Platelet-activating Factor Acetylhydrolase, and Not Paraoxonase-1, Is the Oxidized Phospholipid Hydrolase of High Density Lipoprotein Particles*

Gopal K. MaratheDagger §, Guy A. ZimmermanDagger §, and Thomas M. McIntyreDagger §||

From the Dagger  Human Molecular Biology and Genetics and Departments of § Medicine and  Experimental Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112-5330

Received for publication, October 30, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Paraoxonase-1 (PON1), an high density lipoprotein (HDL)-associated organophosphate triesterase, suppresses atherosclerosis in an unknown way. Purified PON1 protects lipoprotein particles from oxidative modification and hydrolyzes pro-atherogenic oxidized phospholipids and the inflammatory mediator platelet-activating factor (PAF). We find human PON1 acted as a phospholipase A2 but not as a phospholipase C or D through cleavage of phosphodiester bonds as expected. PON1 requires divalent cations, but EDTA did not block the phospholipase A2 activity of PON1. In contrast, a serine esterase inhibitor abolished phospholipase activity even though PON1 has no active-site serine residues. PAF acetylhydrolase, an oxidized phospholipid phospholipase A2, is a serine esterase associated with specific HDL particles. Western blotting did not reveal detectable amounts of PAF acetylhydrolase in PON1 preparations, although very low amounts of PAF acetylhydrolase might still account for PON1 phospholipase A2 activity. We revised the standard PON1 purification by first depleting HDL of PAF acetylhydrolase to find PON1 purified in this way no longer hydrolyzed oxidized phospholipids or PAF. Serum from a donor with an inactivating mutation in the PAF acetylhydrolase gene did not hydrolyze oxidized phospholipids or PAF, yet displayed full paraoxonase activity. We conclude that PAF acetylhydrolase is the sole phospholipase A2 of HDL and that PON1 has no phospholipase activity toward PAF or pro-atherogenic oxidized phospholipids.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Paraoxonase-1 (PON1)1 catalyzes the hydrolysis of organophosphorous triesters and aryl carboxyl esters; it is of interest because of its hydrolysis of paraoxon (a metabolite of the insecticide parathion) and neurotoxins such as sarin and diisopropylfluorophosphate. Insects and birds, in contrast to mammals, lack this activity, rendering them sensitive to various organophosphates (1). Hydrolysis of these substrates by PON1 is Ca2+-dependent, and the enzyme is extraordinarily sensitive to EDTA (2); for instance EDTA used as an anti-coagulant destabilizes and irreversibly inactivates the enzyme (3). PON1 is of interest for a second reason documented in a broad range of literature (4-13) that associates PON1 with a suppression of atherogenesis. For example, mice lacking PON1 are more susceptible to organophosphate toxicity and are also more susceptible to atherosclerosis when fed a high fat diet (7). Additionally PON1 has two common phenotypes that affect catalysis with certain substrates, and one phenotype correlates with a propensity toward vascular disease (14). Additionally, there are polymorphisms that affect circulating PON1 levels (15) that may alter the propensity to develop vascular disease.

Despite the association of PON1 with less vascular disease, two essential components in defining a biologic role for PON1 remain mysterious. The biologic substrate of PON1 is unknown, because it did not evolve to detoxify organophosphorous pesticides and neurotoxins and, at least in part because of the uncertainty over its substrates, the way by which PON1 lessens atherogenesis is also unknown. The search for a mechanistic role for PON1 reveals that it acts as an antioxidant (11) and has peroxidase activity (6). However, the antioxidant activity of PON1 is independent of its esterase activity (16), is at variance with its aryl esterase activity in isoforms arising from genetic polymorphisms (11, 16), and is unaffected by either heat or EDTA treatment that destroy aryl esterase activity (16). PON1 has a single unpaired cysteine residue that mutagenesis shows has no role in catalysis or stability (17), but this residue is absolutely essential for the antioxidant effect of PON1 (10, 18). The possibility that PON1 has two active sites that separately catalyze its esterase and antioxidant activities has been raised (11).

Oxidized lipoprotein particles contain pro-inflammatory lipid mediators that include ones that functionally mimic the potent phospholipid mediator platelet-activating factor (PAF) (19). PAF initiates physiologic inflammation and is active at picomolar levels. PAF is recognized by a single molecularly characterized receptor found on a number of cells that comprise the innate immune system (20). High affinity recognition of PAF by the PAF receptor depends on an sn-1 ether bond, the short acetyl sn-2 residue, and the choline head group of this phospholipid mediator. Oxidation of sn-2 polyunsaturated fatty acyl residues of ether phosphatidylcholines, as occurs during oxidation of lipoprotein particles, generates phospholipid products with shortened sn-2 residues that are inflammatory agents (21) because they are PAF receptor agonists (22, 23). The oxidative formation of PAF-like lipids results from an unregulated chemical reaction, in contrast to the tight regulation of PAF synthesis (24), and this process occurs in atherosclerotic lesions (25) and in the circulation after exposure to cigarette smoke (26, 27).

Oxidatively fragmented phospholipids, like PAF, are substrates for PAF acetylhydrolase (28, 29), a phospholipase A2 that only hydrolyzes phospholipids with sn-2 residues that are short or contain an oxy function introduced during oxidative fragmentation. This enzyme is a serine esterase with the signature catalytic triad (30), and so is sensitive to serine esterase inhibitors but not divalent ion chelators. PAF acetylhydrolase circulates in association with LDL and HDL particles and can migrate between them in a pH-dependent fashion (31).

