Estrogen Receptor-mediated Activation of the Serum Response Element in MCF-7 Cells through MAPK-dependent Phosphorylation of Elk-1*

Renqin Duan, Wen Xie, Robert C. Burghardt, and Stephen SafeDagger

From the Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas 77843-4466

Received for publication, June 22, 2000, and in revised form, November 13, 2000



    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

17beta -Estradiol (E2) induces c-fos protooncogene expression in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells, and deletion analysis of the c-fos promoter showed that the serum response element (SRE) at -325 to -296 was E2-responsive. The mechanism of ligand-activated estrogen receptor alpha  (ERalpha )-dependent activation of gene expression through the SRE was determined by mutational analysis of the promoter, analysis of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway activation by E2, and transforming growth factor alpha  (TGF-alpha ) as a positive control. In addition, ERalpha -negative MDA-MB-231 breast cancer and Chinese hamster ovary cells were used as reference cell lines. The results showed that transcriptional activation of the SRE by E2 was due to ERalpha activation of the MAPK pathway and increased binding of the serum response factor and Elk-1 to the SRE. Subsequent studies with dominant negative Elk-1, wild type, and variant GAL4-Elk-1 fusion proteins confirmed that phosphorylation of Elk-1 at serines 383 and 389 in the C-terminal region of Elk-1 is an important downstream target associated with activation of an SRE by E2. Both E2 (ERalpha -dependent) and growth factors (ERalpha -independent) activated the SRE in breast cancer cells via the Ras/MAPK pathway; however, in ER-negative CHO cells that do not express a receptor for TGF-alpha , only hormone-induced activation was observed in cells transfected with ERalpha .



    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

c-fos protooncogene plays an important role in regulation of normal cell growth, differentiation, and cellular transformation processes (1-4). c-fos is a prototypical "immediate early" gene that is rapidly induced in response to diverse extracellular stimuli including various mitogens and the steroid hormones during the early phases of recruitment of quiescent (G0) cells in the cell cycle (5-28). Homozygous c-fos-/- mice, although viable, are growth-retarded and develop osteopetrosis, with deficiencies in bone remodeling and tooth eruption (29). The failure to observe a more compromised phenotype could be due to redundancy and compensation by other Fos-related proteins. c-Fos, Jun, and related transcription factors are nuclear phosphoproteins that share common modular organization consisting of multiple, separable domains each with a defined structure and function (30, 31). The "leucine zipper" and an adjacent basic region are required for protein-protein and region-specific DNA interactions that are required for hetero- and homodimerization of Ap1 proteins to form the activating protein (activating protein 1) transcription factor complex that regulates expression of multiple genes, including those involved in cell growth, differentiation, and transformation (4).

Transcriptional regulation of c-fos protooncogene is modulated, in part, by interactions of nuclear proteins with multiple cis-elements in the c-fos gene promoter (30-34). Proximal to the c-fos TATA box is a cAMP response element that binds cAMP response element-binding protein or ATF proteins that mediate c-fos induction in response to neurotransmitters and polypeptide hormones. This response uses either cAMP or Ca2+ as second messengers to activate either protein kinase A- or calmodulin-dependent protein kinases, respectively (35).

Another cis element that regulates c-fos transcription is a Sis-inducible enhancer (SIE)1 that is recognized by the signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) group of transcription factors (36). STATs are activated and translocated to the nucleus in response to signals that activate the Janus kinase group of tyrosine kinases (37). A third cis element, called the serum response element (SRE), mediates c-fos induction by growth factors, cytokines, and other extracellular stimuli that activate MAPK pathways (30-34). SRE is recognized by a dimer of the serum response factor (SRF), whose binding recruits the monomeric ternary complex factors (TCFs) that cannot bind SRE alone (30). TCFs have at least three members, including SAP1 (SRF accessory protein), Elk-1, and SAP2, that form a subgroup of the Ets family of transcription factors (30).

The downstream -178 to -144 region of the fos promoter is also required for induction of fos gene expression by vitamin D in osteoblastic cells, and this response was associated with binding of the vitamin D receptor and CTF/NF-1 proteins to a composite response element (38). Several studies have also demonstrated that another member of the nuclear receptor superfamily, estrogen receptor alpha  (ERalpha ), also mediates 17beta -estradiol (E2)-activated expression of c-fos, which is induced as an immediate early gene in ERalpha -positive breast cancer cell lines (22-28, 39). Research in this laboratory showed that interaction of an ERalpha -Sp1 complex with a GC-rich site in the distal region (39) of the c-fos gene promoter was required for estrogen action in breast cancer cells. Further analysis of this promoter for elements required for growth factor and hormone responsiveness showed that transactivation by both mitogens was observed using constructs containing the SRE. ERalpha activation through the SRE involved the MAPK signaling pathway and subsequent phosphorylation of Elk-1 and showed that hormone-induced c-fos expression in breast cancer cells involves ERalpha action at two elements (GC-rich and SRE) that do not require direct receptor/DNA interactions.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Chemicals, Cells, Antibodies, Oligonucleotides, and Plasmids-- MCF-7, MDA-MBA-231, and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA). Cells were routinely maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's/F-12 medium with phenol red and supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum plus 10 ml of antibiotic-antimycotic solution (Sigma) in an air/carbon dioxide (95:5) atmosphere at 37 °C. For transient transfection studies, cells were grown for 1 day in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's/F-12 medium without phenol red and 5% fetal bovine serum treated with dextran-coated charcoal. The wild-type human ER (hER) expression plasmid was provided by Dr. Ming-Jer Tsai (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX). the IGF-1 receptor antagonist, H1356 (amino acids CYAAPLKPAKSC) (40) was provided by Sigma-Genosys. Human recombinant TGF-alpha , IGF-1, and E2 were purchased from Sigma, and PD98059 was purchased from Calbiochem-Novabiochem. SRF, SAP1, Elk-1, and ERK1 antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). Active ERK1 antibody was purchased from Promega Corp. (Madison, WI). The ER deletion mutants HE11, HE15, and HE19 were provided by Dr. Pierre Chambon (Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Illkirch, France). The dominant negative (dn) Elk, dn Ras N17, and inhibitory MAPK expression plasmids were kindly provided by Dr. Roger Davis (University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA), Dr. Joseph Baldassare (St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO), and Dr. Arthur Gutierrez-Hartmann (University of Colorado, Denver, CO), respectively. The plasmids GAL-ElkC and GAL-ElkC(383/389) were received from Dr. Roger Treisman (Imperial Cancer Research Center, London, United Kingdom). pFC2-BLCAT plasmid, which contains the -1400 to +41 5'-flanking sequence from the human c-fos gene linked to a bacterial CAT reporter gene, was kindly provided by Dr. Alessandro Weisz (Universita di Napoli, Naples, Italy) (23). ICI 182,780 was provided by Alan Wakeling (Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, Macclesfield, UK). Me2SO was used as solvent for E2 and the antiestrogens. All other chemicals and biochemicals were of the highest quality available from commercial sources.

