Interaction of the Hepatitis B Virus X Protein with the Crm1-dependent Nuclear Export Pathway*

Marshonna ForguesDagger , Aizen J. MarrogiDagger , Elisa A. SpillareDagger , Chuan-Ging WuDagger , Qin YangDagger , Minoru Yoshida§, and Xin Wei WangDagger

From the Dagger  Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 and the § Department of Biotechnology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Received for publication, February 8, 2001, and in revised form, March 29, 2001

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The leucine-rich nuclear export signal (NES) is used to shuttle large cellular proteins from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. The nuclear export receptor Crm1 is essential in this process by recognizing the NES motif. Here, we show that the oncogenic hepatitis B virus (HBV) X protein (HBx) contains a functional NES motif. We found that the predominant cytoplasmic localization of HBx is sensitive to the drug leptomycin B (LMB), which specifically inactivates Crm1. Mutations at the two conserved leucine residues to alanine at the NES motif (L98A,L100A) resulted in a nuclear redistribution of HBx. A recombinant HBx protein binds to Crm1 in vitro. In addition, ectopic expression of HBx sequesters Crm1 in the cytoplasm. Furthermore, HBx activates NFkappa B by inducing its nuclear translocation in a NES-dependent manner. Abnormal cytoplasmic sequestration of Crm1, accompanied by a nuclear localization of NFkappa B, was also observed in hepatocytes from HBV-positive liver samples with chronic active hepatitis. We suggest that Crm1 may play a role in HBx-mediated liver carcinogenesis.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)1 is one of the most prevalent malignant diseases worldwide and hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the major etiologic factor for HCC (1-3). HBV is a DNA tumor virus, which encodes four open reading frames, S/preS, C/preC, P, and HBx (4). The oncogenicity of HBV is largely the result of HBx, the smallest gene encoding a 17-kDa protein (3, 5-8). One major cellular function of HBx is its promiscuous transcriptional activation activity, a property that is believed to contribute to its oncogenicity (9). A wide range of cellular genes can be up-regulated or down-regulated by HBx (9). However, HBx is localized in the cytoplasm mostly and does not bind to double-stranded DNA. A "universal" effect of HBx, on otherwise totally different types of promoters with no obvious consensus sequence, has led to the hypothesis that HBx may regulate gene expression by interacting directly with host general transcription factors (10-12), or indirectly via the activation of protein kinase C and RAS-RAF mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways (13-15). Although HBx can induce neoplastic transformation, presumably by preventing p53-mediated apoptosis (16-18), it also can induce apoptosis in a p53-dependent or -independent manner (19, 20),2 or sensitize cells to tumor necrosis factor alpha  (TNFalpha )-induced apoptosis (21). Therefore, the precise mechanism related to its effector remains unknown and none of these studies satisfactorily explain the pleiotropic effects associated with HBx.

Close inspection of the HBx sequence revealed a short, hydrophobic, leucine-rich nuclear export signal motif (NES) (Fig. 1A). An NES is located in the center region of HBx (residues 89-100). The center region of HBx is retained in HCC frequently and is essential for its transactivation (22-24). This region also is conserved among HBx from different subtypes (Fig. 1A). Several viral proteins including HIV-1 Rev, HTLV-1 Rex, and adenovirus E4 34-kDa proteins contain functional NESs (Fig. 1A). Similar to HBx, Rev and Rex also are potent viral and cellular transactivators with no apparent DNA binding property (25, 26). In addition, NESs also have been identified in cellular proteins, many of which are involved in transcription, cell signaling cascade, oncogenic transformation, and cell cycle regulators. Examples include protein kinase inhibitor, MAP kinase kinase (MAPKK), TFIIIA, Mdm2, p53, Ikappa Balpha , NF-AT, cyclin B1, c-Abl, and 14-3-3 (reviewed in Ref. 27). The activities of these proteins are tightly regulated by their NESs. The nuclear export receptor Crm1 and its cofactor Ran GTPase are essential in this process by recognizing NESs and mediating nuclear protein export (27, 28). In addition, previous results indicate that Crm1 may be involved in maintaining chromosomal integrity (29) and Ran may play a key role in regulating mitosis initiation by stimulating spindle formation (30, 31). Mutation of the hydrophobic leucine residues to alanines have been shown to disrupt NES function in a number of proteins, including HIV-rev, E4 34-kDa, p53, Mdm2, and cyclin B1 (25, 26, 32, 33).

