1 Stem Cell Regulation, Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology (KAST), Teikyo University Biotechnology Research Center, 907 Nogawa, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 216-0001, Japan
2 Department of Anatomy, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, 600 16th street, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
3 Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan
4 Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Corporation, Kawaguchi, 332-0012, Japan
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: miyajima{at}ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp)
Accepted 30 September 2004
![]() |
Summary |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Dlk, Laminin, Type IV collagen, Hepatocyte, Cholangiocyte
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Some cytokines are known to affect the growth and differentiation of embryonic hepatic progenitors directly. Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) is critical for the proliferation of hepatic stem cells and hepatoblasts, which is consistent with the expression of c-Met in these cells (Suzuki et al., 2002; Tanimizu et al., 2003
), whereas oncostatin M (OSM) promotes the differentiation of fetal hepatocytes (Ito et al., 2000
; Kamiya et al., 1999
; Matsui et al., 2002
; Minguet et al., 2003
; Suzuki et al., 2003
). In addition to cytokines, cell-cell contacts and extracellular matrices (ECMs) also affect the survival, proliferation and differentiation of hepatic progenitors. In fact, we previously showed that hepatic differentiation is induced by plating fetal hepatocytes at a high density (Kojima et al., 2000
) and also that Engelbreth-Holm-Swarm sarcoma (EHS) gel, a mixture of ECMs, promotes hepatic differentiation induced by OSM (Kamiya et al., 2002
). However, it remains unknown which ECM component controls the growth and differentiation of hepatic progenitors, though laminin, and type I and IV collagen weakly induce the hepatic differentiation of hepatic stem cells (Suzuki et al., 2003
).
The liver and pancreas are closely related organs, as the liver primordium and the ventral pancreas are adjacent to each other in the ventral foregut endoderm at the onset of their organogenesis. In addition, the transdifferentiation between hepatic and pancreatic cells has been shown in vivo and in vitro (Meivar-Levy and Ferber, 2003; Shen et al., 2003
). The transition from pancreas to liver has been addressed by using mouse organ cultures and a pancreatic cell line (Deutsch et al., 2001
; Tosh et al., 2002
), whereas the mechanism underlying the transition from hepatic cells to pancreatic ones is still poorly understood. Thus, establishing an in vitro culture system of immature hepatic and/or pancreatic cells will provide a means for studying this mechanism.
We previously described the isolation of hepatoblasts from fetal liver based on the expression of Dlk, a type I membrane protein, using a specific monoclonal antibody and a cell sorter (Tanimizu et al., 2003). Dlk+ cells efficiently proliferated and exhibited bi-directional differentiation capability in the presence of EGF and HGF in vitro. However, it remained unclear how ECM components affect the growth and differentiation of Dlk+ hepatoblasts. In this paper, we show that some Dlk+ hepatoblasts continuously proliferate on dishes coated with laminin and that the cells expanded on laminin differentiate into both hepatocytes and cholangiocytes under different conditions. Furthermore, we demonstrate that they also express pancreatic genes under specific culture conditions. Thus, multipotential endodermal progenitors can be reproducibly generated from Dlk+ cells by long-term culture on laminin.
![]() |
Materials and Methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Culture of Dlk+ cells
Mouse fetal hepatic cells were obtained according to the method of Kamiya et al. (Kamiya et al., 1999). The method used to isolate Dlk+ hepatoblasts from E14.5 livers was described previously (Tanimizu et al., 2003
) using hamster anti-mouse Dlk monoclonal antibody (mAb) (provided by Kirin Brewery Co. Ltd.) (Kaneta et al., 2000
). Dlk+ cells were resuspended in DMEM/F12 (Sigma, St Louis, MO) containing 10% FBS (Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg, MD), 1x insulin/transferrin/selenium (ITS) (Gibco BRL), 10 mM nicotinamide (Wako, Osaka, Japan), 0.1 µM dexamethasone (Sigma) and 5 mM L-glutamine (Gibco BRL). Cells were plated at 50 cells/cm2 and 200 cells/cm2, on six-well plates coated with either type IV collagen or laminin, respectively, and were incubated with 20 ng/ml of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) (R&D, Minneapolis, MN) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) (PeproTech Ltd., London, UK). After 5, 14 and 21 days of culture, large colonies containing more than 100 cells were enumerated. Student's t-test was performed on Microsoft excel. After 21 days of culture, each large colony was placed within a cloning ring and dissolved in Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) to prepare total RNA.
