Action of Phosphatidylinositol-specific Phospholipase Cgamma 1 on Soluble and Micellar Substrates
SEPARATING EFFECTS ON CATALYSIS FROM MODULATION OF THE SURFACE*

Chun ZhouDagger , Debra Horstman§, Graham Carpenter§, and Mary F. RobertsDagger

From the Dagger  Merkert Chemistry Center, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02467 and the § Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville Tennessee 37232

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
References

The kinetics of PI-PLCgamma 1 toward a water-soluble substrate (inositol 1,2-cyclic phosphate, cIP) and phosphatidylinositol (PI) in detergent mixed micelles were monitored by 31P NMR spectroscopy. That cIP is also a substrate (Km = ~15 mM) implies a two-step mechanism (intramolecular phosphotransferase reaction to form cIP followed by cyclic phosphodiesterase activity to form inositol-1-phosphate (I-1-P)). PI is cleaved by PI-PLCgamma 1 to form cIP and I-1-P with the enzyme specific activity and ratio of products (cIP/I-1-P) regulated by assay temperature, pH, Ca2+, and other amphiphilic additives. Cleavage of both cIP and PI by the enzyme is optimal at pH 5. The effect of Ca2+ on PI-PLCgamma 1 activity is unique compared with other isozymes enzymes: Ca2+ is necessary for the activity and low Ca2+ activates the enzyme; however, high Ca2+ inhibits PI-PLCgamma 1 hydrolysis of phosphoinositides (but not cIP) with the extent of inhibition dependent on pH, substrate identity (cIP or PI), substrate presentation (e.g. detergent matrix), and substrate surface concentration. This inhibition of PI-PLCgamma 1 by high Ca2+ is proposed to derive from the divalent metal ion-inducing clustering of the PI and reducing its accessibility to the enzyme. Amphiphilic additives such as phosphatidic acid, fatty acid, and sodium dodecylsulfate enhance PI cleavage in micelles at pH 7.5 but not at pH 5.0; they have no effect on cIP hydrolysis at either pH value. These different kinetic patterns are used to propose a model for regulation of the enzyme. A key hypothesis is that there is a pH-dependent conformational change in the enzyme that controls accessibility of the active site to both water-soluble cIP and interfacially organized PI. The low activity enzyme at pH 7.5 can be activated by PA (or phosphorylation by tyrosine kinase). However, this activation requires lipophilic substrate (PI) present because cIP hydrolysis is not enhanced in the presence of PA.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
References

Mammalian phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC)1 enzymes are key components of PI-mediated signaling cascades in vivo (1, 2). These enzymes are subdivided into three main classes, PI-PLC-beta , -gamma , and -delta , that share three conserved regions (3): (i) an N-terminal pleckstrin homology (PH) domain (these domains often have a high affinity for the phosphoinositide PIP2), (ii) the X domain (~170 amino acids), and (iii) the Y domain (~260 amino acids). A C2 or Ca2+-lipid binding domain is also present at the C-terminal end of PI-PLC-gamma and -delta . In all cases, the X and Y domains are necessary for catalysis (4) with the other domains involved in regulating activity. For example, in the case of PI-PLC-delta , the PH domain plays an allosteric role in binding the protein to a bilayer (5). PH domains also bind beta gamma G proteins very tightly (6), and PI-PLC-beta activity is regulated by interactions with Gq proteins (7, 8).

PI-PLCgamma isozymes are the largest of PI-PLC isozymes and are abundant in many tissues and cell types. The biological significance of the PI-PLCgamma 1 enzyme has been documented (2). When PI-PLCgamma 1 was "knocked out" of mice by targeted gene disruption (9), the embryos failed to develop beyond 9 days. The lethality was not due to a specific organ failure but to a general lack of growth in all parts of the embryo. Thus, in an intact mammal PI-PLCgamma 1 is indispensable for cell proliferation, and the requirement is not compensated for by other signal transduction pathways or other PI-PLC isozymes. The enzymes are activated by tyrosine kinase growth factor receptors (10, 11). The phosphorylation enhances translocation of protein from cytosol to plasma membrane (10). A unique feature of PI-PLCgamma isozymes that distinguishes them from the beta  and delta  classes is that the extended sequence between the X and Y domains is homologous to Src domains. These SH2 and SH3 domains can interact with protein tyrosine kinases and activate the enzyme (10-13). Flanking these Src homology domains is a split PH domain as well. Deletion of SH2 and SH3 domains produces an enzyme that still has catalytic activity but altered regulation (14). Expression of the X and Y domains in tandem leads to a folded structure that has a 20-fold higher activity toward PI and now has optimum activity at pH 7 (15).

