1 Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Biologiche ed Ambientali, Università di Lecce, I-73100 Lecce, Italy
2 Institut für Mikrobiologie, Universität Hohenheim, 70593 Hohenheim, Germany
3 Dipartimento Farmaco-Biologico, Università di Bari, I-70125 Bari, Italy
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: vincenzo.zara{at}unile.it)
Accepted 7 June 2005
![]() |
Summary |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Citrate carrier, Mitochondria, Membrane translocation
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In most studies on mitochondrial import of carrier proteins, the ADP/ATP carrier (AAC) of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae was used as a model protein (Pfanner and Neupert, 1987; Koehler et al., 1999
; Bauer et al., 2000
; Zara et al., 2003a
; Rehling et al., 2003
; Rehling et al., 2004
). Detailed investigations led to the definition of five distinct stages of the AAC import pathway. Like all other mitochondrial carrier proteins, the AAC is synthesized in the cytosol (stage I). Mediated by three internal sequences, the AAC binds to the import receptor Tom70 at the mitochondrial outer surface (stage II). Tom70 facilitates binding to the TOM complex that mediates protein translocation across the outer membrane. The protein-conducting channel is mainly formed by the subunit Tom40. At the inner exit of the channel, the AAC binds to a soluble complex of the intermembrane space proteins Tim9 and Tim10 (translocase of the mitochondrial inner membrane, components 9 and 10). If the mitochondrial membrane potential is dissipated, the AAC accumulates at this site, defining stage III of the import pathway. Under normal conditions, the membrane potential initiates insertion of the AAC into the TIM22 complex of the inner membrane (stage IV) and formation of functional AAC homo-dimers in the lipid bilayer (stage V).
Other proteins of the mitochondrial inner membrane show significant differences from this scheme (Neupert, 1997; Rehling et al., 2003
). They are synthesized as precursor proteins containing an N-terminal presequence and target Tom20 as major import receptor. Insertion into the mitochondrial inner membrane is mediated by the TIM23 complex. Tim9/Tim10 and the TIM22 complex are not involved. Particularly interesting is the fate of the inner-membrane-protein Oxa1p (Herrmann et al., 1997
; Kuhn et al., 2003
). Similar to the carrier proteins, Oxa1p is a hydrophobic inner-membrane-protein containing several membrane-spanning segments. However, in contrast to the AAC, Oxa1p contains a presequence that directs the pre-protein to the TIM23 complex. Insertion into the inner membrane is only possible in the presence of intact Tim44 and mtHsp70.
The mechanisms of mitochondrial protein import appear to be highly conserved in evolution (Rassow and Pfanner, 2000; Koehler, 2004
). It was therefore a surprise to see that, in mammals and in plants some carrier proteins are synthesized as pre-proteins containing a cleavable N-terminal presequence (Palmieri et al., 1996
; Zara et al., 2003a
; Murcha et al., 2004
). The presequences contain several positively charged amino acid residues that are typical for mitochondrial targeting sequences. Previous studies on bovine phosphate carrier (PiC) and rat citrate carrier (CIC) showed that the mature proteins that lack the presequence (mPiC and mCIC, respectively) contained sufficient targeting information to allow efficient import into mitochondria (Zara et al., 1992
; Zara et al., 2003b
). Since data on the interactions of carrier presequences with the mitochondrial TOM and TIM complexes are lacking, it is still unclear whether these presequences direct their cargo on a Tom20-TIM23-Tim44/mtHsp70 pathway (similar to Oxa1p) or whether the carrier proteins are kept in the track of the Tom70-Tim9/10-TIM22 pathway, following the conventional stages I-V.
In this study we investigated the biogenesis of the CIC precursor protein (pCIC, tricarboxylate carrier) (Kaplan et al., 1993) and studied its interactions with distinct components of the mitochondrial protein import machinery. The CIC presequence comprises 13 residues including two arginines (MAAPRAPRALTAA). We compared the import pathway of the CIC precursor protein (pCIC) with that of the mature citrate carrier (mCIC) protein. The results show that under normal conditions the CIC presequence does not interfere with the CIC import pathway in any stage. The situation changes at increasing salt concentrations. Under conditions of high ionic strength, the pCIC presequence binds to the import receptor Tom20. However, this interaction does not entail an increase in the rate of import but an inhibition of translocation. Similar observations were made with the bovine PiC precursor protein (pPiC). We conclude that mitochondrial presequences are not optimised for strong binding but for an equilibrium that allows both specific binding and rapid release.
![]() |
Materials and Methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
For isolation of mitochondria, yeast cells were grown in YPG medium [1% (w/v) yeast extract, 2% (w/v) bacto-peptone pH 5.0, containing 3% (v/v) glycerol]. Mitochondria were isolated from rat liver and S. cerevisiae by standard procedures (Rassow, 1999) and stored in SEM buffer (250 mM sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM MOPS-KOH, pH 7.2). For import experiments involving different types of mitochondria, mutant and wild-type mitochondria were isolated in parallel at the same day, using genetically equivalent strains and identical growth conditions. The yeast strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. Import experiments that only required a wild-type strain were performed using mitochondria of the strain PK82 (Gambill et al., 1993
).
|
To open the mitochondrial outer membrane, isolated mitochondria (30 µg of protein) were suspended in 50 µl 10 mM HEPES-KOH pH 7.2. The sample was incubated at 0°C for 20 minutes. The mitoplasts were isolated by centrifuging the samples for 30 minutes at 64,000 g (2°C).
