Stimulation of M3 Muscarinic Receptors Induces Phosphorylation of the Cdc42 Effector Activated Cdc42Hs-associated Kinase-1 via a Fyn Tyrosine Kinase Signaling Pathway*

Daniel A. LinsemanDagger §, Kim A. Heidenreich, and Stephen K. FisherDagger

From the Dagger  Department of Pharmacology and Neuroscience Laboratory, Mental Health Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104-1687 and the  Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, and the Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, Colorado 80220

Received for publication, July 28, 2000, and in revised form, October 17, 2000



    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The tyrosine kinase, activated Cdc42Hs-associated kinase-1 (ACK-1), is a specific effector of the Rho family GTPase Cdc42. GTP-bound Cdc42 has been shown to facilitate neurite outgrowth elicited by activation of muscarinic cholinergic receptors (mAChRs). Because tyrosine kinase activity is a requirement for neuritogenesis in several cell systems, we investigated whether endogenous mAChRs (principally of the M3 subtype) expressed in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells would signal to ACK-1. Incubation of cells with the cholinergic agonist oxotremorine-M (Oxo-M) induced an approximately 6-fold increase in the tyrosine phosphorylation of ACK-1 which was inhibited by atropine. ACK-1 phosphorylation was blocked by Clostridium difficile toxin B, an inhibitor of Rho family GTPases. In contrast, disruption of the actin cytoskeleton with cytochalasin D stimulated ACK-1 phosphorylation, and moreover, addition of Oxo-M to cells preincubated with this agent elicited a further increase in phosphorylation, indicating that an intact cytoskeleton is not required for mAChR signaling to ACK-1. Although stimulation of M3 mAChRs induces both an increase in intracellular Ca2+ and activation of protein kinase C (PKC), neither of these second messenger pathways was required for receptor-stimulated ACK-1 phosphorylation. Instead, inhibition of PKC resulted in a 2-fold increase in Oxo-M-stimulated ACK-1 phosphorylation, whereas acute activation of PKC with phorbol ester decreased ACK-1 phosphorylation. The agonist-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of ACK-1 was blocked by inhibitors of Src family kinases, and ACK-1 was coprecipitated with Fyn (but not Src) in an agonist-dependent manner. Finally, scrape loading cells with glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins of either the Fyn-SH2 or Fyn-SH3 domain significantly attenuated mAChR-stimulated ACK-1 tyrosine phosphorylation. The data are the first to show phosphorylation of ACK-1 after stimulation of a receptor coupled to neurite outgrowth and indicate that a Rho family GTPase (i.e. Cdc42) and Fyn are essential upstream elements of this signaling pathway.



    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Synaptic plasticity plays a critical role in the development of the central nervous system and in mediating the processes of learning and memory. The phenomena of long term potentiation and long term depression are considered in vitro models of the latter (1). Previous studies have demonstrated a requirement for tyrosine kinase activity in mediating both long term potentiation in the hippocampus and long term depression in the cerebellum (2, 3). Furthermore, tyrosine kinase activity has also been shown to play a prominent role in facilitating neurite outgrowth in several in vitro models (4, 5). Currently, ~100 protein tyrosine kinases have been identified (6). These enzymes can be categorized into two distinct classes, receptors with intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity and nonreceptor tyrosine kinases. Examples of receptor tyrosine kinases include classical growth factor receptors such as the receptor for nerve growth factor (7). The nonreceptor tyrosine kinases consist of approximately 10 families including two related families, the activated Cdc42Hs-associated kinase (ACK)1family and the focal adhesion kinase (FAK) family (8). Nonreceptor tyrosine kinases of the ACK and FAK families are highly expressed in the brain (9-12) and have been postulated to regulate synaptic changes in the central nervous system (13, 14).

ACK-1 is one of two known members of the ACK family and was originally cloned from a human hippocampal cDNA library (9). ACK-1 is a specific downstream effector of the Rho family small molecular weight GTPase Cdc42. In contrast to many effectors that also act as GTPase-activating proteins for their partner G proteins, the association of ACK-1 with GTP-bound Cdc42 has been shown to inhibit both the intrinsic and GTPase-activating protein-stimulated GTPase activity of Cdc42, suggesting that this interaction may sustain Cdc42 in a GTP-bound (active) state (9). Active Cdc42 promotes the formation of filopodial extensions and actin microspikes (15, 16). These changes in actin cytoskeletal structure are mediated via activation of other Cdc42 effectors, such as the p21-activated kinases (17, 18) and the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome proteins (19, 20). In neuronal cells, Rho family GTPases regulate changes in growth cone morphology (21, 22). In particular, Rac and Cdc42 facilitate neurite outgrowth, whereas Rho induces neurite retraction and growth cone collapse (23-25). Although ACK family proteins have been postulated to play a role in growth cone remodeling (14), the activation of this class of nonreceptor tyrosine kinase has not yet been investigated in a neuronal cell model.

Cholinergic transmission is a critical element involved in the maintenance of cognitive functions in the central nervous system such as learning and memory (26). For example, deficits in muscarinic cholinergic receptor (mAChR) signaling contribute to the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease and other types of age-related dementia (27-29). The SH-SY5Y cell line is a human neuroblastoma derived as a subclone from the parental SK-N-SH line (30, 31). SH-SY5Y cells express a high density of mAChRs, principally of the M3 subtype (32, 33), which are coupled to the phospholipase C-dependent production of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and sn-1,2-diacylglycerol (34, 35). These second messenger molecules lead to an increase in intracellular Ca2+ and activation of protein kinase C (PKC), respectively. Stimulation of mAChRs on SH-SY5Y cells has been shown to elicit morphological changes characteristic of neurite outgrowth (36, 37) and induces a marked increase in the tyrosine phosphorylation of the nonreceptor tyrosine kinase FAK (38). Given that Cdc42 has been shown to regulate mAChR-mediated growth cone remodeling (23), we investigated whether mAChR stimulation in SH-SY5Y cells couples to activation of the Cdc42 effector ACK-1.