Given the structural complexity of this protein, kinetic studies with well defined substrates can shed light on the roles and importance of the different domains for the actual catalytic cleavage of PI. Although purified PI-PLCgamma 1 exhibits a moderate preference for PIP2 as substrate (3), it can hydrolyze PI efficiently yielding both cIP and I-1-P as products. In the present work we have focused on characterizing the activity of PI-PLCgamma 1 toward the water-soluble substrate cIP as well as on PI/detergent mixed micelles. As was observed for PI-PLCdelta 1 (16), cIP is a substrate for PI-PLCgamma 1, and examining how nonsubstrate amphiphiles affect kinetic parameters is useful in assessing how interfacial modulation of the protein affects this catalytic step. Although PI-PLCgamma 1 kinetics show some similarity with PI-PLCdelta 1, there are critical differences. In particular, the observation of higher specific activity at pH 5 toward both water-soluble cIP and PI, inhibition of PI cleavage by Ca2+ concentrations in excess of a critical threshold, the lack of surface or organic solvent activation of the enzyme toward cIP, PA activation toward PI (but not cIP) at pH >6, and changes in the ratio of product cIP to I-1-P by temperature, pH, Ca2+, or other additives provide insights into how this enzyme could be regulated in vivo.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemicals-- DiC7PC, POPC, POPA, LPA, POPS, PMPMe, and PI were obtained from Avanti and used without further purification. Triton X-100, SDS, oleic acid, GPI, GPIP, GPIP2, PIP, and crude soybean PI were purchased from Sigma. Crude soybean PI (50% PI) was used for the enzymatic generation (using bacterial PI-PLC) of cIP as described previously (17).

Enzymes-- A rat cDNA encoding PI-PLCgamma 1 was expressed as a histidine-tagged fusion protein that was purified by Ni2+ agarose affinity chromatography to homogeneity (18).

Preparation of Assay Solution-- The buffers used were 50 mM sodium acetate/acetic acid (pH 5.0), 50 mM sodium citric/citric acid (pH 6.0), or 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.0, 7.5, or 8.0). A stock solution of cIP (200 mM) was prepared by dissolving cIP in D2O and adjusting the pH to 6.0. In the cIP assays, 8 mM diC7PC, 8 mM TX-100, and 24% organic solvent (Me2SO, dimethylformamide, and isopropanol) were added to examine the interfacial activation and organic solvent effect at different pH values. Mixed micelles of PI solubilized in TX-100 or diC7PC were also used as substrates for PI-PLCgamma 1. The ratio of PI to TX-100 or diC7PC was varied as indicated. The addition of PA, oleic acid, SDS, and PMPMe to TX-100/PI mixed micelles was also examined. The optimum Ca2+ concentration for cIP or PI hydrolysis appears to be much higher than with phosphorylated water-soluble and amphiphilic substrates; hence it is not necessary to buffer Ca2+ in the assay solution. EGTA is not a good chelator for Ca2+ at pH 5.0 and does not act as a buffer for free Ca2+ in our assay solutions. Instead, the free Ca2+ concentration was measured using the probe Fluo-3 (19). The background of Ca2+ in the assay solution was around 10-20 µM. Additional Ca2+, ranging from 0.1 to 6 mM, was added to the assay solution. The total volume of each assay was fixed to 350 µl.

31P NMR Assay of PI-PLCgamma 1 Activity-- 31P spectra were acquired at 202.7 Hz on a Varian Unity 500 spectrometer using a 5-mm broadband probe. 31P NMR parameters were based on those used previously (17). 31P chemical shifts were referenced to phosphoric acid (5%) as an external standard. For all kinetic runs, a control spectrum (t = 0 min) was acquired prior to the addition of enzyme. The amount of enzyme added to initiate hydrolysis depended on the substrate, pH, and other assay conditions. The reaction rate was calculated from intensity changes of PI, cIP, or I-1-P. The experimental error with this assay technique is ±10%.

    RESULTS

Water-soluble cIP Is a Substrate of PI-PLCgamma 1-- Bacterial PI-PLC catalyzes the two discrete steps of PI cleavage sequentially with accumulation of cIP occurring before conversion to I-1-P. This is the result of facile product release and a high Km (~90 mM without interfaces, as low as 25 mM with interfaces present) and low Vmax (20 µmol min-1 mg-1) for cIP, the substrate for the cyclic phosphodiesterase step (17). In contrast, mammalian PI-PLCs generate both cyclic and acyclic inositol phosphate products simultaneously. If cIP is a substrate, the catalytic mechanism for the mammalian enzyme must be sequential. As shown in Table I, cIP is indeed a substrate for PI-PLCgamma 1, and the pH profile for the cyclic phosphodiesterase reaction is consistent with that reported for PIP2 cleavage (15), with the highest enzyme activity observed at pH 5.0. Although Ca2+ was absolutely required for cIP hydrolysis, the dependence of activity on Ca2+ was quite different from that reported for other substrates such as PIP2 and PIP. The maximum activity obtained toward cIP occurred with 2 mM Ca2+; higher Ca2+ led to a slight decrease in activity (Fig. 1A). In contrast, with PIP2 or PIP as the substrate, the Ca2+ requirement was much lower (100 µM), and the PI-PLC specific activity reached a maximum and then decreased with further increases in Ca2+ (20).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Activity of PI-PLCgamma 1 toward cIP (8 mM) at pH 5 (unless otherwise noted) in the absence and presence of additives
Assays included 1 mM Ca2+ in 50 mM acetate, pH 5.0, unless otherwise specified.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   A, effect of Ca2+ concentration on PI-PLCgamma 1 activity toward 8 mM cIP in 50 mM acetate, pH 5.0, and 30 °C. B, specific activity of PI-PLCgamma 1 as a function of cIP concentration in 50 mM acetate, pH 5.0, in the presence of 2 mM Ca2+; the curve is the fit to the Michaelis-Menten equation with Km = 15 mM and Vmax = 2.7 µmol min-1 mg-1.

