Cloning, Characterization, and Chromosomal Mapping of a Human Electroneutral Na+-driven Cl-HCO3 Exchanger*

Irina I GrichtchenkoDagger §, Inyeong ChoiDagger , Xiaobo Zhong||, Patricia Bray-Ward||, John M. Russell**, and Walter F. BoronDagger

From the Dagger  Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology and the || Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520 and the ** Department of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244

Received for publication, October 10, 2000, and in revised form, December 26, 2000



    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The electroneutral Na+-driven Cl-HCO3 exchanger is a key mechanism for regulating intracellular pH (pHi) in neurons, glia, and other cells. Here we report the cloning, tissue distribution, chromosomal location, and functional characterization of the cDNA of such a transporter (NDCBE1) from human brain (GenBankTM accession number AF069512). NDCBE1, which encodes 1044 amino acids, is 34% identical to the mammalian anion exchanger (AE2); ~50% to the electrogenic Na/HCO3 cotransporter (NBCe1) from salamander, rat, and humans; ~73% to mammalian electroneutral Na/HCO3 cotransporters (NBCn1); 71% to mouse NCBE; and 47% to a Na+-driven anion exchanger (NDAE1) from Drosophila. Northern blot analysis of NDCBE1 shows a robust ~12-kilobase signal in all major regions of human brain and in testis, and weaker signals in kidney and ovary. This human gene (SLC4A8) maps to chromosome 12q13. When expressed in Xenopus oocytes and running in the forward direction, NDCBE1 is electroneutral and mediates increases in both pHi and [Na+]i (monitored with microelectrodes) that require HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> and are blocked by 4,4'-diisothiocyanostilbene-2,2'-disulfonic acid (DIDS). The pHi increase also requires extracellular Na+. The Na+:HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> stoichiometry is 1:2. Forward-running NDCBE1 mediates a 36Cl efflux that requires extracellular Na+ and HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> and is blocked by DIDS. Running in reverse, NDCBE1 requires extracellular Cl-. Thus, NDCBE1 encodes a human, electroneutral Na+-driven Cl-HCO3 exchanger.



    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The first transporter shown to be involved in the regulation of intracellular pH (pHi) was the Na+-driven Cl-HCO3 exchanger, initially described in squid axons (1-3), snail neurons (4-6), and barnacle muscle (7). This acid extruder (i.e. a transporter that behaves as if it mediates net H+ efflux) could function according to any of the four schemes (8) in Fig. 1A. In physiology experiments on mammalian cells, it is often extremely difficult to distinguish this transporter from either an electroneutral Na/HCO3 cotransporter (NBCn1, Fig. 1B) (9, 10) or an electrogenic Na/HCO3 cotransporter (NBCe1, Fig. 1C) (11, 12) because of problems depleting cells of Cl- or measuring very small electrical changes. In the absence of electrical data, one could not distinguish an electroneutral Na+-driven Cl-HCO3 exchanger from the scheme in Fig. 1D, which is a hybrid of those in Fig. 1, A-C. The Na+-driven anion exchanger (NDAE1) recently cloned from Drosophila (13) does not require HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> and could function according to either of the top two schemes in Fig. 1A, but with OH- replacing HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Models of Na+-driven HCO<UP><SUB><B>3</B></SUB><SUP><B>−</B></SUP></UP> or CO<UP><SUB><B>3</B></SUB><SUP><B>−</B></SUP></UP> flux.

In mammalian cells, increases in pHi that appear to depend on Na+, Cl-, and HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> have been described in neurons (14-16), astrocytes (17, 18), renal mesangial cells (19), corneal endothelium (20), bile duct (21), aortic endothelium (22), spermatozoa (23), and various transformed cells (24-26). However, given the difficulties noted above, definitively ascribing a cell phenotype to a transporter will require molecular tools. It is therefore extremely important not only to clone the genes encoding various Na+-driven HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> transporters, but also to assign their function unambiguously to one of the schemes in Fig. 1.

Here we report the tissue distribution, chromosomal location, and functional characterization of a cDNA that we cloned from human brain (GenBankTM accession number AF069512 and NCBI accession number AAC82380). Our physiological analysis indicates that this cDNA encodes an electroneutral Na+-driven Cl-HCO3 exchanger (NDCBE1, Fig. 1A).


