Implication of a Small GTPase Rac1 in the Activation of c-Jun N-terminal Kinase and Heat Shock Factor in Response to Heat Shock*

Song Iy Han, Su Young Oh, Sang Hyeok Woo, Kyung Hee Kim, Jae-Hong KimDagger , Han Do Kim, and Ho Sung Kang§

From the Department of Molecular Biology, College of Natural Sciences, Pusan National University, Pusan 609-735, and the Dagger  Department of Life Science, Kwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Kwangju 506-712, Korea

Received for publication, July 10, 2000, and in revised form, September 5, 2000



    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Heat shock induces c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) activation as well as heat shock protein (HSP) expression through activation of the heat shock factor (HSF), but its signal pathway is not clearly understood. Since a small GTPase Rac1 has been suggested to participate in the cellular response to stresses, we examined whether Rac1 is involved in the heat shock response. Here we show that moderate heat shock (39-41 °C) induces membrane translocation of Rac1 and membrane ruffling in a Rac1-dependent manner. In addition, Rac1N17, a dominant negative mutant of Rac1, significantly inhibited JNK activation by heat shock. Since Rac1V12 was able to activate JNK, it is suggested that heat shock may activate JNK via Rac1. Similar inhibition by Rac1N17 of HSF activation in response to heat shock was observed. However, inhibitory effects of Rac1N17 on heat shock-induced JNK and HSF activation were reduced as the heat shock temperature increased. Rac1N17 also inhibited HSF activation by L-azetidine-2-carboxylic acid, a proline analog, and heavy metals (CdCl2), suggesting that Rac1 may be linked to HSF activation by denaturation of polypeptides in response to various proteotoxic stresses. However, Rac1N17 did not prevent phosphorylation of HSF1 in response to these proteotoxic stresses. Interestingly, a constitutively active mutant Rac1V12 did not activate the HSF. Therefore, Rac1 activation may be necessary, but not sufficient, for heat shock-inducible HSF activation and HSP expression, or otherwise a signal pathway(s) involving Rac1 may be indirectly involved in the HSF activation. In sum, we suggest that Rac1 may play a critical role(s) in several aspects of the heat shock response.



    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Upon exposure to elevated temperatures, cells exhibit a conserved defense mechanism, the heat shock response (also known as the stress response). The cellular response to heat shock involves an elevated expression of highly conserved proteins referred to as the heat shock proteins (HSPs)1. The HSPs are known to function as molecular chaperones during protein folding/assembly and membrane translocation and to prevent aggregation of misfolded polypeptide chains in cells (for reviews, see Refs. 1 and 2). They are also involved in protection against stress-induced apoptosis (3). The HSPs can be induced by other proteotoxic stresses such as L-azetidine-2-carboxylic acid (Azc), a proline analog, and heavy metals (1). Expression of the HSPs is mediated through the activation of the heat shock transcription factor (HSF), which binds to and activates a conserved regulatory site, the heat shock element (HSE), located in the promoters of heat-inducible HSP genes (for review, see Refs. 4 and 5). In vertebrates, HSFs 1-4 have been identified: HSFs 1, 2, and 4 are ubiquitous, whereas HSF3 has been characterized only in avian species (5). Under nonstressful conditions, HSF1 exist as a non-DNA-binding form in complex with other regulatory proteins such as HSP90 an HSP70, which are believed to function as repressors of HSF1 activation in the absence of stress (4-8). It has been suggested that nonnative polypeptides accumulated by heat shock and proteotoxic stresses function as a common proximal inducer of HSF1 activation and HSP expression (1, 9, 10). In stressed cells, misfolded proteins may compete with HSF1 for binding chaperone HSP70, and unbound HSF1 homotrimerizes, becomes transcriptionally competent and is hyperphosphorylated (4, 5, 11). Although protein kinases such as mitogen-activated protein kinase, glycogen synthase kinase 3, and JNK have been demonstrated to down-regulate HSF1 activation in response to heat shock (12, 13), the signal pathway of heat shock activation of HSF1 is as yet unclear. Heat shock also activates JNK, one of mitogen-activated protein kinase family proteins and which is implicated in a variety of cell regulation such as cell growth and apoptosis (14-18). A putative JNK phosphatase has been suggested to be responsible for the heat shock-induced JNK activation (19, 20).

