Impaired Pressure Sensation in Mice Lacking TRPV4*

Makoto Suzuki {ddagger}, Atsuko Mizuno {ddagger}, Kunihiko Kodaira §  and Masashi Imai {ddagger}

From the {ddagger}Department of Pharmacology, Jichi Medical School, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Minamikawachi, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan and the §Pharmaceutical Technology Laboratory, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Shizuoka 412-8513, Japan

Received for publication, March 13, 2003 Accepted for publication April 5, 2003.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The sensation of pressure, mechanosensation, in vertebrates remains poorly understood on the molecular level. The ion channel TRPV4 is in the TRP family and is a candidate for a mechanosensitive calcium-permeable channel. It is located in dorsal root ganglia. In the present study, we show that disrupting the Trpv4 gene in mice markedly reduced the sensitivity of the tail to pressure and acidic nociception. The threshold to noxious stimuli and the conduction velocity of myelinated nerve responding to stimuli were also impaired. Activation of unmyelinated nerve was undetected. However, the mouse still retained olfaction, taste sensation, and heat avoidance. The TRPV4 channel expressed in vitro in Chinese hamster ovary cells was opened by low pH, citrate, and inflation but not by heat or capsaicin. These data identify the TRPV4 channel as essential for the normal detection of pressure and as a receptor of the high-threshold mechanosensory complex.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Stimulation of sensory receptors by pressure due to a weight affects a variety of sensations, including touch, pressure, and pain. The molecular mechanism underlying both touch and pain has been investigated by studies on mice lacking a mechanosensitive channel (1) or a nociceptor (2). A mouse disrupted with MEC/DEG has reduced low-threshold mechanosensation but the sense of acidic stimuli is not affected (1). A mouse lacking Trpv1 does not respond to stimulation with capsaicin; heat and acid induce nociception, but the knock-out shows response to the pressure sensation (2).

The ion channel that converts pressure or anisosmomolarity into electrical stimuli remains unknown. A clue to its identity came from the discovery of Osm-9 in a genetic screen of high-osmolarity-insensitive Caenorhabditis elegans mutants (3). The structure of Osm-9 is quite similar to the vanilloid-receptive channel, VR1 (TRPV1) (4), as well as to TRPV4 (SAC1 (5), OTRPC4 (6), VR-OAC (7), VRl2 (8, 9)), and TRPV2 (10). TRPV1 is a member of the TRP family; it has six transmembrane segments and ankyrin-like repeats and is responsive to the physical factor of heat. Assuming that the family operates through a mechanically gated channel, we have cloned the incomplete form of Trpv4 (a PCR-based chimera of TRPV1 and TRPV4) as a stretch-inhibitable channel (11). However, we did not confirm that TRPV4 was a mechanosensitive channel at that point. TRPV4 has been reported as a swell-activated but not inflation-activated channel (6). Further it has also been reported to be activated by heat (12).

To investigate the role of TRPV4 in mechanosensation, we disrupted the mouse Trpv4 gene and then examined its role in the sensation of pressure. We reproduced affluent stimuli in vitro.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cloning of cDNA and Detection—Homologous cDNA of Trpv4 was screened by the BLAST program on the EST (expressed sequence tag) data base, resulting in two independent clones, Trpv2 and Trpv4 (GenBankTM accession number AB021875 [GenBank] ). The cloned cDNA was ligated to mammalian expression vector pCMV-SPORT (Invitrogen). A plasmid expressing enhanced green fluorescence protein (pEGFP-N1, BD Biosciences) or red fluorescence protein (pDsRed1-N1, BD Biosciences) was used as a marker for transfection into cells, which was performed using FuGENE 6TM (Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH). The functional experiments were performed 48 h after the transfection.

Reverse polymerase followed by polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR)1 was performed according to the manufacturer's protocol (RNAPCR, Takara, Osaka, Japan) with 0.3 µg of RNA as a template. The amplification conditions consisted of incubation at 94 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s for a total of 29 cycles.

