Functionally Different AU- and G-rich cis-Elements Confer Developmentally Regulated mRNA Stability in Trypanosoma cruzi by Interaction with Specific RNA-binding Proteins*

Iván D'OrsoDagger and Alberto C. C. Frasch§

From the Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas, Instituto Tecnológico de Chascomús, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Universidad Nacional de General San Martín, 1650 San Martin, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina

Received for publication, December 5, 2000, and in revised form, February 5, 2001


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms have been suggested to be the main point of control of gene expression in kinetoplastid parasites. We have previously shown that Trypanosoma cruzi SMUG mucin mRNA steady-state level is developmentally regulated by post-transcriptional mechanisms, being stable in the epimastigote insect vector stage, but unstable in the trypomastigote infective stage of the parasite. Its turnover is controlled by an AU-rich element (ARE) localized in the 3'-untranslated region, since a reporter gene lacking this sequence was stable in the trypomastigote stage (Di Noia, J. M., D'Orso, I., Sanchez, D. O., and Frasch, A. C. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 10218-10227). Here, we show by gel mobility shift assay that the 44-nt ARE sequence interacts with a set of stage-specific AU-rich element RNA-binding proteins (ARE-BPs). The epimastigote stage AU-rich element RNA-binding protein, named E-ARE-BP, and the trypomastigote stage ARE-BPs, named T-ARE-BPs, are efficiently competed by poly(U). UV cross-linking analysis showed that E-ARE-BP has an apparent molecular mass of 100 kDa and is different from the 45-50-kDa ARE-BPs present in other stages of the parasite. Transfection experiments allowed the identification of a novel cis-element that might be responsible for a positive effect on mRNA stability. It is a G-rich element, named GRE, composed by two contiguous CGGGG pentamers. The factors that recognize GRE were different from the ones that bind to ARE, in both molecular masses and subcellular localization. Thus, ARE and GRE are functionally different cis-elements, which might regulate mucin expression throughout the parasite life cycle.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Kinetoplastid parasites control gene expression at the level of mRNA maturation by post-transcriptional mechanisms (reviewed in Refs. 2 and 3). alpha -Amanitin-sensitive RNA polymerase II from trypanosomes transcribes large polycistronic units containing a number of coding sequences (4). Transcriptional start sites have been extremely difficult to detect; only two putative promoter regions were described as transcriptionally void regions upstream from the actin and Hsp70 genes (5, 6). The maturation of polycistronic RNA precursors to render individual mRNA molecules is achieved by cleavage in the intergenic region by a coupled processing of 5' end trans-splicing and 3' end polyadenylation (7). Both processes seem to depend on the recognition of polypyrimidine tracts present in the intergenic regions (8), which acts as a bifunctional element affecting RNA processing both upstream and downstream from itself (7).

In vivo treatment of parasites with protein synthesis inhibitors induces an accumulation (9) or a decrease in the mRNA levels of some transcripts (1), and this effect is not due to an increase or a reduction in transcriptional levels, respectively. Therefore, these results point to the presence of labile factors, affected by protein synthesis inhibitors, that might be negative or positive regulators of mRNA maturation. However, the mechanisms of interference in pre-mRNA processing, unbalanced nucleo-cytoplasmic transport, or unusual mRNA stability control processes remain to be identified. It is known that both 5'- and 3'-untranslated regions (UTRs)1 are responsible for stabilization/destabilization mechanisms, up- or down-regulating mRNA levels in a developmentally regulated manner (10, 11). In transient and stable parasite transfection experiments, the 3'-UTRs of some mRNAs were found to influence the expression of a reporter gene in a stage-specific manner (1, 10, 11). The way in which the 3'-UTR differentially influence the mRNA steady-state levels is still unknown. Furthermore, few cis-elements responsible for these post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms have been defined (12-14).

Several cis-elements and trans-acting factors controlling mRNA stability have been characterized in higher eukaryotes (15, 16). A well known example is the case of AU-rich elements or AREs, cis-sequences localized in the 3'-UTR of short-lived mRNAs, such as proto-oncogenes and cytokines (17). These elements are recognized by different positive or negative RNA-binding proteins, like HuR and AUF-1/heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein D, respectively (18-20), causing rapid changes in mRNA stability. Another example is the ribonucleoprotein complex associated with human alpha -globin mRNA (21). A cytidine-rich (C-rich) segment within the 3'-UTR of alpha -globin is critical for mRNA stability through the interaction with different trans-acting factors that mediate this effect (22). However, it has been shown that neither alpha CP1 nor alpha CP2 complex-forming proteins can bind the C-rich element unless they are complexed with the remaining non-poly(C)-binding proteins, such us AUF1/heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein D (23). Thus, a protein implicated in ARE-mediated mRNA decay is also an integral component of the mRNA stabilizing alpha -complex.

Trypanosoma cruzi, the protozoan parasite agent of Chagas disease, is covered by a dense mucin coat (24), at least in two of its developmental stages. Mucins are highly O-glycosylated proteins having relevant roles in cell protection and in cell-cell interactions, especially in immune cell migration in vertebrate cells (25). Mucins from T. cruzi were classified into two different protein families that differ between parasite stages. The form of the parasite present in the insect vector, epimastigote, expresses a small mucin family named TcSMUG (35-50 kDa) whose core proteins are encoded in about 70 different genes (1), while the forms of the parasite present in the mammalian host, bloodstream trypomastigotes, have larger mucins encoded by 500 different genes (26). Developmentally regulated expression of these mucins in the different parasite stages is relevant because they might accomplish different functions related with parasite survival (27).

We have previously demonstrated that a 44-nt ARE sequence within the 3'-UTR of SMUG mucin family was a destabilizing cis-element acting in a stage specific manner (1). These results suggest that different trans-acting factors might bind mucin transcripts in vivo, and selectively regulate its mRNA stability throughout parasite development. We have now identified a novel G-rich element, named GRE, which might be responsible for a stage-specific stabilization of SMUG mRNA family in the epimastigote form of the parasite. Transfection experiments show that GRE and ARE sequences have opposite functions in terms of mRNA stabilization in the different stages of the parasite and are specifically recognized by trans-acting factors, some of them being developmentally regulated during the trypanosome life cycle.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Parasite Cultures and Drug Treatments-- Trypanosoma cruzi CL-Brener cloned stock (28) was used. Different forms of the parasites were obtained as described previously (29). Purity of the different parasite forms was determined by conventional microscopy and was at least 95%. Epimastigote cultures were taken in logarithmic growth phase at a cell density of 3 × 107/ml and treated with actinomycin D (ActD) (Sigma), at a final concentration of 10 µg/ml, which is known to inhibit transcription in trypanosomatids (12, 30). Aliquots were taken at different times after addition of the inhibitor. Cycloheximide (Sigma) was used at a final concentration of 50 µg/ml (31). Parasite viability was confirmed by microscopy at every time point of the experiments. Culture aliquots were harvested by centrifugation, washed with phosphate-buffered saline, and frozen at -70 °C until RNA extraction.

