A Novel Ubiquitously Expressed alpha -Latrotoxin Receptor Is a Member of the CIRL Family of G-protein-coupled Receptors*

Konstantin IchtchenkoDagger §, Mary A. Bittner, Valery KrasnoperovDagger , Alvin R. Littleparallel , Oleg ChepurnyDagger parallel , Ronald W. Holz, and Alexander G. PetrenkoDagger parallel

From the Dagger  Departments of Pharmacology and parallel  Physiology and Neuroscience and Environmental Medicine, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York 10016 and  Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
References

Poisoning with alpha -latrotoxin, a neurotoxic protein from black widow spider venom, results in a robust increase of spontaneous synaptic transmission and subsequent degeneration of affected nerve terminals. The neurotoxic action of alpha -latrotoxin involves extracellular binding to its high affinity receptors as a first step. One of these proteins, CIRL, is a neuronal G-protein-coupled receptor implicated in the regulation of secretion. We now demonstrate that CIRL has two close homologs with a similar domain structure and high degree of overall identity. These novel receptors, which we propose to name CIRL-2 and CIRL-3, together with CIRL (CIRL-1) belong to a recently identified subfamily of large orphan receptors with structural features typical of both G-protein-coupled receptors and cell adhesion proteins. Northern blotting experiments indicate that CIRL-2 is expressed ubiquitously with highest concentrations found in placenta, kidney, spleen, ovary, heart, and lung, whereas CIRL-3 is expressed predominantly in brain similarly to CIRL-1. It appears that CIRL-2 can also bind alpha -latrotoxin, although its affinity to the toxin is about 14 times less than that of CIRL-1. When overexpressed in chromaffin cells, CIRL-2 increases their sensitivity to alpha -latrotoxin stimulation but also inhibits Ca2+-regulated secretion. Thus, CIRL-2 is a functionally competent receptor of alpha -latrotoxin. Our findings suggest that although the nervous system is the primary target of low doses of alpha -latrotoxin, cells of other tissues are also susceptible to the toxic effects of alpha -latrotoxin because of the presence of CIRL-2, a low affinity receptor of the toxin.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
References

Poisoning with black widow spider venom results in the activation of spontaneous synaptic activity in the peripheral nervous system (1). The major component of the venom that is responsible for the toxic effects in vertebrates is alpha -latrotoxin, a large protein with multiple ankyrin repeats (2-4). Purified alpha -latrotoxin causes spontaneous neurotransmitter release at neuromuscular junctions and in preparations of central neurons such as synaptosomes, brain slices, and primary neuronal cell cultures (5). It has been recently shown that the toxic effects of alpha -latrotoxin are not restricted to the nervous system and that it can also augment secretion from chromaffin cells and beta -pancreatic cells (6-8). Spontaneous alpha -latrotoxin-stimulated secretion is paralleled by an increase in transmembrane cation fluxes through induced large conductance channels of unknown nature (9). It has been thus suggested that ionophoric properties of alpha -latrotoxin are at the basis of its toxic effects. However, at least part of the action of alpha -latrotoxin may be independent of cation fluxes both in neurons and secretory cells (7, 8, 10-12).

Stimulation of neurotransmitter release by alpha -latrotoxin correlates with its extracellular binding to high affinity membrane receptors (5, 13). The toxin-binding sites in membrane preparations were originally identified in ligand binding assays with radiolabeled toxin (14). In those experiments, the alpha -latrotoxin receptors were detected only in the preparations of neural tissues. By immunofluorescence with anti-alpha -latrotoxin antibodies, it was shown that alpha -latrotoxin-binding sites are localized presynaptically in neuro-muscular synapses and therefore might be directly involved in the regulation of neuronal exocytosis (15).

Two types of high affinity alpha -latrotoxin receptors were identified by purification and molecular cloning: neurexin Ialpha , a calcium-dependent receptor (16, 17), and a calcium-independent receptor, CIRL, also called latrophilin (18, 19). The interaction of neurexin Ialpha with alpha -latrotoxin significantly contributes to the effects of the toxin only in physiological high-Ca2+ media, whereas CIRL is important for the toxic effects either in physiological or in nominally Ca2+-free media (20).

CIRL is a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)1 with an unusually large N-terminal extracellular region that contains domains characteristic of cell adhesion proteins. CIRL is an interesting example of a two-subunit GPCR (18). Its two noncovalently bound subunits (p120 and p85) result from the expression of one gene followed by endogenous proteolytic cleavage of the precursor protein in its extracellular region close to the first transmembrane segment. Similar posttranslational modification was reported for leukocyte antigen CD97, a large orphan GPCR homologous to CIRL (21).

The functional properties of CIRL as an alpha -latrotoxin receptor were confirmed by the analysis of secretion in transfected chromaffin cells and beta -pancreatic cells (7, 8, 18). When overexpressed, CIRL renders them supersensitive to the toxin. Interestingly, overexpression of CIRL in chromaffin cells also results in the modulation of physiologically evoked secretion in the absence of any stimulation with alpha -latrotoxin. The ATP-dependent stage of secretion is specifically inhibited by CIRL expression, suggesting that this receptor couples to exocytosis (7).