The results demonstrate that agonist occupancy of mAChRs on SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells elicits an enhanced tyrosine phosphorylation of ACK-1 which is dependent on Cdc42 function, Fyn tyrosine kinase activity, and an interaction between ACK-1 and Fyn. The last may require both the Fyn-SH2 and Fyn-SH3 domains. The results are the first to show a receptor-mediated activation of ACK-1 in a neuronal cell system and support a role for this nonreceptor tyrosine kinase in signaling during growth cone remodeling.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), bisindolylmaleimide I (GF 109203X), PP1, PP2, PP3, thapsigargin, and cytochalasin D were obtained from Calbiochem. Atropine and mecamylamine were from Sigma. Oxotremorine-M (Oxo-M) was purchased from Research Biochemicals International (Natick, MA). Clostridium difficile toxin B was generously provided by Dr. Klaus Aktories and Dr. Fred Hofmann (Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Freiburg, Germany). All other chemicals were of reagent grade. 32Pi (10 mCi/ml), reagents for enhanced chemiluminescence, and peroxidase-conjugated sheep anti-mouse IgG were purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Monoclonal antibodies to phosphotyrosine Tyr(P) and myristoylated alanine-rich protein kinase C substrate (MARCKS) were obtained from Upstate Biotechnology Inc. (Lake Placid, NY). Polyclonal antibodies to FAK and ACK-1, blocking peptide for ACK-1, monoclonal antibodies to Src, Fyn, and glutathione S-transferase (GST), agarose-conjugated protein A/G, and purified GST, GST-Fyn-SH2, and GST-Fyn-SH3 were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Tissue culture supplies were purchased from Corning Glass Works (Corning, NY) and Sarstedt (Newton, NC). Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium was from Life Technologies, Inc. Fetal calf serum was from Summit Biotechnology (Ft. Collins, CO). Human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells were obtained from Dr. June Biedler (Sloan-Kettering Institute, New York).

Cell Culture Conditions-- Human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells (passages 68-78) were routinely grown in 75-cm2 tissue culture flasks containing 20 ml of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. Cells were grown for 7-14 days at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere consisting of 90% air and 10% CO2. Cells were subcultured into 35-mm-diameter, six-well culture plates (Becton Dickinson Labware, Lincoln Park, NJ) for 2-5 days before treatment. All experiments were performed on cells that had reached confluence.

Incubation Conditions and Immunoprecipitations-- After removal of the plating medium, confluent cultures of SH-SY5Y cells were washed once with 2 ml of prewarmed (37 °C) treatment buffer consisting of 138 mM NaCl, 6 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM Na2HPO4, 5 mM NaHCO3, 5.5 mM glucose, and 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) and allowed to equilibrate at 37 °C in 1 ml of treatment buffer for 20 min. During the equilibration period cells were preincubated with inhibitors as described in this paper. In some experiments, cells were preincubated for 24 h in culture medium containing toxin B prior to agonist exposure, as described previously (37). Cells were then incubated for the specified duration at 37 °C with either buffer or 1 mM Oxo-M. After incubation, the buffer was aspirated, and the cells were rinsed once with 2 ml of ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4). Cells were then incubated on ice and scraped into lysis buffer (200 µl/well) containing 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 1% Triton X-100, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 5 mM beta -glycerophosphate, 30 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 100 µM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and 10 µg/ml leupeptin. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 6,000 × g for 3 min, and the protein concentration of the supernatant was determined using a commercially available protein assay kit (Pierce Chemical Co.). Aliquots (~350 µg) of supernatant protein were diluted to a final volume of 500 µl with lysis buffer and transferred to tubes containing either 2 µg of polyclonal anti-ACK-1 or 2 µg of polyclonal anti-FAK. In some experiments, varying amounts of the ACK-1 blocking peptide were included during immunoprecipitation. Samples were then incubated with mixing for 16-20 h at 4 °C. 25 µl of agarose-conjugated protein A/G was added for an additional 4 h with mixing. Immune complexes were pelleted by centrifugation and washed three times with ice-cold lysis buffer. The final agarose pellet was resuspended in an equal volume of 2 × SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) sample buffer, boiled for 5 min, and electrophoresed through 7.5% polyacrylamide gels. Proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA) and processed for immunoblot analysis.

Coprecipitation of Src Family Kinases and ACK-1-- Cells were incubated for 5 min with either buffer or Oxo-M and lysed as described above. Lysates were then immunoprecipitated with 2 µg of either polyclonal anti-ACK-1 or monoclonal anti-Src or anti-Fyn. Immune complexes were resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF, and processed for immunoblot analysis.

Immunoblot Analysis-- Nonspecific binding sites were blocked in PBS (pH 7.4) containing 0.1% Tween 20 (PBS-T) and 1% bovine serum albumin for 1 h at room temperature. Primary monoclonal antibodies were diluted in blocking solution (final concentration of 0.5-1.0 µg/ml) and incubated with the membranes for 1 h. Excess primary antibody was removed by washing the membranes three times in PBS-T. The blots were then incubated in peroxidase-conjugated, anti-mouse secondary antibody diluted in PBS-T (1:10,000) for 1 h and subsequently washed three times in PBS-T. Immunoreactive proteins were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence. In some experiments, membranes were reprobed after stripping in 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 2% SDS, and 100 mM beta -mercaptoethanol for 30 min at 52 °C. The blots were rinsed twice in PBS-T and processed as above with a different primary antibody. Autoluminograms shown are representative of two to four independent experiments. Quantitative analysis of autoluminograms was performed by computer-assisted imaging densitometry (MCID; Imaging Research, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada).

