From the Department of Biochemistry, Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, Bronx, New York 10461
Received for publication, October 11, 2000, and in revised form, December 14, 2000
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The three-dimensional structures of the inactive
conformations of Hck and Src, members of the Src
protein-tyrosine kinase family, have recently been
described. In both cases, the catalytic domain lies on the
opposite face of the enzyme from the SH2 and SH3 domains. The active
conformation of these enzymes has not yet been described. Given the
known role of the SH2 and SH3 domains in promoting substrate binding,
enzyme activation likely reorients the relative spatial arrangement
between the SH2/SH3 domains and the active site region. We describe
herein a series of "molecular rulers" and their use in assessing
the topological and spatial relationships of the SH2 and active site
regions of the Src protein-tyrosine kinase. These synthetic compounds
contain sequences that are active site-directed
(-Glu-Glu-Ile-Ile-(F5)Phe-, where (F5)Phe
is pentafluorophenylalanine) and SH2-directed
(-Tyr(P)-Glu-Glu-Ile-Glu-), separated by a sequence of variable length.
The most potent bivalent compound,
acetyl-Glu-Glu-Leu-Leu-(F5)Phe-(GABA)3-Tyr(P)-Glu-Glu-Ile-Glu-amide (where GABA is Members of the Src kinase family are composed of a myristoylated N
terminus, followed sequentially by a unique region, the SH3 domain, the
SH2 domain, the catalytic domain, and the C-terminal tail containing a
key regulatory site (Tyr527 by Src tyrosine kinase
numbering) (1). The SH3 and SH2 domains play a number of key roles that
control both the activity of the enzyme as well as its interaction with
other proteins. Both biochemical and recent crystallographic studies
have demonstrated that these domains down-regulate the activity of Src
kinase family members by forming intramolecular contacts with various
sites on the enzyme molecule. In the inactive conformational state, the
SH2 domain is coordinated to the phosphorylated Tyr527
residue on the C-terminal tail, and the SH3 domain is associated with a
proline-rich linker region between the SH2 and catalytic domains
(2-6). These intramolecular binding events disrupt the formation of a
critical salt bridge that is required for the coordination of ATP in
the active site region. By contrast, in the active conformational state, the SH2 and SH3 domains actively promote protein-tyrosine kinase
(PTK)1 activity via the
formation of highly specific intermolecular protein-protein
interactions with appropriate endogenous protein substrates, thereby
docking these substrates to the PTK surface. In addition, the
crystallographic data have led to subsequent studies that focused on
key residues positioned in the sequence that links the catalytic and
SH2 domains. For example, conversion of Trp260 to Ala in
both Hck and Src results in an increase in basal kinase activity (7).
The hydrophobic Trp260 residue not only interacts with the
One of the most striking features of the Hck and Src kinase crystal
structures is the orientation of the SH2 and SH3 domains relative to
the active site region. The latter lies on the face of the enzyme
molecule that is globally opposite to that of its regulatory domain
counterparts. Given the clear role played by the SH2 and SH3 domains in
substrate recognition, it is highly likely that the Src kinase family
members undergo a major structural reorientation upon release from the
catalytically repressed state. Presumably, in the active conformation,
the SH2/SH3 domains are positioned, relative to the active site region,
in a manner that promotes substrate binding in a catalytically
competent fashion. What is the relative spatial orientation of the
active site and SH2 regions in the active form of these enzymes? What
is the preferred relationship (i.e. perpendicular, parallel,
antiparallel, or some variation thereof) between amino acid sequences
that are simultaneously bound to the active site and SH2 domains of
these enzymes? We have addressed these questions by constructing
bivalent ligands that can simultaneously associate with multiple
regions on the Src kinase. These peptide-based species possess an SH2
recognition sequence linked, through a variable length tether of
Materials--
Rink resin, Fmoc-protected amino acid
derivatives, and all reagents for solid-phase peptide synthesis were
obtained from Advanced Chem Tech. Fmoc-Tyr(PO(benzyloxy)OH)-OH
was purchased from Novabiochem. 2-Methoxy-4-alkoxybenzyl alcohol
and
(4-(9- Fmoc-aminoxanthen-3-yloxy)butyryl)-4-methoxybenzhydrylamide resins were obtained from Bachem. All other chemicals were
purchased from Aldrich, except [ Human Recombinant SRC--
Human SRC was purchased from
Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. The enzyme was expressed by recombinant
baculovirus containing the human SRC gene in Sf9
insect cells and purified by the method of Bjorge et al.