We now show that in addition to neuronal receptors neurexin Ialpha and CIRL, another alpha -latrotoxin-binding protein exists that is a ubiquitously expressed homolog of CIRL. This membrane protein, which we named CIRL-2, binds alpha -latrotoxin with lower affinity than CIRL (CIRL-1). Overexpression of CIRL-2 in chromaffin cells indicates that it is a functional receptor of alpha -latrotoxin and that, similarly to CIRL-1, it couples to exocytosis. Our results suggest that alpha -latrotoxin can produce toxic effects not only in neurons but also in other tissues.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

alpha -Latrotoxin was purified from lyophilized black widow spider glands and radioactively labeled with 125I by chloramine T procedure. The toxin was immobilized on BrCN-Sepharose as described (16). Chromaffin cell and HEK293 cell transfections and functional analysis of CIRLs were performed as described previously (7, 18).

Cloning and Sequencing of CIRL-2 and CIRL-3-- Molecular cloning experiments were performed according to established procedures and protocols (18, 22). Screening of a directionally cloned rat brain cDNA library in lambda ZAPII (kindly provided by Dr. James Boulter, Salk Institute) has resulted in the isolation of clones highly homologous to the 5'-region of CIRL-1 cDNA (18) but yet significantly different according to restriction endonuclease mapping and partial sequencing. Two sets of overlapping clones were identified encoding CIRL-2 cDNA (15-1, 15-7, 15-11, 15-12, 15-14, 15-19, and 15-20) and CIRL-3 cDNA (17-1, 17-2, 17-9, 17-14, 17-15, 17-17, 17-20, and 17-21). All plasmids were sequenced with T3 and T7 primers. The potentially full-length clones 15-19, 15-12, 17-9, and 17-20 were sequenced on both strands using synthetic primers. In addition, all clones were sequenced in the regions of alternative splicing, identified by restriction endonuclease mapping.

Expression Constructs-- The eukaryotic expression constructs of CIRLs were designed so that they contained minimal noncoding sequence in the 5'-region. The CIRL-2 expression plasmid pCDCIRL-2 was prepared by triple ligation of the fragment BamHI/MfeI of the clone 15-12 and the fragment MfeI/XhoI of the clone 15-19 into expression vector pCDNA 3.1 Zeo (+) (Invitrogen), predigested with restriction endonucleases BamHI and XhoI. The CIRL-3 expression plasmid pCDCIRL-3 was prepared by ligation of the fragment NotI/XhoI of the clone 17-20 into the same expression vector, predigested with NotI/XhoI.

Northern Blotting-- Commercially available blots (CLONTECH) containing ~2 µg of poly(A)+ RNA from human tissues were prehybridized for 24 h at 42 °C in the buffer H (50% formamide, 5× saline/sodium phosphate/EDTA, 5× Denhardt solution, 1.5% SDS, 200 µg/ml sonicated salmon sperm DNA, 2.5 mM sodium pyrophosphate) followed by hybridization in the same buffer under stringent conditions (50 °C, 16 h) with [alpha -32P]dCTP uniformly labeled probes of full-length CIRL-2 or CIRL-3 (Random Primed DNA labeling kit, Boehringer Mannheim). The unincorporated label was removed with ProbeQuant G-50 Micro Columns (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). For hybridization, the probes were diluted with buffer H to final concentrations of 5-7 × 107 cpm/ml. After the hybridization, the blots were washed 3-4 times for 25 min each in 2× SSC (0.15 M NaCl and 0.015 M sodium citrate) with 1% SDS at ascending temperatures starting from 60 °C, with 2 °C increment. The blots were dried and autoradiographed with an x-ray film and intensifying screen at -70 °C for 3-7 days.

Antibody Preparation-- A DNA fragment encoding the extracellular region of CIRL-2 was prepared by a PCR reaction on pCDCIRL-2 as template with primers CGAGGATCCTTCAGCAGAGCAGCCTTGCCA and GTGCTCGAGGTGGCTGCATGCACACGTCGT. The 2500-base pair polymerase chain reaction product was digested with restriction endonucleases BamHI and XhoI and subcloned into predigested vectors pET21a to yield plasmid pET21CIRL-2. The plasmid was transformed into the Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) strain, and individual colonies were isolated and propagated in 1 liter of LB media at room temperature until bacterial cultures reached mid log phase (~8 h). At this point, isopropyl-1-thio-b-D-galactopyranoside solution was added to 50 µM final concentration. 4 h post-induction, the cells were harvested, washed, and lysed by ultrasound sonication in 50 ml of hypotonic buffer A (10 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0) with the addition of protease inhibitors mixture (Boehringer Mannheim). The lysate was centrifuged for 30 min at 40,000 rpm, and the insoluble pellet was resuspended in 50 ml of buffer B (450 mM NaCl, 8 M urea, 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0) and centrifuged for 30 min at 40,000 rpm. The supernatant was chromatographed on 2 ml of Ni2+-matrix (Novagen) pre-equilibrated with the buffer B. After intermediate washes with buffer B supplemented with 50 mM imidazole, the extracellular CIRL-2 fragment was eluted in buffer B containing 200 mM imidazole. The eluate was sequentially dialyzed against buffer B with gradually decreased concentration of urea from 6 M to zero. The recombinant proteins were used for custom production of antibodies in rabbits (Alpha Diagnostics).

