Stearoyl-CoA Desaturase Inhibits ATP-binding Cassette Transporter A1-mediated Cholesterol Efflux and Modulates Membrane Domain Structure*

Yu SunDagger , Mingming Hao§, Yi LuoDagger , Chien-ping LiangDagger , David L. SilverDagger , Celina ChengDagger , Frederick R. Maxfield§, and Alan R. TallDagger ||

From the Dagger  Division of Molecular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032 and the § Department of Biochemistry, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York 10021

Received for publication, August 23, 2002, and in revised form, December 12, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Liver X receptor/retinoid X receptor (LXR/RXR) transcription factors have been found to induce a number of genes involved in the regulation of cellular cholesterol efflux, including the ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1), which mediates the active efflux of cellular cholesterol and phospholipids to extracellular acceptors, such as apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I). In a screen for macrophage LXR/RXR target genes, we identified stearoyl-CoA desaturases 1 and 2 (Scd1 and Scd2), and subsequently tested the hypothesis that SCD activity might modulate cellular cholesterol efflux. In HEK 293 cells co-transfection of ABCA1 with either SCD1 or SCD2 inhibited ABCA1-mediated cholesterol efflux but not phospholipid efflux. In Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells with moderate stable overexpression of SCD1, cholesterol efflux to apoA-I was inhibited by 73%, whereas phospholipid efflux and ABCA1 protein levels were unchanged. In contrast, cholesterol efflux to HDL2, which is not dependent on ABCA1, was increased 2-fold in CHO-SCD1 cells. The effect of SCD on cholesterol efflux to apoA-I was independent of acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT) activity. SCD activity led to an increased content of plasma membrane monounsaturated fatty acids (18:1) at the expense of saturated fatty acids (18:0). As shown by confocal microscopy, SCD overexpression led to a decrease of Triton X-100-resistant domains in the plasma membrane, indicating a decrease in membrane-ordered regions. The data suggest that SCD changes membrane organization and depletes a specific pool of membrane cholesterol supporting ABCA1-mediated efflux, whereas increasing availability of cholesterol for passive efflux by HDL2. ABCA1-mediated cholesterol and phospholipid efflux may be uncoupled in pathological states associated with high SCD activity, as in hyperinsulinemic obese mice, or in animals treated with LXR activators.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cellular cholesterol efflux is central to the anti-atherogenic role of HDL1 and its apolipoproteins (1). Cholesterol efflux can involve several different pathways, including an active efflux to lipid-poor apolipoproteins mediated by ABCA1, and passive pathways mediated by diffusion through the aqueous medium or the binding of HDL to its receptor, scavenger receptor BI (SR-BI) (2, 3). Recent studies have identified ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) as the mutant gene in patients with Tangier disease (4-6). The accumulation of cholesterol esters in the macrophages of Tangier disease patients indicates the key role of ABCA1 in mediating cellular cholesterol efflux. ABCA1 facilitates cholesterol and phospholipid efflux to extracellular lipid-poor apolipoproteins in liver, macrophages, and other tissues, initiating the formation of HDL (7, 8). Studies in Tangier disease patients and mouse models of ABCA1 overexpression or ablation suggest that ABCA1 has a protective role against atherosclerosis (9-13).

ABCA1 gene and protein expression are highly regulated on several different levels. Cholesterol efflux to apoA-I is increased in cells loaded with cholesterol (14). Cholesterol loading induces ABCA1 gene transcription, as a result of oxysterol activation of LXR (LXRalpha , LXRbeta ) that forms heterodimers with retinoid X receptor (RXR) on a direct repeat 4 element in the promoter of the ABCA1 gene (15). Emerging evidence suggests that ABCA1 is also regulated on a post-transcriptional level. Wang et al. (16) showed that polyunsaturated fatty acids reduced cellular ABCA1 protein content by enhancing ABCA1 degradation. In contrast, apoA-I and apoA-II stabilized ABCA1 protein without changing the mRNA, as a result of decreased degradation by thiol proteases (17).

The ability of ABCA1 to mediate cholesterol efflux is also modulated by trafficking and compartmentalization of cholesterol in cells. Overexpression of SR-BI in cells inhibits cholesterol efflux by the ABCA1 pathway, either by sequestering cholesterol in the membrane, or by promoting reuptake of newly effluxed cholesterol (18). In macrophages lipoprotein cholesterol deposited in late endosomes/lysosomes acts as a preferential source of cholesterol for ABCA1-mediated efflux (19). In these studies LXR/RXR activation increased cholesterol efflux to apoA-I, but the magnitude of the change was much less than the increase in ABCA1 protein levels. This finding raised the possibility that there might be other LXR/RXR target genes that could act to oppose ABCA1-mediated cholesterol efflux. In this study, we identified the LXR/RXR target gene, stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD), as an inhibitor of ABCA1-mediated cholesterol efflux.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell Culture-- All cells were grown at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator. Tissue culture reagents were from Invitrogen. All cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Transient and stable transfections were performed with LipofectAMINE 2000 (Invitrogen). The CHO-SCD1 cell line was established by transfecting CHO cells with pcDNA3.1/Hygro-mSCD1. Hygromycin-resistant clones were pooled for experiments. Thioglycollate-elicited mouse peritoneal macrophages were collected as described (19). 22(R)-Hydroxycholesterol and the synthetic LXR activator TO-901317 were purchased from Sigma. 9-cis-Retinoic acid was purchased from Biomol.

Subtractive Hybridization-- Selective subtractive hybridization was performed as described (20). Poly(A)+ mRNA (2 µg) was made from treated or untreated thioglycollate-elicited mouse peritoneal macrophages. Selective subtractive hybridization was performed with a PCR-select cDNA subtraction kit (Clontech) according to the manufacturer's recommendations with modifications (20). The subtracted cDNA libraries were generated by inserting the cDNA obtained after hybridization and PCR amplification into a cloning vector pCRII-TOPO (Invitrogen). Individual clones were sequenced.

