1 Laboratory for Development and Evolution, University Museum of Zoology,
Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2
3EJ, UK
2 Centre de Biologie du Développement, CNRS UMR5547, Université
Paul Sabatier, Bât. 4R3, 118 Route de Narbonne 31062, Toulouse,
France
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: roch{at}cict.fr)
Accepted 29 November 2002
![]() |
Summary |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: ZP proteins, Cuticulin envelope, Epithelial morphogenesis, Cuticule formation, Drosophila
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
This first cuticle layer known as the cuticulin envelope is
only 120-175 Å deep. It is structurally different from other cuticle
layers, being mainly composed of crosslinked proteins and lipids (see
Locke, 2001). In
Drosophila wings, this protective envelope is secreted at about 32-34
hours APF, it covers the epidermis while changes in cell shape are taking
place and eventually forms the outer-most surface of the mature cuticle, once
the bulk of the chitinous cuticle has been secreted
(Mitchell et al., 1983
). The
cuticulin envelope defines an enclosed extracellular compartment above the
apical membrane, where the assembly of the cuticle can proceed
(Locke, 1998
). The formation
of a cuticulin envelope is a common feature of all arthropods cuticles and has
long been recognised as critical for defining the final form of arthropod
epithelia (Locke, 2001
).
Nothing is known about the genes required to specify the form and function
of the cuticulin envelope in Drosophila. We have studied mutants in
two genes, dusky (dy) and miniature (m),
that have been known for a long time to affect the morphology of adult wing
cells [m was isolated in 1910 by T. H. Morgan and dy in 1916
by C. Bridges (reviewed in Lindsley and
Zimm, 1992)]. In mutants for either gene, the size of the whole
wing is significantly reduced and the cuticle is darker than in the wildtype
(hence the names of the genes). Dobzhansky showed that the reduced size of
m wings is because of a reduction in the size of individual wing
epidermal cells (Dobzhansky,
1929
): these wings have a normal number of cells and are correctly
patterned (see also Newby et al.,
1991
).
One of these two genes, dusky, has recently been shown to encode a
transmembrane protein containing a ZP (zona pellucida) domain
(DiBartolomeis et al., 2002), a
motif common to a large family of vertebrate and invertebrate extracellular
matrix components (Bork and Sander,
1992
; Wassarman et al.,
2001
). One member of this family, the product of the C.
elegans cuticulin-1 gene (cut-1), has been identified as a
structural component of the most external part of the worm cuticle
(Sebastiano et al., 1991
).
Here we show that the m gene also encodes a ZP protein. Min and Dy
proteins, together with one other encoded by a previously unidentified
Drosophila gene revealed by the genome sequence, define a novel
subfamily of dusky-related ZP proteins. We show that all three genes
of this subfamily are expressed in cuticle-secreting epithelia. We also
describe the cellular behaviour of mutants of both m and dy
during wing morphogenesis. We argue that these proteins may be components of
the cuticulin envelope itself or of a specialised apical matrix that is
necessary for the organisation of the apical membrane and its interaction with
cytoskeletal components during cell shape reorganisation.
![]() |
Materials and Methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Microscopy
For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), adult whole animals were dehydrated
in absolute ethanol and then in a critical point dryer and subsequently coated
with gold in a Polaron sputter coater. They were visualised with a Philips
XL30 FEG scanning electron microscope. Samples for transmission electron
microscopy (TEM) were fixed overnight at 4°C by immersion in 4%
glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M PIPES buffer at pH 7.4 containing 2 mM
CaCl2 and 0.3% H2O2. After fixation, samples
were rinsed twice in PIPES buffer, treated with 1% osmium ferricyanide for 1
hour at 4°C, rinsed in distilled water, bulk stained in 2% uranyl acetate,
dehydrated in ethanol and finally embedded in Spur's epoxy resin. Thin
sections (50 nm) were cut with a Leica Ultracut-UCT microtome, double stained
with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and viewed in a Philips CM100
transmission electron microscope operated at 80 KV. For confocal microscopy,
pupae were collected at puparium formation (0 hours APF), aged until the
desired stage and fixed overnight in 4% formaldehyde in PEM (0.1 M PIPES, 1 mM
EGTA, 2 mM MgSO4, pH 6.9) after removal of the operculum. The
following day, the pupal case was removed and the wings hand peeled before
staining with 2 mM rhodamin phalloidin (Molecular Probes) in PBT. The wings
were mounted in Vectashield (Vector) for visualisation on a Leica confocal
microscope.
