From the Zentrum für Ultrastrukturforschung und
Ludwig Boltzmann-Institut für Molekulare Nanotechnologie,
Universität für Bodenkultur Wien, A-1180 Wien, Austria, the
§ Zentrum für Angewandte Genetik, Universität
für Bodenkultur Wien, A-1190 Wien, Austria, and the
¶ Institut für Chemie, Universität für
Bodenkultur Wien, A-1190 Wien, Austria
Received for publication, November 3, 2000
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The glycan repeats of the surface layer
glycoprotein of Aneurinibacillus thermoaerophilus
L420-91T contain D-rhamnose and
3-acetamido-3,6-dideoxy-D-galactose, both of which are also
constituents of lipopolysaccharides of Gram-negative plant and human
pathogenic bacteria. The two genes required for biosynthesis of the
nucleotide-activated precursor GDP-D-rhamnose, gmd and rmd, were cloned, sequenced, and
overexpressed in Escherichia coli. The corresponding
enzymes Gmd and Rmd were purified to homogeneity, and functional
studies were performed. GDP-D-mannose dehydratase (Gmd)
converted GDP-D-mannose to
GDP-6-deoxy-D-lyxo-4-hexulose, with
NADP+ as cofactor. The reductase Rmd catalyzed the second
step in the pathway, namely the reduction of the keto-intermediate to
the final product GDP-D-rhamnose using both NADH and NADPH
as hydride donor. The elution behavior of the intermediate and end
product was analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy was used to identify the structure of
the final product of the reaction sequence as
GDP- S-layers1 are
two-dimensional protein crystals that form the outermost cell surface
component of many archaea and bacteria (1, 2). Frequently, these
S-layer proteins are glycosylated (3, 4). The S-layer glycoprotein of
the Gram-positive, thermophilic bacterium Aneurinibacillus
thermoaerophilus L420-91T, a member of the
Bacillus/Clostridium group, is composed of identical repeats of
D-rhamnose and
3-acetamido-3,6-dideoxy-D-galactose units (5). The
principal architecture of S-layer glycoproteins resembles that of the
LPS of Gram-negative bacteria (6). Both glycoconjugates exhibit a
tripartite structural organization, where usually conserved core
regions connect a glycan chain, composed of repeating units, either
with the S-layer polypeptide or the lipid A of LPS. It has been
proposed that comparable pathways are used for the biosynthesis of
these similar glycoconjugates (3). D-Rhamnose is a rare
sugar that is also constituent of the LPS of plant pathogens like
Xanthomonas campestris (7), Pseudomonas syringae
(8) and of human pathogens, most importantly Pseudomonas
aeruginosa (9), Burkholderia cepacia (10),
Campylobacter fetus (11), and Helicobacter pylori
(12). Recently, a biosynthetic pathway for the nucleotide-activated
form of D-rhamnose has been proposed (13). According to
this model, GDP-D-mannose is converted to
GDP-D-rhamnose in two reaction steps (Fig.
1). The first step is the dehydration of
GDP-D-mannose (GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase, Gmd), which
leads to the unstable intermediate
GDP-6-deoxy-D-lyxo-4-hexulose (14, 15). This
keto-derivative is further converted to the final product
GDP-D-rhamnose by the action of
GDP-6-deoxy-D-lyxo-4-hexulose reductase
(Rmd).
-D-rhamnose. This is the first characterization of a
GDP-6-deoxy-D-lyxo-4-hexulose reductase. In
addition, Gmd has been shown to be a bifunctional enzyme with both
dehydratase and reductase activities. So far, no enzyme catalyzing
these two types of reactions has been identified. Both Gmd and Rmd are
members of the SDR (short chain
dehydrogenase/reductase) protein family.
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
View larger version (9K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Schematic representation of the biosynthesis
pathway for GDP-D-rhamnose.
The first reaction, which is particularly important, because it is also part of the GDP-L-fucose biosynthetic pathway, has been recently described for Escherichia coli (16), Arabidopsis thaliana (17), and Homo sapiens (18). Gmd is a unique member of the short chain dehydrogenase/reductase protein family (19-21). This diverse protein family consists of enzymes that function not only as reductases or dehydrogenases but also as epimerases, isomerases, and dehydratases (22, 23). Among the sugar-modifying enzymes, the crystal structures of UDP-glucose 4-epimerase from E. coli (24) and H. sapiens (25), of GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-D-mannose epimerase/reductase (26, 27), of Gmd (21), and of ADP-D-glycero-D-manno-heptose epimerase (28) have been reported, recently. Several other enzymes such as RmlB and RmlD (29) were added to this protein family, based on alignments of protein sequences. A strictly conserved residue throughout this family is Tyr157 (in Gmd of E. coli), the residue deprotonating the C-4 hydroxyl group of the sugar moiety (21). Another highly conserved residue, Lys161, lowers the pKa of Tyr157, making catalysis of the oxidation reaction possible. Together, these two residues form the YXXXK motif typical, but not unique, for the SDR protein family (20). Two further residues, Thr133 and Glu135, complete the catalytic residues in the active center of E. coli Gmd. Another set of conserved residues, found near the N terminus in the Rossman-fold (30), is responsible for the binding of NAD(P)+. Other residues important for substrate or cofactor binding are spread throughout the protein sequence.
