DNA Synthesis and Mitotic Clonal Expansion Is Not a Required Step for 3T3-L1 Preadipocyte Differentiation into Adipocytes*

Zilong QiuDagger , Yong WeiDagger , Nan ChenDagger , Manrong JiangDagger , Jiarui WuDagger §, and Kan LiaoDagger §

From the Dagger  State Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology and § Shanghai Research Center of Life Sciences, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China 200031

Received for publication, December 27, 2000



    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Upon differentiation induction of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes by a hormone mixture containing 1-isobutyl-3-methylxanthine, dexamethasone, and insulin, the preadipocytes undergo ~2 rounds of mitotic clonal expansion, which just precedes the adipogenic gene expression program and has been thought to be an essential early step for differentiation initiation. By inducing 3T3-L1 preadipocytes with each individual hormone, it was determined that the mitotic clonal expansion was induced only by insulin and not by 1-isobutyl-3-methylxanthine or dexamethasone. Cell number counting and fluorescence-activated cell-sorting analysis indicated that a significant fraction of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes differentiated into adipocytes without mitotic clonal expansion when induced with the combination of 1-isobutyl-3-methylxanthine and dexamethasone. Furthermore, when normally induced 3T3-L1 preadipocytes were treated with PD98059 (an inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase 1) to block the activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (Erk) 1 and Erk2, the mitotic clonal expansion was blocked, but adipocyte differentiation was not affected. These observations were confirmed by bromodeoxyuridine labeling. The differentiated adipocytes induced with 1-isobutyl-3-methylxanthine and dexamethasone or standard hormone mixture plus PD98059 were not labeled by bromodeoxyuridine. Thus, it is evident that 3T3-L1 preadipocytes could differentiate into adipocytes without DNA synthesis and mitotic clonal expansion. Our results also suggested that activation of Erk1 and Erk2 is essential to but not sufficient for induction of mitotic clonal expansion.



    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Obesity has become a major health hazard in many countries and has been indicated as a risk factor for many physiological disorders, such as diabetes, hypertension, and heart problems. As the major cellular component in adipose tissue, adipocytes play a key role in obesity. The excessive growth of adipose tissue in obesity has been suggested as expansion of adipocytes both in cell size and in cell number (1, 2). To better understand adipocyte physiology, in vitro cell models, such as 3T3-L1 and 3T3-F442A, have been used. These model cell lines provide a useful tool to study the adipocyte differentiation process (1, 3). 3T3-L1 cells can be induced to differentiate into mature adipocytes in cell culture (4-6). It is one of the most used preadipocyte models to study the adipogenesis process. The preadipocyte differentiation program involves several stages. Immediately after hormonal stimulation (IGF-I1 or insulin at a nonphysiologically high concentration, a glucocorticoid, dexamethasone (DEX), and a cAMP phosphodiesterase inhibitor that increases intracellular cAMP, 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (MIX)), postconfluent G0 3T3-L1 preadipocytes reenter a period of the cell cycle called mitotic clonal expansion. The gene expression program leading to terminal adipocyte differentiation is initiated during and after this mitotic clonal expansion period. It has been proposed that this mitotic clonal expansion might facilitate the DNA remodeling for the adipogenesis gene expression program (3).

Whereas it is clear that the mitotic clonal expansion phase precedes the adipogenic gene expression program, whether this cell proliferation process is an obligatory step along the 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation process is still not clear. Several studies have indicated that mitotic clonal expansion and 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation are both blocked by the DNA synthesis inhibitor aphidicolin (7), the antiproliferation reagent rapamycin (8), calpain inhibitor N-acetyl-leu-leu-norleucinal (9), or tumor necrosis factor alpha  (10). These results supported the view that mitotic growth is a necessary step in the adipocyte differentiation process. However, in our previous studies, we have found that 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation can be blocked with the protein tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor vanadate, whereas mitotic clonal expansion is not affected (11, 12). Vanadate inhibits the differentiation induction signal from IGF-I receptor tyrosine kinase by blocking the turnover of tyrosine-phosphorylated c-Crk (12). Further investigation indicates that the effect of vanadate on blocking 3T3-L1 preadipocyte differentiation occurs at a very early stage of differentiation induction, before the initiation of mitotic clonal expansion (12). These results suggest that the activated IGF-I receptor tyrosine kinase induces 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation and mitotic clonal expansion by two separate signal transduction pathways. In addition, primary preadipocytes from human adipose tissue enter the differentiation process without mitotic clonal expansion (13). These observations provide an impetus for us to investigate whether mitotic clonal expansion is an essential step during 3T3-L1 the preadipocyte differentiation induction process or a parallel event induced by the differentiation induction hormones.

