1 Animal Genomics, AgResearch, Private Bag 3123, East Street, Hamilton, New Zealand
2 School of Biological Sciences, University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, New Zealand
Author for correspondence (e-mail: ravi.kambadur{at}agresearch.co.nz)
Accepted 10 May 2005
![]() |
Summary |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Myostatin, Satellite cell, Muscle regeneration, Fibrosis, Decorin, Macrophages
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Muscle injury triggers a sequence of events that begin with a host inflammatory response followed by muscle fiber regeneration and collagen synthesis (Bischoff and Heintz, 1994). Injured muscle is infiltrated by inflammatory cells; neutrophils increase substantially in number 1-6 hours after an injury and then decline rapidly; whereas macrophages constitute the largest cell population at 12 hours post-injury (Tidball, 1995
). The major role of macrophages appears to be phagocytosis of muscle debris. However, recent studies have demonstrated a direct role for macrophages during the early events of skeletal muscle regeneration (Merly et al., 1999
). A transplantation model showed that stimulation of macrophage infiltration resulted in earlier activation of SCs, demonstrating that macrophages indeed play a direct role in muscle regeneration (Lescaudron et al., 1997
; Lescaudron et al., 1993
).
In addition to inflammatory cell migration, myoblasts derived from SCs are also shown to migrate during muscle regeneration (Moens et al., 1996; Watt et al., 1987
). Following muscle trauma, there is abundant evidence for the direct migration of myoblasts from the necrotic area towards the periphery (Schultz et al., 1988
). Later, during regeneration, they migrate back to the center, where they undergo myogenesis (Phillips et al., 1987
). Localized muscle trauma apparently produces factors that stimulate chemotaxis of myoblasts from distant sites (Watt et al., 1994
). Thus far, the nature of the signals that direct the migration of muscle precursor cells during skeletal muscle regeneration has remained largely unknown.
Several different growth factors, including hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF), have been shown to affect muscle regeneration positively by regulating SC activation (Floss et al., 1997; Miller et al., 2000
). However, myostatin (Mstn; also known as growth differentiation factor 8, Gdf8), a secreted transforming growth factor ß (TGF-ß) superfamily member, is a potent negative regulator of myogenesis (McPherron et al., 1997
). Recent results from our laboratory and others suggest that Mstn is a potent regulator of cell-cycle progression and functions by regulating both the proliferation and differentiation steps of myogenesis (Langley et al., 2002
; Thomas et al., 2000
). Several studies have demonstrated a role for Mstn not only during embryonic myogenesis, but also in postnatal muscle growth. Studies by Wehling et al. (Wehling et al., 2000
) and Carlson et al. (Carlson et al., 1999
) indicated that atrophy-related muscle loss as a result of hind-limb suspension in mice was associated with increased Mstn levels in musculus plantaris. Increased Mstn levels were also associated with severe muscle wasting seen in HIV patients (Gonzalez-Cadavid et al., 1998
). One explanation for the elevated levels of Mstn observed during muscle disuse is that Mstn might function as an inhibitor of SC activation or proliferation. Indeed, this is supported by recent results from our laboratory that show a lack of Mstn results in an increased pool of activated SC in vivo and enhanced self-renewal of SCs (McCroskery et al., 2003
). Since SC activation plays a crucial role in muscle regeneration, we wanted to assess the role of Mstn in this process. Here we show that, consistent with its role in SC quiescence, Mstn negatively regulates muscle regeneration. Thus, lack of Mstn results in accelerated regeneration and reduced fibrosis.
![]() |
Materials and Methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
SC proliferation ex vivo
Single muscle fibers were isolated from 4-week-old wild-type mice (n=3) and cultured using the published method (Rosenblatt et al., 1995). Briefly, the tibialis anterior muscle was excised and incubated in 0.2% collagenase type 1A (Sigma) in DMEM (without serum) at 37°C, with constant shaking (70 rpm) for 60-90 minutes. The whole muscle was gently triturated and isolated fibers were transferred to 24-well plates coated with 10% (v/v) matrigel (Becton Dickinson). Fibers were left to attach for 3 minutes, then 500 µl of fiber media [FM; DMEM, 10% (v/v) horse serum (HS), 0.5% (v/v) chick embryo extract (CEE), (penicillin/streptomycin)] or FM with increasing amounts of recombinant Mstn (Thomas et al., 2000
) was added. Purification of recombinant Mstn from Escherichia coli is described elsewhere (Thomas et al., 2000
). Cells were left to migrate off the fibers for 72 hours at 37°C/5% CO2. The number of migrated SCs in each well was counted under an inverted microscope. Replicates of at least 30 single fibers were used for statistical analysis. Differences between groups were analyzed by a generalized linear model with binomial distribution using GenStat6.
Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation in activated SCs on fibers
The muscle fibers were isolated from 4-week-old wild-type mice (n=6) by the method described above, and were allowed to attach to 10% matrigel-coated 4-well Lab-Tek® chamber slides. FM media including 10 µM BrdU with or without increasing concentrations of Mstn was added to the wells, and fibers were incubated for 48 hours. In the rescue experiment, isolated fibers were cultured in FM containing 1 µg/ml Mstn for 24 hours and then half was gently washed and changed to FM, whereas the other half was left in the media with recombinant Mstn for a further 24 hours. Fibers were fixed with Carnoys fixative overnight at -20°C. BrdU incorporation and detection was carried out using the Roche (Roche Diagnostics Corporation International) cell proliferation kit 1 protocol. Staining with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) was used to visualize all myonuclei. BrdU-positive nuclei on the fibers (n=30) were counted and the number of BrdU-positive nuclei per 100 DAPI-positive nuclei was calculated. Differences between groups were analyzed by a generalized linear model with Poisson distribution using GenStat6.
Muscle injury
6-8-week-old male C57BL/10 and Mstn-/- mice (n=27 per group) were anaesthetized using a mixture of 25% Hypnorm (Fentanyl citrate 0.315 mg/ml and Fluanisone 10 mg/ml) and 10% Hypnovel (Midazolam at 5 mg/ml) at 0.1 ml/10g body weight. The tibialis anterior muscle of the right leg was injected intramuscularly with 10 µl of 10 µg/ml notexin, using a 100 µl syringe (SGE, Australia). Tibialis anterior muscles were removed from euthanized mice at day 0 (control), and days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14 or 28 (n=3 per day). The tibialis anterior muscles were mounted in Tissue Tec and frozen in isopentane chilled in liquid nitrogen. Frozen muscle samples were stored at -80°C. Seven µm transverse sections (n=3) were cut at three levels, 100 µm apart. The sections were then stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Sections were then examined and photographed using an Olympus BX50 microscope (Olympus Optical) fitted with a DAGE-MTI DC-330 color camera (DAGE-MTI).
Indirect immunofluorescence
Frozen muscle sections (7 µm thick) were post-fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde and then permeabilized in 0.3% (v/v) Triton X-100 in PBS and then blocked with 10% (v/v) normal goat serum Tris-buffered saline (NGS-TBS) for 1 hour at RT. The sections were incubated with antibodies diluted in 5% NGS-TBS overnight at 4°C. The antibodies used were mouse anti-Myod1, 1:25 dilution (554130; PharMingen), which is a specific marker for activated myoblasts (Cooper et al., 1999; Koishi et al., 1995
); and goat anti-Mac-1, 1:400 dilution (Integrin M-19; Santa Cruz), which is an antibody specific for infiltrating peripheral macrophages (Springer et al., 1979
). The sections were washed three times with PBS, and were then incubated with either donkey anti-mouse Cy3 conjugate, 1:400 dilution (715-165-150; Jackson ImmunoResearch) or biotinylated donkey anti-sheep/goat-IgG antibody 1:400 dilution (RPN 1025; Amersham). Secondary antibody incubation was followed by incubation with streptavidin conjugated to fluorescein, 1:400 dilution (S-869; Molecular Probes) diluted in 5% NGS-TBS for 30 minutes at RT. Sections were rinsed three times with PBS, counter stained with DAPI and mounted with Dako® fluorescent mounting medium. Tibialis anterior muscle sections were examined by epi-fluorescent microscopy. Representative micrographs were taken on an Olympus BX50 microscope fitted with a DAGE-MTI DC-330 color camera. The average muscle area was measured using the Scion Imaging program (NIH) with five random muscle sections used previously for immunohistochemistry from Mstn-/- and wild-type mice.
Scanning electron microscopy
The muscle samples were cleaned of fat and tendons, and were fixed in 10 ml of 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde for 48 hours with gentle rocking. The glutaraldehyde was washed off in PBS for 1 hour, before being transferred to 50 ml of 2 M NaOH, and incubated for 5 days at a constant 25°C. Samples were then washed in PBS, and transferred to 50 ml of sterile distilled water. Muscles were kept at a constant 25°C for an additional four days. For the first 36 hours, the water was changed every 12 hours, then every 24 hours thereafter. The muscles were then transferred to 1% tanic acid for 2 hours, and then washed three times in PBS. Muscle was treated with 1% OsO4 for 2 hours followed by dehydration by emersion three times for 15 minutes each into an ascending gradient of ethanol (50-100%). Muscle samples were dried using carbon dioxide and coated with gold. Specimens were examined and photographed using a scanning electron microscope (HITACHI 4100) with an accelerating voltage of 10 kV.
