Glucosylceramide, a Neutral Glycosphingolipid Anticoagulant Cofactor, Enhances the Interaction of Human- and Bovine-activated Protein C with Negatively Charged Phospholipid Vesicles*

Subramanian Yegneswaran, Hiroshi Deguchi, and John H. GriffinDagger

From the Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037

Received for publication, July 8, 2002, and in revised form, December 3, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The effect of glucosylceramide (GlcCer) on activated protein C (APC)-phospholipid interactions was examined using fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Human APC, labeled with either fluorescein (Fl-APC) or dansyl (DEGR-APC) donor, bound to phosphatidylcholine/phosphatidylserine (PC/PS, 9:1 w/w) vesicles containing octadecylrhodamine (OR) acceptor with a Kd app = 16 µg/ml, whereas Fl-APC (or DEGR-APC) bound to PC/PS/GlcCer(OR) (8:1:1) vesicles with a Kd app = 3 µg/ml. This 5-fold increase in apparent affinity was not species-specific since bovine DEGR-APC also showed a similar GlcCer-dependent enhancement of binding of APC to PC/PS vesicles. From the efficiency of fluorescence resonance energy transfer, distances of closest approach of ~63 and ~64 Å were estimated between the dansyl on DEGR-APC and rhodamine in PC/PS/GlcCer(OR) and PC/PS(OR), respectively, assuming kappa 2 = 2/3. DEGR-APC bound to short chain C8-GlcCer with an apparent Kd of 460 nM. The presence of C8-GlcCer selectively enhanced the binding of C16,6-NBD-phosphatidylserine but not C16,6-7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazole (NBD)-phosphatidylcholine to coumarin-labeled APC. These data suggest that APC binds to GlcCer, that PC/PS/GlcCer vesicles like PC/PS vesicles bind to the N-terminal gamma -carboxyglutamic acid domain of APC, and that one mechanism by which GlcCer enhances the activity of APC is by increasing its affinity for membrane surfaces containing negatively charged phospholipids.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Blood coagulation has to be carefully regulated by balancing the procoagulant reactions with potent anticoagulant processes. Both procoagulant and anticoagulant reactions occur at a physiologically significant rate only when the respective enzymes form multicomponent complexes on lipid membrane surfaces (1). Thus, membranes play a pivotal role in regulating blood coagulation reactions.

The molecular details of mechanism(s) by which various lipids affect coagulation are not fully understood. Many groups have observed that lipid vesicles containing negatively charged phospholipids, especially phosphatidylserine (PS),1 bind and markedly enhance the rate of activation of procoagulant enzymes (2-9). It has been proposed that the high rate of activation of procoagulant enzymes in the presence of vesicles containing PS is due in large part to enhancement of substrate binding to the negatively charged surface of the phospholipid bilayer. The resulting high local concentration of substrate on the membrane surface can enhance diffusion of substrate to the activation complex in two dimensions rather than in three dimensions (10). Although the significance of this proposed mechanism has been controversial and alternative models have been proposed to explain many kinetic data (11, 12), current paradigms most often assume that membranes only provide a surface template for the assembly and function of the various procoagulant enzyme-containing multicomponent complexes and that the procoagulant phospholipids do not play a more active role in the blood coagulation reaction. However, it has been recently reported that submicellar concentrations of a short chain variant of phosphatidylserine, namely dicaproyl phosphatidylserine, enhances the rate of activation of both prothrombin by the prothrombinase complex and factor X by the Xase complex (13, 14). These data suggest the existence of a functionally significant binding site(s) for C6PS on one or more procoagulant plasma proteins and that the occupancy of these sites by the phospholipid molecules activates the clotting factors. If there are functionally important PS-binding sites on some procoagulant proteins, do such functionally important lipid-binding sites also exist in anticoagulant proteins?

Although both procoagulant and anticoagulant reactions are markedly enhanced by the presence of negatively charged surfaces in vitro, certain lipids and lipoproteins selectively enhance anticoagulant reactions in plasma (15-17). Recently, Deguchi and co-workers reported that plasma glucosylceramide (GlcCer) deficiency is a potential risk factor for venous thrombosis and that depletion or augmentation of GlcCer in normal plasma either reduces or enhances, respectively, the anticoagulant response to activated protein C (APC) (18). Subsequently, they reported that certain glycolipids such as GlcCer, lactosylceramide, and globotriaosylceramide, enhance the anticoagulant response of APC (19). In this study, we have examined the mechanism by which such glycolipids may enhance the anticoagulant activity of APC. To test the hypothesis that GlcCer increases the anticoagulant activity of APC by increasing its affinity for lipid surfaces where anticoagulant reactions can occur, the binding of APC to GlcCer-containing phospholipid vesicles was examined using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). Additionally, we have also examined whether there is a unique GlcCer binding site(s) on APC, the occupancy of which augments APC activity.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Reagents-- 5-Dimethylaminonaphthalene-1-sulfonyl-glutamylglycyl arginyl chloromethylketone (DEGR-CK) was purchased from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA). Na-fluorescein-p benzoyl phenylalanyl-lysyl (Ne bromoacetyl) amide (LWB) was prepared as described before (20). 7-Diethylamino-3-((4'-(iodoacetyl)amino)phenyl)-4-methylcoumarin and octadecylrhodamine (OR) were obtained from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). Bovine brain phosphatidylcholine (PC), bovine brain PS, and human spleen GlcCer were obtained from Sigma. D-Glucosyl-beta 1-1'-N-octanoyl-D-erythro-sphingosine (C8beta -D-glucosyl ceramide), N-octanoyl-D-erythro-sphingosine (C8-ceramide), 1-palmitoyl-2-[6-[7-nitro-2-1,3-benzoxadiazol-4-yl)amino]caproyl]-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (C16,6 NBD-PC), and 1-palmitoyl-2-[6-[7-nitro-2-1,3-benzoxadiazol-4-yl) amino]caproyl]-sn-glycero-3-phosphoserine (C16,6-NBD-PS) were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids Inc. (Alabaster, AL). L-3-Phosphatidylcholine-1,2-di[1-14C]oleoyl ([14C]PC) was purchased from Amersham Biosciences. The chromogenic substrate Spectrozyme PCa (American Diagnostica, Greenwich, CT), normal human plasma, factor V-deficient plasma (George King Bio-Medical Inc., Overland Park, KS), and Innovin® (Dade, Milano, Italy) were obtained.

