Isolation and Characterization of a Novel GRAS Gene That Regulates Meiosis-associated Gene Expression*

Kengo Morohashi {ddagger}, Masayoshi Minami §, Hisabumi Takase §, Yasuo Hotta ¶ and Kazuyuki Hiratsuka {ddagger} ||

From the {ddagger}Division of Plant Biotechnology, Graduate school of Environment and Information Sciences, Yokohama National University, Yokohama 240-8501, §Graduate School of Biological Sciences, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma 630-0101, and Department of Health and Nutrition, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Shimami-cho, Niigata-shi 950-3198, Japan

Received for publication, February 19, 2003 , and in revised form, March 24, 2003.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
GRAS protein is a family of plant-specific proteins that plays a role in various developmental processes. Here we report a novel GRAS protein from lily, designated LlSCL (Lilium longiflorum Scarecrow-like), dominantly expressed at the premeiotic phase within anthers. The LlSCL protein has two highly basic regions, and transient expression analyses of dissected GFP-LlSCL fusion proteins showed that both basic regions are important for the nuclear localization. A series of transcriptional activation experiments of truncated LlSCL proteins fused to the yeast GAL4 DNA-binding domain clearly demonstrated that the amino terminus of the LlSCL protein has a strong activity of transcriptional activation in the yeast as well as in the plant cell. Further investigation on the effect of the LlSCL protein on the transcriptional activity of the meiosis-associated promoter revealed that in pollen mother cells of the lily, the activity of the meiosis-associated promoter is specifically enhanced by LlSCL protein co-expression. These results suggest that LlSCL is involved in transcriptional regulation during microsporogenesis within the lily anther.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
All sexually reproducing organisms have a specialized developmental pathway for gametogenesis, in which diploid cells undergo meiosis to produce haploid germ cells. In plant male gametogenesis, archesporial cells differentiate into pollen mother cells (PMCs),1 and the PMCs give rise to the productions of tetrads of four haploid germ cells with two nuclear divisions. Subsequently, the haploid germ cells develop into mature pollen through the cytological and molecular events involved in the pollen developmental pathway. Meiosis organizes the transition from diploid to haploid and thus is one of the most complex events to occur during gametogenesis. The complexity of events suggests that many genes are tightly regulated to ensure each successful meiotic division. In yeast, characterization of temporal and spatial gene expression at meiosis has contributed toward a greater understanding of the mechanism of the meiotic gene (1). In higher eukaryotes, however, only a limited number of meiotic genes have been reported because of the lack of appropriate analytical techniques. The monocotyledonous plant Lilium longiflorum has been used for decades to study meiosis because of the accessibility of the male gametophyte (microsporocytes and pollen grains) and the synchronous development among sporogenous cells within an anther (2, 3). By using the subtractive method, Kobayashi et al. (4) isolated 18 cDNAs (LIM1–LIM18 genes), which are preferentially expressed during the premeiotic phase of microsporogenesis in L. longiflorum. LIM15 gene, which shows a similarity to the DNA recombination gene RecA, has been shown to be involved in meiosis in plants (5, 6). These results suggest that genes induced at meiosis have a function associated with meiotic events. However, mechanisms involved in meiosis-specific gene expression are not necessarily clear, and factors that regulate gene expression specific to microsporogenesis have not been identified yet. In the view of gene expression at microsporogenesis, identification of the factors that regulate specific gene expression should provide important clues to elucidate mechanisms involved in meiotic events in higher plants.

In an attempt to obtain information for genes expressed during microsporogenesis and meiosis, we previously carried out a large scale sequencing project using a lily zygotene cDNA library (7). One of the sequenced clones, M1125, has homology with a plant-specific putative transcription factor, Scarecrow (SCR). SCR is required for asymmetric cell division in an Arabidopsis root and encodes a novel putative transcription factor (8). Recently, SCR-like genes were reported in various plant species such as maize and pea (9, 10). SCR-like gene functions are not restricted to the asymmetric cell division. Although Repressor of Ga1–3 (RGA) and gibberellin-insensitive (GAI) genes show a similarity to SCR in their amino acid sequences, they play important roles in the gibberellin signal transduction of Arabidopsis but not in asymmetric cell division (11, 12). In addition, PAT1 protein, which shows a similarity to SCR protein, has been shown to be involved in the phytochrome A signal transduction of Arabidopsis (13). In other species, various functions of SCR-like genes were reported; the Lateral suppressor (Ls) gene in tomato has crucial functions in the formation of lateral branches, and SLR1 of rice has been identified as an ortholog of GAI (14, 15). Pysh and co-workers (16) identified a number of Arabidopsis ESTs (expressed sequence tags) that showed a similarity to SCR amino acid sequence and designated them Scarecrow-like (SCL). They indicated that SCL genes comprised a novel gene family, referred to as the GRAS gene family. The GRAS gene products have conserved carboxyl termini, but the amino termini are structurally diverse. It has been suggested that the diversity of amino termini would be related to their functions, but no detailed studies on functional analysis have been carried out. Although the SCR product is predicted to be a transcriptional regulator on the basis of structural similarities to transcriptional regulatory proteins (8), direct evidence for the GRAS gene product as a transcriptional regulator has not been reported. It was shown that chimeric SLR1/OsGAI proteins fused to the yeast GAL4 DNA-binding domain enhanced UAS promoter activity (17, 18), but the target sequence for the GRAS protein has not been reported. Here, we describe the isolation and characterization of a novel GRAS gene from lily microsporocytes and show that the GRAS gene product is able to activate the transcription of meiosis-associated gene by transient expression assay.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Plant Materials—Flower buds of L. longiflorum cv. Hinomoto were categorized according to their length, which was calculated from the base of the pedicel to the tip of the sepals (ranging from 10 to 35 mm). Estimation of the stages of the microsporogenesis was based on the correlation between bud length and the determination of meiotic stage by cytological examination according to published methods (2). Anthers were isolated from the dissected buds. Leaves were collected from fresh lilies. All materials were soaked in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 °C.

