Cloning, Expression, and Up-regulation of Inducible Rat Prostaglandin E Synthase during Lipopolysaccharide-induced Pyresis and Adjuvant-induced Arthritis*

Joseph A. ManciniDagger §, Katherine BloodDagger , Jocelyne GuayDagger , Robert Gordon, David ClaveauDagger , Chi-Chung Chan, and Denis RiendeauDagger

From the Departments of Dagger  Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and  Pharmacology, Merck Frosst Centre for Therapeutic Research, Kirkland, Quebec H9R 4P8, Canada

Received for publication, July 31, 2000, and in revised form, November 1, 2000



    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We have cloned and expressed the inducible form of prostaglandin (PG) E synthase from rat and characterized its regulation of expression in several tissues after in vivo lipopoylsaccharide (LPS) challenge. The rat PGE synthase is 80% identical to the human enzyme at the amino acid level and catalyzes the conversion of PGH2 to PGE2 when overexpressed in Chinese hamster ovary K1 (CHO-K1) cells. PGE synthase activity was measured using [3H]PGH2 as substrate and stannous chloride to terminate the reaction and convert all unreacted unstable PGH2 to PGF2alpha before high pressure liquid chromatography analysis. We assessed the induction of PGE synthase in tissues from Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats after LPS-induced pyresis in vivo. Rat PGE synthase was up-regulated at the mRNA level in lung, colon, brain, heart, testis, spleen, and seminal vesicles. Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 and interleukin 1beta were also up-regulated in these tissues, although to different extents than PGE synthase. PGE synthase and COX-2 were also up-regulated to the greatest extent in a rat model of adjuvant-induced arthritis. The RNA induction of PGE synthase in lung and the adjuvant-treated paw correlated with a 3.8- and 16-fold induction of protein seen in these tissues by immunoblot analysis. Because PGE synthase is a member of the membrane-associated proteins in eicosanoid and glutathione metabolism (MAPEG) family, of which leukotriene (LT) C4 synthase and 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein are also members, we tested the effect of LTC4 and the 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein inhibitor MK-886 on PGE synthase activity. LTC4 and MK-886 were found to inhibit the activity with IC50 values of 1.2 and 3.2 µM, respectively. The results demonstrate that PGE synthase is up-regulated in vivo after LPS or adjuvant administration and suggest that this is a key enzyme involved in the formation of PGE2 in COX-2-mediated inflammatory and pyretic responses.



    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Prostaglandin (PG)1 E2 is a major prostanoid derived from PGH2 that can be generated by either degradation of PGH2 or by a reaction catalyzed by PGE synthase (1). PGH2 is formed by the bis-oxygenation of arachidonic acid catalyzed by either isoform cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 or COX-2 and serves as the precursor to all prostanoid products formed, including prostaglandins, prostacyclin, and thromboxanes (2-4). Prostanoids have diverse biological functions including the maintenance of vascular and kidney homeostasis, relaxation and contraction of smooth muscle, regulation of gastrointestinal secretion and motility, and induction of sleep, pain, and inflammation (5). Within all these varied roles, data on COX-2 regulation of expression and the pharmacological effects of selective COX-2 inhibitors have delineated that COX-2 is the major isoform responsible for synthesis of inflammatory and pyretic prostanoids (2-4, 6). In addition, studies with a specific monoclonal antibody to PGE2 indicated that the major prostanoid that contributes to inflammation is PGE2 (7). Therefore, it is compelling to suggest that an inducible PGE synthase may provide a novel therapeutic target for arthritis and pain downstream of COX-2 activity.

PGE synthase is a member of the membrane-associated proteins in eicosanoid and glutathione metabolism (MAPEG) superfamily, which consists of six human proteins with divergent functions (8). The initial discovery of this family came to fruition through work on the leukotriene pathway. Leukotrienes are derived from arachidonic acid through the 5-lipoxygenase pathway (9) and act as potent mediators of inflammation and bronchoconstriction (10). The initial discovery of the MAPEG family was initiated upon the cloning of LTC4 synthase, which was found to be 31% identical to 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein (an arachidonate transfer protein required for leukotriene biosynthesis) (11, 12). The search for new members led to the discovery of three novel proteins (microsomal glutathione transferases (MGSTs) 2 and 3 (13, 14) and PGE synthase) and one preexisting enzyme (MGST1). Four members of this family can conjugate glutathione to lipophilic substrates; however, one of these enzymes, LTC4 synthase, conjugates glutathione specifically to LTA4 to form the potent bronchoconstrictive leukotriene C4. The best-characterized member is MGST1, which is involved in cellular detoxification of various xenobiotics (15). MGST2 and MGST3 can both conjugate glutathione to LTA4, whereas only MGST2 can conjugate glutathione to the classical glutathione transferase substrate 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene. Both MGST2 and MGST3 also possess a glutathione-dependent peroxidase activity with hydroperoxy fatty acid substrates (14). The final member of this family, PGE synthase, which has the highest sequence identity to MGST1, could not conjugate glutathione to either LTA4 or 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene and, interestingly, was found to possess PGE synthase activity (1).

The cDNA for human PGE synthase has recently been cloned, and the enzyme has been shown to be inducible by IL-1beta in the lung carcinoma-derived A549 cell line (1). The corresponding rat sequence has been cloned and shown to be up-regulated during beta -amyloid treatment of rat brain (16). In the present study, we present the cloning, expression, and demonstration of activity for rat PGE synthase. In addition, to investigate the role that PGE synthase might play in an inflammatory process, we have determined the inducibility and tissue distribution of PGE synthase RNA in comparison with COX-2 in LPS-induced pyresis in rats and adjuvant-treated rat paws. We also present the first induction of PGE synthase at the protein level in the latter two models of inflammation.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

CHO-K1 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture collection. Cell culture media, serum, antibiotics, and LipofectAMINE were purchased from Life Technologies, Inc. Oligonucleotides and a polyclonal peptide antisera to human PGE synthase (1) were obtained from Research Genetics (Huntsville, AL). Restriction enzymes, Pwo polymerase, ligase, and Complete protease mixture were obtained from Roche Molecular Biochemicals. PGH2, [3H]PGH2, PGF2alpha , PGE2, PGD2, LTC4, and a partially purified PGE synthase antibody were purchased from Cayman Chemical Co. (Ann Arbor, MI). Glutathione and stannous chloride were obtained from Sigma and BDH, Inc., respectively. [32P]dCTP was obtained from PerkinElmer Life Sciences, and the random prime kit for generating radiolabeled cDNA was obtained from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech.

Identification, Cloning, and Expression of Rat PGE Synthase-- The human PGE synthase protein sequence was used to perform a BLAST search of the GenBankTM expressed sequence tag rodent data base. A rat expressed sequence tag was identified with significant sequence identity to the human enzyme and with the accession number AI136526. The expressed sequence tag clone was obtained from Research Genetics and subcloned into the EcoRI-NotI site of pcDNA 3.1 (Invitrogen). The clone was sequenced using an Applied Biosystems 373A automated sequencer and dye terminator reactions as described by the manufacturer's instructions. The clone was full length and was therefore transfected into CHO-K1 cells using LipofectAMINE 2000 (Life Technologies, Inc.). Cells were harvested 24-48 h after transfection and resuspended in 15 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.25 M sucrose, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM glutathione. Resuspended cells were sonicated four times for 30 s at 4 °C using a Cole Parmer 4710 Ultrasonic Homogenizer at 70% duty cycle. Disrupted cells were subjected to centrifugation at 5,000 × g for 10 min, and the supernatant was further centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 1.5 h. The membrane pellet obtained was resuspended in 10 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.0), 20% glycerol, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM glutathione. Both mock and human PGE synthase in pcDNA 3.1-transfected cells were prepared in a similar fashion. Protein concentrations were determined using the Coomassie protein assay (Pierce) as described by the manufacturer.

Immunoblot Analysis-- Protein samples were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis using 4-20% gradient gels supplied by Novex (Invitrogen) and transferred electrophoretically to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes using a Novex immunoblot transfer apparatus according to the manufacturer's instructions. Nonspecific sites on polyvinylidene difluoride membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in PBST for 1 h at room temperature, followed by two 5-min washes with PBST. The polyvinylidene difluoride membrane was probed with a 1:500-1:5,000 dilution of PGE synthase antisera in 1% milk/PBST for 1 h. A polyclonal peptide antisera raised to the synthetic peptide as described by Jakobsson et al. (1) or an affinity-purified antibody purchased from Cayman Chemical Co. raised to residues 59-75 of human PGE synthase was utilized for immunoblot analysis. The blot was washed four times with PBST for 15 min each and then incubated with a 1:3,000 dilution of horseradish peroxidase-linked anti-rabbit IgG antibody (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in 1% milk/PBST for 1 h. The blot was washed four times with PBST for 15 min each, and immunodetection was performed using Renaissance Western blot Chemiluminescence Reagent (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Detection and quantitative analysis were performed using a Fuji Film LAS-1000 charge-coupled device and Image gauge software.

In Vivo Induction of PGE Synthase-- All procedures used in the in vivo assays were approved by the Animal Care Committee at the Merck Frosst Center for Therapeutic Research (Kirkland, Quebec, Canada) according to guidelines established by the Canadian Council on Animal Care.

Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats were injected with a single i.v. bolus of 0.12 mg/kg LPS or saline vehicle control, and 7 h after infusion, the rats were sacrificed, and tissues were perfused with saline and dissected. The adjuvant-induced arthritis model was performed with two groups of four Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats each and an intradermal injection of 0.5 mg of Mycobacterium butyricum in mineral oil into the left hind foot pad as described previously (17). The tissues were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and used for RNA preparation. mRNA was isolated from the tissues using the kit reagents of the Fast Track 2.0 mRNA Isolation Kit (Invitrogen). RNA concentration was quantified by spectrophotometry. mRNA (0.1 µg) was reverse-transcribed into cDNA with random hexamers using kit reagents and following the manufacturer's recommended conditions (GeneAmp RNA PCR Kit; PerkinElmer Life Sciences). The RT reaction was incubated in a thermal cycler (GeneAmp PCR System 9600, Perkin Elmer Cetus) at 62 °C for 1 h and 94 °C for 5 min and then cooled to 4 °C. Half of the reverse-transcribed cDNA product (10 µl) was amplified by PCR in a 100 µl reaction. The reaction contained 0.2 µM deoxynucleotide triphosphates, 5 units of Taq polymerase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), and either 0.3 µM primers (PGE synthase) or 0.2 µM primers (beta -actin, COX-2, and IL-1beta ). The PCR reaction was incubated at 94 °C for 5 min and then amplified for 25-50 cycles using the reaction conditions as follows: 94 °C for 30 s, 65 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min. After amplification, the reactions were incubated at 72 °C for 7 min and then cooled to 4 °C. Synthetic DNA amplimers for PGE synthase were as follows: sense, 5'-ATGACTTCCCTGGGTTTGGTGATGGAG-3'; and antisense, 5'-ACAGATGGTGGGCCACTTCCCAGA-3'. Synthetic primers for beta -actin were ordered from CLONTECH. Synthetic DNA amplimers for COX-2 were as follows: sense, 5'-GACGATCAAGATAGTGATCGAA-3'; and antisense, 5'-AAGCGTTTGCGGTACTCATTG-3'. Synthetic DNA amplimers for IL-1beta were as follows: sense, 5'-GCACCTTCTTTTCCTTCATC-3'; and antisense, 5'-CTGATGTACCAGTTGGGGAA-3'. Reverse transcription-PCR products were analyzed by 1% (w/v) agarose gel electrophoresis. PGE synthase RT-PCR products were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane and analyzed by Southern blot. The full-length PGE synthase cDNA was labeled with [alpha -32P]dCTP using the T7QuickPrime Kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Hybridization was performed in 5× SSC, 5× Denhardt's solution, 0.1% SDS, and 0.1 mg/ml denatured salmon sperm DNA for 18 h at 42 °C. Blots were washed to a final stringency of 0.5× SSC, 0.5% SDS at 65 °C followed by autoradiography at -80 °C. cDNA from PGE synthase- or COX-2-transformed bacteria was used as a template, with PGE synthase and COX-2 primers respectively, and served as a positive control. Comparative analysis between the amount of PCR product and the amount of initial template demonstrated that PCR amplification was in the linear range at the conditions utilized for each amplification. Detection and quantitative analysis were performed using a Fuji Film LAS-1000 charge-coupled device and Image gauge software.

PGE Synthase Assay-- Microsomal membranes from mock-transfected CHO-K1 cells or rat PGE synthase-transfected CHO-K1 cells were diluted into 0.1 M potassium phosphate, pH 7.0, and 2.5 mM reduced glutathione. The reaction was initiated with 10 µM PGH2 and 0.2 µCi of [3H]PGH2 (100 µCi/mmol) and terminated with an equal volume of acetonitrile/H2O/acetic acid (35%:65%:0.1%) containing 1 mg/ml stannous chloride. Samples were analyzed by reverse phase HPLC using a Waters Nova-Pak C18 column (3.9 × 150 mm, 4 µm particle size) and a Waters 625 HPLC system with a Beckman 171 radioisotope detector. Radiolabeled standards, [3H]PGE2 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), [3H]PGF2alpha (PerkinElmer Life Sciences), and [3H]PGD2 (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) were utilized for determining the separation by reverse phase HPLC and for quantitation of product formation of PGE2.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Identification and Expression of Rat PGE Synthase-- The GenBankTM expressed sequence tag data base was searched using the sequence of the previously identified human PGE synthase, and a clone with high sequence identity from rats was identified. The clone was obtained, isolated, and sequenced (Fig. 1). The amino acid sequence of rat PGE synthase is 80% identical to that of the human PGE synthase. The divergences occur mainly at the N- and C-terminal regions of the proteins. The sequence was subcloned into a pcDNA 3.1 vector, and the recombinant construct was transfected into CHO-K1 cells. Membrane preparations of recombinant protein were prepared from CHO-K1 cells transfected with either mock vector, rat PGE synthase, or human PGE synthase. The samples were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and analyzed by immunoblot with peptide antisera to human PGE synthase. The rat PGE synthase-transfected cells contained an immunoreactive band of 17 kDa that comigrates with human PGE synthase, whereas the mock-transfected cells (Fig. 2) showed no detectable signal.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Nucleotide sequence and the predicted translation of rat PGE synthase. The open reading frame of rat PGE synthase is presented (GenBankTM accession number AF280967). The cDNA sequence presented was subcloned into pcDNA 3.1 for expression in CHO-K1 cells.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Immunoblot analysis of PGE synthase expressed transiently in CHO cells. Rat and human PGE synthase subcloned into pcDNA3.1 and vector alone were separately transfected into CHO-K1 cells. Twenty-four h after transfection, cells were harvested, and 100,000 × g membrane fractions were prepared. Protein samples (5 µg/lane) were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on 4-20% gradient gels (Novex) and subjected to immunoblotting with a polyclonal peptide antisera (1) after electrophoretic transfer to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. Detection was performed using enhanced chemiluminescence (PerkinElmer Life Sciences). The position of migration of molecular mass standards (Life Technologies, Inc.) is depicted.

The rat PGE synthase membrane preparation was tested for enzymatic activity using [3H]PGH2 as substrate and separation of the reaction products by reverse phase HPLC. The assay was comprised of 10 µg/ml membrane protein in 100 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.0, and 2.5 mM glutathione and initiated with 10 µM PGH2 and 0.2 µCi of [3H]PGH2 (100 µCi/µmol). The reaction was terminated with 1 mg/ml stannous chloride in HPLC running buffer to quantitatively convert the remaining PGH2 substrate to PGF2alpha . In assays with mock preparations, PGF2alpha was the predominant product, with low amounts of PGE2 and PGD2. In contrast, rat PGE synthase extracts formed primarily PGE2, with concomitant decreases in PGF2alpha and PGD2. These results demonstrate that this cloned sequence encodes for a protein with PGE synthase activity. A time course of product formation was performed using the same conditions mentioned above. The conversion of PGH2 to PGE2 with rat PGE synthase was rapid, and the reaction reached a plateau after 1 min, mainly due to substrate depletion (Fig. 3). Product accumulation obtained under these conditions was maximal at 1 µmol PGE2/mg protein/min. The time course of the reaction is similar to that reported for human PGE synthase, with product formation for the rat enzyme being 3.6-fold higher than the activity reported for the human microsomal enzyme preparation. The mock-transfected cells show a small amount of PGH2 conversion to PGE2, which only increases slightly with incubation time and corresponds mainly to a nonenzymatic degradation of PGH2.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Time course of product formation. Membrane preparations of mock-transfected or rat PGE synthase-transfected CHO cells were incubated with [3H]PGH2 for various time periods (0-5 min). The reaction was terminated with the addition of 1 mg/ml stannous chloride in 35% acetonitrile and 0.1% acetic acid. The reaction products were subjected to reverse phase HPLC as described under "Materials and Methods." The retention times of the prostaglandin products were verified using authentic [3H]PGE2, [3H]PGF2alpha , and [3H]PGD2 standards.

Induction of Rat PGE Synthase with in Vivo LPS Challenge-- Prostaglandin E2 levels have been shown to be elevated upon LPS challenge in rat brain with a concomitant induction of cyclooxygenase-2 (18). We designed a study to compare the inducibility of PGE synthase, COX-2, and IL-1beta in Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats after LPS treatment. Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with 0.12 mg/kg LPS by a single i.v. bolus, and 7 h after challenge, various tissues were collected for analyses by quantitative PCR. This dose of LPS causes a significant elevation of body temperature of rats (from 36.4 ± 0.3 °C to 38.5 ± 0.2 °C). Characterization of eight major tissues from vehicle- or LPS-treated rats by RT-PCR followed by Southern blot analysis demonstrated that lung, brain, heart, spleen, and seminal vesicles contain increased mRNA levels of PGE synthase as compared with the vehicle-treated control animals (Figs. 4 and 5). RT-PCR was also performed for COX-2 and IL-1beta , and the results were compared with those for PGE synthase in these tissues. COX-2 was also up-regulated in lung, brain, and heart tissues, as seen for PGE synthase, with a weak and not clearly detectable COX-2 induction in spleen and seminal vesicle. COX-2 was also present in non-LPS-treated rat brain, and this observation is consistent with constitutive expression of COX-2 in this tissue (19). IL-1beta was significantly up-regulated in lung, spleen, and seminal vesicle, and a slight induction was also detected in brain and heart. The lung seems to be very responsive to LPS administration, with a significant induction of PGE synthase, COX-2, and IL-1beta mRNA.



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Induction of rat PGE synthase after in vivo LPS challenge. Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats were challenged with either saline vehicle control (-LPS) or a single i.v. bolus of 0.12 mg/kg LPS (+LPS) and sacrificed 7 h after challenge. Tissues were removed after saline perfusion, and mRNA templates were isolated. RT-PCR amplification was performed, and the samples were electrophoresed and transferred to nitrocellulose. The membrane was probed for PGE synthase using a 32P-labeled cDNA encoding the open reading frame of rat PGE synthase.



View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Induction of PGE synthase, COX-2, and IL-1beta in LPS-challenged rat tissues. Messenger RNA was prepared from tissues of control- or LPS-treated rats as described in Fig. 4. RT-PCR was performed for PGE synthase, COX-2, and IL-1beta during the linear phase of amplification. beta -Actin was used as the control to compare non-LPS-treated and LPS-treated rat tissues. The signal obtained is from RT-PCR samples separated on 1% agarose gels and stained with 0.5% ethidium bromide.

Prostaglandins play an important role in the maintenance of the integrity of the gastrointestinal mucosa. We have therefore analyzed tissues of the GI tract from these vehicle- and LPS-treated rats (Fig. 5). In vehicle-treated animals, PGE synthase mRNA was detectable in the stomach, but low or undetectable signals were seen in colon, ileum, and jejunum. Upon LPS stimulation, significant up-regulation of PGE synthase was only detected in the colon. An extra sample from myeloproliferative tissue, the thymus, was included, and a slight induction of PGE synthase was detected. COX-2 mRNA levels were detected in the colon, ileum, jejunum, and stomach but were similar in both vehicle- and LPS-treated animal tissues, whereas up-regulation in the thymus was detected for COX-2 upon LPS challenge. IL-1beta was detectable in all LPS-treated tissues.

Induction of PGE Synthase in the Rat Adjuvant Arthritis Model-- The rat adjuvant arthritis model is used extensively as a pharmacological model of clinical arthritis and has a major prostaglandin component. Rats injected with adjuvant will begin demonstrating edema and hyperalgesia within several days of induction of disease, and this process is diminished in the presence of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors such as rofecoxib (6). We have utilized this model to detect PGE synthase, and 5 days after adjuvant treatment, a significant increase in the inducible PGE synthase was detected (Fig. 6). As seen in Fig. 6A, no PGE synthase is detected in the naïve (vehicle-treated) rat paw.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Induction of PGE synthase in rat adjuvant-induced arthritis. Paws from adjuvant-treated rats were isolated and fresh frozen for analysis by RT-PCR. RT-PCR was performed for PGE synthase, COX-2, and beta -actin (control) in both naïve and adjuvant-treated paws (A). The signal obtained is from RT-PCR samples separated on 1% agarose gels and stained with 0.5% ethidium bromide. The edema of the naïve versus the injected paw is presented for n = 4 rats at day 0 and day 5 and is expressed as paw volume (B).

Quantitative Analysis of PGE Synthase Expression-- We have also quantitated the RNA induction of PGE synthase and COX-2 in the tissues from LPS-treated rats and adjuvant-treated paws. Normalizing for beta -actin expression, the lung and the adjuvant-treated paw had the most significant induction of PGE synthase with 7- and 20-fold increases, respectively, as compared with tissues from vehicle-treated animals (Fig. 7A). COX-2 was also elevated 2.6-fold in lung and 6.5-fold in the adjuvant-treated paw (Fig. 7A). The remaining tissues that contained up-regulated PGE synthase (Fig. 5) RNA (testes, spleen, seminal vesicles, colon, and thymus) showed a 2- to 3-fold induction over non-LPS-exposed tissues, and the brain and heart contained a slightly higher increase of PGE synthase (5- to 6-fold). COX-2 mRNA was induced 2- to 5.8-fold in brain, heart, testes, spleen, and seminal vesicles, with the highest induction (as a ratio of beta -actin expression) observed in heart and brain. Because RNA induction may not always correlate with protein expression, we analyzed PGE synthase protein expression by immunoblot. Protein expression was examined in lung tissue from LPS-treated animals and adjuvant-treated paws (Fig. 7B) because these tissues contained the highest induction and levels of PGE synthase mRNA (Figs. 6 and 7A). The most significant protein induction detected was in the rat adjuvant-treated paw with a 16-fold increase of PGE synthase protein as compared with the naïve paw. This is in concordance with the 20-fold increase in mRNA (Fig. 7A) obtained from rat paws treated in a similar fashion. A 3.8-fold induction of PGE synthase protein was also detected in lung tissue (Fig. 7B) from LPS-treated animals, which is within 2-fold of the RNA induction (7-fold) obtained from similar tissues (Fig. 7A). This is the first reported evidence of PGE synthase protein in two major models of inflammation, LPS-induced pyresis and adjuvant-induced arthritis.



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Quantitative analysis of PGE synthase induction and protein expression in lung and in adjuvant-treated paw. Amplification of RNA in the described tissues was performed using RT-PCR. Various cycles of PCR were performed to quantitate (A) the signal during a linear part of the PCR amplification curve. The results for PGE synthase (n = 2) and COX-2 (n = 1) induction in lung are presented and demonstrate a 7- and 2.6-fold induction, respectively. The induction in the adjuvant-treated paw is 20-fold for PGE synthase (n = 2) and 6.5-fold for COX-2 (n = 2). These similar tissues were analyzed for protein expression as shown (B). Equal amounts of protein were electrophoresed on 10-20% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred electrophoretically, and analyzed by immunoblot using an affinity-purified PGE synthase polyclonal antibody (see "Materials and Methods"). The increase in PGE synthase protein expression is presented. PGE synthase standards are from a membrane preparation of transfected CHO cells.

Inhibition of PGE Synthase-- As described earlier, PGE synthase is a member of the MAPEG family, which also contains 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein (FLAP) and LTC4 synthase. We analyzed several inhibitors of FLAP such as MK-886 and the reaction product of LTC4 synthase, and we found that LTC4 and MK-886 inhibit rat PGE synthase with IC50 values of 1.2 and 3.2 µM, respectively (Fig. 8). In contrast, the cyclooxygenase inhibitors indomethacin and acetaminophen were inactive up to concentrations of 100 and 1000 µM, respectively, as inhibitors of rat PGE synthase.



View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Inhibition of PGE synthase by LTC4 and MK-886. Rat PGE synthase (0.01 mg/ml) in 100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, was incubated with either Me2SO or ethanol vehicle or various concentrations of LTC4 (A) or MK-886 (B) at room temperature for 15 min. The reaction was then initiated with 10 µM PGH2 and 0.2 µCi of [3H]PGH2 for 2 min. The reaction was terminated with the addition of 1 mg/ml stannous chloride in 35% acetonitrile and 0.1% acetic acid. The reaction products were subjected to reverse phase HPLC as described under "Materials and Methods." The results are an average of duplicates and are plotted as the percentage inhibition of PGE2 formation.



    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Induction of prostaglandin synthesis through the induction of the COX-2 enzyme is widely accepted as the mechanism responsible for prostanoid mediated pain, fever, and inflammation (2-6). The major prostanoids implicated in these pathophysiological conditions are PGI2 and PGE2. PGI2 has been implicated because the knockout of the prostacyclin receptor results in decreased paw swelling in the carageenan-induced acute inflammatory model in mice (20). A monoclonal antibody to PGE2 also demonstrates efficacy in a carageenan rat paw model of inflammation (7). The role of the prostaglandin E receptor is more difficult to define because there are four identified receptors for PGE2 (5). One approach to assess the role of PGE2 in various models would be to evaluate the regulation of the enzyme directly involved in its synthesis, PGE synthase. We have now cloned the rat enzyme and examined its induction along with COX-2 in the rat upon LPS challenge. Using a new assay for PGE synthase activity in which the remaining PGH2 at the end of the reaction is converted to PGF2alpha with stannous chloride, rat PGE synthase was found to be active when expressed in CHO cells. The rat PGE synthase is 80% identical to the human enzyme.

The coinduction of PGE synthase with COX-2 and IL-1beta demonstrates that in vivo this enzyme is up-regulated under proinflammatory conditions such as LPS-induced pyresis and adjuvant-induced arthritis. Interestingly, the highest induction of rat PGE synthase was seen in the lung and in the adjuvant-treated paw. Aerosilized PGE2 has been demonstrated to enhance respiratory function when administered before antigen challenge (21), and this increased PGE synthase may be a method of maintaining significant oxygenation in the lungs for tissues undergoing damage after LPS provocation. The significant induction of PGE synthase in adjuvant-induced arthritis is consistent with the important role that prostaglandins play in this inflammatory model (22, 23). Most striking is the induction of PGE synthase protein in this model, which correlates well with the mRNA induction. The protein detection in the paw and lung tissues and the similarity of induction as compared with RNA levels suggest concordance of PGE synthase mRNA expression with protein expression in these tissues. During preparation of the manuscript for this article, another study confirming the LPS-stimulated induction of PGE synthase has been published (24). This recent study has also demonstrated preferential coupling of inducible PGE synthase with COX-2 as opposed to COX-1. This further strengthens the role of PGE synthase as a therapeutic target for inflammation. The kidney is also an important target tissue for prostaglandins, and they play an important role in regulating renal hemodynamics. We have not detected either COX-2 or PGE synthase in the kidney, but this is not unexpected because COX-2 is localized mainly to one specific region, the macula densa (25, 26). In situ hybridization would be required for more precise determinations of mRNA induction of COX-2 and PGE synthase in the kidney and other tissues that express these enzymes in localized regions.

It is well established that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs cause GI lesions, and GI ulceration is a major clinical side effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs that nonselectively inhibit COX-1 and COX-2 (27-29). These GI side effects have been attributed to prostanoids derived from COX-1, which cause alterations in mucosal blood flow, and changes in mucous secretion and bicarbonate and tumor necrosis factor alpha  production. The importance of prostaglandins as cytoprotectants in the GI tract has been described previously (30). PGE synthase is constitutively expressed in the stomach, and its role in cytoprotection and its relationship to COX-1 and COX-2 in GI tissues remain to be investigated. Also, because COX-2 has been implicated to be a mediator of colonic tumors (31), the induction of PGE synthase in this tissue and its link to COX-2 provide impetus to examine its expression in colon tumors as compared with normal colonic epithelium (32). The constitutive mRNA expression of COX-2 in several GI tissues is in contrast to the undetectable level of COX-2 protein (33) in these tissues, and this may result from induction during manipulation of tissues, or it may suggest tight translational control of protein expression.

PGE synthase is a member of the MAPEG family, which includes FLAP and LTC4 synthase. Comparison of the hydropathy plots of these three proteins demonstrates an identical putative membrane topography for all three of these family members, although the sequence identity of PGE synthase with FLAP and LTC4 synthase is less than 20% at the amino acid level. MK-886, which is a potent inhibitor of leukotriene biosynthesis (IC50 = 100 nM (34)), was also found to inhibit PGE synthase with a moderate potency (IC50 = 3.2 µM). MK-886 is also a weak inhibitor of LTC4 synthase with an IC50 of 11 µM (35). Interestingly as depicted in Fig. 9, the region of FLAP that is essential for binding compounds such as MK-886 (36, 37) is highly conserved in both LTC4 synthase and PGE synthase. In fact, the negative charge of the aspartate or a glutamate at position 62 of FLAP is essential for binding MK-886 analogues. MK-886 appears to inhibit leukotriene biosynthesis by binding to an arachidonate binding site on FLAP (38). The presence of a consensus amino acid sequence and sensitivity to indole inhibitors of the MK-886 series for FLAP, LTC4 synthase, and PGE synthase suggest that this region might also be involved in the binding of eicosanoids for each of these proteins. The motif ERXXXAXXNXXD/E could represent a consensus sequence for interaction with arachidonic acid and/or several of its oxygenation products.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Alignment of a putative substrate and inhibitor binding site of FLAP, LTC4 synthase, and PGE synthase. The amino acid region 50-62 for human FLAP is an essential region for binding leukotriene inhibitors such as MK-886. The identity in this region is compared with LTC4 synthase and PGE synthase. Gray shading represents identical residues, and black shading represents conserved residues.

The EP3 knockout has elegantly demonstrated that this receptor, along with PGE2, is the major mechanism of LPS- and IL-1beta -induced pyresis (39). The induction of PGE synthase in the brain during LPS-induced pyresis and in the paw in adjuvant-induced arthritis suggests that this enzyme may have an important function in the initiation of pyresis, pain, and inflammation. The development of selective inhibitors of PGE synthase and a mouse deletion of this gene will provide substantial input in the role of PGE2 as compared with other prostanoids in the initiation of inflammatory responses.


    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Merck Frosst Centre for Therapeutic Research, P. O. Box 1005, Pointe-Claire/Dorval, Quebec H9R 4P8, Canada. Tel.: 514-428-3167; Fax: 514-428-4930; E-mail: joseph_mancini@merck.com.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, November 6, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M006865200


    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: PG, prostaglandin; COX, cyclooxygenase; FLAP, 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein; GI, gastrointestinal; LT, leukotriene; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography; IL, interleukin; MGST, microsomal glutathione transferase; PBST, Dulbecco's phoshate-buffered saline, 0.05% Tween 20; RT, reverse transcription; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES


1. Jakobsson, P. J., Thoren, S., Morgenstern, R., and Samuelsson, B. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 7220-7225[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Smith, W. L., and Marnett, L. J. (1991) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1083, 1-17[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Vane, J. R., and Botting, R. M. (1995) Inflamm. Res. 44, 1-10[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Herschman, H. R. (1996) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1299, 125-140[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Narumiya, S., Sugimoto, Y., and Ushikubi, F. (1999) Physiol. Rev. 79, 1193-1226[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Chan, C. C., Boyce, S., Brideau, C., Charleson, S., Cromlish, W., Ethier, D., Evans, J., Ford-Hutchinson, A. W., Forrest, M. J., Gauthier, J. Y., Gordon, R., Gresser, M., Guay, J., Kargman, S., Kennedy, B., Leblanc, Y., Leger, S., Mancini, J., O'Neill, G. P., Ouellet, M., Patrick, D., Percival, M. D., Perrier, H., Prasit, P., Rodger, I., Tagari, P., Therien, M., Vickers, P., Visco, D., Wang, Z., Webb, J., Wong, E., Xu, L.-J., Young, R. N., Zamboni, R., and Riendeau, D. (1999) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 290, 551-560[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Portanova, J. P., Zhang, Y., Anderson, G. D., Hauser, S. D., Masferrer, J. L., Seibert, K., Gregory, S. A., and Isakson, P. C. (1996) J. Exp. Med. 184, 883-891[Abstract]
8. Jakobsson, P. J., Morgenstern, R., Mancini, J., Ford-Hutchinson, A., and Persson, B. (1999) Protein Sci. 8, 689-692[Abstract]
9. Samuelsson, B. (1983) Science 220, 568-575[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Leff, J. A., Busse, W. W., Pearlman, D., Bronsky, E. A., Kemp, J., Hendeles, L., Dockhorn, R., Kundu, S., Zhang, J., Seidenberg, B. C., and Reiss, T. F. (1998) N. Engl. J. Med. 339, 147-152[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Welsch, D. J., Creely, D. P., Hauser, S. D., Mathis, K. J., Krivi, G. G., and Isakson, P. C. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 9745-9749[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Mancini, J. A., Abramovitz, M., Cox, M. E., Wong, E., Charleson, S., Perrier, H., Wang, Z., Prasit, P., and Vickers, P. J. (1993) FEBS Lett. 318, 277-281[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Jakobsson, P. J., Mancini, J. A., and Ford-Hutchinson, A. W. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 22203-22210[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Jakobsson, P. J., Mancini, J. A., Riendeau, D., and Ford-Hutchinson, A. W. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 22934-22939[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Morgenstern, R., Guthenberg, C., and Depierre, J. W. (1982) Eur. J. Biochem. 128, 243-248[Abstract]
16. Satoh, K., Nagano, Y., Shimomura, C., Suzuki, N., Saeki, Y., and Yokota, H. (2000) Neurosci. Lett. 283, 221-223[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Fletcher, D. S., Widmer, W. R., Luell, S., Christen, A., Orevillo, C., Shah, S., and Visco, D. (1998) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 284, 714-721[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Cao, C., Matsumura, K., Yamagata, K., and Watanabe, Y. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 272, R1712-R1725[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Yamagata, K., Andreasson, K. I., Kaufmann, W. E., Barnes, C. A., and Worley, P. F. (1993) Neuron 11, 371-386[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Murata, T., Ushikubi, F., Matsuoka, T., Hirata, M., Yamasaki, A., Sugimoto, Y., Ichikawa, A., Aze, Y., Tanaka, T., Yoshida, N., Ueno, A., Oh-ishi, S., and Narumiya, S. (1997) Nature 388, 678-682[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Pavord, I. D., Wong, C. S., Williams, J., and Tattersfield, A. E. (1993) Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 148, 87-90[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Philippe, L., Gegout-Pottie, P., Guingamp, C., Bordji, K., Terlain, B., Netter, P., and Gillet, P. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 273, R1550-R1556[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Mukherjee, A., Hale, V. G., Borga, O., and Stein, R. (1996) Inflamm. Res. 45, 531-540[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Murakami, M., Naraba, H., Tanioka, T., Semmyo, N., Nakatani, Y., Kojima, F., Ikeda, T., Fueki, M., Ueno, A., Oh-Ishi, S., and Kudo, I. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 32783-32792[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Harris, R. C., McKanna, J. A., Akai, Y., Jacobson, H. R., Dubois, R. N., and Breyer, M. D. (1994) J. Clin. Invest. 94, 2504-2510[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Nantel, F., Meadows, E., Denis, D., Connolly, B., Metters, K. M., and Giaid, A. (1999) FEBS Lett. 457, 475-477[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Allison, M. C., Howatson, A. G., Torrance, C. J., Lee, F. D., and Russell, R. I. (1992) N. Engl. J. Med. 327, 749-754[Abstract]
28. Langman, M. J., Weil, J., Wainwright, P., Lawson, D. H., Rawlins, M. D., Logan, R. F., Murphy, M., Vessey, M. P., and Colin-Jones, D. G. (1994) Lancet 343, 1075-1078[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Traversa, G., Walker, A. M., Ippolito, F. M., Caffari, B., Capurso, L., Dezi, A., Koch, M., Maggini, M., Alegiani, S. S., and Raschetti, R. (1995) Epidemiology 6, 49-54[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Goldstein, J. L., Larson, L. R., and Yamashita, B. D. (1998) Am. J. Manag. Care 4, 687-697[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Oshima, M., Dinchuk, J. E., Kargman, S. L., Oshima, H., Hancock, B., Kwong, E., Trzaskos, J. M., Evans, J. F., and Taketo, M. M. (1996) Cell 87, 803-809[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Kargman, S. L., O'Neill, G. P., Vickers, P. J., Evans, J. F., Mancini, J. A., and Jothy, S. (1995) Cancer Res. 55, 2556-2559[Abstract]
33. Kargman, S., Charleson, S., Cartwright, M., Frank, J., Riendeau, D., Mancini, J., Evans, J., and O'Neill, G. (1996) Gastroenterology 111, 445-454[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Rouzer, C. A., Ford-Hutchinson, A. W., Morton, H. E., and Gillard, J. W. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 1436-1442[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Gupta, N., Nicholson, D. W., and Ford-Hutchinson, A. W. (1997) Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 75, 1212-1219[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Vickers, P. J., Adam, M., Charleson, S., Coppolino, M. G., Evans, J. F., and Mancini, J. A. (1992) Mol. Pharmacol. 42, 94-102[Abstract]
37. Mancini, J. A., Coppolino, M. G., Klassen, J. H., Charleson, S., and Vickers, P. J. (1994) Life Sci. 54, PL137-PL142[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Mancini, J. A., Waterman, H., and Riendeau, D. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 32842-32847[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Ushikubi, F., Segi, E., Sugimoto, Y., Murata, T., Matsuoka, T., Kobayashi, T., Hizaki, H., Tuboi, K., Katsuyama, M., Ichikawa, A., Tanaka, T., Yoshida, N., and Narumiya, S. (1998) Nature 395, 281-284[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.