Proteins-- Human APC was obtained from Enzyme Research Laboratories (South Bend, IN). Bovine APC was obtained as a gift from Dr. Mary J. Heeb, The Scripps Research Institute (La Jolla, CA). Factor Va (fVa) and factor Xa (fXa) were purchased from Hematologic Technologies Inc. (Essex Junction, VT).

Active Site-specific Labeling of APC-- Bovine and human APCs were active site-specific-labeled with either fluorescein (20), dansyl (21), or coumarin dyes and purified from the excess reagents according to procedures published earlier (22). For the fluorescein and coumarin labeling, Nalpha -fluorescein-p benzoyl phenylalanyl-lysyl (Nepsilon bromoacetyl) amide and 7-diethylamino-3-((4'-(iodoacetyl)amino)phenyl)-4-methylcoumarin were used, respectively, instead of the 5-iodoacetamido fluorescein.

Phospholipid Vesicles-- Multicomponent vesicles of PC/PS (9:1 w/w ratio), PC/PS/GlcCer (8:1:1), PC/GlcCer (9:1), PC/PS/galactosylceramide (GalCer) (8:1:1), PC/PS/globotetraosylceramide (PC/PS/Gb4Cer; 8:1:1), and 100% PC were prepared according to procedures described earlier (18). Briefly, pure lipids in chloroform were mixed in the appropriate ratios, and then the chloroform was evaporated under nitrogen gas to give 1 mg of solid lipid mixture in a vial. This lipid mixture was then resuspended in 1 ml of buffer containing 50 mM Tris (pH 7.4) and 150 mM NaCl. The suspension was quick-frozen in liquid nitrogen and thawed immediately in a 37 °C water bath. This freeze-thaw cycle was repeated 10 times. Finally, the suspension was transferred to an extrusion chamber (Osmonics, Livermore, CA), and vesicles were prepared by extruding the solution through a 0.22-µm filter (15 passes through the filter). A [14C]PC tracer was added to each preparation at the beginning of the procedure to facilitate determination of postextrusion phospholipid recovery. The concentration of glycolipids recovered was determined by measuring sugar head groups of the glycolipids using an orcinol-based colorimetric assay (18).

For the plane-to-plane FRET experiments, vesicles containing the acceptor dye octadecylrhodamine OR were also prepared as above except that the desired volume from a solution of OR in ethyl acetate was added to the lipid mixture prior to drying with nitrogen. The concentration of OR was determined as before as was sigma , the OR acceptor density at the vesicle surface (23).

Clotting Assays-- The procoagulant and anticoagulant properties of vesicles containing GlcCer were determined using fXa-initiated clotting assays with exogenously added human or bovine APC. For these assays, GlcCer-containing vesicles at varying doses (50 µl) were mixed with normal plasma (25 µl), human or bovine APC (34.5 nM final), or buffer (TBS containing 0.1% BSA, 30 µl) and incubated for 3 min at 37 °C. Then, fXa (50 µl, 0.3 nM final) in buffer containing 30 mM CaCl2 was added to initiate clotting, and clotting times were recorded using an Amelung KC4 microcoagulometer (Sigma). The response to APC was expressed as a ratio of clotting times that was calculated by dividing the clotting time in the presence of APC by the baseline clotting time in the absence of APC.

Modified dilute prothrombin time-based assays were also performed as previously described (17, 18). Briefly, 7.5 µl of plasma was mixed with varying concentrations of C8-GlcCer or C8-Cer and incubated for 3 min at 37 °C with fibrinogen (0.6 mg/ml final) and APC (8.7 nM final) plus protein S (28 nM final) or buffer (100 µl total). Clotting times were measured after addition of 50 µl of recombinant tissue factor (Innovin® from DADE, Miami, FL) diluted 1:64 in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% BSA and 30 mM CaCl2.

Factor Va Inactivation Assays-- To study the effect of GlcCer on APC-dependent inactivation of factor Va, APC (0.94 nM) in 50 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, and 5 mM CaCl2 was incubated for 5 min at 37 °C with factor Va (1 nM) in the presence or absence of various concentrations of PC/PS, PC/PS/GlcCer, PC/GlcCer, or PC vesicles, respectively. Then the reaction was quenched by the addition of a 2-fold molar excess of EDTA over CaCl2, an aliquot of the reaction mix was withdrawn, and the residual factor Va activity was determined using a prothrombin time-clotting assay using a fVa-deficient plasma.

Spectral Measurements-- All spectral measurements were made using a SLM AB2 or a SLM 8100 spectrofluorometer (SLM-Aminco, Rochester, NY) as described earlier (22, 23). Fluorescein, dansyl, and coumarin dye emissions were detected at excitation and emission maxima of 490, 340, and 390 nm and 525, 540, and 462 nm, respectively. All experiments were performed using 5 × 5-mm quartz cuvettes. Sample were mixed, and adsorption of proteins to cuvette walls was minimized as described (24, 25).

Plane-to-plane FRET Experiments-- The interaction of APC with various preparations of multicomponent lipid vesicles was monitored using plane-to-plane FRET between donor dyes in the active site of APC and acceptors on the membrane surface. Either fluorescein-labeled APC (Fl-APC), or dansyl-labeled APC (DEGR-APC) served as donors and rhodamine imbedded on the membrane surface served as acceptors. FRET experiments were performed as before (26) except that the D (donor-containing)- and DA (donor and acceptor)-containing cuvettes initially received 100 nM of the donor DEGR-APC (or Fl-APC), whereas cuvettes A (containing acceptor) and B (blank) received 100 nM unlabeled EGR-APC (or FPR-APC) (22). Spectral parameters including quantum yields (Phi ), spectral overlap integrals (JDA), and distance of 50% energy transfer (Ro) for these experiments are described as before (23, 22, 26-31).

The distance of closest approach (R) was calculated using the relation Equation 1
Q<SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB>/Q<SUB><UP>DA</UP></SUB>=1+(&pgr;&sfgr;R<SUB><UP>o</UP></SUB><SUP>2</SUP>/2)(R<SUB><UP>o</UP></SUB>/R)<SUP>4</SUP> (Eq. 1)
where QD/QDA is the ratio of donor quantum yields in the presence and absence of acceptor and sigma  is the density of acceptor chromophores (OR) at the membrane surface.

Point-to-point FRET-- Four samples were prepared in parallel for each energy transfer experiment: cuvette D (containing donor) and cuvette DA (containing donor and acceptor) each received 100 nM of coumarin-labeled APC (donor), whereas cuvettes A (containing acceptor) and B received 100 nM unlabeled FPR-APC. The net initial emission intensity (Fo) was obtained by the subtraction of the signal of B from D, DA, and A. Samples D and B were titrated with short chain lipids lacking the acceptor dye NBD, whereas samples DA and A were titrated with short chain lipids conjugated to the NBD acceptor. The net intensity of D, DA, or A (FD, FDA, and FA, respectively) was obtained by subtracting the signal from the B cuvette and correcting for dilution. To correct for any signal in DA sample due to direct excitation of the acceptor, the net dilution-corrected emission intensity from A was subtracted from the DA sample signal. Making the reasonable assumption that the absorption of coumarin in the active site is unaffected by the presence of NBD-labeled lipids, the ratio of donor quantum yields in D and DA samples is given by Equation 2,


Q<SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB>/Q<SUB><UP>DA</UP></SUB>=[F<SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB>/(F<SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB>)<SUB>o</SUB>]/[(F<SUB><UP>DA</UP></SUB>−F<SUB><UP>A</UP></SUB>)/(F<SUB><UP>DA</UP></SUB>−F<SUB><UP>A</UP></SUB>)<SUB>o</SUB>] (Eq. 2)
where F is the net dilution-corrected emission intensity of a sample at some point in the titration and the subscript "o" is used to donate the initial intensity of the sample.

For titrations in the presence of C8-GlcCer, 100 nM coumarin-APC was first incubated with 15 µM C8-GlcCer before point-to-point FRET experiments were performed with NBD-labeled phospholipids as described above. The distance R between coumarin donor in the active site groove of APC and NBD acceptor conjugated to the phospholipid was determined using the relation in Equation 3,
E=R<SUB>o</SUB><SUP>6</SUP>/(R<SUB>o</SUB><SUP>6</SUP>+R<SUP>6</SUP>) (Eq. 3)
where Ro is the distance at which FRET is 50% efficient and E is the efficiency of FRET given by Equation 4.
E=1−(Q<SUB><UP>DA</UP></SUB>/Q<SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB>) (Eq. 4)

Critical Micellar Concentration (CMC) Determination-- The critical micellar concentration (CMC) of C8-GlcCer in 50 mM Hepes (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, and 5 mM CaCl2 was determined using diphenyl hexatriene (DPH) fluorescence and 90 ° light scattering. DPH is an aggregation-sensitive dye and has been used to determine the CMC of lipids (13). Two samples were prepared in parallel for each experiment. The first sample (S) contained DPH (15 µM final) in 50 mM Hepes (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, and 5 mM CaCl2, whereas the second sample contained a dye-free B. DPH fluorescence was monitored at 365 nm excitation and 460 nm emission, respectively. The net initial emission intensity termed Fo was obtained by subtracting the initial intensity of B from the initial intensity S. The samples S and B were then titrated with increasing concentrations of lipids. Relative fluorescence intensity (F/Fo), calculated using Equation 5, was plotted against lipid concentration.


F/F<SUB>o</SUB>=(F<SUB><UP>S</UP></SUB>−F<SUB><UP>B</UP></SUB>)/(F<SUB><UP>S</UP></SUB>−F<SUB><UP>B</UP></SUB>)<SUB>o</SUB> (Eq. 5)
F is the net dilution-corrected emission intensity of a sample at some point in the titration and the subscript o is used to denote the initial intensity of the sample. A plot of F/Fo versus lipid concentration gave two linear slopes, and the intercept of the two linear slopes was taken as the CMC of C8-GlcCer. The CMC of C8-GlcCer in the presence of 100 nM FPR-APC was similarly determined.

The CMC of C8-GlcCer was also determined by 90 ° light scattering using a SLM AB2 spectrofluorometer (SLM-Aminco, Rochester, NY) with emission and excitation wavelengths of 320 nm. Experiments were performed with a band pass of 2 nm on both excitation and emission light paths. All buffers for light scattering were prepared dust-free by filtration using a 0.22-µm Acrodisc syringe filter units (Pall Gelman Laboratory, Ann Arbor, MI) and by centrifuging dust particles using a Microfuge before light-scattering experiments. The scatter intensity (I) of monomeric C8-GlcCer is much lower than multimeric aggregates or micelles of C8-GlcCer, and the concentration at which the scatter intensity increased sharply was taken as the CMC of GlcCer.

The CMC of C16,6-NBD phosphatidylserine and C16,6-NBD phosphatidylcholine were determined by monitoring the steady-state fluorescence anisotropy of the NBD reporter for increasing concentrations of lipid. NBD anisotropy decreases sharply upon lipid aggregation due to homo-FRET (27). NBD anisotropy was measured using Glan-Thompson prism polarizers placed on both the excitation and emission beam paths at 466 and 536 nm excitation and emission wavelengths, respectively. The emission intensity measured when the sample was excited by vertically plane-polarized light and the emission detected through a horizontal polarized light was termed IVH. IVV, IHH, and IHV were defined analogously. Anisotropy (r) was determined using the relation in Equation 6,
r=(I<SUB><UP>VV</UP></SUB>−<UP>G</UP>I<SUB><UP>VH</UP></SUB>)/(I<SUB><UP>VV</UP></SUB><UP> + 2G</UP>I<SUB><UP>VH</UP></SUB>) (Eq. 6)
where the grating factor G equals IHV/IVH.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Effect of GlcCer on the Anticoagulant Response of APC-- The effect of GlcCer on the anticoagulant response of plasma to human and bovine APC was tested using fXa-induced clotting assays (Fig. 1). Both PC/PS and PC/PS/GlcCer vesicles enhanced the anticoagulant response of both species of APC. The steeper slope for the GlcCer-containing vesicles compared with the vesicles lacking GlcCer (Fig. 1) indicates that incorporation of GlcCer into PC/PS increased the anticoagulant response of both species of APC. A GlcCer-dependent enhancement of APC activity was also observed in a tissue factor-induced dilute prothrombin-clotting assays (data not shown) showing that GlcCer serves as a lipid cofactor for both human and bovine APC.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Anticoagulant response of plasma to human and bovine APC is enhanced by GlcCer in PC/PS vesicles. PC/PS vesicles either containing (solid symbols) or lacking (open symbols) GlcCer were added to normal plasma and then assayed using fXa-1-stage clotting assays in the presence and absence of human (circles) and bovine APC (triangles). The ratio of clotting times in the presence and absence of APC are shown.

Effect of GlcCer on APC-dependent Inactivation of Factor Va-- The anticoagulant activity of APC observed in a fXa-induced clotting assay, which is due to the inactivation of fVa by APC, was studied using four different vesicle surfaces, 100% PC, PC/PS (9:1 w/w), PC/GlcCer (9:1), and PC/PS/GlcCer (8:1:1) (Fig. 2). Under the experimental conditions used, APC inactivated very little fVa on 100% PC vesicles and PC/GlcCer vesicles, whereas PC/PS and PC/PS/GlcCer vesicles supported APC-dependent inactivation of fVa. The APC-dependent inactivation of fVa was most efficient using 400 µg/ml of PC/PS/GlcCer vesicles where ~70% of fVa activity was lost in 5 min (Fig. 2). For PC/PS vesicles, 40% of fVa activity was lost under similar experimental conditions. Therefore, these data show that GlcCer enhanced APC-dependent inactivation of fVa in the presence of 10% PS.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   GlcCer incorporation into PC/PS vesicles enhances APC-dependent inactivation of factor Va. Human APC (0.94 nM final) in 50 mM Hepes (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM CaCl2, plus 0.1% BSA was incubated with factor Va (1 nM final) and PC (open circle ), PC/GlcCer (), PC/PS (black-triangle), or PC/PS/GlcCer () vesicles, respectively, at 37 °C for 5 min, and the residual factor Va activity was measured using a prothrombin time clotting assay.

Effect of GlcCer on APC-Phospholipid Binding-- To test the hypothesis that GlcCer alters interaction of human APC with membranes, the binding of human APC to lipid vesicles containing GlcCer was compared with binding to vesicles lacking GlcCer. For these experiments, FRET was used to monitor APC binding to lipid vesicles (22, 23). APC labeled in the active site with either a fluorescein (Fl-APC) or a dansyl (DEGR-APC) reporter served as a donor, whereas rhodamine dyes in OR at the aqueous-lipid interface served as the acceptor.

When human Fl-APC was titrated with PC/PS vesicles, only a very small (3%) decrease in fluorescein emission was observed (data not shown). Likewise, a very small change in fluorescein emission was also detected when Fl-APC was titrated with PC/PS/GlcCer, PC, or PC/GlcCer vesicles (data not shown). However, when Fl-APC was titrated with PC/PS (or PC/PS/GlcCer, PC, or PC/GlcCer) vesicles containing OR acceptor, the fluorescein intensity decreased until sufficient phospholipids were added to bind all of the Fl-APC (22). This OR-dependent decrease in fluorescein intensity results largely from FRET from the fluorescein dye in the active site of APC to the OR at the membrane surface (22). To facilitate data analysis, the data were normalized and expressed as a ratio of donor quantum yields in the presence (QDA) or absence (QD) of the acceptor using Equation 1. When no acceptor-containing vesicles were present, the ratio of QDA/QD was 1, whereas in the presence of these lipids, the value of QDA/QD was less than 1 due to FRET.

Fig. 3A presents data for titrations of human Fl-APC using four different vesicles containing similar OR acceptor density. The ratio of QDA/QD showed a similar dependence on lipid concentration for the PC/PS, PC, and PC/GlcCer vesicles titrations, decreasing and reaching a plateau at ~30 µg/ml vesicle concentration. However, the same plateau value was reached at a much lower lipid concentration in the PC/PS/GlcCer titration. These data suggest that PC/PS, PC, and PC/GlcCer vesicles have approximately the same affinity for human APC, whereas PC/PS/GlcCer vesicles have a greater affinity for Fl-APC. Apparent dissociation constant (Kd app) calculations based on curve fitting showed that the affinity for Fl-APC was 5-fold greater for the PC/PS/GlcCer vesicles (3 µg/ml) compared with PC/PS vesicles (16 µg/ml). Thus, the incorporation of GlcCer into PC/PS vesicles significantly increased the affinity of vesicles for APC.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   A, GlcCer incorporation into PC/PS vesicles enhances the affinity of human Fl-APC for PC/PS vesicles. Samples containing Fl-APC (100 nM initially) in 50 mM Hepes (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, and 5 mM CaCl2 were titrated with PC (triangle ), PC/PS (), PC/GlcCer (black-triangle), or PC/PS/GlcCer () in the presence or absence of OR and the ratio of quantum yields in the presence and absence of acceptor (QDA/QD) was calculated using Equation 2. At the end of the titration 200 mM dithiothreitol was added to the sample cuvette to release the Fl-labeled APC heavy chain from the membrane and reverse the FRET (data not shown). In this experiment, QDA/QD of the four titrations are plotted against the lipid concentration. The OR acceptor density for the PC, PCGlcCer, and PC/PS/GlcCer titrations was 5.2 × 10-4 dyes/Å2 and that of PC/PS titration was 5.25 × 10-4 dyes/Å2. B, GlcCer-dependent enhancement of bovine APC binding to PC/PS vesicles. Samples containing bovine DEGR-APC (100 nM initially) in 50 mM Hepes (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, and 5 mM CaCl2 were titrated with PC/PS/GlcCer (open circle ), PC/PS/Gb4Cer (), PC/PS/GalCer (black-down-triangle ), or PC/PS (triangle ) vesicles containing or in the absence of OR acceptor, and the binding monitored by FRET as described under "Experimental Procedures." The OR acceptor density in the PC/PS/GlcCer, PC/PS, PC/PS/Gb4Cer, and PC/PS/GalCer titrations were 1.78 × 10-4, 1.69 × 10-4, 1.12 × 10-4, and 1.2 × 10-4 dyes/Å2, respectively. Half maximal binding occurred at 4.5, 16, 10, and 16 µg/ml lipid for the PC/PS/GlcCer, PC/PS, PC/PS/GalCer, and PC/PS/Gb4Cer vesicles, respectively.

Although vesicles composed of only PC are inactive in our functional assays (see Fig. 2), these vesicles bound to Fl-APC with almost the same affinity as the functionally active PC/PS vesicles as reported in an earlier study (27). This discrepancy between the functional and the binding data is presumably due to the poor binding affinity of fVa, the substrate of APC, for PC vesicles leading to the functional inactivity of PC vesicles (28, 29). Incorporation of GlcCer into PC vesicles did not alter the affinity of these vesicles for APC. Thus, incorporation of GlcCer into phospholipid vesicles-detectable altered the affinity of vesicles for APC only when PS was present.

FRET between the fluorescein donor on human APC and the rhodamine acceptor on the membranes is most efficient when the APC molecule is completely membrane-bound. Although this situation can never be reached experimentally due to the dynamic equilibrium between the bound and the unbound forms, it can be approached in the presence of a large amount of lipid. At high concentrations of lipids, the maximum extents of FRET for all four titrations in Fig. 3A are approximately the same. Since the acceptor densities were similar in all four titrations, the efficiency of FRET is a direct reflection of the distance between the donor-acceptor pair, suggesting that the four vesicles bind similarly to the APC molecule, presumably to the membrane-binding Gla domain of APC.

APC Species Independence of GlcCer-dependent Effect on APC-Phospholipid Binding-- Because Fig. 1 showed that GlcCer augmented the anticoagulant activities of both human and bovine APC, the hypothesis that GlcCer similarly alters interaction of bovine APC with PS-containing vesicles was tested. When bovine DEGR-APC was titrated with PC/PS/GlcCer vesicles, the ratio of emission intensities (F/Fo) of the dansyl moiety in APC decreased and reached a plateau value of 0.79 ± 0.02 at ~12 µg/ml of lipid much like its human counterpart (data not shown). Therefore, the emission intensity of bovine DEGR-APC was sensitive to its interaction with PC/PS/GlcCer vesicles. However, the dansyl emission intensity was not altered significantly with control PC/PS vesicles. When the binding curve obtained for the interaction of bovine DEGR-APC with PC/PS/GlcCer was fit to a hyperbolic profile, a Kd app of ~6 µg/ml was obtained, a value very similar to the Kd app value for the interaction of human DEGR-APC with PC/PS/GlcCer. The binding of bovine DEGR-APC to PC/PS/GlcCer vesicles was also monitored by FRET between the dansyl donor on APC and rhodamine acceptors on PC/PS/GlcCer (OR) vesicles (Fig. 3B). At >12 µg/ml PC/PS/GlcCer (OR) vesicles, the decrease in dansyl emission of bovine DEGR-APC, like that of human DEGR-APC, reached a plateau. When bovine DEGR-APC was titrated with PC/PS (OR) vesicles, the plateau was reached at >= 35 µg/ml lipids. Therefore, these data suggest that PC/PS/GlcCer (OR) vesicles bind bovine APC and human APC with greater affinity than PC/PS vesicles indicating that the GlcCer-dependent increase in affinity of APC for PS-containing vesicles is not species-specific.

GalCer- and Gb4Cer-containing vesicles did not significantly alter the ability of APC to inactivate fVa (19). When bovine DEGR-APC was titrated with PC/PS/GalCer or PC/PS/Gb4Cer vesicles containing OR, the dansyl fluorescence decreased and reached a plateau at lipid concentrations >= 35 µg/ml much like the PC/PS vesicles. Thus, GalCer and Gb4Cer did not increase the affinity of APC for PS-containing vesicles (Fig. 3B).

These data obtained with bovine and human DEGR-APC as donor are consistent with those obtained with fluorescein as donor (i.e. human Fl-APC), indicating that the effect of GlcCer on FRET between the APC active site locus and rhodamine on the membrane is independent of the donor dye.

Specificity of GlcCer-dependent Increased Affinity of PS-containing Vesicles for APC-- To test if GlcCer-dependent increase in the affinity of negatively charged vesicles for APC is specific for APC, we compared the binding of PC/PS vesicles that contained or lacked GlcCer to DEGR-fXa. When human DEGR-fXa was titrated with PC/PS or PC/PS/GlcCer vesicles, the anisotropy of the dansyl dye in the active site of fXa increased due to fXa binding to the vesicles and reached a plateau value (Fig. 4). Approximately 50 µg/ml of PC/PS and 70 µg/ml of PC/PS/GlcCer were required to bind all the free DEGR-fXa, showing that the incorporation of GlcCer in PC/PS vesicles does not enhance the affinity of PC/PS for fXa and that the GlcCer-dependent enhancement of affinity of PC/PS for APC is specific for APC.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Binding of PC/PS/GlcCer vesicles to DEGR-fXa. DEGR-fXa (initially 200 nM) was titrated with PC/PS (open circle ) or PC/PS/GlcCer () vesicles, and the binding monitored by measuring the anisotropy (r) at 340 nm excitation and 540 nm emission. The initial anisotropy of DEGR-fXa before the addition of vesicles is designated the term ro, whereas r is the anisotropy at any point in the titration.

Membrane-bound Topography of APC Is Independent of Membrane Composition-- The magnitude of FRET observed for a given donor-acceptor pair depends upon the distance of closest approach (R) and the acceptor density (sigma ) among other things. QD/QDA values were obtained over a wide range of acceptor densities for the different vesicle compositions from different FRET (Fig. 5). Ro, the distance at which FRET is 50% efficient, is a constant for the given donor-acceptor pair and has been determined to be 48.6 Å for the dansyl-rhodamine pair, assuming a random orientation of the transition dipoles during the donor lifetime (31). The ratio of quantum yields (QD/QDA) was directly proportional to the acceptor density (sigma ) indicating that increased energy transfer was observed when more acceptor was present on the lipid surface (Fig. 5).


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   The membrane-bound topography of DEGR-APC is independent of the composition of the membrane. DEGR-APC (100 nM) in 50 mM Hepes (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, and 5 mM CaCl2 was titrated with PC/PS (, n = 13), PC/PS/GlcCer (, n = 7), PC (triangle , n = 5), or PC/GlcCer (black-triangle, n = 4) vesicles that contained different OR densities and the QD/QDA values plotted versus acceptor density (sigma ). The lines are indicative of the highest (71 Å) and the lowest (55 Å) R value determined for the different experiments.

The average values of R from all experiments for DEGR-APC of either species bound to PC/PS (90:10 w/w), PC/PS/GlcCer (80:10:10), PC, and PC/GlcCer (90:10) vesicles were calculated to be 64, 63, 63, and 62 Å, respectively. When data for human and bovine molecules were analyzed separately, the R values were 64, 63, 62, and 61 Å for human APC bound to PC/PS, PC/PS/GlcCer, PC, and PC/GlcCer, respectively, and 64, 65, 62, and 68 Å for bovine DEGR-APC bound to PC/PS, PC/PS/ GlcCer, PC, and PC/GlcCer, respectively (Table I). Therefore, there was no significant difference in the average R value for experiments using PC/PS, PC/PS/GlcCer, PC/PS/GalCer, PC, and PC/GlcCer vesicles. Thus, we conclude that the higher affinity of PC/PS/GlcCer for APC was not associated with a change in the overall topography of membrane-bound APC and that the topography of membrane-bound DEGR-APC is independent of the composition of the bound membrane under the experimental conditions used.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Summary of DEGR-APC to OR-labeled lipid FRET results

Binding of Short Chain Lipids to APC-- To address the question of whether APC has a unique binding site(s) for GlcCer, we used a short-chained analog of GlcCer, namely C8-GlcCer, which does not form micelles under the experimental conditions used (see below). When varying amounts of C8-GlcCer or C8-Cer were added to a tissue factor-induced dilute prothrombin-time clotting assay, a slight increase in clotting time was observed with increasing lipid added (Fig. 6). However, in the presence of APC/protein S, this effect was significantly enhanced (as in the case of GlcCer). Thus, C8-GlcCer was also functionally active and was used for further biophysical experiments.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Anticoagulant response of plasma to APC/protein S is enhanced by addition of C8-GlcCer. Dilute modified prothrombin clotting times are shown for various concentrations of C8-GlcCer and C8-Cer in the presence of APC/protein S (C8-GlcCer () and C8-Cer (triangle )) and in the absence of APC/protein S (C8-GlcCer (open circle ) and C8-Cer (black-triangle)).

When DEGR-APC was titrated with C8-GlcCer between 1 and 9 µM, the fluorescence emission intensity of the dansyl moiety decreased and reached a plateau value of >= 4 µM glycolipid (Fig. 7). Since fXa is structurally homologous serine protease, it was used to test the specificity of the DEGR-APC interaction with C8-GlcCer. When DEGR-fXa was titrated with C8-GlcCer, no effect on dansyl fluorescence was observed in contrast to DEGR-APC (Fig. 7), suggesting specificity of the interaction of C8-GlcCer with DEGR-APC.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   C8-GlcCer binds to DEGR-APC. Samples containing either DEGR-APC () or DEGR-fXa (100 nM initially (open circle )) in 50 mM Hepes (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, and 5 mM CaCl2 were titrated with C8-GlcCer, and the dansyl emission was monitored. Fo is initial emission intensity of DEGR-APC in the absence of C8-GlcCer, and F is the intensity at any point in the titration. Inset, determination of CMC of C8-GlcCer. The relative fluorescence intensity of DPH was measured as a function of increasing concentration of C8-GlcCer in the presence (open circle ) or absence () of 100 nM FPR-APC and gave a CMC of 40 µM.

When PC/PS (9:1) vesicles, in the presence or absence of OR, were titrated into a solution containing a mixture of DEGR-APC and C8-GlcCer, the titration profile (data not shown) resembled that of DEGR-APC with PC/PS/GlcCer (Fig. 3B). From these experiments we conclude that C8-GlcCer can effectively substitute for natural GlcCer to increase the binding affinity of DEGR-APC for PC/PS vesicles.

Physical State of Short Chain Lipids-- The CMC of C8-GlcCer at the experimental conditions used in this study were determined using DPH fluorescence and 90° light scattering. DPH is an aggregation-sensitive fluorescence probe and exhibits minimal fluorescence in aqueous solutions but displays significant fluorescence when it binds to a water-membrane interface. Therefore, this property can be used to determine the CMC of an amphipath.

When C8-GlcCer was added at room temperature to a buffer solution containing DPH a modest concentration-dependent increase in DPH fluorescence was observed below the CMC with a steeper increase above the CMC (Fig. 7, inset). Based on the inflection point (Fig. 7, inset), the CMC of C8-GlcCer under these conditions was 40 µM, a result confirmed by 90° light scattering (42 µM, data not shown). To determine whether the presence of APC in solution might nucleate micelle formation, the CMC of C8-GlcCer was also determined in the presence of 100 nM active site-inhibited FPR-APC. The presence of APC did not significantly alter the CMC of GlcCer (Fig. 7, inset).

The concentrations above which NBD labeled PC (C16,6-NBD-PC) and PS (C16,6-NBD-PS) aggregate were determined using homo-FRET measurements. Fluorophores such as NBD, which exhibit a small Stokes' shift, can efficiently undergo fluorescence self-transfer that is readily detected by the resulting depolarization of emission monitored as a decrease in anisotropy at different lipid concentrations (32). Below the CMC of the short-chained lipid, NBD anisotropy remained constant, whereas when the lipids started to aggregate NBD anisotropy decreased due to homo-FRET. At high concentrations of lipid, the anisotropy reached a constant low value, presumably due to complete energy transfer between the NBD moieties. For example, for C16,6-NBD-PS the anisotropy of the NBD moiety was constant (0.061 ± 0.002) below 480 nM of lipid (Fig. 8, inset), whereas above this concentration the anisotropy decreased sharply and the inflection point was taken as the CMC. The CMC of C16,6-NBD-PC was similarly determined. The anisotropy of C16,6-NBD-PC was a constant (0.076 ± 0.0005) below 960 nM phospholipid but decreased sharply at higher levels due to homo-FRET, and thus its CMC was 960 nM (data not shown). The CMC values for C16,6-NBD-PS (Fig. 8, inset) and C16,6-NBD-PC (data not shown) were also determined in the presence of 15 µM C8-GlcCer. Both C16,6-NBD-PS (190 nM) and C16,6-NBD-PC (320 nM) aggregated at a lower concentration in the presence of C8-GlcCer compared with the absence of C8-GlcCer.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   C8-GlcCer increases the affinity of coumarin-APC for C16,6-NBD-PS. Samples containing coumarin-APC (100 nM initially) in 50 mM Hepes (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, and 5 mM CaCl2 were titrated with 15 µM C8-GlcCer and then titrated with either C16,6-NBD-PS () or C16,6-NBD-PC (triangle ), and the binding of coumarin-labeled APC was followed by FRET as described under "Experimental Procedures." C16,6-NBD-PS (black-triangle) or C16,6-NBD-PC () titrations with coumarin-APC in the absence of C8-GlcCer are also overlaid here. Inset, determination of CMC of C16,6-NBD-PS. The anisotropy (r) of C16,6-NBD-PS was measured in the presence (open circle ) or absence () of 15 µM C8-GlcCer in 50 mM Hepes (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, and 5 mM CaCl2, giving CMC values 480 and 190 nM, respectively.

Affinity of Coumarin-APC for Phospholipids in the Presence or Absence of C8-GlcCer-- To assess if short-chained C8-GlcCer altered the binding affinities of APC for PS and PC, point-to-point FRET was performed between coumarin-APC and NBD-labeled short-chained PC or PS in the presence or absence of an excess of C8-GlcCer, where coumarin served as the FRET donor and NBD as the acceptor.