In this study, we have investigated the hypothesis that the pleiotropic effects associated with HBx may be contributed by the presence of a NES motif, and HBx may activate cellular gene expression and induce oncogenicity through the modulation of Crm1-mediated functions. We have identified a functional NES motif in HBx. This motif is necessary for HBx-induced cytoplasmic sequestration of Crm1, and subsequently, the nuclear translocation and activation of NFkappa B. Cytoplasmic retention of Crm1 also is found in liver samples with chronic active hepatitis infected with HBV, a condition that is predisposing individuals to the development of HCC. We suggest that the inactivation of the Crm1-mediated pathway may be an early step during viral hepatitis-mediated liver carcinogenesis.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Plasmid Construction-- The plasmid pcDNA3-HBxadr-Hatag was constructed by the insertion of a C-terminal hemagglutinin (HA) epitope-tagged full-length HBx into the BamHI and HindIII sites of a pcDNA3 vector (Invitrogen). GFP-HBx and GFP-HBx-NESM were constructed as follows: a 529-base pair fragment released from the digestion of pcDNA3-HBxadr-Hatag with HindIII/ApaI and inserted into pEGFP-C2 (CLONTECH) at the HindIII/ApaI sites. The resulting GFP-HBx is an N-terminal fusion of HBx with GFP and a C-terminal fusion with HA tag. GFP-HBx-NESM was made by a PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis protocol using GFP-HBx as a template. To generate the HBx-NES mutant (L98A,G99A,L100A), 2 HBx fragments were amplified by PCR using primer pairs (5'-GCTGCTGCATCAGCAATGTCAACAACCGAC-3'/5'-ATGCTCTAGAGGCAGAGGTGAAAAAGTTGCATGG-3' and 5'-TGCAGCAGCAGTCCTCTTATGTAAGAGCTT-3'/5'-TATAAAGCTTGGTACCGAGCTCGGATCTGATGGC-3'). The 2 PCR DNA fragments were denatured and reannealed. Then the HBx-NES mutant was generated by PCR with primers (5'-TATAAAGCTTGGTACCGAGCTCGGATCTGATGGC-3' and 5'-ATGCTCTAGAGGCAGAGGTGAAAAAGTTGCATGG-3') and was subcloned into the pEGFP-C2 vector. Mutations were verified by DNA sequencing. The GFP-NLS-NES and GFP-NLS-NESM constructs were made by the strategy described previously (34). Briefly, the SV40 NLS motif (residues 125-133) was fused to GFP by the cloning of oligos TNLS1 (5'-TCGAGATCCCCCCAAGAAGAAGCGCAAGGTGGAGCA-3'/TNLS2 5'-AGCTTGCTCCACCTTGCGCTTCTTCTTGGGGGGATC-3') into plasmid pGFPF-C1 (CLONTECH) to generate GFP-NLS. GFP-NES and GFP-NESM were constructed by cloning oligos XNESW1 (5'-AATTCTCAGGTCTTGCCCAAGCTCTTACATAAGAGGACTCTTGGACTCTCAGCAATG-3')/XNESW2 (5'-GATCCATTGCTGAGAGTCCAAGAGTCCTCTTATGTAAGAGCTTGGGCAAGACCTGAG-3') or XNESM3 (5'-AATTCTCAGGTCTTGCCCAAGCTCTTACATAAGAGGACTGCTGGAGCCTCAGCAATG-3')- /XNESM4 (5'-GATCCATTGCTGAGGCTCCAGCAGTCCTCTTATGTAAGAGCTTGGGCAAGACCTGAG-3'), respectively, into GFP-NLS, resulting in a GFP-NLS-NES or GFP-NLS-NESM fusion protein. The NES motif corresponds to the HBx residues 87-103, while NESM is the HBx-NES motif with mutations at the conserved leucine residues (L98A and L100A). pSVCM contains a GFP-CRM1 fusion gene under the control of a CMV promoter (28). pNFkappa B-Luc, provided by John Brady (NCI), contains a luciferase gene under the promoter containing 4 NFkappa B responsive elements.

Cell Culture and Media-- Normal primary human fibroblasts were obtained from Coriell Institute for Medical Research (Camden, NJ). These cells were grown in Ham's F-10 medium supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum and were used before passage 12. A telomerase-immortalized human fibroblast line (NHF-hTERT), a gift of Dr. Judy Campisi, was grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. Normal primary human hepatocytes were purchased from Clonetics (BioWittaker), grown in LCM (BioWittaker), and used only at passage 1. Hep3B cells were grown in Eagle's minimum essential medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum.

