Identification of Genes Encoding Adenylate Isopentenyltransferase, a Cytokinin Biosynthesis Enzyme, in Arabidopsis thaliana*

Kentaro TakeiDagger §, Hitoshi Sakakibara§, and Tatsuo SugiyamaDagger §

From the Dagger  Department of Biological Mechanisms and Functions, Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan and § RIKEN (The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research), Plant Science Center, Hirosawa 2-1, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan

Received for publication, March 9, 2001, and in revised form, April 4, 2001


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The initial step in the de novo biosynthesis of cytokinin in higher plants is the formation of isopentenyladenosine 5'-monophosphate (iPMP) from AMP and dimethylallylpyrophosphate (DMAPP), which is catalyzed by adenylate isopentenyltransferase (IPT). Although cytokinin is an essential hormone for growth and development, the nature of the enzyme for its biosynthesis in higher plants has not been identified. Herein, we describe the molecular cloning and biochemical identification of IPTs from Arabidopsis thaliana. Eight cDNAs encoding putative IPT, designated as AtIPT1 to AtIPT8, were picked up from A. thaliana. The Escherichia coli transformants expressing the recombinant proteins excreted cytokinin species into the culture medium except for that expressing AtIPT2 that is a putative tRNA IPT. A purified recombinant AtIPT1 catalyzed the formation of iPMP from DMAPP and AMP. These results indicate that the small multigene family contains both types of isopentenyltransferase, which could synthesize cytokinin and mature tRNA.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cytokinin is a phytohormone involved in various processes of growth and development of plants, such as cell division, photosynthesis, chloroplast differentiation, senescence, and nutrient metabolism (1). Although phenylurea-type species are known (2), the most abundant cytokinins in plants are adenine-type species, which are adenines substituted at N6 with an isoprenoid or aromatic side chain.

Multiple routes have been proposed in cytokinin biosynthesis. Transfer RNA degradation has been suggested to be a source of cytokinin (3), because some tRNA molecules contain an isopentenyladenosine (iPA)1 residue at the site adjacent to the anticodon. The modification is catalyzed by tRNA isopentenyltransferase (tRNA IPT; EC 2.5.1.8), which has been identified in various organisms such as Escherichia coli (4-6), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (7, 8), Lactobacillus acidophilus (9), Homo sapiens (10), and Zea mays (11). However, from the calculated tRNA turnover rate, it is estimated that the degradation pathway is not a major source of cytokinin (12). Another possible route of cytokinin formation is de novo biosynthesis of iPMP by adenylate isopentenyltransferase (IPT; EC 2.5.1.27) with DMAPP and AMP as substrates. In the plant pathogenic crowngall-forming bacterium, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, the IPT gene on the Ti-plamid (13) is integrated into the genome of host plant cells after infection. Overproduction of cytokinins by the transduced IPT causes abnormal cell proliferation. The gene has been identified in various bacterial species (13-17), and the translated product has been proved to biosynthesize iPMP, an active cytokinin, in vitro (18). On the other hand, there is little concrete evidence of the authentic biosynthesis of iPMP by IPT in higher plants. Cytokinin has been suggested to be synthesized in specific sites such as the root tip (19), immature kernel (20), and shoot apical meristem (21). However, the activity of plant IPT has been reported in only a few tissues such as immature maize kernels (20) and cytokinin autonomous tobacco callus (22, 23). As the enzyme seemed to be highly unstable and low in content, biochemical approaches to purify and characterize plant IPT have been hampered.

As the first step toward understanding the cytokinin biosynthetic pathway at the molecular level, we tried to identify IPT genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Our study showed that Arabidopsis contains multiple IPT genes encoded by a small multigene family. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the identification of IPT in a higher plant at the molecular level.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Plant Materials-- A. thaliana ecotype Columbia was grown on vermiculite (24) at 22 °C under fluorescent light, at an intensity of about 100 µE m-2 s-1, in a growth chamber with a photoperiod of 16 h (day)/8 h (night).