The dependence of enzyme activity on cIP concentration at pH 5.0 (Fig. 1B) is hyperbolic with a Km of 15 mM and a Vmax of 2.7 µmol min-1 mg-1 obtained by fitting the data with the Michaelis-Menten equation. The activity of the PI-PLCgamma 1 preparation decreased slowly even when stored at -20 °C so that this value for Vmax could be higher. The Km of PI-PLCgamma 1 for cIP was about half that for full-length PI-PLCdelta 1 (16). With a Km of 15 mM (and a lower Vmax than PI cleavage), cIP levels would be expected to accumulate as PI is cleaved and then decrease as I-1-P is generated as long as the release of cIP into the solution is a facile event.

Effect of Interfaces and Solvent on cIP Kinetics-- A kinetic analysis of cIP hydrolysis by PI-PLC in the absence and presence of interfacially active additives allows one to determine whether the interfaces interact directly with the enzyme. In particular, if interfaces enhance cIP hydrolysis, that interfacial activation must be due to an allosteric transition of the enzyme rather than a change in the substrate properties because cIP is water-soluble and has no measurable tendency to associate with interfaces (17). This approach was used to show that bacterial PI-PLC is allosterically activated by a variety of PC aggregates (micelles and bilayers) (17) and that a similar PC activation of PI-PLCdelta 1 requires an intact PH domain (16). In contrast to the large activation observed for bacterial PI-PLC or PI-PLCdelta 1, 8 mM diC7PC micelles inhibited PI-PLCgamma 1-catalyzed hydrolysis of cIP (8 mM) by 33%, and 8 mM TX-100 micelles had only a small activating effect (15%) close to the error limit of the assays, both at pH 5 (Table I) and at pH 7.5 (data not shown). Whatever the role of the PH, SH2, and SH3 domains, any interactions they have with interfaces do not appreciably affect the binding or hydrolysis of cIP.

PA has been shown to enhance PI-PLCgamma 1 activity toward PIP2 (solubilized in TX-100 micelles) at pH 7.5 (21). However, there was no enhancement of cIP hydrolysis in the presence of short chain monomeric or micellar PA at either pH 5.0 or 7.5. Rather, inhibition of the cyclic phosphodiesterase activity was observed at both pH values (Table I). The presence of low concentrations of PIP2 (1 mM) more than sufficient to enhance PI-PLCdelta 1 hydrolysis of cIP (22) also failed to activate PI-PLCgamma 1 toward 8 mM cIP.

Water-miscible organic solvents, such as 24% Me2SO, dimethylformamide, or isopropanol, likewise inhibited PI-PLCgamma 1 at both pH 5.0 and 7.5. Both dimethylformamide and isopropanol were extremely potent inhibitors of the enzyme. This is in marked contrast to the strong activating effect of these solvents on the cyclic phosphodiesterase activity of bacterial PI-PLC (23) and PI-PLCdelta 1 (16). For the latter PI-PLCs, the reduced solvent polarity is thought to activate the enzyme by stabilizing a more active conformation of the enzyme. The mixed solvents could mimic the polarity generated locally by interfaces such as PC bound to the enzyme. That neither PC nor solvent activated PI-PLCgamma 1 suggests that other factors are more critical for activity of this enzyme.

PI Cleavage in TX-100 Mixed Micelles-- With naturally occurring PI, detergents such as TX-100 are often used to form mixed micelles that are good substrates for PI-PLC. Because TX-100 does not affect cIP hydrolysis by PI-PLCgamma 1, it is unlikely to have an allosteric effect on the enzyme. However, interactions of the detergent with PI and cofactor Ca2+ can have pronounced effects on PI-PLC kinetics by virtue of modifying the properties or accessibility of PI in the interface. The reaction rates for PI-PLCgamma 1 catalyzed hydrolysis of 8 mM PI were measured as a function of Ca2+ concentration at different ratios of TX-100 to PI at both pH 5.0 and pH 7.5 (Fig. 2A shows this dependence for TX-100/PI = 2). Similar to the pH dependence of cIP hydrolysis, the rate of PI cleavage was about 20-fold higher at pH 5 than at pH 7.5. The optimal Ca2+ concentration also varied with pH. It decreased when the pH was increased with a value of 0.5 mM Ca2+ at pH 5.0 and 0.1 mM at pH 7.5. Product distribution (cIP/I-1-P) also varied with pH. Both cIP and I-1-P were observed at pH 5 with the ratio of products constant in a particular assay. This behavior is not consistent with rapid release of cIP from the enzyme because the Km for cIP is 15 mM. It suggests that PI-PLCgamma 1, like PI-PLCdelta 1, does not readily release cIP generated in situ but holds it for sufficient time so that the rate of attack by water is comparable with its release (16, 24). Interestingly, there was no observable cIP produced at pH 7.5; I-1-P was the only product detected from PI cleavage.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Ca2+ dependence of PI-PLCgamma 1 catalyzed hydrolysis of 8 mM PI solubilized in 16 mM TX-100 at pH 5.0 (open circle ) and pH 7.5 (bullet ) (A), 48 mM TX-100 at pH 5.0 (B), and 16 mM diC7PC at pH 5.0 (C). The specific activity was calculated from the decrease in intensity of the PI intensity in the 31P NMR assay.

Inhibition of PI-PLC cleavage of PI by Ca2+ occurred above a threshold at each pH, 1 mM at pH 5 and 0.5 mM at pH 7.5, when the ratio of TX-100 to PI was 2. This inhibition by Ca2+ decreased when TX-100/PI = 6 (at fixed PI) where considerably more detergent was present (Fig. 2B). The PI hydrolysis rate and light scattering by TX-100/PI particles at 500 nm as a function of added TX-100 are shown in Fig. 3 (A and C). The maximum PI-PLC activity toward PI was reached at TX-100/PI = 4, although the PI was well solubilized by a 2-fold excess of TX-100 compared with PI (e.g. the reduced light scattering at TX-100/PI = ~2). The requirement for increased TX-100 suggests that PI molecules need to be well separated in TX-100 mixed micelles to obtain the highest activity. The need for separation of PI molecules is balanced by "surface dilution" of the substrate that gives rise to an apparent inhibition (25, 26). In contrast to PI-PLCgamma 1, the bacterial PI-PLC acting on a fixed concentration of PI solubilized in TX micelles exhibited a maximum activity at TX/PI = 1.5 (17) corresponding to conversion of the bulk of the multilamellar vesicles to mixed micelles. As the amount of TX-100 was increased, bacterial PI-PLC activity decreased, presumably because the surface concentration of PI decreased.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   PI-PLCgamma 1 catalyzed cleavage of 8 mM PI as a function of added TX-100 in the presence of 0.5 mM Ca2+ (A) or diC7PC in the presence of 1.0 mM Ca2+ at pH 5.0 (B). In C, PI solubilization by TX-100 is monitored by light scattering at 500 nm.

The ratio of TX-100/PI was held constant and the concentration of PI was varied to obtain an apparent Km for PI solubilized in a TX-100 matrix. Although the apparent Km extracted from this approach is a combination of both a surface adsorption binding step and the true KS value, it is a useful parameter for comparing the effects of different interfaces on enzyme activity. For PI-PLCgamma 1, the apparent Km for PI decreased (from 4.3 to 2.8 mM) as the TX-100/PI ratio increased (Fig. 4, A and B), suggesting that substrate molecules in the more dilute PI surface (0.14 versus 0.33 mole fraction PI) were more accessible to the enzyme. The apparent Vmax also increased with the more dilute PI surface (from 2.6 to 6.4 µmol min-1 mg-1), confirming that PI was a better substrate when more dilute in TX micelles (e.g. at TX/PI = 6 or 0.14 mole fraction versus TX-100/PI = 2 or 0.33 mole fraction). The TX-100 enhanced activation must reflect a modification of substrate in the interface to which the enzyme is sensitive, because TX-100 had only minimal effects on cIP hydrolysis. Interestingly, cooperativity was observed for PI cleavage (but not for cIP hydrolysis) by PI-PLCgamma 1. The lack of cooperativity for cIP hydrolysis strongly suggests that cooperativity is not due to enzyme dimerization or conformational change; rather it is related to substrate aggregation and interface behavior.


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Specific activity at pH 5.0 of PI-PLCgamma 1 as a function of PI at fixed TX-100/PI = 2 with 0.5 mM Ca2+ (A) and TX-100/PI = 6 with 1 mM Ca2+ (B). The curves represent fits to the Hill equation using a Hill coefficient of 2.5 and with an apparent Km of 4.3 ± 0.4 mM and Vmax of 2.6 ± 0.2 µmol min-1 mg-1 at TX-100/PI = 2 and an apparent Km of 2.8 ± 0.5 mM and Vmax of 6.4 ± 0.4 µmol min-1 mg-1 at TX-100/PI = 6. In C is shown the line width of 8 mM PI in TX-100 micelles (at pH 5.0) as a function of Ca2+ concentration. open circle , TX-100/PI = 2; bullet , TX-100/PI = 6.

Insight into the inhibition by high concentrations of Ca2+ was obtained by examining PI aggregation behavior as monitored by the 31P line width of PI in TX-100 micelles. If Ca2+ induces aggregation of PI in TX-100 micelles (not particle growth but clustering of PI), the line width of PI should increase because the mobility of the clustered PI has been reduced. The 31P line widths for PI solubilized in TX-100 at different ratios of PI to TX-100 (and mole fractions of PI) and Ca2+ concentration are shown in Fig. 4C. The PI line width increased at Ca2+ concentrations greater than 1 mM for a TX-100/PI ratio of 2; however, the 31P line width did not change much with TX-100/PI = 6. The increased line width for the higher mole fraction PI indicated a lower mobility for PI consistent with a Ca2+-induced aggregation. The trend of increased aggregation of PI with increasing Ca2+ paralleled the decreased PI hydrolysis rate. For TX-100/PI of >4, the lack of effect of Ca2+ on line width indicated that the PI molecules are well separated and not as susceptible to clustering/aggregation by Ca2+. Thus, a more dilute PI surface may be a better substrate for PI-PLCgamma 1 because it is less susceptible to Ca2+-induced clustering.

PI Cleavage in diC7PC Mixed Micelles-- An excess of diC7PC micelles inhibited PI-PLCgamma 1 activity toward cIP, suggesting that some interaction of this lipid with the enzyme does occur. Nonetheless, these short chain PC micelles can be used as a matrix to solubilize PI for comparison to TX-100/PI mixed micelles. The Ca2+ requirement for PI-PLCgamma 1 cleavage of PI in diC7PC mixed micelles is dramatically different from that in TX mixed micelle as shown in Fig. 2C. PI solubilized in the diC7PC matrix abolished the inhibition of PI-PLCgamma 1 by high concentrations of Ca2+ at both pH 5.0 and pH 7.5; the cIP/I-1-P ratio was also significantly increased (Table II). A likely explanation is that the zwitterionic PC matrix prevents PI from Ca2+-induced clustering, possibly by interacting with the Ca2+. The activity of PI-PLCgamma 1 toward PI solubilized in diC7PC micelles was also much greater than toward PI in TX-100 micelles at pH 5.0. This apparent activation by PC is different from that occurring with bacterial PI-PLC and PI-PLCdelta because the PC interface has no activating effect on cIP hydrolysis; rather there is a modest inhibition at this level of PC. The enzyme-catalyzed hydrolysis rate of a fixed concentration of PI as a function of diC7PC was also different from that for PI solubilized in TX-100 micelles (Fig. 3B). The faster rate of PI hydrolysis in diC7PC micelles and lower requirement for PC to solubilize the PI indicate that in the assay mixture PI is better presented in a PC micelle than in a TX-100 mixed micelle. The kinetic effect is consistent with the Ca2+-induced PI clustering, a physical effect associated with reduced enzyme activity that is reduced in diC7PC micelles.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Ratio of products (cIP/I-1-P) generated by PI-PLCgamma 1 catalyzed cleavage of PI under different conditions
Assays carried out at 30 °C unless otherwise noted.

The Effect of POPA and Other Interfacial Additives-- Previously, it has been reported that PI-PLCgamma 1 can be activated by PA with the PA acting as an allosteric modifier in reducing KS (21). The water-soluble phosphoester AMP inhibited PI-PLC activity (21). AMP also inhibited PI-PLCgamma 1 activity toward cIP (Table I). However, neither PA solubilized in TX-100 or diC7PC nor other interfaces were able to activate PI-PLCgamma 1 toward cIP hydrolysis. The effect of PA on PI hydrolysis could be different, and effects of additives might shed light on the complex interfacial behavior of this system. Therefore, several anionic additives, POPA, lyso-PA, oleic acid, PMPMe, POPS, and SDS, were examined for their effect on PI hydrolysis in TX-100 micelles. The ratio of TX-100/PI/additives was 4.5:1:0.5, and the PI concentration was fixed at 8 mM; the assay pH was 7.5, with 0.1 mM Ca2+ added. The results are shown in Fig. 5. Additives POPA, lyso-PA, oleic acid, and SDS enhanced PI hydrolysis to different extents, whereas PMPMe and POPS had little effect. The PA-induced activation of PI-PLCgamma 1 activity occurred in both TX-100/PI and diC7PC/PI mixed micelles to about the same extent. Because PA activation was the largest, it was examined as a function of Ca2+ concentration (from 0.02 to 0.5 mM) and pH; the surface mole fraction of PA was 0.08, and the surface concentration of substrate PI was 0.16. The maximum PI-PLCgamma 1 activity was reached at 0.1 mM Ca2+; there was no significant change in activity above 0.1 mM Ca2+ (data not shown). Under these conditions, the presence of PA abolished the high Ca2+ inhibition of PI hydrolysis. The pH profile of PI-PLCgamma 1 toward PI was also different in the presence and absence of POPA at 0.3 mM Ca2+ (Fig. 6A). PA had little effect at pH 5.0 and enhanced PI-PLC activity only above pH 6.0. The specific activity of PI-PLCgamma 1 toward PI in the presence of POPA at pH 7 was within a factor of two of the specific activity at pH 5.0 in the absence of PA. This represents a very large enhancement of PI-PLCgamma 1 activity.


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Effect of anionic amphiphilic additives on PI-PLCgamma 1 catalyzed cleavage of PI in TX-100 micelles with 0.1 mM Ca2+, pH 7.5. The ratio of TX-100/PI/additives was 4.5:1:0.5.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   The effect of pH on PI-PLCgamma 1 catalyzed cleavage of PI in TX-100/PI micelles. A, specific activity. B, the ratio of cIP to I-1-P, in the absence (bullet ) and presence (open circle ) of POPA. Assay conditions include TX/PI/POPA = 5:1:0.5, with 8 mM PI and 0.3 mM Ca2+.

Factors That Control cIP/I-1-P Partitioning-- Throughout the time course of an individual assay, the ratio of PI-PLCgamma 1 products (cIP/I-1-P) is constant, consistent with release of cIP and hydrolysis of bound cIP to I-1-P occurring in parallel. However, cIP/I-1-P can be altered by Ca2+ concentration, temperature, pH, or other additives (e.g. PA). The cIP/I-1-P ratio decreased with increasing Ca2+ concentration when PI was solubilized in TX-100 at TX-100/PI = 2 (Fig. 7A). However, increased Ca2+ had a much smaller effect on cIP/I-1-P when the mixed micelles contained a more dilute surface concentration of PI (e.g. TX-100/PI = 6). The ratio of cIP to I-1-P was higher for TX-100/PI = 6 compared with TX-100/PI = 2; the more dilute PI surface favored release of cIP into the solution compared with attack by water to form I-1-P. The cIP/I-1-P product ratio was also higher for PI solubilized in diC7PC micelles (2:1 PC/PI). Because the ratio of cIP to I-1-P is likely to depend on the residence time of the E·cIP complex produced in situ (16, 22), any factors that alter the residence time of E·cIP will affect the ratio of cIP to I-1-P. Interfaces can do this by altering substrate or product exchange or partitioning at the surface as well as by interacting directly with the protein.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   A, the ratio of cIP to I-1-P produced by PI-PLCgamma 1 cleavage of 8 mM PI in 16 mM TX-100 (pH 5.0) as a function of Ca2+. B, effect of temperature on the rate of PI cleavage (open circle ), generation of cIP (black-triangle), and generation of I-1-P (bullet ). C, the ratio of cIP to I-1-P. PI (8 mM) was solubilized in 48 mM TX-100, pH 5.0, with 1 mM Ca2+.

Assay temperature can also affect E·cIP stability (16, 22). The specific activity of PI-PLCgamma 1 was examined at several temperatures (Fig. 7B). Because the apparent Km for PI in TX-100 micelles at TX-100/PI = 6 was 2.8 mM, the PI concentration was fixed at 8 mM in the assay. At this substrate concentration the activity was near its maximum value, and specific activity approximated kcat. The generation of I-1-P was less temperature-dependent than cIP production from 10 to 30 °C, leading to an increase in cIP/I-1-P with temperature (Fig. 7C); above 40 °C the enzyme began to lose activity. Transition state theory applied to data below 40 °C (ln (kcat/T) versus 1/T is linear in that region) indicated that the Delta Delta Hdagger for release of cIP from E·cIP compared with hydrolysis to I-1-P is +32 kJ/mol, whereas the Delta Delta Sdagger is +0.1 kJ/K-mol higher. These values are very close to the Delta Delta Hdagger and Delta Delta Sdagger for PI-PLCdelta 1 (16). Not surprisingly, the entropy cost for generation of product I-1-P is high compared with release of cIP, reflecting the energy cost for ordering a water molecule to attack E·cIP.

Assay pH is another parameter that might also be expected to affect cIP/I-1-P because the cIP hydrolysis step releases a proton. The ratio of cIP/I-1-P decreased rapidly with increasing pH (Fig. 6B). The inclusion of PA in the surface also affected the product ratio. POPA not only increased the PI hydrolysis rate at pH values above 6.0 but also increased the ratio of cIP/I-1-P. PA in these micelles is a monoanion below pH 5.5 and a dianion above pH 7. Perhaps it acts as an interfacial buffer in facilitating proton release from the protein upon cIP hydrolysis.

    DISCUSSION

Mammalian PI-PLC isozymes are multidomain enzymes with key roles in signal transduction by virtue of their generation of second messengers by substrate cleavage. A recurring theme is that their action can be modulated by interfaces interacting with several different domains (PH, C2, SH2, and SH3). Distinguishing kinetic enhancements caused by changes in surface properties from those caused by allosteric effects on kcat is often difficult with a phospholipid substrate. However, hydrolysis of cIP, the water-soluble intermediate in the cleavage of PI, can be used as a probe of allosteric effects of interfaces on PI-PLC enzymes. The high Km of several PI-PLC enzymes for cIP compared with PI suggests that an interfacial substrate binds more effectively to the enzyme. Coupled with water-miscible organic solvent activation in the case of bacterial PI-PLC and PI-PLCdelta 1, the high Km for cIP is likely to reflect difficulties in the enzyme binding a well hydrated polar molecule. In striking contrast to those PLCs, PI-PLCgamma 1 is more efficient in hydrolyzing cIP and does not exhibit solvent activation. Because cIP structure is the same, the lower Km for cIP, lack of cooperativity in cIP binding, and higher Vmax of PI-PLCgamma 1 may reflect a local decreased polarity at the active site. Another key kinetic difference involves PH domains. The N-terminal PH domain of PI-PLCdelta 1 was shown to interact allosterically with amphiphiles (PC or PIP2), causing a 2-fold increase in kcat toward cIP (16, 22). PI-PLCgamma 1 has both an N-terminal domain and a split PH domain between the X and Y domains. Although there is significant sequence homology between the PH domains of delta 1 and gamma 1 isozymes, functional similarity is less obvious because there was no effect of PC or other interfaces (including PIP2 solubilized in TX-100 or diC7PC micelles) on the cyclic phosphodiesterase reaction of PI-PLCgamma 1. The PH domain of PI-PLCgamma 1 could still aid in anchoring the enzyme to an interface; however, such interactions do not affect the catalytic machinery.

PI cleavage by PI-PLCgamma 1 generates both cIP and I-1-P in parallel. Given the kinetic parameters for cIP hydrolysis (which predict a build-up of cIP prior to I-1-P generation), PI-PLCgamma 1 is similar to the delta 1 isozyme where the E·cIP complex has a relatively long lifetime. Because PI-PLCgamma 1 also requires Ca2+ for activity, the cIP may have a binding orientation at the active site similar to that for a nonhydrolyzable cIP analog (27) binding to PI-PLCdelta 1 (24), where the phosphonate is a bidentate ligand of the active site Ca2+. This arrangement would stabilize E·cIP. However, Ca2+ has another more complex effect on the phosphotransferase activity of PI-PLCgamma 1 toward PI. Above a threshold concentration, Ca2+ inhibits the first step of the reaction; the cyclic phosphodiesterase step is not inhibited by high Ca2+. The lack of effect on water-soluble cIP is consistent with the Ca2+ affecting properties of the lipid substrate (e.g. Ca2+-induced PI clustering) and not the enzyme. Alternatively, if one invokes a secondary Ca2+ site on the enzyme, then its occupation affects the phosphotransferase step but not the cIP hydrolysis step. However, because additional nonsubstrate interfacial molecules (that do not affect cIP hydrolysis) reduce the high Ca2+ inhibition, the most reasonable explanation is that high Ca2+ alters substrate-Ca2+ interactions, and these changes inhibit PI-PLCgamma 1.

The pH dependence for PI-PLCgamma 1 action on PI and cIP (roughly a 20-fold higher activity at pH 5 than 7) is also unusual and has mechanistic implications. One or more key residues must be protonated for optimal activity of both phosphotransferase and cyclic phosphodiesterase activities of the full-length enzyme. Interestingly, expression of X and Y domains without the SH2 or SH3 inserted domains yields a highly active enzyme whose pH optimum is shifted to 7 (15). A possible model for the pH dependence of PI-PLCgamma 1 (Fig. 8) has the active site of PI-PLCgamma 1 covered or occluded by the SH2-SH2-SH3 domains at pH 7; this "lid" or cover would be displaced at pH 5 by protonation of key residues (15). At pH 5, this SH2-SH2-SH3 lid is "open" and PI-PLCgamma 1 activity is high; at pH 7, the lid is "closed" and the enzyme has much lower activity. Consistent with this model is the previous observation that protease V8 cleavage activates the enzyme at pH 7, and the cleavage occurs within the lid between the SH3 and Y domains (28). Active enzyme at pH 5 can be inhibited by excess Ca2+ sequestering the substrate PI; this kinetic effect depends on the detergent matrix used to solubilize PI. Ca2+ modulation of the TX-100-PI interface also occurs at pH 7. 


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Proposed model for how pH, interfaces, and PA affect PI-PLCgamma 1. There is a conformational change in the enzyme between pH 5 and 7.5 that controls accessibility of the active site (the lid is open at pH 5 and closed at pH 7) to both water-soluble cIP and interfacial PI. The "inactive" enzyme at pH 7 can be activated by PA or by receptor tyrosine kinase (TK) phosphorylation (indicated by pY). The active enzyme at pH 5 can be inhibited by excess Ca2+ sequestering the substrate PI; this latter effect depends on the detergent matrix used to solubilize PI as well as on the Ca2+ concentration. This Ca2+ modulation of the TX-100-PI interface also occurs at pH 7.

The addition of anionic lipids (PA, LPA, SDS, and oleic acid) also affects the pH profile, enhancing enzyme activity at pH 7.5. The mechanism for the altered hydrolysis of PI could be due to the amphiphiles interacting with either the enzyme or the substrate. One possible explanation is that anionic lipids bind to the enzyme and open the SH2-SH2-SH3 lid. Their presence should enhance both PI and cIP cleavage at pH 7.5. Because only activity toward PI is enhanced, substrate PI must also be needed to facilitate lid opening at pH 7. Alternatively, activation by PA and similar lipids could be the result of altered substrate properties. The anionic amphiphiles could compete with PI and lessen Ca2+-induced aggregation of substrate. However, that is unlikely to account for (i) the very large activation observed at pH 7.5 and (ii) the observation of the same magnitude of PA activation with PI solubilized in diC7PC and TX-100 micelles (the TX-100 surface is much more susceptible to Ca2+-induced clustering than the PC/PI surface, hence one would expect a difference in the behavior of these two interfaces with PA added). The pKa2 of micellar PA or LPA (either short chain PA or long chain PA in TX-100 micelles) is ~7 (29). The significant activation of PI-PLCgamma 1 around this value in the presence of PA suggests that the PA dianion is critical for this effect. PI-PLCgamma 1 is regulated in vivo by phosphorylation (30, 31). Phosphorylation might be another switch that alters the interaction of the SH domains with the rest of the protein leading to activation of PI-PLCgamma 1 at pH 7. Precedence for such interactions can be seen with the SHP-2 structure (32). This offers the possibility of proteins modulating PI-PLCgamma 1 activity by interacting with the SH domains and opening the (hypothetical) lid.

In summary, a model consistent with unusual kinetics of PI-PLCgamma 1 toward both water-soluble cIP and interfacially organized PI has been proposed. It includes specific enzyme conformational changes due to pH or nonsubstrate ligands as well as Ca2+-induced modulation of interfacial substrate properties as ways to alter enzyme specific activity. The model shown in Fig. 8 also makes several predictions that can be tested in the future: (i) there should be a large conformational change (presumably involving the SH domains) in the enzyme between pH 5 and 7 and (ii) because phosphonate esters have pKa values shifted from phosphate esters, a phosphono-PA analog would be expected to activate the enzyme but alter the pH profile of PI hydrolysis in the presence of PA.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Xiaoqing Qian for the initial work on cIP kinetics.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work has been supported by National Institutes of Health Grants GM 26762 (to M. F. R.) and CA75195 (to G. C.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 617-552-3616; Fax: 617-552-2705; E-mail: mary.roberts{at}bc.edu.

The abbreviations used are: PI-PLC, phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C; PA, phosphatidic acid; PC, phosphatidylcholine; diCnPC, diacylphosphatidylcholine with n carbons in each acyl chain; POPA, 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoylphosphatidic acid; PI, phosphatidylinositol; PIP2, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate; PMPMe, 1-palmitoyl-2-myristoylphosphatidylmethanol; POPS, 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoylphosphatidylserine; cIP, D-myo-inositol 1,2-(cyclic)-phosphate; I-1-P, D-myo-inositol-1-phosphate; TX-100, Triton X-100; PH, pleckstrin homology domain.
    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
References

  1. Wu, L., Niemeyer, B., Colly, N., Socolish, M., and Zuker, C. S. (1995) Nature 373, 216-222[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Kamat, A., and Carpenter, G. (1997) Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 8, 109-117[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Rhee, S. G., and Choi, K. D. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 12393-12396[Free Full Text]
  4. Grobler, J. A., and Hurley, J. H. (1996) Protein Sci. 5, 680-686[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Lomasney, J. W., Cheng, H.-F., Wang, L.-P., Kuan, Y.-S., Liu, S.-M., Fesik, S. W., and King, K. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 25316-25326[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Harlan, J. E., Hajduk, P. J., Yoon, H. S., and Fesik, S. W. (1994) Nature 371, 168-170[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Smrcka, A. V., Hepler, J. R., Brown, K. O., and Sternweis, P. O. (1991) Science 350, 804-807
  8. Taylor, S., Chae, H. Z., Rhee, S. G., and Exton, J. H. (1991) Nature 350, 516-518[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Ji, Q.-S., Winnier, G. E., Niswender, K. D., Horstman, D., Wisdom, R., Magnuson, M. A., and Carpenter, G. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 2999-3003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Kim, H. K., Kim, J. W., Zilberstein, A., Margolis, B., Kim, J. G., Schlessinger, J., and Rhee, S. G. (1991) Cell 65, 435-441[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Margolis, B., Rhee, S. G., Felder, S., Mervic, M., Lyall, R., Levitzki, A., Ullrich, A., Zilberstein, A., and Schlessinger, J. (1989) Cell 57, 1101-1107[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Buergess, W. H., Dionne, C. A., Kaplow, J., Mudd, R., Friesel, R., Zilberstein, A., Schlessinger, J., and Jaye, M. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 4770-4777[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Schlessinger, J. (1994) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 4, 25-30[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Emori, Y., Homma, Y., Sorimachi, H., Kawasaki, H., Nakanishi, O., Suzuki, K., and Takenawa, T. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 21885-21890[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Horstman, D., DeStefano, K., and Carpenter, G. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 7518-7521[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Wu, Y., Perisic, O., Williams, R. L., Katan, M., and Roberts, M. F. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 11223-11233[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Zhou, C., Wu, Y., and Roberts, M. F. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 347-355[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Horstman, D. A., Ball, R., and Carpenter, G. (1995) Protein Expression Purif. 6, 278-283[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Minta, A., Kao, J. P. Y., and Tsien, R. Y. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 8171-8178[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Ryu, S. H., Cho, K. S., Lee, K.-Y., Suh, P-G., and Rhee, S. G. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 12511-12518[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Jones, G. A., and Carpenter, G. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 20845-20850[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Roberts, M. F., Wu, Y., Perisic, O., Williams, R. L., and Katan, M. (1998) in Phosphoinositides: Chemistry, Biochemistry and Biomedical Applications (Bruzik, K. S., ed), Vol. 718, pp. 137-157, American Chemical Society, Washington, D. C.
  23. Wu, Y., and Roberts, M. F. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 8514-8521[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Essen, L. O., Perisic, O., Katan, M., Wu, Y., Roberts, M. F., and Williams, R. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 1704-1718[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Hendrickson, H. S., and Dennis, E. A. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 5734-5739[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Dennis, E. A. (1973) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 158, 485-493[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Wu, Y., Zhou, C., and Roberts, M. F. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 356-363[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Fernald, A. W., Jones, G. A., and Carpenter, G. (1994) Biochem. J. 302, 503-509[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Garigapati, V. R., Bian, J., and Roberts, M. F. (1995) J. Colloid Interface Sci. 169, 486-492[CrossRef]
  30. Nishibe, S., Wahl, M. I., Hernandez-Sotomayor, S. M. T., Tonks, N. K., Rhee, S. G., and Carpenter, G. (1990) Science 250, 1253-1256[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Goldschmidt-Clermont, P. J., Kim, J. W., Machesky, L. M., Rhee, S. G., and Pollard, T. D. (1991) Science 251, 1231-1233[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Hof, P., Pluskey, S., Dhe-Paganon, S., Eck, M. J., and Shoelson, S. E. (1998) Cell 92, 441-450[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.