PON1 is reported to hydrolyze PAF (32) and oxidatively fragmented phospholipids (5, 9, 12, 13), suggesting a potential mechanism that could account for the vascular protective effect of PON1. The existence of two distinct enzymes in the same lipoprotein particle apparently catalyzing the same reaction has yet to be tested directly. Here, we show that trace amounts of PAF acetylhydrolase contaminate PON1 preparations and that PON1 lacking PAF acetylhydrolase displays no phospholipase activity.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cibacron blue 3GA-agarose (type 3000-CL), DEAE-Sepharose 6B, concanavalin A-Sepharose 4B, deoxycholate, methyl-alpha -D-mannopyranoside, IGEPAL CA-630, potassium bromide, phenyl acetate, phospholipase A2 (bee venom), phospholipase C (Bacillus cereus), and phospholipase D (cabbage) were from Sigma, and Extracti-gel was from Pierce. Octadecylsilica cartridges, aminopropyl columns, and high pressure liquid chromatography grade solvents were from JT Baker Inc. (Phillipsburg, NJ), and Pefabloc was from Pentapharm AG (Basel, Switzerland). Human serum albumin was the product of Baxter Healthcare Corp. (Glendale, CA), whereas Hank's balanced salt solution was from BioWhittaker (Walkersville, MD). PAF, carbamyl-PAF, 2-O-methyl PAF, and the PAF receptor antagonist BN52021 were from BioMol Research Laboratories, Inc. (Plymouth Meeting, PA). Fura-2/AM was from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). ECL kits were from Amersham Biosciences, and polyclonal anti-PAF acetylhydrolase antiserum and cognate blocking peptide were from Cayman Chemical Co. (Ann Arbor, MI). Recombinant human PAF acetylhydrolase was from ICOS Corp. (Bothell, WA). [3H]PAF (10 Ci/mmol) was the product of American Radiolabeled Chemicals, Inc. (St. Louis, MO). PAF acetylhydrolase-deficient plasma (0.078 units of PAF acetylhydrolase/ml versus 1.5 units/ml from a healthy control) was a kind gift from Drs. Kei Satoh and Tada-atsu Imaizumi (Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Japan). We prepared oxidized phospholipids from low density lipoprotein isolated from normolipidic subjects as described (22, 23).

PON1 was purified from healthy human volunteers essentially as described by Gan et al. (33) with minor modifications. Human blood was collected in heparin, and plasma was generated from this and then calcified with CaCl2 to a final concentration of 1 mM before the resulting fibrin clot was separated by centrifugation. In few experiments the plasma pH was adjusted to either to pH 6.0 or to pH 9.0 with 1 N HCl or NaOH prior to an overnight incubation. These plasma samples (9 ml) were adjusted to a density of 1.3 with potassium bromide and then layered with 27 ml of saline in a centrifuge tube prior to ultracentrifugation for 3 h at 150,000 × g to separate HDL and LDL. HDL particles enriched with PON1 were mixed with Cibacron blue 3GA-agarose in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0), and loosely bound proteins were removed with 4 M NaCl buffer. PON1 bound to the Cibacron blue was then eluted with 0.1% deoxycholate and mixed with either DEAE-biogel or DEAE-Sepharose 6B in 0.1% IGEPAL CA-630 (rather than Nonidet P-40) before PON1 with was eluted with a linear gradient of NaCl (0.0-0.5 M) in 0.1% IGEPAL CA-630. DEAE fractions containing aryl esterase activity were diluted and rechromatographed on a DEAE-Sepharose 6B column. The final purification step used a concanavalin A-Sepharose column, and material from this step was concentrated with a Centricon apparatus. We resolved the proteins in the various fractions by 12% SDS-PAGE. PON1 was made detergent-free by passing it over Extracti-gel when the products of its reaction(s) were to be analyzed in a bioassay.

Aryl esterase activity of PON1 was determined spectrophotometrically using phenyl acetate as the substrate (2). The assay contained 1 mM phenyl acetate, 20 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0), and 1 mM CaCl2. Blanks without enzyme were used to correct for spontaneous hydrolysis. Activity was calculated from the molar extinction coefficient at 270 nm (using differences in the absorbance of phenol versus phenyl acetate) of 1310 M-1 cm-1. One unit of aryl esterase activity was defined as a micromole of phenyl acetate hydrolyzed per min.

We measured PAF acetylhydrolase activity using [3H]acetate-PAF as described by Stafforini et al. (31, 34) and also by bioassay. For this, human neutrophils were isolated by dextran sedimentation and centrifugation over Ficoll as before (35). Neutrophils (2.25 × 106/ml) were labeled with Fura-2/AM as before (23), and changes in intracellular calcium concentration were measured by dual excitation at 340 and 380 nm with emission collected at 510 nm. The amount of PAF stated in the figures (typically at 10-10 M) was pretreated with detergent-free PON1 or recombinant PAF acetylhydrolase for the specified time at 37 °C before the entire reaction was tested in the Ca2+ mobilization assay. We find as little as 5 to 10 ng of PAF acetylhydrolase in 15 min abolishes the calcium signal generated by 0.1 nM PAF. In some experiments, purified PON1 was pretreated for 1 h at 37 °C with either EDTA (100 µM) or the serine esterase inhibitor Pefabloc (100 µM) prior to assay. In some experiments PAF or 2-O-methyl PAF were treated with 10 µg of bee venom phospholipase A2 (in 0.5% human serum albumin in Hank's balanced salt solution with 10 mM Ca2+), 10 units of phospholipase C (B. cereus), or 10 units of phospholipase D (cabbage) for 2 h at 37 °C and then tested in the Ca2+-flux bioassay. The analysis of Ca2+ flux in PMN was as described (23, 36).

