Identification and Characterization of a Low Oxygen Response Element Involved in the Hypoxic Induction of a Family of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genes

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE CONSERVATION OF OXYGEN SENSING IN EUKARYOTES*

Michael J. VasconcellesDagger §, Yide JiangDagger §, Kevin McDaidDagger , Laura GiloolyDagger , Sharon WretzelDagger , David L. PorterDagger ||, Charles E. Martin**, and Mark A. GoldbergDagger DaggerDagger

From the Dagger  Hematology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 and ** The Nelson Biological Laboratory, Bureau of Biological Research, Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Busch Campus, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854

Received for publication, October 18, 2000, and in revised form, January 17, 2001




    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

An organism's ability to respond to changes in oxygen tension depends in large part on alterations in gene expression. The oxygen sensing and signaling mechanisms in eukaryotic cells are not fully understood. To further define these processes, we have studied the Delta 9 fatty acid desaturase gene OLE1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We have confirmed previous data showing that the expression of OLE1 mRNA is increased in hypoxia and in the presence of certain transition metals. OLE1 expression was also increased in the presence of the iron chelator 1,10-phenanthroline. A 142-base pair (bp) region 3' to the previously identified fatty acid response element was identified as critical for the induction of OLE1 in response to these stimuli using OLE1 promoter-lacZ reporter constructs. Electromobility shift assays confirmed the presence of an inducible band shift in response to hypoxia and cobalt. Mutational analysis defined the nonameric sequence ACTCAACAA as necessary for transactivation. A 20-base pair oligonucleotide containing this nonamer confers up-regulation by hypoxia and inhibition by unsaturated fatty acids when placed upstream of a heterologous promoter in a lacZ reporter construct. Additional yeast genes were identified which respond to hypoxia and cobalt in a manner similar to OLE1. A number of mammalian genes are also up-regulated by hypoxia, cobalt, nickel, and iron chelators. Hence, the identification of a family of yeast genes regulated in a similar manner has implications for understanding oxygen sensing and signaling in eukaryotes.




    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Regardless of an organism's complexity, its ability to adapt to changes in environmental oxygen tension is critical to its survival. In many circumstances, the adaptive response to low oxygen tension requires alterations in the expression of specific genes. In mammals, genes encoding proteins such as erythropoietin and vascular endothelial growth factor, critical molecules in system-wide functions such as erythropoiesis and blood vessel formation, respectively, were among the first shown to be regulated by hypoxia (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). The regulation of these genes by hypoxia has served as a paradigm for the subsequent identification of hypoxia-regulated genes involved in basic intracellular metabolic and biochemical pathways. For example, the hypoxia responsiveness of genes involved in sugar transport (e.g. GLUT1 and GLUT3) and energy production (e.g. genes encoding certain glycolytic enzymes) is mediated by hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1),1 the same transcription factor that plays a critical role in erythropoietin and vascular endothelial growth factor activation in response to low oxygen tension (3, 4). HIF-1 is a heterodimeric protein comprised of an alpha  and beta  subunit, both of which are basic helix-loop-helix proteins in the PAS family of transcription factors. The previously identified beta  subunit is ARNT, the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator. ARNT mRNA and protein levels are not significantly affected by ambient oxygen tension. In contrast, although HIF-1alpha mRNA levels are not appreciably affected by oxygen tension, HIF-1alpha protein is only minimally present in normoxia, being rapidly degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in this condition. However, HIF-1alpha accumulates in response to hypoxia, certain transition metals (e.g. cobalt and nickel), and iron chelators such as desferrioxamine. Once the heterodimer is formed under these conditions, it can interact with other DNA-binding proteins (such as HNF4) which function in part to provide tissue and developmental specificity (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). HIF-1 has also been shown to associate with scaffold proteins such as p300/CBP (5), which have been shown to interact with the basal transcription machinery (6, 7). The interactions between the proteins in this complex have been the focus of several investigators, and have been reviewed previously (reviewed in Ref. 2).

Although a substantial understanding of the structure and function of HIF-1alpha exists, the mechanism by which mammalian cells sense hypoxia remains poorly defined. In certain prokaryotes, a heme protein has been shown to serve as an oxygen sensor (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 8). Evidence supports the role for a heme protein in mammalian oxygen sensing as well (9). Certain transition metals such as cobalt and nickel appear to mimic hypoxia and induce several hypoxia-regulated genes. It has been proposed that these metals may replace iron in the heme moiety of such a protein, thereby altering its conformation to a "deoxy" state (9). Alternatively, these transition metals may disrupt the production of reactive oxygen species which may serve as important signaling molecules in the oxygen response pathway (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 10). A recent study provided evidence against metal substitution in heme (11).

Iron chelation also mimics hypoxia. Just as certain metals may interfere with intracellular Fenton chemistry in some manner, decreased intracellular iron might also decrease reactive oxygen species within the cell, leading to altered gene expression (reviewed in Ref. 2). HIF-1alpha has been shown to be sensitive to these perturbations in intracellular oxygen-free radicals (12). Finally, carbon monoxide inhibits the expression of hypoxia-induced genes and HIF-1alpha activation. Carbon monoxide can bind reversibly to heme proteins, and may lead to a change in conformation to the "oxy" state (12). A novel human cytosolic flavohemoprotein with cytochrome b5 and b5 reductase domains and functional NAD(P)H oxidoreductase activity has recently been cloned (13). This protein fulfills all of the criteria for an oxygen sensor, although definitive data in this regard remains lacking.

The yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a single-celled eukaryote, is a facultative anaerobe which respires in the presence of oxygen but ferments under anaerobic conditions. Therefore, it is not surprising that yeast have evolved sophisticated molecular mechanisms involving oxygen-dependent gene regulation. Several yeast genes, exemplified by ANB1, have been shown to be up-regulated by complete anaerobiosis, mediated in large part through the ROX1p protein, a DNA-binding protein which functions as a repressor (reviewed in Ref. 14). There is no evidence that any factor that mimics hypoxia in mammalian cell lines induces ANB1 expression in yeast.2 However, recently it has been shown that other genes in S. cerevisiae exhibit increased expression above baseline at low oxygen tensions, before complete anaerobic conditions are reached (15). One gene in particular, OLE1, encodes the Delta 9 fatty acid desaturase and is critical for unsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis. Incubation in the presence of cobalt or nickel leads to increased expression of OLE1, mimicking mammalian hypoxia-regulated genes (15). In this study, we have further defined the regulation of OLE1 by hypoxia, certain transition metals, and iron chelation. The cis element responsible for hypoxia induction of OLE1 expression was identified and characterized using reporter gene studies and electromobility shift assays. This low oxygen response element, or LORE, was used to search the S. cerevisiae genome. This search led to the identification of a family of yeast genes regulated in a similar manner. Taken together, the evidence presented supports the hypothesis that critical aspects of the oxygen sensing mechanism are highly conserved among all eukaryotes.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Media, Chemicals, and Enzymes-- Yeast strains were grown in YPD medium (Bio 101, Inc., Carlsload, CA) or SC dropout medium, depending on the plasmid selectable markers. LB was used for bacteria growth purposes. Ampicillin (U.S. Biochemical Corp.) was used as necessary at 50 µg/ml unless indicated otherwise. o-Nitrophenyl-beta -galactopyranoside was obtained from ICN Biochemicals Inc. or Sigma. Radiolabeled compounds were purchased from PerkinElmer Life Sciences. Formamide, dextran sulfate, and Denhardt's solution were bought from American Bioanalytical. Acrylamide, bisacrylamide, TEMED, and protein molecular mass markers were from Bio-Rad. Ammonium sulfate, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, CoCl2, NiCl2, 1,10-phenanthroline, and Nonidet P-40 were obtained from Sigma. SeaKem ME-agarose was from FMC Bioproducts. T4 polynucleotide kinase and dNTPs were purchased from Promega Corp. Shrimp alkaline phosphatase and Taq polymerase were purchased from Roche Molecular Biochemicals; other restriction enzymes were from New England BioLabs. All enzymes were used according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Oligonucleotide Synthesis-- Oligonucleotides were synthesized by Integrated DNA Inc. When necessary restriction sites for cloning were added at the 5' ends of primers and were preceded by 3 to 6 nucleotides for efficient digestion. Paired oligonucleotides used for direct cloning possess a phosphate group at the 5' end. Table I shows the nucleotide sequences used for polymerase chain reaction (PCR), Northern blot assay, EMSA, cloning, and site-directed mutagenesis.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Oligonucleotides used in this study

