The High Light-inducible Polypeptides in Synechocystis PCC6803

EXPRESSION AND FUNCTION IN HIGH LIGHT*

Qingfang HeDagger §, Nadia Dolganov, Olle BjörkmanDagger , and Arthur R. GrossmanDagger

From the Dagger  Department of Plant Biology, The Carnegie Institution of Washington, Stanford, California 94305 and the  Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford Medical School, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305

Received for publication, September 22, 2000, and in revised form, October 2, 2000



    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

There are five Synechocystis PCC6803 genes encoding polypeptides with similarity to the Lhc polypeptides of plants. Four of the polypeptides, designated HliA-D (Dolganov, N. A. M., Bhaya, D., and Grossman, A. R. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 636-640) (corresponding to ScpC, ScpD, ScpB, and ScpE in Funk, C., and Vermaas, W. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 9397-9404) contain a single transmembrane domain. The fifth polypeptide (HemH) represents a fusion between a ferrochelatase and an Hli-like polypeptide. By using an epitope tag to identify specifically the different Hli polypeptides, the accumulation of each (excluding HemH) was examined under various environmental conditions. The levels of all of the Hli polypeptides were elevated in high light and during nitrogen limitation, whereas HliA, HliB, and HliC also accumulated to high levels following exposure to sulfur deprivation and low temperature. The temporal pattern of accumulation was significantly different among the different Hli polypeptides. HliC rapidly accumulated in high light, and its level remained high for at least 24 h. HliA and HliB also accumulated rapidly, but their levels began to decline 9-12 h following the imposition of high light. HliD was transiently expressed in high light and was not detected 24 h after the initiation of high light exposure. These results demonstrate that there is specificity to the accumulation of the Hli polypeptides under a diverse range of environmental conditions. Furthermore, mutants for the individual and combinations of the hli genes were evaluated for their fitness to grow in high light. Although all of the mutants grew as fast as wild-type cells in low light, strains inactivated for hliA or hliC/hliD were unable to compete with wild-type cells during co-cultivation in high light. A mutant lacking all four hli genes gradually lost its photosynthesis capacity and died in high light. Hence, the Hli polypeptides are critical for survival when Synechocystis PCC6803 is absorbing excess excitation energy and may allow the cells to cope more effectively with the production of reactive oxygen species.



    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Light serves as an environmental signal that regulates physiological and developmental processes and provides energy that fuels the reduction of inorganic carbon. However, when photosynthetic organisms absorb excess excitation energy (more than can be used in photosynthesis), the light energy can cause damage to the cell (3, 4). There are several ways in which excess, absorbed, light energy can be harmful to photosynthetic organisms. It can accumulate in light-harvesting antenna complexes and reaction centers and promote the formation of singlet oxygen, superoxides, and hydroxyl radicals, all of which are highly reactive and potentially toxic. Reactive oxygen species could modify proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids, ultimately causing a loss of cell viability (5).

The photosynthetic reaction center polypeptide D1, or the 32-kDa polypeptide, is particularly susceptible to damage as a consequence of absorption of excess excitation energy (3, 6-8); this was first recognized by Kyle et al. (9). The 32-kDa polypeptide, together with the D2 polypeptide, forms the heterodimeric reaction center of photosystem II that binds all of the redox components involved in photosynthetic charge separation. The rapid restoration of photosystem II function following photodamage indicates the existence of a tightly regulated repair system (3). Repair processes include the degradation of damaged D1 polypeptide, de novo synthesis of D1 on chloroplast ribosomes, processing of newly synthesized D1, association of D1 with chlorophyll and its reaction center partner (D2), and assembly of the heterodimeric complex with other photosystem II polypeptides (3, 7, 10).

Both algae and vascular plants have evolved mechanisms for photo-acclimation that favor survival in high light (HL)1 (4, 11). These mechanisms involve changes in the composition of light-harvesting and/or reaction center pigment-protein complexes (reviewed in Ref. 12), redistribution of excitation energy between the photosystems (state transitions) (13, 14), and stabilization of photosynthetic membranes (15). Plants have also developed the capacity to efficiently transform excess absorbed light energy into heat, thereby dissipating the energy in a harmless manner. This thermal dissipation is measured as quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence or nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ) (4, 16, 17). NPQ is primarily a consequence of the operation of the xanthophyll cycle, which is required for the generation of zeaxanthin in HL (4, 18-20). The PsbS polypeptide, which has four membrane-spanning helices and shows homology to Lhc polypeptides, is also needed for NPQ (21). It has been postulated that quenching of singlet excited chlorophyll occurs by direct energy transfer to zeaxanthin (22). However, recent evidence (23, 24) suggests that xanthophyll-dependent quenching is more likely the result of conformational changes within the antennae complex (17, 26-28). Energy dissipation within the reaction center itself (29, 30) and cyclic electron flow around photosystem II that involves a low potential form of cytochrome b559 (31) may also contribute to photoprotection. Finally, reaction centers that are rendered nonfunctional via the absorption of excess excitation energy may continue to dissipate absorbed light energy as heat and serve a photoprotective role with respect to neighboring, functional photosystem II reaction centers (32). Other acclimation responses include the synthesis and recruitment of enzymes with antioxidant function such as superoxide dismutase (33), catalase (34-36), and ascorbate peroxidase (37, 38). Additionally, abundant soluble antioxidants in the chloroplast such as ascorbate and glutathione can act as quenchers of triplet chlorophyll and singlet oxygen (39).

One group of proteins that accumulates upon exposure of plants to HL is the ELIPs, or early light-inducible proteins. These were originally characterized as polypeptides that transiently accumulated in etiolated seedlings of pea and barley following HL treatment (40-44). This transient accumulation also occurred when plants were exposed to blue light, suggesting a role for the blue light photoreceptor in the induction process (45); other studies suggest that phytochrome may be involved in ELIP expression (46). In addition, ELIPs accumulate transiently under a variety of stress conditions (47-50) that would cause photoinhibition. This raises the possibility that the ELIPs function to protect plants from photooxidative damage and that expression of ELIP genes may be controlled by the redox state of the cell and/or the accumulation of reactive oxygen species.

ELIP genes from a number of different organisms have been cloned and sequenced (43, 51-53). Sequence comparisons have revealed that they are members of the chlorophyll a/b-binding protein or Lhc superfamily of proteins (54). The ELIPs have three transmembrane helices (TMH I-III) that correspond to the TMHs of the Lhc polypeptides (55). Although pigment binding by ELIPs has not been directly demonstrated, all ELIPs contain conserved residues that could potentially bind chlorophyll a (55). Even though it has been suggested that the ELIPs function as "pigment-carrier" proteins involved in the turnover and/or redistribution of pigment molecules under conditions when photosystem II components are being rapidly degraded and repaired (47), the exact role of ELIPs under light stress conditions is not clear. Recently, the Cbr protein of Dunaliella was shown to be associated with light-harvesting antenna complexes II and preferentially associated with specific pigment-protein subcomplexes that contain high levels of lutein and other xanthophylls (56).