Chemotaxis of SCs and macrophages
Primary myoblasts were cultured from the hind-limb muscle of 4-6-week-old mice, according to the published protocols (Allen et al., 1997; Partridge, 1997
). Briefly, muscles were minced and then digested in 0.2% collagenase type 1A for 90 minutes. Cultures were enriched for myoblasts by pre-plating on uncoated plates for 3 hours. Myoblast cultures were maintained in growth media (GM) supplemented with 20% fetal calf serum (FCS), 10% HS and 1% CEE on 10% matrigel-coated plates, at 37°C/5% CO2. The extent of culture purity was assessed by flow cytometry analysis of Myod1 expression after 48 hours in culture. Cells were harvested using trypsin, suspended at a concentration of 106 cells/200 µl and fixed overnight in 5 ml 70% ethanol at -20°C. Staining was performed for 30 minutes at RT using rabbit polyclonal anti-Myod1, 1:200 (Santa Cruz), followed by Alexa fluor 488 anti-rabbit conjugate, 1:500 (Molecular Probes). Analysis was carried out in duplicate with 104 cell events collected in each assay. Debris was excluded by gating on forward and side scatter profiles. Cells were analyzed by FACScan (Becton Dickinson). Macrophages were isolated by a peritoneal lavage technique. Zymosan-activated mouse serum (ZAMS) was prepared according to the published protocol (Colditz and Movat, 1984
). Chemotaxis experiments were performed in single blind-well Boyden-type chambers with 7 mm diameter wells (Neuro Probe). Standard polycarbonate filters with 8 µm holes (Neuro Probe; holes=6% of surface area) were washed thoroughly and, for the myoblast assay, filters were treated with 1% Matrigel in DMEM for 30 minutes. Filters were then dried and placed between the top and bottom chambers.
For the chemotaxis assay of myoblasts, the individual bottom well was filled with test or control media as follows: (i) DMEM + 0.25% BSA as negative control; (ii) DMEM + 0.25% BSA + 5% CEE as positive control; (iii) DMEM + 0.25% BSA + 5% CEE + 5 µg/ml recombinant Mstn; (iv) DMEM + 0.25% BSA + 5 µg/ml recombinant Mstn. The top wells were filled with a suspension of myoblasts (75,000) in carrier media (DMEM + 0.25% BSA).
Similarly, for chemotaxis assays with macrophages, the bottom well was filled with the following test or control media: (1) inactivated mouse serum as negative control; (2) ZAMS as positive control; (3) ZAMS + 5 µg/ml recombinant Mstn; (4) inactivated mouse serum + 5 µg/ml recombinant Mstn. The top wells were filled with a suspension of macrophages (75,000) in carrier medium.
The blind-well chambers were incubated at 37°C/95% air/5% CO2. After allowing for migration of the cells, 7 hours for SC and 4 hours for the macrophages, the filters were removed and washed with sterile pre-wet swabs to remove cells from the top of the filter. The filter was then fixed in ethanol: formalin: acetic acid (20:2:1), stained with hematoxylin, and wet mounted on slides. Migrated cells fallen from the lower surface of the filter were monitored by examining medium from the bottom chamber in a hemocytometer. Migrated cells were counted using an ocular grid.
Quantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA was isolated using Trizol (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Reverse transcription reaction was performed using Superscript preamplification kit (Invitrogen). The primers used in the PCR are given in Table 1. PCR was performed with 1 µl of the reverse transcription reaction, at 94°C for 30 seconds, 55°C for 30 seconds and 72°C for 30 seconds. For each gene, the number of cycles required for exponential amplification was determined using varying cycles. The amplicons were separated on an agarose gel and transferred to a nylon membrane. The PCR products were detected by Southern blot hybridization. Each data point was normalized by the abundance of glyceraldhyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA.
|
HGF-mediated repression of the Mstn promoter
C2C12 myoblasts stably transfected with the 1.6 kb Mstn promoter-luciferase construct (Spiller et al., 2002) were plated into 6-well dishes (Nunc) at a concentration of 15,000 cells/cm2. After a 16-hour attachment period, media was changed to DMEM/10% FBS containing either 20 ng/ml of recombinant human HGF (R & D Systems), or vehicle (PBS/0.1% BSA; Sigma). Cultures were then incubated at 37°C/5% CO2 for 24 hours and cell lysates were made using 1x lysis buffer (Promega) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Luciferase activity was assayed using the luciferase reporter assay kit (Promega), and the values normalized to ß-galactosidase activity. Data is presented as the mean±s.e.m. of three replicates per treatment.
