ACCELERATED PUBLICATION
Deacetylase Activity Associates with Topoisomerase II and Is Necessary for Etoposide-induced Apoptosis*

Colin A. Johnson, Kay PadgetDagger , Caroline A. AustinDagger , and Bryan M. Turner§

From the Chromatin and Gene Expression Group, Department of Anatomy, University of Birmingham Medical School, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom and the Dagger  School of Biochemistry and Genetics, The Medical School, University of Newcastle, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom

Received for publication, November 20, 2000, and in revised form, December 22, 2000



    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

DNA topoisomerase II (topo II) is a ubiquitous nuclear enzyme that is involved in DNA replication, transcription, chromosome segregation, and apoptosis. Here we show by immunoprecipitation, pull down with glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins, and yeast two-hybrid analysis that both topo IIalpha and -beta physically interact with the histone deacetylase HDAC1. The in vitro DNA decatenation activity of recombinant topo IIalpha and -beta is inhibited by association with catalytically inactive, recombinant HDAC1. We provide evidence for the in vivo significance of the topo II-HDAC1 association, showing that inhibition of HDAC activity with trichostatin A suppresses apoptosis induced by the topo II poison etoposide, but not by the topoisomerase I inhibitor camptothecin. We suggest that chromatin remodeling by an HDAC-containing complex facilitates both topo II-catalyzed DNA rearrangement and etoposide-induced DNA damage in vivo.



    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

For completion of cell division, the DNA of replicated chromosomes must be disentangled to allow the segregation of sister chromatids. In humans, this is achieved by the unique decatenation activity of DNA topoisomerase II (topo1 II). Topo II is essential for normal and neoplastic cellular proliferation, and several common anti-cancer drugs exert their cytotoxic effects through this enzyme (1, 2).

Topoisomerase II activity in mammalian cells has been attributed to at least two isoforms. Topo IIalpha (p170) associates with chromosomes during prophase and throughout mitosis and is thought to be a major component of the nuclear scaffold (3, 4). It has a peak of expression during G2/M of the cell cycle (5). In contrast, the closely related topo IIbeta (p180) isoform is thought to have a more general role in DNA metabolism, with expression levels that remain relatively constant during cell and growth cycles (5). Both isoforms interact with the C-terminal region of the tumor suppressor protein, p53 (6). p53 is a component of a multiprotein complex that contains the histone deacetylase HDAC1 and the corepressor Sin3a (7-11).

HDAC1, and the closely related HDAC2, are both components of two separate multiprotein complexes. The NuRD/Mi-2 repression complex contains both nucleosome remodeling and histone deacetylase activities (12), whereas the Sin3 complex contains only the latter (9). Both complexes contain the Rb-associated proteins RbAp46 and RbAp48 and associate with various, sometimes DNA-binding, transcriptional repressor and corepressor proteins (11). The Xenopus NuRD complex (which contains homologues of mammalian HDAC1, RbAp48, and the methyl-CpG-binding protein MBD3) copurifies with DNA topoisomerase II (13), raising the possibility that mammalian topo II isoforms and HDAC1 may interact in a multiprotein complex.

Here we show that HDAC1 and DNA topoisomerase II isoforms physically interact both in vivo and in vitro. We also show that the HDAC inhibitor, TSA, suppresses apoptosis induced by the topo II poison etoposide, but not by the topo I inhibitor camptothecin. Our results raise the interesting possibility that chromatin remodeling by a topo II-HDAC-containing complex is involved in topo II-catalyzed DNA rearrangements and/or generation of etoposide-induced DNA strand breaks in vivo.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cells, Reagents, and Materials-- The human cell lines HL-60 (promyelocytic leukemia; p53 null) and HeLa were grown in RPMI 1640 medium containing 8% fetal calf serum. Regions of HDAC1 cDNA were subcloned into the pGEX3T-4 family of vectors (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and verified by sequencing. GST fusion proteins were purified essentially as described previously (6). Recombinant human DNA topoisomerase IIalpha and -beta were made in a yeast system and purified as described previously (14). Characterization and use of rabbit polyclonal antibodies against topo IIalpha (18511alpha ) and topo IIbeta (18513beta ) are described elsewhere (15). A polyclonal rabbit antibody against mammalian HDAC1 was raised against a synthetic peptide corresponding to amino acid residues 467-482 and affinity-purified as described previously (16). Antibody against topo I was obtained commercially (TopoGen, number 2012).

