1 Marine Biological Association, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB, UK
2 Station Biologique, UMR 1931 CNRS and Laboratoires Goëmar, 29680 Roscoff, France
Author for correspondence (e-mail: cbr{at}mba.ac.uk)
Accepted 28 February 2005
![]() |
Summary |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Microtubules, Polarity asymmetric division, Fucus
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
By contrast, cortical MTs are a common feature of vegetative plant cells, in which they play a key role in shaping the cell by directing deposition of cellulose microfibrils (Mfs) in the cell wall and thereby cell growth (Lloyd and Chan, 2004). In plants the interphase MT array in G1 consists of cortical MTs linked to the plasmalemma and is replaced in G2 by the pre-prophase band cortical array that marks the position of the division plane. This array disappears in late prophase and is followed in succession by the mitotic apparatus and the phragmoplast. The perinuclear MT array is in continuity with the cortical array although it is still not clear whether cortical MTs arise from the translocation of perinuclear MTs or are nucleated de novo at cortical sites or both since there is evidence for both mechanisms (Burk and Ye, 2002
; Cyr and Palevitz, 1995
; Shaw et al., 2003
).
Rather less is known about MT distributions in zygotes and embryos of higher plants, owing to their general inaccessibility for direct study. Zygotes of fucoid algae (Fucus, Silvetia) have long served as a cellular model to study fertilisation, polarisation and cell division. Oospheres are initially spherical with no detectable polarity (Jaffe, 1958). After fertilisation (AF) Fucus zygotes deposit a cell wall within minutes and establish an axis of polarity in response to external cues (such as unidirectional light) that becomes fixed in space (14-18 hours AF) and leads to the germination of a rhizoid at the side facing away from the incident light (16-20 hours AF) (Henry et al., 1996
; Love et al., 1997
; Novotny and Forman, 1974
). Concomitantly zygotes progress through the first cell cycle and divide perpendicularly to the growth axis (Corellou et al., 2001
). The first asymmetrical division gives rise to the rhizoid and thallus cells with distinct developmental fates (Bouget et al., 1998
). The rhizoid remains the only site of growth of the embryos during several rounds of division. The primary division planes in the rhizoid are oriented transverse to the polar axis whereas the first thallus cell division occurs parallel to the growth axis (Bouget et al., 1998
).
The role of the cytoskeleton in the polarisation of fucoid zygotes and in nuclear rotation has been extensively studied (Allen and Kropf, 1992; Bisgrove and Kropf, 1998
; Bisgrove and Kropf, 2001a
; Hable and Kropf, 1998
; Kropf et al., 1990
; Quatrano, 1973
). Whereas F-actin is thought to be essential for polarisation and germination MTs were found to be important for centrosomal alignment with the growth axis but dispensable for polarisation (Quatrano, 1973
). Immunocytological studies of MT arrays of Silvetia zygotes during polarisation revealed a two-step alignment of the centrosomal axis with the growth axis (Bisgrove and Kropf, 2001a
). Initially, prior to metaphase the centrosomal axis is roughly aligned with the growth axis. This alignment appears highly dependent on the connection of centrosomal MTs to the cortex and is consistent with a search-capture process in which actin plays a key role. Cortical MTs were faintly detected at the thallus in premetaphase. The exact alignment of the centrosomal axis is post-metaphasic and does not appear to require cortical MT connections. The study by Bisgrove and Kropf (Bisgrove and Kropf, 2001a
) is the only report of cortical MTs in fucoid algae and showed short and rare MTs at the thallus cortex. However, such studies have employed fixation techniques that may interfere with the normal MT distributions and moreover do not allow reorganization of MTs to be followed in the same cell. The development of in vivo techniques such as microinjection of fluorescent tubulin and more recently, expression of GFP-tubulin has considerably improved our understanding of MT behaviour in other systems (Khodjakov et al., 1997
; Yu et al., 2001
).
In the present work we microinjected fluorescent rhodamin-labelled tubulin (RT) into Fucus zygotes to gain insights into the reorganisation of MTs in vivo during early development and the first cell cycles, We were able to detect for the first time in polarizing zygotes a dense cortical MT network that lies in continuity with the perinuclear array. Cortical MTs appear to originate from cortical nucleation sites. During polarisation of the zygote, they progressively re-organise from random to a polarised array localised at the rhizoid pole. MTs parallel to the growth axis appear to support germination. MT connections between the nucleus and the cortex that facilitate nuclear rotation (Bisgrove and Kropf, 2001a) were also confirmed in vivo. The re-organisation of the cortical array appears to occur before or at the same time as the perinuclear MTs re-organize from the nuclear envelope to the centrosomes. Cortical MTs transiently disappear during mitosis but cortical patches remain until early metaphase and may be involved in late alignment of the spindle. Our data also suggest that this cortical array is required for osmoregulation.
