Epidermal Growth Factor Protects Epithelial Cells against Fas-induced Apoptosis
REQUIREMENT FOR Akt ACTIVATION*

Spencer GibsonDagger §, Shine TuDagger , Ryan OyerDagger , Steven M. Anderson, and Gary L. JohnsonDagger parallel

From the Dagger  Program in Molecular Signal Transduction, Division of Basic Sciences, National Jewish Medical and Research Center and the Departments of  Pathology and parallel  Pharmacology, University of Colorado Medical School, Denver, Colorado 80206

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Chemotherapeutic drugs that damage DNA kill tumor cells, in part, by inducing the expression of a death receptor such as Fas or its ligand, FasL. Here, we demonstrate that epidermal growth factor (EGF) stimulation of T47D breast adenocarcinoma and embryonic kidney epithelial (HEK293) cells protects these cells from Fas-induced apoptosis. EGF stimulation of epithelial cells also inhibited Fas-induced caspase activation and the proteolysis of signaling proteins downstream of the EGF receptor, Cbl and Akt/protein kinase B (Akt). EGF stimulation of Akt kinase activity blocked Fas-induced apoptosis. Expression of activated Akt in MCF-7 breast adenocarcinoma cells was sufficient to block Fas-mediated apoptosis. Inhibition of EGF-stimulated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activity did not affect EGF protection from Fas-mediated apoptosis. The findings indicate that EGF receptor stimulation of epithelial cells has a significant survival function against death receptor-induced apoptosis mediated by Akt.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Expression of epidermal growth factor (EGF)1 receptor family members (ErbB1-4) is observed in many human tumors, particularly of the breast, ovary, and lung (1-4). Overexpression of EGF receptors in these tumors is correlated with poor prognosis for responsiveness to radiation and chemotherapy (1, 5-7). The proliferative response and resistance to chemotherapy afforded by EGF receptor activation in these tumors may allow for the rapid outgrowth of drug-resistant tumor cells (3, 6). Clinically, there is interest in developing strategies to test if a given tumor will respond to a given treatment of radiation and combinations of chemotherapy. This testing could allow the optimization of drug combinations and treatment modifiers to enhance tumor cell growth.

In the past several years, it has been realized that many chemotherapeutic drugs induce apoptosis of tumor cells (8). Studies with human tumor cells of diverse tissue origin indicate that apoptosis is the common end point for drug-induced cell death. This is true for the spectrum of DNA-damaging agents, anti-metabolites, and microtubule toxins (8-10). Cumulatively, these findings have led to the realization that cells don't actually die from overwhelming DNA damage or injury per se, but rather, specific regulatory pathways are activated that induce apoptosis. Thus, a key in successful anti-tumor therapy is to enhance the susceptibility of the tumor cell to undergo apoptosis.

An emerging theme from studies defining the mechanisms of action of chemotherapeutic drugs is the involvement of death receptors, particularly Fas and its ligand, FasL, in drug-induced apoptosis. Fas activation by FasL activates a caspase cascade leading to apoptosis (11-14). Treatment of different tumor cell types with DNA-damaging drugs has been shown to induce the expression of Fas and/or FasL (12). Blocking Fas activation in these cells inhibits drug-induced apoptosis of the tumor cells (12, 13, 15). These findings have demonstrated a signal transduction response from DNA damage to the transcriptional regulation of death receptors and their ligands. In this report we show that activation of EGF receptors in tumor cells of epithelial origin protects against Fas-induced apoptosis.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell Culture-- Cells were maintained in a humidified 7.0% CO2 environment in Dulbecco's modified medium supplemented with 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Life Technologies, Inc.). Media for T47D, MCF7, and HEK293 cells was supplemented with 20% bovine calf serum, 10% fetal bovine serum, and 10% bovine calf serum (Life Technologies, Inc.), respectively. MCF7 cells expressing vector Akt K-M and Akt-myr protein were under selection with 0.5 mg/ml G418 (Life Technologies, Inc.). Each cell line was tested for the presence of EGF receptors and the Fas receptor.

