Yap1 and Skn7 Control Two Specialized Oxidative Stress Response Regulons in Yeast*

Jaekwon LeeDagger §, Christian Godon§, Gilles Lagniel, Daniel SpectorDagger , Jérome Garinparallel , Jean Labarre, and Michel B. ToledanoDagger **

From the  Service de Biochimie et Génétique Moléculaire, Bâtiment 142, CEA/Saclay, F-91191, Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France, the Dagger  Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08855, and the parallel  Departement de Biologie Moléculaire et Structurale, CEA-Grenoble, F-38054 Cedex 9, France

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Yap1 and Skn7 are two yeast transcriptional regulators that co-operate to activate thioredoxin (TRX2) and thioredoxin reductase (TRR1) in response to redox stress signals. Although they are both important for resistance to H2O2, only Yap1 is important for cadmium resistance, whereas Skn7 has a negative effect upon this response. The respective roles of Yap1 and Skn7 in the induction of defense genes by H2O2 were analyzed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Yap1 controls a large oxidative stress response regulon of at least 32 proteins. Fifteen of these proteins also require the presence of Skn7 for their induction by H2O2. Although about half of the Yap1 target genes do not contain a consensus Yap1 recognition motif, the control of one such gene, TSA1, involves the binding of Yap1 and Skn7 to its promoter in vitro. The co-operative control of the oxidative stress response by Yap1 and Skn7 delineates two gene subsets. Remarkably, these two gene subsets separate antioxidant scavenging enzymes from the metabolic pathways regenerating the main cellular reducing power, glutathione and NADPH. Such a specialization may explain, at least in part, the dissociated function of Yap1 and Skn7 in H2O2 and cadmium resistance.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Aerobic organisms have to maintain a reduced cellular redox environment in the face of the prooxidative conditions of aerobic life. The incomplete reduction of oxygen to water during respiration leads to the formation of redox-active oxygen intermediates such as the superoxide anion radical (Obardot 2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and the hydroxyl radical (for review see Refs. 1-3). Redox-active oxygen intermediates are also produced during the beta -oxidation of fatty acids by exposure to radiation, light, metals, and redox active drugs. Redox-active oxygen intermediates perturbate the cell redox status and when present in high levels can induce toxic damage to lipids, proteins, and DNA, eventually leading to cell death. Living organisms constantly sense and adapt to such redox perturbations. The exposure of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to low doses of H2O2 or Obardot 2-generating drugs switches on within minutes a resistance to toxic doses of these oxidants (4-6). The adaptive response to H2O2 involves a change in the expression of at least 167 proteins (7). Such a rapid and widespread genomic response suggests the existence of specific control pathways.

In S. cerevisiae, the transcription factors Yap1 (8, 9) and Skn7 (10, 11) have been implicated in a cellular pathway that controls the oxidative stress response. Yap1 is a bZIP DNA-binding protein of the AP-1 family (12) that binds the sequence T(T/G)ACTAA termed the Yap1 response element (YRE) (9, 13, 14).1 Skn7 contains a receiver domain found in the family of two-component signal transduction systems of prokaryotes and a domain similar to the DNA-binding domain of heat shock factor (Hsf1) (15, 16). Skn7 is also capable of specific DNA binding, but its cognate DNA sequence has not been identified precisely (11). Strains inactivated for either one of these regulators are hypersensitive to killing by H2O2 (9, 10, 11, 17). This oxidative stress phenotype is related to the role of Yap1 and Skn7 in controlling the induction of several defense genes by H2O2. Yap1 controls the expression of GSH1 (gamma -glutamylcysteine synthetase) (13), TRX2 (thioredoxin) (9), GLR1 (glutathione reductase) (18), and YCF1 (yeast cadmium factor, a glutathione S-conjugate pump)(19). More recently, Morgan showed that the induction of TRX2 and TRR1 (thioredoxin reductase) by H2O2 requires a co-operation between Yap1 and Skn7 (11). YAP1 function can be activated by H2O2, diamide, and diethylmaleate (9, 20), and this activation is attributed to a redox stress-imposed nuclear redistribution of the protein involving the nuclear export receptor Crm1 (Xpo1) (21, 22).

Yap1 is also important in cadmium tolerance because deletion of its gene results in a cadmium-hypersensitive phenotype (19, 20, 23). This function is attributed to the control by Yap1 of GSH1 (13) and of YCF1 (19). In addition to its involvement in the oxidative stress response, Skn7 is implicated in the control of cell wall biosynthesis, cell cycle, and the osmotic stress response. Overexpression of SKN7 can suppress the cell wall assembly mutation kre9 (24) and the growth defect associated with a pkc1 null deletion (15). Overexpression of SKN7 also suppresses the lethality associated with loss of the G1 transcription factors SBF and MBF (16). Skn7 is modulated by the Sln1-Ypd1 osmosensor and contributes to regulation of the HOG osmo-stress pathway (25). The involvement of Skn7 into such diverse pathways raises the question of the possible connection between these pathways.