Antibody was raised against C-terminal peptide (CDGHQQGYAPK) in a solution using keyhole limpet homocyanin as a conjugate. The antigen of 1 mg/ml DW with 1 ml of Freund's adjuvant was injected intramuscularly into a New Zealand White rabbit followed by a biweekly booster injection of the same dose of the antigen in Freund's incomplete adjuvant. The titer of the serum used was more than 10,000 times higher than the control. To obtain polyclonal anti-TRPV4 antibodies, the IgG fraction was purified with a protein G column (HiTrap, Amersham Biosciences) and affinity-purified with a kit (Prot OnTM, MPS, San Diego). Western blot analysis with a blocking test by excess of antigen was performed to evaluate the specificity. Histologic staining was performed and detected by fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled anti-rabbit IgG (Dako, Kyoto, Japan).

Construction of Targeting Vector and Generation of Trpv4 Mutant Mice—We disrupted the Trpv4 gene by homologous recombination using the PKG-neo cassette and standard methods (13). Murine genomic clones were obtained from a 129/SV mouse bacterial artificial chromosome genomic library (Genome Systems, St. Louis, MO) using Trpv4 cDNA as a probe. The targeting vector contained a 2.2-kb (short) and a 3.7-kb (long) arm of homology flanking a PKG-neo cassette. The vector was electroporated into RW4 embryonic stem cells (Genome Systems), which were selected in G418 (Invitrogen). The resulting chimeras were bred to C57BL/6 females. Mice heterozygous for the Trpv4 mutation (TRP4+/–) were intercrossed to generate Trpv4-null mice (Trpv4–/–). The genotype was examined by Southern blot or PCR. Mice at 11–19 weeks of age were used throughout this experiment. Trpv4–/– mice were mated to C57BL/6 to the fourth generation. Sex-matched wild-type littermates (Trpv4+/+) were used as controls.

Electrophysiology—Patch clamp recordings were carried out according to methods described previously (8, 11). Currents were recorded at room temperature with an EPC-9 patch clamp amplifier (HEKA, Pflaz, Germany). Current was normalized by capacitance of the individual cell. The bath solution contained 140 mM NaCl, 1.0 mM MgCl2,and3mM HEPES. The whole-cell patch pipette contained a filtered solution of 150 mM CsCl, 1.0 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM ATP (pH 7.2, pCa 7.6). To measure Ca2+/CS permeability the bath solution underwent a substitution with 10 mM CaCl2, 140 mM N-methyl-D-glucamine chloride, 1 mM MgCl2,and3mM HEPES. To elucidate a candidate opener, a solution of 4-aminopyridine (105 M), quinidine (105 M), capsaicin (105 M), and organic acids (1 mM) was used. A single channel of TRPV4 in inside-out configuration was observed with a symmetrical NaCl bath solution.

Frequency of discharge in vivo from the hind limb was measured electrically with an amplifier (DAM-8, World Precision Instruments, FL) using methods described previously (14). Action potentials were recorded using Axon software. The needle pricking the skin was connected to a pulse generator to determine the conduction velocity. The mechanical threshold was determined with a needle connected to a manometer.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
TRPV4 Is Distributed in Various Sensory Organs—According to Northern blot analysis, TRPV4 is rich in the kidney and lung, and precise detection by antibody or RT-PCR reveals its presence in various other organs than kidney and lung (7, 9). TRPV4 protein was analyzed histologically using Western blot analysis with antibody raised against the C terminus. An excess of antigen supported the specificity of this affinity-purified antibody (Fig. 1, upper left). Using the antibody, neuronal tissues were histologically stained. In the sensory system, neurons in the trigeminal nerve, cauda equina, skin nerve (9), and cochlear hair cells (7) were positively stained. The internal elastic membrane but not the taste bud of the tongue was positively stained (Fig. 1).