EGF and Fas Stimulation-- Cells (1-2 × 106) were suspended in 1 ml of Dulbecco's modified medium medium-containing serum to minimize incubation volumes. The cells were incubated with or without 1 µg/ml EGF (Biochemical Technology) for 1 h at 37 °C. After the incubation, 1 µg/ml activating anti-Fas antibody (Upstate Biotechnology Inc.) was added, and cells were incubated at room temperature for 10 min. Two ml of Dulbecco's modified medium-containing serum was added to the cells, and the mixture was placed in tissue culture plates. Adherent cells were incubated at 37 °C in a 7.0% CO2 incubator for 24 or 48 h where indicated. Wortmannin (100 nM, Sigma) and PD098059 (50 µM, Parke-Davis) was added at the same time as EGF where indicated. Similar results were obtained when EGF and activating anti-Fas antibody were added directly to adherent cells.

Akt Kinase Assay-- Cells were lysed in Akt lysis buffer (10 mM K3PO4, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, 5 mM EGTA, 10 mM MgCl2, 20 mM beta -glycerophosphate, 0.5 µM sodium vanadate, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 40 ng/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 40 µg/ml aprotinin, and 40 µg/ml leupeptin). Cellular debris was removed by centrifugation at 8,000 × g for 5 min. Protein concentration was determined by a Bradford assay using bovine serum albumin as a standard. Four hundred µg of cell lysates was immunoprecipitated with 2 µg/ml of an anti-Akt1 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) for 1 h at 4 °C with agitation. This was followed by the addition of 15 µl of a 1:1 slurry of protein A-Sepharose beads (Sigma) and incubated at 4 °C for 1 h. The beads were then washed twice in 1 ml of lysis buffer and twice in Akt wash buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 µg/ml protein kinase A inhibitor peptide). Thirty-five µl of the last wash was left in the tube and mixed with 25 µl of Akt reaction mix (Akt wash buffer, 0.2 mM ATP, 0.2 µg/ml cross-tide peptide (GRPRTSSFAEG), 0.2 µCi/µl [gamma 32P]ATP) and incubated for 20 min at 30 °C. The reaction was stopped with 10 µl of 0.5 M EDTA and spotted on P81 Whatman paper. The samples were washed three times for 5 min each in 75 mM phosphoric acid and air-dried. The samples were placed in scintillation vials and radioactivity quantitated.

ERK Kinase Assay-- Cells were lysed in TX-100 lysis buffer (70 mM beta -glycerophosphate, 1 mM EGTA, 100 µM sodium vanadate, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.5% Triton X-100, 20 µg/ml aprotinin). Lysate were treated as described in Akt kinase assay. ERK2 was incubated with 2 µg/ml anti-ERK2 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) for 1 h as described for the Akt kinase assay. The beads were washed twice with 1 ml of lysis buffer and twice with 1 ml of lysis buffer without Triton X-100. Thirty-five µl of the last wash was left in the tube and mixed with 20 µl of ERK reaction mix (50 mM beta -glycerophosphate, 100 µM sodium vanadate, 20 mM MgCl2, 200 µM ATP, 0.5 µCi/µl [gamma 32P]ATP, 400 µM epidermal growth factor receptor peptide 662-681, 100 µg/µl IP-20, 2 mM EGTA) incubated for 20 min at 30 °C. The reaction was stopped with 10 µl of 500 mM EDTA and spotted on to P81 Whatman paper. The samples were washed four times with 75 mM phosphoric acid, air-dried, and counted in a beta  counter.

Immunoblots-- Cells were lysed in Nonidet P-40 lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.25, 150 mM NaCl, 50 µM ZnCl2, 50 µM NaF, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM sodium vanadate, 1.0% Nonidet P-40, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 8,000 × g for 5 min, and protein concentration was determined by a Bradford assay. Two hundred to 400 µg of cell lysate protein was subject to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked in Tris-buffered saline, 5% milk. Blots were performed as described in Widmann et al. (19).

