A Receptor-binding Region in Escherichia coli {alpha}-Haemolysin*

Aitziber L. Cortajarena {ddagger}, Félix M. Goñi and Helena Ostolaza §

From the Unidad de Biofísica (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea) and Departamento de Bioquímica, Universidad del País Vasco, Aptdo. 644, 48080 Bilbao, Spain

Received for publication, August 21, 2002 , and in revised form, February 10, 2003.
    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Escherichia coli {alpha}-hemolysin (HlyA) is a 107-kDa protein toxin with a wide range of mammalian target cells. Previous work has shown that glycophorin is a specific receptor for HlyA in red blood cells (Cortajarena, A. L., Goñi, F. M., and Ostolaza, H. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 12513–12519). The present study was aimed at identifying the glycophorin-binding region in the toxin. Data in the literature pointed to a short amino acid sequence near the C terminus as a putative receptor-binding domain. Previous sequence analyses of several homologous toxins that belong, like HlyA, to the so-called RTX toxin family revealed a conserved region that corresponded to residues 914–936 of HlyA. We therefore prepared a deletion mutant lacking these residues (HlyA{Delta}914–936) and found that its hemolytic activity was decreased by 10,000-fold with respect to the wild type. This deletion mutant was virtually unable to bind human and horse red blood cells or to bind pure glycophorin in an affinity column. The peptide Trp914–Arg936 had no lytic activity of its own, but it could bind glycophorin reconstituted in lipid vesicles. Moreover, the peptide Trp914–Arg936 protected red blood cells from hemolysis induced by wild type HlyA. It was concluded that amino acid residues 914–936 constitute a major receptor-binding region in {alpha}-hemolysin.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
{alpha}-Hemolysin (HlyA)1 is a 107-kDa protein toxin secreted by pathogenic strains of Escherichia coli. It is a member of the so-called "RTX family," a group of proteins characterized by the presence of a Gly- and Asp-rich nonapeptide sequence repeated in tandem near the protein C terminus (for reviews, see Refs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5). These repeats constitute a Ca2+-binding domain whose structure has been solved at high resolution for a non-toxin member of the RTX family, the alkaline protease from Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6). HlyA first binds a receptor on the cell surface, a {beta}2-integrin in leukocytes (7) or glycophorin in red blood cells (8), and then becomes inserted in the cell membrane. Recent data indicate that insertion may take place in the absence of Ca2+ (9, 10), but Ca2+ binding to the nonapeptide repeat domain is essential for membrane lysis (9, 11, 12). Note that the Ca2+-binding domain is located near the protein C terminus, whereas the membrane insertion domain is located near the N terminus (9, 10, 13).

The present study is devoted to exploring the early stages of HlyA interaction with the target cell, namely its binding to the surface receptor. In particular, our investigation is aimed at the region(s) of the protein that bind(s) the receptor glycophorin on mammalian erythrocytes (8). A number of previous studies suggest that a region between the repeat domain and the C terminus may be involved in binding this specific receptor. For example, Bejerano et al. (14) have described two amino acid "blocks," located after the nonapeptide repeats, in the C terminus of the adenylate cyclase toxin (another member of the RTX family). Block A (15 amino acids) is essential for the toxic activity since it is required for the toxin binding and insertion into the membrane. Deletion of block B, however, does not affect the toxin activity. HlyA possesses homologous A and B blocks (Fig. 1), and it has been shown (14) that deletion of a region that includes the last two residues of block A, the connection between the blocks, and the first nine amino acids of block B abolishes the hemolytic activity. Previously, Chervaux and Holland (15) had shown that five point mutations in that region (residues 918, 920, 921, 928, and 932) inhibited hemolysis without affecting protein export.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
Sequence alignment of blocks A and B conserved in several toxins from the RTX family. The data were taken from Ref. 14. LktA, leukotoxin A from P. hemolytica; ApxIIIA, cytolysin from Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae; ApxIA, hemolysin from A. pleuropneumoniae; HlyA, {alpha}-hemolysin from E. coli; CyaA, adenylate cyclase from Bordetella pertussis; AktA, leukotoxin from A. actinomycetemcomitans.

