* Unit of Morphology, Laboratory of Molecular Neurobiology, Department of Cell Biology and Oncology, Istituto di Ricerche
Farmacologiche Mario Negri, 66030 S. Maria Imbaro (Chieti), Italy; and § Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,
School of Medicine, St. Louis University Health Scientific Center, St. Louis, Missouri 63104
TECHNOLOGICAL breakthroughs of the last decade
have advanced our understanding of vesicular trafficking from a largely descriptive approach to a molecular science. An impressive conservation of the molecular transport machinery across phyla has been revealed (30). Although the current consensus is that intracellular
protein transport is mediated by transport vesicles, evidence suggestive of nonvesicular transport mechanisms
continues to accumulate. As a consequence, two formerly
rejected models, namely transport by cisternal progression
(13) and traffic via membranous tubules (24, 37), are attracting renewed interest. Here, we provide updated versions of these models, review both new and old evidence relevant to their application to transport pathways, and
discuss the implications as well as the difficulties posed by
these alternative mechanisms.
Cisternal Progression-Maturation
The model of transport by cisternal progression has been
largely based on morphological observations of scale-covered green algae. The best characterized case is that of
Pleurochrysis scheffelii; however, many related organisms
also display the same secretory phenomena (for a recent
review see reference 2). The scales of P. scheffelii are
much too large to be packaged into vesicles and appear to
be transported by the progression of Golgi cisternae towards the plasmalemma, where the cisternae fuse to release the secretory product. This progression model was
discounted as a universal mechanism of intra-Golgi transport because its original formulation, in which each cisterna contains all of the enzymes necessary for scale assembly and moves to the plasma membrane as a unit,
seemed inapplicable to most other cell types (12). It was
then thought that biosynthetic Golgi enzymes do not move through the stack. Indeed, in all animal cells that have
been studied, different cisternae exhibit a distinct and stable enzymatic composition.
The transport of supramolecular structures through the
Golgi complex is not, however, restricted to algae. Over
the years, it has been observed in plants (for review see
reference 31) and also in several animal cell types. For instance, casein submicelles in lactating mammary gland
cells (4), apolipoprotein E in liver cells (9), procollagen in
fibroblasts (17), and large proteinaceous membrane thickenings in urothelial cells (32) are detected throughout the
Golgi cisternae but are consistently absent from Golgi vesicles. Many of these secretory products are simply too
large to be packaged into transport vesicles. The movement of such large particles through Golgi stacks suggests
that some sort of progression mechanism occurs in many
different cell types. If this is the case, however, the progression model must be revised to account for the observed constancy of the cisternal enzyme distribution.
One way to overcome this difficulty is to assume that the
anterograde shift of each cisterna is coupled with retrograde relocation of its enzymes into the next proximal cisterna. The cisternal progression scenario could be as follows (Fig. 1 A): The material exiting from the ER
converges towards the Golgi complex and forms a new cis-cisterna. The nonsecretory material (e.g., ER-resident proteins, soluble N-ethyl-maleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein [SNAP] receptors) is retrieved from the
cis-Golgi into the ER, while at the same time the defining
components of the medial compartment (e.g., medial
Golgi enzymes) flow backward into the cis-elements. The
cis-compartment thus acquires medial Golgi features and,
in effect, becomes a medial compartment. The process repeats itself (the medial compartment becoming trans) until
the cargo reaches the TGN. Finally, the secretory material in the TGN is progressively released through the formation of secretory granules, vesicles, or via other mechanisms, consuming the organelle. TGN resident proteins
then recycle back to the trans-Golgi, thereby transforming
it into the next TGN ready for secretion. The essential
characteristic of this mechanism is the maturation of the
cisternae, with the consequence that cargo progresses across the stack. From this point of view, cisternal maturation-progression would be a more proper definition of the
model. The model also implies that the intercisternal protein matrix (5) should be dynamic, forming at the cis-side,
where it may act to organize incoming intermediate compartment membrane into a new cis-cisterna, and then disassembling at the trans-side when the TGN is consumed. Attractive candidates for matrix components are the cytoskeletal proteins spectrin and ankyrin (11), which reversibly associate with the Golgi complex and the cis-Golgi matrix protein GM130 (25).
