1 Center for Regenerative Biology, University of Connecticut, 1392 Storrs Road, Storrs, CT 06269-4243, USA
2 Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Nine Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
3 Department of Biology, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
4 Department of Animal Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-4040, USA
5 Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-3042, USA
Author for correspondence (e-mail: theodore.rasmussen{at}uconn.edu)
Accepted 26 January 2005
![]() |
Summary |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: chromatin, methylation, Dnmt1, MacroH2A, centromere, chromocenter
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Constitutive heterochromatin is assembled upon mammalian centromeres and surrounding pericentric sequences. The histone H3 variant CENP-A replaces histone H3 in nucleosomes assembled at centromeres (Palmer et al., 1987). Pericentric nucleosomes also contain a high content of histone H3 that is post-translationally modified by methylation at lysine residue 9 (me-H3-K9), a modification that is associated with transcriptional inactivity (Lachner et al., 2001
; Maison et al., 2002
; Rea et al., 2000
). The me-H3-K9 modification serves as a cis-acting binding site for heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) (Bannister et al., 2001
; Jacobs and Khorasanizadeh, 2002
; Lachner et al., 2001
), an interaction that serves to sequester interphase centromeres in discrete foci (chromocenters). In addition, regions in and around mammalian centromeres are subject to heavy DNA methylation at CpG dinucleotides. In short, constitutive heterochromatin contains a distinct molecular signature consisting of heavy methylation of CpG dinucleotides coupled with chromatin enriched in CENP-A, me-H3-K9 and concomitant association with HP1.
Facultative heterochromatin such as that of the inactive X chromosome (Xi) also contains a distinct molecular signature. Though numerous reports show that CpG islands of silenced X-linked genes are highly methylated, the overall levels of methylation on Xi appear to be reduced relative to the active X chromosome (Xa) and autosomes (Viegas-Pequignot et al., 1988). In addition, the chromatin of Xi is enriched in histone H3 methylated at lysine 27 (me-H3K27) (Plath et al., 2003
; Silva et al., 2003
) and macroH2A, a variant of canonical histone H2A, which contains a large C-terminal extension (Costanzi and Pehrson, 1998
; Pehrson and Fried, 1992
). On a molecular level, MacroH2A interferes with NF-kappaB transcription factor binding and SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling (Angelov et al., 2003
). Furthermore, the C-terminal nonhistone domain (NHD) of macroH2A may be involved in ADP-ribosylation of chromatin with potential implications for transcriptional silencing (Ladurner, 2003
). The crystal structure of the AF1521 protein from Archaeoglobus fulgidus was recently determined (Allen et al., 2003
). This protein is similar to the NHD of macroH2A and probably binds nucleic acids, suggesting a possible role for macroH2A in chromatin condensation.
Methylation of CpG dinucleotides in mice is maintained by the action of Dnmt1, a maintenance DNA methyltransferase that converts hemimethylated CpG dinucleotides to symmetrically methylated dinucleotides (Pradhan et al., 1999). Loss of Dnmt1 results in embryonic lethality, but undifferentiated embryonic stem (ES) cells lacking Dnmt1 function are fully viable (Li et al., 1992
). Since ES cells are viable in the absence of CpG demethylation, we used these cells to investigate the molecular composition of demethylated heterochromatin. We show that loss of DNA methylation causes a significant reorganization of constitutive heterochromatin involving the histone variant macroH2A. This finding raises the intriguing possibility that mammalian heterochromatin adopts a default state, reminiscent of facultative heterochromatin, in response to DNA demethylation.
![]() |
Materials and Methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
ES cells were grown under standard conditions (on irradiated fibroblast feeder layers) in ES cell medium (ESCM) consisting of DMEM-based medium (Gibco) supplemented with non-essential amino acids, 2 µl/l ß-mercaptoethanol and 500 units/ml leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) on gelatinized plastic tissue culture vessels. Feeders were removed by trypsinizing ES cell cultures and panning out feeder cells by incubation for 30 minutes of growth on plates not treated with gelatine. ES cells were then plated for an additional passage without feeder cells in ESCM supplemented with 1000 units/ml LIF prior to trypsinization and growth on slides (for cell biological analysis) or harvest of nuclei for chromatin fractionation (below).
Mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) cell lines harboring homozygous conditional mutations in Dnmt1, methods to induce cre-mediated loss of function and Y-chromosome PCR were described previously (Jackson-Grusby et al., 2001).