We sought to further analyze the co-operative functions of Yap1 and Skn7 in the control of the oxidative and cadmium stress responses and found that these two regulators do not always act together in these stress responses. Although both Yap1 and Skn7 are important for resistance to H2O2, only Yap1 is important for cadmium resistance, whereas Skn7 is not only dispensable but appears to negatively affect this response. The role of Yap1 and Skn7 in the induction of defense genes by H2O2 was further analyzed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. The data presented here identify, within a large Yap1 stress response regulon, a gene subset that also requires Skn7 for its control. This partition of the Yap1 regulon correlates with two distinct classes of defense genes. Such a specialization within the oxidative stress response may explain the dissociated function of Yap1 and Skn7 in H2O2 and cadmium resistance.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Yeast Strains, Growth Conditions, and Reagents-- All studies were performed with the wild type strain YPH98 (26) (MATa ura3-52 lys2-801amber ade2-101ochre trp1-Delta 1 leu2-Delta 1) and its isogenic derivatives yap1Delta -1 (yap1::LEU2), skn7Delta -1 (skn7::TRP1), yap1Delta -1, and skn7Delta -1 (yap1::LEU2, skn7::TRP1). The composition of synthetic complete, rich broth, and glucose selective media are described elsewhere (27). Strains were transformed by electroporation as described (28). H2O2, t-BOOH, and cadmium sulfate were purchased from Sigma. The 12CA5 anti-HA and the 9E10 anti-Myc monoclonal antibody were purchased from Roche Molecular Biochemicals.

Gene Disruptions and Plasmid Constructions-- Standard protocols and buffers were used (29). Gene disruptions were performed by the one-step gene disruption technique (28). pSKN7 is a YEp351 plasmid carrying a 3.5-kb genomic fragment containing the entire SKN7 gene (24). pSKN7-HA is a tagged version of SKN7 in which the HA epitope was introduced at the SKN7 PstI site 28 codons downstream of the ATG (15). The skn7::TRP1 construct used to create skn7Delta -1 lacks an internal 1.5-kb PvuII-HincII fragment of the wild type SKN7 gene, which has been replaced by the TRP1 gene (24). The yap1::LEU2 construct used to create yap1Delta -1 was prepared by removing the YAP1 coding sequence from the BamHI site (+186) to the KpnI site (+1650) relative to the ATG and replacing it with the LEU2 gene. pYAP1 was constructed by subcloning a 2.5-kb EcoRI DNA fragment carrying the entire YAP1 gene (12) into pRS426. pMF6(X-H) is a PUC18 plasmid lacking the AccI polylinker site and carrying the same 2.5-kb EcoRI YAP1 fragment. To generate pYAP1-9Myc, a polymerase chain reaction-amplified 390-bp sequence encoding 9 Myc epitopes was first introduced in vector pMF6(X-H) into the YAP1 AccI site located two codons downstream of the ATG; The YAP1-9Myc fusion was then subcloned at the EcoRI site of pRS426 to generate pYAP1-9Myc. The functionality of the YAP1-9Myc construct was evaluated by its ability to rescue the H2O2-hypersensitive phenotype of yap1Delta -1. The TSA1-lacZ gene fusions were constructed as follows: a 4.5-kb DNA fragment spanning the entire lacZ coding sequence from the BamHI site, two codons downstream of the ATG to a KpnI site approximately 1 kb from the stop codon, was subcloned into pRS424 to generate pMT1. A NaeII to KpnI 328-bp plasmid fragment containing the alpha  peptide lacZ sequence was then removed from pMT1 to generate pMT11. TSA1 promoter fragments corresponding to -1000, -837, -403, -243, and -204 to +1 relative to the ATG were amplified by polymerase chain reaction from genomic DNA and subcloned between the XhoI and BamHI sites of pMT11.

Sensitivity Assays-- Patch assays were performed as follows: 10-µl aliquots containing approximately 2 × 103 cells of an overnight culture were spotted on rich broth or synthetic complete solid plates containing H2O2, t-BOOH, or cadmium sulfate at the indicated concentration. Plates were monitored after 3-6 days incubation at 30 °C.

Northern Blot Analysis-- Yeast cells from overnight culture were diluted to an A600 of 0.01 in synthetic complete medium and incubated with shaking at 30 °C until they reached an A600 of 0.3. The cells were then aliquoted and incubated in the absence or in the presence of H2O2 (0.2 mM) for 20 min. Total RNA was prepared by the hot phenol method (30). For each condition tested, 20-µg RNA samples were loaded per lane on an agarose gel containing formaldehyde, separated by electrophoresis, transferred to a nylon membrane (Bio-Rad), and hybridized with the indicated random primed (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) 32P-labeled DNA probe. Hybridization of each blot with a small nuclear RNA U3 (SNR17A) specific 32P-labeled DNA probe served as a RNA loading control. Pre-hybridization, hybridization, and washes were carried out as described (29). Hybridized membranes were exposed for autoradiography.

Yeast Crude Extracts and Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays-- Yeast crude extracts used in EMSAs were prepared as follows. Cells were grown to an A600 of 0.3 and were left untreated or were treated with H2O2 (0.6 mM) for 5 min and harvested. Extracts were prepared by glass bead disruption as described previously (7), except for the use of a modified breakage buffer containing 200 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 10 mM MgCl2, 10% glycerol, complete mixture inhibitor (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). The DNA binding reactions were carried out in 1× TC buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, pH 8, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.1% (v/v) CHAPS, 10% (v/v) glycerol) with 20 µg of crude yeast extracts, 5-15 fmol [32P]ATP-labeled probe, 1 µg of poly(dI-dC) (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in a total volume of 20 µl. The binding reaction was incubated for 5 min at room temperature and subjected to electrophoresis in a 6% polyacrylamide gel (acrylamide/N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide weight ratio, 27.5:1) in 45 mM Tris/45 mM boric acid/1 mM EDTA for 1 h at 200 V.