For the second reaction step, the reduction of the hexulose, in
P. aeruginosa an ORF directly upstream of the gmd
gene has been proposed to code for the reductase Rmd. The corresponding ORF has been deleted, which results in mutants that lack A-band LPS,
which is composed exclusively of D-rhamnose residues (31). So far, no functional studies of the enzyme have been performed. This
second step in GDP-D-rhamnose biosynthesis seems to be a perfect target for enzyme inhibition to prevent the synthesis of
D-rhamnose-containing LPS structures in pathogenic
bacteria. Such an approach would lead to a promising therapeutic
alternative to the careless use of antibiotics. Crystallographic
analysis of the Rmd protein would help to corroborate the functional
results and could lead to the design of enzyme inhibitors via molecular modeling. In this report we characterize for the first time the biosynthetic reactions involved in the conversion of
GDP-D-mannose to GDP-D-rhamnose.
![]() |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Materials--
GDP-D-mannose, NAD+,
NADH, NADPH, and dithiothreitol were obtained from Sigma.
Glutathione (reduced form) was from Merck, and NADP+ was
obtained from Gerbu Biotechnik GmbH (Gailberg, Germany). GSTrap, HiTrap
Chelating, HiPrep Desalting, MonoQ HR5/5, and Sephadex G-10 were
purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. The GATEWAY system was
obtained from Life Technologies, Inc. GEM-12 was from Promega
(Madison, WI). Ultrafree-MC 10000 ultrafiltration cartridges were
purchased from Millipore (Bedford, MA). pBCKS was obtained from
Stratagene (La Jolla, CA).
Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions--
A.
thermoaerophilus L420-91T (32, 33) was grown in SVIII
medium at 55 °C. E. coli DH5 (K-12 F
80d lacZ
M15 endA1 recA1 hsdR17
(rK
mK
) supE44 thi-1 gyrA96
relA1
(lacZYA-argF) U169) (Life Technologies, Inc.)
and E. coli TG1 (supE thi-1
(lac-proAB)
(mcrB-hsdSM)5 (rK
mK
) [F' traD36 proAB
lacIqZ
M15]) (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) were used for plasmid
propagation. For enzyme overexpression E. coli BL21-SI
(F
ompB
hsdSB(rB
mB
) gal dcm endA1
proUp::T7
RNAP::malQ-lacZ Tets) (Life
Technologies, Inc.) was used. Media were supplemented with ampicillin,
kanamycin, or chloramphenicol at concentrations of 100, 50, and 34 µg/ml, respectively, when required. Cells were grown at 30 or
37 °C, with or without agitation.
Analytical Techniques-- Nucleotide-activated sugars were analyzed on a CarboPac PA-1 column (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA) using the method of Palmieri et al. (34) with slight modifications. Monosaccharides were analyzed on a CarboPac PA-1 as described previously (6). SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was performed according to the original method of Laemmli (35) using slight modifications. Gels were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250. Protein concentrations were determined by the method of Bradford (36).
Sequence Analysis-- BLAST (basic logic alignment search tool; Ref. 37) and MultAlin (38) were used to analyze nucleotide and protein sequences. For protein family analysis, the Prosite data base was used (39).
DNA Manipulations, Polymerase Chain Reaction, and DNA Sequencing-- All standard DNA recombinant procedures were performed according to the methods described by Sambrook et al. (40) or as recommended by the corresponding manufacturer. PCR was carried out using a PCR Sprint thermocycler (Hybaid, Ashford, UK). DNA sequencing was performed either by MWG BIOTECH (Ebersberg, Germany) or AGOWA (Berlin, Germany).
Construction of a Phage Library and Identification of a gmd- and
rmd-containing Clone--
A genomic library of A. thermoaerophilus strain L420-91T was prepared by
cloning size fractionated, partially Sau3A-digested DNA that was
partially filled in with dGTP and dATP, into the phage vector
GEM-12. This vector was cut with XhoI and partially filled in with dTTP and dCTP. The presence of clones containing the gmd sequence was confirmed by PCR using the primer pair
(5'-TTTCCTGCTGATTTTTGC-3' and 5'-CAATATCCGAATCTTCCTACG-3') and
phage lysate as template. A small, PCR-positive subpool was screened by
plaque-lifting using a 32P-labeled gmd PCR
fragment as probe. A clone (
BK1) containing gmd and about
10 kilobases of downstream DNA was converted into a plasmid suitable
for sequencing by in vivo recombination in yeast (41). In
brief, the vector pPGA1851,2
which contains 450 base pairs of DNA from the left arm of phage
and
390 base pairs of its right arm, is linearized in between and
cotransformed into yeast with a crude preparation of the respective phage
using a simple lithium transformation protocol (42). About 10% of the yeast transformants contain the recombination product
formed in vivo. The resulting (broad host range) plasmid p
BK1, containing the insert of the
clone, was recovered from yeast, introduced into E. coli by electroporation, and used
subsequently for sequencing.