Southern blot analysis
Southern blotting was performed by separating 10 µg of genomic DNA (digested to completion with indicated restriction enzymes) per lane on 1% agarose gels. DNA was then transferred to Genescreen PlusTM nylon membrane (Dupont-NEN). Blots were hybridized with probes derived from radiolabeled extension of random hexamers annealed to the purified inserts of plasmids pMR150 (mouse centromeric repeats) or pKS13b (Line-1 elements), or CoT1 DNA (Gibco; containing total mouse repetitive DNA).
Antibody development
Polyclonal antibodies directed against macroH2A were prepared by cloning a cDNA fragment corresponding to the complete nonhistone domain (NHD) portion of a macroH2A1.2 cDNA (Rasmussen et al., 1999) into the plasmid pGEX-3T (Frorath et al., 1992
). To do this, a unique PacI site was introduced at the junction of the histone and NHD coding regions in the macroH2A1.2 cDNA (Rasmussen et al., 1999
), and the NHD coding region was fused to GST in a vector with a thrombin cleavage site between the GST and NHD moieties (Fig. 2A). Recombinant GST/NHD fusion protein was expressed in E. coli strain DH5
and GST-NHD fusion protein was then eluted with reduced glutathione. Alternatively, pure NHD was released from the column by thrombin digestion and used to immunize a New Zealand white rabbit (Covance). Serum samples were assayed by western blotting and IgG was purified from reactive serum on protein A-agarose beads (Sigma). Alternatively, antibody was affinity-purified from serum using an affinity column assembled by covalently attaching pure NHD protein to cyanogen bromide-activated Sepharose CL-4B (Sigma). Affinity-purified antibody was eluted from this matrix with low pH, and the eluted antibody was dialyzed in PBS. The resulting antibody recognized endogenous macroH2A in total cellular protein from embryonic stem cells. In addition, the antibody detected inactive X chromosomes in female fibroblasts, and centrosomal-associated macroH2A in undifferentiated ES cells (data not shown). These are both established patterns of macroH2A localization as determined with an independently derived antibody (Costanzi and Pehrson, 1998
; Rasmussen et al., 2000
).
|
Cell biological methods
Immunofluorescence and western blotting were performed using -macroH2A (above),
-HP1 (Serotec, cat. no. MAC353) and CREST autoimmune serum (kindly supplied by Steven Doxsey) using methods previously described (Rasmussen et al., 2000
). Additional primary antibodies used include:
-H2B (Chemicon, cat. no. AB1623);
-trimethyl-H3K27 (Upstate, cat. no. 07-449);
-trimethyl-H3K9 (Upstate, cat. no. 07-442);
-trimethyl-H3K4 (Upstate, cat. no. 07-473).
Chromosome spreads were prepared from ES cells grown without feeder cells in ESCM supplemented with 1000 units/ml LIF. Colchicine (Sigma) was added to cells 2 hours prior to harvest at a concentration of 1 µg/ml, then cells were trypsinized, washed once, and resuspended in 5 ml of 0.075 M KCl at 37°C for 12 minutes. Cells were then pelleted carefully at 800 rpm in a tabletop centrifuge, resuspended in residual supernatant and dropped onto slides to liberate chromosome spreads, followed by immediate fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS at 4°C for 5 minutes. Slides were washed in PBS and immediately subjected to immunofluorescence.