Statistics
To determine differences between two groups, comparisons were made using Student's t-test. To compare differences between groups, the data was analyzed using ANOVA. Data is presented as means±s.e.m.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
Histology of early events during muscle regeneration
Since Mstn is expressed in SCs (McCroskery et al., 2003) and negatively regulates SC proliferation, we reasoned that Mstn might play a role in muscle regeneration. To investigate muscle regeneration in wild-type and Mstn-/- mice, the tibialis anterior muscle was injured using the snake venom notexin. Notexin-treated mice were euthanized and samples were taken at days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14 and 28 (n=3/time point). Control uninjured muscle sections derived from both wild-type and Mstn-/- mice were identical, except the cross-sectional fiber area in the Mstn-/- muscle was approximately 10% larger in size (Fig. 2A). Notexin injection caused damage to greater than 90% of the tibialis anterior muscle in both wild-type and Mstn-/- mice. One day after injury, there was a loss of normal structure in the muscle of wild-type and Mstn-/- mice, which is indicative of necrosis (Fig. 2B). Myofibers contained eosinophilic cytoplasm and some cells showed fine intracellular vacuolation. There was an increase in the intercellular spacing with marked myofiber disruption (Fig. 2C). Although Mstn-/- muscle has more muscle mass, the extent of muscle damage as a result of notexin treatment appears to be similar between wild-type and Mstn-/- mice.
|
|
Early expression of myogenic genes in regenerating Mstn-/- muscle
Grounds et al. (Grounds et al., 1992) demonstrated that Myod1 and myogenin (Myog) gene expression can be used as markers for the very early detection of migrating myoblasts during muscle regeneration. Hence, we determined the expression of Myod1 and Myog in the regenerating tissue. Quantitative RT-PCR results confirm that the expression of the muscle regulatory factors Myod1 and Myog were expressed earlier in Mstn-/- muscle as compared with wild-type muscle. High levels of Myod1 mRNA were detected within 12 hours after injury in the Mstn-/- muscle. However, in the wild-type muscle, Myod1 expression was undetectable until day 1 of injury (Fig. 3E). Similarly, higher levels of mRNA for Myog was also detected very early, within 12 hours after injury in the regenerating Mstn-/- muscle. However, in the wild-type regenerating muscle, Myog mRNA was not detected until one day after the muscle injury (Fig. 3E). Thus, results from immunohistochemistry and gene expression analysis concur that there is increased and hastened migration of myogenic cells to the site of injury in Mstn-/- muscle.
Mstn inhibits chemotaxis of myoblasts and macrophages
Results presented above indicate that Mstn-/- muscle has an increased infiltration of macrophages and migration of myoblasts to the area of regeneration. Since both cell types are influenced by chemotactic factors to direct their movement (Bischoff, 1997; Jones, 2000
), we investigated the effect of Mstn on the migratory ability of SC-derived myoblasts and macrophages. To test whether Mstn interferes with chemotactic signals, blind-well chemotaxis chambers were used. Isolated myoblasts or macrophages were assessed for their migratory ability through a filter towards a chemoattractant (CEE for myoblasts, and ZAMS-activated serum for macrophages). The isolated myoblasts were found to be 90% myogenic (Myod1+) as assessed by flow cytometry. As can be seen in Fig. 4A, there was a threefold increase in the number of myoblasts crossing the filter when a positive attractant was present. When recombinant Mstn was added with the positive attractant, there was a 50% reduction in the migration. The inhibition by Mstn on the migration of myoblasts across the membrane was significant (P<0.01; Fig. 4A). Mstn in negative control media did not inhibit the chemokinesis of myoblasts. In the presence of ZAMS, 300% more macrophages crossed the filter compared with the negative control. However, when 5 µg/ml recombinant Mstn was added with the ZAMS, there was a 50% reduction in the net migration across the filter. The inhibition by Mstn on macrophages was significant (P<0.01; Fig. 4B).
|
Reduced scar tissue is observed in Mstn-/- mice
In skeletal muscle, the development of fibrosis begins two weeks after notexin injury and continues over time (Sato et al., 2003). To assess the role of Mstn in fibrosis, histology of both muscle genotypes were compared. At day 28, scar tissue was observed in sections of wild-type muscle stained with hematoxylin and eosin, whereas very little was seen in the Mstn-/- muscle sections (Fig. 5A). The presence of connective tissue was further confirmed using Van Giesen's stain (Fig. 5A). Wild-type muscle sections at day 28 had larger areas of collagen, therefore more scar tissue was seen in the wild-type tissue as compared with the Mstn-/- muscle. To confirm this result further, regenerated muscle was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy. Scanning electron micrographs of day 0 (control) and day 24 regenerated muscle showed the connective tissue framework surrounding the spaces once occupied by the myofibers (Fig. 5A). Neither wild-type nor Mstn-/- muscle had thickened connective tissue around the fiber cavity in the control (not injured) samples. However, by day 24 of regeneration, dense bundles of connective tissue were observed in the wild-type muscle (Fig. 5A), but not in the Mstn-/- muscle.
|
Regenerating Mstn-/- muscle have reduced decorin expression
TGF-ß has been shown to stimulate the deposition of collagens and overgrowth of the extracellular matrix, thereby leading to the accumulation of fibrotic tissue (Roberts et al., 1986). Thus, the reduced scarring seen in the Mstn-/- regenerated muscle could be a result of decreased expression or activity of TGF-ß. Since there was no change observed in the expression levels of TGF-ß in the Mstn-/- mice (results not shown), we monitored the expression levels of decorin, a known anti-TGF-ß proteoglycan (Isaka et al., 1996
), in the wild-type and Mstn-/- regenerating muscle. The quantification results (Fig. 5B) indeed suggest that Mstn negatively regulates decorin mRNA expression.