Chloramphenicol Acetyltransferase (CAT) Assay-- An equal number of parasites from each transfected population was harvested, washed once with 0.25 M Tris-HCl (pH 8), and cellular extracts were prepared by four freeze-thaw cycles and heat inactivation. Cell lysates were assayed for CAT activity as described previously (32). Reactions were conducted for 1 h at 37 °C with cellular extracts prepared from 107 parasites. This time was previously adjusted to fit within the linear range of the assay. Conversion of [14C]chloramphenicol to acetylated forms was analyzed by thin layer chromatography and quantified by densitometry.

DNA Constructions and Parasite Transfections-- The chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (cat) gene, the complete TcSMUG intergenic region, and the SMUG-L and SMUG-LDelta AU constructs were amplified by PCR as described previously (1). All 3'-UTR deletions were created by PCR and fused downstream from cat into the HindIII and XhoI sites. The PCR primers contained restriction enzymes sites to facilitate the subsequent cloning steps as indicated. All the primers used to generate internal deletion mutants of the 3'-UTR are listed below. For clone SMUG-LDelta GRE: 1-SE, 5'-cccaagcttTCGGTCTGGAGTCCCGTTGTG-3'; and 3'-AS, 5'-cggaattcGCACGCACAACCAAAGACACC-3'. For clone SMUG-LDelta 1: 1+-SE, 5'-cccaagcttTGCGCCGCGTATATTTGAGC-3'. Two oligonucleotides containing the first 27 base pairs with a HindIII restriction site: sense, 5'-agcttTGAGGACGGGGCGGGGCGCGTGCGCCGA-3'; and antisense, 5'-agcttCGGCGCACGCGCCCCGCCCCGTCCTCAA-3', were annealed and cloned rendering the complete clone pTEX-SMUG-LDelta 1. For clone SMUG-LDelta 2: 2-SE, 5'-cggaattcTGCCCGTGCATTCTCTGCGAC-3'; and 2-AS, 5'-cggaattcAAATATACGCGGCGCAGGCGCC-3'. For clone SMUG-LDelta 3: 3-SE, 5'-cggaattcGTGGGGGGAAGCGTCGGTGCG-3'; and 3-AS. For clone SMUG-LDelta Sire: Sire-SE, 5'-cggaattcAGGCGAATATTTTTTTTCATCGG-3'; and Sire-AS, 5'-cggaattcCCCCCGCGAACATCCCTTTCAC-3'.

Each DNA fragment was cloned in the pTEX vector (33), kindly provided by Dr. J. M. Kelly (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom). Transfections were carried out as described previously (1). The neo resistance gene was used for selection and as an internal control of transfection levels since it is transcribed polycistronically from the same promoter (33). The polyadenylation site of the cat mRNA was determined by reverse transcription-PCR using the oligonucleotide anchor d(T) (5'- GCGAGCTCCGCGGCCGCG(T)18-3') using the Superscript II enzyme (Life Technologies, Inc.). PCR was performed on first strand product using CAT/se (5'-gggATGGAGAAAAAAATCACTGGATATA-3') and an oligonucleotide with the anchor sequence of anchor d(T). The products were cloned in pGEMT-Easy (Promega, Madison, WI) and sequenced.

In Vitro Transcription-- All plasmids for in vitro transcription were constructed as follows. Complementary oligonucleotides, corresponding to the sense and antisense strands of the RNAs transcribed, were annealed and cloned into the EcoRI and HindIII sites of the vector pBS- (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Transcription of sense sequences was performed with 1 µg of HindIII-digested plasmids using T7 RNA-polymerase (Promega) in the presence of [alpha -32P]UTP (800 Ci/mmol, PerkinElmer Life Sciences), 500 µM ATP, CTP, and GTP. Antisense transcripts were synthesized with T3 RNA polymerase. All transcripts were purified on a 8 M urea, 12% polyacrylamide gel and eluted overnight in RNA elution buffer (0.3 M NaOAc, 10 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM EDTA). After elution, RNAs were ethanol-precipitated and resuspended in 50 µl of water. Preparative in vitro transcription was done as described previously (34) and detected by UV shadowing.

Protein Extract Preparation and Subcellular Fractionation-- For total protein extract preparation, parasites were resuspended in lysis buffer (0.75% CHAPS detergent, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 5 mM beta -mercapthoethanol, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), and 10% glycerol) supplemented with protease inhibitors: 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 50 µM E-64 (Sigma). After 30 min on ice, the extract was centrifuged at 19,000 rpm (SS-34 rotor) and the supernatant stored at -70 °C. For subcellular fractionation, nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions were prepared as described previously for another kinetoplastid parasite, Crithidia fasciculata (35). Briefly, parasites were washed twice in Buffer A (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl) and resuspended in Buffer B (Buffer A plus 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.5% Nonidet P-40) in the presence of protease inhibitors. After 20 min on ice and vortexing each 3 min, the preparation was centrifuged for 15 min at 5000 rpm. The supernatant containing the cytosolic fraction was mixed with an equal volume of Buffer D (10 mM Tris-HCl (ph 7.6), 10 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 10% glycerol). The pellet was resuspended in an equal volume of Buffer C (Buffer D plus 20% glycerol) and passed through a 21-gauge needle and frozen several times on liquid N2 to lyse nuclei. After centrifugation to remove debris, the supernatant was mixed with an equal volume of Buffer D (nuclear fraction). Polysomes were prepared as previously described (36). Polysome extract was pre-treated at 25 °C for 15 min with ribonuclease A (37) when indicated, and the RNase was inactivated with the ribonuclease inhibitor RNasin (Promega), prior incubation of the extract with the labeled RNA. The amount of RNase A used was determined by titration.

Analysis of RNA-Protein Interactions-- Binding reactions were performed with 10 µl (3 µg/µl) of trypanosome total extract (prepared as above), 10,000 cpm of RNA probe, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 5% glycerol, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 µg/ml bovine serum albumin, 500 ng/µl tRNA (Sigma) in a 20 µl final volume. The incubation time was 10 min at 25 °C. Heparin was added at a concentration of 1 µg/ml. Each reaction was loaded directly onto a 7% acrylamide-bisacrylamide (38:2), 0.5× TBE nondenaturing gel to perform an electrophoresis mobility shift assay (EMSA). The gels were dried and exposed to film at -70 °C. For competition experiments, the extract was incubated simultaneously with the indicated amounts of unlabeled and labeled RNAs. All homoribopolymers (poly(A), poly(C), poly(G), and poly(U)) were from Sigma.