Chromatin fractionation
Nucleosomes were prepared essentially as described previously (Thorne et al., 1998). Cells were harvested and washed in ice-cold PBS-butyrate (135 mM NaCl, 250 mM KCl, 8 mM Na2HPO4, 1.5 mM KH2PO4, 10 mM sodium butyrate), then resuspended in cell lysis buffer (250 mM sucrose, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 10 mM sodium butyrate, 4 mM MgCl2, 0.1% Triton X-100) with protease inhibitors (1 tablet of protease inhibitor cocktail; Roche, cat. no. 1697498), and lysed with 20 strokes of a Dounce homogenizer (type B pestle). Nuclei were pelleted by centrifugation for 10 minutes at 2000 g at 4°C, then resuspended in 3 ml of wash buffer C (250 mM sucrose, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 10 mM sodium butyrate, 4 mM MgCl2 and protease inhibitors) and layered over a 5 ml sucrose cushion (30% sucrose w/v in wash buffer C). Nuclei were then centrifuged at 2400 g for 5 minutes at 4°C in a swinging bucket rotor and the nuclear pellet was resuspended in 250 µl of wash buffer C. CaCl2 was added to a final concentration of 1 mM and incubated at 37°C for 8 minutes in the presence of 8 µl of micrococcal nuclease (MNase, 5 units/µl). Digestion was stopped by adding EDTA to a concentration of 10 mM. Nuclei were then pelleted and resuspended in 500 µl of 0.2 mM ice-cold EDTA, pH 7.0 for 1 hour. This hypotonic treatment forced nucleosomes into the supernatant (extraction 1). The nuclei were then extracted a second time (3 hours of diffusion), yielding a chromatin fraction containing micrococcal nuclease-resistant polynucleosomes (extraction 2). Chromatin samples were analyzed for DNA content after phenol/chloroform extraction, and protein content was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and western blotting using standard methods.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
Demethylation-induced chromatin remodeling in pericentric DNA
The variant histone macroH2A has previously been shown to associate with pericentric DNA in preimplantation mouse embryos (Costanzi et al., 2000) and spermatocytes (Hoyer-Fender et al., 2004
). The results presented in Fig. 1 confirmed that pericentric DNA is highly demethylated upon loss of Dnmt1 function in ES cells. We therefore sought to test whether loss of pericentric DNA methylation influenced the distribution of macroH2A in Dnmt1-mutant ES cells. MacroH2A resembles canonical histone H2A except for the presence of a C-terminal non-histone domain (NHD) roughly twice the size of the histone core domain (Pehrson and Fried, 1992
). We purified recombinant NHD protein and used it as an immunogen to create a polyclonal antibody that detected macroH2A but not endogenous H2A in total protein extracted from ES cells (Fig. 2).
We performed immunofluorescence on a panel of male ES cells bearing mutations in Dnmt1 to investigate potential alterations of pericentric chromatin resulting from reductions in levels of CpG methylation (Fig. 3A). These cells included a wild-type line (J1), ES cells with Dnmt1N/N, Dnmt1S/S, Dnmt1C/C genotypes (which all cause extensive demethylation of the genome), and remethylated ES cell line B9. Interphase nuclei of ES cells of all genotypes contained condensed regions that stained intensely with DAPI (Fig. 3A). These condensed chromocenter-like foci correspond to the sites of interphase centromeres, and can be identified using CREST antisera, human autoimmune serum from schleroderma patients that specifically recognizes interphase kinetochore proteins (Brenner et al., 1981). Though chromocenters were intact and apparently unaffected by DNA methylation levels, we noted alterations in the appearance of chromocenter histones. We observed a dramatic increase of macroH2A immunostaining in hypomethylated chromocenters (Fig. 3A). In undifferentiated wild-type J1 ES cells, macroH2A exhibited diffuse nuclear staining; a localization pattern observed with several other fully methylated ES cell lines (data not shown). However, in Dnmt1N/N, Dnmt1S/S, Dnmt1C/C cells, we noticed intense concentrations of macroH2A that were coincident with chromocenters. We double-labeled Dnmt1C/C cells to visualize macroH2A and CREST antigens and found that concentrations of macroH2A are often adjacent to CREST signals (Fig. 3B). The pericentric concentrations of macroH2A were reversed in rescued cell line B9. We conclude that chromatin remodeling involving macroH2A occurs within interphase pericentric chromatin.
|
Pericentric DNA is known to associate with heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) via direct interactions that occur between HP1 and histone H3 methylated at lys 9 (Bannister et al., 2001; Jacobs et al., 2001
; Lachner et al., 2001
). We found that HP1 co-localizes with chromocenters in ES cells regardless of their Dnmt1 genotype (Fig. 3C). However, macroH2A becomes concentrated in demethylated chromocenters marked by HP1 immunostaining.