Is the maturation mechanism compatible with our current knowledge about the location of Golgi enzymes? It is
consistent with the observed lack of sharp separation between cis-, medial, and trans-Golgi enzymes in different
cisternae (27 and references therein), while it is seemingly
in contrast with the lack of reports of such enzymes outside the Golgi stacks. It is possible, however, that the concentrations of the enzymes transiting in such carriers might be too low to be detected by morphological approaches. Indeed, low concentrations of Golgi-resident
enzymes have been observed in isolated Golgi-derived
vesicles (33). Moreover, evidence is accumulating that resident Golgi enzymes and proteins are not stationary but
can move through the Golgi stack (14 and references therein), as required by the model.
In summary, the available evidence is consistent with
the possibility that cisternal progression-maturation occurs in at least some mammalian cells. The main features
of the model now need to be tested in a systematic and integrated fashion. A key advancement, we believe, will be
the development of suitable systems for analysis of retrograde transport of Golgi enzymes.
Tubules in Intracellular Traffic
Tubules are a prominent feature of both endocytic and
exocytic transport pathways. They have been implicated as
carriers or vesicle precursors in "dissociative" transport
from endosomes (21) to the plasma membrane, from the
TGN to plasma membrane (16), and from the intermediate compartment to the Golgi complex (20). It has also
been proposed that they form direct linkages between different compartments (23). Here, we will focus on their
possible role as membranous bridges.
Tubular continuities between
the ER and the Golgi have been described many times in
thin-sectioned specimens from a variety of tissues and cell
types. Because they are not always found, it has been suggested that they might be artifactual (1). However, when
techniques specifically designed for revealing complex
structures in tridimensional space have been used, tubular
connections have generally been observed (19 and references therein). Thus, their existence is very likely; however, their abundance, the regulation of their formation
(which might be affected by temperature; 34), and their
function remain unclear.
Tubules are also a well-characterized feature of the
Golgi complex. Both the cis- and the trans-most Golgi elements are largely tubular. The central part of the complex
consists of a continuous ribbon-like structure comprising
several stacks of cisternae interlinked by tubular-reticular
networks (28). Connectivity between adjacent stacks is
also indicated by the rapid diffusion of enzymes within the
intact Golgi of living cells (8). Golgi tubules are dynamic and form rapidly both in vivo and in vitro (6, 37; Lippincott-Schwartz, J., personal communication). Given that
the evidence for anterograde vesicular intra-Golgi traffic
remains ambiguous (18, 36, 37), while that for participation of the coat protein (COP I) machinery in retrograde
vesicular traffic is quite strong (18), it has been proposed
that anterograde transport occurs by transient tubular connections between heterotypic cisternae (37).
Such a model for transport by tubular networks connecting adjacent Golgi stacks has interesting implications,
as well as difficulties. Since intrastack cisternal connections are almost never seen, tubular transport might occur
via interstack connections in a direction tangential, rather
than perpendicular, to the stacks (35). Thus, a functional
Golgi unit would consist of a linear cis-trans series of cisternae located in different stacks and joined by tubules.
Although it is generally assumed that these tubules link
only homologous cisternae, this has not been rigorously tested because of the extreme complexity of the interstack
tubular-reticular zone, and the possibility of heterologous
connections cannot be excluded. A seeming difficulty of
such a model is that it may appear inconsistent with the
fact that transport is not disrupted when the Golgi complex is dispersed into ministacks after microtubule depolymerization (7 and references therein). Moreover, dispersed stacks are a uniform feature of the Golgi in plants
and unicellular organisms. Nevertheless, even the noninterconnected Golgi stacks of plants (dictiosomes) exhibit
abundant tubular networks at the periphery that may interconnect cisternae within the same stack (31 and references therein). Tridimensional views of isolated in vitro
mammalian Golgi stacks have also revealed cisternae, apparently within the same stack, that are interconnected by
peripheral tubular networks (38). In addition, a recent tridimensional reconstruction of nocodazole-induced ministacks also suggested that a tubular network connects apparently heterotypic cisternae within a single ministack
(Polishchuk, R., A. Fusella, A. Luini, and A. Mironov.
1996. Mol. Biol. Cell. 7[Suppl.]:598a). Thus, disruption of
the Golgi complex might give rise to other spatial arrangements of cisternae and tubules (26). The conserved nature of tubular networks in Golgi structure suggests they play
an important role in its function. Defining this function
will require identification of the molecules that control
Golgi tubule dynamics, and the development of methods
to specifically disrupt intra-Golgi tubular connections.