A small GTPase Rac1, a member of Rho GTPase family, has been implicated in the regulation of various fundamental cellular processes, including actin cytoskeletal organization, transcriptional activation, and cell proliferation (for reviews, see Refs. 21-23). Rac1 was originally found to play essential roles in growth factor-induced membrane ruffling and cell proliferation (24-28). It also mediates activation of JNK in response to stresses such as ceramide and Fas (29-31). Therefore, the signal pathway involving Rac1 is likely involved in the stress response. Here we show that a distinct signal pathway(s) involving Rac1 may be implicated in HSF and JNK activation in response to heat shock. We also demonstrate that Rac1 may be linked to HSF activation by denaturation of polypeptides by other proteotoxic stresses such as Azc and heavy metals. However, Rac1N17 did not prevent phosphorylation of HSF1 in response to these proteotoxic stresses. Although moderate heat shock induced membrane translocation and membrane ruffling in a Rac1-dependent manner, a constitutively active Rac1V12 did not activate the HSF, while it stimulated the JNK activity. These results suggest that a signal pathway(s) involving Rac1 may be directly and indirectly linked to heat shock-induced JNK and HSF activation, respectively.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell Culture, Transfection, Western Blotting, and Immunoprecipitation-- Rat-2 fibroblast cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, CRL 1764) and grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies, Inc.) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Life Technologies, Inc.) in a 37 °C humidified incubator with 5% CO2. Rat-2 stable clones expressing a dominant negative Rac1N17 were prepared as described previously (32). pEXV-Myc and pEXV-Myc-Rac1N17 plasmids (gifts from Dr. Alan Hall) were expressed as N-terminally 9E10 epitope-tagged derivatives under SV40 promoter (25). Rat-2 cells were stably cotransfected with pEXV-Rac1N17 or control vector plasmid, pEXV, along with the NeoR gene, and clones were selected and expanded in the presence of G418 (500 µg/ml). For preparation of constitutively active Rac1V12 cells, full-length wild type Rac1 cDNA was cloned into a pcDNA3.1 (Invitrogen), and Gly-to-Val mutagenesis at codon 12 of the Rac1 cDNA was achieved using a mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). pcDNA3.1-Rac1V12 plasmid was expressed under CMV promoter. Rat-2 cells were stably transfected with pcDNA3.1-Rac1V12 or control vector plasmid, pcDNA3.1, and clones were selected and expanded in the presence of G418. Expression of mutant Rac1 proteins was determined by Western blotting with anti-Rac1 antibody (Transduction Laboratories). Metabolic labeling, SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), Western blotting, and immunoprecipitation were carried out as described previously (32, 33).

Electromobility Shift Assay (EMSA) and Supershift Assay (EMSSA)-- Cells (1 × 106 cells) were washed three times with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and the pellet rapidly frozen at -80 °C. After thawing the pellet on ice, it was suspended in buffer A (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 10 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM DTT). The pellet was resuspended in modified buffer A (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 10 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.1% Nonidet P-40). The nuclei were collected by centrifugation at 5,000 rpm for 10 min at 0 °C. The nuclei were gently resuspended in buffer C (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 0.2 mM EDTA, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 25% glycerol, 420 mM NaCl) and incubated for 15 min at 4 °C. The lysates were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, and the supernatants were diluted to modified buffer D (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 50 mM KCl, 20% glycerol, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and stored at -80 °C. Between steps the samples were kept on ice. Double-stranded oligonucleotides containing the HSE consensus sequence (5'-GATCCTCGAATGTTCGCGAAAAG-3') were labeled using Klenow polymerase (Promega) and [alpha -32P]dCTP (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, 3,000 Ci/mmol, 10 mCi/ml). 20 µg of nuclear protein was preincubated for 15 min at 0 °C in 17 µl of binding buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 5% glycerol, 40 mM NaCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.05 mg/ml bovine serum albumin), 1 µg of poly(dI-dC) and protease inhibitors (mixture solution; Sigma). Thereafter, binding reaction was performed for 40 min at room temperature with 200 nCi of radioisotope-labeled oligonucleotide in a final volume of 20 µl. HSF·HSE complexes were resolved by electrophoresis on a 4% acrylamide (acrylamide/bisacrylamide, 29:1) gel at 30 mA for 1 h. Prior to sample loading, the gel was run for 30 min at 20 mA. After electrophoresis, the gel was exposed to an x-ray film for 12-24 h at -80 °C. For EMSSA, nuclear extracts were incubated with anti-HSF1 (SPA-901, StressGen Biotechnologies Corp.) up to 20 min at room temperature prior to the addition of reaction mixture containing the radioisotope-labeled HSE and analyzed by electrophoresis in a similar fashion to EMSA.

JNK Activity Assay-- JNK activity was determined as described in Shin et al. (32). Rat-2 cells were lysed with buffer A (1% Triton X-100, 25 mM Hepes, 50 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaF, 5 mM EDTA, 10 nM okadaic acid, 0.1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and 10 µg/ml leupeptin) and the cell extracts incubated with anti-JNK antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) for 1 h and then protein A-agarose for an additional 1 h. After centrifugation, the precipitates were incubated in the mixture of 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 2 mM sodium orthovanadate, 2 mM DDT, 100 mM MgCl2, [32P]ATP, and 4 µl of glutathione S-transferase-c-Jun at 30 °C for 30 min. To stop the reaction, 4 × Laemmli sample buffer was added to the precipitates and heated at 100 °C for 5 min. After centrifugation, the supernatant was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography.

