Mapping the Phospholipid-binding Surface and Translocation Determinants of the C2 Domain from Cytosolic Phospholipase A2*

Olga PerisicDagger , Hugh F. Paterson§, Georgina MosedaleDagger , Samuel Lara-GonzálezDagger , and Roger L. WilliamsDagger

From the Dagger  Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QH, United Kingdom and the § Cancer Research Campaign Centre for Cell and Molecular Biology, Chester Beatty Laboratories, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, United Kingdom

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cytosolic phospholipase A2 (cPLA2) plays a key role in the generation of arachidonic acid, a precursor of potent inflammatory mediators. Intact cPLA2 is known to translocate in a calcium-dependent manner from the cytosol to the nuclear envelope and endoplasmic reticulum. We show here that the C2 domain of cPLA2 alone is sufficient for this calcium-dependent translocation in living cells. We have identified sets of exposed hydrophobic residues in loops known as calcium-binding region (CBR) 1 and CBR3, which surround the C2 domain calcium-binding sites, whose mutation dramatically decreased phospholipid binding in vitro without significantly affecting calcium binding. Mutation of a residue that binds calcium ions (D43N) also eliminated phospholipid binding. The same mutations that prevent phospholipid binding of the isolated C2 domain in vitro abolished the calcium-dependent translocation of cPLA2 to internal membranes in vivo, suggesting that the membrane targeting is driven largely by direct interactions with the phospholipid bilayer. Using fluorescence quenching by spin-labeled phospholipids for a series of mutants containing a single tryptophan residue at various positions in the cPLA2 C2 domain, we show that two of the calcium-binding loops, CBR1 and CBR3, penetrate in a calcium-dependent manner into the hydrophobic core of the phospholipid bilayer, establishing an anchor for docking the domain onto the membrane.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cytosolic phospholipase A2 (cPLA2)1 is an 85-kDa protein that hydrolyzes phospholipids containing arachidonate at the sn-2 position (Refs. 1 and 2; reviewed in Refs. 3-6). This enzyme has no sequence homology to any other phospholipase A2 and is capable of functioning in receptor-regulated, agonist-induced arachidonic acid release (7, 8). Recent work with mice lacking a gene for cPLA2 has demonstrated that cPLA2 has a critical, nonredundant role in the production of eicosanoids and platelet-activating factor in the process of inflammation, anaphylaxis, and reproduction (9, 10). The activity of cPLA2 is regulated by calcium; however, the role of calcium is to promote membrane binding rather than participating in catalysis directly. An increase in intracellular calcium triggered by calcium ionophores or agonists such as histamine or IgE/antigen causes the translocation of cPLA2 from the cytosol to the nuclear membrane and endoplasmic reticulum (11-14), where it co-localizes with other enzymes involved in eicosanoid metabolism, such as prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase-1 and -2, 5-lipoxygenase, and 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein (11, 15). The activity of cPLA2 is also regulated via phosphorylation of the enzyme, and for at least some agonists, phosphorylation of cPLA2 is a requisite step in its activation (4, 5). Detailed studies of the role of calcium and phosphorylation in arachidonic acid release have shown that a sustained increase in intracellular calcium is sufficient to induce arachidonic acid release, whereas either sustained phosphorylation of cPLA2 or a transient increase in calcium alone is not sufficient, but they can synergize in this process (16).

Recent work suggests that cPLA2 has three functionally distinct domains: an N-terminal C2 domain necessary for Ca2+-dependent phospholipid binding, a C-terminal Ca2+-independent catalytic region capable of hydrolyzing monomeric substrates but unable to associate with membranes (17), and a putative pleckstrin homology domain within this region that may be responsible for the ability of the enzyme to make specific 1:1 interactions with phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (18). The structure of the N-terminal C2 domain of cPLA2 has been determined using both crystallographic (19) and NMR (20) techniques. The domain consists of an anti-parallel beta -sandwich composed of two four-stranded sheets. The overall fold of the cPLA2 C2 domain is similar to the C2 domains from other proteins: synaptotagmin I (SytI-C2A) (21), phospholipase Cdelta 1 (22), protein kinase Cdelta (23), and protein kinase Cbeta (24). The topology of the domain is identical to that of phospholipase Cdelta 1 and the recently reported calcium-independent C2 domain from protein kinase Cdelta (23), whereas it is a circular permutation of the SytI-C2A and protein kinase Cbeta topology. Consistent with the equilibrium binding and stopped-flow kinetic experiments that demonstrated cooperative binding of two calcium ions to the cPLA2 C2 domain (25), the crystal structure of cPLA2-C2 has shown two adjacent calcium ions bound at one end of the domain via residues at the bases of three loops known as calcium-binding regions (CBRs) 1-3 (19).

NMR studies with dodecylphosphocholine micelles have identified several discrete regions in cPLA2-C2 that show large chemical shift perturbations in 15N heteronuclear single quantum correlation spectra upon micelle binding (20). These regions, which include residues within the three CBRs, residues at the ends of strands immediately adjacent to the CBRs, and residues of strands 2 and 3, could thus directly interact with phospholipids or have their conformation changed by phospholipid binding.

