The SH2 Domain Containing Tyrosine Phosphatase-1 Down-regulates Activation of Lyn and Lyn-induced Tyrosine Phosphorylation of the CD19 Receptor in B Cells*

Ally-Khan SomaniDagger §, Kenneth YuenDagger , Fenhao XuDagger , Jinyi ZhangDagger , Donald R. Branch||, and Katherine A. SiminovitchDagger **

From the Dagger  Departments of Medicine, Immunology and Medical Genetics and Microbiology, University of Toronto, the Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital and the University Health Network Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada, and the || Department of Oncology Research of the University Health Network Research Institute and the Canadian Blood Services, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M1, Canada

Received for publication, July 31, 2000, and in revised form, October 17, 2000



    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

SHP-1 is a cytosolic tyrosine phosphatase implicated in down-regulation of B cell antigen receptor signaling. SHP-1 effects on the antigen receptor reflect its capacity to dephosphorylate this receptor as well as several inhibitory comodulators. In view of our observation that antigen receptor-induced CD19 tyrosine phosphorylation is constitutively increased in B cells from SHP-l-deficient motheaten mice, we investigated the possibility that CD19, a positive modulator of antigen receptor signaling, represents another substrate for SHP-1. However, analysis of CD19 coimmunoprecipitable tyrosine phosphatase activity in CD19 immunoprecipitates from SHP-1-deficient and wild-type B cells revealed that SHP-1 accounts for only a minor portion of CD19-associated tyrosine phosphatase activity. As CD19 tyrosine phosphorylation is modulated by the Lyn protein-tyrosine kinase, Lyn activity was evaluated in wild-type and motheaten B cells. The results revealed both Lyn as well as CD19-associated Lyn kinase activity to be constitutively and inducibly increased in SHP-1-deficient compared with wild-type B cells. The data also demonstrated SHP-1 to be associated with Lyn in stimulated but not in resting B cells and indicated this interaction to be mediated via Lyn binding to the SHP-1 N-terminal SH2 domain. These findings, together with cyanogen bromide cleavage data revealing that SHP-1 dephosphorylates the Lyn autophosphorylation site, identify Lyn deactivation/dephosphorylation as a likely mechanism whereby SHP-1 exerts its influence on CD19 tyrosine phosphorylation and, by extension, its inhibitory effect on B cell antigen receptor signaling.



    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

B cell responses to antigen stimulation are transduced intracellularly via the B cell antigen receptor (BCR),1 a multimeric receptor complex that comprises membrane immunoglobulin and the immunoglobulin alpha  and beta  chains (1, 2). The signals transmitted consequent to antigen engagement drive B lymphocyte activation via a complex signaling network, which biochemically links the receptor complex to cellular responses such as to proliferation, differentiation, and antibody secretion. Transmission of BCR signals via this intracellular circuitry is further regulated by the integration of accessory signals from BCR comodulators (3) and is highly dependent on reversible protein-tyrosine phosphorylation mediated by the balanced activities of protein-tyrosine kinases (PTKs) and phosphatases (PTPs) (4, 5).

The initial events of BCR signal relay are characterized by the activation of several PTKs, including Lyn, Fyn, Blk, Syk, and Btk, and the subsequent recruitment of secondary signaling molecules, including phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), Shc, BLNK/SLP-65, Vav, SOS1, and phospholipase Cgamma (6-12). These initial interactions induce Ras activation, phosphoinositide turnover, increases in intracellular free calcium, and other intermediary events, which ultimately transduce the BCR-evoked signal to the nucleus and consequent proliferation, apoptosis, maturation, or other physiological responses. The mechanisms whereby BCR ligation can induce such a wide diversity of biological outcomes are not well understood but are likely to involve modulation of the BCR signaling pathway by a spectrum of transmembrane and cytosolic signaling effectors that qualitatively and/or quantitatively alter the relay and downstream interpretation of BCR signal (13).

Among the myriad of proteins implicated in the regulation of BCR signaling, the cytosolic protein-tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) SHP-1 is distinguished by its predominant role as an inhibitor of BCR-driven activation events (5). The inhibitory effect of SHP-1 on BCR signaling was initially revealed by the demonstration that BCR-evoked proliferation of mature B cells and clonal deletion of self-reactive B cell precursors are aberrantly increased in the context of SHP-1 deficiency (14, 15). These latter studies involved analysis of B cells from motheaten (me/me) and viable motheaten (mev/mev) mice, animals in which expression of no SHP-1 or a catalytically inactive form of SHP-1 protein, respectively, is associated with increased levels of serum immunoglobulins, high autoantibody titer, and a marked expansion of CD5+ B-1 cells in the periphery (16, 17). At present, the biochemical basis whereby SHP-1 exerts its inhibitory effects on BCR-evoked responses is not entirely defined. This PTP has, however, been shown to interact with the BCR complex in resting B cells and likely acts in this context to maintain the receptor in a tyrosine-dephosphorylated state (14). Following BCR ligation, SHP-1 no longer associates with the BCR, but instead interacts with a number of BCR-inducible tyrosine-phosphoryated transmembrane coreceptors (18-20). These coreceptors, which include CD22, PIR-B, and CD72, have all been implicated in the down-regulation of BCR signaling (21-23) and have been shown to interact with the SHP-1 SH2 domains via phosphorylated tyrosine residues embedded within immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs (ITIMs) (18-20). The inhibitory effects of these receptors depend on their binding to SHP-1 and appear to be realized via SHP-1-mediated dephosphorylation of tyrosine residues within the receptor cytosolic domains and/or other intracellular signaling effectors recruited to these receptors following BCR engagement.

