Vascular Endothelial Cell Growth Factor Activates CRE-binding Protein by Signaling through the KDR Receptor Tyrosine Kinase*

Lindsey D. MayoDagger §, Kelly M. KesslerDagger , Roxana PincheiraDagger , Robert S. Warren, and David B. DonnerDagger ||

From the Dagger  Department of Microbiology and Immunology and the Walther Oncology Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202 and the  Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143

Received for publication, April 3, 2001


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Vascular endothelial cell growth factor (VEGF) plays a crucial role in the development of the cardiovascular system and in promoting angiogenesis associated with physiological and pathological processes. Although a great deal is known of the cytoplasmic signaling pathways activated by VEGF, much less is known of the mechanisms through which VEGF communicates with the nucleus and alters the activity of transcription factors. Binding of VEGF to the KDR/Flk1 receptor tyrosine kinase induces phosphorylation of the CRE-binding protein (CREB) transcription factor on serine 133 and increases CREB DNA binding and transactivation. p38 MAPK/MSK-1 and protein kinase C/p90RSK pathways mediate CREB phosphorylation. Confocal microscopy shows that VEGF-induced phosphorylation of nuclear CREB is blocked by pharmacological inhibition of protein kinase C and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling. Thus, KDR/Flk1 uses multiple pathways to transmit signals into the nucleus where CREB becomes activated. These results suggest that CREB may play a role in alterations of gene expression important to angiogenesis.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Angiogenesis plays an important role in embryonic development, wound healing, and organ regeneration (1, 2). Angiogenesis also contributes to pathologies dependent on neovascularization, among which are tumor growth, diabetes mellitus, ischemic ocular diseases, and rheumatoid arthritis. Vascular endothelial cell growth factor (VEGF)1 is an endothelial cell-specific mitogen that promotes many other events necessary for angiogenesis (1, 3-6). VEGF induces endothelial cell proliferation and movement, remodeling of the extracellular matrix, formation of capillary tubules, and vascular leakage. VEGF plays a role in the development of the cardiovascular system and in the physiology of normal vasculature (3, 7-11). VEGF is produced by many types of tumor cells and, by promoting vascularization, plays a significant role in the progression of cancer (12-14).

VEGF exerts its actions by binding to two cell surface receptors, KDR (the human homolog of Flk1) and Flt1 (15-20), structurally similar to members of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor family (21). Flk1 and Flt1 are essential for fetal angiogenesis, and mouse embryos null for either receptor die in utero between days 8.5 and 9.5 (22, 23). Hematopoietic and endothelial cell development are impaired in Flk1 null mutant mice (23), whereas there is overgrowth of endothelial cells and disorganized blood vessels in Flt1 null mutant mice (22). The phenotypes of Flk1- and Flt1-deficient embryos show that each plays a distinct role in angiogenesis and suggest that KDR/Flk1 and Flt1 utilize distinct signaling cascades to elicit responses.

Flk1 is abundant on the proliferating endothelial cells of vascular sprouts of embryonic and early postnatal brain but is reduced in adult brains in which endothelial cell proliferation has ceased (17). Experiments with mutant forms of VEGF that selectively bind one or the other VEGF receptor show that Flk1/KDR promotes endothelial cell proliferation and survival (24). The induction of chemotaxis and procoagulant activity by VEGF and placental growth factor (PlGF), a VEGF homolog that binds Flt1, suggests that these responses are mediated, at least in part, by Flt1 (25-27). Thus, the functions of VEGF are segregated between its two receptors.

In previous studies we demonstrated that VEGF promotes the tyrosine phosphorylation of signaling molecules that contain SH2 domains, and this process is associated with endothelial cell proliferation (28). By comparing signaling events induced by VEGF or PlGF, in the absence or presence of SU5416, a KDR/Flk1 antagonist (29), we identified signaling molecules that interact with and promote or inhibit KDR/Flk1 action (30). The present study finally identifies pathways through which cytoplasmic signaling pathways downstream of KDR/Flk1 transmit signals into the nucleus. VEGF promotes phosphorylation and activation of the cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein by activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase/MSK-1 and protein kinase C/p90RSK signaling pathways downstream of KDR. As CREB is a transcription factor that plays an important role in promoting proliferation and cellular adaptive responses (31), a mechanism has been defined through which VEGF/KDR may allow endothelial cells to respond to changes in their environment through alterations of gene expression.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- Human recombinant VEGF was a gift from Genentech (South San Francisco, CA). SU5416 was a gift from SUGEN, Inc. (South San Francisco, CA). Placenta growth factor and VEGF-D were from R & D Laboratories (Minneapolis, MN). Antibodies to phosphorylated CREB/ATF-1, phosphorylated MSK-1, phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated p38 MAPK, and MAPK were from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA). Anti-MAPKAP kinase 2 and recombinant ATF-1 were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Anti-MAPKAP kinase 3 was from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. (Lake Placid, NY). PGAL4-CREB was from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA), and the GAL4 luciferase reporter construct was a kind gift of Dr. Lawrence Quilliam (Indiana University School of Medicine). GF109203X was from LC Laboratories (Boston). All other inhibitors were from Calbiochem or Sigma.