In this paper, we have employed a set of green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusions of cPLA2 deletion variants to show that the C2 domain is both necessary and sufficient for translocation of the enzyme to internal membranes in response to calcium. We have also demonstrated that a set of hydrophobic residues present in the calcium-binding loops at one end of the domain is necessary for Ca2+-dependent membrane translocation in vivo and phospholipid binding in vitro. Membrane binding is accompanied by penetration of two loops, CBR1 and CBR3, into the hydrophobic core of the phospholipid bilayer.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

GFP-cPLA2 Fusion Constructs-- Fig. 1 illustrates the various constructs that were employed in our studies. For in vivo translocation experiments, a series of human cPLA2 constructs fused to the C terminus of GFP were made: full-length cPLA2 (amino acids 1-749), a variant removing a short flexible N-terminal peptide (amino acids 17-749), a C2 domain-deleted variant (amino acids 148-749), or a C2 domain-only variant (amino acids 17-141). In the context of the full-length cPLA2 construct, three single or multiple site-specific mutants were designed to examine the effect of mutations of a calcium-binding residue (D43N) and residues proposed to be important for phospholipid binding (M38N/L39A and Y96S/V97S/M98Q). Except for the GFP-cPLA2-(17-141) fusion, all other GFP-cPLA2 fusions had a His6 tag directly fused to the C terminus of the construct. GFP-cPLA2 fusions were cloned in a vector (26) with a cytomegalovirus immediate-early gene promoter and the GFP protein (preceded by the sequence MVTSPVEK) containing several substitutions previously described to enhance fluorescence (S65T) and to increase solubility and thermostability of GFP (V163A/S175G/I167T) (27). All the cPLA2 constructs except for cPLA2-(17-141) were cloned as BamHI/XbaI fragments into the GFP-containing vector cut with the same enzymes (the internal BamHI site in the cPLA2 gene was mutated), and the resulting constructs had three residues (LGS) between the GFP and cPLA2 sequences. The cPLA2-(17-141) construct was cloned as a BglII/EcoRI fragment into the vector, and the final construct had LGSMEQKLISEEDLRS between the GFP and cPLA2 sequences.

Escherichia coli Expression and Purification of Wild-type and Mutant cPLA2 C2 Domains-- A plasmid expressing the C2 domain of cPLA2 (residues 17-141 of the intact enzyme) was described previously (19). For in vitro binding studies, site-specific mutants of this domain were prepared by polymerase chain reaction-directed mutagenesis and expressed in mini-pRSET, a version of pRSET (Invitrogen) modified to encode a 17-residue N-terminal tag (MRGSHHHHHHGLVPRGS) containing a His6 tag for affinity purification and a thrombin cleavage site. For the Trp mutants used for fluorescence quenching studies, the wild-type Trp residue at position 71 was mutated to Phe, and a single Trp residue was introduced at various positions in the C2 domain. The wild-type cPLA2 C2 domain was insoluble and expressed in inclusion bodies. The proteins were refolded in vitro using the protocol essentially as described previously (19). The inclusion body pellet from 0.5 liter of cell culture was dissolved in 40 ml of 8 M urea and 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2 (denaturation buffer), by stirring for 2 h at room temperature and centrifuged for 30 min at 17,000 rpm in a Sorvall SS34 rotor to remove the insoluble debris. Denatured protein was bound in batch to 1.5 ml of Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid-agarose (QIAGEN Inc.), and the resin was washed four times with 50 ml (each wash) of denaturation buffer. Protein was eluted with 10 ml of 300 mM imidazole in denaturation buffer. The protein was concentrated to 10-15 mg/ml using a Centriprep 10 at room temperature, and 1 ml of the purified protein was renatured by adding 50-µl aliquots into a rapidly stirred solution of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2, and 1.5 M urea at room temperature. After stirring for 1 h, the solution was filtered through a 0.2-µm filter (Millex-GV, Millipore Corp.) and run on a 1.6-ml Poros 20HQ column equilibrated in 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0. The renatured protein was eluted with a gradient of 0-1 M NaCl (the folded protein eluted with ~150 mM NaCl). The C2 domain mutant M38N/L39A and all the Trp mutants were insoluble and were refolded in the same way as the wild type, whereas two of the site-specific mutants (D43N and Y96S/V97S/M98Q) were soluble and required no refolding. The proteins were purified on Ni2+-agarose as described above, but without urea, and by ion-exchange chromatography on a Poros 20HQ column.

Translocation Studies by Fluorescence Analysis-- PtK2 cells (potooro kidney cells) were microinjected with plasmid DNA (50 µg/ml, except for GFP-cPLA2-(17-141), which was injected at 10 µg/ml). Microinjected cells were incubated overnight to allow adequate expression of the plasmids, and culture medium was replaced with Hanks' balanced salt solution without phenol red containing 1.25 mM CaCl2 (catalog No. 14025, Life Technologies, Inc.). The GFP fluorescence of the live cells was recorded using an MRC 1024 confocal imaging system both before and after addition of 4-bromo-A23187 calcium ionophore (Alexis) at a concentration of 20 µM for 3-5 min.

Calcium Binding Assays-- The ability of the recombinant cPLA2 C2 domains to bind calcium was tested qualitatively by calcium-dependent band shift on nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels. Recombinant C2 domains (0.5 mg/ml) were mixed in a 20-µl reaction with 2 mM EDTA in the presence or absence of 2.5 mM CaCl2 for 5 min at room temperature, and 4-µl aliquots were analyzed by electrophoresis on native 20% polyacrylamide Phast gels (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The positions of the bands were visualized by staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250.

The Ca2+ binding affinity of recombinant C2 domains (wild type and M38N/L39A and Y96S/V97S/M98Q mutants) was measured by isothermal titration calorimetry with an Omega calorimeter (MicroCal Inc.) using the same conditions as described previously for the cPLA2 C2 domain (20). All proteins used for titrations were dialyzed against 20 mM Tris, pH 7. Aliquots (4 µl each) of calcium solution (2.4 mM) were injected at 4.6-min intervals into the protein solution (40 µM) in a 1.34-ml sample cell at 27 °C. Control experiments were carried out in the absence of protein to determine the heats of dilutions, which were subtracted from the apparent heat of binding prior to data analysis. Data were analyzed using the ORIGIN software package provided with the calorimeter.

