Increased Protein Stability as a Mechanism That Enhances Nrf2-mediated Transcriptional Activation of the Antioxidant Response Element

DEGRADATION OF Nrf2 BY THE 26 S PROTEASOME*

Truyen NguyenDagger §, Philip J. SherrattDagger , H.-C. HuangDagger , Chung S. Yang§, and Cecil B. PickettDagger

From the Dagger  Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth, New Jersey 07033 and the § Laboratory for Cancer Research, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854

Received for publication, July 19, 2002, and in revised form, November 15, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Nrf2 (NF-E2-related factor 2) is a central transcription factor involved in the transcriptional activation of many genes encoding phase II drug-metabolizing enzymes via the antioxidant response element. Nrf2 has previously been found to undergo nuclear translocation by a phosphorylation-dependent mechanism mediated by protein kinase C in HepG2 cells treated with tert-butylhydroquinone, beta -naphthoflavone, or 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate. In the present report, we have found that the levels of Nrf2 were increased in cells treated with tert-butylhydroquinone or beta -naphthoflavone by a post-transcriptional mechanism. Treatment of HepG2 cells with cycloheximide resulted in the loss of Nrf2 within 30 min. By contrast, treatment with the proteasome inhibitors (lactacystin or MG-132) caused an accumulation of Nrf2 as well as an induction of reporter gene activity in cells transfected with the GSTA2 antioxidant response element-chloramphenicol acetyl transferase construct. Similarly, the protein phosphatase inhibitor okadaic acid also caused an accumulation of Nrf2, whereas the reverse effects were observed with PD 98059 and U 0126, two compounds that block the activation of the MAPK/ERK signaling cascade. These data suggest that Nrf2 is degraded by the ubiquitin-dependent pathway and that phosphorylation of Nrf2 leads to an increase in its stability and subsequent transactivation activity.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The antioxidant response element (ARE)1 is a cis-acting enhancer that mediates the transcriptional activation of genes encoding antioxidant and Phase II drug-metabolizing enzymes in response to electrophilic compounds and phenolic antioxidants. Among genes that contain a functional ARE, which has a core sequence 5'-TGACNNNGC-3' (1), are those encoding the mouse and rat glutathione S-transferase (GST) A1 and A2 subunits, respectively (2-4), the rat and human NAD(P)H:quinone reductases (NQO1) (5-7), the human gamma -glutamylcysteine synthetase heavy (gamma -GCSh) and light (gamma -GCSl) subunits (8, 9), heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) (10), and others. Transcriptional activation through the ARE is largely dependent upon the transcription factor NF-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) (11), a member of the Cap'n'Collar (CNC) family of bZIP proteins, as demonstrated by in vitro electrophoretic mobility shift assays and transient transfection experiments (12-15). These data are further supported by in vivo studies using Nrf2-deficient mice. The expression of GstA1 and Nqo1 has been shown to be markedly reduced in Nrf2 (-/-) mice as compared with wild-type animals (16). Both the basal and/or the inducible expression of these enzymes and the gamma -GCS subunits by known ARE inducers were also found to be impaired in these null mice (16, 17). Furthermore, the decreased expression of many antioxidant and Phase II enzymes in Nrf2 (-/-) mice has been linked to the increased sensitivity of these animals to the toxic effects of acetaminophen and carcinogens (18-20). These data provide strong evidence that Nrf2 is critical in the regulation of ARE-responsive genes.

A number of recent studies have focused on identifying the signaling pathways that may be involved in transducing the ARE-mediated response. These include the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades (21-23), the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-dependent pathways (24-26), and the protein kinase C (PKC)-dependent pathway (27). We have previously reported that activation of Nrf2 in HepG2 cells treated with tBHQ, beta -NF, or 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate involves in part a phosphorylation-dependent mechanism mediated by PKC, which appears to promote translocation of the transcription factor into the nucleus (27). These findings support the notion that Nrf2 may be activated by a process that involves a disruption of its interaction with the cytoskeleton-associated protein Keap1 that retains Nrf2 in the cytoplasm (28). Indeed, we have recently obtained evidence showing that phosphorylation of Nrf2 at Ser-40 by PKC interferes with the association between the two proteins (29).

