The Role of GATA, CArG, E-box, and a Novel Element in the Regulation of Cardiac Expression of the Na+-Ca2+ Exchanger Gene*

Guangmao Cheng, Tyson P. Hagen, Myra L. Dawson, Kimberly V. Barnes, and Donald R. MenickDagger

From the Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, and the Gazes Cardiac Research Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, 29425-2221

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The cardiac Na+-Ca2+ exchanger (NCX1) is the principal Ca2+ efflux mechanism in cardiocytes. The exchanger is up-regulated in both cardiac hypertrophy and failure. In this report, we identify the cis-acting elements that control cardiac expression and alpha -adrenergic up-regulation of the exchanger gene. Deletion analysis revealed that a minimal cardiac promoter fragment from -184 to +172 is sufficient for cardiac expression and alpha -adrenergic stimulation. Mutational analysis revealed that both the CArG element at -80 and the GATA element at -50 were required for cardiac expression. Gel mobility shift assay supershift analysis demonstrated that the serum response factor binds to the CArG element and GATA-4 binds to the GATA element. Point mutations in the -172 E-box demonstrated that it was required for alpha -adrenergic induction. In addition, deletion analysis revealed one or more enhancer elements in the first intron (+103 to +134) that are essential for phenylephrine up-regulation but bear no homology to any known transcription element. Therefore, this work demonstrates that SRF and GATA-4 are critical for NCX1 expression in neonatal cardiomyocytes and that the -172 E-box in addition to a novel enhancer element(s) are required for phenylephrine up-regulation of NCX1 and may mediate its hypertrophic up-regulation.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The Na+-Ca2+ exchanger (NCX1)1 catalyzes the electrogenic exchange of one intracellular calcium ion for three extracellular sodium ions across the plasma membrane in many mammalian cells. Transport is reversible and can facilitate calcium entry, which in the heart is capable of triggering calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (1). The exchanger is most abundant in the heart, where it regulates Ca2+ fluxes across the sarcolemma and serves a critical role in the maintenance of the cellular calcium balance for excitation-contraction coupling.

Na+-Ca2+ exchanger activity in cardiomyocytes is regulated by several factors. It is activated by cytosolic Ca2+ and MgATP (2) and inhibited by cytosolic sodium (3) and ATP depletion (4). A high affinity Ca2+-binding domain has been identified in the large cytoplasmic loop (residues 371-508) that is believed to be responsible for calcium regulation (5). It is also inhibited by the exchanger inhibitory peptide, which corresponds to a 20-amino acid segment at the N terminus of the large cytoplasmic loop (6). A recent study has demonstrated that the exchanger is phosphorylated via a protein kinase C-dependent pathway and that NCX1 phosphorylation appears to coincide with up-regulation of exchanger activity (7).

In addition, the exchanger is regulated at the transcriptional level in cardiac hypertrophy, ischemia, and failure. In the feline model of acute right ventricular hypertrophy, NCX1 message levels are rapidly up-regulated following pressure overload (8, 9). An increase in NCX1 mRNA expression is also observed in cultured cardiac myocytes following alpha -adrenergic stimulation by phenylephrine or exposure to veratridine. Importantly, the exchanger is also up-regulated at both the message and protein levels in end-stage heart failure (10). Very little is known about the genetic elements and transcription factors that regulate NCX1 expression. Identification of the factors involved in NCX1 up-regulation is important to unraveling the sequence of molecular events that initiates hypertrophic growth. Furthermore, it may provide insight into the basis of the development of decompensated heart failure.

