Parathyroid Hormone Potentiates Nucleotide-induced [Ca2+]i Release in Rat Osteoblasts Independently of Gq Activation or Cyclic Monophosphate Accumulation

A MECHANISM FOR LOCALIZING SYSTEMIC RESPONSES IN BONE*

Katherine A. BuckleyDagger §, Simon C. WagstaffDagger , Gwen McKay, Alasdair Gaw, Robert A. Hipskind||, Graeme Bilbe**, James A. GallagherDagger , and Wayne B. BowlerDagger

From the Dagger  Human Bone Cell Research Group, Department of Human Anatomy & Cell Biology, University of Liverpool, L69 3GE, United Kingdom,  AstraZeneca Charnwood Bioscience, Bakewell Road, Loughborough, LE115RH, United Kingdom, the || Institut de Genetique Moleculaire de Montpellier, CNRS UMR5535, IFR 24, Montpellier, France, and ** Novartis Pharma AG, CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland

Received for publication, June 28, 2000, and in revised form, December 20, 2000


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The regulation of tissue turnover requires the coordinated activity of both local and systemic factors. Nucleotides exist transiently in the extracellular environment, where they serve as ligands to P2 receptors. Here we report that the localized release of these nucleotides can sensitize osteoblasts to the activity of systemic factors. We have investigated the ability of parathyroid hormone (PTH), a principal regulator of bone resorption and formation, to potentiate signals arising from nucleotide stimulation of UMR-106 clonal rat osteoblasts. PTH receptor activation alone did not lead to [Ca2+]i elevation in these cells, indicating no Gq coupling, however, activation of Gq-coupled P2Y1 receptors resulted in characteristic [Ca2+]i release. PTH potentiated this nucleotide-induced Ca2+ release, independently of Ca2+ influx. PTH-(1-31), which activates only Gs, mimicked the actions of PTH-(1-34), whereas PTH-(3-34), which only activates Gq, was unable to potentiate nucleotide-induced [Ca2+]i release. Despite this coupling of the PTHR to Gs, cAMP accumulation or protein kinase A activation did not contribute to the potentiation. 3-Isobutyl-1-methylxanthine, but not forskolin effectively potentiated nucleotide-induced [Ca2+]i release, however, further experiments proved that cyclic monophosphates were not involved in the potentiation mechanism. Costimulation of UMR-106 cells with P2Y1 agonists and PTH led to increased levels of cAMP response element-binding protein phosphorylation and a synergistic effect was observed on endogenous c-fos gene expression following costimulation. In fact the calcium responsive Ca/cAMP response element of the c-fos promoter alone was effective at driving this synergistic gene expression. These findings demonstrate that nucleotides can provide a targeted response to systemic factors, such as PTH, and have important implications for PTH-induced signaling in bone.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Nucleotides exist in the extracellular microenvironment of bone due to release from damaged cells at sites of injury, or via more controlled nonlytic release (1), where they differentially activate cell surface P2 receptors. Activation of Gq-coupled P2Y receptors leads to [Ca2+]i1 mobilization which has ultimately been found to induce processes including proliferation (2) and differentiation (3) and to modulate osteoblast-induced bone formation (4). The bone matrix synthesizing osteoblasts are thought to express multiple P2Y receptor subtypes (5), with expression profile changing as osteoblasts differentiate (6). The mechanisms that determine focal responsiveness to systemic factors in bone to allow a local tissue turnover, characteristic of the remodeling process, remain unclear. However, our previous observations that coapplication of nucleotides and parathyroid hormone (PTH) can result in synergistic responses in osteoblasts (7) led us to hypothesize that locally released extracellular nucleotides could sensitize surrounding cells to the action of circulating hormones.

Parathyroid hormone is one of the most important systemic regulators of bone and mineral homeostasis. The action of PTH on skeletal cells is complex and can result in the stimulation of both resorption and new bone formation (8, 9). This ability to stimulate coupled, but opposing processes, has been attributed to the nature of the receptor that transduces signals arising from PTH stimulation. The PTH1 receptor belongs to a subgroup of seven transmembrane receptors that include those responsive to calcitonin, secretin, and VIP (10). These receptors are distinct in their ability to couple to both Gs and Gq and hence activate dual signal transduction pathways leading to both cyclic AMP formation and release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores ([Ca2+]i).

The coupling of the PTH receptor to Gs in osteoblasts is well characterized. Activation of the cAMP signaling pathway is responsible for a number of PTH-induced downstream responses, including expression of the c-fos proto-oncogene (11). In addition, the use of truncated PTH fragments in vivo has confirmed that complete N-terminal sequence (vital for Gs activation) is essential to drive the anabolic skeletal effects of PTH (12) and cAMP accumulation is often used as a measure of PTH receptor activation (13). However, the nature of PTH receptor/Gq-coupling and subsequent downstream responses in osteoblasts following activation remains controversial. Both inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate-dependent and independent mechanisms for PTH-induced [Ca2+]i release have been reported (14, 15). To further complicate the issue of PTH-induced [Ca2+]i release, recent studies in cell types other than osteoblasts have demonstrated that while PTH alone is unable to induce [Ca2+]i release, it can strongly potentiate the [Ca2+]i elevations induced by agonists acting at other Gq-coupled G-protein-coupled receptor. The mechanism behind this potentiation remains unclear but has been attributed to G protein subunit interaction or shuttling of calcium between intracellular stores (16).