Because chromocenters contain interphase centromeres and associated pericentric chromatin, we investigated the distribution of macroH2A on metaphase chromosomes (Fig. 4). We found that metaphase centromeres of CpG-demethylated chromosomes exhibited increased signals for macroH2A (Fig. 4B) as compared to normally methylated chromosomes prepared from wild-type cells (Fig. 4A). In addition, we performed combined macroH2A/CREST immunofluorescence on J1 and C/C cells and identified mitotic cells. We found that the macroH2A immunostaining pattern was immediately adjacent to CREST kinetochore staining only in demethylated Dnmt1C/C cells (Fig. 4C).
|
MacroH2A content in demethylated nuclease-resistant chromatin
The above results suggested that heterochromatin acquires a substantial content of macroH2A when CpG methylation levels are significantly reduced. We therefore conducted chromatin analyses using a cell fractionation approach based on nuclease accessibility (Fig. 5A). We isolated nuclei from wild-type, Dnmt1C/C and B9 cells, and infused them with micrococcal nuclease, which cleaves chromatin between nucleosomes. After nearly complete nuclease digestion was achieved, nuclease activity was quenched with EDTA and soluble chromatin was forced from nuclei into the supernatant by hypotonic treatment (extraction 1). We isolated the DNA from extraction 1 and found that it contained primarily mononucleosomes (Fig. 5B). A second hypotonic extraction was enriched in nuclease-resistant chromatin as judged by the presence of polynucleosome ladders (Fig. 5B, extraction 2). Chromatin from cells of each Dnmt1 genotype digested with similar efficiencies. Protein from each chromatin sample was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie Blue staining. The majority of the protein in these samples consisted of histones (Fig. 5C), although the pattern of non-histone auxiliary bands differed between nuclease-sensitive and nuclease-resistant fractions. We subjected identical amounts of chromatin proteins from each fraction to western blotting for HP1 and macroH2A (Fig. 5D). We found increased amounts of macroH2A in chromatin from CpG hypomethylated cell lines, and this effect was most pronounced in samples with highest resistance to micrococcal nuclease. In contrast, HP1 levels were insensitive to the state of DNA methylation. We therefore conclude that loss of DNA CpG methylation leads to an increase in macroH2A in demethylated, nuclease-resistant chromatin fractions.
|
Analysis of post-translational histone modifications in wild-type and demethylated ES cells
Because demethylation caused alteration of macroH2A distribution in ES cells, we performed experiments to investigate other histone features to see if they, too, would respond to reduced levels of DNA methylation. We first performed a series of western blots of total protein extracted from wild-type and Dnmt1C/C to screen for major changes in histone content or modification status of histones (Fig. 6). To do this, equal amounts of protein from wild-type (J1) and DnmtC/C cells were used. We confirmed that protein loading was equal both by Coomassie Blue staining of total protein and western blots of identically loaded lanes using an antibody specific for histone H2B. Similar blots showed that macroH2A protein is slightly more abundant in Dnmt1C/C cells than in wild-type cells. We found that trimethyl modifications of histones H3 at lysines 27, 9 and 4 exhibited little or no change in overall levels in response to demethylation.
|
We also investigated the distribution of methyl modifications at a subnuclear level through immunofluorescence analysis (Fig. 7). Trimethyl-H3K27 is a modified histone found predominantly in facultative heterochromatin (Cao et al., 2002; Plath et al., 2003
). We found a finely particulate diffuse nuclear staining of trimethyl-H3K27 in both wild-type and Dnmt1C/C ES cells (Fig. 7A). A very diffuse nuclear distribution was observed for trimethyl-H3K4 (a modification enriched in euchromatin, (Santos-Rosa et al., 2002
). The localization of trimethyl-H3K4 was also unperturbed by demethylation of DNA (Fig. 7B). Trimethyl-H3K9 is a modified histone found predominantly in constitutive heterochromatin, especially in pericentric chromatin (Maison et al., 2002
; Peters et al., 2001
). We assessed the localization of trimethyl-H3K9 in wild-type and Dnmt1C/C ES cells and observed little or no response to demethylation of DNA for this modification (Fig. 7C). We counted cells from each experiment and determined the proportion with diffuse nuclear versus punctate chromocenter staining (Table 1). Only macroH2A was redistributed from one class to another.
|
|
Demethylation-induced chromatin remodeling in somatic cells
Unlike somatic cells, ES cells remain viable even when CpG methylation is extensively reduced (Li et al., 1992), a feature that allowed the above studies to be performed on viable cells. However, we wished to investigate whether loss of CpG methylation affects macroH2A in differentiated cells. To do this, we conducted experiments using mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) that harbor homozygous conditional alleles of Dnmt1 in which exons 4 and 5 are flanked by loxP sites (Jackson-Grusby et al., 2001
). T-antigen (T-Ag)-transformed derivatives of these MEFs remain viable after viral delivery of cre recombinase to induce recombination of the floxed Dnmt1 exons. We exposed T-Ag-transformed conditional MEF lines to virus alone (Fig. 8A,C) or virus expressing cre recombinase (Fig. 8B,D). We found that conditional loss of Dnmt1 in these MEFs led to a redistribution of the macroH2A signal similar to that observed in ES cells. Specifically, macroH2A formed foci coincident with demethylated pericentric DNA as indicated by intense DAPI and CREST staining (Fig. 6B,D). We observed this dramatic redistribution in two of four conditional MEF lines examined. The two responsive MEF lines proved to be male, as judged by PCR to detect Y chromosomal sequences (Jackson-Grusby et al., 2001
). In contrast, a female MEF line called X17 failed to exhibit demethylation-induced redistribution of macroH2A (Fig. 8E,F), although these cells contained distinctive macrochromatin bodies corresponding to the positions of inactive X chromosomes (Costanzi and Pehrson, 1998
) and lacked Y chromosomes, as judged by Y-specific PCR. A second female MEF line containing conditional genotype for Dnmt1 also failed to exhibit a redistribution of macroH2A in response to demethylation. Though this possible sex-dependent effect on chromatin dynamics is intriguing, these MEF cell lines may harbor other differences that we presently do not understand. Nonetheless, the results indicate that demethylation-induced chromatin reorganization involving macroH2A can occur in somatic cells.
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Two possible mechanisms might explain our findings. (1) Loss of DNA methylation may cause a decondensation of heterochromatin at pericentric regions, leading to the unmasking of macroH2A epitopes that are inaccessible in fully-methylated cells. (2) Loss of DNA methylation may induce a chromatin-remodeling event that causes increased macroH2A to become incorporated into demethylated pericentric heterochromatin. We cannot formally rule out the first mechanism, and indeed, several results suggest that chromatin remodeling may be involved. First, we found increased macroH2A signal on demethylated centromeres of metaphase chromosomes (Fig. 4). We also found that macroH2A protein is enriched in nuclease-resistant demethylated chromatin (Fig. 5D), and that other anti-histone antibodies detect no significant differences in chromatin patterns when wild-type and Dnmt1C/C cells are compared (Fig. 7). Together, these findings suggest that demethylation-induced unmasking of macroH2A epitopes is not likely to account for the observations. In either case, the results indicate that a close connection exists between DNA methylation and the structure of ES cell centromeres.
Heterochromatin is often classified into one of two types constitutive (obligately silenced, such as pericentric heterochromatin), and facultative (contextually silenced). Perhaps the best-studied example of facultative heterochromatin is the inactive X chromosome (Xi) of female placental mammals. In mice and humans, the chromatin of Xi is characterized by its association with the untranslated Xist RNA and the presence of abundant macroH2A protein (Costanzi and Pehrson, 1998). Many studies have shown that CpG islands of X-linked genes subject to X-inactivation are highly methylated. However, promoter-proximal CpG islands make up only a small portion of available CpG dinucleotides on the X chromosome, and experiments that address global methylation levels on X chromosomes show that the inactive X chromosome is markedly undermethylated relative to the active X chromosome (Bernardino et al., 1996
; Viegas-Pequignot et al., 1988
).
Our results show that loss of CpG demethylation leads to the establishment of pericentric chromatin with features reminiscent of the inactive X chromosome, namely, low levels of CpG DNA methylation combined with a high content of macroH2A. This finding raises the interesting possibility that DNA methylation can act as a toggle between facultative and constitutive heterochromatin. This intriguing possibility led us to investigate the behavior of other chromatin constituents of euchromatin and facultative and constitutive heterochromatin by both western blot analysis and immunofluorescence. We found that trimethyl-H3K27, which is a marker of facultative heterochromatin (Cao et al., 2002; Plath et al., 2003
), and trimethyl-H3K9, which is a marker of constitutive heterochromatin (Maison et al., 2002
; Peters et al., 2001
), were both essentially unaffected by loss of Dnmt1 function. We also found that trimethyl-H3K4, which is a marker of euchromatin (Santos-Rosa et al., 2002
), was unaffected by loss of Dnmt1 function. These results show that macroH2A is relatively unique in its ability to respond to reductions in levels of DNA methylation. The finding that macroH2A but not trimethyl-H3K27 was affected in demethylated cells suggested that additional complexities may exist in the interplay between DNA methylation and facultative heterochromatin organization.