UV Cross-linking Analysis-- 32P-Labeled RNA was incubated with a trypanosome total extract as described above. The in vitro binding reaction was run on a 7% acrylamide-bisacrylamide (38:2), 0.5× TBE native gel. The RNA-protein complexes detected by exposing to films at 4 °C, cross-linked by UV light irradiation (254 nm, 500 mJ/cm2), treated with RNase T1, were cut from the gel and eluted with 0.1% SDS at 37 °C with vigorous shaking. The cross-linked products were resolved by electrophoresis on 10% SDS-PAGE, and the apparent molecular masses of the proteins were determined with molecular size protein standards.

Northern Blot-- RNA was purified using TRIzol reagent following the manufacturer's instructions (Life Technologies, Inc.). Northern blots were carried out as described previously (38). Zeta-Probe nylon membranes (Bio-Rad) were used for all blottings. Probes were radioactively labeled with [alpha -32P]dCTP (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) by PCR as in Ref. 39. Densitometry was done using 1D Image Analysis Software (Kodak Digital Science).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Both Positive and Negative cis-Elements within the 3'-UTR of SMUG Mucin Family Regulate mRNA Stability and Translation Efficiency-- TcSMUG mucin family was previously shown to be post-transcriptionally regulated and an ARE within its 3'-UTR was found to be responsible for a destabilizing mechanism acting in a stage-specific manner (1). However, this mucin family is very stable in the epimastigote stage, and the ARE motif was not responsible for this selective mRNA stabilization (see below). We now searched for other cis-elements required for mRNA stability and/or translational control in this parasite stage. Five 3'-UTR deletion mutants of the SMUG-L clone were constructed (Fig. 1A). Each mutant is deleted in one of the blocks in which the mucin 3'-UTR is organized (1). The complete construction consists of the cat gene flanked by both 5' and 3' intergenic regions of SMUG-L group, which contains sequences that ensure correct trans-splicing and polyadenylation, cloned in the pTEX vector (33).


View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Half-life determinations of cat mRNA fused to complete mucin SMUG-L 3'-UTR and deletion mutants. A, schematic representations of complete SMUG-L and 3'-UTR deletion mutants are shown. All constructs were done by PCR as described under "Experimental Procedures" using PCR primers with restriction endonuclease sites (B, BamHI; S, SmaI; H, HindIII; E, EcoRI; X, XhoI). The 5' and 3' intergenic regions (IR) contain the original trans-splicing site (ag) and polypyrimidine tract (pPy) for efficient mRNA processing. Epimastigote forms of the parasite were transfected with the indicated DNA constructs cloned in pTEX vector (33). B, epimastigotes transfected with the recombinant DNAs described in A were treated with 10 µg/ml ActD and total RNA was prepared at the indicated times (0, 60, 120, and 180 min). Equal amounts of RNA were analyzed by Northern blot. The same filter was sequentially hybridized with cat, neo, and rRNA probes. The hybridization performed with the neo probe serves as an internal control of the experiment since this gene is expressed from the same vector. C, quantitation of the bands from the Northern blots shown in B. The half-life of each transcript is indicated below the graphic. D, epimastigotes transfected with SMUG-L and SMUG-LDelta GRE constructions were treated with 10 µg/ml ActD and total RNA was prepared at the indicated times (0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 min). E, quantitation of the bands from the Northern blots shown in D. In panels C and E, the data were expressed as the mean relative amount of mRNA ± the standard error of the media (n = 3) at each time point after correction for the level of rRNA. Differences between SMUG-L and each deletion mutant were significant when comparing the means by Student's t test (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01).

Half-life determinations of transcripts from the complete construct (SMUG-L) and deletion mutants were carried out in the epimastigote form of the parasite (Fig. 1), taking advantage of the presence of an ActD-sensitive promoter in the pTEX vector. The transcript from the complete construct SMUG-L had a half-life of about 70 min. Conversely, SMUG-LDelta GRE transcript had a shorter half-life (t1/2 = 30 min), that is about 42% of that from SMUG-L clone. GRE sequence is a G-rich element that contains the first 27 nt of the 3'-UTR downstream the stop codon and is composed by two contiguous CGGGG pentamers (see below). Transcripts from two other constructs, SMUG-LDelta 2 and SMUG-LDelta 3, had similar half-lives to those of SMUG-L (t1/2 = 75 min and t1/2 = 65 min, respectively). Finally, SMUG-LDelta 1 and SMUG-LDelta Sire deletion mutants were transcribed into RNAs having increased half-lives (t1/2 = 140 min) (Fig. 1, B and C). Since the short interspersed repeat element (SIRE) retrotransposon (40) is a large element (450 base pairs), some partial deletion would be required to better define the region causing this effect. Since in the half-life determination of clone SMUG-LDelta GRE (Fig. 1B), less than 50% of the mRNA levels remained at the first sampling time (60 min), the experiment was repeated taking samples between 0 and 60 min. Thus, the half-life of SMUG-LDelta GRE was better calculated and shown to be 30 min, identical to that indicated in Fig. 1C (Fig. 1, D and E). These results suggest that the sequences in the 3'-UTR could be divided into several functional regions: 1) a positive G-rich element named GRE; 2) one negative element between nucleotides 28 and 62 downstream stop codon, named E1 for element 1; and 3) an AU-rich element between nucleotides 272 and 318 involved in selective mRNA destabilization in a stage-specific manner (see next section). The 3'-UTRs of SMUG-L and SMUG-LDelta GRE were modeled using the Genequest program (Lasergene Package, DNAstar Inc.) to predict if the deletion of GRE sequence would have an effect on the three-dimensional structure of the RNA. Both transcripts were found to share the same modeled structure, including all loops of the 3'-UTR (data not shown). Thus, it is likely that the sequence of the G-rich element is the one that confers the effect reflected on mRNA stability, and not any modification of the whole 3'-UTR of the RNA molecule.

In order to determine if the different domains of the 3'-UTR also influence expression at the translational level, the CAT activity from control and deletion mutants was measured and the values obtained were normalized to cat mRNA steady-state levels from each construct (Fig. 2). Enzymatic activity was expressed as the percentage of that obtained with the complete construct SMUG-L. The value obtained with the parasite population transfected with SMUG-LDelta GRE was similar (117% of SMUG-L) than the one obtained from parasites transfected with the complete contruct SMUG-L, suggesting that this G-rich element does not modulate translation efficiency. Conversely, SMUG-LDelta 1 deletion mutant, whose transcript has a larger half-life, also presented an increase in translation (185% of SMUG-L). This suggests that SMUG-LDelta 1 regulates both mRNA stability and translation efficiency in a negative manner. Moreover, SMUG-LDelta 2 and SMUG-LDelta 3 did not show a considerable effect on translational activity (88% and 112% of SMUG-L, respectively) (Fig. 2). Finally, the retrotransposon SIRE seems to produce a positive effect on translation, since its deletion causes a decrease in the ratio CAT activity/cat mRNA (15% of SMUG-L construct). This result is interesting, because it was suggested that SIRE exhibits another function in the process of mRNA maturation (see "Discussion"). Sites for 5' end trans-splicing and 3' end polyadenylation were the same in all the mRNAs derived from the constructs made, as indicated under "Experimental Procedures."