In situ hybridisation
Exonic fragments of 1.5 kb and 1.8 kb corresponding respectively to
CG9369 and CG15013 were cloned from genomic DNA by PCR in
the pGEMT vector (Promega). Sense and antisense DIG-labelled riboprobes were
synthesised using the Boehringer kit from these vectors and from the
dy complete cDNA cloned in Bluescript (a gift of R. Jackson). In situ
hybridisation in embryos and pupae were performed following standard protocols
(Sturtevant et al., 1993) with
some modifications, all available from F.R. upon request.
Immunostainings and generation of the Min antibody
The fragment coding for amino acids 346 to 547 of the CG9369 predicted
protein was amplified by PCR from wild-type genomic DNA and cloned in-frame in
the pRSETB vector (Invitrogen). The resulting 6x His-tagged protein was
purified with the Pharmacia kit from the soluble fraction obtained after
bacterial sonication. The fraction containing the purified protein was loaded
in a SDS-PAGE gel, and the resulting band was cut and used to immunise rabbits
following standard protocols (Eurogentec, Belgium). The rabbit anti-Min serum
fails to recognise any specific signal in immunostainings performed on
m1 mutant embryos and is capable of specifically
recognising the Min protein produced in vivo with a UAS-miniature
transgene (F.R. and C.R.A., unpublished). Stainings were carried out using
rabbit anti-Min (1:100) and rat anti-E-Cadherin (1:50) (a gift from O.
Renaud). Secondaries were 1:200 FITC anti-rabbit and 1:200 Cy5 anti-rat
(Jackson Labs). Cell nuclei were labelled with the TOPRO nuclear dye
(Molecular Probes).
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In this work we have studied the phenotypes caused by Df(1)MR, a
small deletion that fails to complement both dy and m
mutations (Roberts and Jackson,
1997). Males hemizygous for this deficiency are viable, but the
size of their wings is significantly smaller than in either wild-type
(Fig. 1A,B), or in dy
or m single mutants (data not shown). Df(1)MR removes the
dy coding sequence and is thus a dy-null allele
(DiBartolomeis et al., 2002
).
Comparison of the molecular maps of the m-dy region
(DiBartolomeis et al., 2002
)
with the genome sequence (Adams et al.,
2000
) reveals that Df(1)MR also removes most of the
coding region of an adjacent predicted gene, CG9369. This gene, which
we have identified unequivocally as miniature (see below), encodes a
transmembrane protein clearly related to that encoded by the dy
locus. This, and the fact that dy and m point alleles have
similar phenotypes, suggests that these two proteins may have a similar
function.
|
miniature and dusky mutant wings secrete abnormal
cuticles
To understand the cellular basis for the observed reduction in cell size,
we characterised in detail the phenotype of adult males hemizygous for
Df(1)MR and hence lacking both m and dy functions.
Light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) show that Df(1)MR wings
dissected 2 hours after adult eclosion have pronounced defects in their
cuticle. In both wild-type and Df(1)MR wings, each epidermal cell
makes a hair on its apical surface. However, in Df(1)MR, wings hairs
are much closer to each other than in the wildtype, suggesting that the size
of individual cells is significantly reduced
(Fig. 1C-F). Df(1)MR
hairs are also shorter than in the wildtype and their structure is abnormal:
they are twisted and often branched (Fig.
1F). We also observe localised distensions of the cuticle surface
that bulge out of the main wing surface, a phenotype that indicates defects in
cuticle formation (Fig. 1F).
Similar defects are also observed in both dy and m single
mutants, but they are less severe (data not shown).
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of thin sections of Df(1)MR
adult wings confirms that cuticle structure is severely affected in the
mutants. In wild-type animals, wing epidermal cells have undergone apoptosis
by 2 hours after eclosion, and the dorsal and ventral cuticle surfaces forming
the wing are closely apposed by their basal sides
(Johnson and Milner, 1987)
(Fig. 1G,I). In the mutants,
cuticular material present inside the wing prevents the apposition of dorsal
and ventral surfaces. These indentations of cuticle form a honeycomb-like
pattern, marking the cell outlines that are visible in adult mutant wings
under light microscopy (Fig.
