DNA Structure and Aspartate 276 Influence Nucleotide Binding to Human DNA Polymerase beta

IMPLICATION FOR THE IDENTITY OF THE RATE-LIMITING CONFORMATIONAL CHANGE*

Brian J. Vande Berg, William A. Beard, and Samuel H. WilsonDagger

From the Laboratory of Structural Biology, NIEHS, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709

Received for publication, April 5, 2000, and in revised form, October 4, 2000



    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Structures of DNA polymerase (pol) beta  bound to single-nucleotide gapped DNA had revealed that the lyase and pol domains form a "doughnut-shaped" structure altering the dNTP binding pocket in a fashion that is not observed when bound to non-gapped DNA. We have investigated dNTP binding to pol beta -DNA complexes employing steady-state and pre-steady-state kinetics. Although pol beta  has a kinetic scheme similar to other DNA polymerases, polymerization by pol beta  is limited by at least two partially rate-limiting steps: a conformational change after dNTP ground-state binding and product release. The equilibrium binding constant, Kd(dNTP), decreased and the insertion efficiency increased with a one-nucleotide gapped DNA substrate, as compared with non-gapped DNA. Valine substitution for Asp276, which interacts with the base of the incoming nucleotide, increased the binding affinity for the incoming nucleotide indicating that the negative charge contributed by Asp276 weakens binding and that an interaction between residue 276 with the incoming nucleotide occurs during ground-state binding. Since the interaction between Asp276 and the nascent base pair is observed only in the "closed" conformation of pol beta , the increased free energy in ground-state binding for the mutant suggests that the subsequent rate-limiting conformational change is not the "open" to "closed" structural transition, but instead is triggered in the closed pol conformation.



    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Proficient DNA repair systems are critical to maintaining the stability of the human genome. Many forms of endogenous base damage, including alkylation, oxidation, and deamination, result in the formation of abasic sites. In particular, normal and damaged DNA bases are lost spontaneously or removed by lesion-specific DNA glycosylases. The resulting abasic sites are repaired by the base excision repair (BER)1 pathway to prevent the accumulation of this miscoding lesion. Following base removal, apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease incises the damaged strand 5' to the abasic site, leaving a single-nucleotide gap with a 5'-deoxyribose phosphate (dRP) flap. The gap is then processed by DNA polymerase (pol) beta  to create nicked DNA that will be ligated by DNA ligase I or III. DNA polymerase beta  possesses both the nucleotidyltransferase activity to fill the one-nucleotide gap and lyase activity required to remove the dRP flap. The central role of pol beta  in BER has been established (1, 2), and, in the absence of pol beta , alternate BER pathways have been reported (3, 4).

DNA polymerase beta  is an attractive model to study polymerase mechanisms employed to assure efficient and faithful DNA synthesis. Its small size and lack of accessory proteins has facilitated its biochemical, kinetic, and structural characterization. Although pol beta  appears to have evolved separately from other classes of DNA/RNA polymerases of known structure (5), it shares many general structural and mechanistic features. Each of the polymerases possesses a groove along a broad face of the enzyme where nucleic acid binds. The polymerase domain of these enzymes has been likened to a right hand and is composed of finger, palm, and thumb subdomains (6). Polymerases have at least two acidic residues in the palm subdomain that bind catalytically essential metals. The crystal structures of the substrate complexes of pol beta  (7, 8), T7 DNA polymerase (9), Klentaq DNA polymerase (10), and HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (11) indicate that the reactive groups (i.e. metals, dNTP, and template-primer) have a similar three-dimensional arrangement. These structures are consistent with a "two metal ion" mechanism for nucleotidyl transfer (12).

In general, pol beta  also utilizes a similar kinetic mechanism as most other DNA polymerases. Steady-state kinetic analyses indicate that pol beta  follows an ordered addition of substrates (13). Employing pre-steady-state kinetics, it has been shown that Escherichia coli Klenow fragment (14, 15), T4 DNA polymerase (15, 16), T7 DNA polymerase (17), HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (18), and pol beta  (19) utilize a two-step nucleotide binding mechanism. Initial dNTP binding to a pol-DNA complex places the nucleotide within the active site. A subsequent conformational change results in the alignment of the catalytic atoms and rapid chemistry. Binding of the correct nucleotide facilitates this conformational change, whereas binding of the incorrect nucleotide does not. This "induced-fit" mechanism is consistent with the numerous structural differences that are observed upon binding of a correct nucleotide (8). In particular, the carboxyl-terminal subdomain (residues 262-335) is observed to reposition itself after binding a correct dNTP by rotation about an axis, alpha -helix M, that positions alpha -helix N so that several side chains can interact with the nascent base pair in this "closed" conformation.

Replicative DNA polymerases and reverse transcriptases often have an intrinsically associated exonuclease or endonuclease activity that complements their fundamental nucleotidyltransferase function. DNA polymerase beta  also has an associated accessory activity that complements its DNA synthesis step in BER. Mild proteolysis of pol beta  separates a 31-kDa fragment, which possesses the nucleotidyltransferase activity, from an amino-terminal 8-kDa fragment (20). This smaller domain binds strongly to 5'-phosphate groups in gapped DNA (21) and possesses the dRP lyase activity that is needed for removal of the dRP flap remaining after AP endonuclease cleavage of the abasic site intermediate in BER (22, 23). In the absence of a downstream DNA strand (i.e. no DNA gap), a crystal structure of a pol beta -DNA-ddNTP complex revealed that the 8-kDa domain does not interact with the DNA or the 31-kDa domain, but instead is positioned some distance from the 31-kDa domain (Fig. 1A). The crystal structure of pol beta  bound to one-nucleotide gapped DNA demonstrates that the 8-kDa domain binds to the 5'-phosphate in the DNA gap and interacts with the carboxyl terminus of the 31-kDa domain (Fig. 1A) (8). This results in a more compact, doughnut-shaped structure forming a channel with dimensions appropriate for dNTP diffusion (Fig. 1B) (24). Thus, this conformation of the 8-kDa domain is potentially significant due to its proximity to the nucleotide binding pocket of pol beta . The experiments described here were performed to examine nucleotide binding to pol beta  and to ascertain the influence of a gapped DNA structure. Additionally, the role of Asp276 and alpha -helix N in dNTP binding was investigated by comparing the effect of valine substitution for Asp276 on nucleotide binding with alternate DNA substrates. Asp276 is observed to form van der Waals contact with the base of the incoming nucleotide triphosphate in the closed pol beta  ternary substrate complex. Employing steady-state and pre-steady-state kinetics, we examine nucleotide binding to pol beta . The results indicate that residue 276 interactions with the incoming nucleotide influence ground-state nucleotide binding during template base recognition. The implication is that alpha -helix N and Asp276 influence ground-state binding in the closed conformation that occurs prior to the rate-limiting conformational change and that subdomain closure is very rapid and not rate-limiting.