(11). The enzyme produced in this manner is not phosphorylated on its
regulatory C-terminal tail (Tyr527) and consequently exists
in an activated state.
Preparation of
H2N-(GABA)n-Glu(OtBu)-Glu(OtBu)-Leu-Leu-(F5)Phe-Resin--
The
protected active site-directed peptide
Fmoc-Glu(OtBu)-Glu(OtBu)-Leu-Leu-(F5)Phe was synthesized on
Rink resin (substitution level = 0.34 mmol/g) utilizing a standard
Fmoc solid-phase synthesis protocol on an Advanced Chem Tech 90 peptide
synthesizer. The N terminus was deprotected, and tether construction
and elongation were accomplished through multiple couplings of
Fmoc- Preparation of
HO2C-(CH2)3-CO-HN-Tyr(PO3H2)-Glu(OtBu)-Glu(OtBu)-Ile-Glu(OtBu)-amide--
The
protected peptide
Fmoc-Tyr(PO3H2)-Glu(OtBu)-Glu(OtBu)-Ile-Glu(OtBu)
was synthesized on
(4-(9-Fmoc-aminoxanthen-3-yloxy)butyryl)-4-methoxybenzhydrylamide resin
(substitution level = 0.40 mmol/g). The N terminus was deprotected and acylated using 5 eq each of glutaric anhydride and
N-methylmorpholine in methylene chloride. The protected
peptide was cleaved from the resin using 1% trifluoroacetic acid in
methylene chloride. Typically, 0.5-1 g of peptide-resin was incubated
with 15 ml of 1% trifluoroacetic acid in methylene chloride for 15 min. The resin was isolated by filtration, and the filtrate was cooled to 0 °C and neutralized by the addition of
N-methylmorpholine. The process was repeated several times
to ensure complete removal of the peptide from the resin. The filtrate
was evaporated to dryness, and the residue was dissolved in a small
amount of methanol. The peptide fragment was precipitated with ethyl
ether and isolated by filtration.
Preparation of Type III Bivalent Inhibitors (Peptides
11-14)--
We employed a segment condensation approach for the
construction of the Type III inhibitors (Fig. 2). Typically, 2 eq of
HO2C-(CH2)3-COHN-Tyr(PO3H2)-Glu(OtBu)-Glu(OtBu)-Ile-Glu(OtBu)-amide was condensed with 300 mg of the amino-terminal deprotected resin-bound peptide
H2N-(GABA)n-Glu(OtBu)-Glu(OtBu)-Leu-Leu-(F5)Phe in the presence of 4 eq of
benzotriazol-1-yloxytripyrrolidinophosphonium hexafluorophosphate and N-hydroxybenzotriazole and 16 eq of
N-methylmorpholine utilizing 2-3 ml of methylene
chloride/N,N-dimethylformamide (1:1) as solvent.
Couplings were allowed to proceed overnight at room temperature. The
completeness of the segment condensations was monitored by the Kaiser
test. Cleavage of the peptides from the resin with concomitant removal
of all side chain-protecting groups was accomplished with 95%
trifluoroacetic acid/H2O. The mixture was filtered, and the
trifluoroacetic acid/H2O was removed under reduced
pressure. The residue was dissolved in H2O, and the pH was
adjusted to between 7 and 8. Crude peptides were purified by
preparative reverse-phase high pressure liquid chromatography on
a C18 column utilizing a linear gradient of
CH3CN/H2O containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic
acid. The appropriate fractions were combined and lyophilized.
Preparation of Type II Bivalent Inhibitors (Peptides
7-10)--
Type II inhibitors were synthesized on Rink resin (0.7 mmol/g) using a standard solid-phase peptide synthesis protocol (10). In this case, Tyr(P) was incorporated into the peptides as the Fmoc-Tyr(PO(benzyloxy)OH)-OH derivative. Peptides were cleaved from the
resin and purified as described above.