![]() |
Materials and Methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Microinjection of fluorescent brain tubulin
Rhodamine conjugated tubulin (RT) was purchased from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). RT stock solution was centrifuged at 10,000 g at 4°C, aliquoted and frozen at 80°C. RT was diluted just before use in 50 mM KCl, 300 mM Mannitol, 5 mM Hepes pH 6.9 to achieve a final concentration of 2 mg ml1. Micropipettes fabricated from 1.2 mm filamented borosilicate glass (Harvard Apparatus, Edenbridge, UK), and dry bevelled (Roberts et al., 1993), were back-filled with the RT solution, which was maintained on ice. Zygotes were pressure microinjected using a Medical Systems (Greenval, NY) injection system. During microinjection, embryos were maintained at 10°C on a cooled microscope stage to minimize RT polymerisation during injection. Turgor pressure was reduced by adding 0.2-0.4 M sorbitol (depending on the age of the zygote) in seawater to allow injection and to minimize damage following pipette withdrawal. Based on co-injection with Oregon Green dextran 10,000 kDa (Molecular Probes), we estimate that the injected volume was less than 3% of cell volume corresponding to a maximum intracellular RT concentration of 0.06 mg ml1. After microinjection zygotes were returned to culture and allowed to recover and polarise under unidirectional blue light, for at least 1 hour during which the turgor pressure was readjusted progressively by regular media changes with a decreasing amount of sorbitol. The direction of the light was applied so that the germination site was at 90° or 180° to the injection site.
Images were acquired using a Bio-Rad 1024 confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) (Hemel Hempstead, UK) equipped with an argon/krypton laser. Fluorescent tubulin was excited at 568 nm and fluorescence was observed at 605 nm using a 10 nm band pass filter. Optical sections were acquired at 1.5 µm intervals unless otherwise stated. Sections were projected using the maximum brightness projection with LASERSHARP software (Bio-Rad).
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
A homogenous and dense cortical MT network is detected in unpolarised Fucus zygotes
27 zygotes or oospheres (three different batches) were microinjected with RT between 0 and 4 hours (AF). MT distribution was examined in zygotes using CLSM at 5-7 hours AF (Fig. 1). Tubulin was not incorporated into MTs in oospheres and the diffusion of free fluorescent tubulin from the injection site resulted in a diffuse fluorescence throughout the cytoplasmic network (Fig. 1A). By contrast, a cortical MT array was detected within minutes after injection of zygotes. In unpolarised zygotes (5-7 hours AF) randomly arranged MTs were distributed homogeneously around the cell cortex (Fig. 1B). MT arrays from the surface extended deeper into the cytoplasm. Cytoplasmic MTs (deeper than 10 µm) formed a meshwork around numerous organelles and vesicles that appeared as dark ovoid areas (Fig. 1C). Perinuclear MTs were uniformly nucleated from the nucleus through the cytoplasm towards the cortex but appeared to incorporate tubulin more slowly since some zygotes had a labelled cortex before any perinuclear MTs were detected (data not shown). One or two bright spots of fluorescence were frequently (19% n=26) associated with the nuclear surface (Fig. 1D). These most probably correspond to the centrosomes (Bisgrove and Kropf, 1998). MTs radiated from these bright spots as well as from the nuclear envelope suggesting that they may be nucleation centres.
|
|
|
|
Perinuclear MTs progressively focused from around the nuclear envelope to the centrosomes, which separated around the nucleus (68.6%, n=67). (Fig. 3A,D,G). Centrosomal MTs diverged in opposite directions towards the cortex (Fig. 3G,J). Once the centrosomes were nucleated, one of them was always connected via MTs to the site where cortical MTs were localized even before the centrosomal alignment with the growth axis was achieved (Fig. 3D). These observations suggest that the re-organisation of cortical MTs takes place before or concomitant with perinuclear re-organisation but that it does not depend upon the reorganisation of the perinuclear array.
|
MT arrays during mitosis
Zygotes entered mitosis between 20-25 hours AF (n=36). To follow mitosis in the same zygote we had to scan at close time intervals. However, this often resulted in a metaphasic arrest of nuclear division (61% n=22). Telophase figures were observed in neighbouring injected zygotes that were only scanned once (30% n=11). The time of mitosis progression (from prophase to cytokinesis) was estimated to be 2-4 hours (n=3), consistent with data reported for Fucus spiralis (Corellou et al., 2001).