1D). The indentations appear to obstruct clearance of the cellular
debris produced after apoptosis of the epidermal cells
(Johnson and Milner, 1987
), as
we observe degenerating cell fragments between the two wing surfaces
(Fig. 1H,J). In contrast,
wild-type wings of similar age are totally clean of cell debris
(Fig. 1G,I).
The effects of dusky and miniature mutations are obvious only in the wings: the cuticle covering the epidermis of other parts of the body (haltere, notum, legs and abdominal plates) appears completely normal. To determine if subtle defects may be present elsewhere, we also performed TEM studies on the cuticle covering the adult haltere, a dorsal appendage that is homologous to the wing. Despite the high resolution of this analysis, we could detect no defects in the haltere cuticle (data not shown).
miniature and dusky mutants disrupt cell
morphogenesis during differentiation
To investigate the origin of the defects observed in Df(1)MR adult
wing cells, we compared the morphology of wild-type and mutant cells at
different stages during pupal development using confocal microscopy. We
employed two cytoskeleton markers: rhodamine-phalloidin, a fluorescent
compound that binds specifically to actin filaments and stains cell outlines
and epidermal hairs (Fristrom et al.,
1993) and an
-cateninGFP fusion protein
(Oda and Tsukida, 1999
). This
GFP-tagged protein localises in the apical junctions between epidermal cells
where the apical and basolateral membrane compartments meet.
We detect no obvious abnormalities in the morphology of Df(1)MR
mutant cells at 28-32 hours APF, a time when wing cells are columnar and still
hexagonal in outline (Fig. 2).
Between 42 and 48 hours APF, wild-type cells flatten, expand and become star
shaped (Fristrom et al., 1993).
They also develop prominent actin-filled extensions of their apical surface,
called hair pedestals, that can be visualised in wings staged 46-50 hours APF
(Fig. 2, arrowheads). In
mutants of the same age the apical cell contours remain hexagonal, and the
accumulation of actin at the hair pedestals is impaired
(Fig. 2). They also accumulate
actin abnormally, forming a ring in the apical part of the mutant cells
(Fig. 2, open arrowheads).
|
In wild-type wings staged 62-66 hours APF, phalloidin strongly stains the
apical cell membrane, which by then is secreting the adult chitinous cuticle
(Fristrom et al., 1993)
(Fig. 2). In Df(1)MR
mutants, the apical membrane folds deeply into the cleft between adjacent
cells, almost forming a capsule around the apical side of each cell
(Fig. 2). The walls of these
capsules are apposed to those of the neighbouring cells, leaving a narrow
space in between (Fig. 2, open
arrowheads). Below these structures, the cell maintains its hexagonal contour
at the level of the apical junctions, which accumulate larger amounts of
-cateninGFP than in the wildtype
(Fig. 2).
miniature, like dusky, encodes a transmembrane
protein with a ZP domain
The dy gene has recently been identified
(DiBartolomeis et al., 2002).
It encodes a putative transmembrane protein with an extracellular motif called
a ZP domain, a conserved domain present in transmembrane proteins described in
both vertebrates and invertebrates as components of various extracellular
matrices (Bork and Sander,
1992
; Wassarman et al.,
2001
; Wilkin et al.,
2000
; Chung et al.,
2001
).
Genetic data indicate that m mutations lie just to the left (i.e.
telomeric) of dy (Dorn and
Burdick, 1962). A survey of the Drosophila genome
sequence (Adams et al., 2000
)
reveals that the gene immediately to the left of dy in the chromosome
(CG9369) also encodes a transmembrane protein with a ZP domain. We
sequenced the complete predicted coding region of this gene in the
m1 mutant and found a deletion of 33 nucleotides
associated with an insertion of 13 nucleotides, 370 amino acids downstream of
the CG9369 predicted start codon (Fig.
3A). This small rearrangement causes a frameshift and a premature
stop codon within the coding sequence, indicating that CG9369 is the
m gene and that m1 is probably a null allele for
m. This is consistent with deficiency mapping data published by the
F. R. Jackson group (DiBartolomeis et al.,
2002
). Df(1)m259, which fails to complement
m alleles but not dy alleles, removes only sequences
upstream of m (presumably regulatory sequences necessary for
m expression), whereas Df(1)MR, Df(1)m30 and
Df(1)KA6, which fail to complement both m and dy
alleles, delete sequences from both coding regions
(DiBartolomeis et al., 2002
)
(Fig. 3A).
|
A BLAST search of the whole genome of Drosophila, using either the
dy or m ZP domains as probes, reveals that there are more
than a dozen putative proteins encoded by the fly genome that contain a ZP
domain. Sequence comparison of the Drosophila ZP domains among
themselves and with other non-fly homologues indicates that three of these
Drosophila ZP genes encode a distinct subfamily of ZP proteins
(Fig. 3B and data not shown).