Northern Blot Analysis-- Total RNA was extracted from macrophage using RNAzol (Tel-Test, Inc.). For Northern analysis, total RNA was separated on 1% agarose-formaldehyde gels (30 µg of RNA per lane), and transferred to Zeta-probe GT membranes (Bio-Rad). The membranes were hybridized with randomly primed 32P-labeled probes of cDNA fragments overnight at 65 °C, and washed twice each for about 15 min at 65 °C with 0.2% SDS in 0.2× SSC. The membranes were then exposed to storage a phosphorimaging screen (Amersham Biosciences) to detect signals.

Quantitative Real Time PCR-- RNA was treated with DNase I (DNA-freeTM; Ambion, Inc). First strand cDNA was synthesized from 5 µg of DNase I-treated total RNA with oligo(dT) primers using Superscriptase II (Invitrogen). cDNA from 6 individual samples was pooled for each condition for real time PCR analysis. Real time PCR was performed in triplicate and analyzed by using the MX4000 system (Stratagene).

Lipoproteins and Apolipoprotein-- High density lipoprotein 2 (HDL2, 1.063 < d < 1.125 g/ml) was isolated from plasma by sequential ultracentrifugation using an L8 ultracentrifuge (Beckman). Apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) was purchased from Biodesign International (Saco, ME).

[3H]Cholesterol Labeling of Cells-- Cells were labeled with [3H]cholesterol by two different methods (1). The first method was 5 mM methyl-beta -cyclodextrin labeling. Cells were labeled with 1 µCi/ml [1,2-3H]cholesterol (PerkinElmer Life Science) in DMEM containing 5 mM methyl-beta -cyclodextrin:cholesterol at a molar ratio of 8:1 for 15 min at 37 °C. After washing, cells were equilibrated in DMEM, 0.2% BSA for 30 min and then used for efflux experiments (2). The second method was with 10% FBS/DMEM. Cells were labeled with 1 µCi/ml [3H]cholesterol in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS for 24 h. The cells were then equilibrated in DMEM, 0.2% BSA for 2 h and then used for cholesterol efflux experiments. In experiments with the acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT) inhibitor, Dup128, the compound was present for 24 h before efflux at a concentration of 100 nM and during the efflux period. To test the efficiency of Dup128 at 100 nM, we labeled CHO and CHO-SCD1 cells with 1 µCi/ml [3H]cholesterol in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS for 24 h in the presence or absence of 100 nM Dup128. The cells were then equilibrated in DMEM, 0.2% BSA overnight. Cellular lipids were extracted with hexane:isopropyl alcohol (3:2) three times and the organic phase was collected, evaporated under N2, and fractionated by TLC using hexane:ethyl ether:methanol:acetic acid (85:15:1:1). Spots corresponding to free cholesterol and cholesterol ester were collected and counted by liquid scintillation. The radiolabeled cholesterol ester:free cholesterol ratio in mock treated cells was 0.04 (CHO) and 0.12 (CHO-SCD1). In Dup128-treated cells, the cholesterol ester:free cholesterol ratio was decreased to 0.006 (CHO) and 0.009 (CHO-SCD1).

Cholesterol Efflux-- After labeling and equilibration, the cells were incubated with 10 µg/ml purified human apoA-I or 15 µg/ml human HDL2 in DMEM, 0.2% BSA for the indicated time. Then medium was collected and centrifuged at 6000 × g for 10 min to remove cell debris and cholesterol crystals. The cells were lysed in 0.1 M sodium hydroxide, 0.1% SDS and radioactivity was determined by liquid scintillation counting.

Phospholipid Efflux-- Cells were labeled for 24 h in DMEM, 10% FBS supplemented with 1.0 µCi/ml [3H]choline (PerkinElmer Life Sciences). After 2 h equilibration in DMEM, 0.2% BSA, the cells were washed and efflux was performed in DMEM, 0.2% BSA containing 10 µg/ml apoA-I. Both medium and cell lysates were extracted with hexane:isopropyl alcohol (3:2) three times and the organic phase was used to determine radioactivity. Efflux was expressed as the percentage of radioactivity in the medium relative to the total radioactivity in cells and medium.

Media Transfer-- As described before (21) the donor cells were incubated with 10 mM methyl-beta -cyclodextrin for 30 min, medium was changed to DMEM, 0.2% BSA containing 10 µg/ml apoA-I. 4 h later this conditioned medium was transferred to [3H]cholesterol-labeled recipient cells for the efflux assay. The efflux was performed in recipient cells for 4 h.

Immunoblots-- Postnuclear lysates were fractionated in 7.5 or 4-15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and transferred to 0.2-µm nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad). Polyclonal anti-ABCA1 and anti-SR-BI antibodies were purchased from Novus (Littlton, CO). Monoclonal anti-actin antibody was purchased from Sigma. Polyclonal anti-SCD antibodies were developed in a rabbit using a peptide corresponding to C-terminal 14 amino acids of SCD protein. This region is highly conserved among human SCD and mouse SCD1 and SCD2.

Cellular Lipid Mass-- Confluent cells were lysed in 0.1 M sodium hydroxide and 0.1% SDS. The lysates were passed through a 21-gauge needle five times, and analyzed for protein by the Lowry method. Cellular lipids were extracted with hexane:isopropyl alcohol (3:2) three times. The organic phases were combined and dried under N2. The residue was dissolved in 0.5% Triton X-100. Cholesterol and phosphatidylcholine were determined enzymatically (Wako Chemicals USA, Richmond, VA).

