1 Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, NC27710, USA
2 Department of Biology, Duke University, NC27708, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: h.erickson{at}cellbio.duke.edu )
Accepted 19 December 2001
![]() |
Summary |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Fibronectin, Actin, Matrix assembly, Moesin, Green fluorescent protein
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The FN matrix assembles only on the surface of living cells, in a process
that requires integrins and probably other cell surface receptors
(Mosher, 1993;
Sechler et al., 2000
;
Wu et al., 1995
). Halliday and
Tomasek (Halliday and Tomasek,
1995
) found that cells need to develop tension to assemble a FN
matrix, and Zhong et al. (Zhong et al.,
1998
) provided evidence that stretching exposes a cryptic assembly
site near the first FN-III domain. Several groups have demonstrated assembly
of FN in vitro into structures resembling matrix fibrils
(Baneyx and Vogel, 1999
;
Brown et al., 1994
;
Ejim et al., 1993
;
Mosher and Johnson, 1983
;
Peters et al., 1998
). These
assemblies typically require partial denaturing conditions and some shear in
the solution.
Our previous study used a FN-green fluorescent protein (gfp) fusion protein
to visualize the dynamics of the established FN matrix. We showed that some FN
matrix fibrils are highly stretched in living cell culture
(Ohashi et al., 1999).
However, we were not able to image the cell boundaries and internal
structures, and thus we could not easily relate the FN matrix fibrils to the
cytoskeleton. In addition, we were not able to reliably image the initial
stages of FN fibril assembly.
Hynes and Destree (Hynes and Destree,
1978) showed that extracellular FN matrix fibrils colocalized with
intracellular actin filament bundles, and Singer
(Singer, 1979
) visualized the
junction of extracellular FN fibrils with cytoplasmic actin by EM. It is now
widely recognized that integrins and associated molecules bridge the gap
between the extracellular FN matrix and the intracellular actin cytoskeleton
(Calderwood et al., 2000
).
Because of this close association of FN and actin, we wanted to develop the
gfp technology to visualize simultaneously the FN matrix and the actin
cytoskeleton. Color-shifted gfps are now available for dual labeling, and the
combination of yellow and cyan shifted green fluorescent proteins (yfp and
cfp) is especially useful (Ellenberg et
al., 1999
).
There are two ways to visualize the actin cytoskeleton using a gfp tag. One
is to prepare a fusion of actin and gfp. However, it has been reported that
actin-gfp affects cellular morphology
(Ballestrem et al., 1998;
Westphal et al., 1997
),
especially if its expression is more than 30% of the total actin
(Westphal et al., 1997
). An
alternative labeling strategy is to express gfp as a fusion to the
actin-binding domain of moesin (gfp-Moe). It was originally expected that
gfp-Moe might interfere with actin function, but in previous applications
there was no effect on Drosophila development
(Edwards et al., 1997
), even
when gfp-Moe was expressed under the control of a strong, constitutive
promoter (Kiehart et al.,
2000
) or a tissue and temporal specific promoter
(Bloor and Kiehart, 2001
).
Therefore, we chose to use Moe to visualize the actin cytoskeleton. A recent
paper has described a similar Moe-gfp construct to visualize actin dynamics,
and this also showed no effect on the cells
(Litman et al., 2000
). In the
present study, we created FN-yfp and cfp-Moe expression constructs to
visualize simultaneously the FN matrix and actin cytoskeleton. We report here
our observations on the initial formation of FN matrix fibrils, how they are
associated with actin filament bundles and how they appear to be in a
stretched state while attached to the cell.
![]() |
Materials and Methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
The FN-yfp and cfp-Moe expression vectors (10:1 ratio) were cotransfected with lipofectamine (Gibco-BRL) into NIH 3T3 fibroblasts. The cfp vector has a neo selection cassette, and clones were selected with G418 (0.7 mg/ml, Gibco-BRL). Clones were tested for FN secretion by western blot and for cfp-Moe expression by fluorescence microscopy and then checked for assembly of a FN matrix. Some clones did not assemble a matrix well, but we chose one clone that assembled a substantial FN matrix visible by FN-yfp and showed localization of the cfp-Moe to the actin cytoskeleton.