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cloning of NDCBE1-- We cloned NDCBE1 in three parts. After performing a BLAST search, using the salamander NBCe1 cDNA sequence (GenBankTM accession number AF001958) as the query, of the GenBankTM data base, we obtained the central part as a cDNA expressed sequence tag (EST)1 clone AA775966 (catalogue number CDNA-1401, Genome System Inc., St. Louis, MO). We obtained the 5'-end by performing rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE). Using human brain poly(A)+ RNA (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA) as the template, we generated cDNA using an NDCBE1-specific primer corresponding to nucleotide sequence 598-627 (numbered from first nucleotide of open reading frame). The downstream, NDCBE1-specific primers for RACE corresponded to nt 547-579 and nt 328-358. We used the two upstream primers provided in the RACE kit (Life Technologies, Inc.). We obtained the 3'-end by performing a nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR), using a human brain lambda ZAPII cDNA library (gift of Dr. Nancy Lynn Johnston, John Hopkins University) as the template. The upstream, NDCBE1-specific primers corresponded to nt 1876-1905 and nt 2014-2043, and the downstream primer corresponded to a sequence near the polycloning site in the pBluescript vector. We verified that the three cDNA fragments represent a single transcript by performing PCR using an upstream primer corresponding to a region (nt -44 to -18) in the 5'-untranslated region (UTR) and a downstream primer corresponding to a region in the 3'-UTR (nt 3136-3165). We obtained the consensus sequence by directly sequencing the full-length PCR product (Keck Sequencing Center, Yale University). We also subcloned the full-length PCR product into the oocyte expression vector pGH19 (27), sequenced the clone, and corrected PCR errors on the basis of the consensus sequence. The full-length sequence (GenBankTM accession number AF069512) was released in 1998.

FISH Mapping-- Using a NDCBE1 cDNA as template, we generated a 304-bp cDNA probe, corresponding to a unique region (nt 54-358). DNA clone 477 L 11 from the RPCI-11 human BAC library was identified by Research Genetics, Inc. (Huntsville, AL). The purified BAC DNA was labeled with biotin-dUTP by nick translation. DNA of a chromosome-12 painting library was labeled with Cy3-dUTP by PCR. A biotin-labeled BAC probe, alone or together with Cy3-labeled chromosome-12 painting probe, was hybridized to metaphase chromosome spreads in the presence of human Cot-1 DNA and salmon sperm DNA. The biotin-labeled probe was detected by avidin-fluorescein isothiocyanate. Fifty metaphase spreads were taken for analysis and measurements. Gray scale images were obtained using an Olympus epifluorescence microscope coupled to a cooled CCD camera (Photometrics Ltd., Tucson, AZ). Fractional length measurement and band assignment were established by analysis of ten chromosomes (28).

Northern Analysis-- Northern blots from various human tissues (catalogue numbers 7760-1 and 7759-1) were obtained from CLONTECH. The [32P]dCTP-labeled, randomly primed 671-bp cDNA probe was generated to the unique 5'-region of NDCBE1 (nt -44 to 627). Membranes were incubated overnight at 68 °C in ExpressHybTM hybridization buffer (CLONTECH) containing the 32P-labeled probe. Subsequently, membranes were washed at room temperature in 2 × SSC, 0.05% SDS for 40 min and then at 50 °C in 0.1 × SSC, 0.1% SDS for 1.5 h, before being exposed to Kodak X-Omat film at -80 °C for 24 h for detection of high-intensity signals.

Oocytes-- We transcribed NDCBE1 cDNA in vitro using an mMessage mMachineTM kit (Ambion, Austin, TX) with T7 RNA polymerase. Defolliculated Xenopus laevis oocytes (Stage V-VI) were prepared as described previously (29) and injected with 50 nl of NDCBE1 cRNA (1 µg/µl) or water and incubated in OR3 media. Injected oocytes were maintained for 3-7 days at 18 °C before use. For experiments in which we reversed NDCBE1, the 50-nl injectate contained not only NDCBE1 cRNA (1 µg/µl), but also cRNA encoding the amiloride-sensitive epithelial Na+ channel (ENaC; 0.2 µg/µl, gift of Dr. Cecilia Canessa, Yale University). Immediately after this coinjection, we added 20 µM amiloride to the oocyte culture media. One hour prior to the experiment, we transferred coinjected oocytes into amiloride-free HEPES solution.

Electrophysiology-- The voltage, pH- and sodium-sensitive microelectrodes, were prepared as described previously (10, 29, 30). The pH electrode tip was filled with proton ionophore 1 mixture B (Fluka Chemical Corp., Ronkonkoma, NY) and back-filled with a pH 7 phosphate buffer (31). The Na+ electrode tip was filled with sodium ionophore 1 mixture A (Fluka Chemical Corp.) and back-filled with 10 mM NaCl. Electrodes were connected to high-impedance electrometers (model FD-223; World Precision Instruments, Inc., Sarasota, FL), which in turn were connected to the A-D converter of a computer.

In electrophysiological experiments, the CO2/HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>-free ND96 solution contained (in mM) 96 NaCl, 2 KCl, 1.8 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, and 5 HEPES (pH 7.5); osmolality was 188-200 mOsm/kg, 22 °C. In solutions equilibrated with 1.5% CO2 (pH 7.50), 5% CO2 (pH 7.50), and 20% CO2 (pH 6.9), we replaced 10, 33, and 33 mM NaCl, respectively, with an equivalent molarity of NaHCO3. Ether N-methyl-D-glucammonium (NMDG+) replaced Na+ in Na+-free solutions, and gluconate replaced Cl- in Cl--free solutions. In some solutions we replaced 16 mM NaCl with 16 mM of n-butyric acid sodium salt (B-5887, Sigma).

