Cooperative Binding of Upstream Stimulatory Factor and Hepatic Nuclear Factor 4 Drives the Transcription of the Human Apolipoprotein A-II Gene*

Agnès RibeiroDagger §, Danièle PastierDagger , Dimitris Kardassis, Jean ChambazDagger , and Philippe CardotDagger

From the Dagger  U505 INSERM, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Institut des Cordeliers, 15 rue de l'Ecole de Médecine, 75006 Paris, France and  Department of Basic Sciences, Division of Medicine School of Health Sciences, University of Crete, P. O. Box 1393, 71110 Heraklion, Crete, Greece

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

The activity of the human apoA-II promoter is controlled by a synergistic interaction of the distal enhancer and the proximal promoter. An important role in apoA-II promoter activity is exerted by a transcription factor, designated CIIIB1, which binds to the proximal element AB and the distal elements of the enhancer, K and L. In the present communication we establish that CIIIB1 corresponds to the previously described factor, upstream stimulatory factor (USF) using the following criteria. (a) Purification of CIIIB1 by affinity chromatography provided a heat-stable protein with an apparent molecular mass of 45 kDa that cross-reacted with anti-USF1 and -USF2a antibodies; (b) CIIIB1 bound to the elements AB, K, and L was supershifted by these antibodies; (c) the heterodimer USF1/2a is the predominant form that corresponds to CIIIB1. Cotransfection experiments in HepG2 cells established the functional significance of USF in apoA-II transcription. It was found that the minimal promoter AB was transactivated by USF2a. In addition, all three E-box motifs present in elements AB, K and L are necessary for maximum transactivation by USF2a. A dominant negative form of USF2a inhibits the activity of apoA-II promoter. The USF1/2a heterodimer, which is naturally expressed in the liver, is as efficient as the USF2a homodimer in the transactivation of apoA-II promoter/enhancer constructs. Cotransfection experiments in COS-1 cells showed that hepatic nuclear factor 4 (HNF-4) synergized with USF2a in the transactivation of the apoA-II promoter. In addition, we showed that HNF-4 and USF2a bind to the enhancer cooperatively. This may account for the transcriptional synergism observed between USF and HNF-4 in the transactivation of the apoA-II promoter.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Although apolipoprotein A-II (apoA-II)1 is the second most abundant apolipoprotein in high density lipoprotein (1), its physiological functions are still unclear. Inactivation of the apoA-II gene in mice suggests a complex role for apoA-II in atherosclerosis, with both antiatherogenic and proatherogenic properties (2). Clinical observations and tissue culture studies suggest that an increase in apoA-II production may be less protective against atherosclerosis by raising the proportion of a high density lipoprotein subclass containing both apoA-I and apoA-II (LpAI:AII), thereby decreasing the proportion of the antiatherogenic subclass of high density lipoprotein containing only apoA-I (LpAI) (3, 4). ApoA-II is expressed in the liver and, to a much lesser extent, in the human fetal intestine (5). Recent kinetic data in normolipidemic humans indicate that human apoA-II production rate is the major factor determining the distribution of apoA-I between LpAI and LpAI:AII (6, 7). Understanding the molecular mechanisms involved in hepatic transcription of apoA-II may, therefore, lead to the development of new tools to control the ratio between LpAI and LpAI:AII.

We have already reported that the human (-911/+29) apoA-II promoter is sufficient for liver-restricted expression of a reporter gene in transgenic mice (8). The -911/-614 base pair distal region exhibits enhancer properties and potentiates the strength of the homologous proximal promoter AB (-65/-33 base pairs) (9-12) as well as the strength of heterologous promoters (13). The element AB is important for the function of the apoA-II promoter and binds an activity designated CIIIB1 (12). CIIIB1 was first described as a heat-stable factor that binds to element B of the apoC-III promoter (14, 15). The CIIIB1 binding site GTCACCTG contains the CANNTG consensus E-box motif (16, 17). E-box motifs are recognized by basic helix/loop/helix transcription factors, which contain a basic (b) DNA binding domain and a helix/loop/helix (HLH) dimerization domain. In the case of bHLH/ZIP-related proteins, the bHLH domain is contiguous with a second dimerization domain, a leucine zipper (ZIP). The latter group includes a wide variety of transcription factors, such as c-Myc, Max (18), TFE3 (19), TFEB (20), SREBP1 (21), and upstream stimulatory factor (USF) (16). USF appears to be the predominant bHLH/ZIP factor in liver nuclear extracts (22). Human USF was first designated as major late transcription factor (16). Three USF isoforms have been described, USF1, 2a, and 2b, with apparent molecular masses of 43, 44, and 38 kDa, respectively (23-25). USF1 and USF2a and 2b are encoded by two different genes, and USF2a and 2b are generated by differential splicing. Although ubiquitously expressed, USF has been involved in transcription of genes with tissue specificity (25, 26).