Preparation of
Biotin- Kinase Assays--
Assays were performed in triplicate at pH 7.5 in a thermostatted water bath maintained at 30 °C. For the
determination of IC50 values, the following protocol was
employed. Phosphorylation reactions were initiated by the addition of
10 µl of Src kinase from a concentrated stock solution to produce a
final 40-µl solution containing peptide inhibitor concentrations that
varied about their respective IC50 values: 100 µM [ The crystal structures of two members of the Src tyrosine kinase
family, namely Hck and Src, have been solved (12, 13). However, in both
cases, it is the inactive conformation that has been elucidated. In the
catalytically repressed state, the SH2 and SH3 domains lie globally
opposite the ATP- and substrate-binding sites. However, once the
enzyme is activated, the SH2 and SH3 domains serve as key participants
in the recognition and subsequent phosphorylation of intracellular
substrates. Indeed, the importance of the SH2 and SH3 domains in
substrate recognition has been known for some time. For example, amino
acid substitutions in the SH2 and/or SH3 domains of Src family kinases
can modulate cellular transforming activity (14-16). In addition,
although highly effective peptide-based active site-directed substrates
and inhibitors have been repeatedly identified for Ser/Thr-specific
protein kinases (17), analogous active site-directed species have, in
general, proved extremely disappointing for the Tyr-specific protein
kinases (18). One interpretation of these results is that PTKs, such as
those of the Src family, recognize their substrates via SH2 (and other
non-active site-associated) domains, a feature that simple active
site-directed peptide substrates fail to recapitulate. These facts
suggest that the SH2 domain may play a key role in positioning the
protein substrate near the active site region of the Tyr kinase. Under
these circumstances, it is reasonable to assume that the spatial
relationship between the SH2 domain and the active site region
undergoes a dramatic structural reorientation upon generation of the
active enzyme form. In this study, we have examined the topological and
spatial relationships between the SH2 and active site regions of the
active form of the Src kinase using bivalent inhibitors, species that
simultaneously recognize two separate binding sites on PTKs.
The strategy outlined in Fig. 1 employs a
linear tether, composed of GABA amino acid residues, that serves as a
link between SH2- and active site-targeted peptides. Both the active
site and the SH2 domain recognize and bind to specific amino acid
sequences contained within known Src kinase substrates. However, the
highly simplistic illustration in Fig. 1 does not take into account the relative spatial orientation of the active site and the SH2 domain in
the active form of the Src kinase, which is not presently known (12).
For example, the spatial relationship of the active site and the SH2
domain may be such that the N terminus of the active site-directed
peptide lies proximal to the C terminus of the SH2-targeted peptide (or
vice versa). Other scenarios are possible as well. We have designed
four structural variants of the bivalent ligand motif to assess these
possibilities (Fig. 1). The bivalent ligand that is most structurally
complementary to the preferred SH2 domain and active site spatial
relationship in the active form of the Src kinase should serve as the
most potent inhibitory species.
-aminobutyric acid), displays a >120-fold
enhancement in inhibitory potency relative to the simple monovalent
active site-directed species,
acetyl-Glu-Glu-Leu-Leu-(F5)Phe-amide. The short linker
length (3 GABA residues) between the active site- and SH2-directed
peptide fragments suggests that the corresponding domains on the Src
kinase can assume a nearly contiguous spatial arrangement in the active
form of the enzyme.
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
C helix of the catalytic domain, but promotes the formation of the
repressive intramolecular SH2 and SH3 contacts. In an analogous vein,
Leu255 restricts
C helix mobility, thereby blocking
disassembly of the inactive Src kinase conformation (8). We do note
that the structure of the active form of one Src kinase family member, namely Lck, has been determined (9). However, the structure solved in
this case was that of the Lck catalytic domain, which lacks the SH2 and
SH3 regions.
-aminobutyric acid (GABA) residues, to an active site-directed
inhibitory peptide (10). Furthermore, we have prepared bivalent ligands
that not only vary in tether chain length, but in spatial orientation
as well. The results described herein suggest that the SH2 and active site regions of the Src kinase may very well be contiguous in the
active form of the enzyme.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-32P]ATP (PerkinElmer
Life Sciences), bovine serum albumin (Sigma), and ScintiSafe (Fisher).
Phosphocellulose P-81 filter paper was acquired from Whatman, and
SAM2® biotin capture membrane was obtained from
Promega. Enzyme assay solutions were prepared with deionized/distilled
H2O.
-aminobutyric acid. Aliquots of peptidyl resin were removed at
the appropriate time in the synthetic sequence to provide tethers
containing the desired number of
-aminobutyric acid residues. The
N-terminal Fmoc group was removed from each aliquot just prior to
segment coupling.
