Crucial Role of TCL/TC10beta L, a Subfamily of Rho GTPase, in Adipocyte Differentiation*

Makoto NishizukaDagger §, Emi ArimotoDagger §, Tomoko TsuchiyaDagger , Tsutomu NishiharaDagger , and Masayoshi Imagawa§

From the Dagger  Laboratory of Environmental Biochemistry, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Osaka University, 1-6 Yamada-Oka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan and § Department of Molecular Biology, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya City University, 3-1 Tanabe-dori, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8603, Japan

Received for publication, November 11, 2002, and in revised form, January 23, 2003

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The events at the beginning of adipocyte differentiation are not well known. We previously cloned the genes expressed early in the differentiation of mouse 3T3-L1 preadipocyte cells. One of them, similar in sequence to human TC10, was identified as TC10-like/TC10beta Long (TCL/TC10beta L), a new Rho GTPase by the cloning of full-length cDNA. The expression of TCL/TC10beta L increased rapidly right after the addition of inducers for differentiation, whereas the levels of other Rho family genes were unchanged at this stage. The antisense TCL/TC10beta L-expressing experiment revealed that the differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells into adipocytes was inhibited. Moreover, the sense TCL/TC10beta L-expressing experiment using NIH-3T3 cells, which do not usually differentiate into adipocytes, clearly showed the accumulation of oil droplets as well as the elevated expression of various adipogenic marker genes in the presence of the ligand for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma  (PPARgamma ). These results strongly indicated that TCL/TC10beta L has a crucial role in the early stage of adipocyte differentiation, probably linked to the PPARgamma pathway. Using a subtraction protocol, the genes specifically regulated by TCL/TC10beta L were also isolated. The expression pattern of some of them was similar to TCL/TC10beta L expression in adipogenesis, suggesting that the expression of these genes would be regulated by TCL/TC10beta L.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The adipose tissue is an important organ for energy storage and lipid homeostasis (1-3). In addition, it secretes many cytokines and other proteins, such as leptin, adiponectin, adipsin, tumor necrosis factor-alpha , and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. These secreted proteins have crucial roles in regulating food intake and the insulin sensitivity/resistance in diabetes mellitus, as well as in obesity (1, 3, 4). Obesity is a ringleader for many diseases, such as diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipoidemia, and also arteriosclerosis (5). Therefore, further insight into the molecular basis of obesity is required.

Three families of transcription factor proteins have been identified and characterized as the master regulators of adipocyte differentiation (6, 7). Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma  (PPARgamma )1 is a key transcription factor for the differentiation of preadipocytes into mature adipocytes and activates the many adipocyte-specific genes including the aP2, lipoprotein lipase, and resistin genes (8, 9). The CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) family also has been identified as master regulators. Notably, C/EBPalpha activates the expression of PPARgamma , as well as leptin and the insulin receptor (7, 10, 11). The expression of C/EBPbeta and C/EBPdelta is preceded by that of C/EBPalpha and induces PPARgamma expression (6, 12). Sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1 (SREBP-1) functions as a regulator for lipid homeostasis, and this protein is also known to be an activator for the ligand production of PPARgamma (7, 13, 14). Thus, the middle and late stages of adipocyte differentiation are relatively well characterized. However, the events at the early stage of adipogenesis are not fully understood.

In previous reports, we identified 102 genes as inducible at the earliest stage of adipocyte differentiation by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) subtraction protocol (15, 16). These include genes for transcription factors and signaling proteins. It is of interest that almost half of them are unknown genes that are not found in the data bases. The main reason for this is likely to be that the isolated fragments are too short to identify the genes. Therefore, in a previous study, we performed a preliminary analysis using the rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) technique and, by partial sequencing, identified clone 26 as mouse TC10, similar in sequence to human TC10, one of the Rho family (15). However, recent findings by two groups have revealed the existence of one more Rho family member (17-19). TC10-like (TCL) was identified from human and mouse EST (expressed sequence tag) data bases sharing 95% sequence similarity with human TCL, which has 10 more amino acids in the N-terminal portion (17). TC10beta was identified as a mouse ortholog of TC10 (18). Interestingly, TC10beta has an isoform, TC10beta L, which has 10 more amino acids at the N terminus. In the present study, we isolated the full-length cDNA of clone 26 and by sequence analysis revealed that our mouse clone 26 is identical to TC10beta L (18) and also to the longer form of TCL (17). Therefore, in the present paper we refer to clone 26 as TCL/TC10beta L.