Confocal Microscopy-- Rat-2 cells were grown on round coverslips in multiwell culture plates and exposed to epidermal growth factor (EGF, 100 ng/ml) and heat shock for 10 min. The cells were fixed with 3.7% (w/v) formaldehyde in PBS for 30 min on ice. The fixed cells were then permeabilized by incubating in 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for 15 min on ice. For actin staining, the cells were incubated with 0.165 M NBD-phallacidin for 30 min at room temperature. The stained cells were washed three times in PBS for 15 min and mounted on slide glasses with gelvitol, which was prepared by mixing 100 ml of 23% polyvinyl alcohol in PBS with 50 ml glycerol. For Rac1 staining, the permeabilized cells were blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin containing several drops of horse serum in TBS for 1 h at room temperature and then incubated with anti-Rac1 antibody (Upstate Biotechnology) overnight at 4 °C. After washing three times with TBS plus 0.1% Triton X-100 (TBST), the cells were stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h and washed five times in TBST and mounted on slide glasses with crystal mount. Then the stained cells were observed under a confocal microscope (LSM510, Carl Zeiss).


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Preparation and Characterization of Rac1N17 and Rac1V12 Cells-- To test the possible involvement of Rac1 in the heat shock response, we prepared and characterized Rat-2 fibroblast cells expressing either a dominant negative Rac1N17 or a constitutively active Rac1V12 (32). Anti-Rac1 antibody was used in Western blotting of cell extracts to detect simultaneously the amounts of mutant and endogenous Rac1. Because of the tag, Rac1 mutants had a slower electrophoretic mobility than endogenous Rac1. The expression levels of mutant Rac1 proteins were similar to that of endogenous Rac1 (Fig. 1A). Expression of Rac1V12 in which amino acid 12 was substituted to Val significantly stimulated the JNK activity, while expression of Rac1N17 in which residue 17 was changed to Asn reduced the JNK activity (Fig. 1A). Similar results have been reported by several investigators in different cell lines (27, 28). Rac1 has been shown to play a role in mitogen signaling; when injected into quiescent cells, Rac1V12 stimulates cell cycle progression through G1 and DNA synthesis, while Rac1N17 blocks serum-induced DNA synthesis (21, 26-28). In agreement with these results, Rac1V12 cells exhibited an increased cell growth, whereas Rac1N17 cells showed a decreased cell proliferation (Fig. 1B). In addition, upon stimulation of cells with EGF, Rac1N17 cells did not show any changes in actin filaments, whereas normal cells exhibited extensive membrane ruffling within 10 min, followed by stress fiber formation (32).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Characterization of Rac1N17 and Rac1V12 cells. A, Rat-2 cells expressing wild type Rac1 (WT), a dominant negative Rac1N17, or a dominant positive mutant Rac1V12 were prepared as described under "Experimental Procedures." Cellular proteins were analyzed either by Western blotting with anti-Rac1 (upper panel) or by JNK activity assay using glutathione S-transferase-c-Jun-(1-79) as a substrate (lower panel). B, Rat-2 wild type (open circles), Rac1N17 (filled circle), and Rac1V12 cells (filled squares) were plated at a density of 5 × 104 cells/ml, and the cell number was counted at 48 and 72 h after plating.

Activation of Rac1 and Induction of Membrane Ruffling by Heat Shock-- To test whether Rac1 is activated by heat shock, we examined its membrane translocation by confocal microscopy using anti-Rac1 antibody. As shown in Fig. 2A, exposure of Rat-2 cells to moderate heat shock (40 °C) induced membrane translocation of Rac1, similar to that in cells treated with EGF. Similar results were obtained in cells exposed to either 39 or 41 °C (data not shown). Since Rac1 mediates growth factor-induced membrane ruffling and lamellipodia (22, 23, 25), we examined alterations in the actin structure in response to heat shock (39-44 °C) by confocal microscopy using NBD-phallacidin, a probe specific for F-actin. As exposed to heat shock for 10 min, membrane ruffling was observed (Fig. 2B). Heat shock-induced ruffling pattern was different depending on the heat shock temperature. Mild heat shock (39-41 °C)-induced ruffling was similar to that observed in growth factor-treated cells (22, 23, 25), whereas severe heat shock (43-44 °C)-induced ruffling was similar to that in cells treated with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, a protein kinase C activator (34). Rac1N17 inhibited membrane ruffling in response to mild, but not to severe, heat shock (Fig. 2B). In addition, protein kinase C inhibitors, H7 and staurosporine, did not exert inhibitory effects on severe heat shock-induced ruffling, indicating that protein kinase C is not likely involved in the severe heat shock-induced actin reorganization (data not shown). These results suggest that mild heat shock-induced actin ruffling may occur via a Rac1 signal pathway, while severe heat shock-induced actin remolding is likely regulated by a Rac1- and protein kinase C-independent mechanism.



View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Activation of Rac1 and induction of ruffling by mild heat shock. A, Rat-2 wild type (WT) and Rac1N17 cells were serum-starved for 24 h and exposed to 100 µg/ml EGF or heat shock (40 °C) for 10 min. The cells were stained with anti-Rac1 antibody (Upstate Biotechnology) and fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibody and observed under a confocal microscope (× 630, Carl Zeiss, LSM510). B, Rat-2 wild type (WT) and Rac1N17 cells were serum-starved for 24 h and exposed to 40 or 43 °C for 10 min. Then the cells were fixed with 3.7% (w/v) formaldehyde. The fixed cells were permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 and stained with 0.165 M NBD-phallacidin. The cells were observed with a confocal microscope (× 630, Carl Zeiss, LSM510).

