Generation of Artificial Proteoglycans Containing Glycosaminoglycan-modified CD44
DEMONSTRATION OF THE INTERACTION BETWEEN RANTES AND CHONDROITIN SULFATE*

Edith A. WolffDagger , Brad Greenfield, Dennis D. Taub§, William J. Murphy, Kelly L. Bennett, and Alejandro Aruffo

From the Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Princeton, New Jersey 08543, the § Clinical Immunology Section, NIA, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21224, and the  NCI-Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, Maryland 21702

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
References

All CD44 isoforms are modified with chondroitin sulfate (CS), while only those containing variably spliced exon V3 are modified with both CS and heparan sulfate (HS). The CS is added to a serine-glycine (SG) site in CD44 exon E5, while HS and CS are added to the SGSG site in exon V3. Site-directed mutagenesis and other molecular biology techniques were used to determine the minimal motifs responsible for the addition of CS and HS to CD44 (see accompanying paper (Greenfield, B., Wang, W.-C., Marquardt, H., Piepkorn, M., Wolff, E. A., Aruffo, A., and Bennett, K. L. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 2511-2517)). We have used this information to generate artificial proteoglycans containing the extracellular domain of the cell adhesion protein lymphocyte function-associated antigen-3 (LFA-3) (CD58) and CD44 motifs modified with CS or a combination of CS and HS. Analysis of the CD44-modified LFA-3 protein showed that it retains the ability to engage and trigger the function of its natural ligand CD2, resulting in T cell activation. In addition, the glycosaminoglycan-modified artificial proteoglycan is capable of binding the chemokine RANTES (regulated upon activation, normally T cell expressed and secreted) and delivering it to human T cells, resulting in enhanced T cell activation. These data demonstrate that artificial proteoglycans can be engineered with functional domains that have enhanced activity by codelivering glycosaminoglycan-binding molecules. The artificial proteoglycans were also used as a model system to explore the glycosaminoglycan binding properties of basic-fibroblast growth factor and the chemokine RANTES. While basic-fibroblast growth factor was shown to bind HS alone, this model revealed that RANTES binds not only HS, as has been demonstrated in the past, but also CS. Thus, artificial proteoglycans can be used for studying the glycosaminoglycan binding patterns of growth factors and chemokines and provide a means to manipulate the levels, types, and activity of glycosaminoglycan-binding proteins in vitro and in vivo.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
References

CD44 is a widely distributed type I membrane protein that binds hyaluronan, other extracellular matrix components, and osteopontin (1-6). The interactions between CD44 and its ligands have been shown to participate in cell migration and activation (7-12). The exons encoding the CD44 gene can be variably spliced to give rise to multiple protein isoforms (13-15). Expression of these CD44 isoforms can be tissue-specific, developmentally regulated, and/or regulated by cell activation. Most of these isoforms arise from the variable splicing of exons encoding polypeptide fragments located in the extracellular region of CD44, downstream of the hyaluronan binding domain (16). The function of these variably spliced domains is largely unexplored; however, a number of interesting observations have been made. For example, it has been shown in a rat model of tumor metastasis, that a previously nonmetastatic cell line can be rendered aggressively metastatic following the overexpression of CD44 variants containing variably spliced exon V6 (17, 18). It has also been shown that changes in the pattern of glycosylation of CD44 resulting from the addition of variably spliced exons, which are modified extensively with O-linked carbohydrates, can modulate the hyaluronan binding activity of CD44 (19, 20). In addition, different CD44 isoforms are modified with different glycosaminoglycan (GAG)1 polymers, including HS (21). The important role proteoglycans play in regulating the function of HS-binding growth factors and chemokines is being studied (22-25), and it has been proposed that HS-modified CD44 isoforms may play a role in the binding and presentation of HS-binding chemokines (26).

We and others had reported previously that CD44 isoforms containing variably spliced exon V3 are modified with HS (21, 27, 28). These studies were extended to show that the HS is added to the SGSG motif in CD44 exon V3. This site can also be modified with CS. We showed that CS is added to at least one of the SG motifs located in CD44 exon E5. In addition, we identified sequences in exon V3 required for HS assembly (see accompanying paper (46)). HS assembly was supported in exon E5 when eight amino acids from exon V3 were inserted into exon E5. This ability to introduce a HS assembly site into a protein led to the idea that recombinant artificial proteoglycans could be created to deliver heparin-binding proteins to sites of interest.

