Actions and Interactions of Extracellular Potassium and Kainate on Expression of 13 gamma -Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptor Subunits in Cultured Mouse Cerebellar Granule Neurons*

A. Christine EngblomDagger §, Flemming F. Johansen, and Uffe KristiansenDagger ||

From the Dagger  Department of Pharmacology, Royal Danish School of Pharmacy, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark and  Laboratory of Neuropathology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark

Received for publication, January 17, 2003, and in revised form, March 4, 2003

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cerebellar granule neurons in culture are a popular model for studying neuronal signaling and development. Depolarizing concentrations of K+ are routinely used to enhance cell survival, and kainate is sometimes added to eliminate GABAergic neurons. We have investigated the effect of these measures on expression of mRNA for gamma -aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor alpha 1-6, beta 1-3, gamma 1-3, and delta  subunits in cultures of mouse cerebellar granule neurons grown for 7 or 12 days in vitro (DIV) using semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR. We detected mRNA for the alpha 1, alpha 2, alpha 5, alpha 6, beta 2, beta 3, gamma 2, and delta  subunits in all the cell cultures, but the expression levels of the alpha 5-, alpha 6-, and beta 2-subunit mRNAs were significantly dependent on the composition of the culture medium. Both an increase of the extracellular K+ concentration from 5 to 25 mM and the addition of 50 µM kainate immediately depolarized the neurons but prolonged exposure (7-8 DIV)-induced compensatory hyperpolarization. 25 mM K+ caused a shift from alpha 6 to alpha 5 expression measured at 7 and 12 DIV, which was mimicked by kainate in 12 DIV cultures. The expression of beta 2 was decreased by 25 mM K+ in 7 DIV cultures and by kainate in 12 DIV cultures. The effects on beta 2 expression could not be ascribed to depolarization. Alterations of alpha 6 mRNA expression were reflected in altered sensitivity to GABA and furosemide of the resulting receptors. Our study has shown that a depolarizing K+ concentration as well as kainate in the culture medium significantly disturbs maturation of GABAA receptor subunit expression.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The gamma -aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA)1 receptor is a transmitter-gated Cl- ion channel assembled from different subunits in a pentameric composition. In the mammalian central nervous system a large family of subunits exist that, based on homology, are grouped into types alpha 1-6, beta 1-3, gamma 1-3, delta , epsilon , and theta  (1-3). The GABAA receptor subunits are expressed in a region- and age-specific manner (4-9). The different subunit combinations exhibit distinct properties that presumably underlie a precise physiological role for each subtype (Refs. 10-18; for review, see Ref. 19). Knowledge of the distribution of different GABAA receptor subtypes, both anatomically and developmentally, is therefore essential for understanding the physiological actions of GABA and the pharmacological actions of drugs that act on different GABAA receptor subtypes.

Cerebellar granule neurons are used for studying neuronal signaling and development because they have a relatively simple morphology and receive most of their inhibitory input from one cell type (for review, see Ref. 20). When cultured in serum-based medium, cerebellar granule neurons express a wide range of receptors and develop stimulus-coupled glutamate release (21). In the developing cerebellum, granule neurons express GABAA receptor alpha 2-, alpha 3-, beta 3-, gamma 1-, and gamma 2-subunit genes (5). These subunits are replaced in the adult cerebellum where alpha 1, alpha 6, beta 2, beta 3, gamma 2, and delta  predominate (4, 7, 22). The alpha 6 subunit is expressed almost exclusively in cerebellar granule neurons, where it marks neuronal maturation. A similar development evidently occurs in cultures of rat cerebellar granule neurons (e.g. Refs. 23-25). It has been suggested that 45-59% of GABAA receptors in the cerebellum of the adult rodent contain alpha 6 subunits (25-28). The most predominant combinations are proposed to be alpha 1alpha 6beta 2/3gamma 2, alpha 1beta 2/3gamma 2, alpha 6beta 2/3gamma 2, alpha 1alpha 6beta 2/3delta , and alpha 6beta 2/3delta (25, 27, 29, 30); noteworthy is the finding that the delta  subunit is found exclusively in combination with alpha 6 subunits (26, 31).

It is well known that elevated extracellular K+ concentrations or other calcium-elevating stimuli promote long term survival of rat cerebellar granule neurons in dissociated cultures (21). The physiological extracellular K+ concentration is ~ 5 mM, but cerebellar granule neuronal cultures are often maintained in 25 mM K+ to enhance survival (21). This use of chronic depolarization is questionable, because it affects the subunit gene expression of neurotransmitter receptors and, hence, the receptor composition and function. More specifically, rat granule neurons do not correctly develop their AMPA or NMDA receptor subunit expression in 25 mM K+ (32-34). In addition, the K+ concentration affects GABAA receptor subunit expression in rat (35, 36) and mouse (37) cerebellar granule neurons. Kainate is sometimes used to eliminate GABAergic neurons from cultures of cerebellar granule neurons (38). As a glutamate receptor agonist, it causes depolarization (39), but its effect on GABAA receptor subunit expression is not as well described as that of K+.

The aim of this work was to investigate the effects of extracellular K+ and kainate on cell viability and on the expression of 13 different GABAA receptor subunit mRNAs in cultures of mouse cerebellar granule neurons. The role of membrane potential in mediating the effects of K+ and kainate was assessed by correlating the effects on membrane potential and on mRNA expression. Finally, the relative contribution of the alpha 6 subunit to receptor function was estimated from the sensitivity of the receptors to GABA and to the alpha 6 selective antagonist furosemide (11).

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Primary Cultures of Mouse Cerebellar Granule Cells-- Cerebellar granule neurons were prepared from 6-8-day-old NMRI mice (Taconic M&B) according to a procedure modified from Courtney et al. (40) and Schousboe et al. (38). Briefly, trypsin (0.25 mg/ml, Sigma)-dissociated and DNase (50 units/ml, Sigma)-treated cells were plated at ~300,000 cells/cm2 in 35-mm Petri dishes coated with poly-D-lysine (Sigma). Cells were cultured in Dulbecco's minimum essential medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen), 31 mM glucose, 0.2 mM glutamine (Sigma), 4 µg/liter insulin (Sigma), 7.3 µM p-aminobenzoic acid (Sigma), and 50 units/ml penicillin (LEO Pharma). As appropriate, the medium was further supplemented with 20 mM KCl (to a final K+ concentration of 25 mM) and/or 50 µM kainate (Sigma). Culture medium was replaced after ~24 h with the inclusion of 10 µM cytosine arabinoside (Sigma) to reduce non-neuronal proliferation; after this treatment the medium was not changed. The cells were cultured in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C. The cultures were used in experiments within 12 days in vitro (DIV).