Oligonucleotides derived from the c-fos protooncogene promoter and other oligonucleotides were synthesized by the Gene Technologies Laboratory, Texas A & M University (College Station, TX). The complementary strands were annealed, and the 5'-overhangs were used for cloning. The structures of these oligonucleotides are summarized as follows, and the SIE and SRE sites are underlined (mutations incorporated into mutant oligonucleotides are denoted by asterisks): SS (SIE/SRE) (-354/-296) (sense strand), 5'-AGC TTG AGC AGT TCC CGT CAA TCC CTC CCC CCT TAC ACA GGA TGT CCA TAT TAG GAC ATC TGC G-3'; SRE (-325/-296) (sense strand), 5'-AGC TTA CAC AGG ATG TCC ATA TTA GGA CAT CTG CG-3'; SRE.m1 (-325/-296) (sense strand), 5'-AGC TTG* T*AC T*GT* ATG TCC ATA TTA GGA CAT CTG CG-3'; SRE.m2 (-325/-296) (sense strand), 5'-AGC TTA CAC AGG ATG TCG* C*A*A TC*G* C*GA CAT CTG CG-3'; a perfect palindromic 17-mer GAL4 binding site (17M) (sense strand) (41), 5'-CGG AGG ACT GTC CTC CG-3'.

SIE/SRE, SRE, SRE.m1, and SRE.m2 oligonucleotides and five copies of 17M were cloned into the pBLTATA-CAT vector at the HindIII and BamHI sites to give the pSS, pSRE, pSRE.m1, pSRE.m2, and GAL4-CAT constructs, respectively, as previously described.

Transient Transfection and CAT Assays-- MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and CHO cells were transiently transfected, utilizing the calcium phosphate method with 5 µg of c-fos gene promoter-derived constructs and 2.5 µg (MCF-7 cells) or 5 µg (MDA-MB-231 cells) of wild-type or variant ER expression plasmids plus 1 µg of lacZ expression plasmid as an internal control for transfection efficiency. pCDNA3-Neo (InVitrogen, Inc., Carlsbad, CA) was utilized as an empty vector (control) and was also added in some experiments to maintain uniform levels of added DNA. After 18 h, the medium was changed, and cells were treated with Me2SO (0.2% total volume), 10 nM E2, 10 nM TGF-alpha , 10 nM IGF-1, 1 µM ICI 182,780, or other compounds or their combinations in Me2SO for 44 h. Cells were then washed with phosphate-buffered saline and scraped from the plates. Cell lysates were prepared in 0.15 ml of 0.25 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) by three freeze-thaw-sonication cycles (3 min each). Protein concentrations were determined using bovine serum albumin as a standard, and analysis for CAT activity in cell lysates was standardized to beta -galactosidase activity. Lysates were incubated at 56 °C for 7 min to remove endogenous deacetylase activity. CAT activity was determined by incubating aliquots of the cell lysates with 0.2 mCi of D-threo-[dichloroacetyl-1-14C]chloramphenicol and 4 mM acetyl-CoA. Acetylation was allowed to proceed to <20-25% completion (linear range), and acetylated metabolites were analyzed by TLC. Following TLC, acetylated products were visualized and quantitated using an Instant Imager analyzer. CAT activity was calculated as fraction of that observed in cells treated with Me2SO alone (arbitrarily set at 100), and results are expressed as means ± S.D. The experiments were carried out at least in triplicate and statistical significance was determined by analysis of variance and Scheffe's test.

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays-- Synthetic oligonucleotides were synthesized, purified, annealed, and 32P-labeled as previously described (39). DNA binding was measured using a gel retardation assay. Nuclear extracts from MCF-7 cells treated with Me2SO, 10 nM E2, or 10 nM TGF-alpha for 30 min were incubated in HEGD buffer (2.5 mM HEPES, 1.5 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 1.0 mM dithiothreitol, pH 7.6) with poly(dI-dC) (200 ng) for 15 min at 20 °C. The mixture was then incubated for an additional 15 min (20 °C) after the addition of 32P-labeled DNA. Aliquots from reaction mixtures were then loaded into a 5% polyacrylamine gel (acrylamide/bisacrylamide, 30:0.8) and electrophoresed at 110 V in 0.9 M Tris borate and 2 mM EDTA, pH 8.0. The gel was dried, and protein/DNA interactions were determined and quantitated by scanning on a Betascope 603 blot analyzer imaging system and visualized by autoradiography.

Western Immunoblotting-- Nonphosphorylated and phosphorylated Elk-1 antibodies were purchased from New England Biolabs, and ERalpha antibodies were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. The plasmid expressing Elk-1 (from Dr. R. Ianknecht, The Salk Institute) and hER was transiently transfected into MCF-7 cells using calcium phosphate; 18 h after transfection, cells were incubated in serum-free medium for 36 h and were then treated with chemicals and harvested at designated time points. Cells were washed once in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and collected by scraping in 0.3 ml of ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 50 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 50 mM sodium orthovanadate). The lysates were incubated on ice for 1 h with intermittent vortexing followed by centrifugation (15,000 × g, 5 min). Equal amounts of protein from each treatment group were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (7.5% gel, 150 V) and electrophoresed (15 V, overnight) to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane using a Bio-Rad Trans-Blot Electrophoretic Transfer Cell and transfer buffer (48 mM Tris, 39 mM glysine, 0.025% SDS). Subsequent procedures followed the manufacturer's recommendation (New England Biolabs). The lysates were also used for immunoblotting for ERKs and active ERKs. However, subsequent procedures followed different manufacturers' recommendations (Promega for active ERKs; Santa Cruz Biotechnology for ERKs and ERalpha ).

Fluorescence Immunocytochemistry-- CHO-K1 cells were subcultured in four-well Lab-Tek chambered slides (Nunc Inc., Naperville, IL) in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's/F-12 medium without phenol red 5% fetal bovine serum stripped with dextran-coated charcoal. After 24 h, cells were transiently transfected with 1 µg of hER or HE 11 expression plasmids. Transfections were done with SuperFect Transfection Reagent (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA); cells were incubated with DNA-SuperFect Transfection Reagent complexes at 37 °C for 3 h, followed by 24 h of recovery in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's/F-12 medium. Prior to fixation, slides were washed three times in Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) and then fixed for 10 min at room temperature in 2% paraformaldehyde in DPBS and 0.15 M sucrose in the presence or absence of 0.5% Nonidet P-40 for detection of nuclear and membrane ERalpha , respectively. Slides were subsequently washed three times in DPBS followed by a 10-min incubation in 100 mM ammonium chloride before a 1-h blocking step in 3% normal goat serum (G-9023; Sigma). For nuclear localization of ERalpha , the rat mAb raised against the ligand binding domain of the human ERalpha (H222; a generous gift of Dr. Geoffrey Greene) was diluted to a final concentration of 3 µg/ml in DPBS containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin, 0.1% goat serum, and 0.3% Tween 20. Rat IgG at the same concentration was used as a control. Tween 20 (0.3%) was included in all antibody, blocking steps, and washes for nuclear localization of ERalpha , whereas it was excluded from all incubations for membrane ERalpha localization. Following incubation in H222 antibody overnight, cells were washed three times in DPBS. Cells were then incubated for 1 h in a 1:200 dilution fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat-anti-rat IgG (62-9511; Zymed Laboratories Inc., S. San Francisco, CA) in DPBS containing 0.1% goat serum. Cells were then washed six times over a period of 2 h and transferred to distilled water prior to coverslip mounting with ProLong Antifade mounting reagent (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, OR). For each treatment, representative fluorescence images were recorded using a Zeiss Axioplan microscope (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY) equipped with a Hamamatsu chilled 3CCD color camera (Hamamatsu, Japan) using Adobe Photoshop 5.0 (Adobe Systems, Seattle, WA) image capture software. Images from all treatment groups were captured at the same time using identical image capture parameters.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Transactivation of c-fos-derived Constructs by E2 and Growth Factors in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 Cells-- Both E2 and growth factors induce c-fos protooncogene expression in MCF-7 cells (22-27, 39), and initial studies showed that in cells transfected with pFC2 (containing the -1400 to +41 region of the c-fos promoter), E2 alone (10-100 nM) induced a maximal 90% increase in CAT activity. 10 nM IGF or TGF-alpha alone also significantly increased CAT activity in MCF-7 cells transfected with pFC2. In cells treated with 10 nM E2, IGF, or TGF-alpha plus hERalpha expression plasmid, the induction was further enhanced compared with treatment with E2, IGF, or TGF-alpha alone (Fig. 1A). In ER-negative MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with pFC2, no induction response was observed after treatment with E2 alone; however, E2 induced CAT activity in this cell line after cotransfection with ERalpha expression plasmid (Fig. 1B). Since cotransfection with ERalpha enhanced E2 responsiveness in transient transfection assays, ERalpha expression plasmid was routinely used in studies with the c-fos-derived constructs. Previous studies identified a distal E2-responsive GC-rich site (-1168 to -1161) that was activated through ERalpha /Sp1 interactions (39); however, in MCF-7 cells cotransfected with ERalpha and pSS containing a more proximal fos gene promoter insert (-354 to -296), both E2 and TGF-alpha induced reporter gene activity (Fig. 1C). Moreover, in cells cotreated with the ER antagonist ICI 182,780, only E2-induced transactivation was inhibited. In the absence of cotransfected ERalpha , only TGF-alpha induced CAT activity, and ICI 182,780 did not inhibit this response (data not shown). Previous studies (12, 14-20) in other cell lines have demonstrated that this region of the fos gene promoter is activated by multiple mitogenic compounds, but this is the first report of transcriptional activation by E2.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Transactivation of c-fos-derived constructs by E2 and growth factors in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells. Shown are effects of E2 and growth factors on CAT activity in MCF-7 (A) and MDA-MB-231 (B) cells transiently transfected with pFC2-BLCAT plus or minus hER expression plasmids. MCF-7 cells were transiently transfected with pFC2-BLCAT and treated with Me2SO (CTL), 10-100 nM E2, 10 nM IGF-1, or TGF-alpha , and CAT activity was determined as described under "Experimental Procedures." Relative intensities of acetylated products in E2 and TGF-alpha groups are compared with the control group, and relative intensities that are significantly higher than that in controls are indicated (*). Results are means ± S.D. for three separate determinations. C, the effect of ICI 182,780 on E2- and TGF-alpha -induced CAT activity in MCF-7 cells transiently transfected with pSS and hER expression plasmids. MCF-7 cells were transiently transfected with pSS and hER expression plasmid and treated with Me2SO (DMSO), 10 nM E2, 10 nM TGF-alpha , 1 µM ICI 182,780, or their combinations, and CAT activity was determined as described under "Experimental Procedures." Significant (p < 0.05) induction (*) was observed for E2 and TGF-alpha , but only CAT activity induced by E2 was inhibited by ICI 182,780 (**). Results were determined in triplicate (three separate experiments) and expressed as means ± S.D.

The -354 to -296 region of the fos gene promoter does not contain an estrogen-responsive element, and DNA binding of ERalpha was not observed in a gel mobility shift assay (data not shown). The requirement for the DNA binding domain of ERalpha for estrogen action was further investigated in MCF-7 and ER-negative MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with pSS plus wild-type ERalpha , mutant HE11 (DNA binding domain deletion), HE15 (expressing AF1), or mutant HE19 (expressing AF2) expression plasmids (Fig. 2B). E2-induced reporter gene activity in both cell lines only after cotransfection of wild-type ERalpha or HE11, confirming that DNA binding was not required for transactivation and that both AF1 and AF2 domains of ERalpha were required for an induction response.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Effects of wild-type or variant ER on CAT activity induced by E2 in MCF-7 (A) or MDA-MB-231 (B) cells cotransfected with pSS or pSRE plus wild-type or variant ERalpha . The transient transfection and CAT assays were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." Cells were treated with Me2SO (light bars) or 10 nM E2 (dark bars). *, the relative induction response was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than in controls. Results were determined in triplicate (three separate experiments) and expressed as means ± S.D.