HGF downregulates Mstn expression
HGF is a positive regulator of SC activation and muscle regeneration (Miller et al., 2000). One possible mechanism behind HGF action could be through downregulating the expression of a negative regulator such as Mstn. Thus, to investigate the possible interactions between positive and negative regulators of muscle regeneration, the gene expression profile of Mstn and Hgf was compared in wild-type and Mstn-/- regenerating muscle. In wild-type regenerating muscle, the expression of Hgf was first detected by day 2, the same time when Mstn expression decreases to almost undetectable levels (Fig. 6A). Similarly, Mstn expression levels peak (day 1) at the time when Hgf expression is undetectable (Fig. 6A). The mutually exclusive expression profile of Hgf and Mstn thus indicate that Hgf might be a repressor of Mstn expression. To test this, we treated stable cells harboring a Mstn promoter-reporter (Spiller et al., 2002
) construct with HGF protein and observed that the reporter activity of the Mstn promoter decreased by 90%, confirming that Hgf is an inhibitor of Mstn expression (Fig. 6B).
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Mstn and SC proliferation
Mstn is a negative regulator of myogenesis and research into the molecular mechanism of Mstn function has revealed that Mstn is a potent regulator of cell-cycle progression (Thomas et al., 2000). Since activation of SCs requires re-entry into the cell cycle, we assessed the direct effect of Mstn on SC proliferation. In an ex vivo culture system, recombinant Mstn not only inhibited the proliferation of SCs attached to the muscle fiber, it also inhibited the migration of SCs from the fiber (Fig. 1). However, removal of Mstn reverses the effect and results in the proliferation of SCs attached to the fiber. This clearly demonstrates that Mstn directly inhibits SC proliferation. Mstn is a secreted factor that is predominately synthesized in muscle (Thomas et al., 2000
). Thus, Mstn can elicit its effect on SC proliferation in a paracrine, endocrine or autocrine fashion. Recently, Zimmers et al. (Zimmers et al., 2002
) convincingly showed that Mstn is a potent inducer of muscle wasting when administered systemically, suggesting that although Mstn is synthesized by the muscle fiber and SCs, the possible mode of action of Mstn in SC quiescence and proliferation could be endocrine in nature.
Mstn and skeletal muscle regeneration
Previous results demonstrated that Mstn-/- mice have more SCs per fiber and increased numbers of activated SCs (McCroskery et al., 2003). Therefore, it was hypothesized that Mstn has a role in the maintenance of the quiescence of SCs. Since the activation of quiescent SCs plays a pivotal role in skeletal muscle regeneration, it was also hypothesized that Mstn could have a negative effect on muscle regeneration. Thus, to address the role of Mstn in regeneration, muscle injury was induced and regeneration was evaluated in wild-type and Mstn-/- mice. One day after notexin-induced injury, extensive fiber necrosis was observed. Over 90% of the muscle was affected by the notexin treatment in both wild-type and Mstn-/- mice (Fig. 2). This result indicates that the increased musculature in Mstn-/- mice did not influence the efficacy of notexin. Immunohistochemical analysis of the regenerating muscle after injury in wild-type and Mstn-/- mice revealed that there are two major changes in the regenerative capacity of Mstn-/- mice. First, there is increased infiltration of nuclei into the regenerating area of the tibialis anterior muscle of Mstn-/- mice, compared with the wild-type mice (Fig. 2). Second, in the Mstn-/- mice, a majority of the muscle fibers lost are replaced by new muscle fibers and, to a lesser extent, by connective tissue (Fig. 5). Thus, these results suggest that Mstn could potentially have a role in the migration of inflammatory cells/myoblasts to the site of injury and myoblast proliferation and differentiation. In injured muscle, the damaged myofibers undergo necrosis. Subsequently, the necrotic area is invaded by small blood vessels, mononuclear cells and activated macrophages. These activated lymphocytes simultaneously secrete several cytokines and growth factors, which perform a wide range of functions in the inflammation process. More importantly, the release of growth factors at the injured site also regulates myoblast migration, proliferation and differentiation to promote muscle regeneration and repair (Moens et al., 1996
). Immunocytochemistry performed on muscle sections from both wild-type and Mstn-/- mice demonstrates that, in the absence of Mstn, twice the number of myogenic cells (Myod1+) and macrophages (Mac-1+) are present at the site of regeneration (Figs 2 and 3). The increased accretion of myoblasts at the site of injury in Mstn-/- mice could be as a result of a higher number of SCs (per unit fiber) present in the Mstn-/- mice and enhanced proliferation of Mstn-/- myoblasts derived from the SCs (McCroskery et al., 2003
). In turn, this increase in the SC population could be from enhanced self-renewal of SCs (McCroskery et al., 2003
). Alternatively, it could also be a result of increased macrophage migration since it was previously shown that macrophages can influence myoblast migration (Merly et al., 1999
). The evidence presented here suggests that both these factors might be contributing. Thus, when the muscle is injured, lack of Mstn could lead to the increased activation and thus higher accretion of myoblasts in the Mstn-/- muscle. Also, chemotaxis assays (Fig. 4) indicate that Mstn acts as an anti-chemotaxis agent for macrophages and myoblasts. Thus, lack of Mstn could lead to increased migration of macrophages and SCs.