In many cells, early endosomes consist mostly of separate tubular networks connected with classical cisternal-vesicular endosomes (22 and references therein). Although the specific function of these networks is not understood, time-lapse video recordings show that endocytosed material enters discrete swellings of these networks and moves at rapid rates through
the endocytic tubules (15). Evidence for near-normal sorting
and transport in an apparently continuous interconnected
tubular structure is found in many brefeldin A-treated
cells, where early endosomes and the TGN fuse into an extensive tubular network with no detectable effect on transferrin recycling and iron uptake (39). These examples of
cargo movement along tubules may represent a transport
paradigm applicable to other traffic pathways.
The model requires that distinct membrane domains and vectorial traffic be maintained within connected
tubular networks. The general problem of membrane differentiation in a continuous network is exemplified by the
rough and smooth domains of the ER. Here, it is clear that
the domain localization of resident proteins involves both
retention and signal-based retrieval. Although the mechanism of retention is unknown, by analogy with plasma
membrane domains it is possible that retention involves
association of resident proteins with elements of the cytoskeleton, each other, and/or a luminal matrix. A more
dynamic retention mechanism might involve lipid-based
sorting. For example, matching of trans-membrane domain length and membrane thickness (a function of membrane lipid composition) might serve as a sorting mechanism (3). A variation on this theme would be protein
segregation by matching of protein shape (wedge, cone, or
cylinder) with membrane curvature (29). Various combinations of protein-protein and protein-lipid interactions could be sufficient to account for retention of both membrane and soluble constituents. An attraction of lipid-based sorting is that the lipid composition of membranes
varies throughout the secretory pathway as a consequence
of lipid biosynthetic activities and cholesterol uptake (3).
In vesicular transport models, the problem of vectorial
flow is solved by the dissociation of vesicles from the donor membrane and by vesicle-targeting molecules that impart directionality. In tubular traffic, directionality would
have to depend on different principles. For example, a bidirectional traffic system in which continuous membrane
addition at the proximal end of a tubular network (via the
arrival of recycling vesicular intermediates) and membrane removal from the distal end (via formation of transport vesicles) could support a directional flow through an
extended membrane system (Fig. 1 B). This would be
analogous (on a different scale) to the mechanism proposed to drive plasma membrane flow towards the cell
body of growing neurons, which depends, at least in part,
on insertion of membrane at the growth cone during secretion (10). Directional flow might also occur if the membrane is differentiated along its length such that the affinity of transported proteins for the local environment
increases from the entry to the exit sites (Fig. 1 C). A gradual increase in membrane thickness or substrate-enzyme
affinity along the direction of the flow could, for example,
provide such an affinity gradient for transiting proteins
(3). These mechanisms might be coordinated with transient fission and reformation of tubular connections (37)
to further control cargo backflow.
Concluding Remarks
The vesicular transport paradigm has reached a stage of
maturity where a satisfactory understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms is coming within our reach.
At the same time, the ever-evolving view of organelle
structure and function seems to question the usefulness of
embracing a single mechanistic model. Our view is that vesicular traffic and the models discussed in this paper are
not mutually exclusive and may, in fact, be part of a spectrum of interrelated mechanisms. For instance, the retrograde traffic of Golgi enzymes, necessary for cisternal maturation, may occur via vesicles or tubules. Intermittent
tubular continuities might mediate the fast anterograde
transport of most cargo, and supramolecular structures
could progress by a slower cisternal maturation process. While the strongest evidence for these alternative mechanisms may be limited to certain cell types or situations,
these might simply represent the regulatory extremes of
the system. It is hoped that since key aspects of these models are testable, they will be subjected to a more systematic
investigation.
Fig. 1.
(A) Cisternal maturation-progression. According to an
alternative view, the TGN consists of tubules emanating from the
trans-compartment (16). (B and C) Possible mechanisms of vectorial cargo flow along tubular continuities; see text for details.
[View Larger Version of this Image (33K GIF file)]
Received for publication 27 March 1997 and in revised form 23 June 1997.
Address all correspondence to Alexander Mironov, Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, Via Nazionale, 66030 S. Maria Imbaro (Chieti), Italy. Tel.: 39-872-507-344. Fax: 39-872-578-240. E-mail: mironov{at}cmns.mnegri.itWe acknowledge support from the Italian National Research Council (Convenzione C.N.R., Consorzio Mario Negri Sud), the Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC, Milan, Italy) to A. Luini, and National Institutes of Health grant GM54428 to P. Weidman.
