Overexpression of gamma -Sarcoglycan Induces Severe Muscular Dystrophy

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE REGULATION OF SARCOGLYCAN ASSEMBLY*

Xiaolei ZhuDagger §, Michele HadhazyDagger , Margaret E. GrohDagger , Matthew T. Wheeler, Robert Wollmann||, and Elizabeth M. McNallyDagger **

From the Dagger  Department of Medicine, Section of Cardiology, and Department of Human Genetics,  Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, and || Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637

Received for publication, March 1, 2001, and in revised form, March 30, 2001


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The sarcoglycan complex is found normally at the plasma membrane of muscle. Disruption of the sarcoglycan complex, through primary gene mutations in dystrophin or sarcoglycan subunits, produces membrane instability and muscular dystrophy. Restoration of the sarcoglycan complex at the plasma membrane requires reintroduction of the mutant sarcoglycan subunit in a manner that will permit normal assembly of the entire sarcoglycan complex. To study sarcoglycan gene replacement, we introduced transgenes expressing murine gamma -sarcoglycan into muscle of normal mice. Mice expressing high levels of gamma -sarcoglycan, under the control of the muscle-specific creatine kinase promoter, developed a severe muscular dystrophy with greatly reduced muscle mass and early lethality. Marked gamma -sarcoglycan overexpression produced cytoplasmic aggregates that interfered with normal membrane targeting of gamma -sarcoglycan. Overexpression of gamma -sarcoglycan lead to the up-regulation of alpha - and beta -sarcoglycan. These data suggest that increased gamma -sarcoglycan and/or mislocalization of gamma -sarcoglycan to the cytoplasm is sufficient to induce muscle damage and provides a new model of muscular dystrophy that highlights the importance of this protein in the assembly, function, and downstream signaling of the sarcoglycan complex. Most importantly, gene dosage and promoter strength should be given serious consideration in replacement gene therapy to ensure safety in human clinical trials.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Muscular dystrophy is a genetically heterogeneous disease, but loss of function mutations in the genes encoding the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex (DGC)1 contribute significantly to the muscular dystrophy phenotype. Therapy aimed at restoring the missing proteins in muscle has been initiated in humans with these disorders (1). Sarcoglycan is a subcomplex within the DGC, and mutations in alpha -, beta -, gamma -, and delta -sarcoglycan genes have been described (2). Most sarcoglycan gene mutations destabilize the entire sarcoglycan complex at the plasma membrane of muscle myofibers and cardiomyocytes (3-7). Expression of dystrophin and sarcoglycans seems to be tightly regulated. Primary mutations in dystrophin lead to drastic reduction of dystrophin-associated proteins including sarcoglycans (8-10).

Replacement of missing DGC components can be achieved with transgenesis or viral-based approaches to evaluate the assembly and function of the DGC. Transgene-mediated expression of dystrophin in the mdx mouse, a mouse model for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), eliminates dystrophic symptoms (11), and transgenic rescue of dystrophin expression has been used to identify structure-function relationships within the DGC. In these studies, expression or overexpression of dystrophin from the tissue-specific muscle creatine kinase (MCK) promoter was not associated with toxicity (11). However, less is known about sarcoglycan replacement, and unlike dystrophin, the sarcoglycans are transmembrane proteins that assemble within the secretory pathway. Restoration of proper targeting and assembly of the sarcoglycans may involve additional regulatory aspects than those required for expression of cytoplasmic proteins.

Adeno- and adeno-associated viruses carrying normal genes have been successfully used to rescue skeletal muscle defects in mice lacking dystrophin or sarcoglycans (12-15). These studies describe the efficiency of protein expression as well as the immune response generated by the introduction of the transfer viruses and the vectors carrying the gene. The dose response of treatment, including studies of the minimally effective dose and the potential for toxicity related to overexpression, has not yet been explored fully. With the initiation of phase I clinical trials using gene therapy for limb girdle muscular dystrophies (1), it is extremely important to determine the risks and benefits of this potentially very powerful approach.