We generated such artificial proteoglycans and used a model of T cell costimulation to analyze their activity. T cells are activated through the T cell receptor by foreign antigens presented by antigen presenting cells in the context of major histocompatibility complex. However, this signal alone is not sufficient to induce a proliferative activation response. Accessory molecules expressed on the surface of T cells (such as CD2) provide a requisite second signal (costimulation signal) by binding to their respective ligands on antigen presenting cells, resulting in T cell activation and proliferation (29, 30). The T cell molecule CD2 binds to lymphocyte function-associated antigen-3 (LFA-3), which is expressed on antigen presenting cells, including B cells, memory T cells, monocytes, and dendritic cells. The combination of an antigen binding to the T cell receptor and ligation of LFA-3 to CD2 on the T cell surface results in costimulation and subsequent proliferation of T cells. The stimulation of T cells can also be augmented by the presence of growth factors or chemokines (31, 32).

We designed a recombinant artificial proteoglycan with dual costimulatory activity. The dual activity stems from LFA-3 (which binds CD2 on T cells) and from GAG-modified CD44 exon V3 (which binds growth factors and chemokines). This artificial proteoglycan provides a system to study the interaction of growth factors and chemokines with GAGs and ultimately can be used as a means of directing the levels and types of chemokines and growth factors to induce a particular physiological effect. In this manuscript, we characterize the functional domains of this artificial proteoglycan and use it as a test system to extend our knowledge regarding the GAG binding characteristics of the chemokine RANTES. In addition, we demonstrate the in vitro activity of the artificial proteoglycan in a model of T cell activation.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

Construction of LFA-3 Artificial Proteoglycan Expression Vectors-- The LFA-3-Rg construct has been described previously (29). Oligonucleotide primers used for inserting the CD44 V3 eight-amino acid motif (see accompanying paper (46)) after the Ser-Gly present in the extracellular domain of LFA-3 were: LFA-3-FP-HindIII, AAGCTTCGACGAGCCATGGTTGCT; LFA-3-RP8aa-BamHI, GGGATCCCCGATAAAATCTTCATCATCATCAATACCGCTGCTTGGGATACAGGT. Polymerase chain reaction product was digested with HindIII and BamHI (Boehringer Mannheim), gel-purified, and ligated into a mammalian expression vector containing the sequence for an immunoglobulin constant region (Rg) as described in the accompanying paper (46).

For constructing LFA-3 extracellular domain with complete CD44 V3 domains, primers used were LFA-3-FP-HindIII and LFA-3-RP-SpeI ACTAGTTCTGTGTCTTGAATGACCGCT. Polymerase chain reaction products were digested with HindIII and SpeI (Boehringer Mannheim), gel-purified, and ligated into HindIII and SpeI (Boehringer Mannheim) cut V3wt-Rg or V3E5/8aa-Rg expression vectors described in the accompanying paper (46).

Metabolic Labeling and Enzymatic Digestion-- COS cells were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) with 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin (100 units/ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml), and 2 mM L-glutamine. The Rg fusion proteins were produced in COS cells, radiolabeled with [35S]NaHSO4 (NEN Life Science Products), and purified from culture supernatants using protein A-Sepharose (Repligen, Cambridge, MA) as described previously (28). The labeled protein was divided into four aliquots. One aliquot was left untreated, and the others were digested for 1 h at 37 °C with 50 milliunits of Proteus vulgaris chondroitin ABC lyase, 2 milliunits of Flavobacterium heparinum heparitinase (ICN Immunobiologicals, Costa Mesa, CA), or both enzymes. Samples were washed in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween 20, heated for 10 min at 95 °C in sample buffer containing SDS with beta -mercaptoethanol, and analyzed on 8-16% Tris/glycine SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gels (Novex, San Diego, CA). Gels were fixed, soaked in Amplify solution (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), dried, and then analyzed using a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).

Binding ELISAs-- Immulon II 96-well microtiter plates (Dynatech Laboratories, Alexandria, VA) were coated with LFA-3/V3wt-Rg or LFA-3-Rg at a concentration of 10 µg/ml in carbonate/bicarbonate buffer (see above) overnight at 4 °C. All subsequent steps were performed at room temperature. The plates were washed three times and blocked with 2% bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline for 1 h. Recombinant human b-FGF or RANTES (R & D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) was added to the wells at the concentrations indicated under "Results" and incubated for 1 h. Goat anti-sera specific for b-FGF or RANTES (R & D Systems) at 1 µg/ml was incubated for 1 h, followed by donkey anti-goat IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) at 1:10,000 for 1 h. Chromogen-Substrate solution (Genetic Systems Corp., Seattle, WA) was added to the wells for 15 min. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 1.0 N H2SO4, and the ratio of the absorbance at 450-630 nm was read. Inhibition of b-FGF or RANTES binding was tested by treating LFA-3/V3wt-Rg-coated wells with heparitinase or chondroitin ABC lyase (ICN) at concentrations of 0.07 unit/ml and 3.3 units/ml, respectively (in phosphate-buffered saline containing 50 mM NaOAc and 1 mM CaCl2, pH 7.8), 1 h at 43 °C, before proceeding with the assay as described above. Results are expressed as the mean value of triplicate wells ± S.D.