In contrast to the ITIM-containing coreceptor molecules, a number of B cell transmembrane coreceptors modulate BCR signaling so as to amplify the signal and promote its downstream propagation. Among these positive modulatory receptors, the B lineage-specific CD19 molecule appears to play a central role in enhancing BCR coupling to a spectrum of cellular behaviors. CD19, which is expressed as a component of a multimeric complex on the B cell surface (24), becomes rapidly tyrosine-phosphorylated following BCR engagement (25) and consequently interacts with SH2 domain-containing signaling effectors, such as Lyn, Fyn, Syk, Vav, and PI3K, which play integral roles in BCR signal delivery (25-28). Recent data suggest that CD19 effects on BCR signaling reflect its capacity to not only interact with Src-family PTKs but also to amplify the activities of these enzymes (29). As is consistent with the positive role for CD19 in regulation of BCR signaling, mice, which overexpress CD19 consequent to the expression of a CD19 transgene, manifest augmented B cell proliferative responses to BCR cross-linking and show markedly increased serum immunoglobulin levels (30). These animals also display a dramatic increase in the numbers of B-1 lineage cells and a proportionate decrease in the numbers of conventional B cells within the periphery (31). These observations, therefore, reveal the phenotype engendered by CD19 overexpression to be very similar to the B cell phenotype conferred by SHP-1 deficiency, a finding that suggests that the influence of these respective proteins on BCR signaling thresholds reflects the modulation of a common signaling element or cascade. This hypothesis is further supported by our previous data revealing BCR-evoked CD19 phosphorylation to be markedly reduced in cells lacking both the CD45 and SHP-1 PTPs (32) and thus identifying CD19 as a possible target of SHP-1-mediated dephosphorylation.

In the current study, we have directly investigated the role for SHP-1 in modulating the tyrosine phosphorylation of CD19. The results of these studies confirm that BCR-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of CD19 is enhanced in SHP-1-deficient mice but also suggest that the contribution of SHP-1 to the direct dephosphorylation of CD19 is small. Because of these observations, as well as data revealing CD19 to be associated with the Lyn protein-tyrosine kinase following BCR engagement (25, 26) and identifying a central role for Lyn in modifying CD19 effects on B cell survival (33, 34), we next investigated the possibility that SHP-1 influence on CD19 tyrosine phosphorylation is mediated via the regulation of Lyn activity. The results of this analysis indicate both BCR-induced tyrosine phosphorylation and activation of the Lyn protein-tyrosine kinase to be markedly augmented in me/me and mev/mev compared with wild-type B cells. In addition, Lyn inducibly associates with the SHP-1 N-terminal SH2 domain and is dephosphorylated at its autophosphorylation site (Tyr-397) by incubation with SHP-1. These data identify Lyn as a substrate for SHP-1-mediated dephosphorylation/deactivation and suggest that SHP-1 inhibitory effects on Lyn activity contribute to the down-regulation of CD19 tyrosine phosphorylation and may thereby provide an important mechanism for disrupting CD19 interactions with downstream effectors involved in the relay and amplification of BCR-initiated activation signal.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Reagents-- Antibodies used for these studies included the following: PE-conjugated B220 antibody from PharMingen (Mississauga, Ontario), rabbit polyclonal anti-Lyn antibody from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA), monoclonal anti-phosphotyrosine antibody 4G10 from Upstate Biotechnology Inc. (Lake Placid, NY), and goat F(ab')2 anti-mouse IgM antibody from Jackson ImmunoResearch (West Grove, PA). Rat anti-mouse CD19 antibody was produced by the 1D3 hybridoma (provided by Dr. D. Fearon, University of Cambridge School of Medicine, Cambridge, UK) (35), and a rabbit polyclonal anti-CD19 antibody was derived by immunization with a polylysine-conjugated peptide corresponding to amino acids 504-523 within the CD19 cytosolic domain (SynPep Corp., Dublin, CA). Rabbit polyclonal anti-SHP-1 antibody and monoclonal anti-Thy1.2 antibody from the hybridoma clone J1j.10 (ATCCT1B184) were produced in our laboratory as described previously (14, 16). Low-Tox rabbit complement was purchased from Cedarlane (Hornby, ONT), and chemicals used for immunoprecipitation/immunoblotting were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO).

Cells and Cell Lines-- Single cell suspensions of splenocytes were obtained from 10- to 14-day-old C3HeBFeJ-melme (motheaten), C57BL6-mev/mev (viable motheaten), and congenic wild-type (+/+) mice derived at the Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute breeding facility by mating C3HeBFeJ-me/+ and +/+ and C57BL/6J-mev/+ and +/+ breeding pairs. Purified populations of splenic B lymphocytes were obtained from me/me, mev/mev, and wild-type congenic mice by subjecting splenic cell suspensions to erythrocyte lysis in 0.8% ammonium chloride, followed by treatment with anti-Thy1.2 antibody for 30 min on ice and a subsequent 45-min incubation with a 1:15 dilution of rabbit complement (Serotec Ltd., Toronto, Ontario). The cells were then washed and layered over a Percoll gradient (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Baie d'Urfé, Province of Quebec) as described previously (14). The resulting cells were >90% mIg and B220 positive as determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (Becton Dickinson, Mountainview, CA) analysis. The CD5+ murine B lymphoma line (36) (provided by Dr. A. Kaushik, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario) and the WEHI-231 B lymphoma line (purchased from ATCC, Rockville, MD) were cultured at 37 °C in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (Sterile System Inc., Logan, UT), 50 µM 2-beta mercaptoethanol, and 100 µg/ml penicillin/streptomycin.

Cell Stimulation and Lysis-- WEHI-231, CH12, or purified splenic B cells (2-5 × 107) were resuspended in 5 ml of culture medium and stimulated with 40 µg/ml F(ab')2 antibody for varying periods of time. Stimulations were done on ice to retard biochemical reactions when studying the kinetics of CD19 phosphorylation and Lyn kinase activation (37). For biotinylation, 5-6 × 107 cells/ml were suspended at 107 cells/ml in ice-cold PBS and mixed with 0.3 mg/ml sulfo-NHS-Biotin solution (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL). After 30-min incubation at room temperature, the reaction was quenched by 5-min incubation with 50 mg/ml glycine in PBS. Cells were than washed twice in cold PBS and subjected to stimulation as above. Following stimulation, biotinylated or nonbiotinylated cells were incubated in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCI, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 50 µM NaF, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2 mM Na3VO4, 50 mM ZnCl2, 50 µM o-phosphate, 2 mM EDTA, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin) containing either 1% CHAPS (Sigma) or 1% Nonidet P-40. Cell lysates were centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C, and protein concentrations were then determined using the bicinchoninic acid assay (Pierce).