Expression of CIRLs in COS Cells-- Expression plasmids encoding CIRLs (pCDR7, pCDCIRL-2, and pCDCIRL-3) were transfected into COS-7 cells by LipofectAMINE procedure with Opti-MEM I serum-free medium according to the manufacturer's protocol (Life Technologies, Inc.). The transfected cells were harvested 48-72 h after transfection.

For Western blotting analysis, approximately 30% of the COS cells harvested from one 100-mm dish were solubilized with 2% Triton X-100 low salt buffer (10 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5). After a 15-min centrifugation at 80,000 × g, the supernatant was incubated with 20 µl of alpha -latrotoxin-agarose for 16 h with rotation. After 2 washes with phosphate-buffered saline, the beads were eluted with 50 µl of 2× SDS sample buffer. 15 µl of the eluate was analyzed by separation in 10% SDS gel electrophoresis followed by Western blotting with anti-CIRL-1 and anti-CIRL-2 antibodies.

Purification of alpha -Latrotoxin Receptors from Multiple Tissues-- Approximately 5 g of each frozen rat tissue (brain, heart, lung, kidney, spleen) and 0.5 g of ovaries (Pel-Freez Biologicals) were homogenized (Polytron) in 25 ml of a low salt buffer (10 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, final pH 7.5) with protease inhibitors mixture (Boehringer Mannheim) followed by 2% Triton X-100 solubilization for 3 h, and 30 min of centrifugation at 80,000 × g. The 15-ml supernatant fractions were incubated with 50 µl of alpha -latrotoxin-agarose and washed twice with a high salt buffer (750 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, 1% Triton X-100, pH 7.5). Protein from the beads was eluted with SDS sample buffer followed by SDS electrophoresis and Western blotting with the appropriate polyclonal antibodies.

    RESULTS

CIRL and Its Homologs Define a Novel Family of GPCRs-- In the course of molecular cloning of CIRL (CIRL-1), two sets of cDNA clones were isolated that were homologous and yet significantly different from CIRL-1 cDNA (18). Significant homology of these novel sequences with CIRL cDNA was found in the region encoding the N-terminal region of CIRL. These clones were characterized by mapping with restriction endonucleases and partial DNA sequencing. Several clones were identified that contained a large open reading frame with a Kozak consensus sequence and upstream stop codons in all frames in the 5'-end and a poly(A) sequence in the 3'-end, suggesting that they contained full-length cDNAs with respect to the coding sequence. These cDNA clones were sequenced completely on both strands.

The protein sequences of CIRL-2 and CIRL-3 were deduced from the cDNA sequences. Multiple alignment of three CIRL sequences revealed significant homology of these proteins (Fig. 1A). A major difference among them was that CIRL-3 contained an additional small domain in the N-terminal region right after the signal peptide sequence (Fig. 1B). The cytoplasmic C-terminal region of CIRLs was significantly less conserved in these proteins than their extracellular and membrane domains. Also, the Ser, Thr, and Pro-rich domain (STP domain) located in the center of the N-terminal extracellular region of CIRLs showed very little degree of conservation.


View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   The structure of the CIRL receptors. A, the amino acid sequences of CIRL-2 and CIRL-3 (GenBankTM accession numbers AF063102, AF063103) are shown aligned with the sequence of CIRL-1 (U72487). The alignment was produced by Clustal algorithm. B, the domain model of the CIRLs. The N-terminal domain shown after the signal peptide sequence is present only in CIRL-3. SR, the secretin receptor family; PM, plasma membrane.

We analyzed the sequences of the newly cloned proteins by BLAST searches of protein data bases. The searches revealed that the CIRLs is a subfamily of the secretin receptor family of GPCRs. CIRLs have seven transmembrane hydrophobic segments that are homologous to other members of the secretin receptor family. Several large orphan GPCRs were identified by searches that are significantly homologous to CIRLs not only in their transmembrane hydrophobic segments but also in a relatively short (about 80 residues) region that is adjacent to the transmembrane core N-terminus and, therefore, should be exposed extracellularly (Fig. 1B). Because this domain is involved in the endogenous proteolytic processing of CIRL-1 and possibly other receptors, we propose to name it GPS which stands for GPCR proteolytic site.2

Interestingly, the N-terminal tails of other members of the secretin receptor family, in addition to the large orphan GPCRs, are also homologous to CIRLs. However, this region of homology is separated by about 350 residues from the transmembrane core of CIRLs (Fig. 1B). The same Cys-rich motif is also found in other large orphan receptors of the secretin receptor family.

