Desensitization of the Luteinizing Hormone/Choriogonadotropin Receptor in Ovarian Follicular Membranes Is Inhibited by Catalytically Inactive ARNO+*

Sutapa MukherjeeDagger , James E. Casanova§, and Mary Hunzicker-DunnDagger

From the Dagger  Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 60611 and the § Department of Cell Biology, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908

Received for publication, October 12, 2000



    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We have investigated the participation of endogenous ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF) nucleotide-binding site opener (ARNO) in desensitization of the luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin (LH/CG) receptor, independent of receptor internalization, using a cell-free plasma membrane model. We recently showed that the addition of recombinant ARNO promotes binding of beta -arrestin1 to the third intracellular (3i) loop of the active LH/CG receptor, thereby reducing the ability of the receptor to activate the stimulatory G protein and signal to adenylyl cyclase. In the present report we determined whether ARNO is detectable in follicular membranes and whether the catalytically inactive E156K ARNO mutant, containing a mutation in the Sec7 domain, can act in a dominant negative manner to block LH/CG receptor desensitization. Results show that ARNO is readily detected in follicular membranes and that levels of membrane-associated ARNO increase with follicular maturation. The addition of catalytically inactive E156K ARNO blocks both the release of beta -arrestin1 from its membrane docking site, based on Western blot analysis, and development of LH/CG receptor desensitization. We also investigated whether a point mutation in the pleckstrin homology (PH) domain of ARNO (R280D), which blocks binding of phosphoinositides like phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) but not catalytic activity, disrupts LH/CG receptor desensitization. R280D ARNO neither promotes nor inhibits LH/CG receptor desensitization, consistent with a requirement of the PH domain of ARNO for its association with the plasma membrane. LH/CG receptor activation of ARNO is not mediated by activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase) or by G protein beta gamma subunits. Taken together, these results suggest that LH/CG receptor promotes beta -arrestin1 release from its membrane docking site to bind to the 3i loop of the LH/CG receptor via activation of membrane delimited endogenous ARNO. As ARNO activation is independent of PI 3-kinase and Gbeta gamma , our results are consistent with a role for PIP2 in receptor-stimulated ARNO activation.



    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The binding of saturating concentrations of agonist to guanine nucleotide-binding (G) protein-coupled receptors initially results in productive coupling to an effector, resulting in increased effector activity. Thereafter, effector activity often declines or becomes desensitized as a result of the uncoupling of the agonist-bound receptor from its cognate G protein (1). We have used a cell-free plasma membrane model to investigate the cellular mechanism of homologous luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin (LH/CG)1 receptor desensitization independent of LH/CG receptor internalization (2, 3).

We have recently shown that desensitization of the LH/CG receptor requires the binding of membrane-delimited beta -arrestin1 (Arrestin 2) to the third intracellular loop (3i) of the LH/CG receptor, resulting in reduced cAMP production (4, 5). This conclusion is based on evidence that preincubation of membranes with neutralizing anti-arrestin antibodies prevents development of LH/CG receptor desensitization (5), that beta -arrestin1 binds directly and selectively to a synthetic peptide corresponding to the 3i loop of the LH/CG receptor (4), and that preincubation of membranes with a synthetic peptide corresponding to the 3i loop of the LH/CG receptor completely blocks development of receptor desensitization (4). We have also recently shown that LH/CG receptor activation not only exposes a binding site for beta -arrestin1 at the 3i loop on the receptor but also leads to the apparent activation of the small G protein ADP-ribosylation factor 6 (ARF6), resulting in the release of a pool of beta -arrestin1 from its membrane docking site (6). These conclusions are based on the following results. (a) ARNO (25 nM), a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for ARFs 1 and 6 (7, 8), promotes desensitization of the LH/CG receptor in the presence but not the absence of GTP concomitant with the release of beta -arrestin1 from its membrane docking site (6). (b) Catalytically dead E156K ARNO mutant (at 25 or 50 nM) does not cause LH/CG receptor desensitization (6). (c) Preincubation of membranes with synthetic N-terminal ARF6 peptide, but not with the corresponding ARF1 peptide, prevents the release of beta -arrestin1 from its membrane docking site and thereby prevents development of LH/CG receptor desensitization (6). LH/CG receptor-dependent activation of the small G protein ARF6 is consistent with earlier studies showing that LH/CG receptor desensitization exhibits an obligatory requirement for GTP (3, 9-11).