In this study, we generated transgenic mice expressing different levels of gamma -sarcoglycan under the control of the MCK promoter. We found that mice carrying a high copy number of the gamma -sarcoglycan gene, concomitant with marked overexpression of gamma -sarcoglycan protein, showed profound muscular dystrophy as revealed by extreme muscle wasting and premature death. Histopathology showed muscular dystrophy with variable fiber size, centrally placed nuclei, and increased fibrosis. In addition, fast fibers seem to be preferentially affected. In muscle overexpressing gamma -sarcoglycan, we found that gamma -sarcoglycan failed to reach the cell membrane and was associated with intracellular aggregates. The remaining sarcoglycan subunits were targeted to the sarcolemma; however, alpha - and beta -sarcoglycans were significantly up-regulated at the muscle membrane. These findings suggest that overexpression of gamma -sarcoglycan and misregulation of alpha - and beta -sarcoglycan can cause muscular dystrophy.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Generation of MCKgsg Transgenic Mice-- Full-length mouse gamma -sarcoglycan (nucleotides 152-1027 of GenBankTM accession number AF282901) was obtained using mouse skeletal muscle cDNA as template and amplified with the following primer pairs: gsgF, 5'-AGAAGCTTGCCATGGTTCGAGAGCAGTAC-3'; gsgR, 5'-TAGGATCCTCAAAGACAGACGTGGCTG-3'. The polymerase chain reaction product was digested with HindIII and BamHI. The digested polymerase chain reaction product was then ligated to the pBluescript II KS (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) that was treated with HindIII and BamHI. Polyadenylation and termination signals of bovine growth hormone from pcDNA3 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) were added at the XbaI site. Muscle-specific creatine kinase promoter was amplified with the following primer pairs: MCK-F, 5'-ATCTCGAGCAGCTGAGGTGCAAAAGGCT-3' and MCK-R, 5'-ATAAGCTTGGGGGCAGCCCCTGTGCCCC-3' (16). The resultant 1.35-kb fragment was inserted into the XhoI and HindIII sites. Sequences were verified using cycle sequencing. After digestion with BssHII, the prokaryotic vector was separated from the transgene by sucrose gradient (17). Transgenic mice were generated by microinjection of transgene DNA into the pronucleus of fertilized single-cell BL6/DBA embryos as previously described (18, 19).

Southern, Northern, and Immunoblot Analysis-- The MCKgsg transgene was detected in transgenic mice by Southern blot analysis of tail DNA with alpha -32P-labeled DNA probe containing the full-length gamma -sarcoglycan coding region (nucleotides 152-1027 of GenBankTM accession number AF282901). Genomic DNA was predigested with BamHI and HindIII. Signal strength was quantified using ImageQuant software and a STORM 860 phosphorimager (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Transgene copy number was determined by comparing the gamma -sarcoglycan transgene and endogenous gamma -sarcoglycan gene. MCKgsg mRNA expression was detected with the same full-length gamma -sarcoglycan probe as described above. The following probes to murine sarcoglycan sequences were also used: alpha -sarcoglycan cDNA coding region (nucleotides 254-1417, GenBankTM accession number AB024920); beta -sarcoglycan partial cDNA coding region (nucleotides 325-834, GenBankTM accession number AB024921). Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Inc.). Fifteen µg of total RNA was loaded in each lane. For protein analysis, 50 µg of total protein was resolved on a 4-12% Tris-glycine gradient gel (Invitrogen BV/NOVEX, Groningen, Netherlands). Immunoblotting was performed using the following primary antibodies: monoclonal anti-alpha - and -beta -sarcoglycan antibodies (NovoCastro Laboratories, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK), polyclonal anti-gamma - and -delta -sarcoglycans (6), polyclonal anti-dystrophin antibody (7), and monoclonal anti-myosin heavy chain antibody (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, University of Iowa, IA). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit and goat anti-mouse secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) were used.

Histology and Immunocytochemistry-- Muscles (gastrocnemius together with soleus and quadriceps) and hearts from 6-week-old mice were isolated and weighed. 10-µm sections were fixed in methanol for immunostaining or in 10% formalin for hematoxylin/eosin or Masson trichrome staining. Primary antibodies were the same for immunoblotting analysis except polyclonal anti-beta -sarcoglycan antibody (7) was used. Fluorescein isothiocyanate- or Cy3-conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) was used. Counterstaining with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) was included in the mounting medium (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Images were acquired on AxioCam and analyzed with AxioVision 2.0 (Carl Zeiss, Inc., Thornwood, NY).

