1 Structures et Propriétés des Architectures Moléculaires (UMR 5919 CNRS), Département de Recherche Fondamentale sur la Matière Condensée, CEA-Grenoble, DRFMC/SI3M, 17 rue des Martyrs, 38054 Grenoble Cedex 09, France
2 Image Analysis & Computer Graphics, Informatics and Mathematical Modelling, Technical University of Denmark, Richard Petersens Plads, Building 321, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
3 Laboratoire de Biochimie et Biophysique des Systèmes Intégrés (UMR 5092 CNRS), Département Réponse et Dynamique Cellulaires, CEA-Grenoble, DRDC/BBSI, 17 rue des Martyrs, 38054 Grenoble Cedex 09, France
4 Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, 725 N. Wolfe St., 114 WBSB, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
5 Laboratoire des Matériaux et Génie des Procédés, ENS de Physique de Grenoble, Domaine Universitaire, 38402 Saint-Martin d'Hères, France
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: fbruckert{at}cea.fr)
Accepted 27 April 2005
![]() |
Summary |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Calcium, Heterotrimeric G proteins, Motility, Hydrodynamic flow, Mechanosensitivity, Dictyostelium discoideum
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
At the molecular level, dendritic actin polymerization is controlled by small G proteins of the Rac/Cdc42 subfamily, which activate the Arp2/3 nucleator complex through WASP or VASP adaptor molecules (Krause et al., 2003; Welch and Mullins, 2002
). Members of the myosin 1 family are also recruited and activated at the leading edge (Fukui et al., 1989
). Small G proteins of the Rho subfamily stimulate growth of actin bundles and myosin 2 binding to actin through formin and Rho kinase (ROCK) activation (Gasteier et al., 2003
). Efficient actin polymerization also requires barbed-end capping and uncapping activity (Carlier and Pantaloni, 1997
; Pollard and Borisy, 2003
) and the presence of profilin and cofilin to speed up the actin polymerization-depolymerization cycle (DesMarais et al., 2002
; Wolven et al., 2000
). The activity of many actin-binding proteins is regulated by phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2), whose turnover is very active at the leading edge (Sakisaka et al., 1997
). In particular, gelsolin, an actin filament-severing and barbed end-capping molecule, binds to PIP2 and is released from the plasma membrane by micromolar concentrations of Ca2+ (Lin et al., 1997
).
Recently, we have shown that application of hydrodynamic shear stress to Dictyostelium discoideum cells adhering to a flat glass surface triggers their movement in the direction of the flow (Décavé et al., 2003). Directionality of the movement requires the formation of a phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (PIP3) gradient through phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) activity. Since forces applied to the cell are lower or comparable with the ones internally exerted by the cell during random motility or chemotaxis, it is likely that mechanosensitivity is part of a physiological mechanism controlling the local movement of cell edges. Shear-flow-induced cell motility would therefore result from biasing the stress balance within the cell.
In this paper, we examine the role of calcium and heterotrimeric G proteins, two ubiquitous players of signaling pathways, in shear stress-induced motility. During chemotaxis, heterotrimeric G proteins play an essential role in determining the direction of cell movement (directional sensing) (Devreotes and Janetopoulos, 2003; Wu et al., 1995
), whereas calcium entry through plasma membrane channels is associated with uropod contraction phases (Nebl and Fisher, 1997
; Yumura et al., 1996
). Here we show that the presence of external calcium entry and calcium release from internal stores stimulate the amplitude of cell protrusions and retractions in contact with the substrate. During shear-flow-induced motility, these calcium fluxes stimulate cell speed, but marginally affect cell directionality. Using knockout mutants, we show that heterotrimeric G proteins are also involved in the control of cell speed, but not cell direction, probably through the activation of phospholipase C and the IP3-receptor.
![]() |
Materials and Methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Cell adhesion measurements
Cell adhesion to glass plates was measured in SB at different CaCl2 concentrations in the presence of the cytoskeleton depolymerizing agent N-(3-chlorophenyl)isopropyl carbamate (CIPC) at a 2 µg ml-1 final concentration from a 10 mg ml-1 stock in DMSO, with a radial flow detachment assay (Décavé et al., 2002). Flow was applied during 15 minutes to complete the detachment kinetics. Results are given as critical shear stresses
50% (in Pa) that detach 50% of the cells.