Plasmid and Plasmid Construction-- Plasmids used in this study are shown in Table II. The construction of several of the OLE1 promoter-lacZ fusion deletion series was described previously (16). Construction of pAM6, pAM7, pAM10, and pAM16 vectors containing the OLE1 LORE sequences (-347 to -328 relative to the ATG translational start codon with the A of the codon designated as +1) was performed by inserting the synthetic paired oligonucleotides (10-5' and 10-3') into the XhoI restriction site of pTBA30, the CYC1 basal promoter-lacZ fusion vector obtained from Dr. A. Vershon. pAM16 contains one LORE copy in the -347 to -328 forward or (+) orientation 5' to the basal CYC1 promoter-lacZ fusion. pAM7 has one LORE copy in the -328 to -347 reverse or (-)-orientation. pAM6 contains a tandem repeat of the LORE in the (+)-orientation. pAM10 was generated by inserting the synthetic paired oligonucleotides (yd-19 and yd-20) into the XhoI restriction site of pTBA30. The LORE in this plasmid has three mutations. Plasmid pAM4 is the p62::934 derivative with three nucleotide substitutions in the LORE region (-C342T, -T341A, and -A339G) prepared utilizing three-step PCR with oligonucleotides containing site-directed mutations. Two PCR reactions with appropriate pairs of mutant primers (PCR1: yd-8 and yd-20 and PCR2: yd-19 and lacZ-3') and Taq DNA polymerase were carried out as recommended by Roche Molecular Biochemicals in 100-µl reactions, using 1 ng of p62::934 as a template in a PTC-100 thermal cycler (MJ Research, Inc., Watertown, MA) for 30 cycles (1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at 55 °C, and 1 min at 72 °C), followed by 7 min at 72 °C. The PCR products were purified from a 1.0% agarose gel by using a Qiaex DNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA). Then, PCR products 1 and 2 were annealed, and amplified as above with primer yd-8 and lacZ-3'. The resulting PCR products were purified as above and digested with restriction enzyme HindIII and SalI. Finally this PCR product was cloned into HindIII and SalI pretreated p62::934 plasmid to generate pAM4. All the constructs were verified by DNA sequencing. The promoter deletion constructs were transformed into wild-type strain RZ53-6 for subsequent beta -galactosidase assays.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Yeast (S. cerevisiae) strains and plasmids

Strains and Growth Conditions-- Table II contains the yeast strains used in these studies. Yeast cells containing lacZ fusion plasmids were grown at 30 °C on uracil dropout medium containing dextrose (17). For unsaturated fatty acid repression analysis, yeast were grown in medium supplemented with 1% Tergitol as described previously (16). Cells were grown in the presence of UFAs for 6 h prior to the beta -galactosidase assays. Plasmid amplifications and bacterial transformations were performed using Escherichia coli strain DH5 (Invitrogene Corp.). Yeast transformations were performed by the method of Elble (18). Preparative cultures were grown aerobically in a shaker at 200 rpm (Innova 4000 incubator shaker, New Brunswick Scientific) at 30 °C to mid-logarithmic phase. For experiments assessing yeast under hypoxic conditions, mid-logarithmic phase preparative cultures were used to inoculate special air-tight flasks with inlet and outlet ports to allow for equilibration with the appropriate gas mixtures. Cultures were exposed to a continuous flow of hydrated medical grade nitrogen (BOC Gases, Murray Hill, NJ), unless otherwise specified, for 6 h after inoculating the medium via the inlet port. Of note, medical grade nitrogen is contaminated with trace amounts of O2 (less than 1%). The percentage of saturated O2 in each flask was confirmed by using an oxygen monitor (G. C. Industries, Inc.) attached to the outlet port of each culture. For experiments assessing yeast exposed to cobalt, cobalt chloride was added to the cultures at a concentration of 400 µM unless otherwise noted. Cells were exposed to cobalt for a period of 6 h prior to harvesting. The flasks contained a volume of medium that was ~1/5 the flask volume. All experiments were performed with yeast in logarithmic growth phase in a shaker (200 rpm) at 30 °C. Growth was monitored by measuring the yeast A600 at the completion of each experiment.

beta -Galactosidase Assays-- Assays of cells containing plasmids derived from the OLE1 promoter-lacZ fusion p62 constructs were performed as described previously (19). Cell densities for these assays were determined by measurement at A600. Transformants were assayed for each of the plasmid constructs listed in Table II. beta -Galactosidase activities reported here are the results of at least two independent experiments. Each experimental assay was performed in quadruplicate.

DNA Sequencing-- Plasmid templates for sequencing were isolated using a QIAprep spin purification kit (Qiagen). The fmol DNA sequencing system (Promega Corp.) was used for sequencing according to its technical manual. Reactions were run on 6% sequencing gels, which were dried and exposed to X-Omat AR film (Kodak) to visualize the sequence.

Yeast Extract Preparation-- Haploid yeast (S. cerevisiae, strain RZ53-6) were cultured in 1-liter flasks containing 200 ml of YPD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% dextrose) either under normoxic or hypoxic conditions, harvested at midlog phase (A600 = 0.8), and lysed by vortexing with glass beads according to published protocols (20). Following addition of ammonium sulfate to 40% and incubation on a rocker table at 4 °C for 30 min, the precipitate was collected by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm in a microcentrifuge at 4 °C for 10 min. The pellet was resuspended in storage buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 8.0, 5 mM EDTA, 20% (v/v) glycerol, mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 7 mM beta -mercaptoethanol) and stored frozen at -80 °C. The soluble protein concentration was determined using a Bradford dye binding assay (Bio-Rad).

EMSA-- EMSA were performed essentially as described by Carey (21) utilizing synthetic paired oligonucleotides (e.g. 10-5' and 10-3') as a probe or a probe containing the LORE sequence made by PCR using p62::934 as the template with 32P-labeled oligonucleotides 1-5' and yd-10 (-397 to -234) as the primers. Synthetic paired oligonucleotides were end labeled using polynucleotide kinase and purified using a Sephadex G-25 spin column (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) to remove unincorporated nucleotide. Probes made by PCR were purified away from labeled primers, [gamma -32P]ATP and Taq polymerase using a QIAquick spin PCR purification kit (Qiagen). The concentration of each probe was determined on an ethidium bromide-stained agarose-mini gel (22). In each reaction 10-20 ng of probe was used. Binding reactions were 40 µl of buffer H (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, at room temperature, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 50 mM NaCl, 7% glycerol, 1% Nonidet P-40, 15 ng/µl poly(dA-dT)) for 20 min at room temperature. Proteins were diluted into binding buffer on ice immediately before use. Reactions were loaded on 5% acrylamide gels (29:1), 0.5 × TBE, and run for 3 h at 4 °C at 15 V/cm. Gels were dried and exposed to X-Omat AR film (Kodak) to visualize the shifted bands.

