Calmodulin Enhances the Stability of the Estrogen Receptor*

Zhigang Li, John L. JoyalDagger, and David B. Sacks§

From the Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115

Received for publication, November 9, 2000, and in revised form, February 14, 2001


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The estrogen receptor mediates breast cell proliferation and is the principal target for chemotherapy of breast carcinoma. Previous studies have demonstrated that the estrogen receptor binds to calmodulin-Sepharose in vitro. However, the association of endogenous calmodulin with endogenous estrogen receptors in intact cells has not been reported, and the function of the interaction is obscure. Here we demonstrate by co-immunoprecipitation from MCF-7 human breast epithelial cells that endogenous estrogen receptors bind to endogenous calmodulin. Estradiol treatment of the cells had no significant effect on the interaction. However, incubation of the cells with tamoxifen enhanced by 5-10-fold the association of calmodulin with the estrogen receptor and increased the total cellular content of estrogen receptors by 1.5-2-fold. In contrast, the structurally distinct calmodulin antagonists trifluoperazine and CGS9343B attenuated the interaction between calmodulin and the estrogen receptor and dramatically reduced the number of estrogen receptors in the cell. Neither of these agents altered the amount of estrogen receptor mRNA, suggesting that calmodulin stabilizes the protein. This hypothesis is supported by the observation that, in the presence of Ca2+, calmodulin protected estrogen receptors from in vitro proteolysis by trypsin. Furthermore, overexpression of wild type calmodulin, but not a mutant calmodulin incapable of binding Ca2+, increased the concentration of estrogen receptors in MCF-7 cells, whereas transient expression of a calmodulin inhibitor peptide reduced the estrogen receptor concentration. These data demonstrate that calmodulin binds to the estrogen receptor in intact cells in a Ca2+-dependent, but estradiol-independent, manner, thereby modulating the stability and the steady state level of estrogen receptors.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Alterations in intracellular free Ca2+ concentrations are frequently translated into cellular events via the Ca2+ sensor protein, calmodulin. Calmodulin, an acidic effector protein that regulates multiple intracellular processes (1), has an essential role in cell proliferation and cell cycle progression (2-4). Inactivation of calmodulin blocks the cell cycle (4, 5), whereas overexpression of calmodulin in a mouse mammary cell line increases the rate of cell division (4). In addition, calmodulin is directly involved in DNA synthesis (2). Interestingly, calmodulin concentrations are increased in several malignancies, including those of the liver (6), lung (7), keratinocytes (8), and breast (9-11). Whether the increased calmodulin contributes to neoplastic transformation or is a consequence of the altered cellular homeostasis that occurs during malignancy has not been ascertained.

It has been reported that calmodulin associates in vitro in a Ca2+-dependent manner with the estrogen receptor isolated from rat uterus cytosol (12, 13), and that this interaction stimulates binding of the estrogen receptor to the estrogen response element (13). The estrogen receptor, which regulates the expression of specific genes and participates in breast cell proliferation (14), is the principal target for chemotherapy of breast carcinoma (15). Several lines of evidence implicate a role for Ca2+ and calmodulin in mediating the actions of estrogen as follows. (i) Estrogen induces Ca2+ fluxes in breast carcinoma cells (16); (ii) Ca2+ channel antagonists inhibit the proliferation of breast carcinoma cells (17); (iii) tamoxifen, the primary chemotherapeutic agent used to treat breast cancer, deregulates intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis (18); (iv) sustained increased intranuclear Ca2+ concentrations induce DNA fragmentation and apoptosis of breast cancer cells in a calmodulin-dependent manner (19); (v) calmodulin stimulates tyrosine phosphorylation and activation of the estrogen receptor (20); and (vi) calmodulin is required for the formation of the estrogen receptor-estrogen response element complex and for activation of an estrogen responsive promotor (21). Together these findings suggest that Ca2+/calmodulin could be a participant in the mitogenic effects of estrogen. Therefore, we set out to examine the physiological significance of the interaction of calmodulin with the estrogen receptor.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- The antibody to calmodulin was described previously (22). The anti-estrogen receptor antibody was obtained from Santa Cruz. Calmodulin-Sepharose was purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Affi-Gel was from Bio-Rad. Tissue culture reagents were obtained from Life Technologies, Inc. Fetal bovine serum was from BioWhittaker. Restriction enzymes were purchased from New England Biolabs. Purified human estrogen receptor was from PanVera, Ca2+-free pig brain calmodulin was obtained from Ocean Biologics, and sequencing grade L-1-tosylamide-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone -treated trypsin was obtained from Promega. All other reagents were of standard analytical grade.

Cell Culture and Lysis-- MCF-7 human breast epithelial cells were grown to 80% confluence in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal bovine serum. To examine the effect of estradiol, the medium was replaced with phenol red-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, and the fetal bovine serum was treated with dextran-coated charcoal (23). Where indicated, cells were treated with estradiol, tamoxifen, or the calmodulin antagonists trifluoperazine (TFP)1 or CGS9343B. The concentrations and incubation times are indicated in the figure legends. To lyse the cells, the medium was removed, cells were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (145 mM NaC1, 12 mM Na2HPO4, and 4 mM NaH2PO4, pH 7.2) and 1 ml of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-base, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.1 mg/ml leupeptin, aprotonin, and pepstatin containing 1 mM CaCl2 or 1 mM EGTA) was added. The lysates were collected and quick-frozen in methanol/solid CO2.

