Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase-mediated Reduction of Insulin Receptor Substrate-1/2 Protein Expression via Different Mechanisms Contributes to the Insulin-induced Desensitization of Its Signaling Pathways in L6 Muscle Cells*

Luciano PirolaDagger, Stephanie Bonnafous§, Anne M. Johnston, Claire Chaussade, Fiorella Portis, and Emmanuel Van Obberghen||

From INSERM U145, IFR50, Faculté de Médecine, 06107 Nice Cedex 2, France

Received for publication, September 3, 2002, and in revised form, February 11, 2003

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Impaired glucose tolerance precedes type 2 diabetes and is characterized by hyperinsulinemia, which develops to balance peripheral insulin resistance. To gain insight into the deleterious effects of hyperinsulinemia on skeletal muscle, we studied the consequences of prolonged insulin treatment of L6 myoblasts on insulin-dependent signaling pathways. A 24-h long insulin treatment desensitized the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (PKB) and p42/p44 MAPK pathways toward a second stimulation with insulin or insulin-like growth factor-1 and led to decreased insulin-induced glucose uptake. Desensitization was correlated to a reduction in insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-1 and IRS-2 protein levels, which was reversed by the PI3K inhibitor LY294002. Co-treatment of cells with insulin and LY294002, while reducing total IRS-1 phosphorylation, increased its phosphotyrosine content, enhancing IRS-1/PI3K association. PDK1, mTOR, and MAPK inhibitors did not block insulin-induced reduction of IRS-1, suggesting that the PI3K serine-kinase activity causes IRS-1 serine phosphorylation and its commitment to proteasomal degradation. Contrarily, insulin-induced IRS-2 down-regulation occurred via a PI3K/mTOR pathway. Suppression of IRS-1/2 down-regulation by LY294002 rescued the responsiveness of PKB and MAPK toward acute insulin stimulation. Conversely, adenoviral-driven expression of constitutively active PI3K induced an insulin-independent reduction in IRS-1/2 protein levels. IRS-2 appears to be the chief molecule responsible for MAPK and PKB activation by insulin, as knockdown of IRS-2 (but not IRS-1) by RNA interference severely impaired activation of both kinases. In summary, (i) PI3K mediates insulin-induced reduction of IRS-1 by phosphorylating it while a PI3K/mTOR pathway controls insulin-induced reduction of IRS-2, (ii) in L6 cells, IRS-2 is the major adapter molecule linking the insulin receptor to activation of PKB and MAPK, (iii) the mechanism of IRS-1/2 down-regulation is different in L6 cells compared with 3T3-L1 adipocytes. In conclusion, the reduction in IRS proteins via different PI3K-mediated mechanisms contributes to the development of an insulin-resistant state in L6 myoblasts.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Type 2 diabetes is caused by a progressive decrease in insulin action and gradual development of chronic hyperglycemia. Initial peripheral insulin resistance, i.e. the failure of adipose and muscle tissues to properly dispose of circulating glucose, and the failure of liver to control glucose production, is compensated by increased insulin secretion from pancreatic beta -cells, leading to hyperinsulinemia. In the long-term, beta -cell failure to compensate for peripheral insulin resistance leads to type 2 diabetes (1). Hyperinsulinemia, in association with increased circulating levels of fatty acids (2), which exacerbate peripheral insulin resistance, is thought to be a major factor contributing to progression to type 2 diabetes.

Activation of the insulin receptor (IR)1 by hormone binding activates a number of cellular responses such as translocation of the glucose transporter GLUT4 to the plasma membrane in muscle and adipocytes (3), hepatic glycogen synthesis (4), lipogenesis (5), and modulation of gene expression (6).

Insulin signaling is initiated by the recruitment of intracellular molecules to the activated receptor and their ensuing tyrosine phosphorylation. These molecules include IRS-1/2/3/4, Cbl, and the adapter proteins Shc (7). Phosphorylated IRSs then engage the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) p85/p110 heterodimer by binding the SH2 domains of the p85 adapter to specific pYMXM motifs (8). Once captured by IRS, PI3K becomes activated and produces the lipid second messenger phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate, which stimulates the serine/threonine kinase cascade PDK-1-PKB/Akt-p70 S6 kinase (9). PKB/Akt and p70 S6 kinase are downstream kinases central to insulin action (10), the former controlling GLUT4 translocation, glycogen synthesis, and protein synthesis (11), and the latter being a key regulator of the growth promoting action of insulin (12). Other SH2 domain containing proteins, including Grb2, SHP-2, and Nck associate with IRS to mediate insulin responses. In particular, Grb2 links insulin receptor activation to the p42/p44 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade (7).

The occurrence of insulin-induced peripheral insulin resistance has been attributed to impairment of the tyrosine kinase activity of the insulin receptor, based on biochemical studies performed on skeletal muscle biopsies from type 2 diabetic patients (13-15). However, these findings have been disputed by reports showing normal insulin receptor function, despite downstream metabolic abnormalities (16-18). Recently, the elucidation of the signaling pathways emanating from the activated insulin receptor (10, 19) has paved the way for several studies demonstrating that intracellular signaling molecules also substantially contribute to the insulin-resistant phenotype.

IRS-1 protein levels have been shown to be decreased in 3T3-L1 adipocytes chronically exposed to insulin (20). IRS-1 degradation is triggered by serine/threonine phosphorylation, and is blocked by the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 (21, 22). PI3K may control IRS-1 serine/threonine phosphorylation either via the action of downstream serine/threonine kinases, such as mTOR, GSK-3, and atypical protein kinase Cs, which ultimately phosphorylate IRS-1 (23, 24), or by directly phosphorylating IRS-1 via its intrinsic protein kinase activity (25, 26). Once serine/threonine phosphorylated, IRS-1 degradation occurs via the proteasome degradation pathway (27). In keeping with these studies in cultured cells, is the finding that IRS-1 protein expression is reduced in adipocytes from patients with type 2 diabetes (28) as well as in subjects suffering from insulin resistance (29). Recently, proteasome-mediated IRS-2 degradation has also been demonstrated in insulin/IGF-1-treated 3T3-L1 adipocytes, Fao hepatoma cells, and mouse embryo fibroblasts (30).

Downstream of IRS proteins, other insulin signaling molecules have been reported to be deregulated in insulin-induced insulin resistance or type 2 diabetes. PKB activation is decreased in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue from db/db mice as compared with non-diabetic controls (31). GLUT4 expression is lower in insulin-resistant individuals (32), and in L6 myotubes overexpressing the transporter GLUT4, the insulin-induced GLUT4 translocation to the plasma membrane is reduced after sustained exposure to high glucose and insulin (33). Thus, deterioration of the insulin receptor-signaling pathway at different levels accounts for the evolution from an insulin-resistant state to type 2 diabetes.

