1 Department of Medicine III, Clinical Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
2 Max F. Perutz Laboratories, Department of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Campus Vienna Biocenter 5/1, 1030 Vienna, Austria
Author for correspondence (e-mail: christina.maier{at}meduniwien.ac.at)
Accepted 28 April 2005
![]() |
Summary |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Nongenomic, Pituitary, ACTH release, Glucocorticoid receptor, Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Additionally, a distinct class of membrane steroid receptors, unrelated to their intracellular counterparts, exist: the first unique vertebrate membrane steroid receptor, a progestin receptor that belongs to a new family of G-protein-coupled receptors, has been cloned and characterized recently (Zhu et al., 2003a; Zhu et al., 2003b
).
Glucocorticoids (GCs) are, like cortisol or corticosterone (the main glucocorticoids of humans and rodents, respectively), a class of steroid hormones produced in the adrenal gland upon stimulation by the pituitary hormone adrenocorticotropin (ACTH). They are of vital importance in stress- and immune reactions as well as for metabolism, and affect virtually every cell in the body. GC blood levels are thus tightly regulated. By means of a feedback mechanism, GCs inhibit ACTH synthesis (Muglia et al., 2000) and release (Hinz and Hirschelmann, 2000
; Antoni et al., 1992
; Loechner et al., 1999
). This latter effect occurs in vivo on a timescale of minutes (Hinz and Hirschelmann, 2000
) and can be considered a physiological, nongenomic steroid effect.
The ACTH-producing mouse pituitary cell line AtT-20 is used as a model system for the fast-feedback inhibition of ACTH-release by GCs (Antoni et al., 1992; Loechner et al., 1999
). Dexamethasone, a potent synthetic GC, inhibits ACTH-release in this cell line in less than 10 minutes (Loechner et al., 1999
). The existence of a membrane glucocorticoid receptor (mGR) was suggested as the result of binding studies of isolated AtT-20 cell membranes with radiolabeled ligands (Harrison et al., 1979
; Spindler et al., 1991
), and confocal microscopy with antibodies directed against the intracellular glucocorticoid receptor (iGR) on lymphoma cells (Gametchu, 1987
) and blood leukocytes (Bartholome et al., 2004
). To our knowledge, data on affinity and binding characteristics of these membrane GC-binding sites have, until now, never been published.
The aim of our study was to find specific binding of a GC ligand to the cell membrane of living AtT-20 cells. We decided to use fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) (Magde et al., 1972; Maiti et al., 1997
) for this purpose. FCS measurements are non-invasive and can be carried out under equilibrium conditions in aqueous solution. Fluctuations in signal-intensity are recorded when fluorescence-labeled molecules diffuse through the excitation volume, and are quantified by autocorrelation analysis. Thus, faster and slower diffusion times can be assigned to unbound and bound ligand states, respectively. FCS has been used to investigate bacterial motor proteins (Cluzel et al., 2000
), p53 latency (Yakovleva et al., 2001
), active transport in plastid tubules (Köhler et al., 2000
), amyloid-ß-protein aggregates in cerebrospinal fluid (Pitschke et al., 1998
) and ultrasensitive pathogen detection (Oehlenschlager et al., 1996
; Korn et al., 2003
), and to study diffusion behavior of and ligand binding to membrane receptors on single cells (Briddon et al., 2004
; Patel et al., 2002
; Rigler et al., 1999
; Zhong et al., 2001
; Pramanik et al., 2001
; Pick et al., 2003
; Licht et al., 2003
; Schwille et al., 1999a
; Schwille et al., 1999b
).
In the case of studying GC membrane-binding, a possible interference of ligand, binding to the iGR, had to be excluded when measuring on whole cells. In a preliminary methodological study we used a `scanning' procedure through the cell to measure membrane-binding as opposed to intracellular diffusion and/or binding of fluorescein-labeled dexamethasone (F-dexa) and found a characteristic, slowly diffusing component that was present exclusively on the cell membrane (Maier et al., 2002). Based on this model, the data presented here demonstrate specific and high-affinity binding of F-dexa on the membrane of AtT-20 cells.
