H2O2-mediated Cross-linking between Lactoperoxidase and Myoglobin

ELUCIDATION OF PROTEIN-PROTEIN RADICAL TRANSFER REACTIONS*

Olivier M. Lardinois and Paul R. Ortiz de MontellanoDagger

From the Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0446

Received for publication, March 8, 2001, and in revised form, April 4, 2001

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The H2O2-dependent reaction of lactoperoxidase (LPO) with sperm whale myoglobin (SwMb) or horse myoglobin (HoMb) produces LPO-Mb cross-linked species, in addition to LPO and SwMb homodimers. The HoMb products are a LPO(HoMb) dimer and LPO(HoMb)2 trimer. Dityrosine cross-links are shown by their fluorescence to be present in the oligomeric products. Addition of H2O2 to myoglobin (Mb), followed by catalase to quench excess H2O2 before the addition of LPO, still yields LPO cross-linked products. LPO oligomerization therefore requires radical transfer from Mb to LPO. In contrast to native LPO, recombinant LPO undergoes little self-dimerization in the absence of Mb but occurs normally in its presence. Simultaneous addition of 3,5-dibromo-4-nitrosobenzenesulfonic acid (DBNBS) and LPO to activated Mb produces a spin-trapped radical electron paramagnetic resonance signal located primarily on LPO, confirming the radical transfer. Mutation of Tyr-103 or Tyr-151 in SwMb decreased cross-linking with LPO, but mutation of Tyr-146, Trp-7, or Trp-14 did not. However, because DBNBS-trapped LPO radicals were observed with all the mutants, DBNBS traps LPO radicals other than those involved in protein oligomerization. The results clearly establish that radical transfer occurs from Mb to LPO and suggest that intermolecularly transferred radicals may reside on residues other than those that are generated by intramolecular reactions.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Amino acid centered radicals are now established as catalytic intermediates in a variety of enzymes, including cytochrome c peroxidase (1), prostaglandin H synthase (2), ribonucleotide reductase (3), pyruvate-formate lyase (4), and galactose oxidase (5). Protein radical formation not associated with the normal function of the protein is also observed, as, for example, in the reaction of Mb1 with H2O2 (6-13). Both the catalytic and incidental protein radicals are most commonly generated by a metal-catalyzed reaction within the protein itself, but the formation of protein radicals by reaction of the protein with an exogenous species such as the hydroxyl radical is also known (14, 15). Protein radicals, particularly those not intrinsic to the catalytic mechanism, can lead to cross-linking of the protein, cleavage of the protein backbone, and the formation of protein peroxy radicals and protein peroxides (16). These radical reactions can be physiologically relevant, as in the formation of a tyrosine-cross-linked protective shell by sea urchin ovoperoxidase (17). In most situations, however, protein radicals facilitate pathological or toxicological processes (18). Despite their importance, the factors and mechanisms that control the formation, localization, delocalization, and propagation of protein free radicals remain obscure.

The reactions of sperm whale and horse heart MetMb with H2O2 have served as a useful model for the investigation of protein radicals. The early observation by EPR of a protein radical in the reaction of MetMb with H2O2 has been more precisely defined by recent work (12, 19). Site-specific mutagenesis, in conjunction with protein digestion, peptide sequencing, mass spectrometry, and EPR spectroscopy, has established that MetMb cross-linking involves the formation of Tyr-103 and Tyr-151 dityrosine cross-links (10, 12, 13). Tyr-146, the third tyrosine in the protein, forms a radical, but it may not participate in chemical reactions (13). Of the two tryptophan residues, Trp-7 and Trp-14, only Trp-14 appears to be involved in the formation of a protein-peroxy radical that can co-oxidize styrene (13, 19). Evidence has also been obtained for the formation of a radical located on Cys-110 (20), which is unique to human myoglobin, and on an aliphatic MetMb amino acid residue (21). All of these protein radicals are associated with the formation of a ferryl (FeIV=O) species in the reaction of MetMb with H2O2. Recent work indicates that the reaction of MetMb with H2O2 initially yields a transient Compound I-like species, in which the ferryl is coupled to a porphyrin rather than a protein radical (22, 23). It is therefore likely that the protein radical is generated by subsequent rapid electron transfer from the protein to the porphyrin radical. The residue that provides the electron that directly quenches the porphyrin radical is not known, but the resulting protein radical appears to transfer efficiently from one residue to another over considerable distances. Thus, radical reactions involving Tyr-103, Tyr-151, Trp-14, Cys-110 (human Mb only), and Lys-42 have been identified, and mutation of any one of these residues only suppresses the reactions at that specific site. Furthermore, the Tyr-151 radical is still formed, even though the closest Tyr-151 ring carbon is 12 Å from the heme iron, when Tyr-103 and Tyr-146, which are closer to the heme, have been mutated to phenylalanines. A relay mechanism for dispersal of the free radical center is therefore not a prerequisite for radical formation at a distal residue in MetMb.

