Angiogenesis Activators and Inhibitors Differentially Regulate Caveolin-1 Expression and Caveolae Formation in Vascular Endothelial Cells
ANGIOGENESIS INHIBITORS BLOCK VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR-INDUCED DOWN-REGULATION OF CAVEOLIN-1*

Jun LiuDagger , Babak RazaniDagger §, Shaoqing Tangparallel , Bruce I. Terman, J. Anthony WareDagger parallel , and Michael P. LisantiDagger **Dagger Dagger

From the Departments of Dagger  Molecular Pharmacology and  Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, and ** The Albert Einstein Cancer Center, Bronx, New York 10461

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Angiogenesis is the process by which new blood vessels are formed via proliferation of vascular endothelial cells. A variety of angiogenesis inhibitors that antagonize the effects of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) have recently been identified. However, the mechanism by which these diverse angiogenesis inhibitors exert their common effects remains largely unknown. Caveolin-1 and -2 are known to be highly expressed in vascular endothelial cells both in vitro and in vivo. Here, we examine the potential role of caveolins in the angiogenic response. For this purpose, we used the well established human umbilical vein endothelial cell line, ECV 304. Treatment of ECV 304 cells with known angiogenic growth factors (VEGF, bFGF, or hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor), resulted in a dramatic reduction in the expression of caveolin-1. This down-regulation event was selective for caveolin-1, as caveolin-2 levels remained constant under these conditions of growth factor stimulation. VEGF-induced down-regulation of caveolin-1 expression also resulted in the morphological loss of cell surface caveolae organelles as seen by transmission electron microscopy. A variety of well characterized angiogenesis inhibitors (including angiostatin, fumagillin, 2-methoxy estradiol, transforming growth factor-beta , and thalidomide) effectively blocked VEGF-induced down-regulation of caveolin-1 as seen by immunoblotting and immunofluorescence microscopy. However, treatment with angiogenesis inhibitors alone did not significantly affect the expression of caveolin-1. PD98059, a specific inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase and a known angiogenesis inhibitor, also blocked the observed VEGF-induced down-regulation of caveolin-1. Furthermore, we show that caveolin-1 can function as a negative regulator of VEGF-R (KDR) signal transduction in vivo. Thus, down-regulation of caveolin-1 may be an important step along the pathway toward endothelial cell proliferation.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Angiogenesis is the development of new capillaries from pre-existing blood vessels (1). In the adult, angiogenesis is primarily associated with pathological conditions such as tumor formation and wound healing (2-4). With regard to tumor formation, angiogenesis is essential for the rapid and continued growth of a variety of tumors (5-7). This makes anti-angiogenic therapy an attractive and promising treatment for cancer (8).

Several different angiogenic activators have been described thus far (2-4). These include, but are not limited to, fibroblast growth factor (FGF),1 vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF; also known as scatter factor) (9). These growth factors bind and activate specific receptor tyrosine kinases within endothelial cells that are coupled to a variety of signal transduction pathways, most notably the Ras-p42/44 MAP kinase pathway (10, 11).

A number of endogenous angiogenesis inhibitors have been identified that antagonize the effects of VEGF and FGF. Angiogenesis inhibitors may be stored as inactive precursors within larger proteins and released upon appropriate proteolytic processing (12-16). A notable one is angiostatin, an ~38-40-kDa fragment of plasminogen (12, 13, 17). Others include endostatin (an ~18-kDa fragment of collagen XVIII), TGF-beta and thrombospondin-1 (14-16, 18-21).

Similarly, angiogenesis inhibitors derived from microbes (fumagillin, from Aspergillus fumigatus; minocycline, a tetracycline derivative) have been identified by a variety of screening approaches (22-26). Others are chemically synthesized compounds, such as 2-methoxyestradiol (an endogenous estrogen metabolite) and thalidomide (27-30). However, the mechanism of action of these anti-angiogenic agents remains largely unknown.