Construction of Plasmids and Transfection-- The mammalian expression vector, POPI3, was purchased from Stratagene. An oligonucleotide linker flanked by NotI and AflII-containing XbaI, SmaI, and BlpI cleavage sites was fashioned and inserted into the NotI and AflII sites of POPI3. This introduced XbaI, SmaI and BlpI sites in the polylinker region to form POPI3-Xb. A puromycin resistance gene was removed from pBabe-puro (24) with BamHI and ClaI. The fragment was treated with S1 nuclease to form blunt ends. POPI3 was digested with AatII and treated with calf intestinal phosphatase to prevent self ligation. The puromycin gene was ligated into the AatII site to form POPI3-Xb-puro.

The vector containing the cDNA for mammalian calmodulin was obtained from Dr. A. Persechini (University of Rochester, Rochester, NY) and was designated pMZ-xCaM1 (25). To excise the calmodulin cDNA for insertion into POPI3-Xb-puro, the PstI site of pMZ-xCaM1 was changed to an AflII site by insertion of an oligonucleotide linker containing AflII and SalI sites flanked by PstI. The vector was digested with NcoI, then treated with Klenow enzyme and deoxynucleotides to form a blunt end, and finally, digested with AflII. To accommodate the fragment, POPI3-Xb-puro was digested with AflII and XbaI. The fragment was ligated with the vector to form POPI3-Xb-puro-mCaM.

The vector containing the cDNA for mutant calmodulin that does not bind Ca2+ (CaMDelta Ca) was a gift from Dr. K. Beckingham (Rice University, Houston, TX) and was designated pRK5 (26). To excise the calmodulin cDNA for insertion into POPI3-Xb-puro, pRK7 was first digested with BlpI, then treated with S1 nuclease to form a blunt end, and finally, digested with XbaI. To accommodate the fragment, POPI3-Xb-puro was digested with BlpI, treated with S1 nuclease to form a blunt end, and then digested with XbaI. The fragment was ligated with the vector to form POPI3-Xb-puro-CaMDelta Ca.

A synthetic gene encoding the calmodulin binding sequence of myosin light chain kinase inserted in the eukaryotic expression vector pSVL (27) was kindly provided by Dr. John Dedman (University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH). Transient transfection of this construct into mammalian cells neutralizes calmodulin function (27).

Vectors were transiently transfected into MCF-7 cells by the calcium phosphate precipitation method. After 6 h, the medium was replaced with 10% glycerol in phosphate-buffered saline for 3 min. Cells were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline and returned to Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. Unless indicated otherwise, cells were lysed 48 h post-transfection.

Calmodulin-Sepharose Chromatography-- Cell lysates, normalized for total protein, were incubated for 2 h at 4 °C with 2 ml of calmodulin-Sepharose in the presence of 1 mM CaCl2 or 1 mM EGTA. Samples were washed five times in lysis buffer containing 1 mM CaCl2 or 1 mM EGTA, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotting was performed as described below.

Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting-- Equal amounts of protein lysate were immunoprecipitated with anti-calmodulin monoclonal antibody linked to Affi-Gel as described previously (28). Samples were washed five times in lysis buffer, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane. Immunoblots were probed with anti-estrogen receptor or anti-calmodulin antibody. Complexes were visualized with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody and developed by enhanced chemiluminescence.

For immunoprecipitation of pure proteins, 1 µg of estrogen receptor was incubated with 1 µM tamoxifen or an equal volume of vehicle at 4 °C. After 30 min, 5 µg of calmodulin was added in lysis buffer (final volume of 300 µl) containing 1 mM CaC12 or 1 mM EGTA, and incubation was continued for 30 min. Samples were immunoprecipitated with anti-calmodulin antibody and processed by Western blotting as described above.

In Vitro Proteolysis of the Estrogen Receptor-- Pure estrogen receptor (8 µg) was incubated at 4 °C with 10.5 µg calmodulin (5-fold molar excess) or 10.5 µg of myoglobin in 125 µl of 50 mM Tris, pH 7.6, containing 1 mM Ca2+ or 1 mM EGTA. After 20 min, L-1-tosylamide-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone-treated trypsin (1:100 trypsin:estrogen receptor, w/w) was added, and samples were incubated at 25 °C. At the time points indicated in the figure legend, 30-µl aliquots were removed from the reaction mixture and immediately added to boiling SDS. Samples were resolved by 12% SDS-PAGE, and proteins were detected with Coomassie Blue R-250. The extent of digestion, expressed relative to undigested protein, was quantified by laser-scanning densitometry from Coomassie Blue-stained gels.