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Negative and positive cis-elements within the 3'-UTR of SMUG-L mucin mRNA modulate translation efficiency. A, mRNA steady-state levels of epimastigote stage of the parasite transfected with the DNA constructs shown in Fig. 1. The same filter was sequentially hybridized with cat and rRNA probes. B, thin layer chromatography of CAT activity assayed in the same parasite population used in the experiment shown in A. C, bar representation of the ratio of CAT activity (normalized to parasite number) versus cat mRNA level (normalized to rRNA signal) is shown. Results are expressed as the mean value ± the standard error media (n = 3). Differences between SMUG-L, SMUG-LDelta 1, and SMUG-LDelta Sire were significant (*, p < 0.05, when comparing the means by Student's t test).

A Novel GRE Confers mRNA Stability in a Stage-specific Manner and Is Functionally Different from the AU-rich Instability Element-- The effect of the GRE deletion (SMUG-LDelta GRE construct) on mRNA stability was analyzed in different parasite stages and the results compared with those obtained with the constructs SMUG-L (complete 3'-UTR) and SMUG-LDelta AU (lacking the 44-nt AU-rich instability element) (Fig. 3A). Epimastigote forms were differentiated into the infective form of the parasite, metacyclic trypomastigotes, and incubated with ActD to determine half-lives of the transcripts (Fig. 3). The probe used in the Northern blot analysis corresponds to the cat open reading frame. In the epimastigote stage, both SMUG-L and SMUG-LDelta AU transcripts bearing the GRE sequence within its 3'-UTR have similar half-lives (t1/2 = 70 and t1/2 = 68 min, respectively). On the other hand, transcripts from SMUG-LDelta GRE are less stable (t1/2 = 30 min) (Fig. 3C). It might be concluded that: 1) the GRE sequence in the epimastigote stage is involved in a selective mRNA stabilization process, and 2) the ARE sequence seems not to be involved in mRNA stabilization in this parasite form, since transcripts from both SMUG-L and SMUG-LDelta AU constructs have similar half-lives (Fig. 3, B and C) (see "Discussion").


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   A novel GRE localized in the 3'-UTR of SMUG-L confers mRNA stability in a stage-specific manner and is functionally different to the AU-rich element. A, schematic representation of SMUG-L (complete construct) and SMUG-LDelta GRE and SMUG-LDelta AU deletion mutants used to transfect epimastigote stage of the parasite. The sequence that was deleted in clone SMUG-LDelta GRE and SMUG-LDelta AU is indicated in the SMUG-L scheme. B, Northern blot of total RNA from epimastigotes transfected with the constructs shown in A. Epimastigotes were treated with 10 µg/ml ActD, and total RNA was prepared at the indicated times (0, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min). The same filter was sequentially hybridized with cat, neo, and rRNA probes. C, quantitation of cat mRNA levels from the Northern blot shown in B. The data were expressed as the mean relative amount of mRNA ± the standard error of the media (n = 3) at each time point after correction for the level of rRNA. Differences between SMUG-LDelta GRE and SMUG-L and between SMUG-LDelta GRE and SMUG-LDelta AU were significant (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 when comparing the means by Student's t test). D, epimastigote-derived metacyclic trypomastigotes were treated as indicated in B. E, quantitation of cat mRNA levels from the Northern blot shown in D. The data were expressed as the mean relative amount of mRNA ± the standard error of the media (n = 2) at each time point after correction for the level of rRNA. Differences between SMUG-LDelta AU and SMUG-L and between SMUG-LDelta AU and SMUG-LDelta GRE were significant (**, p < 0.01, when comparing the means by Student's t test). In panels C and E, the half-life of each transcript is indicated below the graphic.

Analysis of the infective metacyclic trypomastigotes stage, derived from differentiation of epimastigotes, also revealed differences in the mRNA steady-state levels. Both SMUG-L and SMUG-LDelta GRE RNAs were extremely short-lived (t1/2 < 10 min) as compared with those from SMUG-LDelta AU, which have a t1/2 > 30 min (Fig. 3E). Thus, the instability of SMUG-L and SMUG-LDelta GRE transcripts in the metacyclic trypomastigotes stage could be due to the presence of the ARE sequence within its 3'-UTR. Additionally, the same filter used to detect cat transcripts was hybridized with a neo probe. Since the neomycin gene is flanked by glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase intergenic regions (33) in the same plasmid bearing the cat reporter, it serves as an internal control of half-life determinations. As seen in Fig. 3 (B and D), neomycin half-lives are similar in each parasite stage independently of the construct tested.

The 27-nt GRE That Confers mRNA Stability Specifically Interacts with Different Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Complex-forming RNA-binding Proteins-- The identification of this novel cis-element involved in a mRNA stabilization process allowed the searching for trans-acting factors able to recognize G-rich sequences. The 27-nt GRE sequence was transcribed in vitro as described under "Experimental Procedures" and used to perform RNA-protein binding reactions and EMSA. The SMUG-L-GRE RNA oligonucleotide revealed the same three ribonucleoprotein complexes in all four parasite forms tested (Fig. 4A). As controls, no bands corresponding to the G-complexes 1, 2, and 3 were observed after incubation of SMUG-L-GRE RNA with RNase A or the protein extract with proteinase K (data not shown). To determine the apparent molecular masses of the proteins that compose the GRE-ribonucleoprotein complexes, a total protein extract from the epimastigote form of the parasite was incubated with an excess of 32P-labeled SMUG-L-GRE RNA oligonucleotide. The in vitro binding reactions were run in a native polyacrylamide gel and after UV cross-linking, the complexes were treated as under "Experimental Procedures" and further electrophoresed in a 10% SDS-PAGE (Fig. 4B). G-complex 1 gave rise to a single band having an apparent molecular mass of 80 kDa, while G-complexes 2 and 3 are composed by several proteins with apparent molecular masses of 35, 39, and 66 kDa. The RNA-binding proteins that compose G-complex-2 are present in different abundance in the epimastigote total lysate. One low abundant protein of about 66 kDa is detected together with two highly abundant factors of 35 and 55 kDa (Fig. 4B).


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   GRE cis-element is bound by specific RNA-binding proteins having different molecular masses. A, the 32P-labeled in vitro transcribed SMUG- L-GRE RNA was incubated with total protein extract from the four life cycle parasite stages: E, epimastigotes; Mt, metacyclic trypomastigotes; T, cell-derived trypomastigotes; and A, intracellular amastigotes. For the analysis of RNA-protein interactions, the in vitro binding reaction was electrophoresed on a 7% native polyacrylamide gel. RNA-protein complexes (G-rich complexes) are indicated by arrows 1, 2, and 3 on the left side of the panel. B, SMUG-L-GRE RNA was incubated with total protein extract from the epimastigote stage of the parasite and an EMSA was performed as in A. The localized RNA-protein complexes 1, 2, and 3 were cross-linked by UV light irradiation and electrophoresed on 10% SDS-PAGE. No radiolabeled proteins were seen when the lysate was pretreated with proteinase K or when RNase was added before UV irradiation (data not shown). Molecular size protein standards (kDa) are shown on the left side of the figure. C, native EMSA of an epimastigote total protein extract incubated with 32P-labeled SMUG-L-GRE RNA and competed with increasing amounts of unlabeled homoribopolymers (poly(A), -(C), -(G), and -(U)) or without competitor (-); RNA, probe alone.

Competition experiments were conducted to further characterize the sequence specificity of all complexes formed. Each of the four homoribopolymers was used to compete with the SMUG-L-GRE RNA oligonucleotide in an in vitro binding reaction. Poly(G) selectively blocks the assembly of two ribonucleoprotein complexes, G-complex 1 (smaller band) and G-complex 2 (Fig. 4C). This result is in agreement with the G-rich nature of the cis-element, used in the in vitro binding reaction. G-complex 1 is effectively competed out with a molar excess of 10-fold, whereas the formation of G-complex 2 partially disappeared at a molar excess of 1000-fold. This result could be due to differences in the concentration of protein-forming complexes in the epimastigote lysate and is also suggested by the UV cross-linking analysis (Fig. 4B), where G-complex 1 is barely detectable comparing with the amount of proteins forming G-complex 2. Conversely, complex 3 was not efficiently competed by any homoribopolymer and, thus, might be unspecific.

The minimal size of the SMUG-L-GRE RNA element recognized by the proteins forming G-complexes 1 and 2 was analyzed. The RNA sequence was divided into two separate sequences: (a) SMUG-L-GRE-1, with the sequence GGACGGGGCGGGGC; and (b) SMUG-L-GRE-2, which presents a CG-rich content, GCGCGUGCGCCG (Fig. 5A). The SMUG-L-GRE-1 RNA is sufficient to interact with both trans-acting factors (Fig. 5B). This result suggest that the minimal sequence for G-complex 1 and 2 formation is the first half of the element, which is composed of two contiguous CGGGG pentamers. G-complex 1 is localized in the cytoplasm, whereas G-complex 2 is equally distributed in both compartments, nucleus and cytoplasm (Fig. 5B).


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Identification of the minimal cis-element required for GRE binding and subcellular localization of GRE RNA-binding proteins. A, sequence of the RNA oligonucleotides used in B: GRE, complete G-rich element; GRE-1 and GRE-2, first- and second halves of GRE element, respectively. B, epimastigote forms of the parasite were lysed with Nonidet P-40 as described under "Experimental Procedures" (T) or separated into fractions containing nuclei (N) and cytosol (C). Materials obtained from equal number of parasites (10 × 106) were utilized for an in vitro binding reaction and electrophoresed in a native polyacrylamide gel with the indicated RNA probes. The position of the three G-rich complexes (1, 2 and 3) is indicated with arrows on the left side of the panel. A small arrow with an asterisk denotes the position of an artifact band, due to the RNA probe.

The 44-nt AU-rich Instability Element Interacts with Stage-specific, Developmentally Regulated, RNA-binding Proteins-- The 44-nt AU-rich cis-element was important in conferring mRNA instability in a stage-specific manner (1) (Fig. 3). Therefore, to know if the RNA-binding proteins that recognized in vitro this element, named here SMUG-L-AU, are developmentally regulated, protein extracts from the four different parasite stages were incubated with the RNA template in an in vitro binding reaction. The complexes formed were identified in a native polyacrylamide gel (Fig. 6A). A stage-specific pattern of RNA binding to this motif was observed. In the epimastigote stage, an RNA-binding protein named E-ARE-BP, for epimastigote AU-rich element binding protein, migrated much more slowly in the polyacrylamide native gel than the ribonucleoprotein complexes detected in the other three parasite stages. To determine the apparent molecular masses of these RNA-binding proteins, the total protein lysate of each parasite stage was incubated with an excess of SMUG-L-AU RNA probe and the ribonucleoprotein-complexes identified in the EMSA were UV-cross-linked and further electrophoresed in SDS-PAGE. The E-ARE-BP had an apparent molecular mass of ~100 kDa. In contrast, the ARE-BPs range between 45 and 50 kDa (Fig. 6B). Both results, 1) the ARE deletion affecting SMUG mucin mRNA stability (Fig. 3), and 2) the developmentally regulated expression pattern of the RNA-binding proteins that recognized the ARE motif (Fig. 6, A and B), point to a coordinated and stage-specific process during the life cycle parasite development.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   ARE RNA-binding proteins are developmentally regulated and have different molecular masses in the parasite life cycle stages. A, the 32P-labeled in vitro transcribed SMUG-L-AU RNA was incubated with total protein extract from the four life cycle parasite stages: E, epimastigotes; Mt, metacyclic trypomastigotes; T, cell-derived trypomastigotes; and A, intracellular amastigotes. For the analysis of RNA-protein interactions, the in vitro binding reaction was electrophoresed on a 7% native polyacrylamide gel. The arrows indicate the position of the different ribonucleoprotein complexes formed. E-ARE-BP denotes the position of an specific epimastigote AU-rich RNA-binding protein. ARE-BPs, AU-rich element RNA-binding proteins present in the other three parasite stages. B, SMUG-L-AU RNA was incubated with total protein extract from the four life cycle parasite stages and an EMSA was performed as in A. The localized RNA-protein complexes were cross-linked by UV light irradiation and further electrophoresed on 10% SDS-PAGE. No radiolabeled proteins were seen when the lysate was pretreated with proteinase K or when RNase was added before UV irradiation (data not shown). Molecular size protein standards (kDa) are shown on the left side of the figure.

Competition experiments were carried out to further confirm the specificity of the RNA-binding protein of the epimastigote form of the parasite that recognized the 44-nt SMUG-L-AU RNA template. Results with the four homoribopolymers showed that E-ARE-BP is selectively competed by poly(U) (Fig. 7A) but not by the other three homoribopolymers, as expected due to the U-rich nature of this element. Unlabeled sense and antisense RNAs were also tested in competition experiments (Fig. 7B). The addition of increasing amounts of unlabeled sense SMUG-L-AU RNA to the reaction mixture resulted in a concentration-dependent reduction in the formation of the ribonucleoprotein complex containing E-ARE-BP, whereas the addition of unlabeled antisense SMUG-L-AU RNA had little effect on the formation of this complex. Trypomastigote ARE-BPs (T-ARE-BPs) are also efficiently competed by poly(U) RNA, and not by any other homoribopolymer (Fig. 7C). Additionally, we tested the competition with unlabeled in vitro transcribed SMUG-L-AU sense and antisense RNAs. The SMUG-L-AU sense RNA, as was shown for the E-ARE-BP, abolished the binding of the ARE-BPs in a concentration-dependent manner. This result confirmed that the T-ARE-BPs selectively and specifically recognized the AU-rich sequence of SMUG mRNAs (Fig. 7D) and that the U-rich nature of the oligoribonucleotide is important for the binding.


