From the Department of Biochemistry, Molecular
Biology, and Biophysics and § Center for Metals in
Biocatalysis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 and
Department of Microbiology, and ** Center for Biocatalysis and
Bioprocessing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
Received for publication, August 25, 2000, and in revised form, October 29, 2000
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Naphthalene 1,2-dioxygenase (NDOS) is a
three-component enzyme that catalyzes
cis-(1R,2S)-dihydroxy-1,2-dihydronaphthalene formation from naphthalene, O2, and NADH. We have
determined the conditions for a single turnover of NDOS for the first
time and studied the regulation of catalysis. As isolated, the
Rieske nonheme iron dioxygenases catalyze a remarkable reaction in
which dioxygen is cleaved and both atoms are inserted across a double
bond of an unactivated aromatic nucleus to yield a
cis-dihydrodiol (1-4). These enzymes initiate the
biodegradation of some of the most recalcitrant aromatic compounds that
enter the environment from both natural and industrial sources, making
their study of great importance for progress in bioremediation
practices (5, 6). In addition, the inherent enantio- and
regiospecificity of these enzymes make them useful for synthetic
applications (7, 8). Several of these multicomponent dioxygenases are
known that differ in the number of components and the number and type of subunits in the oxygenase component that contains the active site.
However, all of the enzyme systems share the common features of a
reductase component that can accept and pass on two electrons from
reduced pyridine nucleotide, an electron transport system that may be
encompassed into the reductase, and an oxygenase that has both Rieske
[2Fe-2S] clusters and mononuclear iron centers.
One of the most thoroughly studied of the Rieske nonheme iron
dioxygenases is naphthalene 1,2-dioxygenase
(NDOS)1 isolated from
Pseudomonas sp. NCIB 9816-4, which catalyzes the reaction
shown in Scheme 1 to yield
(+)-cis-(1R,2S)-dihydroxy-1,2-dihydronaphthalene (9).
3
3 oxygenase component (NDO) has up to
three catalytic pairs of metal centers (one mononuclear
Fe2+ and one diferric Rieske iron-sulfur cluster). This
form of NDO is unreactive with O2. However, upon reduction
of the Rieske cluster and exposure to naphthalene and O2,
~0.85 cis-diol product per occupied mononuclear iron site
rapidly forms. Substrate binding is required for oxygen reactivity.
Stopped-flow and chemical quench analyses indicate that the rate
constant of the single turnover product-forming reaction significantly
exceeds the NDOS turnover number. UV-visible and electron paramagnetic
resonance spectroscopies show that during catalysis, one mononuclear
iron and one Rieske cluster are oxidized per product formed, satisfying
the two-electron reaction stoichiometry. The addition of oxidized or
reduced NDOS ferredoxin component (NDF) increases both the product
yield and rate of oxidation of formerly unreactive Rieske clusters. The results show that NDO alone catalyzes dioxygenase chemistry, whereas NDF appears to serve only an electron transport role, in this case
redistributing electrons to competent active sites.
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
View larger version (6K):
[in a new window]
Scheme 1.
The complete NDOS consists of three protein components: the 36-kDa
reductase protein (NDR) that contains a FAD molecule and a plant-type
[2Fe-2S] cluster, the 14-kDa ferredoxin electron transfer protein
(NDF) that contains a [2Fe-2S] Rieske cluster, and the 210-kDa
3
3 oxygenase component (NDO) that
contains the Rieske and mononuclear iron centers essential to catalysis.
Recently, the crystal structure of NDO was solved, representing the
first structure from this enzyme class (10). It showed that even though
both the Rieske and mononuclear iron centers are bound in the subunit, they reside in widely separated sites (44 Å). However, the
quaternary structure of the protein places each Rieske [2Fe-2S]
cluster within 12 Å of the mononuclear iron site in the adjacent
subunit. Experimental evidence suggests that it is these pairs of sites
that interact during catalysis via a conserved Asp residue that couples
the centers (10, 11). The crystal structure also showed that the
alternative NDO substrate indole binds near the mononuclear iron,
suggesting that this is the oxygen-activating site (12). In support of
this proposal, site-directed mutagenesis studies on NDO demonstrated
that substitution of the hydrophobic residues lining the substrate
binding pocket alter both the stereo- and regioselectivity of NDO (13).
Also, the ligands of the mononuclear iron are one solvent, two
histidines and one bidentate aspartic acid forming a 2-His
1-carboxylate "facial triad," as observed in many other
O2-activating iron-containing enzymes (14, 15). This
coordination potentially allows one or two exogenous ligands to bind.
Accordingly, it has been observed for the phthalate dioxygenase (PDOS)
that small molecules mimicking oxygen binding, such as
N3
, can bind to the mononuclear iron
and form binary enzyme-N3
and ternary
enzyme-substrate-N3
complexes (16,
17).
Taken together, the data provide a good structural model for how Rieske nonheme iron dioxygenases bind substrates in the oxygenase component. However, the chemistries of O2 activation and substrate hydroxylation are less well understood. Indeed, to date essentially all mechanistic hypotheses have been based on diagnostic chemistry rather than kinetic analysis or direct observation of intermediates with the consequence that no consensus mechanism has emerged. An essential step in the search for intermediates in the mechanism of cis-diol formation is to determine which protein components are essential for the reaction and what redox state of each of the enzyme cofactors yields a catalytically competent entity. Scheme 1 shows that the balanced chemical equation requires two electrons for substrate hydroxylation. However, little is known about where these electrons must reside at the onset of catalysis or the pathway of electron transfer during O2 activation. Previously, a mechanism was proposed whereby an essential complex forms between the phthalate dioxygenase reductase and oxygenase components during O2 binding/activation (18-20). The authors suggest that the electron transfer component is required for efficient catalysis as a direct source of electrons for oxygen activation and possibly as an effector to tune the structure of the oxygenase for catalysis. Similar roles for essential effector proteins have been proposed for several other oxygenases. For example, putidaredoxin in the P450cam system and component B in the MMO system are thought to assume essential roles as effectors during the catalytic cycle of these monooxygenases (21-24).
In the past, we have been able to resolve questions related to the
component and reactant requirements for efficient catalysis in systems
such as P450cam and MMO by studying single turnover reactions (21, 24, 25). Here we employ this strategy to determine the
requirements for protein component interactions and electron transfer
processes for catalysis by NDOS. By combining the techniques of product
analysis, transient kinetics, and spectroscopy, it is shown that
reduced NDO is capable of carrying out all aspects of the chemical
reaction catalyzed by NDOS without the other two components. Moreover,
the full rate of the reconstituted system is attained by NDO alone.
