From Euroscreen, 802 Route de Lennik, 1070 Brussels, Belgium, ¶ Eurogentec, Parc Scientifique du Sart
Tilman, 4102 Seraing, Belgium,
Institute of
Interdisciplinary Research, School of Medicine, Université Libre
de Bruxelles, 808 Route de Lennik, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
Received for publication, June 27, 2002, and in revised form, October 24, 2002
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
GPR7 and GPR8 are two
structurally related orphan G protein-coupled receptors, presenting
high similarities with opioid and somatostatin receptors. Two peptides,
L8 and L8C, derived from a larger precursor, were recently described as
natural ligands for GPR8 (Mori, M., Shimomura, Y., Harada, M.,
Kurihara, M., Kitada, C., Asami, T., Matsumoto, Y., Adachi, Y.,
Watanabe, T., Sugo, T., and Abe, M. (December, 27, 2001) World Patent
Cooperation Treaty, Patent Application WO 01/98494A1). L8 is a
23-amino acid peptide, whereas L8C is the same peptide with a C
terminus extension of 7 amino acids, running through a dibasic motif of
proteolytic processing. Using as a query the amino acid sequence of the
L8 peptide, we have identified in DNA databases a human gene predicted to encode related peptides and its mouse ortholog. By analogy with L8
and L8C, two peptides, named L7 and L7C could result from the
processing of a 125-amino acid human precursor through the alternative
usage of a dibasic amino acid motif. The activity of these four
peptides was investigated on GPR7 and GPR8. In binding assays, L7, L7C,
L8, and L8C were found to bind with low nanomolar affinities to the
GPR7 and GPR8 receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1
cells. They inhibited forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation through a
pertussis toxin-sensitive mechanism. The tissue distribution of
prepro-L7 (ppL7) and prepro-L8 (ppL8) was investigated by reverse
transcription-PCR. Abundant ppL7 transcripts were found throughout the
brain as well as in spinal cord, spleen, testis, and placenta; ppL8
transcripts displayed a more restricted distribution in brain, with
high levels in substantia nigra, but were more abundant in peripheral
tissues. The ppL7 and ppL8 genes therefore
encode the precursors of a class of peptide ligands, active on two
receptor subtypes, GPR7 and GPR8. The distinct tissue distribution of
the receptor and peptide precursors suggest that each ligand and
receptor has partially overlapping but also specific roles in this
signaling system.
G protein-coupled receptors
(GPCRs)1 constitute one of
the largest gene families yet identified (2). Over the last decade, a
growing number of GPCRs have been made available by various cloning
procedures, among which PCR amplification using degenerate oligonucleotides, and more recently the systematic sequencing of
cDNA libraries and genomes, have played prominent roles. In addition to about 160 characterized receptors, about 125 human genes
encode proteins obviously belonging to this family of receptors, but
their ligands and functions remain to be determined. These so far
uncharacterized receptors are referred to as orphan GPCRs, but they are
expected to play, by analogy with characterized members of the family,
important roles in the regulation of physiological processes. From a
structural viewpoint, orphan receptors are widely distributed
throughout the GPCR superfamily, suggesting that they respond to a
diverse range of ligands. Their similarity with well known receptors
sometimes allows the construction of hypotheses regarding the chemical
nature of their ligand (e.g. peptide, lipid derivative). The
identification of their natural ligands can provide insight into new
regulatory mechanisms and represent interesting opportunities for drug
discovery (3).
Many of the presently characterized receptors have originally been
cloned as orphan receptors before the identification of their ligand
and the delineation of their function in vivo. As an
example, the 5HT1A serotonin receptor was first
cloned by cross-hybridization with a GPR7 and GPR8 are two human orphan GPCRs that were originally cloned
from genomic DNA by low stringency polymerase chain reaction (20).
Their genes are both intronless, and their amino acid sequences share
62% identity with each other (Fig. 1),
suggesting that they could share common ligands. They display
significant similarity to the opioid and somatostatin receptors
(36-40% identity), but the ligands of these receptors do not activate
cell lines expressing GPR7 or GPR8, despite the original description
that bremazocin, a high affinity synthetic opioid ligand, could
interact with GPR7 in a binding assay (20). GPR7 was mapped
to the 10q11.2-q21.1 region of the human genome, and GPR8 to
20q13.3.
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2-adrenergic
receptor probe (4), and its functional response to serotonin was
identified afterward (5, 6). Orphan receptors led in a number of cases
to the discovery of new molecules that were not recognized beforehand
as extracellular mediators. Nociceptin was the first of these novel
ligands to be described. It was purified from brain extracts with the
help of functional assays constructed around the orphan receptor ORL1
(7, 8). This process has been referred to as reverse pharmacology.
Other recent examples of new molecules identified by reverse
pharmacology include orexins (9), prolactin-releasing peptide (10), MCH (11, 12), apelin (13), relaxin (14), ghrelin (15), kisspeptin (16, 17),
and prokineticins (18). In addition to this approach based on the
purification of an activity from a biological sample, some peptide
ligands of orphan receptors have also been identified using
bioinformatics and searches in human genomic databases (19).
View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
A, alignment of human GPR7 and GPR8
amino acid sequences. Identical amino acids are indicated in
black, and similar amino acids are indicated in
gray. Putative transmembrane domains as predicted by
alignment with those from the crystal structure of the bovine rhodopsin
sequence (30) are overlined and labeled with
roman numerals. *, putative
N-glycosylation sites; §, potential phosphorylation
sites by protein kinase A; #, potential phosphorylation sites by
protein kinase C. Human GPR7 has accession number P48145, and human
GPR8 has accession number P48146. B, dendogram representing
the structural relatedness of the human GPR7 receptor with the closest
GPCR from the amino acid sequence alignment. Accession numbers are as
follows: human GPR7 (P48145), mouse GPR7 (XP_136404), human GPR8
(P48146), human DOP (P41143), human MOP (NP_000905.1), human KOP
(P41145), human sst1 (P30872), human sst2
(P30874), human sst3 (P32745), human sst4
(P31391), human sst5 (P35346), human MCH1 (Q99705), human
ORL-1 (S43087), human OX1R (O43613), human Y1 (P25929), human Y5
(Q15761), human GPR10 (P49683), and human MC4R (P32245).