Based on our evidence that the addition of exogenous ARNO in the presence of 1 µM GTP frees a pool of beta -arrestin1 to bind to the 3i loop of the activated LH/CG receptor to block receptor interaction with Gs (6), we hypothesized that LH/CG receptor-dependent activation of ARF6 might be mediated by activation of endogenous, membrane-delimited ARNO. In the present report we therefore sought to determine whether endogenous membrane-delimited ARNO participates in LH/CG receptor desensitization.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

All chemicals were from previously described sources (4, 5). Recombinant ARNO and E156K ARNO were expressed and purified as described previously (7). A sucrose gradient-purified membrane fraction enriched in adenylyl cyclase (AC) activity was isolated from preovulatory-size porcine ovarian follicles and stored at -70 °C (6). The two-stage desensitization reaction (4) is summarized in the Fig. 2 legend. Supernatant and pellet fractions of porcine ovarian follicles were obtained by homogenizing tissue in 10 mM TRIS-HCl, pH 7.0, 1.0 mM EDTA with a glass-glass Dounce homogenizer (~10 strokes) followed by centrifugation at 1,000 × g for 5 min and then at 10,000 × g for 30 min. The final pellet was resuspended in 1 volume of the original homogenate, and an aliquot of the final supernatant and pellet fractions was obtained for protein determination. SDS-STOP was then added, and samples were boiled for 10 min and stored at -70 °C. Western blotting with anti-beta -arrestin antibody (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY), the pan-arrestin antibody F4C1, and affinity-purified anti-ARNO antibody (7) was performed as described previously (6, 7). The results were analyzed using Student's t test (p < 0.05) (12).


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We first determined whether ARNO is detectable in follicular membranes enriched in AC activity. Results (Fig. 1A, lane 4) show that a band reactive with affinity purified anti-ARNO antibody (7) is readily detectable in porcine ovarian follicular membranes and migrates on SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis somewhat faster than His6-tagged recombinant human ARNO (lanes 5-8). Quantitation of the amount of ARNO in partially purified ovarian follicular membranes by Western blotting, using the signal generated by recombinant ARNO as the standard, yielded a concentration of ~1.5 µg of ARNO protein (or 32 nmol)/mg of membrane protein. The basis for the ARNO doublet (see Fig. 1A, lanes 1-3) is not known but might correspond to phosphorylated and unphosphorylated ARNO (13, 14). We additionally determined whether the amount of ARNO present in unpurified 10,000 × g membrane and supernatant fractions is regulated by follicular maturation. Results (Fig. 1B) show that whereas ARNO levels are relatively low and unregulated in the supernatant fractions of small (1-2 mm) compared with large (8-10 mm) follicles, the levels of ARNO in the membrane fraction are higher (~6-fold) in large preovulatory follicles enriched in LH/CG receptors compared with levels in small immature follicles that do not contain LH/CG receptors (15). These results show that the expression of ARNO is increased with development of porcine follicles from an immature to a preovulatory phenotype and that the majority of ARNO is localized to the pellet fraction.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   ARNO is detectable by Western blot in porcine ovarian follicular membranes and increases with follicular maturation. A, indicated amounts of recombinant His6-tagged human ARNO and porcine ovarian follicular membrane proteins were loaded onto an SDS-acrylamide gel. The resulting blot was probed with affinity-purified anti-ARNO antibody. B, proteins (~75 µg) in 10,000 × g supernatant and pellet fractions of porcine ovarian follicles measuring 1-2 mm (small) or 8-10 mm (large, preovulatory) were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed with affinity-purified anti-ARNO antibody. The results are representative of two separate experiments.