Cell Culture and Western Blotting-- HUVEC were grown on 0.2% gelatin-coated tissue culture plates in endothelial cell growth medium (Clonetics, San Diego) under 5% CO2 at 37 °C. For VEGF stimulation, the cells were cultured in endothelial cell basal medium (Clonetics) that was supplemented with 1% bovine serum albumin. After 16 h, the cells were treated with various inhibitors as described in the figure legends and then stimulated with 1 nM VEGF for 10 min. Cells were harvested into lysis buffer (50 mM Hepes, pH 7.0, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1.2% Triton X-100, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 100 mM NaF, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate) that was supplemented with 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.15 units/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml pepstatin A and incubated on ice for 30 min, being vortexed every 10 min. Fifty micrograms from each sample was fractionated by SDS-PAGE and then transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. The membranes were blocked in 5% nonfat dried milk in PBST. Antibodies used to probe the Western blots were p-ERK, ERK, p38 MAPK, MAPK, pCREB, and CREB (Cell Signaling Technologies, Beverly, MA). Proteins on the Western blots were detected using the enhanced chemiluminescent detection system.

In Vitro Kinase Assays-- Whole cell lysates were prepared from HUVEC treated with medium or VEGF for 10 min as described above. In independent experiments, MAPKAP kinase-2, MAPKAP kinase-2, or MSK-1 were immunoprecipitated from 500 µg of whole cell lysate (2-h incubations at 4 °C using 2 µg of an antibody specific to each kinase). Protein A/G-agarose was added and incubation continued for 1 h. After centrifugation, the pellets were washed with kinase assay buffer (20 mM MOPS, pH 7.2, 25 mM, beta -glycerol phosphate, 5 mM EGTA, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 75 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol), and this procedure was repeated twice. The washed pellet was incubated for 10 min at 37 °C in 25 µl of kinase assay buffer modified to contain 50 µM ATP and 1 µg of recombinant ATF-1. Immunoprecipitated proteins were fractionated on 8% polyacrylamide gels, and Western blots were probed with antibodies to phosphorylated CREB/ATF-1 or p-MSK-1.

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift and Gene Reporter Assays-- Nuclear protein extracts were prepared using the NE-PER kit by cell lysis and centrifugation according to the directions of the manufacturer (Pierce). The CRE and mutant CRE double-stranded DNA oligonucleotides were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. The CRE oligonucleotide was end-labeled with gamma -32P using the T4 polynucleotide kinase and purified by passage through G-25 spin column. To initiate formation of DNA-protein complexes 6 µg of each nuclear extract, binding buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM KCl, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM dithiothreitol, and 5% glycerol), and 1 µg of poly(dI-dC) in a final volume of 20 µl were incubated on ice for 10 min, and then 5 ng of end-labeled oligonucleotide was added to the reaction which was continued for an additional 20 min. The reaction mixture was fractionated on a 5% native polyacrylamide gel (1.5 h, 180 V). The gel was dried and exposed to film. For gene reporter assays, cells were transiently cotransfected with beta -galactosidase and CMV-Gal4-CREB (a plasmid consisting of the DNA binding domain of Gal4 and the transactivation domain of CREB) and pGal4-Tk-Luc (an expression vector for the luciferase reporter gene driven by the enhancerless thymidine kinase promoter linked to four copies of the Gal4 regulatory sequence). After 24 h, luciferase activity was assayed in cell lysates and normalized to beta -galactosidase expression.