Isolation of RNA and Northern Blot Analysis-- Total RNA was isolated from MCF-7 cells with RNAzol B (Teltest, Inc.). Two micrograms of RNA was mixed with denaturing buffer (60% deionized formamide, 7% formaldehyde, 1× borate buffer, 6% glycerol, 0.02% bromphenol blue, and 0.02% xylene cyanol), resolved on a 1% agarose, 3% formaldehyde gel in borate buffer (5 mM boric acid, 5 mM sodium borate, 10 mM sodium sulfate, and 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0), transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane, and cross-linked with UV light. The estrogen receptor cDNA (kindly provided by Dr. P. Yen, National Institutes of Health) was removed from pcDNA3 with EcoRI and purified by low melt agarose. Approximately 20 ng of estrogen receptor cDNA was labeled with [32P]dCTP using a random primer labeling kit obtained from Life Technologies, Inc. Northern blots were probed with radiolabeled cDNA, and estrogen receptor mRNA was identified by autoradiography.

Miscellaneous Methods-- Protein determinations were performed using the DC protein assay from Bio-Rad. RNA was quantified by spectrophotometry. Densitometry of the bands on the gels, the autoradiographs, and the enhanced chemiluminescence signals was performed with NIH-Image. Statistical significance was evaluated by Student's t test using InStat software (GraphPad Software, Inc.).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Binding of Estrogen Receptors to Calmodulin-- The interaction of calmodulin with the estrogen receptor was initially characterized in MCF-7 breast epithelial cells by calmodulin-Sepharose chromatography. This approach demonstrated that calmodulin binds to the estrogen receptor (Fig. 1B), corroborating previous observations with cytosol from rat uterus (12, 13). Binding of the estrogen receptor to calmodulin-Sepharose was abrogated when Ca2+ was chelated with EGTA (data not shown). To evaluate the effect of estradiol and tamoxifen on the association of calmodulin with the estrogen receptor, we first examined the level of estrogen receptors in cells incubated with each agent (Fig. 1A). Estradiol alone decreased the concentration of estrogen receptors by 50%, whereas tamoxifen increased the amount of estrogen receptor in the cell lysate by 1.5-2-fold; inclusion of estradiol during cell culture prevented the augmentation by tamoxifen (Fig. 1A). Analysis by calmodulin-Sepharose chromatography revealed that estradiol treatment did not substantially alter the binding of estrogen receptors to calmodulin (Fig. 1B). In contrast, 1 µM tamoxifen enhanced binding of the estrogen receptor to calmodulin by 5-10-fold (Fig. 1B). The enhanced binding induced by tamoxifen is substantially greater than the 1.5-2-fold increase in estrogen receptor content produced by tamoxifen. When cells were treated with both tamoxifen and estradiol, the increased binding of estrogen receptors to calmodulin produced by tamoxifen was attenuated (Fig. 1B). Under the conditions tested, neither estradiol (data not shown) nor tamoxifen (Fig. 2) influenced the amount of calmodulin in the cells nor the amount of calmodulin immunoprecipitated.


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Binding of calmodulin to the estrogen receptor. MCF-7 cells, treated for 16 h with either vehicle, 10 nM estradiol (E2), 1 µM tamoxifen (Tam), or both agents, were washed three times as described under "Experimental Procedures." A, cells were lysed, and equal amounts of protein were resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF membranes, and probed with anti-estrogen receptor antibody. Complexes were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence. B, equal amounts of protein from MCF-7 cell lysates were incubated with calmodulin (CaM)-Sepharose in the presence of 1 mM CaCl2. After washing the beads, proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and processed as described above. C, equal amounts of protein were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-calmodulin antibody (alpha CaM), described under "Experimental Procedures." Samples were processed as described under B above. The position of migration of the estrogen receptor (ER) is indicated. Data are representative of at least two independent experimental determinations. D, pure estrogen receptor was incubated with 1 µM tamoxifen or vehicle. After 30 min, 5 µg of calmodulin was added in the presence of 1 mM Ca2+ or 1 mM EGTA. Samples were immunoprecipitated with anti-calmodulin antibody and processed as described under B above.


View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Immunoprecipitation of the estrogen receptor with calmodulin. MCF-7 cells, treated for 16 h with either vehicle or the indicated concentrations of tamoxifen (Tam), were lysed, and equal amounts of protein were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-calmodulin monoclonal antibody (panel A) or applied directly to SDS gels (panel B) as described under "Experimental Procedures." Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF membranes, and probed with anti-estrogen receptor or anti-calmodulin antibody. The positions of migration of the estrogen receptor (ER) and calmodulin (CaM) are indicated. Data are representative of two independent experimental determinations.

Co-immunoprecipitation of Estrogen Receptors with Calmodulin and the Effect of Tamoxifen on the Interaction-- Although the in vitro interaction of estrogen receptors with calmodulin-Sepharose has been described (12, 13), the binding of estrogen receptors to endogenous calmodulin in intact cells has not been previously reported. Binding of endogenous calmodulin to the estrogen receptor was revealed by co-immunoprecipitation using anti-calmodulin monoclonal antibody (Fig. 1C). Analogous to the data obtained with calmodulin-Sepharose, co-immunoprecipitation demonstrated that estradiol did not significantly alter the interaction between the estrogen receptor and calmodulin. Although fewer estrogen receptors co-immunoprecipitated with calmodulin in cells stimulated with estradiol than in control cells (Fig. 1C, compare lanes 1 and 2), the magnitude of the decrease was similar to that produced by estradiol in cell lysates (Fig. 1A). These data indicate that estradiol does not significantly modulate the binding of the estrogen receptor to calmodulin. By contrast, tamoxifen substantially enhanced in a dose-dependent manner the interaction between calmodulin and the estrogen receptor (Fig. 2A). The maximum increase was observed at 0.25-0.5 µM tamoxifen. Although tamoxifen also increased the total amount of estrogen receptor in the cells, the magnitude of the increase was substantially less than the magnitude of the increase in the amount of estrogen receptor that co-immunoprecipitated with calmodulin (compare Figs. 2, A and B). Moreover, the maximum increase in total estrogen receptors was detected at 0.5-1 µM tamoxifen, a concentration slightly higher than that at which maximum binding was observed. Neither the total amount of calmodulin in the cell nor the amount of calmodulin immunoprecipitated was significantly altered by treatment (Fig. 2).