Here, we examine the effects of both angiogenesis activators and inhibitors on the expression of caveolin-1, a caveolae marker protein that is known to be abundantly expressed in normal endothelial cells in the adult (31). We find that angiogenesis activators and inhibitors differentially regulate the expression of caveolin-1. As caveolin-1 is thought to play a role as a negative regulator of signal transduction (31), down-regulation of caveolin-1 by angiogenic growth factors may be important for endothelial cell proliferation and subsequent angiogenesis.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- Monoclonal antibodies directed against caveolin-1 (clone 2297) and caveolin-2 (clone 65) were the gift of Drs. John R. Glenney, Jr. and Roberto Campos-Gonzalez (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY) (32, 33). Reagents and other supplies were obtained from the following sources: polyclonal anti-caveolin-1 IgG from Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA); rhodamine-goat anti-rabbit IgG from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc. (West Grove, PA); Slow-Fade anti-fade reagent from Molecular Probes, Inc. (Eugene, OR); HGF from Sigma; fumagillin, 2-methoxyestradiol, thalidomide, and PD98059 from Calbiochem; angiostatin from Angiogenesis Research Industries, Inc. (Chicago, IL); bFGF and TGF-beta from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY); VEGF from PeproTech EC Ltd. (Rocky Hill, NJ), and the bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit from Pierce. The cDNA for the human VEGF-R (KDR) was as described previously (34). The cDNA for mutationally activated MEK-1 is included as a positive control in the PathDetect Elk-1 trans-reporting system (Stratagene, Inc.).

Cell Culture and Treatment with Angiogenesis Activators and Inhibitors-- Human endothelial cells (ECV 304; CRL-1998) were grown in medium-199 (Life Technologies, Inc.) with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (normal growth medium). Endothelial cells were seeded at a density of ~1.0 × 104 cells/ml in 24-well plates. After incubation in normal growth medium overnight, the medium was replaced by medium-199 containing 5% fetal bovine serum.

Protein Analysis-- Expression of caveolin-1 and -2 was examined by Western blot analysis. Cells were solubilized with sample buffer containing 0.125 M Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 5% (w/v) SDS, 2.5% (v/v) beta -mercaptoethanol, 5% glycerol in double distilled water. After boiling for 4 min, proteins were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (5-15% gradient gels), transferred to nitrocellulose, and subjected to Western blot analysis using enhanced chemiluminescence. Prior to loading, the protein concentration of the samples was measured with the bicinchoninic acid method using bovine serum albumin as a standard.

Immunofluorescence Microscopy-- Briefly, cells were fixed with methanol at -20 °C for 10 min, blocked with 2% bovine serum albumin and stained with specific anti-peptide IgG directed against the unique N terminus of caveolin-1 (pAb N-20, directed against human caveolin-1 residues 2-21; Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Inc.) (35). Bound primary antibodies were detected using rhodamine-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG. The immunostained cells were mounted in the presence of Slow-Fade anti-fade reagent. Immunostaining was visualized using a Zeiss Axio-photofluorescence microscope.

Electron Microscopy-- Transmission electron microscopy was performed as described previously by our laboratory (36, 37).

In Vivo Assay for VEGF-R Signaling-- Coupling of the VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase (KDR) to the MAP kinase cascade was assessed using the PathDetect Elk trans-reporting system (Stratagene, Inc.). Briefly, confluent ECV 304 or Chinese hamster ovary cells were trypsinized and seeded at a density of ~8 × 104 cells/well for ECV 304 or 3 × 105 cells/well for Chinese hamster ovary in 6-well plates. After incubation overnight in growth medium, cells were transiently co-transfected with the following plasmids in various combinations, as indicated in a given experiment: pFR-luc (1 µg/well), pFA-Elk (0.1 µg/well), KDR (1 µg/well), caveolin-1 (1 µg/well), MEK-1 (0.1 µg/well), or pCB7 (1 µg/well) using the calcium/phosphate precipitation method (38, 39). 24 h post-transfection, cells were treated with or without angiogenesis inhibitors for an additional 20 h, as indicated in a given experiment. Finally, cells were lysed, and luciferase activity was measured as we described previously (38, 39).