Staining for Ca2+-dependent ATPase Activity-- Fiber types (fast and slow fibers) were distinguished using the procedure as described previously (20). An alkaline preincubation at pH 9.4 was used.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Generation of Transgenic Mice Overexpressing gamma -Sarcoglycan-- The MCKgsg transgene was engineered by placing the full-length mouse gamma -sarcoglycan cDNA sequence under the control of the 1.35-kb MCK promoter (16) followed by bovine growth hormone termination and polyadenylation signals (Fig. 1A). To assess the potential toxicity of high level gamma -sarcoglycan expression, four lines of transgenic mice were selected for this study. Two lines carried low copy numbers of the transgene, and two lines carried high copy numbers of the transgene. Using a full-length gamma -sarcoglycan cDNA sequence as a probe, MCKgsg lines 1 and 3 carried approximately three and four copies, respectively, when compared with the endogenous gamma -sarcoglycan gene (Fig. 1B) and are considered low copy transgenic mice. MCKgsg lines 2 and 4, considered as high copy transgenic mice, carried ~57 and 36 copies of the gamma -sarcoglycan gene, respectively, relative to the endogenous gene (Fig. 1B, asterisk). Northern blot analysis showed the transgenic gamma -sarcoglycan mRNA at the predicted size of 1.3 kb (Fig. 1C, arrow). MCKgsg line 2 (high copy) exhibited more mRNA expression than MCKgsg line 1 (low copy), and both showed considerably more mRNA than the endogenous 1.6-kb gamma -sarcoglycan mRNA (Fig. 1C, asterisk). The MCK promoter expressed gamma -sarcoglycan mRNA in both cardiac and skeletal muscle, although lower levels of mRNA expression were seen in cardiac muscle (Fig. 1C). Immunoblot analysis showed that gamma -sarcoglycan protein expression correlated with gene copy number in that high copy number transgenic lines expressed substantially greater amounts of gamma -sarcoglycan protein (Fig. 1D, lanes 6 and 9 for MCKgsg lines 2 and 4, respectively). A serial dilution of protein extract from transgenic muscle showed that MCKgsg lines 2 and 4 expressed a 150- and 200-fold increase in the amount of gamma -sarcoglycan protein, respectively, when compared with wild type, whereas lines 1 and 3 expressed ~3- and 5-fold more, respectively (Fig. 1D).


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Overexpression of gamma -sarcoglycan in transgenic mice. A, the construct for the MCKgsg transgene. A 1.35-kb MCK promoter was used to drive expression of the full-length murine gamma -sarcoglycan (gsg) sequence. Bovine growth hormone (BGH) termination and polyadenylation (poly(A)) sites were added at the 3' end. Restriction sites used to engineer the construct are also shown. B, Southern blot analysis of BamHI- and HindIII-double digested DNA from transgenic mice carrying low and high copy numbers of the MCKgsg transgene. Both transgene (arrow) and endogenous gamma -sarcoglycan gene (asterisk) are indicated. C, Northern blot analysis shows mRNA expression from the endogenous gamma -sarcoglycan locus (asterisk) and from the transgene (arrow). Lines 2 and 3 were used in this analysis where line 3 represents a low copy number transgenic line and line 2 represents a high copy number line. Expression is shown from quadriceps (Q), gastrocnemius (G), and heart (H). The total amount of RNA in each lane was determined to be comparable by ethidium bromide staining of the 28 S and 18 S ribosomal RNA (data not shown). D, immunoblot analysis of gamma -sarcoglycan overexpression in MCKgsg transgenic lines. Lines 2 and 4 are the high copy number lines, and lines 1 and 3 are the low copy number lines. Expression of gamma -sarcoglycan is the expected 35-kDa size. For lines 2 and 4, the extracts were diluted to compare relative amounts. hi, high copy; low, low copy; wt, wild type.

Marked Overexpression of gamma -Sarcoglycan Produces Severe and Rapidly Progressive, Lethal Muscular Dystrophy-- Of the four independent founder lines and their wild type littermate controls, the two high copy MCKgsg transgenic mice were found to be significantly smaller than their wild type littermates and the low copy number MCKgsg transgenic lines. A representative comparison of a high copy transgenic (MCKgsg line 4) and a normal littermate control mouse is shown in Fig. 2, top panel. Mice from MCKgsg lines 2 and 4 (high copy) were less active and displayed an abnormal gait that was characterized by widened hind limb spacing. We examined skeletal muscles from MCKgsg high copy mice, MCKgsg low copy mice, and wild type littermate controls. Hind limb from MCKgsg line 4 was visibly dystrophic with marked muscle wasting and gross fibrofatty replacement when compared with wild type mice (Fig. 2, top panel, right side). Muscle mass of individual quadriceps in MCKgsg lines 2 and 4 (0.07 and 0.05 g, respectively) was significantly lower when compared with two control littermates (0.16 and 0.14 g). Similar findings were observed in fore limbs of high copy MCKgsg lines 2 and 4 (data not shown).