In the present study, we purified CIIIB1 from rat liver nuclear extracts by DNA sequence-specific affinity chromatography. We found that CIIIB1 is immunologically related to USF using anti-USF1 and anti-USF2a. DNA binding and competition experiments showed that USF binds to the regulatory elements AB, K, and L. We have established in HepG2 cells the functional significance of USF in apoA-II promoter activity. Finally, cotransfection experiments in COS-1 cells and DNA binding assays demonstrated synergism between USF2a and HNF-4 in the transactivation of the apoA-II promoter and a cooperative binding of the two factors to their cognate sites of the apoA-II promoter.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Synthetic Oligonucleotides-- The following oligonucleotides were used for plasmid construction in this work. KJ Kpn Hindc contains the sequence of the domains K and J from position -768 to -712 (9) with two restriction sites, KpnI and HindIII. KJ Kpn Hindnc is the complementary strand. L Sal Kpnc contains the domain L from position -807 to -769 (9) with SalI and KpnI restriction sites. L Sal Kpnnc represents the complementary strand. For gel-shift assays, the used double-stranded oligonucleotides of element AB (-68 to -32) and mutated element AB have been previously described (12) (see Fig. 2A). Oligonucleotides J (-738 to -712), K (-762 to -741), K/J (-764 to -712) and L (-805 to -771) represent the J, K, K/J, and L regions of the apoA-II promoter (9). Oligonucleotide CIIIB represents the element B of the human apoC-III promoter from -92 to -67 (14). Oligonucleotides NFY, MLP, and HNF-4 contain the binding site for NFY proteins (27), a consensus binding site for USF (25), and a binding site for HNF-4, respectively (14).

Plasmid Construction-- The AB plasmid, containing the chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) gene under the control of the -80/+29 minimal human apoA-II promoter, has been previously described (9), as have the ABM1 and ABM6 plasmids with mutations M1 and M6 in element AB (12). The E-AB and E-ABM1 plasmids containing the distal enhancer (-911/-614) and the proximal promoter (-80/+29) with either nonmutated element AB or mutation M1 in element AB have also been described (12). To join the K/J and AB apoA-II promoter regions, the AB plasmid was digested by KpnI and HindIII and ligated with the annealed KJ Kpn Hindc and nc oligos, thus generating the K/J-AB plasmid (see Fig. 3A). Similarly, the AB plasmid was digested with SalI and KpnI and ligated to the annealed L Sal Kpnc and nc oligos to generate the L-AB plasmid (see Fig. 3A). The K/J-AB plasmid was subsequently digested by SalI and KpnI to ligate the annealed L Sal Kpnc and nc oligos, thus generating the L-K/J-AB plasmid (see Fig. 3A). After HindIII/XhoI digestion of E-ABM1 plasmid, the ABM1 element was gel-purified. The L-K/J-AB plasmid was then digested by HindIII and XhoI, and the AB element was removed and replaced by the gel-purified ABM1 element, thus generating the L-K/J-ABM1 plasmid (see Fig. 3A). These plasmids were sequenced.

Purification of CIIIB1-- All buffers contained 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM benzamidine, 2 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1 µg/ml pepstatin, which were added just before use. All purification steps were carried out at 4 °C. Nuclear extracts were prepared from rat livers, as described previously (28). The extracts (1.6 g of protein) in nuclear dialysis buffer (NDB) containing 25 mM Hepes, pH 7.6, 0.1 mM EDTA, 40 mM KCl, and 10% glycerol were heated at 85 °C for 5 min, and protein aggregates were removed by centrifugation for 5 min at 13,000 rpm. The supernatant was adjusted to 5 mM MgCl2 and to 125 µg/ml sonicated herring sperm and was used for affinity chromatography purification. DNA sequence-specific affinity chromatography was performed according to Kadonaga and Tjian (29), using as ligand the double-stranded oligonucleotide that represents the element B (-93 to -71) of the human apoC-III promoter region (14). The column was eluted with a step gradient of 0.5 M and M KCl in NDB. CIIIB1 activity was recovered in 0.5 M KCl fractions. Three successive affinity chromatographies were performed.

Partial Amino Acid Sequencing-- After the third affinity chromatography, fractions containing CIIIB1 were further purified by preparative SDS-PAGE (30). The gel was stained briefly in 0.25% Coomassie Blue R-250. A digestion was performed in an excised gel slice with a lysyl endopeptidase. The resulting peptides were separated on a reverse phase C18 column. Amino acid sequence analysis of the selected peaks was performed by automated Edman degradation using an Applied Biosystems model 473A.

Western Blot Analysis-- Affinity chromatography purified CIIIB1 from rat liver nuclear extracts and whole COS-1 cell extract overexpressing USF2a were separated by SDS-PAGE in 10% gel, then electrotransferred on a nitrocellulose membrane in a Bio-Rad apparatus, according to the instructions of the manufacturer. After blocking for 2 h with 3% bovine serum albumin in TBS (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl), rabbit anti-USF1 or -USF2a antibodies, diluted 200- and 1,000-fold, respectively, in TBS with 1% bovine serum albumin, were incubated overnight and washed three times (TBS, TBS with 0.1% Tween, TBS). Antisera against human USF1 (43 kDa) and USF2a (44 kDa) were kindly provided by Michel Raymondjean (U129 INSERM) (25, 31). Then anti-rabbit antibodies conjugated with peroxidase diluted 1,000-fold in TBS with 1% bovine serum albumin were incubated for 1 h and washed three times (TBS, TBS with 0.1% Tween, TBS), and peroxydase-conjugated antibodies were detected using 4-chloro-1-naphtol enzyme as substrate.

Cell Transfection and CAT Assay-- The various CAT gene reporter plasmids were cotransfected with the plasmid RSV-beta gal in HepG2 cells and COS-1 cells using the calcium phosphate-DNA coprecipitation method (32). beta -Galactosidase activity was determined to normalize the variability in transfection efficiency (33). CAT assays were performed in a liquid phase, as described previously (34). The initial velocity of the enzymatic reaction was estimated by measuring the amount of labeled acetylchloramphenicol, which diffused directly into the liquid phase in the scintillation counting vial.

