Interactions of Substrate with Calreticulin, an Endoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone*,

Mili KapoorDagger §, Honnappa SrinivasDagger §, Eaazhisai KandiahDagger , Emiliano Gemma||, Lars Ellgaard**, Stefan Oscarson||, Ari Helenius**, and Avadhesha SuroliaDagger DaggerDagger

From the Dagger  Molecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India, the || Department of Organic Chemistry, Arrhenius laboratory, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden, and ** Institute of Biochemistry, ETH-Zurich, Hoenggerberg, CH-8093, Switzerland

Received for publication, September 6, 2002, and in revised form, November 27, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Calreticulin is a molecular chaperone found in the endoplasmic reticulum in eukaryotes, and its interaction with N-glycosylated polypeptides is mediated by the glycan Glc1Man7-9GlcNAc2 present on the target glycoproteins. Here, we report the thermodynamic parameters of its interaction with di-, tri-, and tetrasaccharide, which are truncated versions of the glucosylated arm of Glc1Man7-9GlcNAc2, determined by the quantitative technique of isothermal titration calorimetry. This method provides a direct estimate of the binding constants (Kb) and changes in enthalpy of binding (Delta Hb°) as well as the stoichiometry of the reaction. Unlike past speculations, these studies demonstrate unambiguously that calreticulin has only one site per molecule for binding its complementary glucosylated ligands. Although the binding of glucose by itself is not detectable, a binding constant of 4.19 × 104 M-1 at 279 K is obtained when glucose occurs in alpha -1,3 linkage to Manalpha Me as in Glcalpha 1-3Manalpha Me. The binding constant increases by 25-fold from di- to trisaccharide and doubles from tri- to tetrasaccharide, demonstrating that the entire Glcalpha 1-3Manalpha 1-2Manalpha 1-2Manalpha Me structure of the oligosaccharide is recognized by calreticulin. The thermodynamic parameters thus obtained were supported by modeling studies, which showed that increased number of hydrogen bonds and van der Waals interactions occur as the size of the oligosaccharide is increased. Also, several novel findings about the recognition of saccharide ligands by calreticulin vis á vis legume lectins, which have the same fold as this chaperone, are discussed.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Calreticulin (CRT),1 along with calnexin, serves as a molecular chaperone in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) of eukaryotic cells. Although calreticulin is a soluble, luminal protein, calnexin is a type I membrane protein (1, 2). Segments of these proteins share amino acid identity ranging from 42 to 78% (3). Calreticulin is a highly conserved ubiquitous protein (Mr 46,000) and has been implicated in Ca2+ storage and intracellular Ca2+ signaling in the sarcoplasmic and endoplasmic reticula (4, 5). CRT has been divided into three regions: the N-terminal, the C-terminal, and the central P-domain, which consists of short sequence motifs repeated three times in tandem. The N-terminal domain is highly conserved among CRTs from different species and potentially mediates interactions between CRT and the ER folding catalysts, protein disulfide isomerase and ERp57 (6, 7). Recent studies show that the P-domain, previously thought to be involved in oligosaccharide binding, interacts directly with ERp57 (8-10). The C-domain is characterized by a high content of acidic residues (4, 11), which is consistent with the location of a low affinity (Kd = ~1-2 mM), high capacity (~25-50 mol) calcium-binding site (12) and contains the ER retrieval sequence.

The ER plays an essential role in the folding and maturation of newly synthesized proteins in the secretory pathway. ER quality control operates at various levels; one of the most common modifications of proteins translocated into the ER is the addition of N-linked glycans (13). CRT has been found to bind to partially trimmed, monoglucosylated glycans, and it has been shown that the binding of calreticulin involves a direct oligosaccharide-protein interaction specific for monoglucosylated oligosaccharides (14-17). Recently the crystal structure of the luminal domain of calnexin has been published (18), which shows a single carbohydrate-binding site in its lectin domain. Given the sequence similarity between calnexin and calreticulin, the carbohydrate-binding site in the latter should reside in the corresponding homologous domain.