In the present study, we have further explored the mechanisms involved in the activation of this transcription factor. Nrf2 was found to undergo rapid degradation mediated by the 26 S proteasome but became stabilized in cells exposed to tBHQ and beta -NF, leading to its accumulation and enhanced transcriptional activity. The stabilization of Nrf2 appears to depend upon its phosphorylation by a protein kinase(s) associated with the MAPK/ERK signaling cascade. Thus regulation of Nrf2 stability may represent an important mechanism in the activation of ARE-dependent gene expression in response to oxidative stress.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Chemicals and Antibodies-- Cycloheximide (CHX), tBHQ, and beta -NF were obtained from Sigma. Lactacystin (LC), MG-132, okadaic acid (OA), staurosporine (stauro), PD 98059, and U 0126 were obtained from Calbiochem. Antibodies against ubiquitin, and a C-terminal peptide of Nrf2 were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Anti-GAPDH antibodies were obtained from Research Diagnostics Inc. (Flanders, NJ). In addition, antibodies against a peptide derived from the N-terminal region of Nrf2 were raised in rabbits by BIOSOURCE International (Camarillo, CA) for the present study. This antibody specifically recognizes both human and rat Nrf2.

Cell Culture-- HepG2 and H4IIEC3 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, non-essential amino acids, penicillin, and streptomycin, all of which were obtained from Invitrogen. Cells were seeded in 6-well plates at 40-50% confluency and incubated for 20 h prior to treatment with chemicals or for use in transfection experiments. For time-course experiments, cells were treated with chemicals following a schedule such that they would all be harvested simultaneously. Transient transfections were performed using LipofectAMINE Plus reagents according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen). Transfection procedures, plasmid DNA, CAT activity assays, and quantitation methods have been described previously (15).

Immunoblot Analysis and Immunoprecipitation-- HepG2 or H4IIEC3 cells were cultured and treated with chemicals as described above. In the CHX experiments, cells were treated with CHX (5 µg/ml) or pretreated with tBHQ (50 µM) for 2 h before addition of CHX in the time-course assays. In experiments where cells were exposed to OA (20 nM) and tBHQ, both reagents were added simultaneously. Following the treatment period, cells were washed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline buffer and lyzed directly with SDS sample buffer. Total cell lysates were fractionated by SDS-PAGE on 10% or 4-12% polyacrylamide gels, transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes and probed with specific antibodies. Immunoreactive polypeptides were detected by chemiluminescence using ECL reagent purchased from Amersham Biosciences and subsequent autoradiography. Quantitation of the results was performed by exposing the immunoblots directly to a Fuji phosphorimaging device or by analyzing the autoradiogram with a densitometer. For immunoprecipitation, cells were treated with tBHQ (50 µM), LC (5 µM), and MG-132 (10 µM) for 4 h, washed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline buffer, and lyzed in immunoprecipitation buffer as described previously (27). Lysates were incubated with anti-Nrf2 antibodies at 4 °C for 16 h, and the immune complexes were precipitated with protein A-Sepharose beads at 4 °C for an additional 2 h. The precipitates were then washed extensively with immunoprecipitation buffer before fractionation by SDS-PAGE and subsequent immunoblotting with an anti-ubiquitin antibody.

Determination of Human Nrf2 and gamma -GCSh mRNA levels in HepG2 Cells-- The relative levels of mRNA encoding Nrf2 and gamma -GCSh in HepG2 cells were compared by TaqMan® real-time PCR. Total RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) and then treated with RQ1 DNase (Promega). The cDNA was synthesized from 500 ng of total RNA using Superscript-RT (Invitrogen) and subsequently analyzed by TaqMan® using an ABI Prism 7700 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems). Primers and probes were designed for human Nrf2 and gamma -GCSh using the Primer Express Software and were obtained from Applied Biosystems.

For analysis of human Nrf2, the forward 5'-TACTCCCAGGTTGCCCACA-3' and reverse 5'-CATCTACAAACGGGAATGTCTGC-3' primers were used along with the TaqMan® probe 5'-[FAM]-TCAGATGCTTTGTACTTTGATGACTGCATGC-[TAMARA]-3'. For human gamma -GCSh, the forward 5'-TTGCAGGAAGGCATTGATCA-3' and reverse 5'-GCATCATCCAGGTGTATTTTCTCTT-3' primers were used along with the TaqMan® probe 5'-[FAM]-TGGCCCAGCATGTTGCTCATCTCTTTAT-[TAMARA]-3'. In both cases, the forward primer was designed over the first intron/exon boundary of the respective gene and, along with the reverse primer, gave rise to a 91-bp (Nrf2) or 101-bp (gamma -GCSh) amplicon. A primer/probe set for human GAPDH was also obtained from Applied Biosystems.

