Correspondence to: Alan F. Horwitz, Dept. of Cell Biology, UVA School of Medicine, P.O. Box 800732, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0732 (for express mail add 1300 Jefferson Park Ave.). Tel:(804) 243-6813 Fax:(804) 982-3912 E-mail:horwitz{at}virginia.edu.
![]() |
Abstract |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
To investigate the mechanisms by which adhesions form and disperse in migrating cells, we expressed 5 integrin,
-actinin, and paxillin as green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusions. All localized with their endogenous counterparts and did not perturb migration when expressed at moderate levels.
5-GFP also rescued the adhesive defects in CHO B2 cells, which are
5 integrin deficient. In ruffling cells,
5-GFP and
-actininGFP localized prominently at the leading edge in membrane protrusions. Of the three GFP fusion proteins that we examined, paxillin was the first component to appear visibly organized in protrusive regions of the cell. When a new protrusion formed, the paxillin appeared to remodel from older to newer adhesions at the leading edge.
-Actinin subsequently entered adhesions, which translocated toward the cell center, and inhibited paxillin turnover. The new adhesions formed from small foci of
-actininGFP and paxillin-GFP, which grew in size. Subsequently,
5 integrin entered the adhesions to form visible complexes, which served to stabilize the adhesions.
5-GFP also resided in endocytic vesicles that emanated from the leading edge of protrusions. Integrin vesicles at the cell rear moved toward the cell body. As cells migrated,
5 vesicles also moved from a perinuclear region to the base of the lamellipodium. The
5 vesicles colocalized with transferrin receptor and FM 4-64 dye. After adhesions broke down in the rear,
5-GFP was found in fibrous structures behind the cell, whereas
-actininGFP and paxillin-GFP moved up the lateral edge of retracting cells as organized structures and then dissipated.
Key Words: cell adhesion, endocytosis, cytoskeleton, membrane protrusions, vesicle trafficking
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Cell migration is an integrated process requiring both adhesion to and detachment from the surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM)1 (
An emerging model for adhesion formation is that adhesive complexes nucleate around a small cluster of ligand-bound integrins with structural and signaling molecules joining the complex in distinct temporal waves. This model is supported by the finding that distinct classes of focal adhesion proteins colocalize with peptides bound to polystyrene beads containing different integrin-binding reagents, that is, those that mediate ligation, clustering, or both (
Compared with the process of formation, less is known about adhesion breakdown. One model proposes that molecular interactions fracture in response to contractile forces at relatively specific sites within the ECM integrincytoskeletal linkage and thus weaken or release attachments at the rear of the cell. This is supported by observations of the fates of integrins at the cell rear. These studies suggest several possible cleavage sites, whose probability depends on adhesion strength (
The formation of adhesions at the front and their dissolution at the cell rear results in the accumulation in the rear of adhesive material derived from the cell front. Thus, it is likely that efficient mechanisms exist to move material from the rear to the front. Previous studies have demonstrated that integrins are rapidly internalized from the cell surface (
Since most of the studies examining adhesion formation and breakdown were performed in quiescent cells, it is unclear how these observations apply to migrating cells. When adhesive dynamics were studied in motile fibroblasts, antibody-labeled integrins were rapidly cleared from the cell front, making formation of new adhesions at the leading edge impossible to examine (
To address the mechanisms of adhesion formation and turnover, we generated GFP-labeled fusion proteins of three adhesion components: 5 integrin, paxillin, and
-actinin. This allowed us to visualize the dynamics of three different adhesion-related molecules either singularly or in pairs during migration. These studies produced several interesting observations including (a) the movement of integrin-containing vesicles from the leading lamella to a perinuclear region and trafficking of vesicles from this region to the base of the lamellipodia, (b) a hierarchical mechanism for the formation of adhesions in which paxillin accumulation is followed by organized
-actinin, which in turn is followed by visibly organized
5 integrin, (c) the turnover of paxillin adhesions but not
-actinin at the base of newly forming protrusions, (d) the translocation of
-actinincontaining adhesions, which is inhibited by the presence of visibly organized integrin, and (e) a severing of the integrincytoskeletal linkage and the translocation and dispersal of paxillin and
-actinincontaining cytoskeletal complexes at the cell rear. Taken together, these results point to a hierarchical model for the formation of adhesions and multiple integrin-trafficking pathways and suggest that rear release is mediated by contraction and severing of an integrin proximal connection with the cytoskeleton.