Caspase Assay-- Cells were lysed in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM EGTA, and 100 µg/ml digitonin. Sixty mg of lysate protein was incubated with 5 µM DEVD-7-amido-4-methylcoumarin (Bachem) in 1 ml of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, and 10 mM EGTA for 30 min at 37 °C. Fluorescence was then monitored using an excitation wavelength of 380 nM and an emission wavelength of 460 nM as per manufacture instructions. The caspase activity was measured as arbitrary fluorescence units and converted to fold increases over basal caspase activity in untreated cells. Fluorescence of substrate alone was subtracted in each case. To validate that we were measuring caspase activity, multiple inhibitors of caspase activity such as CrmA were used that reduced DEVD cleavage as measured by fluorescence to background levels.

Measurement of Apoptosis-- Cells (1-2 × 106) were resuspended in 100 µl of media by gentle vortexing and 2 µl of acridine orange (100 µg/ml), and 100 µg/ml ethidium bromide in phosphate-buffered saline was added. Ten µl was removed and placed on a microscope slide, and a coverslip was applied over the 10 µl. The slide was viewed on a fluorescence microscope using a fluorescein filter set for the detection of condensed DNA in apoptotic cells. The condensed DNA was determined by intense local staining of DNA in the nucleus compared with the diffuse staining of the DNA in normal cells. The percentage of apoptotic cells was determined from cells containing normal DNA staining compared with cells with condensed DNA. Apoptosis was verified by propidium iodide staining for DNA fragmentation and morphological changes consistent with apoptotic cells.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

EGF Stimulation of Epithelial Cells Inhibits Fas-induced Apoptosis-- EGF stimulation of T47D breast adenocarcinoma and human embryonic kidney epithelial (HEK293) cells significantly diminished the percentage of apoptotic cells in response to activation of Fas relative to control cells not exposed to EGF (Fig. 1A). Stimulation of Fas in T47D cells resulted in 57 and 74% of the cells to be apoptotic at 24 and 48 h, respectively. Forty-eight h after activation of Fas in HEK293 cells, 66% of the cell population was apoptotic. EGF stimulation before Fas ligation reduced the apoptotic response 48 h later to 38% and 32% in T47D and HEK293 cells, respectively. Similar results were observed with activation of Fas by an activating anti-Fas antibody (Fig. 1A) or soluble FasL (not shown). Quantitation of apoptosis by acridine orange or propidium iodide staining gave similar results. The findings show that in two different epithelial cell types, EGF stimulation reduces the ability of Fas activation to induce cell death by apoptosis.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   EGF treatment of T47D and HEK293 cells reduces Fas-induced apoptosis. A, T47D cells (i) and HEK293 cells (ii) were preincubated with or without 1 µg/ml EGF for 60 min. Where indicated, 1 µg/ml activating anti-Fas antibody was added to the culture medium. After the indicated times, the apoptotic index for each treatment was quantitated by acridine orange staining. Error bars represent the S.D. of three separate experiments. B, cells were stimulated with EGF and activating anti-Fas antibody as above. At 48 h, caspase activity was determined. Caspase activity is represented as fold increase over basal levels. Experiments were done in triplicate with a variability of less than 15%. C, T47D and HEK293 cells were treated for 24 h as described in A. Cells were lysed, proteins were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and immunoblots were performed with antiserums against Cbl, Akt, or MEK1. Experiments shown in B and C were done three times, with similar results.