Titration of extracellular calcium concentration
Calcium Green 2 (CG2, Molecular Probes, Interchim France) was added at a 1 µM final concentration to the solution, whose calcium concentration had to be determined. Known amounts of calibrated calcium or EGTA solutions were then added and the CG2 fluorescence was measured, subtracting the autofluorescence background. The data were fitted with the following equation:
![]() | (1) |
Cell motility experimental setup
Motility assays were conducted in a transparent lateral flow chamber using glass plates as previously described (Décavé et al., 2003). To visualize cell morphological changes during motility at a higher magnification, a new lateral flow chamber was built, designed on a similar overall basis, but using 25x60 mm2 coverslips (Erie). In both cases, shear stress was calculated from geometrical and hydrodynamical parameters as:
![]() | (2) |
Cell motility recording at low and high resolutions
To record shear-flow-induced motility at low resolution, cells were introduced into a glass plate flow chamber filled with SB or MES-Na buffer and allowed to adhere to the glass surface for 2 minutes. Unbound cells were removed by flowing buffer at a very low shear stress (0.1 Pa) from an upper tank. When needed, the fluid bathing the cells was replaced by flowing another solution for 3 minutes at low shear stress. Cell motility was triggered by the application of a constant larger shear stress and images were recorded every 15 seconds or 30 seconds during 10-15 minutes, depending on the expected cell speed. When indicated, calcium concentration was changed during the assay by exchanging the solutions flowing from different upper tanks using valves. Cells were observed at a 2.5x magnification under dark field illumination with a Zeiss EM405 inverted microscope. Images were taken by a SP-Eye cooled CCD video camera (Photonic Science, UK) controlled by the Image Pro Plus software (Media Cybernetics).
For high-resolution imaging using phase contrast, fluorescence or reflection interference contrast microscopy (RICM), cells were observed with a 60x oil objective on an inverted microscope (Olympus IX-71) under phase or episcopic illumination. Calcium Green 2 fluorescence was selected with a BGW cube (Olympus) and supplementary BG18 and BG28 excitation and emission filters (Melles Griot). Reflection Interference Contrast was obtained by selecting the 546 nm peak of the episcopic mercury lamp by a combination of interference and blue-green filters and illumination through an episcopic polarization cube. For all microscopic techniques, light intensity was reduced with neutral density filters, since high illumination intensities block cell movement.
To record phase contrast, CG2 fluorescence or RICM images during shear-flow-induced motility at high resolution, cells were introduced into a coverslip flow chamber in SB as described above. Typically, two kinds of experiments were performed. The first one consisted of applying shear stress to cells adapted to a given calcium concentration. The calcium concentration was raised to the indicated value at low shear stress, image recording was started (1 image per second) and a larger shear stress was applied 20 seconds later during 3 minutes. The second one consisted of varying the external calcium concentration around cells already submitted to shear-flow. A large shear stress was applied in SB, image recording was started (1 image per second) and the calcium concentration was raised during the experiment by flowing a 1 mM solution in SB from another upper tank. With valves located near the flow chamber, the calcium concentration was raised in less than 10 seconds. It is important to note that the fluid level in the different tanks was precisely adjusted to avoid any pressure changes, since bending of the coverslip slightly changed cell position relative to the objective. In addition, focusing was adjusted during the run by visual inspection. Images were taken by an intensified cooled CCD video camera (Photonic Science, UK) mounted on an Olympus IX-71 inverted microscope, controlled by the Image Pro Plus software. Since exposure to even moderate light levels is harmful to cells, samples were renewed after 45 minutes.
Intracellular calcium visualization
To visualize intracellular calcium concentration changes, Dictyostelium cells were resuspended in SB containing 100 µM CG2 at 5x107 cells ml-1 in a 60 µl total volume and electroporated in a 2 mm wide cuvette at 4°C (electrical settings: 3 µF, 750 V, time constant: 2 milliseconds, Biorad electropulse apparatus). Cells were recovered with 1 ml SB supplemented with 5 mM MgCl2 and 0.1 mM CaCl2, pelleted by centrifugation (1000 g, 4°C, 3 minutes), resuspended in 10 ml HL5 medium and incubated on a rotary shaker for 10 minutes at 21°C, after which they were introduced in a coverslip flow chamber as described above.