Import of pre-proteins into isolated mitochondria
Import of radiolabeled pre-proteins into mitochondria was essentially performed as described previously (Rassow, 1999; Zara et al., 1992
; Zara et al., 2003b
). Mitochondria from temperature-sensitive yeast strains (tim44-8 and ssc1-3) were incubated for 15 minutes at 37°C in import buffer to induce the phenotype.
To block Tom20 and Tom70 of rat liver mitochondria, the isolated organelles (100 µg of protein) were incubated with polyclonal rabbit antibodies at concentrations as indicated, in a volume of 50 µl for 30 minutes at 0°C. The mitochondria were again isolated by centrifugation and then used in subsequent import assays.
Pretreatment of mitochondria with trypsin was carried out at 0°C for 15 minutes. Mitochondria (20 µg of protein) were suspended in 200 µl SEM buffer and incubated with 20 µg trypsin (bovine pancreas trypsin, type XIII, Sigma T8642). The reaction was stopped by addition of 600 µg trypsin inhibitor (Soybean trypsin inhibitor, Type I-S, Sigma T9003). In subsequent steps, 0.5 mg/ml trypsin inhibitor were included to block the activity of residual protease.
For import of pre-proteins, suspensions containing mitochondria from rat liver (75 µg of protein) or from S. cerevisiae (30 µg of protein) and reticulocyte lysate were diluted with BSA-buffer (3% (w/v) BSA, 250 mM sucrose, 80 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM MOPS-KOH pH 7.2) to a final volume of 100 µl. ATP (2 mM) was added from a 100-fold concentrated stock solution. Sodium succinate (10 mM) or NADH (2 mM) were added to rat liver and S. cerevisiae mitochondria, respectively. Where indicated with `-', 1 µM valinomycin and 20 µM oligomycin were added to isolated mitochondria to dissipate the membrane potential. All import reactions were carried out at 25°C. For protease treatment, the samples were cooled to 0°C and incubated with proteinase K for 20 minutes at 0°C. The samples were subsequently incubated with 3 mM phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride (PMSF) for 5 minutes at 0°C. The mitochondria were again isolated by centrifugation and analysed by SDS-PAGE and fluorography.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
To obtain independent evidence, we used mutants of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as an alternative test system (Fig. 2). pCIC and mCIC were again synthesized in reticulocyte lysate and incubated with isolated mitochondria. The organelles were isolated from deletion strains lacking the genes encoding Tom20 or Tom70, corresponding wild-type strains were used for comparison. In agreement with the data obtained with rat liver mitochondria, import of pCIC and mCIC was significantly reduced in mitochondria lacking Tom70 (Fig. 2A,B). Import into mitochondria lacking Tom20 showed an efficiency that was similar to import efficiency into wild-type mitochondria. Su9-DHFR was again used as a reference protein because it contains a classic N-terminal presequence targeting Tom20 (Fig. 2C). AAC was imported as an alternative carrier protein (Fig. 2D). The results clearly demonstrate that the presequence of pCIC does not modify the involvement of the two import receptors Tom70 and Tom20 in targeting of the mature CIC protein. We conclude that mitochondrial targeting of pCIC is essentially mediated by Tom70, thus following the same pattern as the AAC and other members of the carrier family. The CIC presequence does not interfere with this process.
|
|
Tom22 is known to be a central organizer of the TOM complex. Depletion of Tom22 causes complete disintegration of the complex (van Wilpe et al., 1999). To test for the relevance of the TOM complex in the import of CIC, we isolated mitochondria from a tom22
yeast strain. In the in vitro import assay pCIC and mCIC were again similarly affected (Fig. 3B), indicating that the requirements for pCIC and mCIC in the interactions with the TOM complex are identical. The transfer of pCIC across the outer membrane appears to follow the same pathway as described for other carrier proteins. The N-terminal presequence does not modify the interactions with the import receptors or with the general insertion pore.
The import route of pCIC separates from the pathway of other presequence-carrying pre-proteins at the trans side of the TOM complex
The general import pore of the TOM complex is used by many different pre-proteins. Their import pathways separate at the inner exit of the pore. The AAC and other carrier proteins bind to Tim9/Tim10 for transfer to the TIM22 complex of the inner membrane. Oxa1p and similar proteins carrying a cleavable presequence are handed over to the TIM23 complex. In yeast, the exit side of the TOM complex is marked by the intermembrane space domain of Tom22 that exposes several negatively charged amino acids. The charges are thought to attract positively charged presequences and to contribute to the mechanism of pre-protein translocation (Bolliger et al., 1995; Moczko et al., 1997
; Schatz, 1997
). Although carrier proteins, such as the AAC, expose positive charges at internal residues, these residues do not bind to the intermembrane space domain of Tom22. It was therefore suggested that the trans side of Tom22 interacts specifically with N-terminal presequences (Kübrich et al., 1998
). In agreement with this, we found that import of Su9-DHFR was delayed in mitochondria of the mutant tom22-2 (Fig. 3C). In this mutant, the gene encoding Tom22 is not completely deleted, only the C-terminal part containing the negatively charged residues is missing (Moczko et al., 1997
). In contrast to Su9-DHFR, the import kinetics of pCIC were similar in tom22-2 and in wild-type mitochondria (Fig. 3D). Identical import into wild-type and tom22-2 mutant mitochondria were also observed with mCIC and with the AAC (not shown). In contrast to the presequence of Su9-DHFR, the N-terminal presequence of pCIC apparently does not recognize the trans side of Tom22.