Here we evaluate the changes in insulin signaling pathways after a prolonged exposure of L6 muscle cells to insulin and we investigate the underlying molecular mechanisms. We demonstrate that, upon prolonged insulin treatment (mimicking hyperinsulinemia), both the PI3K/PKB and the MAPK signaling cascades are down-regulated and cellular levels of the two major insulin receptor docking proteins, IRS-1 and IRS-2, are decreased. Finally, we show that PI3K/PKB and MAPK down-regulation is causally related to the decrease in IRS-1/2, that PI3K is a key upstream molecule controlling IRS-1/2 degradation via different mechanisms, and that IRS-2 appears to be the functionally most relevant adapter in insulin signal transmission in L6 cells.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- Cell culture solutions and supplements, reagents for SDS-PAGE, and Protein A-Sepharose were from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Polyvinylidene difluoride membranes for immunoblotting were from Millipore (Bedford, MA). ECL reagents, [gamma -32P]ATP (> 5000 Ci/mmol), and [32P]orthophosphate were from Amersham Biosciences (Uppsala, Sweden). Recombinant human insulin was from Novo Nordisk (Copenhagen, Denmark). IGF-1 and PDGF beta /beta were from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA). Secondary anti-mouse or anti-rabbit antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase were from Jackson Laboratories (Copenhagen, Denmark). L-alpha -Phosphatidylinositol was from Sigma. TLC silica plates were from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). LY294002, rapamycin, and PD98059 were from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA) and TPCK was from Sigma. Other chemicals were of the highest analytical grade available.

Cell Culture-- Rat L6 myoblasts were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD). L6 were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum (FCS), penicillin, 100 units/ml, and streptomycin, 100 µg/ml (Invitrogen). Cells were seeded in 6-well plates for Western blotting experiments or in 10-cm diameter plates for immunoprecipitation experiments. 24-h insulin treatments were started at 70-80% confluence in serum-free medium.

Immunoblotting, Immunoprecipitations, PI3K Assays, and 2-Deoxyglucose Uptake-- After treatment with insulin or inhibitors, cells were lysed in buffer A (20 mM Tris-HCl, 138 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 5% (v/v) glycerol, 1 mM sodium-o-vanadate, 20 µM leupeptin, 18 µM pepstatin, 1% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, 5 mM EDTA, 20 mM NaF, pH 8.0; 0.4 ml/plate for 6-well plates and 1 ml/plate for 10-cm diameter plates). Lysates were kept on ice for 15 min and the insoluble material was removed by centrifugation at 13,000 × g for 15 min. Protein concentration was determined by the Bio-Rad colorimetric assay (Bio-Rad).

Cell lysates (10 µg of protein) were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to Immobilon-P polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, and blocked in 5% (w/v) bovine serum albumin. Membranes were probed with anti-phospho-Ser-473 PKB (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA), anti-PKB (provided by B. Hemmings, FMI, Basel, Switzerland), anti-phospho-MAPK p42/p44, anti-MAPK p42/p44 (Promega, Madison, WI), anti-IRS-1, anti-IRS-2, 4G10 anti-phosphotyrosine (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY), and anti-IR beta -subunit (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) antibodies. The proteins were detected by ECL after incubation of the membranes with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. Signal intensities were measured with NIH Image after scanning of non-saturated Eastman Kodak Biomax MR-1 films (Sigma).

For immunoprecipitation, lysates were incubated at 4 °C for 30 min with polyclonal antibodies to IRS-1 or to IR beta -subunit, followed by addition of protein A-Sepharose and further incubation for 2 h. Immune complexes were washed twice with buffer A and then solubilized in Laemmli sample buffer. If subjected to a PI3K assay, immune complexes were washed twice with buffer A, twice with 0.1 M Tris-HCl, 0.5 M LiCl, pH 7.4, and twice with lipid kinase buffer (20 mM HEPES, 5 mM MgCl2, pH 7.4) prior to PI3K assay, which was performed on IRS-1 immunoprecipitates as described (26). 2-Deoxyglucose uptake was measured as previously reported (34).

Orthophosphate Metabolic Labeling-- When at 70-80% confluence, L6 myoblasts (one 10-cm diameter plate/condition) were incubated for 24 h in 5 ml of phosphate-free DMEM in the presence of 1 µM insulin and inhibitors as described in figure legends. Cells were labeled for the last 3 h with 0.5 mCi/ml [32P]orthophosphate and IRS-1-associated radioactivity was evaluated in IRS-1 immunoprecipitates by SDS-PAGE separation followed by phosphorimaging of the dried gel.

Generation of Recombinant Adenoviruses-- Adenoviruses expressing p110alpha CAAX and IRS-1 were generated by homologous recombination in Escherichia coli BJ 5183. Co-transformation of E. coli BJ 5183 led to recombination between p110alpha CAAX (wild type and the kinase-dead K802R (35)), IRS-1 (cloned in pCDNA3), and a viral vector recombinogenic with the pCDNA3 cytomegalovirus promoter and poly(A) sequence (VmcDNA, provided by S. Rusconi, University of Fribourg, Switzerland) (36). Recombinants were screened by PCR analysis with a pair of primers that annealed to the viral vector and cytomegalovirus promoter sequence, respectively. A positive clone harboring p110alpha CAAX (wt and KR) and IRS-1 was further amplified in E. coli DH5alpha , digested with PacI, and transfected by the calcium phosphate method into helper 293 cells to produce viral particles. Adenoviruses were purified by ultracentrifugation on CsCl gradient and stored in 0.1 M Tris, 0.25 M NaCl, 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 50% (v/v) glycerol, pH 7.5 at -20 °C. Viral titer of stocks was >108 plaque-forming units/ml.

Northern Blotting and RNA Interference-- Total RNA was extracted from cells using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). 15 µg of RNA were resolved by electrophoresis on a 1.2% agarose-formaldehyde gel. RNA was transferred to a BrightStar-Plus positively charged nylon membrane (Ambion, Austin, TX). Probes were labeled with [alpha -32P]dCTP using a random primer labeling kit (Rediprime kit) and purified with a Probe Quant kit (both from Amersham Biosciences). The probes encompassed the full-length coding regions of GLUT1, PKB, and IRS-1. Hybridization was performed at 68 °C in ExpressHyb hybridization solution (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA), as per the manufacturer's instructions. Blots were exposed for 24 h at -70 °C or visualized by phosphorimaging.

For RNA interference experiments, L6 were grown in DMEM + 10% (v/v) FCS in 24-wells plates. At >60% confluence medium was replaced with 300 µl of DMEM + 5% (v/v) FCS and cells were transfected by the calcium phosphate method with double stranded RNA oligonucleotides at a concentration of 50 nM (Proligo, Dusseldorf, Germany). Briefly, 0.3 µl of 50 µM dsRNA oligonucleotides were mixed with 7.5 µl of water, 7.5 µl of calcium solution (0.5 M CaCl2, 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.0), and 15 µl of phosphate solution (0.075 mM Na2HPO4, 0.075 mM NaH2PO4, 0.28 M NaCl, 0.05 M HEPES, pH 7.0). The mixture was left for 10 min at room temperature to form a precipitate and subsequently added to the cells. Medium was replaced 12-16 h later with DMEM + 5% (v/v) FCS. Prior to insulin treatment, cells were starved overnight in DMEM. In L6, RNA interference (RNAi) occurred after calcium phosphate transfection, but not after transfection with FuGENE or simple addition of short interfering double stranded RNA (siRNA) to the culture medium. DsRNA oligonucleotides used in this study encompassed nucleotides 895-913 and 1180-1198 of the published IRS-1 (X58375) and IRS-2 (XM146235) sequences. Two deoxythymine residues were added 3' to each strand. DsRNAs annealing was done in annealing buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8) by heating the complementary single-stranded RNAs at 90 °C for 2 min followed by slow cooling to <30 °C.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Prolonged Insulin Treatment Desensitizes the PI3K/PKB and MAPK Signaling and Decreases Insulin-induced 2-Deoxyglucose Uptake-- To investigate the alterations in intracellular signaling caused by a prolonged insulin treatment in muscle cells, L6 myoblasts were exposed for 24 h to increasing insulin concentrations, followed or not by a second treatment with 1 µM hormone for 10 min.