The binding of CRT is exquisitely specific for the monoglucosylated N-linked oligosaccharides, which appear as transient intermediates in vivo. The chaperone function of calreticulin is assisted by two enzymes of contrasting catalytic activities: UDP-glucose:glycoprotein glucosyltransferase and glucosidase. The sequential action of glucosidase I and II removes two glucose residues from Glc3Man5-9GlcNAc2 from N-linked glycoproteins in the ER (19), whereas UDP-glucose:glycoprotein glucosyltransferase catalyzes the addition of glucose on the nonreducing end mannose of the alpha 1-3 arm of Man5-9GlcNAc2 chains of unfolded glycoproteins, thereby acting as a folding sensor (20, 21). Repeated cycles of reglucosylation by the glucosyltransferase lead to prolonged association of calreticulin with the unfolded protein until its appropriate folding occurs. Should this process fail, the protein is retrotranslocated to the cytosol and subsequently degraded by the proteasome (22).

Substrate studies have identified the single-terminal glucose residue as a critical determinant recognized by calreticulin because oligosaccharides containing 0, 2, or 3 glucose residues fail to bind (14, 23). Oligosaccharide binding is critical for the formation of complexes between glycoproteins and calreticulin. If N-linked glycosylation is blocked with tunicamycin or if production of the Glc1Man9GlcNAc2 species is prevented by treatment with the glucosidase inhibitors castenospermine or deoxynojirimycin, the binding of calreticulin to a vast majority of proteins is inhibited (15, 24).

Thus, because of the importance of the calreticulin-glycoprotein interaction in various biological processes, the study of calreticulin-oligosaccharide interactions at the molecular level has become imperative. The oligosaccharide binding studies on calreticulin and calnexin have been limited because of the nonavailability of N-linked sugar Glc1Man9GlcNAc2 in sufficient amounts from natural sources as well as the difficulty in synthesizing such large oligosaccharide structures. Here, we report the interaction of di-, tri-, and tetrasaccharide with calreticulin using the quantitative technique of isothermal titration calorimetry. We report the stoichiometry, binding constant, and various thermodynamic parameters for these interactions. Calreticulin-sugar binding is enthalpically driven, the binding enthalpies of tetrasaccharide being larger than those of the trisaccharide and the enthalpies of trisaccharide binding being larger than those observed for disaccharide. These thermodynamic data thus define in quantitative terms the extended combining site of calreticulin for the glucosylated arm of the oligosaccharide. Moreover, these data are consistent with the model of the complexes of calreticulin with these sugars.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- Media components were obtained from Hi-media (Delhi, India). GST-agarose, reduced glutathione, isopropyl-1-thio-beta -D-galactopyranoside, MOPS, and SDS-PAGE reagents were obtained from Sigma.

Synthesis of Oligosaccharides-- All three of the oligosaccharides have been synthesized previously (25-27). However, in our approach the glucose moiety was introduced last, using thioglycoside donors in both tetrasaccharide and trisaccharide synthesis. This is the route followed by Matta and colleagues (25) in tetrasaccharide synthesis, whereas Cherif et al. (27) used a 2 + 2 block approach. The overall yield over the three glycosylations was 24% (66, 76, and 48%) as compared with those of Matta and colleagues (25) 19% (78, 64, and 39%) and Monneret and colleagues (27) 11% (49, 48, and 47%). In the trisaccharide synthesis, this approach (1 + 2) has been employed earlier by Cherif and Monneret (26) using a glucose trichloroacetimidate donor advantageously. Our attempt, using a glucose thioglycoside donor, gave comparable results (19% as compared with a 22% overall yield). Carbohydrate concentrations were determined by the phenol-sulfuric acid method of Dubois et al. (28) using mannose as a standard. The details of the oligosaccharide synthesis used are shown in Scheme 1 and in the Supplemental Material (available on line at http://www.jbc.org).


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Scheme 1.   Synthesis of the di-, tri-, and tetrasaccharides. i, NIS/AgOTf, CH2Cl2; ii, NaOMe, MeOH; iii, 8, DMTST, Et2O; iv, H2, Pd/C; v, DMTST, CH2Cl2; vi, aqueous AcOH 70%; vii, a, 8, Br2, CH2Cl2, and b, Bu4NBr.

Expression and Purification of Recombinant Calreticulin-- The GST-CRT full-length fusion protein was purified essentially as described by Peterson and Helenius (29). Briefly, the construct was transformed into Escherichia coli DH5alpha cells. An overnight plateau phase culture was used to inoculate fresh Luria broth containing 50 µg/ml ampicillin, 2 mM calcium chloride at a dilution of 1:100. Cells were grown at 30 °C to an A600 of 0.4-0.6 and were induced by 0.2 mM isopropyl-1-thio-beta -D-galactopyranoside followed by incubation for an additional 6 h. The cells were harvested and resuspended in a 1:10 culture volume of lysis buffer (500 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.5) and sonicated on ice using a Branson tip sonicator. Lysates thus obtained were loaded onto GST-agarose (equilibrated with 2 bed volumes of lysis buffer). The specifically bound protein was eluted by 5 mM reduced glutathione in Tris buffer. The eluate was concentrated using a 10-kDa Amicon concentrator and dialyzed against a 10 mM MOPS, 5 mM CaCl2, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5, buffer.