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Angiogenesis Activators (VEGF, bFGF, and HGF) Down-regulate Caveolin-1 Expression-- ECV 304 cells are a well characterized human umbilical endothelial cell line (40-42). These cells express both caveolin-1 and -2, but fail to express caveolin-3, a muscle-specific caveolin protein (data not shown).

To evaluate the potential role of caveolins in angiogenesis, we studied the effect of angiogenesis activators (VEGF and bFGF) on caveolin expression in ECV 304 cells. In addition, we evaluated the effect of another growth factor (HGF, hepatocyte growth factor; scatter factor) that is known to activate the MET receptor tyrosine kinase and promote angiogenesis (9).

Fig. 1 shows the effects of these growth factors on caveolin expression. Treatment with VEGF, bFGF, or HGF all dramatically down-regulated the expression of the caveolin-1 protein (top panels). In striking contrast, the levels of the caveolin-2 protein remained essentially unaffected (bottom panels).


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Angiogenesis activators down-regulate caveolin-1 expression. ECV 304 cells (seeded at a density of 1 × 104 cells/ml) were treated with or without 10 ng/ml VEGF, bFGF, and HGF in medium-199 containing 5% fetal bovine serum for 24 h. The expression of caveolin-1 and -2 in these endothelial cells was determined by Western blot analysis using a panel of isoform-specific antibody probes that selectively recognize either caveolin-1 or caveolin-2. Each lane contains an equal amount of total protein.

As all three growth factors yielded similar results, we decide to focus our efforts on the effects of VEGF, a well characterized stimulator of angiogenesis. We next determined the time and concentration dependence of the effects of VEGF. Interestingly, VEGF-induced down-regulation of caveolin-1 appeared after only 8 h of treatment, exerting its maximal effects at 24 h (Fig. 2A). VEGF induced the down-regulation of caveolin-1 at a minimal concentration of 3 ng/ml, and the effect became maximal at 10 ng/ml (Fig. 2B). In contrast, caveolin-2 levels remained unaffected at every time and dose investigated.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   VEGF-induced down-regulation of caveolin-1 expression is time- and dose-dependent. ECV 304 cells were treated with 10 ng/ml VEGF for a period of up to 24 h (time course, panel A) or with 0-20 ng/ml VEGF for 24 h (concentration dependence, panel B). After the treatment, cells lysates were subjected to immunoblot analysis with isoform-specific antibodies that detect either caveolin-1 or caveolin-2. Each lane contains an equal amount of protein.

Angiogenesis Inhibitors Block VEGF-induced Down-regulation of Caveolin-1: Involvement of the p42/44 MAP Kinase Cascade-- Angiogenesis inhibitors exert their effects by antagonizing the effects of endothelial growth factors, such as VEGF. However, their mechanism of action remains largely unknown.

Fig. 3A shows the effects of a variety of well studied angiogenesis inhibitors (angiostatin, fumagillin, 2-methoxyestradiol, TGF-beta , and thalidomide) in combination with VEGF. In all cases examined, these angiogenesis inhibitors selectively blocked the ability of VEGF to induce the down-regulation of caveolin-1. Caveolin-2 levels are shown for comparison.


View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Angiogenesis inhibitors abolish VEGF-induced down-regulation of caveolin-1 expression. ECV 304 cells were treated with 10 ng/ml VEGF for 24 h in the presence or absence of angiostatin (5 µg/ml), fumagillin (0.2 µg/ml), 2-methoxyestradiol (0.5 µg/ml), TGF-beta (3 ng/ml), thalidomide (1 µg/ml), or PD98059 (20 µM). After treatment, the expression of caveolin-1 in these endothelial cells was monitored by immunoblot analysis (panel A) and immunofluorescence microscopy (panel B). The presence or absence of caveolae was monitored by transmission electron microscopy (panel C). In panel A, each lane contains an equal amount of protein. Panel B: a, control; b, VEGF alone; c, VEGF plus angiostatin; d, VEGF plus thalidomide; e, VEGF plus PD98059. Panel C: a, control (arrowheads point at caveolae); b, VEGF alone; c, VEGF plus thalidomide. Quantitation revealed that VEGF treatment reduced the number of caveolae organelles by ~20-25-fold. Bar = 100 nm.

