Tyrosine Kinase Activation by the Angiotensin II Receptor in the Absence of Calcium Signaling*

T. N. Doan, M. Showkat Ali, and K. E. BernsteinDagger

From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322

Received for publication, April 17, 2001


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor signals via heterotrimeric G-proteins and intracellular tyrosine kinases. Here, we investigate a modified AT1 receptor, termed M5, where the last five tyrosines (residues 292, 302, 312, 319, and 339) within the intracellular carboxyl tail have been mutated to phenylalanine. This receptor did not elevate cytosolic free calcium or inositol phosphate production in response to angiotensin II, suggesting an uncoupling of the receptor from G-protein activation. Despite this, the M5 receptor still activated tyrosine kinases, induced STAT1 tyrosine phosphorylation, and stimulated cell proliferation. We also studied another AT1 mutant receptor, D74E, stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovarian cells and a fibroblast cell line from mice with a genetic inactivation of Galpha q/11. Both cell lines have a deficit in calcium signaling and in G-protein activation, and yet in both cell lines, angiotensin II induced the time-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT1. These studies are the first to show the ability of a seven-transmembrane receptor to activate intracellular tyrosine kinase pathways in the absence of a G-protein-coupled rise in intracellular calcium.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The AT11 receptor is a seven-transmembrane receptor that signals via heterotrimeric G-proteins (1, 2). Ligand binding activates Gq, leading to the generation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) and a rise in cytosolic free calcium. This, in turn, affects cell contractility, secretion, gene transcription, and cell proliferation.

More recently, the AT1 receptor has also been shown to signal by activating nonmembrane tyrosine kinases including Src, Fyn, and Pyk2 (3). In 1995, our group reported that the binding of angiotensin II to the AT1 receptor activated the intracellular tyrosine kinase Jak2 and that this led to the tyrosine phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of the transcription factor STAT1 (4). Although the activation of tyrosine kinases by G-protein-coupled receptor has now been established in several systems including vascular smooth muscle cells (5, 6), mesangial cells (7), zona glomerulosa cells (8), and cardiac cells (9, 10), the interplay between G-protein activation and receptor-mediated kinase activation is less clear. Structure-function studies of the AT1 receptor have defined amino acids critical for coupling the receptor to G-proteins. For example, mutation of either Asp74 or Tyr292 results in the loss of G-protein coupling and blocks the ligand-dependent production of IP3 (11, 12). However, the effect of these mutations on AT1 receptor-dependent tyrosine kinase signaling is not known. In fact, dissecting the importance of angiotensin II-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation signaling from G-protein activation is difficult because of multiple conversion points. For example, both the G-protein and tyrosine kinase pathways activate mitogen-activated protein kinase (9, 10), and both also give rise to an increase in cytosolic free calcium (5, 6, 7).

To separate the effects of AT1 receptor activation of G-proteins from that of tyrosine kinases, we studied a modified AT1 receptor termed M5. The M5 mutant varies from the wild-type AT1 receptor in that the last five tyrosines (positions 292, 302, 312, 319, and 339) within the intracellular carboxyl tail of the AT1 receptor were mutated to phenylalanine. We found that the M5 receptor cannot induce a ligand-mediated calcium signal, suggesting an uncoupling of the mutant receptor from G-protein activation. In contrast, the M5 receptor retained its ability to activate the Jak-STAT pathway. We also studied two other cell lines with defects in calcium signaling. One is a Chinese hamster ovarian cell (CHO) cell line stably transfected with an AT1 receptor containing a D74E mutation. This modified AT1 receptor was previously shown to be uncoupled from G-protein activation (11). In addition, we investigated angiotensin II signaling in fibroblasts derived from mice with a genetic inactivation of Galpha q/11 (13, 14). In both cell lines, angiotensin II stimulated the tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT1. These studies are the first to show the ability of a seven-transmembrane receptor to activate an intracellular tyrosine kinase pathway in the absence of a G-protein-coupled rise in intracellular calcium.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Chinese Hamster Ovarian Cell Clones-- The M5 construct was made using dut- ung- mutagenesis (Bio-Rad) and verified by DNA sequencing. Native CHO were maintained in F-12 media (Life Technologies, Inc.) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Summit Biotechnology), 0.1 units/ml penicillin-streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 1 mM sodium pyruvate. For the generation of AT1 and M5 CHO clones, the cells were stably transfected with either wild-type rat AT1A or M5 plasmid DNA under the control of the SV40 promoter (vector pZeoSV; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) using Lipofectin (Life Technologies, Inc.). The transfected cells were selected with 250 µg/ml of zeocin until individual clones were prevalent. The cells were ring-cloned and screened for binding of 125I-sarcosyl1, Ile8-angiotensin II (125I-Sar-Ile). The cells were maintained in 125 µg/ml of zeocin for all subsequent cultures.