RNA Isolation and Northern Blot Analysis-- Total yeast RNA was isolated as described previously (23). Equal amounts (15 µg) of total RNA were analyzed by Northern blots according to standard procedures for separation of RNA using 1% formaldehyde gels (15). RNA from the gels was transferred to Nytran Plus membranes (Schleicher & Schuell Inc.) in 10 × SSC overnight. Prehybridization, hybridization, and washing of membranes were performed as described (24). Northern blots were quantified using a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics) and autoradiographs were also prepared on X-Omat AR film (Kodak).

To make radiolabeled cDNA probes for other genes of interest (including ACT1 as a control), yeast genomic DNA prepared by the rapid isolation of yeast chromosomal DNA protocol (25) was subjected to PCR with appropriate pairs of primers for the particular genes of interest. The PCR products were first purified using a QIAquick spin PCR purification kit (Qiagen), separated by agarose gel electrophoresis in 1 × TAE, then purified by the Qiagen gel extraction kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's recommendations.

For the detection of OLE1 mRNA, a radiolabeled DNA probe was made using a 0.5-kilobase EcoRI fragment from the OLE1 protein coding sequence. For an internal control of cellular mRNA levels, a 1-kilobase HindIII-KpnI fragment of the S. cerevisiae phosphoglycerate kinase gene (PGK1) was isolated from plasmid pRIP1PGK obtained from Dr. S. Peltz (Robert Wood Johnson Medical School). All DNA fragments were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis in 1 × TAE and purified using the Qiagen gel extraction kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The purified DNA fragments were labeled to high specific activity with [32P]dCTP (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) by the random primer extension method using Ready to Go DNA labeling beads (Amersham Pharmaceutical Biotech) reaction kit. Unincorporated nucleotides were removed from the sample using a Sephadex G-50 spin column (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Specific activity of labeled probes was determined by liquid scintillation counting.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Hypoxia, the Transition Metals Cobalt and Nickel, and the Iron Chelator 1,10-phenanthroline Increase OLE1 Expression by Northern Analysis and beta -Galactosidase Reporter Assay-- Previous studies have shown that OLE1 mRNA transcript levels are increased at low oxygen (O2) tensions, below 0.5 µmol. Maximal expression, approaching a 4-fold increase over baseline normoxia, was observed following 8-10 h of anoxia (15, 26). First, we confirmed that OLE1 mRNA is maximally expressed in the presence of trace O2 (<1%) concentrations (data not shown). Subsequently, we extended this finding utilizing a plasmid (p62::934) in which 934 bp of the OLE1 promoter is fused in-frame with the lacZ gene. Less than a 2-fold induction over baseline levels in normoxia was observed in 1% O2 although a 6-fold induction occurred at an extremely low O2 tension (data not shown). In a similar fashion, we have verified previous studies demonstrating increased levels of OLE1 mRNA following incubation of S. cerevisiae with increasing concentrations of cobalt chloride (CoCl2) and nickel chloride (NiCl2) in normoxia (15) (data not shown). The concentrations were similar to those used in the study of hypoxia-regulated mammalian genes such as erythropoietin (9). These data were confirmed with experiments utilizing the OLE1 promoter-lacZ reporter assay. The degree of induction approached that which has been previously reported (15), even though the metal concentrations were almost 10-fold lower. At 800 µM CoCl2 and 450 µM NiCl2, significant differences in the growth rate of the yeast compared with control cultures were observed in our experiments, presumably due to direct toxicity of the culture by the metal on S. cerevisiae. It is not immediately apparent why the significantly lower metal concentrations used in the present studies appear to exert the same effect on OLE1 expression as the much higher concentrations employed in previous reports (15); differences in exposure time may be relevant.

Several mammalian hypoxia and transition metal-inducible genes are also up-regulated by the iron chelator, desferrioxamine (reviewed in Ref. 1). We, therefore, examined the effect of iron chelation on OLE1 expression. 1,10-Phenanthroline is an iron chelator that is routinely employed in studies with S. cerevisiae (27). Its affinity constant K for iron is 1021. As shown in Fig. 1, exposure to 1,10-phenanthroline for 6 h resulted in a dose-dependent increase in expression of OLE1, as assessed by Northern blot and OLE1 promoter-lacZ reporter data (data not shown). Cell growth was unaffected by any of the concentrations tested.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   OLE1 expression can be induced by 1,10-phenanthroline. A, Northern blot analysis under 1,10-phenanthroline (1,10-Ph)-treated conditions. Total RNA was extracted from yeast cells treated with increasing concentrations of 1,10-phenanthroline (4, 6, and 8 µg/ml) for 6 h. The RNA blot was first hybridized with a specific OLE1 probe, stripped, and rehybridized with a control PGK1 probe. N indicates normoxic conditions. In the diagram OLE1 and PGK1 indicate OLE1 and PGK1 mRNAs, respectively. B, quantitation of OLE1 mRNA of the Northern blot in A. Signal intensity was quantitated with a Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager. Transcript levels were normalized to the level of PGK1 mRNA and are presented as 1 relative units for the OLE1 mRNA extracted from the yeast cell grown without 1,10-phenanthroline.

OLE1 Promoter Deletion -lacZ Constructs Define a 142-bp Region (-255 to -396 Relative to the Transcription Start Site) Critical for Induction by Hypoxia and CoCl2-- A series of OLE1 promoter-lacZ fusion reporter constructs were transformed into the RZ53-6 strain and incubated in hypoxia, CoCl2, or 1,10-phenanthroline. The beta -galactosidase activities of these reporter constructs are shown in Fig. 2. The removal of bases -567 through -488 resulted in an 80-fold drop in enzyme activity under normoxia, suggesting the presence of an activating sequence in this region. Previous work has identified the fatty acid-regulated element in this region (16). In contrast, the deletion of sequences from -934 to -567 produced a small reduction in reporter gene expression under normoxia, hypoxia, and cobalt-treated conditions (within 2.7-fold). Deletions 3' to base -488 resulted in low basal reporter gene activities under normoxic conditions. However, removal of bases -488 through -396 did not dramatically affect the hypoxia- and cobalt-induced reporter gene expression. In contrast, the 142-bp region between -396 and -255 proved to be critical. Its removal essentially abolished the hypoxia induction and caused a significant reduction of CoCl2-induced reporter gene expression. The observation that the deletion of sequence between -567 and -488 also resulted in about a 2-fold reduction of CoCl2-induced reporter gene expression implies that additional regulatory elements necessary for complete CoCl2-induced OLE1 gene expression may reside in this region.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Deletions of the OLE1 promoter-lacZ fusion constructs and their activities in different conditions. Deletion constructs are shown on the left. The narrow line represents the OLE1 promoter sequence. The numbers above each narrow line indicate the position of the deletion end point with respect to the ATG start codon of the wild-type base sequence with the A of the codon designated as +1. The solid black bar represents the amino-terminal 27 amino acids of the OLE1 coding sequence fused to E. coli lacZ (open bar). The sequence shadowed vertically indicates the region important for hypoxia-induced gene expression. N, H, and CoCl2 to the right of the diagram represent the beta -galactosidase activities in normoxic, hypoxic, and cobalt-treated conditions, respectively. The beta -galactosidase activity of p62::934 in normoxia is designated as 100. Units of activity indicated are the average of at least three independent experiments that were performed in quadruplicate. Numbers in parentheses are the fold induction in either H or CoCl2 compared with N.