32P Labeling of ACK-1 and MARCKS-- Cells were incubated to isotopic equilibrium at 37 °C in 1 ml of phosphate-free treatment buffer containing 1 mCi/ml 32Pi for 4 h. The labeling solution was aspirated, and unincorporated 32Pi was removed by washing three times with 2 ml of the same buffer. The cells were then incubated with either vehicle, Oxo-M or PMA, as described in the legend to Fig. 4, and either ACK-1 or MARCKS was immunoprecipitated from cell lysates. Immune complexes were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes. 32P-Labeled proteins were visualized by PhosphorImager analysis (Cyclone Storage Phosphor System; Packard Instrument Company, Meriden, CT). Membranes containing ACK-1 immunoprecipitates were subsequently immunoblotted for Tyr(P) as described above.

Scrape Loading with GST Fusion Proteins-- Either GST alone or GST fusion proteins (Fyn-SH2 or Fyn-SH3) were scrape loaded into cells at a concentration of 20 µg/ml in scrape-loading buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0), 114 mM KCl, 15 mM NaCl, and 5.5 mM MgCl2 (39). Scrape-loaded cells were incubated for 30 min in the presence of the fusion proteins, and then the cells were pelleted, resuspended in serum-free medium, and seeded into 35-mm culture dishes. After further incubation at 37 °C in 10% CO2 for 3 h, the cells had reattached and were incubated with either buffer or Oxo-M for 5 min. ACK-1 immune complexes were isolated and probed for Tyr(P). The post-ACK-1 immunoprecipitate lysates were also resolved by SDS-PAGE and were probed for GST to estimate the efficiency of scrape loading.

Data Analysis-- Results shown represent the means ± S.E. for the number (n) of independent experiments performed. Statistical differences between the means of unpaired sets of data were evaluated using Student's two-tailed t tests.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Agonist Occupancy of mAChRs Enhances the Tyrosine Phosphorylation of ACK-1-- Incubation of SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells with the cholinergic agonist Oxo-M elicited a marked increase in the tyrosine phosphorylation of ACK-1 (6.2 ± 0.7-fold increase over basal, n = 6, p < 0.001, Fig. 1A, first lane versus second lane). Immunoprecipitation of ACK-1 was competitively antagonized by coincubation with a blocking peptide that mimicked the antigenic site on ACK-1 (Fig. 1A). Agonist-stimulated ACK-1 phosphorylation was blocked by preincubation with the muscarinic selective antagonist, atropine, but was unaffected by the nicotinic selective antagonist, mecamylamine (Fig. 1B). The increased tyrosine phosphorylation of ACK-1 elicited by Oxo-M was time- and dose-dependent. The agonist-stimulated phosphorylation of ACK-1 was rapid and persistent, increasing within 1 min of agonist exposure, peaking at 5-10 min, and remaining elevated above the basal level for at least 1 h (Fig. 1C). Furthermore, Oxo-M induced the tyrosine phosphorylation of ACK-1 with an EC50 of ~100 µM (Fig. 1D, upper panel). The addition of agonist had no effect on the immunoprecipitation efficiency of ACK-1 (Fig. 1D, lower panel).



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Stimulation of mAChRs on SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells enhances the tyrosine phosphorylation of ACK-1. A, confluent cultures of SH-SY5Y cells were incubated for 5 min with either buffer alone or 1 mM Oxo-M. Triton X-100-soluble extracts were immunoprecipitated (IP) with 2 µg of polyclonal anti-ACK-1 in either the absence or presence of varying concentrations of ACK-1-blocking peptide. Immune complexes were resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF, and immunoblotted (IB) for Tyr(P) (PTyr), as described under "Experimental Procedures." B, SH-SY5Y cells were preincubated for 10 min with either 10 µM atropine (ATR) or 10 µM mecamylamine (MEC) prior to incubation with 1 mM Oxo-M for a further 5 min. ACK-1 immune complexes were probed for Tyr(P). C, SH-SY5Y cells were incubated with 1 mM Oxo-M for varying times, and ACK-1 immune complexes were probed for Tyr(P). D, SH-SY5Y cells were incubated with varying concentrations of Oxo-M for 5 min, and ACK-1 immune complexes were blotted for Tyr(P) (upper panel) or ACK-1 (lower panel).

mAChR-stimulated ACK-1 Tyrosine Phosphorylation Is Dependent on Rho Family GTPase Activity but Not on an Intact Actin Cytoskeleton-- ACK-1 has been shown to interact specifically with the Rho family GTPase Cdc42 (9). To determine whether the mAChR-induced increase in ACK-1 tyrosine phosphorylation was dependent on Cdc42 activity, cells were preincubated with C. difficile toxin B. Toxin B is a monoglucosyltransferase that selectively inhibits the function of Rho family GTPases (40). After 24 h of incubation with toxin B, the subsequent C3 exoenzyme-catalyzed ADP-ribosylation of Rho proteins in SH-SY5Y cell lysates is significantly decreased, a result indicating that toxin B efficiently enters intact SH-SY5Y cells and inhibits Rho family GTPases in these cells (37). Moreover, SH-SY5Y cells become rounded, and a marked disruption of the actin cytoskeleton is observed after incubation with toxin B (37). The latter morphology is characteristic of cells in which Rho family GTPase function has been compromised (40). Preincubation with toxin B essentially abolished the agonist-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of ACK-1 (Fig. 2A), a result consistent with a requirement for Cdc42 function in signaling from the M3 mAChR to ACK-1.