Members of the Lhc gene family have also been identified that encode proteins with one and two TMHs. In Arabidopsis, two ELIP-like genes that encode thylakoid membrane polypeptides with two TMHs (the proteins are called Seps, stress enhanced proteins) were isolated (57). Expression of Sep genes increased in HL but not during other stress conditions. An ELIP-like protein with a single TMH has also been isolated from Arabidopsis (58). These single TMH polypeptides, designated Hli or Scp (1, 2), were first discovered in cyanobacteria. The single TMH in these polypeptides resembles TMH I or III of the Lhc polypeptides. Expression of the genes is strikingly similar to that of ELIP genes, suggesting that they have similar functions. There are five monocistronic hli genes on the Synechocystis PCC6803 genome (59, 60) that compose an hli multigene family (Ref. 2, CyanoBase); one of these represents a fusion with the ferrochelatase gene.

We have examined accumulation of the four Hli proteins (the ferrochelatase was excluded) of Synechocystis PCC6803 under several conditions that would result in the absorption of excess excitation energy by the photosynthetic apparatus, and we have investigated the phenotypes of hli deletion mutants. Our results indicate that Hli polypeptides accumulate when cyanobacteria are exposed to HL or other stress conditions and that they may form distinct protein complexes in the thylakoid membranes. Furthermore, mutants that cannot synthesize Hli polypeptides show growth characteristics similar to that of wild-type cells in low light (LL) but are unable to compete with wild-type cells during exposure to HL. A strain deleted for all four of the hli genes gradually loses photosynthetic function and dies following exposure to HL.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Culture Conditions-- Synechocystis PCC6803 was cultivated in BG-11 medium (61) buffered with 10 mM TES, pH 8.2, at 30 °C. Cultures were bubbled with 3% CO2 in air and illuminated with 40 µmol photon m-2 s-1 from incandescent bulbs. BG-11 medium lacking nitrogen (-N) or sulfur (-S) was prepared by replacing the NaNO3 for -N medium and MgSO4, ZnSO4, and CuSO4 for -S medium with equimolar amounts of the corresponding chloride salts (NaCl, MgCl2, ZnCl2, and CuCl2, respectively). For nutrient starvation experiments, cells grown in BG-11 medium were pelleted by centrifugation (5,000 × g, 5 min) and re-suspended in -N or -S medium. This step was repeated prior to allowing cells to grow in -N or -S medium. Procedures for initiating nutrient deprivation have been described previously (62).

For HL treatments, cells in mid-logarithmic growth phase (OD730 ~0.8) were diluted with fresh medium to an OD730 of ~0.3. The cells (in 50-ml culture tubes) were then placed in a temperature-controlled glass chamber (maintained at 30 °C) and exposed to 500 µmol photon m-2 s-1 white light for various lengths of time, as indicated in the text. For cold treatment, cultures were diluted with BG-11 medium chilled to 4 °C and then allowed to incubate at 4 °C with constant shaking for 6 h.

Mutant Construction-- To construct cell lines in which each of the Hli polypeptides was tagged with the His6 epitope, coding regions of individual hli genes were cloned in frame into the pQE expression vectors (Qiagen) (pQE-60 for ssl1633 (hliC); pQE-70 for ssr2595 (hliB), ssr1789 (hliD), ssl2542 (hliA)). Each hli promoter plus coding region (with the C-terminal His6 tag) was ligated sequentially to the 5 S t1t2 prokaryotic terminator, a drug-resistant cartridge, and the DNA sequences downstream of each of the corresponding hli genes. Fig. 1 shows a linear drawing of each plasmid containing an epitope-tagged chimeric hli gene, and the legend of the figure provides the sequences of the primers that were used to make the constructs. Each of the chimeric genes was sequenced to ensure that no errors were generated during gene construction. The constructs were transformed into Synechocystis PCC6803; the wild-type hli sequence was replaced by the chimeric hli-His6 sequence.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   A, plasmid constructs showing the different hli genes containing sequences encoding the His6 epitope tag; and B, constructs showing the deleted hliC and hliD genes. The primers used for PCR amplification of the different hli genes are as follows: hliA (0.23 kb), CTCGGCCTATTCTAagat(CAGG)CTATTTAACCAACCAATG (701,127-701,162) and TAATCCAAgc(TT)ATGCCCACCCGTGGCTTC (701,333-701,360); hliB (0.23 kb), CAACAgc(CT)ATGc(A)CTAGCCGCGGATTT (982,961-982,985) and ACCCAGCag(CA)ATct(TA)GAGAGAGAGCAACCAAC (983,161-983,190); hliC (0.23 kb), CTATGGAAAg(A)ATct(TA)CAGAATGCCGAAGAAGTG (1,141,792-1,141,823) and ACAGACTTGCCATGGGCGCAAT (1,142,005-1,142,026); hliD (0.20 kb), AGGAAATCg(C)CATGc(A)GTGAAGAACTACAAC (398,178-398,206) and AAGCCAACTCCag(CT)At(G)Ct(G)CAGTCCCAACCAG (398,343-398,372). The primers used to amplify the upstream (upstr) and downstream (dwstr) sequences are as follows: hliA-dwstr (0.49 kb), TTAGTTTGAg(T)CTc(A)TATTCCTTGCC (700,657-700,680) and AAATAGCCTc(G)TAGAATAGGCCGAG (701,127-701,150); hliB-dwstr (0.40 kb), TCTCTCTCTAga(AT)TGGCTGGGTGCAT (983,170-983,194) and ACCGTGGCTga(TG)GCTCTGCTTACGG (983,553-983,576); hliC-dwstr (0.38 kb), TTCCCAGAGctc(GGA)ACTGGCCGACGC (1,141,430-1,141,453) and GGCATTCTag(GT)AATTTTTCCATAGTTC (1,141,789-1,141,814); hliD- dwstr (0.42 kb), GCGCTAtct(GGG)AGa(T)TGGCTTATTGCTGCT (398,355-398,381) and TTGAAGGag(CA)CTCCCGCCCAGATGG (398,749-398,772); hliC-upstr (0.30 kb), CGGGAGGATcc(AA)TGTTAGGCTCAAAC (1,142,041-1,142,065) and CCGTAGATa(+)Tc(+)GG TTACCAGTCTTTC (1,142,311-1,142,334); hliD-upstr (0.38 kb), TCGGGTGATa(+)TCAGCAGGAGTTGG (397,804-397,826) and CCTGGGATcc(AA)TTAACTTAGTT TAC (398,157-398,180). The size of each PCR fragment generated by the primer pair is given in the legend next to the gene name in parentheses. Lowercase letters in the primer sequences of the legend indicate mutations introduced into the sequence; the original nucleotides are included in parentheses to the left of the corresponding mutations. + designates an insertion. Numbers in the parentheses to the left of each primer presented in the legend indicate the primer position in the cyanobacterial genome as given in CyanoBase. In the figure, the black boxes designate a His6 tag. 5Stlt2 represents the 5 S terminator sequence. The cassettes containing genes for drug resistance are as follows: Cmr, 0.85 kbp, chloramphenicol resistance; Kmr, 1.2 kbp, kanamycin resistance; Spcr, 2.0 kbp spectinomycin/streptomycin resistance. Restriction enzymes are designated Bm, BamHI; Ev, EcoRI; Hc, HincII; Hd, HindIII; Sc, SacI; Sp, SphI; Xh, XhoI.