 

Leukotoxin from Pasteurella hemolytica, also a RTX toxin, can be neutralized by incubation with a specific antibody whose epitope is located in the C-terminal region of leukotoxin between residues 841–872 (16). This epitope appears to be related to the binding of the toxin to the {beta}2-integrin receptor in the target cell (17). The sequence of the epitope overlaps partially blocks A and B: 841WFREADFAKEVPNYKATKDEK IEEIIGQNGER872. Another RTX toxin, leukotoxin from Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, contains an epitope, recognized by neutralizing antibodies, that begins 78 residues after the last repeat and overlaps partially with the sequence given above (18). Finally, in the adenylate cyclase toxin, deletion of the last 75 residues abolishes both the lytic and cell binding activities (19). The deleted region contains a sequence homologous to the leukotoxin epitope mentioned above.

In view of the above findings, we performed a sequence analysis on members of the RTX family, searching for peptides homologous to the 841–872 epitope of leukotoxin, with the result that this sequence was found to be highly conserved among members of the family, including HlyA (residues 914–936). A mutant HlyA lacking this peptide (HlyA {Delta}914–936) was prepared and found to be incapable of binding erythrocytes or purified glycophorin. However, the 914–936 peptide (WR peptide) did bind pure glycophorin and protected red blood cells from HlyA hemolysis. Thus, residues 914–936 of HlyA appear to be essential for the toxin to bind its erythrocyte receptor, glycophorin.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Materials—Horse red blood cells were supplied by Biomedics (Alcobendas, Spain). Human erythrocytes were obtained from a local blood bank. Glycophorin from horse or human erythrocyte ghosts was purified as described previously (8). Egg phosphatidylcholine was Grade I from Lipid Products (South Nutfield, England). Rhodamine-phosphatidylethanolamine was purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL). Hi-Trap desalting, Superdex HR-200, and N-hydroxysuccinimideactivated Hi-Trap columns were supplied by Amersham Biosciences. Oligonucleotides were synthesized by Amersham Biosciences. Taq polymerase was purchased from Bioline (London, UK). Restriction enzymes NcoI, PacI, and the T4 DNA ligase were from New England Biolabs (Hertforshire, UK). The restriction enzyme BseA1 was supplied by Roche Applied Science. WR peptide was synthesized, with >80% purity, by the Instituto de Inmunología de Colombia (Bogotá, Colombia).

Mutagenesis of HlyA—The deletion mutant, lacking residues 914–936 of HlyA, was generated using the polymerase chain reaction. In the first step, fragments upstream and downstream of the deletion were amplified, in two separate reactions, using the flanking primers and the primers A and B, which flank the region to be deleted and introduce a BseA1 new restriction site. The two fragments were then digested with BseA1 and ligated. The resulting fragment was digested with NcoI and PacI and cloned into pSU124 restricted with the same restriction enzymes. The resulting plasmid contained an inserted fragment lacking the 914–936 region and with the new restriction endonuclease site. Deletion was confirmed by DNA sequencing as follows: flanking primers, 5'-GATATCTTCCATGGCGCGG-3' and 5'-GATTTCATTAATTAATGGATTA-3'; primers ({Delta}914–936) A, 5'-ACCTGAATCCGGAGTGATTATGTTCCTGAATGTAATACCAT-3', and B, 5'-ATAATCACTCCGGATTCCCTTAA-3'. The newly introduced restriction site is printed in bold.

Protein Purification and Storage—Wild type HlyA and HlyA {Delta}914–936 were expressed in an E. coli D1210 strain containing plasmid pSU124 and purified as described by Ostolaza et al. (20) for the wild type. The proteins were stored at –20°C in 150 mM NaCl, 6 M urea, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0 buffer.

Hemolysis Assays—A standard red blood cell suspension was used, obtained by diluting the erythrocytes with saline so that 37.5 µl of the mixture in 3 ml of distilled water gave an absorbance of 0.6 at 412 nm. Equal volumes of the standard suspension of washed human or horse erythrocytes were added to serial 2-fold dilutions of hemolysin in hemolysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 10 mM CaCl2, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0) in a microtiter plate. The mixtures were incubated at room temperature for a few hours so that erythrocyte sedimentation occurred. The absorbance of the supernatants, appropriately diluted with distilled water, was measured at 412 nm. The blank (zero hemolysis) consisted of a mixture of equal volumes of buffer and erythrocytes.

Toxin Binding to Erythrocytes—Erythrocytes were washed and resuspended in hemolysis buffer at 2 x 108 cells/ml. The appropriate amounts of WT (wild type) or mutant HlyA were added, and the mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. The cells were then centrifuged at 14,000 x g, for 10 min at room temperature. The pelleted cells were lysed at 4 °C with 5 mM phosphate buffer, pH 8.0, and washed in the same buffer by centrifugation (14,000 x g, 10 min, 4 °C). The red blood cell membranes were resuspended in the same volume of 4% (w/v) SDS, 4% (w/v) glycerol, 0.02% (w/v) bromphenol blue, 100 mM 1,4-dithiothreitol, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8 and boiled for 5 min. These samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and then transferred to nitrocellulose by the method of Towbin et al. (21). Blots were blocked with 10% skim milk in TBST buffer (150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20 (w/v), 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5) for 2 h at room temperature. They were then incubated with a solution containing a polyclonal rabbit anti-hemolysin antibody (1:1,000) in 5% skim milk/TBST overnight at 4 °C, washed with TBST buffer, and finally reacted with peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit Ig antibody (Sigma) (1:2,000) in TBST buffer with 5% skim milk for 1 h at room temperature. Immunoblots were developed by a chemiluminescent method (ECL, Amersham Biosciences).

Toxin Binding to Phospholipid Vesicles—Toxin binding to large unilamellar vesicles composed of egg phosphatidylcholine was assayed by the flotation method of Pereira et al. (22). The vesicles were prepared (23) containing 0.6 mole percentage of rhodamine-phosphatidylethanolamine and diluted to 250 µM in a D2O buffer (150 mM NaCl, 10 mM CaCl2,20mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0). Liposomes were incubated with protein for 1 h at 25 °C at 1:2,500 and 1:5,000 protein:lipid molar ratios. Then liposome-bound and non-bound proteins were separated by ultracentrifugation in a TLA 120.2 Beckman rotor (627,000 x g, 2 h, 20 °C). Liposomes containing bound protein floated on top of the buffer. This upper fraction was removed, liposomes were solubilized in detergent, and lipid and protein were quantitated by fluorescence. Lipid (rhodamine-phosphatidylethanolamine) fluorescence was measured at {lambda}ex = 520 nm and {lambda}em = 590 nm. Protein (tryptophan) fluorescence was measured at {lambda}ex = 280 nm and {lambda}em = 340 nm.

Toxin Binding to Glycophorin—An N-hydroxysuccinimide-activated Hi-Trap column (1 ml) from Amersham Biosciences was used to bind purified glycophorin. The column was first washed (3 x 2 ml) with cold 1 mM HCl to remove isopropyl alcohol. Then the purified glycophorin solution (0.5 mg/ml) prepared in the coupling buffer (0.5 M NaCl, 0.2 M NaHCO3, pH 8.3) was added and left overnight at 4 °C. The deactivation of any excess active groups that had not coupled to the ligand protein and the washing out of the nonspecifically bound ligands were performed following exactly the procedure described by the supplier.

Binding of HlyA and HlyA{Delta} 914–936 was measured by adding to the affinity column 1 ml of protein (0.5 µM) in hemolysis buffer. After allowing 1 h for equilibration, the column was washed with the same buffer (4x column volume). The column was eluted first with a low pH buffer (150 mM NaCl, 0.1 M glycine, pH 3.0) and then with a high salt buffer (1 M NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0). The eluted fractions were neutralized, concentrated, and analyzed by SDS-PAGE.

WR Peptide Binding to Glycophorin in Lipid Vesicles—Large unilamellar vesicles of egg phosphatidylcholine were prepared by the extrusion method of Mayer et al. (23), using 0.1-µm pore size polycarbonate filters (Nuclepore, Pleasanton, CA). Glycophorin was reconstituted in lipid vesicles by the method of MacDonald and MacDonald (24) at a final protein:lipid mole ratio of 1:1,000, as described previously (8), except that no fluorescent probes were entrapped in the vesicles.

WR peptide binding was assayed through changes in the intrinsic fluorescence of the Trp residue in the peptide. Fluorescence emission increases when the peptide becomes membrane-bound. Peptide was added to the vesicle suspensions to a final concentration of 0.5 µM. After allowing 10 min for equilibration, fluorescence was excited at 280 nm, and emission spectra were recorded in the 300–400 nm range. Slits for excitation and emission were of 5 and 10 nm, respectively. The results are expressed as F/Fo, i.e. maximum fluorescence intensity in the presence/in the absence of protein.

Protection against HlyA-induced Hemolysis by WR Peptide—Standard red blood cell suspensions were used, prepared as indicated above (A412 = 0.60). The cells were incubated in test tubes with varying amounts of WR peptide for 30 min at room temperature with stirring, and then hemolysis was started by adding 0.023 nM HlyA. The degree of hemolysis was measured at equilibrium as described above. The percent inhibition of hemolysis by WR peptide was calculated as 100x (hemolysis in the absence of WR peptide–hemolysis in the presence of WR peptide)/(hemolysis in the absence of WR peptide).


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Sequence Alignments—Analysis of RTX toxin sequences distal to the repeat domain revealed a conserved region analogous to the 841–872 epitope of leukotoxin (Fig. 2). The alignment showed that some high homology sequences coexisted with more variable ones. This may be related to the fact that some RTX toxins (leukotoxins) attack a narrow range of target cells, whereas others (hemolysins) are less specific (3). The homologous region of HlyA, including residues 914–936, was the object of our experimental studies. It was designated as the WR peptide because of its initial and final amino acid residues.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
Sequence alignment of the conserved region between the repeat domain and the C-end of RTX toxins. HlyA, {alpha}-hemolysin from E. coli; EhxA, enterohemorrhagic hemolysin from E. coli; ApxIIIA, cytolysin from A. pleuropneumoniae; ApxIA, hemolysin from A. pleuropneumoniae; LktA, leukotoxin A from P. hemolytica; AshA, leukotoxin from Actinobacillus suis; AktA, leukotoxin from A. actinomycetemcomitans; CyaA, adenylate cyclase from B. pertussis. Colors used in the figure are as follows: blue, hydrophobic residues; red, basic residues; pink, acid residues; orange, Gly; yellow, Pro; green, polar non-charged residues.

 

The HlyA{Delta}914–936 Deletion Mutant—HlyA{Delta}914–936 was expressed in E. coli in the same amounts as the WT ({approx}2 mg/liter culture filtrate) and could be purified following the same protocol (20). It was recognized by the same polyclonal antibodies raised against WT HlyA (8). However, its lytic activity on horse or human red blood cells was of ~104 times less than the WT (Fig. 3). This is in agreement with the idea that amino acids 914–936 are involved in HlyA binding to its erythrocyte receptor. If this were the case, the hemolysis observed at very high concentrations of HlyA{Delta}914–936 might be due to secondary receptor-binding domains in the toxin, in agreement with the suggestion by Bauer and Welch (25) that several regions in the protein may be involved in cell binding. Other proposals have been made (26, 27) involving the acylated region and/or the repeat domain in cell binding. However, the results in Fig. 3 point to the WR peptide as the major structural element involved in HlyA binding to red blood cells. Note that, from the data in Fig. 3, horse erythrocytes appear to be more sensitive than human erythrocytes toward either WT or mutant HlyA. In Fig. 3, toxin concentrations producing 50% hemolysis are: horse, WT, 4.0 x 103 nM; horse, mutant, 1.1 x 102 nM; human, WT 3.0 x 102 nM; and human, mutant 4.2 x 102 nM.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
Dose-response curves of horse and human red blood cell hemolysis induced by wild type HlyA and HlyA{Delta}914–936. Erythrocyte concentration was such that A412 = 0.60. Hemolysis buffer was 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM CaCl2, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0.

 

In view of these results, HlyA{Delta}914–936 binding to erythrocytes and lipid vesicles was measured in parallel with that of the WT. The proteins were incubated at various concentrations with red blood cells. The cells were washed and lysed, and membrane proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE. WT and mutant HlyA were revealed by Western blotting with a polyclonal anti-HlyA antibody (8). Fig. 4 shows that WT HlyA, but not HlyA{Delta}914–936, could bind either horse or human erythrocyte membranes. The antibody was able to recognize the deletion mutant, as seen in lane C, bottom. The toxin concentrations used in this assay were such that they would cause, in the case of the WT, complete cell lysis. Thus, it can be concluded that the inability of the mutant to cause hemolysis (Fig. 3) is due to its abolished cell binding capacity. Deletion of amino acids 914–936 affects only the specific binding of HlyA to the cell surface receptors. Nonspecific binding (adsorption) (28) to lipid bilayers is the same as that of the WT. For an initial protein:lipid ratio of 1:5,000, the percent nonspecific binding of WT was 42 ± 5.3%, and that of the deletion mutant was 41 ± 4.3% (n = 3). For an initial protein:lipid ratio of 1:10,000, the corresponding values were 35 ± 11.6% and 31 ± 7.3%, respectively (n = 3).



View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
Binding of WT HlyA and HlyA{Delta}914–936 to horse and human erythrocytes. An immunoblot from SDS-PAGE gels containing the membrane proteins from red blood cells that had been incubated with either HlyA or HlyA{Delta}914–936 is shown. WT or mutant HlyA was visualized with an anti-HlyA antibody. In the assay with WT HlyA, the lanes show the increasing amounts of bound protein when the same amount of cells was incubated with 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, and 20 nM protein. Lane C corresponds to the control with no HlyA added. For HlyA{Delta}914–936, lane C shows a positive control of pure protein and no cells, the adjoining lane corresponds to red blood cells without added toxin, and the remaining lanes correspond to cells incubated with 1, 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 nM mutant toxin.

 

To ascertain that the lack of binding of HlyA{Delta}914–936 to erythrocytes was due to a failure in recognizing the glycophorin receptor, the binding of WT and mutant HlyA to pure glycophorin immobilized in an affinity column was tested. Experiments using glycophorin purified from either horse or human erythrocytes were performed. Either mutant or WT HlyA was passed through the column in separate experiments. The column was repeatedly washed with buffer to remove unbound HlyA. Bound HlyA was eluted with a low pH buffer. The fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, and the bands were revealed with a silver stain (Fig. 5). In the case of WT HlyA, a band of the expected molecular weight was clearly seen in the first eluate fraction (Fig. 5, top gels, lane E1), whereas no comparable band was detected in the corresponding experiment with HlyA{Delta}914–936 (Fig. 5, bottom gels, lane E1). The E1 protein band in the experiment with human glycophorin is less strong than in the case of horse glycophorin. This was consistently observed in several independent experiments and may be related to the lower sensitivity of human versus horse red blood cells toward HlyA that was observed in Fig. 3. Thus, the main conclusion from Fig. 5 is that the deletion mutant was unable to bind glycophorin, and this explains its failure to bind erythrocytes (Fig. 4) and its inability to lyse them (Fig. 3).



View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.
Binding of WT HlyA and HlyA{Delta}914–936 to horse or human pure glycophorin in an affinity column. The proteins were detected on silver-stained SDS-PAGE gels. I is a control of the corresponding WT or mutant toxin. MW and MW2 are molecular weight markers. W1 is the first washing step. E1 corresponds to the first elution step (low pH). Total protein applied to the affinity column was 50 µg in all cases.

 

The WR Peptide—The WR peptide, representing residues 914–936 of HlyA, was synthesized and used in lysis and binding assays. These experiments were designed as a complement to those performed with the proteins lacking precisely this peptide. The WR peptide had no hemolytic activity of its own, even when assayed at very high concentrations (Fig. 6).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.
Hemolysis induced by HlyA or by WR peptide. Conditions are as in described in the legend for Fig. 3.

 

To confirm that the region deleted in HlyA{Delta}914–936 participates in receptor binding, binding of the deleted WR peptide to glycophorin reconstituted in liposomes was assayed. For this purpose, phospholipid (egg phosphatidylcholine) vesicles were prepared containing glycophorin, as described in Ref. 24. A fraction of these vesicles eluting as a symmetric peak from a Sepharose 2B-300 column was analyzed for protein and lipid P and found to contain phosphatidylcholine and glycophorin at a {approx}1,000:1 mole ratio. Protein-free large unilamellar vesicles composed of pure egg phosphatidycholine were used as a control. Binding of WR peptide to reconstituted glycophorin was assessed through changes in the intrinsic Trp fluorescence of the peptide as a function of lipid concentration. Trp fluorescence increases when the peptide in solution binds the less polar membrane environment. The results in Fig. 7 demonstrate that WR peptide binds large unilamellar vesicles containing glycophorin, but does not bind to unilamellar vesicles not containing glycophorin.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7.
Binding of WR peptide to glycophorin reconstituted in large unilamellar vesicles of egg phosphatidylcholine. The change in the Trp intrinsic fluorescence of the peptide is plotted as a function of phospholipid concentration. F/Fo is the relative change in fluorescence intensity (+ vesicles/– vesicles). + G, vesicles containing reconstituted glycophorin at a 1:1,000 protein:lipid mole ratio. – G, protein-free liposomes. Peptide concentration was 0.5 µM in all cases. The data correspond to one of two independently performed experiments that gave almost identical results.

 

Protection by WR Peptide of HlyA-induced Hemolysis—In the absence of a direct proof of specific binding of WR peptide to glycophorin in erythrocytes, we have observed that pretreatment of red blood cells with the peptide decreases the extent of hemolysis induced by HlyA. The dose-dependent inhibition of hemolysis by the WR peptide is shown in Fig. 8. These data suggest that the peptide is binding the erythrocytes and subsequently preventing the specific binding of HlyA. Thus, this peptide would appear to be binding the specific receptor glycophorin.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8.
Protective effect of WR peptide against HlyA-induced hemolysis. The percent inhibition of hemolysis induced by 0.023 nM HlyA when horse erythrocytes were preincubated with varying amounts of WR peptide is shown.

 

Conclusions—From the above experiments, we conclude that the HlyA region corresponding to amino acids 914–936 is a major determinant in the specific binding of HlyA to the red blood cell surface through glycophorin. The fact that a peptide containing amino acids 914–936 provides protection against an HlyA challenge may suggest a therapeutic application of this peptide in the extraintestinal E. coli infections in which HlyA has a pathogenic role. Moreover, homologous sequences of the WR peptide exist in other RTX toxins; thus, the results in this study can probably be extended to those toxins as well.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología (Grant BMC2001-0791) and by the University of the Basque Country (Grant 13552/2001). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

{ddagger} Recipient of a fellowship from the Basque Government. Back

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 34-94-601-26-25; Fax: 34-94-601-33-60; E-mail: gbzoseth{at}lg.ehu.es.

1 The abbreviations used are: HlyA, {alpha}-haemolysin; HlyA {Delta}914–936, a deletion mutant of HlyA lacking amino acid residues 914–936; WR peptide, a peptide including amino acids Trp914–Arg936 of {alpha}-haemolysin; WT, wild type. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors are indebted to the Instituto de Inmunología de Colombia for the generous gift of the WR peptide and to Professor R. N. McElhaney (University of Alberta) for reading and improving the manuscript.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Coote, J. G. (1996) Rev. Med. Microbiol. 7, 53–62
  2. Goñi, F. M., and Ostolaza, H. (1998) Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 31, 1019–1034[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Stanley, P., Koronakis, V., and Hughes, C. (1998) Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62, 309–333[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Young, J., and Holland, I. B. (1999) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1461, 177–200[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Welch, R. A. (2001) Curr. Top. Microbiol. Inmunol. 257, 85–111
  6. Baumann, U., Wu, S., Flaherty, K., and McKay, D. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 3357–3364[Abstract]
  7. Lally, E. T., Kieba, I. R., Sato, A., Green, C. L., Rosenbloom, J., Korostoft, J., Wang, J. F., Shenker, B. L., Ortlepp, S., Robinson, M. K., and Billings, P. C. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 30463–30469[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Cortajarena, A. L., Goñi, F. M., and Ostolaza, H. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 12513–12519[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Schindel, C., Zitzer, A., Schulte, B., Gerhards, A., Stanley, P., Hughes, C., Koronakis, V., Bhakdi, S., and Palmer, M. (2001) Eur. J. Biochem. 268, 800–808[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Hyland, C., Vuillard, Hughes, C., and Koronakis, V. (2001) J. Bacteriol. 183, 5364–5370[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Ostolaza, H., Soloaga, A., and Goñi, F. M. (1995) Eur. J. Biochem. 228, 39–44[Abstract]
  12. Bakás, L., Veiga, M. P., Soloaga, A., Ostolaza, H., and Goñi, F. M. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1368, 225–234[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Soloaga, A., Veiga, M. P., García-Segura, L. M., Ostolaza, H., Brasseur, R., and Goñi, F. M. (1999) Mol. Microbiol. 31, 1013–1024[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Bejerano, M., Nisan, I., Ludwig, A., Goebel, W., and Hanski, E. (1999) Mol. Microbiol. 31, 381–392[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Chervaux, C., and Holland, I. B. (1996) J. Bacteriol. 178, 1232–1236[Abstract]
  16. Lainson, F. A., Murray, J., Davies, R. C., and Donachie, W. (1996) Microbiology (Read.) 142, 2499–2507[Abstract]
  17. Sun, Y., Clinkenbeard, K. D., Cudd, L., Clarke, C., and Clinkenbeard, P. (1999) Infect. Immun. 67, 6264–6269[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Lally, E. T., Golub, E. E., and Kieba, I. R. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 31289–31295[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Iwaki, M., Ullmann, A., and Sebo, P. (1995) Mol. Microbiol. 17, 1015–1024[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Ostolaza, H., Bartolomé, B., Serra, J. L., de la Cruz, F., and Goñi, F. M. (1991) FEBS Lett. 280, 195–198[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Towbin, H., Staehlin, T., and Gordon, J. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 76, 4350–4359[Abstract]
  22. Pereira, F. B., Goñi, F. M., and Nieva, J. L. (1995) FEBS Lett. 362, 243–246[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Mayer, L. D., Hope, M. J., and Cullis, P. R. (1986) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 858, 161–168[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. MacDonald, R. I., and MacDonald, R. C. (1975) J. Biol. Chem. 250, 9206–9214
  25. Bauer, M. E., and Welch R. A. (1996) Infect. Immun. 64, 4665–4672[Abstract]
  26. Lim, K. B., Bazemore, C. R., Guo, L., Pellett, S., Shabanowitz, J., Hunt, D., Hewlett, E., Ludwig, A., Goebel, W., Welch, R. A., and Hackett, M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 36698–36702[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Cruz, W. T., Young, R., Chang, Y. F., and Struck, D. K. (1990) Mol. Microbiol. 4, 1933–1939[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Bakás, L., Ostolaza, H., Vaz, W. L. C., and Goñi, F. M. (1996) Biophys. J. 71, 1869–1879[Abstract]