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Differential effects of C. difficile toxin B and cytochalasin D on the tyrosine phosphorylation of ACK-1. A, confluent cultures of SH-SY5Y cells were preincubated for 24 h with medium containing either vehicle (0.1% bovine serum albumin in PBS) or 200 pg/ml toxin B. Cells were then incubated with either buffer alone or 1 mM Oxo-M for 5 min. ACK-1 immune complexes were resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF, and probed for Tyr(P) (PTyr), as described under "Experimental Procedures." B, SH-SY5Y cells were preincubated for 30 min with either vehicle (0.2% ethanol) or 1 µM cytochalasin D (Cyto D). Cells were then incubated for a further 5 min with either buffer alone or containing 1 mM Oxo-M. ACK-1 (upper panel) or FAK (lower panel) immune complexes were immunoblotted for Tyr(P). C, SH-SY5Y cells were preincubated for 24 h with medium containing either vehicle or 200 pg/ml toxin B. Cells were then incubated for a further 30 min with either vehicle or 1 µM Cyto D. ACK-1 immune complexes were isolated and probed for Tyr(P). IP, immunoprecipitated; IB, immunoblotted.

The ACK family of nonreceptor tyrosine kinases (9, 12) shows some homology to the FAK family, which includes two principal members, FAK and PYK-2 (11, 41). Stimulation of an enhanced tyrosine phosphorylation status of either FAK or PYK-2 requires an intact actin cytoskeleton (39, 42). Therefore, we analyzed the effects of the actin cytoskeleton-destabilizing agent cytochalasin D on mAChR-stimulated ACK-1 tyrosine phosphorylation. After a 30-min preincubation with cytochalasin D, SH-SY5Y cells displayed a significant disruption of actin stress fibers (results not shown). As documented previously (38), cytochalasin D pretreatment suppressed the basal tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK and completely inhibited the mAChR-induced increase in FAK phosphorylation (Fig. 2B, lower panel). In contrast, the basal tyrosine phosphorylation of ACK-1 was increased dramatically after incubation with cytochalasin D, and the agonist-induced increase in ACK-1 phosphorylation was sustained after disruption of the cytoskeleton (Fig. 2B, upper panel). Interestingly, the ability of cytochalasin D to enhance the tyrosine phosphorylation of ACK-1 was blunted significantly by preincubation with toxin B (Fig. 2C). Thus, an intact actin cytoskeleton is not required for mAChR signaling to ACK-1, and moreover, disruption of the actin cytoskeleton promotes ACK-1 phosphorylation via a mechanism involving Rho family GTPase activity.

Identification of a PKC-dependent Negative Feedback Loop That Limits mAChR Signaling to ACK-1-- Agonist occupancy of M3 mAChRs leads to the phospholipase C-dependent generation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and sn-1,2-diacylglycerol which, in turn, increase intracellular Ca2+ and activate PKC, respectively. Given that increases in intracellular Ca2+ and/or PKC activity can elicit an increased tyrosine phosphorylation of either PYK-2 or FAK (42, 43), the potential involvement of these second messengers in mAChR signaling to ACK-1 was investigated. First, the effects of depletion of intracellular Ca2+ stores on agonist-induced ACK-1 phosphorylation were assessed. As described previously (44), a 30-min preincubation of SH-SY5Y cells with 1 µM thapsigargin completely abolished the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate-mediated increase in intracellular Ca2+ observed after mAChR stimulation. However, thapsigargin pretreatment did not have a statistically significant effect on agonist-induced ACK-1 phosphorylation (690 ± 296% increase in control versus 426 ± 194% increase in thapsigargin-treated, n = 4, p = 0.48, data not shown). This result suggests that agonist-induced Ca2+ release does not play a significant role in mAChR signaling to ACK-1.

Next, we evaluated the effects of agents that modulate PKC activity on mAChR-stimulated ACK-1 tyrosine phosphorylation. Preincubation with the PKC inhibitor bisindolylmaleimide I, resulted in a statistically significant 2-fold increase in the mAChR-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of ACK-1 (Fig. 3, A and B). In contrast, activation of PKC, via an acute preincubation with phorbol ester, significantly inhibited agonist-stimulated ACK-1 tyrosine phosphorylation by ~50% (Fig. 3, A and B). This latter inhibitory effect of PMA on ACK-1 tyrosine phosphorylation was prevented by preincubation with the PKC inhibitor bisindolylmaleimide I (Fig. 3, A and B). These data indicate that, in general, PKC activity is inhibitory for ACK-1 tyrosine phosphorylation, and more specifically, receptor-mediated PKC activity limits the ability of the mAChR to stimulate ACK-1 tyrosine phosphorylation. To determine whether the inhibitory effects of PKC on ACK-1 tyrosine phosphorylation were mediated via direct serine or threonine phosphorylation of ACK-1 on some inhibitory site(s), the potential of PMA to increase 32P incorporation into ACK-1 was assessed in 32P-labeled SH-SY5Y cells. Incubation of 32P-prelabeled cells with Oxo-M induced an increase in the tyrosine phosphorylation of ACK-1 (Fig. 4A) and a corresponding increase in 32P incorporation into ACK-1 (Fig. 4B). In contrast, the addition of PMA resulted in a decrease in the basal tyrosine phosphorylation of ACK-1 (Fig. 4A, see also Fig. 3A, first lane versus fifth lane) with no detectable increase in 32P incorporation into ACK-1 (Fig. 4B). Under the latter conditions, incubation with PMA induced phosphorylation of the PKC substrate MARCKS in SH-SY5Y cells as indicated by the increase in 32P incorporation into this protein (Fig. 4C). Thus, activation of PKC blunts tyrosine phosphorylation of ACK-1 without inducing a corresponding increase in either serine or threonine phosphorylation of ACK-1.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   PKC activity blunts mAChR signaling to ACK-1. A, confluent cultures of SH-SY5Y cells were preincubated for 30 min with vehicle (VEH, 0.2% dimethyl sulfoxide), 5 µM bisindolylmaleimide I (GF), or 100 nM PMA. Alternatively, some cells were preincubated for 30 min with bisindolylmaleimide I prior to a further 30-min incubation with PMA. The cells were then incubated for a further 5 min with either buffer alone or buffer containing 1 mM Oxo-M. ACK-1 immune complexes were then immunoblotted for Tyr(P) (PTyr). B, densitometric analysis of the effects of bisindolylmaleimide I and PMA on Oxo-M-induced ACK-1 tyrosine phosphorylation. The results are expressed as a percentage of the net agonist-induced increase in ACK-1 tyrosine phosphorylation observed in vehicle-pretreated cells and represent the means ± S.E. of four independent experiments. Oxo-M increased the tyrosine phosphorylation of ACK-1 in vehicle-pretreated cells from 0.04 ± 0.02 O.D. units to 0.22 ± 0.06 O.D. units. The asterisks indicate a significant difference from the vehicle-pretreated control (p < 0.05). IP, immunoprecipitated; IB, immunoblotted.



View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Activation of PKC does not induce phosphorylation of ACK-1 in vivo. Confluent cultures of SH-SY5Y cells were labeled to isotopic equilibrium with 32Pi. Unincorporated label was removed by washing, and cells were incubated either for 5 min with 1 mM Oxo-M or for 30 min with either vehicle (VEH, 0.2% dimethyl sulfoxide) or 100 nM PMA. Cell lysates were then immunoprecipitated with either polyclonal anti-ACK-1 (A, B) or monoclonal anti-MARCKS (C), as described under "Experimental Procedures." Immune complexes were resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF, and[32P]-ACK-1 (B) or [32P]-MARCKS (C) was detected by PhosphorImager analysis. Membranes containing ACK-1 were subsequently immunoblotted for Tyr(P) (PTyr) (A). The data shown are representative of two separate experiments that produced similar results. IP, immunoprecipitated; IB, immunoblotted.

Requirement for Fyn Tyrosine Kinase in the mAChR-induced Phosphorylation of ACK-1-- Previous studies have demonstrated that FAK and PYK-2 each physically interacts with Src family kinases, and both are prominent substrates for this class of tyrosine kinase (45-48). Similarly, preincubation of SH-SY5Y cells with the Src family kinase inhibitor PP1 significantly attenuated the mAChR-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of ACK-1 (Fig. 5A). The inhibitory effects of PP1 were maximal at 10 µM, a concentration that essentially abolished Oxo-M-induced ACK-1 phosphorylation. In addition, a second Src family kinase inhibitor, PP2, also blocked agonist-induced ACK-1 tyrosine phosphorylation, whereas a negative control compound, PP3, had no effect (Fig. 5B). Moreover, Fyn tyrosine kinase, but not Src, was detected in ACK-1 immunoprecipitates obtained from lysates of agonist-stimulated SH-SY5Y cells (Fig. 6, first versus second lane of each panel). In contrast, tyrosine-phosphorylated ACK-1 was not detectable in Fyn immunoprecipitates isolated from agonist-stimulated cells (Fig. 6, upper panel, fifth versus sixth lane).



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Inhibition of Src family kinase activity blocks mAChR-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of ACK-1. A, confluent cultures of SH-SY5Y cells were preincubated with varying concentrations of PP1 for 15 min prior to a further 5-min incubation with either buffer alone or 1 mM Oxo-M. ACK-1 immune complexes were resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF, and immunoblotted for Tyr(P) (PTyr). B, SH-SY5Y cells were preincubated for 15 min with either vehicle (VEH, 0.2% dimethyl sulfoxide) or 10 µM PP1, PP2, or PP3 prior to the addition of Oxo-M for a further 5 min. ACK-1 immune complexes were probed for Tyr(P). IP, immunoprecipitation; IB, immunoblotted.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Coprecipitation of ACK-1 and Fyn after mAChR stimulation. Confluent cultures of SH-SY5Y cells were incubated for 5 min with either buffer alone or buffer containing 1 mM Oxo-M. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with either polyclonal anti-ACK-1 or monoclonal anti-Src or anti-Fyn as shown. Immune complexes were resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF, and sequentially immunoblotted (IB) for Tyr(P) (PTyr), Src, and Fyn. The blots shown are representative of results obtained in three independent experiments.

The monoclonal antibody to Fyn used in the previous experiments recognizes an epitope within the Fyn-SH2 and/or SH3 domains. The latter result suggested that ACK-1 may interact with Fyn at one or both of these sites, thus preventing the Fyn antibody from recognizing Fyn that is associated with ACK-1 in this manner. To test this hypothesis, SH-SY5Y cells were scrape loaded with GST fusion proteins of either the Fyn-SH2 or Fyn-SH3 domain, and mAChR-stimulated ACK-1 tyrosine phosphorylation in these cells was compared with control cells scrape loaded with GST alone. Agonist-induced ACK-1 phosphorylation was inhibited significantly in cells scrape loaded with either the Fyn-SH2 domain (approximately a 60% decrease compared with the GST control) or the Fyn-SH3 domain (approximately a 90% decrease compared with the GST control) (Fig. 7, A and C). Immunoblotting of cell lysates for GST showed that scrape loading of the Fyn-SH3 domain (which is smaller than the Fyn-SH2 domain) may have been slightly more efficient than that of the Fyn-SH2 domain (Fig. 7B). Collectively, these data indicate that Fyn tyrosine kinase is required for mAChR signaling to ACK-1, and moreover, Fyn may associate with ACK-1 via both SH2 domain- and SH3 domain-mediated interactions.