RT-PCR-- Total RNA was prepared by the guanidine thiocyanate procedure (25). Complementary DNAs were amplified with SuperScript One-step RT-PCR system (Life Technologies, Inc.) essentially as described by the supplier. Sequences of the primers for PCR were: for the AtIPT1, 5'-TCATGACAGAACTCAACTTCCACC-3' and 5'-ATAAAGCTTCTAATTTTGCACCAAATGCCGC-3'; for the AtIPT2, 5'-CGCGGTACCGTCATGATGATGTTAAACCCTAGC-3' and 5'-ATAGTCGACTGATATATAAATCAATTTACTTCTGC-3'; for the AtIPT3, 5'-CGCGGATCCATCATGATCATGAAGATATCTATGGC-3' and 5'-ATAGTCGACGTGGTTACAACTGATCACGCC-3'; for the AtIPT4, 5'-TCATGAAGTGTAATGACAAAATGG-3' and 5'-ATAGTCGACGTTTTGCGGTGATATTAGTCC-3'; for the AtIPT5, 5'-GGGATCATGAAGCCATGCATGACGGC-3' and 5'-GGTTCCTGCAGTACCTCACCGGG-3'; for the IPT6, 5'-CAACAACTCATGACCTTGTTATCACC-3' and 5'-GGCCAAGCTTGGAAAAACAGACTAAACTTCC-3'; for the AtIPT7, 5'-GGCGGATCCTCATGAAGTTCTCAATCTCATC-3' and 5'-GGCCTGCAGCTTTTCATATCATATTGTGGG-3', and for the AtIPT8, 5'-CAAAATCTTACGTCCACATTCGTCTC-3' and 5'-CCGGCTGCAGCTCACACTTTGTCTTTCACC-3'. The primers were designed to generate appropriate restriction sites for constructing the expression plasmids as described below. Reverse transcription was carried out at 50 °C for 30 min, and successive PCR was carried out for 40 cycles at 94 °C for 0.5 min, 55 °C for 0.5 min, and 70 °C for 1.5 min in a thermal cycler (RoboCycler, Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The products of PCR were subcloned into the plasmid pT7blue T-vector (Novagen, Madison, WI).

DNA Sequencing and Sequence Analysis-- Sequencing of cDNAs was performed by the dideoxy chain-termination method (26) using an ABI-PRISM BigDye terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) with an automated DNA sequencer (310 Genetic Analyzer, Applied Biosystems). The GENETYX software system (Software Development Co., Tokyo, Japan) was used for computer analysis of nucleotide sequences and of deduced amino acid sequences.

Construction of Expression Plasmids-- Complementary DNAs containing the reading frame of AtIPT1 to AtIPT8 were excised from the pT7blue derivatives by digestion with appropriate restriction enzymes. Each DNA fragment was inserted into pTrc99A vector (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) at the NcoI site. The JM109 strain of E. coli was used as the host for protein expression. For the expression of Agrobacterium IPT (tmr) in E. coli, the reading frame was amplified by PCR with primers: 5'-CGCAAAAAACCCATGGATCTGCGTC-3' and 5'-CGAACATCGGATCCAAATGAAGACAGG-3', and pTi-SAKURA from A. tumefaciens MAFF301001 (17) as a template. The amplified DNA was digested with NcoI and BamHI, and the resulting fragment was ligated into a pTrc99A vector.

Expression of IPTs in E. coli-- Transformants were grown in M9 minimal medium, which is supplemented with 20 µg/ml ampicillin, 1 M sorbitol, 1% (w/v) casamino acid, 2% (w/v) sucrose, 2.5 mM betaine, 5 µg/ml thiamine, 1 mM MgSO4, and 0.1 mM CaCl2. The cultures were incubated at 25 °C with shaking until the A600 was 0.5. Expression of the IPTs was induced by incubation with 1 mM IPTG at 25 °C for 4 h. The cells were harvested by centrifugation, and the supernatants were used for determination of cytokinin excreted into the medium by ELISA.