GPR7 transcripts were found by Northern blotting in brain regions including cerebellum and frontal cortex and with lower abundance in hypothalamus and pituitary, where two different transcripts are present. In situ hybridization revealed expression of GPR7 in the human anterior pituitary, and, using a partial mouse GPR7 sequence, in mouse brain regions, namely suprachiasmatic, arcuate, and ventromedial nuclei of hypothalamus, the dentate gyrus and ventral tegmental area (20). In situ hybridization studies were later performed on rat brain, and GPR7 transcripts were found in amygdala, hippocampus, hypothalamus, and cortex regions, suggesting a more widespread distribution of GPR7 in rat brain than in mouse brain (21). GPR8 was shown to have a different expression profile, as illustrated by Northern blot analysis of various regions of human brain, in which GPR8 transcripts were essentially restricted to the frontal cortex (20). Interestingly, GPR8 was not found so far in rodents but was cloned in several other species, including rabbit, shrew, and lemur, indicating that the GPR8 gene might have been lost in some mammalian branches (21).
Ligands of GPR8 have been recently identified by reverse pharmacology,
using extracts from pig hypothalamus and a GTPS-based functional
assay, as reported (1). Two peptides of 23 (L8) and 30 (L8C) amino
acids were described, differing in their C-terminal extension (Fig. 2C). Injection
of this ligand into rats was reported to induce an increase in
prolactin release (1).
|
In the present study, we have identified, using bioinformatics, new
peptides predicted to derive from a secreted protein precursor and
structurally related to the L8 ligands. These peptides were shown to be
high affinity agonists for GPR7 but also for GPR8. The pharmacology of
these peptides was characterized, using binding and functional assays
and recombinant CHO-K1 cell lines expressing GPR7 or GPR8. In addition,
the expression profile of the genes expressing the two receptors and
the two peptide precursors, prepro-L7 and prepro-L8, was established by
RT-PCR for the first time in human tissues.
![]() |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Materials-- Culture media, antibiotics, fetal bovine serum, and trypsin were from BioWhittaker (Petit Rechain, Belgium). Restriction and DNA-modifying enzymes were from Roche Diagnostics. Forskolin and IBMX were from Calbiochem. Pertussis toxin was from Sigma.
Cloning of GPR7 and GPR8-- Oligonucleotide primers were synthesized on the basis of human GPR7 and GPR8 cDNA sequences (accession numbers U22491 and U22492, respectively) (20). For GPR7 cloning, sense primer 5'-CCGGGATCCACCATGGACAACGCCTCGTTCTCG-3' and antisense primer 5'-CTAGTCTAGATCAGGCTGCCGCGCGGCAAGT-3' were used in a PCR experiment using human genomic DNA as template and Pfu DNA Polymerase (Stratagene) under the following conditions: 94 °C, 15 s; 50 °C, 30 s; 72 °C, 1 min, 35 cycles. A fragment of 0.98 kilobases containing the entire coding sequence of the GPR7 gene was amplified, digested by BamHI and XbaI, and cloned in the pEFIN3 bicistronic expression vector (22). For GPR8 cloning, sense primer 5'-ATCGGAATTCCCAGCTACAATGCAGGCCGC-3' and antisense primer 5'-ATCGACTAGTGCCCAGGCCCTTCAGCACCG-3' were used in a PCR experiment using human genomic DNA as template and Taq DNA polymerase (Eurogentec, Liège, Belgium) under the following conditions: 94 °C, 15 s; 65 °C, 30 s; 72 °C, 1 min, 35 cycles. The amplified 1-kb fragment was digested by EcoRI and SpeI and cloned in pEFIN3. The inserts of the resulting plasmids were sequenced on both strands, using the BigDye Terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK). Sequence alignments were performed using ClustalX version 1.8 software (23). Putative transmembrane domains were predicted by TM_Pred (available on the World Wide Web at www.ch.embnet.org/software/TMPRED_form.html).
Cloning and Sequencing of Prepro-L7 (ppL7) cDNA-- Based on the sequence of the unique EST sequence containing a poly(A) tail (GenBankTM accession number BM978256), specific oligonucleotide primers were synthesized for L7 cDNA cloning (sense primer, 5'-gtaGAATTCcgccgcccaccagtcag-3'; antisense primer, 5'- taTCTAGAgcggtcccaggagaggtc-3'). Marathon-ready cDNAs from human adult and fetal brain (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) were used as a template for PCR amplification using Goldstar DNA Polymerase (Eurogentec) under the following conditions: 94 °C for 4 min; three cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 58 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 45 s; 30 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 63 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 45 s; and 72 °C for 3 min. The amplified fragments were cloned in a PCR-Blunt TOPO vector (Invitrogen) and were sequenced on both strands using the BigDye Terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems).