To verify that the tamoxifen-induced augmentation of the interaction between calmodulin and the estrogen receptor is direct, in vitro analysis with pure proteins was performed. Pure estrogen receptors were preincubated with tamoxifen or vehicle, followed by incubation with calmodulin. The amount of estrogen receptor that co-immunoprecipitated with calmodulin was increased approximately 2-fold by tamoxifen (Fig. 1D). Chelation of Ca2+ with EGTA revealed that the binding of estrogen receptors to calmodulin is Ca2+-dependent (Fig. 1D).

Effect of Calmodulin Antagonists on the Interaction between Estrogen Receptors and Calmodulin-- To examine the function of the interaction of calmodulin with the estrogen receptor, cells were incubated with two structurally distinct, cell-permeable calmodulin antagonists, TFP (29) or CGS9343B (30). Exposure to 10 µM TFP or 40 µM CGS9343B for 16 h reduced the total number of estrogen receptors in the cells to 50% of control and virtually undetectable levels, respectively (Fig. 3A). These concentrations of the antagonists had no effect on cell viability (data not shown). CGS9343B induced a dose-dependent decrease in the number of estrogen receptors; this reduction was not modulated by estradiol (Fig. 3B). The effect of the calmodulin antagonists was specific for estrogen receptors as they did not alter the amount of cellular IQGAP1 (data not shown), a major calmodulin-binding protein in breast epithelial cells (28).


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Effect of calmodulin antagonists on estrogen receptor content. A, MCF-7 cells, treated for 16 h with vehicle, 10 µM TFP, or 40 µM CGS9343B, were lysed, and equal amounts of protein were applied directly to the gel. Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF membranes, and probed with anti-estrogen receptor antibody. The position of migration of the estrogen receptor (ER) is indicated. B, MCF-7 cells were incubated with the indicated concentrations of CGS9343B in the absence (Control) or presence of estradiol (E2) for 16 h. Equal amounts of protein lysate were resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF membranes, and probed with anti-estrogen receptor antibody. The relative amount of estrogen receptor was quantified. The results, presented in the bottom panel, are expressed as percentages of the value of the untreated cells (no CGS9343B). Note that, compared with control cells, the amount of estrogen receptor in estradiol-treated cells is reduced. Data are representative of at least two independent experimental determinations.

To examine the effects of the antagonists on the interaction between calmodulin and the estrogen receptor, cells were incubated with each calmodulin antagonist for a short time period. Treatment of MCF-7 cells with TFP or CGS9343B for 30 min altered neither the total amount of estrogen receptor nor of calmodulin in the cell lysate (Fig. 4B). By contrast, the amount of estrogen receptor bound to calmodulin was decreased by both TFP and CGS9343B (Fig. 4A). Compared with vehicle, the relative amount of estrogen receptor that co-immunoprecipitated with calmodulin was 0.42 ± 0.04 and 0.38 ± 0.04 (mean ± S.E., n = 3; p < 0.001) for TFP and CGS9343B, respectively (Fig. 4C).


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Effect of calmodulin antagonists on the interaction between calmodulin and the estrogen receptor. MCF-7 cells were treated for 30 min with vehicle, 25 µM TFP or 40 µM CGS9343B. Cells were lysed, and equal amounts of protein were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-calmodulin monoclonal antibody (alpha CaM) (panel A) or applied directly to SDS gels (panel B) as described under "Experimental Procedures." Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF membranes, and probed with anti-estrogen receptor or anti-calmodulin antibody. The positions of migration of the estrogen receptor (ER) and calmodulin (CaM) are indicated. Data are representative of three independent experimental determinations. C, the relative amount of estrogen receptor that co-immunoprecipitated with calmodulin in A was quantified. The results represent means ± S.E., relative to control (vehicle), of three independent experimental determinations. *, significantly different from no treatment (p < 0.001).

Effect of Calmodulin Antagonists on Estrogen Receptor Gene Expression-- Taken together, our data demonstrate that stimulation and inhibition of the interaction of calmodulin with the estrogen receptor increases and reduces the total cellular content of estrogen receptors, respectively. These results indicate that calmodulin influences either the expression or stability of the estrogen receptor. To discriminate between these two possibilities, Northern blot analysis was compared among MCF-7 cells treated for 16 h with vehicle, tamoxifen, or CGS9343B (Fig. 5). Neither compound significantly altered the amount of estrogen receptor mRNA, indicating that calmodulin does not modulate estrogen receptor gene expression. Thus, calmodulin binding most likely stabilizes the estrogen receptor against proteolysis. This hypothesis was evaluated both in vitro with purified proteins and in intact cells.