Membrane Fatty Acid Composition-- Plasma membrane was isolated by nitrocellulose-treated DEAE-Sephadex beads as described (22). Lipids were extracted from the beads and methyl-esterified and quantified by gas-liquid chromatography (23).

Cold Triton Extractability and Confocal Microscopy-- Cold Triton X-100 extractability of surface-bound DiI C18 incorporated into the plasma membrane of various cell lines was performed as described (24). Cells were transferred from growth medium to Medium 1 (150 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 2 g/liter glucose, and 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.4). Lipid analogs were transferred as monomers from fatty acid-free BSA carriers (25). Cells were double labeled with C6-NBD-SM (fluid preferring) and DiI C18 (ordered preferring) at 37 °C for 20 s, washed with ice-cold Medium 1, and extracted with 1% Triton X-100 on ice for 30 min. Confocal microscopy was performed using an Axiovert 100M inverted microscope equipped with an LSM 510 laser scanning unit and a 63X1.4 NA plan Apochromat objective (Carl Zeiss, Inc.). Cells labeled with DiI C18 were excited with a 1.0-milliwatt helium/neon laser emitting at 543 nm, and a 560-nm long pass filter was used for collecting emissions; C6-NBD-SM was excited with a 25-milliwatt argon laser emitting at 488 nm and a 505-530 band-pass filter was used for emissions. To minimize cross-talk, the two channels were scanned alternately in a line-by-line fashion, having only one laser line and one detector channel on at each time. For quantification, cells were treated as described above, with the exception of replacing 1% Triton X-100 with Medium 1 for control cells, and imaged on a Leica DMIRB wide-field microscope (Leica Mikroscopie und Systeme GmbH, Germany) equipped with a cooled CCD camera (Frame Transfer MicroMAX camera with a 512 × 512 back-thinned EEV chip, number 512BFT; Princeton Instruments) driven by Image-1/MetaMorph Imaging System software (Universal Imaging Corp., Wester Chester, PA). Images were acquired using a ×25 oil immersion objective (0.75 NA) to include a large number of cells in one field and to acquire fluorescence from the entire cell thickness. DiI C18 was imaged using a standard rhodamine filter set. Images were first background corrected (26), and then quantified by manually outlining each cell and taking the average fluorescence power associated with the cells. The ratio of average intensities obtained from the control and extracted cells of each cell line was determined as the percentage remaining cell associated.

Statistical Analysis-- Cholesterol and phospholipid efflux were expressed as the percentage of the radioactivity in the medium relative to the total radioactivity in cells and medium. Data shown are the average of at least three independent experiments with triplicates in each experiment unless specified otherwise. Data are expressed as mean ± S.D. The tests for the significant differences between groups were performed by Student's t test.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Stearoyl-CoA Desaturase Is Induced by LXR/RXR in Macrophages-- In an attempt to identify genes that modulate the cholesterol efflux pathway, we carried out selective subtractive hybridization on mouse peritoneal macrophages treated with or without LXR/RXR activators, 22(R)-OH cholesterol (5 µM) and 9-cis-retinoic acid (10 µM). Among the genes induced by this treatment, we identified stearoyl-CoA desaturase 2 (Scd2), and this was confirmed by Northern blot analysis (Fig. 1A). Consistent with these observations, the related hepatic Scd1 is induced in animals treated with LXR ligand (27). Scd1 and Scd2, expressed in an overlapping tissue distribution, catalyze the conversion of stearoyl-CoA to oleoyl-CoA and thereby regulate the ratio of monounsaturated to saturated fatty acids in cell membrane phospholipids (28). Quantitative real time PCR showed that both Scd1 and Scd2 are expressed in mouse peritoneal macrophages (11.7 and 35.4% of actin, respectively), and both were induced by treatment of macrophages with the synthetic LXR activator TO-901317 (1 µM) (Fig. 1B).


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   SCD mRNA and protein expression. A, peritoneal macrophages were isolated from C57BL/6 mice and plated in 6-well plates. Cells were treated with the indicated agents for 24 h. Total RNA was extracted and 30 µg was loaded in each lane. 22(R)HC, 22(R)-hydroxycholesterol (5 µM); 9-cis-RA, 9-cis-retinoic acid (10 µM). B, macrophages treated with the synthetic LXR ligand TO-901317 (1 µM). cDNA from 6 individually treated wells was pooled for quantitative real time PCR. The values are the mean ± S.D. (from triplicates). C, total postnuclear lysates from HEK-293 cells transfected with the indicated plasmids were used to test SCD antibody. The membrane was also blotted with anti-FLAG M2 antibody (middle panel). D-F, SCD protein levels as detected by Western blot using a polyclonal antibody recognizing the C terminus of SCD. D, SCD expression in mouse peritoneal macrophages with or without LXR activation. Mouse peritoneal macrophages were treated with 5 µM 22(R)-hydroxycholesterol and 10 µM 9-cis-retinoic acid for 24 h. Postnuclear lysates were made and 75 µg of protein was loaded to each lane. E, SCD expression in wild type and ob/ob mouse liver postnuclear lysates. F, SCD expression in CHO and CHO-SCD1 cells.

To evaluate SCD protein levels, we developed a specific SCD antibody using a peptide recognizing a common region in SCD1 and SCD2. As shown in 293 cells transfected with either SCD1 or SCD2, the antibody provided specific recognition of SCD1 and SCD2 protein, with no signal in control cells (Fig. 1C). In macrophages treated with LXR/RXR activators, there was a 5-fold induction of SCD protein (the combined signal from SCD1 and SCD2) (Fig. 1D). SCD activity is increased in the liver in ob/ob mice (29), and in transgenic mice overexpressing sterol responsive element-binding protein (SREBP)-1. Using our SCD antibody, we showed 2-3-fold increase in SCD protein in liver of ob/ob mice compared with wild type controls (Fig. 1E), but no change in protein levels in mouse peritoneal macrophages (not shown).