In a study by Kaplan et al. (17) using rat UMR-106 cells, PTH alone was shown to produce small [Ca2+]i elevations and also potentiated nucleotide-induced [Ca2+]i elevations. However, in contrast to these findings, we previously demonstrated that PTH alone did not elevate [Ca2+]i and was ineffective at potentiating nucleotide-induced responses in the human osteosarcoma cell line SaOS-2 (7). In the same study, however, PTH and nucleotide costimulation of SaOS-2 cells did result in synergistic induction of gene expression.

Considering the observations described above, the current study has addressed: (i) the controversy concerning the ability of PTH to effect [Ca2+]i release in the rat osteosarcoma cell line UMR-106, (ii) the mechanisms by which PTH can potentiate [Ca2+]i release induced by locally released nucleotides, and (iii) whether this potentiated [Ca2+]i response can ultimately drive downstream cellular responses in osteoblasts.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Reagents-- Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM), alpha -modified Eagle's medium (alpha -MEM), Ham's F-12, and fetal calf/bovine serum were purchased from Life Technologies (United Kingdom or France). Human parathyroid hormones (PTH) 1-34 and 1-31, and bovine PTH-(3-34) were purchased from Peninsula Laboratories (UK). Nucleotides, bovine serum albumin, fluo-3 AM, potato apyrase, H-89, IBMX, dibutyryl-cGMP, SKF96365, nitrocellulose membranes, and peroxidase-coupled goat anti-rabbit antibodies were obtained from Sigma (UK). Phospho-CREB and CREB specific antisera were obtained from New England Biolabs (UK). Nitrocellulose membranes and enhanced chemiluminescence reagents were acquired from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (UK) or PerkinElmer Life Sciences (Belgium). Zetabind hybridization membrane was purchased from Cuno (Meriden, CT). Luciferase lysis reagent and luciferase reagent were purchased from Promega (UK). UMR-106 cells were kindly provided by T. J. Martin, Melbourne, Australia.

Cell Culture-- UMR-106 rat osteoblast-like cells were cultured in alpha -MEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 2 mM L-glutamine. The cells were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2. Confluent cells were either induced for subsequent preparation of whole cell extracts or RNA isolation, or harvested upon confluence for Ca2+ release measurements in the FLIPR system (18). The UMR-106 multi CRE c-fos reporter cell line was cultured in Ham's F-12 and DMEM (1:1) under similar conditions.

[Ca2+]i Measurements-- Cells were grown in 225-cm2 vented cap flasks, harvested upon confluence, and resuspended in basal salt solution (BSS) composition (mM): NaCl (125), KCl (5), MgCl2 (1), CaCl2 (1.5), HEPES (25), glucose (5), and 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, pH 7.3. Cells were loaded with 17 µM fluo-3-AM for 1 h at 37 °C with agitation and in the presence of apyrase (2 units/ml), after which cells were washed 3 times in BSS and aliquoted into 96-well black wall, clear base plates at a density of 2.5 × 105 cells/well. These were then centrifuged to obtain a confluent layer of cells on the base of the plate and cells were subsequently washed 4 times in BSS. Ca2+ flux was measured in all 96 wells simultaneously and in real time using a Fluorescent Imaging Plate Reader (FLIPR). When effects of PTH and nucleotides together were studied the cells were incubated for 60 s with PTH prior to exposure to nucleotide. The effects of IBMX and forskolin were assessed by their introduction to the cells 6 min prior to nucleotide addition, H-89 was introduced 10 min before the addition of nucleotides and dibutyryl-cGMP 30 min before nucleotide addition. In all cases [Ca2+]i release was measured for 1 min after nucleotide addition, a measurement of fluorescence being taken every second.

Whole Cell Extract Preparation-- Whole cell extracts were prepared as previously described (19). At the appropriate time point, plates were placed on ice and the cell layer quickly washed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (140 mM NaCl, 10 mM NaPO4, pH 7.3) containing 10 mM NaF and 100 µM Na3VO4. Cells were solubilized in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.05, 50 mM NaCl, 30 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 50 mM NaF, 5 mM ZnCl2, 1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 100 µM Na3VO4, 20 mM beta -glycerophosphate, 10 mM 4-nitrophenyl phosphate, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM benzamidine, 2.5 µg/ml aprotinin, leupeptin, pepstatin, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 200 nM okadaic acid. The cell layer was collected by scraping and lysis completed by vortexing for 60 s. The lysate was clarified by centrifugation at 14,000 × g at 4 °C for 15 min and the protein concentration determined with Bradford's reagent using bovine serum albumin as standard. An aliquot for Western analysis was denatured immediately in 2% SDS, 2% glycerol, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 1% 2-mercaptoethanol and the remaining supernatant stored at -70 °C.

Western Analysis-- 15 µg of whole cell extracts were separated on an 8.5% SDS-polyacrylamide electrophoresis minigel and transferred electrophoretically to a nitrocellulose membrane. The filter was blocked for 1 h at room temperature in 5% (w/v) low fat milk powder-TBST (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20), followed by incubation overnight at 4 °C with the specific antiserum indicated below in blocking buffer. After washing in TBST, the blots were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with peroxidase-coupled goat anti-rabbit antibody, diluted 1/1500 in 5% (w/v) low fat milk powder-TBST. After washing, the immune complexes were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence. The antisera used were: anti-CREB and anti-phospho Ser133 CREB, diluted 1:1000.