The feline (11), human (12, 13), and rat (13, 14) NCX1 genes have recently been cloned. The NCX1 gene is unusual in that it contains three promoters and multiple 5'-untranslated region exons upstream of the coding region. As a result of alternative promoter usage and the resulting alternative splicing, there are multiple tissue-specific variants of the Na+-Ca2+ exchanger (11, 15-17). The feline cardiac minimal promoter (-184 to +172) is responsive to alpha -adrenergic stimulation and sufficient to drive expression of a reporter gene in neonatal cardiomyocytes but not mouse L cells (18). Analysis of the DNA sequence of the feline cardiac basal NCX1 promoter revealed a number of elements that may be involved in regulation and are conserved in the rat promoter (14). There are two CANNTG motifs (E-boxes) at positions -172 and -153 that are potential target sites for the basic helix-loop-helix family of transcription factors. E-box-binding proteins have been demonstrated to mediate the cardiac expression of several genes including the ventricular myosin light chain 2 (19), cardiac alpha -actin (20), and alpha - and beta -myosin heavy chain (21). This region also contains consensus sequence for two GATA boxes at positions -125 and -50. Several cardiac specific genes such as myosin light chain IA, myosin light chain IV, and beta -myosin heavy chain (22, 23) contain conserved GATA binding motifs. The GATA elements in the atrial natriuretic peptide (24) and alpha -myosin heavy chain (25) gene have been shown to be critical for cardiac expression. This region also contains a single MEF-2 element at position -166. A MEF-2-like motif appears to be required for cardiac-specific expression of the rat cardiac troponin T gene. There are six Nkx-2.5 binding sites in the first 1831 bases of the NCX promoter including one in the first 250 bases. The cardiogenic homeodomain factor Nkx-2.5 has been shown to be expressed in early cardiac cell progenitors and plays an important role in cardiac development. A single CArG element is present at position -80. A CArG element (CC(A/T)6GG) is also present in the 5'-flanking region of the cardiac alpha -actin, skeletal alpha -actin, beta -actin, alpha -myosin heavy chain, cardiac myosin light chain 2, and troponin T genes (25-29). The CArG elements of skeletal and cardiac alpha -actin are very homologous to the serum response element and serve as a binding site for the nuclear serum response factor (SRF). In the present study, we perform a detailed analysis of the NCX1 promoter elements important for neonatal cardiocyte expression and alpha -adrenergic induction. We present three main findings. First, expression of NCX1 in neonatal cardiomyocytes requires both the CArG element at -80 to -71 and the GATA element at -50 to -45. Second, electrophoretic mobility shift analysis revealed specific DNA-protein complexes for both of these elements. SRF is one of the factors binding to the CArG element, and GATA-4 binds to the GATA element. Third, mutagenesis and deletion analysis revealed a E-Box at position -172, and an additional enhancer element or elements in the first exon-intron boundary (+103 to +134), which are essential for alpha -adrenergic induction of the exchanger. This region bears no homology to any of the known transcription elements.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- All restriction enzymes and DNA-modifying enzymes were purchased from Promega (Madison, WI) or New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA). QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis and luciferase reporter kits were from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA). Eagle's minimum essential medium (MEM), Hanks' balanced salt solution, horse serum, and newborn calf serum were all from Life Technologies, Inc. Antibodies for supershift assays were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). The AmpliCycle sequencing kit was obtained from Perkin-Elmer (Foster City, CA). All common reagents were of the highest quality and were purchased from either Fisher or Sigma.

Mutations in the NCX1831 Luciferase Construct-- A 2-kb portion of the NCX promoter was cloned into the pGL2 vector as described previously (11). Mutated constructs were generated using QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis. Sense and antisense oligonucleotides were designed to contain the desired mutation flanked on either side by 12 bp of wild-type NCX sequence. Then, these were used to introduce the mutations into the NCX1831 construct by polymerase chain reaction using the manufacturer's protocol. The entire promoter region of each mutant construct was sequenced using the AmpliCycle sequencing kit to ensure that they contained only the desired point mutations.

Cell Culture-- Primary cardiocytes were obtained from 2-4-day-old neonatal rats and cultured by the method described previously (30). Briefly, ventricular myocardium was isolated from neonatal rats, minced, and digested with enzyme solution (2.4 units/ml partially purified trypsin, 2.7 units/ml chymotrypsin, and 0.94 units/ml elastase in calcium- and magnesium-free Hanks' balanced salt solution). The tissue was incubated for 20 min at 37 °C with stirring. After incubation, the cells were put into MEM plus 10% newborn calf serum and centrifuged at 250 × g. The pellets were resuspended in MEM plus 10% newborn calf serum. The incubation and centrifugation step was repeated five more times. Cardiac fibroblast were removed by preferential adherence to polystyene culture flasks for 90 min to obtain cultures with >95% cardiomyocyte purity (31). After enrichment, cardiocytes were plated in gelatin-coated 60-mm culture dishes at 1.25 × 106 cells/plate in 4 ml of modified Eagle's medium (Life Technologies) supplemented with antibiotics (100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 0.25 µg/ml amphotericin B), 10% heat-inactivated newborn calf serum, bromodeoxyuridine, and essential and nonessential amino acids. After serum incubation for 20-24 h, the cultures were washed and incubated in serum-free supplemented Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium including 10-7 M recombinant insulin (Life Technologies, Inc.).

Transfection-- One day after plating, the cardiocytes were placed in MEM containing 4% horse serum 1-4 h prior to transfection. The transfections were performed by the calcium phosphate DNA precipitation method described previously (32). The efficiency of transfection was between 1 and 2%. Briefly, 16 µg of Na+-Ca2+ exchanger-luciferase construct was co-transfected with 8 µg of cytomegalovirus promoter-driven beta -galactosidase expression plasmid and kept in MEM. After 24 h of incubation, the medium was changed, and where designated, phenylephrine (100 µM) was added, and the cells were incubated in 10% CO2 for 48 h. Control cells were treated with 10 µM verapamil to inhibit any spontaneous contractile activity. Cells were washed twice in 3 ml of cold phosphate-buffered saline and lysed for 15 min in reporter lysis buffer (Promega). The lysates were quick frozen and stored at -70 °C. Luciferase and beta -galactosidase activity assays were performed as described previously (11).