To evaluate the activation of the PI3K and the MAPK signaling, IRS-1-associated PI3K activity was assayed in IRS-1 immunoprecipitates, and MAPK activation was evaluated by immunoblotting with antibodies to phospho-MAPK. Responsiveness of both PI3K and MAPK to a 10-min exposure to 1 µM insulin was diminished to a similar extent, and in a dose-dependent manner, in cells subjected to a 24-h insulin pre-treatment (Fig. 1, A and B, empty bars), indicating desensitization of the insulin signaling pathways. On the contrary, whereas an IRS-1-associated PI3K activity could be detected after the 24-h insulin treatment, no residual MAPK activity was present (Fig. 1, A and B, full bars). Thus, insulin chronically activates PI3K at a submaximal level, although MAPK activation is transient and becomes undetectable after 4 h insulin stimulation (data not shown).


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Insulin effect on PI3K and MAPK activities in L6 myoblasts after prolonged exposure to insulin. L6 myoblasts were treated with the indicated concentrations of insulin for 24 h. After 24 h, cells were exposed for 10 min to 1 µM insulin (empty bars) or left untreated (solid bars). A, top: IRS-1 associated PI3K activity was measured in anti-IRS-1 immune complexes using phosphatidylinositol as a substrate (see "Experimental Procedures"; mean ± S.E., n = 3). PI3K activity from cells not pretreated with insulin but exposed for 10 min to 1 µM insulin was taken as a 100%. Bottom, representative anti-p85alpha immunoblot on IRS-1 immunoprecipitates (IP) showing IRS-1-associated PI3K. B, top: MAPK activation was evaluated by immunoblot analysis on cell lysates with antibodies to active MAPK p42/p44. pMAPK signal from cells not chronically treated and exposed for 10 min to 1 µM insulin was taken as a 100% (mean ± S.E., n = 3). Bottom, representative anti-pMAPK and anti-MAPK immunoblots. WB, Western blot.

To determine whether IRS-1-associated PI3K activity relays a downstream signal in intact cells, we next evaluated the activation of PKB by immunoblotting with antibodies to the active form of PKB (Ser-473 PKB). PKB activation paralleled IRS-1-associated PI3K activity under all the conditions tested (Fig. 2, A and B). Likewise, p70 S6 kinase activation showed an activation pattern similar to that of PKB, as judged by insulin-induced band shift (data not shown). A time course evaluation of the decline in insulin responsiveness of PKB and MAPK demonstrated that the down-regulation of both signaling pathways occurred in a time-dependent fashion, with the MAPK signaling being down-regulated more rapidly than PKB (Fig. 2C).


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Activation of PI3K downstream effector PKB, kinetics of PKB and MAPK down-regulation and [3H]2-deoxyglucose uptake after prolonged exposure to insulin. L6 myoblasts were treated for 24 h with increasing insulin concentrations as indicated. After 24 h, cells were exposed for 10 min to 1 µM insulin. PKB activation was evaluated by immunoblot analysis with antibodies to active PKB. [3H]2-Deoxyglucose uptake was measured as described under "Experimental Procedures." A, quantification of PKB activation. Empty bars, 10 min exposure to 1 µM insulin; full bars, no second insulin exposure (mean ± S.E., n = 3). PKB activation from cells not chronically treated and exposed for 10 min to 1 µM insulin was taken as a 100%. B, representative anti-pPKB immunoblot for the data shown in A. C, time course-dependent down-regulation of PKB and MAPK. L6 myoblasts were exposed for 2, 6, and 18 h to increasing insulin concentrations as indicated. Cells were then left untreated or exposed for 10 min to 1 µM insulin. Time-dependent induction of PKB and MAPK down-regulation was visualized by immunoblotting with antibodies to pPKB Ser-473 and pMAPK. Representative immunoblots from three independent experiments are shown. D, [3H]2-deoxyglucose uptake after 10 min exposure to 1 µM insulin is expressed relative to cells not subjected to 10 min exposure to insulin. (Mean ± S.E. is from three independent experiments. In each independent experiment, triplicate measurements yielded a S.E. < 6% of the mean values.)

The correlation between the IRS-1-associated PI3K activity and the PKB, p70 S6 kinase activation levels observed indicates that the IRS-1-associated PI3K activity mirrors the PI3K activity in vivo. Furthermore, a 24-h insulin treatment, although provoking a approx 2-fold increase in glucose uptake, as also shown with higher fold in L6 myotubes (37), lead to a decreased insulin-induced [3H]2-deoxyglucose uptake following an acute insulin treatment. This is shown by the ratio between the glucose uptake measured with and without an acute insulin treatment following the 24-h chronic treatment (Fig. 2D).

Down-regulation of insulin signaling has been proposed to result from alterations in both insulin receptor and postreceptor signaling (38). To evaluate whether the down-regulation observed in PI3K/PKB and MAPK signaling was because of insulin-induced IR degradation we quantified the total amount of IR in starved or 24-h insulin-treated L6 myoblasts by immunoblotting with antibodies to IR. As already reported in myotubes (33), the IR levels and insulin-induced IR tyrosine phosphorylation decreased by ~50% as compared with untreated cells following a 24-h exposure to 1 µM insulin (Fig. 3). Given that low receptor occupancy can be sufficient to relay a biological effect (39), deregulation of intracellular component(s) of the insulin signaling cascade might also contribute to the observed down-regulation.


View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   IR protein level decreases, but its relative tyrosine phosphorylation level is not affected by prolonged insulin treatment. L6 myoblasts were treated for 24 h plus an additional 10 min as indicated. IR immunoprecipitates were analyzed for total receptor content with an antibody to the insulin receptor beta -subunit (upper blot) and for receptor phosphorylation with antibodies to phosphotyrosine (lower blot). Molecular masses are indicated on the right. Representative immunoblots from four independent experiments are shown.

Insulin/IGF-1-treated L6 Cells Retain Responsiveness to Activation by FCS, and PDGF beta /beta Pretreatment Does Not Down-regulate Insulin Signaling-- L6 myoblasts express both insulin and IGF-I receptors with a prevalence of IGF-1 receptors (40). Thus, the insulin receptor mainly exists as a hybrid (alpha beta alpha 'beta ') with the IGF-I receptor. To evaluate whether L6 myoblasts respond similarly to a prolonged insulin or IGF-I pretreatment, cells were stimulated with increasing concentrations of either insulin (0-103 nM range) or IGF-I (0-102 nM range) for 24 h, followed by a 10-min treatment with either 1 µM insulin or 100 nM IGF-I. We observed a down-regulation of PKB and MAPK after prolonged insulin treatment, irrespective of the ligand used for the second exposure (insulin or IGF-1, Fig. 4A). Likewise, a 24-h pretreatment with IGF-1 induced a desensitization of PKB and MAPK when cells were subsequently exposed for a further 10 min to either insulin or IGF-I (Fig. 4B). Given the presence of insulin/IGF-1 hybrid receptors in L6 cells and the responsiveness of IGF-1R to insulin at high concentrations, the 24-h exposure to insulin at the highest concentration (i.e. 103 nM) might lead to PKB and MAPK down-regulation by acting on both receptors. Nevertheless, PKB and MAPK down-regulation was already occurring upon 24 h exposure to 10-102 nM insulin (with no or little interference with IGF-1R activation) and to 1-10 nM IGF-1 (with no or little interference with IR activation, Fig. 4, A and B). Given that (i) down-regulation is already caused by exposure to low insulin/IGF-1 concentrations, and (ii) prolonged exposure to insulin diminishes acute IGF-1 signaling and vice versa, we suggest that a down-regulation event takes place at a postreceptor level.