View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Transgenic mice overexpressing gamma -sarcoglycan and histopathology in MCKgsg transgenic mice. Shown in the top panel is a mouse from MCKgsg line 4 next to a wild type littermate control. Dissected lower limbs from the same MCKgsg line 4 and the littermate control are shown on the right. hi, high copy; wt, wild type. Representative pathology is shown with hematoxylin/eosin staining in the left panels (A, C, E, and G) and Masson trichrome staining in the right panels (B, D, F, and H). A and B, quadriceps muscle from high copy MCKgsg line 4. C and D, similar sections from a low copy number MCKgsg line 1. E and F, normal control muscle sections. G and H, muscle sections from a gamma -sarcoglycan-null mutant.

The marked muscle wasting was associated with premature death. Two independent high copy founders from MCKgsg line 2 and MCKgsg line 4 died at day 45 and day 110, respectively. Given the limited survival of the male founder for MCKgsg line 2, we attempted to propagate this line through in vitro fertilization but were unsuccessful. The female founder for MCKgsg line 4 reproduced once. The progeny from MCKgsg line 4 died prematurely and did not reproduce. Thus, neither high copy line was successfully maintained because of the lethal nature of the overexpression of gamma -sarcoglycan. We generated an intermediate high copy number line, MCKgsg line 5, with a copy number of ~29. These mice also displayed small size and abnormal gait similar to the MCKgsg lines 2 and 4. Propagation of MCKgsg line 5 was similarly limited.

Histologic analysis of muscles from high copy transgenic mice (MCKgsg line 4) using hematoxylin/eosin and Masson trichrome staining showed severe dystrophic changes, including wide variation in fiber size, an inflammatory infiltrate, increased connective tissue, and adipocyte replacement of myofibers (Fig. 2, A and B). Abundant central nuclei were also evident in the dystrophic muscle (Fig. 2A). Muscle from MCKgsg line 3, a low copy number line, appeared normal (Fig. 2, C and D) when compared with wild type control muscle (Fig. 2, E and F). The dystrophic phenotype of muscles from high copy transgenic mice was very similar to that seen in a gamma -sarcoglycan-null mutant (7) (Fig. 2, G and H).

Overexpression Inhibits Normal Cellular Targeting of gamma -Sarcoglycan to the Plasma Membrane-- gamma -Sarcoglycan is an integral part of the membrane-associated sarcoglycan complex. Because of the similar histologic appearance of high copy MCKgsg transgenic muscle and gamma -sarcoglycan-null mutant muscle (7), we examined gamma -sarcoglycan localization in gastrocnemius muscle from normal mice and MCKgsg line 2. Despite a high level of gamma -sarcoglycan protein expression, gamma -sarcoglycan protein failed to target appropriately to the cell membrane (Fig. 3A). The majority of immunoreactive gamma -sarcoglycan protein was detected as punctate staining throughout the cytoplasm of the myofibers and was excluded from nuclei (arrowhead). Similar findings were observed in gastrocnemius muscle from MCKgsg line 4 (data not shown). Muscles from low copy MCKgsg transgenic mice were similar to wild type control muscle with normal gamma -sarcoglycan localization at the plasma membrane (Fig. 3, B and C). Although a small amount of cytoplasmic gamma -sarcoglycan protein was seen, this was not toxic to muscle given the normal histology (Figs. 2C and 3B).


View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Expression of gamma -sarcoglycan in MCKgsg transgenic mice. A, expression of gamma -sarcoglycan in quadriceps muscle from high copy number MCKgsg mice (line 4). The arrow indicates that gamma -sarcoglycan immunostaining is not found in nuclei. B, gamma -sarcoglycan staining in low copy number MCKgsg muscle (line 3). C, normal control.

Lack of gamma -sarcoglycan expression at the cell membrane and increased intracellular gamma -sarcoglycan altered the expression of the remaining sarcoglycans in a manner different from loss of function mutations. The genetic loss of gamma -sarcoglycan is accompanied by reduced protein expression at the plasma membrane of the residual sarcoglycans despite their normal mRNA levels (4, 7). Because high level gamma -sarcoglycan expression similarly results in loss of gamma -sarcoglycan at the cell membrane, we expected that reduced levels of the other sarcoglycan proteins may be present. Instead, the increased cytoplasmic expression of gamma -sarcoglycan from MCKgsg line 2 (high copy) resulted in up-regulation of alpha - and beta -sarcoglycans (Fig. 4, A and C) when compared with wild type (Fig. 4, B and D). Of note, some beta -sarcoglycan was found in a punctate pattern in the cytoplasm (Fig. 4C) suggesting that it may be aggregated with gamma -sarcoglycan. Normal levels of delta -sarcoglycan and dystrophin were present in MCKgsg line 2 mice (Fig. 4, E and G). These data suggest that increased cytoplasmic gamma -sarcoglycan may be toxic to myofibers and sufficient to cause muscular dystrophy. Mislocalization of the remaining sarcoglycans is not required for the development of muscular dystrophy, but abnormal assembly of the sarcoglycans may contribute to the development of muscle degeneration.