Preparation of Nuclear Extract and Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay-- Nuclear extracts were prepared from neonatal rat ventricle as described (33). Briefly, 20 hearts from 1-4-day-old neonatal rats were rinsed 2 times in ice cold phosphate-buffered saline. 5 ml of NE1 buffer (250 mM sucrose, 15 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.9), 140 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM EGTA, 0.15 mM spermine, 0.5 mM spermidine, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.4 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 25 mM KCl, and 2 mM MgCl2) was added to the tissue, which was immediately homogenized and filtered through two layers of cheese cloth. Nonidet P40 was added to the homogenate to a final concentration of 0.5%. Following five more strokes with a Dounce homogenizer, the homogenate was centrifuged at 1000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. Nuclei were then washed with 5 ml of NE1 buffer and centrifuged as above. The pellet was resuspended in 1 packed cell volume of NE1 buffer containing 350 mM KCl followed by another 20 strokes with a homogenizer. The homogenate was centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C to eliminate the large cell debris and then centrifuged at 180,000 × g for 90 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was dialyzed for 1 h to overnight at 4 °C against dialyzing buffer (50 mM KCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 20 mM K3PO4 (pH 7.4), 1 mM beta -mercaptoethanol, 20% glycerol). After enriching for DNA-binding proteins on heparin-Sepharose CL-6B, the supernatant was stored at -80 °C. Nuclear extract (5 µg) was incubated in the presence of 50 µg/ml poly(dG-dC) in binding buffer (50 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 10% glycerol). After 20 min of incubation at room temperature, the samples were loaded on 6% polyacrylamide gels and electrophoresed in 0.5× TBE at 10 V/cm of gel at 4 °C. The gels were dried and exposed to an x-ray film. For oligonucleotide competition or antibody supershift assays, nonradioactive oligonucleotides or antibodies were added to the reaction mixture and incubated for 10 min prior to the addition of the radioactive probe (for a complete listing of the oligonucleotide probes used in these studies, see Table I).

Statistical Analysis-- The raw data were analyzed by standard statistical analysis using StatView software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC), and statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05 by the Dunnett one-tail test.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In our initial characterization of the NCX1 cardiac promoter (11), we demonstrated that a construct containing the first 250 bp of the 5'-flanking region, the H1 exon, and 67 bp of the first intron is sufficient for cardiac-directed expression and alpha -adrenergic stimulation of the luciferase reporter gene. We have since shown that a construct containing only 184 bases of the 5'-flanking region has the same activity as the 250-bp construct (18). This is also in agreement with what has been reported for the rat NCX1 minimal promoter (14). There are consensus sequences for a number of potential DNA-binding factors in the NCX1 cardiac minimal promoter (Fig. 1). There are two potential binding sites for the GATA family of zinc-fingered transcription factors (A/T)GATA(A/G) and two CANNTG motifs (E-boxes) that are potential target sites for the basic helix-loop-helix family of transcription factors. This region also contains a single MEF-2 element, a CArG element, and a binding site for the cardiogenic homeodomain factor Nkx-2.5. It is of interest to note that sequence of both GATA elements, the CArG element, MEF element, and the -153 E-box are perfectly conserved in both the feline and rat NCX1 promoters (14).


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Partial nucleotide sequence of the cardiac NCX promoter sequence. Shown are the H1 exon (uppercase) along with 361 bp of 5'-flanking sequence and the first 67 nucleotides of the first intron. The cardiac minimal promoter (-184 to +172) is contained within this sequence. Numbering is relative to the transcriptional start site represented by the asterisk. Putative cis-acting regulatory elements are underlined. The region contains two E-box elements, two GATA elements, a MEF-2 recognition sequence, a CArG element, and one Nkx-2.5 element. The sequence for the first four exons and the three promoters of the feline NCX1 gene has been previously published (11) and has been submitted to GenBankTM with accession numbers U67072-U67075.

Using the full-length (1831-bp) construct, we introduced site-specific point mutations into each of these elements, and the activity of each of the mutants was compared with the wild-type full-length construct to determine its contribution to cardiac specific expression (Fig. 2). Each NCX1 mutant promoter construct was transfected in triplicate in at least three independent neonatal cardiomyocyte preparations. Point mutations within the -166 MEF-2 and -10 Nkx-2.5 elements resulted in reporter activity of 70-75% of the NCX1831 promoter-luciferase construct. If these elements play any role in the transcription of the NCX1 gene they do so to a very minor extent. Point mutations within the -172 E-box, -153 E-box, and -125 GATA elements reduced reporter activities to ~35-55% of wild type promoter activity. Therefore, these elements appear to contribute to NCX1 transcription. Importantly, point mutations within either the -80 CArG element or the -50 GATA element resulted in luciferase activity of only 3-8% of the control levels. Clearly, the CArG element at -80 and the GATA element at -50 are critical to NCX1 expression in neonatal cardiocytes.


View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Effects of mutations of transcriptional elements on expression of the NCX1 gene. Upper panel, a diagram of the promoter-proximal sequences and the mutated bases (below) for each transcriptional element. Point mutations were created in the full-length, 1831-bp NCX1 promoter-luciferase construct. Lower panel, relative luciferase values for wild type and mutant constructs transfected into neonatal rat cardiomyocytes (n = 3 separate experiments performed in triplicate). Individual constructs were co-transfected with a cytomegalovirus promoter-driven beta -galactosidase fusion vector to normalize transfection efficiency. The relative luciferase values were then normalized to the wild-type NCX1831 construct, and the average was reported as a percentage of the wild-type value.

