Identification and Molecular Characterization of a Chitinase from the Hard Tick Haemaphysalis longicornis*

Myungjo YouDagger §, Xuenan Xuan§, Naotoshi Tsuji||, Tsugihiko Kamio, DeMar Taylor**, Naoyoshi Suzuki§, and Kozo Fujisaki§DaggerDagger

From the Dagger  Department of Basic Veterinary Science, the United Graduate School of Veterinary Sciences, Gifu University, Yanagito, Gifu 501-1193, Japan, § National Research Center for Protozoan Diseases, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inada-cho, Obihiro, Hokkaido 080-8555, Japan,  National Institute of Animal Health, 3-1-5 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0856, Japan, and ** Institute of Agriculture and Forestry, Tsukuba University, Tennohdai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0006, Japan

Received for publication, July 9, 2002, and in revised form, December 3, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

A cDNA encoding tick chitinase was cloned from a cDNA library of mRNA from Haemaphysalis longicornis eggs and designated as CHT1 cDNA. The CHT1 cDNA contains an open reading frame of 2790 bp that codes for 930 amino acid residues with a coding capacity of 104 kDa. The deduced amino acid sequence shows a 31% amino acid homology to Aedes aegypti chitinase and a multidomain structure containing one chitin binding peritrophin A domain and two glycosyl hydrolase family 18 chitin binding domains. The endogenous chitinase of H. longicornis was identified by a two-dimensional immunoblot analysis with mouse anti-rCHT1 serum and shown to have a molecular mass of 108 kDa with a pI of 5.0. A recombinant baculovirus AcMNPV·CHT1-expressed rCHT1 is glycosylated and able to degrade chitin. Chitin degradation was ablated by allosamidin in a dose-dependent manner. The optimal temperature and pH for activity of the purified chitinase were 45 °C and pH 5-7. The CHT1 cDNA has an ELR motif for chemokine-mediated angiogenesis and appears to be a chitinase of the chemokine family. Localization analysis using mouse anti-rCHT1 serum revealed that native chitinase is highly expressed in the epidermis and midgut of the tick. AcMNPV·CHT1 topically applied to H. longicornis ticks exhibited replication. This is the first report of insect baculovirus infection of ticks. The importance of AcMNPV·CHT1 as a novel bio-acaricide for tick control is discussed.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Chitin, the beta -1,4-linked homopolymer of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, is an insoluble structural polysaccharide that is important as a supporting element in extracellular structures. It is seen in the exoskeleton of arthropods where the chitin microfibrils complex with proteins to form the chitinous structures of the cuticle and the peritrophic membrane (PM)1 lining the gut (1, 2). The PM extracellularly surrounds the food bolus in the guts of most arthropods (3, 4). It has been shown to be important in preventing damage or clogging of microvilli by the luminal contents (5, 6) and compartmentalization of digestive events by acting as a permeability barrier for digestive enzymes (7) and to have a novel role for protecting Leishmania from the hydrolytic activities of the sand fly midgut (8). However, arthropods must be able to hydrolyze the chitin to allow degradation of the cuticle and development during the immature stages. Events during the molting cycle have been investigated biochemically and morphologically (9), and chitinase has been shown to be an essential component in the hydrolysis of chitin. Ticks are hemimetabolous in nature, implying they also require chitinolytic enzymes to remove old cuticle and allow synthesis of new cuticle for continued growth and development. Chitinase is induced by ecdysteroids to degrade the older chitin at the time of molting (10, 11). The chitinase inhibitor, allosamidin, isolated from culture broth of Streptomyces sp. (12), has been used as an important tool to elucidate several essential features of insect chitinases (13).

Ticks are second only to mosquitoes as vectors of disease-causing agents in humans and are the most important arthropod transmitting pathogens to domestic and wild animals, e.g. Babesia and Theileria protozoa, Borrelia bacteria, and hemorrhagic and encephalomyelitis virus (14, 15). The hard tick, Haemaphysalis longicornis, is distributed mainly in East Asia and Australia, where it transmits these pathogens (16, 17). A variety of methods have been employed to suppress tick vector populations, including the application of biological control agents and the heavy reliance on chemical acaricides. However, the development of resistance to acaricides (18-20) and the increase in legislation to combat detrimental effects of residues of acaricides in the environment (21) emphasize the need to develop alternatives for tick vector control. Recently, we have shown that troponin I (22) and peroxiredoxin (23) from H. longicornis may be candidates for control of ticks. Molting-associated molecules responsible for protecting from invasion of pathogens, control of the PM, and other necessary functions during blood feeding and molting in ticks may be candidates for tick control. Chitinase is a selective insect control protein and is safe as it is readily degradable in the environment (24).

In the present study, we report the cDNA cloning, identification, characterization, and expression of chitinase from the hard tick, H. longicornis. In addition, we discuss the possible application of tick chitinase in the control of tick vectors.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Tick-- The parthenogenetic Okayama strain of the hard tick H. longicornis (16) has been maintained by feeding on rabbits and mice in our laboratory since 1997.