At mitosis entry, the mitotic spindle formed and was roughly aligned with the growth axis in most of the microinjected zygotes (58%). However, in the remaining cases the spindle was not aligned until just prior to mitosis (Fig. 4A-H). When this late alignment was observed cortical MT foci remained until the spindle was aligned (Fig. 4F-H). In about 30% of the zygotes astral MTs extending from the basal aster of the mitotic spindle towards the rhizoid region were detectable (not shown). The connection of the nucleus to the rhizoid region disappeared as zygotes progressed into metaphase (not shown). Anaphase spindles were rarely seen probably due to the rapidity of this process. In contrast telophase figures were detected in 39% of the zygotes suggesting that this event is much slower (Fig. 4I,L). Fig. 4 shows early telophase: the spindle asters were separated by a large bundle of MTs (Fig. 4K). Nuclear envelope reformed and exhibited nucleating activity since it was clearly labelled by the fluorescent tubulin (Fig. 4J,M). At telophase a faint connection of the basal nuclei to the rhizoid tip was detected in 81% of the zygotes (Fig. 4J inset and M). Concomitantly cortical MTs reformed at the rhizoid (Fig. 4K,M) and thallus pole. Newly formed nuclei remained connected via MT bundles emanating from the nuclear envelope until the subsequent cytokinesis occurred (Fig. 4L). Multiple fine perinuclear MTs were still interdigitated whereas new transverse MTs appeared at the centre of the embryos. Nuclear MTs remained connected to the cell plate that was extending transversely towards the cell cortex.
MT arrays in two-cell embryos behave similar to zygotes
Late injection of zygotes (n=3) and of the rhizoid cell of two-cell embryos (n=9) allowed us to follow MT behaviour during mitosis in the rhizoid and thallus cells since tubulin moved readily from one cell to the other cell at this stage and was incorporated into the MT network of both cells (Fig. 5A). The thallus cell nucleus was connected to the cell apex through centrosomal and perinuclear MTs as well as to the division plane (Fig. 5B,F). In the rhizoid both centrosomes were seen connected to the rhizoid tip and occasionally also with the division plane (Fig. 5C,E). MTs connected to the rhizoid tip may serve in nuclear rotation and alignment with the growth axis before mitosis (Fig. 5E). Cortical MTs behave in a similar way as for the first mitosis, i.e. only a few cortical foci were detectable as cells entered mitosis (Fig. 5G).
MT function in the polarizing zygote
To gain insight into MT function during polarisation and germination the sensitivity of MT arrays to nocodazole was examined in polarising zygotes, (i.e. around the time of nuclear rotation). We also tested the susceptibility of polarising and germinated embryos to osmotic changes after MTs disruption by nocodazole and observed the development of zygotes continuously incubated in nocodazole.
MT arrays were disrupted by incubating 11-hour-old RT-injected zygotes in nocodazole for 2 hours (n=15). However, in contrast to the almost complete disruption of MTs observed in 6 hour zygotes (see Fig. 1E-L), cortical MTs were still detectable at the rhizoid pole in 60% of the nocodazole-treated polarised zygotes (Fig. 6A). Thus, cortical MTs at the rhizoid pole of polarised zygotes were less sensitive to nocodazole than cortical MTs of unpolarised zygotes (see Fig. 1). Most of cytoplasmic MTs were disrupted by nocodazole, but in contrast to the unpolarised zygotes, a few MTs connecting the nucleus to the germination site remained (53% of zygotes) (Fig. 6A). Those MTs originated either directly from the nuclear envelope or from the centrosome closer to the germination site.
Zygotes incubated with nocodazole for 2 hours AF were significantly more sensitive to hypo-osmotic shock. 22% of control 12-hour-old zygotes burst when the osmolarity of the seawater was reduced to 40% whereas 71% bursting was observed for nocodazole treated zygotes (Fig. 6B). Similarly, germinated embryos (24 hours AF) treated with nocodazole burst more than controls (58% and 20% respectively). Polarising embryos burst at the presumptive rhizoid site and germinated embryos burst close to the rhizoid apex. Zygotes grown from the time of polarisation with nocodazole could germinate albeit with a slight delay but exhibited abnormal rhizoid morphology (Fig. 6C) typically with broader and shorter rhizoids.