Plasmids containing the hliA and hliB genes interrupted by erythromycin and spectinomycin resistance cassettes, respectively, were gifts from Wim Vermaas (Arizona State University). The hliA gene was interrupted at a SalI site located 72 base pairs downstream of the translation start site. The hliB gene was interrupted at a SacII site located 12 base pairs downstream of its translation start site. These constructs were generated by Funk and Vermaas2 and generously given to us. The gene disruptions were confirmed by PCR.3 The plasmids in which hliC and hliD were deleted (Delta hliC and Delta hliD) were generated by ligating a PCR fragment upstream of each gene (0.3 kb for hliC; 0.4 kb for hliD), a drug-resistant cartridge (kanamycin for hliC; chloramphenicol for hliD), and a PCR fragment generated to sequences downstream of each gene (0.4 kb for hliC; 0.5 kb for hliD), all in the proper orientation. Primers used for PCR amplifications, given in the legend of Fig. 1, incorporated different restriction endonuclease sites to facilitate cloning. A detailed representation of the constructs is depicted in Fig. 1.

The plasmids containing the interruptions/deletions were transformed into Synechocystis PCC6803, and transformants were selected on appropriate antibiotics. Single, double, and quadruple mutants (all of the hli genes were either disrupted or deleted) were constructed. Transformants were continuously subcultured until each mutant line contained homoplasmic interruptions of hli genes. Segregation of the altered gene(s) in each of the mutants was monitored by PCR of isolated genomic DNA using specific primers as follows: hliA, GATGGCTTGGGGAGCTTTAC at position 701,108-701,127 and GTGTTACAATAGTTAACATAG at position 701,375-701,395; hliB, CTCTTTTGGTCAACAGACTTGAC at position 982,862-982,884 and GCCCTGGTTCAGTAGATTGCTTG at position 983,198-983,220; hliC, ACTACAGGTACCCCAGGCCAG at position 1,141,750-1,141,770 and TGAAACCTGATGAATGACGACG at position 1,142,194-1,142,215; hliD, TTGGTGTGGCAATGGCTGGATG at position 398,000-398,021 and ATTGTACGCAAGCAGCAATAAGC at position 398,369-398,391. Preparation of Synechocystis PCC6803 genomic DNA was as described previously (63).

Preparation of Thylakoid Membranes-- Cyanobacterial cell pellets derived from cells grown to mid-logarithmic phase were resuspended in thylakoid buffer (1/100 of the original culture volume) which contained 20 mM MES/NaOH, pH 6.4, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM CaCl2, 20% glycerol (v/v), 1 mM freshly made phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 5 mM benzamidine HCl. The cell suspensions (0.4-0.6 ml) were transferred to a chilled microcentrifuge tube with approximately 0.5 ml of glass beads pre-wetted by thylakoid buffer and broken in a MiniBeadBeater by six breakage cycles at full speed (30 s for each cycle, followed by 3-5 min of chilling in ice water). After centrifugation at 1,600 × g for 10 min to remove unbroken cells and cellular debris, the supernatant was diluted 30-50-fold in thylakoid buffer, and thylakoid and cytoplasmic membranes were pelleted at 4 °C by centrifugation (20 min, 40,000 rpm in a Ti 50.2 rotor). The membranes were washed once and resuspended in thylakoid buffer (1 ml of buffer to 200 ml of the original culture volume). Sucrose density gradient centrifugation (64) was used to purify thylakoid membranes. Purified membranes were resuspended in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.5, containing 0.3 M sodium chloride.

SDS-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis and Western Blot Analyses-- Solubilization of thylakoid membranes and SDS-PAGE were performed as described by Peter and Thornber (65). Approximately 30 µg/lane membrane proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE in a 10-16% polyacrylamide gel. Polypeptides were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (66), and immunodetection of polypeptides containing the His6 epitope tag was performed using commercial antibodies, as recommended by the suppliers of the antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; Qiagen).

Concentrations of soluble polypeptides and thylakoid membrane polypeptides solubilized by incubation in 2% SDS at 37 °C for 15 min were determined. Protein extracts were centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 2 min to remove insoluble debris; the supernatants were diluted 10-fold with water, and the protein content was measured using BCA protein assay reagents (Pierce) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Gel Filtration-- A thylakoid membrane suspension at a concentration of 0.6 mg of chlorophyll/ml was solubilized with a surfactant mixture composed of 0.6% octyl glucoside and 0.6% decyl maltoside, at 4 °C for 30 min. The material that remained insoluble was removed by centrifugation at 26,000 rpm (Beckman TL 100 rotor, ~30,000 × g) for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatant (100 µl) was loaded onto a Superose column (type 6 HR 10/30, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) that was connected to an FPLC system (Millipore Waters, model 650E). The column was pre-equilibrated with elution buffer (0.1 M sodium phosphate, pH 7.5, 0.3 M sodium chloride, 0.1% octyl glucoside, 0.1% decyl maltoside) and eluted with the same buffer at a flow rate of 0.4 ml/min. Fractions (0.4 ml) were collected, and the polypeptides in the fractions were concentrated by precipitation by making the samples 10% trichloroacetic acid.

Growth and Competition Experiments-- Growth of the cultures was monitored as a change in optical density at 730 nm. Competition experiments were performed at 30 °C under LL (40 µmol photon m-2 s-1) or HL (500 µmol photon m-2 s-1). Wild-type Synechocystis PCC6803 cells and mutant strains were mixed at approximately equal densities (OD730 ~0.6) and diluted to an OD730 of approximately 0.05. An aliquot (5 µl) of the culture was diluted in 0.5 ml, and 50 µl (about 400 cells) was spread onto each BG-11 agar plate, both with and without antibiotics, to determine the initial proportion of wild-type and mutant cells. The mixed cultures were diluted ~10-fold with fresh medium containing appropriate antibiotics when the OD730 of the culture approached 0.8. Aliquots from the culture were sampled at various times following the initiation of the experiment and diluted, and approximately 400 cells were spread on each plate either containing or lacking the appropriate antibiotic.

Fluorescence Measurements-- The yield of chlorophyll fluorescence was continuously monitored using a pulse-amplitude-modulation chlorophyll fluorometer (Walz) with a pulse-amplitude-modulation 103 accessory, a water-jacketed cuvette, and a Schott KL 1500 lamp, which provided the actinic light. The cells were diluted to a chlorophyll concentration of 2 µg ml-1 prior to analysis. The minimal fluorescence level (F0) was monitored with red-modulated light (1.6 kHz) at 0.030 µmol photon m-2 s-1. The maximum fluorescence level of dark adapted (Fm) or light-adapted (Fm') cells was assessed by a 600 ms high intensity white pulse at 3400 µmol photon m-2 s-1. This light pulse transiently closes all of the photosystem II reaction centers (67). The maximal fluorescence level of a sample was determined in the presence of 20 µM 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (68) and white light.

