Functional Conservation of Phosphorylation-specific Prolyl Isomerases in Plants*

Jia-Long YaoDagger , Oliver Kops§, Pei-Jung Lu§||, and Kun Ping Lu§**

From the Dagger  Horticulture and Food Research Institute of New Zealand, Private Bag, 92169 Auckland, New Zealand and the § Cancer Biology Program, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215

Received for publication, August 3, 2000, and in revised form, September 21, 2000




    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The phosphorylation-specific peptidyl prolyl cis/trans isomerase (PPIase) Pin1 in humans and its homologues in yeast and animal species play an important role in cell cycle regulation. These PPIases consist of an NH2-terminal WW domain that binds to specific phosphoserine- or phosphothreonine-proline motifs present in a subset of phosphoproteins and a COOH-terminal PPIase domain that specifically isomerizes the phosphorylated serine/threonine-proline peptide bonds. Here, we describe the isolation of MdPin1, a Pin1 homologue from the plant species apple (Malus domestica) and show that it has the same phosphorylation-specific substrate specificity and can be inhibited by juglone in vitro, as is the case for Pin1. A search in the plant expressed sequence tag data bases reveals that the Pin1-type PPIases are present in various plants, and there are multiple genes in one organism, such as soybean (Glycine max) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Furthermore, all these plant Pin1-type PPIases, including AtPin1 in Arabidopsis thaliana, do not have a WW domain, but all contain a four-amino acid insertion next to the phospho-specific recognition site of the active site. Interestingly, like Pin1, both MdPin1 and AtPin1 are able to rescue the lethal mitotic phenotype of a temperature-sensitive mutation in the Pin1 homologue ESS1/PTF1 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. However, deleting the extra four amino acid residues abolished the ability of AtPin1 to rescue the yeast mutation under non-overexpression conditions, indicating that these extra amino acids may be important for mediating the substrate interaction of plant enzymes. Finally, expression of MdPin1 is tightly associated with cell division both during apple fruit development in vivo and during cell cultures in vitro. These results have demonstrated that phosphorylation-specific PPIases are highly conserved functionally in yeast, animal, and plant species. Furthermore, the experiments suggest that although plant Pin1-type enzymes do not have a WW domain, they may fulfill the same functions as Pin1 and its homologues do in other organisms.




    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Peptidyl prolyl cis/trans isomerases (PPIases)1 catalyze the energetically unfavorable and intrinsically slow process of cis/trans isomerization of peptide bonds amino-terminal to a proline (1-3). The PPIases are ubiquitous enzymes and have been shown to be involved in protein folding, protein translocation through biological membranes, and signal transduction (1, 4, 5). Three structurally distinct families of PPIases have been identified so far. Cyclophilins and FK506-binding proteins are two well characterized families of PPIases, which are targets for the immunosuppressive drugs cyclosporin A and FK506, respectively (2, 6, 7). However, inhibition of the PPIase activity of cyclophilins and FK506-binding proteins is not required for the immunosuppressive property of cyclosporin A and FK506 (8). Furthermore, despite their high conservation in various organisms, no member of the cyclophilin or FK506-binding protein families seems to be essential, because a yeast strain with deletions in all these PPIases is still viable (9). Thus, evidence for the biological importance of the isomerase activity in these two PPIase families has been limited.

Recently, a third family of PPIases, with the Escherichia coli parvulin being the prototype, has been described. Among this family are the highly conserved Pin1-type PPIases (10, 11), which are the only PPIases that seem to be essential for cell survival, at least in budding yeast and HeLa cells. The Pin1-type PPIases, such as the human Pin1 (11), Saccharomyces cerevisiae ESS1/Ptf1 (10, 12, 13), Drosophila Dodo (14), Neurospora crassa Ssp1 (15), Xenopus Pin1 (16), Aspergillus nidulans Pin1 (17), and others, consist of an amino-terminal WW domain and a carboxyl-terminal PPIase domain. WW domains, which are characterized by two invariant tryptophans, are present in a variety of signaling and regulatory proteins and were originally identified as protein interaction modules that bind to proline-rich regions in protein targets (18, 19). The WW domain of Pin1 has recently been shown to function as a phosphoprotein-binding module that binds to specific phosphoserine- and phosphothreonine-proline (pSer/pThr-Pro) motifs (20). Because these motifs are targets for some proline-directed kinases in the cell cycle, activation of these kinases is thought to create the binding sites for the WW domain of Pin1 (21). The PPIase domain of the Pin1-type proteins shows some homology to the E. coli parvulin (22) and the human parvulin homologue, hPar14 (23). However, in contrast to other parvulin-type PPIases, all members of the Pin1-type PPIases exhibit a very distinct substrate specificity. They specifically isomerize only phosphorylated Ser/Thr-Pro bonds, but not their nonphosphorylated counterparts (24, 25). As proposed earlier (26), the phosphorylation-specific eukaryotic PPIases have been designated Pin1-type PPIases for clarity throughout this article. Significantly, phosphorylation on Ser/Thr-Pro motifs further restrains the already slow cis/trans prolyl isomerization of peptide bonds (25, 27). Moreover, phosphorylation also renders pSer/pThr-Pro peptide bonds resistant to the catalytic action of other PPIases characterized so far (25). Therefore, phosphorylation on Ser/Thr-Pro leads to a distinct structural feature that cannot be achieved by phosphorylation on other Ser/Thr sites that are not followed by a proline, and Pin1-type PPIases are unique isomerases that specifically isomerize phosphorylated Ser/Thr-Pro bonds (21).