Protein Binding to Large Multilamellar Vesicles-- Binding of recombinant C2 domains to large multilamellar vesicles prepared with phosphatidylcholine from brain (Avanti Polar Lipids) was carried out as described previously (28). The reaction mixtures (400 µl) contained 5 µg of C2 domains (final concentration of 0.77 µM), 100 µg of large multilamellar vesicles (final concentration of 330 µM), and 2 mM EDTA with or without 2.2 mM CaCl2. After incubation for 5 min at room temperature, the reaction mixtures were centrifuged for 15 min at 4 °C, and the pellets were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

Fluorescence Measurements-- Fluorescence measurements were carried out on a Hitachi F-4500 fluorescence spectrometer. The intrinsic fluorescence of Trp-71 that is present in the wild-type C2 domain and D43N, M38N/L39A, and Y96S/V97S/M98Q mutants was measured using an excitation wavelength of 284 nm, and emission scans were taken from 300 to 400 nm.

Binding of C2 domains to large unilamellar vesicles was quantified by measuring fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), using Trp-71 as the donor and phosphatidylcholine vesicles containing dansyl-PE (5% mol/mol; Molecular Probes, Inc.) as the acceptor, at 20 °C. Phosphatidylcholine (PC from brain; Avanti Polar Lipids) and dansyl-PE in chloroform were mixed, dried under a stream of nitrogen and then in vacuo for at least 1 h, and resuspended in buffer F (150 mM NaCl and 20 mM Tris, pH 7.5). Large unilamellar vesicles were prepared by extrusion through a polycarbonate filter (100-nm pore size). Binding reactions contained 0.5 µM C2 domain, 1 mM EDTA plus 2 mM CaCl2 (or EDTA alone), and various amounts of phospholipids in 2 ml of buffer F. Samples were excited at 284 nm (5-nm slit width), and emission was monitored at 530 nm (10-nm slit width); a 450-nm long-pass filter was placed on the emission side. Relative FRET was calculated as (F+Ca - F-Ca)/Delta Fmax, where F+Ca represents the emission of the vesicles and the C2 domain in the presence of saturating levels of calcium, F-Ca represents the emission of the vesicles and the protein in the absence of calcium, and Delta Fmax is the maximal energy transfer obtained from the binding curve. The data were analyzed by plotting relative FRET against the total lipid concentration and fitting the data to the binding equation y = n(x/(Kd + x)), where y represents relative FRET, x is the total lipid concentration, n is a normalization constant, and Kd is the apparent equilibrium dissociation constant.

Fluorescence Quenching by Doxyl-labeled Phosphatidylcholine-- Large unilamellar vesicles were prepared by extrusion through a polycarbonate filter (100-nm pore size) using an Avanti Polar Lipids extruder. For cPLA2-C2 binding assays, the vesicles contained either 100% PC (control) or 90% PC and 10% doxyl-labeled PC, with a doxyl group at position 7 or 12 of the sn-2-acyl chain (Avanti Polar Lipids). For SytI-C2A binding assays, vesicles contained 50% phosphatidylserine and 50% PC (control) or 50% phosphatidylserine, 40% PC, and 10% doxyl-PC. The protein sample (final concentration of 5 µM) was diluted into a 1.6-ml assay containing 250 µM total phospholipid in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, and 2 mM EDTA in a 3-ml quartz cuvette with a magnetic stirrer. Fluorescence spectra were taken before and after addition of calcium to a final concentration of 3 mM. Samples were excited at 288 nm (2.5-nm slit width), and emission spectra were collected from 300 to 450 nm (5-nm slit width) at 20 °C.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The C2 Domain of cPLA2 Is Sufficient for Calcium-dependent Translocation in Vivo-- To determine if the C2 domain is sufficient for membrane translocation in response to an increase in intracellular Ca2+ or whether other features of the intact enzyme are also essential, a series of GFP-cPLA2 fusions were constructed (Fig. 1), and their translocation was observed in intact cells using confocal fluorescence microscopy. As shown in Fig. 2, the GFP fusion of full-length cPLA2 (GFP-cPLA2-(1-749)) translocates from the cytosol to internal membranes in a pattern that is consistent with binding to nuclear membranes, the endoplasmic reticulum, and the Golgi. This is in agreement with previous immunofluorescence studies of cPLA2 using fixed cells (11-14). Structural studies have shown that the N-terminal 16 residues of the enzyme are flexible and do not contribute to the structural integrity of the N-terminal C2 domain (19, 20). The GFP-cPLA2-(17-749) construct shows calcium-dependent translocation identical to the full-length enzyme. Using fixed cells, it was previously shown that an N-terminal truncation variant of cPLA2 (amino acids 178-749) does not translocate in response to calcium (13). Fig. 2 shows that the deletion variant corresponding to removal of the C2 domain only, the GFP-cPLA2-(148-749) construct, also does not translocate to internal membranes. However, a GFP fusion with only the C2 domain, GFP-cPLA2-(17-141), is capable of Ca2+-dependent membrane translocation in vivo. These results show that the C2 domain consisting of residues 17-141 of cPLA2 is both necessary and sufficient for Ca2+-dependent translocation. Although the C2 domain alone enables translocation, membrane interactions by the remainder of the enzyme including the putative pleckstrin homology domain may be important for the kinetics of translocation or for the fine-tuning of the enzyme activity once on the membrane surface (18, 29).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Schematic representation of the cPLA2 domain structure and constructs used for in vivo and in vitro studies. A, shown is a putative domain organization of cPLA2. Only the N-terminal C2 domain (residues 17-141) has been verified by structural studies. B, for in vivo translocation studies in PtK2 cells, full-length, truncated, and/or mutated cPLA2 was fused to the C terminus of GFP. C, shown is a schematic diagram of C2 domain constructs expressed in E. coli and used for in vitro binding to phospholipids. PH, pleckstrin homology.