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Estrogen receptor mRNA levels in MCF-7 cells. MCF-7 cells were treated for 16 h with vehicle, 1 µM tamoxifen (Tam), or 40 µM CGS9343B. Total RNA was isolated and quantified by spectrophotometry, and equal amounts were resolved on agarose/formaldehyde gels. Northern blot analysis was performed using radiolabeled estrogen receptor cDNA as a probe. A representative autoradiograph is shown with the position of migration of the estrogen receptor mRNA (ER mRNA) indicated.

Effect of Calmodulin on Proteolysis of the Estrogen Receptor in Vitro-- In vitro proteolysis revealed that the estrogen receptor was very sensitive to digestion by L-1-tosylamide-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone-treated trypsin. Incubation at 37 °C (1:7 trypsin:estrogen receptor, w/w) resulted in complete disappearance of the full-length receptor within 1 min (data not shown). Analysis at 25 °C with a very low ratio of trypsin to estrogen receptor (1:100, w/w) was required to detect limited proteolysis (Fig. 6). Because Ca2+ regulates the binding of calmodulin to the estrogen receptor (see Fig. 1D), the effect of calmodulin on proteolysis of the estrogen receptor was performed both in the presence and absence of Ca2+. In the presence of Ca2+, calmodulin reduced the susceptibility of the estrogen receptor to proteolysis by trypsin. The rates of disappearance of intact estrogen receptor and the appearance of degradation products were substantially reduced by Ca2+/calmodulin (Fig. 6A). Myoglobin, which has a molecular mass close to that of calmodulin, was used as a control protein. Chelation of Ca2+, which substantially decreases the activity of trypsin (31), markedly slowed the rate of digestion of the estrogen receptor (compare the samples with myoglobin in Figs. 6, A and B). In the absence of Ca2+, the protective effect of calmodulin on proteolysis of the estrogen receptor by trypsin was substantially attenuated (Fig. 6B).


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Limited proteolysis of estrogen receptors. Pure estrogen receptor (8 µg) was incubated with 10.5 µg of calmodulin (CaM, ) or 10.5 µg of myoglobin (Mb, open circle ) in the presence of 1 mM Ca2+ (panel A) or 1 mM EGTA (panel B). Proteins were incubated with L-1-tosylamide-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone-treated trypsin at 25 °C for 0, 1, 2, or 5 min. Samples were resolved by 12% SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie Blue. The positions of migration of molecular mass standards are indicated on the left, whereas those of intact estrogen receptor (ER), degradation products, calmodulin (CaM), and myoglobin (Mb) are indicated on the right. Lower panels depict optical density scans of full length estrogen receptors. The optical density at time 0 was set at 1. Representative experiments of at least two independent determinations are shown.

Overexpression of Calmodulin or Calmodulin-binding Peptide-- To further evaluate the ability of calmodulin to protect the estrogen receptor in intact cells, MCF-7 cells were transiently transfected with a mammalian expression vector directing the expression of wild type calmodulin or a mutant calmodulin that is incapable of binding Ca2+, CaMDelta Ca (26). Immunoblotting with anti-calmodulin antibodies revealed that the concentration of calmodulin (wild type and mutant) in transfected cells was 1.5-2-fold higher than that in cells transfected with vector alone (Fig. 7A, lower panel). As noted earlier, the binding of calmodulin to the estrogen receptor is dependent upon Ca2+; CaMDelta Ca should therefore not alter the stability of the estrogen receptor. Probing immunoblots of cell lysates with anti-estrogen receptor antibody demonstrated a 1.69 ± 0.27-fold (mean ± S.E., n = 3) increase in the amount of estrogen receptor in cells overexpressing wild type calmodulin (Fig. 7A). By contrast, overexpression of CaMDelta Ca had no effect on the amount of estrogen receptor (Fig. 7A).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Effect of overexpression of calmodulin or calmodulin-binding peptide in MCF-7 cells on levels of the estrogen receptor. A, MCF-7 cells were transiently transfected with a mammalian expression vector, POPI3, containing nothing (V), wild type calmodulin (CaM), or a mutant calmodulin incapable of binding Ca2+(CaMDelta Ca). An equal aliquot of each lysate was resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF membranes, and probed with anti-estrogen receptor or anti-calmodulin antibody. The positions of migration of the estrogen receptor (ER) and calmodulin (CaM) are indicated. Data are representative of two independent experimental determinations. B, MCF-7 cells were transiently transfected with pSVL vector alone (V) or pSVL containing a calmodulin-binding peptide (CaMBP). Equal amounts of protein lysate were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes, and blots were probed with anti-estrogen receptor antibody. Two independent experiments are depicted.