The Rho family of small GTPases makes up a large gene family, which can be divided into two groups; one group includes RhoA, -B, -C, -D, -E, and -L and Rnd1-3, and the other includes Rac1-3, Rho G, TTF/RhoH, Chp, Cdc42, TC10, and TCL/TC10beta L (20). Rho proteins act as molecular switches to control cellular processes by cycling between the active, GTP-bound and inactive, GDP-bound states. Several lines of evidence in the past few years have revealed that Rho proteins have important roles in many cellular events, such as membrane trafficking, transcriptional regulation, control of cell growth, and development (20-23). Recently, Chiang et al. (24) suggested that the activation of TC10 was essential for insulin-stimulated glucose uptake and GLUT4 translocation in fully differentiated adipocytes. However, the roles of Rho proteins have not been elucidated in terms of adipocyte differentiation.

In our previous report (15), clone 26 (TCL/TC10beta L in the present paper) was strongly expressed at the early stage of adipocyte differentiation; this induction is specific to growth-arrested cells, a state that is essential for adipocyte differentiation. These findings prompted us to further characterize the functional roles of TCL/TC10beta L. In the present study, we blocked the expression of TCL/TC10beta L using the Lac Switch mammalian expression system, which produces antisense TCL/TC10beta L. The inhibition of TCL/TC10beta L expression in 3T3-L1 cells prevented the cytoplasmic accumulation of triglyceride and decreased the expression of adipogenic related genes. We next used a retroviral system to over-express TCL/TC10beta L stably in NIH-3T3 cells. The constitutive over-expression of TCL/TC10beta L is sufficient to cause the adipocyte differentiation of these cells in the presence of 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX), dexamethasone (Dex), insulin (Ins), 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), and the PPARgamma ligand BRL49653. Furthermore, using the PCR-cDNA subtraction system, we isolated several clones as candidates for the downstream target genes of TCL/TC10beta L. Some of the isolated genes were also induced during the differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells. These results strongly suggest that TCL/TC10beta L has crucial roles in the program of adipocyte differentiation.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cloning of Mouse TCL/TC10beta L-- The full-length cDNA for clone 26 was isolated by 5'-RACE analysis. The 5'-RACE reaction was performed using the Marathon cDNA amplification kit (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The sequences were determined with the automated DNA sequencer DSQ 1000 (Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan) and ABI PRISM 310 (PerkinElmer Life Sciences).

Cell Culture and Differentiation-- The mouse 3T3-L1 (ATCC CL173) preadipocytes and mouse NIH-3T3 (clone 5611, JCRB 0615, Japanese Cancer Research Resources Bank) fibroblast cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 10% calf serum. For the differentiation experiment, the medium was changed to DMEM supplemented with 0.5 mM IBMX, 10 µg/ml Ins, 1 µM Dex, and 10% FBS at 2 days postconfluence (15). After 2 days, the cells were transferred to DMEM containing 5 µg/ml Ins and 10% FBS, and then the cells were refed every 2 days. BRL49653, the ligand for PPARgamma (a gift from GlaxoSmithKline), was also added at a final concentration of 0.5 µM. The packaging cell line PT67 (Clontech) was maintained in DMEM containing 10% FBS.

Establishment of Stable Cell Lines Expressing Antisense TCL/TC10beta L-- Stable transformants expressing antisense TCL/TC10beta L under the regulation of isopropyl-1-thio-beta -D-galactopyranoside (IPTG) were developed using a Lac Switch II inducible mammalian expression system (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The fragment containing the stretch between -11 and +241 (assigning A in start codon ATG for the first methionine from the 5'-portion as +1) was amplified by PCR using the primers with the restriction sites for SpeI and XhoI, respectively. After enzyme digestion of the amplified fragment, the resultant fragment was subcloned into a site in pOPRSVI/MCS in the antisense orientation. The sequence of the inserted fragment was confirmed as described above. 3T3-L1 cells were grown to 60-70% confluency and co-transfected with pCMVLac1, which expresses the Lac repressor protein, and pOPRSV1/MCS antisense TCL/TC10beta L or pOPRSVI without the insert using LipofectAMINE (Invitrogen). The stable transformant was selected in the presence of both 400 µg/ml neomycin (G418) and 150 µg/ml hygromycin. The drug-resistant clones were removed individually and stored.