Immunoprecipitations, in Vitro Binding Assays, and Western Blot Analysis-- HeLa whole cell extract was prepared by lysing cells in incubation buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 10% (v/v) glycerol) containing 1.0% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, 0.5% (w/v) sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% (w/v) SDS, protease inhibitors (0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and "Complete MiniTM" tablets, Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and 50 units of DNase I (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) per 108 cells. The lysate was incubated in ice for 10 min, and the clarified supernatant was used in standard immunoprecipitations as described previously (6, 17). To confirm specificity, cognate blocking peptide (10 µg) was incubated with the antibody for 30 min before the addition of extract. Preimmune serum and irrelevant antisera were used as controls. GST pull down experiments used equivalent amounts of GST fusion proteins prebound to glutathione-Sepharose beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) as described previously (6). Interactions with recombinant topo IIalpha were performed in incubation buffer containing 0.1% (v/v) Nonidet P-40.

Yeast Two-hybrid Assays-- Yeast strains CG-1945 from a Matchmaker Two-Hybrid System II kit (CLONTECH) were transformed with appropriate binary combinations of constructs containing the GAL4 DNA-binding domain and the GAL4 activation domain, as recommended by the manufacturers. HIS3 reporter gene expression was assayed on plates (6), in the presence of 25 mM 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole to suppress background growth (18).

Enzyme Assays-- Histone deacetylase activity was assayed as described previously (17). DNA strand-passage assays were performed on kinetoplast DNA (kDNA) as described previously (6).

Detection of Apoptosis-- HL-60 cells were grown until in mid-log phase, then treated with 100 nM (30 ng/ml) TSA for 0.5 h before additional treatments with either 100 µM (59 µg/ml) etoposide or 5.8 µM (2 µg/ml) camptothecin for 1.5 h. Control samples were treated with the dilution vehicles (0.1% Me2SO and 0.1% ethanol). All cells were observed in situ with phase-contrast microscopy to count cells with an apoptotic morphology, after staining with 10 µM Hoechst 33342 with the addition of 0.1 µM propidium iodide to visualize necrotic cells. Cells were also labeled with either FITC-annexin V conjugate (PharMingen) or with the FAM-VAD-FMK reagent provided in the CaspaTagTM fluorescein caspase activity kit (Intergen). Labeled cells were detected by indirect fluorescence microscopy (all cells) or by FACS analysis on a Coulter Epics flow cytometer.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Interaction of HDAC1 and DNA Topoisomerase II-- HeLa whole cell extract was immunoprecipitated with affinity-purified antibody against mammalian HDAC1 and precipitated material tested for the presence of topo IIalpha by Western blotting (Fig. 1A). Anti-HDAC1 brought down easily detectable amounts of topo IIalpha . There was no detectable immunoprecipitation of topo IIalpha with preimmune serum, and immunoprecipitation was completely abolished by inclusion in the incubation mix of the peptide used to raise the anti-HDAC1 antibody (Fig. 1A). The anti-HDAC1 antibody did not immunoprecipitate detectable levels of topo IIbeta (data not shown), and antibody to topo IIbeta brought down only a comparatively small amount of the alpha  isoform (Fig. 1A). However, antisera against both topo IIalpha and topo IIbeta immunoprecipitate 6-9% of total deacetylase activity from HeLa whole cell extract (Fig. 1B). The activity is fully inhibited by TSA. Negative control immunoprecipitations with preimmune serum, an irrelevant antibody (anti-CDK7), or an antibody against DNA topoisomerase I (topo I) did not bring down activity above that of the no-antibody control.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Evidence for the physical association of topo IIalpha and HDAC1 proteins. A, Immunoprecipitation of endogenous topo IIalpha (molecular mass, 170 kDa), with the indicated antibodies (10 µg of total IgG), from 100 µg of HeLa whole cell extract (WCE). B, immunoprecipitation of deacetylase activity by antisera against topo IIalpha and topo IIbeta (18511alpha and 18513beta ) from HeLa WCE. Deacetylase activity is inhibited by TSA (10 ng/ml). Activity immunoprecipitated is expressed as a percentage of total input deacetylase activity, less a background of nonenzymatic release of [3H]acetate of 1.94%. Percentages are averages of three separate experiments, with bars representing S.D.