DNA Probe for Screening of Chitinase cDNA-- Based on the conserved regions of known chitinases of Manduca sexta (25), Bombyx mori (26), and Drosophila melanogaster (2), two degenerate primers were designed for first PCR: sense primer, 5'-TGGKCVRTSTAYCGDC-3', and antisense primer, 5'-CCARTCRAKRTCNADNCCVT-3'. The following two degenerate primers were designed for nested PCR: sense primer, 5'-TGYACBSAYHTVATBTAYKSSTTY-3', and antisense primer, 5'-CCARTCVADRTCBADNCCRTCRAA-3'. Total RNA from eggs of H. longicornis was isolated using the thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction method (27). Reverse transcription-PCR was performed by standard techniques (28). The PCR products were subjected to 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis, and the band of predictive size was purified and cloned into pBluescript SK(+) vector by standard techniques (28).

Plaque Screening of a cDNA Expression Library-- Construction of a cDNA expression library was performed as described previously (22). The cDNA expression library was screened with an alkaline phosphatase-labeled DNA fragment amplified by PCR with degenerate primers. Plating phages and plaque lifting were performed according to the manufacture's instructions (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Labeling probes, prehybridization, and hybridization were performed according to Alkphos Direct manual (Amersham Biosciences). Positive plaques were rescreened until 100% plaque purification was achieved. The cloned insert in the plaque-purified lambda  phage was subcloned into pBluescript SK(+) (Stratagene) by using the in vivo excision capabilities of lambda  ZAP II.

cDNA Sequencing-- Restriction enzyme-generated fragments for sequencing were subcloned into pBluescript SK(+) vectors. An insert cDNA designated CHT1 cDNA was sequenced by the dideoxy chain-termination method using M13 reverse and universal primers (PerkinElmer Life Sciences). Sequence analysis was performed with the computer program MacVector (Oxford Molecular, Madison, WI).

Expression of the CHT1 cDNA in Escherichia coli-- A 2790-bp PCR fragment from H. longicornis chitinase containing an open reading frame was inserted into the EcoRI site of pGEX-4T-3 to generate the recombinant plasmid pGEX-4T-CHT1. Restriction enzyme analysis was performed to identify the construct containing the insert in the correct orientation. Expression of the CHT1 cDNA in E. coli was performed as described previously (22). The recombinant CHT1 (rCHT1) was expressed as glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion protein and designated GST-CHT1 protein.

Production of anti-rCHT1 Sera-- Female mice (BALB/c, 8 weeks old) were immunized intraperitoneally three times at 2-week intervals with 100 µg of the recombinant fusion protein in Freund's incomplete adjuvant. Sera were collected from immunized mice 10 days after the last immunization.

Two-dimensional Immunoblot-- Tick extracts were treated with an equal volume of urea mixture consisting of 9 M urea, 4% Nonidet P-40, 0.8% ampholine (pH 3.5-8; Amersham Biosciences), and 2% 2-mercaptoethanol and then subjected to two-dimensional PAGE. Non-equilibrium pH gradient electrophoresis was performed (29) in the first dimension using a rectangular gel electrophoresis apparatus (AE-6050 A; ATTO, Tokyo, Japan). After electrophoresis at 400 V for 2 h, the gels were incubated in the equilibration buffer for 10 min on a shaker. Electrophoresis in the second dimension was performed on 8% SDS-PAGE gels under reducing conditions. The proteins were either stained using a silver staining kit (Dai-ichi Pure Chemical, Tokyo, Japan) or transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Immunoblot analysis was carried out as previously described (30). Anti-mouse rCHT1 serum was used at a dilution of 1:500. The proteins bound to the secondary antibody were visualized with nitro blue tetrazolium/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate.

Northern Blot Analysis-- Formaldehyde-denatured RNA (10 µg) extracted from eggs of H. longicornis incubated at 25 °C for 10 days was fractionated on 1.2% formaldehyde-agarose gel, transferred to a nylon membrane (Hybond-N, Amersham Biosciences), and hybridized with an alkaline phosphatase-labeled probe derived from the CHT1 cDNA. The presence of probe was detected using CDP-Star (Amersham Biosciences) by chemiluminescent technique. The hybridization technique was performed as described in the Alkphos Direct manual (Amersham Biosciences).

Cells and Viruses-- Spodographa frugiperda (Sf9) cells were propagated at 27 °C in TC-100 and SF-900 II serum-free insect cell culture medium obtained from Invitrogen. Autographa californica multiple nuclear polyhidrosis virus (AcMNPV) and recombinant viruses were grown in Sf9 cells.

Construction of Recombinant Baculovirus Expressing the H. longicornis CHT1 cDNA-- The 2790-bp PCR fragment from H. longicornis CHT1 cDNA containing the open reading frame was inserted into the EcoRI site of an AcMNPV transfer vector, pBlueBac4.5/V5-His (Invitrogen) to produce the recombinant transfer plasmid pBlueBac4.5/V5-His-CHT1, and the recombinant protein was expressed by recombinant baculovirus as a protein fused with a COOH-terminal peptide (3 kDa) containing the V5 epitope and a His6 tag. Restriction enzyme analysis was performed to identify the construct containing the insert in the correct orientation. Sf9 cells were cotransfected with pBlueBac4.5/V5-His-CHT1 and linear AcMNPV DNA, Bac-N-Blue DNA (Invitrogen), by using Cellfectin reagent (Invitrogen). After 4 days of incubation at 27 °C, the culture supernatant containing recombinant virus was harvested and subjected to plaque purification. The expression of rCHT1 in the plaques was confirmed by indirect immunofluorescent antibody test with anti-rCHT1 serum. Positive plaques were selected, and after three cycles of purification a recombinant virus, AcMNPV·CHT1 was obtained.