Hypoxia-induced Activation Complex Formation with LORE-- The analysis of the OLE1 promoter-lacZ fusion deletion series strongly suggests that the -255 to -396 region of the OLE1 promoter contains a cis element responsible for hypoxic induction. The possibility of an activation complex formed in hypoxic conditions was tested in EMSA using crude cell extracts from normoxia, hypoxia-, and cobalt-treated yeast. A wild type OLE1 promoter DNA fragment containing base pairs -234 to -396 was generated using PCR as a probe for the assay. Fig. 3 shows that two shifted bands (B1 and B3) were present in hypoxia and cobalt, although the CoCl2-treated extracts were of somewhat lower intensity. Band B2 was constitutive and could be displaced by nonspecific DNA (data not shown). To further define the DNA region responsible for the hypoxia-inducible complex formation, a series of double stranded nucleotides 20 base pairs in length covering the entire -255 to -396 region of OLE1 DNA were synthesized and used as cold competitors for the hypoxia-inducible shifted bands (B1 and B3) in EMSA. A double-stranded oligonucleotide 10-5'/10-3' (Table I, number 10) could effectively compete out the shifted bands as shown in Fig. 3, whereas the remainder of the double-stranded oligonucleotides from 1-5'/1-3' (number 1) to 14-5'/14-3' (number 14) could not. Fig. 3 is a representative gel containing paired oligonucleotides numbers 8, 9, 10, and 11. Therefore, oligonucleotide 10 appears to contain a site(s) for hypoxia- and CoCl2-induced protein(s) binding and was designated as the LORE.



View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   A representative EMSA gel for hypoxia-inducible complex formation in the OLE1 promoter. 10 µg of crude extract (CE) from normoxia (N)-, hypoxia (H)-, and cobalt (C)-treated yeast as described in the legend to Fig. 2 were incubated for 20 min at 25 °C with a 32P-labeled PCR fragment comprising the OLE1 promoter sequence from -396 to -234 and then subjected to electrophoresis at 4 °C for ~3 h. Free probe (F) and bound complexes (B1, B2, and B3) were detected by autoradiography. Lanes marked - indicate no CE or cold DNA competitor was added; + indicates CE added; P represents the DNA probe; the increased amount of cold competitor (10-, 20-, and 50-fold excess of the probe) is shown.

To further investigate the role of oligonucleotide number 10 in hypoxia- and CoCl2-induced complex formation, EMSAs were performed using end-labeled oligonucleotide number 10 as a probe. Fig. 4 demonstrates that crude extracts from both hypoxia- and cobalt-treated yeast form a specific complex with oligonucleotide number 10 in vitro. Of note, when this shorter radiolabeled probe is used, band B2 is prominent whereas B3 is no longer present. This is consistent with the hypothesis that B3 complex formation requires additional element(s) outside of oligonucleotide 10. Furthermore, when mutations were introduced in oligonucleotide 10 (m#10), the intensity of the nonspecific B2 was further enhanced. Shortened exposure time, however, confirmed that the specific hypoxia-induced B1 complex formation was not observed. No specific hypoxia- or CoCl2-induced complex formation was observed using probe number 8, confirming the previous EMSA competition assay.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Hypoxia inducible complex formation in -347 to -328 region of the OLE1 promoter. 10 µg of crude extract (CE) from normoxia (N)-, hypoxia (H)-, and cobalt (C)-treated yeast were incubated with 32P-end-labeled paired oligonucleotides #10, m#10, and #8, and subjected to electrophoresis as described in Fig. 3. Lanes marked - indicate no CE was added; + indicates CE added; P represents DNA probe.

LORE Is Required for Hypoxia-induced OLE1 Expression in Vivo-- A lacZ fusion reporter pAM4 was constructed such that the full-length OLE1 promoter possessed three mutations in the LORE region (-328 to -347). The requirement of an intact LORE for hypoxia-induced OLE1 expression was tested using the beta -galactosidase assay in yeast containing the pAM4 reporter. In this reporter assay, an 8-fold decrease in the basal level of expression in normoxia compared with the nonmutated LORE reporter was observed. The mutated LORE sequence eliminated the 6-fold hypoxic induction seen with the wild type reporter. This result is consistent with EMSA data, which reveal no hypoxia-induced band shift when the same mutated fragment was utilized as a probe (data not shown). However, the CoCl2-dependent induction by reporter assay was not affected (data not shown).

LORE Is Sufficient for Hypoxia-induced Gene Expression under the Control of a Heterologous Promoter-- The LORE was fused to the basal CYC1 promoter-lacZ fusion plasmid pTBA30. As shown in Fig. 5, pAM6, carrying two copies of the LORE in tandem, possesses robust transcriptional activation under both hypoxic and cobalt-treated conditions with about 44- and 10-fold increases, respectively. The plasmid carrying one copy of the LORE in both orientations also substantially stimulated the reporter gene expression under both hypoxic and cobalt-treated conditions. In contrast, the plasmid pAM10 containing the CYC1 heterologous promoter with three mutations in LORE did not show induction by either hypoxia or cobalt. Considerable variability in the basal expression of these constructs may be due to differences in sequences related to orientation and copy number of insert.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Expression of reporter activity from the heterologous pTBA vector containing the LORE. The diagram on the left indicates the LORE (vertical solid bar) inserted into the heterologous constructions employing the yeast CYC1::lacZ gene fusion plasmids. The small arrow in the vertical bar indicates the orientation of the inserted LORE. The horizontal blank and solid bars represent the CYC1::lacZ gene fusion. The diagram on the right indicates the normalized beta -galactosidase activity under normoxic (N)-, hypoxic (H)-, and cobalt (C)-treated conditions. The number in parentheses indicates the fold of induction relative to N. The actual beta -galactosidase units for normoxia samples are: pTBA30, 0.028; pAM6, 1.06; pAM10, 0.045; pAM16, 0.041; pAM7, 0.813, which are the average of two independent assays performed in quadruplicate.

LORE Is Involved in OLE1 Repression under Hypoxic Conditions by Unsaturated Fatty Acids (UFA)-- Previous experiments demonstrated FAR elements (-466 to -576) within the OLE1 promoter contribute to OLE1 repression by UFA in normoxic conditions (16). However, when an OLE1-lacZ fusion containing a deleted FAR element was tested under hypoxia, the transactivation repression by UFA was still observed (data not shown). That observation led us to examine whether the LORE plays a role in UFA induced OLE1 gene repression. Fig. 6A shows that the UFA linoleic acid can strongly repress normoxia-, hypoxia-, and cobalt-induced expression of the lacZ reporter plasmid pAM6 which contains two copies of the LORE in tandem. Inhibition showed a dose-response with an IC50 ~20 µM. Similar dose-response inhibition was obtained using the unsaturated fatty acids gamma -linolenic acid, oleic acid, and arachidonic acid but not with the saturated fatty acid steric acid (data not shown). Consistent with the beta -galactosidase assay, the OLE1 mRNA level was also dramatically repressed by linoleic acid as shown in Fig. 6B by Northern blot analysis. This repression in normoxia is consistent with previous studies (16). Again, UFA repression could not be overcome by incubation in hypoxic or cobalt-containing conditions. Crude extracts from linoleic acid-treated yeast were utilized for EMSA. As shown in Fig. 6C, the hypoxia-induced LORE complex formation was significantly suppressed with disappearance of binding complex B1. The intensity of the basal expression of the B1 complex under normoxic condition was also repressed, implying that LORE may be involved in the basal expression of OLE1 as well. The nonspecific band B2 was not affected.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   The effects of unsaturated fatty acid on OLE1 gene expression under hypoxic conditions. In all three panels, N, H, and C indicate yeast grown under normoxic-, hypoxic-, and cobalt-treated conditions as described under "Materials and Methods." E and EtOH represent the growth medium containing 1% ethanol; L.A. indicates the growth medium containing 1 mM linoleic acid dissolved in 1% ethanol. Panel A, histogram of beta -galactosidase activity of reporter pAM6 under varying conditions. The units of activity are the average of two independent assays. Panel B, Northern blot assay of OLE1 gene expression under varying conditions. ACT1 cDNA probe was prepared using PCR (see "Materials and Methods"). In the diagram OLE1 and ACT1 indicate OLE1 and ACT1 mRNAs, respectively. Panel C, EMSA for the crude extracts from yeast grown under different conditions. + indicates CE added; - indicates no CE or EtOH or linoleic acid added. P represents DNA probe. On the right side of this panel, B1 and B2 indicate the specific and nonspecific shifted bands, respectively; F represents the free probe.

