Inhibition of Flp Recombinase by the Topoisomerase I-targeting Drugs, Camptothecin and NSC-314622*

Rikke From Frøhlich, Stefan Gude Hansen, Michael LisbyDagger, Ian Grainge§, Ole Westergaard, Makkuni Jayaram§, and Birgitta Ruth Knudsen||

From the Department of Molecular and Structural Biology, University of Aarhus, Building 130, C. F. Møllers Allé, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark and the § Section of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712

Received for publication, December 20, 2000, and in revised form, January 4, 2001



    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES

Recombinases of the lambda -Int family and type IB topoisomerases act by introducing transient single strand breaks in DNA using chemically identical reaction schemes. Recent structural data have supported the relationship between the two enzyme groups by revealing considerable similarities in the architecture of their catalytic pockets. In this study we show that the Int-type recombinase Flp is inhibited by the two structurally unrelated topoisomerase I-directed anti-cancer drugs, camptothecin (CPT) and NSC-314622. The interaction of these drugs with topoisomerase I is very specific with several single amino acid substitutions conferring drug resistance to the enzyme. Thus, the observed interaction of CPT and NSC-314622 with Flp, which is comparable to their interaction with the cleavage complex formed by topoisomerase I, strongly supports a close mechanistic and evolutionary relationship between the two enzymes. The results suggest that Flp and other Int family recombinases may provide model systems for dissecting the molecular mechanisms of topoisomerase I-directed anti-cancer therapeutic agents.



    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES

Members of the integrase (Int)1 family of site-specific recombinases (lambda -integrase, P1 Cre recombinase, Escherichia coli XerC/XerD recombinase, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Flp, and Zygosaccharomyces rouxii R recombinases among several others) all carry out conservative site-specific recombination using a basic type IB topoisomerase reaction scheme (1, 2). In the first step of recombination, an active site tyrosine nucleophile attacks the target phosphodiester bond in DNA to generate a 3'-phosphotyrosyl linkage and a free 5'-hydroxyl group. In the second step leading to strand rejoining, the 5'-hydroxyl group is the nucleophile, and the 3'-phosphotyrosyl bond is its target. The nucleophilic attack is directed across partner substrates so that strand ligation occurs in the recombinant configuration, which is opposed to the typical type IB topoisomerase reaction in which ligation restores the original phosphodiester bond (3). However, the two ligation modes are not mutually exclusive, as evident from the fact that some Int recombinases can relax supercoiled DNA in vitro under certain conditions while some type IB topoisomerases can mediate recombination and resolution of Holliday junctions (4-8). Recent structural data have further consolidated the relationship between the Int family recombinases and the type IB topoisomerases. Despite the lack of overall sequence homology between the two enzyme groups, the tertiary folds within the catalytic domains are strikingly similar between the Int-type recombinases, including Flp (9) and Cre (10), and eukaryotic topoisomerase I (topo I) (11-14). Moreover, the critical catalytic moieties include two nearly identical tetrads, RHRH/W in the recombinases and RKRH in the topoisomerases, together with the invariant tyrosine nucleophile (1, 11).

In this study we have further probed the functional relationship between the Int family recombinase and type IB topoisomerase active sites by investigating the sensitivity of Flp toward camptothecin (CPT) (reviewed in Refs. 3, 15, and 16) and the newly synthesized CPT-like agent NSC-314622 (17). CPT and its derivatives are among the most promising anti-cancer drugs available today and have long been known specifically to target topo I in human cells. Although NSC-314622 is structurally unrelated to the camptothecins, its mode of action appears to be similar to that of CPT (17). Both drugs inhibit the religation step of topo I catalysis, whereas they have no effect on the cleavage reaction (16-19). For the camptothecins, it is well established that the drugs do not interact with either topo I or DNA separately (19). Rather, they form a ternary complex with the cleavage intermediate, blocking the active site of the covalently bound enzyme (18, 20). In the present study we demonstrate that the Int type recombinase, the Flp protein, is inhibited by CPT and NSC-314622. This is the first report of an enzyme other than eukaryotic topo I being sensitive toward these drugs. The results demonstrate several similarities and subtle differences between Flp and topo I in the mode of inhibition by the two drugs and suggest that the simple members of the Int family such as Flp and Cre may be exploited to dissect the molecular action of the topo I-directed anti-cancer drugs.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES

Materials-- CPT was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (C9911), and NSC-314622 was a kind gift from Dr. Yves Pommier (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). Both drugs were dissolved and stored in 100% Me2SO.