Microinjection, Transfection, Luciferase, and Indirect Immunofluorescence Assays-- Microinjection of NHF cells was done essentially as described previously (35). Transfection of NHF-hTERT and Hep3B cells was carried out by the LipofectAMINE Plus reagent based on the recommended protocol described by the manufacturer (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD). For the luciferase reporter assay, cells were seeded into 6-well dishes (Costar) at 50% confluence, co-transfected with 0.2 µg of pNFkB-Luc or pNFAT-Luc, along with 2 µg of each of various HBx constructs, in the presence or absence of TNFalpha (10 ng/ml). A total of 0.5 µg of pRL-null or 0.003 µg of pRL-CMV was added into each transfection as an internal control. pEGFPC1 was used to keep the total amount of plasmid DNA constant. Cells were then incubated for 24 h prior to harvesting. The luciferase activity was carried out by the Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions and were measured in a Monolight 2010 luminometer (Analytical Luminescence Laboratory). The luciferase activity was expressed as fold activation against the untreated reporter by itself, which was normalized by Renilla luciferase activity for the transfection efficiency. The reported results represent at least three independent transfections. For immunocytochemistry analysis, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline for 10 min, followed by methanol for 20 min at 24 h postmicroinjection, and washed in phosphate-buffered saline-plus (0.15% glycine, 0.5% bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline). The GFP fusion proteins can be visualized directly in a fluorescence microscope equipped with an fluorescein isothiocyanate filter with or without fixation. The HBx expression also was verified by an anti-HBx monoclonal antibody (data not shown). NFkappa B was detected using an anti-NFkappa B polyclonal antibody (1:100) (Santa Cruz) and Crm1 was detected using an anti-Crm1 polyclonal antibody (1:100). Both antibodies were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. Anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to fluorescein or Texas Red (Vector Laboratories) was used (1:300) for 1 h at room temperature. Nuclei were stained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. The following criteria were used to define the subcellular localization, preferentially cytoplasmic localization: protein signals mostly intense in the cytoplasm; preferentially nuclear localization: protein signals mostly intense in the nucleus. Some of the slides were analyzed with a blind fashion to avoid any bias. For GFP-NLS reporter expression, cells on the same coverslip were microinjected with GFP-NLS, GFP-NLS-XNES, or GFP-NLS-XNESM construct and incubated for 6 h. Cells were monitored under a Zeiss Axioskop fluorescence microscope and representative images were taken using a high-performance CCD imaging system (IP Lab Spectrum) with the same exposure time. For co-localization of Crm1 and HBx analysis, cells were co-stained with anti-HBx and anti-Crm1 antibodies with the corresponding secondary antibodies conjugated with Texas Red or fluorescein, and analyzed by a Bio-Rad MRC 1024 confocal system. Sequential excitation at 488 and 568 nm was provided by a krypton-argon gas laser. Emission filters of 598/40 and 522/32 were used for sequentially collecting red and green fluorescence in channels 1 and 2, respectively. Z-sections were collected at 0.5-µm intervals for each cell using LaserSharp software. Images were analyzed by Confocal Assistant software.

In Vitro Protein-binding Assay-- In vitro binding between HBx and hCrm1 was determined with the in vitro translated HBx and hCrm1 (16). The HA-tagged HBx and the hCrm1 proteins were made by the one-step TnT in vitro transcription and translation system (Promega), as described previously (16), from pcDNA-HA-HBx and hCrm1Blue744 vectors (gift of Dr. Gerard Grosveld), respectively. Aliquots of HBx (25 µl) and hCrm1 (45 µl) were mixed together in CBBL buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.1% Nonidet P-40) in the presence of 0.2 mM GTPgamma S and 80 µl of anti-HA affinity matrix (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN). The mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 60 min. After centrifugation, beads were washed four times with CBBL buffer. The bound proteins were separated on SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Crm1 was detected by Western blotting using anti-Crm1 antibody and followed by the Amersham ECL system. A 10% of in vitro translated hCrm1 was loaded in parallel as the input.

Immunohistochemistry Analysis-- A total of 12 samples were included in this part of the study. Histopathologically, they included 5 normal liver samples, 7 viral hepatitis cases showing grades 1 to 2 activity according to the criteria of Scheuer (36). In addition to H & E light microscopy, tissue sections were cut from frozen samples with a thickness of 4 µm and mounted on electrically charged glass slides. The sections were fixed in absolute alcohol and then washed with 2 changes of phosphate-buffered saline for 5 min each. They were then quenched with 3% hydrogen peroxide to block the endogenous peroxidase activity for 30 min. Following incubation with 10% horse serum to block the nonspecific binding, the sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C with anti-CRM1 antibodies. The sections were prepared in duplicate and two anti-CRM1 antibodies were used, including a goat anti-Crm1 antibody from Santa Cruz at a 1:10 dilution (Santa Cruz) and a rabbit anti-Crm1 polyclonal antibody (Gift from Gerard Grosveld) at a 1:100 dilution. A rabbit anti-NFkappa B antibody (anti-p65) (Santa Cruz) was used at a 1:100 dilution for staining NFkappa B. Biotinylated secondary antibodies and streptavidin peroxidase complex (LSAB) were used. Chromogenic development was obtained by the immersion of sections in 3,3'-diaminobenzidine solution (0.25 mg/ml with 3% hydrogen peroxide). The slides were counterstained with Harris' hematoxylin and re-hydrated with alcohol and xylene. Slides were evaluated in a blind fashion.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