View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   . Specificity of E-ARE-BP and T-ARE-BPs. A, native EMSA of an epimastigote total protein extract incubated with the 32P-labeled SMUG-L-AU probe and competed with homoribopolymers (poly(A), -(C), -(G), and -(U)) or without competitor (-); RNA, probe alone. B, native EMSA of epimastigote total extract binding reaction competed with in vitro transcribed poly(U), SMUG-L-AU antisense, and SMUG-L-AU sense RNAs. The position of the E-ARE-BP is indicated on the left side of the panel. The molar excess of each competitor is indicated above each panel. C, native EMSA of a trypomastigote total protein extract incubated with the 32P-labeled SMUG-L-AU probe and competed with a 1000-fold molar excess of homoribopolymers (poly(A), -(C), -(G), and -(U)) or without competitor (-); RNA, probe alone. D, native EMSA of a trypomastigote total extract binding reaction competed with in vitro transcribed SMUG-L-AU antisense and SMUG-L-AU sense RNAs. The position of T-ARE-BPs is indicated on the left side of the panel. The molar excess of each competitor is indicated above each panel.

Different Subcellular Localization of ARE RNA-binding Proteins-- The presence of both AU and G-rich binding activities was analyzed in a nuclear and cytoplasmic preparation of T. cruzi epimastigotes and trypomastigotes. Subcellular fractionation was done as described under "Experimental Procedures." These experiments showed that the E-ARE-BP is mainly cytosolic or that the E-ARE-BP might recognize the SMUG-L-AU RNA only in the cytoplasm and not in the nucleus (see "Discussion") (Fig. 8A). In contrast, the 45-50-kDa T-ARE-BPs are localized in similar amounts in both compartments, nucleus and cytoplasm (Fig. 8C).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   E-ARE-BP recognized the AU-rich RNA instability element in the cytoplasm, while T-ARE-BPs are localized in nucleus and cytoplasm. A, subcellular localization of the E-ARE-BP RNA-binding protein determined by in vitro binding reaction of different protein extracts with the SMUG-L-AU RNA. Epimastigote stage of the parasite were lysed with Nonidet P-40 as described under "Experimental Procedures" (T) or separated into fractions containing nuclei (N), cytosol (C), polysomes (P), and postribosomal supernatant (PS). Equal number of parasite (10 × 106) equivalents were utilized for the in vitro binding reactions and electrophoresed in a native polyacrylamide gel with the indicated RNA probes. B, polysome extract of the epimastigote stage of the parasite was pre-treated (+) or not (-) with RNase A, and inactivated with RnasiN as indicated under "Experimental Procedures," prior to incubation with the SMUG-L-AU probe. C, subcellular localization of trypomastigote ARE-BPs (T-AREBPs) determined as in panel A.

ARE-binding proteins of higher eukaryotes were shown to be associated with polysomes, and this particular localization was due to a translational regulatory mechanism conferred by those trans-acting factors (41-43). In a previous work, we reported that the ARE motif positively regulates translation efficiency in the epimastigote stage of the parasite (1), as is the case with the ARE sequences in TNF-alpha and some cytokine and proto-oncogene mRNAs (44). A polysome fraction (P) of T. cruzi epimastigotes was prepared as described previously (36) in the presence of cycloheximide to freeze ribosomes. After extract preparation and centrifugation through a sucrose cushion, the supernatant was saved as a postribosomal preparation (PS) and the pellet was saved as polysomes (P). All the extracts were analyzed in an in vitro binding reaction with the SMUG-L-AU RNA template. The polysome extract was shown to have some AU-rich sequence binding activity, but minimal in comparison to the one observed in the postribosomal fraction (Fig. 8A). To further determine if the lack of a strong shifted band in the polysome fraction was due to the presence of some endogenous U-rich RNA competitor that might be sequestering part of E-ARE-BP, the extract was pre-treated with ribonuclease A (RNase A) as described previously (37), and the nuclease was inactivated prior to perform the in vitro binding reaction with the SMUG-L-AU RNA probe. The result shown in Fig. 8B demonstrate that, in the presence of RNase, the binding of E-ARE-BP is increased 4.5-fold, suggesting that there might be some RNA competing with the labeled AU-rich RNA in the polysome fraction. Moreover, the RNA probe remains intact after incubation with the polysome extract. Thus, the absence of such a strong band in these fraction was not due to the presence of a polysome-associated nuclease that could recognize the ARE sequence (Fig. 8B).

We conclude that E-ARE-BP is mainly cytoplasmic and may be partially associated to polysomes, whereas T-ARE-BPs are localized in both compartments and may be nuclear-cytoplasm shuttling RNA-binding proteins.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In this work we have obtained evidence for the existence of novel cis-elements localized in the 3'-UTR of SMUG mucins from T. cruzi that control both mRNA stability and translation efficiency. In addition to the AU-rich element involved in the selective mRNA destabilization of mucin transcripts in the metacyclic trypomastigote stage of the parasite (Ref. 1 and this work), new negative and positive cis-elements have now been identified. First, a small GRE, composed of the first 27-nt downstream stop codon and containing two contiguous CGGGG pentamers, functions as a positive element only in the epimastigote stage of the parasite. Second, deletion of another element in the construction SMUG-LDelta 1, named here E1 and localized between nucleotides 28 and 62 of the 3'-UTR, increases the half-life of a cat reporter mRNA (Fig. 1), suggesting that this sequence acts as a negative element. Finally, deletion of the 450-base pair retrotransposon SIRE also produces the same effect as the element E1, but, given the large size of SIRE sequence, further work is required to confirm this effect. It was shown previously that SIRE is responsible for the down-regulation of gene expression of the TCP2beta ribosomal protein by altering its trans-splicing efficiency (45). Thus, different functions might be assigned to sequences within this retrotransposon. Indeed, it was reported that U-rich regions and also the length of the 3'-UTR positively regulate mRNA polyadenylation and the translation efficiency of a reporter gene (11). Although GRE sequence is sufficient to up-regulate SMUG mRNA abundance, E1 has a dual effect on mRNA stability and translation, regulating both processes in a negative manner. It is not unprecedented for a single element to have two functions, since AU-rich sequences within the 3'-UTR of TNF-alpha affect both mRNA abundance and translation efficiency (46-48).

Two functionally different cis-elements, ARE and GRE, were identified. The ARE was involved in mRNA destabilization in the infective stage of the parasite, but not in the replicative epimastigote stage, because mRNAs from SMUG-L and SMUG-LDelta AU constructs have similar half-lives in the latter stage (Fig. 3). These results further support the idea that the RNA-binding protein(s) that recognize the ARE in the epimastigote stage of the parasite, might provide resistance to endo- or exonucleolytic cleavage rather than providing actively mRNA protection. Conversely, GRE sequences have a different effect on mRNA stability throughout parasite development. It up-regulates SMUG mRNA abundance in the epimastigote stage, since deletion of the GRE motif makes the mRNA more labile (Fig. 3, B and C). The presence of the ARE sequence within the 3'-UTR of mucin SMUG mRNA also have been shown to modulate translation efficiency in a positive manner (1). In contrast, GRE had no considerable effect on translational levels, suggesting that both elements might coordinately cooperate in the in vivo regulation of SMUG mRNA abundance in the epimastigote stage of the parasite, but not in translation. Coordinated interaction between different negative and positive cis-elements was observed in the 3'-UTR of procyclic mRNAs of African trypanosomes, affecting both mRNA abundance and translation efficiency (12).

Cellular factors interacting with RNA motifs that regulate mRNA stability have not been identified yet in trypanosomes. Evidence showing that GRE and ARE RNA sequences interact with different cellular trans-acting factors has now been obtained (Figs. 4 and 6, and summarized in the model of Fig. 9). Three GRE-forming ribonucleoprotein complexes were detected. Two of them, named G-complex 1 and G-complex 2, were specifically and efficiently competed by poly(G) homoribopolymer (Fig. 4C). G-complex 1 is formed by a single protein band whose apparent molecular mass is 80 kDa, and G-complex 2 is composed of several factors whose molecular masses were about 35, 39, and 66 kDa. This suggests that the 80-kDa protein of G-complex 1 directly recognized GRE sequence. In the case of G-complex 2, the three proteins might also be involved in protein-protein interactions. The presence of large complexes might regulate mRNA expression in a coordinated way, depending on the proteins that compose it or the protein-protein interactions that are produced during the different stages of the parasite. Since the presence of the ARE within SMUG-L 3'-UTR led to a rapid mRNA decay, it is possible that a coordinated interaction between GRE-binding proteins with ARE-BPs and/or other protein factors not identified yet might determine the final mucin SMUG mRNA stability (Fig. 9).


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   A model for the post-transcriptional regulatory mechanism acting on mucin SMUG mRNA stability in different stages of T. cruzi development. GRE RNA-binding proteins (G-80, G-35, G-50, and G-66) are present in both epimastigote and metacyclic trypomastigote stages of the parasite. E-ARE-BP (a 100-kDa ARE-binding protein) is only detected in the epimastigote stage and might protect mucin SMUG mRNA from degradation. The 45-50-kDa T-ARE-BPs are only detected in the other three developmental stages of the parasite. Additional cellular factors forming part of an mRNA decay machinery or translational apparatus might interact with the T-ARE-BPs and E-ARE-BP, respectively.

A model for the post-transcriptional regulatory mechanism acting on mucin SMUG mRNA and mediated by ARE and GRE RNA-binding proteins is shown in Fig. 9. E-ARE-BP, only expressed in the epimastigote stage, might be a positive trans-acting factor interacting with the ARE and protecting SMUG mRNA from degradation. E-ARE-BP binding could also prevent the association of the destabilizing factor(s) to those mRNAs, possibly through competition for binding to similar cis-elements. Indeed, E-ARE-BP might be one of the proteins involved in the modulation of the translation activity mediated by the ARE motif (1), probably through the interaction with other cellular factors of the translational apparatus. On the other hand, GRE RNA-binding proteins are always present during the life cycle of T. cruzi (Fig. 9). The possibility that an ARE-GRE-complex exists in vivo, and that this whole complex or some complex-forming proteins interact with a poly(A)binding protein or other cellular factor(s) to prevent the attack of a deadenylase activity, remains to be investigated. It is well known that, in mammalian cells, a large complex is formed by several proteins having different affinities for poly(C) homoribopolymer, such as the assembly of the alpha -globin mRNA stability complex in the pyrimidine-rich region of the globin 3'-UTR (22).

The results obtained by subcellular fractionation suggest that E-ARE-BP is localized in the cytoplasm or only recognized the RNA in this cellular compartment, where mRNA decay or translational processes take place. Future experiments on Western blot analysis would permit us to determine if E-ARE-BP is also present in the nucleus and, thus, is recruited by some complex-forming proteins. Conversely, the ARE-BPs, at least in the trypomastigote stage, are present in similar amounts in both nucleus and cytoplasm and might be shuttling RNA-binding proteins (Fig. 8). G-complexes forming proteins, at least G-complex 2, might be formed by RNA-binding factors that showed a shuttling behavior between nucleus and cytoplasm. Consequently, it is possible that those GRE RNA-binding proteins might protect the messenger during transport between both compartments. Several proteins in higher eukaryotes were shown to present a shuttling behavior between nucleus and cytoplasm (18, 20, 49). In trypanosomes a classical nuclear localization signal was identified and shown to be functional in the La and histone H2B proteins (50). A regulated nuclear-cytoplasm export pathway mediated by CRM1 also might be present in kinetoplastid parasites, since leptomycin B affects the axenic growth of the epimastigote form of the parasite.2 Leptomycin B inhibits the formation of the complex formed by nuclear export signal-containing proteins, RanGTP, and the receptor CRM1 (51).

Post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms, such as the ones mediated by ARE or GRE sequences, may be required for a quick response to change mucin core molecules expression pattern, triggering parasite adaptation to sudden changes on the environment. In this regard, expression of the correct surface mucin coat may be of central importance for parasite survival. Identification of an in vivo role for these ARE and GRE RNA-binding proteins in the mRNA stability of T. cruzi transcripts may allow proposal of a model of RNA metabolism and maturation in parasites that are deficient in the regulation by RNA polymerase II transcription.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are indebted to Berta Franke de Cazzulo and Liliana Sferco for parasite cultures. We are also most grateful to Dr. J. M. Kelly for providing us the pTEX vector, and Drs. J. J. Cazzulo and S. Silberstein for critical reading of the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by grants from the Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (Argentina) and the United Nations Developmental Program/World Bank/World Health Organization Special Program for Tropical Diseases.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Postgraduate fellow of the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina.