Establishment of TCL/TC10beta L-over-expressing Cell Lines-- The TCL/TC10beta L expression vector (pDON-AI-TCL/TC10beta L) was constructed by ligating the full-length cDNA encoding mouse TCL/TC10beta L. The full-length mouse TCL/TC10beta L cDNA was amplified from 3T3-L1 cells from total RNA by RT-PCR. The PCR products were ligated into the SalI site of pDON-AI (Takara Biomedicals, Kusatsu, Japan). PT67 cells were cultured in 100-mm dishes and transfected by calcium phosphate coprecipitation with 14 µg of pDON-AI-TCL/TC10beta L plasmid. After a 48-h transfection, the viral supernatants were collected and used to infect NIH-3T3 fibroblasts at 50% confluence in 100-mm dishes. Polybrene (4 µg/ml) was added to the viral supernatants before treatment. After a 24-h incubation with viral supernatant, cells were split and replaced in DMEM containing 10% calf serum and 400 µg/ml of neomycin (G418) to select infected cells for 2 weeks. The drug-resistant clones were removed individually and stored.

RNA Isolation, RT-PCR, and Northern Blot Analyses-- The cells were harvested at a specific time. Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol (Invitrogen). The mRNA was isolated from total RNA using Oligotex-dT30 (Daiichi Pure Chemicals, Tokyo, Japan) for 5'-RACE. For RT-PCR, cDNA was prepared using AMV Reverse Transcriptase XL (Takara Biomedicals) following the manufacturer's recommended procedures. The PCR was done under the appropriate conditions. The PCR fragments were stained with ethidium bromide, and the intensities were determined with a fluoroimager (FluorImager 595, Amersham Biosciences). For Northern blot analyses, 25 µg of total RNA was electrophoresed on a 1.0% agarose gel containing 2% formaldehyde and then transferred to a Hybond-N+ nylon membrane (Amersham Biosciences). The filter was hybridized with each probe, which was labeled with [alpha -32P]dCTP using a random labeling kit (Takara Biomedicals). The radioactivity corresponding to each band was measured with a bioimage analyzer (BAS2000, Fuji Film, Tokyo, Japan).

PCR Subtraction Method-- The subtraction cloning with PCR was performed using a PCR-select cDNA subtraction kit (Clontech) as described previously (15). For this purpose, two stable cell lines, NIH-TCL/TC10beta L (a stable cell line integrated with pDON-AI-TCL/TC10beta L) and NIH-vector (a stable cell line integrated with the pDON-AI control vector) were used. These cells were harvested before and at 2 days after induction, and Poly (A)+ RNA was prepared from each cell.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cloning of Mouse TCL/TC10beta L-- We previously isolated genes expressed at the beginning of the differentiation of mouse 3T3-L1 cells (15, 16). Of these, 46 were unknown genes not found in any data bases. Clone 26 was expressed very strongly and specifically during adipocyte differentiation. This induction is not caused by just a change in medium without the differentiation mixture, because the expression of clone 26 was not observed in fresh medium without inducers (15). Moreover, when IBMX was omitted from the differentiation mixture, the induction did not occur, indicating that IBMX is a principal inducer (15). Because clone 26 is obtained as a small DNA fragment, we next attempted to isolate the full-length cDNA of this gene. Using 5'-RACE analysis, PCR products ~800 bp long were obtained, and sequence analysis showed a predicted protein that encodes 214 amino acids (data not shown).

In amino acid sequence, clone 26 showed 79.1% similarity to human TC10, which is one of the Rho family (19). As a result of a data base search, we first regarded this gene as a mouse homolog of human TC10. However, Vignal et al. (17) reported human and mouse TCL (TC10-like), a new GTPase of the Rho family related to TC10. The sequence analysis revealed 95% similarity between human and mouse, with the only major difference being found in the N-terminal portion, where human TCL is 10 amino acids longer than mouse TCL. Interestingly, the amino acid sequence of our clone 26 is the same as that of mouse TCL, except it has 10 more amino acids at the N terminus, which is exactly the same length as the human TCL sequence.

While we were preparing this manuscript, Chiang et al. (18) reported a related TC10 isoform involved in insulin-stimulated glucose transport and referred to TC10 and the new isoform as TC10alpha and TC10beta , respectively (18). TC10beta has two isoforms, and they named the longer variant TC10beta L (TC10beta Long). It was found that mouse TC10beta L is identical to our clone 26 and of the same length as human TCL and also that TC10beta is equal to mouse TCL. Therefore, we refer to our clone 26 as TCL/TC10beta L, as a longer form of TCL, throughout this study. The expression of TCL/TC10beta L was markedly elevated, whereas TC10alpha was involved in glucose transport in a late stage of adipocyte differentiation. These results indicated functional differences between TC10alpha and -beta . Therefore, we next determined the expression profiles of Rho family genes including TCL/TC10beta L and TC10alpha .