Quantitative analysis of cell motility
Individual cell tracks were reconstituted from low-resolution movies as described previously (Décavé et al., 2003). Cells that came into contact with other cells or that detached during the recording were excluded from the following analysis. For a given cell, the instant velocity is given by:
![]() | (3) |
![]() | (4) |
![]() | (5) |
Dynamics of cell substrate contact areas
After recording RICM images, a background image obtained in the absence of cells was subtracted and the resulting images were segmented, using the Image Pro Plus software (IPP, MediaCybernetics). This generates a black and white movie showing the contact area evolution with time, where the cell-substrate contact areas appear white (pixel value 255) over a dark background (pixel value 0). The cell speed is defined as the mean velocity modulus of the center of mass of the contact area. Gain and loss zones are defined as the areas where the pixel value increases from 0 to 255, or decreases from 255 to 0, respectively, between two frames. The steady zone is the cell area where the pixel value stays constant. Mathematically, these areas are obtained by computing at each pixel the following function:
![]() | (6) |
![]() | (7) |
The gained and lost area growth rates are then plotted as a function of time and smoothed with a Savitzky and Golay algorithm. A 7- or 11-point algorithm is used for gain and loss growth rates, respectively. The position and values of the peaks and valleys are extracted. Peaks whose height is less than 0.2 µm2 s-1 over that of a neighbor valley are rejected because the existence of the peak is not significant compared with the pixel noise. Finally, for each recording, peak height and frequency are computed. The peak height is defined as the average value of all peaks. The peak frequency is defined as the inverse of the average time separating two successive peaks.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Fig. 1 shows cell responses to shear-flow at different external calcium concentrations. Raising the calcium concentration from <10 µM up to 1 mM moderately increases cell speed in the absence of the flow, but stimulates it fivefold in the presence of a 2.4 Pa shear stress (Fig. 1A, see also supplementary material, Movies 1 and 2) also marginally enhanced under these conditions (Fig. 1B). Conversely, lowering calcium concentration to about 0.4 µM by chelation with 100 µM EGTA instantaneously decreases cell speed (Fig. 1C). This effect is reversible since cell movement resumes when the external calcium concentration is increased again (Fig. 1C). In the continuous presence of 100 µM EGTA, cell motility spontaneously recovers after 5 minutes (data not shown), suggesting that cells adapt to low external calcium concentrations. In addition to its effect on cell motility, Ca2+ chelation also induces significant cell detachment from the substrate, which will be quantified below. Addition of 100 µM Gd3+, a known inhibitor of plasma membrane Ca2+-channels, reversibly and competitively stops cell movement (Fig. 1D). No spontaneous recovery is observed in this case. The possible role of magnesium, sodium and potassium ions was also addressed using alternative buffer formulation (MES-Na or MES-K buffers supplemented with MgCl2 or CaCl2, see supplementary material, Table S1). None of the tested ions but calcium was found to be specifically required for cell motility. Finally, extracellular pH was varied from 5 to 7 using MES and phosphate buffers. No change in cell speed nor directionality was observed between pH 6 and 7, ruling out a significant role of transmembrane pH gradients in cell motility (supplementary material, Table S1). Altogether, these results show that calcium channels are active at the plasma membrane and that calcium entry stimulates cell motility for cells submitted to shear stress.
|
Using cell speed as a measure of cell response to shear stress and raising or lowering the external Ca2+ concentration in the bathing fluid, we can plot the characteristic dose-response curve (Fig. 2A). To avoid any precipitation between calcium and phosphate in SB, these experiments were conducted in the presence of 20 mM MES-Na buffer (pH 6.2). Data are fitted with a single hyperbolic curve, suggesting that Ca2+ interacts mainly with a single class of targets (K50%=22 µM). The direct effect of calcium on passive cell adhesion to glass was also investigated, measuring 50% as a function of Ca2+ concentration in a radial flow chamber. This parameter is the shear stress at which half of the cells detach and is directly related to the interaction energy between adhesion protein complexes and the substrate (Décavé et al., 2002
). Radial flow detachment assays were conducted in the presence of CIPC, to uncouple passive adhesion from cytoskeleton dynamics (Décavé et al., 2002
; Décavé et al., 2003
). Fig. 2B shows that D. discoideum binding to glass in the presence of SB or MES-Na buffer is sensitive to calcium concentration, but the `apparent affinity' for
50% is ten times smaller than for cell speed (K50%=2.5 µM). The calcium target affecting cell adhesion is therefore distinct from that affecting cell motility.
|
|
An increase of cell speed is also observed when calcium concentration is raised under constant shear stress (Fig. 4A,B). As calcium enters the flow chamber, cell speed first slightly decreases during about 1 minute, then it increases for 3-5 minutes then it returns to its low calcium concentration level in about 15 minutes. Again, almost no change is observed on cell directionality. This transient acceleration is concomitant with a striking change in cell morphology (Fig. 4C,D, see also supplementary material, Movie 4). Dictyostelium cells examined 2 minutes after calcium rise are elongated, with one or a few large round protrusions at the front edge (Fig. 4C, white arrowheads) and a triangular retraction zone at the rear edge, very much looking as chemotaxing neutrophils (Xu et al., 2003). Furthermore, cell movement appears very smooth, with almost no side protrusions. In many occurrences, the front edge of the cell rhythmically moves, with a 9-12 seconds time period (see supplementary material, Movie 4, bottom cell and top right cell). Cells observed before the calcium rise or 15 minutes later present several smaller protrusions extending from the front edge (Fig. 4D, black arrowheads), without any structure clearly associated with the retracting parts. These results show that plasma membrane calcium channels are open in motile cells, and that their number or activity are regulated in response to shear stress and to external calcium concentration changes.