Protein Estimation-- The E280 of calreticulin was estimated as 1.94 using the method of Gill and von Hippel (30). For a 1-mg ml-1 GST-CRT solution, A280 was determined as 1.06.

Isothermal Titration Calorimetry-- ITC experiments were performed using a VP-ITC calorimeter from Microcal Inc. (Northampton, MA) as described previously by Wiseman et al. (31). For titrations involving tri- and tetrasaccharide, typically 90 µM protein (in 10 mM MOPS, 5 mM CaCl2, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) in a sample cell, volume 1.4181 ml, was titrated with 10× excess sugar (present in same buffer) from the 300-µl stirrer syringe. For the titration of disaccharide, for example, 100 µM protein was used, and the sugar (1.3 mM) was added as 30-40 injections of 6 µl into the sample cell. The titrations were performed while samples were being stirred at 400 rpm at the required temperatures. An interval of 3 min between each injection was given for the base line to stabilize. The heat-of-dilution values of the sugar were subtracted from the titration data. The data so obtained were fitted via the nonlinear least-squares minimization method to determine binding stoichiometry (n), the binding constant (Kb), and the change in enthalpy (Delta Hb°) using Origin software (Microcal) as described previously (31, 32). The experimental conditions ensured that the c value ranged between 2 and 130, where c = Kb × Mt (0) and Mt (0) is the initial macromolecule concentration for all of the titrations.

Modeling Studies-- Because the crystal structure of calreticulin has not been determined, the substrate specificity of this protein to various sugars was investigated by computer modeling using the MODELLER suite of programs (33, 34). The crystal structure of calnexin (Ref. 17, PDB code 1JHN) provided the template needed for modeling the structure of calreticulin. The modeled structure of calreticulin was then subjected to simulated annealing and positional refinement using the CNS suite of programs (35, 36). All of the oligosaccharide structures used to examine the binding mode to calreticulin were obtained from SWEET dB (37). The mode of binding of the following oligosaccharides was examined: Glc/Glcalpha Me, Glcalpha 1-3Manalpha Me, Glcalpha 1-3Manalpha 1-2Manalpha Me, Glcalpha 1-3Manalpha 1-2Manalpha 1-2Manalpha Me, Manalpha 1-3Manalpha Me.

The sugar-binding site in the modeled calreticulin was deduced from analogy to the crystal structure of calnexin. The monosaccharide was docked into the binding site using the docking package SYBYL (SYBYL® 6.7.1 Tripos Inc., St. Louis, MO). The docking geometry was improved by optimizing the overlap between the functional description of the binding site and the ligand, generating multiple solutions. The least energy solution was taken as the best conformation of the glucose to interact with the protein. This solution was then subjected to positional refinement using CNS. Retaining the position and orientation of the glucose ring with respect to the protein, the disaccharide was superposed on the monosaccharide using the program ALIGN. The protein and sugar coordinates were further examined using INSIGHT II. All possible conformations relating the two sugar moieties were explored at intervals of 10°. The best conformation was chosen as the one making the maximum number of hydrogen bonds and minimum short contacts with the protein. Following a similar procedure, the trisaccharide was superposed on the best conformer of the disaccharide. Retaining the torsion angles along the alpha -1,3 linkage of the disaccharide, the dihedral angle of the 1-2 linkage was allowed to vary from 0 to 360° in intervals of 10°. A similar procedure was followed for building the tetrasaccharide. The conformation along the alpha -1,2 linkage between the third and fourth mannose sugars was varied through 0 to 360° at intervals of 10°. The best conformer at every stage was subjected to positional refinement using CNS.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We studied the oligosaccharide binding properties of calreticulin by isothermal titration calorimetry as it provides a direct estimate of the binding constants (Kb) and changes in enthalpy of binding (Delta Hb°) as well as the stoichiometry of the reaction (n). Additionally, the results obtained were rationalized on the model of calreticulin built by its homology with the recently solved structure of calnexin (18).