SCD1 and SCD2 Specifically Inhibit ABCA1-mediated Cholesterol Efflux-- We next carried out experiments to evaluate the effects of increased SCD levels on cellular cholesterol efflux. Transient co-expression of either SCD1 or SCD2 with ABCA1 in 293 cells resulted in a significant inhibition of cholesterol efflux to apoA-I (Fig. 2A). In contrast, phospholipid efflux to apoA-I was slightly increased in cells expressing ABCA1 and either SCD1 or SCD2 (data not shown).


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   SCD 1 and SCD2 inhibit cholesterol efflux to apoA-I. A, HEK-293 cells were plated in 24-well plates and transiently transfected with the indicated plasmid constructs. Cells were labeled with [3H]cholesterol, 10% FBS for 24 h and equilibrated in DMEM, 0.2% BSA. Efflux was performed to 10 µg/ml apoA-I in DMEM, 0.2% for 20 h. *, p < 0.05 compared with cells transfected with ABCA1 alone. B, CHO and CHO-SCD1 were labeled with [3H]cholesterol, 10% FBS for 24 h and equilibrated in DMEM, 0.2% BSA. Efflux was performed to 10 µg/ml apoA-I in DMEM, 0.2% for 4 h. *, p < 0.05 compared with control CHO cells. Cholesterol efflux is [3H]cholesterol radioactivity in the medium divided by total radioactivity (cells plus medium) × 100. The values are the mean ± S.D.

To further assess the role of SCD in modulating cellular cholesterol efflux, we developed CHO cell lines with stable expression of SCD1 (CHO-SCD1), and carried out cholesterol efflux experiments using a pool of clones. The CHO-SCD1 cells showed a moderate 4-fold increase in SCD protein expression (Fig. 1F), comparable with the relative SCD protein overexpression observed in macrophages treated with LXR/RXR activators, and in liver in ob/ob mice, compared with wild type mice (Fig. 1). Cholesterol efflux to apoA-I was decreased by 40% in CHO-SCD1 cells compared with control CHO cells (Fig. 2B).

In these experiments, cells were labeled by 24 h incubation with [3H]cholesterol:FBS. In contrast, when cells were labeled by brief exposure to cyclodextrin, [3H]cholesterol (30), there was a more pronounced 73% decrease in cholesterol efflux to apoA-I in CHO-SCD1 cells compared with control CHO cells (Fig. 3A). Time course experiments showed that the effect of SCD was observed throughout the 4-h efflux period (Fig. 3B). In contrast to cholesterol efflux, phospholipid efflux was slightly increased in CHO-SCD1 cells (Fig. 3C) and ABCA1 protein levels were identical in CHO and CHO-SCD1 cells (Fig. 3D).


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   SCD1 inhibits cholesterol efflux to apoA-I without affecting phospholipid efflux or ABCA1 protein level. Cells used for cholesterol efflux measurements (A and B) were labeled with [3H]cholesterol/cyclodextrin·cholesterol (8:1) complexes for 15 min. After equilibration in DMEM, 0.2% BSA, efflux was performed using 10 µg/ml apoA-I in DMEM, 0.2% BSA. Cholesterol efflux is [3H]cholesterol radioactivity in the medium divided by total radioactivity (cells plus medium) × 100. A, cholesterol efflux after 4 h incubation with apoA-I; B, the time course of cholesterol efflux; C, phospholipid efflux (4 h). For both cholesterol and phospholipid efflux, the values are the mean ± S.D. *, p < 0.05 compared with CHO cells. D, immunoblot of ABCA1 following SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of cell lysates (n = 4). X-ray film was scanned by densitometry, and relative intensities of bands were determined by ImageQuant.

In contrast to these findings, cholesterol efflux to HDL2, which is independent of ABCA1 (21), was increased 2-fold in CHO-SCD1 cells (Fig. 4A), and the effect was observed over a wide range of HDL concentrations (Fig. 4B). Cholesterol efflux to HDL can occur by passive diffusion (3) and can be facilitated by SR-BI (2). SR-BI protein levels were identical in control and SCD overexpressing cells (Fig. 4A, inset). Moreover, incubation of CHO cells with SR-BI neutralizing antibody showed only minor effects on cholesterol efflux, reflecting the low level of SR-BI protein in this cell type (2). Thus, SCD overexpression results in an increase in passive cholesterol efflux to HDL2, which is independent of ABCA1 and SR-BI.


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   SCD1 increases cholesterol efflux to HDL2. Cells were labeled with [3H]cholesterol/cyclodextrin·cholesterol (8:1) complexes for 15 min. Efflux was performed to 15 µg/ml (A) or the indicated amounts (B) of HDL2 in DMEM, 0.2% BSA for 4 h after equilibration in DMEM, 0.2% BSA. Cholesterol efflux is expressed as the percentage of total [3H]cholesterol radioactivity (cells plus medium) recovered in medium. The values are the mean ± S.D. *, p < 0.05 compared with CHO cells. The inset shows a Western blot of SR-BI.

Mechanisms Underlying Inhibition of ABCA1-mediated Lipid Efflux by SCD-- Increased SCD activity is known to enhance cellular ACAT activity and apoA-I promotes cholesterol efflux from an ACAT-accessible pool (31, 32). Thus, we tested if an ACAT inhibitor would reverse the effect of SCD. However, at concentrations shown to be effective in inhibiting cellular cholesterol esterification (see "Materials and Methods") the specific ACAT inhibitor, Dup128, did not alleviate the inhibitory effect of SCD on apoA-I-mediated cholesterol efflux (Fig. 5).