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
![]() |
Footnotes |
---|
Present address: Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Allen, M. D., Buckle, A. M., Cordell, S. C., Lowe, J. and Bycroft, M. (2003). The crystal structure of AF1521 a protein from Archaeoglobus fulgidus with homology to the non-histone domain of macroH2A. J. Mol. Biol. 330, 503-511.[CrossRef][Medline]
Angelov, D., Molla, A., Perche, P. Y., Hans, F., Cote, J., Khochbin, S., Bouvet, P. and Dimitrov, S. (2003). The histone variant macroH2A interferes with transcription factor binding and SWI/SNF nucleosome remodeling. Mol. Cell 11, 1033-1041.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bannister, A. J., Zegerman, P., Partridge, J. F., Miska, E. A., Thomas, J. O., Allshire, R. C. and Kouzarides, T. (2001). Selective recognition of methylated lysine 9 on histone H3 by the HP1 chromo domain. Nature 410, 120-124.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bernardino, J., Lamoliatte, E., Lombard, M., Niveleau, A., Malfoy, B., Dutrillaux, B. and Bourgeois, C. A. (1996). DNA methylation of the X chromosomes of the human female: an in situ semi-quantitative analysis. Chromosoma 104, 528-535.[CrossRef][Medline]
Biniszkiewicz, D., Gribnau, J., Ramsahoye, B., Gaudet, F., Eggan, K., Humpherys, D., Mastrangelo, M. A., Jun, Z., Walter, J. and Jaenisch, R. (2002). Dnmt1 overexpression causes genomic hypermethylation, loss of imprinting, and embryonic lethality. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 2124-2135.
Brenner, S., Pepper, D., Berns, M. W., Tan, E. and Brinkley, B. R. (1981). Kinetochore structure, duplication, and distribution in mammalian cells: analysis by human autoantibodies from scleroderma patients. J. Cell Biol. 91, 95-102.[Abstract]
Cao, R., Wang, L., Wang, H., Xia, L., Erdjument-Bromage, H., Tempst, P., Jones, R. S. and Zhang, Y. (2002). Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in Polycomb-group silencing. Science 298, 1039-1043.
Costanzi, C. and Pehrson, J. R. (1998). Histone macroH2A1 is concentrated in the inactive X chromosome of female mammals. Nature 393, 599-601.[CrossRef][Medline]
Costanzi, C., Stein, P., Worrad, D. M., Schultz, R. M. and Pehrson, J. R. (2000). Histone macroH2A1 is concentrated in the inactive X chromosome of female preimplantation mouse embryos. Development 127, 2283-2289.
Frorath, B., Abney, C. C., Berthold, H., Scanarini, M. and Northemann, W. (1992). Production of recombinant rat interleukin-6 in Escherichia coli using a novel highly efficient expression vector pGEX-3T. Biotechniques 12, 558-563.[Medline]
Hoyer-Fender, S., Czirr, E., Radde, R., Turner, J. M., Mahadevaiah, S. K., Pehrson, J. R. and Burgoyne, P. S. (2004). Localisation of histone macroH2A1.2 to the XY-body is not a response to the presence of asynapsed chromosome axes. J. Cell Sci. 117, 189-198.
Jackson-Grusby, L., Beard, C., Possemato, R., Tudor, M., Fambrough, D., Csankovszki, G., Dausman, J., Lee, P., Wilson, C., Lander, E. et al. (2001). Loss of genomic methylation causes p53-dependent apoptosis and epigenetic deregulation. Nat. Genet. 27, 31-39.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jacobs, S. A. and Khorasanizadeh, S. (2002). Structure of HP1 chromodomain bound to a lysine 9-methylated histone H3 tail. Science 295, 2080-2083.
Jacobs, S. A., Taverna, S. D., Zhang, Y., Briggs, S. D., Li, J., Eissenberg, J. C., Allis, C. D. and Khorasanizadeh, S. (2001). Specificity of the HP1 chromo domain for the methylated N-terminus of histone H3. EMBO J. 20, 5232-5241.
Lachner, M., O'Carroll, D., Rea, S., Mechtler, K. and Jenuwein, T. (2001). Methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 creates a binding site for HP1 proteins. Nature 410, 116-120.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ladurner, A. G. (2003). Inactivating chromosomes: a macro domain that minimizes transcription. Mol. Cell 12, 1-3.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lei, H., Oh, S. P., Okano, M., Juttermann, R., Goss, K. A., Jaenisch, R. and Li, E. (1996). De novo DNA cytosine methyltransferase activities in mouse embryonic stem cells. Development 122, 3195-3205.