Thermodynamics of Calreticulin-Sugar Interactions-- The results of a representative titration of the disaccharide, trisaccharide, and tetrasaccharide to calreticulin at 293 K are shown in Fig. 1. Each of these titrations exhibits a monotonic decrease in the exothermic heat of binding with each successive injection until saturation is achieved. A nonlinear least-squares fit of the ITC data to the identical site model is also shown. The close fit of the data to the identical site model shows that calreticulin has only one type of site for its complementary sugar ligand. The thermodynamic parameters, Delta Gb°, Delta Hb°, and Delta Sb at 279 and 293 K, determined from the titration calorimetry measurements are presented in Table I. The values of Kb increase almost by a factor of 2 from tri- to tetrasaccharide. Also, there is a greater than 25-fold increase in the binding constant from di- to trisaccharide. These findings demonstrate that calreticulin recognizes all four of the residues on the glucosylated branch of the Glc1Man9GlcNAc2 oligosaccharide. The disaccharide Manalpha 1-2Manalpha Me and Manalpha 1-3Manalpha Me did not show any binding to the protein, thus demonstrating the importance of the terminal glucose residue for the interaction. These studies are qualitatively consistent with those of Williams and colleagues (38), who tested a variety of mono-, di-, and oligosaccharides for their ability to inhibit the binding of [3H]Glc1Man9GlcNAc2 to GST-CRT immobilized on glutathione-agarose. The smallest inhibitory compounds were the disaccharides, Glcalpha 1-3Man and Glcalpha 1-3Glc. Also, the trisaccharide, Glcalpha 1-3Manalpha 1-2Man, and the tetrasaccharide, Glcalpha 1-3Manalpha 1-2Manalpha 1-2Man, were ~100- and ~500-fold, respectively, more potent inhibitors than the disaccharides.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Isothermal calorimetric titration of calreticulin with different sugars. Raw data obtained after 6-µl injections of 1 mM sugar solution into 100 µM calreticulin in 10 mM MOPS buffer containing 5 mM CaCl2 and 150 mM NaCl at 293 K (top). Nonlinear least-squares fit (-) of the heat released as a function of the added ligand (black-square) for the titration (bottom) is also shown. The data were fitted to a single-site model to obtain n, Delta Hb°, and Kb, respectively, for: disaccharide, 0.94 (±0.04), 2.2 (±0.15) kcal/mol, and 2.4 × 104 (±0.5) M-1 (A); trisaccharide, 0.89 (± 0.002), 6.9 (± 0.031) kcal/mol, and 6.1 × 104 (± 0.42) M-1 (B); and tetrasaccharide, 0.99 (±0.006), 10.44 (±0.088) kcal/mol, and 1.09 × 106 (±0.05) M-1 (C). The values in parentheses are the errors associated with each fitted parameter for a given experiment.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Thermodynamic quantities for the binding of sugars to calreticulin
Each value is an average of four determinations. The values in parentheses are the standard deviations.

The thermodynamics of the binding reaction presented in Table I shows that the binding reaction is entropically driven for Glcalpha 1-3Manalpha Me and enthalpically driven for the tetrasaccharide, whereas for the trisaccharide, Glcalpha 1-3Manalpha 1-2Manalpha Me, the switch between these two modes occur. The changes in enthalpy observed upon the binding of tetrasaccharide are the highest. Also from the data in Table I, it appears that the changes in enthalpy and entropy upon binding are compensatory (Fig. 2). Similar enthalpy-entropy compensation has been observed earlier for many protein-ligand interactions (39).


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Enthalpy-entropy compensation plot of Delta Hb° as a function of TDelta Sb for the binding of di (black-triangle)-, tri (black-down-triangle )-, and tetrasaccharide () to calreticulin. The plot shows a linear relationship with a slope of 1.25.

Calreticulin Modeling Studies-- A model of calreticulin based upon the structure of calnexin is shown in Fig. 3B. The modeling studies provided a rationale for the sugar specificity of calreticulin. The binding site residues in calreticulin for glucose corresponding to those in calnexin are Tyr-109, Lys-111, Tyr-128, Met-131, Asp-135, Gly-124, and Asp-317 (Fig. 4 and Ref. 18). The monosaccharide, i.e. Glcalpha Me, was hydrogen-bonded to the side chains of Tyr-109, Tyr-128, Asp-135, and Asp-317. The best conformer of the disaccharide interacted with the protein through six hydrogen bonds made by the second sugar moiety along with the five hydrogen bonds contributed by the first sugar. The addition of the third sugar to the disaccharide introduced three more hydrogen bonds with the protein. The fourth sugar of the tetrasaccharide contributed three additional hydrogen bonds to the interactions with the protein. Likewise, the nonpolar interactions also increased with the size of the oligosaccharide chain. The contacts with the residues of the protein made by the four sugars are listed in Table II.