|
The previous analysis of the movies consisted of determining the position of the front and rear edges of the cell along the direction of the movement (Décavé et al., 2003). The front edge moves through fast extensions (bursts), separated by immobility phases whereas the rear edge moves more smoothly. Such analysis conducted on recorded movies shows that burst length increases with the external calcium concentration (data not shown). However, at calcium concentrations higher than 100 µM, many cell extensions correspond to the formation of new contact zones rather than to the lateral extension of existing ones. A new image analysis procedure was therefore designed, so that gained and lost contact areas between successive image frames are detected (see Materials and Methods). A color model of the cell-substrate contact areas is generated, where the gained areas are blue, the lost ones red and the steady areas green (see supplementary material, Movies 8-10). The areas gained and lost between successive frames, divided by the time interval, give the gained and lost area growth rates, respectively. They are plotted on Fig. 5A as a function of time, for individual cells at different calcium concentrations. At 5 µM calcium, the gained area growth rate is irregular, with large peaks separated by periods of reduced activity. Large peaks correspond to bursts detected in the previous analysis. As for the lost area growth rate, almost no organization appears over a steady 1 µm2 s-1 loss rate. At larger calcium concentrations, the gain and loss growth rates appear much more regular, with peaks of high activity repeating at 9-11 seconds time intervals. Representative examples are shown, that were recorded at 100 and 300 µM calcium concentrations (Fig. 5A). Periodic occurrence of protrusions and retractions is especially noticeable on Movie 10 (see supplementary material) (Fig. 5A 300 µM calcium: 90-150 seconds left panel, 30-90 seconds right panel). Periodic protrusive activity is also noticeable at low calcium concentration on the graph. A similar analysis was performed on ten cell recordings and, for each of them, the average height of the peaks and the average time between successive peaks were calculated. These parameters are plotted on Fig. 5B,C as a function of the average cell speed during the recording. A good correlation is found between the gain and loss peak height and cell speed, whereas peak frequency is constant, whatever the calcium concentration. The frequency of protrusions is slightly larger (0.11±0.01 Hz) than that of retractions (0.08±0.01 Hz)
.
|
The cell speed increase due to external calcium therefore results from a stimulation of cell spreading and retraction activities. This stimulation acts on the protrusion and retraction area growth rates but not on the frequency of these events.
As an attempt to visualize possible internal calcium concentration variations during cell movement, cells were loaded with the calcium indicator CG2. Spreading of these CG2-loaded cells to glass absolutely required addition of at least 100 µM calcium in the external medium and full reconstitution of movement was obtained only after allowing cells to recover in growth medium (see Materials and Methods). The calcium requirement for spreading again proves the existence of a calcium influx coupled to the deformation of cell cortex. The same effect was observed with other calcium indicators at a similar concentration. Within the cells, CG2 fluorescence accumulated in vesicles of different sizes in addition to a uniform, probably cytosolic distribution. Neither gross variation of the uniform fluorescent background nor a clear intracellular gradient was observed in cell undergoing fast shear-flow-induced motility. Periodic protrusive and retractile activities associated to cell movement therefore do not correspond to large intracellular calcium fluctuations. Interestingly, in most cells, a fluorescent zone was observed at the cell rear, whose intensity rhythmically fluctuated (see supplementary material, Movie 11). With a period of about a minute, fluorescence steadily increased then suddenly decreased. Alternating phase contrast and fluorescence illuminations showed that this oscillation originates from the contractile vacuole activity, which presumably pumps CG2 out of the cell through a calcium-rich compartment as discussed previously (Rooney et al., 1994).
Heterotrimeric G proteins are involved in calcium stimulation of shear-flow-induced cell motility
To test for the involvement of heterotrimeric G proteins in shear-flow-induced Dictyostelium cell motility, a mutant cell line was used, LW6, where the single gene coding for the ß-subunit of this protein family was removed by homologous recombination (Lilly et al., 1993; Wu et al., 1995
). At 5 µM calcium concentration, Gß-null cells exhibit directional motility in response to shear stress, comparable with that of the parental DH1 cell line. Similarly, lowering calcium concentration with EGTA blocks cell motility and induces its detachment (data not shown). Increasing calcium concentration however does not speed up cell movement. This is quantitatively shown in Fig. 6A, where cell speed is plotted as a function of the external calcium concentration. As shown before, results are fitted with a single class of Ca2+ sites whose affinity is not measurable for Gß-null cells (Gß
) cells (K50%>1000 µM). Expression of a Gß gene in Gß-null cells partially restores Ca2+ sensitivity to shear-flow-induced motility (K50%=150 µM). The speed of Gß-null cells is also much less sensitive to external shear stress than the rescued ones in the presence of millimolar calcium (Fig. 6C). However, directional sensing is marginally affected by the lack of the heterotrimeric G protein ß-subunit, since clear orientation in the direction of the flow occurs at shear stresses higher than 1.7 Pa for Gß-null cells and 1.5 Pa for the rescued ones (Fig. 6D). Furthermore, when calcium concentration is raised from the micromolar to millimolar levels under constant shear flow, no change in cell speed is recorded for Gß-null cells, whereas the rescued cells accelerate, albeit more slowly than Ax2 wild-type cells (Fig. 6B). These results suggest that calcium channels are closed in Gß-null cells under shear flow.