View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Expression of DGC proteins in gamma -sarcoglycan-overexpressing mice. Quadriceps muscle from MCKgsg line 4 (A, C, E, and G) and normal controls (B, D, F, and H) were stained for components of the DGC. Shown in A and B is staining for alpha -sarcoglycan. C and D represent beta -sarcoglycan staining. delta -Sarcoglycan (E and F) and dystrophin (G and H) are also shown. I, Western blot analysis of alpha -, beta -, and delta -sarcoglycans (alpha -sg, beta -sg, and delta -sg), dystrophin (dyst), and myosin in MCKgsg high copy lines (lines 2 and 4), a low copy line (line1), and a wild type control (wt). Coomassie blue (CB) staining is shown as a loading control. J, Northern blot analysis of alpha - and beta -sarcoglycan in MCKgsg high copy line (line 4) and wild type control. Ribosomal RNA is shown as a loading control.

Immunoblot analysis confirmed the up-regulation of alpha - and beta -sarcoglycan. alpha - and beta -Sarcoglycans were significantly up-regulated in muscle from the MCKgsg high copy lines (lines 2 and 4) compared with MCKgsg line 1, a low copy number line and wild type littermate muscle (Fig. 4I). delta -Sarcoglycan and dystrophin levels were not significantly changed by overexpression of gamma -sarcoglycan at any level. Surprisingly, myosin expression appeared reduced in the high copy MCKgsg transgenic muscles suggesting that cytoplasmic gamma -sarcoglycan expression may disrupt sarcomeric function. At the light microscopic level, sarcomeres did not appear disrupted in MCKgsg line 2 (data not shown).

To determine whether up-regulation of alpha - and beta -sarcoglycans is accompanied by an increase in alpha - or beta -sarcoglycan mRNA, we compared the mRNA expression in muscle from MCKgsg high copy transgenic and wild type mice. alpha -Sarcoglycan mRNA in MCKgsg line 4 was similar to that in wild type (Fig. 4J, top panel), suggesting that up-regulation of alpha -sarcoglycan is related to an inability of myocytes to regulate stoichiometric ratios at the sarcolemma. beta -Sarcoglycan mRNA exists as three isoforms (4.4, 3.0, and 1.4 kb) that are thought to encode the same protein. We found that the 3.0- and 1.4-kb fragments were increased, whereas the 4.4-kb fragment was decreased (Fig. 4J, middle panel). It is possible that these alternative splicing forms may regulate the overall mRNA and consequently beta -sarcoglycan protein expression. Thus, multiple factors might be involved in the mechanism underlying the up-regulation of beta -sarcoglycan protein.

Fast Fibers Are Preferentially Affected-- Muscle fibers respond to damage differently depending on their fiber types. It was shown that fast muscle fibers are preferentially affected in DMD (21). We examined how fiber types respond differently in muscular dystrophy mediated by gamma -sarcoglycan overexpression under the control of the MCK promoter. We examined limb muscles from MCKgsg high copy mice and compared soleus (predominantly slow) to gastrocnemius (predominantly fast) muscle for ATPase activity. Fig. 5 shows both soleus (lower right portion of each muscle section) and gastrocnemius (upper left portion). Compared with normal muscles (Fig. 5A), muscles from MCKgsg line 2 (Fig. 5B) showed pervasive degeneration in areas, such as the gastrocnemius, where fast fibers are concentrated. Only the fast fibers in the soleus of MCKgsg line 2 showed overt degeneration. In MCKgsg line 2, slow fibers, seen abundantly in the soleus, showed less damage. Soleus also showed an increased percentage of slow fibers, consistent with their decreased susceptibility to muscular dystrophy and decreased level of the MCK promoter-directed gamma -sarcoglycan overexpression. It was previously shown that the MCK promoter directed dystrophin protein expression at a level 3-4 times higher in fast fibers than in slow fibers (22). It is possible that reduced expression of MCKgsg may occur, accounting for some of the protection of slow skeletal fibers.


View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Fast fibers are preferentially affected by marked overexpression of gamma -sarcoglycan. ATPase patterns indicate slow (light) and fast (dark) fibers. The lower right of each panel represents soleus (slow) muscle, and the upper left is gastrocnemius (fast) muscle. A, normal. B, MCKgsg line 2. Note preservation of slow fibers.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Disruption of the DGC is responsible for a number of genetically distinct forms of muscular dystrophy. This includes mutations in the dystrophin gene that cause DMD and mutations in the sarcoglycan genes that cause the limb girdle muscular dystrophies (2, 23). Many of these mutations are thought to produce disruption of the DGC by loss of function or loss of protein expression. Because mice null for sarcoglycan genes have been generated (6, 7) and these mice fully recapitulate the membrane instability and other features of human muscular dystrophy, we generated mice expressing gamma -sarcoglycan to study replacement approaches for the sarcoglycan gene products.

For these transgenic studies, we used the MCK promoter to drive high level, striated muscle-specific expression. We selected the MCK promoter because it has been used extensively in transgenic gene replacement studies of dystrophin (11). We found a profound, lethal muscle wasting disorder developed in transgenic mice that had high level overexpression of murine gamma -sarcoglycan. These mice typically died within 2-3 months of age, were markedly reduced in size, and displayed limited mobility. In the high level gamma -sarcoglycan-overexpressing mice, we noted that fast fibers were preferentially affected. This may be consistent with fiber type specificity of the MCK promoter (22) or may be related to observations made in DMD muscle where fast fibers are more sensitive to damage (21). Lower levels of gamma -sarcoglycan expression from the same MCK promoter were not associated with muscle damage. The lower levels of expression seen in the hearts of these transgenic animals resulted in near normal gamma -sarcoglycan expression and no evidence of toxicity or damage (data not shown) and suggests that lethality associated with gamma -sarcoglycan overexpression is related to skeletal muscle toxicity. Because cardiomyopathy typically develops later in mice with sarcoglycan gene mutations (6, 7), the premature death in MCKgsg high copy transgenic mice may have limited our ability to detect cardiomyopathy.

The high level of gamma -sarcoglycan expression resulting from the MCKgsg transgenes produced several molecular consequences. Overexpression of gamma -sarcoglycan resulted in reduced gamma -sarcoglycan at the plasma membrane of myofibers. Loss of gamma -sarcoglycan expression at the membrane is found in DMD and sarcoglycan-mediated muscular dystrophies. Indeed, a human muscular dystrophy patient carrying the common Delta 521-T founder mutation was described who maintained expression of alpha -, beta -, and delta -sarcoglycan and preferentially displayed reduced gamma -sarcoglycan (24). Thus, the loss of gamma -sarcoglycan at the plasma membrane of myofibers is likely a contributor to the pathogenesis seen in this overexpression model. A second consequence of gamma -sarcoglycan overexpression was the accumulation of gamma -sarcoglycan immunoreactive aggregates in the cytoplasm of myofibers. Because the sarcoglycan complex is associated with both mechanical and signaling functions (25), mislocalization of gamma -sarcoglycan in the cytoplasm could lead to abnormal signaling or alteration of cytoskeletal elements that interact with the gamma -sarcoglycan. In its cytoplasmic domain, gamma -sarcoglycan interacts with a muscle-specific form of filamin (gamma -filamin or filamin 2), and loss of gamma -sarcoglycan produces an increased plasma membrane gamma -filamin level (26). Once antibodies that recognize murine gamma -filamin are available, it will be interesting to determine whether filamin localization is altered in gamma -sarcoglycan-overexpressing mice. A third consequence of marked gamma -sarcoglycan expression is the increased expression of alpha - and beta -sarcoglycan. Up-regulation of alpha -sarcoglycan is possibly due to an inability to regulate protein assembly at the sarcolemma. However, regulation at both transcription level as well as protein level may be responsible for the up-regulation of beta -sarcoglycan. The increase in these proteins likely produces abnormal sarcoglycan complexes that, in turn, may produce muscular dystrophy. The aberrant ratio of sarcoglycans may cause abnormal mechanical and signaling functions that may be pathologic to the muscle.

Despite the similar histology between gamma -sarcoglycan overexpression-mediated muscular dystrophy and muscular dystrophy caused by dystrophin- or gamma -sarcoglycan-null mutation, disparities exist. In muscle degeneration where sarcoglycan is absent, instability of the muscle membrane is demonstrated by increased permeability. Normal muscle is impermeable to Evans blue dye, a small molecular weight vital tracer. Mutations in dystrophin or sarcoglycan lead to abnormal membrane permeability, and Evans blue dye uptake is a significant feature of the membrane defect in mdx and gamma -sarcoglycan mutants (7, 27, 28). We were able to assess Evans blue dye uptake in MCKgsg line 5 (copy number 29) and found no evidence for Evans blue dye uptake (data not shown). The expression and membrane localization of the remaining sarcoglycan subunits in gamma -sarcoglycan-overexpressing muscle likely has a protective effect on membrane permeability that is absent in gamma -sarcoglycan-null muscle (7). Thus, although overexpression of gamma -sarcoglycan leads to muscular dystrophy, the mechanism by which this muscular dystrophy develops likely differs from gamma -sarcoglycan deficiency.

Transgenic rescue of dystrophin deficiency in the mdx mouse has been used to demonstrate that dystrophin replacement is effective (11, 22). This approach has been highly illustrative to delineate structure-function relationships within dystrophin and its interaction with the remainder of the DGC (11). Furthermore, overexpression of utrophin, the highly related dystrophin homolog, also can fully rescue the dystrophic phenotype in the mdx mouse (29). In these studies, the same MCK promoter was used but did not result in myofiber toxicity as seen here for gamma -sarcoglycan overexpression. This suggests that the skeletal myocyte has different mechanisms for the maintenance of stoichiometric ratios of the different components of the DGC.

These studies highlight the complexity of simple gene replacement strategies and underscore the importance of animal models for the treatment of human disease. Because viral replacement strategies typically lead to high level and often variable levels of expression throughout the transduced tissue, it is likely that some toxicity is occurring in those myofibers that have been transduced at high levels. Moreover, previous viral replacement studies, although critically important in demonstrating that replacement can be effective, have not explored fully the dose response of treatment that includes studies of the minimally effective dose and the potential for toxicity related to overexpression. Because viral replacement gene therapy trials are being initiated in humans (1), thorough testing in animal models is required to document the full range of benefits and the potential risks and toxicity.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Donna Fackenthal, Josephine M. Y. Lam, and Kelly Smith for technical assistance, Mike Allikian and Ahlke Heydemann for proofreading the manuscript, and members of the McNally laboratory for helpful discussions. The monoclonal anti-myosin antibody developed by H. M. Blau was obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank maintained by the University of Iowa.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Supported by National Research Service Award HL10288.

** Supported by Muscular Dystrophy Association, National Institutes of Health Grant HL61322; a Charles Culpeper Medical Scholar. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Section of Cardiology, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland, MC 6088, Chicago, IL 60637. Tel.: 773-702-2672; Fax: 773-702-2681; E-mail: emcnally@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 3, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M101877200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: DGC, dystrophin-glycoprotein complex; DMD, Duchenne muscular dystrophy; MCK, muscle creatine kinase; kb, kilobase pair(s); gsg, gamma -sarcoglycan.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Stedman, H., Wilson, J. M., Finke, R., Kleckner, A. L., and Mendell, J. (2000) Hum. Gene Ther. 11, 777-790[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Zatz, M., Vainzof, M., and Passos-Bueno, M. R. (2000) Curr. Opin. Neurol. 13, 511-517[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Lim, L. E., Duclos, F., Broux, O., Bourg, N., Sunada, Y., Allamand, V., Meyer, J., Richard, I., Moomaw, C., Slaughter, C., Tomé, F. M. S., Fardeau, M., Jackson, C. E., Beckmann, J. S., and Campbell, K. P. (1995) Nat. Genet. 11, 257-265[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Noguchi, S., McNally, E. M., Ben Othmane, K., Hagiwara, Y., Mizuno, Y., Yoshida, M., Yamamoto, H., Bonnemann, C. G., Gussoni, E., Denton, P. H., Kyriakides, T., Middleton, L., Hentati, F., Ben Hamida, M., Nonaka, I., Vance, J. M., Kunkel, L. M., and Ozawa, E. (1995) Science 270, 819-822[Abstract]
5. Bonnemann, C. G., Modi, R., Noguchi, S., Mizuno, Y., Yoshida, M., Gussoni, E., McNally, E. M., Duggan, D. J., Angelini, C., and Hoffman, E. P. (1995) Nat. Genet. 11, 266-273[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Hack, A. A., Lam, M. Y., Cordier, L., Shoturma, D. I., Ly, C. T., Hadhazy, M. A., Hadhazy, M. R., Sweeney, H. L., and McNally, E. M. (2000) J. Cell Sci. 113, 2535-2544[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Hack, A. A., Ly, C. T., Jiang, F., Clendenin, C. J., Sigrist, K. S., Wollmann, R. L., and McNally, E. M. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 142, 1279-1287[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Ohlendieck, K., Matsumura, K., Ionasescu, V. V., Towbin, J. A., Bosch, E. P., Weinstein, S. L., Sernett, S. W., and Campbell, K. P. (1993) Neurology 43, 795-800[Abstract]
9. Matsumura, K., Tome, F. M., Ionasescu, V., Ervasti, J. M., Anderson, R. D., Romero, N. B., Simon, D., Recan, D., Kaplan, J. C., Fardeau, M., and Campbell, K. P. (1993) J. Clin. Invest. 92, 866-871[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Matsumura, K., Ervasti, J. M., Ohlendieck, K., Kahl, S. D., and Campbell, K. P. (1992) Nature 360, 588-591[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Cox, G. A., Cole, N. M., Matsumura, K., Phelps, S. F., Hauschka, S. D., Campbell, K. P., Faulkner, J. A., and Chamberlain, J. S. (1993) Nature 364, 725-729[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Cordier, L., Hack, A. A., Scott, M. O., Barton-Davis, E. R., Gao, G., Wilson, J. M., McNally, E. M., and Sweeney, H. L. (2000) Mol. Ther. 1, 119-129[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Vincent, N., Ragot, T., Gilgenkrantz, H., Couton, D., Chafey, P., Gregoire, A., Briand, P., Kaplan, J. C., Kahn, A., and Perricaudet, M. (1993) Nat. Genet. 5, 130-134[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Ragot, T., Vincent, N., Chafey, P., Vigne, E., Gilgenkrantz, H., Couton, D., Cartaud, J., Briand, P., Kaplan, J. C., Perricaudet, M., and Kahn, A. (1993) Nature 361, 647-650[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Holt, K. H., Lim, L. E., Straub, V., Venzke, D. P., Duclos, F., Anderson, R. D., Davidson, B. L., and Campbell, K. P. (1998) Mol. Cell 1, 841-848[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Larochelle, N., Lochmuller, H., Zhao, J., Jani, A., Hallauer, P., Hastings, K. E., Massie, B., Prescott, S., Petrof, B. J., Karpati, G., and Nalbantoglu, J. (1997) Gene Ther. 4, 465-472[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Kim, S., Lin, H., Barr, E., Chu, L., Leiden, J. M., and Parmacek, M. S. (1997) J. Clin. Invest. 100, 1006-1014[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Hogan, B., Beddington, R., Costantini, F., and Lacy, E. (1994) Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed. , pp. 115-126, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, NY
19. Zhu, X., Hadhazy, M., Wehling, M., Tidball, J. G., and McNally, E. M. (2000) FEBS Lett. 474, 71-75[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Punkt, K., Krug, H., and Bohme, R. (1987) Acta Histochem. 82, 109-113[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Webster, C., Silberstein, L., Hays, A. P., and Blau, H. M. (1988) Cell 52, 503-513[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Lee, C. C., Pons, F., Jones, P. G., Bies, R. D., Schlang, A. M., Leger, J. J., and Caskey, C. T. (1993) Hum. Gene Ther. 4, 273-281[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Hoffman, E. P., Brown, R. H., Jr., and Kunkel, L. M. (1987) Cell 51, 919-928[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Crosbie, R. H., Lim, L. E., Moore, S. A., Hirano, M., Hays, A. P., Maybaum, S. W., Collin, H., Dovico, S. A., Stolle, C. A., Fardeau, M., Tome, F. M., and Campbell, K. P. (2000) Hum. Mol. Genet. 9, 2019-2027[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Hack, A. A., Cordier, L., Shoturma, D. I., Lam, M. Y., Sweeney, H. L., and McNally, E. M. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 10723-10728[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Thompson, T. G., Chan, Y. M., Hack, A. A., Brosius, M., Rajala, M., Lidov, H. G., McNally, E. M., Watkins, S., and Kunkel, L. M. (2000) J. Cell Biol. 148, 115-126[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Matsuda, R., Nishikawa, A., and Tanaka, H. (1995) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 118, 959-964[Abstract]
28. Straub, V., Rafael, J. A., Chamberlain, J. S., and Campbell, K. P. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 139, 375-385[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Tinsley, J., Deconinck, N., Fisher, R., Kahn, D., Phelps, S., Gillis, J. M., and Davies, K. (1998) Nat. Med. 4, 1441-1444[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.