RNA Isolation-- Total RNA was extracted from control and stimulated cells according to the protocol of Chomczynski and Sacchi (20). Briefly, cells were lysed in 4 M guanidine thiocyanate, 0.5% Sarkosyl, 0.1 M mercaptoethanol, 25 mM sodium citrate, pH 7.0, followed by acid phenol/chloroform extraction. RNA was stored as a precipitate at -70 °C.

Northern Analysis-- 10 µg of total RNA was denatured and electrophoresed through a 0.8% (w/v) agarose gel containing 3.7% formaldehyde (v:v), followed by transfer to Zetabind hybridization membrane. Blots were prehybridized at 65 °C in 50% formamide, 5 × SSC, 5 × Denhardt's reagent, 1% SDS, 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.8, 5 mg/ml total calf liver RNA, 200 µg of tRNA, and probed with a c-fos riboprobe spanning exons 3 and 4 of the human c-fos gene mixed with a riboprobe derived from the rat gapdh cDNA as previously described (19). Membranes were washed for 30 min at 65 °C with 0.2 × SSC, 1% SDS solution and mRNAs visualized using phosphorstorage technology and autoradiography with Kodak X-AR film and intensifying screens at -70 °C. RNA loading and integrity were measured by UV shadowing of the filter prior to hybridization.

Luciferase Reporter Gene Assays-- Reporter cells were seeded into white 96-well plates (Dynex) at a density of 96,000 cells/well in 50% DMEM, 50% Ham's F-12 containing 10% fetal calf serum. Cells were incubated for 24 h, after which time medium was replaced by 50% DMEM, 50% Ham's F-12 medium containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin and incubated for a further 24 h. Cells were induced for 4 h with ×10 concentration of agonist stock solution prepared in serum-free medium to the final concentrations indicated in Fig. 9. After induction, cells were washed twice in cold phosphate-buffered saline and lysed in luciferase cell culture lysis reagent for 15 min at room temperature (10 µl/well). A microtiter plate luminometer (ML 3000, Dynex Technologies) was set up in the enhanced flash mode (maximum sensitivity, delay time = 2 s, integration time = 10 s). Luciferase reagent (100 µl) was automatically added and light emission was measured every 10 ms during a period of 10 s. Data was recorded as the peak value of relative light units. Treatments were performed in triplicate and the mean fold increase in luciferase activity was calculated relative to mock-induced cells, which was taken as 1-fold.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

UMR-106 Cells Predominantly Express P2Y1 Receptor-- Since osteoblasts have been described to express numerous subtypes of the P2Y family, and previous studies to receptor profile UMR-106 cells have been incomplete, we used the FLIPR system to fully investigate P2Y receptor expression by these cells. The effects of a series of known P2 agonists on [Ca2+]i elevation were measured in fluo-3-loaded cells. The agonist potency order (p[A]50) was as follows: 2-MeSADP (5.27 ± 0.09) > 2-MeSATP (4.89 ± 0.15) > ADP (4.60 ± 0.15) > ATP (4.57 ± 0.11), suggesting that P2Y1 is the predominant P2 receptor expressed by UMR-106 cells (Fig. 1). While AMP, alpha beta MeATP, and UDP were inactive at concentrations between 0.1 and 100 µM (data not shown), UTP evoked a small [Ca2+]i elevation (Fig. 1). This profile differs from that suggested by Kaplan et al. (17) in an earlier study, where predominant functional effects were elicited by P2Y2/Y4 receptor agonists. We have previously reported heterogeneity of P2 receptor expression in populations of primary and clonal osteoblasts (7), a process that appears to be differentiation-dependent (6). Diverse experimental culture methods or passage number may therefore account for the apparent differences in receptor profile between cells in this study and those used in the study of Kaplan et al. (17).


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   UMR-106 cells predominantly express P2Y1 receptors. Fluo-3-loaded UMR-106 cells were treated with various nucleotide agonists over a concentration range of 0.1-100 µM (as indicated on the x axis scale). Ca2+ release was measured according to fluorescence every second for 1 min after nucleotide addition by a FLIPR. Fluorescence is expressed as a percentage of the response to 100 µM 2-MeSADP (n = 4). Errors represent S.D. from the mean.

PTH Potentiates P2Y1 Agonist-induced [Ca2+]i Release-- In a previous study using UMR-106 cells PTH potentiated [Ca2+]i elevations induced by certain nucleotide agonists (17). In one of our earlier studies, however, using the human osteosarcoma cell line SaOS-2, we observed no potentiation of nucleotide-induced [Ca2+]i release following costimulation with PTH (7). To clarify these differences, the effects of human PTH-(1-34) (100 ng/ml), in combination with known nucleotide agonists, on [Ca2+]i were investigated in UMR-106 cells using the FLIPR. In contrast to the earlier study of Kaplan et al. (17), we repeatedly saw no elevation of [Ca2+]i in response to PTH (0.1-500 ng/ml, data not shown). We did, however, observe a striking potentiation to the [Ca2+]i response with all nucleotides tested (Fig. 2 shows just ADP for clarity). A potentiated calcium response was observed when cells were stimulated with UTP and PTH, therefore confirming that P2Y2 receptors are expressed by these cells, albeit at low levels.