In the present study, we reported that two rounds of the mitotic clonal expansion cell cycle occurred during 3T3-L1 preadipocyte differentiation induction and that the initiation of clonal expansion required activation of the Erk1 and Erk2 MAP kinases. Of three differentiation induction reagents (MIX, DEX, and a high concentration of insulin in place of IGF-I), only insulin was capable of inducing mitotic clonal expansion. 3T3-L1 preadipocytes induced with MIX and DEX (omitting insulin) or induced with the standard hormone mixture plus MEK inhibitor PD98059 were still able to differentiate into adipocytes, but without DNA synthesis and mitotic clonal expansion. Thus, our results suggest that DNA synthesis and mitotic clonal expansion is not an essential step required for the 3T3-L1 preadipocyte differentiation process; rather, it is a separable event induced by the activated IGF-I receptor tyrosine kinase through a signal pathway of MAP kinases Erk1 and Erk2.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- Anti-Erk and anti-p-Erk (against the critical Tyr residue phosphorylated peptide) antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody, BrdUrd, DAPI, sodium orthovanadate, dexamethasone, 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine, and insulin were purchased from Sigma. PD98059 was purchased from New England Biolab. Mouse monoclonal anti-BrdUrd antibody was purchased from Becton Dickinson. Fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibody was purchased from Jackson Laboratories, and DMEM was obtained from Life Technologies, Inc.

Cell Culture and Differentiation Induction of 3T3-L1 Preadipocytes-- 3T3-L1 preadipocytes were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% calf serum and allowed to reach confluence. Differentiation of 2-day postconfluent preadipocytes (designated as day 0) was initiated with 1 µg/ml insulin, 1 µM DEX, and 0.5 mM MIX in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (6, 14). After 48 h (day 2), the culture medium was replaced with DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1 µg/ml insulin, and the cells were then fed every other day with DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum. Cytoplasmic triglyceride droplets were visible by day 4, and cells were fully differentiated by day 8.

For stimulation with individual hormone (MIX, DEX, or insulin alone) or a two-hormone combination (MIX plus DEX, MIX plus insulin, or DEX plus insulin), 2-day postconfluent preadipocytes were induced by hormone(s) at the above-mentioned concentration for 48 h. Cells were trypsinized from culture dishes, and the cell numbers were counted using a hemocytometer plate. For cells carried to final differentiation, the induction culture medium was replaced after 48 h with DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum supplemented with or without 1 µg/ml insulin as described in the figure legends, and then the normal cell feeding protocol was followed until day 8.

For PD98059 treatment, 20 µM PD98059 was added to the cells with the differentiation induction hormone mixture on day 0. The cells were then cultured following the standard differentiation induction protocol with a supplement of 20 µM PD98059 until day 4.

FACS Analysis, Cell Counting, and Oil-Red-O Staining-- 3T3-L1 cells (6-cm plate) were trypsinized from the culture dishes and collected by centrifugation. An aliquot was subjected to cell counting using a hemocytometer plate. The cells were then fixed in 70% ethanol, pelleted, and treated with 1 mg/ml RNase A for 30 min at 37 °C. After staining with 20 µg/ml propidium iodide, the DNA content in cells was determined by FACS analysis. For Oil-Red-O staining, 3T3-L1 adipocyte monolayers (usually on day 8) were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then fixed for 2 min with 3.7% formaldehyde in PBS. Oil-Red-O (0.5%) in isopropanol was diluted with 1.5 volumes of water, filtered, and added to the fixed cell monolayers for 1 h at room temperature. Cell monolayers were then washed with water, and the stained triglyceride droplets in the cells were visualized and photographed.

Preparation of Cellular Extracts, SDS-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis, and Western Blotting-- For protein analysis, cell monolayers from cells treated as described in the figure legends were washed three times with cold PBS. Cells were then lysed directly in boiling 1× Laemmli SDS sample buffer (15) containing 20 mM dithiothreitol. The cell lysate was then heated at 100 °C for 5 min. For Western blotting, cell extracts (usually containing ~15 µg of protein) were subjected to 12.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and then transferred to Immobilon-P membrane (Millipore). After blocking with 2% nonfat dried milk in 1× TTBS (Tween/Tris-buffered saline) containing 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween, and 0.001% thimerosal for 2 h at room temperature, membranes were incubated with primary antibody for 2 h at room temperature, followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody for 45 min. Target proteins were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence.

BrdUrd Labeling for DNA Synthesis-- Cells were cultured on coverslips until 2-day postconfluence and induced to differentiate with different induction conditions as described in the figure legends. During the S phase of the cell cycle, 30 µg/ml BrdUrd was pulsed for 2 h (from the 16th to the 18th h after the induction) to label DNA synthesis. The coverslips were fixed in 70% ethanol for 30 min and then stored in 70% ethanol at 4 °C for immunofluorescence analysis. For cells carried to final differentiation, the BrdUrd labeling medium was replaced with preconditioned medium, which was obtained from a parallel cell culture dish treated with the same induction condition. After 48 h, the medium was replaced with DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum with or without a supplement of 1 µg/ml insulin as described in the figure legends. By day 8, cells were fixed with 70% ethanol and stored in the same ethanol solution at 4 °C for immunofluorescence analysis.