Based on evidence that ARNO is readily detected in membranes of preovulatory-size follicles, we next sought to determine whether catalytically inactive ARNO could compete with endogenous ARNO to block agonist-dependent LH/CG receptor desensitization. The E156K mutation in the Sec7 domain of ARNO blocks the ability of ARNO to promote GTP exchange at ARF6 but does not disrupt its ability to bind phosphoinositides via its pleckstrin homology (PH) domain (14). Although preincubation of membranes with 50 (not shown) or 100 nM (Fig. 2A) E156K ARNO did not affect the extent of LH/CG receptor desensitization (hCG/hCG conditions), preincubation of membranes with 200 nM E156K ARNO significantly reduced (p < 0.05) the extent of LH/CG receptor desensitization. Thus, when membranes were preincubated with 200 (Fig. 2A), 300, or 400 (not shown) nM E156K ARNO, hCG-stimulated AC activity measured with hCG in stage 1 (i.e. desensitization conditions) was no longer significantly different from values measured with BSA in stage 1. The capability of E156K ARNO to block LH/CG receptor desensitization was lost when E156K ARNO was boiled (Fig. 2B). The addition of E156K ARNO directly to the 5-min AC assay did not affect basal or hCG-, forskolin-, or aluminum fluoride-stimulated AC activities (Fig. 2C). This result shows that E156K ARNO does not have a nonspecific effect on AC activity or on the ability of the LH/CG receptor or Gs to activate AC. To ascertain whether E156K ARNO indeed blocks development of LH/CG receptor desensitization by preventing ARF6 activation, we determined whether E156K ARNO blocks the release of beta -arrestin1 from its membrane docking site. In the absence of LH/CG receptor activation, beta -arrestin1 was readily detectable in follicular membranes (Fig. 2D, lane 4), presumably bound at a docking site distinct from the LH/CG receptor (6). Incubation of membranes with hCG resulted in the retention of a fraction of beta -arrestin1 at the membrane (Fig. 2D, lane 3). This fraction of beta -arrestin1 was competed away with a synthetic peptide corresponding to the 3i loop of the LH/CG receptor (lane 2), consistent with the premise that LH/CG receptor activation results in the binding of a fraction of beta -arrestin1 to the 3i loop of the activated LH/CG receptor (4, 6). However, when E156K ARNO was included in the membrane incubation mix with hCG and 3i peptide, this fraction of beta -arrestin1 was retained in the membrane (lane 1), presumably at its membrane docking site as it was no longer competed away by the 3i peptide. These results suggested that exogenous catalytically dead E156K ARNO effectively competes with endogenous ARNO to block the ability of the activated LH/CG receptor to promote beta -arrestin1 release and consequent LH/CG receptor desensitization. Based on these results we can therefore conclude that endogenous ARNO is activated to promote GTP exchange at ARF6 in response to LH/CG receptor activation.



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Catalytically dead ARNO blocks LH/CG receptor desensitization. A, preincubation of membranes with 200 nM E156K ARNO prevented the decline in hCG-stimulated AC activity when membranes were incubated with hCG in stage 1 of the desensitization incubation, resulting in a reduction in the extent of LH/CG receptor desensitization. Membranes were preincubated in the presence of E156K ARNO or water, as indicated, at 4 °C for 30 min. Following preincubation, the two-stage desensitization incubation was conducted, consisting of a 40-min stage 1 reaction under conditions that promote development of desensitization of hCG-stimulated AC activity (+ hCG) or do not promote desensitization (+ BSA) followed by a 5-min AC assay (± hCG; stage 2) (4). The presence of BSA in stages 1 and 2 measured basal AC activity; BSA in stage 1 and hCG in stage 2 measured full hCG-stimulated AC activity; hCG in stages 1 and 2 measured hCG-induced desensitization of AC activity. The percent reduction of full hCG-stimulated AC activity above basal AC activity, expressed as percent desensitization, measures the extent of LH/CG receptor desensitization. Protein concentrations refer to final concentrations in 50 µl reaction volume. Results are the means ± S.E. of quadruplicate determinations from a single experiment and are representative of three separate experiments. *, differences between BSA/hCG and hCG/hCG values are significant (p < 0.05). B, the ability of E156K ARNO to block LH/CG receptor desensitization is lost when E156K ARNO is boiled for 10 min. For rest of details see panel A. C, effect of E156K ARNO on basal, hCG-, forskolin-, and aluminum fluoride (AlF)-stimulated AC activities in follicular membranes. Membranes were preincubated as described for panel A in the presence of indicated concentrations (in final assay reaction volume) of E146K ARNO and were then subjected to a 5-min AC assay (omitting the 40-min desensitization reaction) in the presence of 10 µg/ml BSA or hCG, 10 µM forskolin, or 10 mM NaF and 20 µM AlCl2 (AlF). The results are the means ± S.E. of quadruplicate determinations. D, E156K ARNO blocks the ability of LH/CG receptor activation to promote beta -arrestin release from membranes. Membranes were treated (30 °C, 30 min in the presence of buffer, MgCl2, EGTA/EDTA) with indicated additions, diluted ~25-fold with 10 mM Tris-HCl, and pelleted (6). Washed membranes were then subjected to Western blot using anti-beta -arrestin antibody (Transduction Laboratories). Equivalent results were seen with anti-arrestin F4C1. The results are representative of three separate experiments.