View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Structure of DNA polymerase beta  bound to DNA and ddCTP. A, the palm subdomain of DNA polymerase beta  (yellow ribbon) bound to non-gapped DNA (data not shown) (7) is superimposed with the palm of pol beta  (blue-green 31-kDa pol domain and white 8-kDa lyase domain) bound to a one-nucleotide gapped DNA (8). The template strand of the one-nucleotide gapped DNA is red, while the primer and downstream strands are pink. The pink incoming ddCTP is illustrated in a Corey-Pauling-Koltun representation and identifies the 3'-primer terminus. The 8-kDa domain of pol beta  bound to non-gapped DNA does not interact with DNA, but instead is positioned some distance from the 31-kDa domain. A transparent molecular surface of pol beta  that is bound to the one-nucleotide gapped DNA substrate is shown and illustrates the doughnut-shaped structure of pol beta  in this conformation. B, a view of the channel that is formed when the amino-terminal 8-kDa lyase domain (white) interacts with the carboxyl terminus of the 31-kDa pol domain (blue-green). This channel has dimensions appropriate for dNTP diffusion (24). This figure was made with GRASP (60) and Molscript (61) and rendered with Raster3D (62).



    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- Ultrapure deoxynucleoside triphosphates, [gamma -32P]ATP, [alpha -32P]dCTP, [alpha -thio]dCTP, and MicroSpin G-25 columns were from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. DE-81 filters were from Whatman.

A 34-mer oligonucleotide substrate containing a single nucleotide gap was prepared by annealing three gel-purified oligonucleotides (Oligos Etc., Wilsonville, OR) to create a gap at position 16. Each oligonucleotide was resuspended in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, and 1 mM EDTA, and the concentration determined from their UV absorbance at 260 nm. The annealing reactions were carried out by incubating a solution of 10 µM primer with 11 µM each of downstream and template oligonucleotides at 90 °C for 2 min followed by slow cooling to room temperature. The sequence of the gapped DNA substrate was as follows: primer, 5'-CTGCAGCTGATGCGC-3'; downstream oligonucleotide, 5'-GTACGGATCCCCGGGTAC-3'; template, 3'-GACGTCGACTACGCGGCATGCCTAGGGGCCCATG-5'.

The upstream primer in each case was 5'-labeled with [gamma -32P]ATP (specific activity = 6.6 × 106 dpm/pmol) using T4 polynucleotide kinase (New England Biolabs) and contaminating radioactive ATP was removed with a MicroSpin G-25 column. The downstream primer was synthesized with a 5'-phosphate. A non-gapped DNA substrate was prepared by omitting the downstream oligonucleotide. A nicked substrate was prepared by annealing a 16-mer primer, where the 15-mer primer had a dCMP added to the 3'-end, and downstream oligonucleotide with template as described above.

Human recombinant pol beta  (wild type and D276V) was overexpressed in Escherichia coli cells and purified as described (25). The enzyme concentration was determined from the absorbance at 280 nm using an extinction coefficient of 21,200 cm-1 M-1 (26).

Kinetic Assays-- Rapid-quench assays were performed at 37 °C using a KinTek Model RQF-3 rapid-quench-flow apparatus (KinTek Corp., Austin, TX). Unless noted otherwise, all concentrations refer to the final concentration after mixing. The final reaction mixture typically consisted of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2, 100 mM KCl, 100 µg/ml bovine serum albumin, 10% glycerol, and 5 mM MgCl2. The final concentration of enzyme and substrates are given in the text or figure legends.

Enzyme and substrate DNA were preincubated for 1 min and rapidly mixed with dCTP and MgCl2 to initiate each reaction. After various time periods, reactions were stopped by the addition of 0.25 M EDTA. The quenched samples were mixed with an equal volume of formamide dye and the products separated on 12% denaturing polyacrylamide gels. The dried gels were analyzed using a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics) to quantify product formation. Steady-state time courses were measured by manual mixing and quenching at 37 °C to determine steady-state constants (i.e. apparent kcat and Km). Following the appropriate incubation period, individual reactions were quenched with EDTA and the quenched reaction mixtures were applied to DEAE cellulose filters (DE-81). The unincorporated [alpha -32P]dCTP was removed, and radioactive nucleotide incorporation was quantified as described previously (27).

Pyrophosphorolysis-- A nicked DNA substrate (300 nM) was preincubated with 1 nM pol beta  in reaction buffer. The reaction was initiated by the addition of 3 mM pyrophosphate and 5 mM MgCl2. The reaction was quenched at various time periods with EDTA.

Data Analysis-- Time courses were fitted to appropriate equations by nonlinear least squares methods. These equations are described under "Results." Progress curves were also fitted to kinetic models with KinTekSim, which is based on the programs KINSIM (28) and FITSIM (29).


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Influence of DNA Structure on Steady-state Efficiency of dCTP Incorporation-- The efficiency of correct nucleotide (i.e. dCTP) incorporation by pol beta  was dependent on the nature of the template-primer (Table I). DNA polymerase beta  catalyzed single-nucleotide gap filling at a steady-state rate of 0.8 s-1. A similar rate of polymerization was observed when pol beta  was bound to non-gapped DNA (i.e. the downstream oligonucleotide was omitted from the annealing reaction). In contrast, the dCTP concentration dependence of DNA synthesis indicated that Km(dCTP) with a single nucleotide gap DNA substrate was 12-fold lower than for a substrate without a gap (Table I), suggesting that the enzyme might possibly have a higher affinity for nucleotide when bound to gapped DNA. As a result of the lower Km, catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km(dCTP)) was over an order of magnitude greater for the gapped DNA substrate assayed under steady-state conditions than for the non-gapped DNA substrate.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Steady-state kinetic constants for wild-type pol beta -DNA complexes
Gapped and non-gapped DNAs (300 nM) were preincubated with 1 nM pol beta  prior to addition of dCTP. Initial velocity data were fitted to the Michaelis equation by nonlinear least squares methods.