Confocal Microscopy-- HUVEC incubated with vehicle, SB202190, or GF109203X for 1 h and then with VEGF for 10 min were fixed, permeated with 0.1% Triton X-100, and blocked with 2% bovine serum albumin. Anti-phospho-CREB was added followed by a Texas Red-conjugated sheep anti-rabbit secondary antibody. The nucleus was detected by staining with nuclear dye Syto 16. Excitation of the stains was performed on a Bio-Rad MRC 1024 Krypton/Argon laser confocal imaging system.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Experiments were conducted to determine whether VEGF induces CREB phosphorylation and transactivation and, if so, to identify the receptor through which this effect is mediated. HUVEC were stimulated with VEGF, and a Western blot prepared from cell lysates was probed with an antibody directed toward CREB phosphorylated on serine 133. VEGF induced CREB phosphorylation in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 1A). Due to the structural similarities between CREB and ATF-1 (31), the phospho-CREB antibody also recognizes phosphorylated serine 63 of ATF-1. The phosphorylation kinetics CREB and ATF-1 increased in parallel. To evaluate which VEGF receptor was responsible for inducing CREB and ATF-1 phosphorylation, HUVEC were stimulated with VEGF or PlGF, which only binds Flt1 (26, 27). VEGF, but not PlGF, induced CREB phosphorylation, showing that KDR induced this event (Fig. 1B). Additionally, SU5416, a low molecular weight KDR antagonist (29), abrogated VEGF-induced CREB and ATF-1 phosphorylation. To exclude further the possibility that Flt1 contributes to activation of CREB, VEGF-D, another member of the VEGF family does not bind Flt1 (32), was tested and found to induce phosphorylation of CREB and ATF-1 (Fig. 1C).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   CREB phosphorylation and activation induced by VEGF is mediated by signaling through KDR. A, HUVEC were incubated with 1 nM VEGF for various times and then a Western blot prepared from cell lysates was probed with anti-pCREB (top) or anti-CREB (bottom). B, HUVEC were incubated with medium or 1 µM SU5416 for 1 h and then with 1 nM VEGF or PlGF for 10 min. A Western blot was probed with anti-pCREB (top) or anti-CREB (bottom). C, HUVEC were incubated with medium or 1 nM VEGF-D for 10 min. A Western blot was probed with anti-pCREB (top) or anti-CREB (bottom). D, CREB reporter activity in cells treated with vehicle or VEGF was assayed.

Phosphorylation of serine 133 in CREB does not alter the DNA binding of CREB to CRE, but increases its association with adapter proteins such as the CREB-binding protein, leading to activation of transcription. Therefore, the demonstration that treatment of HUVEC with VEGF leads to phosphorylation of CREB downstream of KDR next led us to evaluate whether CREB transcriptional activity was increased by VEGF. A gene reporter assay in which HUVEC were transfected with pGal4-CREB and a Gal4 luciferase reporter construct demonstrated that VEGF induces a 2.5-fold stimulation of CREB transcriptional activation (Fig. 1D).

Experiments were next conducted to identify the signaling pathways that mediated CREB phosphorylation. By probing Western blots of HUVEC with antibodies to activated MAPK (ERK1 and -2) and p38 MAPK, we found that VEGF activates these each of these kinases, with maximal activation occurring after 10 min (Fig. 2, A and B). To test whether activation of MAPK family members was mediated by signaling through KDR, HUVEC were incubated in the absence or presence of SU5416 and then stimulated with VEGF or PlGF. The KDR antagonist abrogated VEGF activation of p38 MAPK (Fig. 3A) and ERK1 and ERK2 (Fig. 3B), indicating that the MAPKs are activated through KDR signaling. This result is consistent with the inability of PlGF to activate p38 MAPK or MAPK (Fig. 3, A and B).


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   p38 MAPK and MAPK activation by VEGF. HUVEC were treated with VEGF for various times, and Western blots were prepared from cell lysates. A, a Western blot was probed with an anti-phospho-p38 MAPK (top) and then with anti-p38 MAPK (bottom). B, a Western blot was probed with anti-pMAPK (top) and then with anti-MAPK (bottom).


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   p38 MAPK and MAPK are activated by signaling through KDR. HUVEC incubated in the absence or presence of 1 µM SU5416 were treated with VEGF. A, a Western blot was probed with anti-phospho-p38 MAPK (top) and then with anti-p38 MAPK (bottom). B, a Western blot was probed with anti-pMAPK (top) and then with anti-MAPK (bottom).

To determine whether MAPK, or p38 MAPK, plays a role in CREB phosphorylation, HUVEC were treated with PD98059, a MAPK kinase inhibitor that blocks MAPK activation (33), or SB202190, an inhibitor of p38 MAPK (34), and then with VEGF. CREB phosphorylation induced by VEGF was unaffected by inhibition of MAPK by PD98059. However, p38 MAPK inhibition partly suppressed CREB phosphorylation (Fig. 4A), showing that this member of the MAPK family plays a role in VEGF activation of CREB.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Signaling pathways used by VEGF to promote CREB phosphorylation. A, HUVEC were treated with PD98059 or SB202190 for 1 h and then incubated in the absence or presence of 1 nM VEGF for 10 min. CREB phosphorylation was assayed by Western blot analysis. B, HUVEC were treated with medium, 25 µM PD98059, 20 µM LY294002, 25 µM SB202190, 20 µM H89, 100 nM K252A, 1 µM GF109203X, or GF109203X and SB202190 and then with VEGF for 10 min. CREB phosphorylation was assayed by Western blot analysis. C, HUVEC were incubated with medium, SB202190, or GF109203X and then treated with medium or VEGF. CREB phosphorylation was assayed Western blotting. D, HUVEC were incubated with medium, SB202190, or GF109203X and then with medium or VEGF. p90RSK phosphorylation was assayed by probing a Western blot with anti-phospho-RSK. E, an in vitro kinase assay using ATF-1 as substrate was used to test for activation of MAPKAP kinase 2, MAPKAP kinase 3, and MSK-1. These kinases were immunoprecipitated from lysates of control or VEGF-treated HUVEC, and a Western blot was probed with anti-phosphorylated CREB/ATF1. F, HUVEC were incubated with GF109203X or SB202190 and then with vehicle or VEGF. MSK1 was immunoprecipitated from cell lysates, and a Western blot was probed with antibodies to phosphorylated CREB/ATF1 and phosphorylated MSK-1.

We next examined whether other kinases contribute to CREB activation by VEGF. HUVEC were treated with wortmannin, an inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, H89, an inhibitor of protein kinase A, K252A, an inhibitor of calmodulin kinase II, or GF109203X, an inhibitor of protein kinase C (PKC) (35). PD98059 and SB202190 were included in the experiment as positive and negative controls. LY294002, H89, and K252A did not impair CREB phosphorylation induced by VEGF, whereas GF109203X partly inhibited phosphorylation (Fig. 4B). Treatment of cells with GF109203X and SB202190 showed that inhibition of PKC and p38 MAPK had no effect on basal CREB phosphorylation but blocked VEGF-induced phosphorylation (Fig. 4C).

To identify the downstream kinase that mediated CREB phosphorylation induced by PKC, HUVEC were incubated with GF102203X or SB202190 and then with VEGF (Fig. 4D). A Western blot prepared from cell lysates was probed with an antibody to phosphorylated (active) p90RSK, a CREB kinase downstream of PKC. VEGF promoted p90RSK phosphorylation and this was inhibited by GF102203X, but not SB202190, suggesting that a PKC/p90RSK pathway is a component of the mechanism through which VEGF induces CREB phosphorylation.

MAPKAP kinase 2, MAPKAP kinase 3, and MSK-1 are CREB and ATF-1 kinases activated by p38 MAPK (36-39). As antibodies to phosphorylated forms of each of these CREB kinases are not available, their activation was determined by an in vitro kinase assay in which ATF-1 was the substrate. HUVEC were stimulated with vehicle or VEGF, and then MAPKAP kinase 2, MAPKAP kinase 3, or MSK-1 were immunoprecipitated from cell lysates and incubated with ATF-1. A Western blot was probed with an antibody to phosphorylated CREB/ATF-1 and, of the three kinases, VEGF activated only MSK1 (Fig. 4E). HUVEC were next incubated with GF102203X or SB202190, to inhibit PKC and p38 MAPK activation, respectively, and then stimulated with VEGF. MSK1 immunoprecipitated from cell lysates was incubated with ATF-1 and a Western blot probed with anti-phospho-CREB/ATF-1 and then with anti-phospho-MSK-1. VEGF induced phosphorylation of ATF-1 and MSK-1, and this was blocked by inhibition of p38 MAPK but not PKC (Fig. 4F). This result suggests that activation of p38 MAPK/MSK1 is a component of a signaling cascade through which VEGF induces CREB phosphorylation.

Confocal microscopy was conducted to establish a bridge between phosphorylation of CREB on serine 133 and subsequent DNA binding of the transcription factor. HUVEC were stimulated with VEGF or treated with inhibitors of PKC and p38 MAPK and then with VEGF. Confocal microscopy established that nuclear phosphorylation of CREB was induced by VEGF, and this was inhibited by pharmacological blockade of the p38 MAPK and PKC signaling cascades (Fig. 5).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Confocal microscopy. HUVEC were treated with vehicle or SB202190 together with GF109203X for 1 h and then stimulated with VEGF. Confocal microscopy was used to detect and localize phosphorylated CREB/ATF-1.

CREB binds to the specific sequence, 5'-TGFCGTCA-3', known as CRE. An electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) showed that stimulation of HUVEC with VEGF induced the formation of a protein-DNA complex. The protein-DNA complex was lost upon addition of control but not mutant CRE. Furthermore, supershifting with antibodies directed against CREB, c-Fos, and ATF2 showed that only CREB was a component of the retarded DNA-protein complex induced by VEGF (Fig. 6A). To establish that KDR was the receptor required for induction of CREB/DNA binding, HUVEC were treated with SU5416 before incubation with VEGF. CREB DNA binding was absent after exposure of HUVEC to SU5416, demonstrating that KDR is required for activation of CREB (Fig. 6B).


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Binding of CREB to DNA. A, nuclear extracts of HUVEC treated with vehicle or VEGF were incubated with a 100-fold excess of control or mutant CRE before CREB DNA binding was assayed by EMSA. Supershifting with anti-CREB (alpha -CREB), anti-Fos (alpha -fos), or anti-ATF2 (alpha -ATF2) established the component(s) of the retarded complex. B, HUVEC were treated with medium or SU5416 for 1 h and then with VEGF. Nuclear extracts were used for EMSA.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Angiogenesis requires the coordinated expression of gene products that allow endothelial cells to alter their environment, proliferate, migrate, and intubate (2). Physiological processes, such as wound healing, or pathological processes, such as tumor growth, require that the cells involved switch from a quiescent to an angiogenic phenotype (2). This process, called the angiogenic switch, is characterized by increased production of angiogenic mediators, such as VEGF and its receptors, decreased production of inhibitors of angiogenesis, such as thrombospondin, or both types of events (8, 9, 11, 17, 40-42). VEGF-induced angiogenesis can be exploited to perfuse tissues isolated by blocked blood vessels, and inhibition of VEGF and its receptors blocks the progression of cancer (1, 12, 19, 43, 44).

Results from this and previous studies (30, 45, 46) are summarized in the model in Fig. 7, which shows that by signaling through KDR/Flk1, VEGF induces activation of MAPK, p38 MAPK, Akt, and tyrosine phosphorylation of phospholipase Cgamma and focal adhesion kinase. Focal adhesion kinase is associated with cell migration, whereas phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT and MAPK signaling promote cell survival (47). MAPK also promotes the proliferative response of endothelial cells to VEGF (30). KDR/Flk1 binds a novel adaptor protein, VRAP, which may shuttle proteins that contain SH2 domains to the receptor (48) and the SHP-1 protein tyrosine phosphatase (49). The level of SHP-1 associated with KDR/Flk1 is augmented by tumor necrosis factor, indicating that the activity of this receptor and its association with signaling proteins is regulated by cytokines (49).


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   A model of KDR/Flk1 signaling.

Stimulation of porcine aortic endothelial cells overexpressing KDR/Flk1 or Flt1 with VEGF induces association of the former, but not the latter, receptor with Shc, Grb2, Nck, SHP-1, and SHP-2 (50, 51). MAPK activation, changes of cell morphology, actin reorganization, membrane ruffling, chemotaxis, and cell proliferation are also induced by signaling through KDR/Flk1. These distinctions between KDR/Flk1 and Flt1 were not observed in studies with NIH 3T3 cells transfected with these receptors (52, 53, 57) or in experiments in which affigel-immobilized Flt1 was used to precipitate proteins from cell lysates (54). However, the weight of evidence from experiments indicates that KDR/Flk1 is a pleiotropic inducer of VEGF action in the endothelium, whereas the role of Flt1 needs to be resolved more clearly. Thus, considerable insight has been gained into cytoplasmic events initiated by VEGF in support of its activities. Far less is known of how VEGF induces changes of gene expression that underlie angiogenesis.

CREB is a 43-kDa member of the CREB/CREM/ATF family of nuclear transcription factors that was first identified as a mediator of cyclic AMP-induced gene expression (55). Activation of CREB is mediated by phosphorylation of serine 133 (56), which augments CREB-induced gene transcription (57). Peptide hormones, growth factors, neuronal activity, UV irradiation, and cross-linking of surface IgG activate CREB (38, 57-61). This diversity of signal initiation, and the different signaling systems through which these cellular stressors act, indicates that serine 133 in CREB may be a substrate for a multiplicity of protein kinases. Mitogen-induced phosphorylation commences with stimulation of guanine nucleotide exchange factors, such as SOS, which activates Ras. Ras induces activation of the Raf serine-threonine kinase, an upstream activator of MAPK kinase. Downstream targets of the MAPK kinases are the MAPK ERK1 and ERK2, which in turn can play a role in activation of ribosomal S6 kinase pp90RSK, a CREB kinase (62). p38 MAPK and its downstream effectors MAPKAP-K2 and -3 are components of an alternative pathway leading to CREB activation (36-39). Other kinases that activate CREB are MSK1, a relative of p90RSK, which is activated by ERKs, calcium calmodulin-dependent kinases, and protein kinase C (61, 63-65).

The present study has shown that VEGF increases phosphorylation of nuclear CREB on serine 133 and increases CREB DNA binding and transactivation. Thus, three independent lines of experimentation support the conclusion that VEGF activates CREB. The ability of VEGF and VEGF-D, but not PlGF, to induce CREB phosphorylation shows that it is by signaling through KDR that CREB activation is mediated. This conclusion is supported by the ability of SU5416 to block CREB activation by VEGF. Thus, only one of the two VEGF receptors plays a role in the induction of CREB activity.

ERK1 and ERK2, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, protein kinase A, and calmodulin kinase II were excluded as mediators of VEGF-induced CREB phosphorylation based on the inability of PD98059, LY294002, H89, and K252A, respectively, to inhibit VEGF-induced CREB phosphorylation. Inhibition of p38 MAPK by SB202190 partly inhibited VEGF-induced activation of CREB, as did GF109203X, an inhibitor of PKC. Complete blockade of CREB activation was observed when p38 MAPK and PKC were inhibited. These results show that p38 MAPK and PKC mediate CREB phosphorylation downstream of KDR.

CREB plays an important role in cell proliferation, differentiation, adaptive responses, and metabolism (31, 66). In mice, CREB is required for the generation of a normal repertoire of T cell lineages during development, and the absence of CREB leads to dwarfism and cardiac myopathy in the adult (67-69). CREB family members are important for learning and memory and contribute to the neuronal adaptation to drugs of abuse (70, 71). Our observations now suggest that by mediating cellular responses to VEGF, CREB is likely to play an important role in endothelial cell function and blood vessel development.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants CA73023 (to D. B. D.) and CA84018 (to R. S. W.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Supported by Hematology-Oncology Training Grant T32 DK07519 from the National Institutes of Health.

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed: the Walther Oncology Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, 1044 West Walnut St., Indianapolis, IN 46202. Tel.: 317-278-2155; Fax: 317-274-7592; E-mail: ddonner@IUPUI.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 2, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M102932200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: VEGF, vascular endothelial cell growth factor; PlGF, placental growth factor; HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cells; CREB, CRE-binding protein; ATF-1, activating transcription factor-1; MAPK, mitogen activated protein kinase; PKC, protein kinase C; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; MOPS, 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Ferrara, N. (1999) J. Mol. Med. 77, 527-543[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Risau, W. (1997) Nature 386, 671-674[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Connolly, D. T., Heuvelman, D. M., Nelson, R., Olander, J. V., Eppley, B. L., Delfino, J. J., Siegel, N. R., Leimgruber, R. M., and Feder, J. (1989) J. Clin. Invest. 84, 1470-14784[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Gospodarowicz, D., Abraham, J. A., and Schilling, J. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 7311-7315[Abstract]
5. Keck, P. J., Hauser, S. D., Krivi, G., Sanzo, K., Warren, T., Feder, J., and Connolly, D. T. (1989) Science 246, 1309-1312[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Leung, D. W., Cachianes, G., Kuang, W. J., Goeddel, D. V., and Ferrara, N. (1989) Science 246, 1306-1309[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Berse, B., Brown, L. F., Van de Water, L., Dvorak, H. F., and Senger, D. R. (1992) Mol. Biol. Cell 3, 211-220[Abstract]
8. Breier, G., Albrecht, U., Sterrer, S., and Risau, W. (1992) Development 114, 521-532[Abstract]
9. Jakeman, L. B., Armanini, M., Phillips, H. S., and Ferrara, N. (1993) Endocrinology 133, 848-859[Abstract]
10. Monacci, W. T., Merrill, M. J., and Oldfield, E. H. (1993) Am. J. Physiol. 264, C995-C1002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Schweiki, D., Itin, A., Neufeld, G., Gitay-Goren, H., and Keshet, E. (1993) J. Clin. Invest. 91, 2235-2243[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Jin Kim, K., Li, B., Winer, J., Armanini, M., Gillett, N., Phillips, H. S., and Ferrara, N. (1993) Nature 262, 841-844
13. Plate, K. H., Breier, B., Weich, H. A., and Risau, W. (1992) Nature 359, 845-848[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Senger, D. R., Perruzzzi, D. A., Feder, J., and Dvorak, H. F. (1986) Cancer Res. 46, 5629-5632[Abstract]
15. De Vries, C., Escobedo, J. A., Ueno, H., Houck, K., Ferrara, N., and Williams, L. T. (1992) Science 255, 989-991[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Mathews, W., Jordan, C. T., Gavin, M., Jenkins, N. A., Copeland, N. G., and Lemischka, I. R. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 9026-9030[Abstract]
17. Millauer, B., Wizigmann-Voos, S., Schnurch, H., Martinez, R., Moller, N. P. H., Risau, W., and Ullrich, A. (1993) Cell 72, 835-846[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Petrova, T. V., Makinen, T., and Alitalo, K. (1999) Exp. Cell Res. 253, 117-130[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Quinn, T. P., Peters, K. G., De Vries, C., Ferrara, N., and Williams, L. T. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 7533-7537[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Terman, B. C., Dougher-Vermazen, M., Carrion, M. E., Dimitrov, D., Armellino, D. C., Gospodarowicz, D., and Bohlen, P. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 187, 1579-1586[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Shibuya, M., Yamane, A., Ikeda, T., Tojo, A., Matushime, H., and Sato, M. (1990) Oncogene 5, 519-524[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Fong, G.-H., Rossant, J., Gertsenstein, M., and Breitman, M. L. (1995) Nature 376, 66-70[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Shalaby, F., Rossant, J., Yamaguchi, T. P., Gertsenstein, M., Wu, X.-F., Breitman, M. L., and Schuh, A. C. (1995) Nature 376, 62-66[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Keyt, B. A., Nguyen, H. V., Berleau, L. T., Duarte, C. M., Park, J., Chen, H., and Ferrara, N. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5638-5646[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Clauss, M., Weich, H., Breier, G., Kniest, U., Rockl, W., Waltenberger, J., and Risau, W. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 17629-17634[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Park, J. E., Chen, H. H., Winer, J., Houck, K. A., and Ferrara, N. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 5646-25654
27. Sawano, A., Takahashi, T., Yamaguchi, S., Aonuma, M., and Shibuya, M. (1996) Cell Growth Differ. 7, 213-221[Abstract]
28. Guo, D., Jia, Q., Song, H.-Y., Warren, R. S., and Donner, D. B. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 6729-6733[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Strawn, L. M., McMahon, G., App, H., Schreck, R., Kuchler, W. R., Longhi, M. P., Hui, T. H., Tang, C., Levitski, A., Gaxrit, A., Chen, I., Keri, G., Orfi, L., Risau, W., Flamme, I., Ullrich, A., Hirth, K. P., and Shawver, L. K. (1996) Cancer Res. 56, 3540-3545[Abstract]
30. Wu, L. W., Mayo, L. D., Dunbar, J. D., Kessler, K. M., Baerwald, M. R., Jaffe, E. A., Wang, D., Warren, R. S., and Donner, D. B. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 5096-5103[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Shaywitz, A. J., and Greenberg, M. E. (1999) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68, 821-861[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Achen, M. G., Jeltsch, M., Kukk, E., Makinen, T., Vitali, A., Wilks, A. F., Alitalo, K., and Stacker, S. A. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 548-553[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Dudley, D. T., Pang, L., Decker, S. J., Bridges, A. J., and Saltiel, A. R. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 7686-7689[Abstract]