HBx Has a Functional Leucine-rich Nuclear Export Signal-- To test if HBx-NES functions in nuclear protein export, we first investigated whether the subcellular localization of HBx is sensitive to LMB, an antitumor agent that selectively binds to and blocks Crm1-mediated nuclear export (37, 38). Consistent with previous findings (18), HBx was localized in the cytoplasm predominately with a punctate staining pattern in appearance when expressed transiently in normal human fibroblasts (NHF) (Fig. 1) and in a HCC-derived cell line (Hep3B) (data not shown). However, LMB treatment causes an increase in nuclear accumulation of HBx (Fig. 1, B and C). Next, we used a GFP protein export reporter assay described previously (34) to further test if the HBx-NES oligopeptide functions in nuclear protein export (34). This reporter uses a nuclear localization signal (NLS) fused to a GFP, thereby inducing nuclear localization of the fusion protein. Consistently, the GFP-NLS reporter was localized in the nucleus of NHF exclusively. However, when an HBx-NES was fused to this reporter, the resulting GFP-NLS-XNES fusion protein can be found in the cytoplasm with a diffused staining pattern in appearance, although no nuclear exclusion of this reporter protein could be observed (Fig. 1D). In contrast, GFP-NLS-XNESM that contains a mutated HBx-NES oligopeptide (L98A,L100A) does not localize in the cytoplasm (Fig. 1D). To further examine if cytoplasmic localization of a full-length HBx is dependent on the presence of an NES, a GFP-HBx fusion gene (HBx) or an NES-mutated GFP-HBx fusion gene (HBxNESM) was constructed. Again, GFP-HBx was localized in the cytoplasm predominantly with a punctate pattern in appearance, while HBxNESM was found mainly in the nucleus with a diffused pattern (Fig. 1E). Taken together, these data demonstrate that HBx-NES is functional in Crm1-mediated nuclear protein export.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   The hepatitis B virus HBx protein contains a functional NES. A, sequence comparison of the leucine-rich NESs between 3 subtypes of HBx and other proteins with known NES function. Dots indicate the critical residues, in which mutations are known to inactivate the activity of the NESs. B, effect of LMB on subcellular localization of HBx in primary human fibroblasts. HBx was expressed transiently in normal human fibroblasts via microinjection. Following 24 h incubation, cells were treated with (right panels) or without (left panels) 4 nM LMB for 2 h. HBx protein was detected by indirect immunofluorescence staining with monoclonal anti-HBx antibody and followed by fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody (top panels). Nuclei of the same cells were stained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (bottom panels). Representative images are shown (magnification is × 600). C, percent of cells with cytoplasmic localization of HBx from B. D, HBx-NES is functional in nuclear export. Several GFP fusion constructs were expressed transiently in normal primary human fibroblasts. Living cells were monitored under a fluorescence microscope. A nuclear localization signal from SV40 T antigen directs GFP to the nucleus (left panel) while the HBx-NES redistributes it to the cytoplasm (middle panel). Mutations of leucine to alanine in NES abolish this activity (right panel). E, the HBx-NES mutant is localized preferentially in the nucleus. Normal human fibroblasts were microinjected with the GFP-HBx or GFP-HBx-NESM expression vector. Following a 24-h incubation, cells were fixed and stained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. The percent of cells in which the GFP signal was found preferentially in the cytoplasm (left panel), in the nucleus (middle panel), or both (evenly distributed; right panel) was determined. Examples of these images are shown. Data are an average of three independent experiments.