Purification of Flp-- Wild type Flp and Flp(Y343F) were purified as described by Prasad et al. (21). The concentrations of the enzymes were estimated according to the procedure of Lee and Jayaram (22).

Synthetic DNA Substrates-- Oligonucleotides for the construction of the half-sites were synthesized in an Applied Biosystems model 380A DNA synthesizer using phosphoramidite chemistry (23) and purified as described previously (24). The sequence of the half-site DNA substrate was: 5'-aagcttgcgaagttcctatacttt/3'-acgcttcaaggatatgaaagatct with the Flp binding element written in bold letters. The sequence of the ligator strand was 5'-tttctagagaataggaacttcggg. The assembly of substrates containing a 5'-radiolabeled scissile strand and a 5'-cold phosphorylated uncleaved strand was performed as described by Knudsen et al. (25).

Strand Cleavage and Ligation by Flp-- To investigate the effect of CPT or NSC-314622 on DNA cleavage mediated by wild type Flp, ~0.5 pmol of enzyme was preincubated for 5 min at room temperature in a standard Flp reaction buffer (100 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 10% polyethylene glycol, 80 mM NaCl, 10 mM mercaptoethanol, and 2 mM EDTA) with or without added drugs as stated in the figure legends. Me2SO was added to a final concentration of 10% to control reactions to make them comparable with the samples containing drugs (which were applied as 10× stock solutions dissolved in 100% Me2SO). Subsequent to preincubation, DNA cleavage was initiated by the addition of 0.02 pmol of the radiolabeled half-site, and incubation was continued for 15 min at 30 °C in a 20-µl reaction volume.

To assay the effect of the drug on wild type Flp-mediated DNA ligation, active cleavage complexes were generated by incubating 0.5 pmol of the enzyme with 0.02 pmol of the half-site in 20 µl of the standard reaction buffer for 30 min at 30 °C. The active cleavage complexes were pretreated with indicated concentrations of drugs for 5 min as described above. Subsequently, ligation was initiated by the addition of 0.00625 pmol of ligator strand (unless otherwise stated), and incubation was continued in a 30-µl reaction volume for another 15 min at 30 °C. All reactions were terminated by the addition of SDS (0.1% final concentration) and were treated with proteinase K (100 µg/reaction for 1 h at 37 °C) prior to ethanol precipitation. The reaction products were fractionated by electrophoresis in 12% denaturing (5% bis-acrylamide) polyacrylamide gels, and the reaction products were visualized by phosphorimaging. Studies of the drug effects on Flp(Y343F)-mediated reactions were carried out as described above except that the wild type enzyme was replaced with 0.5 pmol of Flp(Y343F) plus 30 mM tyramine.

Quantification of Flp Reaction Products-- The amount of Flp-mediated cleavage and ligation was quantified on a model SF Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager by integrating the area under the curve for each radioactive band using ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics). The cleavage activity was calculated as C/(C + S), and the ligation activity was calculated as L/(L C), where C is the amount of cleavage product, S is the amount of substrate, and L is the amount of ligation product.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES

Flp-mediated DNA Cleavage and Ligation Are Inhibited by CPT and NSC-314622-- The sensitivity of Flp toward CPT and NSC-314622 in the cleavage and ligation steps of catalysis was investigated using a synthetic DNA "half-site" substrate containing a single Flp binding sequence (Fig. 1, B and D, right panels). This substrate supports cleavage, but the concomitant ligation is prevented because of 5'-phosphorylation of the noncleaved DNA strand and release of the short oligonucleotide containing the 5'-OH end. However, ligation of the cleavage product to free 5'-OH ends can be effected by adding excess ligator DNA strands that are able to form base pair with the noncleaved strand (25).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Inhibition of Flp-mediated cleavage and ligation by CPT and NSC-314622. A and B show the drug dose-response relationships of Flp (Wt)-mediated cleavage and ligation, respectively. The data points are the mean of three independent experiments. The NSC-314622 concentrations were 0.005, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, and 0.25 mM. The CPT concentrations were 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, and 2.0 mM. The gel picture (inset, A) is a representative example of the result obtained by incubating Flp with 0-0.25 mM NSC-314622 prior to adding the radiolabeled half-site substrate. S represents the uncleaved substrate, and C is the cleavage product containing a short 3'-linked Flp-derived protease-resistant peptide. The bands surrounding S represent cleavage products that are retarded in the gel because of partial protease digestion of Flp. The reactions are schematically represented in B and D, right panels. The substrate was composed of a 5'-radiolabeled 24-mer scissile strand hybridized to a 5'-phosphorylated 24-mer noncleaved strand. During cleavage, one Flp monomer activates the scissile phosphodiester bond, while another monomer donates the active site tyrosine for cleavage. The result is a dimeric complex with one monomer bound noncovalently to the DNA substrate and the other covalently linked to the 3'-phosphate end. The addition of ligator DNA containing a free 5'-OH end induces ligation with the concomitant release of the covalently bound Flp. C and D show the drug dose-response relationship of Flp(Y343F)-mediated cleavage and ligation, respectively. In these experiments, the cleavage nucleophile was supplied exogenously in the form of 30 mM tyramine. The right panel in D is a schematic illustration of the reactions. The only difference from the wild type reactions is that tyramine substitutes for the Flp monomer donating the catalytic tyrosine. Reactions incubated with NSC-314622 and CPT are represented by open and filled circles, respectively.

The cleavage assays were performed by incubating the enzyme with a radiolabeled half-site substrate in the presence of increasing concentrations of CPT or NSC-314622 and the products analyzed by electrophoresis in denaturing polyacrylamide gels followed by phosphorimaging (an example of a gel picture is shown in Fig. 1A, inset). The extent of cleavage was determined by densitometric scanning of the reaction products and plotted as a function of the drug concentration in the reaction mixture. Both drugs inhibited the cleavage reaction (Fig. 1A), NSC-314622 (open circles) being the more competent inhibitor causing a 50% reduction of cleavage at a concentration of 0.05 mM. In comparison, 1 mM CPT (filled circles) was required to reduce Flp-mediated cleavage by 50%. For the ligation assay, cleavage complexes generated by preincubation of Flp with the half-site substrate were incubated with a molar excess of the ligator DNA strands and increasing concentrations of the respective drug. The dose-response curves for the ligation reaction (Fig. 1B) demonstrated an inhibition pattern similar to the one observed for cleavage. An ~50% reduction of activity was observed in the presence of 0.05 mM NSC-314622 (open circles) or 1 mM CPT (filled circles), respectively. In comparison, topo I-mediated ligation is reduced by 50% in the presence of 1 µM CPT (26), whereas the inhibition efficiencies of NSC-31422 on topo I and Flp appear comparable (17).

The observed inhibition of Flp by CPT and NSC-31466 is, to the best of our knowledge, the first example of an enzyme, other than the cellular forms of eukaryotic topo I, being affected by these drugs. This result is in good accordance with a close mechanistic and structural relationship between the two enzymes. However, Flp differs from eukaryotic topo I in one respect. Whereas topo I is drug-resistant during cleavage (data not shown and Ref. 19), Flp is readily inhibited in this reaction. The inhibition is not the result of an adverse effect on Flp-DNA interaction, because gel retardation experiments showed that noncovalent DNA binding by Flp was unaffected by the presence of 1 mM CPT or NSC-314622 in the reaction mixture (data not shown). Thus, camptothecin most likely affects a precleavage Flp step subsequent to DNA binding or the cleavage chemistry itself. In this connection it is interesting to note that the topo I is active as a monomer, whereas it takes a dimer of Flp to be cleavage competent (27). One Flp monomer (bound adjacent to the cleavage site) provides the RHRW tetrad to activate the scissile phosphodiester bond, and the other monomer (bound distally) donates the tyrosine nucleophile for cleavage (28, 29). The sole function of the second monomer is to provide the nucleophile in the functional orientation. This monomer can be replaced by exogenously added tyramine in a Flp(Y343F)-mediated reaction (30). Cleavage by tyramine generates a 3'-phosphotyramine linkage, which serves as a substrate for DNA ligation mediated by a single Flp(Y343F) monomer. Consequently, Flp(Y343F) acts as a true monomer during both cleavage and ligation, resembling the monomeric action of eukaryotic topo I, which is highlighted by the ability of Flp(Y343F) to catalyze the relaxation of DNA supercoils in the presence of tyramine (8).

