Reduced Metabolic Rate after Caloric Restriction—Can We Agree on How to Normalize the Data?

Éric T. Poehlman

Département de Nutrition, Unité Métabolique, Université de Montréal, Pavillon Lilliane de Stewart Montréal, Québec H3T 1A8, Canada

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Éric T. Poehlman, Ph.D., Département de Nutrition, Unité Métabolique, Université de Montréal, Pavillon Lilliane de Stewart, 2405 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte Catherine, Montréal, Québec H3T 1A8, Canada. E-mail: Eric.Poehlman{at}UMONTREAL.CA.

The extension of longevity by caloric restriction is one of the most intensively studied adaptations in the gerontology literature. Caloric restriction is the only environmental intervention that consistently decreases the biological rate of aging across a wide range of species. It remains the "gold standard" by which other anti-aging interventions are often compared. Despite the long history of research on caloric restriction (1) and the consistent pattern of responses across species, the mechanism(s) responsible for its effects remains enigmatic.

The interesting study by Blanc et al. (2) provides new information on the impact of caloric restriction on energy expenditure. The authors have performed a carefully controlled study that determined the effects of caloric restriction on total daily energy expenditure and its components in male rhesus monkeys. The second objective of the study examined the statistical methods to normalize metabolic rate changes in response to caloric restriction.

The first major finding noted is that 11 yr of caloric restriction (-30% less food than controls) reduced resting metabolic rate by 13% after values were adjusted for the loss of fat-free mass (12% loss). Body composition was assessed from dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, which provides a three-compartment (fat mass, fat-free mass, and bone mass) estimation of body composition. Total daily energy expenditure was measured from doubly labeled water, which provides a representative snapshot of free-living energy expenditure. When doubly labeled water is combined with indirect calorimetry, a breakdown of the components of daily energy expenditure (resting energy expenditure and nonbasal energy expenditure) emerges. Despite a decline in adjusted resting energy expenditure, the authors report no significant differences in adjusted total daily energy expenditure between control and calorically restricted animals. Thus, the decline in adjusted total daily energy expenditure was mainly attributed to the reduced resting energy expenditure adjusted for the loss of fat-free mass. The authors attribute the lack of significant changes in daily energy expenditure to the observed variability associated with the component of physical activity.

The authors acknowledge that the lower resting energy expenditure per kilogram in response to caloric restriction is not a consistent finding, even in their own colony. The authors, however, evoke an interesting hypothesis. That is, the lower resting energy expenditure is detectable in older cohorts of rhesus monkeys. Indeed, when younger animals (yr 9) were removed from their statistical analyses, the lower resting energy expenditure is even more apparent. This raises the interesting notion of an interaction between age and resting energy expenditure in response to caloric restriction. That is, are the energetic responses different depending on which age caloric restriction is initiated? Relative to this point is a recent study (3) that showed that a larger energy imbalance is required in older subjects to change body weight when compared with younger adults.

The strengths of this study include its longitudinal design (11 yr follow-up), the careful assessment of total daily energy expenditure with doubly labeled water, and a thoughtful discussion of statistical approaches to normalize metabolic rate for changes in body composition. The last point is not trivial. It has been suggested that adaptations in energy expenditure may, in part, explain the effects of dietary restriction on increasing life span (4). It has been postulated that a lower oxygen consumption may reduce the formation of reactive oxygen species, thus reducing oxidative damage and increasing life span (4). The authors point out, however, that the controversy among investigators is whether dietary restriction reduces metabolic rate, independent of changes in body size and composition. Thus, the method by which metabolic rates are statistically adjusted for changes in body composition becomes an important methodological issue. Simply put, is the decline in energy expenditure proportionally greater than the loss of fat mass and fat-free mass in response to caloric restriction?

A consensus on statistical approaches to normalize metabolic rate for changes in body composition have been historically (5) and recently discussed (6, 7, 8, 9, 10). In brief, there are a plethora of statistical approaches that have been applied to normalize metabolic rate data for changes in body composition. It is not the intent of this editorial to present an overview of these approaches. The investigators in the present study make a strong case for the use of a regression-based approach to normalize metabolic rate data in response to caloric restriction. The authors suggest that a regression-based approach more appropriately adjusts for the non-zero intercept between the dependent and independent variables and, thus, takes into account the true mathematical relationship between changes in the independent and dependent variables. There seems to be an emerging consensus that a regression-based approach is a more appropriate statistical approach to adjust metabolic rate data when there are concomitant changes in body composition. Of course, as in any statistical approach, underlying assumptions should be tested and met. Despite this assertion, there is a reluctance by the scientific community to normalize metabolic rate data using regression-based procedures. This may be due partially to the convenience and tradition of placing a variable in the denominator and asserting that the confounding variable is now controlled. A common example is simply dividing resting energy expenditure by the quantity of fat-free mass (i.e. resting metabolic rate/fat-free mass). This approach, however, may provide erroneous results (8). The authors perform an interesting analysis of past animal and human studies and re-analyze these data using analysis of covariance procedures. The result shows that caloric restriction reduced adjusted daily energy expenditure in multiple studies on the order of 171 to 293 kJ/d. Thus, one may conclude that inappropriate statistical approaches previously used may have masked the effects of caloric restriction on energy expenditure.

Clearly, the next step is to pursue the question of whether a reduction in energy expenditure plays a role, if any, in the life-extending properties of caloric restriction. Feasibility trials of long-term caloric restriction in humans are underway in the United States. It is likely that energetic adaptations to caloric restriction are being examined at these individual sites. Another avenue of investigation may relate to the role of caloric restriction in female rhesus monkeys. Given that the present study was performed in male rhesus monkeys and gender differences have been noted in resting metabolic rate (11, 12) and in the energy content of weight change (3), it will be of interest to eventually examine gender-related differences in caloric restriction. Until then, these valuable studies in rhesus monkeys will continue to provide very useful information on the metabolic adaptations to caloric restriction and its eventual impact on increased longevity.

Acknowledgments

Footnotes

E.T.P. is supported by the Canadian Institute of Health Research and a Canadian Research Chair in Nutrition and Metabolism.

Received October 25, 2002.

Accepted October 28, 2002.

References

  1. McCay CM, Crowell MF, Maynard LA 1935 The effect of retarded growth upon the length of life span and upon the ultimate body size. J Nutr 10:63–79
  2. Blanc S, Schoeller D, Kemnitz J, Weindruch R, Colman R, Newton W, Wink K, Baum S, Ramsey J 2003 Energy expenditure of rhesus monkeys subjected to 11 years of dietary restriction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:16–23[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Pietrobelli A, Allison DB, Heshka S, Heo M, Wang ZM, Bertkau A, Laverrére B, Rosenbaum M, Aloia JF, Pi-Sunyer FX, Heymsfield SB 2002 Sexual dimorphism in the energy content of weight change. Int J Obes 26:1339–1348[CrossRef]
  4. Ramsey JJ, Harper ME, Weindruch R 2000 Restriction of energy intake, energy expenditure and aging. Free Radic Biol Med 29:946–968[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Kleiber M 1947 Body size and composition. Physiol Rev 27:511–540[Free Full Text]
  6. Ravussin E, Bogardus C 1989 Relationship of genetics, age and physical fitness to daily energy expenditure and fuel utilization. Am J Clin Nutr 49(Suppl 5): 968–975
  7. Toth MJ, Goran MI, Ades PA, Howard DB, Poehlman ET 1993 Examination of data normalization procedures for expressing peak VO2 data. J Appl Physiol 75:2288–2292[Abstract]
  8. Poehlman ET, Toth MJ 1995 Mathematical ratios lead to spurious conclusions regarding age and sex-related differences in resting metabolic rate. Am J Clin Nutr 61:482–485[Abstract]
  9. Allison DB, Paultre F, Goran MI, Poehlman ET, Heymsfield SB 1995 Statistical considerations regarding the use of ratios to adjust data. Int J Obes 19:644–652[Medline]
  10. Goran MI, Allison DB, Poehlman ET 1995 Issues relating to normalization of body fat content in men and women. Int J Obes 19:638–643[Medline]
  11. Arciero PJ, Goran MI, Poehlman ET 1993 Resting metabolic rate is lower in females than males. J Appl Physiol 75:2514–2520[Abstract]
  12. Ferraro R, Lillioja S, Fontvieille AM, Rising R, Bogardus C, Ravussin E 1992 Lower sedentary metabolic rate in women compared with men. J Clin Invest 90:780–784[Medline]