|
|
A Dictyostelium IP3-receptor like protein amplifies calcium stimulation of shear-flow-induced cell motility
In higher eukaryotic cells, heterotrimeric G proteins activate phospholipase C ß-isoform, which cleaves membrane-bound PIP2 into diacylglycerol (DAG) and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3). In turn, soluble IP3 triggers intracellular calcium release from the endoplasmic reticulum by binding to a specific IP3-receptor. In Dictyostelium, a single PLC isoform is known, which belongs to the -isoform family and is activated by calcium (Cubitt and Firtel, 1992
; Drayer et al., 1994
). In addition, an IP3-receptor-like gene was found (iplA), whose disruption produces null cells in which Ca2+ entry in response to chemoattractants is greatly reduced (Traynor et al., 2000
). Nevertheless IP3-receptor null cells are still able to chemotax toward cAMP, and cAMP or cGMP productions in response to a cAMP pulse are normal.
We measured shear-flow-induced motility of IP3-receptor null cells and the parental RK-Ax2 cells. Cells from both strains move in the direction of the flow and are sensitive to external calcium concentrations but IP3-receptor null cells requires more calcium to reach the same speed than wild-type cells (Fig. 8A). The mobilization of internal Ca2+ stores is therefore a major contributor to cell speed under shear stress.
|
In conclusion, the presence of heterotrimeric G proteins, the IP3-receptor-like protein and an external calcium concentration above 30 µM are required for rapid actin cytoskeleton reorganization, resulting in efficient cell motility.
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
The calcium response of wild-type cells is however extremely slow, compared with the time expected for calcium diffusion within the cells. Furthermore, cells lacking the IP3-receptor require 20 times more calcium to reach the same speed and respond even more slowly to external calcium changes. This suggests that in wild-type cells, the main calcium flux comes from internal stores and that external calcium entry stimulates internal calcium release, as observed in many cells. A possible candidate for this process is PLC, which is indeed activated by calcium in vegetative cells (Cubitt and Firtel, 1992
). It has been shown in vitro that IP3 triggers Ca2+ release from Dictyostelium intracellular compartments (Schaloske et al., 2000
). In this way, intracellular calcium release would amplify the small calcium entry from the plasma membrane. Without IP3-receptors, residual sensitivity to external calcium is however still possible, whereas it is abolished in Gß-null cells. Heterotrimeric G proteins would control plasma membrane calcium channels in vegetative motile cells. A tentative scheme combining the biochemical knowledge of Dictyostelium signaling pathways and our new results is depicted in Fig. 9.
Using fluorescent markers, no gross change in cytoplasmic calcium concentration is experimentally observed. Calcium variations are indeed well buffered within Dictyostelium cells and therefore, calcium concentration changes are necessarily restricted to the border of plasma membrane or internal calcium stores. A localized calcium increase would facilitate the turnover of actin polymerization-depolymerization, for instance by activating proteins such as gelsolin, whose activity is modulated by calcium at a 15-25 µM affinity (Ditsch and Wegner, 1995; Kinosian et al., 1998
). Calcium is therefore involved in the fast remodeling of actin structures rather than in cell polarization mechanisms.