Fas-mediated Caspase Activation Is Inhibited by EGF Stimulation of Epithelial Cells-- Caspases are the cysteine proteases that when activated cleave proteins at defined aspartic acid-containing recognition sequence motifs (16, 17). The cumulative action resulting from caspase cleavage events commit cells to apoptosis (16-18). Measurement of caspase activity using a fluorescent DEVD peptide substrate for caspase 3-like proteases demonstrated Fas stimulates caspase activity 3- and 2-fold, respectively, in T47D and HEK293 cells (Fig. 1B). Prior treatment of T47D and HEK293 cells with EGF effectively inhibits caspase activation in response to Fas ligation in both cell types. This result indicates that EGF stimulates signal pathways that inhibit Fas activation of caspases. The decreased caspase activation would effectively inhibit Fas-mediated apoptosis.

We recently demonstrated that Fas stimulated caspase-dependent cleavage of several proteins involved in EGF signaling including Akt and Cbl (19). Consistent with the inhibition of caspase activation by EGF (Fig. 1B), EGF stimulation of T47D and HEK293 cells inhibited the proteolysis of Akt and Cbl in response to Fas ligation (Fig. 1C). Protection of Cbl and Akt from caspase-catalyzed cleavage was maintained even after 48 h of Fas activation in the continued presence of EGF (not shown). The expression of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 (MEK1), which is not a caspase substrate (19), is not changed during Fas activation in cells. Thus, the cleavage by caspases of specific signaling proteins, but not every signaling protein, is orchestrated during the apoptotic response initiated by Fas ligation. EGF stimulation of T47D and HEK293 cells inhibits the caspase-dependent cleavage of proteins in response to ligation of the death receptor, Fas.

Activation of Akt Protects It from Fas-induced Degradation-- Akt is activated by EGF stimulation in several cell types (20, 21). Indeed, EGF stimulation of T47D cells activates Akt (Fig. 2A). Akt activation also has been shown to protect cells from stress-induced apoptosis (22-24). The caspase-dependent cleavage of Akt would be expected to prevent this anti-apoptotic response. Therefore, we examined if EGF stimulation of T47D cells sustains Akt activation in Fas-activated cells. The activation of Akt was determined with an antibody specific for the phosphorylated serine 473 of Akt. Serine 473 is located in the kinase domain of Akt, and its phosphorylation is required to indicate Akt activation (23, 24). Increased phosphorylation of Akt was detected within 5 min after EGF stimulation (Fig. 2B). Twenty-four h after Fas ligation, Akt was still activated in EGF-treated cells (Fig. 2B). Furthermore, a second challenge with EGF increased the phosphorylated activated form of Akt in cells exposed to Fas. In contrast, Fas activation in cells that were not prestimulated with EGF resulted in no measurable Akt protein (Fig. 2B). These results show that EGF stimulation of T47D cells not only activates Akt but also protects it from degradation by caspases in Fas-stimulated cells.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Activation of Akt after EGF and Fas stimulation of cells. A, T47D cells were treated with 1 µg/ml EGF in 10% serum for the times indicated. The cells were lysed, and Akt was immunoprecipitated and assayed by in vitro kinase assay using cross-tide peptide as the substrate as described under "Material and Methods." The increase in Akt kinase activity was determined by fold increase over basal levels. B, T47D cells incubated for 24 h with or without 1 µg/ml EGF and with or without 1 µg/ml activating anti-Fas antibody. As indicated, cells were stimulated an additional 5 min with 1 µg/ml EGF. The cells were lysed and Western blotted using an antibody directed against the phosphoserine 473 of Akt. The blots were stripped and reprobed with an anti-Akt antibody. The results are representative of three independent experiments.

