The Protein Disulfide Isomerase-like RB60 Is Partitioned between Stroma and Thylakoids in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Chloroplasts*

Tova TrebitshDagger §, Eti MeiriDagger , Oren Ostersetzer||, Zach Adam||, and Avihai DanonDagger **

From the Dagger  Department of Plant Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science and the || Department of Agricultural Botany, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, P. O. Box 12, Rehovot 76100, Israel

Received for publication, July 6, 2000, and in revised form, November 13, 2000



    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Translation of psbA mRNA in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii chloroplasts is regulated by a redox signal(s). RB60 is a member of a protein complex that binds with high affinity to the 5'-untranslated region of psbA mRNA. RB60 has been suggested to act as a redox-sensor subunit of the protein complex regulating translation of chloroplast psbA mRNA. Surprisingly, cloning of RB60 identified high homology to the endoplasmic reticulum-localized protein disulfide isomerase, including an endoplasmic reticulum-retention signal at its carboxyl terminus. Here we show, by in vitro import studies, that the recombinant RB60 is imported into isolated chloroplasts of C. reinhardtii and pea in a transit peptide-dependent manner. Subfractionation of C. reinhardtii chloroplasts revealed that the native RB60 is partitioned between the stroma and the thylakoids. The nature of association of native RB60, and imported recombinant RB60, with thylakoids is similar and suggests that RB60 is tightly bound to thylakoids. The targeting characteristics of RB60 and the potential implications of the association of RB60 with thylakoids are discussed.



    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The chloroplast contains a small circular genome that encodes about 5-10% of the chloroplast proteins (1). The rest are encoded by the cell nucleus. This two-compartment gene organization dictates a close coordination between nuclear and organellar gene expression (2-4). Chloroplast mRNAs accumulate in fully developed chloroplasts to relatively high levels in both light- and dark-grown plants and algae. Translation of these mRNAs occurs at a much higher rate during the light-growth phase, thus identifying translation as a key regulatory point (reviewed in Refs. 2 and 4-6). The molecular basis of light-regulated translation in the chloroplast has been shown to be dependent on the function of a growing list of nucleus-encoded proteins (7-14). These factors are thought to mediate translational regulation by interacting with the 5'-untranslated region (5'-UTR)1 of chloroplast mRNAs (11, 12, 15-17). Nucleus-encoded chloroplast proteins are typically directed to the chloroplast by a transit peptide located at the amino terminus of the protein (18).

A set of mRNA-binding proteins that bind to the chloroplastic psbA mRNA 5'-UTR with high affinity and specificity has been identified and purified from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cells (19). psbA mRNA 5'-UTR-binding proteins are composed of four major proteins, RB38, RB47, RB55, and RB60. These form a complex (psbA 5'-PC) that appears to bind the mRNA via the RB47 protein. The level of binding of psbA 5'-PC to the mRNA parallels the level of psbA mRNA translation and its association with polyribosomes in light- and dark-grown wild-type C. reinhardtii (19). Moreover, several nuclear mutants have been isolated in which the loss of RB47 is accompanied by the absence of D1 synthesis due to a block in the association of psbA mRNA with polyribosomes (10, 20). This suggests that light regulates polyribosome association and translation of psbA mRNA by modulating the binding of psbA 5'-PC to the 5'-UTR. Cloning of RB47 revealed its high homology with poly(A)-binding proteins (10). Characterization of the intrachloroplast localization of RB47 showed that it is associated with thylakoids in the C. reinhardtii chloroplast (21).

RB60 has been implicated as a regulatory subunit of psbA 5'-PC which is subject to light control via phosphorylation and redox signals in the chloroplast (22, 23). Cloning of RB60 identified high homology to protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) (24). PDI-like proteins typically catalyze the formation, reduction, and isomerization of disulfide bonds during protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). However, in addition to their enzymatic role, PDI-like proteins have also been found to be indispensable subunits in protein complexes such as prolyl hydroxylase and triacylglycerol transfer protein (25). Furthermore, PDI-like proteins have recently been implicated in the regulation of E2A transcription factor (26) and the shedding of L-selectin (27). PDIs are most abundant in the lumen of the ER. They are directed to the ER by a signal peptide at the amino terminus and then are retained there by virtue of a second signal, -(K/H)DEL, at the carboxyl terminus (25, 28). The open reading frame of the recombinant RB60 (rRB60) contains an amino-terminal extension, the targeting identity of which has yet to be determined. Notably, despite the implicated function of rRB60 in the chloroplast, its open reading frame contains a carboxyl-terminal signal for ER retention (24).