Mobility Shift Analysis of Nuclear Factors in Cardiac Tissue That Bind to the E-box, CArG, and GATA Elements-- To analyze the potential interactions of the NCX1 cardiac elements with trans-acting factors, we conducted electrophoretic mobility shift assays with nuclear extracts from neonatal rat heart tissue. Oligonucleotide probes were generated for the 5' E-box (-151 to -189), CArG (-93 to -55), and the 3' GATA (-68 to -29) element (Table I). Mutation of the -172 E-box reduced reporter gene expression to 55% of control levels in transient transfection of neonatal cardiomyocytes; therefore, this E-box may play a minor role in NCX1 expression. Incubation of nuclear extracts from neonatal heart tissue with a 32P-labeled E-box oligonucleotide resulted in the formation of a specific protein-DNA complex (Fig. 3A). Specificity was indicated by its competition with a 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled E-box oligonucleotide but not by a nonspecific GATA probe. This E-box element is directly adjacent to a MEF-2 element (Fig. 1), which is present as part of the sequence in the oligonucleotide probe used for the mobility shift assay. Transfection experiments indicate that the MEF-2 element does not appear to be important for NCX1 expression in neonatal cardiomyocytes (Fig. 2). Further, if this element plays a role in NCX1 expression, one would expect it to contribute to the complex of nuclear factors binding to the E-box oligonucleotide probe. Competition with a 100-fold excess of unlabeled MEF-2 element had no effect on the band. This demonstrates that the MEF-2 element does not play a role in the DNA-protein complex observed with the E-box element probe; therefore, it is unlikely to play a role in NCX1 expression in neonatal cardiomyocytes. An E-box element in the alpha -myosin heavy chain gene (34) has been demonstrated to be responsible for the up-regulation of the gene in response to increased contractile activity. Moreover, this E-box has been shown to bind a cardiomyocyte nuclear protein antigenically related to upstream stimulatory factor 1 (USF-1) (34). Gel supershifts were performed to determine if USF-1 is a part of the NCX1 -172 E-box binding complex. Incubation of the DNA-nuclear protein complex with 2 µg of USF-1 antibody did not result in a supershift (Fig. 3B). In addition, the formation of this complex was not altered by incubation with antibodies against either of the widely expressed basic helix-loop-helix factors E12 or E47 (Fig. 3B). Therefore, the NCX1 -172 E-box element-nuclear protein complex does not include detectable amounts of E12, E47 or USF-1.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Oligonucleotide probes
Oligonucleotide probes for EMSA contain a 4-bp (GATC) 5'-overhang for labeling purposes.


View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Gel mobility shift assay for E-box -172. Neonatal rat heart extract (20 µg) was probed with 32P-labeled double-stranded oligonucleotides containing the NCX1 -172 E-box sequence and its immediate flanking sequence. A 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled -172 E-box probe was used as a specific competitor to the labeled probe. Extracts were also probed using a molar excess of -166 MEF2, -51 GATA, and mutant -172 E-box probe to verify that the interactions were specific to the E-box element. All probes and oligonucleotides used for competition experiments are listed in Table I. The labeled probes were 43-mers, and the unlabeled competitors were 20-, 22-, 43-, or 44-mers. Supershift analysis was performed by incubating the reaction mixture with 2 µg of USF-1, E12, or E47 antibody.

Incubation of nuclear extracts from neonatal rat hearts with the 32P-labeled oligonucleotide for the NCX1 -80 CArG element resulted in the formation of two specific protein-DNA complexes (Fig. 4). Competition with a 100-fold excess of the unlabeled 43-mer probe or a shorter 22-mer containing the NCX1 CArG sequence completely eliminated both of these complexes, whereas competition with a 100-fold excess of unlabeled mutant CArG sequence did not affect the binding of the probe to either of these complexes. In addition, incubation with nonspecific competitor DNA (100-fold E-box element) did not compete for binding to either complex. The ubiquitous SRF, which recognizes a CArG element in the cardiac alpha -actin promoter (35), may be involved in the cardiac specific transcription of NCX1. To determine whether SRF actually binds to the NCX1 CArG element, a supershift assay was performed with anti-SRF polyclonal antibody. Incubation of the DNA-nuclear protein complex with 2 µg of SRF antibody showed a definitive supershift, demonstrating that at least one of the components is SRF or is antigenically related to SRF (Fig. 4, lane 6).


View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Gel mobility shift assay for CArG. Neonatal rat heart extract (20 µg) was probed with 32P-labeled double-stranded oligonucleotides containing the NCX CArG sequence and its immediate flanking sequence. A 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled CArG probe was used as a specific competitor to the labeled probe. Extracts were also probed using a molar excess of -172 E-box probe and mutant CArG probe to verify that the interactions were specific to the CArG element. The labeled probes were 43-mers, and the unlabeled competitors were either 22- or 43-mers. Supershift analysis was performed using 2 µg of SRF antibody.