Purification of H. longicornis Chitinase-- Thirty ml of Sf9 cells culture supernatant infected with the recombinant virus (AcMNPV·CHT1) or as a control infected with the wild type virus (AcMNPV·wt) were dialyzed against binding buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate, 500 mM NaCl, 5 mM imidazole (pH 7.4)) and concentrated by ultrafiltration (Concentrator 10/20, exclusion size: 30 kDa). Two ml of 50% nickel nitrilotriacetic acid slurry (Invitrogen) was centrifuged (5 min at 500 × g) and washed twice with binding buffer. After incubation for 1 h at 4 °C under continuous shaking, the slurry was centrifuged, and the supernatant was discarded. The pellet was washed at 4 °C with 20 ml of washing buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate, 500 mM NaCl (pH 6.0)) containing 50 mM imidazole. Elution was performed with 5 ml of elution buffer (pH 6.0) containing 350 mM imidazole. The final eluent containing the isolated protein was dialyzed against 20 mM sodium phosphate (pH 6.0) at 4 °C and stored at -80 °C until further analysis.

In Vitro Chitinase Activity Assay-- 4-Methylumbelliferyl-N, N',N ''-triacetyl-beta -chitotrioside (Sigma) (4MU-(GlcNAc)3) was used for chitinase activity assay at a concentration of 0.8 mM in distilled water. Kinetic studies of chitinase were performed in a fluorescence spectrophotometer (excitation 350 nm, emission 450 nm) (Japan spectrophotometer FP-770, Tokyo, Japan) by continuously recording changes in fluorescence. Inhibition of chitinase activity was studied by using allosamidin at a final concentration of 0.01 and 0.05 µM in the reaction mixture. Allosamidin was obtained from S. Sakuda (12). Reactions were started by the addition of enzyme (1 µg). The enzymatic activity of the rCHT1 was quantified using 4MU-(GlcNAc)3 (31). The enzyme solutions (0.16 µg) were incubated with substrate (4MU-(GlcNAc)3) in a wide range buffer (pH 2.0-12.0) (32) at 37 °C for 15 min (final concentration 3.8 µM). Reactions were terminated by the addition of 1.2 ml of 1 M glycine buffer. In the chitinase activity assay, the enzyme solutions (0.16 µg) were incubated with substrate (4MU-(GlcNAc)3) in 20 mM sodium phosphate (pH 6.0) at 4, 15, 27, 37, 45, 50, 60, and 70 °C for 15 min (final concentration 3.8 µM). Reactions were terminated by addition of 1.2 ml of 1 M glycine buffer.

Glycosylation Studies-- Glycosylation studies with tunicamycin were performed as described previously (24). Briefly, tunicamycin (Sigma) was added at a concentration of 10 µg/ml to the Sf9 cells 15 h after infection with AcMNPV·CHT1. Purified rCHT1 (20 µg) was treated with N-glycosidase F under denaturing conditions as recommended by the manufacturer (N-glycosidase F deglycosylation kit, Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and analyzed by immunoblotting with mouse anti-rCHT1 serum.

Immunohistochemistry-- Immunohistochemistry was performed with peroxidase-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody as described previously (22). Molting nymphs 10 days after engorgement, unfed females, and tick tissues were handled as described previously (22).

Infection with AcMNPV·CHT1 and Detection of rCHT1 in H. longicornis Infected with AcMNPV·CHT1-- AcMNPV·CHT1 culture medium (ACM) was applied topically to the dorsal surface of unfed H. longicornis larvae and adults. Ticks were collected 10 days after application. The salivary glands of adult ticks were dissected under a microscope (16). The dissected ticks were stored at -80 °C until use. Salivary glands were embedded in embedding medium (Tissue-Tek®, Sakura, Tokyo, Japan) and fixed using standard methods. Thin transverse sections of the ticks ~7 µm thick were then prepared using a microtome. The slides were blocked for 1 h with 3% skim milk (Wako, Tokyo, Japan) in PBS and then incubated for 4 h at room temperature with mouse anti-rCHT1 serum diluted to 1:200 with PBS. The slides were rinsed thoroughly with PBS and reacted 1 h with red fluorescence-labeled mouse IgG secondary antibody (Alexa Flouor 594® goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L), Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). The slides were then rinsed thoroughly with PBS, covered with glass slips, and observed under a fluorescence microscope (ECLIPSE E600, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Larvae ticks topically treated with ACM were washed 3 times with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20, homogenized, and used for immunoblots as described previously (22). The membranes were incubated for 1 h with anti-V5-AP antibody (Invitrogen) at a dilution of 1:500.