Methyl Viologen and Norflurazon Treatment-- To induce oxidative stress artificially, LL-grown cultures that were in logarithmic phase were diluted to an OD730 of ~0.05 with fresh BG-11 medium. Methyl viologen (MV) or norflurazon were added to the cultures to a final concentration of 0.5 µM for MV and 25 µM for norflurazon. The cultures were incubated in low or intermediate (200 µmol photon m-2 s-1) light, and OD730 was used to determine the rate of growth of the cultures at various times following the addition of the herbicides.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Accumulation of Hli Polypeptides during Growth in Different Environmental Conditions-- The hliA transcript of Synechococcus PCC7942 was shown to accumulate upon exposure of cells to HL and nutrient limitation conditions (1). Both conditions result in the excess absorption of light energy by the photosynthetic apparatus. The hliA gene is similar to the four genes encoding Hli polypeptides (or Scps) in Synechocystis PCC6803 (2). Table I summarizes the gene names, the open reading frame designations as given in CyanoBase, and the size of the different deduced polypeptides. Fig. 2A shows the combinatorial alignments of the Hli polypeptides of Synechocystis PCC6803. Fig. 2B is a dendrogram representing the grouping of the four polypeptides into two distinct classes. HliA and HliB are most similar, with identities of 87.1%, whereas HliC and HliD are not quite as similar, with identities of 44.7%. We did not analyze the HemH protein, which is a fusion between the gene encoding the ferrochelatase and an hli-like gene.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Genes encoding Hli polypeptides of Synechocystis PCC6803
The table includes cyanobase open reading frame designation; other names given are used for the genes and the size of the deduced polypeptide.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   A, alignment of the amino acid sequences of the Hli polypeptides in Synechocystis PCC6803. Identical amino acids are highlighted with a black background, and similar amino acids have a shaded background. Based on the N-terminal sequence of purified Synechocystis PCC6803 HliC, which was MNNENSXF (where the X is ambiguous), the initiation of translation is at the second rather than the first methionine predicted in CyanoBase. B, dendrogram constructed from the sequences shown in A. The Hli polypeptides can be placed into two highly related groups.

To measure the relative levels of the Hli polypeptides in Synechocystis PCC6803 cells following exposure to different environmental conditions, we created four distinct Synechocystis PCC6803 strains in which one of the four Hli proteins was marked by insertion of the His6 epitope. The sites of insertion of the epitope tags are shown in Fig. 1. Monospecific antibodies directed against the His6 epitope were used to examine the levels of the specific Hli polypeptides in total membranes following exposure of the epitope-tagged strains to different environmental conditions. We did not detect Hli polypeptides in cells grown in LL on complete medium, unless solubilized membrane proteins were enriched for Hli polypeptides by passage over a Ni2+ affinity column (which binds to the His6 epitope; not shown). Therefore, although the Hli polypeptides are present in cells maintained in complete medium under LL conditions, they only accumulate to very low levels.

As shown in Fig. 3, all four of the Hli polypeptides accumulated to high levels following exposure of cells to HL. We estimate that there is a better than 10-fold increase in the levels of HliA, HliB, and HliC polypeptides following 6 h of HL exposure. The Hli polypeptides also accumulated under other stress conditions. The levels of all of the Hli polypeptides increased upon nitrogen starvation. Starvation for sulfur or exposure to chilling temperatures led to the accumulation of HliA, HliB, and HliC; this accumulation was comparable to that observed in HL. Interestingly, following exposure of the cells to low temperature, two polypeptides that exhibited immunoreactivity with antibodies against the His6 epitope tag were observed in the HliC-His6-tagged Synechocystis PCC6803 cell line. One of these polypeptides had a similar mobility on SDS-PAGE to that of the HliC that accumulated during other stress conditions, whereas the mobility of the other was slightly less. The increased apparent molecular mass of the more slowly migrating species may result from a specific modification of the protein. Preliminary results3 using anti-phosphothreonine/tyrosine/serine antibodies (Zymed Laboratories Inc. Laboratories) suggests that the change in mobility is not a consequence of phosphorylation of the polypeptide. The accumulation of the Hli polypeptides was generally lower during exposure of cells to -N and -S conditions, as compared with HL. Of all of the Hli polypeptides, HliC accumulated to the greatest extent during -N and -S conditions (approximately 55 and 65% of total Hli polypeptides, respectively, under the conditions shown). HliD accumulated to the least extent under all conditions tested and could not be detected when cells were exposed to either -S or low temperature conditions.



View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Accumulation of HliC, HliA, HliD, and HliB polypeptides during various stress conditions. Cell membranes were isolated and analyzed for Hli polypeptides that were His6-tagged both before (-) and after (+) the cells were exposed to HL (HL, 6 h), low temperature (LT, 4 °C, 6 h), and nitrogen (-N) and sulfur (-S) (62) deprivation for 12 and 30 h, respectively. Total membranes were isolated as described under "Materials and Methods" and membrane polypeptides fractionated by SDS-PAGE (12-16% polyacrylamide). The polypeptides were blotted onto nitrocellulose paper and probed with commercial antibodies specific for the His6 tag (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Control samples (-) were maintained at standard growth conditions.

Molecular masses of HliA and HliB, as estimated by SDS-PAGE, were roughly equivalent to values predicted from gene sequences. In contrast, the apparent molecular masses of HliC and HliD were considerably less and more, respectively, than the values predicted from CyanoBase information. The N-terminal sequence (see the legend of Fig. 2 for the sequence) of purified HliC polypeptide from Synechocystis PCC6803 cells exposed to HL revealed that this polypeptide initiates at a methionine that is 69 nucleotides downstream of the translation start site that had been predicted from the nucleotide sequence (CyanoBase). This smaller polypeptide was the only product detected by SDS-PAGE, although we cannot rule out the possibility that it resulted from a rapid and specific proteolysis that is not blocked by the suite of protease inhibitors used during the isolation of thylakoid membranes. The slow migration of HliD during SDS-PAGE may reflect altered binding of the anionic detergent.

Kinetics of Hli Polypeptide Accumulation upon High Light Exposure-- To define the kinetics of accumulation of the different Hli polypeptides, we isolated total cellular membranes at various times following transfer of different epitope-tagged strains to HL, and we evaluated the levels of the specific Hli polypeptides using antibodies against the His6 epitope tag. Western blot analyses of total membrane proteins are shown in Fig. 4. The accumulation of the HliA and HliB reached a maximum level within 1 h of transfer to HL. This level was maintained for up to 6 h following the initial transfer, after which the levels of these polypeptides gradually declined. HliC exhibited a slightly slower rate of accumulation, reaching maximum abundance at 3 h; this maximal level was maintained over the entire 24-h period tested. The level of the HliD polypeptide was lower than that of the other polypeptides. This polypeptide peaked in abundance at 6-9 h following the onset of HL and rapidly declined thereafter. These results suggest that all of the Hli polypeptides play a role in the acclimation of Synechocystis PCC6803 to HL. Temporal differences in polypeptide levels that are observed may reflect the different requirements of cells as they develop long term strategies for surviving HL conditions.



View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Accumulation of HliC, HliA, HliD, and HliB polypeptides following HL treatment. Wild-type (W) and the His6-tagged cell lines (H) were placed in HL for 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 h. At each time point the cells were pelleted by centrifugation and disrupted using the MiniBeadBeater (as described under "Materials and Methods"). The membranes were isolated and analyzed for the His6-tagged Hli polypeptides as described in the legend of Fig. 3.