A correlation between intracellular calcium levels and chemotactic motility has already been observed in neutrophils (Mandeville et al., 1995). Furthermore, internal calcium concentrations periodically fluctuate in moving keratocytes and application of shear stress by stretching a flexible substrate underneath the cell induces a calcium transient (Lee et al., 1999
). Recently, it was reported that ultrafast Ca2+ waves travel through fMLP-stimulated neutrophils (Kindzelskii and Petty, 2003
). In Dictyostelium cells, cAMP receptor activation stimulates calcium entry (Nebl et al., 2002
; Schaloske et al., 2000
; Yumura et al., 1996
), but eliminating capacitive calcium entry by knocking out the Dictyostelium IP3-receptor-like gene does not affect chemotaxis speed and directionality (Traynor et al., 2000
). It should, however, be noted that in the reported cAMP chemotaxis experiments, Dictyostelium speed was close to that observed during random motility, suggesting that stimulation was not at its maximal. In addition, introduction of EGTA calcium buffer stops net cell movement but does not prevent cell orientation in the direction of a cAMP gradient, revealed by protrusion elongation in this direction (Unterweger and Schlatterer, 1995
; Van Duijn and Van Haastert, 1992
). Intracellular loading with BAPTA, a calcium buffer which has a similar Ca2+ dissociation constant to EGTA but an about 150-fold faster rate of Ca2+ binding (Tsien, 1980
), prevents both motility and oriented pseudopod emission (Schlatterer and Malchow, 1993
; Unterweger and Schlatterer, 1995
). It seems, therefore, likely that during chemotaxis as well, calcium controls cell speed, but not directionality. At this stage of our knowledge, chemotaxis and shear-flow-induced motility signaling pathways differ in two respects. (1) Heterotrimeric G proteins are essential for cAMP and folic acid signal transduction but are dispensable for mechanosensitivity. (2) The phg2 kinase is required for vegetative cell explorative or shear-flow-induced motility but not during multicellular development, hence for cAMP chemotaxis (Gebbie et al., 2004
).
The new image analysis procedure developed in this work points out to the existence of oscillations in the cell edge movement, at a 9 and 12 seconds period for protrusions and retractions, respectively. The amplitude of these oscillations increases with cell speed, but their frequency is almost constant. The linear relationship between gained or lost area growth rate and cell speed is easily interpreted. Some protrusions and retractions of the cell edge are effective since they result in net cell movement. Others do not and their activity is independent of cell speed. We can thus write the area growth rate as the sum of two terms:
![]() | (8) |
Finally, this work extends our previous report of directional mechano-sensitivity: at low shear stress (0.5 Pa), cells tend to oppose to the force exerted by the flow whereas they tend to move in the direction of the force at higher shear stress. Dictyostelium indeed recapitulates the behavior of various cell lines: keratocytes, for instance, move in the direction of the force (Verkhovsky et al., 1999) in contrast to fibroblasts, which oppose detachment by reinforcing focal contacts (Riveline et al., 2001
). It should be noted that at a shear stress giving rise to zero directionality (about 0.6-1.2 Pa), cell behavior is not random, but clearly bi-directional (see supplementary material, Movie 3). Bi-directionality of cell movement is indicative of a complex relationship between cell edge velocity and membrane tension. At each cell edge, two alternative macromolecular assemblies can indeed be recruited, that allow spreading or retraction. These machineries are both mechanically and biochemically incompatible at the same site (Meili and Firtel, 2003
; Xu et al., 2003
). Our results show that membrane tension, which is modulated by shear-flow within a single cell, affects the state of the complex actin cytoskeleton dynamics.
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
![]() |
Footnotes |
---|
There is not any contradiction between the conservation of the average cell-substrate contact area during the movement and the fact that protrusion and retraction growth rates have the same amplitude and different frequencies. Consider an ideal situation where the gained or lost area growth rate dA/dt is modeled by a sinusoidal function: dA/dt=A0+A1 cos(
t). On average, <dA/dt>=A0, whatever the frequency 2
/
. The maximum amplitude of the peaks is A0+A1. Our results show that A0 and A1 are similar for protrusions and retractions and
is different.
Using all RICM recordings, we measured the average contact length between the gained and the steady areas L1, and the average contact length between the lost and steady area L2. L1 and L2 are independent of the external calcium concentration (data not shown) and indeed comparable to L: L1=8.4±3.5 µm, L2=9.5±4.1 µm.
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Bailly, M. and Condeelis, J. (2002). Cell motility: insights from the backstage. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 292-294.[CrossRef]
Borisy, G. G. and Svitkina, T. M. (2000). Actin machinery: pushing the envelope. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 12, 104-112.[CrossRef][Medline]
Carlier, M. F. and Pantaloni, D. (1997). Control of actin dynamics in cell motility. J. Mol. Biol. 269, 459-467.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chadwick, C. M., Ellison, J. E. and Garrod, D. R. (1984). Dual role for Dictyostelium contact site B in phagocytosis and developmental size regulation. Nature 307, 646-647.[CrossRef][Medline]
Clow, P. A. and McNally, J. G. (1999). In vivo observations of myosin II dynamics support a role in rear retraction. Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 1309-1323.
Coates, J. C. and Harwood, A. J. (2001). Cell-cell adhesion and signal transduction during Dictyostelium development. J. Cell Sci. 114, 4349-4358.[Medline]
Cubitt, A. B. and Firtel, R. A. (1992). Characterization of phospholipase activity in Dictyostelium discoideum. Identification of a Ca(2+)-dependent polyphosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C. Biochem. J. 283, 371-378.[Medline]
Décavé, E., Garrivier, D., Brechet, Y., Fourcade, B. and Bruckert, F. (2002). Shear-flow-induced detachment kinetics of Dictyostelium discoideum cells from solid substrate. Biophys. J. 82, 2383-2395.