36Cl Fluxes-- Ten to twenty oocytes were incubated at room temperature for ~3 h in 250 µl of 36Cl "loading solution", which consisted of (in mM): 70 NaCl, 4 KCl, 1.8 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, and 32 HEPES titrated with NaOH to pH 7.5; 36Cl was present as 190 µCi/mmol of total Cl-. We then rapidly washed the oocytes five times with 0.5 ml of ice-cold HEPES flux solution (same as "loading solution," but without 36Cl). The washed oocytes were transferred to one-half of a 1-ml equilibrium-dialysis chamber (BelArts Products, Pequannock, NJ) containing ~0.5 ml of ice-cold HEPES flux solution. The other half of the dialysis chamber, modified to permit continuous inflow and outflow of solution, was placed open-side up. We added a small magnetic stirring flea, covered the opening with a nylon mesh membrane (which permits free exchange of solution between the two chamber halves), and lightly coated the open edges of the chamber half with silicon stopcock grease (High Vacuum Grease, Dow-Corning, Midland, MI), which acted as a gasket when the two chamber halves were joined and placed oocyte-side up on a magnetic stirring plate. We flowed ice-cold HEPES flux solution at 8 ml/min for 2 min to wash out extracellular 36Cl and then flowed room temperature solution at 3 ml/min for 4 min before beginning to collect samples of the chamber effluent at 3 ml/min every 3 min. Experiments with dye indicated that the time to exchange 95% of the fluid in the upper (i.e. oocyte) chamber half was ~2 min. All samples were collected directly into plastic scintillation vials, to which we later added 9 ml of Ultima GoldTM liquid scintillation counting mixture (Packard Instrument Co., Meriden, CT). At the end of the experiment, the chamber was rapidly taken apart, the oocytes were transferred to 150 µl of a 10% SDS solution in 1 N NaOH for digestion, and a 50-µl aliquot of the digest was prepared for liquid scintillation counting. We calculated the initial 36Cl content of the oocytes and the fractional rate of 36Cl loss during each sampling period in the experiment. The CO2/HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> flux solution used in the 36Cl flux experiments was the same as the HEPES flux solution, except that 33 mM HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> replaced 33 mM Cl-, and the solution was equilibrated with 5% CO2, 95% O2.

Statistics-- Data are expressed as mean ± S.E. Statistical significance was judged from unpaired Student's t tests.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Molecular Characterization

Cloning-- Querying with the sequence of the cDNA encoding salamander NBCe1 (12), we searched the GenBankTM data base and found a human brain EST clone (accession number AA775966) that, at one end, was 53% identical to query. Sequencing this EST clone revealed a 2-kb open reading frame, representing the center of the full-length clone. We obtained the 5'-end by RACE on human brain RNA and the 3'-end by PCR on a human frontal-lobe cDNA library. We obtained the full-length clone, which encodes 1044 amino acids, by performing PCR on human brain cDNA, using primers designed to amplify the entire open reading frame as well as portions of the 5'- and 3'-UTRs.

Sequence Analysis-- Fig. 2A compares the deduced amino acid sequence of NDCBE1 to electroneutral NBCn1 from rat (NBCn1-D; 73% identity) (10) and to electrogenic NBCe1 from rat kidney (rkNBC; 50% identity) (32). NDCBE1 has two consensus sites for N-glycosylation on the presumed 5,6 extracellular loop (residues 646-649/NHTL and 666-669/NLTV), 12 for protein kinase C, and one for protein kinase A (243-246/KKQS). Like NBCn1 (10), NDCBE1 has one potential DIDS motif (33, 34) (813-816/KLKK), corresponding to the second of two similar motifs in electrogenic NBCs (12). Fig. 2B summarizes the relationships among the primary structures of NDCBE1 and other members of the HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> transporter superfamily.



View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Molecular characterization of NDCBE1. A, comparison of amino acid sequences of human NDCBE1, rat electroneutral NBCn1-D, and electrogenic NBCe1 from rat kidney (rkNBC). Residues identical to NDCBE1 are in reverse type. Based on the hydropathy plot of NDCBE1 (not shown), which is similar to those of NBCe1 (12) and NBCn1 (10), we propose ten membrane-spanning segments, as indicated by the numbered horizontal lines. B, dendrogram of selected members of HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> transporter superfamily. Percent divergence (amino acid level) is indicated by total length of horizontal line segments. rb2NBC (GenBankTM accession number AF124441) (40), hhNBC (GenBankTM accession number AF069510) (35, 37), rkNBC (GenBankTM accession number AF004017) (32), and akNBC (GenBankTM accession number AF001958) (12) are all electrogenic. NBCn1-D (GenBankTM accession number AF080106) (10) and NBCn1-A (GenBankTM accession number AF047033) (38) are presumably electroneutral, as is NBCn1-B (10). mNCBE (GenBankTM accession number AB033759) (43) is a mouse clone. The C. elegans EST (GenBankTM accession number Z75541) mediates Na+-driven HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> uptake (63). Drosophila NDAE1 (AF047468) (13) is a Na+-driven anion exchanger that does not require HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>. hAE1 (GenBankTM accession number P04919) (64) is a human Cl-HCO3 exchanger. C, chromosomal localization of human NDCBE1 gene by FISH: cohybridization of biotin-labeled BAC 477 L 11 clone (yellow) with a chromosome-12 painting probe (magenta). D, localization to 12q13. Arrows point to chromosomal band 12q13 in ideogram (left) and photograph (right). E, Northern blot analysis of poly(A)+ RNA from human tissues probed with cDNA fragment corresponding to nucleotides -44 to 627 of NDCBE1. The film was exposed for 24 h.

Chromosomal Mapping-- An NDCBE1 BAC clone produced clear FISH signals on a pair of chromosomes (not shown), which, on the basis of their size, morphology, and DAPI stain-banding pattern, we identified as chromosome 12. Cohybridization of this BAC clone with a chromosome-12 painting probe confirmed the identification (Fig. 2C). The BAC clone hybridized 22% of the distance from the centromere to the telomere of arm 12q, corresponding to band 12q13 (Fig. 2D). In contrast, human NBCe1 (SLC4A5) maps (35) to chromosome 4q21, and human NBCn1 (SLC4A7) maps (36) to 3p22.

Tissue Distribution of mRNA-- A Northern blot analysis of multiple human tissues (Fig. 2E) revealed a ~12-kb transcript, with strong signals in brain and testis and a weaker signals in kidney > ovary. The weak ~9.5-kb bands (pancreas > kidney) may represent NBCe1 (35, 37). The very weak ~7.5-kb band (testis) may represent the human ortholog of NBCn1 (38). The bands at ~6.3 kb (brain > testis > kidney), ~4.2 kb (testis), and ~3.3 kb (brain > testis) may represent alternative splicing of the NDCBE1 primary transcript or products of different but related genes. We found that the three bands that appear in the Northern blot of whole brain also are present in multiple brain regions (not shown), including cerebral cortex, cerebellum, medulla, thalamus, and hippocampus. However, NDCBE1 was notably absent from spinal cord.

Physiological Characterization

Na+ Dependence of pHi Recovery-- To determine the function of NDCBE1, we injected cRNA into oocytes and used microelectrodes to monitor pHi and membrane potential (Vm). In oocytes expressing NDCBE1 (Fig. 3A), extracellular 1.5% CO2, 10 mM HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> elicited a rapid fall in pHi due to CO2 influx (39), followed by an increase due to HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> uptake. Removing extracellular Na+ converted the pHi recovery to a very slow acidification, reflecting reversal of NDCBE1. In water-injected oocytes, 1.5% CO2, 10 mM HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> caused the usual pHi fall, followed by a long period of stability, with or without Na+ (not shown). Thus, NDCBE1 requires Na+.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Functional characterization of NDCBE1 expressed in Xenopus oocytes and running in forward direction. In A-C, oocytes were impaled with pH and voltage microelectrodes. A, Na+ dependence and electroneutrality. Just before Na+ removal, pHi increased at a mean rate (dpHi/dt) of 9.9 ± 2.5 × 10-5 pH units s-1 (n = 12). After removal of extracellular Na+ (arrowheads), dpHi/dt was -4.4 ± 2.6 × 10-5 pH units s-1 (n = 6). In record of membrane voltage (Vm), the arrow indicates application of CO2/HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>, and arrowheads indicate the removal and return of Na+. B, HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> dependence. "Butyric acid" solution contained 16 mM total butyrate at pH 7.5. During flat portion of butyric acid record, dpHi/dt averaged 0.69 ± 0.13 × 10-5 pH units s-1 (mean pHi = 6.94 ± 0.04), whereas during initial rising phase of CO2/HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> record, dpHi/dt averaged 12.1 ± 1.0 × 10-5 pH units s-1 (mean pHi = 7.03 ± 0.02; n = 5; paired experiments with random order; p = 0.011 for pHi comparison, and p < 0.00001 for dpHi/dt comparison, one tail). C, DIDS sensitivity. D, 36Cl efflux, presented as normalized fractional loss of 36Cl. We discarded the first three 3-min samples to allow 36Cl flux to stabilize. We normalized data to unity at the first sample shown in figure. The average, initial rate constants were 0.00024 s-1 for "control", 0.00034 s-1 for "0-Na+", 0.00016 s-1 for "DIDS" oocytes, which all were expressing NDCBE1; the value was 0.00013 s-1 for water-injected oocytes. For control, the average rate constant of the last four samples in CO2/HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> buffer was 0.00040 s-1; for DIDS, the comparable value for the last five samples was 0.00015 s-1; thus, the DIDS-sensitive rate constant was 0.00025 s-1. Error bars indicate S.E. and are absent when S.E. was smaller than size of symbol. E, [Na+]i increase. The oocyte was expressing NDCBE1. F, comparison of Na+ and HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> transport in presence of 5% CO2, 33 mM HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>. For Na+, values are mean rates of [Na+]i increase. For HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>, values are "pseudo-fluxes", i.e. product of dpHi/dt and total buffering power (65); the latter is the sum of intrinsic buffering power (16 mM/pH unit, computed from CO2-induced pHi decrease in water-injected oocytes) and CO2 buffering power (computed from pHi and [CO2]). Hash marks indicate S.E.; number of observations are in parentheses.

