From the Department of Pathobiology and Purdue Cancer Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
Received for publication, September 26, 2002, and in revised form, November 18, 2002
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The intriguing process of free energy conversion,
ubiquitous in all living organisms, is manifested in ATP binding and
hydrolysis. ATPase activity has long been recognized to be a capability
limited to proteins. However, the presence of an astonishing variety of unknown RNA species in cells and the finding that RNA has catalytic activity have bred the notion that RNA might not be excluded from the
group of ATPases. All DNA-packaging motors of double-stranded DNA phages involve two nonstructural components with certain
characteristics typical of ATPases. In bacterial virus phi29, one of
these two components is an RNA (pRNA). Here we report that this pRNA is able to bind ATP. A comparison between the chemically selected ATP-binding RNA aptamer and the central region of pRNA reveals similarity in sequence and structure. The replacement of the central region of pRNA with the sequence from ATP-binding RNA aptamer produced
chimeric aptRNA that is able to both bind ATP and assemble infectious
viruses in the presence of ATP. RNA mutation studies revealed that
changing only one base essential for ATP binding caused both ATP
binding and viral assembly to cease, suggesting that the ATP binding
motif is the vital part of the pRNA that forms a hexamer to drive the
phi29 DNA-packaging motor. This is the first demonstration of a natural
RNA molecule that binds ATP and the first case to report the presence
of a SELEX-derived RNA aptamer in living organisms.
One common feature in the assembly of all linear double-stranded
(ds)1-DNA viruses including
herpes virus, pox virus, adenovirus, and all of the linear dsDNA phages
is that the lengthy viral genome is translocated with remarkable
velocity into a limited space within a preformed protein shell and
packaged into crystalline density (1-3). This energetically
unfavorable DNA motion process is accomplished by an ATP-driven motor
(4-7). Careful scrutiny of the well studied dsDNA viruses reveals a
striking commonality: all DNA-packaging motors involve two
nonstructural components with certain characteristics typical of
ATPases (8). For example, gpA and gpNuI of the DNA-packaging motors of
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-phage (9, 10) contain consensus ATP-binding domains and are
involved in ATP hydrolysis. Both gp16 and gp17, which constitute the
terminase of bacteriophage T4, are involved in ATP hydrolysis (11). In bacterial virus phi29, one of the nonstructural components for DNA
packaging is an RNA molecule called pRNA (Fig.
1) (12). One ATP is used to package two
base pairs of phage DNA of the phi29 (8) and the T3 system
(13).
View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Comparison of the central region of
pRNAwt with the ATP-binding RNA aptamer and construction of
chimeric pRNA/aptamer RNAs. Sequence comparison of the
central region of pRNAwt (a) with the 40-base
ATP-binding RNA aptamer, ATP-40-1 (b) (36). The similar
bases are highlighted. Gcon enlarged is a
conserved base essential for ATP binding. b and
c, chimeric aptRNAs were constructed by replacing the
central region of the phi29 pRNA with the sequence from the
aptamer.
The phi29-encoded 120-base pRNA binds the connector and leaves the DNA-filled capsid after completing the DNA-packaging task (14). Six pRNAs form a hexagonal complex to gear the DNA-translocating machinery (14-18). This DNA-packaging motor has been reported recently (19, 20) to be the strongest nanometer motor with a stalling force of >50 picoNewtons. It stuffs the viral procapsid with DNA at an initial speed of 100 base pairs/second under the extra load. The crystal structure of one of the important motor components, the connector where the pRNA binds, has been solved (6, 7). It has been reported that pRNA enhances the ATPase activity of gp16 (21, 22). It would be very intriguing to find out how the pRNA is involved in the transformation of chemical energy from ATP into motion and whether pRNA serves only as a stimulating factor or could interact with ATP directly.
The presence of an astonishing variety of unknown RNA species in cells and the finding that RNA has enzymatic activity (23, 24) have bred the notion that RNA might not be excluded from the group of ATPases that has long been believed to be only proteins. One method for the examination of this idea is the chemical approach using the in vitro selection-amplification technique (25, 54) to identify ATP-binding RNA dubbed aptamers (26) from synthesized random RNA pools.