Interaction between Crm1 and HBx-- Nuclear export receptor Crm1 is known to interact with proteins containing NESs and to mediate nuclear protein export. The majority of Crm1 protein is found in the nucleus of normal cells (39). Consistently, every NHF cell displays an endogenous nuclear-diffused Crm1 distribution (Fig. 2). When HBx was expressed transiently in NHF, Crm1 was often found in the cytoplasm with a punctate staining pattern. Approximately 39% ± 2 of the HBx-expressing NHF cells displayed co-localization of Crm1, and over 99% of cytoplasmic punctate Crm1 signals were co-localized with HBx (Fig. 2A). The punctate staining patterns containing both Crm1 and HBx signals were not always the same in appearance (Fig. 2A, panels c-l). These results suggest that the cytoplasmic HBx and Crm1 are not necessarily associated with a single subcellular component. In contrast, no cytoplasmic co-localization was found in NHF cells expressing HBxNESM. These data indicate that HBx was able to partially retain Crm1 in the cytoplasm and suggest that HBx binds to Crm1 in vivo. Consistently, in vitro translated HBx can physically interact with in vitro translated Crm1 (Fig. 2B).


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Interaction between the nuclear export receptor Crm1 and HBx. A, co-localization of HBx and Crm1 in the cytoplasm. Normal human primary fibroblasts were immunostained with anti-Crm1 and detected by an fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibody (a, c, g, i, and k). Cells without (a and b) and with transient expression of HBx (c-l) were immunostained with anti-HBx and detected by a Texas Red-conjugated secondary antibody (d, h, j, and l). The following images are from the same filed to visualize the co-localization of HBx and Crm1: panels c-f; panels e and f; panels g and h; panels i and j; panels k and l. B, HBx is able to bind to Crm1 in vitro. In vitro translated hCrm1 was incubated without (lane 2) or with in vitro translated HA-tagged HBx (lane 3). Following immunoprecipitation with anti-HA antibody, Crm1 was detected by Western blot analysis with anti-Crm1 polyclonal antibody. One-tenth of the in vitro translated hCrm1 protein was loaded in parallel as input (lane 1).

HBx-mediated Activation of NFkappa B Is Dependent on the Presence of NES-- HBx can activate NFkappa B and other cellular transcription factors including NF-AT and MAP kinase cascade, although the mechanism of activation is unknown (14, 40, 41). Because NFkappa B is inactivated normally through its binding to Ikappa Balpha which is sequestrated in the cytoplasm by Crm1-mediated nuclear export (42), we examined whether HBx-NES is responsible for the activation of NFkappa B. Over 97% of normal dividing NHF cells display a predominant localization of NFkappa B in the cytoplasm (Fig. 3A). In contrast, ~55 ± 7% of HBx-expressing NHF cells show a preferentially nuclear distribution of NFkappa B, while an NES mutated HBx (HBxNESM) has lost this activity (Fig. 3, A and B). Next, we used a luciferase reporter that contains NFkappa B responsive elements (pNFkB-Luc) to investigate if the HBx-induced nuclear localization of NFkappa B correlates with its activity. pNFkappa B-Luc was co-transfected with HBx or HBxNESM into an hTERT-immortalized NHF (NHF-hTERT) or a hepatocellular carcinoma cell line (Hep3B) in the absence or presence of TNFalpha , an agent known to sensitize HBx-mediated transactivation (9). Consistently, HBx alone induced the luciferase activity weakly which could be further enhanced by the treatment of TNFalpha in both NHF-hTERT and Hep3B cells. In contrast, HBxNESM is devoid of its ability to increase luciferase activity even in the presence of TNFalpha (Fig. 3C).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   HBx-mediated activation of NFkappa B is dependent on a functional nuclear export motif. A, normal primary human fibroblasts were expressed transiently without (a-c), or with HBx (d-f) or HBxNESM (g-i) for 24 h. Cells were fixed and stained with anti-NFkappa B. Texas Red-conjugated secondary antibody was used to visualize NFkappa B (a, d, and g). The HBx signal was detected directly with an fluorescein isothiocyanate filter (e and h). Percentages of cells with nuclear staining of NFkappa B that are positive for HBx are shown B. C, a luciferase reporter containing 4 NFkappa B responsive elements was transfected with HBx or an HBx mutant (HBxNESM, L98A, G99A, L100A) into a telomerase-immortalized human fibroblast line (NHF-hTERT) or a hepatocellular carcinoma cell line (Hep3B). Cells were then treated with or without 3 ng/ml TNFalpha for 24 h. The luciferase activity was measured and data were normalized by an internal Renilla luciferase vector.

Cytoplasmic Localization of Crm1 Associated with HBV-infected Liver Samples-- To investigate if Crm1 is sequestrated cytoplasmically in liver samples from chronic active hepatitis patients with HBV infection, we performed immunohistochemistry analysis of Crm1 in frozen tissue sections or in paraffin-embedded sections by anti-Crm1 polyclonal antibody. A total of 12 liver samples with samples from 5 normal individuals were included in this study. The presence of HBV DNA including Core, preS, and HBx genes in these samples was verified by PCR (data not shown). Among 7 HBV positive cases, liver samples show chronic active hepatitis with grades 1 to 2 activity (Table I). While 5/5 normal samples revealed nuclear Crm1 staining exclusively, 6/7 HBV samples showed cytoplasmic Crm1 staining (Fig. 4 and Table I) in hepatocytes. An anti-NFkappa B antibody was also used to determine the status of NFkappa B in these liver samples. Again, normal liver samples revealed mainly a cytoplasmic localization of NFkappa B while HBV positive liver samples showed a nuclear distribution of NFkappa B. The above findings provide an in vivo physiological significance for the presence of a cytoplasmic sequestration of Crm1 accompanied by an activation of NFkappa B associated with HBV infection.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Cytoplasmic sequestration of Crm1 and nuclear localization of NFkappa B associated with HBV-infected liver samples


View larger version (159K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Cytoplasmic sequestration of Crm1 and nuclear localization of NFkappa B associated with HBV-infected liver samples. Frozen sections of a normal (A, C, and E) and an HBV positive (B, D, and F) liver samples were analyzed by H & E staining (A and B), anti-Crm1 antibody staining (C and D), or anti-NFkappa B antibody staining (E and F). Representative images are shown. Arrows indicate representative cells that are positively stained by anti-Crm1 or anti-NFkappa B antibodies. Primary magnifications: H & E images, ×200; IHC images, ×400.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We have demonstrated that the oncogenic HBx contains a functional NES, and that this NES is required for the HBx-mediated activation of the NFkappa B signaling cascade. We also have shown that HBx is able to bind to and sequester Crm1 in the cytoplasm, which correlates with the nuclear localization and activation of NFkappa B. Furthermore, liver samples from HBV-infected patients with chronic active hepatitis, a condition predisposing individuals for the development of liver cancer, also display cytoplasmic sequestration of Crm1 and nuclear localization of NFkappa B. It is possible that HBx may use a Crm1-dependent mechanism to modulate cellular gene transcription. Our data provide a plausible model whereby HBx may induce oncogenicity through the modulation of the Crm1-mediated pathway.

The studies described in this report may offer a common mechanism to explain the pleiotropic effects of HBx. First, Crm1 transports and controls many cellular proteins including NFkappa B, NF-AT, MAPKK, and p53, whose activities are known to be regulated by HBx (14, 17, 40, 41, 43). Second, Crm1 also regulates cytoplasmic mRNA transport. Inactivation of Crm1 by HBx, in principle, would alter the stability of mRNA thereby influencing gene expression. Consistent with this hypothesis is our findings that HBx is able to sequester Crm1 in the cytoplasm. The HBx-NES is essential for sequestering Crm1 in the cytoplasm and for the activation of NFkappa B. Inactivation of Crm1-mediated nuclear protein export is known to activate this target (44). Therefore, the promiscuous transactivation-mediated by HBx may be a secondary effect resulting from alteration of Crm1 function.

An alternative mechanism for HBx to activate NFkappa B is through the degradation of Ikappa Balpha in the cytoplasm by inducing its phosphorylation and ubiquitination. However, we did not observe any detectable degradation of Ikappa Balpha in cells expressing HBx by Western blot analysis with anti-Ikappa Balpha antibody (data not shown). This also correlates with our results that HBx alone only displays a weak activation of NFkappa B that can be enhanced significantly by TNFalpha (Fig. 3C). It is possible that a small degree of dissociation of the NFkappa B-Ikappa Balpha complex, followed by the degradation of Ikappa Balpha induced by HBx in the cytoplasm, may contribute to the nuclear localization of NFkappa B. A recent study by Weil and colleagues (45) indicate that HBx may induce the nuclear import of NFkappa B/Ikappa Balpha by binding to Ikappa Balpha . Interestingly, the region of Ikappa Balpha that is critical for HBx-induced nuclear import of Ikappa Balpha contains a functional NES (45). These findings are consistent with our data that HBx-induced nuclear localization of NFkappa B/Ikappa Balpha is dependent on the Ikappa Balpha -NES.

