Acidic Hydrolysis as a Mechanism for the Cleavage of the Glu298 right-arrow  Asp Variant of Human Endothelial Nitric-oxide Synthase*

Todd A. FairchildDagger, David Fulton, Jason T. Fontana, Jean-Philippe Gratton§, Timothy J. McCabe, and William C. Sessa

From the Department of Pharmacology, Boyer Center for Molecular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06536

Received for publication, April 24, 2001


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The 894Gright-arrowT polymorphism within exon 7 of the human endothelial nitric-oxide synthase (eNOS) gene codes for glutamate or aspartate, respectively, at residue 298 and has been associated with several diseases of cardiovascular origin. A recent report indicates that Asp298-eNOS (E298D) is cleaved intracellularly to 100- and 35-kDa fragments, suggesting a mechanism for reduced endothelial function. Here we have documented the precise cleavage site of the E298D variant as a unique aspartyl-prolyl (Asp298-Pro299) bond not seen in wild-type eNOS (Glu298). We show that E298D-eNOS, as isolated from cells and in vitro, is susceptible to acidic hydrolysis, and the 100-kDa fragment can be generated ex vivo by increasing temperature at low pH. Importantly, cleavage of E298D was eliminated using a sample buffer system designed to limit acidic hydrolysis of Asp-Pro bonds. These results argue against intracellular processing of E298D-eNOS and suggest that previously described fragmentation of E298D could be a product of sample preparation. We also found that eNOS turnover, NO production, and the susceptibility to cellular stress were not different in cells expressing WT versus E298D-eNOS. Finally, enzyme activities were identical for the respective recombinant enzymes. Thus, intracellular cleavage mechanisms are unlikely to account for associations between the exon 7 polymorphism and cardiovascular diseases.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Endothelium-derived nitric oxide (NO)1 plays a prominent role in regulating systemic blood pressure and maintaining vascular homeostasis. NO has also been recognized as an important mediator of structural changes in the vasculature, including flow and injury evoked vascular remodeling and angiogenesis (1-3). Within endothelial cells that line the lumen of all blood vessels, endothelial nitric-oxide synthase (eNOS) catalyzes calcium-calmodulin-dependent NO synthesis through the conversion of L-arginine to L-citrulline and NO (4). Dysfunction of the endothelium, often associated with a reduction in the activity or expression of eNOS or NO bioreactivity, is a hallmark of cardiovascular diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, heart failure and atherosclerosis (5). Given the importance of eNOS to cardiovascular function, the investigation into whether mutations or polymorphisms within the eNOS gene correlate with increased risk of cardiovascular disease has become an active area of research.

The human eNOS gene has 26 exon regions and covers 21 kilobase pairs on the long arm of chromosome 7 (6). To date, there are no positive studies demonstrating that mutations in the eNOS gene are causally linked to a disease process using traditional linkage analysis (7). However, in patients with coronary spasm (8) or renal disease (9), polymorphisms within the eNOS promoter have been postulated to impact levels of mRNA and protein, whereas in patients with coronary artery disease (10) or hypertension (11) polymorphisms within exon regions of eNOS may affect enzyme function. Conversely, many other studies do not show associations of the above polymorphisms with the disease (7).

The exon 7 polymorphism (894Gright-arrowT) that specifies either a glutamate (E) or aspartate (D) residue at position 298 in the human eNOS protein has been analyzed in several patient populations with coronary artery disease, hypertension, and cerebral vascular disease (12-14). This polymorphism is of particular interest because this conservative amino acid substitution within the oxygenase domain of eNOS may influence eNOS function. Within each disease category, there is evidence both for and against this polymorphism influencing eNOS and/or endothelial function. For example, two groups have differing results concerning the association of the exon 7 polymorphism and essential hypertension in the Japanese population (11, 15).