View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
Tissue distribution of TRPV4 related to the sensory system by immunohistochemistry. TRPV4 protein (20 µg/lane) was detected by C-terminal antibody (upper left, Western blot). The closed arrow indicates TRPV4 protein without antigen (Ag–) or incubated with an excess amount of antigen (Ag+). Immunohistochemical staining of representative tissues obtained from Trpv4+/+ (Cauda Equina), tongue, and trigeminal ganglion is shown. The white arrow indicates the elastic membrane of the tongue.

 

Disruption of the Trpv4 Gene—We made a knock-out mouse by a conventional method. We inserted a neo cassette into the fourth exon encoding the ankyrin-repeat domain (Fig. 2A). Southern blot revealed that the neo cassette was successfully inserted into the BglII fragment (Fig. 2B). Using RT-PCR with primers downstream from the targeted region and Northern blot (from lung, data not shown), we failed to detect transcripts in the trigeminal root and dorsal root ganglion (DRG) of Trpv4–/–animals (Fig. 2C). Histologically, DRG stains positively but did not do so in the Trpv4–/– mice (Fig. 2D). Therefore, TRPV4 expression was successfully disrupted in the Trpv4–/– mice.



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
Disruption of Trpv4 locus. A, structure of the wild Trpv4 locus, the resulting targeted locus, and the targeting cassette. Insertion of the neo cassette replaced the region encoding exon 4. The expected fragment sizes of Trpv4+/+ type (8.0 kb) and mutant (9.3 kb) alleles are indicated, and the location of probe used for Southern blot is shown. Arrows indicate primers for mRNA detection. B, Southern blot of BglII-digested genomic DNA. C, RT-PCR analysis of Trpv4 transcripts in tissues (10 mg) from Trpv4+/+ and Trpv4–/–. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) is amplified as a positive control. D, immunohistochemical staining of Trpv4+/+ and Trpv4–/– DRG.

 

Impaired Pressure and Acid Sensation in Trpv4–/– Mice— Trpv4–/–, heterozygous (+/–), and wild-type (+/+) mice were produced in the expected 1:2:1 Mendelian ratio. Trpv4–/– mice had normal appearance, growth, size, temperature, and fertility and showed no obvious behavioral abnormalities. Trpv4–/– and Trpv4+/+ mice avoided the odors induced by acetate, ammonium, benzene, ether, alcohol, pyrazine, and diacetyl. Dietary behavior was determined from the amount of jelly consumed. Over a 2-day period, mice were allowed to eat jelly containing 10% sucrose for 3 h/day. Then we changed the jelly by substituting other tastes. The taste sensation toward sweet (sucrose 10%, 1.2 ± 0.22 g/h), bitter (denatonium benzoate 1 mM, 1.1 ± 0.25 g/h), hot (capsaicin 0.1 mM, 0.01 ± 0 g/h), and sour (citrate 10%, 0.6 ± 0.23 g/h) tastes did not differ between Trpv4 +/+ and –/– mice (n = 8). Serum concentrations of sodium, potassium, and calcium were not different, and other abnormalities suggesting renal or hepatic failure were not found (data not shown).

Trpv4–/– mice showed a significantly reduced response to harmful stimuli caused by pressure on the tail and reduced their frequency of writhing for 10 min after application of acetic acid to the abdomen (0.7%, 100 µl) (Fig. 3). However, a negative response to the hot plate (50 °C) was not altered, indicating that heat detection was intact. The response of von Fray hairs to low-threshold mechanosensation (i.e. touch) did not differ between Trpv4+/+ and Trpv4–/– mice (Fig. 3).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
Response to pressure, acid, heat, and touch in Trpv4+/+ and Trpv4/mice. Upper panels, response threshold and latency of avoidance to persistent pressure applied to the tail (n = 13) of Trpv4+/+ (open column) and Trpv4–/– (closed column) mice. Lower panels, frequency of writhing behavior after injection of 0.7% acetate into the abdomen was counted over a 10-min span (n = 8). Response latency in the hot plate test and threshold of touch were measured (n = 10) (lower panel). **, p < 0.01, t test.