The effects of these inhibitors were also analyzed by immunofluorescence microscopy (Fig. 3B). In untreated cells, caveolin-1 staining was abundant and localized primarily to the periphery of the cell. Growth factor stimulation using VEGF clearly down-regulated caveolin-1 immunostaining; similarly, we find that VEGF also induced the down-regulation of morphologically detectable caveolae as seen by transmission electron microscopy (Fig. 3C). Again, this down-regulation of caveolin-1 and caveolae organelles was prevented by treatment with angiogenesis inhibitors, such as angiostatin and thalidomide (Fig. 3, B and C).

Because caveolin-1 levels are down-regulated in Ras-transformed NIH 3T3 cells and can be restored to normal levels by inhibiting the p42/44 MAP kinase cascade, we next evaluated the effects of a well characterized MEK inhibitor, PD 98059. PD 98059 also blocked the ability of VEGF to down-regulate caveolin-1 expression, as seen by Western blotting (Fig. 3A) and immunofluorescence microscopy (Fig. 3B). Thus, inhibition of the p42/44 MAP kinase cascade by PD 98059 is sufficient to block growth factor-induced down-regulation of caveolin-1. Interestingly, several recent reports indicate that PD 98059 can function as an angiogenesis inhibitor (10, 11, 43, 44).

Angiogenesis Inhibitors Alone Do Not Affect Caveolin-1 Expression-- Next we tested the effects of the angiogenesis inhibitors alone on caveolin-1 expression (Fig. 4). Interestingly, in most cases, the angiogenesis inhibitors alone had little or no effect on caveolin-1 levels, with one exception. In the case of fumagillin, caveolin-1 levels were slightly down-regulated. We do not yet know the significance of this observation. Importantly, these results indicate that the angiogenesis inhibitors exert their effects on caveolin-1 expression primarily in response to endothelial growth factors stimulation via VEGF.


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Angiogenesis inhibitors alone do not affect caveolin-1 expression. ECV 304 cells were treated with or without angiostatin (5 µg/ml), fumagillin (0.2 µg/ml), 2-methoxyestradiol (0.5 µg/ml), TGF-beta (3 ng/ml), thalidomide (1 µg/ml), or PD98059 (20 µM). After the treatment, cells lysates were subjected to immunoblot analysis with isoform-specific antibodies that detect either caveolin-1 or caveolin-2. Each lane contains an equal amount of protein. Note that in most cases, the levels of caveolin-1 remain relatively constant with one exception (fumagillin).

Caveolin and VEGF-R Signal Transduction-- Caveolae have also been implicated in signaling through the p42/44 MAP kinase pathway. Morphological studies have directly shown that ERK-1/2 is concentrated in plasma membrane caveolae in vivo using immunoelectron microscopy (45). Evidence has been presented suggesting that other components of the p42/44 MAP kinase cascade are localized within caveolae membranes. These include receptor tyrosine kinases (EGF-R; PDGF-R; Ins-R) (35, 46-48), H-Ras (47, 49), Raf kinase (47), 14-3-3 proteins (48), ERK (37, 48), Shc (48), Grb-2 (48), mSos-1 (48), and Nck (48).

Recently, we examined the functional role of caveolins in regulating signaling along the MAP kinase cascade (39). Co-expression with caveolin-1 dramatically inhibited signaling from EGF-R, Raf, MEK-1, and ERK-2 to the nucleus in vivo (39). Using a variety of caveolin-1 deletion mutants, we mapped this in vivo inhibitory activity to caveolin-1 residues 32-95. In addition, peptides derived from this region of caveolin-1 (i.e. the caveolin-scaffolding domain) also inhibited the in vitro kinase activity of purified MEK-1 and ERK-2 (39). Thus, caveolin-1 can inhibit signal transduction from the p42/44 MAP kinase cascade both in vitro and in vivo by acting as a natural endogenous inhibitor of both MEK and ERK.