Equilibrium Nucleotide Binding-- Since steady-state kinetic parameters are often the composite of several rate constants, we sought to determine the equilibrium constant (Kd) for nucleotide binding to pol beta -DNA. Using rapid-mixing and quenching techniques, we measured pre-steady-state product formation. When a high concentration of pol beta  is preincubated with excess single-nucleotide gapped DNA (DNA/enzyme = 3) and rapidly mixed with a high concentration of the complementary nucleoside triphosphate (i.e. dCTP) and Mg2+, product formation is biphasic. A rapid burst of product formation precedes a slower apparent linear rate (Fig. 2, dashed line). The biphasic nature of the time course indicates that a step following chemistry is rate-limiting during steady-state catalysis. The slow step has been attributed to dissociation of the extended pol-DNA complex (19). The rates of product formation observed in Fig. 2 indicate that in contrast to processive replicative polymerases, kpol is not considerably greater than koff(DNA+1) for pol beta . Scheme I describes the basic kinetic mechanism for single-nucleotide incorporation utilized by all DNA polymerases that have been examined. Following an ordered binding of substrate DNA and dNTP, a conformational change (kpol) precedes rapid chemistry (see below). Pyrophosphate release is rapid, but dissociation of the extended product DNA is usually slow and at least partially rate-limiting.
<UP>Pol</UP>+<UP>DNA</UP> <LIM><OP><ARROW>⇄</ARROW></OP><LL>k<SUB><UP>off</UP>(<UP>DNA</UP>)</SUB></LL><UL>k<SUB><UP>on</UP></SUB></UL></LIM><UP> Pol<SUB>DNA</SUB></UP>+<UP>dNTP</UP> <LIM><OP><ARROW>⇄</ARROW></OP><UL>K<SUB>d</SUB></UL></LIM> <UP>Pol</UP><SUP><UP>dNTP</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>DNA</UP></SUB> <LIM><OP><ARROW>→</ARROW></OP><UL>k<SUB><UP>pol</UP></SUB></UL></LIM> 

<UP>PP<SUB>i</SUB></UP>+<UP>Pol<SUB>DNA+1</SUB></UP> <LIM><OP><ARROW>⇄</ARROW></OP><LL>k<SUB><UP>on</UP></SUB></LL><UL>k<SUB><UP>off</UP>(<UP>DNA+1</UP>)</SUB></UL></LIM><UP> Pol</UP>+<UP>DNA<SUB>+1</SUB></UP>

<UP><SC>Scheme</SC> I</UP>
Since dNTP binding is in rapid equilibrium, kpol is dependent on dNTP concentration and is given by Equation 1.
k<SUB><UP>obs</UP></SUB>=k<SUB><UP>pol</UP></SUB>[<UP>dNTP</UP>]/(K<SUB>d</SUB>+[<UP>dNTP</UP>]) (Eq. 1)
Fitting the time course in Fig. 2 to an equation with rising exponential and linear terms, as shown by Equation 2,
<UP>Product</UP>=A{1−e<SUP>−k<SUB><UP>obs</UP></SUB>t</SUP>}+v<SUB><UP>ss</UP></SUB> t, (Eq. 2)
results in a burst rate constant (kobs) of 12.3 s-1 and an apparent linear rate (vss) of 120 nM/s (dashed line). With this analysis, the burst amplitude (A) represents the "apparent" active concentration of enzyme (A = 40 nM) so that kss (vss/polactive) would be 3.0 s-1. Yet, since kobs is similar to kss for pol beta , this analysis is not satisfactory and inappropriate. According to Scheme I, pol beta  will cycle quickly (kpol is similar to koff(DNA+1)), so that the burst amplitude is an underestimate of the active enzyme concentration. The amplitude is given by Equation 3 (30).
[<UP>pol-DNA</UP>][k<SUB><UP>pol</UP></SUB>/(k<SUB><UP>pol</UP></SUB>+k<SUB><UP>off</UP>(<UP>DNA+1</UP>)</SUB>)]<SUP>2</SUP> (Eq. 3)
Thus, even when kpol is 1 order of magnitude greater than koff(DNA+1), the burst amplitude is still only 83% of the true active fraction of enzyme. The apparently linear portion of the time course also suffers from the high concentration of free product DNA (DNA+1) that is accumulating after the first turnover, therefore competing with extendable substrate DNA (i.e. product inhibition). Correct analysis of the time course in Fig. 2 requires a model that takes into account product competition. Assuming rapid ligand binding and an "active" enzyme concentration of 70%, the data in Fig. 2 were fitted to the model outlined in Scheme I to estimate kpol and koff(DNA+1) (solid line). The fitted values for kpol (7.7 ± 0.5 s-1) and koff(DNA+1) (2.8 ± 0.2 s-1) are similar to the values determined independently below.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Pre-steady-state incorporation of dCTP by DNA polymerase beta . DNA polymerase beta  (100 nM) was pre-incubated with 300 nM gapped DNA substrate prior to mixing with an equal volume of 50 µM dCTP and 5 mM MgCl2 to initiate the reaction. Reactions were stopped at time intervals and the products isolated and quantified as described under "Experimental Procedures." The time course of product formation appears to be biphasic with an initial rapid exponential phase followed by a linear phase. The dashed line represents the best fit to an equation (Equation 2 under "Results") with rising exponential and linear terms. The observed rate constant of the burst phase was 12.3 s-1 followed by an apparent linear rate (vss) of 120 nM/s. With this analysis, the burst amplitude represents the apparent active concentration of enzyme (40 nM) so that kss (vss/polactive) would be 3.0 s-1. However, since kpol/koff(DNA+1) is not considerably greater than 1, this analysis is not appropriate (see "Results" for details). Assuming rapid ligand binding and an "active" enzyme fraction of 70%, the data can be fitted to the model outlined in Scheme I to derive kpol and koff(DNA+1) of 7.7 and 2.8 s-1, respectively (solid line). The simulated time course also indicates that the steady-state phase is short-lived (i.e. time course is non-linear).

To eliminate interference of enzyme cycling in determining the equilibrium nucleotide dissociation constant, an excess of enzyme was preincubated with DNA (enzyme/DNA = 5). Under this condition, nearly all of the substrate DNA is bound to enzyme so that, upon addition of dCTP/Mg2+, dNTP binding and incorporation limit catalysis. Under these single-turnover conditions, the first-order time courses were dependent on the concentration of dCTP (Fig. 3). A secondary plot indicated that the apparent first-order rate constants can be fitted to Equation 1 with a Kd and kpol of 5.6 µM and 10.0 s-1, respectively (Fig. 3B and Table II). Interestingly, however, the amplitude of the fast exponential phase was only 50% (i.e. 50 nM) of that expected. Extended incubation of the pol with substrates demonstrated that greater than 90% of the primer could be extended (data not shown). This result suggested that pol beta  can bind to the template-primer in a catalytically nonproductive mode. This nonproductive binding form competes with the excess free enzyme for productive DNA binding resulting in a biphasic time course. To determine whether enzyme that bound DNA nonproductively can isomerize to form productive enzyme-bound DNA or must dissociate from DNA to allow enzyme the opportunity to bind productively, we added excess unlabeled DNA (5 µM) with 50 µM dCTP to pol beta  (300 nM) preincubated with 100 nM 5'-labeled DNA. The unlabeled DNA binds free enzyme and enzyme that dissociates from the radioactively labeled DNA to eliminate enzyme cycling. The excess non-radioactively labeled DNA trap had no effect on the amplitude or rate of the rapid or slow phases (data not shown), indicating that for the wild-type enzyme that the nonproductive DNA binding form can isomerize to the productive form without dissociating from the DNA.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   dCTP concentration dependence of single-turnover incorporation of dCTP by DNA polymerase beta . A, gapped DNA (100 nM) was preincubated with 500 nM pol beta  and then mixed with increasing concentrations of dCTP with 5 mM MgCl2 to initiate the reaction. Reactions were quenched at the indicated times and the products isolated and quantified as described under "Experimental Procedures." The dCTP concentrations were 1 (), 5 (black-square), 10 (black-diamond ), 30 (black-triangle), 50 (black-down-triangle ), and 100 µM (open circle ). The solid lines represents the best fit of the data to a first-order process. B, a secondary plot of the dCTP concentration dependence of the observed first-order rate constants measured in A. The data were fitted to a hyperbola (Equation 1) to yield Kd of 5.6 µM and kpol of 10.0 s-1 (Table II).