Antibody Coupling to Protein A-Sepharose-- Anti-Lyn or anti-IgG (isotype control) antibody was incubated at 4 °C overnight under rocking conditions with protein A-Sepharose 4B (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in PBS (about 10 µg of antibody per 10 µl of beads). Beads were then washed two times in 0.1 M sodium borate (pH 8.6) and two times in 0.2 M tri-ethanolamine (pH 8.2). Beads were then resuspended in 0.2 M tri-ethanolamine solution containing 40 mM dimethyl pimelimidate dihydrochloride (Pierce) and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with continual rocking. The antibody-coupled beads were washed two times in 200 mM ethanolamine (pH 8.2), two times in 0.1 M sodium borate (pH 8.0), two times in PBS, and resuspended in PBS supplemented with 0.2% NaN3.

Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting-- Lysates were precleared before immunoprecipitation by incubating 1 mg of cell lysate with protein A-Sepharose beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) at 4 °C for 1 h and for an additional 1 h with 40 µl of rabbit preimmune serum. Lysates were then incubated for 2 h at 4 °C with the appropriate antibody (anti-Lyn, anti-IgG isotype control) and 25 µl of protein A- or protein G-Sepharose beads. Immune complexes were then collected by centrifugation, washed four times in lysis buffer, and boiled for 5 min in reducing SDS-gel sample buffer. Samples were then electrophoresed through SDS-polyacrylamide and transferred to nitrocellulose (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Mississauga, Ontario). After 1-h incubation in 3% gelatin, the filters were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with anti-CD19, anti-Lyn, or anti-phosphotyrosine 4G10 antibodies followed by horseradish peroxidase-labeled secondary antibody (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Arlington Heights, ICN) or, for analysis of biotinylated cells, with horseradish peroxidase-avidin (Pierce). Immune complexes were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Stripping and reprobing of the blots were performed according to Amersham Pharmacia Biotech's recommended protocol.

Assay of Phosphatase Activity-- For analysis of CD19-associated phosphatase activity, anti-CD19 immunoprecipitates were prepared (as described above) from 1 mg of lysates of unstimulated or anti-IgM antibody-stimulated motheaten and wild-type B cells. Phosphatase assays were also performed on anti-CD19 and anti-IgG (control) immunoprecipitates prepared from lysates of wild-type splenic B cells immunodepleted of SHP-1 by overnight incubation with an excess of anti-SHP-1 antibody followed by addition of 100 µl of protein A-Sepharose. For this experiment, the complete immunodepletion of SHP-1 protein was confirmed by Western immunoblotting analysis (data not shown). The amount of SHP-1 antibody utilized to completely immunodeplete SHP-1 protein from lysates was predetermines by titration and Western immunoblotting analysis (data not shown). Immunoprecipitates were washed twice in phosphatase buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1.0 mM EDTA, 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 0.1% 2-beta -mercaptoethanol, 0.01% NaN3, pH 7.34) and then incubated for 12 h at 37 °C overnight in phosphatase buffer containing 2 mM p-nitrophenyl phosphate (Sigma). Under these conditions, SHP-1 activity for the substrate has been shown previously to increase linearly with the amount of SHP-1 used in the reaction (38, 39). Reactions were terminated by addition of 0.2 N NaOH, and absorbance was measured at 410 nm by spectrophotometry.

In Vitro Kinase Assay-- Lyn kinase activity was evaluated using immunoprecipitates prepared as described above from unstimulated and stimulated splenic B cells. The immunoprecipitates were washed in kinase buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MnCl2, 0.25 mM Na3VO4, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 0.1 mM 2-beta -mercaptoethanol) and then incubated for 30 min at 30 °C in 20 µl of kinase buffer containing 10 µCi of [gamma -32P]ATP (ICN) with or without 10 µg of GST-Igalpha /beta fusion protein (provided by Dr. Y. Wu, Toronto, Ontario). Samples were resuspended in SDS-gel sample buffer, boiled, and centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 10 min and resolved over 10% SDS-PAGE gels. The 32P-labeled proteins were electrophoretically transferred to Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA) and then visualized by autoradiography. Lyn quantification was performed by anti-Lyn immunoblotting of the membranes using ECL.

In Vitro Binding Assays-- Glutathione S-transferase (GST)-SHP-1 fusion proteins were generated by subcloning the following murine cDNA or polymerase chain reaction-amplified fragments into pGEX2T: the full-length SHP-1 cDNA (GST-SHP-1), a full-length SHP-1 cDNA containing a Cys-453 right-arrow Ser mutation (GST-SHP-1 (C453S)), the SHP-1 N-terminal SH2 domain (amino acids 1-95), the SHP-1 C-terminal SH2 domain (amino acids 110-205), and the SHP-1 N- and C-terminal SH2 domains (amino acids 1-221). These expression plasmids were transfected into Escherichia coli JM101, and the fusion proteins were purified from isopropyl beta -D-thiogalactopyranoside-induced bacteria using glutathione-conjugated Sepharose beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Equimolar amounts of each GST-SHP-1 fusion protein and GST-beads were then incubated at 4 °C for 1 h with 0.9 µg of in vitro 32P-labeled purified Lyn protein. Beads were washed seven times, and the complexes were resuspended in SDS-sample buffer, boiled, analyzed by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to nitrocellulose, and the Lyn protein was visualized by autoradiography.

Cyanogen Bromide Cleavage Analysis-- In vitro [gamma -32P]ATP-labeled Lyn was immunoprecipitated using anti-Lyn antibody and incubated at 37 °C with equal amounts of either GST-SHP-1 or GST-SHP-1 (C453S) protein in 200 µl of phosphatase buffer (10 mM Tris-HC1, 1.0 mM EDTA, 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 0.1% 2-beta -mercaptoethanol, 0.01% NaN3, pH 7.34). The immune complexes were then resolved over SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose. The 56-kDa Lyn-containing bands were then excised from the membranes and subjected to CNBr cleavage as described previously (40). The excised Lyn protein was incubated with 60 mg/ml CNBr in 70% formic acid for at least 2 h at room temperature. Samples were then washed and dried, and the CNBr-generated peptide fragments were resuspended in tricine SDS sample buffer, resolved by separation on 10-20% gradient Tricine SDS-PAGE (Novex, San Diego, CA), transferred to an Immobilon-P membrane, and visualized by autoradiography. Complete digestion of each sample was confirmed by the absence of higher molecular weight 32P-labeled bands, and the CNBr fragments were quantitated by phosphorimaging (Molecular Dynamics).