E. coli Plating Assay-- An E. coli strain having the Delta rcsC and cps::lacZ genetic background that had been transformed with pIN-III-AHK4 (27) was cultured in Luria broth. Details for the pIN-III plasmid vector were described by Masui et al. (28). The culture of the transformants was mixed with that of E. coli expressing each AtIPT protein. The mixed cells were spotted on Luria agar plates supplemented with X-Gal and incubated at 25 °C.

Purification of Recombinant AtIPT1 from E. coli Cells-- The bacterial cells obtained from 1 litter of culture was suspended with buffer A (1 M betaine, 20 mM HEPES, 100 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, pH 7.5). The cells were disrupted by ultrasonic irradiation on ice. The homogenate was centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C. Nucleic acids were removed from the supernatant by precipitation with 0.0625% (w/v) protamine sulfate. After centrifugation, the supernatant was diluted with an equal volume of buffer B (1 M betaine, 20 mM HEPES, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT pH 7.5) and loaded onto a column of Mono S (FPLC system; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) that had been equilibrated with buffer B. The column was eluted with a linear gradient of KCl from 0 to 500 mM. Pooled fractions containing IPT activity were loaded on a Superdex 200-pg column (HiLoad 16/60, FPLC system) in buffer C (1 M betaine, 20 mM triethanolamine, 100 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, pH 8.0). The final preparation of the AtIPT1 fraction was divided into 0.1-ml aliquots and stored at -80 °C.

Enzyme Assays for IPT-- Two methods were applied to measure the IPT activities. (i) Radioisotope rapid assay: the enzyme assay was carried out as essentially described by Blackwell and Horgan (18). (ii) Nonradioisotope assay: enzyme was incubated in a reaction mixture (1 M betaine, 20 mM triethanolamine, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, pH 8.0) with 1 mM AMP and 340 µM DMAPP at 25 °C for 20 min. The reaction was stopped by the addition of a quarter volume of 10% acetate and centrifuged at 18,000 × g for 20 min. The resulting supernatant was subjected to HPLC with an ODS column (Merck, Supersphere RP-select B; 4 mm inside diameter × 250 mm). Other conditions were as described previously (29). One unit of IPT activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that produced 1 µmol of iPMP/min under the condition of the reaction.

Identification of Cytokinin Species by Mass Spectrometry-- Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of cytokinins was performed on a Platform II LC-MS (Jasco, Tokyo, Japan) with a C18 column (Wakosil-II 5C18 RS, 1 mm inside diameter × 250 mm) using a positive ion electrospray ionization. The cone voltage was 42 V, source temperature was 70 °C, and capillary voltage was 3.0 V. Data were analyzed using Masslinx version 2.1 software.

Others-- Protein was quantitated by Bradford's method (30) with bovine serum albumin as the protein standard. The conventional techniques for manipulation of DNA were those described by Sambrook et al. (31). SDS-PAGE was performed by the method of Laemmli (32).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Isolation of a Set of cDNAs Encoding IPT-like Proteins-- To pick up plant gene(s) encoding IPT, we screened the genome sequence of A. thaliana in silico against the amino acid sequence of an Agrobacterium IPT, tmr (17), as queries. Consequently, eight candidates, designated as AtIPT1 to AtIPT8 having significant homology to tmr, were found. At the amino acid level, tmr has 37.3% similarity to AtIPT1, 32.8% to AtIPT2, 40.8% to AtIPT3, 44.7% to AtIPT4, 40.9% to AtIPT5, 41.2% to AtIPT6, 42.2% to AtIPT7, and 43.6% to AtIPT8. Table I summarizes the structural features of the sequences. The AtIPT genes are distributed all over five chromosomes of Arabidopsis. AtIPT2 was equivalent to a sequence registered as Arabidopsis tRNA IPT (GenBankTM accession numbers AAF00582 and AF109376 for the protein and the mRNA, respectively). Six of the eight (AtIPT1, AtIPT3, AtIPT4, AtIPT6, AtIPT7, and AtIPT8) have been deposited and annotated as "putative" tRNA IPT based on the sequence similarities. One was not annotated as an open reading frame, but we found a possible reading frame on chromosome V, which has homology to other AtIPTs, and designated it AtIPT5.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Structural features of AtIPT genes and proteins