This work provides a new protocol for the study of this enzyme class as
well as insight into the intermediates of the catalytic sequence.
![]() |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Chemicals-- All chemicals were purchased from either Sigma, Aldrich, or Matheson and used without purification. (+)-cis-(1R,2S)-Dihydroxy-1,2-dihydronaphthalene (naphthalene cis-dihydrodiol) was prepared as described previously (26). Water was distilled and further purified using a Millipore reverse osmosis system.
Cell Growth and Protein Purification-- All experiments were performed using NDO purified from either Pseudomonas sp. NCIB 9816-4 or from Escherichia coli JM109(DE3)(pDTG141) that contains the cloned genes for NDOS (27). NCIB 9816-4 was grown on naphthalene (0.075 g/liter) in mineral salts base medium (28) as described previously (29) with the addition of 5 mM salicylate to yield ~600 g of wet cell paste from 240 liters of culture. Growth of E. coli and induction were performed as described previously (30). NDR and NDF were purified as described previously (31). NDO was purified from both NCIB 9816-4 and E. coli using the procedure described previously (32) with the omission of the final S-300 size exclusion column.
Enzyme Assays--
NDO activity was routinely assayed
polarographically at 23 °C by monitoring O2 consumption
with a Clark-type electrode as described previously (33). The standard
reaction mixture contained air-saturated 50 mM MES buffer,
pH 6.8, 50 mM NaCl, 300 µM NADH, and ~250
µM naphthalene. NDOS components were added to
concentrations of 0.1 and 1.0 µM for NDR and NDF,
respectively, whereas NDO was maintained below 50 nM.
Enzyme concentrations were routinely determined by UV absorption with
extinction coefficients we have determined from purified protein and
the Bradford assay (NDR 280 ~ 86.0 mM
1
cm
1; NDF
276 ~ 16.1 mM
1
cm
1; NDO
280 ~ 129 mM (
)
1
cm
1). Iron was added to the assay as
Fe(NH4)2(SO4)2·6H2O
to a final concentration of 100 µM where indicated. One
unit of NDO activity is defined as the amount of NDO required to
consume 1 µmol of O2 per min.
Iron Quantitation--
The concentration of iron in NDO samples
was determined either by the method of Fish (34) or by atomic
absorption spectroscopy using a Varian SpectAA 100 system. The
mononuclear iron occupancy was determined by subtracting the Rieske
iron content determined by EPR spectroscopy (each S = 1/2
spin = 2.0 Fe) from the total iron. For example, the enzyme used
for the experiments described in Table I contained 0.95 spin/mol and
2.7 Fe/mol to yield 0.8 mononuclear iron per . However, for NDO
preparations containing less than 1 Rieske cluster/
, it is likely
that some mononuclear iron occupies sites that do not contain intact
Rieske cluster.
Single Turnover Reactions-- Single turnover reactions were completed in either a quartz cuvette equipped with a mixing chamber and Teflon-sealed cap, a Teflon-sealed reaction vial, a stopped-flow instrument, or a septum-sealed EPR tube as appropriate. Enzyme component(s) were made anaerobic in 100 mM MES buffer, pH 6.8, in a septum-sealed vial and transferred to the appropriate reaction vessel with a gas-tight syringe. The reduction/oxidation states of the components were monitored using a Hewlett Packard 8453 diode-array spectrophotometer.
For product analysis, each reaction contained ~25 nmol of NDO active
sites () and/or ~25 nmol of NDF or NDR where indicated. The
reaction was initiated by the addition of an equal volume of buffer
saturated with naphthalene (~250 µM) and O2
(~1.4 mM). Each reaction was performed in a volume that
maintained the naphthalene/active site ratio at no less than 1 (typically 4). Reaction mixtures were incubated at 23 °C for the
times indicated. The reaction was quenched by transferring the mixture
to an Eppendorf tube, which was then heated by immersion in a 90 °C
water bath for 2 min. This method completely denatured the protein, as
judged by a complete loss of the characteristic red-brown color of the
enzyme(s) and total loss of activity. Control reactions using authentic naphthalene cis-dihydrodiol verified that no breakdown of
product occurs during heat quenching. Samples were vortexed briefly and frozen in liquid N2 before HPLC analysis.
For rapid chemical quench analysis of product formation, the enzyme solution was anaerobically transferred to one syringe of a chemical quench instrument (Update Instruments, Inc.), and the other syringe was loaded with O2- and naphthalene-saturated buffer. After rapid mixing, the solutions were passed through calibrated aging tubing and then sprayed into an equal volume of 6 N NaOH. The estimated dead time of the experiment was 10 ms. Loss of product under the chemical quench conditions was reduced by immediately neutralizing the solution by the addition of equal volumes of 3 N HCl and 0.5 M MES, pH 6.8. A small amount of product decay is seen during chemical quench experiments; therefore, the standard curve was generated using naphthalene cis-dihydrodiol treated in the same manner as the chemical quench of NDO turnover.
Reactions monitored by EPR spectroscopy were performed in sealed reaction vials. After initiation of the reaction, the mixture was rapidly transferred to an EPR tube and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Single turnover reactions performed for the determination of reoxidation rates were completed using an Applied Photophysics (model SX.18MV) stopped-flow instrument. The syringes were loaded with solutions as described above (with or without naphthalene), but the reaction was monitored with a diode array detector or a single wavelength detector at 464 nm. Diode array data was analyzed using Pro-K software supplied by Applied Photophysics, whereas single wavelength data was fit using the program KFIT supplied by Neil C. Millar (King's College London, UK).
Protein Reduction-- The reduction of protein components was completed by the addition of buffered sodium dithionite to the enzyme solution in the presence of methyl viologen (5 µM) until a slight residual color from reduced methyl viologen was observed. For reactions that used both oxidized and reduced components, the oxidized protein was loaded into the syringe containing O2 and naphthalene.
Product Analysis--
Before HPLC analysis, each sample was
centrifuged to pellet precipitated protein and filtered through a
0.2-µm Nylon syringe filter (Gelman). Chromatography was performed
using a Beckman Gold HPLC system. The sample was injected onto a
Beckman Ultrasphere ODS C18 reversed-phase column (4.6 mm × 25 cm) equilibrated in 20% methanol in H2O. Two min after
injection, a linear gradient of methanol (20-100%) was applied over
20 min. Absorption was monitored at 262 nm (naphthalene
cis-dihydrodiol product: 264 = 8.11 mM
1
cm
1). One product peak was identified as
naphthalene cis-dihydrodiol and quantified by comparison to
authentic standard.
