|
Report |
Correspondence to Sharad Kumar: sharad.kumar{at}imvs.sa.gov.au
Abstract
In Drosophila, activation of the apical caspase DRONC requires the apoptotic protease-activating factor homologue, DARK. However, unlike caspase activation in mammals, DRONC activation is not accompanied by the release of cytochrome c from mitochondria. Drosophila encodes two cytochrome c proteins, Cytc-p (DC4) the predominantly expressed species, and Cytc-d (DC3), which is implicated in caspase activation during spermatogenesis. Here, we report that silencing expression of either or both DC3 and DC4 had no effect on apoptosis or activation of DRONC and DRICE in Drosophila cells. We find that loss of function mutations in dc3 and dc4, do not affect caspase activation during Drosophila development and that ectopic expression of DC3 or DC4 in Drosophila cells does not induce caspase activation. In cell-free studies, recombinant DC3 or DC4 failed to activate caspases in Drosophila cell lysates, but remarkably induced caspase activation in extracts from human cells. Overall, our results argue that DARK-mediated DRONC activation occurs independently of cytochrome c.
Introduction
Apoptosis is a highly conserved process of cell suicide that is mediated by a family of proteases known as caspases. In mammalian cells, activation of caspases can occur through two pathways (for review see Degterev et al., 2003). The death receptor pathway involves ligation of TNF family of death receptors, which results in recruitment of caspase-8 to a death-inducing signaling complex, which in turn, induces activation of caspase-8. Active caspase-8 then activates caspase-3 and other caspases by proteolytic processing. The intrinsic death pathway is induced by stimuli such as stress, UV, or cytotoxic drugs and leads to permeabilization of the mitochondrial membrane, resulting in the release of various mitochondrial proteins, such as cytochrome c, into the cytosol.
In mammals, cytochrome c triggers the activation of the apoptotic protease-activating factor (Apaf-1), enabling Apaf-1 to recruit and activate caspase-9 through a mechanism that is not completely understood (Li et al., 1997; Rodriguez and Lazebnik, 1999; Zou et al., 1999). The complex of Apaf-1, cytochrome c and active caspase-9, which is referred to as the apoptosome, induces the proteolytically processing and activation of caspase-3, the protease responsible for the majority of morphological changes associated with apoptosis (Degterev et al., 2003).
Similar to mammals, the Drosophila Apaf-1 homologue DARK, is required for activation of the Drosophila caspase-9 homologue DRONC, and apoptosis (for reviews see Kumar and Doumanis, 2000; Kumar, 2004). Like Apaf-1, DARK contains a series of WD repeats, which are the domains in Apaf-1 that interact with cytochrome c (Kanuka et al., 1999; Rodriguez et al., 1999; Zhou et al., 1999). One might expect that DARK, like Apaf-1, would require cytochrome c for its activation. However, whether this is true is unclear. Addition of mammalian cytochrome c to Drosophila embryonic extracts, only increased total caspase activity twofold (Kanuka et al., 1999) or had no effect on caspase activation (Varkey et al., 1999). Also, cytochrome c is not released into cytosol of Drosophila cells during apoptosis, even though DRONC is activated (Varkey et al., 1999; Dorstyn et al., 2002). These findings led to the proposal that cytochrome c undergoes a conformational change on the surface of the mitochondrial membrane, and that this change is required and sufficient for the activation of DARK (Varkey et al., 1999). However, silencing the expression of the cytochrome c proteins had no effect on apoptosis of Drosophila SL2 cells (Zimmermann et al., 2002). Given that apoptosis can proceed in the absence of cytochrome c proteins, these results suggest that cytochrome c is not important for cell death or caspase activation in Drosophila cells.
Drosophila encodes two cytochrome c proteins, DC3 and DC4 (Limbach and Wu, 1985). DC4 has highest homology to cytochrome c from other species, and its expression is abundant but varies in different tissues with stage of development. DC3 is ubiquitously expressed during development but at much lower levels (Limbach and Wu, 1985). DC3 has been implicated in the activation of caspases during spermatid individualization in Drosophila (Arama et al., 2003). These observations raise the possibility that DC3 can function as an activator of DARK at some stages of Drosophila development. Here, we have investigated whether either DC3 or DC4 proteins are required for activation of caspases in Drosophila, and if they can induce caspase activation in a cell-free system. Our data indicate that both cytochrome c species are not required for caspase activation in Drosophila development and in Drosophila cells, even though they can induce activation of Apaf-1.