We probed for PAF acetylhydrolase by immunoblotting after electrophoretic separation by SDS-PAGE. The resolved proteins were transferred to an Immobilon-P membrane (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA) and probed with PAF acetylhydrolase polyclonal antibody (diluted 1:1000). A standard of truncated, non-glycosylated (the form approved for clinical trials) recombinant PAF acetylhydrolase was examined in a separate lane of the gel. Peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody was the secondary antibody (diluted 1:10000) with enhanced chemiluminescence reagent used for visualization. In some experiments, the primary anti-PAF acetylhydrolase antibody was pre-incubated with 200 µg per blot of the cognate blocking peptide.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Standard Preparations of Human PON1 Hydrolyze PAF and the Oxidized Phospholipids of Oxidized LDL-- We purified PON1 as described (2, 33) and assayed its hydrolysis of PAF or the PAF-like phospholipids produced during LDL oxidation (19, 22, 23). We chose a bioassay to examine hydrolysis because inactivation of these lipid mediators is the important outcome, and because the extreme potency of these mediators makes assays other than biologic ones impractical. Here we loaded freshly isolated human PMN with the Ca2+-sensitive dye Fura-2 and followed increases in intracellular Ca2+ by increases in the fluorescent ratio of the dye. We found that PMN were maximally stimulated by 10-10 M synthetic PAF (Fig. 1A) and by the PAF-like phospholipids created during LDL oxidation (Fig. 1B). PAF receptor antagonists abolished both responses (not shown) (23). Pre-incubation of either PAF (Fig. 1C) or the oxidized phospholipids isolated from oxidized LDL (Fig. 1D) with purified PON1 abolished the ability of these lipids to simulate PMN. Heat inactivation of PON-1 (Fig. 1E) destroyed the effectiveness of the preparation in degrading PAF. The positive control, recombinant PAF acetylhydrolase destroyed the biologic activity of PAF as expected (Fig. 1F). PON1 therefore displays the reported (5, 32) anti-inflammatory activity and inactivates PAF and PAF-like phospholipids generated during LDL oxidation.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Purified human PON1 and recombinant PAF acetylhydrolase inactivate PAF and PAF-like oxidized phospholipids. Freshly isolated human PMN were loaded with the Ca2+-sensitive dye Fura-2, and increases in intracellular Ca2+ levels were analyzed through the 340/380-nm emission ratio. The cells were treated (closed arrow) with PAF (A) or oxidized phospholipids extracted from oxidized LDL (B). Pre-treating PAF (C) or oxidized phospholipids (D) with PON1 (20 units), but not heat-inactivated PON1 (E), or recombinant PAF acetylhydrolase (F) for 2 h inactivated the agonist and prevented the stimulated increase in intracellular Ca2+. The effect of PON1 or PAF acetylhydrolase was on the added substrate and not on the Fura-2 PMN reporter cells, because the subsequent addition of 0.1 nM PAF to the cells evoked a full response (open arrows).

Phospholipid Hydrolysis by PON1 Preparations Occurs at the sn-2 Position-- PON1 is a phosphotriesterase (37) and might be expected to inactive phospholipid mediators by hydrolysis of the phosphodiester bonds of the phosphocholine head group. That is, its enzymatic mechanism would suggest that it functions as either a phospholipase C or phospholipase D. We tested this postulate in the following way. The PAF receptor is stimulated by PAF (Fig. 2A) but also by an sn-2 ether analog of PAF, 2-O-methyl PAF. This analog cannot be hydrolyzed at the sn-2 position by esterases, yet remains susceptible to the actions of phospholipases C and D. We first showed that phospholipase D (Fig. 2B) and phospholipase C (Fig. 2C) were just as effective as recombinant PAF acetylhydrolase, phospholipase A2, and PON1 (Fig. 2, D-F) in hydrolyzing and inactivating PAF. We performed a parallel experiment with 2-O-methyl PAF to find that it was an active agonist (Fig. 2G) and that phospholipase D (Fig. 2H) and phospholipase C (Fig. 2I) effectively inactivated this PAF analog. We found as expected that neither recombinant PAF acetylhydrolase (Fig. 2J) nor phospholipase A2 (Fig. 2K) hydrolyzed and inactivated this phospholipid. However, we also found that purified PON1 did not inactivate this PAF analog (Fig. 2L). Additionally, we found that a second non-hydrolyzable PAF analog, 2-carbamoyl-PAF, also was impervious to treatment with PON1 (not shown). The inference from this series of experiments is that PON1 functions as an sn-2-directed esterase and does not attack phosphodiester bonds to inactivate PAF or related phospholipids.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Purified human PON1 displays phospholipase A2 but not phospholipase C or D activity. A, PAF induces a Ca2+ flux in PMN that is destroyed by phospholipase D (PLD; B), phospholipase C (PLC; C), recombinant PAF acetylhydrolase (rPAFAH; D), phospholipase A2 (PLA2; E), and purified human PON1 (F). In contrast, the Ca2+ flux induced by 2-O-methyl-PAF (2-O-Me-PAF; G), a PAF analog with a non-hydrolyzable sn-2 methyl function, is inactivated by phospholipase D (H) and phospholipase C (I), but not by PAF acetylhydrolase (J), phospholipase A2 (K), or PON1 (L).

Hydrolysis of PAF by Purified PON1 Requires an Activated Serine Residue-- PON1 is an EDTA-sensitive phosphotriesterase, yet the above data showed it to function as an sn-2-directed esterase. We therefore determined whether the serine esterase inhibitor Pefabloc, which reacts with activated serine residues of enzymes such as phospholipases A2 and PAF acetylhydrolase, would suppress PON1 phospholipid hydrolysis. We found that Pefabloc effectively suppressed hydrolysis and inactivation of PAF by PON1 (Fig. 3C). In contrast, EDTA, which completely destabilizes and inactivates PON1 (2, 37), had no effect on PAF hydrolysis by PON1 preparations (Fig. 3D). As a control for the effectiveness of EDTA, we measured the aryl esterase activity of PON1. We found that the pattern of EDTA and Pefabloc effects on this activity of PON1 was the complete reverse of that for PAF hydrolysis; EDTA destroyed PON1 aryl esterase activity, whereas Pefabloc was without effect on this reaction (Fig. 3E).