EPR Spectroscopy-- X-band EPR spectra were collected on a Bruker E500 spectrometer equipped with an Oxford Instruments ESR-10 liquid helium cryostat. The nitrosyl complexes of NDO were prepared by briefly bubbling the enzyme solution with nitric oxide (NO) passed through 6 N NaOH. EPR spectra of spin S = 3/2, and spin 5/2 complexes were analyzed according to the following spin Hamiltonian equations, respectively.
![]() |
(Eq. 1) |
![]() |
(Eq. 2) |
where D and E/D are zero field-splitting parameters, and the
other parameters have their usual definitions. The term E/D is a
measure of the departure of the electronic environment of the iron from
axial symmetry. E/D values were determined for this study using the
software program RHOMBO, which was provided by Wilfred Hagen
(Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, The
Netherlands). Spin quantitation was completed as described by Aasa and
Vänngård (35) using 1 mM CuClO4, 1 mM Fe3+-EDTA, or 1 mM
Fe2+-EDTA-NO as standards (35). Spin quantitation of the
g = 4.3 species formed during single turnover was
performed by using the Fe3+-EDTA standard and collecting
both the experimental and standard spectra at 20 K. At this
temperature, for S = 5/2 species with E/D = 1/3 and 1<
D < 1, the middle Kramer's doublet (MS = ±3/2) is
approximately maximally occupied. Under these conditions, the g = 4.3 species represents ~1/3 of the total spins. D
for Fe3+-EDTA was taken as 0.83 cm
1 (36). Using the temperature dependence of
the g = 4.3 species of the NDO single turnover, we have
determined D to be 0.76 ± 0.02 cm
1.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
NDO Single Turnover--
As purified, resting NDO contains a
nearly fully occupied oxidized Rieske cluster and a partially occupied
reduced (Fe2+) mononuclear center (see below) in
each protomer. This form of the enzyme also has a small amount
of the naphthalene cis-dihydrodiol product (<6% of active
sites) associated with it (Table I). The concentration of product observed is within the error of the
measurement and does not change with incubation of the resting enzyme
with O2 and naphthalene for up to 1 h. Furthermore,
the addition of Fe2+ to this reaction mixture to increase
the population of the mononuclear iron site results in no increase in
the amount of product observed within experimental error. Thus, despite
having nearly fully occupied metal sites and high concentrations of the
two substrates naphthalene and O2, resting NDO does not
appear to catalyze substrate dioxygenation.
|
Treatment of NDO with a stoichiometric (1 electron per subunit)
amount of dithionite results in the one-electron reduction of the
Rieske cluster (see below). Because this form of NDO differs from resting NDO primarily by the reduction of the Rieske cluster, we
will refer to it as reduced NDO. Table I shows that the addition of
naphthalene and O2 to reduced NDO results in the formation of ~0.7 eq of the stereo- and regiochemically correct product per
active site at the conclusion of the reaction. We have found
that the method of analysis is important for these reactions. If the
product yield was assessed by ultrafiltration of the reaction mixture
rather than complete denaturation of the enzyme, more than 80% of the
product remained bound to the enzyme.
The addition of Fe2+ to the steady state reaction of NDO and other Rieske nonheme iron oxygenases increases activity (18, 37, 38). Likewise, the addition of 100 µM ferrous ion to the single turnover reaction increases the product yield, as shown in Table I, suggesting that some of the added iron is incorporated into unoccupied sites. These data indicate for the first time that NDO in which both the Rieske and mononuclear iron centers are reduced is capable of converting naphthalene to its cis-dihydrodiol in high yield in the absence of NDOS components NDF and NDR.
The addition of 1 eq of reduced NDF (one NDF/NDO ) to the single
turnover reaction increases the amount of product formed by 56% (Table
I), consistent with NDF transferring its electron to the active site of
the oxygenase. Since two electrons are required per product formed and
each reduced NDF carries one electron, a maximum increase of 50% would
be expected. However, ~30% of reduced NDO Rieske clusters have not
reacted to yield product after an initial single turnover (see Table I,
reduced NDO turnover). Thus, it appears that a portion of the electrons
in unreacted NDO Rieske clusters are used to form additional product.
Support for this conclusion is seen in the reaction of reduced NDO with oxidized NDF, naphthalene, and O2. As shown in Table I, the
addition of oxidized NDF increases the amount of product formed, yet
the yield does not exceed that expected based on the total number of
electrons initially present in the Rieske and mononuclear iron centers
of NDO, suggesting that the oxidized NDF facilitates the utilization of
these electrons. This can be explored more explicitly using
spectroscopic approaches as shown below. In contrast, it appears that
neither oxidized nor reduced NDR increases the yield of NDO turnover,
indicating that NDR is incapable of transferring electrons to NDO or
transferring electrons between oxygenase active sites in the absence of
NDF. This observation is consistent with the proposed role of NDF in
coupling electron transfer from NADH-reduced NDR to NDO (39, 40).
Neither reduced NDF nor reduced NDR alone catalyze
cis-dihydroxylation of naphthalene.
Spectroscopic Properties of NDO--
Fig.
1a shows the X-band EPR
spectrum of NDO as isolated from E. coli (NDOred
yield = 0.47).2 A small
resonance is seen at g = 4.3 that quantitates to less than 0.02 spin/. No other signal indicative of either high spin or low spin Fe3+ is seen in the spectrum, suggesting that
most of the mononuclear iron in resting NDO is in the Fe2+
state. Furthermore, no observation of an anisotropic signal with gav < 2 is observed, indicating that the
isolated NDO Rieske cluster is in the oxidized, diferric state.
|
Exposure of resting NDO to NO (Fig. 1a, inset)
generates a major S = 3/2 species (E/D = 0.025;
g = 4.18, 3.88, 2.01) and at least one other minor
S = 3/2 species (E/D = 0.106; g = 4.63, 3.37, 1.95). Integration of all S = 3/2 species yields ~0.4
spins/ for the particular sample used (NDOred
yield = 0.47). This type of EPR spectrum is known from our past studies to arise from nitrosyl adducts of mononuclear Fe2+
(41, 42). This approach has the advantages of making the normally EPR
silent Fe2+ mononuclear site accessible to a sensitive
spectroscopic technique that can differentiate between the types of
iron-containing centers in NDO and allows facile quantitation. The
substoichiometric S = 3/2 spin quantitation is consistent with the
observations that (i) NDO is typically isolated with fewer
than 3 Fe/
(2 Fe per Rieske center, 1 Fe mononuclear site), and
(ii) the specific activity increases with the addition of
Fe2+ to assays. However, the quantitation is slightly lower
than we would expect from the known iron content of the enzyme
preparations. This may be due to a low affinity of NDO for NO under
these conditions or to the binding of two NO molecules to a fraction of
the NDO mononuclear iron population. In any event, NDO as purified has at least one site available for small molecule binding, consistent with
the proposal that O2 binds at this site during catalysis.