We performed in vitro pull down experiments of endogenous protein with GST fusion proteins. Full-length mammalian HDAC1, tagged with a GST moiety, but not GST itself, bound endogenous topo IIalpha in whole cell extract (Fig. 2A). In the converse experiment, a GST fusion protein containing the C-terminal domain (CTD) of topo IIalpha was able to pull down endogenous HDAC1 (Fig. 2B). The fusion protein of the CTD of topo IIbeta was also able to pull down small amounts of HDAC1 (Fig. 2B). Fusion proteins of the CTD of topo IIalpha and topo IIbeta were able to pull down between 9 and 11% of deacetylase activity (Fig. 2C), comparable with the amounts brought down by immunoprecipitation (Fig. 1B). Whereas GST-topo IIbeta pulls down less HDAC1, as detected on Western blots, than comparable amounts of GST-topo IIalpha (Fig. 2B), the two different fusion proteins bring down similar amounts of deacetylase activity (Fig. 2C). A possible explanation for this quantitative discrepancy is that other deacetylases, in addition to HDAC1, are preferentially associated with topo IIbeta .



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Pull down experiments of endogenous topo II and HDAC1. A, pull down of endogenous topo IIalpha by 5 µg of immobilized (bound) GST-HDAC1, but not by immobilized GST. Topo IIalpha is also depleted from the supernatant (unbound) by GST-HDAC1. B, pull down of endogenous HDAC1 (molecular mass, 62 kDa) by immobilized GST-topo IIalpha and topo IIbeta , containing the CTD of each isoform. C, pull down of deacetylase activity with immobilized GST-topo IIalpha CTD and topo IIbeta CTD. Bars represent ranges of two experiments.

GST fusion proteins containing the C-terminal domain of HDAC1 interact with recombinant topo IIalpha (Fig. 3). This domain has previously been shown to contain the LXCXE motif (residues 414-418), that appears to mediate interactions with the retinoblastoma protein pRb (19). In contrast, an N-terminal HDAC1 fusion protein, containing the catalytic site, showed minimal interaction with recombinant topo IIalpha (Fig. 3).



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   In vitro interaction of recombinant topo IIalpha and HDAC1. Regions of HDAC1 cDNA were subcloned and expressed as GST fusion proteins. Immobilized fusion proteins (5 µg) were tested for interaction with 1 µg of recombinant topo IIalpha .

A yeast two-hybrid system (18) was used to test for direct in vivo interaction between topo II and HDAC1. Inserts were constructed to express the topo IIalpha and topo IIbeta C-terminal domains (6) and the HDAC1 region 220-482 (Fig. 3). Expression of the integrated, GAL4-dependent HIS3 reporter gene was used to detect interactions between "bait" and "prey" proteins in vivo. Topo IIalpha CTD or topo IIbeta CTD as bait, together with HDAC1 as prey, allowed growth of large colonies (over 2 mm diameter) on His-selective medium. All three proteins were ineffective when expressed individually (Fig. 4).



View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Yeast two-hybrid assay showing that the CTDs of topo IIalpha and topo IIbeta can interact with HDAC1 CTD (amino acids 220-482) in vivo. Expression of the reporter gene HIS3 in yeast stain CG-1945 (CLONTECH) was determined by two parallel series of spot assays on selective medium plates lacking tryptophan, leucine, and histidine (-Trp, -Leu, -His), but in the presence of 25 mM 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole to suppress background growth (6, 18). Colony size was compared with that on plates lacking tryptophan and leucine (-Trp -Leu) as control. Strong growth in -His medium occurs only in cells in which the bait and prey proteins physically interact.

To explore the biological significance of the topo II-HDAC1 interaction, we tested the ability of full-length recombinant HDAC1 to modulate the functional properties of recombinant topo IIalpha and -beta . Both of these enzymes can decatenate kinetoplast DNA (kDNA) to minicircle monomers, a process that requires a double-stranded break in the kDNA to allow strand passage. The addition of increasing amounts of HDAC1 to the reaction decreases the decatenation of kDNA by topo IIalpha and -beta (Fig. 5). Addition of GST alone did not affect decatenation by either topo IIalpha and -beta .