In the N termini, after the domain found only in CIRL-3, the CIRLs have domains homologous to a sea urchin lectin and to olfactomedin (Fig. 1B). The variable between homologs STP domain is followed by a region that is homologous between the CIRL homologs and three recently discovered genes of the BAI (brain-specific angiogenesis inhibitor) family (23, 24).

Tissue Distribution of CIRLs-- To further characterize CIRL-2 and CIRL-3, we analyzed their tissue distribution by Northern blotting (Fig. 2). In contrast with CIRL-1, which is predominantly expressed in brain, CIRL-2 messages were found almost in all tissues tested although in variable concentrations. The highest levels of CIRL-2 were found in placenta, heart, lung, kidney, pancreas, spleen, and ovary. Brain, liver, and testis showed intermediate amounts of CIRL-2. The lowest quantities of this mRNA were detected in skeletal muscle, whereas in thymus and peripheral blood leukocytes, no signal could be detected at this level of sensitivity. The CIRL-3 mRNA was expressed predominantly in brain with significantly lower levels in heart, placenta, pancreas, kidney, and testis.


View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   CIRL-2 and CIRL-3 mRNA tissue distribution. Commercially available blots (CLONTECH) containing ~2 µg of poly(A)+ RNA from the indicated human tissues were hybridized under stringent conditions with uniformly labeled full-length CIRL-2 and CIRL-3 cDNA probes. In the bottom panel, RNA loading control, as shown, was obtained by rehybridizing the blots with actin cDNA probe (CLONTECH). Extra bands in heart and skeletal muscle represent additional actin forms known to be expressed in these tissues. Numbers on the left indicate positions of molecular weight markers (kilobases). Periph. Blood Leuc., peripheral blood leukocytes.

Expression of CIRLs in COS Cells-- Structural similarity between CIRL-1 and its newly cloned homologs CIRL-2 and CIRL-3 suggested that the latter two may also serve as receptors of alpha -latrotoxin. To test this hypothesis, the expression plasmids encoding CIRL-2 and CIRL-3 were prepared on the basis of pcDNA3.1 eukaryotic vector and transfected into COS cells. The transfected cells were analyzed for their alpha -latrotoxin binding activity using radiolabeled alpha -latrotoxin. CIRL-1- and CIRL-2-expressing cells bound iodinated alpha -latrotoxin specifically, whereas no binding was observed in CIRL-3 and mock-transfected cells (data not shown). The binding activity of CIRL-2 transfected cells was reproducibly lower than of the cells expressing CIRL-1. This could be explained by either lower affinity of CIRL-2 or by different expression efficiency of the receptors or by both. To discriminate between these possibilities, we analyzed alpha -latrotoxin binding activity of CIRL-1- and CIRL-2-expressing cells by Scatchard plots (Fig. 3). The cells that were transfected with CIRL-2 plasmid showed higher concentration of alpha -latrotoxin-binding sites. However, the affinity of CIRL-2 to alpha -latrotoxin was about 14 times lower than the affinity of CIRL-1.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Scatchard plot analysis of alpha -latrotoxin binding to CIRL-1 and CIRL-2 expressed in COS cells. Approximately 30% of the COS cells harvested from one 100-mm dish 72 h after transfection with CIRL-1 (filled squares) or CIRL-2 (open squares) expression plasmids was used for each measurement in the 125I-alpha -latrotoxin binding assay. The value of the binding was calculated by subtraction of the nonspecific binding obtained in the presence of cold 0.1 µM alpha -latrotoxin from the total binding for each 125I-alpha -latrotoxin concentration. B/F, bound/free ([125I-alpha -latrotoxin]).

The results of the binding experiments were confirmed by precipitation of solubilized transfected cells with an immobilized alpha -latrotoxin matrix. The adsorbed proteins were eluted from alpha -latrotoxin-agarose and analyzed by Western blotting with anti-CIRL-1 and anti-CIRL-2 antibodies directed against their N-terminal extracellular regions (Fig. 4). Both CIRL-1 and CIRL-2 were specifically detected by the antibodies as Mr 120,000 bands. This result indicates that CIRL-2 is an alpha -latrotoxin-binding protein and that it is proteolytically processed in the same manner as CIRL-1. With a long exposure shown, some cross-reactivity of the antibodies could be noted. No CIRLs were detected in mock-transfected COS cells, although Northern blotting indicated that CIRL-2 is ubiquitously expressed protein. We may thus assume that either this cell line does not contain CIRL-2 at all or the simian protein is not recognized by our antibody raised against the rat protein or that the levels of this receptor in COS cells are beyond the sensitivity of this assay. Neither anti-CIRL-1 nor anti-CIRL-2 antibody could produce any staining of CIRL-3 transfected cells on Western blots.