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

BCR-evoked CD19 Tyrosine Phosphorylation Is Enhanced, but CD19-associated Phosphatase Activity Is Only Marginally Altered, in SHP-1-deficient B Cells-- Previous data from our laboratory and others have revealed modulation of inhibitory coreceptors to represent a major mechanism whereby SHP-1 mediates its down-regulatory effects on BCR signaling (5, 18-20). However, data garnered from the analysis of mice deficient for both the CD45 and SHP-1 PTPs (31) raised the possibility that SHP-1 also influences the tyrosine phosphorylation and, by extension, signaling functions of the positive regulatory coreceptor, CD19. To begin addressing this issue, SHP-1-deficient B cells from me/me and mev/mev mice were evaluated with regards to the kinetics of CD19 phosphorylation following BCR ligation. As illustrated in Fig. 1, anti-phosphotyrosine immunoblotting analysis of CD19 immunoprecipitates from the SHP-1-deficient cells revealed tyrosine phosphorylation of the 115- to 120-kDa species representing CD19 to be markedly increased both constitutively and inducibly in the mev/mev and to a lesser extent in the me/me cells compared with wild-type cells. The increased phosphorylation of CD19 detected in the motheaten cells cannot be attributed to expansion of the CD5+ B-1 cell population in these mice, because CD5+ CH12 cells exhibited normal levels of CD19 phosphorylation both before and after BCR cross-linking (data not shown). These data support the contention that SHP-1 modulates CD19 tyrosine phosphorylation and are consistent with previous data revealing BCR-evoked CD19 phosphorylation to be augmented in a B cell line derived from me/me mice (41).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   CD19 tyrosine phosphorylation is increased in SHP-1-deficient motheaten B cells. Purified splenic B cells isolated from C57BL/6J-wild-type (+/+) or viable motheaten (Mev) mice (A) or from C3HeBFeJ-wild-type (+/+) or motheaten (Me) mice (B) were stimulated with 40 µg/ml goat F(ab')2 anti-mouse IgM antibody for the indicated times. Lysate proteins (1 mg) were then immunoprecipitated with anti-CD19 antibody (1D3), resolved on 10% SDS-PAGE, and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and the membranes were then immunoblotted with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody. Loading of equivalent amounts of CD19 protein was confirmed by reblotting with either horseradish peroxidase-avidin (A) or anti-CD19 (B) antibodies (lower left and right panels, respectively). Arrows indicate the position of CD19. Mobilities of molecular mass standards are shown on the left.

To more directly investigate the possibility that CD19 represents a SHP-1 substrate, the SHP-1-deficient B cells were next compared with wild-type B cells in terms of the levels of tyrosine phosphatase activity coimmunoprecipitated with CD19 from these respective cell populations. The results of this analysis demonstrated levels of CD19-associated phosphatase activity to be markedly increased following BCR ligation in both wild-type and me/me B cells (Fig. 2). Although levels of phosphatase activity coprecipitated with CD19 were lower in me/me compared with wild-type B cells and were also relatively reduced in B cells immunodepleted for SHP-1, the reduction in coprecipitated phosphatase activity observed in the SHP-1-deficient cells was only modest. These findings indicate that SHP-1 is not the major CD19-associated tyrosine phosphatase and suggest that SHP-1 contribution to the direct dephosphorylation of CD19 may be small. This interpretation of the data is consistent with the data shown in Fig. 1A, indicating that tyrosine dephosphorylation of CD19 proceeds normally in motheaten B cells and is not diminished in the SHP-1-deficient compared with wild-type B cells at the 10-min time point following BCR stimulation. This conclusion is also supported by our observation of minimal amounts of SHP-1 in anti-CD19 immunoprecipitates from unstimulated and stimulated B cells (data not shown), a finding also consistent with the lack of ITIMs in the CD19 cytosolic region. Along similar lines, SHP-1 deficiency has been shown to have negligible impact on the enhanced dephosphorylation of CD19, which occurs in conjunction with Fcgamma RIIB-mediated inhibition of BCR signaling (42, 43). Taken together, these data suggest a minimal role for SHP-1 in the direct dephosphorylation of CD19.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   BCR-induced increases in CD19-associated PTP activity are only modestly influenced by SHP-1 deficiency. Splenic B cells purified from C3HeBFeJ wild-type (C3H+/+) or motheaten (Me) mice were stimulated with goat F(ab')2 anti-mouse IgM antibody (40 µg/ml) for 5 min. Cells were lysed in 1% CHAPS lysis buffer, and lysate proteins (1 mg) were then immunoprecipitated with anti-CD19 or isotype IgG control antibodies. CD19 was also immunoprecipitated from normal anti-IgM antibody-stimulated splenic B cell lysates pretreated with an excess of anti-SHP-1 antibody (SHP-1-depleted). The precipitated proteins were incubated for 12 h at 37 °C in phosphatase buffer containing 1 mM p-nitrophenyl phosphate. After addition of 0.2 M NaOH, absorbance was measured at 410 nm using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay plate reader. Phosphatase activity was quantified in millimoles based on a standardized concentration curve of the product p-nitrophenol (PNP). Bars indicate the standard deviations obtained from three independent experiments.

BCR-induced Activation of the Lyn PTK Is Enhanced in SHP-1-deficient Cells-- Although the precise profile of effectors that mediate induction of CD19 tyrosine phosphorylation following BCR ligation is unclear, an important role for the Lyn PTK has been suggested by the detection of Lyn kinase activity in anti-CD19 immunoprecipitates and by data implicating the CD19-Lyn complex in regulation of B cell survival (25, 26, 34). In view of these observations, the kinase activity contained in immunoprecipitates from me/me and mev/mev B cells was next investigated using an in vitro assay of kinase activity. The results of this analysis revealed Lyn-mediated autophosphorylation and phosphorylation of exogenous substrate (GST-Igalpha /beta ) to be both constitutively and inducibly higher in the me/me and mev/mev B cells than in wild-type B cells (Fig. 3, A and B). Similarly, analysis of the Lyn kinase activity contained in CD19 immunoprecipitates from resting and BCR-stimulated cells demonstrated CD19-associated Lyn activity to be both constitutively and inducibly enhanced in SHP-1-deficient compared with wild-type cells (Fig. 3C). Lyn association with CD19 was also increased in the context of SHP-1 deficiency, an observation consistent with previous data linking increases in Lyn activity to enhanced phosphorylation of the CD19 tyrosine residues mediating Lyn binding to CD19 (44). As shown in Fig. 3D, tyrosine phosphorylation status of Lyn was also evaluated by anti-phosphotyrosine immunoblotting analysis of Lyn immunoprecipitates from the cells under study. The results of this analysis revealed tyrosine phosphorylation of Lyn both before and after BCR ligation to be increased in the motheaten cells. These results, therefore, indicate SHP-1 deficiency to be associated with heightened Lyn activity and strongly suggest that Lyn is a SHP-1 substrate. Interestingly, increases in Lyn activity have also been detected in pre-B cell lines derived from motheaten bone marrow (45). However, in this latter system, the augmentation in Lyn activity was ascribed to the expression of increased Lyn protein in these mutant cells. By contrast in the current analysis, levels of Lyn protein were found to be comparable in splenic B cells isolated from either wild-type or motheaten mice. Thus, these data suggest that SHP-1 induces the dephosphorylation and deactivation of Lyn and that the SHP-1 effect on CD19 phosphorylation may be mediated via the down-regulation of Lyn activity.