To obtain the cDNAs, total RNA was prepared, and RT-PCR was performed with specific primers as described under "Experimental Procedures." Each PCR amplified a specific cDNA fragment with an expected length (data not shown), and the nucleotide sequences of the cDNAs were determined. Fig. 1A shows a sequence comparison of a set of deduced amino acid sequences of AtIPT proteins. The reading frames of AtIPTs deduced from the cDNA sequences consisted of 318-466 amino acids, which have 34.7-60.6% amino acid identities to AtIPT1. AtIPT2 encoded the longest reading frame. Multiple alignment of the AtIPT showed that AtIPT2 contains two inserted regions of about 80 and 20 amino acids. The carboxyl-terminal region of AtIPT2 also had an extra 40 amino acids. Fig. 1B shows a phylogenetic tree based on a comparison with other representative IPT and tRNA IPT sequences. This calculation implies that the divergence of the AtIPT2 gene occurred before that of other AtIPTs and bacterial IPT genes. These results suggest that the primary structure of putative AtIPT proteins, AtIPT1 and AtIPT3 to AtIPT8, are more closely related to bacterial IPT than tRNA IPT.


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Multiple alignment of amino acid sequence of the predicted translation products of AtIPTs (A) and phylogenetic tree of representative tRNA IPTs and IPTs (B). A, gaps denoted by dashes were inserted to obtain maximum homology. The identical amino acid residues among all AtIPTs are indicated by white letters on a black background and those with AtIPT1 are hatched. Marked stretches (Regions a and b) are discussed in the text. B, the tree was generated using the CLUSTALW program at the DNA Data Bank of Japan. Relative branch lengths are approximately proportional to phylogenetic distance. Eukaryotic tRNA IPT (magenta) from S. cerevisiae (GenBankTM accession number P07884); Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Gen- BankTM accession number CAB52278); H. sapiens (GenBankTM accession number AF074918); C. elegans (Gen- BankTM accession number T27538), prokaryotic tRNA IPT (cyan) from Aquifex aeolicus (GenBankTM accession number G70391); Borrelia burgdorferi (GenBankTM accession number AAC67163); Richettsia prowazekii (Gen- BankTM accession number CAA14962); Mycobacterium leprae (GenBankTM accession number S72942); Streptomyces coelicolor (GenBankTM accession number T35111); A. tumefaciens (GenBankTM accession number P38436); Deinococcus radiodurans (GenBankTM accession number AAF11245); E. coli (GenBankTM accession number AAC77128); Pseudomonas putida (Gen- BankTM accession number AAB69443); Thermotoga maritima (GenBankTM accession number C72366); Bacillus subtilis (GenBankTM accession number G69657); Chlamydia trachomatis (GenBankTM accession number AAC68361); Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 (GenBankTM accession number S75554), bacterial IPT (green) from Agrobacterium rhizogenes pRiA4 (GenBankTM accession number S06738); A. tumefaciens pTiC58 (GenBankTM accession number AAA27406); A. tumefaciens pTi-SAKURA (17); Agrobacterium vitis pTiS4 (GenBankTM accession number S30106); Pseudomonas syringae pCK1 (GenBankTM accession number A24937); Pseudomonas solanacearum (GenBankTM accession number S06739), and Rhodococcus fascians pFiD188 (GenBankTM accession number CAA82744).

