Institut de Génétique Humaine, UPR CNRS1142, 141 Rue de la Cardonille 34396 Montpellier CEDEX 5, France
Author for correspondence (e-mail: florence.beranger{at}igh.cnrs.fr)
Accepted 9 January 2004
![]() |
Summary |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Prion, Nucleus, Microtubules
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Wild-type PrPC molecules can be subject to the endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation (ERAD)-proteasome pathway (Ma and Lindquist, 2001; Yedidia et al., 2001
), in the course of which they are mislocated in the cytosol. Accumulation of cytosolic PrP molecules is highly toxic and induces neuronal cell death (Ma et al., 2002
). In prion-infected cells, PrP is subject to retrograde transport from the plasma membrane towards the ER, and this compartment may play a significant role in PrPSc conversion (Beranger et al., 2002
). Presence of PrPSc in the ER may lead to an accumulation of misfolded PrP molecules which could be subsequently mislocated in the cytoplasm. Interestingly, PrP contains amino-proximal nuclear localization signals (NLS) (Basler et al., 1986
; Gu et al., 2003
) and has been detected previously in the nuclei of prion-infected cells by immunofluorescence studies (Pfeifer et al., 1993
). Some pathogenic mutant prion proteins have been also detected in the nucleus following proteasome inhibition (Lorenz et al., 2002
; Zanusso et al., 1999
). Therefore, it is possible that cytosolic PrP accumulates in the nucleus when the proteasome function is altered, and the presence of nuclear PrP has deleterious effects and important pathological consequences.
To test whether the nuclear localization of PrP is due to an alteration of proteasome activity, we studied the effect of proteasome inhibitors on nuclear accumulation of PrP in non-infected or prion-infected N2a cells. Several neuronal cell lines persistently infected with mouse-adapted scrapie have been developed for investigation of the biochemical properties of PrPSc (Butler et al., 1988; Race et al., 1987
). In this study we used a mouse neuroblastoma cell line (N2a) infected by the 22L prion strain, whose generation has been described (Nishida et al., 2000
) (see Materials and Methods). In this system, we detected PrP molecules in the nuclei of prion-infected cells only, independently of proteasome activity. This nuclear PrP has the biochemical properties of PrPSc and we observed that its transport to the nucleus required an intact microtubule network. Furthermore, we showed that the nuclear PrP was associated with chromatin in vivo.
![]() |
Materials and Methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Immunofluorescence microscopy
ScN2a cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 30 minutes, washed three times with PBS and permeabilised in 0.5% Triton X-100-PBS for 5 minutes. Permeabilised cells were treated for 5 minutes in 3M guanidine thiocyanate and further incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies diluted in 5% milk in PBS. After three washes in PBS, cells were incubated with Rhodamine conjugated anti-mouse antibodies (dilution 1/300) for 1 hour at 37°C. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33286. Cells were washed and mounted in FluorSave reagent (Calbiochem). Images were collected and processed using a Leica microscope. For confocal analysis, images were obtained using a Leica laser-scanning microscope.
Preparation of nuclei
Pure nuclei from N2a or ScN2a cells were prepared with Pure Prep Nuclei Isolation Kit (Sigma, France) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For immunofluorescence studies, a small volume of the final suspension of nuclei was placed onto polylysine-coated microscope slides and allowed to adhere for 2 hours at 4°C. The slides were then washed in PBS before being subjected to the immunofluorescence microscopy procedure described above.
For the deglycosylation experiment, nuclei lysates were treated with N-glycosidase F (0.01 units/ml) for 16 hours at 37°C before analysis.
Analysis of the nuclear association of the prion protein
For DNase, NaCl and EDTA treatments, pure nuclei from ScN2a cells were lysed for 10 minutes on ice in 200 µl of modified CSK buffer (10 mM Pipes pH 6.8, 100 mM NaCl, 300 mM sucrose, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF and protease inhibitors) containing 0.1% Triton X-100 (0.1% Tx-CSK) (Blencowe et al., 1994). After low speed centrifugation, the nuclei were resuspended in 200 µl of 0.1% Tx-CSK. Aliquots were incubated at the indicated temperature in the presence of DNase, various concentration of NaCl or EDTA. For DNase digestion, the samples were supplemented with 1 mM MgCl2. After incubation, the pellet fraction and the soluble supernatant were separated by low speed centrifugation.
![]() |
Results and discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
These results demonstrated clearly that the cytosolic protease-resistant PrP species induced by ALLN treatment in non-infected or prion-infected N2a cells and described in previous studies (Beranger et al., 2002; Cohen and Taraboulos, 2003
; Ma and Lindquist, 2001
; Yedidia et al., 2001
) was not transported to the nucleus. However, PrPSc molecules accumulated in the nucleus of prion-infected cells, even if the proteasome function was not impaired. Deglycosylation using N-glycosidase digestion of nuclei extracts showed a shift in the PrPSc bands demonstrating that nuclear PrPSc was fully glycosylated (Fig. 1E), and thereby confirming that it is different from the unglycosylated cytoplasmic species. This glycosylated PrPSc could originate from retrograde transport within the ER as we have previously demonstrated (Beranger et al., 2002
), or from a direct transport from the plasma membrane to the nucleus as described for some viral proteins (Harel and Forbes, 2001
).
In order to confirm the presence of PrPSc in the nuclei of prion-infected cells, whole cells or isolated nuclei were analyzed by indirect immunofluorescence. The immunofluorescence detection of PrPSc requires denaturation of PrPSc molecules to enhance the binding of PrP antibodies (Taraboulos et al., 1990). Indeed, after optimal fixation and permeabilisation using paraformaldehyde and 0.1 Triton X-100, a 3M guanidine thiocyanate treatment was performed to expose epitopes that were previously hidden on PrPSc. Immunofluorescence microscopy studies were carried out using an antibody that is specific for the C-terminus extremity of PrPSc. In non-infected cells, no immunoreactive material could be detected (Fig. 2Aa). In prion-infected cells, most PrPSc was found to be intracellular and mainly localized to perinuclear structures reminiscent of the Golgi apparatus (Fig. 2Ab, Fig. 3Bg-i) as already published (Taraboulos et al., 1990
). However, detailed inspection of the cells revealed the presence of PrPSc nuclear localization in approximately 10% of the prion-infected cells (Fig. 2Ab, white arrows, and panels c-d). In those cells, 80-100% of the PrPSc is located in the nucleus. To demonstrate that the fluorescent signal really originated from the nuclear interior rather than from sources external to the nuclear envelope, staining was analysed by confocal laser-scanning microscopy. A confocal optical section along the same z-axis of prion-infected cells is shown in Fig. 2B and confirms the presence of PrPSc in the nucleus of some cells (white arrow). It is interesting to note that, in each case, the PrPSc signal seems to be concentrated in areas where the Hoechst label is less intense, which suggests that the protein is excluded from the heterochromatin zones and accumulates in euchromatin areas, a highly transcribed region of the nucleus. Indirect immunofluorescence experiments were also performed on isolated nuclei (Fig. 3Ba-c), and again PrPSc could be detected within the nucleus.
|
|
Accumulation of the cytoplasmic protease-resistant PrP molecules in the cytosol is not by itself sufficient to target the protein into the nucleus. Because the N-terminal nuclear localisation signal sequence of PrP is not efficient in localising the protein to the nuclear compartment (Jaegly et al., 1998), we considered that nuclear transport of PrPSc molecules in infected cells may involve a complex mechanism requiring a specific conformation of the protein or its association with accessory molecules. Since nucleocytoplasmic trafficking can involve cytoskeleton structures (Aplin et al., 2001
), we determined whether PrP accumulation in the nucleus required either an intact actin cytoskeleton or a functional microtubule network. ScN2a cells were treated for 6 hours either with the actin depolymerizing agent cytochalasin D or the microtubule-disrupting drug colchicine. Colchicine treatment inhibited accumulation of PrP in the nucleus, whereas cytochalasin D treatment had no effect (data not shown). An overnight treatment of ScN2a cells with various concentrations of colchicine did not modify the amount of PrP in total cell lysates nor the proportion of PrPSc in PK treated cell extracts (Fig. 3A) while accumulation of PrP in the nucleus was strongly reduced in the presence of the highest concentrations of the drug. Immunofluorescence microscopy analysis showed that colchicine treatment of the cells decreased PrPSc labelling in the nuclei to background level (Fig. 3Bd-f). At the whole cell level, colchicine treatment induced the accumulation of the protein in large cytoplasmic inclusions (Fig. 3B, panels j-l).
These observations indicate that, as described for other proteins (Campbell and Hope, 2003; Giannakakou et al., 2000
; Hanz et al., 2003
; Lam et al., 2002
), nuclear translocation of PrP requires a functional microtubule network, disruption of which results in reduced nuclear accumulation. In agreement with our results, it has been found that
and ß tubulins bind the peptide PrP106-126 (Brown et al., 1998
). Whether some PrP molecules are associated with cellular microtubules in infected cells and are transported to the nucleus by association with the microtubule-based motor proteins is currently under investigation.
Given the in vitro DNA-binding properties of recombinant PrP (Gabus et al., 2001a; Gabus et al., 2001b
; Sklaviadis et al., 1993
), we were interested to know how nuclear PrP would fractionate with respect to various chromatin extraction procedures. DNA-bound proteins can be released from chromatin by different treatments such as DNase and NaCl (Lichota and Grasser, 2001
; Tatsumi et al., 2000
). ScN2a cell nuclei were incubated with DNase I or increasing concentrations of NaCl (Fig. 4A,B). DNase treatment increased the proportion of nuclear PrP in the insoluble pellet fractions, suggesting that upon DNA digestion, PrP was released and aggregated. These results could be explained by a recent study showing that recombinant murine prion protein and prion peptides bound with high affinity to DNA sequences, and were maintained in a soluble form (Cordeiro et al., 2001
). In this paper, the authors demonstrated that double-stranded DNA sequences completely inhibited aggregation of prion peptides, whereas DNA binding prevention induced their aggregation. These data are in agreement with our experiments in ScN2a cells nuclei: they suggest that nuclear PrP binds to DNA in vivo and that liberation of nuclear PrP from DNA induces aggregation of the protein into an insoluble form.
|
The extractability of nuclear PrP from chromatin in Triton X-100-treated nuclei was determined by incubation with increasing concentrations of NaCl (Fig. 4B). Most of nuclear PrP was still insoluble with 200 mM NaCl, whereas more than 90% of PrP became soluble with 400 mM NaCl. These results suggest that nuclear PrP is most likely associated with chromatin. DNA-protein interactions frequently require divalent cations such as Mg2+. To get further insight into the mechanism of DNA-nuclear PrP interaction, Triton X-100-extracted nuclei were supplemented with an excess of EDTA. In the presence of EDTA, PrP molecules were liberated from the nuclei (Fig. 4C). These findings suggest that divalent cations may play a role in the chromatin/DNA association of nuclear PrP. Whether Cu2+, Zn2+ or Mn2+, all of which have been shown to bind PrPSc, are required for chromatin association of PrPSc remains to be determined.
Whether nuclear PrP binds to specific nuclear proteins or DNA sequences in the nuclei of prion-infected cells is currently under investigation. A search for candidate proteins binding to prion protein led, among other proteins, to the identification of Nrf2 (Yehiely et al., 1997), a key transcription factor that mediates Cu/Zn super-oxide dismutase (SOD1) induction in response to environmental stress (Park and Rho, 2002
). A nuclear interaction between PrP and Nrf2 could have implications in the role played by oxidative stress in the neurodegeneration observed in TSE (for a review, see Milhavet and Lehmann, 2002
).
In conclusion, our data show for the first time that fully glycosylated and proteinase K-resistant molecules of PrP could be detected in the nuclei of prion-infected cells. These nuclear PrP molecules could result from a retrograde transport of mature PrPSc within the ER. Like p53 and others nuclear proteins, the translocation of PrPSc into the nucleus is dependent on the integrity of the microtubule network. The prevention of nuclear accumulation of PrP when the microtubule network is disrupted does not exclude the possibility that other proteins may be involved in an active nuclear import of PrPSc molecules.
More importantly, this is the first demonstration that PrP is associated in vivo with chromatin. Considering the neurodegeneration observed in TSEs, the presence of PrPSc in the nuclei of prion-infected cells could have potential pathological consequences. Nuclear PrPSc concentrates in euchromatin areas that correspond to a highly transcribed part of the nucleus. Several studies have shown that the in vitro interaction of PrP with nucleic acids results in the formation of nucleoprotein complexes (Gabus et al., 2001a; Murdoch et al., 1990
). Such complexes could in vivo impede the function of transcription factors and alter gene expression, resulting in a cascade of biological processes that could result in prion pathogenesis.
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
![]() |
Footnotes |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Aplin, A. E., Stewart, S. A., Assoian, R. K. and Juliano, R. L. (2001). Integrin-mediated adhesion regulates ERK nuclear translocation and phosphorylation of Elk-1. J. Cell Biol. 153, 273-282.
Basler, K., Oesch, B., Scott, M., Westaway, D., Walchli, M., Groth, D. F., McKinley, M. P., Prusiner, S. B. and Weissmann, C. (1986). Scrapie and cellular PrP isoforms are encoded by the same chromosomal gene. Cell 46, 417-428.[Medline]
Beranger, F., Mange, A., Goud, B. and Lehmann, S. (2002). Stimulation of PrP(C) retrograde transport toward the endoplasmic reticulum increases accumulation of PrP(Sc) in prion-infected cells. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 38972-38977.
Blencowe, B. J., Nickerson, J. A., Issner, R., Penman, S. and Sharp, P. A. (1994). Association of nuclear matrix antigens with exon-containing splicing complexes. J. Cell Biol. 127, 593-607.[Abstract]
Brown, D. R., Schmidt, B. and Kretzschmar, H. A. (1998). Prion protein fragment interacts with PrP-deficient cells. J. Neurosci. Res. 52, 260-267.[CrossRef][Medline]
Butler, D. A., Scott, M. R., Bockman, J. M., Borchelt, D. R., Taraboulos, A., Hsiao, K. K., Kingsbury, D. T. and Prusiner, S. B. (1988). Scrapie-infected murine neuroblastoma cells produce protease-resistant prion proteins. J. Virol. 62, 1558-1564.[Medline]
Campbell, E. M. and Hope, T. J. (2003). Role of the cytoskeleton in nuclear import. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 55, 761-771.[CrossRef][Medline]
Caughey, B., Race, R. E., Ernst, D., Buchmeier, M. J. and Chesebro, B. (1989). Prion protein biosynthesis in scrapie-infected and uninfected neuroblastoma cells. J. Virol. 63, 175-181.[Medline]
Chen, S. G., Teplow, D. B., Parchi, P., Teller, J. K., Gambetti, P. and Autilio-Gambetti, L. (1995). Truncated forms of the human prion protein in normal brain and in prion diseases. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 19173-19180.
Cohen, E. and Taraboulos, A. (2003). Scrapie-like prion protein accumulates in aggresomes of cyclosporin A-treated cells. EMBO J. 22, 404-417.
Cohen, F. E., Pan, K. M., Huang, Z., Baldwin, M., Fletterick, R. J. and Prusiner, S. B. (1994). Structural clues to prion replication. Science 264, 530-531.[Medline]
Cordeiro, Y., Machado, F., Juliano, L., Juliano, M. A., Brentani, R. R., Foguel, D. and Silva, J. L. (2001). DNA converts cellular prion protein into the beta-sheet conformation and inhibits prion peptide aggregation. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 49400-49409.
Drisaldi, B., Stewart, R. S., Adles, C., Stewart, L. R., Quaglio, E., Biasini, E., Fioriti, L., Chiesa, R. and Harris, D. A. (2003). Mutant PrP is delayed in its exit from the endoplasmic reticulum, but neither wild-type nor mutant PrP undergoes retrotranslocation prior to proteasomal degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 21732-21743.
Gabus, C., Auxilien, S., Pechoux, C., Dormont, D., Swietnicki, W., Morillas, M., Surewicz, W., Nandi, P. and Darlix, J. L. (2001a). The prion protein has DNA strand transfer properties similar to retroviral nucleocapsid protein. J. Mol. Biol. 307, 1011-21.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gabus, C., Derrington, E., Leblanc, P., Chnaiderman, J., Dormont, D., Swietnicki, W., Morillas, M., Surewicz, W. K., Marc, D., Nandi, P. et al. (2001b). The prion protein has RNA binding and chaperoning properties characteristic of nucleocapsid protein NCP7 of HIV-1. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 19301-19309.
Giannakakou, P., Sackett, D. L., Ward, Y., Webster, K. R., Blagosklonny, M. V. and Fojo, T. (2000). p53 is associated with cellular microtubules and is transported to the nucleus by dynein. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 709-717.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gu, Y., Hinnerwisch, J., Fredricks, R., Kalepu, S., Mishra, R. S. and Singh, N. (2003). Identification of cryptic nuclear localization signals in the prion protein. Neurobiol. Dis. 12, 133-149.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hanz, S., Perlson, E., Willis, D., Zheng, J. Q., Massarwa, R., Huerta, J. J., Koltzenburg, M., Kohler, M., van-Minnen, J., Twiss, J. L. et al. (2003). Axoplasmic importins enable retrograde injury signaling in lesioned nerve. Neuron 40, 1095-1104.[Medline]
Harel, A. and Forbes, D. J. (2001). Welcome to the nucleus: CAN I take your coat? Nat. Cell Biol. 3, E267-E269.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jaegly, A., Mouthon, F., Peyrin, J. M., Camugli, B., Deslys, J. P. and Dormont, D. (1998). Search for a nuclear localization signal in the prion protein. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 11, 127-133.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lam, M. H., Thomas, R. J., Loveland, K. L., Schilders, S., Gu, M., Martin, T. J., Gillespie, M. T. and Jans, D. A. (2002). Nuclear transport of parathyroid hormone (PTH)-related protein is dependent on microtubules. Mol. Endocrinol. 16, 390-401.
Lichota, J. and Grasser, K. D. (2001). Differential chromatin association and nucleosome binding of the maize HMGA, HMGB, and SSRP1 proteins. Biochemistry 40, 7860-7867.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lorenz, H., Windl, O. and Kretzschmar, H. A. (2002). Cellular phenotyping of secretory and nuclear prion proteins associated with inherited prion diseases. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 8508-8516.
Ma, J. and Lindquist, S. (2001). Wild-type PrP and a mutant associated with prion disease are subject to retrograde transport and proteasome degradation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 14955-14960.
Ma, J., Wollmann, R. and Lindquist, S. (2002). Neurotoxicity and neurodegeneration when PrP accumulates in the cytosol. Science 298, 1781-1785.
Milhavet, O. and Lehmann, S. (2002). Oxidative stress and the prion protein in transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 38, 328-339.[Medline]
Murdoch, G. H., Sklaviadis, T., Manuelidis, E. E. and Manuelidis, L. (1990). Potential retroviral RNAs in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. J. Virol. 64, 1477-1486.[Medline]
Nishida, N., Harris, D. A., Vilette, D., Laude, H., Frobert, Y., Grassi, J., Casanova, D., Milhavet, O. and Lehmann, S. (2000). Successful transmission of three mouse-adapted scrapie strains to murine neuroblastoma cell lines overexpressing wild-type mouse prion protein. J. Virol. 74, 320-325.
Park, E. Y. and Rho, H. M. (2002). The transcriptional activation of the human copper/zinc superoxide dismutase gene by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin through two different regulator sites, the antioxidant responsive element and xenobiotic responsive element. Mol. Cell Biochem. 240, 47-55.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pfeifer, K., Bachmann, M., Schroder, H. C., Forrest, J. and Muller, W. E. (1993). Kinetics of expression of prion protein in uninfected and scrapie-infected N2a mouse neuroblastoma cells. Cell Biochem. Funct. 11, 1-11.[Medline]
Prusiner, S. B., Scott, M. R., Dearmond, S. J. and Cohen, F. E. (1998). Prion protein biology. Cell 93, 337-348.[Medline]
Race, R. E., Fadness, L. H. and Chesebro, B. (1987). Characterization of scrapie infection in mouse neuroblastoma cells. J. Gen. Virol. 68, 1391-1399.[Abstract]
Sklaviadis, T., Akowitz, A., Manuelidis, E. E. and Manuelidis, L. (1993). Nucleic acid binding proteins in highly purified Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease preparations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 5713-5717.[Abstract]
Taraboulos, A., Serban, D. and Prusiner, S. B. (1990). Scrapie prion proteins accumulate in the cytoplasm of persistently infected cultured cells. J. Cell Biol. 110, 2117-2132.[Abstract]
Tatsumi, Y., Tsurimoto, T., Shirahige, K., Yoshikawa, H. and Obuse, C. (2000). Association of human origin recognition complex 1 with chromatin DNA and nuclease-resistant nuclear structures. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 5904-5910.
Yedidia, Y., Horonchik, L., Tzaban, S., Yanai, A. and Taraboulos, A. (2001). Proteasomes and ubiquitin are involved in the turnover of the wild-type prion protein. EMBO J. 20, 5383-5391.
Yehiely, F., Bamborough, P., da Costa, M., Perry, B. J., Thinakaran, G., Cohen, F. E., Carlson, G. A. and Prusiner, S. B. (1997). Identification of candidate proteins binding to prion protein. Neurobiol. Dis. 3, 339-355.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zanusso, G., Petersen, R. B., Jin, T., Jing, Y., Kanoush, R., Ferrari, S., Gambetti, P. and Singh, N. (1999). Proteasomal degradation and N-terminal protease resistance of the codon 145 mutant prion protein. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 23396-23404.