Targeted expression of an inhibitor peptide derived from myosin light chain kinase can neutralize the function of calmodulin in the nucleus of transiently transfected mammalian cells (27). Transient transfection of this peptide into MCF-7 cells decreased by ~50% the total amount of estrogen receptor in the cells after 48 h (Fig. 7B). Thus, selectively increasing or decreasing the relative amount of functional calmodulin resulted in a concomitant increase and decrease, respectively, of estrogen receptor levels in the cells.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Our data clearly document an interaction between endogenous calmodulin and endogenous estrogen receptors in human breast epithelial cells. The binding is regulated by Ca2+, which is required for the interaction. Incubation of MCF-7 cells for 16 h with estradiol or the antiestrogen tamoxifen decreased and increased, respectively, the total amount of estrogen receptor in the cells (see Figs. 1 and 2 and Refs. 32 and 33). Moreover, concentrations of tamoxifen as low as 0.25 µM substantially increased the binding of calmodulin to the estrogen receptor. Tamoxifen acts as a calmodulin antagonist in vitro (34-36) and has been reported to inhibit the binding of the estrogen receptor to calmodulin (12). Our data differ from the last report. Several factors may account for the discrepant results. The studies of Bouhoute and Leclercq (12) were carried out on rat uterine cytosol by adding tamoxifen after cell lysis, at the time of mixing with calmodulin-Sepharose. In our analyses, intact MCF-7 human breast epithelial cells were incubated with tamoxifen, the tamoxifen was removed before the cells were lysed, and calmodulin was immunoprecipitated. This strategy revealed that pretreatment of MCF-7 cells with therapeutic tamoxifen concentrations increased binding of estrogen receptors to calmodulin. Our experimental technique represents the physiological conditions associated with the use of tamoxifen as a chemotherapeutic agent in patients. Moreover, our approach examined interactions between physiologically relevant concentrations of calmodulin and estrogen receptors. Tissue differences are also likely to be relevant. Tamoxifen is an estrogen receptor antagonist in breast, whereas in the uterus it is an estrogen receptor agonist (37). Thus, it is possible that cofactors for the estrogen receptor in the different cell types may alter the interaction of tamoxifen-bound estrogen receptors with calmodulin.

Interestingly, as was observed with purified proteins (21), estradiol did not alter the binding of estrogen receptors to calmodulin. Thus, estradiol and tamoxifen, both of which bind to the estrogen receptor, produce different effects on the interaction between calmodulin and the estrogen receptor. Although the calmodulin binding domain of the estrogen receptor has not been identified, these apparently discrepant data can be interpreted in the context of recently solved crystal structures (38). The conformation of the human estrogen receptor ligand binding domain bound to tamoxifen is distinct from that bound to estradiol (38). Similar findings were obtained using peptides, leading to the suggestion that different estrogen receptor-ligand complexes could contact different proteins within the cell (39). It seems reasonable to infer from our data that the conformation of tamoxifen-bound estrogen receptor has increased affinity for calmodulin, whereas estrogen does not change the conformation of the calmodulin binding domain of the receptor. Another possible, but less likely, explanation is that tamoxifen alters the conformation of calmodulin, thereby increasing binding to the estrogen receptor.

We also documented that the binding of calmodulin directly effects the stability and therefore the steady state level of estrogen receptors. This finding was demonstrated both in vitro with purified estrogen receptors and in intact cells. Two complementary strategies were adopted to establish this finding in intact cells. In the first, we observed that two cell-permeable calmodulin antagonists, namely CGS9343B and TFP, attenuated calmodulin binding to the estrogen receptor and dramatically reduced the cellular content of estrogen receptors. In particular, CGS9343B lowered in a dose-dependent manner the amount of estrogen receptors in MCF-7 cells to virtually undetectable levels at 40 µM CGS9343B. Calmodulin antagonists are frequently used to evaluate the role of calmodulin in cellular functions (40, 41), but at high concentrations have been reported to alter the functions of other proteins. To minimize nonspecific interactions, we used relatively low concentrations of the antagonists, namely 10 µM TFP and 40 µM CGS9343B. Analysis performed with purified proteins in vitro revealed that TFP had an IC50 of 12.5 µM for inhibition of calmodulin-stimulated cAMP phosphodiesterase, whereas CGS9343B was specific for calmodulin at 1000 µM (30), a concentration 25-fold higher than the highest concentration used in this study. Moreover, the two structurally distinct compounds produced similar effects on estrogen receptor concentrations, further decreasing the likelihood of a nonspecific effect.

To validate the results obtained with the calmodulin antagonists, we employed a second approach. The amount of available intracellular calmodulin was increased and decreased by transient expression of the cDNA for calmodulin or the cDNA of a calmodulin-binding peptide, respectively. Increasing intracellular calmodulin concentrations led to estrogen receptor accumulation in MCF-7 cells, whereas the inhibitor peptide mimicked the effect of the calmodulin antagonists and decreased estrogen receptor content. Consistent with the binding and in vitro proteolysis data, analysis with CaMDelta Ca revealed that Ca2+ binding to calmodulin was required for the protective effect on the estrogen receptor. Interestingly, a direct positive correlation has been reported between the concentrations of calmodulin and estrogen receptors in human breast tumors (42).

