Evidence that Distinct States of the Integrin alpha 6beta 1 Interact with Laminin and an ADAM

M.S. Chen,* E.A.C. Almeida,* A.-P.J. Huovila,* Y. Takahashi,* L.M. Shaw,Dagger A.M. Mercurio,Dagger and J.M. White*

* Department of Cell Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908; and Dagger  Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115

    Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Integrins can exist in different functional states with low or high binding capacity for particular ligands. We previously provided evidence that the integrin alpha 6beta 1, on mouse eggs and on alpha 6-transfected cells, interacted with the disintegrin domain of the sperm surface protein ADAM 2 (fertilin beta ). In the present study we tested the hypothesis that different states of alpha 6beta 1 interact with fertilin and laminin, an extracellular matrix ligand for alpha 6beta 1. Using alpha 6-transfected cells we found that treatments (e.g., with phorbol myristate acetate or MnCl2) that increased adhesion to laminin inhibited sperm binding. Conversely, treatments that inhibited laminin adhesion increased sperm binding. Next, we compared the ability of fluorescent beads coated with either fertilin beta  or with the laminin E8 fragment to bind to eggs. In Ca2+-containing media, fertilin beta  beads bound to eggs via an interaction mediated by the disintegrin loop of fertilin beta  and by the alpha 6 integrin subunit. In Ca2+-containing media, laminin E8 beads did not bind to eggs. Treatment of eggs with phorbol myristate acetate or with the actin disrupting agent, latrunculin A, inhibited fertilin bead binding, but did not induce laminin E8 bead binding. Treatment of eggs with Mn2+ dramatically increased laminin E8 bead binding, and inhibited fertilin bead binding. Our results provide the first evidence that different states of an integrin (alpha 6beta 1) can interact with an extracellular matrix ligand (laminin) or a membrane-anchored cell surface ligand (ADAM 2).

Key words: integrin;  ADAM;  cell adhesion;  "avidity/affinity modulation";  fertilin beta
    Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

INTEGRINS are transmembrane heterodimers that act as receptors for extracellular matrix components and membrane-anchored cell surface coreceptors (Hynes and Lander, 1992; Clark and Brugge, 1995). Integrins can be activated to bind extracellular ligands by intracellular signals. Such inside-out signaling is thought to involve changes in the conformation and/or aggregation state of the integrin (Faull and Ginsberg, 1995; Brown and Hogg, 1996; Bazzoni and Hemler, 1998; Hato et al., 1998). Inside-out signaling can be invoked experimentally by activating the protein kinase C pathway with phorbol esters (Strulovici et al., 1991) or by coexpressing certain integrin-associated proteins or oncogenes (Fenczik et al., 1997; Hughes et al., 1997; Hemler, 1998; Porter and Hogg, 1998). Integrins can also be activated by several extracellular mechanisms including: varying divalent cations, applying certain ligands or antibodies, and controlling whether or not the alpha  subunit is proteolytically processed (Delwel et al., 1996). Whether activated by intracellular or extracellular means, what has been observed to date is activation of an integrin from a low to a high binding state for a particular ligand(s), or differential binding of specific integrin antibodies to the low and high binding states (Diamond and Springer, 1994; van Kooyk et al., 1994; Faull and Ginsberg, 1995).

Fertilin alpha  and beta  are sperm surface glycoproteins that have been implicated in binding and fusion to the egg plasma membrane (Blobel et al., 1992; Bigler et al., 1997; Cho et al., 1998). Fertilin alpha  and beta  (ADAM 1 and 2) are also the prototypes of the ADAM1 family of cell surface proteins (Wolfsberg and White, 1996; Black and White, 1998). ADAMs have been referred to also as MDCs, cellular disintegrins, metalloprotease-disintegrins, and disintegrin-metalloproteases. A table of the ADAMs is available at http://www.med.virginia.edu/~jag6n/whitelab.html. Like their closest relatives, the snake venom metalloproteases (SVMPs), ADAMs contain disintegrin and metalloprotease domains. Several snake venom disintegrins have been shown to interact with integrins including alpha IIbbeta 3 and alpha 2beta 1 (DeLuca et al., 1995; Jia et al., 1996; Kamiguti et al., 1996). Fertilin alpha  and beta  are proteolytically processed during sperm maturation such that on mature fertilization competent sperm (the prodomain and metalloprotease domain are removed) each subunit begins with its disintegrin domain (Lum and Blobel, 1997; Waters and White, 1997; Bigler et al., 1997). The disintegrin domain of fertilin beta  has been implicated as a key, albeit not exclusive, participant in sperm-egg binding based on the inhibitory action of peptide analogues of the disintegrin loop (Myles et al., 1994; Almeida et al., 1995; Evans et al., 1995; Gichuhi et al., 1997), antibodies against the disintegrin loop (Yuan et al., 1997), and recombinant proteins containing the disintegrin domain (Evans et al., 1997; Bigler, D., M.S. Chen, Y. Takahashi, E.A.C. Almeida, and J.M. White, manuscript in preparation). Further studies have demonstrated that the integrin alpha 6, presumably as the alpha 6beta 1 complex (Almeida et al., 1995), is involved in fertilin-mediated sperm binding. Antibodies to the alpha 6 subunit bind to zona-free mouse eggs and inhibit sperm binding. In addition, cells that express the alpha 6 and beta 1 integrin subunits bind more sperm than their nonexpressing counterparts (Almeida et al., 1995; Chen, M.S., and J.M. White, unpublished data). alpha 6beta 1 is a well characterized laminin receptor (Mercurio and Shaw, 1991; Ekblom, 1996). Therefore, it may participate in both cell-cell interactions, via the disintegrin domain of an ADAM, as well as cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions, by engaging laminin.

Like many integrins, alpha 6beta 1 on cultured cells appears to rest in a basal state for adhering to laminin. The ability of alpha 6beta 1 to bind laminin can be stimulated two- to fivefold by treating cells with phorbol esters or by adding Mn2+ to the extracellular medium. Activation occurs without a change in the amount of alpha 6 at the cell surface, suggesting that modulation is caused by changes in either the conformation (affinity) and/or aggregation (avidity) state of the integrin complex (Shaw et al., 1993; Shaw and Mercurio, 1993). These observations suggest, as with alpha IIbbeta 3 and other integrins, that adhesion of alpha 6beta 1 to laminin is responsive to physiological stimulation. The major goal of this study was to determine how agents that modulate the ability of alpha 6beta 1 to interact with laminin affect binding of sperm and, more specifically, the ADAM protein, fertilin beta .

    Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Egg Isolation

Mature oocytes were collected from 8-12-wk-old ICR female mice (Harlan Sprague Dawley Inc.) as described previously (Almeida et al., 1995). To prepare zona-free eggs, egg masses were incubated with 3 mg/ml hyaluronidase () in embryo culture medium (TE) (Spindle, 1980) for 5-10 min at 37°C to dissociate cumulus cells, and washed through three 200-µl drops of fresh TE. Eggs were further treated with 10 µg/ml of alpha -chymotrypsin () in TE for 3 min at 37°C to soften the zona pellucida. When the perivitelline space was visibly enlarged, eggs were immediately washed through two 200-µl drops of fresh TE. The loosened zonae were mechanically removed by gently passing eggs through a glass pipette ~100 µm in diameter. Eggs were placed in TE, overlaid with light mineral oil, and incubated for 1 h at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator before use. Alternatively, where indicated, egg masses were collected in M199 culture medium () supplemented with 0.4% BSA (fraction V, fatty acid free; ), 3.5 mM pyruvate (), 100 U/ml penicillin G sodium (), and 100 µg/ml streptomycin sulfate (). The egg masses were then incubated with 0.6 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 3 min, washed through three 100-µl drops of fresh M199, treated for 1 min in acidic Tyrode's solution, pH 2.5 (Hogan et al., 1994), washed through three 100-µl drops of fresh M199, and incubated in M199 for 3 h at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator before use. We have found that a 3-h resting period after a brief incubation in acidic Tyrode's solution is necessary for the recovery of egg surface proteins, including the alpha 6 integrin subunit, and for recovery of optimal fertilization competence (Takahashi et al., 1995). Experiments using eggs treated either with chymotrypsin followed by mechanical shearing and a 1-h recovery, or with acidic Tyrode's solution (followed by a 3-h recovery) to remove the zona pellucida gave similar results.

Sperm Isolation and Solubilization

Sperm were isolated from the cauda epididymis and vas deferens of ICR retired male breeders (Harlan Sprague Dawley Inc.; Hilltop) as described previously (Almeida et al., 1995). For the majority of experiments sperm were capacitated for 2 h by incubation in TE/3% BSA in a CO2 incubator at 37°C. At this time ~50% of the sperm had undergone the acrosome reaction. To prepare sperm lysates for coating fluorescent beads, sperm were washed twice with Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; ) and resuspended at 5 × 106 sperm in 0.25 ml lysis buffer (CHAPS/gelsolin) at 4°C. CHAPS/gelsolin contains 1.5% CHAPS (), 10 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml pepstatin A, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 20 µg/ml aprotonin, 50 µg/ml antipain, 2 mM benzamidine, 50 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 2.5 mM iodoacetamide, and 50 µg/ml gelsolin (gift of Dr. P. Janmey; Cytoskeleton). The sperm suspension was passed four times through a syringe with a 27-gauge needle and incubated for 4-18 h at 4°C. Lysates were centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was passed through an 0.2-µm syringe filter. For most experiments the pellet was reextracted with another 0.25 ml of CHAPS/gelsolin, passed four times through a syringe, and incubated for 4 h at 4°C. This lysate was collected, clarified by centrifugation (as above), and pooled with the original extract.

Antibodies

Antibodies were obtained from the following sources: rat anti-alpha 6 mAb GoH3 (Immunotech) and rat anti-alpha 6 mAb J1b5 (Dr. C. Damsky). A polyclonal rabbit antiserum against fertilin beta  was raised against a peptide analogue of its cytoplasmic domain. The polyclonal rabbit antiserum (anti-envelope [ENV]) against the cytoplasmic domain of the Avian Leukosis and Sarcoma Virus subtype C envelope glycoprotein was described previously (Gilbert et al., 1994). Polyclonal antibodies were purified on a column of the immunizing peptide coupled to a gel (SulfoLink Coupling Gel; ). Antibodies were eluted with 100 mM glycine, pH 2.5, immediately neutralized with 1 M Tris-HCl, and dialyzed extensively with PBS.

Peptides

14-mer peptides corresponding to the sequence of the predicted binding loop of the disintegrin domain of mouse fertilin beta , as well as a scrambled fertilin beta  sequence, were synthesized on a peptide synthesizer (Symphony; Protein Technologies) and purified by HPLC. The following sequences were used: fertilin beta , CRLAQDEADVTEYC; and scrambled fertilin beta , CETADYQRVECLDC. Peptides were amidated at the COOH terminus and acetylated at the NH2 terminus. The two terminal cysteine residues were protected with acetoamidomethyl groups. Peptides were dissolved in DMSO to a concentration of 25 mM, and diluted to 250 µM in egg medium immediately before use.

Preparation of Protein-coated Fluorescent Beads

0.2 µm yellow-green or crimson fluorescent sulfate-derivatized latex beads (Molecular Probes, Inc.) were coated with fertilin beta  or laminin E8 as follows. To prepare fertilin beta -coated beads, beads from 10 µl of a 2% bead suspension were incubated with 10 µl of anti-fertilin beta  cytoplasmic tail antibody (0.42 mg/ml) for 4 h at 4°C on an orbital platform mixer (Clay Adams). Beads were washed twice with PBS, and incubated overnight with sperm lysates prepared as described above. To prepare beads coated with laminin E8 (gift of Dr. P. Yurchenco), beads were incubated with a solution of laminin E8 (1 mg/ml in PBS) for 2 to 3 h at 4°C on an orbital platform mixer. Fertilin- or laminin E8-coated beads were washed twice with PBS, quenched for 1 h with 0.2 mg/ml goat anti-rabbit IgG (), washed twice with PBS, and resuspended to 0.2% in PBS. Beads were used on the day of preparation and were sonicated in a water bath sonicator (Laboratory Supplies) three times for 5 s each at 4°C immediately before use.

Bead-Egg Binding Assay

20-40 zona-free eggs, prepared as described above, were pretreated for 15 min with experimental agents in 20-µl drops of TE. The divalent cation composition of TE is 2.4 mM Ca2+, 0.47 mM Mg2+. Protein-coated fluorescent beads were added to give a final concentration of 0.02%, and eggs were incubated in a 5% CO2 incubator. Alternately, where indicated, eggs were pretreated for 15 min with experimental agents, and incubated with beads in Puck's saline A (), a buffer that does not contain any divalent cations. Where indicated, eggs were pretreated with latrunculin A (Biomol) for 1 h in M199, washed three times with Puck's saline A, and incubated with beads as described above. The eggs were gently agitated every 15 min. After 1 h at 37°C, the eggs were washed with three 100-µl drops of fresh medium using an ~100 µm glass pipette. After washes, small drops containing the eggs were placed in 24-well dishes, and overlaid with light mineral oil for imaging by confocal microscopy.

Sperm-Macrophage Binding Assay

alpha 6B- and mock-transfected P388D1 cells were previously generated by transfection of cells with the pRc/CMV vector containing the human alpha 6B cDNA or vector alone; the vector alone contains the neomycin resistance gene (Shaw et al., 1993). Cells transfected with the vector alone are referred to in this paper as "mock-transfected." Subconfluent monolayers of alpha 6B- or mock-transfected P388D1 macrophages were grown in RPMI 1640 () supplemented with 15% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (HyClone Laboratories Inc.) 2 mM glutamine (), 25 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 100 U/ml penicillin G sodium, 100 µg/ml streptomycin sulfate, and 0.3 mg/ml Geneticin (G418 sulfate; ). Cells were detached from culture dishes by scraping and resuspended in RPMI to a concentration of 105 cells/ml. 5 × 104 cells were plated in 24- or 48-well tissue culture dishes (Falcon Plastics) for 3 h at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. The cells were washed twice with TE/3% BSA and pretreated with experimental agents for 15 min at 37°C. Capacitated sperm were added to a final concentration of 5 × 106 sperm/ml, and incubated for 1 h at 37°C with gentle shaking at 15-min intervals in a 5% CO2 incubator in the presence of experimental agents. Cells were washed once with TE/3% BSA, once with PBS, and fixed with 1.6% paraformaldehyde in PBS. The cultures were observed with a phase-contrast microscope and the number of sperm bound per cell was counted. Five fields per well of duplicate wells were analyzed for each condition. Each field contained ~100 cells. Cation dependence experiments were performed in Puck's saline A instead of RPMI. Cells from the same starting suspension were used for parallel sperm-macrophage binding assays and macrophage-laminin adhesion assays.

Macrophage-Laminin Adhesion Assay

Laminin adhesion assays were performed as described previously (Shaw et al., 1993) and in parallel with sperm-macrophage binding assays. Briefly, 96-well plates (Costar Plastics) were coated for 14-18 h with 20 µg/ml EHS laminin-1 () in Ca2+-, Mg2+-free PBS (), and washed three times with PBS before use. Subconfluent monolayers of transfected P388D1 macrophages were washed once with RPMI, detached from culture dishes by scraping, and resuspended in RPMI to a concentration of 5-10 × 105 cells/ml. Cell suspensions were added to the laminin-1-coated wells, and incubated for 1 h in the presence of experimental agents as indicated. Cells were washed twice with RPMI, fixed with methanol for 15 min at 25°C, stained with 0.2% crystal violet in 2% ethanol for 15 min, washed several times with water, and solubilized with 1% SDS for 1 h. Optical density was measured at 595 nm using a microplate reader (Molecular Devices Corp.). Quadruplicate samples were analyzed for each data point. Cation dependence experiments were performed in Puck's saline A instead of RPMI.

Sperm-Egg Binding Assay

Zona-free eggs were placed in 100-µl drops of TE under mineral oil or, where indicated, in drops of Puck's saline A supplemented with the indicated amount of CaCl2. Eggs were pretreated with experimental agents for 15-30 min before sperm addition. Capacitated sperm were added to give a final concentration of ~5 × 105 sperm/ml, and incubated for 1 h at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. Eggs were washed three times in fresh medium, fixed in 4% glutaraldehyde, and mounted on glass slides for observation by phase-contrast microscopy. 30-40 eggs were analyzed per condition and the average number of sperm bound per egg was determined.

Western Blotting, Biotinylation, and Immunoprecipitation of Sperm Proteins

For Western blots, sperm from the caput or cauda epididymis were isolated in M199 containing 0.1% polyvinyl alcohol () and, unless indicated, lysed in CHAPS/gelsolin as described above. The lysate was incubated with 50 µl of a 50% slurry of concanavalin A (ConA) agarose beads (Vector Laboratories Inc.) for 1 h at 4°C. The beads were washed twice with PBS, resuspended in 15 µl of 2× SDS gel sample buffer (250 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7, 12.5% sucrose, 8% SDS, 20 mM EDTA, 0.2 mg/ml bromophenol blue, and where indicated, 100 mM dithiothreitol), incubated at 95°C for 5 min, and then subjected to 10% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose (Schleicher and Schuell Inc.) and the membrane was incubated with blocking buffer (1 M glucose, 10% glycerol, 3% BSA, 1% milk, and 0.5% Tween 20 in PBS, pH 7.4) for 30 min. The nitrocellulose was then incubated with 5 µg/ml purified anti-fertilin beta  cytoplasmic tail antibody in TBST (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20 []) for 14 h at 4°C followed by incubation with goat anti-rabbit IgG coupled to horseradish peroxidase (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories Inc.) in TBST for 1 h. Horseradish peroxidase was detected by enhanced chemiluminescence.

For immunoprecipitation of fertilin beta  from solubilized sperm, ~1 million capacitated sperm from the cauda epididymis were incubated with 1 mg/ml EZ-Link sulfo-NHS-LC-biotin () for 15 min at 25°C, washed twice with PBS, and lysed in CHAPS/gelsolin as described above. Supernatants were precleared for 1 h at 4°C with 10 µl of protein A agarose beads () coupled with preimmune IgG (3 µl serum/10 µl beads) for both the anti-fertilin beta , and anti-ENV antibodies. Supernatants were divided and immunoprecipitated for 1 h at 4°C with 5 µl of protein A agarose beads coupled with either anti-fertilin beta  or anti-ENV IgGs (0.2 µg/µl beads). Beads were divided and washed either twice with PBS, or seven times with RIPA buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, 0.1% sodium deoxycholate, 150 mM NaCl). Beads were resuspended in 15 µl of 2× SDS gel sample buffer, incubated at 95°C for 5 min, and subjected to nonreducing 10% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Samples were transferred to nitrocellulose, and biotinylated proteins were detected (Vectastain ABC Elite; Vector Laboratories Inc.) by enhanced chemiluminescence.

Staining of Zona-free Eggs with FITC-Phalloidin

Zona-free eggs were prepared using acidic Tyrode's solution as described above and allowed to recover for 3 h at 37°C. Where indicated, eggs were treated for 1 h with 20 µg/ml latrunculin A in M199. Eggs were fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences), and 0.1% polyvinyl alcohol (), in PBS for 30 min at 25°C. Eggs were washed three times with blocking buffer (20 mM glycine and 2% BSA in PBS) and permeabilized with 2% Triton X-100 () in blocking buffer for 1 h at 25°C. Eggs were washed three times with blocking buffer, and incubated with 100 nM FITC-phalloidin () in blocking buffer for 30 min at 25°C. Eggs were washed four times with blocking buffer and mounted onto slides for analysis by confocal microscopy.

    Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

We previously provided evidence that the disintegrin domain of fertilin beta  (ADAM 2) can interact with the integrin alpha 6beta 1. An anti-alpha 6 mAb (GoH3) as well as peptide analogues of the fertilin beta  disintegrin loop specifically inhibited sperm-egg binding. Sperm bound more extensively to cells that expressed alpha 6beta 1 than to their nonexpressing counterparts. This binding was specifically inhibited by GoH3 and by a fertilin beta  disintegrin loop peptide analogue (Almeida et al., 1995). Since alpha 6beta 1 is a well characterized laminin receptor whose apparent avidity for laminin can be regulated experimentally, we compared the effects of agents that modify the apparent avidity of alpha 6beta 1 for laminin for their effects on binding of the ADAM protein, fertilin beta . We first compared the effects of integrin avidity/ affinity modulators on sperm and laminin binding to alpha 6-transfected cells. We also compared their effects on the ability of eggs to bind beads coated with either fertilin or laminin E8.

Inverse Effects of Integrin Avidity/Affinity Modulators on Binding of Sperm and Laminin

When transfected with the alpha 6 subunit cDNA P388D1 mouse macrophages express alpha 6 in complex with a protein the size of the beta 1 integrin subunit on the cell surface. No protein the size of the beta 4 subunit, the only other known alpha 6 binding partner (Sonnenberg et al., 1987; Hemler et al., 1989), was seen (Shaw et al., 1993). As shown previously, (Shaw et al., 1993) and in Fig. 1 a, left, alpha 6-transfected macrophages adhered to laminin to a greater extent than their mock-transfected counterparts. This adhesion could be stimulated by treatment with PMA. As shown previously (Almeida et al., 1995) and in Fig. 1 a, right, alpha 6-transfected macrophages bound more sperm than their mock-transfected counterparts. However, in contrast to its enhancing effect on laminin adhesion, PMA inhibited sperm binding to parallel cultures of alpha 6-transfected macrophages (Fig. 1 a, right). As observed previously (Shaw, L., and A. Mercurio, unpublished data), genistein, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, reversed the PMA stimulation of laminin adhesion to alpha 6-transfected macrophages (Fig. 1 b, left). In contrast, genistein restored sperm binding to parallel cultures of PMA-treated alpha 6-transfected macrophages (Fig. 1 b, right).


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Comparison of the effects of PMA and genistein on laminin and sperm binding to alpha 6-transfected P388D1 cells. (Left) Laminin adhesion and (right) sperm binding assays were performed in parallel. (a) alpha 6B-transfected cells were either untreated (hatched bars) or treated with the indicated amount of PMA (black bars). Mock-transfected P388D1 cells (gray bars) were either untreated (0) or treated with 100 ng/ml PMA (100). (b) alpha 6B-transfected cells were either maintained in normal media (no PMA, no genistein; hatched bars) or pretreated with 100 ng/ ml PMA and increasing concentrations of genistein (white bars). Laminin adhesion assays were performed in quadruplicate. Sperm binding assays were conducted in duplicate wells, and ~500 cells were counted for each condition. PMA (100 ng/ml) induced a (a, left) 3.2-fold and (b, left) 4.8-fold increase in laminin binding, and a (a, right) 6-fold and (b, right) 4.6-fold decrease in sperm binding, respectively. Values indicate average ± standard error (SE).

Inclusion of Mn2+ in the extracellular medium has also been shown to modulate integrin function. As shown previously (Shaw et al., 1993) and in Fig. 2 a, left, Mn2+ stimulated the adhesion of alpha 6-transfected macrophages to laminin. In contrast, Mn2+ inhibited sperm binding to alpha 6-transfected macrophages (Fig. 2 a, right). The number of sperm bound at 0.01 mM Mn2+ was less than at 0.05 mM Mn2+, in accordance with previous observations that some amount of a divalent cation is required for sperm binding to eggs (Yanagimachi, 1978; Evans et al., 1995). When alpha 6-transfected macrophages were incubated in medium containing 0.5 mM Mn2+ and increasing amounts of Ca2+, their ability to adhere to laminin decreased (Shaw and Mercurio, 1994) (Fig. 2 b, left). Conversely, adding increasing amounts of Ca2+ to medium containing 0.5 mM Mn2+ increased sperm binding to alpha 6-transfected macrophages (Fig. 2 b, right). Adhesion of mock-transfected cells to laminin was not increased in the presence of Mn2+ (Shaw et al., 1993; Chen, M., and J. White, unpublished data).


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Comparison of the effects of Mn2+ and Ca2+ on laminin and sperm binding to alpha 6-transfected P388D1 cells. (Left) Laminin adhesion and (right) sperm binding assays were performed in parallel on alpha 6B-transfected P388D1 cells. (a) (Open bars) Cells were incubated in Puck's saline A supplemented with increasing concentrations of MnCl2. (b) (Gray bars) Cells were incubated in Puck's saline A containing 0.5 mM MnCl2 and increasing concentrations of CaCl2. Binding in Puck's saline A containing 1.8 mM CaCl2 and 0.8 mM MgCl2 in the absence (hatched bars; alpha 6B, Ca2+/Mg2+) and presence (black bars; alpha 6B, Ca2+/ Mg2+, 100 ng/ml PMA) of 100 ng/ml PMA are shown for comparison. Data analyses are as described in the legend to Fig. 1.

Collectively, the results presented in Figs. 1 and 2 indicate that PMA and Mn2+ stimulate laminin adhesion to alpha 6-transfected macrophages, whereas PMA and Mn2+ inhibit sperm binding to these cells. Reciprocally, whereas genistein and Ca2+ inhibit the stimulatory effects of PMA and Mn2+, respectively, on laminin adhesion, they restore sperm binding to PMA- and Mn2+-treated cultures of alpha 6-transfected macrophages. Neither PMA nor Mn2+ visibly affected sperm motility (Chen, M., E. Almeida, and J. White, unpublished data).

We next tested the effects of PMA and Mn2+ on sperm binding to zona-free mouse eggs. As seen in Fig. 3 a, PMA inhibited sperm binding. Under the conditions of this experiment, we did not see evidence of egg activation, for example cortical granule exocytosis (Almeida, E., and J. White, unpublished data). Addition of Mn2+ to our basic egg medium (that contains 2.4 mM Ca2+) inhibited sperm binding (Fig. 3 b). When eggs were placed in a medium free of divalent cations and supplemented with CaCl2, we found that Ca2+ supported sperm binding. This finding corroborates previous observations that Ca2+ (~1.8 mM) is needed for optimal sperm binding (Fig. 3 c; for reviews see Yanagimachi, 1978; Fraser, 1994). We were unable to test the effect of genistein on sperm-egg binding because at the concentrations used for the alpha 6-expressing cells (Fig. 1 b, right), the eggs lysed.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Effects of PMA, Mn2+, and Ca2+ on sperm binding to zona-free eggs. (a and b) Eggs were placed in drops of TE (that contains 2.4 mM CaCl2 and 0.47 mM MgCl2), containing increasing concentrations of (a) PMA or (b) MnCl2 for 15 min, and incubated with capacitated sperm. (c) Eggs were pretreated in drops of Puck's saline A supplemented with increasing concentrations of CaCl2, and incubated with capacitated sperm. After 1 h at 37°C, eggs were washed, fixed, and analyzed for sperm binding by phase-contrast microscopy. Approximately 30 eggs were used per condition. Values indicate average ± SE.

Binding of Fertilin-coated Beads to Eggs

We next further probed the molecular basis for the apparent inverse effects of integrin avidity/affinity modulators on alpha 6-mediated binding of sperm and laminin. Since our hypothesis is that fertilin beta  (ADAM 2) is responsible, at least in part, for sperm binding to alpha 6beta 1 on eggs and on alpha 6-transfected cells, our goal was to compare the ability of mouse eggs to bind fertilin beta  and laminin. For this purpose we chose to use fluorescent beads coated with either fertilin beta  or laminin.

We first had to establish a method to solubilize fertilin beta  from mature (fertilization-competent) sperm using a nondenaturing detergent. Fertilin beta  (the ~57-kD form) from mature fertilization-competent sperm, harvested from the cauda epididymis, is highly resistant to solubilization with nonionic detergents (Fig. 4 a, lane 2; Huovila, A., E. Almeida, and J. White, unpublished data), while proteolytically processed fertilin beta  (and its larger precursors) from immature sperm, harvested from the testis, the caput epididymis (Fig. 4 a, lane 1) or to a lesser extent, the corpus epididymis, are readily solubilized in a variety of nonionic detergents (Huovila, A., E. Almeida, M. Chen, and J. White, unpublished data). Recent evidence suggests that there are alternate forms of fertilin beta  on mouse sperm (Huovila, A., I. Kärkkäinen, C. Rea, and J. White, unpublished data). The cytoplasmic tail antibody used in this paper specifically recognizes the ~57-kD form. Proteolytically processed fertilin beta  (~57 kD) from mature cauda epididymal sperm was not solubilized in our lysis buffer containing the zwitterionic detergent, CHAPS (Fig. 4 a, lane 2). However, inclusion of gelsolin, an actin severing protein, permitted us to extract fertilin beta  (~57 kD) in the CHAPS-containing lysis buffer (Fig. 4 a, lane 3). Fertilin beta  (~57 kD) from mature sperm, solubilized in CHAPS/ gelsolin (Fig. 4 a, lane 3), comigrated on a Western blot (~57 kD) with fertilin from caput epididymal sperm solubilized in the absence of gelsolin (Fig. 4 a, lane 1). The fact that gelsolin is required to solubilize fertilin beta  (~57 kD) from mature, but not from immature, sperm suggests that it is somehow associated with the actin cytoskeleton of mature sperm. These observations may be related to the developmentally regulated posterior head localization of fertilin beta  in mature fertilization-competent sperm (Blobel et al., 1990; Phelps et al., 1990; Hunnicutt et al., 1997).


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Solubilization and immunoprecipitation of fertilin beta . (a) Sperm from the caput (lane 1) or cauda (lanes 2 and 3) epididymis were recovered and solubilized in CHAPS lysis buffer in the absence (lane 1 and 2) or presence (lane 3) of gelsolin. Solubilized proteins were precipitated with ConA as described in Materials and Methods and boiled in 2× SDS gel sample buffer. Samples were subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions, transferred to nitrocellulose, and blotted with an antibody to the cytoplasmic tail of fertilin beta . The arrow indicates the major fertilin beta  band recognized on mature sperm (mol. mass = ~57 kD). The higher molecular mass band seen in lane 1 (mol. mass = ~100 kD) represents the full-length fertilin beta  precursor. - indicates blank lanes. (b) Biotinylated sperm from the cauda epididymis were solubilized in CHAPS/gelsolin, as described in Materials and Methods. Cleared lysates were immunoprecipitated with protein A agarose beads precoupled with an antibody against the fertilin beta  cytoplasmic tail (lanes 1 and 3) or a control antibody, anti-ENV (lanes 2 and 4), for 1 h at 4°C. Samples were then divided in half and washed either twice with PBS (lanes 1 and 2) or seven times with RIPA buffer (lanes 3 and 4). 1 µg anti-fertilin beta  (lane 5) or anti-ENV (lane 6) IgGs were precoupled to 5 µl protein A agarose beads, and the beads were washed twice with PBS. All samples were subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE under nonreducing conditions, transferred to nitrocellulose, and blotted with Vectastain Elite ABC reagent as described in Materials and Methods. For the sample shown in lane 7, sperm from the cauda epididymis were solubilized by direct boiling in 2× SDS gel sample buffer, subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE under nonreducing conditions, transferred to nitrocellulose, and blotted with an antibody to the cytoplasmic tail of fertilin beta . The arrow indicates the fertilin beta  band which corresponds to the ~57-kD mature fertilin lacking the prodomain and the metalloprotease domain.

We next assessed the ability of a fertilin beta  cytoplasmic tail antibody to immunoprecipitate fertilin beta  from samples of cell-surface biotinylated sperm solubilized in CHAPS/ gelsolin. The antibody precipitated a biotinylated protein of ~57 kD (Fig. 4 b, lanes 1 and 3) that comigrated with a band recognized by the same antibody on a Western blot of nonbiotinylated sperm (Fig. 4 b, lane 7). This band was not immunoprecipitated with a control antibody against the cytoplasmic tail of the Avian Leukosis and Sarcoma Virus envelope glycoprotein, anti-ENV (Fig. 4 b, lanes 2 and 4). It was also not detected in lanes containing anti- fertilin beta  or anti-ENV antibodies alone (Fig. 4 b, lanes 5 and 6). When the fertilin beta  and control immunoprecipitates were washed with PBS (Fig. 4 b, lanes 1 and 2) as opposed to the SDS-containing buffer, RIPA (Fig. 4 b, lanes 3 and 4), an additional band was detected (~37 kD), but it was not specific to the fertilin beta  immunoprecipitation. These findings suggest that fertilin beta  is the major sperm surface protein immunoprecipitated with our anti-fertilin beta  cytoplasmic tail antibody.

We asked whether fluorescent beads coated with fertilin beta  could bind specifically to eggs. To do this, fluorescent latex beads were coated with affinity-purified fertilin beta -cytoplasmic tail antibody and incubated with a CHAPS/ gelsolin lysate from mature capacitated mouse sperm. After washing, the beads were incubated with zona-free mouse eggs. As seen in Fig. 5 (left), fertilin beta -coated beads bound to eggs. If the fluorescent beads coated with the fertilin beta -cytoplasmic tail antibody were incubated in a somatic cell lysate instead of a sperm lysate, only a low level of binding was observed (Fig. 5, middle). If the fluorescent beads were coated with an irrelevant polyclonal anti-cytoplasmic tail antibody, anti-ENV, and then in a sperm lysate, only a low level of binding was observed (Fig. 5, right). These data indicate that fertilin beta -coated beads bind to zona-free mouse eggs and that this binding depends on fertilin beta .


View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Binding of fertilin-coated beads to zona-free eggs. Yellow-green fluorescent latex beads were coated with an antibody (AB) against the fertilin beta -cytoplasmic tail (anti-fertilin) or with a control antibody (anti-ENV). Beads were then incubated in either a sperm (sperm) or a macrophage (cell) lysate (LYS.). After the beads were quenched (with anti-rabbit IgG), washed, and sonicated, they were incubated with eggs for 1 h in TE as described in Materials and Methods. The eggs were washed and analyzed by confocal microscopy. Paired fluorescence and phase-contrast images from a representative experiment are shown.

We next explored the molecular basis for the fertilin beta -bead binding to eggs. As seen in Fig. 6, a fertilin beta  peptide analogue inhibited binding of fertilin beta -coated beads to eggs (Fig. 6, beta ) whereas a scrambled fertilin beta  disintegrin loop peptide analogue did not (Fig. 6, beta scr). We next tested the effects of GoH3, a function-blocking anti-alpha 6 mAb (Sonnenberg et al., 1988) and J1B5, a non-function-blocking anti-alpha 6 mAb (Damsky et al., 1992). As seen in Fig. 6, GoH3 decreased fertilin bead-binding to eggs (compare GoH3 with Ct). In contrast, J1B5 did not inhibit binding of fertilin beta -coated beads. In fact, J1B5 appeared to enhance the binding of fertilin-coated beads (Fig. 6, J1B5). The enhancing effect of J1B5 was seen in replicate experiments. We have recently observed similar inhibitory and stimulatory effects of GoH3 and J1B5, respectively, on the binding of fluorescent beads coated with a recombinant fertilin beta  disintegrin domain expressed in insect cells (Bigler, D., M.S. Chen, Y. Takahashi, E.A.C. Almeida, and J.M. White, manuscript in preparation). Collectively, the results presented in Fig. 6 indicate that binding of fertilin beta -coated beads to eggs is mediated, at least in part, by the disintegrin loop of fertilin beta  and by the integrin alpha 6 subunit.


View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Effects of fertilin beta  peptide analogues and anti-alpha 6 antibodies on binding of fertilin-coated beads to zona-free eggs. Eggs in TE were either untreated (Ct) or preincubated with 250 µM freshly dissolved peptide analogue (14 residues) corresponding to either the predicted binding domain of fertilin beta  (beta ) or a scrambled fertilin beta  peptide (beta scr). In other samples, eggs were preincubated with 100 µg/ml of either a function-blocking (GoH3) or a non-function-blocking (J1B5) anti-alpha 6 mAb. Eggs were assayed for binding of fertilin-coated beads as described in the legend to Fig. 5. Paired fluorescence and phase-contrast images from a representative experiment are shown.

Inverse Effects of Integrin Avidity/Affinity Modulators on Binding of Fertilin- and Laminin E8-coated Beads to Mouse Eggs

We next assessed the effects of integrin avidity/affinity modulators on the binding of fertilin- (Figs. 7 and 10) and laminin E8- (see Figs. 8-10) coated fluorescent beads to mouse eggs. Because beads coated with whole laminin formed large aggregates in suspension, we used the elastase digestion fragment, E8, which contains the major integrin alpha 6beta 1 binding domain (Goodman, 1992; Yurchenco and O'Rear, 1994). We first analyzed fertilin- (Fig. 7) and laminin E8- (see Figs. 8 and 9) bead binding individually. We then analyzed fertilin and laminin E8 bead binding in a competition experiment (see Fig. 10). As seen in Fig. 7 a, PMA (middle) and Mn2+ (right) inhibited binding of fertilin beta -coated beads to mouse eggs (fertilin-bead binding in the presence of Mg2+ alone [1 mM] was similar to that seen in the Ca2+/Mg2+ control media; Almeida, E., M. Chen, and J. White, unpublished data). As seen in Fig. 7 b, the effect of PMA on fertilin bead binding was dose-dependent.


View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Effects of PMA and Mn2+ on binding of fertilin-coated beads to zona-free eggs. Eggs were collected in M199 medium and treated with acidic Tyrode's solution to remove the zonae, and allowed to recover for 3 h at 37°C in M199 as described in Materials and Methods. (a) Eggs were placed in Puck's saline A containing either 1.8 mM CaCl2 and 0.8 mM MgCl2 (Ct), 1.8 mM CaCl2, 0.8 mM MgCl2 and 50 ng/ml PMA (PMA), or 1 mM MnCl2 (Mn2+). For the PMA samples, eggs were pretreated with PMA for 10 min. Eggs were assayed for binding of fertilin-coated beads as described in the legend to Fig. 5. (b) Eggs were placed in Puck's saline A containing 1.8 mM CaCl2, 0.8 mM MgCl2, and the indicated concentration of PMA. Eggs were pretreated with PMA for 10 min and assayed for the binding of fertilin-coated beads as described above. Paired fluorescence and phase-contrast images from representative experiments are shown.


View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Comparison of the effects of Mn2+ and Ca2+ on binding of fertilin- and laminin E8-coated beads to zona-free eggs. Eggs were either (a and b) maintained in normal TE medium or (c and d) pretreated for 15 min in TE containing 1 mM MnCl2. Eggs were incubated with a 1:1 mixture of crimson beads precoated with the laminin E8 digestion fragment and yellow-green beads coated with fertilin beta  as described in Materials and Methods. After 1 h at 37°C, the eggs were washed and observed by confocal microscopy. Paired fluorescence (a and c) and phase-contrast (b and d) images from a representative experiment are shown.


View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Effects of PMA and Mn2+ on binding of laminin E8- coated beads to eggs. Beads were coated with laminin E8 as described in Materials and Methods. Eggs were collected and freed of their zonae pellucidae as described in the legend to Fig. 7 and Materials and Methods. (a) Eggs were pretreated with either 100 ng/ml PMA or 1 mM MnCl2, incubated with laminin E8-coated beads for 1 h at 37°C, and washed and observed with a confocal microscope. (b) Eggs were incubated with laminin E8-coated beads for 1 h at 37°C in Puck's saline A containing increasing amounts of MnCl2 as indicated. Eggs were washed and observed with a confocal microscope. Paired fluorescence and phase-contrast images from representative experiments are shown.


View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Effect of anti-alpha 6 antibodies on binding of laminin E8- coated beads to eggs. Eggs were pretreated with 100 µg/ml GoH3 or J1B5 in TE in the presence of 1 mM MnCl2, incubated for 1 h at 37°C with laminin E8-coated beads, washed, and observed by confocal microscopy. Paired fluorescence and phase-contrast images from a representative experiment are shown.

We next assessed the effects of PMA and Mn2+ on the ability of fluorescent beads coated with the laminin E8 fragment to bind to mouse eggs. Although mouse eggs express significant levels of alpha 6 on their surface, presumably in complex with beta 1 (Tarone et al., 1993; Almeida et al., 1995; Evans et al., 1997; Chen, M., and J. White, unpublished data), the eggs as we isolated and prepared them (in a Ca2+-containing medium) showed virtually no affinity for the laminin E8 beads (Fig. 8 a, left). Treatment with PMA did not induce binding of laminin E8-coated beads (Fig. 8 a, middle). However, Mn2+ dramatically increased binding of laminin E8-coated beads (Fig. 8 a, right). The stimulation of laminin E8-bead binding first occurred at ~50-100 µM Mn2+ and reached a maximum at 200 µM Mn2+ (Fig. 8 b). Binding of laminin E8-coated beads to eggs in the presence of Mn2+ was inhibited by GoH3 (Fig. 9, middle) but not by J1B5 (Fig. 9, right). Fluorescent beads coated with the laminin elastase digestion fragment E3, which binds to dystroglycan (Ekblom, 1996), did not bind to eggs under any conditions tested (Almeida, E., M. Chen, and J. White, unpublished data).

It has been shown recently that in order for alpha 6 to be switched into its high binding state (for laminin) by PMA, but not by Mn2+, it must be cleaved into its two disulfide-bonded subunits (Delwel et al., 1996). Given the phenotype of laminin E8 binding to eggs (Fig. 8 a), we investigated whether the alpha 6 subunit on the egg is proteolytically processed. We detected significant levels of proteolytically processed alpha 6 on the egg surface. The apparent molecular masses of the two subunits on reducing SDS gels were ~120 and ~30 kD (Chen, M., and J. White, unpublished data), in good agreement with the sizes reported for the alpha 6 subunit from somatic cells (Delwel et al., 1996). Therefore, a lack of proteolytic processing does not appear to be responsible for the absence of PMA responsiveness observed in the laminin E8-egg binding assay. The fact that PMA induces adhesion of alpha 6-expressing somatic cells to laminin but does not induce laminin E8 binding to eggs may be due to either fundamental differences between the alpha 6beta 1 integrin in eggs versus somatic cells (see Discussion) or simply due to differences between a laminin adhesion assay versus a laminin bead-binding assay.

We next directly compared the ability of mouse eggs to bind fertilin- and laminin E8-coated beads in Ca2+- and Mn2+-containing egg medium. To do this, a mixture of approximately equal numbers of yellow-green beads coated with fertilin beta  and crimson beads coated with laminin E8 were incubated with eggs in TE medium, which contains 2.4 mM Ca2+, with or without additional Mn2+. Eggs in Ca2+-containing medium bound large numbers of fertilin-coated beads (yellow-green) but virtually no laminin E8- coated beads (crimson) (Fig. 10, left). In striking contrast, eggs in Mn2+-supplemented egg medium bound large numbers of laminin E8-coated beads (crimson), and a significantly reduced number of fertilin-coated beads (yellow-green) (Fig. 10, right).

Integrin function and clustering have been shown to be dependent upon cytoskeletal linkages (Kucik et al., 1996; Lub et al., 1997; Yauch et al., 1997). Therefore, we examined the effects of latrunculin, an agent that inhibits actin polymerization and sequesters actin monomers (Spector et al., 1989; Lamaze et al., 1997), on the binding of fertilin beta - and laminin E8-coated beads to eggs. Fertilization-competent mouse eggs normally display dense cortical actin, as visualized by phalloidin staining, particularly concentrated over the meiotic spindle (Reima and Lehtonen, 1985; Longo, 1987). Treatment of eggs with latrunculin significantly decreased the amount of polymerized actin stained with phalloidin (Fig. 11, top). Parallel treatment with latrunculin decreased fertilin beta  bead binding to eggs (Fig. 11, middle), but did not increase laminin E8 bead binding (Fig. 11, bottom).


View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11.   Effect of latrunculin on staining of egg actin with FITC-phalloidin and binding of fertilin- and laminin E8-coated beads to eggs. Eggs were collected in M199 medium and treated with acidic Tyrode's solution to remove the zonae and allowed to recover for 3 h at 37°C in M199 as described in Materials and Methods. Where indicated, eggs were pretreated for 1 h at 37°C with 20 µg/ml latrunculin A in M199. For actin staining (top) eggs were fixed and treated with FITC-phalloidin as described in Materials and Methods. For bead binding (middle and bottom) eggs were washed into Puck's saline A containing 1 mM CaCl2 (CT and latrunculin) or 0.5 mM MnCl2 (Mn2+) and incubated with fertilin beta - (middle) or laminin E8- (bottom) coated fluorescent beads. Activation of laminin E8 binding by Mn2+ is shown for comparison (bottom, far right). After 1 h at 37°C, the eggs were washed and observed by confocal microscopy. Paired fluorescence and phase-contrast images from a representative experiment are shown. Latrunculin did not inhibit binding of laminin E8 beads to Mn2+-treated eggs (Chen, M., and J. White, unpublished data).

    Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

In previous work we presented evidence that the integrin alpha 6beta 1, on both eggs and alpha 6-transfected somatic cells, can interact with the ADAM protein, fertilin beta  (Almeida et al., 1995). Here we present additional evidence for this interaction. Beads coated with fertilin beta  captured from a sperm lysate bind to eggs in a manner that is specifically inhibited by both a fertilin beta  disintegrin loop peptide analogue as well as the anti-alpha 6 mAb, GoH3. Analogous studies using beads coated with fertilin beta  disintegrin domain-containing constructs made in insect cells (Bigler, D., M.S. Chen, Y. Takahashi, E.A.C. Almeida, and J.M. White, manuscript in preparation) as well as with an ELISA (Huovila, A., and J. White, unpublished data) corroborate this conclusion. In a recent study using a fertilin beta  construct produced in bacteria, Evans et al. (1997) concluded that fertilin beta  interacts with a beta 1 integrin on the egg but not with alpha 6beta 1. The difference in results may stem from the use of recombinant proteins produced in bacterial (Evans et al., 1997) versus eukaryotic (Bigler, D., et al., manuscript in preparation) systems coupled with other technical differences.

Since it appears that alpha 6beta 1 can interact with the ADAM protein fertilin beta  as well as with its well-characterized ECM ligand laminin, we tested the hypothesis that different states of alpha 6beta 1 interact with fertilin beta  and laminin. To do this we compared the effects of agents that modulate laminin adhesion to alpha 6beta 1 on the ability of cells transfected with alpha 6 to adhere to laminin or to bind sperm. We tested the ability of eggs to bind beads coated with either fertilin or laminin. Finally, we compared the effect of the actin cytoskeletal-disrupting agent, latrunculin, on fertilin and laminin bead-binding to eggs.

With alpha 6-transfected cells we found that agents that increase laminin binding (e.g., PMA, Mn2+) inhibit sperm binding. Conversely, agents that inhibit laminin binding enhance sperm binding. In our second set of experiments we found that eggs in Ca2+-containing medium bind beads coated with fertilin, but do not bind beads coated with the laminin E8 fragment. In Mn2+-containing medium, however, eggs show a decided preference for laminin E8-coated beads. PMA treatment of eggs inhibited binding of fertilin-coated beads, but did not induce binding of laminin E8-coated beads. Disruption of the egg actin cytoskeleton with latrunculin also decreased binding of fertilin-coated beads, but did not induce binding of laminin E8-coated beads.

Three State Model for the Egg Integrin alpha 6beta 1

Our data support the hypothesis that different states of the integrin alpha 6beta 1 support binding of the ADAM protein fertilin beta  and the ECM protein laminin. Although previous studies have shown that integrins can be activated from low to high avidity/affinity states for interacting with particular ligands or antibodies (Faull and Ginsberg, 1995; Bazzoni and Hemler, 1998), and although in the case of alpha 2beta 1 it has been shown that activation of the integrin increases its binding avidity for ECM ligands (collagen and laminin) but not for a non-ECM ligand, echovirus (Bergelson et al., 1993), our findings are the first to suggest that different states of an integrin prefer a cell surface or an ECM ligand. The classical resting state of alpha 6beta 1 supports binding of fertilin but not laminin. In this respect binding of the disintegrin domain of fertilin beta  to the resting state of alpha 6beta 1 resembles the ability of snake disintegrins to bind to the off state of the platelet integrin (Gould et al., 1990; Williams, 1992; Niewiarowski et al., 1994). Conversely, the activated state of alpha 6beta 1 on the egg strongly supports laminin binding but discourages fertilin binding.

As outlined above, our data suggest that the egg alpha 6beta 1 integrin can exist in a state, exemplified by native fertilization-competent eggs, that supports binding of the ADAM protein fertilin beta  but not laminin (Fig. 12, left). It can also exist in a state exemplified by treating eggs with Mn2+ that strongly prefers binding laminin and disfavors the ADAM (Fig. 12, right). Our data further suggest that alpha 6beta 1 on the egg can exist in a third state, exemplified by treating eggs with phorbol esters or latrunculin, with limited affinity for either ligand (Fig. 12, middle). It may be that in the unfertilized egg alpha 6beta 1 is tethered to the cortical actin cytoskeleton and binds the ADAM protein fertilin beta  (Fig. 12, left). Release from cytoskeletal anchorage (induced in vitro by treatment with either latrunculin or PMA; Fig. 12, middle) may promote lateral diffusion of the integrin (Kucik et al., 1996; Yauch et al., 1997). Increase in the lateral mobility of alpha 6beta 1 may in turn disfavor binding between alpha 6beta 1 and fertilin and may be a prerequisite for interaction between alpha 6beta 1 and laminin. High avidity adhesion of laminin to alpha 6beta 1 may require subsequent clustering of alpha 6beta 1 and/or changes in its conformation (mimicked in vitro by treatment with Mn2+; Fig. 12, right). It should be noted that in addition to binding different states of the alpha 6beta 1 integrin, fertilin beta  and laminin may bind to different sites on the integrin. Approximately 5-10-fold more GoH3 is required to inhibit binding of fertilin beta  than to inhibit binding of laminin.


View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 12.   Summary of ligand binding states of alpha 6beta 1 on the egg. Eggs in Ca2+ strongly prefer to bind fertilin (left). Eggs in Mn2+ strongly prefer to bind laminin (right). PMA- or latrunculin-treated eggs bind significantly less fertilin than untreated eggs, but do not bind laminin (middle). Binding of both fertilin and laminin to eggs is inhibited by GoH3, but not by J1B5.

Possible Mechanisms for Regulating Different States of the Egg Integrin alpha 6beta 1

We are currently considering two possibilities for how the integrin alpha 6beta 1 is kept in an on state for fertilin, and in an off state for laminin in unfertilized eggs. The first is that the alpha 6 or beta 1 subunits in the egg may differ from those expressed in somatic cells. Although we have found both the alpha 6A and alpha 6B alternatively spliced cytoplasmic tail isoforms in the egg, at both the mRNA (Almeida et al., 1995) and protein (Chen, M., Y. Takahashi, and J. White, unpublished data) levels, and although we have detected significant levels of proteolytically processed alpha 6 on the egg surface, it is possible that the alpha 6 or beta 1 subunits on the egg represent alternatively spliced forms of their ectodomains (Delwel et al., 1995; Ziober et al., 1997) or may be differently posttranslationally modified. The second, and our currently favored, possibility is that on the egg the alpha 6beta 1 integrin is associated with a specific set of integrin-associated proteins that may include both plasma membrane and cytoplasmic proteins (Shattil et al., 1995; Berditchevski et al., 1996; Fenczik et al., 1997; Wei et al., 1997). Such integrin-associated proteins may, in turn, influence how the alpha 6beta 1 integrin is associated with the actin cytoskeleton (Berditchevski et al., 1996; Hemler, 1998).

Implications for Fertilization and Zygotic Development

Since we have shown that the integrin alpha 6beta 1 on the egg is in an off state for binding laminin and in an on state for binding fertilin, and we can experimentally induce a switch in its binding state, it is possible that alpha 6beta 1 exists in alternate binding states during development; for example in oocytes or embryos. We are particularly interested in ascertaining whether (and when) postfertilization alpha 6beta 1 may switch to a state that disfavors fertilin and favors laminin. Such a switch (or switches, see Fig. 12) may be relevant to both the noted block to polyspermy that occurs at the egg plasma membrane (Horvath et al., 1993; Maluchnik and Borsuk, 1994) as well as to the noted requirement for alpha 6beta 1 to support endoderm cell outgrowth on laminin at the time of uterine implantation (Stephens et al., 1993; Sutherland et al., 1993). It is still not clear whether the interaction between fertilin beta  and alpha 6beta 1 is required for fertilization in vivo, and if so, for what stages of gametogenesis and/or fertilization. For example, in the testes alpha 6beta 1 is expressed on Sertoli cells at sites devoid of laminin but adjoining developing spermatids (Salanova et al., 1995). Interactions between fertilin beta  or other sperm ADAMs and alpha 6beta 1 on Sertoli cells (in an on state for the ADAM) may be involved in Sertoli cell-spermatid interactions. In addition, ADAM-alpha 6beta 1 interactions could be involved during the long journey that sperm make through the male and female reproductive tracts before reaching the egg (Cho et al., 1998).

Implications for Other ADAM-Integrin Interactions

Evidence has been presented that the ability of an integrin to organize a specific ECM ligand binding site can be developmentally regulated (Ramos and DeSimone, 1996; Martin-Bermudo et al., 1998). Hence, it seems plausible that there might be developmental situations, in addition to fertilization, when cells use differential regulation of an integrin for binding ECM ligands and cell surface coreceptors, such as ADAMs (Wolfsberg and White, 1996). For example, integrin subunits, including alpha 6 and beta 1, are expressed in developing dermal epithelial cells at sites of cell-cell contacts (Hertle et al., 1991) and their coreceptors at these cell contact sites are not known. If their coreceptors are ADAMs, a switch in the affinity of the alpha 6 integrin from a laminin to an ADAM binding mode may be a key step in the switch from a cell-ECM mode, for binding to the basement membrane, to a cell-cell binding mode, upon leaving the basement membrane.

Given the large number of different ADAMs and integrins and their widespread distributions, it is plausible that many more ADAM-integrin interactions exist. The disintegrin domain of ADAM 15 has been reported recently to interact with the integrin alpha vbeta 3 (Zhang et al., 1998). It will be interesting to see whether binding of ADAM 15 and fibronectin are inversely regulated by avidity/affinity modulators as we have seen here for ADAM 2 and laminin interacting with alpha 6beta 1. As more ADAM-integrin interactions are identified, it will be interesting to determine their roles in development and their mechanisms of regulation.

    Footnotes

Address correspondence to Dr. Judith M. White, University of Virginia, Department of Cell Biology, Health Sciences Center Box 439, Charlottesville, VA 22908. Tel.: 804-924-2593. Fax: 804-982-3912. E-mail: jw7g{at}virginia.edu

Received for publication 12 August 1998 and in revised form 24 November 1998.

   The first two authors contributed equally.
   Present addresses: Dr. A.-P.J. Huovila, Inst. Medical Technology, Univ. Tampere, Tampere, Finland FIN-33101; Dr. E.A.C. Almeida, Dept. Stomatology, Univ. California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0512.

We thank the following individuals for their generous gifts: Dr. Peter Yurchenco, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, for the laminin E8 fragment; Dr. Paul Janmey, Harvard University, for gelsolin; Dr. Caroline Damsky, University of California at San Francisco, for the J1B5 mAb; and the Biomolecular Research Facility at the University of Virginia for synthesis of disintegrin loop peptide analogues. We also thank Drs. Douglas DeSimone and Ann Sutherland for critical suggestions on the manuscript, and Dr. Gene Marcantonio for suggesting that we test a cytoskeletal disrupting agent.

This work was supported by a grant (GM48739) from the National Institutes of Health to J.M. White. A. Huovila was supported in part by a fellowship from the Human Frontiers Science Program Organization. M. Chen was supported in part by a Medical Scientist Training Program grant, and a Cell and Molecular Biology Training grant (University of Virginia). Y. Takahashi was supported by fellowships from the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists and from the Lalor Foundation.

    Abbreviations used in this paper

ADAM, a disintegrin and metalloprotease; ECM, extracellular matrix; ENV, envelope; TE, embryo culture medium.

    References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1. Almeida, E.A.C., A.-P.J. Huovila, A.E. Sutherland, L.E. Stephens, P.G. Calarco, L.M. Shaw, A.M. Mercurio, A. Sonnenberg, P. Primakoff, D.G. Myles, and J.M. White. 1995. Mouse egg integrin alpha 6beta 1 functions as a sperm receptor. Cell. 81: 1095-1104
2. Bazzoni, G., and M.E. Hemler. 1998. Are changes in integrin affinity and conformation overemphasized? Trends Biochem. Sci. 23: 30-34
3. Berditchevski, F., M.M. Zutter, and M.E. Hemler. 1996. Characterization of novel complexes on the cell surface between integrins and proteins with 4 transmembrane domains (TM4 proteins). Mol. Biol. Cell. 7: 193-207 [Abstract].
4. Bergelson, J.M., B.M. Chan, R.W. Finberg, and M.E. Hemler. 1993. The integrin VLA-2 binds echovirus 1 and extracellular matrix ligands by different mechanisms. J. Clin. Invest. 92: 232-239
5. Bigler, D., M. Chen, S. Waters, and J.M. White. 1997. A model for sperm-egg binding and fusion based on ADAMs and integrins. Trends Cell Biol. 7: 220-225 .
6. Black, R.A., and J.M. White. 1998. ADAMs: focus on the protease domains. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10: 654-659
7. Blobel, C.P., D.G. Myles, P. Primakoff, and J.M. White. 1990. Proteolytic processing of a protein involved in sperm-egg fusion correlates with the acquisition of fertilization competence. J. Cell Biol. 111: 69-78 [Abstract].
8. Blobel, C.P., T.G. Wolfsberg, C.W. Turck, D.G. Myles, P. Primakoff, and J.M. White. 1992. A potential fusion peptide and an integrin ligand domain in a protein active in sperm-egg fusion. Nature. 356: 248-252
9. Brown, E., and N. Hogg. 1996. Where the outside meets the inside: integrins as activators and targets of signal transduction cascades. Immunol. Lett. 54: 189-193
10. Cho, C., D.O. Bunch, J.-E. Faure, E.H. Goulding, E.M. Eddy, P. Primakoff, and D.G. Myles. 1998. Fertilization defects in sperm from mice lacking fertilin beta . Science. 281: 1857-1859 [Abstract/Free Full Text].
11. Clark, E.A., and J.S. Brugge. 1995. Integrins and signal transduction pathways: the road taken. Science. 268: 233-239
12. Damsky, C.H., M.L. Fitzgerald, and S.J. Fisher. 1992. Distribution patterns of extracellular matrix components and adhesion receptors are intricately modulated during first trimester cytotrophoblast differentiation along the invasive pathway, in vivo. J. Clin. Invest. 89: 210-222
13. DeLuca, M., C.M. Ward, K. Ohmori, R.K. Andrews, and M.C. Berndt. 1995. Jararhagin and jaracetin: novel snake venom inhibitors of the integrin collagen receptor, alpha 2beta 1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 206: 570-576
14. Delwel, G.O., I. Kuikman, and A. Sonnenberg. 1995. An alternatively spliced exon in the extracellular domain of the human alpha 6 integrin subunit: functional analysis of the alpha 6 integrin variants. Cell Adhes. Commun. 3: 143-161
15. Delwel, G.O., F. Hogervorst, and A. Sonnenberg. 1996. Cleavage of the alpha 6A subunit is essential for activation of the alpha 6Abeta 1 integrin by phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 7293-7296 [Abstract/Free Full Text].
16. Diamond, M.S., and T.A. Springer. 1994. The dynamic regulation of integrin adhesiveness. Curr. Biol. 4: 506-517
17. Ekblom, P.. 1996. Receptors for laminins during epithelial morphogenesis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8: 700-706
18. Evans, J.P., R.M. Schultz, and G.S. Kopf. 1995. Mouse sperm-egg plasma membrane interactions: analysis of roles of egg integrins and the mouse sperm homologue of PH-30 (fertilin) beta . J. Cell Sci. 108: 3267-3278 [Abstract/Free Full Text].
19. Evans, J.P., G.S. Kopf, and R.M. Schultz. 1997. Characterization of the binding of recombinant mouse sperm fertilin beta  subunit to mouse eggs: evidence for adhesive activity via an egg beta 1 integrin-mediated interaction. Dev. Biol. 187: 79-93
20. Faull, R., and M.H. Ginsberg. 1995. Dynamic regulation of integrins. Stem Cells (Dayt). 13: 38-46 [Abstract].
21. Fenczik, C.A., T. Sethl, J.W. Ramos, P.E. Hughes, and M.H. Ginsberg. 1997. Complementation of dominant suppression implicates CD98 in integrin activation. Nature. 390: 81-85
22. Fraser, L.R.. 1994. Na+ requirements for capacitation and acrosomal exocytosis in mammalian sperm. Int. Rev. Cytol. 149: 1-49
23. Gichuhi, P.M., W.C.L. Ford, and L. Hall. 1997. Evidence that peptides derived from the disintegrin domain of primate fertilin and containing the ECD motif block the binding of human spermatozoa to the zona-free hamster oocyte. Int. J. Androl. 20: 165-170
24. Gilbert, J.M., P. Bates, H.E. Varmus, and J.M. White. 1994. The receptor for the subgroup A avian leukosis sarcoma virus binds to subgroup A but not to subgroup C envelope glycoprotein. J. Virol. 67: 6889-6892 [Abstract].
25. Goodman, S.L.. 1992. alpha 6beta 1 integrin and laminin E8: an increasingly complex simple story. Kidney Int. 41: 650-656
26. Gould, R.J., M.A. Polokoff, P.A. Friedman, T.-F. Huang, J.C. Holt, J.J. Cook, and S. Niewiarowski. 1990. Disintegrins: a family of integrin inhibitory proteins from viper venoms. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 195: 168-171 [Abstract].
27. Hato, T., N. Pampori, and S.J. Shattil. 1998. Complementary roles for receptor clustering and conformational change in the adhesive and signaling functions of integrin alpha IIbbeta 3. J. Cell Biol. 141: 1685-1695 [Abstract/Free Full Text].
28. Hemler, M.E.. 1998. Integrin associated proteins. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10: 578-585
29. Hemler, M.E., C. Crouse, and A. Sonnenberg. 1989. Association of the VLA alpha 6 subunit with a novel protein. A possible alternative to the common VLA beta 1 subunit on certain cell lines. J. Biol. Chem. 264: 6529-6535 [Abstract/Free Full Text].
30. Hertle, M.D., J.C. Adams, and F.M. Watt. 1991. Integrin expression during human epidermal development in vivo and in vitro. Development. 112: 193-206 [Abstract].
31. Hogan, B., R. Beddington, F. Constantini, and E. Lacy. 1994. Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. 415.
32. Horvath, P.M., T. Kellom, J. Caulfield, and J. Boldt. 1993. Mechanistic studies of the plasma membrane block to polyspermy in mouse eggs. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 34: 65-72
33. Hughes, P.E., M.W. Renshaw, M. Pfaff, J. Forsyth, V.M. Keivens, M.A. Schwartz, and M.H. Ginsberg. 1997. Suppression of integrin activation: a novel function of a Ras/Raf-initiated MAP kinase pathway. Cell. 88: 521-530
34. Hunnicutt, G.R., D.E. Koppel, and D.G. Myles. 1997. Analysis of the process of localization of fertilin to the sperm posterior head plasma membrane during sperm maturation in the epididymis. Dev. Biol. 191: 146-159
35. Hynes, R.O., and A.D. Lander. 1992. Contact and adhesive specificities in the associations, migrations, and targeting of cells and axons. Cell. 68: 303-322
36. Jia, L.G., K. Shimokawa, J.B. Bjarnason, and J.W. Fox. 1996. Snake venom metalloproteinases: structure, function, and relationship to the ADAMs family of proteins. Toxicon. 34: 1269-1276
37. Kamiguti, A.S., C.R. Hay, and M. Zuzel. 1996. Inhibition of collagen-induced platelet aggregation as the result of cleavage of alpha 2beta 1-integrin by the snake venom metalloproteinase jararhagin. Biochem. J. 320: 635-641
38. Kucik, D.F., M.L. Dustin, J.M. Miller, and E.J. Brown. 1996. Adhesion-activating phorbol ester increases the mobility of leukocyte integrin LFA-1 in cultured lymphocytes. J. Clin. Invest. 97: 2139-2144 [Abstract/Free Full Text].
39. Lamaze, C., L.M. Fujimoto, H.L. Yin, and S.L. Schmid. 1997. The actin cytoskeleton is required for receptor-mediated endocytosis in mammalian cells. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 20332-20335 [Abstract/Free Full Text].
40. Longo, F.J.. 1987. Actin-plasma membrane associations in mouse eggs and oocytes. J. Exp. Zool. 243: 299-309
41. Lub, M., Y. van Kooyk, S.J. van Vliet, and C.G. Figdor. 1997. Dual role of the actin cytoskeleton in regulating cell adhesion mediated by the integrin lymphocyte function-associated molecule-1. Mol. Biol. Cell. 8: 341-351 [Abstract].
42. Lum, L., and C.P. Blobel. 1997. Evidence for distinct serine protease activities with a potential role in processing the sperm protein fertilin. Dev. Biol. 191: 131-145
43. Maluchnik, D., and E. Borsuk. 1994. Sperm entry into fertilized mouse eggs. Zygote. 2: 129-131
44. Martin-Bermudo, M.D., O.M. Dunin-Borkowski, and N.H. Brown. 1998. Modulation of integrin activity is vital for morphogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 141: 1073-1081 [Abstract/Free Full Text].
45. Mercurio, A.M., and L.M. Shaw. 1991. Laminin binding proteins. Bioessays. 13: 469-473
46. Myles, D.G., L.H. Kimmel, C.P. Blobel, J.M. White, and P. Primakoff. 1994. Identification of a binding site in the disintegrin domain of fertilin required for sperm-egg fusion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91: 4195-4198 [Abstract].
47. Niewiarowski, S., M.A. McLane, M. Kloczewiak, and G.J. Stewart. 1994. Disintegrins and other naturally occurring antagonists of platelet fibrinogen receptors. Semin. Hematol. 31: 289-300
48. Phelps, B.M., D.E. Koppel, P. Primakoff, and D.G. Myles. 1990. Evidence that proteolysis of the surface is an initial step in the mechanism of formation of sperm cell surface domains. J. Cell Biol. 111: 1839-1847 [Abstract].
49. Porter, J.C., and N. Hogg. 1998. Integrins take partners: cross-talk between integrins and other membrane receptors. Trends Cell Biol. 8: 390-396 .
50. Ramos, J.W., and D.W. DeSimone. 1996. Xenopus embryonic cell adhesion to fibronectin: position-specific activation of RGD/synergy site-dependent migratory behavior at gastrulation. J. Cell Biol. 134: 227-240 [Abstract].
51. Reima, I., and E. Lehtonen. 1985. Localization of nonerythroid spectrin and actin in mouse oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Differentiation. 30: 68-75
52. Salanova, M., M. Stefanini, I. De Curtis, and F. Palombi. 1995. Integrin receptor alpha 6beta 1 is localized at specific sites of cell-cell contact in rat seminiferous epithelium. Biol. Reprod. 52: 79-87 [Abstract].
53. Shattil, S.J., T. O'Toole, M. Eigenthaler, V. Thon, M. Williams, B.M. Babior, and M.H. Ginsberg. 1995. beta 3-endonexin, a novel polypeptide that interacts specifically with the cytoplasmic tail of the integrin beta 3 subunit. J. Cell Biol. 131: 807-816 [Abstract].
54. Shaw, L.M., and A.M. Mercurio. 1993. Regulation of alpha 6beta 1 integrin laminin receptor function by the cytoplasmic domain of the alpha 6 subunit. J. Cell Biol. 123: 1017-1025 [Abstract].
55. Shaw, L.M., and A.M. Mercurio. 1994. Regulation of cellular interactions with laminin by integrin cytoplasmic domains: the A and B structural variants of the alpha 6beta 1 integrin differentially modulate the adhesive strength, morphology, and migration of macrophages. Mol. Biol. Cell. 5: 679-690 [Abstract].
56. Shaw, L.M., M.M. Lotz, and A.M. Mercurio. 1993. Inside-out integrin signaling in macrophages. Analysis of the role of the alpha 6Abeta 1 and alpha 6Bbeta 1 integrin variants in laminin adhesion by cDNA expression in an alpha 6 integrin-deficient macrophage cell line. J. Biol. Chem. 268: 11401-11408 [Abstract/Free Full Text].
57. Sonnenberg, A., H. Janssen, F. Hogervorst, J. Calafat, and J. Hilgers. 1987. A complex of platelet glycoproteins Ic and IIa identified by a rat mAb. J. Biol. Chem. 262: 10376-10383 [Abstract/Free Full Text].
58. Sonnenberg, A., P.W. Modderman, and F. Hogervorst. 1988. Laminin receptor on platelets is the integrin VLA-6. Nature. 336: 487-489
59. Spector, I., N.R. Shochet, D. Blasberger, and Y. Kashman. 1989. Latrunculins: novel marine macrolides that disrupt microfilament organization and affect cell growth. I. Comparison with cytochalasin D.  Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 13: 127-144
60. Spindle, A.. 1980. An improved culture medium for mouse blastocysts. In Vitro. 16: 669-674
61. Stephens, L.E., J.E. Sonne, M.L. Fitzgerald, and C.H. Damsky. 1993. Targeted deletion of beta 1 integrins in F9 embryonal carcinoma cells affects morphological differentiation but not tissue-specific gene expression. J. Cell Biol. 123: 1607-1620 [Abstract].
62. Strulovici, B., S. Daniel-Issakani, G. Baxter, J. Knopf, L. Sultzman, H. Cherwinski, J.J. Nestor, D.R. Webb, and J. Ransom. 1991. Distinct mechanisms of regulation of protein kinase C epsilon by hormones and phorbol esters. J. Biol. Chem. 266: 168-173 [Abstract/Free Full Text].
63. Sutherland, A.E., P.G. Calarco, and C.H. Damsky. 1993. Developmental regulation of integrin expression at the time of implantation in the mouse embryo. Development. 119: 1175-1186 [Abstract/Free Full Text].
64. Takahashi, Y., C. Meno, E. Sato, and Y. Toyoda. 1995. Synchronous sperm penetration of zona-free mouse eggs in vitro. Biol. Reprod. 53: 424-430 [Abstract].
65. Tarone, G., M.A. Russo, E. Hirsch, T. Odorisio, F. Altruda, L. Silengo, and G. Siracusa. 1993. Expression of beta 1 integrin complexes on the surface of unfertilized mouse oocyte. Development. 117: 1369-1375 [Abstract/Free Full Text].
66. van Kooyk, Y., P. Weder, K. Heije, and C.G. Figdor. 1994. Extracellular Ca2+ modulates leukocyte function-associated antigen-1 cell surface distribution on T lymphocytes and consequently affects cell adhesion. J. Cell Biol. 124: 1061-1070 [Abstract].
67. Waters, S.I., and J.M. White. 1997. Biochemical and molecular characterization of bovine fertilin alpha  and beta  (ADAM 1 and ADAM 2): a candidate sperm-egg binding/fusion complex. Biol. Reprod. 56: 1245-1254 [Abstract].
68. Wei, J., L.M. Shaw, and A.M. Mercurio. 1997. Integrin signaling in leukocytes: lessons from the alpha 6beta 1 integrin. J. Leukocyte Biol. 61: 397-407 [Abstract].
69. Williams, J.A.. 1992. Disintegrins: RGD-containing proteins which inhibit cell matrix interactions (adhesion) and cell-cell interactions (aggregation) via the integrin receptors. Pathol. Biol. 40: 813-821
70. Wolfsberg, T.G., and J.M. White. 1996. ADAMs in fertilization and development. Dev. Biol. 180: 389-401
71. Yanagimachi, R.. 1978. Calcium requirement for sperm-egg fusion in mammals. Biol. Reprod. 19: 949-958
72. Yauch, R.L., D.P. Felsenfeld, S.-K. Kraeft, L.B. Chen, M.P. Sheetz, and M.E. Hemler. 1997. Mutational evidence for control of cell adhesion through integrin diffusion/clustering, independent of ligand binding. J. Exp. Med. 186: 1347-1355 [Abstract/Free Full Text].
73. Yuan, R., P. Primakoff, and D.G. Myles. 1997. A role for the disintegrin domain of cyritestin, a sperm surface protein belonging to the ADAM family, in mouse sperm-egg plasma membrane adhesion and fusion. J. Cell Biol. 137: 105-112 [Abstract/Free Full Text].
74. Yurchenco, P.D., and J. O'Rear. 1994. Basement membrane assembly. Methods Enzymol. 245: 489-518
75. Zhang, X.-P., T. Kamata, K. Yokoyama, W. Puzon-McLaughlin, and Y. Takada. 1998. Specific interaction of the recombinant disintegrin-like domain of MDC-15 (Metargidin, ADAM-15) with integrin alpha vbeta 3. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 7345-7350 [Abstract/Free Full Text].
76. Ziober, B.L., Y. Chen, and R.H. Kramer. 1997. The laminin-binding activity of the alpha 7 integrin receptor is defined by developmentally regulated splicing in the extracellular domain. Mol. Biol. Cell. 8: 1723-1734 [Abstract].

Copyright © 1999 by The Rockefeller University Press.
0021-9525/99/02/549/13 $2.00