The Mammalian Cytosolic Selenoenzyme Thioredoxin Reductase Reduces Ubiquinone

A NOVEL MECHANISM FOR DEFENSE AGAINST OXIDATIVE STRESS*

Ling XiaDagger §, Tomas NordmanDagger §, Jerker M. OlssonDagger , Anastassios Damdimopoulos||, Linda Björkhem-BergmanDagger , Ivan Nalvarte||, Lennart C. ErikssonDagger , Elias S. J. Arnér**, Giannis Spyrou§||, and Mikael BjörnstedtDagger §DaggerDagger

From the Dagger  Department of Microbiology, Pathology, and Immunology, Division of Pathology, F46, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge University Hospital, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden, § Södertörns Högskola (University College), SE-141 04 Huddinge, Sweden, the || Department of Biosciences at Novum, Center for Biotechnology, Karolinska Institutet, SE-141 57 Huddinge, Sweden, and the ** Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden

Received for publication, October 11, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The selenoprotein thioredoxin reductase (TrxR1) is an essential antioxidant enzyme known to reduce many compounds in addition to thioredoxin, its principle protein substrate. Here we found that TrxR1 reduced ubiquinone-10 and thereby regenerated the antioxidant ubiquinol-10 (Q10), which is important for protection against lipid and protein peroxidation. The reduction was time- and dose-dependent, with an apparent Km of 22 µM and a maximal rate of about 12 nmol of reduced Q10 per milligram of TrxR1 per minute. TrxR1 reduced ubiquinone maximally at a physiological pH of 7.5 at similar rates using either NADPH or NADH as cofactors. The reduction of Q10 by mammalian TrxR1 was selenium dependent as revealed by comparison with Escherichia coli TrxR or selenium-deprived mutant and truncated mammalian TrxR forms. In addition, the rate of reduction of ubiquinone was significantly higher in homogenates from human embryo kidney 293 cells stably overexpressing thioredoxin reductase and was induced along with increasing cytosolic TrxR activity after the addition of selenite to the culture medium. These data demonstrate that the selenoenzyme thioredoxin reductase is an important selenium-dependent ubiquinone reductase and can explain how selenium and ubiquinone, by a combined action, may protect the cell from oxidative damage.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Thioredoxin reductase is part of a family of pyridine nucleotide oxidoreductases to which glutathione reductase, lipoamide dehydrogenase, and mercuric ion reductase also belong (1). Mammalian cytosolic thioredoxin reductase (TrxR1)1 is a multifunctional homodimeric selenoenzyme with a FAD, a functional disulfide/dithiol, and a penultimate C-terminal selenocysteine residue in each subunit of 58 kDa (2, 3). This selenocysteine residue is essential for catalytic activity and, together with the adjacent cysteine, forms a selenenylsulfide as the active site that is kept reduced by the conserved sequence Cys-Val-Asn-Val-Gly-Cys at the N-terminal of the other subunit (2, 4, 5). TrxR1 has an exceptionally broad substrate specificity, not only reducing thioredoxins from a variety of species but many low molecular compounds as well; it is also a key enzyme in selenium metabolism, reducing selenium compounds to the active form for its own synthesis and for the synthesis of all other selenoproteins (6, 7). TrxR1 is a central enzyme for protection against oxidative stress (8), both directly and linked to antioxidant functions of thioredoxin and peroxiredoxins (8). The role of the enzyme is also implicated in a variety of physiological and pathophysiological processes (7, 9). Directly, TrxR1 may function as a peroxidase, reducing organic hydroperoxides including lipid hydroperoxides, in particular 15-S-HPETE, which is associated with atherosclerosis and lipid peroxidation (10). It may also reduce hydrogen peroxide, a reaction exclusively linked to the selenocysteine residue (4), and also ascorbate (11, 12) and lipoic acid (13).