HBx is thought to be small enough to diffuse passively through the nuclear pore complex. The fact that this oncogenic viral protein has acquired NES activity, is preferentially localized in the cytoplasm, and modified nuclear export implies that nuclear export may be an important target for viral-mediated oncogenesis. Interestingly, cellular oncoproteins such as c-Abl and Mdm2 are known to be involved in a Crm1-dependent nuclear export. Analogous to viral hepatitis oncoprotein, the cellular oncoproteins, in principle, may induce neoplastic transformation also through the disruption of the Crm1-mediated mechanism. It is known that TPR and CAN are nuclear pore complex-associated proteins that act as the docking sites and are essential for Crm1-mediated nuclear export (27). Earlier findings demonstrated that the TPR and CAN genes are mutated through translocation in thyroid carcinoma, gastric carcinoma, and acute myeloid leukemia (46-52). We also found that cytoplasmic sequestration of Crm1 is associated frequently with HCC (data not shown). In addition, Crm1 and Ran may play a role in mitosis initiation (29-31). It is possible that the inactivation of Crm1 and Ran may induce genomic instability, a predisposing factor for cancer development. Thus, we postulate that the inactivation of the Crm1-mediated nuclear export is a common event during viral and cellular oncogenesis.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Gerard Grosveld for generous gifts of anti-Crm1 antibody and the Crm1 cDNA, Dr. Barbara Wolff for the leptomycin B, Dr. John Brady for the pNFkappa B-Luc plasmid, Dr. Judy Campisi for the NHF-hTERT cell line, and Dr. Rodney Markin for the human liver samples. We are grateful to Dr. Curtis Harris and members of his group for scientific support, Susan Garfield for assistance on the confocal imaging analysis, and Dorothea Dudek for excellent editorial assistance.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom reprint requests should be addressed: LHC, NCI, National Institutes of Health, 37 Convent Dr., MSC 4255, Bldg. 37, Rm. 2C07, Bethesda, MD 20892-4255. E-mail: xin_wei_wang@nih.gov.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 3, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M101259200