As an essential mitotic regulator in budding yeast and HeLa cells, Pin1 binds to a defined subset of phosphoproteins, many of which are also recognized by the mitosis- and phospho-specific monoclonal antibody MPM-2, like Cdc25, tau, and the COOH-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II (25, 28-30). Furthermore, Pin1 regulates the functions of its binding proteins, including inhibiting the mitosis-promoting activity of Cdc25C (28) and restoring the biological activity of Alzheimer-associated tau protein (29). Depletion or mutations of Pin1 induce premature mitotic entry and mitotic arrest in yeast, HeLa cells, and Xenopus egg extracts (11, 13, 16, 17, 28). Pin1 is also required for the replication checkpoint in Xenopus extracts (16). Furthermore, in neurons of Alzheimer's disease patients, depletion of Pin1 is associated with hyperphosphorylated tau and neuronal loss (29). In addition, ESS1/PTF1 seems to play an important role in mRNA maturation, because its mutation leads to a defect in 3'-end formation of pre-mRNAs (13). Recently, a link between ESS1/PTF1 and the general transcription machinery via its interaction with the phosphorylated COOH-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II has been described (30). Recent results from our laboratory indicate that the phosphatase PP2A is conformation-specific, dephosphorylating only the trans isomer of its specific pSer/pThr-Pro targets. Interestingly, the dephosphorylation of a protein or peptide by PP2A can be dramatically influenced by the PPIase activity of Pin1, which apparently converts cis pSer/pThr-Pro bonds in the substrate into PP2A-accessible trans peptide bonds (31). Furthermore, a function in protein folding has been suggested for the N. crassa protein Ssp1, because it is able to accelerate the refolding of urea-denatured dihydrofolate reductase in vitro (15).

Recently, a new member of the Pin1-type PPIases, AtPin1, from the plant Arabidopsis thaliana has been reported (26). AtPin1 lacks an NH2-terminal WW domain but has significant homology to the PPIase domain of Pin1 and as such a strong substrate specificity toward phosphoserine-proline in a two-dimensional NMR spectroscopy PPIase assay (26). However, it has not been described whether AtPin1 has any role in cell cycle progression.

Here we describe the isolation and functional characterization of a Malus domestica Pin1 homologue, MdPin1, which has the characteristic Pin1-type PPIase domain but lacks the NH2-terminal WW domain. In the standard protease-coupled PPIase assay, MdPin1 exhibits the same phosphorylation-specific substrate specificity and can be inhibited by juglone, as is the case for human Pin1. A search in the plant EST data bases reveals that all plant Pin1-type PPIases do not contain a WW domain, but all contain a four-amino acid insertion next to the phospho-specific recognition site of the active site. Interestingly, like Pin1, both MdPin1 and AtPin1 are able to rescue the lethal mitotic phenotype of a temperature-sensitive mutation in the Pin1 homologue ESS1/PTF1 gene in S. cerevisiae. In contrast, deleting the extra four amino acid residues abolished the ability of AtPin1 to rescue the yeast mutation. Finally, Northern blot analysis indicates that expression of MdPin1 is tightly associated with cell division of the plant cell in growing apple fruit in vivo and in suspension cell cultures in vitro. These results have demonstrated for the first time that the function of phosphorylation-specific prolyl isomerases is highly conserved in plants and have further suggested that although plant Pin1-type enzymes do not have a WW domain, they may fulfill the same functions as Pin1 and its homologues do in other organisms.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cloning MdPin1 using PCR-- The template cDNA was synthesized from poly(A) mRNA extracted from apple (M. domestica cv. Granny Smith) fruitlets harvested 2 days after pollination plus gibberellin treatment as described by Dong et al. (32). DNA fragments were amplified from the cDNA using the Expand High Fidelity PCR system (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) with the two degenerative primers MADS-4 (5'-CGTCTAGAATTCATGGCNMGNGGNAARAT) and MADS-5 (5'CGCTCGAGGATCCACRTTRTARTCNCCNYC) (M = AC). The primers were designed according to the conserved amino acid sequences MARGKI in the MADS-box domain and GGDYNV in the COOH-terminal region of an alignment of the three MADS-box genes APETALA3, pMADS1, and Deficiens. The underlined EcoRI and BamHI sites were used for cloning the PCR product. The conditions for the PCR reaction were as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 4 min; then 35 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 60 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 3 min; and a final extension of 5 min at 72 °C. The amplified DNA fragments of ~600 bp were cloned into the Blueskript SK vector (Stratagene, San Diego, CA) using EcoRI and BamHI and sequenced. Using the sequence information, the gene-specific primer PPI-1 (5'-GGCATCGTGGAAGGATCCTGAAGG) was designed. The 3' region of the MdPin1 gene was amplified using PPI-1, and the 3' rapid amplification of cDNA ends primer (5'-GAGAGAGAACTAGTCTCGAG), which anneals to the adapter used in the cDNA library synthesis. The PCR conditions were the same as above. The amplified fragments were cloned into the pGEM-T EASY vector (Promega) and sequenced. A BamHI site in the primer PPI-1 was used to join the 5' and 3' clones to obtain a full-length cDNA. AtPin1 was amplified from A. thaliana using PCR based on a published sequence (26), and its deletion mutant was made using a PCR-based mutagenesis technique and confirmed by sequencing, as described previously (28, 29).