Immunocytochemistry
To examine the expression of Dlk, cells cultured for 5 days were fixed in PBS containing 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with methanol. They were incubated with hamster anti-Dlk mAb. Signals were visualized by incubation with biotinylated anti-hamster IgG (Vector) and FITC-conjugated streptavidin (Pharmingen, Peapack, NJ). To evaluate bidirectional differentiation of Dlk+ cells, the colonies on the plates after 5 days of culture were incubated with 2 µg/ml goat anti-mouse albumin antibody (Bethyl Laboratory, Montgomery, TX) and rabbit anti-mouse CK19 serum diluted 1000-fold (Tanimizu et al., 2003) after fixation with paraformaldehyde and permeabilization with methanol. Signals were visualized using Cy3-conjugated anti-goat IgG and FITC-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Rockland, Gilbertsville, PA) under a Nikon Eclipse E800 fluorescence microscope. Cells that strongly expressed albumin were visualized as orange instead of red in our experiments.
Subconfluent HPPL were detached from plates with trypsin/EDTA. They were mounted on glass slides by cytospinning and then incubated with anti-CK19 serum and anti-mouse albumin antibody. Signals were visualized using Alexa Fluor 488 anti-rabbit IgG and Alexa Fluor 555 anti-goat IgG (Molecular Probes) under a fluorescence microscope.
Flow cytometry
To examine the expression of Dlk, cultured cells were detached from plates with trypsin/EDTA (Gibco BRL) and fixed in PBS containing 4% paraformaldehyde. After a wash with PBS, the cells were incubated with anti-Dlk mAb and subsequently incubated with FITC-conjugated anti-hamster IgG (Vector). To determine the expression of Ki67, cultured cells were fixed and permeabilized, and then incubated with mouse anti-human Ki67 mAb (Pharmingen, Peapack, NJ) followed by the incubation with FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (KPL). To detect the expression of integrin ß1 (CD29) and integrin 6 (CD49f), cultured cells were incubated with FITC-conjugated anti-CD29 and PE-conjugated anti-CD49f mAbs (Pharmingen). After a wash with PBS, the expression of Dlk, Ki67 or CD29 and CD49f was examined using FACScaliber (BD).
Differentiation of HPPL into three different lineages
E14.5 Dlk+ cells were kept on laminin-coated dishes for 2 months by supplying fresh medium every 4 days. After 2 months, the cells were dissociated from plates with trypsin/EDTA and passaged onto new plates coated with laminin every 4 days. Cells grown under these conditions were named HPPL (hepatic progenitor cells proliferating on laminin). After replating four to six times, HPPL were treated with various conditions to induce multi-directional differentiation. In order to assure that different culture conditions definitely induce differentiation but do not promote proliferation of a certain cell population, confluent HPPL were stimulated to differentiate by changing the medium.
For the induction of hepatic differentiation, HPPL were plated at a density of 2x105 cells/well on six-well plates coated with laminin. When the cells became confluent, the medium was changed to 2 ml fresh DMEM/F12 supplemented with 20 ng/ml oncostatin M (OSM). After 5 days of incubation, 300 µl EHS gel mixed with six volumes of DMEM/F12 was added to each well according to a published method (Kamiya et al., 2002). After an additional 5 days of incubation, cells were dissolved in Trizol reagent and used for gene expression analysis. The intracellular accumulation of polysaccharide was examined with PAS staining solution (Muto Pure Chemical, Tokyo, Japan) according to the standard protocol after removal of the EHS gel and fixing the cells in 4% paraformaldehyde. Activity of ammonia detoxification was also examined. After treatment with OSM and EHS gel, the layer of EHS gel was removed by a wash with PBS. Then, 2 ml fresh DMEM containing 2 mM NH4Cl was added to the cells. After 24 and 48 hours of incubation, the concentration of ammonium ions was measured by the modified indo-phenol method using a commercial kit, Ammonia-test Wako (Wako).
