemont, C.
(1997). Evidence for a role of CRM1 in signal-mediated nuclear
protein export. Science
278,141
-144.
Paraskeva, E., Izaurralde, E., Bischoff, F. R., Huber, J.,
Kutay, U., Hartmann, E., Lührmann, R. and Görlich, D.
(1999). CRM1-mediated recycling of snurportin 1 to the cytoplasm.
J. Cell Biol. 145,255
-264.
Pasquinelli, A. E., Powers, M. A., Lund, E., Forbes, D. and
Dahlberg, J. E. (1997). Inhibition of mRNA export in
vertebrate cells by nuclear export signal conjugates. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA 94,14394
-14399.
Peculis, B. A. (1997). The sequence of the 5' end of the U8 small nucleolar RNA is critical for 5.8S and 28S rRNA maturation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17,3702 -3713.[Abstract]
Pool, M. R., Stumm, J., Fulga, T. A., Sinning, I. and
Dobberstein, B. (2002). Distinct modes of signal recognition
particle interaction with the ribosome. Science
297,1345
-1348.
Rothblum, L. I., Parker, D. L. and Cassidy, B. (1982). Isolation and characterization of rat ribosomal DNA clones. Gene 17,75 -77.[Medline]
Saveanu, C., Bienvenu, D., Namane, A., Gleizes, P. E., Gas, N.,
Jacquier, A. and Fromont-Racine, M. (2001). Nog2p, a
putative GTPase associated with pre-60S subunits and required for late 60S
maturation steps. EMBO J.
20,6475
-6484.
Stade, K., Ford, C. S., Guthrie, C. and Weis, K. (1997). Exportin 1 (Crm1p) is an essential nuclear export factor. Cell 90,1041 -1050.[Medline]
Stage-Zimmermann, T., Schmidt, U. and Silver, P. A.
(2000). Factors affecting nuclear export of the 60S ribosomal
subunit in vivo. Mol. Biol. Cell
11,3777
-3789.
Subrahmanyam, C. S., Cassidy, B., Busch, H. and Rothblum, L. I. (1982). Nucleotide sequence of the region between the 18S rRNA sequence and the 28S rRNA sequence of rat ribosomal DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 10,3667 -3680.[Abstract]
Trotta, C. R., Lund, E. L., Kahan, L., Johnson, A. W. and Dahlberg, J. E. (2003). Coordinated nuclear export of 60S ribosomal subunits and NMD3. EMBO J. (in press).
Warner, J. R. (2001). Nascent ribosomes. Cell 107,133 -136.[Medline]