|
Insertion of pCIC into the mitochondrial inner membrane is independent of Tim44 and matrix heat shock protein mtHsp70
Precursor proteins carrying an N-terminal presequence usually target the TIM23 complex and come into contact with mtHsp70, the major heat shock protein of 70 kDa in the mitochondrial matrix. The interaction with mtHsp70 is mainly mediated by Tim44, a hydrophilic protein that is associated with the inner side of the TIM23 complex (Neupert, 1997; Rehling et al., 2003
). To test for a role of Tim44 in the import of pCIC, we isolated mitochondria from the temperature-sensitive yeast mutant tim44-8 (Bömer et al., 1998
). Isolated mitochondria were preincubated for 15 minutes at 37°C to inactivate the mutant Tim44, wild-type mitochondria were treated in the same way. With Su9-DHFR, the tim44-8 mitochondria showed a clear phenotype: the import of Su9-DHFR was significantly reduced. By contrast, the import rates of pCIC were essentially the same in mutant and wild-type mitochondria (Fig. 5A,B). The import of AAC, performed as a control, was also unaffected in the tim44-8 mitochondria (Fig. 5C). However, these results do not necessarily exclude a participation of mtHsp70 in the insertion of pCIC into the inner membrane (Bömer et al., 1998
; Geissler et al., 2000
; Reif et al., 2001
).
|
We therefore used mitochondria from a mutant of mtHsp70 (Fig. 5D-F) in additional experiments. The mitochondria were isolated from the temperature-sensitive yeast strain ssc1-3, which was previously described as having a strong phenotype in the import of all pre-proteins that are targeted by a cleavable N-terminal presequence (Gambill et al., 1993; Voos et al., 1993
). In our assays, the ssc1-3 mitochondria showed a strongly reduced import of Su9-DHFR (Fig. 5E), but normal import of pCIC (Fig. 5D) and AAC (Fig. 5F). The combined results of Figs 4 and 5 thus indicate that the pCIC presequence does not address either the TIM23 complex or the associated mtHsp70. Similar to other carrier proteins, the biogenesis of pCIC appears to be independent of the matrix mtHsp70 system.
pCIC presequence binding to Tom20 at increasing salt concentrations inhibits translocation across the mitochondrial outer membrane
Import rates of pre-proteins that target different import receptor sites show remarkable differences in their sensitivities to increasing ionic strength (Pfaller et al., 1989; Haucke et al., 1995
). In vitro, import is commonly carried out using buffer systems that contain 80 mM KCl. We now imported AAC and Su9-DHFR into yeast mitochondria at concentrations of 80-480 mM KCl. Import was stopped after 10 minutes, samples were treated with proteinase K and we determined the relative amount of imported protein (Fig. 6A). Whereas the import rate of AAC was similar in all conditions, increasing concentrations of KCl strongly inhibited the import of Su9-DHFR. We then repeated the experiment using pCIC and mCIC as reference proteins (Fig. 6B). mCIC resembled the AAC and showed similar import rates at all salt concentrations. The import of pCIC, however, was inhibited by increasing KCl concentrations. This was the first experiment that showed a significant difference between pCIC and mCIC.
|
High salt concentrations appeared to prevent or to promote interactions of the pCIC presequence with a component of the mitochondrial import machinery. To identify the presequence interaction site, we imported pCIC and mCIC into mitochondria lacking either the import receptor Tom70 or Tom20 (Fig. 6C,D). Import into mitochondria that lack Tom70 (tom70) showed the same pattern as import into wild-type mitochondria. However, import of pCIC into mitochondria lacking Tom20 (tom20
) was no longer inhibited by KCl (Fig. 6C). Import of mCIC was again independent of the KCl concentration (Fig. 6D). The pCIC presequence appears to bind to Tom20 when hydrophobic interactions are facilitated. This conclusion is in agreement with previous studies that showed that N-terminal presequences of matrix-targeted mitochondrial precursor proteins bind to Tom20 by hydrophobic interactions (Brix et al., 1997
; Abe et al., 2000
). Binding of the pCIC presequence to Tom20 seems to cause a delay in the translocation of the protein across the mitochondrial outer membrane.
