Mechanism of Loading the Escherichia coli DNA Polymerase III beta  Sliding Clamp on DNA

BONA FIDE PRIMER/TEMPLATES PREFERENTIALLY TRIGGER THE gamma  COMPLEX TO HYDROLYZE ATP AND LOAD THE CLAMP*

Brandon AsonDagger §, Renita HandayaniDagger , Christopher R. WilliamsDagger , Jeffrey G. Bertram||, Manju M. Hingorani**Dagger Dagger , Mike O'DonnellDagger Dagger , Myron F. Goodman||, and Linda B. BloomDagger §§

From the Dagger  Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610-0245, || Department of Biological Sciences and Chemistry, Hedco Molecular Biology Laboratories, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-1340, and Dagger Dagger  Rockefeller University and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, New York, New York 10021

Received for publication, November 18, 2002, and in revised form, January 2, 2003

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III gamma  complex clamp loader assembles the ring-shaped beta  sliding clamp onto DNA. The core polymerase is tethered to the template by beta , enabling processive replication of the genome. Here we investigate the DNA substrate specificity of the clamp-loading reaction by measuring the pre-steady-state kinetics of DNA binding and ATP hydrolysis using elongation-proficient and deficient primer/template DNA. The ATP-bound clamp loader binds both elongation-proficient and deficient DNA substrates either in the presence or absence of beta . However, elongation-proficient DNA preferentially triggers gamma  complex to release beta  onto DNA with concomitant hydrolysis of ATP. Binding to elongation-proficient DNA converts the gamma  complex from a high affinity ATP-bound state to an ADP-bound state having a 105-fold lower affinity for DNA. Steady-state binding assays are misleading, suggesting that gamma  complex binds much more avidly to non-extendable primer/template DNA because recycling to the high affinity binding state is rate-limiting. Pre-steady-state rotational anisotropy data reveal a dynamic association-dissociation of gamma  complex with extendable primer/templates leading to the diametrically opposite conclusion. The strongly favored dynamic recognition of extendable DNA does not require the presence of beta . Thus, the gamma  complex uses ATP binding and hydrolysis as a mechanism for modulating its interaction with DNA in which the ATP-bound form binds with high affinity to DNA but elongation-proficient DNA substrates preferentially trigger hydrolysis of ATP and conversion to a low affinity state.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In the absence of processivity proteins, synthesis by DNA polymerases is relatively inefficient because of repeated DNA dissociation and rebinding events. Sliding clamps alleviate this problem by encircling DNA and tethering polymerases to the DNA templates to dramatically enhance the processivity of synthesis. The Escherichia coli beta  sliding clamp is composed of two identical crescent-shaped subunits that form a ring in solution (1, 2). The clamp does not spontaneously load onto DNA but requires the activity of a clamp loader for assembly. Clamp loaders perform the mechanical task of opening clamps and depositing them on DNA templates (3). The binding and hydrolysis of ATP drive this assembly reaction.

The E. coli clamp loader is composed of five different subunits, three copies of the dnaX gene product (gamma  and/or tau ), delta , delta ', chi , and psi  (4-7). The dnaX gene produces two polypeptides, a full-length gene product, tau , and a truncated gene product, gamma , approximately two-thirds the length of tau  (8-10). The C-terminal region of tau  interacts with the alpha  subunit of the polymerase and supports the formation of a DNA polymerase III holoenzyme complex in vivo that contains two core polymerases and a clamp loader consisting of tau 2gamma delta delta 'chi psi (11-13). Both tau  and gamma  contain ATP binding sites and are capable of functioning in fully active clamp-loading complexes referred to as the tau  (tau 3delta delta 'chi psi ) and gamma  (gamma 3delta delta 'chi psi ) complexes, respectively (5, 14). ATP binding by the clamp loader induces a conformational change that exposes the binding sites for the beta  clamp (15) and DNA (16). Hydrolysis of ATP is coupled to the release of the clamp on DNA and most probably produces a conformational change that masks binding sites for beta  and DNA (17, 18). Thus, ATP binding and hydrolysis modulate gamma  complex-beta and gamma  complex-DNA interactions during the clamp-loading cycle.

This paper addresses a key question regarding the E. coli clamp-loading reaction. How does the E. coli clamp loader target the beta  clamps to the correct sites on DNA? Ideally, DNA replication would be most efficient if the clamp loader assembled clamps onto primed templates at primer 3' ends. This DNA substrate specificity could be achieved if the clamp loader had a high affinity for ss/ds1 junctions at primer 3' ends. However, the DNA polymerase must also bind to these ss/ds junctions so the clamp loader would compete with the polymerase for binding and reduce the efficiency of DNA synthesis. This competition would be particularly detrimental on the lagging strand where clamps must be loaded for every one- to two-kilobase Okazaki fragment that is synthesized. The clamp loader does in fact have a high affinity for ss/ds DNA junctions at primer 3' ends, but these sites trigger a change in the gamma  complex causing it to release DNA (16). The clamp loader then exists in a state with reduced affinity for DNA. This DNA-induced decrease in affinity provides a mechanism that prevents the clamp loader from competing with the polymerase for loaded clamps. It also could provide a dynamic mechanism for recognition of sites for loading beta  where only the appropriate sites trigger the loading reaction. In this paper, we investigate the DNA structural features required to trigger gamma  complex to release the clamp and DNA and show that the presence of an elongation-proficient p/t DNA substrate is absolutely necessary to trigger gamma  complex to hydrolyze ATP and release the clamp.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Enzymes-- All of DNA polymerase III proteins were purified, and gamma  complex was reconstituted as described previously (1, 5) and stored in 20 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.5, 2 mM DTT, 0.5 mM EDTA, and 10% glycerol. Assay buffers for all of the experiments contained 8 mM MgCl2 in 20 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM DTT, and 40 µg/ml BSA.