LPO, a mammalian peroxidase, catalyzes the physiologically relevant oxidation of thiocyanide to antibacterial products, as well as the oxidation of iodide, bromide, and conventional peroxidase substrates such as ABTS and guaiacol (24). Its catalytic mechanism involves reaction with H2O2 to form a Compound I species with a FeIV=O ferryl species and a porphyrin radical cation. This initial Compound I decays to a second Compound I species in which the FeIV=O is paired with a protein radical (25, 26). We have recently shown that formation of the protein radical form of the activated enzyme leads to dimerization of LPO through the formation of a dityrosine cross-link involving residue Tyr-289 in each of two enzyme molecules (27). Spin trapping/EPR evidence was also obtained for the formation of protein radicals at sites other than the tyrosine involved in the cross-linking reaction (27). The roles of these protein radicals in LPO function remain unclear, although a previous study has argued that the protein radicals may be required for certain catalytic functions (26), and autocatalytic covalent binding of the prosthetic heme group to the LPO protein can be formulated as a radical process (28). Although the evidence is more sparse than that for MetMb, it appears that the protein radical undergoes some degree of dispersion throughout the LPO structure, but it is not known whether this dispersion is an equilibrium or unidirectional process.

As indicated by the work with MetMb and LPO, protein radicals delocalize readily, even to distant sites within a protein, once they are generated at a well-defined site, i.e. in the vicinity of the heme iron atom. In this study, we have investigated whether the protein radicals thus generated can transfer from one protein to another and whether this mechanism of radical propagation can produce protein radicals in the second protein distinct from those formed by radical generation within the protein itself.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- SwMb, HoMb, equine apomyoglobin, and LPO from bovine milk were acquired from Sigma. The commercial LPO (80-150 units/mg protein; A412/A280 = 0.88-0.95) shown to be homogeneous by SDS-PAGE was desalted over prepacked Sephadex G-25 (PD-10) gel filtration cartridges before use. The commercial SwMb and HoMb were further purified by chromatography on a (2.6 × 100-cm) Sephacryl S-200 HR column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The column was equilibrated and run at 0.5 ml/min in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 6.8. Prepacked Sephadex G-25 (PD-10) gel filtration cartridges were purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. All other chemicals were of analytical grade and were purchased from Sigma or Roche Molecular Biochemicals.

Analytical Methods-- Absorption spectra were recorded on a Cary 1E UV-visible spectrometer (Varian, Victoria, Australia). Dityrosine content was measured with a PerkinElmer Life Sciences LS 50 B fluorimeter (Beaconsfield, United Kingdom). SDS-PAGE was done on a Pharmacia LKB Phast System (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). EPR measurements were performed with an ER/200D EPR spectrometer from Brucker, Inc. (Billerica, MA). Circular dichroism was measured with a J-710 spectropolarimeter from Jasco (Tokyo, Japan).

Preparation and Expression of Site-directed Protein Mutants-- The mutant SwMb proteins and wild-type recombinant rLPO were expressed and purified as described previously (12, 13, 19, 28). Recombinant SwMb proteins were oxidized to the met form using a slight excess of K3Fe(CN)6 and then passed over a PD-10 column eluted with 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 6.8. The protein samples were then further purified by chromatography on a (2.6 × 100-cm) Sephacryl S-200 HR column and concentrated by ultrafiltration (Centricon YM 10; Amicon; molecular weight cut off = 10,000) before use. The column was equilibrated and run as described for the native protein (see above). The far ultraviolet circular dichroism spectra of wild-type and mutant Mb proteins at pH 6.8 were fully superimposable (data not shown). In all of the SwMb tyrosine and tryptophan mutants examined, the UV-visible spectra observed were nearly identical to those of the native protein, indicating that changes to the structure in the vicinity of the heme iron were minimal (data not shown).

Activity and Concentration Measurements-- Peroxidase activities were determined with ABTS as the reducing substrate (29). Formation of the ABTS radical cation was monitored at 414 nm (epsilon ABTS·, 414 = 36 mM-1 cm-1; assay conditions: 100 µM ABTS, 100 µM H2O2, and 50 mM sodium acetate, pH 4.5). Enzyme concentrations were estimated by measuring the absorbance of the heme Soret band using the following extinction coefficients: epsilon LPO, 412 = 112.3 mM-1 cm-1 (30), SwMb epsilon MetMb, 409 = 157 mM-1 cm-1 (31), and HoMb epsilon MetMb, 409 = 188 mM-1 cm-1 (31).

SDS-PAGE of Protein Samples-- Cross-linking experiments were carried out at 25 °C for 5 min. The reactions were terminated by addition of the SDS-PAGE sample buffer. Samples were allowed to stand in SDS for 10 min and heated at 100 °C for 2 min before loading onto the gels, which were developed and then stained with Coomassie Blue.

Cationic Ion-exchange Chromatography-- A stock solution of 72 µM LPO and 741 µM HoMb was prepared in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 6.8. The LPO-HoMb stock solution was incubated with H2O2 at a final concentration of 1 mM for 5 min at 25 °C. Excess H2O2 was then consumed by incubation with catalase (1.25 units/ml) for 15 min. The resulting solution was applied to a 2.6 × 20-cm SP Sepharose Fast Flow column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) equilibrated with 50 mM potassium phosphate, pH 6.8. The column was washed with 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) and then eluted using the stepwise procedure described in the text (0-450 mM NaCl). The fractions corresponding to LPO-HoMb heteromers (as assessed by SDS-PAGE analysis) were pooled in two lots. Each lot was desalted and concentrated by ultrafiltration (Centricon YM 30; Amicon; molecular weight cut off = 30,000). The concentrated samples contained about 4 mg total protein/ml and were stored at 4 °C for subsequent analysis.

Enzymatic Digestion of the LPO-HoMb Heteromers-- A 100-µl sample of each fraction of heteromers separated by cation-exchange chromatography was taken for analysis. The samples were diluted to a volume of 2 ml with 8 M urea in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, containing 2 mM CaCl2 before they were concentrated down to 100 µl by diafiltration (Centricon YM 30; Amicon). After adding 20 µl of 50 mM dithiothreitol, the samples were incubated at 60 °C for 60 min. The resulting mixtures were then diluted to 380 µl with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, containing 2 mM CaCl2 and treated with Pronase (1:10, w/w) for 24 h and leucine aminopeptidase (1:25, w/w) for 12 h at 37 °C. The hydrolyzed samples were frozen and stored at -70 °C for subsequent analysis.

Reverse Phase HPLC Analysis of the LPO-HoMb Heteromers-- A dityrosine standard or LPO-Mb hydrolysate samples were injected onto a Vydac 218TP54, 4.6 × 250-mm, C18 reverse phase HPLC column. The column was eluted with a linear gradient rising from 100% solvent A to 10% solvent B in 45 min (solvent A, 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in water; solvent B, 0.085% trifluoroacetic acid in acetonitrile). A rapid gradient to 90% solvent B and then back to 100% solvent A was then run to regenerate the column. The eluent was monitored with a UV-visible detector set at 280 nm. Fluorescent compounds were detected with a PerkinElmer Life Sciences 650-10S fluorescence spectrophotometer (lambda ex = 280 nm, lambda em = 410 nm) coupled in-line with the HPLC system.

Preparation of the Dityrosine Standard-- Dityrosine was prepared using the enzymatic method of Amadò et al. (32) and purified by reverse phase HPLC as described previously (27).

Spin Trapping Experiments-- EPR measurements were performed with an ER/200D EPR spectrometer operating at 9.80 GHz with a TM cavity. X-Band, first derivative absorption spectra were obtained with the following settings: microwave power, 25 mW; center field, 3480 gauss; time constant, 100 ms; sweep time, 50 s; modulation, 0.32 millitesla at a frequency of 100 kHz; and total sweep width, 125 gauss. Spectra were taken at 18 °C to 22 °C. The magnetic field range and center were estimated by comparing the EPR spectrum from a LPO/H2O2 reaction mixture with that of the stable nitroso compound potassium nitrosodisulfonate. The potassium nitrosodisulfonate splitting was taken to be 13.091 gauss, and the center peak was taken to correspond to a g of 2.0056 (33). The reactions were all performed in 50 mM potassium phosphate solution (pH 6.8) containing 200 µM diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid to inhibit possible catalysis by trace transition metals.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

H2O2-mediated Cross-linking between LPO and MetMb-- Fig. 1 shows the profile of mixtures of LPO and MetMb on a SDS-polyacrylamide gel after incubation with H2O2. Two types of Mb, HoMb and SwMb, were utilized. As already known (12, 13, 27), H2O2 causes the covalent oligomerization of LPO (Fig. 1, A and B, lane 2) and SwMb (Fig. 1B, lane 4) but no more than a barely detectable trace on the gel with HoMb (Fig. 1A, lane 4). When the HoMb-LPO mixtures were exposed to H2O2, two new bands occurred at positions corresponding to Mr 97,000 and Mr 127,000 (Fig. 1A, lane 6), suggesting the formation of two types of heteromers, a dimer (LPO-Mb) and a trimer (LPO(Mb)2), respectively. Traces of two or three closely spaced bands of Mr ~200,000, likely due to (LPO)2 homodimers and possibly also due to (LPO)2-Mb heterotrimers, were also present. One additional band was obtained with a molecular weight of ~153,000 using SwMb in place of HoMb (Fig. 1B, lane 6) suggesting the formation of a LPO(Mb)3 heterotetramer. These dimeric and oligomeric entities could not be attributed to S-S bond formation because (a) the protein samples were treated with 2-mercaptoethanol before electrophoresis, and (b) there are no cysteine residues in SwMb or HoMb. Inclusion of HoMb in the LPO/H2O2 system both decreased LPO homodimer and homotrimer formation and increased LPO-HoMb hetero-oligomerization in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 2). This suggests that HoMb competes with the two residues on the LPO surface involved in homotrimer formation. Heteromer formation increases to a maximum using reaction mixtures containing 1:40:40 stoichiometric concentrations of LPO, Mb, and H2O2, respectively (data not shown). No heteromer was observed by SDS-PAGE in incubations of apo-HoMb, LPO, and H2O2 (data not shown). Significant hetero-oligomerization only occurred when ferric HoMb or ferric SwMb was incubated with H2O2 in the presence of LPO.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   A, SDS-PAGE analysis of the cross-linking between HoMb and LPO. Lane 1, LPO; lane 2, LPO + H2O2; lane 3, HoMb; lane 4, HoMb + H2O2; lanes 5 and 6, HoMb + LPO + H2O2. B, SDS-PAGE analysis of the cross-linking between SwMb and LPO. Lane 1, LPO; lane 2, LPO + H2O2; lane 3, SwMb; lane 4, SwMb + H2O2; lanes 5 and 6, SwMb + LPO + H2O2. The following concentrations were used: [H2O2] = 312 µM, [LPO] = 10 µM, [HoMb] = 375 µM, [SwMb] = 375 µM, and [polyacrylamide] = 20% (lanes 1-5) and 7.5% (lane 6).