ARNO contains a C-terminal PH domain that can bind phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (PIP3), the product of PI(4,5)bisphosphatate 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase), with high selectivity and affinity (Kd~85 nM (16)). A point mutation at R280D in the PH domain of ARNO results in a mutant protein that retains its catalytic activity to promote GTP exchange on ARF6 but cannot bind phosphoinositides (14). We have shown that, unlike catalytically active wild-type ARNO (at 25 nM), which promotes LH/CG receptor desensitization, R280D ARNO at 50 nM does not promote LH/CG receptor desensitization (6). This result suggests that the binding of phosphoinositides to the PH domain of ARNO is obligatory for LH/CG receptor to promote activation of ARNO. We therefore sought to determine whether R280D ARNO could function like E156K ARNO in a dominant negative manner to block development of LH/CG receptor desensitization in response to receptor activation. Preincubation of follicular membranes with 200 (Fig. 3A) or 300 nM (not shown) R280D ARNO does not affect the ability of receptor activation to promote LH/CG receptor desensitization. Consistent with this result, preincubation of membranes with the PI 3-kinase inhibitor wortmannin at 100 nM does not reduce the extent of LH/CG receptor desensitization (Fig. 3B). As some PH domains also bind the beta gamma subunits of activated G proteins (17), we tested whether a beta gamma inhibitor peptide (18), corresponding to residues 956-982 of AC2, could block development of LH/CG receptor desensitization. The results (Fig. 3C) show that preincubation of follicular membranes with 10 µM beta gamma -inhibitor peptide QEHA (QEHAQEPEROYMCHIGTMVEFAYALVGK), which blocks beta gamma -dependent stimulation of AC2, beta -adrenergic receptor kinase, and phospholipase C (18), does not affect LH/CG receptor desensitization. Higher concentrations of the QEHA peptide inhibited basal and hCG- and forskolin-stimulated AC activities (Fig. 3C and not shown). Taken together, these results indicate that PIP3 or beta gamma signaling through the PH domain of ARNO does not appear to be obligatory for the activated LH/CG receptor to promote GTP exchange at ARF.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   LH/CG receptor desensitization is independent of the PH domain of ARNO. A, preincubation of membranes with 200 nM R280D ARNO does not affect LH/CG receptor desensitization. For rest of details, see Fig. 2A legend. Results are representative of 4 separate experiments. B, preincubation of membranes with the PI-3 kinase inhibitor wortmannin for 30 min does not disrupt LH/CG receptor desensitization. For rest of details, see Fig. 2A legend. C, preincubation of membranes with the beta gamma inhibitor peptide QEHA at 10 µM does not prevent LH/CG receptor desensitization; higher concentrations of QEHA peptide inhibit basal and hCG- and forskolin-stimulated AC activities. Results are representative of three separate experiments.