Results and discussion
DC3 and DC4 are not required for caspase activation in Drosophila cells
To compare the expression of dc3 and dc4 in Drosophila cell lines, we used RT-PCR analysis and found that dc3 is expressed at lower levels in BG2, SL2 and l(2)mbn cells, compared with dc4 (Fig. 1 A). Expression of dc3 was the lowest in BG2 cells. To test whether DC3 or DC4 are required for the activation of DRONC or DRICE, we silenced the expression of dc3 and dc4 by RNA interference (RNAi) in Drosophila BG2 cells, with doube-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) to each gene. The ablation was confirmed by RT-PCR for both dc3 and dc4 (Fig. 1 B) and by immunoblotting for DC4 (Fig. 1 C). Silencing both dc3 and dc4 in BG2 cell had no effect on the processing of DRONC and DRICE after induction of apoptosis by cycloheximide (Fig. 1 C), the rate of cell death (Fig. 1 D), or caspase activity (Fig. 1 E). We also found that silencing dc3 and dc4 did not affect ecdysone-induced apoptosis (Fig. 1 D) or caspase activity (Fig. 1 E) in Drosophila l(2)mbn cells. These observations are consistent with previous studies (Zimmermann et al., 2002), which demonstrated that silencing expression of cytochrome c proteins in SL2 cells had no effect on apoptosis induced by UV, actinomycin D, or ectopic expression of Reaper or Grim. These results clearly indicate that DC3 and DC4, are not essential for caspase activation and apoptosis in Drosophila cells.
|
|
To verify the results obtained by cell fractionation, we assessed the localization of DC3 and DC4 in these BG2 cell lines. We found that the majority of DC3 and DC4 protein colocalize with MitoTracker, in both live and apoptotic cells (Fig. 3 A), indicating that these proteins remain in the mitochondria during apoptosis. A portion of DC3 was detectable outside of mitochondria in live and apoptotic cells (Fig. 3 A) consistent with its detection in light membrane and cytosol fractions (Fig. 2 D). We used an antibody that detects processed DRICE protein and confirmed that ectopic expression of DC3 or DC4 did not cause DRICE activation. Consistent with our previous observations (Dorstyn et al., 2002) we also found that in cells treated with cycloheximide, active DRICE partially colocalized with mitochondria (Fig. 3 C). However, considering that neither of the cytochromes are required for DRICE activation, the observed association may be unrelated to caspase activation.
|
|
Pre-pupae were collected 4 h after puparium formation, a time when various larval tissues including salivary glands undergo cell death and dronc has been shown to be up-regulated (Cakouros et al., 2002, 2004). We prepared lysates from bln1 heterozygote (dc3+/) and homozygous (dc3/) mutant prepupae, l(2)k13095 heterozygotes (dc4+/) and from prepupae heterozygous for the deficiency, Df(2)H20 (Df[dc3/dc4]). As shown in Fig. 5 A, there was a high level of caspase activity in wild-type (W1118) prepupae. There was no reduction in the level of caspase activity in pupae from dc3 and dc4 mutants (Fig. 5 A) or in the processing of DRONC (Fig. 5 B). Animals heterozygous for the deficiency Df(2)H20 also did not show lower caspase activity, even though the expression of cytochrome c in these flies is clearly reduced (Fig. 5 B). In addition, TUNEL staining of homozygous mutant embryos did not show any decrease in developmental cell death (unpublished data).
|
The question remains as to how DARK mediates DRONC activation. One possibility is that other factors can substitute for cytochrome c function during apoptosis. Alternatively, removal of DIAP1 from DRONC may be sufficient to allow an interaction with DARK and activation. Given that transcription plays a major role in developmental PCD in Drosophila, changes in the concentration of DIAP1, DRONC, and DARK proteins could facilitate caspase activation in the fly (Kumar and Cakouros, 2004). Our studies, combined with published work, demonstrate that Drosophila and mammalian cytochrome c proteins are functionally similar as they can both mediate respiration and Apaf-1 activation in mammalian cell lysates. Therefore, the requirement for cytochrome c in caspase activation in mammals is likely to have evolved late in evolution.
Materials and methods
Constructs
Full-length dc3 and dc4 cDNAs were PCR amplified with a 3' HA-tag, from a Drosophila larval cDNA library, and cloned into pIE1.4 vector (Novagen). For bacterial expression, dc3 and dc4 cDNAs were cloned into pQC1.2 backbone (provided by A. Rodriguez, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, H. Mizuno, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, and A. Matapurkar, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) along with cDNA encoding haem lyase.
Cell culture
Drosophila ML-DmBG2c2 (BG2) or l(2)mbn cells were maintained at 27°C as described previously (Cakouros et al., 2002; Dorstyn et al., 2002). DC3 and DC4 expressing cell lines were generated by transfecting BG2 cells with pIE1.4-DC3HA or pIE1.4-DC4HA together with a pHS-Neo expression construct (provided by N. Silverman, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA) as described previously (Cakouros et al., 2004). Transfected cells were selected with 1 mg/ml G418 (GIBCO BRL). Cells were induced to undergo apoptosis as described previously (Cakouros et al., 2002; Dorstyn et al., 2002). Cell viability/death was assessed by Trypan blue exclusion and staining with DAPI.