§ Supported in part by an International Research Scholar grant from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Researcher of the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Inst. de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas, Universidad Nacional de General San Martín, INTI, Av. Gral. Paz s/n, Edificio 24, Casilla de Correo 30, 1650 San Martín, Pcia. de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Tel.: 54-11-4752-9639; Fax: 54-11-4580-7255; E-mail: cfrasch@iib.unsam.edu.ar.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 13, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M010959200

2 I. D'Orso and A. C. C. Frasch, unpublished data.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: UTR, untranslated region; ARE, AU-rich element; GRE, G-rich element; ARE-BP, AU-rich element binding protein; ActD, actinomycin D; EMSA, electrophoresis mobility shift assay; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; nt, nucleotide(s); SIRE, short interspersed repeat element; CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; TBE, Tris-borate EDTA; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Di Noia, J. M., D'Orso, I., Sanchez, D. O., and Frasch, A. C. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 10218-10227[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Pays, E., and Nolan, D. P. (1998) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 91, 3-36[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Roditi, I., Furger, A., Ruepp, S., Schurch, N., and Butikofer, P. (1998) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 91, 117-130[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Cross, G. A., Wirtz, L. E., and Navarro, M. (1998) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 91, 77-91[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Ben Amar, M. F., Jefferies, D., Pays, A., Bakalara, N., Kendall, G., and Pays, E. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 5857-5862[Abstract]
6. Lee, M. G. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 1220-1230[Abstract]
7. Matthews, K. R., Tschudi, C., and Ullu, E. (1994) Genes Dev. 8, 491-501[Abstract]
8. Vanhamme, L., and Pays, E. (1995) Microbiol. Rev. 59, 223-240[Abstract]
9. Wilson, M. E., Paetz, K. E., Ramamoorthy, R., and Donelson, J. E. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 15731-15736[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Berberof, M., Vanhamme, L., Tebabi, P., Pays, A., Jefferies, D., Welburn, S., and Pays, E. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 2925-2934[Abstract]
11. Nozaki, T., and Cross, G. A. (1995) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 75, 55-67[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Furger, A., Schurch, N., Kurath, U., and Roditi, I. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 4372-4380[Abstract]
13. Hotz, H. R., Hartmann, C., Huober, K., Hug, M., and Clayton, C. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3017-26[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Coughlin, B. C., Teixeira, S. M., Kirchhoff, L. V., and Donelson, J. E. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 12051-12060[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Caput, D., Beutler, B., Hartog, K., Thayer, R., Brown-Shimer, S., and Cerami, A. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 1670-1674[Abstract]
16. Shaw, G., and Kamen, R. (1986) Cell 46, 659-667[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Chen, C. A., and Shyu, A. (1995) Trends Biochem. Sci. 20, 465-470[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Fan, X. C., and Steitz, J. A. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 3448-3460[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Peng, S. S., Chen, C. Y., Xu, N., and Shyu, A. B. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 3461-3470[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Loflin, P., Chen, C. Y., and Shyu, A. B. (1999) Genes Dev. 13, 1884-1897[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Wang, X., Kiledjian, M., Weiss, I. M., and Liebhaber, S. A. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 1769-1777[Abstract]
22. Wang, Z., Day, N., Trifillis, P., and Kiledjian, M. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 4552-4560[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Kiledjian, M., DeMaria, C. T., Brewer, G., and Novick, K. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 4870-4876[Abstract]
24. Pereira-Chioccola, V. L., Acosta-Serrano, A., Correia de Almeida, I., Ferguson, M. A., Souto-Padron, T., Rodrigues, M. M., Travassos, L. R., and Schenkman, S. (2000) J. Cell Sci. 113, 1299-1307[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Van Klinken, B. J. W., Dekker, J., Buller, H. A., and Einerhand, A. W. C. (1995) Am. J. Physiol. 269, G613-G627[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Di Noia, J. M., D'Orso, I., Aslund, L., Sanchez, D. O., and Frasch, A. C. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 10843-10850[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Frasch, A. C. (2000) Parasitol. Today 16, 282-286[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Zingales, B., Pereira, M. E., Oliveira, R. P., Almeida, K. A., Umezawa, E. S., Souto, R. P., Vargas, N., Cano, M. I., da Silveira, J. F., Nehme, N. S., Morel, C. M., Brener, Z., and Macedo, A. (1997) Acta Trop. 68, 159-173[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Gonzalez Cappa, S. M., Bijovsky, A. T., Freilij, H., Muller, L., and Katzin, A. M. (1981) Medicina 41, 119-120[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Charest, H., Zhang, W. W., and Matlashewski, G. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 17081-17090[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Maranon, C., Puerta, C., Alonso, C., and Lopez, M. C. (1998) Mol Biochem. Parasitol 92, 313-324[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Martinez-Calvillo, S., Lopez, I., and Hernandez, R. (1997) Gene (Amst.) 199, 71-76[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Kelly, J. M., Ward, H. M., Miles, M. A., and Kendall, G. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 3963-3969[Abstract]
34. Smith, C. (1998) in RNA-Protein Interactions: A Practical Approach (Hames, B., ed) , pp. 109-136, Oxford University Press, Inc., New York
35. Mahmood, R., and Ray, D. S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 23729-23734[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Gonzalez, N., and Cazzulo, J. (1989) Biochem. Pharmacol. 38, 2873-2877[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Akhtar, A., Zink, D., and Becker, P. B. (2000) Nature 407, 405-409[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Fourney, R. M., Miyakoshi, J., Day, R. S., III, and Paterson, M. (1978) Focus 10, 5-9
39. Mertz, L., and Rashtchian, A. (1994) Focus 16, 45-48
40. Vazquez, M. P., Schijman, A. G., and Levin, M. J. (1994) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 64, 327-336[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Winstall, E., Gamache, M., and Raymond, V. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 3796-3804[Abstract]
42. Nagy, E., and Rigby, W. F. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 2755-2763[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Zhang, W., Wagner, B. J., Ehrenman, K., Schaefer, A. W., DeMaria, C. T., Crater, D., DeHaven, K., Long, L., and Brewer, G. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 7652-7665[Abstract]
44. Kruys, V., Marinx, O., Shaw, G., Deschamps, J., and Huez, G. (1989) Science 245, 852-855[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Vazquez, M. P., and Levin, M. J. (1998) Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 93, 161[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Xu, N., Chen, C. Y., and Shyu, A. B. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 4611-4621[Abstract]
47. Lai, W. S., Carballo, E., Strum, J. R., Kennington, E. A., Phillips, R. S., and Blackshear, P. J. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 4311-4323[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Carballo, E., Lai, W. S., and Blackshear, P. J. (1998) Science 281, 1001-1005[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Shyu, A. B., and Wilkinson, M. F. (2000) Cell 102, 135-138[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Marchetti, M. A., Tschudi, C., Kwon, H., Wolin, S. L., and Ullu, E. (2000) J. Cell Sci. 113, 899-906[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51. Fornerod, M., Ohno, M., Yoshida, M., and Mattaj, I. W. (1997) Cell 90, 1051-1060[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.