    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

ARNO is detected in a purified membrane fraction enriched in AC activity obtained from preovulatory-size porcine ovarian follicles at a concentration of ~32 nmol/mg of membrane protein. Moreover, the expression of ARNO appears to be regulated with follicular maturation. Higher levels of ARNO are detected in membranes of mature preovulatory (8-10 mm) porcine follicles, which express LH/CG receptors, compared with small (1-2 mm) follicles, which do not express LH/CG receptors (15). That increased expression of ARNO correlates with the induction of LH/CG receptors is very interesting and suggests that the same stimulus that induces LH/CG receptors, namely follicle-stimulating hormone (19), might also increase expression of ARNO. These results further suggest that ARNO, in an apparently inactive conformation, is constitutively associated with the plasma membrane of preovulatory ovarian follicles. The conclusion that ARNO is present in an inactive conformation and is activated upon engagement of the LH/CG receptor is based not only on results presented in Fig. 2, showing that LH/CG receptor desensitization is blocked by E156K ARNO, but also on evidence that ARF activation, measured as cholera toxin-catalyzed ADP-ribosylation of the long form of Galpha s, is negligible in the absence of LH/CG receptor activation (20).2 The basis for the apparently constitutive membrane association of ARNO is not clear. However, in other cellular models there is also evidence that a large portion of total cellular ARNO can be associated constitutively with the plasma membrane in the absence of directed membrane-receptor activation both on overexpression in various cell lines (7) and in chromaffin cells isolated from bovine adrenal glands (21).

We have shown with the porcine follicular membrane model that catalytically inactive E156K ARNO acts in a dominant negative manner to selectively block the development of LH/CG receptor desensitization in response to LH/CG receptor activation. Catalytically inactive E156K ARNO blocks the obligatory release of beta -arrestin1 from its membrane docking site. As a result, the LH/CG receptor remains active to signal to Gs and AC despite the continued presence of saturating concentrations of receptor agonist. This result suggests that LH/CG receptor desensitization requires the activation of endogenous ARNO. However, based on the recent identification of the exchange factor for ARF6 (EFA6) (22), in which the guanine nucleotide exchange activity is also insensitive to brefeldin A, we cannot rule out the possibility that the apparent dominant negative effect of E156K ARNO is attributable to its potential ability to sequester available ARF6, thus indirectly blocking LH/CG receptor desensitization potentially mediated by EFA6.

ARNO, along with GRP1 and cytohesin-1, comprise a subfamily of guanine nucleotide exchange factors for the ARFs in which the guanine nucleotide exchange activity is not inhibited by the fungal metabolite brefeldin A (7, 8, 23-25). Each of these factors contains an N-terminal coiled-coil domain, a central Sec7 domain, that is sufficient for guanine nucleotide exchange activity on ARF (26) and is highly homologous with the SEC7 gene in yeast which encodes a GEF required for protein secretion (reviewed in Ref. 27), a C-terminal PH domain, and an adjacent cluster of basic residues (c domain) (8).

The PH domain of the proteins in this subfamily appears to be necessary both for their plasma membrane association and for subsequent guanine nucleotide exchange activity toward membrane-localized ARFs (14, 23, 24, 28, 29). These guanine nucleotide exchange proteins are often localized to the cytosolic fraction of unstimulated cells and have been shown to translocate to the plasma membrane in response to receptor activation by insulin or epidermal growth factor in 3T3 L1 adipocytes and Chinese hamster ovary cells (16, 30). Consistent with these results, transfection of cells with ARNO or cytohesin-1 containing a mutation in the PH domain disrupts the plasma membrane association of these proteins and consequent biological responses, namely cytohesin-1-dependent beta 2 integrin adhesion to adhesion molecule 1 in Jurkat E6 leukemia cells (23) and ARNO-dependent actin reorganization in HeLa cells (14).

The predominant ligands that have been shown to bind to the PH domains of these GEFs are phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) and PIP3 (31). Although there have been seemingly contradictory results on the affinities of the PH domains of these proteins for PIP2 or PIP3, recent evidence from the Czech laboratory (32) has resolved this apparent controversy by showing that ARNO, GRP1, and cytohesin-1 can exhibit either high selectivity for PIP3 or equivalent selectivity for PIP3 and PIP2 depending on whether the PH domain contains a diglycine or triglycine motif, respectively. Moreover, isoforms of each of the proteins in this subfamily appear to exist that express either the diglycine or triglycine motif even in the same tissue (7, 8, 33, 34). Consistent with this result, recruitment and activation of these GEFs can depend on either PIP2 or PIP3, contingent upon whether the diglycine or triglycine motif in the PH domain is present (8, 13, 24, 28, 35). In those cases in which GEF recruitment and activation rely on PIP3, these responses can be readily blocked by PI 3-kinase inhibitors like wortmannin (16, 23, 24, 30). There is also evidence for ARNO and cytohesin-1 that the adjacent C-terminal polybasic c domain cooperates with the PH domain to bind these GEFs tightly to the membrane, possibly by binding a phospholipid with a negative charge (8, 13).

LH/CG receptor desensitization is not inhibited by a point mutation in the PH domain of ARNO, which blocks its binding to all phosphoinositides. One interpretation of these results is that LH/CG receptor-dependent activation of ARNO is independent of the PH domain of ARNO. If phosphoinositide binding to the PH domain is not necessary for ARNO activation, then one would predict that R280D ARNO, like wild-type recombinant ARNO, should promote LH/CG receptor desensitization, since R280D ARNO retains its GTP exchange activity (14). Yet, R280D ARNO does not promote LH/CG receptor desensitization (Ref. 6 and present report). The inability of R280D ARNO to promote LH/CG receptor desensitization might be attributable to its inability to appropriately associate with the plasma membrane because of the mutation in its PH domain. A similar argument can be made for the inability of R280D to block desensitization in a dominant negative manner. Our results showing that R280D ARNO neither stimulates nor inhibits LH/CG receptor desensitization indirectly suggest that the PH domain of ARNO is indeed necessary at least for its membrane association. However, the ineffectiveness of the PI 3-kinase inhibitor wortmannin to block desensitization indicates that ARNO activation is not dependent on PIP3 generated by PI 3-kinase activation. As PIP3 does not appear to participate in the activation of ARNO leading to LH/CG receptor desensitization, it is likely that the predominant ARNO present in follicle membranes contains the triglycine motif in its PH domain, which does not selectively bind PIP3 but rather binds PIP2 with equivalent affinity (32, 36). The recombinant E156K ARNO and ARNO proteins that we have used contain the triglycine motif and are regulated by PIP2 rather than PIP3 (13). Our results therefore suggest that membrane PIP2, either locally synthesized or unmasked, is required for LH/CG receptor to activate ARNO. LH/CG receptor activation has been shown to promote PIP2 synthesis (37, 38). There is also evidence that ARF6 in a GTP- and phosphatidic acid-dependent manner can activate PI 4-phosphate 5-kinase (39) and PI 4-kinase (40) to increase PIP2 synthesis. Future studies are needed to determine how the ability of ARNO to activate ARF is regulated downstream of the LH/CG receptor.

LH/CG receptor desensitization is also not inhibited by the beta gamma inhibitor peptide QEHA. The ineffectiveness of the beta gamma inhibitor peptide QEHA is supported by our earlier evidence that neither transducin beta gamma (at 1 µM) nor rat liver beta gamma (at 400 nM) stimulates LH/CG receptor desensitization and that the beta gamma scavenger GST-beta -adrenergic receptor kinase-peptide fusion protein (at 14 µM) does not inhibit LH/CG receptor desensitization (41). These results suggest that Gbeta gamma binding to the PH domain of ARNO does not mediate LH/CG receptor activation of ARNO. These results, however, do not rule out the possibility that ARNO is anchored to the membrane via Gbeta gamma proteins.