Measurement of the H2O2 Response by Two-dimensional Gel Electrophoresis-- Measurement of the H2O2 response was carried out as described previously (7). Basically, mid-log cells (A600 = 0.3) were exposed or not to H2O2 (0.2 mM) for 15 min, pulse labeled with [35S]methionine for another 15 min, and harvested. An equal aliquot of 3H-labeled cells was mixed to the 35S-labeled cells and served as an internal protein concentration standard for each two-dimensional gel spot. Cell mixtures were extracted and subjected to comparative two-dimensional gel analysis. Accordingly, the previously identified 71 proteins of the H2O2 stimulon were analyzed in wild type and isogenic yap1Delta -1, and skn7Delta -1. Uninduced and H2O2-induced synthesis rate indexes (ratio of individual [35S]/[3H] spot ratios to the Act1p [35S]/[3H] spot ratio) were calculated in each strain for the 71 H2O2-stimulated proteins.

Computer Search of Yap1 and Skn7 Upstream Recognition Sequences-- Specific DNA sequences were searched within 1 kilobase from the initiation codon of identified genes with the Saccharomyces Genome Data Base package. Searches were done with the following query sequences: T(T/G)ACTAA, which corresponds to the known Yap1 recognition sequences (YRE) (9, 13, 14), and CAGCAGCCGAAAAGA, which correspond to a 23-bp TRX2 promoter sequence capable of binding Skn7 in vitro (11).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Yap1 and Skn7 Have Distinctive Roles in the Oxidative and Metal Stress Responses-- Although strains carrying deletions of YAP1 (yap1Delta -1)or SKN7 (skn7Delta -1) are both hypersensitive to killing by H2O2 (9-11), skn7Delta -1 can tolerate higher concentrations of H2O2 (Fig. 1A). The same phenotypic profile is seen in the tolerance of t-BOOH (Fig. 1B). Another functional distinction is the ability of YAP1 overexpression to partially rescue the skn7Delta -1 peroxide-hypersensitive phenotype, whereas SKN7 overexpression has no effect in yap1Delta -1 (Fig. 1B). Analysis of the cadmium tolerance further demonstrates the distinctive roles of Yap1 and Skn7 in controlling stress responses (Fig. 1C). Whereas yap1Delta -1 is hypersensitive to cadmium (19, 20, 23), skn7Delta -1 is significantly more resistant than the wild type strain to this toxic metal. The double delete yap1Delta -1,skn7Delta -1 is hypersensitive to cadmium, suggesting that the skn7Delta -1 cadmium hyperresistance phenotype is dependent upon YAP1. Therefore, Yap1 and Skn7 have distinctive roles in peroxide stress tolerance and opposite effects upon cadmium tolerance, with Yap1 acting positively and Skn7 acting negatively. A negative role for Skn7 is also suggested by the decreased cadmium tolerance observed upon overexpression of SKN7 (not shown). These results prompted us to evaluate the role of Yap1 and Skn7 in the control of known H2O2-inducible target genes.


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Yap1 and Skn7 have distinctive roles in the oxidative and metal stress responses. A, wild type (WT) and isogenic yap1Delta -1 (Delta yap1), skn7Delta -1 (Delta skn7), and yap1Delta -1,skn7Delta -1 (Delta yap1Delta skn7) strains were compared by the patch assay for their ability to grow on rich broth solid medium containing H2O2 at the indicated concentration. For each strain, 10 µl of an overnight culture (A600 = 2-3) diluted to 2 × 103 cells were spotted on tester plates. B, wild type and isogenic yap1Delta -1 (Delta yap1) and skn7Delta -1 (Delta skn7) not carrying (WT, Delta yap1, Delta skn7) or carrying an episomal plasmid containing either YAP1 (pYAP1) or SKN7 (pSKN7) were compared by the patch assay for their ability to grow on rich broth solid medium containing t-BOOH at the indicated concentration. C, wild type (WT) and isogenic yap1Delta -1 (Delta yap1), skn7Delta -1 (Delta skn7), and yap1Delta -1,skn7Delta -1 (Delta yap1Delta skn7) strains were compared by the patch assay for their ability to grow on synthetic complete solid medium containing cadmium sulfate at the indicated concentration.

Yap1 and Skn7 Do Not Always Function Together in the Activation of H2O2-inducible Target Genes-- Yap1 and Skn7 co-operate to activate TRX2 and TRR1 in response to H2O2 (11). We thus evaluated by Northern blot the respective roles of Yap1 and Skn7 in the control of three other known Yap1 targets, SSA1 (31), GSH1 (13), and GLR1 (18), and of four other H2O2-inducible genes, TSA1 (TSA or peroxiredoxin), AHP1 (an alkyl hydroperoxide reductase) (32), CCP1 (cytochrome c peroxidase), and HSP82 (7) (Fig. 2). The genes analyzed were all potently induced by H2O2 in wild type cells, and this induction was abolished in yap1Delta -1 (Fig. 2, A and B). In skn7Delta -1 cells, the induction by H2O2 was also abolished for TSA1, CCP1, TRR1, HSP82, and SSA1 and significantly diminished for TRX2 and AHP1 (Fig. 2A). In contrast, induction of GLR1 and GSH1 by H2O2 was actually stronger in skn7Delta -1 than in wild type cells (Fig. 2B). However, in yap1Delta -1,skn7Delta -1 double null cells, the induction of GSH1 by H2O2 was totally abolished, demonstrating that the H2O2-superinduced levels seen in skn7Delta -1 cells are dependent upon YAP1. Therefore, Yap1 and Skn7 co-operate in the control of several H2O2 target genes but have opposite effects in the control of other H2O2 target genes, with Yap1 acting positively and Skn7 acting negatively. These results may explain, at least in part, the opposite functions of Yap1 and Skn7 in cadmium tolerance.


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Distinct functions of Yap1 and Skn7 in the activation of H2O2-inducible target genes. A, Northern blot analysis of Yap1 and Skn7-dependent target genes. Total RNA was isolated from exponentially growing (A600 0.3) wild type (WT) and isogenic yap1Delta -1 (Delta yap1) and skn7Delta -1 (Delta skn7) cells, which had not been treated or were treated for 20 min with H2O2 (0.2 mM) as indicated. The resulting RNA were subjected to Northern blot probed for the indicated genes and for U3 as a loading control, as described under "Materials and Methods." B, Northern blot analysis of Yap1-dependent and Skn7-independent target genes (same as in A). C, total RNA was isolated from a wild type and isogenic yap1Delta -1,skn7Delta -1 (Delta yap1Delta skn7) strains (same as in A and B).

Yap1 Controls a Large Regulon of Thirty-two H2O2-inducible Proteins-- To further dissect the intricate functions of Yap1 and Skn7 in the control of the oxidative and metal stress responses, we searched for other target genes by comparative two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of total soluble yeast proteins. We recently identified with this method 71 proteins whose synthesis rate is significantly increased minutes after exposure to H2O2 (7). We sought to identify among these proteins those whose induction by H2O2 would be lost or significantly diminished in yap1Delta -1. Exponentially growing wild type and yap1Delta -1 cells were pulse-labeled after exposure to H2O2 for 15 min and then subjected to two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (Fig. 3, A-C). Uninduced and H2O2-induced synthesis rate indexes of the 71 H2O2 targets were calculated in yap1Delta -1 and divided by those of the wild type strain (yap1Delta -1/WT). 31 proteins with a yap1Delta -1/WT-induced synthesis rate index ratio equal to or below the value of 0.6 were considered as dependent upon Yap1 for their induction by H2O2. Their synthesis rate indexes are represented in Fig. 4. These proteins were sorted into functional classes (Table I). The Yap1 regulon includes most of the oxidant scavenging enzymes. These are, in addition to those mentioned above, cytosolic catalase (Ctt1p), copper/zinc and manganese superoxide dismutases (Sod1p and Sod2p), YDR453Cp, and YOL151Wp. YDR453Wp is an AhpC/TSA family member, and YOL151Wp is similar to plant NADPH isoflavonoid reductases shown to rescue the diamide hypersensitivity phenotype of a yap1 null strain (33). The Yap1 regulon also includes several carbohydrate metabolism enzymes, a few heat shock proteins and proteases, amino acid metabolism enzymes, and other unclassified or unknown proteins.


View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Comparative analysis of the H2O2 response by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in strains deleted for YAP1 and SKN7. Autoradiograms of two-dimensional gels performed with total yeast extracts from [35S]methionine-labeled wild type (A and B), yap1Delta -1 (C), and skn7Delta -1 (D) cells as described under "Materials and Methods." Extracts were prepared from control untreated cells (A) or from cells exposed to H2O2 (0.2 mM) for 15 min (B-D). A central region of the autoradiograms was blown up, and proteins were indicated by their name and black arrows (Yap1 and Skn7-dependent proteins) or white arrows (Yap1-dependent and Skn7-independent proteins).


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Basal and H2O2-stimulated synthesis rate indexes of the proteins of the Yap1-controlled regulon. Histogram representation of uninduced (black bars) and H2O2-induced (white bars) synthesis rate indexes calculated in wild type (bars 1), yap1Delta -1 (bars 2), and skn7Delta -1 (bars 3) cells as described under "Materials and Methods." For each protein spot, values were normalized to the wild type uninduced level that was arbitrarily given the value of 1. The names of proteins are indicated above the histograms.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Identification of proteins dependent upon Yap1, Skn7, or both regulators for their induction by H2O2

A Large Subset of the YAP1 Regulon Is Dependent upon Skn7-- Skn7 target genes were similarly identified by comparative two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (Fig. 3, A-C). Thirteen proteins with a skn7Delta -1 to wild type (skn7Delta -1/WT)-induced synthesis rate index ratio equal to or below 0.6 were considered as dependent upon Skn7 for their induction by H2O2 (Table I). Their synthesis rates indexes are represented in Fig. 4. Most of these proteins were also identified as Yap1 target genes. However, two of them were not identified as Yap1 targets. Conversely, several Yap1 target genes were still normally induced or even superinduced in the skn7 null strain (Fig. 4). Hence, Skn7 appears to partition the Yap1 regulon into three distinct gene subsets. The first subset consists of 13 Yap1- and Skn7-dependent proteins. It includes most of the Yap1-dependent oxidant scavenging enzymes and a few other activities. The second subset contains 19 Yap1-dependent but Skn7-independent proteins and includes Glr1p, Zwf1p, Tal1p, Cys3p, and, as shown by Northern blot, GSH1. The third subset consist of two Skn7-dependent but Yap1-independent targets.

There was an excellent correlation between protein and mRNA levels for most of the genes analyzed. However, for Pgm2p and Dnm1p, in mutant strains mRNA levels appeared normal despite altered protein synthesis rates (not shown). These discrepancies between mRNA and protein levels may indicate the existence of post-transcriptional control mechanisms.

Identification of Upstream Regulatory Sequences for Yap1 and Skn7-- Approximately half of the Yap1 target genes contain a YRE motif within 1 kb upstream from their translation start, whereas the other half do not contain such a motif (Table I) (see "Materials and Methods"). We thus analyzed one such YRE negative target, the TSA1 gene, for the presence of a Yap1/Skn7-responsive element. A translational fusion between a 1-kb region upstream of the TSA1 translational start and the bacterial lacZ gene was created, and its expression was analyzed by Northern blot (Fig. 5A). This promoter-lacZ fusion was inducible by H2O2 in wild type but not in yap1Delta -1 or in skn7Delta -1 cells, demonstrating that it recapitulates the regulation of the TSA1 gene. A 5' deletion analysis showed that a minimal promoter sequence spanning 204 bp from the translational start (-204/+1) retained the H2O2 inducibility of lacZ gene expression in wild type cells (Fig. 5B). Furthermore, this induction was abolished in yap1Delta -1 and diminished in skn7Delta -1. A higher constitutive expression from this minimal promoter fragment was also observed. These data suggest that the -204/+1 minimal promoter fragment retains the Yap1- and Skn7-dependent H2O2 induction of the TSA1 gene but may have lost a repression mechanism imposed on the full TSA1 promoter.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Identification of a Yap1- and Skn7-controlled, H2O2-responsive element in the TSA1 gene. Northern blot analysis of -1000/+1 (A) and -204/+1 (B) TSA1-lacZ fusions. Schematic representations of the two TSA1-lacZ fusion constructs are represented below each graph. Total RNA was isolated from exponentially growing (A600 = 0.3) wild type (WT), and isogenic yap1Delta -1 (Delta yap1), and skn7Delta -1 (Delta skn7) cells, carrying TSA1-lacZ fusions as indicated. Cells were not (black bars) or were treated for 20 min with H2O2 (0.2 mM) (shaded bars). The resulting RNA were subjected to Northern blot probed with a lacZ probe and with U3 as a loading control. Autoradiograms were quantified with the ImageQuant software. The lacZ specific signals were normalized to the U3 control and represented in a histogram.

To examine whether Yap1 and Skn7 affected the expression of the TSA1 gene by direct binding to its promoter, we performed EMSA with a probe corresponding to the TSA1 promoter -204/+1 fragment. A H2O2-inducible slow migrating binding complex (complex a) was seen with wild type but not with yap1Delta -1,skn7Delta -1 cell extracts (Fig. 6A) or with yap1Delta -1 or skn7Delta -1 cell extracts (not shown). The same but more intense shifted complex was already seen prior exposure to H2O2 with YAP1 and SKN7 overexpressing cell extracts, suggesting that it contains Yap1 and Skn7 (Fig. 6B, lanes 7 and 8). Note that H2O2 treatment resulted in a slight change in the mobility of complex a. The presence of Yap1 and Skn7 in complex a could be demonstrated with the use of specific monoclonal antibodies (mAb). When the EMSAs were performed with extracts expressing a Myc epitope-tagged version of Yap1, adding the anti-Myc mAb to the binding reaction resulted in the decrease and supershift of complex a (Fig. 6C, lanes 1 and 2). Similarly, adding the anti-HA mAb to EMSAs performed with extracts expressing a HA epitope-tagged version of Skn7 (Fig. 6D, lanes 1 and 2) or to extracts overexpressing both Yap1 and the HA-tagged Skn7 (lanes 5 and 6) resulted in the complete disappearance of complex a.


View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Direct binding of Yap1 and Skn7 to the TSA1 promoter. All EMSAs were performed with the -204/+1 TSA1 probe. A, EMSA using crude extracts prepared from uninduced (lanes 1 and 3) and H2O2-induced (lanes 2 and 4) wild type (lanes 1 and 2) and yap1Delta -1,skn7Delta -1 (lanes 3 and 4) cells as described under "Material and Methods." The H2O2-inducible complex containing Yap1 and Skn7 is indicated with an arrow as a. B, EMSA performed with crude extracts from uninduced (lanes 1, 3, 5, and 7) and H2O2-induced (lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8) wild type (lanes 1 and 2), skn7Delta -1 carrying pYAP1 (lanes 3 and 4), yap1Delta -1 carrying pSKN7 (lanes 5 and 6), and wild type cells carrying both pYAP1 and pSKN7 (lanes 7 and 8). Complexes sensitive to the presence or the absence of Yap1 are indicated with arrows as a, b, and c. Complexes sensitive to the presence or the absence of Skn7 are indicated with arrows as a and d. C, EMSA performed with extracts prepared from H2O2-induced wild type (lanes 1 and 2) and skn7Delta -1 carrying pYAP1-9Myc (lanes 3 and 4). The 9E10 anti-Myc monoclonal antibody was added to the binding reaction in lanes 2 and 4. D, EMSA performed with extracts prepared from H2O2-induced wild type (lanes 1 and 2), yap1Delta -1 carrying pSKN7-HA (lanes 3 and 4) and wild type cells carrying both pYAP1 and pSKN7-HA. The 12CA5 anti-HA monoclonal antibody was added to the binding reaction in lanes 2, 4, and 6.

Extracts from skn7Delta -1 cells overexpressing Yap1 did not generate complex a, but instead two faster migrating complexes (complexes b and c) (Fig. 6B, lanes 3 and 4). These two complexes were also seen, in addition to complex a, with extracts from cells overexpressing both Yap1 and Skn7 (lanes 7 and 8). We conclude that they both contain Yap1 because they could be supershifted with anti-Myc mAb (Fig. 6C, lanes 3 and 4). Extracts from yap1Delta -1 cells overexpressing Skn7 also did not result in the formation of complex a but instead resulted in the formation of a faster migrating complex (complex d) (Fig. 6B, lanes 5 and 6). Complex d contains Skn7, as demonstrated by its disappearance when anti-HA mAb are added to the binding reaction (Fig. 6C, lanes 3 and 4). We conclude that both Skn7 (complex d) and Yap1 (complex b and c) can bind directly and independently to the TSA1 promoter fragment and can also form a ternary complex (complex a) with this fragment. Identical EMSA were observed with a 400-bp-long TSA1 promoter fragment (-400/+1) and with a probe corresponding to the TRX2 promoter (-300/+1) (not shown).

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The respective contributions of the Yap1 and Skn7 transcription factors to the control of the S. cerevisiae response to oxidative stress and metal toxicity were analyzed. Yap1 controls a large regulon of at least 32 proteins, accounting for approximately half of the 71 identified proteins of the H2O2 stimulon (7). As shown for TRX2 and TRR1 (11), 15 of these proteins also require the presence of both Yap1 and Skn7 for their induction by H2O2. Hence, two subsets of the Yap1 regulon can be delineated. Interestingly, these two gene subsets distinguish the antioxidant scavenging enzymes from the metabolic pathways that regenerate the main cellular reducing power, GSH and NADPH. These two gene subsets appear to carry specialized defense functions as suggested by the fact that although both Yap1 and Skn7 are essential for resistance to peroxides (H2O2 and t-BOOH, a synthetic alkyl hydroperoxide), only Yap1 is required for resistance to cadmium.

The Genes Required for Resistance to Peroxides Are Specified in the Entire Yap1 Regulon-- The Skn7-dependent subset of the Yap1 regulon specifies genes important for peroxide tolerance. However, the more severe H2O2-hypersensitive phenotype of yap1Delta -1 versus skn7Delta -1 indicates that, in addition to the Skn7-dependent gene subset, activities of the Skn7-independent Yap1 regulon play a role in peroxide tolerance.

The partition of the Yap1 regulon by Skn7 correlates with two distinct classes of defense activities: (i) The Skn7-dependent gene subset includes most of the known yeast redox-active oxygen intermediate scavenging activities. These are cytosolic catalase (CTT1), cytochrome c peroxidase (CCP1), Tsa1p (TSA1) or peroxiredoxin (34) and its homologue YDR453Cp (7), an alkyl hydroperoxide reductase (AHP1) also related to the AhpC/TSA family (32), thioredoxin 2 (TRX2), thioredoxin reductase (TRR1), copper/zinc (SOD1), and manganese (SOD2) superoxide dismutases. Therefore, three yeast proteins of the AhpC/TSA peroxiredoxin family, which are believed to reduce H2O2 with electrons donated by NADPH via thioredoxin (TRX2) and thioredoxin reductase (TRR1) (32, 35, 36), together with their essential cofactors Trx2p and Trr1p, are coordinately controlled by the same H2O2-inducible control mechanism. Consistent with their H2O2 inducibility, the participation of CTT1, TRX2, TSA1, AHP1, and TRR1, in yeast peroxide protection is demonstrated by the increased sensitivity of the corresponding null mutants to killing by these oxidants (9, 32, 35-38). In contrast, the presence of Sod1p and Sod2p in the H2O2-inducible Yap1 regulon is not expected, because both sod1 and sod2 null strains, although hypersensitive to killing by Obardot 2-generating drugs, retain a proper resistance to H2O2 (40, 41). (ii) The Skn7-independent gene subset comprises several activities of glutathione and pentose phosphate pathways. Cystathionine gamma  lyase (CYS3) generates cysteine, a precursor of glutathione (GSH), from cystathionine. gamma -Glutamyl cysteine synthase (GSH1) is the rate-limiting enzyme in GSH biosynthesis, and NADPH-dependent glutathione reductase (GLR1) acts to recycle oxidized GSH (GSSG). Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (ZWF1) regulates the carbon flow through the pentose phosphate pathway by catalyzing its first oxidative step, and transaldolase (TAL1) catalyzes the interconversion of pentose phosphates that have been generated in the oxidative part of this pathway (42). A set of four other proteins of this gene subset could be also involved in the maintenance of the pyrimidine redox balance. These are a putative NADPH dehydrogenase (Oye3p), two proteins with similarity to alcohol dehydrogenase (YMR318C and YNL134C), and YDR032C, which encodes a member of a new family of flavodoxin-like proteins (43). The GSH pathway is most likely involved in peroxide resistance by the reduction of peroxides by glutathione peroxidase using the pentose phosphate pathway as the primary source of NADPH, the electron donor system for glutathione and thioredoxin reductases. The importance of GSH1, GLR1, ZWF1, and TAL1 in the yeast cellular tolerance of H2O2 is demonstrated by the increased sensitivity of their null mutants to this oxidant (18, 44-48). Other activities are also part of this gene subset (Table I). Their role in the tolerance of H2O2 has been recently discussed (7).

The yeast peroxide stress response is different from that of Escherichia coli and Salmonella tiphymurium, which involves a H2O2-inducible regulon controlled by the regulator OxyR (49). The OxyR-controlled regulon includes katG (hydroperoxidase I), ahpCF (an alkyl hydroperoxide reductase of the AhpC/TSA family), dps (a nonspecific DNA-binding protein), gorA (glutathione reductase), and grxA (glutaredoxin) (50, 51). However, in contrast to the Yap1 regulon, the OxyR regulon excludes both sodA (manganese superoxide dismutase) and zwf (glucose 6 phosphate dehydrogenase), which are part of the Obardot 2-inducible regulon under control of the SoxR/S regulator (52).

The Genes Required for Cadmium Tolerance Are Mostly Confined in the Skn7-independent Subset of the Yap1 Regulon-- GSH represents a first line of defense against cadmium toxicity (53). GSH acts through a cadmium detoxification pathway that involves the yeast cadmium factor Ycf1p, a vacuolar GSH S-conjugate pump of the ABC superfamily of transporters (54-56). Interestingly, YCF1 is also a target of Yap1 (19). In this pathway, cadmium is conjugated to GSH, and the GS-cadmium conjugates are transported to the vacuole by Ycf1p. Glutathione reductase (GLR1) probably acts as a cadmium tolerance factor by recycling oxidized GSH, which accumulates upon cadmium exposure (39) and is known to inhibit Ycf1p (55). The role of GSH1 (39), GLR1, and ZWF1 in the yeast tolerance of cadmium is demonstrated by the increased sensitivity of their respective null mutants to this toxic metal (Spector, unpublished observations). A few activities of the Skn7-dependent gene subset also play a role in cadmium tolerance. These are alkyl hydroperoxide reductase (AHP1) and thioredoxin reductase (TRR1), as shown by the cadmium-hypersensitive phenotype associated with deletion of their gene (32) (Spector, unpublished observations). However, neither peroxiredoxin (TSA1), nor thioredoxin 2 (TRX2) are important in the tolerance of this toxic metal (not shown).

A Co-operative Gene Control Exerted by Yap1 and Skn7-- As shown previously (11), Yap1 and Skn7 exert a dual control on the expression of oxidative stress defense genes. However, the data presented here also show that these two regulators do not always function together. In addition, Skn7 is not only dispensable but has a negative effect upon cadmium tolerance and upon the expression of several Yap1 target genes such as GSH1 and GLR1. This may suggest that Skn7 acts as a repressor for the Skn7-independent Yap1 gene subset. Alternatively, the defective expression of several oxidant scavenging enzymes in skn7Delta -1 could create cellular pro-oxidative conditions resulting in a sustained activation of Yap1. It is also possible that, as recently proposed for OxyR (51), one of the Skn7 target genes participates in a negative autoregulatory loop interrupted in skn7Delta -1, thus leading to a deregulation of Yap1 activity.

Approximately half of the genes of the Yap1 regulon do not contain a YRE. Still, one such gene, TSA1, carries a Yap1- and Skn7-responsive element within a 200-bp proximal region of its promoter and directly binds Yap1 and Skn7. This strongly suggests that TSA1 and very likely most of the other YRE negative genes are directly controlled by Yap1 and Skn7. They also indicate the existence of another Yap1 DNA recognition sequence in addition to the YRE. Efforts are being made to characterize this sequence, as well as the sequence recognized by Skn7.

Conclusions-- The H2O2-inducible Yap1 transcription factor controls a major yeast stress response regulon, which is partitioned into two distinct classes of defense genes by the differential requirement for the Skn7 transcription factor. Such an organization may provide the cell with the ability to use two overlapping sets of genes in distinct stress responses. However, like H2O2, cadmium can induce both gene subsets of the Yap1-controlled regulon (not shown). Conditions under which Yap1 is active and Skn7 is inactive would result in the differential induction of these two gene subsets. The function of Skn7 can be modulated by phosphorylation of the conserved aspartate of the receiver domain (15, 16, 25). However, although important for the contribution of Skn7 to cell cycle control, cell wall metabolism, and modulation of the osmo-stress HOG pathway, this aspartate is dispensable in the oxidative stress response (10, 11). Another post-transcriptional modification might exist that affects the ability of Skn7 to co-operate with Yap1.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Howard Bussey and Steve Moye-Rowley for very generous gifts, Agnes Delaunay for plasmid constructions, and Françoise Bussereau for the computer search of Yap1 and Skn7 recognition sequences. We also thank Nicolas Bouquin for critical reading of the manuscript and stimulating discussions. We particularly thank André Sentenac for strong support and useful suggestions.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by funds from the New Jersey Commission for Cancer Research (to M. B. T.) and the French Ministry of Agriculture (to M. B. T. and J. L.), and by a National Institutes of Health pre-doctoral fellowship (to D. S.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ These authors contributed equally to this work.

** To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 33-1-69088244; Fax: 33-1-69084712; E-mail: toledano{at}jonas.saclay.cea.fr.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: YRE, Yap1 response element; t-BOOH, tert-butyl hydroperoxide; kb, kilobase; HA, hemagglutinin; bp, base pair(s); EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid; mAb, monoclonal antibody; GSH, glutathione.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
  1. Halliwell, B., and Gutteridge, J. M. C. (1989) Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine, Clarendon Press, Oxford
  2. Storz, G., Tartaglia, L. A., Farr, S. B., and Ames, B. N. (1990) Trends Genet. 6, 363-368[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Halliwell, B. (1994) Nutr. Rev. 52, 253-265[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Collinson, L. P., and Dawes, I. W. (1992) J. Gen. Microbiol. 138, 329-335[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Jamieson, D. J. (1992) J. Bacteriol. 174, 6678-6681[Abstract]
  6. Flattery-O'Brien, J., Collinson, L. P., and Dawes, I. W. (1993) J. Gen. Microbiol. 139, 501-507[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Godon, C., Lagniel, G., Lee, J., Buhler, J.-M., Kieffer, S., Perrot, M., Boucherie, H., Toledano, M. B., and Labarre, J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 22480-22489[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Schnell, N., Krems, B., and Entian, K.-D. (1992) Curr. Genet. 21, 269-273[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Kuge, S., and Jones, N. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 655-664[Abstract]
  10. Krems, B., Charizanis, C., and Entian, K.-D. (1996) Curr. Genet. 29, 327-334[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Morgan, B. A., Banks, G. R., Toone, W. M., Raitt, D., Kuge, S., and Johnston, L. H. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 1035-1044[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Moye-Rowley, W. S., Harshma, K. D., and Parker, C. S. (1989) Genes Dev. 3, 283-292[Abstract]
  13. Wu, A., and Moye-Rowley, W. S. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 5832-5839[Abstract]
  14. Fernandes, L., Rodrigues-Pousada, C., and Struhl, K. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 6982-6993[Abstract]
  15. Brown, J. L., Bussey, H., and Stewart, R. C. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 5186-5194[Abstract]
  16. Morgan, B. A., Bouquin, N., Merril, G. F., and Johnston, L. H. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 5679-5689[Abstract]
  17. Krems, B., Charizanis, C., and Entian, K.-D. (1995) Curr. Genet. 27, 427-434[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Grant, C. M., Collinson, L. P., Roe, J. H., and Dawes, I. W. (1996) Mol. Microbiol. 21, 171-179[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Wemmie, J. A., Szczypka, M. S., Thiele, D. J., and Moye-Rowley, W. S. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 32592-32597[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Hirata, D., Yano, K., and Miyakawa, T. (1993) Mol. Gen. Genet. 242, 250-256
  21. Kuge, S., Jones, N., and Nomoto, A. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 1710-1720[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Kuge, S., Toda, T., Lizuka, N., and Nomoto, A. (1998) Genes Cells 3, 521-532[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Wu, A., Wemmie, J. A., Edgington, N. P., Goebl, M., Guevara, J. L., and Moye-Rowley, W. S. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 18850-18858[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Brown, L. L., and Bussey, H. (1993) J. Bacteriol. 175, 6908-6915[Abstract]
  25. Ketela, T., Brown, J. L., Stewart, R. C., and Bussey, H. (1998) Mol. Gen. Genet. 259, 372-378[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Sikorski, R. S., and Hieter, P. (1989) Genetics 122, 19-27[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Rose, M. D., Winston, F., and Hieter, P. (1990) Methods in Yeast Genetics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  28. Guthrie, C., and Fink, G. R. (1991) Methods Enzymol. 194, 182-185[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  30. Schmitt, M. E., Brown, T. A., and Trumpower, B. L. (1990) Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 3091-3092[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Stephen, D. W. S., Rivers, S. L., and Jamieson, D. J. (1995) Mol. Microbiol. 16, 415-423[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Lee, J., Spector, D., Godon, C., Labarre, J., and Toledano, M. B. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 4537-4544[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Babiychuck, E., Kushnir, S., Belles-Boix, E., Van Montagu, M., and Inzé, D. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 26224-26231[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Chae, h. Z., and Rhee, S. G. (1994) Biofactors 4, 177-180[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Chae, H. Z., Chung, S. J., and Rhee, S. G. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 27670-27678[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Netto, L. E. S., Chae, H. Z., Kang, S.-W., Rhee, S. G., and Stadtman, E. R. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 15315-15321[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Kwon, S. J., Park, J.-W., Choi, W.-K., Kim, I. H., and Kim, K. (1994) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 201, 8-15[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Izawa, S., Inoue, Y., and Kimura, A. (1996) Biochem. J. 320, 61-67[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Brennan, R. J., and Schiestl, R. H. (1996) Mutat. Res. 356, 171-178[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. van Loon, A. P. G. M., Pesold-Hurt, B., and Schatz, G. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 3820-3824[Abstract]
  41. Gralla, E. B., and Valentine, J. S. (1991) J. Bacteriol. 173, 5918-5920[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Schaaff-Gerstenschlager, I., and Zimmermann, F. K. (1993) Curr. Genet. 24, 373-376[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Grandori, R., and Carey, J. (1994) Protein Sci. 12, 2185-2193
  44. Nogae, I., and Johnston, M. (1990) Gene (Amst.) 96, 161-169[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Izawa, S., Inoue, Y., and Kimura, A. (1995) FEBS Lett. 368, 73-76[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Grant, C. M., MacIver, F. H., and Dawes, I. W. (1996) Curr. Genet. 29, 511-515[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Juhnke, H., Krems, B., Kotter, P., and Entian, K.-D. (1996) Mol. Gen. Genet. 252, 456-464[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Stephen, D. W. S., and Jamieson, D. J. (1996) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 141, 207-212[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Kullik, I., and Storz, G. (1994) Redox Report 1, 1-7
  50. Toledano, M. B., Kullik, I., Trinh, F., Baird, P., Schneider, T., and Storz, G. (1994) Cell 78, 897-909[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  51. Zheng, M., Aslund, F., and Storz, G. (1998) Science 279, 1718-1721[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Demple, B. (1991) Annu. Rev. Genet. 25, 315-335[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  53. Singhal, R. K., Anderson, M. E., and Meister, A. (1987) FASEB J. 1, 220-223[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Szczypka, M. S., Wemmie, J. A., Moye-Rowley, W. S., and Thiele, D. J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 22853-22857[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Li, Z.-S., Szczypka, M., Lu, Y.-P., Thiele, D. J., and Rea, P. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 6509-6517[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Li, Z. S., Lu, Y. P., Zhen, R. G., Szczypka, M., Thiele, D. J., and Rea, P. A. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 42-47[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.