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   PKB and MAPK are activated by FCS and PDGF but not by insulin/IGF-1 after 24 h of insulin/IGF-1 treatment, although PDGF does not down-regulate insulin signaling. Anti-pPKB and anti-pMAPK immunoblots are shown for the following experimental conditions. A, following a 24-h insulin treatment as indicated, L6 myoblasts were exposed for 10 min to either 1 µM insulin or 0.1 µM IGF-1. B, following a 24-h IGF-1 treatment as indicated, L6 myoblasts were exposed for 10 min to either 1 µM insulin or 0.1 µM IGF-1. C, top, L6 cells were treated for 24 h with the indicated concentrations of insulin, and then exposed for 10 min to either 1 µM insulin or 10% (v/v) FCS. While it activated MAPK, FCS appeared to be ineffective for PKB activation in L6 cells. Bottom, quantification of pMAPK immunoreactivity. D, top: L6 cells were treated with 10 nM PDGF for 24 h followed by a 10-min stimulation with either 1 µM insulin (I) or 10 nM PDGF (P). Bottom, quantification of pMAPK immunoreactivity. Representative immunoblots of at least two independent experiments are shown (mean ± S.E. of pMAPK immunoreactivity was of duplicate immunoblots from two independent experiments). IP, immunoprecipitation; WB, Western blot.

Whereas cross-reactivity occurs between insulin and IGF-1 toward their corresponding receptors, FCS and PDGF are not known to interfere with IR or IGF-1R. Consistent with this, MAPK activation by FCS was sustained after a 24-h insulin pretreatment (Fig. 4C), indicating that, after prolonged insulin/IGF-1 exposure, the PI3K/PDK-1 and Raf-MEK signaling modules remain responsive to treatment by agonists other than insulin/IGF-1. Because PKB and MAPK are targets of virtually all activated receptor-tyrosine kinases, we evaluated whether insulin signaling down-regulation is specifically achieved by insulin/IGF-1 pre-exposure or if it could also be caused by prolonged exposure to an unrelated receptor-tyrosine kinase agonist. When we exposed cells for 24 h to PDGF and subsequently treated acutely with either insulin or PDGF, we observed homologous desensitization of PKB and MAPK (complete and approx 50%, respectively) after PDGF treatment, but no down-regulation of insulin signaling (Fig. 4D). This indicates that down-regulation of insulin signaling strictly depends on a prior perturbation of the proximal insulin/IGF-1 receptor signaling pathway.

Desensitization of Insulin Signaling Is Associated with a PI3K-dependent Decrease in IRS-1 and IRS-2 Protein Levels-- Previous studies on Zucker fatty rats and ob/ob mice, an hyperinsulinemic and insulin-resistant rodent models, respectively, show decreased IRS-1 expression levels in skeletal muscle (41, 42). Likewise, IRS-1 was found to be down-regulated in adipose tissue from diabetic patients (28) and in 3T3-L1 adipocytes treated chronically with insulin (43).

Therefore, we evaluated the protein levels of IRS-1 and IRS-2 in 24-h insulin-treated L6 myoblasts. Both IRS-1 and IRS-2 decreased after a 24-h exposure to insulin in a dose-dependent manner, reaching 30% of untreated controls with 1 µM insulin (Fig. 5, A and B). The decrease in IRS-1 was post-transcriptional, because we did not observe decreased expression of the IRS-1 mRNA after insulin treatment, although GLUT-1 mRNA was induced, confirming the insulin-induced transcriptional effects (Fig. 5C (44)). We also evaluated the protein levels of p42/p44 MAPK and PKB. p42/p44 expression was unaltered by prolonged insulin treatment (Fig. 5A). On the contrary, PKB expression increased up to 2.4-fold in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 5, A and B).


View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   24-h insulin treatment down-regulates IRS-1/IRS-2 and up-regulates PKB expression. A, L6 myoblasts were treated for 24 h with increasing concentrations of insulin as indicated. Total lysates were analyzed for IRS-1, IRS-2, PKB, and MAPK expression. (The dots on the IRS-2 Western blot indicate cross-reactive bands.) B, quantification of the expression of PKB, IRS-1, and IRS-2, 100% refers to the expression level of untreated cells (mean ± S.E., n >=  3). C, Northern blot analysis of total RNA extracted from 24-h insulin-treated L6. IRS-1 mRNA levels are similar, whereas PKB and GLUT-1 mRNA levels are increased by insulin treatment in a dose-dependent manner. Equal loading is visualized by ethidium bromide staining of 18 S and 28 S rRNAs.

Insulin-induced degradation of IRS-1 is mediated by the proteasome degradation pathway (27, 45) following serine/threonine phosphorylation (46). Using pharmacological inhibitors, we attempted to determine which kinase(s) might lead to IRS-1 serine/threonine phosphorylation. Co-treatment of cells with insulin and LY294002 resulted in the inhibition of IRS-1 degradation and in a lowering of its apparent molecular mass, indicating a decreased serine/threonine phosphorylation. Likewise, LY294002 prevented insulin-induced IRS-2 degradation (Fig. 6A). The inhibitory action of LY294002 throughout the 24-h treatment was confirmed by immunoblot analysis with antibodies against active PKB (Fig. 6B). That LY294002 blocks insulin-induced IRS-1 down-regulation indicates that PI3K regulates IRS-1 serine/threonine phosphorylation, either directly, or via activation of downstream kinase(s) and/or inhibition of phosphatases. To assess the role of PI3K-activated kinases in regulating IRS-1 down-regulation, 24-h insulin-stimulated L6 cells were simultaneously treated with the anti-proliferative agent TPCK, which inhibits both PKB and p70 S6 kinase by disrupting PDK1 signaling (47). In contrast to LY294002, TPCK, although inhibiting both PKB and p70 S6 kinase activation (Fig. 6C), was ineffective in blocking insulin-induced IRS-1 down-regulation (Fig. 6C).


View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Differential effects of LY294002, TPCK, rapamycin, and PD98059 on IRS-1 and IRS-2 insulin-induced down-regulation. A, L6 myoblasts were incubated for 24 h with increasing insulin concentrations in the presence of 50 µM LY294002 (+) or 0.1% (v/v) Me2SO (-). IRS-1 and IRS-2 expression levels were evaluated in total cell lysates by immunoblottng with the respective antibodies. B, immunoblotting with antibodies against pPKB confirmed the inhibitory effect of LY294002 on the PI3K/PKB signaling pathway. Cells were incubated for 24 h with insulin and LY294002 as indicated and subjected to a further 10 min stimulation with 1 µM insulin before lysis. C, L6 myoblasts were incubated for 24 h without or with 1 µM insulin in the presence of 0.1% (v/v) Me2SO (-), 5 µM or 17 µM TPCK, 50 µM LY294002 (LY), or 50 nM rapamycin (R) as indicated. The IRS-1 expression level was evaluated by immunoblotting with antibodies to IRS-1. The inhibitory effect of TPCK, LY, and R was verified by band shift analysis of p70 S6 kinase as well as by immunoblotting to pPKB. Equal loading is demonstrated by immunoblotting to total PKB (performed after strip of the immunoblot against the phosphorylated form). D, L6 myoblasts were incubated for 24 h without or with 1 µM insulin in the presence of 0.1% (v/v) Me2SO (-), 50 µM LY294002 (LY), 50 nM rapamycin (R), or 10 µM PD98059 (PD) as indicated. IRS-1 and IRS-2 expression levels were evaluated by immunoblotting of total lysates. The dots indicate cross-reactive bands. The immunoblots shown are representative of at least two independent experiments.