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Equilibrium nucleotide binding affinities for wild-type and D276V pol beta  
The equilibrium binding affinity (Kd) of pol beta -DNA complexes with dCTP was measured by single-turnover analysis as described under "Results."

To ascertain whether dNTP incorporation during these single-turnover conditions is limited by chemistry, the rate constant for the incorporation of the alpha -thio-substituted analogue of dCTP was determined. Due to the lower electronegativity of sulfur relative to oxygen, a significant decrease in rate upon sulfur substitution would suggest that chemistry is rate-limiting. Model studies with phosphate triesters indicate a large elemental effect upon substitution of sulfur at a nonesterified position, whereas studies with phosphate diesters indicate smaller decreases in rate upon sulfur substitution (see Ref. 31 for discussion). From the dCTPalpha S concentration dependence of the rate of incorporation, the affinity (Kd) and rate constant for incorporation of the analogue were 9.8 µM and 4.7 s-1, respectively (data not shown). Thus, the thioelemental effect observed for pol beta  is only 2.1, suggesting that a step other than chemistry is rate-limiting.

Steady-state kinetic characterization of mouse pol beta  failed to demonstrate a reversal of the polymerization reaction (i.e. pyrophosphorolysis) in the presence of PPi with activated DNA. Nonetheless, PPi was inhibitory for DNA synthesis (13). To ascertain the possible significance of pyrophosphorolysis on single-nucleotide gap filling DNA synthesis, nicked DNA was used as a substrate to measure the magnitude of the reverse reaction. The substrate was identical to that used in the one-nucleotide gap filling reaction except that the primer was one nucleotide longer (i.e. +dCMP). Pyrophosphorolysis was initiated by the addition of excess PPi (3 mM) and MgCl2 to pol beta  preincubated with DNA. The steady-state removal of dCMP to create a one-nucleotide gap occurred with an apparent rate constant of 0.01 s-1 (data not shown).

Affinity of DNA Polymerase beta  for Gapped DNA-- The biphasic time course observed when DNA/pol > 1 (Fig. 2) indicates formation of a "stable" pol-DNA complex. When kpol koff(DNA+1), the amplitude of the rapid (burst) phase is equal to the active-enzyme concentration, but in the case of pol beta  is only proportional to the concentration of pol-DNA complex, as discussed above (see Equation 3). To determine the equilibrium binding affinity of pol beta  for the gapped DNA substrate, a fixed concentration of pol beta  (polt = 100 nM) was preincubated with increasing concentrations of substrate DNA (DNAt = 25-200 nM). The concentration of pol-DNA complex was estimated by rapidly mixing an excess of dCTP (50 µM) and measuring the time course of single-nucleotide incorporation. The time courses were biphasic and the amplitude of the burst phase increased as a function of increasing DNA concentration. The DNA concentration dependence of the burst amplitude is illustrated in Fig. 4 and fitted to the quadratic equation (Equation 4).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Titration of DNA polymerase beta  with gapped DNA. DNA polymerase beta  (100 nM) was preincubated with increasing concentrations of one-nucleotide gapped DNA and mixed with 50 µM dCTP and 5 mM MgCl2. Reactions were quenched at varying times up to 1 s and the products isolated and quantified as outlined under "Experimental Procedures." Time courses were fitted to Equation 2 to estimate the apparent amplitude. As discussed under "Results," the amplitude is proportional to the concentration of pol-DNA complex. The amplitudes are plotted against the concentration of one-nucleotide gapped DNA. The solid line is a fit of the data to the quadratic equation (Equation 4 under "Results"), which gave a Kd of 22 ± 13 nM and an apparent active-fraction of enzyme of 70 ± 10 nM.


[<UP>pol-DNA</UP>]=0.5(K<SUB>d</SUB>+<UP>pol<SUB>t</SUB>+DNA<SUB>t</SUB></UP>)<UP>−</UP>[<UP>0.25</UP>(K<SUB><UP>d</UP></SUB><UP>+pol<SUB>t</SUB>+DNA<SUB>t</SUB></UP>)<SUP><UP>2</UP></SUP> (Eq. 4)

<UP>−</UP>(<UP>pol<SUB>t</SUB>DNA<SUB>t</SUB></UP>)]<SUP><UP>0.5</UP></SUP>
The Kd and maximum burst amplitude were 22 and 70 nM, respectively. From Equation 3 and kpol (Fig. 3B and Table II), the maximum burst amplitude can be used to calculate koff(DNA+1). This results in a dissociation rate constant of 1.9 s-1 and in turn can be used to estimate an association rate constant of 8.6 × 107 M-1 s-1 (Kd = koff/kon).

Influence of DNA Gap on Nucleotide Affinity-- As shown in Table I, pol beta  fills single-nucleotide gapped DNA substrates nearly 15 times more efficiently than non-gapped substrates under steady-state conditions. To determine if the binding affinity of the incoming nucleotide (i.e. Kd(dCTP)) is influenced by the single-nucleotide gap, single-turnover analysis (pol/DNA = 5) was employed to quantify nucleotide binding to a non-gapped DNA substrate (the downstream primer was omitted). Using this non-gapped DNA substrate, pol beta  was found to bind and incorporate dCTP with Kd of 22 µM and kpol of 5 s-1 (Table II). This represents a 4-fold decrease in binding affinity as compared with a gapped DNA complex and an 8-fold decrease in insertion efficiency.

Role of Residue 276 in the Nucleotide Binding Pocket-- The structure of the pol beta -DNA-ddCTP complex reveals that there are van der Waals interactions between the base moiety of the incoming nucleotide and the Cbeta of Asp276, Fig. 5 (7, 8). Steady-state kinetic analysis and cross-linking studies previously suggested that removal of the electronegative side chain by valine or glycine substitution resulted in an apparent increase in binding affinity (32). To determine whether the binding affinity for the incoming nucleotide is altered by removing the negative charge, but retaining van der Waals interactions, the Kd(dCTP) was determined for the D276V mutant. Single-turnover analysis employing both non-gapped and gapped DNA substrates indicated that the Kd for the incoming nucleoside triphosphate decreased 3.6- and 9-fold, respectively, as compared with wild-type enzyme (Table II). Thus, the binding affinity for the incoming nucleotide is increased nearly 40-fold for the mutant enzyme when utilizing a gapped DNA substrate as compared with wild-type enzyme on a non-gapped DNA substrate.



View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Asp276 of DNA polymerase beta  interacts with the incoming dNTP. In the ternary pol beta /one-nucleotide gapped DNA/ddCTP complex (8), the Cbeta of Asp276 (D276, Corey-Pauling-Koltun representation) makes van der Waals contact with the base of the incoming nucleotide (ball and sticks). Asp276 also forms a hydrogen bond with Arg40 (R40) of the amino-terminal 8-kDa lyase domain. Arg40 and Asp276 are displaced from one another in the absence of the incoming nucleotide or with non-gapped DNA. The van der Waals surface of the incoming nucleotide is also illustrated. This figure was made with Molscript (61) and rendered with Raster3D (62).

Incorrect Nucleotide Binding-- To investigate whether Asp276 participates in the binding of an "incorrect" nucleotide (e.g. dTTP), the binding affinity of thymidine triphosphate with a gapped DNA substrate was determined for wild-type pol beta  and the D276V mutant. For the kinetic mechanism described above (Scheme I), when kpol becomes very slow (i.e. rate-limiting), then Km(dNTP) is equivalent to Kd(dNTP) (33-35). DNA polymerases generally discriminate against incorrect nucleotides by binding them weakly and incorporating them slowly. Thus, incorporation of an incorrect nucleotide is always rate-limiting for polymerases that exhibit low processivity, where processivity is defined as a competition between nucleotide incorporation and polymerase dissociation from the template-primer (i.e. kpol/koff(DNA)). This analysis does not require that the active fraction of enzyme be known. When the dTTP concentration dependence of incorporation opposite the template deoxyguanine in the single-nucleotide gapped DNA substrate was examined, the Km(dTTP) was 330 ± 60 and 130 ± 20 µM (five independent determinations) for the wild-type and the D276V enzymes, respectively. Therefore, valine substitution at Asp276 modestly increased (2.5 ± 0.6-fold) the binding affinity of dTTP opposite a templating deoxyguanine.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Nucleic acid polymerases must select (bind and incorporate) the correct nucleotide from a pool of structurally similar molecules to ensure accurate and efficient nucleic acid synthesis. DNA polymerase binding of the incoming nucleoside triphosphate has been mechanistically and kinetically described as occurring in at least two steps. After initial complex formation, an isomerization of the polymerase ternary complex leads to a productive catalytic complex where chemistry occurs rapidly (Scheme II). Each of the steps illustrated in Scheme II (ground-state binding, isomerization, chemistry) offers an opportunity for selection of the correct nucleotide.
<UP>Pol<SUB>DNA</SUB></UP>+<UP>dNTP</UP> <LIM><OP><ARROW>⇄</ARROW></OP><LL><AR><R><C><UP>ground-state</UP></C></R><R><C><UP>binding</UP></C></R></AR></LL><UL>K<SUB>d</SUB></UL></LIM><UP> Pol</UP><SUP><UP>dNTP</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>DNA</UP></SUB> <LIM><OP><ARROW>⇄</ARROW></OP><LL><UP>isomerization</UP></LL><UL>k<SUB><UP>pol</UP></SUB></UL></LIM> 

<UP>*Pol</UP><SUP><UP>dNTP</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>DNA</UP></SUB> <LIM><OP><ARROW>→</ARROW></OP><LL><UP>chemistry</UP></LL><UL><UP>fast</UP></UL></LIM><UP> PP<SUB>i</SUB></UP>+<UP>Pol<SUB>DNA+1</SUB></UP>

<UP><SC>Scheme</SC> II</UP>
The contribution of each of these steps to the accuracy of nucleotide selection for DNA synthesis depends on the specific DNA polymerase. Whereas polymerases generally bind the incorrect nucleotide weakly and incorporate (kpol) them slowly (e.g. T7 DNA polymerase and HIV-1 reverse transcriptase), the Klenow fragment of E. coli pol I does not appear to utilize ground-state binding to increase selectivity (Kd(correct) approx  Kd(incorrect)) (36). The lack of a significant elemental effect when the non-bridging oxygen on the alpha -phosphorus is substituted with sulfur is consistent with a rate-limiting conformational change in a two-step dNTP binding mechanism for human DNA polymerase beta . This interpretation is supported by fluorescence changes of the template base analogue 2-aminopurine that occur upon nucleotide binding (37). The environment of the templating base, as monitored by fluorescence, changes at a rate that is similar to nucleotide incorporation even when incorporation is prevented (i.e. no chemistry) by using a dideoxynucleotide-terminated primer. A similar approach had been used to separate chemical and non-chemical steps of nucleotide binding with Klenow fragment and T4 DNA polymerase (15).

DNA polymerase beta  utilizes ground-state binding to selectively incorporate dCTP opposite a templating deoxyguanine. The selectivity over thymidine triphosphate (Kd(dTTP)/ Kd(dCTP)) is approximately 60. This is similar to the selectivity of 25 (38) and 120 (39) reported for HIV-1 reverse transcriptase, but less than the selectivity of 410 for T7 DNA polymerase (40), when considering formation of the same mispair. The selectivity of the D276V mutant was moderately increased to 220 by binding the correct deoxynucleoside triphosphate more tightly than the incorrect thymidine triphosphate relative to wild-type enzyme.

Steady-state and pre-steady-state kinetics indicate that DNA polymerases bind substrates in an ordered fashion; DNA binding precedes nucleotide binding. However, this is clearly not obligatory. For example, utilizing photoreactive nucleotide analogues, it is possible to covalently cross-link these analogues to pol beta  and other DNA polymerases in the absence of DNA. Upon the addition of DNA, only analogues cross-linked at the polymerase active site are incorporated, resulting in DNA that becomes cross-linked to the polymerase (32). Additionally, crystal structures of binary pol-dNTP complexes reveal that the dNTP is bound in the active site through its triphosphate moiety (41-43). The triphosphate moiety, therefore, offers minimal specificity toward accuracy for correct nucleotide binding. The sugar also affords some specificity, since 2'-deoxyribose is preferred over ribose in the presence of DNA. However, discrimination during dNTP binding originates mainly from the identity of the base and its hydrogen bonding capacity and steric complementarity with the templating base. Ground-state binding of a nucleotide offers the opportunity to check proper Watson-Crick hydrogen bonding and/or steric complementarity. Formation of a base pair with good geometry induces a conformational change that results in rapid incorporation of the nucleotide. Thus, the rate of insertion is limited by a conformational change that triggers chemistry. The identity in structural terms of this rate-limiting conformational change will be discussed here.

Several significant structural changes occur upon substrate (DNA and dNTP) binding to pol beta  and other DNA polymerases as inferred from comparison of structures of apoenzyme with substrate bound complexes. These conformational changes occur with both the polymerase and the substrate. The rate-limiting conformational change observed kinetically has been postulated to be the large subdomain movement that is observed by comparing the crystal structures of open pol and pol-DNA complexes with those of the closed ternary pol-DNA-dNTP complexes (see Ref. 44 for a review). For pol beta , in addition to significant movement of the 8-kDa lyase domain upon binding gapped DNA, the carboxyl-terminal subdomain is observed to "close" upon the exposed face of the nascent base pair. Rotation around an axis, alpha -helix M, positions alpha -helix N to probe correct Watson-Crick geometry (7, 8, 24). Superimposing the polymerase catalytic subdomains of the binary one-nucleotide gapped DNA substrate with that including the incoming ddCTP (ternary complex) illustrates this subdomain movement (Fig. 6A) and reveals that the 8-kDa domain moves slightly to form an even more compact structure (not shown) (24). Numerous active site side chain and substrate motions are associated with these conformational differences. Assuming that valine substitution for Asp276 does not produce additional active site structural changes, the finding that interactions between Asp276 and the incoming dNTP influence ground-state dNTP binding implies that the conformational change limiting insertion during the first turnover may not involve movement of alpha -helix N. This follows because Cbeta of Asp276 must be in close contact with the base of the incoming dNTP during template base annealing. The van der Waals interaction between Cbeta of Asp276 and the correct dNTP is observed in the closed conformation indicating that the closed conformation itself may trigger the rate-limiting conformational change. A "structural signal" to indicate that positioning of alpha -helix N in the closed position has occurred could be transmitted to the catalytic metal-binding site through the altered positioning observed with Arg283, Glu295, Arg258, and Asp192 in the open and closed forms of pol beta  (Fig. 6B). From a comparison of open and closed forms of pol beta  ternary complexes, it has also been suggested that thumb closure repositions the mononucleotide binding motif (residues 179-189) closer to the primer 3'-hydroxyl (8).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Comparison of open and closed DNA polymerase beta -substrate complexes. A, the catalytic subdomains of the binary pol-DNA complex (1bpx, blue-green) and ternary complex (+ddCTP; 1bpy, purple) were superimposed and indicate that rotation around helix M (about 30°) positions helix N next to the new base pair. The DNA backbone, templating base, and incoming ddCTP (closed ternary complex) are illustrated. Asp276 (D276) is illustrated in a ball-and-stick representation and stacks with the base of the incoming ddCTP in the closed complex. B, the position of alpha -helix N can be structurally transmitted to the catalytic metals through the altered interactions between Arg283 (R283), in helix N, and Asp192 (D192) that coordinates both active site Mg2+ ions (A and B). This may occur through altered interaction observed between Glu295 (E295) and Arg258 (R258) in the open (inactive) and closed (active) forms of pol beta . Phe272 (F272) is postulated to transiently interfere with interactions between Asp192 and Arg258 permitting an interaction with Glu295. Any of these subtle structural movements inferred from comparison of the open and closed complexes could kinetically limit chemistry and represent the rate-limiting conformational change. This figure was made with Molscript (61) and rendered with Raster3D (62).

DNA polymerase beta  is an integral component of the BER pathway. It is responsible for removing the 5'-dRP flap and filling the one-nucleotide gap generated during BER (for a review, see Refs. 45 and 46). DNA polymerase beta  processively fills short DNA gaps (= 5 nucleotides) where the downstream DNA is 5'-phosphorylated (23, 47). In contrast, DNA synthesis occurs in a distributive fashion with non-gapped DNA. This is attributed to the 5'-phosphate binding activity of the amino-terminal 8-kDa domain (23). The 8-kDa domain interacts with the carboxyl-terminal domain when bound to a one-nucleotide DNA gap (Fig. 1A). This interaction buries approximately 130 Å2 of surface area. In the closed ternary complex of the one-nucleotide gap DNA structure, this solvent-inaccessible interface increases to 300 Å2.

We have examined the influence of the template-primer structure on nucleotide binding by pol beta . Previous studies that examined the influence of template-primer structure on the catalytic efficiency of pol beta  have reported dissimilar effects. In one study, the catalytic efficiency was increased over 2500-fold when using a single-nucleotide gap, as compared with a non-gapped DNA substrate (48). In contrast, only a modest influence (10-fold) of gap structure on catalytic efficiency has also been reported (49). In the current study, the catalytic efficiency increased about 10-fold as determined from steady-state (Table I) or pre-steady-state kinetics (Table II) with a one-nucleotide DNA gap, as compared with non-gapped DNA. With a template-primer system that is typically employed for kinetic study of DNA polymerases (non-gapped DNA), pol beta  binds the correct nucleotide with a lower affinity than when bound to gapped DNA (Table II). This could be due to the role that the amino-terminal 8-kDa domain may play in forming the dNTP binding pocket. In the absence of downstream DNA (i.e. no gap), the dNTP binding site is "exposed" relative to that observed in the ternary complex with a one-nucleotide gapped DNA (Fig. 1). As illustrated in Fig. 1, this results in a doughnut-like structure that apparently gates dNTP binding through a cavity leading to the polymerase active site. This type of polymerase architecture is similar to that observed with B-type replicative polymerases (50, 51), as well as with the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase from hepatitis C (52, 53).

The modestly higher dNTP binding affinity when pol beta  utilizes a one-nucleotide gapped DNA substrate indicates a role for the 8-kDa domain in dNTP binding with the one-nucleotide gapped DNA substrate. Additionally, both wild-type enzyme and the D276V mutant exhibit a 2-fold increase in the rate of nucleotide insertion (kpol) with a one-nucleotide gapped DNA substrate (Table II). A strong hydrogen bond between Asp276 of alpha -helix N and Arg40 (alpha  -helix B) of the 8-kDa lyase domain in the closed ternary complex is the only electrostatic interaction between the 8-kDa domain and alpha -helix N. The increased binding affinity with gapped DNA suggests that the negative charge contributed by Asp276 restricts binding (reduced association and/or increased dissociation) and that Arg40 may increase binding affinity in the gapped structure by charge compensation. Except for that contributed by Asp276, the electrostatic surface potential around the sugar and base of the incoming nucleotide is positive (Fig. 7). It is noteworthy that most other X family polymerases have an arginine or lysine at this position (54). Additionally, Arg72 of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase is observed to stack with the incoming dNTP and form hydrogen bonds with the alpha -phosphate. It is highly conserved among retroviral reverse transcriptases and telomerase. In contrast to the results reported here for Asp276, modification of the Arg72 side chain results in mutant enzymes that have dramatically lower catalytic efficiency (55, 56). In the case of pol beta , it appears that the surrounding positive potential (i.e. blue) can facilitate dNTP binding with a one-nucleotide gapped DNA substrate. This interpretation is consistent with the observation that removal of the acidic side chain by valine substitution (D276V) results in ground-state binding affinity on non-gapped DNA similar to that of wild-type enzyme on gapped DNA (Table II). In this situation, the positive potential is removed by side chain replacement, whereas in the latter situation, the highly basic 8-kDa domain facilitates binding through charge neutralization.



View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Electrostatic surface potential of the dNTP binding pocket of pol beta . The view is similar to that of Fig. 1. Blue and red represent positive and negative potentials, respectively. The template and gapped (primer and downstream DNA) strands are red and yellow, respectively. The incoming ddCTP (yellow) is situated in a cavity at the 3'-primer terminus. Asp276 (D276) contributes negative potential in the vicinity of the incoming ddCTP. It is surrounded by several basic residues (e.g. Lys27 (K27), Arg40 (R40), and Lys280 (K280)). This figure was made with GRASP (60) and Molscript (61) and rendered with Raster3D (62).

When a one-nucleotide gapped DNA substrate is utilized by the D276V mutant polymerase, the binding affinity for the incoming nucleotide is increased even further (Table II). This result indicates that additional interactions and conformational changes give rise to an increased free energy of binding. The additional methylene-group in the valine side chain, as compared with aspartate, may increase the van der Waals contacts with the base of the incoming nucleotide.

The low processivity of pol beta  makes it difficult to accurately analyze the biphasic time courses of product formation when DNA is in excess by pre-steady-state methods (enzyme/DNA < 1; Fig. 2). This is because kpol and koff are both partially rate-limiting, and product inhibition makes it difficult to estimate the linear steady-state rate of product formation. Processivity is kinetically defined as the probability of inserting a nucleotide (i.e. kpol) to that of dissociating from the DNA substrate (i.e. koff). Thus, with a one-nucleotide gapped DNA substrate the processivity of DNA polymerase beta  is modest (kpol/koff = 10 s-1/1.9 s-1 = 5.3). This is consistent with the qualitative gel assay that had indicated pol beta  can processively fill short gaps of up to 6 nucleotides (47). Single-turnover analysis (enzyme/DNA 1) of dNTP binding to DNA polymerase beta  eliminates enzyme cycling. From the nucleotide-dependent exponential time courses, the ground-state binding affinity for dCTP and kpol for the wild-type and D276V polymerases were determined (Fig. 3; Table II). The amplitude of the exponential time courses should be equivalent to the concentration of DNA. Under the conditions of the assay, 95% of the DNA should be enzyme-bound. For several determinations, the amplitude of the rapid-exponential phase was 63 ± 8% and 37 ± 6% of the extendable DNA for the wild-type and D276V polymerases, respectively. This indicates that a population of these polymerases can bind in a nonproductive conformation that is sensitive to the valine substitution at Asp276. To determine whether this nonproductive DNA binding form could isomerize to a productive complex without dissociating from DNA, unlabeled DNA was added to trap enzyme that may dissociate during the course of the reaction. The excess non-radioactively labeled DNA trap had no effect on the amplitudes or rates of the rapid or slow phases, indicating that for the wild-type enzyme that the nonproductive DNA binding form can isomerize to the productive form without dissociating from the DNA. Similar results were observed with the mutant enzyme except that the slow phase was partially sensitive to the added trap. A thorough kinetic and thermodynamic analysis of these alternate binding modes is currently under study.

The alternate binding modes result in a decreased population of polymerase poised for nucleotide insertion. Suo and Johnson (57, 58) observed similar kinetic behavior when HIV-1 reverse transcriptase binds templates with secondary structure and suggested that the template nucleic acid is blocking access to the pol dNTP binding pocket. A similar proposal for pol beta  suggests that the DNA substrate may bind at the polymerase active site such that the terminal template-primer base pair is sitting where the nascent base pair would form. In this conformation the template-primer is out of register for DNA synthesis and would block an incoming nucleotide from entering the polymerase active site. This conformation is observed in the binary complex of pol beta  bound to nicked DNA. In addition, the ability of DNA polymerases to catalyze pyrophosphorolysis requires that the terminal primer nucleotide move into the polymerase active site to achieve PPi addition. As the valine substitution at Asp276 stabilizes the incoming nucleotide sitting in the active site, it also may stabilize the terminal primer nucleotide in the polymerase active site. This is consistent with the lower apparent active concentration of the mutant polymerase.

In conclusion, the dNTP binding affinity is increased for pol beta  with a one-nucleotide gapped DNA substrate, suggesting a role for the amino-terminal lyase domain in nucleotide binding. Interestingly, altering the interactions with the incoming nucleotide and/or lyase domain by site-directed mutagenesis of Asp276 also increased the binding affinity of the correct incoming nucleotide. This is the first example that we are aware of where strategic modification of the dNTP binding pocket has resulted in an increased nucleotide binding affinity. It will be interesting to determine if the observed changes in binding affinity are due to "ionic tethering" (59) where Asp276 and Arg40 modulate domain interactions to influence ligand binding. Finally, since this interaction between Asp276 and the incoming dNTP is observed only in the closed conformation of pol beta , the increase in the free energy in ground-state binding for the D276V mutant suggests that the rate-limiting conformational change is not the open to closed structural transition, but instead is triggered in the closed polymerase conformation. Deoxynucleoside triphosphate binding, therefore, occurs in at least three steps. First, there is an initial nonspecific binding that occurs primarily through polymerase interactions with the triphosphate/metal and sugar moieties of the nucleotide. This step is weak so as to facilitate rapid sampling of the nucleoside triphosphate pools and is kinetically silent. This sampling is probably associated with the subdomain movements inferred from the crystal structure differences between the binary pol-DNA and ternary substrate complexes. The second step, ground-state binding, is associated with template base recognition through hydrogen bonding and/or steric complementarity. In turn, the degree of complementarity influences the probability of triggering a rate-limiting conformational change (i.e. step three) that leads to a catalytically competent complex that induces chemistry.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. Robert E. London and Thomas A. Darden for critical reading of the manuscript.


    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 919-541-3267; Fax: 919-541-2260; E-mail: wilson5@niehs.nih.gov.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 9, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M002884200


    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: BER, base excision repair; dRP, 5'-deoxyribose phosphate; AP, apurinic/apyrimidinic; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; pol, polymerase.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES


1. Sobol, R. W., Horton, J. K., Kühn, R., Gu, H., Singhal, R. K., Prasad, R., Rajewsky, K., and Wilson, S. H. (1996) Nature 379, 183-186[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Dianov, G. L., Prasad, R., Wilson, S. H., and Bohr, V. A. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 13741-13743[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Biade, S., Sobol, R. W., Wilson, S. H., and Matsumoto, Y. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 898-902[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Fortini, P., Pascucci, B., Parlanti, E., Sobol, R. W., Wilson, S. H., and Dogliotti, E. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 3575-3580[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Holm, L., and Sander, C. (1995) Trends Biochem. Sci. 20, 345-347[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Kohlstaedt, L. A., Wang, J., Friedman, J. M., Rice, P. A., and Steitz, T. A. (1992) Science 256, 1783-1790[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Pelletier, H., Sawaya, M. R., Kumar, A., Wilson, S. H., and Kraut, J. (1994) Science 264, 1891-1903[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Sawaya, M. R., Prasad, R., Wilson, S. H., Kraut, J., and Pelletier, H. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 11205-11215[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Doublié, S., Tabor, S., Long, A. M., Richardson, C. C., and Ellenberger, T. (1998) Nature 391, 251-258[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Li, Y., Korolev, S., and Waksman, G. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 7514-7525[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Huang, H., Chopra, R., Verdine, G. L., and Harrison, S. C. (1998) Science 282, 1669-1675[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Steitz, T. A., Smerdon, S. J., Jager, J., and Joyce, C. M. (1994) Science 266, 2022-2025[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Tanabe, K., Bohn, E. W., and Wilson, S. H. (1979) Biochemistry 18, 3401-3406[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Kuchta, R. D., Mizrahi, V., Benkovic, P. A., Johnson, K. A., and Benkovic, S. J. (1987) Biochemistry 26, 8410-8417[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Frey, M. W., Sowers, L. C., Millar, D. P., and Benkovic, S. J. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 9185-9192[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Capson, T. L., Peliska, J. A., Kaboord, B. F., Frey, M. W., Lively, C., Dahlberg, M., and Benkovic, S. J. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 10984-10994[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Patel, S. S., Wong, I., and Johnson, K. A. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 511-525[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Kati, W. M., Johnson, K. A., Jerva, L. F., and Anderson, K. S. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 25988-25997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Ahn, J., Werneburg, B. G., and Tsai, M.-D. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 1100-1107[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Kumar, A., Widen, S. G., Williams, K. R., Kedar, P., Karpel, R. L., and Wilson, S. H. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 2124-2131[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Prasad, R., Beard, W. A., and Wilson, S. H. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 18096-18101[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Matsumoto, Y., and Kim, K. (1995) Science 269, 699-702[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Prasad, R., Beard, W. A., Strauss, P. R., and Wilson, S. H. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 15263-15270[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Beard, W. A., and Wilson, S. H. (1998) Chem. Biol. 5, R7-R13[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Beard, W. A., and Wilson, S. H. (1995) Methods Enzymol. 262, 98-107[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Casas-Finet, J. R., Kumar, A., Morris, G., and Wilson, S. H. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 19618-19625[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Beard, W. A., Osheroff, W. P., Prasad, R., Sawaya, M. R., Jaju, M., Wood, T. G., Kraut, J., Kunkel, T. A., and Wilson, S. H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 12141-12144[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Barshop, B. A., Wrenn, R. F., and Frieden, C. (1983) Anal. Biochem. 130, 134-145[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Zimmerle, C. T., and Frieden, C. (1989) Biochemistry 258, 381-387
30. Wharton, C. W., and Eisenthal, R. (1981) Molecular Enzymology , pp. 204-219, Blackie, London
31. Polesky, A. H., Dahlberg, M. E., Benkovic, S. J., Grindley, N. D., and Joyce, C. M. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 8417-8428[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Lavrik, O. I., Prasad, R., Beard, W. A., Safronov, I. V., Dobrikov, M. I., Srivastava, D. K., Shishkin, G. V., Wood, T. G., and Wilson, S. H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 21891-21897[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Beard, W. A., Stahl, S. J., Kim, H.-R., Bebenek, K., Kumar, A., Strub, M.-P., Becerra, S. P., Kunkel, T. A., and Wilson, S. H. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 28091-28097[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Beard, W. A., and Wilson, S. H. (1995) in A Practical Approach: HIV (Karn, J., ed), Vol. 2 , pp. 15-36, IRL Press, New York
35. Jaju, M., Beard, W. A., and Wilson, S. H. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 9740-9747[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Eger, B. T., Kuchta, R. D., Carroll, S. S., Benkovic, P. A., Dahlberg, M. E., Joyce, C., M., and Benkovic, S. J. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 1441-1448[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Zhong, X. J., Patel, S. S., Werneburg, B. G., and Tsai, M. D. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 11891-11900[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Zinnen, S., Hsieh, J. C., and Modrich, P. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 24195-24202[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Feng, J. Y., and Anderson, K. S. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 9440-9448[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Donlin, M. J., and Johnson, K. A. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 14908-14917[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Beese, L. S., Friedman, J. M., and Steitz, T. A. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 14095-14101[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Sawaya, M. R., Pelletier, H., Kumar, A., Wilson, S. H., and Kraut, J. (1994) Science 264, 1930-1935[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Li, Y., Kong, Y., Korolev, S., and Waksman, G. (1998) Protein Sci. 7, 1116-1123[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Doublié, S., Sawaya, M. R., and Ellenberger, T. (1999) Structure 7, R31-R35[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Wilson, S. H. (1998) Mutat. Res. 407, 203-215[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Beard, W. A., and Wilson, S. H. (2000) Mutat. Res. 460, 231-244[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Singhal, R. K., and Wilson, S. H. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 15906-15911[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Chagovetz, A. M., Sweasy, J. B., and Preston, B. D. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 27501-27504[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Ahn, J., Kraynov, V. S., Zhong, X., Werneburg, B. G., and Tsai, M. D. (1998) Biochem. J. 331, 79-87[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Wang, J., Sattar, A. K. M. A., Wang, C. C., Karam, J. D., Konigsberg, W. H., and Steitz, T. A. (1997) Cell 89, 1087-1099[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Bressanelli, S., Tomei, L., Roussel, A., Incitti, I., Vitale, R. L., Mathieu, M., De Francesco, R., and Rey, F. A. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 13034-13039[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52. Hopfner, K.-P., Eichinger, A., Engh, R. A., Laue, F., Ankenbauer, W., Huber, R., and Angerer, B. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 3600-3605[Abstract/Free Full Text]
53. Lesburg, C. A., Cable, M. B., Ferrari, E., Hong, Z., Mannarino, A. F., and Weber, P. C. (1999) Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 937-943[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Oliveros, M., Yáñez, R. J., Salas, M. L., Salas, J., Viñuela, E., and Blanco, L. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 30899-30910[Abstract/Free Full Text]
55. Sarafianos, S. G., Pandey, V. N., Kaushik, N., and Modak, M. J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 19729-19735[Abstract/Free Full Text]
56. Lewis, D. A., Bebenek, K., Beard, W. A., Wilson, S. H., and Kunkel, T. A. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 32924-32930[Abstract/Free Full Text]
57. Suo, Z. C., and Johnson, K. A. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 12459-12467[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
58. Suo, Z., and Johnson, K. A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 27259-27267[Abstract/Free Full Text]
59. Wade, R. C., Gabdoulline, R. R., Ludemann, S. K., and Lounnas, V. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 5942-5949[Abstract/Free Full Text]
60. Nicholls, A., Sharp, K. A., and Honig, B. (1991) Proteins 11, 281-296[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
61. Kraulis, P. (1991) J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24, 946-950[CrossRef]
62. Merritt, E. A., and Bacon, D. J. (1997) Methods Enzymol. 277, 505-524


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.