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   A, the sequence alignment of calnexin and calreticulin. The structure of calreticulin was obtained by homology modeling using the crystal structure of calnexin (PDB code 1JHN). The figure shows the sequence alignment of those regions of calreticulin that were modeled against calnexin (CNX). Residues 21-349 of calreticulin share similarity with residues 70-458 of calnexin. SSHM, secondary structure of the homology modeled structure and E-beta -strand, H-helix, L-loop. This figure was made using CHROMA. B, modeled structure of calreticulin using calnexin as the template. The structure contains six beta -strands in the concave sheet (red), seven beta -strands in the convex sheet (green), and two additional beta -strands forming the roof sheet (blue). The alpha -helix, which shields the hydrophobic regions of the convex beta -sheet, thus preventing the oligomerization of monomers, is shown in yellow. As the structure of the P-domain was not of importance to the present study, it is not shown in the model.


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   A, LIGPLOT representation of the tetrasaccharide interactions in the modeled calreticulin-tetrasaccharide complex. Hydrogen bonds within a distance of 2.5 to 3.35 Å are denoted by dotted lines. Hydrophobic interactions within 3.9 Å are included. B, view of the sugar-binding site of calreticulin along with the tetrasaccharide. The residues that may be involved in hydrogen bond interactions with the sugar are shown as sticks. C, a Conolly surface representation of the sugar-binding site of calreticulin with the tetrasaccharide shown as sticks.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Hydrogen bonding interactions made by calreticulin residues with sugar moieties
The residues that may be involved in hydrogen bonding interactions with sugar are shown, along with the distances between the hydrogen bonding atoms.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The Glc1Man9GlcNAc2 glycan intermediate formed after cleavage of two glucose residues by alpha -glucosidase I and II from the precursor N-glycan Glc3Man9GlcNAc2 in the ER mediates the interaction of glycoproteins with calreticulin and calnexin. These two lectin chaperones promote the correct folding of their glycoprotein substrates.

The recently solved crystal structure of calnexin shows that its sugar-binding domain has a striking similarity with that of a "legume lectin" fold (40-42). Thus, a wealth of data on the molecular features of carbohydrate recognition by legume lectins helps us to explain in molecular terms the mode of interaction of the saccharides to calreticulin (43-45). In CRT, as in legume lectins, the concave and convex sheets are made of six and seven strands, respectively, whereas the roof region consists of only two strands as compared with five in legume lectins (Fig. 3B). An important finding that comes from the modeling studies is that the presence of a helix behind the convex beta -sheet perhaps shields the hydrophobic regions of the sheet, thus preventing the oligomerization through interactions between the "convex" sheets of the monomers. This in turn explains why CRT, in contrast to the legume lectins, exists as a monomer.

Elucidation of the stoichiometry of interaction of calreticulin with its substrate has been a matter of speculations and debate. The ITC data presented here establish unambiguously that calreticulin-sugar interactions have a stoichiometry of 1 (Fig. 1). Indeed, the recent structural solution of calnexin also reports one site for glucose binding in this molecule, although the low affinity of this ligand and the consequent low occupancy of the chaperone with glucose cannot be ignored at this moment. The extremely low affinity of glucose for calreticulin is not surprising (Kb ~ 60 M-1),2 as the modeling studies do not show any aromatic residue within the striking distance for stacking with the monosaccharide. The importance of the stacking interactions between the hydrophobic beta -face of the pyranose ring of the monosaccharide and the lectins is well known (46). For example, the studies of Sharma and Surolia (47) explicitly noted that the failure of Phaseolus vulgaris lectin to bind to monosaccharides is related to the absence of such a stacking interaction. Indeed, the introduction of an aromatic residue in a P. vulgaris mutant that can stack with the monosaccharide makes up for this deficiency of the native protein (48). The inability of manno-oligosaccharides by themselves to bind shows that glucose at the nonreducing end is necessary for saccharide substrates to bind to calreticulin. An essential requirement of glucose in alpha -1,3 linkage to mannose is supported by modeling studies showing that the equatorially oriented hydroxyl group at C-2 of glucose in the saccharide substrates is making a favorable contribution to the binding process by hydrogen bonding with Asp-317 and Tyr-109 of calreticulin (Table II). The lack of such an interaction between oligosaccharides devoid of alpha -1,3-linked nonreducing end glucose, i.e. as in Manalpha 1-3Man, thus explains the obligatory requirement of glucose in alpha -1,3 linkage for binding to CRT.