Northern Hybridization-- Total RNA was extracted from young (1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks following hand pollination) and mature apple fruits using the methods of Chang et al. (33) and from cell suspension cultures using Trizol (Life Technologies, Inc.). The cell suspension cultures were derived from the cortex of apple fruit (34) and maintained in liquid medium with 4.5 µM 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (35). Because the cell growth in the liquid culture reaches the stationary phase after 7 days, 40 ml of these cultures were transferred into 100 ml of fresh medium every week to maintain growth. For RNA extraction, aliquots of the cell culture were sampled at day 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, and 11. Northern blots were prepared by transferring 10 µg of RNA from each time point to Hybond-N+ nylon membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) following agarose gel electrophoresis. The Northern blots were probed with [32P]dCTP-labeled MdPin1 cDNA. Membranes were hybridized in 0.5 M NaPO4 buffer (pH 7.2), 1 mM EDTA, 7% SDS at 65 °C and washed using 0.4 × SSC, 0.2% SDS at 65 °C. Autoradiographs were exposed for 2 days at -70 °C.

Peptidyl-Prolyl cis/trans Isomerase Activity Assay-- Recombinant MdPin1 protein was produced by subcloning the MdPin1 cDNA into the pGEX-2T vector. PPIase activity was assayed by monitoring the absorbance of released 4-nitroaniline at 390 nm at 4 °C in triplicate, as described (25). Briefly, enzymes were pre-incubated with substrate in a buffer containing 35 mM HEPES, pH 7.8, 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin for 5 min. The reaction was initiated by the addition of the protease stock solution. Measurement of the bimolecular rate constants kcat/Km for the PPIase-catalyzed isomerization was performed by a protocol modified from Fischer et al. (7). Because [S]0 Km was valid, absorbance data points were fitted to a first-order kinetics. The kcat/Km values were calculated according to the equation kcat/Km = (kobs - ku)/[PPIase], where ku is the first-order rate constant for spontaneous cis/trans isomerization, and kobs is the pseudo-first-order rate constant for cis/trans isomerization in the presence of PPIase. Inhibition of PPIase activity by juglone was performed by pre-incubating enzymes with different concentrations of juglone for 4 h, followed by PPIase assay, as described previously (36).

Expression of MdPin1 in the S. cerevisiae Strain YPM2-- The coding sequence of MdPin1 was cloned into the vector pBC100, which allows for galactose-induced expression of hemagglutinin-tagged proteins, as described previously (11). YPM2 cells were grown overnight in YAPD medium (2% Difco Bacto-peptone, 1% Difco yeast extract, 2% glucose) at 23 °C and then transformed with MdPin1/pBC100 using the polyethylene glycol method (20, 31). The transformed cells were plated onto minimal medium containing 2% glucose but lacking the amino acid leucine to select for transformants and grown at 23 °C for 5-7 days. Colonies were then restreaked at least two times and incubated under the same conditions. For the spotting analysis, single yeast colonies were suspended in TE buffer 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA. The A600 was adjusted to 1, a 10-fold series dilution in TE buffer was made, and 5 µl of each dilution were spotted onto the plates. All plates were made of minimal media without leucine and contained 2% glucose (no induction), a mixture of 2% glucose and 2% galactose (partial induction), or 2% galactose (full induction). The plates were incubated for several days at 23 °C (permissive conditions) or 30 °C (restrictive conditions). The same procedure was used to isolate YPM2 cells expressing human Pin1, its PPIase domain AtPin1, or its deletion mutant. As controls, cells carrying either the pBC100 vector without insert or the construct yESS1/Yep451, which allows for constitutive expression of ESS1, were used. To check for protein expression, YPM2 cells with different pBC100 constructs were grown at 23 °C in minimal media without leucine but with 2% galactose to induce protein expression. The cells were harvested and lysed with glass beads, and 50 µg of total protein extract were separated on a 17.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gel. After Western blotting, the expressed proteins were detected using 12CA5 monoclonal antibody.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Isolation of MdPin1-- The full-length cDNA of M. domestica Pin1 (MdPin1) and the deduced amino acid sequence are shown in Fig. 1. The cDNA was cloned in two steps. First, DNA fragments of ~600 bp were amplified from an apple fruitlet cDNA library using the two degenerated PCR primers MADS-4 and MADS-5. The primers were originally designed to detect APETALA3-like MADS-box genes. After sequencing nine random clones, we found that they contained the same DNA sequence, which had significant sequence homology to a part of the human Pin1 (11). Two clones represent an independent sequence that had an 8-bp deletion in the 5' untranslated region when compared with the other seven sequences (Fig. 1). This indicates that at least two alleles of MdPin1 were expressed in apple fruit tissues. The missing 3' region of MdPin1 was amplified in a second step using the specific primer PPI-1 and a 3' rapid amplification of cDNA ends primer. Four independent PCR fragments were analyzed and found to contain the same sequence that overlapped with the original 600-bp fragments. The full-length cDNA was then assembled by joining the 5' and 3' clones at the BamHI site in the overlapping region.



View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   cDNA and deduced amino acid sequence of MdPin1. Arrows indicate the position of the PCR primers used for the isolation of MdPin1. The 8-bp deletion found in the untranslated 5' region of two of the nine sequences is boxed. The BamHI site used to assemble the full-length cDNA is indicated. The in-frame stop codon upstream of the reading frame is in bold. The mRNA sequence of MdPin1 has been submitted to GenBankTM with the accession number AF209200.

Existence of Multiple Pin1-type PPIase Genes in Plants-- An alignment of the MdPin1 amino acid sequence with homologues of Pin1 from selected organisms is shown in Fig. 2. Pin1 and ESS1 play significant roles in the cell cycle and consist of two functional domains, the WW domain and the PPIase domain. The Pin1 WW domain is a pSer/pThr-Pro-binding module (20), and the PPIase domain catalyzes sequence-specific and phosphorylationdependent prolyl isomerization (25). MdPin1, however, lacks the WW domain and consists only of the Pin1-type PPIase domain (Fig. 2). The absence of the NH2-terminal WW domain in the MdPin1 cDNA is probably not due to a partial sequence, because an in-frame stop codon was identified in the 5' untranslated region. Furthermore, homologues of Pin1-type PPIases, which also lack the NH2-terminal WW domain, have recently been identified in the plants A. thaliana (26) (Fig. 2) and Digitalis lanata (41). MdPin1 has an amino acid sequence identity of 79% to the A. thaliana homologue and of 55% to the PPIase domain of Pin1. A search in the plant EST data bases reveals that the Pin1-type PPIases are present in various plants. Furthermore, there are multiple genes in one organism, such as soybean (Glycine max) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum), which were also noted by Metzner et al. (41). These observations suggest that multiple Pin1-type proteins might also be present in mammalian cells. Interestingly, we also found that all plant enzymes do not have a WW domain but contain a four-amino acid insertion next to the phospho-specific recognition site of the active site (Fig. 2). These four amino acid residues are important for the in vivo function of proteins, as shown below (see Fig. 4).



View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Structural conservation of Pin1-type PPIases from various eukaryotic organisms. MdPin1, M. domestica; AtPin1, A. thaliana; LePin1-1 (GenBankTM accession number AW621939); LePin1-2 (GenBankTM accession number AW945046), L. esculentum; GmPin1-1 (GenBankTM accession number AW308915); GmPin1-2 (GenBankTM accession number AW397670), G. max; HsPin1, human; ScESS1, S. cerevisiae; NcSsp1, N. crassa; AnPin1, A. nidulans. The dashed line indicates the WW domain, and the solid line indicates the PPIase domain. The four-amino acid insertion in the plant proteins is boxed. The arrowhead points to the active site Cys conserved in all Pin1-type PPIases.

Phosphorylation-specific PPIase Activity of MdPin1 and Its Inhibition by Juglone-- Because of the high amino acid homology of MdPin1 to the PPIase domain of human Pin1, which includes the highly conserved amino acids Lys-63, Arg-68, and Arg-69 that have been shown to be critical for the unique substrate specificity of Pin1 (24), we wanted to know if MdPin1 also shows a phosphorylation specificity in a PPIase assay. The results in Table I show that MdPin1 exhibited the same substrate specificity in the standard protease-coupled PPIase assay as Pin1. Namely, MdPin1 prefers acidic residues like glutamate NH2-terminal to the proline. Furthermore, like Pin1, MdPin1 showed an even higher isomerase activity, when a pSer-Pro-containing peptide was used as a substrate, with a specific activity similar to that of Pin1 (Table I). In addition, because juglone has been shown to inhibit the enzymatic activity of many enzymes, including Pin1-type PPIases, by covalently inactivating their active site cysteine residue (36), we examined the effect of juglone on MdPin1. Not surprisingly, juglone inhibited the PPIase activity of MdPin1 in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 3), with a potency similar to that of inhibiting Pin1 or parvulin, as shown previously (36). These results show that MdPin1, although it lacks an NH2-terminal WW domain, belongs to the Pin1-type subfamily of PPIases, which require a phosphorylated amino acid NH2-terminal to the proline in their substrate to efficiently catalyze the isomerase reaction.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Comparison of the substrate specificity of MdPin1, AtPin1, and hPin1
The kcat/Km values of MdPin1, AtPin1, and hPin1 were determined with the protease-coupled PPIase assay as described under "Experimental Procedures." As conformation, specific proteases, alpha -chymotrypsin (succinyl-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-p-nitroanilide, succinyl-Ala-Glu-Pro-Phe-p-nitroanilide) and trypsin (acetyl-Ala-Ala-pSer-Pro-Phe-p-nitro-anilide), were used.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Inhibition of the PPIase activity of MdPin1 by juglone. 100 nM MdPin1 was incubated with different concentrations of juglone, and the PPIase activity toward the peptide succinyl-Ala-Glu-Pro-Phe-p-nitroanilide was measured using the protease-coupled PPIase assay. A, reaction curve of MdPin1 PPIase assays in the absence or presence of juglone. The curves were fitted to a first-order reaction kinetics, with the maximal absorbance at 390 nm being defined as 1.0. B, concentration-dependent inhibition of MdPin1 by juglone. The kcat/Km of a PPIase reaction without juglone was set at 100%. The relative PPIase activity is plotted against the amount of juglone used in the reaction.

Functional Rescue of the Essential ESS1/PTF1 in Yeast by MdPin1 or AtPin1-- In light of the same phosphorylation-specific substrate specificity of Pin1 and MdPin1, we asked whether MdPin1 could perform the function of Pin1 in vivo. To answer this question, we examined whether expression of MdPin1 in the yeast strain YPM2 (12, 13), which carries a temperature-sensitive mutation in the Pin1 homologue ESS1/PTF1, could support growth of YPM2 at the restrictive temperature. The coding sequences of Pin1, the Pin1 PPIase domain, and MdPin1 were cloned into the vector pBC100 under the control of the inducible galactose promoter. The activity of the galactose promoter depends on the carbon source in the medium. The promoter is repressed when glucose is used as the carbon source but induced when galactose is used instead. To examine the relative levels of the expressed proteins, a hemagglutinin epitope tag, which does not affect the function of Pin1 in vivo (11), was inserted at the NH2 termini of all constructs. Immunoblotting analysis of lysates from YPM2 cells transformed with the different constructs using anti-hemagglutinin antibodies showed that all proteins were expressed at similar levels after galactose induction (Fig. 4C). As a positive control, we used YPM2 cells carrying a construct containing the functional ESS1/PTF1 gene, which grew independently on the carbon source at both the permissive and the nonpermissive temperature. As expected, YPM2 cells harboring the different plasmids were able to grow at the permissive temperature on glucose (Fig. 4A) or galactose media (data not shown). All YPM2 cells, with the exception of the positive control, failed to grow on glucose medium when incubated at the restrictive temperature. At the restrictive temperature, however, the same cells were able to grow on glucose/galactose or galactose medium, which allows partial or full induction of the transgene, respectively. These results indicate that MdPin1 is able to perform the essential function in yeast.



View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Functional rescue of the yeast ESS1/PTF1 mutation by plant Pin1s and the critical role of the four-amino acid insertion in the PPIase domain of plant Pin1s. A, functional rescue of the yeast ESS1/PTF1 mutation by MdPin1. YPM2 cells transformed with the MdPin1/pBC100 and hPin1-PPI/pBC100 expression constructs were spotted in a series 10× dilution onto agar plates with glucose, glucose/galactose, or galactose as carbon source. The plates were incubated at 23 °C (permissive) or 30 °C (restrictive). Galactose allows for overexpression of the transgene. Growth of the cells indicates the complementation of the YPM2 mutation. The control was a strain that constitutively expresses ESS1 (yESS1/Yep451) and the empty vector pBC100. B, functional rescue of the yeast ESS1/PTF1 mutation by AtPin1 and its deletion mutant. YPM2 cells transformed with Pin1, AtPin1, and AtPin1Delta expression constructs were spotted onto agar plates with glucose/galactose or galactose as carbon source. The plates were incubated at the permissive or restrictive temperature. AtPin1Delta contains a deletion of four amino acid residues that are present in plant Pin1s but not other Pin1s with a WW domain, as shown in Fig. 2. C, similar expression of transgenes in yeast cells. YPM2 strains stably transformed with various Pin1 constructs were subjected to immunoblotting analysis using 12CA5 antibody specific to the hemagglutinin tag inserted at the NH2 terminus of all transgenes. HA, hemagglutinin.

We have demonstrated that the WW domain is normally required for Pin1 to perform its essential function in yeast (20) and that the Pin1 PPIase domain alone is able to rescue the yeast mutation only when it is overexpressed (31), as shown in Fig. 4A. These results indicate that the phosphoserine/phosphothreonine-binding module WW domain is important for targeting Pin1 to its substrates. However, the finding that MdPin1 was able to support the growth of YPM2 cells to the same extent as full-length Pin1 either at partially or fully induced conditions was surprising. To confirm this result, we asked whether other plant Pin1-type PPIases would have the similar function and chose AtPin1. As shown in Fig. 4B, AtPin1 was able to support the growth of YPM2 cells in a manner similar to full-length Pin1 on glucose/galactose or galactose media. These results confirm that plant Pin1-type PPIases are indeed able to function like full-length Pin1 in yeast, although they do not have a WW domain. After comparing sequences of Pin1-type genes from plants and other organisms, we found that the plant Pin1s contain an extra four-amino acid insertion in their PPIase domains. To examine the importance of this insertion, we generated a mutant AtPin1Delta , from which the four amino acid residues were deleted. When AtPin1Delta was expressed in the YPM2 strain, it was expressed at a level similar to that of wild type AtPin1 protein (Fig. 4C). However, AtPin1Delta failed to support the growth of YPM2 cells at partially induced conditions (Glu/Gal media) but was able to fully support cell growth at fully induced conditions (Gal media) (Fig. 4B), a phenotype almost identical to that of the Pin1 PPIase domain alone (Fig. 4A). These results indicate that these extra four amino acids in AtPin1 are apparently able to substitute for the function of the WW domain, at least in this yeast functional assay.