Northern Blot Analyses of TCL/TC10beta L and Other Rho Family Genes during Adipocyte Differentiation-- We investigated the expression of TCL/TC10beta L and other family members during the differentiation of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes into adipocytes. The expression levels of TCL/TC10beta L quickly elevated after the induction, reaching a peak at 3 h. The expression of TC10alpha was only slightly detectable before the induction, and it decreased after the induction. However, it increased clearly in the late stage (Fig. 1). The levels of other Rho family members, such as RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42, were unchanged throughout the incubation, indicating the specific expression of TCL/TC10beta L and TC10alpha in adipocyte differentiation.


View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Northern blot analyses of Rho family mRNAs during adipocyte differentiation. Total RNA was prepared from mouse 3T3-L1 cells at various time points after treatment with inducers. The total RNA (20 µg) was loaded, and the filter was hybridized with each probe. Staining with ethidium bromide (EtBr) for ribosomal RNA is shown as a control.

As described above, TC10beta has two isoforms that differ in the N-terminal portion. Therefore, we next performed RT-PCR analyses to determine the expression levels of these two isoforms during adipogenesis. Because the first three amino acids were the same between the short and long forms of TC10beta , we speculated that the shorter form of TC10beta is a splicing isoform and designed PCR primers for the detection of both isoforms. The PCR analyses detected that only TC10beta L, suggesting that the long form of TC10beta (TCL/TC10beta L) was specifically expressed in adipocytes (data not shown); however, we cannot rule out the possibility of sequence differences in the 5'-untranslated region due to the usage of different promoters.

Antisense TCL/TC10beta L Prevents the Differentiation of Fibroblasts into Adipocytes-- To gain insight into the biological functions of TCL/TC10beta L, we first attempted to block the expression of TCL/TC10beta L during preadipocyte differentiation using the Lac Switch mammalian expression system. We co-transfected pOPRSV1-TCL/TC10beta L antisense and pCMVLac1 into mouse 3T3-L1 cells. As a control, a cell line transfected with pCMVLac1 and pOPRSVI without the insert was also developed. By selection, using G418 and hygromycin, we isolated stable transformants, antisense TCL/TC10beta L-expressing cells and control cells. 5 mM IPTG was added to the medium 12 h before treatment with inducers for the differentiation. The level of expression of the TCL/TC10beta L mRNA was determined by RT-PCR. In TCL/TC10beta L antisense cells, the expression level of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, used as a control, did not change with or without IPTG. In contrast, the expression of TCL/TC10beta L decreased at 3 h in the presence of IPTG (Fig. 2A). In control cells, the expression levels of TCL/TC10beta L and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase were not affected by the addition of IPTG.


View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Antisense TCL/TC10beta L inhibits adipocyte differentiation. A, the expression of TCL/TC10beta L mRNA was inhibited by the addition of IPTG in stable transformants expressing antisense TCL/TC10beta L. The mouse 3T3-L1 cells, stably expressing antisense TCL/TC10beta L under the regulation of IPTG, and integrated empty vector (control) were treated with inducers. IPTG was added to the medium 12 h before the inducers at a final concentration of 5 mM. The expression levels of TCL/TC10beta L and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were determined by RT-PCR, and the relative intensities of the products are also shown. B, adipocyte conversion was inhibited by expressing antisense TCL/TC10beta L. The stable transformants expressing antisense TCL/TC10beta L and control cells were treated with inducers. IPTG was added to the medium 12 h before the inducers at a final concentration of 5 mM. After 8 days of treatment the cells were stained with Oil Red O, and the oil droplets were stained red. C, Northern blot analyses of various adipogenic marker genes. The stable transformants expressing antisense TCL/TC10beta L were treated with inducers with or without IPTG. Total RNA was isolated from cells at various time points of incubation and used for Northern blot analyses.

Using these transformants, we performed a differentiation experiment. The isolated clones were brought to confluence in 10% calf serum containing G418 and hygromycin. After 2 days incubation, the medium was changed to the differentiated medium with or without IPTG. After 8 days, the cells were stained with Oil Red O to detect oil droplets. The control cells stored the oil droplets well regardless of the presence of IPTG. On the other hand, the accumulation of oil droplets in the cells expressing antisense TCL/TC10beta L was clearly inhibited by the addition of IPTG (Fig. 2B).