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Costimulation of UMR-106 cells with nucleotides and PTH results in potentiated Ca2+ elevation. PTH-(1-34) (100 ng/ml) was introduced to fluo-3-loaded UMR-106 cells 1 min before nucleotide addition (nucleotide concentration range, 0.3 µM to 1 mM). Ca2+ release was measured according to fluorescence every second for 1 min after PTH addition, then for a further 1 min after nucleotide addition. Fluorescence is expressed as a percentage of the response to 1 mM ADP + PTH 100 ng/ml (n = 3). Errors represent S.D. from the mean.

PTH-induced Potentiated Ca2+ Elevations Are Dependent upon Intracellular Store Release-- To begin to investigate the mechanism behind this observed potentiation we wondered whether calcium influx contributed to this response. Again using the FLIPR we found that in the absence of extracellular Ca2+, ADP and PTH costimulation induced a [Ca2+]i response approximately six times greater than that induced by ADP alone (Fig. 3A). However, this response was depressed in comparison to that resulting from the same experiment performed in the presence of extracellular Ca2+ (Fig. 3A). Interestingly, introduction of the receptor-activated calcium channel blocker SKF96365 resulted in an increase in the observed potentiation between ADP and PTH (Fig. 3B). Thus calcium influx is not the major component in the potentiation we observe.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Potentiated Ca2+ elevations are dependent upon intracellular store release. A, Fluo-3 loaded UMR-106 cells were divided into 2 groups, half were washed and resuspended in Ca2+-free BSS, the remaining cells were resuspended in normal BSS. PTH-(1-34) (100 ng/ml) was introduced 1 min before ADP addition (0.3 µM to 1 mM, as shown on the x axis scale) to all cells. [Ca2+]i release was recorded as a fluorescence reading by the FLIPR every second for 1 min after PTH addition, and every second for 1 min after ADP addition (n = 3). B, again fluo-3-loaded UMR-106 cells were divided, half were resuspended in BSS containing SFK96365 (30 µM), remaining cells were resuspended in normal BSS. Measurements were taken as for A (n = 3).

Truncated PTH Peptides Act Differentially to Potentiate ADP-induced [Ca2+]i Release-- To further elucidate the mechanisms behind the observed potentiated [Ca2+]i release we used truncated forms of the PTH peptide, which have previously been reported to have selective stimulatory effects upon the G-proteins that couple second messenger signaling pathways to the PTH receptor. It has been reported that stimulation of the PTH receptor by PTH-(1-34) results in activation of both Gq and Gs and therefore utilizes both PKC and adenylyl cyclase to initiate signaling cascades (10). We report here that PTH-(1-31) (100 ng/ml), which stimulates adenylyl cyclase but not PKC (21), is able to potentiate ADP-induced Ca2+ responses as effectively as the full-length peptide (PTH-(1-34)) (Fig. 4A). In contrast, PTH-(3-34) (100 ng/ml) which does not activate adenylyl cyclase (22) was unable to potentiate the [Ca2+]i release induced by ADP (Fig. 4A). To confirm that this peptide was functionally interacting with the PTH receptor it was introduced in combination with ADP and the active peptides, PTH-(1-34) or -(1-31). PTH-(3-34) was shown to act as a functional antagonist at the PTH receptor as it depressed the [Ca2+]i release induced by ADP in combination with either PTH-(1-34) or PTH-(1-31) (Fig. 4B).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Truncated PTH peptides act differentially to potentiate ADP-induced [Ca2+]i release. A, PTH-(1-31) (100 ng/ml), PTH-(3-34) (100 ng/ml), and PTH-(1-34) (100 ng/ml) were assessed for their ability to potentiate ADP-induced (0.3 µM TO 1 mM) [Ca2+]i release in UMR-106 cells. All PTH peptides were introduced to fluo-3-loaded cells in the FLIPR 1 min before nucleotide addition. Ca2+ release was measured according to fluorescence every second for 1 min after PTH addition, then for a further 1 min after nucleotide addition. Fluorescence is expressed as a percentage of the response to 1 mM ADP + PTH-(1-34) 100 ng/ml (n = 4). B, PTH-(3-34) (100 ng/ml) was introduced in combination with both PTH-(1-31) (100 ng/ml) and PTH-(1-34) (100 ng/ml) to UMR-106 cells. ADP was added 1 min after PTH addition and fluorescence was measured as for A (n = 3).

H-89 Does Not Inhibit PTH/Nucleotide-potentiated [Ca2+]i Release-- As a main downstream target for activated adenylyl cyclase pathways, we next investigated the potential role of PKA in driving potentiated [Ca2+]i release in UMR-106 cells. Preincubation of UMR-106 cells with the PKA inhibitor H-89 (1-100 µM) did not affect potentiated [Ca2+]i release induced by ADP and PTH, indicating that PKA activity is not necessary to initiate the potentiation (Table I). H-89 was inhibitory in these cells, since it blocked PTH-induced phosphorylation of CREB on Ser133, the residue phosphorylated by active PKA (Fig. 5).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
H-89 does not depress ADP/PTH-induced potentiated Ca2+ elevations
H-89 (1-100 µM) was introduced to fluo-3-loaded UMR-106 cells 10 min before ADP (100 µM) and PTH (100 ng/ml) addition. Ca2+ release was measured according to fluorescence every 30 s for 10 min after H-89 addition, then every second for a further 1 min after ADP/PTH addition. Fluorescence is expressed as a percentage of the response to 100 µM ADP + 100 ng/ml PTH. H-89 had no effect on the potentiation at any concentration tested, figures show effects of 10 µM H-89 (n = 3).