For the induction of cholangiocytic differentiation, HPPL were cultured in collagen gel. To make collagen gel plates, 1 ml collagen gel solution, consisting of 800 µl Collagen type I-A (Nitta gelatin), 100 µl 10x DMEM and 100 µl of 200 mM HEPES buffer containing 2.2% sodium bicarbonate and 0.05 N NaOH, was added to each well of six-well plates and was incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes. HPPL (1x105 cells) resuspended in 1 ml DMEM/F12 were mixed with 1 ml of the collagen gel solution and plated onto the basal layer of collagen. After 30 minutes of incubation at 37°C, 2 ml DMEM supplemented with 20 ng/ml of HGF was added to the well. To harvest the cells from the collagen gel, the gel was cut into cubes of 3 mm with a knife and mixed with 1/50 volume of 1% type I-A collagenase (Sigma) solution. After 30 minutes of incubation at 37°C with gentle shaking, the cells were collected by centrifugation and dissolved in Trizol reagent to prepare total RNA. To examine the protein expression of CK19, collagen gels were treated with collagenase and then the cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. After blocking, the cells were incubated with anti-CK19 serum and then incubated with Alexa Fluor 488 anti-rabbit IgG. (Molecular Probes). The samples were examined under a Zeiss Confocal Microscope.
For the induction of pancreatic differentiation, HPPL were plated at a density of 2x105 cells/well on six-well plates and incubated for 2 days until confluent. Then, dexamethasone and ITS were depleted from the medium and 20 ng/ml HGF and 2 µM retinoic acid were added. After an additional 5 days of incubation, the cells were dissolved in Trizol reagent and used for preparation of total RNA.
Microarray analysis
Total RNA samples were isolated from E14.5 Dlk+ cells and HPPL. The first strand was synthesized with Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) in the presence of [35S]dCTP (Amersham). Uptake of 35S into cDNA was measured with a liquid scintillation counter. The membranes spotted with mouse gene fragments were incubated with hybridization buffer containing the cDNA and tet-1 probe labeled with [35S]dCTP at 68°C for 12 hours. As an internal control, the ratio of 35S counts between the tet-1 probe and each cDNA sample was adjusted to 1:2000. After washing and drying the membranes, they were exposed to an imaging plate for 3 days and then signals on the plate were detected with FLA-3000. The levels of gene expression were quantified using VersArray Analyzer program.
Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
cDNA was synthesized from 1 µg total RNA prepared from cell lysates. One-thirtieth of the cDNA was used for PCR. The thermal cycle (denaturation at 94°C for 30 seconds, annealing at the temperature set for each pair of primers for 30 seconds and extension at 72°C for 1 minute) was used to amplify each DNA fragment. The primers used are listed in Table 1.
|
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
|
|
|
Long-term culture of Dlk+ hepatoblasts
Although the colonies on either ECM contained both albumin+ cells and CK19+ cells, Dlk+ cells formed more colonies (with more than 100 cells) on type IV collagen than on laminin 5 days after plating (Fig. 3A,B). Thus, type IV collagen supports growth of hepatoblasts more effectively at least in the short term when compared with laminin. In spite of the vigorous growth of Dlk+ cells on type IV collagen during the first 5 days of culture, the proliferation declined on type IV collagen as shown by the reduction in the number of large colonies that were present on the 5th day after plating, and many cells had died by day 21 (Fig. 3A). In contrast, some of the medium-sized colonies on laminin observed on the 5th day continued to expand and became large colonies by day 14 (red in Fig. 3B) and by day 21 (yellow in Fig. 3B). Even at day 21, about 20% of the cells on laminin proliferated as shown by Ki67 expression (Fig. 3C, panel 3), whereas most cells on collagen did not express Ki67 (Fig. 3C, panel 2). Furthermore, cells cultured on laminin grew continuously for more than one month (Fig. 3D) and proliferated efficiently even after replating, indicating that those cells maintained high proliferation potential as long as they were cultured on laminin-coated dishes. We named these cells HPPL (hepatic progenitor cells proliferating on laminin). Consistent with the fact that HPPL were established on laminin, integrin 6ß1, a receptor for laminin, was expressed on their surfaces as shown by FACS analysis (Fig. 4A, panel 2). In contrast to hepatoblasts, HPPL did not express Dlk (Fig. 4B, panel 2).