View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Calcium ionophore-induced translocation of GFP-cPLA2 constructs in PtK2 cells. The left panel for a given construct illustrates fluorescence of a GFP fusion for a field of transfected cells. The right panel illustrates the same field 3-5 min after addition of 4-bromo-A23187 calcium ionophore at a concentration of 20 µM. Translocation was observed only for constructs containing the C2 domain (residues 17-141). The pattern of fluorescence upon ionophore treatment suggests translocation to nuclear membranes, the endoplasmic reticulum, and the Golgi.

Mutations in Loops CBR1 and CBR3 Selectively Inhibit Phospholipid Binding by the C2 Domain in Vitro and by the Full-length Enzyme in Vivo-- Several mutants were examined in the context of the isolated C2 domain to assess the contributions of various residues to membrane binding. The experimentally determined structure of the cPLA2 C2 domain served as a guide to select residues that would be likely candidates for participation in membrane interactions. The double mutant M38N/L39A and the triple mutant Y96S/V97S/M98Q were examined in order to ascertain the importance of the exposed hydrophobic residues in CBR1 and CBR3, respectively, for membrane binding. In vitro binding studies were carried out for the isolated C2 domains, whereas the effect of the mutants on in vivo translocation was assayed in the context of the full-length enzyme. All of the C2 domain constructs used for in vitro binding assays were monomers as analyzed by gel filtration (data not shown) and correctly folded as judged by intrinsic fluorescence spectra (Fig. 3). The membrane binding properties of these mutants were compared with those of the D43N mutant, in which the acidic residue shown crystallographically to bind both Ca2+ ions was replaced by a neutral analogue.


View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Analysis of purified C2 domain mutants. A, analysis of the wild-type (WT) and mutant cPLA2 C2 domains by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Samples of purified wild-type and mutant cPLA2 C2 domains were analyzed by electrophoresis on 20% SDS-polyacrylamide Phast gels. Molecular mass markers (47, 30, 19, 15, 6, and 3 kDa) are shown in the right lane. B, comparison of intrinsic fluorescence spectra of the refolded wild-type and M38N/L39A C2 domains and solubly expressed D43N and Y96S/V97S/M98Q mutants with the spectrum of the urea-denatured wild-type C2 domain. The denatured protein has a peak at 348 nm, nearly identical to that of a free tryptophan. The refolded and solubly expressed proteins have an identical emission wavelength maximum at 326 nm.

The ability of C2 domain mutants to bind Ca2+ was first evaluated using a rapid gel-shift assay, which is based on a large difference in the overall charge between a Ca2+-bound and Ca2+-free form of cPLA2-C2 and, consequently, differential migration on a native gel. Neither the mutations in CBR1 nor CBR3 significantly affected Ca2+ binding at the high concentration of free Ca2+ (0.5 mM) that was used in the Ca2+-dependent gel-shift assay, whereas, as expected, the D43N mutant did not bind Ca2+ (Fig. 4A). The calcium binding affinities of the CBR1 and CBR3 mutants were further examined by isothermal titration calorimetry and compared with those of the wild-type C2 domain. For wild-type cPLA2-C2, a Kd of 2.4 µM was determined, in excellent agreement with the Kd of 1.7 µM that was determined previously for a similar cPLA2-C2 construct (residues 1-138) by isothermal titration calorimetry under the same experimental conditions (20). Mutations in CBR1 and CBR3 had only a modest effect on calcium binding affinities, with Kd values of 9.2 and 7.6 µM, respectively. Despite their abilities to bind Ca2+, the CBR1 and CBR3 mutants did not bind PC vesicles at saturating Ca2+ concentrations as shown by both multilamellar large vesicle sedimentation assays (Fig. 4B) and FRET assays (Fig. 4C). Using the FRET analysis, an apparent Kd for PC binding of 11 ± 2 µM was obtained for the wild-type C2 domain, in agreement with previously reported affinities (25, 29). In contrast, none of the mutants showed any measurable FRET at the highest lipid concentration used (250 µM) and 1 mM Ca2+. Higher phospholipid concentrations could not be tested due to an inner filter effect of the lipid vesicles. As a consequence of its impaired Ca2+ binding, the D43N mutant also showed no detectable binding to PC vesicles (Fig. 4, B and C). All three mutations that inhibited in vitro vesicle binding also abolished in vivo membrane translocation of the full-length protein in response to Ca2+ (Fig. 5).


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Calcium and phospholipid binding properties of C2 domain mutants. A, calcium binding was qualitatively assessed by mobility shift of the domains in the presence of Ca2+ on native 20% polyacrylamide Phast gels. The cPLA2 C2 domain has an overall negative charge in the absence of calcium and migrates farther toward the anode than when it is bound to calcium. The position of the bands was visualized by staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250. B, shown is the binding of wild-type (WT) and mutant cPLA2 C2 domains to large multilamellar vesicles (MLV). Proteins were incubated with large multilamellar vesicles composed of PC in the presence or absence of 0.2 mM free CaCl2 for 5 min, and the vesicles were then sedimented by centrifugation. Protein bound to the sedimented vesicles was analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by Coomassie Blue staining. C, shown is the binding of wild-type () and mutant cPLA2 C2 domains including the CBR1 (), CBR3 (triangle ), and D43N (+) mutants to large unilamellar vesicles measured by fluorescence energy transfer. Binding reactions contained 0.5 µM protein, 1 mM EDTA with or without 2 mM CaCl2, and increasing concentrations (from 2.5 to 250 µM) of PC/dansyl-PE vesicles in 2 ml of buffer containing 20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, and 150 mM NaCl at 20 °C. The solid line represents the nonlinear least-squares fit to the data obtained for the wild-type cPLA2 C2 domain. The apparent Kd for PC binding in the presence of 1 mM CaCl2 for the wild-type cPLA2 C2 domain was 11 ± 2 µM. Data for the mutants were not fitted since no detectable binding was observed for any of them.