BrdUrd labeling was also conducted on day 3 3T3-L1 cells to reveal the effect of the insulin supplementation in the medium. At the 16th h after the medium change, 30 µg/ml BrdUrd was pulsed for 2 h, and the labeling medium was replaced with preconditioned medium obtained from a cell culture dish fed in parallel. On day 4, the cells were fed with normal medium every other day until day 8.

Immunofluorescence-- Ethanol-fixed coverslips were incubated in 100% methanol for 10 min at room temperature. The coverslips were then treated with 1.5 M HCl for 30 min, blocked with 0.5% Tween 20 in PBS solution for 5 min, and incubated with anti-BrdUrd primary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. After washing, fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibody in a Tween-PBS solution containing 0.1 µg/ml DAPI was added to the coverslips for 1 h at room temperature. After washing coverslips with Tween-PBS twice for 5 min to remove the secondary antibody, the coverslips were mounted for immunofluorescence microscope analysis (AXIOSKOP 20; Zeiss).

Analysis of Erk1 and Erk2-- To minimize the effect of medium change on the activation of Erk1 and Erk2, 3T3-L1 preadipocytes were fed with DMEM plus 10% FBS 1 day before the differentiation induction. On day 0, the differentiation inducers were added directly to the culture medium without changing the medium. The remaining steps followed the standard differentiation protocol. In this modified protocol, adipocyte differentiation and mitotic clonal expansion progressed normally, without any detectable changes. For analysis of Erk activation, postconfluent 3T3-L1 preadipocytes were fed with DMEM containing 10% FBS. The next day, 20 µM PD98059 or 25 µM sodium orthovanadate was added to the culture medium for 1 h, and then a mixture of MIX, DEX, and insulin was added to the medium to initiate the differentiation process. At the indicated time point (time of the addition of MDI is designated as 0 min), cells were harvested by lysing the cells directly in 1× boiling Laemmli SDS sample buffer with 20 mM dithiothreitol. Total Erk protein and the activated tyrosine-phosphorylated Erk were detected with antibodies against Erk or tyrosine-phosphorylated Erk, respectively, on Western blot.

For insulin-induced Erk activation, after the medium change (24 h) and pretreatment with PD98059 or vanadate (1 h pretreatment), insulin was added to the cells to initiate the mitotic clonal expansion process. At each time point, the cells were harvested as described above.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Two rounds of mitotic clonal expansion were observed during 3T3-L1 preadipocyte differentiation induction and induced only by insulin. It was observed that after 3T3-L1 preadipocytes differentiated into adipocytes, the cell numbers were usually increased by 3-4-fold (Fig. 1A). This is consistent with our previous results and results reported by other researchers (9-12). To ascertain how many cell cycles occurred during the clonal expansion period, we took advantage of the fact that postconfluent 3T3-L1 preadipocytes enter mitotic clonal expansion synchronously after the differentiation induction. By cell number counting and FACS analysis of the cellular DNA content, two rounds of cell cycle were observed, and the cell number increase was matched by the DNA content analysis, especially for the first cell cycle, which is well synchronized (Fig. 1, B and C). Complete DNA synthesis and transition from diploid to tetraploid were observed (Fig. 1C). Thus, the clonal expansion was full cell cycle mitosis. Because differentiation induction is initiated with three hormones working through three signal pathways (MIX on cAMP, DEX on glucocorticoid receptor, and insulin on IGF-I receptor tyrosine kinase), it is important to know whether the mitotic clonal expansion is the result of the combined effects of three hormones or the result of one of the hormones. By inducing 3T3-L1 cells with individual hormone or a different combination of two hormones on day 0 and counting the cell number after the completion of the first cell cycle, it was clear that once insulin was present, the cell number was increased. Even with insulin alone, mitosis still occurred (Fig. 1D). This insulin-activated mitosis was confirmed by analysis of DNA synthesis with BrdUrd labeling. The incorporation of BrdUrd in cells exposed to insulin or to a hormone mixture containing insulin was significantly higher than that in cells exposed to other hormones (Fig. 1E). Because insulin is working through the IGF-I receptor in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes (16, 17), mitotic clonal expansion is induced by the activation of IGF-I receptor.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Mitotic clonal expansion during the 3T3-L1 preadipocyte differentiation induction process. 3T3-L1 preadipocyte differentiation was induced with the standard induction protocol. The cell number was determined at different times (A, days; B, hours) after the induction of differentiation. C, FACS analysis for DNA content of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes during mitotic clonal expansion after the differentiation induction. 0 hr, 14 hr, 18 hr, and so forth indicate the time points after the differentiation initiation at which cells were harvested. D, cell number counting after the first round of cell division during the mitotic clonal expansion period. Cells were induced with different combinations of hormone(s). At ~40 h after the induction, the cell numbers were counted. Day 0, cells before the induction; M, induction with MIX alone; D, induction with DEX; I, induction with insulin; MDI, induction with a combination of MIX, DEX, and insulin; MI, induction with MIX and insulin; MD, induction with MIX and DEX; DI, induction with DEX and insulin; FBS, control cells fed with fetal bovine serum medium without any inducers. E, BrdUrd labeling of DNA synthesis during mitotic clonal expansion. BrdUrd was pulsed to the cells at S phase (from the 16th to the 18th h after the induction). The induction conditions were the same as those described in D.