Here we report that the central region of pRNA is similar to the
ATP-binding RNA aptamer (26) in sequence and structure. We also
demonstrate that phi29 pRNA directly binds ATP.
![]() |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Preparation of pRNA-- RNAs were prepared as described previously (27). DNA oligomers were synthesized with the desired sequences and used to produce dsDNA by PCR. The DNA products containing the T7 promoter were cloned into plasmids. RNA was synthesized with T7 RNA polymerase by run-off transcription and then purified from a polyacrylamide gel. The sequences of both plasmids and PCR products were confirmed by DNA sequencing.
In vitro Production of Infectious Virions of phi29 Virion Particles with aptRNA and ATP-- The purification of procapsids (28, 29), gp16 (30), and DNA-gp3 (31, 32); the preparation of the tail protein (gp9) (29), neck proteins (gp11, gp12) (29), and the morphogenetic factor (gp13) (29); and the procedure for the assembly of infectious phi29 virion in vitro (29) have been described previously. 1 µg of RNA in 1 µl RNase-free H2O was mixed with 10 µl of purified procapsids (0.4 mg/ml) and then dialyzed on a 0.025-µm-type VS filter membrane against TBE (2 mM EDTA, 89 mM Tris borate, pH 8.0) for 15 min at room temperature. The mixture was subsequently transferred for another dialysis against TMS (100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 50 mM Tris, pH 7.8) for an additional 30 min. The pRNA-enriched procapsids were then mixed with gp16, DNA-gp3, and ATP (1.4 mM final concentration except when otherwise indicated) to complete the DNA-packaging reaction. After 30 min, gp11, gp12, gp9, and gp13 were added to the DNA-packaging reactions to complete the assembly of infectious virions, which were assayed by standard plaque formation.
Inhibition of phi29 Assembly by ADP, AMP, and Adenosine-- Inhibition assays were performed with the highly sensitive in vitro phi29 assembly system described above with the exception that the final concentration of ATP was 0.25 mM. Reaction buffer containing 0.25 mM ATP in TMS was mixed with varied concentrations of ADP, AMP, and adenosine before being added to the in vitro phi29 assembly system and assayed for the formation of phi29 plaques.
ATP-binding Assay for pRNA with ATP-Agarose Affinity
Column--
A column that was 0.55 cm in diameter was packed with
affinity-agarose resin immobilized with 5 mM ATP (or higher
concentration) and attached through the C-8 position to cyanogen
bromide-activated agarose. Lyophilized resin was soaked in distilled
water for >30 min before column packing. After washing with 10 ml of
distilled water and then with 10 ml of binding buffer (300 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris, pH 7.6, 5 mM
MgCl2), 1 µg (2.5 × 105 µmol) of
3H-labeled RNA in 100 µl binding buffer was applied to
the ATP affinity column. The column was then washed with 3 ml of
binding buffer and eluted with the same buffer containing ATP or other nucleotides as indicated. Fractions were collected and subjected to
scintillation counting. A 116-base rRNA was used as a negative control.
Determination of Apparent Dissociation Constants for RNA·ATP Complex-- The Apparent Kds for RNA/ATP interaction were determined by two methods, isocratic elution (26, 34) and ATP gradient elution.
For isocratic elution, a column with a diameter of 0.55 cm was packed
with 2.8 ml of ATP C-8-agarose containing 5 mM ATP. After
washing the column with an excess amount of binding buffer, 2.5 × 105 µmol of [3H]pRNA or aptRNA in 100 µl of binding buffer was applied to the column. The RNAs were then
eluted with the same binding buffer.
For ATP gradient elution, a column 0.8 cm in diameter was packed with
0.8 ml ATP C-8-agarose immobilized with 5 mM ATP. 1 µg
(2.5 × 105 µmol) of [3H]pRNA in
100-µl binding buffer was applied to the column. After washing with 5 ml of binding buffer, RNA was eluted with a 2-ml step-up gradient with
increasing concentrations of ATP in the binding buffer.