In skeletal muscle, the development of fibrosis begins two weeks after notexin injury and continues over time (Sato et al., 2003). To assess the role of Mstn in fibrosis, histology of both muscle genotypes were compared. At day 28, scar tissue was observed in sections of wild-type muscle stained with hematoxylin and eosin, whereas very little scar tissue was seen in the Mstn-/- muscle sections (Fig. 5A). Reduced connective tissue was further confirmed by Van Geisen's stain and scanning electron microscopy. TGF-ß has been shown to stimulate the deposition of collagen and overgrowth of the extracellular matrix, thereby leading to the accumulation of fibrotic tissue (Roberts et al., 1986
). Thus, the reduced scarring seen in the Mstn-/- regenerated muscle could be a result of decreased expression or activity of TGF-ß. Since there was no change observed in the expression levels of TGF-ß in the Mstn-/- mice (results not shown), we monitored the expression levels of decorin mRNA, a known anti-TGF-ß proteoglycan (Isaka et al., 1996
), in the wild-type and Mstn-/- regenerating muscle. The quantification results indeed suggest that Mstn negatively regulates decorin mRNA expression (Fig. 5B). Thus, we propose a mechanism that increased decorin mRNA expression in Mstn-/- will sequester the TGF-ß latency complex (Isaka et al., 1996
) and reduce scar tissue formation. The connective tissue in the muscle is mainly composed of collagen. Infiltrating fibroblasts during muscle growth and regeneration are mainly responsible for the secretion of the collagen. Thus, the observed reduction in the connective tissue in the regenerated muscle of Mstn-/- mice could also be due to fewer fibroblasts at the site of regeneration. Indeed, the quantification of migrated cells at the site of injury does suggest that, in the Mstn-/- mice, there is an increase in the proportion of Myod1+ replicating cells, inferring that there is a proportionate reduction in the number of non-myogenic fibroblasts at the site. Thus, the increased number of Myod1+ myogenic precursor cells at the regenerating site in the Mstn-/- mice could be out-competing the reduced number of fibroblasts and hence replacing the connective tissue within the muscle fiber.
This study provides evidence that Mstn acts to maintain the SC quiescence. The increased activation of SCs, and fusion of an increased number of myonuclei as a result, could explain the molecular mechanism behind the hypertrophy seen in the Mstn-/- mice. Also, we demonstrate that there is enhanced and complete muscle healing in the Mstn-/- mice after injury. The mechanism behind the complete healing in Mstn-/- mice appears to be the increased activation of SCs, enhanced migration of macrophages and myoblasts, and decreased fibrosis. In this respect, Mstn appears to be a unique growth factor that can negatively regulate two crucial steps of muscle regeneration SC activation and the inflammatory response (Fig. 7). From the pharmacological point of view, antagonizing Mstn should be a viable drug option for muscle growth in muscular dystrophy (Bogdanovich et al., 2002), sarcopenia and cachexia (Zimmers et al., 2002
). Additional experiments with `mimetics', antagonists or a vaccine against Mstn (Bogdanovich et al., 2002
) should be tested in a clinical setting to evaluate the efficacy of such therapies.
|
If lack of Mstn is beneficial in terms of increased muscle growth and healing then why did nature select for Mstn? According to the Chalone hypothesis, organ size is maintained by specific negative regulators (chalones) that are produced by a given tissue (Bullough, 1965). Thus, Mstn could be the `chalone' for muscle size maintenance after regeneration: the positive regulators (Hgf) overcome the blocking effect of such chalones by downregulating the expression of Mstn to stimulate regeneration. Thus, the net result of `push and pull' between positive and negative regulators would determine growth and regeneration.
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
![]() |
Footnotes |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Allen, R. E., Temm-Grove, C. J., Sheehan, S. M. and Rice, G. (1997). Skeletal muscle satellite cell cultures. Methods Cell Biol. 52, 155-176.[Medline]
Anderson, J. E. (1998). Murray L. Barr Award Lecture. Studies of the dynamics of skeletal muscle regeneration: the mouse came back! Biochem. Cell Biol. 76, 13-26.[CrossRef][Medline]
Beauchamp, J. R., Heslop, L., Yu, D. S., Tajbakhsh, S., Kelly, R. G., Wernig, A., Buckingham, M. E., Partridge, T. A. and Zammit, P. S. (2000). Expression of CD34 and Myf5 defines the majority of quiescent adult skeletal muscle satellite cells. J. Cell Biol. 151, 1221-1234.
Bischoff, R. (1994). The satellite cell and muscle regeneration. In Myology, Vol. 1 (ed. A. G. Engel and C. Franzini-Armstrong), pp. 97-118. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional.
Bischoff, R. (1997). Chemotaxis of skeletal muscle satellite cells. Dev. Dyn. 208, 505-515.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bischoff, R. and Heintz, C. (1994). Enhancement of skeletal muscle regeneration. Dev. Dyn. 201, 41-54.[Medline]
Bogdanovich, S., Krag, T. O., Barton, E. R., Morris, L. D., Whittemore, L. A., Ahima, R. S. and Khurana, T. S. (2002). Functional improvement of dystrophic muscle by myostatin blockade. Nature 420, 418-421.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bullough, W. S. (1965). Mitotic and functional homeostasis: a speculative review. Cancer Res. 25, 1683-1727.[Medline]
Carlson, C. J., Booth, F. W. and Gordon, S. E. (1999). Skeletal muscle myostatin mRNA expression is fiber-type specific and increases during hindlimb unloading. Am. J. Physiol. 277, R601-R606.[Medline]
Colditz, I. G. and Movat, H. Z. (1984). Kinetics of neutrophil accumulation in acute inflammatory lesions induced by chemotaxins and chemotaxinigens. J. Immunol. 133, 2169-2173.
Conboy, I. M. and Rando, T. A. (2002). The regulation of notch signaling controls satellite cell activation and cell fate determination in postnatal myogenesis. Dev. Cell 3, 397-409.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cooper, R. N., Tajbakhsh, S., Mouly, V., Cossu, G., Buckingham, M. and Butler-Browne, G. S. (1999). In vivo satellite cell activation via Myf5 and MyoD in regenerating mouse skeletal muscle. J. Cell Sci. 112, 2895-2901.
Floss, T., Arnold, H. H. and Braun, T. (1997). A role for FGF-6 in skeletal muscle regeneration. Genes Dev. 11, 2040-2051.
Gonzalez-Cadavid, N. F., Taylor, W. E., Yarasheski, K., Sinha-Hikim, I., Ma, K., Ezzat, S., Shen, R., Lalani, R., Asa, S., Mamita, M. et al. (1998). Organization of the human myostatin gene and expression in healthy men and HIV-infected men with muscle wasting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 14938-14943.
Grounds, M. D. and Yablonka-Reuveni, Z. (1993). Molecular and cell biology of skeletal muscle regeneration. Mol. Cell Biol. Hum. Dis. Ser. 3, 210-256.[Medline]
Grounds, M. D., Garrett, K. L. and Beilharz, M. W. (1992). The transcription of MyoD1 and myogenin genes in thymic cells in vivo. Exp. Cell Res. 198, 357-361.[CrossRef][Medline]
Huard, J., Li, Y. and Fu, F. H. (2002). Muscle injuries and repair: current trends in research. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 84, 822-832.
Isaka, Y., Brees, D. K., Ikegaya, K., Kaneda, Y., Imai, E., Noble, N. A. and Border, W. A. (1996). Gene therapy by skeletal muscle expression of decorin prevents fibrotic disease in rat kidney. Nat. Med. 2, 418-423.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jones, G. E. (2000). Cellular signaling in macrophage migration and chemotaxis. J. Leukocyte Biol. 68, 593-602.
Kawakami, K., Teruya, K., Tohyama, M., Kudeken, N., Yonamine, Y. and Saito, A. (1995). Mac1 discriminates unusual CD4-CD8- double-negative T cells bearing alpha beta antigen receptor from conventional ones with either CD4 or CD8 in murine lung. Immunol. Lett. 46, 143-152.[CrossRef][Medline]
Koishi, K., Zhang, M., McLennan, I. S. and Harris, A. J. (1995). MyoD protein accumulates in satellite cells and is neurally regulated in regenerating myotubes and skeletal muscle fibers. Dev. Dyn. 202, 244-254.[Medline]
Langley, B., Thomas, M., Bishop, A., Sharma, M., Gilmour, S. and Kambadur, R. (2002). Myostatin inhibits myoblast differentiation by down-regulating MyoD Expression. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 49831-49840.
Lescaudron, L., Li, Z., Paulin, D. and Fontaine-Perus, J. (1993). Desmin-lacZ transgene, a marker of regenerating skeletal muscle. Neuromuscular Disord. 3, 419-422.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lescaudron, L., Creuzet, S. E., Li, Z., Paulin, D. and Fontaine-Perus, J. (1997). Desmin-lacZ transgene expression and regeneration within skeletal muscle transplants. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 18, 631-641.[CrossRef][Medline]
McCroskery, S., Thomas, M., Maxwell, L., Sharma, M. and Kambadur, R. (2003). Myostatin negatively regulates satellite cell activation and self-renewal. J. Cell Biol. 162, 1135-1147.
McPherron, A. C., Lawler, A. M. and Lee, S. J. (1997). Regulation of skeletal muscle mass in mice by a new TGF-beta superfamily member. Nature 387, 83-90.[CrossRef][Medline]
Merly, F., Lescaudron, L., Rouaud, T., Crossin, F. and Gardahaut, M. F. (1999). Macrophages enhance muscle satellite cell proliferation and delay their differentiation. Muscle Nerve 22, 724-732.[CrossRef][Medline]
Miller, K. J., Thaloor, D., Matteson, S. and Pavlath, G. K. (2000). Hepatocyte growth factor affects satellite cell activation and differentiation in regenerating skeletal muscle. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 278, C174-C181.
Moens, P. D., Van-Schoor, M. C. and Marechal, G. (1996). Lack of myoblasts migration between transplanted and host muscles of mdx and normal mice. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 17, 37-43.[CrossRef][Medline]
Partridge, T. A. (1997). Tissue culture of skeletal muscle. Methods. Mol. Biol. 75, 131-144.[Medline]
Phillips, G. D., Lu, D. Y., Mitashov, V. I. and Carlson, B. M. (1987). Survival of myogenic cells in freely grafted rat rectus femoris and extensor digitorum longus muscles. Am. J. Anat. 180, 365-372.[CrossRef][Medline]
Roberts, A. B., Sporn, M. B., Assoian, R. K., Smith, J. M., Roche, N. S., Wakefield, L. M., Heine, U. I., Liotta, L. A., Falanga, V., Kehrl, J. H. et al. (1986). Transforming growth factor type beta: rapid induction of fibrosis and angiogenesis in vivo and stimulation of collagen formation in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 4167-4171.
Rosenblatt, J. D., Lunt, A. I., Parry, D. J. and Partridge, T. A. (1995). Culturing satellite cells from living single muscle fiber explants. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. 31, 773-779.
Sato, K., Li, Y., Foster, W., Fukushima, K., Badlani, N., Adachi, N., Usas, A., Fu, F. H. and Huard, J. (2003). Improvement of muscle healing through enhancement of muscle regeneration and prevention of fibrosis. Muscle Nerve 28, 365-372.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schultz, E., Albright, D. J., Jaryszak, D. L. and David, T. L. (1988). Survival of satellite cells in whole muscle transplants. Anat. Rec. 222, 12-17.[CrossRef][Medline]
Spiller, M. P., Kambadur, R., Jeanplong, F., Thomas, M., Martyn, J. K., Bass, J. J. and Sharma, M. (2002). The myostatin gene is a downstream target gene of basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor MyoD. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 7066-7082.
Springer, T., Galfre, G., Secher, D. S. and Milstein, C. (1979). Mac-1: a macrophage differentiation antigen identified by monoclonal antibody. Eur J. Immunol. 9, 301-306.[Medline]
Thomas, M., Langley, B., Berry, C., Sharma, M., Kirk, S., Bass, J. and Kambadur, R. (2000). Myostatin, a negative regulator of muscle growth, functions by inhibiting myoblast proliferation. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 40235-40243.
Tidball, J. G. (1995). Inflammatory cell response to acute muscle injury. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 27, 1022-1032.[Medline]
Wagner, K. R., McPherron, A. C., Winik, N. and Lee, S. J. (2002). Loss of myostatin attenuates severity of muscular dystrophy in mdx mice. Ann. Neurol. 52, 832-836.[CrossRef][Medline]
Watt, D. J., Morgan, J. E., Clifford, M. A. and Partridge, T. A. (1987). The movement of muscle precursor cells between adjacent regenerating muscles in the mouse. Anat. Embryol. (Berl) 175, 527-536.[CrossRef][Medline]
Watt, D. J., Karasinski, J., Moss, J. and England, M. A. (1994). Migration of muscle cells. Nature 368, 406-407.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wehling, M., Cai, B. and Tidball, J. G. (2000). Modulation of myostatin expression during modified muscle use. FASEB J. 14, 103-110.
Zimmers, T. A., Davies, M. V., Koniaris, L. G., Haynes, P., Esquela, A. F., Tomkinson, K. N., McPherron, A. C., Wolfman, N. M. and Lee, S. J. (2002). Induction of cachexia in mice by systemically administered myostatin. Science 296, 1486-1488.