![]() |
Materials and Methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Cell culture
Cells were maintained at 37°C, 6% CO2, 95% relative humidity in 75 cm2 cell culture flasks in HAM's F10 medium (supplemented with 12.5% horse serum, 2.5% fetal calf serum and antibiotics). The medium was changed twice weekly and cells were subcultured every 4 weeks. For the binding experiments only cells with a passage number up to five were used.
Incubation
Cells were transferred to poly-D-lysine coated LabTek chambered coverglass on the day of experiments and allowed to attach for 1 hour before washing them gently two times with phosphate buffered saline and replacing the culture medium with non-fluorescent binding buffer (containing 145 mM NaCl, 4 mM KCl, 1 mM Na2HPO4, 0.8 mM CaCl2, 25 mM HEPES and 22 mM glucose). AtT-20 cells showed a very low uncorrelated autofluorescence of approximately 0.3 kHz. The viability of the cells was >90% after 3 hours of incubation at room temperature in the binding buffer (as assessed by Trypan Blue staining). The time required for measurements did not exceed 1.5 h.
To generate the binding curve, F-dexa was added in varying concentrations and cells were incubated for 1 hour at 37°C; measurements were carried out immediately afterwards at 20°C. Pure F-dexa was used for the low-concentration range (up to 80 nM); for the higher concentrations (240 and 540 nM) 80 nM F-dexa was mixed with unlabeled dexamethasone. Measurements using 100, 120, 140 and 160 nM were done with mixtures as well as with pure F-dexa solutions. For each concentration five cells from at least two independent incubation experiments were measured, and measurements were taken in triplicates.
The specificity of F-dexa binding was tested in a 3-hour preincubation experiment, with the unlabeled steroids dexamethasone, corticosterone, estradiol and progesterone at a 500-fold excess (60 µM) at 37°C, followed by a 1-hour incubation with 120 nM F-dexa. For each steroid, at least eight cells from three independent incubation experiments were measured in triplicates. Preincubation experiments with dexamethasone were done with both cyclodextrin-complexed and pure substance, and since the effects did not differ between the two groups, resulting data were pooled together. Preincubation with binding buffer alone was used as control in each experiment.
Preincubation with the GC-receptor antagonist RU486 (60 µM) and PTX (1 µg/ml) were performed in the same way as described for the specificity experiments; heat-inactivated PTX (1 µg/ml) served as negative control for the latter experiments. For each substance, at least seven cells from three independent experiments were measured in triplicates.
Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy
FCS measurements were carried out on a Confocor spectrofluorimeter (Carl Zeiss-Evotec, Jena, Germany) equipped with an Ar-laser, a water immersion objective (C-Apochromat 63x/1.2 W Korr), an avalanche photodiode (SPCM-CD 3017) and a hardware autocorrelator (ALV 5000, ALV, Langen, Germany).
Samples were excited with the 488-nm Ar-laser-line attenuated by optical density filters, the fluorescence signal was detected through a dichroic mirror with bandpass filters. The pinhole diameter was set to 45 µm, resulting in a confocal volume element of 0.17 µm in the radial and 2.4 µm in the axial dimension as determined by calibration using rhodamine 6G.
The confocal volume was positioned in the cells using an x-y stage with 1 µm resolution, whereas the correct focus positioning on the cell membrane was ascertained by a scanning procedure (Maier et al., 2002). Briefly, the focus position was moved in 1-µm steps from outside the cell across the cell membrane towards the glass surface and measurements (15 seconds correlator scaling and 30 seconds measurement) were taken at each position. Measurements at the membrane position (typically 7-9 µm from the coverglass) were taken in triplicates and the correct positioning was re-evaluated at the end of each measurement series.
The signal response of F-dexa in solution was determined to be linear for up to 200 particles (corresponding to 1.6 µM F-dexa) in the focus; a negative control of pure fluorescein-dye incubated with the cells revealed unrestricted diffusion in all cellular compartments.