View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Mutations of the C2 domain prevent translocation of GFP-cPLA2 in PtK2 cells. Mutants of the full-length GFP-cPLA2 construct (amino acids 1-749) were assayed for translocation in vivo. The left panel for a given mutant illustrates fluorescence of the GFP fusion for a field of transfected cells. The right panel illustrates the same field 3-5 min after addition of 4-bromo-A23187 calcium ionophore at a concentration of 20 µM. All three of the C2 domain mutants abolish translocation.

Mapping the Phospholipid-binding Surface by Shifts in Intrinsic Fluorescence Maxima-- A series of mutants were constructed to replace single surface-exposed hydrophobic residues (usually phenylalanine) with tryptophan. By monitoring the intrinsic fluorescence of these mutants, it is possible to infer which of these residues enters a more non-polar environment upon vesicle binding. These Trp replacements were constructed in the context of a mutant enzyme in which the only endogenous Trp residue in the wild-type enzyme (Trp-71) was replaced by phenylalanine. The positions at which Trp replacement mutants were created are illustrated in Fig. 6 and include F35W in CBR1, F49W at the end of strand beta 2, F63W at the beginning of CBR2, and Y96W and V97W in CBR3. In the presence of PC vesicles, the addition of Ca2+ to the CBR1 or CBR3 Trp mutants resulted in a blue shift of the fluorescence spectrum (Fig. 7A and Table I), whereas the wild type and F49W showed no significant change in the emission wavelength maximum, and the F63W mutant had its maximum slightly red-shifted. The large blue shift for the CBR1 (F35W) and CBR3 (Y96W and V97W) Trp mutants indicates that these residues are in an environment that is much more protected from solvent when the domain is bound to vesicles. This would be consistent with these residues being directly involved in vesicle binding. For the wild-type enzyme, the single Trp present (Trp-71) is deeply buried in the core of the domain and shows only a minimal shift upon addition of Ca2+ and PC vesicles. The F49W mutant also showed no blue shift, and F63W showed a slight red shift, suggesting that these residues do not enter a more non-polar environment upon vesicle binding. The maximum emission wavelength of F63W upon vesicle binding is nearly the same as that of free tryptophan, suggesting an extreme solvent exposure. The red shift and the pronounced change in fluorescence intensity displayed by the CBR2 mutant (F63W) may be indicative of conformational changes in the domain or may indicate interaction with the polar region of the membrane. Taken together, the results show that residues in CBR1 and CBR3 insert into the hydrophobic portions of the membrane, whereas residues 49 and 63 remain in a polar environment.


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Tryptophan replacement mutants used for intrinsic fluorescence quenching studies. The schematic illustrates the positions of the exposed hydrophobic residues that were selected for Trp replacement mutants. Each mutation was done in the context of a W71F mutant of the wild-type cPLA2 C2 domain so that each mutant would have a single Trp residue. The Ca2+ sites observed structurally are shown as black spheres. The three loops at one end of the domain that are involved in calcium binding are referred to as CBR1, CBR2, and CBR3 (19, 47). The figure was prepared with BOBSCRIPT (48).


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Intrinsic fluorescence spectra of the wild-type and Trp replacement mutants. A, the intrinsic fluorescence (arbitrary units) of the wild-type (WT) and mutant cPLA2 C2 domains with large unilamellar PC vesicles either in the absence (solid lines) or presence (dashed lines) of 1 mM free CaCl2. B, intrinsic fluorescence of the cPLA2 C2 domains with 1 mM free CaCl2 in the presence of large unilamellar vesicles of 100% PC (solid lines), 90% PC and 10% 12-doxyl-PC (dotted lines), or 90% PC and 10% 7-doxyl-PC (dashed lines).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Probing membrane binding and penetration of single tryptophan cPLA2 C2 domain mutants by fluorescence measurements
For the cPLA2 C2 domains containing a single tryptophan residue at a different position on the surface of the C2 domain, maximum emission wavelengths corresponding to the spectra presented in Fig. 7 are listed. The fluorescence was measured first in the presence of PC vesicles and 2 mM EDTA and then following addition of 3 mM CaCl2. The integrated values for the fluorescence spectra of the mutants in the presence of calcium and vesicles containing 100% PC were compared with the spectra obtained in the presence of calcium and vesicles composed of 90% PC and 10% 7-doxyl- or 12-doxyl-PC. The percent quenching in the presence of doxyl-labeled PC relative to the 100% PC vesicles is listed.