To test whether the stage of adipogenesis was really blocked by the expression of antisense TCL/TC10beta L, we next determined the expression levels of the fat differentiation-linked genes. The expression of PPARgamma , SREBP-1, and C/EBPalpha , which are all known to be master regulators of adipogenesis, was inhibited to a certain extent (Fig. 2C). Lipoprotein lipase, an adipogenic marker, was also inhibited during the differentiation, whereas the expression of C/EBPbeta was decreased only slightly, and that of C/EBPdelta was unchanged (Fig. 2C).

Over-expression of TCL/TC10beta L Promotes Adipose Differentiation of NIH-3T3 Cells-- We next generated stable transformants constitutively expressing sense TCL/TC10beta L using a retrovirus system. The full-length sense TCL/TC10beta L was cloned into a retroviral vector, pDON-AI. NIH-3T3 cells were infected with viruses containing pDONAI-TCL/TC10beta L (TCL/TC10beta L) or empty vector alone (control), which were produced in PT67 cells. After selection using G418, the drug-resistant clones were isolated. The Northern blot analysis showed that the endogenous TCL/TC10beta L (~3.5 kb) was rarely detected in TCL/TC10beta L and control cells, whereas the exogenous TCL/TC10beta L derived from retrovirus was found as a ~4.6-kb long mRNA (Fig. 3A).


View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   TCL/TC10beta L promotes adipocyte differentiation in the presence of PPARgamma ligand. A, the ectopic expression of TCL/TC10beta L in NIH-3T3 stable transformants. Northern blot analyses were performed for RNAs prepared from two stable transformants: control integrated with empty vector only and TCL/TC10beta L integrated with sense TCL/TC10beta L in NIH-3T3 cells. The blots were hybridized with TCL/TC10beta L. The arrowhead and arrow indicate the endogenous expression and the exogenous expression of TCL/TC10beta L derived from integrated retrovirus, respectively. B, differentiation of TCL/TC10beta L-expressing stable transformants into adipocytes in the presence of PPARgamma ligand, BRL49653. The TCL/TC10beta L-expressing stable transformant and control (control: integrated with empty vector) stable transformant were treated with the differentiation medium containing IBMX, Dex, Ins, and FBS in the presence of BRL49653. After 10 days of treatment, the cells were stained with Oil Red O. C, Northern blot analyses of various adipogenic marker genes. The stable transformant expressing sense TCL/TC10beta L and control transformant were treated with the differentiation medium containing IBMX, Dex, Ins, and FBS in the presence of BRL49653. Total RNA isolated from cells at various time points of incubation was used for Northern blot analyses.

Then, using these established cell lines, a differentiation experiment was performed. The TCL/TC10beta L and control cells were cultured to confluence and treated with IBMX, Dex, Ins, and 10% FBS. Under the conditions, no morphological change or accumulation of oil droplets was observed after 10 days in either of the cells (data not shown). However, it is of interest that TCL/TC10beta L cells started to differentiate into adipocytes when 0.5 mM BRL49653, a PPARgamma ligand, was added to the differentiation medium. As shown in Fig. 3B, the oil droplets were detected in TCL/TC10beta L cells, whereas neither morphological change nor the accumulation of oil droplets was observed in control cells (Fig. 3B).


View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Expression patterns of genes isolated from the TCL/TC10beta L-expressing cell line. Total RNA was prepared from mouse 3T3-L1 cells at various times after treatment with inducers. The total RNA (20 µg) was loaded, and the filter was hybridized with each probe.

Northern blot analyses were performed to characterize further the phenotype of the TCL/TC10beta L cells during the incubation with inducers. Total RNAs were prepared from TCL/TC10beta L and control cells at various times after the treatment with differentiation medium containing 0.5 mM BRL49653. The expression of PPARgamma and SREBP-1, which are master transcription factors for adipogenesis, was elevated in TCL/TC10beta L cells during incubation (Fig. 3C). The expression of aP2 and lipoprotein lipase was also increased, although these increases were slight in control cells. However, the expression levels of C/EBPbeta and C/EBPdelta were unchanged in both TCL/TC10beta L and control cells. The expression of C/EBPalpha was almost undetectable throughout the incubation in both cells. These results strongly suggest that TCL/TC10beta L has important functions in the promotion of adipogenesis.