Reduction in Hli Levels following Transfer of Cells to Low Light-- The ELIPs are rapidly degraded during recovery of cells from excess excitation (69). Many of the characteristics of ELIPs are similar to those of the Hli polypeptides. To investigate the stability of the Hli polypeptides in LL, we transferred Synechocystis PCC6803 hli-His6-tagged strains that had been exposed to HL for 6 h to LL and immunologically monitored Hli polypeptide levels. Aliquots of cells at different times following a return to LL growth conditions were used for thylakoid membrane isolation. As shown in the Western blots of Fig. 5, the HliA and HliB polypeptides were extremely unstable, and there is a loss of more than 80% of these polypeptides within 1 h of transfer of cells to LL. The HliC and HliD polypeptides are stable for the initial 3 h, after which they are rapidly degraded. This delay in the reduction in HliC and HliD levels coincides with a delay in the recovery of cell division and accumulation of phycocyanin and chlorophyll, suggesting that HliC and HliD may be important during this "latent" recovery stage. Interestingly, only when the Hli polypeptides were barely detectable did cell division and pigment accumulation proceed.



View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Change in the level of Hli polypeptides following transfer of the cells from HL to LL. Cells were incubated in HL for 6 h prior to being transferred to LL. The membranes were isolated and analyzed for the His6-tagged Hli polypeptides as described in the legend of Fig. 3.

FPLC Fractionation of Hli Complexes-- The Hli polypeptides were demonstrated to be exclusively in the thylakoid membranes (data not shown). To determine if they were constituents of multisubunit membrane complexes or were functional as monomers, we isolated thylakoids from the His6-tagged cell lines grown in HL for 6 h, solubilized the membranes with non-ionic detergents, fractionated membrane-protein complexes by FPLC, and tracked His6-tagged Hli polypeptides using the epitope-specific antibodies. As shown in Fig. 6, HliA and HliB polypeptides co-eluted in the ~100-kDa fraction, whereas HliC and HliD co-eluted in the ~50-kDa fraction. These data suggest that the Hli polypeptides function as complexes in the thylakoid membranes and that pairs of the Hli polypeptides may be associated with each other.



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Fractionation of Hli polypeptides. Cells containing the His6-tagged Hli polypeptides were incubated in HL for 6 h. Membrane isolation was as described in the legend of Fig. 3. The membranes were solubilized with mild detergents and fractionated by fast protein liquid chromatography as described under "Materials and Methods. Each fraction was analyzed for the His6-tagged polypeptide as described in the legend of Fig. 3.

High Light Sensitivity of hli Mutants-- We constructed Synechocystis PCC6803 strains in which the hli genes were inactivated by insertion of a drug-resistant marker gene; single, double, and quadruple mutants were constructed (see Fig. 1 and under "Materials and Methods"). The hliA, hliC, and hliD are monocitronic (2);3 therefore, interruption or deletion of these genes should not have a polar effect on downstream sequences. The hliB gene is co-transcribed with the open reading frame slr1544 that encodes a hypothetical protein of 103 amino acids.3 Interruption of hliB may have a polar effect; however, interruption of the hliB gene does not have any observable phenotype under the conditions tested. The relationship of the co-transcribed sequence to the hli genes and its potential role in acclimation needs further analysis.

To determine the fitness of the hli deletion strains to compete with wild-type cells in HL, we performed competition experiments in which the wild-type and mutant strains were mixed, placed in HL, and samples of the culture taken at various times following HL exposure to determine the wild-type:mutant ratio in the cultures. When single mutants, double mutants, and the quadruple mutant in the hli genes were mixed with wild-type cells, the ratio of mutant to wild-type cells remained constant during growth in LL for at least 4-6 days. Furthermore, the hliB, hliC, and hliD single mutants appeared to have none or little competitive disadvantage in HL relative to wild-type cells (data not shown). In contrast, when either the hliA or the hliA/hliB and the hliC/hliD double mutants were mixed with wild-type cells and exposed to HL, the ratio of wild-type to mutant cells rapidly increased. Four days following the initiation of HL exposure, the cultures contained 10% or less of the mutant cells (Fig. 7). The quadruple mutant was very sensitive to HL; its photosynthetic capacity was reduced to a very low level within 12 h of the onset of HL (Fig. 8A). After 2 days in HL this mutant stopped dividing and gradually died (Fig. 8B). These results clearly establish that the Hli polypeptide family is required for the acclimation of Synechocystis PCC6803 to HL, and also suggests that there is some redundancy in function of the Hli polypeptides. Although all of the single and double hli mutants can grow in HL, some cannot grow as well as wild-type cells. In contrast, when all of the hli genes are disrupted, HL becomes lethal, although the strain grows at a rate comparable to that of wild-type cells in LL.



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Bar graphs representing the competitive growth of wild-type cells (wt) and strains inactivated for specific hli genes. The hli mutant cells (hliA, hliC/hliD, and hliA/hliB) were mixed with wild-type cells, and the cultures were placed in HL (right graphs) or LL (left graphs). Aliquots of the cells were removed at the number of days indicated below each bar in the bar graphs and plated onto BG11 agar plates with or without the appropriate antibiotics. Plated cells were grown in LL for 2 weeks. Single colonies that formed on the plates were quantified to determine the proportion of wild-type and hli-disruption strains in the cell population.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Effects of HL on variable fluorescence (A) and cell growth (B). LL-grown cells were diluted to a chlorophyll concentration of 2 µg/ml, transferred to a water-jacketed cuvette, and continuously illuminated with HL. The chlorophyll fluorescence was continuously monitored using a pulse-amplitude-modulation fluorometer as described under "Materials and Methods." Growth of wild type (wt) and the quadruple hli mutant in HL was monitored as a change in optical density at 730 nm. Viability of the cells was determined by spotting culture aliquots onto BG11 plates, which were then incubated in LL for 1-2 weeks.

Oxidative Stress Induction-- To test the sensitivity of the hli quadruple mutant to artificially generated reactive oxygen species, the growth of wild-type cells and the quadruple mutant was monitored at a light intensity of 200 µmol photon m-2 s-1 in the presence and absence of 0.5 µM MV or 25 µM norflurazon; these doses of the herbicide were sublethal for Synechocystis PCC6803. In photosynthetic organisms, MV catalyzes the formation of O2- primarily at the acceptor side of photosystem I. In contrast, the herbicide norflurazon promotes the accumulation of 1O2* within thylakoid membrane as it inhibits biosynthesis of carotenoids, which are the dominant quenchers of 1O2* generated by the antenna pigments. As shown in Fig. 9, an intensity of 200 µmol photon m-2 s-1 does not markedly inhibit the growth of the quadruple mutant, and MV at a sublethal concentration of 0.5 µM inhibits growth of both strains to the same extent. These results suggest that the activities of detoxification enzymes such as superoxide dismutase, peroxidases, and catalases are not significantly affected in hli mutants. In contrast, norflurazon was shown to inhibit consistently the growth of the quadruple mutant to a greater extent than that of wild-type cells, suggesting that the Hli polypeptides may play a role, either directly or indirectly, in detoxification of 1O2* generated within thylakoid membranes. The sublethal concentration of norflurazon used to retard growth of Synechocystis PCC6803 was 25 µM, which is substantially higher than the dose (0.5-5 µM) reported to kill Synechococcus PCC7942 (70, 71).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Growth of wild type (wt) and the quadruple hli mutant (4xhli) in the presence of 0.5 µM MV and 25 µM norflurazon (NF). Cells were incubated in 200 µmol photon m-2 s-1, and cell growth was measured as a change in optical density at 730 nm. Curves were generated by averaging the data obtained from three representative experiments. Errors were within 5% for all points.