Thus disrupting MTs increased the sensitivity of unpolarised and polarised zygotes to osmotic changes and constant inhibition of MT polymerisation deeply affected rhizoid morphology.
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
What is the origin of the cortical MT array?
Cortical MTs are a common feature of plant cells and the question of whether the cortical array arises from the nuclear envelope or from the cortex is still debated. In synchronized BY-2 tobacco cells overexpressing a GFP-tubulin construct, in vivo observation from mitosis exit to G1 indicates that MTs are first nucleated at the new nuclear envelope and subsequently elongate to the cell cortex (Yoneda and Hasezawa, 2003). However
-tubulin was seen first accumulating at the nuclear surface but then spread to the cell cortex along with MTs. Since
-tubulin is a marker of microtubule organizing centres (MTOCs) this suggests that while the nuclear surface may act as the origin of cortical MTs further reorganisation of the cortical MT array occurs at the cell cortex where new MTOCs are put in place (Kumagai et al., 2003
). Moreover, a recent detailed study of the cortical MT array of Arabidopsis shows that new MTs can be initiated at the cell cortex (Shaw et al., 2003
), supporting the existence of cortical nucleation sites in plants. In Fucus zygotes, fertilisation most probably triggers the polymerisation of MT arrays since labelled MTs are not detected in oospheres. The lack of labelling of MTs in oospheres suggests that the MT network is stable and thus not incorporating tubulin. The randomly arranged cortical MT array of the zygote extends for about 10 µm beneath the plasmalemma. Optical sectioning indicates that the cortical array lies in continuity with a perinuclear array consisting of long MTs radiating from the nuclear envelope. Whether the initial cortical MTs originally arise from the growth of perinuclear MTs or from the polymerisation de novo of new MTs from cortical nucleation sites that may have translocated from the nuclear envelope could not be resolved in the present study. However, the involvement of cortical nucleation sites in the subsequent organization of cortical MTs is supported by several observations. Firstly, in numerous freshly injected young zygotes nuclear and/or perinuclear arrays were barely detectable whereas MTs were readily apparent in the cortex. This probably reflects a slower incorporation of labelled tubulin at the nuclear envelope rather than a screening effect of the cell, since increasing the power of the confocal scanning laser still failed to reveal perinuclear MTs in these zygotes. Thus, cortical nucleation sites may be more dynamic than those at the nuclear envelope in young zygotes. Second, the cortical array becomes polarised to the presumptive rhizoid site before the re-organisation of the perinuclear array, which suggests that both arrays are independent. Thirdly, while further work is needed to show definitively that that cortical MT arrays polymerise from the cortical MT foci, the location of the persisting cortical MT foci during mitosis correlates with the region in which MTs reform following mitosis. Whether MT are nucleated de novo from cortical sites or whether the nucleation centres or MTs are first located at the nuclear envelope and are then re-directed to the cortex after mitosis as is suggested to occur in BY-2 cells (Kumagai et al., 2003
; Kumagai et al., 2001
) could not be clearly determined. However, we observed that at telophase the nuclear envelope was actively nucleating MTs whereas cortical MTs had not yet reformed by the time of mitosis exit. Finally it has been postulated that nuleating material may disperse to the cortex in vegetative plant cells because of the lack of centrioles to focus MTs (McDonald et al., 1993
; Palevitz, 1993
). Since Fucus zygotes possess centrioles (Brawley et al., 1976
; Nagasato et al., 1999
), it seems that another process may have influenced the selection of cortical MTOCs in this system.
What is the role of the cortical MT array?
The cortical MT array is known to be essential for plant morphogenesis. A role for cortical MTs in controlling the orientation of cellulose Mf deposition is supported by numerous studies including the analysis of an Arabidopsis mutant for katanin (MT severing protein), in which aberrant cortical MTs and cellulose Mfs are found (Burk and Ye, 2002). Cortical MTs were also shown to be required to maintain cellulose synthase localisation (Burk and Ye, 2002
; Gardiner et al., 2003
). However a simple causal link between the orientation of cortical MTs and the orientation of Mfs (Baskin, 2001
), has recently been challenged since the mor-1 Arabidopsis mutant, in which cortical MT organization is disrupted can still display ordered cellulose Mf assembly (Himmelspach et al., 2003
).
