Localization and Characterization of the Inhibitory Ca2+-binding Site of Physarum polycephalum Myosin II*

László Farkas {ddagger}, András Málnási-Csizmadia {ddagger}, Akio Nakamura §, Kazuhiro Kohama § and László Nyitray {ddagger} 

From the {ddagger}Department of Biochemistry, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest 1117, Hungary and §Department of Pharmacology, Gunma University School of Medicine, Maebashi, Gunma 371, Japan

Received for publication, April 22, 2003


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
A myosin II is thought to be the driving force of the fast cytoplasmic streaming in the plasmodium of Physarum polycephalum. This regulated myosin, unique among conventional myosins, is inhibited by direct Ca2+ binding. Here we report that Ca2+ binds to the first EF-hand of the essential light chain (ELC) subunit of Physarum myosin. Flow dialysis experiments of wild-type and mutant light chains and the regulatory domain revealed a single binding site that shows moderate specificity for Ca2+. The regulatory light chain, in contrast to regulatory light chains of higher eukaryotes, is unable to bind divalent cations. Although the Ca2+-binding loop of ELC has a canonical sequence, replacement of glutamic acid to alanine in the –z coordinating position only slightly decreased the Ca2+ affinity of the site, suggesting that the Ca2+ coordination is different from classical EF-hands; namely, the specific "closed-to-open" conformational transition does not occur in the ELC in response to Ca2+. Ca2+- and Mg2+-dependent conformational changes in the microenvironment of the binding site were detected by fluorescence experiments. Transient kinetic experiments showed that the displacement of Mg2+ by Ca2+ is faster than the change in direction of cytoplasmic streaming; therefore, we conclude that Ca2+ inhibition could operate in physiological conditions. By comparing the Physarum Ca2+ site with the well studied Ca2+ switch of scallop myosin, we surmise that despite the opposite effect of Ca2+ binding on the motor activity, the two conventional myosins could have a common structural basis for Ca2+ regulation.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Myosins constitute a diverse superfamily of motor proteins providing the driving force in muscle contraction and many forms of actin-based cellular motility. They are typically constructed of three functional domains, which are the motor domain, the neck or light chain binding domain, and a unique tail region that in many myosins forms a coiled-coil dimer. The heavy chain segment in the neck region consists of repeats of {alpha}-helical sequences called IQ motifs, each of which binds and is stabilized by one light chain subunit. In conventional myosins (myosin II class) the regulatory light chain (RLC)1 and ELC bind to two tandem IQs, whereas in non-conventional myosins CaM and/or CaM-like proteins bind to one to six tandem IQ motifs (1). Because the neck region is involved in the regulation of many myosins, it is often referred to as the regulatory domain (RD). The light chains belong to the EF-hand family of Ca2+-binding proteins, including CaM, the ubiquitous eukaryotic Ca2+ sensor. CaM has four Ca2+-binding sites, a pair of EF-hands in both the N- and C-terminal domains (lobes); however, most of the divalent cation-binding sites of ELC and RLC have been lost during evolution (2).

Enzymatic and motor activity in the myosin superfamily can be controlled by a variety of mechanisms and regulatory systems associated with either the actin filament or the myosin molecule. Regulation through the RD can be achieved by reversible phosphorylation or direct Ca2+ binding. Vertebrate smooth muscle and non-muscle myosin IIs are activated by phosphorylation of the RLC by a Ca2+/CaM-dependent myosin light chain kinase (3). In the animal kingdom the Mollusca conventional myosins are unique in that they are activated by direct Ca2+ binding to the ELC (4). In the lower eukaryote Physarum polycephalum, in contrast to any other known conventional myosins, increase in Ca2+ concentration inhibits the activity of myosin (5, 6). The diverse classes of unconventional myosins are also regulated in part by the interaction of Ca2+ with the CaM subunits; the consequences of the Ca2+ binding can be more complex and are not as well understood as in the myosin II class. Elevated Ca2+ concentration has, in general, an inhibitory effect on the motility of vertebrate myosin I and myosin V as well as the plant-specific myosins (79).

Structural studies of the isolated RD (a three-chain complex of ELC, RLC, and a ~10-kDa fragment of the heavy chain) of scallop myosin II revealed that the triggering Ca2+-binding site is localized in the first EF-hand of ELC (10, 11). The conformation of the N-terminal domain of ELC containing the bound Ca2+ is closed rather than open, which is found in the conventional Ca2+-saturated EF-hands. RLC of scallop and all the known higher eukaryotic myosin II contains a divalent metal-binding site in the first EF-hand that preferentially binds Mg2+ and has only a structural role (10, 11).

Cytoplasmic streaming in plasmodia of the myxomycete P. polycephalum is exceedingly vigorous. The cytoplasm streams at a rate about 1.3 mm/s and changes direction every 2–3 min. This oscillatory process is regulated by Ca2+ and is thought to be driven by a conventional myosin (12). Ca2+ regulates the contractile system of Physarum plasmodia by direct binding to the myosin, and inhibiting its ATPase activity and in vitro motility (5, 6). It was proposed that the ELC is the Ca2+-binding subunit of Physarum myosin (1315). Other mechanisms could also be involved in the regulation or modulation of the activity of the myosin. Phosphorylation of the heavy chain and RLC by heavy chain and light chain kinases, respectively, increases the affinity of myosin to actin; activity of the kinases is suppressed by Ca2+; however, at high actin concentrations existing in vivo in the plasmodium, phosphorylation has a negligible effect on regulation of myosin (6). A caldesmon-like actin-binding protein can stimulate the ATPase activity of myosin. This effect is inhibited by Ca2+-CaM (16, 17).