Expression of IPTs in E. coli-- The eight cDNAs, AtIPT1 to AtIPT8, were expressed in E. coli under the control of the trc promoter, which can be driven by IPTG. First, to examine the ability of the expressed protein to synthesize cytokinin in vivo, we measured the cytokinin content in the culture medium. As the substrates of IPT, DMAPP, and AMP are provided by authentic metabolism in E. coli, we expected the cytokinins to be synthesized and excreted. As a control, tmr from A. tumefaciens pTi-SAKURA (17) was also expressed in E. coli. As shown in Fig. 2A, when tmr expression was induced, iP was predominantly accumulated in the culture medium. A small amount of Z was also detected. Expression of AtIPT1 and AtIPT3 to AtIPT8 also caused the accumulation of iP and Z in the media. In the culture of E. coli transformants of AtIPT1, AtIPT4, AtIPT7, and AtIPT8, Z content was relatively higher than those of AtIPT3, AtIPT5, and AtIPT6. iPMP, the possible reaction product, and other cytokinin species were below the detectable level in every culture (data not shown). On the other hand, in the culture media of transformants of AtIPT2, no significant accumulation of cytokinin species was detected.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Excretion of cytokinin from recombinant E. coli harboring IPT genes and the IPT activity of the cell extracts. A, each transformant was cultured in the presence of 1 mM IPTG in modified M9 minimal medium for 4 h. The culture media of the transformants were collected, and the cytokinin fraction was purified and the molecular species determined by ELISA. Values shown are the means of three independent replicates. B, the culture of E. coli strain (Delta rcsC, cps::lacZ) harboring pIN-III-AHK4 (27) was mixed with that of E. coli expressing each AtIPT. The mixed cells were spotted on Luria agar plates supplemented with X-Gal and incubated at 25 °C for 48 h. C, the crude extract of each transformant cell was used to measure the IPT activity by radioisotope rapid assay. The amount of each sample for assay was equivalent to 1 A600 unit of cells. One A600 unit is defined as the amount of cells obtained from 1 ml of cell culture whose A600 value is 1.

Using an E. coli system, we attempted to examine the cytokinin biosynthesis ability of the transformants of AtIPT. In Arabidopsis, a cytokinin receptor, AHK4 (identical to CRE1), has been identified recently (27, 33). The Rcs-phosphorelay system in E. coli (RcsCright-arrowYojiNright-arrowRcsB) is involved in extracellular polysaccharide synthesis by activating the cps operon (27). In the E. coli strain having the Delta rcsC and cps::lacZ genetic background, AHK4 can function as a cytokinin-responsive sensory His-kinase through activating the E. coli YojNright-arrowRcsBright-arrowcps::lacZ pathway, thereby giving rise to blue colonies in the presence of external cytokinin and X-Gal (27). When each of the transformants of AtIPT was mixed with that of AHK4 and grown in the presence of X-Gal, all those except for that of AtIPT2 turned blue without externally added cytokinin (Fig. 2B). This was well consistent with the result shown in Fig. 2A.

To confirm the ability of the gene products to synthesize cytokinin, IPT activity was measured by the radioisotope rapid assay with the total extract of the E. coli transformants (Fig. 2C). Although the extent was different, IPT activity was detected in all extracts of the transformants of AtIPTs except for AtIPT2. These results suggest that the gene products of AtIPTs other than AtIPT2 could synthesize cytokinin species in E. coli cells.

Purification and Characterization of Recombinant AtIPTs-- To confirm further the catalytic reaction of the recombinant protein, the AtIPT1 polypeptide was purified as described under "Experimental Procedures." SDS-PAGE of the final preparation showed it to be apparently homogeneous (Fig. 3, lane 6). The catalytic activity of IPT was determined by a nonradioisotope assay.


View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Purification of AtIPT1 produced in E. coli. Samples (lanes 1-4, 20 µg; lanes 5 and 6, 5 µg) from various purification stages were subjected to SDS-PAGE. Lane 1, total extract of noninduced E. coli; lane 2, total extract of 4-h-induced E. coli; lane 3, soluble fraction of the induced E. coli; lane 4, supernatant of protamine sulfate precipitation; lane 5, Mono S column chromatography fraction; lane 6, Superdex 200-pg fraction. The gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. The molecular masses of marker proteins are indicated in kilodaltons (kDa) on the left.