It has been proposed that, in brown algae, F-actin would have a predominant role in cellulose Mf orientation in the apparent absence of extensive cortical MTs (Katsaros et al., 2002). A pharmacological study on spherical Silvetia zygotes showed that the disruption of F-actin, but not MTs, hampered cellulose deposition and had an effect on cell wall strength (Bisgrove and Kropf, 2001b
). Furthermore, based on the assumption that cortical MTs were absent it was concluded that F-actin rather MTs would guide cellulose synthase. The discovery, shown here, of cortical MTs that reorient parallel to the growth axis in tip growing zygotes suggests that MTs may indeed play a role in cell wall formation. This could occur in association with F-actin since our unpublished results indicate that cortical MT stability depends upon F-actin integrity (see Fig. S7 in supplementary material). It would thus be interesting to investigate the effects of MT disruption on cellulose Mf orientation. Further investigation of the interactions between actin and MTs is also warranted since Bisgrove and Kropf (Bisgrove and Kropf, 2001a
) showed that latrunculin B did not disrupt MTs associated with the mitotic apparatus.
The arrangement of cortical MTs has not been described in spherical walled plant cells to our knowledge. Fucus zygotes are natural protoplasts that build up their cell wall during the first 4 hours of development and undergo tip growth after polarisation (Brownlee and Bouget, 1998; Novotny and Forman, 1974
; Stevens and Quatrano, 1978
). It may be that the randomly arranged cortical MTs underlie a random orientation pattern of cellulose Mfs. Randomly arranged MTs are reported to occur when plant protoplasts are prepared enzymatically. MTs become progressively rearranged in BY-2 cells as cell wall is regenerated and cells start to elongate (Hashimoto, 2003
).
The re-orientation of cortical MTs from a random orientation to one parallel to the emerging rhizoid growth axis parallels the orientation of MTs in tip growing plant cells such as root hairs or pollen tubes (Smith, 2003). MTs are known to play an important role in regulating directionality and stability of apical growth (Bibikova et al., 1999
). MT inhibitors partially block gymnosperm pollen germination and growth, producing swollen apices (Anderhag et al., 2000
) similar to that which we observed when zygotes were continuously incubated with nocodazole and reported earlier in response to the microtubule stabilizing drug taxol (Kropf et al., 1990
). MTs may therefore have an important role in directing and shaping rhizoid growth. Moreover, the significantly higher sensitivity of nocodazole-treated zygotes (germinated or not) to hypo-osmotic shock indicates that MTs are involved in osmoregulation. This finding is in contrast with Bisgrove and Kropf (Bisgrove and Kropf, 2001b
) that found no effect of another MT depolymerising agent, oryzalin, on the response of Silvetia zygotes to hypo-osmotic treatments. Species differences in the sensitivity to the hypo-osmotic treatment could account, at least in part, for this discrepancy. Silvetia spp. inhabit the upper shore zone and experience greater fluctuations in their natural osmotic environment than the lower shore Fucus serratus which was used in the present study. Our own unpubished data indicate that lower shore species are less tolerant to imposed hypo-osmotic shocks than those growing on the upper shore. Finally, F-actin, but not MTs, is thought to be essential for the localisation of morphological determinants in fucoid zygotes (Hable and Kropf, 1998
; Kropf et al., 1989
; Shaw and Quatrano, 1996
). However, as cortical MTs were seen localised at the presumptive rhizoid pole before germination and since a 2 hours treatment with nocodazole was not sufficient to completely disrupt polarised cortical MTs (a time that was used in previous experiments to test the role of MTs in polarisation) (Quatrano, 1973
) it is pertinent to reconsider a role for MTs in polar axis fixation and determinant localisation. Focusing of the MT network at the animal pole has been reported in Xenopus oocytes at stage VI and is known to support morphogenetic determinant transport at this pole (Gard et al., 1997
; Miller et al., 1999
). Studies of polarization and MT organization in response to a wider range of MT disrupting agents will be required to assign a more definitive role for cortical microtubules in zygote polarization.
Mechanism of MT array reorganisation
F-actin is an early marker of the nascent growth axis in Fucus zygotes and cortical F-actin is redistributed to the presumptive rhizoid pole early in development (Hable and Kropf, 2000; Kropf et al., 1989
). Because of its close interactions with MTs (Yarm et al., 2001
) F-actin is very likely to be involved in regulation of MT reorganisation in Fucus zygotes. In yeast, the molecular factors involved in the search-capture mechanisms of MTs that underlie nuclear rotation are localised at the cortex via F-actin (Schuyler and Pellman, 2001
). In fucoid algae cortical stabilisation complexes involving cell wall connections (Kropf et al., 1988
) are presumably put in place before the switch of MT nucleation from the nuclear envelope to the centrosomes since cortical MTs are localised at the rhizoid pole and stabilised before centrosomes are nucleated. Once the nucleation switch is achieved, centrosomal MTs radiate in opposite directions from each centrosome towards the thallus and the rhizoid cortex.