The affinity of glucose per se or methyl alpha -glucopyranoside to calreticulin is very poor. However, its extension by mannose in alpha -1,3 linkage increases the binding constant in a striking manner. The extension of this structure by mannose in alpha -1,2 linkage, as in Glucalpha 1-3Manalpha 1-2Manalpha Me and Glucalpha 1-3Manalpha 1-2Manalpha 1-2Manalpha Me, enhances the binding further by 25- and 50-fold, respectively, indicating that the combining site of the chaperone consists of a number of subsites each of which can accommodate a hexapyranosyl residue. As the -Delta G for any of the saccharides equals the sum of the free energies from each subsite filled, the contribution of -Delta G from each subsite of calreticulin is obtained by comparing a pair of saccharides. These values together with the corresponding subsite occupied by the constituent sugar units of the saccharides are shown in Table III. An increase in -Delta G as the successive units of mannose are added supports our suggestion that subsites A-D are contiguous, favorable subsites. Of these subsites, B, C, and D are the strong binding subsites, with subsite C being the strongest, whereas subsite A is a weakly interacting subsite. These interpretations are supported by favorable changes in enthalpies as the size of the oligosaccharides is increased. Thus, subsites C and D contribute -5.0 and -3.14 kcal/mol, respectively, to the enthalpy of binding.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III
Subsite model for calreticulin
The saccharides are arranged in their respective subsites with the reducing end to the right. The contribution of each subsite to the association of an oligosaccharide with calreticulin was calculated by comparing the Delta Gb°, Delta Hb°, and Delta S values for pairs of saccharides that differ by a single sugar residue. It is assumed that an additional sugar residue (italicized) is bound at the subsite listed above.

The decrease in the enthalpy of binding of saccharides with the decrease in their sizes implies more extensive hydrogen bonding and van der Waals interactions for the larger saccharides. This is also borne out by modeling studies, which show a progressive increase in the number of hydrogen bonds and van der Waals interactions from glucose to the tetrasaccharide. As the maximum increment in Delta H occurs for subsite C, it is not surprising to find that the mannosyl residue occupying this subsite is involved in a maximum number of hydrogen bonds. Generally, the hydrogen bond between the charged atom and a hydroxyl group is stronger than that involving a neutral atom (49). A perusal of the model of calreticulin-sugar interaction indeed shows many hydrogen bonds between sugar hydroxyls and the charged atoms of CRT. This explains the greater affinities of CRT-oligosaccharide interactions as compared with other lectin-sugar interactions. In addition to hydrogen bonding, residues Arg-73, Tyr-109, Asp-125, Met-131, Leu-318, and Tyr-319 make hydrophobic interactions with the sugar. Interestingly, the phenyl ring of Trp-319 may possibly make an OH-pi interaction with the third sugar (mannose of Glcalpha 1-3Manalpha 1-2Manalpha 1-2Manalpha Me). The O-4 hydroxyl group of the mannose moiety makes contacts with all of the carbon atoms of the phenyl ring of Trp-319 within a distance ranging from 2.9 to 3.6 Å. OH-pi interactions have been observed only recently in protein structures (50, 51). In the case of protein-sugar interactions, there is only one recent example from our own laboratory (52).

Interestingly, calreticulin-saccharide interactions, unlike most other protein-carbohydrate reactions, show that for the binding of Glcalpha 1-3Manalpha Me and Glcalpha 1-3Manalpha 1-2Manalpha Me, the values of free energies are more negative than those of the enthalpies (44). This indicates the favorable entropic effects for binding, especially for Glcalpha 1-3Manalpha Me. This favorable entropic contribution could reflect the hydrophobic nature of the reaction. This is also borne out by greater burial of the apolar surface as the size of the oligosaccharide increases and is more pronounced for the disaccharide. The burial of the hydrophobic surface area was calculated by subtracting the accessible hydrophobic surface area (calreticulin and sugar) from that of the complex. A value of 122 Å was obtained for the monosaccharide, and it increased to 220 Å for the disaccharide. For the trisaccharide and tetrasaccharide, this value was 233 and 260 Å, respectively. However, as the plot of enthalpy-entropy compensation has a slope of 1.25, enthalpic factors, viz. hydrogen bonding and van der Waals interactions, appear to dominate calreticulin-saccharide interactions as is also attested to by modeling studies. The observation of enthalpy-entropy compensation in calreticulin-saccharide recognition can be explained in two ways (Fig. 2). In one, the release or uptake of water has been explained as the primary source of this compensation (53). Another and perhaps more likely explanation is that a progressively greater portion of the hydrophobic surface gets buried with an increase in the size of ligand. However, this favorable term is countered by the effect of the restriction of the ligand in the combining site; the larger the ligand, the tighter the binding (i.e. more number of interactions), and consequently, the greater the extent of restriction of degrees of freedom and the larger the change in the unfavorable entropy term with increasing ligand size, as observed experimentally.