Ubiquinone is a widely distributed, redox-active quinoid compound originally discovered as an essential part of the mitochondrial respiratory chain in mammals (14). The number of isoprenoid units of the side chain of ubiquinone is specific in different species and is reflected in the nomenclature, e.g. in rat ubiquinone-9 (Q9) and in human ubiquinone-10 (Q10) with 9 and 10 isoprenoid units, respectively. In humans, the reduced form of this molecule, ubiquinol-10, is the only endogenously synthesized lipid-soluble antioxidant. The antioxidant function is predominately protection against lipid and protein peroxidation (15, 16). The actions in peroxidation are mainly to stop the initiation of the reaction by reducing the perferryl radical and to terminate the propagation phase by the regeneration of vitamin E necessary for the reduction of lipidperoxyl radicals (16). Although the antioxidant function requires that ubiquinol be continuously regenerated enzymatically, the non-mitochondrial enzymatic systems involved are characterized only to a limited extent.

The aim of the present study was to characterize the reduction of ubiquinone-10 by thioredoxin reductase. Additionally, we investigated whether the reaction was specific for the mammalian enzyme and hence selenium-dependent, using the smaller non-selenium-containing Escherichia coli enzyme as well as mutant human TrxR and recombinant truncated rat TrxR lacking the last two Sec-Gly residues. We have also probed the reaction in a cellular context using transfected cell lines overexpressing thioredoxin reductase, which were grown with and without the addition of selenite to the culture medium. Based on the results presented here, we conclude that TrxR1 is a major cellular Q10 reductant.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Chemicals-- Tris-malate, Tris-HCl, EDTA, bovine serum albumin, ubiquinone-10, ubiquinone-6, HEPES, glycerol, NADH, and NADPH were obtained from Sigma. Methanol, petroleum ether (b.p. 40-60 °C), 2-propanol (analytical grade), n-hexane (analytical grade), sucrose, CuSO4·5H2O, NaK-tartrate·4H2O, NaOH, Na2CO3, NaCl, Folin-Ciocalteu's phenol reagent, sodium deoxycholate, and ZnCl2 were purchased from Merck (Stockholm, Sweden). Thioredoxin was obtained from Promega, and the thioredoxin reductase from E. coli and calf thymus was from IMCO (Stockholm, Sweden). 2',5'-ADP-Sepharose was purchased from Amersham Biosciences. Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium for cell culturing was purchased from Invitrogen.

Reduction Assay of Ubiquinone-10-- The in vitro incubation with Q10 was performed essentially as described previously (17). In short, the reaction mixture (100 µl) was composed of 50 mM Tris-malate, pH 7.45, 0.4% sodium deoxycholate, 1 mM EDTA (only in the absence of zinc), 2 mM NADH or NADPH, 50 µM ubiquinone-10, and 5 µg of enzyme, and 40 µl of (0.3-1.7 mg of protein) homogenate or 200 µg of cytosolic protein. To determine the effects of the amount of enzyme on the reaction, 1-10 µg were added to the reaction mixture. The effects of pH were investigated in the range of 5-8.5. Q10 was added as a solution in ethanol, but the final concentration of ethanol never exceeded 2%. The incubation time varied from 5-30 min. The experimental tubes were flushed with nitrogen, covered, vortexed, and placed in a water bath for incubation at 37 °C after the addition of all components. The reaction was terminated by the addition of methanol.

Extraction of Ubiquinone-10 and Ubiquinol-10-- Extraction of ubiquinone-10 and ubiquinol-10 was performed essentially as described by Olsson and co-workers (17). In short, at the end of the incubation period, distilled water (400 µl), methanol (5 ml), the internal standard Q6 (0.68 nmol), and petroleum ether (b.p. 40-60 °C) (3 ml) were added. The samples were then mixed by shaking and centrifuged (Labofuge 300, Labex, Helsingborg, Sweden) at 1200 rpm, for 3 min at 25 °C. The upper phase thus obtained was removed and evaporated under nitrogen. The residue was subsequently dissolved in 25 µl of methanol/n-hexane/2-propanol, 2:1:1 (solvent B, see below), and injected directly into the HPLC system. This entire procedure was completed within 10 min (18).

HPLC Analysis-- The extracts were analyzed by reversed-phase HPLC as described by Olsson and co-workers. (17). In short, a column (Hypersil ODS, 3 µm) was employed together with a gradient system; Pump A contained methanol/H2O (9:1), and pump B contained methanol/n-hexane/2-propanol (2:1:1). A linear gradient of 10-50% of solvent B was applied for 15 min, followed by 50-55% of solvent B for 8 min and, finally, 55-100% of solvent B for an additional 3 min, all at a flow rate of 1.5 ml/min and a temperature of 14 °C. The absorbance of the eluate was monitored at 292 nm in a UV spectrophotometer. Ubiquinol-10 and ubiquinone-10 were eluted in two well separated peaks with retention times of 19-20 and 25-26 min, respectively.

Enzyme Assay-- TrxR1 activity in the homogenates and cytosol was determined as described elsewhere (19). From each homogenate and cytosol (HEK-IRES, HEK-TrxR11, HEK-TrxR15) 50 and 25 µg of protein, respectively, was incubated with 80 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 0.9 mg/ml NADPH, 6 mM EDTA, 2 mg/ml insulin, and 10 µM E. coli Trx (Promega) at 37 °C for 20 min in a final volume of 120 µl. A blank, containing everything except Trx, was incubated and treated in the same way as each sample. The reaction was terminated by the addition of 500 µl of DTNB (0.4 mg/ml) in 6 M guanidine-HCl in 0.2 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.0). The absorbance at 412 nm was measured, and the blank was subtracted from the corresponding absorbance of the sample. By comparison with a standard curve prepared by using purified calf thymus TrxR1, the levels of TrxR1 could be determined.

Expression of Mutant Human TrxR (hTrxR5) and Recombinant Full-length and Truncated Rat TrxR-- The hTrxR1 gene was PCR amplified from the pGEMTeasy/hTrxR1 construct using the primers hTrxR1-F2 (5'-CTACTAACCATGGACGGCCCTGAAG-3'), introducing an NcoI restriction site, and hTrxR1-R2 (5'-TCAGCATCCGGACTGGAGGATGCTTGC-3'), introducing a BseA1 restriction site just upstream of the selenocysteine residue. This product was cloned into the pET24d(+) vector (Novagen). The pET-24d/hTrxR1a yields a mutant hTrxR1 (called hTrxR5) with a translated C-terminal extension sequence of Ser-Gly-Leu-Ala-Asn-Gly-Thr-Arg-Pro-Val-Ala-Ala-His in place of the C-terminal amino acids Ala-Gly-Cys-Sec-Gly. The plasmid was transformed into the E. coli strain BL21(DE3). 0.5 liters of the bacteria was grown to an A600 of 0.5, and then isopropyl-1-thio-beta -D-galactopyranoside (IPTG) was added to a final concentration of 0.2 mM to induce the overexpression of the protein. The cells were harvested after 20 h at 25 °C by centrifugation. The pellet was resuspended in 50 mM HEPES-NaOH, pH = 7.5, 0.5 M NaCl, 1% (v/v) Triton X-100 and 1% sarcosyl (w/v), and lysis of the cells was performed by the addition of 300 ml of lysozyme (50 mg/ml) and incubation on ice for 30 min with stirring. Then, 300 ml each of 1 M MgCl2, 0.1 M MnCl2, 1 mg/ml DNase, and 1 mg/ml RNase were added to the lysate, which was further incubated for 45 min. The lysate was subsequently centrifuged, applied to a 2-ml 2',5'-ADP-Sepharose column equilibrated with 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0 buffer with 1 mM EDTA and purified as described (20).

Recombinant rat TrxR1 containing selenocysteine was produced in E. coli as described previously (20), and the two-amino acid truncated form was produced in the same bacterial system by excluding the selenocysteine insertion sequence element, as described (20). Activity of rat TrxR1 was normalized for the selenocysteine-containing fraction, i.e. 20% in the enzyme having 8 units/mg (20).

Construction of Transfected Stable Overexpressing Human Embryo Kidney Cell Lines (HEK293)-- It is well known that transfection for overexpression of selenoproteins is difficult, and hTrxR1 is no exception (21-24). To our surprise, we could nonetheless establish stable cell lines overexpressing hTrxR1 using the following protocol. A detailed molecular characterization of these cells is in progress.2 The primers hTrxR1-F1 (5'-GAATTCACCACCATGGACGGCCCTGAAGATCTTC-3') and hTrxR1-R1-3' and hTrxR1-R1-R1-3'-UTR (5'-CCATTTCTTGAATTCGCCAAATGAGATGAGGACG-3') were used to amplify, by PCR, the hTrxrR1 cDNA from a human adrenal cDNA library and the introduction of EcoR1 restriction sites for subsequent cloning. The construct includes the selenocysteine insertion sequence (SECIS element) and the first three of the six AU-rich elements located in the 3'-UTR (21) and was cloned into the pGEMTeasy vector (Promega) and sequenced. Stable cell lines overexpressing hTrxR1 were subsequently generated using the pIRES vector system (Clontech). The pGEMTasy/hTrxR1 mRNA was cleaved with EcoR1 and ligated into the pIRES vector. 10 µg of the pIRES/hTrxR1 construct was then used to transfect HEK293 cells using polyethyleneimine (PEI) (Aldrich). 0.5 µl of 0.1 M PEI was added to 0.1 µg/µl DNA in water. The mixture was vortexed and incubated for 10 min at room temperature and then added to the cells. The cells were allowed to grow for 2 days without supplementation of sodium selenite and were then passaged. Resistant colonies were selected with 1 mg/ml (HEK-TrxR11) or 1.5 mg/ml (HEK-TrxR15) G418 (Calbiochem). Control cells were prepared by transfecting HEK293 cells with the empty pIRES vector and then selected as above (HEK-IRES). Single resistant colonies were picked, expanded, and analyzed for overexpression by activity measurements and Western blot analysis.

Reselection and Maintenance of Cells-- The HEK293 cells were grown until confluence at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (containing 1 mg/ml glucose) and F-12 nutrient mixture (ratio 1:1) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Invitrogen). The medium was changed every other day. The cells were reselected every 4 weeks with one passage of medium as above containing 1 mg/ml G418. No supplementation of sodium selenite was used in the medium during the maintenance of the cells.

Culturing Cells for Ubiquinone-10 Reduction Experiments-- Each experiment was started with 0.07 × 106 cells per culture dish (100 mm, Sarstedt). The cells were left to adhere for 6 h before adding sodium selenite, where indicated, in different concentrations. 10-12 cell culture dishes were used per concentration. After 72 h the cells were harvested, and homogenates and cytosol were prepared. For the preparation of cytosol, cells were sonicated in 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, and centrifuged at 105,000 × g for 60 min at 4 °C. The protein concentrations were measured according to Lowry (25).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Characterization of the Reduction of Ubiquinone-10 by Purified Bovine TrxR1, Rat TrxR1, E. coli TrxR, Human Mutant TrxR, and Truncated Rat TrxR-- The reduction of ubiquinone-10 by commercially available bovine thioredoxin reductase was characterized (Fig. 1). There was a linear relation between the reduction of Q10 and the amount of enzyme added to the reaction mixture (Fig. 1a) as well as to the time of incubation in the presence of NADPH as cofactor (Fig. 1b). The half-maximal rate of reduction was achieved at a substrate concentration of 22 µM (apparent Km) (Fig. 1c). The maximal rate of reduction in this assay was ~12 nmol of Q10 reduced per milligram of selenoprotein TrxR1 per minute, and similar results were obtained by recombinant rat selenocysteine-containing TrxR1 but not with TrxR forms lacking selenocysteine (Fig. 2). Zinc, which is known to be a potent inhibitor of thiol oxidoreductases (26) with a number of known substrates,3 also inhibited the reduction of Q10 by TrxR1; at a concentration of 50 µM zinc the activity was decreased to 50%, and at 100 µM the activity was only ~15% (Fig. 1d). Furthermore, the pH dependence of the reaction was measured in the interval 5-8.5, and the reaction had a sharp physiological pH optimum of ~7.5 (Fig. 1e).


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Characterization of thioredoxin reductase-mediated reduction of ubiquinone-10 using purified bovine enzyme and NADPH as cofactor. The effects of enzyme concentration (a), time of incubation (b), substrate concentration (c), increasing concentrations of zinc (d), and pH (e) are shown. All data represent the mean value of two to four individual experiments.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Reduction of ubiquinone-10 by recombinant rat thioredoxin reductase (Rat), bovine thioredoxin reductase (Bovine), E. coli thioredoxin reductase (E. coli), human selenocysteine to alanine mutant TrxR (hTrxR5), and truncated rat thioredoxin reductase lacking selenocystein (tTrxR) with NADPH (gray bar) and NADH (striped bar) as cofactors. ***, p < 0.001 compared with bovine and rat TrxR1 using Student's t test.

Fig. 2 shows that there was no difference in the rate of Q10 reduction when NADH was used instead of NADPH as the electron donor. This finding was surprising, because no other known reaction catalyzed by mammalian TrxR1 uses NADH as cofactor with similar rates as NADPH; for example. using lipoamide as substrate for TrxR1, NADH instead of NADPH gives only 5% activity, and with lipoic acid NADH cannot function at all as a reductant (13). Thioredoxin reductase from E. coli did not essentially reduce Q10. The reduction of Q10 was specific for mammalian selenocysteine-containing TrxR1, as shown in Fig. 2. A major difference between E. coli and mammalian TrxR1 is the presence of a redox-active selenolthiol motif formed by a cysteine and a selenocysteine residue in the C-terminal of the mammalian enzyme (2). To further study the importance of the selenium moiety of mammalian TrxR1 for Q10 reduction, mutant human TrxR (hTrxR5) in which the penultimate C-terminal selenocysteine residue was substituted for alanine along with additional amino acids (see "Experimental Procedures") as well as a truncated recombinant rat TrxR lacking the last two amino acids, including the selenocysteine residue (4, 20), were also investigated. These forms of the mammalian enzyme did not essentially reduce Q10, suggesting that the presence of selenocysteine was essential for TrxR1-mediated reduction of Q10 (Fig. 2).

The effects of lowering concentrations of NADPH and NADH on the reduction of Q10 by the recombinant selenocysteine-containing rat TrxR1 showed that the similar rates of reduction using both cofactors were also maintained at lower concentrations (Fig. 3). Thus, the reduction of Q10 differs in this respect compared with the reduction of other known substrates, by TrxR1.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Reduction of Trx and insulin disulfides (a) and Q10 (b) by TrxR1 in the presence of increasing concentrations of NADPH (gray bar) and NADH (striped bar).

Reduction of Ubiquinone-10 in Homogenates from Stable Human Kidney Cell Lines Overexpressing TrxR1-- The identification of TrxR1 as an enzyme regenerating ubiquinol-10 was confirmed by analysis of the relative Q10 reduction rates in homogenates from two selected stable cell lines overexpressing thioredoxin reductase, HEK-TrxR11 and HEK-TrxR15 (Fig. 4). The amounts of active TrxR1 in those cell lines were analyzed using a well established enzyme assay wherein only active enzyme exclusively is measured based upon thioredoxin-linked insulin reduction (Fig. 4a). The amount of endogenous TrxR1 activity of the mock control cell lines (corresponding to 70 ng/mg protein) was set as 100%. The increased TrxR1 activities in the overexpressing cell lines mirrored closely their total capacity to reduce Q10 (Fig. 4b), indicating that TrxR1 indeed reduces Q10 to a major extent also in a cellular context.


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   TrxR1 activity in homogenates from stable transfected human kidney cell lines overexpressing TrxR1 (HEK-TrxR15 and HEK-TrxR11) and mock transfected control cells (HEK-IRES) (a) and the reduction of Q10 in overexpressing and control cell homogenates (b). The results are expressed as percentage of control where the controls are 100%. *, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001 compared with HEK-IRES using Student's t test.

The addition of selenite in increasing concentrations revealed that the activity increased dose dependently in the overexpressing cells but only marginally in the control cells2 as was also shown previously in COS cells with a transient-expression system (27). Optimal activity was achieved at a selenite concentration of 0.1 µM and did not increase further at a concentration of 2 µM. At these concentrations, the activity of TrxR1 was increased 3- and 2-fold in cytosols from HEK-TrxR11 and HEK-TrxR15, respectively, whereas the activity in the mock control, HEK-IRES, was essentially unchanged (Fig. 5a). There was also a corresponding increase in cytosolic ubiquinone-10 reductase activity upon exposure to increasing concentrations of selenite (Fig. 5b).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   The effect of incubation with increased concentrations of selenite on the TrxR1-activity and the reduction of Q10 in cytosol from mock control cells, HEK-IRES (gray bar) cell lines overexpressing TrxR1, HEK-TrxR15 (white bar), and HEK-TrxR11 (striped bar). Cells were grown for 72 h in minimum Eagle's medium/F12 (10% fetal calf serum) supplemented with selenite in indicated concentrations prior to cell harvesting. Data represent the mean of three experiments performed at three different occasions. ***, p < 0.001 (Student's t test) as compared with the mock control (HEK-IRES).


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

This paper demonstrates an important novel function for the selenoenzyme TrxR1 as an ubiquinone-10 reductase implicating a vital function in the protection against oxidative stress. At physiological conditions, the reduction of ubiquinone-10 by mammalian TrxR1 was shown to be the most efficient described to date. Our data using cells overexpressing TrxR1 strongly support the belief that TrxR1 is an important enzyme in the extramitochondrial ubiquinone-10/ubiquinol-10 redox cycle.

The molecular basis for cellular non-mitochondrial Q10 reduction has previously been known only partly. However, the characteristics of the reaction by TrxR1 as found here are nearly identical to the kinetic parameters found in the cytosol from normal rat liver and rat liver nodules.4 For example, in the cytosol >90% of the reductase activity was found in the protein fraction with a molecular mass above 100 kDa (TrxR1; 116 kDa) and the reaction had a pH optimum of 7.5. Also, the reduction of Q10 in rat liver cytosol was inhibited by the addition of zinc to the reaction mixture. The observation that the rate of Q10 reduction was similar with both NADH and NADPH as cofactors using purified enzyme preparations as well as cytosolic protein is surprising and intriguing. Possibly, Q10 slightly affects the conformation of the TrxR1 enzyme so that NADH becomes better accepted as an electron donor or, alternatively and more likely, the relatively low turnover compared with other substrates such as thioredoxin or DTNB, which is probably determined by the rate of reduction of Q10 by the selenolthiol motif, obscures the differences in rates between NADH and NADPH in the first reductive half-reaction. Nonetheless, the increased activity in TrxR1 and the corresponding increase in Q10 reductase activity after the addition of selenite to the transfected cells implicate a direct relation between the reduction of Q10 and the specific activity of TrxR1. In addition, both the expression of Q10 reductase and TrxR1 as well as the levels of ubiquinone-9 were elsewhere found to be increased in the cytosol isolated from neoplastic rat liver nodules4 (28, 29). Taken together, these data support the results presented in this study and strongly suggest that TrxR1 is an important mammalian cytosolic Q10 reductase in normal as well as neoplastic cells. The related enzymes lipoamide dehydrogenase (LipDH) and glutathione reductase (GR) can also reduce ubiquinone, but apparently at lower rates compared with TrxR15 (17) under normal physiological conditions. Moreover, the reduction of Q10 performed by these two enzymes is stimulated by zinc, contrary to TrxR1, which is inhibited by zinc. In addition, the pH optimum for LipDH- and GR-mediated reduction of ubiquinone is acidic5 (30) and not physiological as is the case for the reduction monitored in cytosol extracts and also for the reduction by TrxR1. Although we suggest TrxR1 to be a predominant Q10 reductase in cytosol LipDH, GR and also the previously suggested ubiquinone reductase DT-diaphorase (31) could constitute important systems under other conditions and at other intracellular sites. As all those enzymes are up-regulated in neoplastic rat liver nodules, it might be an important mechanism for increasing ubiquinol regeneration and thereby increasing the antioxidant properties of this lipid in cells highly resistant to oxidative stress.

The thioredoxin system may regulate the activity of several receptors and transcription factors through the reduction of conserved cysteine residues leading to conformational changes with resulting activation/deactivation of gene expression (7, 8). This process is known as thiol redox control and may be especially important during situations of oxidative stress. For instance, reduced Trx that mirrors the activity of TrxR1 prevents apoptosis by inhibition of ASK-1 (32). In addition, several important antioxidant reactions have been directly described for mammalian TrxR1, e.g. the reduction of hydrogen peroxide (4), lipid hydroperoxides (10), ascorbate (11), lipoic acid, and lipoamide (13). The results reported in this paper provide additional evidence that TrxR1 plays an important role in the cellular defense against oxidative stress, because reduction of Q10 could prevent and terminate peroxidation.

The results that showed that the E. coli TrxR1, mutant mammalian TrxR, and truncated rat TrxR forms lacking the penultimate C-terminal selenocysteine residue failed to reduce Q10 demonstrates the specificity for the mammalian enzyme and an essential function for selenocysteine in this reaction. This is in agreement with previous reports of a vital role for selenocysteine in the reduction of other substrates and the participation of a unique selenolthiol/selenenylsulfide motif in the catalytic cycle (2). The background activities detected with the E. coli TrxR and the selenium-deficient recombinant mammalian enzymes were in the same order of magnitude as the direct chemical reaction between FAD and ubiquinone described previously (30). Because all TrxRs contain a FAD in each subunit, we suggest that the background reaction was mainly caused by such a chemical reaction between protein-bound FAD and Q10. However, a slow reaction between Q10 and the thiols of the N-terminal domain part of the active center may not be excluded either (3).

Selenium in low to moderate concentrations is known to induce the expression of several selenoenzymes, including thioredoxin reductases and glutathione peroxidases (33). Several reports have shown a relation between the levels of ubiquinone and selenium (34, 35). The molecular basis for this relation has not, however, been established. Our data now provide an explanation; TrxR1-mediated reduction of Q10 is dependent on its selenocysteine. We therefore conclude that the cytosolic cellular selenoenzyme TrxR1 is a link between the function of the antioxidant compound ubiquinol-10 and the trace element selenium.

    FOOTNOTES

* This investigation was supported by grants from the Swedish Cancer Society, the Swedish Medical Association, the Karolinska Institutet, and Medical Research Council Grant 13X-10370.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

These authors contributed equally to this work.

Dagger Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Microbiology, Pathology and Immunology, Karolinska Inst., Division of Pathology, F46, Huddinge University Hospital, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden. Tel.: 46-8-58583809; Fax: 46-8-58581020; E-mail: mikael.bjornstedt@impi.ki.se.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, November 14, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M210456200

2 I. Nalvarte, A. Damdimopoulos, T. Nordman, J. M. Olsson, M. Björnstedt, E. S. J. Arnér, and G. Spyrou, manuscript in preparation.

3 L. Xia, T. Nordman, J. M. Olsson, and M. Björnstedt, unpublished observations.

4 L. Xia, M. Björnstedt, T. Nordman, L. Björkhem-Bergman, L. Eriksson, and J. M. Olsson, submitted for publication.

5 T. Nordman, M. Björnstedt, and J. M. Olsson, manuscript in preparation.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: Trx, thioredoxin; TrxR1, Trx reductase 1; Sec, selenocysteine; Q10, ubiquinone-10; HEK293, human embryo kidney cells; PEI, polyethyleneimine; IRES, internal ribosome entry sequence; DTNB, 5,5'-dithiobis(nitrobenzoic acid); HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Williams, C. H., Jr. (1992) in Chemistry and Biochemistry of Flavoenzyme (Müller, F., ed), Vol. 3 , pp. 121-211, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL
2. Zhong, L., Arnér, E. S. J., and Holmgren, A. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 5854-5859[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Sandalova, T., Zhong, L., Lindqvist, Y., Holmgren, A., and Schneider, G. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 9533-9538[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Zhong, L., and Holmgren, A. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 18121-18128[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Lee, S. R., Bar-Noy, S., Kwon, J., Levine, R. L., Stadtman, T. C., and Rhee, S. G. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 2521-2526[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Holmgren, A., Arnér, E. S. J., Åslund, F., Björnstedt, M., Zhong, L., Ljung, J., Nakamura, H., and Nikitovic, D. (1998) in Oxidative Stress in Cancer, Aids, and Neurodegenerative Diseases (Montagnier, L. , Olivier, R. , and Pasquier, C., eds) , pp. 229-46, Marcel Dekker, Inc., Paris
7. Arnér, E. S. J., and Holmgren, A. (2000) Eur. J. Biochem. 267, 6102-6109[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Nordberg, J., and Arnér, E. S. J. (2001) Free Radic. Biol. Med. 31, 1287-1312[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Becker, K., Gromer, S., Schirmer, R. H., and Muller, S. (2000) Eur. J. Biochem. 267, 6118-6125[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Björnstedt, M., Hamberg, M., Kumar, S., Xue, J., and Holmgren, A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 11761-11764[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. May, J. M., Mendiratta, S., Hill, K. E., and Burk, R. F. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 22607-22610[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Li, X., Hill, K. E., Burk, R. F., and May, J. M. (2001) FEBS Lett. 508, 489-492[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Arnér, E. S. J., Nordberg, J., and Holmgren, A. (1996) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 225, 268-274[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Ernster, L., Lee, I. Y., Norling, B., and Persson, B. (1969) Eur. J. Biochem. 9, 299-310[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Frei, B., Kim, M. C., and Ames, B. N. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 4879-4883[Abstract]
16. Ernster, L. (1993) in Active Oxygens, Lipid Peroxides, and Antioxidants. (Yagi, K., ed) , pp. 1-38, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL
17. Olsson, J. M., Xia, L., Eriksson, L. C., and Björnstedt, M. (1999) FEBS Lett. 448, 190-192[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Stål, P., Olsson, J., Svoboda, P., Hultcrantz, R., Harms-Ringdahl, M., and Eriksson, L. C. (1997) J. Hepatol. 27, 562-571[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Holmgren, A., and Björnstedt, M. (1995) Methods Enzymol. 252, 199-208[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Arnér, E. S. J., Sarioglu, H., Lottspeich, F., Holmgren, A., and Böck, A. (1999) J. Mol. Biol. 292, 1003-1016[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Gasdaska, J. R., Harney, J. W., Gasdaska, P. Y., Powis, G., and Berry, M. J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 25379-25385[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Gasdaska, P. Y., Berggren, M. M., Berry, M. J., and Powis, G. (1999) FEBS Lett. 442, 105-111[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Hofmann, E. R., Boyanapalli, M., Lindner, D. J., Weihua, X., Hassel, B. A., Jagus, R., Gutierrez, P. L., Kalvakolanu, D. V., and Hofman, E. R. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 6493-6504[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Ma, X., Hu, J., Lindner, D. J., and Kalvakolanu, D. V. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 22460-22468[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J. (1951) J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265-275[Free Full Text]
26. Gazaryan, I. G., Krasnikov, B. F., Ashby, G. A., Thorneley, R. N., Kristal, B. S., and Brown, A. M. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 10064-10072[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Fujiwara, N., Fujii, T., Fujii, J., and Taniguchi, N. (1999) Biochem. J. 340, 439-444[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Björkhem, L., Teclebrhan, H., Kesen, E., Olsson, J. M., Eriksson, L. C., and Björnstedt, M. (2001) J. Hepatol. 35, 259-264[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Olsson, J. M., Eriksson, L. C., and Dallner, G. (1991) Cancer Res. 51, 3774-3780[Abstract]
30. Xia, L., Björnstedt, M., Nordman, T., Eriksson, L. C., and Olsson, J. M. (2001) Eur. J. Biochem. 268, 1486-1490[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Beyer, R. E., Segura-Aguilar, J., Di, Bernardo, S., Cavazzoni, M., Fato, R., Fiorentini, D., Galli, M. C., Setti, M., Landi, L., and Lenaz, G. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 2528-2532[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Saitoh, M., Nishitoh, H., Fujii, M., Takeda, K., Tobiume, K., Sawada, Y., Kawabata, M., Miyazono, K., and Ichijo, H. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 2596-2606[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Gladyshev, V. N., and Kryukov, G. V. (2001) Biofactors 14, 87-92[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Vadhanavikit, S., and Ganther, H. E. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 190, 921-926[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Vadhanavikit, S., and Ganther, H. E. (1994) Mol. Aspects Med. 15, S103-S107[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2003 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.