To elucidate drug interaction with a single Flp monomer, we investigated the effect of CPT and NSC-314622 on the Flp(Y343F)-mediated reactions assisted by tyramine (schematically represented in Fig. 1D, right panel). Cleavage was assayed by incubating Flp(Y343F) with the half-site substrate and 30 mM of tyramine in the presence of increasing concentrations of the drugs (Fig. 1C). The effect of NSC-314622 (open circles) on Flp(Y343F)-mediated cleavage was comparable with the effect on the wild type Flp reaction (compare Fig. 1, panels C and A). On the other hand, CPT (filled circles) was approximately 2-fold more efficient at inhibiting Flp(Y343F) than wild type Flp (0.5 mM CPT causing a 50% reduction of tyramine-assisted cleavage). Similar inhibition patterns were observed for the Flp(Y343F)-mediated ligation reaction (Fig. 1D). The drug concentrations for 50% reduction in activity were 0.05 and 0.5 mM for NSC-314622 and CPT, respectively.

The inhibition by the drugs of Flp(Y343F)-mediated reactions argues against their action being directed to the dimeric interface between Flp monomers. More likely, CPT and NSC-314622 interfere with Flp catalysis by interacting with the pro-active site (the active site that has to acquire the tyrosine nucleophile in trans to become cleavage competent) harbored by the Flp monomer. This mode of action would agree with what has previously been established for eukaryotic topo I (31). The difference between the two enzymes in drug sensitivity during cleavage may be explained by the catalytic pocket of Flp having a more open conformation than that of topo I. Such a conformation would be required to permit the entrance of the tyrosine nucleophile in trans from a second Flp monomer and could facilitate interaction with the active portion of the drug molecules. This notion is supported by the crystal structure of Flp showing that within a single monomer the active site tyrosine points away from the RHRW tetrad, leaving the catalytic pocket in an open conformation (9).

CPT and NSC-314622 Inhibit Flp Transesterification in a Competitive Manner-- In an attempt to verify the suspected drug interaction with the catalytic pocket of Flp, we tested whether inhibition by CPT and NSC-314622 was competitive with the cleavage and ligation nucleophiles. For this purpose, DNA cleavage and ligation were assayed in the presence of varying concentrations of substrates (the nucleophile for transesterification) and drugs relative to each other. To vary the concentration of the cleavage nucleophile without changing enzyme concentration, we utilized tyramine-assisted cleavage mediated by Flp(Y343F) of a half-site substrate. A range of tyramine concentrations (from 5 to 70 mM) was employed in the presence of different concentrations of either CPT (from 0 to 1 mM) or NSC-314622 (from 0 to 0.1 mM). The results are depicted as Lineweaver-Burk plots in Fig. 2, A and B. The mode of inhibition of ligation was investigated in a similar manner using the strand joining reaction in a cleaved half-site substrate as described above. Because the natural nucleophile during ligation is a 5'-OH end of DNA, it was possible to assay this step using the wild type enzyme. The concentrations of the ligator strand ranged from 0.005 to 1 pmol in the presence of 0-1 mM CPT or 0-0.1 mM NSC-314622. The Lineweaver-Burk plots of the data are shown in Fig. 2, C and D. The intercepts on the ordinates of the plots for both cleavage (Fig. 2, A and B) and ligation (Fig. 2, C and D) were nearly the same regardless of the concentrations of either CPT or NSC-314622. Thus, the inhibitions of cleavage and ligation were competitive in nature and could be overcome by a sufficiently high concentration of either tyramine or the ligator strand, respectively. We therefore believe that the sites of occupancy of the drugs and the incoming nucleophile (tyramine or the 5'-OH DNA end) are the same, partially overlapping or at least in close enough proximity to elicit mutual competition. Such a drug interaction mode with Flp is consistent with previously published results demonstrating that CPT inhibits topo I-mediated ligation in a competitive manner (31). Moreover, the similarity in the inhibition of Flp-mediated cleavage and ligation suggests that the two reactions are catalyzed by similar active site conformations. In both instances, the pro-active site of the Flp monomer orients the phosphodiester (the DNA phosphodiester or the phosphotyrosine bond formed by strand cleavage) so that it can be targeted by the attacking nucleophile supplied in trans (the active site tyrosine or the 5'-OH from the cleaved strand).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Inhibition by CPT or NSC-314622 of Flp-mediated cleavage and ligation is competitive. Flp(Y343F)-mediated cleavage by tyramine and Flp (Wt)-mediated ligation was assayed in the presence of varying concentrations of nucleophile (tyramine or ligator DNA) and drugs (CPT or NSC-314622) relative to each other. The data are represented as Lineweaver-Burk plots. Results of tyramine (5-70 mM)-assisted cleavage by Flp(Y343F) are shown in A and B. Reactions shown in A and B represent the effects of CPT and NSC-314622, respectively, at the indicated concentrations. The inhibitions of Flp-mediated ligation reactions by CPT and NSC-314622 are displayed in C and D, respectively.

Inhibition of Flp by CPT and NSC-314622 Is Reversible-- It is well documented that CPT interaction with topo I is transient and that the effect of high drug concentrations can be reversed by dilution (19). To further compare Flp and topo I with respect to drug interaction, we investigated whether inhibition of the Flp recombinase is also reversible upon drug dilution. Active cleavage complexes (obtained as described earlier) were split into three samples of 60 µl each and incubated for 5 min without added drug or in the presence of 2.0 mM CPT or 0.25 mM NSC-314622. At these drug concentrations DNA ligation was abolished (see Fig. 1). Each sample was then split into halves. To the first half of each sample, the ligator strand was added directly to a final concentration of 200 nM, and incubation was continued for 60 min. The other halves were diluted to a final volume of 1200 µl (drug concentrations diluted to 0.05 mM CPT or 0.006 mM NSC-314622) and then incubated with 200 nM ligator strand. The ligation results are depicted by a bar chart (Fig. 3). The almost complete inhibition by the drugs in the undiluted samples (Undiluted, compare white and gray bars with black bar) is in contrast with the nearly complete recovery of ligation activities upon drug dilution (Diluted, compare white and gray bars with black bar).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Inhibition of Flp by CPT and NSC-314622 is reversible. Active Flp cleavage complexes were preincubated in the absence of drug or in the presence of 2 mM CPT or 0.25 mM NSC-314622, respectively. The ligation activity of each preincubation mixture with or without 20× dilution was assayed in the presence of 200 nM ligator DNA strand (as described under "Results"). The bars on the left and right represent the undiluted and diluted reaction sets, respectively. Within each set, the bars from left to right indicate controls without any drug (black-square), reactions containing CPT (), and reactions containing NSC-314622 (), respectively.



    DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES

In the present study we have demonstrated that CPT and NSC-314622 inhibit Flp recombinase by blocking the active site from the incoming nucleophile for strand cleavage or ligation. The fact that two structurally distinct topo I-directed drugs also inhibit Flp recombinase argues that their interaction with Flp is unlikely to be mere coincidence. Rather, the active site of Flp may share sufficient structural similarities to that of eukaryotic topo I to be able to bind the two drugs specifically, although Flp differs from topo I regarding drug affinity. Flp is less sensitive than topo I toward CPT (26), but the effect of NSC-314622 on the two enzymes appears comparable (17). Drug interaction with topo I is very specific as revealed by several single amino acid mutations conferring drug resistance to the enzyme (32-36) and by topo I from vaccinia virus being drug-resistant because of a single amino acid difference compared with the cellular forms of topo I (37, 38). The extent of structural similarities and differences between Flp and human topo I seen in recently published crystal structures is comparable with those between Flp and other members of the lambda -Int recombinase family (9, 12, 13). Our data are consistent with the notion that at least some recombinases of the Int family, including Flp, may have evolved in parallel with the type IB topoisomerases from a common, and possibly drug-sensitive, ancestral topoisomerase.

Studies with eukaryotic topo I have shown that CPT interacts with the enzyme only after formation of the covalent cleavage intermediate (19) and that the inhibitory effect is enhanced by a G-positioned 3' to the cleavage site (39-41). Moreover, affinity labeling experiments have indicated that the drug interacts with both the enzyme and the DNA within the cleavage complexes (18, 20). It has therefore been proposed that the drug forms a ternary complex with the cleavage intermediate, with the base 3' to the cleavage site playing a direct role in drug binding (18, 20). Our results with Flp can be reconciled with the topo I data if drug accessibility is facilitated by an open post-cleavage conformation of the topo I active site. This transition may be required for the entry of the DNA nucleophile (5'-OH) for the strand joining reaction. Because of the trans cleavage mechanism of Flp, the pro-active site of the Flp monomer has an inherent open conformation (9), allowing drug binding both in the pre- and post-cleavage states of the enzyme. Thus, unlike topo I, Flp is drug sensitive in both the strand cleavage and ligation steps. Although the conformation of the catalytic pocket of the enzyme may determine the initial interaction with the drug, this interaction could be further reinforced by additional drug-DNA interactions. Consistent with such a mechanism, the presence of DNA downstream to the cleavage site in topo I-DNA complexes has been found not to be a prerequisite for, even though it stimulates, the action of camptothecins (26).

Our findings suggest that Flp and other related recombinases that utilize the type IB topoisomerase mechanism can be exploited successfully to study the mechanism of action of an important class of anti-tumor drugs.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We are grateful to Dr. Yves Pommier (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) for kindly providing the NSC-314622 for these studies and to Kirsten Andersen for skillful technical assistance.


    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by the Danish Cancer Society (Grants 9710032, 9910012, and 9910013), the Alfred Benzon Foundation, the Danish Research Councils, the Biotechnological Research Program (Biotec III), and the Danish Center for Molecular Gerontology. Support for the Jayaram laboratory was provided by the Robert F. Welch Foundation, The Texas Board for Coordinating Higher Education, and the National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Present address: Dept. of Genetics and Development, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 701 West 168th St., New York, NY 10032.

Present address: Clare Hall Laboratories, Blanche Lane, South Mimms, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire EN6 3LD, United Kingdom.

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: +45-89422703; Fax: +45-89422612; E-mail: brk@mbio.aau.dk.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 10, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.C000901200


    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: Int, integrase; CPT, camptothecin; NSC-314622, 5,6-dihydro-5,11-diketo-2,3-dimethoxy-6-methyl-8,9- methyllenedioxy-11H-indenol(1,2-c)isoquinoline; topo I, topoisomerase I.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES


1. Jayaram, M. (1994) Trends Biochem. Sci. 19, 78-82[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Sadowski, P. D. (1995) Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol. 51, 53-91[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Gupta, M., Fujimori, A., and Pommier, Y. (1995) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1262, 1-14[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Kikuchi, Y., and Nash, H. A. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 76, 3760-3764[Abstract]
5. Abremski, K., Wierzbicki, A., Frommer, B., and Hoess, R. H. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 391-396[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Shuman, S. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 10104-10108[Abstract]
7. Sekiguchi, J., Seeman, N. C., and Shuman, S. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 785-789[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Xu, C. J., Grainge, I., Lee, J., Harshey, R. M., and Jayaram, M. (1998) Mol. Cell 1, 729-739[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Chen, Y., Narendra, U., Iype, L. E., Cox, M. M., and Rice, P. A. (2000) Mol. Cell 6, 885-897[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Guo, F., Gopaul, D. N., and van Duyne, G. D. (1997) Nature 389, 40-46[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Cheng, C., Kussie, P., Pavletich, N., and Shuman, S. (1998) Cell 92, 841-850[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Redinbo, M. R., Stewart, L., Kuhn, P., Champoux, J. J., and Hol, W. G. (1998) Science 279, 1504-1513[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Stewart, L., Redinbo, M. R., Qiu, X., Hol, W. G., and Champoux, J. J. (1998) Science 279, 1534-1541[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Redinbo, M. R., Champoux, J. J., and Hol, W. G. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 6832-6840[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Pommier, Y., Pourquier, P., Fan, Y., and Strumberg, D. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1400, 83-105[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Christiansen, K., and Westergaard, O. (1996) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 803, 50-59[Abstract]
17. Kohlhagen, G., Paull, K. D., Cushman, M., Nagafuji, P., and Pommier, Y. (1998) Mol. Pharmacol. 54, 50-58[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Hertzberg, R. P., Busby, R. W., Caranfa, M. J., Holden, K. G., Johnson, R. K., Hecht, S. M., and Kingsbury, W. D. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 19287-19295[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Hertzberg, R. P., Caranfa, M. J., and Hecht, S. M. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 4629-4638[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Pommier, Y., Kohlhagen, G., Kohn, K. W., Leteurtre, F., Wani, M. C., and Wall, M. E. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 8861-8865[Abstract]
21. Prasad, P. V., Young, L. J., and Jayaram, M. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 2189-2193[Abstract]
22. Lee, J., and Jayaram, M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 23203-23211[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Caruthers, M. H., Beaucage, S. L., Becker, C., Efcavitch, J. W., Fisher, E. F., Galluppi, G., Goldman, R., deHaseth, P., Matteucci, M., McBride, L., et al.. (1983) Gene Amplif. Anal. 3, 1-26
24. Christiansen, K., Svejstrup, A. B., Andersen, A. H., and Westergaard, O. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 9690-9701[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Knudsen, B. R., Dahlstrom, K., Westergaard, O., and Jayaram, M. (1997) J. Mol. Biol. 266, 93-107[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Lisby, M., Krogh, B. O., Boege, F., Westergaard, O., and Knudsen, B. R. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 10815-10827[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Chen, J. W., Evans, B. R., Yang, S. H., Araki, H., Oshima, Y., and Jayaram, M. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 3757-3765[Abstract]
28. Chen, J. W., Lee, J., and Jayaram, M. (1992) Cell 69, 647-658[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Lee, J., Jayaram, M., and Grainge, I. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 784-791[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Lee, J., and Jayaram, M. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 17564-17570[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Straub, T., Boesenberg, C., Gekeler, V., and Boege, F. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 10777-10783[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Benedetti, P., Fiorani, P., Capuani, L., and Wang, J. C. (1993) Cancer Res. 53, 4343-4348[Abstract]
33. Li, X. G., Haluska, P., Jr., Hsiang, Y. H., Bharti, A., Kufe, D. W., and Rubin, E. H. (1996) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 803, 111-127[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Pond, C. D., Li, X. G., Rubin, E. H., and Barrows, L. R. (1999) Anticancer Drugs 10, 647-653[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Tanizawa, A., Beitrand, R., Kohlhagen, G., Tabuchi, A., Jenkins, J., and Pommier, Y. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 25463-25468[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Wang, L. F., Ting, C. Y., Lo, C. K., Su, J. S., Mickley, L. A., Fojo, A. T., Whang-Peng, J., and Hwang, J. (1997) Cancer Res. 57, 1516-1522[Abstract]
37. Shuman, S., Golder, M., and Moss, B. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 16401-16407[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Gupta, M., Zhu, C. X., and Tse-Dinh, Y. C. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 24177-24180[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Jaxel, C., Capranico, G., Kerrigan, D., Kohn, K. W., and Pommier, Y. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 20418-20423[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Kjeldsen, E., Mollerup, S., Thomsen, B., Bonven, B. J., Bolund, L., and Westergaard, O. (1988) J. Mol. Biol. 202, 333-342[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Thomsen, B., Mollerup, S., Bonven, B. J., Frank, R., Blocker, H., Nielsen, O. F., and Westergaard, O. (1987) EMBO J. 6, 1817-1823[Abstract]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.



This Article
Abstract
Full Text (PDF)
All Versions of this Article:
276/10/6993    most recent
C000901200v1
Purchase Article
View Shopping Cart
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Citation Map
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Copyright Permissions
Google Scholar
Articles by Frøhlich, R. F.
Articles by Knudsen, B. R.
Articles citing this Article
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Frøhlich, R. F.
Articles by Knudsen, B. R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.