To compare the structural basis of the two, oppositely regulated Ca2+-binding conventional myosins, we initiated studies to localize and characterize the regulatory calcium-binding site of Physarum myosin using recombinant LCs and RD. The results reveal that there is one Ca2+-binding site per head in the myosin. By mutating all of the EF-hands, which were predicted to be competent metal-binding sites based on sequence analysis, we demonstrate that the first EF-hand of the ELC is responsible for Ca2+ binding. Moreover, our results suggest that the N-terminal domain of ELC remains in a closed conformation even in the presence of Ca2+.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Wild-type and Mutant Expression Constructs—Total RNA from P. polycephalum plasmodia (strain Ng-1) was obtained by the acidguanidium-phenol-chloroform method (18). Purification of RNA and cDNA synthesis was performed as reported earlier (19). cDNAs encoding the RLC and the heavy chain were cloned by PCR using degenerate oligonucleotides designed on the basis of partial peptide sequencing of the isolated myosin subunits and conserved regions within the myosin motor domain (GenBankTM accession numbers AB076705 [GenBank] and AF335500 [GenBank] ). Details of the cloning procedure will be published elsewhere. Dictyostelium ELC was cloned by PCR based on published sequence (GenBankTM accession number X54161 [GenBank] ) using total RNA isolated from AX2 cell line. The cDNAs of RLC, ELC, the N- and C-terminal domains of ELC (residues 1–77 and 73–147), the HC fragment of the RD (residues 771–841), and Dictyostelium ELC were subcloned into the expression vectors pET15b or pET21a (Novagen) between the NdeI and BamHI sites. Restriction sites for cloning of the cDNA fragments were introduced by PCR. The pET15b constructs contain an N-terminal fusion His6-tag sequence. To produce RD, an expression vector was constructed containing sequences of all the three chains with three separate promoters. The pET15b/HC construct was digested with restriction enzymes BglII and BamHI, and the resulting 370-bp fragment containing the sequence of the T7 promoter and the HC fragment of RD was inserted into the unique BamHI site of pET21a/ELC construct. In a similar way, a third sequence cassette containing the RLC-coding sequence together with the T7 promoter was subcloned from pET21a/RLC into the BamHI sites of pET21a/ELC vector. In the three-insert construct, only the HC fragment is fused to a His6-tag sequence. Site-directed mutagenesis of ELC was performed by PCR using the megaprimer method with the following oligonucleotides: E26A, GTCCATAGAGGCCTTGGGCAGTGCCC; D15A and D17A, TCCAGATCTTCGCCAAGGCCAATGACGGCAAG; E97A, CAAGAGCTGTCTCAACGCAGCCTCCTGGATG; S124A and D126A, GTTAATAGCTCCGGCACCAGCCACAGACACTTCC. All constructs were verified by DNA sequencing.

Expression and Purification of Recombinant Proteins—Recombinant proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli strain BL21(DE3)pLysS as described previously (19). The light chains were purified under denaturating conditions. Cells were suspended in 6 M guanidine hydrochloride, 0.5 M NaCl, 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.8, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 20 µg/ml pepstatin A and homogenized with sonication. The homogenate was centrifuged at 50,000 x g, and the supernatant was loaded onto a Ni2+ chelate column (ProBond, Invitrogen); the column was washed with a buffer containing 8 M urea, 0.5 M NaCl, 20 mM sodium phosphate at pH 6.0 and 5.3, and the recombinant protein was eluted at pH 4.0. The RD was purified under non-denaturing conditions; cells were suspended in 0.5 M NaCl, 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.8, 3 mM NaN3, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride on ice. After sonication and centrifugation of the homogenate, the supernatant was loaded on a ProBond column and washed with the same buffer at pH 6.0 containing 50 mM imidazole, and the RD was eluted by increasing the concentration of imidazole to 0.5 M. The eluted light chains and RD were dialyzed against 20 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.6, 3 mM NaN3, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM DTT and loaded onto a Mono Q ion exchange column equilibrated with the same buffer. The absorbed proteins were eluted by a linear gradient of NaCl to 0.5 M.

Purification of Physarum Myosin—Plasmodia of Physarum were grown on Quaker oatmeal according to Camp (20) with some modifications (21). Myosin was isolated from the collected plasmodia by the high salt extraction method as described earlier (5).

Calcium Binding Experiments—The extent of Ca2+ binding was measured by the flow dialysis method according to Nakashima et al. (22, 23) with 45CaCl2 (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) in 0.1 M NaCl, 20 mM MOPS/NaOH, pH 7.0, at 25 °C in the presence or absence 2 mM MgCl2. The protein concentrations were 25–100 µM. The loss of radioactive ligand during the experiments and the nonspecific Ca2+ binding to the flow dialysis cell were corrected. In some experiments we measured Ca2+ binding by equilibrium dialysis as described previously (24) at 22 °C in a buffer containing 50 mM NaCl, 20 mM MOPS/NaOH, pH 7.0, 3 mM NaN3, 0.11 mM45CaCl2, and various concentrations of EGTA to obtain the desired free Ca2+ concentration. The resulting Ca2+-binding data were analyzed by fitting to the Adair-Klotz equation (25) for single binding site,

(Eq. 1)
where KCa2+ is the apparent macroscopic dissociation constant for Ca2+, y is the number of bound Ca2+ ions, and j is the correction factor for nonspecific binding. The macroscopic dissociation constant for Mg2+ was calculated from Ca2+-binding data in the presence of Mg2+ fitted to the equation describing the competition of Ca2+ and Mg2+ for single binding site,

(Eq. 2)
where KMg2+ is the macroscopic dissociation constant for Mg2+, KCa2+ is the macroscopic dissociation constant for Ca2+, y' is the number of bound Ca2+ ions (mol/mol) at a given Mg2+ concentration, and j is the correction factor for nonspecific binding.