Oligonucleotides-- Synthetic oligonucleotides were made on an ABI 392 DNA synthesizer using standard beta -cyanoethylphosphoramidite chemistry and reagents from Glen Research (Sterling, VA). DNA was purified by denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. A 105-nucleotide template with the sequence shown as follows was used in all of the experiments: 5'-GAG CGT CAA AAT GTA GGT ATT TCC AtG AGC GTT TTT CCt GTT GCA ATG GCT GGC GGT AAT ATT GTT CTG GAT ATT ACC AGC AAG GCC GAT AGT TTG AGT TCT TCT-3'.

Amino modifiers were incorporated into this template to allow for site-specific labeling with X-rhodamine isothiocyanate (catalog number X-491, Molecular Probes) as described previously (19, 20). These amino modifiers were positioned at three separate sites for control experiments to demonstrate that binding results were not affected by the position of the X-rhodamine (RhX) probe. Two modifiers were located on T at positions 26 and 39 (amino modifier C2dT, Glen Research) indicated by lowercase letters, and the third modifier was located on the 5'-terminal hydroxyl (amino modifier C6, Glen Research).

Three 30-nucleotide primers that are complementary to different sites on this 105-mer (see Fig. 1) were annealed separately by incubating 1.2 equivalents of primer and with 1 equivalent of template in 20 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.5, and 50 mM NaCl at 80 °C for 5 min and then slowly cooling to room temperature. Annealed p/ts were used without further purification because we previously demonstrated that a small excess of primer had no effect on loading reactions (16).

Steady-state Fluorescence Anisotropy Measurements-- Steady-state anisotropy measurements were taken using a QuantaMaster QM-1 fluorometer (Photon Technology International, London, Ontario, Canada) as described previously (16). Titration experiments were performed by the addition of a constant volume of gamma  complex solution to a cuvette containing a solution of RhX-labeled DNA and assay buffer. Assays contained variable amounts of gamma  complex and 50 nM RhX-labeled DNA and 0.5 mM ATP in assay buffer. Binding experiments were performed with RhX probes located at three different sites, and the results were not influenced by the site of labeling (data not shown).

Competition Binding Assays-- The binding of gamma  complex to a mixture of labeled and unlabeled DNA was initiated by the addition of ATP as described previously (16). After the addition of ATP, solutions contained 50 nM RhX-labeled ss 50-mer, 400 nM gamma  complex, 0-500 nM unlabeled competitor DNA, and 0.5 mM ATP in assay buffer.

Pre-steady-state Fluorescence Anisotropy Measurements-- Assays were performed using a Biologic SFM-4 stopped-flow (Molecular Kinetics, Pullman, WA) equipped with four independently driven reagent syringes and a 30-µl cuvette (model FC-15) with a 1.5-mm path length as described previously (16). One stopped flow syringe was loaded with 480 nM gamma  complex, 0.5 mM ATP, and 1 µM beta  dimer (when present) in assay buffer. The second syringe was loaded with 100 nM DNA and 0.5 mM ATP in assay buffer. Reactions were initiated by mixing 80 µl of gamma  complex solution with 80 µl of DNA solution at a flow rate of 10 ml/s at 20 °C. The reaction dead time under these mixing conditions was 3.7 ± 0.7 ms as determined using the method described by Peterman (21). Vertically and horizontally polarized emission intensities were measured at 1-ms intervals, and 16-24 stopped flow runs were signal-averaged. Raw anisotropy data were fit to sums of exponentials and used in kinetics simulations. Data shown in Fig. 3 have been smoothed over 3 data points. As a control, pre-steady-state experiments with the 3' center p/t were done with the probe at three different sites to demonstrate that the results were not influenced by the site of labeling (data not shown).

Pre-steady-state ATPase Assays-- E. coli phosphate-binding protein covalently labeled at Cys-197 with N-[2-(1-maleimidyl)ethyl]-7-(diethylamino)coumarin-3-carboxamide was used to quantitate inorganic phosphate released by ATP hydrolysis in real time as described previously (17). An Applied Photophysics SX.18MV stopped-flow was used. A "three-syringe" experiment was performed by loading one syringe with 0.97 µM gamma  complex and 1.2 µM beta  dimer (when present), a second syringe with 20 µM MDCC-PBP and 800 µM ATP, and a third syringe with 0.6 µM unlabeled DNA. The contents of the first two syringes were mixed to pre-incubate gamma  complex and beta  dimer when present with ATP for 1 s prior to adding DNA from the third syringe. The computer-calculated dead time was 1.5 ms.