|
|
To compare HPPL with E14.5 Dlk+ hepatoblasts, we examined their gene expression patterns by using a microarray technique. We first checked the expression pattern of hepatic and cholangiocyte markers. The data showed that HPPL expressed a hepatic lineage marker, albumin, but not hepatic differentiation markers, such as CPS, tyrosine aminotransferase (TAT), and tryptophan oxygenase (TO) in a manner similar to hepatoblasts. However, in contrast to hepatoblasts, HPPL expressed a cholangiocyte marker, CK19. The expression of CK19 and albumin were further examined by immunocytochemical analysis that showed most HPPL expressed both CK19 and albumin (Fig. 4C). We also found several genes differentially expressed in HPPL and hepatoblasts and confirmed their expression by RT-PCR. Consistent with the continuous growth capability of HPPL, transforming growth factor (TGF
), a possible autocrine growth factor, and p57, a negative regulator for cell cycle progression, were upregulated and downregulated in HPPL, respectively when compared to expression in Dlk+ hepatoblasts (Fig. 4D).
HPPL differentiate into multi-lineage cells
We cultured HPPL in three different conditions to test the differentiation potential of HPPL. In order to clarify that each culture condition affects the differentiation of HPPL but does not promote the growth of a certain cell population, HPPL were grown for 3 days after plating to reach confluence and then treated under different conditions.
First, in order to examine the hepatic differentiation potential, we cultured HPPL with OSM, which induces hepatic differentiation in vitro (Kamiya et al., 1999). By day 5 of the incubation with OSM, hepatic differentiation was induced slightly as shown by weak expression of TAT (Fig. 5A, panel 1). As the differentiation of fetal hepatic cells is further promoted by EHS gel (Kamiya et al., 2002
), HPPL treated with OSM for 5 days were overlaid with EHS gel and maintained for an additional 5 days. Under these conditions, the expression of TAT and CPS was significantly induced (Fig. 5A, panel 1), although they were also expressed without pretreatment with OSM (data not shown). In addition, EHS gel induced the formation of clusters of cells with a round nucleus and granulated cytoplasm, characteristics of mature hepatocytes (Fig. 5A, panel 3), whereas such cells were not observed before induction of hepatic differentiation (panel 2). To evaluate the metabolic functions of HPPL, we examined the accumulation of polysaccharides such as glycogen using PAS staining and found that HPPL significantly accumulated intracellular polysaccharides upon treatment with OSM and EHS gel (Fig. 5B, panel 2) when compared with the control cells (panel 1). We also examined the cellular activity of ammonia detoxification before and after hepatic differentiation. The addition of EHS gel conferred the ability to eliminate ammonia quickly from the culture medium to HPPL (Fig. 5C).
|
Next, to induce cholangiocytic characteristics, HPPL were cultured in type I collagen gel. Cholangiocyte markers, CK7, CK19, and integrin ß4, were detected in HPPL before the induction of cholangiocyte differentiation as shown by microarray analysis, and the level of their expression was not promoted even in collagen gel (Fig. 5D). On the other hand, in collagen gel, HPPL showed tube-like structures, which were immunostained with anti-CK19 antibody (Fig. 5E). The morphological change in HPPL under these culture conditions suggested that they have the potential to differentiate into cholangiocytes.