ELC Labeling with 1,5-IAEDANS—Wild-type and mutant ELCs containing a single cysteine (Cys-10) were labeled with 3-fold molar excess of 1,5-IAEDANS (Sigma-Aldrich) in 6 M guanidine hydrochloride, 10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, for 30 min at room temperature. Labeling was terminated with 1 mM DTT, and then the samples were dialyzed overnight against a buffer containing 50 mM NaCl, 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 0.1 mM DTT.

Transient Kinetic Assays—Transient kinetic assays were performed using an Applied Photophysics SX18MV stopped flow apparatus with a 150 watt Xe lamp at 22 °C. The dead time of the system was 1.5 ms, as determined earlier (26). The assay buffer contained 50 mM NaCl, 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, and 0.1 mM DTT. The IAEDANS-labeled ELCs were excited at 336 nm, and the emission was monitored through a GG455 filter. Ca2+- and Mg2+-saturated IAEDANS-labeled ELCs were rapidly mixed with excess EDTA, respectively. Ca2+ dissociation from RD were investigated by mixing the Ca2+-saturated RD with excess of the calcium indicator Quin 2 (Sigma-Aldrich), which rapidly binds Ca2+, reducing the free calcium concentration to nanomolar range. The samples were excited at a wavelength of 366 nm, and the fluorescence was measured through the GG455 filter. During the determination of Mg2+ dissociation rate from RD by displacement of Mg2+ with Ca2+, the decrease in Ca2+ concentration was detected by using the low affinity calcium indicator Calcium Green 5N (Molecular Probes). The excitation wavelength was 506 nm, and fluorescence was detected through a 530-nm cut-off filter. All data were collected on a logarithmic time base and analyzed by fitting to exponential functions using Origin, version 5.0 (Microcal Software). Second order rate constants (kon) for Ca2+ and Mg2+ binding to ELC and RD were also calculated using the equation,

(Eq. 3)
where koff is the dissociation rate constant, determined by transient kinetic measurements, and Kd is the appropriate macroscopic dissociation constants determined by flow dialysis experiments.

Steady-state Fluorescence Studies—Steady-state fluorescence of labeled ELCs was measured at 22 °C in an assay buffer containing 50 mM NaCl, 20 mM MOPS/NaOH, pH 7.2, 0.1 mM DTT using a Spex Fluoromax spectrofluorometer. The samples were excited at 336 nm, and the fluorescence spectra were collected between 450 and 520 nm. Intrinsic Trp fluorescence of Physarum RD was measured in the same assay buffer, samples were excited at 297 nm, and fluorescence spectra were collected between 310 and 370 nm. The desired free Ca2+ (Mg2+) concentrations were adjusted by adding 0.1 mM EGTA (EDTA) and the appropriate amount of CaCl2 (MgCl2), calculated by the program ALEX (a gift of Dr. M. Vivaudou).

Limited Proteolysis of RD—RD (0.5 mg/ml) was incubated at 20 °C with L-1-tosylamido-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone-treated bovine trypsin (Sigma-Aldrich) at a ratio of 1:100 (w/w) in a buffer containing 0.1 M NaCl, 20 mM MOPS/NaOH, pH 7.0, 1 mM MgCl2, and 0.1 mM EGTA. The samples were digested in the presence and absence of 0.2 mM CaCl2 for 0–30 min. At predetermined times aliquots were removed, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride was added. The fractions were immediately boiled in SDS sample buffer and separated by 15% SDS-PAGE.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Sequence Analysis of the Light Chains and Design of Mutant ELCs—The primary structure of Physarum ELC and RLC is more homologous with calmodulin (40% sequence identity with vertebrate CaM) than with myosin light chains of higher eukaryotes (30–32 and 27–28% identity with metazoan ELCs and RLCs, respectively). Physarum LCs has the highest homology with light chains of Dictyostelium myosin II (65 and 53% sequence identity in the case of ELC and RLC, respectively). Based on the amino acid sequence of Physarum ELC, EF-hand I, III, and IV are predicted to bind Ca2+ (Table I). EF-hand I and III have regular, CaM-like binding loops, whereas EF-hand IV, termed as "ancestral" EF-hand, was also considered as a potential Ca2+-binding site (17). The 12-residue loop of a canonical EF-hand provides seven coordination positions for Ca2+ (27, 28). The amino acid, usually glutamic acid, at the last position (–z) plays a central role in coordinating the calcium in a bidentate manner by its side chain oxygens (29) such that its mutation abolishes the Ca2+ binding of canonical EF-hands (30). To localize and characterize the Ca2+-binding site we have constructed ELCs containing point mutations in EF-hand I, -II, and -IV. Glutamic acid in the –z position of the Ca2+-binding loop of motives I and III was changed to alanine in E26A ELC and E97A ELC, respectively. We have also designed a triple mutant D15A/D17A/E26A ELC containing two additional mutations at the x and y positions to ensure complete loss of binding capacity. For studying the metal binding loop of motif IV the double mutant S124A/D126A ELC was constructed. Sequence analysis of Physarum RLC suggested that EF-hand I of RLC cannot be a functional divalent cation-binding site since it contains a glycine in the –z position of the binding loop.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE I
Amino acid sequences of the EF-hand loops of Physarum ELC, RLC, EF-hand I of Dictyostelium ELC and mammalian calmodulin

The amino acids substituted for alanine in the mutant ELCs are boldfaced and italicized. Consensus sequence of the canonical Ca2+ binding loop together with the six coordinating residues (x, y, z, -y, -x, -z) is shown below. O, oxygen-containing side group; #, hydrophobic residue; X, any amino acid residue.

 

Expression and Purification of Recombinant Light Chains and Regulatory Domain—The wild-type and mutant ELCs, the C- and N-terminal domains of ELC, RLC, and Dictyostelium ELC, were expressed in E. coli to investigate their Ca2+-binding properties. Recombinant Physarum myosin RD was produced by co-expressing ELC, RLC, and the HC fragment (residues 771–841) in E. coli (see "Experimental Procedures"). The RLC and ELC (mutant or wild type) co-purified with the HC fragment containing a His6 affinity tag (see Fig. 6, 0 min), suggesting that the three polypeptide chains can assemble into RD in the bacterial cell and that mutations of ELC do not affect binding of the light chains to the heavy chain fragment. The average yields of RDs and LCs were 15–20 and 35–45 mg of protein/liter of culture media, respectively.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.
Limited proteolysis of RD. Tryptic digestion of RD was digested with L-1-tosylamido-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone-treated bovine trypsin at a ratio of 1:100 (w/w) 0.1 M NaCl, 20 mM MOPS/NaOH, pH 7.0, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EGTA in the presence (+) and absence (–) of 0.2 mM CaCl2. Samples were taken after 3, 10, 30 min of incubation with trypsin, inactivated by 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and separated by 15% SDS-PAGE.

 

Localization and Characterization of the Ca2+-binding Site by Direct Binding Assay—Ca2+ binding measurements are summarized in Figs. 1, 2, 3, and macroscopic dissociation constants, calculated by the Adair-Klotz equation (see "Experimental Procedures"), are summarized in Table II. The wild-type ELC and RD bind one Ca2+ (mol/mol). The RD showed considerably higher Ca2+ affinity than those of ELC; however, the divalent cation-binding site is not highly specific to Ca2+ in either molecule (Fig. 1). Examination of recombinant Dictyostelium ELC by flow dialysis also indicated the presence of one divalent cation-binding site, whereas Physarum RLC did not show any metal binding (Fig. 2). Binding studies of the two separate lobes of Physarum ELC revealed that the Ca2+-binding site is located in the N-terminal domain (Fig. 2). In accordance with these results, the mutants E97A ELC and S124A/D126A ELC (EF-hand III and IV mutants, respectively) show similar calcium-binding capacity to the wild type ELC. Only partial loss of Ca2+ binding was observed in the mutant E26A ELC (EF-hand I mutant), although the glutamic acid in the –z position of a canonical metal binding loop normally provides bidentate coordination for Ca2+. Introduction of two additional mutations in the first and third position of loop I (D15A/D17A/E26A ELC) completely abolished Ca2+ binding to both ELC and RD, indicating that EF-hand I of ELC is the only binding site for divalent cations in Physarum myosin (Fig. 3). Ca2+-binding studies of myosin by equilibrium dialysis showed that Physarum myosin binds 2 mol of Ca2+/mol of protein non-cooperatively with a macroscopic dissociation constant of 4.4 µM in the presence of 2 mM MgCl2 (Fig. 1, inset).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
Ca2+-binding to Physarum ELC, RD and myosin. Ca2+ binding to ELC and RD was measured in the presence (triangles) and absence (circles) of 2 mM MgCl2 by flow dialysis with 45CaCl2 in 0.1 M NaCl, 20 mM MOPS/NaOH pH 7.0 at 25 °C. • and {blacktriangleup}, RD; {circ} and {triangleup}, ELC. Inset, Ca2+ binding to the Physarum myosin was measured in the presence of 2 mM MgCl2 by equilibrium dialysis method in a buffer containing 50 mM NaCl, 20 mM MOPS/NaOH pH 7.0, 3 mM NaN3 at 22 °C. Solid lines show the best-fit curves to Adair-Klotz equation (Experimental Procedures) for each set of data.

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
Ca2+ binding to RLC and wild-type or mutant ELCs. Ca2+ binding was measured under the same conditions in the absence of Mg2+ as shown in Fig. 1. {blacksquare}, E97A ELC (domain III mutant); {square}, S124A/D126A ELC (domain IV mutant); {circ}, N-terminal lobe of ELC; *, C-terminal lobe of ELC; •, Dictyostelium ELC; {triangledown}, Physarum RLC. The solid line represents the best-fit curve to the binding data of wild-type ELC.

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
Effect of mutations of metal binding loop I on the Ca2+-binding properties of recombinant ELCs and RD. Flow dialysis experiments were carried out under the same conditions as shown in Fig. 1. Ca2+ binding of RD containing D15A/D17A/E26A was measured by equilibrium dialysis method (see "Experimental Procedures"). •, wild-type ELC; {blacksquare}, E26A ELC; {blacktriangleup}, D15A/D17A/E26A ELC; {triangleup}, RD containing D15A/D17A/E26A ELC. Solid lines were fitted to the binding data of wild-type and E26A ELC as indicated in Fig. 1.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE II
Divalent cation binding to wild-type and mutant ELCs, RD and myosin

 