Data evaluation
A normalized autocorrelation function G() describes fluctuations with time around the mean measured intensity F, where angular brackets represent the ensemble average:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Probing of membrane fluidity
The lipophilic membrane marker 3,3'-dioctadecyloxacarbocyanine perchlorate (DiO) was from Molecular Probes. To label cells with DiO they were incubated with 10 µM DiO (in binding buffer) for 20 minutes. After this time, DiO was replaced with binding buffer containing either 60 µM dexamethasone (DEXA), 1 µg/ml PTX (PTX) or binding buffer alone (control, CO). Cells were then incubated for 1 hour before FCS measurements were performed. Autocorrelation curves were best fitted to the two-component model with component 1 corresponding to the diffusion time of DiO in solution and component
2 representing DiO diffusion on the cell membrane derived from the fitting procedure.
In total, 22 (27 for control) autocorrelation curves taken at the membrane position from four individual cells were evaluated for each experimental subgroup. Statistical evaluation was performed using SPSS 12.0 statistical software. Diffusion times and percent fraction of the slower diffusion component from the CO, DEXA and PTX subgroups were compared by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnet-t-test (two-sided, for comparison of either treatment group with CO) as post-hoc statistics, when appropriate. P<0.05 was set as level of statistical significance. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m.
|
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Increasing the concentration of F-dexa in the buffer-medium led to an increased proportion of the slowest component. In Fig. 2 the intensity fluctuation and autocorrelation curves are displayed for low, medium and high concentrations of F-dexa. Increase and broadening of the fluctuation peaks corresponded well with the increase of the slowest component in the autocorrelation curves.
|
A quantitative study of F-dexabinding on the cell membrane was based on the dependence of the autocorrelation data on the concentration of F-dexa. To obtain a binding isotherm over a suitably broad range of concentrations, it was necessary to mix labeled with unlabeled dexamethasone in the high concentration range (see Materials and Methods). In the intermediate range (100-160 nM), measurements were performed with pure F-dexa solutions as well as with mixtures to exclude a possible bias caused by this procedure.
|
|
Representative intensity fluctuations and corresponding autocorrelation curves for the various steroid hormones are given in Fig. 4. Preincubation with unlabeled dexamethasone reduced F-dexa membrane-binding from 58±2% (fraction of membrane-bound F-dexa in the control, mean ± s.e.m.) to 8±1%. Corticosterone, the natural ligand of the rodent GC receptor, reduced subsequent F-dexabinding to 29±2%, whereas progesterone (50±4%) and estradiol (56±4%) were unable to prevent F-dexabinding on the cell membrane. An overview of the results is given in Fig. 5.
|
The possible interaction with a Gi protein was assessed by preincubation with PTX (1 µg/ml). After 3 hours of PTX treatment, a subsequent incubation with F-dexa still led to enrichment of F-dexa in the cell membrane, but the 3 component was reduced to the same extent as in the preincubation experiments with a 500-fold excess of unlabeled dexamethasone (see above): 11±4 vs 58±2% (control). Instead, the
2 component (the component which is normally seen predominantly in the cytosol) showed a maximum on the position of the cell membrane. By contrast, heat-inactivated PTX was unable to alter subsequent F-dexabinding (data not shown). Representative intensity fluctuations and corresponding autocorrelation curves, and an overview of the results are given in Figs 6 and 7, respectively.
|
|
The fraction of the 2 component on the cell membrane was significantly different between groups (P<0.0001, one-way ANOVA). DEXA treatment led to a significant reduction of the
2 fraction (22.0±1.2%, DEXA vs 33.5±1.2%, CO; P<0.0001, Dunnet-T). By contrast, PTX did not change the
2 fraction (36.9±1.7%, PTX vs 33.5±1.2%, CO; P=0.15, Dunnet-T). Representative autocorrelation curves together with their two-component fits are shown in supplementary material, Fig. S1.