To exclude indirect effects of the TOM20 deletion, we investigated what consequences of a pretreatment with protease would have on wild-type mitochondria (Fig. 6E). In the absence or presence of KCl (400 mM), the percentage of pCIC bound to wild-type mitochondria was similar (Fig. 6E, two left columns). Subsequent treatment of the mitochondria with proteinase K (PK) confirmed that KCl inhibited the translocation of pCIC across the outer membrane (Fig. 6E, two middle columns). However, when mitochondria had been pretreated with 100 µg/ml trypsin, the KCl-dependent inhibition of import was lost (Fig. 6E, two right columns). We determined the fraction of pCIC that was imported at different KCl concentrations and found that, under these conditions, the percentage of imported pCIC vs bound pCIC decreased from 8.5% to 3% (Fig. 6F).
|
The CIC we used in this study is a protein of mammalian (rat) cells. We next asked whether, in the presence of elevated ionic strength, import of pCIC into rat liver mitochondria is similarly reduced as the import into yeast mitochondria (Fig. 7A,B). Strikingly, with rat mitochondria we obtained almost identical results as with yeast mitochondria. Import of AAC was not affected by the KCl concentration, whereas import of Su9-DHFR clearly was. At a concentration of 480 mM KCl, translocation of Su9-DHFR into mitochondria was almost completely blocked (Fig. 7A). Import of mCIC was not significantly affected by increasing salt concentrations, but import of pCIC was again reduced (Fig. 7B). The interactions of the pCIC presequence appear to be very similar to mammalian and yeast import sites, both at physiological salt levels and at increasing salt concentrations.
Import of bovine phosphate carrier precursor protein (pPiC) is inhibited at increased ionic strength
Bovine pPiC carries a presequence of 49 residues that facilitates the import into mammalian mitochondria (Runswick et al., 1987; Zara et al., 1992
). In previous studies, we observed that import of the protein into mitochondria of yeast was significantly inhibited by the presequence (Zara et al., 1992
; Zara et al., 2003a
). We now asked whether pPiC import is further inhibited at elevated salt concentrations. Using isolated mitochondria from S. cerevisiae, we imported pPiC at increasing KCl concentrations and determined the relative amounts of proteinase-K-protected protein (Fig. 7C,D). The pattern of salt-dependence showed that mPiC was imported with similar efficiencies at 80-480 mM KCl. By contrast, import of pPiC was strongly inhibited with increasing ionic strength. The result resembled the pattern that was observed with the CIC. Almost the same inhibition was observed with rat liver mitochondria (data not shown). As in the case of pCIC, increased hydrophobic interactions of the pPiC presequence with components of the TOM complex appear to delay pPiC translocation across the mitochondrial outer membrane.
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Many studies on mitochondrial protein import have already established that presequences of mitochondrial proteins can mediate several different functions (Roise and Schatz, 1988; Neupert, 1997
; Rassow and Pfanner, 2000
; Pfanner and Geissler, 2001
; Rehling et al., 2003
; Zara et al., 2003a
): (1) Specific targeting of pre-proteins to mitochondria, (2) translocation of pre-proteins across the mitochondrial outer membrane, (3) targeting of the inner membrane TIM23 complex, (4) membrane-potential-dependent translocation across the inner membrane, (5) transfer of pre-proteins to the system of chaperone proteins in the mitochondrial matrix, and (6) sorting of pre-proteins to specific mitochondrial compartments. In a first study on the presequence of pCIC, we found that in this case the presequence seems not to act as a targeting signal but as a means of increasing the solubility of the hydrophobic pre-protein, thereby increasing the import competence of pCIC in the cytosol. The pCIC presequence appears to act similarly to an internal chaperone (Zara et al., 2003b
). However, we cannot exclude that pCIC may modify the interactions of the pre-protein with the system of TOM and TIM complexes inside mitochondria, direct the CIC protein on a new import pathway, and thus participate in the functional aspects 2-6.
Based on the data presented in this study, we propose that under physiological conditions the presequence of rat pCIC is not engaged in any essential interactions with the mitochondrial protein import machinery. In the case of pCIC import, it is not the presequence that mediates the import of the mature protein into mitochondria but it is the mature protein that carries the presequence as a passenger peptide. The chaperoning function of the pCIC presequence seems to be the essential task in the biogenesis of the protein, demonstrating a further possible function of mitochondrial presequences in addition to the six functions mentioned above.
Whereas pCIC bypassed the import receptor Tom20 under normal conditions, it bound to Tom20 at increasing ionic strength. In this respect, the same observations were made with rat liver mitochondria (Fig. 1A and Fig. 7B) and with yeast mitochondria (Fig. 2A,B vs Fig. 6B), reflecting the structural similarities of Tom20 in all eukaryotes (Likic et al., 2005). The interaction was specifically dependent on the pCIC presequence because import of mCIC was completely independent of Tom20 at all salt concentrations tested. Surprisingly, the induction of interactions between the pCIC presequence and Tom20 did not confer an increased rate of import but a delay in membrane translocation. Inhibition of import at elevated salt concentrations was similarly observed with the presequence of the pPiC. In these cases, enhanced binding to receptor sites at the mitochondrial outer surface counteracts subsequent translocation. Enhanced binding of polypeptide chains at increasing ionic strength is commonly attributed to hydrophobic interactions (Dill, 1990
), suggesting that the delay in translocation is due to lasting binding to the hydrophobic presequence binding site of Tom20 (Brix et al., 1997
; Abe et al., 2000
). Since positive charges are an essential element of mitochondrial presequences, salt-dependent inhibition of pre-protein import was traditionally thought to be a consequence of weakened ionic interactions (Pfaller et al., 1989
; Haucke et al., 1995
). Our study on the presequence of pCIC indicates that it is more likely that the inhibition is mainly the result of enhanced hydrophobic interactions.