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Effects of scrape-loaded GST-Fyn-SH2 and GST-Fyn-SH3 on mAChR-mediated ACK-1 tyrosine phosphorylation. A, confluent cultures of SH-SY5Y cells were scrape loaded with either GST alone, GST-Fyn-SH2, or GST-Fyn-SH3 (each at a concentration of 20 µg/ml), as described under "Experimental Procedures." After resuspension in serum-free medium and replating for ~3 h, the cells were incubated for 5 min with either serum-free medium alone or containing 1 mM Oxo-M. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with polyclonal anti-ACK-1, and the isolated immune complexes were probed for Tyr(P) (PTyr). B, the post-ACK-1 immunoprecipitate lysates were resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF, and immunoblotted (IB) for GST. 2-µg aliquots of purified GST and fusion proteins were included as standards. C, densitometric analysis of the effects of scrape-loaded GST-Fyn-SH2 and GST-Fyn-SH3 on Oxo-M-induced ACK-1 tyrosine phosphorylation. The results are expressed as a percentage of the net agonist-induced increase in ACK-1 tyrosine phosphorylation observed in GST control cells and represent the means ± S.E. of three independent experiments. Oxo-M increased the tyrosine phosphorylation of ACK-1 in GST control cells from 0.03 ± 0.01 optical density units to 0.30 ± 0.14 optical density units. Double asterisks indicate a significant difference from the GST control (p < 0.01).



    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

A role for the nonreceptor tyrosine kinases, FAK and PYK-2, in the regulation of synaptic plasticity in the central nervous system has recently been reviewed (13). Similarly, members of the related ACK family of nonreceptor tyrosine kinases have also recently been postulated to regulate neurite outgrowth (14), given their high levels of expression in brain and their potential capacities to perpetuate the actin cytoskeletal remodeling activity of the small molecular weight GTPase Cdc42 (9, 12). In the current study, we demonstrate that stimulation of neuritogenic M3 mAChRs on SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells elicits an enhanced tyrosine phosphorylation of ACK-1 which occurs rapidly (within 1 min) on a time course that precedes that observed previously for mAChR-mediated neurite outgrowth (within minutes) in this same cell system (36) (Fig. 1). Given that a requirement for Cdc42 in the regulation of mAChR-induced neurite outgrowth has been described previously (23), the results of the present investigation are consistent with a role for ACK-1 tyrosine kinase in the process of growth cone remodeling. The mAChR-stimulated increase in the tyrosine phosphorylation of ACK-1 was dependent on the activity of a Rho family GTPase, most likely Cdc42, as demonstrated by its inhibition after preincubation with C. difficile toxin B (Fig. 2A). Recently, we have also described a novel requirement for Cdc42 function in the regulation of mAChR signaling to FAK (37). This latter observation, coupled with the recent findings of Eisenmann et al. (49) that Cdc42 and ACK-1 also regulate the tyrosine phosphorylation of the FAK substrate, p130Cas, suggests the potential for cross-talk between these two families of nonreceptor tyrosine kinases.

In the present study, the actin cytoskeletal disruptive effects of toxin B were dissociated from its ability to inhibit ACK-1 signaling by the observation that preincubation with cytochalasin D actually promoted ACK-1 phosphorylation (Fig. 2B). Moreover, addition of a mAChR agonist to cells preincubated with cytochalasin D elicited a further increase in ACK-1 tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 2B), suggesting that an intact actin cytoskeleton is not required for mAChR signaling to ACK-1. The above findings are in direct contrast to the absolute requirement for an intact actin cytoskeleton in mAChR signaling to FAK (Fig. 2B; Ref. 38). However, they are in agreement with a previous report that demonstrated that disruption of the actin cytoskeleton with cytochalasin leads to disassembly of the extracellular matrix (50). Matrix disassembly has, in turn, been shown to promote a compensatory activation of Cdc42, an enhanced formation of filopodia, and an increased tyrosine phosphorylation of ACK-1 (51). These last findings are further supported by our observation that ACK-1 phosphorylation induced by disruption of the cytoskeleton with cytochalasin D was blocked by inhibition of Rho family GTPase activity with toxin B (Fig. 2C). Furthermore, our results corroborate the observations of Yang et al. (14) who demonstrated that integrin-mediated ACK-2 tyrosine phosphorylation also does not depend on the integrity of the actin cytoskeleton, although it is uncertain why these authors did not observe an increase in ACK-2 phosphorylation after incubation with cytochalasin D alone.

Although stimulation of M3 mAChRs elicits both an increase in intracellular Ca2+ and an activation of PKC, neither of these second messenger pathways was required for mAChR signaling to ACK-1 in SH-SY5Y cells. Instead, receptor-mediated PKC activation was found to act as a negative feedback loop to limit signaling from mAChRs to ACK-1 (Fig. 3). The ability of PKC activity to blunt ACK-1 tyrosine phosphorylation was apparently not caused by direct phosphorylation of ACK-1 on inhibitory serine or threonine residues (Fig. 4). This result suggests that the PKC-mediated negative regulation of ACK-1 tyrosine phosphorylation may occur further upstream in the signaling pathway, perhaps at the level of the Cdc42 GTPase. In this context, it is interesting to note that serine phosphorylation of the small molecular weight GTPase, Rac1, by Akt kinase has recently been shown to inhibit the ability of Rac1 to bind GTP (52). This observation suggests the potential for negative regulation of Rho family GTPase function by serine-threonine kinases. In addition, activation of PKC in neuronal cells has been shown to induce a transient shift in actin cytoskeletal organization from predominantly filopodial projections to lamellipodial protrusions, indicating that PKC may be a negative regulator of Cdc42 function in vivo (53).

Perhaps the most significant result to come from the current study is the finding that Fyn, a Src family kinase, is required for receptor signaling to ACK-1. Inhibition of Src family kinase activity blunted mAChR-stimulated ACK-1 tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 5), and ACK-1 coprecipitated with Fyn tyrosine kinase, but not Src, in an agonist-dependent manner (Fig. 6). Although we observed a selective interaction of ACK-1 with Fyn rather than Src after mAChR stimulation in SH-SY5Y cells, this result does not preclude an interaction between ACK-1 and Src in other cell or receptor systems. In fact, there is often significant overlap in the interactions of multiple Src family members with a given substrate. For example, FAK has been shown to interact in vitro with both Src and Fyn, although Fyn is the principal regulator of FAK function in vivo as demonstrated by hypophosphorylation of FAK in neural tissue isolated from Fyn knockout mice (54). Thus, ACK-1 is similar to FAK and PYK-2 in that it interacts with Src family kinases and is a likely substrate for phosphorylation by this class of nonreceptor tyrosine kinase (45-48). The agonist dependence of the interaction between ACK-1 and Fyn observed in the present study suggests that receptor stimulation of Cdc42 activity and the subsequent binding of Cdc42 to ACK-1 may localize ACK-1 to the plasma membrane in close proximity to Fyn. This hypothesis is consistent with previous results of Yang and Cerione (12) who demonstrated that a constitutively active mutant of Cdc42 failed to stimulate ACK-2 tyrosine phosphorylation in vitro but that coexpression of this mutant with ACK-2 resulted in a marked enhancement of ACK-2 tyrosine phosphorylation and coassociation with Cdc42 in vivo. Collectively, these results suggest that the activation of ACK proteins by Cdc42 may be indirect, perhaps via localization of ACK to a site at which it can interact with other proteins that modulate its tyrosine phosphorylation and/or activity.

Finally, scrape loading SH-SY5Y cells with GST fusion proteins of either the Fyn-SH2 or Fyn-SH3 domain significantly attenuated mAChR signaling to ACK-1. The inhibitory effect was most pronounced in cells scrape loaded with the Fyn-SH3 domain (Fig. 7). These fusion proteins lack kinase activity and therefore likely inhibit ACK-1 phosphorylation by competing with endogenous Fyn for binding sites on the ACK-1 protein. Fyn may associate with ACK-1 via an interaction between the Fyn-SH3 domain and a proline-rich region on ACK-1 which is exposed after its association with GTP-bound Cdc42. Previous work has suggested that Cdc42 binding to the Cdc42/Rac-interactive binding domain of ACK-2 may dissociate an intramolecular interaction between the SH3 domain and a C-terminal proline-rich region of this protein (14). A similar process may occur after the association of ACK-1 with GTP-bound Cdc42, thus allowing for ACK-1 to interact with other target proteins via these structural motifs. Indeed an interaction between ACK-1 and the SH3 domain(s) of the adaptor protein GRB-2 after epidermal growth factor receptor stimulation has been described previously (55). Fyn may also interact with phosphorylated tyrosine residues on ACK-1 via the Fyn-SH2 domain.

In summary, stimulation of mAChRs on SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells elicited an enhanced tyrosine phosphorylation of the Cdc42 effector ACK-1. Agonist-stimulated ACK-1 phosphorylation was dependent on Fyn tyrosine kinase activity and the association of ACK-1 with Fyn via both SH2 domain- and SH3 domain-mediated interactions. The results suggest that the previously documented role of Cdc42 in the regulation of neurite outgrowth after cholinergic stimulation may also involve signaling via the nonreceptor tyrosine kinase ACK-1.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Klaus Aktories and Dr. Fred Hofmann for generously providing the C. difficile toxin B and Tim Desmond for assistance with image analysis of the immunoblots.


    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants NS23831 (to S. K. F.) and MH12193 (to D. A. L.), by a Department of Veterans Affairs merit award (to K. A. H.), and a research enhancement award (to K. A. H. and D. A. L.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Supported by National Institutes of Health Training Grant GM07767. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Denver VAMC-111H, Rm. 9C120, 1055 Clermont St., Denver, CO 80220. Tel.: 303-399-8020 (ext. 5264); Fax: 303-393-5271; E-mail: Dan.Linseman@UCHSC.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, November 21, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M006813300


    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: ACK, activated Cdc42Hs-associated kinase; FAK, focal adhesion kinase; GST, glutathione S-transferase; mAChR, muscarinic cholinergic receptor; MARCKS, myristoylated alanine-rich protein kinase C substrate; Oxo-M, 2-butyn-1-ammonium, N,N,N-trimethyl-4-(2-oxo-1-pyrrolidinyl)iodide; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PKC, protein kinase C; PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; PP1, 4-amino-5-(4-methylphenyl)-7-(t-butyl)pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine; PP2, 4-amino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-7-(t-butyl)pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine; PP3, 4-amino-7-phenylpyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine; PVDF, polyvinylidene fluoride; PYK-2, proline-rich tyrosine kinase-2; Tyr(P), phosphotyrosine..


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES


1. Malenka, R. C. (1994) Cell 78, 535-538[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. O'Dell, T. J., Kandel, E. R., and Grant, S. G. N. (1991) Nature 353, 558-560[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Boxall, A. R., Lancaster, B., and Garthwaite, J. (1996) Neuron 16, 805-813[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Williams, E. J., Walsh, F. S., and Doherty, P. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 124, 1029-1037[Abstract]
5. Worley, T. L., and Holt, C. E. (1996) J. Neurosci. 16, 2294-2306[Abstract]
6. Hunter, T. (1998) Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond-Biol. Sci. 353, 583-605[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Klesse, L. J., and Parada, L. F. (1999) Microsc. Res. Tech. 45, 210-216[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Neet, K., and Hunter, T. (1996) Genes Cells 1, 147-169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Manser, E., Leung, T., Salihuddin, H., Tan, L., and Lim, L. (1993) Nature 363, 364-367[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Burgaya, F., Menegon, A., Menegoz, M., Valtorta, F., and Girault, J.-A. (1995) Eur. J. Neurosci. 7, 1810-1821[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Lev, S., Moreno, H., Martinez, R., Canoll, P., Peles, E., Musacchio, J. M., Plowman, G. D., Rudy, B., and Schlessinger, J. (1995) Nature 376, 737-745[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Yang, W., and Cerione, R. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 24819-24824[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Girault, J.-A., Costa, A., Derkinderen, P., Studler, J.-M., and Toutant, M. (1999) Trends Neurosci. 22, 257-263[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Yang, W., Lin, Q., Guan, J.-L., and Cerione, R. A. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 8524-8530[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Kozma, R., Ahmed, S., Best, A., and Lim, L. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 1942-1952[Abstract]
16. Nobes, C. D., and Hall, A. (1995) Cell 81, 53-62[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Knaus, U. G., and Bokoch, G. M. (1998) Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 30, 857-862[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Manser, E., and Lim, L. (1999) Prog. Mol. Subcell. Biol. 22, 115-133[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Bi, E., and Zigmond, S. H. (1999) Curr. Biol. 9, R160-R163[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Snapper, S. B., and Rosen, F. S. (1999) Annu. Rev. Immun. 17, 905-929[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Luo, L., Jan, L., and Jan, Y. N. (1996) Perspect. Dev. Neurobiol. 4, 199-204[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Threadgill, R., Bobb, K., and Ghosh, A. (1997) Neuron 19, 625-634[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Kozma, R., Sarner, S., Ahmed, S., and Lim, L. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 1201-1211[Abstract]
24. Katoh, H., Aoki, J., Yamaguchi, Y., Kitano, Y., Ichikawa, A., and Negishi, M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 28700-28707[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Kranenburg, O., Poland, M., van Horck, F. P. G., Drechsel, D., Hall, A., and Moolenaar, W. H. (1999) Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 1851-1857[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Winkler, J., Suhr, S. T., Gage, F. H., Thal, L. J., and Fisher, L. J. (1995) Nature 375, 484-487[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Levey, A. I. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 13541-13546[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Avery, E. E., Baker, L. D., and Asthana, S. (1997) Drugs Aging 11, 450-459[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Growdon, J. H. (1997) Life Sci. 60, 993-998[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Biedler, J. L., Helson, L., and Spengler, R. (1973) Cancer Res. 33, 2643-2652[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Ross, R. A., and Biedler, J. L. (1985) Cancer Res. 45, 1628-1632[Abstract]
32. Lambert, D. G., Ghataorre, A. S., and Nahorski, S. R. (1989) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 165, 71-77[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Wall, S. J., Yasuda, R. P., Li, M., and Wolfe, B. B. (1991) Mol. Pharmacol. 40, 783-789[Abstract]
34. Lambert, D. G., and Nahorski, S. R. (1990) Biochem. J. 265, 555-562[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Fisher, S. K., Slowiejko, D. M., and McEwen, E. L. (1994) Neurochem. Res. 19, 549-554[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Rösner, H., Vacun, G., and Rebhan, M. (1995) Eur. J. Cell Biol. 66, 324-334[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Linseman, D. A., Hofmann, F., and Fisher, S. K. (2000) J. Neurochem. 74, 2010-2020[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Linseman, D. A., McEwen, E. L., Sorensen, S. D., and Fisher, S. K. (1998) J. Neurochem. 70, 940-950[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Flinn, H. M., and Ridley, A. J. (1996) J. Cell Sci. 109, 1133-1141[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Just, I., Seizer, J., Wilm, M., von Eichel-Streiber, C., Mann, M., and Aktories, K. (1995) Nature 375, 500-503[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Schaller, M. D., Borgman, C. A., Cobb, B. S., Vines, R. R., Reynolds, A. B., and Parsons, J. T. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 5192-5196[Abstract]
42. Brinson, A. E., Harding, T., Diliberto, P. A., He, Y., Li, X., Hunter, D., German, B., Earp, H. S., and Graves, L. M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1711-1718[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Linseman, D. A., Sorensen, S. D., and Fisher, S. K. (1999) J. Neurochem. 73, 1933-1944[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Slowiejko, D. M., Levey, A. I., and Fisher, S. K. (1994) J. Neurochem. 62, 1795-1803[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Calalb, M. B., Polte, T. R., and Hanks, S. K. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 954-963[Abstract]
46. Dikic, I., Tokiwa, G., Lev, S., Courtneidge, S. A., and Schlessinger, J. (1996) Nature 383, 547-550[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Qian, D., Lev, S., van Oers, N. S., Dikic, I., Schlessinger, J., and Weiss, A. (1997) J. Exp. Med. 185, 1253-1259[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Schaller, M. D., Hildebrand, J. D., and Parsons, J. T. (1999) Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 3489-3505[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Eisenmann, K. M., McCarthy, J. B., Simpson, M. A., Keely, P. J., Guan, J.-L., Tachibana, K., Lim, L., Manser, E., Furcht, L. T., and Iida, J. (1999) Nature Cell Biol. 1, 507-513[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Barry, E. L. R., and Mosher, D. F. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 10464-10469[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51. Bourdoulous, S., Orend, G., MacKenna, D. A., Pasqualini, R., and Ruoslahti, E. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 143, 267-276[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52. Kwon, T., Kwon, D. Y., Chun, J., Kim, J. H., and Kang, S. S. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 423-428[Abstract/Free Full Text]
53. Rösner, H., and Fischer, H. (1996) Neurosci. Lett. 219, 175-178[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Grant, S. G. N., Karl, K. A., Kiebler, M. A., and Kandel, E. R. (1995) Genes Dev. 9, 1909-1921[Abstract]
55. Satoh, T., Kato, J., Nishida, K., and Kaziro, Y. (1996) FEBS Lett. 386, 230-234[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.