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Lyn and CD19-associated Lyn activities are enhanced in SHP-1-deficient B cells. Splenic B cells (2 × 107) purified from C57BL/6J wild-type (+/+) and viable motheaten (Mev) mice (A) and from C3HeBFeJ wild-type (+/+) and motheaten (Me) mice (B) were stimulated with goat F(ab')2 anti-mouse IgM antibody (40 µg/ml) for the indicated times. Lysate proteins were then immunoprecipitated with either anti-Lyn (A, B, and D) or anti-CD19 (C) antibody. Immunoprecipitates were then subjected to an in vitro kinase assay in the presence of [gamma -32P]ATP with (A and B) or without (C) exogenous substrate GST-Igalpha /beta . Samples were resolved on SDS-PAGE, transferred to an Immobilon-P membrane, and visualized by autoradiography. Alternatively, the Lyn immunoprecipitates were subjected to immunoblotting with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (D). Levels of Lyn protein were determined by reprobing the blots with anti-Lyn antibody (lower segment of each panel), the positions of Lyn and GST- Igalpha /beta are shown on the right.

Lyn Associates with the SHP-1 N-terminal SH2 Domain-- In view of the apparent role for SHP-1 in modulating Lyn kinase activity, the possibility that these enzymes associate with one another in resting and stimulated B cells was next investigated. As shown in Fig. 4A (upper panel), anti-SHP-1 immunoblotting analysis of Lyn immunoprecipitates prepared from resting and BCR-ligated WEHI-231 B cells revealed SHP-1 to be present in Lyn immunoprecipitates from stimulated but not unstimulated cells. Association of SHP-1 with Lyn has also been previously detected in U937 myeloid leukemia cells, although, in the latter study the association of these enzymes appeared to occur constitutively (46). By contrast, in the current study, SHP-1 binding to Lyn was up-regulated by cell stimulation, a result that suggests the interaction may be phosphotyrosine-dependent and involve binding of the SHP-1 SH2 domains with phosphorylated tyrosine residues on Lyn. To investigate this possibility, GST fusion proteins containing full-length SHP-1, a catalytically inert form of SHP-1 (SHP-1 C453S), and one or both of the SHP-1 SH2 domains were evaluated for their capacities to interact with in vitro phosphorylated Lyn. The results of this analysis revealed the interaction of phosphorylated Lyn with the N-terminal, but not the C-terminal, SHP-1 SH2 domain (Fig. 4B). As shown in Fig. 4B, the fusion protein containing the C- and the N-terminal SHP-1 SH2 domain precipitated more Lyn protein than did the GST-N-terminal SHP-1 fusion protein. This observation is consistent with previous data indicating that a single SH2 domain may be sufficient for SHP-1 interaction with target substrate, but may be less efficient than the combined SH2 domains in promoting such interactions (47). In addition, these data do not preclude the possibility that SHP-1 association with Lyn involves other sites within these respective proteins. The Lyn SH3 domain has, for example, been implicated in the Lyn-SHP-1 interaction detected in myeloid cell lines (46), and the association of SHP-1 with the related Src PTK appears to involve interactions between not only the SHP-1 SH2 domains and phosphorylated Src, but also the Src SH2 domain and phosphorylated SHP-1 (48, 49). In addition, both SHP-1 and Lyn associate with other signaling effectors, such as PI3K (50, 51), that are recruited to the BCR following its stimulation and that may create a structural framework at the membrane that enhances SHP-1 association with Lyn. Although the relative importance of these various interactions to SHP-1-Lyn binding remains to be determined, the current data are consistent with the conclusion that SHP-1 physically associates with Lyn in B cells and is therefore appropriately positioned to induce dephosphorylation and deactivation of the kinase.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   SHP-1 associates with Lyn. A, lysates were prepared from unstimulated or goat F(ab')2 anti-mouse IgM (40 µg/ml)-stimulated cells and the lysate proteins (500 µg) immunoprecipitated with bead-coupled anti-Lyn or anti-IgG isotype control antibodies. The immunoprecipitated as well as total cell lysate proteins were then immunoblotted with anti-SHP-1 (upper panel) or anti-Lyn (lower panel) antibodies. B, anti-Lyn antibody (first lane on the left) or glutathione-Sepharose-bound GST fusion proteins containing either GST alone (GST), the SHP-1 N- and C-terminal (GST-SH2(N+C)) domains, the single N (GST-SH2(N)) or the single C (GST-SH2(C))-terminal SH2 domains, the full-length wild-type SHP-1 (GST-SHP-1) or the catalytically inert SHP-1 (GST-SHP-1(C453S)) proteins were used to precipitate in vitro 32P-labled purified Lyn proteins (0.9 µg/lane) at 4 °C for 1 h, and the precipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE, transferred to Immobilon-P, and visualized by autoradiography.