Electroneutrality-- In oocytes expressing NDCBE1 (Fig. 3A), 1.5% CO2, 10 mM HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> caused a small, slow depolarization (arrow), and removing Na+ caused a slight hyperpolarization (arrowhead), as observed in H2O-injected oocytes (not shown). In contrast, with oocytes expressing electrogenic NBCs, applying CO2/HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> elicits a large and rapid hyperpolarization, whereas removing Na+ elicits a large and rapid depolarization (12, 29, 40). Thus, NDCBE1 is electroneutral.

HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> Dependence of pHi Recovery-- When we acidified NDCBE1-expressing oocytes with butyric acid, rather than CO2, pHi failed to recover in the presence of Na+ (Fig. 3B). However, after we removed the butyric acid and applied CO2/HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>, pHi initially recovered rapidly, even though pHi was substantially higher than in the presence of butyric acid. Thus, NDCBE1 requires HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>.

Inhibition of pHi Recovery by DIDS-- Applying 0.5 mM DIDS almost completely blocks the pHi recovery (Fig. 3C). In six experiments, the inhibition averaged 95% ± 10%. Thus, NDCBE1 is DIDS sensitive.

36Cl Efflux-- When we introduced 5% CO2, 33 mM HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> (pH 7.50) to NDCBE1-expressing oocytes, the 36Cl efflux increased more than 3-fold (Fig. 3D). The slow decline in 36Cl efflux probably reflects a NDCBE1-mediated increase in pHi, [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>]i and [Na+]i. These changes were absent in oocytes injected with water, rather than NDCBE1 cRNA. Moreover, in NDCBE1-expressing oocytes, the transition from HEPES to CO2/HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> did not affect 36Cl efflux in either the absence of Na+ or presence of 0.5 mM DIDS. Thus, while NDCBE1 is mediating Na+-dependent HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> uptake, it also mediates a Cl- efflux with the properties expected of a Na+-driven Cl-HCO3 exchanger.

Increase in [Na+]i-- To determine whether NDCBE1 transports Na+, we used Na+-sensitive microelectrodes to monitor [Na+]i. In an oocyte-expressing NDCBE1, extracellular 5% CO2, 33 mM HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> caused [Na+]i to increase (Fig. 3E). The mean rate of this [Na+]i increase was substantially higher than in the presence of DIDS or in water-injected oocytes (Fig. 3F). The average, DIDS-sensitive d[Na+]i/dt was 1.01 µM s-1. In parallel experiments (not shown), we determined dpHi/dt under identical conditions, and computed the HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> pseudo-flux (Fig. 3F), the DIDS-sensitive component of which averaged 2.19 µM s-1.

Cl- Dependence of Reversed NDCBE1-- We already knew that the squid axon's Na+-driven Cl-HCO3 exchanger is very difficult to reverse (3), consistent with the slow pHi decrease in 0-Na+ in Fig. 4A. We took two steps in an attempt to speed the reversed NDCBE1. First, we coexpressed ENaC Na+ channels to increase [Na+]i. Second, we exposed the oocyte to 20% CO2 to increase [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>]i. Removing Na+ reversed NDCBE1, causing pHi to decline. However, removing extracellular Cl- reversibly blocked this decline (Fig. 4A) and caused a small hyperpolarization, as in water-injected oocytes (not shown). In water-injected oocytes (Fig. 4B), Na+ removal blocked a very slow pHi recovery (probably due to endogenous Na-H exchange at very low pHi), but Cl- removal had no effect on the pHi trajectory. Thus, the reversed NDCBE1 requires external Cl-, as expected of a Na+-driven Cl-HCO3 exchanger.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Cl- dependence of NDCBE1 expressed in Xenopus oocytes and running in reverse direction. A, NDCBE1-expressing oocytes. Oocytes were coinjected with NDCBE1 mRNA and ENaC mRNA and incubated in 20 µM amiloride. Drug was removed 1 h before experiment and returned as we introduced CO2/HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>. In presence of 20% CO2, 33 mM HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> (pHo 6.9), mean dpHi/dt was +19.0 ± 5.2 × 10-5 pH units s-1 (n = 7). During the absence of extracellular Na+, mean dpHi/dt was -6.6 ± 3.2 × 10-5 pH units s-1 (n = 7; significantly different from previous rate of pHi increase, p < 0.0001, one tail). During absence of extracellular Na+ and Cl-, mean dpHi/dt was 1.0 ± 1.4 × 10-5 pH unit s-1 (n = 7; significantly different from previous rate of pHi decrease, p < 0.0005, one tail). B, water-injected oocyte. Protocol was same as in A, except that no cRNA was injected, and no amiloride was present. Mean dpHi/dt value: just before removal of Na+, 1.3 ± 1.2 × 10-5 pH units s-1 (n = 5); during removal of Na+, -1.8 ± 1.3 × 10-5 pH units s-1 (n = 5, NS); during removal of Na+ and Cl-, 0.8 ± 1.0 × 10-5 pH units s-1 (n = 5; NS).



    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Related Transporters-- After we submitted our NDCBE1 sequence to GenBankTM, two other groups (41, 42) published partial sequences of NDCBE1, one a 2-kb fragment referred to as "NBC-3" (42). After we submitted our paper, a paper appeared by Wang et al. (43), who cloned from mouse insulinoma cells a cDNA named NCBE, 71% identical on the amino acid level to NDCBE1. Mouse NCBE's 5.5-kb transcript, like the transcripts of human NDCBE1, is robustly expressed in cerebrum and cerebellum. However, mouse NCBE mRNA is only weakly present in testis. The function of mouse NCBE is unclear. It mediates a 22Na influx that largely depends on extracellular [Cl-]. In addition, oocytes expressing this mouse clone mediate a 36Cl efflux that is only partially external Na+-dependent or DIDS-sensitive. Moreover, because no 36Cl-efflux data are available from water-injected oocytes, it is impossible to know whether the 36Cl-efflux data represent NCBE activity. Finally, no electrical data are available.

Human NDCBE1 is functionally similar to Drosophila NDAE1 (13) in that both exchange extracellular Na+ and "base" for intracellular Cl-. However, human NDCBE1 is strictly HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>-dependent, whereas Drosophila NDAE1 apparently transports OH- in the absence of HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>. Although CO2/HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> enhances pHi changes, it is not clear that Drosophila NDAE1 can transport HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>. The CO2/HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> could act strictly as a buffer, dissipating OH- unstirred layers. Another difference is that expression of Drosophila NDAE1 in oocytes is associated with a Cl- current, as well as an inward current caused by applying CO2/HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>. On the other hand, in oocytes expressing human NDCBE1, the Vm changes caused by altering [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>]o or [Cl-]o are no different than in water-injected oocytes. Because Drosophila NDAE1 and human NDCBE1 come from distantly related phyla and not closely related in terms of deduced amino acid sequence (47% identity), one must keep open the possibility that, although they appear superficially similar in some respects, Drosophila NDAE1 and human NDCBE1 may function by different molecular mechanisms (Fig. 1A).

Stoichiometry-- The ratio of net HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> and Na+ fluxes mediated by NDCBE1 was (2.19 µM s-1)/(1.01 µM s-1), or 2.17, consistent with the 2:1 stoichiometry expected of a Na+-driven Cl-HCO3 exchanger. Because NDCBE1 is electroneutral, we presume that the net Cl- efflux is the same as the net Na+ influx (Fig. 1A). However, it was impractical to measure the net Cl- efflux directly with ion-sensitive microelectrodes, because [Cl-]i is too high relative to NDBCE1 expression. However, we can calculate the unidirectional Cl- efflux from the DIDS-sensitive component of the rate constant for 36Cl efflux in NDCBE1-expressing oocytes and the resting [Cl-]i of NDAE-expressing oocytes (13): 0.00025 s-1 × 29.5 mM = 7.4 µM s-1. This unidirectional flux is ~7.3-fold higher than the expected net flux, suggesting that NDCBE1 mediates substantial Cl-Cl exchange in parallel with Na+-driven Cl-HCO3 exchange. Indeed, the unidirectional Cl- efflux from barnacle muscle fibers is also much higher than the net HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> efflux mediated by the endogenous Na+-driven Cl-HCO3 exchanger (44).