To assess whether caveolin-1 expression or angiogenesis inhibitors can negatively regulate signaling from the VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase (VEGF-R) along the MAP kinase cascade, we next used an established in vivo signal transduction assay that measures activation of the nuclear transcription factor, Elk-1. It is well known that transient overexpression of receptor tyrosine kinases is sufficient to cause receptor dimerization and signal transduction. Fig. 5, A and B, shows that co-expression of VEGF-R with caveolin-1 in either Chinese hamster ovary cells or ECV 304 cells significantly inhibits VEGF-R-induced signaling, as compared with empty vector alone (pCB7). Similarly, we find that co-expression of activated MEK-1 with caveolin-1 in ECV 304 cells dramatically inhibits MEK-induced activation of Elk-1 (Fig. 5C).


View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Effects of caveolin-1 and angiogenesis inhibitors on VEGF-R-induced signaling to the nuclear transcription factor, Elk-1. VEGF-R signaling causes activation of p42/44 MAP kinases (ERK 1/2), which translocate to the nucleus and activate the transcription factor Elk. We measured VEGF-R (KDR) induced signaling using a luciferase-based reporter system that reflects the activation state of Elk-1 (see "Experimental Procedures"). Chinese hamster ovary cells (panel A) or ECV 304 cells (panels B, C, and D) were transiently transfected with a plasmid encoding either VEGF-R (KDR) (panels A and B) or mutationally activated MEK-1 (panel C). In addition, these cells were co-transfected with a plasmid encoding wild-type full-length caveolin-1 (pCB7-Cav-1) or with empty vector alone (pCB7) as a negative control. Note that co-transfection with caveolin-1 significantly inhibited VEGF-R-induced and MEK-1-induced signaling. In panel D, ECV 304 cells were transfected with VEGF-R (KDR) and incubated in the presence or absence of a variety of angiogenesis inhibitors for an additional 20 h (detailed in the legend of Fig. 4). Note that treatment of ECV 304 cells with either PD98059 or thalidomide substantially reduced VEGF-R-induced signaling, whereas treatment with angiostatin or fumagillin had little or no effect. Data are the mean ± S.D.

Treatment of ECV 304 cells with either the well characterized MEK inhibitor, PD98059, or thalidomide substantially reduced VEGF-R induced signaling, suggesting that thalidomide affects VEGF-R induced angiogenesis, at least in part, through inhibiting the p42/44 MAP kinase pathway (Fig. 5D). In contrast, treatment with angiostatin or fumagillin had little or no effect on VEGF-R-induced activation of Elk-1, suggesting that their effects are independent of the p42/44 MAP kinase cascade. These observations are consistent with a recent report that demonstrated that the actions of angiostatin are independent of the p42/44 MAP kinase cascade (50).

Our current observations with angiogenesis activators and inhibitors may be related to the ability of caveolin-1 to positively regulate contact inhibition and growth arrest in normal cells (51). We have previously shown (51) that caveolin-1 expression levels are down-regulated in rapidly dividing NIH 3T3 cells and are dramatically up-regulated at confluency. These results suggest that up-regulation of caveolin-1 expression levels may be important to mediate normal contact inhibition and to negatively regulate the activation state of the p42/44 MAP kinase cascade and other signaling pathways (51). In support of these findings, it has been shown that caveolins are most abundantly expressed in terminally differentiated cells such as endothelial cells, adipocytes, and muscle cells and are dramatically up-regulated during adipogenesis and myotube formation (33, 52-54). Thus, down-regulation of caveolin-1 expression and caveolae organelles may be a prerequisite for endothelial cell proliferation and, therefore, angiogenesis.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by a National Institutes of Health Grant R01-CA-80250 from the NCI, grants from the Charles E. Culpeper Foundation, the G. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers Charitable Foundation, and the Sidney Kimmel Foundation for Cancer Research (to M.P.L.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Supported by a National Institutes of Health Medical Scientist Training Program Grant T32-GM07288.

parallel Supported by National Institutes of Health Grants R01-HL-47032 and HL51043.