The data shown in Fig. 4B also reveal the signal intensity of the Lyn species precipitated with the SHP-1 C453S fusion protein to be greater than that of the species precipitated with the wild-type SHP-1 fusion protein. This observation most likely reflects the substrate trapping properties of SHP-1 C453S and, by extension, indirectly supports the contention that Lyn represents a SHP-1 substrate. Conversely, the association between SHP-1 and Lyn may also provide a framework for Lyn to phosphorylate SHP-1. SHP-1 has in fact been shown to represent a substrate for Lyn in an exogenous expression system (46), and several Src-family kinases (Src, Lck, and Lyn) can phosphorylate SHP-1 in vitro (46, 49, 52). Moreover, in the BCR-stimulated splenic B cells studied here, the tyrosine phosphorylation of Lyn-associated SHP-1 was found to be increased compared with that detected in the total pool of SHP-1 (data not shown). These findings suggest that SHP-1 is phosphorylated by Lyn in vivo and raise the possibility that SHP-1 and Lyn engage in a reciprocal functional relationship wherein Lyn phosphorylates and potentially activates SHP-1 and SHP-1 then dephosphorylates and deactivates Lyn. This functional paradigm has been suggested with respect to SHP-1 modulation of Lyn-dependent apoptotic responses to DNA damage (46) and also in relation to SHP-1 modulation of ZAP-70-dependent proliferative response to T cell antigen receptor engagement (53). However, at present the relationship between SHP-1 tyrosine phosphorylation status and its catalytic activity is unclear (52, 54), and accordingly, the relevance of Lyn to SHP-1 activation remains to be determined. By contrast, the available data provide compelling evidence that SHP-1 negatively regulates Lyn activity and thus suggest that SHP-1 modulation of Lyn plays a role in SHP-1-mediated inhibition of BCR signaling.

SHP-1 Catalyzes the Dephosphorylation of Tyr-397 within the Lyn Kinase Domain-- As for other Src-family PTKs, Lyn contains two major sites of tyrosine phosphorylation, these being the autophosphorylation site (Tyr-397) within the protein kinase domain and the negative regulating tyrosine phosphorylation site (Tyr-508) within the C-terminal tail (55). To determine whether SHP-1 targets the autophosphorylation site on Lyn, as is predicted by the detection of increased Lyn activity in SHP-1-deficient cells, the effects of SHP-1 on Lyn tyrosine phosphorylation were examined using CNBr cleavage analysis. Prior to this analysis, the capacity of recombinant SHP-1 to induce Lyn dephosphorylation in vitro was initially assessed by evaluating the effects of GST-SHP-1 and catalytically inert GST-SHP-1 C453S fusion proteins on 32P-labeled Lyn immunoprecipitates prepared from WEHI-231 and CH12 cells. As illustrated in Fig. 5A, signal intensity and, by extension, the phosphorylation status of the radiolabeled Lyn was markedly reduced in the SHP-1-treated compared with the SHP-1 C453S-treated samples. Based on these findings, the sites on Lyn, which are dephosphorylated by SHP-1, were next examined by subjecting SHP-1 and SHP-1 C453S-treated 32P-labeled Lyn to CNBr cleavage. As illustrated in Fig. 5B, CNBr treatment of Lyn is predicted to generate multiple cleavage fragments, most notably including an 8-kDa fragment containing the autophosphorylation site, Tyr-397, and a 4-kDa fragment encompassing the inhibitory tyrosine phosphorylation site, Tyr-508. In the current study, these latter two fragments, which have been previously confirmed to be phosphotyrosine-containing regions of Lyn (55), were both easily detected following CNBr hydrolysis of SHP-1 C453S-treated Lyn (Fig. 5B). However, although phosphorylation of the Lyn regions represented by both the 8.0- and the 4.0-kDa Lyn CNBr cleavage fragments was diminished following treatment with wild-type SHP-1, the reduction in phosphorylation of the 8-kDa cleavage fragment was much more dramatic than that of the 4-kDa fragment, particularly in the context of Lyn pretreatment with 1.0 µg of SHP-1. These data suggest that both Tyr-397 contained within the 8-kDa fragment and Tyr-508 contained within the 4-kDa fragment can be dephosphorylated by SHP-1, but also indicate that SHP-1 preferentially dephosphorylates Tyr-397. Thus, these findings reveal the capacity of SHP-1 to directly dephosphorylate Lyn at the autophosphorylation site as is consistent with a role for SHP-1 in negatively regulating Lyn activity. The current data also suggest that the C-terminal inhibitory phosphotyrosine on Lyn is not regulated by SHP-1, a conclusion supported by previous data revealing the phosphorylated C-terminal tyrosine on Lyn to be targeted by the CD45 PTP (55). Thus phosphorylation and activation of Lyn appears to be regulated in a fashion highly similar to that of the related Lck PTK, the latter of which is also tyrosine-dephosphorylated at its autophosphorylation site by SHP-1 (52) and at its inhibitory C-terminal site by CD45 (56). A role for CD45 in activating Lyn is also suggested indirectly by the diminution of BCR-induced CD19 tyrosine phosphorylation detected in CD45-deficient mice (32). Thus CD45 and SHP-1 appear to exert opposing effects on Lyn activity and thereby engender a biochemical counterbalance critical to the modulation of CD19 and potentially to the regulation of other signaling effectors involved in BCR signal delivery.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   SHP-1 dephosphorylates the autophosphorylation site of Lyn. A, WEHI-231 or CH12 cells were stimulated with goat F(ab')2 anti-mouse IgM antibody for 5 min. Lysate proteins were then immunoprecipitated with bead-coupled anti-Lyn antibody and subjected to an in vitro Lyn kinase assay in the presence of [gamma -32P]ATP. The 32P-labeled Lyn was then incubated for 2 h at 37 °C with 20 µg of GST fusion proteins containing 20 µg of catalytically inert (C453S) or active SHP-1. Lyn immunoprecipitates were then resolved on SDS-PAGE, transferred to membrane, and visualized by autoradiography (upper panel). The level of Lyn protein was determined by immunoblotting the filters with anti-Lyn antibody (lower panel). B, CNBr analysis of SHP-1-treated Lyn. The diagram shows the predicted CNBr cleavage sites within p56 Lyn (hatched lines) and the tyrosine residues representing the major sites for autophosphorylation (Y397) and inhibitory regulation (Y508). The 8- and 4-kDa cleavage fragments encompassing Tyr-397 and Tyr-508, respectively, are shown under the cleavage map. Following 32P-labeling in vitro, purified Lyn was incubated for 5 min at 37 °C with GST fusion proteins containing catalytically inert SHP-1 (C453S) (4.5 µg) or active SHP-1 (0.5 and 1 µg). The labeled Lyn was then purified and subjected to CNBr cleavage, and the fragments were analyzed by electrophoresis over a 10-20% gradient of Tricine SDS-PAGE, followed by transfer to membrane, and autoradiography analysis. This result is a representative example of three independent experiments.