Western blotting and immunostaining
For western blots, the conditioned media was run on 5% SDS gels and
transferred to Immobilon (Millipore) using a semi-dry electroblotter
(Multiphor II, Pharmacia LKB). The membrane filters were incubated with
polyclonal antibody HB5 at a dilution of 1:1000 (this antibody was generated
against human FN and can recognize mouse FN, unpublished observations) or
anti-gfp polyclonal antibody (1:1000, Clontech) and
horseradish-peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody at a dilution of 1:1000
(BIOSOURCE) and were stained with a diaminobenzedine,
H2O2 and NiCl2. The stained membranes were
scanned using an Agfa Arcus II scanner, and the images were analyzed by the
NIH Image program for quantitative estimation.
For actin staining and immunostaining, cells were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde in PBS, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 and then incubated with polyclonal antibody HB5 (1:200) for FN, monoclonal antibody 9EG7 (1:100, Pharmingen) for activated ß1 integrin or with rhodamine-phalloidin. (1:2000, Molecular Probes) for actin filaments. The secondary antibodies, rhodamine-labeled antirabbit IgG antibody (1:200, BIOSOURCE) for FN and rhodaminelabeled anti-rat IgG antibody (1:200, PIERCE) for ß1 integrin were used.
Microscopy
Cells were maintained in DMEM (Gibco-BRL) with 10% calf serum. Cell
suspensions (100 µl; 5x104 cells/ml) were dropped onto 25
mm circular coverslips in 35 mm tissue culture dishes, incubated for 30 to 60
minutes at 37°C, then 2 ml medium (phenol red-free OPTI-MEM including 1%
FN-depleted fetal calf serum) was added and the culture maintained for 48-72
hours. The main reason for switching the media was to use a phenol-red-free
and HEPES-buffer-based media, which worked very well for monitoring living
cell culture in our original study (Ohashi
et al., 1999). Coverslips were set into a windowed chamber with 1
ml medium and observed with a Zeiss LSM410 at 37°C
(Ohashi et al., 1999
).
Excitation/emission filter sets 41028 and 31044 (Chroma) were used for yfp and
cfp, respectively. The images were recorded with a cooled CCD camera (C4880,
HAMAMATSU) and Metamorph software (Universal Imaging Corp.) and were analyzed
by Adobe Photoshop and NIH Image computer programs. For superimposition, the
digital images were artificially colored green for yfp and red for cfp to
obtain higher contrast.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
|
Unlike our original FN-gfp-transfected CHO cells, which only made a FN
matrix after confluence (Ohashi et al.,
1999), FN-yfp-transfected 3T3 cells assembled a matrix in sparse
cell cultures. Fig. 2f shows a
typical pattern of matrix assembly on a spread fibroblast. The FN is arranged
as short fibrils about 5 µm long, located over actin filament bundles. The
FN fibrils start about 5 µm in from the leading edge. FN fibrils on
adjacent actin filament bundles have variable length and are staggered,
producing a jagged band of FN parallel to the cell edge.
Western blots of conditioned medium showed that the total amount of FN plus
FN-yfp secreted by the selected 3T3 clone was about twice the amount of FN
secreted by the wild-type 3T3 cells (Fig.
3a; quantitative analysis of scanned blots also showed this). The
FN-yfp (275 kDa) was slightly larger than the endogenous FN (
257
kDa), consistent with the added mass of the yfp domain. The minor degradation
band in Fig. 3a is
185
kDa. Fig. 3b shows that the
FN-yfp secreted by the 3T3 cells is about half the amount of FN-gfp secreted
by the transfected CHO cells created previously
(Ohashi et al., 1999
). Since
the CHO cells secrete almost no endogenous FN, the total level of FN plus
FN-yfp secreted by the 3T3 cells is about the same as the FN-gfp secreted by
the CHO cells. Although only half the FN molecules are labeled in the 3T3
cells, the matrix could easily be imaged by fluorescence
(Fig. 2).
|
Colocalization of FN, integrin and actin
The colocalization of FN matrix, actin cytoskeleton and activated ß1
integrin (the antibody we used is specific for the activated integrin) is
shown in Fig. 4. FN fibrils are
typically localized along actin filament bundles, although much of the actin
does not have associated FN. The actin filament bundles are best seen without
the superimposed FN fluorescence (Fig.
4c,f). The arrows indicate the same spot in the three panels. Note
that the two arrows in 4c indicate the most distal point of the actin filament
bundles. There is a small spot of ß1 integrin at this point, which is
probably at the cell edge. Note in Fig.