Dagger Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular Pharmacology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave., Bronx, NY 10461. Tel.: 718-430-8828; Fax: 718-430-8830; E-mail: lisanti{at}aecom.yu.edu.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: FGF, fibroblast growth factor; bFGF, basic FGF; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; VEGF-R, VEGF receptor; MAP kinase, mitogen-activated protein kinase; TGF-beta , transforming growth factor-beta ; HGF, hepatocyte growth factor; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase, MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
  1. Bussolino, F., Mantovani, A., and Persico, G. (1997) Trends Biochem. Sci. 22, 251-256[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Saphir, A. (1997) J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 89, 1658-1659[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Bicknell, R., and Harris, A. L. (1996) Curr. Opin. Oncol. 8, 60-65[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Zetter, B. R. (1998) Annu. Rev. Med. 49, 407-424[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Folkman, J. (1995) Nat. Med. 1, 27-31[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Fidler, I. J., and Ellis, L. M. (1994) Cell 79, 185-188[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Bicknell, R. (1994) Ann. Oncol. 5 Suppl 4, 45-50[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Battegay, E. J. (1995) J. Mol. Med. 73, 333-346[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Rosen, E. M., Lamszus, K., Laterra, J., Polverini, P. J., Rubin, J. S., and Goldberg, I. D. (1997) CIBA Found. Symp. 212, 215-226[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Eliceiri, B. P., Klemke, R., Stromblad, S., and Cheresh, D. A. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 140, 1255-1263[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Jones, M. K., Sarfeh, I. J., and Tarnawski, A. S. (1998) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 249, 118-123[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Gately, S., Twardowski, P., Stack, M. S., Cundiff, D. L., Grella, D., Castellino, F. J., Enghild, J., Kwaan, H. C., Lee, F., Kramer, R. A., Volpert, O., Bouck, N., and Soff, G. A. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 10868-10872[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Stathakis, P., Fitzgerald, M., Matthias, L. J., Chesterman, C. N., and Hogg, P. J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 20641-20645[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Standker, L., Schrader, M., Kanse, S. M., Jurgens, M., Forssmann, W. G., and Preissner, K. T. (1997) FEBS Lett. 420, 129-133[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Sasaki, T., Fukai, N., Mann, K., Göhring, W., Olsen, B. R., and Timpl, R. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 4249-4256[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Good, D. J., Polverini, P. J., Rastinejad, F., Le Beau, M. M., Lemons, R. S., Frazier, W. A., and Bouck, N. P. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 6624-6628[Abstract]
  17. O'Reilly, M. S., Holmgren, L., Chen, C., and Folkman, J. (1996) Nat. Med. 2, 689-692[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. O'Reilly, M. S., Boehm, T., Shing, Y., Fukai, N., Vasios, G., Lane, W. S., Flynn, E., Birkhead, J. R., Olsen, B. R., and Folkman, J. (1997) Cell 88, 277-285[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Iruela-Arispe, M. L., Bornstein, P., and Sage, H. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 5026-5030[Abstract]
  20. Muller, G., Behrens, J., Nussbaumer, U., Bohlen, P., and Birchmeier, W. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 844, 5600-5604
  21. Baird, A., and Durkin, T. (1986) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 138, 476-482[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Ingber, D., Fujita, T., Kishimoto, S., Sudo, K., Kanamaru, T., Brem, H., and Folkman, J. (1990) Nature 348, 555-557[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Yamaoka, M., Yamamoto, T., Masaki, T., Ikeyama, S., Sudo, K., and Fujita, T. (1993) Cancer Res. 53, 4262-4267[Abstract]
  24. Kalebic, T., Tsokos, M., and Helman, L. J. (1996) Int. J. Cancer 68, 596-599[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Tamargo, R. J., Bok, R. A., and Brem, H. (1991) Cancer Res. 51, 672-675[Abstract]