In the Absence of Insulin, MIX and DEX Could Induce Significant 3T3-L1 Adipocyte Differentiation without the Mitotic Clonal Expansion-- Because insulin is the sole factor to induce mitotic clonal expansion, we attempted to induce 3T3-L1 preadipocyte differentiation with MIX and DEX. As shown in Fig. 2A, induction of preadipocytes with MIX, DEX, and insulin led to an almost doubled cell number by day 2, whereas induction with MIX and DEX caused no cell number increase. After the change of medium on day 2, MIX and DEX-induced cells fed with insulin-supplemented medium started mitosis. By day 4, the cell number increased and was close to that induced with the standard differentiation protocol (MDI for 48 h plus insulin for an additional 48 h). In contrast, MIX and DEX-induced cells fed with plain medium remained in the quiescent state, and no cell number increase was detected. FACS analysis confirmed the results of cell number counting (Fig. 2B). Only in MIX and DEX-induced cells fed with insulin-supplemented medium was DNA synthesis observed. Thus, induction with MIX and DEX (without insulin) in the first 2 days followed by normal insulin-supplemented medium for an additional 2 days delayed the cells entrance into mitotic clonal expansion, whereas induction only with MIX and DEX for 2 days resulted in the cells staying in the quiescent state without entering into clonal expansion.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Adipocyte differentiation under the induction of MIX and DEX without mitotic clonal expansion. A, cell numbers at different days after induction were determined. MDI+I, induction with the standard differentiation protocol; MD, induction only with MIX and DEX for 2 days; MD+I, induction with MIX and DEX for 2 days and then with insulin for 2 additional days. B, FACS analysis on cells with or without exposure to insulin after MD induction. After induction with MD for 2 days, the induction medium was replaced with culture medium supplemented with or without insulin (1 µg/ml). At 20 h after the medium change, the cells were harvested for FACS analysis. MD, cells induced with MIX and DEX for 2 days and harvested before the medium change. MD 20 h, cells induced with MIX and DEX for 2 days, changed with normal FBS medium, and harvested at 20 h after the medium change. MD+I 20 h, cells induced with MIX and DEX for 2 days, changed with insulin-supplemented FBS medium, and harvested at 20 h after the medium change. C, Oil-Red-O staining of 3T3-L1 cells after the differentiation induction. 3T3-L1 preadipocytes were induced with different differentiation protocols. 8 days after the initiation of differentiation, cells were stained with Oil-Red-O to reveal the triglyceride droplets. FBS, cells fed every other day with medium containing 10% FBS for 8 days. MDI+I, MD, and MD+I are as defined in A. D, Western blot of aP2, an adipocyte-specific protein marker. 0 refers to 2-day postconfluent cells without induction. The other numbers (1, 2, 3, 4, and 6) refer to the number of days after the differentiation induction on which the cells were harvested for protein analysis. MD, MD+I, and MDI+I are as defined in A.

Adipocyte differentiation under these induction conditions was analyzed by the accumulation of cytoplasmic triglyceride and the expression of adipocyte marker protein aP2 (Fig. 2, C and D). As shown by Oil-Red-O staining (Fig. 2C), 3T3-L1 preadipocytes induced with MIX and DEX for 2 days and then with insulin for an additional 2 days differentiated into adipocytes normally, although the clonal expansion was delayed by 2 days compared with standard condition-induced 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. Thus, delaying the mitotic clonal expansion did not have a detectable effect on the 3T3-L1 cell differentiation. Furthermore, when 3T3-L1 preadipocytes were induced without insulin for the entire differentiation process (MIX and DEX for the first 2 days and then medium without an insulin supplement), a significant fraction of the preadipocytes differentiated into adipocytes, even though no mitotic clonal expansion occurred; and the differentiated adipocytes were evenly distributed in the entire cell monolayer. The expression of adipocyte marker protein aP2 confirmed the results of Oil-Red-O staining. In all three cases (standard induction condition: MDI for 2 days and insulin for 2 days; clonal expansion delayed condition: MD for 2 days and insulin for 2 days; no clonal expansion: MD for 2 days), expression of aP2 protein started on day 3, and its expression was further increased in fully differentiated adipocytes (Fig. 2D). These results indicated that the differentiation of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes into adipocytes was not related to their mitotic clonal expansion.