Incubation of nuclear extracts from neonatal cardiomyocytes with a 32P-labeled GATA probe (-68 to -29), revealed a single protein-DNA complex (Fig. 5). Competition with 100-fold excess of unlabeled mutant GATA sequence or nonspecific competitor DNA (E-box (-172)) did not affect the complex; however, competition with a 100-fold molar excess of an unlabeled GATA probe completely eliminated the complex (Fig. 5A). Both GATA-4 and GATA-6 are expressed in the adult heart. To determine if GATA-4 and/or GATA-6 was present in the NCX1 -50 GATA sequence-specific interaction, GATA-4 and GATA-6 antibodies were incubated with the nuclear protein-DNA complex and examined by gel shift analysis. The GATA-4 antibody clearly supershifted the -50 GATA complex (Fig. 5B). No supershift was detected with the GATA-6 antibody (data not shown), indicating that GATA-4 but not GATA-6 interacts with this site.


View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Gel mobility shift assay for GATA -50. Neonatal rat heart extract (20 µg) was probed with 32P-labeled double-stranded oligonucleotides containing the NCX GATA -50 sequence and its immediate flanking sequence. A 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled -50 GATA probe was used as a specific competitor to the labeled probe. Extracts were also probed using a molar excess of -172 E-box probe and mutant -50 GATA probe to verify that the interactions were specific to the -50 GATA element. The labeled probes were 44-mers, and the unlabeled competitors were either 43- or 44-mers (see Table I). Supershift analysis was performed by incubating the reaction mixture with 4 µg of GATA-4 antibody.

Identification of Elements Responsive to alpha -Adrenergic Stimulus-- In order to identify elements mediating alpha -adrenergic up-regulation, constructs containing mutations in the putative elements in the minimal promoter were transfected into neonatal rat cardiocytes treated with phenylephrine. Phenylephrine treatment induced an approximately 2-fold increase in luciferase activity over that of untreated (11) or verapamil-treated cardiomyocytes transfected with the 1831-bp full-length wild-type NCX1 luciferase construct (Fig. 6). Fig. 6 demonstrates that mutations in the -10 Nkx, -166 MEF, -153 E-box, and -125 GATA elements did not affect alpha -adrenergic stimulation. Each shows a 1.8-2-fold induction of luciferase expression with PE treatment. Interestingly, constructs with point mutations in the -80 CArG and -50 GATA elements, which are required for transcriptional activity in the neonatal cardiocytes, have not lost alpha -adrenergic inducible expression. In fact, they are stimulated to a greater extent than the wild type NCX1 construct. This may be due in part to the very low transcription level of -50 GATA and -80 CArG (10-20-fold lower than wild type) mutant constructs. However, an NCX1 construct with the -172 E-box sequence mutated yielded only a 1.2-fold increase in luciferase activity when treated with phenylephrine (Fig. 6). This is significantly less induction than what is seen in the wild type NCX1 construct. Therefore, the NCX1 -172 E-Box element appears to be required for alpha -adrenergic up-regulation. This is similar to the alpha -MHC promoter in which an E-box element was demonstrated to be responsible for up-regulation in response to increased contractile activity (34).


View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Effects of adrenergic stimulation on the expression of NCX1 H1-luciferase chimeric point mutation constructs. Point mutations were created in the putative cis-elements of the feline NCX1 cardiac 1831-bp promoter, the first exon, and the first 67 bp of the first intron fused to the luciferase gene in the pGL2 vector. All transfections of NCX1 deletion and point mutants were performed in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. Individual constructs were co-transfected with a cytomegalovirus promoter-driven beta -galactosidase fusion vector to normalize transfection efficiency. Data are shown as -fold induction of the PE-treated transfections over the reporter activity of each construct without PE treatment. Averages shown are for at least three independent transfection experiments preformed in triplicate. Cells were treated with 100 µM phenylephrine (PE) 24 h after transfection. Control cells were treated with 10 µM verapamil 24 h after transfection to inhibit any spontaneous contractile activity. *, p < 0.05 versus activity of NCX1 1831 for each mutant construct. S.E. bars are shown.

Each of the above constructs contained the entire first exon (H1) and 67 bases of the first intron. Constructs in which luciferase was fused at position +22 of the H1 exon had only 20% of control activity. More importantly, these constructs did not show any up-regulation in response to phenylephrine treatment (data not shown). Therefore, in addition to the -172 E-box, one or more elements within the H1 exon or the first 67 bases of intron 1 appear to be required for alpha -adrenergic stimulation of the NCX1 gene. A series of deletions were made to identify the region responsible for alpha -adrenergic stimulation. Deletion of the last 13 bases of the first exon and the first 67 bases of intron sequence (Delta 94-172) also resulted in a construct with low activity and insensitivity to PE stimulation, indicating that the elements responsible for alpha -adrenergic stimulation are located in this region (Fig. 7). Analysis of the first intron sequence revealed a single GATA element at +135. Since GATA-4 has been recently demonstrated to play an important role in the hypertrophic responsiveness of both beta -MHC and angiotensin II1a receptor promoters (36, 37), mutations were introduced into the consensus +135 GATA element (Fig. 7). PE treatment stimulated reporter gene expression approximately 2-fold, indicating that the +134 GATA element was not required for alpha -adrenergic up-regulation. A deletion from +94 to +119 had low activity and was recalcitrant to PE stimulation, but the smaller deletion from +94 to +103 was still responsive to PE stimulation. In order to further define this element or elements, alpha -adrenergic up-regulation was examined with a construct containing seven point mutations between positions +106 and +112 (NCXM106-112). The mutation of this seven-base region was sufficient to lower luciferase activity and, more importantly, prevent alpha -adrenergic stimulation. In summary, this series of deletion and point mutation constructs have helped define a 33-bp region from +103 to +135 that includes the last two bases of the H1 exon and the first 27 bases of intron 1 (AG/GTAGGTGCAGGGCTTTTGTGATGAAAC). This region contains one or more elements that are requisite for alpha -adrenergic stimulation of NCX1 expression, and at least one of these is contained in part between +106 and +112. Sequence analysis revealed no consensus sequence for known transcriptional elements; therefore, alpha -adrenergic stimulation of Na+-Ca2+ exchanger expression is mediated via the -172 E-box and a novel element or elements present in the first intron.