  26. Guerin, C., Laterra, J., Masnyk, T., Golub, L. M., and Brem, H. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 188, 740-745[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Fotsis, T., Zhang, Y., Pepper, M. S., Adlercreutz, H., Montesano, R., Nawroth, P. P., and Schweigerer, L. (1994) Nature 368, 237-239[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Yue, T. L., Wang, X., Louden, C. S., Gupta, S., Pillarisetti, K., Gu, J. L., Hart, T. K., Lysko, P. G., and Feuerstein, G. Z. (1997) Mol. Pharmacol. 51, 951-962[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Kenyon, B. M., Browne, F., and D'Amato, R. J. (1997) Exp. Eye Res. 64, 971-978[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. D'Amato, R. J., Loughnan, M. S., Flynn, E., and Folkman, J. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 4082-4085[Abstract]
  31. Okamoto, T., Schlegel, A., Scherer, P. E., and Lisanti, M. P. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 5419-5422[Free Full Text]
  32. Scherer, P. E., Tang, Z., Chun, M., Sargiacomo, M., Lodish, H. F., and Lisanti, M. P. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 16395-16401[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Scherer, P. E., Lewis, R. Y., Volonte, D., Engelman, J. A., Galbiati, F., Couet, J., Kohtz, D. S., van Donselaar, E., Peters, P., and Lisanti, M. P. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 29337-29346[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Terman, B. I., Carrion, M. E., Kovacs, E., Rasmussen, B. A., Eddy, R. L., and Shows, T. B. (1991) Oncogene 6, 1677-1683[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Liu, J., Oh, P., Horner, T., Rogers, R. A., and Schnitzer, J. E. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 7211-7222[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Sargiacomo, M., Sudol, M., Tang, Z.-L., and Lisanti, M. P. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 122, 789-807[Abstract]
  37. Lisanti, M. P., Scherer, P. E., Vidugiriene, J., Tang, Z.-L., HermanoskiVosatka, A., Tu, Y.-H., Cook, R. F., and Sargiacomo, M. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 126, 111-126[Abstract]
  38. Engelman, J. A., Lee, R. J., Karnezis, A., Bearss, D. J., Webster, M., Siegel, P., Muller, W. J., Windle, J. J., Pestell, R. G., and Lisanti, M. P. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 20448-20455[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Engelman, J. A., Chu, C., Lin, A., Jo, H., Ikezu, T., Okamoto, T., Kohtz, D. S., and Lisanti, M. P. (1998) FEBS Lett. 428, 205-211[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Takahashi, K., Sawasaki, Y., Hata, J., Mukai, K., and Goto, T. (1990) In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. 26, 265-274[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Takahashi, K., and Sawasaki, Y. (1991) In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 27A, 766-768
  42. Takahasi, K., and Sawasaki, Y. (1992) In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 28A, 380-382
  43. Kevil, C. G., Payne, D. K., Mire, E., and Alexander, J. S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 15099-15103[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Kroll, J., and Waltenberger, J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 32521-32527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Liu, P., Ying, Y. S., and Anderson, R. G. W. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., U. S. A. 94, 13666-13670[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Smart, E. J., Ying, Y., Mineo, C., and Anderson, R. G. W. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., U. S. A. 92, 10104-10108[Abstract]
  47. Mineo, C., James, G. L., Smart, E. J., and Anderson, R. G. W. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 11930-11935[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Liu, P., Ying, Y., Ko, Y.-G., and Anderson, R. G. W. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 10299-10303[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Song, K. S., Li, S., Okamoto, T., Quilliam, L. A., Sargiacomo, M., and Lisanti, M. P. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 9690-9697[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Claesson-Welsh, L., Welsh, M., Ito, N., Anand-Apte, B., Soker, S., Zetter, B., O'Reilly, M., and Folkman, J. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 5579-5583[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Galbiati, F., Volonte', D., Watanabe, G., Burk, R., Pestell, R. G., and Lisanti, M. P. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 6633-6648[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Tang, Z., Scherer, P. E., Okamoto, T., Song, K., Chu, C., Kohtz, D. S., Nishimoto, I., Lodish, H. F., and Lisanti, M. P. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 2255-2261[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Song, K. S., Scherer, P. E., Tang, Z., Okamoto, T., Li, S., Chafel, M., Chu, C., Kohtz, D. S., and Lisanti, M. P. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 15160-15165[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Way, M., and Parton, R. (1995) FEBS Lett. 376, 108-112[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.