4b that FN extends from the integrin patch along the actin
filament bundle toward the cell center, but also extends a short distance
beyond the cell edge. The integrin patches with FN at the cell edge were not
very common. Most of the integrin patches with visible FN were located about 5
µm in from the cell edge (Fig.
2f, Fig. 4d,e).
Some streaks of activated integrin show no obvious associated FN
(Fig. 4b,e), similar to the
observations of Pankov et al. (Pankov et
al., 2000). There was frequently a diffuse area of integrin
staining around the center of the cell.
|
Initial matrix assembly on cells
The doubly transfected 3T3 cells synthesize FN matrix fibrils on single
cells in sparse culture, permitting us to visualize the initial stages of
matrix assembly. In addition, the cfp-Moe labeling lets us localize the newly
formed FN fibrils relative to the actin cytoskeleton. Five examples of initial
matrix assembly are shown in Fig.
5 (the sites are indicated by numbers in the 0:00 frame).
Fig. 5 shows six images, and
the supplemental movie (jcs.biologists.org/supplemental) shows eight
successive images at 30 minutes intervals. In making the movie the eight
successive images were carefully aligned using patches of FN that appeared to
be fixed to the substrate. Thus all movements observed should represent
movements of the cells and associated fibrils. The steps of matrix assembly
are most clearly seen by stepping back and forth through the movie one frame
at a time. Our description and interpretation are given below.
Site 1 shows the typical initiation of small FN patches over the distal segments of actin filament bundles and their extension along the actin toward the cell center. At 0:00 there is no FN over the actin at site 1. The upper arrow indicates a spot that appears at 0:30. At 1:00 this spot moves toward the cell center, and it is also elongating in the same direction. This movement of the whole FN patch leads to the important conclusion that it is attached to the cell and weakly or not at all to the substrate. After 1:00 this distal segment of the fibril appears fixed and no longer moves, and we conclude that it is now attached to the substrate. The fibril elongates 20 µm toward the cell center, for an average growth rate of 8-10 µm/hour. A major growth step occurred from 2:00 to 2:30, when elongation appears to have leap-frogged by initiating a new spot of fibril and leaving a gap between the old and new segments. By 3:00 the gap has been filled and the fibril has increased in brightness, indicating the addition of FN molecules all along its length. Another example of addition of FN along the length is the fibril just above the fibril shown with an arrow. It is barely visible as a small patch at 2:00, but at 2:30 it has extended considerably. At 2:30 it is still quite dim, but at 3:00 and 3:30 it increases in brightness while extending only slightly.
Three other FN fibrils are initiated at site 1 at 0:30 and 1:00. The small FN fibril indicated by the lower arrow at 1:00 again shows movement of the entire fibril toward the cell center from 1:00 to 1:30. From 2:00 the initial segment does not move and appears to be attached to the substrate as the fibril elongates toward the cell center. This fibril also shows a two-part growth: at 2:00 a new segment appears along this same extended fibril, and they subsequently grow together and fuse.
Similar patterns of growth are seen at site 2. The fibril indicated by the upper arrow at 1:00 appears to be fixed at its distal tip, as this does not move in subsequent frames. However the segment of this fibril toward the cell center rotates at 1:30, suggesting that this part of the fibril is attached to the cell and not the substrate. The fibril indicated by the lower arrow is initiated separately as two spots at 30 and 60 minutes. These grow and coalesce into a fibril at 1:30, which shows small movements in subsequent frames. This initiation at two spots, which later grow together and fuse, is similar to the leap-frog growth observed at site 1.
A different pattern of assembly is seen at sites 3, 4 and 5. The first stage is similar to the above, as short FN fibrils are initiated on several adjacent actin filament bundles, forming a zig-zag zone (Fig. 2 shows a similar arrangement). However, in a second stage, these short fibrils appear to coalesce, forming a thick band more or less parallel to the cell edge. The integrity of this band as a fusion of the initial FN segments is indicated by the stretching seen at site 4 from 3:00 to 3:30. Thus the fusion of fibrils initially perpendicular to the cell edge forms a thicker band of FN that is largely parallel to the cell edge.