Measurement of Cell Viability-- The amount of viable cells in the cerebellar granule neuron cultures was quantified using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay as described (41). 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide is reduced to formazan by cells that have functional mitochondria; this process has been shown to correlate well with cell viability (42). The cultures were tested at 7 and 12 DIV.

Semiquantitative Reverse Transcription-PCR-- Reverse transcription-PCR was performed as previously described (43). The cultures were tested at 7 and 12 DIV. Primers (Table I) for the GABAA receptor subunits alpha 1, alpha 2, alpha 3, alpha 4, alpha 5, alpha 6, beta 1, beta 2, beta 3, gamma 1, gamma 2, gamma 3, and delta  were used. Briefly, RNA was isolated with RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) after lysis of the cells, and the concentration and purification of RNA was measured on a spectrophotometer (Ultrospec4000, Pharmacia Biosciences). cDNA was synthesized using 0.25 µg of RNA, and 1 µl of the resulting mixture was used for PCR for each subunit. cDNA amplifications were performed in 42 cycles, and aliquots (15 of 100 µl in total) of the PCR products were taken from cycles 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, and 42. Relative intensity of the ethidium bromide-stained bands on gels were measured using computer-assisted image analysis and compared with the 400-bp band of the molecular weight marker (100 Base-Pair-Ladder, Amersham Biosciences) added in fixed amount for all gels. Because the efficiency of the PCR amplification is primer-dependent, the relative intensities could not be compared between different subunit mRNAs.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
The GABAA receptor subunits and the primer sequences for their mRNA

Electrophysiology-- Before recordings, the culture medium was exchanged for an extracellular recording solution (artificial balanced salt solution (ABSS)), and the Petri dish with cells was transferred to an inverted phase-contrast Zeiss Axiovert 10 microscope stage. The cells were constantly perfused with ABSS (0.5 ml/min) at room temperature from a gravity-fed 7-barrel perfusion pipette (List) ~100 µm from the recorded neuron. By switching application from one barrel to another, the extracellular solution surrounding the neuron was exchanged with a time constant of ~50 ms. Individual cerebellar granule neurons were approached with micropipettes of 3-5-megaohm resistance manufactured from 1.5-mm-outer-diameter glass (World Precision Instruments). Standard patch clamp technique (44) in current or voltage clamp mode was used to record from neurons in the whole-cell configuration using an EPC-9 amplifier (HEKA Elektronik). Whole-cell membrane currents and potentials were plotted on a low fidelity chart recorder during the experiment and stored on computer hard disk and video tape using a VR-100 digital data recorder (Instrutech).

For recordings of the membrane potentials with extracellular K+ concentration = 5 mM (physiological K+), the cells were perfused with ABSS composed of 138.5 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1.25 mM Na2HPO4, 2 mM MgSO4, 2 mM CaCl2, 10 mM glucose, and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.35. For recordings with extracellular K+ concentration = 25 mM (depolarizing K+) the concentration of NaCl was reduced to 118.5 mM, and the concentration of KCl was increased to 25 mM. Kainate was dissolved in ABSS to a final concentration of 50 µM, where indicated. The intrapipette solution contained 10 mM NaCl, 130 mM potassium gluconate, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 10 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgATP, and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.3. Initially the cells were perfused with "physiological" ABSS containing 5 mM K+ without kainate. The perfusion was then switched to ABSS with either 25 mM K+ or 50 µM kainate or both. After a new stable membrane potential was reached, the perfusion was switched back to physiological ABSS. Each of the depolarizing solutions was tested at least twice on each cell. Membrane potentials were corrected for liquid junction potentials.

In experiments addressing the GABA concentration-response relationships or furosemide sensitivities, the ABSS contained 140 mM NaCl, 3.5 mM KCl, 1.25 mM Na2HPO4, 2 mM MgSO4, 2 mM CaCl2, 10 mM glucose, and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.35. The intrapipette solution contained 140 mM KCl, 1mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 10 mM EGTA, 2mM MgATP, and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.3. The neurons were voltage-clamped at -60 mV. The high intracellular Cl- concentration shifted the Cl- reversal potential to ~0 mV and substantially increased the currents recorded at -60 mV. Series resistance was 65% compensated. GABA (Sigma) was dissolved in distilled water at a concentration at least 100× greater than that required for perfusion and diluted with ABSS. Furosemide (Sigma) was dissolved in Me2SO and diluted with ABSS; the content of Me2SO in the final solution was at most 0.1% and had no effect of its own on membrane current. Different concentrations of GABA were applied for 5 s at 1-min intervals. Furosemide was preapplied for 10 s immediately before the application of a premixed solution of GABA and furosemide. Between drug applications the cell was perfused with ABSS.

Membrane currents and potentials were analyzed using Pulse (HEKA Elektronik) and Igor Pro (Wavemetrics) software. Current responses were quantified by measuring the peak current during application of GABA or GABA plus furosemide. GABA concentration-response relationships were fitted to the equation,
I=<FR><NU>I<SUB><UP>max</UP></SUB><UP> × </UP>[<UP>GABA</UP>]<SUP>n</SUP></NU><DE><UP>EC</UP><SUP><UP>n</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>50</UP></SUB><UP> + </UP>[<UP>GABA</UP>]<SUP>n</SUP></DE></FR> (Eq. 1)
where I is the peak membrane current induced by the GABA concentration, [GABA], Imax is the maximum peak current that GABA can induce, EC50 is the GABA concentration eliciting 50% of Imax, and n is the Hill coefficient.

Statistics-- Data were described using mean and S.E. or 95% confidence intervals. Mean values were compared using either Student's t test or analysis of variance (ANOVA); when relevant, the Tukey test was used as a means of post-hoc multiple comparisons. Two-way ANOVA was used to separate the effects of two variables and determine their interaction. Probabilities (p) < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The term "occlusion" refers to situations where the effect due to simultaneous variation of two variables was smaller than the sum of the effects due to variation of each variable separately.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

K+ and Kainate Are Acutely Depolarizing, but Prolonged Exposure Induces Compensatory Hyperpolarization-- Fig. 1 shows the influence of the culture medium as well as the extracellular recording solution (ABSS) on the membrane potentials of the neurons. The same K+ and kainate concentrations were used for the culture media and extracellular recording solutions: 5 or 25 mM K+ and 0 or 50 µM kainate.


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Membrane potentials of cerebellar granule neurons depend on K+ and kainate concentrations in the culture media as well as in the extracellular recording solution. Each column represents the mean ± S.E. from 6-11 neurons. The effects of K+ and kainate were analyzed using two-way ANOVA. A, at 2-3 DIV the composition of the culture medium was without effect. In the extracellular recording solution both elevation of K+ (p < 0.001) and addition of kainate (p < 0.001) depolarized the membrane potential with total occlusion (p = 0.026). B, after 7-8 DIV a significant effect of the culture medium had emerged (p < 0.001) in addition to, but independent of, the effect of the extracellular recording solution (p < 0.001). In the culture medium both elevated K+ (p = 0.004) and kainate (p = 0.034) hyperpolarized the membrane potential without interaction. In the extracellular recording solution both elevation of K+ (p < 0.001) and kainate (p < 0.001) depolarized the membrane potential with partial occlusion (p < 0.001). In columns marked with the symbol # membrane potentials were measured in the presence of the same extracellular K+ and kainate concentrations as in the culture medium. For these, at 2-3 DIV elevation of K+ concentration significantly depolarized the membrane potential (p = 0.005), whereas the kainate effect was not significant. At 7-8 DIV both K+ (p < 0.001) and kainate (p < 0.001) were significantly depolarizing and totally occluding (p < 0.001). The horizontal line at -42 mV shows the equilibrium potential for K+ with the extracellular concentration at 25 mM.

A two-way ANOVA was used to estimate the effects of 1) culture medium and 2) extracellular recording solution on the membrane potential. At 2-3 DIV the membrane potential was independent of the culture medium but significantly dependent on the extracellular recording solution (p = 0.002). This dependence was further analyzed with a two-way ANOVA of the effects of 1) K+ concentration and 2) kainate concentration in the extracellular recording solution. Both K+ and kainate had highly significant depolarizing effects (p < 0.001 for both) and a significant interaction (p = 0.026), suggesting that the depolarizing effect of simultaneously increasing both K+ or kainate concentrations to 25 mM and 50 µM, respectively, was not as great as the sum of the depolarizations caused by increasing K+ or kainate separately (occlusion). Indeed, the combined effect of K+ and kainate did not differ significantly from the individual effects (total occlusion).

After 7-8 DIV both culture medium and extracellular recording solution showed significant effects (p < 0.001 for both) without interaction, i.e. their effects were additive (two-way ANOVA). The effect of culture medium was further analyzed with two-way ANOVA. Increased K+ (p = 0.004) or kainate (p = 0.034) in the culture medium significantly hyperpolarized the membrane potentials without interaction. The effect of recording solution was also further analyzed. After 7-8 DIV (as at 2-3 DIV), both increased K+ (p < 0.001) and kainate (p < 0.001) concentrations were significantly depolarizing. The combined effect of increased K+ and kainate concentration was smaller than the sum of the individual effects (p < 0.001) but larger than any of the individual effects (p < 0.001, Tukey test), which were not significantly different. Thus, at this point the effects of K+ and kainate concentrations in the extracellular recording solution were only partially occluding.

In conclusion, the immediate effects of increasing either K+ (from 5 to 25 mM) or the kainate concentrations (from 0 to 50 µM) in the extracellular recording solution were depolarizations of similar magnitude that were occluding and independent of the culture medium. Prolonged exposure to high K+ or kainate concentrations in the culture medium gave rise to hyperpolarization relative to cells grown in a physiological K+ concentration without kainate. This suggests that the neurons develop a compensatory hyperpolarizing mechanism when exposed to depolarizing conditions for an extended period.

The membrane potentials of neurons in the different culture media may influence mRNA expression. These membrane potentials were estimated from measurements in extracellular recording solution with the same K+ and kainate concentration as in the culture medium (Fig. 1, columns marked with a number sign). At 2-3 DIV elevated K+ concentration significantly depolarized the membrane potential (two-way ANOVA, p = 0.005); on the other hand, the kainate effect was not significant. After 7-8 DIV both K+ (p < 0.001) and kainate (p < 0.001) were significantly depolarizing, but their combined effect was smaller than the sum of the effects of increasing K+ or kainate separately (two-way ANOVA, p < 0.001); moreover, the combined effect was not significantly larger than the individual effects (total occlusion, Tukey test).

No spontaneous synaptic potentials or currents were observed in any of the recorded neurons at 2-3 or 7-8 DIV. In addition, no action potentials were observed, even after depolarizations were induced with K+ or kainate.

Kainate as Well as Depolarizing K+, Increase Cell Viability-- The survival of mouse cerebellar granule neurons in culture was strongly dependent on the concentration of K+ in the culture medium as indicated by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay (Fig. 2). 25 mM K+ significantly (p < 0.001) increased the viability of mouse cerebellar granule neurons in culture regardless of the presence or absence of kainate both at 7 and 12 DIV. At 7 DIV kainate significantly (p < 0.01) increased cell viability in cultures grown in 5 mM but not in 25 mM K+, indicating that the effects of K+ and kainate on viability were not additive. The effect of kainate on cell viability was not detectable after 12 DIV.


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Viability of mouse cerebellar granule neurons cultured in different media for 7 and 12 DIV. The respective culture media are indicated below the columns. Cerebellar granule neurons cultured in 25 mM K+ without kainate was set to 100% viability at 7 DIV. Each column represents the mean ± S.E. of 10 cultures from independent batches. Cultures grown in 5 mM K+ showed significantly (***, p < 0.001) lower viability than cultures grown in 25 mM K+. Cultures grown for 7 DIV in 5 mM K+ in the absence of kainate showed significantly (p < 0.01) lower viability than cultures grown in 5 mM K+ in the presence of kainate.