Costimulation Assays with Th1 and Th2 Clones-- The tetanus toxoid-reactive human T cell (Th1) clone, H1.2, and the Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus-reactive human T cell (Th2) clone, 2DP.21, were tested for their ability to proliferate in the presence of recombinant human RANTES (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ) in the presence or absence of immobilized anti-CD3 mAb and/or LFA-3/V3wt-Rg or LFA-3-Rg alone (31). These clones have been shown previously to be chemokine-reactive by their ability to induce migration and facilitate adhesion to endothelial cells and extracellular matrix proteins.2 These clones were stimulated at 2-week intervals with either tetanus toxoid (10 µg/ml) or D. pteronyssinus (1:100 dilution), and autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells (irradiated at 1500 rads) were added to the culture as feeder cells. The T cell clones were only utilized in proliferation studies upon resting and were found to be free of contaminating feeder cells. Ninety-six well microtiter plates were coated 24 h in advance with either control mouse IgG or anti-CD3 mAb (10 µg/ml) in the presence or absence of LFA-3/V3wt-Rg or LFA-3-Rg (10 µg/ml) in carbonate-bicarbonate buffer, pH 8.9. After incubation, the plates were blocked by adding 200 µl of culture medium to each well and then incubating the plates for an additional 2 h at 37 °C. Again, after incubation, the plates were gently washed (four times) with culture medium until the pH was approximately 7.2. Recombinant human RANTES diluted in culture medium was then added to the coated plates and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. (The C-C chemokine, RANTES, was purchased from PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ. Endotoxin levels were performed on each lot of chemokine used in these studies using a Limulus Lysate assay and were found to possess <0.1 ng of lipopolysaccharide/ml of chemokine.) Control wells containing culture medium in place of RANTES were incubated in the same manner. The plates were then gently washed with culture medium. Purified human T cell clones were placed at 2 × 104 cells/well on the coated plates and then incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. After incubation, the plates were pulsed with 1 µCi of [3H]thymidine for an additional 18-24 h. The plates were then harvested and counted on a liquid scintillation counter. The results are expressed as the mean number of counts/min ± S.D. All of the costimulation experiments were performed blinded.

    RESULTS

Generation of Artificial Proteoglycans Modified with HS and CS-- Proteoglycans such as CD44 capture, concentrate, and present GAG-binding proteins, including growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines, to specialized receptors. Via this mechanism, proteoglycans play a key role in regulating the activity of these GAG-binding proteins. Therefore, the ability to generate artificial proteoglycans would result in a novel class of recombinant proteins, which could be used to direct the activity of GAG-binding proteins in vitro and in vivo.

In the accompanying paper (46), we demonstrated that a Rg fusion protein containing CD44 exon V3 supports CS and HS assembly and that the proteoglycan is able to bind b-FGF. We also showed that CD44 exon E5 only supports CS assembly. In addition, it was shown that the GAG assembly specificity of exon V3 and E5 could be manipulated by exchanging the eight amino acids that followed the SGSG sequence in CD44 exon V3 with the eight amino acids that followed the first SG sequence in exon E5. Using the knowledge of the sequence requirement that determines the specificity of GAG assembly, we decided to test whether we could generate artificial proteoglycans with a GAG-modified CD44 motif for delivering growth factors and chemokines.

We initiated our investigation on the preparation of artificial proteoglycans by generating an LFA-3 (CD58) recombinant fusion protein. LFA-3 was chosen for two reasons: first, it is a very well characterized single chain type I membrane protein; and second, it is a ligand for the T cell antigen CD2 and has an easily measurable costimulatory activity. The binding of a monoclonal antibody directed to CD3 (which is complexed with the T cell receptor) mimics antigen binding in the context of major histocompatibility complex to the T cell surface and induces proliferation of the T cells. This, in combination with the ligation of LFA-3 to CD2, results in costimulation and enhanced proliferation of T cells (29). The chemokine RANTES is also capable of providing a costimulatory signal in combination with anti-CD3 antibody, which results in enhanced T cell proliferation (31). The interactions between these T cell signaling molecules and their natural ligands are represented in Fig. 1A. A model of the corresponding signaling pathways, which could be activated by an artificial proteoglycan consisting of LFA-3 combined with GAG-modified CD44 (indicated by V3wt), is shown in Fig. 1B.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   T cell costimulation signals enhanced by chemokine presentation. A, antigens presented in the context of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) provide a stimulatory signal by binding to the T cell receptor (TCR)-CD3 complex. The binding of LFA-3 to CD2 provides a second, costimulatory signal. Proteoglycans (PG) containing heparan sulfate (solid line) and/or chondroitin sulfate (dashd line) concentrate and present growth factors or chemokines (bullet ) to their cell surface receptors (CR), providing a costimulatory signal to the T cell. B, the binding of a monoclonal antibody to CD3 (complexed with the T cell receptor) in vitro mimics antigen binding on the T cell surface in vivo. An artificial proteoglycan consisting of LFA-3 and GAG-modified CD44 (V3wt) provides two costimulatory signals by binding CD2 while concentrating and presenting chemokines or growth factors via heparan sulfate or chondroitin sulfate to cell surface receptors.