Finally, we tried to induce the pancreatic differentiation of HPPL as it is postulated that hepatoblasts and pancreatic progenitors are derived from the same endodermal stem cells (Deutsch et al., 2001) and transdifferentiation from hepatocytes to pancreatic cells and vice versa has been reported. In the transdifferentiation processes, dexamethasone promotes the transition from a pancreatic to a hepatic lineage (Tosh et al., 2002
). In addition, retinoic acid is known to play an important role in pancreatic differentiation (Kumar and Melton, 2003
). Therefore, to induce pancreatic differentiation, we depleted dexamethasone from the culture medium and added retinoic acid when the HPPL became confluent. After 5 days of incubation, the expression of Pdx1, a transcription factor involved in pancreatic organogenesis, was detected by RT-PCR (Fig. 6). Furthermore, the gene expression of pancreatic proteins such as insulin, glucagon, and lipase, was also promoted. Taken together, these results show that HPPL generated from Dlk+ hepatoblasts, are able to differentiate into hepatocytes, cholangiocytes and pancreatic cells depending on the culture conditions.
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
We were able to generate HPPL reproducibly from the long-term culture of Dlk+ cells on laminin. As compared with hepatoblasts, HPPL efficiently proliferate even after replating. It could be postulated that this continuous growth capability is attributed to pro-growth signals and/or anti-apoptotic signals. Microarray analysis showed that TGF and p57 were upregulated and downregulated, respectively, in HPPL compared with Dlk+ hepatoblasts. TGF
is known as a growth factor that promotes the proliferation of hepatocytes during liver regeneration. Although it has not been demonstrated that TGF
supports the growth of hepatic progenitors, it is a candidate driving the proliferation of HPPL in an autocrine manner. In addition, downregulation of p57, a cdk inhibitor that inhibits cell cycle progression, might result in the continuous growth of HPPL. In contrast, we did not find upregulation of anti-apoptotic genes such as Bcl-2 and Bcl-X. However, as HPPL were not exposed to apoptotic signals, upregulation of anti-apoptotic genes might not be necessary for HPPL to proliferate. Taken together, the continuous proliferative capability of HPPL is probably dependent on pro-growth signals rather than on anti-apoptotic factors.
HPPL are mostly Dlk-CK19+albumin+, whereas hepatoblasts are Dlk+CK19-albumin+, suggesting that HPPL do not exhibit exactly the same characteristics as hepatoblasts. However, HPPL possess not only a highly proliferative capability but also the potential to differentiate into hepatocytes and cholangiocytes. Although OSM weakly induced hepatic differentiation of HPPL, EHS gel significantly induced hepatic differentiation of HPPL as well as that of hepatoblasts. Furthermore, in type I collagen gel, HPPL formed tube-like structures that were stained with anti-CK19 antibody (Fig. 5E) in a manner similar to Dlk+ hepatoblasts (data not shown). These observations indicate that HPPL and Dlk+ hepatoblasts share a bi-directional differentiation potential elicited by external signals. Thus, HPPL provide a valuable means to study the mechanism of hepatic and cholangiocytic differentiation.
Interestingly, HPPL also differentiated into pancreatic cells. Consistent with the report that dexamethasone induces the transition from pancreas to liver (Tosh et al., 2002), depletion of dexamethasone from the culture significantly induced the expression of Pdx1 in HPPL. Furthermore, the addition of retinoic acid enhanced the expression of pancreatic genes, although it did not induce the expression of pancreatic genes in the presence of dexamethasone (data not shown). Two previous reports provide important insights into the mechanism of the transition of pancreatic cells into hepatocytes. First, the cells in the ventral foregut endoderm tend to become pancreatic cells whereas the signal from the cardiac mesoderm directs the hepatic fate (Deutsch et al., 2001
). Second, C/EBPß was shown to control the transition from pancreatic to hepatic cells (Tosh et al., 2002
). However, the mechanism underlying the transition from hepatic to pancreatic cells remains unclear. Similar to HPPL, it was reported that H-CFUCs derived from CD45-TER119-cKit-cMet+CD49+/low fetal hepatic cells differentiate not only into two hepatic lineages but also into the pancreatic lineage (Suzuki et al., 2002
). These hepatic progenitor cells with the ability to differentiate into pancreatic cells will provide a useful model to understand the mechanism underlying the lineage commitment of foregut endoderm and the transition from liver to pancreas.