Identification and Synthesis of Putative GPR7 Ligands-- Using as a query the amino acid sequence of the L8 peptide, one of the GPR8 ligands described in the Patent Cooperation Treaty (1), we used TBLASTN and fasta software to search DNA databases. EST and genomic sequences presenting significant matches were collected, and proteins and peptides derived from these sequences were predicted. The peptides were synthesized using Fmoc (N-(9-fluorenyl)methoxycarbonyl) synthesis protocols with double or triple coupling reactions using O-benzothiazol-1-yl-N,N,N',N'-tetramethyl-uronium tetrafluoroborate (TBTU) as the activator on a Symphony (Rainin Instrument Co., Woburn, MA) synthesizer. Purifications were performed by reverse phase-HPLC on a Waters (Milford, MA) Delta-Pak C18 (15 µm, 100A, 25 × 100 mm) column using a Waters liquid chromatography system consisting of a model 600 solvent delivery pump, a Rheodine injector, and an automated gradient controller (solvent A, H2O plus 0.125% trifluoroacetic acid; solvent B, CH3CN plus 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid; gradient 15% B to 60% B in 20 min). Detection was carried out using a model M2487 variable wavelength UV detector connected to the Waters Millennium software control unit. The quality control was performed by analytical reverse phase-HPLC on a Waters Delta-Pak C18 (5 µm, 100A, 150 × 3.9 mm) column (solvent A, H2O plus 0.125% trifluoroacetic acid; solvent B, CH3CN plus 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid; gradient, 100% A to 60% B in 20 min) using a Waters Alliance 2690 separation module equipped with a Waters 996 Photodiode Array Detector and by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry using a PerSeptive Biosystems (Framinghan, MA) Voyager-DE instrument.
Cell Culture and Transfection--
The recombinant pEFIN3-GPR7
and pEFIN3-GPR8 plasmids and the empty pEFIN3 vector were
transfected in CHO-K1 cells (CRL-9618; ATCC, Manassas, VA) or WTA11
cells (a CHO-K1 cell line coexpressing mitochondrial apoaequorin and
G16), using Fugene 6 (Roche Diagnostics). The
transfected cells were selected with 400 µg/ml G418 in nutritious Ham's F-12 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin, from 2 days after transfection. The medium of WTA11 cells contained in addition 250 µg/ml zeocin. Cells expressing high levels of GPR7 were selected from
the mixture of transfected cells by using an anti-GPR7 antisera (see
below) and magnetic beads, as recommended by the supplier (Miltenyi
Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). Briefly, 2 million cells were
reacted with 5 µl of anti-GPR7 serum, and GPR7-positive cells were
recovered using goat anti-mouse IgG microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec) on a
miniMACS column. Sorted cells were grown, and clonal cell lines were
obtained by limiting dilution. Clones identified by
fluorescence-activated cell sorting as expressing GPR7 at the cell
surface, using the anti-GPR7 antiserum, were further analyzed by
Northern blotting and RT-PCR.
COS-7 cells were grown in DMEM containing 10% fetal calf serum, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin and transfected using LipofectAMINE 2000 (Invitrogen), with the pEFIN3 plasmids encoding GPR7 or GPR8 and a
pcDNA3 plasmid encoding the Gqi5 chimeric protein,
consisting of the mouse G
q protein in which the last
five amino acids are replaced by the corresponding sequence of
G
i2 (24). The cells were used in functional assays 2 days after transfection.
Production of Antibodies Directed against GPR7-- BALB/C mice were injected three times with 100 µg of the pEFIN3-GPR7 plasmid, as previously described (25). Sera were tested by fluorescence-activated cell sorting using GPR7-transfected WTA11 cells and fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG antibodies (Sigma).
Aequorin Assays-- Functional responses were analyzed by recording the luminescence of aequorin in GPR7- and GPR8-expressing cells following the addition of (potential) agonists, as previously described (16). In brief, cells were collected from plates with PBS containing 5 mM EDTA, pelleted, resuspended at 5 × 106 cells/ml in DMEM/F-12 medium containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin, incubated with 5 µM coelenterazine H (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, OR) for 4 h at room temperature, and diluted in DMEM/F-12 medium at a concentration of 5 × 105 cells/ml. Cells where then mixed with the ligands, and the light emission was recorded over 30 s using a MicrolumatTM luminometer (PerkinElmer Life Sciences).
Phosphoinositide Accumulation Assays-- COS-7 cells expressing GPR7 or GPR8 were labeled for 12 h with 3 µCi/ml [3H]inositol in inositol-free DMEM containing 5% fetal bovine serum. Cells were washed two times with Krebs-Ringer Hepes buffer (10 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 146 mM NaCl, 4.2 mM KCl, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 55 mM glucose) prior to the incubation with agonists at 37 °C for 30 min in Krebs-Ringer Hepes buffer containing 9.4 mM LiCl. The incubation was stopped by replacing the incubation medium with 1 ml of an ice-cold 5% perchloric acid solution. The medium was further neutralized with a 75 mM Hepes, 1.5 M KOH solution. The total inositol phosphate (IP) content was then extracted and purified on Dowex columns as described (26). Total radioactivity remaining in the membrane fraction was counted after solubilization in 10% Triton, 0.1 N NaOH and used as a standard for each well. Results were expressed as the radioactivity associated to IP over the total radioactivity present in membranes.
Cyclic AMP Assays-- CHO-K1 cell lines stably expressing GPR7 or GPR8 were cultured in Petri dishes at 37 °C in Ham's F-12 medium containing or not 100 ng/ml pertussis toxin. Cells were recovered in PBS containing 5 mM EDTA, resuspended in Krebs-Ringer Hepes/IBMX buffer (1.25 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.4, 5 mM KCl, 124 mM NaCl, 1.25 mM MgSO4, 1.45 mM CaCl2, 25 mM Hepes, 0.5 g/liter bovine serum albumin, 10 mg/liter phenol red, 1 mM IBMX, and 13.3 mM glucose) and dispatched into 96-well plates at a density of 2.5 × 104 cells/well. Cells were further preincubated for 15 min in 1 mM Krebs-Ringer Hepes/IBMX buffer and incubated with various concentrations of agonists for 20 min at 37 °C, with or without 5 µM forskolin. Incubations were terminated by the addition of lysis buffer (CS1000 kit; Applied Biosystems). The cell lysate was homogenized in the presence of cAMP-AP conjugate and an anti-cAMP-antibody, and cAMP content was quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (CS1000 kit; Applied Biosystems).