Our results corroborate those of Bisgrove and Kropf (Bisgrove and Kropf, 2001) which indicate that centrosomally arising MTs in fucoid algae obey a search-capture mechanism checking the cell cortex and being captured by cortical adhesions that are more concentrated at the rhizoid cortex. This could determine the pre-metaphasic centrosomal alignment. However in contrast to the closely related Silvetia (Bisgrove and Kropf, 2001) MT connections between the nucleus and the rhizoid pole occur before rhizoid germination in Fucus and may additionally serve to direct deposition of cell wall components to the rhizoid pole as it was shown for zygotes of the fucoid alga Hormosira (Schoenwaelder and Clayton, 1999).
Centrosomal and spindle alignment with the growth axis
The mechanism of centrosomal alignment with the growth axis has been extensively studied in fucoid algae. Previous work combining tubulin immunodetection and pharmacological approaches (Bisgrove and Kropf, 1998; Bisgrove and Kropf, 2001a
) showed that initial pre-metaphasic centrosomal alignment relies on a search-capture mechanism occuring progressively before mitosis entry (at germination time) whereas final post-metaphsic centrosomal alignment does not involve cortical adhesion but is linked by an unknown mechanism to the elongation of the mitotic apparatus in anaphase/telophase. Thus, none of the treatments known to disrupt cortical adhesions hampered post-metaphasic spindle alignment (Bisgrove and Kropf, 2001a
). Likewise, in the present study most injected zygotes had their centrosomal axis roughly aligned with the growth axis at mitosis entry and thus only minor rotation of the axis occurred during mitosis. No spindle-to-cortex connections could be detected during metaphase and anaphase, and telophase spindles were impressively elongated. Telophase spindles were always better aligned than metaphase spindles. We further show that rhizoid nuclear-cortical MT connections reappeared at telophase while the thallus nucleus was seen connected to the upper cortex of the thallus cell after cytokinesis.
In conclusion, these studies provide new insights into the role of the cytoskeleton in polarization and division plane alignment. The previously undescribed occurrence of a dense cortical MT network in fucoid zygotes and embryos and its redistribution during polarization together with the relative insensitivity of polar-localized MTs to pharmacological disruption indicates a fundamental role in zygote polarization that needs to be investigated further. The persistence of cortical MT foci at the rhizoid pole and the re-growth of the cortical network from these foci suggest that they may form a component of a spatial memory during cell division.
![]() |
Footnotes |
---|
* Present adress: Laboratoire Arago, UMR 7628 CNRS and Université Pierre et Marie-Curie, 66651 Banyuls sur mer, France
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Ahringer, J. (2003). Control of cell polarity and mitotic spindle positioning in animal cells. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 15, 73-81.[CrossRef][Medline]
Allen, V. W. and Kropf, D. L. (1992). Nuclear rotation and lineage specification in Pelvetia embryos. Development 115, 873-883.
Anderhag, P., Hepler, P. K. and Lazzaro, M. D. (2000). Microtubules and microfilaments are both responsible for pollen tube elongation in the conifer Picea Abies (Norway spruce). Protoplasma 214, 141-157.[CrossRef]
Baskin, T. I. (2001). On the alignment of cellulose microfibrils by cortical microtubules: a review and a model. Protoplasma 215, 150-171.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bibikova, T. N., Blancaflor, E. B. and Gilroy, S. (1999). Microtubules regulate tip growth and orientation in root hairs of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 17, 657-665.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bisgrove, S. R. and Kropf, D. L. (1998). Alignment of centrosomal and growth axes is a late event during polarization of Pelvetia compressa zygotes. Dev. Biol. 194, 246-256.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bisgrove, S. R. and Kropf, D. L. (2001a). Asymmetric cell division in fucoid algae: a role for cortical adhesions in alignment of the mitotic apparatus. J. Cell Sci. 114, 4319-4328.
Bisgrove, S. R. and Kropf, D. L. (2001b). Cell wall deposition during morphogenesis in fucoid algae. Planta 212, 648-658.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bisgrove, S. R., Nagasato, C., Motomura, T. and Kropf, D. L. (1997). Immunolocalization of centrin during fertilization and the first cell cycle in Fucus distichus and Pelvetia compressa (Fucales, Phaephycae). J. Phycol. 33, 823-829.[CrossRef]
Bouget, F. Y., Berger, F. and Brownlee, C. (1998). Position dependent control of cell fate in the Fucus embryo: role of intercellular communication. Development 125, 1999-2008.