As HPPL could be established on laminin but not on collagen or fibronectin, laminin is a critical factor to maintain the proliferation and multi-differentiation potential of HPPL. Because of the strong expression of integrin 6ß1, a receptor for laminin, on HPPL, signals from laminin might be transmitted through integrin ß1. However, as it was reported that the effect of laminin was not mediated through the integrin ß1 subunit in some cases (Li et al., 2002
), it remains unclear what signaling pathways are involved in the laminin-induced long-term proliferation of HPPL. In the liver, basement membranes including laminin are present around periportal biliary trees in addition to blood vessels. The hepatic portal area is considered the place where hepatic stem cells reside. Oval cells, the progeny of hepatic stem cells, emerge from the canal of Hering in the regenerating liver of rats treated with 2-acetylaminofluoren and subjected to partial hepatectomy. Interestingly, laminin is accumulated around oval cells whereas it is not found in the area where quiescent mature hepatocytes exist (Paku et al., 2001
). It is thus tempting to speculate that laminin contributes to maintaining the hepatic stem cell population in the quiescent liver whereas it supports the proliferation of oval cells in the regenerating liver.
Our results indicate that the long-term culture of hepatoblasts on laminin produces HPPL that have high proliferative and multi-differentiation potentials. Although it remains unknown how laminin maintains HPPL in an immature state, laminin is an important ECM component for the long-term culture of hepatic progenitors. Furthermore, HPPL can be induced to differentiate into hepatocytes with metabolic functions. Thus, HPPL might be useful not only for studying the mechanisms underlying cell fate decision among hepatocytes, cholangiocytes and pancreatic cells, but also for expanding functional hepatocytes in vitro.
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Deutsch, G., Jung, J., Zheng, M., Lora, J. and Zaret, K. S. (2001). A bipotential precursor population for pancreas and liver within the embryonic endoderm. Development 128, 871-881.
Fausto, N. and Campbell, J. S. (2003). The role of hepatocytes and oval cells in liver regeneration and repopulation. Mech. Dev. 120, 117-130.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ito, Y., Matsui, T., Kamiya, A., Kinoshita, T. and Miyajima, A. (2000). Retroviral gene transfer of signaling molecules into murine fetal hepatocytes defines distinct roles for the STAT3 and Ras pathway during hepatic development. Hepatology 32, 1370-1376.[Medline]
Kamiya, A., Kinoshita, T., Ito, Y., Matsui, T., Morikawa, Y., Senda, E., Nakashima, K., Taga, T., Yoshida, K., Kishimoto, T. et al. (1999). Fetal liver development requires a paracrine action of oncostatin M through the gp130 signal transducer. EMBO J. 18, 2127-2136.
Kamiya, A., Kojima, N., Kinoshita, T., Sakai, Y. and Miyajima, A. (2002). Maturation of fetal hepatocytes in vitro by extracellular matrices and oncostatin M: Induction of tryptophan oxygenase. Hepatology 35, 1351-1359.[Medline]
Kaneta, M., Osawa, M., Osawa, M., Sudo, K., Nakauchi, H., Farr, A. G. and Takahama, Y. (2000). A role for Pref-1 and HES-1 in thymocyte development. J. Immunol. 164, 256-264.
Kojima, N., Kinoshita, T., Kamiya, A., Nakamura, K., Nakashima, K., Taga, T. and Miyajima, A. (2000). Cell density-dependent regulation of hepatic development by a gp130-independent pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 277, 152-158.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kubota, H. and Reid, L. M. (2000). Clonogenic hepatoblasts, common precursors for hepatocytic and biliary lineages, are lacking classical major histocompatibility complex class I antigen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 12132-12137.
Kumar, M. and Melton, D. (2003). Pancreas specification: a budding question. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 13, 401-407.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lazaro, C. A., Croager, E. J., Mitchell, C., Campbell, J. S., Yu, C., Foraker, J., Rhim, J. A., Yeoh, G. C. and Fausto, N. (2003). Establishment, characterization, and long-term maintenance of cultures of human fetal hepatocytes. Hepatology 58, 1095-1106.[CrossRef]
Li, S., Harrison, D., Carbonetto, S., Fassler, R., Smyth, N., Edgar, D. and Yurchenco, P. D. (2002). Matrix assembly, regulation, and survival functions of laminin and its receptors in embryonic stem cell differentiation. J. Cell Biol. 157, 1279-1290.