To evaluate the potential role of p42/p44 MAPK and mTOR, which have been reported to phosphorylate IRS-1 (24, 48), we incubated L6 myoblasts with or without 1 µM insulin for 24 h in the presence of either 50 µM LY294002, 50 nM rapamycin or 10 µM PD98059. In the absence of insulin, LY294002, but not rapamycin or PD98059, induced a mobility shift toward a lower apparent molecular mass, indicating that basal IRS-1 phosphorylation is chiefly controlled by PI3K. Moreover, LY294002, but not rapamycin or PD98059, blocked IRS-1 degradation (Fig. 6D). On the contrary, treatment of cells with either LY294002 or rapamycin, irrespective of insulin co-treatment, led to an induction of IRS-2, indicating that a basal activity of the PI3K-mTOR pathway suffices to trigger a constitutive IRS-2 degradation pathway. This observation is in agreement with the work of Simpson et al. (49) who, by overexpressing the phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate 3-phosphatase PTEN in PTEN-null breast cancer cells, observed a feedback up-regulation of IRS-2 mRNA and protein level.

To gain further insight into the kinase(s) involved in insulin-induced IRS-1 degradation, 24-h insulin-treated L6 cells were labeled with [32P]orthophosphate in the presence of the above inhibitors and IRS-1 phosphorylation was quantitated in IRS-1 immunoprecipitates. LY294002 and rapamycin, but not PD98059, induced a decrease in IRS-1 phosphorylation (Fig. 7A, left). Because LY294002 (but not rapamycin) also inhibited the insulin-induced IRS-1 decrease (Fig. 6, A and D) it is PI3K inhibition that yields the maximal inhibitory effect on IRS-1 phosphorylation (Fig. 7A). Moreover, in 24-h insulin-treated L6 cells, LY294002 addition (but not addition of other protein kinase inhibitors nor of MG132, a proteasome inhibitor, see legend to Fig. 7) resulted in increased IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation and increased IRS-1-associated p85alpha (Fig. 7B). Thus, although PI3K inhibition during a 24-h insulin treatment blocks phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate-mediated downstream signaling in L6, the IRS-1·PI3K complex remains potentially active as demonstrated by increased IRS-1/PI3K association, higher IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation, and lower IRS-1 serine/threonine phosphorylation level.


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   In 24-h insulin-treated cells, LY294002 attenuates IRS-1 phosphorylation, increases IRS-1 phosphotyrosine content, and increases IRS-1 associated p85alpha . A, left: IRS-1 was immunoprecipitated from 32P-labeled L6 myoblasts treated for 24 h with insulin in the presence of 0.1% (v/v) Me2SO (-), 50 µM LY294002 (LY), 50 nM rapamycin (R), or 10 µM PD98059 (PD) as indicated. The IRS-1 associated radioactivity was visualized by phosphorimaging after separation with a 7.5% SDS-PAGE. Right, IRS-1 relative phosphorylation was calculated by dividing the incorporated radioactivity by the IRS-1 expression level (C, alpha -IRS-1 immunoblot, lanes 5-8). A result representative of two independent experiments is shown. B, IRS-1 was immunoprecipitated from L6 myoblasts treated with insulin in the presence of 0.1% (v/v) Me2SO (-), 50 µM LY294002 (LY), 50 nM rapamycin (R), 10 µM PD98059 (PD), 200 nM GF109 (GF), or 10 µM MG132 (MG) as indicated. IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation (upper blot) and IRS-1-associated PI3K adapter p85alpha (lower blot) are shown. A representative blot of four independent experiments is shown.

To confirm the role of PI3K in controlling IRS-1/2 down-regulation, L6 myoblasts were infected at increasing multiplicity of infection with adenovirus expressing a constitutively active PI3K catalytic subunit (p110alpha CAAX wt) or, as a control, a kinase-dead mutant (p110alpha CAAX KR, Fig. 8A). Expression of p110alpha CAAX wt (but not KR) activated the PI3K downstream targets PKB (Fig. 8B) and p70 S6 kinase (not shown) (50), and induced a decrease in IRS-1 and IRS-2 protein expression, thus confirming that IRS-1/2 down-regulation can be induced in a receptor-independent manner and is controlled by PI3K.


View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Expression of a catalytically active p110alpha CAAX down-regulates IRS-1 and IRS-2 proteins. A, L6 myoblasts were infected with adenovirus expressing p110alpha CAAX wt and kinase dead (KR). Transcription of the p110alpha CAAX mRNA was visualized by Northern blot. B, L6 myoblasts were incubated overnight in DMEM without serum and with increasing multiplicity of infection of adenovirus expressing p110alpha CAAX wild type (wt) or kinase-dead. The cells were then kept in DMEM, 10% FCS (v/v) for 36 h followed by overnight starvation prior to lysis and immunoblotting with antibodies to IRS-1, IRS-2, and active PKB (phospho-Ser-473) as indicated. The blots shown are representative of two independent experiments. C, quantification of IRS-1 and IRS-2 expression levels in uninfected cells and infected cells infected at a m.o.i. of 100 (mean ± S.E., n = 3).

Insulin-induced Desensitization of the PI3K/PKB and MAPK Pathways Is Reversed by a Blockade of IRS-1/2 Down-regulation-- To demonstrate a direct link between desensitization of insulin signaling upon prolonged exposure to insulin and decreased levels of IRS molecules, L6 myoblasts were exposed for 24 h to insulin in the presence of 50 µM LY294002, thus inhibiting down-regulation of IRS1/2. After 24 h, the inhibitor was removed and the cells were stimulated with 1 µM insulin, as indicated in Fig. 9. A 24-h pretreatment with 103 nM insulin down-regulated PKB and MAPK (Fig. 9, lanes 1-4; see also Figs. 1 and 2). However, PKB could be maximally activated by a 10-min exposure to 1 µM insulin after a 24-h incubation with 102 or 103 nM hormone, provided that LY294002 was added (Fig. 9). Likewise, a transient maximal activation of MAPK could be induced after 24 h treatment with 102 nM insulin and LY294002, and a lower activation could still be observed when 103 nM insulin was administered. The concomitant occurrence of (i) inhibition of IRS-1/2 down-regulation by PI3K inhibition, and (ii) activation of PKB and MAPK by acute insulin stimulation after prolonged insulin/LY294002 treatment, indicates that the desensitization of insulin signaling depends on the decreased protein levels of IRS-1/2 proteins.


View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Inhibition of insulin-induced IRS-1 and IRS-2 down-regulation by LY294002 reverses the inhibitory action of a prolonged insulin treatment on PKB and MAPK activation. L6 myoblasts were incubated for 24 h in the presence of 0, 102, and 103 nM insulin and 50 µM LY294002 as indicated. After 24 h incubation, cells were left untreated or were treated for 10, 30, or 60 min with 1 µM insulin. Prior to exposure to insulin, LY294002 containing medium was replaced with fresh DMEM to allow PI3K/PKB activation. Cell lysates were then subjected to immunoblotting with antibodies against active PKB, active MAPK, IRS-1 and IRS-2. Cell lysates were then subjected to immunoblotting with antibodies against active PKB, active MAPK, IRS-1 and IRS-2.