View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Functional association of topo II and histone deacetylase. Decatentation of 1.4 µg of kinetoplast DNA concatemer (concat.) to monomers of minicircle DNA by recombinant topo IIalpha (0.60 pmol) and topo IIbeta (0.22 pmol) is inhibited by increasing amounts of GST-HDAC1 (1.4-13.9 pmol), but not by GST alone (4.2-13.9 pmol).

Suppression of Etoposide-mediated Apoptosis by the HDAC Inhibitor Trichostatin A-- We tested the effect of the HDAC inhibitor trichostatin A (20) on apoptosis induced by the chemotherapeutic agent etoposide (VP-16). Etoposide causes topoisomerase II-mediated DNA damage by increasing the steady-state concentration of covalent DNA cleavage complexes (1, 2, 4). Cells treated with etoposide acquire an apoptotic morphology, notably the condensation of chromatin at the nuclear periphery and blebbing of the plasma membrane (2, 21). HL-60 cells displayed apoptotic chromatin condensation after only 1.5-h treatment with either 100 µM etoposide or 5.8 µM camptothecin, an inhibitor of topo I (Fig. 6A). Plasma membrane changes during early apoptosis include the exposure of phosphatidylserine to the external cellular environment (22). This change was measured by binding of FITC-conjungated annexin V and counting of labeled cells by fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 6B). Activation of cysteine aspartyl proteases (caspases) (21) during the apoptosis of HL-60 cells was assayed with a fluorescent substrate and FACS analysis of viable cells (Fig. 6C). Chromatin condensation, membrane changes, and caspase activation all demonstrated that prior treatment with 100 nM TSA suppresses the apoptotic effect of etoposide (Fig. 6, A-C). In contrast, TSA did not affect apoptosis induced by the topo I inhibitor camptothecin (Fig. 6, A-C). Note that topo I does not associate with detectable amounts of deacetylase activity (Fig. 1B). An identical anti-apoptotic effect of TSA treatment was also observed for the human lung adenocarcinoma cell line H1299 and HeLa cells (data not shown).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   TSA suppresses apoptosis induced by topo II-mediated DNA damage, but not by topo I inhibition, in HL-60 cells. A, cells were treated as indicated (see "Materials and Methods" for details). Nuclear changes were visualized by indirect fluorescence microscopy after staining with Hoechst 33342 with the addition of propidium iodide (PI) to visualize necrotic cells. The nuclear morphology of cells were scored for apoptotic cells (PI-; clear bars) and necrotic cells (PI+; gray bars) and expressed as percentages of total cells in the field of view. Values are averages of two separate experiments. B, plasma membrane changes were detected by the binding of annexin V conjugated to FITC, after treatment with TSA, etoposide, or camptothecin as indicated (see "Materials and Methods"). Staining was visualized by indirect fluorescence microscopy and expressed as percentages of total cells. Bars represent S.D. values for three separate experiments. C, broad-spectrum caspase activity was detected by labeling live cells with the FAM-VAD-FMK fluorescein-conjugated caspase substrate (see "Materials and Methods") after treatment with inhibitors, as indicated. Labeled cells were detected by FACS analysis, and activity is expressed as the percentage of the viable cell subpopulation that stains positive for the substrate. Values are averages of two separate experiments.



    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The results presented show that the histone deacetylase HDAC1 is physically associated with each of the two isoforms of human topoisomerase II, topo IIalpha and topo IIbeta . The association occurs in vivo, being detectable by coimmunoprecipitation from human cell extracts and by yeast two-hybrid assay. It also occurs in vitro. GST-coupled recombinant topo IIalpha and topo IIbeta pull down significant amounts of HDAC activity from cell extracts, while recombinant HDAC1 inhibits the in vitro decatenation activity of recombinant topo IIalpha . Since completion of the work reported here, Tsai et al. (23) have reported essentially the same findings for the two very similar deacetylases HDAC1 and HDAC2. Interestingly, whereas Tsai et al. (23) find evidence for an interaction between topo IIalpha and various regions of HDAC2, including N-terminal residues 1-57, we find that only the C-terminal region of HDAC1 (residues 220-482) interacts with topo II in vitro. These two deacetylases seem to differ in their mode of interaction with topo II.