The ability of the Fe2+ site in resting NDO to bind NO
suggests that it might also bind O2, resulting in oxidation
of the site. However, Fig. 1b shows that even after 1 h
of incubation of NDO with naphthalene and O2, there is only
a small increase in the g = 4.3 signal due to ferric
ion. Accordingly, Fig. 1b, inset, demonstrates that Fe2+ is still present because an
Fe2+-NO complex is readily formed (0.4 spins/;
E/D = 0.031; g = 4.21, 3.84, 2.01). The spectrum
in this case is slightly more rhombic and more homogeneous than the
spectrum of the NO complex of NDO as isolated, showing that small
changes have occurred in the environment of the iron. Similar results
are observed upon incubation of NDO in the absence of substrate with
O2 or NO (data not shown). The failure of the mononuclear
iron in these forms of NDO to react with O2 accounts for
the observed lack of single turnover catalysis in the absence of an
additional reducing equivalent.
Kinetics of the Single Turnover Reaction--
Fig.
2A, a shows the EPR
spectrum of reduced NDO (NDOred yield = 0.68) before
the single turnover reaction. One-electron reduction of the formerly
diferric Rieske cluster results in the antiferromagnetic coupling of
the S = 5/2 and S = 2 irons to yield the S = 1/2 system observed (gav = 1.89). Exposure of the reduced
enzyme to naphthalene and O2 (Fig. 2A,
b) oxidizes 63% of the Rieske cluster (~1 spin/product) within 20 s (the minimum time using this approach). Coincident with the "burst" of Rieske oxidation is the appearance of an
isotropic S = 5/2 species at g = 4.3, representing
the middle Kramer's doublet of mononuclear high spin Fe3+
in a rhombic electronic environment. We believe that this species results from ferric ion bound in the active site of NDO because the
line width from peak to trough is 17 gauss, considerably narrower than
observed for adventitiously bound ferric ion. Spin quantitation of this
species yields ~1 spin/product formed. Fig. 2B shows the time course of the remainder of the reaction in which further oxidation
of the mononuclear iron is not observed. As observed by EPR (and
optical absorption, see below), oxidation of the remainder of the
reduced Rieske cluster is much slower than the initial burst, requiring
more than 30 min to complete at
23 °C.3
|
Fig. 3A shows optical spectra
of NDO collected after rapidly mixing the reduced enzyme
(NDOred yield = 0.56) with naphthalene and
O2 at 23 °C in a stopped-flow device equipped with a
diode array detector. Consistent with the EPR data for this particular
sample, 57% of the Rieske cluster oxidizes (~1 mol/mol of product)
within 2 ms, whereas the remaining oxidation requires more than 30 min.
Observing the reaction at 464 nm (Fig. 3B) clearly shows the
jump in optical absorption, which is complete within 10 ms (a large
portion of the oxidation occurs within the 1.3-ms dead time of the
instrument, indicated by the dotted line), placing a lower
limit of 350 s1 on the rate of electron
transfer out of the Rieske cluster. Similar results have been observed
for three separate preparations of the enzyme.
|
Chemical quench of the single turnover reaction (NDOred
yield = 0.47; Fig. 3B, dashed line) shows
that the conversion of substrate to product occurs concurrently with
the fast phase of Rieske oxidation and formation of the
g = 4.3 Fe3+ species. No increase in
product formed occurs during the slow phase of Rieske cluster
oxidation. As shown in Fig. 3B, the NDO cis-diol
chemistry appears to be complete before 30 ms at 23 °C. This would
place a lower limit of ~120 s1 on the
product formation rate constant of NDO in the absence of the other NDOS
components. Comparison of this number with steady-state turnover
(kcat ~30 s
1
1), determined in our laboratory under
conditions of saturating substrates and protein components (1.1 and 26 µM for NDR and NDF, respectively) at the same pH and
temperature, indicates that the product formation rate is at least as
fast as the rate-limiting step of the reconstituted enzyme system.
NDO Autooxidation--
To determine if reduced NDO activates
O2 in the absence of naphthalene, we exposed the enzyme to
O2 and monitored the reaction by UV-visible and EPR
techniques. The reaction of reduced NDO (NDOred yield = 0.47) with O2-saturated buffer results in a very
different oxidation pattern than the single turnover of reduced NDO in
the presence of substrate. Under these conditions, only a slow
oxidation process is observed in the optical spectrum (Fig.
4A and inset). The
oxidation of the Rieske cluster can be fit by a sum of two exponential
phases (1/1 ~ 0.02 s
1,
1/
2 ~ 0.002 s
1), both of
which are much slower than the "burst" phase as observed in the
single turnover reaction. Fig. 4B shows EPR spectra of reduced NDO before (a) and after (b) mixing with
O2-saturated buffer. In agreement with the optical
absorption data, the EPR spectrum of the Rieske cluster slowly decays
as the center oxidizes, concurrent with the appearance of only a small
g = 4.3 signal (0.03 spins/
after 30 min),
indicating slight oxidation of mononuclear Fe2+ to
Fe3+. The observation that the single turnover and
autooxidation reactions display different oxidation kinetics strongly
implies that the processes occur independently and through different
mechanisms. Interestingly, Fig. 4B, c, shows that
reduced NDO fails to generate an EPR-observable nitrosyl adduct,
suggesting that NO cannot access the Fe2+, consistent with
the lack of O2-dependent oxidation of the
mononuclear iron.4
Apparently, reduction of both metal centers effectively blocks binding
of small molecules to the mononuclear iron center. In contrast,
exposing reduced NDO to NO in the presence of naphthalene (Fig.
4B, d) generates an S = 3/2 EPR spectrum
(0.5 spin/
; E/D = 0.032; g = 4.23, 3.78, 2.01), indicating that reduced NDO has an increased affinity for NO, or
NO has increased access to the mononuclear iron in the presence of
substrate. Note that all three nitrosyl complexes of NDO (resting,
NDO-substrate complex, and the reduced NDO-substrate complex) show
different E/D values, demonstrating that small electronic distortions
take place at the mononuclear site upon substrate binding and Rieske
reduction. Taken together, these data support the observation that both
naphthalene and O2 must be present for reduced NDO to
activate dioxygen for cis-dihydroxylation.