Previous data demonstrating hydrophobic binding to Tom20 (Brix et al., 1997; Abe et al., 2000
) were exclusively obtained with isolated proteins and questioned by other studies that were carried out with intact mitochondria. Several pre-proteins that expose hydrophobic targeting signals were found to either bypass Tom20 (Schneider et al., 1991
; Ahting et al., 2005
) or depend on a participation of positively charged residues in the vicinity of the hydrophobic segment (Motz et al., 2002
; Stan et al., 2003
). Mitochondrial import of porins is assisted by Tom20, although porins lack both a typical presequence and a hydrophobic membrane anchor (Krimmer et al., 2001
; Müller et al., 2002
). Our data on the import of pCIC are in agreement with the in vitro data (Brix et al., 1997
; Abe et al., 2000
) and support the conclusion that the same presequence binding site is accessible in isolated Tom20 and in mitochondrial Tom20 within the TOM complex.
The reactions that determine the rate-limiting steps in mitochondrial protein import have not been defined in detail. Several conditions were established that allow an arrest of translocating carrier proteins in distinct steps of the import pathway but the precise rate-limiting reactions under normal conditions are unknown. The results of the interaction of pCIC with the mitochondrial TOM machinery indicate that, at least in some cases, not only binding of pre-proteins to receptor sites but also their subsequent release can be rate-limiting.
Import of mitochondrial carrier proteins is mediated by a chain of binding sites (Ryan et al., 1999). An `acid-chain model' was previously suggested to explain the import of hydrophilic pre-proteins (Schatz, 1997
). In analogy to this model, a chain of hydrophobic binding sites may direct the import of carrier proteins. Three components that are directly involved in the passage of proteins across the outer membrane were suggested to act in a chaperone-like manner: Tom70 (Wiedemann et al., 2001
), Tom40 (Esaki et al., 2003
) and the Tim9/Tim10 complex (Koehler et al., 1998
; Curran et al., 2002a
; Vial et al., 2002
; Lu et al., 2004
). The observation of import inhibition by enhanced binding to receptor sites indicates that these components were evolutionary not optimised for the strongest binding of targeting signals but for specificity and the possibility of sufficiently rapid release. These requirements may account for the ambiguities that were observed, particularly in the characterization of Tom20. This import receptor shows specific interactions with several mitochondrial pre-proteins (Rapaport, 2003
) but surprisingly low affinities to their targeting sequences (Brix et al., 1997
; Brix et al., 1999
; Abe et al., 2000
). The bacterial chaperone protein GroEL revealed a system of structural changes to release bound substrate proteins from hydrophobic binding sites (Hartl, 1996
; Ranson et al., 1998
; Sigler et al., 1998
). It is tempting to speculate that the mitochondrial protein import machinery applies similar mechanisms to prevent irreversible binding to hydrophobic sites.
In summary, we propose three conclusions: (1) Differently from other mitochondrial pre-proteins, pCIC contains a presequence that does not act as a mediator of protein transport. The presequence is imported as a passenger of the mature protein, which contains the targeting information and does not interfere with the CIC import pathway. (2) The pCIC presequence binds to Tom20 when hydrophobic interactions are facilitated. (3) In general, mitochondrial outer membrane proteins can only act as import receptors if they show sufficiently rapid release of their substrate proteins. The stability of the receptor-substrate complex has to be low enough to allow a continuous flow within a sequence of binding sites.
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Abe, Y., Shodai, T., Muto, T., Mihara, K., Torii, H., Nishikawa, S., Endo, T. and Kohda, D. (2000). Structural basis of presequence recognition by the mitochondrial protein import receptor Tom20. Cell 100, 551-560.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ahting, U., Waizenegger, T., Neupert, W. and Rapaport, D. (2005). Signal-anchored proteins follow a unique insertion pathway into the outer membrane of mitochondria. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 48-53.
Bauer, M. F., Sirrenberg, C., Neupert, W. and Brunner, M. (1996). Role of Tim23 as voltage sensor and presequence receptor in protein import into mitochondria. Cell 87, 33-41.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bauer, M. F., Hofmann, S., Neupert, W. and Brunner, M. (2000). Protein translocation into mitochondria: the role of TIM complexes. Trends Cell Biol. 10, 25-31.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bolliger, L., Junne, T., Schatz, G. and Lithgow, T. (1995). Acidic receptor domains on both sides of the outer membrane mediate translocation of precursor proteins into yeast mitochondria. EMBO J. 14, 6318-6326.[Abstract]
Bömer, U., Maarse, A. C., Martin, F., Geissler, A., Merlin, A., Schönfisch, B., Meijer, M., Pfanner, N. and Rassow, J. (1998). Separation of structural and dynamic functions of the mitochondrial translocase: Tim44 is crucial for the inner membrane import sites in translocation of tightly folded domains, but not of loosely folded preproteins. EMBO J. 17, 4226-4237.