Overexpression in COS-1 Cells-- cDNAs encoding USF1, USF2a, and TDU2 (USF2a that lacks the NH2-terminal activation domain) subcloned into the eucaryotic expression vector pCMV were kindly provided by Michel Raymondjean (U129 INSERM) (25, 31). These vectors and an HNF-4 eucaryotic expression vector (35) were transfected into COS-1 cells using the calcium phosphate coprecipitation method. Whole-cell extracts were prepared as described previously (35) to be used in gel retardation assays.

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSA)-- Annealing and labeling of synthetic oligonucleotides were performed as described previously (14). EMSA were performed according to Fried and Crothers (36) as described by Lacorte et al. (12). Briefly, 3 µl of rat liver nuclear extract (2 to 3 µg/µl of total proteins) and 6 µl of the same extract, heated for 5 min at 85 °C were used in EMSA. Aliquots of 6 µl and 4 µl of the first and second affinity elution fractions, respectively, were also used in EMSA. For supershift assays, anti-USF1, -USF2a, or -HNF-4 antibodies were diluted 10-fold, and 1 µl was added to the reaction mix. Anti-HNF-4 antibody was kindly provided by F. M. Sladek (37).

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

CIIIB1 Is Immunologically Related to USF-- To further characterize CIIIB1, which is essential for apoA-II promoter activity, the protein was purified to near homogeneity from rat liver nuclear extracts by heat treatment at 85 °C for 5 min followed by three cycles of DNA sequence-specific affinity chromatography with the element B of the human apoCIII promoter (Fig. 1). The presence of CIIIB1 in purified fractions was assessed by EMSA analysis using the CIIIB probe (Fig. 1C, lanes 1-4). SDS-PAGE analysis of the affinity-purified CIIIB1 revealed two predominant proteins, with molecular masses of 45 and 97 kDa, respectively (Fig. 1A). The 97-kDa protein was not a dimer of the 45-kDa protein, since affinity samples were loaded on SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions. Digestion with lysyl endopeptidase of the 97-kDa protein generated five peptides, which were microsequenced. The sequences obtained matched perfectly those of the human polypyrimidine tract binding protein-associated splicing factor (PSF) (Table I) (38). Peptide sequences also shared significant homology with the non-Pou domain-containing, octamer-binding protein (NonO) (39, 40).


View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Affinity purification and immunological relationship of rat CIIIB1 complex to USF. CIIIB1 is predominantly a USF1/2a heterodimer. A, analysis of CIIIB1 eluted from affinity chromatography by 12% SDS-PAGE. Proteins were stained with Coomassie Brillant Blue. N.E., crude rat liver nuclear extracts. N.E. 85°C, crude rat liver nuclear extract heated at 85 °C for 5 min. 1st to 3rd AFF., fractions eluted in 0.5 M KCl from the first, second, and third DNA-specific affinity chromatographies. M.W., molecular mass markers are as noted. Arrows indicate the two main proteins, with apparent molecular masses of 97 and 45 kDa, respectively. B, analysis of purified CIIIB1 by Western blotting after two affinity chromatographies (2nd AFF.). FT, flow-through of the second affinity column. USF2a, whole-cell extract of COS-1 cells overexpressing USF2a. Proteins were electrophoresed on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and analyzed by Western blotting, as described under "Experimental Procedures." Anti-USF1 and anti-USF2a were diluted 200- and 1,000-fold, respectively. The position of USF1 and USF2a polypeptides are indicated as a closed circle and open triangle, respectively. C and D, analysis of CIIIB1 by EMSA using element B (-92 to -67) of the human apoC-III promoter (CIIIB probe) (B) or the element AB (-68 to -33) of the human apoA-II promoter (AIIAB probe) (C) as probes, in the presence or absence of anti-USF1 or anti-USF2a, as indicated in the figure. CIIIB1 activity was obtained from from rat liver nuclear extract (N.E.), from rat liver nuclear extract heated 5 min at 85 °C (N.E.85°C), from the first affinity column fraction (1st AFF.), and from the second affinity column fraction (2nd AFF.). USF1 and USF2a contain whole-cell extract of COS-1 cells overexpressing USF1 or USF2a, respectively. Oligo CIIIB and oligo AIIAB, corresponding, respectively, to CIIIB and AIIAB probes, are competitors added in 100-fold molar excess. The asterisk indicates USF1/2a heterodimer, the open triangle indicates the USF2a/2a homodimer, and the closed circle indicates the USF1/1 homodimer. EMSA were carried out as described under "Experimental Procedures".

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Comparison of the amino sequence of the peptides obtained from the 97-kDa purified protein with PSF and NonO (38, 39)
Residues in NonO that differ from PSF are underlined.

The 45-kDa polypeptide might correspond to the 41-kDa protein observed by Ogami et al. (15). We investigated whether this protein corresponds to USF because the CIIIB1 binding site, GTCACCTG, contains an E-box motif, CANNTG. This motif binds heat-stable b/HLH/ZIP proteins such as USF, which is expressed abundantly in the liver. An immunoblot analysis was performed with specific antibodies raised against the transactivation domain of USF1 (M domain) or USF2a (G domain) (25) (Fig. 1B). Anti-USF1 or anti-USF2a (Fig. 1B, left and right panels) cross-reacted with a 43/44-kDa polypeptide in the purified affinity fraction (Fig. 1B, 2nd AFF.). When both antibodies were used (Fig. 1B, middle panel), two polypeptides were observed in the affinity-purified fraction (Fig. 2B, 2nd AFF.). The upper polypeptide comigrates with the 44-kDa isoform USF2a in the USF2a control (Fig. 2B, USF2a), and the lower polypeptide corresponds to the 43-kDa isoform USF1. To further confirm the identity of CIIIB1, EMSA and supershift assays were performed with anti-USF1 and anti-USF2a (Fig. 1, C and D). The CIIIB1 complex is competed out by a 100-fold excess of unlabeled oligonucleotides CIIIB and AIIAB (Fig. 1C, lanes 5 and 6, and Fig. 1D, lanes 15 and 16). When both antibodies were added to the reaction, the CIIIB1 complex was totally supershifted (Fig. 1C, lane 9, and Fig. 1D, lane 19). A residual complex remained after addition of each antibody. The mobility of the remaining complex corresponds to the homodimer USF1/1 (Fig. 1C, lanes 8 and 10, and Fig. 1D, lanes 18 and 20) or to the homodimer USF2a/2a (Fig. 1C, lanes 7 and 12, and Fig. 1D, lanes 17 and 22). These findings provide strong evidence that CIIIB1 is mostly the heterodimer USF1/2a.