    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We have used epitope tagging to study the accumulation of the Synechocystis PCC6803 Hli polypeptides. All four of the Hli polypeptides are induced when the cyanobacterial cells are exposed to stress conditions. They accumulate following nutrient limitation, cold treatment, and high intensity illumination. Under all of these stress conditions the cells absorb excess excitation energy that causes hyper-reduction of the acceptor side components of photosystem II, the formation of triplet chlorophyll, the generation of singlet oxygen within antenna and reaction centers, and the production of superoxide radicals (38, 72).

During growth of Synechocystis PCC6803 under our standard LL conditions (40 µmol photon m-2 s-1, 30 °C, nutrient-replete), the Hli polypeptides are not detected unless specific methods are used for their enrichment. By using genetic lines expressing His6-tagged Hli polypeptides, enrichment was achieved by binding the His6 tag to a Ni2+-affinity column. The results demonstrated the presence of all four Hli polypeptides even under LL conditions.3 However, the accumulation of the Hli polypeptides is markedly stimulated following exposure of the cells to a variety of different stress conditions. Although HliA, HliB, and HliC accumulated under all stress conditions tested, HliD was only detected in cells exposed to HL or starved for nitrogen (it was not detected in cells starved for sulfur or exposed to low temperatures). Not only does HliD generally show the lowest levels of accumulation, its expression is also transient in HL; the level of HliD peaks between 6 and 9 h, and by 24 h the polypeptide can no longer be detected. These results suggest that the acclimation process results in either the destabilization of HliD and/or strongly reduces the rate of hliD transcription relative to degradation. All of the other Hli polypeptides can be detected for at least 24 h following exposure to HL, with the level of HliC remaining constant from 3 to 24 h and the levels of HliA and HliB decreasing significantly. The results also suggest that the acclimation process can be divided into distinct phases. During the initial phase there is a rapid increase in Hli polypeptides, especially HliA and HliB. HliD appears to be the least sensitive to the HL treatment; it is the only Hli polypeptide that cannot be detected after 1 h of exposure to HL. The levels of all of the Hli polypeptides peak between 6 and 9 h, after which they begin to fall, except for HliC. The level of HliD polypeptide falls most rapidly and is not readily detected after 24 h in HL, whereas HliA and HliB fall to about 25% of peak levels.

Epitope tagging technology was used to examine the expression patterns of the Hli polypeptides. Although this procedure is widely used and is a generally accepted approach to examine expression and sub-cellular location of proteins, there is the possibility that the His6 tag alters the stability or aspects of targeting of Hli polypeptides, which could affect expression patterns. To examine this possibility we generated antibodies against recombinant HliD and used the antibodies to quantify accumulation of HliD in both wild-type cells and the hliD-His6 strain of Synechocystis PCC6803. The patterns of accumulation of His6-HliD and unmodified HliD following high light exposure were identical.3 The kinetics of degradation of tagged and untagged HliD were also identical.3 Although we have not analyzed the pattern of expression of the other unmodified Hli polypeptides, the results with respect to HliD make it unlikely that the tag significantly influences expression patterns.

Interesting, Synechocystis PCC6803 stops growing immediately following exposure to HL, and only resumes growth after approximately 6 h in HL. The initial accumulation of Hli polypeptides occurs during the phase of acclimation in which the cells are unable to divide. Once the cells reach a new physiological steady state that accommodates the new light conditions, they begin to divide and the levels of Hli polypeptides fall. This decline may reflect a modification of the polypeptide and lipid composition of the photosynthetic machinery that enables the cells to balance more efficiently the utilization and dissipation of absorbed light energy, which allows for continued growth. These modifications also alter the need for Hli polypeptides. The results also suggest that HliA, HliB, and HliC may be important for sustained growth in HL and that these polypeptides may have some overlapping function. This possibility is supported by the finding that whereas the quadruple hli mutant dies upon exposure to HL, none of the single or double mutants die (although a number of them do not grow as fast as wild-type cells following exposure to HL).

Some results suggest that HliA/HliB and HliC/HliD may form complexes in the photosynthetic membranes. However, these results are only based on co-migration of polypeptides following solubilization of thylakoid membranes. The possibility of a complex between HliA/HliB has some support with the findings that these polypeptides increase and decrease with exactly the same kinetics following exposure to HL. Although the kinetics of accumulation of HliC and HliD differ following the transfer of cells from LL to HL, they decrease with the same kinetics following transfer from HL to LL. In addition, the wild-type HliD polypeptide was found to be present in sucrose gradient fractions containing His6-tagged HliC.3 Hence, the Hli polypeptides are likely to exist in multimeric structures, as suggested by the migration of the solubilized polypeptides during gel filtration (Fig. 6) and their sedimentation in sucrose gradients. However, the nature of these complexes and the structural relationships among the different Hli polypeptides remain to be established.

A number of polypeptides have been identified that increase the ability of photosynthetic organisms to survive HL exposure. Some of these polypeptides such as superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase may be involved in rapidly eliminating potentially toxic, reactive oxygen species that form following HL exposure. Others such as PsbS (21, 73) and IsiA (74) may be involved in quenching singlet excited chlorophyll molecules, which would prevent the accumulation of toxic oxygen species. The specific role of the Hli polypeptides in photoprotection is still not clear, although it has been proposed to function in the dissipation of excess absorbed excitation energy (1, 58) or serve as a chlorophyll carrier (2).

A recent report by Funk and Vermaas (2) suggests that the hli genes of Synechocystis PCC6803 are not significantly induced when the cells are transferred from moderate light (50 µmol photon m-2 s-1) to HL (250 µmol photon m-2 s-1). However, high level hli expression was observed in glucose-grown cells lacking photosystem I or lacking both photosystems I and II (2). The authors suggest that the Hli polypeptides function to bind free chlorophyll under such conditions and that they may not be responsive to the redox conditions of the cell. The binding of chlorophyll and/or chlorophyll intermediates could protect the cyanobacterium from the potentially phototoxic effect of these free pigments. Some aspects of these data are difficult to interpret. The HL intensities used may not have been sufficiently high to induce the hli genes (especially if the signal for their induction relates to the accumulation of reactive oxygen species) and/or the treatment times may have been suboptimal for detecting hli transcripts (1).3 Furthermore, mutants devoid of the photosystems may be aberrant in membrane structure/organization because of the absence of major complexes within the membranes. It would be difficult to predict the redox state of such cells or their tendency for generating reactive oxygen species; either direct or indirect methods would be required to quantify the levels of such species.