Binding Assays--
Iodinated L8 and L7 peptides were obtained
using the chloramine T labeling method (Zentech, Liége,
Belgium). Competition binding assays were performed as described (16)
on crude membrane fractions prepared from CHO-K1 cell lines expressing
GPR7 or GPR8. Briefly, 1-10 µg of membrane proteins were incubated
in binding buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 5 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 0.5%
protease-free bovine serum albumin) containing 0.1 nM
125I-L7 or 125I-L8 radioligand for 90 min at 27 °C. Bound tracer was separated by filtration through GF/B
filters (Millipore Corp.) presoaked in 0.5% polyethylenimine. Filters
were then counted by scintillation counting. Results were
normalized for total binding in the absence of competitor (100%) and
nonspecific binding (0%) in the presence of a 100-fold excess of
unlabeled ligand and were analyzed by nonlinear regression, using a
single site competition model (Graph-Pad Prism software).
Tissue Distribution of Human GPR7 and GPR8 Receptors and ppL7 and Prepro-L8 (ppL8) Precursors-- Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) experiments were carried out using a panel of poly(A)+ RNA (Clontech and Ambion, Austin, TX). The GPR7 primers were 5'-CTTGGAGAGCTGGAAACGAG-3' (forward) and 5'-GGACACAGATGGTGGACACG-3' (reverse), with an expected product size of 746 bp. The GPR8 primers were 5'-GCCACTGCCGTTCCTCTAT-3' (forward) and 5'-GATGATGGGGGTGATGATGG-3' (reverse), with an expected product size of 898 bp. A glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase cDNA fragment (509 bp) was amplified as control, using as primers 5'-ACCACCATGGAGAAGGCTGG-3' (forward) and 5'-CTCAGTGTAGCCCAGGATGC-3' (reverse). Approximately 50 ng of poly(A)+ RNA or 500 ng of total RNA was reverse transcribed with Superscript II (Invitrogen) and used for PCR. PCR was performed using the Taq polymerase under the following conditions: denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, 34 cycles at 94 °C for 1 min, 60 °C for 2 min, and 72 °C for 50 s. Aliquots (10 µl) of the PCRs were analyzed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis.
Prepropeptides ppL7 and ppL8 transcripts were detected by RT-PCR using
as primers (Eurogentec, Belgium) 5'-ACAGCTCCTACTCGGTG-3' (ppL7
forward), 5'-GCACCTTTGCAGGTTTGG-3' (ppL7 reverse),
5'-CTCCACTGCGCGCCCAAAC-3' (ppL8 forward), and 5'-GCGTCTGCCACAGCTCCTG-3'
(ppL8 reverse). The expected size of the amplified DNA bands was 189 and 377 bp for ppL7 and ppL8, respectively. PCRs were performed using
Taq DNA polymerase under the following conditions: 94 °C
for 5 min; 94 °C for 1 min, 53 °C for 1 min 30 s, 72 °C
for 30 s, 34 cycles (for ppL7) or 94 °C for 5 min;
94 °C for 1 min, 61 °C for 1 min 30, 72 °C for 30 s, 29 cycles (for ppL8). Aliquots (10 µl) of the PCRs were analyzed by 1%
agarose gel electrophoresis. Negative controls included a PCR made with
no cDNA, and reactions were performed with RNA of every tissue
sample in the absence of reverse transcription.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Identification of Potential GPR7 Ligands-- Given the recent description of peptides active on the orphan receptor GPR8 (1) and the structural relatedness between GPR7 and GPR8, these peptides were considered as potential agonists for GPR7, and other GPR7 ligands were searched for in DNA databases. The 23-amino acid sequence of the L8 peptide (Fig. 2C), the shortest GPR8 ligand described, was used as a query to screen, using tblastn and fasta software, the human genome and EST databases. Besides ppL8-encoding clones that mapped to 16q13.1, eight human genomic clones (accession numbers AC069004, AJ336655, AJ337187, AJ337377, AJ337373, AJ324434, AJ337491, and AJ337413), all corresponding to a single locus and belonging to the 17q25-qter region of the human genome, and eight overlapping human ESTs (accession numbers BM978256, AI394669, AW058203, AW167739, AW166253, BF841452, and W25219) were identified for their high similarity to the L8 sequence. The reconstruction of the coding sequences and their translation led to a predicted amino acid sequence, ppL7, encoded by these clones. The sequence derived from one of the genomic clones (AC069004) differed only by an alanine deletion and was not retrieved among the PCR products amplified subsequently. It might therefore represent a minor allele in the population or result from a sequencing artifact and was therefore not considered further. The coding sequence of the ppL7 gene is interrupted by an intron, as shown in Fig. 2A. Two of the EST sequences (AI394669 and AW058203) contained this intron, suggesting inefficient splicing or contamination of the EST databases by genomic clones. Amplifications from adult brain resulted in two fragments of 0.4 and 0.5 kb, and amplification from fetal brain resulted in a single 0.4-kb fragment. The sequence of the 0.5-kb fragment corresponded to the genomic sequence, whereas 99 nucleotides were deleted in the middle of the 0.4-kb fragment sequence (Fig. 2A). The nucleotide sequence at the borders of the deleted fragment perfectly matches the splicing donor and acceptor sites, as described by Mount (27). We thus concluded that these 99 nucleotides correspond to a putative intron and that the 0.5-kb PCR fragment originated from nonspliced RNA, whereas the 0.4-kb fragment originated from the spliced mRNA. Both fragments contained the entire coding sequence for ppL7. Since the intronic sequence is in-frame and contains no stop codons, it is possible that alternative splicing would result in a functional unspliced transcript, encoding 31 additional amino acid residues downstream of the coding sequence of L7 (Fig. 2A).