Transient Kinetics of Divalent Cation Dissociation—Because the metal-binding site in the ELC of Physarum myosin has moderate selectivity for Ca2+ (see Fig. 1 and Table II) it could be occupied by Mg2+ under physiological conditions. To assess whether bound Mg2+ could be exchanged at a physiologically relevant time scale upon increase in Ca2+ concentration, dissociation rates of the two ions from ELC and RD were measured by stopped flow fluorimetry. The results are summarized in Table III and Fig. 4. The divalent cation-sensitive fluorescence of IAEDANS-labeled ELC was used to determine the Ca2+ and Mg2+ dissociation rates of ELC. Wild-type and mutant ELCs containing a single cysteine residue (Cys-10) in the A helix of EF-hand I were stoichiometrically labeled with 1,5-IAEDANS. Ca2+- or Mg2+-saturated IAEDANS-labeled light chains were mixed with an excess of EDTA. The association of divalent cations with EDTA is fast enough (kon of EDTA {approx} 4.5 x 106 M1s1 for Ca2+ (31)) that the rate-limiting steps in these experiments were the dissociation of Ca2+/Mg2+ from ELC with a koff value of 671.1 s1 for Ca2+ and with a nearly 40-fold lower value for Mg2+ (koff = 18.1 s1). Ca2+ off-rate of RD was determined by mixing the Ca2+-saturated RD with excess of the calcium indicator Quin 2. The association of Ca2+ with Quin 2 is a fast, diffusion controlled process with a kon {approx} 109 M1s1 (32); therefore, the rate-limiting step was Ca2+ dissociation from the RD. The observed koff value of 2.03 s1 for Ca2+ dissociation from the RD is similar to the Ca2+ off-rates of a (Ca2+)4·CaM·target peptide complex (33).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE III
Kinetic parameters for dissociation and binding of divalent cations as measured by stopped flow experiments

 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
Dissociation of Ca2+ and Mg2+ from Physarum ELC and RD monitored by stopped-flow method. Dashed and dotted line, single exponential curve fitted to the data set of EDTA induced Ca2+ release from IAEDANS-labeled ELC. One syringe of the stopped-flow apparatus contained 1 µM labeled ELC and 0.5 mM CaCl2, and the other contained 5 mM EDTA. Dotted line, single exponential function fitted to the transient of EDTA induced Mg2+ dissociation from labeled ELC. Syringe A contained 1 µM ELC, and 1 mM MgCl2, and syringe B contained 5 mM EDTA. Dashed line, single exponential curve fitted to data set of Ca2+ release from RD. Ca2+-bound RD was mixed with fluorescent Ca2+ indicator Quin 2. Initial concentrations in syringes are 47 µM RD and 100 µM CaCl2 (syringe A) and 200 µM Quin 2 (syringe B). Solid line, single exponential function fitted to data set of Mg2+ dissociation from RD. The release of Mg2+ was monitored by measuring the rate of chasing of Mg2+ with Ca2+ from RD, and the change of Ca2+ concentration was detected with the low affinity calcium indicator Calcium Green 5N. Syringe A contained 47 µM RD and 1 mM MgCl2, and syringe B contained 200 µM CaCl2 and 1 µM Calcium Green 5N. The observed relative changes of fluorescence are shown on logarithmic time base. All experiments were carried out in 50 mM NaCl, 50 mM HEPES/NaOH, pH 7.6, and 0.1 mM DTT at 22 °C with equal syringe volumes.

 

The koff value for Mg2+ was obtained by measuring the rate of chasing of Mg2+ with Ca2+ from the RD. The change in Ca2+ concentration was followed with the low affinity calcium indicator, Calcium Green 5N, suitable for fast kinetic studies (koff = 104 s1 for Ca2+ (31)). Mg2+ dissociates from the Mg2+·RD complex with a value of 1.08 s1, which is nearly 20-fold faster than koff of Mg2+ from the divalent metal-binding site of RLC in skeletal muscle myosin S1 (34). Second order rate constants (kon) for Ca2+ and Mg2+ binding to ELC and RD were also calculated from the dissociation rate constants and macroscopic dissociation constants, determined by flow dialysis method (see "Experimental Procedures"). Mg2+ binding to both ELC and RD is 10–20-fold slower process compared with the rate of association of Ca2+ with ELC and RD, respectively (Table III).

Steady-state Fluorescence Studies—To examine the conformational changes induced by divalent cation binding, steady-state fluorescence studies were performed on both ELC and RD. The microenvironment of the 1,5-IAEDANS-labeled cysteine in wild-type ELC is markedly influenced by metal binding, monitored by changes of AEDANS fluorescence (Fig. 5). The fluorescence titration curve has similar shape as the plot of direct Ca2+ binding. The addition of Ca2+ or Mg2+ to the labeled D15A/D17A/E26A ELC did not affect the fluorescence. EF-hand III and IV mutant ELCs (E97A ELC and S124A/D126A ELC) had a similar fluorescence profile to the wild type upon increasing the Ca2+ level (not shown). Ca2+-induced conformational change of RD was also detected by intrinsic Trp fluorescence measurements. The four Trp residues of Physarum RD are located in the heavy chain fragment; three of them are clustered at the RLC binding region, whereas the fourth Trp is in the first IQ motif, which binds ELC. The observed 5.4% change in fluorescence is likely due to the latter. Mg2+ binding induces a smaller fluorescence change in ELC (or RD) (Fig. 5.); however, this cation does not have an inhibitory effect on the activity of Physarum myosin (5).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.
Effect of Ca2+ and Mg2+ on the fluorescence of IAEDANS-labeled ELC. Fluorescence of wild-type ELC was measured in a buffer containing 50 mM NaCl, 20 mM MOPS/NaOH, pH 7.2, 0.1 mM DTT at 22 °C as a function of Ca2+ concentration ({blacksquare}), Mg2+ concentration (•), and Ca2+ in the presence of 2 mM MgCl2 ({square}). {blacktriangledown}, fluorescence of D15A/D17A/E26A ELC as a function of Ca2+.