Décavé, E., Rieu, D., Dalous, J., Fache, S., Brechet, Y., Fourcade, B., Satre, M. and Bruckert, F. (2003). Shear-flow-induced motility of Dictyostelium discoideum cells on solid substrate. J. Cell Sci. 116, 4331-4343.
DesMarais, V., Ichetovkin, I., Condeelis, J. and Hitchcock-DeGregori, S. E. (2002). Spatial regulation of actin dynamics: a tropomyosin-free, actin rich compartment at the leading edge. J. Cell Sci. 115, 4649-4660.
Devreotes, P. and Janetopoulos, C. (2003). Eukaryotic chemotaxis: distinctions between directional sensing and polarization. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 8.
Ditsch, A. and Wegner, A. (1995). Two low-affinity Ca(2+)-binding sites of gelsolin that regulate association with actin. Eur. J. Biochem. 229, 512-516.[Abstract]
Drayer, A. L., Van der Kaay, J., Mayr, G. W. and Van Haastert, P. J. (1994). Role of phospholipase C in Dictyostelium: formation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and normal development in cells lacking phospholipase C activity. EMBO J. 13, 1601-1609.[Abstract]
Friedl, P., Borgmann, S. and Brocker, E. B. (2001). Amoeboid leukocyte crawling through extracellular matrix: lessons from the Dictyostelium paradigm of cell movement. J. Leukocyte Biol. 70, 491-509.
Fukui, Y., Lynch, T. J., Brzeska, H. and Korn, E. D. (1989). Myosin I is located at the leading edges of locomoting Dictyostelium amoebae. Nature 341, 328-331.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gasteier, J. E., Madrid, R., Krautkramer, E., Schroder, S., Muranyi, W., Benichou, S. and Fackler, O. T. (2003). Activation of the Rac-binding partner FHOD1 induces actin stress fibers via a ROCK-dependent mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 38902-38912.
Gebbie, L., Benghezal, M., Cornillon, S., Froquet, R., Cherix, N., Malbouyres, M., Lefkir, Y., Grangeasse, C., Fache, S., Dalous, J. et al. (2004). Phg2, a kinase involved in adhesion and focal site modeling in Dictyostelium. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 3915-3925.
Grimson, M. J., Coates, J. C., Reynolds, J. P., Shipman, M., Blanton, R. L. and Harwood, A. J. (2000). Adherens junctions and beta-catenin-mediated cell signalling in a non-metazoan organism. Nature 408, 727-731.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kindzelskii, A. L. and Petty, H. R. (2003). Intracellular calcium waves accompany neutrophil polarization, formylmethionylleucylphenylalanine stimulation, and phagocytosis: a high speed microscopy study. J. Immunol. 170, 64-72.
Kinosian, H. J., Newman, J., Lincoln, B., Selden, L. A., Gershman, L. C. and Estes, J. E. (1998). Ca2+ regulation of gelsolin activity: binding and severing of F-actin. Biophys. J. 75, 3101-3139.
Knecht, D. A., Fuller, D. L. and Loomis, W. F. (1987). Surface glycoprotein, gp24, involved in early adhesion of Dictyostelium discoideum. Dev. Biol. 121, 277-283.[CrossRef][Medline]
Krause, M., Dent, E. W., Bear, J. E., Loureiro, J. J. and Gertler, F. B. (2003). Ena/VASP proteins: regulators of the actin cytoskeleton and cell migration. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 19, 541-564.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lee, J., Ishihara, A., Oxford, G., Johnson, B. and Jacobson, K. (1999). Regulation of cell movement is mediated by stretch-activated calcium channels. Nature 400, 382-386.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lilly, P., Wu, L., Welker, D. L. and Devreotes, P. N. (1993). A G protein beta-subunit is essential for Dictyostelium development. Genes Dev. 7, 986-995.[Abstract]
Lin, K. M., Wenegieme, E., Lu, P. J., Chen, C. S. and Yin, H. L. (1997). Gelsolin binding to phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate is modulated by calcium and pH. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 50.
Mandeville, J. T., Ghosh, R. N. and Maxfield, F. R. (1995). Intracellular calcium levels correlate with speed and persistent forward motion in migrating neutrophils. Biophys. J. 68, 1207-1217.[Abstract]
Meili, R. and Firtel, R. A. (2003). Two poles and a compass. Cell 114, 153-156.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nebl, T. and Fisher, P. R. (1997). Intracellular Ca2+ signals in Dictyostelium chemotaxis are mediated exclusively by Ca2+ influx. J. Cell Sci. 110, 2845-2853.