Isolation of cDNA Clones Up-Regulated in TCL/TC10beta L-over-expressing Cells-- The sense and antisense experiments indicated that TCL/TC10beta L has critical roles in the early stage of adipocyte differentiation. Because the TCL/TC10beta L gene has been reported only recently (17, 18), the functions of its product are not well understood yet, and the signaling network through TCL/TC10beta L in adipogenesis has not been characterized at all. To solve this issue, we next isolated the genes that seem to be downstream targets of TCL/TC10beta L, by subtraction between TCL/TC10beta L and control cells.

We designed two different conditions for the characterization of TCL/TC10beta L in the differentiation of adipocytes. First, we performed PCR subtraction and isolated the genes in which levels are increased by the expression of ectopic TCL/TC10beta L, without the inducers described under "Experimental Procedures" (condition 1). Second, the induced genes were cloned from cells incubated with PPARgamma ligand in addition to the inducers for 2 days (condition 2).

After performing the PCR subtraction protocol, we chose 300 colonies in each condition and sequenced them. As a result, 231 and 234 independent clones were isolated in conditions 1 and 2, respectively. It seems that 56 clones in conditions 1 and 58 clones in condition 2 are unknown genes as determined from a data base search. Next, we chose 60 and 43 clones, respectively, from known genes in each condition and performed Northern blot analyses by using total RNA prepared from TCL/TC10beta L and control cells at 0 day (condition 1) and 2 days after treatment with inducers (condition 2). Finally, we identified 21 and 13 genes, the expression of which was enhanced by TCL/TC10beta L in conditions 1 and 2, respectively. These genes are listed in Table I.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Up-regulated genes in the TCL/TC10beta L-expressing stable transformant
The PCR subtraction was performed under two different conditions as described under "Experimental Procedures." The nucleotide sequences of isolated clones were searched in the DNA data bases, and the names were shown when identical to mouse clones. When the clones showed high similarity to other species, the name of the source is given in parentheses.

As expected, the isolated genes include the ones contributing to the signal transduction and cytoskeletal and extracellular structures. Northern blot analyses were performed for some genes during the adipogenesis of 3T3-L1 cells. As shown in Fig. 4, the expression patterns of several genes were found to be similar, or slightly delayed, compared with the expression of TCL/TC10beta L.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The differentiation of adipocytes is a very complex process. The expression patterns and the functions of several transcription factors have been well characterized. Experiments using knockout mice for PPARgamma showed the requirement of this gene for the differentiation into adipocytes (25, 26). The double knockout of C/EBPbeta and C/EBPdelta impaired the synthesis of fat in mice (27). Furthermore, it is reported that the ectopic expression of C/EBPalpha promotes adipogenesis as well as PPARgamma (28). The dominant negative form of SREBP-1 prevented adipocyte differentiation (13). These findings strongly suggested that these three transcription factor families have indispensable roles in adipocyte differentiation. Thus, even though the middle and late stages of adipocyte differentiation have been relatively well characterized, the events in the early stage of adipogenesis have not been fully elucidated.

Previously we isolated many genes induced early in adipocyte differentiation (15, 16). The present paper describes the functional role of TCL/TC10beta L. The pattern of TCL/TC10beta L expression during adipocyte differentiation was specific and different from that of other Rho family members such as RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42. Interestingly, although TCL/TC10beta L shares high similarity to TC10alpha , the expression pattern of the TC10alpha gene was also different. TCL/TC10beta L was expressed at the beginning of adipogenesis, whereas the expression of TC10alpha peaked late in the differentiation. It is also reported that TC10alpha and TCL/TC10beta L differ in their impact on insulin-stimulated GLUT4 translocation (18). These results indicated that TCL/TC10beta L and TC10alpha have quite different functions in adipocyte differentiation and adipose tissue. Saltiel's group (18) also reported that there were two isoforms, TC10beta and TC10beta L. In our experiments, only the longer form, TC10beta L, was detected at the early stage of differentiation, which suggests different roles for the isoforms, although further characterization is definitely needed.

When NIH-3T3 cells expressing TCL/TC10beta L differentiated into adipocytes, the PPARgamma ligand was required. In our previous paper, we demonstrated that the regulator of G-protein signaling 2 (RGS2) promoted the differentiation in the presence of ligand for PPARgamma (29). In this case, the expression patterns of adipogenic genes were quite similar to those of TCL/TC10beta L; that is, the expression of PPARgamma , but not C/EBPs, was observed. Rosen et al. (30) recently showed that C/EBPalpha induces adipogenesis through PPARgamma and has no ability to promote adipocyte differentiation in the absence of PPARgamma , strongly indicating that the adipocytes developed through PPARgamma as a unified pathway and that PPARgamma seems to be the proximal effector of adipogenesis. It is likely that both TCL/TC10beta L and RGS2 are involved in this PPARgamma -linked signaling pathway, and this is one reason that neither gene has an effect on the expression of C/EBPs.

Sakaue et al. (31) reported the requirement of fibroblast growth factor 10 (FGF10) in the development of white adipose tissue. By experiments using anti-FGF10, and also FGF10 knockout mice and embryonic fibroblasts, they showed that FGF10 contributes to the expression of C/EBPbeta through an autocrine/paracrine mechanism. Therefore, it seems that this signaling pathway may be different from the TCL/TC10beta L and/or RGS2 pathway, although it is finally linked to a unified pathway through PPARgamma .

The functional role of PPARgamma ligand in the adipogenesis of TCL/TC10beta L-expressing NIH-3T3 cells remains to be investigated. There are at least two possibilities. One is that the endogenous PPARgamma , activated by the added ligand, enhances the functions of TCL/TC10beta L and RGS2 and also activates the PPARgamma pathway. The other possibility is that the ligand BRL49653 binds and activates different receptor proteins.

There is no direct evidence of a relationship between the signaling pathways through TCL/TC10beta L and RGS2 at this moment. Therefore, we newly isolated the genes induced to expression by TCL/TC10beta L, and found that the expression patterns of several were similar to that of TCL/TC10beta L. It is not clear that these genes are the real targets of TCL/TC10beta L signaling, because we do not have any experimental evidences as to their potential function in relation to TCL/TC10beta L. Especially, we have no information on the relationship between the Rho GTPase activity of TCL/TC10beta L and these isolated genes. However, it is of interest that Ras p21 protein activator 3 was identified as a GTPase-activating protein modulating Ras activity during normal brain development (32). A cellular nucleic acid-binding protein (Cnbp) is a zinc finger DNA-binding protein (33), and a cellular thyroid hormone-binding protein (CTHBP) is known to be involved in insulin action (34). The further characterization of these genes would help us to understand the signaling pathway at the early stage of adipocyte differentiation. The relationship between TCL/TC10beta L activity (Rho GTPase activity) and the early stage of adipocyte differentiation is also still unclear. Further studies, including experiments using constitutively active and/or dominant negative mutants of TCL, and also transient inhibition at the various time points using the RNA interference method, are definitely needed to determine whether TCL/TC10beta L has a crucial role during the early stage of adipogenesis.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. B. M. Spiegelman (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School), S. L. McKnight (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center), and R. Sato (University of Tokyo) for generously providing the plasmids containing cDNAs of PPARgamma , C/EBPs, and SREBP-1, respectively. We also thank GlaxoSmithKline for the gift of BRL49653.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by grants from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan, and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular Biology, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya City University, 3-1 Tanabe-dori, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8603, Japan. Tel. and Fax: 81-52-836-3455; E-mail: imagawa@phar.nagoya-cu.ac.jp.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 9, 2003, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M211479200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: PPARgamma , proliferator-activated receptor gamma ; TCL, TC10-like; TC10beta L, TC10beta Long; C/EBP, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein; Dex, dexamethasone; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; FBS, fetal bovine serum; Ins, insulin; IPTG, isopropyl-1-thio-beta -D-galactopyranoside; 5'-RACE, 5'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends; RGS, regulator of G protein signaling; RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase coupled-PCR; SREBP-1, sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1; IBMX, 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Spiegelman, B. M., and Flier, J. S. (1996) Cell 87, 377-389[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Spiegelman, B. M., and Flier, J. S. (2001) Cell 104, 531-543[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Steppan, C. M., Bailey, S. T., Bhat, S., Brown, E. J., Banerjee, R. R., Wright, C. M., Patel, H. R., Ahima, R. S., and Lazar, M. A. (2001) Nature 409, 307-312[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Kahn, B. B., and Flier, J. S. (2000) J. Clin. Invest. 106, 473-481[Free Full Text]
5. Kopelman, P. G. (2000) Nature 404, 635-643[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Brun, R. P., Kim, J. B., Hu, E., Altiok, S., and Spiegelman, B. M. (1996) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8, 826-832[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Rosen, E. D., Walkey, C. J., Puigserver, P., and Spiegelman, B. M. (2000) Genes Dev. 14, 1293-1307[Free Full Text]