Brawley, S. H. and Quatrano, R. S. (1979). Effect of microtubule inhibitor on pronuclear migration and embryogenesis of Fucus distichus. J. Phycol. 15, 266-272.[CrossRef]
Brawley, S. H., Quatrano, R. S. and Wetherbee, R. (1976). Fine-structural studies of the gametes and embryo of Fucus vesiculosus L. (Phaeophyta). I. Fertilization and pronuclear fusion. J. Cell Sci. 20, 233-254.[Abstract]
Brownlee, C. and Bouget, F. Y. (1998). Polarity determination in Fucus: from zygote to multicellular embryo. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol 9, 179-185.[CrossRef][Medline]
Burk, D. H. and Ye, Z. H. (2002). Alteration of oriented deposition of cellulose microfibrils by mutation of a katanin-like microtubule-severing protein. Plant Cell 14, 2145-2160.
Corellou, F., Brownlee, C., Detivaud, L., Kloareg, B. and Bouget, F. Y. (2001). Cell cycle in the Fucus zygote parallels a somatic cell cycle but displays a unique translational regulation of cyclin-dependent kinases. Plant Cell 13, 585-598.
Cyr, R. J. and Palevitz, B. A. (1995). Organization of cortical microtubules in plant cells. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7, 65-71.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gard, D. L., Cha, B. J. and King, E. (1997). The organization and animal-vegetal asymmetry of cytokeratin filaments in stage VI Xenopus oocytes is dependent upon F-actin and microtubules. Dev. Biol. 184, 95-114.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gardiner, J. C., Taylor, N. G. and Turner, S. R. (2003). Control of cellulose synthase complex localization in developing xylem. Plant Cell 15, 1740-1748.
Hable, W. E. and Kropf, D. L. (1998). Roles of secretion and the cytoskeleton in cell adhesion and polarity establishment in Pelvetia compressa zygotes. Dev. Biol. 198, 45-56.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hable, W. E. and Kropf, D. L. (2000). Sperm entry induces polarity in fucoid zygotes. Development 127, 493-501.
Hashimoto, T. (2003). Dynamics and regulation of plant interphase microtubules: a comparative view. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 6, 568-576.[CrossRef][Medline]
Henry, C. A., Jordan, J. R. and Kropf, D. L. (1996). Localized membrane-wall adhesions in Pelvetia zygotes. Protoplasma 190, 39-52.[CrossRef]
Himmelspach, R., Williamson, R. E. and Wasteneys, G. O. (2003). Cellulose microfibril alignment recovers from DCB-induced disruption despite microtubule disorganization. Plant J. 36, 565-575.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jaffe, L. F. (1958). Tropistic responses of zygotes of the Fucaceae to polarized light. Exp. Cell Res. 15, 282-299.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jesuthasan, S. and Stahle, U. (1997). Dynamic microtubules and specification of the zebrafish embryonic axis. Curr. Biol. 7, 31-42.[CrossRef][Medline]
Katsaros, C. I., Karyophyllis, D. A. and Galatis, B. D. (2002). Cortical F-actin underlies cellulose microfibril patterning in brown algal cells. Phycologia 41, 178-183.
Keating, T. J. and Borisy, G. G. (1999). Centrosomal and non-centrosomal microtubules. Biol. Cell 91, 321-329.[CrossRef][Medline]
Khodjakov, A., Cole, R. W. and Rieder, C. L. (1997). A synergy of technologies: combining laser microsurgery with green fluorescent protein tagging. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 38, 311-317.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kropf, D. L., Kloareg, B. and Quatrano, R. S. (1988). Cell wall is required for fixation of the embryonic axis in Fucus zygotes. Science 239, 187-190.[Medline]
Kropf, D. L., Berge, S. K. and Quatrano, R. S. (1989). Actin localization during Fucus embryogenesis. Plant Cell 1, 191-200.
Kropf, D. L., Maddock, A. and Gard, D. L. (1990). Microtubule distribution and function in early Pelvetia development. J. Cell Sci. 7, 545-552.
Kumagai, F., Yoneda, A., Tomida, T., Sano, T., Nagata, T. and Hasezawa, S. (2001). Fate of nascent microtubules organized at the M/G1 interface, as visualized by synchronized tobacco BY-2 cells stably expressing GFP-tubulin: time-sequence observations of the reorganization of cortical microtubules in living plant cells. Plant Cell Physiol. 42, 723-732.