USF Binds to Element AB and Transactivates the Proximal ApoA-II Promoter-- USF1 and USF2a overexpressed in COS-1 cells formed specific complexes with the AIIAB probe (Fig. 2B). Oligonucleotides containing specific mutations in the element AB were used as probes that either avoid or do not affect the binding of CIIIB1(12) (Fig. 2A). Fig. 2C shows that binding of USF2a to element AB was not competed out by oligonucleotides ABM1 and ABM2 containing mutations in the E-box motif, which abolish the binding of CIIIB1 (12). In contrast, mutations ABM3 to ABM6, which do not affect CIIIB1 binding (12), competed out USF2a binding. Furthermore, as expected, USF1 and USF2a bound to oligonucleotide ABM6 but not to oligonucleotide ABM1 (Fig. 2D).


View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   USF binding to element AB; analysis of specific DNA binding pattern. A shows the sequence of the wild type and mutated oligonucleotides of the element AB that were used as probes or competitors in B and C. The CIIIB1 binding site is represented by an opened square. The mutant sequences are underlined. B, binding of USF1 and USF2a overexpressed in COS-1 cells to AIIAB probe. C, competition assays of the binding of USF2a to AIIAB probe using mutated oligonucleotides as competitors. ABM1 and ABM2 are specific mutations in the E-box motif. Competitors were added in 10- and 100-fold molar excess. D, DNA binding assays of USF1 and USF2a overexpressed in COS-1 cells to the wild type AIIAB probe or mutated ABM1 and ABM6 probes. EMSA and supershift assays were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures" and in Fig. 1.

To evaluate the potential role of USF in the transactivation of the human apoA-II promoter, cotransfection experiments were performed in HepG2 cells using USF1 or USF2a expression vectors and a vector expressing the CAT gene under the control of the wild-type proximal apoA-II promoter (AB plasmid) shown in Fig. 3A, as well as AB plasmid derivatives containing the mutated forms ABM1 and ABM6 (Fig. 3B). This analysis showed that USF2a transactivated 4.5-fold and 13-fold the proximal AB promoter with 50 ng and 500 ng of plamid, respectively (Fig. 3B). Similar results were obtained by cotransfection with USF1 (data not shown). Cotransfection with a truncated mutant USF2a protein, TDU2, that lacks the NH2-terminal activation domain but contains normal DNA binding and dimerization domains had no effect on the minimal apoA-II promoter activity. Mutation within the E-box motif (ABM1 plasmid) diminished the USF2a-mediated transactivation, whereas mutation outside the E-box motif (ABM6 plasmid) resulted in transactivation by USF2a similar to that obtained with the wild type construct (Fig. 3B). The combined data of Figs. 2 and 3 demonstrate that USF binds to element AB and transactivates the proximal apoA-II promoter.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Transactivation of various constructs of the apoA-II promoter by USF in HepG2 cells. A, schematic representation of the (-911/+29) apoA-II promoter (upper panel) and of the various CAT reporter plasmids used for transient transfection experiments (lower panel). B, comparison of the transactivation effect of USF2a or its mutated form, TDU2 (lacking the transactivation domain), on the wild type or mutated apoA-II proximal promoter, which contains one E-box motif. Transient transfections in HepG2 cells and CAT assays were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." For each experiment, CAT activity was calculated by linear regression as the slope of the reaction velocity and was expressed in cpm/min. CAT activities are expressed as a percentage of the activity of the reference plasmid AB, arbitrarily fixed at 1%. C, effect of the distal E-box motifs present in elements K and L on the activity of the proximal AB apoA-II promoter and its transactivation by USF1 and USF2a. CAT activities are expressed as a percentage of the activity of the reference plasmid E-AB, arbitrarily fixed at 100%. D, inhibition of the activity of the L-K/J-AB and E-AB promoters by the mutated USF2a derivative, TDU2. CAT activities are expressed as described in C. Experiments were performed in triplicate and repeated three to five times. Results represent means ±S.D. Statistical significance was determined by Student's t test. a, p <=  0.001 relative to the AB reporter with control DNA. b, p > 0.05 relative to the AB reporter with control DNA. c, p > 0.05 relative to the ABM1 reporter with control DNA. d, p <=  0.01 relative to the ABM6 reporter with control DNA.