Akt but Not ERK Activation Is Required for EGF-mediated Protection from Apoptosis-- The ability of specific signal transduction pathways to have anti-apoptotic regulatory properties is variable in different cell types (25). For example, both Akt and the ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway have been shown to be anti-apoptotic in different cell types and in response to different stress stimuli (23, 25-28). Fig. 3 shows that EGF stimulation of T47D cells activates both Akt and ERK activities. The time course in response to EGF stimulation of ERK activation (Fig. 3A) is similar to that for Akt (Fig. 2A), although ERK activation peaked at 10 min, whereas Akt activation peaked at 30 min. Activation of ERK in response to EGF stimulation is effectively inhibited by incubation of T47D cells with the Parke-Davis compound, PD098059 (Fig. 3B). This compound stimulates the degradation of MEK1 and -2, the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase in the ERK pathway (29). The activation of Akt is regulated by phosphorylated phosphatidylinositols that are formed as products of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-catalyzed reactions. The pleckstrin homology domain of Akt binds to the plasma membrane-associated phosphatidylinositol (3, 4, 5) trisphosphate or phosphatidylinositol (3, 4) bisphosphate, resulting in the translocation of Akt from the cytosol to the plasma membrane. Membrane-associated Akt is phosphorylated by phosphoinositide-dependent kinase, leading to its activation (20, 22). As predicted, inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase by wortmannin inhibits EGF-stimulated Akt activity in T47D cells (20, 30, 31) (Fig. 3C).


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Both PD098059 and wortmannin inhibited EGF-induced ERK and Akt activation respectively. A, time course of ERK activation in response to EGF was determined as described under "Materials and Methods." B, T47D cells in 10% serum were preincubated with or without 50 µM PD098059 (PD) for 30 min. Cells were then challenged with 1 µg/ml EGF for 10 min. Cells were lysed, and ERK activity was assayed as in A. C, T47D cells in 10% serum were preincubated for 10 min with or without 100 nM wortmannin and then challenged with or without 1 µg/ml EGF. After 30 min, the cells were lysed and assayed for Akt activity. The results are represented as a fold increase over basal levels and representative at least three independent experiments.

Fig. 4 shows that wortmannin but not PD098059 inhibits the ability of EGF to protect T47D cells from Fas-induced apoptosis. The anti-apoptotic function of EGF is completely abrogated by pretreatment with wortmannin (Fig. 4A). In contrast, inhibition of ERK activation has no effect on the ability of EGF to protect against Fas-induced apoptosis. The ability of wortmannin to inhibit the anti-apoptotic function of EGF is mirrored in the regulation of caspase activity (Fig. 4B). The suppression of Fas-induced caspase activity by EGF stimulation of T47D cells is completely inhibited by wortmannin treatment (Fig. 4B). The effect of wortmannin on caspase activation is also demonstrated by wortmannin blocking the ability of EGF to protect Cbl and Akt from caspase-mediated degradation (Fig. 4C).


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Wortmannin, but not PD098059, blocks EGF inhibition of Fasinduced apoptosis. A, T47D cells were incubated with or without 1 µg/ml EGF, 1 µg/ml activating anti-Fas antibody, 100 nM wortmannin, and 50 µM PD098059 (PD) in the indicated combinations for 24 h. The apoptotic index of cells for each combination of treatments was determined. * represents a p value <0.05 using Student's t test for the difference between Fas activation versus Fas + EGF and Fas + EGF + PD098059 treatments. The experiment was repeated three separate times. B, cells treated as in A were lysed and assayed for caspase activity as described under "Material and Methods." Caspase activity was measured as fold increase over basal levels, and the experiments were repeated three times with variability to less than 15%. C, cells treated as in B were lysed, resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and immunoblotted using anti-Cbl or anti-Akt antiserum.