Therefore, we first set out to determine whether the cloned rRB60 gene product is targeted to chloroplasts, and thereafter to study the subchloroplast localization of the native RB60. We show that rRB60 is imported into isolated C. reinhardtii and pea chloroplasts in a transit peptide-dependent fashion. Subfractionation of chloroplasts showed that whereas a portion of the native RB60 is present in the stroma, it is also found tightly bound to thylakoids. Moreover, following uptake by chloroplasts, the recombinant rRB60 associates with thylakoids in a manner similar to the native RB60. The association of RB60 to thylakoids was resistant to EDTA and RNase treatments, indicating that it is probably not mediated by binding to polysome-associated psbA mRNA.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Preparation of Intact Chloroplasts-- C. reinhardtii cw15 cells were grown in Tris/acetate/phosphate medium (29), under a 12-h light/12-h dark period at 25 °C, to a density of ~1 × 107 cells/ml. Intact chloroplasts were collected from the 45/70% interface of discontinuous Percoll gradient according to a protocol based on Goldschmidt-Clermont et al. (30) and Belknap (31).

Pea seedlings (Pisum sativum var. Alaska) were grown under standard conditions (32). Intact chloroplasts were isolated on Percoll gradients as described (32, 33).

Chlorophyll concentration was determined spectrophotometrically according to method of Arnon (34).

In Vitro Import Assays-- In vitro protein synthesis reactions were performed with a T3 TNT-coupled reticulocyte lysate system according to manufacturer's instructions (Promega) using 2 µg of DNA from RB60, Delta 28RB60, LHCII, or SSU, or pea PPO cDNA containing plasmid constructs. Translation products were fractionated by SDS-PAGE, and protein incorporation of [35S]methionine was determined by trichloroacetic acid precipitation.

In vitro import assays into intact chloroplasts were performed as described previously (32, 35). The import assay was conducted for 30 min at 25 °C in the light in the presence of 10 mM ATP, unless otherwise indicated. Competition import assays were performed in the presence of nonlabeled pea OEE1 protein, which was expressed and purified as described by Betts et al. (36). Following import, chloroplasts were pelleted by centrifugation and then resuspended in HS buffer (50 mM Hepes-KOH, pH 8, 0.33 M sorbitol). Each import reaction was divided into 3 aliquots treated with or without thermolysin (0.3 mg/ml) or with thermolysin (0.3 mg/ml) containing 1% Triton X-100 for 45 min at 4 °C. Intact chloroplasts were then re-isolated by centrifugation through a 40% Percoll cushion, washed with HS buffer containing 5 mM EDTA, and resuspended in HS buffer.

Localization of Imported rRB60 and Native RB60-- To localize RB60, we used isolated chloroplasts (10 µg of chlorophyll) or isolated chloroplasts containing imported radioactive rRB60 that were re-isolated using a 40% Percoll cushion and washed with HS buffer containing 5 mM EDTA. Stromal and thylakoid fractions were obtained by freezing and thawing, followed by a 1-min centrifugation at 15,000 × g at 4 °C (37). The resulting supernatant contained the stroma proteins, and the pellet contained the thylakoid fraction. The pellet was washed with 10 mM Hepes-KOH, pH 7.6, and centrifuged as above. Thylakoids were resuspended in 50 µl of wash solution (HS with or without 1 M NaCl or 1 M NaCl, 0.05% Triton X-100, or 0.3 mg/ml thermolysin, or 0.1 M sodium carbonate pH 11, or 10 mM EDTA, or 10 mM DTT) and incubated on ice for 30 min. Membranes were then centrifuged as above for 5 min. The supernatant was saved, and thylakoids were washed with HS buffer, centrifuged, and resuspended in 50 µl of HS.

Protein Electrophoresis and Immunoblotting-- For localization and import assays, ~2 µg chlorophyll was incubated in SDS sample buffer (3% SDS, 2.25% beta -mercaptoethanol, 6.7% glycerol, 0.133 M Tris-HCl, pH 6.8) and then fractionated by SDS-PAGE on 12% (w/v) polyacrylamide gels (38). Proteins were electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher & Schuell). Imported radiolabeled proteins were detected by autoradiography. Immunoblots were performed according to Trebitsh et al. (23). Membranes were incubated with specific antibodies (as detailed in the figure legends) and visualized by the enhanced chemiluminescence technique (SuperSignal, Pierce).


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

rRB60 Is Imported into C. reinhardtii Chloroplasts-- The targeting of proteins synthesized by cytoplasmic ribosomes to the chloroplast is typically determined by an amino-terminal transit peptide. The amino-terminal sequence of RB60, preceding the conserved sequence of PDIs, is quite different from other PDIs in both length and composition (Fig. 1) and contains a putative cleavage sequence in position 26-28 (39). To test whether the amino-terminal sequence of rRB60 could direct import into chloroplasts, radiolabeled rRB60 was synthesized in vitro and incubated with C. reinhardtii chloroplasts isolated by Percoll step gradient. Since in contrast to import by the ER, protein uptake by chloroplasts occurs post-translationally, we added the radiolabeled rRB60 only after termination of in vitro translation. Following incubation, protein that had not entered the chloroplast was degraded by treatment with the protease thermolysin. Intact chloroplasts were then repurified on a Percoll cushion and lysed with denaturing buffer, and the protein extracts were fractionated by SDS-gel electrophoresis. As seen in Fig. 2, rRB60 was imported into the chloroplasts and was protected from protease treatment (Fig. 2, lane 3), similar to a control import reaction containing in vitro synthesized chloroplast LHCII protein (Fig. 2, lane 11). Disruption of chloroplast membranes by treatment with nonionic detergent resulted in the degradation of both imported rRB60 (Fig. 2, lane 4) and LHCII proteins (Fig. 2, lane 12). These results verified the effectiveness of the protease treatment and that the radiolabeled protein was indeed protected from degradation by being taken up into chloroplasts.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Multiple sequence alignment of the amino terminus of C. reinhardtii RB60 and related protein disulfide isomerases from mammals, plants, and yeast. Multiple alignment of the polypeptides was generated using ClustalW. Homologous amino acids are shaded. The putative cleavage site for RB60 (marked by an arrow) was identified using the computer program of Nielsen et al. (39).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   rRB60 is imported into isolated C. reinhardtii chloroplasts. Import into C. reinhardtii chloroplasts was performed with in vitro synthesized, 35S-labeled RB60 (lanes 1-4), Delta 28RB60 (a deletion spanning amino acids 1-28) (lanes 5-8), and LHCII (lanes 9-12) recombinant proteins. 2% of the input translation products of RB60 (lane 1), Delta 28LRB60 (lane 5), and LHCII (lane 9) is presented. Import into chloroplasts (lanes 2, 6, and 10) was protected from thermolysin (0.3 mg/ml) degradation (Therm, lanes 3, 7, and 11). Treatment with 1% Triton X-100 (Triton, lanes 4, 8, and 12) ensured that the thermolysin-treated proteins were indeed taken up by chloroplasts. Proteins were fractionated by SDS-PAGE and electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membrane. Radiolabeled proteins were detected by autoradiography. Molecular masses of reference proteins (kDa) are shown on the left.

To assay whether the import into chloroplasts was determined by its amino-terminal sequence, a leaderless version of rRB60 (lacking the first 28 amino acids, Delta 28RB60) was prepared and subjected to chloroplast import assays. The leaderless rRB60 was not imported by isolated chloroplasts (Fig. 2, lane 7), corroborating the proposed function of the amino-terminal sequence of RB60 as a chloroplast transit peptide required for import into chloroplasts. The mobility of the chloroplast-imported rRB60 was similar to that of its in vitro translated precursor (Fig. 2, lanes 1 and 3), and it corresponded to the mobility of the native RB60 in immunoblot assays (data not shown). In contrast, the mobility of the Delta 28RB60 was slightly higher (Fig. 2, lane 5), suggesting that the transit peptide may not be cleaved after import as shown for the thylakoid-associated kinase, TAK1 (40).

The Targeting of rRB60 Is Conserved in Chloroplasts of Higher Plants-- Next, we assayed whether rRB60 would also be taken up by the well established system of highly purified pea chloroplasts. We chose pea polyphenol oxidase (Ps-PPO) as a control for the import activity of the isolated pea chloroplasts and C. reinhardtii small subunit of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (Cr-SSU) as a control for import of a heterologous protein. All proteins were incubated with chloroplasts post-in vitro translation. As seen in the autoradiogram in Fig. 3A, both pea PPO and C. reinhardtii SSU were imported into the chloroplasts and were protected from protease treatment (Fig. 3A, lanes 3 and 7). Disruption of chloroplast membranes by treating with nonionic detergent resulted in degradation of the imported Ps-PPO and Cr-SSU proteins (Fig. 3A, lanes 4 and 8). These results demonstrated the intactness and capacity of the isolated pea chloroplasts to import C. reinhardtii chloroplast-targeted proteins in vitro. In a manner comparable to Cr-SSU, rRB60 of C. reinhardtii was imported into the isolated pea chloroplasts, as reflected by its protection from protease degradation in the presence of intact chloroplast membranes (Fig. 3B, compare lanes 3 and 4). As with rRB60 imported into C. reinhardtii chloroplasts (Fig. 2), the mobility of rRB60 imported into pea chloroplasts corresponded to that of its precursor (Fig. 3B, lanes 1 and 3). The import of rRB60 into pea chloroplasts was dependent upon its amino terminus, as removal of the rRB60 leader abolished import (Fig. 3B, lanes 6 and 7).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   rRB60 is imported into isolated pea chloroplasts. A, autoradiogram showing import of control proteins into pea chloroplasts. Ps-PPO denotes pea polyphenol oxidase; Cr-SSU denotes small subunit of Rubisco of C. reinhardtii. B, autoradiogram showing import of C. reinhardtii rRB60 recombinant proteins into pea chloroplasts. Delta 28RB60 is a deletion of amino acids 1-28 of RB60. In vitro synthesis of 35S-labeled recombinant proteins, import into pea chloroplasts, and detection of the imported proteins were performed as described in Fig. 2. C, autoradiogram of ATP-dependent import of recombinant RB60 into pea chloroplasts. Thermolysin-protected import into pea chloroplasts was performed as in Fig. 2, lane 3, except that import was performed in the absence (lane 1) or in the presence (lane 2) of 10 mM Mg-ATP. D, autoradiogram showing competition by import of nonradiolabeled pea OEE1 protein. Thermolysin-protected import into chloroplasts was performed as in Fig. 2, lane 3. Import reactions were performed in the presence of increased amounts (nanomoles) of the precursor pea OEE1 protein, as indicated above each lane. E, immunoblot analysis of BiP, an ER protein. Total proteins extract of tobacco leaves (Tobacco, lane 1), pea leaves (Pea Total, lane 2), and isolated pea chloroplasts (Pea Chlps, lane 3) or cells of C. reinhardtii (Cr Total, lane 4) and isolated C. reinhardtii chloroplasts (Cr Chlps, lane 5) were fractionated by SDS-PAGE, electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membrane, and decorated with antibodies specific to tobacco BiP (41) and pea OEE1 (52) (lanes 1-3) and antibodies specific to yeast BiP and C. reinhardtii OEE2 (lanes 4 and 5).

To reaffirm the import of rRB60 into chloroplasts, we tested whether its import exhibits additional characteristics typical of chloroplast import. The findings that the uptake of rRB60 was enhanced in the presence of ATP (Fig. 3C) and was competed by the pea chloroplast protein OEE1 (Fig. 3D) corroborate this. To rule out the possibility of contaminating ER in the import reactions, we assayed the purity of the isolated chloroplasts. Fig. 3E shows that antibodies raised against the tobacco ER protein BiP (41) reacted against pea BiP in total protein extract of leaves but not of isolated chloroplasts. Similar results were obtained for C. reinhardtii chloroplasts using antibodies raised against the yeast BiP (Fig. 3E). This indicates that the isolated chloroplasts used were devoid of ER and that rRB60 was taken up by the chloroplasts. The import of rRB60 into both C. reinhardtii and pea chloroplasts suggests that it is directed to chloroplasts in vivo and that this capacity is conserved in higher plants.

RB60 Is Partitioned between Stroma and Thylakoids-- Import to C. reinhardtii and pea chloroplasts, in a transit peptide-dependent manner, indicated that the nucleus-encoded RB60 contains a chloroplast targeting signal. To identify the subchloroplast localization of native RB60, we lysed isolated C. reinhardtii chloroplasts, and we separated the thylakoid fraction from the supernatant containing the stroma proteins by centrifugation. The purity of the stromal fraction was determined by the absence of thylakoid-associated OEE2 and CF1 proteins, and the purity of the thylakoid fraction was verified by the lack of stromal ClpC protein (Fig. 4A). RB60 was present in both the stroma and thylakoid fractions of C. reinhardtii chloroplasts (Fig. 4A, lanes 2 and 3). The proportion of RB60 in these fractions fluctuated in several replications of this assay (data not shown). However, we routinely observed about 50% of the pool of C. reinhardtii chloroplast RB60 to be associated with thylakoids.



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Subchloroplast localization of C. reinhardtii RB60. A, immunoblot analysis of native RB60. Percoll-purified C. reinhardtii or pea chloroplasts (Chlps, lanes 1 and 4) were lysed by freezing and thawing. Stromal (St, lanes 2 and 5) and thylakoid fractions were separated by centrifugation. Thylakoid membranes were washed with 10 mM Hepes-KOH, pH 7.6 (T, lanes 3 and 6). Immunoblot analysis of C. reinhardtii (C.r. panel) and pea (Pea panel) chloroplast proteins was performed using antibodies directed against C. reinhardtii RB60 (23), OEE2 and CF1 proteins, and against pea OEE1 (52) and ClpC protein (53), and spinach CF1 (54). B, autoradiogram of recombinant RB60 imported into C. reinhardtii (C.r. panel) or pea (Pea panel) chloroplasts. Thermolysin-protected import into chloroplasts (Chlps, lanes 1 and 4) was performed as in Fig. 2, lane 3. Stromal (St, lanes 2 and 5) and thylakoid fractions (T, lanes 3 and 6) were obtained as in A. Imported radiolabeled proteins were visualized as in Fig. 2.

To check whether following import rRB60 is also directed toward the thylakoid membranes, we assayed the association of imported rRB60 with thylakoids. Both C. reinhardtii and pea chloroplasts containing imported radiolabeled rRB60 were disrupted and fractionated as in Fig. 4A. Most of the imported rRB60 was found associated with thylakoids of C. reinhardtii chloroplasts, whereas the proportion of soluble rRB60 was higher in pea chloroplasts (Fig. 4B). Together, these results suggest that at least some of the pool of chloroplast RB60 is associated with thylakoids.

The Nature of the Association of RB60 with Thylakoids-- Next, we studied the nature of the association between native RB60 and C. reinhardtii thylakoids by washing purified thylakoids with high salt (1 M NaCl) with or without 0.05% Triton X-100, or with alkali buffer (0.1 M Na2CO3, pH 11), or by treating with the protease thermolysin (0.1 mg/ml) (Fig. 5). Thylakoid membranes were then isolated by centrifugation, and the resistance of thylakoid-associated RB60 to each of these treatments was determined by immunoblot assay comparing the amounts of thylakoid-associated and released soluble RB60. The nature of the association of RB60 with thylakoids was compared with that of the peripheral thylakoid membrane proteins CF1 and OEE2. Similar to CF1 and OEE2, most of the RB60 remained bound to the thylakoids after a wash with 1 M NaCl or 0.1 M Na2CO3, pH 11 (Fig. 5, lanes 2, 3, 6, and 7), suggesting that RB60 is tightly bound to the thylakoids. The inclusion of 0.05% Triton X-100 in the salt wash completely removed RB60 from the thylakoids, whereas it had only a mild impact on CF1 and OEE2 (Fig. 5, lanes 4 and 5). These results suggest that RB60 is a peripheral protein and that its association with thylakoids may be mediated, at least in part, by hydrophobic interactions. The protease treatment removed RB60 exclusively from the thylakoids leaving the CF1 and OEE2 proteins intact (Fig. 5, lanes 8 and 9), suggesting that RB60 is located on the stromal face of the thylakoids.



View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Association of native RB60 with C. reinhardtii thylakoid membranes. Thylakoid membranes (obtained as in Fig. 4A) were washed with buffers containing 1 M NaCl, 1 M NaCl, and 0.05% Triton X-100 or 0.1 M Na2CO3, pH 11, or subjected to a protease treatment (thermolysin (Therm), 0.1 mg/ml) and each separated into membrane-associated (P) and soluble (S) fractions. Immunoblot analysis of each fraction was performed with antibodies against C. reinhardtii RB60, OEE2, and CF1.

Furthermore, we tested whether imported rRB60 displays the same type of thylakoid association as the native RB60. Following import of radiolabeled rRB60 to C. reinhardtii chloroplasts, thylakoid membranes were challenged with the same treatments as in Fig. 5. Similar to the native RB60 (Fig. 5), most of the imported thylakoid-associated rRB60 was resistant to high salt and alkali washes (Fig. 6, lanes 2, 3, 6, and 7) and sensitive to a wash with 1 M NaCl including 0.05% Triton X-100 (Fig. 6, lanes 4 and 5) and to treatment with thermolysin (Fig. 6, lanes 8 and 9). The same type of association with thylakoids was observed with rRB60 imported into pea chloroplasts (Fig. 6, lanes 1-9). Together, these data further corroborate the authenticity of rRB60 and suggest that at least a portion of chloroplast RB60 is tightly bound to the stromal face of the thylakoids.



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Association of imported rRB60 with C. reinhardtii and pea thylakoid membranes. Thermolysin-protected import into C. reinhardtii (C.r panel) and pea (Pea panel) chloroplasts was performed as in Fig. 2, lane 3. Following import, thylakoid membranes were isolated and treated as in Fig. 4 producing membrane-associated (P) and soluble (S) fractions. Radiolabeled proteins were detected by autoradiography.

RB60 has been shown to contain reactive thiols (23). This raises the possibility that the thylakoid association of RB60 is mediated by formation of a mixed disulfide bond with a thylakoid protein. In this case, the association of RB60 with thylakoids would be expected to be sensitive to reduction. To test this, we washed isolated thylakoids with buffer containing 10 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) (Fig. 7, lanes 2 and 3). The resistance of thylakoid-associated RB60 to reduction by DTT did not corroborate the assumption. RB60 was initially isolated and characterized as a component of a protein complex showing high affinity to the 5'-UTR of psbA mRNA (19). Because translation of psbA mRNA is by thylakoid-bound polyribosomes (42, 43), RB60 may associate with thylakoids by binding to the 5'-UTR of polysomes-associated psbA mRNA. The resistance of the RB60-thylakoid association to a wash with 10 mM EDTA (which dissociates ribosomes) (Fig. 7, lanes 4 and 5) and to treatment with RNase A (data not shown) indicates otherwise. Therefore, it is conceivable that RB60 associates with thylakoids either directly or as part of a protein complex.



View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Thylakoid association of native RB60 is not mediated by ribosome or mixed disulfide interactions. Thylakoid membranes (T, lane 1) and washes (lanes 2-5) were performed as in Fig. 4 except that wash solutions included 10 mM DTT (lanes 2 and 3) or 10 mM EDTA (EDTA, lanes 4 and 5) producing membrane-associated (P) and soluble (S) fractions. Immunoblot analysis of each fraction was performed with antibodies against C. reinhardtii RB60, OEE2, and CF1.



    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

RB60 was first isolated as a component of a protein complex (psbA 5'-PC) which assembles with high affinity on the 5'-UTR of C. reinhardtii chloroplast psbA mRNA (19). Consistent with the predicted location of RB60, antisera raised against RB60 cross-reacted with a single protein in C. reinhardtii chloroplasts (23). However, the cloning of rRB60 depicted a PDI-like protein containing a putative amino-terminal leader sequence, whose targeting information was unknown, and an ER-retention signal, -KDEL, at the carboxyl-end of the protein (24). This prompted us to investigate the authenticity of the recombinant rRB60 by testing whether its amino terminus can direct import by chloroplasts. We showed that rRB60 is imported into both C. reinhardtii and pea chloroplasts in a transit peptide-dependent process (Figs. 2 and 3), indicating that RB60 is directed by its amino-terminal sequence to chloroplasts in vivo. The import of rRB60 displayed several characteristics typical of chloroplast import, such as post-translational import, ATP-dependent import, and sensitivity to a competing import of a nonlabeled chloroplast protein (Fig. 3 and Fig. 4, B and C). The authenticity of rRB60 was further substantiated by the similar intrachloroplast localization of the native RB60 and the imported rRB60 (Fig. 4). The reason for the presence of a -KDEL signal in the carboxyl terminus of rRB60 is yet unknown. It may be cryptic and may represent a potential signature of the evolution of RB60 from an ancestral PDI gene. Alternatively, RB60 may have dual functions as follows: one in the chloroplast and a second in the ER. Such polytopic proteins, present in both the mitochondrion and an additional cell compartment, have been described (44). Polytopic targeting of mitochondrial proteins has been suggested to arise either from export mechanisms from the mitochondria (44) or, alternatively, via dual targeting by a unique amino terminus signal peptide (45). We are currently studying whether RB60 is also an ER protein.

In the chloroplast, RB60 is partitioned between the stroma and the thylakoids (Figs. 4-6). A second component of psbA 5'-PC, the RB47 protein, has also been shown to be tightly bound to thylakoids (21). The finding of RB60 and RB47 as membrane-associated proteins suggests a regulatory membrane-associated step in the expression of psbA mRNA. Translation of chloroplast mRNAs encoding integral thylakoid proteins is via membrane-bound polyribosomes (42, 43). Therefore, it is possible that RB60 attaches to thylakoids by binding to the 5'-UTR of polysome-associated psbA mRNA. However, the association of RB60 with thylakoids is resistant to washes containing EDTA and treatment with RNase A, suggesting that the binding is not mediated by membrane-bound ribosomes. This, however, does not rule out the possibility that some amount of RB60 was associated with psbA mRNA and was washed away from the thylakoids in our Mg2+-free washes.

An alternative explanation for the membrane association of 5'-UTR-interacting proteins has been invoked by genetic studies showing many parallels in translational regulation in C. reinhardtii chloroplast and Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondrion (2, 3, 46). In the latter, the cox3 mRNA translation activator proteins, PET54, PET122, PET494, form a complex that has the capacity for three-way interaction with the 5'-UTR, the small ribosomal subunit, and the inner mitochondrial membrane (47). This three-way association suggests that the yeast translational activators tether the mitochondrion mRNA to the inner membrane (46). Similar function has been proposed for the proteins binding the 5'-UTR of chloroplast mRNAs, encoding thylakoid membrane proteins (2, 3). The detection of tight binding of RB60 (Figs. 4-6) and RB47 (21) to thylakoids corroborates this model. Furthermore, the characterization of RB60 as a peripheral protein localized on the stromal face of the thylakoids (Fig. 5) is consistent with this proposed function of 5'-UTR-binding proteins in the chloroplast. However, thylakoid association is not common to all translational regulators: CRP1, a regulator of petA and petD mRNAs in maize, was found to be part of a soluble high molecular weight complex and not to be associated with chloroplast membranes (14).

The finding of specific oxidizing activity of RB60 (23) suggests an additional reason for the RB60-thylakoid association. Recently, a novel yeast protein, ERO1, whose function is to oxidize PDI, has been identified and shown to be membrane-localized (48, 49). Likewise, in Escherichia coli, the source of oxidizing equivalents necessary for protein disulfide catalysis has been shown to be membranal electron transport (50, 51). By analogy with these studies, one may hypothesize that the photosynthetic electron transport of the thylakoid is the source of oxidizing equivalents for RB60. If so, this might necessitate the close association of RB60 with thylakoids.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank E. Harel for help with the protein chloroplast import assays and for providing us with the polyphenol oxidase construct; S. Mayfield for the C.r. OEE2 and CF1 antisera; Z. Gromet-Elhanan for the spinach CF1 antisera; A. Vitale for the tobacco BiP antisera; and G. Galili for critical reading of this manuscript. We thank T. Danon for assistance with antiserum production.


    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by grants from the Israel Science Foundation and the Minerva Foundation.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Recipient of a Feinberg postdoctoral fellowship.

Recipient of a Feinberg Graduate School fellowship.

** Holds The Judith and Martin Freedman Career Developmental Chair. To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 972-8-934-2382; Fax: 972-8-934-4181; E-mail: avihai.danon@weizmann.ac.il.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, November 21, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M005950200


    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: UTR, untranslated region; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; PDI, protein disulfide isomerase; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; DTT, dithiothreitol; PPO, polyphenol oxidase; SSU, small subunit of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase; PC, protein complex.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES


1. Sugiura, M., Hirose, T., and Sugita, M. (1998) Annu. Rev. Genet. 32, 437-459[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Gillham, N. W., Boynton, J. E., and Hauser, C. R. (1994) Annu. Rev. Genet. 28, 71-93[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Rochaix, J.-D. (1996) Plant Mol. Biol. 32, 327-341[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Mayfield, S. P., Yohn, C. B., Cohen, A., and Danon, A. (1995) Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 46, 147-166[CrossRef]
5. Danon, A. (1997) Plant Physiol. 115, 1293-1298[Free Full Text]
6. Stern, D. B., Higgs, D. C., and Yang, J. J. (1997) Trends Plant Sci. 2, 308-315[CrossRef]
7. Jensen, K. H., Herrin, D. L., Plumley, F. G., and Schmidt, G. W. (1986) J. Cell Biol. 103, 1315-1325[Abstract]
8. Kuchka, M. R., Mayfield, S. P., and Rochaix, J.-D. (1988) EMBO J. 7, 319-324
9. Girard-Bascou, J., Pierre, Y., and Drapier, D. (1992) Curr. Genet. 22, 47-52[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Yohn, C. B., Cohen, A., Danon, A., and Mayfield, S. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 2238-2243[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Zerges, W., Girard-Bascou, J., and Rochaix, J.-D. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 3440-3448[Abstract]
12. Stampacchia, O., Girard-Bascou, J., Zanasco, J. L., Zerges, W., Bennoun, P., and Rochaix, J.-D. (1997) Plant Cell 9, 773-782[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. McCormac, D. J., and Barkan, A. (1999) Plant Cell 11, 1709-1716[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Fisk, D. G., Walker, M. B., and Barkan, A. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 2621-2630[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Zerges, W., and Rochaix, J.-D. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 5268-5277[Abstract]
16. Sakamoto, W., Chen, X., Kindle, K. L., and Stern, D. B. (1994) Plant J. 6, 503-512[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Mayfield, S. P., Cohen, A., Danon, A., and Yohn, C. B. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 127, 1537-1545[Abstract]
18. Keegstra, K., and Cline, K. (1999) Plant Cell 11, 557-570[Free Full Text]
19. Danon, A., and Mayfield, S. P. (1991) EMBO J. 10, 3993-4001[Abstract]
20. Yohn, C. B., Cohen, A., Danon, A., and Mayfield, S. P. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 3560-3566[Abstract]
21. Zerges, W., and Rochaix, J.-D. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 140, 101-110[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Danon, A., and Mayfield, S. P. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 2227-2235[Abstract]
23. Trebitsh, T., Levitan, A., Sofer, A., and Danon, A. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 1116-1123[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Kim, J., and Mayfield, S. P. (1997) Science 278, 1954-1957[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Freedman, R. B., Hirst, T. R., and Tuite, M. F. (1994) Trends Biochem. Sci. 19, 331-336[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Markus, M., and Benezra, R. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 1040-1049[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Bennett, T. A., Edwards, B. S., Sklar, L. A., and Rogelj, S. (2000) J. Immunol. 164, 4120-4129[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Pelham, H. R. (1990) Trends Biochem. Sci. 15, 483-486[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Gorman, D. S., and Levine, R. P. (1965) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 54, 1665-1669[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Goldschmidt-Clermont, M., Malnoe, P., and Rochaix, J.-D. (1989) Plant Physiol. 89, 15-18
31. Belknap, W. R. (1983) Plant Physiol. 72, 1130-1132
32. Koussevitzky, S., Ne'eman, E., Sommer, A., Steffens, J. C., and Harel, E. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 27064-27069[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Cline, K. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 14804-14810[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Arnon, D. (1949) Plant Physiol. 24, 1-15
35. Adam, Z., and Hoffman, N. E. (1993) Plant Physiol. 102, 35-43[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Betts, S. D., Hachigian, T. M., Pichersky, E., and Yocum, C. F. (1994) Plant Mol. Biol. 26, 117-130[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Ostersetzer, O., Tabak, S., Yarden, O., Shapira, R., and Adam, Z. (1996) Eur. J. Biochem. 236, 932-936[Abstract]
38. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Nielsen, H., Engelbrecht, J., Brunak, S., and von Heijne, G. (1997) Protein Eng. 10, 1-6[Abstract]
40. Snyders, S., and Kohorn, B. D. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 9137-9140[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Pedrazzini, E., Giovinazzo, G., Bollini, R., Ceriotti, A., and Vitale, A. (1994) Plant J. 5, 103-110[CrossRef]
42. Harris, E. H., Boynton, J. E., and Gillham, N. W. (1994) Microbiol. Rev. 58, 700-754[Abstract]
43. Minami, E., and Watanabe, A. (1984) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 235, 562-570[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Soltys, B. J., and Gupta, R. S. (1999) Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, 174-177[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Bhagwat, S. V., Biswas, G., Anandatheerthavarada, H. K., Addya, S., Pandak, W., and Avadhani, N. G. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 24014-24022[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Fox, T. (1996) Experientia (Basel) 52, 1130-1135
47. Brown, N. G., Costanzo, M. C., and Fox, T. D. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 1045-1053[Abstract]
48. Pollard, M. G., Travers, K. J., and Weissman, J. S. (1998) Mol. Cell 1, 171-182[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Frand, A. R., and Kaiser, C. A. (1998) Mol. Cell 1, 161-170[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Bader, M., Muse, W., Ballou, D. P., Gassner, C., and Bardwell, J. C. (1999) Cell 98, 217-227[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Kobayashi, T., and Ito, K. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 1192-1198[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52. Itzhaki, H., Naveh, L., Lindahl, M., Cook, M., and Adam, Z. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 7094-7098[Abstract/Free Full Text]
53. Ostersetzer, O., and Adam, Z. (1996) Plant Mol. Biol. 31, 673-676[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Avital, S., and Gromet-Elhanan, Z. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 7067-7072[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.