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Effects of adrenergic stimulation on the expression of NCX1 H1-luciferase deletion constructs. Deletion mutations were created in the first exon (H1) and first intron of the feline NCX1 cardiac 1831-bp promoter fused to the luciferase gene in the pGL2 vector. Upper panel, a map of the H1 exon and first intron region of the NCX1 promoter showing the relative positions of all of the deletion mutations. Position numbers are relative to the transcriptional start site. Lower panel, all transfections involving the NCX1 deletion and point mutations were performed in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. Individual constructs were co-transfected with a cytomegalovirus promoter-driven beta -galactosidase fusion vector to normalize transfection efficiency. The relative luciferase values were then normalized to the wild-type NCX1831 construct and reported as a percentage of the wild-type value. Averages shown are for at least three independent transfection experiments preformed in triplicate. Cells were treated with 100 µM phenylephrine (PE) 24 h after transfection. Control cells were treated with 10 µM verapamil 24 h after transfection to inhibit any spontaneous contractile activity.

In order to further characterize this region and determine whether elements in this region bind nuclear factors, electrophoretic mobility shift assays were performed using neonatal heart nuclear extracts with a double-stranded oligonucleotide probe corresponding to +89 through +128 containing the NCX1 cardiac novel element region (Fig. 8). Four protein-DNA complexes were observed binding to the cardiac novel element region probe. Competition experiments using a 100-fold molar excess of the unlabeled competitor DNA sequences were used to determine specificity of the complexes. Incubation with cold cardiac novel element region probe competed away all but the band 4 protein-DNA complex. Competition with the mutant cardiac novel element region oligonucleotide, NCXM109-112, containing the four point mutations between positions +106 and +112 did not affect B1, B2, or B3 protein-DNA complexes, but the B4 complex was slightly diminished. Competition with the shorter (19-mer) oligonucleotide containing only +103-117 wild type sequence, eliminated the B1, B2, and B3 complexes but had less of an affect on B4. Therefore, the B1, B2, and B3 protein-DNA complexes appear to be specific for the 103-117 region. In addition, the 4-base point mutation further defines the element by demonstrating that a portion of it lies between positions +109 and +112.


View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Gel mobility shift assay for the novel element region. Neonatal rat heart extract (20 µg) was probed with 32P-labeled double-stranded oligonucleotides containing sequence of the suspected novel element region. The wild type 44-mer probe spans the region from +89 in the first exon to +128 in the first intron. A 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled probe was used as a specific competitor to the labeled probe. Extracts were also probed using a molar excess of mutated 44-mer probe, which is identical to the wild type 44-mer probe except that bases +109 to +112 were mutated from AGGT to GAAC (see Table I). A wild type 19-mer probe containing NCX1 sequence form +103 to +117 was used to show specific interaction.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We have used promoter-reporter gene constructs to identify the elements regulating cardiac expression and mediating alpha -adrenergic up-regulation of the NCX1 gene. Here, we demonstrate that NCX1 expression in neonatal rat ventricular myocytes requires at least two DNA sequence elements, CArG and GATA. The CArG element (CCATGTATGG) present at -80 bp diverges from the canonical CArG sequence CC(AT)6GG but, nevertheless, is required for cardiac expression of the NCX1 gene. In addition, we have demonstrated that the SRF is a part of the complex binding to the NCX1 CArG element, suggesting that SRF is required for basal NCX1 expression. CArG boxes are present in the proximal promoters of many muscle genes and have been shown to be involved in skeletal as well as cardiac muscle-specific regulation (38-40).