Inhibition by Rac1N17 of Heat Shock-induced JNK Activation-- It was examined whether Rac1 participates in heat shock-induced JNK activation. Heat shock activated JNK in time- and temperature-dependent manners (Fig. 3) (18). Rac1N17 completely inhibited moderate (39-41 °C) heat shock-induced JNK activation, but it partially inhibited severe (43 °C) heat shock-induced JNK activation. Thus, a distinct signal pathway involving Rac1 may mediate JNK activation by mild heat shock, whereas a Rac1-independent pathway as well as Rac1 signal pathway may be responsible for JNK activation by severe heat shock.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Inhibition by Rac1N17 of heat shock-induced JNK activation. Rat-2 wild type (WT) and Rac1N17 cells were exposed to heat shock of 39, 41, and 43 °C for the times indicated. 200 µg of the protein extracts were immunoprecipitated with anti-JNK antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) and subjected to JNK activity assay with glutathione S-transferase-c-Jun-(1-79) as a substrate (A). Phosphorylation was quantified by densitometric scanning (B). The kinase activity of wild type (black bars) and Rac1N17 cells (gray bars) is expressed as the value relative to that for the untreated wild type cells.

Suppression of Heat Shock-induced HSP Expression and HSF1 Activation by Rac1N17-- We also investigated whether Rac1 is involved in heat shock-induced HSF activation. Heat shock highly enhanced the synthesis of HSP70 and HSP90 as described previously (1), and Rac1N17 significantly prevented the heat shock-induced HSP expression, while unaffecting synthesis of other proteins (Fig. 4). As shown in Fig. 5A and demonstrated by others (4-6), HSF1 was involved in the heat shock-induced HSP expression. Rac1N17 significantly inhibited heat shock-induced HSF1 activation (Fig. 5B), without affecting the level of HSF1 (Fig. 5C). However, as the heat shock temperature was elevated or heat shock was imposed for prolonged period, an inhibitory effect of Rac1N17 was diminished (Figs. 4 and 5B). These results suggest that Rac1 may be required in heat shock-induced HSP expression and HSF1 activation, although the Rac1-independent mechanism also participates in severe heat shock response.



View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Suppression by Rac1N17 of heat shock-induced HSP expression. Rat-2 wild type (WT) and Rac1N17 cells were exposed to either different heat shock temperatures (39, 41, and 43 °C) for 10 and 20 min (A and B) or 42 °C for the times indicated (C). The cells were labeled with [35S]methionine for 4 h at 37 °C during recovery period, and the cell lysates were then analyzed by SDS-PAGE and fluorography (A) or by immunoprecipitation with monoclonal anti-HSP72 antibody (SPA-810, StressGen Biotechnologies Corp.) (B and C).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Inhibition by Rac1N17 of heat shock-induced HSF1 activation. A, Rat-2 wild type cells were exposed to 42 °C for 20 min. Twenty µg of nuclear proteins were preincubated in the absence or presence of anti-HSF1 antibody and incubated with 32P-labeled HSE consensus sequence (5'-GATCCTCGAATGTTCGCGAAAAG-3') in a DNA binding buffer. After separation on a 4% polyacrylamide gel, DNA-protein complexes were visualized by autoradiography. B, Rat-2 wild type (WT) and Rac1N17 cells were exposed to either 42 °C for the times indicated or exposed to various temperatures for 20 min. Twenty µg of nuclear proteins were then incubated with 32P-labeled HSE and analyzed by EMSA. Binding reaction was also done with nuclear extracts from wild type cells exposed to 45 °C heat shock in the presence of 100-fold excess of competitor DNA (×100 HSE). C, wild type (WT) and Rac1N17 Rat cells were cultured at normal growth condition and the cellular proteins analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting with anti-HSF1 (Neo markers).