Both Loops CBR1 and CBR3 Become Deeply Immersed in the Hydrophobic Portion of the Membrane-- We had previously shown that the cPLA2 C2 domain penetrates into membranes upon binding (28). The change in intrinsic fluorescence upon vesicle binding suggests that CBR1 and CBR3 are interacting with the membrane. To determine the extent to which the domain penetrates into the membrane and its orientation on the membrane, we examined quenching of the intrinsic fluorescence of the Trp mutants by doxyl probes covalently attached at either position 7 or 12 of the sn-2-acyl chain. Chapman and Davis (30) had employed similar methodology on SytI-C2A and found that Phe-234 and, to a lesser extent, Phe-231 (both in CBR3) penetrate into the phospholipid membrane. Fig. 7B and Table I show that in cPLA2, both CBR1 and CBR3 Trp mutants have their fluorescence quenched by the doxyl-PC lipids. In contrast, the wild-type (Trp-71), F49W, and F63W C2 domains were unaffected by the presence of doxyl-PC. Because both 7- and 12-doxyl-PC show equivalent fluorescence quenching, the residues of CBR1 and CBR3 must be immersed so that they are <10-11 Å from both positions 7 and 12 of the sn-2-acyl chain (31). Our results indicating that CBR3 and CBR1 of cPLA2-C2 penetrate into the membrane whereas CBR2 does not are consistent with the character of these loops. In all C2 domains of known structure, there is at least one exposed hydrophobic residue at the tip of CBR3. In cPLA2-C2, CBR1 has a much more hydrophobic character than in other C2 domains. Our results with doxyl-PCs indicate that CBR2 does not penetrate into the membrane, consistent with the red shift observed for the F63W mutant observed upon binding PC vesicles.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The importance of translocation to membranes as an activating mechanism for various enzymes in cells is becoming increasingly apparent. A variety of ubiquitous protein modules function as mediators of translocation. For example, the role of pleckstrin homology domains in recognizing specific phospholipids and bringing about translocation to membranes has been demonstrated for a range of signaling proteins (reviewed in Ref. 32). Although C2 domains that are present in a great number of proteins have been implicated in membrane binding and vesicle fusion (33, 34), the contribution of these domains to cellular localization has been established for only a few proteins. For example, it has been shown by deletion analysis that the C2 domain is necessary for calcium-dependent translocation of protein kinase Cgamma and Nedd4 to plasma membranes (35, 36) and of cPLA2 to nuclear membranes and the endoplasmic reticulum (13). However, we have demonstrated here that the cPLA2 C2 domain alone is sufficient for calcium-dependent translocation in intact cells. We have furthermore demonstrated that the epitopes of the cPLA2 C2 domain that penetrate into the lipid bilayer are essential for membrane binding and translocation. Other parts of the intact cPLA2 beyond the C2 domain may modify lipid specificity, calcium sensitivity, and enzyme activity at the target site (18, 29). In particular, the ability of the intact enzyme to bind phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate at low calcium concentrations (18, 37) has been attributed to the presence of a pleckstrin homology domain. The binding of the anionic phosphatidylmethanol to the intact enzyme in the absence of calcium, but not to the C2 domain alone (29), also indicates that there are multiple sites of membrane binding on the enzyme. Although our results show that the C2 domain is sufficient for membrane translocation in response to calcium ionophore, other pathways of activation of cPLA2 may rely on these additional sites of membrane interaction.

Our mutagenesis results show that membrane interaction for the cPLA2 C2 domain is driven largely by hydrophobic forces. We have demonstrated that the CBR1 and CBR3 mutants, which replace hydrophobic residues with polar ones, M38N/L39A and Y96S/V97S/M98Q, have functional Ca2+ binding, but show no detectable binding to phospholipid membranes in vitro or in vivo. Our results are consistent with the observation that cPLA2 C2 domain binding to PC vesicles is enhanced at high ionic strengths (38). Calcium binding is clearly another critical factor in membrane interaction. The importance of Asp-43, which makes interactions with each of the two Ca2+ ions bound to cPLA2-C2, is confirmed by the loss of membrane binding by the D43N mutant. By preventing Ca2+ neutralization of the negatively charged residues, there may be an electrostatic repulsion between the protein and negative charges in the membrane. For the protein kinase Cbeta II C2 domain, it was shown that replacing acidic calcium-binding residues with basic residues did not result in calcium-independent membrane binding (39), suggesting that charge neutralization is not calcium's only role in membrane binding. Another role for Ca2+ ions might be acting as direct ligands of the phosphate groups in the membrane such as seen for annexin V (40).

Given the importance of the hydrophobic residues in CBR1 and CBR3 for membrane binding, we sought to determine whether these residues penetrate into the hydrophobic portions of the lipid bilayer and, if so, to what extent they are immersed in the membrane. The ability of the doxyl labels at positions 7 and 12 of the sn-2-acyl chains to quench fluorescence from residues in CBR3 indicates that this loop is immersed in the hydrophobic core of the membrane. The CBR3 loops in SytI-C2A (30) and in protein kinase Calpha (41) have also been shown to penetrate into lipid bilayers, suggesting that C2 domains in general may be similarly oriented when bound to membranes. A more surprising result from the doxyl-PC quenching is that CBR1 is immersed in the hydrophobic portion of the membrane to a similar depth as CBR3. Although CBR1 in cPLA2-C2 is longer and more hydrophobic than in most C2 domains, other C2 domains also have hydrophobic residues in CBR1, and it may be that membrane penetration by this loop is a general feature of C2 domain-membrane interaction. For cPLA2, it has been recently shown that calcium-dependent membrane penetration plays a critical role in the enzyme activity and greatly contributes to membrane binding and arachidonate specificity of the enzyme (42).

The critical interaction distance between a tryptophan and a membrane-embedded nitroxide spin-labeled phospholipid at which a quenching can be observed has been estimated to be 10-11 Å (31). This enables us to place Phe-49 (at the end of strand beta 2) and Phe-63 (at the beginning of CBR2) outside the hydrophobic core of the lipid bilayer. Consistent with this, there is no calcium-dependent blue shift in the emission maximum upon liposome binding for either of these two mutants. Nevertheless, there is a pronounced change in the intensity of fluorescence for residue 63 upon binding PC vesicles. This could mean that CBR2 is forming interactions with the polar head groups of the membrane or that its environment is changing due to a conformational change in the protein induced by lipid binding. Either of these interpretations would be consistent with the observation that micelle binding by cPLA2-C2 induces NMR chemical shift changes for residues in CBR2 (20) and similar observations for short-chain phosphatidylserine (di-C6-phosphatidylserine) binding to the SytI C2A domain (43).