Fly strains
Drosophila wild-type (W1118), dc3 "blanks" mutants ([bln1/bln1], [bln1/CyoKr>GFP]), dc4 mutants [l(2)k13905/CyoKr>GFP], and dc3/dc4 deficiency strains [Df(2L) H20/CyoKr>GFP] were obtained from Bloomington Stocks Center.
Cytochrome c expression and purification
E. coli DH5 cells were transformed with either pQC1.2-DC3, pQC1.2-DC4, or pQC1.2-hcytc expression constructs. 500-ml cultures were induced with 1 mM IPTG overnight at 37°C. Cells were lysed by sonication and cleared lysates were incubated with 300 µl prewashed Ni-NTA agarose beads (QIAGEN) for 1 h at 4°C. Beads were washed with 50 vol lysis buffer and cytochrome c proteins eluted with 5 vol elution buffer (300 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 500 mM imidazole).
Caspase assays
Fluorogenic substrate assays were performed as described previously (Dorstyn et al., 1999). Cytosolic S100 protein lysates were isolated as reported previously (Dorstyn et al., 2002). Pre-pupae were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and lysed by homogenisation. 2050 µg of lysates or S100 were used in DEVD-amc or VDVAD-amc cleavage reactions. Where indicated, S100 lysates were incubated with 10 µM of purified DC3His6, DC4His6, or human cytochrome c (hcytc), and 1 mM dATP, in caspase assay buffer (Dorstyn et al., 1999) at RT and activity was measured over time using a fluorometric plate reader (PerkinElmer) (excitation 385 nm, emission 460 nm).
Cell fractionation
Mitochondria and cytosol from untreated and cycloheximide (15 µg/ml)-treated cells were separated by differential centrifugation as described previously (Dorstyn et al., 2002).
Immunoblotting
Aliquots (50 µg protein) were immunoblotted using the following antibodies: monoclonal cytochrome c 7H8.2C12 (PharMingen) used at 0.5 µg/ml; rat HA (Roche) used at 0.1 µg/ml; rabbit DRONC 1.5 µg/ml; and rabbit DRICE (provided by B. Hay, California Institute of Technology, CA) at 1 µg/ml (Dorstyn et al., 2002; Huh et al., 2004).
Immunofluorescence
Cells were stained as described previously (Dorstyn et al., 2002). Where indicated, cells were incubated with 1 µg/ml HA antibody alone or together with DRICE antibody at 4 µg/ml overnight at 4°C followed by incubation with Alexa Fluor 488 (green), Alexa Fluor 568 (red) conjugated antirabbit or goat antirat Texas red secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes). Fluorescence images were captured using a fluorescence microscope (model BX51; Olympus) and a camera (model U-CMAD3/CV-M300; Olympus). Cells were visualized under 100 x UPLAPO objective lens with NA = 1.3, under oil immersion. All green and red fluorescent images were automatically merged. Image analysis was performed with Metasystems Isis software (Robert Bosch). Image background brightness was adjusted to vector control cells. Images were compiled using Adobe Photoshop version 6.0.
RNAi
dc3 and dc4 were cloned into pCDNA3 (Invitrogen) and a 700-bp coding region of GFP was cloned into pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega) for use as a control. dsRNA was generated as described previously (Colussi et al., 2000; Cakouros et al., 2002). 40 nM of dsRNA was added to 2 x 106 cells in 1 ml serum-free medium. In the case of coablation of dc3 + dc4, 40 nM of each dsRNA reactions were mixed and added to cells. Cells were then incubated for 1 h at 27°C after which 2 ml of complete media containing 10% FBS was added. Cells were incubated over 48 h and treated with cycloheximide (10 µg/ml) for 6 h, or with ecdysone (10 µM) for 24 h.
RT-PCR
Total RNA was used for RT-PCR. To assess ablation of dc3 and dc4, transcripts were amplified using a 5' primer designed to 55 bases upstream of the ATG, and a 3' primer designed to the terminus of each transcript. Amplification of dronc was performed using primers designed from the 5' ATG and a 3' primer designed to a region 400 bp downstream of the start ATG.
Acknowledgments
We thank N. Silverman, B. Hay, A. Rodriguez, H. Mizuno, and A. Matapurkar for reagents and advice, and Bloomington Stock Center for fly strains.
This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. Yuri Lazebnik is supported by National Institutes of Health grant CA-13106-31.
Submitted: 9 August 2004
Accepted: 13 September 2004
Arama, E., J. Agapite, and H. Steller. 2003. Caspase activity and a specific cytochrome c are required for sperm differentiation in Drosophila. Dev. Cell. 4:687697.[Medline]
Cakouros, D., T. Daish, D. Martin, E.H. Baehrecke, and S. Kumar. 2002. Ecdysone-induced expression of the caspase DRONC during hormone-dependent programmed cell death in Drosophila is regulated by Broad-Complex. J. Cell Biol. 157:985995.
Cakouros, D., T.J. Daish, and S. Kumar. 2004. Ecdysone receptor directly binds the promoter of the Drosophila caspase dronc, regulating its expression in specific tissues. J. Cell Biol. 165:631640.
Castrillon, D.H., P. Gonczy, S. Alexander, R. Rawson, C.G. Eberhart, S. Viswanathan, S. DiNardo, and S.A. Wasserman. 1993. Toward a molecular genetic anaysis of spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: characterization of male-sterile mutants generated by single P element mutagenesis. Genetics. 135:489505.
Colussi, P.A., L.M. Quinn, D.C.S. Huang, M. Coombe, S.H. Read, H. Richardson, and S. Kumar. 2000. Debcl a proapoptotic Bcl-2 homologue, is a component of the Drosophila melanogaster cell death machinery. J. Cell Biol. 148:703710.
Degterev, A., M. Boyce, and J. Yuan. 2003. A decade of caspases. Oncogene. 22:85438567.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dorstyn, L., P.A. Colussi, L.M. Quinn, H. Richardson, and S. Kumar. 1999. Dronc, an ecdysone-inducible Drosophila caspase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:43074312.
Dorstyn, L., S.H. Read, D. Cakouros, J.R. Huh, B.A. Hay, and S. Kumar. 2002. The role of cytochrome c in caspase activation in Drosophila melanogaster cells. J. Cell Biol. 156:10891098.
Huh, J.R., S.Y. Vernooy, H. Yu, N. Yan, Y. Shi, M. Guo, and B.A. Hay. 2004. Multiple apoptotic caspase cascades are required in nonapoptotic roles for Drosophila spermatid individualization. PLoS Biol. 2:E15.[Medline]
Kanuka, H., K. Sawamoto, N. Inohara, K. Matsuno, H. Okano, and M. Miura. 1999. Control of the cell death pathway by Dapaf-1, a Drosophila APAF-1/CED-4 related caspase activator. Mol. Cell. 4:757769.[Medline]
Kumar, S. 2004. Migrate, differentiate, proliferate or die: Pleiotropic functions of an apical "apoptotic caspase". Sci. STKE 2004: pe49.
Kumar, S., and D. Cakouros. 2004. Transcriptional control of the core cell-death machinery. Trends Biochem. Sci. 29:193199.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kumar, S., and J. Doumanis. 2000. The fly caspases. Cell Death Differ. 7:10391044.[CrossRef][Medline]
Li, P., D. Nijhawan, I. Budihardjo, S.M. Srinivasula, M. Ahmad, E.S. Alnemri, and X.D. Wang. 1997. Cytochrome c and dATP-dependent formation of apaf-1/caspase-9 complex initiates an apoptotic protease cascade. Cell. 91:479489.[Medline]
Limbach, K.J., and R. Wu. 1985. Characterization of two Drosophila melanogaster cytochrome c genes and their transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res. 13:631644.[Abstract]
Rodriguez, A., and Y. Lazebnik. 1999. Caspase-9 and APAF-1 form an active holoenzyme. Genes Dev. 13:31793184.
Rodriguez, A., H. Oliver, H. Zou, P. Chen, X. Wang, and J.M. Abrams. 1999. DARK is a Drosophila homologue of APAF-1/CED-4 and functions in an evolutionarily conserved death pathway. Nat. Cell Biol. 1:272279.[CrossRef][Medline]
Varkey, J., P. Chen, R. Jemmerson, and J.M. Abrams. 1999. Altered cytochrome c display precedes apoptotic cell death in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol. 144:701710.
Zhou, L., Z. Song, J. Tittel, and H. Stellar. 1999. HAC-1 a Drosophila homolog of Apaf-1 and CED-4, functions in developmental and radiation-induced apoptosis. Mol. Cell. 4:745755.[Medline]
Zimmermann, K.C., J.-E. Ricci, N.M. Droin, and D. Green. 2002. The role of ARK in stress-induced apoptosis in Drosophila cells. J. Cell Biol. 156:10771087.
Zou, H., Y. Li, X. Liu, and X. Wang. 1999. An APAF-1 cytochrome c multimeric complex is a functional apoptosome that activates procaspase-9. J. Biol. Chem. 274:1154911556.