1. | Aridor, M., S.I. Bannykh, T. Rowe, and W.E. Balch. 1995. Sequential coupling between COPII and COPI vesicle coats in endoplasmic reticulum to Golgi transport. J. Cell Biol. 1314: 875-893 . |
2. | Becker, B., B. Bolinger, and M. Melkonian. 1995. Anterograde transport of algal scales through the Golgi complex is not mediated by vesicles. Trends Cell Biol. 5: 305-307 . |
3. | Bretscher, M., and S. Munro. 1993. Cholesterol and the Golgi apparatus. Nature (Lond.). 261: 1280-1281 . |
4. | Clermont, Y., L. Xia, A. Rambourg, J.D. Turner, and L. Hermo. 1993. Transport of casein submicelles and formation of secretion granules in the Golgi apparatus of epithelial cells of the lactating mammary gland of rat. Anat. Rec. 235: 363-373 |
5. |
Cluett, E.B., and
W.J. Brown.
1992.
Adhesion of Golgi cisternae by proteinaceous interactions: intercisternal bridges as putative adhesive structures.
J. Cell Sci.
103:
773-784
|
6. | Cluett, E.B., S.A. Wood, M. Banta, and W.J. Brown. 1993. Tubulation of Golgi membranes in vivo and in vitro in the absence of brefeldin A. J. Cell Biol. 120: 15-24 [Abstract]. |
7. | Cole, N.B., and J. Lippincott-Schwartz. 1995. Organization of organelles and membrane traffic by microtubules. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7: 55-64 |
8. | Cole, N.B., C. Smith, N. Sciaky, N. Terasaki, M. Edidin, and J. Lippincott-Schwartz. 1996. Diffusion mobility of Golgi proteins in membrane of living cells. Science (Wash. DC). 273: 797-801 [Abstract]. |
9. | Dahan, S., J.P. Ahluwalia, L. Wong, B.I. Posner, and J.J.M. Bergeron. 1994. Concentration of intracellular hepatic apolipoprotein E in Golgi apparatus saccular distentions and endosomes. J. Cell Biol. 127: 1859-1869 [Abstract]. |
10. | Dai, J., and M.P. Sheetz. 1995. Axon membrane flows from the growth cone to the cell body. Cell. 83: 693-701 |
11. |
Devarajan, P.,
P.R. Stabach,
A.S. Mann,
T. Ardito,
M. Kashgarian, and
J.S. Morrow.
1996.
Identification of a small cytoplasmic ankyrin (AnkG119) in
the kidney and muscle that binds ![]() |
12. |
Farquhar, M.G., and
G.E. Palade.
1981.
The Golgi apparatus (complex)![]() ![]() |
13. | Franke, W.W., D.J. Morre, B. Deumling, R.D. Cheetham, J. Kartenbeck, E.-D. Jarasch, and H.W. Zengtraf. 1971. Synthesis and turnover of membrane proteins in rat liver: an examination of the membrane flow hypothesis. Z. Naturforsch. 26b: 1031-1039 . |
14. | Harris, S.L., and M.G. Waters. 1996. Localization of a yeast early Golgi mannosyltransferase, Och1p, involves retrograde transport. J. Cell Biol. 132: 985-998 [Abstract]. |
15. | Hopkins, C.R., A. Gibson, M. Shipman, and K. Miller. 1990. Movement of internalized ligand-receptor complexes along a continuous endosomal reticulum. Nature (Lond.). 346: 335-339 |
16. | Ladinsky, M.S., J.R. Kremer, P.S. Furcinitti, J.R. McIntosh, and K.E. Howell. 1994. HVEM tomography of the trans-Golgi network: structural insights and identification of a lace-like vesicle coat. J. Cell Biol. 127: 29-38 [Abstract]. |
17. | Leblond, C.P.. 1989. Synthesis and secretion of collagen by cells of connective tissue, bone, and dentin. Anat. Rec. 224: 123-138 |
18. | Lewis, M.J., and H.R.B. Pelham. 1996. SNARE-mediated retrograde traffic from the Golgi complex to the endoplasmic reticulum. Cell. 85: 205-215 |
19. | Lindsey, J.D., and M.H. Ellisman. 1985. The neuronal endomembrane system. I. Direct links between rough endoplasmic reticulum and the cis-element of the Golgi apparatus. J. Neurosci. 5: 3111-3123 [Abstract]. |
20. | Lippincott-Schwartz, J.. 1993. Membrane cycling between the ER and Golgi apparatus and its role in biosynthetic transport. Subcell. Biochem. 21: 95-119 |
21. | Mayor, S., J.F. Presley, and F.R. Maxfield. 1993. Sorting of membrane components from endosomes and subsequent recycling to the cell surface occurs by a bulk flow process. J. Cell Biol. 121: 1257-1269 [Abstract]. |
22. | Mellman, I.. 1996. Endocytosis and molecular sorting. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 12: 575-625 . |
23. | Mellman, I., and K.S. Simons. 1992. The Golgi complex: in vitro veritas? Cell. 68: 829-840 |
24. |
Morre, D.J., and
T.W. Keenan.