Brix, J., Dietmeier, K. and Pfanner, N. (1997). Differential recognition of preproteins by purified cytosolic domains of the mitochondrial import receptors Tom20, Tom22, and Tom70. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 20730-20735.
Brix, J., Rüdiger, S., Bukau, B., Schneider-Mergener, J. and Pfanner, N. (1999). Distribution of binding sequences for the mitochondrial import receptors Tom20, Tom22, and Tom70 in a presequence-carrying preprotein and in a non-cleavable preprotein. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 16522-16530.
Curran, S. P., Leuenberger, D., Oppliger, W. and Koehler, C. M. (2002a). The Tim9p-Tim10p complex binds to the transmembrane domains of the ADP/ATP carrier. EMBO J. 21, 942-953.
Curran, S. P., Leuenberger, D., Schmidt, E. and Koehler, C. M. (2002b). The role of the Tim8p-Tim13p complex in a conserved import pathway for mitochondrial polytopic inner membrane proteins. J. Cell Biol. 158, 1017-1027.
Dietmeier, K., Hönlinger, A., Bömer, U., Dekker, P. J. T., Eckerskorn, C., Lottspeich, F., Kübrich, M. and Pfanner, N. (1997). Tom5 functionally links mitochondrial preprotein receptors to the general import pore. Nature 388, 195-200.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dill, K. A. (1990). Dominant forces in protein folding. Biochemistry 29, 7133-7155.[CrossRef][Medline]
Esaki, M., Kanamori, T., Nishikawa, S., Shin, I., Schulz, P. J. and Endo, T. (2003). Tom40 protein import channel binds to non-native proteins and prevents their aggregation. Nat. Struct. Biol. 10, 988-994.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gambill, B. D., Voos, W., Kang, P. J., Miao, B., Langer, T., Craig, E. A. and Pfanner, N. (1993). A dual role for mitochondrial heat shock protein 70 in membrane translocation of preproteins. J. Cell Biol. 123, 109-117.[Abstract]
Geissler, A., Krimmer, T., Schönfisch, B., Meijer, M. and Rassow, J. (2000). Biogenesis of the yeast frataxin homolog Yfh1p. Tim44-dependent transfer to mtHsp70 facilitates folding of newly imported proteins in mitochondria. Eur. J. Biochem. 267, 3167-3180.
Hartl, F. U. (1996). Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding. Nature 381, 571-579.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hartl, F. U., Pfanner, N., Nicholson, D. W. and Neupert, W. (1989). Mitochondrial protein import. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 988, 1-45.[CrossRef][Medline]
Haucke, V., Lithgow, T., Rospert, S., Hahne, K. and Schatz, G. (1995). The yeast mitochondria protein import receptor Mas20p binds precursor proteins through electrostatic interaction with the positively charged presequence. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 5565-5570.
Herrmann, J. M., Neupert, W. and Stuart, R. A. (1997). Insertion into the mitochondrial inner membrane of a polytopic protein, the nuclear-encoded Oxa1p. EMBO J. 9, 2217-2226.[CrossRef]
Hwang, S., Jascur, T., Vestweber, D., Pon, L. and Schatz, G. (1989). Disrupted yeast mitochondria can import precursor proteins directly through their inner membrane. J. Cell Biol. 109, 487-493.[Abstract]
Kaplan, R. S., Mayor, J. A. and Wood, D. O. (1993). The mitochondrial tricarboxylate transport protein. cDNA cloning, primary structure, and comparison with other mitochondrial transport proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 13682-13690.
Koehler, C. M. (2004). New developments in mitochondrial assembly. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 20, 309-335.[CrossRef][Medline]
Koehler, C. M., Merchant, S., Oppliger, W., Schmid, K., Jarosch, E., Dolfini, L., Junne, T., Schatz, G. and Tokatlidis, K. (1998). Tim9p, an essential partner subunit of Tim10p for the import of mitochondrial carrier proteins. EMBO J. 17, 6477-6486.
Koehler, C. M., Merchant, S. and Schatz, G. (1999). How membrane proteins travel across the mitochondrial intermembrane space. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, 428-432.[CrossRef][Medline]
Krimmer, T., Rapaport, D., Ryan, M. T., Meisinger, C., Kassenbrock, C. K., Blachly-Dyson, E., Forte, M., Douglas, M. G., Neupert, W. et al. (2001). Biogenesis of porin of the outer mitochondrial membrane involves an import pathway via receptors and the general import pore of the TOM complex. J. Cell Biol. 152, 289-300.
Kübrich, M., Rassow, J., Voos, W., Pfanner, N. and Hönlinger, A. (1998). The import route of ADP/ATP carrier into mitochondria separates from the general import pathway of cleavable preproteins at the trans side of the outer membrane. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 16374-16381.
Kuhn, A., Stuart, R., Henry, R. and Dalbey, R. E. (2003). The Alb3/Oxa1/YidC protein family: membrane-localized chaperones facilitating membrane protein insertion? Trends Cell Biol. 13, 510-516.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kunji, E. R. (2004). The role and structure of mitochondrial carriers. FEBS Lett. 564, 239-244.[CrossRef][Medline]
Likic, V. A., Perry, A., Hulett, J., Derby, M., Traven, A., Waller, R. F., Keeling, P. J., Koehler, C. M., Curran, S. P., Gooley, P. R. et al. (2005). Patterns that define the four domains conserved in known and novel isoforms of the protein import receptor Tom20. J. Mol. Biol. 347, 81-93.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lu, H., Golovanov, A. P., Alcock, F., Grossmann, J. C., Allen, S., Lian, L. Y. and Tokatlidis, K. (2004). The structural basis of the TIM10 chaperone assembly. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 18959-18966.
Moczko, M., Ehmann, B., Gärtner, F., Hönlinger, A., Schäfer, E. and Pfanner, N. (1994). Deletion of the receptor MOM19 strongly impairs import of cleavable preproteins into Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondria. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 9045-9051.
Moczko, M., Bömer, U., Kübrich, M., Hönlinger, A., Zufall, N. and Pfanner, N. (1997). The intermembrane space domain of mitochondrial Tom22 functions as a trans binding site for preproteins with N-terminal targeting sequences. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 6574-6584.[Abstract]
Motz, C., Martin, H., Krimmer, T. and Rassow, J. (2002). Bcl-2 and porin follow different pathways of TOM-dependent insertion into the mitochondrial outer membrane. J. Mol. Biol. 323, 729-738.[CrossRef][Medline]
Müller, A., Rassow, J., Grimm, J., Machuy, N., Meyer, T. F. and Rudel, T. (2002). VDAC and the bacterial porin PorB of Neisseria gonorrhoeae share mitochondrial import pathways. EMBO J. 21, 1916-1929.
Murcha, M. W., Elhafez, D., Millar, A. H. and Whelan, J. (2004). The N-terminal extension of plant mitochondrial carrier proteins is removed by two-step processing: The first cleavage is by the mitochondrial processing peptidase. J. Mol. Biol. 344, 443-454.[CrossRef][Medline]
Murphy, M. P., Leuenberger, D., Curran, S. P., Oppliger, W. and Koehler, C. M. (2001). The essential function of the small Tim proteins in the TIM22 import pathway does not depend on formation of the soluble 70-kilodalton complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 6132-6138.
Neupert, W. (1997). Protein import into mitochondria. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 66, 863-917.[CrossRef][Medline]
Palmieri, F., Bisaccia, F., Capobianco, L., Dolce, V., Fiermonte, G., Iacobazzi, V., Indiveri, C. and Palmieri, L. (1996). Mitochondrial metabolite transporters. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1275, 127-132.[Medline]
Palmieri, L., Lasorsa, F. M., Vozza, A., Agrimi, G., Fiermonte, G., Runswick, M. J., Walker, J. E. and Palmieri, F. (2000). Identification and functions of new transporters in yeast mitochondria. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1459, 363-369.[Medline]
Pfaller, R., Steger, H. F., Rassow, J., Pfanner, N. and Neupert, W. (1988). Import pathways of precursor proteins into mitochondria: multiple receptor sites are followed by a common membrane insertion site. J. Cell Biol. 107, 2488-2490.
Pfaller, R., Pfanner, N. and Neupert, W. (1989). Mitochondrial protein import. Bypass of proteinaceous surface receptors can occur with low specificity and efficiency. J. Biol. Chem. 264, 34-39.
Pfanner, N. and Neupert, W. (1987). Distinct steps in the import of ADP/ATP carrier into mitochondria. J. Biol. Chem. 262, 7528-7536.
Pfanner, N. and Geissler, A. (2001). Versatility of the mitochondrial protein import machinery. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 339-349.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pfanner, N., Tropschug, M. and Neupert, W. (1987). Mitochondrial protein import: nucleoside triphosphates are involved in conferring import-competence to precursors. Cell 49, 815-823.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pfanner, N., Söllner, T. and Neupert, W. (1991). Mitochondrial import receptors for precursor proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 16, 63-67.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ranson, N. A., White, H. E. and Saibil, H. R. (1998). Chaperonins. Biochem. J. 333, 233-242.[Medline]
Rapaport, D. (2003). Finding the right organelle. Targeting signals in mitochondrial outer-membrane proteins. EMBO Rep. 4, 948-952.
Rassow, J. (1999). Protein folding and import into organelles. In Post-Translational Processing: A Practical Approach (ed. B. D. Hames and S. J. Higgins), pp. 43-94. Oxford: IRL Press.