To generate a GAG-modified LFA-3 Rg fusion protein, the sequence coding for CD44 exon V3 (wild type) was placed between the LFA-3 extracellular domain and the Rg domain, thereby creating LFA-3/V3wt-Rg (Fig. 2). Analysis of the GAG modification on LFA-3/V3wt-Rg is shown in Fig. 3, left panel. Digestion with a combination of heparitinase and chondroitin ABC lyase is required for GAG removal (apparent molecular mass 100-220 kDa), indicating that this proteoglycan is modified with both CS and HS. Retention of a small amount of the radiolabel is observed and is due to keratan sulfate and possibly other oligosaccharide modification of the CD44 (33).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Recombinant artificial proteoglycans. Line drawing of LFA-3-Rg and VCAM-1-Rg fusion proteins containing wild type CD44 exon V3 (V3wt) or CD44 exon V3 containing the eight amino acids found downstream of the first SG site in exon E5 (V3E5/8aa). Boxes representing LFA-3, VCAM-1, CD44, and immunoglobulin constant region domains are labeled.


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Left panel, the chimeric LFA-3 protein containing CD44 exon V3 is modified with CS and HS. Right panel, the LFA-3 protein containing CD44 mutant V3 exon, V3E5/8aa, is modified with CS. [35S]NaHSO4-labeled LFA-3/V3wt-Rg or LFA-3/V3E5/8aa-Rg protein was recovered from the supernatant of COS cell transfectants, purified, and divided equally into four aliquots. One aliquot was left untreated, and the others were digested for 1 h with heparitinase, chondroitin ABC lyase, or with both enzymes. The proteins were then resolved by SDS- polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and analyzed by radiography.

Next we explored the possibility of generating an artificial proteoglycan, which was modified with CS but not HS. This was done by constructing a chimeric gene containing a sequence encoding the CD44 V3 exon with the eight amino acids derived from CD44 exon E5, which is modified with only CS (V3E5/8aa, see accompanying paper (46)). The resulting fusion protein, LFA-3/V3E5/8aa-Rg (Fig. 2), is modified exclusively with CS (Fig. 3, right panel). These findings demonstrate that inclusion of the CD44 derived V3E5/8aa domain results in a CS-modified proteoglycan.

Basic-FGF Binds HS, while RANTES Binds Both CS and HS-- We further analyzed the activity of the GAG-modified LFA-3 artificial proteogycan by studying its ability to bind growth factors and chemokines. The binding activities of various growth factors and chemokines to heparin and heparan sulfate have been explored extensively (22, 25, 34-36). In particular, the binding of RANTES to intact extracellular matrix has been shown to be mediated by HS (37). The ability of b-FGF and RANTES to bind the artificial proteoglycan LFA-3/V3wt-Rg (modified with HS and CS) or an LFA-3-Rg control (not modified with HS or CS) was examined by ELISA. As shown in Fig. 4A, b-FGF binds to LFA-3/V3wt-Rg in a concentration-dependent manner and does not bind to LFA-3-Rg. The binding to LFA-3/V3wt-Rg is abolished by pretreatment with heparitinase but not chondroitin ABC lyase (Fig. 4B), indicating the binding of b-FGF is mediated by HS and not CS.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   GAG-modified LFA-3 interacts with growth factors. A, ELISA binding activity of b-FGF to recombinant proteoglycan. B-FGF binds to GAG-modified LFA-3/V3wt-Rg () but not LFA-3-Rg (bullet ). Binding was detected using goat anti-serum specific for b-FGF, followed by donkey anti-goat IgG HRP. B, analysis of b-FGF binding to enzyme-treated recombinant proteoglycan. B-FGF binding to LFA-3/V3wt-Rg treated with heparitinase (black-square), chondroitin ABC lyase (open circle ), or untreated () was compared by ELISA.