CHO cells stably expressing the AT1 D74E mutant were a kind gift of Dr. Eric Clauser, INSERM, Paris, France (11). Fibroblasts derived from knockout mice with a targeted mutation inactivating Galpha q/11 were a kind gift of Dr. Melvin Simon, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA (13, 14).

125I-Sar-Ile Binding Assay-- Ligand binding was measured as described previously (4). Briefly, cells were seeded onto 24-well plates overnight. The cells were washed twice with physiological saline (in mM): 120 NaCl, 5 KCl, 1.2 MgSO4, 10 NaHCO3, 1.2 KH2PO4, 1 CaCl2, 10 Hepes, and 0.25% bovine serum albumin, pH 7.4. Varying concentrations of 125I-Sar-Ile were then added in the absence or presence of 1 µM angiotensin II for 1 h at room temperature. The plates were placed on ice and washed four times with physiological saline without bovine serum albumin. NaOH (0.5 M) was added to each well, and the lysed cells were counted with a gamma  counter. Protein content was determined for each plate using a Bio-Rad Dc protein assay kit (Bio-Rad).

Calcium Measurements-- Cells were harvested using 0.05% trypsin/EDTA (Life Technologies, Inc.). The cells were washed with Hepes buffer (in mM): 140 NaCl, 5 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 10 glucose, 1 MgCl2, and 10 Hepes, pH 7.4. The cells were loaded with 20 µM fura-2/AM (Molecular Probes) for 30 min at 37 °C and washed for 30 min in the absence of fura-2/AM. Cells were resuspended in 2 ml Hepes buffer, and fluorescence measurements were taken on a time-based scale with an SLM Aminco spectrofluorometer. The fluorophore was excited at 340 and 380 nm. The emission was collected at 510 nm. The ratio (340/380) values were converted to calcium concentrations, where the Kd for fura-2 was 224 nM at 37 °C (15). The relative maximum and relative minimum ratio were acquired in the presence of 0.1% Triton X-100 and 12.5 mM EGTA, respectively.

Inositol-1,4,5 Trisphosphate Production-- IP3 production was measured as described previously (5). Briefly, cells were serum-deprived for 12-16 h and then stimulated with 100 nM angiotensin II for various times in 5 ml F-12 media. Trichloroacetic acid was added to stop the reaction. The cells were scraped and centrifuged at 6000 × g for 10 min. The supernatant was extracted with 1,1,2-trichloro-trifluoroethane and trioctylamine (3:1). The aqueous top layer was saved, and the amount of IP3 was determined by radioreceptor assay according to the manufacturer's guidelines (PerkinElmer Life Sciences).

Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot-- Cells were serum-deprived for 16-20 h and stimulated with 100 nM angiotensin II for various durations. The cells were washed twice with cold phosphate-buffered saline and lysed with 1 ml of RIPA (20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 1% deoxycholic acid, 0.1% SDS, 2.5 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaF, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM Na3VO4, and 10 µg/ml aprotinin). The cells were scraped, sonicated, and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected, and protein concentration was determined using the Bio-Rad Dc protein assay kit. Lysate was incubated with 1-5 µg of antibody and 20 µl of a 50% slurry of protein A/G plus Sepharose beads (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) for 2-24 h at 4 °C. The immunoprecipitant was washed two-four times with wash buffer (25 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Triton X-100) and resuspended in SDS loading buffer. Proteins were separated on 8% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher & Schüll). For Cos-7 cells, the cells were transiently transfected with 0.5 µg of pBOS/Jak2 (gift from Dr. D. M. Wojchowski, Pennsylvania State University) and 10 µg of either pZEO/AT1 or of pZEO/M5 using Lipofectin (Life Technologies, Inc.).