2 M. Forgues, A. J. Marrogi, E. A. Spillare, C-G. Wu, Q. Yang, M. Yoshida, and X. W. Wang, unpublished data.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; NES, nuclear export signal; NLS, nuclear localization signal; HBx, hepatitis B viral X protein; HBV, hepatitis B virus; NHF, normal human fibroblasts; LMB, leptomycin B; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; TNFalpha , tumor necrosis factor-alpha ; HA, hemagglutinin; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; GFP, green fluorescent protein; GTPgamma S, guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Di Bisceglie, A. M., Rustgi, V. K., Hoofnagle, J. H., Dusheiko, G. M., and Lotze, M. T. (1988) Ann. Intern. Med. 108, 390-401[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Montesano, R., Hainaut, P., and Wild, C. P. (1997) J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 89, 1844-1851[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Brechot, C., Gozuacik, D., Murakami, Y., and Paterlini-Brechot, P. (2000) Semin. Cancer Biol. 10, 211-231[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Ganem, D., and Varmus, H. E. (1987) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 56, 651-693[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Unsal, H., Yakicier, C., Marcais, C., Kew, M., Volkmann, M., Zentgraf, H., Isselbacher, K. J., and Ozturk, M. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 822-826[Abstract]
6. Paterlini, P., Poussin, K., Kew, M., Franco, D., and Brechot, C. (1995) Hepatology 21, 313-321[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Robinson, W. S. (1999) in Microbes and Malignancy: Infection as a Cause of Human Cancers (Parsonnet, J., ed) , pp. 232-266, Oxford University Press, New York
8. Kim, Y. C., Song, K. S., Yoon, G., Nam, M. J., and Ryu, W. S. (2001) Oncogene 20, 16-23[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Andrisani, O. M., and Barnabas, S. (1999) Int. J. Oncol. 15, 373-379[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Cheong, J. H., Yi, M., Lin, Y., and Murakami, S. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 143-150[Abstract]
11. Qadri, I., Maguire, H. F., and Siddiqui, A. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 1003-1007[Abstract]
12. Qadri, I., Conaway, J. W., Conaway, R. C., Schaack, J., and Siddiqui, A. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 10578-10583[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Kekulë, A. S., Lauer, U., Weiss, L., Luber, B., and Hofschneider, P. H. (1993) Nature 361, 742-745[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Benn, J., and Schneider, R. J. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 10350-10354[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Wang, H. D., Trivedi, A., and Johnson, D. L. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 6838-6846[Abstract]
16. Wang, X. W., Forrester, K., Yeh, H., Feitelson, M. A., Gu, J. R., and Harris, C. C. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 2230-2234[Abstract]
17. Wang, X. W., Gibson, M. K., Vermeulen, W., Yeh, H., Forrester, K., Sturzbecher, H. W., Hoeijmakers, J. H. J., and Harris, C. C. (1995) Cancer Res. 55, 6012-6016[Abstract]
18. Elmore, L. W., Hancock, A. R., Chang, S. F., Wang, X. W., Chang, S., Callahan, C. P., Geller, D. A., Will, H., and Harris, C. C. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 14707-14712[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Chirillo, P., Pagano, S., Natoli, G., Puri, P. L., Burgio, V. L., Balsano, C., and Levrero, M. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 8162-8167[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Kim, H., Lee, H., and Yun, Y. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 381-385[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Su, F., and Schneider, R. J. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 8744-8749[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Kumar, V., Jayasuryan, N., and Kumar, R. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 5647-5652[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Ritter, S. E., Whitten, T. M., Quets, A. T., and Schloemer, R. H. (1991) Virology 182, 841-845[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Takada, S., and Koike, K. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 5628-5632[Abstract]
25. Fischer, U., Huber, J., Boelens, W. C., Mattaj, I. W., and Luhrmann, R. (1995) Cell 82, 475-483[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Dobbelstein, M., Roth, J., Kimberly, W. T., Levine, A. J., and Shenk, T. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 4276-4284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Ullman, K. S., Powers, M. A., and Forbes, D. J. (1997) Cell 90, 967-970[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Fornerod, M., Ohno, M., Yoshida, M., and Mattaj, I. W. (1997) Cell 90, 1051-1060[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Adachi, Y., and Yanagida, M. (1989) J. Cell Biol. 108, 1195-1207[Abstract]
30. Wilde, A., and Zheng, Y. (1999) Science 284, 1359-1362[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Ohba, T., Nakamura, M., Nishitani, H., and Nishimoto, T. (1999) Science 284, 1356-1358[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Roth, J., Dobbelstein, M., Freedman, D. A., Shenk, T., and Levine, A. J. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 554-564[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Toyoshima, F., Moriguchi, T., Wada, A., Fukuda, M., and Nishida, E. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 2728-2735[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Stade, K., Ford, C. S., Guthrie, C., and Weis, K. (1997) Cell 90, 1041-1050[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Wang, X. W., Vermeulen, W., Coursen, J. D., Gibson, M., Lupold, S. E., Forrester, K., Xu, G., Elmore, L., Yeh, H., Hoeijmakers, J. H. J., and Harris, C. C. (1996) Genes Dev. 10, 1219-1232[Abstract]
36. Scheuer, P. J. (1991) J. Hepatol. 13, 372-374[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Wolff, B., Sanglier, J. J., and Wang, Y. (1997) Chem. Biol. 4, 139-147[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Kuerbitz, S. J., Plunkett, B. S., Walsh, W. V., and Kastan, M. B. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 7491-7495[Abstract]
39. Kudo, N., Khochbin, S., Nishi, K., Kitano, K., Yanagida, M., Yoshida, M., and Horinouchi, S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 29742-29751[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Meyer, M., Caselmann, W. H., Schluter, V., Schreck, R., Hofschneider, P. H., and Baeuerle, P. A. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 2991-3001[Abstract]
41. Cross, J. C., Wen, P., and Rutter, W. J. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 8078-8082[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Tam, W. F., Lee, L. H., Davis, L., and Sen, R. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 2269-2284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Lara-Pezzi, E., Armesilla, A. L., Majano, P. L., Redondo, J. M., and Lopez-Cabrera, M. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 7066-7077[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Rodriguez, M. S., Thompson, J., Hay, R. T., and Dargemont, C. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 9108-9115[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Weil, R., Sirma, H., Giannini, C., Kremsdorf, D., Bessia, C., Dargemont, C., Brechot, C., and Israel, A. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 6345-6354[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. von Lindern, M., van Baal, S., Wiegant, J., Raap, A., Hagemeijer, A., and Grosveld, G. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 3346-3355[Abstract]
47. von Lindern, M., Fornerod, M., van Baal, S., Jaegle, M., de Wit, T., Buijs, A., and Grosveld, G. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 1687-1697[Abstract]
48. Greco, A., Pierotti, M. A., Bongarzone, I., Pagliardini, S., Lanzi, C., and Della Porta, G. (1992) Oncogene 7, 237-242[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Park, M., Dean, M., Cooper, C. S., Schmidt, M., O'Brien, S. J., Blair, D. G., and Vande Woude, G. F. (1986) Cell 45, 895-904[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Soman, N. R., Correa, P., Ruiz, B. A., and Wogan, G. N. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 4892-4896[Abstract]
51. Fornerod, M., van Deursen, J., van Baal, S., Reynolds, A., Davis, D., Murti, K. G., Fransen, J., and Grosveld, G. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 807-816[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52. Bangs, P., Burke, B., Powers, C., Craig, R., Purohit, A., and Doxsey, S. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 143, 1801-1812[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.