DNA Sequencing—DNA sequencing was performed using a Perkin-Elmer dye primer cycle system according to the manufacturer's instructions with a ABI 373 Stretch sequencer (Applied Biosystems Inc.). Homology searches were performed in the GenBankTM data base using the BLAST program (19).

RNA Isolation and Gel Blot Analysis—RNA was prepared from samples kept at -80 °C using the aurintricarboxylic acid method as described previously (20). Each lane was loaded with 10 µg of total RNA, which was then fractionated on 1% agarose-formaldehyde gels and blotted onto Hybond N+ membrane according to the manufacture's protocol (Amersham Biosciences). Hybridization of 32P-labeled DNA probes to RNA blots was performed in 50% formamide, 5% SDS, and 5x SSC. The filters were prehybridized for 2 h and hybridized overnight at 42 °C. The RNA blots were washed for 20 min in 2x SSC, 1% SDS at 42, 50, and 60 °C, briefly air-dried, and then autoradiographed with X-AR films (Fuji film).

5'-Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends (5'-RACE)—Total RNA was extracted from buds at the pachytene stage of lily PMCs by using an RNeasy Plant kit (Qiagen), and treated with RNase-free DNase (Amersham Biosciences). 5'-RACE was performed with the 5'-RACE system for Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends kit (Invitrogen) using the following primers: 1125GSP1, 5'-GACGGTCATCTATAGC-3'; 1125A, 5'-TAGCCACTGTTTGGGCACAATGG-3'; and 1125B, 5'-GAGTTCTAAGGTCCACCACCTCAG-3'.

Reporter Gene Constructions and Transient Expression of the GFP-LlSCL Fusion Protein in Onion Epidermal Cells—For green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusions, the {beta}-glucuronidase coding region from pBI221 was replaced by the GFP coding region of plasmid pEGFP-C1 (Clontech). DNA fragments coding for the entire or partial regions of LlSCL were amplified using the following primers with KOD-plus polymerase (Toyobo): pGLlSCL-N, LlSCL-NE (5'-GGGAATTCGGTGAAAGAGCTAAAAGTAG-3'), and LlSCL-NC (5'-CCCTCGAGTGGACAGAGCAGAACAAGATC-3') (linker site is underlined); pGLlSCL-C, LlSCL-C' (5'-GGAGATCTGCAACCAGAAGTCCTCAGAATGG-3'), and 1125-C (5'-GGCTCGAGTCATCGACTATTGGGTG); pGLlSCL-CdL, LlSCL-CdL (5'-GGAGATCTGCCTACGGGCTCTATATGTCGG-3'), and 1125-C; pGLlSCL-CdV, LlSCL-CdV (5'-CCAGATCTCCACAGCCAGGTTTCCGCCC-3'), and 1125-C; pGLlSCL-CdBII, LlSCL-C', and 1125-SQ4 (5'-ATAACATTCATAGCATCCCGCCCG-3'). These PCR DNAs were digested with the appropriate enzymes and cloned into pBI221-GFP vectors. All GFP-LlSCL fusion derivatives (pGLlSCL-N, pGLlSCL-C, pGLlSCL-CdL, pGLlSCL-CdV, and pGLlSCL-CdBII) encode fusion proteins with GFP at the amino-terminal portion and with LlSCL at the carboxyl-terminal portion. Onion epidermal cells were prepared and bombarded with 1.6 µm gold particles (Bio-Rad PDS-1000/He) coated with the control plasmid DNA. Samples were kept at room temperature for 8 h, and the GFP localization was visualized using a fluorescent microscope E800 (Nikon) equipped with a color charge-coupled device camera system (CCD, Hamamatsu Photonics).

Transcriptional Activation Experiments in Plant Cells—For transcriptional activation through the GAL4 target sequence, we used the firefly luciferase gene reporter plasmid containing six copies of the GAL4 target sequence fused to the -46 region of the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter. For the construction of the effector plasmids, the PCR-amplified LlSCL fragments were fused to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain and inserted into the pBI221 vector by replacing the {beta}-glucuronidase coding sequence: p221DBLlSCL-FL, LlSCL-5'Bam (5'-GGGGATCCATGGTGAAAGAGCTAAAAGTAGACG-3'), and 1125-C (linker site is underlined); p221DBLlSCL-N, LlSCL-5'Bam and LlSCL-N/STOP (5'-CCCTCGAGCTATGGACAGAGCAGAACAAGATC-3'); p221DBLlSCL-C, LlSCL-C'Met (5'-GGGGATCCATGGCAACCAGAAGTCCTCAGAATGG-3'), and 1125-C; p221DBLlSCL-CdL, LlSCL-CdL, and 1125-C; p221DBLlSCL-CdV, LlSCL-CdV and 1125-C; p221DBLlSCL-N(1–129), LlSCL-5'Bam, and LlSCL587-STP (5'-GGCTCGAGCTAAGATGGCTGGTCAGATGGAG-3'); p221DBLlSCL-N(130–202), LlSCL587-Met (5'-GGGGATCCATGTACAACAATCCTAGTCCGG-3'), and LlSCL806-STP (5'-CCCTCGAGCTATGTGGGCTCTCCCAATCCTTC-3'); p221DBLlSCL-N(203–317), LlSCL806-Met (5'-GGGGATCCATGACTAACATTGAAGCTCGTG-3'), and LlSCL-N/STOP; p221DBLlSCL-N(1–202), LlSCL-5'Bam, and LlSCL806-STP; p221DBLlSCL-N(130–317), LlSCL587-Met, and LlSCL-N/STOP. The yeast GAL4 activation domain was amplified from pGADT7 (Clontech) with the following primers: AD5-Bg (5'-GGAGATCTGCCAATTTTAATCAAAGTGGG-3') and AD3-Xh (5'-GGCTCGAGCTACTCTTTTTTTGGGTTTGGTGGGG-3'). These PCR-amplified DNAs were digested with appropriate enzymes and cloned into the pBI221-GAL4DB vector containing a GAL4 DNA-binding domain. For the transactivation assay of LlSCL protein in plant cells, the LlSCL-FL fragment was amplified with LlSCL-5'Bam and 1125-C primers and then inserted into SacI-blunt/BamHI-digested pBI221 by replacing the {beta}-glucuronidase coding sequence. A reporter plasmid harboring a tissue-specific promoter, pLIM10prom::221::LUC+, was constructed as described previously (21).2 The BY-2 cells, the lily leaves, and PMCs were incubated at room temperature for 12 and 24 h in the dark, respectively. Dual luciferase assay was conducted as described previously (22).

Yeast Expression Vectors, Transformation, and {beta}-Galactosidase Assay—To construct a yeast expression vector, the PCR-amplified LlSCL fragments and yeast activation domain were inserted into the pGBKT7 vector (Clontech). Constructs used in this experiments were pGB, pGBAD, pGBLlSCL-N, pGBLlSCL-N(1–129), pGBLlSCL-N(130–202), pGBLlSCL-N(203–317), pGBLlSCL-N(1–202), and pGBLlSCL-N(130–317). Transformation of budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae was carried out by the lithium acetate method. The strain used was AH109 (MATa, trp1–901, leu2–3, 112, ura3–52, his3–200, gal4{Delta}, gal80{Delta}, LYS2::GAL1UAS-GAL1TATA-HIS3, GAL2UAS-GAL2TATA-ADE2, URA3::MEL1UAS-MEL1TATA-lacZ, MEL1). The {beta}-galactosidase liquid assay was performed with a luminescent {beta}-galactosidase detection kit II according to the manufacturer's instructions (Clontech).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Isolation of a GRAS Gene cDNA from Lily Microsporocytes—We have selected and sequenced ~400 cDNA clones from a cDNA library of lily PMCs by the self-hybridization method as described previously (7). One of these cDNA clones, designated M1125, is closely related in amino acid sequence to the SCR gene, which encodes a putative transcription factor that regulates an asymmetric cell division in the Arabidopsis root (8). By using the 5'-RACE technique, we isolated a 2.6-kb full-length cDNA of the M1125 from the total RNA at the pachytene stage of lily PMCs. The full-length cDNA contains an open reading frame with a coding capacity for 740 amino acids (Fig. 1). Comparison of the 740-amino acid sequence with the previously described proteins showed a similarity to the GAI, RGA, and SCR proteins belonging to the GRAS protein family. Comparison of the M1125 protein, designated LlSCL (Lilium longiflorum SCARECROW-Like), with other GRAS gene products revealed the presence of highly conserved VHIID, PFYRE, and SAW motifs within the carboxyl terminus of the protein (Fig. 2). Two leucine heptad repeats, referred to as LHRI and LHRII, are also identified in the carboxyl terminus (amino acids 369–413 and 537–603, respectively). In the middle (amino acids 365–369) of the LlSCL protein, the LXXLL motif, which has been shown to mediate the binding of transcriptional coactivators to nuclear receptors (23, 24), was also identified. Although no typical nuclear localization signal (NLS) was found within the LlSCL amino acid sequence, two parts of the highly basic region, referred to as BRI and BRII, were identified (amino acids 351–359 and 697–704, respectively). The amino terminus of the LlSCL protein does not show any significant homology to known proteins (Fig. 1).



View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
Nucleotide sequence and the deduced amino acid sequence of LlSCL cDNA. The amino acid sequence encoded by an open reading frame is shown below the nucleotide sequence. Basic amino acid regions are boxed, acidic amino acids are circled, and serine stretches are underlined.

 


View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
Comparison of LlSCL with GRAS gene family. Gaps have been introduced to maximize the alignment, and identical and similar amino acids are highlighted in black and gray boxes, respectively. The VHIID domain is indicated by a bold underline. The double underline shows leucine heptad repeats, and asterisks identify residues that define leucine heptad repeats. Conserved residues of the PFRYE motif and the SAW motif are indicated by open and closed circles, respectively.

 

LlSCL Gene Is Strongly Expressed at the Premeiotic Phase—To characterize the expression pattern of the LlSCL gene, we conducted RNA gel blot analysis. Fig. 2 shows the results obtained by probing a blot of total RNA prepared from whole anthers collected at various stages of anther development with the radiolabeled 5'-region of the LlSCL gene. A 2.6-kb LlSCL transcript was found to be differentially regulated during the course of microsporogenesis. The maximal level of LlSCL mRNA was detected in anthers containing sporogenous cells before meiosis. During the meiosis of microsporogenesis, the transcript was detected in a slightly lower level throughout microspore development, and then it decreased to an undetectable level in mature pollen (Fig. 3). In vegetative tissues, LlSCL gene expression levels were barely detectable (data not shown).



View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
LlSCL gene expression. 10 µg of total RNA isolated from anthers at different stages of development were hybridized with the cDNA probe of 5'-region of the LlSCL gene. Total RNAs were extracted from anthers at the premeiotic phase (PM), leptotene stage (Le), zygotene stage (Zy), pachytene stage (Pa), and diplotene-diakinesis stages (D/D), tetrads (Te), and anthers predominantly from the uninuclear pollen grain (UP) and from mature pollen (MP). The ethidium bromide (EtBr) staining pattern of rRNAs is indicated to ensure equal loading of the lanes.

 

Nuclear Localization of LlSCL Protein—SCR and related proteins have been suggested to be involved in the transcriptional regulation (8). Thus, they are thought to have nuclear localizing activity. In fact, a previous report indicated that RGA-GFP fusion proteins are located in the nucleus of the onion epidermal cell (11). To investigate the intracellular localization of LlSCL protein, chimeric genes encoding the LlSCL protein fused to the GFP were introduced into onion epidermal cells using a particle bombardment system and expressed under control of the CaMV 35S promoter (Fig. 4). Eight hours after bombardment, green fluorescence derived from GFP fusion proteins were examined by fluorescent microscopy.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
Diagram of constructs deleted for subcellular localization analysis of GFP-fused LlSCL protein. Each domain (BRI and BRII, LXXLL motif, leucine heptad repeats I and II (LHRI and LHRII), and VHIID) is indicated by a different pattern of shading. The deleted LlSCL mutants were fused with the GFP coding sequence at the amino termini of the dissected LlSCL protein. The numbers refer to positions of the residues at the deletion points.

 

The fluorescent signals derived from the control plasmid vector expressing GFP alone were observed in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus of onion epidermal cells (Fig. 5A). Likewise, the GFP signals from cells transfected with pGLlSCL-CdV and pGLlSCL-CdL constructs were preferentially observed in the cytoplasm (Fig. 5, D and E, respectively). The GFP-LlSCL-N fusion proteins strongly aggregated in cytoplasm (Fig. 5G). Although GFP signals of the pGLlSCL-CdBI construct were observed in both the nucleus and cytoplasm, the signals in the nucleus were stronger than those in cytoplasm (Fig. 5C). On the contrary, the signals from the pGLlSCL-C were located exclusively in the nucleus (Fig. 5B). Interestingly, the signals from the construct pGLlSCL-CdBII were observed in the cytoplasm, even though the pGLlSCL-CdBII construct expressed a fusion protein including the BRI region (Fig. 5F). These results indicate that both BRI (amino acids 351–359) and BRII (amino acids 697–704) are important for the nuclear localization of LlSCL protein. It is necessary to confirm the requirement of basic regions in the context of full-length protein; however, we could not carry out a mutational analysis using full-length protein because of our inability to detect fluorescent signals from samples transfected with pGLlSCL-FL.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.
Subcellular localizations of deleted LlSCL proteins in onion epidermal cells. The mutant proteins shown in Fig. 4 were transiently expressed in onion epidermal cells. A, GFP; B, GFP-LlSCL-C; C, GFP-LlSCL-CdBI; D, GFP-LlSCL-CdL; E, GFP-LlSCL-CdV; F, GFP-LlSCL-CdBII; G, GFP-LlSCL-N. Bars = 100 µm.

 

The LlSCL Protein Contains a Transcriptional Activation Domain—To evaluate the function of the LlSCL protein as a transcription factor, we performed transcriptional activation experiments by transient assay in tobacco BY-2 cells. The reporter gene was the firefly (Photinus pyralis) luciferase gene preceded by a promoter containing six repeats of the GAL4 target sequence (UAS) fused to the CaMV 35S promoter TATA-box region. The effector genes were designed to express fusions of various parts of the LlSCL protein with the DNA-binding domain (DB) of yeast GAL4. The activation domain (AD) of yeast GAL4 protein was used as a positive control. The plasmid constructs used and the results are shown in Fig. 6. The full-size LlSCL protein fused to GAL4-DB, DB-FL, was able to raise the activation level the UAS promoter ~2.5-fold higher than the activation level of GAL4-DB alone. However, three truncated LlSCL proteins, LlSCL-C, LlSCL-CdL, and LlSCL-CdV, fused to GAL4-DB did not activate the UAS promoter. On the other hand, the amino-terminal portion of the LlSCL protein fused to GAL4-DB strongly activated the UAS promoter. The transcriptional activation levels of GAL4-DB-LlSCL fusion protein derivatives containing the amino-terminal region were equivalent to the level of the GAL4-AD. These results suggest that the amino terminus of the LlSCL protein possesses the capability of strong transcriptional activation.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.
Identification of transcriptional activation domain of LlSCL in tobacco BY-2 cells. The upper panel indicates the reporter construct. The luciferase gene was placed downstream of six copies of the GAL4-binding site. The lower panel shows the effector constructs containing DNA sequence encoding the GAL4 DNA-binding domain and distinct regions of LlSCL proteins. Each motif is described below the lower panel. The numbers refer to the positions of residues at the ends of the LlSCL regions fused to GAL4-DB. Both reporter plasmid and effector plasmid were transiently expressed in tobacco BY-2 cells with a reference plasmid. The following were used as the effector plasmids: DB, p221DB; DB::AD, p221DBAD; DB::FL, p221DBLlSCL-FL; DB::N, p221DBLlSCL-N; DB::C, p221DBLlSCL-C; DB::CdL, p221DBLlSCL-CdL; DB::CdV, p221DBLlSCL-CdV. Relative luciferase activities in triplicate samples are shown after normalization with Renilla luciferase activity from the reference plasmid. Error bars show standard deviations.

 

The amino terminus of LlSCL protein has two acidic regions. The domain responsible for transcriptional activation often belongs to the sequence that is rich in acidic residues (25, 26). Therefore, we dissected the amino-terminal region of LlSCL protein to investigate the activities of transcriptional activation with respect to these acidic regions. As shown in Fig. 7, DB-N(1–129), which includes the first acidic domain (amino acids 4–110), showed strong transcriptional activation equivalent to that of DB-N(1–317). The neutral domain fused to GAL4-DB, DB-N(130–202), had up to 3-fold higher activity than GAL4-DB alone. On the other hand, DB-N(203–317) and DB-N(130–317) showed no transcriptional activity, even though both constructs included the second acidic domain. Interestingly, the highest activity was obtained by the expression of DB-N(1–202) harboring the first acidic domain and the neutral domain. These results suggest that the region containing the first acidic domain and the neutral domain but not the second acidic domain of LlSCL protein is responsible for the transcriptional activation.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7.
Transcriptional activation of the amino terminus of LlSCL in tobacco BY-2 cells. The upper panel indicates the reporter construct. The luciferase gene was placed downstream of six copies of the GAL4-binding site. The lower panel shows the effector constructs containing DNA sequence encoding the GAL4 DNA-binding domain and distinct regions of LlSCL proteins. The D/E-rich region is indicated by a black box. The numbers refer to the positions of residues at the ends of the LlSCL regions fused to GAL4-DB. Both reporter plasmid and effector plasmid were transiently expressed in tobacco BY-2 cells with a reference plasmid. The following were used as effector plasmids: DB, p221DB; DB::AD, p221DBAD; DB:N(1–317), p221DBLlSCL-N; DB::N(1–129), p221DBLlSCL-N(1–129); DB::N(130–202), p221DBLlSCL-N(130–202); DB::N(203–317), p221DBLlSCL-N(203–317); DB::N(1–202), p221DBLlSCL-N(1–202); DB::N(130–317), p221DBLlSCL-N(130–317). Relative luciferase activities in triplicate samples are shown after normalization with Renilla luciferase activity from the reference plasmid. Error bars show standard deviations.

 

The Amino Terminus of LlSCL Protein Functions as a Transcriptional Activator in Yeast Cells—To investigate whether the LlSCL protein activates transcription through a plant-specific mechanism, we also examined the activity of transcriptional activation of LlSCL protein in yeast cells. We constructed various plasmids expressing the GAL4 DNA-binding domain fusions of different regions of LlSCL protein in yeast. These plasmids were introduced into yeast cells carrying the lacZ reporter gene under the control of the GAL1 promoter. (Fig. 8). The results of the {beta}-galactosidase assay indicated that the properties of transcription activation of LlSCL protein in yeast cells were the same as those in plant cells. The region covering the first acidic domain and the neutral domain of the amino terminus of LlSCL protein caused transcriptional activation in the yeast as well as in the plant cell. Interestingly, the transcriptional activation levels of the GAL4-DB fusion proteins containing the LlSCL acidic domain were higher than that of GAL4-DB-AD fusion in yeast cells. These results suggest that plant-specific factors are not required for the strong activity of transcriptional activation of LlSCL acidic domain.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8.
Functional analysis of the activation domain of LlSCL protein in yeast cells. Yeast expression vectors contained DNA fragments encoding distinct LlSCL were transformed into yeast cells. The plasmids used were following: DB, pGB; DB::AD, pGBAD; DB::N(1–317), pGBLlSCL-N; DB::N(1–129), pGBLlSCL-N(1–129); DB::N(130–202), pGBLlSCL-N(130–202); DB::N(203–317), pGBLlSCL-N(203–317); DB::N(1–202), pGBLlSCL-N(1–202); DB::N(130–317), pGBLlSCL-N(130–317). The average {beta}-galactosidase activity obtained from triplicate samples is shown after normalization with optical density at 600 nm. Relative {beta}-galactosidase activity was indicated by the ratio to DB. Error bars show standard deviations.

 

LlSCL Protein Is a Transcriptional Activator of the Meiosis-associated Gene in PMCs—To study whether the LlSCL gene functions as a transcriptional activator at microsporogenesis, we investigated the effect of the full-length LlSCL protein expression on the transcriptional activity of the meiosis-associated promoter that directs microsporogenesis-specific gene expression. We exploited a meiosis-associated gene, LIM10, which encodes a small molecular weight heat shock protein specifically induced at the meiotic prophase (zygotene) in lily PMCs. To measure the transcriptional activation of the meiosis-associated promoter, the firefly luciferase coding region was placed downstream of the LIM10 promoter sequence.3 The full-length LlSCL cDNA preceded by the CaMV 35S promoter was used as the effector gene. The activity of the CaMV 35S promoter was higher than the meiosis-associated promoter in tobacco BY-2 cells and lily leaves, whereas the higher activity of the meiosis-associated promoter was detected in lily PMCs (Fig. 9). When the LlSCL protein was co-expressed together with reporter genes, the activity of CaMV 35S promoter was slightly decreased in all plant cells tested. Similarly, the activity of the meiosis-associated promoter was slightly decreased by co-expression with LlSCL in tobacco BY-2 cells and lily leaves. In PMCs, the activity of the meiosis-associated promoter was enhanced by LlSCL co-expression, whereas the activity of CaMV 35S promoter was down-regulated (Fig. 9). These results suggest that the LlSCL protein plays a role in the transcriptional activation of the meiosis-associated (LIM10) promoter during meiosis in conjunction with PMC-specific factor(s).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 9.
Transcriptional activation of the meiosis-associated gene by transient expression of LlSCL protein. A, diagrams of the reporter plasmids and effector plasmid used in this experiments. B–D, effector, reporter, and reference plasmids were co-transformed into tobacco BY-2 cells (B), lily leaves (C), and lily PMCs (D) by particle bombardment. Relative luciferase activity is shown in more than three samples after normalization with Renilla luciferase activity from the reference plasmid. Error bars show standard errors (B and C, n = 3; D, n = 6).

 


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
A Novel Gene Encoding a Nuclear GRAS Protein Is Expressed at Microsporogenesis—In this study, we isolated and characterized a novel GRAS gene, LlSCL (L. longiflorum Scarecrow-like), expressed specifically in premeiotic phase within the anthers of L. longiflorum. Because the SCR has been predicted to be a transcriptional regulator, we speculated that the LlSCL gene encodes a novel transcriptional regulator involved in microsporogenesis. The molecular dissection experiments indicated that both the first and second basic regions (BRI and BRII) of the LlSCL protein are important for the nuclear localization. Although the NLSs within plant transcription factors vary in sequence, organization, and number, it is noteworthy that the NLS of the LlSCL protein separates the two regions by 400 residues. This kind of distant NLSs has not been reported in previously described transcription factors including GRAS gene products (27). The amino acid sequence of the BRI domain of LlSCL protein shares homology with the basic region in the SCR protein, but domain identical to BRII of the LlSCL protein was not found in the SCR protein. In addition, no homology was found between the putative NLS of the RGA protein and BRI or BRII of LlSCL protein (11). On the other hand, the PAT1 protein has been shown to contain no putative NLS, and the protein is distributed throughout the cytoplasm (13). These data suggest the presence of various functions and mechanisms involving intracellular localization of GRAS gene products.

Amino Terminus of LlSCL Protein Has a Strong Transcriptional Activity—Although the GRAS gene products share highly conserved motifs located within the carboxyl terminus, the amino termini were variable (16). The variable structures of the amino termini of GRAS gene products would be related to their functions. In fact, the DELLA domain, which is positioned in the amino termini of the RGA, GAI, RGL1, and SLR1 proteins, is required for the specific functions of those proteins in the gibberellin response (11, 18, 28). On the contrary, the SCR protein, which has a function distinct from other GRAS proteins, does not contain any DELLA domains in the amino terminus. The LlSCL protein does not contain any DELLA domains and shows no similarity to the amino terminus of SCR protein. Therefore, it is speculated that the LlSCL gene would have specific functions distinct from the gibberellin response and from asymmetric cell division in the root.

Except for the DELLA domain, the molecular functions of the amino terminus of GRAS gene products have not been reported. In this study, however, we have demonstrated that the amino terminus of LlSCL protein (amino acids 1–317) is able to direct transcriptional activation equivalent to the level of the activation domain of yeast GAL4 protein. It is well known that hydrophobic residues interspersed between the acidic residues are associated with the transcriptional activation (26). This is consistent with the fact that the amino terminus of LlSCL (amino acids 1–317) is highly acidic with a net negative charge of 32. The amino terminus of LlSCL protein can be further divided into three domains: first acidic domain, neutral domain, and second acidic domain. Figs. 7 and 8 clearly indicate that both the first acidic and neutral domains, but not the second acidic domain, show strong activity. The transcriptional activation of both domains was observed not only in plant cells but also in yeast cells. This indicates that the mechanism of transcriptional activation by the amino terminus of LlSCL protein is evolutionarily conserved.

Silverstone et al. (11) proposed a model for gibberellin signal transduction through O-GlcNAc modification at serine/threonine-rich region(s) of GAI/RGA proteins. Because the LlSCL protein also contains serine stretches within the first acidic and neutral domains, it may be possible that the serine stretches could be O-GlcNAc modified by unknown factors in tobacco BY-2 cells and yeast cells, modulating the levels of transcriptional activation.

Compared with the high activity of transcriptional activation of the amino terminus of LlSCL protein, the full-length LlSCL protein exhibited lower activity (Fig. 6). The carboxyl terminus region of the LlSCL includes two parts, a leucine heptad repeat and an LXXLL motif, both of which mediate protein-protein interaction. Thus, it is possible that the LlSCL protein interacts with factors involved in the regulation of transcription via these protein domains that modulate the level of transcriptional activation.

Richards et al. (29) proposed that GRAS gene products were related to the STAT family of proteins based on structural similarities between GRAS and STAT family proteins. Because STATs are activated by the receptor kinase (30), the LlSCL protein could also be phosphorylated by an unknown protein kinase for a suitable function. Because the O-GlcNAc modification and serine/threonine phosphorylation are broadly observed in eukaryotic cells (31), it will be interesting to analyze the properties of mutated LlSCL proteins with amino acid substitutions within the serine stretch region.

LlSCL Protein May Play a Role in Transcriptional Regulation during Microsporogenesis—By the experiments of transient expression of the full-length LlSCL protein in plant cells, we found that the LlSCL protein may activate the expression of the meiosis-associated gene in lily PMCs (Fig. 9). To our knowledge, this is the first report indicating that the GRAS gene product is directly involved in regulation of a specific gene expression. Together with the result of mRNA accumulation pattern, we report here for the first time that a GRAS gene is involved in the specific gene expression during microsporogenesis. The results obtained in this study indicated that the LlSCL protein requires a specific factor(s) for specific activation in PMCs, because the LlSCL protein did not elevate the activities of LIM10 promoter in BY-2 and leaves. Thus, the LlSCL protein functions as a co-activator for activating a gene expression with the specific factor(s). To elucidate the mechanisms involved in LlSCL-mediated gene expression, it is necessary to isolate the specific factor(s) that activate LIM10 gene expression in concert with the LlSCL protein.

Further studies will be needed to define the biological functions and biochemical properties of LlSCL protein in the microsporogenesis and anther development in lily. However, because of our inability to conduct a molecular genetics approach, studies using a lily system are rather limited. The GRAS gene, which shows a high similarity to LlSCL gene, would have a similar function in the anthers from various species. Recently, we identified a gene encoding the LlSCL homolog from Arabidopsis and rice.4 The availability of LlSCL homologs from these species would allow further study of the function and biological implication of the LlSCL gene.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AB106274.

* This work was supported by Grant-in-aid 14360205 for Scientific Research (B) from the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science, by Research for the Future Program JSPS-RFTF 00L01604, and by Grant-in-aid 12052217 for Scientific Research on Priority Areas from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed: Division of Plant Biotechnology, Graduate School of Environment and Information Sciences, Yokohama National University, Yokohama 240-8501, Japan. Tel.: 81-45-339-4413; Fax: 81-45-339-4413; E-mail: hiratsk{at}ynu.ac.jp.

1 The abbreviations used are: PMC, pollen mother cell; UAS, upstream activating sequence; 5'-RACE, 5'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends; GFP, green fluorescent protein; CaMV, cauliflower mosaic virus; NLS, nuclear localization signal; BR, basic region; DB, DNA-binding domain; AD, activation domain; STAT, signal transducers and activators of transcription. Back

2 H. Takase, M. Minami, Y. Hotta, and K. Hiratsuka, unpublished. Back

3 M. Minami, H. Takase, and K. Hiratsuka, manuscript in preparation. Back

4 K. Morohashi, H. Takase, and K. Hiratsuka, unpublished data. Back



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Chu, S., DeRisi, J., Eisen, M., Mulholland, J., Botstein, D., Brown, P. O., and Herskowitz, I. (1998) Science 282, 699–705[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Erickson, R. O. (1948) Am. J. Bot. 35, 729–739
  3. Hotta, Y., Tabata, S., Stubbs, L., and Stern, H. (1985) Cell 40, 785–793[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Kobayashi, T., Kobayashi, E., Sato, S., Hotta, Y., Miyajima, N., Tanaka, A., and Tabata, S. (1994) DNA Res. 1, 15–26[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Terasawa, M., Shinohara, A., Hotta, Y., Ogawa, H., and Ogawa, T. (1995) Genes Dev. 9, 925–934[Abstract]
  6. Couteau, F., Belzile, F., Horlow, C., Grandjean, O., Vezon, D., and Doutriaux, M.-P. (1999) Plant Cell 11, 1623–1634[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Morohashi, K., Takase, H., Hotta, Y., and Hiratsuka, K. (2000) Plant Biotechnol. 17, 131–135
  8. Di Laurenzio, L., Wysocka-Diller, J., Malamy, J. E., Pysh, L., Helariutta, Y., Freshour, G., Hahn, M. G., Feldmann, K. A., and Benfey, P. N. (1996) Cell 86, 423–433[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Lim, J., Helariutta, Y., Specht, C. D., Jung, J., Sims, L., Bruce, W. B., Diehn, S., and Benfey, P. N. (2000) Plant Cell 12, 1307–1318[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Sassa, N., Matsushita, Y., Nakamura, T., and Nyunoya, H. (2001) Plant Cell Physiol. 42, 385–394[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Silverstone, A. L., Ciampaglio, C. N., and Sun, T.-P. (1998) Plant Cell 10, 155–169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Peng, J. P., Carol, P., Richards, D. E., King, K. E., Cowling, R. J., Murphy, G. P., and Harberd, N. P. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 3194–3205[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Bolle, C., Konez, C., and Chua, N.-H. (2000) Genes Dev. 14, 1269–1278[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Schumacher, K., Schmitt, T., Rossberg, M., Schmitz, G., and Theres, K. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 290–295[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Ikeda, A., Ueguchi-Tanaka, M., Sonoda, Y., Kitano, H., Koshioka, M., Futsuhara, Y., Matsuoka, M., and Yamaguchi, J. (2001) Plant Cell 13, 999–1010[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Pysh, L. D., Wysocka-Diller, J. W., Camilleri, C., Bouchez, D., and Benfey, P. N. (1999) Plant J. 18, 111–119[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Ogawa, M., Kusano, T., Katsumi, M., and Sano, H. (2000) Gene 245, 21–29[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Itoh, H., Ueguchi-Tanaka, M., Sato, Y., Ashikari, M., and Matsuoka, M., (2002) Plant Cell 14, 57–70[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., and Lipman, D. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Mousavi, A., Hiratsuka, R., Takase, H., Hiratsuka, K., and Hotta, Y. (1999) Plant Cell Physiol. 40, 406–416[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Uefuji, H., Minami, M., Takase, H., and Hiratsuka, K. (2001) Plant Biotechnol. 18, 151–156
  22. Matsuo, N., Minami, M., Maeda, T., and Hiratsuka, K. (2001) Plant Biotechnol. 18, 71–75
  23. Heery, D. M., Kalkhoven, E., Hoare, S., and Parker, M. G. (1997) Nature 387, 733–736[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Leo, C., and Chen, J. D. (2000) Gene 245, 1–11[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Giniger, E., and Ptashne, M. (1987) Nature 330, 670–672[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Triezenberg, S. J. (1995) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 5, 190–196[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Liu, L., White, M. J., and MacRae, T. H. (1999) Eur. J. Biochem. 262, 247–257[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Wen, C.-K., and Chang, C. (2002) Plant Cell 14, 87–100[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Richards, D. E., Peng, J., and Harberd, N. P. (2000) BioEssays 22, 573–577[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Darnell, J. E., Jr. (1997) Science 277, 1630–1635[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Hart, G. W. (1997) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 66, 315–335[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This Article
Abstract
Full Text (PDF)
All Versions of this Article:
278/23/20865    most recent
M301712200v1
Purchase Article
View Shopping Cart
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Citation Map
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Copyright Permissions
Google Scholar
Articles by Morohashi, K.
Articles by Hiratsuka, K.
Articles citing this Article
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Morohashi, K.
Articles by Hiratsuka, K.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.