The nitrocellulose membranes were blocked with 5% dry skim milk in TBST (20 mM Tris, pH 7.2, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.05% Tween 20) for 1 h at room temperature. The membrane was incubated with 1 µg/ml of monoclonal anti-phosphotyrosine (PY99; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), 1:1000 polyclonal anti-Jak2 (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.), or 1:1000 monoclonal anti-STAT1 (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY) for 2 h. The membrane was washed three times for 30 min and subsequently incubated with 1:4000 secondary anti-mouse Ig (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for 1 h. The membrane was then washed and exposed for enhanced chemiluminescence (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) on X-Omat Blue film (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY). Unless otherwise stated, all membranes were stripped after blotting with anti-phosphotyrosine and reblotted with anti-Jak2 or anti-STAT1 to ensure equal loading of the immunoprecipitated protein.

Cellular Proliferation Assay-- CHO cells were plated onto 96-well plates at a density of 5 × 103 cells/well with F-12 media containing no serum for 16 h. The cells were then treated with vehicle or angiotensin II for 4 h. MTS tetrazolium (Owen's reagent) (CellTiter 96® Aqueous; Promega, Madison, WI) was added at a ratio of 1:5 relative to the volume of the media. The reaction proceeded for 4 h at 37 °C and was terminated by the addition of 2% SDS. The absorbance was recorded at 490 nm. For each condition, the samples were done in triplicate and averaged for each experiment.

All data were presented as representative trace or mean ± S.E. Statistical significance was determined when p < 0.05 using student's t test.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Using site-directed mutagenesis, the rat AT1A receptor tyrosine residues 292, 302, 312, 319, and 339 were converted to phenylalanine. This mutant AT1 receptor, termed M5, lacks tyrosine residues in the intracellular carboxyl portion of the molecule. The wild-type AT1 and M5 mutant were each transfected into cloned Chinese hamster ovarian cells, which were screened for receptor expression by the binding of the angiotensin II antagonist 125I-Sar-Ile. For further study, we selected clones with similar level of expressed receptor; Scatchard analysis indicated that the Bmax for cells expressing the wild-type AT1 receptor was 0.33 ± 0.07 pmol/µg of protein (clone 1, n = 7) although the Bmax for the clone expressing the M5 receptor was 0.47 ± 0.09 pmol/µg of protein (clone 5, n = 8). Receptor expression in these stable clones was significantly higher than the endogenous angiotensin II receptors in native CHO cells (0.15 ± 0.05 pmol/µg of protein; n = 4). The wild-type AT1 receptor had a Kd of 0.24 ± 0.09 nM (n = 6) whereas the M5 cells had a Kd of 0.18 ± 0.04 nM (n = 7). Thus, the M5 mutant showed an affinity for 125I-Sar-Ile that was equivalent to that of the wild-type receptor.

In CHO cells, the AT1 receptor couples only to Gq and not Gs, Gi, or Go (16). The activation of Gq results in the increase of cytosolic free calcium released from intracellular stores (2). To test whether G-protein coupling occurs with the M5 receptor, we measured angiotensin II-mediated intracellular calcium release (Fig. 1). Nontransfected CHO cells have little to no change in intracellular calcium when treated with 100 nM angiotensin II. In contrast, the addition of 100 µM ATP activated the endogenous purinergic receptors resulting in a brisk transient increase in cytosolic free calcium. An equivalent protocol was performed on cells stably transfected for wild-type AT1 receptor (Fig. 1B). Here, the addition of angiotensin II resulted in a transient rise in cytosolic free calcium, indicating activation of Gq. As expected, the subsequent addition of ATP also induced a transient increase in cytosolic free calcium. We observed that losartan, a selective AT1 receptor antagonist, completely blocked the angiotensin II-mediated calcium response but had no effect on the ATP-evoked calcium response (data not shown). In contrast to the response of the wild-type AT1 receptor, CHO cells expressing the M5 mutant showed no increase in cytosolic free calcium in response to angiotensin II (Fig. 1C). This is not because of an intrinsic defect in calcium signaling per se, because these cells were responsive to ATP. We also evaluated the signaling of a second CHO clone expressing the M5 receptor (clone 8). Despite a nearly 10-fold greater expression of M5 receptor levels than observed with clone 5 cells, clone 8 still showed no rise of intracellular calcium in response to angiotensin II (data not shown). These data suggested that mutation of the carboxyl-terminal five tyrosines of the AT1 receptor disabled receptor activation of Gq.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Calcium signaling. Fura-2/AM-loaded CHO native (A)-, AT1 (B)-, or M5 (C)-expressing cells were stimulated with 100 nM angiotensin II (Ang II) and 100 µM ATP at the time indicated by the arrow. The traces were representative of at least four separate experiments for each cell type.