![]() |
Materials and Methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Cloning
The eukaryotic expression vectors pEGFP-N3, pECFP-N1, and pEYFP-N1 were obtained from CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc. For 5 and paxillin cDNA (provided by L. Reichardt and C.E. Turner, SUNY Upstate Medical University), we inserted a KpnI restriction site before the stop codon using a mutagenic PCR primer with a noncomplementary KpnI site at its 5' end. A minimal amount of this 3' cDNA fragment was religated to the original cDNA using either pCR2.1 (Invitrogen) or pCRScript (Stratagene) as a cloning intermediate. We used the KpnI site and one upstream within the original cDNA to ligate each cDNA into the polylinker 5' to the start codon of the respective GFP variant. The entire PCR fragment and the junction region between the protein and GFP was sequenced. We obtained a similarly prepared
-actininGFP construct in the pEGFP-N1 vector from C. Otey and M. Edlund (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC). This fusion scheme created a 10amino acid linker between
5 or paxillin (LQAGPGSIAT) and EGFP, a 13amino acid linker between
5 or paxillin and enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP) or enhanced cyan fluorescent protein (ECFP) (AAVPRARDPPVAR), and a 20amino acid linker between
-actinin and EGFP, ECFP, or EYFP (KLRILQSTVPRARDPPVAT). Paxillin and
-actinin ECFP and EYFP were prepared by cloning the cDNAs into the mammalian expression vector pCDNA3.1/Zeo (Invitrogen). The head and rod domains of
-actinin fused to GFP were provided by C. Otey and M. Edlund.
Cell Culture
CHO K1 and CHO B2 cells were cultured in DME (GIBCO BRL) supplemented with 10% FBS, 4 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and nonessential amino acids (Sigma-Aldrich). WI38 cells were maintained in high glucose DME supplemented with 10% FBS and 1 mM sodium pyruvate. Transfections were performed with lipofectamine (GIBCO BRL), and the cells were selected with 1 mg/ml G418 (Sigma-Aldrich) or 0.5 mg/ml zeocin, where appropriate. Stably transfected cells were maintained in 0.5 mg/ml G418 and/or 0.25 mg/ml zeocin and sorted for expression levels by flow cytometry.
Immunocytochemistry
Cells were plated for >4 h in HyQ-CCM1 serum-free medium (Hyclone) on coverslips coated with 20 µg/ml fibronectin (Fn), fixed, and stained as described previously (-actinin A5044 (Sigma-Aldrich). Human
5 was stained with monoclonal antibody 6F4 and endogenous and expressed
5 were detected with polyclonal anti-
5 Ab1949 (Chemicon). CHO endogenous ß1 was detected using monoclonal 7E2 (University of Iowa Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Iowa City, IA) and polyclonal 36E3 (a gift from D. DeSimone, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA). The transferrin receptor was stained with monoclonal antibody B65.3 (provided by S. Green, University of Virginia, and I. Trowbridge, Salk Institute, La Jolla, CA). Actin fibers were visualized using rhodamine-phalloidin.
Cell Surface Biotinylation and Immunoprecipitation of 5 Integrin
CHO B2 cells transfected with untagged 5 or
5-GFP were washed twice with EBSS, 25 mM Hepes, pH 7.4 (EBS-H), and biotinylated for 60 min at 4°C with 0.5 mg/ml NHS-biotin (Pierce Chemical Co.). After washing the cultures, the cells were extracted with 100 mM N-octylglucoside in 25 mM Hepes, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4 (HBS), with protease inhibitors (aprotinin, leupeptin, and E-64) for 30 min at 4°C and centrifuged for 10 min at 14,000 g.
5 integrin was then immunoprecipitated by incubation with 6F4 monoclonal antibody (5 µg) for 12 h at 4°C and protein G agarose (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) for 4 h at 4°C. The samples were washed five times with 25 mM N-octylglucoside in HBS and centrifuged for 10 min at 14,000 g. The immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE on 5% slabs, transferred to nitrocellulose, and detected by Western blot analysis.
Microscopy
Tissue culture dishes were modified to facilitate microscopic observation of living cells as described previously (
Analysis
For migration experiments, cell paths were tracked using the nanotrack tool in ISee, which records the x and y pixel coordinates of the approximate centurion of the somitic cell cortex. The average speed for each cell was determined by computing the average net centroid translation divided by the time interval at each 5- or 10-min time point. This protocol was adapted for calculating rates of movement of paxillin- or -actinincontaining adhesion complexes.
Online Supplemental Material
Time-lapse images are included as online videos, which further depict Fig 2 (Videos 1 and 2), 3 (Videos 3 and 4), 5 (Video 5), 6 (Video 6), and 10 (Videos 810). Video 7 shows -actinin adhesions moving inward toward the cell center. Additional time-lapse images for Fig 3, showing vesicles emanating from membrane protrusions (Video 2) and vesicles moving to and from the base of the lamellipodia (Video 11) are included. The time intervals for each video are as follows: Videos 1, 2, 6, and 10, 5 s; Videos 3, 5, and 8, 10 s; Video 9, 15 s; Video 4, 30 s; Videos 7 and 11, 60s. Supplemental Fig 1, Fig 2, and Fig 3 are also provided. All videos and supplemental figures are available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/153/7/1427/DC1.
|
|
|
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
GFP Fused to 5 Integrin, Paxillin, and
-Actinin Mimic Unlabeled Proteins
To study the formation and breakdown of adhesive structures, we prepared expression constructs that encode 5 integrin, paxillin, and
-actinin as GFP fusion proteins. Previous studies have examined the properties of cells expressing GFP fusions with paxillin and
-actinin; however,
5-GFP has not been characterized (
5- and
5-GFPtransfected CHO B2 cells were biotinylated, extracted, and immunoprecipitated with the
5 antibody 6F4. Two major bands were biotinylated in each sample, and the larger of these surface-expressed proteins cross-reacted with a polyclonal
5 antibody (Fig 1 a). The
5-GFP band was
30-kD larger than the band precipitated from CHO B2 cells transfected with untagged
5, indicating that GFP was not cleaved (Fig 1 a). The smaller biotinylated band was
98 kD, which is the size expected for coprecipitated ß1 integrin (Fig 1 a). Furthermore, cleaved GFP was not observed in total protein extracts from
5-GFPexpressing CHO B2 and CHO K1 cells (data not shown). Similarly, cleaved GFP was not detected in cells expressing moderate (<2x over expression) levels of
-actinin and paxillin; these cells were subsequently used in our experiments.
We compared cell surface levels of 5 integrin in our transfected CHO B2 and CHO K1 cells by FACS® analysis. As shown in Fig 1 b, using saturating concentrations of the antibodies, the
5 integrin expression level in the transfected CHO B2 cells was comparable to the level of endogenous
5 integrin in the CHO K1 cells. Thus, these results indicate that
5 integrin is not significantly overexpressed in the CHO B2 cells when compared with the expression of endogenous
5 integrin in CHO K1 cells.
To determine whether the 5-GFP fusion retained integrin function, we performed migration assays and tested its ability to rescue cell spreading of CHO B2 cells, a cell line isolated for its low expression levels of
5 integrin. These cells do not spread on Fn-coated substrates unless
5 is expressed ectopically (
5 function (
5 and GFP-tagged paxillin and
-actinin migrate indistinguishably from the cells expressing similar levels of the untagged proteins (Table 1). Expression of
5-GFP restored the ability of CHO B2 cells to spread similarly to cells expressing untagged
5 integrin (Table 2). To confirm that the ectopic expression of
5 integrin rescues CHO B2 spreading on Fn, we used antibodies that perturb the integrinFn interaction. This rescue was inhibited by 16G3 Mab (a gift from K. Yamada, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD), which recognizes the RGD sequence in Fn and disrupts the
5Fn interaction (Table 2). The
5 integrin function-blocking antibodies, VD1 and VD10 (provided by R. Isberg, Tufts University, Boston, MA), inhibited spreading of
5-GFPexpressing CHO B2 cells on Fn by 99 ± 2% and 97 ± 3%, respectively. The nonfunction perturbing
5 antibody, 6F4, had no effect on cell spreading (Table 2). Thus, the spreading of
5-GFPtransfected CHO B2 cells is mediated by a direct interaction between
5 and Fn.
|
|
Each fusion protein reproduced the localization patterns of its untagged counterpart when expressed in CHO B2, CHO K1, and NIH-3T3 cells under conditions that promote formation of prominent focal adhesions, such as plating on Fn concentrations >5 µg/ml or longer than 6 h. When CHO K1 cells expressing 5-GFP,
-actininGFP, or paxillin-GFP were allowed to adhere under focal adhesionpromoting conditions, all three fusion proteins colocalized with vinculin in focal adhesions with
-actinin also localizing along fibrous structures (Fig 1, ce). This confirms previous studies using paxillin- and
-actininGFP (
We then compared the kinetics of adhesive assembly of untagged 5- and
5-GFPexpressing cells by allowing cells to adhere for 0.5, 1.5, and 18 h in CCM1 on substrates coated with 5 µg/ml Fn. Cells were stained for endogenous and exogenous
5 and endogenous ß1, F-actin, vinculin, paxillin, and
-actinin. Untransfected CHO B2 cells did not adhere to the coverslips even after 18 h of plating, demonstrating that
5 expression is necessary for these cells to adhere to Fn. In CHO B2 cells transfected with either
5-GFP or untagged
5, the integrins, actin, and focal adhesion proteins were visible at the periphery of cells within 30 min of plating (data not shown; Fig. S1, ac and gi, available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/153/7/1427/DC1). When cells were plated for 1.5 h, an increase in organized adhesions was observed (Fig. S1, df, available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/153/7/1427/DC1). However, at both time points the intensity of staining suggested that the integrins were not as highly organized as vinculin. Importantly, the time course of organization was similar regardless of ectopic expression of the different adhesion molecules in all of the cell types studied. Both untagged
5- and
5-GFPexpressing CHO B2 cells organized more slowly than the parental CHO K1 cells, probably reflecting a clonal difference. Integrin
5-GFPexpressing CHO B2 and CHO K1 cells viewed live after plating on Fn concentrations >5 µg/ml or for longer than 6 h exhibited clear focal adhesionlike structures. At lower Fn concentrations or at shorter time points, clearly discernible
5 organization was rarely seen.
Since integrin organization in CHO cells was observed only at longer time points after plating and on higher concentrations of Fn, we complemented our CHO cell studies by examining the adhesive organization in WI38 cells. Organized adhesions as indicated by vinculin and 5 integrin staining were apparent 60 min after plating on 2 µg/ml Fn (Fig. S2, a and b, available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/153/7/1427/DC1). As with the CHO cells, the intensity of vinculin staining was much greater than that observed for
5 integrin. The GFP fusion had no effect on
5 integrin localization in the WI38 cells since the localization pattern of
5-GFP and endogenous
5 integrin was similar (Fig. S2, ac, available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/153/7/1427/DC1).
5-GFP and
-ActininGFP Localize Prominently at the Leading Edge
To obtain insight into the mechanisms by which adhesions form and stabilize at the cell front, we investigated the dynamics of the GFP probes in protrusive regions under migration-promoting conditions: Fn concentrations <5 µg/ml plated for <2 h. CHO K1 and CHO B2 cells were plated in CCM1 on 15 µg/ml Fn for 12 h and then observed in fluorescence every 5 or 30 s for 210 min. Under these conditions, both cell types are motile and show prominent protrusive activity. -ActininGFP and
5-GFP localized prominently along the cell border in membrane protrusions (Fig 2, a and b; Videos 1 and 2 available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/153/7/1427/DC1). This localization was observed in
70% of the cells viewed and in >90% of the cells that showed protrusive activity. In both CHO and WI38 cells,
-actininCFP and
5-YFP colocalized to membrane protrusions along the cell edge (Fig 2, cf).
-ActininGFP also localized along fibrous-like structures (Fig 2 a).
5 Integrin Resides in Vesicles
Previous reports using fixed cells suggest that integrin-containing vesicles are present at the cell rear and gather in a perinuclear region in migrating cells (5-GFP vesicle-like structures that emanated from the leading edge in protrusions (Fig 3 a; Video 3 available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/153/7/1427/DC1). These structures colocalized with the fluorescent lipophilic dye, FM 4-64, indicating that they were membrane-enclosed endocytic vesicles. The
5-containing vesicles moved centripetally toward the cell center and concentrated in a perinuclear region that colocalized with FM 4-64 and the transferrin receptor. The preponderance of GFP-labeled vesicles in CHO cells originated from lamellipodial regions and moved centripetally; this was also observed in WI38 cells in regions where membrane ruffling was apparent. However, in migrating WI38 cells in which minimal membrane ruffling was observed
5-containing vesicles moved from the perinuclear region to the base of the lamellipodium but not into it (Fig 3 b; Video 4 available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/153/7/1427/DC1).
5 vesicles were also observed in the rear of the cells. These vesicles moved quickly, often along the lateral edge, toward the perinuclear region where we could no longer track them due to the volume of the cell in that region and the large number of vesicular structures that accumulate there. We did not observe the
5-containing vesicles entering the lamellipodium. Interestingly, we observed substantially more vesicles in cells either expressing higher
5 integrin levels or plated on lower substrate concentrations; this coincides with increased membrane protrusive activity. Membrane-bound palmitoylated GFP also emanated from protrusions and moved inward toward the cell body, suggesting membrane internalization.
The observation that integrin-containing vesicles can emanate from the leading lamella prompted us to ask whether the inclusion of 5-GFP in vesicles was caused by fusion of
5 with GFP. Untagged
5-expressing CHO B2 cells were stained for
5 or endogenous ß1 and costained for endogenous transferrin receptor. Using deconvolution (not shown) and confocal microscopy,
5 (Fig 4) and ß1 (not shown) were observed to colocalize with the transferrin receptor. After a pulse of FM 4-64, a similar number of FM 4-64containing vesicles was observed in cells expressing either untagged
5 or
5-GFP. Thus, the vesicular and endosomal localization of
5-GFP is a property of endogenous integrins.
|
Dynamics of Adhesive Components during Formation and Stabilization of Adhesions
The leading edge of a protrusion is a site where adhesions form and stabilize. Using either GFP- or CFP- and YFP-tagged 5,
-actinin, and paxillin-transfected CHO B2 or CHO K1 cells, we observed the differing dynamics of these molecules. Of the three fusion proteins examined, paxillin appeared first. Paxillin was observed initially in a wave of diffuse fluorescence and then localized in small clusters (
1 µm) near the leading edge of the lamellipodium (Fig 5 a). These small clusters rapidly reached maximum intensity in
300 s. Once formed, individual foci did not join together to make larger adhesive complexes.
|
Paxillin-containing adhesions at the base of new protrusions were highly dynamic and tended to turn over. We viewed numerous rounds of adhesion, protrusion, and reformation in paxillin-GFPtransfected cells. In nearly every observation, the intensity of the paxillin clusters at the base of the new protrusion diminished and often disappeared as adhesions formed in a newly protruded region of the lamellipodium (Fig 5 a; Video 5 available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/153/7/1427/DC1). The rates at which the intensity decreased paralleled an increase of intensity in new adhesions (Fig 5 b). Interestingly, these paxillin clusters were visible by total internal reflection microscopy, demonstrating their proximity to the substrate (Fig 5 d).
Organized -actinin was either not apparent or very weak in the highly dynamic paxillin adhesions. This may be due to differential turnover of
-actinin and paxillin in the adhesions or the lack of visibly organized
-actinin in the newly forming paxillin adhesions. To distinguish between these, CHO K1 cells were transfected with
-actininCFP and paxillin-YFP. Clearly organized
-actinin was not detected or was very weak in the paxillin adhesions that turned over (Fig 6, ac; Fig. S3 available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/153/7/1427/DC1). Furthermore, the paxillin adhesions that formed at the lamellipodial tip as old adhesions broke down also lacked organized
-actinin (Fig 6, ac).
|
However, when protrusive activity ceased, -actininGFP began to localize in small
0.5-µm foci at the edge of the former lamellipodium. These structures developed and persisted as the protrusive activity, as seen in edge-enriched localization, dissipated (Fig 6 d; Video 6 available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/153/7/1427/DC1). The individual foci did not join together to make larger adhesive complexes but often grew gradually in size and intensity and extended filamentous structures toward the cell body. When visibly organized
-actinin entered the adhesions, the individual clusters tended to move centripetally from their original location, and further intensification was observed. Unlike the highly dynamic paxillin adhesions,
-actinincontaining adhesions did not turn over but instead tended to move inward toward the cell body. These results suggest paxillin dynamics differed from that of
-actinin and that some adhesive components at the lamellipodial base are turned over as adhesions form at the leading edge.
In CHO cells, we were unable to detect visibly organized 5 integrin colocalizing with
-actinin in newly forming adhesions (Fig 7 a). It is unlikely that another integrin is involved, since clearly organized
v and ß1 integrins were also not observed in the new adhesions. In addition,
vß3 was not detected in the CHO cells, which is consistent with previous reports that these cells express little ß3 or other integrins (
5 integrin, although present in new adhesions, is not highly concentrated and thus is not readily observed. Comparing the intensity of integrin staining with that of other adhesion molecules supports this hypothesis, since even in cells with highly organized adhesions the integrin staining is considerably less intense than that of paxillin or
-actinin.
|
Since endogenous 5 was more visibly organized in the WI38 cells than in the CHO cells, we examined the dynamics of the fusion proteins as these cell migrated. Paxillin-GFP was observed near the leading edge and turned over in regions where new protrusions formed, which is similar to our observations in the CHO cells. As membrane ruffling dissipated, organized
-actinin and subsequently
5 integrin were observed in the adhesions. Unlike the highly dynamic paxillin-containing adhesions, the
5-containing adhesions were stable and did not turn over. In WI38 cells expressing
5-YFP and
-actininCFP, some
-actinin adhesions slide inward from the cell perimeter (Fig 7, be; Video 7 available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/153/7/1427/DC1); however, those that also contained
5 integrin remained stationary (Fig 7, fi). Thus, in these cells highly organized
5 was not visible in all adhesions, and when it was the adhesions did not translocate.
Since clearly organized integrin was not observed in the forming adhesions, we examined the role of 5 ligation in the formation of paxillin clusters. When paxillin-GFPexpressing CHO K1 cells were plated on poly-L-lysine, paxillin-GFPcontaining adhesions were not detected; however, paxillin clusters were observed when the cells were plated on 2 µg/ml Fn (Fig 8, a and b). Paxillin clusters were no longer apparent after addition of the function-blocking antibody, VD1, which disrupts integrin binding to Fn (Fig 8e and Fig f). The nonfunction-blocking antibody, 6F4, had no effect on paxillin adhesions (Fig 8c and Fig d). These results suggest that the integrinFn interaction is necessary for paxillin clustering.
|
5-GFP But Not Paxillin-GFP or
-ActininGFP Remains on the Substrate at the Cell Rear
As adhesions break down, a fraction of the integrins can be left behind the cell in tracks (5-GFP integrin-expressing CHO B2 and CHO K1 cells were plated on 2.55 µg/ml Fn, we observed fluorescent fibers extending behind retracting cell regions (Fig 9 a). A network of "retraction" fibers greater than a cell length was also observed when
5-GFPexpressing WI38 cells were plated on 0.52 µg/ml Fn. In some cases, the fibers were left behind as the cells migrated. The length of these fibers was variable. These fibrous structures were membranous, since similar structures were seen behind cells transfected with a palmitoylated membrane-bound GFP (
-actininCFP do not localize with
5-YFP in these fibrous networks (Fig 9, be). This suggests that the adhesion is breaking down closer to the integrin than to the actin.
|
Intracellular Adhesive Structures Move along the Edges of Retracting Tails
Previous studies have also reported the movement of aggregates of integrins along the cell edge (-actininGFP moving along the lateral edge of the cell (Fig 10, a and b; Videos 8 and 9 available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/153/7/1427/DC1). These clusters averaged 12 µm in length and moved at
30 µm/h from the cell rear toward the cell front, although there was variation in speed between individual clusters. The clusters remained intact for over 30 min, indicating their stability (Fig 10 c; Video 10 available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/153/7/1427/DC1). Small clusters would often appear to coalesce and move up the tail as it retracted behind them. The clusters would gradually decrease in intensity and eventually disperse. Paxillin-YFP and
-actininCFP colocalized in sliding adhesive structures on the ends of
-actinincontaining fibers. The connection between stress fibers and paxillin and
-actinin complexes suggests that they remained connected to actin, which likely mediated their movement. Since visibly organized
5 adhesions were seldom seen at these early times in CHO cells, we also examined the breakdown of adhesive structures in WI38 cells. When WI38 cells were transfected with
-actininCFP and
5-YFP,
-actinincontaining adhesive structures slide inward toward the cell center as the rear of the cell retracted; however, the
5 integrin remained associated with the substrate.
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Rapid cell migration requires the efficient regulated formation and breakdown of adhesions and cycling of components from the rear to the front. Several models have been proposed for adhesion formation, but less is known about the breakdown of adhesions. One set of studies suggest a hierarchical model for adhesive assembly (
In this study, we evaluated the relative contributions of these mechanisms to adhesion dynamics by directly visualizing 5 integrin-, paxillin-, and
-actininGFP as adhesions formed and dispersed in migrating cells. Our data support hierarchical models for the formation of initial adhesive complexes. We provide evidence that classes of adhesive components enter adhesions serially. Our observations further suggest that signaling components such as paxillin enter adhesions early and turn over readily with prominent accumulations of structural molecules such as
-actinin subsequently joining the adhesion. We also support nucleation rather than the clustering of smaller minicomplexes, as reported previously for the formation of E-cadherin junctions (
5-GFP was found in fibrous structures behind the cell, whereas
-actininGFP and paxillin-GFP moved up the lateral edge of retracting cells as organized structures and then dispersed.
The leading edge of membrane protrusions is a site where new adhesions form. Of the three fusion proteins that we examined, paxillin was the first component to appear visibly organized in protrusive regions of the cell near the leading edge. It appeared in a wave of fluorescent intensity and then concentrated in visible focal complexlike structures. Interestingly, 5 integrin and prominent
-actinin though present at the leading edge are not detectable in these paxillin-rich complexes. Thus, paxillin recruitment to these contact sites is an early event in the formation of adhesions. Since paxillin serves an adaptor function in recruiting several signaling components to the membrane, it follows that these newly forming adhesions likely serve signaling roles. Consistent with this hypothesis, other studies have suggested that tyrosine phosphorylation of paxillin occurs early in focal adhesion assembly (
The absence of clearly visible 5 integrin in these complexes suggests that either the
5 integrin is not involved in the formation of new adhesions or newly forming adhesions are initiated and/or nucleated by
5 concentrations that are too low to be detected as discrete visible complexes in the light microscope. Although it is possible that other molecules, including other integrins, layilin, or syndecan play this role, it is also clear that these cells require
5 to adhere and migrate (
5 integrin, do not adhere and migrate unless they ectopically express
5 integrin. In addition, adhesion-perturbing antibodies directed against the
5 integrin or Fn inhibited the organization of paxillin, which was also not seen in cells plated on poly-L-lysine. Despite reports that there are few other integrins in these cells, we stained for
v, ß1, and ß3 subunits and were unable to detect organized adhesions. We repeated all of these studies in WI38 cells, which tend to have more highly organized adhesions. The result was similar in that the forming adhesions show clearly organized paxillin but not
5 integrin. It is also evident that
5 binding to Fn is necessary for the formation of these adhesions since they were not observed when the integrinFn interaction was disrupted with a function-blocking antibody. Finally, as visualized with antibody staining or GFP probes in cells with well-developed focal adhesions the amount of
5 in the adhesions is considerably less than that seen for cytoskeletal markers such as paxillin or vinculin. Furthermore, not all adhesions that stain with cytoskeletal markers colocalize with visibly organized integrin. From this, we conclude that the newly forming adhesions are initiated by
5 engagement, since it is required for organization of paxillin. These putative
5 integrin-containing nucleation sites are not organized as large visible complexes, though present in a concentration sufficient to stimulate robust paxillin recruitment. As with other amplification cascades that typify many other signaling pathways, ligand activation of only a small number of integrins may be sufficient to stimulate the assembly of a large macromolecular adhesive complex.
Once protrusions stabilized, -actinin began to colocalize with paxillin in small foci at the edge of the former lamellipodium. These small
-actinincontaining foci grew in size and extended small fiber-like structures toward the cell body, which is consistent with a recent study (
-actinin adhesions slid inward from the cell perimeter and stabilized the paxillin, which no longer turned over. Thus, both paxillin and
-actinin appeared to enter newly forming adhesions before visible
5 integrin. However, once visibly organized
5 integrin entered the adhesions they remained relatively stationary and did not move toward the cell center; these adhesions also contained paxillin and
-actinin. Taken together, this suggests that not all adhesions contain clearly visible
5 integrin, but when the integrin was present the adhesions remained stationary. Previous studies have also reported a sliding of adhesions in cells (
5 integrin complexes were stationary.
The 5-GFP and
-actininGFP localized prominently at the leading edge in membrane ruffles and protrusions. Since membrane-bound but not soluble GFP was also seen in ruffles, this reflects their membrane localization. However,
-actinin is an intracellular molecule that has no membrane-targeting signal and thus must rely on intermolecular interactions to localize it to the membrane. Since neither soluble GFP nor paxillin was observed at the leading edge, the interactions mediating
-actinin targeting are specific. A possible mechanism for
-actinin targeting to membrane protrusions is through its interaction with integrins, since
-actinin binds directly to the cytoplasmic domain of the ß1 subunit in vitro (
-actinin colocalized with
5 integrin in the membrane ruffles. When the head and rod domains of
-actinin fused to GFP were expressed in the CHO K1 cells, the rod domain, which contains the ß1 integrinbinding site (
-actinin to membrane protrusions, but cytotoxicity precludes a firm conclusion. Alternatively, other
-actininbinding partners such as phosphatidylinositol bisphosphate and phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate may play a role in its recruitment to membrane protrusions (
The movement of the cell over stable adhesions suggests that adhesive components will tend to concentrate away from the leading edge toward the cell rear. One hypothesis proposes that integrins are recycled from the rear of the cell to the leading edge, thus providing a supply of integrins to newly forming adhesions (
In CHO cells with robust protrusive activity, we observed 5 integrin in vesicle-like structures that emanated from membrane protrusions and congregated in a perinuclear region where it colocalized with endogenous transferrin receptor. Although the fate of these internalized integrins is not known, this observation suggests that at least a fraction of these molecules are delivered to a large recycling compartment. Alternatively, some of the internalized integrin vesicles may be degraded in lysosomal compartments. A small fraction of the vesicles moved from the perinuclear area toward the cell front, but they disappeared at or before reaching the lamellipodial base; none were observed in the lamellipodium or at the leading edge. Cells migrating under conditions in which they exhibited minimal membrane ruffling presented a complementary picture. In these cells,
5 vesicles moved from the perinuclear region to the base of the lamellipodia, whereas vesicles moving from the front were seen only infrequently. In all cells, we observed vesicles moving from the cell rear to the perinuclear area in agreement with previous observations in fibroblasts and neutrophils (
Thus, two endocytic pathways may be used by integrins. One may function to remove unligated integrin from the membrane in highly protrusive regions of the cell. In support of this, fewer vesicles were observed emanating from membrane protrusions as the substrate concentration increased. A second pathway removes integrins at the cell rear and delivers them either to the lysosomal compartment or to the cell front for formation of new adhesions. The movement of integrin-containing vesicles from the perinuclear area to the base of protrusions is consistent with previous studies (-actinin on any of the
5-containing vesicles, suggesting that the integrins are not trafficked in
-actinincontaining complexes.
Cleavage of the linkage between integrin and other cytoskeletal components may initiate the release of adhesions. The integrins are seen in fibers behind migrating cells without visible -actinin or paxillin, whereas adhesive complexes containing
-actinin and paxillin without highly organized integrin translocate from the rear by sliding along the cell edge. Unlike adhesion formation,
-actinin and paxillin were not observed to depart the adhesive clusters serially, but instead the complexes were seen to disperse. This suggests that adhesion breakdown is not simply a reversal of the mechanisms of formation.
We propose the following working model based on our observations of adhesion formation and turnover in migrating cells. Integrin, membrane-bound -actinin (possibly complexed to the integrin), and cytoplasmic paxillin are all present in new protrusions. The binding of integrins to the ECM initiates, perhaps in conjunction with other receptors, the recruitment of signaling molecules such as paxillin to newly forming contact sites. Although substrate-bound integrins may also serve as the nucleation sites for these new adhesions, it is also possible that other molecules serve this role. The unligated integrins are rapidly endocytosed and traffic to a perinuclear region. These paxillin-rich sites are highly dynamic and tend to turn over at the base of the protrusion and cycle to the leading edge as new adhesions form. Structural molecules like
-actinin are subsequently recruited to this site, although small quantities may reside with the initial putative integrin foci. These developing adhesion complexes grow in size and molecular complexity as
-actinin first enters them and then forms stress fiberlike extensions that grow toward the cell body. The presence of
-actinin serves to stabilize the paxillin, which does not turn over in adhesions containing prominent
-actinin; its presence also coincides with the centripetal movement of adhesions. Subsequently, visible concentrations of integrin enter the adhesive complex and function to stabilize the centripetal movement. At the cell rear, cleavage of the integrincytoskeletal linkage at a site proximal to the integrin is a prominent mechanism to initiate breakdown of adhesions. The remaining paxillin- and
-actinincontaining complexes move toward the cell body and then disperse rapidly. Although some integrin is left behind on the substrate, some integrin also appears in vesicles that move toward the cell body where they are either degraded or cycled to the cell front for incorporation into new adhesions.
![]() |
Footnotes |
---|
The online version of this paper contains supplemental material.
C.M. Laukaitis and D.J. Webb contributed equally to this work.
1 Abbreviations used in this paper: CFP, cyan fluorescent protein; ECFP, enhanced CFP; ECM, extracellular matrix; EGFP, enhanced GFP; EYFP, enhanced YFP; Fn, fibronectin; GFP, green fluorescent protein; YFP, yellow fluorescent protein.
![]() |
Acknowledgements |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
We thank James Casanova for advice and helpful suggestions, and Tom Parsons, Doug DeSimone, Lukas Tamm, Ken Yamada, Ralph Isberg, Magnus Edlund, Carol Otey, and Chris Turner for reagents and suggestions.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant GM23244 and the University of Virginia Cancer Center. D.J. Webb was supported by National Institutes of Health postdoctoral training grant HD07528-01.
Submitted: 15 August 2000
Revised: 21 May 2001
Accepted: 22 May 2001
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|