|
Analysis of Single Turnover in the Presence of NDF-- As shown in Table I, the addition of oxidized NDF to the single turnover reaction increased the product yield, even though more electrons were not added to the reaction. While performing these reactions, we noticed that the optical spectra showed that the normally slowly reacting fraction of the NDO Rieske clusters returned to the fully oxidized state much more rapidly (<10 s) than in reactions with reduced NDO alone (>30 min). Fig. 2A, c shows the EPR spectrum after the turnover reaction of reduced NDO (NDOred yield = 0.68) and oxidized NDF. In comparison to the single turnover reaction of NDO alone (see Fig. 2A, b), the completed reaction of NDO in the presence of oxidized NDF contains less oxidized mononuclear iron and a fully oxidized Rieske cluster. Furthermore, the decrease in the extent of oxidation of the mononuclear iron site is nearly matched by the increase in oxidation of the Rieske cluster, about 30%. This suggests one electron transfer from unreacted Rieske sites to mononuclear sites that have undergone reaction and, thus, are oxidized. This process of redistribution of the electrons in the system is apparently facilitated by the NDF component, presumably by accepting electrons from reduced Rieske clusters and shuttling them to other Rieske clusters that are coupled to the higher potential mononuclear iron centers, thereby reducing them. It seems likely that a Rieske cluster might initially be left in the reduced state during a single turnover reaction if its partner mononuclear site is vacant. On the other hand, oxidation of an occupied mononuclear site implies that the associated Rieske cluster is populated and reduced at the beginning of the reaction. Consequently, the only mononuclear sites that could accept a redistributed electron are those that are part of an inherently active pair. Thus, the NDF may occasionally shuttle an electron to a Rieske cluster associated with a newly reduced mononuclear center, allowing a second turnover and increasing the yield as observed.
Fig. 2A, d shows the EPR spectrum of the reaction
mixture of reduced NDO with O2 and naphthalene in the
presence of reduced NDF. At the conclusion of the reaction, all of the
mononuclear iron present was reduced, and all of the NDF was oxidized,
but a portion of the oxygenase Rieske cluster remained
reduced.5 These results can
be understood within the following context. Under the conditions
required for observation by EPR (high protein concentration), only
enough substrate for one turnover was present. Therefore, at the
conclusion of oxygenase turnover, ~0.7 Fe3+ and ~0.7
oxidized Rieske cluster are present (Fig. 2A, b),
which leaves ~1.3 electrons/ available for reduction of these
sites (1.0 from reduced NDF, 0.3 from the unreacted NDO Rieske
cluster). Reduction of 0.7 mononuclear sites leaves 0.6 electrons
stored in the NDO Rieske cluster. Under the conditions of this
experiment in which all the substrate has been utilized, NDO is trapped
in a state with fully reduced mononuclear iron and ~60% reduced
Rieske cluster, with NDF fully oxidized. This is in complete accord
with the proposals that rapid oxidation of the metal centers is
strictly correlated with substrate oxidation and that redistribution of electrons is greatly facilitated by NDF. Indeed, the apparent transfer
of electrons between sites occurs much faster than the oxidation of
unreacted Rieske cluster in NDO single turnover without NDF, suggesting
that NDF-facilitated electron transfer from one oxygenase Rieske
cluster to another is very rapid.
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
It has been shown here for the first time that the oxygenase component of a Rieske nonheme iron dioxygenase is capable of efficiently catalyzing the cis-dihydroxylation of an aromatic substrate in the absence of the other protein components of the enzyme system. The reaction catalyzed yields the correct product in a concentration that is approximately equal to that of the limiting mononuclear iron center and occurs with a rate constant that is at least as large as the turnover number for the reconstituted system. Importantly, it has been shown that both overall catalysis and rapid reaction with oxygen only occur when both the Rieske and mononuclear iron centers are reduced and organic substrate is present, suggesting a mechanism of regulation based within the oxygenase rather than externally through effector proteins. In accord with this proposal, the ferredoxin, which might potentially serve an effector role based on analogy with other oxygenase systems, appears to serve only an electron transfer role. Through comparison of product yields, the results presented here imply that single turnover reactions only occur if both of the metal centers of a catalytic pair (apparently involving sites across a subunit boundary) are occupied. Moreover, the effects of the other protein components of NDOS on product yield show that electron transfer between different catalytic pairs within a single NDO molecule occurs primarily externally via NDF rather than internally through the protein. These findings hold great significance for catalysis by Rieske nonheme iron oxygenases as discussed in the following sections.
Components Required for Turnover-- The observation that neither the reductase nor the ferredoxin component of NDOS is required for coupled and fast turnover shows that these components do not play direct roles in the activation of O2 or substrate hydroxylation. Rather, they participate in the fast reduction of the Rieske and mononuclear iron centers at the conclusion of one oxygenase catalytic cycle, regenerating a fully reduced oxygenase for another turnover. Our results differ from those previously reported for PDOS, where it was reported that only minor concentrations of product were formed during reactions of reduced oxygenase with phthalate and O2 (18). Furthermore, the authors noted that the reoxidation rate of the PDO Rieske cluster during this reaction was only a fraction of Vmax (>1000-fold slower), suggesting that PDR (reductase component of PDOS) (PDO has no ferredoxin component) was required for efficient turnover. Steady-state analysis of the PDOS reaction also supports the proposal that the reductase interacts with the oxygenase during turnover (19). Nevertheless, our data clearly show that nearly stoichiometric yields of product are formed in the NDO single turnover reaction in the absence of either the reductase or ferredoxin component, and this reaction is as fast as, and probably much faster than, Vmax under similar conditions. This apparent difference in reactivity between PDO and NDO in the absence of the other protein components may indicate that the enzymes use their components differently in the oxygen activation process. However, we have shown here that the naphthalene cis-dihydrodiol product binds tightly to the enzyme and could only be efficiently recovered after a single turnover by a chemical or thermal extraction procedure. In the PDO experiments, the analogous phthalate cis-diol product was instead separated from the reaction mixture by a filtration device. Therefore, the product may have been retained with the enzyme, leading to an underestimation of the yield.
Our results are consistent with NDF functioning to transfer electrons from NDR to NDO. However, a new role as an efficient redistributor of orphan electrons from inactive NDO subunits to active subunits has also emerged from these studies. It should be noted that although the work presented here eliminates NDF as an essential component for single turnover catalysis, it does not eliminate it from a possible role in product release to allow efficient multiple turnover. This possibility is currently being studied.
Small Molecule Interactions with the NDO Mononuclear Iron Center-- We have shown here that the resting NDO can bind the small O2 analog NO to the mononuclear Fe2+ under some conditions. Importantly, O2 does not appear to react with this site unless substrate is bound and the Rieske cluster is reduced. Similar five-coordinate metal centers are found in extradiol ring cleaving dioxygenases that bind NO but fail to bind O2 in the absence of substrate (47, 48). These enzymes direct the course of the reaction by binding their catecholic substrate directly to the iron, resulting in a decrease in redox potential and triggering oxygen binding to initiate catalysis (47, 49). Thus, the Fe2+ center is balanced by the endogenous ligand set at a potential between those required to bind NO and oxygen, respectively. The crystal structures of these and related enzymes show that the same 2-His, 1-carboxylate facial triad ligand set is employed in each case (14, 15). Consequently, it is not surprising that the similar site of NDO is tuned to react with oxygen in a controlled fashion through substrate interactions. The means by which it does this, however, is not obvious because it is not possible for the aromatic substrate of Rieske nonheme iron dioxygenases to coordinate directly to the metal center to alter the redox potential. It is possible that structural changes caused by reduction of the Rieske cluster in combination with substrate binding alter the environment of the mononuclear iron, allowing access to the required ligand site or causing a change in redox potential. We have detected such changes caused by substrate (and substrate analog) binding and Rieske cluster reduction for the oxygenase components of both naphthalene and benzoate dioxygenases using spectroscopic techniques (50). These data support our proposal that both the substrate and redox state of the Rieske cluster regulate NDO oxygen reactivity.
Comparison of Regulatory Mechanisms-- Oxygenases generally regulate oxygen activation to prevent the release of reactive oxygen species. Two quite different types of regulation within multicomponent oxygenase systems have been described in past studies, and these are typified by MMO and P450cam. In the case of MMO, the regulatory component B acts as an effector by forming a specific complex with the reduced hydroxylase component that gates oxygen addition to the enzyme (23, 24). This has the effect of greatly accelerating the reaction through the intermediates that could potentially release reactive oxygen species so that the activated intermediate, compound Q, could be efficiently formed and insert an oxygen atom into an unactivated substrate C-H bond, thereby assuring a coupled reaction. P450cam also catalyzes this type of reaction, but regulation occurs by two mechanisms that are each unrelated to the MMO regulatory mechanism (21, 22, 51). Both of the mechanisms regulate electron transfer rather than oxygen binding. In the first mechanism, substrate binding to the P450cam hydroxylase component increases the redox potential of the heme such that an electron can be accepted efficiently from putidaredoxin to initiate the catalytic cycle, thus assuring that substrate is present as catalysis begins. In the second mechanism, putidaredoxin acts as an effector by forming a highly specific complex with the hydroxylase component after O2 binds to the reduced heme. Efficient electron transfer of the second electron required for catalysis occurs in this complex, allowing the formation of the high valent oxy-complex of P450 that can react rapidly with substrate, again preventing uncoupling. A fundamental difference in the regulatory mechanisms of MMO and P450cam is that substrate plays no role in the former but a pivotal role in the latter.
Regulation in NDOS appears to represent a new class in which oxygen reactivity at one ferrous metal center is triggered by both substrate binding and reduction of a completely separate metal center within the oxygenase component. In contrast to the P450 system, this type of regulation does not involve the electron transfer components as effector proteins in a direct way, because the electrons that move the oxygenase component into a reactive state can be supplied by many types of donors. However, the new regulatory scheme does provide a mechanism by which the enzyme can avoid one-electron reduction of oxygen and uncoupled turnover in the absence of naphthalene, since two electrons and substrate must be available before oxygen can react rapidly with NDO. In this way, it is similar to the regulatory schemes for MMO and P450cam in that it moves the reaction rapidly through the steps where reactive oxygen species might be generated and released to participate in nonspecific chemistry. Like P450cam, NDO assures that substrate is bound to the enzyme before oxygen is activated. However, like MMO, it apparently accomplishes this by controlling access of oxygen to the reactive metal center rather than using the P450 mechanism of coupling reduction to substrate binding. The remarkable observation that the fully reduced NDO does not allow even the high affinity ligand NO to bind in the absence of substrate implies that O2 access is coupled specifically to substrate binding. Thus, the NDO substrate performs a role similar to that of component B in the MMO regulatory system. Indeed, both may function by inducing a conformational change at the metal center where oxygen is activated, which in the case of NDO is the oxygenase mononuclear iron site.
Mechanistic Implications--
The overall interplay of components
necessary for catalysis by NDOS is summarized in Scheme
2. Similar to previous proposals for
Rieske nonheme iron oxygenases (2, 52), we believe that reduced NDF
interacts with NDO to reduce both the Rieske and mononuclear iron
centers. At this point, the studies reported here indicate that the NDF
is no longer required. Fully reduced NDO may then bind naphthalene to
form the oxygen-reactive complex, although the order of reduction and
substrate binding has not been established. The reduced
enzyme-substrate complex is able to bind O2, reductively activate it by two electrons, and catalyze
cis-dihydroxylation. The cycle continues with product
dissociation and the re-reduction of the NDO cofactors by reduced
NDF.
|
Only a few proposals have been made for the chemical mechanism of
cis-diol formation at the mononuclear Fe2+ site
of Rieske nonheme iron dioxygenases, and these are based on very little
supporting experimental evidence. One early proposal whereby an
Fe3+-(hydro)peroxo species attacks the substrate
(illustrated in Scheme 3A)
derived from studies on putidamonooxin. Using uncoupling substrates, which caused the production of hydrogen peroxide, in combination with
solvent isotope effects, a ferric-peroxo intermediate was suggested as
the species responsible for the demethylation and dihydroxylation
reactions catalyzed by this enzyme (53-56). More recently, this
general mechanism has found support in the work of Lee (57), which
showed that benzene acts as both a substrate and an uncoupler of NDO,
generating H2O2 during the reaction. Further
evidence supporting the role of an Fe-(hydro)peroxo intermediate in NDO
turnover is found in the crystal structure of a putative indole-dioxygen adduct bound to the mononuclear iron (12). These observations suggest that the formation of an Fe-(hydro)peroxo complex
is at least an intermediate in the pathway of naphthalene cis-dihydrodiol formation. A second quite different proposal
(Scheme 3B) (58) is based on P450 chemistry, which invokes
O-O bond cleavage as part of the oxygen activation process and results in the formation of a high valent (formally Fe5+) iron-oxo
species to hydroxylate the substrate. We have proposed a similar
mechanism for MMO using a nonheme cofactor to generate an
electronically equivalent high valent species (24, 59, 60). The P450 or
MMO comparison is attractive in light of the variety of reactions NDO
catalyzes. In all cases tested, NDO catalyzes the same type of reaction
as P450 with one exception, epoxidation of the aromatic nucleus, in
which NDO forms arene cis-dihydrodiols from the same
substrates. A third hypothesis (Scheme 3C) is to utilize the
ferredoxin or reductase component to supply another electron after the
oxygen is bound so that a formal Fe4+ species is generated
(19). This would presumably facilitate the O-O bond cleavage, avoid the
unprecedented step of Fe5+ formation in a mononuclear
nonheme iron center, and return the mononuclear iron to the
Fe2+ resting state at the end of the reaction. However, a
significantly less oxidizing reagent would be generated in the active
site.
|
Chen and Que (61) recently prepared and characterized the first
iron-based functional models of Rieske nonheme iron dioxygenases. Two
ligand complexes have the ability to transform cyclooctene and
cis and trans isomers of hexene to the
corresponding cis-dihydrodiols. For one of the complexes, an
Fe3+(1-OOH) intermediate, has been observed,
suggesting its participation during catalysis (62, 63). Interestingly,
these complexes share a similar labile ligand orientation with that of
the mononuclear iron of NDO (64). The authors suggest that this
geometry allows for the formation of an
Fe3+(
2-OOH) intermediate that either
directly attacks the double bond or matures to the Fe5+ = O, which would then attack the substrate (Scheme 3, A and
B, respectively). Evidence supporting the formation of such
a high valent nonheme iron has recently been provided by Chen and Que (65).
The results of our work to do not clearly define a mechanism for
cis-diol formation; however, they strongly suggest that
Scheme 3C is unlikely for two reasons. Both the observation
that NDF is not required for a rapid single turnover and the fact that the reaction ends with the enzyme in the Fe3+ rather than
the Fe2+ oxidation state are inconsistent with Scheme
3C. Therefore, in agreement with the model chemistry, we
propose pathways 3A or 3B to be the catalytic
route to cis-diol formation. However, further dynamic and
spectroscopic studies are required to determine the exact nature of the
reactive species that is responsible for the unique
cis-dihydroxylation of unactivated aromatic compounds. We
believe that availability of a functional single turnover system will
allow direct kinetic approaches to be applied to this problem for the
first time.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
---|
We thank Dr. Rebecca E. Parales and Dr. Maja Ivokovic-Jensen for helpful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript.
![]() |
FOOTNOTES |
---|
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants GM24689 (to J. D. L.) and GM29909 (to D. T. G.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ Supported in part by National Institutes of Health Training Grant GM08277.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, 6-155 Jackson Hall, 321 Church St., University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455. Tel.:
612-625-6454; Fax: 612-625-2163; E-mail: lipsc001@tc.umn.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 30, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M007795200
2 Variability in single turnover product yield was observed for NDO preparations containing different amounts of mononuclear iron. Therefore, the yield of a single turnover of reduced NDO with naphthalene and O2 for each preparation used in a particular experiment is indicated as (NDOred yield).
3 Using UV-visible spectroscopy, attempts have been made to determine if the oxidation rate of the Rieske cluster during the slow phase is 2nd order with respect to NDO concentration. However, we could not discern any obvious change in reciprocal relaxation time with enzyme concentration.
4 The complex spectrum near g = 2 is believed to result from NO interacting with the Rieske cluster, based on our thorough studies of the interactions of NO with benzoate dioxygenase showing that enzyme devoid of mononuclear iron displays identical high field EPR spectra to those shown in Fig. 4B (c and d) (M. D. Wolfe, and J. D. Lipscomb, unpublished observations). The spectra were successfully simulated by summing spectra of reduced NDO, d7 nitrosyl, and d9 dinitrosyl iron complexes (not shown). The resulting gav ~ 2. 03 EPR spectra of the d7 and d9 complexes are commonly observed for metalloproteins exposed to NO and have been extensively reviewed in the literature (43-46).
5 The Rieske cluster in NDO can be resolved from the NDF Rieske cluster by the difference in the EPR spectrum of the reduced clusters.
![]() |
ABBREVIATIONS |
---|
The abbreviations used are: NDOS, naphthalene 1,2-dioxygenase system; MES, 2-[N-morpholino]ethanesulfonic acid; MMO, methane monooxygenase; NDO, oxygenase component of NDOS; NDF, ferredoxin component of NDOS; NDR, reductase component of NDOS; P450, cytochrome P450 monooxygenase; PDOS, phthalate dioxygenase system; PDO, oxygenase component of PDOS; EPR, electron paramagnetic resonance; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography.
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
1. | Gibson, D. T., and Parales, R. E. (2000) Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 11, 236-243[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
2. | Solomon, E. I., Brunold, T. C., Davis, M. I., Kemsley, J. N., Lee, S. K., Lehnert, N., Neese, F., Skulan, A. J., Yang, Y. S., and Zhou, J. (2000) Chem. Rev. 100, 235-349[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
3. | Butler, C. S., and Mason, J. R. (1997) Adv. Microb. Physiol. 38, 47-84[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
4. | Bertini, I., Cremonini, M. A., Ferretti, S., Lozzi, I., Luchinat, C., and Viezzoli, M. S. (1996) Coord. Chem. Rev. 151, 145-160[CrossRef] |
5. | Timmis, K. N., and Pieper, D. H. (1999) Trends Biotechnol. 17, 201-204 |
6. | Lau, P. C. K., and De Lorenzo, V. (1999) Environ. Sci. Technol. 33, 124A-128A |
7. | Hudlicky, T., Gonzalez, D., and Gibson, D. T. (1999) Aldrichimica Acta 32, 35-62 |
8. | Boyd, D. R., and Sheldrake, G. N. (1998) Nat. Prod. Rep. 15, 309-324 |
9. | Resnick, S. M., Lee, K., and Gibson, D. T. (1996) J. Ind. Microb. 17, 438-457 |
10. | Kauppi, B., Lee, K., Carredano, E., Parales, R. E., Gibson, D. T., Eklund, H., and Ramaswamy, S. (1998) Structure (Lond.) 6, 571-586[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
11. |
Parales, R. E.,
Parales, J. V.,
and Gibson, D. T.
(1999)
J. Bacteriol.
181,
1831-1837 |
12. | Carredano, E., Karlsson, A., Kauppi, B., Choudhury, D., Parales, R. E., Parales, J. V., Lee, K., Gibson, D. T., Eklund, H., and Ramaswamy, S. (2000) J. Mol. Biol. 296, 701-712[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
13. |
Parales, R. E.,
Lee, K.,
Resnick, S. M.,
Jiang, H. Y.,
Lessner, D. J.,
and Gibson, D. T.