There are several lines of evidence to support the proposal that the Hli polypeptides are required for survival and acclimation of cells to the absorption of excess light energy and that they are probably not major chlorophyll carriers in the cell (although they may be adapted to bind and store free chlorophyll specifically when cells are absorbing excess excitation). First, accumulation of Hli polypeptides is triggered whenever Synechocystis PCC6803 is absorbing excess excitation energy. Second, some of the single (hliA) and double (hliC/hliD; hliA/hliB) mutants cannot compete with wild-type cells during exposure to excess excitation energy; their growth rate is equal to that of wild-type cells in LL (doubling time of approximately 8 h). A mutant defective for all four hli genes dies upon exposure to HL. When wild-type cells are exposed to HL, cell growth stops and only proceeds after approximately 6 h of acclimation. The cells then begin to rapidly divide. Although the quadruple mutant grows at a similar rate to wild-type cells even at light intensities up to 200 µmol photon m-2 s-1 (Fig. 9), it only grows to a small extent following the transfer to 500 µmol photon m-2 s-1. After the mutant experiences the 6-h HL acclimation period, it exhibits slow growth that ceases after about 30 h, at which time the cells are nearly all dead. Furthermore, during the first 6-10 h of acclimation, wild-type cells lose approximately 50% of their capacity for photosystem 2 activity (the variable fluorescence declines by 50%); the remaining activity is sustained during HL growth. In contrast, photosystem 2 activity in the quadruple mutant declines to nearly zero following 10 h in HL, suggesting the destruction of the photosynthetic machinery in the mutant strain. If the Hli polypeptides served as major chlorophyll carriers, the quadruple mutant would be expected to be impaired in growth in LL and moderate light since they would likely be required as the cells are synthesizing high levels of chlorophyll and chlorophyll-protein complexes under such conditions. Furthermore, bleached, nitrogen-starved cells also synthesize high levels of the Hli polypeptides.3 When nitrogen is provided to the starved cultures, the cells regain their pigmentation and the Hli proteins disappear. However, the disappearance of these proteins precedes re-greening of the cell; these kinetic features are not so easy to reconcile with a major chlorophyll carrier function.

The biggest questions that still remain are as follows. 1) How widespread are the Hli polypeptides in photosynthetic organisms? 2) How are they organized in the photosynthetic apparatus? 3) What are their specific functions? 4) How do they perform these functions? 5) What are the different specificities among the different members of this polypeptide family in cyanobacteria? 6) What features of the different polypeptides confer this specificity? Genes encoding Hli proteins have been identified in a number of cyanobacteria (1, 60, 75) and red algae (76-78). Recently, an hli cDNA was also identified from Arabidopsis (58). Characterization of the Arabidopsis hli gene suggests that the vascular plant Hli polypeptide is imported into chloroplasts and, similar to observations made with cyanobacteria, the level of the hli transcript increases following exposure of Arabidopsis to HL (58). These authors suggest that Hli polypeptides function in the dissipation of excess excitation energy.

The work presented here demonstrates the accumulation of the different Hli polypeptides in the thylakoid membranes and their requirement for survival during exposure to HL. Furthermore, HL completely destroys photosystem II function in the hli quadruple mutant, suggesting that these polypeptides are involved in protecting/stabilizing the photosynthetic apparatus, and perhaps other aspects of the metabolic machinery of the cell, from photodestruction. Although the precise mechanism for protection is still not clear, it is likely to involve either suppressed generation or elevated rates of quenching of reactive oxygen species by pigment-protein complexes containing Hli polypeptides. This possibility is suggested by preliminary experiments in which cyanobacterial cells were exposed to norflurazon. This inhibitor of carotenoid synthesis facilitates the accumulation of singlet oxygen (79) and leads to the induction of the Hli polypeptides in wild-type Synechocystis PCC6803.3 Interestingly, the hli quadruple mutant is significantly more sensitive to the administration of sublethal doses of norflurazone than wild-type cells. The finding suggests that the mutant strain has a reduced capacity for detoxification of singlet oxygen. A more detailed biochemical analysis of the wild-type and mutant strains should clearly establish the role of the Hli polypeptides in maintaining photosynthetic activity and viability of the cells in HL.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. Wim Vermaas and Christiane Funk for making some of the hli mutants available and Dr. Lori Van Wassbergen for designing the primers used for cloning the hli coding regions. We are also grateful to Devaki Bhaya, Chung Soon Im, Chao Jung Tu, Ling Zhang, John Christie, Jeff Shrager, Dafna Elrad, Barb Sears, and Winslow Briggs for helpful discussions.


    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by United States Department of Agriculture Grant 97-35301-4575 (to A. R. G.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Plant Biology, The Carnegie Institution of Washington, 260 Panama St., Stanford, CA 94305. Tel.: 650-325-1521 (ext. 286); E-mail: qingfang@ andrew2.stanford.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 6, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M008686200

2 C. Funk and W. Vermaas, unpublished data.

3 Q. He, N. Dolganov, O. Björkman, and A. R. Grossman, unpublished data.


    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: HL, high light; NPQ, nonphotochemical quenching; ELIP, early light inducible proteins; TMH, transmembrane helices; LL, low light; TES, 2-{[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]amino}ethanesulfonic acid; MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; FPLC, fast protein liquid chromatography; MV, methyl viologen; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; kb, kilobase; kbp, kilobase pairs.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES


1. Dolganov, N. A. M., Bhaya, D., and Grossman, A. R. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 636-640[Abstract]
2. Funk, C., and Vermaas, W. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 9397-9404[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Melis, A. (1999) Trends Plant Sci. 4, 130-135[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Niyogi, K. K. (1999) Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 50, 333-359[CrossRef]
5. Halliwell, B., and Gutteridge, J. M. C. (1999) Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine , pp. 1-104, Oxford University Press Inc., New York
6. Andersson, B., Salter, A. H., Virgin, I., Vass, I., and Syring, S. (1992) J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 15, 15-31[CrossRef]
7. Aro, E. M., McCaffery, S., and Anderson, J. M. (1993) Plant Physiol. 103, 835-843[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Ohad, I., Kyle, D. J., and Arntzen, C. J. (1984) J. Cell Biol. 99, 481-485[Abstract]
9. Kyle, D. J., Ohad, I., and Arntzen, C. J. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81, 4070-4074[Abstract]
10. Critchley, C., and Russell, A. W. (1994) Physiol. Plant. 92, 188-196[CrossRef]
11. Durnford, D. G., and Falkowski, P. G. (1997) Photosynth. Res. 53, 229-241[CrossRef]
12. Demmig-Adams, B., and Adams, W. W. (1992) Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 43, 599-626[CrossRef]
13. Biggins, J., and Bruce, D. (1989) Photosynth. Res. 20, 1-34
14. Fujita, Y. (1997) Photosynth. Res. 53, 83-93[CrossRef]
15. Havaux, M., and Niyogi, K. K. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 8762-8767[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Gilmore, A. M. (1997) Physiol. Plant. 99, 197-209[CrossRef]
17. Horton, P., Ruban, A. V., and Walters, R. G. (1996) Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 47, 655-684[CrossRef]
18. Bartley, G. E., and Scolnik, P. A. (1995) Plant Cell 7, 1027-1038[Free Full Text]
19. Demmig-Adams, B., and Adams, W. W. (1996) Trends Biochem. Sci. 1, 21-26
20. Ruban, A. V., and Horton, P. (1995) Plant Physiol. 108, 721-726[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Li, X. P., Bjorkman, O., Shih, C., Grossman, A. R., Rosenquist, M., Jansson, S., and Niyogi, K. K. (2000) Nature 403, 391-395[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Frank, H. A., Cua, A., Chynwat, V., Young, A., Gosztola, D., and Wasielewski, M. R. (1994) Photosynth. Res. 41, 389-395
23. Frank, H. A., Bautista, J. A., Josue, J. S., and Young, A. J. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 2831-2837[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Polivka, T., Herek, J. L., Zigmantas, D., Akerlund, H. E., and Sundstrom, V. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 4914-4917[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Crofts, J., and Horton, P. (1991) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1058, 187-193
26. Ruban, A. V., Horton, P., and Young, A. J. (1993) J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 21, 229-234[CrossRef]
27. Ruban, A. B., Young, A., and Horton, P. (1994) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1186, 123-127
28. Ruban, A. V., and Horton, P. (1999) Plant Physiol. 119, 531-542[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. De Las Rivas, J., Telfer, A., and Barber, J. (1993) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1142, 155-164
30. Schweitzer, R. H., and Brudvig, G. W. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 11351-11359[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Allakhverdiev, S. I., Klimov, V. V., and Carpentier, R. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 4149-4154[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Öquist, G., Chow, W. S., and Anderson, J. M. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 16745-16754
33. Bowler, C., Van Camp, W., Van Montagu, M., and Inze, D. (1994) Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 13, 199-218
34. Hertig, B., Streb, P., and Feierabend, J. (1992) Plant Physiol. 100, 1547-1553
35. Holtman, W. L., deGraaff, A. M., Lea, P. J., and Kijne, J. W. (1998) J. Exp. Bot. 49, 1303-1306[Abstract]
36. Hwang, S. Y., Lin, H. W., Chern, R. H., Lo, H. F., and Li, L. (1999) Plant Growth Regul. 27, 167-172[CrossRef]
37. Asada, K. (1992) Physiol. Plant. 85, 235-241[CrossRef]
38. Asada, K. (1992) Photosynth. Res. 34, 105-105
39. Foyer, C. H., Descourvieres, P., and Kunert, K. J. (1994) Plant Cell Environ. 17, 507-523
40. Adamska, I., Kloppstech, K., and Ohad, I. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 24732-24737[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Adamska, I., Ohad, I., and Kloppstech, K. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 2610-2613[Abstract]
42. Green, B. R., Pichersky, E., and Kloppstech, K. (1991) Trends Biochem. Sci. 16, 81-186[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Kolanus, W., Scharnhorst, C., Kuhne, U., and Herzfeld, F. (1987) Mol. Gen. Genet. 209, 234-239
44. Potter, E., and Kloppstech, K. (1993) Eur. J. Biochem. 214, 779-786[Abstract]
45. von Lintig, J., Welsch, R., Bonk, M., Giuliano, G., Batschauer, A., and Kleinig, H. (1997) Plant J. 12, 625-634[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Adamska, I. (1995) Plant Physiol. 107, 1167-1175[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Adamska, I. (1997) Physiol. Plant. 100, 794-805[CrossRef]
48. Montane, M. H., Dreyer, S., Triantaphylides, C., and Kloppstech, K. (1997) Planta 202, 293-302[CrossRef]
49. Montane, M. H., Petzold, B., and Kloppstech, K. (1999) Planta 208, 519-527[CrossRef]
50. Neale, A. D., Blomstedt, C. K., Bronson, P., Le, T. N., Guthridge, K., Evans, J., Gaff, D. F., and Hamill, J. D. (2000) Plant Cell Environ. 23, 265-277[CrossRef]
51. Grimm, B., and Kloppstech, K. (1987) Eur. J. Cell Biol. 43, 21-21
52. Yamagata, H., and Bowler, C. (1997) Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 61, 2143-2144[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Kloppstech, K. (1997) Physiol. Plant. 100, 739-747[CrossRef]
54. Kruse, E., Grimm, B., and Kloppstech, K. (1989) Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler 370, 925-925
55. Green, B. R., and Kuhlbrandt, W. (1995) Photosynth. Res. 44, 39-148
56. Banet, G., Pick, U., and Zamir, A. (2000) Planta 210, 947-955[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
57. Heddad, M., and Adamska, I. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 3741-3746[Abstract/Free Full Text]
58. Jansson, S., Andersson, J., Jung-Kim, S., and Jackowski, G. (2000) Plant Mol. Biol. 42, 345-351[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
59. Kaneko, T., and Tabata, S. (1997) Plant Cell Physiol. 38, 1171-1176[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
60. Kaneko, T., Sato, S., Kotani, H., Tanaka, A., Asamizu, E., Nakamura, Y., Miyajima, M., Hirosawa, M., Sugiura, M., Sasamoto, S., Kimura, T., Hosouchi, T., Matsuno, A., Muraki, A., Nakazaki, N., Naruo, K., Okumura, S., Shimpo, S., Takeuchi, C., Wada, T., Watanabe, A., Yamada, M., Yasuda, M., and Tabata, S. (1996) DNA Res. 3, 109-136[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
61. Rippka, R., Deruelles, J., Waterbury, J. B., Herdman, M., and Stanier, R. Y. (1979) J. Gen. Microbiol. 111, 1-61
62. Collier, J. L., and Grossman, A. R. (1992) J. Bacteriol. 174, 4718-4726[Abstract]
63. He, Q. F., and Vermaas, W. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 5830-5835[Abstract/Free Full Text]
64. Wolfe, G. R., Cunningham, F. X., Grabowski, B., and Gantt, E. (1994) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1188, 357-366
65. Peter, G. F., and Thornber, J. P. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 16745-16754[Abstract/Free Full Text]
66. Towbin, H., Staehelin, T., and Gordon, J. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 76, 4350-4354[Abstract]
67. El Bissati, K., Delphin, E., Murata, N., Etienne, A. L., and Kirilovsky, D. (2000) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1457, 229-242[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
68. Duysens, L. N. (1972) Biophys. J. 12, 858-863[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
69. Adamska, I., Kloppstech, K., and Ohad, I. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 5438-5444[Abstract/Free Full Text]
70. Thomas, D. J., Avenson, T. J., Thomas, J. B., and Herbert, S. K. (1998) Plant Physiol. 116, 1593-1602[Abstract/Free Full Text]
71. Windhövel, U., Sandmann, G., and Boger, P. (1997) Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 57, 68-78[CrossRef]
72. Herbert, S. K., Samson, G., Fork, D. C., and Laudenbach, D. E. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 8716-8720[Abstract]
73. Iwasaki, T., Saito, Y., Harada, E., Kasai, M., Shoji, K., Miyao, M., and Yamamoto, N. (1997) Gene (Amst.) 185, 223-229[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
74. Park, Y. I., Sandstrom, S., Gustafsson, P., and Öquist, G. (1999) Mol. Microbiol. 32, 123-129[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
75. Brahamsa, B., and Haselkorn, R. (1991) J. Bacteriol. 173, 2442-2450[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
76. Maid, U., and Zetsche, K. (1992) Plant Mol. Biol. 19, 1001-1010[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
77. Reith, B., and Mumholland, J. (1995) Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 13, 333-335
78. Stirewalt, V. L., Michalowski, C. B., Löffelhardt, W., Bohnert, H. J., and Bryant, D. A. (1995) Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 13, 327-332
79. Boger, P. (1996) J. Pestic. Sci. 21, 473-478


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.