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   ACAT inhibitor does not reverse the effect of SCD1. Cells were labeled with [3H]cholesterol/cyclodextrin·cholesterol (8:1) complexes for 15 min. Dup128 (100 nM) or dimethyl sulfoxide were added to cells 24 h before efflux. Efflux was performed to 10 µg/ml apoA-I in DMEM, 0.2% BSA for 4 h after equilibration in DMEM, 0.2% BSA. Open bar, CHO cells; closed bar, CHO-SCD1 cells. *, p < 0.05 compared with CHO cells in same treatment.

We next considered that in cells expressing SCD, ABCA1 might generate phospholipid·apoA-I complexes with a lower capacity to accept membrane cholesterol. To evaluate this possibility we conducted a media transfer experiment. Media containing complexes from control or SCD1 expressing CHO cells were transferred to a second set of cells (control or SCD1 expressing). These experiments showed that inhibition of cholesterol efflux was primarily a characteristic of cells expressing SCD1, and not of the media obtained from SCD1 expressing cells (Fig. 6).


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Inhibitory effect of SCD1 on cholesterol efflux is a feature of cells expressing SCD. Media transfer experiments were performed as described under "Materials and Methods." The donor cells were depleted of cholesterol by incubating with 10 mM methyl-beta -cyclodextrin for 30 min. Then the medium was changed to DMEM, 0.2% BSA containing 10 µg/ml apoA-I and was incubated for 4 h. This conditioned medium was transferred to [3H]cholesterol-labeled recipient cells for the efflux assay. The recipient cells were labeled with [3H]cholesterol, 10% FBS for 24 h and equilibrated in DMEM, 0.2% BSA. Efflux was performed for 4 h in conditioned medium, or to 10 µg/ml apoA-I in DMEM, 0.2% BSA as a control (first two bars). Open bar, CHO cell; closed bar, CHO-SCD1 cells. *, p < 0.05 compared with CHO cells in same treatment.

The effects of SCD were less pronounced in cells subjected to a prolonged labeling procedure with FBS, [3H]cholesterol, compared with the rapid cyclodextrin labeling procedure (cf. Fig. 3 with Figs. 2 and 6). These results suggested that changes in plasma membrane composition or organization might be responsible for the effects of SCD. Cellular lipid measurements did not show any major differences in total cholesterol, free cholesterol, cholesterol ester, or phosphatidylcholine levels in control or SCD1 overexpressing cells (Table I). However, in SCD1 expressing cells there was a 71% increase in 18:1 to 18:0 ratio in plasma membrane phospholipid fatty acids (Table II). This -fold change in phospholipid fatty acids is comparable with that occurring in ob/ob liver compared with wild type liver (29).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Lipid composition of CHO cells and CHO-SCD cells
Lipids from CHO and CHO-SCD cells were extracted and measured as described under "Materials and Methods." The values are expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 5). TC, total cholesterol; FC, free cholesterol; CE, cholesterol ester; PC, phosphatidylcholine.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Fatty acid composition of plasma membrane in CHO and CHO-SCD cells
Plasma membranes were prepared as described under "Materials and Methods." Fatty acids were methyl esterified and determined by gas chromatography.

Cholesterol-enriched membrane regions, known as liquid ordered domains or "rafts" (33), are formed from sphingolipids and glycolipids (34). Such regions are insoluble in Triton X-100. A new technique involving confocal microscopy of cells containing a fluorescent phospholipid marker (24) indicates that the major portion of plasma membrane is in the liquid ordered state, as shown by resistance to cold Triton X-100 extraction, whereas a minor part consists of Triton X-100-soluble regions. We considered the possibility that SCD might change the overall organization of the plasma membrane. The presence of liquid-ordered domains was assessed by confocal microscopy, where we observed the incorporation of the fluorescent phospholipid analog DiI C18:0 into the plasma membrane of intact cells (Fig. 7). In control cells, treatment with Triton X-100 resulted in the appearance of a small number of holes in the plasma membrane, indicating that in intact cells the major portion of the membrane is resistant to Triton X-100 (Fig. 7A), as reported (24). In CHO-SCD1 cells, there was a dramatic increase in the formation of Triton X-100-soluble regions, resulting in a "Swiss cheese" appearance (Fig. 7B). Thus, in SCD expressing cells liquid domains are increased, whereas liquid-ordered domains are decreased. Like the majority of plasma membrane proteins, ABCA1 has been reported to be present in Triton-soluble regions (24). Using antibodies against ABCA1-FLAG, we showed that the plasma membrane signal was abolished by treatment with cold Triton X-100, consistent with localization of ABCA1 in Triton-soluble regions (not shown) (35).


View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Cold Triton extractability of DiI C18 is increased in SCD1 expressing cells. Cold Triton extraction experiments were performed as described under "Materials and Methods" in CHO (A), CHO-SCD1 (B), CHO-SR-BI (C), and CHO-SCD1/SR-BI (D) cells. Briefly, cells were first labeled with DiI C18 at 37 °C for 20 s, washed, and extracted with 1% Triton X-100 on ice for 30 min. Confocal microscopy was done as described under "Materials and Methods." Bar, 10 µm. E, percentage of DiI C18 fluorescence remaining with cells after Triton X-100 extraction. The fluorescent intensities of cells (before or after extraction) were quantified by manually outlining each cell and taking the average fluorescence power associated with the cells. The data are presented as a ratio of fluorescence between extracted and control cells.

Scavenger receptor BI inhibits ABCA1-mediated cholesterol efflux (18), possibly as a result of direct binding of cholesterol to SR-BI or the re-uptake of effluxed cholesterol via SR-BI. SR-BI has been localized to Triton X-100-insoluble membrane regions (36). However, in CHO cells or CHO-SCD1 cells overexpressing SR-BI, there was no significant change in the formation of membrane liquid-ordered regions. SCD1 and SR-BI overexpression resulted in a comparable inhibition of cholesterol efflux, and in cells overexpressing both SCD1 and SR-BI the inhibition of cholesterol efflux was additive, indicating that SCD and SR-BI inhibit efflux by different mechanisms (Fig. 8).


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   SCD1 and SR-BI additively inhibit cholesterol efflux to apoA-I. Cells were labeled with [3H]cholesterol, 10% FBS for 24 h and equilibrated in DMEM, 0.2% BSA. Efflux was performed to 10 µg/ml apoA-I in DMEM, 0.2% for 4 h. *, p < 0.01 compared with control CHO cells. #, p < 0.05 compared with CHO-SCD1/SR-BI cells.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In a screen for LXR target genes, we identified macrophage Scd1 and Scd2, similar to the earlier findings with hepatic Scd1 (37). To test the hypothesis that SCD might decrease cholesterol efflux mediated by ABCA1, we overexpressed SCD1 and SCD2 in 293 cells, and SCD1 in CHO cells, and showed a selective defect in ABCA1-mediated cholesterol efflux to apoA-I. The levels of overexpression of SCD1 protein were comparable with those induced by LXR/RXR activation, or by leptin deficiency in ob/ob mice. These findings suggest that SCD may be an important modulator of ABCA1-mediated cholesterol efflux in animals treated with LXR activators, or in different physiological states involving up-regulation of SCD. Mechanistic studies reveal that SCD alters plasma membrane phospholipid fatty acid composition and organization, decreasing the availability of cholesterol for efflux to apoA-I. In contrast, cholesterol efflux to HDL2 is increased by SCD1 overexpression, indicating a clear difference in availability of cholesterol efflux in the ABCA1 and passive diffusion pathways.

Cholesterol efflux to apoA-I and HDL are mediated by different pathways. Plasma HDL promotes cholesterol efflux through passive aqueous diffusion. This process may be SR-BI-dependent or -independent (3). This process is bidirectional and depends on a cholesterol concentration gradient between cell and lipoproteins (38). In this process, cholesterol must desorb from the lipid-water interface of plasma membrane before diffusing to and adsorbing into HDL, and the desorption step is rate-limiting. Lund-Katz et al. (39) showed that cholesterol desorbs more rapidly from unsaturated phosphatidylcholine bilayers than from saturated phosphatidylcholine bilayer because of greater Van der Waals attraction in the latter system. This may explain why cholesterol efflux to HDL2 is increased in CHO-SCD1 cells. Because SR-BI expression is unchanged by SCD, it is most likely the cholesterol desorption step that is enhanced in SCD1 expressing cells. The effects of SCD could explain our previous finding that LXR/RXR activation increased cholesterol efflux to HDL2 in mouse peritoneal macrophages (19), i.e. SCD expression was induced, resulting in increased efflux to HDL2.

Our experiments add to the growing body of evidence that ABCA1-mediated phospholipid efflux can be dissociated from cholesterol efflux (21, 40, 41), and provide the first clear evidence showing that these processes may become uncoupled under physiological conditions. One interpretation of the dissociation of cholesterol from phospholipid efflux is that ABCA1 mediates lipid efflux in a two-step process, with initial formation of a phospholipid·apoA-I complex by ABCA1, followed by diffusion or insertion of cholesterol from a distinct cholesterol-enriched membrane microdomain. Our results could indicate decreased availability of cholesterol in membrane liquid-ordered domains and could be taken to support this model. However, the kinetics of phospholipid and cholesterol efflux are consistent with ABCA1 mediating coordinated efflux of cholesterol and phospholipid, possibly as a result of the formation of cholesterol-enriched microdomains contiguous with ABCA1 that are then solubilized by ABCA1-bound apolipoprotein (42). Moreover, ABCA1 is localized to membrane Triton X-100-soluble regions and mediates cholesterol efflux preferentially from these regions (Ref. 35, and this study). Thus, we favor an alternative interpretation that less cholesterol is available for efflux in the expanded Triton X-100-soluble domains containing ABCA1.

Because SCD activity is highly regulated, our findings provide the first evidence to suggest that ABCA1-mediated phospholipid and cholesterol efflux may sometimes be uncoupled in vivo. Under these circumstances formation of phospholipid-rich nascent HDL in hepatocytes could induce cholesterol efflux from other cells or tissues in a paracrine or endocrine fashion. Markedly increased SCD activity occurs in association with increased SREBP1 activity in the liver, as seen in SREBP1 transgenic mice (43), with fasting-refeeding (44) or in association with insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia (29). Our data suggest that nascent HDL particles formed at the surface of hepatocytes by ABCA1 and apoA-I in insulin-resistant states (e.g. in ob/ob mice or in human metabolic syndrome) might be phospholipid-rich and cholesterol-poor. Such HDL particles would have an increased capacity to absorb cholesterol in the bloodstream, or in peripheral tissues from macrophage foam cells. Conversely, the decreased efflux of hepatic cholesterol via ABCA1 could lead to cholesterol accumulation in hepatocytes, possibly leading to increased cholesterol esterification or excretion into bile. Our observation that moderate changes in SCD substantially change membrane domain organization also raises the possibility that many different functions attributed to membrane liquid-ordered regions or rafts, such as nitric-oxide synthase activity (45), could be altered by changes in SCD expression.

In cells overexpressing SCD, ABCA1 protein is maintained and phospholipid efflux is slightly increased. This is different to the effects of the addition of exogenous fatty acids to cells (16). Thus, Wang and Oram (16) found that unsaturated fatty acids inhibited ABCA1-mediated phospholipid and cholesterol efflux by accelerating ABCA1 protein degradation. Our results also contrast with the inhibition of LXR-mediated gene transcription by exogenous polyunsaturated fatty acids (46). SCD overexpression led to increased incorporation of monounsaturated fatty acids into cellular phospholipids, whereas polyunsaturated fatty acids were unchanged (Table II). Endogenous and exogenous fatty acids function differently because of different cellular compartmentalization (31). SCD promotes formation of fatty acyl-CoAs that are readily incorporated into membrane phospholipids, whereas this may not be the case for exogenously added unsaturated fatty acids.

LXR activators have emerged as therapeutic targets in the treatment of atherosclerosis (47). Our results indicate that the simultaneous up-regulation of ABCA1 and SCD by these treatments will have opposing effects on apoA-I-mediated cholesterol efflux. This may explain why such agents appear to have relatively modest effects on cholesterol efflux, despite marked up-regulation of ABCA1 (19). Because part of the increased expression of SCD likely results from an LXR-mediated increase in SREBP1c that in turn acts on the SCD promoter, LXR agonists that are selective for the ABCA1 promoter but not the SREBP1c promoter, would be predicted to have more favorable effects on macrophage cholesterol efflux via the ABCA1 apolipoprotein pathway, in addition to the benefit of not causing hypertriglyceridemia or fatty liver (29). Recently, mice deficient in SCD1 were shown to be resistant to dietary and genetic obesity (48, 49), suggesting that SCD inhibitors could be useful in the treatment of obesity. As noted above, inhibition of SCD activity in the liver is likely to have complex effects on cholesterol homeostasis and centripetal cholesterol transport. However, our results suggest that inhibition of SCD in the macrophage is likely to result in increased cholesterol efflux via the ABCA1 pathway and thus could be anti-atherogenic.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Dr. Toru Seo for help in plasma membrane separation.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants HL 22682 (to A. R. T.) and DK27083 (to F. R. M.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Current address: Pharmacia, 800 N. Lindbergh Blvd., T207W, St. Louis, MO 63141.