Depolarizing K+ Causes a Shift of mRNA Expression from alpha 6 to alpha 5, Which Is Mimicked by Kainate in 12 DIV Cultures-- Of the six GABAA receptor alpha  subunit mRNAs tested for, the alpha 1, alpha 2, alpha 5, and alpha 6 mRNAs were expressed in detectable amounts, whereas alpha 3 mRNA and alpha 4 mRNA could not be detected.

The level of alpha 5 mRNA was significantly affected by K+ and kainate (Fig. 3). At 7 DIV alpha 5 expression was enhanced with 25 mM K+ in the culture medium relative to 5 mM K+ (p < 0.001). At 12 DIV both high K+ (p < 0.01) and kainate (p < 0.01) enhanced the expression of alpha 5 to similar levels, but the combination of K+ and kainate did not further increase alpha 5.


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Expression of mRNA for the alpha 5, alpha 6, and beta 2 GABAA receptor subunits depends on the concentrations of K+ and kainate in the culture medium. The amount of amplified mRNA is shown as a function of the number of PCR cycles. Band intensities are expressed relative to those from a fixed amount of molecular weight marker. Each symbol represents the mean ± S.E. of three cultures from independent batches. The significance levels of the differences achieved by varying the K+ and kainate concentrations as well as of their interaction are indicated below each number of PCR cycles (two-way ANOVA; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001). Interactions could only be properly estimated when at least three of the four intensities for a given number of PCR cycles were above the detection limit. Significance values for lower numbers of cycles are therefore shown in parentheses.

The alpha 6 mRNA was reciprocally affected (Fig. 3). At 7 DIV expression was significantly decreased in 25 mM K+ compared with 5 mM K+ (p < 0.001). At 12 DIV both high K+ (p < 0.05) and kainate (p < 0.05) inhibited alpha 6 expression to the same extent and with additive effects. The expression of alpha 1 and alpha 2 mRNA was not significantly affected by the concentration of K+ or kainate in the culture media (results not shown).

Depolarizing K+ and Kainate Specifically Decrease Expression of the beta 2 Subunit mRNA-- Of the three GABAA receptor beta  subunit mRNAs studied, the beta 2 and beta 3 were expressed in significant quantities, whereas expression of beta 1 was not detected. Elevation of the extracellular K+ concentration to 25 mM significantly (p < 0.001) decreased the expression of beta 2 mRNA in 7 DIV but not in 12 DIV cultures (Fig. 3). Kainate had no effect on neurons cultured for 7 days, but after 12 DIV it significantly (p < 0.05) decreased the expression of beta 2 independently of the K+ concentration. Expression of beta 3 mRNA was not significantly affected by increased K+ or the addition of kainate (results not shown).

Neither Kainate nor the K+ Concentration Affects the Expression of gamma  or delta  Subunit mRNA-- Of the three GABAA receptor gamma  subunits, only gamma 2 was detected. The delta  subunit mRNA was also found in significant amounts. Neither 25 mM K+ nor kainate had a significant effect on expression of gamma 2 mRNA or delta  mRNA (results not shown).

The GABA Concentration-Response Relationship Is Influenced by K+ in the Culture Medium-- To investigate whether differences in mRNA expression between cultures were reflected in the functional properties of the derived membrane-bound receptors, we determined GABA concentration-response relationships resulting from the different culture conditions (Fig. 4). The EC50 values and Hill coefficients are listed in Table II. Neurons cultured for 10-12 DIV in 5 mM K+ without kainate had a significantly lower EC50 value than neurons cultured in 25 mM K+ without kainate (p = 0.005). The Hill coefficients were not significantly different from each other.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Concentration-response relationships for GABA-induced peak currents in neurons grown in different culture media for 10-12 DIV. Peak currents were normalized to the peak current of 2 mM GABA in each cell and shown as the means ± S.E. (n = 19-29 neurons). The line graphs result from non-linear regression analysis of the concentration-response relationships, and the corresponding EC50 values and Hill coefficients are summarized in Table II.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Characteristics of GABA-induced currents in cerebellar granule neurons cultured in different media
The values were estimated by non-linear regression analyses of the concentration-response relationships for GABA-induced peak currents shown in Fig. 4. Numbers in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals for n = 19-29 neurons tested/culture medium.

Furosemide Inhibition of GABA-induced Currents Is Influenced by Both K+ and Kainate in the Culture Medium-- Furosemide has been shown to be a specific antagonist at GABAA receptors containing alpha 6 subunits (11). To estimate the relative contribution of alpha 6-containing receptors we tested the sensitivity of GABA-induced currents to inhibition by 100 µM furosemide in 10-11 DIV neurons (Fig. 5). Both culture conditions (p < 0.001) and GABA concentration (p = 0.012) affected furosemide inhibition without significant interaction (two-way ANOVA). Thus, furosemide inhibition decreases with increasing GABA concentration and response levels. Because the response levels obtained with 10 and 30 µM GABA were similar for cells grown in 25 mM K+, with or without kainate and in 5 mM K+ with kainate (Fig. 4, Table II), the furosemide inhibition was directly comparable for these cells. For 5 mM K+ without kainate, the response levels were higher; this would have a tendency to decrease the observed inhibition. Yet, this group of cells was the most sensitive to inhibition by furosemide.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Furosemide inhibition of GABA-induced peak currents in mouse cerebellar granule neurons cultured in different media for 10-11 DIV. A, representative current traces of the inhibitory effect of furosemide (100 µM) on peak currents induced by 10 µM GABA in neurons cultured in 25 mM K+ with 50 µM kainate, 25 mM K+ without kainate, 5 mM K+ with 50 µM kainate, and 5 mM K+ without kainate, respectively. The increased current variation in the beginning of the furosemide-modulated traces was caused by transient voltage pulses used to monitor cell membrane conductance and capacitance. These pulses were suspended ~5 s before GABA application. B, each column represents the means ± S.E. (n = 4-14 neurons) for the inhibition of GABA-gated peak currents by 100 µM furosemide. The respective culture media are indicated below the columns. The asterisks denote the significance levels of the inhibition (*, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001). The two GABA concentrations employed, 10 and 30 µM, corresponds to the following response levels for each culture medium: 25 mM K+ with 50 µM kainate, 16 and 36%; 25 mM K+ without kainate, 17 and 34%; 5 mM K+ with 50 µM kainate, 18 and 37%; 5 mM K+ without kainate, 28 and 47% (calculated from the parameters in Table I).