A model of the cPLA2 C2 domain bound to a lipid membrane is presented in Fig. 8. This model, based on our fluorescence quenching results, requires that Phe-35 in CBR1 and Tyr-96 and Val-97 in CBR3 are immersed to approximately the same depth in the hydrophobic core of the membrane and that Phe-49 and Phe-63 are at a very different level, i.e. outside the hydrophobic region. A further requirement was to place the C2 domain in such a position that the phosphates of the phospholipids could make direct interaction with the exposed coordination sites of the Ca2+ ions in the crevice formed by CBR1 and CBR3. This constraint may be reasonable in light of other protein-phospholipid interactions that have been characterized such as for annexin V, but has no experimental evidence in the context of C2 domains. In the model shown in Fig. 8, residues in CBR2 would lie just at the interface between the solvent and the head group region of the membrane. This arrangement with CBR1 and CBR3 penetrating and CBR2 at the interface is somewhat different than what was proposed by Chae et al. (43) for the SytI C2A domain based on NMR chemical shifts caused by binding to short-chain phosphatidylserine. These workers proposed that a hydrophobic ridge consisting of residues from CBR2 and CBR3 forms the phospholipid-interacting surface of the domain, with CBR1 directed away from the membrane. The apparent lack of involvement of CBR1 in membrane binding by SytI-C2A may mean that cPLA2-C2 and SytI-C2A bind membranes very differently, given that we observe CBR1 to penetrate into the membrane to a similar degree as CBR3, but the difference may also be related to the use of soluble short acyl chain phospholipids for the NMR study. A heteronuclear single quantum correlation NMR study of cPLA2-C2 in the presence and absence of dodecylphosphocholine micelles (20) has shown that residues in all three CBRs undergo the greatest changes in 15N/NH chemical shifts.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Model of the cPLA2 C2 domain bound to a phospholipid membrane. A, shown is the chemical structure of spin-labeled phospholipids used in fluorescence quenching experiments (1-palmitoyl-2-stearoyl-(n-doxyl)-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine) with a doxyl group at position 7 or 12 of the sn-2-acyl chain. Values for the depths of doxyl groups are taken from Ref. 49. B, the crystallographically observed cPLA2 C2 domain structure was placed onto the crystal structure of a dimyristoyl-PC monolayer (one layer from the bilayer crystal structure is shown) (50). The crystal structure of the dimyristoyl-PC has the lipids arranged in two staggered levels. Positions 7 and 12 of the sn-2-acyl chains in each of the two levels are indicated by red and blue arrows. The domain was positioned so that Trp residues at positions 96, 97, and 35 (rendered as green CPK models) would be immersed into the membrane to approximately equal depths and <10 Å from positions 7 and 12 of the sn-2-acyl chains. The domain was also positioned so that residues 49 and 63 (purple CPK models) were farther than 10 Å from position 7 of the sn-2-acyl chains in the lower of the two staggered PC levels. The solvent-exposed areas of the bound Ca2+ ions (cyan) were positioned to form a direct interaction with the phosphate of the phospholipid head group. The figure was prepared with BOBSCRIPT and Raster3D (51).

A feature of the cPLA2 C2 domain that has eluded understanding is its selective translocation to nuclear membranes and the endoplasmic reticulum. This specific translocation results in cPLA2 activity in the vicinity of other enzymes of the eicosanoid pathway and is therefore critical to the role that this enzyme plays in inflammatory responses. Specific translocation may be the consequence of higher local calcium concentration or specific lipid composition at the translocation site, or it may be related to more general features of internal membranes such as membrane fluidity and head group packing. For example, it has been shown that diacylglycerol enhances arachidonic acid release in vivo in a phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-activated signaling pathway (44) and cPLA2 membrane penetration and enzyme activity in vitro (42) in a manner consistent with its ability to increase phospholipid head group spacing. Another source of complexity is related to the ability of calcium to induce rapid transbilayer redistribution of membrane phospholipids (45, 46). Specific interactions between residues in the CBRs and the phospholipid head groups have been proposed to account for the differences in affinities of cPLA2-C2 for various phospholipids, but no experimental evidence has been reported to substantiate these models. The relative importance of specific interactions and more general hydrophobic interactions that could be modulated by changes in membrane structure remains to be demonstrated. Only when the relative importance of these interactions is understood will we begin to have an insight into the molecular basis for targeting of cPLA2 to specific membranes.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Bazbek Davletov for advice on lipid binding assays and Sean Munro and Tim Levine for the GFP cloning vector and helpful discussions.

    Note Added in Proof

Very recently, an in vitro study of location of the membrane-binding surface on the cPLA2 domain, using different methods, was reported (Nalefski, E. A., and Falke, J. J. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 17642-17650).