The ability of Akt to protect epithelial cells from Fas-induced apoptosis is also observed in MCF-7 breast adenocarcinoma cells (Fig. 5). As shown in T47D cells, EGF stimulation suppresses Fas-induced apoptosis (Fig. 5A). Stable expression of a constitutively activated Akt in MCF-7 cells lowers the basal apoptotic cell index relative to control MCF-7 cells (Fig. 5B). In contrast, a kinase-inactive form of Akt (Akt K-M) has no effect on the basal apoptotic index of MCF-7 cells. Stimulation of Fas results in a significant apoptotic response in both Akt K-M and control MCF-7 cells. In contrast, expression of the myristoylated constitutively active form of Akt (Akt-myr) strongly protected MCF-7 cells from Fas-induced apoptosis. Thus, activation of Akt seems sufficient to inhibit Fas-induced apoptosis.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Akt activation protects MCF-7 human breast adenocarcinoma cells from Fas-induced apoptosis. A, MCF-7 cells in 10% serum were incubated with or without 1 µg/ml EGF, 1 µg/ml activating anti-Fas antibody, or the combination of EGF + Fas antibody for 48 h. The apoptotic index of cells in each treatment was determined by staining with acridine orange. Error bars represent the S.D. from three experiments. B, stable transfectants of MCF-7 cells having the expression vector without an insert or expressing kinase-inactive Akt (Akt K-M) or constitutively activated Akt (Akt-myr) were incubated with or without 1 µg/ml Fas-activating antibody for 48 h. Apoptosis was determined by acridine orange staining. The results are from three experiments, with error bars showing the S.D. for each condition.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We have shown that EGF stimulation of three different cell lines protects epithelial cells from Fas-induced apoptosis. The activation of Akt appears to be both required and sufficient for the anti-apoptotic function of EGF (Fig. 6). EGF also has been shown to protect rat prostatic epithelial cells and cultured fetal hepatocytes from tumor necrosis factor beta -induced apoptosis (32, 33). In other cell types the potential anti-apoptotic function of EGF is less apparent. In fibroblasts, EGF is not able to significantly protect against UV-B-induced apoptosis unless highly overexpressed (21, 34). In contrast, insulin-like growth factor 1 was able to block UV-B-induced apoptosis (21). Similarly, EGF was not able to block tumor necrosis factor alpha -induced apoptosis in adipocytes (35). The differential ability of EGF to regulate Akt activity in these cell types may explain these differences. Thus, it appears that epithelial cells and fibroblasts have different abilities for EGF to signal anti-apoptotic responses. It is not clear whether this is because of receptor concentration or which EGF receptor family members are present.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Model of EGF protection of Fas-induced apoptosis. EGF receptor (EGFR) activation leads to activation of Raf1 and the ERK pathway. PD098059 compound inhibits the kinase activity of MEK1/2, thereby blocking EGF-induced activation of ERK. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) is also activated by stimulation of the EGF receptor, leading to Akt activation. Wortmannin inhibits phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity, thereby blocking Akt activation. Akt effectively inhibits Fas-induced caspase activity and apoptosis.

It should be noted that even though the ERK pathway did not have an anti-apoptotic function in the three epithelial cell lines we tested, ERK has been shown to have significant survival functions in other cell types. For example, in L929 fibrosarcoma cells and human neutrophils, the ERK pathway prevents tumor necrosis factor alpha  and UV-induced apoptosis, respectively (36-38). Thus, different cell types may use either Akt or ERK signaling pathways for survival in response to different pro-apoptotic stimuli. Recently, it was shown that Akt phosphorylates both Bad and caspase 9, inhibiting their pro-apoptotic activity. The phosphorylation of these proteins appears to be a mechanism for the anti-apoptotic function for Akt (18, 39, 40). The mechanism by which ERK can function to protect specific cell types from apoptosis is not currently defined.

Our finding that in human breast epithelial tumor cells, EGF protects against apoptosis is particularly relevant to understanding the function of EGF receptors in breast cancer. Human breast tumor cells express EGF receptors that contribute to their growth and survival (1, 3, 6). Many breast cancer cells express multiple members of the ErbB family including ErbB1 (EGF receptor) and ErbB2 (Neu) (1, 6). In addition, many breast cancers also express either EGF or transforming growth factor alpha  and are thus able to activate EGF receptors in the tumor cells via autocrine and paracrine mechanisms (41). The stimulation of the Akt-signaling pathway in breast tumors would also be predicted to provide a survival function during the transformation process. Overexpression of ErbB2 receptor by transfection of MDA-MB-435 breast cancer cells resulted in protection of these cells from taxol-induced apoptosis, indicating that EGF receptor stimulation can also confer drug resistance (42). Our results indicate that EGF stimulation of breast cancer cells protects them from Fas-induced apoptosis by a mechanism involving the activation of Akt.

It is important to note that EGF treatment of epithelial cells significantly reduced but did not eliminate Fas-induced apoptosis. The incomplete protection could be because of the fact that we were activating endogenous EGF receptor family members and endogenous Akt. In HEK293, MCF7, and T47D cells, ErbB family members and Akt are expressed at modest levels. Overexpression of an activated form of Akt or overexpression of EGF receptors effectively blocks apoptosis (42). Our study is the first report showing that EGF can significantly protect cells against Fas-induced apoptosis without increasing the expression of EGF-signaling components by transfection.

The finding that EGF protects breast cancer cells from apoptosis is consistent with the recent observations using the anti-Neu (ErbB2) antibody, Herceptin (4). Herceptin blocks EGF signaling and induces apoptosis of breast cancer cells and is now in use clinically in the treatment of breast cancer. It is possible that inhibition of the Akt stimulatory pathway will further sensitize cells to Herceptin-induced apoptosis (4). Combined with chemotherapy, multimodal treatment would effectively induce apoptosis in part by making the tumor cells more sensitive to Fas activation. The ability to define the anti-apoptotic potential of signaling pathways like that for Akt in different tumor types should allow enhanced efficiency of treatments involving drugs like Herceptin, DNA damaging drugs, and microtubule toxins that induce the apoptosis of human tumors. Future studies will evaluate the ability of EGF to protect cells against chemotherapeutic drugs in vitro and in xenograft tumor models in nude mice.

    FOOTNOTES

* Supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DK 48845, DK 37871, GM 30324, and CA 58157.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ A Leukemia Society Fellow. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Program in Molecular Signal Transduction, Division of Basic Sciences, National Jewish Medical and Research Center, 1400 Jackson St., Denver, CO 80206. Tel.: 303-398-1772; Fax: 303-398-1225; E-mail: johnsonlab{at}njc.org.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: EGF, epidermal growth factor; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; HEK, human embryonic kidney epithelial cells; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
  1. Voldborg, B. R., Damstrup, L., Spang-Thomsen, M., and Poulsen, H. S. (1997) Ann. Oncol. 8, 1197-1206[Abstract]
  2. Earp, H. S., Dawson, T. L., Li, X., and Yu, H. (1995) Breast Cancer Res . Treat. 35, 115-132[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Chrysogelos, S. A., and Dickson, R. B. (1994) Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 29, 29-40[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Ross, J. S., and Fletcher, J. A. (1998) Stem Cells 16, 413-428[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Rusch, V., Mendelsohn, J., and Dmitrovsky, E. (1996) Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 7, 133-141[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Cohen, B. D., Siegall, C. B., Bacus, S., Foy, L., Green, J. M., Hellstrom, I., Hellstrom, K. E., and Fell, H. P. (1998) Biochem. Soc. Symp. 63, 199-210[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Fox, S. B., Smith, K., Hollyer, J., Greenall, M., Hastrich, D., and Harris, A. L. (1994) Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 29, 41-49[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Lee, J. M., and Bernstein, A. (1995) Cancer Metastasis Rev. 14, 149-161[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Gruber, J., and Greil, R. (1994) Int. Arch. Allergy Appl. Immunol. 105, 368-373
  10. Desoize, B. (1994) Anticancer Res. 14, 2291-2294[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Hodge, S., Novembre, F. J., Whetter, L., Gelbard, H. A., and Dewhurst, S. (1998) Virology 252, 354-363[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Walker, P. R., Saas, P., and Dietrich, P. Y. (1998) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 10, 564-572[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Freiberg, R. A., Spencer, D. M., Choate, K. A., Peng, P. D., Schreiber, S. L., Crabtree, G. R., and Khavari, P. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 31666-31669[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Le-Niculescu, H., Bonfoco, E., Kasuya, Y., Claret, F. X., Green, D. R., and Karin, M. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 751-763[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Faris, M., Latinis, K. M., Kempiak, S. J., Koretzky, G. A., and Nel, A. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 5414-5424[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Thornberry, N. A., and Lazebnik, Y. (1998) Science 281, 1312-1316[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Jarpe, M. B., Widmann, C., Knall, C., Schlesinger, T. K., Gibson, S., Yujiri, T., Fanger, G. R., Gelfand, E. W., and Johnson, G. L. (1998) Oncogene 17, 1475-1482[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Cardone, M. H., Roy, N., Stennicke, H. R., Salvesen, G. S., Franke, T. F., Stanbridge, E., Frisch, S., and Reed, J. C. (1998) Science 282, 1318-1321[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Widmann, C., Gibson, S., and Johnson, G. L. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 7141-7147[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Burgering, B. M., and Coffer, P. J. (1995) Nature 376, 599-602[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Kulik, G., Klippel, A., and Weber, M. J. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 1595-1606[Abstract]
  22. Coffer, P. J., Jin, J., and Woodgett, J. R. (1998) Biochem. J. 335, 1-13[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Franke, T. F., Kaplan, D. R., and Cantley, L. C. (1997) Cell 88, 435-437[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Downward, J. (1998) Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 10, 262-267[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. O'Connor, R. (1998) Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 62, 137-166[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Anderson, C. N. G., and Tolkovsky, A. M. (1999) J. Neurosci. 19, 664-673[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Berra, E., Diaz-Meco, M. T., and Moscat, J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 10792-10797[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Sutherland, C. L., Heath, A. W., Pelech, S. L., Young, P. R., and Gold, M. R. (1996) J. Immunol. 157, 3381-3390[Abstract]
  29. Dudley, D. T., Pang, L., Decker, S. J., Bridges, A. J., and Saltiel, A. R. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 7686-7689[Abstract]
  30. Hausler, P., Papoff, G., Eramo, A., Reif, K., Cantrell, D. A., and Ruberti, G. (1998) Eur. J. Immunol. 28, 57-69[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Egert, S., Nguyen, N., Brosius, F. C., III, and Schwaiger, M. (1997) Cardiovasc. Res. 35, 283-293[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Fabregat, I., Sanchez, A., Alvarez, A. M., Nakamura, T., and Benito, M. (1996) FEBS Lett. 384, 14-18[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Ilio, K. Y., Sensibar, J. A., and Lee, C. (1995) J. Androl. 16, 482-490[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Antonyak, M. A., Moscatello, D. K., and Wong, A. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 2817-2822[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Porras, A., Alvarez, A. M., Valladares, A., and Benito, M. (1997) FEBS Lett. 416, 324-328[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Frasch, S. C., Nick, J. A., Fadok, V. A., Bratton, D. L., Worthen, G. S., and Henson, P. M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 8389-8397[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Boone, E., Vandevoorde, V., De Wilde, G., and Haegeman, G. (1998) FEBS Lett. 441, 275-280[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Gardner, A. M., and Johnson, G. L. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 14560-14566[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Datta, S. R., Dudek, H., Tao, X., Masters, S., Fu, H., Gotoh, Y., and Greenberg, M. E. (1997) Cell 91, 231-241[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. del Peso, L., Gonzalez-Garcia, M., Page, C., Herrera, R., and Nunez, G. (1997) Science 278, 687-689[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Sterle, M., Kreft, M. E., and Batista, U. (1997) Biol. Cell 89, 263-271[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Yu, D., Jing, T., Liu, B., Yao, J., Tan, M., McDonnell, T. J., and Hung, M. C. (1998) Mol. Cell 2, 581-591[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.