(2000)
J. Bacteriol.
182,
1641-1649 |
14. | Hegg, E. L., and Que, L. (1997) Eur. J. Biochem. 250, 625-629[Abstract] |
15. | Que, L. (2000) Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 182-184[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
16. | Gassner, G. T., Ballou, D. P., Landrum, G. A., and Whittaker, J. W. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 4820-4825[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
17. | Pavel, E. G., Martins, L. J., Ellis, W. R., Jr., and Solomon, E. I. (1994) Chem. Biol. (Lond.) 1, 173-183[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
18. |
Batie, C. J.,
LaHaie, E.,
and Ballou, D. P.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
1510-1518 |
19. | Ballou, D., and Batie, C. (1988) Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 274, 211-226[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
20. | Batie, C. J., and Ballou, D. P. (1990) Methods Enzymol. 188, 61-70[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
21. | Tyson, C. A., Lipscomb, J. D., and Gunsalus, I. C. (1972) J. Biol. Chem. 247, 5777-5784 |
22. | Lipscomb, J. D., Sligar, S. G., Namtvedt, M. J., and Gunsalus, I. C. (1976) J. Biol. Chem. 251, 1116-1124 |
23. |
Liu, Y.,
Nesheim, J. C.,
Lee, S. K.,
and Lipscomb, J. D.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
24662-24665 |
24. | Wallar, B. J., and Lipscomb, J. D. (1996) Chem. Rev. 96, 2625-2657[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
25. |
Lee, S-K.,
Nesheim, J. C.,
and Lipscomb, J. D.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
21569-21577 |
26. | Jeffrey, A. M., Yeh, H. J., Jerina, D. M., Patel, T. R., Davey, J. F., and Gibson, D. T. (1975) Biochemistry 14, 575-584[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
27. | Suen, W. C. (1991) Gene Expression of Naphthalene Dioxygenase from Pseudomonas sp. NCIB 9816-4 in E. coli.Ph.D. thesis , University of Iowa |
28. | Cohen-Bazire, G., Sistrom, W. R., and Stanier, R. Y. (1957) J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 49, 25-68 |
29. | Ensley, B. D., Gibson, D. T., and Laborde, A. L. (1982) J. Bacteriol. 149, 948-954 |
30. | Lee, K., Resnick, S. M., and Gibson, D. T. (1997) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63, 2067-2070[Abstract] |
31. | Lee, K. (1995) Biochemical Studies on Toluene and Naphthalene Dioxygenases.Ph.D. thesis , University of Iowa |
32. | Lee, K., Kauppi, B., Parales, R. E., Gibson, D. T., and Ramaswamy, S. (1997) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 241, 553-557[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
33. | Whittaker, J. W., Orville, A. M., and Lipscomb, J. D. (1990) Methods Enzymol. 188, 82-88[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
34. | Fish, W. W. (1988) Methods Enzymol. 54, 357-364 |
35. | Aasa, R., and Vänngård, T. (1975) J. Magn. Reson. 19, 308-315 |
36. | Aasa, R. J. (1970) J. Chem. Phys. 52, 3919-3930[CrossRef] |
37. | Suen, W. C., and Gibson, D. T. (1993) J. Bacteriol. 175, 5877-5881[Abstract] |
38. | Bernhardt, F. H., and Meisch, H. U. (1980) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 93, 1247-1253[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
39. | Haigler, B. E., and Gibson, D. T. (1990) J. Bacteriol. 172, 465-468 |
40. | Haigler, B. E., and Gibson, D. T. (1990) J. Bacteriol. 172, 457-464 |
41. |
Arciero, D. M.,
Lipscomb, J. D.,
Huynh, B. H.,
Kent, T. A.,
and Munck, E.
(1983)
J. Biol. Chem.
258,
14981-14991 |
42. |
Chen, V. J.,
Orville, A. M.,
Harpel, M. R.,
Frolik, C. A.,
Surerus, K. K.,
Munck, E.,
and Lipscomb, J. D.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
21677-21681 |
43. | Henry, Y., Ducrocq, C., Drapier, J. C., Servent, D., Pellat, C., and Guissani, A. (1991) Eur. Biophys. J. 20, 1-15[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
44. | Lee, M., Arosio, P., Cozzi, A., and Chasteen, N. D. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 3679-3687[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
45. | Radi, R. (1996) Chem. Res. Toxicol. 9, 828-835[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
46. | Woolum, J. C., Tiezzi, E., and Commoner, B. (1968) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 160, 311-320[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
47. |
Arciero, D. M.,
Orville, A. M.,
and Lipscomb, J. D.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
14035-14044 |
48. | Lipscomb, J. D., and Orville, A. M. (1992) in Metal Ions in Biological Systems (Sigel, H., ed), Vol. 28 , pp. 243-298, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York |
49. | Shu, L., Chiou, Y. M., Orville, A. M., Miller, M. A., Lipscomb, J. D., and Que, L., Jr. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 6649-6659[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
50. | Wolfe, M. D., Parales, J. V., Lee, K., Gibson, D. T., and Lipscomb, J. D. (1999) J. Inorg. Biochem. 74, 339 |
51. | Sligar, S. G., and Gunsalus, I. C. (1976) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 73, 1078-1082 |
52. | Bill, E., Bernhardt, F. H., and Trautwein, A. X. (1981) Eur. J. Biochem. 121, 39-46[Abstract] |
53. | Bernhardt, F. H., Erdin, N., Staudinger, H., and Ullrich, V. (1973) Eur. J. Biochem. 35, 126-134 |
54. | Bernhardt, F. H., and Ruf, H. H. (1975) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 3, 878-881 |
55. | Bernhardt, F. H., and Kuthan, H. (1981) Eur. J. Biochem. 120, 547-555[Abstract] |
56. | Wende, P., Bernhardt, F. H., and Pfleger, K. (1989) Eur. J. Biochem. 181, 189-197[Abstract] |
57. |
Lee, K.
(1999)
J. Bacteriol.
181,
2719-2725 |
58. | Que, L., and Ho, R. Y. N. (1996) Chem. Rev. 96, 2607-2624[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
59. | Fox, B. G., Borneman, J. G., Wackett, L. P., and Lipscomb, J. D. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 6419-6427[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
60. |
Shu, L.,
Nesheim, J. C.,
Kauffmann, K.,
Munck, E.,
Lipscomb, J. D.,
and Que, L., Jr.
(1997)
Science
275,
515-518 |
61. | Chen, K., and Que, L. (1999) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 38, 2227-2229[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
62. | Kim, C., Chen, K., Kim, J. H., and Que, L. (1997) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 5964-5965[CrossRef] |
63. | Ho, R. Y. N., Roelfes, G., Hermant, R., Hage, R., Feringa, B. L., and Que, L. (1999) Chem. Commun. 21, 2161-2162[CrossRef] |
64. | Zang, Y., Kim, J., Dong, Y., Wilkinson, E. C., Appelman, E. H., and Que, L., Jr. (1997) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 4197-4205[CrossRef] |
65. | Chen, K., and Que, L. (1999) Chem. Commun. 15, 1375-1376[CrossRef] |