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Affinity data were obtained by incubation with different concentrations of F-dexa that resulted in an average Kd of 180 nM and a Bmax of 230 nM, indicating a binding affinity significantly lower than that of the iGR, which was determined using radioligands to be in the range of 5 nM or less (Schaaf and Cidlowski, 2003 and the references therein). Indeed, the nongenomic GC effects described so far all occur at higher concentrations than those necessary to saturate iGR binding. This also includes in vivo data, such as the vasorelaxing effect of dexamethasone in mice where the plasma concentrations for maximal effect were in the range of 100 nM (Hafezi-Moghadam et al., 2002
). GCs are used therapeutically in life-threatening conditions such as status asthmaticus, severe episodes of multiple sclerosis or systemic autoimmune diseases, and leukaemia. Initially, very high doses, resulting in GC plasma concentrations of several 100 nM, are used that are necessary for therapeutical effect. It has been postulated that at very high concentrations, GCs might be able to alter physico-chemical properties of cell membranes (the so-called `unspecific nongenomic effects' of GCs) and thus inhibit cation cycling across the cell membrane (Buttgereit et al., 2000
). The highest concentration of dexamethasone used in this study, 60 µM, competed with DiO for membrane incorporation but was unable to alter membrane fluidity. It is therefore highly unlikely that an unspecific nongenomic effect could cause the changes in diffusion behavior of F-dexa observed in our work.
Most remarkably, the binding curve that we were able to obtain with FCS revealed positive cooperativity of the binding process. Thus, ligand binding to the membrane binding sites enhances further binding. In other words, once a certain threshold in the concentration of GCs is reached, small changes in the GC concentration can elicit pronounced effects. Physiologically, GC plasma levels undergo diurnal variations, and the body can react very precisely to sudden alterations of cortisol (or corticosterone, for rodents) concentrations. It is not known, which GC concentrations are reached locally at the pituitary gland but under the assumption that the membrane binding sites described here are related to the feedback inhibition of ACTH release a membrane receptor with cooperative binding properties would be well suited to mediate rapid adaptations of the system required in situations of acute stress. Basal regulation might be mediated by GC-inhibition of ACTH synthesis via genomic pathways.
Specificity of dexamethasone binding was shown by preincubation experiments with various steroids. Not only unlabeled dexamethasone, but also the natural ligand corticosterone were able to prevent subsequent F-dexabinding, whereas the sex steroids estradiol and progesterone had no influence. Thus, F-dexa binds to GC-specific binding sites on the cell membrane of the corticotrope cell line AtT-20.
Like the affinity of binding, the binding characteristics were also clearly distinct from the iGR. The iGR antagonist RU486 was unable to prevent F-dexa membrane-binding, as was progesterone, which is known to bind albeit with low affinity to the iGR (which is expressed in the AtT-20 cell line in high abundance). Distinct membrane binding sites possibly related to opioid-like receptors have been found in the amphibian brain (Evans et al., 2000). By contrast, the mGR found on lymphoma cells and peripheral blood leukocytes was detected using an antibody against iGR (Gametchu, 1987
; Bartholome et al., 2004
), indicating structural resemblance of these binding sites with the iGR. With the data presented here, no direct conclusion on the structure of the binding sites can be drawn, because attachment to the cell membrane would certainly alter the binding characteristics of the iGR as well. However, it seems reasonable that distinct binding characteristics should be associated with distinct function.
Another remarkable feature of the observed binding is the small diffusion constant (3x10-10 cm2 s-1) obtained for the bound ligand. Measurements of ligand binding to cell membranes typically result in diffusion constants that are one order of magnitude higher (e.g. Briddon et al., 2004; Rigler et al., 1999
). Possible interpretations of a smaller diffusion constant are that the binding sites form huge clusters or, alternatively, that they are not freely diffusing in the cell membrane but are more closely attached to, e.g. the cytoskeleton. This interpretation is supported by the fact that preincubation with PTX abolished the
3 component in the autocorrelation function on the membrane position while F-dexa enrichment was still apparent. Pertussis toxin decouples G-proteins from the receptor through ADP ribosylation of the G
subunit. Since F-dexa can still bind to the receptor (the ligand is enriched in the cell membrane) it can be concluded that upon G-protein decoupling also clustering and/or cytoskeleton attachment of the receptor is disrupted. Like dexamethasone, PTX was unable to change membrane fluidity at the concentration used in our experiments.