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   The serine esterase inhibitor Pefabloc, but not EDTA, inhibits PAF hydrolysis by PON1. PAF (10-10 M) was treated with purified human PON1 (25-35 units) or PON1 pretreated with 100 µM of the serine esterase inhibitor Pefabloc or 100 µM EDTA for 60 min. The effect of PAF (A) or PAF treated with PON1 (B), PAF treated with Pefabloc-inhibited PON1 (C), or PAF after incubation with EDTA-treated PON1 on FURA2-loaded PMN (D) was determined as in Fig. 1. E, the effect of Pefabloc or EDTA on the aryl esterase activity of PON1 was determined as stated under "Materials and Methods." F, Western blot for PAF acetylhydrolase in PON1-containing fractions eluting from the Cibacron blue-agarose (cibacron), second DEAE-Sepharose (DEAE), or concanavalin A-Sepharose (Con-A) columns. Each lane contained 75-100 µg of protein.

This outcome was unexpected should the anti-atherogenic effect of PON1 reside in its hydrolysis of PAF and oxidized phospholipids. We considered the possibility that PAF acetylhydrolase, which is also a constituent of certain HDL particles (31), might contaminate PON1 preparations. We tested for the presence of PAF acetylhydrolase in PON1 preparations of increasing purity by Western blotting. We found (Fig. 3F) that PON1 fractions isolated from Cibacron columns (which very effectively bind PAF acetylhydrolase (34, 38)) still contained detectable amounts of immunoreactive PAF acetylhydrolase. Fractions eluting from the DEAE column containing PON1 still showed significant amounts of PAF acetylhydrolase contamination, whereas the final concanavalin A step of the PON1 purification scheme suppressed PAF acetylhydrolase contamination as reported (2, 6). What we cannot be sure of, however, is to what extent Western blotting detects PAF acetylhydrolase contamination at levels sufficient to confer phospholipase A2 activity to purified PON1.

PAF Hydrolytic Activity, but Not PON1, Migrates from HDL to LDL in a pH-sensitive Fashion-- PAF acetylhydrolase has been reported to be difficult to separate from PON1 (2, 6), and both are components of HDL particles. PAF acetylhydrolase is also associated with LDL particles, and its distribution between these lipoprotein species is modulated by pH. We determined whether the distribution of PON1 aryl esterase activity among lipoprotein particles was affected by pH in parallel with shifts in PAF hydrolytic activity. The data in Fig. 4 show that aryl esterase activity is exclusively found in fractions corresponding to HDL particles at either acidic (Fig. 4A) or basic pH (Fig. 4B). In contrast PAF hydrolysis is largely found at a density corresponding to HDL under acidic conditions, whereas under basic conditions the preponderance of PAF hydrolytic activity is found at the density of LDL. This shift of PAF hydrolytic activity corresponds to the distribution of immunoreactive PAF acetylhydrolase protein (Fig 4C), as expected (31).


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   PAF acetylhydrolase and PAF hydrolytic activity, but not PON1, redistribute between LDL and HDL fractions in a pH-dependent fashion. Distribution of PAF acetylhydrolase (solid lines) or aryl esterase (dashed lines) activity in a density gradient after an overnight incubation at an acidic (A) or basic (B) pH as described under "Materials and Methods" is shown. LDL elutes in fractions 18 to 25, whereas HDL is recovered in fractions 6 to 12. C, immunoblot of PAF acetylhydrolase of the stated amount of recombinant human PAF acetylhydrolase or LDL and HDL fractions (100 µg) recovered from the density gradient in the above panels. Glycosylated plasma PAF acetylhydrolase migrates as a mixture of molecular weights and migrates more slowly than truncated, unglycosylated recombinant PAF acetylhydrolase.

Detection of PAF Acetylhydrolase by Immunoblotting Is Not Sufficiently Sensitive to Detect PAF Acetylhydrolase Contamination-- We noted from the Western blot in Fig. 4C that we could detect 100 ng of the recombinant PAF acetylhydrolase standard but could not reliably detect 10 ng of the enzyme. PAF acetylhydrolase at levels less than 10 ng would therefore be undetectable by immunoblotting and might be an invisible contaminant of PON1 prepared from HDL, a source of both activities. We determined the minimum amount of PAF acetylhydrolase that would be sufficient to inactivate PAF in the Ca2+ flux bioassay by testing a graded amount of recombinant enzyme on the 0.1 nM PAF we use as an agonist in these assays. We found (Fig. 5A) that 800 pg or 1 ng of PAF acetylhydrolase did not diminish the effectiveness of PAF in the bioassay but that 5 ng of the enzyme noticeably reduced the amount of available PAF. We also found that 10 ng completely suppressed the PAF-induced Ca2+ response of PMN. We also varied the amount of PAF acetylhydrolase in a radiometric assay of [3H]acetyl-PAF hydrolysis and confirmed that 10 ng of the recombinant enzyme is sufficient to inactivate half of the added substrate (Fig. 5B) in just 15 min. Assays of PON1 inactivation of oxidized phospholipids may extend for many hours (5), so trace amounts of PAF acetylhydrolase may be problematic.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   The amount of PAF acetylhydrolase sufficient to rapidly inactivate PAF is less than can be detected by Western blotting. A, PAF (10-10 M) was treated with the stated concentration of recombinant PAF acetylhydrolase and then assayed as a Ca2+-mobilizing agonist for FURA-2-loaded PMN as in Fig. 1. B, [3H]PAF hydrolysis as a function of PAF acetylhydrolase concentration. Hydrolysis of [3H]PAF in 15 min by the stated amount of PAF acetylhydrolase was determined as stated under "Materials and Methods."