Inhibition by Rac1N17 of HSF Activation in Response to L-Azetidine-2-Carboxylic Acid and Heavy Metals-- It has been suggested that mild heat shock induces denaturation of only nascent polypeptides, while severe heat shock causes misfolding of both cellular proteins and nascent polypeptides (35, 36). Therefore, it is possible that Rac1 may be linked to HSF1 activation by denaturation of nascent polypeptides. First, we tried to confirm whether HSF1 activation in response to mild heat shock response is linked with the regulation of protein synthesis. As demonstrated by others (35, 36), preincubation with cycloheximide, an inhibitor of protein synthesis, significantly blocked HSF1 activation in response to moderate heat shock of 39-41 °C, but not to severe heat shock of 43-45 °C (Fig. 6A). We also examined the effects of cycloheximide on HSF1 activation in response to Azc, which causes denaturation of only nascent polypeptides. As shown in Fig. 6A, Azc-induced HSF1 activation was significantly inhibited by cycloheximide. With other's previous results (35, 36), these results support that mild heat shock only affects the proteins being newly synthesized, whereas severe heat shock causes misfolding of nascent polypeptides as well as proteins preexisting in cells.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Implication of Rac1 in HSF activation in response to proteotoxic stresses. A, Rat-2 wild type cells were incubated in the presence or absence of 60 µg/ml cycloheximide (CHX) for 2 h and then exposed to either heat shock of 39-45 °C for 20 min or 5 mM Azc for 6 h, and the nuclear extracts were analyzed by EMSA. DNA-protein complexes (arrowhead) were visualized by autoradiography. B, suppression of L-azetidine-2-carboxylic acid and heavy metal-induced HSF activation by Rac1N17. Rat-2 wild type (WT) and Rac1N17 cells were treated with either 5 mM Azc for 6 h or 200 µM CdCl2 (Cd) for 4 h. The nuclear extracts were incubated with anti-HSF1 antibody and then analyzed by electromobility shift assay. Binding reaction was also done with nuclear extracts from Rat cells exposed to 5 mM Azc in the presence of 100-fold excess of competitor DNA (×100 HSE).

It was then examined whether Rac1 is involved in HSF activation by denaturation of nascent polypeptides. Azc-induced HSF1 activation was prevented by Rac1N17 (Fig. 6B). However, Rac1N17 also prevented HSF (possibly HSF1) activation by CdCl2 (Fig. 6B), which is thought to cause denaturation of both nascent polypeptides and proteins preexisting in cells. Furthermore, Rac1N17 also prevented HSF1 activation in response to heat shock of 43 °C, at which cycloheximide did not exert an inhibitory effect on HSF1 activation (Fig. 5B, lower panel). Taking these results together, we suggest that Rac1 may be linked to activation of HSF1 by denaturation of cellular polypeptides in response to a variety of proteotoxic stresses, including heat shock, amino acid analogs, and heavy metals.

Heat Shock-induced HSF1 Phosphorylation Is Not Prevented by Rac1N17-- HSF1 has been known to be hyperphosphorylated upon exposure to proteotoxic stresses such as heat shock and heavy metals (4, 5, 11). Therefore, the effects of Rac1N17 on heat shock-induced HSF phosphorylation were also examined. As shown in Fig. 7, HSF1 was hyperphosphorylated in cells exposed to severe heat shock (43-45 °C) and cadmium chloride, while its phosphorylation slightly increased in cells treated with mild heat shock (39-41 °C) and Azc. Rac1N17 did not prevent HSF1 phosphorylation in response to these proteotoxic stresses, indicating that HSF1 phosphorylation is not likely linked to the Rac1 signal pathway.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Rac1N17 does not inhibit heat shock-induced phosphorylation of HSF1. Wild type (WT) and Rac1N17 cells were exposed to heat shock for 20 min, 5 mM Azc for 6 h, or 200 µM Cd for 4 h. The protein extracts were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting with anti-HSF1 antibody (Neo markers).

Rac1V12 Does Not Activate HSP Expression and HSF Activation-- Finally, we examined whether heat shock-induced Rac1 activation is sufficient for HSP synthesis and HSF activation. In constitutively active Rac1V12 cells, however, no significant induction of HSP synthesis and HSF activation was observed (Fig. 8). These results suggest that heat shock-induced Rac1 activation may be necessary, but not sufficient, for heat shock-induced HSP expression and HSF activation, or otherwise a signal pathway(s) involving Rac1 may be indirectly linked to the HSF activation.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Rac1V12 does not stimulate HSP expression and HSF activation. A, Rat-2 wild type (WT), Rac1N17, and Rac1V12 cells were exposed to heat shock of 43 °C for 20 min and labeled with [35S]methionine at 37 °C for 4 h. The cellular proteins were immunoprecipitated with anti-HSP72, and the immunoprecipitates were then analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. B, Rat-2 wild type (WT) and Rac1V12 cells were exposed to 5 mM Azc for 6 h and heat shock of 43 °C for 20 min, and the nuclear extracts were analyzed by EMSA.



    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

A small GTPase Rac1, one of the Rho family GTPases, has been implicated in a variety of cell regulation, including actin remodeling, gene transcription, and cell proliferation (21-28). In fact, a constitutively active mutant Rac1V12 stimulated cell proliferation, whereas a dominant negative mutant Rac1N17 repressed cell growth (Fig. 1B). Rac1 has also been shown to participate in the cellular response to stresses (16, 17, 30, 31). For example, upon exposure to ceramide and Fas, cells induce apoptosis through activating the Rac1-JNK signal pathway (29). In this study, we examined whether Rac1 is implicated in the heat shock response. We show that mild heat shock (39-41 °C) induced membrane translocation and possibly activation of Rac1 (Fig. 2A). In addition, mild heat shock (39-42 °C) also induced membrane ruffling in a Rac1-dependent manner (Fig. 2B), similar to that observed in growth factor-treated cells (22, 23, 25). These results suggest that mild heat shock can activate Rac1. It has been demonstrated that PI 3-kinase and PAK, signal molecules that are involved in the Rac1 signal pathway, are activated by heat shock (37, 38), further supporting heat shock activation of Rac1. However, it is not clear how heat shock activates Rac1. Heat shock is known to increase membrane fluidity and to alter the composition of cell membrane (39-41), which may in turn lead to the activation of various membrane proteins, including receptor tyrosine kinases. In fact, heat shock was shown to activate EGF receptor tyrosine kinase in NIH-3T3 cells (37). These results allow us to speculate that multiple receptor tyrosine kinases, including EGF receptor, can be activated by heat shock, as shown by other stresses such as UV irradiation and osmotic shock (42), and their activation may result in the activation of Rac1.

Rac1N17 significantly prevented JNK activation in response to heat shock, although the inhibitory effect of Rac1N17 was reduced as the heat shock temperature increased (Fig. 3A). Since heat shock activates Rac1 (Fig. 2A), and a dominant positive mutant Rac1V12 induces the activation of JNK (Fig. 1 A), mild heat shock-induced JNK activation is likely regulated via Rac1 (Fig. 9). A number of signal pathways have been reported that mediate JNK activation in response to external stimuli. It has been well demonstrated by several investigators that JNK activation by growth factors, inflammatory cytokines, and stressful agents such as ceramide is mediated through Rac1 (21, 26-28). In contrast, protein-damaging stresses such as sodium arsenite, oxidative stress, and ethanol have been shown to induce JNK activation primarily through inhibiting a putative JNK phosphatase (19, 20, 43). For example, the reactive oxygen species (ROS) is able to directly inhibit JNK phosphatase by oxidizing the SH group of the protein (19, 20). Similar to other proteotoxic stresses, heat shock has been suggested to activate JNK through inhibiting a JNK phosphatase (19, 20). Since heat shock can produce ROS (44), and the heat shock response such as HSP expression is prevented by pretreatment of anti-oxidants (45), ROS may serve as a mediator of the heat shock response. Furthermore, unlike other Rho family GTPases, Rac1 is able to produce ROS through activating NADPH oxidase (21, 46). Therefore, we examined in this study whether ROS is involved in heat shock-induced JNK activation. However, pretreatment of antioxidants such as ascorbic acid, butylated hydroxytoluene, and n-propylgallate did not prevent JNK activation by heat shock (data not shown). Thus, although Rac1 could produce ROS through activating NADPH oxidase (46), heat shock-induced JNK activation is likely regulated by the Rac1 signal pathway not involving ROS and NADPH oxidase. PAK, one of Rac1 downstream effectors and which is upstream of JNK, has been reported to be activated by heat shock (38). Therefore, the Rac1-PAK signal pathway may be responsible for heat shock-induced JNK activation. Alternatively, MKK7, which can be activated by stresses and is upstream of JNK (47), may be responsible for the heat shock-induced JNK activation (Fig. 9).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Roles of the Rac1 signal pathway in the heat shock response. Each solid line and arrow represents a step in an activating pathway. The T-shaped line represents inactivation or inhibition.

We also show that HSF activation in response to heat shock is significantly prevented by Rac1N17, although the inhibitory effect of Rac1N17 on HSF activation is diminished in severe heat shock-treated cells (Figs. 4 and 5). These results suggest that a specific signal pathway involving Rac1 is likely linked to heat shock-induced HSF activation and HSP expression, while a Rac1-independent mechanism is also involved in the severe heat shock response. Rac1N17 also prevented HSF activation by L-azetidine-2-carboxylic acid, a proline analog, and heavy metals (CdCl2) (Fig. 6), indicating that Rac1 may be implicated in HSF activation by denaturation of polypeptides in response to proteotoxic stresses. In agreement with these findings, it has been demonstrated that mechanical stress-induced HSF activation and HSP expression in vascular smooth muscle cells are prevented by Rac1N17 (48). In addition, Ozaki et al. (2000) has recently shown that Rac1N17 prevents HSF1 activation and HSP expression in response to hypoxia/reoxygenation and sodium arsenite (49). They have also shown that ROS is involved in HSF activation in response to hypoxia/reoxygenation and sodium arsenite. However, we could not find any involvement of ROS in heat shock-induced HSF activation, since several different antioxidants such as ascorbic acid, butylated hydroxytoluene, n-propylgallate, diphenyleneiodonium, and pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate did not exert inhibitory effects on heat shock-induced HSF activation and HSP expression (data not shown). Therefore we suggest that although ROS may participate in HSF activation by hypoxia/reoxygenation and sodium arsenite, it is unlikely to be involved in heat shock-induced HSF activation and HSP expression.

Since Rac1N17 prevents HSF activation and HSP expression in response to a variety of stresses, it can be proposed that the Rac1 signal pathway may be directly linked to the activation of HSF. However, we show that a constitutively active Rac1V12 cannot induce HSF activation and HSP expression in the absence of stress (Fig. 8). A similar result was obtained in HepG2 cells transfected with Rac1V12 (49). Therefore, although heat shock activates Rac1, Rac1 activation may not be directly linked to HSF activation and HSP expression. Even though we do not know how Rac1 is involved in the heat shock response, we postulated two possibilities as follows. One is that besides activating Rac1, heat shock may activate other factor(s), which in combination with Rac1 regulate the heat shock-induced HSF activation. Another possibility is that a signal pathway(s) involving Rac1 may be indirectly linked to heat shock-induced HSF activation. Nonnative polypeptide chains appeared to be a common proximal inducer of HSF1 activation and HSP gene expression in the stressed cells (1, 9, 10). Heat shock and proteotoxic stresses trigger the rapid conversion of HSF1 from inert monomer to homotrimer, resulting in nuclear translocation and increased HSE binding affinity and hyperphosphorylation (4, 5, 11). Rac1N17 did not exert inhibitory effects on hyperphosphoryation in response to proteotoxic stresses such as heat shock and cadmium chloride, suggesting that the Rac signal pathway may be not linked to HSF1 phosphorylation (Fig. 7). Therefore, the signal pathway involving Rac1 may play a critical role(s) in the conversion of HSF from an inactive monomer to the transcriptionally competent form, such as trimer formation, nuclear translocation (Fig. 9).

In this study, we show that Rac1 may play a critical role(s) in several aspects of the heat shock response, i.e. HSP expression and HSF activation, JNK activation, and actin reorganization. Inhibitory effects of Rac1N17 on the heat shock response were more prominent in cells experiencing mild heat shock than those exposed to severe heat shock. It is difficult to define the terms "mild" and "severe," because the effects of heat shock are determined by both heat shock temperature and exposure time. As temperature increases by 1 °C, the time required for the same extent of the heat shock response is reduced by 2-fold (50). Thus, a severe heat shock response can be obtained by increasing either heat shock temperature or exposure time. Mild heat shock has been suggested to confer cells with a capacity to survive against harsh heat shock or other harmful stresses (1), but the molecular mechanism underlying this event is not still clear. Mild heat shock can be seen in the regulation of body temperature in mammals, including human, whose body temperature is finely regulated in a homeostatic manner. Although a human gets a fever, body temperature increases only by 1-2 °C. In such a case, fever can be considered as mild heat shock. Therefore, Rac1-dependent signal pathway may play an important role(s) in the physiological heat shock response such as fever. Rac1 has been implicated in a variety of cellular functions, including growth factor-induced actin reorganization and cell proliferation, apoptosis, gene expression, and survival (21-23). Thus, fever may function as an important signal, which is required for resetting our body conditions, rather than acting as a proteotoxic stress. Further studies on functions of Rac1 in the mild heat shock response may provide a new insight into the elucidation of roles of heat shock in organism.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank D. Y. Moon, J. H. Chung, and H. S. Kim for review of this manuscript and K. J. Lee for critical comments.


    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Basic Science Research Institute Program BSRI-1998-15-D00248, Ministry of Education and Grant 96-0401-16-01-3 from the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation, Korea.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular Biology, College of Natural Sciences, Pusan National University, Pusan 609-735, Korea. Tel.: 82-51-510-2275; Fax: 82-51-513-9258; E-mail: hspkang@hyowon.cc.pusan.ac.kr.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 24, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M006042200


    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: HSP, heat shock protein; HSF, heat shock factor; HSE, heat shock element; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; ROS, reactive oxygen species; EMSA, electromobility shift assay; EMSSA, electromobility supershift assay; Azc, L-azetidine-2-carboxylic acid; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; DTT, dithiothreitol; EGF, epidermal growth factor; NBD, 12-(N-methyl-N-(7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl; TBS, Tris-buffered saline.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES


1. Welch, W. J., Kang, H. S., Beckmann, R. P., and Mizzen, L. A. (1991) Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 167, 31-55[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Herrmann, J. M., and Neupert, W. (2000) Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 3, 210-214[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Mosser, D. D., Carone, A. W., Bourget, L., Denis-Larose, C., and Massie, B. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 5317-5327[Abstract]
4. Wu, C. (1995) Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 11, 441-469[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Morimoto, R. I. (1998) Genes Dev. 12, 3788-3796[Free Full Text]
6. Abravaya, K., Myers, M. P., Murphy, S. P., and Morimoto, R. I. (1992) Genes Dev. 7, 1153-1164
7. Zou, J., Guo, Y., Guettouche, T., Smith, D. F., and Voellmy, R. (1998) Cell 94, 471-480[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Ali, A., Bharadwaj, S., O'Carroll, R., and Ovsenek, N. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 4949-4960[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Ananthan, J., Goldberg, A. L., and Voellmy, R. (1986) Science 232, 522-524
10. Dubois, M. F., Hoanessian, A. G., and Bersaude, O. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 9707-9711[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Baler, R., Dahl, G., and Voellmy, R. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 2486-2496[Abstract]
12. Chu, B., Soncin, F., Price, B. D., Stevenson, M. A., and Calderwood, S. K. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 30847-30857[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Dai, R., Frejtag, W., He, B., Zhang, Y., and Mivechi, N. F. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 18210-18218[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Kyriakis, J. M., Banerjee, P., Nikolakaki, E., Dai, T., Rubie, E. A., Ahmad, M. F., Avruch, J., and Woodgett, J. R. (1994) Nature 369, 156-160[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Kyriakis, J. M., and Avruch, J. (1996) Bioessays 18, 567-577[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Xia, Z., Dickens, M., Raingeaud, J., Davis, R. J., and Greenberg, M. E. (1995) Science 270, 1326-1331[Abstract]
17. Verheij, M., Bose, R., Lin, X. H., Yao, B., Jarvis, W. D., Grant, S., Birrer, M. J., Szabo, E., Zon, L. I., Kyriakis, J. M., Haimovitz-Friedman, A., Fuks, Z., and Kolesnick, R. N. (1996) Nature 380, 75-79[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Adler, V., Schaffer, A., Kim, J., Dolan, L., and Ronai, Z. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 26071-26077[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Meriin, A. B., Yaglom, J. A., Gabai, V. L., Zon, L., Ganiatsas, S., Mosser, D. D., Zon, L., and Sherman, M. Y. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 2547-2555
20. Nguyen, A. N., and Shiozaki, K. (1999) Genes Dev. 13, 1653-1663[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Van Aelst, L., and Dsouza-Achorey, C. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 2295-2322[Free Full Text]
22. Tapon, N., and Hall, A. (1997) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 86-92[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Hall, A. (1998) Science 279, 509-514[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Ridley, A. J., and Hall, A. (1992) Cell 70, 389-399[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Ridley, A. J., Paterson, H. F., Johnston, C. L., Diekmann, D., and Hall, A. (1992) Cell 70, 401-410[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Olson, M. F., Ashworth, A., and Hall, A. (1995) Science 269, 1270-1272
27. Lamarche, N., Tapon, N., Stowers, L., Burbelo, P. D., Aspenström, P., Bridges, T., Chant, J., and Hall, A. (1996) Cell 87, 519-529[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Joneson, T., McDonough, M., Bar-Sagi, D., and Van Aelst, L. (1996) Science 274, 1374-1376[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Brenner, B., Koppernhoefer, U., Weinstock, C., Linderkamp, O., Lang, F., and Gulbins, E. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 22173-22181[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Coso, O. A., Chiariello, M., Yu, Y., Teramoto, H., Crespo, P., Xu, N., Miki, T., and Gutkind, J. S. (1995) Cell 81, 1137-1146[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Minden, A., Lin, A., Claret, F. X., Abo, A., and Karin, M. (1995) Cell 81, 1147-1157[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Shin, E. A., Kim, K. H., Han, S. I., Ha, K. S., Kim, J. H., Kang, K. I., Kim, H. D., and Kang, H. S. (1999) FEBS Lett. 452, 355-359[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Kim, H. R., Kang, H. S., and Kim, H. D. (1999) IUBMB Life 48, 429-433[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Myat, M. M., Anderson, S., Allen, L. A., and Aderem, A. (1997) Curr. Biol. 7, 611-614[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Baler, R., Welch, W. J., and Voellmy, R. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 117, 1151-1159[Abstract]
36. Tanabe, M., Nakai, A., Kawazoe, Y., and Nagata, K. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 15389-15395[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Lin, R. Z., Hu, Z. W., Chin, J. H., and Hoffman, B. B. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 31196-31202[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Maroni, P., Bendinelli, P., Zuccorononno, C., Schiaffonati, L., and Piccoletti, R. (1999) Cell Biol. Int. 24, 145-152[CrossRef]
39. Vigh, L., Maresca, B., and Harwood, J. L. (1998) Trends Biochem. Sci. 23, 369-374[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Anderson, R. L., and Parker, R. (1982) Int. J. Radiat. Biol. Relat. Stud. Phys. Chem. Med. 42, 57-69[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Murakami-Murofushi, K., Nishikawa, K., Hirakawa, E., and Murofushi, H. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 486-489[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Rosette, C., and Karin, M. (1996) Science 274, 1194-1197[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Kamata, H., and Hirata, H. (1999) Cell Signal. 11, 1-14[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Davison, J. F., Whyte, B., Bissinger, P. H., and Schiestl, R. H. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 5116-5121[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Gorman, A. M., Heavey, B., Creagh, E., Cotter, T. G., and Samali, A. (1999) FEBS Lett. 445, 98-102[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Mizuno, T., Kaibuchi, K., Ando, S., Musha, T., Hiraoka, K., Takaishi, K., Asada, M., Nunoi, H., Matsuda, I., and Takai, Y. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 10215-10218[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Moriguchi, T., Toyoshima, F., Masuyama, N., Hanafusa, H., Gotoh, Y., and Nishida, E. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 7045-7053[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Xu, Q., Schett, G., Li, C., Hu, Y., and Wick, G.,. (2000) Circ. Res. 86, 1122-1128[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Ozaki, M., Deshpande, S. S., Angkeow, P., Suzuki, S., and Irani, K.,. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 35377-35383[Abstract/Free Full Text]
50. Dewey, W. C. (1989) Radiat. Res. 120, 191-204[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.