Increased Hepatic Fructose 2,6-Bisphosphate after an Oral Glucose Load Does Not Affect Gluconeogenesis*

Eunsook S. Jin {ddagger}, Kosaku Uyeda § ¶, Takumi Kawaguchi §, Shawn C. Burgess {ddagger}, Craig R. Malloy {ddagger} § and A. Dean Sherry {ddagger} || **

From the {ddagger}The Mary Nell and Ralph B. Rogers Magnetic Resonance Center, Department of Radiology and the Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235, the §Veterans Affairs North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, Texas 75216, and the ||Department of Chemistry, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75083

Received for publication, February 28, 2003 , and in revised form, May 9, 2003.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The generally accepted metabolic concept that fructose 2,6-bisphosphate (Fru-2,6-P2) inhibits gluconeogenesis by directly inhibiting fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase is based entirely on in vitro observations. To establish whether gluconeogenesis is indeed inhibited by Fru-2,6-P2 in intact animals, a novel NMR method was developed using [U-13C]glucose and 2H2O as tracers. The method was used to estimate the sources of plasma glucose from gastric absorption of oral [U-13C]glucose, from gluconeogenesis, and from glycogen in 24-h fasted rats. Liver Fru-2,6-P2 increased ~10-fold shortly after the glucose load, reached a maximum at 60 min, and then dropped to base-line levels by 150 min. The gastric contribution to plasma glucose reached ~50% at 30 min after the glucose load and gradually decreased thereafter. Although the contribution of glycogen to plasma glucose was small, glucose formed from gluconeogenesis was substantial throughout the study period even when liver Fru-2,6-P2 was high. Liver glycogen repletion was also brisk throughout the study period, reaching ~30 µmol/g at 3 h. These data demonstrate that Fru-2,6-P2 does not inhibit gluconeogenesis significantly in vivo.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Plasma glucose is preserved by gluconeogenesis after exhaustion of glycogen stores during a moderate fast. Following an oral glucose load, gluconeogenesis is thought to be modulated by allosteric regulation of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (1). This is an eminently satisfying model because a key regulatory site in glycolysis and gluconeogenesis occurs at level of fructose-6-P and fructose-1,6-P2 (Fig. 1). Phosphofructokinase-1, the glycolytic enzyme, is potently activated by fructose-2,6-P2, whereas fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase, the gluconeogenic enzyme, is thought to be inhibited by this same effector molecule (2, 3). Thus, by regulating the activities of phosphofructo-1-kinase and fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase in a reciprocal manner, Fru-2,6-P2 is thought to serve as an elegant regulator of glucose usage/production by the liver after an oral glucose load.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
Metabolic pathways and sources of deuterium enrichment. In the presence of 2H2O, glucose derived from glycogen will be enriched at H2 (assumes rapid equilibration between Glc-6-P and Fru-6-P), whereas glucose coming from gluconeogenesis will also be enriched at H5. Enzymes: PF-1-k, phosphofructo-1-kinase; PF-2-k, phosphofructo-2-kinase; F-2,6-P2ase, fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase; F-1,6-P2ase, fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase. TCA, tricarboxylic acid; DHAP, dihydroxy-acetone phosphate.

 

This generally accepted model is based on kinetic analysis of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase in vitro, which shows that Fru-2,6-P2 competes with Fru-1,6-P2 for the active site of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase and that both molecules have similar affinity constants, 1–5 µM (46). However, the in vivo concentrations of Fru-1,6-P2 in fasted and fed livers are 20 and 35 µM, respectively, whereas those of Fru-2,6-P2 are 1 and 8 µM, respectively (79). This suggests that it would be difficult for Fru-2,6-P2 to have a significant direct effect on fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase activity in vivo based simply upon concentration differences. Some evidence has been presented that suggests Fru-2,6-P2 is not a potent inhibitor of gluconeogenesis in intact animals. For example, Kuwajima et al. (10) reported continual production of liver glycogen in sucrose-fed rats despite high levels of Fru-2,6-P2, and Hue and Bartrons (11) observed stimulated glucose production by glucagon in isolated hepatocytes regardless of the levels of Fru-2,6-P2. Levels of Fru-2,6-P2 have also been manipulated by recombinant adenovirus overexpression of the bifunctional enzyme phosphofructo-2-kinase:fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase (the enzyme that catalyzes both synthesis and degradation of Fru-2,6-P2) in mice and rats in vivo (1214). Here, increased hepatic Fru-2,6-P2 in vivo actually resulted in increased glycogen synthesis from [1-13C]glucose via the indirect pathway (14), thereby suggesting that activation of glycolysis by Fru-2,6-P2 is more important than inhibition of glyconeogenesis in vivo. The relationship between glucose production by liver and hepatic [Fru-2,6-P2] after an oral glucose load typical of that used in a tolerance test (OGTT)1 is even less well defined. It has also been shown that hepatic glucose output in 24–30-h fasted rats is not suppressed after an oral glucose load (15, 16), but [Fru-2,6-P2] was not measured.

Continual production of glucose by the liver may play a role in diabetes, and so a simple method to detect persistent gluconeogenesis after an oral glucose load or after administration of a hypoglycemic agent may assist in therapy of this epidemic disease (17). Numerous methods to monitor sources of plasma glucose have been described. Classical metabolite balance studies across the liver or across the entire splanchnic circulation are not optimal because measuring hepatic glucose production requires access to the portal vein, and analysis of splanchnic glucose balance is limited by uncertainties about glucose uptake in the gut. Detection of hepatic glycogen by 13C NMR offers direct, noninvasive, and serial measurements of hepatic glycogen mobilization, but the method is not widely available and is difficult to apply to small animals without prelabeling of hepatic glycogen. Sophisticated isotope tracer studies rely on incorporation of 13C gluconeogenic precursors into plasma glucose, incorporation of deuterium or tritium from body water into specific sites in plasma glucose, or the redistribution of 13C label within plasma glucose molecules (18). These methods assume metabolic steady state and require metabolic models of variable sophistication.

The present study had two purposes: 1) to distinguish the sources of plasma glucose (gastric absorption, gluconeogenesis, glycogenolysis) in fasted rats during an oral glucose load using a simple combination of 13C and 2H tracers; and 2) to determine whether hepatic Fru-2,6-P2, elevated after an oral glucose load, alters the contribution of gluconeogenesis to plasma glucose. Here, a combination of 1H and J-resolved heteronuclear single quantum coherence (J-HSQC) spectroscopy was used to evaluate the contributions of hepatic versus gastric glucose over time following an oral glucose load, whereas 2H enrichments at the H5 versus H2 positions of plasma glucose as determined by 2H NMR gave a direct measure of the glycogenolysis versus gluconeogenesis contributions to plasma glucose. The data show that gluconeogenesis is not inhibited significantly in vivo following a glucose load in 24-h starved rats and that gluconeogenesis remains active even when Fru-2,6-P2 is elevated 10-fold.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Protocol—The study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. Male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 100–140 g (120 ± 9 g) were fasted for 24 h with free access to water. To initiate the study (t = 0), a bolus of glucose (2 g/kg; enriched with [U-13C]glucose to 5 or 10%) was administered by oral gavage, and 2 ml of 2H2O (99.9%; Cambridge Isotopes, Andover, MA) was injected into the intraperitoneal cavity. This was done without anesthesia. At 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, or 180 min, the animals were anesthetized by ether inhalation, a small portion of liver (0.2–0.3 g) was immediately freeze-clamped, and as much blood as possible (~2–3 ml) was collected from the descending aorta into a heparinized syringe. Following exsanguination, the remaining liver tissue was also quickly freeze-clamped. Assays for hepatic metabolites were performed on the first small section of liver, whereas the larger freeze-clamped portion was used to isolate liver glycogen. The blood was centrifuged and the plasma divided into 3 aliquots; 10 µl was used to assay for glucose, 10 µl for a 2H2O enrichment measurement, and the remaining plasma for isolation of glucose for NMR spectroscopy. A separate group of animals was studied to determine the 2H enrichment pattern in blood glucose in the absence of a glucose load; these rats received only 2 ml of 2H2O and were sacrificed at 50 min.

Analytical Procedures—Whole blood was immediately centrifuged, and the plasma was separated and deproteinized with perchloric acid (70%), neutralized with KOH solution, and lyophilized. Plasma glucose was converted to monoacetone glucose (MAG) using the method of Landau et al. (19). The lyophilized extract was suspended in 1.0 ml of acetone containing 40 µl of concentrated sulfuric acid and stirred at room temperature for 5 h. The pH of the mixture was adjusted with 50% NaOH until it became mildly basic. The acetone supernatant was transferred into another tube, and the remaining precipitate was washed three times using 1-ml aliquots of acetone. The supernatant and washings were combined and evaporated under a stream of dry nitrogen gas. The resulting dried residue was suspended in 5 ml of water, adjusted to pH 2.0 with dilute HCl, and incubated at 40 °C for 5 h. Thereafter, the solution was adjusted to pH 8.0 with NaOH and lyophilized.

Glycogen was extracted from the liver and purified as described previously (20). Isolated glycogen was dissolved in 5 ml of 10 mM sodium acetate solution (pH 5) and hydrolyzed by incubating for 4 h at 50 °C with 20 units of amyloglucosidase (Sigma). After freeze-drying, the glucose was converted to MAG as described above.

NMR Spectroscopy—MAG derived from plasma glucose was dissolved into 180 µl of 90% acetonitrile, 10% deuterium-depleted water (Cambridge Isotopes) along with a few grains of sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3). 2H NMR spectra were collected at 50 °C using a Varian INOVA 14.1 T spectrometer (Varian Instruments, Palo Alto, CA) equipped with 3-mm broadband probe tuned to 2H (92.1 MHz). Shimming was performed by visual inspection of select 1H resonances of MAG using the decoupler coil for detection. Proton-decoupled 2H NMR spectra were acquired using a 90° pulse and a sweep width of 920 Hz and 1984 digitized points. Typical 2H spectra required the sum of 5,000–20,000 scans. Proton decoupling was performed using a standard WALTZ-16 pulse sequence.

1H NMR and J-HSQC spectra were obtained on MAG dissolved in 120 µl of acetonitrile (natural abundance), 20 µl of deionized water, and 40 µl of deuterated acetonitrile to provide a 2H lock. All 1H and J-HSQC spectra were collected using a 3-mm inverse probe (Nalorac, Inc. Martinez, CA) on the same spectrometer. 1H NMR spectra were acquired using a 90° pulse and a 1-s interpulse delay, averaged over 64 scans (the acetonitrile signal was presaturated using a frequency selective pulse). The J-HSQC sequence using REBURP-shaped refocusing pulses was described previously (21). The 180° null method was used to determine the 1H90° pulse width, and the null of the acetonitrile 13C satellites was used to determine the 13C 90° pulse width. A spectral width of 4000 Hz digitized into 2394 points was used for the 1H dimension (F2), whereas 64 increments covering a spectral width of 120 Hz were used for the 13C dimension (F1).

13C NMR spectra of hepatic glutamate (purified from liver extracts) were obtained in 2H2O using a Varian INOVA 11.75 T spectrometer (Varian Instruments) equipped with a 5-mm broadband probe. Proton-decoupled spectra were acquired over 28,000 Hz (sweep width) digitized into 16,000 points using a 45° pulse and a 4-s interpulse delay. Spectra were typically averaged over 10,000 to 40,000 scans.

2H Enrichment in Plasma Water—The 2H enrichment of plasma water was determined as described previously (22). Proton-decoupled 2H NMR spectra (128 scans) were acquired using a 30° pulse and a sweep width of 920 Hz digitized into 3776 points. An interpulse delay of 8 s was used to avoid partial saturation effects. 2H spectra were collected on acetone samples (990 µl) containing 10 µl of plasma. The percent 2H in plasma water was determined by comparing the areas of the H2O/acetone resonances with resonance areas measured in a series of standards. Standards were prepared with 2H enrichments ranging from 0 to 2.5% using 2H2O (99.9%) and natural abundance water.

Analysis of Spectra—The 2H resonance intensities in spectra of MAG were determined by Bayesian analysis (Varian Instruments) of the raw time domain data. Peak areas in all other NMR spectra were measured after Fourier transformation by using the line-fitting subroutine in the PC-based NMR spectral analysis program, NUTSTM (Acorn NMR Inc., Freemont, CA).

Plasma Glucose Originating from the Oral Load: 13C Analysis—At each time point after an oral glucose load, it was assumed that plasma glucose resulted from a combination of gastric absorption, glycogenolysis, and gluconeogenesis from trioses. Given that the oral glucose contained 5% [U-13C]glucose, the probability that two [U-13C3]triose units originally derived from oral glucose recombined to form [U-13C]glucose is at most 0.25% (0.05 x 0.05 less the amount of label lost as a result of entry into the tricarboxylic acid cycle). Thus, it was assumed that all [U-13C]glucose present in plasma glucose originated from gastric absorption of oral glucose and not from partial degradation and recombination.

The fraction of plasma glucose with an enriched 13C at carbon 1 (g,as defined in Equation 1) was determined by 1H NMR as the fraction of the doublet (because of JCH coupling) in the H1 resonance. Algebraically, this is expressed as

(Eq. 1)
The contribution of [U-13C]glucose to this fraction was determined from multiplet areas in the J-HSQC spectrum where the coupling constant J1,3 is small but both J1,2 and J1,5 are easily detected. We assumed that any molecule with enrichment in carbon 1, carbon 2, and carbon 5 must reflect [U-13C]glucose. Therefore, the fraction of C-1-enriched glucose contributed by [U-13C]glucose (h) is defined as

(Eq. 2)
To illustrate one example of these calculations, the fraction of plasma glucose enriched in carbon 1 (g) was 0.041 as determined by the 1H NMR spectrum of MAG (not shown). A J-HSQC spectrum of the same sample (Fig. 2, spectrum at 30 min) indicates that the fraction of glucose labeled in C-1 contributed by [U-13C]glucose (h) was 0.59, and the fraction of glucose that was [1,2-13C2]- or [1,2,3-13C3]glucose (i) was 0.12. From these data, the fraction of plasma glucose that is [U-13C]glucose is g x h = 0.041 x 0.59 = 0.02419. However, in this sample the oral glucose contained only 5% [U-13C]glucose, and so the fraction of plasma glucose originating from the stomach, Fgastric, was (g x h)/0.05 or 48%. Because total plasma glucose measured 15.8 mM, then 7.6 mM originated from oral glucose.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
H1–C1 projections of J-HSQC spectra of monoacetone glucose converted from plasma glucose of rats sacrificed at 30-min interval after a 5% [U-13C]glucose load and intraperitoneal injection of 2H2O. Q, quartet due to coupling between C-1 and C-2 plus C-1 and C-5; D12, doublet, due to coupling between C-1 and C-2; S, singlet, due to natural abundance of 13C plus any singly labeled glucose generated in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. A shaded circle represents 13C, and an open circle represents 12C.

 

Plasma Glucose Originating from Glycogenolysis or Gluconeogenesis: 2H NMR Analysis—From the combined information in the 1H and J-HSQC spectra, one can conclude that about half of plasma glucose arose from gastric absorption of oral glucose. The remaining glucose resulted from either degradation of glycogen or gluconeogenesis, and this is reported in the 2H NMR spectrum of MAG (23) as

(Eq. 3)

(Eq. 4)

Integration of 2H and 13C Tracer Observations—Together, these spectra allow a measure of the sources of plasma glucose.

(Eq. 5)

(Eq. 6)

(Eq. 7)
where Fgastric + Fglycogen + Fgluconeogenesis = 1. For example, the 2H spectrum in Fig. 3 indicates that the contribution of glycogen to hepatic glucose production was 1–(H5/H2) = 0.18. Thus, the fraction of plasma glucose that originated from glycogen 30 min after the oral glucose load was (0.18)(1–0.48) or 9.4%. The assumptions that underlie this calculation are reviewed under "Discussion."



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
2H NMR spectrum of monoacetone glucose derived from plasma glucose isolated from a rat sacrificed at 60 min after a 5% [U-13C]glucose load and intraperitoneal injection of 2H2O. The inset shows H5/H2 ratio as measured by 2H NMR as a function of time after the oral glucose load. Each point represents means ± S.D. for 3–5 measurements.

 

Metabolite Assays—Freeze-clamped liver was homogenized in 0.1 N NaOH solution, and the supernatant was incubated at 80 °C for 5 min after centrifugation. Fru-2,6-P2 was assayed by taking advantage of the sensitivity of pyrophosphate:fructose-6-phosphate phosphotransferase to Fru-2,6-P2 as described by Van Schaftingen et al. (24). Liver glycogen was assayed enzymatically (25), and plasma glucose was measured using a HemoCue glucose analyzer (HemoCue AB, Angelholm, Sweden).

Statistical Analysis—The data are expressed as means ± S.D. using Microsoft Excel. Linear regression analysis for standard curves was also performed with the same program.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Influence of an Oral Glucose Load on Liver Fru-2,6-P2 and Other Metabolites—The influence of the oral glucose load on hepatic glycogen, Fru-2,6-P2, and plasma glucose is shown in Fig. 4. Plasma glucose peaked at 30 min after the glucose load and decreased gradually thereafter. Liver glycogen was low in 24-h fasted animals but was gradually replenished throughout the study period, reaching a maximum of 31.5 µmol/g at 3 h. This was a significant increase compared with time zero but considerably below the normal level in fed rats (~200 µmol/g) (26). Fru-2,6-P2 also increased significantly after the glucose load (Fig. 4). The initial concentration prior to glucose administration was 0.4 ± 0.3 nmol/g of liver, but this was followed by a ~10-fold increase by 30 min after the glucose load. The time courses of hepatic Fru-2,6-P2 and plasma glucose were roughly parallel. Finally, the amount of 2H2O in plasma water (1.6–1.8%) did not change significantly throughout the study period (Fig. 4).



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
Liver glycogen (µmol/g wet weight), liver Fru-2,6-P2 (nmol/g wet weight), plasma glucose (mM), and 2H enrichment in plasma water as a function of time after an oral glucose load in 24-h fasted rats. At t = 0, animals were given an oral glucose load and injected intraperitoneally with a bolus of 2H2O. Animals were then sacrificed at each time point to collect the data shown. Each point represents the mean ± S.D. for three measurements.

 

The plasma glucose concentration was somewhat higher than expected for a typical OGTT. Earlier studies (27) used indwelling venous catheters for blood drawing in conscious animals, in contrast to our study, in which the liver was removed from anesthetized animals. Therefore, in a smaller group of 24-h fasted rats, glucose (2 g/kg body weight) containing natural abundance levels of 13C was dissolved in H2O and administered by oral gavage, 2 ml of 2H2O was injected into the intraperitoneal cavity, and blood was withdrawn at various time points via the tail vein in the complete absence of anesthesia. In this group, plasma glucose peaked at 7.5 mM at 30 min and decreased to ~6mM by 180 min (data not shown). This indicates that the high plasma glucose levels reported in Fig. 4 may be attributed in part to the known effects of anesthesia (28, 29).

Effects of an Oral Glucose Load on the 1H, J-HSQC, and 2H Spectra—High resolution 1H NMR spectra of monoacetone glucose showed a fully resolved H1 resonance with well resolved 13C satellite peaks (not shown). The total areas of the 13C satellite wings in these spectra were typically ~3–4% or ~7–8% for rats given an oral glucose load containing either 5% [U-13C]glucose or 10% enriched glucose, respectively. The H1 projection of typical J-HSQC spectrum is shown in Fig. 2. Here, the peak labeled quartet (Q) is the dominant multiplet. At a minimum, this glucose isotopomer must be enriched in C-1, C-2, and C-5, and thus it represents [U-13C]glucose from oral glucose that has not undergone metabolism. The doublet (D12) is the signal from glucose isotopomers with 13C at C-1 and C-2 representing [1,2,3-13C3]- or [1,2-13C2]glucose. D12 reflects oral glucose that had been taken either to the level of a triose or the citric acid cycle before being resynthesized to glucose. The singlet (S) represents glucose isotopomers with 13C only at C-1. This peak has contributions from naturally abundant glucose and from singly enriched isotopomers derived from the citric acid cycle. As illustrated in Fig. 2, the Q fraction in these spectra was maximal at 30 min and decreased gradually thereafter, whereas the D12 fraction was minimal at 30 min and increased thereafter.

Intraperitoneal injection of 2H2O resulted in rapid equilibration (within 30 min) of 2H into plasma water to a level of 1.6–1.8% excess enrichment (Fig. 4). 2H incorporation into glucose has been reported to occur at various steps along the gluconeogenic and glycogenolytic pathways (Fig. 1), and the 2H spectrum of MAG provides a convenient readout of those exchanges. In the 24-h fasted animals prior to oral glucose, an H5/H2 ratio of 0.79 ± 0.17 indicated that 79% of all plasma glucose containing 2H was produced via gluconeogenesis, whereas the remaining ~21% came from glycogen. Somewhat surprisingly, the deuterium spectrum did not change significantly after the oral glucose load. The H5/H2 ratio remained relatively constant (0.8 ± 0.2) throughout the study period (Fig. 3, inset), again suggesting that ~80% of all plasma glucose containing 2H was produced via gluconeogenesis. That portion of plasma glucose arising from the oral load would not be detected by 2H NMR in this experiment unless glucose cycling between plasma and liver was active. The 2H NMR spectra of MAG derived from liver glycogen isolated at 120–180 min also confirmed that hepatic glycogen was derived via gluconeogenesis (H5/H2 = 0.90 ± 0.05).

Sources of Plasma Glucose—The contributions of oral glucose, gluconeogenesis, and glycogenolysis to plasma glucose pools are summarized in Fig. 5. At 30 min, about half of the plasma glucose originated from oral glucose, and its contribution decreased gradually thereafter. The gluconeogenic contribution to plasma glucose was substantial throughout the study period (~5.5–6.7 mM), whereas the contribution of glycogenolysis to plasma glucose was ~2mM and constant throughout the study period.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.
Changes in contributions of oral glucose (open bar), gluconeogenesis (cross-hatched), and glycogenolysis (shaded) to plasma glucose based upon analysis of the C-1 projections of J-HSQC and 2H NMR spectra. The height of each bar represents the mean ± S.D. for 3–5 measurements.

 


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The purpose of this study was to measure sources of plasma glucose after a gastric load and to determine whether the contribution of gluconeogenesis to hepatic glucose production is suppressed by increased hepatic Fru-2,6-P2. Based on early in vitro reports that Fru-2,6-P2 inhibits fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase, it is now standard teaching (30) that this inhibition holds true in vivo as well. The 2H NMR results of Fig. 3 show that gluconeogenesis continues even in the presence of substantially increased levels of hepatic Fru-2,6-P2 (Fig. 4), and thus inhibition of gluconeogenesis by Fru-2,6-P2 does not appear to be important in vivo. This result is consistent with a recent report showing that increasing hepatic levels of Fru-2,6-P2 by overexpression of the kinase isoform of phosphofructo-2-kinase resulted in increased glycogen synthesis from [1-13C]glucose via the indirect pathway (14). This result indicates that Fru-2,6-P2 stimulates glycolysis in vivo but does not inhibit production of glycogen via the indirect pathway. The current investigation also demonstrated that gluconeogenesis is not inhibited substantially after an oral glucose load typical of an OGTT even though liver Fru-2,6-P2 was increased ~10-fold above fasting levels. This indicates that any inhibition of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase by Fru-2,6-P2 in the in vivo rat liver is not enough to alter gluconeogenesis.

Plasma glucose reached higher levels than expected at 30 min post-oral glucose and did not return to pre-oral glucose levels even at 180 min. Thus, the curve shown in Fig. 4 is somewhat elevated compared with that observed for an OGTT in conscious animals (27). Dohm et al. (31) reported that both methoxyflurane (inhalation) and Innovar (intramuscular injection) induce glycogenolysis in rats, with the effect being higher in fed animals than in fasted animals. Thus, the somewhat enhanced levels of plasma glucose found here during the OGTT likely resulted from increased glycogenolysis during exposure of the animals to ether prior to collection of plasma glucose. Increased glycogenolysis, however, does not detract from the primary conclusion of this study because any glycogen degraded in response to anesthesia was synthesized de novo during the OGTT (see Fig. 4, bottom panel). The observation that the H5/H2 ratio in MAG derived from liver glycogen at 180 min was similar to that of plasma glucose demonstrates that gluconeogenesis contributed equally to both. Thus, any glycogenolysis that may have occurred during the short period of anesthesia would have reported the same H5/H2 ratio.

The NMR method reported here for detecting persistent gluconeogenesis requires three reasonable assumptions. First, all glucose isotopomers enriched in 13C at carbons 1, 2, and 5 reflect only [U-13C]glucose from oral glucose. The chance that this group of isotopomers could arise from [U-13C]glucose resynthesized after metabolism to a triose is small. If the entire oral glucose load was metabolized to a triose and resynthesized, the chances of [U-13C]glucose reforming would be at best 0.25%, if oral glucose consisted of 5% [U-13C]glucose, and at most 1%, if oral glucose consisted of 10% [U-13C]glucose. This lower limit would be reduced even further in vivo because of dilution of the triose pools by endogenous gluconeogenic precursors. It was also assumed that plasma glucose only arises from three possible sources: gastric absorption, liver glycogenolysis, or liver gluconeogenesis. This assumption excludes other organs as origins of endogenous glucose production. The kidney is also a gluconeogenic organ, but its contribution to blood glucose is not considered significant except during unusual circumstances such as prolonged fasting or acidosis (32, 33). A third assumption was that the 2H labeling in glucose reflected recent glucose synthesis. Within 30 min after an oral glucose load, glucose turnover increases from about 15 mg/kg/min at base line to more than 50 mg/kg/min (15). Although glucose turnover was not measured in this study, the gluconeogenic contribution to plasma glucose at 30 min after the oral glucose and 2H2O loads was already significant. Consequently, the gluconeogenic contribution at later time points must also reflect the metabolic activity of each individual time point rather than an accumulated result over the previous periods. Further evidence for rapid glucose turnover is shown by the rapid decline in [U-13C]glucose (originating in the oral load) observed in plasma (Fig. 5), consistent with the high turnover of glucose reported in earlier studies of oral glucose loading in rats (15).

Perturbation of glucose metabolism with an oral load continues to attract interest because it is thought that the post-prandial state accounts for much of the duration of hyperglycemia in patients with diabetes, and because the OGTT is a standard method for diagnosis of abnormalities in carbohydrate metabolism. Despite intensive work, the fate of oral glucose remains surprisingly controversial. Reports of the cumulative appearance of oral glucose in plasma have varied from about 70% (34, 35) to nearly 100% (36, 37), and the maximal rates of glucose appearance have varied about 2-fold. Livesey et al. (36) reported a study of glucose kinetics in 12-h fasted humans after an oral glucose load, using stable isotopes and mass spectrometry to detect gastric absorption of [13C6]glucose oral glucose. They report that the contribution of hepatic glucose to plasma glucose began to decrease shortly after the oral load from an initial value of near 5 mM to a nadir of 1.1 mM (36), suggesting that gluconeogenesis may be more highly regulated in humans after an oral glucose load. However, that study differed from ours in two respects. First, the contribution of hepatic glucose production to plasma glucose was not measured directly but rather was obtained by difference between total plasma glucose (measured analytically) and plasma glucose derived from the oral load (measured as M + 6 by mass spectrometry). It is important to point out that this method cannot distinguish hepatic glucose production from glycogenolysis versus gluconeogenesis, and it is well known that substantial liver glycogen remains after a short 12-h fast in humans. In our experiments with rats, liver glycogen was low after a 24-h fast, and gluconeogenesis was measured directly using the combined 13C and 2H tracers. This has allowed us to demonstrate that gluconeogenesis is not altered after an oral glucose load in this animal model. These study differences emphasize the need to apply simple tracer methods such as the method demonstrated here to assess post-prandial glucose metabolism in humans. The method reported here could easily be applied during an OGTT in humans. A dual isotope technique commonly used for the measurement of oral or endogenous glucose appearance (3840) requires intravenous infusion at a constant rate of glucose tracer ([3H]glucose) and a glucose load of the other tracer ([14C]glucose). In comparison, the approach presented here requires only ingestion of [U-13C]glucose (and 2H2O), yet provides detailed information about the sources of plasma glucose. Such a study in humans could be especially timely because persistent hepatic glucose production after a meal may be an attractive therapeutic target for diabetic patients (17).


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (RR-02584, DK-16194, HL-34557) and by Merit Review support from the Department of Veterans Affairs. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

** To whom correspondence should be addressed: Mary Nell and Ralph B. Rogers Magnetic Resonance Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5801 Forest Park Rd., Dallas, TX 75235-9085. Tel.: 214-648-5886; Fax: 214-648-5881; E-mail: dean.sherry{at}utsouthwestern.edu.

1 The abbreviations used are: OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; J-HSQC, J-resolved heteronuclear single quantum coherence; MAG, monoacetone glucose. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We appreciate the review of this manuscript by Dr. Brian Weis.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Ruderman, N. B., Aoki, T. T., and Cahill, G. F. (1976) in Gluconeogenesis: Its Regulation in Mammalian Species (Hanson, R. W., and Mehlman, M. A., eds) pp. 515–532, John Wiley and Sons, New York
  2. Pilkis, S. J., El-Maghrabi, M. R., McGrane, M. M., Pilkis, J., and Claus, T. H. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 11489–11495[Free Full Text]
  3. McGrane, M. M., El-maghrabi, M. R., and Pilkis, S. J. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 10445–10454[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Pilkis, S. J., El-Maghrabi, M. R., Pilkis, J., and Claus, T. H. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 3619–3622[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Kitajima, S., and Uyeda, K. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 7352–7357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Van Schaftingen, E., and Hers, H. G. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 78, 2861–2863[Abstract]
  7. Thomas, H., and Uyeda, K. (1986) Anal. Biochem. 154, 50–56[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Kuwajima, M., and Uyeda, K. (1982) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 104, 84–88[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Lawson, J. W. R., Guynn, R. W., Cornell, N., and Veech, R. L. (1976) in Gluconeogenesis: Its Regulation in Mammalian Species (Hanson, R. W., and Mehlman, M. A., eds) John Wiley and Sons, New York
  10. Kuwajima, M., Golden, S., Katz, J., Unger, R. H., Foster, D. W., and McGarry, J. D. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 2632–2637[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Hue, L., and Bartrons, R. (1984) Biochem. J. 218, 165–170[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Wu C., Okar, D. A., Newgard, C. B., and Lange, A. J. (2001) J. Clin. Invest. 107, 91–98[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Wu C., Okar, D. A., Newgard, C. B., Lange, A. J. (2002) Am. J. Physiol. 282, E38–E45
  14. Choi I. Y., Wu, C., Okar, D. A., Lange, A. J., and Gruetter, R. (2002) Eur. J. Biochem. 269, 4418–4426[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Smadja, C., Morin, J., Ferre, P., and Girard, J. (1990) Biochem. J. 270, 505–510[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Niewoehner, C. B., Gilboe, D. P., and Nuttall, F. Q. (1984) Am. J. Physiol. 246, E89–E94[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Staehr, P., Hother-Nielsen, O., and Beck-Nielsen, H. (2002) Diabetes Obes. Metab. 4, 215–223[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Katz, J., Wals, P., and Lee, W. N. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 25509–25521[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Landau, B. R., Wahren, J., Chandramouli, V., Schumann, W. C., Ekberg, K., and Kalhan, S. C. (1995) J. Clin. Invest. 95, 172–178[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Moriwaki, T., and Landau, B. R. (1963) Endocrinology 72, 134–145
  21. Burgess, S. C., Carvalho, R. A., Merritt, M. E., Jones, J. G., Malloy, C. R., and Sherry, A. D. (2001) Anal. Biochem. 289, 187–195[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Jones, J. G., Merritt, M. E., and Malloy, C. R. (2001) Magn. Reson. Med. 45, 156–158[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Jones, J. G., Solomon, M. A., Cole, S. M., Sherry, A. D., and Malloy, C. R. (2001) Am. J. Physiol. 281, E848–E856
  24. Van Schaftingen, E., Lederer, B., Bartrons, R., and Hers, H. G. (1982) Eur. J. Biochem. 129, 191–195[Abstract]
  25. Keppler, D., and Decker, K. (1994) Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, pp. 1127–1131, Academic Press, New York
  26. Bergmeyer, H. U. (1974) Method of Enzymatic Analysis, Vol. 4, 2nd Ed., p. 2267, Academic Press, New York
  27. O'Doherty R. M., Jensen, P. B., Anderson, P., Jones, J. G., Berman, H. K., Kearney, D., and Newgard, C. B. (2000) J. Clin. Invest. 105, 47
  28. van Herck, H., Baumans, V. de Boer, S. F., van der Gugten, J., van Woerkim, A. B., and Beynen, A. C. (1991) Lab. Anim. 25, 325–329[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Perez-Llamas, F., Zamora, S., Rosique, M. J., and Sastre, J. F. (1992) Arch. Int. Physiol. Biochim. Biophys. 100, 335–337[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Stryer, L. (1995) Biochemistry, 4th Ed., p. 575, W. H. Freeman and Company, New York
  31. Dohm, G. L., Tapscott, E. B., and Garris, D. R. (1983) Biochem. Med. 30, 157–161[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Ekberg, K., Landau, B. R., Wajngot, A., Chandramouli, V., Efendic, S., Brunengraber, H., and Wahren, J. (1999) Diabetes 48, 292–298[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Gerich, J. E., Meyer, C., Woerle, H. J., and Stumvoll, M. (2001) Diabetes Care 24, 382–391[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Delarue, J., Couet, C., Cohen, R., Bréchot, J.-F., Antoine, J.-M., and Lamisse, F. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 270, E353–E362[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Mitrakou, A., Kelley, D., Veneman, T., Jenssen, T., Pangburn, T., Reilly, J., and Gerich, J. (1990) Diabetes 39, 1381–1390[Abstract]
  36. Livesey, G. P., Wilson, D. G., Dainty, J. R., Brown, J. C., Faulks, R. M., Roe, M. A., Newman, T. A., Eagles, J., Mellon, F. A., and Greenwood, R. H. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 275, E717–E728[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Firth, R. G., Bell, P. M., Marsh, H. M., Hansen, I., and Rizza, R. A. (1986) J. Clin. Invest. 77, 1525–1532[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Ferrannini, E., Bjorkman, O., Reichard, G. A., Jr., Pilo, A., Olsson, M., Wahren, J., and DeFronzo, R. A. (1985) Diabetes 34, 580–588[Abstract]
  39. Ferrannini, E., Simonson, D. C., Katz, L. D., Reichard, G. A., Jr., Bevilacqua, S., Barrett, E. J., Olsson, M., and DeFronzo, R. A. (1988) Metabolism 37, 79–85[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Kruszynska, Y. T., Meyer-Alber, A., Darakhshan, F., Home, P. D., and McIntyre, N. (1993) J. Clin. Invest. 91, 1057–1066[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]