Nucleotide Sequence Accession Number-- The nucleotide sequence data reported in this paper appears in the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBankTM nucleotide sequence data base with the accession number AB074977.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

DNA Probe, cDNA Library Screening, and DNA Sequence Analysis-- Four degenerate primers based on a conserved region in the cDNAs of several chitinases were used to amplify the H. longicornis chitinase cDNA fragment. A PCR fragment of 291 bp was inserted into pBluescript SK(+) vector and sequenced. The nucleotide sequence of the PCR fragment from H. longicornis had a putative conserved chitinase domain. The PCR fragment was used as a probe for screening the entire chitinase cDNA from the cDNA library of H. longicornis eggs. Five positive clones were isolated from the H. longicornis egg cDNA library, and no sequence heterogeneity was found among these clones. The clones appeared to be about 2.9, 4.1, 4.3, 5.5, and 6.5 kilobase pairs in size. One of the 5 cDNA clones of 6.5 kilobase pairs was designated CHT1. DNA sequencing revealed that the CHT1 cDNA with 6439 bp had a start codon at 571-573 bases and a stop codon at 3358-3360 bases (Fig. 1). CHT1 cDNA has an open reading frame extending from position 571 to position 3360 and codes 930 amino acid residues with a predicted molecular mass of about 104 kDa (Fig. 1). This deduced protein has six potential N-glycosylation sites (Fig. 1). The mRNA corresponding to the cloned cDNA was confirmed by Northern blotting analysis of total RNA extracted from eggs of H. longicornis ticks to be about 7.5 kilobases in size (Fig. 2).


View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Nucleotide sequence and deduced amino acid sequence of H. longicornis CHT1 cDNA. The initial codon ATG and termination codon TAG are indicated in bold, and the putative signal peptide of the deduced amino acid sequence is underlined.


View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Northern blot of mRNA of the CHT1 cDNA. Total RNA isolated from adult female H. longicornis ticks was resolved on an 1% agarose gel containing formaldehyde and transferred to a nylon membrane (Hybond N+; Amersham Biosciences).

Expression of CHT1 in E. coli and Sf9 Cells-- As shown in Fig. 3, the molecular mass of GST-CHT1 fusion protein was estimated as 130 kDa containing a GST protein of 26 kDa. The mouse anti-rCHT1 serum reacted with a 116-kDa protein from recombinant baculovirus-infected Sf9 cell culture medium and 107- and 116-kDa proteins from the recombinant baculovirus-infected Sf9 cell extracts (see Fig. 5A, lanes 2 and 4).


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   SDS-PAGE analysis of recombinant CHT1 expressed in E. coli. The proteins expressed by pGEX-4T-3/CHT1 (lane 2) or pGEX-4T-3 vector without insert (lane 3) were detected by CBB staining. Lane 1 is molecular mass marker.

Detection of Endogenous CHT1-- We performed two-dimensional immunoblot analysis to identify endogenous CHT1 in ticks. Mouse anti-rCHT1 serum strongly reacted with a protein having a molecular mass of 108 kDa with a pI of 5.0 (Fig. 4A), confirming that it corresponded to the predicted size of the putative mature protein (104 kDa) calculated from the CHT1 amino acid sequence except for a signal peptide. In addition, an endogenous CHT1 was identified on silver-stained two-dimensional gels on which more than 200 visible protein spots appeared (Fig. 4B). To determine the internal amino acid residues, protein spots of interest were excised from tick extracts using the two-dimensional gels and processed as described previously (33). The spots were pooled from 20 gels, washed with a solution of 2% citrate, and subjected to lysyl endopeptidase digestion at 35 °C for overnight (34). After in-gel digestion of the protein, peptides were collected by reverse phase high pressure liquid chromatography, and several peptides was analyzed for internal amino acid sequence in Procise 494 cLC protein sequencing system (Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA) (35, 36). The resultant amino acid sequences of four major reverse phase high pressure liquid chromatography purified peaks were identical to those of the deduced amino acid sequences encoded by CHT1 cDNA.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Identification of H. longicornis endogenous CHT1. Fifty micrograms of tick-extract protein was separated by two-dimensional pH gradient gel electrophoresis, and the proteins were then either transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (A) or stained with a two-dimensional silver stain kit (B). The fact that endogenous CHT1 was bound to the anti-rCHT1 serum was found by alignment between the stained gel and immunoblot membrane. The arrow shows endogenous CHT1, corresponding to the immunoreactive spot at panel A. IEF, isoelectric focusing.

The H. longicornis Chitinase Secreted into the Medium of Sf9 Cells Culture Is Glycosylated-- Expression of chitinase in AcMNPV·CHT1-infected Sf9 cells in the presence or absence of tunicamycin, an inhibitor of protein N-linked glycosylation, is shown in Fig. 5A. In the absence of tunicamycin, immunoreactive chitinase was released into the medium as a 116-kDa protein (Fig. 5A, lane 4). However, tunicamycin inhibited the secretion of this protein into the medium (Fig. 5A, lane 3). In extracts of cells not treated with tunicamycin, the anti-rCHT1 serum reacted with major proteins of ~107 and 116 kDa. Cells treated with tunicamycin exhibited an immunoreactive protein with an apparent molecular mass of about 107 kDa (Fig. 5A, lane 1). N-Glycosidase-treated rCHT1 protein exhibited a shift to a lower apparent molecular mass of about 107 kDa (Fig. 5B, lane 2), indicating the existence of N-linked glycan chains.