These three genes are dy, m and CG15013, which is a
predicted open reading frame located at 64B1
(Adams et al., 2000)
(Fig. 3B). The ZP domains of Dy
and CG15013 are most similar (70% identity), with that of Min being more
divergent (45% identity with Dy, Fig.
3D). Their similarity to other Drosophila ZP domains and
C. elegans Cut-1 is largely confined to eight key cysteine residues,
landmarks of a ZP domain (Fig.
3D and data not shown).
We have studied the structure of the Dy, Min and CG15013 proteins using
SMART software to predict the position of architectural domains from protein
primary sequences (Schultz et al.,
1998). The three proteins include a putative transmembrane domain
separating a short intracellular C-terminus and a large extracellular
N-terminus containing the ZP domain (Fig.
3C). In addition, Dy, Min and CG15013 contain an ER import signal
peptide in their N-terminus (DiBartolomeis
et al., 2002
) (Fig.
3C), which is consistent with them being single-pass transmembrane
proteins.
They also have a basic tetrapeptide RRRR (RRAR in the case of Dy) located in between the ZP domain and the transmembrane domain, within the extracellular part of the protein. This small motif is common to many protein precursors cleaved by endopeptidases of the secretory pathway (Hosaka et al., 1997) and could be a target in Drosophila for a furin type endopeptidase, which releases the ZP-domain-containing region. Because of the similarities between CG15013 and Dy proteins (see also below), we name the gene CG15013 dusky-like (dyl).
miniature, dusky and dusky-like are expressed in
tissues involved in cuticle secretion
To determine how dy, m and dyl are expressed, we carried
out RNA in situ hybridisations at different stages with probes for these
genes. We also generated an antibody against the Min protein to study its
subcellular localisation.
The three gene products are expressed in partially overlapping domains
during embryogenesis and pupal development. In the embryo, they are only
expressed in tissues that will secrete cuticle, including the epidermis,
foregut and hindgut (Hillman and Lesnick,
1970) (Fig. 4A-F).
In the epidermis, expression starts at about stage 14, and RNA levels increase
until at least stage 17, when formation of the cuticle prevents the
penetration of our probes. In each segment, transcripts of all three genes are
more abundant in cells forming the dorsal and ventral denticle belts than in
other parts of the epidermis (Fig.
4A,C). These cells also contain high levels of Min protein
(Fig. 4B). dy and Min
are also expressed in the cells forming the duct linking the salivary glands
with the oesophagus (Fig.
4D,E), and Min protein is detected at low levels in the cells
forming the embryonic tracheae (data not shown).
|
RNA in situ hybridisation and antibody staining show that dy and Min are also expressed in pupal wings by 28 hours APF, which is consistent with their genetic requirement in this tissue (Fig. 4G,H). However, we could not detect expression of dyl in pupal wings of the same stage (Fig. 4I), indicating that this gene could have an embryo-specific role.
We have characterised in detail the expression and localisation of the Min protein in imaginal tissues from late third larval instar onwards. During this period the imaginal epidermis secretes two different types of cuticle. The first, the pupal cuticle, is a thin unpigmented sheet that starts forming at 7 hours APF, and it is finally shed at about 18 hours APF. The second the future adult cuticle begins to form by 32-34 hours APF. In both cases, the first layer to be secreted is the cuticulin envelope. We find that Min is expressed in two separate phases that occur prior to the assembly of these cuticulin envelopes.
During the first phase, Min protein accumulates in the cytoplasm of all epidermal cells from late in the third larval instar until 6 hours APF (Fig. 5A). Between 6 and 7 hours APF, an abrupt transition occurs; most of the Min protein now localises to the apical side of the cell, where it forms a continuous layer (Fig. 5B). After 7 hours APF, the specific staining disappears, probably because Min protein has become chemically crosslinked to itself or to other components of the forming cuticle.
|
We observe a similar pattern in late pupal wings, before the secretion of the adult cuticle. Min protein first appears in the wing at about 28 hours APF (Fig. 5C-F). It accumulates to high levels in the cell cytoplasm until, by 32-34 hours APF, it localises to the apical membrane, forming a continuous layer covering the epidermal cells (Fig. 5D,F) and the developing bristles (Fig. 5H,I).
The pattern of accumulation of Min protein in the haltere epidermis is similar to that in the wing (data not shown), even though no mutant phenotype is visible in this tissue.
Formation of the cuticulin envelope is not prevented in
Df(1)MR wings
The data above show that Min protein localises to the apical membrane at
the same time or slightly before the cuticulin envelope is forming in the
pupal and adult wings (Mitchell et al.,
1983). To determine whether the formation of the cuticulin
envelope is affected in the absence of m and dy activities,
we examined the ultrastructure of the forming cuticle in Df(1)MR
mutants at 36 and 44 hours APF using TEM. In wild-type animals staged 36 hours
APF, discontinuous patches of cuticulin are observed associated with the tips
of microvilli (Fig. 6A); by 44
hours APF the cuticulin envelope is essentially complete, except above cell
boundaries, and cell expansion has begun
(Mitchell et al., 1983
)
(Fig. 6B). In Df(1)MR
mutants staged 36 hours APF, formation of the cuticulin envelope appears to be
less complete and microvilli shorter than in the wildtype
(Fig. 6B), but by 44 hours APF,
an envelope is clearly visible and not obviously different from that seen in
wildtype (Fig. 6C,D). However,
at this stage, membrane invaginations beneath the forming cuticle appear to be
more extensive in the mutant and less well organised than in the wildtype
(Fig. 6C,D). As the wild-type
cells have begun to expand by 44 hours APF, it is not clear whether this
difference in the apical cell organisation is a cause or a consequence of the
altered cell behaviour seen in the Df(1)MR wings, which fail to
expand (Fig. 6C,D, insets).
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The m and dy loci encode transmembrane proteins that
include a ZP motif in their extracellular domain. Searching for other related
proteins in Drosophila we have identified a third protein containing
a ZP domain, the product of the dyl gene, that is highly similar to
both Min and Dy. Our analysis shows that m, dy and dyl are
more related to one another than to any other ZP domain protein and are
expressed only in tissues secreting a cuticle. Preliminary analysis of the
genome sequence of the mosquito Anopheles gambiae
(Holt et al., 2002) reveals
the existence of two closely linked genes mapping in the X chromosome coding
for proteins highly similar to Min and Dy. This suggests that this specific
gene family has a long history within the Dipterans. Outside this group, no
specific orthologues of the min/dy/dyl family have yet been defined.
However, there are suggestions that the function of ZP proteins in cuticle
synthesis might be widely conserved. One of the C. elegans proteins
containing a ZP domain, Cut-1, has been identified as a structural component
of the nematode cuticle. Cut-1 protein is apically secreted and localises in
the most external cuticle layer, the cuticulin
(Sebastiano et al., 1991
). In
the Drosophila wing, the epidermal cells secrete the cuticulin
envelope prior to the reorganisation of the apical membrane that takes place
during differentiation. One attractive hypothesis is that m, dy and
dyl, like the Cut-1 protein, could be structural components of the
fly cuticulin envelope. We observe that Min accumulates in the cytoplasm and
is then transported to the apical membrane by the time of cuticulin envelope
assembly. Min protein then forms a continuous layer covering the whole
epidermal surface, consistent with the idea that Min is an envelope component.
Unfortunately, our antibodies fail to detect Min protein shortly after
secretion, so we cannot determine whether it becomes integrated into the
cuticle or not. Nevertheless, we observe that in Df(1)MR mutants the
formation of the cuticulin envelope is not prevented, indicating that neither
Min nor Dy are essential for the formation of this structure. Instead, we see
that the formation of the cuticulin envelope is delayed and that the apical
membrane is disorganised. Whether this is the primary cause or is simply
correlated with the failure of epidermal wing cells to undergo changes in cell
shape is difficult to establish.
A second possibility consistent with our observations is that m,
dy and dyl are components of a specialised apical matrix
secreted at the time of the cuticulin envelope formation and necessary for the
reorganisation of apical membranes during differentiation.
ZP-domain-containing proteins characterised in flies and vertebrates seem to
participate in the formation of apical extracellular matrices in different
cellular contexts. For instance ZP1, ZP2 and ZP3 proteins are the main
components of the mammalian oocyte zona pellucida and form a specialised
apical matrix that is required for oocyte maturation
(Rankin and Dean, 2000).
Another example is the Drosophila NompA protein, which is a component
of an extracellular structure called the dendritic cap of mechanosensory
receptors (Chung et al., 2001
).
This structure mediates the interaction between the neuronal sensory processes
and the external components of the sensory organ, where mechanical stimuli are
transduced into neuronal membrane potentials
(Chung et al., 2001
). However,
the NompA protein contains other conserved domains in its extracellular
portion (Chung et al., 2001
),
and the role of its ZP domain remains to be elucidated. Perhaps proteins of
the m/dy family, containing only a conserved ZP extracellular domain,
are specialised in mediating interactions between the forming cuticle, the
cell membrane and cytoskeleton components involved in cell shape
reorganisation.
We have shown that m, dy and dyl are expressed throughout
embryogenesis in many cuticle-forming tissues. It is thus paradoxical that the
phenotype we observe in the m/dy mutant is specific to the wings.
Indeed, the Df(1)MR mutant is viable, and we have not detected
defects elsewhere in the adult or in the embryonic cuticle. One possible
explanation for this specificity is that loss of the ZP proteins activity is
most deleterious in tissues undergoing extensive rearrangement of their apical
membranes, like the wing cells. We note that normal haltere cells do not
undergo major changes in shape after the assembly of the cuticulin envelope
(Roch and Akam, 2000), and
even though Min is expressed in this tissue in a similar way to the wing, the
haltere cells differentiate normally.
Functional redundancy is another possible explanation for the wing
specificity of the phenotypes. The product of the dyl gene is a good
candidate for fulfilling the roles of dy and m in their
absence. All three proteins are closely related, and all are expressed in the
embryonic epidermis during differentiation. Interestingly, dyl is not
detectably expressed in the wing, providing a simple explanation for the
sensitivity of this tissue to m and dy mutations.
Unfortunately, there are at present no specific mutations affecting the
dyl gene. Other more distantly related Drosophila ZP
proteins may also contribute to the formation of the cuticulin envelope or to
the apical matrix. In regard to the functional redundancy, a clear parallelism
can be established with the proteins forming the mammalian zona pellucida. In
mice, the presence of ZP3 and ZP2 is absolutely required for the formation of
this matrix, whereas loss-of-function mutants for ZP1 present milder defects
in its structure (Rankin et al.,
2001).
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Adams, M. D., Celniker, S. E., Holt, R. A., Evans, C. A.,
Gocayne, J. D., Amanatides, P. G., Scherer, S. E., Li, P. W., Hoskins, R. A.,
Galle, R. F. et al. (2000). The genome sequence of
Drosophila melanogaster. Science
287,2185
-2195.
Bork, P. and Sander, C. (1992). A large domain common to sperm receptor (Zp2 and Zp3) and TGF-B type III receptor. FEBS Lett. 300,237 -240.[CrossRef][Medline]
Brand, A. H. and Perrimon, N. (1993). Targeted
gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant
phenotypes. Development
118,401
-415.
Chung, Y. D., Zhu, J., Han, Y. and Kernan, M. J. (2001). nompA encodes a PNS-specific, ZP domain protein required to connect mechanosensory dendrites to sensory structures. Neuron 29,415 -428.[Medline]
DiBartolomeis, S. M., Akten, B., Genova, G., Roberts, M. A. and Jackson, F. R. (2002). Molecular analysis of the Drosophila miniature-dusky (m-dy) gene complex: m-dy mRNAs encode transmembrane proteins with similarity to C. elegans cuticulin. Mol. Genet. Genomics 267,564 -576.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dobzhansky, T. (1929). The influence of the quantity and quality of chromosomal material on the size of the cells in Drosophila melanogaster. Roux. Arch. Entw. Mech. Organ 115,363 -379.
Dorn, G. L. and Burdick, A. L. (1962). On the
recombinational structure and complementation relationships in the
m-dy complex of Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics 47,503
-518.
Fristrom, D., Wilcox, M. and Fristrom, J.
(1993). The distribution of PS integrins, laminin A and F-actin
during key stages in Drosophila wing development.
Development 117,509
-523.