Finally, we should note the very dramatic movement of two FN fibrils marked by arrows at 0:00. The right hand fibril breaks its attachment at the upper right at 0:30 and contracts. From 1:00 to 3:00 it appears loosely attached to the substrate and shows only small movements. The left hand fibril exhibits substantial movements of its upper part from 0:00 to 2:00, and then from 2:00 to 3:30 the largely invisible cell on the right pulls the middle segment of the fibril about 20 µm to the right, bending and stretching the fibril. The contour length of this fibril increased about 50% from 1:00 to 3:00.
FN fibril movements following cytochalasin treatment
We used cytochalasin B to disrupt the actin cytoskeleton to see how the
newly assembled FN fibrils respond when released from the cell.
Fig. 6 shows an example in
which a matrix fibril is released and contracts to about one third of its
original length. The fibrils toward the bottom of the field are apparently
attached to the substrate, as they are completely superimposed at the three
time points. The vertical fibril indicated by the arrow, and the horizontal
fibril to which it is attached, show substantial contraction and movement when
the cytoskeleton collapses at 20 minutes.
|
The cytochalasin experiments were performed 15 times. In every experiment, the majority of the FN fibrils showed no movement, whereas a few fibrils showed a substantial contraction. After cytochalasin treatment, the cells showed a small contraction or shrinkage toward the cell center. On the contrary, the contractions of FN matrix fibrils always occurred in the opposite direction, indicating that the fibril movements are not due to the cell movements.
Fig. 7 shows a cell two hours before, just before and 30 minutes after adding cytochalasin B. The actin cytoskeleton was completely disrupted at the 30 minute time point. Staining for integrins (Fig. 7d) showed that most integrin streaks were dispersed as the actin cytoskeleton was disrupted, but some remained, colocalizing with prominent FN fibrils. FN fibrils displayed two types of behavior. Most fibrils, especially the segments toward the cell edge, appeared rigidly fixed both before and after the addition of cytochalasin, but others showed substantial growth before or contraction after adding cytochalasin. The fibrils that did move showed contractions to a half to a quarter of their initial length. The movements are best seen in the superimpositions of two time frames. Fig. 7a,b shows a superimposition of the FN fibrils at times minus 120 minutes and 0 minutes, showing that some fibrils elongate (seen as a green fibril extended to the right). The segments of these elongating fibrils toward the cell edge are perfectly superimposed at the two time points. Since these segments showed no movement at all, we believe they are attached to the substrate. Fig. 7b,c superimposes FN just before and 30 minutes after adding cytochalasin. Again, most fibril segments, especially those toward the cell edge, are perfectly superimposed, implying attachment to the substrate. However, several fibrils do show substantial contractions, typically of the segment toward the cell center. Examples of contracted fibrils are shown at higher magnification in Fig. 7b', c'. The upper two panels in Fig. 7b', c' show little increase in fluorescence for the contracted fibrils, but this may be because the fibril appears to split in two. Most contracted fibrils showed significantly increased fluorescent intensity (the middle and the bottom sets in Fig. 7b', c').
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Hynes and Destree (Hynes and Destree,
1978) originally used double label immunofluorescence to
demonstrate the colocalization of FN and actin filament bundles. Singer
(Singer, 1979
) visualized the
junction of extracellular FN fibrils with actin filament bundles by EM. Both
of these studies concluded that the FN was primarily on the bottom (substrate
side) of the cells, and our observations agree with this. These previous
studies were necessarily static and also could not determine whether the FN
fibrils were in early or late stages of development. We have now been able to
visualize the initial stages of matrix assembly from the first appearance of a
spot of FN to its growth into fibrils and patches.
Our observations suggest general features of FN matrix assembly. Assembly
begins as a deposition of a small spot of FN, and this always occurs over the
end of an actin filament bundle. These ends stained for activated ß1
integrin, in agreement with previous findings
(Pankov et al., 2000). The
tips of the actin filament bundles that initiate FN fibrils are usually not
the ones closest to the cell edge but more mature ones 5-10 µm toward the
cell center. However, it is possible that FN assembly begins closer to the
leading edge but does not accumulate enough FN-yfp to be visible until cell
migration has moved these sites a bit inward. When first initiated the FN
patches appear to be attached to the cell and not the substrate, as they can
move with the cell (Fig. 5)
(Movie at jcs.biologists.org). As the fibril starts to elongate this distal
tip typically becomes fixed, as if it were attached to the substrate. The
fibril then grows by extending the other end toward the cell center. This
segment of FN fibril toward the cell center frequently shows movements
suggesting attachment to the cell and not the substrate.