Redistribution of the actin cytoskeleton plays a central role in ACTH-release (Mains et al., 1999) and has also been shown to be involved in rapid steroid effects. The steroid hormone testosterone has been described to increase PSA secretion from a prostate cell line through binding to a membrane receptor and modifying the actin cytoskeleton (Papakonstanti et al., 2003
). Testosterone is also able to act on GnRH release through a membrane receptor and this membrane AR-signaling has been shown to be coupled to a Gi protein (Shakil et al., 2002
). The estrogen receptor
has been shown to interact with the cytoskeletal protein p130Cas (which is involved in the linkage of the actin cytoskeleton to the extracellular matrix) resulting in Erk1/2 MAPK activation (Cabodi et al., 2004
).
In summary, this study demonstrates for the first time specific, positive cooperative and G-protein-coupled membrane glucocorticoid receptors, distinct from their intracellular counterparts and well suited to mediate acute HPA-axis regulation.
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
![]() |
Footnotes |
---|
* These authors contributed equally to this work
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Antoni, F. A., Hoyland, J., Woods, M. D. and Mason, W. T. (1992). Glucocorticoid inhibition of stimulus-evoked adrenocorticotropin release caused by suppression of intracellular calcium signals. J. Endocrinol. 133, R13-R16.[Abstract]
Bartholome, B., Spies, C. M., Gaber, T., Schuchmann, S., Berk, T., Kunkel, D., Bienert, M., Radbruch, A., Burmester, G. R., Lauster, R. et al. (2004). Membrane glucocorticoid receptors (mGCR) are expressed in normal human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and up-regulated after in vitro stimulation and in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. FASEB J. 18, 70-80.
Briddon, S. J., Middleton, R. J., Cordeaux, Y., Flavin, F. M., Weinstein, J. A., George, M. W., Kellam, B. and Hill, S. J. (2004). Quantitative analysis of the formation and diffusion of A1-adenosine receptor-antagonist complexes in single living cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 4673-4678.
Buttgereit, F., Burmester, G. R. and Brand, M. D. (2000). Therapeutically targeting lymphocyte energy metabolism by high-dose glucocorticoids. Biochem. Pharmacol. 59, 597-603.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cabodi, S., Moro, L., Baj, G., Smeriglio, M., Di Stefano, P., Gippone, S., Surico, N., Silengo, L., Turco, E., Tarone, G. et al. (2004). p130Cas interacts with estrogen receptor and modulates non-genomic estrogen signaling in breast cancer cells. J. Cell Sci. 117, 1603-1611.
Cantor, C. R. and Schimmel, P. R. (1980). Ligand interactions at equilibrium. In Biophysical Chemistry. Part III: The Behavior of Biological Macromolecule (ed. C. R. Cantor and P. R. Schimmel), pp. 863-866. New York: W. H. Freeman and Co.
Chambliss, K. L., Simon, L., Yuhanna, I. S., Mineo, C. and Shaul, P. W. (2004). Dissecting the basis of nongenomic activation of eNOS by Estradiol: role of ER{alpha} domains with known nuclear functions. Mol. Endocrinol. 19, 277-289.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cluzel, P., Surette, M. and Leibler, S. (2000). An ultrasensitive bacterial motor revealed by monitoring signaling proteins in single cells. Science 287, 1652-1655.
Evans, S. J., Searcy, B. T. and Moore, F. L. (2000). A subset of kappa opioid ligands bind to the membrane glucocorticoid receptor in an amphibian brain. Endocrinology 141, 2294-2300.
Gametchu, B. (1987). Glucocorticoid receptor-like antigen in lymphoma cell membranes: correlation to cell lysis. Science 236, 456-461.[Medline]
Hafezi-Moghadam, A., Simoncini, T., Yang, E., Limbourg, F. P., Plumier, J. C., Rebsamen, M. C., Hsieh, C. M., Chui, D. S., Thomas, K. L., Prorock, A. J. et al. (2002). Acute cardiovascular protective effects of corticosteroids are mediated by non-transcriptional activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Nat. Med. 8, 473-479.[CrossRef][Medline]
Harrison, R. W., Balasubramanian, K., Yeakley, J., Fant, M., Svec, F. and Fairfield, S. (1979). Heterogeneity of AtT-20 cell glucocorticoid binding sites: evidence for a membrane receptor. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 117, 423-440.[Medline]
Hinz, B. and Hirschelmann, R. (2000). Rapid non-genomic feedback effects of glucocorticoids on CRF-induced ACTH secretion in rats. Pharm. Res. 17, 1273-1277.[CrossRef][Medline]
Köhler, R. H., Schwille, P., Webb, W. W. and Hanson, M. R. (2000). Active protein transport through plastid tubules: velocity quantified by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. J. Cell Sci. 113, 3921-3930.
Korn, K., Gardellin, P., Liao, B., Amacker, M., Bergstrom, A., Bjorkman, H., Camacho, A., Dorhofer, S., Dorre, K., Enstrom, J. et al. (2003). Gene expression analysis using single molecule detection. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, e89.
Kousteni, S., Han, L., Chen, J. R., Almeida, M., Plotkin, L. I., Bellido, T. and Manolagas, S. C. (2003). Kinase-mediated regulation of common transcription factors accounts for the bone-protective effects of sex steroids. J. Clin. Invest. 111, 1651-1664.
Licht, S. S., Sonnleitner, A., Weiss, S. and Schultz, P. G. (2003). A rugged energy landscape mechanism for trapping of transmembrane receptors during endocytosis. Biochemistry 42, 2916-2925.[CrossRef][Medline]
Loechner, K. J., Knox, R. J., McLaughlin, J. T. and Dunlap, K. (1999). Dexamethasone-mediated inhibition of calcium transients and ACTH release in a pituitary cell line (AtT-20). Steroids 64, 404-412.[CrossRef][Medline]
Losel, R. and Wehling, M. (2003). Nongenomic actions of steroid hormones. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 4, 46-56.[CrossRef][Medline]
Losel, R., Falkenstein, E., Feuring, M., Schultz, A., Tillmann, H. C., Rossol-Haserothm, K. and Wehling, M. (2003). Nongenomic steroid action: controversies, questions, and answers. Physiol. Rev. 83, 965-1016.
Magde, D., Elson, E. L. and Webb, W. W. (1972). Thermodynamic fluctuations in a reacting system measurement by Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 705-708.[CrossRef]
Maier, C., Rünzler, D., Wagner, L., Grabner, G., Köhler, G. and Luger, A. (2002). Evidence for specific glucocorticoid binding sites on the cell membrane by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Single Mol. 3, 211-215.[CrossRef]
Mains, R. E., Alam, M. R., Johnson, R. C., Darlington, D. N., Back, N., Hand, T. A. and Eipper, B. A. (1999). Kalirin, a multifunctional PAM COOH-terminal domain interactor protein, affects cytoskeletal organization and ACTH secretion from AtT-20 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 2929-2937.
Maiti, S., Haupts, U. and Webb, W. W. (1997). Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy: diagnostics for sparse molecules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 11753-11757.
Muglia, L. J., Jacobson, L., Luedke, C., Vogt, S. K., Schaefer, M. L., Dikkes, P., Fukuda, S., Sakai, Y., Suda, T. and Majzoub, J. A. (2000). Corticotropin-releasing hormone links pituitary adrenocorticotropin gene expression and release during adrenal insufficiency. J. Clin. Invest. 105, 1269-1277.
Norman, A. W., Mizwicki, M. T. and Norman, D. P. (2004). Steroid-hormone rapid actions, membrane receptors and a conformational ensemble model. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 3, 27-41.[CrossRef][Medline]
Oehlenschlager, F., Schwille, P. and Eigen, M. (1996). Detection of HIV-1 RNA by nucleic acid sequence-based amplification combined with fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 12811-12816.
Papakonstanti, E. A., Kampa, M., Castanas, E. and Stournaras, C. (2003). A rapid, nongenomic, signaling pathway regulates the actin reorganization induced by activation of membrane testosterone receptors. Mol. Endocrinol. 17, 870-881.
Patel, R. C., Kumar, U., Lamb, D. C., Eid, J. S., Rocheville, M., Grant, M., Rani, A., Hazlett, T., Patel, S. C., Gratton, E. et al. (2002). Ligand binding to somatostatin receptors induces receptor-specific oligomer formation in live cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 3294-3299.