The chemokine RANTES was also tested for binding to the artificial proteoglycans. Like b-FGF, RANTES shows binding to LFA-3/V3wt-Rg and not to LFA-3-Rg (Fig. 5A). However, a different and unexpected pattern of binding emerged when RANTES was tested with enzyme-treated LFA-3/V3wt-Rg. Neither heparitinase nor chondroitin ABC lyase treatment alone reduces RANTES binding; however, a combination of the two enzymes eliminates binding to the GAG-modified protein (Fig. 5B). These results indicate that while b-FGF binds only HS-modified CD44, RANTES is capable of binding both CS- and HS-modified CD44.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   A, GAG-modified LFA-3 interacts with chemokines. The binding activity of RANTES to recombinant proteoglycan was measured by ELISA. RANTES binds to GAG-modified LFA-3/V3wt-Rg () but not LFA-3-Rg (bullet ). B, analysis of RANTES binding to enzyme-treated recombinant proteoglycan. The binding activity of RANTES to LFA-3/V3wt-Rg treated with heparitinase(black-square), chondroitin ABC lyase (open circle ), both enzymes (bullet ), or untreated () was compared by ELISA.

The LFA-3 Domain of the Artificial Proteoglycan Is Active-- The binding of a monoclonal antibody directed to CD3 (which is complexed with the T cell receptor) mimics antigen binding on the T cell surface, and in combination with the ligation of LFA-3 to CD2, results in costimulation and subsequent proliferation of the T cells (29). This experimental model was used to test whether inclusion of the CD44-V3 domain and its GAG modification altered the CD2 binding and costimulatory properties of LFA-3. The ability of LFA-3/V3wt-Rg to drive Th1 and Th2 cell proliferation in the presence of anti-CD3 mAb showed that inclusion of the CD44-derived sequences and GAG modification does not affect the ability of the LFA-3 moiety to bind CD2 and engage its costimulatory function (Fig. 6).


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   GAG-modified LFA-3 in combination with anti-CD3 mAb induces proliferation of human T cell clones. Human Th1 and Th2 clones were incubated on plates coated with LFA-3/V3wt-Rg (white columns), anti-CD3 mAb (black columns), or a combination of both LFA-3/V3wt-Rg and anti-CD3 mAb (gray columns). Cell proliferation was measured by [3H]thymidine uptake.

The above experiments demonstrate that a recombinant artificial proteoglycan can be generated with two independent functional domains. Next we tested whether the two domains can act in concert to enhance a biological activity.

Delivery of RANTES with Artificial Proteoglycan LFA-3/V3wt-Rg Enhances LFA-3/CD3 T Cell Proliferation of Human Th1 and Th2 Cell Clones-- Studies have demonstrated that soluble chemokines exert a costimulatory effect on T cell activation and proliferation if added in combination with the proper T cell stimulus (31). For example, the chemokine RANTES is capable of stimulating human T cell proliferation in the presence of anti-CD3 mAb. To further test the artificial proteoglycan, we examined the costimulatory effects of RANTES bound to LFA-3/V3wt-Rg on Th1 or Th2 cell clones using plates coated with anti-CD3 mAb and either LFA-3/V3wt-Rg or LFA-3-Rg. The cultures were examined 72 h later to assess effects on cell proliferation. In these studies, RANTES was incubated for 2 h on precoated plates and then washed to remove nonbound chemokine before adding T cell clones. Thus, the responses observed in these studies are only examining the presentation of RANTES by the ligands bound to the plate. Parallel samples with and without RANTES were tested, and the difference in signal given by the samples with RANTES over that of the corresponding controls without RANTES is shown in Fig. 7. These results demonstrate that the chemokine RANTES induces an increase in proliferation in response to immobilized LFA-3/V3wt-Rg and anti-CD3 mAb, as compared with LFA-3-Rg and anti-CD3 mAb. These data show that it is possible to make artificial proteoglycans with multiple functional domains and that their activity is enhanced by codelivering biologically active GAG binding molecules.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Delivery of RANTES with the artificial proteoglycan LFA-3/V3wt-Rg enhances T cell proliferation of Th1 and Th2 clones stimulated with anti-CD3 mAb and LFA-3. Plates coated with LFA-3-Rg (black columns), LFA-3/V3wt-Rg (gray columns), anti-CD3 mAb + LFA-3-Rg (hatched columns), or anti-CD3 mAb + LFA-3/V3wt-Rg (white columns) were preincubated with RANTES at 1 µg/ml before adding human Th1 and Th2 cell clones. In the presence of anti-CD3 mAb, delivery of RANTES with LFA-3/V3wt-Rg induced greater proliferation than that observed with LFA-3-Rg. Cell proliferation was measured by [3H]thymidine uptake.


    DISCUSSION

In the accompanying paper (46), we showed that a recombinant form of CD44 exon V3 alone could be expressed as a HS- and CS-modified proteoglycan. In contrast, a mutant form of this exon, in which the eight residues located downstream of the SGSG site were replaced with those located downstream of the first SG site in exon E5 (V3E5/8aa), was modified with only CS. These observations led us to examine whether we could generate artificial proteoglycans containing both CS and HS or CS only. We designed artificial proteoglycans by preparing chimeric proteins containing CD44 exon V3, which would be modified with HS and CS, or proteins containing the mutant CD44 exon V3E5/8aa, which would be modified with only CS.

The LFA-3/V3wt-Rg and LFA-3/V3E5/8aa-Rg constructs reported in this study provide examples of these artificial proteoglycans. In these examples, the chimeric protein has three functional domains. The amino-terminal domain is a receptor-targeting domain, LFA-3, which binds to CD2. The second domain contains the GAG polymer (either HS and CS in the V3wt-containing protein or CS in the V3E5/8aa-containing protein). The third domain is an immunoglobulin constant region, which binds to molecules known to interact with the constant region of human IgG1. We were concerned that the inclusion of the GAG-modified domain would perturb the function of the other polypeptides in the chimera, and thus we examined in detail the functional properties of each of the domains of LFA-3/V3wt-Rg. All of the domains of this artificial proteoglycan function as expected. The CD44-V3 domain is modified with HS and CS and is capable of binding b-FGF and RANTES. The LFA-3 domain is capable of engaging CD2 and triggering a costimulatory signal, and the immunoglobulin domain binds anti-IgG1 antibodies and protein A (allowing for a simple method of purification).

The generation of artificial proteoglycans provided a system for studying the binding of growth factors and chemokines to GAGs and led us to the finding that the chemokine RANTES binds CS. The ability of RANTES to bind CS has broad implications with respect to the identity of proteoglycans responsible for chemokine presentation. Chemokines participate in the regulation of immune responses by acting as chemoattractants and activators of leukocytes. The recruitment of leukocytes to sites of inflammation requires the formation and maintenance of chemokine gradients, which are achieved by the interaction of chemokines with proteoglycans. The capture of chemokines by endothelial proteoglycans provides the mechanism to concentrate and present chemokines in biologically active form to the signaling receptors of passing leukocytes (22, 24, 25, 38). One of the proteoglycans proposed to participate in this process is CD44. The standard CD44 isoform (CD44H) contains no variably spiced exons and is modified with CS but not HS (28). CD44H is expressed by resting and activated lymphocytes and activated endothelial cells. In this study, we show that CD44 modified with CS alone is capable of binding and presenting the chemokine RANTES but not the HS-binding growth factor b-FGF. On the other hand, CD44 isoforms containing variably spliced exon V3, which are expressed by activated monocytes, dendritic cells, and keratinocytes, are modified with HS and CS and are capable of binding both RANTES and b-FGF. These findings indicate that the alternative splicing of CD44 provides a molecular mechanism for CD44 to function as an immune regulator, by determining which growth factors and/or chemokines are localized and presented. The ability of CS-modified CD44 to bind RANTES indicates that CS-modified proteoglycans play an important role in adding diversity to the process of chemokine binding and presentation. There is evidence to suggest that CS-modified proteoglycans are more abundant than HS-modified proteoglycans (39, 40) and, as such, may play a dominant role in chemokine activity.

The artificial proteoglycan LFA-3/V3wt-Rg was tested for its ability to deliver the chemokine RANTES and enhance the biological activity of the targeting domain. Soluble chemokines have been shown to exert a costimulatory effect on T cell activation and proliferation if added in combination with the proper T cell stimulus (31). An increase in proliferation of T cell clones was observed when RANTES was added to LFA-3/V3wt-Rg and anti-CD3 mAb-coated plates as compared with immobilized LFA-3-Rg and anti-CD3 mAb. In addition, human T cells exhibited potent chemotaxis in response to C-C chemokines immobilized on LFA-3/V3wt-Rg-, but not LFA-3-Rg-, coated polycarbonate filters (data not shown), strongly supporting the presentation ability of our recombinant CD44 construct. Taken together, these data demonstrate that artificial proteoglycans can be engineered such that the biological activity of the targeting domain can be enhanced by delivering GAG-binding molecules.

We attempted to generate an artificial proteoglycan by placing the eight aa located downstream of the SGSG in CD44 exon V3 downstream of a natural SG site in a polypeptide typically not modified with GAG chains. These studies were performed with LFA-3, which contains a single SG and does not normally support GAG assembly. The placement of the eight amino acids (IDDDEDFI) from CD44 exon V3 downstream of the SG site in LFA-3 did not result in CS and/or HS assembly.3 This supports the notion that the enzymes responsible for GAG assembly recognize the SG site to be modified in a three-dimensional context. This is consistent with the observations that not all SG sites support GAG assembly. Such a structural requirement for GAG assembly has been observed in the analysis of decorin (41).