1994.
Golgi apparatus buds![]() |
25. | Nakamura, N., M. Lowe, T.P. Levine, C. Rabouille, and G. Warren. 1997. The vesicle docking protein p115 binds GM130, a cis-Golgi matrix protein, in a mitotically regulated manner. Cell. 89: 445-455 |
26. | Pavelka, M., and A. Ellinger. 1983. Effect of colchicine on the Golgi complex of rat pancreatic acinar cells. J. Cell Biol. 97: 737-748 [Abstract]. |
27. |
Rabouille, C.,
N. Hui,
F. Hunte,
R. Kieckbusch,
E.G. Berger,
G. Warren, and
T. Nilsson.
1995.
Mapping the distribution of Golgi enzymes involved in the construction of complex oligosaccharides.
J. Cell Sci.
108:
1617-1627
|
28. | Rambourg, A., and Y. Clermont. 1990. Three-dimensional electron microscopy: structure of the Golgi apparatus. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 51: 189-200 |
29. | Sackmann, E.. 1994. Membrane bending energy concept of vesicle- and cell-shapes and shape-transitions. FEBS Lett. 346: 3-16 |
30. | Schekman, R., and L. Orci. 1996. Coat proteins and vesicle budding. Science (Wash. DC). 271: 1526-1533 [Abstract]. |
31. | Schnepf, E.. 1993. Golgi apparatus and slime secretion in plants: the early implications and recent models of membrane traffic. Protoplasma. 171: 3-11 . |
32. | Severs, N.J., and R.M. Hicks. 1979. Analysis of membrane structure in the transitional epithelium of rat urinary bladder. 2. The discoidal vesicles and Golgi apparatus: their role in luminal membrane biogenesis. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 69: 279-296 |
33. | Sönnichsen, B., R. Watson, H. Clausen, T. Misteli, and G. Warren. 1996. Sorting by COP I-coated vesicles under interphase and mitotic conditions. J. Cell Biol. 134: 1411-1425 [Abstract]. |
34. | Stinchcombe, J.C., H. Nomoto, D.F. Cutler, and C.R. Hopkins. 1995. Anterograde and retrograde traffic between the rough endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi complex. J. Cell Biol. 131: 1387-1401 [Abstract]. |
35. | Tanaka, K., A. Mitsushima, H. Fukudome, and Y. Kashima. 1986. Three-dimensional architecture of the Golgi complex observed by high resolution scanning electron microscopy. J. Submicrosc. Cytol. 18: 1-9 |
36. | Taylor, T.C., M. Kanstein, P. Weidman, and P. Melançon. 1994. Cytosolic ARFs are required for vesicle formation but not for cell-free intra-Golgi transport: evidence for coated vesicle-independent transport. Mol. Biol. Cell. 5: 237-252 [Abstract]. |
37. | Weidman, P.. 1995. Anterograde transport through the Golgi complex: do Golgi tubules hold the key? Trends Cell Biol. 5: 302-305 . |
38. | Weidman, P., R. Roth, and J. Heuser. 1993. Golgi membrane dynamics imaged by freeze-etch electron microscopy: views of different membrane coatings involved in tubulation versus vesiculation. Cell. 75: 123-133 |
39. | Wood, S.A., and W.J. Brown. 1992. The morphology but not the function of endosomes and lysosomes is altered by brefeldin A. J. Cell Biol. 119: 273-285 [Abstract]. |