Role of ROX1 in OLE1 Expression under Hypoxic Conditions-- ROX1 plays a significant role in the regulation of many anoxia-inducible yeast genes (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 14). Several studies have provided evidence that ROX1p functions as a repressor of anoxia-inducible gene expression under normoxic conditions (Ref. 28, reviewed in Refs. 29 and 30). Previous studies (28, 30, 31) had postulated that ROX1 may contribute to OLE1 induction under anoxic conditions based on predicted potential ROX1p-binding sites in the OLE1 promoter region. A ROX1 deletion mutant strain of RZ53-6 (RZ53-6 Delta rox1) was, therefore, utilized to investigate the ROX1 effects on OLE1 expression under hypoxic conditions. The results of in vivo beta -galactosidase assays of reporter p62::934 in strains RZ53-6 and RZ53-6 Delta rox1 show that the basal expression of the reporter gene under normoxic conditions is essentially the same in the ROX1 deletion strain as in its parental strain (data not shown). This suggests that ROX1 does not play a role as a repressor in the low basal level expression of OLE1 under normoxic conditions. Moreover, significant induction was still observed under hypoxic conditions (4.2-fold increase) and cobalt-treated conditions (5.1-fold increase) in the ROX1 deletion strain. In the Northern blot analysis the OLE1 mRNA level was induced in both strains under hypoxia- and cobalt-treated conditions. Consistent with the in vivo transactivation data, it was also shown that the relative mRNA levels of hypoxia- and cobalt-treated ROX1-deleted yeast were similar to that of wild-type. The basal OLE1 mRNA expression under normoxia was similar in both strains as well (data not shown). Another hypoxic gene ATF1 (see later "Results") showed similar results.

Sequence Specificity of the LORE Binding Activity-- To further define the sequence requirements in LORE, we made a series of single base pair substitutions in the site (Fig. 7A) and assayed the effects of the mutations on DNA binding in vitro (Fig. 8, A and B). Many of the mutant LOREs had altered DNA binding ability; in particular, those shown in Fig. 7B are representative of the observed range of EMSA responses. The effects on DNA binding varied from the absence of a detectable specific complex formation B1 for mutant C337A, to a reduction for mutant A346C, to about the same as the wild type LORE for mutant G347T, to an increase in DNA binding for mutant T331G. Another group of mutant LOREs (e.g. A336C and A335C) demonstrated altered complex formation with reduction of B1 but also creation of new shifted bands, suggesting that a new protein-DNA complex may have been created. The DNA binding ability of all the mutant LOREs is summarized in Fig. 8A. Substitutions that show large decreases in specific binding complex formation are concentrated in the center of the LORE. DNA binding was sensitive to single nucleotide substitutions examined between -343 and -335. We have, therefore, designated this nonameric sequence (ACTCAACAA) as the DNA-binding core of the LORE.



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   A, summary of the DNA binding ability of mutant LOREs. The first row shows the wild type (WT) LORE sequence. G347T to T328G are examples of single nucleotide mutations in the LORE at various positions. Values for DNA binding represent binding activities of the LORE-binding factor(s) to the various mutant sites. Values represent percentages relative to the wild type LORE in an EMSA, quantitated with a PhosphorImager; * indicates altered EMSA pattern. The nucleotides shadowed (vertically) indicate the positions important for hypoxia induced complex formation in vitro. B, representative EMSA gel for mutant LOREs altered in DNA binding. Increasing amounts of crude extract (5, 10, and 50 µg) (CE) from normoxic (N)- and hypoxic (H)-treated yeast were incubated for 20 min at 25 °C with a 32P-labeled wild type and mutant LOREs containing the OLE1 promoter sequence from -347 to -328. EMSA assays and autoradiography were performed as described in the legend to Fig. 3.



View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   A, representative genes containing potential LOREs in their promoter region. Names of genes are listed on the left. The core sequences are shadowed in the center of the sequence. B, a representative EMSA for potential LOREs. 10 µg of crude extract (CE) from normoxic (N)- and hypoxic (H)-treated yeast were incubated for 20 min at 25 °C with 32P-labeled wild type (OLE1) and potential LOREs from promoter of the genes indicated, then subjected to electrophoresis in the cold for ~3 h. Pairs of oligonucleotides for putative LORE sequences were used as indicated in A. The lane marked - indicate no CE was added; the increased amount of CE (5, 10, and 50 µg) was shown by the triangle. Free probe (F), specific bound complex B1, and nonspecific bound complex B2 were detected by autoradiography. C, Northern blot analysis of several hypoxia- and cobalt-inducible yeast genes. Certain genes containing a putative LORE in their promoter region were tested for hypoxia- and cobalt-induced gene expression by Northern blot analysis. Cells were grown to midlogarithmic phase and total RNA was extracted as described under "Materials and Methods." The RNA blot was first probed with one specific probe and then after the blot was stripped and reprobed with another. The SUT1, TRX2 cDNA probes were prepared using PCR (see "Materials and Methods"). In the figure OLE1, ATF1, TRX2, SUT1, ACT1, and PGK1 indicate OLE1, ATF1, TRX2, SUT1, ACT1, and PGK1 mRNAs, respectively. PhosphorImages of the resulting blots are shown in the figure.

Identification of a Family of Genes under Similar LORE Control-- A search of the S. cerevisiae genome for LORE core sequences present in the promoter regions of other genes was carried out using DNA Pattern (32) and PatMatch3 web-based tools. Fig. 8A illustrates alignment of putative LOREs in the promoter region of several genes. Some of the potential LOREs (from the promoter sequences of TRX2, FKH1, FTR1, RPL35A, and MET22) have exactly the same nine core nucleotides. The potential LOREs from the ATF1 and TIR1 promoter regions each have one nucleotide mismatch in the core region. Another potential LORE from SUT1 possesses two mismatches in this region. It is worth noting that the expression of ATF1, TIR1, and SUT1 is increased at low oxygen tensions (34-37). The hypoxia-induced complex formation of all potential LOREs from the listed genes was tested in vitro using EMSAs as shown in Fig. 8B. The results demonstrate that, like the wild type LORE from the OLE1 promoter, a clear hypoxia-induced complex is formed with the potential LOREs from the promoters of the genes indicated. The fact that potential LOREs from RPL35A, TRX2, and MET22 share the same core sequence but exhibit varied degrees of complex formation ability, based on the intensity of the B1 band shift in Fig. 8B, implies that the nucleotides outside the core also play an important role in DNA binding. On the other hand, the potential LOREs from ATF1, TIR1, FTR1, and SUT1 with one or two nucleotide mismatches still showed hypoxia-induced DNA binding (even increased DNA binding in the case of ATF1), suggesting that certain positions in the core sequence may be varied yet still function as a LORE in vitro.