-aminocaproyl-Tyr(PO3H2)-Glu-Glu-Ile-Glu-(GABA)6-Glu-Glu-Leu-Leu-Tyr-amide--
This
Src bivalent peptide substrate was synthesized as previously
described (10).
-32P]ATP (500-1000 cpm/pmol), 30 µM
Arg-Arg-Arg-Arg-Arg-Ala-Glu-Glu-Glu-Glu-Tyr-NH(CH2)2C6H5 substrate, 50 mM Tris, 10 mM MgCl2,
0.2 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, and 1.10 nM Src kinase.
Reactions were terminated after 20 min by spotting 25-µl aliquots
onto 2.1-cm diameter phosphocellulose paper discs. After 10 s, the
discs were immersed in 10% glacial acetic acid and allowed to soak
with occasional stirring for 1 h. The acetic acid was decanted,
and the discs were collectively washed with 4 volumes of 0.5%
H3PO4 and 1 volume of water, followed by a
final acetone rinse. The discs were air-dried, placed in plastic
scintillation vials containing 3 ml of ScintiSafe, and subjected to
scintillation counting for radioactivity.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
General structures of Src kinase-targeted
bivalent ligands. The bivalent inhibitors prepared in this
study possess SH2- and active site-directed fragments that can
simultaneously associate with the SH2 and active site regions of the
Src kinase. Type I-IV bivalent ligands are defined by the relative
orientations of the SH2- and active site-targeted fragments.
In the bivalent ligand of the general form I, the C terminus of the SH2-targeted fragment is covalently appended to the N terminus of the active site-directed fragment via a linear tether composed of even multiples of GABA. Ligand II, a variant of ligand I, possesses an analogous arrangement, except that the active site-directed peptide fragment is positioned at the N terminus of the bivalent ligand. The individual peptide fragments in both ligands I and II (i.e. active site- and SH2-directed) are oriented parallel with respect to one another. The SH2-targeted fragment, -Tyr(P)-Glu-Glu-Ile-, is derived from the SH2 recognition motif present in the hamster polyoma virus middle T antigen (19). Peptides based upon this sequence typically display KD values in the 1-5 µM range for the SH2 domains of Src kinase family members (20). The active site-directed fragment, -Glu-Glu-Leu-Leu-(F5)Phe-, was chosen based on results obtained from a synthetic library study that identified the unnatural pentafluorophenylalanine residue as a non-phosphorylatable Tyr surrogate (21). Ac-Glu-Glu-Leu-Leu-(F5)Phe-amide (peptide 1) is a poor inhibitor (IC50 = 1.59 ± 0.17 mM), displaying an affinity for the Src kinase active site that is ~3 orders of magnitude less than that exhibited by Ac-Tyr(P)-Glu-Glu-Ile-amide for the corresponding SH2 domain. Consequently, the SH2-targeted sequence represents the high affinity component of the bivalent ligand.
The individual peptide fragments in bivalent ligands III and IV are oriented in an antiparallel fashion. This arrangement requires a reversal in tether polarity, which was accomplished via the incorporation of a glutaric acid residue into the tether (see below). Since the SH2- and active site-directed sequences in ligands III and IV run in opposite directions, the standard written convention of an amino acid sequence (i.e. H2N-X1-X2 ... Xn-CO2H) does not apply. To emphasize the unconventional nature of the bivalent ligands III and IV, the individual three-letter amino acid abbreviations are written backwards for those sequences that run from the C to the N terminus (e.g. -elI-ulG-ulG-(P)ryT-) (Table I).
|
We have previously described the synthesis and inhibitory activity of
the bivalent inhibitor family I (peptides 2-6) (10). The Type II
inhibitor family (peptides 7-10) was prepared using a standard
solid-phase synthesis Fmoc protocol. The tether that links the SH2- and
active site-directed peptide fragments consists of even multiples of
(GABA)n, where n = 2, 4, 6, and 8. The Type III
inhibitors (illustrated in Fig. 1) possess SH2 and active site
recognition sequences that run in opposite directions. The N termini of
both sequences are directly attached to the GABA-based tether. The
synthesis of the Type III peptides is depicted in Fig.
2. The resin-appended active
site-targeted component (-Glu-Glu-Leu-Leu-(F5)Phe-Rink resin) was prepared using a standard Fmoc solid-phase protocol. The
peptide-resin was ultimately split into four separate portions containing 1, 3, 5, and 7 GABA units positioned on the N terminus of
Glu-Glu-Leu-Leu-(F5)Phe-Rink resin. The SH2-directed
peptide fragment
(HO2C(CH2)3CONH-Tyr(P)-Glu-Glu-Ile-Glu-amide)
was separately synthesized on the methoxybenzhydrylamide resin and
subsequently cleaved from the resin under mild conditions to retain the
side chain-protecting groups. The N-terminal glutaric acid moiety of HO2C(CH2)3CONH-Tyr(P)-Glu-Glu-Ile-Glu-amide
was activated with benzotriazol-1-yloxytripyrrolidinophosphonium
hexafluorophosphate/N-hydroxybenzotriazole and then
condensed with (GABA)n-Glu-Glu-Leu-Leu-(F5)Phe-Rink resin. Peptides 11-14 were obtained following simultaneous cleavage from the resin and side chain deprotection. For reasons to be discussed
below, Type IV inhibitors were not synthesized in this study.
|
A clear relationship between tether length and inhibitory potency for
Type I inhibitors is evident from Fig. 3
(also see Table I). The most effective species in this family of
inhibitors contains a tether length of 8 GABA units (Type I, peptide
4). This indicates that, for optimal Src kinase binding, Tyr(P) (SH2
region) and (F5)Phe (active site region) are positioned at
a considerable linear distance from each other along the
bivalent peptide chain (i.e.
-Tyr(P)-Glu-Glu-Ile-Glu-(GABA)n-Glu-Glu-Ile-Ile-(F5)Phe- for a total of 16 residues, i.e. >40 Å in an extended
conformation). The simplest interpretation of this result is that the
SH2 (i.e. the site that binds Tyr(P)) and active site
(i.e. the site that binds (F5)Phe) regions of
the Src kinase are separated by a significant molecular distance, an
interpretation that is consistent with the crystal structure of the
catalytically inactive Src kinase. However, these data do not
necessarily rule out the possibility that the active site and SH2
regions are proximal to each other. For example, the structural nature
of the Type I inhibitors may require that the GABA tether assume a
loop-like conformation so that the active site- and SH2-directed
fragments can associate with their targeted Src kinase regions in a
structurally compatible fashion. To address this possibility, we
prepared the Type II and III analogs of Type I. We chose to limit the
tether length in these bivalent ligand families to a maximum of 8 GABA
(or 7 GABA and 1 glutaric acid) units. The rationale for this decision was based upon the fact that those Type I inhibitors that possess tether lengths of 10 or more GABA subunits display a significant loss
in inhibitory activity (Table I). This suggests that SH2- and active
site-targeted peptide fragments that are separated by relatively long
linker lengths act independently of each other.
|
The results obtained with the Type II and III inhibitors are provided in Table I (and graphically illustrated in Fig. 3). The monovalent peptide 1 exhibits an IC50 value of 1.6 mM, which is consistent with the poor inhibitory efficacy generally observed with simple active site-directed peptides targeted against Tyr-specific protein kinases. The best of the Type I inhibitors displays an 85-fold enhanced inhibitory potency for the Src kinase relative to peptide 1. Furthermore, there is a clear correlation between inhibitory efficacy and GABA chain length. By contrast, the most potent Type III inhibitor is little more than 8-fold better than the active site-directed control peptide 1. In addition, there is a clear absence of any relationship between inhibitory potency and GABA chain length. In an optimized bivalent ligand, the high affinity SH2-directed fragment should deliver the peptides to the Src kinase at or better than low micromolar concentrations. The results imply that the overall structural arrangement of the SH2- and active site-targeted fragments on Type III inhibitors is not complementary to the relative spatial orientation of the SH2 and active site modules on the enzyme surface. Under these circumstances, kinase inhibition likely occurs only if the bivalent peptides assume a less than energetically favorable enzyme-bound conformation, which would account for the modest inhibitory profile of the Type III class of inhibitors. By contrast, the results obtained for the Type II inhibitors reveal an obvious trend. Inhibitory potency improves as a function of increasing tether length up to 4 GABA residues (36 µM). Peptide 8 is a 46-fold more potent inhibitor of Src kinase than peptide 1. Inhibitory potency appears to plateau at a tether length of 6 GABA units, with peptides 9 and 10 being equipotent.
Previous studies have demonstrated that simple peptides with a special affinity for either the SH2 or SH3 domain promote the catalytic activity of Src kinase family members. For example, Miller and co-workers (22) have shown that the SH2 ligand, Tyr(P)-Glu-Glu-Ile, enhances the catalytic activity of Hck by 2.5-fold as assessed by the phosphorylation of the simple monovalent active site-directed peptide Arg-Arg-Leu-Ile-Glu-Asp-Ala-His-Tyr-Ala-Ala-Arg-Gly. The physical interpretation of this observation is that the Tyr(P)-bearing peptide partially releases the enzyme from its catalytically repressed state, a state in which the SH2 domain is intramolecularly associated with phosphorylated Tyr527. Furthermore, Miller and co-workers have demonstrated that peptides bearing the -Tyr(P)-Glu-Glu-Ile- motif specifically associate only with the SH2-binding region of the Src kinase, an observation that is true with v-Src as well, the constitutively active form of the Src kinase (23). Based upon these previously reported observations, the enhanced affinity displayed by the bivalent inhibitors described in this report is likely due to the simultaneous occupancy of both SH2 and active site regions. If SH2 domain occupancy is the key component of bivalent ligand activity, then any species that specifically occludes the SH2 domain should also reduce the inhibitory potency of these bivalent ligands. As noted above, the -Tyr(P)-Glu-Glu-Ile- sequence associates only with the SH2 domain (and no other region and/or site) of the Src kinase. Indeed, in the presence of 300 µM Ac-Tyr(P)-Glu-Glu-Ile, the IC50 of peptide 8 is markedly impaired (180 ± 10 µM versus 35 ± 2 µM in the absence of the Tyr(P) peptide).
Can inhibitors more potent than peptide 8 be constructed by fine-tuning
the tether length even further? We prepared peptides 15 and 16, species
that contain 3 and 5 GABA units, respectively. As is evident from Table
I, peptide 15 is the best of the bivalent Src kinase inhibitors
prepared to date, displaying an IC50 value nearly 120-fold
better than peptide 1. Clearly, an array of additional refinements are
possible, such as replacing a single GABA subunit in the tether
contained in peptide 15 with 5-aminovaleric acid (one carbon more than
GABA), -alanine (one carbon less than GABA), or glycine (two carbons
less than GABA), which will alter the overall tether length by a few
angstroms. However, as is evident from the results displayed in Table
I, the potency of the bivalent inhibitors appear to be asymptotically
approaching the known affinity of the -Tyr(P)-Glu-Glu-Ile-
SH2-targeting sequence contained within all of these inhibitors.
The identification of Type II peptide 15 as an effective inhibitor of Src kinase provides insight into the spatial relationship between the SH2 and active site regions of the active enzyme form. The optimal tether length for Type I inhibitors is 8 GABA residues. Furthermore, the overall distance between the Tyr(P) moiety in the SH2-directed segment and (F5)Phe in the active site-directed segment is considerable. If the 8 GABA residue-containing peptide 4 assumes an extended conformation when bound to the enzyme surface, one could draw the conclusion that the Tyr(P) and (F5)Phe recognition sites are separated by >40 Å. However, by reorienting the SH2 and active site-directed sequences, we have obtained a peptide (peptide 15) in which the tether length has been more than halved. Perhaps even more noteworthy is the dramatic reduction in the distance between the critical Tyr(P) moiety of the SH2 recognition sequence and the key pentafluorophenylalanine Tyr surrogate of the active site-directed sequence. This is abundantly clear by comparing the best Type II inhibitor, peptide 15 (IC50 = 13.4 µM), with its Type I counterpart, peptide 4 (IC50 = 18.5 µM). The distance between Tyr(P) and (F5)Phe in peptide 4 is 16 amino acid residues. By contrast, this distance is only 3 residues in peptide 15. Indeed, even if peptide 15 assumes an extended conformation when enzyme-bound, the distance between the key Tyr(P) and (F5)Phe recognition sites is ~10-12 Å. This strongly implies that the catalytic and SH2 regions of the Src kinase undergo a considerable structural reorganization as the enzyme assumes the catalytically active state. Furthermore, the modest linear distance between the key Tyr(P) and (F5)Phe moieties in peptide 15 suggests that the SH2 and active site regions can assume a nearly contiguous spatial arrangement in the catalytically active form of the enzyme, implying that the -Tyr(P)-Glu-Glu-Ile-binding portion of the SH2 domain could very well serve as an extension of the active site region itself.
In addition to the inhibitors described in this study, Type IV ligands could have been examined. Like their Type III counterparts, Type IV compounds contain SH2 and active site recognition elements that are oriented antiparallel to each other (Fig. 1). However, it is the C termini of these recognition elements, rather than the N termini, that are appended to the GABA-based tether. This relative orientation assures that the critical Tyr(P)-to-(F5)Phe distance will always be greater for the Type IV analogs than that obtained with peptide 15. Consequently, we chose not to explore the preparation of this class of bivalent inhibitor.
Finally, we note that the bivalent approach outlined herein represents an alternative strategy for the acquisition of potentially selective and potent Tyr kinase inhibitors. The majority of the peptide-based active site-directed inhibitors described to date have been prepared by replacing the phosphorylatable tyrosine residue with a phenylalanine moiety. This approach has, in general, led to the production of relatively poor inhibitory species. A portion of the poor inhibitory activity of these compounds can be attributed to the missing phenolic hydroxyl, which likely facilitates productive active site interactions. Indeed, the most potent peptide-based active site-directed PTK inhibitors are those in which the phosphorylatable tyrosine has been replaced by a non-phosphorylatable phenolic analog such as L-Dopa (24) or tetrafluorotyrosine (25). In addition, the low affinity displayed by simple active site-directed peptides may be due to the fact that they fail to reproduce the mechanism by which intact endogenous protein substrates are recognized by PTKs (i.e. via non-active site regions such as SH2 domains (1, 26, 27)). In short, the Tyr(P)-SH2 domain interactions occur with a significantly higher affinity than those that transpire in the active site region. Based on this notion, Miller and co-workers (28) have investigated the Hck-catalyzed phosphorylation of peptide substrates possessing an SH2 recognition sequence. The most potent of these substrates display as much as a 10-fold reduction in their Km value relative to peptides that lack the Tyr(P)-bearing SH2 recognition element, which presumably reflects the enhanced binding of the peptides to the Hck surface (28). Cowburn and co-workers (29) have constructed "consolidated ligands" that simultaneously bind to the SH2 and SH3 domains of the Abelson PTK with enhanced affinity. Recently, these investigators also prepared subfamilies of these ligands that contain different relative orientations of the SH2- and SH3-directed sequences (30). The general structure of their tightest binding ligand is (SH2-directed ligand)-tether-(SH3-directed ligand), where the tether is composed of 7 Gly residues. Since members of the Src kinase family also contain SH3 domains, it may be possible to ultimately prepare trivalent ligands that are able to simultaneously associate with the three key binding domains of PTKs. Finally, we note that Pluskey and co-workers (31) tethered two phosphotyrosyl peptides together via aminohexanoic acid linkages to produce bivalent ligands that bind to the two SH2 domains of SH-PTP2. The latter were found to stimulate catalytic activity in a more pronounced fashion than simple monovalent SH2-targeted phosphopeptides. As noted above, simple monovalent ligands that associate with the SH2 or SH3 regulatory sites of Src kinase family members often promote enhanced enzymatic activity. By contrast, the bivalent inhibitors described in this study behave in a decidedly different fashion. These species are both bivalent and bifunctional. Not only do these peptides coordinate to the SH2 domain of Src, which should block the assembly of Src-based signaling complexes, but they shut down the catalytic activity of the enzyme as well.
In summary, we have employed bivalent ligands to investigate the
distance and spatial relationships between the SH2 and active site
regions of the Src PTK. The most potent bivalent species identified in
this study is peptide 15, which indicates that there is a
high degree of structural complementarity between the sequence
arrangement in peptide 15 and the preferred active conformation of the
Src kinase itself. The close linear proximity of the key Tyr(P) and
(F5)Phe residues in peptide 15 implies that the SH2 domain
may very well serve as an extension of the active site when the Src
kinase assumes the active, catalytically competent, conformational state.
![]() |
FOOTNOTES |
---|
* This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health and the Comprehensive Cancer Center of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Recipient of an UNCF/Merck postdoctoral fellowship.
§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry, Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, 1300 Morris Park Ave., Bronx, NY 10461. Tel.: 718-430-8641; Fax: 718-430-8565; E-mail: dlawrenc@aecom.yu.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 15, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M009262200
![]() |
ABBREVIATIONS |
---|
The abbreviations used are:
PTK, protein-tyrosine kinase;
GABA, -aminobutyric acid;
Fmoc, N-(9-fluorenyl)methoxycarbonyl;
OtBu, t-butoxy;
(F5)Phe, pentafluorophenylalanine;
Ac, acetyl.
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
1. | Brown, M. T., and Cooper, J. A. (1996) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1287, 121-149[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
2. | Schindler, T., Sicheri, F., Pico, A., Gazit, A., Levitzki, A., and Kuriyan, J. (1999) Mol. Cell 3, 639-648[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
3. | Sicheri, F., Moarefi, I., and Kuriyan, J. (1997) Nature 385, 602-609[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
4. | Williams, J. C., Weijland, A., Gonfloni, S., Thompson, A., Courtneidge, S. A., Superti-Furga, G., and Wierenga, R. K. (1997) J. Mol. Biol. 274, 757-775[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
5. | Xu, W., Doshi, A., Lei, M., Eck, M. J., and Harrison, S. C. (1999) Mol. Cell 3, 629-638[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
6. | Xu, W., Harrison, S. C., and Eck, M. J. (1997) Nature 385, 595-602[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
7. |
LaFevre-Bernt, M.,
Sicheri, F.,
Pico, A.,
Porter, M.,
Kuriyan, J.,
and Miller, W. T.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
32129-32134 |
8. | Gonfloni, S., Frischknecht, F., Way, M., and Superti-Furga, G. (1999) Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 760-764[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
9. | Yamaguchi, H., and Hendrickson, W. A. (1996) Nature 384, 484-489[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
10. | Profit, A. A., Lee, T. R., and Lawrence, D. S. (1999) J Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 280-283[CrossRef] |
11. |
Bjorge, J. D.,
Bellagamba, C.,
Cheng, H. C.,
Tanaka, A.,
Wang, J. H.,
and Fujita, D. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
24222-24228 |
12. | Sicheri, F., and Kuriyan, J. (1997) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7, 777-785[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
13. | Superti-Furga, G., and Gonfloni, S. (1997) Bioessays 19, 447-450[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
14. | Hirai, H., and Varmus, H. E. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 8592-8596[Abstract] |
15. | Hirai, H., and Varmus, H. E. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 1307-1318[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
16. | Nemeth, S. P., Fox, L. G., DeMarco, M., and Brugge, J. S. (1989) Mol. Cell. Biol. 9, 1109-1119[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
17. | Pinna, L. A., and Ruzzene, M. (1996) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1314, 191-225[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
18. | Lawrence, D. S., and Niu, J. (1998) Pharmacol. Ther. 77, 81-114[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
19. | Songyang, Z., Shoelson, S. E., Chaudhuri, M., Gish, G., Pawson, T., Haser, W. G., King, F., Roberts, T., Ratnofsky, S., Lechleider, R. J., Neel, B. G., Birge, R. B., Fajardo, J. E., Chou, M. M., Hanatusa, H., Schaffhausen, B., and Cantley, L. C. (1993) Cell 72, 767-778[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
20. | Lee, T. R., and Lawrence, D. S. (1999) J. Med. Chem. 42, 784-787[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
21. |
Niu, J.,
and Lawrence, D. S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
1493-1499 |
22. | Moarefi, I., LaFevre-Bernt, M., Sicheri, F., Huse, M., Lee, C. H., Kuriyan, J., and Miller, W. T. (1997) Nature 385, 650-653[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
23. |
Garcia, P.,
Shoelson, S. E.,
Drew, J. S.,
and Miller, W. T.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
30574-30579 |
24. | Niu, J., and Lawrence, D. S. (1997) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 3844-3845[CrossRef] |
25. |
Yuan, C. J.,
Jakes, S.,
Elliott, S.,
and Graves, D. J.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
16205-16209 |
26. | Courtneidge, S. A. (1994) Semin. Cancer Biol. 5, 239-246[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
27. | Shokat, K. M. (1995) Chem. Biol. 2, 509-514[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
28. |
Pellicena, P.,
Stowell, K. R.,
and Miller, W. T.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
15325-15328 |
29. |
Cowburn, D.,
Zheng, J.,
Xu, Q.,
and Barany, G.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
26738-26741 |
30. | Xu, Q., Zheng, J., Xu, R., Barany, G., and Cowburn, D. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 3491-3497[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
31. |
Pluskey, S.,
Wandless, T. J.,
Walsh, C. T.,
and Shoelson, S. E.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
2897-2900 |
|
HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
Journal of Lipid Research | Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education |