RNAi-mediated Knockdown Establishes That IRS-2 Is the Major Adapter Accounting for Insulin-induced Desensitization of the PI3K/PKB and MAPK in L6 Cells-- To elucidate the relative contribution that the decrease in IRS-1 versus IRS-2 plays in the down-regulation of insulin signaling, we took advantage of the recently described RNAi approach, whereby a protein can be selectively knocked down by transfection of siRNA (51). Double stranded siRNAs designed to selectively knockdown IRS-1 or IRS-2 in L6 cells reduced their expression level by >80% (Fig. 10B). Insulin stimulation of cells knocked down for IRS-1 led to an activation of PKB and MAPK comparable with that of cells not exposed to siRNA. On the contrary, elimination of IRS-2 rendered both PKB and MAPK almost unresponsive to insulin, indicating that the major adapter molecule linking the activated insulin receptor to downstream PKB and MAPK activation is IRS-2 in L6 cells (Fig. 10A). Because by knockdown of IRS-2, we observed a decrease in IRS-1 levels (Fig. 10B) it could not be ruled out that the impaired activation of PKB and MAPK was because of the concomitant decrease in IRS-1. To test whether physiological levels of IRS-1 may overcome the lack of IRS-2, L6 cells in which RNAi to IRS-2 had been performed were infected at a 10-150 m.o.i. of an adenovirus expressing IRS-1. Under these experimental conditions, IRS-1 expression was restored, with overexpression at the highest multiplicity of infection. However, upon insulin stimulation no rescue of either PKB or MAPK activities was observed (Fig. 10C), indicating that even a fully functional IRS-1 cannot overcome, for these biological responses, the absence of IRS-2 in L6 cells.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   IRS-2 is the adapter accounting for insulin-induced activation of PKB and MAPK in L6 cells. IRS-1, IRS-2, or both were knocked down by RNA interference. RNAi was performed by calcium phosphate transfection of dsRNAs. 24 h post-transfection, cells were starved overnight and treated or not for 10 min with 1 µM insulin as indicated prior to cell lysis. A, cell lysates were then subjected to immunoblotting with antibodies to IRS-1, IRS-2, PKB Ser-473, and active MAPK as indicated. Equal loading is demonstrated by immuno- blotting to total MAPK, total PKB (performed after stripping the immunoblot against the phosphorylated form), and p85alpha PI3K adapter subunit. The blots shown are representative of at least four independent ones. B, quantification of the expression level of IRS-1 (left graph) and IRS-2 (right graph) following RNAi to IRS-1, IRS-2, and IRS-1 + IRS-2. Expression levels with no addition of siRNA is taken as 100% (mean ± S.E., n = 4). C, to assess the relevance of the partial decrease of IRS-1 following RNAi to IRS-2, after knockdown of IRS-2 cells were infected by an adenovirus expressing IRS-1 (Ad IRS-1) at the indicated multiplicity of infection. After overnight starvation, cells were left untreated or treated with 1 µM insulin for 10 min. Immunoblotting with antibodies to IRS-1, IRS-2, PKB phospho-Ser-473, and active MAPK was performed as indicated.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Insulin resistance results from the inability of insulin-responsive tissues to respond properly to the hormone. This state is associated with hyperinsulinemia, and when increased insulin secretion becomes insufficient to maintain glucose homeostasis, chronic hyperglycemia and type 2 diabetes occur.

To investigate the molecular alterations induced by hyperinsulinemia in muscle cells, we treated L6 cells for 24 h with different hormone concentrations followed by a second 10-min acute hormone treatment. These conditions mimic a hyperinsulinemic state, whereby a temporarily increased insulin secretion is superimposed upon an already elevated insulin level.

In this system, PI3K recruitment to IRS-1 and activation of PI3K/PKB and MAPK pathways by acute insulin stimulation were reduced in a dose-dependent manner by the preceding 24-h insulin treatment, with a 50% down-regulation of both pathways at 102 nM hormone pretreatment. The responses of the two pathways to the sole 24-h insulin exposure differed, MAPK activity being absent and the PI3K/PKB activation reaching a submaximal level (30-50% of the maximal insulin-stimulated activity) at all hormone concentrations tested. The 24-h insulin-induced down-regulation of PI3K/PKB resulted in a decreased acute insulin-induced [3H]2-deoxyglucose uptake. This reduction is likely to be because of a defective insulin-induced GLUT4 translocation at the plasma membrane (33).

Given the debate as to whether down-regulation of insulin receptor number and/or reduced kinase activity is responsible for determining the insulin-resistant state (see Introduction), we evaluated the amount and extent of tyrosine phosphorylation of the insulin receptor (Fig. 3). Blotting of immunoprecipitated insulin receptors with antibodies to the receptor demonstrated a reduction of ~50% in both receptor content and receptor tyrosine phosphorylation after a 24-h exposure to insulin. Given that low receptor occupancy and activation can relay a biological signal, we investigated whether intracellular downstream targets might also be involved in the down-regulation of insulin-induced intracellular responses.

L6 cells possess a higher number of IGF-1 receptor molecules than IR molecules (52). Therefore, because of the presence of a high proportion of IR/IGF-1R hybrid receptors, the reciprocal effects of insulin and IGF-1 on PKB and MAPK were tested by prolonged incubation with insulin or IGF-1 followed by a second exposure to either insulin or IGF-1. We observed PKB and MAPK down-regulation after acute IGF-1 or insulin treatment, irrespective of the agonist used in the 24-h pretreatment. This suggests that heterologous desensitization occurs between insulin and IGF-1. On the contrary, FCS could still activate MAPK after a prolonged insulin treatment (Fig. 4C). These observations imply that the PI3K/PKB and MAPK down-regulation depends on a signaling event downstream of, but proximal to, the insulin/IGF-1 receptor.

Several post-receptor defects in insulin resistance have been reported, including proteasome-mediated degradation of IRS-1, decreased IRS-2 mRNA levels, decreased GLUT4 protein expression levels (27, 30, 32, 53), as well as desensitization of IGF-1 and lysophosphatidic acid-mediated MAPK activation via beta -arrestin-1 down-regulation (54). Thus, we tested whether the insulin-induced insulin signaling down-regulation might depend on alterations in the levels of IRS molecules and/or the downstream kinases PKB and MAPK. We observed an insulin-induced down-regulation of IRS protein levels that parallels the down-regulation of PI3K/PKB and MAPK. IRS-1 down-regulation could be blocked by PI3K inhibition with LY294002, but not by PDK1, mTOR, or MAPK inhibition. Of particular interest is the observation that insulin-induced IRS-1 degradation was not blocked by TPCK, an inhibitor of PDK1 action. As PI3K-activated PDK1 phosphorylates and activates several downstream kinases, including PKB, p70 S6 kinase, SGK, RSK, and atypical protein kinase Cs (55), the involvement of these kinases in IRS-1 phosphorylation in L6 cells can be excluded.

In 3T3-L1 adipocytes, proteasome-mediated IRS-1 degradation is controlled by a rapamycin-sensitive pathway (46). On the contrary, in our system as well as in Chinese hamster ovary/IR/IRS-1 cells (45), insulin-induced IRS-1 degradation was not affected by rapamycin, indicating that kinases upstream of mTOR, possibly PI3K itself, or kinases independent of mTOR are required in L6 and Chinese hamster ovary cells to elicit IRS-1 degradation. Similar to IRS-1, IRS-2 levels were decreased upon prolonged insulin treatment in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast to IRS-1 down-regulation, which was only dependent on PI3K, both LY294002 and rapamycin blocked insulin-induced IRS-2 down-regulation. Furthermore, exposure of starving cells to LY294002 or rapamycin induced an increase in the IRS-2 expression level (without affecting IRS-1 expression), thus a basal PI3K activity suffices to mediate IRS-2 down-regulation, via mTOR. Together, the above observations suggest that PI3K is the chief molecule controlling insulin-induced degradation of both IRS-1 and IRS-2. Whereas insulin-dependent regulation of IRS-2 levels occurs in part by transcriptional repression of the IRS-2 gene (56), we found that 32P labeling of insulin-treated L6 cells, in the presence of different inhibitors (LY294002, PD98059, or rapamycin), resulted in a minimal 32P incorporation into IRS-1, yet a higher tyrosine phosphorylation, only in LY294002-treated cells. This indicates that the PI3K serine kinase activity directly phosphorylates IRS-1 on serine/threonine residues, provoking its degradation. In support of this is our observation that immunoprecipitated IRS-1 from insulin-treated L6 is phosphorylated in an in vitro kinase assay in a PI3K-dependent manner.2 On the contrary, although mTOR inhibition caused approximately a 50% reduction in IRS-1 32P incorpozhyration, this was not sufficient to prevent IRS-1 from being degraded, indicating that mTOR-dependent phosphorylation sites do not participate (or do not suffice for) in IRS-1 degradation.

We obtained further confirmation of the involvement of PI3K in IRS-1/2 down-regulation by expressing an agonist-independent, constitutively active PI3K consisting of the catalytic subunit p110alpha fused at its C terminus to the farnesylation signal of H-Ras. This moiety targets the protein to the plasma membrane (p110alpha CAAX), activating it (57). In the absence of insulin, expression of p110alpha CAAX wild type (but not kinase-dead p110alpha CAAX K802R) was sufficient to activate PKB, in a multiplicity of infection-dependent manner and induced a decrease in both IRS-1 and IRS-2 as observed in 3T3-L1 adipocytes (58).

To causally link insulin-induced down-regulation of PI3K/PKB and MAPK pathways and degradation of IRS proteins, we exploited the possibility of blocking insulin-induced IRS degradation by inhibiting PI3K. After a 24-h treatment with insulin in the presence of LY294002, IRS-1 and IRS-2 expression levels were preserved. Subsequent insulin stimulation (in freshly changed medium to remove LY294002 and recover PI3K activation) restored PKB stimulation and greatly improved MAPK responsiveness after the 102 nM insulin treatment. We were unable to significantly regain MAPK activation after 103 nM insulin treatment. This is likely because of the fact that at high concentrations insulin induces a persistent dissociation of the Grb2·SOS complex, which can only be reversed by insulin withdrawal (59) and might also explain the more rapid kinetics of MAPK down-regulation as compared with PKB shown in Fig. 2C. Having demonstrated the involvement IRS-1 and -2 down-regulation we next sought to determine the relative contribution of each isoform by selective RNA interference knockdown of each isoform. Whereas IRS-1 knockdown had no effect on the insulin-stimulated activation of PKB and MAPK, we found that knockdown of IRS-2 induced an almost total loss of insulin activation of PKB and MAPK, thus defining IRS-2 as the chief molecule directing insulin downstream signaling, at least in L6 cells.

In summary, our data indicate that prolonged insulin treatment of L6 muscle cells mimics the effects of hyperinsulinemia, leading to down-regulation of both PI3K/PKB and MAPK signaling pathways and glucose uptake via a decrease in IRS-1/2 docking molecules. We also show that PI3K is the key molecule controlling the decrease in IRS-1/2 as down-regulation of IRS-1/2 is effectively prevented by PI3K inhibition but induced by expression of a constitutively active PI3K. Finally, we provide evidence for the existence of a causal link between PI3K-elicited IRS-1/2 decrease and down-regulation of the PI3K/PKB and MAPK pathways, with a prominent role played by IRS-2 as shown by RNAi experiments. Our data suggest that, in L6 cells, insulin-induced degradation of IRS molecules is driven by distinct mechanisms. Indeed, for IRS-1 a PI3K-dependent pathway, with PI3K itself acting as a IRS-1 serine/threonine kinase, appears to be involved, although IRS-2 degradation is controlled by a PI3K-mTOR-dependent mechanism. Moreover, tissue-specific mechanisms may control IRS degradation, as IRS-1 degradation in adipocytes appears to be mTOR-dependent (46) but mTOR-independent in L6 and Chinese hamster ovary/IR/IRS cells (45). Because degradation of IRS proteins is promoted by serine/threonine phosphorylation (21) and provides a molecular link to insulin resistance (60), it will be of importance to determine next the relative contribution of each serine/threonine kinase among the several proposed, not the least PI3K itself, toward IRS serine/threonine phosphorylation.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank J. Downward for the pcDNA3-myc-p110alpha -CAAX construct, B. Hemmings for antibodies to PKB, and S. Rusconi for the adenoviral vector VmAdCDNA. We thank S. Longnus for critically reading the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by INSERM, Université de Nice-Sophia-Antipolis, la Région PACA, European Community Grant QLGI-CT-1999-00674, EuroDiabetesGene, and QLK3-CT-2000-01038, and Aventis Pharma, Frankfurt, Germany, contract 99206.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Supported by an INSERM "Poste Vert" postdoctoral fellowship and in part by the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale.

§ Supported by European Community Grant QLGI-CT-1999-00674.

Supported by INSERM "Poste Vert" postdoctoral fellowships.

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: vanobbeg@unice.fr.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 18, 2003, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M208984200