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 212-305-9418; Fax: 212-305-5052; E-mail: art1@columbia.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 12, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M208687200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: HDL, high density lipoprotein; ABCA1, ATP binding cassette transporter A1; apo, apolipoprotein; SCD, stearoyl-CoA desaturase; ACAT, acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase; SR-BI, scavenger receptor BI; LXR, liver X receptor; RXR, retinoid X receptor; SREBP, sterol regulatory element-binding protein; C6-NBD-SM, N-((6-(7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl)amino)hexanoyl)sphingosylphosphocholine; DiI, dialkylindocarbocyanine; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; FBS, fetal bovine serum; BSA, bovine serum albumin.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Tall, A. R., Costet, P., and Wang, N. (2002) J. Clin. Invest. 110, 899-904[Free Full Text]
2. Ji, Y., Jian, B., Wang, N., Sun, Y., Moya, M. L., Phillips, M. C., Rothblat, G. H., Swaney, J. B., and Tall, A. R. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 20982-20985[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Rothblat, G. H., de la Llera-Moya, M., Atger, V., Kellner-Weibel, G., Williams, D. L., and Phillips, M. C. (1999) J. Lipid Res. 40, 781-796[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Brooks-Wilson, A., Marcil, M., Clee, S. M., Zhang, L. H., Roomp, K., van Dam, M., Yu, L., Brewer, C., Collins, J. A., Molhuizen, H. O., Loubser, O., Ouelette, B. F., Fichter, K., Ashbourne-Excoffon, K. J., Sensen, C. W., Scherer, S., Mott, S., Denis, M., Martindale, D., Frohlich, J., Morgan, K., Koop, B., Pimstone, S., Kastelein, J. J., Hayden, M. R., and Genest, J. (1999) Nat. Genet. 22, 336-345[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Bodzioch, M., Orso, E., Klucken, J., Langmann, T., Bottcher, A., Diederich, W., Drobnik, W., Barlage, S., Buchler, C., Porsch-Ozcurumez, M., Kaminski, W. E., Hahmann, H. W., Oette, K., Rothe, G., Aslanidis, C., Lackner, K. J., and Schmitz, G. (1999) Nat. Genet. 22, 347-351[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Rust, S., Rosier, M., Funke, H., Real, J., Amoura, Z., Piette, J. C., Deleuze, J. F., Brewer, H. B., Duverger, N., Denefle, P., and Assmann, G. (1999) Nat. Genet. 22, 352-355[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Oram, J. F., Lawn, R. M., Garvin, M. R., and Wade, D. P. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 34508-34511[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Wang, N., Silver, D. L., Costet, P., and Tall, A. R. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 33053-33058[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Singaraja, R. R., Fievet, C., Castro, G., James, E. R., Hennuyer, N., Clee, S. M., Bissada, N., Choy, J. C., Fruchart, J. C., McManus, B. M., Staels, B., and Hayden, M. R. (2002) J. Clin. Invest. 110, 35-42[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Clee, S. M., Kastelein, J. J., van Dam, M., Marcil, M., Roomp, K., Zwarts, K. Y., Collins, J. A., Roelants, R., Tamasawa, N., Stulc, T., Suda, T., Ceska, R., Boucher, B., Rondeau, C., DeSouich, C., Brooks-Wilson, A., Molhuizen, H. O., Frohlich, J., Genest, J., Jr., and Hayden, M. R. (2000) J. Clin. Invest. 106, 1263-1270[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Aiello, R. J., Brees, D., Bourassa, P. A., Royer, L., Lindsey, S., Coskran, T., Haghpassand, M., and Francone, O. L. (2002) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 22, 630-637[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. van Eck, M., Bos, I. S., Kaminski, W. E., Orso, E., Rothe, G., Twisk, J., Bottcher, A., Van Amersfoort, E. S., Christiansen-Weber, T. A., Fung-Leung, W. P., Van Berkel, T. J., and Schmitz, G. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 6298-6303[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Joyce, C. W., Amar, M. J., Lambert, G., Vaisman, B. L., Paigen, B., Najib-Fruchart, J., Hoyt, R. F., Jr., Neufeld, E. D., Remaley, A. T., Fredrickson, D. S., Brewer, H. B., Jr., and Santamarina-Fojo, S. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 407-412[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Oram, J. F., and Yokoyama, S. (1996) J. Lipid Res. 37, 2473-2491[Abstract]
15. Costet, P., Luo, Y., Wang, N., and Tall, A. R. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 28240-28245[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Wang, Y., and Oram, J. F. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 5692-5697[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Arakawa, R., and Yokoyama, S. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 22426-22429[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Chen, W., Silver, D. L., Smith, J. D., and Tall, A. R. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 30794-30800[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Chen, W., Sun, Y., Welch, C., Gorelik, A., Leventhal, A. R., Tabas, I., and Tall, A. R. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 43564-43569[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Liang, C. P., and Tall, A. R. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 49066-49076[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Wang, N., Silver, D. L., Thiele, C., and Tall, A. R. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 23742-23747[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Seo, T., Velez-Carrasco, W., Qi, K., Hall, M., Worgall, T. S., Johnson, R. A., and Deckelbaum, R. J. (2002) Biochemistry 41, 7885-7894[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Lepage, G., and Roy, C. C. (1986) J. Lipid Res. 27, 114-120[Abstract]
24. Hao, M., Mukherjee, S., and Maxfield, F. R. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 13072-13077[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Mukherjee, S., Soe, T. T., and Maxfield, F. R. (1999) J. Cell Biol. 144, 1271-1284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Hao, M., and Maxfield, F. R. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 15279-15286[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Schultz, J. R., Tu, H., Luk, A., Repa, J. J., Medina, J. C., Li, L., Schwendner, S., Wang, S., Thoolen, M., Mangelsdorf, D. J., Lustig, K. D., and Shan, B. (2000) Genes Dev. 14, 2831-2838[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Enoch, H. G., Catala, A., and Strittmatter, P. (1976) J. Biol. Chem. 251, 5095-5103[Abstract]
29. Shimomura, I., Bashmakov, Y., and Horton, J. D. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 30028-30032[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Yancey, P. G., Rodrigueza, W. V., Kilsdonk, E. P. C., Stoudt, G. W., Johnson, W. J., Phillips, M. C., and Rothblat, G. H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 16026-16034[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Miyazaki, M., Kim, Y. C., Gray-Keller, M. P., Attie, A. D., and Ntambi, J. M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 30132-30138[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Francis, G. A., Knopp, R. H., and Oram, J. F. (1995) J. Clin. Invest. 96, 78-87[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Simons, K., and Ikonen, E. (1997) Nature 387, 569-572[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. London, E., and Brown, D. A. (2000) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1508, 182-195[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Mendez, A. J., Lin, G., Wade, D. P., Lawn, R. M., and Oram, J. F. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 3158-3166[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Babitt, J., Trigatti, B., Rigotti, A., Smart, E. J., Anderson, R. G., Xu, S., and Krieger, M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 13242-13249[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Repa, J. J., Liang, G., Ou, J., Bashmakov, Y., Lobaccaro, J. M., Shimomura, I., Shan, B., Brown, M. S., Goldstein, J. L., and Mangelsdorf, D. J. (2000) Genes Dev. 14, 2819-2830[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Phillips, M. C., Johnson, W. J., and Rothblat, G. H. (1987) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 906, 223-276[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Lund-Katz, S., Laboda, H. M., McLean, L. R., and Phillips, M. C. (1988) Biochemistry 27, 3416-3423[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Li, Q., Tsujita, M., and Yokoyama, S. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 12045-12052[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Fielding, P. E., Nagao, K., Hakamata, H., Chimini, G., and Fielding, C. J. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 14113-14120[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Gillotte-Taylor, K., Nickel, M., Johnson, W. J., Francone, O. L., Holvoet, P., Lund-Katz, S., Rothblat, G. H., and Phillips, M. C. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 11811-11820[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Shimomura, I., Shimano, H., Korn, B. S., Bashmakov, Y., and Horton, J. D. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 35299-35306[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Oshino, N., and Sato, R. (1972) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 149, 369-377[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Simons, K., and Ehehalt, R. (2002) J. Clin. Invest. 110, 597-603[Free Full Text]
46. Ou, J., Tu, H., Shan, B., Luk, A., DeBose-Boyd, R. A., Bashmakov, Y., Goldstein, J. L., and Brown, M. S. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 6027-6032[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Joseph, S. B., McKilligin, E., Pei, L., Watson, M. A., Collins, A. R., Laffitte, B. A., Chen, M., Noh, G., Goodman, J., Hagger, G. N., Tran, J., Tippin, T. K., Wang, X., Lusis, A. J., Hsueh, W. A., Law, R. E., Collins, J. L., Willson, T. M., and Tontonoz, P. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 7604-7609[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Cohen, P., Miyazaki, M., Socci, N. D., Hagge-Greenberg, A., Liedtke, W., Soukas, A. A., Sharma, R., Hudgins, L. C., Ntambi, J. M., and Friedman, J. M. (2002) Science 297, 240-243[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Ntambi, J. M., Miyazaki, M., Stoehr, J. P., Lan, H., Kendziorski, C. M., Yandell, B. S., Song, Y., Cohen, P., Friedman, J. M., and Attie, A. D. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 11482-11486[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2003 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.