In conclusion, these studies show that endogenous membrane-delimited ARNO appears to be obligatory for the LH/CG receptor to promote beta -arrestin1 release from its membrane docking site and receptor desensitization based on the ability of catalytically inactive ARNO to block both of these responses. Although ARNO activation by the LH/CG receptor is independent of PIP3 and Gbeta gamma , ARNO activation could well be dependent on PIP2. The PH domain of ARNO also appears to be required for its membrane association, but the ligand that interacts with this domain to promote membrane binding is unlikely to be the same one that leads to its activation.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We gratefully acknowledge the gifts of anti-arrestin antibody F4C1 from Dr. Larry Donoso of the Wills Eye Hospital Research Division, Philadelphia, PA, and QEHA peptide from Dr. Ravi Iyengar, Dept. of Pharmacology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, City University of New York, NY. We also thank Dr. Evelyn Maizels for critically reading this manuscript and Dr. Subhendu Mukhopadhy for purifying recombinant E156K and R280D ARNO.


    FOOTNOTES

* This work was funded by National Institutes of Health Grants R01 HD/DK 38060 (to M. H.-D.), and R01 AI 32991 (to J. E. C.) and by a Lalor Foundation fellowship (to S. M.). Preliminary results were presented at the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Endocrine Society, Toronto, Canada, June 2000.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Northwestern University Medical School, 303 East Chicago Ave., Chicago, IL 60611. Tel.: 312-503-8940; Fax: 312-503-0566; E-mail: mhd@northwestern.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 3, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.C000725200

2 L. M. Salvador, S. Mukherjee, R. A. Kahn, M. L. Lamm, M.-F. Bader, H. Hamm, M. M. Rasenick, J. E. Casanova, and M. Hunzicker-Dunn, manuscript in preparation.


    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: LH/CG, luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin; hCG, human choriogonadotropin; ARF, ADP ribosylation factor; ARNO, ARF nucleotide binding site opener; BSA, bovine serum albumin; 3i, third intracellular loop; Gs, stimulatory guanine nucleotide-binding protein; GEF, guanine nucleotide exchange factor; AC, adenylyl cyclase; PI, phosphatidylinositol; PIP3, phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate; PIP2, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate; PH, pleckstrin homology.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES


1. Hausdorff, W. P., Caron, M. G., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1990) FASEB. J. 4, 2881-2889[Abstract]
2. Bockaert, J., Hunzicker-Dunn, M., and Birnbaumer, L. (1976) J. Biol. Chem. 251, 2653-2663[Abstract]
3. Ekstrom, R. C., and Hunzicker-Dunn, M. (1989) Endocrinology 124, 956-963[Abstract]
4. Mukherjee, S., Palczewski, K., Gurevich, V. V., and Hunzicker-Dunn, M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 12984-12989[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Mukherjee, S., Palczewski, K., Benovic, J. L., Gurevich, V. V., and Hunzicker-Dunn, M. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 493-498[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Mukherjee, S., Gurevich, V. V., Jones, J. C. R., Casanova, J. E., Frank, S. R., Maizels, E. T., Bader, M.-F., Kahn, R. A., Palczewski, K., Aktories, K., and Hunzicker-Dunn, M. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 5901-5906[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Frank, S., Upender, S., Hansen, S. H., and Cassanova, J. E. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 23-27[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Chardin, P., Paris, S., Antonny, B., Robineau, S., Beraud-Dufour, S., Jackson, C. L., and Chabre, M. (1996) Nature 384, 481-484[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Ekstrom, R. C., and Hunzicker-Dunn, M. (1989) Endocrinology 125, 2470-2474[Abstract]
10. Ezra, E., and Salomon, Y. (1980) J. Biol. Chem. 255, 653-658[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Ezra, E., and Salomon, Y. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 5377-5382[Free Full Text]
12. Bender, F. E., Douglass, L. W., and Kramer, A. (1982) Statistical Methods for Food and Agriculture , AVI Publishing Co., Inc., Westport, CT
13. Santy, L. C., Frank, S. R., Hatfield, J. C., and Casanova, J. E. (1999) Curr. Biol. 9, 1173-1176[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Frank, S. R., Hatfield, J. C., and Casanova, J. E. (1998) Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 3133-3146[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Channing, C. P., and Kammerman, S. (1974) Biol. Reprod. 10, 179-198[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Venkateswarlu, K., Oatey, P. B., Tavare, J. M., and Cullen, P. J. (1998) Curr. Biol. 8, 463-466[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Bottomley, M. J., Salim, K., and Panayotou, G. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1436, 165-183[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Chen, J., DeVivo, M., Dingus, J., Harry, A., Li, J., Sui, J., Carty, D. J., Blank, J. L., Exton, J. H., Stoffel, R. H., Inglese, J., Lefkowitz, R. J., Logothetis, D. E., Hildebrandt, J. D., and Iyengar, R. (1975) Science 268, 1166-1169
19. Hsueh, A. J. W., Adashi, E. Y., Jones, P. B. C., and Welsh, T. H., Jr. (1984) Endocr. Rev. 5, 76-110[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Rajagopalan-Gupta, R. M., Rasenick, M. M., and Hunzicker-Dunn, M. (1997) Mol. Endocrinol. 11, 538-549[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Caumont, A.-S., Vitale, N., Gensse, M., Galas, M.-C., Casanova, J. E., and Bader, M.-F. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 15637-15644[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Franco, M., Peters, P. J., Boretto, J., van Donselaar, E., neri, A., D'Souza-Schorey, C., and Chavrier, P. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 1480-1491[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Nagel, W., Zeitlmann, L., Schilcher, P., Geiger, C., Kolanus, J., and Kolanus, W. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 14853-14861[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Klarlund, J. K., Guilherme, A., Holik, J. J., Virbasius, J. V., Chawla, A., and Czech, M. P. (1997) Science 275, 1927-1930[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Franco, M., Boretto, J., Robineau, S., Monier, S., Foud, B., Chardin, P., and Chavrier, P. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 9926-9931[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Roth, M. G. (1999) Cell 97, 149-152[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Moss, J., and Vaughan, M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 21431-21434[Free Full Text]
28. Paris, S., Beraud-Dufour, S., Robineau, S., gay, J., Antonny, B., Chabre, M., and Chardin, P. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 22221-22226[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Nagel, W., Schilcher, P., Zeitlmann, L., and Kolanus, W. (1999) Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 1981-1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Langille, S. E., Patki, V., Klarlund, J. K., Buxton, J. M., Holik, J. J., Chawla, A., Corvera, S., and Czech, M. P. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 27099-27104[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Jackson, C. L., and Casanova, J. E. (2000) Trends Cell Biol. 10, 60-67[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Klarlund, J., Tsiaras, W., Holik, J. J., Chawla, A., and Czech, M. P. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 32816-32821[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Ogasawara, M., Kim, S.-C., Adamik, R., Togawa, A., Ferrans, V. J., Takeda, K., Kirby, M., Moss, J., and Vaughan, M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 3221-3230[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Kim, H. S., Chen, Y., and Lonai, P. (1998) FEBS Lett. 433, 312-316[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Kharlund, J. K., Rameh, L. E., Cantley, L. C., Buxton, J. M., Holik, H. H., Sakelis, C., Patki, V., Corvera, S., and Czeck, M. P. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1859-1862[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Cullen, P. J., and Chardin, P. (2000) Curr. Biol. 10, R876-R878[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Dimino, M. J., Snitzer, J., and Noland, T. A., Jr. (1987) Biol. Reprod. 36, 97-102[Abstract]
38. Davis, J. S., Weakland, L. L., Farese, R. V., and West, L. A. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 8515-8521[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Honda, A., Nogami, M., Yokozeki, T., Yamazaki, M., Nakamura, H., Watanabe, H., Kawamoto, K., Nakayama, K., Morris, A. J., Frohman, M. A., and Kanaho, Y. (1999) Cell 99, 521-532[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Godi, A., Pertile, P., Meyers, R., Marra, P., DiTullio, G., Iurisci, C., Luini, A., Corda, D., and De Matteis, M. A. (1999) Nat. Cell Biol. 1, 280-287[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Rajagopalan-Gupta, R. M., Mukherjee, S., Zhu, X., Ho, Y.-K., Hamm, H., Birnbaumer, M., Birnbaumer, L., and Hunzicker-Dunn, M. (1999) Endocrinology 140, 1612-1621[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.