DNA Synthesis Is Not Required for 3T3-L1 Preadipocyte Differentiation-- The results of FACS analysis and cell number counting indicated that a significant fraction of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes differentiated into adipocytes without undergoing mitotic clonal expansion when induced with MIX and DEX. To confirm these results, BrdUrd was used to label DNA synthesis. Therefore, if adipocyte differentiation requires mitotic clonal expansion, then most of the differentiated adipocytes will be labeled with BrdUrd. When BrdUrd was added to the cells during the S phase (from the 16th to 18th h after the hormonal stimulation), most MDI-induced cells were labeled by BrdUrd as shown in Fig. 3, A and B. In contrast, only a small percentage of cells induced with MIX and DEX were labeled with BrdUrd, and it was the same as the percentage of BrdUrd-labeled control cells fed with DMEM and 10% FBS. Although the adipocyte differentiation in MIX and DEX-induced cells was not as complete as that in MDI-induced cells (37% versus 70% of the cells containing visible triglyceride droplets), only around 15% of differentiated adipocytes with MIX and DEX induction were labeled by BrdUrd. This ratio of BrdUrd incorporation in differentiated adipocytes was in the same range of BrdUrd incorporation in the total cell population. If mitotic clonal expansion were a required step for adipocyte differentiation, we would expect a much higher BrdUrd incorporation ratio in adipocytes than in total cells. Thus, the MIX and DEX-induced adipocytes did not undergo DNA synthesis and hence mitosis.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   BrdUrd labeling of adipocytes under different induction conditions. A, immunofluorescence analysis of day 8 adipocytes pulsed with BrdUrd for 2 h (from the 16th to the 18th h after initiation of differentiation by inducers). The time period of BrdUrd pulse corresponds to the S phase for standard MDI-induced cells. FBS, MDI+I, MD, and MD+I are as defined in the Fig. 2 legend. Cell, phase-contrast image; DAPI, DAPI-stained nuclei; BrdU, BrdUrd-labeled nuclei. The statistical analysis of cells with BrdUrd labeling is shown in B. B, cells in several microscopic view fields were counted for each experiment, and the results from three experiments were averaged. Diff.%, the percentage of cells with visible triglyceride droplets over total cells; BrdU%, cells with BrdUrd-positive nuclei over DAPI-stained total cell nuclei; Diff.(BrdU+)/Diff., BrdUrd-positive adipocytes (cells with visible triglyceride droplets) over total adipocytes. C, statistical results of BrdUrd labeling on day 3 for mitosis induced by insulin (as a supplement in the medium). 3T3-L1 cells were induced with the indicated inducers for 2 days, and then the medium was replaced with new medium (with or without the insulin supplement). BrdUrd was pulsed to the cells from the 16th h to the 18th h after the medium change. By day 8, the cells were analyzed with a immunofluorescence microscope, and the numbers were determined as described in B.

In the standard differentiation induction protocol, after the initial hormone induction the induction medium was replaced with medium supplemented with insulin. Because of the mitogenic effect of insulin on clonal expansion (Fig. 1), MIX and DEX-induced cells would have a delayed mitotic clonal expansion if they were fed with insulin-supplemented medium. Thus, the BrdUrd labeling experiment was also conducted on day 3 cells, i.e. after the medium change. The result shown in Fig. 3C indicated that the basal level of BrdUrd labeling was observed in cells induced with MIX and DEX, which was replaced with a no-insulin medium. However, when replaced with insulin-supplemented medium, a significant amount of cells induced with MIX and DEX were labeled by BrdUrd, indicating a delayed mitotic clonal expansion. However, the adipocyte differentiation was normal. Thus, the results from cell counting, FACS analysis, and BrdUrd labeling were very consistent with each other. They provided compelling evidence that 3T3-L1 preadipocytes could differentiate into adipocytes without DNA synthesis and mitotic clonal expansion.