Angiotensin II-mediated calcium signaling is dependent on IP3 formation. Therefore, we investigated whether the M5 cells were deficient in IP3 production. As shown in Fig. 2A, CHO cells expressing the wild-type AT1 receptor responded to angiotensin II with a rapid increase in IP3 levels within 15 s of stimulation. Quantitation showed a 4.0 ± 1.9-fold increase over basal levels of IP3 after 15 s (Fig. 2B). In contrast, cells expressing the M5 receptor showed no significant change (1.1 ± 0.1-fold) in IP3 production after angiotensin II addition. These data are consistent with the lack of a ligand-mediated calcium response; taken together, they suggest a loss of Gq activation by the M5 receptor.


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   IP3 production. A, CHO AT1 ()- or M5 (black-square)-expressing cells were stimulated with 100 nM angiotensin for 0, 0.25, 0.5, 3, or 5 min. IP3 production was measured by radioreceptor assay. The data are from one experiment that is representative of three independent experiments. B, the average-fold change of IP3 generation in AT1 or M5 cells when stimulated with 100 nM angiotensin II for 15 s (n = 3; * depicts p < 0.05).

In addition to IP3 and calcium signaling, the AT1 receptor also activates nonmembrane tyrosine kinases, such as Jak2. Initially, we chose to investigate M5 activation of the Jak-STAT pathway in transiently transfected Cos-7 cells. When these cells were transiently transfected with constructs encoding both the wild-type AT1 receptor and Jak2, angiotensin II induced a marked increase of Jak2 tyrosine phosphorylation within 3 min of ligand addition (Fig. 3A). Surprisingly, the M5 receptor also responded to angiotensin II with an increase of Jak2 tyrosine phosphorylation. In fact, repetition of this protocol showed that the time course and magnitude of Jak2 activation were similar for both the wild-type AT1 and M5 receptors.


View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Jak2 and STAT1 phosphorylation. Cos-7 cells were co-transfected with 0.5 µg of pBOS/Jak2 and 10 µg of either pZEO/AT1A (left panel) or pZEO/M5 (right panel). The cells were serum-deprived for 16-24 h and were stimulated with angiotensin II (Ang II) for 0, 3, 6, or 10 min. Jak2 (Fig. 3A, n = 8) or STAT1 (Fig. 3B, n = 6) was immunoprecipitated (IP) and immunoblotted (IB) as indicated in the figure. For the STAT1 experiments (Fig. 3B), the cells were treated with or without 10 µM valsartan (Val) for 30-60 min before angiotensin II stimulation.

A consequence of Jak2 activation is the tyrosine phosphorylation of the transcription factor STAT1. When Cos-7 cells were transiently transfected with Jak2 and either the wild-type AT1 receptor or the M5 receptor, STAT1 was phosphorylated in an equivalent time-dependent fashion upon ligand addition. The phosphorylation of STAT1 by angiotensin II was inhibited when cells expressing either receptor type were pretreated with 10 µM valsartan, a specific AT1 receptor antagonist. Thus, the experiments in Fig. 3 show that the M5 receptor, despite its inability to signal via calcium stimulation, remains fully capable of activating the Jak-STAT system in response to angiotensin II.

In addition to Cos-7 cells, angiotensin II also stimulates STAT1 tyrosine phosphorylation in CHO cells stably expressing the AT1 receptor (17). Therefore, we asked whether a CHO clone expressing the M5 receptor would induce STAT1 phosphorylation. Stimulation of native CHO cells with angiotensin II did not show a time-dependent change in STAT1 tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 4A). In contrast, both AT1- and M5-expressing cell clones showed an angiotensin II-mediated increase of STAT1 tyrosine phosphorylation that peaked at about 30 min after ligand addition. The difference in the time course of STAT1 tyrosine phosphorylation in transiently transfected Cos-7 cells (peak phosphorylation at 5-10 min) and stably transfected CHO cells (peak phosphorylation at ~30 min) was equivalent to that found in previously published work (4, 17). In summary, these experiments and those in Fig. 3 show that the M5 receptor remains capable of activating tyrosine kinases despite the absence of calcium signaling.