Leonhardt, H., Page, A. W., Weier, H. U. and Bestor, T. H. (1992). A targeting sequence directs DNA methyltransferase to sites of DNA replication in mammalian nuclei. Cell 71, 865-873.[CrossRef][Medline]
Li, E., Bestor, T. H. and Jaenisch, R. (1992). Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality. Cell 69, 915-926.[CrossRef][Medline]
Li, E., Beard, C., Forster, A. C., Bestor, T. H. and Jaenisch, R. (1993). DNA methylation, genomic imprinting, and mammalian development. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 58, 297-305.[Medline]
Maison, C., Bailly, D., Peters, A. H., Quivy, J. P., Roche, D., Taddei, A., Lachner, M., Jenuwein, T. and Almouzni, G. (2002). Higher-order structure in pericentric heterochromatin involves a distinct pattern of histone modification and an RNA component. Nat. Genet. 30, 329-334.[CrossRef][Medline]
Palmer, D. K., O'Day, K., Wener, M. H., Andrews, B. S. and Margolis, R. L. (1987). A 17-kD centromere protein (CENP-A) copurifies with nucleosome core particles and with histones. J. Cell Biol. 104, 805-815.[Abstract]
Pehrson, J. R. and Fried, V. A. (1992). MacroH2A, a core histone containing a large nonhistone region. Science 257, 1398-1400.[Medline]
Peters, A. H., O'Carroll, D., Scherthan, H., Mechtler, K., Sauer, S., Schofer, C., Weipoltshammer, K., Pagani, M., Lachner, M., Kohlmaier, A. et al. (2001). Loss of the Suv39h histone methyltransferases impairs mammalian heterochromatin and genome stability. Cell 107, 323-337.[CrossRef][Medline]
Plath, K., Fang, J., Mlynarczyk-Evans, S. K., Cao, R., Worringer, K. A., Wang, H., de la Cruz, C. C., Otte, A. P., Panning, B. and Zhang, Y. (2003). Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in X inactivation. Science 300, 131-135.
Pradhan, S., Bacolla, A., Wells, R. D. and Roberts, R. J. (1999). Recombinant human DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferase. I. Expression, purification, and comparison of de novo and maintenance methylation. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 33002-33010.
Rasmussen, T. P., Huang, T., Mastrangelo, M. A., Loring, J., Panning, B. and Jaenisch, R. (1999). Messenger RNAs encoding mouse histone macroH2A1 isoforms are expressed at similar levels in male and female cells and result from alternative splicing. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 3685-3689.
Rasmussen, T. P., Mastrangelo, M. A., Eden, A., Pehrson, J. R. and Jaenisch, R. (2000). Dynamic relocalization of histone MacroH2A1 from centrosomes to inactive X chromosomes during X inactivation. J. Cell Biol. 150, 1189-1198.
Rea, S., Eisenhaber, F., O'Carroll, D., Strahl, B. D., Sun, Z. W., Schmid, M., Opravil, S., Mechtler, K., Ponting, C. P., Allis, C. D. et al. (2000). Regulation of chromatin structure by site-specific histone H3 methyltransferases. Nature 406, 593-599.[CrossRef][Medline]
Santos-Rosa, H., Schneider, R., Bannister, A. J., Sherriff, J., Bernstein, B. E., Emre, N. C., Schreiber, S. L., Mellor, J. and Kouzarides, T. (2002). Active genes are tri-methylated at K4 of histone H3. Nature 419, 407-411.[CrossRef][Medline]
Silva, J., Mak, W., Zvetkova, I., Appanah, R., Nesterova, T. B., Webster, Z., Peters, A. H., Jenuwein, T., Otte, A. P. and Brockdorff, N. (2003). Establishment of histone h3 methylation on the inactive X chromosome requires transient recruitment of Eed-Enx1 polycomb group complexes. Dev. Cell 4, 481-495.[CrossRef][Medline]
Thorne, A. W., Cary, P. D. and Crane-Robinson, C. (1998). Extraction and separation of core histones and non-histone chromosomal proteins. In Chromatin: A Practical Approach (ed. H. Gould), pp. 35-57. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Viegas-Pequignot, E., Dutrillaux, B. and Thomas, G. (1988). Inactive X chromosome has the highest concentration of unmethylated Hha I sites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 7657-7660.[Abstract]
Related articles in JCS: