Mechanism of Ribosomal p70S6 Kinase Activation by Granulocyte Macrophage Colony-stimulating Factor in Neutrophils

COOPERATION OF A MEK-RELATED, THR421/SER424 KINASE AND A RAPAMYCIN-SENSITIVE, mTOR-RELATED THR389 KINASE*

Jason A. Lehman {ddagger}, Victor Calvo § and Julian Gomez-Cambronero {ddagger} 

From the {ddagger}Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Wright State University School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio 45435 and the §Instituto de Investigaciones Biomedicas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Facultad Medicina Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Arturo Duperier 4, 28029 Madrid, Spain

Received for publication, January 13, 2003 , and in revised form, April 28, 2003.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We report here for the first time the detection of the ribosomal p70S6 kinase (p70S6K) in a hematopoietic cell, the neutrophil, and the stimulation of its enzymatic activity by granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). GM-CSF modified the Vmax of the enzyme (from 7.2 to 20.5 pmol/min/mg) and induced a time- and dose-dependent phosphorylation on p70S6K residues Thr389 and Thr421/Ser424. The immunosuppressant macrolide rapamycin caused either a decrease in intensity of phospho-Thr389 bands in Western blots, or as a downshift in the relative mobility of phospho-Thr421/Ser424 bands (consistent with the loss of phosphate), but not both simultaneously. The immunosuppressant FK506 failed to inhibit p70S6K activation, but was able to rescue the rapamycin-induced downshift, pointing to a role for the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) kinase. Rapamycin also caused an inhibition (IC50 0.2 nM) of the in vitro enzymatic activity of p70S6K. However, the inhibition of activity was not complete, but only a 40–50%, indicating that neutrophil p70S6K activity has a rapamycin-resistant component. This component was totally inhibited by pre-incubating the cells with the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) kinase (MEK) inhibitor PD-98059 prior to treatment with rapamycin. This indicated that a kinase from the MEK/MAPK pathway also plays a role in p70S6K activation. Thus, GM-CSF causes the dual activation of a rapamycin-resistant, MAPK-related kinase, that targets Thr421/Ser424 S6K phosphorylation, and a rapamycin-sensitive, mTOR-related kinase, that targets Thr389, both of which are needed in cooperation to achieve full activation of neutrophil p70S6K.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
p70S6K1 catalyzes the phosphorylation of the S6 protein (13), a component of the 40 S subunit of eukaryotic ribosomes. It plays a role in protein synthesis (4) and in cell growth control during G1 phase, since p70S6K-deficient Drosophila and p70S6K knockout mice show significantly reduced body sizes (56). Two main S6K isoforms (S6K1 and S6K2) are encoded by different genes (711). Ribosomal S6K1 has multiple phosphorylation sites, the most critical residues being Thr229, Thr389, and Ser404 (12, 13). In addition, a "module IV" containing Ser411, Ser418, Thr421, and Ser424 are phosphorylated in tandem prior to full activation of the enzyme (3). Phosphorylation of Thr412 and Ser371 plays a central role in the regulation of p70S6K activity in vivo (13, 14).

In the living cell, ribosomal p70S6K is activated through a complex network of signaling molecules (15, 16). The generation of 3-phosphoinositide lipid products by PI3K is required for the phosphorylation of two activating sites in p70S6K: Thr229 and Thr389 (17, 18). Thr229 is phosphorylated by PDK1 (19, 20) and Thr389 can be phosphorylated by PDK1 (18) but also by several other kinases: NEK6/7 (21), mTOR (also known as FRAP) (12, 22), Akt, and PKC{zeta} (23). The formation of a ternary complex between the regulatory subunit of PI3K (p85), mTOR, and p70S6K is necessary for the activation of the latter (24).

The cytokines IL-3, EPO, and IL-2 induce activation of p70S6K (2527), as well as cellular proliferation. Both responses are inhibited with rapamycin, an immunosuppressant drug that complexes with FKBP and binds to mTOR, resulting in the dephosphorylation of p70S6K (3, 28). Growth factor-induced activation of p70S6K and G1 phase cell cycle progression are also blocked by rapamycin or by p70S6K-specific antibodies (25, 26, 29, 30). The structural analog of rapamycin, FK506, competitively binds to FKBP and reverses the inhibition of mTOR by the former (31).

Polymorphonuclear leukocytes (neutrophils) are recruited to sites of inflammation responding to chemoattractants that are secreted by several tissue cells in response to a physical or chemical insult, or by certain bacterial products in the case of a localized infection. The cytokine GM-CSF elicits the two components of cell migration in neutrophils: chemotaxis and chemokinesis.2 GM-CSF has a number of other functions on neutrophils and their bone marrow precursors, that involve the activation of two major signaling cascades: the JAK/STAT and Ras/MAPK pathways (reviewed in Ref. 33). GM-CSF-induced translocation of p42mapk (ERK2) to the cell nucleus and concomitant phosphorylation of the ribosomal kinase p90rsk is central in mitogenic events. Although it has been shown that G-CSF, a human hematopoietic factor related to GM-CSF, activates PI-3K/Akt(PKB) and promotes cell survival (34), little information exists regarding activation of other members of this cell signaling cascade, particularly p70S6K or whether GM-CSF will mediate its physiological effects (notably cell migration) through mTOR-S6K.

We have previously demonstrated that MAPK activation in response to GM-CSF is up-regulated in mature cells such as the neutrophil and plays a role in chemotaxis (35), and that a molecular connection between the MAPK and the p70S6K pathways exists (36). Here we report that p70S6K is present in neutrophils, that GM-CSF causes an increase in phosphorylation of Thr389 and Thr421/Ser424 concomitantly to an increase in its enzymatic activity. We also show for the first time that the mechanism by which GM-CSF activates ribosomal S6K is through a combination of activation of two signaling pathways: mTOR and MAPK.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Materials and Antibodies—GM-CSF was from Sandoz (East Hanover, NJ); G-CSF was from Amgen (Thousand Oaks, CA); IL-8 was from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN); fMet-Leu-Phe, PKA inhibitor, calphostin-C, PMA, anti-rabbit IgG (agarose beads), the cAMP-dependent kinase inhibitor TTYADFIASGRTGRRNAIHD, anti-p70S6 kinase polyclonal antibody used for immunoblotting, and phalloidin-FITC conjugate conjugate from Amanita phalloides, were from Sigma; FACS FLOW buffer was from Fisher (Hanover Park, IL); electrophoresis chemicals were from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Richmond, CA); [{gamma}-32P]ATP (30 Ci/mmol) was from Amersham Biosciences; PD-98059 was from BioMol (Plymouth Meeting, PA); rapamycin, FK506 and alkaline phosphatase (purified from calf intestine) were from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA); ion-exchange chromatography cellulose phosphate paper was from Whatman (Hillsboro, OR); anti-p70S6 kinase (C-18) polyclonal antibody used for immunoprecipitation was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA); anti-phospho(Thr389)-p70S6 kinase and anti-phospho(Thr421/Ser424)-p70S6 kinase antibodies (polyclonal) were from Cell Signaling (Beverly, MA); p70S6 kinase peptide substrate KKRNRTLTK and 3T3 fibroblasts cell lysates were from Upstate Biotechnology Inc. (Lake Placid, NY).

Cells—Peripheral blood neutrophils were isolated based on a protocol described by English and Andersen (37). Between 50–55 ml of blood were collected from the antecubital vein of healthy individuals (who signed an Institutional Review Board-approved consent form) using sodium citrate as anticoagulant. Blood was mixed with 15 ml of 6% dextran, allowed to settle, and the plasma and buffy coat were removed and spun down at 800 x g for 5 min. The pellet was resuspended in 35 ml of saline and centrifuged again for 15 min at 10 °C in a Ficoll-Histopaque discontinuous gradient. Neutrophils were recovered and contaminating erythrocytes were lysed by hypotonic shock. Cells were washed and the purified neutrophil pellet was resuspended in Hanks Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS). Our experience has indicated that using this protocol, neutrophil aggregation (i.e. the hallmark for neutrophil activation) does not occur. Viability is usually >98 ± 2% as per trypan blue exclusion. Cells were resuspended at the concentration of 5 x 106 cells/ml in fresh Hanks Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) or in RPMI at 2 x 106 cells/ml at the time of the experiment, and used within 2–3 h after isolation.

Immunoprecipitation and Western Blotting Analyses—The procedure was based on our previous report (38) with some modifications, as follows. Neutrophils were resuspended in RPMI 1640 at 3 x 106 cells/ml density and were pretreated with rapamycin, FK506, or MEKi where appropriate and then stimulated with GM-CSF at 37 °C. Aliquots (1 ml) were taken, spun down (14,000 x g, 15 s) and pellets were resuspended in 0.2 ml of boiling SDS solution (1% SDS in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4). Samples were boiled in a heat block for 10 min with frequent vortexing to achieved complete dissolution, taken to an ice bucket and mixed with 0.3 ml cold ddH2O and 0.4 ml of cold, Triton X-100-based, lysis buffer (12 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2, 0.75 mM NaCl, 100 µM sodium orthovanadate, 10 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.2 mM {beta}-glycerophosphate, 5 µg/ml each of aprotinin, pepstatin A, and leupeptin, and 0.12% Triton X-100). The resulting 1 ml of total cell lysates were spun down (14,000 x g, 1 min, 4 °C) to remove any insoluble material and then used for immunoprecipitation. For this, the primary antibody (anti-p70S6K) was previously mixed at a final concentration of 2 µg/ml with anti-rabbit (IgG, whole molecule) antibody conjugated to agarose beads in lysis buffer for 4 h at 4 °C. The beads were then thoroughly washed and mixed with total cell lysates prepared as indicated above at a ratio agarose beads/cell lysates 1:8 (v/v). After a 2-h incubation period at 4 °C, immune complexes were recovered by centrifugation (7,000 x g, 1 min, 4 °C). Pellets were washed twice with lysis buffer, twice with buffer A (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 400 mM LiCl) and twice with buffer B (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA). Immune complex beads were resuspended in a final volume of 60 µl with lysis buffer and mixed with 2x-SDS sample buffer (1:1 v/v) for subsequent protein gel electrophoresis/immunoblotting. Resulting gels were transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes and used for immunoblotting. In several experiments, parallel blots were probed with the same antibody used for immunoprecipitation, to confirm that protein loading was similar (kept at <5% by measuring protein in samples by Bradford assay before loading) and that the small, unavoidable, differences in protein per lane can not account for differences in phosphorylation seen with the anti-phosphoantibodies.

Immunocomplex p70S6 Kinase Assay—Ribosomal p70S6K enzymatic activity was quantified by using an immunocomplex kinase assay as reported previously (35, 36, 38) tailored to measure this particular kinase activity in human neutrophils. Neutrophils were resuspended in RPMI 1640 at 3 x 106 cells/ml density and were pretreated with rapamycin, FK506, or MEKi where appropriate and then stimulated with GM-CSF at 37 °C. Cells were spun down (14,000 x g, 15 s) and pellets were resuspended in 0.3 ml of ice-cold, TRIS-based, lysis buffer (see above for composition) and incubated on ice for 15 min with occasional vortexing. Lysates were obtained after centrifugation (7,000 x g, 1 min, 4 °C) in supernatants were mixed with the antibody conjugated to agarose beads as indicated above. Immune complex beads were resuspended in a final volume of 40 µl with of ice-cold lysis buffer (diluted 1:10) and used in an in vitro kinase assay. For this, the phosphoacceptor peptide substrate for this assay was 75 µM of the S6 kinase substrate peptide KKRNRTLTK in freshly prepared kinase buffer (13.4 mM HEPES, pH 7.3, 25 mM MgCl2, 30 µM Na2VO3, 5 mM p-nitrophenyl phosphate, 2 mM EGTA, 2 µM cAMP-dependent kinase inhibitor TTYADFIASGRTGRRNAIHD, 0.420 µCi [{gamma}-32P]ATP (7 nM), and 68 µM unlabeled ATP). 1 µg of cAMP-dependent kinase inhibitor inhibits 2,000–6,000 phosphorylating units of PKA (equivalent to the transference of 2–6 nmol of phosphate from ATP). To initiate the phosphotransferase reaction, aliquots (20 µl) of kinase buffer containing the appropriate substrates were mixed 1:3 (v/v) with the cell lysates or immunocomplex beads. The reaction was carried out at 37 °C for 20 min in a rotator and terminated by blotting 40 µl of the reaction mixture onto P81 ion exchange chromatography cellulose phosphate papers. Filter squares were washed, dried, and counted for radioactivity. Controls were run in parallel with no S6 kinase substrate peptide. Counts were subtracted from samples. In some experiments, ribosomes were used as the natural p70S6K substrate following the in vitro kinase assay just indicated. Protein S6 is part of a multiprotein-rRNA complex that is multiphosphorylated on Ser residues in vitro in response to mitogenic stimulation. 40 S ribosomal subunits were prepared from Xenopus laevis at the concentration of 0.1–0.25 mg/ml following the procedure described in Ref. 11.

Alkaline Phosphatase Treatment—SDS-boiled samples as indicated in the immunoprecipitation and Western blotting analyses section above were diluted with 0.3 ml of cold H2O and 0.4 ml cold, Triton X-100-based, lysis buffer. The alkaline phosphatase enzyme (calf intestine-purified) was added in a 160 µl of total volume of freshly prepared, cold, alkaline phosphatase buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 1mM MgCl2, and 0.1 mM ZnCl2). To initiate the phosphate removal reaction, 48 µl of 3 M Tris-base, pH 12.5 were added to each sample to achieve a favorable reaction pH of 10.0 ± 0.5. Samples were lightly vortexed and incubated at 37 °C for 45 min with slight agitation. The reaction was stopped by placing the samples on an ice bucket and adding to each reaction tube a small volume of 10 M Tris-HCl, pH 3.0 in order to bring the reaction pH to 7.0. Samples were used immediately for immunoprecipitation using anti-p70S6K antibodies, as indicated above.

F-actin Measurement by Flow Cytometry—Neutrophils were stained with phalloidin-FITC as described (39) with some modifications. Briefly, F-actin polymerization was initiated in vivo by the addition of GM-CSF to a neutrophil cell suspension (5 x 106 cells/ml) for 5 min at 37 °C. After this, 0.2-ml aliquots were taken and mixed with 1 ml of pre-chilled fixing solution (two parts of double-concentrated phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, one part of 20% formaldehyde and one part of 75% glycerol in water). Samples were stored at –80 °C until ready for flow cytometry. At that time, samples were thawed and spun down for 5 min at 600 x g in a refrigerated Eppendorf microcentrifuge. Pellets were resuspended in freshly prepared F-actin staining solution (35 µlofa3.3 mg/ml methanol FITC-phalloidin stock plus 315 µl of H2O, and stained in the dark for 30 min at room temperature. Samples were centrifuged as above, and pellets were resuspended in 1 ml of FACS FLOW. They were then analyzed by flow cytometry on a FACSCAN Becton & Dickinson flow cytometer at 488 nm excitation wavelength. Data was analyzed using Cell Quest software and expressed as fluorescence intensity.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Human Neutrophils Express p70S6K and GM-CSF Increases Its Activity and Phosphorylation Status—We demonstrate here that neutrophils express this protein in sufficient amounts to be clearly detected by immunoblotting using antibodies directed against the ribosomal p70S6K (Fig. 1A). A major band shows the predicted molecular weight for the mammalian S6K1 isoform. We were also able to detect its enzymatic activity in vitro in whole cell lysates and in anti-p70S6K immunoprecipitates. The detection of p70S6K activity is presented in Fig. 1B, with GM-CSF causing a significant and reproducible increase of total S6K activity. Accurate confirmation of ribosomal p70S6K activity is given by the fact that 32P incorporation into the substrate peptide KKRNRTLTK and ribosomal 40 S subunits (containing the natural substrate protein S6), was observed after anti-p70S6K immunoprecipitation. GM-CSF increased basal activity by ~3-fold in immunocomplexes. The complete biochemical characterization of p70S6K in neutrophils is presented in Fig. 2, A–D. A ~3-fold activation due to GM-CSF is consistently seen when activity is expressed as a function of time, protein concentration and substrate concentration (Fig. 2, A–C). Moreover, there is a considerable change in Vmax (from 7.2 to 20.5 pmol/min/mg protein) and also in the Km (from 26.1 to 15.4 µM) by GM-CSF stimulation (Fig. 2D) that makes GM-CSF a bona fide p70S6K physiological stimulator in neutrophils.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
p70S6K protein and its activity in human neutrophils. A, presence of p70S6K protein in human neutrophil cells by Western blotting. Neutrophils were resuspended at the density of 1 x 107 cells/ml and incubated with either buffer (Control) or with 1 nM GM-CSF (GM-CSF) for 3 min. Cell lysates were obtained and analyzed by SDS/PAGE gel electrophoresis followed by immunoblotting. Western blots were probed with anti-p70S6K antibodies. Molecular mass (in kDa) protein standards are marked on the right. B, detection of p70S6K enzymatic activity in human neutrophil cells. Cells were incubated in the absence (black bars) or in the presence of GM-CSF (gray bars). Cells lysates were divided into three sets. The first set (lysates) was used as such to measure p70S6K activity against 75 µM of the S6 kinase substrate peptide KKRNRTLTK. The second set was subjected to immunoprecipitation (immunocomplexes) with anti-p70S6K antibodies, followed by an in vitro kinase activity assay in the presence of [{gamma}-32P]ATP and either 75 µM of KKRNRTLTK (p70S6K peptide substrate) or 40 S ribosomal subunits from Xenopus laevis at the concentration of 0.1–0.25 mg/ml (ribosomal 40S subunits). Panel A shows a representative experiment among four. Results for B are the mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments performed in duplicate.

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
Biochemical characterization of neutrophil p70S6K. Neutrophils were challenged with GM-CSF and treated as indicated above. The kinase assay was performed against the KKRNRTLTK (p70S6K peptide substrate). Activity was measured as a function of incubation time of the in vitro enzyme assay (A); protein concentration (B), and substrate concentration at 0.5–0.7 mg/ml protein (C). From C, a Lineweaver-Burk plot was derived (D) from which the Vmax and Km values were calculated.

 

After protein, activity and kinetic measurements, we next investigated whether GM-CSF was able to induce the phosphorylation of p70S6K in human neutrophils. As seen in Fig. 3A, GM-CSF induces a rapid (3 min) phosphorylation of p70S6K on Thr389, which is one of the residues critical for S6K activation. The migration of the phosphorylated band in SDS gels very well coincides with that of the 3T3 fibroblast controls. Also, GM-CSF induces phosphorylation of p70S6K on two other residues, Thr421/Ser424 (Fig. 3B), that are also key for conferring enzyme activity. The effect is dose-dependent, clearly noticeable with GM-CSF concentration as low as 0.5 nM.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
Phosphorylated species of p70S6K in GM-CSF-stimulated neutrophils. A, presence of phospho(Thr389)p70S6K species. Neutrophils were stimulated with (+) or without (–) GM-CSF for 3 min, and lysates were prepared in boiling SDS buffer, followed by immunoprecipitation (I.P.) with anti-p70S6K and analyzed by Western blotting (W.B.) with anti-phospho(Thr389)p70S6K antibodies. As controls, lysates of NIH 3T3 fibroblast previously stimulated with (+) or without (–) serum, were run in parallel and probed with the same antibody. B, presence of phospho(Thr421/Ser424)-p70S6K species: dose response with GM-CSF. Cells were stimulated with the indicated GM-CSF concentrations for 3 min, and samples were prepared as above.

 

Fig. 4 shows that the increase in both phosphorylation and enzyme activity elicited by GM-CSF are time-dependent. A maximum phosphorylation at 3 min is seen for phospho-Thr421/Ser424 (Fig. 4A) as well as for phospho-Thr389 (Fig. 4B). Phosphorylation of Thr389 is seen as an increase in density of the immunoprecipitated p70 band. The Thr421/Ser424 dual phosphorylation is seen at 3–5 min post GM-CSF, and is demonstrated by both a robust increase in density of the immunoprecipitated p70 band and by an upward mobility shift (Fig. 4A). The figure also shows results of immunoprecipitation with anti-p70S6K antibody and immunoblotting with the same antibody to demonstrate equal loading (Fig. 4C). In vitro kinase activity experiments also reveal a time-dependent increase due to GM-CSF (Fig. 4D). Maximal activity is reached at 5 min and declines slightly thereafter, and as such, the biphasic pattern of phosphorylation seen in Fig. 4, A and B correlated with enzymatic activity.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
Time course of p70S6K activation. Neutrophils were stimulated with 10 nM GM-CSF for the indicated lengths of time. Cell lysates were obtained, immunoprecipitated with anti-p70S6K antibodies, and immunocomplex beads were utilized for Western blotting with the indicated antibodies (A–C) or for assaying p70S6K enzymatic activity in vitro (D). Panel C confirms that protein loading is similar and that the small differences in protein per lane (kept at <5% by measuring protein in samples by Bradford assay before loading) can not account for differences in phosphorylation.

 

Thus, the results presented in Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4 demonstrate that p70S6K is expressed in human neutrophils, that GM-CSF increased its enzymatic activity in a time and dose-dependent fashion, changes the Vmax for its peptide substrate, and that this cytokine induces robust phosphorylation in 3 key residues: Thr389, Thr421, and Ser424.

mTOR Is Involved in GM-CSF-activated p70S6K in Neutrophils—The next series of experiments were aimed at investigating what the mechanism that accounts for the observed increases in both phosphorylation and activity, was. Our first approach was the use of the immunosuppressant drug rapamycin, a well known inhibitor of mTOR, one of the several upstream regulators of p70S6K (17). In neutrophils, rapamycin inhibited GM-CSF-stimulated p70S6K Thr389 phosphorylation in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 5A). The intensity of phospho-Thr389 signal all but disappears at 10 nM.



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.
Effect of rapamycin on GM-CSF-stimulated p70S6K Thr389 phosphorylation. Neutrophils were incubated with the indicated concentrations of rapamycin for 45 min, followed by a short (3 min) incubation with 10 nM GM-CSF. Shown are Western blots of anti-p70S6K immunoprecipitates probed with anti-phospho-Thr389-p70S6K and with anti-p70S6K antibodies to show equal protein loading.

 

The effect of rapamycin on the dual phosphorylation Thr421/Ser424 was also very profound, but manifested itself differently and warranted close examination. Fig. 6A shows that rapamycin causes a dramatic downward mobility shift in the phospho-Thr421/Ser424 band observed in the presence of GM-CSF. In this study, for the sake of clarification, we have labeled the lower band in GM-CSF + rapamycin as a and the upper band in GM-CSF alone as b. A shift from the upper b to lower a band observed with rapamycin treatment, is consistent with p70S6K dephosphorylation, as a less phosphorylated species runs faster in SDS-PAGE. Also shown in Fig. 6A (to the right) is a representative Western blot of fibroblast lysates to provide yet one more relative mobility comparison. The upper b band in GM-CSF-treated neutrophils has a Mr similar to that of serum-treated fibroblasts. Fig. 6A also shows that, in contrast to what was observed with phospho-Thr389 where the intensity signal disappeared with rapamycin + GM-CSF (Fig. 5A), a positive signal is still present to anti-phospho-Thr421/Ser424 antibodies, indicating that phosphorylation of Thr421/Ser424 was not completely affected by rapamycin.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.
Effect of rapamycin on GM-CSF-stimulated p70S6K Thr421/Ser424 phosphorylation. A, neutrophils were incubated with 1 nM rapamycin for 45 min, followed by a short (3 min) incubation with 10 nM GM-CSF and cell lysates in boiling SDS were generated and immunoprecipitation with anti-p70S6K followed. Resulting immunocomplexes were used for immunoblotting with anti-phospho-Thr421/Ser424-p70S6K antibodies. As controls, lysates of NIH3T3 fibroblasts previously stimulated with (+) or without (–) serum, were run in parallel and probed with the same antibody. Arrows on the left show the relative mobility of less phosphorylated (a) and hyperphosphorylated (b) p70S6K species (see text for details). B, dose response with rapamycin. Neutrophils were incubated with the indicated concentrations of rapamycin for 45 min, and then challenged for 3 min with GM-CSF. Samples were processed as above. Anti-p70S6K immunoprecipitates were run in SDS gels and Western blots were probed with anti-Thr421/Ser424-p70S6K. After films were obtained, the blots were stripped of the antibody with a SDS/{beta}-mercaptoethanol solution at 50 °C for 15 min, and they were then probed with anti-p70S6K antibodies, to show equal protein loading in all lanes and to confirm that the small differences in protein per lane (kept at <5% by measuring protein in samples by Bradford assay before loading) can not account for differences in phosphorylation. C, dephosphorylation by alkaline phosphatase. Neutrophils were treated as in A, and lysates were mixed with alkaline phosphatase at the indicated concentrations at a pH of 10. After phosphatase action, samples were immunoprecipitated and Western blots were probed with anti-phospho-Thr421/Ser424 antibodies.

 

To ascertain if the signal to Thr421/Ser424 antibodies still remained simply because there was not enough rapamycin to inhibit it, we analyzed the status of this dual phosphorylation in response to GM-CSF with a range of rapamycin concentrations. Fig. 6B confirms that concentrations of rapamycin as low as 0.5 nM had already increased the mobility of p70S6K, and this effect remains present at all concentrations tested. A weakened signal to the antibody was noticeable at higher concentrations (with similar protein loading in the SDS gel, as shown in Fig. 6B), but the signal was not completely eliminated, even at a concentration of 50 nM. Thus, rapamycin causes a potent change in electrophoretic mobility of p70S6K but there was still a rapamycin-resistant component of phosphorylation.

A partial inhibition of p70S6K by rapamycin is not entirely unlikely. Although it was originally described as a blocker of agonist-stimulated p70S6K activity in several cell lines (11, 29, 31), rapamycin may have differential effects on other systems. A dissociation between TOR kinase activity and rapamycin action has been already described (40, 41). Additionally, a recent example of discrepancy between rapamycin inhibition and p70S6K activity could be found in (42). At any rate, an inhibitor of a S6K cellular pool should be enough to explain the profound physiological effect of rapamycin on chemotaxis.3

We needed to prove that the mobility downshift from b to a is indeed due to the disappearance of phosphorylated residues. For this, we performed the following control experiment: we treated GM-CSF-stimulated neutrophil lysates with increasing concentrations of alkaline phosphatase in vitro. Then, we used the lysates to perform p70S6K immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting in a fashion similar to that followed in the previous experiments. Fig. 6C shows that as the phosphatase concentration increases for 10–80 units/ml, the phosphorylated p70S6K band shifts from the original b position (GM-CSF-stimulated cells, no alkaline phosphatase added) to the lower a position. This position is equivalent to the rapamycin-treated GM-CSF-stimulated cells (Fig. 6, A and B). We therefore concluded that a shift of the nature observed in pp70S6K with rapamycin is, in effect, due to the loss of phosphate. Further, the maximum dose of alkaline phosphatase used in this experiment (80 units/ml), provides, in addition to the band downshift, a weakened signal to the antibodies (Fig. 6C), most likely due to the fact that alkaline phosphatase can dephosphorylate all the residues of a target substrate, regardless of the amino acid moiety.

The fact that rapamycin has a profound effect on changing the phosphorylation of p70S6K induced by GM-CSF points strongly to a participation of mTOR in the mechanism of signaling action. To further confirm this, we made use of FK506, another macrolide immunosuppressant structurally related to rapamycin. Like rapamycin, FK506 is a ligand of the immunophilin FK506-binding protein-12 (FKBP12) but exerts its action by mechanisms different from rapamycin (31). The mechanism is mTOR-related because: (a) unlike rapamycin, FK506 did not negatively affect the status of phosphorylation of p70S6K nor did it produce any downshift (Fig. 7A), and (b) the inhibition of GM-CSF-induced p70S6K phosphorylation caused by rapamycin was rescued by pretreatment of cells with FK506 (Fig. 7B). The less phosphorylated a band moves up to restore the mobility of the hyperphosphorylated b band at 1 µM FK506. This high concentration is similar to that used by other authors in this type of experiments (17, 31). Since FK506 binds FKBP12, which is also the soluble receptor for rapamycin, a competition between the two ligands ensues. It has been established earlier that at high enough concentrations, FK506 reverts the effects induced by rapamycin (17, 31, 4345).



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7.
While FK506 does not inhibit p70S6K, it rescues rapamycin-induced inhibition. A, dose response of FK506: Thr421/Ser424 phosphorylation. Neutrophils were incubated with the indicated concentrations of FK506 for 30 min followed by a 3 min challenge with 10 nM GM-CSF. Cell lysates were generated that were used for immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. B, rescue of rapamycin inhibition by FK506: Thr421/Ser424 phosphorylation. Cells were preincubated with the indicated concentrations of FK506 for 30 min, and with rapamycin for another 30 min, followed by a final treatment with GM-CSF for 3 min. Cell lysates were generated and anti-p70S6K immunoprecipitated. Immunocomplex beads were used for immunoblotting with anti-phospho(Thr421/Ser424)p70S6K antibodies. No pretreatment represents cells that did not receive FK506 or rapamycin but were stimulated with GM-CSF.

 

MAPK Is the Other Necessary Component Involved in GM-CSF-activated p70S6K in Neutrophils—Since rapamycin could not completely dephosphorylate p70S6K, we were interested in knowing at what extent the in vitro enzymatic activity of p70S6K would be affected by rapamycin. As presented in Fig. 8, pretreatment of cells with rapamycin prior to stimulating with GM-CSF caused an inhibition of enzymatic activity with an IC50 of 0.2 nM. However, this inhibition was never complete but, instead, reached only 40–50% of the GM-CSF-induced maximal level. Higher doses of rapamycin, even as high as 50 nM, did not cause further inhibition. These results indicate that neutrophil p70S6K activity, similarly to phosphorylation, has a rapamycin-resistant component. To investigate what the regulation of this component might be, we based our next experiments on the previous observation from our laboratory that there is a cross-talk between the MAPK and the p70S6K pathway (36), as well as on other authors work (46) who have indicated that a cluster of Ser/Thr-Pro sites in the p70S6K C-terminal tail can be phosphorylated in vitro by proline-directed kinases, such as ERK1/2 or cdc2.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8.
Effect of rapamycin on GM-CSF-stimulated p70S6K activity. Neutrophils were incubated with the indicated concentrations of rapamycin for 45 min, followed by a short (3 min) incubation with 10 nM GM-CSF. Anti-p70S6K immunoprecipitates were produced and used for assaying ribosomal S6K enzymatic activity in vitro. 100% represents 2951 ± 264 dpm in the presence of GM-CSF alone.

 

We were wondering if the MEK/MAPK pathway could account for the rapamycin-resistant component of S6K activation. As presented in Fig. 9A, the MEK inhibitor PD-98059 (MEKi) also caused a partial inhibition of p70S6K activity. However, when cells were treated with a combination of PD-98059 and rapamycin prior to stimulation with GM-CSF, the loss of activity was complete, with levels returning to basal levels (note that bars on the far right and the far left are about equal). As an additional proof of the cooperative inhibitory effect of the combination rapamycin + MEKi, we measured F-actin polymerization by flow cytometry. Results in Table I show that even though the effects of rapamycin and MEKi on inhibiting actin were mild, when they were combined the levels of actin returned to basal, pre-stimulatory levels.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 9.
Full blockage of GM-CSF-stimulated p70S6K activity by a PD-98059 and rapamycin combination. A, neutrophils were incubated with the indicated concentrations of rapamycin or PD-98059 (MEKi) for 30 min followed by a 3 min challenge with 10 nM GM-CSF. Cell lysates were generated that were immunoprecipitated with anti-p70S6K antibodies and immunocomplexes were used for phosphorylation immunoblotting. Panel B shows that the combination effect is specific for MEKi and rapamycin, since FK506 and rapamycin caused an activation. Cells were preincubated with the indicated concentrations of FK506 for 30 min, and with rapamycin for another 30 min, followed by a final treatment with GM-CSF for 3 min. Cell lysates were generated and anti-p70S6K immunoprecipitated. Immunocomplex beads were used for in vitro kinase activity. 100% represents 3420 ± 659 dpm in the presence of GM-CSF alone.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE I
Flow cytometry analysis of actin polymerization in response to p70S6K modulators

Neutrophils were incubated with inhibitors for 45 minutes and then challenged with 10 nM GM-CSF at 37°C for 5 min. The stimulation was stopped by fixing the cells in formaldehyde. 200-µl samples of 1 x 104 cells were incubated with phalloidin-FITC and analyzed by flow cytometry. The log-fluorescence in each experiment was derived from Cell Quest software analysis. Results are the mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments.

 

Next, in order to show that not just any combination of rapamycin with another drug would further the inhibition of p70S6K, we tested a combination of rapamycin and FK506. As seen in Fig. 9B, this combination nor only did not improve the inhibitory effect of rapamycin but, rather, enhanced it (in vitro kinase activity of GM-CSF-treated neutrophils is not inhibited with FK506, not shown).

Finally, Fig. 10 shows that at the level of phosphorylation, a combination of rapamycin and MEKi produced a downshift in the phospho band and diminished signal to the anti-phospho antibodies. Fig. 10A shows results with phospho-Thr421/Ser424, and Fig. 10B with phospho-Thr389 very similar to that observed with the in vitro treatment with alkaline phosphatase of Fig. 6C, that produced a large removal of phosphate. It should be noted that the dephosphorylation is complete when the antibodies used were against Thr389, which lends strength to the point of the full effect of the combination rapamycin plus MEKi.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 10.
The combination of PD-98059 and rapamycin fully inhibits GM-CSF-stimulated p70S6K phosphorylation. Neutrophils were incubated with the indicated concentrations of rapamycin or PD-98059 (MEKi), or their combination, for 30 min followed by a 3 min challenge with 10 nM GM-CSF. Cell lysates were generated that were immunoprecipitated with anti-p70S6K antibodies and immunocomplexes were used for phosphorylation immunoblotting with either anti-Thr421/Ser424phospho70S6K (A) or anti-Thr389 phospho70S6K (B). Anti-p70S6K controls are also included to show equal protein loading.

 


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We report here for the first time the presence of p70S6K in neutrophils (protein, activity and phosphorylation) and its modulation by the hematopoietic growth factor GM-CSF. The data obtained in neutrophils become extremely important in view of the fact that these cells are terminally differentiated. As such, their translation machinery is not very active, yet the kinase that is supposed to be crucial in translation (ribosomal p70S6K) is present and highly activable by nanomolar concentrations of a physiological cytokine. In this study, we have also established the mechanism of p70S6K activation as involving two other cell signaling kinases. Phosphorylation of either Thr389 or Thr421/Ser424 on p70S6K is necessary but not sufficient to achieve full activation. Both have to be present during cell stimulation.

As far as we can discern, this is the first full report showing p70S6K in neutrophils and, for that matter, in a hematopoietic primary cell, its kinetic data, and its mechanism of regulation with GM-CSF. The enzyme velocity value for neutrophils (7.2 to 20.5 pmol/min/mg protein) of Fig. 2D is well in agreement with other authors who have reported kinetic data in the low picomolar range for hepatoma cells, PMA-stimulated, transfected COS-7, liver extracts of cycloheximide-stimulated rats and ion-exchange purified cell extracts, Swiss 3T3 cells stimulated with EGF and insulin and Xenopus oocytes (11, 4751). Only the enzyme purified to near homogeneity displays activity in the high nanomolar range (47, 50, 51). There are two precedents that have briefly touched upon the presence of p70S6K in either leukemic cells or mature phagocytes. In a study of the role of STAT3 in GM-CSF-induced enhancement of neutrophilic differentiation of Me2SO-treated HL-60 cells, Yamaguchi et al. (52) found that p70S6K could be activated. p70S6K is also activated upon PECAM-1/CD31 cross-linking, based on the appearance of serine phosphorylation in S6K immunoprecipitates (53). However, since p70S6K is not directly involved in integrin function (as per rapamycin evidence) the authors emphasize the upstream link, PI3K, as a common pathway of integrin and adhesiveness regulation in leukocytes.

To investigate p70S6K in neutrophils, we have concentrated in a parallel study of enzyme activity and analysis of the phosphorylation status of three key residues (Thr389 and Thr421/Ser424), working with specific anti-p70S6K immunoprecipitates. Immunoprecipitation with specific anti-p70S6K antibodies and immunocomplex assays with an also specific p70S6K peptide substrate (KKRNRTLTK, that bears the consensus site phosphorylation), accurately describes this particular kinase. Phosphorylation of 40 S ribosomal subunits (a natural substrate bearing the S6 protein) as presented in Fig. 1B also serves to fully confirm the p70S6K activity in neutrophils. To study the mechanism of p70S6K regulation elicited by GM-CSF in neutrophils, we have employed several strategies, the first one being the use of rapamycin. We have observed that this immunosuppresant does inhibit Thr389 phosphorylation as previously reported by other authors (44). These authors have established that a mutation of Thr389 to alanine (T389A) makes p70S6K rapamicyn resistant and "kinase dead," i.e. the enzyme becomes unable to be activated by cytokines or growth factors. However, an endogenous, native, kinase like the one described here in neutrophils can be partially activated by GM-CSF even in the presence of rapamycin, since other residues will be available for phosphorylation in the intact cells. Furthermore, the same authors mutated Thr389 to an acidic residue and the T389E mutant in quiescent cells had a high basal activity and was able to be activated by serum, but only to a 50% level of the wild-type construct (44). Data in Fig. 8 (present paper) seem to be in agreement with results on the T389E mutant, but not with T389A. Also regarding rapamycin in the present study, but this time as we investigated residues other than Thr389, we uncovered for the first time the unexpected effect of rapamycin on mobility shifts on Thr421/Ser424. The effect was very dramatic as it represented a change of ~3–4 kDa in the gels (Fig. 6, A and B). This correlated well with a loss of phosphate as presented in control experiments with alkaline phosphatase (Fig. 6C). The origin of this phosphate could not be established at this time but since the anti-phospho-Thr421/Ser424 antibodies still gave a positive signal, it could not be associated to Thr421/Ser424 residues but to any of the several others that have been reported to be phosphorylated upon growth factor or cytokine stimulation (3, 12, 13, 14).

Another strategy to study the mechanism of p70S6K activation, has been the use of FK506. The rapamycin-related, immunophilin, FK506 does not inhibit mTOR or p70S6K (rather, it acts through PP2A). As such, it is normally used in these type of studies as a valuable test to ascertain if an agonist effect specifically utilizes mTOR/p70S6K as a cell signaling mechanism. Our data show that FK506 does not inhibit, indicating that GM-CSF does work through mTOR/p70S6K. But the use of FK506 had an additional benefit. Since this drug binds to the FKBP12, which happens to be also the soluble receptor for rapamycin, a competition between the ligands ensue. At high enough concentrations, FK506 reverts the effects of rapamycin. Even though this has been reported earlier (17, 31) the present article is the first of its kind to have uncovered this in neutrophils, and further proves that point. Also here, the novel finding of rapamycin inhibiting only 40–50% of the enzymatic activity: the remainder is inhibited when the MEK/MAPK pathway is altered.

Since the combination of rapamycin and MEKi is necessary for full inhibition of p70S6K activity and phosphorylation, we can reasonably conclude that the two known kinases targeted by these inhibitors are needed to activate p70S6K in the first place. A model for the activation of p70S6K in human neutrophils is presented in Fig. 11. The data in this study are consistent with GM-CSF dually stimulating the activity of a Thr421/Ser424 kinase and a Thr389 kinase, resulting in full activation of neutrophil ribosomal p70S6K. Although the identity of these two kinases has not been addressed in this study, the data strongly point to a MEK-related or -activated Thr421/Ser424 kinase (possibly MAPK) and a rapamycin-sensitive, mTOR-related or -activated Thr389 kinase (possibly TOR itself). This study also indicates that both pathways must work simultaneously in order to achieve full activation of p70S6K by GM-CSF.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 11.
Model of the activation of p70S6K in human neutrophils. Incubation of human neutrophils with GM-CSF results in the dual activation of a Thr421/Ser424 kinase and a Thr389 kinase. Data presented here point to a MEK-related, Thr421/Ser424 kinase (possibly MAPK), and a rapamycin-sensitive, mTOR-related (possibly TOR itself), Thr389 kinase. Rapamycin could either inactivate the second kinase activity or activate a phosphatase. This effect is reversed by FK506. Additionally, p70S6K receives a positive input from the MEK/MAPK pathway. The latter point has also been demonstrated by Lehman and Gomez-Cambronero (36) by co-immunoprecipitation analysis.

 

The effects of rapamycin could be mediated by either blocking the activation of a Thr389 kinase or by activating a Thr389 phosphatase, or by a combination of both. Also, other residues that we have not explored in this study might be implicated. Even though it is well known (3, 4, 12, 13, 1721) that at least 12 Ser/Thr residues can be phosphorylated upon cell stimulation, there would be unpractical to examine each one of them. Importantly, Ser371 is a critical residue (13) that could explain that phosphorylation of Thr389 or Thr421/Ser424 is necessary but not sufficient to achieve full activation. Also, more experiments are needed to verify if MAPK signaling indeed only regulates S6 kinase via its C-terminal site. All and all the further unveiling of the molecular mechanism of GM-CSF-induced p70S6K activation in neutrophils deserves future investigation. A confirmation of the results presented here could come from the study of mammalian cell transfection with DNA mutants (which will be technically challenging in the neutrophil, a short-lived cell that can not be cultured) or with protein mutants. To this respect, Gardiner et al. (54) have shown that protein delivery (or transduction) to neutrophils can be successfully accomplished, as demonstrated with Rac. However tantalizing these kind of reconstitution studies may be, the lack of crucial molecular reagents (the full-length, wild-type p70S6K protein, and dominant negative or constitutively active mutants) prevent further studies on p70S6K at this time.

At any event, results shown here with neutrophils clearly indicate for the first time that we should look for effects of p70S6K other than those described for the ribosomal machinery, since the translational capabilities (the role classically assigned to p70S6K as an activator of ribosomal protein S6) of those cells are minimal. To this respect, other authors have proposed that p70S6K is involved in IL-8 production in mononuclear cells from rheumatoid arthritis synovial tissue (55). In macrophages, p70S6K has been linked with FKBP12-rapamycin-associated phosphorylation of iNOS and LPS-induced NO production and TNF-a synthesis (56, 57). A role of p70S6K in survival of cytokine-stimulated T cells or apoptosis has been ruled out (32). As an extension of the present study, we are currently exploring a possible role for p70S6K in one key physiological response of neutrophil during phagocytosis, cell migration, that is in agreement with cytoskeletal polymerization data presented in Table I.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This study has been supported by Grant HL056653 from the National Institutes of Health and 0250417N from the American Heart Association (to J. G.-C.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Physiology & Biophysics, Wright State University School of Medicine, 3640 Colonel Glenn Highway, Dayton, OH 45435. E-mail: julian.cambronero{at}wright.edu.

1 The abbreviations used are: p70S6K, ribosomal p70-S6 kinase; GM-CSF, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor; G-CSF, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; EPO, erythropoietin; IL-8, interleukin-8; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; PDK1, 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MEK, MAPK kinase; MEKi, MEK inhibitor PD-98059; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; FKBP, FK506-binding protein; FRAP, FKBP12-rapamycin-associated protein; PP2B, protein phosphatase 2B. Back

2 J. Gomez Cambronero, J. Horn, M. A. Baumann, and C. C. Paul, submitted manuscript. Back

3 J. Gomez-Cambronero, unpublished observations. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Mauricio Di Fulvio for helpful suggestions and excellent artwork, Jeff Horn for help with the phosphatase assay, and Dr. Patrick Dennis for excellent insights on the discussion



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Nemenoff, R. A., Price, D. J., Mendelsohn, M. J., Carter, E. A., and Avruch, J. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 19455–19460[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Proud, C. G. (1996) Trends Biochem. Sci. 21, 181–185[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Pullen, N., and Thomas, G. (1997) FEBS Lett. 410, 78–82[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Kawasome, H., Papst, P., Webb, S., Keller, G. M., Johnson, G. L., and Gelfand, E. W. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95
  5. Montagne, J., Stewart, M. J., Stocker, H., Hafen, E., Kozma, S. C., and Thomas, G. (1999) Science 285
  6. Shima, H., Pende, M., Chen, Y., Fumagalli, S., Thomas, G., and Kozma, S. C. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 6649–6659[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Grove, J. R., Banerjee, P., Balasubramanyam, A., Coffer, P. J., Price, D. J., Avruch, J., and Woodgett, J. R. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 5541–5550[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Reinhard, C., Fernandez, A., Lamb, N. J., and Thomas, G. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 1557–1565[Abstract]
  9. Gout, I., Minami, T., Hara, K., Tsujishita, Y., Filonenko, V., Waterfield, M. D., and Yonezawa, K. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 30061–30064[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Lee-Fruman, K. K., Kuo, C. J., Lippincott, J., Terada, N., and Blenis, J. (1999) Oncogene 18, 5108–5114[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Price, D. J., Grove, J. R., Calvo, V., Avruch, J., and Bierer, B. E. (1992) Science 257, 973–977[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Burnett, P. E., Barrow, R. K., Cohen, N. A., Snyder, S. H., and Sabatini, D. M. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 1432–1437[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Saitoh, M., Pullen, N., Brennan, P., Cantrell, D., Dennis, P. B., and Thomas, G. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 227, 20104–20112
  14. Weng, Q. P., Kozlowski, M., Belham, C., Zhang, A., Comb, M. J., and Avruch, J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 16621–16629[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Avruch, J., Belham, C., Weng, Q., Hara, K., and Yonezawa, K. (2001) Prog Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 115–154
  16. Dufner, A., and Thomas, G. (1999) Exp. Cell Res. 253, 100–109[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Han, J. W., Pearson, R. B., Dennis, P. B., and Thomas, G. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 21396–21403[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Balendran, A., Currie, R., Armstrong, C. G., Avruch, J., and Alessi, D. R. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 37400–37406[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Alessi, D. R., Kozlowski, M. T., Weng, Q. P., Morrice, N., and Avruch, J. (1998) Curr. Biol. 8, 69–81[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Pullen, N., Dennis, P. B., Andjelkovic, M., Dufner, A., Kozma, S. C., Hemmings, B. A., and Thomas, G. (1998) Science 279, 707–710[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Belham, C., Comb, M. J., and Avruch, J. (2001) Curr. Biol. 11, 1155–1167[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Isotani, S., Hara, K., Tokunaga, C., Inoue, H., Avruch, J., and Yonezawa, K. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 34493–34498[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Romanelli, A., Dreisbach, V. C., and Blenis, J. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 40281–40289[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Gonzalez-Garcia, A., Garrido, E., Hernandez, C., Alvarez, B., Jimenez, C., Cantrell, D. A., Pullen, N., and Carrera, A. C. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 1500–1508[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Calvo, V., Crews, C. M., Vik, T. A., and Bierer, B. E. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 7571–7575[Abstract]
  26. Calvo, V., Wood, M., Gjerston, C., Vik, T., and Bierer, B. E. (1994) Eur. J. Immunol. 24, 2664–2671[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Reif, K., Burgering, B. M. T., and Kantrell, A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 14426–14433[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Brown, E. J., Beal, P. A., Keith, C. T., Chen, J., Shin, T. B., and Schreiber, S. L. (1995) Nature 377, 441–446[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Kuo, C. J., Chung, J., Fiorentino, D. F., Flanagan, W. M., Blenis, J., and Crabtree, G. R. (1992) Nature 358, 70–73[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Lane, H. A., Fernandez, A., Lamb, N. J., and Thomas, G. (1993) Nature 363, 170–172[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Chung, J., Kuo, C. J., Crabtree, G. R., and Blennis, J. (1992) Cell 69, 1227–1236[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Scheid, M. P., Charlton, L., Pelech, S. L., and Duronio, V. (1996) Biochem. Cell Biol. 74, 595–600[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Gomez-Cambronero, J., and Veatch, C. (1996) Life Sci. 59, 2099–2111[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Hunter, M. G., and Avalos, B. R. (2000) Blood 95, 2132–2137[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Lehman, J. A., Paul, C. C., Baumann, M. A., and Gomez-Cambronero, J. (2001) Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 280, 183–191
  36. Lehman, J. A., and Gomez-Cambronero, J. (2002) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 293, 463–469[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. English, D., and Andersen, B. R. (1974) J. Immunol. Methods 5, 249–252[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Joseph, D. E., Paul, C. C., Baumann, M. A., and Gomez-Cambronero, J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 13088–13093[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Egger, G., Burda, A., and Glasner, A. (2001) Virchows Arch. 438, 394–397[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Zheng, X. F., Florentino, D., Chen, J., Crabtree, G. R., and Schreiber, S. L. (1995) Cell 82, 121–130[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Erbay, E., and Chen, J. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 36079–36082[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Patel, S., Lochhead, P. A., Rena, G., Fumagalli, S., Pende, M., Kozma, S. C., Thomas, G., and Sutherland, C. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 9889–9895[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Bierer, B. E., Mattila, P. S., Standaert, R. F., Herzenberg, L. A., Burakoff, S. J., Crabtree, G., and Schreiber, S. L. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 9231–9235[Abstract]
  44. Pearson, R. B., Dennis, P. B., Han, J. W., Williamson, N. A., Kozma, S. C., Wettenhall, R. E., and Thomas, G. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 5279–5287[Abstract]
  45. Dumont, F. J., Melino, M. R., Staruch, M. J., Koprak, S. L., Fischer, P. A., and Sigal, N. H. (1990) J. Immunol. 144, 1418–1424[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Mukhopadhyay, N. K., Price, D. J., Kyriakis, J. M., Pelech, S., Sanghera, J., and Avruch, J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 3325–3335[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Price, D. J., Nemenoff, R. A., and Avruch, J. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 13825–13833[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Ahn, N. G., Weiel, J. E., Chan, C. P., and Krebs, E. G. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 11487–11494[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Cicirelli, M. F., Pelech, S. L., and Krebs, E. G. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 2009–2019[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Lane, H. A., and Thomas, G. (1991) Methods Enzymol. 200, 268–291[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  51. Siegmann, M., and Thomas, G. (1987) Methods Enzymol. 146, 362–369[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  52. Yamaguchi, T., Mukasa, T., Uchida, E., Kanayasu-Toyoda, T., and Hayakawa, T. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 15575–15581[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Pellegatta, F., Chierchia, S. L., and Zocchi, M. R. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 27768–27771[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Gardiner, E. M., Pestonjamasp, K. N., Bohl, B. P., Chamberlain, C., Hahn, K. M., and Bokoch, G. M. (2002) Curr. Biol. 12, 2029–2034[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  55. Salh, B., Wagey, R., Marotta, A., Tao, J. S., and Pelech, S. (1998) J. Immunol. 161, 6947–6954[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Hayes, A. L., Smith, C., Foxwell, B. M., and Brennan, F. M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 33455–33461[Abstract/Free Full Text]