 

Response of TRPV4 to Pressure in DRG—To explore the characteristics of neurons with TRPV4, we investigated neural activity in vivo. The response of the femoral nerve to a pricking on the glabrous skin was measured. Using a manometer to push the 23-gauge needle evoked a rapid response (RR) discharge (Fig. 4, A and B). The threshold was measured in triplicate for a single nerve resulting in 120 ± 15 mm Hg in Trpv4+/+ and 350 ± 50 mm Hg in Trpv4–/– (n = 16 mice, p < 0.01). The needle was connected to a pulse generator to measure the conduction velocity of the nerve under pressure. Mean conductance of these nerves was 15 and 14 m/s, respectively.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
Response of neuronal discharges to harmful pressure. A, traces of spikes during a 15-s span in Trpv4–/– (left) and Trpv4+/+ (right) mice. RR (upper panel) is observed on the pressure pattern described below. Slow response with slow inactivation (SR) (lower panel) is observed on the pressure below. The arrow indicates activation of a single fiber responsive to pressure. B, threshold of RR to pressure through a 23-gauge needle is illustrated (n = 16; **, p < 0.01) in Trpv4+/+ and Trpv4–/–. C, frequency of discharge of SR during 1 min is counted in Trpv4+/+ and Trpv4–/– (**, p < 0.01).

 

A slow response (SR) nerve was defined as a nerve that responds slowly to the applied pressure. The nerve began to be activated at a threshold pressure. This pressure was 92 ± 15 mm Hg in Trpv4+/+ and 210 ± 40 mm Hg in Trpv4–/– (n = 8 mice, p < 0.01). The frequency of discharge over a 1-min span was markedly reduced in Trpv4–/– mice (Fig. 4, A and C). Pressure-response relationship, defined as inactivation by reduction of the pressure, occurred similarly in both animals within 1 min. The mean conductance of these nerves was similar to that of RR, 14 and 16 m/s, respectively.

To detect C-fiber, we recorded RR and then measured the conduction, because RR was detected frequently. In 300 pricks, six sites revealed slower (<10 m/s) conductance in Trpv4+/+ but none in Trpv4–/– mice. This difference was significant, using chi square analysis (Fisher).

Finally we touched the foot by von Fray hair (<1 g/mm2) and recorded the nerve activity. Although the conduction was not measured, this procedure evoked a continuous discharge with similar frequency in Trpv4+/+ (n = 12 sites) and Trpv4–/– mice (n = 14 sites).

Electrophysiologic Analysis of TRPV4 Current in Vitro—We evaluated possible stimuli to the ion channel expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells by patch clamping. We then estimated the candidate stimuli of taste and heat by their response to intracellular calcium concentration [Ca2+]i with fluo-3 (data not shown). The following reagents or stimuli inducing a sour, bitter, or hot sensation were tested: 4-aminopyridine, quinidine, denatonium benzoate, capsaicin, heat at 50 °C, acetate, propionate, lactate, pyruvate, and citrate. Comparable with the structurally similar TRPV2, TRPV4 responded significantly to low pH and citrate (Fig. 5, A–C). Among the organic acids in neutral pH, citrate was a specific activator of the TRPV4 channel, which suggested its involvement in the mechanism of sour detection. The current was activated dose-dependently by H+ and citrate (Fig. 5D). The range of pH that activates TRPV4 is similar to that of TRPV1 (15) but lower than the acid-sensing ion channel (16).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.
TRPV4 current in CHO cells. A, mean currents are plotted to voltage in CHO cells transiently expressing TRPV4 before (open circles) and after (closed circles) inflation (n = 4). Bath pH was altered from 7.5 to 4.0 (n = 4). B, representative whole-cell currents are shown during 100-ms voltage steps from –100 to +90 mV by 10-mV increment in the given bath pH and in GdCl3. Inflation of the volume was performed through pipette by +50 mm Hg in control CHO cells and TRPV4. C, current density was calculated as the magnitude of the current at +90 mV/cell capacitance. Mean ± S.E. values of four untransfected controls (TRPV2 or TRPV4) are illustrated: *, p < 0.05, compared with the control current; #, p < 0.05 compared with the experimental control with reagents (105 M 4-aminopyridine, 105 M quinidine, 106 M capsaicin, and 1 mM organic acids in pH 7.4) or with manipulation. D, dose-response results with citrate are plotted with S.E. (n = 6). Current density is plotted against bath pH.