In experiments to assess the biological significance of the topo II-HDAC interaction, we analyzed the effect of the deacetylase inhibitor TSA on processes known to require topo II activity. The most striking effect so far has been on the ability of the topo II poison etoposide to drive cells into apoptosis. We show that treatment with TSA prior to the addition of etoposide suppresses apoptosis in a variety of cell lines. The effect is seen even with HL60 cells, in which apoptosis is detectable within less than 1 h, a finding that minimizes the probability that inhibition of apoptosis is due to pleiotropic effects of TSA, such as its ability to alter cell cycle progression. The inhibitory effect of TSA was detected in several p53-null cell lines, so the interaction between HDAC1 and p53 (7) cannot be responsible. Microscopically detectable chromatin remodeling is a diagnostic characteristic of cells in the later stages of apoptosis, and recent reports indicate that both topo II and histone acetylation play a role in this process (24). However, our results indicate that this is not the stage at which TSA exerts the inhibitory effect reported here. We have shown that TSA inhibition is detectable even when using an assay that measures one of the earliest changes of apoptosis, namely the alteration in membrane phospholipids detected by binding of annexin V (22). These findings argue that TSA is acting at a relatively early stage in apoptosis, prior to the onset of major changes in nuclear ultrastructure. It remains possible that TSA also effects more subtle chromatin changes, possibly those determining expression of genes required for progression through apoptosis (25). These effects are not mutually exclusive. Indeed, recent results indicate that both topo II and changes in acetylation act at various stages in the pathways by which cells progress through apoptosis (24, 26-28).

In attempting to explain the effect of TSA on etoposide-induced apoptosis, it is important to note that etoposide is a topo II poison that blocks the enzyme after DNA cleavage but prior to strand passage (4). Covalent topoisomerase-DNA cleavage complexes accumulate in the presence of such poisons. DNA replication, transcription, or helicase activity all disrupt these complexes, releasing the DNA double-strand breaks that can precipitate apoptosis (1, 4). Reducing either the accumulation of topo II-DNA complexes, or their breakdown, will both reduce DNA damage and hence apoptosis. A possible explanation for the results presented here is that HDAC-dependent chromatin remodeling is necessary for the initiation of topo II-catalyzed DNA rearrangement or for dissociation of topo II-DNA complexes, or both. If this were the case, then HDAC inhibitors such as TSA would be expected to prevent the appearance of DNA damage in the presence of topo II poisons, and consequent progression into apoptosis, exactly as we have found. Crucially, TSA has no effect on apoptosis induced by the topo I inhibitor camptothecin. We show here that topo I is not associated with HDAC1. Further support for these ideas comes from the recent results of Tsai et al. (23), who show that topo II is associated not only with HDAC1/2, but also with MTA2, a protein that is part of the NuRD chromatin remodeling complex. The NuRD complex contains both HDAC1/2 and Mi-2, a protein with ATPase/helicase activity (12).

We and others (23) find that HDAC1 can inhibit the catalytic activity of topo II in vitro. This is an important confirmation of the ability of topo II and HDAC1 to interact, but is not, at first sight, consistent with the proposition outlined above that HDAC activity facilitates topo II catalysis, or its consequences. This can be resolved by noting that the GST-HDAC1 construct used to inhibit topo II in vitro is catalytically inactive, presumably because it lacks essential protein partners such as RbAp46/48 (8, 11). It would be wrong to assume that catalytically active HDAC1, in the context of a multiprotein complex that includes both HDAC and chromatin remodeling activities (23), is also inhibitory. It might even be the case that, in vivo, topo II activity is inhibited only by association with HDAC rendered catalytically inactive by inhibitors such as TSA. Such an effect would complement the suppression of topo II activity brought about by inhibition of chromatin remodeling.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. G. Anderson for help with the FACS analysis, Dr. J. Shuttleworth for the gift of anti-CDK7 antibody and GST-cdc2 fusion protein construct, Darren A. White and Jayne S. Lavender for technical support.


    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Wellcome Trust grants (to B. M. T. and C. A. A.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 44-121-414-6824; Fax: 44-121-4146815; E-mail: b.m.turner@bham.ac.uk.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 2, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.C000824200


    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: topo, topoisomerase; TSA, trichostatin A; GST, glutathione S-transferase; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorter; CTD, C-terminal domain; Rb, retinoblastoma; HDAC, histone deacetylase.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES


1. Froelich-Ammon, S. J., and Osheroff, N. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 21429-21432[Free Full Text]
2. Kaufmann, S. H., and Earnshaw, W. C. (2000) Exp. Cell Res. 256, 42-49[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Wang, J. C. (1996) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65, 635-692[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Burden, D. A., and Osheroff, N. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1400, 139-154[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Austin, C. A., and Marsh, K. L. (1998) Bioessays 20, 215-226[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Cowell, I. G., Okorokov, A. L., Cutts, S. A., Padget, K., Bell, M., Milner, J., and Austin, C. A. (2000) Exp. Cell Res. 255, 86-94[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Murphy, M., Ahn, J., Walker, K. K., Hoffman, W. H., Evans, R. M., Levine, A. J., and George, D. L. (1999) Genes Dev. 13, 2490-2501[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Taunton, J., Hassig, C. A., and Schreiber, S. L. (1996) Science 272, 408-411[Abstract]
9. Struhl, K. (1998) Genes Dev. 12, 599-606[Free Full Text]
10. Johnson, C. A., and Turner, B. M. (1999) Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 179-188[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Ng, H. H., and Bird, A. (2000) Trends Biochem. Sci. 25, 121-126[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Zhang, Y., LeRoy, G., Seelig, H.-P., Lane, W. S., and Reinberg, D. (1998) Cell 95, 279-289[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Wade, P. A., Gegonne, A., Jones, P. L., Ballestar, E., Aubry, F., and Wolffe, A. P. (1999) Nat. Genet. 23, 62-66[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Austin, C. A., Marsh, K. L., Wasserman, R. A., Willmore, E., Sayer, P. J., Wang, J. C., and Fisher, L. M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 15739-15746[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Cowell, I. G., Willmore, E., Chalton, D., Marsh, K. L., Jazrawi, E., Fisher, L. M., and Austin, C. A. (1998) Exp. Cell Res. 243, 232-240[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. White, D. A., Belyaev, N. D., and Turner, B. M. (1999) Methods Companion Methods Enzymol. 10, 417-424
17. Nan, X., Ng, H.-H., Johnson, C. A., Laherty, C. D., Turner, B. M., Eisenman, R. N., and Bird, A. (1998) Nature 393, 386-389[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Bartel, P. L., and Fields, S. (1995) Methods Enzymol. 254, 241-263[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Brehm, A., Miska, E. A., McCance, D. J., Reid, J. L., Bannister, A. J., and Kouzarides, T. (1998) Nature 391, 597-601[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Yoshida, M., Horinouchi, S., and Beppu, T. (1995) Bioessays 17, 423-430[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Earnshaw, W. C., Martins, L. M., and Kaufmann, S. H. (1999) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 69, 383-424[CrossRef]
22. Vermes, I., Haanen, C., Steffens-Nakken, H., and Reutelingsperger, C. (1995) J. Immunol. Methods 184, 39-51[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Tsai, S. C., Valkov, N., Yang, W. M., Gump, J., Sullivan, D., and Seto, E. (2000) Nat. Genet. 26, 349-353[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Durrieu, F., Samejima, K., Fortune, J. M., Kandels-Lewis, S., Osheroff, N., and Earnshaw, W. C. (2000) Curr. Biol. 10, 923-926[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Green, D. R. (2000) Cell 102, 1-4[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Allera, C., Lazzarini, G., Patrone, E., Alberti, I., Barboro, P., Sanna, P., Melchiori, A., Parodi, S., and Balbi, C. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 10817-10822[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Ikura, T., Ogryzko, V. V., Grigoriev, M., Groisman, R., Wang, J., Horikoshi, M., Scully, R., Qin, J., and Nakatani, Y. (2000) Cell 102, 463-473[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Kratzmeier, M., Albig, W., Hanecke, K., and Doenecke, D. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 30478-30486[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.