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Immunoblot detection of glycosylation in H. longicornis rCHT1. A: lane 1, lysate from cells with tunicamycin treatment; lane 2, lysate from cells without tunicamycin treatment; lane 3, medium from cells with tunicamycin treatment; lane 4, medium from cells without tunicamycin treatment in Sf9 cells. B: lane 1, lysate from cells with tunicamycin treatment; lane +, rCHT1 treated with N-glycosidase F (PNGase F; lane -, rCHT1 untreated with N-glycosidase F (control).

Purification of Recombinant H. longicornis CHT1 and in Vitro Chitinase Activity Assay of Purified rCHT1-- The His-tagged H. longicornis rCHT1 was separated from the endogenous viral chitinases using affinity chromatography. In vitro chitinase activity assay using the purified rCHT1 showed a strong hydrolysis of 4MU-(GlcNAc)3 substrate (Fig. 6). In vitro inhibition assay of chitinase activity using 0.05 µM (final concentration) allosamidin with purified rCHT1 showed a strong inhibition of the chitinase activity (Fig. 6). The specific activity (fluorescence unit) of His6-tagged H. longicornis rCHT1 against 4MU-(GlcNAc)3 was optimal at pH 5-7 but was inactive under acidic (pH < 3) or alkaline (pH > 10) conditions (Fig. 7A). The enzymatic activities increased gradually as the temperature was raised from 0 to 45-50 °C (Fig. 7B). The maximum activity was exhibited at 45 °C (Fig. 7B). The enzymatic activities started to decrease dramatically when the temperature was above 50 °C (Fig. 7B). The heat stability of the enzyme was tested after preincubation in 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) at 4, 15, 27, 37, 45, 50, 60, and 70 °C for 60 min. The results are shown in Fig. 7C. The rCHT1 protein was stable up to 45 °C and completely inactivated at 60 °C and higher temperatures.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Inhibition by allosamidin of purified rCHT1 activity expressed by AcMNPV-CHT1. diamond , no addition of allosamidin; , with 0.01 µM allosamidin; triangle , with 0.05 µM allosamidin.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Effect of pH (A) and temperature (B) on H. longicornis rCHT1 activity and enzyme stability (C) after preincubation at different temperature values. Enzyme activity was assayed using 4MU-(GlcNAc)3 as the substrate as described under "Experimental Procedures." Data are presented as fluorescence units. Mean ± S.D. (n = 3).

Localization of Native CHT1-- The location of native CHT1 in molting nymphal ticks was determined by immunohistochemistry using mouse anti-rCHT1 serum. The immunohistochemistry analysis showed chitinase of H. longicornis in epidermis and midgut of molting nymphs after engorgement (Fig. 8A) and non-engorged females (Fig. 8B). Reaction was strongly detected between old and new cuticle in molting nymphs (Fig. 8A). No reaction was detectable using preimmune mouse serum (Fig. 8, panels a'-d') in molting nymphs after engorgement and non-engorged females.


View larger version (144K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Immunohistochemical localization of CHT1 in engorged nymphs (A) and non-engorged females (B) of H. longicornis with mouse anti-rCHT1 serum. Ticks were fixed in paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin as described under "Experimental Procedures." Flat sections of whole molting nymphs 10 days after engorgement (a, a') and unfed females (b, b') were exposed to either mouse anti-rCHT1 serum (panels a-d) or preimmune mouse serum (panels a'-d'). Panels c-c' and d-d', more highly magnified sections of the epidermis and midgut of whole molting nymphs 10 days after engorgement and unfed females, respectively. mg, midgut; ed, epidermis; nc, new cuticle; oc, old cuticle; cu, cuticle.

Detection of rCHT1 in H. longicornis Infected with AcMNPV·CHT1-- The detection of rCHT1 expressed in H. longicornis infected with AcMNPV·CHT1 was performed with mouse anti-rCHT1 serum. H. longicornis adult females treated topically with ACM were dissected. A flat section of salivary gland was reacted with mouse anti-rCHT1 serum by immunofluorescence assay. Red fluorescence was present on the flat section treated with ACM (Fig. 9A). Existence of rCHT1 in infected H. longicornis larvae was also confirmed by immunoblot analysis with anti-V5-AP antibody (Fig. 9B). H. longicornis larvae lysate treated with ACM reacted with the 107-kDa band.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Detection of rCHT1. A, detection of rCHT1 expressed in adult H. longicornis salivary glands with mouse anti-rCHT1 serum by immunofluorescence assay. AcMNPV·CHT1 was dropped as described under "Experimental Procedures." The picture on the left was detected with mouse anti-rCHT1 fusion protein serum. The picture on the right was detected with mouse anti-GST serum. B, immunoblot analysis with mouse anti-V5-AP antibody. Lane 1 is larval H. longicornis lysate treated with ACM as described under "Experimental Procedures." Lane 2 is normal larval H. longicornis lysate.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Chitinases are extremely important for the hydrolytic cleavage of the beta -glycosidic linkages between GlcNAc residues of chitin to allow molting and growth in the arthropods. In general this hydrolysis can occur in one of two ways, either with retention of anomeric configuration in the product or with inversion (37). Several arthropod chitinases have been identified (25, 26, 38), but this is the first report for identification of chitinase in the arachnids, including ticks.

The complete sequence of a chitinase cDNA, CHT1, was obtained from a cDNA library of H. longicornis eggs. The open reading frame codes a protein with a predicted molecular mass of 104 kDa. The NH2-terminal sequences of the encoded protein contain numerous hydrophobic residues, characteristic of a leader peptide (Fig. 1). The putative cleavage site of the signal peptide was between residues 22 and 23 as determined by signalP prediction (39). Expression of the CHT1 cDNA in S. frugiperda cells infected with a recombinant baculovirus under the control of a polyhedrin promoter produced and secreted an enzymatically active protein with a molecular mass of 116 kDa. These results indicate the presence of a functional signal peptide.

H. longicornis CHT1 possesses potential N-glycosylation sites at the amino acid residues 115-118 (NPSL), 257-260 (NETT), 479-482 (NWSA), 729-732 (NLTD), 745-748 (NYTG) and 909-912 (NESV). Studies with tunicamycin indicated the H. longicornis rCHT1 is glycosylated (Fig. 5A). The open reading frame of the CHT1 cDNA in the recombinant virus directs the synthesis of a 116-kDa protein larger than the predicted molecular mass of 104 kDa, implying that the H. longicornis rCHT1 undergoes posttranslational modification. Consistent with this are the observations that the mouse anti-rCHT1 serum in the presence of tunicamycin did not react with major constituent protein bands of 116 kDa in the media or the cells. Instead, mouse anti-rCHT1 serum detected a 107-kDa protein accumulating in the cells. Use of the enzyme N-glycosidase F is the most effective method of removing virtually all N-linked oligosaccharides from glycoproteins (40). Fig. 5B of N-glycosidase-treated CHT1 protein provides evidence that the CHT1 protein from the tunicamycin-treated cells of Fig. 5A is deglycosylated. These results verify that H. longicornis rCHT1 with N-glycosylation sites is glycosylated.

H. longicornis CHT1 possesses a chitin binding peritrophin A domain at amino acid residues 868-922 and 2 glycosyl hydrolase family 18 chitin binding domains at amino acid residues 44-389 and 471-817. These domains strongly suggest H. longicornis CHT1 plays an important role as a chitin hydrolase in the life cycle of ticks.

The deduced amino acid sequence showed low homology to other reported chitinase sequences, such as Aedes aegypti (GenBankTM accession number T14075; 31% amino acid homology) by BLASTN (prediction of protein localization site) and MacVector Ver. 6.5 programs (sequence analysis software). Comparison of conserved regions in the amino acid sequences of chitinases revealed H. longicornis CHT1 has two pairs of conserved domains similar to those of A. aegypti chitinase (Fig. 10). The low homology in chitinase sequences indicates a strong difference between species. Only the sequence of the actual catalytic center, region II (Fig. 10), which includes the amino acids Asp-164 and Asp-592 and Glu-168 and Glu-596 in H. longicornis CHT1, are highly conserved in all family 18 chitinases characterized so far. This catalytic center is indispensable for enzyme activity (41) and implies that H. longicornis CHT1 is a member of the family 18 chitinases.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Comparison of conserved regions in amino acid sequences of H. longicornis CHT1 with other chitinases. The chitinase sequences listed are H. longicornis (this work), B. mori (GenBankTM accession number U86876), M. sexta (GenBankTM accession number U02270), A. aegypti (GenBankTM accession number T14075), Spodoptera litura (GenBankTM accession number AB032107), Chelonus sp. (GenBankTM accession number U10422), Brugia malayi (GenBankTM accession number M73689), Aphanocladium album (GenBankTM accession number X64104). Numbers in parentheses list position in the amino sequence. Asterisks indicate highly conserved residues.

In vitro chitinase activity assay using the purified baculovirus-expressed rCHT1 showed chitin hydrolysis, indicating rCHT1 is a H. longicornis chitinase (Fig. 6). All family 18 chitinases are inhibited by allosamidin (13), and the activity of rCHT1 was inhibited by allosamidin (Fig. 6), indicating H. longicornis chitinase is a family 18 chitinase. Eosinophil chemotactic cytokine (ECF-L) possesses the CXC consensus sequence near the NH2 terminus. This is typical of CXC chemokines, and a comprehensive GenBankTM data base search revealed the ECF-L is a chitinase family protein (42). In addition the functional role for the ELR motif in CXC chemokine-mediated angiogenesis has been observed (43). H. longicornis CHT1 has ELR motifs at amino acid residues 185-187 and 613-615. The purified rCHT1 showed a maximum activity at 45 °C and pH 5-7 (Fig. 7), such as seen in the chitinases of some insects (38, 44). These results suggest that H. longicornis chitinase is a member of the chemokine family.

Chitinase is produced in molting fluid and gut tissues subsequent to feeding at the end of a larval instar in preparation for a molt (25, 45). Examination of flat sections showed a strong reactivity in the cuticle epidermis and midgut of H. longicornis, illustrating the H. longicornis chitinase is abundantly expressed there (Fig. 8). The PM formed in the midgut lumen of blood-sucking arthropods after a blood meal (3, 5) may act as a barrier for invasion of ingested microorganisms (46). Chitin is a key structural component of the PM (3, 47). In support of this, gut specific chitinases have been found, and PM shown to be stronger and more persistent in the guts of mosquitoes fed chitinase inhibitors (47, 48). The existence of PM in ticks has been demonstrated morphologically with Babesia microti passing through it in Ixodes ticks (49). The appearance of H. longicornis chitinase in the midgut (Fig. 8) suggests this chitinase may be involved in controlling turnover and porosity of the chitin-containing PM. The appearance of H. longicornis chitinase in the cuticle epidermis (Fig. 8) implies it acts as a molting enzyme. These results indicate H. longicornis chitinase is a very important enzyme for molting and control of turnover and porosity of the PM in ticks and, thus, is a major candidate as a bio-acaricide.

Baculoviruses have long been attractive biological agents for control of crop pest insect. However, limitations of their use have been a very narrow host range and slow killing rate, resulting in significant crop damage. Recently, viruses with increased host range and improved virulence are being engineered (50, 51). S. frugiperda larvae injected with a transformed AcMNPV expressing M. sexta chitinase died more quickly than those injected with a wild type virus (24). In this study, H. longicornis became infected with AcMNPV·CHT1 (Fig. 9), and rCHT1 was replicated. This is the first report of infection with recombinant insect-baculoviruses in ticks. H. longicornis adults treated with high concentration of ACM died (data not shown) as with M. sexta chitinase (24). Therefore, AcMNPV·CHT1 is a candidate for a potential bio-acaricide. However, to facilitate the use of chitinases in an integrated pest management system as a new and highly selective approach to tick control we must gain much more knowledge.

This study represents the first report of the cloning, identification, and characterization of a tick chitinase, expression of the cDNA in an insect baculovirus, demonstration of the ability of the purified baculovirus expressed rCHT1 to degrade chitin, localization of chitinase in the epidermis and midgut of ticks, and infection of ticks with a recombinant insect-baculovirus. Further studies exploring the usefulness of H. longicornis chitinase as a vaccine and novel bio-acaricide against ticks need to be investigated extensively.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Y. Ando of National Institute of Animal Health for excellent technical assistance. We thank Dr. S. Sakuda (Tokyo University) for providing allosamidin.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by grants-in-aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AB074977.

|| Supported by the program for Promotion of Basic Research Activities for Innovative for Bioscience.