Nebl, T., Kotsifas, M., Schaap, P. and Fisher, P. R. (2002). Multiple signalling pathways connect chemoattractant receptors and calcium-channels in Dictyostelium. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 23, 853-865.[CrossRef][Medline]
Niewohner, J., Weber, I., Maniak, M., Muller-Taubenberger, A. and Gerisch, G. (1997). Talin-null cells of Dictyostelium are strongly defective in adhesion to particle and substrate surfaces and slightly impaired in cytokinesis. J. Cell Biol. 138, 349-361.
Pollard, T. D. and Borisy, G. G. (2003). Cellular motility driven by assembly and disassembly of actin filaments. Cell 112, 453-465.[CrossRef][Medline]
Riveline, D., Zamir, E., Balaban, N. Q., Schwarz, U. S., Ishizaki, T., Narumiya, S., Kam, Z., Geiger, B. and Bershadsky, A. D. (2001). Focal contacts as mechanosensors: externally applied local mechanical force induces growth of focal contacts by an mDia1-dependent and ROCK-independent mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 153, 1175-1186.
Rooney, E. K., Gross, J. D. and Satre, M. (1994). Characterisation of an intracellular Ca2+ pump in Dictyostelium. Cell Calcium 16, 509-522.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sakisaka, T., Itoh, T., Miura, K. and Takenawa, T. (1997). Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate phosphatase regulates the rearrangement of actin filaments. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 3841-3849.[Abstract]
Schaloske, R., Schlatterer, C. and Malchow, D. (2000). A Xestospongin C-sensitive Ca(2+) store is required for cAMP-induced Ca(2+) influx and cAMP oscillations in Dictyostelium. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 8404-8408.
Schlatterer, C. and Malchow, D. (1993). Intracellular Gunaosine-5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) blocks chemotactic motility of Dictyostelium discoideum amoebae. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 25, 298-307.[CrossRef][Medline]
Traynor, D., Milne, J. L., Insall, R. H. and Kay, R. R. (2000). Ca(2+) signalling is not required for chemotaxis in Dictyostelium. EMBO J. 19, 4846-4854.
Tsien, R. Y. (1980). New calcium indicators with high selectivity against magnesium and protons: design, synthesis, and properties of prototype structures. Biochemistry 19, 2396-2404.[CrossRef][Medline]
Unterweger, N. and Schlatterer, C. (1995). Introduction of calcium buffers into the cytosol of Dictyostelium discoideum amoebae alters cell morphology and inhibits chemotaxis. Cell Calcium 17, 97-110.[CrossRef][Medline]
Van Duijn, B. and Van Haastert, P. J. (1992). Independent control of locomotion and orientation during Dictyostelium discoideum chemotaxis. J. Cell Sci. 102, 763-768.[Abstract]
Verkhovsky, A. B., Svitkina, T. M. and Borisy, G. G. (1999). Self-polarization and directional motility of cytoplasm. Curr. Biol. 9, 11-20.[CrossRef][Medline]
Watts, D. J. and Ashworth, J. M. (1970). Growth of myxameobae of the cellular slime mould Dictyostelium discoideum in axenic culture. Biochem. J. 119, 171-174.[Medline]
Welch, M. D. and Mullins, R. D. (2002). Cellular control of actin nucleation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 18, 247-288.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wolven, A. K., Belmont, L. D., Mahoney, N. M., Almo, S. C. and Drubin, D. G. (2000). In vivo importance of actin nucleotide exchange catalyzed by profilin. J. Cell Biol. 150, 895-904.
Wong, E. F., Brar, S. K., Sesaki, H., Yang, C. and Siu, C. H. (1996). Molecular cloning and characterization of DdCAD-1, a Ca2+-dependent cell-cell adhesion molecule, in Dictyostelium discoideum. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 16399-16408.
Wu, L., Valkema, R., Van Haastert, P. J. and Devreotes, P. N. (1995). The G protein beta subunit is essential for multiple responses to chemoattractants in Dictyostelium. J. Cell Biol. 129, 1667-1675.[Abstract]
Xu, J., Wang, F., Van Keymeulen, A., Herzmark, P., Straight, A., Kelly, K., Takuwa, Y., Sugimoto, N., Mitchison, T. and Bourne, H. R. (2003). Divergent signals and cytoskeletal assemblies regulate self-organizing polarity in neutrophils. Cell 114, 201-214.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yumura, S., Furuya, K. and Takeuchi, I. (1996). Intracellular free calcium responses during chemotaxis of Dictyostelium cells. J. Cell Sci. 109, 2673-2678.