Manganese Specificity Determinants in the Arabidopsis Metal/H+ Antiporter CAX2*

Toshiro ShigakiDagger §, Jon K. PittmanDagger §, and Kendal D. HirschiDagger ||**

From the Dagger  United States Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service Children's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, the  Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, and || Vegetable and Fruit Improvement Center, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77845

Received for publication, September 27, 2002, and in revised form, December 12, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In plants and fungi, vacuolar transporters help remove potentially toxic cations from the cytosol. Metal/H+ antiporters are involved in metal sequestration into the vacuole. However, the specific transport properties and the ability to manipulate these transporters to alter substrate specificity are poorly understood. The Arabidopsis thaliana cation exchangers, CAX1 and CAX2, can both transport Ca2+ into the vacuole. There are 11 CAX-like transporters in Arabidopsis; however, CAX2 was the only characterized CAX transporter capable of vacuolar Mn2+ transport when expressed in yeast. To determine the domains within CAX2 that mediate Mn2+ specificity, six CAX2 mutants were constructed that contained different regions of the CAX1 transporter. One class displayed no alterations in Mn2+ or Ca2+ transport, the second class showed a reduction in Ca2+ transport and no measurable Mn2+ transport, and the third mutant, which contained a 10-amino acid domain from CAX1 (CAX2-C), showed no reduction in Ca2+ transport and a complete loss of Mn2+ transport. The subdomain analysis of CAX2-C identified a 3-amino acid region that is responsible for Mn2+ specificity of CAX2. This study provides evidence for the feasibility of altering substrate specificity in a metal/H+ antiporter, an important family of transporters found in a variety of organisms.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The differential partitioning of cations is crucial for life processes, and transporters play a critical role in maintaining the proper concentrations of these ions in various cellular compartments (1). The inability of plants to actively avoid toxic concentrations of particular cations in the environment places a particular importance on cation transporters. One mechanism employed by plants and fungi to avoid cation toxicity is the sequestration of cations into large vacuoles (2). A fundamental question that arises is whether there are separate vacuolar transporters for each cation, and if not, what is the metal specificity of a given transporter?

Several types of active transport mechanisms exist in plants to drive cations out of the cytosol against a steep concentration gradient (3, 4). One important class of transporters is the H+-coupled cation antiporters, which have been identified at the vacuolar (tonoplast) membrane and are driven by a proton electrochemical gradient (5-8). These transporters have numerous functions including resetting cytosolic levels of Ca2+ post signaling, vacuolar sequestration of potentially toxic concentrations of Cd2+, Zn2+, Mn2+ and other metals, and vacuolar storage of essential micronutrients such as Zn2+, Mg2+, and Mn2+. Despite numerous descriptive reports in whole plants (6, 9, 10) and the recent cloning of several of these transporters (11-13), there is a dearth of information available regarding H+-coupled ion selectivity, and much less for the residues that define specific cation transport (14).

Two Arabidopsis cation exchanger (CAX)1 genes, CAX1 and CAX2, were identified that could suppress mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae defective in vacuolar Ca2+ transport (11). Experiments using vacuolar membranes from yeast cells expressing CAX1 (11) demonstrate that this protein has biochemical properties similar to those of native plant vacuolar H+/Ca2+ exchangers (5, 15). In similar experiments in yeast, CAX2 appears to have a higher Km for Ca2+ than CAX1 and a lower capacity for Ca2+ transport (11). CAX2 localizes to the plant vacuole, and when expressed at high levels in transgenic plants, increases vacuolar metal transport and causes the plants to accumulate more Ca2+, Mn2+ and Cd2+ (16). Furthermore these transgenic plants were more tolerant to Mn2+ in the growth media. These transport properties of CAX2 suggest the potential for broad substrate specificity among the 11 CAX-like transporters found in the Arabidopsis genome (17).

Two domains have been described that modulate CAX1 activity (14, 18, 19). The first domain has been termed the Ca2+ domain (CaD), located between amino acids 87 and 95 in CAX1 (14). This domain appears to be necessary for Ca2+ transport by CAX1. Exchanging this 9-amino acid region of CAX1 into CAX2 (giving the construct CAX2-9) greatly increases its Ca2+ transport activity but does not appear to alter transport of other metals (14). The second domain that regulates CAX function has been termed the regulatory or autoinhibitory domain (18, 19). Sequence analysis suggests that an N-terminal regulatory domain may be present in all plant CAX-like transporters (20). The CAX1 and CAX2 open reading frames contain additional amino acids at the N terminus that were not found in the original "shorter" N-terminally truncated CAX (sCAX) clones (sCAX1 and sCAX2) identified by suppression of yeast vacuolar Ca2+ transport mutants (20, 21). These findings suggest structural features involved in regulation and Ca2+ transport but do not identify domains that may confer metal specificity among these CAX transporters. The manipulation of CAX transporters, through alteration in expression and substrate specificity, is an essential component in developing plants with increased tolerance to metals or removing toxic levels of metals from soil (phytoremediation) (22). For a successful phytoremediation strategy, it is important to understand what determines the specificity of broad range metal transporters such as CAX2.

In this report, we have characterized the transport properties of the CAX2 transporter. We identify specific domains within CAX2 that mediate Mn2+ substrate specificity and alter these domains to abolish the Mn2+ transport capabilities of CAX2, thus increasing its metal specificity. These findings serve as a framework for engineering metal specificity among the various H+/cation exchangers found in bacteria, fungi, and plants.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Yeast Strains, Vectors, and DNA Manipulations-- K667 (cnb1::LEU2 pmc1::TRP1 vcx1Delta (23)) was the S. cerevisiae strain used to express wild type and mutant genes. The wild type or mutant genes were propagated in pBluescript II SK(+) (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), and inserts were transferred to the shuttle vector piHGpd (24) for the expression in the yeast. The plasmids were introduced into yeast by the lithium acetate/single-stranded DNA/polyethylene glycol transformation method (25). Standard techniques were used to manipulate the DNA used in this study (26). All of the CAX1 and CAX2 clones used in this study were identical to the N-terminally truncated clones originally identified (11). Thus the proteins encoded by sCAX1 and sCAX2 lacked the first 36 and 42 amino acids, respectively.