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Cross-linking between HoMb and LPO: effect of the amount of HoMb added. Lane 1, LPO; lane 2, LPO + H2O2; lanes 3-6, HoMb + LPO + H2O2. The following concentrations were used: [H2O2] = 125 µM; [LPO] = 10 µM; [HoMb] = 47 µM (lane 3), 94 µM (lane 4), 188 µM (lane 5), and 375 µM (lane 6); and [polyacrylamide] = 7.5%.

Isolation and Characterization of the LPO-HoMb Heteromers-- The LPO-HoMb heteromers were separated by chromatography on a cationic exchange column (SP Sepharose Fast Flow). A typical elution pattern (Fig. 3A) indicates the presence of three major protein components (peaks 1-3) and several minor components. One of the minor components is the LPO homodimer, which elutes at ~170 ml (Fig. 3A). The fraction corresponding to the earliest eluting major peak (peak 1) contained only HoMb and was not investigated further. The fractions corresponding to peaks 2 and 3 were pooled individually and desalted and concentrated by ultrafiltration. The molecular weights and the purities of the resulting solutions were determined on a SDS-polyacrylamide gel (Fig. 3B). As shown, peak 2 yielded two bands with apparent molecular weights of 108,000 and 130,000, which are consistent with the LPO-HoMb heterodimer and the LPO(HoMb)2 heterotrimer, respectively. Peak 3 also yielded two bands, one of which was of higher molecular weight than that of native LPO and corresponded to the LPO-HoMb heterodimer at Mr 97,000. 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   A, separation of LPO-HoMb heteromers by chromatography on a cationic exchange column. Elution profile before (- - -) and after (____) incubation with 1.3 equivalents of H2O2. The following concentrations were used: [LPO] = 72 µM, [HoMb] = 741 µM, [catalase] = 0.4 nM, and [H2O2] = 1 mM. B, SDS-PAGE analysis (7.5%) of the main fractions isolated on the cationic exchange column. The sample were reduced by 2-mercaptoethanol and boiled before electrophoresis. Lane 1, LPO; lane 2, LPO+ H2O2; lane 3, peak 2; lane 4, peak 3. The following concentrations were used: [LPO] = 10 µM, and [H2O2] = 30 µM.

The reactions of some hemoproteins with H2O2 are known to result in oligomerization of the proteins due to the formation of tyrosine-tyrosine cross-links (10, 34, 35). The dityrosine cross-links can be detected by their characteristic ultraviolet fluorescence (36, 37). To evaluate the presence of dityrosine cross-links between LPO and Mb, the fractions corresponding to peaks 2 and 3 were pooled individually, desalted, and concentrated by ultrafiltration as described above. They were then digested with Pronase and leucine aminopeptidase. Analysis of the hydrolysates of the two peaks by reverse phase HPLC (Fig. 4, A and B) showed in both cases a product eluting at 21 min with a strong fluorescence at 410 nm (excitation, 280 nm). The identity of this fluorescent compound was confirmed by demonstrating co-migration with authentic dityrosine on reverse phase HPLC (Fig. 4C). The fluorescence excitation and emission maxima of the fluorescent compounds were virtually identical to those of authentic, purified dityrosine at acid, neutral, and alkaline pH (data not shown), providing strong additional evidence that LPO-Mb hetero-oligomerization was due to the formation of tyrosine-tyrosine cross-links between the two proteins.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Reverse phase HPLC analysis of the proteolytic hydrolysate of peak 2 (A) and peak 3 (B) from the cationic exchange column and of a dityrosine standard (C). The pooled fractions of peak 2 (95-115 ml) and peak 3 (132.5-147.5 ml) were desalted, concentrated by ultrafiltration, and subjected to proteolytic hydrolysis and analysis by reverse phase HPLC as described under "Experimental Procedures." The fluorescence of the column effluent at 410 nm (excitation, 280 nm) is shown.

Protein-Protein Radical Transfer Reactions-- The possible occurrence of a radical transfer from Mb to LPO in the Mb/H2O2/LPO system was investigated by sequentially adding catalase and then LPO to the Mb/H2O2 reaction mixture. Catalase and LPO were added 10 and 20 s after H2O2, respectively, to allow time for the catalase to remove unreacted H2O2 and thus to ensure that cross-linking was not due to LPO radicals formed by direct reaction with H2O2. As can be seen (compare Fig. 5 with Fig. 1), adding catalase before LPO had little effect on the type of cross-linked products that were formed. In particular, the dimeric and trimeric LPO-Mb forms were observable despite the addition of catalase to the HoMb incubation (Fig. 5A, lanes 1 and 6). Similar results were obtained with SwMb (Fig. 5B, lanes 1 and 6), except that additional bands are present due to the simultaneous formation of SwMb homodimers. Control experiments performed in the absence of Mb showed that (a) when catalase was omitted, monomeric LPO was partially converted to dimeric and trimeric products (Fig. 5, A and B, lane 5) and (b) addition of catalase 10 s before the addition of LPO prevented oligomerization of the enzyme (Fig. 5, A and B, lane 4). Thus, under the conditions used, catalase is effective in removing unreacted H2O2 before the addition of LPO. Thus, the oligomerization of LPO observed in the presence of Mb in this experimental protocol is the result of a radical transfer from Mb to LPO.


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   A, cross-linking between HoMb and LPO: effect of time-delayed injection of catalase and LPO. Lanes 1 and 6, complete system with HoMb, H2O2, catalase, and LPO; lane 2, as described in lane 1, except that H2O2 was not added; lane 3, as described in lane 1, except that LPO was not added; lane 4, as described in lane 1, except that HoMb was not added; lane 5, as described in lane 1, except that HoMb and catalase were not added. B, cross-linking between SwMb and LPO: effect of time-delayed injection of catalase and LPO. Lanes 1 and 6, complete system with SwMb, H2O2, catalase, and LPO; lane 2, as described in lane 1, except that H2O2 was not added; lane 3, as described in lane 1, except that LPO was not added; lane 4, as described in lane 1, except that SwMb was not added; lane 5, as described in lane 1, except that SwMb and catalase were not added. Catalase and LPO were added to the incubation 10 and 20 s, respectively, after the addition of H2O2, regardless of whether Mb was present or not. The following concentrations were used: [LPO] = 11 µM, [HoMb] = 350 µM, [SwMb] = 350 µM, [catalase] = 0.3 µM, [H2O2] = 500 µM, and [polyacrylamide] = 20% (lanes 1-5) and 7.5% (lane 6).

Essentially the same result was obtained using wild-type rLPO in place of native LPO (Fig. 6). rLPO displayed an enzymatic activity that was 50% lower than that of the native protein (data not shown) and, in unexpected contrast to the native form, exhibited little self-dimerization upon treatment with H2O2 (Fig. 6, lane 5). Nevertheless, ~50% of the monomeric rLPO migrates in the location of LPO-Mb heterodimers and LPO homodimers when treated with H2O2 in the presence of HoMb (Fig. 6, lanes 1 and 6).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Cross-linking between HoMb and rLPO. Lanes 1 and 6, complete system with HoMb, H2O2, catalase, and rLPO; lane 2, as described in lane 1, except that H2O2 was not added; lane 3, as described in lane 1, except that rLPO was not added; lane 4, as described in lane 1, except that HoMb was not added; lane 5, as described in lane 1, except that HoMb and catalase were not added. Catalase and LPO were added to the incubation 10 and 20 s, respectively, after the addition of H2O2, regardless of whether Mb was present or not. The following concentrations were used: [rLPO] = 9.5 µM, [HoMb] = 350 µM, [catalase] = 0.3 µM, [H2O2] = 500 µM, and [polyacrylamide] = 20% (lanes 1-5) and 7.5% (lane 6).

An intense ESR spectrum characteristic of an immobilized nitroxide was detected when DBNBS was simultaneously added with LPO after preincubation of Mb/H2O2 with catalase to remove excess H2O2 (Fig. 7A). No signal could be detected in the absence of either SwMb (Fig. 7B) or H2O2 (Fig. 7C), indicating that formation of the EPR signal requires the presence of this protein and is not due to radicals formed by the direct reaction of LPO with H2O2. A much weaker signal was observed with the SwMb/H2O2/DBNBS system in the absence of LPO (Fig. 7D). This signal, which is reproducibly less than 30% of the intensity of the signal from the complete system, is believed to originate from direct reaction of H2O2-activated SwMb with DBNBS. Identical behavior and signals were observed when HoMb was used in place of SwMb (data not shown).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   ESR spectra obtained from a mixture of SwMb, H2O2, catalase, and LPO in the presence of DBNBS. A, complete system with SwMb, H2O2, catalase, LPO, and DBNBS; B, as described in A, except that SwMb was not added; C, as described in A, except that H2O2 was not added; D, as described in A, except that LPO was not added. Catalase and LPO were added to the incubation 10 and 20 s, respectively, after the addition of H2O2, regardless of whether Mb was present or not. DBNBS was added simultaneously with LPO. The following concentrations were used: [LPO] = 290 µM, [SwMb] = 2.3 mM, [catalase] = 0.15 µM, [H2O2] = 3.6 mM, and [DBNBS] = 18 mM. The instrumental parameters were as follows: modulation amplitude, 1G; time constant, 100 ms; receiver gain, 5 × 105; modulation frequency, 100 kHz; microwave frequency, 9.80 GHz; and microwave power, 25 mW.