Plasmid Construction-- Oligonucleotide primers for the amplification of DNA fragments containing either the gmd or rmd gene were designed with attB1 or attB2 sites for the insertion into the GATEWAY donor vector pDONR201 (Life Technologies, Inc.) by homologous recombination. Primers with the following sequences were synthesized by Life Technologies, Inc.: GMDA1 (forward), 5'-attB1-GCGAGAATCTCTACTTCCAAGGAATGAAAAAAGCTTTAATTCC-3'; GMDA2 (reverse), 5'-attB2-CTGCAACTCCAGTGATTAGG-3'; RMDA1 (forward), 5'-attB1-GCGAGAATCTCTACTTCCAAGGAATGAGAGCCCTAATCACTGG-3'; and RMDA2 (reverse), 5'-attB2-CCTCTGTATCTCCAAATTGC-3'. attB1 and attB2 are the minimal 25-base pair sequences required for efficient homologous recombination.
The PCR products were cloned into pDONR201, and the resulting plasmids gGMD1 and gRMD1 were used to transfer the gene sequences into pDEST15 (GST fusion) or pDEST17 (His fusion) via homologous recombination. The corresponding plasmids gGMD2 (GST fusion), gGMD3 (His fusion) and gRMD3 (His fusion) were used for overexpression of the fusion proteins in E. coli BL21-SI.
Enzyme Purifications--
Cells carrying gGMD3 were grown at
37 °C to an optical density at 600 nm of 0.5 in 1 liter of culture
volume, and expression was performed for 3 h. Cells harboring the
GST fusion plasmid gGMD2 were grown at 30 °C to an optical density
at 600 nm of 0.5 in 1.4-liter culture volume, and expression was
carried out overnight. A 1.4-liter culture harboring gRMD2 was grown at
37 °C to an optical density of 0.5, and expression was done for
4 h. Production of the fusion proteins was induced by the addition
of NaCl to a final concentration of 0.3 M. The cells were
disrupted on ice by ultrasonication, cell debris was pelleted by
centrifugation at 31,000 × g, and membrane fractions
were removed by ultracentrifugation at 331,000 × g.
Purifications using HiTrap Chelating and GSTrap columns were performed
as recommended by the manufacturer. A HiPrep Desalting column was used
for buffer exchange. Anion exchange chromatography on a MonoQ column
was carried out in 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.7, using 1 M KCl as eluent. Dithiothreitol (0.5 mM) was
added to the buffers when using GSTrap, HiPrep Desalting, and MonoQ columns. Purification of histidine-tagged Gmd was performed with HiTrap
Chelating, and imidazole was removed using a HiPrep Desalting column
(20 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.7, 50 mM NaCl).
Glutathione S-transferase-tagged Gmd was purified using
GSTrap and MonoQ (elution at 300 mM KCl) columns. The Rmd
His-tagged fusion protein was purified by fast protein liquid
chromatography using HiTrap Chelating and MonoQ (elution at 330 mM KCl) columns. The proteins were stored at 4 °C or
after stabilization with 50% glycerol at 20 °C. The purity of the
enzymes was checked by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis
(4% stacking gel and 12% separating gel).
Enzyme Assays-- 20 nmol of GDP-D-mannose or GDP-6-deoxy-D-lyxo-4-hexulose were used for enzyme assays. His-Gmd was removed by ultrafiltration after in situ preparation of GDP-6-deoxy-D-lyxo-4-hexulose. The assay buffer contained 50 mM KH2PO4 (pH 7.0) and 10 mM MgCl2. Reactions were performed in 100 µl of reaction volume at 37 °C for 30 min. The samples were analyzed by HPLC on a CarboPac PA-1 column.
Synthesis of GDP-D-rhamnose-- 20 µmol of GDP-D-mannose were converted quantitatively to GDP-6-deoxy-D-lyxo-4-hexulose, as judged by HPLC analysis, using appropriate amounts of GST-Gmd in 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.7, 0.3 M KCl, and 0.5 mM dithiothreitol. The dehydratase was removed by ultrafiltration using Ultrafree-MC 10000 ultrafiltration cartridges. For the second reaction step Rmd and NADPH were added, and after complete conversion to GDP-D-rhamnose, NADP+ and NADPH were removed by HPLC. Ammonium acetate was removed by a desalting step using Sephadex G-10, and lyophilization resulted in pure GDP-D-rhamnose in 18.5% yield.
No ultrafiltration step was performed when synthesizing GDP-D-rhamnose with GST-Gmd only. Additional enzyme was added after the first reaction step, but inactivation of the enzyme resulted in incomplete reduction of the keto-intermediate and the yield of pure GDP-D-rhamnose was only 2%.
NMR Spectroscopy--
The lyophilized material of the first
preparation (2.0 mg) was dissolved in 99.95% D2O (0.5 ml).