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT1 in CHO cells stably expressing AT1 and M5 receptors. Native CHO cells (A), AT1 cells (B), or M5 cells (C) were stimulated with 100 nM angiotensin II (Ang II) for 0, 30, 60, and 120 min. Whole-cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with mAb STAT1 and separated on 8% SDS-PAGE. After transferring the proteins onto nitrocellulose membranes, the membranes were blotted for phosphotyrosine using mAb PY99 or mAb STAT1. The blots were representative of at least seven different experiments.

The exact mechanism of angiotensin II-mediated STAT1 phosphorylation in CHO cells appears to be somewhat different from that observed in the transiently transfected Cos-7 cells. In CHO cells stably expressing the wild-type AT1 or the mutant M5 receptors, we were unable to document a ligand-mediated increase of Jak2 tyrosine phosphorylation (data not shown). In addition, the Jak-specific inhibitor AG490 was not effective in inhibiting angiotensin II-mediated STAT1 phosphorylation in CHO cells but did block STAT1 phosphorylation in smooth muscle cells, a system in which angiotensin II-mediated stimulation of Jak2 has been well established (data not shown). In contrast to the negative results with AG490, pretreatment of CHO AT1 or M5 cells with the broad spectrum tyrosine kinase inhibitor genistein did block angiotensin II-mediated STAT1 tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 5). Thus, although the exact mechanism for STAT1 tyrosine phosphorylation in CHO cells is not fully understood, these data establish that, despite an absence of calcium signaling, the M5 receptor can stimulate intracellular tyrosine kinases in response to angiotensin II.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Genistein inhibited the angiotensin II-mediated phosphorylation of STAT1. CHO cells stably expressing AT1 or M5 receptors were stimulated with angiotensin II (Ang II) for 0, 30, 60, and 120 min. As indicated, some cells were pretreated with 100 µM genistein for 1 h. Whole cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) and immunoblotted (IB) as noted in the figure.

To further investigate the relationship between heterotrimeric G-proteins and angiotensin II-dependent activation of tyrosine kinases, we studied two additional lines of cells. Previously, it was reported that a CHO cell line stably transfected with an AT1 receptor bearing a D74E point mutation does not couple to heterotrimeric G-proteins and, as a consequence, does not mobilize intracellular calcium in response to angiotensin II (11). When the CHO D74E cell line was stimulated with angiotensin II and studied for the time-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT1, we found this receptor was similar to the M5 receptor in that tyrosine kinase activity was preserved in the absence of calcium signaling (Fig. 6A).


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   STAT1 tyrosine phosphorylation in CHO cells stably expressing AT1 D74E and in fibroblasts with inactivated Galpha alpha q/11. A, serum-deprived CHO D74E cells were stimulated with 100 nM angiotensin II (Ang II) for 0, 30, 60, and 120 min. Whole-cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-phosphotyrosine mAb PY20 (Transduction Laboratories) and separated on 8% SDS-PAGE. Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes and blotted with mAb STAT1. The data presented are representative of at least three different experiments. B, serum-deprived fibroblasts, isolated from mice expressing inactivated Galpha q/11, were stimulated with 100 nM angiotensin II for 0, 3, 6, and 10 min. Whole-cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with mAb STAT1 and separated on 8% SDS-PAGE. Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes and blotted with mAb PY99 or mAb STAT1. These data are representative of at least five different experiments.

We also investigated angiotensin II-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT1 using fibroblasts isolated from Galpha q/11-deficient mice (13, 14). These mice were prepared using embryonic stem cell targeting and bear a mutation in both Galpha q and Galpha 11 rendering these proteins functionally inactive. Again, angiotensin II resulted in the tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT1 in a time-dependent fashion (Fig. 6B). The time course of STAT1 phosphorylation was more rapid than that observed with CHO cells but was similar to the time course observed in Cos-7 cells (Fig. 3) and in rat aortic smooth muscle cells (4). As anticipated, the effect of angiotensin II on STAT1 phosphorylation in Galpha q/11-deficient fibroblast was markedly blunted by the AT1 receptor inhibitor valsartan (data not shown).

A known effect of angiotensin II is the rapid stimulation of early response genes (19) and the onset of cellular proliferation (2, 16). The onset of cell proliferation was evaluated in CHO cells expressing either the wild-type AT1 or the M5 receptor mutant. These cells were serum-starved and then treated for 4 h in the absence or presence of 100 nM angiotensin II (Fig. 7). The addition of angiotensin II stimulated cellular proliferation in both AT1 and M5 cells as compared with cells not treated with the ligand (Fig. 7, Ang II versus Basal). The mitogenic effect of angiotensin II was ablated when the AT1 or M5 cells were pretreated with genistein or herbimycin, both potent inhibitors of tyrosine kinases. The native CHO cells did not show any significant differences in cell proliferation with or without angiotensin II (data not presented). These data suggest that the activation of tyrosine kinases by angiotensin II appears necessary for the induction of CHO cell proliferation by this ligand. Furthermore, because proliferation is observed with the M5 mutant, G-protein-mediated calcium signaling appears not to be necessary for the proliferation initiated by angiotensin II.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Cell proliferation. CHO cells stably expressing AT1 and M5 receptors were serum-deprived for 12-16 h. Cell proliferation was measured after 4 h in the absence or presence of angiotensin II (Ang II), 100 µM genistein (1 h pre-incubation), or 50 µM herbimycin (1 h pre-incubation). An asterisk denotes p < 0.01 for a comparison of basal versus angiotensin II addition to AT1 and M5 cells. The data were representative of three individual experiments.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The classical signaling pathway for the AT1 receptor is to couple and activate heterotrimeric G-proteins. Recently, experiments established that this receptor can also activate nonmembrane tyrosine kinases including the Jak-STAT pathway (4, 18). A problem in defining the functional role of angiotensin II-mediated tyrosine kinase activation is the difficulty of differentiating the effects mediated by heterotrimeric G-proteins and calcium elevation from the effects predominantly due to the kinase activation. To gain insight into this question, we studied the M5 angiotensin II receptor. This molecule contains five discrete point mutations converting the carboxyl five tyrosine residues to phenylalanine. In response to ligand, the M5 receptor showed no significant elevation of IP3 and cytosolic free calcium. This observation was consistent with the work of Marie et al. (12) who identified a single point mutation of the AT1 receptor, Y292F, that hindered the production of total inositol phosphates. Marie et al. (12) concluded that this mutant receptor was uncoupled from its endogenous G-proteins. In our hands, the M5 mutation is not functionally identical to the Y292F mutation; we find that an AT1 receptor with a single Y292F mutation showed a partial calcium signal in response to angiotensin II (data not shown). Thus, we believe that the four additional Tyr to Phe mutations present in the M5 receptor are necessary for full elimination of G-protein-coupled signaling.

Despite the inability of the M5 receptor to stimulate an increase of intracellular calcium, the receptor is still able to activate tyrosine kinases including Jak2. Previously, our laboratory identified the AT1 motif 319YIPP as critical in angiotensin II-mediated activation of Jak2 (18). This work suggested that it was the proline residues within the YIPP motif that were critical for Jak2 activation. Because the M5 mutant contains a Y319F mutation, the ability of the M5 mutant to stimulate Jak2 reemphasizes that mechanisms apart from AT1 receptor phosphotyrosine residues are critical in the activation process. At present, the exact biochemical pathway by which the AT1 receptor stimulates intracellular tyrosine kinases is unknown.

Other groups have investigated the structural basis for AT1 receptor activation of heterotrimeric proteins. In particular, Bihoreau et al. (11) found that an AT1 receptor with a D74E mutation cannot induce a calcium transient. Using CHO cells stably transfected with the D74E receptor by Bihoreau et al. (11), we independently confirmed that the AT1 D74E receptor does not stimulate calcium but does stimulate STAT1 tyrosine phosphorylation, similar to our experience with M5. Finally, our studies of cells with a genetic inactivation of Galpha q and Galpha 11 showed that the AT1 receptor can activate tyrosine phosphorylation in the absence of these G-proteins. Signaling by the AT1 receptor in the absence of Galpha q/11 is similar to M5 receptor signaling in that both appear to represent examples of tyrosine kinase activation in the absence of G-protein coupling.

Normally, angiotensin II-mediated signaling is complex with many conversion points between signaling pathways stimulated by elevated intracellular calcium and pathways downstream of kinase activation. Our work now establishes that in CHO cells, the onset of cell proliferation observed with angiotensin II can be attributed in large measure to an activation of tyrosine kinase pathways. The creation of mutant receptors lacking the ability to stimulate specific intracellular pathways is a powerful approach toward establishing the functional cause and effects of individual signaling pathways.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Laurie Dirksen for help in constructing the M5 receptor. Dr. Eric Clauser provided the CHO-AT1 D74E clone. Dr. Melvin Simon provided the fibroblasts isolated from mice expressing the inactivated Galpha q/11 mutation. Dr. D. M. Wojchowski provided the pBOS/Jak2 construct.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants DK39777, DK44280, DK51445, and HL61710. Dr. Doan is supported by National Institutes of Health Grant F32 HL10269.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Woodruff Memorial Bldg., Rm. 7107A, 1639 Pierce Dr., Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322. Tel.: 404-727-3134; Fax: 404-727-8540; E-mail: kbernst@emory.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 23, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.C100199200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: AT1, angiotensin II type 1; IP3, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate; STAT, signal transducers and activators of transcription; CHO, Chinese hamster ovarian cell(s); PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; mAb, monoclonal antibody; 125I-Sar-Ile, 125I-sarcosyl1, Ile8-angiotensin II.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Murphy, T. J., Alexander, R. W., Griendling, K. K., Runge, M. S., and Bernstein, K. E. (1991) Nature 351, 233-236[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Teutsch, B., Bihoreau, C., Monnot, C., Bernstein, K. E., Murphy, T. J., Alexander, R. W., Corvol, P., and Clauser, E. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 187, 1381-1388[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Sayeski, P. P., Ali, M. S., Semeniuk, D. J., Doan, T. N., and Bernstein, K. E. (1998) Regul. Pept. 78, 19-29[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Marrero, M. B., Schieffer, B., Paxton, W. G., Heerdt, L., Berk, B. C., Delafontaine, P., and Bernstein, K. E. (1995) Nature 375, 247-250[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Harp, J. B., Sayeski, P. P., Scanlon, M., Bernstein, K. E., and Marrero, M. B. (1997) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 232, 540-544[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Ushio-Fukai, M., Griendling, K. K., Akers, M., Lyons, P. R., and Alexander, R. W. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 19772-19777[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Marrero, M. B., Schieffer, B., Ma, H., Bernstein, K. E., and Ling, B. N. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 270, C1834-C1842[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Bodart, V., Ong, H., and Lean, A. D. (1995) J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 54, 55-62[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Schorb, W., Peeler, T. C., Madigan, N. N., Conrad, K. M., and Baker, K. M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 19626-19632[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Sadoshima, J., Qiu, Z., Morgan, J. P., and Izumo, S. (1995) Circ. Res. 76, 1-15[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Bihoreau, C., Monnot, C., Davies, E., Teutsch, B., Bernstein, K. E., Corvol, P., and Clauser, E. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 5133-5137[Abstract]
12. Marie, J., Maigret, B., Joseph, M. P., Larguier, R., Nouet, S., Lombardi, C., and Bonnafous, J. C. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 20815-20818[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Offermanns, S., Zhao, L. P., Gohla, A., Sarosi, I., Simon, M. I., and Wilkie, T. M. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 4304-4312[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Offermanns, S., and Simon, M. I. (1998) Oncogene 17, 1375-1381[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Grynkiewicz, G., Poenie, M., and Tsien, R. Y. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 3440-3450[Abstract]
16. Conchon, S., Barrault, M. B., Miserey, S., Corvol, P., and Clauser, E. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 25566-25572[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Bhat, G. J., Thekkumkara, T. J., Thomas, W. G., Conrad, K. M., and Baker, K. M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 31443-31449[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Ali, M. S., Sayeski, P. P., Dirksen, L. B., Hayzer, D. J., Marrero, M. B., and Bernstein, K. E. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 5592-5595 [the correct citation is (1997) J Biol Chem, 272: 22382] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Wang, C., Jayadev, S., and Escobedo, J. A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 16677-16682[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.