The mechanism by which calmodulin protects the estrogen receptor from proteolysis is not known. The interaction of calmodulin with targets frequently results in a conformational change in the target protein (1). Thus, the direct binding to calmodulin probably induces a tertiary conformation of the estrogen receptor that restricts access to its normal proteolytic cleavage sites. This model is supported by the in vitro trypsin digestion data presented in Fig. 6. Additional mechanisms may be operative in intact cells. For example, calmodulin could modulate the interaction between the estrogen receptor and other proteins. In addition to binding DNA hormone response elements, estrogen receptors bind to adaptor proteins that modulate their function (43, 44). These include the steroid receptor coactivator (SRC) family, receptor interacting proteins (RIP), and members of the heat shock protein (hsp) family, including hsp90 (43, 45). Although previously unclear, the role of hsp90 in the regulation of the estrogen receptor appears to be a molecular chaperone effect that may be important for the correct folding of the receptor (46). Interestingly, hsp90 also binds calmodulin (47, 48), and this interaction prevents hsp90 from binding to F-actin (47). Moreover, recent evidence documents that calmodulin facilitates the effects of hsp90 on the dissociation of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase from caveolin-1 (49). It is therefore possible that synergistic interactions between calmodulin and hsp90 could stabilize the estrogen receptor.

The estrogen receptor is involved in breast cell proliferation, and exogenous estrogens have been implicated in the development of breast carcinoma (50). Importantly, the estrogen receptor is the primary target for chemotherapy of breast tumors (15). Therefore, a clear understanding of the function and the regulation of the estrogen receptor is a prerequisite for optimal pharmacotherapy of breast carcinoma. Reports from several groups link calmodulin and the estrogen receptor. For example, binding to calmodulin enhances the affinity of the estrogen receptor for the estrogen response element (13), and calmodulin has a fundamental role in estradiol-regulated gene expression in breast carcinoma cells (21). The concentration of calmodulin in cells is tightly regulated. Overexpression of calmodulin cDNA increases calmodulin mRNA 20-50-fold, whereas calmodulin protein concentrations are only 2-4-fold higher (4, 51). Nevertheless, higher concentrations of calmodulin are present in rapidly growing cells, and increased intracellular concentration of calmodulin have been reported in several malignancies (6-10), including breast carcinoma (9-11). These data, coupled with the findings presented here that calmodulin enhances the stability of the estrogen receptor, suggest that calmodulin may be a component of estrogen-induced cell proliferation. Calmodulin antagonists, which inhibit growth of human breast carcinoma cell lines (52) and augment antiestrogen therapy (53, 54), could be potentially useful in the treatment of breast carcinoma in patients.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. E. Moret and B. Schmid (Novartis, Switzerland) for the gift of CGS9343B, A. Persechini (University of Rochester) and K. Beckingham (Rice University) for the calmodulin cDNA constructs, J. Dedman (University of Cincinnati) for the calmodulin-binding peptide construct, and P. Yen (National Institutes of Health) for estrogen receptor cDNA. We also thank Alvaro E. Rojas and Ann Marie Bynoe for the preparation of the manuscript and Dr. Michael Briggs for help with the figures.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (to D. B. S.) and a Breast Cancer Research Grant from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (to J. L. J.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Current address: Praecis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., One Hampshire St., Cambridge, MA 02139.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Brigham and Women's Hospital, Thorn 530, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115. Tel.: 617-732-6627; Fax: 617-278-6921; E-mail: dsacks@rics.bwh.harvard.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 15, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M010238200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: TFP, trifluoperazine; PVDF, polyvinylidene difluoride; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; CaMDelta Ca, mutant calmodulin incapable of binding Ca2+; hsp, heat shock protein.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Cohen, P., and Klee, C. (1988) Calmodulin , Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., New York
2. Reddy, G. P. V., Reed, W. C., Sheehan, E. L., and Sacks, D. B. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 10426-10430[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Gratzer, W. B., and Baines, A. J. (1988) in Calmodulin (Cohen, P. , and Klee, C. B., eds) , pp. 329-340, Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., New York
4. Rasmussen, C. D., and Means, A. R. (1987) EMBO J. 6, 3961-3968[Abstract]
5. Natsukari, N., Zhang, S. P., Nichols, R. A., and Weiss, B. (1995) Neurochem. Int. 26, 465-476[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Wei, J.-W., Morris, H. P., and Hickie, R. A. (1982) Cancer Res. 42, 2571-2574[Abstract]
7. Liu, G. X., Sheng, H. F., and Wu, S. (1996) Br. J. Cancer 73, 899-901[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Grief, F., Soroff, H. S., Albers, K. M., and Taichman, L. B. (1989) Eur. J. Cancer Clin. Oncol. 25, 19-26[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Singer, A. L., Sherwin, R. P., Dunn, A. S., and Appleman, M. M. (1976) Cancer Res. 36, 60-66[Abstract]
10. Tuccari, G., Rizzo, A., and Barresi, G. (1993) Eur. J. Histochem. 37, 57-64
11. Chun, K. Y., and Sacks, D. B. (2000) in Calcium: The Molecular Basis of Calcium Action in Biology and Medicine (Pochet, R. , Donato, R. , Haiech, J. , Heizmann, C. , and Gerke, V., eds) , pp. 541-563, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
12. Bouhoute, A., and Leclercq, G. (1994) Biochem. Pharmacol. 47, 748-751[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Bouhoute, A., and Leclercq, G. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 208, 748-755[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Walker, R. A., and Varley, J. M. (1993) Cancer Surveys 16, 31-57[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Lykkesfeldt, A. E. (1996) Acta Oncol. (Stockh.) 35 Suppl. 5, 9-14
16. Dickson, R. B., and Lippman, M. E. (1987) Endocrine Rev. 8, 29-43[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Taylor, J. M., and Simpson, R. U. (1992) Cancer Res. 52, 2413-2418[Abstract]
18. Jain, P. T., and Trump, B. F. (1997) Anticancer Res. 17, 1167-1174[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Bellomo, G., Perotti, M., Taddei, F., Mirabelli, F., Finardi, G., Nicotera, P., and Orrenius, S. (1992) Cancer Res. 52, 1342-1346[Abstract]
20. Migliaccio, A., Rotondi, A., and Auricchio, F. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81, 5921-5925[Abstract]
21. Biswas, D. K., Reddy, P. V., Pickard, M., Makkad, B., Pettit, N., and Pardee, A. B. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 33817-33824[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Sacks, D. B., Porter, S. E., Ladenson, J. H., and McDonald, J. M. (1991) Anal. Biochem. 194, 369-377[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Tcholakian, R. K., Jones, G. M., Sanborn, B. M., Rodriguez-Rigau, L. J., and Reimondo, G. G. (1980) Clin. Chem. 26, 101-106[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Pear, W. S., Nolan, G. P., Scott, M. L., and Baltimore, D. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 8392-8396[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Persechini, A., Blumenthal, D. K., Jarrett, H. W., Klee, C. B., Hardy, D. O., and Kretsinger, R. H. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 8052-8058[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Maune, J. F., Klee, C. B., and Beckingham, K. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 5286-5295[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Wang, J., Campos, B., Jamieson, G. A., Kaetzel, M. A., and Dedman, J. R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 30245-30248[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Joyal, J. L., Annan, R. S., Ho, Y. D., Huddleston, M. E., Carr, S. A., Hart, M. J., and Sacks, D. B. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 15419-15425[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Motohashi, N. (1991) Anticancer Res. 11, 1125-1164[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Norman, J. A., Ansell, J., Stone, G. A., Wennogle, L. P., and Wasley, J. W. F. (1987) Mol. Pharmacol. 31, 535-540[Abstract]
31. Burrell, M. M. (1993) Enzymes of Molecular Biology , Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ
32. Kiang, D. T., Kollander, R. E., Thomas, T., and Kennedy, B. J. (1989) Cancer Res. 49, 5312-5316[Abstract]
33. Pink, J. J., and Jordan, V. C. (1996) Cancer Res. 56, 2321-2330[Abstract]
34. Lam, H.-Y. P. (1984) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 118, 27-32[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Gulino, A., Barrera, G., Vacca, A., Farina, A., Ferretti, C., Screpanti, I., Dianzani, M. U., and Frati, L. (1986) Cancer Res. 46, 6274-6278[Abstract]
36. Hardcastle, I. R., Rowlands, M. G., Houghton, J., Parr, I. B., Potter, G. A., and Jarman, M. (1995) J. Med. Chem. 38, 241-248[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. McDonnell, D. P. (2000) J. Soc. Gynecol. Invest. 7, S10-S15[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Shiau, A. K., Barstad, D., Loria, P. M., Cheng, L., Kushner, P. J., Agard, D. A., and Greene, G. L. (1998) Cell 95, 927-937[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Paige, L. A., Christensen, D. J., Gron, H., Norris, J. D., Gottlin, E. B., Padilla, K. M., Chang, C.-Y., Ballas, L. M., Hamilton, P. T., McDonnell, D. P., and Fowlkes, D. M. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 3999-4004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Apodaca, G., Enrich, C., and Mostov, K. E. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 19005-19013[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Taules, M., Rodriguez-Vilarrupla, A., Rius, E., Estanyol, J. M., Casanovas, O., Sacks, D. B., Perez-Paya, E., Bachs, O., and Agell, N. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 24445-24448[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Krishnaraju, K., Murugesan, K., Vij, U., Kapur, B. M. L., and Farooq, A. (1990) Br. J. Cancer 63, 346-347
43. Katzenellenbogen, J. A., O'Malley, B. W., and Katzenellenbogen, B. S. (1996) Mol. Endocrinol. 10, 119-131[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Tsai, M.-J., and O'Malley, B. W. (1994) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 63, 451-486[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Renoir, J. M., Radanyi, C., Faber, L., and Baulieu, E. E. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 10740-10745[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Aumais, J. P., Lee, H. S., Lin, R., and White, J. H. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 12229-12235[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Nishida, E., Koyasu, S., Sakai, H., and Yahara, I. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 16033-16036[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Minami, Y., Kawasaki, H., Suzuki, K., and Yahara, I. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 9604-9610[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Gratton, J.-P., Fontana, J., O'Connor, D. S., Garcia-Cardenas, G., McCabe, T. J., and Sessa, W. C. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 22268-22272[Abstract/Free Full Text]
50. Hulka, B. S., and Stark, A. T. (1995) Lancet 346, 883-887[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Li, Z., Joyal, J. L., and Sacks, D. B. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 5089-5096[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52. Wei, J.-W., Hickie, A., and Klaassen, D. J. (1983) Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 11, 86-90[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Frankfurt, O. S., Sugarbaker, E. V., Robb, J. A., and Villa, L. (1995) Cancer Lett. 97, 149-154[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Newton, C. J., Eycott, K., Green, V., and Atkin, S. L. (2000) J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 73, 29-38[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.