Involvement of Specific Mb Residues-- To identify the residues involved in cross-linking and in radical transfer reactions, site-directed mutant Mb proteins in which the tyrosine or tryptophan residues were replaced by phenylalanines were used. The results of cross-linking experiments carried out with mixtures of native LPO and recombinant Mb proteins are shown in Fig. 8A. The double integrated areas of the ESR spectra obtained when DBNBS was added simultaneously with the LPO to the reaction mixture are shown in Fig. 8B. The areas of the corresponding background signals obtained in the absence of LPO are also shown. As before, catalase and LPO were added 10 and 20 s, respectively, after H2O2 to remove unreacted H2O2 and to ensure that the cross-links and/or ESR signals were not due to radicals formed by direct reaction of LPO with H2O2. Replacement of Tyr-103 or Tyr-151 significantly inhibited cross-linking of the SwMb with LPO, and the triple tyrosine mutant gave no detectable cross-linking (Fig. 8A). This implicates these two tyrosine residues in the hetero-oligomerization process. In contrast, removal of Tyr-146, Trp-7, or Trp-14 had little or no effect. Spin trapping experiments showed the presence of radical species capable of reaction with DBNBS in the incubations of native LPO with all the recombinant Mb proteins that were investigated (Fig. 8B). Maximal ESR signal intensities were obtained with the single Y103F and Y151F mutants as well as with the triple tyrosine mutant (Fig. 8B). These intensities are approximately double the intensities seen with the other Mb mutants or with the wild-type enzyme. This may result from an increased efficiency of radical transfer from Mb to LPO caused by blocking the tyrosine radical to dityrosine decay pathway.


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   A, cross-linking between recombinant SwMb and native LPO. Lane 1, complete system with SwMb wild-type, H2O2, catalase, and LPO; lane 2, as described in lane 1, but with Y103F mutant in place of wild-type; lane 3, as described in lane 1, but with Y146F mutant in place of wild-type; lane 4, as described in lane 1, but with Y151F mutant in place of wild-type; lane 5, as described in lane 1, but with Y103F/Y146F/Y151F mutant in place of wild-type; lane 6, as described in lane 1, but with W7F mutant in place of wild-type; lane 7, as described in lane 1, but with W14F mutant in place of wild-type; lane 8, as described in lane 1, but with W7F/W14F mutant in place of wild-type. The following concentrations were used: [LPO] = 11 µM, [recombinant SwMb] = 350 µM each, [catalase] = 0.3 µM, [H2O2] = 500 µM, and [polyacrylamide] = 20%. Catalase and LPO were added to the incubation 10 and 20 s, respectively, after the addition of H2O2, regardless of whether Mb was present or not. B, intensity of the ESR signal when DBNBS was added 10 s after the addition of catalase in the above-mentioned reaction mixtures. , complete system with recombinant Mb, H2O2, catalase, LPO, and DBNBS; black-square, system with recombinant Mb, H2O2, catalase, and DBNBS, but no LPO, for comparison. The following concentrations were used: [LPO] = 290 µM, [recombinant SwMb] = 1.80 mM each, [catalase] = 0.15 µM, and [H2O2] = 3.6 mM. ESR parameters were the same as those described in the Fig. 6 legend.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The formation of SwMb homodimers and the analogous formation of LPO homodimers on reaction of these hemoproteins with H2O2 were established by earlier studies (27, 38). However, the formation of hetero-oligomeric species involving the cross-linking of LPO to one, two, or possibly more Mb molecules (Fig. 1) is a new observation. As found earlier for the Mb and LPO homodimers, fluorescence spectroscopy indicates that the hetero-oligomeric LPO-Mb species, like the Mb and LPO homodimers, are held together by dityrosine cross-links (Fig. 3). Interestingly, LPO-Mb oligomers are formed with both SwMb and HoMb, even though HoMb does not self-dimerize because it lacks the Tyr-151 residue that is absolutely required for homodimer formation (Fig. 1). Earlier studies established that Tyr-151 was necessary for SwMb homodimerization, although the principal dityrosine cross-link was formed between Tyr-151 of one molecule and Tyr-103 of the other molecule (10). Tyr-146, which is buried in the protein, is not involved in dimerization reactions, but Tyr-151 can cross-link to itself. The dityrosine link between SwMb and LPO could therefore involve Tyr-151 or Tyr-103 of Mb. Because HoMb lacks Tyr-151, its dityrosine cross-link to LPO must be through Tyr-103. This inference is strongly supported by the finding that (a) mutation of either Tyr-103 or Tyr-151 to a phenylalanine in SwMb greatly decreases oligomerization and (b) mutation of both Tyr-103 and Tyr-151 suppresses oligomerization, whereas mutation of Tyr-146, Trp-7, or Trp-14 has no effect on the reaction (Fig. 8).

The LPO tyrosine residue linked to the tyrosine in Mb is more difficult to define. One possibility is that the link involves Tyr-289, which is the residue that is also involved in LPO self-dimerization (27). The fact that LPO dimer formation is attenuated in the presence of SwMb or HoMb supports this interpretation, but the evidence is inconclusive because trapping of a LPO radical at another site if the LPO radical is able to exchange among several sites on the protein would still diminish the formation of LPO dimers. Furthermore, the formation of LPO(HoMb)2 trimers involving dityrosine bonds virtually requires that at least two tyrosines in LPO must be able to cross-link to Mb to generate the HoMb-LPO-HoMb structure. In the case of SwMb, formation of the LPO(HoMb)2 trimer does not absolutely require the involvement of two LPO tyrosine residues because SwMb has two tyrosines that can undergo cross-linking reactions. It is therefore theoretically possible that the trimer has the structure LPO-SwMb-SwMb, so that there is only one bond to the LPO unit. However, the formation of a LPO(HoMb)2 trimer indicates that at least two tyrosines in LPO are available for cross-linking to HoMb.

Dityrosine cross-links are formed by the coupling of two tyrosine radicals in a radical recombination process, hence radicals must be present on both tyrosine residues for efficient coupling. To determine whether a protein radical present on a Mb molecule can be transferred to a tyrosine residue in LPO, Mb was exposed to a limited excess of H2O2, and catalase was then added to quench the remaining H2O2 before LPO was added to scavenge the excess peroxide. Under conditions in which the excess H2O2 is removed efficiently, cross-linking of LPO is still observed. This finding requires transfer of the Mb radical to LPO, followed by condensation with an Mb radical (Fig. 5). The radical transfer could involve specific residues, for example, transfer of the radical from Tyr-151 to the recipient site on LPO, or could result from a more general and undefined process that does not require the interaction of specific Mb residues with receptor residues in LPO. The finding that mutation of Tyr-103 and/or Tyr-151, but not Tyr-146, Trp-7, or Trp-14, inhibits or suppresses oligomerization clearly establishes that the electron transfer is not mandatorily mediated by Tyr-146, Trp-7, or Trp-14, although it is not possible to determine whether it is mediated by Tyr-103 or Tyr-151 because these two residues are required to form the dityrosine link. However, the finding that the trapping of LPO radicals by DBNBS is unimpaired when the triple tyrosine mutant of SwMb is used as the radical donor (Fig. 8) and is observed even in the absence of oligomerization indicates that radical transfer occurs in the absence of any of the residues that have been demonstrated to act as radical sites in Mb. Thus, although dimerization requires the participation of specific tyrosines in Mb, the radical transfer to LPO does not.

One very interesting finding is that rLPO is much less susceptible to self-dimerization than the native protein in the absence of Mb, but the two proteins form equal amounts of homodimers in the presence of Mb. Previous work with the heterologously expressed protein has shown that the primary difference between rLPO and LPO is that the heme group is covalently bound to the protein in the native enzyme, but only partially so in the recombinant protein (28). This difference, which is consistent with the finding that the heme-protein cross-linking reaction is autocatalytic (28), readily explains our finding that the initial activity of the recombinant protein is half that of the native enzyme. However, the lack of self-dimerization in the absence of Mb is puzzling because the spectroscopic evidence suggests that the secondary and tertiary structures of the recombinant protein are unperturbed. The finding that self-dimerization does not occur in the absence of Mb but occurs normally in its presence suggests that the radical obtained by transfer from Mb to rLPO may be located at a different site from that at which it is located when generated by direct reaction of rLPO with H2O2.

The present results establish that (a) the HoMb and SwMb protein radicals can be transferred to LPO, (b) none of the residues known to bear unpaired electron density in SwMb is specifically required for the radical transfer, and (c) the radical transferred to rLPO can support dimerization with Mb, even though the radicals generated by direct reaction of rLPO with H2O2 only very poorly yield the usual rLPO homodimer. This demonstration that radical transfer occurs between Mb and LPO complements recent reports that incubation of Mb with H2O2 in the presence of serum albumin produces EPR-detectable serum albumin-derived radicals through a radical transfer mechanism (39-41). However, it was concluded from the serum albumin experiments that a peroxy radical centered on Trp-14 was responsible for electron abstraction from, and therefore radical transfer to, serum albumin (40). Our finding that both the W7F and W14F SwMb mutant are fully able to transfer a radical to LPO clearly shows that neither tryptophan is essential for this reaction. It is possible that the Trp-14-peroxy radical participates in the reaction when present, but it is not essential for the radical transfer. The radical transfer thus appears to occur directly from the amino acid radicals in Mb. This finding is more closely mimicked by the finding that free tyrosine facilitates the oxidation of serum albumin by horseradish peroxidase (41), a reaction that presumably occurs by direct radical transfer from the free tyrosine radical to the protein.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM32488.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: School of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0446. Tel.: 415-476-2903; Fax: 415-502-4728; E-mail: ortiz@cgl.ucsf.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 10, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M102084200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: Mb, myoglobin; MetMb, metmyoglobin; HoMb, horse myoglobin; SwMb, sperm whale myoglobin; heme, iron protoporphyrin IX regardless of the oxidation and ligation states; LPO, lactoperoxidase; rLPO, recombinant LPO; DBNBS, 3,5-dibromo-4-nitrosobenzenesulfonic acid; EPR, electron paramagnetic resonance; ABTS, 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid; SDS-PAGE, SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Sivaraja, M., Goodin, D. B., Smith, M., and Hoffman, B. M. (1989) Science 245, 738-740[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Tsai, A., Wu, G., Palmer, G., Bambai, B., Koehn, J. A., Marshall, P. J., and Kulmacz, R. J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 21695-21700[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Shalin, M., Petersson, L., Graslund, A., Ehrenberg, A., Sjöberg, B.-M., and Thelander, L. (1987) Biochemistry 26, 5541-5548[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Volker Wagner, A. F., Frey, M., Neugebauer, F. A., Schäfer, W., and Knappe, J. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 996-1000[Abstract]
5. Whittaker, M. M., and Whittaker, J. W. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 9610-9613[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Yonetani, T., and Schleyer, H. (1967) J. Biol. Chem. 242, 1974-1979[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. King, N. K., and Winfield, M. E. (1963) J. Biol. Chem. 238, 1520-1528[Free Full Text]
8. Miki, H., Harada, K., Yamazaki, I., Tamura, M., and Watanabe, H. (1989) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 275, 354-362[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. King, N. K., Looney, F. D., and Winfield, M. E. (1967) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 133, 65-82
10. Tew, D., and Ortiz de Montellano, P. R. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 17880-17886[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Catalano, C. E., Choe, Y. S., and Ortiz de Montellano, P. R. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 10534-10541[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Wilks, A., and Ortiz de Montellano, P. R. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 8827-8833[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Rao, S., Wilks, A., and Ortiz de Montellano, P. R. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 803-809[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Fancy, D., and Kodadek, T. (1998) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 247, 420-426[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Garrison, W. M. (1987) Chem. Rev. 87, 381-398
16. Davies, M. J., Fu, S., Wang, H., and Dean, R. T. (1999) Free Radic. Biol. Med. 27, 1151-1163[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Foerder, C. A, and Shapiro, B. M. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 74, 4214-4218[Abstract]
18. Stadtman, E. R., and Berlett, B. S. (1997) Chem. Res. Toxicol. 10, 485-494[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Degray, J. A., Gunther, M. R., Tschirret-Guth, R., Ortiz de Montellano, P. R., and Mason, R. P. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 2359-2362[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Witting, P. K, Douglas, D. J., and Mauk, A. G. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 20391-20398[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Fenwick, C. W., and English, A. M. (1996) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 12236-12237[CrossRef]
22. Matsui, T., Ozaki, S., and Watanabe, Y. (1999) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 9952-9957[CrossRef]
23. Egawa, T., Shimada, H., and Ishimura, Y. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 34858-34866[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Thomas, E. L. (1985) in The Lactoperoxidase System: Chemistry and Biological Significance (Pruitt, K. M. , and Tenovuo, J. O., eds) , pp. 31-54, Marcel Dekker, New York
25. Dunford, H. B. (1999) Heme Peroxidases , p. 20, Wiley-VCH, New York
26. Courtin, F., Michot, J.-L., Virion, A., Pommier, J., and Deme, D. (1984) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 121, 463-470[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Lardinois, O. M., Medzihradszky, K. F., and Ortiz de Montellano, P. R. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 35441-35448[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Depillis, G. D., Ozaki, S.-I., Kuo, J. M., Maltby, D. A., and Ortiz de Montellano, P. R. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 8857-8860[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Childs, R. E., and Bardsley, W. E. (1975) Biochem. J. 145, 93-103[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Ohlsson, P.-I., and Paul, K.-G. (1983) Acta Chem. Scand. 37, 917-921
31. Antonini, E., and Brunori, M. (1971) Hemoglobin and Myoglobin in Their Reactions with Ligands , p. 44, Elsevier, New York
32. Amadò, R., Aeschbach, R., and Neukom, H. (1984) Methods Enzymol. 107, 377-388[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Kooser, R. G., Volland, W. V., and Freed, J. H. (1969) J. Chem. Phys. 50, 5243-5250
34. Spangler, D. S., and Erman, J. E. (1986) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 872, 155-157[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Giulivi, C., and Davies, K. J. A. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 8752-8759[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Andersen, S. O. (1966) Acta Physiol. Scand. 66 Suppl. 263, 1-81[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Gross, A. J., and Sizer, I. W. (1959) J. Biol. Chem. 234, 1611-1614[Free Full Text]
38. Rice, R. H., Lee, Y. M., and Brown, W. D. (1983) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 221, 417-427[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Østdal, H., Skibsted, L. H., and Andersen, H. J. (1997) Free Radic. Biol. Med. 23, 754-761[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Irwin, J. A., Østdal, H., and Davies, M. J. (1999) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 362, 94-104[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Østdal, H., Andersen, H. J., and Davies, M. J. (1999) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 362, 105-112[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.