The data reported in this study establish the capacity of SHP-1 to modulate CD19 tyrosine phosphorylation but link this effect to SHP-1-mediated dephosphorylation of Lyn rather than to dephosphorylation of CD19 per se. Importantly, although Lyn interactions with CD19 appear to exert a positive effect on BCR signal delivery, recent data derived largely from the analysis of Lyn-deficient mice, have revealed a pivotal role for this PTK in the negative regulation of BCR signaling (57, 58). This inhibitory effect of Lyn appears to be realized at least in part through its phosphorylation of the inhibitory coreceptor CD22, an event that evokes SHP-1 binding to CD22 and that is required for CD22 to negatively modulate BCR signaling (59, 60). Interestingly, SHP-1 association with CD22 also appears relevant to the modulation of CD19 tyrosine phosphorylation, as BCR-evoked phosphorylation of CD19 is increased in the context of CD22 deficiency (61). These data suggest the involvement of SHP-1 and Lyn in a complex BCR inhibitory signaling axis wherein CD19-positive effects on BCR signal are antagonized by SHP-1-mediated down-regulation of Lyn activation and by extension, CD19, whereas CD22-negative effects on BCR signal delivery are enhanced by Lyn-mediated phosphorylation of CD22 and the consequent recruitment of SHP-1 and dephosphorylation of Lyn and/or other effectors. SHP-1 interactions with Lyn may also influence the activities of several other BCR-activated signaling effectors, such as Syk and PI3-K, which appear to be substrates for both these enzymes (50, 51, 62, 63). Thus the capacity of SHP-1 to dephosphorylate and deactivate Lyn may impact upon many of the intracellular biochemical events evoked by BCR ligation and, in this context, is likely to represent a very significant mechanism whereby SHP-1 realizes its inhibitory effects on BCR signaling.


    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by grants from the Medical Research Council (MRC) of Canada and the Arthritis Society of Canada.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ A recipient of a National Cancer Institute of Canada Studentship Award.

A recipient of an Arthritis Society/MRC fellowship.

** A Senior Scientist of the Medical Research Council of Canada and the Arthritis Society of Canada. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Mount Sinai Hospital, Rm. 656A, 600 University Ave., Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada. Tel.: 416-586-8723; Fax: 416-586-8731; E-mail: ksimin@mshri.on.ca.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 20, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M006820200


    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: BCR, B cell antigen receptor; Fcgamma RIIB, B cell receptor for IgG Fc region; GST, glutathione S-transferase; me/me, motheaten; mev/mev, viable motheaten; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; PTK, protein-tyrosine kinase; PTP, protein-tyrosine phosphatase; SH, Src homology domain; Tricine, N-tris-[hydroxymethyl]methylglycine; CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; ITIM, immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES


1. Justement, L. B. (2000) Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 245, 1-51
2. Reth, M., and Wienands, J. (1997) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 15, 453-479[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Campbell, K. S. (1999) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 11, 256-264[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Tedder, T. F. (1998) Semin. Immunol. 10, 259-265[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Siminovitch, K. A., and Neel, B. J. (1998) Semin. Immunol. 10, 329-347[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. De Franco, A. L. (1997) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 9, 296-308[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Gold, M. R., and Aebersold, R. A. (1994) J. Immunol. 152, 42-50[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Lankester, A. C., van Schijndel, G. M., Rood, P. M., Verhoven, A. J., and van Lier, R. A. (1994) Eur. J. Immunol. 24, 2818-2825[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Fu, C., Turck, C. W., Kurosaki, T., and Chan, A. C. (1998) Immunity 9, 93-103[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Wienands, J., Schweikert, J., Wollscheid, B., Jumaa, H., Nielson, P. J., and Reth, M. (1998) J. Exp. Med. 188, 791-795[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Saxton, T. M., van Oostveen, J., Bowtell, D., Aebersold, R., and Gold, M. R. (1994) J. Immunol. 153, 623-636[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Deckert, M., Tartare-Deckert, S., Couture, C., Mustelin, T., and Altman, A. (1996) Immunity 5, 591-604[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Smith, K. G. C., and Fearon, D. T. (2000) Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 245, 195-212[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Pani, G., Kozlowski, M., Cambier, J. C., Mills, G. B., and Siminovitch, K. A. (1995) J. Exp. Med. 181, 2077-2084[Abstract]
15. Cyster, J. G., and Goodnow, C. C. (1995) Immunity 2, 13-24[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Kozlowski, M., Mlinaric-Rascan, I., Feng, G.-S., Shen, R., Pawson, T., and Siminovitch, K. A. (1993) J. Exp. Med. 178, 2157-2163[Abstract]
17. Shultz, L. D., and Sidman, C. L. (1987) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 5, 367-403
18. Doody, G. M., Justement, L. B., Delibrias, C. C., Matthews, R. J., Lin, J., Thomas, M. L., and Fearon, D. T. (1995) Science 269, 242-244
19. Blery, M., Kubagawa, H., Chen, C. C., Vely, F., Cooper, M. D., and Vivier, E. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 2446-2451[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Wu, Y., Nadler, M. J., Brennan, L. A., Gish, G. D., Timms, J. F., Fusaki, N., Jongstra-Bilen, J., Tada, N., Pawson, T., Wither, J., Neel, B. G., and Hozumi, N. (1998) Curr. Biol. 8, 1009-1017[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. O'Keefe, T. L., Williams, G. T., Davies, S. L., and Neuberger, M. S. (1996) Science 274, 798-801[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Maeda, A., Kurosaki, M., Ono, M., Takai, T., and Kurosaki, T. (1998) J. Exp. Med. 187, 1355-1360[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Nomura, T., Han, H., Howard, M. C., Yagita, H., Yakura, H., Honjo, T., and Tsubata, T. (1996) Int. Immunol. 8, 867-875[Abstract]
24. Bradbury, L., Kansas, G. S., Levy, S., Evans, R. L., and Tedder, T. F. (1992) J. Immunol. 149, 2841-2850[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Uckun, F. M., Burkhardt, A. L., Jarvis, L., Jun, X., Stealey, B., Dibirdik, I., Myers, D. E., Tuel-Ahlgren, L., and Bolen, J. B. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 21172-21184[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. van Noesel, C. J. M., Lankester, A. C., van Schijndel, G. M. V., and van Lier, R. A. W. (1993) Int. Immunol. 5, 699-705[Abstract]
27. Tuveson, D. A., Carter, R. H., Soltoff, S. P., and Fearon, D. T. (1993) Science 260, 986-989
28. Weng, W. K., Jarvis, L., and Le Bien, T. W. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 32514-32521[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Fujimoto, M., Poe, J. C., Jansen, P. J., Sato, S. S., and Tedder, T. F. (1999) J. Immunol. 162, 7088-7094[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Engel, P., Zhou, L.-J., Ord, D. C., Sato, S., Koller, B., and Tedder, T. (1995) Immunity 3, 39-50[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Sato, S., Ono, N., Steeber, D. A., Pisetsky, D. S., and Tedder, T. F. (1996) J. Immunol. 157, 4371-4378[Abstract]
32. Pani, G., Siminovitch, K. A., and Paige, C. J. (1997) J. Exp. Med. 186, 581-588[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Uckun, F. M., Evans, W. E., Waddick, K. G., Tuel-Ahlgren, L., Chelstrom, L. M., Burkhardt, A. C., Bolen, J. B., and Myers, D. E. (1995) Science 267, 886-891
34. Myers, D. E., Jun, X., Waddick, K. G., Forsyth, C., Chelstrom, L. M., Gunther, R. L., Tumer, N. E., Bolen, J., and Uckun, F. M. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 9575-9579[Abstract]
35. Krop, I., de Fougerolles, A. R., Hardy, R. R., Allison, M., Schlissel, M. S., and Fearon, D. T. (1996) Eur. J. Immunol. 26, 238-242[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Arnold, L. W., La Cascio, N. J., Lutz, P. M., Pennell, C. A., Klapper, D., and Haughton, G. (1983) J. Immunol. 131, 2064-268[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Burg, D. L., Furlong, M. T., Harrison, M. L., and Geahlen, R. L. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 28136-28142[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Kon-Kozlowski, M., Pani, G., Pawson, T., and Siminovitch, K. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 3856-3862[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Pei, D., Neel, B. G., and Walsh, C. T. (1993) Proc, Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 1092-1096[Abstract]
40. Hurley, T. R., Hyman, R., and Sefton, B. M. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 1651-1656[Abstract]
41. Nadler, M. J. S., Chen, B., Anderson, J. S., Wortis, H. H., and Neel, B. G. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 20038-20043[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Kiener, P. A., Lioubin, M. N., Rohrschneider, L. R., Ledbetter, J. A., Nadler, S. G., and Diegel, M. L. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 3838-3844[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Hippen, K. L., Buhl, A. M., D'Ambrosio, D., Nakamura, K., Persin, C., and Cambier, J. C. (1997) Immunity 7, 49-58[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Fujimoto, M., Fujimoto, Y., Poe, J. C., Jansen, P. J., Lowell, C. A., Defranco, A. L., and Tedder, T. F. (2000) Immunity 1, 47-57
45. Yang, W., McKenna, S. D., Jiao, H., Tabrizi, M., Lynes, M. A., Shultz, L. D., and Yi, T. (1998) Exp. Hematol. 26, 1126-1132[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Yoshida, K., Kharbanda, S., and Kufe, D. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 34663-34668[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Blasioli, J., Paust, S., and Thomas, M. L. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 2303-2307[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Somani, A. K., Bignon, J. S., Mills, G. B., Siminovitch, D. B., and Branch, D. R. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 21113-21119[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Falet, H., Ramos-Morales, F., Bachelot, C., Fischer, S., and Rendu, F. (1996) FEBS Lett. 383, 165-169[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Yamanashi, Y., Fukui, Y., Wongsasant, B., Kinoshita, Y., Ichimori, Y., Toyoshima, K., and Yamamoto, T. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 1118-1122[Abstract]
51. Cuevas, B., Lu, Y., Watt, S., Zhang, J., Siminovitch, K. A., and Mills, G. B. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 27583-27589[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52. Lorenz, U., Ravichandran, K. S., Burakoff, S. J., and Neel, B. G. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 9624-9629[Abstract/Free Full Text]
53. Plas, D. R., Johnson, R., Pingel, J. T., Matthews, R. J., Dalton, M., Roy, G., Chan, A. C., and Thomas, M. L. (1996) Science 272, 1173-1176[Abstract]
54. Uchida, T., Matozaki, T., Noguchi, T., Yamao, T., Horita, K., Suzuki, T., Fujioka, Y., Sakamoto, C., and Kasuga, M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 12220-12228[Abstract/Free Full Text]
55. Pao, L. I., and Cambier, J. C. (1997) J. Immunol. 158, 2663-2669[Abstract]
56. Desai, D. M., Sap, J., Silvennoinen, O., Schlessinger, J., and Weiss, A. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 4002-4010[Abstract]
57. Nishizumi, H., Horikawa, K., Mlinaric-Rascan, I., and Yamamoto, T. (1998) J. Exp. Med. 187, 1343-1348[Abstract/Free Full Text]
58. Chan, V. W, Lowell, C. A., and De Franco, A. L. (1998) Curr. Biol. 8, 545-553[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
59. Smith, K. G. C., Tarlinton, D. M., Doody, G. M., Hibbs, M. L, and Fearon, D. T. (1998) J. Exp. Med. 187, 807-811[Abstract/Free Full Text]
60. Cornall, R. J., Cyster, J. G., Hibbs, M. L., Dunn, A. R., Otipoby, K. L., Clark, E. A., and Goodnow, C. C. (1998) Immunity 8, 497-508[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
61. Fujimoto, M., Bradney, A. P., Poe, J. C., Steeber, D. A., and Tedder, T. F. (1999) Immunity 11, 191-200[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
62. Dustin, L. B., Plas, D. R., Wong, J., Hu, H. T., Soto, C., Chan, A. C., and Thomas, M. L. (1999) J. Immunol. 162, 2717-2724[Abstract/Free Full Text]
63. Kurosaki, T., Takata, M., Yamanashi, Y., Inazu, T., Taniguchi, T., Yamamoto, T., and Yamamura, H. (1994) J. Exp. Med. 179, 1725-1729[Abstract]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.