TaqMan® reactions included 200 nM of each primer with 100 nM of each probe and 1× final concentration of TaqMan® Universal Mastermix (Applied Biosystems). All reactions were carried out with duplicate pipefitting. TaqMan® software was used to calculate a Ct value. The fold increase or decrease in individual mRNAs was calculated as follows: CtNrf2 or Ctgamma -GCSh - CtGAPDH Delta Ct; then the 240-Delta Ct value for treated samples was divided by the same calculated value for control samples.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Increased Levels of Nrf2 Protein in Cells Treated with tBHQ or beta -NF-- Nrf2 has been demonstrated to regulate both the basal and inducible expression of many ARE-responsive genes (17). These observations indicate that Nrf2 is constitutively expressed and that its transactivation activity increases in response to an inducing signal. We sought to determine whether the level of the Nrf2 protein is affected during induction. HepG2 cells were treated with either tBHQ or beta -NF in a time-course experiment, and the level of Nrf2 protein in cell lysates was determined by immunoblot analysis. The blots were first probed with anti-Nrf2 antibodies and followed with anti-GAPDH antibodies. The level of GAPDH was used to normalize for sample loading. As shown in Fig. 1, A and C, the amount of Nrf2 was found to increase within 15 min of treatment with tBHQ, and this continued up to the 8-h time point, where an 8.5-fold increase was observed. By 24 h post-treatment, the level of Nrf2 protein decreased to ~5-fold over the basal level. A similar increase of Nrf2 was also observed in the tBHQ-treated rat hepatoma H4IIEC3 cells (Fig. 1D). To determine whether such effects could be produced by a different ARE inducer, we analyzed lysates from HepG2 cells treated with beta -NF. In this case, the Nrf2 protein level was also found to increase during the time-course experiment, becoming apparent at the 4-h time point with a 3-fold increase over the basal level. The maximal level was attained at 8 h post-treatment (5-fold) and remained at this plateau up to the 24-h time point (Fig. 1, B and C).


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Expression of Nrf2 is increased in cells exposed to tBHQ or beta -NF. Total lysates prepared from HepG2 cells treated with 50 µM tBHQ (A) or beta -NF (B) or from H4IIEC3 cells treated with tBHQ (D) in a time-course assay over a 24-h period were analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-Nrf2 and anti-GAPDH antibodies. The exposure times are indicated at the top of each panel. The positions of protein bands representing Nrf2 and GAPDH are indicated. Nrf2 translated in vitro from an Nrf2-expressing plasmid (15) using a wheat-germ TNT translation system (Promega) was included as control (TNT-Nrf2). The blots shown are representatives of three independent experiments with similar results. C, the results in A and B were quantitated by densitometry, and the Nrf2 values were plotted after normalization with those of GAPDH.

Increased Nrf2 Expression Is Mediated by a Post-transcriptional Mechanism-- To determine whether the increased Nrf2 expression induced by tBHQ in HepG2 cells was the result of an increase in Nrf2 transcription or by a post-transcriptional mechanism, we measured Nrf2 mRNA levels in these cells. Total RNA was isolated from HepG2 cells following exposure to tBHQ for 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 24 h. The RNA was subject to analysis by a quantitative PCR-based approach using oligonucleotide primers specific for Nrf2. As a control, the GAPDH mRNA levels were similarly quantified and used to normalize the data. Fig. 2 shows the results of these experiments. The levels of Nrf2 mRNA were found to be unaffected by tBHQ. To ensure that the tBHQ treatment was effective, we also measured the levels of mRNA for the gamma -GCSh subunit gene. The transcriptional regulation of this gene by tBHQ has been shown to be Nrf2-dependent (13, 17). As shown in Fig. 2, the level of gamma -GCSh mRNA was found to increase gradually starting at 2 h of post-treatment and was highest at the 6-h time point with an ~4-fold increase. Thus tBHQ was effective in eliciting an ARE response in these cells. Together these data indicate that the elevated level of Nrf2 in tBHQ-treated HepG2 cells was not due to an increase in Nrf2 transcription.