Pick, H., Preuss, A. K., Mayer, M., Wohland, T., Hovius, R. and Vogel, H. (2003). Monitoring expression and clustering of the ionotropic 5HT3 receptor in plasma membranes of live biological cells. Biochemistry 42, 877-884.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pitschke, M., Prior, R., Haupt, M. and Riesner, D. (1998). Detection of single amyloid beta-protein aggregates in the cerebrospinal fluid of Alzheimer's patients by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Nat. Med. 4, 832-834.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pramanik, A., Olsson, M., Lange, U., Bartfai, T. and Rigler, R. (2001). Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy detects galanin receptor diversity on insulinoma cells. Biochemistry 40, 10839-10845.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rigler, R., Pramanik, A., Jonasson, P., Kratz, G., Jansson, O. T., Nygren, P., Stahl, S., Ekberg, K., Johansson, B., Uhlen, S. et al. (1999). Specific binding of proinsulin C-peptide to human cell membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 13318-13323.
Schaaf, M. J. and Cidlowski, J. A. (2003). Molecular determinants of glucocorticoid receptor mobility in living cells: the importance of ligand affinity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 1922-1934.
Schwille, P., Haupts, U., Maiti, S. and Webb, W. W. (1999a). Molecular dynamics in living cells observed by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy with one- and two-photon excitation. Biophys. J. 77, 2251-2265.
Schwille, P., Korlach, J. and Webb, W. W. (1999b). Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy with single-molecule sensitivity on cell and model membranes. Cytometry 36, 176-182.[CrossRef][Medline]
Shakil, T., Ehsanul-Hoque, A. N., Husain, M. and Belsham, D. D. (2002). Differential regulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion and gene expression by androgen: membrane versus nuclear receptor activation. Mol. Endocrinol. 16, 2592-2602.
Simoncini, T., Hafezi-Moghadam, A., Brazil, D. P., Ley, K., Chin, W. W. and Liao, J. K. (2000). Interaction of oestrogen receptor with the regulatory subunit of phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase. Nature 407, 538-541.[CrossRef][Medline]
Song, R. X., Barnes, C. J., Zhang, Z., Bao, Y., Kumar, R. and Santen, R. J. (2004). The role of Shc and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor in mediating the translocation of estrogen receptor alpha to the plasma membrane. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 2076-2081.
Spindler, K. D., Krahwinkel, R., Kolb-Bachofen, V. and Schlepper-Schafer, J. (1991). Electron microscopic demonstration of glucocorticoid recognition sites on isolated rat hepatocytes. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 39, 315-322.[CrossRef][Medline]
Watson, C. S. and Gametchu, B. (2001). Membrane estrogen and glucocorticoid receptorsimplications for hormonal control of immune function and autoimmunity. Int. Immunopharmacol. 1, 1049-1063.[CrossRef][Medline]
Watson, C. S., Campbell, C. H. and Gametchu, B. (2002). The dynamic and elusive membrane estrogen receptor-alpha. Steroids 67, 429-437.[CrossRef][Medline]
Winter, C., Schulz, N., Giebisch, G., Geibel, J. P. and Wagner, C. A. (2004). Nongenomic stimulation of vacuolar H+-ATPases in intercalated renal tubule cells by aldosterone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 2636-2641.
Yakovleva, T., Pramanik, A., Kawasaki, T., Tan-No, K., Gileva, I., Lindegren, H., Langel, U., Ekstrom, T. J., Rigler, R., Terenius, L. et al. (2001). p53 Latency. C-terminal domain prevents binding of p53 core to target but not to nonspecific DNA sequences. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 15650-15658.
Zhong, Z. H., Pramanik, A., Ekberg, K., Jansson, O. T., Jornvall, H., Wahren, J. and Rigler, R. (2001). Insulin binding monitored by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Diabetologia 44, 1184-1188.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zhu, Y., Bond, J. and Thomas, P. (2003a). Identification, classification, and partial characterization of genes in humans and other vertebrates homologous to a fish membrane progestin receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 2237-2242.
Zhu, Y., Rice, C. D., Pang, Y., Pace, M. and Thomas, P. (2003b). Cloning, expression, and characterization of a membrane progestin receptor and evidence it is an intermediary in meiotic maturation of fish oocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 2231-2236.