Upon addition of the acceptor-labeled phospholipids, the ratio of quantum yields (QDA/QD) of coumarin-APC decreased due to APC binding to the lipids (Fig. 8). Both C16,6-NBD-PC and C16,6-NBD-PS bound to APC, and C16,6-NBD-PS bound to coumarin-APC with a 2-fold greater affinity compared with C16,6-NBD-PC. Addition of C8-GlcCer to coumarin-APC prior to NBD-labeled phospholipids altered the titration with NBD-labeled PS but not NBD-labeled PC (Fig. 8). In the presence of C8-GlcCer, the C16,6-NBD-PS transition from soluble to aggregated lipid occurred above 190 nM phospholipid. Because the effect of C8-GlcCer on FRET between C16,6-NBD-PS and coumarin-APC FRET occurred well below this CMC of C16,6-NBD-PS, i.e. half-maximal FRET at 50 nM NBD-PS, it is likely that the coumarin to NBD FRET monitored the binding of APC to soluble phospholipids. Because C8-GlcCer itself binds to APC (Fig. 7), we conclude that C8-GlcCer bound to APC increased the affinity of APC for C16,6-NBD-PS.

FXa, an APC homolog, reportedly binds short chain PS at three different loci, namely the Gla domain, and the two epidermal growth factor domains (34). In our experiments, the efficiency of FRET between the coumarin donor tethered to the active site of APC and the NBD acceptors located on the short-chained phospholipids was very similar at high lipid concentrations for all four titrations (Fig. 8), suggesting that both short-chained phospholipids bind to approximately the same region on APC. A Ro of 39.6 Å has been reported for the coumarin-NBD donor-acceptor pair (33). Assuming that the Ro of this donor-acceptor pair does not change upon covalent attachment of donor and acceptor to protein and lipid, respectively, a distance of closest approach of ~50 Å was calculated using Equation 3 in the FRET experiments placing the phospholipid binding site(s) near the Gla domain of APC. Therefore, these FRET data suggest that C16,6 NBD-PS and C16,6-NBD-PC bind far away from the active site of APC and that the presence of C8-GlcCer prior to the titration, does not alter the location of phospholipid binding, although its presence does increase the affinity of C16,6-NBD-PS for APC.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The present study reveals that GlcCer, a neutral glycosphingolipid, enhances the anticoagulant activity of APC by increasing the affinity of APC for negatively charged phospholipid vesicles containing PS. Therefore, these direct binding studies provide a mechanistic rationale for the recently observed augmentation of APC anticoagulant activity by GlcCer and for the venous thrombosis associated with deficiency of GlcCer (18, 19). Furthermore, our data show that C8-GlcCer, a short chain fatty acid-containing analog of GlcCer, can directly bind to a site(s) on APC below the CMC and increase the affinity of APC for soluble PS but not for soluble PC. These results therefore suggest the existence of a functionally significant GlcCer-binding site(s) on APC and provide a reasonable explanation for the PS dependence of the GlcCer anticoagulant cofactor effects.

Our results are in accordance with the recently reported observations that only certain, but not all, glycolipids enhance the APC-dependent inactivation of fVa (19). For example, whereas GlcCer enhances the anticoagulant response of APC, GalCer, a diastereomer of GlcCer, does not. Thus, the GlcCer effect is stereospecific. Making the reasonable assumption that GlcCer and GalCer produce equivalent effects on membrane fluidity, these data would suggest that a direct interaction of GlcCer with APC and/or fVa and not membrane fluidity changes caused by the introduction of neutral glycolipids in a phospholipid milieu, is responsible for the enhanced lipid binding by APC.

From the FRET data for membrane-bound topography of APC (Fig. 5) we conclude that the GlcCer-containing phospholipid vesicles bind to the same end of the APC molecule as that of the vesicles lacking GlcCer. Based on the average R of 64 Å, we suggest that the Gla domain of APC harbors the specific GlcCer binding site(s) that is responsible for the enhanced phosphatidylserine binding in APC. Since GlcCer does not affect fXa-induced clotting in a fXa-1 stage assay (19) and tissue factor-induced clotting in a dilute prothrombin time assay in the absence of APC,2 a comparison of the protein C Gla domain amino acid sequence with those of fX, factor VII, and prothrombin was made, which revealed several interesting differences in amino acids. For example, the amino acid at position 23 in protein C, which is thought to play an important role in membrane-binding properties of protein C, is occupied by a negatively charged Asp or Gla residue, respectively, in human and bovine protein C, whereas this position is substituted by uncharged Ser residues in human and bovine fVII, fX, and prothrombin. Furthermore, we speculate that two other potential candidates for APC interactions with GlcCer are Gln and Asp at position 32 and 36 in protein C, respectively, which are markedly different from those in fX, prothrombin, and fVII. Residues 23, 32, and 36 in protein C may potentially interact specifically with the polar head group of the GlcCer molecule by forming suitable hydrogen bonds. The ether oxygen that connects the sugar to the ceramide moiety and the hydroxyl group on the fourth carbon of the glucopyranose have been shown to be critical for the anticoagulant activity of GlcCer since glucose, ceramide, and GalCer are not functionally active. The three aforementioned amino acid residues of protein C are in close proximity to each other in a three-dimensional computer model of the Gla domain and could very well be collectively involved in docking the GlcCer molecule in the Gla domain of APC.

GlcCer is present in plasma, mainly in lipoproteins, at a concentration of ~10 µM (18). GlcCer in cells is predominantly located on the external leaflet of cellular membrane bilayers, where it can cluster in detergent-insoluble microdomains enriched in glycosphingolipids and where these microdomains or so-called rafts can form either in caveolae or at other cell membrane loci (35-38). Based on recently reported studies (18, 19) and our results here, we hypothesize that microdomains enriched in neutral glycosphingolipids could serve as "anticoagulant microdomains" because GlcCer would promote APC binding. Moreover, such glycosphingolipid-enriched domains could also mediate other APC-dependent functions such as anti-inflammatory or anti-apoptotic activities of APC (39-42).

    FOOTNOTES

* This work is supported in part by research fellowships from the American Heart Association, Western States Affiliate, and National Institutes of Health Grants HL52246, HL21544, and M01-RR00833.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed. Dept. of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 N. Torrey Pines Rd., MEM-180, La Jolla, CA 92037. Tel.: 858-784-8220; Fax: 858-784-2243; E-mail: jgriffin@scripps.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 30, 2003, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M206746200

2 S. Yegneswaran, H. Deguchi, and J. H. Griffin, unpublished data.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: PS, phosphatidylserine; GlcCer, glucosylceramide; APC, activated protein C; FRET, fluorescence resonance energy transfer; [14C]PC, L-3-phosphatidylcholine-1,2-di[1-14C]oleoyl; PC, phosphatidylcholine; GalCer, galactosylceramide; Gb4Cer, globotetraosylceramide; BSA, bovine serum albumin; fXa, factor Xa; fVa, factor Va; DEGR-CK, (5-dimethylaminonaphthalene-1-sulfonyl-glutamylglycylarginyl chloromethylketone; DEGR-APC, APC labeled in the active site with DEGR-CK; LWB, Nalpha -fluorescein-p benzoyl phenylalanyllysyl (Nepsilon bromoacetyl) amide; Fl-APC, APC labeled with LWB in the active site via a Nalpha -[(acetylmercapto)acetyl-(D-phenylalanyl)prolylarginyl chloromethylketone inhibitor; coumarin-APC, APC labeled in the active site with 7-diethylamino-3-((4'-(iodoacetyl)amino)phenyl)-4-methylcoumarin via a Nalpha -[(acetylmercapto)acetyl-(D-phenylalanyl)prolylarginyl chloromethylketone inhibitor; OR, octadecylrhodamine; C8-GlcCer, D-glucosyl-beta 1-1'-N-octanoyl-D-erythro-sphingosine; C8-ceramide, N-octanoyl-D-erythro-sphingosine; DPH, diphenylhexatriene; NBD, 7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazole; C16, 6-NBD-PS, 1-palmitoyl-2-[6-[7-nitro-2-1,3-benzoxadiazol-4-yl) amino] caproyl]-sn-glycero-3-phosphoserine; CMC, critical micellar concentration; Gla, gamma -carboxyglutamic acid; D, donor; DA, donor and acceptor; B, blank.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Davie, E. W., Fujikawa, K., and Kisiel, W. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 10363-10370[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Lundbland, R. L., and Davie, E. W. (1964) Biochemistry 3, 1720-1725
3. Papahadjopoulus, D., and Hanahan, D. J. (1964) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 90, 436-439
4. Hemker, H. C., and Kahn, M. J. P. (1967) Nature 215, 248-251[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Nelsestuen, G. L., Kisiel, W., and DiScipio, R. G. (1978) Biochemistry 17, 2134-2138[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Nesheim, M. E., Taswell, J. B., and Mann, K. G. (1979) J. Biol. Chem. 254, 10952-10962[Abstract]
7. Stevenson, K. J., and Poller, L. (1982) Thromb. Res. 26, 341-350[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Rosing, J., Speijer, H., and Zwaal, R. F. A. (1988) Biochemistry 27, 8-11[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Pei, G., Powers, D. D., and Lentz, B. R. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 3226-3233[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Mann, K. G., Nesheim, M. E., Church, W. R., Haley, P., and Krishnaswamy, S. (1990) Blood 76, 1-16[Abstract]
11. Lu, Y., and Nelsestuen, G. L. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 8201-8209[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Lu, Y., and Nelsestuen, G. L. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 8193-8200[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Koppaka, V., Wang, J., Banerjee, M., and Lentz, B. R. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 7482-7491[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Gilbert, G. E., and Arena, A. A. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 10768-10776[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Smirnov, M. D., and Esmon, C. T. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 816-819[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Fernández, J. A., Kojima, K., Hackeng, T. M., and Griffin, J. H. (2000) Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 26, 115-123[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Griffin, J. H., Kojima, K., Banka, C. L., Curtis, L. K., and Fernández, J. A. (1999) J. Clin. Invest. 103, 219-227[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Deguchi, H., Fernández, J. A., Pabinger, I., Heit, J. A., and Griffin, J. H. (2001) Blood 97, 1907-1914[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Deguchi, H., Fernández, J. A., and Griffin, J. H. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 8861-8865[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Yegneswaran, S., Fernández, J. A., Griffin, J. H., and Dawson, P. E. (2002) Chem. Biol. 9, 485-494[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Krishnaswamy, S., Williams, E. B., and Mann, K. G. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 9684-9693[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Yegneswaran, S., Wood, G. M., Esmon, C. T., and Johnson, A. E. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 25013-25021[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Husten, E. J., Esmon, C. T., and Johnson, A. E. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 12953-12961[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Dell, V. A., Miller, D. L., and Johnson, A. E. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 1757-1763[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Ye, J., Esmon, N. L., Esmon, C. T., and Johnson, A. E. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 23016-23021[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Hackeng, T. M., Yegneswaran, S., Johnson, A. E., and Griffin, J. H. (2000) Biochem. J. 349, 757-764[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Yegneswaran, S., Wood, G. M., Esmon, C. T., and Johnson, A. E. (1996) FASEB J. 10, A663
28. Isaacs, B. S., Husten, E. J., Esmon, C. T., and Johnson, A. E. (1986) Biochemistry 25, 4958-4969[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Koppaka, V., and Lentz, B. R. (1996) Biophys. J. 70, 2930-2937[Abstract]
30. Shen, L., Shah, A. M., Dahlback, B., and Nelsestuen, G. L. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 16025-16031[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Yegneswaran, S. (1997) The Molecular Architecture of the Anticoagulant Membrane-bound Activated Protein C Enzyme and Its Dependence on the Cofactor Protein S and Phospholipid Composition.Ph.D. dissertation , Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
32. Weber, G. (1960) Biochem. J. 75, 335-345
33. van der Meer, B. W., Coker, G., III, and Chen, S.-Y. S. (1994) Resonance Energy Transfer: Theory and Data , p. 159, VCH Publishers Inc., New York, NY
34. Srivatsava, A., Wang, J., Majumder, R., Rezaie, A., Stenflo, J., Esmon, C. T., and Lentz, B. R. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 1855-1863[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Simons, K., and Ikonen, E. (1997) Nature 387, 569-572[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Brown, D. A., and London, E. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 17221-17224[Free Full Text]
37. Sprong, H., van der Sluijs, P., and van Meer, G. (2001) Nature Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2, 504-513[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Holthuis, J. C., Pomorski, T., Raggers, R. J., Sprong, H., and van Meer, G. (2001) Physiol. Rev. 81, 1689-1723[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Esmon, C. T. (2001) Crit. Care Med. 29, 48-52
40. Joyce, D. E., Gelbert, L., Ciaccia, A., DeHoff, B., and Grinnell, B. W. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 11199-11203[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Riewald, M., Petrovan, R. J., Donner, A., Mueller, B. M., and Ruf, W. (2002) Science 296, 1880-1882[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Cheng, T., Liu, D., Griffin, J. H., Fernández, J. A., Castellino, F. J., Rosen, E. D., Fukudome, K., and Zlokovic, B. V. (2003) Nat. Med. 9, 338-342[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2003 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.