Prepro-L7 and prepro-L8 displayed 23% amino acid identity (Fig. 2B), particularly within the peptides predicted to derive from them by proteolytic processing (66% identity between L7C and L8C; 61% identity between L7 and L8) (Fig. 2C). The peptides or their precursors did not exhibit any obvious structural relationships with other known peptide families, such as opiates or somatostatin. On the basis of the ppL7 precursor gene sequence, the full coding human cDNA sequence was isolated by RT-PCR from a pool of poly(A)+ RNA extracted from different tissues (kidney, fetal liver, and adrenal gland). The isolated cDNA encoded a prepropeptide of 125 amino acids (Fig. 2A), with a predicted signal peptide of 24 amino acids (28). A mouse EST exhibiting high sequence similarity with human ppL7 was found in the databases (AC BB655095) and is believed to encode the mouse ortholog of the human precursor. The overall amino acid identity between the mouse and human sequences is 58%. The propeptide contains two dibasic motifs, suggesting that three independent peptides could result from the full processing of the precursor by prohormone convertases. By analogy with the peptides derived from the L8 precursor, we designated as L7 the peptide located between the signal peptide and the first dibasic motif, whereas L7C designates a longer peptide extending through the first dibasic motif and ending before the second (Fig. 2C). The mouse sequence displayed only the second dibasic amino acid pair (Fig. 2B), and as a consequence, only the L7C peptide can be generated from this precursor.
Pharmacology of GPR7 and GPR8 Receptors--
The ability of L7,
L7C, L8, and L8C to activate GPR7 and GPR8 was tested using an
aequorin-based functional assay. In this assay, L7C was the most potent
agonist of GPR7 (EC50 = 50 ± 11 nM,
mean ± S.E.) followed by L7, L8, and L8C (L7, EC50 = 126 ± 21 nM; L8, EC50 = 159 ± 12 nM; L8C, EC50 = 241 ± 10 nM)
(Fig. 3A). L8 was the most
potent agonist of GPR8 (EC50 = 58 ± 5 nM) followed by L8C, L7C, and L7 (L8C, EC50 = 77 ± 7 nM; L7C, EC50 = 91 ± 17 nM;
L7, EC50 = 121 ± 16 nM) (Fig.
3B). The peptides were inactive on mock-transfected cells up
to 10 µM. A C-terminally truncated form of human L7
(ppL7-(25-44), WYKPAAGHSSYSVGRAAGLL) was active on both GPR7
and GPR8, but with a lower potency than the L7 or L7C forms (data not
shown). The short peptides, predicted to derive from the precursors,
and representing the C-terminal extension of human L7C (ppL7-(51-54),
SPYA) and L8C (ppL8-(58-62), SPYLW), were inactive on both
receptors.
|
L8 and L7 peptides were iodinated, and binding experiments were performed on membranes obtained from CHO-K1 cells expressing GPR7 or GPR8. In competition binding experiments, L7C and L8C were both more potent than the shorter L7 and L8 peptides on GPR7, L7C displaying the highest affinity. The IC50 values were 1.95 ± 0.27, 0.33 ± 0.05, 1.60 ± 0.15, and 0.96 ± 0.16 nM for L7, L7C, L8, and L8C, respectively (Fig. 3C). In contrast, GPR8 displayed the highest affinity for L8, followed by L8C, L7, and L7C. The IC50 values for GPR8 were 4.01 ± 0.13, 0.98 ± 0.28, 0.298 ± 0.002, and 0.43 ± 0.15 nM for L7, L7C, L8, and L8C, respectively (Fig. 3D). Opioid compounds that have previously been described as ligands of GPR7 (20) were tested as well in competition binding assays. However, bremazocin could not compete with L7 for GPR7 binding up to a concentration of 1 µM (data not shown).
Intracellular Coupling of GPR7 and GPR8--
To determine the
natural coupling of the receptor to intracellular signaling pathways,
CHO-K1 cell lines stably expressing GPR7 or GPR8, in the absence of
exogenous transduction protein, were generated. Significant inhibition
of forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation was observed for low
concentrations of the four peptides in CHO-K1-GPR7 cells. L7C was
slightly more potent (IC50 = 0.14 ± 0.04 nM) than L7 (IC50 = 0.36 ± 0.05 nM), L8 (IC50 = 0.42 ± 0.09 nM), and L8C (IC50 = 1.99 ± 0.57 nM) (all values as mean ± S.E.) (Fig.
4A). Inhibition of cAMP
accumulation was also observed in CHO-K1-GPR8 cells. L8 was more potent
(IC50 = 0.98 ± 0.09 nM) than L8C
(IC50 = 9.8 ± 2.0 nM), L7C
(IC50 = 12.5 ± 2.3 nM), and L7
(IC50 = 20.9 ± 2.5 nM) (all values as
mean ± S.E.) (Fig. 4B). Similar results were obtained
with the CHO-WTA11 cells co-expressing G16 and GPR7 or
GPR8. The effect of L7 and L8 peptides on each receptor was strongly
inhibited by pertussis toxin (data not shown). No modification of
phosphatidylinositol turnover was observed in COS-7 cells transiently
expressing GPR7 or GPR8. However, COS-7 cells co-transfected with GPR7
or GPR8 and a Gqi5 chimeric G protein exhibited inositol
trisphosphate production in response to L7 or L8. The cells were
challenged with increasing concentrations of the agonists, and IP
accumulated as a function of the concentration of L7 for GPR7
(EC50 = 8.2 nM) and L8 for GPR8
(EC50 = 15.7 nM; data not shown).
|
Distribution of GPR7, GPR8, ppL7, and ppL8 Transcripts--
Tissue
distribution of the ligand and receptor transcripts was determined by
RT-PCR in peripheral tissues and central nervous system regions (Fig.
5 and Table I). For the ppL7 precursor
transcript, the expected size of the
amplified band was 189 bp. A band of this size was indeed obtained in
several tissues, sequenced, and found to correspond to ppL7. Specific
ppL7 transcripts were found at high levels in adult and fetal brain,
substantia nigra, spinal cord, placenta, and colorectal adenocarcinoma
(for extended distribution, see Table I). A second band of 289 bp was
also observed following ppL7 amplification. This band was sequenced and
found to correspond to an unspliced form of ppL7 transcript, similar to
that found in the ESTs AI394669 and AW058203 of the public databases. This unspliced form of ppL7 transcripts was only detected at low levels
(data not shown). Transcripts encoding the ppL8 precursors were
detected at high levels by RT-PCR in the substantia nigra, lymphoblastic leukemia, fetal kidney, colorectal adenocarcinoma, and
trachea (Table I).
|
|
Tissue distribution of the receptor transcripts was determined in
parallel. Transcripts encoding GPR7 were detected at high levels in
hippocampus, amygdala, trachea, and lung carcinoma (Table I). GPR7
transcripts were also detected at moderate levels in fetal brain,
pituitary gland, and prostate (Table I). GPR8 transcripts were detected
at high levels in caudate nucleus, hippocampus, and amygdala and at
moderate levels in the adult brain, thalamus, parietal cortex,
pituitary gland, adrenal gland, lymph nodes, and lymphoblastic leukemia
(Table I).
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
GPR7 and GPR8 are two structurally related orphan G protein-coupled receptors sharing amino acid sequence similarity with a number of neuropeptide receptors, particularly with opioid and somatostatin receptor groups. As typically observed for G protein-coupled receptor subfamilies, GPR7 and GPR8 display similarities mostly within the transmembrane and intracellular loops, whereas the N terminus and extracellular loops are somehow more divergent (Fig. 1). The overall identity between the two sequences is 61%, whereas the most closely related receptors (somatostatin receptors) share no more than 41%. This makes of GPR7 and GPR8 a putative subfamily of G protein-coupled receptors that could share the same, or structurally similar, ligands. Partial sequences encoding GPR7 and GPR8 have been cloned from several nonhuman species, demonstrating the high conservation of the primary structure (on average 84% identity between mammalian orthologs across available sequences), although the GPR8 gene is apparently absent from the genome of rodents (21).
Using the sequence of the recently identified GPR8 ligands, L8 and L8C, we have identified, in the genome and EST databases, a gene encoding a protein precursor expected to generate, following proteolytic processing, new bioactive peptides related to L8, called L7 and L7C. The precursor of L7 and L7C peptides was predicted to contain a leader sequence of 24 amino acid sequence. The human precursor could generate both an analog of L8 and of the C-terminally extended form L8C. The mouse precursor lacks one of the dibasic cleavage motives, so that only the longer L7C peptide can be generated. By analogy, it is therefore possible that the actual peptide produced in humans is also the long L7C form, although this will have to be demonstrated following the design of adequate tools, such as antibodies directed at these peptides. The tetrapeptide SPYA, located between the first and second dibasic cleavage sites in the human precursor, is not expected to be generated in mice, and we have not tested so far whether the human peptide (which is inactive on GPR7 and GPR8) might have other biological activities by itself. The similarity between prepro-L7 and prepro-L8 is essentially concentrated within the L7C and L8C peptides themselves, suggesting that the C-terminal peptide resulting from proteolytic cleavage is probably devoid of biological activity. The structural similarity is higher in the N-terminal part of the peptides, which probably represents the bioactive domain, as suggested also by the activity of a L7 peptide variant lacking the last three amino acids. Additional structure-function analyses will however be necessary in order to determine more precisely the functional domain of the peptides. L7 and L8 represent a new family of bioactive peptides unrelated to other peptide families known so far.
GPR7 and GPR8 were shown to be coupled to the inhibition of adenylate cyclase in CHO-K1 cells, through pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins. The presence of the chimeric Gqi protein appeared necessary to couple GPR7 and GPR8 to the activation of phospholipase C in COS-7 cells.
Functional expression of GPR7 in CHO-K1 has been particularly difficult to establish, as compared with GPR8 or other G protein-coupled receptors in general. The selection of recombinant clones expressing significant GPR7 levels was indeed troublesome, requiring the use of magnetic cell sorting and the testing of a large number of clones. In addition, many of the established clones turned out to contain deletions in the GPR7 coding sequence, as shown by RT-PCR and sequencing, sometimes allowing the presence of a truncated receptor at the cell surface. Binding assays finally indicated that, on average, the GPR7 expression levels in the validated clones were lower than for GPR8. Altogether, it is therefore likely that CHO-K1 cells expressing high levels of GPR7 have been counterselected during the cloning procedure, although the nature of the selective pressure is presently not known.
Distribution studies of GPR7 in the rat and mouse central nervous systems by in situ hybridization have been reported previously (3, 7, 20, 21). These studies identified moderate to high GPR7 expression in various brain regions, but the distribution pattern appeared more restricted than that of the related opioid, somatostatin, and nociceptin receptors. The presence of GPR7 transcripts in neurons of limbic, hippocampal, and hypothalamic regions suggests a role in a number of central functions, including memory, learning, olfaction, and control of the endocrine system (21). Regulation of GPR7 gene expression has also been reported in human peripheral neuropathies (29). High levels of GPR7 transcripts were indeed found in biopsies of regenerating nerves showing efficient remyelination and perivascular infiltration by inflammatory cells. The regulation of GPR7 during the nerve repair process has led to the suggestion that it might contribute to the phenotypic changes of sensory neurons that underlie neuropathic pain (29).
From the expression profile described here, it appears that the ppL7 gene is more widely expressed in the central nervous system than the ppL8 gene. Higher ppL7 signals are obtained by RT-PCR in adult and fetal brain, and ppL7 transcripts have been found in all brain regions investigated. In contrast, ppL8 transcripts were not detectable in many regions of the central nervous system, including thalamus, hypothalamus, caudate nucleus, pons, spinal cord, and dorsal root ganglia. In terms of receptors, GPR8 is more widely expressed than GPR7 in the human nervous system. Both GPR7 and GPR8 are highly expressed in hippocampus and amygdala, but additional sites are positive for GPR8. The high expression of ppL7 and ppL8 in substantia nigra and the expression of GPR8 in caudate nucleus suggest a role in locomotor control. GPR7 is poorly expressed in human hypothalamus, despite high expression reported previously in rat and mouse hypothalamus (21). The expression of ppL7 in hypothalamus and the presence of both GPR7 and GPR8 transcripts in pituitary suggest also a role of the peptides in the release of pituitary hormones. GPR7 transcripts have been described previously in the anterior lobe of human pituitary by Northern blot and in situ hybridization (20). We have also demonstrated the expression of GPR8 in the anterior lobe of human pituitary by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization (work in progress; data not shown). In this context, it was reported that injection of L8 in rats increased prolactin release (1).