Site-directed Mutagenesis-- Site-directed mutagenesis was performed by a Class IIS restriction enzyme-mediated method (27), using sCAX2 in pBluescript as the template DNA. BsmBI was the Class IIS restriction enzyme used throughout this study. CAX2-9 was constructed previously (14). The primers used were as follows: for CAX2-A, 5'-GAA TTC CGT CTC CTA ATA ATC TCC AAG AAG TCA TTC TCG GGA CAA AAC TCA ATC TAC TAC TAC CTT TC-3' (forward), 5'-GAA TTC CGT CTC CAT TAA GTA CGC TGT TCT TTG G-3' (reverse); for CAX2-B, 5'-GAA TTC CGT CTC CTT TGA CCA ATA ACA AAG TGG CAG TGG TCA AAT ATT CGT TAC TAG GCT CAA TTC TGT C-3' (forward), 5'-GAA TTC CGT CTC CCA AAG CGA AAA TTG ATA TGA TC-3' (reverse); for CAX2-C, 5'-GAA TTC CGT CTC CTG GCA CTT CAC TCT TCT GTG GAG GAA TCG CGA ATT ACC AAA AAG ACC AAG TCT TTG-3' (forward), 5'-GAA TTC CGT CTC CGC CAA GTA CAA GTA ACA TGT TAG AC-3' (reverse); for CAX2-D, 5'-GAA TTC CGT CTC CCT ACT TGA AAA ACG GAG AGG CTT CGG CTG CTG TTT TGT CCG ACA TGC AAC TAG CCC TGT CAA GGT TCA G-3' (forward), 5'-GAA TTC CGT CTC CGT AGT GAA GAA CAG CCG GGA AGA G-3' (reverse); for CAX2-E, 5'-GAA TTC CGT CTC CGT TAT GGA CTC ACC GTC AAT TGT TCG ATG CAC TCG ATG AGG AAT CAA ATC AGA AC-3' (forward), 5'-GAA TTC CGT CTC CTA ACT GGA AGA AGA GGT AAG-3' (reverse); for CAX2-C1, 5'-GAA TTC CGT CTC CTG GCA CTT CAC TCT TTT GTG GTG GAC TAG TCT TTT ACC-3' (forward; the reverse primer was the same as CAX2-C reverse); for CAX2-C2, 5'-GAA TTC CGT CTC CTG GCA TCG CGA ATT ACC AAA AAG ACC AAG TCT TTG-3' (forward), 5'-GAA TTC CGT CTC CGC CAC CAC AAA AGA AGG CGC AG-3' (reverse). The bold letters in the primer sequences indicate introduced mutations. All constructs were sequenced completely and then subcloned into the yeast expression vector piHGpd.

Construction of C-terminal C-Myc-tagged Fusions-- CAX1-c-Myc was constructed in a previous study (20). Five tandem copies of the c-Myc epitope (EQKLISEEDL) were used to produce in-frame fusions of c-Myc to the C-terminal end of CAX2 constructs. The c-myc sequence was amplified by PCR from plasmid pT7-5Xmyc using the primers 5'-GAA TTC GGA TCC GGT CGA CGG TAT CG-3' (forward) and 5'-GAA TTC GAG CTC TTA TCC ACC AAC CCG GGG TAC CGA ATT C-3' (reverse). A BamHI site (underlined) was included in the forward primer to ligate the tag to the engineered BamHI site at the 3'-end of the CAX2 constructs.

Protein Isolation and Expression Analysis of C-Myc-tagged Constructs-- Total protein was isolated from yeast expressing c-Myc-tagged constructs using the glass bead method (26). Protein concentration was determined by using a protein assay kit (Bio-Rad). The protein was separated by SDS-PAGE and detected by anti-c-Myc monoclonal antibody (Berkeley Antibody Co., Richmond, CA) as described (20).

Assay for Yeast Suppression-- The assay for Ca2+ tolerance on solid agar media was performed as previously described (11). K667 cultures expressing various constructs were grown in a selective liquid medium for 16 h, and 4 µl were spotted onto yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) agar media containing appropriate concentrations of CaCl2 or MnCl2. The cultures were then allowed to grow for 48 h at 30 °C.

Preparation of Membrane Vesicles for Ca2+ Transport Assays-- Yeast membrane microsomes were prepared as described previously (28).

Measurement of 45Ca2+ and 54Mn2+ Uptake-- For the measurement of Ca2+ and Mn2+ uptake, membrane vesicles (30-40 µg/ml) were incubated in buffer containing 0.3 M sorbitol, 5 mM Tris-MES (pH 7.6), 25 mM KCl, 0.1 mM sodium azide, and 0.2 mM sodium orthovanadate. Vacuolar H+-translocating ATPase-catalyzed H+ translocation was initiated by the addition of 1 mM MgSO4 and 1 mM ATP. The vesicles were allowed to reach steady state with respect to pH gradient for 5 min at 25 °C before the addition of 45Ca2+ (6 mCi/ml; American Radiolabeled Chemicals, St. Louis, MO) or 54Mn2+ (6.5 mCi/ml; PerkinElmer Life Sciences). The final concentration of Ca2+ and Mn2+ in the reaction mixture was 10 µM and 1 mM, respectively. At the indicated times, aliquots (70 µl) of the reaction mix were removed and filtered through premoistened 0.45-µm pore size cellulose acetate GS-type filters (Millipore, Bedford, MA). After a 1-ml wash with ice-cold wash buffer (0.3 M sorbitol, 5 mM Tris-MES, pH 7.6, 25 mM KCl, and 0.1 mM CaCl2 or MnCl2 as appropriate), the filters were air-dried, and radioactivity was determined by liquid scintillation counting. For metal competition experiments, Delta pH-dependent 10 µM 45Ca2+ uptake was measured at a 10-min time point in the presence of 100 µM or 1 mM nonradioactive metals.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

CAX2, but not CAX1, CAX3, or CAX4, Suppresses the Mn2+ Sensitivity of a Yeast Mutant-- Yeast strains lacking functional calcineurin (for example cnb strains) display increased Mn2+ sensitivity due, in part, to decreased activity of the Golgi Ca2+/Mn2+-ATPase PMR1 (23, 29, 30). Furthermore, the additional lack of the vacuolar Ca2+/H+ antiporter VCX1 (cnb vcx1 strains) slightly exacerbates the Mn2+ sensitivity of calcineurin mutants (30), indicating that VCX1 may transport Mn2+ in addition to Ca2+. Yeast mutants deleted in VCX1 and the vacuolar Ca2+-ATPase PMC1 are sensitive to high concentrations of Ca2+ in the media (23). Expression of VCX1 and N-terminally truncated CAX2 can suppress both the Mn2+ and Ca2+ sensitivity of a yeast mutant (K667, pmc1 vcx1 cnb1) defective in calcineurin and the vacuolar Ca2+ transporters (16). As shown previously, N-terminal truncations of CAX1 can strongly suppress the Ca2+ sensitivity of these strains, whereas N-terminal truncations of CAX4 only weakly suppress the Ca2+ phenotype, and N-terminal truncations of CAX3 are unable to suppress the Ca2+ phenotype (11, 31, 32). We were interested in testing whether these characterized CAX transporters could suppress the Mn2+ sensitivity of this yeast strain. As shown in Fig. 1, these CAX transporters cannot suppress the Mn2+ sensitivity phenotype of the yeast mutant. Additionally, the mung bean Ca2+/H+ antiporter, VCAX1 (28), could not suppress Mn2+ sensitivity (data not shown). Only N-terminally truncated CAX2-expressing yeast mutants were capable of growing on plates containing 10 mM MnCl2 (Fig. 1).


View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Ca2+ and Mn2+ tolerance of a yeast mutant by Arabidopsis cation/H+ antiporters. Suppression of Ca2+ and Mn2+ sensitivity of the pmc1 vcx1 cnb yeast mutant (K667) by various CAX transporters. Saturated liquid cultures of K667 containing the indicated plasmids were diluted to the cell densities as indicated and then spotted onto medium permissive for growth of strains harboring the plasmid (-His) and medium that selects for the presence of plasmid-borne vacuolar Ca2+ or Mn2+ transport (YPD medium containing 175 mM CaCl2 or 10 mM MnCl2). The strains grown at 30 °C on -His medium and YPD with metal medium were photographed after 1 and 2 days, respectively. A representative experiment is shown.

Construction of CAX1/CAX2 Chimeras-- Utilizing chimeric CAX constructs in which parts of the CAX1 and CAX3 transporters were exchanged, a 9-amino acid region between putative transmembrane domains (TMD) 1 and 2 of CAX1 has been identified as important in mediating Ca2+/H+ transport (14). We have termed this domain the CaD. Swapping of the equivalent 9 amino acids of CAX3 into CAX1 abolished CAX1-mediated Ca2+/H+ transport. Alternatively, swapping of the CAX1 CaD into CAX3 allowed this chimeric CAX transporter to transport Ca2+ (14). As CAX2 is the only plant CAX transporter characterized to date with the ability to suppress the Mn2+ sensitivity of calcineurin-deficient yeast mutants (Fig. 1), a similar series of chimeric CAX constructs utilizing CAX2 should delineate the Mn2+ specificity domain(s) of this transporter. We chose to make chimeric constructs between CAX1 and CAX2 because each construct should maintain the ability to transport Ca2+. Thus, the fidelity of each construct could be rapidly assessed through suppression of Ca2+ sensitivity, and we could then test for alterations in Mn2+ suppression. Initially we planned a systematic approach to identify CAX2 Mn2+ specificity domains, similar to that used to identify the CaD of CAX1 (14). We chose to divide CAX1 and CAX2 into four segments of approximately equal size and exchange each segment to create eight different chimeric constructs (33). Although the construction of the chimeric clones was successful, Ca2+ antiport activity was abolished for some of the constructs, indicating that protein stability was affected (data not shown). Therefore, an alternative approach was used.

At the amino acid level, CAX2 is 43% identical (56% similar) to the CAX1 open reading frame. A sequence comparison among CAX1, CAX2, CAX3, and CAX4 identified five short domains, each consisting of 9-15 amino acids, which had very low sequence similarity between CAX1 and CAX2 (Fig. 2). We have designated these domains A to E. The A domain (amino acids 65-73 of CAX1) is present at the start of TMD 1, the B domain (amino acids 150-160 of CAX1) is present between TMD 3 and 4, the C domain (amino acids 175-184 of CAX1) is present in TMD 4, the D domain (amino acids 219-233 of CAX1) is present between TMD 5 and 6, and the E domain (amino acids 257-265 of CAX1) is present between TMD 6 and the acidic motif. There is very little variation among CAX1, CAX3, CAX4, and the mung bean VCAX1 in domains A, B, C, and E, whereas domain D and the region corresponding to the CAX1 9-amino acid CaD is very divergent among all CAX sequences (Fig. 2). We created five mutants in CAX2 that contain the corresponding CAX1 A, B, C, D, or E domain. These mutants were designated CAX2-A, CAX2-B, CAX2-C, CAX2-D, and CAX2-E, respectively. For these studies we have also used the previously constructed CAX2-9 construct, which contains the CAX1 9-amino acid CaD (14). All of the mutants were N-terminally truncated, i.e. constructed without the first 42 amino acids of CAX2. Because we had previously found that some CAX1/CAX2 chimeric clones had altered protein stability, it was very important to verify that each construct was expressed at approximately equal levels in yeast, and so we tagged each chimeric construct with a C-terminal c-Myc epitope and analyzed protein expression (Fig. 3). Each chimera was expressed similarly to CAX1 and CAX2.


View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Alignment of deduced amino acid sequence of polypeptides encoded by Arabidopsis thaliana CAX1, CAX2, CAX3, and CAX4 and the targets of CAX2 mutagenesis. Five clusters of amino acids in CAX2 that are different from those of CAX1 were selected for mutagenesis to their respective CAX1 sequences (designated A to E, bold overlines). The 9-amino acid region reported in a previous study (14) was included in this investigation. Alignments were performed using a program by Corpet (49). Consensus amino acid residues are boxed in black (identical) or gray (similar). Gaps introduced to maximize the alignments are denoted by hyphens. The 11 putative transmembrane spans (M1-M11) predicted for CAX1 and the central hydrophilic motif rich in acidic residues are overlined. The translation starting sites for the N-terminally truncated constructs used in this study (sCAX1, sCAX2, sCAX3, and sCAX4) are indicated by arrows. CAX4 was truncated by the addition of a Met residue before Ala39 as described previously (32). The GenBankTM accession numbers for CAX1 to CAX4 are AF461691, AF424628, AF256229, and AF409107, respectively.


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Expression levels of CAX1, CAX2, and CAX2 chimeric constructs. Western blot showing relative expression levels of various constructs with C-terminal c-Myc tags used in the tolerance assay. Equal amounts of total protein isolated from yeast strains expressing each c-Myc-tagged construct as indicated were separated by SDS-PAGE, blotted, and then subjected to Western blot analysis using an anti-c-Myc monoclonal antibody.

Altered Ca2+- and Mn2+-sensitive Yeast Growth by CAX2 Mutants-- As we anticipated, each of these constructs could suppress the Ca2+ sensitivity of the yeast mutants relatively equally when grown on 200 mM CaCl2 (Fig. 4). However, when the yeast strains expressing these constructs were grown on higher levels of Ca2+ (250 mM CaCl2), we observed growth differences. Although the CAX2-C-, CAX2-D-, CAX2-E-, and CAX2-9-expressing strains grew in a manner similar to CAX2 strains, the CAX2-A- and CAX2-B-expressing strains were significantly reduced in their growth under these media conditions (Fig. 4). In media containing 10 mM MnCl2, yeast strains harboring the CAX2, CAX2-9, CAX2-D, and CAX2-E constructs all grew (Fig. 5). Like strains expressing CAX1, those expressing CAX2-A, CAX2-B, and CAX2-C completely failed to suppress Mn2+ sensitivity. Even at lower MnCl2 concentrations (5 mM), the CAX2-A, CAX2-B, and CAX2-C strains were unable to grow (Fig. 5).


View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   The effect of CAX1 domains mobilized into CAX2 on the suppression of Ca2+ sensitivity in yeast. Suppression of Ca2+ sensitivity of the pmc1 vcx1 cnb yeast mutant, K667, by various CAX constructs. The same assay conditions were used as described in the legend for Fig. 1, except yeast growth is shown on YPD containing 200 mM and 250 mM CaCl2. A representative experiment is shown.


View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Identification of domains in CAX2 that are necessary for conferring Mn2+ tolerance in yeast. Suppression of Mn2+ sensitivity of the pmc1 vcx1 cnb yeast mutant, K667, by various CAX constructs. The same assay conditions were used as described in the legend for Fig. 1, except yeast growth is shown on YPD containing 5 mM and 10 mM MnCl2. A representative experiment is shown.

Ca2+ and Mn2+ Transport-- To examine the Ca2+ transport properties of these three Mn2+-negative mutants directly, Delta pH-dependent 10 µM 45Ca2+ uptake into yeast membrane vesicles was measured (Fig. 6A). Ca2+ antiport activity mediated by CAX2-A and CAX2-B was significantly lower than for CAX2 (57.4 and 33.4% of CAX2 activity, respectively), whereas Ca2+ antiport activity mediated by CAX2-C was not significantly different from CAX2. The ability to suppress the Mn2+ sensitivity of the yeast mutants infers Mn2+ transport capability. However, it is important to demonstrate directly that these CAX2 constructs mediate Mn2+/H+ antiport activity in yeast. Therefore, we measured Delta pH-dependent 1 mM 54MnCl2 uptake into microsomal vesicles isolated from K667 yeast strains expressing various CAX transporters. Mn2+/H+ transport activity was observed in membrane vesicles from CAX2- and CAX2-E-expressing strains (Fig. 6B), but no Mn2+/H+ antiport activity was detectable in vesicles from CAX1- or CAX2-C-expressing yeast (data not shown). The Mn2+/H+ antiport activity measured from CAX2-E vesicles was modestly greater than the activity of CAX2 (Fig. 6B), confirming the slight increase in yeast growth of CAX2-E strains compared with CAX2 strains on high Mn2+ media (Fig. 5).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Direct 45Ca2+ and 54Mn2+ transport of CAX2 and CAX2 chimeric constructs. A, a single 10-min time point measurement of Delta pH-dependent 10 µM 45Ca2+ uptake in microsomes extracted from yeast expressing wild type CAX2, CAX2-A, CAX2-B, or CAX2-C. Results are shown following subtraction of the protonophore gramicidin background values. B, a time course of 1 mM 54Mn2+ transport into microsomes extracted from yeast strains expressing the wild type CAX2 or CAX2-E. Solid line, uptake in the absence of 5 µM gramicidin; broken line, uptake in the presence of 5 µM gramicidin. The data in A and B represent the means (±S.E.) of two replications and are representative of at least three independent experiments.

Analysis of the CAX2 C-Domain-- The CAX2-C-expressing strains have a specific defect in Mn2+ tolerance, as the growth of these strains is largely indistinguishable from CAX2- on Ca2+-containing media (Fig. 4) despite the lack of growth on Mn2+-containing media (Fig. 5). The inability of the CAX2-A- and CAX2-B-expressing strains to suppress Mn2+ sensitivity also implicates these domains as being involved in Mn2+ transport (Fig. 5). However, CAX2-A- and CAX2-B-expressing strains also exhibited diminished growth on Ca2+-containing media and decreased Ca2+/H+ antiport activity (Figs. 4 and 6A), suggesting a nonspecific reduction in transport capabilities. To examine which amino acids were involved in determining the Mn2+ specificity of CAX2-C, we divided the CAX2 C domain into two regions, each containing 3 different amino acids than those present in the CAX1 C domain. The CAX2-C1 chimera contains the 3 amino acids TSL from CAX1, replacing amino acids CAF of CAX2, and the CAX2-C2 construct contains the 3 amino acids IAN from CAX1, replacing the amino acids LVF of CAX2 (Fig. 2). Yeast strains expressing the CAX2-C2 construct were indistinguishable from CAX2, as these strains could suppress both the Ca2+ and Mn2+ sensitivity of K667 yeast (Fig. 7A). Yeast strains expressing CAX2-C1 were able to strongly suppress the Ca2+ sensitivity phenotype, but there was no growth of these strains on Mn2+-containing media. When the transport properties of CAX2-C1 were determined by direct Delta pH-dependent 45Ca2+ and 54Mn2+ uptake measurements into membrane vesicles prepared from CAX2-C1-expressing yeast, CAX2-C1 was found to have significant Ca2+/H+ antiport activity, which was indistinguishable from that of CAX2, but no Mn2+/H+ antiport activity (Fig. 7B).


View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Identification of amino acids in the C domain of CAX2 that are responsible for the loss of Mn2+ tolerance. A, suppression of Ca2+ and Mn2+ sensitivity of the pmc1 vcx1 cnb yeast mutant, K667, by CAX2, CAX2-C1, and CAX2-C2 constructs. The same assay conditions were used as described in the legend for Fig. 1, except yeast growth is shown on YPD containing 200 mM CaCl2 and YPD containing 10 mM MnCl2. The CAX2 C domain consists of 10 amino acids of which only the first 3 and the last 3 are heterologous between CAX1 and CAX2 (see Fig. 2). The first 3 amino acids (C1 domain) were changed to the equivalent amino acids in CAX1 (to give CAX2-C1), and the last 3 amino acids (C2 domain) were changed to the equivalent amino acids in CAX1 (to give CAX2-C2). A representative experiment is shown. B, single time point measurements of Delta pH-dependent 10 µM 45Ca2+ uptake (left) and Delta pH-dependent 1 mM 54Mn2+ uptake (right) into microsomal vesicles extracted from K667 yeast expressing wild type CAX2 or CAX2-C1. Ca2+ uptake was measured at 10 min, and Mn2+ uptake was measured at 30 min. The results are shown following subtraction of the protonophore gramicidin background values. The data represent the means (±S.E.) of three to six replicates.

Cation Selectivity Comparisons of CAX2 Mutants-- To further analyze the altered transport properties of the CAX2 mutants, competition experiments were performed. This approach allowed us to determine the effect of the domain swapping between CAX1 and CAX2 on cation selectivity. Delta pH-dependent 10 µM 45Ca2+ uptake was measured at a single 10-min time point into yeast microsomal vesicles isolated from strains expressing CAX1, CAX2, and the six CAX2 mutants. Ca2+ uptake determined in the absence of excess nonradioactive metal (control) was compared with Ca2+ uptake determined in the presence of two concentrations (10× and 100×) of various nonradioactive metals (Fig. 8). Inhibition of Ca2+ uptake by nonradioactive Ca2+ was used as an internal control, and as expected, Ca2+ uptake by each CAX transporter was strongly inhibited by excess Ca2+. Nonradioactive Ca2+, particularly the 10× concentrations, did not completely inhibit Ca2+ uptake, further highlighting the low Ca2+ affinity of the CAX transporters. We have previously demonstrated that tobacco plants ectopically expressing CAX2 have significantly increased vacuolar transport of Cd2+ (16). Ca2+ uptake by CAX1 and CAX2 were both strongly inhibited by Cd2+, and this Cd2+ inhibition was consistently observed in all of the six CAX2 mutants. However, this inhibition was only significant for all CAX constructs at the higher Cd2+ concentration. In agreement with the yeast suppression and 54Mn2+/H+ antiport data, excess nonradioactive Mn2+ inhibited Ca2+ transport by CAX2 but not by CAX1. Of the CAX2 mutants, Mn2+ inhibition was only observed for CAX2-D, CAX2-E, and CAX2-9, but not for CAX2-A, CAX2-B and CAX2-C, confirming the yeast suppression data. Two other divalent cations, Zn2+ and Ni2+, were also tested. No significant Ca2+ uptake inhibition by Zn2+ was observed for CAX1, whereas for CAX2, the degree of Ca2+ uptake inhibition by Zn2+ was similar to that observed for Mn2+. These results indicate that CAX2 may also be able to transport Zn2+. To test this theory further, CAX2 was expressed in a highly Zn2+-sensitive yeast double mutant (zrc1 cot1) lacking the vacuolar cation diffusion facilitator (CDF) transporters ZRC1 and COT1 (34). The results were inconsistent, and it was concluded that CAX2 was unable to significantly suppress the Zn2+ sensitivity of the double mutant (data not shown). The highest concentration of excess Zn2+ was able to inhibit Ca2+ uptake to varying degrees by every CAX2 mutant except CAX2-C. However, except for CAX2-9, no inhibition of Ca2+ uptake was seen by the lower Zn2+ concentration for any of the CAX2 mutants. Ni2+ inhibited Ca2+ uptake by CAX1 only when added at the higher concentration, but no significant inhibition by Ni2+ was observed for CAX2 or any CAX2 mutant.


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Inhibition of Ca2+ uptake by CAX1, CAX2, and CAX2 derivatives into yeast endomembrane vesicles in the presence of other metals. Uncoupler-sensitive (Delta pH-dependent) uptake of 10 µM 45Ca2+, estimated as the difference between uptake with and without 5 µM gramicidin, was measured in the absence (control) or presence of 10× or 100× nonradioactive CaCl2, MnCl2, CdCl2, ZnCl2, or NiCl2 after 10 min. Ca2+ uptake values are shown following subtraction of the gramicidin background values and expressed as percentages of the control in the absence of any excess nonradiolabeled metals. "C" denotes the control samples. The data represent the means of two to eight replications from two to four independent membrane preparations, and the bars indicate S.E. In the summary table, + and - signs indicate the presence or absence of competition by each cation, respectively.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Previously, CAX2 has been shown to suppress yeast mutants sensitive to high Mn2+concentrations, localize to the plant vacuolar membrane, and increase Ca2+, Cd2+, and Mn2+ accumulation and vacuolar transport when expressed ectopically in tobacco (16). In this study we confirm by direct transport measurements that CAX2 is a Mn2+/H+ antiporter. Although we have not determined the Km for Mn2+ of CAX2, experimental observations indicate that it has a low affinity for Mn2+. CAX2 Ca2+ transport activity could be measured using 10 µM 45CaCl2. However, to measure Mn2+ transport activity by CAX2, 1 mM 54MnCl2 had to be used (Fig. 6), as activity was very weak when measured using 100 µM 54MnCl2 and could not be detected using 10 µM 54MnCl2. Furthermore, a 10× excess of nonradioactive CaCl2 was able to inhibit 50% of 10 µM 45Ca2+ transport activity mediated by CAX2, whereas only a 100× excess of nonradioactive MnCl2 was able to inhibit 50% of activity (Fig. 8). Similarly, measurements of vacuolar cation/H+ antiport activity from oat root indicate that H+-dependent transport of Mn2+ is less efficient than that of Ca2+, Cd2+, or Zn2+ (9). However, CAX2-expressing plants were slightly more tolerant to Mn2+ in the growth media (16), demonstrating that despite being a low affinity antiporter, CAX2 can be an important component in providing Mn2+ tolerance. Here we demonstrate that CAX1, CAX3, and CAX4 cannot suppress the Mn2+ sensitivity of a yeast mutant (K667; pmc1 vcx1 cnb1), which suggests that ectopic expression of these transporters in plants will cause altered accumulation, transport, and possibly tolerance to a different spectrum of cations than CAX2. These findings also suggest that unique amino acids in the CAX2 transporter confer Mn2+ specificity and that the CAX2 transporter is a valuable biological tool for studying the metal specificity of vacuolar metal/H+ transporters.

Other antiporters are used by a variety of organisms to remove metals from the cytoplasm. The CDF family of transporters is found in bacteria and eukaryotes (17). They transport heavy metals including Ni2+, Co2+, Cd2+, and Zn2+ and exhibit an unusual degree of sequence divergence. The mechanisms of energy coupling are not well understood, but these proteins probably function by H+ antiport for metal efflux. For example, Zn2+ transport into vacuolar membrane vesicles by the S. cerevisiae CDF transporter ZRC1 is ATP-dependent, requiring a H+ gradient generated by the V-ATPase (35). Cd2+, Zn2+, and Co2+ efflux in many bacteria is mediated by cation/H+ antiport. For example, in Ralstonia sp., metal/H+ antiport is catalyzed by CzcD and the CzcCBA protein complex (36, 37). However, the overall sequence and topology of CDF and CzcCBA proteins do not resemble the CAX transporters.

Little is known regarding the substrate specificity of divalent cation/H+ transporters from any organism, much less the domains that confer this specificity. For example, a spontaneous mutant yeast strain, due to a point mutation in the yeast Ca2+/H+ exchanger VCX1, has increased Mn2+ resistance compared with wild type yeast (38). However, no ion competition studies or direct Mn2+ transport measurements have been done on the native or mutated forms of the transporter. Mutation analysis of a bacterial cation/H+ antiporter, CzcA, identified two conserved Asp residues and a Glu residue within a transmembrane span that are essential for metal resistance and antiport activity, but no alteration in metal specificity was observed (39). Recently it has been described that the C-terminal tail of a cyanobacterial Na+/H+ antiporter has a role in determining ion specificity (40). Exchange of the C-terminal tail between similar Na+/H+ antiporters from Aphanothece halophytica and Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 greatly affected ion specificity, particularly with respect to Li+/H+ antiport activity (40). However, this may have little significance to CAX2, as these antiporters have very little sequence similarity with the CAX-like antiporters and are predominantly alkali metal transporters rather than divalent heavy metal transporters.

A 9-amino acid domain located between putative membrane spanning domains 1 and 2 was identified recently as an important domain in mediating CAX1 specificity toward Ca2+. Inserting this CaD of CAX1 into CAX2 (CAX2-9) increases Ca2+ transport of this chimeric construct but does not appear to alter substrate specificity globally (14). As we demonstrate here, K667 yeast strains expressing CAX2-9 maintain CAX2-like suppression of the Mn2+ sensitivity phenotype, further implicating another domain in the mediation of CAX2 Mn2+ specificity.

Utilizing CAX2 chimeric constructs in a robust yeast assay for Mn2+ and Ca2+ tolerance, we identified a domain that appears to be involved specifically in Mn2+ transport. We have termed this domain, located in TMD 4 at amino acids 177-186 of CAX2, the C-domain (Fig. 2). When the CAX1 C-domain was inserted into CAX2 (CAX2-C) and expressed in yeast, the strains strongly suppressed the yeast Ca2+ sensitivity in a manner similar to CAX2 (Fig. 4); however, these strains failed to suppress the Mn2+ sensitivity (CAX1-like phenotype). All of the yeast growth differences on both Ca2+ and Mn2+ media were confirmed in direct measurements of 45Ca2+ and 54Mn2+ transport and ion competition studies (Figs. 6, 7B, and 8). CAX2 transported 54Mn2+, whereas CAX2-C and CAX1 did not. Furthermore, excess nonradioactive Mn2+ inhibited CAX2-mediated 45Ca2+ transport but did not inhibit CAX1 or CAX2-C 45Ca2+ transport (Fig. 8). Strains expressing the CAX2-C1 mutant, which contains only the CAF to TSL change, had the same phenotype as the CAX2-C mutant. Moreover, direct 54Mn2+ transport measurements confirmed that the lack of growth on Mn2+-containing media of yeast expressing CAX2-C1 was due to the loss of Mn2+/H+ antiport activity by CAX2, resulting from the CAF to TSL change. Of all the domains studied in these experiments (domains A to E and the 9-amino acid domain), only the C domain is located within a TMD. Because of this transmembrane localization, we tentatively suggest that these CAF residues within the CAX2 TMD4 may be part of a pore that confers Mn2+ specificity.

It is interesting to note that the CAX2 CAF residues are also found in the deduced amino acid sequences of the putative Arabidopsis CAX5 (Arabidopsis genome initiative number At1g55730) and CAX6 (At1g55720) transporters, as well as ZCAX2 (GenBankTM accession number AB044567) from Zea mays, suggesting that these CAX transporters may also transport Mn2+. Additionally, the yeast Ca2+/H+ antiporter VCX1 contains LCF residues at this domain, hinting that this region is more similar to CAX2 than to CAX1.

This putative Mn2+ domain may also be involved in Zn2+ transport. In competition studies, 45Ca2+ transport mediated by CAX2, CAX2-A, -B, -D, -E, and CAX2-9 was inhibited by 100× excess Zn2+, whereas CAX1- and CAX2-C-mediated 45Ca2+ transport was not (Fig. 8). The inability of CAX2 to suppress the Zn2+ sensitivity of the zrc1 cot1 S. cerevisiae mutant (data not shown) may infer that CAX2 does not transport Zn2+. However, another putative vacuolar Zn2+ transporter, ZAT1 of Arabidopsis, failed to suppress the Zn2+ sensitivity of this strain but was able to suppress a Schizosaccharomyces pombe Zn2+-sensitive mutant (41). Future direct measurements of Zn2+ transport in yeast strains expressing CAX2, CAX2-C, CAX2-C1, and CAX2-C2 will need to be performed to confirm whether this observed inhibition of Ca2+ transport by Zn2+ was in fact due to Zn2+/H+ antiport by CAX2, and if so, to distinguish the Mn2+ and Zn2+ domains of CAX2. The competition experiment also gave an indication that CAX1 but not CAX2 may transport Ni2+. Furthermore, it appears that none of the domains analyzed are involved in Ni2+ transport.

Given that both CAX1 and CAX2 can strongly suppress the K667 yeast Ca2+ sensitive phenotype, we were surprised that the CAX2-A and CAX2-B constructs demonstrated weaker Ca2+ suppression (Fig. 4) and reduced Ca2+/H+ antiport activity (Fig. 6) as well as the loss of Mn2+/H+ antiport, as inferred from the lack of Mn2+ suppression (Fig. 5). Both proteins appeared to be expressed at high levels in yeast (Fig. 3), but perturbations in protein folding or membrane topology may not allow these proteins to be fully functional. These alterations in transport have also abolished the Mn2+ competition of CAX2-A- and CAX2-B-mediated Ca2+ transport, and therefore we cannot completely rule out the possibility that these domains play some role in Mn2+ transport. Thus, using this chimeric gene approach, we cannot precisely assess the roles of these domains in metal specificity. However, the difference between these constructs and CAX2-C is noteworthy.

Many transition metal transporters, such as those of the Nramp and ZIP transporter families, appear to have broad substrate ranges (1, 42). However, there has been little research into the understanding of the molecular mechanisms determining substrate specificity and how it can be altered. Other techniques have been used to understand and alter transport specificity in different types of metal transporters. The Arabidopsis plasma membrane transporter, IRT1, transports Cd2+, Fe2+, Mn2+, and Zn2+ (42). Replacing Asp residues at either position 100 or 136 with an Ala eliminates transport of both Fe2+ and Mn2+ (43). Similarly, replacement of a Glu residue with Ala at position 103 eliminates the ability of Zn2+ transport by IRT1 but retains the transport of other metals. A number of other residues in or nearby transmembrane domains appear to be essential for IRT1 function. Mutagenesis of a charged residue within a membrane-spanning domain in the yeast Golgi Ca2+/Mn2+-ATPase PMR1 has normal Ca2+ transport but a 60-fold reduction in the apparent affinity for Mn2+ (44). Substitution of Ser with Ala at position 775 in membrane-spanning region 5 in a Na+/K+-ATPase causes a 30-fold decrease in K+ but not Na+ affinity (45, 46). Increased Na+ affinity has also been reported by a point mutation in a wheat K+-Na+ transporter (47). Future studies, focusing on altering other regions in CAX2, may delineate other domains involved in metal specificity.

In summary, we have shown that it is possible to generate a metal/H+ antiporter that is more specific to a particular metal, in this case Ca2+, by mutation of a discrete amino acid domain. The CAX2 constructs described here demonstrate the validity of altering the metal transport profile of a CAX family member. Examples of how such transporters could prove beneficial include making transgenic crop plants that express high levels of CAX2 variants that no longer transport Mn2+. Unlike CAX1 ectopic expression, CAX2 expression is not deleterious to plant growth (48). CAX2 variants could be used to accumulate higher levels of a Ca2+ but not accumulate unwanted metals, thereby boosting the bioavailable Ca2+ in foods. In future studies we may be able to use a similar mutagenic approach to increasing the specificity toward other, more toxic metals. Alternatively, ectopic expression of CAX2 variants that have increased metal transport could be used to help remove toxic metals from soils. The first step toward these applications is expressing these CAX2 variants in plants and analyzing the changes in metal accumulation and vacuolar metal transport.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Ning-Hui Cheng for critical reading of the manuscript and Michael Grusak for radioactive manganese.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by the United States Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service under Cooperative Agreement 58-6250-6001 and by National Institutes of Health Grants CHRC 5 P30 and 1R01 GM57427.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ These authors contributed equally to this work.

** To whom correspondence should be addressed: USDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, 1100 Bates St., Houston, TX 77030. Tel.: 713-798-7011; Fax: 713-798-7078; E-mail: kendalh@bcm.tmc.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 22, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M209952200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: CAX, cation exchanger; CaD, Ca2+ domain; CDF, cation diffusion facilitator; MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid; sCAX, N-terminally truncated CAX; YPD, yeast extract-peptone-dextrose medium; TMD, transmembrane domain.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Cohen, A., Nelson, H., and Nelson, N. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 33388-33394[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Marty, F. (1999) Plant Cell 11, 587-599[Free Full Text]
3. Williams, L. E., Pittman, J. K., and Hall, J. L. (2000) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1465, 104-126[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Hall, J. L. (2002) J. Exp. Bot. 53, 1-11[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Schumaker, K. S., and Sze, H. (1985) Plant Physiol. 79, 1111-1117
6. Salt, D. E., and Wagner, G. J. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 12297-12302[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Amalou, Z., Gibrat, R., Trouslot, P., and Dauzac, J. (1994) Plant Physiol. 106, 79-85[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Maeshima, M. (2001) Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 52, 469-497[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Gonzalez, A., Koren'kov, V., and Wagner, G. J. (1999) Physiol. Plant. 106, 203-209[CrossRef]
10. Koren'kov, V. D., Shepherd, R. W., and Wagner, G. J. (2002) Physiol. Plant. 116, 359-367
11. Hirschi, K. D., Zhen, R.-G., Cunningham, K. W., Rea, P. A., and Fink, G. R. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 8782-8786[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Gaxiola, R. A., Rao, R. I., Sherman, A., Grisafi, P., Alper, S. L., and Fink, G. R. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 1480-1485[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Shaul, O., Hilgemann, D. W., de-Almeida-Engler, J., Van Montagu, M., Inzé, D., and Galili, G. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 3973-3980[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Shigaki, T., Cheng, N.-H., Pittman, J. K., and Hirschi, K. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 43152-43159[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Blumwald, E., and Poole, R. J. (1986) Plant Physiol. 80, 727-731
16. Hirschi, K. D., Korenkov, V. D., Wilganowski, N. L., and Wagner, G. J. (2000) Plant Physiol. 124, 125-133[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Mäser, P., Thomine, S., Schroeder, J. I., Ward, J. M., Hirschi, K., Sze, H., Talke, I. N., Amtmann, A., Maathuis, F. J. M., Sanders, D., Harper, J. F., Tchieu, J., Gribskov, M., Persans, M. W., Salt, D. E., Kim, S. A., and Guerinot, M.-L. (2001) Plant Physiol. 126, 1646-1667[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Pittman, J. K., and Hirschi, K. D. (2001) Plant Physiol. 127, 1020-1029[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Pittman, J. K., Shigaki, T., Cheng, N.-H., and Hirschi, K. D. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 26452-26459[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Pittman, J. K., Sreevidya, C. S., Shigaki, T., Ueoka-Nakanishi, H., and Hirschi, K. D. (2002) Plant Physiol. 130, 1054-1062[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Schaaf, G., Catoni, E., Fitz, M., Schwacke, R., Schneider, A., von Wirén, N., and Frommer, W. B. (2002) Plant Biol. 4, 612-618[CrossRef]
22. Salt, D. E., Smith, R. D., and Raskin, I. (1998) Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 49, 643-668[CrossRef]
23. Cunningham, K. W., and Fink, G. R. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 2226-2237[Abstract]
24. Nathan, D. F., Vos, M. H., and Lindquist, S. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 1409-1414[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Gietz, R. D., Schiestl, R. H., Willems, A. R., and Woods, R. A. (1995) Yeast 11, 355-360[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A., and Struhl, K. (1998) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology , Greene Publishing Associates/Wiley Interscience, New York
27. Shigaki, T., and Hirschi, K. D. (2001) Anal. Biochem. 298, 118-120[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Ueoka-Nakanishi, H., Tsuchiya, T., Sasaki, M., Nakanishi, Y., Cunningham, K. W., and Maeshima, M. (2000) Eur. J. Biochem. 267, 3090-3098[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Farcasanu, I. C., Hirata, D., Tsuchiya, E., Nishiyama, F., and Miyakawa, T. (1995) Eur. J. Biochem. 232, 712-717[Abstract]
30. Pozos, T. C., Sekler, I., and Cyert, M. S. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 3730-3741[Abstract]
31. Shigaki, T., and Hirschi, K. D. (2000) Gene 257, 291-298[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Cheng, N.-H., Pittman, J. K., Shigaki, T., and Hirschi, K. D. (2002) Plant Physiol. 128, 1245-1254[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Shigaki, T., and Hirschi, K. D. (2002) BioTechniques 32, 736-740[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. MacDiarmid, C. W., Gaither, L. A., and Eide, D. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 2845-2855[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. MacDiarmid, C. W., Milanick, M. A., and Eide, D. J. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 39187-39194[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Nies, D. H. (1992) J. Bacteriol. 174, 8102-8110[Abstract]
37. Nies, D. H. (1995) J. Bacteriol. 177, 2707-2712[Abstract]
38. Del Pozo, L., Osaba, L., Corchero, J., and Jimenez, A. (1999) Yeast 15, 371-375[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Goldberg, M., Pribyl, T., Juhnke, S., and Nies, D. H. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 26065-26070[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Waditee, R., Hibino, T., Tanaka, Y., Nakamura, T., Incharoensakdi, A., and Takabe, T. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 36931-36938[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Bloss, T., Clemens, S., and Nies, D. H. (2002) Planta 214, 783-791[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Korshunova, Y. O., Eide, D., Clark, W. G., Guerinot, M. L., and Pakrasi, H. B. (1999) Plant Mol. Biol. 40, 37-44[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Rogers, E. E., Eide, D., and Guerinot, M. L. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 12356-12360[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Wei, Y., Chen, J., Rosas, G., Tompkins, D. A., Holt, P. A., and Rao, R. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 23927-23932[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Blostein, R., Wilczynska, A., Karlish, S. J. D., Arguello, J. M., and Lingrel, J. B (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 24987-24993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Pedersen, P. A., Nielsen, J. M., Rasmussen, J. H., and Jorgensen, P. L. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 17818-17827[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Rubio, F., Gassmann, W., and Schroeder, J. I. (1995) Science 270, 1660-1663[Abstract]
48. Hirschi, K. (2001) Trends Plant Sci. 6, 100-104[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Corpet, F. (1988) Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 10881-10890[Abstract]


Copyright © 2003 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.