View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Expression of CIRL-1 and CIRL-2 in COS cells. Approximately 30% of the COS cells harvested from one 100-mm dish 72 h after transient transfection with appropriate plasmid was solubilized in 2% Triton X-100 low salt buffer followed by binding with 20 µl of alpha -latrotoxin-agarose and two washes with a high salt buffer. Protein from the beads was eluted with 50 µl of 2× SDS sample buffer followed by SDS electrophoresis of a 15-µl sample in a 10% polyacrylamide gel and Western blotting with polyclonal antibodies raised against extracellular region (p120) of CIRL-1 and CIRL-2. Numbers on the right indicate positions of molecular weight markers (kDa).

Functional Expression of CIRL-2 in Chromaffin Cells and HEK293 Cells-- The functional properties of CIRL-2 were examined in HEK293 cells and bovine chromaffin cells. When transfected HEK293 cells were exposed to 50 pM alpha -latrotoxin in PSS containing both Ca2+ and Mg2+, CIRL-2 supported a substantial 45Ca uptake as did CIRL-1 (Fig. 5). A small amount of alpha -latrotoxin-stimulated uptake occurred in cells expressing pCMVneo and in untransfected cells (not shown), suggesting the presence of an endogenous alpha -latrotoxin receptor.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   CIRL-2 supports Ca2+ entry elicited by alpha -latrotoxin. HEK293 cells were transfected with plasmids for CIRL-1, CIRL-2, or pCMVneo (a control) by the LipofectAMINE protocol. Two days later, the cells were incubated with or without 50 pM alpha -latrotoxin (±Ltx) in PSS containing 2.2 mM Ca2+ and 0.5 mM Mg2+ and 3 µCi/ml 45Ca2+. After 5 min, the cells were immediately rinsed three times in PSS, and the amount of 45Ca2+ in the cells was determined by liquid scintillation spectrometry. n = 4 wells/group.

We have previously shown that overexpression of CIRL-1 in chromaffin cells results in at least 10-fold increase in their sensitivity to the toxin (7, 18). The ability of CIRL-2 to support alpha -latrotoxin-induced Ca2+ influx was also coupled to an increase in secretion. Chromaffin cells were cotransfected with a plasmid encoding human growth hormone (hGH) and with either a plasmid encoding the CIRL-2 or a control plasmid. Transiently expressed hGH is stored in secretory granules and serves as a marker for regulated secretion from the small population of transfected cells. Chromaffin cells expressing CIRL-2 and hGH were incubated for 4 min with various concentrations of alpha -latrotoxin in PSS without Ca2+ or Mg2+ and with 0.2 mM EGTA. The incubation with toxin in the absence of Ca2+ (during which no secretion occurs (7) was followed by an incubation with PSS containing Ca2+ and Mg2+. Expression of CIRL-2 enhanced the sensitivity of cells to alpha -latrotoxin, as evidenced by the shift to the left in the dose response curve for hGH secretion (Fig. 6). Thus, CIRL-2 functions as an alpha -latrotoxin receptor. Furthermore, as is the case with CIRL itself, CIRL-2 binds latrotoxin in the absence of Ca2+.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Expression of CIRL-2 increases the sensitivity of intact chromaffin cells to stimulation by alpha -latrotoxin. Chromaffin cells were transfected with plasmids for hGH and either CIRL-2 (filled circles) or pCMVneo (open circles) by calcium phosphate precipitates as described. Five days later, cells were incubated with the indicated concentrations of alpha -latrotoxin in PSS without Ca2+ or Mg2+ and with 0.2 mM EGTA. After 4 min, the toxin was removed, and the cells were incubated for an additional 5 min in PSS containing 2.2 mM Ca2+ and 0.5 mM Mg2+. The amounts of hGH (panel A) and catecholamine (panel B) released into the medium and the amounts remaining in the cells were determined. n = 4 wells/group.

We previously demonstrated that expression of CIRL-1 inhibits Ca2+-dependent secretion in permeabilized chromaffin cells in the absence of alpha -latrotoxin (7). The data suggested that CIRL-1 regulates secretion by slowing a specific step in the ATP-dependent priming pathway. We thus determined whether CIRL-2 was similarly able to regulate secretion in permeabilized cells. Chromaffin cells transfected with or without CIRL-2 were permeabilized with 20 µM digitonin for 4 min in KGEP buffer 139 mM potassium glutamate, 20 mM PIPES, pH 6.6, 2 mM MgATP, 5 mM EGTA) containing 2 mM MgATP but without Ca2+ followed by a 2-min stimulation with 30 µM Ca2+ in the continuing presence of MgATP. Expression of CIRL-2 inhibited Ca2+-dependent secretion by 42% (Fig. 7), which is comparable with the inhibition seen with CIRL-1. Thus, we conclude that the CIRL-2 protein is a functional alpha -latrotoxin receptor with properties (e.g. Ca2+-independence of alpha -latrotoxin binding, inhibition of secretion in permeabilized cells) that resemble those of CIRL-1.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   CIRL-2 expression reduces Ca2+-stimulated secretion in permeabilized chromaffin cells. Chromaffin cells were transfected with plasmids for hGH and either CIRL-2 or pCMVneo as in Fig. 2. Four-six days later, cells were permeabilized with 20 µM digitonin in KGEP buffer without Ca2+ for 4 min followed by incubation for 2 min with or without 30 µM Ca2+ in KGEP. MgATP (2 mM) was included in both incubations. The amounts of hGH (panel A) and catecholamine (panel B) released into the medium and the amounts remaining in the cells were determined. n = 4 wells/group.