The ability to generate artificial proteoglycans was attractive in light of recent evidence which indicates that proteoglycans play an important role in regulating the activity of GAG binding molecules, including growth factors and chemokines (42). This regulatory function is mediated in part by the ability of proteoglycans to bind multiple copies of GAG-binding proteins, prolonging their high local concentration, and increasing the likelihood that they will encounter, bind, and drive the oligomerization of their specific signaling receptors. There is also evidence that some GAG-binding proteins, upon interaction with GAGs, induce dimerization of their receptors, potentially changing their conformation, creating a more favorable environment for ligand driven receptor signaling (43). In addition, there appears to be a significant level of specificity in the interaction between GAG-binding proteins and GAGs. For example, certain HS-binding proteins can bind only to a subset of HS-modified proteoglycans (44). This specificity is thought to be driven by HS heterogeneity arising from distinct levels of sulfation, disaccharide composition, and chain length (45). Differences between the abilities of GAG-binding proteins to bind CS or HS also impart specificity to interactions with proteoglycans, as shown by the comparison of b-FGF and RANTES binding to CD44. Thus artificial proteoglycans containing targeting domains and/or functional domains can be used to manipulate the levels, types, and activity of GAG-binding proteins in vitro and in vivo. In addition, artificial proteoglycans provide a convenient in vitro system to study the binding relationships between GAGs and the proteins with which they interact.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Bill Bear for oligonucleotide primer preparation, as well as Joe Cook and Trent Youngman for DNA sequencing. We are also grateful to Robin Michaels and Debby Baxter for help in the preparation of this manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: BMS-PRI, P. O. Box 4000, Princeton, NJ 08543. Tel.: 609-252-6072; Fax: 609-252-6058; E-mail: wolffe{at}bms.com.

The abbreviations used are: GAG, glycosaminoglycan; b-FGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; CD, cluster of differentiation; CS, chondroitin sulfate; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; HS, heparan sulfate; LFA-3, lymphocyte function associated antigen-3; mAb, monoclonal antibody; RANTES, regulated upon activation, normally T cell expressed and secreted; Rg, recombinant immunoglobulin; SG, serine/glycine; Th1/Th2, T helper cells; wt, wild type; aa, amino acid(s).

2 D. Taub, unpublished data.

3 B. Greenfield, unpublished observations.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
References

  1. Aruffo, A., Stamenkovic, I., Melnick, M., Underhill, C. B., and Seed, B. (1990) Cell 61, 1303-1313[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Jalkanen, S., and Jalkanen, M. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 116, 817-825[Abstract]
  3. Miyake, K., Underhill, C. B., Lesley, J., and Kincade, P. W. (1990) J. Exp. Med. 172, 69-75[Abstract]
  4. Lesley, J., Hyman, R., and Kincade, P. W. (1993) Adv. Immunol. 54, 271-335[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Culty, M., Miyake, K., Kincade, P. W., Silorski, E., Butcher, E. C., and Underhill, C. (1990) J. Cell Biol. 111, 2765-2774[Abstract]
  6. Weber, G. F., Ashkar, S., Glimcher, M. J., and Cantor, H. (1996) Science 271, 509-512[Abstract]
  7. Denning, S. M., Le, P. T., Singer, K. H., and Haynes, B. F. (1990) J. Immunol. 144, 7-15[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Galandrini, R., Galluzzo, E., Albi, N., Grossi, C. E., and Velardi, A. (1994) J. Immunol. 153, 21-31[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Haynes, B. F., Telen, M. J., Hale, L. P., and Denning, S. M. (1989) Immunol. Today 10, 423-428[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Huet, S., Groux, H., Caillou, B., Valentin, H., Prieur, M., and Bernard, A. (1989) J. Immunol 143, 798-801[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Noble, P. W., Lake, F. R., Henson, P. M., and Riches, D. W. H. (1993) J. Clin. Invest. 91, 2368-2377[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Shimizu, Y., Van Seventer, G. A., Siraganian, R., Wahl, L., and Shaw, S. (1989) J. Immunol 143, 2457-2463[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Jackson, D. G., Buckley, J., and Bell, J. I. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 4732-4739[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Screaton, G. R., Bell, M. V., Jackson, D. G., Cornelis, R. B., Gerth, U., and Bell, J. I. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 12160-12164[Abstract]
  15. Kinsella, M. G., and Wight, T. N. (1986) J. Cell Biol. 102, 679-687[Abstract]
  16. Peach, R. J., Hollenbaugh, D., Stamenkovic, I., and Aruffo, A. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 122, 257-264[Abstract]
  17. Arch, R., Wirth, K., Hofmann, M., Ponta, H., Matzku, S., Herrlich, P., and Zoller, M. (1992) Science 257, 682-685[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Günthert, U., Hofmann, M., Rudy, W., Reber, S., Zöller, M., Haußmann, I., Matzku, S., Wenzel, A., Ponta, H., and Herrlich, P. (1991) Cell 65, 13-24[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Bennett, K. L., Modrell, B., Greenfield, B., Bartolazzi, A., Stamenkovic, I., Peach, R., Jackson, D. G., Spring, F., and Aruffo, A. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 131, 1623-1633[Abstract]
  20. Katoh, S., Zheng, Z., Oritani, K., Shimozato, T., and Kincade, P. W. (1995) J. Exp. Med. 182, 419-429[Abstract]
  21. Brown, T. A., Bouchard, T., St. John, T., Wayner, E., and Carter, W. G. (1991) J. Cell Biol. 113, 207-221[Abstract]
  22. Ruoslahti, E., and Yamaguchi, Y. (1991) Cell 64, 867-869[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Salmivirta, M., Lidholt, K., and Lindahl, U. (1996) FASEB J. 10, 1270-1279[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Gilat, D., Cahalon, L., Hershkoviz, R., and Lider, O. (1996) Immunol. Today 17, 16-20[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Tanaka, Y., Adams, D. H., and Shaw, S. (1993) Immunol. Today 14, 111-115[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Tanaka, Y., Adams, D. H., Hubscher, S., Hirano, H., Siebenlist, U., and Shaw, S. (1993) Nature 361, 79-82[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Jackson, D. G., Bell, J. I., Dickinson, R., Timans, J., Shields, J., and Whittle, N. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 128, 673-686[Abstract]
  28. Bennett, K. L., Jackson, D. G., Simon, J. C., Tanczos, E., Peach, R., Modrell, B., Stamenkovic, I., Plowman, G., and Aruffo, A. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 128, 687-698[Abstract]
  29. Kanner, S. B., Damle, N. K., Blake, J., Aruffo, A., and Ledbetter, J. (1992) J. Immunol. 148, 2023-2029[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Van Seventer, G. A., Newman, W., Shimizu, Y., Nutman, T. B., Tanaka, Y., Horgan, K. J., Gopal, T. V., Ennis, E., O'Sullivan, D., Grey, H., and Shaw, S. (1991) J. Exp. Med. 174, 901-913[Abstract]
  31. Taub, D. D., Turcovski-Corrales, S. M., Key, M. L., Longo, D. L., and Murphy, W. J. (1996) J. Immunol. 156, 2095-2103[Abstract]
  32. Zhao, X. M., Byrd, V. M., McKeehan, W. L., Reich, M. B., Miller, G. G., and Thomas, J. W. (1995) J. Immunol. 155, 3904-3911[Abstract]
  33. Piepkorn, M., Hovingh, P., Bennett, K. L., Aruffo, A., and Linker, A. (1997) Biochem. J. 327, 499-506[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Witt, D. P., and Lander, A. D. (1994) Curr. Biol. 4, 394-400[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Spillmann, D., Witt, D., and Lindahl, U. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 15487-15493[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Hoogewerf, A. J., Kuschert, G. S., Proudfoot, A. E., Borlat, F., Clark-Lewis, I., Power, C. A., and Wells, T. N. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 13570-13578[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Gilat, D., Hershkoviz, R., Mekori, Y. A., Vlodavsky, I., and Lider, O. (1994) J. Immunol. 153, 4899-4906[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Rot, A. (1992) Immunol. Today 13, 291-294[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Zhang, L., and Esko, J. D. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 19295-19299[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Lindahl, U., Lidholt, K., Spillmann, D., and Kjellen, L. (1994) Thromb. Res. 75, 1-32[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Mann, D. M., Yamaguchi, Y., Bourdon, M. A., and Ruoslahti, E. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 5317-5323[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Goldstein, L. A., Zhou, D. F., Picker, L. S., Minty, C. N., Bargatze, R. F., Ding, J. F., and Butcher, E. C. (1989) Cell 56, 1063-1072[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Vlodavsky, I., Bar-Shavit, R., Ishai-Michaeli, R., Bashkin, P., and Fuks, Z. (1991) Trends Biochem. Sci. 16, 268-271[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Jacobsson, K.-G., Lindahl, U., and Horner, A. A. (1986) Biochem. J. 240, 625-632[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Lindahl, U. (1989) in Heparin and Heparan Sulphate Proteoglycans: An Overview (Lane, D. A., and Lindahl, U., eds), pp. 159-189, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
  46. Greenfield, B., Wang, W.-C., Marquardt, H., Piepkorn, M., Wolff, E. A., Aruffo, A., and Bennett, K. L. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 2511-2517[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.