Matsui, T., Kinoshita, T., Morikawa, Y., Tohya, K., Katsuki, M., Ito, Y., Kamiya, A. and Miyajima, A. (2002). K-Ras mediates cytokine-induced formation of E-cadherin-based adherens junctions duringliver development. EMBO J. 21, 1021-1030.
Meivar-Levy, I. and Ferber, S. (2003). New organs from our own tissues: liver-to-pancreas transdifferentiation. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 14, 460-466.[CrossRef][Medline]
Minguet, S., Cortegano, I., Gonzalo, P., Martinez-Marin, J. A., de Andres, B., Salas, C., Melero, D., Gaspar, M. L. and Marcos, M. A. (2003). A population of c-Kit(low)(CD45/TER119)-hepatic cell progenitors of 11-day postcoitus mouse embryo liver reconstitutes cell-depleted liver organoids. J. Clin. Invest. 112, 1152-1163.
Paku, S., Schnur, J., Nagy, P. and Thorgeirsson, S. S. (2001). Origin and structural evolution of the early proliferating oval cells in rat liver. Am. J. Pathol. 158, 1313-1323.
Rogler, L. E. (1997). Selective bipotential differentiation of mouse embryonic hepatoblasts in vitro. Am. J. Pathol. 150, 591-602.[Abstract]
Shen, C. N., Horb, M. E., Slack, J. M. and Tosh, D. (2003). Transdifferentiation of pancreas to liver. Mech. Dev. 120, 107-116.[CrossRef][Medline]
Shiojiri, N. (1984). The origin of intrahepatic bile duct cells in the mouse. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 79, 25-39.[Medline]
Shiojiri, N., Lemire, J. M. and Fausto, N. (1991). Cell lineages and oval cell progenitors in rat liver development. Cancer Res. 51, 2611-2620.[Abstract]
Spagnoli, F. M., Amicone, L., Tripodi, M. and Weinss, M. C. (1998). Identification of a bipotential precursor cell in hepatic cell lines derived from transgenic mice expressing cyto-Met in the liver. J. Cell Biol. 143, 1101-1112.
Strick-Marchand, H. and Weiss, M. C. (2002). Inducible differentiation and morphogenesis of bipotential liver cell lines from wild-type mouse embryos. Hepatology 36, 794-804.[Medline]
Suzuki, A., Zheng, Y.-E., Kondo, R., Kusakabe, M., Takada, Y., Fukao, K., Nakauchi, H. and Taniguchi, H. (2000). Flow-cytometric separation and enrichment of hepatic progenitor cells in the developing mouse liver. Hepatology 32, 1230-1239.[Medline]
Suzuki, A., Zheng, Y., Kaneko, S., Onodera, M., Fukao, K., Nakauchi, H. and Taniguchi, H. (2002). Clonal identification and characterization of self-renewing pluripotent stem cells in the developing liver. J. Cell Biol. 156, 173-184.
Suzuki, A., Iwama, A., Miyashita, H., Nakauchi, H. and Taniguchi, H. (2003). Role for growth factors and extracellular matrix in controlling differentiation of prospectively isolated hepatic stem cells. Development 130, 2513-2524.
Tanimizu, N., Nishikawa, M., Saito, H., Tsujimura, T. and Miyajima, A. (2003). Isolation of hepatoblasts based on the expression of Dlk/Pref-1. J. Cell Sci. 116, 1775-1786.
Tosh, D., Shen, C. N. and Slack, J. M. (2002). Differentiated properties of hepatocytes induced from pancreatic cells. Hepatology 36, 534-543.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zaret, K. (2000). Liver specification and early morphogenesis. Mech. Dev. 92, 83-88.[CrossRef][Medline]
|