In conclusion, our calorimetric studies demonstrate that calreticulin has a single binding site for its respective glycan moiety and provide evidence for the interaction of various oligosaccharides with calreticulin, showing that the entire Glcalpha 1-3Manalpha 1-2Manalpha 1-2Man structure of the oligosaccharide is recognized by calreticulin. Our modeling studies demonstrate that an increased number of hydrogen bonds and van der Waals interactions occurs as the size of the oligosaccharide is increased, which supports the observed thermodynamic data.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Prof. Raghavan Varadarajan for the use of the VP-ITC calorimeter.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by grants from the Department of Biotechnology and Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (to A. S.), the Swiss National Science Foundation (to A. H.), and the European Union (Contract No. HPRN-CT-2000-00001 to S. O.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains protocols for synthesis of oligosaccharides.

§ Joint first co-authors.

Present address: Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen CH-5232, Switzerland.

Dagger Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 91-80-3942714; Fax: 91-80-3600535; E-mail: surolia@mbu.iisc.ernet.in.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 2, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc. M209132200

2 M. Kapoor and A. Surolia, unpublished results.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: CRT, calreticulin; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; ITC, isothermal titration calorimetry; PDB, Protein Data Bank; CNS, crystallography NMR software; MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Williams, D. B. (1995) Biochem. Cell Biol. 73, 123-132[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Michalak, M., Milner, R. E., Burns, K., and Opas, M. (1992) Biochem. J. 285, 681-692[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Wada, I., Rindress, D., Cameron, P. H., Ou, W.-J., Doherty, J. J., II, Louvard, D., Bell, A. W., Dignard, D., Thomas, D. Y., and Bergeron, J. J. M. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 19599-19610[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Smith, M. J., and Koch, G. L. E. (1989) EMBO J. 8, 3581-3586[Abstract]
5. Krause, K.-H., and Michalak, M. (1997) Cell 88, 439-443[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Corbett, E. F., Oikawa, K., Francois, P., Tessier, D. C., Kay, C., Bergeron, J. J. M., Thomas, D. Y., Krause, K.-H., and Michalak, M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 6203-6211[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Baksh, S., Burns, K., Andrin, C., and Michalak, M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 31338-31344[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Frickel, Eva-Maria, Riek, R., Jelesarov, I., Helenius, A., Wüthrich, K., and Ellgaard, L. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 1954-1959[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Leach, M. R., Cohen-Doyle, M. F., Thomas, D. Y., and Williams, D. B. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 29686-29697[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Ellgaard, L., Rick, R., Hermann, T., Guntert, P., Braun, D., Helenius, A., and Wuthrich, K. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 3133-3138[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Fliegel, L., Burns, K., MacLennan, D. H., Reithmeier, R. A. F., and Michalak, M. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 21522-21528[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Ostwald, T. J., MacLennan, D. H., and Dorrington, K. J. (1974) J. Biol. Chem. 249, 5867-5871[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Ellgaard, L., Molinari, M., and Helenius, A. (1999) Science 286, 1882-1888[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Spiro, R. G., Zhu, Q., Bhoyroo, V., and Söling, H.-D. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 11588-11594[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Peterson, J. R., Ora, A., Nguyen, Van, P., and Helenius, A. (1995) Mol. Biol. Cell 6, 1173-1184[Abstract]
16. Rodan, A. R., Simons, J. F., Trombetta, E. S., and Helenius, A. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 6921-6930[Abstract]
17. Patil, R. A., Thomas, C. J., and Surolia, A. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 24348-24356[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Schrag, J. D., Bergeron, J. J. M., Li, Y., Borisova, S., Hahn, M., Thomas, D. Y., and Cygler, M. (2001) Mol. Cell 8, 633-644[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Ora, A., and Helenius, A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 26060-26062[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Sousa, M. C., and Parodi, A. J. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 4196-4203[Abstract]
21. Parodi, A. J. (1999) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1462, 287-295