The movements of the initial patch of FN toward the cell center might be
due either to movement of the focal contact, as observed by Smilenov et al.
(Smilenov et al., 1999) or to
translocation of ß1 integrins out from a fixed
Vß3 focal
contact, as reported by Pankov et al.
(Pankov et al., 2000
). Since
we generally observed only FN and not the ß1 integrins we cannot
distinguish between these two mechanisms. We observed fibrils to elongate at a
rate of 8-10 µm/hour toward the cell center, which is similar to the
6.5-7.2 µm/hour velocity of integrin movements reported previously
(Pankov et al., 2000
;
Smilenov et al., 1999
).
The location of the initial patch of FN over the actin filament bundles is
clear, but determining where FN molecules are added as the fibril extends is a
more difficult question. We can combine our observations with those of Pankov
et al. (Pankov et al., 2000)
for the following model. Our observations suggest that once the fibril has
elongated somewhat, the older segment, toward the cell edge, appears static.
It shows no movement and therefore appears to be attached to the substrate.
Moreover, it shows no increase in brightness, so there is no indication that
these fixed segments are growing. The segment toward the cell center shows
both extension and an increase in brightness. This implies that new FN
molecules are being added all along the segment. The growth toward the cell
center could be due to addition of new molecules at this end of the fibril or
to extension of the existing fibril by translocation and stretching. The
latter scenario is suggested by Fig.
5D of Pankov et al. (Pankov et
al., 2000
), where a fibril assembled from labeled FN was allowed
to grow for 40 minutes with unlabeled FN. The labeled fibril grew longer and
was labeled along its entire new length. This suggests that the existing FN
segment was extended by stretching and adding new FN molecules along its
length as it was stretched.
Are these growing FN fibrils under tension and stretched? This question is complicated by the tendency of the fibrils to form attachments to the substrate. Thus the majority of fibrils showed no detectable movement in the 30 minutes following cytochalasin treatment. However, a small fraction of fibrils did show movement, usually a segment toward the cell center. Importantly, when a fibril did move following cytochalasin, it always contracted toward the cell edge and usually contracted substantially. This suggests that these fibrils are stretched. By inference all fibrils may be stretched but adhesion to the substrate prevents their contraction.
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
![]() |
Footnotes |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Ballestrem, C., Wehrle-Haller, B. and Imhof, B. A.
(1998). Actin dynamics in living mammalian cells. J.
Cell Sci. 111,1649
-1658.
Baneyx, G. and Vogel, V. (1999). Self-assembly
of fibronectin into fibrillar networks underneath dipalmitoyl
phosphatidylcholine monolayers: Role of lipid matrix and tensile forces.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96,12518
-12523.
Bloor, J. W. and Kiehart, D. P. (2001). Zipper nonmuscle myosin-II functions downstream of PS2 integrin in Drosophila myogenesis and is necessary for myofibril formation. Dev. Biol. 239,215 -228.[Medline]
Brown, R. A., Blunn, G. W. and Ejim, O. S. (1994). Preparation of orientated fibrous mats from fibronectin: Composition and stability. Biomaterials 15,457 -464.[Medline]
Calderwood, D. A., Shattil, S. J. and Ginsberg, M. H.
(2000). Integrins and actin filaments: reciprocal regulation of
cell adhesion and signaling. J. Biol. Chem.
275,22607
-22610.
Edwards, K. A., Demsky, M., Montague, R. A., Weymouth, N. and Kiehart, D. P. (1997). GFP-moesin illuminates actin cytoskeleton dynamics in living tissue and demonstrates cell shape changes during morphogenesis in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 191,103 -117.[Medline]
Ejim, O. S., Blunn, G. W. and Brown, R. A. (1993). Production of artificial-orientated mats and strands from plasma fibronectin: A morphological study. Biomaterials 14,743 -748.[Medline]
Ellenberg, J., Lippincott-Schwartz, J. and Presley, J. F. (1999). Dual-colour imaging with GFP variants. Trends Cell Biol. 9,52 -56.[Medline]
George, E. L., Georges-Labouesse, E. N., Patel-King, R. S.,
Rayburn, H. and Hynes, R. O. (1993). Defects in mesoderm,
neural tube and vascular development in mouse embryos lacking fibronectin.
Development 119,1079
-1091.
Halliday, N. L. and Tomasek, J. J. (1995). Mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix influence fibronectin fibril assembly in vitro. Exp. Cell Res. 217,109 -117.[Medline]
Hynes, R. O. (1990).Fibronectins . New York: Springer-Verlag.
Hynes, R. O. and Destree, A. T. (1978). Relationships between fibronectin (LETS protein) and actin. Cell 15,875 -886.[Medline]
Kiehart, D. P., Galbraith, C. G., Edwards, K. A., Rickoll, W. L.
and Montague, R. A. (2000). Multiple forces contribute to
cell sheet morphogenesis for dorsal closure in Drosophila. J. Cell
Biol. 149,471
-490.
Litman, P., Amieva, M. R. and Furthmayr, H. (2000). Imaging of dynamic changes of the actin cytoskeleton in microextensions of live NIH3T3 cells with a GFP fusion of the F-actin binding domain of Moesin. BMC Cell Biol 1, 1.[Medline]
Mosher, D. F. (1993). Assembly of fibronectin into extracellular matrix. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 3, 214-222.
Mosher, D. F. and Johnson, R. B. (1983). In
vitro formation of disulfidebonded fibronectin multimers. J. Biol.
Chem. 258,6595
-6601.
Ohashi, T., Kiehart, D. P. and Erickson, H. P.
(1999). Dynamics and elasticity of the fibronectin matrix in
living cell culture visualized by fibronectin-green fluorescent protein.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96,2153
-2158.
Pankov, R., Cukierman, E., Katz, B. Z., Matsumoto, K., Lin, D.
C., Lin, S., Hahn, C. and Yamada, K. M. (2000). Integrin
dynamics and matrix assembly: Tensin-dependent translocation of
alpha(5)beta(1) integrins promotes early fibronectin fibrillogenesis.
J. Cell Biol. 148,1075
-1090.
Peters, D. M. P., Chen, Y., Zardi, L. and Brummel, S. (1998). Conformation of fibronectin fibrils varies: Discrete globular domains of type III repeats detected. Microscopy Microanalysis 4,385 -396.
Sakai, T., Johnson, K. J., Murozono, M., Sakai, K., Magnuson, M. A., Wieloch, T., Cronberg, T., Isshiki, A., Erickson, H. P. and Fassler, R. (2001). Plasma fibronectin supports neuronal survival and reduces brain injury following transient focal cerebral ischemia but is not essential for skin-wound healing and hemostasis. Nat. Medicine 7,324 -330.[Medline]
Sechler, J. L., Cumiskey, A. M., Gazzola, D. M. and
Schwarzbauer, J. E. (2000). A novel RGD-independent
fibronectin assembly pathway initiated by alpha 4 beta 1 integrin binding to
the alternatively spliced V region. J. Cell Sci.
113,1491
-1498.
Singer, I. I. (1979). The fibronexus: a transmembrane association of fibronectin-containing fibers and bundles of 5 nm microfilaments in hamster and human fibroblasts. Cell 16,675 -685.[Medline]
Smilenov, L. B., Mikhailov, A., Pelham, R. J., Marcantonio, E.
E. and Gundersen, G. G. (1999). Focal adhesion motility
revealed in stationary fibroblasts. Science
286,1172
-1174.
Westphal, M., Jungbluth, A., Heidecker, M., Muhlbauer, B., Heizer, C., Schwartz, J. M., Marriott, G. and Gerisch, G. (1997). Microfilament dynamics during cell movement and chemotaxis monitored using a GFP-actin fusion protein. Curr. Biol. 7,176 -183.[Medline]
Wu, C. Y., Keivens, V. M., O'Toole, T. E., McDonald, J. A. and Ginsberg, M. H. (1995). Integrin activation and cytoskeletal interaction are essential for the assembly of a fibronectin matrix. Cell 83,715 -724.[Medline]
Zhong, C. L., Chrzanowskawodnicka, M., Brown, J., Shaub, A.,
Belkin, A. M. and Burridge, K. (1998). Rho-mediated
contractility exposes a cryptic site in fibronectin and induces fibronectin
matrix assembly. J. Cell Biol.
141,539
-551.