Rassow, J. and Pfanner, N. (1991). Mitochondrial preproteins en route from the outer membrane to the inner membrane are exposed to the intermembrane space. FEBS Lett. 293, 85-88.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rassow, J. and Pfanner, N. (2000). The protein import machinery of the mitochondrial membranes. Traffic 1, 457-464.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rehling, P., Pfanner, N. and Meisinger, C. (2003). Insertion of hydrophobic membrane proteins into the inner mitochondrial membrane - a guided tour. J. Mol. Biol. 326, 639-657.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rehling, P., Brandner, K. and Pfanner, N. (2004). Mitochondrial import and the twin-pore translocase. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 519-530.[CrossRef][Medline]
Reif, S., Voos, W. and Rassow, J. (2001). Intramitochondrial dimerization of citrate synthase characterized by blue native electrophoresis. Anal. Biochem. 288, 97-99.[CrossRef][Medline]
Roise, D. and Schatz, G. (1988). Mitochondrial presequences. J. Biol. Chem. 263, 4509-4511.
Runswick, M. J., Powell, S. J., Nyren, P. and Walker, J. E. (1987). Sequence of the bovine mitochondrial phosphate carrier protein: structural relationship to ADP/ATP translocase and the brown fat mitochondria uncoupling protein. EMBO J. 6, 1367-1373.[Abstract]
Ryan, M. T., Müller, H. and Pfanner, N. (1999). Functional staging of ADP/ATP carrier translocation across the outer mitochondrial membrane. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 20619-20627.
Schatz, G. (1987). 17th Sir Hans Krebs lecture. Signals guiding proteins to their correct locations in mitochondria. Eur. J. Biochem. 165, 1-6.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schatz, G. (1997). Just follow the acid chain. Nature 388, 121-122.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schneider, H., Söllner, T., Dietmeier, K., Eckerskorn, C., Lottspeich, F., Trülzsch, B., Neupert, W. and Pfanner, N. (1991). Targeting of the master receptor MOM19 to mitochondria. Science 254, 1659-1662.[Medline]
Sigler, P. B., Xu, Z., Rye, H. S., Burston, S. G., Fenton, W. A. and Horwich, A. L. (1998). Structure and function in GroEL-mediated protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 581-608.[CrossRef][Medline]
Söllner, T., Pfaller, R., Griffith, G., Pfanner, N. and Neupert, W. (1990). A mitochondrial import receptor for the ADP/ATP carrier. Cell 62, 107-115.[CrossRef][Medline]
Stan, T., Brix, J., Schneider-Mergener, J., Pfanner, N., Neupert, W. and Rapaport, D. (2003). Mitochondrial protein import: recognition of integral import signals of BCS1 by the TOM complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 2239-2250.
Steger, H. F., Söllner, T., Kiebler, M., Dietmeier, K. A., Pfaller, R., Trülzsch, K. S., Tropschug, M., Neupert, W. and Pfanner, N. (1990). Import of ADP/ATP carrier into mitochondria: two receptors act in parallel. J. Cell Biol. 111, 2353-2363.[Abstract]
Suzuki, H., Maeda, M. and Mihara, K. (2002). Characterization of rat Tom70 as a receptor of the preprotein translocase of the mitochondrial outer membrane. J. Cell Sci. 115, 1895-1905.
van Wilpe, S., Ryan, M. T., Hill, K., Maarse, A. C., Meisinger, C., Brix, J., Dekker, P. J. T., Moczko, M., Wagner, R., Meijer, M. et al. (1999). Tom22 is a multifunctional organizer of the mitochondrial preprotein translocase. Nature 401, 485-489.[CrossRef][Medline]
Vial, S., Lu, H., Allen, S., Savory, P., Thornton, D., Sheehan, J. and Tokatlidis, K. (2002). Assembly of Tim9 and Tim10 into a functional chaperone. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 36100-36108.
Voos, W., Gambill, B. D., Guiard, B., Pfanner, N. and Craig, E. A. (1993). Presequence and mature part of preproteins strongly influence the dependence of mitochondrial protein import on heat shock protein 70 in the matrix. J. Cell Biol. 123, 119-126.[Abstract]
Wiedemann, N., Pfanner, N. and Ryan, M. T. (2001). The three modules of ADP/ATP carrier cooperate in receptor recruitment and translocation into mitochondria. EMBO J. 20, 951-960.
Zara, V., Rassow, J., Wachter, E., Tropschug, M., Palmieri, F., Neupert, W. and Pfanner, N. (1991). Biogenesis of the mitochondrial phosphate carrier. Eur. J. Biochem. 198, 405-410.[Abstract]
Zara, V., Palmieri, F., Mahlke, K. and Pfanner, N. (1992). The cleavable presequence is not essential for import and assembly of the phosphate carrier of mammalian mitochondria but enhances the specificity and efficiency of import. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 12077-12081.
Zara, V., Ferramosca, A. and Rassow, J. (2003a). Import of metabolite carrier proteins into mitochondria. In Recent Research Developments in Molecular & Cellular Biology. Vol. 4 (ed. S. G. Pandalai), pp. 101-114. Kerala, India: Research Signpost.
Zara, V., Ferramosca, A., Palmisano, I., Palmieri, F. and Rassow, J. (2003b). Biogenesis of rat mitochondrial citrate carrier (CIC): The N-terminal presequence facilitates the solubility of the preprotein but does not act as a targeting signal. J. Mol. Biol. 325, 399-408.[CrossRef][Medline]