Although the NCX1 CArG element is required for basal activity, it does not appear to mediate alpha -adrenergic stimulated expression. This is similar to what has been identified in the human cardiac alpha -actin promoter and mouse skeletal alpha -actin promoter (41). Only recently has it been determined how the ubiquitous SRF factor, which mediates transcriptional activation of serum-responsive genes, could regulate muscle-specific genes. Interactions between SRF and other nuclear factors appear to provide mechanisms by which SRF could provide tissue-specific transcriptional activity. SAP-1, Elk-1, and Phox-1 have been demonstrated to potentiate the transcriptional activity of SRF on the c-fos promoter (42). Chen and Schwartz (43) have shown that the cardiogenic homeodomain factor, Nkx-2.5, interacts with SRF to synergistically trans-activate the cardiac alpha -actin promoter. This trans-activation is dependent on an intact serum response element and not on the Nkx-2.5 element. Interaction of SRF with Nkx-2.5 may also be important in the cardiac regulation of the NCX1 promoter. However, we showed earlier that the -10 Nkx-2.5 element does not appear to be required for NCX1 expression in neonatal rat cardiomyocyte (Fig. 2), and this element is not preserved in the rat NCX1 promoter (14). This interaction, if present in the NCX1 promoter, must be mediated via the CArG and not the Nkx-2.5 element, similar to what was found for the cardiac alpha -actin gene. Importantly, Nkx-2.5 and SRF have recently been shown to regulate the cardiac alpha -actin promoter through combinatorial interactions with GATA-4 (44). Although these studies have not focused on transcription factor interactions, our experiments here demonstrate that, in addition to SRF, cardiac expression of NCX1 is also regulated by a GATA-4 factor. We are currently exploring the interactions of Nkx-2.5, SRF, and the GATA-4 factors in the co-activation of the NCX1 promoter.