MEK-1 Inhibitor PD98059 Blocked Mitotic Clonal Expansion without Affecting Adipocyte Differentiation-- Due to the lack of exposure to insulin, 3T3-L1 preadipocyte differentiation induced with MIX and DEX was only about half of the normally induced differentiation. To analyze the role of mitotic clonal expansion in the normally induced 3T3-L1 preadipocyte differentiation process, MEK-1 inhibitor PD98059 (18-20) was used to block the activation of MAP kinases Erk1 and Erk2. It has been reported that PD98059 blocks the activation of Erk1 and Erk2 MAP kinases by IGF-I in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes and that it also blocks the proliferation of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes (21). In addition, it has no effect on the adipocyte differentiation (21, 22). By adding 20 µM PD98059 during the differentiation induction process (from day 0 to day 4), PD98059 almost completely blocked mitotic clonal expansion (Fig. 4A). In the presence of PD98059, the cell number was only slightly increased as compared with noninduced cells. The result of FACS analysis (Fig. 4B) was consistent with the cell number counting. In MDI-induced cells treated with PD98059, only a small fraction of cells had DNA synthesis during the clonal expansion period, whereas in control MDI-induced cells, most of the cells had DNA synthesis. Thus, it is clear that PD98059 treatment inhibits mitotic clonal expansion.



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   PD98059 blocks mitotic clonal expansion but not adipocyte differentiation. A, cell numbers were counted during the differentiation induction process. FBS, cells fed with FBS DMEM every other day; MDI, cells induced with the standard differentiation protocol; MDI+PD, cells induced with the standard differentiation protocol in the presence of PD98059 during the first 4 days. B, FACS analysis of DNA content during the first mitotic clonal expansion cell cycle. 0 h, postconfluent cells before induction. 14 h MDI, 20 h MDI, and 24 h MDI, cells harvested at the indicated time after differentiation induction with MDI. 14 h+PD, 20 h+PD, and 24 h+PD, cells induced with MDI in the presence of PD98059. C, Oil-Red-O staining of 3T3-L1 cells after differentiation induction in the presence or absence of PD98059 as described under "Experimental Procedures." 8 days after the differentiation induction, cells were stained with Oil-Red-O to reveal triglyceride droplets. MDI, I, the standard differentiation induction with MDI for 2 days and insulin for an additional 2 days. MDI+PD, I+PD, induction with MDI plus PD98059 for 2 days and insulin plus PD98059 for an additional 2 days. FBS, feeding with FBS culture medium. FBS+PD, feeding with culture medium plus PD98059 for the first 4 days and then with medium only. D, immunofluorescence analysis of BrdUrd-labeled adipocytes. 3T3-L1 cells were induced following the standard differentiation protocol in the presence or absence of PD98059. BrdUrd was pulsed in the S phase corresponding to the first mitotic clonal expansion cell cycle (from the 16th to the 18th h after the addition of inducers). MDI, I and MDI+PD, I+PD are as defined in C. Cell, phase-contrast image; DAPI, DAPI-stained nuclei; BrdU, BrdUrd-labeled nuclei. E, statistical results of BrdUrd-labeled cells induced in the presence or absence of PD98059. The results are the average of three experiments. MDI, the standard differentiation induction; MDI+PD, the standard induction in the presence of PD98059 for the first 4 days; FBS, feeding with FBS culture medium; FBS+PD, feeding with culture medium plus PD98059 for the first 4 days and then with medium only. The labels are the same as those described in Fig. 3B.

Although PD98059 blocked mitotic clonal expansion, it had no effect on adipocyte differentiation. As shown in Fig. 4C, in the presence of PD98059, 3T3-L1 preadipocytes differentiated into adipocytes without any difference from adipocytes induced by standard protocol. Results of BrdUrd labeling confirmed the observation that PD98059 blocked mitotic clonal expansion but not adipocyte differentiation (Fig. 4, D and E). The total adipocyte differentiation in the presence or absence of PD98059 was very similar (both around 80% of the cells containing visible triglyceride droplets). However, only 20% of the cells were labeled by BrdUrd in the presence of PD98059, whereas >70% of the cells were labeled by BrdUrd in the standard induced control cells. In differentiated adipocytes, close to 80% of the normally induced adipocytes were labeled by BrdUrd, whereas less than 20% of the adipocytes were labeled by BrdUrd in PD98059-treated cells. Thus, In the presence of PD98059, most differentiated adipocytes had no DNA synthesis and mitosis.

Activation of MAP Kinase Erk1 and ERk2 Is Essential but Not Sufficient for Mitotic Clonal Expansion-- During differentiation induction, 3T3-L1 cells started to enter S phase 14 h after the addition of differentiation inducers (Fig. 1C). Thus, the activation of Erk1 and Erk2 by MEK-1 during the first 14 h was investigated. As shown in Fig. 5A, in MDI-induced cells, Erk1 and Erk2 were significantly activated (as shown by the increase in the phosphorylated form of Erk1 and Erk2), whereas the addition of PD98059 to MDI-induced cells greatly diminished the phosphorylation of Erk1 and Erk2. In our previous studies (12), the protein tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor vanadate blocked 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation without affecting mitotic clonal expansion. Thus, the effect of vanadate on the activation of Erk1 and Erk2 was also investigated. It was clear that vanadate did not affect the MDI-induced activation of Erk1 and Erk2.



View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Analysis of Erk1 and Erk2 phosphorylation by MEK-1 in the presence of PD98059 or vanadate. A, 3T3-L1 cells were induced as described under "Experimental Procedures." At the indicated time points (0, before induction; 10', 10 min after induction; 1 h, 1 h after induction, and so forth), cells were harvested for Western blot analysis. Phospho-Erk is detected with an antibody specifically against the peptide containing the critical phosphotyrosine (Tyr-204 in Erk1). MDI, MDI-induced cells; MDI+PD, MDI-induced cells pretreated with PD98059; MDI+VO4, MDI-induced cells pretreated with vanadate. B, the Erk phosphorylation induced by insulin. Induction with insulin was described under "Experimental Procedures." I, insulin-induced cells; I+PD, insulin-induced cells pretreated with PD98059; I+VO4, insulin-induced cells pretreated with vanadate.

Of MIX, DEX, and insulin, only insulin, acting through the IGF-I receptor (16, 17), was capable of inducing mitotic clonal expansion (Fig. 1). The results of study of the activation of Erk1 and Erk2 by insulin showed a pattern similar to their activation by MDI (Fig. 5B). PD98059 treatment also blocked the activation of Erk1 and Erk2 by insulin, whereas vanadate treatment did not interfere with insulin-activated Erk1 and Erk2 phosphorylation and even slightly increased the phosphorylation of Erk1 and Erk2. MIX alone could also increase the phosphorylation of Erk1 and Erk2, but it caused no mitosis (results not shown). Thus, activation of Erk1 and Erk2 is not sufficient to promote growth-arrested postconfluent 3T3-L1 preadipocytes to enter mitotic clonal expansion during differentiation induction. Treatment with DEX alone did not activate Erk1 and Erk2 (results not shown).


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Mitotic clonal expansion during differentiation induction is a rather unique process for adipocyte differentiation. However, its role in the adipocyte differentiation process has not been fully understood. In the debate over whether this cell proliferation is a required step along the differentiation process or a parallel event activated by differentiation inducers, our studies provided evidence for the latter. As indicated in our previous studies with vanadate, which selectively blocks adipocyte differentiation but not mitotic clonal expansion, mitotic clonal expansion is not likely to be an obligatory step in the adipocyte differentiation process because differentiation is blocked at the event(s) preceding mitotic clonal expansion, which, on the other hand, is not inhibited (12).

In the present study, we further analyzed the relationship between 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation induction and mitotic clonal expansion during differentiation induction. By cell number counting and FACS analysis, it was found that two rounds of cell division occurred in the clonal expansion period: (a) a well-synchronized first round of the cell cycle; and (b) a not very synchronized second round of the cell cycle (Fig. 1, A-C). By delaying or omitting the addition of insulin during differentiation induction, mitotic clonal expansion could be delayed or completely prevented (Fig. 2, A and B). However, there was still normal adipocyte differentiation under these conditions (Figs. 2 and 3). Thus, mitotic clonal expansion and adipocyte differentiation are two separable events. Importantly, the identification of insulin as the hormone responsible for inducing mitotic clonal expansion (Fig. 1, D and E) indicated that the IGF-I receptor was the important factor responsible for activation of mitotic clonal expansion because insulin acts through the IGF-I receptor in 3T3-L1 cell differentiation induction (12, 16, 17). During the induction of adipocyte differentiation, IGF-I receptor tyrosine kinase signaling was very important. Without the addition of insulin in differentiation induction, 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation was only about half of the differentiation induced with insulin (Fig. 3). The small amount of hormones, such as insulin and IGF-I, present in the culture medium (containing fetal bovine serum) might also contribute some of this differentiation. Thus, the identification of insulin as the inducer for mitotic clonal expansion indicated that the IGF-I receptor was the important signal initiator for both mitotic clonal expansion and adipocyte differentiation. Based on our previous (12) and present results, it is likely that the IGF-I receptor activates two signal pathways, which lead to the mitotic clonal expansion and adipocyte differentiation separately.