Hillman, R. and Lesnick, L. H. (1970). Cuticle formation in the embryo of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Morph. 131,383 -396.
Holt, R. A., Subramanian, G. M., Halpern, A., Sutton, G. G., Charlab, R., Nusskern, D. R., Wincker, P., Clark, A. G., Ribeiro, J. M., Wides, R. et al. (2002). The genome of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Science 295,129 -149.[CrossRef]
Hosaka, M., Nagahama, M., Kim, W. S., Watanabe, T., Hatsuzawa,
K., Ikemizu, J., Murakami, K. and Nakayama, K. (1991).
Arg-X-Lys/Arg-Arg motif is a signal for precursor cleavage catalyzed by furin
within the constitutive secretory pathway. J. Biol.
Chem. 266,12127
-12132.
Johnson, S. A. and Milner, M. J. (1987). The final stages of wing development in Drosophila melanogaster. Tissue Cell 19,505 -513.
Lindsley, D. L. and Zimm, G. G. (1992). In The genome of Drosophila melanogaster. San Diego: Academic Press.
Locke, M. (1966). The structure and formation of the cuticulin layer in the epicuticle of an insect Calpodes ethlius (Lepidoptera, Hesperidae). J. Morph. 118,461 -494.[Medline]
Locke, M. (1998). Epidermis. In Microscopic anatomy of invertebrates, vol. 11A, Insecta (eds F. W. Harrison and M. Locke), pp.75 -138. New York: Wiley-Liss, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Locke, M. (2001). The Wigglesworth lecture: insects for studying fundamental problems in biology. J. Insect Physiol. 47,495 -507.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mitchell, H. K., Roach, J. and Petersen, N. S. (1983). The morphogenesis of cell hairs on Drosophila wings. Dev. Biol. 95,387 -398.[Medline]
Newby, L. M., White, L., DiBartolomeis, S. M., Walker, B. J.,
Dowse, H. B., Ringo, J. M., Khuda, N. and Jackson, F. R.
(1991). Mutational analysis of the Drosophila
miniature-dusky (m-dy) locus: effects on cell size and circadiam
rhythms. Genetics 128,571
-582.
Oda, H. and Tsukida, S. (1999). Dynamic
features of adherens junctions during Drosophila embryonic epithelial
morphogenesis revealed by a D-catenin-GFP fusion protein.
Dev. Genes Evol. 209,218
-225.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rankin, T. L., O'Brien, M., Lee, E., Wigglesworth, K., Eppig, J.
and Dean, J. (2001). Defective zonae pellucidae in
Zp2-null mice disrupt folliculogenesis, fertility and development.
Development 128,1119
-1226.
Rankin, T. and Dean, J. (2000). The zona
pellucida: using molecular genetics to study the mammalian egg coat.
Rev. Reprod. 5,114
-121.
Roberts, M. and Jackson, F. R. (1997). A new miniature-dusky allele. Drosophila Information Service 80,104 -105.
Roch, F. and Akam, M. (2000).
Ultrabithorax and the control of cell morphology in
Drosophila halteres. Development
127,97
-107.
Schultz, J., Milpetz, F., Bork, P. and Ponting, C. P.
(1998). SMART, a simple modular architecture research tool:
identification of signaling domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci
USA 95,5857
-5864.
Sebastiano, M., Lassandro, F. and Bazzicalupo, P. (1991). cut-1 a Caenorhabditis elegans gene coding for a Dauer-specific noncollagenous component of the cuticle. Dev. Biol. 146,519 -530.[Medline]
Sturtevant, M. A., Roark, M. and Bier, E. (1993). The Drosophila rhomboid gene mediates the localized formation of wing veins and interacts genetically with components of the EGF-R signalling pathway. Genes Dev. 7, 961-973.[Abstract]
Wassarman, P. M., Jovine, L. and Litscher, E. S. (2001). A profile of fertilization in mammals. Nat. Cell Biol. 3,E59 -E64.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wilkin, M. B., Becker, M. N., Mulvey, D., Phan, I., Chao, A., Cooper, K., Chung, H. J., Campbell, I. D., Baron, M. and MacIntyre, R. (2000). Drosophila Dumpy is a gigantic extracellular protein required to maintain tension at epidermal-cuticle attachment sites. Curr. Biol. 10,559 -567.[CrossRef][Medline]
Related articles in JCS: