Pathophysiology of Graves’ Ophthalmopathy: The Cycle of Disease

Rebecca S. Bahn

Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Rebecca Bahn, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905. E-mail: bahn.rebecca{at}mayo.edu.

Hyperthyroidism in Graves’ disease is due to the binding of stimulatory autoantibodies to the TSH receptor (TSHr) on thyroid follicular cells. The stimulation of this G protein-coupled receptor by autoantibodies leads to excessive and uncontrolled production of thyroid hormone. Our understanding of Graves’ disease has increased remarkably after the cloning in 1989 of TSHr (1, 2, 3). This achievement led to insights regarding TSHr biology, including the unique two-subunit structure of this receptor that may render it especially prone to autoimmune attack (4). In contrast, the pathophysiology of Graves’ ophthalmopathy (GO) and thyroid-associated pretibial dermopathy (PTD) is less well understood. However, studies by several groups have begun to unravel the many complex factors contributing to development of these ocular and dermal manifestations of Graves’ disease.

The progression of GO and PTD from initiation to subclinical disease to fully developed ocular and dermal manifestations appears not to be a linear process. It seems rather to be a positive feedback cycle composed of mechanical, immunological, and cellular processes (Fig. 1Go). In this review each of the major components of this disease cycle will be examined with an eye toward understanding the limitations of current therapy and identifying targets for future therapy.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Mechanical, immunological, and cellular processes contribute to the positive feedback cycle resulting in the development of GO and PTD.

 
Mechanical contributions to GO pathogenesis

Many of the clinical symptoms and signs of GO can be explained on a mechanical basis by the increase in volume of intraorbital tissues characteristic of the disease (5). Although most individuals with GO have evidence of both extraocular muscle and orbital adipose tissue enlargement, some exhibit a predominance of either muscle or fat expansion (6). Individuals younger than 40 yr of age are considerably more likely to exhibit orbital fat expansion in the absence of muscle enlargement, whereas patients over 70 yr are more prone to severe, fusiform muscle enlargement without significant changes in orbital adipose tissue volume (7). Proptosis, the forward displacement of the globe, stems from this increase in orbital tissue volume within the unyielding confines of the bony orbit. Extraocular muscle dysfunction is caused, early in the disease, by swelling of the muscle bodies. Enlargement of the muscles at the apex of the orbit may lead to compressive optic neuropathy and visual loss. In later stages the extraocular muscles may become fibrotic and atrophic as a result of chronic inflammation and compression of the muscle fibers. Chemosis and periorbital edema appear to be caused primarily by decreased venous and lymphatic drainage from the orbit secondary to compression of these channels. Similarly, patients with severe PTD have compromise of low pressure lymphatics in the lower extremities (8), which probably contributes to the dependent edema seen in this condition.

Histological examination of orbital adipose and extraocular muscle tissues in GO reveals an excess of complex carbohydrates called glycosaminoglycans (GAG), in which hyaluronan predominates (9). This large, hydrophilic, polyanionic compound is composed of repeating disaccharides. One molecule of hyaluronan occupies a volume of 330,000 x 10-19 ml, or 75,000 times greater than an equivalent weight of collagen. Gross enlargement of the muscle bodies in GO is caused primarily by accumulation of GAG and edema within the connective tissues investing and separating the muscle fibers. A similar accumulation of GAG is apparent within the fatty connective tissues of the orbit. The overall increase in orbital fat volume appears to be attributable to both hydrated hyaluron and de novo adipogenesis in these tissues.

The expansion of fat and muscle tissues within the bony confines of the orbit leads to increased intraorbital pressure. This results in compression of orbital contents with traumatic injury to these soft tissues. The pressure may be relieved by forward protrusion of the globe. In this sense, proptosis could be considered to represent a natural orbital decompression. The degree of decompression is limited by the forward mobility of the globe, which is tethered in place by the rectus muscles and canthal tendons of the lid. Indeed, GO patients with minimal proptosis, but especially large extraocular muscles or orbital fat volume, are at particular risk for the development of compressive optic neuropathy.

Mechanical factors and trauma to soft tissues may likewise be involved in the pathogenesis of PTD. Rapoport and colleagues (10) reported the case of a Graves’ patient with severe, elephantiasic PTD who suffered worsening coincident with increased periods of prolonged standing. Excision of a part of the lesion with subsequent grafting of skin from the patient’s uninvolved thigh resulted in recurrence of the disease at the original site as well as development of dermopathy at the donor site. The inferior limit of the PTD was just above the margin of this patient’s shoes, with relative sparing of the feet. The researchers hypothesized that dependent edema with slower return of lymphatic fluid to the circulation might reduce the clearance and prolong the half-life of disease-related cytokines or chemokines within the affected tissues. This pooling of immune mediators would be expected to increase their local disease-producing effects.

Unique anatomical features of the orbit and lower extremities appear to contribute to their prominent involvement in the peripheral manifestations Graves’ disease. The unyielding confines of the bony orbit predisposes to compression of orbital low pressure lymphatic and venous channels. Similarly, prolonged standing with dependent edema contributes to the compromise of channels in the lower extremities. Moreover, perhaps individual anatomical variability, such as the shape of the orbits or variations in venous or lymphatic vessels, may place some individuals with Graves’ disease at special risk for the development of severe GO or PTD.

Trauma itself may act as a stimulus for the initiation of an autoimmune reaction. Indeed, it has long been known that GO patients who experience significant trauma to the skin in any region, whether accidental or due to surgery, may develop the characteristic dermal changes of PTD at that site (9). Recent studies suggest that antigen-presenting cells may be nonspecifically activated after injury to a nearby cell (11). The insult may be traumatic, delivered by a pathogen or toxin, or result from a defect in the nearby cell’s programming. The injured cell sends activating signals to local antigen-presenting cells, which, in turn, take up antigens and up-regulate costimulatory molecules. This may lead to activation of T cells and initiation of an antigen-specific response. Thus, it appears that tissue injury may initiate an autoimmune response in the absence of foreignness. In this case, the autoimmune process is a result, rather than a cause, of the disease or condition.

Orbital decompression surgery is a very efficacious, albeit invasive, treatment for severe GO. By removing a portion of the bony wall, this surgery increases the orbital volume available to contain the enlarged tissues. As a result, the orbital contents are returned to near-original positions, and intraorbital pressure is reduced. This allows for improved venous drainage with decreased local edema and alleviation of soft tissue trauma. In a study by Garrity et al. (12), in which 428 consecutive patients underwent transantral orbital decompression surgery at the Mayo Clinic, proptosis was reduced by a mean of 4.7 mm, and visual acuity, papilledema, visual scotomas, and exposure keratitis improved in almost 90% of the patients. The surgery was performed for treatment of optic neuropathy in 51% of patients and for relief of severe orbital congestion with inflammation in 27%. Periorbital swelling and conjunctival erythema were alleviated rapidly by the surgery, underscoring the important role played by mechanical venous and lymphatic obstruction in development of the clinical disease. In contrast, the excision of skin affected by PTD is deleterious, probably augmenting the tissue trauma associated with the condition.

Immunological contributions

A diffuse infiltration of lymphocytes, with occasional nests of lymphoid aggregates, is seen within the orbital adipose tissues of patients with GO. A similar, if more sparse, cellular infiltrate is present in the interstitial tissues of the extraocular muscles. The majority of the cells are T lymphocytes, with occasional B lymphocytes seen. Both helper/inducer (CD4+) and suppressor/cytotoxic (CD8+) T lymphocytes are present, with a slight predominance of the latter (13).

To better understand immune mechanisms operative within the orbit in GO, several groups of investigators have profiled the cytokines secreted by tissue-infiltrating T cells. Two groups reported that the majority of retroocular T cell clones produce cytokines involved in cell-mediated T helper cell type 1 (Th1)-type immune processes, namely IL-2, interferon-{gamma} (IFN{gamma}), and TNF{alpha}, but not IL-4 or IL-5 (14, 15). A third group detected mRNA encoding a T helper cell type 2 (Th2)-dominant profile (IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10) characteristic of humoral responses (16), whereas another group of investigators identified clones secreting cytokines characteristic of both subtypes (17). These and other related studies suggest that T cells representing both subtypes are represented in the retroocular infiltrates in GO. It appears that Th1 cells may predominate in early disease, whereas Th2 cells may become predominant late in the course of the disease (18).

Besides participating in T and B cell responses, some Th1 and Th2 cytokines contribute to disease propagation by inducing classical immunomodulatory proteins in orbital and pretibial fibroblasts (19). Other participating inflammatory mediators and chemokines are elaborated by resident macrophages and fibroblasts. These factors, including IL-1{alpha}, IL-6, IL-8, IL-16, TGFß, RANTES, and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), trigger T cell migration across activated microvascular endothelium or participate directly in local inflammation (20, 21).

GO is clinically apparent in 25–50% of individuals with Graves’ hyperthyroidism. However, characteristic changes in orbital soft tissue anatomy are detectable using sensitive imaging techniques in the vast majority of hyperthyroid patients (22). Conversely, although 10% of patients with GO are euthyroid, the majority of these patients have laboratory evidence of thyroid autoimmune disease, including antibodies directed against thyroid antigens such as TSHr or thyroid peroxidase (23). Similarly, although only 4% of individuals with Graves’ hyperthyroidism have clinically apparent PTD, evidence of subclinical involvement of the pretibial skin is demonstrable by dermal ultrasonography in 76% of patients (24). Whether clinical GO or hyperthyroidism occurs first, the other manifestation occurs in 85% of patients within 18 months (25). Likewise, although PTD is rarely diagnosed in patients without GO, it is likely that these cases represent remote, undiagnosed, or subtle ocular disease (26). Finally, although Graves’ disease is a multigenic condition that develops as a result of many interactions between relatively weak susceptibility genes and environmental triggers (27), no unique susceptibility genes have been identified in Graves’ patients with clinical GO or PTD (28).

These clinical and genetic observations support the concept that GO, PTD, and Graves’ hyperthyroidism are manifestations of the same autoimmune disease. It follows, therefore, that all components of the clinical triad may stem from an immune reaction directed against the same or a similar autoantigen. As the target in Graves’ hyperthyroidism is TSHr in thyroid follicular cells, this protein is a logical candidate to be similarly targeted in the orbit and skin. Such cross-reactivity might be a T cell function involving recognition of antigenic TSHr peptide fragments, processed by antigen-presenting cells within the thyroid, orbit, and skin. Alternately, the cross-reactivity could be primarily at the B cell level, with cross-reactive antibodies recognizing intact cell surface antigen expressed in these tissues. However, in contrast to the well documented occurrence of neonatal thyrotoxicosis due to transplacental transfer of TSHr, the lack of any convincing reports of neonatal GO argues against a direct role for autoantibodies in the pathogenesis of this disease.

A prerequisite for involvement of TSHr as an antigen in GO and PTD is that it be present in the orbit and skin. Studies aimed at identifying TSHr in extrathyroidal tissues have been performed by several laboratories using reverse transcriptase PCR (29, 30, 31), ribonuclease protection assays for semiquantitative detection of this low abundance mRNA (32), Northern blotting (33), or immunohistochemistry (10, 31). The results of these studies were in general agreement and showed detectable TSHr mRNA and protein in GO orbital adipose/connective tissue specimens and derivative cultures. Low abundance TSHr was also apparent in normal orbital fatty connective tissue samples and cultures. However, relative TSHr mRNA levels were shown in one study to be greater in orbital adipose tissues from GO patients than in similar tissue samples derived from normal individuals (32). Similarly, TSHr protein may be more abundant in PTD skin than in normal pretibial skin (10). Other studies have shown low abundance mRNA transcripts or protein in thymus, kidney, pituitary, and other organs not clinically involved in Graves’ disease (34, 35).

Both normal and GO orbital fibroblasts increase the expression of functional TSHr, as measured in a TSH-dependent cAMP assay, when cultured under conditions shown to induce adipocyte differentiation (36). Treatment of these cultures with IL-6 enhances TSHr expression (37). This cytokine, produced by thyrocytes and orbital fibroblasts (38), is elevated in the sera of patients with Graves’ disease (39) and may serve as an important mediator of TSHr expression in this setting. Other cytokines, including IFN{gamma}, TNF{alpha}, and TGFß, inhibit TSHr expression in orbital fibroblasts (40), whereas purified immunoglobulins from GO patients with elevated thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin titers seem to have no such effect.

Several studies have examined correlations between the level of TSHr autoantibodies and the severity of GO. Although the results of these studies are conflicting, the most carefully designed found both thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulins and thyroid binding inhibitory immunoglobulins to be closely correlated with GO clinical activity (41). A weaker, but significant, correlation was noted as well between autoantibody levels and proptosis. Although these results support the concept that TSHr may be an important autoantigen in GO, they do not necessary indicate TSHr autoantibodies in pathogenesis. It appears from available experimental data that cellular immunity with local secretion of cytokines, rather than any direct effect of humoral immunity, plays the more important role in pathogenesis. The high titer autoantibodies measured in patients with severe GO may reflect the intensity of the TSHr-directed immune response.

Several other candidate autoantigens, including the muscle proteins G2s and D1, as well as a 64-kDa eye muscle membrane antigen have been studied as potential autoantigens in GO (42, 43). Antibodies directed against these muscle proteins are present in the sera of some GO patients, but are also detectable in normal sera. Most investigators agree that extraocular muscle antigens are probably not involved in the initiation of GO as primary autoimmune targets. Rather, it appears that these antibodies are produced secondary to the disease process, reflecting the release of sequestered cytoskeletal proteins from damaged eye muscles. Recently, immunoreactivity for intact thyroglobulin was detected in fibroadipose orbital tissue samples from GO patients (44). This finding echoes the interesting earlier hypothesis that thyroglobulin might travel from the thyroid to the orbits via cervical lymphatic channels and might function there as an autoantigen in GO (45).

Direct evidence that any candidate antigen or cell type is an autoimmune target in GO has been difficult to obtain, largely due to difficulties in obtaining affected orbital tissues and autologous lymphocytes. However, several studies have examined reactivity of peripheral or orbital T cell lines against various purified antigens or orbital tissue preparations. These T cell lines recognized autologous cultures of orbital fibroblasts in an MHC class I-restricted manner and also proliferated in response to thyroid membrane preparations and purified TSHr antigen (46, 47). No response to crude eye muscle extract, autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells, allogeneic fibroblasts, or purified protein derivative of mycobacterium tuberculosis was noted. Similarly, low molecular weight protein fractions derived from extraocular or abdominal muscles and particular candidate antigens, including recombinant D1 and thyroglobulin, were not recognized. Although instructive, the utility of these studies is limited by their reliance on peripheral T cells, on orbital T cell lines rather than clones, or on cells and cell fractions rather than recombinant or endogenously processed proteins. However, taken together, they do support a primary role for orbital fibroblasts as target cells or for TSHr as an orbital autoantigen in GO.

Studies concerning the pathogenesis of Graves’ disease and GO have long been hampered by the lack of an animal model reproducing the salient clinical and biochemical characteristics of the disease. However, as a useful model was developed recently in which naive BALB/c mice were inoculated with splenocytes primed with either a TSHr fusion protein or TSHr cDNA (48). Thyroiditis, associated with elevated thyroid hormone levels and production of low titer TSHr autoantibodies, was induced in the majority of these animals. However, these antibodies did not stimulate the receptor, but, rather, inhibited TSH binding to the receptor. Thus, the model does not entirely reflect the autoimmune milieu present in Graves’ disease. However, examination of mouse orbits revealed histological changes characteristic of GO, including lymphocytic and mast cell infiltration, accumulation of adipose tissue, hydrophilic mucopolysaccharides and edema, dissociation of muscle fibers, and evidence of TSHr immunoreactivity. Although falling short of clearly implicating TSHr as the orbital autoantigen in GO, this model does support the concept that enhanced TSHr expression in the orbit may contribute to the development of the disease.

In summary, the constitutive TSHr expression detectable at low levels in adipose and connective tissues from many anatomical sites as well as in other extrathyroidal tissues may have little physiological relevance in normal individuals. However, in the setting of Graves’ disease with circulating autoantibodies and T cells directed against this antigen, a more generalized, systemic autoimmune reaction may ensue. The finding that particular cytokines may affect TSHr expression in orbital fibroblasts suggests a role for these or other local or circulating immune factors in the modulation of expression within the orbit in GO. It may be that overexpression of TSHr plays a primary pathogenic role in GO and PTD. Alternately, locally enhanced expression of this protein may be secondary to the local disease process, but important nonetheless in disease progression.

The association between smoking and GO is quite strong, representing the major risk factor known for this condition. The odds ratio, relative to controls, has been reported to be as high as 20.2 for current smokers, and 8.9 for current and ex-smokers, suggesting a direct and immediate effect of smoking (49). In addition, several studies have shown that among patients with GO, smokers have more severe eye disease than nonsmokers. The mechanisms involved in this association are unknown. That smoking is linked to other autoimmune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn’s disease, suggests there may be a generalized stimulation of autoimmune processes in smokers. Direct effects of tobacco products or hypoxia on orbital fibroblast metabolism have been reported as well (50).

Immunosuppressive therapies, including oral or iv corticosteroids, cyclosporin, octreotide (in Europe), and orbital irradiation, are mainstays of the medical treatment of GO. However, only approximately 65% of patients respond to these agents, and the response is generally modest (51). The use of more specific immunosuppressive treatments, such as particular recombinant cytokines, cytokine receptors, or anticytokine monoclonal antibodies, may improve efficacy and decrease limiting side effects. However, because the immunological milieu appears to change over the course of the disease, a better understanding of disease evolution will be important. It is likely that some of these agents will be useful only in early, middle, or late stage disease or in immunologically active disease. Such an approach would also require the development of novel clinical and laboratory approaches to disease staging or the assessment of disease activity. The use of these agents in disease prevention or treatment of mild GO or PTD will come with the development of new agents with few adverse side effects.

Cellular contributions

The primary cellular function of fibroblasts appears to be synthesis of GAG and enzymes necessary for GAG remodeling and degradation. These activities are central to the elaboration, organization, and disposal of extracellular matrix. Fibroblasts were long considered to be a relatively homogeneous population of cells. However, recent studies have shown these cells to possess a wide array of tissue-specific phenotypes. These site-specific characteristics may contribute to the involvement of certain fibroblast-containing tissues in the extrathyroidal manifestations of Graves’ disease. For instance, hyaluronan synthesis in fibroblasts obtained from the orbit is relatively insensitive to T3 and dexamethasone, whereas its production in skin fibroblasts is markedly inhibited by physiological concentrations of these hormones (52). Similarly, orbital fibroblasts treated with IFN{gamma} and leukoregulin synthesize high levels of hyaluronan, whereas levels in similarly treated dermal fibroblasts are much lower. Likewise, orbital fibroblasts produce extremely high levels of PGE2 after treatment with proinflammatory cytokines, whereas the response of dermal fibroblasts is less dramatic (53). Finally, unlike cultured fibroblasts from other anatomical sites, those obtained from the orbit do not express hyaluronidase (54). This enzyme is necessary for the degradation of hyaluronan, and its absence in orbital fibroblasts may contribute to the local accumulation of hydrated GAG in the orbit in GO.

Fibroblast heterogeneity extends even to subpopulations of these cells within a single tissue. These subsets can be differentiated on the basis of protein, carbohydrate, and ganglioside cell surface markers (55). Although some markers define subsets with functional characteristics such as sensitivity to cytokine-induced PGE2 or IL-8 expression, others appear to identify precursor cells capable of differentiating into more specialized cell types, such as chondrocytes, myofibroblasts, and adipocytes (56). Such fibroblast heterogeneity within a single tissue may contribute to differences in disease expression between individuals with GO, such as whether orbital fat expansion or extraocular muscle enlargement is the more prominent feature (6, 7).

The finding of TSH-stimulated lipolysis in rat epididymal adipose cells was the first indication that TSHr might be expressed in tissues outside the thyroid (57). The concept that TSHr-expressing orbital tissue may be targeted in GO evolved from early studies showing TSH binding to guinea pig adipose and retroorbital tissues or to porcine orbital connective tissue membranes (58, 59). The expression of this receptor in human fat tissue was suggested by studies showing regulation of lipolysis by physiological levels of TSH in human fetal and newborn, but not adult, adipocytes (60). These results implicated TSH and its receptor in the regulation of thermogenesis in early postnatal life.

Adipocyte precursor cells, termed preadipocytes or preadipocyte fibroblasts, can be isolated from various adipose or connective tissue-containing regions of the body and stimulated in vitro to undergo adipogenesis (61). The expression of TSHr increases in parallel with adipogenesis in cultures of rat preadipocytes (62) and human preadipocytes obtained from patients with GO (63). In the latter cultures, approximately 5–20% of cells appear capable of responding to adipogenic stimuli. The addition of cytokines, including IFN{gamma}, TNF{alpha}, and TGFß, to either rat or human fibroblast cultures has been shown to inhibit both differentiation of the preadipocyte subpopulation and expression of TSHr in these cells (64, 65).

The mechanisms involved in the apparently selective expansion of adipose tissues within the orbit in GO are not well understood. The process of adipogenesis is tightly regulated, and key molecules initiate the differentiation of preadipocytes to mature fat cells. It may be that the balance of these factors is shifted in the GO orbit toward activation of this process. Molecules known to be important in the initiation of adipogenesis include natural ligands of the peroxisome proliferator activator receptor {gamma} (PPAR{gamma}) (66). The PPAR{gamma} agonist rosiglitazone is a potent stimulator of adipogenesis in orbital fibroblast cultures and of TSHr expression in these cells (67). It is possible that a similar endogenous ligand is activated within the orbit in the setting of Graves’ disease, leading to expanded orbital fat volume. Similarly, such a ligand would be expected to increase the local expression of TSHr and thus enhance the autoimmune reaction directed against this receptor.

Novel therapies for GO and PTD aimed at fibroblast processes might include treatment with cytokine antagonists to inhibit cytokine-stimulated biosynthesis GAG or PGE2. Another approach might be to use cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors to target PGE2-related inflammation in the orbit and skin. In addition, the novel PPAR-{gamma} antagonists currently under development might be of benefit if they were to inhibit the differentiation of preadipocytes and their expression of TSHr, thereby decreasing both orbital tissue volume and the load of this putative orbital autoantigen.

Systemic connective tissue inflammation

The orbit and pretibial skin are the extrathyroidal sites most commonly and severely affected in Graves’ disease. However, that the characteristic dermal lesions can develop at other sites, especially after trauma, suggests more widespread subclinical involvement. Other evidence in support of this hypothesis is that urinary GAG are elevated in Graves’ patients compared with controls regardless of whether severe GO or PTD is present (68). Levels of hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulfate in these patients are substantially higher than would be expected were the orbits the only abnormal source of GAG. Rather, the elevations in urinary GAG in these patients appear to reflect widespread stimulation of fibroblast metabolic processes, as might occur in the setting of systemic connective tissue inflammation.

As discussed elsewhere in this review, extrathyroidal TSHr expression does not appear to be limited to orbital and pretibial connective tissues, but is detectable in tissues throughout the body (69). If systemic connective tissue inflammation and fibroblast activation are indeed present in Graves’ disease, they might be initiated by widespread T cell recognition of TSHr on fibroblasts. In addition, a recent study demonstrated that fibroblasts from the orbit and several regions of the skin can be activated by Graves’ IgG to express T cell chemoattractant activity (70). This activity, attributable in large part to RANTES and IL-16, could stimulate the recruitment of activated lymphocytes to regions of the skin not usually manifesting thyroid dermopathy and might contribute to widespread dermal involvement. In the background of this subclinical systemic connective tissue inflammation, the positive feedback cycle discussed in this review might lead to the production of the severe ocular and dermal manifestations of Graves’ disease (Fig. 2Go).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. The positive feedback cycle producing GO and PTD. A subclinical systemic inflammatory process might develop in Graves’ disease as activated T cells and IgG recognize TSHr expressed in connective tissues. More significant involvement of the orbits and lower extremities might result from the accumulation of edema and inflammatory cytokines in these particular regions. This pooling of inflammatory mediators might be facilitated by unique anatomical and mechanical features of these regions. As fibroblasts from these sites appear to be especially sensitive to cytokine stimulation of metabolic processes, the local production of GAG and inflammatory mediators would increase. In addition, cytokines or other local factors might stimulate the differentiation of orbital precursor cells into mature adipocytes with increased expression of TSHr. This increase in target antigen expression might cause further propagation of the immunological process in the orbit and pretibial skin. Increased orbital fat and GAG production would probably cause further impairment of venous and lymphatic drainage from the orbits and lower extremities, resulting in the progression of GO and PTD.

 

Footnotes

Abbreviations: GAG, Glycosaminoglycan; GO, Graves’ ophthalmopathy; IFN{gamma}, interferon-{gamma}; PGE2, prostaglandin E2; PPAR{gamma}, peroxisome proliferator activator receptor {gamma}; PTD, pretibial dermopathy; Th1, T helper cell type 1; Th2, T helper cell type 2; TSHr, TSH receptor.

Received December 30, 2002.

Accepted January 30, 2003.

References

  1. Nagayama Y, Kaufman DD, Seto P, Rapoport B 1989 Molecular cloning, sequence, and functional expression of the cDNA for the human thyrotropin receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 165:1184–1190[Medline]
  2. Libert F, Lefort A, Gerard C, Parmentier M, Perret J, Ludgate M, Dumont JE, Vassart G 1989 Cloning sequencing and expression of the human thyrotropin (TSH) receptor: evidence for binding of autoantibodies. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 165:1250–1255[Medline]
  3. Misrahi M, Loosflet H, Atger M, Sar S, Guiochon-Mante, A, Milgrom E 1990 Cloning, sequencing and expression of human TSH receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 166:394–403[Medline]
  4. Rapoport B, Chazenbalk GD, Jaume JC, McLachlan SM 1998 The thyrotropin receptor: interaction with thyrotropin and autoantibodies. Endocr Rev 19:673–716[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Bahn RS, Heufelder AE 1993 Mechanisms of disease: pathogenesis of Graves’ ophthalmopathy. N Engl J Med 329:1468–1475[Free Full Text]
  6. Forbes G, Gorman CA, Brennan MD, Gehring DG, Ilstrup DM, Earnest F 1986 Ophthalmopathy of Graves’ disease: computerized volume measurements of the orbital fat and muscle. Am J Neuroradiol 7:651–656[Abstract]
  7. Anderson RL, Tweeten JP, Patrinely JR, Garland PE, Thiese SM 1989 Dysthyroid optic neuropathy without extraocular muscle involvement. Ophth Surg 20:568–574
  8. Bull RH, Coburn PR, Mortimer PS 1993 Pretibial myxeodema: a manifestation of lymphoedema? Lancet 341:430–404
  9. Smith TJ, Bahn RS, Gorman CA 1989 Connective tissue, glycosaminoglycans, and diseases of the thyroid. Endocr Rev 10:366–391[Medline]
  10. Rapoport B, Alsabeth R, Aftergood D, McLachlan SM 2000 Elephantiasic pretibial myxedema: insight into and a hypothesis regarding the pathogenesis of the extrathyroidal manifestations of Graves’ disease. Thyroid 10:685–692[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Matinger P 1998 An innate sense of danger. Semin Immunol 10:399–415[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Garrity JA, Fatourechi V, Bergstralh EJ, Bartley GB, Beatty CW, DeSanto LW, Gorman CA 1993 Results of transantral orbital decompression in 428 patients with severe Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 116:533–547[Medline]
  13. Weetman AP, Cohen S, Gatter KC, Fells P, Shine B 1989 Immunohistochemical analysis of the retrobulbar tissues in Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Clin Exp Immunol 75:222–227[Medline]
  14. Heufelder AE, Bahn RS 1993 Detection and localization of cytokine immunoreactivity in retroocular connective tissue in Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Eur J Clin Invest 23:10–17[Medline]
  15. de Carli M, D’Elios M, Mariotti S, Marcocci C, Pinchera A, Ricci M, Romagnani S, del Prete G 1993 Cytolytic T cells with Th-1like cytokine profile predominate in retroorbital lymphocytic infiltrates of Graves’ ophthalmopathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 77:1120–1124[Abstract]
  16. Hiromatsu Y, Yang D, Bednarczuk T, Miyake I, Nonaka K, Inoue Y 2000 Cytokine profiles in eye muscle tissue and orbital fat tissue from patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:1194–1199[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. McLachlan SM, Prummel MF, Rapoport B 1994 Cell-mediated or humoral immunity in Graves’ ophthalmopathy? Profiles of T-cell cytokines amplified by polymerase chain reaction from orbital tissue. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 78:1070–1074[Abstract]
  18. Aniszewski JP, Valyasevi RW, Bahn RS 2000 Relationship between disease duration and predominant orbital T cell subset in Graves’ ophthalmopathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:776–780[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Natt N, Bahn RS 1997 Cytokines in the evolution of Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Autoimmunity 26:129–136[Medline]
  20. Wang H-S, Cao HJ, Winn VD, Rezanka LJ, Frobert Y, Evans CH, Sciaky D, Young DA Smith TJ 1986 Leukoregulin induction of prostaglandin-endoperoxidase H synthase-2 in human orbital fibroblasts. An invitro model for connective tissue inflammation. J Biol Chem 271:22718–22728[CrossRef]
  21. Smith RS, Smith TJ, Blieden TM, Phipps RP 1997 Fibroblasts as sentinel cells. Synthesis of chemokines and regulation of inflammation. Am J Pathol 151:317[Abstract]
  22. Werner SC, Coleman DJ, Fravzen LA 1974 Ultrasonographic evidence of a consistent orbital involvement in Graves’ disease. N Engl J Med 290:1447–1450[Medline]
  23. Salvi M, Zhang Z-G, Haegert D, Woo M, Liberman A, Cadarso L, Wall JR 1990 Patients with Endocrine ophthalmopathy not associated with overt thyroid disease have multiple thyroid immunological abnormalities. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 70:89–94[Abstract]
  24. Suri A, Katz JD 1999 Dissecting the role of CD4+ T cells in autoimmune diabetes through the use of TCR transgenic mice. Immunol reviews 169:55–65[Medline]
  25. Marcocci C, Bartelena L, Bogazzi FM, Panicucci M, Pinchera A 1989 Studies on the occurence of ophthalmopathy in Graves’ disease. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 120:473–478[Medline]
  26. Fatourechi V, Pajouhi M, Fransway AF 1994 dermopathy of graves’ disease (pretibial myxedema). Review of 150 cases. Medicine 73:1–7[Medline]
  27. Tomer Y, Barbesino G, Greenberg DA, Concepcion E, Davies TF 1999 Mapping the major susceptibility loci for familial Graves’ and Hashimoto’s diseases: evidence for genetic heterogeneity and gene interactions. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:4656–4664[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Villanueva R, Inzerillo AM, Tomer Y, Barnesino G, Miltzer M, Concepcion ES, Greenberg DA, MacLaren N, Sun ZS, Zhang DM, Tucci S, Davies TF 2000 Limited genetic susceptibility to severe Graves’ ophthalmopathy: no role for CTLA-4 but evidence for an environmental etiology. Thyroid 10:791–798[Medline]
  29. Heufelder AE, Dutton CM, Sarkar G, Donovan KA, Bahn RS 1993 Detection of TSH receptor RNA in cultured fibroblasts from patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy and pretibial dermopathy. Thyroid 3:297–300[Medline]
  30. Feliciello A, Porcellini A, Ciullo, Bonavolonta G, Avvedimento EV, Fenzi G 1993 Expression of thyrotropin-receptor mRNA in healthy and Graves’ retro-orbital tissue. Lancet 342:337–338[Medline]
  31. Mengistu M, Lukes YG, Nagy EV, Burch HB, Carr FE, Lahiri S, Burman KD 1994 TSH receptor gene expression in retroocular fibroblasts. J Endocrinol Invest 17:437–441[Medline]
  32. Bahn RS, Dutton CM, Natt N, Joba W, Spitzweg C, Heufelder AE 1998 Thyrotropin receptor expression in Graves’ orbital adipose/connective tissues: potential autoantigen in Graves’ ophthalmopathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:998–1002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Crisp MS, Lane C, Halliwell M, Wynford Thomas D, Ludgate M 1997 Thyrotropin receptor transcripts in human adipose tissue. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:2003–2005[Medline]
  34. Dutton CM, Joba W, Spitzweg C, Heufelder AE, Bahn RS 1997 Thyrotropin receptor expression in adrenal, kidney, and thymus. Thyroid 7:879–884[Medline]
  35. Davies TF 1994 Editorial: the thyrotropin receptors spread themselves around. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79:1232–1233[Medline]
  36. Valyasevi RW, Erickson DZ, Harteneck DA, et al. 1999 Differentiation of human orbital preadipocyte fibroblasts induces expression of functional thyrotropin receptor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:2557–2562[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Jyonouchi S, Valyasevi R, Harteneck DA, Dutton CM, Bahn RS 2001 Interleukin-6 stimulates thyrotropin receptor expression in human orbital preadipocyte fibroblasts from patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Thyroid 11:929–934[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Watson PF, Pickerill AP, Davies R, Weetman AP 1995 Semi-quantitative analysis of interleukin-1{alpha}, interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 mRNA expression by human thyrocytes. J Mol Endocrinol 15:11–21[Abstract]
  39. Salvi M, Pedrazzoni M, Girasole G, Giuliana N, Minelli R, Wall JR, Roti E 2000 Serum concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines in Graves’ disease: effect of treatment, thyroid function, ophthalmopathy and cigarette smoking. Eur J Endocrinol 143:197–202[Medline]
  40. Valyasevi RW, Jyonouchi SC, Dutton CM, Munsakul N, Bahn RS 2001 Effect of TNF-{alpha}, IFN-{gamma}, TGF-ß on adipogenesis and expression of TSH receptor in human orbital preadipocyte fibroblasts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:903–908[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Gerding MN, van der Meer JW, Broenink M, Bakker O, Wiersinga WM, Prummel MF 2000 Association of thyrotrophin receptor antibodies with the clinical features of Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 52:267–271[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Zhang ZG, Wall JR, Bernard NF 1996 Tissue distribution and quantitation of a gene expressing a 64-kDa antigen associated with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 80:236–244[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Gunji K, Kubota S, Swanson J, Kiljanski J, Bednarczuk T, Wengrowicz S, Salvi M, Wall JR 1998 Role of the eye muscles in thyroid eye disease: identification of the principal autoantigens. Thyroid 8:553–556[Medline]
  44. Lisi S, Marino M, Pinchera A, Mazzi B, Di Cosmo C, Sellari-Franceschini S, Chiovato L 2002 Thyroglobulin in orbital tissues from patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy: predominant localization in fibroadipose tissue. Thyroid 12:351–360[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Kriss JP 1970 Radioisotopic thyroidolymphography in patients with Graves’ disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 31:315–323[Medline]
  46. Grubeck-Loebenstein B, Trieb K, Sztankay A, Holter W, Anderl H, Wick G 1994 Retrobulbar T cells from patients with Graves’ ophthalmoapthy are CD8+ and specifically recognize autologous fibroblasts. J Clin Invest 3:2738–2743
  47. Otto EA, Ochs K, Hansen C, Wall JR, Kahaly GJ 1996 Orbital tissue-derived T lymphocytes from patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy recognize autologous orbital antigens. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:3045–3050[Abstract]
  48. Many MC, Costagliola S, Detrait M, Denef JF, Vassart G, Ludgate M 1999 Development of an animal model of autoimmune thyroid eye disease. J Immunol 162:4966–4974[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Prummel MF, Wiersinga WM 1993 Smoking and risk of Graves’ disease. JAMA 269:479–482[Abstract]
  50. Metcalfe RA, Weetman AP 1994 Stimulation of extraocular muscle fibroblasts by cytokines and hypoxia; possible role in thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 40:67–72[Medline]
  51. Marcocci C, Pinchera A, Prummel MF, Wiersinga WM 2000 Immunosuppressive management of Graves’ ophthalmopathy. In: Prummel MF, ed. Recent developments in Graves’ ophthalmoapthy. Boston: Kluwer Academic; 101–113
  52. Smith, TJ 1984 Dexamethasone regulation of glycosaminoglycan synthesis in cultured human skin fibroblasts: similar effects of glucocorticoid and thyroid hormones. J Clin Invest 74:2157–2163[Medline]
  53. Han R, Tsui S, Smith TJ 2002 Up-regulation of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) synthesis by interleukin-1ß in human orbital fibroblasts involves coordinate induction of prostaglandin-endoperoxide H synthase-2 and glutathione-dependent PGE2 synthase expression. J Biol Chem 277:16355–16364[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Arbogast B, Hopwood JJ, Dorfman A 1975 Absence of hyaluronidase in cultured human skin fibroblasts. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 67:376–382[Medline]
  55. Koumas L, Phipps RP, Smith TJ 2002 Fibroblast subsets in the human orbit: Thy1+ and Thy1- subpopulations exhibit distinct phenotypes. Eur J Immunol 32:477–485[CrossRef][Medline]
  56. Smith TJ, Koumas L, Gagnow AM, Bell A, Sempowski GD, Phipps RP, Sorisky A 2002 Orbital fibroblast heterogeneity may determine the clinical presentation of thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:385–392[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Rodbell M 1964 Metabolism of isolated fat cells. I. Effects of hormones on glucose metabolism and lipolysis. J Biol Chem 239:375–380[Free Full Text]
  58. Davies TF, Teng CS, McLachlan SM, Rees-Smith B, Hall R 1978 Thyrotropin receptors in adipose tissue, retro-orbital tissue and lymphocytes. Mol Cell Endocrinol 9:303–313[CrossRef][Medline]
  59. Perros P, Kendall-Tatlor P 1994 Demonstration of thyrotropin binding sites in orbital connective tissue: possible role in the pathogenesis of thyroid-associated ophthalmoapthy. J Endocrinol Invest 17:163–170[Medline]
  60. Marcus C, Ehren H, Bolme P, Arner P 1988 Regulation of lipolysis during the neonatal period: importance of thyrotropin. J Clin Invest 82:1793–1797[Medline]
  61. Sorisky A, Pardasani D, Gagnon A, Smith TJ 1996 Evidence of adipocyte differentiation in human orbital fibroblasts in primary culture. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:3428–3431[Abstract]
  62. Haraguchi K, Shimura H, Lin L, Endo T, Onaya T 1996 Differentiation of rat adipocytes is accompanied by expression of thyrotropin receptors. Endocrinology 137:3200–3205[Abstract]
  63. Valyasevi RW, Erickson DZ, Harteneck DA, Dutton CM, Heufelder AE, Jyonouchi SC, Bahn RS 1999 Differentiation of human orbital preadipocyte fibroblasts induces expression of functional thyrotropin receptor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:2557–2562[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Haraguchi K, Shimura H, Ikeda M, Endo T, Onaya T 1998 Effects of cytokines on expression of thyrotropin receptor mRNA in rat preadipocytes. Thyroid 8:687–692[Medline]
  65. Valyasevi RW, Jyonouchi SC, Dutton CM, Munsakul N, Bahn RS 2001 Effect of tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}, interferon-{gamma}, and transforming growth factor-ß on adipogenesis and expression of thyrotropin receptor in human orbital preadipocyte fibroblasts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:903–908[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Rosen ED, Sarraf P, Troy AE, Bradwin G, Moore K, Milstone DS, Spiegelman BM, Mortensen RM 1999 PPAR-{gamma} is required for the differentiation of adipose tissue in vivo and in vitro. Mol Cell 4:611–617[Medline]
  67. Valyasevi RW, Harteneck DA, Dutton CM, Bahn RS 2002 Stimulation of adipogenesis, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma} (PPAR-{gamma}), and thyrotropin receptor by PPAR{gamma} agonist in human orbital preadipocyte fibroblasts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:2352–2358[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Kahaly G, Forster G, Hansen C 1998 Glycosaminoglycans in thyroid eye disease. Thyroid 8:429–432[Medline]
  69. Davies T, Marians R, Latif R 2002 The TSH receptor reveals itself. J Clin Invest 110:161–164[Free Full Text]
  70. Pritchard J, Horst N, Cruikshank W, Smith TJ 2002 Igs from patients with Graves’ disease induce the expression of T cell chemoattractants in their fibroblasts. J Immunol 168:942–950[Abstract/Free Full Text]