Kinase-dependent Activation of fos-derived Promoter Constructs pSS (-354/-296) and pSRE (-325/-296)-- Previous studies have shown that, like growth factors, E2 activates the MAPK and other kinase-dependent pathways (42-48), and the results in Fig. 2 suggest a kinase-dependent activation pathway. Fig. 3A summarizes the effects of the MAPK kinase inhibitor, PD98059, on induction of CAT activity by 10 nM E2, 10 nM IGF, or 10 nM TGF-alpha in MCF-7 cells transfected with pSS and ERalpha expression plasmid. TGF-alpha , IGF, and E2 induce reporter gene activity, and PD98059 inhibits this response. In the absence of ERalpha , E2 is inactive, whereas TGF-alpha and IGF induce CAT activity and PD98059 inhibits this response (data not shown). Activation of pSS by E2 was also inhibited after cotransfection with dominant negative expression plasmids for MAPK or ras (Fig. 3B). The -254 to -296 region of the fos gene promoter contains an upstream SIE and a downstream SRE that is composed of two binding sites: an SRF site for binding an SRF dimer and a TCF site that binds Ets family transcription factors, SAP1, SAP2, and Elk-1 (32). Deletion analysis of pSS (Fig. 3C) showed that pSRE (-325 to -296 fos gene promoter insert) alone retained E2 responsiveness; however, mutation of either the TCF or SRF binding sites resulted in loss of hormone-mediated transactivation. In addition, cotransfection of pSRE with dominant negative MAPK or ras expression plasmids resulted in loss of inducibility by E2 (Fig. 3D), suggesting that the SRE region of the fos gene promoter was sufficient for E2 action, and inducibility was associated with activation of the Ras/MAPK pathway. Previous studies in ER-negative CHO cells showed that transfection with ERalpha also resulted in activation of the Ras/MAPK pathway via membrane ERalpha (45); the results in Fig. 3E illustrate that transfection of CHO cells with hER (or HE11) also activates pSRE as noted in Fig. 2 for both MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Activation of c-fos-derived constructs by E2 and growth factors is dependent on the Ras/MAPK pathway. A, effect of PD98059 on E2- and growth factor-induced CAT activity. MCF-7 cells were transiently transfected with pSS and hER expression plasmid and treated with Me2SO (DMSO), 10 nM E2, 10 nM IGF-1 or TGF-alpha , 50 µM PD98059, or their combinations, and CAT activity was determined as described under "Experimental Procedures." Significant (p < 0.05) induction (*) was observed for E2, IGF-1, and TGF-alpha , and PD98059 inhibited both E2- and growth factor-induced CAT activity (**). All data presented in this figure were derived from at least three separate experiments and are expressed as means ± S.D. B, effects of dominant negative Ras or MAPK on CAT activity induced by E2. MCF-7 cells were cotransfected with pSS plus dn Ras N-17 and MAPK expression plasmids, or an empty vector pLNCX (as control) (total amount of DNA was kept constant). The transient transfection and CAT assays were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." Cells were treated with Me2SO (light bars) or 10 nM E2 (dark bars). *, the relative intensity was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than in control. C, effects of E2 on CAT activity in MCF-7 cells transiently transfected with pSS, pSRE, pSRE.m1, or pSRE.m2. MCF-7 cells were transiently transfected with the various plasmids and treated with Me2SO or 10 nM E2, and CAT activity was determined as described under "Experimental Procedures." Significant (p < 0.05) induction (*) was observed for E2 with pSS or pSRE but not with pSRE1.m1 or pSRE.m2. D, effects of dominant negative Ras or MAPK expression on CAT activity induced by E2 in MCF-7 cells transiently transfected with pSRE and hER expression plasmid. MCF-7 cells were cotransfected with pSRE plus dn Ras N-17 and MAPK expression plasmids or an empty vector pLNCX (as control) (total amount of DNA was kept constant). The transient transfection and CAT assays were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." Cells were treated with Me2SO (light bars) or 10 nM E2 (dark bars). *, the relative intensity was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than in control. E, pSRE activity in CHO cells cotransfected with wild-type and variant ERalpha . This experiment was carried out as described in Fig. 2, and E2 induced CAT activity (p < 0.001) only after cotransfection with wild-type ERalpha or HE11.

Protein Interactions with the c-fos SRE in Gel Mobility Shift Assays-- Protein binding to the SRE was investigated using [32P]SS containing the -354 to -296 region of the fos gene promoter. After incubation of the radiolabeled oligonucleotide with nuclear extracts from untreated MCF-7 cells, analysis by gel mobility shift assay showed three major bands (C1, C2, and C3) (Fig. 4A, lane 1), and the intensity of these bands was increased after incubation with extracts from MCF-7 cells treated with 10 nM E2 (lane 2) or 10 nM TGF-alpha (lane 3) for 30 min. In antibody supershift studies using nuclear extracts from E2-treated MCF-7 cells (Fig. 4B, lane 1), band C3 was supershifted with SRF and Elk-1 antibodies; bands C1 and C2 were also supershifted with SRF antibody, whereas SAP1 antibody did not give a supershifted band. These data are consistent with results of previous gel shift assays showing that the least mobile C3 band is the ternary complex composed of SRF dimer and Elk-1, whereas C2 is the SRF homodimer (49, 50).



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Treatment of MCF-7 cells with E2 and TGF-alpha enhanced formation of ternary complex composed of SRF and Elk-1. A, treatment of MCF-7 cells with E2 and TGF-alpha enhanced protein-DNA complex C3. Gel shift analysis was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures" using 3 µg of nuclear extracts from MCF-7 cells treated with Me2SO (DMSO), 10 nM E2, or 10 nM TGF-alpha for 30 min. The retarded protein-DNA complex bands (see arrows) were visualized by autoradiography. B, protein-DNA complex C3 is a ternary complex composed of SRF and Elk-1. Gel shift analysis was performed as described for A, and 3 µg of nuclear extracts from MCF-7 cells treated with 10 nM for 30 min were used. The retarded protein-DNA complex bands (see arrows) were visualized by autoradiography.