Kumagai, F., Nagata, T., Yahara, N., Moriyama, Y., Horio, T., Naoi, K., Hashimoto, T., Murata, T. and Hasezawa, S. (2003). Gamma-tubulin distribution during cortical microtubule reorganization at the M/G1 interface in tobacco BY-2 cells. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 82, 43-51.[Medline]
Lloyd, C. and Chan, J. (2004). Microtubules and the shape of plants to come. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 13-22.[CrossRef][Medline]
Love, J., Brownlee, C. and Trewavas, A. J. (1997). Ca2+ and calmodulin dynamics during photopolarization in Fucus serratus zygotes. Plant Physiol. 115, 249-261.
McDonald, A. R., Liu, B., Joshi, H. C. and Palevitz, B. A. (1993). Gamma-tubulin is associated with a cortical-microtubule-organizing zone in the developing guard cells of Allium cepa L. Planta 191, 357-361.[Medline]
Miller, J. R., Rowning, B. A., Larabell, C. A., Yang-Snyder, J. A., Bates, R. L. and Moon, R. T. (1999). Establishment of the dorsal-ventral axis in Xenopus embryos coincides with the dorsal enrichment of dishevelled that is dependent on cortical rotation. J. Cell Biol. 146, 427-437.
Nagasato, C., Motomura, T. and Ichimura, T. (1999). Influence of centriole behavior on the first spindle formation in zygotes of the brown alga Fucus distichus (Fucales, Phaeophyceae). Dev. Biol. 208, 200-209.[CrossRef][Medline]
Novotny, A. M. and Forman, M. (1974). The relationship between changes in cell wall composition and the establishment of polarity in Fucus embryos. Dev. Biol. 40, 162-173.[CrossRef][Medline]
Palevitz, B. A. (1993). Morphological plasticity of the mitotic apparatus in plants and its developmental consequences. Plant Cell 5, 1001-1009.
Quatrano, R. S. (1973). Separation of processes associated with differentiation of two-celled Fucus embryos. Dev. Biol. 30, 209-213.[CrossRef][Medline]
Roberts, S. K., Gillot, I. and Brownlee, C. (1993). Cytoplasmic calcium and Fucus egg activation. Development 120, 155-163.
Schoenwaelder, M. E. A. and Clayton, M. N. (1999). The role of the cytoskeleton in brown algal physode movement. Eur. J. Phycol. 34, 223-229.[CrossRef]
Schroeder, M. M. and Gard, D. L. (1992). Organization and regulation of cortical microtubules during the first cell cycle of Xenopus eggs. Development 114, 699-709.[Abstract]
Schroeder, T. E. and Otto, J. J. (1984). Cyclic assembly-disassembly of cortical microtubules during maturation and early development of starfish oocytes. Dev. Biol. 103, 493-503.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schuyler, S. C. and Pellman, D. (2001). Search, capture and signal: games microtubules and centrosomes play. J. Cell Sci. 114, 247-255.
Shaw, S. L. and Quatrano, R. S. (1996). The role of targeted secretion in the establishment of cell polarity and the orientation of the division plane in Fucus zygotes. Development 122, 2623-2630.
Shaw, S. L., Kamyar, R. and Ehrhardt, D. W. (2003). Sustained microtubule treadmilling in Arabidopsis cortical arrays. Science 300, 1715-1718.
Smith, L. G. (2003). Cytoskeletal control of plant cell shape: getting the fine points. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 6, 63-73.[CrossRef][Medline]
Speksnijder, J. E., Miller, A., Weisenseel, M. H., Chen, T. H. and Jaffe, L. F. (1989). Calcium buffer injections block fucoid eggs development by facilitiating calcium diffusion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 6607-6611.
Stevens, P. T. and Quatrano, R. S. (1978). Cell wall assembly in Fucus zygotes. II. Cellulose synthesis and deposition is controlled at the post-translational level. Dev. Biol. 62, 518-525.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yarm, F., Sagot, I. and Pellman, D. (2001). The social life of actin and microtubules: interaction versus cooperation. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 4, 696-702.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yoneda, A. and Hasezawa, S. (2003). Origin of cortical microtubules organized at M/G1 interface: recruitment of tubulin from phragmoplast to nascent microtubules. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 82, 461-471.[Medline]
Yu, R., Huang, R. F., Wang, X. C. and Yuan, M. (2001). Microtubule dynamics are involved in stomatal movement of Vicia faba L. Protoplasma 216, 113-118.[Medline]