The solution of the second sample (0.2 mg) contained 10 mg of NaCl,
which was added for resolution enhancement. Spectra for both solutions
(pD = ~5) were recorded at 300 K at 300.13 MHz for
1H, at 75.47 MHz for 13C, and 121.49 MHz for
31P, with a Bruker AVANCE 300 spectrometer equipped with a
5 mm quadruple nuclear inverse probehead (QNP). External
calibration was performed for 1H spectra with
2,2-dimethyl-2-silapentane-5-sulfonic acid ( = 0), for
13C spectra using 1,4-dioxane (
= 67.40), and for
31P spectra with H3PO4 (
= 0). Measurement of correlation spectroscopy (COSY), heteronuclear
multiple bond correlation, heteronuclear multiple quantum correlation,
and H,P-correlated spectra was performed with standard BRUKER software.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Cloning of the D-Rhamnose Operon--
The genes
encoding enzymes for the biosynthesis of a nucleotide sugar precursor
are usually clustered together within the corresponding gene cluster
for the particular bacterial polysaccharide (43). An alignment of 18 Gmd and putative Gmd sequences found in the NCBI data base was carried
out using MultAlin (36). Within the amino acid sequence there are
several highly conserved regions. One of these regions, GILFNHES, was
found to be identical in 16 of 18 data base entries, and the
seven-amino acid stretch GILFNHE was used for the design of the
degenerate oligonucleotide probe 5'-GGI ATH YTI TTY AAY CAY GA-3'
(where I is inosine, H is A/C/T, and Y is C/T). This
digoxigenin-labeled probe was used for Southern hybridization
experiments to get highly specific signals with completely digested
chromosomal DNA of A. thermoaerophilus L420-91T.
Hybridization of EcoRI-digested DNA at 36.5 °C resulted
in one specific band at 3 kilobases that was isolated and cloned into the plasmid pBCKS. The insert of the corresponding plasmid pRMD38 was
sequenced and contained part of the gmd gene besides one
hypothetical ORF (Fig. 2). The amino acid
sequence GILFNHES is also part of the new gmd sequence. The
downstream part of gmd was sequenced as described previously
(44) to yield further sequence information completing the
gmd gene and part of a second gene, putatively coding for
the reductase Rmd. Complete sequence of the second gene was obtained by
sequencing of plasmid pBK1 (Fig. 2), which is derived form a
GEM-12 clone. The D-rhamnose operon seems to consist
only of the two ORFs coding for Gmd and Rmd, because there are no other
ORFs on the upstream and downstream sequences, respectively.
|
Sequence Analysis--
The protein sequence of Gmd from A. thermoaerophius L420-91T was aligned with 27 Gmd
sequences obtained from data bases. These sequences include Gmd
proteins from bacteria as well as from archaea and eukarya. The
alignment showed a high level of overall identity in all sequences
used. The highest homology to the Gmd sequence of A. thermoaerophius L420-91T was obtained with the
following sequences: Caulobacter crescentus (GenBankTM accession number AAC38668), P. aeruginosa (AAG08828), and Aquifex aeolicus (D70393).
Recently, the crystal structure of Gmd from E. coli was
reported, and several conserved amino acid residues were proposed to be
important for substrate and cofactor binding and catalysis (21). All
these residues were found in Gmd of A. thermoaerophius
L420-91T except Thr133, which was replaced by
Ser (Fig. 3). According to these results, gmd from A. thermoaerophius L420-91T
is unequivocally identified as the gene encoding the
GDP-D-mannose 4,6-dehydratase.
|
An NCBI BLAST search was performed using the newly determined protein sequence of the second open reading frame in this operon, which putatively codes for Rmd. Two highly homologous proteins were found in the data base, one Mycobacterium tuberculosis putative dehydrogenase (GenBankTM accession number C70840, 35% identity, 53% similarity) and a P. aeruginosa protein (AAG08839, 33% identity, 54% similarity) described as Rmd, without any functional characterization. Further comparison of Rmd from A. thermoaerophius L420-91T with Gmd from A. thermoaerophius L420-91T and E. coli showed considerable similarity (Fig. 3). Especially two important motifs GXXGXXG, the cofactor-binding Wierenga motif, and YXXXK are conserved. The catalytic residues Tyr and Lys are completed by a Ser residue to form the catalytic triade, which is, together with the Wierenga motif, a characteristic feature of the SDR protein family (19). Because of the functional difference between Gmd and Rmd, some of the residues described to be important for binding of NADP+ and GDP-D-mannose in Gmd are not conserved (Fig. 3). Even one of the catalytic residues, Glu135 (Gmd of E. coli), is not conserved throughout the Rmd sequences. However, this residue is proposed to abstract a hydrogen atom from the hydroxyl group at C-5 of the sugar (21), and Rmd functions by reducing the keto group at C-4.
Expression and Purification of Gmd and Rmd--
Because of the
intrinsic instability of the GDP-D-mannose dehydratase, it
was not possible to obtain sufficient active, native protein, even
after only one purification step. His-Gmd was also partially
inactivated during purification with the HiTrap Chelating column.