 

In the same way as seen in an earlier study (7), mechanical stresses by hypo-osmolarity induced little TRPV4, and heat failed to activate it. Inflation of cell volume approaching a factor of 1.5 was done by positive pressure through a patch pipette. This inflation significantly increased the evoked current as compared with the basal current (Fig. 5C, *), as well as that of TRPV4 (p < 0.05) compared with the evoked current (Fig. 5C, #). Response to heat (50 °C) was determined by [Ca2+]i, which rose in TRPV2 but not in TRPV4 (data not shown). The current encoded by TRPV4 was outwardly rectified, selective for cation (Cs:Na:NMDG:Ca:Cl = 1:1.1:0.01:9: 0.01) (8), and abolished by 0.1 µM GdCl3 (Fig. 5B).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Mice Lacking Trpv4 Showed an Abnormal Sensory Phenotype—Because of the small but significant localization of TRPV4 in the sensory system, we examined various sensations in Trpv4–/– mice. Because TRPV4 is similar to Osm-9 in structure, we examined odor first. An Osm-9 mutant does not avoid pyrazine and diacetyl, but Trpv4–/– did avoid them. Next, we examined taste sensation. Mice lacking Trpv4 do not avoid capsaicin in tap water, whereas Trpv4–/– mice avoided it. Although TRPV4 was detected in the trigeminal ganglion and tongue and it was opened by citrate, citrate did not affect the sour sensation in vivo. Most previous studies have substantiated that the that is channel sensitive to sour is the epithelial sodium channel (17) in taste buds. TRPV1 is expressed in taste buds, sensing capsaicin directly, but TRPV4 was detected in the elastic membrane of the tongue and not in the taste buds, suggesting other mechanical roles in eating behavior.

TRPV4 is known to be sensitive to temperature in in vitro HEK293 cells (12). However, chicken but not rodent TRPV4 in CHO cells is sensitive to temperature (7). In both CHO and HEK293 cells, TRPV4 is activated at 34–40 °C but is not activated over 40 °C in vitro. This observation is compatible with the present data. TRPV4 detects a physiological range of temperatures rather than noxious heat. TRPV4 is not a nociceptor to heat but may play a role in thermoregulation during energy production, for example.

Writhing is a characteristic response to acidic nociception in a rodent. Like TRPV1, TRPV4 is a kind of nociceptor. Acetic acid administration into the abdominal cavity induces a noxious pain; the pH that opened the channel in vitro was lower than the physiologic level. Such low pH damages tissues. TRPV1 is sensitive to this range of pH and plays a role in inflammatory hyperalgesia (18). Thus, TRPV4 may play the same role in hyperalgesia, whereas the dorsal root acid-sensing channel detects the physiological range of the acidic irritant (19, 20). Touch by von Fray hair is a well known method to examine the sensation of innocuous stress. In BNC1 (brain sodium channel 1) knock-out mice, detection of touch sensation is impaired, but harmful pressure can still be detected (1). In Trpv1 knock-out mice, avoidance of heat is impaired, but harmful pressure can still be detected (2). Therefore, we considered that TRPV4 might play its own role in detection of high-threshold mechanosensation or pressure. The hot plate test, tail pressure, and von Fray touch are convenient tests that are easily reproduced. Taken together, impaired acid and pressure but intact hot and touch sensation was observed in Trpv4–/– mice, which was expected from the in vitro electrophysiologic study.