 

Limited Proteolysis—Limited proteolysis of RD with trypsin was performed in the presence and absence of Ca2+ (Fig. 6). As the time course of the digestions shows, the first event was the cleavage of the HC fragment of RD, presumably just after the His6 tag, where a thrombin cleavage site is found, followed by the further fragmentation of the HC. Subsequently, the cleavage of ELC and then that of RLC was observed. The cleavage of ELC, similar to the fragmentation of HC, was slower in the presence of Ca2+, demonstrating the diminished accessibility of trypsin to the internal cleavage sites as a consequence of Ca2+ binding.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The oscillatory cytoplasmic streaming in Physarum plasmodia is thought to be powered by a conventional myosin whose activity is inhibited by an increase of Ca2+ concentration. Ca2+ could regulate the activity of plasmodial actomyosin through several mechanisms, one of which is the direct Ca2+ binding to myosin (5). ELC was suggested to be the Ca2+-receptive subunit of Physarum myosin (1517). Indeed, we confirmed these results by flow dialysis measurements of recombinant ELC and RD; both contain one Ca2+-binding site. Furthermore, we localized the regulatory Ca2+ site in the first EF-hand of ELC. Scallop myosin, the only other known Ca2+-binding conventional myosin, has the regulatory site located also in EF-hand I of ELC (35). Unlike the calmodulin-like canonical EF-hand I of Physarum ELC, the triggering site of scallop myosin has a unique EF-hand sequence and an unusual structure. The Ca2+-binding loop is shorter (9 versus 12 residues) and has different ligand positions than in regular EF-hands (10, 11). The very fact that the Ca2+-binding site is located in the same EF-hand motif raises the possibility that there could be common features in the structural basis of the two but oppositely regulated myosins. Flow dialysis experiments of RLC verified our prediction that Physarum RLC does not have a functional bivalent cation-binding site. This feature seems to be a characteristic of all lower eukaryotic RLCs (36). Interestingly we found that Dictyostelium ELC also contains a bivalent cation-binding site. However, the enzymatic activity of Dictyostelium myosin II is regulated by phosphorylation (37); therefore, we assume that this binding site is either not specific for Ca2+, or even if it preferentially binds Ca2+, the binding site has only a structural and non-regulatory role. Based on the high sequence similarity between Physarum and Dictyostelium ELC, the binding site is presumably located in EF-hand I of both ELCs.

Physarum ELC and RD bind Ca2+ with a macroscopic dissociation constant of 20 and 7.3 µM, respectively (Table II). Ca2+ has three times higher affinity to RD than to the isolated ELC, which could be explained by stabilizing interactions of the binding EF-hand with the other two chains of the RD complex. Interestingly, the Mg2+ affinity of RD is approximately the same as that of the isolated ELC. In the case of scallop myosin, Ca2+ binds with high affinity and selectivity to the EF-hand I of ELC only in the three-chain complex of RD (38). Physarum myosin shows an ~50-fold higher Ca2+ affinity over RD in the presence of 2 mM MgCl2 (the apparent dissociation constant of Ca2+ is 4.4 µM; see Table II and Fig. 1, inset), indicating that the divalent cation-binding site has considerably higher Ca2+ discrimination in the full-size myosin molecule (Kd of Mg2+ is greater than 1 mM in myosin). Thus, not only the interchain interactions within the RD but also the presence of interhead and/or motor domain-ELC interactions could increase the Ca2+ selectivity of the binding site. The Ca2+ affinity of Physarum myosin is in the same range as the average Ca2+ affinity to the EF-hands of CaM (39). The interplasmodial concentration of Ca2+ and Mg2+ is in the micromolar range and ~1 mM, as determined by injecting aequorin into plasmodia (40) and by an NMR technique (41), respectively. Therefore, it seems likely that in vivo the binding site of myosin is at least partially saturated by Mg2+. It is worth noting that CaM does not have an absolute selectivity for Ca2+ either. Mg2+ was shown to compete with Ca2+ at or near physiological conditions; however, Mg2+ binds to the EF-hands of CaM without inducing the conformational changes responsible for its biological functions (4244).

Regarding the physiological relevance of the competitive binding of the two divalent cations to Physarum myosin, it was important to investigate the exchange rate between Ca2+ and Mg2+. As determined by transient kinetic measurements, the calcium off-rate of ELC and RD is 671.1 and 2.03 s1, respectively. Similar dissociation rates were observed in the case of CaM and CaM-target peptide complexes (33). The estimated Ca2+ off-rate of scallop RD (~25 s1) is faster compared with that of Physarum RD (45). However, the difference is only 10-fold, and it should be taken into account that the cytoplasmic streaming driven by Physarum myosin is a much slower process than contraction of scallop adductor muscle. The replacement of Mg2+ by Ca2+ at the potential regulatory site of ELC on the increase of intracellular Ca2+ concentration is limited by the rate of Mg2+ dissociation, a value of 1.08 s1. Apparently, this Mg2+-Ca2+ exchange rate is considerable faster than that observed at the nonspecific divalent cation-binding sites of scallop and chicken skeletal muscle RLC (0.05 and 0.057 s1, respectively (34)) and also faster than the change in direction of cytoplasmic streaming (several seconds (12)); therefore, we conclude that the Ca2+ binding to Physarum ELC could act as a regulatory signal despite its limited selectivity.

The fact that direct Ca2+ binding to Physarum myosin inhibits its activity is unique among conventional myosins, but a similar type of regulation exists in many unconventional myosins where usually CaM is the light chain subunit. By increasing the Ca2+ concentration, CaMs may dissociate from some unconventional myosins, but others are inhibited without any loss of CaM (4649). In case of myosin IC, the C-terminal lobe of CaM was found to be responsible for inhibition of motor activity (8). The molecular mechanism of Ca2+ regulation must be different in the Physarum conventional myosin, where the inhibitory binding site is located in the N-terminal lobe of ELC. This is the first known example where a canonical EF-hand in the N-terminal domain of a light chain or CaM is involved in the inhibitory regulation of myosin activity.