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   H-89 inhibits PTH-induced CREB phosphorylation in UMR-106 cells. To confirm the bioactivity of H-89 quiescent cells were treated with PTH (100 ng/ml) alone or in combination with this compound (10 µM). H-89 was introduced either 15 or 30 min before lysing cells, as indicated above each lane, PTH was introduced 10 min before lysing in all lanes. Whole cell extracts were prepared, and 15 µg of protein per sample ran on an 8.5% SDS-polyacrylamide electrophoresis minigel. After transfer to a nitrocellulose membrane the blot was immunodetected with anti-phospho-Ser133 CREB antiserum, followed by peroxidase-coupled anti-rabbit antiserum and detection using enhanced chemiluminescence. The blot was stripped and re-probed with anti-CREB antiserum to confirm the presence of similar levels of protein in each lane. The absence of a signal for phospho-CREB in lanes treated with H-89 confirms that this compound does inhibit PKA in this cell type.

Forskolin and IBMX Have Differential Effects on ADP-induced [Ca2+]i Release-- The results above showed that potentiation occurs with a PTH peptide that activates a signaling pathway involving adenylyl cyclase but not PKA. To assess whether elevated cAMP could drive potentiated [Ca2+]i release, cells were costimulated with ADP and the cell permeable adenylyl cyclase activator, forskolin (50 µM), in the absence of extracellular calcium. Forskolin was unable to potentiate ADP-induced calcium responses (Table II). Forskolin alone was shown to elevate intracellular cAMP levels in these cells and to induce CREB phoshorylation via PKA phosphorylation (data not shown). We also tested the ability of the nonspecific phosphodiesterase inhibitor, IBMX (1 mM) to potentiate ADP-induced [Ca2+]i release. In contrast to forskolin, IBMX effectively potentiated ADP-induced [Ca2+]i release (Table II).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
IBMX, but not forskolin can potentiate nucleotide-induced [Ca2+]i release
Forskolin (50 µM), IBMX (1 mM), and PTH (100 ng/ml) were introduced to fluo-3-loaded UMR-106 cells 6 min before ADP addition (ADP concentration range, 0.3 µM to 1 mM). Ca2+ release was measured according to fluorescence every second for 1 min after ADP addition. Fluorescence is expressed as a percentage of the response to 100 µM ADP + 100 ng/ml PTH (n = 3).

cGMP Does Not Potentiate ADP-induced [Ca2+]i Release-- Since the results obtained with forskolin and IBMX suggested that accumulation of cGMP, downstream of the activated PTH receptor, may be causing the potentiation of ADP-induced [Ca2+]i levels, we costimulated cells with ADP and the cell permeable cGMP analogue, dibutyryl-cGMP (300 µM), in the absence of extracellular calcium. Dibutyryl-cGMP was unable to potentiate ADP-induced [Ca2+]i elevations (Fig. 6), eliminating accumulation of this cyclic monophosphate as a possible mechanism of potentiation. Dibutyryl-cGMP alone produced no [Ca2+]i elevation (data not shown).


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   cGMP accumulation is not involved in the mechanism resulting in potentiated [Ca2+]i elevation. The cGMP analogue dibutyryl-cGMP (300 µM) was introduced to fluo-3-loaded cells 30 min before nucleotide addition (nucleotide concentration range, 0.3 µM to 1 mM). Ca2+ release was measured according to fluorescence every second for 1 min after nucleotide addition. Fluorescence is expressed as a percentage of the response to 1 mM ADP + PTH 100 ng/ml (n = 3). Errors represent S.D. from the mean. FCS, fetal calf serum.

PTH and P2Y1 Receptor Agonists Induce Phosphorylation of the Transcription Factor CREB-- Phosphorylation of CREB on Ser133 is strongly linked to signaling-induced transcriptional activation. Ser133 is a substrate for PKA but also for kinases activated by elevated intracellular calcium. We investigated whether ADP and PTH alone or in combination induced CREB phosphorylation in UMR-106 cells. We performed Western analysis of whole cell extracts using antisera directed against CREB phosphorylated on Ser133. The P2Y1 agonist ADP (100 µM) induced low CREB activation following 15 min stimulation, while PTH-(1-34) (100 ng/ml) gave rise to a robust transcription factor phosphorylation. In combination, however, agonists induced levels of CREB activation greater than those seen with either agonist alone. Quantitative values for CREB and phospho-CREB were obtained by densitometric analysis (Fig. 7).


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   ADP and PTH stimulate CREB phosphorylation in UMR-106 cells. Quiescent UMR-106 cells were stimulated with 100 µM ADP and 100 ng/ml PTH alone or in combination as indicated above each lane. After 15 min cells were lysed and Western analysis for CREB phosphorylation was performed as described in the legend to Fig. 5. Following densitometry, phospho-CREB levels were expressed as a ratio of CREB and then expressed as a percentage increase over vehicle as indicated below each lane. FCS, fetal calf serum.

PTH and P2Y1 Receptor Agonists Synergistically Induce the Endogenous c-fos Gene-- To determine the impact of the observed potentiated calcium response on gene expression we measured the effects of P2Y1 agonists and PTH on the levels of endogenous c-fos transcription in UMR-106 cells. This proto-oncogene is of particular relevance when studying osteoblasts as it has been implicated in many of the processes that govern skeletal tissue remodeling (23). Stimulation of quiescent UMR-106 cells with the P2Y1 agonists ADP and 2-MeSATP (10 µM) for 45 min had a very weak effect on c-fos mRNA expression, as assessed by Northern analysis (Fig. 8). PTH alone led to a more robust c-fos induction that was significantly enhanced by costimulation with PTH and P2Y1 agonists (Fig. 8).