It has been reported that in subconfluent 3T3-L1 preadipocytes, PD98059, a MEK-1 inhibitor, blocks thymidine incorporation and accelerates adipocyte differentiation (21). Our results with PD98059 treatment in postconfluent 3T3-L1 preadipocyte differentiation induction indicated that PD98059 blocked mitotic clonal expansion during differentiation induction, whereas adipocyte differentiation was not affected (Fig. 4). This is just the opposite of the effect of vanadate, which blocks adipocyte differentiation without affecting mitotic clonal expansion (11, 12). Vanadate blocks adipocyte differentiation by inhibiting the turnover of IGF-I receptor tyrosine kinase phosphorylated c-Crk, therefore blocking the c-Crk-mediated differentiation induction signal (12). On the other hand, PD98059 blocked mitotic clonal expansion by inhibiting the activation of MAP kinase (Erk1 and Erk2) by MEK-1 (Fig. 5). Because the activation of Erk1 and Erk2 is important for cell proliferation, inhibition of Erk1 and Erk2 will inevitably affect cell division. Our observation that PD98059 did not affect adipocyte differentiation is consistent with reports by other investigators (21, 22). In fact, there is evidence that Erk1 and Erk2 MAP kinase activation is not necessary for but antagonizes 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation (22). As expected, vanadate (a tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor), which did not affect mitotic clonal expansion but blocked adipocyte differentiation, had no effect on the activation of Erk1 and Erk2 (Fig. 5). Taken together, these results indicate that the IGF-I receptor tyrosine kinase activated by the high concentration of insulin stimulates at least two signal pathways. One pathway leads to the activation of Erk1 and Erk2, which is essential for mitotic clonal expansion, whereas the other pathway, through the adapter molecule c-Crk that is inhibited by vanadate, leads to the adipocyte differentiation.


    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Research Grants 39825107 (to K. L.) and 39825115 (to J. W.) from the Chinese National Nature Sciences Foundation, Research Grant G1999053901 (to J. W.) from the Major State Basic Research Program of China, Grant 98XD14015 (to J. W.) from the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality, Research Grant 9910 (to K. L. and J. W.) from the Shanghai-Unilever Research and Development Foundation, and grants (to K. L. and J. W.) from the Chinese Academy of Sciences.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence may be addressed: Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 320 Yueyang Rd., Shanghai, China 200031. Tel.: 86-21-64374430, ext. 5299 or 5298; Fax: 86-21-64338357; E-mail: kliao@sunm.shcnc.ac.cn (K. L.) or wujr@sunm.shcnc.ac.cn (J. W.).

Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 16, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M011729200


    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: IGF-I, insulin-like growth factor I; MIX, 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine; DEX, dexamethasone; MDI, 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine, dexamethasone, and insulin; FBS, fetal bovine serum; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; BrdUrd, bromodeoxyuridine; DAPI, 4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase; Erk, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; MAP, mitogen-activated protein; MD, 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine and dexamethasone.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES


1. Gregoire, F. M., Smas, C. M., and Sul, H. S. (1998) Physiol. Rev. 78, 783-809[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Spiegelman, B. M., and Flier, J. S. (1996) Cell 87, 377-389[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. MacDougald, O. M., and Lane, M. D. (1995) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 64, 345-373[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Mackall, J. C., Student, A. K., Polakis, S. E., and Lane, M. D. (1976) J. Biol. Chem. 251, 6462-6464[Abstract]
5. Rosen, O. M., Smith, C. J., Hirsch, A., Lai, E., and Rubin, C. S. (1979) Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 35, 477-499[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Student, A. K., Hsu, R. Y., and Lane, M. D. (1980) J. Biol. Chem. 255, 4745-4750[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Reichert, M., and Eick, D. (1999) Oncogene 18, 459-466[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Yeh, W., Bierer, B. E., and McKnight, S. L. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 11086-11090[Abstract]
9. Patel, Y. M., and Lane, M. D. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 17653-17660[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Lyle, R. E., Richon, V. M., and McGehee, R. E., Jr. (1998) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 247, 373-378[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Liao, K., and Lane, M. D. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 12123-12132[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Jin, S., Zhai, B., Qiu, Z., Wu, J., Lane, M. D., and Liao, K. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 34344-34352[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Entenmann, G., and Hauner, H. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 270, C1011-C1016[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Reed, B. C., and Lane, M. D. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 77, 285-289[Abstract]
15. Laemmli, V. D. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Smith, P. J., Wise, L. S., Berkowitz, R., Wan, C., and Rubin, C. S. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 9402-9408[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Schmidt, W., Poll-Jordan, G., and Loffler, G. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 15489-15495[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Lazar, D. F., Wiese, R. J., Brady, M. J., Mastick, C. C., Waters, S. B., Yamauchi, K., Pessin, J. E., Cuatrecasas, P., and Saltiel, A. R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 20801-20807[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Pang, L., Sawada, T., Decker, S. J., and Saltiel, A. R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13585-13588[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Kim, B., Leventhal, P. S., Saltiel, A. R., and Feldman, E. L. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 21268-21273[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Boney, C. M., Gruppuso, P. A., Faris, R. A., and Frackelton, A. R., Jr. (2000) Mol. Endocrinol. 14, 805-813[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Font, D. E., Mora, J., Porras, A., Ahn, N., and Santos, E. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 6068-6075[Abstract]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.