However, GST-Gmd revealed higher stability. GST-Gmd was purified using
GSTrap and MonoQ columns and proved to be stable at 4 °C and at
20 °C. GDP-6-deoxy-D-lyxo-4-hexulose
reductase was expressed as a histidine-tagged fusion protein and
purified using HiTrap Chelating and MonoQ columns. Rmd was stable at
4 °C and at
20 °C. His-Gmd, GST-Gmd, as well as
histidine-tagged Rmd were used for the functional characterization of
the GDP-D-rhamnose biosynthetic pathway. The molecular
masses of the denatured proteins, determined by SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis analysis, were in good agreement with the calculated
molecular masses (His-Gmd, 40.1 kDa; GST-Gmd, 65.2 kDa; His-Rmd, 38.1 kDa; Fig. 4).
|
Gmd Catalyzes the Dehydration of
GDP-D-mannose--
GDP-D-mannose was converted
quantitatively to GDP-6-deoxy-D-lyxo-4-hexulose,
as judged by anion exchange HPLC analysis (rt = 33.0 min; Fig. 5). His-Gmd required the
addition of NADP+ as cofactor. NAD+ addition
resulted in less than 10% conversion, and this was also observed when
no cofactor was added. GST-Gmd converted the substrate without the
addition of any cofactor. The integrity of
GDP-6-deoxy-D-lyxo-4-hexulose was investigated
by chemical reduction of the keto group with NaBH4. The
reduction products were analyzed by HPLC (data not shown). Two products
were formed in a 1:2 ratio. The minor peak comigrated with
GDP-D-rhamnose (rt = 26.3 min), when
synthesized with Rmd (see below). The major peak showed a retention
time of 26.7 min, being slower than GDP-D-rhamnose but
faster than GDP-D-mannose (rt = 27.0 min). This product is supposed to be GDP-6-deoxy-D-talose. Because of the lack of an appropriate standard for nucleotide-activated 6-deoxytalose, no further proof of this assumption was possible. Attempts to isolate the intermediate product failed because of the
instability of the D-lyxo product.
GDP-6-deoxy-D-lyxo-4-hexulose was decomposed to
form GMP and GDP, as judged by HPLC analysis, even upon storage on ice
and after desalting on a Sephadex G-10 column.
|
Rmd Catalyzes the Reduction of
GDP-6-deoxy-D-lyxo-4-hexulose--
Because of the
instability of GDP-6-deoxy-D-lyxo-4-hexulose,
this intermediate product had to be prepared in situ for the characterization of the second reaction step in the
GDP-D-rhamnose biosynthetic pathway.
GDP-D-mannose was converted quantitatively to the hexulose,
and Gmd was removed from the reaction mixture by ultrafiltration. A new
product, migrating faster than GDP-D-mannose, as derived
from HPLC analysis, appeared when the intermediate product was
converted by the Rmd protein (Fig. 5). Under the applied assay
conditions, NADH and NADPH worked equally well as hydride donor.
Because of lack of a commercially available authentic standard for
GDP-D-rhamnose, this new product had to be further
characterized. The final product was hydrolyzed with trifluoroacetic
acid, and the released monosaccharides were analyzed by isocratic anion exchange chromatography on a CarboPac PA-1 column (Dionex system). The
product comigrated with an authentic rhamnose standard (Fig. 6). Ribose could also be detected and was
released from guanosine during hydrolysis. NMR analyses were
performed to elucidate the structure and anomeric configuration of the
final product, which was identified as GDP--D-rhamnose.
The reaction catalyzed by Rmd proceeded quantitatively. No reverse
reaction was observed, with either NAD+ or
NADP+ as cofactor.
|
Gmd Is a Bifunctional Enzyme with Both Dehydratase and Reductase Activities-- In a reference assay, using the Gmd protein for both the dehydration and the reduction reactions, the GDP-6-deoxy-D-lyxo-4-hexulose peak disappeared after short reaction time, and, again, a product comigrating with GDP-D-rhamnose was synthesized (Fig. 5). The assay was repeated as described in the previous section, but after ultrafiltration Gmd was added to the flow through instead of Rmd. Bifunctionality was displayed by both His-Gmd and GST-Gmd. The product was hydrolyzed, and anion exchange chromatography on a CarboPac PA-1 column identified the reaction product as rhamnose (Fig. 6). This material was also investigated by NMR analysis. Gmd and Rmd had the same characteristics concerning the reductase reaction. However, it should be mentioned that the instability, even of GST-Gmd, during the second reaction step was a limiting factor in the synthesis of GDP-D-rhamnose for NMR analysis. The total yield was only 2%, compared with 18.5% when using Gmd for the dehydratase step and Rmd for the subsequent reduction reaction. The specific activity of Rmd is higher and the extension of the time scale for conversion of larger amounts of GDP-6-deoxy-D-lyxo-4-hexulose by Gmd resulted in an inactivation of Gmd and incomplete conversion of the intermediate product.
NMR Analysis of GDP--D-rhamnose--
All
connectivities of the proton and carbon signals were unambiguously
assigned using H,H COSY, heteronuclear multiple quantum correlation,
and heteronuclear multiple bond
correlation measurements (Table I and Fig.
7). The signal at 1.25 ppm corresponds to
the 6-deoxy group, and the values of the coupling constants of the connected ring proton signals are in full accordance with the presence
of a manno-configured system, thus establishing the presence of a rhamnosyl unit. The value of the heteronuclear coupling constant JC1,H1 (174.9 Hz) is consistent with the
-anomeric configuration of the rhamnosyl unit. In addition, all
proton and carbon signals of the guanosine unit could be assigned
(Table I). In the proton-decoupled 31P spectrum, two
doublets with chemical shifts being characteristic of diphosphodiester
units were observed at
10.87 and
13.30 ppm, which were then
correlated to the H5'/H5" protons of the ribose unit and the anomeric
proton of the rhamnose residue, respectively (Fig. 7). The structural
identity of the GDP-D-rhamnose samples, resulting from
either the Gmd/Rmd incubation or the Gmd treatment alone, was
established by comparison of their proton spectra.
|
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The GDP-D-rhamnose operon of A. thermoaerophilus L420-91T has been cloned by Southern hybridization experiments using a degenerate probe derived from an alignment of 18 Gmd sequences from the NCBI data base. It had been postulated that genes coding for enzymes involved in the synthesis of nucleotide sugar precursors are usually found in operons within the corresponding gene cluster for a particular bacterial polysaccharide (43). Indeed, on the genome of A. thermoaerophilus L420-91T the ORF of the rmd gene starts immediately after the end of the ORF of gmd. Gmd is highly conserved throughout the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and in higher eukaryotic organisms, such as plants and animals. Only two of 45 Gmd and putative Gmd protein sequences currently available in the NCBI data base deviate from the eight-amino acid stretch GILFNHES, namely those of Streptomyces noursei (AAF71765) and Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus I (AAC96486). The amino acid residues reported to be important for cofactor or GDP-D-mannose binding and catalysis are conserved in the newly described gmd gene from A. thermoaerophilus L420-91T. Only Thr133 from the sequence in E. coli is replaced by a Ser residue in A. thermoaerophilus L420-91T. However, for UDP-glucose 4-epimerase, the exchange of a comparable Ser residue by Thr did not affect Km and reduced kcat 3-fold (45). The influence of the exchange of Ser to Thr in Gmd in A. thermoaerophilus L420-91T is not known. The conservation of the complete Gmd protein in archaea, bacteria, plants, and animals and even the virus is remarkable. This fact may reflect the importance of the enzyme throughout evolution. A BLAST search with the second protein sequence of the GDP-D-rhamnose operon yielded two highly homologous proteins. The first one is a putative dehydrogenase of M. tuberculosis (C70840), which has also a putative Gmd sequence in its genome. These two enzymes, however, are not part of the same operon or cluster, and it is not known whether M. tuberculosis possesses D-rhamnose in one of its polysaccharide structures. The second highly homologous protein is the Rmd enzyme of P. aeruginosa (AAG08839). Recently, in a knock-out experiment, the rmd gene has been deleted to result in a P. aeruginosa mutant, lacking any A-band LPS (31). However, this protein has not been expressed and purified, so far, to do functional characterization. In P. aeruginosa both the gmd and rmd genes belong to the A-band gene cluster. Further comparison of the conserved residues among the Gmd and the Rmd proteins have shown that at least the most prominent residues are found in both functionally different proteins. Especially the Wierenga motif GXXGXXG and the catalytic triade Ser-Tyr-Lys are present in both proteins. These sequence features are characteristic of the SDR protein family, a large and diverse group of dehydrogenases, reductases, dehydratases, isomerases, and epimerases (20). Rmd is a novel member of this protein family. A number of other residues important in Gmd catalysis are not found in Rmd. For example, Glu135 of the E. coli enzyme is not conserved among the (putative) Rmd proteins, although it was identified in Rmd of A. thermoaerophilus L420-91T. Glu135 was reported to abstract an H atom from C-5 of the previously produced keto-intermediate (21). Subsequently, dehydration of mannose is completed. In the following reduction reaction by Rmd, the C-5 atom of GDP-6-deoxy-D-xylo-4-hexulose is not involved.
The inherent instability of the gmd gene product, which we experienced during our investigations, is in agreement with literature reports on porcine thyroid (46), E. coli (16), and human (47) Gmd proteins. Thus, expression and characterization of the rather stable fusion proteins, His-Gmd and particularly GST-Gmd, was an optimal way to enable synthesis of GDP-D-rhamnose. The reason for the widespread instability of these enzymes is not known to date. Another serious problem of this reaction cascade is the instability of GDP-6-deoxy-D-lyxo-4-hexulose. Recently, groups working with Perinereis cultrifera and A. thaliana have also observed instability of GDP-6-deoxy-D-lyxo-4-hexulose (14, 15), and the same has been reported for dTDP-6-deoxy-L-lyxo-4-hexulose (29, 48). Because of the instability of dTDP-6-deoxy-L-lyxo-4-hexulose, this substrate was generated in situ for kinetic analysis of dTDP-6-deoxy-L-lyxo-4-hexulose reductase (29). In situ generation of GDP-6-deoxy-D-lyxo-4-hexulose for kinetic measurements of Rmd is not possible because of the bifunctionality of Gmd from A. thermoaerophilus L420-91T. Rapid decomposition of isolated GDP-6-deoxy-D-lyxo-4-hexulose results in decreasing substrate concentrations, and, therefore, initial reaction velocities are underestimated. In previous kinetic studies of GDP-fucose synthetase, when using this substrate, it was not stated, however, whether this problem was considered (49, 50).
The dehydratase Gmd is dependent on addition of NADP+, at least for the His-tagged fusion protein. When working with the GST-tagged protein, the independence of any added cofactor might be due to tight binding of the cofactor to the protein, even during purification over GSTrap and MonoQ columns. NADP+ dependence of the Gmd protein was also reported for the enzymes of Klebsiella pneumoniae (51), E. coli (16), and H. sapiens (47). This fact can be explained with a conserved Arg residue, binding the 2'-phosphate of NADP+ (21). In porcine tyroid NAD+ is proposed to play this role (46).