Models of apo-CaM-myosin IQ complexes show that the N-terminal domain of CaM is in a closed conformation (50, 51). Based on the above structural models and the high sequence similarity of the Physarum myosin LCs to CaM we assume that the N-terminal domain of Physarum ELC is also in a closed conformation in the absence of Ca2+. Moreover, our results suggest that the site remains in the closed state upon Ca2+ binding since the 12th residue of the binding loop (–z position), in contrast to the standard EF-hands, does not take part in metal coordination; a replacement of the –z position Glu to Ala did not abolish Ca2+ binding, i.e. the characteristic closed-to-open transition of canonical EF-hands probably does not occur in the N-terminal lobe of Physarum ELC. Structural models of scallop RD show that the N-terminal domain of ELC is also in a closed state both in the Ca2+-bound and the Ca2+-free form (10, 11).2 Despite the opposite effect of Ca2+ binding on the motor activity of scallop and Physarum conventional myosins (activation versus inhibition) and the relatively low sequence similarities of the two Ca2+-binding ELCs, the two myosin motors have a common structural basis for Ca2+ regulation; that is, a closed N-terminal lobe of ELC both in the absence and presence of Ca2+. Nevertheless, the mechanism underlying Ca2+ regulation in the two conventional myosins is strikingly different; the scallop myosin RD acts as a bona fide on/off Ca2+ switch, whereas the Ca2+ binding to Physarum RD has only a modulatory effect (partial inhibition (5)) on the motor activity.

Steady-state fluorescence and limited proteolysis studies indicate that Ca2+ binding affects both the microenvironment of the binding site (as shown by fluorescence studies) and the overall structure of the RD (as shown by the decreased accessibility of tryptic sites of RD in the presence of Ca2+). The latter results could be interpreted as a decrease in the internal mobility of the RD and/or changes in the interactions between and/or within the three chains of the regulatory complex. Preliminary results using recombinant myosin fragments indicate that Ca2+ inhibition of in vitro motility is achieved only by a double-headed heavy meromyosin construct, whereas the single-headed subfragment-1 is not regulated,3 suggesting that head-head and/or head-rod interactions could contribute to the inhibitory state. In case of the Ca2+- and phosphorylation-activated conventional myosins (scallop and smooth muscle myosins, respectively), head-head and head-rod interactions stabilize the motor protein in the low activity off state, which is an asymmetric structure where the two heads interact and immobilize each other (52, 53).

This work provides evidence that the inhibitory Ca2+-binding site of Physarum myosin is located in the first EF-hand of ELC. Our results indicate that Ca2+ and Mg2+ compete for the binding site. However, the exchange of divalent cations is fast enough compared with the time scale required to regulate the cytoplasmic streaming; consequently, we conclude that the inhibitory system could operate in the plasmodia of Physarum myosin. We have recently obtained crystals of Physarum myosin RD, and its high resolution structure is currently being refined.4 The structure confirms the localization of the Ca2+-binding site in the first EF-hand motif of ELC and also verifies the surprising finding of this work that the Ca2+-saturated N-terminal lobe of ELC is in a closed conformation. Detailed analysis of the Physarum myosin RD structure could shed more light of this unique Ca2+ inhibitory mechanism, and its comparison with the scallop regulatory switch could deepen our general understanding of the Ca2+ regulation of conventional myosins.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by National Scientific Research Fund Grant OTKA T32443 [GenBank] and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, PázmányP.sétány 1/C, H-1117. Tel.: 361-381-2171; Fax: 361-381-2172; E-mail: nyitray{at}cerberus.elte.hu.

1 The abbreviations used are: RLC, regulatory light chain; ELC, essential light chain; CaM, calmodulin; RD, regulatory domain; HC, heavy chain; E26A ELC, Physarum ELC containing point mutation E26A; D15A/D17A/E26A ELC, Physarum ELC containing point mutations D15A, D17A, and E26A; E97A ELC, Physarum ELC containing point mutation E97A; S124A/D126A ELC, Physarum ELC containing point mutations S124A/D126A; 1,5-IAEDANS, 5-((((2-iodoacetyl)amino)ethyl)amino) naphthalene-1-sulfonic acid; koff, dissociation rates constant; kon, second order rate constant for divalent cation binding; MOPS, 3-morpholinopropanesulfonic acid; DTT, dithiothreitol. Back