Combined Analysis of DNA Binding and ATP Hydrolysis Kinetics-- Kinetics of ATP hydrolysis and DNA binding were measured separately in reactions containing 260 nM gamma  complex and 450 nM DNA in assay buffer. ATPase assays contained 200 µM ATP and 5 µM MDCC-PBP, and anisotropy binding assays contained 200 µM ATP. Both experiments were done in the Applied Photophysics stopped-flow using a mixing scheme where gamma  complex was pre-incubated with ATP for 1 s prior to adding DNA (and MDCC-PBP in ATPase assays).

These reaction kinetics were simulated by the model shown in Fig. 5C using KINSIM (22). The same model and associated rate constants were used to simulate both data sets and output the concentration of PBP-MDCC bound to Pi and the anisotropy of RhX on DNA. The observed anisotropy (robs) at any time (t) was calculated using Equation 1 where rf and rb represent the anisotropy of free and bound DNA, respectively, and xf and xb represent the fraction of free and bound DNA as a function of reaction time.
r<SUB><UP>obs</UP></SUB>(t)=<UP>r<SUB>f</SUB> × </UP>x<SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB>(t)+<UP>r<SUB>b</SUB> × </UP>x<SUB><UP>b</UP></SUB>(t) (Eq. 1)

The experimentally determined anisotropy for free DNA (rf = 0.19) was used. An anisotropy of 0.32 was used for bound DNA (rb). This value represents the increase in anisotropy observed when DNA is saturated with either beta  and gamma  complex or with single-stranded binding protein.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Binding of gamma  Complex to DNA Substrates with Primers Located at Different Sites-- The anisotropy of RhX covalently attached to DNA substrates was used to "report" on binding interactions with the gamma  complex. In these experiments, the increase in anisotropy of RhX in the presence of increasing concentrations of gamma  complex was measured under steady-state binding conditions. Three partially duplex DNA substrates were made by annealing three separate primers, 30 nucleotides in length, to different sites on a 105-nt-long template (see Fig. 1). Each of these DNAs were covalently labeled with RhX at position 5 of a template T located 39 nucleotides from the 5' end. Two substrates, the 5'-blunt p/t and center p/t, have 5'-template overhangs and support primer extension by a DNA polymerase (elongation-proficient). The third substrate, 3'-blunt p/t, positions the primer 3' end at a blunt duplex end and cannot be extended by a DNA polymerase (elongation-deficient).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Steady-state anisotropy binding assays measuring the affinity of the clamp loader for DNA substrates primed at different sites. Each of the DNA substrates (50 nM) containing ss/ds junctions was titrated with gamma  complex (0-1600 nM). The increase in anisotropy for the RhX probe on DNA is plotted as a function of gamma  complex concentration for the 5'-blunt p/t substrate (filled triangles), center p/t substrate (open squares), and 3'-blunt substrate (filled circles). The DNA template is labeled with RhX on T at position 39. Assay buffer contained 500 µM ATP and 8 mM MgCl2 in 20 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 40 µg/ml BSA, and 5 mM DTT.

When gamma  complex (0-1600 nM) was titrated into a solution containing 50 nM DNA substrate and 500 µM ATP, a relatively large increase in anisotropy was observed for the 3'-blunt p/t substrate, whereas smaller increases were observed for the 5'-blunt and center p/t substrates (Fig. 1). These results seem to indicate that the apparent affinity of gamma  complex is greater for the 3'-blunt p/t substrate that is not extendable by DNA polymerases. However, earlier work (16) with the center p/t substrate revealed that gamma  complex does in fact bind with high affinity to this substrate under pre-steady-state conditions. This interaction with the center p/t substrate converts gamma  complex from a high affinity to a low affinity binding state so that only a small population of DNA is bound at steady state.

Competition Binding Assays-- Competition binding assays were used to measure the ability of each of the p/t substrates to compete with a single-stranded DNA substrate for gamma  complex binding. Increasing concentrations of unlabeled p/t competitor were added to a solution of gamma  complex (400 nM) and ss 50-mer DNA (50 nM) covalently labeled with RhX. As the concentration of competitor DNA was increased, the fraction of gamma  complex bound to the ss 50-mer decreased in each case (Fig. 2). However, the 5'-blunt and center p/ts more effectively competed with the ss 50-mer for gamma  complex than the 3'-blunt p/t substrate. These results apparently contradict those of direct binding assays (Fig. 1), which suggested that gamma  complex binds the 5'-blunt and center p/ts more weakly. Together, these steady-state binding assays indicate that the gamma  complex interacts with the 5'-blunt and center p/t substrates in the similar manner but interacts differently with the 3'-blunt substrate.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Ability of partially duplex DNA substrates to compete with a single-stranded 50-mer for gamma  complex binding. The binding of gamma  complex (400 nM) to a ss 50-mer (50 nM) that was 5'-end-labeled with RhX was measured in the presence of increasing concentrations (0-400 nM) of unlabeled competitor DNA. The fraction of labeled 50-mer that remained bound by gamma  complex was plotted as a function of concentration of unlabeled 5'-blunt p/t (filled triangles), center p/t (open squares), and 3'-blunt p/t (filled circles) competitors. Assay buffer contained 500 µM ATP and 8 mM MgCl2 in 20 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 40 µg/ml BSA, and 5 mM DTT.

Kinetics of gamma  Complex Binding to Different DNA Substrates-- Pre-steady-state anisotropy measurements were made to examine the dynamic nature of the binding interactions between gamma  complex and various p/t DNA substrates including ss DNA. In the absence of beta  clamp, initial rapid increases in anisotropy indicated that gamma -complex bound rapidly to each of the four DNA substrates. However, two different types of binding kinetics were observed for elongation-proficient and deficient substrates. For the elongation-proficient 5'-blunt p/t (Fig. 3A, -beta ) and center p/t (Fig. 3B, -beta ) substrates, a rapid increase in anisotropy over the first 50 ms was followed by a slower decrease in anisotropy over approximately the next 250 ms. At steady state in the absence of the beta  clamp, the anisotropy was barely above that of free DNA (light gray), indicating that only an extremely small fraction of DNA was bound. These binding kinetics are consistent with a reaction cycle in which an activated gamma  complex rapidly binds DNA; the interaction with DNA inactivates gamma  complex, converting it to a state with reduced affinity for DNA; and the gamma -complex slowly reverts back to the activated DNA binding state (16).


View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Kinetics of gamma  complex binding to DNA and loading beta  clamps on DNA. Solutions of gamma  complex were pre-incubated with ATP in the presence or absence of the beta  clamp prior to the addition of each of the three p/t DNA substrates and a ss 105-mer substrate. Binding kinetics are plotted in separate graphs for the 5'-blunt p/t (A), the center p/t (B), the 3'-blunt p/t (C), and the ss 105-mer (D) where each graph shows three plots of anisotropy as a function of time. In each case, the dark gray plot showing the greatest increase in anisotropy is the kinetics of loading of beta  onto DNA, the dark gray plot showing a small increase in anisotropy is the kinetics gamma  complex binding DNA, and the light gray plot showing no change in anisotropy is free a DNA control generated by the addition of buffer only. Smooth black lines through the data represent empirical fits to the sums of exponentials. Final concentrations were 240 nM gamma  complex, 50 nM DNA, 500 µM ATP, 8 mM MgCl2, and 500 nM beta  clamp when present in 20 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 40 µg/ml BSA, and 5 mM DTT. The three p/t substrates (A-C) were labeled with RhX on the template on T at position 26, and the ss 105-mer was 5'-end-labeled with RhX.

In contrast, time courses for binding reactions with the elongation-deficient 3'-blunt p/t (Fig. 3C, -beta ) and ss 105-mer DNA (Fig. 3D, -beta ) showed a rapid increase in anisotropy but little or no decrease in anisotropy. The reaction with the 3'-blunt p/t showed a slight decrease in anisotropy but not nearly the magnitude observed for the 5'-blunt or center p/t DNA. The higher anisotropy values seen in the steady-state regime of these reactions indicate that a greater fraction of DNA was bound by gamma  complex. These DNA substrates do not seem to efficiently trigger the gamma  complex to release DNA and convert to a low affinity DNA binding state.

This dynamic interaction with elongation-proficient DNA substrates is not an artifact of performing assays in the absence of the beta  clamp but part of the clamp-loading reaction. Similar results were obtained in loading reactions where the beta  clamp was present. In assays containing beta  and the elongation-proficient 5'-blunt (Fig. 3A, +beta ) and center (Fig. 3B, +beta ) p/t DNA, a rapid increase in anisotropy attributed to beta ·gamma complex binding followed by a slower decrease attributed to the release of the clamp on DNA and dissociation of gamma  complex was observed. Because the clamp has been loaded onto DNA, anisotropy values remain higher at steady state than in reactions without the clamp. In reactions with the 3'-blunt p/t (Fig. 3C, +beta ) and ss 105-mer (Fig. 3D, +beta ), a rapid increase in anisotropy to a constant value was observed, which is consistent with an equilibrium binding interaction of the beta ·gamma complex with these DNA substrates rather than DNA-triggered release of the clamp on DNA. Time courses for reactions containing elongation-deficient DNA substrates and ATP (Fig. 3, C and D) resemble those done previously with elongation-proficient DNA substrates in the presence of non-hydrolyzable ATPgamma S where clamp release does not occur (23). The magnitude of the increase in anisotropy was greater in reactions with beta  than without beta . This difference in amplitudes is consistent with the model presented below where an equilibrium population of approximately 40% of the gamma  complex is present in a conformation that is active for DNA binding in the absence of beta .

Kinetics of ATP Hydrolysis in the Presence of Different DNA Substrates-- The anisotropy data show that DNA substrates suitable for polymerase extension induce a change in gamma  complex that reduces its affinity for DNA, whereas elongation-deficient DNA substrates do not. The kinetics of ATP hydrolysis in assays with each of the four DNA substrates were measured to determine whether they also differed for extendable DNA substrates compared with non-extendable substrates. A real time fluorescence-based assay was used to quantitate the concentration of inorganic phosphate released on hydrolysis of ATP (24). This assay uses E. coli phosphate-binding protein (PBP), which avidly binds inorganic phosphate. When PBP is covalently labeled with a coumarin fluorophore (MDCC-PBP), phosphate binding produces an increase in fluorescence of the probe.

DNA substrates capable of supporting synthesis by a DNA polymerase gave different time courses for ATP hydrolysis than those that could not. In assays without the beta  clamp, the first turnover of ATP was rapid relative to the steady-state turnover for the extendable 5'-blunt and center p/ts (Fig. 4A). The first turnover was biphasic with the combined amplitudes indicating that three ATP molecules were hydrolyzed for every molecule of gamma  complex present. The kinetics of ATP hydrolysis in assays with the non-extendable 3'-blunt p/t and ss 105-mer differed significantly. They lacked a "burst" of ATP hydrolysis and showed only a linear increase in Pi release at a rate of 0.92 µM/s.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Kinetics of ATP hydrolysis by gamma  complex in the presence and absence of the beta  clamp. The concentration of MDCC-PBP bound to inorganic phosphate released by hydrolysis of ATP is plotted as a function of time. A, reactions with gamma  complex alone. B, reactions with gamma  complex in the presence of beta . The dotted gray line in each graph represents the concentration of Pi expected for the hydrolysis of three molecules of ATP per molecule of gamma  complex. Reactions done in both the presence and absence of beta  show a rapid increase in Pi release followed by a slow steady-state release for 5'-blunt (black) and center (gray) p/t substrates, whereas reactions with the 3'-blunt p/t (black) and ss DNA (gray) show a linear steady-state release of Pi. Assays were performed by pre-incubating a solution of gamma  complex (240 nM), ATP (200 µM), MgCl2 (8 mM), and beta  (300 nM, when present) for 1 s prior to adding a solution of DNA (300 nM) and MDCC-PBP (5 µM) to give final concentrations indicated in 20 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 40 µg/ml BSA, and 5 mM DTT.

The addition of beta  to assays containing the extendable 5'-blunt and center p/ts increased the overall rate of the first ATP turnover by gamma  complex (Fig. 4B). Three molecules of ATP (3.2 based on amplitudes) per molecule of gamma  complex were hydrolyzed in a single rapid phase taking approximately 150-200 ms to complete compared with 600-700 ms in the absence of beta  (Fig. 4A). The increased rate was attributable primarily to the disappearance of the slower second pre-steady-state phase seen in assays with gamma  complex only. No burst and a linear increase in Pi release was observed at rates of 1.2 and 1.0 µM/s for the elongation-deficient 3'-blunt p/t and ss DNA, respectively, in assays with gamma  complex and beta . The presence of beta  did not significantly increase the rate of ATP hydrolysis for non-extendable substrates, suggesting that hydrolysis is not coupled to a productive loading reaction (17).

Combined Analysis of ATP Hydrolysis and DNA Binding and Release Kinetics-- To determine whether the burst of ATP hydrolysis seen in the reaction with the center p/t was associated with the release of DNA, pre-steady-state kinetics of DNA binding and ATP hydrolysis were measured in assays under identical reaction conditions. The center rather than 5'-blunt p/t DNA was chosen for purely technical reasons to more closely examine the relationship of ATP hydrolysis to the gamma  complex-binding and release reactions. This center p/t is typically used in all of our assays and allows us to compare these results with those of other studies. These experiments were performed with an excess of DNA over gamma  complex so that every clamp loader could bind DNA and hydrolyze ATP in the first turnover.

Time courses for ATP hydrolysis and DNA binding showed similar features as those in Figs. 3 and 4. Rapid biphasic hydrolysis of ATP followed by a slower steady-state hydrolysis was observed in the ATPase assay. A concomitant rapid increase in anisotropy followed by a decrease to the level of free DNA was observed in the anisotropy binding assay (Fig. 5, A and B). A combined analysis of these two data sets allows us to determine the timing of ATP hydrolysis relative to DNA binding and release. DNA binding occurs prior to ATP hydrolysis, but ATP hydrolysis occurs prior to DNA release. A kinetic model for the binding of gamma  complex, hydrolysis of ATP, and release of the extendable p/t DNA including rate constants for each reaction (Fig. 5C) was used to simulate pre-steady-state anisotropy binding and ATP hydrolysis data (Fig. 5, A and B). The solid lines through the data points were obtained from simulation of this model using KINSIM (Fig. 5C) (22).


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Correlation between hydrolysis of ATP and release of DNA by gamma  complex. ATPase and DNA binding assays were performed by pre-incubating gamma  complex and ATP for 1 s prior to adding DNA (and MDCC-PBP in ATPase assays). Final concentrations were 0.26 µM gamma  complex, 0.45 µM center p/t DNA (5'-end-labeled with RhX on the template), 200 µM ATP, and 8 mM MgCl2 and 5 µM MDCC-PBP (in ATPase assays only) in assay buffer. The concentration of MDCC-PBP bound to inorganic phosphate (left axis) and the anisotropy of RhX on DNA (right axis) are plotted as a function of time. Data over a time range of 1.5 s are shown in A, and data on an expanded scale of 0.6 s are shown in B. Solid lines through the data were obtained from simulation of the kinetic model shown in C. In this model, gamma c·T·T·T represents gamma  complex bound to 3 molecules of ATP (T) that is inactive for binding DNA, gamma c*·T·T·T represents gamma  complex bound to three ATPs that is active for DNA binding, N represents DNA; D represents ADP, and P represents inorganic phosphate. Rate constants used in the simulation are indicated for each step. Experimentally determined rate constants for inorganic phosphate binding to and dissociating from PBP-MDCC (24) were included.

The rapid biphasic release of Pi by gamma  complex could be because of the presence of non-equivalent sites where individual gamma  subunits hydrolyze ATP at two different rates. Alternatively, the biphasic kinetics could result from two populations of gamma  complex in equilibrium where one population exists in a conformation that is active for DNA binding and rapidly hydrolyzes all three molecules of ATP at the same rate. The second population is initially inactive for DNA binding and ATP hydrolysis but can slowly convert to the active form, which gives rise to the slow phase of Pi release. Our model assumes the second case in which gamma  complex exists as an equilibrium mixture of two different conformational states as supported by unpublished data.2 Following ATP hydrolysis, the ADP-bound form of gamma  complex rapidly releases DNA.

The kinetic simulation starts with an equilibrium mixture of gamma  complex that is active (40% gamma c*·T·T·T) and inactive for DNA binding (60% gamma c·T·T·T).2 The exact nature of these two species is not defined by this experiment, and it is assumed that they both contain three molecules of ATP. However, it is also formally possible that binding one or more ATP molecules converts the inactive state to active state. Under these experimental conditions where saturating ATP concentrations were used, we cannot distinguish between these two possibilities. The active state of gamma  complex (gamma c*·T·T·T) binds DNA and hydrolyzes all three molecules of ATP sequentially at the same rate before rapidly dissociating from DNA. The inactive form of gamma  complex slowly (2.7 s-1) converts to the active form where it binds DNA and hydrolyzes its ATP prior to releasing DNA.

These assays (Fig. 5) provide information regarding the kinetics of the first turnover but less about subsequent turnovers where the rates of ADP release from gamma  complex and ATP binding come in to play. For this reason, we have combined these steps into one first-order reaction where the ADP-bound form of gamma  complex is converted to the ATP-bound form and used apparent rate constants to model the steady-state portion of the reaction. This first-order approximation is a reasonable approach because the ATP concentration is saturating and <1% ATP is converted to ADP over the time course of the reaction so that the ATP concentration effectively remains constant. Finally, because Pi release could not be observed until it bound MDCC-PBP, we included rate constants for this Pi binding step (24) in our model.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The E. coli clamp loader accomplishes the mechanical task of assembling the ring-shaped beta  clamp onto DNA. Our results show that the clamp loader uses a dynamic mechanism to target clamps specifically to DNA substrates that can serve as templates for synthesis by DNA polymerases (Fig. 6). Primed template DNA substrates that contain a ss/ds junction with the correct polarity for extension by a DNA polymerase, which is 3'-primer end with a 5'-template overhang, efficiently trigger hydrolysis of ATP and release of DNA by the clamp loader (Figs. 3, A and B, and 4, A and B). The gamma  complex is also able to bind non-extendable 3'-blunt-end p/t DNA and ss DNA in either the presence or absence of beta  but, in contrast, fails to release beta  on the DNA (Fig. 3, C and D) and fails to exhibit a pre-steady-state burst of ATP hydrolysis (Fig. 4, A and B). These data are completely consistent with our previous data showing that ATP hydrolysis is also associated with release of the clamp (17). Thus, the appropriate sites on DNA for clamp assembly trigger the clamp loader to hydrolyze ATP and release the clamp on DNA. These studies provide a mechanistic explanation for earlier observations that gamma  complex selectively loads clamps at ss/ds junctions with a 5'-ss overhang (25).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   gamma Complex uses a dynamic mechanism for targeting clamps to sites where DNA synthesis is slated to begin. In both the presence and absence of the beta  clamp, ATP-bound gamma  complex binds with high affinity to extendable and non-extendable DNA substrates. However, extendable DNA substrates trigger gamma  complex to hydrolyze ATP and release the clamp on DNA. Thus, gamma  complex uses a dynamic mechanism for recognition of extendable primers where those sites preferentially trigger the loading reaction.

A key result is that steady-state measurements of direct binding interactions between gamma  complex and different DNA substrates can be misleading by apparently demonstrating that the gamma  complex binds with greater affinity to DNA substrates that are not extendable by DNA polymerase. Real time anisotropy binding assays were key to uncovering the dynamic nature of the interaction of gamma  complex with DNA constructs that can serve as substrates for DNA polymerases. These assays show a rapid increase in anisotropy followed by a slower decrease when gamma  complex binds to extendable DNA substrates containing ss/ds junctions with a 5'-ss overhang (Fig. 3, A and B). A "simple" equilibrium-binding reaction of gamma  complex to DNA would have shown an increase in anisotropy to a value that represented the equilibrium population of DNA bound by gamma  complex (i.e. a simple exponential rise) as observed in assays with ss DNA alone and 3'-blunt p/t DNA containing beta  (Fig. 3, C and D). The decrease in anisotropy in assays with elongation-proficient p/t substrates having a 5'-ss overhang indicated that a new state of gamma  complex with reduced affinity for DNA forms during the binding reaction. Because the rate-limiting step in the steady-state reaction is recycling of this low affinity DNA binding state to the high affinity state (Fig. 5C), very little DNA is bound, giving the appearance that the affinity of gamma  complex for elongation-proficient DNA is low. DNA p/ts that are not extendable do not efficiently trigger the conversion of gamma  complex to the low affinity state and thus give the appearance that they are bound with greater affinity in steady-state assays. It is likely that this low affinity DNA binding state is an ADP-bound form of gamma  complex based on the results from ATPase assays. This dynamic DNA binding interaction is also likely to occur with the eukaryotic clamp loader (replication factor C). Stronger binding interactions with an extendable p/t were seen in steady-state assays with non-hydrolyzable ATPgamma S than in assays with ATP (26).

The gamma  complex has long been known to have DNA-dependent ATPase activity. More recently, the ATP requirements for individual steps in the clamp-loading reaction have been defined. ATP binding but not hydrolysis is required for DNA binding activity (16, 20) and clamp binding activity (15, 27) of the gamma  complex. A conformational change in the clamp loader that exposes sites for binding both DNA and the clamp is most probably produced by ATP binding. The hydrolysis of ATP is required for the release of the clamp on DNA (17, 18, 23). Here we show that hydrolysis of ATP is dependent on the structural features of the DNA substrate. DNA structures that can be extended by a DNA polymerase, the 5'-blunt p/t, and center p/t efficiently trigger a pre-steady-state burst of ATP hydrolysis, whereas those that cannot be extended, the 3'-blunt and ss DNA, do not (Fig. 4).

A combined analysis of DNA binding and ATP hydrolysis assays done under identical conditions in the absence of the beta  clamp revealed that gamma  complex initially binds DNA prior to ATP hydrolysis and subsequently hydrolyzes ATP before releasing DNA. This same sequence of events occurs in assays containing beta  that result in a productive loading reaction (17). Our results are consistent with a model (Fig. 5C) in which the gamma -complex cycles through a reaction where it has a high affinity for DNA, binds DNA, and then converts to a lower affinity state and releases DNA. The high affinity DNA binding state is an ATP-bound form of gamma  complex, and the low affinity state is an ADP-bound form. The kinetic parameters derived from this model suggest that the ATP-bound form of gamma  complex binds DNA with an affinity that is 105 times greater (2 nM) than the ADP-bound form (100 µM). Thus, the clamp loader uses ATP binding and hydrolysis as a means for modulating its interaction with DNA so that it has a high affinity before clamp loading and a low affinity afterward.

Taken together, these results demonstrate the gamma  complex uses a dynamic mechanism for targeting the beta  sliding clamp to template sites where DNA synthesis is slated to begin. The clamp loader binds DNA with high affinity, and those sites with an ss/ds junction of the correct polarity to be extended by a DNA polymerase efficiently trigger the clamp loader to hydrolyze ATP and release the clamp on DNA (Fig. 6). DNA-triggered hydrolysis of ATP converts the gamma  complex to a state most probably ADP-bound with lower affinity for DNA, thus providing a mechanism for targeting the clamp to the proper sites on DNA and for preventing the clamp loader from competing with the polymerase for primer/template ends. Coordination between the clamp loader and the polymerase is critical for DNA synthesis on the lagging strand where a clamp must be loaded for each of the 1-2-kilobase Okazaki fragments synthesized every 1-2 s by the polymerase. Pre-steady-state kinetic data show that the gamma  complex-catalyzed beta  clamp loading and release reactions occur rapidly (~12 s-1) (20) compared with the time scale for Okazaki fragment synthesis and, therefore, are not rate-limiting for Okazaki fragment synthesis. ATP binding and hydrolysis modulate the affinity of the clamp loader for DNA and the clamp so that it has a high affinity for both before the clamp is loaded and a low affinity for both after the clamp is loaded. This prevents competition between the clamp loader and core polymerase for clamps that have just been loaded on DNA. The dynamic nature of gamma  complex-DNA interactions is probably a common theme in DNA replication where many enzymes are required to work at the replication fork and each must have access to the DNA at the appropriate time.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants GM55596 (to L. B. B.), GM21422 (to M. F. G.), and GM38839 (to M. O.) and National Science Foundation Training Grant DBI-9602258.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Present address: Dept. of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706.

Dept. of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610.

** Depts. of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT 06459.

§§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 1600 S. W. Archer Rd., JHMHC Rm. R3-234, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0245. Tel.: 352-392-8708; Fax: 352-392-6511; E-mail: lbloom@ufl.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 8, 2003, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M211741200

2 C. R. Williams, A. Johnson, M. F. Goodman, M. O'Donnell, and L. B. Bloom, manuscript in preparation. The "two-state model" for the biphasic kinetics of ATP hydrolysis by gamma  complex in the absence of beta  provides a reasonable explanation for the effects of beta  on the kinetics of DNA binding and ATP hydrolysis. Our model assumes that beta , like DNA, only binds with high affinity to the "active" state of gamma  complex. Pre-incubation of beta  with gamma  complex and ATP would "trap" nearly all of the gamma  complex in the active DNA binding conformation by forming a beta ·gamma complex. This active beta ·gamma complex then rapidly binds DNA and hydrolyzes ATP. Because nearly all of the gamma  complex is present in the active beta ·gamma complex, the amplitude of the anisotropy rise in reactions with beta  increases relative to reactions without beta  of which a fraction (60%) of gamma  complex is initially in the inactive conformation. For the same reasons, reactions with beta  result in a single rapid phase of Pi release.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: ss/ds, single-stranded/double-stranded; p/t(s), primer/template(s); PBP, E. coli phosphate-binding protein; MDCC-PBP, PBP covalently labeled at Cys-197 with N-[2-(1-maleimidyl)ethyl]-7-(diethylamino)coumarin-3-carboxamide; RhX, X-rhodamine; ATPgamma S, adenosine 5'-O-(thiotriphosphate); DTT, dithiothreitol; BSA, bovine serum albumin.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Kong, X.-P., Onrust, R., O'Donnell, M., and Kuriyan, J. (1992) Cell 69, 425-437[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
2. Yao, N., Turner, J., Kelman, Z., Stukenberg, P. T., Dean, F., Shechter, D., Pan, Z.-Q., Hurwitz, J., and O'Donnell, M. (1996) Genes Cells 1, 101-113[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Bloom, L. B., and Goodman, M. F. (2001) Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 829-831[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Maki, S., and Kornberg, K. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 6555-6560[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Onrust, R., Finkelstein, J., Naktinis, V., Turner, J., Fang, L., and O'Donnell, M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13348-13357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Pritchard, A. E., Dallman, H. G., Glover, B. P., and McHenry, C. S. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 6536-6545[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Jeruzalmi, D., O'Donnell, M., and Kuriyan, J. (2001) Cell 106, 429-441[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Blinkowa, A. L., and Walker, J. R. (1990) Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 1725-1729[Abstract]
9. Tsuchihashi, Z., and Kornberg, A. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 2516-2520[Abstract]
10. Flower, A. M., and McHenry, C. S. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 3713-3717[Abstract]
11. Studwell-Vaughan, P. S., and O'Donnell, M. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 19833-19841[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Onrust, R., Finkelstein, J., Turner, J., Naktinis, V., and O'Donnell, M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13366-13377[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Dallmann, H. G., Kim, S., Pritchard, A. E., Marians, K. J., and McHenry, C. S. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 15512-15519[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Dallmann, H. G., and McHenry, C. S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 29563-29569[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Naktinis, V., Onrust, R., Fang, F., and O'Donnell, M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13358-13365[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Ason, B., Bertram, J. G., Hingorani, M. M., Beechem, J. M., O'Donnell, M., Goodman, M. F., and Bloom, L. B. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 3006-3015[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Bertram, J. G., Bloom, L. B., Hingorani, M. M., Beechem, J. M., O'Donnell, M., and Goodman, M. F. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 28413-28420[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Hingorani, M. M., Bloom, L. B., Goodman, M. F., and O'Donnell, M. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 5131-5144[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Perez-Howard, G. M., Weil, P. A., and Beechem, J. M. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 8005-8017[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Bloom, L. B., Turner, J., Kelman, Z., Beechem, J. M., O'Donnell, M., and Goodman, M. F. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 30699-30708[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Peterman, B. F. (1979) Anal. Biochem. 93, 442-444[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Barshop, B. S., Wrenn, R. F., and Frieden, C. (1983) Anal. Biochem. 130, 134-145[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Bertram, J. G., Bloom, L. B., Turner, J., O'Donnell, M., Beechem, J. M., and Goodman, M. F. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 24564-24574[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Brune, M., Hunter, J. L., Corrie, J. E. T., and Webb, M. R. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 8262-8271[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Yao, N., Leu, F. P., Anjelkovic, J., Turner, J., and O'Donnell, M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 11440-11450[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Gomes, X. V., and Burgers, P. M. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 34768-34775[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Hingorani, M. M., and O'Donnell, M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 24550-24563[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2003 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.