Low Affinity alpha -Latrotoxin Receptors in Nonneural Tissues-- Our experiments on the expression of CIRL-2 indicated that CIRL-2 is an alpha -latrotoxin-binding protein and that it can serve as a functional receptor of the toxin. The mRNA of CIRL-2 was detected in various tissues not belonging to the nervous system, in some of them (e.g. kidney) at significantly higher concentrations than in brain. However, the presence of alpha -latrotoxin receptors in other than neural or neuroendocrine tissues has never been reported. We prepared crude kidney membranes and analyzed them for binding of radiolabeled alpha -latrotoxin in the same manner as we did with brain membranes. No statistically significant specific binding could be detected in kidney membranes in this assay (data not shown).

To reconcile these apparently contradictory data, we tested various tissues for the presence of alpha -latrotoxin receptors using a more sensitive assay (Fig. 8). The tissues were homogenized and extracted with a Triton X-100-containing buffer, and the extracts were chromatographed on alpha -latrotoxin-agarose. The adsorbed proteins were eluted with the SDS sample buffer and analyzed by Western blotting with anti-CIRL-1 and anti-CIRL-2 antibody. The staining with anti-CIRL-1 antibody verified the presence of CIRL-1 exclusively in neural tissues. In contrast, CIRL-2 was detected in almost all tissues tested, although the relative amount of CIRL-2 in brain extracts was noticeably higher than could be predicted from the results of Northern blotting. A possible explanation would be cross-reactivity of the anti-CIRL-2 antibody with significant amounts of CIRL-1 purified from the brain along with CIRL-2.


View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Tissue distribution of alpha -latrotoxin receptors. Approximately 5 g (0.5 g for ovaries) of each frozen rat tissue indicated (Pel-Freez Biologicals) were homogenized (Polytron) in 25 ml of a low salt buffer with protease inhibitors (Boehringer Mannheim), followed by 2% Triton X-100 solubilization and high speed centrifugation. The 15-ml supernatant fractions were incubated with 50 µl of alpha -latrotoxin-agarose and washed twice with high salt buffer. Protein from the beads was eluted with 150 µl of SDS sample buffer followed by 10% SDS electrophoresis of a 15-µl sample in 10% polyacrylamide gel and Western blotting with anti-CIRL-1 and anti-CIRL-2 antibodies. Numbers on the right indicate positions of molecular mass markers (kDa).


    DISCUSSION

The action of alpha -latrotoxin in neurons requires its extracellular binding to high affinity membrane receptors of two structurally and functionally different types. Type I or calcium-dependent receptors are represented by neurexin Ialpha and, possibly, other neurexins that are neuron-specific cell membrane proteins with one transmembrane domain and the extracellular region typical for cell adhesion molecules. Neurexin Ialpha is responsible for part of alpha -latrotoxin effects in physiological Ca2+-containing media. Type II receptors can bind alpha -latrotoxin independently of Ca2+ presence in the extracellular media. CIRL, a recently discovered representative of the second class of alpha -latrotoxin receptors, is a G-protein-coupled receptor with unusual two-subunit structure. We now demonstrate that CIRL (CIRL-1) belongs to a novel family of large orphan GPCRs that is encoded by at least three different genes. One of these proteins, CIRL-2, is a low affinity calcium-independent receptor of alpha -latrotoxin. Our current data suggest that the toxic effects of alpha -latrotoxin have an even more complex mechanism than was thought earlier because, in addition to two high affinity neuronal receptors, a third, low affinity receptor exists that is expressed ubiquitously.

Several independent experiments indicate that CIRL-2 is an alpha -latrotoxin receptor. When expressed in COS cells, it binds radiolabeled alpha -latrotoxin with affinity in the nM range, which is approximately 14 times lower than the affinity of CIRL-1. In HEK293 cells with overexpressed CIRL-2, alpha -latrotoxin stimulates robust Ca2+ fluxes, an effect that follows the interaction of the toxin with its receptors. Finally, in a chromaffin cell system that allows analysis of secretion quantitatively, CIRL-2 overexpression results in a significant increase in their sensitivity to alpha -latrotoxin. This effect is less pronounced than in the cells with overexpressed CIRL-1 (7), which correlates with a lower affinity of CIRL-2 to the toxin.

Unexpectedly, Northern blotting experiments revealed that, in contrast to CIRL-1 and CIRL-3, CIRL-2 is a ubiquitously expressed protein. alpha -Latrotoxin has been thought to be a specific presynaptic neurotoxin because the primary site of its physiologic toxicity is the neuromuscular junctions (5).

A highly sensitive assay was developed to detect CIRL-2 in tissues. We raised anti-CIRL-2 antibody, which was directed against the extracellular domain of the receptor. A similar antibody against CIRL-1 showed very little cross-reactivity with CIRL-2 and vice versa. Using these antibodies, we were able to detect CIRL-1 and CIRL-2 in tissue extracts enriched by a chromatography on immobilized alpha -latrotoxin (Fig. 8). In close agreement with the data from Northern blotting, CIRL-2 was detected in brain, heart, lung, kidney, and spleen tissues, whereas CIRL-1 could be found only in brain. CIRL-2, detected in this experiment, must represent an alpha -latrotoxin-binding protein, because it was precipitated with alpha -latrotoxin-agarose. We may therefore conclude that alpha -latrotoxin receptors are present in nonneural tissues. CIRL-2 concentrations in various tissues are significantly lower than the concentration of CIRL-1 in brain, which hampered their direct detection by the 125I-latrotoxin binding assay. Another possible explanation would be that CIRL-2 in nonneuronal cells is not transported to the plasma membrane. However, this seems unlikely because when CIRL-2 is overexpressed in nonneuronal COS cells, alpha -latrotoxin receptors can be reliably detected on the cell surface.

What might be the consequences of alpha -latrotoxin interaction with CIRL-2 in nonneural tissues? alpha -Latrotoxin treatment in neurons produces two major effects, spontaneous neurotransmitter release and degeneration of nerve terminals accompanied by general cytotoxicity. In nonneuronal cells, secretory granules, if present, can undergo exocytosis in response to alpha -latrotoxin. This has been demonstrated for chromaffin and beta -pancreatic cells and may be also true for secretory cells of other types.

alpha -Latrotoxin also induces formation of cation-selective pores of high conductance after the binding to its receptors. The fact that these pores are permeable to Ca2+ may explain cytotoxic effects as well as the secretagogue function of the toxin. In CIRL-1-transfected HEK293 cells, robust Ca2+ transmembrane fluxes were observed (7). A similar effect was noted in nontransfected cells, however it was weaker and required higher concentrations of the toxin (25). One of the explanations of this effect is that alpha -latrotoxin interacts with endogenous CIRL-2. If alpha -latrotoxin could induce similar cation channels in various nonneuronal cells, they would cause cellular toxicity as a result of Ca2+ entry.

CIRL-1, CIRL-2, and CIRL-3 define a novel family of GPCRs. The homology of their protein sequence is quite strong, and their domain structure is almost identical. At least two of them, CIRL-1 and CIRL-2, are alpha -latrotoxin-binding proteins. In our experiments, no alpha -latrotoxin binding of CIRL-3 could be detected. However, because the expression of CIRL-3 could not be verified with available antibodies, we cannot make any definite conclusion about alpha -latrotoxin binding properties of CIRL-3 at this time.

Homology searches indicate that CIRLs are part of a novel growing family of large orphan GPCRs with unusual structural features. These receptors include leukocyte antigen CD97, EMR1 hormone receptor (F4/80), the BAI family, an orphan receptor from brain similar to Drosophila melanogaster cadherin-related tumor suppresser, MEGF2 protein, and two putative GPCRs identified by sequencing the Caenorhabditis elegans genome (GenBankTM accession numbers Z54306 and U39848). The members of this family share highest homology in their transmembrane domains and in a short adjacent extracellular Cys-rich GPS domain. CIRL-1, CIRL-2, and CD97 are proteolytically processed endogenously (18, 21), and the integrity of the GPS domain is required for the proteolytic processing of CIRL-1.2 We may therefore hypothesize that all orphan GPCRs with the GPS motif are endogenously cleaved and, thus, consist of two heterologous subunits similarly to CIRL-1.

Another common structural feature of this family of large orphan GPCRs is that the extracellular regions of these receptors contain structural modules typical for cell adhesion or extracellular matrix proteins. These modules include EGF motifs, thrombospondin repeats, STP or mucin-like domains, and lectin- and olfactomedin-related domains. These "chimeric" receptors may therefore have a dual function as signaling receptors and cell adhesion proteins. It is also possible that intercellular contacts may serve as agonists to activate these receptors.

alpha -Latrotoxin produces strong intracellular response as a result of its interaction with CIRL-1 and CIRL-2. However, it remains unclear whether alpha -latrotoxin can work as an agonist or antagonist of CIRL and produce any receptor-mediated signaling. Our recent experiments with C-terminal deletion mutants of CIRL-1 suggest that G-protein-signaling is not critically important for alpha -latrotoxin-stimulated secretion in chromaffin cells (25). The endogenous ligands of CIRLs are not known yet. Chromaffin cell transfection experiments suggest that CIRLs may act as physiological receptors and regulators of secretion because overexpression of CIRL-1 and CIRL-2 results in the inhibition of calcium-evoked secretion (Ref. 7 and Fig. 7). Identification of endogenous ligands and intracellular effectors of CIRLs in the future experiments will be a next important step to better understand the physiological importance of the CIRLs.