Cell Division Regulated Expression of MdPin1 in Plants-- Because MdPin1 is able to rescue the temperature-sensitive phenotype of YPM2, the above results suggest that MdPin1 may also be involved in the regulation of cell division in apples. To examine this possibility, we analyzed the expression of MdPin1 in apple fruit tissues at progressive development stages and cell suspension cultures to determine whether the expression of MdPin1 is correlated to plant cell division. Northern blot analysis revealed that MdPin1 was expressed in 1-3-week-old fruit but not in 4-week-old or mature fruit (Fig. 5A). Previous research into apple fruit development suggested that fruit growth in the first 3-4 weeks resulted primarily from cell division, whereas the subsequent growth is mainly based on cell enlargement (37). It was also recently shown that the major cell division period in "Braeburn" apple fruit occurs in the first 3-4 weeks after pollination (38). In this respect, the Northern data indicates that the MdPin1 expression is associated with cell division in apple fruit development. To further support this observation, we examined the MdPin1 expression in cultured apple cells. Significant levels of MdPin1 transcripts were detected in 2-5-day-old cultures but not in 7-11-day-old cultures (Fig. 5B). It is important to note that under our conditions, the growth in the suspension cell cultures reaches a stationary level after 7 days (data not shown), i.e. cell division stops. Similar to the experiments using the apple fruit, MdPin1 expression in suspension-cultured cells was only detected in dividing cells. These data therefore further support the conclusion that MdPin1 expression is tightly associated with cell division of the plant cell.



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Association of MdPin1 expression with cell division during apple fruit development in vivo and in cell cultures in vitro. 10 µg of total RNA was used for each lane of the Northern blot. As a probe, [32P]dCTP-labeled MdPin1 cDNA was used. A, RNA extracted from fruitlets in different stages of their development (1-4 weeks and mature (Ma) fruit). B, RNA extracted from cell suspension cultures after 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, and 11 days of growth.



    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

This paper describes the isolation and characterization of MdPin1, a new member of the Pin1-type PPIases from M. domestica, and also demonstrates the functional conservation of phosphorylation-specific PPIases in plants. MdPin1 consists only of a PPIase domain, which shows a high homology to other members of the Pin1-type PPIases and exhibits phosphorylation-specific PPIase activity similar to Pin1. Interestingly, there are multiple Pin1-type PPIases present in plant EST data bases, even within one organism, and all do not have a WW domain but contain a four-amino acid insertion next to the phospho-specific recognition site of the active site in their PPIase domains. Importantly, both MdPin1 and AtPin1 are able to rescue the temperature-sensitive mutant phenotype of the yeast ESS1/PTF1 gene under partially induced conditions, as is the case for Pin1. However, deleting the extra four amino acid residues abolished the ability of AtPin1 to rescue the yeast mutation under the same conditions, indicating the critical role of these extra amino acids for the plant enzyme in vivo. Finally, expression of MdPin1 is tightly associated with cell division during apple fruit development in vivo and during cell cultures in vitro. These results have demonstrated that phosphorylation-specific PPIases are highly conserved functionally from plants to humans and also suggest that despite the absence of the WW domain, plant Pin1-type enzymes may fulfill the same functions as Pin1 and its homologues do in other organisms.

MdPin1 does not have a WW domain at the NH2 terminus, in contrast to human Pin1 and its homologues from various other organisms (Fig. 2). Furthermore, two other Pin1-type PPIases from plants, AtPin1 (26) and DlPin1 (DlPar13) (41), also lack the WW domain. The WW domain of Pin1 specifically interacts with phosphoserine- or phosphothreonine-proline motifs and is normally essential for human Pin1 to perform its biological function (20). Furthermore, Pin1 also binds Alzheimer's associated phosphorylated tau protein via its WW domain and restores its biological activity, which also requires the PPIase activity of Pin1 (29). Moreover, neither the WW domain nor the PPIase domain alone is sufficient to rescue the yeast mitotic phenotype under normal expression conditions. However, when overexpressed, only the PPIase domain, but not the WW domain, can rescue the yeast mutation (31). These results indicate that although the WW domain of Pin1 is normally required for targeting Pin1 to its substrates, the PPIase domain performs the essential function (31). Although neither MdPin1 nor AtPin1 contains a WW domain (Fig. 2), both enzymes are able to carry out the essential mitotic function in yeast (Fig. 4). These results further support the notion that it is the PPIase domain that carries out the essential function of Pin1 in vivo.

MdPin1 seems to play a role in the plant cell cycle similar to that of hPin1 and its homologues in other eukaryotic cells. Our results have shown that the presence of MdPin1 transcripts in apple cells is tightly associated with cell division. Developing fruits show MdPin1 expression only for up to 3 weeks, when the division of the fruit cells stops (Fig. 5A), and the continuing growth of the fruits is achieved primarily by cell enlargement (37). This result is consistent with the absence of a mitotic regulator like MdPin1, whose RNA transcripts are no longer detected at this later time point. Further support for this model comes from our studies using apple suspension cell cultures. After transferring the cells to fresh medium, cell growth starts, and the cell number increases gradually because of cell division. After 7 days the culture reaches a stationary state without cell division. As can be seen in the Northern blots of these cultures (Fig. 5B), the appearance of the MdPin1 transcript exactly reflects the growth stages. MdPin1 mRNA can be detected as long as the cells divide but not when the culture reaches the stationary state. These results suggest that MdPin1 probably plays an important role in cell cycle progression in apples, as does Pin1 in vertebrate and yeast cells.