34. Cuenda, A., Rouse, J., Doza, Y. N., Meier, R., Cohen, P., Gallagher, T. F., Young, P. R., and Lee, J. C. (1995) FEBS Lett. 364, 229-233[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Toullec, D., Pianetti, P., Coste, H., Bellevergue, P., Grand-Perret, T., Ajakane, M., Baudet, V., Boissin, P., Boursier, E., and Loriollle, F. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 5771-15781
36. Deak, M., Clifton, A. D., Lucocq, L. M., and Alessi, D. R. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 4226-4241[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Price, M. A., Cruzalegui, F. H., and Treisman, R. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 6552-6563[Abstract]
38. Tan, Y., Rouse, J., Zhang, A., Cariati, C., Cohen, P., and Comb, M. J. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 4629-4642[Abstract]
39. Xing, J., Kornhauser, J. M., Xia, Z., Thiele, E. A., and Greenberg, M. E. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 1946-1955[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Ankoma-Sey, V., Matli, M., Chang, K. B., Lalazar, A., Donner, D. B., Wong, L., Warren, R. S., and Friedman, S. L. (1998) Oncogene 17, 115-122[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Wang, D., Donner, D. B., and Warren, R. S. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 15905-15911[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Warren, R. S., Yuan, H., Matli, M. R., Ferrara, N., and Donner, D. B. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 29483-29488[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Millauer, B., Shawver, L. K., Plate, K. H., Risau, W., and Ullrich, A. (1994) Nature 367, 576-579[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Warren, R. S., Yuan, H., Matli, M. R., Gillett, N. A., and Ferrara, N. (1995) J. Clin. Invest. 95, 1789-1797[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Abedi, H., and Zachary, I. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 15442-15451[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Gerber, H.-P., McMurtrey, A., Kowalski, J., Yan, M., Keyt, B. A., Dixit, V., and Ferrara, N. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 30336-30343[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Parrizas, M., Saltiel, A. R., and LeRoith, D. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 154-161[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Wu, L. W., Mayo, L. D., Dunbar, J. D., Kessler, K. M., Ozes, O. N., Warren, R. S., and Donner, D. B. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 6059-6062[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Guo, D.-Q., Wu, L.-W., Dunbar, J. D., Ozes, O. N., Mayo, L. D., Kessler, K. M., Gustin, J. A., Baerwald, M. R., Jaffe, E. A., Warren, R. S., and Donner, D. B. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 11216-11221[Abstract/Free Full Text]
50. Kroll, J., and Waltenberger, J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 32521-32527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51. Waltenberger, J., Claesson-Welsh, L., Siegbahn, A., Shibuya, M., and Heldin, C.-H. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 6988-26995
52. Seetharam, L., Gotoh, N., Maru, Y., Neufeld, G., Yamaguchi, S., and Shibuya, M. (1995) Oncogene 10, 135-147[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Takahashi, T., and Shibuya, M. (1997) Oncogene 14, 2079-2089[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Ito, N., Wernstedt, C., Engstrom, U., and Claesson-Welsh, L. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 23410-23418[Abstract/Free Full Text]
55. Montminy, M. R., and Bilezikjian, L. M. (1987) Nature 328, 175-178[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
56. Gonzalez, G. A., and Montminy, M. R. (1989) Cell 59, 675-680[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
57. Ginty, D. D., Bonni, A., and Greenberg, M. E. (1994) Cell 77, 713-725[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
58. Bito, H., Deisseroth, K., and Tsien, R. W. (1995) Cell 87, 1203-1214
59. Bohm, M., Moellmann, G., Cheng, E., Alvarex-Fraanco, M., Wagner, S., Sassone-Corsi, P., and Halaban, R. (1995) Cell Growth Differ. 6, 291-302[Abstract]
60. Iordanov, M., Bender, K., Ade, T., Schmid, W., Sachsenmaier, C., Engel, K., Gaestel, M., Rahmsdorf, H. J., and Herrlich, P. (1996) EMBO J. 16, 1009-1022[Abstract/Free Full Text]
61. Xie, H., and Rothstein, T. L. (1995) J. Immunol. 154, 1717-1723[Abstract/Free Full Text]
62. De Cesare, D., Jacquot, S., Hanauer, A., and Sassone-Corsi, P. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 12202-12207[Abstract/Free Full Text]
63. Sun, P., Enslen, H., Myung, P. S., and Maurer, R. A. (1994) Genes Dev. 8, 2527-2539[Abstract]
64. Sheng, M., Thompson, M. A., and Greenberg, M. E. (1991) Science 252, 1427-1430[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
65. Xing, J., Ginty, D. D., and Greenberg, M. E. (1996) Science 273, 959-963[Abstract]
66. Hanson, R. W., and Reshef, L. (1997) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 66, 581-611[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
67. Barton, K., Muthusamy, N., Chanyangam, M., Fischer, C., Clendenin, C., and Leiden, J. M. (1996) Nature 379, 81-85[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
68. Fentzke, R. C., Korcarz, C. E., Lang, R. M., Lin, H., and Leiden, J. M. (1998) J. Clin. Invest. 101, 2415-2426[Abstract/Free Full Text]
69. Struthers, R. S., Vale, W. W., Arias, C., Sawchenko, P. E., and Montminy, M. R. (1991) Nature 350, 622-624[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
70. Silva, A. J., Kogan, J. H., Frankland, P. W., and Kida, S. (1998) Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 21, 127-148[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
71. Blendy, J. A., and Maldonado, R. (1998) J. Mol. Med. 76, 104-110[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.