2 C. Cohen, personal communication. Back

3 H. Kawamichi, A. Nakamura, L. Nyitray, and K. Kohama, unpublished results. Back

4 J. Debreczeni, L. Farkas, K. Kohama, and L. Nyitray, unpublished results. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Clive Bagshaw for allowing us to use his stopped flow apparatus. We also thank Drs. A. G. Szent-Györgyi and G. Hegyi for valuable suggestions and reading the manuscript.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Sellers, J. R. (2000) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1496, 3–22[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Kawasaki, H., and Kretsinger, R. H. (1994) Protein Profile, Vol. 1, pp. 343–351, Academic Press Ltd., London[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Trybus (1991) Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 18, 81–85[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Szent-Györgyi, A. G., Kalabokis, V. N., and Perreault-Micale, C. L. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biochem. 190, 55–62[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Kohama, K., and Kendrick-Jones, J. (1986) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 99, 1433–1446[Abstract]
  6. Kohama, K., Kohno, T., Okagaki, T., and Shimmen, T. (1991) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 110, 508–513[Abstract]
  7. Wolenski, J. S. (1995) Trends Cell Biol. 5, 310–316[CrossRef]
  8. Zhu, T., Beckingham, K., and Ikebe, M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 20481–20486[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Yokota, E., Muto, S., and Shimmen, T. (1999) Plant Physiol. 119, 231–240[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Xie, X., Harrison, D. H., Schlichting, I., Sweet, R. M., Kalabokis, V. N., Szent-Gyorgyi, A. G., and Cohen, C. (1994) Nature 368, 306–312[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Houdusse, A., and Cohen, C. (1996) Structure (Lond.) 4, 21–32[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Kamiya, N. (1981) Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 32, 205–236[CrossRef]
  13. Kessler, D., Eisenlohr, L. C., Lathwell, M. J., Huang, J., Taylor, H. C., Godfrey, S. D., and Spady, M. L. (1980) Cell Motil. 1, 63–71[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Kohama, K., Uyeda, T. O. P., Takano-Ohmuro, H., Tanaka, T., Yamaguchi, T., Maruyama, K., and Kohama, T. (1985) Proc. Jpn. Acad. 61, 501–505
  15. Kohama, K., Okagaki, T., Takano-Ohmuro, H., and Ishikawa, R. (1991) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 110, 566–570[Abstract]
  16. Ishikawa, R., Okagaki, T., Higashi-Fujime, S., and Kohama, K. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 21784–21790[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Ishikawa, R., Okagaki, T., and Kohama, K. (1992) J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 13, 321–328[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Chomczynski, P., and Sacchi, N. (1987) Anal. Biochem. 162, 156–159[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Nakamura, A., Okagaki, T., Takagi, T., Nakashima, K., Yazawa, M., and Kohama, K. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 3827–3834[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Camp, W. G. (1936) Bull. Torrey Bolt. Club 63, 205–210
  21. Hatano, S., and Oosawa, F. (1966) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 127, 488–498[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Nakashima, K., Maekawa, H., and Yazawa, M. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 5602–5610[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Nakashima, K., Ishida, H., Ohki, S. Y., Hikichi, K., and Yazawa, M. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 98–104[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Chantler, P. D., Sellers, J. R., and Szent-Gyorgyi, A. G. (1981) Biochemistry 20, 210–216[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Edsall, J. T., and Wyman, J. (1958) Biophysical Chemistry, Vol. 1, pp. 591–662, Academic Press, Inc., New York
  26. Kovacs, M., Malnasi-Csizmadia, A., Wooley, R. J., and Bagsham, C. R. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 28459–28467[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Babu, Y. S., Sack, J. S., Greenhough, T. J., Bugg, C. E., Means, A. R., and Cook, W. J. (1985) Nature 315, 37–40[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Babu, Y. S., Bugg, C. E., and Cook, W. J. (1988) J. Mol. Biol. 204, 191–204[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Strynadka, N. C., and James, M. N. (1989) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 58, 951–998[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Beckingham, K. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 6027–6030[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Naraghi, M. (1997) Cell Calcium 22, 255–268[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Quast, U., Labhardt, A. M., and Doyle, V. M. (1984) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 123, 604–611[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Brown, S. E., Martin, S. R., and Bayley, P. M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 3389–3397[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Bennett, A. J., and Bagshaw, C. R. (1986) Biochem. J. 223, 173–177
  35. Fromherz, S., and Szent-Gyorgyi, A. G. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 7652–7656[Abstract]
  36. Collins, J. H. (1991) J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 12, 3–25[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Tan, J. L., Ravid, S., and Spudich, J. A. (1992) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 61, 721–759[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Kwon, H., Goodwin, E. B., Nyitray, L., Berliner, E., O'Neall-Hennessey, E., Melandri, F. D., and Szent-Gyorgyi, A. G. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 4771–4775[Abstract]
  39. Chin, D., and Means, A. R. (2000) Trends Cell Biol. 10, 322–328[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Ridgway, E. B., and Durham, A. C. (1976) J. Cell Biol. 69, 223–226[Abstract]
  41. Kohama, K. (1987) Adv. Biophys. 23, 149–182[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Martin, S. R., and Bayley, P. M. (2002) Protein Sci. 11, 2909–2923[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Malmendal, A., Linse, S., Evenas, J., Forsen, S., and Drakenberg, T. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 11844–11850[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Malmendal, A., Evenas, J., Thulin, E., Gippert, G. P., Drakenberg, T., and Forsen, S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 28994–29001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Jackson, A. P., and Bagshaw, C. R. (1988) Biochem. J. 251, 515–526[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Trybus, K. M., Krementsova, E., and Freyzon, Y. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 27448–27456[CrossRef]
  47. Yoshimura, M., Homma, K., Saito, J., Inoue, A., Ikebe, R., and Ikebe, M. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 39600–39607[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Homma, K., Saito, J., Ikebe, R., and Ikebe, M. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 34348–34354[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Collins, K., Sellers, J. R., and Matsudaira, P. (1990) J. Cell Biol. 110, 1137–1147[Abstract]
  50. Houdusse, A., Silver, M., and Cohen, C. (1996) Structure (Lond.) 4, 1475–1490[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  51. Houdusse, A., Trybus, K., and Cohen, C. (2000) Biophys. J. 78, 158a (abstr.)
  52. Stafford, W. F., Jacobsen, M. P., Woodhead. J., Craig, R., O'Neall-Hennessey, E., and Szent-Gyorgyi, A. G. (2001) J. Mol. Biol. 307, 137–147[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  53. Wendt, T., Taylor, D., Trybus, K. M., and Taylor, K. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 4361–4366[Abstract/Free Full Text]