Progression through the cell cycle is regulated by conserved cyclin-dependent kinases in both plant and mammalian cells. Cyclin-dependent kinases phosphorylate proteins on Ser/Thr-Pro motifs and probably create binding sites for Pin1 (21). The phosphorylated proteins that Pin1 binds to are also recognized by the MPM2 antibody (25), which was developed using total mitotic extract from HeLa cells (39). Interestingly, MPM2 antibody has also been shown to interact with a similar subset of mitosis-specific phosphoproteins both in mammals and plants (40). The conservation of cyclin-dependent kinases and MPM2 antigens in mammals and plants indicates that the basic cell cycle regulation is similar and that the target proteins for Pin1 are probably conserved between humans and plants. We have now shown that two different plant Pin1-type PPIases, MdPin1 and AtPin1, like human Pin1, can rescue the yeast strain YPM2 at the nonpermissive temperature (Fig. 3A). YPM2 has a temperature-sensitive mutation in the ESS1/PTF1 gene that arrests cells in mitosis at the nonpermissive temperature. Together with the findings that expression of MdPin1 is cell division-dependent, these results have demonstrated for the first time that phosphorylation-specific PPIases are functionally conserved in yeast, mammalian, and plant cells.

An interesting question is why all the known members of the Pin1-type PPIases in plants do not have a WW domain. The simplest explanation would be that the WW domain-containing Pin1-type PPIases have not yet been identified, which may be clarified when the Arabidopsis genome is fully sequenced. However, the more likely explanation is that the PPIase domain of plant Pin1-type enzymes has a much higher affinity to its substrates than does the PPIase domain of Pin1, due to some sequence differences. Indeed, there are four additional amino acids inserted at the phosphorylation-specific substrate recognition site in the catalytic domain of all known plant Pin1-type PPIases (Fig. 2) (24). More importantly, although AtPin1 can rescue the yeast mutation either under partially induced or fully induced conditions, as is the case for Pin1, when these extra four amino acids are deleted, the mutant AtPin1Delta can rescue the yeast mutation only under fully induced, but not under partially induced, conditions (Fig. 4B). These phenotypes of AtPin1Delta are almost identical to those of the Pin1 PPIase domain alone, as shown previously (31; also see Fig. 4A). These results indicate that these extra four amino acids somehow convert AtPin1 to function like full-length Pin1 at least in yeast, suggesting that they may substitute for the function of the WW domain. Because these four amino acid residues are next to the phospho-specific recognition site of the active site, it is possible that they play an important role in mediating the substrate interaction for plant Pin1-type PPIases. Further studies on identifying the plant Pin1 substrates and elucidating their biological functions will help to understand the role of phosphorylation-dependent prolyl isomerization in controlling cell growth in plants.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Dr. Ian Ferguson for providing the apple cell suspension cultures.


    Note Added in Proof

Due to some recent publications (Chao, S. H., Greenleaf, A. L., and Price, D. H. (2001) Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 767-773; Rippmann, J. F., Hobbie, S., Daiber, C., Guilliard, B., Bauer, M., Birk, J., Nar, H., Garin-Chesa, P., Rettig, W. J., and Schnapp, A. (2000) Cell Growth Differ. 11, 409-416), it is necessary to clarify the role of juglone as an inhibitor of Pin1. Juglone nonspecifically and irreversibly modifies sulfhydryl groups in proteins. In contrast to cyclophilins and FK506-binding proteins, members of the Pin1 subfamily have a cysteine in their active site, so that their activity can be inhibited by juglone in vitro. However, juglone also inhibits many other proteins and enzymes, some even with several hundred-fold lower Ki values than that of Pin1. Therefore, juglone is unlikely to be a Pin1-specific inhibitor in vivo.


    FOOTNOTES

* This research was supported by the New Zealand Foundation for Research, Science, and Technology (C06411) and by National Institutes of Health Grants R01GM56230 and GM58556 (to K. P. L.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF209200.

An Ernst Schering Research Foundation Fellow.

|| A Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Fellow.

** A Pew Scholar and a Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Scholar. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, HIM 1047, 330 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA 02215. Tel.: 617-667-4143; Fax: 617-667-0610; E-mail: klu@caregroup.harvard.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 15, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M007006200


    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: PPIase, peptidyl prolyl cis/trans isomerase; p, phospho; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; bp, base pair(s); EST, expressed sequence tag.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES


1. Galat, A. (1993) Eur. J. Biochem. 216, 689-707[Abstract]
2. Schmid, F. X. (1995) Curr. Biol. 5, 993-994[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Hunter, T. (1998) Cell 92, 141-143[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Matouschek, A., Rospert, S., Schmid, K., Glick, B. S., and Schatz, G. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 6319-6323[Abstract]
5. Rassow, J., Mohrs, K., Koidl, S., Barthelmess, I. B., Pfanner, N., and Tropschug, M. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 2654-2662[Abstract]
6. Schreiber, S. L. (1991) Science 251, 283-287[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Fischer, G. (1994) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 33, 1415-1436
8. Liu, J., Farmer, J. D., Jr., Lane, W. S., Friedman, J., Weissman, I., and Schreiber, S. L. (1991) Cell 66, 807-815[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Dolinski, K., Muir, S., Cardenas, M., and Heitman, J. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 13093-13098[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Hanes, S. D., Shank, P. R., and Bostian, K. A. (1989) Yeast 5, 55-72[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Lu, K. P., Hanes, S. D., and Hunter, T. (1996) Nature 380, 544-547[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Hani, J., Stumpf, G., and Domdey, H. (1995) FEBS Lett. 365, 198-202[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Hani, J., Schelbert, B., Bernhardt, A., Domdey, H., Fischer, G., Wiebauer, K., and Rahfeld, J. U. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 108-116[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Maleszka, R., Hanes, S. D., Hackett, R. L., de Couet, H. G., and Miklos, G. L. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 447-451[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Kops, O., Eckerskorn, C., Hottenrott, S., Fischer, G., Mi, H., and Tropschug, M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 31971-31976[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Winkler, K. E., Swenson, K. I., Kornbluth, S., and Means, A. R. (2000) Science 287, 1644-1647[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Crenshaw, D. G., Yang, J., Means, A. R., and Kornbluth, S. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 1315-1327[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Sudol, M., Chen, H. I., Bougeret, C., Einbond, A., and Bork, P. (1995) FEBS Lett. 369, 67-71[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Sudol, M. (1996) Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 65, 113-132[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Lu, P. J., Zhou, X. Z., Shen, M., and Lu, K. P. (1999) Science 283, 1325-1328[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Zhou, X. Z., Lu, P.-J., Wulf, G., and Lu, K. P. (1999) Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 56, 788-806[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Rahfeld, J. U., Rucknagel, K. P., Schelbert, B., Ludwig, B., Hacker, J., Mann, K., and Fischer, G. (1994) FEBS Lett. 352, 180-184[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Uchida, T., Fujimori, F., Tradler, T., Fischer, G., and Rahfeld, J. U. (1999) FEBS Lett. 446, 278-282[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Ranganathan, R., Lu, K. P., Hunter, T., and Noel, J. P. (1997) Cell 89, 875-886[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Yaffe, M. B., Schutkowski, M., Shen, M., Zhou, X. Z., Stukenberg, P. T., Rahfeld, J. U., Xu, J., Kuang, J., Kirschner, M. W., Fischer, G., Cantley, L. C., and Lu, K. P. (1997) Science 278, 1957-1960[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Landrieu, I., De Veylder, L., Fruchart, J. S., Odaert, B., Casteels, P., Portetelle, D., Van Montagu, M., Inze, D., and Lippens, G. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 10577-10581[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Schutkowski, M., Bernhardt, A., Zhou, X. Z., Shen, M., Reimer, U., Rahfeld, J. U., Lu, K. P., and Fischer, G. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 5566-5575[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Shen, M., Stukenberg, P. T., Kirschner, M. W., and Lu, K. P. (1998) Genes Dev. 12, 706-720[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Lu, P. J., Wulf, G., Zhou, X. Z., Davies, P., and Lu, K. P. (1999) Nature 399, 784-788[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Wu, X., Wilcox, C. B., Devasahayam, G., Hackett, R. L., Arevalo-Rodriguez, M., Cardenas, M. E., Heitman, J., and Hanes, S. D. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 3727-3738[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Zhou, X. Z., Kops, O., Werner, A., Lu, P.-J., Shen, M., Stoller, G., Küllertz, G., Stark, M., Fischer, G., and Lu, K. P. (2000) Mol. Cell 6, 873-883[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Dong, Y. H., Kvarnheden, A., Yao, J. L., Sutherland, P., Atkinson, R. G., Morris, B. A., and Gardner, R. C. (1998) Sex. Plant Reprod. 11, 277-283[CrossRef]
33. Chang, S., Puryear, J., and Cairney, J. (1993) Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 11, 113-116
34. Barker, L. D. P., Templeton, M. D., and Fergueson, I. B. (1998) Planta 207, 197-204[CrossRef]
35. Codron, H., Latche, A., Pech, B., Nebie, B., and Fallot, J. (1977) Plant Sci. Lett. 17, 29-35
36. Hennig, L., Christner, C., Kipping, M., Schelbert, B., Rucknagel, K. P., Grabley, S., Kullertz, G., and Fischer, G. (1988) Biochemistry 37, 5953-5960[CrossRef]
37. Jackson, D. (1986) Temperate and Subtropical Fruit , Butterworths of New Zealand Ltd., Wellington, New Zealand
38. Percy, A. E., O'Brien, I. E. W., Jameson, P. E., Melton, L. D., MacRae, E. A., and Redgwell, R. J. (1996) Physiol. Plant. 96, 43-50[CrossRef]
39. Davis, F. M., Tsao, T. Y., Fowler, S. K., and Rao, P. N. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 80, 2926-2930[Abstract]
40. Traas, J., Beeven, A., Doonan, J., Cordewener, J., and Shaw, P. (1992) Plant J. 2, 723-732
41. Metzner, M., Stoller, G., Rücknagel, K. P., Lu, K. P., Fischer, G., Luckner, M., and Küllertz, G. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 13524-13529[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.