8. Mandrup, S., and Lane, M. D. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 5367-5370[Free Full Text]
9. Tontonoz, P., Hu, E., and Spiegelman, B. M. (1994) Cell 79, 1147-1156[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Schwarz, E. J., Reginato, M. J., Shao, D., Krakow, S. L., and Lazar, M. A. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 1552-1561[Abstract]
11. Wu, Z., Rosen, E. D., Brun, R., Hauser, S., Adelmant, G., Troy, A. E., McKeon, C., Darlington, G. J., and Spiegelman, B. M. (1999) Mol. Cell 3, 151-158[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Darlington, G. J., Ross, S. E., and MacDougald, O. A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 30057-30060[Free Full Text]
13. Kim, J. B., and Spiegelman, B. M. (1996) Genes Dev. 10, 1096-1107[Abstract]
14. Fajas, L., Schoonjans, K., Gelman, L., Kim, J. B., Najib, J., Martin, G., Fruchart, J.-C., Briggs, M., Spiegelman, B. M., and Auwerx, J. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 5495-5503[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Imagawa, M., Tsuchiya, T., and Nishihara, T. (1999) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 254, 299-305[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Nishizuka, M., Tsuchiya, T., Nishihara, T., and Imagawa, M. (2002) Biochem. J. 361, 629-633[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Vignal, E., De Toledo, M., Comunale, F., Ladopoulou, A., Gauthier-Rouviere, C., Blangy, A., and Fort, P. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 36457-36464[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Chiang, S. H., Hou, J. C., Hwang, J., Pessin, J. E., and Saltiel, A. R. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 13067-13073[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Drivas, G. T., Shin, A., Coutavas, E., Rush, M. G., and D'eustachio, P. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 1793-1798[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Aspenstrom, P. (1999) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11, 95-102[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Mackey, D. J. G., and Hall, A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 20685-20688[Free Full Text]
22. Van Aelst, L., and D'Souza-Schorey, C. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 2295-2322[Free Full Text]
23. Pruitt, K., and Der, C. J. (2001) Cancer Lett. 171, 1-10[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Chiang, S. H., Baumann, C. A., Kanzaki, M., Thurmond, D. C., Watson, R. T., Neudauer, C. L., Macara, I. G., Pessin, J. E., and Saltiel, A. R. (2001) Nature 410, 944-948[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Kubota, N., Terauchi, Y., Miki, H., Tamemoto, H., Yamauchi, T., Komeda, K., Satoh, S., Nakano, R., Ishii, C., Sugiyama, T., Eto, K., Tsubamoto, Y., Okuno, A., Murakami, K., Sekihara, H., Hasegawa, G., Naito, M., Toyoshima, Y., Tanaka, S., Shiota, K., Kitamura, T., Fujita, T., Ezaki, O., Aizawa, S., Nagai, R., Tobe, K., Kimura, S., and Kadowaki, T. (1999) Mol. Cell 4, 597-609[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Rosen, E. D., Sarraf, P., Troy, A. E., Bradwin, G., Moore, K., Milstone, D. S., Spiegelman, B. M., and Mortensen, R. M. (1999) Mol. Cell 4, 611-617[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Tanaka, T., Yoshida, N., Kishimoto, T., and Akira, S. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 7432-7443[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Lin, F.-T., and Lane, M. D. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 8757-8761[Abstract]
29. Nishizuka, M., Kohei, H., Tsuchiya, T., Nishihara, T., and Imagawa, M. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 29625-29627[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Rosen, E. D., Hsu, C. H., Wang, X., Sakai, S., Freeman, M. W., Gonzalez, F. J., and Spiegelman, B. M. (2002) Genes Dev. 16, 22-26[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Sakaue, H., Konishi, M., Ogawa, W., Asaki, T., Mori, T., Yamasaki, M., Takata, M., Ueno, H., Kato, S., Kasuga, M., and Itoh, N. (2002) Genes Dev. 16, 908-912[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Baba, H., Fuss, B., Urano, J., Poullet, P., Watson, J. B., Tamanoi, F., and Macklin, W. B. (1995) J. Neurosci. Res. 15, 846-858
33. Warden, C. H., Krisans, S. K., Purcell-Huynh, D., Leete, L. M., Daluiski, A., Diep, A., Taylor, B. A., and Lusis, A. J. (1994) Genomics 24, 14-19[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Lee, Y.-H., Harada, S., Smith, R. M., Friedman, R., and Jarett, L. (1996) Biochem., Biophys. Res. Commun. 222, 839-843[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2003 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.