Conclusions-- We have now cloned the electroneutral Na+-driven Cl-HCO3 exchanger, the first transporter shown to regulate pHi in any cell. The heavy expression of the NDCBE1 transcript in multiple brain regions, including hippocampus, suggests that NDCBE1 plays a major role in pHi regulation in human neurons. In the rat, functional data show that the Na+-driven Cl-HCO3 exchanger is a key pHi regulator in pyramidal neurons from the hippocampal CA1 region (14). pHi is critically important for neuronal function because pHi changes substantially modulate the activity of a variety of CNS channels (45-57). Low pHi inhibits (and/or high pHi stimulates) spontaneous firing in neurons (16, 58, 59), membrane excitability (60), and epileptiform activity (61). pHi is important for CNS processes other than excitability. For example, neurite formation (62) requires HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>. Thus, NDCBE1 is in a position to influence a wide range of neuronal behaviors.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Nancy Lynn Johnston for providing us with the human brain lambda ZAPII cDNA library, Dr. Cecilia M Canessa for providing us with the ENaC cRNA, and Drs. Anne Marie Quinn, Cecilia M. Canessa, and David Ward for helpful discussions. We thank Duncan Wong for computer support.


    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant NS18400.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF069512 (for the electroneutral Na+-driven Cl-HCO3 exchanger gene).

The amino acid sequence of this protein can be accessed through NCBI Protein Database under NCBI accession number AAC82380.

§ Supported by the National Kidney Foundation. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St., New Haven, CT 06520-8026. Tel.: 203-785-5097; Fax: 203-785-4951; E-mail: ira_grich@hotmail.com.

Supported by the American Heart Association.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 27, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.C000716200


    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: EST, expressed sequence tag; RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA ends; nt, nucleotide(s); PCR, polymerase chain reaction; UTR, untranslated region; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; DIDS, 4,4'-diisothiocyanatostilbene-2,2'-disulfonic acid; bp, base pair(s); kb, kilobase(s); BAC, bacterial artificial chromosome.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES


1. Boron, W. F., and De Weer, P. (1976) Nature 259, 240-241[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Russell, J. M., and Boron, W. F. (1976) Nature 264, 73-74[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Boron, W. F., and Russell, J. M. (1983) J. Gen. Physiol. 81, 373-399[Abstract]
4. Thomas, R. C. (1976) J. Physiol. 255, 715-735[Abstract]
5. Thomas, R. C. (1976) Nature 262, 54-55[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Thomas, R. C. (1977) J. Physiol. 273, 317-338[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Boron, W. F. (1977) Am. J. Physiol. 233, C61-C73[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Boron, W. F. (1985) J. Gen. Physiol. 85, 325-345[Abstract]
9. Aalkjaer, C., and Hughes, A. (1991) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 436, 57-73[Abstract]
10. Choi, I., Aalkjaer, C., Boulpaep, E. L., and Boron, W. F. (2000) Nature 405, 571-575[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Boron, W. F., and Boulpaep, E. L. (1983) J. Gen. Physiol. 81, 53-94[Abstract]
12. Romero, M. F., Hediger, M. A., Boulpaep, E. L., and Boron, W. F. (1997) Nature 387, 409-413[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Romero, M. F., Henry, D., Nelson, S., Harte, P. J., Dillon, A. K., and Sciortino, C. M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 24552-24559[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Schwiening, C. J., and Boron, W. F. (1994) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 475, 59-67[Abstract]
15. Smith, G. A., Brett, C., and Church, J. (1998) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 512, 487-505[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Bonnet, U., Leniger, T., and Wiemann, M. (2000) Brain Res. 872, 116-124[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Ko, Y. P., Lang, H. J., Loh, S. H., Chu, K. C., and Wu, M. L. (1999) Chin. J. Physiol. 42, 237-248[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Shrode, L. D., and Putnam, R. W. (1994) Glia 12, 196-210[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Boyarsky, G., Ganz, M. B., Sterzel, B., and Boron, W. F. (1988) Am. J. Physiol. 255, C857-C869[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Lane, J., Wigham, C. G., and Hodson, S. A. (2000) Biophys. J. 78, 2493-2498[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Strazzabosco, M., Joplin, R., Zsembery, A., Wallace, L., Spirli, C., Fabris, L., Granato, A., Rossanese, A., Poci, C., Neuberger, J. M., Okolicsanyi, L., and Crepaldi, G. (1997) Hepatology 25, 976-985[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Faber, S., Lang, H. J., Hock, F. J., Scholkens, B. A., and Mutschler, E. (1998) Cell Physiol. Biochem. 8, 202-211[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Zeng, Y., Oberdorf, J. A., and Florman, H. M. (1996) Dev. Biol. 173, 510-520[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Kaplan, D., and Boron, W. F. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 4116-4124[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Ladoux, A., Krawice, I., Cragoe, E. J., Jr., Abita, J. P., and Frelin, C. (1987) Eur. J. Biochem. 170, 43-49[Abstract]
26. Kottgen, M., Leipziger, J., Fischer, K. G., Nitschke, R., and Greger, R. (1994) Pflügers Arch. 428, 179-185[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Trudeau, M. C., Warmke, J. W., Ganetzky, B., and Robertson, G. A. (1995) Science 269, 92-95[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Francke, U. (1994) Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 65, 206-218[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Grichtchenko, I. I., Romero, M. F., and Boron, W. F. (2000) J. Gen. Physiol. 115, 533-545[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Siebens, A. W., and Boron, W. F. (1987) J. Gen. Physiol. 90, 799-831[Abstract]
31. Chao, P., Ammann, D., Oesch, U., Simon, W., and Lang, F. (1988) Pflügers Arch. 411, 216-219[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Romero, M. F., Fong, P., Berger, U. V., Hediger, M. A., and Boron, W. F. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 274, F425-F432[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Kopito, R. R., Lee, B. S., Simmons, D. M., Lindsey, A. E., Morgans, C. W., and Schneider, K. (1989) Cell 59, 927-937[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Okubo, K., Kang, D., Hamasaki, N., and Jennings, M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 1918-1926[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Abuladze, N., Lee, I., Newman, D., Hwang, J., Boorer, K., Pushkin, A., and Kurtz, I. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 17689-17695[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Pushkin, A., Abuladze, N., Lee, I., Newman, D., Hwang, J., and Kurtz, I. (1999) Genomics 57, 321-322[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Choi, I., Romero, M. F., Khandoudi, N., Bril, A., and Boron, W. F. (1999) Am. J. Physiol. 276, C576-C584[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Pushkin, A., Abuladze, N., Lee, I., Newman, D., Hwang, J., and Kurtz, I. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 16569-16575[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Boron, W. F., and De Weer, P. (1976) J. Gen. Physiol. 67, 91-112[Abstract]
40. Bevensee, M. O., Schmitt, B. M., Choi, I., Romero, M. F., and Boron, W. F. (2000) Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 278, C1200-C1211[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Nagase, T., Ishikawa, K., Suyama, M., Kikuno, R., Hirosawa, M., Miyajima, N., Tanaka, A., Kotani, H., Nomura, N., and Ohara, O. (1998) DNA Res. 5, 355-364[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Amlal, H., Burnham, C. E., and Soleimani, M. (1999) Am. J. Physiol. 276, F903-F913[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Wang, C. Z., Yano, H., Nagashima, K., and Seino, S. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 35486-35490[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Boron, W. F., Russell, J. M., Brodwick, M. S., Keifer, D. W., and Roos, A. (1978) Nature 276, 511-513[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Daumas, P., and Andersen, O. S. (1993) J. Gen. Physiol. 101, 27-43[Abstract]
46. Xu, H., Cui, N., Yang, Z., Qu, Z., and Jiang, C. (2000) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 524 Pt 3, 725-735[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Zhu, G., Liu, C., Qu, Z., Chanchevalap, S., Xu, H., and Jiang, C. (2000) J. Cell. Physiol. 183, 53-64[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Frey, G., Hanke, W., and Schlue, W.-R. (1993) J. Membr. Biol. 134, 131-142[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Pedersen, K. A., Jorgensen, N. K., Jensen, B. S., and Olesen, S. P. (2000) Pflügers Arch. 440, 153-156[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Church, J., Baxter, K. A., and McLarnon, J. G. (1998) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 511, 119-132[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51. Dixon, D. B., Takahashi, K., and Copenhagen, D. R. (1993) Neuron 11, 267-277[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52. Kiss, L., and Korn, S. J. (1999) J. Neurophysiol. 81, 1839-1847[Abstract/Free Full Text]
53. Tombaugh, G. C., and Somjen, G. G. (1997) J. Neurophysiol. 77, 639-653[Abstract/Free Full Text]
54. Wang, X. G., and Peracchia, C. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 275, C1384-C1390[Abstract/Free Full Text]
55. Bruzzone, R., White, T. W., and Paul, D. L. (1996) Eur. J. Biochem. 238, 1-27[Abstract]
56. Spray, D. C., Harris, A. L., and Bennett, M. V. L. (1981) Science 211, 712-715[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
57. Rozental, R., Giaume, C., and Spray, D. C. (2000) Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 32, 11-15[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
58. Bonnet, U., and Wiemann, M. (1999) Brain Res. 840, 16-22[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
59. Meyer, T. M., Munsch, T., and Pape, H. C. (2000) Neuroreport 11, 33-37[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
60. Church, J. (1992) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 455, 51-71[Abstract]
61. Xiong, Z. Q., Saggau, P., and Stringer, J. L. (2000) J. Neurosci. 20, 1290-1296[Abstract/Free Full Text]
62. Kostenko, M. A., Musienko, V. S., and Smolikhina, T. I. (1983) Brain Res. 276, 43-50[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
63. Romero, M. F., and Boron, W. F. (1998) J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 9, 11A
64. Kopito, R. R., and Lodish, H. F. (1985) Nature 316, 234-238[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
65. Roos, A., and Boron, W. F. (1981) Physiol. Rev. 61, 296-434[Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.