View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Nrf2 mRNA level is unaffected in HepG2 cells exposed to tBHQ. HepG2 cells were treated with tBHQ (50 µM) in a time-course assay over a 24-h period, and total RNA was isolated. The RNA was subject to analysis by a quantitative, PCR-based approach (TaqMan®) using the ABI Prism 7700 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems). The PCR was performed using three sets of primers that are specific for Nrf2, gamma -GCSh, and GAPDH, respectively. The values obtained for GAPDH mRNA were used to normalize those of Nrf2 (light shade bars) and gamma -GCSh (dark shade bars) mRNA.

High Rate of Intracellular Nrf2 Turnover-- The elevated Nrf2 level in the absence of an increased rate of transcription implies that the turnover rate for Nrf2 may decrease in response to tBHQ, therefore increasing its stability. To examine this possibility, HepG2 cells were treated with the protein synthesis inhibitor CHX in a time-course experiment (for 0 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 1 h, 1.5 h, and 2 h) and cell lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting. The results of this experiment show that the Nrf2 protein level decreased to ~50% within 15 min of treatment with CHX. A trace amount of Nrf2 was detected after 30 min of exposure to CHX (Fig. 3, A and C). To determine the effects of tBHQ on Nrf2 stability, HepG2 cells were pretreated with tBHQ for 2 h before exposure to CHX in a similar time-course experiment as described above. The results depicted in Fig. 3, B and C show that the level of Nrf2 decreased to ~50% after 30 min of CHX exposure and 5% at the 1-h time point.


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Stabilization of Nrf2 in HepG2 cells exposed to tBHQ. HepG2 cells were treated with 5 µg/ml CHX (A) or pretreated with tBHQ (50 µM) for 2 h followed by CHX (B) over a 2-h time-course period. Cells were lyzed, and total lysates were immunoblotted with anti-Nrf2 antibodies followed by autoradiography. The times indicated above each panel refers to CHX exposure times. The asterisk (*) indicates a nonspecific, cross-reacting protein band. C, the immunoblots were exposed and scanned using a Fuji phosphorimaging device, and the intensity of the protein band was quantitated and plotted on a semi-log graph with the value obtained for cells not treated with CHX set as 100%. The values were normalized with those of GAPDH. The blots shown are representatives of four independent experiments.

Nrf2 Degradation by the Proteasome-- The decreased turnover rate in tBHQ-treated HepG2 cells implies that Nrf2 may become more resistant to degradation. Proteins with regulatory functions, such as the cyclins and transcription activators (30, 31), are commonly degraded by the proteasome through the ubiquitin-dependent pathway. Therefore we sought to determine if Nrf2 might be proteolytically degraded by this pathway. In a time-course experiment, HepG2 cells were treated with the proteasome inhibitor LC for 0 min, 30 min, 1 h, 1.5 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, and 24 h. The cells were lyzed, and total cell extracts were analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-Nrf2 and anti-GAPDH antibodies. The results of these experiments show that intracellular Nrf2 protein started to accumulate within 1.5 h of incubation with LC (a 2-fold increase), and this continued with a 5.5-fold increase by 8 h. By 24 h, the Nrf2 protein decreased to a lower level than that of untreated cells (basal level), presumably because LC was no longer effective in the cells or became toxic (Fig. 4A). To support these data a parallel experiment using a structurally different proteasome inhibitor, MG-132, was performed. As with LC, MG-132 caused a similar pattern of Nrf2 accumulation in the cells (data not shown; Fig. 5A, lane 5). To further confirm the involvement of the 26 S proteasome, immunoprecipitation experiments were performed to detect ubiquitinated forms of Nrf2. Following treatment with LC or MG-132 in the presence or absence of tBHQ, HepG2 cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-Nrf2 antibodies and then analyzed by immunoblotting with an anti-ubiquitin monoclonal antibody. As shown in Fig. 4B, protein bands with slower mobility than Nrf2 were detected only in the lysates of cells treated with either LC or MG-132 (Fig. 4C, lanes 3 and 5). Treatment with tBHQ did not have any apparent effect on the accumulation of these slow-migrating protein bands (Fig. 4C, lanes 2, 4, and 6). Similar observations have been made in recent studies on the ubiquitination of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (32) and the beta 2-adrenergic receptor and beta -arrestin protein (33).


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Accumulation of Nrf2 induced by inhibitors of the ubiquitin-dependent proteasome. A, HepG2 cells were exposed to the proteasome inhibitor LC (5 µM) over a 24-h time-course period (as indicated), and total lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-Nrf2 and anti-GAPDH antibodies. The results were quantitated using a densitometer, and the Nrf2 values were plotted after normalization with those of GAPDH. The blot shown is a representative of three independent experiments with similar results. B, HepG2 cells were exposed to Me2SO (lane 1), tBHQ (50 µM, lane 2), LC (5 µM, lane 3), LC and tBHQ (lane 4), MG-132 (10 µM, lane 5), or MG-132 and tBHQ (lane 6) for 4 h, and total cell lysates were subject to immunoprecipitation with anti-Nrf2 (alpha -Nrf2) antibodies. The immunoprecipitated complexes were fractionated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with anti-ubiquitin (alpha -Ub) antibodies. The blot shown is a representative of two independent experiments.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Phosphorylation by MAPK/ERK pathway increases Nrf2 stability. A, HepG2 cells were exposed to solvent (Me2SO, lane 2), 50 µM tBHQ (lane 3), LC (lane 4), 10 µM MG-132 (lane 5), 20 nM OA (lane 6), OA and tBHQ (lane 7), 10 nM staurosporine (Stauro, lane 8), Stauro and tBHQ (lane 9) for 4 h, and total cell lysates were prepared and analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-Nrf2 antibodies. B, HepG2 cells were treated with Me2SO (lane 2), or 50 µM tBHQ (lane 3) for 4 h, 50 µM PD 98059 (lane 4) or 10 µM U 0126 (lane 5) for 1 h, and followed by tBHQ for 4 h, and total cell lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-Nrf2 and anti-GAPDH antibodies. TNT-Nrf2, in vitro translated Nrf2 as positive control. The asterisk (*) indicates a nonspecific, cross-reacting band. The results in A and B were quantitated using a densitometer, and the Nrf2 values were plotted after normalization with those of GAPDH. The blots shown are representatives of three independent experiments with similar results.

Transient transfection experiments were also performed to determine if the proteasome inhibitors can mimic ARE inducers such as tBHQ to elicit a transcriptional response through the ARE. As shown in Fig. 6, LC or MG-132 treatment of HepG2 cells transfected with the GSTA2 ARE-CAT reporter construct induced CAT activity ~3.5-fold over the basal level. Further treatment with tBHQ did not lead to higher CAT activity.


View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Activation of ARE-mediated reporter gene by the proteasome inhibitors and by okadaic acid. HepG2 cells transfected with the GSTA2 ARE-CAT reporter construct were treated with LC (5 µM), MG-132 (10 µM), OA (20 nM), or staurosporine (Stauro, 10 nM) in the presence or absence of tBHQ (50 µM) for 20 h. Cell lysates were prepared, and CAT assays were performed as described previously (15). The CAT activity from the lysate of cells exposed to only Me2SO was arbitrarily set at 1. The data represent the average of three independent transfection experiments.

Stabilization of Nrf2 Is Dependent on Phosphorylation by the MAPK Pathway-- Phosphorylation of Nrf2 by PKC caused by ARE inducers appears to promote its nuclear translocation (27). To determine if phosphorylation of Nrf2 also contributes to its stability, we employed OA, a protein phosphatase inhibitor that induces intracellular hyperphosphorylation (34). Treatment of HepG2 cells with OA resulted in an increase in the Nrf2 protein by ~2-fold as determined by immunoblot analysis (Fig. 5A) as well as a 2.5-fold induction of CAT activity from the GSTA2 ARE-CAT construct (Fig. 6). The level of Nrf2 (9.5-fold) as well as the CAT activity (4.5-fold) was increased further in cells co-treated with OA and tBHQ (Fig. 5A, and Fig. 6) as compared with those treated with tBHQ alone (6.2-fold and 3-fold, respectively). In contrast, treatment with the broad spectrum PKC inhibitor staurosporine did not affect the level of Nrf2 (Fig. 5A), although this inhibitor did attenuate the induction of CAT activity by tBHQ (Fig. 6). These data indicate that phosphorylation of Nrf2 by PKC may not be essential for its stability. However, cellular hyperphosphorylation induced by OA appears to have a positive effect on Nrf2 stability and transactivation activity.

It has been previously reported that the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway may be involved in the regulation of the ARE response (21, 22). We sought to determine if phosphorylation events mediated by this pathway may have a role in promoting Nrf2 stability. In this experiment, HepG2 cells were pretreated with PD 98059 or U 0126 for 1 h followed by tBHQ treatment for 4 h. The lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting with both anti-Nrf2 and anti-GAPDH antibodies. The results of this experiment show that both of these compounds attenuated the inducing effects of tBHQ on the Nrf2 protein level, with PD 98059 and U 0126 causing a reduction of ~60 and 50%, respectively (Fig. 5B). These data suggest a link between phosphorylation and Nrf2 stability and a positive effect from the MAPK/ERK pathway.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The expression of many antioxidant and Phase II drug-metabolizing enzymes is increased in cells during oxidative stress (35), and the induction process is primarily mediated by the transcription factor Nrf2 acting on the ARE present in the promoter of genes encoding these enzymes. The established mechanism of activation of the ARE-mediated pathway has been demonstrated to lead to the dissociation of Nrf2 from the cytoskeleton-anchored Keap1 protein, which results in its translocation into the nucleus to increase gene transcription (28, 36). Several recent studies have examined the association between these two proteins at the molecular levels, including potential sites involved in the interaction (28), the necessity for dimerization of Keap1 to associate with Nrf2 (37), and critical cysteine residues of Keap1 that become modified by electrophilic agents to induce the release of Nrf2 (38). Separately, phosphorylation of a serine residue in Nrf2 by PKC has been shown to interfere with its binding to Keap1 (29).

In the present study, we have examined other mechanisms involving Nrf2 that are important for ARE-driven transcription. We observed that the level of cellular Nrf2 increased in HepG2 cells treated with either tBHQ or beta -NF, two structurally diverse compounds that activate gene expression via the ARE (1, 2). The increase of cellular Nrf2 by beta -NF occurred at a later time point as compared with tBHQ. This delay is consistent with the observation that beta -NF must first be metabolized to a reactive intermediate by CYP1A1 to become an active inducer of the ARE response (2).

Our results suggest that the increase in the level of Nrf2 in response to tBHQ is mediated by a post-transcriptional mechanism, rather than an increase in Nrf2 mRNA levels. These findings are consistent with other studies that have demonstrated that Nrf2 mRNA levels are unaffected by various inducers of ARE activity (13, 39). A more recent study, however, reported that the expression of Nrf2 was increased in murine keratinocytes by 3H-1,2-dithiole-3-thione (D3T), but this effect was attributed to an increase in the rate of Nrf2 transcription (40). These results are contradictory to those observed in this and other studies and are possibly due to differences in the experimental procedures, cell types, and compounds being used. Our data also suggest that increased Nrf2 stability, rather than an increase in the rate of protein translation, is responsible for the higher level of Nrf2 observed in tBHQ- or beta -NF-treated cells. We have also obtained evidence demonstrating that the 26 S proteasome plays an important role in the regulation of the Nrf2 protein. Thus it appears that the steady-state level of Nrf2 is maintained by a precise balance between the rates of its synthesis and its degradation by the proteasome. We hypothesize that in response to oxidative stress Nrf2 would continue to be synthesized at a normal rate, but the rate of its degradation decreases such that the balance would now tip toward accumulation of the protein, ultimately leading to an enhanced transcriptional activity.

These data raise an important question as to the mechanism(s) that regulate Nrf2 stability in the cell. Since degradation by the 26 S proteasome requires prior ubiquitination of the substrate molecule, recognition and targeting of the Nrf2 protein by the ubiquitin ligases may represent the critical, rate-limiting step. As phosphorylation of Nrf2 was found to be promoted in cells treated with ARE inducers (27), it is possible that phosphorylation may also contribute to its stabilization, perhaps by rendering the protein inaccessible to the ubiquitin ligases. This type of mechanism is exemplified by the p53 transcription factor whose phosphorylation has been shown to reduce its affinity for the Mdm2 protein and therefore increase its stability (41-43). Indeed, our findings that both an accumulation of Nrf2 as well as an increase in ARE-dependent reporter gene activity were induced by OA in HepG2 cells support the hypothesis that phosphorylation does have an important role in the stability and transcriptional activity of Nrf2. Furthermore, using inhibitors of the MAPK/ERK pathway, it appears that this pathway may lead to phosphorylation of Nrf2 and its increased stability. These findings confirm previous reports implicating the MAPK/ERK pathway in the regulation of ARE-responsive genes (21, 22). Although PKC can phosphorylate Nrf2, these kinases did not seem to affect its stability. The treatment of cells with staurosporine does attenuate the induction of ARE-dependent reporter gene activity by tBHQ but had no effects on the Nrf2 protein level. Together, our data indicate that regulation of the Nrf2 activity may involve phosphorylation at multiple sites, each of which is associated with a particular function. Finally, it remains to be seen what role, if any, the PI3K/Akt pathway, which has also been implicated in regulation of ARE-responsive genes (24-26), may have on processes controlling the activation of Nrf2 activity. Inhibition of the PI3-kinase enzyme interfered with the inducing effects of tBHQ on a number of genes in IMR-32 neuroblastoma cells, one of which encodes Keap1 (44). The significance of the induction of Keap1 by tBHQ is not known but was suggested to possibly constitute a feedback mechanism to repress the activation of ARE-dependent genes and return their expression to basal level (44).

Thus the induction of ARE-dependent enzymes appears to be regulated by a coordinated process that controls the activation of Nrf2 activity at multiple levels, including its nuclear translocation, protein stability, and possibly feedback repression. Recent studies have begun to elucidate mechanisms governing its interaction with Keap1 and thus its movement across the nuclear envelop (29, 37, 38). Elucidation of mechanisms that mediate the increased stability of Nrf2 will require the identification of the specific protein kinase(s) involved as well as the site(s) of phosphorylation. Equally important is the identification of other components, such as those that mediate the interaction of Nrf2 with the proteasome proteolytic pathway. Together, such mechanistic data will provide insights into the various regulatory mechanisms involved in the induction of antioxidant and drug-metabolizing enzymes important for the protection of cells against oxidative damage caused by reactive oxygen species.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Schering-Plough Research Inst., 2015 Galloping Hill Rd., Kenilworth, NJ 07033. Tel.: 908-740-7567; Fax: 908-740-7514; E-mail: Cecil.Pickett@spcorp.com.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, November 22, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M207293200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: ARE, antioxidant response element; GST, glutathione S-transferase; GCS, glutamylcysteine synthetase; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; PKC, protein kinase C; tBHQ, tert-butylhydroquinone; beta -NF, beta -naphthoflavone; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; CHX, cycloheximide; LC, lactacystin; OA, okadaic acid; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; Nrf2, NF-E2-related factor 2; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyl transferase.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Rushmore, T. H., Morton, M. R., and Pickett, C. B. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 11632-11639[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Rushmore, T. H., and Pickett, C. B. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 14648-14653[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Rushmore, T. H., King, R. G., Paulson, K. E., and Pickett, C. B. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 3826-3830[Abstract]
4. Friling, R. S., Bensimon, A., Tichauer, Y., and Daniel, V. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 6258-6262[Abstract]
5. Favreau, L. V., and Pickett, C. B. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 4556-4561[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Favreau, L. V., and Pickett, C. B. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 24468-24474[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Li, Y., and Jaiswal, A. K. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 15097-15104[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Mulcahy, R. T., Wartman, M. A., Bailey, H., and Gipp, J. J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 7445-7454[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Moinova, H. R., and Mulcahy, R. T. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 14683-14689[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Inamdar, N. M., Ahn, Y. I., and Alam, J. (1996) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 221, 570-576[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Moi, P., Chan, K., Asunis, I., Cao, A., and Kan, Y. W. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 9926-9930[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Venugopal, R., and Jaiswal, A. K. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 14960-14965[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Wild, A. C., Moinova, H. R., and Mulcahy, R. T. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 33627-33636[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Alam, J., Stewart, D., Touchard, C., Boinapally, S., Choi, A. M. K., and Cook, J. L. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 26071-26078[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Nguyen, T., Huang, H.-C., and Pickett, C. B. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 15466-15473[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Itoh, K., Chiba, T., Takahashi, S., Ishii, T., Igarashi, K., Katoh, Y., Oyake, T., Hayashi, N., Satoh, K., Hatayama, I., Yamamoto, M., and Nabeshima, Y. I. (1997) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 236, 313-322[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. McMahon, M., Itoh, K., Yamamoto, M., Chanas, S. A., Henderson, C. J., McLellan, L. I., Wolf, C. R., Cavin, C., and Hayes, J. D. (2001) Cancer Res. 61, 3299-3307[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Chan, K., Han, X. D., and Kan, Y. W. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 4611-4616[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Enomoto, A., Itoh, K., Nagayoshi, E., Haruta, J., Kimura, T., O'Connor, T., Harada, T., and Yamamoto, M. (2001) Toxicol. Sci. 59, 169-177[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Ramos-Gomez, M., Kwak, M.-K., Dolan, P. M., Itoh, K., Yamamoto, M., Talalay, P., and Kensler, T. W. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 3410-3415[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Yu, R., Lei, W., Mandlejar, S., Weber, M. J., Der, C. J., Wu, J., and Kong, A.-N. T. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 27545-27552[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Yu, R., Chen, C., Mo, Y.-Y., Hebbar, V., Owuor, E. D., Tan, T.-H., and Kong, A.-N. T. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 39907-39913[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Zipper, L. M., and Mulcahy, R. T. (2000) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 278, 484-492[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Kang, K. W., Ryu, J. H., and Kim, S. G. (2000) Mol. Pharmacol. 58, 1017-1025[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Kang, K. W., Cho, M. K., Lee, C. H., and Kim, S. G. (2001) Mol. Pharmacol. 59, 1147-1156[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Lee, J.-M., Hanson, J. M., Chu, W. A., and Johnson, J. A. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 20011-20016[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Huang, H.-C., Nguyen, T., and Pickett, C. B. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97, 12475-12480[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Itoh, K., Wakabayashi, N., Katoh, Y., Ishii, T., Igarashi, K., Engel, J. D., and Yamamoto, M. (1999) Genes Dev. 13, 76-86[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Huang, H.-C., Nguyen, T., and Pickett, C. B. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 42769-42774[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. King, R. W., Deshaies, R. J., Peters, J., and Kirschner, M. W. (1996) Science 274, 1652-1659[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Whitmarsh, A. J., and Davis, R. J. (2000) Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 57, 1172-1183[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Ma, Q., and Baldwin, K. T. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 8432-8438[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Shenoy, S. K., McDonald, P. H., Kohout, T. A., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (2001) Science 294, 1307-1313[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Cohen, P., Holmes, C. F. B., and Tsukitani, Y. (1990) Trends Biochem. Sci. 15, 98-102[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Hayes, J. D., and McMahon, M. (2001) Cancer Lett. 174, 103-113[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Dhakshinamoorthy, S., and Jaiswal, A. K. (2001) Oncogene 20, 3906-3917[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Zipper, L. M., and Mulcahy, R. T. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 36544-36552[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Dinkova-Kostova, A. T., Holtzclaw, W. D., Cole, R. N., Itoh, K., Wakabayashi, N., Katoh, Y., Yamamoto, M., and Talalay, P. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99, 11908-11913[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Ishii, T., Itoh, K., Takahashi, S., Sato, H., Yanagawa, T., Katoh, Y., Bannai, S., and Yamamoto, M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 16023-16029[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Kwak, M.-K., Itoh, K., Yamamoto, M., and Kensler, T. W. (2002) Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 2883-2892[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Haupt, Y., Maya, R., Kazaz, A., and Oren, M. (1997) Nature 387, 296-299[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Kubbutat, M. H., Jones, S. N., and Vousden, K. H. (1997) Nature 387, 299-303[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Prives, C. (1998) Cell 95, 5-8[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Li, J., Lee, J.-M., and Johnson, J. A. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 388-394[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2003 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.