2 L. Pirola and S. Bonnafous, unpublished data.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: IR, insulin receptor; IRS, insulin receptor substrate; PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-kinase; TPCK, Nalpha -tosyl-L-phenylalanyl chloromethyl ketone; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; PKB, protein kinase B; IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor 1; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; FCS, fetal calf serum; ds, double stranded; RNAi, RNA interference; siRNA, short interfering double stranded RNA; m.o.i., multiplicity of infection.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Saltiel, A. R. (2001) Cell 104, 517-529[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Kraegen, E. W., Cooney, G. J., Ye, J., and Thompson, A. L. (2001) Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes 109, 516-526[CrossRef]
3. Pessin, J. E., Thurmond, D. C., Elmendorf, J. S., Coker, K. J., and Okada, S. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 2593-2596[Free Full Text]
4. Bollen, M., Keppens, S., and Stalmans, W. (1998) Biochem. J. 336, 19-31[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Kersten, S. (2001) EMBO Rep. 2, 282-286[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. O'Brien, R. M., and Granner, D. K. (1996) Physiol. Rev. 76, 1109-1161[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. White, M. F. (1997) Diabetologia 40 Suppl. 2, S2-S17[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Backer, J. M., Myers, M. G., Jr., Shoelson, S. E., Chin, D. J., Sun, X. J., Miralpeix, M., Hu, P., Margolis, B., Skolnik, E. Y., and Schlessinger, J. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 3469-3479[Abstract]
9. Chan, T. O., Rittenhouse, S. E., and Tsichlis, P. N. (1999) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68, 965-1014[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Alessi, D. R., and Downes, C. P. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1436, 151-164[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Hajduch, E., Alessi, D. R., Hemmings, B. A., and Hundal, H. S. (1998) Diabetes 47, 1006-1013[Abstract]
12. Blume-Jensen, P., and Hunter, T. (2001) Nature 411, 355-365[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Arner, P., Pollare, T., Lithell, H., and Livingston, J. N. (1987) Diabetologia 30, 437-440[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Nolan, J. J., Freidenberg, G., Henry, R., Reichart, D., and Olefsky, J. M. (1994) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 78, 471-477[Abstract]
15. Maegawa, H., Shigeta, Y., Egawa, K., and Kobayashi, M. (1991) Diabetes 40, 815-819[Abstract]
16. Krook, A., Bjornholm, M., Galuska, D., Jiang, X. J., Fahlman, R., Myers, M. G., Jr., Wallberg-Henriksson, H., and Zierath, J. R. (2000) Diabetes 49, 284-292[Abstract]
17. Caro, J. F., Sinha, M. K., Raju, S. M., Ittoop, O., Pories, W. J., Flickinger, E. G., Meelheim, D., and Dohm, G. L. (1987) J. Clin. Invest. 79, 1330-1337[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Klein, H. H., Vestergaard, H., Kotzke, G., and Pedersen, O. (1995) Diabetes 44, 1310-1317[Abstract]
19. Shepherd, P. R., Withers, D. J., and Siddle, K. (1998) Biochem. J. 333, 471-490[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Rice, K. M., Turnbow, M. A., and Garner, C. W. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 190, 961-967[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Pederson, T. M., Kramer, D. L., and Rondinone, C. M. (2001) Diabetes 50, 24-31[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Smith, L. K., Vlahos, C. J., Reddy, K. K., Falck, J. R., and Garner, C. W. (1995) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 113, 73-81[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Eldar-Finkelman, H., and Krebs, E. G. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 9660-9664[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Ozes, O. N., Akca, H., Mayo, L. D., Gustin, J. A., Maehama, T., Dixon, J. E., and Donner, D. B. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 4640-4645[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Tanti, J. F., Gremeaux, T., Van Obberghen, E., and Le Marchand-Brustel, Y. (1994) Biochem. J. 304, 17-21[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Pirola, L., Zvelebil, M. J., Bulgarelli-Leva, G., Van Obberghen, E., Waterfield, M. D., and Wymann, M. P. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 21544-21554[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Sun, X. J., Goldberg, J. L., Qiao, L. Y., and Mitchell, J. J. (1999) Diabetes 48, 1359-1364[Abstract]
28. Rondinone, C. M., Wang, L. M., Lonnroth, P., Wesslau, C., Pierce, J. H., and Smith, U. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 4171-4175[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Carvalho, E., Jansson, P. A., Axelsen, M., Eriksson, J. W., Huang, X., Groop, L., Rondinone, C., Sjostrom, L., and Smith, U. (1999) FASEB J. 13, 2173-2178[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Rui, L., Fisher, T. L., Thomas, J., and White, M. F. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 40362-40367[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Shao, J., Yamashita, H., Qiao, L., and Friedman, J. E. (2000) J. Endocrinol. 167, 107-115[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Carvalho, E., Jansson, P. A., Nagaev, I., Wenthzel, A. M., and Smith, U. (2001) FASEB J. 15, 1101-1103[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Huang, C., Somwar, R., Patel, N., Niu, W., Torok, D., and Klip, A. (2002) Diabetes 51, 2090-2098[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Janez, A., Worrall, D. S., and Olefsky, J. M. (2000) Endocrinology 141, 4657-4663[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Wymann, M. P., Bulgarelli-Leva, G., Zvelebil, M. J., Pirola, L., Vanhaesebroeck, B., Waterfield, M. D., and Panayotou, G. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 1722-1733[Abstract]
36. He, T. C., Zhou, S., da Costa, L. T., Yu, J., Kinzler, K. W., and Vogelstein, B. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 2509-2514[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Somwar, R., Sweeney, G., Ramlal, T., and Klip, A. (1998) Clin. Ther. 20, 125-140[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Heydrick, S. J., Jullien, D., Gautier, N., Tanti, J. F., Giorgetti, S., Van Obberghen, E., and Le Marchand-Brustel, Y. (1993) J. Clin. Invest. 91, 1358-1366[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Trischitta, V., Wong, K. Y., Brunetti, A., Scalisi, R., Vigneri, R., and Goldfine, I. D. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 5041-5046[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Beguinot, F., Kahn, C. R., Moses, A. C., and Smith, R. J. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 15892-15898[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Saad, M. J., Araki, E., Miralpeix, M., Rothenberg, P. L., White, M. F., and Kahn, C. R. (1992) J. Clin. Invest. 90, 1839-1849[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Anai, M., Funaki, M., Ogihara, T., Terasaki, J., Inukai, K., Katagiri, H., Fukushima, Y., Yazaki, Y., Kikuchi, M., Oka, Y., and Asano, T. (1998) Diabetes 47, 13-23[Abstract]
43. Ricort, J. M., Tanti, J. F., Van Obberghen, E., and Le Marchand-Brustel, Y. (1995) Diabetologia 38, 1148-1156[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Barthel, A., Okino, S. T., Liao, J., Nakatani, K., Li, J., Whitlock, J. P., Jr., and Roth, R. A. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 20281-20286[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Zhande, R., Mitchell, J. J., Wu, J., and Sun, X. J. (2002) Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 1016-1026[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Haruta, T., Uno, T., Kawahara, J., Takano, A., Egawa, K., Sharma, P. M., Olefsky, J. M., and Kobayashi, M. (2000) Mol. Endocrinol. 14, 783-794[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Ballif, B. A., Shimamura, A., Pae, E., and Blenis, J. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 12466-12475[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. De Fea, K., and Roth, R. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 31400-31406[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Simpson, L., Li, J., Liaw, D., Hennessy, I., Oliner, J., Christians, F., and Parsons, R. (2001) Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 3947-3958[Abstract/Free Full Text]
50. Klippel, A., Reinhard, C., Kavanaugh, W. M., Apell, G., Escobedo, M. A., and Williams, L. T. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 4117-4127[Abstract]
51. Elbashir, S. M., Harborth, J., Lendeckel, W., Yalcin, A., Weber, K., and Tuschl, T. (2001) Nature 411, 494-498[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52. Lamphere, L., and Lienhard, G. E. (1992) Endocrinology 131, 2196-2202[Abstract]
53. Shimomura, I., Matsuda, M., Hammer, R. E., Bashmakov, Y., Brown, M. S., and Goldstein, J. L. (2000) Mol. Cell 6, 77-86[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Dalle, S., Imamura, T., Rose, D. W., Worrall, D. S., Ugi, S., Hupfeld, C. J., and Olefsky, J. M. (2002) Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 6272-6285[Abstract/Free Full Text]
55. Storz, P., and Toker, A. (2002) Front. Biosci. 7, 886-902
56. Zhang, J., Ou, J., Bashmakov, Y., Horton, J. D., Brown, M. S., and Goldstein, J. L. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 3756-3761[Abstract/Free Full Text]
57. Khwaja, A., Rodriguez-Viciana, P., Wennstrom, S., Warne, P. H., and Downward, J. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 2783-2793[Abstract/Free Full Text]
58. Egawa, K., Nakashima, N., Sharma, P. M., Maegawa, H., Nagai, Y., Kashiwagi, A., Kikkawa, R., and Olefsky, J. M. (2000) Endocrinology 141, 1930-1935[Abstract/Free Full Text]
59. Fucini, R. V., Okada, S., and Pessin, J. E. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 18651-18658[Abstract/Free Full Text]
60. Zick, Y. (2001) Trends Cell Biol. 11, 437-441[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2003 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.