Based upon the crystal structure of the oxygenase domain of eNOS, the substitution of a glutamate residue for an aspartate at position 298 within the protein is unlikely to alter protein conformation to an appreciable extent (16). However, a recent report demonstrated that eNOS, as isolated from patients with an 894T allele (coding for aspartate at residue 298), was cleaved intracellularly by an unknown protease, thus providing a possible mechanism to explain an impairment in eNOS function (17). Because most aspects of the proposed intracellular cleavage remain to be determined, we sought to: 1) elucidate the mechanism whereby the Glu298 right-arrow Asp variant of eNOS (E298D) is cleaved and 2) further characterize enzymatic differences between wild-type eNOS and cleaved E298D eNOS in cells and in vitro.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Generation of Wild-type (WT) Human eNOS and E298D eNOS cDNA-- Total RNA from single-donor human umbilical vein endothelial cells was isolated with TriZol reagent and subjected to reverse transcriptase-PCR using an oligo(dT)17 primer. The reverse transcriptase-PCR product corresponding to human eNOS was PCR-amplified using the forward primer 5'-ccccgccaaagcttggacgcacagtaccatgggcaacttgaagagcg-3' and the reverse primer 5'-ggggctctagaggcggacctgagtcgggcagccgc-3'. The amplified product was ligated into (HindIII and XbaI) pcDNA3.1 (Invitrogen) mammalian expression vector. The wild-type human eNOS sequence was verified by DNA sequencing. The generation of E298D eNOS cDNA was performed by site-directed mutagenesis (QuikChange, Stratagene) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Complementary primers were used for mutagenesis (+ strand oligonucleotide: 5'-gcccctgctgctgcaggctccggatgatcccccagaactcttcc-3'). A 898-base pair fragment containing the mutation was subcloned into the original WT vector (FseI and NheI), and the DNA sequence was verified across the mutation site. All DNA sequencing and oligonucleotide synthesis were carried out at the W. M. Keck Biotechnology Resource Center at Yale University School of Medicine.

Cell Culture and Reagents-- Unless otherwise noted, COS-7 cells were cultured in high glucose Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum, penicillin, streptomycin, and L-glutamine as described previously (18). Unless otherwise noted, an equal number of cells were seeded in 60-mm dishes, such that, typically, 24 h later the cells were 90% confluent and ready for transfection. Transfections were carried out using LipofectAMINE 2000 (Life Technologies) following the manufacturer's protocol. In some experiments, transfected COS cells were treated with varying conditions to evoke cell stress. To examine the effects of hypoxia, the transfected cells were placed into an incubator and equilibrated with 1% oxygen for 48 h, as described previously (19). To trigger cellular apoptosis, COS cells were treated with staurosporine (1 µM) for 6 h (20). To initiate oxidative stress, transfected cells were incubated with H2O2 (5 mM) for 30 min. At the end of each incubation period, samples were prepared for electrophoresis using the NUPAGE buffer system (described below).

Western Blot of Total Cell Lysates-- For all experiments on lysates (except when intentionally altering pH), 48 h post-transfection COS-7 cells were lysed in modified radioimmune precipitation buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM EGTA, 0.1% SDS, 0.1% deoxycholic acid, 1 mM Pefabloc, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, and 2 µg/ml pepstatin). Sample preparation for SDS-PAGE was performed using either the traditional Laemmli method (21) or the commercial NUPAGE system (Novex/Invitrogen) that was designed to limit in vitro degradation of protein samples. A Laemmli-style loading buffer (6× concentrated SDS/Tris-based buffer/dye at pH 6.8 (22 °C) with beta -mercaptoethanol) was added to the samples, and the samples were boiled at 100 °C for 5 min. Alternatively, we followed the protocols of the NUPAGE system, where a lithium dodecyl sulfate (LDS) sample buffer (Tris/glycerol buffer, pH 8.5) was mixed with fresh dithiothreitol and added to samples. The LDS samples were then heated to 70 °C for 10 min. All cell lysates were separated by electrophoresis on 7.5% polyacrylamide gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. WT and the E298D eNOS were detected using a monoclonal antibody (Transduction Laboratories, N30020) directed at the carboxyl terminus of human eNOS, an epitope conserved in WT and E298D eNOS.

Isolation and Sequencing of 100-kDa Fragment-- Ten plates of COS-7 cells (100-m plates) were transfected with WT or E298D eNOS cDNA. Cells were lysed with modified radioimmune precipitation buffer, and eNOS was isolated using 2'-5' ADP-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) as described previously (22). Bound proteins were eluted by adding one volume of Laemmli-style sample buffer to the Sepharose bed and boiling for 5 min in a 100 °C block heater. Eluted proteins were subjected to a 7.5% SDS-PAGE and then transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. Proteins were visualized by staining the membrane with a Coomassie Brilliant Blue stain (Sigma), and the unique 100-kDa band generated from the E298D mutant was sequenced by Edman degradation (W. M. Keck Biotechnology Resource Center at Yale University School of Medicine).

Generation of Purified Human eNOS from Escherichia coli-- WT and E298D cDNAs were subcloned into the bacterial expression vector pCW (NdeI and XbaI). pCW-WT or pCW-E298D were transformed into BL-21 E. coli together with a vector coding for the chaperone proteins groES and groEL. Bacterial culture, induction, and eNOS purification were performed as previously described (23).

Preparation of Cell Lysates at Acidic pH-- Phosphate-citrate buffer solutions were mixed to pH 7.0, 5.0, and 3.0. Transfected cells were harvested using the above pH lysis solutions (buffers plus 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM EGTA, 0.1% SDS, 1 mM Pefabloc, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, and 2 µg/ml pepstatin). Lysates were rotated for 10 h at 37 °C. Lysates were adjusted to pH 7.4 using sodium hydroxide and prepared for SDS-PAGE using NUPAGE sample preparation.

NO Release Assay-- Chemiluminescent measurement of nitrite in media was performed as described previously (25). Basal levels of NO release were acquired by sampling media from cells just prior to harvesting (48 h post-transfection).

Biochemical Assays on Purified eNOS-- Hemoglobin capture assays and cytochrome c reduction assays were all performed as described previously (22).

Pulse-Chase Experiments-- Twelve hours post-transfection, confluent COS-7 cells from 100 mm cell culture plates were trypsinized and divided equally into 60-mm cell plates. Cells were grown to 70% confluency in complete medium. Medium was changed to methionine/cystine-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) for 20 min prior to labeling. 35S-labeled methionine/cysteine (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) was added to methionine/cystine-deficient medium, and cells were incubated with the 150 µCi/ml 35S medium (2 ml) for 1 h. Cells were rinsed quickly and incubated in complete Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium before harvesting at various time points. Lysates were immunoprecipitated using anti-eNOS antibody (Transduction Laboratories) and protein A-Sepharose. Eluted proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE. Gels were dried for 3 h and then exposed to film at -80 °C for 12 h. Band intensity at 135 kDa was assayed by densitometry (26).

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The allele frequency of the 894G polymorphism is greater than the 894T variant in populations studied to date (e.g. 67.5% in Australians and 92.2% in Japanese (27)). For this reason we have termed eNOS with glutamate at 298 as wild type and eNOS with aspartate at 298 as E298D eNOS. Recently it was shown that E298D eNOS may undergo enhanced intracellular cleavage (17). To investigate the mechanism of this cleavage, we transiently expressed both polymorphic versions of eNOS in COS-7 cells that do not express eNOS endogenously. As seen in Fig. 1A, a unique 100-kDa cleavage fragment (see arrow) was present in cell lysates containing the E298D eNOS, as previously reported (17). As the antibody used was raised against an epitope derived from the extreme carboxyl terminus of human eNOS, it was apparent that the cleavage took place within the amino-terminal domain of the protein. To determine the precise location of the cleaved bond, we isolated the 100-kDa fragment and sequenced the amino terminus by Edman degradation. The sequenced portion of the fragment corresponds precisely to residues Pro299 through Val310 of eNOS, showing that E298D eNOS was cleaved on the carboxyl side of the aspartate at position 298, as depicted in Fig. 1B.


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Glutamate to aspartate substitution at residue 298 creates a labile Asp-Pro bond in human eNOS. A, COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with vectors coding for the WT or Glu298 right-arrow Asp variant (E298D) of eNOS. Lysates were Western blotted using a carboxyl-terminal eNOS monoclonal antibody. An arrow indicates a unique 100-kDa band in the E298D lysate. In B, Edman sequencing of the purified 100-kDa fragment confirms cleavage at the Asp298-Pro299 bond.

Because the cleavage site occurred at the Asp-Pro bond, we searched for proteases that may cleave at this site and found none. However, it has been recognized for many years that Asp-Pro bonds are particularly susceptible to acid hydrolysis (28). In fact, one criticism of using the method of Laemmli when preparing samples for SDS-PAGE is that proteins are boiled in an acidic solution, a combination of conditions that can cause significant protein degradation (29). Although the Tris-based loading buffers commonly used in SDS-PAGE are near neutral pH (6.8), the solutions become significantly more acidic when heated. (For example, a 50 mM Tris buffer with pH 6.8 at 22 °C will drop to pH 5.3 at 100 °C.) Therefore, before investigating an in vivo mechanism of eNOS fragmentation, we investigated whether the cleavage phenomenon could be an artifact of our sample preparation method. As shown in Fig. 2A, when we used Laemmli-style buffers and increased the boiling time during sample preparation, we saw increased generation of the 100-kDa fragment of interest in E298D samples (arrow; compare 100-kDa fragment in lanes 3-8). All other degradation bands were found in both WT and E298D eNOS. Importantly, when we used a commercially available sample buffer containing LDS formulated to maintain a more basic pH throughout sample preparation, we observed absolutely no fragmentation of E298D (compare lanes 1 and 2 with lanes 3-8). This suggests that the unique 100-kDa fragment generated in E298D eNOS may arise from acid hydrolysis of the Asp-Pro bond. Next, we surmised that if the cleavage of E298D eNOS occurs intracellularly, this should be reflected in a change in protein half-life relative to WT. To examine this hypothesis directly, we performed pulse-chase studies to determine the biosynthetic half-life of WT versus E298D eNOS. As shown in Fig. 2B, the half-lives of the two proteins were virtually indistinguishable and close to the reported values (26). From these experiments, we conclude that sample preparation alone could account for cleavage of E298D eNOS and that the turnover of the two proteins was not different.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Cleavage of E298D eNOS to a 100-kDa fragment can result from ex vivo sample preparation, and no difference is observed in in vivo half-life. A, COS-7 cells transiently expressing WT or E298D eNOS were lysed in either 1) LDS buffer or 2) Laemmli buffer and subjected to SDS-PAGE. Samples prepared in LDS buffer were subjected to 70 °C for 10 min before loading onto the gel. Samples prepared in Laemmli-style buffer were boiled at 100 °C for various lengths of time as indicated below the gel. All samples were blotted with an anti-eNOS antibody. Blots are representative of at least three experiments. An arrow indicates a unique 100-kDa band. In B, COS-7 cells were transfected with WT eNOS or E298D cDNA. Following transfection, cells were pulsed with [35S]methionine/cysteine for 1 h and chased with unlabeled media at time points ranging from 0 to 72 h. Total eNOS was immunoprecipitated using eNOS monoclonal antibody. Labeled eNOS was assayed by densitometry, and the t1/2 was calculated from the regression line. The data are representative of two experiments.

Having established acid hydrolysis as a likely mechanism of cleavage of E298D eNOS, we investigated whether acidic conditions alone, without boiling, could account for fragmentation of the enzyme. To separate the heating of samples from the accompanying acidification, we switched to cell lysis solutions buffered by citrate-phosphate mixtures. The citrate-phosphate lysis solutions were much more resistant to acidification upon heating than Tris-based buffers (e.g. a pH 7.0 solution of citrate-phosphate buffer at 22 °C remained at pH 7.0 when temperature was raised to 100 °C, whereas Tris buffers commonly dropped 1-2 pH units upon heating to 100 °C). Experiments in total cell lysates were performed to test whether fragmentation of E298D could occur upon chronic exposure to acidic conditions. Cells were transfected with appropriate cDNAs and lysates processed and further incubated in various pH solutions while rotating, at 37 °C for 10 h. As seen in Fig. 3A, fragmentation of both E298D and WT eNOS occurs markedly at pH 3.0. The fragmentation pattern of E298D in pH 3.0 includes a unique 100-kDa band (to the right of the asterisk) just below a larger, more prominent band that is also seen in the WT eNOS, pH 3.0 lane (lanes 3 and 6). At pH 5.0, the larger, prominent band seen at pH 3.0 is not present. With a darker exposure, a unique band present in the E298D, the pH 3.0 lane, becomes apparent at pH 5.0 (to the left of the asterisk). The unique 100-kDa band in E298D is consistent in size with the fragment of interest seen in Figs. 1 and 2. These experiments provide evidence that only upon chronic exposure to nonphysiologic pH ranges (10 h at less than pH 5.0) will E298D be partially cleaved. Heating the enzyme to levels beyond 37 °C without substantial acidification does not cause significant cleavage (i.e. see Fig. 2A, lanes 1 and 2, where the samples are heated to 70 °C), thus suggesting that both a change in pH and temperature (acidic hydrolysis) were responsible for the cleavage. However, to test whether various manipulations to promote cellular stress could evoke the cleavage of eNOS, transfected COS cells were exposed to a variety of stimuli and samples were processed in LDS buffer. As seen in Fig. 3B exposure of cells to hypoxia (48 h, 1% ambient oxygen), H2O2 to evoke oxidative stress or staurosporine, a known inducer of apoptosis (20), did not result in the formation of the 100-kDa eNOS fragment under these extreme conditions.


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Failure of acidic pH and metabolic stresses to induce cleavage of E298D eNOS. A, transfected COS-7 cells expressing E298D or WT eNOS were lysed in citrate-phosphate buffers of pH 3.0, 5.0, or 7.0. Lysates were rotated at 37 °C for 10 h and then equilibrated to pH 7.4, and samples were prepared using the LDS sample buffer. Blots have been intentionally overexposed to show the developing degradation bands in WT versus E298D eNOS. The asterisk indicates the unique 100-kDa band in E298D eNOS lanes at low pH, and an arrow denotes a common degradation band in both E298D and WT eNOS. In B, duplicate samples from transfected COS-7 cells (E298D or WT eNOS (WT)) were subjected to hypoxia (48 h post-transfection in 1% O2 incubators), hydrogen peroxide (5 mM, 30 min), and staurosporine (1 µM, 6 h). Blots are representative of at least three experiments.

Collectively, the above data suggest that the cleavage of the E298D eNOS to the 100-kDa species may be artifactually generated in vitro. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that in the uncleaved state, E298D eNOS may have properties and activities different from wild-type eNOS that may account for higher cardiac disease risk in carriers of the 894T allele. Thus, COS cells were transfected with WT and E298D eNOS cDNA and the amount of NO produced over a 16-h period was quantified using NO-specific chemiluminescence. As shown in Fig. 4, A and B, the production of NO<UP><SUB>2</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> and the levels of eNOS protein expression in these experiments were not different from cells expressing the two forms eNOS. Next, we cloned both WT and E298D eNOS cDNAs into a bacterial expression vectors and produced and purified the recombinant proteins. As seen in Fig. 5A, both proteins were more than 85% pure based on Coomassie staining. Direct analysis of the catalytic activity of recombinant WT or E298D eNOS using hemoglobin capture of NO as an assay to assess the rate of NO production or cytochrome c reduction as an assay to assess the ability of the eNOS reductase domain to transfer electrons to an artificial acceptor showed that these proteins were indistinguishable enzymatically (see Fig. 5B). To confirm that cleavage of E298D is a product of sample preparation rather than proteolytically cleaved intracellularly, we prepared purified recombinant enzymes for Western blotting using NUPAGE (LDS buffers) or Laemmli-style methods to prepare samples. Fig. 5C demonstrates that recombinant E298D is cleaved in a fashion similar to that from eukaryotic cell lysates prepared similarly.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Both WT and E298D eNOS produce NO to the same extent. A, COS-7 cells were transfected with eNOS cDNAs (WT or E298D), and 48 h post-transfection, the release of nitric oxide, quantified as NO<UP><SUB>2</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>, over 48 h was measured via NO-specific chemiluminescence. B, representative Western blot of eNOS levels from NO release experiments documenting equal levels of expression of the two proteins. Data are presented as the mean ± S.E., with n = 21-23 individual transfectants.


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Enzyme activity and cleavage of recombinantly expressed WT and E298D eNOS proteins. A, representative Coomassie Blue-stained SDS gel of recombinant WT or E298D eNOS, purified from E. coli. B, comparison of catalytic activities of WT and E298D eNOS as determined by hemoglobin capture and cytochrome c reduction, respectively. In C, recombinant WT or E298D was prepared for Western analysis using either LDS or Laemmli sample buffer. The results shown in B are the mean ± S.E. of triplicate observations.

Here we show that the extensively documented E298D polymorphism in eNOS does not appear to influence the stability, half-life, or biologic activity of the enzyme isolated from cells or the enzymatic activity of the recombinant protein. Most importantly, isolation of samples in standard Laemmli buffer for SDS-PAGE will generate a 100-kDa fragment cleaved precisely at the Asp-Pro bond, suggesting that the presence of the 100-kDa fragment in human tissue from carriers of the E298D polymorphism is likely to arise because of sample preparation. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that this fragment can be generated in an in vivo context by an unknown proteolytic mechanism. In preliminary studies, we generated a 100-kDa protein corresponding to the fragment derived from the cleavage of E298D (Figs. 1 and 2) and expressed it as a recombinant protein in E. coli. Functional analysis of this protein missing the heme domain showed that it was an active reductase (based on cytochrome c reduction). If this cleavage can occur in a cellular context, it is possible for this protein to reduce oxygen to superoxide, which can contribute to endothelial dysfunction. Alternatively, because eNOS is subjected to various levels of regulation including protein-protein interactions, fatty acylation, and phosphorylation, these control steps may be influenced by the polymorphism. In conclusion, a causative linkage between the common polymorphism E298D in eNOS and the incidence of cardiovascular disease cannot be explained based on the cleavage or impaired function of the enzyme.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Dr. Gabriel Haddad for the use of hypoxic incubators.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (RO1 HL57665, RO1 HL61371, and RO1 HL64793 to W. C. S.; T32HL10183 to D. F.) and a grant-in-aid from the American Heart Association (national grant to W. C. S.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger A Howard Hughes Medical Institute Medical Student Research Training Fellow.

§ In receipt of a fellowship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

An Established Investigator of the American Heart Association. To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 203-737-2291; Fax: 203-737-2290; E-mail: william.sessa@yale.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 30, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M103647200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: NO, nitric oxide; eNOS, endothelial nitric-oxide synthase; WT, wild type; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; LDS, lithium dodecyl sulfate.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Rudic, R. D., Shesely, E. G., Maeda, N., Smithies, O., Segal, S. S., and Sessa, W. C. (1998) J. Clin. Invest. 101, 731-736[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Murohara, T., Asahara, T., Silver, M., Bauters, C., Masuda, H., Kalka, C., Kearney, M., Chen, D., Symes, J. F., Fishman, M. C., Huang, P. L., and Isner, J. M. (1998) J. Clin. Invest. 101, 2567-2578[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Moroi, M., Zhang, L., Yasuda, T., Virmani, R., Gold, H. K., Fishman, M. C., and Huang, P. L. (1998) J. Clin. Invest. 101, 1225-1232[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Forstermann, U., Pollock, J. S., Schmidt, H. H., Heller, M., and Murad, F. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 1788-1792[Abstract]
5. Rudic, R. D., and Sessa, W. C. (1999) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 64, 673-677[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Marsden, P. A., Heng, H. H., Scherer, S. W., Stewart, R. J., Hall, A. V., Shi, X. M., Tsui, L. C., and Schappert, K. T. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 17478-17488[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Wang, X. L., and Wang, J. (2000) Mol. Genet. Metab. 70, 241-251[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Nakayama, M., Yasue, H., Yoshimura, M., Shimasaki, Y., Ogawa, H., Kugiyama, K., Mizuno, Y., Harada, E., Nakamura, S., Ito, T., Saito, Y., Miyamoto, Y., Ogawa, Y., and Nakao, K. (2000) Am. J. Cardiol. 86, 628-634[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Zanchi, A., Moczulski, D. K., Hanna, L. S., Wantman, M., Warram, J. H., and Krolewski, A. S. (2000) Kidney Int. 57, 405-413[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Hingorani, A. D., Liang, C. F., Fatibene, J., Lyon, A., Monteith, S., Parsons, A., Haydock, S., Hopper, R. V., Stephens, N. G., O'Shaughnessy, K. M., and Brown, M. J. (1999) Circulation 100, 1515-1520[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Miyamoto, Y., Saito, Y., Kajiyama, N., Yoshimura, M., Shimasaki, Y., Nakayama, M., Kamitani, S., Harada, M., Ishikawa, M., Kuwahara, K., Ogawa, E., Hamanaka, I., Takahashi, N., Kaneshige, T., Teraoka, H., Akamizu, T., Azuma, N., Yoshimasa, Y., Yoshimasa, T., Itoh, H., Masuda, I., Yasue, H., and Nakao, K. (1998) Hypertension 32, 3-8[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Hibi, K., Ishigami, T., Tamura, K., Mizushima, S., Nyui, N., Fujita, T., Ochiai, H., Kosuge, M., Watanabe, Y., Yoshii, Y., Kihara, M., Kimura, K., Ishii, M., and Umemura, S. (1998) Hypertension 32, 521-526[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Lacolley, P., Gautier, S., Poirier, O., Pannier, B., Cambien, F., and Benetos, A. (1998) J. Hypertens. 16, 31-35[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. MacLeod, M. J., Dahiyat, M. T., Cumming, A., Meiklejohn, D., Shaw, D., and St. Clair, D. (1999) Neurology 53, 418-420[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Kato, N., Sugiyama, T., Morita, H., Nabika, T., Kurihara, H., Yamori, Y., and Yazaki, Y. (1999) Hypertension 33, 933-936[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Raman, C. S., Li, H., Martasek, P., Kral, V., Masters, B. S., and Poulos, T. L. (1998) Cell 95, 939-950[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Tesauro, M., Thompson, W. C., Rogliani, P., Qi, L., Chaudhary, P. P., and Moss, J. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 2832-2835[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Garcia-Cardena, G., Oh, P., Liu, J., Schnitzer, J. E., and Sessa, W. C. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 6448-6453[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Banasiak, K. J., and Haddad, G. G. (1998) Brain Res 797, 295-304[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Bertrand, R., Solary, E., O'Connor, P., Kohn, K. W., and Pommier, Y. (1994) Exp. Cell Res. 211, 314-321[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. McCabe, T. J., Fulton, D., Roman, L. J., and Sessa, W. C. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 6123-6128[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Martasek, P., Liu, Q., Liu, J., Roman, L. J., Gross, S. S., Sessa, W. C., and Masters, B. S. (1996) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 219, 359-365[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Deleted in proof
25. Fulton, D., Gratton, J. P., McCabe, T. J., Fontana, J., Fujio, Y., Walsh, K., Franke, T. F., Papapetropoulos, A., and Sessa, W. C. (1999) Nature 399, 597-601[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Liu, J., Garcia-Cardena, G., and Sessa, W. C. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 12333-12340[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Cai, H., Wilcken, D. E., and Wang, X. L. (1999) J. Mol. Med. 77, 511-514[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Piszkiewicz, D., Landon, M., and Smith, E. L. (1970) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 40, 1173-1178[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Rittenhouse, J., and Marcus, F. (1984) Anal. Biochem. 138, 442-448[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.