The conversion of GDP-6-deoxy-D-lyxo-4-hexulose to GDP-D-rhamnose by Rmd proceeds quantitatively, because no reverse reaction has been detected. These results imply that Rmd is a reductase, which has also been shown for dTDP-6-deoxy-L-lyxo-4-hexulose reductase (RmlD), the enzyme catalyzing the equivalent reduction step in the biosynthetic pathway of dTDP-L-rhamnose (29). Upon isolation of GDP-D-rhamnose chemical and NMR analyses have confirmed integrity of this product.
Gmd from A. thermoaerophilus L420-91T catalyzes
both the dehydration and the reduction step. This is the first report
of a bifunctional enzyme displaying both dehydratase and reductase activities. The enzyme has been purified to homogeneity, and
bifunctionality cannot be attributed to contaminating activities,
because E. coli itself does not produce
GDP-D-rhamnose. A BLAST search, using E. coli
sequences currently available in the NCBI data base, with the A. thermoaerophilus Rmd protein, yielded Gmd sequences from several
strains, but no Rmd sequence was identified. A possible explanation of
the observed bifunctionality may be mutation events affecting the
gmd gene. We assume that the investigated A. thermoaerophilus strain has no disadvantages regarding growth,
when the enzyme involved in dehydration of GDP-D-mannose
also catalyzes the reduction of the intermediate product to form
GDP-D-rhamnose. Nevertheless, Rmd is far more efficient in
catalyzing the reduction reaction. With Gmd alone, it might be that
insufficient amounts of GDP-D-rhamnose are produced for
complete S-layer protein glycosylation.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
---|
We appreciate the helpful discussions with Dr. J. S. Lam (University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada).
![]() |
FOOTNOTES |
---|
* This work was supported by Austrian Science Fund Projects P12966-MOB and P14209-MOB and Austrian National Bank Project 7923 (to P. M.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF317224.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Zentrum für
Ultrastrukturforschung und Ludwig Boltzmann-Institut für
Molekulare Nanotechnologie, Universität für Bodenkultur
Wien, Gregor-Mendel-Str. 33, A-1180 Wien, Austria. Tel.:
43-1-47654, Ext. 2202; Fax: 43-1-4789112; E-mail:
pmessner@edv1.boku.ac.at.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, November 28, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M010027200
2 G. Adam, unpublished data.
![]() |
ABBREVIATIONS |
---|
The abbreviations used are: S-layer, surface-layer; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; Gmd, GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase; Rmd, GDP-6-deoxy-D-lyxo-4-hexulose reductase; ORF, open reading frame; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; His-Gmd, histidine-tagged Gmd; GST, glutathione S-transferase; GST-Gmd, GST-tagged Gmd; HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography; COSY, correlation spectroscopy.
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
1. | Sleytr, U. B., and Beveridge, T. J. (1999) Trends Microbiol. 7, 253-260[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
2. |
Sára, M.,
and Sleytr, U. B.
(2000)
J. Bacteriol.
182,
859-868 |
3. | Messner, P., and Schäffer, C. (2000) in Glycomicrobiology (Doyle, R. J., ed) , pp. 93-125, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York |
4. | Sumper, M., and Wieland, F. T. (1995) in Glycoproteins (Montreuil, J. , Vliegenthart, J. F. G. , and Schachter, H., eds) , pp. 455-473, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam |
5. | Kosma, P., Neuninger, C., Christian, R., Schulz, G., and Messner, P. (1995) Glycoconjugate J. 12, 99-107[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
6. | Schäffer, C., Wugeditsch, T., Neuninger, C., and Messner, P. (1996) Microb. Drug Resist. 2, 17-23[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
7. |
Hickman, J.,
and Ashwell, G.
(1966)
J. Biol. Chem.
241,
1424-1428 |
8. | Smith, A. R., Zamze, S. E., Munro, S. M., Carter, K. J., and Hignett, R. C. (1985) Eur. J. Biochem. 149, 73-78[Abstract] |
9. | Yokota, S., Kaya, S., Sawada, S., Kawamura, T., Araki, Y., and Ito, E. (1987) Eur. J. Biochem. 167, 203-209[Abstract] |
10. | Cerantola, S., and Montrozier, H. (1997) Eur. J. Biochem. 246, 360-366[Abstract] |
11. | Senchenkova, S. N., Shashkov, A. S., Knirel, Y. A., McGovern, J. J., and Moran, A. P. (1996) Eur. J. Biochem. 239, 434-438[Abstract] |
12. | Kocharova, N. A., Knirel, Y. A., Widmalm, G., Jansson, P. E., and Moran, A. P. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 4755-4760[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
13. |
Markovitz, A.
(1964)
J. Biol. Chem.
239,
2091-2098 |
14. | Bulet, P., Hoflack, B., Porchet, M., and Verbert, A. (1984) Eur. J. Biochem. 144, 255-259[Abstract] |
15. | Bonin, C. P., and Reiter, W. D. (2000) Plant J. 21, 445-454[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
16. | Sturla, L., Bisso, A., Zanardi, D., Benatti, U., De Flora, A., and Tonetti, M. (1997) FEBS Lett. 412, 126-130[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
17. |
Bonin, C. P.,
Potter, I.,
Vanzin, G. F.,
and Reiter, W. D.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
2085-2090 |
18. |
Sullivan, F. X.,
Kumar, R.,
Kriz, R.,
Stahl, M.,
Xu, G. Y.,
Rouse, J.,
Chang, X. J.,
Boodhoo, A.,
Potvin, B.,
and Cumming, D. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
8193-8202 |
19. | Jörnvall, H., Persson, B., Krook, M., Atrian, S., Gonzalez-Duarte, R., Jeffery, J., and Ghosh, D. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 6003-6013[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
20. | Jörnvall, H., Höög, J. O., and Persson, B. (1999) FEBS Lett. 445, 261-264[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
21. | Somoza, J. R., Menon, S., Schmidt, H., Joseph-McCarthy, D., Dessen, A., Stahl, M. L., Somers, W. S., and Sullivan, F. X. (2000) Structure Fold. Des. 8, 123-135[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
22. | Baker, M. E., and Blasco, R. (1992) FEBS Lett. 301, 89-93[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
23. | Labesse, G., Vidal-Cros, A., Chomilier, J., Gaudry, M., and Mornon, J. P. (1994) Biochem. J. 304, 95-99[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
24. | Thoden, J. B., Gulick, A. M., and Holden, H. M. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 10685-10695[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
25. | Thoden, J. B., Wohlers, T. M., Fridovich-Keil, J. L., and Holden, H. M. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 5691-5701[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
26. | Rizzi, M., Tonetti, M., Vigevani, P., Sturla, L., Bisso, A., Flora, A. D., Bordo, D., and Bolognesi, M. (1998) Structure 6, 1453-1465[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
27. | Somers, W. S., Stahl, M. L., and Sullivan, F. X. (1998) Structure 6, 1601-1612[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
28. | Deacon, A. M., Ni, Y. S., Coleman, W. G., Jr., and Ealick, S. E. (2000) Structure Fold. Des. 8, 453-462[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
29. |
Graninger, M.,
Nidetzky, B.,
Heinrichs, D. E.,
Whitfield, C.,
and Messner, P.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
25869-25877 |
30. | Wierenga, R. K., Maeyer, M. C. H., and Hol, W. G. J. (1985) Biochemistry 24, 1346-1357 |
31. | Rocchetta, H. L., Pacan, J. C., and Lam, J. S. (1998) Mol. Microbiol. 19, 1419-1434[CrossRef] |
32. | Meier-Stauffer, K., Busse, H.-J., Rainey, F. A., Burghardt, J., Scheberl, A., Hollaus, F., Kuen, B., Makristathis, A., Sleytr, U. B., and Messner, P. (1996) Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 46, 532-541 |
33. | Heyndrickx, M., Lebbe, L., Vancanneyt, M., Kersters, K., De Vos, P., Logan, N. A., Forsyth, G., Nazli, S., Ali, N., and Berkeley, R. C. W. (1997) Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 47, 808-817 |
34. | Palmieri, M. J., Berry, G. T., Player, D. A., Rogers, S., and Segal, S. (1991) Anal. Biochem. 184, 388-393 |
35. | Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
36. | Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
37. |
Altschul, S. F.,
Madden, T. L.,
Schaffer, A. A.,
Zhang, J.,
Zhang, Z.,
Miller, W.,
and Lipman, D. J.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
3389-3402 |
38. | Corpet, F. (1988) Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 10881-10890[Abstract] |
39. |
Bairoch, A.,
Bucher, P.,
and Hofmann, K.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
217-221 |
40. | Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed. , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
41. | Ma, H., Kunes, S., Schatz, P. J., and Botstein, D. (1987) Gene (Amst.) 58, 201-216[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
42. | Gietz, D., Jean, A. S., Woods, R. A., and Schiestl, R. H. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 1425[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
43. | Reeves, P. R. (1994) Compr. Biochem. 27, 271-314 |
44. | Kneidinger, B., Graninger, M., and Messner, P. (2001) BioTechniques, in press |
45. | Liu, Y., Thoden, J. B., Kim, J., Berger, E., Gulick, A. M., Ruzicka, F. J., Holden, H. M., and Frey, P. A. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 10675-10684[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
46. | Broschat, K. O., Chang, S., and Serif, G. (1985) Eur. J. Biochem. 153, 1693-1697 |
47. | Bisso, A., Sturla, L., Zanardi, D., De Flora, A., and Tonetti, M. (1999) FEBS Lett. 456, 370-374[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
48. | Stern, R. J., Lee, T. Y., Lee, T. J., Yan, W., Scherman, M. S., Vissa, V. D., Kim, S. K., Wanner, B. L., and McNeil, M. R. (1999) Microbiology 145, 663-671[Abstract] |
49. |
Menon, S.,
Stahl, M.,
Kumar, R.,
Xu, G. Y.,
and Sullivan, F.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
26743-26750 |
50. |
Albermann, C.,
Distler, J.,
and Piepersberg, W.
(2000)
Glycobiology
10,
875-881 |
51. | Yamamoto, K., Katayama, I., Onoda, Y., Inami, M., Kumagai, H., and Tochikura, T. (1993) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 300, 694-698[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |