An Antagonist of cADP-ribose Inhibits Arrhythmogenic Oscillations of Intracellular Ca2+ In Heart Cells*

Stevan Rakovic, Yi Cui, Shigeo Iino, Antony Galione, Gloria A. AshamuDagger , Barry V. L. PotterDagger , and Derek A. Terrar§

From the University Department Of Pharmacology, Oxford University Oxford OX1 3QT, United Kingdom and Dagger  School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Oscillations of Ca2+ in heart cells are a major underlying cause of important cardiac arrhythmias, and it is known that Ca2+-induced release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores (the sarcoplasmic reticulum) is fundamental to the generation of such oscillations. There is now evidence that cADP-ribose may be an endogenous regulator of the Ca2+ release channel of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (the ryanodine receptor), raising the possibility that cADP-ribose may influence arrhythmogenic mechanisms in the heart. 8-Amino-cADP-ribose, an antagonist of cADP-ribose, suppressed oscillatory activity associated with overloading of intracellular Ca2+ stores in cardiac myocytes exposed to high doses of the beta -adrenoreceptor agonist isoproterenol or the Na+/K+-ATPase inhibitor ouabain. The oscillations suppressed by 8-amino-cADP-ribose included intracellular Ca2+ waves, spontaneous action potentials, after-depolarizations, and transient inward currents. Another antagonist of cADP-ribose, 8-bromo-cADP-ribose, was also effective in suppressing isoproterenol-induced oscillatory activity. Furthermore, in the presence of ouabain under conditions in which there was no arrhythmogenesis, exogenous cADP-ribose was found to be capable of triggering spontaneous contractile and electrical activity. Because enzymatic machinery for regulating the cytosolic cADP-ribose concentration is present within the cell, we propose that 8-amino-cADP-ribose and 8-bromo-cADP-ribose suppress cytosolic Ca2+ oscillations by antagonism of endogenous cADP-ribose, which sensitizes the Ca2+ release channels of the sarcoplasmic reticulum to Ca2+.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The release of Ca2+ from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR),1 mediated by Ca2+ release channels known as ryanodine receptors (RyRs), is believed to play an important role not only during normal cardiac muscle contraction but also during abnormal conditions associated with Ca2+ overload and oscillations of cell Ca2+ and membrane potential (1). These oscillations of intracellular Ca2+ are thought to arise from cyclical release and reuptake of Ca2+ by the SR stores and have been suggested to underlie a variety of disturbances of the rhythm of the heart (cardiac arrhythmias).

Ryanodine, which is known to interfere with the function of the SR by an action at RyRs, suppresses oscillations of Ca2+ in cardiac myocytes, demonstrating the important role of the RyR and Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release (CICR) in sustaining spontaneous activity (2). In recent years, cADP-ribose (cADPR) has emerged as a possible endogenous regulator of RyR function by enhancing the sensitivity of CICR to Ca2+ (3-6). Enzymes for the synthesis and breakdown of cADPR are present in cardiac muscle (7-10), and endogenous levels have been estimated to be approximately 200 nM (11). Studies in intact heart cells have yielded results consistent with a role for endogenous cADPR in the regulation of excitation-contraction coupling. In guinea pig cardiac myocytes stimulated to fire action potentials, Ca2+ transients and contractions are enhanced by intracellular applications of cADPR (12) and reduced by antagonists of cADPR, 8-amino-cADPR and 8-bromo-cADPR (12-17). These observations are consistent with endogenous cADPR, acting to enhance the Ca2+ sensitivity of CICR, an action that may be antagonized by 8-amino-cADPR and 8-bromo-cADPR.

In this study we have investigated (in guinea pig ventricular cells) the possible influence of 8-amino-cADPR and 8-bromo-cADPR on spontaneous release of Ca2+ from the SR under conditions of Ca2+ overload. The two maneuvers chosen to induce Ca2+ oscillations involved the use of isoproterenol and ouabain to generate Ca2+ overload. In addition, we have examined whether exogenous application of cADPR may itself be arrhythmogenic under certain conditions.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell Isolation-- Myocytes were isolated enzymatically from guinea pig ventricle as described previously (18, 19) and superfused at 34-36 °C with a solution containing 118.5 mM NaCl, 14.5 mM NaHCO3, 4.2 mM KCl, 1.18 mM KH2PO4, 1.18 mM MgSO4·7H2O, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 11.1 mM glucose (oxygenated at 95% O2, 5% CO2).

Electrophysiology-- In experiments investigating the actions of 8-amino-cADPR, cells were impaled with double-barreled "theta glass" sharp microelectrodes, allowing one barrel (containing 1 M potassium methyl sulfate + 10 mM KCl) to be used for electrical recording and injection of current and the other for cytosolic application of drugs (after obtaining a series of measurements in the absence of drug). Drugs were applied to the cell during the course of an experiment by injecting a small quantity of the appropriate solution into the previously empty barrel of the electrode; this traveled to the tip of the electrode by capillary action and entered the cell by diffusion. In experiments investigating the actions of cADPR, electrical recordings were made from cells using conventional whole-cell (ruptured patch) patch clamp techniques. When drugs were applied to the cytosol, these were included in the pipette solution. Control records were taken in the first min, when it was believed that dialysis from the pipette to the cytosol was minimal, and compared with records 5 to 10 min after rupture of the membrane, when access of the compound to the cytosol was thought to be well established. An Axoclamp 2A recording system was used for switched voltage clamp.

Generation of Oscillatory Activity with Isoproterenol-- Spontaneous contractile and electrical activity was induced by exposure of cells to isoproterenol (20-100 nM, applied continuously). In preliminary experiments, it was found that continuous superfusion with 20 nM isoproterenol provoked spontaneous activity that was stable over a period of at least 8 min. Isoproterenol-induced spontaneous activity was monitored both in cells stimulated to fire action potentials and (in a separate series of experiments) under voltage clamp conditions (with 200-ms step depolarizations from a holding potential of -70 mV to +40 mV at a frequency of 1 Hz). In a further series of experiments, oscillations of intracellular Ca2+ induced by isoproterenol were monitored directly from the fluorescence of fura-2. Cells loaded with fura-2 were found to be less susceptible to the arrhythmogenic actions of isoproterenol, possibly because of the Ca2+-buffering action of the Ca2+ indicator, and hence different conditions were employed from those used to study myocytes not loaded with the Ca2+ dye. Cells were superfused with 120 nM isoproterenol, and the voltage clamp protocol consisted of trains of 20 200-ms step depolarizations from -70 mV to +40 mV at a frequency of 3.3 Hz, with a 5-s interval between trains. With these protocols, no spontaneous activity was recorded in the absence of isoproterenol.

Generation of Oscillatory Activity with Ouabain-- Spontaneous contractile and electrical activity was induced by exposure of cells to ouabain (1 µM, applied for 6-10 min and then washed away). Continuous superfusion with 1 µM ouabain throughout the course of an experiment did not produce stable oscillatory behavior but caused the generation of oscillations, which increased in severity with time, resulting in the gradual deterioration of the cell; however, ouabain-provoked oscillations, once induced, were found to be stable for a period exceeding 8 min after washout of ouabain. For this reason, in experiments investigating the effects of drugs on ouabain-induced oscillations, superfusion with ouabain was discontinued before cytosolic injection of drugs (injection of drugs was carried out within 1 min of washout of ouabain). Ouabain-induced spontaneous activity (in cells not loaded with fura-2) was monitored using a voltage clamp protocol of trains of 5 200-ms step depolarizations (from -70 mV to +40 mV) at a frequency of 2.5 Hz, with a 7-s interval between trains. With these protocols, no spontaneous activity was observed in the absence of ouabain.

Intracellular Free Ca2+ Measurements Using Fura-2-- Fura-2 fluorescence was monitored from cells preincubated with the acetoxymethyl ester of fura-2 (5 µM) for 15-20 min; after loading, a period of at least 30 min was allowed before experimentation for deesterification of the intracellularly accumulated fura-2-AM. Excitation light (wavelength 340 ± 5 or 380 ± 5 nm) from a xenon arc lamp (75 W) was delivered by means of a fiberoptic (diameter 125 µm) with enhanced ultraviolet transmission positioned very close to the cell under study; emitted fluorescence light (500 ± 40 nm) was collected through the microscope objective and quantified by means of a photomultiplier tube.

Imaging of Ca2+ Waves Using Fluo-3-- Fluo-3 fluorescence was monitored from cells preincubated with the acetoxymethyl ester of fluo-3 (5 µM) for 15-20 min; after loading, a period of at least 30 min was allowed before experimentation for deesterification of the intracellularly accumulated fluo-3-AM. Excitation light (wavelength 485 ± 11 nm) from a xenon arc lamp (75 W) was delivered by means of a fiberoptic (diameter 125 µm) with enhanced ultraviolet transmission positioned very close to the cell under study; emitted fluorescence light (530 ± 15 nm) was collected through the microscope objective and captured with a Photonic Science Isis III-intensified CCD camera.

Confocal Microscopy-- Myocytes imaged under the confocal microscope were loaded with fluo-3 as described above. A Leica TCS NT confocal scanning head was coupled to a DMIRB microscope with a 63× water immersion objective lens. Illumination was provided by a 488-nm Ar laser, and a 515-nm long pass filter was used in the collection of emitted fluorescence. Line scan imaging was used to maximize temporal resolution; a single line along the long axis of the heart cell was repeatedly scanned at an acquisition rate of 385 Hz, and images were constructed by displaying successive lines (corresponding to 66 µm in length) adjacent to each other.

Statistics-- Values are expressed as mean ±S.E.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Although low doses of isoproterenol (5 nM) cause an approximate doubling of Ca2+ currents and contractions in guinea pig ventricular cells with no initiation of spontaneous activity,2 high doses (20 nM and higher) provoke spontaneous electrical activity. Fig. 1 illustrates spontaneous electrical activity recorded from a representative cell exposed to 20 nM isoproterenol and stimulated to fire action potentials at a frequency of 1 Hz. In the absence of any drugs (Fig. 1A), only stimulated action potentials were recorded, and no spontaneous electrical activity was observed. However, subsequent exposure to isoproterenol resulted initially (1-2 min) in the appearance of small transient depolarizations between stimulated action potentials (after-depolarizations), which increased in magnitude until sufficiently large to elicit spontaneous action potentials (each associated with a spontaneous contraction). Examples of spontaneous action potentials recorded in this cell after a 3-min superfusion with isoproterenol are shown in Fig. 1B. Fig. 1C shows the effect of cytosolic infusion of 8-amino-cADPR (pipette concentration of 20 µM, dissolved in 20 mM HEPES buffer) in the continued presence of isoproterenol. Within 3 min of 8-amino-cADPR injection, spontaneous electrical activity was completely abolished in this cell, whereas the generation of stimulated action potentials was not affected. Similar experiments were carried out in a total of 8 cells. In 6 of these, isoproterenol-induced spontaneous electrical activity was completely (4 cells) or partially (2 cells) inhibited by 8-amino-cADPR within 5 min. No apparent influence of 8-amino-cADPR was observed in the remaining 2 cells. Overall, the number of spontaneous events recorded over a 5-s period was significantly reduced from 6.4 ± 0.7 to 2.8 ± 1.2 (p < 0.05; n = 8) within 5 min of 8-amino-cADPR infusion.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Effects of 8-amino-cADPR on spontaneous action potentials provoked by isoproterenol. A, intracellular records of membrane potential recorded from a ventricular myocyte isolated from guinea pig heart. Action potentials were evoked by electric current stimuli (2-ms duration) applied at the arrows. B, records in the same cell as for panel A showing spontaneous action potentials provoked by application of (-)-isoproterenol (20 nM). Note the lack of correlation, with arrows marking current stimuli. C, suppression of the spontaneous activity (with action potentials occurring only at the time of the current stimuli applied at the arrows) by 8-amino-cADPR (20 µM) dissolved in HEPES buffer (20 mM) and applied to the cytosol through one barrel of a microelectrode made using theta glass tubing. D, action potentials recorded in another cell under the same conditions as for panel A. E, spontaneous activity recorded in the same cell shown in panel D following application of isoproterenol (i.e. same conditions as for panel B). F, activity in the same cell as for panels D and E recorded 5 min after cytosolic application of HEPES buffer without 8-amino-cADPR. Note that spontaneous activity persisted under these conditions.

In the cells in which 8-amino-cADPR suppressed spontaneous activity, these actions appeared to develop progressively with time; spontaneous action potentials were superceded by after-depolarizations, and after-depolarizations appeared to gradually decrease in magnitude and occur with progressively increasing delay after the preceding stimulated action potential. Such a progressive suppression of oscillatory activity may reflect a gradual increase of 8-amino-cADPR concentration within the cell.

As a control for the above series of experiments, the effects of injection of HEPES buffer (20 mM) in the absence of 8-amino-cADPR were investigated. In 6 of 9 cells studied, little or no effect of HEPES was observed on isoproterenol-induced spontaneous electrical activity (data from a representative cell are shown in Fig. 1, D, E, and F). In 2 cells, a slight increase in the frequency of occurrence of spontaneous activity was observed, whereas in 1 cell, a small decrease was noted. Overall, HEPES was without significant effect; the number of spontaneous events recorded before and 5 min after injection of HEPES was 6.4 ± 0.6 and 6.9 ± 0.7, respectively (p > 0.05; n = 9).

In a further series of experiments, the effects of 8-amino-cADPR and HEPES on isoproterenol-induced oscillations were investigated under voltage clamp conditions to avoid any effects that might arise from changes in action potential duration. Cells were stimulated at a frequency of 1 Hz with 200-ms step depolarizations from a holding potential of -70 mV to +40 mV. In all cells studied, superfusion with 20-100 nM isoproterenol for 3 min resulted in the appearance of transient inward currents between depolarizing pulses; a representative example is presented in Fig. 2. These transient inward currents are likely to be secondary to spontaneous Ca2+ release from an overloaded SR and are thought to be carried predominantly by sarcolemmal Na+/Ca2+ exchange operating in the Ca2+ extrusion mode (20, 21). In this cell, subsequent infusion of 20 µM 8-amino-cADPR (in the continued presence of isoproterenol) was associated with complete suppression of transient inward currents within 5 min (Fig. 2B). In a total of 9 cells investigated, 5 showed complete suppression of transient inward currents within 5 min of 8-amino-cADPR infusion; in 2 cells, the magnitudes of transient inward currents were reduced, whereas in a further 2 cells, there was little or no change. Overall, 8-amino-cADPR (5 min) suppressed the frequency of occurrence of transient inward currents from 0.84 ± 0.08/step depolarization to 0.33 ± 0.07 (p < 0.05; n = 9) and reduced the magnitude of the first transient inward current to 42 ± 7%, that of the preinjection value (p < 0.05; n = 9).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Effects of 8-amino-cADPR on transient inward currents provoked by isoproterenol. A, records of spontaneous activity (initiated by isoproterenol) recorded under voltage clamp conditions (switched voltage clamp). The lower trace in this and later panels represents the membrane potential, clamp steps to +40 mV for 200 ms from a holding potential of -70 mV, frequency 1 Hz. Exposure of the cells to isoproterenol (20 nM) provoked spontaneous transient inward currents (upper trace) which can be seen as fluctuations in the current level between pulses (arrows). B, these spontaneous transient inward current fluctuations were suppressed by 8-amino-cADPR (records in same cell as for panel A, recorded 5 min after the addition of 20 µM 8-amino-cADPR to the application barrel of the microelectrode). C, spontaneous activity (arrows) in another cell under the same conditions as for panel A. D, failure of cytosolic application of 20 mM HEPES buffer to suppress spontaneous transient inward currents (traces in the same cell as for panel C were recorded 5 min after the addition of HEPES to the application barrel of the microelectrode).

In contrast, infusion of HEPES did not reduce the frequency of occurrence and magnitudes of isoproterenol-induced transient inward currents in 5 cells studied. Results from a representative cell are presented in Fig. 2, C and D.

To monitor more directly isoproterenol-induced Ca2+ oscillations, experiments similar to those described above were repeated in cells loaded with the fluorescent Ca2+ indicator fura-2, using a photomultiplier tube to collect emitted fluorescence. It was found that cells loaded with fura-2 were not as susceptible to exhibit spontaneous oscillations in cytosolic Ca2+, possibly because of the buffering action of the Ca2+ indicator, and hence more vigorous conditions were required to generate oscillatory changes in Ca2+ (see the Fig. 3 legend). In 5 of 7 cells studied, complete cessation of isoproterenol-provoked Ca2+ oscillations occurred within 6 min of 8-amino-cADPR injection (20 µM) despite continuous superfusion with isoproterenol. Data from a typical cell are presented in Fig. 3. In the absence of isoproterenol, the fluorescence signal was stable between trains of voltage clamp pulses; in the presence of isoproterenol, transient deflections in the fluorescence signal were recorded between trains of voltage clamp pulses, representing spontaneous elevations of intracellular Ca2+ (Fig. 3A). These oscillations of cytosolic Ca2+ were abolished within 6 min of 8-amino-cADPR infusion (Fig. 3B). In the remaining 2 cells, 8-amino-cADPR infusion was associated with prolongation of the time to onset of the spontaneous event, with little change in the magnitude. In these 7 cells, injection of 8-amino-cADPR was associated with significant (p < 0.05) reductions both in the number of spontaneous oscillations per train of voltage clamp pulses (from 1.14 ± 0.14 to 0.29 ± 0.18) and in the peak magnitude of the first oscillation following a train of pulses, as determined from the fura-2 fluorescence signal (to 27 ± 18% that before 8-amino-cADPR injection). In six control experiments, HEPES was not effective in suppressing isoproterenol-induced oscillations under these conditions (data from a representative cell are shown in Fig. 3, C and D).


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Effects of 8-amino-cADPR on isoproterenol-provoked Ca2+ oscillations, monitored from the fluorescence of fura-2. A, records of fura-2 fluorescence in a single ventricular cell. Excitation was delivered at 380 ± 5 nm, and emitted fluorescence was measured at 500 ± 40 nm by means of a photomultiplier tube; downward deflections represent increases in cytosolic Ca2+. The bar represents application of a train of voltage clamp pulses from -70 to +40 mV, pulse duration 200 ms, frequency 3.3 Hz, which provoked increases in cytosolic Ca2+ with each pulse (downward deflections are coincident with the bar). Spontaneous Ca2+ release provoked by exposure to isoproterenol is shown by the downward deflection (arrow) without stimuli after the bar. B, spontaneous activity was suppressed by cytosolic application of 8-amino-cADPR (same cell as for panel A recorded 5 min after the addition of 20 µM 8-amino-cADPR to the application barrel of the microelectrode). C, fura-2 signals showing cytosolic Ca2+ recorded in another cell under the same conditions as for panel A (spontaneous activity shown by the arrow). D, failure of cytosolic application of HEPES buffer alone to suppress spontaneous activity (arrow) in the same cell as for panel C (recorded 5 min after the addition to the application barrel of the microelectrode). In these experiments, myocytes were superfused with a higher concentration of isoproterenol (120 nM), and trains of high frequency voltage clamp pulses were employed to enhance the loading of the SR with Ca2+ (trains of 20 200-ms step depolarizations from -70 mV to +40 mV at a frequency of 3.3 Hz, with a 5-s interval between trains).

In another series of experiments, isoproterenol-provoked spontaneous Ca2+ waves propagating across the cell were recorded using an image-intensified CCD camera. An example of a spontaneous Ca2+ wave, initiated after superfusion with isoprenaline, is shown in Fig. 4A; two waves begin near the center of the cell and propagate toward the edges in opposite directions. In this cell, cytosolic application of 8-amino-cADPR was associated with complete abolition of Ca2+ waves within 5 min (Fig. 4B). In 12 of 17 cells studied in this way, Ca2+ waves were abolished or markedly suppressed by 8-amino-cADPR (20 µM) within 8 min.


View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Effects of 8-amino-cADPR on isoproterenol-provoked Ca2+ waves, recorded using an image-intensified CCD camera. A, records of fluo-3 fluorescence in a single ventricular cell, captured using an image-intensified CCD camera. Excitation was delivered at 485 ± 11 nm, and emitted fluorescence was collected at 530 ± 15 nm; dark colors represent low concentrations of cytosolic Ca2+, and light colors represent high concentrations. Images were captured every 20 ms. Calcium waves (red) are initiated near the center of the cell and propagate in opposite directions toward the edges. B, calcium waves were completely suppressed by the cytosolic application of 8-amino-cADPR (same cell as for panel A recorded 5 min after the addition of 20 µM 8-amino-cADPR to the application barrel of the microlectrode).

The spatial characteristics of spontaneous activity and its suppression by 8-amino-cADPR were studied in more detail using a laser-scanning confocal microscope operating in line-scan mode (cells loaded with the Ca2+ indicator fluo-3). In this configuration, the temporal resolution was maximized by repeatedly scanning at a rate of 2.6 ms/scan along a single line (66 µm in length) across the long axis of the heart cell. The lower panel of Fig. 5A illustrates the images obtained by this method. Each image (numbered 1-12) is composed of 512 sequential line scans with each line displayed in a vertical orientation. Thus, the horizontal direction in the image represents increasing time (2.6 ms/line, 1331 ms for each image), and the vertical direction represents the distance along the line scan (66 µm for each image).


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Effects of 8-amino-cADPR on isoproterenol-provoked Ca2+ waves, imaged using a confocal microscope. A, the upper panel shows intracellular records of membrane potential recorded from a single ventricular myocyte superfused for 3 min with isoproterenol (50 nM). A series of 10 action potentials was evoked by electric current stimuli (2 ms duration) applied at the blue lines, and this was subsequently followed by a single after-depolarization (arrow). The lower panel displays line scan images obtained at the corresponding times. Each image is composed of 512 scanned lines (66 µm in length, scan rate 385 Hz) presented in a vertical orientation. Hence, each image has a vertical dimension of 66 µm and a horizontal dimension of 1331 ms. Each stimulated action potential is accompanied by a rapid rise in intracellular Ca2+ (red), which occurred uniformly along the scanned line (images 1-6). Image 8 illustrates a Ca2+ wave that was associated with the after-depolarization; the wave was initiated near the lower end of the image and subsequently propagated along the scanned line (and hence cell). B, data from the same cell, recorded 3 min after infusion of 8-amino-cADPR (20 µM) in the continued presence of isoproterenol. No spontaneous activity was present, as illustrated by the lack of after-depolarizations and Ca2+ waves.

In this series of experiments, myocytes were repeatedly stimulated to fire trains of 10 action potentials (at 1 Hz) with a 10-s interval between trains and were provoked to exhibit spontaneous Ca2+ waves by superfusion with 50 nM isoproterenol. The upper panel of Fig. 5A shows data from a representative cell and illustrates 10 stimulated action potentials (stimuli applied at blue line) followed by an after-depolarization (arrow) that developed following superfusion with isoproterenol. The lower panel presents the line scan images obtained over this period; dark colors represent low cytosolic Ca2+, whereas red represents high Ca2+. Images 1-6 illustrate elevations in intracellular Ca2+ accompanying each action potential, and it can be seen that the rise in Ca2+ is relatively uniform along the line scan, representing a synchronous global increase in Ca2+. In contrast, image 8 shows a spontaneous Ca2+ wave associated with the after-depolarization; it can be seen that the rise in Ca2+ is not uniform along the line but commences at a point near the lower end of the image before propagating along the length of the cell as time proceeds. Fig. 5B shows data from the same cell 5 min after injection of 20 µM 8-amino-cADPR. 8-Amino-cADPR completely suppressed the generation of Ca2+ waves and after-depolarizations in this cell without abolishing stimulated action potentials or the calcium transients that accompany them. There was also an apparent reduction in the magnitude of the calcium elevations accompanying each action potential; this might be expected, as 8-amino-cADPR has previously been shown to reduce the magnitude of the calcium transient in guinea pig ventricular myocytes (13). However, a contribution of dye loss to the reduction in fluorescence intensity is likely also to contribute.

Data from another cell are shown in Fig. 6. In this cell, isoproterenol-provoked oscillations were more severe, consisting of spontaneous action potentials (Fig. 6A, upper panel). The line scan images (lower panel) reveal that each spontaneous action potential was preceded by a calcium wave that commenced at a point near the center of the scanned line before propagating bidirectionally toward the edges of the cell. Subsequently a global increase in Ca2+ occurred along the line as the spontaneous action potential was initiated. Image 3 of Fig. 6A has been enlarged for clarity: the white arrow indicates a Ca2+ wave preceding a spontaneous action potential. It is interesting to note that the global rise in Ca2+ accompanying the spontaneous action potential was not uniform along the scanned line; instead, the region of the cell to which the wave had previously propagated showed a smaller increase in Ca2+ than adjacent areas. This may be because of selective depletion of intracellular Ca2+ stores in this region of the cell or inactivation of the RyRs involved in the propagation of the wave. After injection of 8-amino-cADPR, the generation of spontaneous action potentials was completely suppressed, as shown in Fig. 6B, although some oscillatory activity persisted in the form of a single after-depolarization (arrow) accompanied by a Ca2+ wave (image 3, enlarged for clarity). In total, 8 cells were imaged in this way; in 6 of these, 20 µM 8-amino-cADPR completely or partially suppressed isoproterenol-induced calcium waves within 8 min of injection.


View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Effects of 8-amino-cADPR on isoproterenol-provoked Ca2+ waves, imaged using a confocal microscope. A, membrane potential records (upper panel) and line scan images (lower panel) obtained from a single ventricular myocyte superfused for 3 min with isoproterenol (50 nM). Current stimuli were applied at the blue lines. In this cell, isoproterenol provoked the generation of spontaneous action potentials, each of which was associated with elevations of cytosolic Ca2+. Preceding the upstroke of each spontaneous action potential was a Ca2+ wave; image 3 has been enlarged to illustrate the nature of this wave more clearly. The wave (white arrow in enlarged image) was initiated at a locus near the center of the scanned line and subsequently spread in opposite directions along the scanned line toward both edges of the cell. The wave was terminated by a global increase in Ca2+ that was associated with the upstroke of the spontaneous action potential. B, data from the same cell, recorded 5 min after infusion of 8-amino-cADPR (20 µM) in the continued presence of isoproterenol. Spontaneous action potential generation had been abolished, although some spontaneous activity persisted in the form of a single after-depolarization (arrow, upper panel) accompanied by a Ca2+ wave (image 3, also presented in enlarged form).

The actions of 8-amino-cADPR were also investigated using another method to provoke Ca2+ oscillations. In this series of experiments, spontaneous activity was initiated by exposure to the cardiac glycoside ouabain rather than isoproterenol. Ouabain has been employed in a number of studies as an experimental tool for the generation of spontaneous Ca2+ oscillations in heart cells (22, 23). Its major mechanism of action is believed to involve binding to the K+ binding site of the sarcolemmal Na+/K+-ATPase and inhibition of its activity, resulting in a secondary rise in the level of intracellular Na+ (24-27). This in turn is thought to inhibit the extrusion of Ca2+ via sarcolemmal Na+/Ca2+ exchange, leading to an elevation of cytosolic Ca2+ and a secondary increase in the quantity of Ca2+ stored in the SR. The spontaneous oscillations of intracellular Ca2+ associated with ouabain toxicity are believed to be because of overloading of the SR with Ca2+; indeed, elevated levels of "luminal" Ca2+ have been reported to enhance the open probability of RyRs studied in planar lipid bilayers (28). Additional mechanisms may also be involved; certain glycosides have been reported to increase Ca2+ entry via sarcolemmal Ca2+ channels (29) and increase the open probability of single RyRs incorporated into artificial lipid bilayers (30). Furthermore, it has recently been reported that ouabain may alter the ion selectivity of sarcolemmal Na+ channels to allow Ca2+ entry ("slip mode conductance"), which might contribute to increased cellular Ca2+ loading (31).

Cytosolic injection of 8-amino-cADPR, but not HEPES, was associated with a suppression of ouabain-induced transient inward currents; representative individual experiments are shown in Fig. 7. In 7 cells studied, intracellular application of 8-amino-cADPR (20 µM) resulted in reductions both in the number of transient inward currents per train of voltage clamp pulses (from 1.85 ± 0.48 to 1.00 ± 0.10; p < 0.05) and in the magnitude of the first transient inward current following a series of pulses (to 50 ± 6% that before injection; p < 0.05). In contrast, injection of HEPES (20 mM) was without significant effect on either of these variables.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Effects of 8-amino-cADPR on transient inward currents provoked by ouabain. A, the upper trace shows spontaneous transient inward currents (arrows) recorded under voltage clamp conditions from a cell exposed to ouabain (1 µM in the bath solution) for 6 min. No such currents were recorded in the absence of ouabain. The lower trace shows a train of 5 voltage clamp pulses (from -70 to +40 mV, duration 200 ms, frequency 2.5 Hz) applied to this cell to maintain adequate loading of intracellular Ca2+ stores. B, these transient inward current fluctuations were suppressed by 8-amino-cADPR (same cell as for panel A recorded 5 min after addition of 20 µM 8-amino-cADPR to the application barrel of the microelectrode). C, spontaneous transient inward current fluctuations recorded from another cell under the same conditions as for panel A. D, failure of HEPES alone to suppress transient inward current oscillations provoked by ouabain (same cell as for panel C recorded 5 min after the addition of 20 mM HEPES buffer to the application barrel of the microelectrode).

8-Bromo-cADPR is another cADPR analogue that has been shown to act as an antagonist of cADPR, albeit with less potency than 8-amino-cADPR (12, 14). We therefore investigated the actions of this compound in experiments similar to those presented in Fig. 1; cells were stimulated to fire action potentials at 1 Hz, and spontaneous activity was induced by 50 nM isoprenaline. In 6 of 8 cells studied, injection of 100 µM 8-bromo-cADPR was associated with suppression or abolition of spontaneous activity (after-depolarizations and spontaneous action potentials), supporting the hypothesis that this is being achieved through an antagonism of the actions of endogenous cADPR.

Because 8-amino-cADPR and 8-bromo-cADPR, antagonists of cADPR, were found in the above experiments to be effective in suppressing Ca2+ oscillations under conditions of Ca2+ overload, it was of interest to determine whether, under certain conditions, exogenous cADPR might trigger oscillatory behavior in previously quiescent cells. In support of this possibility were previous observations that application of 10 µM cADPR via a patch pipette was found to be associated with the development of spontaneous activity in a minority of cells (4 of 15). To investigate further whether exogenous cADPR might provoke oscillations, ventricular myocytes were superfused (for 6-7 min) with 1 µM ouabain and stimulated to fire action potentials at 1 Hz, conditions that alone do not lead to arrhythmogenesis but which might be expected to increase the tendency for this to occur (through enhancement of SR Ca2+ loading). Under such conditions, 7 of 9 cells showed spontaneous contractile and electrical activity within 10 min of exposure to cADPR (50 µM); a typical example is shown in Fig. 8. In contrast, omission of cADPR from the patch pipette in 10 cells superfused with 1 µM ouabain was not associated with the generation of any oscillatory behavior.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Development of spontaneous action potentials (in a cell exposed to ouabain) following application of cADPR via a patch pipette. A, intracellular records of membrane potential recorded from a ventricular myocyte isolated from guinea pig heart and superfused with 1 µM ouabain for 6 min. Action potentials were evoked by electric current stimuli (2 ms duration) applied at the arrows. B, records in the same cell as for panel A showing after-depolarizations (transient depolarizations in the membrane potential occurring between stimulated action potentials) following a 6-min exposure to cADPR (50 µM in the patch pipette). C, records in the same cell as for panel A showing spontaneous action potentials (note lack of correlation with arrows), which developed following a 12-min exposure to cADPR.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The above data demonstrate a suppressive effect of 8-amino-cADPR and 8-bromo-cADPR on spontaneous Ca2+ waves, contractions, and electrical activity recorded in guinea pig ventricular myocytes under conditions of Ca2+ overload induced by isoproterenol or (in the case of 8-amino-cADPR) ouabain. We have reported previously that, in guinea pig ventricular myocytes stimulated to fire action potentials at 1 Hz, injection of 8-amino-cADPR reduces the Ca2+ transient and accompanying contraction by a mechanism involving a decrease in the quantity of Ca2+ released from the SR but with no reduction in the amount of stored Ca2+ (13). Similarly, application of 8-bromo-cADPR via a patch pipette has also been shown to suppress the Ca2+ transient and twitch contraction of guinea pig ventricular cells (12). The observations presented here are thus consistent with an action of 8-amino-cADPR and 8-bromo-cADPR to inhibit oscillatory activity induced by isoproterenol or ouabain through the suppression of Ca2+ release from the SR, most likely because of effects (either direct or indirect) on the RyR.

In view of the evidence in sea urchin egg preparations and mammalian cells that 8-amino-cADPR and 8-bromo-cADPR are competitive antagonists of cADPR-induced Ca2+ mobilization (14, 17, 32), we propose that suppression of oscillatory activity by these compounds may be because of antagonism of the actions of endogenous cADPR. ADP-ribosyl cyclase activity has been identified in rat cardiac myocytes (7), and intracellular levels of cADPR have been estimated to be of the order of 200 nM (11). Furthermore, cADPR has been reported to enhance CICR in a number of preparations, including guinea pig heart cells (12), sea urchin eggs (33, 34), and neuronal cells (5, 35-37). This would support the hypothesis that suppression of Ca2+ oscillations (provoked by isoproterenol and ouabain) by 8-amino-cADPR and 8-bromo-cADPR is because of antagonism of the actions of endogenous cADPR, which sensitizes the CICR mechanism to Ca2+.

In support of the theory that cADPR amplifies CICR in the heart is the observation above that, if loading of the SR with Ca2+ was augmented by exposure to 1 µM ouabain (under conditions in which this concentration was insufficient to initiate oscillatory behavior alone), exogenous cADPR was associated with the development of spontaneous contractile and electrical activity. It therefore seems possible that cADPR may exert an important influence on arrhythmogenic activity in the heart, particularly under conditions where loading of the SR with Ca2+ is high, and hence, compounds that reduce the actions of endogenous cADPR may prove useful in the treatment of certain cardiac arrhythmias.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by grants from the Wellcome Trust and SmithKline Beecham. Tel.: 44-1865-271613; Fax: 44-1865-271853; E-mail: derek.terrar{at}pharm.ox.ac.uk.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: University Dept. of Pharmacology, Oxford University, Mansfield Rd., Oxford, OX1 3QT UK. Tel.: 44-1865-271613; Fax: 44-1865-271853; E-mail: derek.terrar{at}pharm.ox.ac.uk.

2 S. Rakovic, Y. Cui, S. Iino, A. Galione, G. A. Ashamu, B. V. L. Potter, and D. A. Terrar, unpublished data.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: SR, sarcoplasmic reticulum, RyR, ryanodine receptors; CICR, Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release; cADPR, cADP-ribose.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
  1. Bers, D. M. (1991) Excitation-Contraction Coupling and Cardiac Contractile Force, pp. 119-148, 171-204, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
  2. Eisner, D. A., and Valdeolmillos, M. (1986) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 372, 539-556[Abstract]
  3. Galione, A., Lee, H. C., and Busa, W. B. (1991) Science 253, 1143-1146[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Lee, H. C., Aarhus, R., and Walseth, T. F. (1993) Science 261, 352-355[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Hua, S. Y., Tokinasa, T., Takasawa, S., Furuya, Y., Nohmi, M., Okamoto, H., and Kuba, K. (1994) Neuron 12, 1073-1079[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Galione, A., and Summerhill, R. S. (1996) in Ryanodine Receptors (Sorrentino, V., ed), pp. 52-70, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL
  7. Rusinko, N., and Lee, H. C. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 11725-11731[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Meszaros, V., Socci, R., and Meszaros, L. G. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 210, 452-456[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Meszaros, L. G., Wrenn, R. W., and Varadi, G. (1997) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 234, 252-256[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Chidambaram, N., Wong, E. T., and Chang, C. F. (1998) Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int. 44, 1225-1233[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Walseth, T. F., Aarhus, R., Zeleznikar, R., Jr., and Lee, H. C. (1991) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1094, 113-120[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Iino, S., Cui, Y., Galione, A., and Terrar, D. A. (1997) Circ. Res. 81, 879-884[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Rakovic, S., Galione, A., Ashamu, G. A., Potter, B. V. L., and Terrar, D. A. (1996) Curr. Biol. 6, 989-996[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Walseth, T. F., and Lee, H. C. (1993) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1178, 235-242[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Clementi, E., Riccio, M., Sciorati, C., Nistico, G., and Meldolesi, J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 17739-17745[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Linden, D. J., Dawson, T. M., and Dawson, V. L. (1995) J. Neurosci. 15, 5098-5105[Abstract]
  17. Guse, A. H., da Silva, C. P., Emmrich, F., Ashamu, G. A., Potter, B. V. L., and Mayr, G. W. (1995) J. Immunol. 155, 3353-3359[Abstract]
  18. Powell, T., Terrar, D. A., and Twist, V. W. (1980) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 302, 131-153[Abstract]
  19. Mitchell, M. R., Powell, T., Terrar, D. A., and Twist, V. W. (1984) Br. J. Pharmacol. 81, 543-550[Abstract]
  20. Fedida, D., Noble, D., Rankin, A. C., and Spindler, A. J. (1987) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 392, 523-542[Abstract]
  21. Kimura, J. (1988) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 407, 79P
  22. Wier, W. G., and Hess, P. (1984) J. Gen. Physiol. 83, 395-415[Abstract]
  23. Aronson, R. S., and Nordin, C. (1988) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 400, 113-134[Abstract]
  24. Eisner, D. A., Lederer, W. J., and Vaughan-Jones, R. D. (1984) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 355, 251-266[Abstract]
  25. Harrison, S. M., McCall, E., and Boyett, M. R. (1990) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 449, 517-550[Abstract]
  26. Fozzard, H. A., and Sheets, M. F. (1985) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 5, 10A-15A[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Levi, A. J., Boyett, M. R., and Lee, C. O. (1994) Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 62, 1-54[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Sitsapesan, R., and Williams, A. J. (1994) J. Membr. Biol. 137, 215-226[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Marban, E., and Tsien, R. W. (1982) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 329, 589-614[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. McGarry, S. J., and Williams, A. J. (1993) Br. J. Pharmacol. 108, 1043-1050[Abstract]
  31. Santana, L. F., Gomez, A. M., and Lederer, W. J. (1998) Science 279, 1027-1033[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Kuemmerle, J. F., and Makhlouf, G. M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 25488-25494[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Lee, H. C. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 293-299[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Guo, X., and Becker, P. L. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 16984-16989[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Currie, K. P., Swann, K., Galione, A., and Scott, R. H. (1992) Mol. Biol. Cell 3, 1415-1425[Abstract]
  36. Verkhratsky, A., and Shmigol, A. (1996) Cell Calcium 19, 1-14[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Empson, R. M., and Galione, A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 20967-20970[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.