ATPase Assay by Thin Layer Chromatography--
The purified
DNA-packaging components, gp16 (0.24 µg), DNA-gp3 (0.1 µg),
procapsid (3.2 µg), and RNA (1 µg), were mixed individually or in
combination with 0.3 mM of unlabeled ATP and 0.75 µCi
(6000 Ci/mmol) of [-32P]ATP in the reaction buffer
(30). When one or more components was omitted, the component(s) was
replaced with the same volume of TMS. After 30 min of incubation at
room temperature, 3 µl of the reaction mixture was spotted onto a
polyethyleneimine-cellulose plate (J. T. Chemical Co.) (8) and
air-dried. The plate was then soaked in methanol for 5 min, air-dried,
and then run in 1 M formic acid and 0.5 M
lithium chloride. Autoradiograms were produced with Cyclone Storage
PhosphorScreen (Packard Instrument Co.). At the same time, a parallel
experiment was conducted with the same components to test the results
of phi29 virion assembly. Only those assembly reactions with a yield
higher than 5 × 107 plaque-forming units/ml were
selected for ATPase assay.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Phi29 pRNA Was Able to Bind ATP--
To investigate whether pRNA
could interact with ATP directly, an ATP-agarose affinity column
containing 5 mM ATP (or higher concentration) was used to
detect the binding of pRNAwt, the shortest pRNA with wild
type pRNA phenotype, to ATP (Fig. 2A, I).
[3H]pRNAwt was applied to an ATP-affinity
column and washed with a large volume of binding buffer.
[3H]pRNAwt was eluted from the column when
0.04 mM ATP was added to the buffer, suggesting that
pRNAwt binds ATP specifically. When the 116-base
rRNA served as the negative control, no detectable RNA was eluted by as
high as 5 mM ATP buffer, thereby indicating that the
pRNA/ATP interaction was specific to pRNA. When the conserved base
Gcon, essential for ATP-binding (Fig. 1), was changed to a
C, the resulting mutant pRNAGconC could
not bind ATP (Table
I).
|
|
The Central Region of phi29 pRNA Is Very Similar to ATP-binding RNA Aptamer in Both Sequence and Predicted Secondary Structure-- A chemically selected aptamer RNA has been found to be able to bind ATP (Fig. 1) (26). The structural basis for this ATP-binding RNA aptamer has also been elucidated by multidimensional NMR spectroscopy (35-37). All ATP-binding aptamers contain a consensus sequence embedded in a common secondary structure (26, 35-37). The bases essential for ATP-binding have been identified previously (26, 37). The structure of the phi29 pRNA has been investigated extensively (for review see Ref. 38). We compared the structure of ATP-binding aptamers with phi29 pRNA and found that the aptamers are very similar to the central part of phi29 pRNA (Fig. 1).
Infectious Virus Was Produced in the Presence of the Chimeric
aptRNA Harboring the ATP-binding Motif--
To further confirm that an
ATP-binding motif is present in the pRNA molecule, the pRNA motif with
a potential for ATP binding was replaced with a sequence from
ATP-binding RNA aptamer, ATP-40-1 (26). When chimeric aptRNA was added
to the phi29 in vitro assembling mixture (29, 39),
~108 infectious virus particles (plaque-forming unit) per
milliliter were produced in the test tube (Table I) (Fig.
3). The omission of ATP or aptRNA or the
addition of RNase to the reaction mixture failed to generate a single
virus (Table I).
|
ATP Is Required for the Production of Infectious
Virus--
To establish that the activity of aptRNA is related to ATP,
virus assembly using aptRNA was performed with and without ATP. When
ATP was omitted from the reaction, not a single plaque was detected.
Virus assembly was also inhibited by the poorly hydrolyzable ATP
analogue -S-ATP, suggesting that the aptRNA-involved viral assembly
process is ATP-related (Table I).
Both pRNAwt and aptRNA Only Bound to ATP Resins with the Attachment Site at the C-8 Position-- Seven different affinity resins were tested for pRNAwt and aptRNA binding affinity to ATP. These resins vary in nucleotide composition and in location for nucleotide/agarose linkage. Our results show that both pRNAwt and aptRNA bound only to an agarose resin containing ATP in which no binding to the resin with ADP or adenosine-3',5'-diphosphate was detected. For ATP resin, both pRNAwt and aptRNA bound only to agarose resins with the attachment site at the C-8 position but not at N-6 or the hydroxyl position. These results suggest that both pRNAwt and aptRNA/ATP interaction require a specific three-dimensional configuration and that such a requirement is similar for both RNAs.
Both aptRNA and pRNAwt Had Higher Affinity for ATP Than
for ADP and AMP--
It has been reported that in the phi29
DNA-packaging system, ATP is hydrolyzed to ADP during packaging (8). It
would be interesting to know whether pRNAwt and aptRNA can
discriminate ATP from ADP. Both ATP (immobilized by ATP) and an ADP
affinity-agarose column (immobilized by ADP) were attached through the
C-8 position and used to compare relative binding affinity. It was
found that both pRNAwt and aptRNA had a higher affinity for
ATP than for ADP (Fig. 4).
|
Further investigation revealed that aptRNA had a higher affinity than
pRNAwt in ADP and AMP binding (Fig. 4). The binding affinity of aptRNA for ADP and AMP was very similar. The data partially
agree with previous publications showing that the ATP-binding RNA
aptamer binds ATP, ADP, AMP, and adenosine equally (26, 35, 40, 41).
Nevertheless, the binding affinity of aptRNA to ADP and AMP was lower
than that for ATP (Fig. 4). This suggests that the -phosphate was
involved in ATP binding in aptRNA but not in the ATP-binding RNA
aptamer (Fig. 7).
In Viral Assembly Assay, AMP and Adenosine Had Little Inhibition
Effect on pRNAwt but aptRNA Was Inhibited Strongly by AMP
and Adenosine--
As noted earlier, pRNAwt had higher
affinity for ATP than for AMP. However, it has been demonstrated
previously that the ATP-binding RNA aptamer could bind ATP, AMP, and
adenosine with similar affinity (26, 35, 37, 40-42). We showed that
the binding affinity of aptRNA is higher for ATP than for ADP and AMP
(Fig. 4). The result suggested that the structure of the RNA aptamer
motif remains basically unchanged in the context of the chimeric
aptRNA, whereas the global structures of aptRNA, pRNAwt,
and apt-binding RNA aptamer for holding ATP and AMP are not identical.
The 30 bases at the 5' end and the 52 bases at the 3' end obviously
have certain physical obstructive effects on general RNA/nucleotide
interaction, since the Apparent Kd for
ATPbound as determined by isocratic elution (26, 34) is 14 µM for ATP-binding RNA aptamer (26) while it is 100 µM (see below) for aptRNA. Moreover, the bases at the 5'
end and 3' end might help to promote the holding for the -phosphate,
because both pRNAwt and aptRNA had a higher affinity for
ATP than for ADP and AMP, whereas RNA aptamer bound ATP and AMP equally.
To test whether the ATP-binding aptamer in aptRNA is truly
functioning with an interchangeable ATP binding site and whether the
ATP binding is related to DNA-packaging and phi29 assembly function,
inhibition studies were conducted by adding ADP, AMP, and adenosine to
the phi29 assembly system with pRNAwt and aptRNA. Because
aptRNA contains an ATP-binding RNA aptamer that binds adenosine, AMP,
and ATP with similar affinity, if ATP-binding is related to biological
function, then aptRNA containing such an aptamer could be poisoned by
the addition of adenosine or AMP, whereas the
pRNAwt-packaging system should not be poisoned. The result
from phi29 assembly assays revealed that AMP and
adenosine inhibited aptRNA activity
strongly while the inhibition effect for
pRNAwt was not as strong
(Figs.
5-7).
|
|
|
Comparison of RNA Binding Affinity for ATP, CTP, GTP, and UTP-- To compare the binding affinity for ATP, CTP, GTP, and UTP, pRNAwt (Fig. 2C, I) or aptRNA (Fig. 2C, II) was first attached to the ATP-agarose gel. After washing with an excess amount of binding buffer, the bound RNA was then eluted by the buffers containing ATP, CTP, GTP, and UTP. It was found that ATP buffer could elute the bound aptRNA or pRNAwt effectively while GTP, CTP, and UTP buffer was much less efficient.
Determination of the Apparent Dissociation Constants for RNA·ATP Complex-- The Apparent Kds for RNA/ATP interaction were determined by isocratic elution (26, 34) and ATP gradient elution. The isocratic elution method was used to measure the Apparent Kd for ATP that immobilized on agarose (ATPbound) while the purpose of the ATP gradient elution was to measure the Apparent Kd for free ATP (ATPfree).
With the isocratic elution method (Fig.
8A), Apparent
Kd was determined with the equation: Apparent
Kd = [L] × (Vt V0)/(Ve
V0), where [L] is the concentration of ATP
immobilized on agarose, Vt is the volume of the
column, V0 is the void volume of the
column, and Ve is the volume needed to elute the RNA
(Fig. 8). The Apparent Kd for aptRNA and for
pRNAwt interacting with the ATPbound was
determined to be (0.1 ± 0.06) mM and (1.3 ± 0.8) mM, respectively. The Kd for
pRNAwt, which is more than ten times higher than that for
aptRNA, indicated that the affinity of pRNAwt for ATP is
much lower than that of aptRNA. Therefore, a resin immobilized with
higher ATP concentration (
5 mM) was needed to detect the
ATP/pRNA interaction through the ATP affinity-agarose method. If the
ATP concentration is lower than 5 mM, it is difficult to
detect the binding in the elution assay in Fig. 2.
|
For ATP gradient elution, ATPfree will compete with the ATPbound for binding to aptRNA or pRNAwt. To completely elute the pRNAwt bound to the column, the concentration of ATPfree must be close to the Apparent Kd. Otherwise, the ATPfree would not be able to snatch the RNA that had been attached to the ATPbound in the column. From the ATP gradient elution (Fig. 8B), it was found that most of the bound aptRNA and pRNAwt was eluted by 0.004 and 0.04 mM ATPfree, respectively. This suggests that the Apparent Kds for the complexes of aptRNA·ATPfree and pRNAwt·ATPfree are around 0.004 and 0.04 mM, respectively. The finding of a difference in Apparent Kd determined through these two methods is not surprising, because the C-8 linkage of ATP to agarose might hamper the RNA/ATP interaction that involves a three-dimensional contact. Furthermore, it is possible that only a certain fraction of ATPbound in the gel is accessible to aptRNA or pRNAwt.
Changing a Single Base Essential for ATP Binding Caused Both the ATP-binding and Viral Assembly Activities to Cease-- Nucleotide Gcon (Fig. 1) has been shown to be highly conserved in ATP-binding RNA aptamers, and it is the most critical nucleotide for ATP binding (26, 35). One G corresponding to Gcon of the aptRNA is also conserved in all of the pRNAs of five different bacteriophages (43, 44).
The mutation of Gcon to C resulted in a mutant aptRNAGconC (Fig. 1) that was not able to bind ATP (Fig. 2A, II). This mutant was also completely inactive in virion assembly (Table I), suggesting that the functions of ATP binding and virion assembly are correlated. When the Gcon mutation was introduced into the conserved Gcon of pRNAwt, the ATP-binding activity of the mutant pRNAGconC disappeared (Fig. 2A, I). This mutant was found to be incompetent in phi29 assembly (Table I). By structural analysis, in addition to competition and inhibition with binomial distribution analysis (15, 45), it was confirmed that the incompetence of such mutant aptRNA with regard to driving the motor is because of a change in chemistry rather than structure (data not shown).
Conformational Changes of pRNA Induced by ATP-- The conformation change of pRNAwt was investigated in the presence and absence of ATP. ATP caused a change in the pRNAwt migration rate in native gels (Fig. 6A). Purified pRNAwt was loaded onto a native gel with different concentrations of ATP. The pRNAwt was observed to migrate more slowly when ATP was present. The band with the slower migration rate was purified and shown to be fully active in DNA packaging. At the same time, the control Escherichia coli 5 S rRNA did not show any migration rate change attributed to the presence or absence of ATP (Fig. 6A).
We have reported that magnesium induces a conformational change of pRNA (46, 47). It is possible that the change of pRNA conformation was because of the depletion of ions by ATP. However, we have previously reported that pRNA formed oligomers with a slower migration rate in gel when magnesium is present (46, 47). The formation of a band with a slower migration rate in Fig. 6A suggests that in the presence of ATP, the conformation or oligomerization of pRNA is larger rather than smaller. This phenomenon argues against the possibility that the conformational change is simply the result of the depletion of ions by ATP. If that were true, the RNA would become smaller and run faster in the presence of ATP. The appearance of a broad band representing pRNA with a slower migration rate also suggests that more than one conformation of pRNA may be present.
ATP Was Hydrolyzed to ADP and Inorganic Phosphate in a Reaction
Mixture Containing pRNA--
Hydrolysis of [32P]ATP was
assayed by thin layer chromatography on a polyethyleneimine-cellulose
plate. Components involved in DNA packaging were mixed alone or in
combination with [32P]ATP. After an incubation period of
30 min, the reaction mixture was applied to the
polyethyleneimine-plate. Results from thin layer chromatography
revealed that the individual component alone exhibited almost
undetectable ATPase activity (Fig. 6B). However, ATP was
hydrolyzed to inorganic phosphate in the reaction along with all
DNA-packaging components including pRNA.
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Many RNA aptamers have been isolated and extensively investigated (25, 26, 41, 48-52), but these studies have remained very theoretical since none of these reported aptamers has been identified in RNA molecules in nature. This work demonstrated that the chemically selected ATP-binding RNA aptamer is similar to the central region of pRNA in sequence and structure. The replacement of the central region of pRNAwt with the sequence from the aptamer produced a chimeric aptRNA that was able to assemble infectious viruses in a test tube containing other purified phi29 structural components. RNA mutation studies revealed that the change of only one base essential for ATP binding caused the activities of ATP binding and viral assembly to cease, confirming that a structure similar to the ATP-binding RNA aptamer is present in bacterial virus phi29.
There are several similarities and differences among pRNAwt, aptRNA, and the ATP-binding RNA aptamer. The similarities include the following. 1) All of them bind ATP. 2) All of them prefer the ATP-resin with a C-8 linkage. 3) All of them have a higher affinity for ATP than for GTP, CTP, and UTP. 4) Both pRNAwt and aptRNA have a higher affinity for ATP than for ADP. 5) All of them contain a conserved Gcon at a similar position.
The differences include the following. 1) Both pRNAwt and
aptRNA have a higher affinity for ATP than for ADP and AMP, whereas the
RNA aptamer binds ATP, ADP, AMP, and adenosine equally (26). This is an
indication that the 5'- and 3'-extended bases of the aptRNA provide a
packet to hold the -phosphate of ATP. The preference for ATP over
ADP is explainable. Because ATP-binding is related to biological
activity, the pRNA must have the ability to trap ATP and to release ADP
after ATP hydrolysis. 2) The ATP-binding affinity of aptRNA is higher
than that of pRNAwt (Figs. 2 and 4). However, the specific
activity of aptRNA in phi29 assembly is lower than that of
pRNAwt (data not shown). Two possibilities might explain
this discrepancy. First, the binding of pRNAwt to the
connector is the rate-determining step in phi29 DNA packaging and
assembly. The change of the mutant is at the connector-binding domain.
This change might somehow alter its structure and thus hamper the
connector binding affinity. Second, although the chemically selected
ATP-binding aptamer is an excellent molecule for ATP binding, it might
not be after all the best candidate in nature for ATP hydrolysis if
such hydrolysis does occur. Too high a binding affinity to the
substrate does not signify a good biological component or enzyme,
because this component or enzyme will not be dissociated from its
substrate easily. Such dissociation might be critical for the turnover
in pRNAwt/ATP interaction in phi29 assembly.
Here we found that the putative ATP-binding site in pRNAwt
resides within a region interacting with the connector. The
significance for such ATP/pRNAwt binding remains to be
investigated. One possible implication is that ATP binding to
pRNAwt provides a special structure in the assembly of the
packaging machinery. Another possible implication is that alternative
binding and release of ATP from pRNAwt could induce a
conformational change of pRNAwt that in turn rotates the
connector and pRNA is part of the ATPase complex.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
---|
We thank Dr. Chaoping Chen for valuable communication and other contributions to this work, Stephen Hoeprich for the pRNA computer models, and Jane Kovach, for assistance in the preparation of the paper.
![]() |
FOOTNOTES |
---|
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM59944 and NSF, National Institutes of Health Grant MCB9723923.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Purdue Cancer Center,
Purdue University, B-36 Hansen Life Science Research Bldg., West
Lafayette, IN 47907. Tel.: 765-494-7561; Fax: 765-496-1795; E-Mail:
guop{at}purdue.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 26, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M209895200
![]() |
ABBREVIATIONS |
---|
The abbreviations used are: ds, double-stranded; gp, gene product; wt, wild type.
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
1. | Guo, P. (1994) Seminars in Virology 5, 1-3[CrossRef] |
2. | Earnshaw, W. C., and Casjens, S. R. (1980) Cell 21, 319-331[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
3. | Black, L. W. (1988) in The Bacteriophages (Calendar, R., ed) , Plenum Publishing Corp., New York |
4. | Bazinet, C., and King, J. (1985) Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 39, 109-129[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
5. | Jimenez, J., Santisteban, A., Carazo, J. M., and Carrascosa, J. L. (1986) Science 232, 1113-1115[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
6. | Simpson, A. A., Tao, Y., Leiman, P. G., Badasso, M. O., He, Y., Jardine, P. J., Olson, N. H., Morais, M. C., Grimes, S., Anderson, D. L., Baker, T. S., and Rossmann, M. G. (2000) Nature 408, 745-750[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
7. | Guasch, A., Pous, J., Ibarra, B., Gomis-Ruth, F. X., Valpuesta, J. M., Sousa, N., Carrascosa, J. L., and Coll, M. (2002) J. Mol. Biol. 315, 663-676[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
8. | Guo, P., Peterson, C., and Anderson, D. (1987) J. Mol. Biol. 197, 229-236[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
9. |
Parris, W.,
Davidson, A.,
Keeler, C. L., Jr.,
and Gold, M.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
8413-8419 |
10. | Hang, J. Q., Tack, B. F., and Feiss, M. (2000) J. Mol. Biol. 302, 777-795[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
11. | Rao, V. B., and Black, L. W. (1988) J. Mol. Biol. 200, 475-488[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
12. | Guo, P., Erickson, S., and Anderson, D. (1987) Science 236, 690-694[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
13. | Morita, M., Tasaka, M., and Fujisawa, H. (1993) Virology 193, 748-752[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
14. | Chen, C., and Guo, P. (1997) J. Virol. 71, 3864-3871[Abstract] |
15. | Trottier, M., and Guo, P. (1997) J. Virol. 71, 487-494[Abstract] |
16. | Guo, P., Zhang, C., Chen, C., Trottier, M., and Garver, K. (1998) Mol. Cell. 2, 149-155[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
17. | Zhang, F., Lemieux, S., Wu, X., St.-, Arnaud, S., McMurray, C. T., Major, F., and Anderson, D. (1998) Mol. Cell. 2, 141-147[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
18. | Hendrix, R. W. (1998) Cell 94, 147-150[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
19. |
Davenport, R. J.
(2001)
Science
291,
2071-2072 |
20. | Smith, D. E., Tans, S. J., Smith, S. B., Grimes, S., Anderson, D. L., and Bustamante, C. (2001) Nature 413, 748-752[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
21. | Grimes, S., and Anderson, D. (1990) Mol. Biol. 215, 559-566 |
22. |
Ibarra, B.,
Valpuesta, J. M.,
and Carrascosa, J. L.
(2001)
Nucleic Acids Res.
29,
4264-4273 |
23. | Cech, T. R., Zaug, A. J., and Grabowski, P. J. (1981) Cell 27, 487-496[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
24. | Guerrier-Takada, C., Gardiner, K., Marsh, T., Pace, N., and Altman, S. (1983) Cell 35, 849-857[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
25. | Ellington, A. D., and Szostak, J. W. (1990) Nature 346, 818-822[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
26. | Sassanfar, M., and Szostak, J. W. (1993) Nature 364, 550-553[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
27. | Zhang, C. L., Lee, C.-S., and Guo, P. (1994) Virology 201, 77-85[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
28. | Guo, P., Rajogopal, B., Anderson, D., Erickson, S., and Lee, C.-S. (1991) Virology 185, 395-400[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
29. | Lee, C. S., and Guo, P. (1995) J. Virol. 69, 5018-5023[Abstract] |
30. | Guo, P., Grimes, S., and Anderson, D. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 3505-3509[Abstract] |
31. | Anderson, D. L., Hickman, H. H., and Reilly, B. E. (1966) J. Bacteriol. 91, 2081-2089[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
32. | Mellado, R. P., Peñalva, M. A., Inciarte, M. R., and Salas, M. (1980) Virology 104, 84-96[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
33. |
Hoeprich, S.,
and Guo, P.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
20794-20803 |
34. | Arnold, F. H., Schofield, S. A., and Blanch, H. W. (1986) J. Chromatogr. 355, 1-12[CrossRef] |
35. | Dieckmann, T., Suzuki, E., Nakamura, G. K., and Feigon, J. (1996) RNA 2, 628-640[Abstract] |
36. | Cech, T. R., and Szewczak, A. A. (1996) RNA 2, 625-627[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
37. | Jiang, F., Kumar, R. A., Jones, R. A., and Patel, D. J. (1996) Nature 382, 183-186[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
38. | Guo, P. (2002) Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol. 72, 415-472[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
39. | Lee, C. S., and Guo, P. (1994) Virology 202, 1039-1042[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
40. | Nonin, S., Jiang, F., and Patel, D. J. (1997) J. Mol. Biol. 268, 359-374[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
41. | Dieckmann, T., Butcher, S. E., Sassanfar, M., Szostak, J. W., and Feigon, J. (1997) J. Mol. Biol. 273, 467-478[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
42. | Jiang, F., Patel, D. J., Zhang, X., Zhao, H., and Jones, R. A. (1997) J Biomol. NMR 9, 55-62[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
43. |
Bailey, S.,
Wichitwechkarn, J.,
Johnson, D.,
Reilly, B.,
Anderson, D.,
and Bodley, J. W.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
22365-22370 |
44. |
Chen, C.,
Zhang, C.,
and Guo, P.
(1999)
RNA
5,
805-818 |
45. | Chen, C., Trottier, M., and Guo, P. (1997) Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 36, 190-193 |
46. | Chen, C., and Guo, P. (1997) J. Virol. 71, 495-500[Abstract] |
47. |
Trottier, M.,
Mat-Arip, Y.,
Zhang, C.,
Chen, C.,
Sheng, S.,
Shao, Z.,
and Guo, P.
(2000)
RNA
6,
1-10 |
48. | Ciesiolka, j., Gorskl, J., and Yarus, M. (1995) RNA 1, 538-550[Abstract] |
49. | Klug, S. J., and Famulok, M. (1994) Mol. Biol. Rep. 20, 97-107[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
50. |
Burke, D. H.,
and Willis, J. H.
(1998)
RNA
4,
1165-1175 |
51. | Wang, C., Xu, F., Jin, Y. X., and Wang, D. B. (1999) Acta Biochem. Biophys. Sinica 31, 504-508 |
52. | Szkaradkiewicz, K., Nanninga, M., Nesper-Brock, M., Gerrits, M., Erdmann, V. A., and Sprinzl, M. (2002) FEBS Lett. 514, 90-95[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
53. |
Chen, C.,
Sheng, S.,
Shao, Z.,
and Guo, P.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
17510-17516 |
54. | Tuerk, G., and Gold, L. (1990) Science 249, 505-510[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |