Crystal Structure of Red Sea Bream Transglutaminase*

Kazuyoshi NoguchiDagger , Kohki IshikawaDagger , Kei-ichi YokoyamaDagger , Tomoko Ohtsuka§, Noriki Nio§, and Ei-ichiro SuzukiDagger

From the Dagger  Central Research Laboratories and § Food Research & Development Laboratories, Ajinomoto Company Inc., 1-1 Suzuki-cho, Kawasaki-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 210-8681, Japan

Received for publication, October 29, 2000



    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The crystal structure of the tissue-type transglutaminase from red sea bream liver (fish-derived transglutaminase, FTG) has been determined at 2.5-Å resolution using the molecular replacement method, based on the crystal structure of human blood coagulation factor XIII, which is a transglutaminase zymogen. The model contains 666 residues of a total of 695 residues, 382 water molecules, and 1 sulfate ion. FTG consists of four domains, and its overall and active site structures are similar to those of human factor XIII. However, significant structural differences are observed in both the acyl donor and acyl acceptor binding sites, which account for the difference in substrate preferences. The active site of the enzyme is inaccessible to the solvent, because the catalytic Cys-272 hydrogen-bonds to Tyr-515, which is thought to be displaced upon acyl donor binding to FTG. It is postulated that the binding of an inappropriate substrate to FTG would lead to inactivation of the enzyme because of the formation of a new disulfide bridge between Cys-272 and the adjacent Cys-333 immediately after the displacement of Tyr-515. Considering the mutational studies previously reported on the tissue-type transglutaminases, we propose that Cys-333 and Tyr-515 are important in strictly controlling the enzymatic activity of FTG.



    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Transglutaminase (TGase1; protein-glutamine gamma -glutamyltransferase) catalyzes the Ca2+-dependent acyl transfer between the gamma -carboxyamide groups of glutamine residues within peptides and the primary amino groups of various amines. A glutamine residue serves as the acyl donor, and the most common acyl acceptors are the epsilon -amino groups of peptide-bound lysine residues or the primary amino groups of some naturally occurring polyamines, like putrescine or spermidine (1). When a protein-bound lysine residue acts as an acyl acceptor, intermolecular or intramolecular epsilon -(gamma -glutamyl)lysine bonds are formed, resulting in the polymerization of proteins (2-6). TGases are widely distributed in various organisms (7-18). Human blood coagulation factor XIII, which forms fibrin clots in hemostasis and wound healing by catalyzing the cross-linking between fibrin molecules, has been well characterized (19-28), and its crystal structure has been determined (22-24). However, the crystal structure is that of an inactive form, because the catalytic Cys is completely blocked. Human factor XIII is the enzyme that forms blood clots, and therefore its activation process is highly controlled so that its catalytic activity is not exhibited under normal conditions. It is assumed that the structural changes caused by substrate binding as well as the proteolysis of the N terminus by thrombin are necessary to activate human factor XIII (25, 26). Because the activation process is very complex, the structure-function relationship of human factor XIII remains unclear, even though the crystal structure has been reported. To investigate the structure-function relationships of the TGases, the crystal structures of other TGases will be very helpful. The red sea bream liver transglutaminase (fish-derived TGase, FTG) is a member of the tissue-type TGases (29). Although the biological function of FTG remains unknown, it plays an important role in gel formation in fish mince sols, by catalyzing a setting reaction that involves the cross-linking of myosin heavy chains in fish paste. Production and purification methods for recombinant FTG have already been established (29, 30), and the amino acid sequence identity between FTG and human factor XIII is ~33%. FTG has some advantages for studying the structure-function relationship because FTG works as a monomer, whereas human factor XIII works as a homodimer, and FTG does not require an initial proteolysis in its activation process. It is expected that the activation process of FTG is similar to, but simpler than, that of human factor XIII. We describe the crystal structure of FTG determined at 2.5-Å resolution and its potential substrate binding sites. We also propose a novel aspect of the activation process, which involves the regulation of the enzymatic activity by a Cys residue adjacent to the catalytic Cys.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Purification and Crystallization-- Production and purification of recombinant FTG were performed as previously reported (29, 30). Crystallization experiments were performed using the method of vapor diffusion in hanging drops. The crystallization solution in the reservoir had a volume of 500 ml and was composed of 0.8 M ammonium sulfate, 1% polyethylene glycol 6000, 0.1 M Hepes, pH 7.0, and 5 mM DTT. Two µl of FTG solution (14 mg/ml) and 2 µl of the reservoir solution were mixed and then equilibrated against the reservoir at 4 °C for 2-4 weeks before crystals appeared.

Data Collection and Processing-- X-ray diffraction data up to 2.5-Å resolution were collected on the beamline BL6B at Photon Factory (Tsukuba, Japan) using two differently aligned crystals. Because the crystals suffered from severe radiation damage at room temperature, they were flash-cooled at -173 °C after equilibration against a cryo-solvent containing 30% glycerol, 0.6 M ammonium sulfate, 8% polyethylene glycol 6000, 0.1 M Hepes, pH 7.0, and 5 mM DTT. The diffraction data were processed using DENZO and SCALEPACK (31). The crystals belong either to space group P6122 or P6522 with the following unit cell dimensions: a = b = 97.8 Å; c = 455.5 Å. A summary of the data collection is shown in Table I.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Summary of the X-ray diffraction data for FTG

Molecular Replacement-- The structure of FTG was solved by the molecular replacement method, based on the crystal structure of human factor XIII. The program AMORE (32) was used in the molecular replacement procedure using intensity data between 10.0 and 3.0 Å for the rotation search and between 10.0 and 4.5 Å for the translation search. There were single prominent solutions to both the rotation and translation searches. The solutions indicated that the correct space group is P6522 and that the asymmetric unit has one FTG molecule, giving a calculated value of ~70% for the solvent content. Rigid body refinement of the orientation and the position of the molecule resulted in a crystallographic R factor of 0.525 at 3.5-Å resolution, and the crystal packing was realistic.

Structure Refinement-- The side chains according to the FTG sequence were fitted into the initial 2Fo - Fc map, if their electron densities appeared clearly. Otherwise, nonconserved residues were changed to alanine. The model was refined and completed by rounds of model building using QUANTA97 and simulated annealing using X-PLOR (33). After the Rcryst dropped to 0.294, water molecules were added to the model. Finally, the Rcryst and the Rfree against 37,856 reflections between 8.0- and 2.5-Å resolution were decreased to 0.196 and 0.246, respectively. The electron densities of five residues at the N terminus, eleven residues at the C terminus, and residues 462-471 and 569-571 were not observed. The final model includes 666 amino acid residues of a total of 695 residues, 382 water molecules, and 1 sulfate ion derived from the ammonium sulfate used in the crystallization procedure. The refined structure has two nonproline cis peptide bonds (Lys-268-Tyr-269 and Lys-384-Tyr-385), as suggested by Weiss et al. (24). The root mean square deviations in bond length and bond angle are 0.017 Å and 3.454°, respectively. A Ramachandran plot analysis with PROCHECK (34) reveals 85.7% of residues in most favored regions, 12.6% of residues in additional allowed regions, 0.5% of residues in generously allowed regions, and 1.2% of residues in disallowed regions. This result seems quite reasonable for a 2.5-Å resolution model.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Overall Structure-- The overall structures of FTG and the human factor XIII monomer are shown in Fig. 1, and the Calpha trace of FTG is compared with that of the human factor XIII monomer in Fig. 2. The sequence alignment of FTG and human factor XIII, together with their secondary structural elements, is shown in Fig. 3. As shown in Fig. 1, the overall structures of FTG and human factor XIII resemble each other, although FTG lacks an activation peptide observed at the N terminus of human factor XIII. FTG, as well as human factor XIII, consists of four sequential domains named "beta -sandwich," "core," "barrel 1," and "barrel 2" by Yee et al. (22). In FTG, beta -sandwich contains residues Gly-6 through Phe-134, core contains residues Asn-135 through Thr-461, barrel 1 contains residues Arg-472 through Ser-583, and barrel 2 contains residues Thr-584 through Lys-684. The secondary structures of beta -sandwich, barrel 1, and barrel 2 are predominantly beta -sheets, whereas core consists of almost equal amounts of alpha -helices and beta -sheets (Fig. 3).



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Schematic ribbon drawings of FTG (left) and human factor XIII (right). Helices and sheets are colored red and blue, respectively. Both TGases consist of four domains: beta -sandwich, core, barrel 1, and barrel 2 from the N terminus. Human factor XIII has an activation peptide (green) at the N terminus. The active site in each TGase is marked with a yellow asterisk. This figure was produced using MOLSCRIPT (36).



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Structural comparison of FTG with human factor XIII. Stereoviews of the Calpha traces of FTG and human factor XIII are shown. The superposition was done using QUANTA97. FTG, human factor XIII, and the activation peptide are colored blue, red, and green, respectively. The active site in each TGase is marked with a white asterisk.



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Structure-based sequence alignment of FTG and human factor XIII (FXIII). The dashed lines represent incorporated gaps that bring the sequences into alignment. The asterisks represent identical matches. Residues constituting the catalytic triad are colored red. The red and blue bold lines represent alpha -helices and beta -strands, respectively. The boxes colored magenta, orange, green, and blue represent beta -sandwich, core, barrel 1, and barrel 2, respectively.

Three cysteine pairs are close enough to each other to form disulfide bridges. The distances between the beta -carbon atoms of the cysteine pairs are 5.04 Å for Cys-272 and Cys-333, 4.82 Å for Cys-188 and Cys-285, and 4.82 Å for Cys-523 and Cys-552. Because DTT was added in the crystallization process, the electron densities between their sulfur atoms were not observed. However, in the absence of DTT, disulfide bridges would be formed, except between Cys-272 and Cys-333. The disulfide bridge formation between the two cysteine residues would still be prevented by a hydrogen bond between Sgamma of Cys-272 and Oeta of Tyr-515. The special relationship between Cys-272 and Cys-333 will be discussed in a subsequent section ("Active Site Structure and Activation Process").

Domain Structure-- Both barrel 1 and barrel 2 consist of seven beta -strands (Fig. 3). The relative positions of these beta -strands in barrel 1 are quite similar to those in barrel 2 (Fig. 1).

The beta -sandwich domain consists of two four-stranded antiparallel sheets twisted about 50° with respect to each other. In addition, there is one alpha -helix in this domain. Although the topologies of the beta -sandwich domains of FTG and human factor XIII resemble each other, the relative positions of the two beta -sheets are somewhat different (Figs. 1 and 2).

The core domain, in which the active site is located, consists of 11 alpha -helices and 12 beta -strands. Most of the alpha -helices of the enzyme are located in this domain. As compared with human factor XIII, there are distinct differences in the alpha -helix-rich region near beta -sandwich and the region consisting of three beta -strands between the active site and barrel 1.

Structural Differences between FTG and Human Factor XIII-- As discussed in the previous section, there are some structural differences in the beta -sandwich and core domains between FTG and human factor XIII. Because human factor XIII actually works as a homodimer, the dimer structure is shown in Fig. 4. The region between the active site and barrel 1 is adjacent to beta -sandwich and the alpha -helix-rich region of the other half of the dimer; the activation peptide crosses the interface. This extensive region is thought to be an acyl acceptor binding site of human factor XIII (22).



View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Dimer structure of human factor XIII. Each domain is colored as follows: beta -sandwich, red; core, blue; barrel 1, yellow; barrel 2, orange; and the activation peptide, green. Possible acyl acceptor binding sites are marked by magenta circles. This figure was produced using MOLSCRIPT (36).

The postulated activation process of human factor XIII is as follows. First, the activation peptide is cleaved by thrombin in the presence of Ca2+, and then an acyl donor approaches the active site from the direction of the two barrel domains to form an acyl-enzyme transition state. Finally an acyl acceptor accesses the active site from the above-mentioned region to make an epsilon -(gamma -Glu)Lys bond. If this hypothesis is correct, the structurally different regions between the two TGases are concentrated on the acyl acceptor binding sites. It is tempting to postulate that human factor XIII forms a homodimer to accept only a small subset of proteins as acyl acceptors by increasing the surface area of its binding site.

On the other hand, there seem to be few structural differences in the acyl donor binding site in terms of the Calpha traces. However, if we take a closer look at the site, there are distinct differences in the surface structure and the charge distribution around the acyl donor binding sites between the two TGases (Fig. 5). In human factor XIII, the acyl donor binding site forms a deep and wide groove. On the other hand, the corresponding groove of FTG is shallow and narrow. In addition, there are some basic regions on the surface of the groove of FTG, whereas the groove of human factor XIII is scarcely charged. These structural and electrostatic differences in the substrate binding sites are plausible causes for the different substrate specificities of FTG and human factor XIII.



View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Molecular surfaces of FTG and human factor XIII. Acidic regions and basic regions are colored red and blue, respectively. The regions enclosed by yellow frames represent possible acyl donor binding sites (22). This figure was produced using GRASP (37).

Active Site Structure and Activation Process-- Fig. 6 shows a comparison of the active sites of FTG and human factor XIII. The catalytic triad reminiscent of the cysteine proteases consists of Cys-272, His-332, and Asp-355 in FTG and Cys-314, His-373, and Asp-396 in human factor XIII (Fig. 6). Because FTG and human factor XIII have similar active site structures and both require Ca2+ to exhibit their catalytic activity, their activation processes are thought to be similar. The catalytic Cys residue is situated between a Tyr residue (Tyr-515 in FTG and Tyr-560 in human factor XIII) and another Cys residue (Cys-333 in FTG and Cys-374 in human factor XIII). The Tyr belongs to barrel 1 and is located on the loop projecting over the core. It seems that Oeta of the Tyr and Sgamma of the catalytic Cys form a hydrogen bond, which suppresses the enzymatic activities of the TGases. Therefore, the Tyr must be removed to activate the enzymes.



View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Stereoviews of the active sites of FTG (A) and human factor XIII (B). Carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, and sulfur are colored black, red, blue, and yellow, respectively.

It has been reported that either the thrombin cleavage or the binding of one calcium ion alone does not cause the conformational changes of human factor XIII (23). At present, the activated structure of human factor XIII has not been elucidated, because substrate binding is probably required to cause the large conformational changes necessary for the enzymatic activity.

If the Tyr covering the catalytic Cys were simply removed, then it is predicted that the Cys would form a disulfide bridge with the adjacent Cys, and then the enzyme would lose the catalytic activity immediately. Therefore, we suppose that these two TGases cannot be activated in the absence of substrates. In other words, the formation of an acyl-enzyme intermediate is essential to prevent the formation of the disulfide bridge. There is good evidence to support this hypothesis; i.e. the catalytic activity of human factor XIII was reduced to 22% by the proteolysis of the linker peptide joining the core and barrel 1 domain (28), whereas TGase 3, in which the noncatalytic Cys in the active site is replaced with Val, was activated 15-fold by the same treatment (35). We can explain these phenomena by assuming that the catalytic Cys of human factor XIII formed a disulfide bridge with the neighboring Cys following the removal of the barrel domains containing the Tyr covering the catalytic Cys, whereas in the case of TGase 3, the catalytic Cys was exposed and became more reactive. The remaining activity (22%) of human factor XIII is accounted for by the presence of DTT in the activity measurement. Consequently, the activation processes of FTG and human factor XIII are considered to be as follows. 1) Ca2+ binds to its site in TGase. 2) An acyl donor is led to the active site. 3) The Tyr covering the catalytic Cys is removed by a conformational change caused by the acyl donor binding. 4) An acyl-enzyme intermediate is formed between the acyl donor and the catalytic Cys (in the case of human factor XIII, proteolysis of the activation peptide by thrombin is necessary between steps 1) and 2)). In this activation process, not only the Tyr covering the catalytic Cys, but also the other Cys near the catalytic Cys, is considered to play an important role in selecting only appropriate substrates.

Because human factor XIII is the enzyme that forms blood clots, it is assumed that its activation process is highly controlled to prevent its activity in the absence of specific substrates, such as fibrin. Although the physiological role of FTG remains to be determined, its activation process is also thought to be ingeniously controlled so that it is activated only under specific conditions. In future studies, the three-dimensional structure of an FTG-substrate complex should be determined to demonstrate the activation processes of TGases.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Masaru Tanokura for the use of a cryostat and Mamoru Suzuki for help with the initial attempts at data processing with DENZO.


    FOOTNOTES

* This study was supported in part by the Sakabe project of the Tsukuba Advanced Research Alliance.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The atomic coordinates and the structure factors (code 1G0D) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (http://www.rcsb.org/).

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-44-210-5832; E-mail: eiichiro_suzuki@ajinomoto.com.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, November 15, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M009862200


    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: TGase, transglutaminase; FTG, fish-derived TGase; DTT, dithiothreitol.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES


1. Aeschlimann, D., and Paulsson, M. (1994) Thromb. Haemostasis 71, 402-415[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Folk, J. E., and Finlayson, J. S. (1977) Adv. Protein Chem. 31, 1-133[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Folk, J. E. (1980) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 49, 517-531[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Lorand, L., and Conrad, S. M. (1984) Mol. Cell. Biochem. 58, 9-35[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Greenberg, C. S., Birckbichler, P. J., and Rice, R. H. (1991) FASEB J. 5, 3071-3077[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Folk, J. E., and Chung, S. I. (1985) Methods Enzymol. 113, 358-375[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Chung, S. I., and Folk, J. E. (1972) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 69, 303-307[Abstract]
8. Ho, K.-C., Quarmby, V. E., French, F. S., and Wilson, E. M. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 12660-12667[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Wong, W. S. D., Batt, C., and Kinsella, J. E. (1990) Int. J. Biochem. 22, 53-59[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Weraarchakul-Boonmark, N., Jeong, J.-M., Murthy, S. N. P., Engel, J. D., and Lorrand, L. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 9804-9808[Abstract]
11. Grant, F. J., Taylor, D. A., Sheppard, P. O., Mathewes, S. L., Lint, W., Vanaja, E., Bishop, P. D., and O'Hara, P. J. (1994) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 203, 1117-1123[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Myhrman, R., and Bruner-Lorand, J. (1970) Methods Enzymol. 19, 765-770
13. Tokunaga, F., Muta, T., Iwanaga, S., Ichinose, A., Davie, E. W., Kuma, K., and Mikata, T. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 262-268[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Singh, R. N., and Metha, K. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 225, 625-634[Abstract]
15. Klein, J. D., Guzman, E., and Kuehn, G. D. (1992) J. Bacteriol. 174, 2599-2605[Abstract]
16. Margosiak, S. A., Dharma, A., Bruce-Carver, M. R., Gonzales, A. P., Louie, D., and Kuehn, G. D. (1990) Plant Physiol. 92, 88-96
17. Ando, H., Adachi, M., Umeda, K., Matsuura, A., Nonaka, M., Uchio, R., Tanaka, H., and Motoki, M. (1989) Agric. Biol. Chem. 53, 2613-2617
18. Kanaji, T., Ozaki, H., Takao, T., Kawajiri, K., Ide, H., Motoki, M., and Simonishi, Y. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 11565-11572[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Shen, L., and Lorand, L. (1983) J. Clin. Invest. 71, 1336-1341[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Bruner-Lorand, J., Pilkington, T. R. E., and Lorand, L. (1966) Nature 210, 1273-1274[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Gladner, J. A., and Nossal, R. (1983) Thromb. Res. 30, 273-288[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Yee, V. C., Pedersen, L. C., Le Trong, I., Bishop, P. D., Stenkamp, R. E., and Teller, D. C. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 7296-7300[Abstract]
23. Yee, V. C., Pedersen, L. C., Bishop, P. D., Stenkamp, R. E., and Teller, D. C. (1995) Thromb. Res. 78, 389-397[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Weiss, M. S., Metzner, H. J., and Hilgenfeld, R. (1998) FEBS Lett. 423, 291-296[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Hornyak, T. J., Bishop, P. D., and Shafer, J. A. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 7326-7332[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Hornyak, T. J., and Shafer, J. A. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 6175-6182[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Bishop, P. D., Teller, D. C., Smith, R. A., Lasser, G. W., Gilbert, T., and Seale, R. L. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 1861-1869[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Greenberg, C. S., Enghild, J. J., Mary, A., Dobson, J. V., and Achyuthan, K. E. (1988) Biochem. J. 256, 1013-1019[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Yasueda, H., Kumazawa, Y., and Motoki, M. (1994) Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 58, 2041-2045[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Yasueda, H., Nakanishi, K., Kumazawa, Y., Nagase, K., Motoki, M., and Matsui, H. (1995) Eur. J. Biochem. 232, 411-419[Abstract]
31. Otwinowski, Z. (1993) in Data Collection and Processing: Proceedings of the CCP4 Study Weekend (Sawyer, L. , Isaacs, N. , and Bailey, S., eds) , pp. 55-62, SERC Daresbury Laboratory, Warrington, UK
32. Navaza, J. (1994) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 50, 157-163[CrossRef]
33. Brünger, A. T. (1987) Science 235, 458-460
34. Laskowski, R. A., MacArthur, M. W., Moss, D. S., and Thronton, J. M. (1993) J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26, 283-291[CrossRef]
35. Kim, I.-G., Gorman, J. J., Park, S.-C., Chung, S.-I., and Steinert, P. M. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 12682-12690[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Kraulis, P. J. (1993) J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26, 283-290[CrossRef]
37. Nicholls, A., Sharp, K. A., and Honig, B. (1991) Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 11, 281-293[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.