Synergistic Interaction of USF Bound to Proximal and Distal Elements Containing E-box Motifs-- Similarly to element AB, elements K and L bind CIIIB1 (10). The addition of anti-USF1 or -USF2a antibodies supershifted the CIIIB1 complex formed with the AIIK probe and crude nuclear extracts obtained from HepG2 cells or affinity-purified CIIIB1 fractions (Fig. 4A, N.E. and 2nd AFF.). The AIIL probe formed with HepG2 nuclear extract multiple DNA-protein complexes related to NFY and C/EBP family, giving a smeary pattern (Fig. 4B, lanes 7-9). After competition with an oligonucleotide containing the binding site of NFY, CIIIB1 became the predominant activity (Fig. 4B, lane 10) and was specifically supershifted by anti-USF1 and -UFS2a (Fig. 4B, lanes 11 and 12). Fig. 4B (lanes 13-16) shows that affinity-purified CIIIB1 binds to the AIIL probe and is supershifted by both antibodies. In addition, EMSA with USF1 and USF2a, overexpressed in COS-1 cells, gave direct evidence of the binding of USF1 or USF2a to K and L elements (Fig. 4C).


View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   The apoA-II enhancer region -911/-614 contains two USF binding sites located in the elements K and L. A, EMSA using AIIK double-strand oligonucleotide (-762 to -741) as probe and nuclear extract obtained from HepG2 (N.E.) or purified second affinity CIIIB1 fraction (2nd AFF.). Supershift assays were performed with the addition of anti-USF1 or anti-USF2a as described in Fig. 1. B, EMSA using the oligonucleotide AIIL (-805 to -771) as probe. Oligo NFY, an oligonucleotide that contains a binding site of NFY, is used as competitor added in 100-fold molar excess. C, direct binding of USF1 and USF2a overexpressed in COS-1 cells on oligonucleotides AIIK or AIIL as probes. EMSA and supershift assays were performed as described in Fig. 1.

To evaluate the respective contribution of distal E-box motifs within elements K and L in the apoA-II promoter activity, vectors placing the distal elements L and/or K/J upstream of the proximal AB promoter were generated (Fig. 3A). The addition of elements L or K/J to the proximal AB promoter did not modify the transcriptional activity of the proximal apoA-II promoter and the level of transactivation by USF2a (Fig. 3C). However, the addition of both distal elements L and K/J (Fig. 3A) increased 8-fold the activity of the proximal promoter and resulted in an 8.5-fold transactivation by USF2a. Moreover, mutation within the proximal E-box motif diminished the activity of the promoter (L-K/J-ABM1 promoter) as well as its transactivation by USF2a. Given that CIIIB1 mostly consists of a heterodimer USF1/2a (Fig. 1), we analyzed the role of the different isoforms of USF in the transactivation of the apoA-II promoter. Cotransfection of HepG2 cells with USF1 and USF2a expression vectors led to a similar transactivation of L-K/J-AB promoter as cotransfection with USF2a (Fig. 3C). These findings suggest that distal elements L and K/J and proximal element AB are all required for the transactivation of the apoA-II promoter by USF homo- or heterodimers. The role of USF in the transactivation of the human apoA-II promoter was further evaluated using a dominant negative form of USF2a, TDU2, that lacks the transactivation domain. This analysis showed that the activity of the L-K/J-AB promoter is decreased by 40 and 67% by 50 and 500 ng of TDU2 expression vector, respectively, as compared with 50 and 500 ng of the control expression vector, pCMV (Fig. 3D, left panel). The right panel of the Fig. 3D shows a similar 20, 60, and 53% inhibition of the E-AB promoter activity by 50 ng, 500 ng, and 1 µg of TDU2, respectively.

Synergism between HNF-4 and USF in Transactivation of the ApoA-II Promoter-- We have previously shown that element L binds C/EBPalpha and that element K/J contains an E-box motif adjacent to an HNF-4 binding site (10, 35). To determine potential synergism of the liver-enriched transcription factors C/EBPalpha and HNF-4 with the ubiquitously expressed USF, we performed cotransfection experiments of HNF-4, C/EBPalpha , and USF2a with the E-AB reporter plasmid in non-hepatic COS-1 cells. This promoter was transactivated 21-fold by USF2a (Fig. 5A). The transactivation was specific because deletion of the activation domain of USF2a (in the mutant TDU2) abolished the USF2a-mediated transactivation, and mutation of the proximal E-box motif (in the E-ABM1 reporter) was not specifically transactivated by USF2a (Fig. 5A). HNF-4 or C/EBPalpha alone transactivated 2-fold the E-AB promoter activity (Fig. 5B). This transactivation was additive when COS-1 cells were transfected simultaneously with HNF-4 and C/EBPalpha , yielding a 4-fold increase in promoter activity. Cotransfection of COS-1 cells with C/EBPalpha and USF2a resulted in similar levels of transactivation of the apoA-II promoter to those achieved with USF2a alone. In contrast, when COS-1 cells were cotransfected with USF2a and HNF-4, we observed a synergistic 36-fold transactivation of the apoA-II promoter activity (Fig. 5B). Cotransfection of COS-1 cells with the TDU2 mutant of USF2a and HNF-4 resulted in similar transactivation as that of HNF-4 alone (Fig. 5B). These findings clearly establish a synergism between USF and HNF-4 on the transactivation of the apoA-II promoter.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Synergism of the liver-enriched factor HNF-4 with the ubiquitous USF in the transactivation of the apoA-II promoter in COS-1 cells. A, transactivation of the E-AB reporter by USF2a. B, effect of liver-enriched transcription factors C/EBPalpha and HNF-4 on the transactivation of the E-AB promoter by USF2a. CAT activity is expressed as fold activation of the activity of the reference plasmid E-AB, arbitrarily fixed at 1. CAT assays were carried out as described in Fig. 3. Statistical significance was determined by Student's t test. a, p <=  0.01 relative to the USF2a activator.

The binding of USF2a and HNF-4 to elements K and J of the apoA-II promoter was further studied by DNA binding assays. Fig. 6A shows that element K binds USF2a but not HNF-4 (left panel, lane 1 versus lane 5), whereas element J binds HNF-4 but not USF2a (middle panel, lane 9 versus lane 8). As expected, the K/J probe was able to bind both factors (Fig. 6A, right panel, lanes 15 and 17). The simultaneous addition of USF2a and HNF-4 in the reaction (Fig. 6A, right panel, lane 19) generated a slower migrating band, which was competed out by USF-specific oligonucleotides, MLP, AIIAB, and AIIK (Fig. 6A, right panel, lanes 22-24) and by an HNF-4-specific oligonucleotide (Fig. 6A, right panel, lane 25). This slower migrating band corresponds to the simultaneous binding of USF2a and HNF-4. To better characterize the binding of USF2a and HNF-4, we performed EMSA with either increasing amounts of USF2a and a constant amount of HNF-4 or increasing amounts of HNF-4 and a constant amount of USF2a. Fig. 6B shows that when the USF2a/HNF-4 ratio increased (lanes 4-6), the slower migrating band corresponding to the simultaneous binding of HNF-4 and USF2a increased, whereas the band corresponding to HNF-4 binding decreased. When the USF2a/HNF-4 ratio decreased (lanes 7-9), the slower migrating band corresponding to the simultaneous binding of HNF-4 and USF2a increased, whereas the band corresponding to USF2a binding decreased. These results demonstrate a cooperative binding of HNF-4 and USF2a on the element K/J of the apoA-II promoter.


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Cooperative binding of USF2a and HNF-4 on the element K/J of the apoA-II promoter. A, binding of USF2a and HNF-4 overexpressed in COS-1 cells on the (-762 to -741) AIIK probe (left panel), (-738 to -712) AIIJ probe (middle panel) and the (-764 to -712) AIIK/J probe (right panel). Oligos AIIAB, AIIK, and AIIK/J correspond to AIIAB, AIIK, and AIIK/J probes, respectively. Oligos MLP and HNF-4 correspond to oligonucleotide sequences containing the binding site of USF and HNF-4, respectively. Competitors are added in 100-fold molar excess. B, binding of USF2a and HNF-4 on the probe K/J. EMSA and supershift assays were performed as described in the Fig. 1.


    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

The distal region (-911/-614) of the human apoA-II promoter displays an enhancer-type activity (10, 11, 13), which is synergized by the proximal regulatory element AB (12). An important regulatory role is exerted by CIIIB1, a heat-stable transcription factor with an Mr of 41 kDa that binds to the elements AB, K, and L (10, 15). Nucleotide substitutions, which prevent the binding of CIIIB1 to element AB, abolished communication between the proximal region and the enhancer (12). CIIIB1 was purified to homogeneity. However, its relationship with existing factors was not established (15). In the present study, purification of CIIIB1 led to the isolation of two thermostable proteins with relative masses of 45 and 97 kDa, respectively. The relationship between USF and CIIIB1 was investigated because the CIIIB1 binding site, GTCACCTG, contains an E-box motif CANNTG, a binding site recognized by b/HLH/ZIP proteins. USF family members are thermostable (41) and are expressed predominantly in liver (22). Three major USF isoforms, USF1, 2a, and 2b, have been described, which differ in the NH2-terminal transactivation domain and can form homo- and heterodimers. The USF1/2a heterodimer is predominant in liver and the hepatic cell lines HepG2 and ATF3 (25). Using specific antibodies against USF1 and USF2a and AB, K, and L probes, we showed by Western blotting and EMSA that the affinity-purified 45-kDa protein was immunologically related to USF1 and USF2a and that the heterodimer USF1/2a is the predominant form. The optimal binding sequence of USF to E-box motifs has been defined as RYCAC-1G+1TGRY (42). E-box motifs within elements AB, K, and L mainly contain variations in the central portion -1/+1 of the consensus sequence. This may account for the difference in their relative binding affinities for CIIIB1 reported by Cardot et al. (10).

Sequencing of proteolytic peptides of the 97-kDa protein, co-purified with CIIIB1, shared identity with PSF, another heat-stable protein involved in early spliceosome formation (38). PSF shares significant sequence identity with NonO, a protein that binds to DNA via a helix/turn/helix domain and to RNA via ribonuclear protein-binding motifs (RNP) (39). The sequence homology between these two proteins lies within the adjacent RNP and the helix/turn/helix regions. It is interesting to note that NonO is able to enhance the binding of E47, a bHLH protein, to a noncanonical E-box motif (40). This E-box motif is identical to that of the element AB of the apoA-II promoter. Thus, it is possible that PSF could likewise increase binding of USF to element AB via a mechanism similar to that by which NonO enhances E47 binding. Similarly, the heat-stable protein PC5 has been described as a cofactor that stimulates transcriptional activity of USF (43).

We demonstrated the functional relevance of USF in the control of apoA-II promoter activity by the analysis of the transactivation properties of USF on various apoA-II promoter constructs. The minimal promoter containing the proximal E-box motif (AB) and schematic promoters containing various combinations of distal and proximal E-box motifs were specifically transactivated by USF2a. A negative dominant mutant of USF2a, TDU2, that lacks the transactivation domain but contains the DNA binding domain and the dimerization domain, inhibits apoA-II promoter activity. Mutation in the E-box motif within the element AB, preventing communication between proximal and distal E-box motifs (12), strongly reduces transactivation of the mutant L-K/J-AB promoter by USF2a. It is possible that USF molecules bound to two or more independent sites form multimeric complexes and, thus, promote DNA looping (44). Such a mechanism might be involved in apoA-II promoter activity. Our study shows that CIIIB1 is principally a heterodimer USF1/2a. USF1/2a was shown to transactivate the proximal apoA-II promoter (AB) and the L-K/J-AB promoter with the same efficiency as USF2a.