22. Tsai, B., Ye, Y., and Rapoport, T. A. (2002) Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 246-255[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Ware, F., Vassilakos, A., Peterson, P. A., Jackson, M. R., Lehrman, M. A., and Williams, D. B. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 4697-4704[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Hammond, C., Braakman, I., and Helenius, A. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 913-917[Abstract]
25. Kain, R. K., Liu, X.-G., Oruganti, S. R., Chandrasekaran, E. V., and Matta, K. L. (1995) Carbohydr. Res. 271, 185-196[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Cherif, S., Clavel, J.-M., and Monneret, C. (1998) J. Carbohydr. Chem. 17, 1203-1218
27. Cherif, S., Clavel, J.-M., and Monneret, C. (2002) J. Carbohydr. Chem. 21, 123-130[CrossRef]
28. Dubois, M., Gilles, K. A., Hamilton, J. K., Rebers, P. A., and Smith, F. (1956) Anal. Chem. 28, 350-356
29. Peterson, J. R., and Helenius, A. (1999) J. Cell Sci. 112, 2775-2784[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Gill, S. C., and von Hippel, P. H. (1989) Anal. Biochem. 182, 319-326[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Wiseman, T., Williston, S., Brandts, J. F., and Lin, L. N. (1989) Anal. Biochem. 179, 131-137[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. MicroCal. (1998) VP-ITC Microcalorimeter: User's Manual , MicroCal, LLC, Northampton, MA
33. Sali, A., and Blundell, T. L. (1993) J. Mol. Biol. 234, 779-815[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Marti-Renom, M. A., Stuart, A. C., Fiser, A., Sanchez, R., Melo, F., and Sali, A. (2000) Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 29, 291-325[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Pannu, N. S., and Read, R. J. (1996) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 52, 659-668[CrossRef]
36. Brunger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., DeLano, W. L., Gros, P., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Jiang, J. S., Kuszewski, J., Nilges, M., Pannu, N. S., Read, R. J., Rice, L. M., Simonson, T., and Warren, G. L. (1998) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 54, 905-921[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Loss, A., Bunsmann, P., Bohne, A., Loss, A., Schwarzer, E., Lang, E., and von der Lieth, C. W. (2002) Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 405-408[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Vassilakos, A., Michalak, M., Lehrman, M., and Williams, D. B. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 3480-3490[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Lumry, R., and Rajender, S. (1970) Biopolymers 9, 1125-1227[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Ravishankar, R., Thomas, C. J., Suguna, K., Surolia, A., and Vijayan, M. (2001) Proteins 43, 260-270[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Prabu, M. M., Suguna, K., and Vijayan, M. (1999) Proteins 35, 58-69[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Srinivas, V. R., Reddy, G. B., Ahmad, N., Swaminathan, C. P., Mitra, N., and Surolia, A. (2001) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1527, 102-111[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Sharma, V., Vijayan, M., and Surolia, A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 21209-21213[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Dam, T. K., and Brewer, C. F. (2002) Chem. Rev. 102, 387-429[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Surolia, A., Sharon, N., and Schwarz, F. P. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 17697-17703[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Chandra, N. R., Prabu, M. M., Suguna, K., and Vijayan, M. (2001) Protein Eng. 14, 857-866[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Sharma, V., and Surolia, A. (1997) J. Mol. Biol. 267, 433-445[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Hamelryck, T. W., Dao-Thi, M. H., Poortmans, F., Chrispeels, M. J., Wyns, L., and Loris, R. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 20479-22048[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Fersht, A. R., Shi, J. P., Knill-Jones, J., Lowe, D. M., Wilson, A. J., Blow, D. M., Brick, P., Corles, P., Waye, M. M. Y., and Winter, G. (1985) Nature 314, 235-238[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Steiner, T., and Koellner, G. (2001) J. Mol. Biol. 305, 535-557[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Brandl, M., Weiss, M. S., Jabs, A., Suhnel, J., and Hilgenfeld, R. (2001) J. Mol. Biol. 307, 357-377[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52. Jeyaprakash, A. A., Rani, P. G., Reddy, G. B., Banumathi, S., Betzel, C., Sekar, K., Surolia, A., and Vijayan, M. (2002) J. Mol. Biol. 321, 637-645[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Swaminathan, C. P., Surolia, N., and Surolia, A. (1998) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 5153-5159[CrossRef]


Copyright © 2003 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.