In contrast to the situation in brain, ppL8 expression was more widespread than that of ppL7 in peripheral tissues. Both ligand precursors are highly expressed in testis, ovary, uterus, and placenta, suggesting a regulatory role in reproductive functions. The expression of ligands in spleen and lymph nodes and of receptors in peripheral blood leukocytes could indicate a role in the immune system. High levels of GPR7 and ppL8 transcripts were also found in trachea, suggesting the possible existence of a local loop in the respiratory system.
GPR7 displays a relative preference for L7, and GPR8 displays a relative preference for L8. However, given the activity of both peptides on the two receptors in the low nanomolar range, it is difficult to postulate, on the basis of the presently available data, the respective physiological effects of L7 and L8 on each receptor. In rodents, in which the GPR8 gene has not been identified so far, it is likely that the effects of both peptides are mediated through their activity on GPR7.
In conclusion, we have identified by bioinformatics a protein precursor
that is expected to generate a new peptide, called L7, which represents
a high affinity natural ligand for the previously orphan G
protein-coupled receptor, GPR7. GPR7 is also activated, although with a
lower efficiency, by the related peptide L8, and both peptides are high
affinity agonists for the recently characterized GPR8 receptor. The
tissue distribution of the receptors and peptide precursors in humans
suggests a broad range of potential activities in central and
peripheral functions. Additional studies, including in vivo
pharmacology and the generation of knockout models, will be necessary
for specifying the most relevant functions of this new system and their
potential applications in therapeutic areas. During the review process
of the present manuscript, two publications (31, 32) describing
partially overlapping data became available online.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
---|
We thank Géraldine André, Marie-Eve Decobecq, Marceline Bosefe, Sandrine Hospied, Céline Jeanty, Sophie Lamoral, Nadia Tazir, and Laurence Torset for technical assistance and E. Godefroid for assistance in tissue collection. We thank Dr. R. White, Prof. G. Vassart, and Dr. M. Kotani for helpful advice and discussions.
![]() |
FOOTNOTES |
---|
* This work was supported by the Actions de Recherche Concertées of the Communauté Française de Belgique; the Belgian Program on Interuniversity Poles of Attraction initiated by the Belgian State, Prime Minister's Office, Science Policy Programming; the Cell Factory Programs of the European Community (Grant QLK3-2000-00237); the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique Médicale of Belgium; and the Fondation Médicale Reine Elisabeth.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ These three authors contributed equally to this work.
** To whom correspondence should be addressed: Institute of Interdisciplinary Research, Campus Erasme, Bldg. C, 5th floor, 808 Route de Lennik, 1070 Brussels, Belgium. Tel.: 32-2-555-41-71; Fax: 32-2-555-46-55; E-mail: mparment@ulb.ac.be.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 24, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M206396200
![]() |
ABBREVIATIONS |
---|
The abbreviations used are:
GPCR, G
protein-coupled receptor;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium;
EST, expressed sequence tag;
IP, inositol phosphate;
GTPS, guanosine
5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate;
IBMX, isobutylmethylxanthine;
HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography;
RT, reverse transcription;
ppL7, prepro-L7;
ppL8, prepro-L8;
CHO, Chinese hamster ovary.
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
1. | Mori, M., Shimomura, Y., Harada, M., Kurihara, M., Kitada, C., Asami, T., Matsumoto, Y., Adachi, Y., Watanabe, T., Sugo, T., and Abe, M. (December, 27, 2001) World Patent Cooperation Treaty, Patent Application WO 01/98494A1 |
2. | Bockaert, J., and Pin, J. P. (1999) EMBO J. 19, 1723-1729[CrossRef] |
3. | Civelli, O., Nothacker, H. P., Saito, Y., Wang, Z., Lin, S. H., and Reinscheid, R. K. (2001) Trends Neurosci. 24, 230-237[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
4. | Dixon, R. A. F., Kobilka, B. K., Strader, D. J., Benovic, J. L., Dohlman, H. G., Frielle, T., Bolanowski, M. A., Bennett, C. D., Rands, E., and Diehl, R. E. (1986) Nature 321, 75-79[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
5. | Kobilka, B. K., Frielle, T., Collins, S., Yang-Feng, T., Kobilka, T. S., Francke, U., Lefkowitz, R. J., and Caron, M. G. (1987) Nature 329, 75-79[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
6. | Fargin, A., Raymond, J. R., Lohse, M. J., Kobilka, B. K., Caron, M. G., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1988) Nature 335, 358-360[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
7. | Meunier, J. C., Mollereau, C., Toll, L., Suaudeau, C., Moisand, C., Alvinerie, P., Butour, J. L., Guillemot, J. C., Ferrara, P., and Monsarrat, B. (1995) Nature 377, 532-535[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
8. | Reinsheid, R. K., Nothaker, H. P., Bourson, A., Henningsen, R. A., Bunzow, J. R., Grandy, D. K., Langen, H., Monsma, F. J., and Civelli, O. (1995) Science 270, 792-794[Abstract] |
9. | Sakurai, T., Amemiya, A., Ishii, M., Matsuzaki, I., Chemelli, R. M., Tanaka, H., Williams, S. C., Richardson, J. A., Kozlowski, G. P., Wilson, S., Arch, J. R., Buckingham, R. E., Haynes, A. C., Carr, S. A., Annan, R. S., McNulty, D. E., Liu, W. S., Terrett, J. A., Elshourbagy, N. A., Bergsma, D. J., and Yanagisawa, M. (1998) Cell 92, 573-585[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
10. | Hinuma, S., Habata, Y., Fujii, R., Kawamata, Y., Hosoya, M., Fukusumi, S., Kitada, C., Masuo, Y., Asano, T., Matsumoto, H., Sekiguchi, M., Kurokawa, T., Nishimura, O., Onda, H., and Fujino, M. (1998) Nature 393, 272-276[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
11. | Chambers, J., Ames, R. S., Bergsma, D., Muir, A., Fitzgerald, L. R., Hervieu, G., Dytko, G. M., Foley, J. J., Martin, J., Liu, W. S., Park, J., Ellis, C., Ganguly, S., Konchar, S., Cluderay, J., Leslie, R., Wilson, S., and Sarau, H. M. (1999) Nature 400, 261-265[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
12. | Saito, Y., Nothacker, H. P., Wang, Z., Lin, S. H., Leslie, F., and Civelli, O. (1999) Nature 400, 265-269[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
13. | Tatemoto, K., Hosoya, M., Habata, Y., Fujii, R., Kakegawa, T., Zou, M. X., Kawamata, Y., Fukusumi, S., Hinuma, S., Kitada, C., Kurokawa, T., Onda, H., and Fujino, M. (1998) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 251, 471-476[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
14. |
Hsu, S. Y.,
Nakabayashi, K.,
Nishi, S.,
Kumagai, J.,
Kudo, M.,
Sherwood, O. D.,
and Hsueh, A. J.