The ubiquitously expressed USF has been found to regulate a wide variety of genes involved in different specialized functions, such as tissue specificity, development, and metabolic regulation (26). Association of USF with other transcriptional factors has been reported (45). Specifically, C/EBPalpha promotes USF binding and activation of the C/EBPalpha promoter (46). Liver-enriched transcriptional factors, C/EBPalpha and HNF-4, bind to the enhancer of the apoA-II promoter. We investigated potential synergistic interactions between USF, HNF-4, and C/EBPalpha . Cotransfection experiments have established synergistic activation of the apoA-II promoter by a combination of USF and HNF-4 but neither by a combination of C/EBPalpha and HNF-4 nor by a combination of USF and C/EBPalpha . The K/J region of the apoA-II promoter contains E-box motifs followed by an HNF-4 binding site. We demonstrated by DNA binding experiments a cooperative binding of USF2a and HNF-4 on the element K/J. This cooperative binding might account for the observed synergism between USF and HNF-4 in the transactivation of apoA-II promoter. This is the first time that such cooperative binding between HNF-4 and USF has been reported. It would appear that the optimal transcription of apoA-II gene is determined by the combined action of ubiquitously expressed factor, USF, and a liver-enriched transcription factor, HNF-4.

The glucose response element or carbohydrate response element of the L-type pyruvate kinase (L-PK) promoter contains two E-box motifs adjacent to an HNF-4 binding site located between nucleotides -168 and -144 (47, 48). These cis-elements are responsible for mediating the transcriptional regulation of L-PK by carbohydrate metabolism and glucagon/cAMP (49). USF was shown to bind the glucose response element of the L-PK promoter. However, the role of USF in mediating glucose response is still under discussion (31, 48, 50, 51). Recently, HNF-4 has been shown to be phosphorylated by PKA and is involved in cAMP transcriptional effects on L-PK gene (52). Using transgenic mice expressing the CAT reporter gene under the control of the (-911/+29) human apoA-II promoter, we demonstrated that the apoA-II gene is transcriptionally regulated at the weaning period (8), during which the high fat diet (milk) shifts to a high carbohydrate (chow) diet, and the insulin/glucagon ratio is modified. Such metabolic regulation could involve USF and HNF-4. It has also been demonstrated that USF binding to a proximal E-box motif is required for insulin regulation of the fatty acid synthase (53). Interestingly, this E-box motif is surrounded by two overlapping sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP) binding sites. USF and SREBP bind on the fatty acid synthase promoter, independently of their respective binding sites, suggesting that distinct signaling transduction pathways are probably involved in recruiting USF or SREBP. It has recently been shown that SREBP-1 and -2 and USF bind to overlapping sites in elements AB and K of the apoA-II promoter (54), suggesting that these elements may also play a role in the regulation of apoA-II gene in response to extracellular cholesterol levels.

In conclusion, ubiquitously expressed USF plays a crucial role in the constitutive expression of the liver-restricted apoA-II gene. The binding of USF to proximal and distal E-box motifs of the apoA-II promoter and the synergistic interaction with the liver-enriched factor HNF-4 result in a synergistic transactivation of the apoA-II promoter. The cooperative binding of USF an HNF-4 may be responsible for this synergy. A potential role of USF in the metabolic regulation of the apoA-II gene is currently being investigated.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to Dr. M. Raymondjean for helpful discussions. We also thank Professor V. Zannis for critical reading of the manuscript and constructive comments.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 0033142346899; Fax: 0033143251615.