To test the possibility that these genes may be hypoxia-inducible, Northern blot analyses of certain genes (ATF1, TRX2, SUT1, FTR1, and RPL35A) were performed as shown in Fig. 8C. Consistent with previous data (36), ATF1 expression was significantly induced under the hypoxic conditions employed. This study shows for the first time that ATF1 and TRX2 are induced by cobalt treatment as well, similar to OLE1. About a 3-fold hypoxia and 2.5-fold cobalt induction of TRX2 mRNA was observed. The hypoxia-induced SUT1 expression was confirmed; however, there was no significant induction by cobalt. FTR1 mRNA was also examined and it was confirmed that its level was decreased under hypoxic conditions, consistent with previous studies (data not shown) (38). The RPL35A mRNA level was not changed under hypoxic conditions (data not shown).

RAP1p and LORE-binding Protein(s) (LBP)-- RAP1p is a yeast multifunctional protein involved in transcriptional activation/repression, and telomere function (Ref. 39, reviewed in Refs. 40 and 41). Previous studies on the regulation of the ATF1 gene identified an 18-bp element essential for transcriptional activation in vivo (36). This element also contains a putative LORE. A purified glutathione S-transferase-RAP1p fusion was utilized for in vitro EMSA using a probe from the ATF1 promoter containing the 18-bp element. The results showed that RAP1p could form a complex with the ATF1 promoter DNA sequence. To test the possibility of RAP1p involvement in binding to the LORE, EMSAs were performed. The results demonstrate that the putative LORE from ATF1 forms a complex (B1) with the crude extracts from hypoxia-treated yeast cells analogous to the LORE from OLE1 (data not shown). On the other hand, a constitutive, strong binding band (B3) was observed using the RAP1p binding sequence from the PGK1 promoter as a probe. Additional EMSAs were performed using a very well characterized RAP1p binding sequence and mutants from the TPI promoter as probes (42). These results confirm that the B3 complex binds RAP1p (data not shown). A series of EMSAs were done to investigate the relationship between B3 and B1 (data not shown). Unlabeled LORE from either ATF1 or OLE1 could not compete out the B3 and vice versa, suggesting that the constitutive B3 complex involved with RAP1p binding is different from the hypoxia-induced B1 complex involving the LORE from ATF1 and OLE1. Unlabeled LORE of ATF1 could effectively compete out the complex formed with radiolabeled OLE1 LORE and vice versa (data not shown), which together with the previous B3 competition EMSA results suggest that the complex formed with the OLE1 LORE and the ATF1 LORE are similar. Because there is only 1-bp difference in the core region of the LORE between OLE1 and ATF1, a mutated LORE T341C from OLE1 which corresponds to the putative ATF1 LORE was examined. This single base change caused a constitutive complex formation in crude extracts from normoxia and hypoxia. The subsequent cold probe competition EMSAs suggested that that complex was the same as the B3 complex formed by the RAP1p binding sequence from PGK1 (data not shown). The B1 complex could still be observed using hypoxic crude extract, and could be displaced by unlabeled OLE1 LORE probe. In summary, these in vitro results support the hypothesis that the putative LORE of ATF1 functions like the LORE of OLE1 in the regulation of gene expression by hypoxia. Moreover, these data do not support a role for RAP1p binding to the LORE sequence during hypoxic induction.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

OLE1 encodes the Delta -9 fatty acid desaturase, an enzyme involved in the formation of unsaturated fatty acids. This enzyme introduces a double bond between carbons 9 and 10 of substrate palmitoyl (16:0) or stearoyl (18:0)-CoA with molecular O2 serving as an electron acceptor to form palmitoleic (16:1) or oleic (18:1) acid, respectively. Previous studies have demonstrated that OLE1 is up-regulated under hypoxic conditions. Its induction under hypoxic conditions may be in response to the limitation of O2 as a substrate.

The experiments presented in this paper have confirmed previous data showing that the expression of OLE1 mRNA is increased in hypoxia and in the presence of the transition metals cobalt and nickel under aerobic conditions (15). Data presented here have shown that these stimuli induce an OLE1 promoter-lacZ reporter gene as well. Aerobic incubation with the iron chelator 1,10-phenanthroline also leads to increased OLE1 expression as evidenced by Northern blot and reporter assays. Subsequently, using reporter gene assays and EMSAs, a LORE, which functions as a transcriptional activation cis element, was identified. The LORE, about 20 bp in length, is necessary and sufficient for OLE1 hypoxia-induced gene expression and is also sufficient for hypoxia-induced gene expression when placed upstream of a heterologous promoter. Further studies demonstrated that the same LORE sequence is involved in OLE1 repression by UFA in normoxic, hypoxic, and cobalt containing conditions. A family of genes containing a similar LORE in their promoter regions was identified by searching the S. cerevisiae genome using the 9-nucleotide DNA core binding sequence (ACTCAACAA), which was determined by performing EMSAs using a series of single nucleotide substitutions in the OLE1 LORE in vitro. Among them, ATF1, TRX2, SUT1, and TIR1 may be under similar LORE control for hypoxia-inducible gene expression.

Extensive studies over the past decade have defined the transcriptional repression mechanism for the regulation of anoxia-inducible genes (reviewed in Refs. 14 and 26) in S. cerevisiae. This mechanism is illustrated by the regulation of ANB1, a prototypic anaerobic-induced yeast gene. Both genetic and biochemical evidence have demonstrated that the normoxic repression of this gene is mediated by the ROX1p repressor through its binding to the ANB1 operator site. The full repression by ROX1p requires two general transcription mediators, SSN6p and TUP1p (43-45). In an anaerobic environment, ROX1 expression is decreased, ROX1p levels decline, and eventually the repression of anoxia-regulated genes is released. Heme and Hap1 are involved in ROX1 expression in normoxic conditions (44-47). Based on the consensus binding sequence of ROX1p, putative ROX1p binding sequences in the promoter regions of many other genes in S. cerevisiae, including OLE1, have been identified. The OLE1 promoter region contains three putative ROX1p-binding sites at -130, -260, and -272 relative to the first nucleotide of the translation start codon (28, 30, 31). Previous studies suggested that OLE1 is only slightly derepressed in a ROX1 disruptant under aerobic conditions (31, 48). The results from the current study confirm that ROX1 does not play a significant role in the basal aerobic expression of the OLE1 gene. There were no significant changes in either reporter gene or OLE1 mRNA expression in a S. cerevisiae strain in which the ROX1 gene had been disrupted. Moreover, both hypoxia- and cobalt-induced OLE1 gene expression was observed in this strain; the expression of the ROX1-mediated anaerobic yeast gene ANB1 was not up-regulated by cobalt. Of note, the hypoxic induction in the ROX1 deletion strain was not as dramatic as its parental strain (4.2-fold versus 9.1-fold increase) in the reporter assay although the cobalt induction in the same strain was similar (4.2-fold versus 5.1-fold increase). This suggests that ROX1 may be involved in the OLE1 hypoxic induction pathway in some capacity; however, our data provide no compelling evidence that ROX1p serves as a repressor of OLE1 expression in normoxia.

Multiple pathways involved in regulating hypoxic and anoxic gene expression in yeast may exist (49). Studies of several other hypoxic/anaerobic genes including SUT1 (34), GPD2 (50), PAU (51), and DNA1 (52) have demonstrated ROX1p-independent hypoxic/anaerobic induction. Another hypoxic/anaerobic gene, TIR/SRP1, has variably been reported to be ROX1p-independent and ROX1p-dependent (35, 37). The identification of a LORE in this study indicates that transcription activation is crucial to the increased expression of certain yeast genes in response to extremely low oxygen tension (versus complete anaerobiosis). The identification of the putative transcriptional activator(s), i.e. the LBP, is under active investigation.

It is also demonstrated in this study that the LORE is involved not only in the hypoxic induction of OLE1 and ATF1, but also in cobalt (Fig. 5) induction. Mutations in the LORE dramatically decrease the reporter expression in both hypoxic and cobalt-treated conditions. However, some cobalt-induced reporter expression is still observed (~4.5-fold induction), suggesting that other as yet undefined elements may be involved. This result is consistent with observations utilizing the OLE1 promoter deletion-lacZ fusion assays (Fig. 2). In the shortest construct (p62::255) there is still a 2.4-fold induction for cobalt-treated yeast, despite no hypoxic induction.

The S. cerevisiae genome-wide search for LOREs in putative promoter regions identified many genes which are potentially regulated by low oxygen tension. One of these genes, the anaerobically-induced gene, TIR1, encodes a stress-induced cell wall mannoprotein, and is also a member of the seripauperine (PAU) family (35, 37, 53). The in vivo function of a putative LORE in its promoter region (-344 to -325) is not known. Another gene, SUT1, encodes a small molecule transporter, and is up-regulated in anaerobic conditions to facilitate the uptake of sterols when sterol biosynthesis is blocked by the absence of oxygen (34). The in vivo significance of a putative LORE found in the SUT1 promoter region (-377 to -358 relative to the translational start codon), is also unclear at this point. Yet another gene identified in the genomic search for potential LOREs in promoter regions is the TRX2 gene, which encodes a small sulfydryl-rich protein thioredoxin. About a 3-fold hypoxic and 2.5-fold cobalt induction of TRX2 mRNA was observed in Northern blot analysis (Fig. 8C). Confirming these data, in vitro EMSA demonstrated that the potential LORE obtained from the TRX2 promoter sequence could indeed form a hypoxia-specific complex. Nonetheless, the role of hypoxic induction of TRX2 in vivo still requires further investigation. The precise physiological function of thioredoxin is not clearly understood; it appears to be part of a cellular nonenzymatic defense system in response to oxidative stress (reviewed in Ref. 54). Evidence for the involvement of reactive oxygen species in mammalian oxygen sensing and signaling exists (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). HIF-1, the mediator of physiological and pathophysiological responses to hypoxia, is subject to complex redox control mechanisms (Refs. 12 and 55, reviewed in Ref. 56). Therefore, it would not be surprising to identify reactive oxygen species involved in oxygen sensing and signaling in yeast.

Interestingly, transcription of the FTR1 gene, which functions as an iron permease mediating high affinity iron uptake in yeast, was reported to be induced by oxygen (38). We have confirmed this result, demonstrating that the FTR1 mRNA level was decreased under hypoxic conditions (data not shown). This suggests that the potential LORE in its promoter region is either nonfunctional or serves as a repression cis element under hypoxic conditions. It is likely that additional factors such as adjacent transcription factor-binding sites, spacing of the binding site, or a lower factor binding affinity in vivo may be critical in the regulation of genes possessing LOREs in their promoter regions.

OLE1 appears to be induced maximally by hypoxia as opposed to anoxia; a genome-wide transcriptional analysis of aerobic and anaerobic chemostat cultures of S. cerevisiae demonstrated that OLE1 has only a marginal (1.3-fold) increase under stringent anaerobic conditions (57). Thus, OLE1 represents a yeast gene that is regulated by hypoxia, certain transition metals (15), and iron chelation, strikingly similar to several hypoxia-inducible mammalian genes, such as erythropoietin, vascular endothelial growth factor, the glucose transporters GLUT1 and GLUT3, and several glycolytic enzymes. Given the importance of the ability to adapt to hypoxic stress throughout evolution, it is not surprising to find yeast and mammalian genes which are similarly regulated. Studies of several hypoxia-inducible mammalian genes have led to the identification of a hypoxia responsive element (58-61) and the heterodimeric hypoxia-inducible factor HIF-1 which binds to it (62). Although functionally the LORE and hypoxia responsive element are similar, sequence analysis does not reveal any similarity. Differences with respect to CoCl2-mediated induction of LORE-containing yeast genes provide additional support to the notion that additional factors most likely exist in S. cerevisiae oxygen-sensing pathways which may not exist in mammalian systems. Likewise, HIF-1alpha homologues have been identified in several organisms, from mouse and rat (63, 64) to Drosophila melanogaster (65-68), although none has been found in S. cerevisiae. Further work to identify and characterize the LBP and investigate its regulation and relationship to the mammalian O2 sensing pathway remains of high interest. HIF-1alpha is primarily regulated by the ubiquitin-proteasome degradation pathway (13, 69, 70) and studies examining the role of this pathway in the regulation of the LBP are ongoing. Understanding the nature of the LBP(s) will likely provide significant insights into the molecular mechanisms which regulate cellular responses to hypoxic stress in lower and higher eukaryotic species.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank H. Franklin Bunn and Fred Winston for invaluable support through all phases of this project. We also thank Steve Hanes and Robert O. Poyton for helpful discussions. We thank Richard S. Zitomer for the gifts of RZ53-6 and RZ53-6 Delta rox1 and Andrew K. Vershon for the pTBA30 plasmid. We thank Andrew Mitchell for preparation of a series of OLE1 promoter-lacZ fusion reporter constructs.


    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institues of Health Grants DK45098 (to M. A. G.), GM45768 (to C. E. M.), and K08 HL03599 (to M. J. V.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Contributed equally to the results of this work.

Present address: Dept. of Adult Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Dept. of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.

|| Present address: Hematology-Oncology Div., University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

Dagger Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Hematology Div., Dept. of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 221 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115. Tel.: 617-732-5841; Fax: 617-739-0748; E-mail: Mark.Goldberg@genzyme.com.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 23, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M009546200

2 M. Vasconcelles, unpublished data.

3 J. M. Cherry, C. Ball, K. Dolinski, S. Dwight, M. Harris, J. C. Matese, G. Sherlock, G. Binkley, H. Jin, S. Weng, and D. Botstein, unpublished info.


    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: HIF-1, hypoxia inducible factor-1; LORE, low oxygen response element; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay(s); FAR element, fatty acid-regulated element; UFA, unsaturated fatty acid; LBP, low oxygen response element-binding protein; bp, base pair(s); TEMED, N,N,N',N'-tetramethylethylenediamine.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES


1. Bunn, H. F., and Poyton, R. O. (1996) Physiol. Rev. 76, 839-885[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Ebert, B. L., and Bunn, H. F. (1999) Blood 94, 1864-1877[Free Full Text]
3. Levy, A. P., Levy, N. S., Wegner, S., and Goldberg, M. A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13333-13340[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Semenza, G. L., and Wang, G. L. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 5447-5454[Abstract]
5. Arany, Z., Huang, L. E., Eckner, R., Bhattacharya, S., Jiang, C., Goldberg, M. A., Bunn, H. F., and Livingston, D. M. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 12969-12973[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Yuan, W., Condorelli, G., Caruso, M., Felsani, A., and Giordano, A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 9009-9013[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Kwok, R. P., Lundblad, J. R., Chrivia, J. C., Richards, J. P., Bachinger, H. P., Brennan, R. G., Roberts, S. G., Green, M. R., and Goodman, R. H. (1994) Nature 370, 223-226[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Gilles-Gonzalez, M. A., Ditta, G. S., and Helinski, D. R. (1991) Nature 350, 170-172[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Goldberg, M. A., Dunning, S. P., and Bunn, H. F. (1988) Science 242, 1412-1415[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Huang, L. E., Arany, Z., Livingston, D. M., and Bunn, H. F. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 32253-32259[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Horiguchi, H., and Bunn, H. F. (2000) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1495, 231-236[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Huang, L. E., Willmore, W. G., Gu, J., Goldberg, M. A., and Bunn, H. F. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 9038-9044[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Zhu, H., Qiu, H., Yoon, H. W., Huang, S., and Bunn, H. F. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 14742-14747[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Zitomer, R. S., and Lowry, C. V. (1992) Microbiol. Rev. 5, 1-11
15. Kwast, K. E., Burke, P. V., Staahl, B. T., and Poyton, R. O. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 5446-5451[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Choi, J. Y., Stukey, J., Hwang, S. Y., and Martin, C. E. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 3581-3589[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Treco, D. A., and Winston, F. (1997) in Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Ausubel, F. M. , Brent, R. , Kingston, R. E. , Moore, D. D. , Seidman, J. G. , Smith, J. A. , and Struhl, K., eds) , pp. 13.2.1-13.2.12, John Wiley & Sons, New York
18. Elble, R. (1992) BioTechniques 13, 18-20[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Reynolds, A., Lundblad, V., Dorris, D., and Keaveney, M. (1997) in Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Ausubel, F. M. , Brent, R. , Kingston, R. E. , Moore, D. D. , Seidman, J. G. , Smith, J. A. , and Struhl, K., eds) , pp. 13.6.2-13.6.3, John Wiley & Sons, New York
20. Pfeifer, K., Arcangioli, B., and Guarente, L. (1987) Cell 49, 9-18[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Carey, J. (1991) Methods Enzymol. 208, 103-117[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E. F., and Sambrook, J. (1982) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , Cold Sping Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
23. Collart, M. A., and Oliviero, S. (1997) in Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Ausubel, F. M. , Brent, R. , Kingston, R. E. , Moore, D. D. , Seidman, J. G. , Smith, J. A. , and Struhl, K., eds) , pp. 13.12.1-13.12.5, John Wiley & Sons, New York
24. Brown, T., and Mackey, K. (1997) in Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Ausubel, F. M. , Brent, R. , Kingston, R. E. , Moore, D. D. , Seidman, J. G. , Smith, J. A. , and Struhl, K., eds) , pp. 4.9.1-4.9.14, John Wiley & Sons, New York
25. Hoffman, C. S. (1997) in Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Ausubel, F. M. , Brent, R. , Kingston, R. E. , Moore, D. D. , Seidman, J. G. , Smith, J. A. , and Struhl, K., eds) , pp. 13.11.2-13.11.4, John Wiley & Sons, New York
26. Kwast, K. E., Burke, P. V., and Poyton, R. O. (1998) J. Exp. Biol. 201, 1177-1195[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Bossier, P., Fernandes, L., Rocha, D., and Rodrigues-Pousada, C. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 23640-23645[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Deckert, J., Torres, A. M., Hwang, S. M., Kastaniotis, A. J., and Zitomer, R. S. (1998) Genetics 150, 1429-1441[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Zitomer, R. S., Limbach, M. P., Rodriguez-Torres, A. M., Balasubramanian, B., Deckert, J., and Snow, P. M. (1997) Methods 11, 279-288[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Zitomer, R. S., Carrico, P., and Deckert, J. (1997) Kidney Int. 51, 507-513[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Stukey, J. E., McDonough, V. M., and Martin, C. E. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 20144-20149[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. van Helden, J., André, B., and Collado-Vides, J. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 281, 827-842[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Salceda, S., and Caro, J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 22642-22647[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Bourot, S., and Karst, F. (1995) Gene (Amst.) 165, 97-102[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Donzeau, M., Bourdineaud, J. P., and Lauquin, J. (1996) Mol. Microbiol. 20, 449-459[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Fujiwara, D., Kobayashi, O., Yoshimoto, H., Harashima, S., and Tamai, Y. (1999) Yeast 15, 1183-1197[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Kitagaki, H., Shimoi, H., and Itoh, K. (1997) Eur. J. Biochem. 249, 343-349[Abstract]
38. Hassett, R. F., Romeo, A. M., and Kosman, D. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 7628-7636[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Conrad, M. N., Wright, J. H., Wolf, A. J., and Zakian, V. A. (1990) Cell 63, 739-750[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Shore, D. (1994) Trends Genet. 10, 408-412[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Shore, D., and Nasmyth, K. (1987) Cell 51, 721-732[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Scott, E. W., and Baker, H. V. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 543-550[Abstract]
43. Balasubramanian, B., Lowry, C. V., and Zitomer, R. S. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 6071-6078[Abstract]
44. Deckert, J., Perini, R., Balasubramanian, B., and Zitomer, R. S. (1995) Genetics 139, 1149-1158[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Williams, F. E., Varanasi, U., and Trumbly, R. J. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 3307-3316[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Lowry, C. V., and Lieber, R. H. (1986) Mol. Cell. Biol. 6, 4145-4148[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Zhang, M., Rosenblum-Vos, L. S., Lowry, C. V., Boakye, K. A., and Zitomer, R. S. (1991) Gene (Amst.) 97, 153-161[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Fujimori, K., Anamnart, S., Nakagawa, Y., Sugioka, S., Ohta, D., Oshima, Y., Yamada, Y., and Harashima, S. (1997) FEBS Lett. 413, 226-230[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Poyton, R. O. (1999) Respir. Physiol. 115, 119-133[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Ansell, R., Granath, K., Hohmann, S., Thevelein, J. M., and Adler, L. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 2179-2187[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51. Rachidi, N., Martinez, M. J., Barre, P., and Blondin, B. (2000) Mol. Microbiol. 35, 1421-1430[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52. Sertil, O., Cohen, B. D., Davies, K. J., and Lowry, C. V. (1997) Gene (Amst.) 192, 199-205[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Bourdineaud, J. P. (2000) Res. Microbiol. 151, 43-52[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Jamieson, D. J. (1998) Yeast 14, 1511-1527[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
55. Lando, D., Pongratz, I., Poellinger, L., and Whitelaw, M. L. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 4618-4627[Abstract/Free Full Text]
56. Semenza, G. L. (2000) J. Appl. Physiol. 88, 1474-1480[Abstract/Free Full Text]
57. ter Linde, J. J., Liang, H., Davis, R. W., Steensma, H. Y., van Dijken, J. P., and Pronk, J. T. (1999) J. Bacteriol 181, 7409-7413[Abstract/Free Full Text]
58. Beck, I., Ramirez, S., Weinmann, R., and Caro, J. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 15563-15566[Abstract/Free Full Text]
59. Blanchard, K. L., Acquaviva, A. M., Galson, D. L., and Bunn, H. F. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 5373-5385[Abstract]
60. Pugh, C. W., Tan, C. C., Jones, R. W., and Ratcliffe, P. J. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 10553-10557[Abstract]
61. Semenza, G. L., Nejfelt, M. K., Chi, S. M., and Antonarakis, S. E. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 5680-5684[Abstract]
62. Wang, G. L., and Semenza, G. L. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 1230-1237[Abstract/Free Full Text]
63. Ladoux, A., and Frelin, C. (1997) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 240, 552-556[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
64. Luo, G., Gu, Y. Z., Jain, S., Chan, W. K., Carr, K. M., Hogenesch, J. B., and Bradfield, C. A. (1997) Gene Expr. 6, 287-299[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
65. Bacon, N. C., Wappner, P., O'Rourke, J. F., Bartlett, S. M., Shilo, B., Pugh, C. W., and Ratcliffe, P. J. (1998) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 249, 811-816[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
66. Nagao, M., Ebert, B. L., Ratcliffe, P. J., and Pugh, C. W. (1996) FEBS Lett. 387, 161-166[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
67. Nambu, J. R., Chen, W., Hu, S., and Crews, S. T. (1996) Gene (Amst.) 172, 249-254[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
68. Wilk, R., Weizman, I., and Shilo, B. Z. (1996) Genes Dev. 10, 93-102[Abstract]
69. Huang, L. E., Gu, J., Schau, M., and Bunn, H. F. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 7987-7992[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.