Phosphorylation and Activation of Elk-1 by E2 via ER-dependent MAPK Pathway-- Previous studies showed that the C-terminal domain of Elk-1 is phosphorylated by MAPK at multiple sites, and this C-terminal region (Elk-1, amino acids 307-428) can function as a transactivation domain when fused to the DNA binding domain of GAL4 (49). Both E2 and TGF-alpha induced CAT activity in MCF-7 cells transfected with ERalpha expression plasmid, the GAL-ElkC fusion protein, and GAL4-dependent promoter construct (GAL4-CAT) (Fig. 5A). In contrast, induction was not observed using a reporter without the GAL4 response elements (i.e. TATA-CAT empty vector). Transcriptional activation by E2 or TGF-alpha was not observed in the GAL-ElkC fusion protein containing mutations at serines 383 and 389 that are important for transactivation (49) (GAL-ElkC(383/389)). Results shown in Fig. 5B also demonstrate that E2 alone (10-100 nM) induced reporter gene activity in MCF-7 cells transfected with GAL-ElkC and GAL4-CAT, and this response was enhanced after cotransfection with ERalpha expression plasmid. Similar results were obtained using pFC2 (Fig. 1A) in which the activity of E2 alone was enhanced by transfection with ERalpha . Transcriptional activation of the GAL-ElkC fusion protein was further investigated in MCF-7 cells transiently transfected with GAL-ElkC, GAL4-CAT, and ERalpha and treated with various reagents (Fig. 5C). E2, IGF, and TGF-alpha induced CAT activity, and these responses were inhibited by PD98059 (MAPK inhibitor), whereas the antiestrogen ICI 182,780 inhibited E2-induced but not IGF- or TGF-alpha -induced CAT activity. Razandi et al. (45) previously showed that transfection of CHO cells with ERalpha activated the MAPK pathway, and results in Fig. 5D demonstrate that the pattern of GAL-ElkC activation by E2 in CHO cells is similar to that observed in MCF-7 cells (Fig. 5C). E2 induces CAT activity in CHO cells transfected with GAL4-CAT and GAL-ElkC, and this response is inhibited by both ICI 182,780 and PD98059. In contrast, TGF-alpha is inactive in this cell line as previously reported (45) due to a nonfunctional receptor for this mitogen.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Activation of Elk-1 by E2 is ER- and MAPK-dependent. A, E2 and TGF-alpha induced Elk-1-mediated transcriptional activation. MCF-7 cells were transiently cotransfected with GAL4-CAT plus GAL-ElkC, GAL-ElkC (383/389), or GAL4-DBD or with TATA-CAT plus GAL-ElkC and then treated with Me2SO (CTL), 10 nM E2, or 10 nM TGF-alpha . *, the relative intensity was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than in control. Results were determined in triplicate (three separate experiments) and expressed as means ± S.D. B, effect of ERalpha cotransfection. MCF-7 cells were transfected with GAL4-CAT/GAL-ElkC treated with 10-100 nM E2 in the presence or absence of cotransfected ERalpha expression plasmid as described under "Experimental Procedures." E2 alone (50 and 100 nM) significantly induced CAT activity, and this response was enhanced after cotransfection with ERalpha . Results were determined in triplicate and are presented as means ± S.E. Effects of ICI 182,780 and PD98059 on E2- or growth factor-induced CAT activity in MCF-7 (C) or CHO (D) cells cotransfected with GAL4-CAT and GAL-ElkC plasmids are shown. Transfection and CAT assays were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." *, the relative intensity was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than in control. **, the relative intensity was significantly lower (p < 0.001) than in cells treated with E2 or growth factors. Results were determined in triplicate (three separate experiments) and expressed as means ± S.D.

Hormone-induced activation of pSRE via MAPK-dependent activation of Elk-1 was further confirmed by showing that induction of CAT activity in MCF-7 cells transfected with pSRE was decreased by cotransfection with dominant negative Elk-1 expression plasmid (Fig. 6A). The effects of 10 nM E2 and EGF alone and in combination with cotransfected ERalpha on ERK1/2 phosphorylation were determined in whole cell extracts (Fig. 6B), and both E2 and EGF alone induced phosphorylation (active ERK1/2). ERK1/2 phosphorylation was enhanced 60-100% in extracts from cells transfected with ERalpha expression plasmid, and this was consistent with increased activation of constructs in transient transfection assays using ERalpha expression plasmids. Moreover, since not all cells are transfected, increased phosphorylation of ERK1/2 by ERalpha would be higher in transfected cells than observed for the whole cell extracts (Fig. 6B). The effects of E2, E2 plus ICI 182,780, and E2 plus PD98059 on immunoreactive ERK1 and ERK2 and the corresponding active proteins (P-ERKs) were also determined (Fig. 6C). E2 (and TGF-alpha , data not shown) induced immunoreactive levels of active-ERK1 and active-ERK2, and this response was inhibited by ICI 182,780 and PD98059, whereas the effects of TGF-alpha were not affected by ICI 182,780 (data not shown). These results paralleled activation of pSRE by E2 and TGF-alpha and confirmed that both mitogens activate kinase-dependent signaling that converge on MAPK-dependent phosphorylation and activation of proteins binding the SRE in the fos gene promoter. The specific effects of ICI 182,780 on ERalpha -mediated responses are consistent with hormone-dependent activation of pSRE and the MAPK pathway through an ERalpha -dependent pathway (42, 45). The effects of E2 on immunoreactive Elk-1 and phosphorylated Elk-1 proteins were also investigated (Fig. 6D) in MCF-7 cells; treatment with E2, E2 plus ICI 182,780, E2 plus PD98059, and TGF-alpha did not affect levels of immunoreactive Elk-1 protein, whereas E2 induced phosphorylation of Elk-1 (P-Elk-1), and this response was inhibited by ICI 182,780 and PD98059. As a positive control, TGF-alpha also induced P-Elk-1.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and Elk-1 and its role in E2-induced activation of pSRE. A, effects of dominant negative Elk on E2-induced CAT activity. MCF-7 cells were cotransfected with pSRE plus various amounts of dn Elk expression plasmids or an empty vector pCDNA3 (as control) (total amount of DNA was kept constant). The transient transfection and CAT assays were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." Cells were treated with Me2SO (DMSO, light bars) or 10 nM E2 (dark bars). *, the relative intensity was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than in control. B, activation of ERK1/2. Whole cell extracts were obtained from MCF-7 cells treated with solvent control (CTL), 10 nM E2, and TGF-alpha in the presence or absence of cotransfected ERalpha , and immunoblot analysis of activated ERK1/2, ERK1/2, and ERalpha was carried out as described under "Experimental Procedures." Cotransfection with ERalpha increased ERK1/2 activation by 60-100%, and levels of ERalpha protein were also increased; replicate (two) experiments gave similar results. Shown are effects of PD98059 and ICI 182,780 on E2-induced active ERKs (C) and phosphorylation of Elk-1 (D) in MCF-7 cells. Western immunoblottings were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." The lysates were obtained from MCF-7 cells treated with Me2SO, E2, or TGF-alpha for 15 min or cotreated with ICI 183,780 or PD98059 for 4 h plus E2 or TGF-alpha for 15 min.

Role of Cytosolic ERalpha Interaction with the IGF-1 Receptor and Detection of Membrane ER in Transfected CHO-K1 Cells-- The results illustrated in Fig. 7, A and B, demonstrate that E2, IGF, and TGF-alpha activate pSRE and GAL-ElkC in ER-positive ZR75 and T47D breast cancer cells. Thus, E2 and growth factors activate this kinase-dependent pathway in three ER-positive breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7, ZR75, and T47D), ER-negative MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells, and CHO cells, indicating that this response is not confined to one or two breast cancer cell lines. A recent study (51) reported that E2 also activated MAPK signaling in ER-negative COS7 and HEK293 cells transfected with ERalpha ; however, this response was not linked to membrane ERalpha but to direct physical interactions of cytosolic ERalpha with the membrane-bound IGF-1 receptor. Moreover, activation of MAPK by E2 was inhibited in these cells after cotreatment with H1356, a polypeptide that binds the IGF-1 receptor and blocks IGF-1 action. Therefore, the possible role of cytosolic ERalpha /IGF-1 receptor interactions with activation of MAPK was investigated in MCF-7 cells transfected with pSRE or GAL4-CAT/GAL-ElkC (Fig. 7, C and D, respectively). 10 nM E2 and IGF-1 induce reporter gene activity in cells transfected with these constructs, and as a positive control H1356 polypeptide inhibited the IGF-1-induced response. In contrast, H1356 did not affect E2-induced activity in MCF-7 cells transfected with pSRE or GAL4-CAT/GAL-ElkC, indicating that cytosolic ERalpha interactions with the IGF-1 receptor in MCF-7 cells were not responsible for activation of MAPK as previously reported in COS7 and HEK293 cells (51).



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   E2 and growth factor activation of pSRE and GAL4-CAT/GAL-ElkC. A and B, ZR-75 and T47D cells. ER-positive ZR-75 (A) or T47D (B) cells were transfected with pSRE or GAL4-CAT/GAL-ElkC and treated with 10 nM TGF-alpha , IGF-1, or E2, and reporter gene activity was determined as described under "Experimental Procedures." Significant (*, p < 0.05) induction was observed for E2 and growth factors. C and D, effects of H1356 on E2 and IGF-1-induced activity. MCF-7 cells were transfected with pSRE (C) or GAL4-CAT/GAL-ElkC (D) and treated with 10 nM E2 or IGF-1 alone or in combination with 0.1-10 µM H1356 polypeptide, and CAT activity was determined as described under "Experimental Procedures." Significant (*, p < 0.05) induction of CAT activity was observed for E2 and IGF-1, and H1356 significantly (*, p < 0.05) inhibited only the IGF-1-induced response. Results were determined in triplicate (three separate determinations) and expressed as means ± S.D.

Fluorescence immunocytochemistry was used to detect membrane hER and HE11 ectopically expressed in ER-negative CHO-K1 cells (Fig. 8). For detection of membrane hER and HE11, cells were fixed with paraformaldehyde to minimize membrane permeability, and following staining with the H222 antibody increased membrane staining was observed in cells transfected with hER (Fig. 8B) or HE11 (Fig. 8C), whereas a signal was not observed in nontransfected cells (Fig. 8A). In cells using IgG alone or after transfection with hER or HE11, membrane signals were not detected (Figs. 8, D-F, respectively). Nuclear staining was observed in cells fixed in the presence of detergent and transfected with hER or HE11 (Fig. 8, H and I), whereas no signal was observed in nontransfected cells (Fig. 8G).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Immunofluorescence detection of plasma membrane (A-C) and nuclear (G-I) hER or HE11 ectopically expressed in CHO-K1 cells. A-C, cells were stained with H222 antibody following fixation without detergent to minimize permeabilization of the plasma membrane. Nontransfected cells (A) exhibit no nuclear or plasma membrane staining. After ectopic expression of hER or HE11, ~25% of the cells exhibit a detectable increase in membrane hER (B) or HE11 (C) signal. Occasional nuclear staining in less than 1% of the cells was attributed to transfected cells with plasma membranes that were compromised during staining (B). Cells subjected to the same treatments with H222 antibody replaced by rat IgG show no plasma membrane or nuclear signal in nontransfected (D), hER-transfected (E), or HE11-transfected cells (F). Fixation in the presence of detergent (G-I) reveals nuclear signal in ~25% of the cells after transfection with hER (H) or HE11 (I) in contrast to nontransfected cells (G).



    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Interactions between estrogens, growth factors, and other mitogens in breast cancer cells are complex and play an important role in activating signaling pathways required for cell cycle progression and proliferation (52-56). Growth factor activation of ligand-independent ERalpha action has been extensively investigated (reviewed in Refs. 57-59) and is primarily associated with phosphorylation of specific amino acids required for a functional response using constructs containing an ERE-dependent promoter. For example, growth factor activation of the MAPK pathway results in kinase-dependent phosphorylation of Ser118 in the AF1 domain of ERalpha and is required for ligand-independent ERalpha action (60). It has also been reported that pp90rsk1-dependent phosphorylation of ERalpha (at Ser118 and Ser167) enhances AF1-dependent transcriptional activity of ERalpha (61). Protein kinase A also increases phosphorylation and ligand-independent ERalpha action (62-65), and this was associated with phosphorylation of serine 236 (65).

In addition to growth factor activation of ERalpha , estrogens also activate diverse growth factor/mitogen-like signaling, including the Src/Ras/MAPK and cAMP pathways (42-48), and these responses may be associated with activation of membrane ER. Transient transfection of ERalpha (or ERbeta ) in ER-negative CHO cells results in incorporation of ER in cell membranes, and E2 activates the MAPK pathway in the transfected cells (45). A recent study also reported that estrogens rapidly activated the MAPK pathway in human neuroblastoma cells and induced reporter gene activity in cells transiently transfected with a construct containing a mouse c-fos gene promoter insert (46).

c-fos protooncogene is induced by E2 and growth factors in human breast cancer cells, and estrogen action is associated with ERalpha /Sp1 interactions with a GC-rich site in the distal region of the promoter (39). Since the c-fos gene promoter also contains downstream elements responsive to growth factors, we have used various fos promoter-derived constructs to study growth factor-ERalpha cross-talk. Results showed that not only growth factors but E2 also induced reporter gene activity in MCF-7 cells transfected with constructs containing -1400 to +41 (pFC2), -354 to -296 (pSS), or -325 to -296 (pSRE) fos gene promoter inserts, and the former two constructs contained only SIE/SRE that are activated via kinase-dependent pathways. These results are consistent with previous studies showing that in MCF-7 cells E2 induces kinase cascades that activate MAPK (42-45). E2, IGF-1, and TGF-alpha alone significantly activated reporter gene activity in MCF-7 cells transfected with pFC2 (Fig. 1A) and GAL-ElkC/GAL4-CAT (Fig. 5B) constructs, and the induction response was markedly enhanced after cotransfection with ERalpha expression plasmid. Similar results have also been observed for kinase-dependent activation of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase (constructs) by E2 in pulmonary arterial endothelial cells (66). The role of ERalpha expression in mediating increased reporter gene activity was further investigated and shown to be related to enhanced ERK1/2 activation (60-100%) as determined by immunoblots of whole cell extracts of MCF-7 cells (Fig. 6B). Increased reporter gene activity associated with ERalpha cotransfection was higher in transient transfection studies (>3-fold) than the enhanced ERK1/2 phosphorylation; however, since only a fraction of the cells are transfected, the overall enhanced kinase activation in these cells will be higher than observed in whole cell extracts (Fig. 6B).

Razandi et al. (45) showed that in ER-negative CHO cells, transfection with ERalpha resulted in activation of signaling pathways associated with activation of kinase pathways and nuclear ERalpha . To confirm that transient transfection of ERalpha can lead to enhanced kinase activation, we used ER-negative MDA-MB-231 and CHO cells transfected with wild-type and variant ER expression plasmids and determined activation of pSS or pSRE. The results obtained in MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 2B) showed that in cells transfected with pSS and ERalpha or HE11 (DNA binding domain deletion), E2 induced CAT activity; similar results were observed for CHO cells using pSRE (Fig. 3E), suggesting that this kinase-dependent response is not associated with nuclear ERalpha action. The fact that a DNA binding domain-deficient mutant (HE11) also activates pSS or pSRE supports the ER-mediated kinase activation pathway in MDA-MB-231, CHO, and MCF-7 cells and is consistent with results of previous studies in ER-negative CHO cells transfected with ERalpha (45). Moreover, E2 and growth factors also activate pSRE and GAL4-CAT/GAL-ElkC in ER-positive ZR75 and T47D breast cancer cells (Fig. 7, A and B). Deletion analysis of the fos gene promoter showed that the SRE (-325 to -296) was the minimal promoter activated by both TGF-alpha and E2, and previous studies have also demonstrated that other mitogens and growth factors induce c-fos through kinase activation of the MAPK pathway and phosphorylaton of proteins binding the SRE (32). Results obtained using the MAPK kinase inhibitor PD98059, dominant negative ras, and MAPK expression plasmids confirm that both E2 and TGF-alpha also activate the c-fos SRE in breast cancer cells through MAPK pathways, and this was also associated with increased formation of the ternary complex of SRF and Elk-1 that binds to this element in gel mobility shift assays (Fig. 4).

Activation of fos promoter constructs through the SRE is dependent on the mitogenic stimuli and cell context. For example, induction of reporter gene activity in HeLa cervical carcinoma cells by serum and epidermal growth factor required an intact SRF, whereas mutation of the TCF site did not affect induction by serum, and induction by epidermal growth factor was decreased by 50% (14). In contrast, growth hormone activation of the SRE in 3T3-F442A and Chinese hamster ovary cells stably transfected with the growth hormone receptor required intact SRF and TCF sites (19, 20). E2 (and growth factor) activation of pSS/pSRE in breast cancer cells also requires both SRF and TCF sites, and results obtained with the MAPK kinase inhibitor PD98059 and dominant negative MAPK, Ras, and Elk-1 expression plasmids are consistent with previous reports showing E2-dependent activation of Ras-MAPK signaling in breast cancer cells. Results obtained using CHO cells confirm that ERalpha -dependent activation of MAPK (45) is paralleled by activation of Elk-1 and pSRE (Figs. 3E, 5D, and 7) as observed in multiple breast cancer cell lines.

In summary, our results show that hormone-induced activation (phosphorylation) of the Elk-1 transcription factor is an important downstream target of E2-dependent Ras-MAPK signaling in breast cancer cells. Although growth factors also induced Ras-MAPK activation and phosphorylation of Elk-1 in MCF-7 cells, ICI 182,780 did not inhibit this response, suggesting that there are differences between growth factor- and E2-mediated activation of the c-fos pSRE. Results of this study show that E2 activates kinase-dependent phosphorylation of Elk-1, and this may be due, in part, to a membrane receptor (Fig. 8). However, a recent study showed that activation of MAPK signaling and IGF-1 receptor phosphorylation by E2 was associated with direct interaction of ERalpha with the IGF-1 receptor in COS7 and HEK293 cells (51). In contrast, our results in MCF-7 cells demonstrate that interaction of cytosolic ERalpha with the IGF-1 receptor does not play a role in activation of MAPK in MCF-7 cells (Fig. 7). Moreover, we have also shown by fluorescence immunocytochemistry (Fig. 8) that ectopic expression of hER or HE11 in CHO cells leads to accumulation of membrane (Fig. 8, B and C) and nuclear (Fig. 8, H and I) ERalpha or HE11, and this supports a pathway involving membrane ERalpha (Fig. 9). Current studies are focused on further characterization of the mechanisms of hormone- and growth factor-induced expression of c-fos and other SRE-dependent genes/gene promoters in breast cancer cell lines.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Model for estrogen and growth factor activation of Elk-1 and an SRE in MCF-7 cells.



    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants ES09253 and ES09106 and the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger A Sid Kyle Professor of Toxicology. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843-4466. Tel.: 979-845-5988; Fax: 979-862-4929; E-mail: ssafe@cvm.tamu.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 5, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M005492200


    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: SIE, Sis-inducible enhancer; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; E2, 17beta -estradiol; ER, estrogen receptor; SRE, serum response element; SRF, serum response factor; STAT, signal transducers and activators of transcription; TCF, ternary complex factor; TGF-alpha , transforming growth factor alpha ; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; hER, human ER; IGF, insulin-like growth factor; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; dn, dominant negative; CAT, chloramphenicol aminotransferase; DPBS, Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES


1. Curran, T. (1988) in The Oncogene Handbook (Reddy, E. P. , Skalka, A. M. , and Curran, T., eds) , pp. 307-325, Elsevier, Amsterdam
2. Muller, R. (1986) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 823, 207-225[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Cohen, D. R., and Curran, T. (1989) Crit. Rev. Oncog. 1, 65-88[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Curran, T., and Franza, B. R., Jr. (1988) Cell 55, 395-397[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Rivera, V. M., Sheng, M., and Greenberg, M. E. (1990) Genes Dev. 4, 255-268[Abstract]
6. Fisch, T. M., Prywes, R., and Roeder, R. G. (1987) Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 3490-3502[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Shaw, P. E., Schroter, H., and Nordheim, A. (1989) Cell 56, 563-572[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Treisman, R. (1986) Cell 46, 567-574[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Candeliere, G. A., Prud'homme, J., and St-Arnaud, R. (1991) Mol. Endocrinol. 5, 1780-1788[Abstract]
10. Lee, K., Deeds, J. D., Chiba, S., Un-No, M., Bond, A. T., and Segre, G. V. (1994) Endocrinology 134, 441-450[Abstract]
11. McDonnell, S. E., Kerr, L. D., and Matrisian, L. M. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 4284-4293[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Hill, C. S., and Treisman, R. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 5037-5047[Abstract]
13. Ginty, D. D., Bonni, A., and Greenberg, M. E. (1994) Cell 77, 713-725[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Wang, Y., Falasca, M., Schlessinger, J., Malstrom, S., Tsichlis, P., Settleman, J., Hu, W., Lim, B., and Prywes, R. (1998) Cell Growth Differ. 9, 513-522[Abstract]
15. Cavigelli, M., Dolfi, F., Claret, F. X., and Karin, M. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 5957-5964[Abstract]
16. Price, M. A., Cruzalegui, F. H., and Treisman, R. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 6552-6563[Abstract]
17. Soh, J. W., Lee, E. H., Prywes, R., and Weinstein, I. B. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 1313-1324[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Meyer, D. J., Stephenson, E. W., Johnson, L., Cochran, B. H., and Schwartz, J. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 6721-6725[Abstract]
19. Liao, J., Hodge, C., Meyer, D., Ho, P. S., Rosenspire, K., and Schwartz, J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 25951-25958[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Hodge, C., Liao, J., Stofega, M., Guan, K., Carter-Su, C., and Schwartz, J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 31327-31336[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. De Cesare, D., Jacquot, S., Hanauer, A., and Sassone-Corsi, P. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 12202-12207[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Wilding, G., Lippman, M. E., and Gelmann, E. P. (1988) Cancer Res. 48, 802-805[Abstract]
23. Weisz, A., and Bresciani, F. (1993) Crit. Rev. Oncog. 4, 361-388[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Van der Burg, B., De Groot, R. P., Isbrücker, L., Kruijer, W., and De Laat, S. W. (1990) Mol. Endocrinol. 4, 1720-1726[Abstract]
25. Van der Burg, B., Van Selm-Miltenburg, A. J. P., De Laat, S. W., and Van Zoelen, E. J. J. (1989) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 64, 223-228[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Bonapace, I. M., Addeo, R., Altucci, L., Cicatiello, L., Bifulco, M., Laezza, C., Salzano, S., Sica, V., Bresciani, F., and Weisz, A. (1996) Oncogene 12, 753-763[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Van der Burg, B., De Groot, R. P., Isbrücker, L., Kruijer, W., and De Laat, S. W. (1991) J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 40, 215-221[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Doucas, V., Spyrou, G., and Yaniv, M. (1991) EMBO J. 10, 2237-2245[Abstract]
29. Johnson, R. S., Spegelman, B. M., and Papaionnou, V. (1992) Cell 71, 577-586[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Karin, M. (1994) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 6, 415-424[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Karin, M., and Hunter, T. (1995) Curr. Biol. 5, 747-757[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Treisman, R. (1994) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 4, 96-101[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Treisman, R. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 4905-4913[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Treisman, R. (1990) Semin. Cancer Biol. 1, 47-58[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Sheng, M., Thompson, M. A., and Greenberg, M. E. (1991) Science 252, 1427-1430[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Darnell, J. E., Kerr, I. M., and Stark, G. R. (1994) Science 264, 1415-1421[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Darnell, J. E., Jr. (1996) Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 51, 391-403[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Candeliere, G. A., Jurutka, P. W., Haussler, M. R., and St-Arnaud, R. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 584-592[Abstract]
39. Duan, R., Porter, W., and Safe, S. (1998) Endocrinology 139, 1981-1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Pietrzkowski, Z., Wernicke, D., Porcu, P., Jameson, B. A., and Baserga, R. (1992) Cancer Res. 52, 6447-6451[Abstract]
41. Webster, N., Jin, J. R., Green, S., Hollis, M., and Chambon, P. (2000) Cell 52, 169-178
42. Migliaccio, A., Di Domenico, M., Castoria, G., de Falco, A., Bontempo, P., Nola, E., and Auricchio, F. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 1292-1300[Abstract]
43. Migliaccio, A., Piccolo, D., Castoria, G., Di Domenico, M., Bilancio, A., Lombardi, M., Gong, W., Beato, M., and Auricchio, F. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 2008-2018[Free Full Text]
44. Improta-Brears, T., Whorton, A. R., Codazzi, F., York, J. D., Meyer, T., and McDonnell, D. P. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 4686-4691[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Razandi, M., Pedram, A., Greene, G. L., and Levin, E. R. (1999) Mol. Endocrinol. 13, 307-319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Watters, J. J., Campbell, J. S., Cunningham, M. J., Krebs, E. G., and Dorsa, D. M. (1997) Endocrinology 138, 4030-4033[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Marino, M., Pallottini, V., and Trentalance, A. (1998) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 245, 254-258[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Aronica, S. M., Kraus, W. L., and Katzenellenbogen, B. S. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 8517-8521[Abstract]
49. Marais, R., Wynne, J., and Treisman, R. (1993) Cell 73, 381-393[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Gille, H., Strahl, T., and Shaw, P. E. (1995) Curr. Biol. 5, 1191-1200[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Kahlert, S., Nuedling, S., Van Eickels, M., Vetter, H., Meyer, R., and Grohe, C. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 18447-18453[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52. Dickson, R. B., and Lippman, M. E. (1988) in Breast Cancer: Cellular and Molecular Biology (Lippman, M. E. , and Dickson, R. B., eds) , pp. 119-166, Kluwer Press, Boston
53. Dickson, R. B., and Lippman, M. E. (1991) in The Breast (Bland, K. I. , and Copeland, E. M., eds) , pp. 363-394, W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia
54. Dickson, R. B., and Lippman, M. E. (1995) Endocr. Rev. 16, 559-589[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
55. Ethier, S. P. (1995) J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 87, 964-973[Abstract]
56. Lippman, M. E., and Dickson, R. B. (1989) Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 45, 383-440[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
57. Weigel, N. L., and Zhang, Y. (1998) J. Mol. Med. 76, 469-479[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
58. Smith, C. L. (1998) Biol. Reprod. 58, 627-632[Abstract]
59. Kato, S., Kitamoto, T., Masuhiro, Y., and Yanagisawa, J. (1998) Oncology 55 Suppl. 1, 5-10[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
60. Kato, S., Endoh, H., Masuhiro, Y., Kitamoto, T., Uchiyama, S., Sasaki, H., Masushige, S., Gotoh, Y., Nishida, E., and Kawashima, H. (1995) Science 270, 1491-1494[Abstract]
61. Joel, P. B., Smith, J., Sturgill, T. W., Fisher, T. L., Blenis, J., and Lannigan, D. A. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 1978-1984[Abstract/Free Full Text]
62. Aronica, S. M., and Katzenellenbogen, B. S. (1993) Mol. Endocrinol. 7, 743-752[Abstract]
63. Ince, B. A., Montano, M. M., and Katzenellenbogen, B. S. (1994) Mol. Endocrinol. 8, 1397-1406[Abstract]
64. Cho, H. S., and Katzenellenbogen, B. S. (1993) Mol. Endocrinol. 7, 441-452[Abstract]
65. Chen, D., Pace, P. E., Coombes, R. C., and Ali, S. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 1002-1015[Abstract/Free Full Text]
66. Shaul, P. W. (1999) Steroids 64, 28-34[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.