The abbreviations used are: apo, apolipoprotein; b, basic; C/EBP, CAAT/enhancer-binding protein; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; HLH, helix/loop/helix; HNF-4, hepatic nuclear factor 4; NonO, non-POU domain-containing, octamer-binding protein; PK, pyruvate kinase; PSF, polypyrimidine tract-binding protein-associated splicing factor; SREBP, sterol regulatory element-binding protein; USF, upstream stimulatory factor; ZIP, zipper; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; TBS, Tris-buffered saline; RSV, Rous sarcoma virus; CMV, cytomegalovirus; NFY, nuclear factor Y; MLP, major late promoter.
    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Eisenberg, S. (1984) J. Lipid Res. 25, 1017-1058[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Weng, W, and Breslow, J. L. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. U. S. A. 93, 14788-14794[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Puchois, P., Kandoussi, A, Fievet, P., Fourrier, J. L., Bertrand, M., Koren, E., and Fruchard, J. C. (1987) Atherosclerosis 68, 35-40[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Huang, Y. D., von Eckardstein, A., Wu, S., and Assmann, G. (1995) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 15, 1412-1418[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Hussain, M. M., and Zannis, V. I. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 209-217[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Ikewaki, K., Zech, L. A., Kindt, M., Brewer, H. B., Jr., and Rader, D. J. (1995) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 15, 306-312[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Ikewaki, K., Zech, L. A., Brewer, H. B., Jr, and Rader, D. J. (1996) J. Lipid Res. 37, 399-407[Abstract]
  8. Le Beyec, J., Benetollo, C., Chauffeton, V., Domiar, A., Lafrenière, M.-J., Chambaz, J., Cardot, P., and Kalopissis, A. D. (1998) Transgenics 2, 211-220
  9. Chambaz, J., Cardot, P., Pastier, D., Zannis, V. I., and Cladaras, C. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 11676-11685[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Cardot, P., Chambaz, J., Cladaras, C., and Zannis, V. I. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 24460-24470[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Cardot, P., Chambaz, J., Kardassis, D., Cladaras, C., and Zannis, V. I. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 9080-9093[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Lacorte, J.-M., Fourniat, E., Pastier, D., Chambaz, J., Ribeiro, A., and Cardot, P. (1996) Biochem. J. 318, 681-688[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Hadzopoulou-Cladaras, M., and Cardot, P. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 9657-9667[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Ogami, K., Hadzopoulou-Cladaras, M., Cladaras, C., and Zannis, V. I. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 9808-9815[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Ogami, K., Kardassis, D., Cladaras, C., and Zannis, V. I. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 9640-9646[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Sawadogo, M., and Roeder, R. G. (1985) Cell 43, 165-175[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Carthew, R. W., Chodosh, L. A., and Sharp, P. A. (1987) Genes Dev. 1, 973-980[Abstract]
  18. Blackwood, E. M., and Eisenman, R. N. (1991) Science 251, 1211-1217[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Beckman, H., and Kadesch, T. (1991) Genes Dev. 5, 1057-1066[Abstract]
  20. Carr, C. S., and Sharp, P. A. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 4384-4388[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Kim, J. B., Spotts, G. D., Halvorsen, Y.-D., Shih, H.-M., Ellenberger, T., Twole, H. C., and Spiegelman, B. M. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 2582-2588[Abstract]
  22. Shih, H.-M., Liu, Z., and Towle, H. C. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 21991-21997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Sawadogo, M. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 11994-12001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Sirito, M., Lin, Q., Marity, T., and Sawadogo, M. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 427-433[Abstract]
  25. Viollet, B., Lefrançois-Martinez, A.-M., Henrion, A., Khan, A., Raymondjean, M., and Martinez, A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 1405-1415[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Henrion, A. A., Martinez, A., Mattei, M.-G., Khan, A., and Raymondjean, M. (1995) Genomics 25, 36-43[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Raymondjean, M., Cereghini, S., and Yaniv, M. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 757-761[Abstract]
  28. Cardot, P., Pastier, D., Lacorte, J.-M., Mangeney, M., Zannis, V. I., and Chambaz, J. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 12139-12148[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Kadonaga, J. T., and Tjian, R. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 5889-5893[Abstract]
  30. Laemmli, U. (1970) Nature 277, 680-685
  31. Lefrançois-Martinez, A.-M., Martinez, A., Antoine, B., Raymondjean, M., and Khan, A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 2640-2643[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Graham, F. L., and van der EB, A. J. (1973) Virology 52, 456-467[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Edlund, T., Walker, M. D., Barr, P. J., and Rutter, W. J. (1985) Science 230, 912-916[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Desbois, C., Massé, T., and Madjar, J.-J. (1992) Trends Genet. 8, 300-301[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Ladias, J. A. A., Hadzopoulou-Cladaras, M., Kardassis, D., Cardot, P., Cheng, J., Zannis, V., and Cladaras, C. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 15849-15860[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Fried, M., and Crothers, D. M. (1981) Nucleic Acids Res. 9, 6505-6525[Abstract]
  37. Sladek, F. M., Zhong, W., Lai, E., and Darnel, J. E., Jr. (1990) Genes Dev. 4, 2353-2365[Abstract]
  38. Patton, J. G., Porro, E. B., Galceran, J., Tempst, P., and Nadal-Ginard, B. (1993) Genes Dev. 7, 393-406[Abstract]
  39. Yang, Y. S., Hanke, J. H., Carannopoulos, L., Craft, C. M., Capra, J. D., and Tucker, P. W. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 5593-5603[Abstract]
  40. Yang, Y. S., Yang, M.-S. W., Tucker, P. W., and Capra, J. D. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 2284-2292[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Sawadogo, M., Van Dyke, M. W., Gregor, P. D., and Roeder, R. G. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 11985-11993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Bendall, A. J., and Molloy, P. L. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 2801-2810[Abstract]
  43. Halle, J. P., Stelzer, G., Goppelt, A., and Meistererns, M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 21307-21311[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Ferré-D'Amaré, A. R., Pognonec, P., Roeder, R. G., and Burley, S. K. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 180-189[Abstract]
  45. Sieweke, M. H., Tekotte, H., Jarosch, U., and Graf, T. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 1728-1739[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Timchenko, N., Wilson, D. R., Taylor, L. R., Abdelsayed, S., Wilde, M., Sawadogo, M., and Darlington, G. J. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 1192-1202[Abstract]
  47. Diaz-Guerra, M.-J. M., Bergot, M.-O, Martinez, A., Cuif, M.-H, Kahn, A., and Raymondjean, M. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 7725-7733[Abstract]
  48. Liu, Z., and Twole, H. C. (1995) Biochem. J. 308, 105-111[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Bergot, M.-O., Diaz-Guerra, M.-J. M., Puzenat, N., Raymondjean, M., and Khan, A. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 1871-1878[Abstract]
  50. Kaytor, E. N., Shih, H., and Towle, H. C. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 7525-7531[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Vallet, S. V., Henrion, A. A., Bucchini, D., Casado, M., Raymondjean, M., Kahn, A., and Vaulont, S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 21944-21949[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Viollet, B., Khan, A., and Raymondjean, M. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 4208-4219[Abstract]
  53. Wang, D., and Sul, H. S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 26367-26374[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Kan, H.-Y., Pissios, P., Chambaz, J., and Zannis, V. I. (1997) Supplement to Circulation, 962708 (abstr.)


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.