    FOOTNOTES

* This study was supported by National Institutes of Health Public Health Service Grants R01NS35098 and R01NS34937 (NINDS) (to A. G. P.) and R01DK27959 (NIDDK) (to R. W. H.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF063102 and AF063103.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology, New York University Medical Center, 550 First Ave., MSB-202, New York, NY 10016. Fax: 212-263-7133; E-mail: ichtck01{at}mcrcr.med.nyu.edu.

2 V. Krasnoperov, K. Ichtchenko, and A. G. Petrenko, manuscript in preparation.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: GPCR, G-protein-coupled receptor; PSS, physiological salt solution; hGH, human growth hormone; PIPES, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
References
  1. Clark, A. W., Mauro, A., Longenecker, H. E., Jr., and Hurlbut, W. P. (1970) Nature 225, 703-705[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Frontali, N., Ceccarelli, B., Gorio, A., Mauro, A., Siekevitz, P., Tzeng, M. C., and Hurlbut, W. P. (1976) J. Cell Biol. 68, 462-479[Abstract]
  3. Grasso, A. (1976) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 439, 406-412[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Kiyatkin, N. I., Dulubova, I. E., Chekhovskaya, I. A., and Grishin, E. V. (1990) FEBS Lett. 270, 127-131[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Rosenthal, L., and Meldolesi, J. (1989) Pharmacol. Ther. 42, 115-134[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Barnett, D. W., Liu, J., and Misler, S. (1996) Pfluegers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 432, 1039-1046[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Bittner, M. A., Krasnoperov, V. G., Stuenkel, E. L., Petrenko, A. G., and Holz, R. W. (1998) J. Neurosci. 18, 2914-2922[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Lang, J., Ushkaryov, Y., Grasso, A., and Wollheim, C. B. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 648-657[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Grasso, A., Alema, S., Rufini, S., and Senni, M. I. (1980) Nature 283, 774-776[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Misler, S., and Falke, L. C. (1987) Am. J. Physiol. 253, C469-C476[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Rosenthal, L., Zacchetti, D., Madeddu, L., and Meldolesi, J. (1990) Mol. Pharmacol. 38, 917-923[Abstract]
  12. Capogna, M., Gahwiler, B. H., and Thompson, S. M. (1996) J. Neurophysiol. 76, 3149-3158[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Petrenko, A. G., and Krasnoperov, V. G. (1998) in Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Toxin Action. Secretory Systems (Linial, M., and Grasso, A., eds), pp. 185-212, Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam
  14. Meldolesi, J. (1982) J. Neurochem. 38, 1559-1569[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Valtorta, F., Madeddu, L., Meldolesi, J., and Ceccarelli, B. (1984) J. Cell Biol. 99, 124-132[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Petrenko, A. G., Kovalenko, V. A., Shamotienko, O. G., Surkova, I. N., Tarasyuk, T. A., Ushkaryov, Y. A., and Grishin, E. V. (1990) EMBO J. 9, 2023-2027[Abstract]
  17. Ushkaryov, Y. A., Petrenko, A. G., Geppert, M., and Südhof, T. C. (1992) Science 257, 50-56[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Krasnoperov, V. G., Bittner, M. A., Beavis, R., Kuang, Y., Salnikow, K. V., Chepurny, O. G., Little, A. R., Plotnikov, A. N., Wu, D., Holz, R. W., and Petrenko, A. G. (1997) Neuron 18, 925-937[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Lelianova, V. G., Davletov, B. A., Sterling, A., Rahman, M. A., Grishin, E. V., Totty, N. F., and Ushkaryov, Y. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 21504-21508[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Geppert, M., Khvotchev, M., Krasnoperov, V., Goda, Y., Missler, M., Hammer, R. E., Ichtchenko, K., Petrenko, A. G., and Südhof, T. C. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1705-1710[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Gray, J. X., Haino, M., Roth, M. J., Maguire, J. E., Jensen, P. N., Yarme, A., Stetler-Stevenson, M. A., Siebenlist, U., and Kelly, K. (1996) J. Immunol. 157, 5438-5447[Abstract]
  22. Petrenko, A. G., Ullrich, B., Missler, M., Krasnoperov, V., Rosahl, T. W., and Südhof, T. C. (1996) J. Neurosci. 16, 4360-4369[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Nishimori, H., Shiratsuchi, T., Urano, T., Kimura, Y., Kiyono, K., Tatsumi, K., Yoshida, S., Ono, M., Kuwano, M., Nakamura, Y., and Tokino, T. (1997) Oncogene. 15, 2145-2150[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Shiratsuchi, T., Nishimori, H., Ichise, H., Nakamura, Y., and Tokino, T. (1997) Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 79, 103-108[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Krasnoperov, V. G., Bittner, M. A., Holz, R. W., Chepurny, O., and Petrenko, A. G. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 3590-3596[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.