Purified AtIPT1 was incubated with AMP and DMAPP, and the products were loaded on HPLC (Fig. 4). The retention time of a peak of one of the reaction products (Peak A) was identical to that of a peak of iPMP (Fig. 4, A and B). When the reaction products were treated with alkaline phosphatase, the retention time of Peak A was shifted to that of Peak B whose retention time coincided with that of iPA (Fig. 4, A and C). Peaks A and B had an absorbance spectrum identical to that of iPMP and iPA, respectively (data not shown). To identify Peak B, mass spectrometry analysis was performed. Consequently, the mass of the product coincided with the iPA standard (Figs. 4, D and E). These results clearly demonstrated that recombinant AtIPT1 catalyzes the IPT reaction.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Identification of reaction products of assay with purified recombinant AtIPT1. Patterns of elution of iPMP and iPA (A), reaction products of the nonradioisotope assay with AtIPT1 (B), dephosphorylated products after treatment with alkaline phosphatase (C) are shown. iPA standard (D) and Peak B fraction (E) were subjected to mass spectrometry.

Kinetic Parameters of AtIPT1-- The recombinant enzyme of AtIPT enabled us to analyze the kinetic parameters (Table II). The specific activity of AtIPT1 was 57 milliunits/mg of protein, and the Km values for AMP and DMAPP were 185 and 50 µM, respectively. The Km value for AMP of AtIPT1 was much higher than that of ipt1 (85.7 nM) in A. tumefaciens (18). Adenine, adenosine, and isopentenylpyrophosphate were not utilized as the substrates (data not shown). On the other hand, ATP, GTP, ADP, and GDP strongly inhibited the IPT activity. The optimum pH was around 8.0, and there was no activity at pH 6 (data not shown). Due to the unstableness of the other recombinant AtIPTs, the yields of the purified preparation were quite low (data not shown). The enzymatic property of them could not be determined.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Enzymatic properties of AtIPT1


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In this study, we identified genes encoding IPT, a cytokinin biosynthesis enzyme, in A. thaliana. The identity of the cDNA was established by determination of the catalytic activity of the translated products in vivo and in vitro (Fig. 2) and by chemical determination of the reaction product by mass spectrometry (Fig. 4). While all AtIPT sequences had been annotated as putative tRNA IPTs in the A. thaliana Annotation Data base, our results demonstrated that all AtIPTs except for AtIPT2 have IPT activity.

Although AtIPTs did not show close similarity to tRNA IPTs and bacterial IPTs at the amino acid level (detailed alignment is not shown), some common structural features were found. The putative motif for DMAPP binding (34), which is similar to the ATP/GTP-binding motif at the amino-terminal region ((A, G)-X4-G-K-(S, T); Fig. 1A, Region a), was conserved in both types of isopentenyltransferase. In tRNA IPT in E. coli, some nucleotides such as GTP, ATP, and CTP inhibit the activity in a competitive manner with respect to DMAPP (34). In this study, nucleotides such as ATP and ADP strongly inhibited the IPT activity (Table II), suggesting that these nucleotides inhibit the activity by competitive access to the DMAPP-binding site and that the energy status in the cell is involved in the regulation of the IPT activity. Another structural feature is that the carboxyl-terminal extension of AtIPT2 contained putative a zinc finger-like motif (C-X2-C-X12,18-H-X5-H; Fig. 1A, Region b), which is conserved in eukaryotic tRNA IPT such as H. sapiens (10), Caenorhabditis elegans (GenBankTM accession number T27538), and others. The motif is also found in the murine RNA-binding protein ZFR (35) and thought to play an important role in the expression and/or the retention of the activity of eukaryotic tRNA IPTs (10, 36, 37). The absence of IPT activity of AtIPT2 and the structural similarities between AtIPT2 and tRNA IPTs are well consistent with that AtIPT2 is registered as tRNA IPT.