Detection of Functional Pressure-sensing Nerves—We found the presence of TRPV4 in DRG neurons histologically by fluorescence. We also detected it using hematoxylin to visualize the cell body. Less than 10% of the neurons contained TRPV4. Most of the TRPV4-positive cells (38 of 50 cells counted) were less than 20 µm in diameter. The results are matched with the previous findings with in situ hybridization (21). Smaller cells spread nonmyelinated axons corresponding to C-fiber, which is believed to be nociceptive. Therefore, we expected that the impaired axon in Trpv4–/– would be C-fiber. Frequency of detection of the mechanosensitive C-fiber by the present method is rare (about 1 in 50 measurements) (14). However, no C-fiber responding to pressure was detected in 300 measurements in Trpv4–/–, suggesting that pressure-sensitive C-fiber was actually absent in Trpv4–/– mice. This result should be clarified in the future by another method.

The impaired pressure-sensing fibers in Trpv4–/– were myelinated fibers according to their conductance. Burgess and Perl (22) discovered a substantial population of high-threshold mechanoceptive sensory units in myelinated afferent fibers. The impaired conduction velocity was around 15 m/s, corresponding to A{beta}-fiber or A-{gamma} deflection. The high-threshold mechanosensation is transmitted through A{beta}-fiber, innervated mostly to Ruffini endings, or through A-{gamma} with nonspecialized endings (14, 19). TRPV4 is located in skin nerve endings as well as in mechanosensitive small bodies (9). Therefore, pressure-sensing TRPV4 may be located primarily in these endings, transmitting the harmful input through myelinated fibers.

Electrophysiological Characterization in Vitro in CHO Cells—TRPV4 is known as a swell-activated but not an inflation-activated channel (6). We expressed TRPV4 in CHO cells but failed to find significant activation by hypo-osmolarity. We could recognize an infrequent swell-activated current in TRPV4-expressed CHO. The level of the activated current was 400 pA in hypotonic solution, which is consistent with the results of our previous work (7). Thus a lack of significance in our expression may be due to a statistical reason. In contrast, a recent study showed that TRPV4 was expressed as an osmosensing channel when transfected in HEK293 cells (6). We thought that TRPV4 expressed differently in different cells and examined the current again. In the setting of 150 mM NaCl bath solution and 150 mM CsCl in the pipette fill, TRVP4 endowed a larger current compared with the control in HEK293 cells, which was activated by hypo-osmolarity and decreased by hyperosmolarity (data not shown). Strotmann et al. (6) explicitly indicate that TRPV4 is not activated by inflation of the HEK cell. However, elasticity of the cell membrane is different in individual cells, and response of the cytoskeleton to hypo-osmolarity may be dependent on the enrichment of water channel and elasticity. Thus inflation of the cell can be a stimulus to open TRPV4 when it is expressed in other cell types.

The vanilloid receptor, TRPV1, is a channel that is sensitive to acid, capsaicin, and heat, where heat activation is the least sensitive stimulus in heterogeneously expressed cells using measurement of the currents (15). Likewise, the TRPV4 channel is sensitive to acid, citrate, and swelling, where swelling is the least sensitive stimulus. In conclusion, TRPV4 detected a nociceptive level of mechanical stimuli, which was substantiated in vivo in the sensory system of Trpv4–/– mice.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AB021875 [GenBank] .

* This work was supported in part by a grant from the Ministry of Culture, Education, and Science, Japan. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-285-58-7326; Fax: 81-285-44-5541; E-mail: macsuz{at}jichi.ac.jp.

1 The abbreviations used are: RT-PCR, reverse transcription followed by PCR; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; DRG, dorsal root ganglia; RR, rapid response with rapid inactivation. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Daiichi Pharmacy Co. for technical help.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Price, M. P., Gary, R. Lewin, G. R., McIlwrath, S. L., Cheng, C., Xie, J., Heppenstall, P. A., Stucky, C. L., Mannsfeldt, A. G., Brennan, T. J., Drummond, H. A., Qiao, J., Benson, C. J., Tarr, D. E., Hrstkak, R. F., Yangk, B., Williamsonk R. A., and Welsh, M. J. (2000) Nature 407, 1007–1011[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Caterina, M.-J., Leffler, A., Malmberg, A. B., Martin, W. J., Trafton, J., Petersen-Zeitz, K. R., Koltzenburg, M., Basbaum, A. I., and Julius, D. (2000) Science 288, 306–312[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Heather, A. C., Smith, T. L., and Bargmann, C. I. (1997) J. Neurosci. 17, 8259–8269[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Caterina, M. J., Schumacher, M. A., Tominaga, M., Rosen, T. A., Levine, J. D., and Julius, D. (1997) Nature 389, 816–824[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Suzuki, M., Ishibashi, K., and Imai, M. (1999) J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 10, 44 (abstr.)
  6. Strotmann, R., Harteneck, C., Nunnenmacher, K., Schultz, G., and Plant, T. D. (2000) Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 695–702[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Liedtke, W., Choe, Y., Marti-Renom, M. A., Bell, A. M., Denis, C. S., Sali, A., Hudspeth, A. J., Friedman, J. M., and Heller, S. (2000) Cell 27, 103, 525–535[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Suzuki, M., Ohki, G., Mochizuki, T., Somlo, S., Ishibashi, K., and Imai, M. (2002) FEBS Lett. 517, 219–224[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Delany, L. S., Hurle, M., Facer, P., Alnadaf, T., Plumpton, C., Kinghorn, I., See, C. G., Costigan, M., Anand, P., Woolf, C. J., Crowther, D., Sanseau, P., and Tate, S. N. (2001) Physiol. Genomics 4, 165–174[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Caterina, M. J., Rosen, T. A.,. Tominaga, T., Brake, A. J., and Julius, D. (1999) Nature 398, 436–441[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Suzuki, M., Sato, J., Kutsuwada, K., Ooki, G., and Imai, M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 6330–6335[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Watanabe, H., Vriens, J., Suh, S. H., Benham, C. D., Droogmans, G., and Nilius, B. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 47044–47051[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Mizuno, A., Amizuka, N., Irie, K., Murakami, A., Fujise, N., Kanno, T., Sato, Y., Nakagawa, N., Yasuda, H., Mochizuki, S., Gomibuchi, T., Yano, K., Shima, N., Washida, N., Tsuda, E., Morinaga, T., Higashio, K., and Ozawa, H. (1998) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 247, 610–615[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Kress, M., Koltzenburg, M., Reeh, P. W., and Handwerker, H. O. (1992) J. Neurophysiol. 68, 581–595[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Tominaga, M., Caterina, M. J., Malmberg, A. B., Rosen, T. A., Gilbert, H., Skinner, K., Raumann, B. E., Basbaum, A. I., and Julius, D. (1998) Neuron 21, 531–543[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Waldmann, R., Champigny, G., Bassilana, F., Heurteaux, C., and Lazdunski, M. (1997) Nature 386, 173–176[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Lindemann, B. (2001) Nature 413, 219–225[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Davis, J. B., Gray, J., Gunthorpe, M. J., Hatcher, J. P., Davey, P. T., Overend, P., Harries, M. H., Latcham, J., Clapham, C., Atkinson, K., Hughes, S. A., Rance, K., Grau, E., Harper, A. J., Pugh, P. L., Rogers, D. C., Bingham, S., Randall, A., and Sheardown, S. A. (2000) Nature 405, 183–187[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Perl, E. R. (1984) Handbook of Physiology, Vol. II, pp. 915–975
  20. Price, M. P., McIlwrath, S. L., Xie, J., Cheng, C., Qiao, J., Tarr, D. E., Sluka, K. A., Brennan, T. J., Lewin, G. R., and Welsh, M. J. (2001) Neuron 32, 1071–1083[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Schumacher, M. A., Jong, B. E., Frey, S. L., Sudanagunta, S. P., Capra, N. F., and Levine, J. D. (2000) Neurosci. Lett. 287, 215–218[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Burgess, G. E., and Perl, E. R. (1967) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 190, 541–562[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]