From the Department of Medical Genetics and Microbiology, University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 1A8, Canada
Received for publication, March 5, 2003 , and in revised form, April 8, 2003.
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
|
|
Several crystal structures of the Cre-lox complexes have provided remarkable insights into the conformations of the various intermediates in the Cre-lox reaction (21, 2327). Two Cre-bound loxP sites are brought together by a cyclic network of protein-protein interactions to form an approximately square-planar synaptic complex (Fig. 1a) (21, 2330). The two Cre molecules bound to a lox site are conformationally and functionally different: one is poised to cleave the DNA ("cleaving" subunit), and the other is in an inactive conformation ("non-cleaving" subunit; see Fig. 1a) (21, 2327).
Cre catalyzes recombination with a defined order of strand exchange (see Fig. 1, a and b): it first cleaves and exchanges the two bottom strands adjacent to the scissile G nucleotide to form the Holliday intermediate (11, 2932) that is then resolved preferentially on the top strand adjacent to the scissile A nucleotide to generate reciprocal recombinant products (11, 3133). We found previously that the order of strand exchange was dictated primarily by the scissile base pairs at positions 4' and 4 in the loxP site (32, 33). The order of strand exchange was reversed when the scissile base pairs were interchanged in the mutated lox4 site (see Fig. 1c). Furthermore, we found that Lys-86, which contacts the scissile nucleotides (21, 2327), is important for establishing the strand selectivity in the resolution of the loxP-Holliday intermediate but not in the initiation of recombination between the loxP sites (32, 33).
The crystal structure of the Cre-lox synaptic complex reveals the presence of an asymmetric DNA bend in the lox spacer region, positioned 5 bp away from the activated cleavage site (25). Guo et al. (25) proposed that the position and/or direction of the DNA bend dictate the site of initial strand exchange. In this report we have further characterized the roles of the scissile base pairs and the Lys-86 residue in the Cre-induced DNA bending to better understand the basis for the order of strand exchange. We find that Cre induces asymmetric bends in the loxP site, and the position of the bends is dictated by the scissile base pairs: the binding of one Cre molecule (complex I, cI)1 induces a bend near the margin of the spacer region adjacent to the scissile G nucleotide, whereas the binding of two Cre molecules (complex II, cII) induces a bend near the center of the spacer region with a slight bias toward the scissile A (see Fig. 1, b and c). Lys-86 has a role in positioning the Cre-induced bend in the loxP cI, but not in the loxP cII. Changes in the Cre-induced DNA bends within cII correlate with the site of initial strand exchange as originally proposed by Guo et al. (25). We present a model relating the position of the Cre-induced bends to the order of strand exchange in the Cre-catalyzed recombination reaction.
![]() |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The circularly permuted plasmids were constructed by ligating the 40 bp of annealed, complementary oligonucleotides 5'-tcgac(lox)g-3'/3'-g(lox)cagct-5', containing the lox sequence of interest (Table I) flanked by SalI ends, into SalI-digested pBend2 (34). This results in the insertion of the lox site between two tandemly repeated sets of restriction enzyme sites. The circularly permuted DNA substrates were obtained by digestion of the plasmid with EcoRV, SmaI, NruI, SspI, BamHI, MluI, BglII, NheI, and SpeI, and isolation of the 162-bp digested fragments.
The phasing plasmids were constructed by excising the 156-bp BamHI-BamHI DNA fragment from the plasmids pK10, pK12, pK14, pK16, pK18, and pK20 (35) and ligating in the 90-bp annealed, complementary oligonucleotides: 5'-GATCCACGATCAGACTGCAGCCATGGCACG(lox)GCTAAGATCTCAGAATCTGGCTATCG-3'/3'-GTGCTAGTCTGACGTCGGTACCGTGC(lox)CGATTCTAGAGTCTTAGACCGATAGCCTAG-5' containing the lox sequence of interest (Table I). Constructs containing the lox site inserted in the forward and reverse orientations were isolated. Phasing substrates were obtained by isolating the 347- to 357-bp RsaI-PvuII fragments. The loxSA site introduced a novel RsaI site in the symmetric spacer region and so the loxSA phasing substrates were obtained by PCR using the primers RsaI2959F (5'-ACATATTGTCGTTAGAACGCG-3') and PvuII270R (5'-CTGGCTTATCGAAATTAATAC-3'). 0.2 µg of the loxSA phasing plasmid was amplified in 50 µl of 3 mM MgCl2, 0.4 mM of each dNTPs, 1 mM of each primers, 2.5 units of Taq polymerase (Invitrogen) for 35 PCR cycles of heating at 95 °C for 45 s, 55 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min. The 347- to 357-bp PCR products were purified on a preparative 4% native PAGE. Note that the S182 substrates used in the recombination assays previously described (32) were 182-bp SacI-PvuII fragments isolated from the phasing plasmids pK10LPA and pK10L4A, which are pK10-derived plasmids with the loxP and lox4 sites, respectively, inserted in the forward orientation.
All oligonucleotides were synthesized by Invitrogen. The procedures for the purification of the oligonucleotides, annealing, and 5'-32P labeling the DNA substrates were as described previously (32, 33). The restriction enzymes and T4 polynucleotide kinase were from New England BioLabs. The Cre proteins were purified from an induced Escherichia coli BL21(DE3 pLysS) culture as described previously (33, 36).
DMS Methylation Protection Analysis2 nM S82 substrate (5'-32P-labeled on either the top or the bottom strand) was incubated with 0.5 µM Cre in 50 µl of 50 mM sodium cacodylate, pH 8, 30 mM NaCl, and 0.05 mg/ml denatured calf thymus DNA at room temperature for 15 min. The reaction was then treated with 3.3 µl of 10% DMS (v/v, diluted in ethanol, Aldrich) at room temperature for 6 min (37). Analysis of a 5-µl aliquot of the DMS-treated reaction on a native 6% polyacrylamide gel showed that cII was the predominant species with some unbound substrate, cI, and higher order complexes present (data not shown) (32). The DMS reaction was quenched as described previously (38). The modified DNA was cleaved at methylated G > A residues in alkali as described by Craig and Nash (39) and concentrated by ethanol precipitation. The cleaved DNA was analyzed by 8% denaturing PAGE (Diamed SequaGel).
Dried gels were scanned using a Amersham Biosciences Phosphor-Imager and quantified using the ImageQuaNT 5.0 software program. The peak intensity of each band was expressed relative to the total intensity in the lane and then normalized to the relative intensity of the band corresponding to nucleotide "25 G" on the top strand or "19' G" on the bottom strand (Fig. 2, a and b). The extent of protection or enhancement was calculated as a ratio of the normalized relative band intensities in the presence or absence of Cre (+ to Cre ratio).
|
OP-Cu Footprinting2nM S82 substrate (5'-32P labeled on either the top or the bottom strand) was incubated with 1 µM Cre in 20 µl of Cre reaction buffer (32) for 30 min at room temperature. The OP-Cu footprinting (Supplementary Data, Fig. S1) was performed as described by Sigman et al. (40). The chemicals used in the OP-Cu reactions (1,10-phenanthroline and 3-mercaptopropionic acid) were from Sigma. The OP-Cu reaction was quenched with 1 µl of 28 mM neocuproine (Sigma) and 100 µl of 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA, 0.3 M sodium acetate, 20 µg/ml yeast tRNA, followed by phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. The DNA was analyzed by 8% denaturing PAGE (Diamed SequaGel).
Circular Permutation AnalysisThe binding assay was performed by electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) as described previously (32) with the following modifications. 2 nM 5'-32P-labeled circular permutation substrates (obtained by digestion with various restriction enzymes as described above) was incubated with 0.05 µM Cre, and the reaction was analyzed on a 5% polyacrylamide gel. Determination of the bend centers and angles by circular permutation is described in detail in the Supplementary Data (Fig. S2).
Phasing AnalysisThe binding assay was performed by EMSA as described previously (32) with the following modifications. 2 nM 5'-32P-labeled phasing substrates was incubated with 0.05 µM Cre, and the reaction was analyzed on a 4% polyacrylamide gel. Dried gels were scanned using an Amersham Biosciences PhosphorImager and analyzed using the ImageQuaNT 5.0 software program. The marker M bands in each lane were aligned. The phasing analysis was conducted according to the method of Zinkel and Crothers (35) as follows. The relative electrophoretic mobility (µ) of a protein-DNA complex was calculated as the mobility of the complex divided by the mobility of the unbound substrate to correct for small variations in the mobility of the unbound substrate. The relative mobility was then normalized to the average relative mobility (µave) of the particular complex from all six phasing substrates (µ/µave). The normalized relative mobilities were plotted as a function of the linker length. The linker length is defined as the distance (bp) between the center of the kinetoplast DNA that contains the A-tracts (35) and the middle of the lox site. The curve was plotted to the best fit polynomial curve (Microsoft Excel).
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Cre Increases the Sensitivity to DMS Methylation in the loxP and lox4 Spacer Region on the Strand Containing the Scissile GDNA footprinting provides information about protein-DNA contacts and distortions in the DNA conformation such as bending and unwinding (4044). To detect subtle changes in the DNA conformation, we probed the Cre-bound DNA using small chemical compounds. We first analyzed the sensitivity of guanine and adenine residues in the loxP and lox4 sites to methylation by dimethyl sulfate (DMS). DMS methylates the N7 group of guanine in the major groove of DNA and, to a lesser extent, the N3 group of adenine in the minor groove (41).
An 82-bp DNA substrate (S82) containing either the wild type loxP or the mutated lox4 site was treated with DMS in the absence and presence of the wild type Cre protein (Fig. 2). The DMS footprints for the top and bottom strands are shown in Fig. 2 (a and b) and summarized in Fig. 2c. The two strands of the loxP and lox4 sites differed in the sensitivity of their spacer region to DMS modification upon binding to Cre, and the differences were dependent on the location of the scissile G. The scissile G at position 4 on the bottom strand of loxP (Fig. 2b, lane 2) was protected by the wild type Cre protein, and this protection was dependent on Lys-86 (see below). Bases 3' to the scissile G on the bottom strand of loxP (most notably position 3'A) exhibited enhanced reactivity to DMS upon binding to Cre. These enhanced sensitivities suggested that Cre causes structural alterations in the lox spacer region, possibly due to DNA bending (see "Discussion").
Cre also protected the scissile G and enhanced the DMS methylation of downstream bases (2'G, 1A, 3G, and 5T) on the top strand of lox4 (Fig. 2a, lane 6). The increased sensitivity to DMS was stronger on the top strand of lox4 than on the bottom strand of loxP. Because T residues are normally not methylated by DMS, the enhanced cleavage at position 5T on the top strand of lox4 suggests a significant conformational alteration near this position. Cre also caused hypermethylation of the scissile 4A on the bottom strand of lox4, whereas the corresponding scissile 4'A on the top strand of loxP did not exhibit increased reactivity to DMS. Using 1,10-phenanthroline-copper (OP-Cu), we also detected subtle differences in the spacer regions of loxP and lox4 when incubated with Cre (see Supplementary Data, Fig. S1). The Cre-induced DMS and OP-Cu footprinting patterns in the symmetry elements were similar for loxP and lox4 (Figs. 2 and S1) and generally agree with the contacts seen in the Cre-lox crystal structures (21, 2327).
Lys-86 Contacts the Scissile G in Both loxP and lox4 Because Lys-86 influences the order of strand exchange (32, 33), we investigated the role of Lys-86 in the conformation of the Cre-lox complexes by mutating Lys-86 to Ala (K86A). Although the Cre K86A mutant protein is fused to a N-terminal His10 tag, the His-tagged wild type (HisWt) Cre protein exhibited similar properties to the non-tagged wild type Cre protein (Figs. 2 and S1) (32, 33).
We found that the K86A mutation relieved the protection of the scissile G from DMS methylation in both loxP (Fig. 2b, lane 4) and lox4 (Fig. 2a, lane 8). This supports the observation from several Cre-lox crystal structures that Lys-86 contacts the scissile G nucleotide (2325). The K86A mutation not only relieved the protection but strongly increased the reactivity of the scissile G to DMS methylation compared with the substrate without any protein added. The hyper-reactivity of the scissile G in the presence of Cre K86A required DMS treatment (data not shown), indicating that the hyper-reactivity was not due to Cre-catalyzed cleavage. The Lys-86-dependent protection of the scissile G was also observed in the DMS footprint of the substrate "se b" that contains only symmetry element b (Table I; data not shown). This suggests that the interaction between Lys-86 and the scissile G nucleotide does not require the binding of a Cre dimer. Bases 3' to the scissile G on the bottom strand of loxP and on the top strand of lox4 remained sensitive to DMS methylation when bound to Cre K86A. Furthermore, the Cre K86A mutant protein generally increased the sensitivity of the central region of the loxP and lox4 spacer to OP-Cu compared with the wild type protein (Fig. S1). The Cre K86A-induced DMS and OP-Cu footprinting patterns in the symmetry elements were similar to the wild type Cre protein.
Cre Bends loxP Toward the Major Groove Near the Middle of the Spacer RegionBecause the chemical footprinting analyses showed evidence for Cre-induced conformational changes in the spacer region of the lox site, we used circular permutation and phasing analyses to detect the Cre-induced DNA bending in the lox site. Bent DNA migrates more slowly than unbent DNA in a polyacrylamide gel due to its shorter end-to-end distance (46).
We first used circular permutation analysis to map the position and angle of the Cre-induced DNA bends (Table II, Fig. 1(b and c), and Supplementary Data, Figs. S2S6) (46, 47). The binding of a Cre monomer (cI) induces a bend of 35 ± 5° in the symmetry element generally near the margin of the spacer region ("cI bend"). The binding of two Cre molecules (cII) induces a bend of 55 ± 5° in the lox site near the center of the spacer region ("cII bend"). However, the small bend angles made it difficult to position the bend center accurately (see Supplementary Data, Fig. S7) and to interpret the significance of small differences between loxP and lox4. In addition, circular permutation cannot distinguish between a directed bend and a non-directed protein-induced flexure of the DNA (35, 47, 48).
|
We found that Cre induced a directed bend in the loxP site. The electropherogram of wild type Cre bound to the loxP-containing phasing fragments is shown in Fig. 3b (lanes 16). The unbound substrates themselves exhibited a slight phasing in their mobility, suggesting that the lox-containing DNA possessed an intrinsic bend. Both cI and cII exhibited phase-dependent variations in gel mobility with a periodicity of about 10 bp indicative of a directed bend (Fig. 3c). The amplitude for the cII phasing curve was about 2-fold greater than that obtained for cI (cI, 0.04 versus cII, 0.08), suggesting that cII exhibited a larger bend angle than cI and supporting the relative bend angles measured by circular permutation analysis (Fig. S2c and Table II). The relative mobility of the Cre-loxP cI and cII reached a minimum mobility at a linker length (Lmin) of 116 and 115 bp, respectively (Fig. 3c), both of which correspond to about 11 helical turns with a helical repeat of 10.5 bp/turn. Because the A-tract is bent toward the major groove at the center of the kinetoplast DNA and the two in-phase bends are separated by an integral number of turns, we concluded that the Cre-induced bends in cI and cII were also toward the major groove in the middle of the loxP site (the arbitrarily designated reference center). This is further confirmed by analysis of the trans isomer in which the two out-of-phase bends were separated by 121 (cI) or 120 bp (cII), corresponding to 11.5 turns (Fig. 3c). From the circular permutation analysis (Fig. S2c), we estimated that the Cre-induced bend center in cI is close to position 4, about half a helical turn from the reference phasing center, and so, Cre bends the loxP in cI toward the minor groove at position 4. In contrast, the bend center in cII is near position 1' (close to the reference phasing center), and so, the loxP in cII is bent toward the major groove near the middle of the spacer region.
Cre Induces an Asymmetric Bend in loxPAn asymmetrically positioned DNA bend was observed in the crystal structure of the Cre-lox synaptic complex (25). We assessed the asymmetry of the Cre-induced bend in the loxP site by comparing the relative phasing of the loxP site in the forward and reverse orientations. The 90-bp test fragment containing the loxP site precisely in its middle was inserted into the phasing vectors in either the forward (F) or the reverse (R) orientation (Fig. 3a). Therefore, the linker length between the A-tract and the middle of the lox site was the same in both orientations. Because the position and magnitude of the Cre-induced bends should be identical regardless of the orientation of the fragment, differences in the relative mobility between the two orientations would reflect a difference in the position of the actual Cre-induced bend center relative to the A-tracts. If the center of the Cre-induced bend is exactly in the middle of the lox site (i.e. at the reference center) and the DNA is bent toward one of the grooves, then the phasing curves should be the same for both orientations (46). On the other hand, if Cre induces an asymmetric DNA bend, then the actual distance between the two bends would be different in the two orientations and hence, the phasing curves would be altered (unless the difference is a full helical turn).
We found that wild type Cre does indeed bend the loxP site asymmetrically and that the asymmetric bend is dictated by the asymmetric spacer sequence. The gel mobility shown in Fig. 3 (b and c) was for the forward orientation, "loxP-F," which corresponds to the orientation of the loxP site illustrated in Fig. 1b. In Fig. 3d, we compare the relative mobility of the Cre-loxP cII bound to the "loxP-F" substrates and the reverse "loxP-R" substrates. We found that the two phasing curves were slightly different: the "loxP-R" curve was consistently shifted by about +1 bp relative to the "loxP-F" curve. The "loxP-F" and "loxP-R" cII had Lmin values of 115 and 116 bp, respectively, both of which still correspond to a bend toward the major groove in the middle of the loxP sequence (11 turns, 10.5 bp/turn). Therefore, reversing the orientation of the loxP site causes a small but highly reproducible shift in the phasing curves, suggesting that the Cre-induced bend in the cII was asymmetrically positioned in the loxP site. Asymmetry in the cI bend was also seen (Table II) and is discussed in more detail in a later section.
If the apparent asymmetry in the Cre-induced DNA bend is indeed due to the asymmetric loxP site and not to differences in the flanking non-lox sequences, then a symmetric lox site should abolish this asymmetry and the phasing curves would be the same in both the forward and reverse orientations. In fact, we found that the Cre-induced bend was indeed positioned symmetrically in both the symmetric loxSA and loxSB substrates (Table I), with an Lmin of around 115.5 bp in both orientations for cI and cII (Table II and Fig. S8). Therefore, the asymmetric Cre-induced bend in the loxP site is dictated by the asymmetric spacer sequence.
The Scissile Base Pairs Determine the Cre-induced DNA Bends: the Cre-induced Bends in lox4 Resemble Those for loxP in the Reverse OrientationThe DMS footprint induced by Cre in the lox4 spacer region was almost the reverse of that for loxP (Fig. 2). To investigate whether the Cre-induced bends in loxP and lox4 exhibit a similar inverse relationship, we also constructed two sets of lox4 phasing substrates with the lox4-containing DNA inserted in the forward ("lox4-F") and reverse ("lox4-R") orientations. The electrophoretic mobility shift assay of the "lox4-F" phasing substrates is shown in Fig. 3b (lanes 712) and the phasing curves are plotted in Fig. 3e. We observed differences between the phasing of the Cre-lox4 and the Cre-loxP complexes with the most notable difference being in cII (Fig. 3d). We discuss the differences in cI at a later section. Although the cII bend centers in loxP and lox4 differed by only 1 bp by circular permutation (Figs. 1b, 1c, S2, and S3), we confirmed by phasing analysis that they were indeed different and asymmetric (Fig. 3d). Recall that the relative mobility of the "loxP-F" cII had a Lmin of 115 bp (Fig. 3b, lane 3). In contrast, the "lox4-F" cII reached an apparent minimum gel mobility at a linker length of 117 bp (Fig. 3b, lane 10). After we corrected for the intrinsic bend in the substrate, the phasing curve for the "lox4-F" cII reproducibly had a Lmin of 116 bp, a +1 bp shift relative to "loxP-F" (Fig. 3d). Therefore, although Cre appears to bend the lox4 site in the same general direction as loxP (i.e. toward the major groove at the center of the lox4 site), the 1-bp difference in phasing may reflect the 1-bp difference in the position of the bend center measured by circular permutation (Fig. 1, b and c). The Cre-induced DNA bend in lox4, like that in loxP, was asymmetrically positioned, because the cII phasing curve for "lox4-R" was shifted by almost 1.5 bp relative to "lox4-F" (Fig. 3d). Interestingly, the phasing curve for "lox4-F" cII coincided with that for loxP in the reverse orientation ("loxP-R") and correspondingly, the "lox4-R" curve resembled the "loxP-F" curve. Therefore, the effect of interchanging the 4' and 4 bp is analogous to reversing the entire loxP site.
Single Symmetry Elements and cI: Wild Type Cre Bends loxP and lox4 Near the Scissile G Base Pair in cIWe wished to examine whether the asymmetric lox spacer sequence also influences the Cre-induced bend in cI. Because cI formed on a full lox site may consist of a mixture of complexes of a Cre molecule bound to either the left or the right symmetry element, we constructed lox half-sites in which we replaced one or the other symmetry element with a random sequence to disrupt Cre binding (Table I and Fig. 4a). The "se a" substrates contain an intact left symmetry element a and spacer region, but the right symmetry element had been disrupted. Similarly, the "se b" substrates have a mutated left element and an intact right symmetry element b. Note that symmetry elements a and b have identical sequence and are defined by their position relative to the asymmetric spacer sequence (Fig. 1b).
|
We detected a difference in the phasing of the cI bound to "se a-F " and "se b-F " (forward orientation): the Lmin for "se a-F " was at 115.1 bp, whereas that for "se b-F " was at 116.4 bp (Fig. 4b, lanes 3 and 10, and Fig. 4c). The distance of Lmin was calculated using the middle of the spacer region as the reference center, which does not correspond to the bend centers determined by circular permutation: position 8' for se a and position 6 for se b (Fig. S4). For example, the bend center in se b is separated by (115.1 + 5.5) or 121 bp from the A-tracts in the cis isomer, and 121 bp corresponds to 11.5 turns with a helical repeat of
10.5 bp/turn, implying that Cre bends se b toward the minor groove at position 6.
The se a-F and se b-F phasing substrates differ in the distance of the functional symmetry element relative to the A-tracts: symmetry element a is closer to the A-tracts than the more distal symmetry element b in the forward orientation (Fig. 4a). The 1-bp difference in the Lmin for the phasing curve of se a-F and se b-F may simply reflect this difference in relative distance. To better evaluate the two symmetry elements, we compared substrates in which the distance of the functional symmetry element relative to the A-tracts was the same, but the orientation of the spacer sequence was reversed. For example, the functional symmetry element in the "se a-F " and the "se b-R" substrates are proximal (closer) to the A-tracts than the functional symmetry element in the "se a-R" and "se b-F " substrates, which are more distal to the A-tracts (Fig. 4a). The relative mobility profile of the "se a-F " substrates was similar to the proximal "se b-R" substrates, and conversely, the distal pairs "se a-R" and "se b-F " were similar to each other (Fig. 4d). Therefore, Cre appears to bend se a and se b toward the minor groove near the margin of the spacer region independently of the spacer sequence.
However, in a full lox site with two competing symmetry elements, the spacer sequence influences the predominant cI species. The cI bends induced by wild type Cre in loxP and lox4 mapped to opposite ends of the spacer region by circular permutation (Fig. 1, b and c, and Supplemental Figs. S2 and S3) and phasing analyses (Fig. 4d). The cI bend in the loxP site was at the scissile G adjacent to symmetry element b, and its phasing curve resembled that of the se b substrate more closely than that of the se a substrate. In contrast, the cI bend in the full lox4 site was in symmetry element a (also adjacent to the scissile G), and its phasing curve resembled that of the se a substrate. The differences in the cI phasing between the forward and reverse orientations were smaller (0.5 bp) for the full lox substrates than the individual single symmetry elements (≥1 bp; Table II). This may have been due to the shuffling of the Cre monomer between the left and the right symmetry elements during electrophoresis (37, 49). In conclusion, the wild type Cre bends loxP and lox4 near the scissile G base pair in cI, and this suggests preferential binding of the first Cre molecule to the adjacent symmetry element (see "Discussion").
Lys-86 Is Important for the Positioning of the Cre-induced DNA Bend in loxP and lox4 cIBecause Lys-86 contacts the scissile bases (21, 2327) and affects the order of strand exchange (32, 33), we investigated its role in the position and direction of the Cre-induced bends. Mutation of Lys-86 to Ala (K86A) dramatically altered the position of the DNA bend in cI, shifting the bend center (determined by circular permutation) by 11 bp from position 4 to position 8' in loxP (Figs. 1b and S5b) and shifting the Lmin in the phasing analysis by 1 bp to a linker length of about 115 bp (Fig. 5b). Note that the phasing curve for Cre K86A-loxP cI resembled that of the substrate se a (Table II), positioning the Cre K86A-induced cI bend in loxP in symmetry element a adjacent to the scissile AT base pair. The K86A mutation did not significantly affect the position of the cI bend in the single symmetry element substrates se a and se b (Fig. 1b and Table II), suggesting that Lys-86 is not involved in actually bending the DNA but rather in selecting the symmetry element to be occupied by the first Cre monomer within a full lox site (see "Discussion"). The K86A-loxP cII exhibited a similar phasing profile to wild type Cre-loxP cII with a Lmin of about 115 bp (Fig. 5c), suggesting that both these proteins induced a similar cII bend in loxP. Circular permutation analysis revealed that Cre K86A also bends loxP at similar position to the wild type Cre protein in cII (Figs. 1b and S5c). Therefore, Lys-86 is important for positioning the cI bend in loxP but has little if any role in directing the cII bend.
|
In contrast to loxP, Lys-86 influences both the cI and cII bends in lox4 (Figs. 6 and S6). As in loxP, the cI bend centers for the wild type and K86A Cre protein were located at opposite ends of the lox4 spacer region (Wt Cre, at position 5' in the left symmetry element; Cre K86A, position 4 near the right margin of the spacer; Figs. 1c and S6b). The Lmin for the phasing curve of the Cre K86A-lox4 cI was 116 bp, a difference of 1 bp from that for the wild type Cre-lox4 cI (Fig. 6b) and close to that for the substrate se b (Table II). Hence, Cre K86A bends both the loxP and lox4 sites near the scissile AT base pair, whereas wild type Cre bends the DNA near the scissile GC base pair in cI.
|
Unlike loxP, the K86A mutation also altered the cII bend in lox4, shifting the phasing curve by 0.4 bp relative to wild type Cre with the lox4-F substrates (Fig. 4c). Although the difference in the cII bend between the wild type and K86A Cre proteins is small, this difference was also evident and slightly larger (0.7 bp) in the lox4-R substrates (Table II). The K86A-lox4 cII appeared to be bent symmetrically around the middle of the lox4 site, analogous to the bends in the symmetrical loxSA and loxSB sites (Fig. S7). The difference in Lmin for the Cre K86A cII bound to the lox4-F and lox4-R substrates was only
0.3 bp (Fig. 6d), which is smaller than the 1.4-bp difference in Lmin between the two orientations for the wild type Cre-lox4 cII (Fig. 3d). This symmetric cII bend induced by Cre K86A correlates with its loss of strand preference in the initiation of strand exchange in lox4 (see "Discussion") (32).
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In the Cre-lox crystal structures, the two DNA strands adopt different conformations and are contacted differently in the spacer region by the cleaving and non-cleaving Cre subunits (21, 2327). The "continuous" strand contains the inactive scissile phosphate and is on the concave side of the DNA bend (Fig. 1a) (25). It makes numerous direct contacts with the N-terminal domain of the cleaving Cre subunit directly opposite the activated scissile phosphate. The more extended "crossing" strand contains the activated scissile phosphate and is contacted directly by the Cre molecules only at the activated scissile phosphate and scissile nucleotide but not throughout the rest of the spacer region (25). The crossing strand points toward the center cavity of the synapse ready for strand exchange after cleavage (Fig. 1a).
The major differences in the Cre-induced footprints of loxP and lox4 were in the spacer region (Fig. 2). The footprints within the lox4 site were similar to those for the loxP site in the reverse orientation. Cre increased the sensitivity to DMS methylation of the bases in the spacer region on the strand containing the scissile G nucleotide in both loxP and lox4. We propose that the DMS-sensitive, scissile G-containing strand corresponds to the more exposed "crossing" strand in both loxP and lox4 complexes (Fig. 7, see below).
|
The conformational alterations seen in the chemical footprints are supported by changes in the Cre-induced DNA bending measured by circular permutation and phasing analyses (Fig. 1, b and c, and Table II). The cI bends induced by the wild type Cre protein in loxP and lox4 were both situated near the scissile G base pair where recombination initiates (11, 2932). Likewise we demonstrated that the cII bends in the loxP and lox4 sites were different and asymmetric (Fig. 3d). The cII bends induced by the wild type Cre protein in loxP and lox4 were near the middle of the spacer region with a slight bias toward the scissile A. In fact, interchanging the scissile base pairs as in the lox4 site resulted in changes similar to those seen by inverting the entire loxP site by 180°. Therefore, the scissile base pairs dictate the Cre-induced DNA bending and the order of strand exchange (32).
Model for DNA Bending and the Order of Strand ExchangeWe have demonstrated that the Cre-induced DNA bends in loxP and lox4 correlate with our previously observed alteration in the site of initial strand exchange (32), confirming the original proposal by Guo et al. (25). We present in Fig. 7 a revision of the model proposed by Guo and colleagues (25). We propose that the first Cre molecule binds preferentially to the symmetry element adjacent to the scissile G and induces a cI bend near the margin of the spacer. We speculate that because this Cre molecule is bound adjacent to the initial cleavage site, it may be in a "pre-activation/cleaving" conformation even prior to the binding of the second Cre monomer. The binding of a second Cre molecule redirects the bend asymmetrically toward the middle of the spacer region away from the scissile G. Within the cII and/or synaptic complex, the strand containing the scissile G adopts the "crossing" configuration (as suggested by the footprinting analysis) and is cleaved adjacent to the scissile G. Interchanging the scissile base pairs as in the lox4 site reverses the DNA bend induced by Cre from those in loxP and, as a consequence, alters the order of strand exchange (32).
The proposed preferential binding of Cre to a particular symmetry element in cI remains to be verified. Kinetic and equilibrium studies indicate that Cre binds the individual symmetry elements a and b with similar affinity (50). In addition, we did not detect preferential protection of one symmetry element relative to the other element on a full lox site by footprint analyses of the isolated cI (data not shown).
We found that Cre induced a 35° cI bend in both loxP and lox4; this small cI bend may correspond to the 25° smooth bend observed within each symmetry element in the crystal structures of the Cre-lox synaptic complex (21, 2327). We measured a cII bend of
55° toward the major groove at position 1' in loxP and at position 1 in lox4. Our cII bends resemble most closely the DNA bend observed in the Cre-lox crystal structures for the covalent cleavage intermediate and the Holliday intermediate in which the DNA was bent near the center of the spacer region toward the major groove (23, 24). However, our results differ to some extent from the asymmetric DNA bend observed in the crystal structure of the Cre-loxS synaptic complex in which the DNA was bent 78° toward the minor groove between positions 2/3 (or 2'/3') (25). It is possible that the DNA bend angles within a cII in solution and a crystallized synaptic complex are different. The latter consists of two lox sites and four Cre molecules. The act of synapsis and/or crystallization may alter the bend angle and position. Furthermore, because the bend angle measured by circular permutation analysis was small, the positioning of the bend was subject to appreciable error (see Supplementary Data, Fig. S7). The circular permutation analysis may also underestimate the magnitude of the Cre-induced DNA bend (48, 51). Other possible reasons for the discrepancies include the type of Cre proteins and lox sites used. The crystal structures were solved using mutant Cre R173K and Y324F proteins to block cleavage (25), whereas we used wild type and K86A Cre proteins. In addition, Guo et al. (25) used a symmetric loxS, which corresponds to our loxSB sequence (Table I). Although we did not determine the position of the cII bend center in our symmetrical lox substrates, we observed symmetric bends in these substrates by phasing analysis. It is possible that the symmetric phasing curves represent an average of rapidly alternating, asymmetric bends as seen in the crystal structures (25). Correspondingly, the Cre-loxP and Cre-lox4 cII may also consist of rapidly alternating isomers whose bend center and direction may not correspond precisely to the overall average measured. Nevertheless, the predominant cII species is different for loxP and lox4.
Lys-86 and DNA BendingThe scissile base pairs of the lox spacer region are critical in determining the position of the Cre-induced bends and the order of strand exchange, but how does Cre distinguish between the scissile base pairs? We confirmed by DMS methylation that Lys-86 makes major groove contacts with the scissile G nucleotide in both loxP and lox4 as observed in several of the Cre-lox crystal structures (2325). We observed this contact even when only symmetry element b was present (data not shown), indicating that the Lys-86-scissile G interaction can occur within cI. In a recent crystal structure of the wild type Cre protein bound to a loxP-Holliday junction, Lys-86 of the cleaving Cre subunit contacts the scissile A at N7 and the adjacent scissile phosphate was activated for cleavage (27). However, Lys-86 of the non-cleaving Cre subunit did not contact the adjacent scissile G. Because resolution occurs preferentially adjacent to the scissile A (11, 31, 32), this structure may represent the conformation of the Cre-lox synaptic complex just prior to resolution, and this may differ from the initial cII or the synaptic complex containing two linear lox sites.
Mutation of Lys-86 to Ala significantly altered the position of the cI bend, shifting the bend center by 811 bp to position 8' in loxP and to position 4 in lox4 (Fig. 1, b and c, and Table II). The cI bends induced by Cre K86A in both loxP and lox4 were near the scissile AT base pair and were at the opposite half of the lox site relative to the cI bends induced by the wild type Cre protein. Mutation of Lys-86 to Ala did not significantly alter the position of the cI bend in the single symmetry element substrates se a and se b. We suggest that Lys-86 is not involved in actually bending the DNA, but is responsible for directing the Cre-induced cI bend and possibly the first Cre molecule toward the scissile GC base pair on a full lox site. The interaction between Lys-86 and the scissile G may help stabilize the cI in which the wild type Cre protein is bound adjacent to the scissile G.
Although important for positioning the cI bend, Lys-86 was not critical for establishing the cII bend in loxP (Table II). Despite the fact that the wild type and K86A Cre proteins bent loxP at opposite ends of spacer region in cI, they induced similar cII bends. This implies that, unlike wild type Cre, the first or predominant Cre K86A molecule to bind to the loxP site in cI does not necessarily become the cleaving subunit in cII and/or the synaptic complex. The similarities in the circular permutation and phasing analyses of the loxP cII bends induced by the wild type and K86A Cre proteins further complement the footprinting results. Like the wild type Cre protein, Cre K86A also increased the sensitivity of the spacer region on the bottom strand of loxP to DMS and OP-Cu modifications (Figs. 2 and S1). This could imply that the bottom strand is the incipient crossing strand in the wild type and K86A Cre-loxP complexes as discussed above (Fig. 7). The K86A mutation may not have dramatically altered the DNA conformation in cII but rather simply revealed the already exposed crossing strand, and this would account for the hypermethylation of the scissile G. Therefore, although the scissile base pairs are still critical for directing the cII bend in loxP, it appears that their interaction with Lys-86 is not essential. This is consistent with the fact that Lys-86 is not important for determining the strand preference in loxP during the first strand exchange event (32).
Although Lys-86 did not determine the cII bend in loxP,itdid contribute to the cII bend in lox4. Whereas the wild type Cre protein induced an asymmetric cII bend in lox4, the cII bend induced by the Cre K86A protein was more symmetrical. The symmetric K86A-lox4 cII bend is consistent with our previous observation that the K86A mutation abolished the strand bias for the initiation of strand exchange in lox4 (32). Therefore, Lys-86 may be responsible for establishing the asymmetric cII bend and the site of initial strand exchange in lox4.
In summary, the location of the scissile base pairs is important for dictating the asymmetric Cre-induced cI and cII bends in loxP and lox4 as well as the site of the first strand exchange event. Lys-86 is critical for directing the cI bend in loxP and lox4 toward the scissile GC base pairs as well as the position of the cII bend and the site of initiation in lox4. In contrast, the cII bend and the site of initiation in loxP are not dependent on Lys-86. Additional bases in the lox spacer region as well as other residues in Cre may also contribute to the Cre-induced DNA bending and the order of strand exchange.
![]() |
FOOTNOTES |
---|
The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains Supplemental Figs. S1S8.
Supported by Studentships from the MRC and CIHR and by a University of Toronto Open Fellowship.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 416-978-6061; Fax: 416-978-6885; E-mail: p.sadowski{at}utoronto.ca.
1 The abbreviations used are: cI, complex I; cII, complex II; DMS, dimethyl sulfate; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; OP-Cu, 1,10-phenanthroline-copper; Wt, wild type.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|