View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   P2Y1 receptor agonists and PTH induce synergistic endogenous c-fos gene expression in UMR-106 cells. UMR-106 cells were serum-starved and then stimulated for 45 min with 10 µM ADP, 2-MeSATP, and/or PTH 100 ng/ml as indicated above each lane. 10 µg of total RNA for each sample was analyzed by Northern blotting and hybridization with c-fos, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) riboprobes mixed 15:1. The c-fos signal in each lane was standardized to the GAPDH internal control, and the level of induction relative to control expressed numerically below each lane.

The Ca/CRE Located at Position -60 in the c-fos Promoter Is Sufficient to Drive Synergistic Gene Expression-- The Ca/CRE element in the c-fos promoter responds to both cAMP and certain types of calcium signals. Following the observation that nucleotides and PTH could potentiate [Ca2+]i release in UMR-106 cells, we wondered whether activation of the Ca/CRE alone may be sufficient to generate the observed synergy on c-fos gene expression. To assess this we utilized UMR-106 cells stably transfected with luciferase reporters driven by a truncated Ca/CRE promoter element. Costimulation of stable pools of transfected UMR-106 cells with PTH and P2Y1 nucleotide agonists resulted in synergistic luciferase activity (Fig. 9). These data show that this calcium responsive region of the fos promoter is sufficient to drive synergistic gene expression, and that the strong calcium signal induced by ADP and PTH costimulation converges on this promoter element.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   PTH and nucleotides induce synergistic c-fos gene expression via the Ca/CRE promoter alone. UMR-106 cells stably transfected with the fos Ca/CRE promoter-luciferase reporter were serum starved and then induced for 4 h with 100 µM ADP and/or PTH 10-8 M. Luciferase activity was measured by a microtiter plate luminometer in the enhanced flash mode (n = 3). Error bars indicate the S.D.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The main findings of this study are: 1) the rat osteosarcoma cell line UMR-106 primarily expresses P2Y1 receptors coupled to [Ca2+]i mobilization, 2) PTH does not couple to Gq in UMR-106 cells, but strongly potentiates P2Y1 agonist-induced [Ca2+]i release in these cells, 3) this potentiation is primarily dependent upon calcium release from intracellular stores and relies upon the activated PTH receptor coupling to Gs, 4) potentiated [Ca2+]i release occurs independently of cAMP/PKA pathways or cGMP accumulation, 5) PTH and nucleotide costimulation potentiates phosphorylation of the transcription factor CREB and leads to a synergistic induction of the endogenous c-fos gene, and 6) the fos Ca/CRE alone is sufficient to obtain a similar synergistic induction in the context of reporter genes stably transfected into UMR-106 cells.

An important observation from these studies was that PTH-(1-34), over a wide dose range, was unable to elevate [Ca2+]i in UMR-106 cells, demonstrating that Gq is not activated in response to PTH in this cell type (data not shown). This is in contradiction to Kaplan et al. (17) who reported that PTH did induce a small [Ca2+]i elevation. Earlier studies also confirm that the effect of PTH on [Ca2+]i mobilization in osteoblasts is controversial, one group finding no effect (24), but others reporting various increases (25, 26). A possible explanation for these very different reports may be the presence of ATP in the culture medium due to cell lysis. We have also demonstrated that nucleotides can be constitutively released nonlytically from osteoblasts, and that this may be positively regulated by fluid flow (1). Therefore one consequence of agitating cell suspensions will be to increase release of ATP, with the ability to modulate PTH-induced responses. Systems fitting this criteria have been used in studies that report Gq coupling in UMR-106 cells in response to PTH. To avoid this problem, we routinely treated the cells with apyrase to eliminate extracellular nucleotides released in this manner. It is also worth noting that other studies have observed a Ca2+ response to PTH in a subset of cells within a population, suggesting that this response in osteoblasts is limited by the state of differentiation of the cells (27, 28).

Our studies have shown huge potentiations of [Ca2+]i in response to nucleotide and PTH receptor costimulation which is consistent with previous findings (17). This observed potentiation was primarily dependent on intracellular store release, although the potentiation was slightly depressed in the absence of extracellular Ca2+ (Fig. 3A). Interestingly, an increased potentiation was observed in the presence of the receptor-gated Ca2+ channel blocker SFK96365, (Fig. 3B), again supporting the theory that intracellular Ca2+ store release, rather than Ca2+ influx was primarily responsible for potentiation. These observations also discount the possibility that potentiated cytosolic calcium levels reflect the ability of PTH/cAMP-mediated stimulation of membrane channels, since this process is dependent upon extracellular Ca2+ influx (29).

Although we found no evidence for Gq coupling to the PTH receptor in UMR-106 cells, we utilized truncated PTH peptides to confirm that Gs activation was vital in driving the potentiation mechanism. As expected, PTH-(1-31), which activates Galpha s independently of Gq, was able to potentiate ADP-induced [Ca2+]i release (Fig. 4A). Conversely PTH-(3-34), which reportedly activates Gq (22), was ineffective in this respect, despite its capacity to functionally interact with the PTH receptor, shown by its ability to act as an antagonist to both PTH-(1-31) and PTH-(1-34) (Fig. 4B). These data were suggestive of the involvement of cAMP/PKA driven pathways in potentiating [Ca2+]i release. Intracellular cross-talk may occur between cAMP and [Ca2+]i driven pathways, cAMP can elicit [Ca2+]i release via PKA phosphorylation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor on serines 1755 and 1589. Kinetically, it seemed unlikely that this mechanism drove PTH potentiation of ADP-induced [Ca2+]i release in our system, however, we investigated this possibility using the metabolic PKA inhibitor H-89. While H-89 effectively inhibited CREB phosphorylation following PTH stimulation (Fig. 5), similar concentrations were unable to depress [Ca2+]i release in response to PTH and ADP (Table I).

Although activated PKA appeared not to be essential for a potentiated [Ca2+]i release the possibility still remained that elevated cAMP, through a PKA-independent mechanism, could play a role. This was investigated by costimulating UMR-106 cells with ADP and the adenylyl cyclase activator forskolin. In the absence of extracellular calcium the inability of forskolin to mimic PTH-induced responses strongly suggested that potentiated [Ca2+]i release occurs independently of cAMP accumulation. Unexpectedly, the nonspecific phosphodiesterase inhibitor IBMX potentiated ADP-induced [Ca2+]i release in a manner similar to PTH (Table II), suggesting that other cyclic monophosphates may be involved in the potentiation mechanism in osteoblasts. In contrast, Short and Taylor (16), using PTH1 receptor-transfected human kidney cells, were unable to potentiate carbachol-induced calcium responses with IBMX, and in fact, inhibited PTH-potentiated carbachol responses with this phosphodiesterase inhibitor (16). To clarify this apparent contradiction, and to further elucidate the potentiation mechanism, UMR-106 cells were costimulated with ADP and the cGMP analogue, dibutyryl-cGMP. cGMP was unable to potentiate ADP-induced Ca2+ elevations in these cells (Fig. 6). The discrepancies between the results obtained by Short and Taylor (16) and our own, may perhaps be explained by the fact that in some cell types IBMX has been found to elevate intracellular calcium (30, 31), whereas in other cell types, cGMP can dampen inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor-driven responses (32).

Our findings showing that neither elevated cAMP nor cGMP are able to potentiate nucleotide-induced [Ca2+]i elevations and the inability of IBMX to potentiate carbachol responses in kidney cells demonstrate that an as yet unidentified mechanism is responsible for [Ca2+]i potentiation observed upon dual activation of two separate G-protein-coupled receptors. Other investigators have suggested that PTH may regulate Ca2+ mobilization by facilitating translocation of Ca2+ between discrete intracellular stores, thereby regulating the Ca2+ pool available to receptors linked to inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate formation (16). Alternatively, it has been suggested that a direct G-protein interaction may account for potentiated [Ca2+]i release (33).

The significance of this calcium potentiation can be seen in its effects on transcription factor activation and gene expression. The transcription factor CREB binds the cyclic AMP response element (CRE) and initiates transcription in response to a number of extracellular signals, including elevated [Ca2+]i. Phospho-CREB plays a key role in signaling-driven activation of the proto-oncogene c-fos which in turn has been strongly implicated in driving many osteoblast functions, including proliferation and differentiation (34, 35). PTH and ADP costimulation of UMR-106 cells resulted in increased levels of phospho-CREB (Fig. 7), and potentiation of endogenous c-fos mRNA expression (Fig. 8). Furthermore, using UMR-106 reporter cells, stably transfected with a truncated c-fos promoter consisting only of the Ca/CRE, we have demonstrated that this promoter element alone is sufficient to drive synergistic c-fos expression (Fig. 9). In contrast, in a previous study using the human osteosarcoma cell line SaOS-2, we found that both the Ca/CRE and the serum response element of the c-fos promoter were required to drive the same synergy (7). This was consistent with an inability of PTH to potentiate nucleotide-induced [Ca2+]i release in SaOS-2 cells. It would therefore appear that multiple pathways, both calcium dependent and independent, exist to couple P2Y1 and PTH receptor coactivation to synergistic gene expression in osteoblasts.

It has never been clear how systemic PTH can initiate remodeling that is confined to a small area of bone. These studies suggest a mechanism whereby the localized release of nucleotides, via lytic and nonlytic mechanisms, can sensitize cells to surrounding systemic factors such as PTH. This costimulation appears to have profound effects on osteoblastic cells, initiating calcium-activated pathways that ultimately result in transcription factor activation and synergistic induction of gene expression.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by an AstraZeneca studentship (to K. A. B.), the North West Cancer Research Fund (to S. C. W.) the Association pour la Recherche pour le Cancer (to R. A. H.), and the Arthritis Research Campaign (to W. B. B.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Tel.: 44-151-794-5505; Fax: 44-151-794-5478.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 21, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M005672200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: [Ca2+]i, intracellular [Ca2+]; PTH, parathyroid hormone, where not specified PTH = PTH-(1-34); FLIPR, fluorescent imaging plate reader; BSS, basal salt solution; 2-MeSATP, 2-methylthioadenosine 5'-triphosphate; 2-MeSADP, 2-methylthioadenosine 5'-diphosphate; IBMX, 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine; dibutyryl-cGMP, N2,2'-O-dibutyrylguanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate; CREB, cAMP response element-binding protein; Ca/CRE, calcium and cAMP response element; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Bowler, W. B., Tattersall, J. A., Hussein, R., Dixon, C. J., Cobbold, P. H., and Gallagher, J. A. (1998) Bone 22, 3S
2. Dixon, J. C., Bowler, W. B., Littlewood-Evans, A., Dillon, J. P., Bilbe, G., Sharpe, G. R., and Gallagher, J. A. (1999) Br. J. Pharmacol. 127, 1680-1686[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Koshiba, M., Apasov, S., Sverdlov, V., Chen, P., Erb, L., Turner, J. T., Weisman, G. A., and Sitkovsky, M. V. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 831-836[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Jones, S. J., Gray, C., Boyde, A., and Burnstock, G. (1997) Bone 21, 393-399[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Reimer, W. J., and Dixon, S. J. (1992) Am. J. Physiol. 263, C1040-C1048[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Dixon, J. C., Bowler, W. B., Walsh, C. A., and Gallagher, J. A. (1997) Br. J. Pharmacol 120, 777-780[Abstract]
7. Bowler, W. B., Dixon, C. J., Halleux, C., Maier, R., Bilbe, G., Fraser, W. D., Gallagher, J. A., and Hipskind, R. A. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 14315-14324[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Raisz, L. G. (1965) Nature 197, 1015-1017
9. Dempster, D. W., Cosman, F., Parisien, M., and Shen, V. (1993) Endocrine Rev. 14, 690-709[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Abou-Samra, A. B., Juppner, H., Force, T., Freeman, M. W., Kong, X-F., Schipani, E., Urena, P., Richards, J., Bonventre, J. V., Potts, J. T., Jr., Kronenberg, H. M., and Segre, G. V. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 2732-2736[Abstract]
11. Tyson, D. R., Swarthout, J. T., and Partridge, N. C. (1999) Endocrinology 140, 1255-1261[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. ArmamentoVillareal, R., Ziambaras, K., AbbasiJarhomi, S. H., Dimarogonas, A., Halstead, L., Fausto, A., Avioli, L. V., and Civitelli, R. (1997) J. Bone Min. Res. 12, 384-392
13. Du, P. F., Seitz, P. K., and Cooper, C. W. (2000) Endocrine 12, 25-33[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Dunlay, R., and Hruska, K. (1990) Am. J. Physiol. 258, F223-F231[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Tong, Y., Zull, J., and Yu, L. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 8183-8191[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Short, A. D., and Taylor, C. T. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 1807-1813[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Kaplan, A. D., Reimer, W. J., Feldman, R. D., and Dixon, S. J. (1995) Endocrinology 136, 1674-1684[Abstract]
18. Kuntzweiler, T. A., Arneric, S. P., and Donnelly-Roberts, D. L. (1998) Drug Dev. Res. 44, 14-20[CrossRef]
19. Hipskind, R. A., Baccarini, M., and Nordheim, A. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 6219-6231[Abstract]
20. Chomczynski, P., and Sacchi, N. (1987) Anal. Biochem. 162, 156-161[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Jouishomme, H., Whitfield, J. F., Gagnon, L., Maclean, S., Isaacs, R., Chakravarthy, B., Durkin, J., Neugebauer, W., Willick, G., and Rixon, R. H. (1994) J. Bone Min. Res. 9, 943-949[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Goltzman, D., Peytremann, A., Callahan, E., Tregear, G. W., and Potts, J. T., Jr. (1975) J. Biol. Chem. 250, 3199-3203[Abstract]
23. Grigoriadis, A. E., Wang, Z-Q., Cecchini, M. G., Hofstetter, W., Felix, R., Fleish, H. A., and Wagner, E. F. (1994) Science 266, 443-448[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Boland, C. J., Fried, R. M., and Tashjian, A. H., Jr. (1986) Endocrinology 118, 980-989[Abstract]
25. Donahue, H. J., Fryer, M. J., Erikson, E. F., and Heath, H. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 13522-13527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Yamaguchi, D. T., Hahn, T. J., Iida-Klein, A., Kleeman, C. R., and Muallem, S. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 7711-7718[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Schõfl, C., Cuthbertson, K. S. R., Gallagher, J. A., Pennington, S. R., Cobbold, P. H., Brabant, G., Hesch, R-D., and Von Zur Muhlen, A. (1991) Biochem. J. 274, 15-20[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Civitelli, R., Fujimori, A., Bernier, S. M., Warlow, P. M., Goltzman, D., Hruska, K. A., and Avioli, L. V. (1992) Endocrinology 130, 2392-2400[Abstract]
29. Luini, A., Lewis, D., Guild, S., Corda, D., and Axelrod, J. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 8034-8038[Abstract]
30. Pannabecker, T., and Orchard, I. (1987) Brain Res. 423, 13-22[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Dasarathy, Y., and Fanburg, B. L. (1988) J. Cell. Physiol. 137, 179-184[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Komalavilas, P., and Lincoln, T. M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 8701-8707[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Jimenez, A. I., Castro, E., Mirabet, M., Franco, R., Delicado, E. G., and Miras-Portugal, M. T. (1999) Glia 26, 119-128[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Lee, K., Deeds, J. D., Chiba, S., Un-No, M., Bond, A. T., and Segre, G. V. (1994) Endocrinology 134, 441-450[Abstract]
35. Stein, G. S., Lian, J. B., Stein, J. L., Van W.ijnen, A. J., and Montecino, M. (1996) Physiol. Rev. 76, 593-629[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.