GATA elements have an important role in the transcriptional regulation of several cardiac specific genes including alpha -myosin heavy chain (25), cardiac troponin C (45), myosin light chain 1/3 (46), and the beta -type natriuretic peptide (24). Although GATA elements do not play a role in the basal cardiac expression of the beta -myosin heavy chain or angiotensin II type 1a receptor, a GATA binding site is requisite for the induction of these genes in in vivo hemodynamic pressure overload (36, 37). GATA-4 plays a critical role in the cardiac expression of NCX1 but is not required for alpha -adrenergic up-regulation. With the exception of the -172 E-box, none of the consensus sequences in the +184 minimal promoter appeared to mediate the alpha -adrenergic stimulation. A series of deletion constructs indicated that a 32-bp region spanning the first exon-intron boundary (+103 to +134) contains one or more additional elements requisite for alpha -adrenergic stimulated up-regulation. Interestingly, this region contains no consensus binding motifs for known transcription factors. Comparison of the rat (14), human (13), and feline (11) gene sequence in this region revealed 100% homology between bases +104 to +114 and that 17 out of the 21 bases in the region from +94 to +114 are identical. Although the findings of this work by no means exclude the existence of other alpha -adrenergic responsive elements elsewhere in the NCX1 gene, they demonstrate clearly that the -172 E-Box and the region between +103 to +134 are both requisite for alpha -adrenergic stimulation in the context of the NCX1831 promoter-luciferase construct. alpha -adrenergic stimulation has been demonstrated to activate signaling pathways that result in cardiac hypertrophy. Although this study demonstrates that this region mediates alpha -adrenergic stimulation, it remains to be seen whether it also mediates up-regulation in response to hemodynamic load. It is important to note that these studies were carried out in neonatal cardiocytes. In vitro transfection of neonatal cardiocytes is an extremely valuable system to identify and begin to elucidate the role of specific cis-elements that mediate changes in expression. But the significance of the elements identified here and whether they mediate basal cardiac expression and/or hypertrophic induced up-regulation needs to be confirmed in adult cardiomyocytes in vivo. Transgenic lines with the NCX1 promoter should permit us to examine the relative importance and role of CArG, GATA, the E-box, and the novel element in mediating the expression of NCX1 during development and in the normal and hypertrophic heart.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to Kristie Blade and Dr. Joachim Müller for fruitful and stimulating discussions and for reviewing the manuscript. We thank Linda Paddock for secretarial assistance.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Program Project Grant HL48788 (Project 3, to D. R. M.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Cardiology Division, Medical University of South Carolina, 171 Ashley Ave., Charleston, SC 29425-2221. Tel.: 843-792-3405; Fax: 843-792-7771.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: NCX, sodium calcium exchanger; MEM, Eagle's minimum essential medium; SRF, serum response factor; bp, base pair(s); USF, upstream stimulatory factor.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
  1. Kimura, J., Noma, A., and Irisawa, H. (1986) Nature 319, 596-597[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Hilgemann, D. W. (1990) Nature 344, 242-245[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Hilgemann, D. W., Matsuoka, S., Nagel, G. A., and Collins, A. (1992) J. Gen. Physiol. 100, 905-932[Abstract]
  4. Condrescu, M., Gardner, J. P., Chernaya, G., Aceto, J. F., Kroupis, C., and Reeves, J. P. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 9137-9146[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Levitsky, D. O., Nicoll, D. A., and Philipson, K. D. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 22847-22852[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Li, Z., Nicoll, D. A., Collins, A., Hilgemann, D. W., Filoteo, A. G., Penniston, J. T., Weiss, J. N., Tomich, J. M., and Philipson, K. D. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 1014-1020[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Iwamoto, T., Pan, Y., Wakabayashi, S., Imagawa, T., Yamanaka, H. I., and Shigekawa, M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 13609-13615[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Kent, R. L., Rozich, J. D., McCollam, P. L., McDermott, D. E., Thacker, U. F., Menick, D. R., McDermott, P. J., and Cooper, G. (1993) Am. J. Physiol. 265, H1024-H1029[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Menick, D. R., Barnes, K. V., Thacker, U. F., Dawson, M. M., McDermott, D. E., Rozich, J. D., Kent, R. L., and Cooper, G. T. (1996) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 779, 489-501[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Studer, R., Reinecke, H., Bilger, J., Eschenhagen, T., Bohm, M., Hasenfuss, G., Just, H., Holtz, J., and Drexler, H. (1994) Circ. Res. 75, 443-453[Abstract]
  11. Barnes, K. V., Cheng, G., Dawson, M. M., and Menick, D. R. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 11510-11517[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Kraev, A., Chumakov, I., and Carafoli, E. (1996) Genomics 37, 105-112[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Scheller, T., Kraev, A., Skinner, S., and Carafoli, E. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 7643-7649[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Nicholas, S. B., Yang, W., Lee, S. L., Zhu, H., Philipson, K. D., and Lytton, J. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 274, H217-H232[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Lee, S. L., Yu, A. S., and Lytton, J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 14849-14852[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Kofuji, P., Lederer, W. J., and Schulze, D. H. (1993) Am. J. Physiol. 265, F598-F603[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Quednau, B. D., Nicoll, D. A., and Philipson, K. D. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 272, C1250-C1261[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Cheng, G., Hagen, T. P., Dawson, M. L., and Menick, D. R. (1998) Circulation 98, I609
  19. Navankasattusas, S., Sawadogo, M., van Bilsen, M., Dang, C. V., and Chien, K. R. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 7331-7339[Abstract]
  20. French, B. A., Chow, K. L., Olson, E. N., and Schwartz, R. J. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 2439-2450[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Molkentin, J. D., Brogan, R. S., Jobe, S. M., and Markham, B. E. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 2602-2609[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Rindt, H., Gulick, J., Knotts, S., Neumann, J., and Robbins, J. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 5332-5338[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Kurabayashi, M., Komuro, I., Shibasaki, Y., Tsuchimochi, H., Takaku, F., and Yazaki, Y. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 19271-19278[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Grepin, C., Dagnino, L., Robitaille, L., Haberstroh, L., Antakly, T., and Nemer, M. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 3115-3129[Abstract]
  25. Molkentin, J. D., Kalvakolanu, D. V., and Markham, B. E. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 4947-4957[Abstract]
  26. Muscat, G. E., Gustafson, T. A., and Kedes, L. (1988) Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 4120-4133[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Mably, J. D., Sole, M. J., and Liew, C. C. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 476-482[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Papadopoulos, N., and Crow, M. T. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 6907-6918[Abstract]
  29. Mably, J. D., and Liew, C. C. (1996) Circ. Res. 79, 4-13[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Foster, K. A., McDermott, P. J., and Robishaw, J. D. (1990) Am. J. Physiol. 259, H432-H441[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Knowlton, K. U., Baracchini, E., Ross, R. S., Harris, A. N., Henderson, S. A., Evans, S. M., Glembotski, C. C., and Chien, K. R. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 7759-7768[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Chen, C., and Okayama, H. (1987) Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 2745-2752[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Roy, R. J., Gosselin, P., and Guerin, S. L. (1991) BioTechniques 11, 770-777[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Ojamaa, K., Samarel, A. M., and Klein, I. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 31276-31281[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Chen, C. Y., Croissant, J., Majesky, M., Topouzis, S., McQuinn, T., Frankovsky, M. J., and Schwartz, R. J. (1996) Dev. Genet. 19, 119-130[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Herzig, T. C., Jobe, S. M., Aoki, H., Molkentin, J. D., Cowley, A. W., Jr., Izumo, S., and Markham, B. E. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 7543-7548[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Hasegawa, K., Lee, S. J., Jobe, S. M., Markham, B. E., and Kitsis, R. N. (1997) Circulation 96, 3943-3953[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Miwa, T., and Kedes, L. (1987) Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 2803-2813[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Amacher, S. L., Buskin, J. N., and Hauschka, S. D. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 2753-2764[Abstract]
  40. Catala, F., Wanner, R., Barton, P., Cohen, A., Wright, W., and Buckingham, M. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 4585-4596[Abstract]
  41. Sartorelli, V., Webster, K. A., and Kedes, L. (1990) Genes Dev. 4, 1811-1822[Abstract]
  42. Grueneberg, D. A., Simon, K. J., Brennan, K., and Gilman, M. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 3318-3326[Abstract]
  43. Chen, C. Y., and Schwartz, R. J. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 6372-6384[Abstract]
  44. Sepulveda, J. L., Belaguli, N., Nigam, V., Chen, C. Y., Nemer, M., and Schwartz, R. J. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 3405-3415[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Ip, H. S., Wilson, D. B., Heikinheimo, M., Tang, Z., Ting, C. N., Simon, M. C., Leiden, J. M., and Parmacek, M. S. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 7517-7526[Abstract]
  46. McGrew, M. J., Bogdanova, N., Hasegawa, K., Hughes, S. H., Kitsis, R. N., and Rosenthal, N. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 4524-4534[Abstract]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.