Dagger Dagger Supported by the 21st Center of Excellence program of the Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology. To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-155-49-5646; Fax: 81-155-49-5643; E-mail: fujisaki@obihiro.ac.jp.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 26, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M206831200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: PM, peritrophic membrane; GST, glutathione S-transferase; AcMNPV, A. californica multiple nuclear polyhedrosis virus; 4MU-(GlcNAc)3, 4-methylumbelliferyl-N, N',N''-triacetyl-beta -chitotrioside; ACM, AcMNPV·CHT1 culture medium; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Shao, L., Devenport, M., and Jacobs-lorena, M. (2001) Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 47, 119-125[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. de la Vega, H., Specht, C. A., Liu, Y., and Robbins, P. W. (1998) Insect Mol. Biol. 7, 233-239[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Peters, W. (1992) in Zoophysiology: Peritrophic Membranes (Bradshaw, S. D. , Burggren, W. , Heller, H. C. , Ishii, S. , Langer, H. , Neuweiler, G. , and Randall, D. J., eds), Vol. 130 , Springer-Verlag, Berlin
4. Lehane, M. J. (1997) Annu. Rev. Entomol. 42, 525-550[CrossRef]
5. Richards, A. G., and Richards, P. A. (1977) Annu. Rev. Entomol. 22, 219-240[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Burner, R., Rudin, W., and Hecker, H. (1983) J. Ultrastruct. Res. 83, 195-204[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Terra, W. R. (1990) Annu. Rev. Entomol. 35, 181-200[CrossRef]
8. Pimenta, P. F. P., Modi, G. B., Pereira, S. T., Shahabuddin, M., and Sacks, D. L. (1997) Parasitology 115, 359-369[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Reynolds, S. E., and Samuels, R. I. (1996) Adv. Insect Physiol. 26, 157-232
10. Kimura, S. (1973) J. Insect Physiol. 19, 115-123[CrossRef]
11. Koga, D., Fujimoto, H., Funakoshi, T., Mizuki, Ide, A., Kramer, K. J., Zen, K. C., Choi, H., and Muthukrishnan, S. (1992) Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 22, 305-311[CrossRef]
12. Sakuda, S., Isogai, A., Matsumoto, A., Suzuki, A., and Koseki, K. (1986) Tetrahedron Lett. 27, 2475-2478[CrossRef]
13. Spindler, K. D., and Spindler-Barth, M. (1999) in Chitin and Chitinases (Jollès, P. , and Muzzarelli, R. A. A., eds) , pp. 201-209, Birkhaeuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland
14. Balashov, Y. S. (1972) Misc. Publ. Entomol. Soc. Am. 8, 161-376
15. Hoogstraal, H. (1985) Adv. Parasitol. 24, 135-238[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Fujisaki, K. (1978) Natl. Inst. Anim. Health Quart. (Yatabe) 18, 27-38
17. Fujisaki, K., Kawazu, S., and Kamio, T. (1994) Parasitol. Today 10, 31-33[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Rand, K. N., Moore, T., Srikantha, A., Spring, K., Tellam, R., Willadsen, P., and Cobon, G. S. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 9657-9661[Abstract]
19. Riding, G. A., Jarmey, J., McKenna, R. V., Pearson, R., Cobon, G. S., and Willadsen, P. A. (1994) J. Immunol. 153, 5158-5166[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Zaim, M., and Guillet, P. (2002) Trends Parasitol. 18, 161-163[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Willadsen, P., and Kemp, D. H. (1988) Parasitol. Today 4, 196-198[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. You, M., Xuan, X., Tsuji, N., Kamio, T., Igarashi, I., Nagasawa, H., Mikami, T., and Fujisaki, K. (2001) Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 32, 67-73[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Tsuji, N., Kamio, T., Isobe, T., and Fujisaki, K. (2001) Insect Mol. Biol. 10, 121-129[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Gopalakrishnan, B., Muthukrishnan, S., and Kramer, K. J. (1995) Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 25, 255-265[CrossRef]
25. Kramer, K. J., Corpuz, L. M., Choi, H., and Muthukrishnan, S. (1993) Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 23, 691-701[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Kim, M. G., Shin, S. W., Bae, K. S., Kim, S. C., and Park, H. Y. (1998) Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 28, 163-171[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Chomczynski, P., and Sacchi, N. (1987) Microbiol. Immunol. 162, 156-159
28. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed. , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
29. O'Farrell, P. Z., Goodman, H. M., and O'Farrell, P. H. (1977) Cell 12, 1133-1141[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Tsuji, N., Morales, T. H., Ozols, V. V., Carmody, A. B., and Chandrashekar, R. (1998) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 97, 69-79[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. McCreath, K. J., and Goody, G. W. (1992) J. Microbiol. Methods 14, 229-237[CrossRef]
32. Carmody, W. R. (1961) J. Chem. Educ. 38, 550-559
33. Chandrashekar, R., Tsuji, N., Morales, T., Ozols, V., and Mehta, K. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 531-536[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Rosenfeld, J., Capdevielle, J., Claude, J., Guillemot, C., and Ferrara, P. (1992) Anal. Biochem. 203, 173-179[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Majima, E., Koike, H., Hong, Y-M., Shinohara, Y., and Terada, H. (1993) J. Cell. Biochem. 268, 22181-22187
36. Furuse, M., Fujita, K., Hiiragi, T., Fujimoto, K., and Tsukita, S. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 141, 1539-1550[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Sinnott, M. L. (1990) Chem. Rev. 90, 1171-1202
38. Shinoda, T., Kobayashi, J., Matsui, M., and Chinzei, Y. (2001) Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 25, 521-532
39. Nielsen, H., Engelbrecht, J., Brunak, S., and von Heijne, G. (1997) Protein Eng. 10, 1-6[Abstract]
40. Tarentino, A. L., and Plummer, T. H. (1994) Methods Enzymol. 230, 44-57[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Watanabe, T., Kobori, K., Miyashita, K., Fujii, T., Sakai, S., Uchida, M., and Tanaka, H. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 18567-18572[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Owhashi, M., Arita, H., and Hayai, N. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 1279-1286[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Strieter, R. M., Polverini, P. J., Kunkel, S. L., Arenberg, D. A., Burdick, M. D., Kasper, J., Dzuiba, J., Damme, J. V., Walz, A., Marriott, D., Chan, S. Y., Roczniak, S., and Shanafelt, A. B. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 27348-27357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Zhu, X., Zhang, H., Fukamizo, T., Muthukrishnan, S., and Kramer, K. J. (2001) Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 31, 1221-1230[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Fukamizo, T., and Kramer, K. J. (1987) Insect Biochem. 17, 547-550[CrossRef]
46. Huber, M., Cabib, E., and Miller, L. H. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 2807-2810[Abstract]
47. Shahabuddin, M., Toyoshima, T., Aikawa, M., and Kasow, D. C. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 4266-4270[Abstract]
48. Shen, Z., and Jacobs-Lorena, M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 28895-28900[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Rudzinska, M. A., Spielman, A., Lewengrub, S., Piesman, J., and Karakashian, S. (1982) Cell Tissue Res. 221, 471-481[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Maeda, S., Volrath, S. L., Hanzlik, T. N., Harper, S. A., Majima, K., Maddox, D. W., Hammock, B. D., and Fowler, E. (1991) Virology 184, 777-780[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Tomalski, M. D., and Miller, L. K. (1991) Nature 352, 82-85[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2003 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.



This Article
Abstract
Full Text (PDF)
All Versions of this Article:
278/10/8556    most recent
M206831200v1
Purchase Article
View Shopping Cart
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Citation Map
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Copyright Permissions
Google Scholar
Articles by You, M.
Articles by Fujisaki, K.
Articles citing this Article
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by You, M.
Articles by Fujisaki, K.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.