The cytokinin species excreted from the E. coli transformants of AtIPTs did not coincide with that determined by chemical analysis of the in vitro reaction product (Figs. 2 and 4). This discrepancy of detected products between the culture medium and in vitro reaction is attributed to the metabolization of cytokinins in E. coli cells. Namely, iPMP synthesized by AtIPTs is metabolized to iP and Z and excreted to the culture medium. Nonpolar compounds such as iP and Z are expected to penetrate easily across the cell membrane. In fact, the E. coli transformants expressing AtIPT1 and AtIPT3 to AtIPT8 had a growth rate significantly slower than the AtIPT2 (data not shown) probably due to metabolic depletion of DMAPP in the E. coli. The tendency was more remarkable in those expressing AtIPT1, ATIPT4, AtIPT7, and AtIPT8 (data not shown), which excreted Z into the medium. Further metabolization of synthesized iPMP to iP and Z by the authentic dephosphorylation, hydroxylation, and deribosylation systems occur in the E. coli cells.

The existence of isoforms of AtIPT leads us to speculate the differentiation of the physiological function of each isoform in terms of the expression site and the regulatory manner. For instance, cytokinin has been suggested to be synthesized in restricted sites in which cell proliferation is active (19-21). In terms of gene regulation, iPMP has been shown to rapidly accumulate in roots in response to nitrate replenishment to the nitrogen-depleted maize (29). These data imply that the cytokinin biosynthesis genes are expressed differently in spatially and temporally specific areas and in response to various environmental stimuli. Further comparative analysis of the expression pattern of each gene should help elucidate the physiological function.

Recently, an alternative pathway for cytokinin biosynthesis has been proposed by Åstot et al. (38). They provided evidence that IPT could use an unknown compound of terpenoid origin as a side chain donor instead of DMAPP, and the initial product of the pathway is trans-zeatin 5'-monophosphate. When the possible donor compounds become available, we need to determine whether AtIPT can catalyze the alternative reaction to elucidate the biochemical entity of the alternative cytokinin biosynthesis pathway.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We deeply thank Dr. K. Suzuki and Dr. K. Yoshida for kindly providing us with pTi-SAKURA. We are also grateful to Dr. T. Mizuno for his advice and for providing the E. coli strain and pIN-III-AHK4.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Grants-in-aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas (numbers 09274101 and 09274102 (to T. S.) and 12142202 (to H. S.)) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom all correspondence should be addressed: RIKEN (The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research), Plant Science Center, Hirosawa 2-1, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan. Tel.: 81-48-467-6906; Fax: 81-52-467-6857; E-mail: sakaki@postman.riken.go.jp.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 19, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M102130200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: iPA, isopentenyladenosine; DMAPP, dimethylallylpyrophosphate; DTT, dithiothreitol; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography; iP, isopentenyladenine; iPMP, isopentenyladenosine 5'-monophosphate; IPT, adenylate isopentenyltransferase; IPTG, isopropyl-beta -D-thiogalactopyranoside; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RT, reverse transcription; tRNA IPT, tRNA isopentenyltransferase; X-Gal, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-beta -D-galactoside; Z, trans-zeatin; FPLC, fast protein liquid chromatography.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Mok, M. C. (1994) in Cytokinins: Chemistry, Activity, and Function (Mok, D. W. S. , and Mok, M. C., eds) , pp. 155-166, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
2. Shudo, K. (1994) in Cytokinins: Chemistry, Activity, and Function (Mok, D. W. S. , and Mok, M. C., eds) , pp. 35-42, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
3. Swaminathan, S., and Bock, R. M. (1977) Biochemistry 16, 1355-1360[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Bartz, J. K., and Soll, D. (1972) Biochemie (Paris) 54, 31-39
5. Rosenbaum, N., and Gefter, M. L. (1972) J. Biol. Chem. 247, 5675-5680[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Caillet, J., and Droogmans, L. (1988) J. Bacteriol. 170, 4147-4152[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Kline, L. K., Fittler, F., and Hall, R. H. (1969) Biochemistry 8, 4361-4371[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Dihanich, M. E., Najarian, D., Clark, R., Gillman, E. C., Martin, N. C., and Hopper, A. K. (1987) Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 177-184[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Holtz, J., and Klämbt, D. (1975) Hoppe-Seyler's Z. Physiol. Chem. 356, 1459-1464[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Golovko, A., Hjälm, G., Sitbon, F., and Nicander, B. (2000) Gene (Amst.) 258, 85-93[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Holtz, J., and Klämbt, D. (1978) Hoppe-Seyler's Z. Physiol. Chem. 359, 89-101[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Klämbt, D. (1992) in Physiology and Biochemistry of Cytokinins in Plants (Kaminek, M. , Mok, D. W. S. , and Zazímalová, E., eds) , pp. 25-27, SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague
13. Akiyoshi, D. E., Klee, H., Amasino, R. M., Nester, E. W., and Gordon, M. P. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81, 5994-5998[Abstract]
14. Powell, G. K., and Morris, R. O. (1986) Nucleic Acids Res. 14, 2555-2565[Abstract]
15. Crespi, M., Messens, E., Caplan, A. B., van Montagu, M., and Desomer, J. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 795-804[Abstract]
16. Lichter, A., Barash, I., Valinsky, L., and Manulis, S. (1995) J Bacteriol. 177, 4457-4465[Abstract]
17. Suzuki, K., Ohta, N., Hattori, Y., Uraji, M., Kato, A., and Yoshida, K. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1396, 1-7[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Blackwell, J. R., and Horgan, R. (1993) Phytochemistry 34, 1477-1481[CrossRef]
19. Feldman, L. J. (1975) in The Development and Function of Roots (Torrey, J. G. , and Clarkson, D. T., eds) , pp. 55-72, Academic Press, London
20. Blackwell, J. R., and Horgan, R. (1994) Phytochemistry 35, 339-342[CrossRef]
21. Koda, Y., and Okazawa, Y. (1980) Physiol. Plant. 49, 193-197
22. Chen, C.-M., and Melitz, D. K. (1979) FEBS Lett. 107, 15-20[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Chen, C.-M., and Ertl, J. R. (1994) in Cytokinins: Chemistry, Activity, and Function (Mok, D. W. S. , and Mok, M. C., eds) , pp. 81-85, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
24. Fujiwara, T., Yokota-Hirai, M., Chino, M., Komeda, Y., and Naito, S. (1992) Plant Physiol. 99, 263-268
25. Wadsworth, G. J., Redinbaugh, M. G., and Scandalios, J. G. (1988) Anal. Biochem. 172, 279-283[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Sanger, F., Nicklen, S., and Coulson, A. R. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 74, 5463-5467[Abstract]
27. Suzuki, T., Miwa, K., Ishikawa, K., Yamada, H., Aiba, H., and Mizuno, T. (2001) Plant Cell Physiol. 42, 107-113[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Masui, Y., Coleman, J., and Inoue, M. (1983) in Experimental Manipulation of Gene Expression (Inoue, M., ed) , pp. 15-32, Academic Press, New York
29. Takei, K., Sakakibara, H., Taniguchi, M., and Sugiyama, T. (2001) Plant Cell Physiol. 42, 85-93[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed. , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
32. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Inoue, T., Higuchi, M., Hashimoto, Y., Seki, M., Kobayashi, M., Kato, T., Tabata, S., Shinozaki, K., and Kakimoto, T. (2001) Nature 409, 1060-1063[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Leung, H.-C. E., Chen, Y., and Winkler, M. E. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 13073-13083[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Meagher, M., Schumacher, J. M., Lee, K., Holdcraft, R. W., Edelhoff, S., Disteche, C., and Braun, R. E. (1999) Gene (Amst.) 228, 197-211[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. LaCasse, E. C., and Lefebvre, Y. A. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 1647-1656[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Chong, S., Curnow, A. W., Huston, T. J., and Garcia, G. A. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 3695-3701
38. Åstot, C., Dolezal, K., Nordström, A., Wang, Q., Kunkel, T., Moritz, T., Chua, N.-H., and Sandberg, G. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 14778-14783[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.