PON1 Can Be Separated from PAF Acetylhydrolase-- We purified PON1 to apparent homogeneity (Fig. 6A) and a final aryl esterase specific activity of 238-400 units/mg. We noted that different preparations of PON1 expressed a variable ratio of PAF hydrolysis to aryl esterase activity (not shown), an observation consistent with PAF acetylhydrolase co-purifying with PON1 (2, 6). We reasoned that if we started the purification of PON1 from a source that contained less PAF acetylhydrolase, that at a minimum we would garner evidence for PAF acetylhydrolase contamination of purified PON1 or that we may succeed in completely separating PAF acetylhydrolase from PON1. We pre-incubated plasma overnight at an alkaline pH to deplete PAF acetylhydrolase content of HDL, isolated this HDL, and used this as a starting source for PON1 purification. We examined fractions obtained from neutral plasma as the starting source to find that there were detectable amounts of PAF acetylhydrolase in the first two steps of the purification (Fig. 6B), but that even the first step of PON1 purification from PAF acetylhydrolase-depleted HDL was free of this contaminating enzyme by immunoblot analysis.


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   PON1 purified from HDL depleted of PAF acetylhydrolase does not act as a phospholipase. A, Coomassie Blue-stained SDS-PAGE of fractions obtained during PON1 purification from PAF acetylhydrolase-depleted HDL. Lane 1, molecular mass markers; lane 2, Cibacron fraction; lane 3, DEAE fractions 39-45; lane 4, DEAE fractions 46-52; lane 5, DEAE fractions 28-34; lane 6, second DEAE column fractions 39-45; lane 7, PON1 control; lane 8, Concanavalin A fraction. B, Western blot for PAF acetylhydrolase in PON1 fractions isolated from neutral plasma or from HDL isolated from plasma incubated overnight at an alkaline pH to shift PAF acetylhydrolase out of HDL. C, effect of PON1 purified in two ways on PAF or oxidized phospholipids extracted from oxidized LDL. PON1 was purified from plasma at a neutral pH or from HDL depleted of PAF acetylhydrolase as above and tested for the ability to inactivate PAF as an agonist for Fura-2 loaded PMN as described in Fig. 1.

However the above results show that even when PAF acetylhydrolase cannot be detected by an immunoblot, there still may be enough enzyme to inactivate significant amounts PAF. We then compared PAF hydrolysis by the PON1 preparation apparently free of PAF acetylhydrolase to material purified in the standard way from neutral plasma, which had the same specific final aryl esterase activity. We found that this strategy was effective in separating aryl esterase activity from PAF hydrolytic activity, because PON1 purified from HDL depleted of PAF acetylhydrolase by pre-incubation at an alkaline pH did not hydrolyze PAF (Fig. 6C), whereas PON1 purified using a standard protocol hydrolyzed PAF as before. We tested the PON1 preparation devoid of PAF hydrolytic activity for its ability to inactive the PAF-like lipids found in oxidized LDL. PON1 devoid of PAF acetylhydrolase, in contrast to a standard preparation of PON1, also lacked oxidized phospholipid phospholipase activity (Fig. 6C). Therefore PON1 does not, by itself, hydrolyze either PAF or oxidized phospholipids possessing PAF-like bioactivity.

Genetic Ablation of PAF Acetylhydrolase Shows PON1 Has No Role in PAF or Oxidized Phospholipid Metabolism-- There are genetic polymorphisms and mutations in the human PAF acetylhydrolase gene, and the more common of these produces catalytically inactive PAF acetylhydrolase that does not persist in the circulation (39). Plasma from such an individual offers the opportunity to test the contribution of PON1 to PAF catabolism. We found that plasma from an individual with wild-type PAF acetylhydrolase completely inactivated PAF, whereas plasma from an individual with a mutant form of the gene did not (Fig. 7A). This difference in PAF hydrolytic capability did not arise from the presence of an inhibitory agent as a mixing experiment showed that the plasma from the mutant donor did not affect PAF hydrolysis by normal plasma or recombinant PAF acetylhydrolase. We repeated this experiment (Fig. 7B) using oxidized phospholipids as the substrate with similar results; a point mutation in the gene encoding PAF acetylhydrolase abolishes the hydrolysis of oxidized phospholipids with PAF-like bioactivity. We then measured aryl esterase activity in plasma from individuals with wild-type or mutant PAF acetylhydrolase to find that there was no diminution in PON1 activity by this mutation (Fig. 7C). The bulk of the plasma aryl esterase activity in both types of plasma was sensitive to EDTA and therefore reflects PON1 activity. Thus even though both PON1 and PAF acetylhydrolase are components of HDL, their expression is independent of one another.


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Plasma from an individual with a mutation in the PAF acetylhydrolase gene contains paraoxonase activity but does not hydrolyze PAF. A, plasma from an individual with a mutation in the PAF acetylhydrolase gene does not hydrolyze PAF, and mixing experiments with recombinant PAF acetylhydrolase or normal plasma show the lack of activity does not arise from the presence of an inhibitor. B, plasma from an individual with a mutation in the PAF acetylhydrolase gene does not hydrolyze oxidized phospholipids extracted from oxidized LDL. Mixing experiments show the loss of this activity is not because of an inhibitor. C, plasma from an individual lacking PAF acetylhydrolase retains a normal level of PON1 aryl esterase activity. Aryl esterase activity was measured as described under "Materials and Methods" with or without a preincubation with 1 mM EDTA to destabilize and inhibit PON1.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We discovered that highly purified preparations of human PON1 inactivate PAF and PAF-like oxidatively fragmented phospholipids by hydrolyzing the sn-2 residue to produce two inactive products, lysoPAF and a short chain free fatty acid. This reaction suppresses atherogenesis, and it protects lipoprotein particles from chemically reactive phospholipids. Genetic deletion of PON1 activity in mice creates animals that are susceptible to organophosphate intoxication and, importantly, demonstrate an increased propensity to form atherosclerotic lesions when placed on a high fat diet or an apoE knock-out background (7, 40, 41). Conversely, transgenic mice with increased levels of circulating PON1 are less susceptible to developing atherosclerosis (42, 43), as are mice expressing PAF acetylhydrolase as a transgene (44). These observations, coupled with extensive literature (4-13) indicating that paraoxonase is beneficial and hydrolyzes PAF-like phospholipid oxidation products that are formed during LDL oxidation (19, 23) to inactive products, suggest that this is the way PON1 exerts its salubrious effects. Hydrolysis of oxidatively modified and fragmented phospholipids that are PAF receptor agonists (19, 23, 45), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ligands and agonists (46), and structurally inappropriate and disruptive phospholipids (47-50) are of unquestioned value in protecting against atherosclerosis, but this reaction is not accomplished by PON1.

PON1 is an organophosphatase (51) that protects animals that express it against intoxication by organophosphate insecticides (7). If PON1 attacks the phosphodiester of biologically active phosphatidylcholines then it would inactivate 1-O-hexadecyl-2-O-methyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, a PAF analog that is not a substrate for the esterolytic activity of phospholipases A1 or A2. It did not. Instead we find that purified human PON1 inactivated PAF, as reported (32), where the single bond susceptible to esterolytic activity resides at the sn-2 position. This is the same type of activity displayed by the PAF acetylhydrolase that is also a component of certain HDL particles (31).

Physical resolution of PON1 and PAF acetylhydrolase has been found previously to be challenging (2, 6, 32). We, like other investigators (32), tested our PON1 preparation for the presence of PAF acetylhydrolase by Western blotting for the enzyme with negative results. Other investigators have searched for PAF acetylhydrolase contamination by mass spectroscopy (12, 13) and sequencing (32). But whether any of these methods is sufficient to detect PAF acetylhydrolase contamination at low levels, but levels still sufficient to account for the observed catalytic activity, have not been investigated. We find that we easily detect 100 ng, but not 10 ng, of PAF acetylhydrolase by Western blotting. We also find, however, that as little as 5 to 10 ng of PAF acetylhydrolase is sufficient to account for all of the phospholipase activity in our purified PON1 preparations.

Could low levels of PAF acetylhydrolase confer phospholipase activity to purified PON1? Certainly this is of concern when prolonged incubations are employed (5) when we find a few nanograms of PAF acetylhydrolase destroys PAF and oxidized phospholipids in a little as 15 min. We find that hydrolysis of PAF and PAF-like oxidized phospholipids by purified human PON1 was insensitive to EDTA, yet PON1, and especially human PON1 (2), is not stable in the absence of Ca2+ and other divalent cations. Human PON1 is even inactivated by choosing EDTA over heparin during a blood draw (3). We find (34) that PAF acetylhydrolase is a Ca2+-independent phospholipase A2 that is insensitive to EDTA.

Conversely, PAF acetylhydrolase with its classic serine esterase GXSXG motif is inhibited by compounds like Pefabloc (52) that derivatize activated serines. Pefabloc effectively inhibited PAF and oxidized phospholipid hydrolysis by purified PON1, but PON1 does not contain a signature serine esterase motif (53). Rather, histidine, aspartate, glutamate, and a tryptophan residues are essential for paraoxonase activity (54). PON1 is not inhibited by serine esterase inhibitors like diisopropylfluorophosphate (37), which in fact is a substrate (33, 55). Experiments with inhibitors indicate that there is a potential for PAF acetylhydrolase to contaminate and alter the apparent enzymatic activity of PON1. This conclusion is strengthened by the report that PON1 knock-out mice show no diminution in their levels of PAF acetylhydrolase activity (7).

PON1 and PAF acetylhydrolase are localized in the same lipoprotein particle, have the same molecular weights (33, 34), and share physical properties that make complete separation difficult. There is a distinguishing property of PAF acetylhydrolase that has proved useful in separating these two enzymes. Two-thirds of serum PAF acetylhydrolase is associated with LDL particles, and one-third is associated with apoE-containing HDL particles (31), but this distribution can be manipulated. A brief incubation at alkaline pH transfers HDL-associated PAF acetylhydrolase activity to the LDL fraction, and the converse result is obtained under acidic conditions (31). We found this maneuver caused PAF acetylhydrolase mass and activity to redistribute to the LDL fraction leaving PON1 in HDL. This result offers a further indirect indication that PON1 does not significantly contribute to PAF hydrolysis, because PAF hydrolytic activity tracked with PAF acetylhydrolase mass.

PON1 purified from PAF acetylhydrolase-depleted HDL, in contrast to that purified in the standard way from plasma, did not show phospholipase A2-like activity and did not hydrolyze PAF. The PON1 preparation free of PAF hydrolytic activity also did not inactivate PAF-like oxidized phospholipids. Physical separation of the two enzymes allows us to conclude that PON1 is not an oxidized phospholipid phospholipase. In fact PAF acetylhydrolase is the only lipoprotein-associated enzyme with this activity, as shown by the complete lack of PAF and oxidized phospholipid hydrolytic activity in the plasma of an individual with an inactivating mutation of the PAF acetylhydrolase gene. Plasma from this individual displayed full aryl esterase activity, so these two activities are also genetically separable. The active site responsible for the aryl esterase activity of PON1 is clearly separable from that catalyzing PAF hydrolysis (32), because two enzymes are responsible for the two unrelated activities.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We greatly appreciate the gift of PAF acetylhydrolase-deficient plasma from Tada-atsu Imaizumi and Kei Satoh (Hirosaki University). We thank Jason Hansen for early experiments assaying paraoxonase activity, Dee Biddle for Western analysis, Stephen Prescott for thoughtful input, and Cletus D'Souza for initial experiments, and we appreciate the technical aid of Donnie Benson, Jennifer Eyre, and Margaret Vogel. We also appreciate the graphics created by Diana Lim.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants HL 44513 and HL 44525.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed: 4130 EIHG, 2030 E. 15 N., University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5330. Tel.: 801-585-0716; Fax: 801-585-0701; E-mail: tom.mcintyre@hmbg.utah.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 3, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M211126200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: PON1, paraoxonase-1; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein; PAF, platelet-activating factor; PMN, polymorphonuclear leukocyte.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Mackness, M. I., Mackness, B., Durrington, P. N., Connelly, P. W., and Hegele, R. A. (1996) Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 7, 69-76[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Kuo, C. L., and La Du, B. N. (1995) Drug Metab. Dispos. 23, 935-944[Abstract]
3. Mackness, M. I. (1998) Atherosclerosis 136, 195-196[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Mackness, M. I., Arrol, S., and Durrington, P. N. (1991) FEBS Lett. 286, 152-154[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Watson, A. D., Berliner, J. A., Hama, S. Y., La Du, B. N., Faull, K. F., Fogelman, A. M., and Navab, M. (1995) J. Clin. Invest. 96, 2882-2891[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Aviram, M., Rosenblat, M., Bisgaier, C. L., Newton, R. S., Primo-Parmo, S. L., and La Du, B. N. (1998) J. Clin. Invest. 101, 1581-1590[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Shih, D. M., Gu, L., Xia, Y. R., Navab, M., Li, W. F., Hama, S., Castellani, L. W., Furlong, C. E., Costa, L. G., Fogelman, A. M., and Lusis, A. J. (1998) Nature 394, 284-287[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Subbanagounder, G., Leitinger, N., Shih, P. T., Faull, K. F., and Berliner, J. A. (1999) Circ. Res. 85, 311-318[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Navab, M., Hama, S. Y., Anantharamaiah, G. M., Hassan, K., Hough, G. P., Watson, A. D., Reddy, S. T., Sevanian, A., Fonarow, G. C., and Fogelman, A. M. (2000) J. Lipid Res. 41, 1495-1508[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Aviram, M., Hardak, E., Vaya, J., Mahmood, S., Milo, S., Hoffman, A., Billicke, S., Draganov, D., and Rosenblat, M. (2000) Circulation 101, 2510-2517[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Durrington, P. N., Mackness, B., and Mackness, M. I. (2001) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 21, 473-480[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Ahmed, Z., Ravandi, A., Maguire, G. F., Emili, A., Draganov, D., La Du, B. N., Kuksis, A., and Connelly, P. W. (2002) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 290, 391-396[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Ahmed, Z., Ravandi, A., Maguire, G. F., Emili, A., Draganov, D., La Du, B. N., Kuksis, A., and Connelly, P. W. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 24473-24481[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Jarvik, G. P., Rozek, L. S., Brophy, V. H., Hatsukami, T. S., Richter, R. J., Schellenberg, G. D., and Furlong, C. E. (2000) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 20, 2441-2447[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Furlong, C. E., Cole, T. B., Jarvik, G. P., and Costa, L. G. (2002) Pharmacogenomics 3, 341-348[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Cao, H., Girard-Globa, A., Berthezene, F., and Moulin, P. (1999) J. Lipid Res. 40, 133-139[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Sorenson, R. C., Primo-Parmo, S. L., Kuo, C. L., Adkins, S., Lockridge, O., and La Du, B. N. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 7187-7191[Abstract]
18. Aviram, M., Billecke, S., Sorenson, R., Bisgaier, C., Newton, R., Rosenblat, M., Erogul, J., Hsu, C., Dunlop, C., and La Du, B. (1998) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 18, 1617-1624[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. McIntyre, T. M., Zimmerman, G. A., and Prescott, S. M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 25189-25192[Free Full Text]
20. Izumi, T., and Shimizu, T. (1995) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1259, 317-333[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Silva, A. R., de Assis, E. F., Caiado, L. F., Marathe, G. K., Bozza, M. T., McIntyre, T. M., Zimmerman, G. A., Prescott, S. M., Bozza, P. T., and Castro-Faria-Neto, H. C. (2002) J. Immunol. 168, 4112-4120[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Heery, J. M., Kozak, M., Stafforini, D. M., Jones, D. A., Zimmerman, G. A., McIntyre, T. M., and Prescott, S. M. (1995) J. Clin. Invest. 96, 2322-2330[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Marathe, G. K., Davies, S. S., Harrison, K. A., Silva, A. R., Murphy, R. C., Castro-Faria Neto, H., Prescott, S. M., Zimmerman, G. A., and McIntyre, T. M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 28395-28405[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Prescott, S. M., Zimmerman, G. A., Stafforini, D. M., and McIntyre, T. M. (2000) Ann. Rev. Biochem. 69, 419-445[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Watson, A. D., Leitinger, N., Navab, M., Faull, K. F., Horkko, S., Witztum, J. L., Palinski, W., Schwenke, D., Salomon, R. G., Sha, W., Subbanagounder, G., Fogelman, A. M., and Berliner, J. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 13597-13607[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Imaizumi, T., Satoh, K., Yoshida, H., Kawamura, H., Hiramoto, M., and Takamatsu, S. (1991) Atherosclerosis 87, 47-55[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Lehr, H. A., Weyrich, A. S., Saetzler, R. K., Jurek, A., Arfors, K. E., Zimmerman, G. A., Prescott, S. M., and McIntyre, T. M. (1997) J. Clin. Invest. 99, 2358-2364[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Stremler, K. E., Stafforini, D. M., Prescott, S. M., Zimmerman, G. A., and McIntyre, T. M. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 5331-5334[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Stremler, K. E., Stafforini, D. M., Prescott, S. M., and McIntyre, T. M. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 11095-11103[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Tjoelker, L. W., Eberhardt, C., Unger, J., Trong, H. L., Zimmerman, G. A., McIntyre, T. M., Stafforini, D. M., Prescott, S. M., and Gray, P. W. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 25481-25487[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Stafforini, D. M., McIntyre, T. M., Carter, M. E., and Prescott, S. M. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 4215-4222[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Rodrigo, L., Mackness, B., Durrington, P. N., Hernandez, A., and Mackness, M. I. (2001) Biochem. J. 354, 1-7[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Gan, K. N., Smolen, A., Eckerson, H. W., and La Du, B. N. (1991) Drug Metab. Dispos. 19, 100-106[Abstract]
34. Stafforini, D. M., Prescott, S. M., and McIntyre, T. M. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 4223-4230[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Zimmerman, G. A., McIntyre, T. M., and Prescott, S. M. (1985) J. Clin. Investig. 76, 2235-2246[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Marathe, G. K., Silva, A. R., de Castro Faria Neto, H. C., Tjoelker, L. W., Prescott, S. M., Zimmerman, G. A., and McIntyre, T. M. (2001) J. Lipid Res. 42, 1430-1437[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. La Du, B. (1992) in Pharmacogenetics of Drug Metabolism (Kalow, W., ed) , pp. 51-91, Pergamon Press, New York
38. Tjoelker, L. W., Wilder, C., Eberhardt, C., Stafforini, D. M., Dietsch, G., Schimpf, B., Hooper, S., Le, Trong, H., Cousens, L. S., Zimmerman, G. A., Yamada, Y., McIntyre, T. M., Prescott, S. M., and Gray, P. W. (1995) Nature 374, 549-553[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Stafforini, D. M., Satoh, K., Atkinson, D. L., Tjoelker, L. W., Eberhardt, C., Yoshida, H., Imaizumi, T.-A., Takamatsu, S., Zimmerman, G. A., McIntyre, T. M., Gray, P. W., and Prescott, S. M. (1996) J. Clin. Invest. 97, 2784-2791[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Shih, D. M., Gu, L., Hama, S., Xia, Y. R., Navab, M., Fogelman, A. M., and Lusis, A. J. (1996) J. Clin. Invest. 97, 1630-1639[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Shih, D. M., Xia, Y. R., Wang, X. P., Miller, E., Castellani, L. W., Subbanagounder, G., Cheroutre, H., Faull, K. F., Berliner, J. A., Witztum, J. L., and Lusis, A. J. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 17527-17535[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Oda, M. N., Bielicki, J. K., Ho, T. T., Berger, T., Rubin, E. M., and Forte, T. M. (2002) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 290, 921-927[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Tward, A., Xia, Y. R., Wang, X. P., Shi, Y. S., Park, C., Castellani, L. W., Lusis, A. J., and Shih, D. M. (2002) Circulation 106, 484-490[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Quarck, R., De, Geest, B., Stengel, D., Mertens, A., Lox, M., Theilmeier, G., Michiels, C., Raes, M., Bult, H., Collen, D., Van Veldhoven, P., Ninio, E., and Holvoet, P. (2001) Circulation 103, 2495-2500[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Smiley, P. L., Stremler, K. E., Prescott, S. M., Zimmerman, G. A., and McIntyre, T. M. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 11104-11110[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Davies, S. S., Pontsler, A. V., Marathe, G. K., Harrison, K. A., Murphy, R. C., Hinshaw, J. C., Prestwich, G. D., St, Hilaire, A., Prescott, S. M., Zimmerman, G. A., and McIntyre, T. M. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 16015-16023[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Dousset, N., Dousset, J. C., and Douste-Blazy, L. (1981) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 641, 1-10[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Itabe, H., Kobayashi, T., and Inoue, K. (1988) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 961, 13-21[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Itabe, H., Kushi, Y., Handa, S., and Inoue, K. (1988) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 962, 8-15[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Tokumura, A., Sumida, T., Toujima, M., Kogure, K., Fukuzawa, K., Takahashi, Y., and Yamamoto, S. (2000) J. Lipid Res. 41, 953-962[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51. Costa, L. G., Li, W. F., Richter, R. J., Shih, D. M., Lusis, A., and Furlong, C. E. (1999) Chem. Biol. Interact. 119-120, 429-438[CrossRef]
52. Dentan, C., Tselepis, A. D., Chapman, M. J., and Ninio, E. (1996) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1299, 353-357[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Hassett, C., Richter, R. J., Humbert, R., Chapline, C., Crabb, J. W., Omiecinski, C. J., and Furlong, C. E. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 10141-10149[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Josse, D., Lockridge, O., Xie, W., Bartels, C. F., Schopfer, L. M., and Masson, P. (2001) J. Appl. Toxicol. 21 Suppl. 1, 7-11[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
55. Smolen, A., Eckerson, H. W., Gan, K. N., Hailat, N., and La Du, B. N. (1991) Drug Metab. Dispos. 19, 107-112[Abstract]


Copyright © 2003 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.