At 10 µM GABA both K+ (p < 0.001) and kainate (p = 0.019) had negative effects on the furosemide sensitivity (two-way ANOVA). For cells cultured in 5 mM K+ without kainate the control response level was higher (28%) than that of other cells (16-18%). If cells cultured in 5 mM K+ without kainate had been tested at the same response level the measured furosemide inhibition would have been enhanced and, thus, would strengthen the observed significance of the K+ and kainate effects. For 30 µM GABA, only the effect of K+ was found to be significant, but again, significance levels were probably underestimated because neurons cultured in 5 mM K+ without kainate were tested on a higher response level than the other neurons.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Depolarizing Effects of K+ and Kainate-- Increased extracellular K+ concentration as well as the addition of kainate to the extracellular medium gives rise to depolarization. An increased extracellular K+ concentration inhibits and potentially reverses outward K+ membrane currents leading directly to depolarization. Assuming an intracellular K+ concentration of 130 mM as in the intrapipette solutions, increasing the extracellular K+ concentration from 5 to 25 mM K+ switches the equilibrium potential for K+ , EK+, from -84 mV to -42 mV (45). The role of kainate is more complex. Kainate activates a subset of ionotropic glutamate receptors (AMPA as well as kainate receptors) giving rise to increased membrane permeability of Na+ and K+ (and for some AMPA receptors also Ca2+), resulting in membrane depolarization (39). Whether induced by increased extracellular K+ concentration or by kainate, depolarization opens voltage-gated Na+, K+, and Ca2+ channels, further increasing membrane permeability of Na+ and K+ and eliciting influx of Ca2+. We have analyzed the effects of increased K+ and kainate on membrane potential in order to correlate these with cell viability and mRNA expression.

The observed effects of increasing the extracellular concentration of K+ from 5 to 25 mM or adding 50 µM kainate to the extracellular medium are 2-fold. That is, the acute effects of both are depolarizations of similar magnitude that are mutually occluding and independent of the preceding culture conditions. Prolonged exposure to elevated K+ or kainate in the culture medium induces compensatory hyperpolarizing mechanisms; in this respect the effects of K+ and kainate are additive. Depolarization and compensatory hyperpolarization in concert determine the membrane potentials in the culture media.

The mutual occlusion of the depolarizations induced by increased K+ concentration and kainate in the extracellular recording solution is predicted by the Goldman equation (45). This equation also states that the greater the concentration and membrane permeability of a particular ionic species, the greater will be its role in determining the membrane potential (45). From Fig. 1 it is apparent that, with 25 mM K+ and no kainate in the extracellular recording solution, the membrane potential is, indeed, close to the EK+. An effect of depolarizing K+ concentrations on expression of AMPA receptor subunits has been reported (46) that might influence the depolarizing ability of kainate. Because we did not observe any interaction between the composition of the culture medium and the depolarizations induced when adding kainate to the extracellular recording solution, such an effect was not important in our experiments.

How does this correlate with cell viability and mRNA expression? This question is addressed in the following paragraphs. The interpretation is complicated by the fact that the measurements of membrane potentials are made at two time points, but the derived effects (viability and mRNA expression) are influenced by the membrane potential experienced by the cell throughout the culture period and possibly with some delay.

Effect of Depolarizing K+ and Kainate on Cell Viability-- During cerebellar development, excess granule neurons are produced and subsequently lost via apoptosis (47). Also in culture, a proportion of the rat cerebellar granule neurons die relatively soon. This apoptotic cell death is prevented or reduced if the extracellular K+ concentration is elevated to depolarizing concentrations (21). Our results show, in conflict with an earlier study (48), that also mouse cerebellar granule neurons survive significantly better when grown in a depolarizing than in a physiological K+ concentration. Depolarizing concentrations of K+ have been suggested to promote survival of cerebellar granule neurons in dissociated cultures by increasing the intracellular Ca2+ concentration via L-type voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (21).

In the developing brain, excitatory amino acids appear to exert trophic effects. NMDA has been shown to reduce apoptotic cell death in rat cerebellar granule neuron cultures by stimulating brain-derived neurotrophic factor (49). In cultures of rat cortical neurons kainate has been reported to elevate intracellular calcium, presumably in part via G protein activation, leading to enhanced nerve growth factor-mediated increase in cell viability (50). Significant neurotoxicity of kainate was not seen before 14 DIV (50). In the present study, kainate increased the viability of mouse cerebellar granule neurons cultured in physiological but not depolarizing K+ at 7 DIV. In 12 DIV cultures no effect of kainate on viability was detected. This profile seems not to correlate with kainate depolarization, which increased from 2-3 DIV to 7-8 DIV. It is possible that depolarization decreased again between 8 and 12 DIV or that a neurotoxic effect of kainate developed and counteracted the positive effect on cell viability. Alternatively, depolarization may not be a main mediator of the effect of kainate on cell viability.

Effect of Depolarizing K+ and Kainate on the Expression of GABAA Receptor Subunit mRNA-- The present study provides, for the first time, a simultaneous semi-quantitative analysis of the expression of 13 of the main mammalian GABAA receptor subunit mRNAs (alpha 1-6, beta 1-3, gamma 1-3, and delta ) in cultured mouse cerebellar granule neurons. The GABAA receptor subunit mRNA species that were detected in this study (alpha 1, alpha 2, alpha 5, alpha 6, beta 2, beta 3, gamma 2, delta ) are generally in good agreement with earlier studies of rat cerebellar granule neurons in vivo (7, 20) and in vitro (20, 36). Most importantly, our results show that the expression of some receptor subunit mRNAs (alpha 5, alpha 6, beta 2) is strongly dependent on culture conditions.

Depolarizing K+ and Kainate Hinders Maturation of alpha  Subunit Expression-- Our results demonstrate that mouse cerebellar granule neuron cultures maintained in depolarizing K+ express the alpha 5 subunit as a substitute for alpha 6, the latter prominent in cultures grown in physiological K+. At 12 DIV the effect of high K+ is mimicked by kainate in the culture medium, occluding the effect of K+ on alpha 5 mRNA. Although kainate is significantly depolarizing already at 7-8 DIV (and maybe earlier), the changes of mRNA expression are likely to be delayed relative to changes in membrane potential. Thus, on this basis, it is feasible that the reciprocal changes in alpha 5 and alpha 6 mRNA expression are mediated more or less by differences in membrane potential.

The alpha 5 subunit has not been found (4, 26, 27) or found in very low levels (single cell bodies) (7) in rat cerebellum in vivo. In rat cerebellar granule neurons cultured in 12.5 or 25 mM K+, however, alpha 5 subunit mRNA has been found (24, 35). During development of the rat central nervous system, the alpha 5 gene expression in particular seems to undergo a prominent peak in the early brain (5, 6), i.e. the expression of the alpha 5 gene might, in some brain areas, indicate undeveloped neurons. This is opposite to the alpha 6 subunit, which is reported to mark maturation of cerebellar granule neurons in vivo (5, 7, 22).

Several studies show that the level of the alpha 6 subunit mRNA and protein increases during the development of rat cerebellar granule neurons cultured in 25 mM K+ (e.g. Refs. 23, 24, and 51). Depolarizing K+ concentrations do not diminish the alpha 6 level (35). Actually, one study shows that alpha 6 expression is maintained by depolarizing K+ (36).

In contrast to this but in agreement with the present study, cultures of mouse cerebellar granule neurons grown in 25 mM K+ for 11-15 DIV have been shown not to express the alpha 6 gene, whereas cultures grown for the same period in 5 mM K+ did (37). These results suggest a species-specific difference regarding regulation of alpha 6 expression, which, however, may not apply to alpha 5 subunit expression. In accordance with our results for mouse cerebellar granule neurons, Harris et al. (35) find that in rat granule neurons the level of alpha 5 mRNA was higher after 5 DIV in 25 mM K+ than in 12.5 mM K+.

In the present study, the effect of K+ on alpha 5 and alpha 6 expression was mimicked by kainate at 12 DIV but not 7 DIV. To our knowledge, no AMPA or kainate receptor-mediated effects on alpha 5 expression in mouse or rat cerebellar granule neurons have been reported. The alpha 6 gene expression in rat cerebellar granule neurons has been found to be increased by glutamate. This effect was not sensitive to the NMDA receptor antagonist MK801 ((5R,10S)-(+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5,10-imine), suggesting involvement of AMPA/kainate and/or metabotropic glutamate receptors (35). In light of the proposed species-specific difference it may not be surprising that we found the opposite effect on alpha 6 expression when using kainate, but this could also be due to activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors by glutamate in the rat experiments.

The Effect on beta 2 Subunit Expression Does Not Correlate with Membrane Potential-- Compared with the alpha 5 and alpha 6 subunits the effects of K+ and kainate on beta 2 mRNA expression showed a very different pattern; at 7 DIV only change of K+ concentration was effective, whereas at 12 DIV only kainate had a weak effect. As for alpha 5 and alpha 6 mRNA, the effect of increased K+ at 7 DIV could potentially be due to depolarization, but because the K+ effect had vanished after 12 DIV we can postulate that either the mechanism had changed or it was never mediated through membrane potential. The lack of K+ effect after 12 DIV excludes the possibility that the kainate effect was mediated by depolarization. If expression of beta 2 mRNA is influenced by membrane potential at all, the effect seems to be transient. To our knowledge, there are no reports on the effect of kainate on the expression of GABAA receptor beta  subunits.

delta mRNA Expression-- Interestingly, it has been reported that rat cerebellar granule neurons show very low expression of delta  mRNA when cultured in 5 mM K+. However, delta  mRNA expression increases significantly in culture medium with 25 mM K+- or in Mg2+-free medium containing NMDA (52). As for alpha 6 mRNA, depolarizing medium is important for maintenance of delta  mRNA expression (36). The lack of effect of depolarization on delta  mRNA expression in mouse cerebellar granule neurons found in the present study could indicate a species difference in regulation of expression of the delta  subunit, although it could also be due to differences in culture conditions.

GABA Sensitivity and Inhibition by Furosemide Reflect the alpha 6 mRNA Level-- The presence of alpha 6 subunit in the GABAA receptor complex has functional implications with regard to GABA and furosemide sensitivity. Provided that a proportion of the alpha 6 mRNA is normally translated into protein and incorporated into receptor complexes in the cell membrane, a correlation between mRNA expression and these functional properties would be expected.

Recombinant expression of alpha 1beta 2gamma 2, alpha 6beta 2gamma , and alpha 1alpha 6beta 2gamma 2 combinations in human embryonic kidney 293 cells (24) and oocytes (30) have demonstrated a higher EC50 value for GABA in the alpha 1alpha 6beta 2gamma 2 combination (34 and 107 µM, respectively) than in the alpha 1beta 2gamma 2 (14 and 41 µM, respectively) and alpha 6beta 2gamma 2 (2 and 6.7 µM, respectively) combinations. A relatively modest expression of alpha 6 subunit would probably result primarily in alpha 1alpha 6beta 2gamma 2 receptors, whereas a relatively high level of alpha 6 would favor alpha 6beta 2gamma 2 receptors with high sensitivity to GABA. In agreement with this we found that only the neurons with the highest level of alpha 6 mRNA expression, namely those cultured in physiological K+ concentration without kainate, differed with regard to GABA sensitivity. These neurons had the lowest EC50, e.g. significantly lower than neurons grown in 25 mM K+ (Table II, Fig. 4).

Sigel and Baur (30) show that oocytes expressing the alpha 1alpha 6beta 2gamma 2 combination with regard to furosemide inhibition were more like the alpha 6beta 2gamma 2 combination. Furthermore, it was possible to gradually vary the IC50 for furosemide between the values for the alpha 1beta 2gamma 2 and the alpha 6beta 2gamma 2 combination by adjusting the alpha 1/alpha 6 cDNA ratio. These observations suggest that furosemide inhibition is a more sensitive indicator of alpha 6 protein in the receptors than GABA EC50. In agreement with this notion we found that furosemide inhibition at 10-11 DIV was significantly dependent on both K+ and kainate; this was also the case for alpha 6 mRNA expression at 12 DIV. In addition, the rank order of alpha 6 mRNA expression at 12 DIV and furosemide inhibition is in good agreement; that is, 5 mM K+ without kainate > 5 mM K+ with kainate > 25 mM K+ without kainate > 25 mM K+ with kainate. The kainate effect on alpha 6 expression was not significant at 7 DIV but increased to a significant level between 7 and 12 DIV. Thus, the functional properties of the GABAA receptors at 10-11 DIV seem to be in accordance with development of mRNA levels from 7 to 12 DIV.

Our Cerebellar Granule Neurons Were Electrically Silent-- Mellor et al. (37) report spontaneous miniature synaptic currents in mouse cerebellar granule neurons cultured and recorded in 5 mM K+, but not in 25 mM K+, at 15 DIV. Action potentials were also reported subsequent to adequate depolarization, but for neurons cultured and recorded in 25 mM K+, an initial hyperpolarizing current injection was required to reactivate the inactivated Na+ channels. In contrast, we did not observe spontaneous synaptic potentials or action potentials in any of the recorded neurons at 2-3 or 7-8 DIV. Because the membrane potentials in our neurons cultured and recorded in 5 mM K+ without kainate were more negative (-56 ± 3 mV at 2-3 DIV and -56 ± 1 mV at 7-8 DIV) than those of Mellor et al. (37) (-50 ± 2 mV at 15 DIV), inactivation of voltage-gated Na+ channels is not likely. The most probable reason for the lack of electrical activity is that necessary features such as synapses and high density of voltage-gated Na+ channels might be less developed at 7-8 DIV.

Concluding Remarks-- Both a depolarizing K+ concentration and kainate in the culture medium have the potential to enhance survival of mouse cerebellar granule neurons, but this happens at the expense of maturation of the GABAA receptor subunit expression. This is normally not desirable, but with sufficient knowledge of the effects of K+ and kainate these parameters may perhaps be exploited to adjust the subunit expression in a preferred direction. Species-specific effects on expression of some subunits make extrapolation from one species to another difficult. The actions of extracellular K+ and kainate described here can probably in part be attributed to alterations of the membrane potential. To clarify the exact mechanism of action, more detailed experiments employing subtype-specific glutamate receptor antagonists and Ca2+ channel blockers are required.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Gunilla Steven for excellent technical assistance.

    Note Added in Proof

After acceptance of the present manuscript, we learned that J. H. Ives et al. found a decreased GABAA receptor alpha 1, alpha 6, beta 2 and an increased beta 3 subunit expression when mouse cerebellar granule neurons were cultured in 25 mM K+ (Ives, J. H., Drewery, D. L., and Thompson, C. L. (2002) Neuropharmacol. 43, 715-725).

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by the Alfred Benzon Foundation (to A. C. E.), Danish Medical Research Council Grant 22-01-0291 (to U. K.), the Academy of Finland (to A. C. E.), The Research Institute of the Åbo Akademi Foundation (to A. C. E.), Gustaf Packalén Memorial Foundation (to A. C. E.), the Foundation for Swedish Culture in Finland (to A. C. E.), and the Maud Kuistila Memorial Foundation (to A. C. E.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Present address: Dept. of Biology, Åbo Akademi University, Åbo 20520, Finland.

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology, Royal Danish School of Pharmacy, 2 Universitetsparken, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. Tel.: 45-35306381; Fax: 45-35306020; E-mail: uk@dfh.dk.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 5, 2003, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M300548200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: GABAA, gamma -aminobutyric acid type A; DIV, days in vitro; AMPA, 3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid; NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate; ABSS, artificial balanced salt solution; EC50, concentration eliciting 50% of the maximum current; ANOVA, analysis of variance; EK+, equilibrium potential for K+.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Barnard, E. A., Skolnick, P., Olsen, R. W., Mohler, H., Sieghart, W., Biggio, G., Braestrup, C., Bateson, A. N., and Langer, S. Z. (1998) Pharmacol. Rev. 50, 291-313[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Bonnert, T. P., McKernan, R. M., Farrar, S., Le Bourdellès, B., Heavens, R. P., Smith, D. W., Hewson, L., Rigby, M. R., Sirinathsinghji, D. J. S., Brown, N., Wafford, K. A., and Whiting, P. J. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 9891-9896[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Korpi, E. R., Gründer, G., and Lüddens, H. (2002) Prog. Neurobiol. 67, 113-159[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Laurie, D. J., Seeburg, P. H., and Wisden, W. (1992) J. Neurosci. 12, 1063-1076[Abstract]
5. Laurie, D. J., Wisden, W., and Seeburg, P. H. (1992) J. Neurosci. 12, 4151-4172[Abstract]
6. Poulter, M. O., Barker, J. L., O'Carroll, A. M., Lolait, S. J., and Mahan, L. C. (1992) J. Neurosci. 12, 2888-2900[Abstract]
7. Pirker, S., Schwarzer, C., Wieselthaler, A., Sieghart, W., and Sperk, G. (2000) Neuroscience 101, 815-850[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Sinkkonen, S. T., Hanna, M. C., Kirkness, E. F., and Korpi, E. R. (2000) J. Neurosci. 20, 3588-3595[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Brooks-Kayal, A. R., Shumate, M. D., Jin, H., Rikhter, T. Y., Kelly, M. E., and Coulter, D. A. (2001) J. Neurochem. 77, 1266-1278[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Verdoorn, T. A. (1994) Mol. Pharmacol. 45, 475-480[Abstract]
11. Korpi, E. R., Kuner, T., Seeburg, P. H., and Lüddens, H. (1995) Mol. Pharmacol. 47, 283-289[Abstract]
12. Sieghart, W. (1995) Pharmacol. Rev. 47, 181-234[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Darlison, M. G., and Albrecht, B. E. (1995) Semin. Neurosci. 7, 115-126[CrossRef]
14. McKernan, R., and Whiting, P. (1996) Trends Neurosci. 19, 139-143[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Saxena, N. C., and Macdonald, R. L. (1996) Mol. Pharmacol. 49, 567-579[Abstract]
16. Sieghart, W., Fuchs, K., Tretter, V., Ebert, V., Jechlinger, M., Höger, H., and Adamiker, D. (1999) Neurochem. Int. 34, 379-385[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Alsbo, C. W., Kristiansen, U., Moller, F., Hansen, S. L., and Johansen, F. F. (2001) Eur. J. Neurosci. 13, 1673-1682[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Hansen, S. L., Ebert, B., Fjalland, B., and Kristiansen, U. (2001) Br. J. Pharmacol. 133, 539-549[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Rudolph, U., Crestani, F., and Möhler, H. (2001) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 22, 188-194[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Wisden, W., Korpi, E. R., and Bahn, S. (1996) Neuropharmacology 35, 1139-1160[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Gallo, V., Kingsbury, A., Balazs, R., and Jorgensen, O. S. (1987) J. Neurosci. 7, 2203-2213[Abstract]
22. Montpied, P., Yan, G. M., Paul, S. M., and Morrow, A. L. (1998) Dev. Neurosci. 20, 74-82[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Thompson, C. L., and Stephenson, F. A. (1994) J. Neurochem. 52, 2037-2044
24. Mathews, G. C., Bolos-Sy, A. M., Holland, K. D., Isenberg, K. E., Covey, D. F., Ferrendelli, J. A., and Rothman, S. M. (1994) Neuron 13, 149-158[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Caruncho, H. J., Puia, G., Mohler, H., and Costa, E. (1995) Neuroscience 67, 583-593[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Quirk, K., Gillar, N. P., Ragan, C. I., Whiting, P. J., and McKernan, R. M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 16020-16028[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Jechlinger, M., Pelz, R., Tretter, V., Klausberger, T., and Sieghart, W. (1998) J. Neurosci. 18, 2449-2457[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Nusser, Z., Ahmad, Z., Tretter, V., Fuchs, K., Wisden, W., Sieghart, W., and Somogyi, P. (1999) Eur. J. Neurosci. 11, 1685-1697[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Pollard, S., Thompson, C. L., and Stephenson, F. A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 21285-21290[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Sigel, E., and Baur, R. (2000) J. Neurochem. 74, 2590-2596[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Jones, A., Korpi, E. R., McKernan, R. M., Pelz, R., Nusser, Z., Mäkelä, R., and Mellor, J. R. (1997) J. Neurosci. 17, 1350-1362[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Bessho, Y., Nawa, H., and Nakanishi, S. (1994) Neuron 12, 87-95[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Hack, N. J., Sluiter, A. A., and Balázs, R. (1995) Dev. Brain Res. 87, 55-61[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Vallano, M. L., Lambolez, B., Audinat, E., and Rossier, J. (1996) J. Neurosci. 16, 631-639[Abstract]
35. Harris, B. T., Costa, E., and Grayson, D. R. (1995) Mol. Brain.. Res. 28, 338-342[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Gault, L. M., and Siegel, R. E. (1997) J. Neurosci. 17, 2391-2399[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Mellor, J. R., Merlo, D., Jones, A., Wisden, W., and Randall, A. D. (1998) J. Neurosci. 18, 2822-2833[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Schousboe, A., Meier, E., Drejer, J., and Hertz, L. (1989) in A Dissection and Tissue Culture Manual of the Nervous System (Shahar, A. , de Vellis, J. , Vernadakis, A. , and Haber, B., eds) , pp. 203-206, Alan R. Liss, New York
39. Dingledine, R., Borges, K., Bowie, D., and Traynelis, S. F. (1999) Pharmacol. Rev. 51, 7-61[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Courtney, M. J., Åkerman, K. E. O., and Coffey, E. T. (1997) J. Neurosci. 17, 4201-4211[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Jensen, J. B., Schousboe, A., and Pickering, D. S. (1998) Neurochem. Int. 32, 505-513[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Mossman, T. (1983) J. Immunol. Methods 65, 55-63[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Johansen, F. F., Lambolez, B., Audinat, E., Bochet, P., and Rossier, J. (1995) Neurochem. Int. 26, 239-243[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Hamill, O. P., Marty, A., Neher, E., Sakmann, B., and Sigworth, F. J. (1981) Pfluegers Arch. 391, 85-100[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Koester, J. (1991) in Principles of Neural Science (Kandel, E. R. , Schwartz, J. H. , and Jessel, T. M., eds) , pp. 81-94, Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., New York
46. Condorelli, D. F., Dell'Albani, P., Aronica, E., Genazzani, A. A., Casabona, G., Corsaro, M., Balázs, R., and Nicoletti, F. (1993) J. Neurochem. 61, 2133-2139[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Wood, K. A., Dipasquale, B., and Youle, R. J. (1993) Neuron 11, 621-632[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Mogensen, H. S., Hack, N., Balázs, R., and Jorgensen, O. S. (1994) Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 12, 451-460[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Bhave, S. V., Ghoda, L., and Hoffman, P. L. (1999) J. Neurosci. 19, 3277-3286[Abstract/Free Full Text]
50. Lee, Y.-H., Fang, K. M., Yang, C.-M., Hwang, H.-M., Chiu, C.-T., and Tsai, W. (2000) J. Neurochem. 74, 2401-2411[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Zheng, T. M., Zhu, W. J., Puia, G., Vicini, S., Grayson, D. R., Costa, E., and Caruncho, H. J. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 10952-10956[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52. Gault, L. M., and Siegel, R. E. (1998) J. Neurochem. 70, 1907-1915[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2003 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.



This Article
Abstract
Full Text (PDF)
All Versions of this Article:
278/19/16543    most recent
M300548200v1
Purchase Article
View Shopping Cart
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Citation Map
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Copyright Permissions
Google Scholar
Articles by Engblom, A. C.
Articles by Kristiansen, U.
Articles citing this Article
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Engblom, A. C.
Articles by Kristiansen, U.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.