p300 Does Not Require Its Acetylase Activity to Stimulate p73 Function*

Xiaoya Zeng, Hunjoo Lee, Qinghong ZhangDagger , and Hua Lu§

From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and the Dagger  Vollum Institute, Oregon Health Science University, Portland, Oregon 97201

Received for publication, October 12, 2000, and in revised form, October 31, 2000



    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We previously reported that p73, like p53, utilizes p300 or cAMP-response element-binding protein-binding protein as its coactivator. Here, we extended this work by further examining whether the intrinsic acetylase activity of p300 is necessary for stimulating p73 function. Although p300 acetylated the C-terminal fragment of p73 (amino acids 311-636) in vitro, it was unable to efficiently acetylate the full-length p73. Consistently, p300 did not acetylate p73 in vivo when both the proteins were overexpressed in cells. Also, an acetylase-defective mutant p300 named p300AT2 was able to elevate p73-dependent transcription in cells. p300 associated with p73 when forming DNA-protein complexes and stabilized p73 proteins. These results demonstrate that p300 does not need its acetylase activity to be a coactivator of p73.



    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

p300 and CBP1 have been shown to mediate transcription by many different transcriptional activators (1), including the tumor suppressor p53 protein (2-4), and to be involved in cell growth control and neoplasia (see Ref. 5 and references therein). p300 and CBP are two individual proteins encoded by two different genes (6-8), but they share a significant homology in their functional domains with similar biochemical functions. However, their roles in development and neoplasia are not redundant (5, 9), indicating that each of them is crucial for cell growth control. Interestingly, both of these coactivators possess intrinsic acetylase activity, which plays a critical role in regulating the functions of some p300/CBP interacting transcriptional activators (10), such as p53 (11, 12). By acetylating p53, p300/CBP stimulates its ability to bind to DNA in a sequence-specific fashion in vitro (11) and enhances its transcription in vivo (2-4), indicating that this group of coactivators participate in the p53 responsive pathway. Indeed, DNA damage signals stimulate p53 acetylation by p300 (12), which can be inhibited by the cellular p53 repressor MDM2 (13). Hence, participating in the p53 pathway represents one role of p300/CBP in preventing neoplasia.

p300 has also been shown to regulate the function of the human p53 homolog p73 (14, 15), which has several alternate splice forms (16). p73 shares the sequence homology and some biochemical activity with p53 (14-17). Although p73 was shown to induce the same subset of genes as p53 does with a minor difference (14, 17, 18), they appear to play different physiological roles (19). p73-deficient mice displayed neurological, pheromonal, and inflammatory defects without spontaneous tumors (19), whereas p53 knockout mice developed normally with an early onset of tumorigenesis (20). However, because of the high mortality of the p73 null mice (19), it is difficult to assess the role of p73 in tumorigenesis. Other studies showed that the oncogenic p53 mutants inhibit p73 function (21, 22), and the alternate splice form of p73 that lacks the N-terminal transactivation domain represses the function of both p53 and p73 (23, 24), suggesting that p73 may also be involved in tumorigenesis. However, this function of p73 may be suppressed by its N-terminal truncated alternates (23, 24), which were found to be expressed at the high level in some primary tumors (25-28).

Distinct roles of p73 and p53 in development and tumorigenesis suggest that these proteins may be differentially regulated through separate mechanisms. Indeed, upon gamma  irradiation, p73 is activated through the c-Abl tyrosine kinase (29-31), whereas p53 is activated through the Ataxia telangiectasia-mutated Chk2 pathway (32-36). Also, MDM2 mediates degradation of p53, but not p73, although it inhibits the functions of both the proteins (14, 37-42). In addition, unlike p53, p73 contains a unique C-terminal SAM (sterile alpha motif)-like domain that may be involved in protein-protein interaction (43, 44). Distinct mechanisms for the regulation of the p53 family members may, at least partially, account for their different physiological roles in development, homeostasis, or tumorigenesis. Thus, unraveling their regulatory mechanisms is crucial for better understanding of their biological roles.

In an attempt to elucidate the mechanisms of p73 regulation, we previously reported that p73, like p53, utilizes p300 or CBP as its coactivator. Here, we extended this work by further examining whether the intrinsic acetylase activity of p300 is necessary for stimulating p73 function. Surprisingly, p300 was unable to acetylate the full-length p73alpha in vitro. Also, p300 did not acetylate p73alpha in vivo when both of the proteins were overexpressed in cells. Moreover, an acetylase-defective mutant p300 named p300AT2, like wild type p300, was able to elevate p73alpha -dependent transcription in cells. These results demonstrate that p300 does not need its acetylase activity to stimulate p73-dependent transcription.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell Culture-- Human lung small cell carcinoma H1299 cells were cultured as described previously (45).

Antibodies and Reagents-- The anti-acetylated lysine antibody and the polyclonal anti-p63 antibody were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. Monoclonal anti-p53 antibody Pab421 was described previously (14). Polyclonal anti-p73 antibodies were raised specifically against the C terminus (aa 401-636) of p73alpha and affinity-purified as described (46). This anti-p73 antibody recognizes both p73alpha and p73beta . Baculovirus harboring human p300 mutant AT2 and pBlueScript-p300AT2 were generously provided by W. Lee Kraus (Cornell University, Ithaca, NY) and James T. Kadonaga (University of California, San Diego, CA). The p300AT2 insert with a C-terminal polyhistidine tag was cloned into the HindIII and NotI sites of pcDNA3 vector (Invitrogen).

Purification of Recombinant p300, p300AT2, p53, p73alpha , and the p73alpha C Terminus (aa 311-636)-- p300AT2 and p300 were purified from baculovirus-infected SF9 insect cells using immunoaffinity columns as described. His-p53, His-p73alpha , and the p73alpha C terminus (aa 311-636) tagged with histidines were purified from bacteria using nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid column as described (14, 15).

Acetylation Assay-- Acetylation assays were carried out according to the published method (11, 13). 20 µl of reaction mixture contained 50 mM Tris-Hcl (pH 8.0), 10% glycerol (v/v), 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 10 mM sodium butyrate, [1-14C]acetyl-CoA, or 500 nM or different concentrations of acetyl-CoA (Sigma), different amounts of p53, p73, the p73 C-terminal fragment (aa 311-636), histones, p300, or p300AT2 (see figure legends for the amounts of the proteins used in each reaction). The mixture was incubated at 30 °C for 60 min and analyzed by SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Acetylated p53 was detected either by autoradiography or Western blot analysis using the polyclonal anti-acetylated lysine antibody (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.). Monoclonal anti-p53 antibody 421, polyclonal anti-p73 antibody, and polyclonal anti-p300 antibody were used to detect corresponding protein levels.

EMSA-- This assay was conducted as described. Proteins, as indicated in the figure legends, were pre-incubated with antibodies against p300 or p73 or p63 in the presence or absence of acetyl-CoA, at 30 °C for 30 min, as described above, prior to being mixed with a DNA binding mixture containing 10 mM Hepes buffer (pH 7.5), 4 mM MgCl2, 60 mM NaCl, 0.1 µg poly(dI-dC), 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 5'/3' 32P end-labeled DNA fragments harboring two copies of the p53RE sequence derived from the MDM2 promoter (5,000 cpm; 1.0 ng of DNA per assay). The reaction was incubated at room temperature for 30 min and directly loaded onto a 4% nondenatured gel.

Western Blot Analysis-- Transfected cells were harvested for preparation of nuclear extracts. Nuclear extracts containing 150 µg of proteins were directly loaded onto an SDS gel, and proteins were detected by ECL reagents (Bio-Rad) after Western blotting using antibodies as indicated in the figure legends.

Transient Transfection and Luciferase Assay-- H1299 cells (60% confluence in a 12-well plate) were transfected with a pCMV-beta -galactoside reporter plasmid (0.2 µg) and a luciferase reporter plasmid (0.1 µg) driven by two copies of the p53RE motif derived from the MDM2 promoter (14), together with a combination of different plasmids (total plasmid DNA = 1 µg/well) as indicated in Fig. 4, using LipofectAMINE (Promega, Madison, WI). 48 h post-transfection, cells were harvested for luciferase assays as described previously (15). Luciferase activity was normalized by a factor of beta -galactosidase activity tested in the same assay.

cDNA Probe Labeling-- p53 and p73 cDNA probes, as indicated in Fig. 2B, were prepared using random primer labeling as described (47).

Northern Blot Analysis-- Northern blot analysis was carried out as described (47). Total RNA from transfected cells, as indicated in Fig. 2B, was isolated using the Trizol reagent (Life Technologies, Inc.). 15 µg of RNA were loaded onto a 1.5% agarose gel and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was exposed to UV light in a UV cross-linker (Fisher Biotech) and incubated with 32P-labeled cDNA probes encoding mouse p53 or p73 at 42 °C overnight. After washing with 4× SSC once and 1× SSC twice, the blot was exposed to x-ray film.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

p300 Does Not Acetylate the Full Length of p73alpha in Vitro-- The acetyltransferase activity of p300 has been shown to be important in mediating the activity of the transcriptional activator p53 (11-13). To check whether this is also true for the p53 homolog p73alpha (16), we conducted in vitro acetylase assays using recombinant p300 purified from baculovirus and his-p73alpha or his-C terminus of p73alpha (aa 311-636) purified from bacteria, as well as 14C-acetyl-CoA as substrates. Surprisingly, as shown in Fig. 1A, p300 was unable to acetylate the intact p73alpha protein (lanes 3 and 4). This was not because of the inactivity of the purified p300 protein, as it was active in acetylating p53 (lane 1), as well as the C-terminal domain of p73 (lanes 5 and 6). As shown in the representative result (Fig. 1B), even though up to 5 µM of acetyl-CoA was used, p300 (200 ng) was still not able to acetylate p73alpha (lanes 1-7). Also, 1 µg of p300 did not show efficient acetylase activity on p73alpha (data not shown). In contrast, p300 needed only 100 nM of acetyl-CoA to sufficiently acetylate p53 (lane 11) and ~1 µM acetyl-CoA to reach a plateau level (lanes 8-14). These results indicate that p300 does not utilize the full-length p73alpha as a substrate in vitro.



View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   p300 does not acetylate p73alpha in vitro. A, p300 acetylated the C-terminal region aa 311-636 but not the full length of p73alpha in vitro. 150 ng of p53, 150 or 300 ng of p73alpha or of the p73alpha C-terminal region aa 311-636 (C-p73alpha ), and 200 ng of p300 were used in this acetylation assay, as indicate on top. 14C-Labeled acetyl-CoA was used here. Acetylated proteins were detected by autoradiography. Molecular mass markers are indicated at left, and * denotes nonspecific signals (the same for Figs. 2-4). B, p300 acetylates p53, but not p73alpha , in vitro in an acetyl-CoA concentration-dependent fashion. 250 ng of p53 or p73alpha and 200 ng of p300 together with different concentrations of nonlabeled acetyl-CoA, as indicated on top, were used in this assay. Acetylated proteins (upper panel) were detected by Western blot (WB) using antibodies specific for acetylated lysines (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.). The p53 or p73alpha protein (lower panel) was detected by WB using anti-p53 or anti-p73 antibodies.

p300 Does Not Acetylate p73alpha in Vivo-- Next, we tested whether p300 acetylates p73alpha in vivo. To this end, human p53 null lung small cell carcinoma H1299 cells were transiently transfected with plasmids encoding wild type, mutant p300 (p300AT2) lacking acetylase activity (48), p53, or p73alpha , as indicated in Fig. 2A. Acetylation of p53 was detected by Western blot using polyclonal antibodies specifically against acetylated lysines. As expected, p300 but not the p300AT2 mutant acetylated p53 in cells (lanes 6 and 7 of the bottom panel). By striking contrast, p73alpha acetylation was not detectable in the presence of wild type p300 (lane 2), despite the fact that the p73alpha protein was well expressed (top panel), and the transfected cells were exposed to UV or gamma  irradiation (data not shown). This was not because of the inability of the anti-acetylated lysine antibody to recognize the acetylated p73alpha , as this same antibody was able to immunoreact with the p73 C-terminal region that was acetylated by p300 in vitro (Ref. 13 and data not shown). These results clearly show that p300 does not acetylate p73alpha in cells.



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   p300 does not acetylate p73alpha in vivo. A, p300 acetylated p53 but not p73alpha in cells. H1299 cells (105 cells/60-mm dish) were transfected with p73alpha (500 ng) or p53 (500 ng) alone or together wild type (WT) or mutant (AT2) p300 (2.5 µg), as indicated on top. Whole cell extracts (500 µg) of the transfected cells were directly loaded onto an 8% SDS gel. As indicated on left, p73alpha and p53 were detected by WB using the monoclonal antibodies against p73 and p53 (top panel). The acetylated proteins were detected by WB using polyclonal antibodies against acetylated lysines (bottom panel). Lane 5 denotes the molecular mass markers, and the acetylated bovine serum albumen was detected by the anti-acetylated lysine antibody (bottom panel). B, overexpression of p300 did not influence the mRNA synthesis of either p73alpha or p53 in cells. Northern blot analysis (NB) of the mRNA levels of p73alpha and p53 after the same transient transfection as described in panel A is shown. Plasmids used are indicated on top of both panels. 13 µg of total RNAs isolated from the transfected cells were loaded onto a 1% agarose gel. Ethidium bromide staining for total RNA loading was shown on the lower panel. The mRNA for either p73alpha or p73 was detected by NB using the 32P-labeled p73alpha or p53 probes (upper panel).

Consistent with the published studies by others and us (13, 49), the p53 level increased when p300 was cointroduced into the cells (compare lane 7 with lane 8 of the top panel). The acetylase activity is partially responsible for this increase, as the p53 level was elevated to a lesser degree when the p300 mutant, which did not acetylate p53, was cotransfected with p53 (lane 6). This result was reproduced in separate experiments (data not shown). Similarly, the p73alpha level also increased when cotransfected with p300 (lane 2). However, this was not dependent upon the acetylase activity of p300, as p300 did not acetylate p73alpha (compare lane 2 with lane 3 of the bottom panel), and overexpression of the acetylase-dead mutant p300AT2 also increased the level of p73 (lane 1). Because the mRNA synthesis of the exogenous p53 or p73alpha was not affected by the exogenous p300 (Fig. 2B), the increase of either the p53 or p73alpha protein was not due to transcriptional activation of these exogenous genes by p300. These results, which were reproducible, suggest that although p300 did not acetylate p73alpha , it may modulate the stability of this transcriptional activator.

p300 Joins and Stabilizes the p73-DNA Complex in Vitro-- Because p300 enhances the ability of p53 to bind the specific p53RE motif by acetylating this protein (11, 13), we tested whether p300 affects the sequence-specific DNA binding ability of p73alpha without acetylating this protein. First, we established a gel mobility shift assay, using the recombinant p73alpha protein purified from bacteria and the radiolabeled DNA oligomer probes containing the p53RE sequence derived from the p21 promoter (Fig. 3A). The p73alpha -DNA complex migrated slower than the p53-DNA complex and was specifically inhibited by the nonlabeled p53RE-containing oligomers but not dIdC. Also, this DNA-protein complex was supershifted by antibodies specifically against p73 but not p63 (Fig. 3B).



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   p300 binds to the p53RE-bound p73alpha but does not enhance the p73alpha -DNA complex formation in vitro. A, the formation of p73alpha -DNA complexes was inhibited by the p53RE-containing oligomers. 100 ng of p53 or p73alpha , 100 () or 200 ng () of poly (dI-dC) or the p53RE-containing oligomers derived from the p21 promoter (p21) were used in this EMSA experiment, as indicated on top. B, the p73alpha -DNA complexes were supershifted by the monoclonal anti-p73 antibody. The same assay was conducted as above, except 100 () or 200 ng () of the anti-p63 or anti-p73 antibody were used here, as indicated on top. C, p300 bound to the p73alpha -DNA complexes. The same EMSA experiment was carried out as above, except 100 (), 200 (), or 300 ng () of p300 purified from the baculovirus system, either alone or with the anti-p300 antibody (200 ng), were pre-incubated with the p73alpha protein before being added into the reaction, as indicated on top. In addition, 5 µM of nonlabeled acetyl-CoA were added into lanes 2, 4, and 6-11. Free probes are shown at the bottom of each panel.

As expected (11, 13), p300 (100 ng) markedly stimulated p53-DNA complex formation in the presence of acetyl-CoA (lanes 3 and 4 of Fig. 3C). However, this acetylase only caused a marginal increase of the p73alpha -DNA complex, even when 2-fold more p300 (200 ng) was used (lanes 5-11). This slight effect was not reproduced (data not shown). Rather, p300 participated in the p73-DNA complex, because addition of increasing amounts of p300 supershifted this complex (lanes 6-7), and this complex was further supershifted by the anti-p300 antibody (lanes 9-11). By participating in the p73-DNA complex, p300 may stabilize this complex, because the amount of the complex increased apparently when 300 ng of p300 was added into the reaction (lanes 8 and 11). This increase was also seen in the absence of acetyl-CoA (data not shown). These results suggest that p300 joins and stabilizes the p73-DNA complex through direct protein interaction but not through its acetylase activity.

Stimulation of p73alpha -dependent Transcription by the Acetylase-defective Mutant p300-- To further test whether the acetylase-defective p300AT2 mutant is able to influence p73alpha function in cells, H1299 cells were transfected with the p73alpha expression plasmid alone or together with plasmids encoding wild type p300 and its two mutants, p300AT2 and the deletion lacking the central portion from aa 242 to aa 1740 (Delta 242-1740), in the presence of the p53RE-driven luciferase reporter plasmid. Luciferase activity was measured as an indication of p73alpha -dependent transcription (Fig. 4C). We previously showed that Delta 242-1740 did not bind to p73 and had no effect on its transcription activity (15). Consistently, this mutant did not increase the level of p73alpha (two upper panels of Fig. 4B), and thus, was used here as a negative control. As expected, this mutant neither acetylated p53 nor increased its protein level (two lower panels of Fig. 4B). In agreement with our previous study (15), p300 markedly stimulated p73alpha -dependent transcription, whereas the deletion mutant had no effect on this transcription activity (Fig. 4C). The same was true for p53 (data not shown; see Ref. 11). However, the acetylase-defective p300AT2 mutant, like wild type p300, enhanced p73alpha -mediated transcription markedly. This enhancement would not be due to the general effect on nucleosome modeling or modification, because this mutant was inactive in acetylating histones (Fig. 4A) and did not affect the mRNA level of p73alpha (Fig. 2B). These results indicate that p300 can stimulate p73alpha -mediated transcription without involving its intrinsic acetylase activity.



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Both of the wild type and mutant p300 proteins stimulate p73alpha -dependent transcription in cells. A, the p300 mutant (p300AT2) was inactive in acetylating p53 and histones in vitro. An in vitro acetylation assay was performed as described in Fig. 1B. 100 ng of p53 or 400 ng of histones (Sigma) together with 1 µM acetyl-CoA were used in this assay. 100 or 200 ng of wild type p300 or p300 mutant (AT2) were used here, as indicated on top. Acetylated proteins were detected by WB using anti-acetylated lysine antibodies. p300 was detected using the polyclonal anti-p300 antibody (top panel). B, the Delta 242-1740 mutant of p300 did not stimulate the levels of p73alpha and p53. The same transfection-Western blot assay as that described for Fig. 2A was carried out, except that pcDNA3-Delta 242-1740, instead of p300AT2 (2.5 µg), was used together with either p73alpha or p53 as indicated on top. Antibodies used for WB are shown at left. The level of p73 or its acetylation is shown on two top panels from one experiment (Exp 1), whereas that of p53 is shown on two bottom panels from a separate experiment (Exp 2). C, transient transfection-luciferase assays. H1299 cells (60% confluence in 35-mm dishes) were transfected with 100 ng of p73alpha alone or with 600 ng of p300, p300AT2 or the p300 deletion mutant without the region of aa 242-1720, 200 ng of beta -galactosidase reporter (as an internal control), and 100 ng of the luciferase reporter plasmid driven by the p53RE motif derived from the p21 promoter. Each column presents the mean activity from three dishes, and the bars denote the deviation errors. The pcDNA3 parental plasmid was used as a control (c). Luciferase activity was normalized with beta -galactosidase activity.

We previously showed that p73 interacts with p300 through the N terminus of p73 and the CH1 domain of p300 (15), and this interaction mediates p73-dependent transcription and apoptosis (15). The study presented here provides several lines of evidence showing that p300 positively affects p73-mediated transcription activation independently of its intrinsic acetylase activity. First of all, p73alpha was a considerably poor substrate for the acetylase activity of p300 in vitro, in contrast with p53, which is acetylated by p300 in response to DNA damage (12, 13). Consistent with this in vitro result, p300 did not acetylate p73alpha when both of the proteins were overexpressed in cells. p73beta was also not acetylated by p300.2 Moreover, the acetylase-defective mutant p300AT2 was able to stimulate p73-dependent transcription in transient transfected cells. Thus, these results demonstrate that p300 does not need its acetylase activity to activate p73 function. Although our study does not exclude the possibility that p73alpha may be regulated through acetylation by other acetylases such as CBP or p300/CBP-associated factor (12, 50, 51), this appears less likely, because we were not able to detect acetylated p73 molecules by Western blot using antibodies against the acetylated lysine, even when this protein was overexpressed, or the transfected cells were irradiated with UV or gamma  ray (Fig. 2 and data not shown).

How does p300 modulate p73 function without acetylating this protein? One possibility would be that p300 may regulate p73 stability and thus enhance its activity. The p73alpha protein level increased when coexpressed with p300 (Fig. 2 and Fig. 4B). However, the mRNA level of p73alpha was not affected by p300 (Fig. 2B), suggesting that p73alpha is regulated at the protein level and probably stabilized by p300. Alternatively, p300 may serve as a bridging protein that links p73 with the RNA polymerase II transcriptional machinery. Supporting this is that p300 interacts with p73 when this transcriptional activator binds to its responsive DNA element sequence (Fig. 3C). Although these two possibilities may coexist, further investigation of these questions is necessary to elucidate the detailed molecular and biochemical mechanism of p73 regulation by p300.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank David Keller for active discussion, Eric Kobet for preparing reagents for this study, and W. Lee Kraus, James T. Kadonaga, and Richard Goodman for generously providing reagents used in this study.


    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health and American Cancer Society grants (to H. L.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oregon Health Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR 97201. Tel.: 503-494-7414; Fax: 503-494-8393; E-mail: LUH@OHSU.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, November 13, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.C000722200

2 Unpublished observation.


    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: CBP, cAMP-response element-binding protein-binding protein; EMSA, electrophoresis mobility shift assay; NB, Northern blot; RE, responsive element; WB, Western blot; aa, amino acid; MDM, murine double minute.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES


1. Shikama, N., Lyon, L., and La Thangue, N. B. (1997) Trends Cell Biol. 7, 230-236[CrossRef]
2. Avantaggiati, M. L., Ogryzko, V., Gardner, K., Giordano, A., Levine, A. S., and Kelly, K. (1997) Cell 89, 1175-1184[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Gu, W., Shi, X. L., and Roeder, R. G. (1997) Nature 387, 819-823[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Lill, N. L., Grossman, S. R., Ginsberg, D., DeCaprio, J., and Livingston, D. M. (1997) Nature 387, 823-827[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Goodman, R. H., and Smolik, S. (2000) Genes Dev. 14, 1553-1577[Free Full Text]
6. Chrivia, J. C., Kwok, R. P., Lamb, N., Hagiwara, M., Montminy, M. R., and Goodman, R. H. (1993) Nature 365, 855-859[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Stein, R. W., Corrigan, M., Yaciuk, P., Whelan, J., and Moran, E. (1990) J. Virol. 64, 4421-4427[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Eckner, R., Ewen, M. E., Newsome, D., Gerdes, M., DeCaprio, J. A., Lawrence, J. B., and Livingston, D. M. (1994) Genes Dev. 8, 869-884[Abstract]
9. Yao, T. P., Oh, S. P., Fuchs, M., Zhou, N. D., Ch'ng, L. E., Newsome, D., Bronson, R. T., Li, E., Livingston, D. M., and Eckner, R. (1998) Cell 93, 361-372[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Struhl, K. (1998) Genes Dev. 12, 599-606[Free Full Text]
11. Gu, W., and Roeder, R. G. (1997) Cell 90, 595-606[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Sakaguchi, K., Herrera, J. E., Saito, S., Miki, T., Bustin, M., Vassilev, A., Anderson, C. W., and Appella, E. (1998) Genes Dev. 12, 2831-2841[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Kobet, E., Zeng, X., Zhu, Y., Keller, D., and Lu, H. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 12547-12552[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Zeng, X., Chen, L., Jost, C. A., Maya, R., Keller, D., Wang, X., Kaelin, W. G., Jr., Oren, M., Chen, J., and Lu, H. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 3257-3266[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Zeng, X., Li, X., Miller, A., Yuan, Z., Yuan, W., Kwok, R. P., Goodman, R., and Lu, H. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 1299-1310[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Kaghad, M., Bonnet, H., Yang, A., Creancier, L., Biscan, J. C., Valent, A., Minty, A., Chalon, P., Lelias, J. M., Dumont, X., Ferrara, P., McKeon, F., and Caput, D. (1997) Cell 90, 809-819[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Jost, C. A., Marin, M. C., and Kaelin, W. G., Jr. (1997) Nature 389, 191-194[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Zhu, J., Jiang, J., Zhou, W., and Chen, X. (1998) Cancer Res. 58, 5061-5065[Abstract]
19. Yang, A., Walker, N., Bronson, R., Kaghad, M., Oosterwegel, M., Bonnin, J., Vagner, C., Bonnet, H., Dikkes, P., Sharpe, A., McKeon, F., and Caput, D. (2000) Nature 404, 99-103[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Donehower, L. A., Harvey, M., Slagle, B. L., McArthur, M. J., Montgomery, C. A., Jr., Butel, J. S., and Bradley, A. (1992) Nature 356, 215-221[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Di Como, C. J., Gaiddon, C., and Prives, C. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 1438-1449[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Strano, S., Munarriz, E., Rossi, M., Cristofanelli, B., Shaul, Y., Castagnoli, L., Levine, A. J., Sacchi, A., Cesareni, G., Oren, M., and Blandino, G. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 29503-29512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Yang, A., Kaghad, M., Wang, Y., Gillett, E., Fleming, M. D., Dotsch, V., Andrews, N. C., Caput, D., and McKeon, F. (1998) Mol. Cell 2, 305-316[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Pozniak, C. D., Radinovic, S., Yang, A., McKeon, F., Kaplan, D. R., and Miller, F. D. (2000) Science 289, 304-306[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Liu, W., Mai, M., Yokomizo, A., Qian, C., Tindall, D. J., Smith, D. I., and Thibodeau, S. N. (2000) Int. J. Oncol. 16, 181-185[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Ng, S. W., Yiu, G. K., Liu, Y., Huang, L. W., Palnati, M., Jun, S. H., Berkowitz, R. S., and Mok, S. C. (2000) Oncogene 19, 1885-1890[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Peng, C. Y., Tsai, S. L., Yeh, C. T., Hung, S. P., Chen, M. F., Chen, T. C., Chu, C. M., and Liaw, Y. F. (2000) Anticancer Res. 20, 1487-1492[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Yang, H. W., Piao, H. Y., Chen, Y. Z., Takita, J., Kobayashi, M., Taniwaki, M., Hashizume, K., Hanada, R., Yamamoto, K., Taki, T., Bessho, F., Yanagisawa, M., and Hayashi, Y. (2000) Int. J. Mol. Med. 5, 379-384[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Agami, R., Blandino, G., Oren, M., and Shaul, Y. (1999) Nature 399, 809-813[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Gong, J. G., Costanzo, A., Yang, H. Q., Melino, G., Kaelin, W. G., Jr., Levrero, M., and Wang, J. Y. (1999) Nature 399, 806-809[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Yuan, Z. M., Shioya, H., Ishiko, T., Sun, X., Gu, J., Huang, Y. Y., Lu, H., Kharbanda, S., Weichselbaum, R., and Kufe, D. (1999) Nature 399, 814-817[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Bell, D. W., Varley, J. M., Szydlo, T. E., Kang, D. H., Wahrer, D. C., Shannon, K. E., Lubratovich, M., Verselis, S. J., Isselbacher, K. J., Fraumeni, J. F., Birch, J. M., Li, F. P., Garber, J. E., and Haber, D. A. (1999) Science 286, 2528-2531[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Chehab, N. H., Malikzay, A., Stavridi, E. S., and Halazonetis, T. D. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 13777-13782[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Chehab, N. H., Malikzay, A., Appel, M., and Halazonetis, T. D. (2000) Genes Dev. 14, 278-288[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Hirao, A., Kong, Y. Y., Matsuoka, S., Wakeham, A., Ruland, J., Yoshida, H., Liu, D., Elledge, S. J., and Mak, T. W. (2000) Science 287, 1824-1827[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Shieh, S. Y., Ahn, J., Tamai, K., Taya, Y., and Prives, C. (2000) Genes Dev. 14, 289-300[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Momand, J., Zambetti, G. P., Olson, D. C., George, D., and Levine, A. J. (1992) Cell 69, 1237-1245[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Chen, J., Marechal, V., and Levine, A. J. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 4107-4114[Abstract]
39. Haupt, Y., Maya, R., Kazaz, A., and Oren, M. (1997) Nature 387, 296-299[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Kubbutat, M. H., Jones, S. N., and Vousden, K. H. (1997) Nature 387, 299-303[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Balint, E., Bates, S., and Vousden, K. H. (1999) Oncogene 18, 3923-3929[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Dobbelstein, M., Wienzek, S., Konig, C., and Roth, J. (1999) Oncogene 18, 2101-2106[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Chi, S. W., Ayed, A., and Arrowsmith, C. H. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 4438-4445[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Thanos, C. D., and Bowie, J. U. (1999) Protein Sci. 8, 1708-1710[Abstract]
45. Lu, H., and Levine, A. J. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 5154-5158[Abstract]
46. Harlow, E., and Lane, D. (eds) (1988) Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual , 1st Ed. , pp. 519-523, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
47. Zeng, X., Keller, D., Wu, L., and Lu, H. (2000) Cancer Res. 60, 6184-6188[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Kraus, W. L., Manning, E. T., and Kadonaga, J. T. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 8123-8135[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Yuan, Z. M., Huang, Y., Ishiko, T., Nakada, S., Utsugisawa, T., Shioya, H., Utsugisawa, Y., Yokoyama, K., Weichselbaum, R., Shi, Y., and Kufe, D. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 1883-1886[Abstract/Free Full Text]
50. Bannister, A. J., and Kouzarides, T. (1996) Nature 384, 641-643[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Ogryzko, V. V., Schiltz, R. L., Russanova, V., Howard, B. H., and Nakatani, Y. (1996) Cell 87, 953-959[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.