(2002)
Science
295,
671-674 |
15. | Kojima, M., Hosoda, H., Date, Y., Nakazato, M., Matsuo, H., and Kangawa, K. (1999) Nature 402, 656-660[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
16. |
Kotani, M.,
Detheux, M.,
Vandenbogaerde, A.,
Communi, D.,
Vanderwinden, J. M., Le,
Poul, E.,
Brézillon, S.,
Tyldesley, R.,
Suarez-huerta, N.,
Vandeput, F.,
Blanpain, C.,
Schiffmann, S. N.,
Vassart, G.,
and Parmentier, M.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
34631-34636 |
17. | Ohtaki, T., Shintani, Y., Honda, S., Matsumoto, H., Hori, A., Kanehashi, K., Terao, Y., Kumano, S., Takatsu, Y., Masuda, Y., Ishibashi, Y., Watanabe, T., Asada, M., Yamada, T., Suenaga, M., Kitada, C., Usuki, S., Kurokawa, T., Onda, H., Nishimura, O., and Fujino, M. (2001) Nature 411, 613-617[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
18. | Lin, D. C., Bullock, C. M., Ehlert, F. J., Chen, J. L., Tian, H., and Zhou, Q. Y. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 19279-19280 |
19. | Hinuma, S., Shintani, Y., Fukusumi, S., Lijima, N., Matsumoto, Y., Hosoya, M., Fuji, R., Watanabe, T., Kikuchi, K., Terao, Y., Yamamoto, T., Kawamata, Y., Habata, Y., Asada, M., Kitada, C., Kurokawa, T., Onda, H., Nishimura, O., Tanaka, M., Ibata, Y., and Fujino, M. (2000) Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 703-708[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
20. | O'Dowd, B. F., Scheideler, M. A., Nguyen, T., Cheng, R., Rasmussen, J. S., Marchese, A., Zastawny, R., Heng, H. H., Tsui, L. C., Shi, X., Asa, S., Puy, L., and George, S. R. (1995) Genomics 28, 84-91[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
21. | Lee, D. K., Nguyen, T., Porter, C. A., Cheng, R., George, S. R., and O'Dowd, B. F. (1999) Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 71, 96-103[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
22. |
Blanpain, C.,
Doranz, B. J.,
Vakili, J.,
Ruker, J.,
Govaerts, C.,
Baik, S. S. W.,
Lorthioir, O.,
Migeotte, I.,
Libert, F.,
Baleux, F.,
Vassart, G.,
Doms, R. W.,
and Parmentier, M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
34719-34727 |
23. | Thompson, J. D., Gibson, T. J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F., and Higgins, D. G. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 4876-4882[CrossRef] |
24. | Conklin, B. R., Farfel, Z., Lustig, K. D., Julius, D., and Bourne, H. R. (1993) Nature 363, 274-276[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
25. |
Costagliola, S.,
Rodien, P.,
Many, M. C.,
Ludgate, M.,
and Vassart, G.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
160,
1458-1465 |
26. | Joly, C., Gomeza, J., Brabet, I., Curry, K., Bockaert, J., and Pin, J. P. (1995) J. Neurosci. 15, 3970-3981[Abstract] |
27. | Mount, S. M. (1982) Nucleic Acids Res. 10, 459-472[Abstract] |
28. | Nakai, K., and Horton, P. (1999) Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, 34-35[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
29. | Zaratin, P. F., Quattrini, A., Previtali, S., Hervieu, G., and Scheideler, M. A. (2002) in 13th Noordwijkerhout-Camerino Symposium, Noordwijkerhout, May 2002 (van der Goot, H., ed), Abstr. 9.4.8, Trends in Drug Research III, Amsterdam |
30. |
Luecke, H.,
Schobert, B.,
Lanyi, J. K.,
Spudich, E. N.,
and Spudich, J. L.
(2001)
Science
293,
1499-1503 |
31. |
Shimomura, Y.,
Harada, M.,
Goto, M.,
Sugo, T.,
Matsumoto, Y.,
Abe, M.,
Watanabe, T.,
Asami, Y.,
Kitada, C.,
Mori, M.,
Onda, H.,
and Fujino, M.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
35826-35832 |
32. |
Fujii, R.,
Yashida, H.,
Fukusumi, S.,
Habata, Y.,
Hosoya, M.,
Kawamata, Y.,
Yano, T.,
Hinuma, S.,
Kitada, C.,
Asami, T.,
Mori, M.,
Fujisawa, Y.,
and Fujino, M.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
34010-34016 |