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by the Arthritis Research Campaign (to R. L. W.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 44-1223-402171; Fax: 44-1223-412178; E-mail: rlw{at}mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: cPLA2, cytosolic phospholipase A2; cPLA2-C2, cytosolic phospholipase A2 C2 domain; SytI, synaptotagmin I; SytI-C2A, synaptotagmin I C2A domain; CBR, calcium-binding region; GFP, green fluorescent protein; FRET, fluorescence resonance energy transfer; dansyl-PE, N-(5-dimethylaminonaphthalene-1-sulfonyl)-1,2-dihexadecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine; PC, phosphatidylcholine; doxyl-PC, 1-palmitoyl-2-stearoyl-(n-doxyl)-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
  1. Sharp, J. D., White, D. L., Chiou, X. G., Goodson, T., Gamboa, G. C., McClure, D., Burgett, S., Hoskins, J., Skatrud, P. L., Kang, L. H., Roberts, E. F., and Kramer, R. M. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 14850-14853[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Clark, J. D., Lin, L.-L., Kriz, R. W., Ramesha, C. S., Sultzman, L. A., Lin, A. Y., Milona, N., and Knopf, J. L. (1991) Cell 65, 1043-1051[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Kramer, R. M. (1994) in Signal-activated Phospholipases (Liscovitch, M., ed), pp. 13-30, R. G. Landes Co.
  4. Kramer, R. M., and Sharp, J. D. (1997) FEBS Lett. 210, 49-53
  5. Leslie, C. C. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 16709-16712[Free Full Text]
  6. Murakami, M., Nakatani, Y., Atsumi, G., Inoue, K., and Kudo, I. (1997) Crit. Rev. Immunol. 17, 225-283[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Lin, L.-L., Lin, A. Y., and Knopf, J. L. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 6147-6151[Abstract]
  8. Hayakawa, M., Ishida, N., Takeuchi, K., Shibamoto, S., Hori, T., Oku, N., Ito, F., and Tsujimoto, M. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 11290-11295[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Uozumi, N., Kume, K., Nagase, T., Nakatani, N., Ishii, S., Tashiro, F., Komagata, Y., Maki, K., Ikuta, K., Ouchi, Y., Miyazaki, J.-I., and Shimizu, T. (1997) Nature 390, 618-622[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Bonventre, J. V., Huang, Z., Taheri, M. R., O'Leary, E., Li, E., Moskowitz, M. A., and Sapirstein, A. (1997) Nature 390, 622-625[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Peters-Golden, M., and McNish, R. W. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 196, 147-153[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Glover, S., Bayburt, T., Jonas, M., Chi, E., and Gelb, M. H. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 15359-15367[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Schievella, A. R., Regier, M. K., Smith, W. L., and Lin, L.-L. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 30749-30754[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Sierra-Honigmann, M. R., Bradley, J. R., and Pober, J. S. (1996) Lab. Invest. 74, 684-695[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Regier, M. K., DeWitt, D. L., Schindler, M. S., and Smith, W. L. (1993) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 301, 439-444[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Qiu, Z.-H., Gijón, M. A., de Carvalho, M. S., Spencer, D. M., and Leslie, C. C. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 8203-8211[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Nalefski, E. A., Sultzman, L. A., Martin, D. M., Kriz, R. W., Towler, P. S., Knopf, J. L., and Clark, J. D. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 18239-18249[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Mosior, M., Six, D. A., and Dennis, E. D. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 2184-2191[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Perisic, O., Fong, S., Lynch, D. E., Bycroft, M., and Williams, R. L. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1596-1604[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Xu, G.-Y., McDonagh, T., Yu, H.-A., Nalefski, E. A., Clark, J. D., and Cumming, D. A. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 280, 485-500[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Sutton, R. B., Davletov, B. A., Berghuis, A. M., Südhof, T. C., and Sprang, S. R. (1995) Cell 80, 929-938[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Essen, L.-O., Perisic, O., Cheung, R., Katan, M., and Williams, R. L. (1996) Nature 380, 595-602[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Pappa, H., Murray-Rast, J., Dekker, L. V., Parker, P. J., and McDonald, N. Q. (1998) Structure 6, 885-894[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Sutton, R. B., and Sprang, S. R. (1998) Structure 6, 1395-1405[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Nalefski, E. A., Slazas, M. M., and Falke, J. J. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 12011-12018[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Levine, T. P., and Munro, S. (1998) Curr. Biol. 8, 729-739[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Siemering, K. R., Golbik, R., Sever, R., and Haseloff, J. (1996) Curr. Biol. 6, 1653-1663[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Davletov, B., Perisic, O., and Williams, R. L. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 19093-19096[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Hixon, M. S., Ball, A., and Gelb, M. H. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 8516-8526[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Chapman, E. R., and Davis, A. F. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 13995-14001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. London, E., and Feigenson, G. W. (1981) Biochemistry 20, 1932-1938[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Irvine, R. (1998) Curr. Biol. 8, R557-R559[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Ponting, C. P., and Parker, P. J. (1996) Protein Sci. 5, 162-166[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Nalefski, E. A., and Falke, J. J. (1996) Protein Sci. 5, 2375-2390[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Sakai, N., Sasaki, K., Ikegaki, N., Shirai, Y., Ono, Y., and Saito, N. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 139, 1465-1476[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Plant, P. J., Yeger, H., Staub, O., Howard, P., and Rotin, D. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 32329-32336[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Leslie, C. C., and Channon, J. Y. (1990) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1045, 261-270[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Nalefski, E. A., McDonagh, T., Somers, W., Seehra, J., Falke, J. J., and Clark, J. D. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1365-1372[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Edwards, A. S., and Newton, A. C. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 15615-15623[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Swairjo, M. A., Concha, N. O., Kaetzel, M. A., Dedman, J. R., and Seaton, B. A. (1995) Nat. Struct. Biol. 2, 968-974[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Medkova, M., and Cho, W. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 17544-17552[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Lichtenbergova, L., Yoon, E. T., and Cho, W. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 14128-14136[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Chae, Y. K., Abildgaard, F., Chapman, E. R., and Markley, J. L. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 25659-25663[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Balboa, M. A., Balsinde, J., and Dennis, E. A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 7684-7690[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Williamson, P., Kulick, A., Zachowski, A., Schlegel, R. A., and Devaux, P. F. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 6355-6360[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Fujimoto, K., Umeda, M., and Fujimoto, T. (1996) J. Cell Sci. 109, 2453-2460[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Essen, L.-O., Perisic, O., Lynch, D. E., Katan, M., and Williams, R. L. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 2753-2762[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Esnouf, R. M. (1997) J. Mol. Graph. 15, 133-138
  49. Qin, Z., and Cafiso, D. S. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 2917-2925[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Pearson, R. H., and Pascher, I. (1979) Nature 281, 499-501[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  51. Merrit, E. A., and Murphy, M. E. P. (1994) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 50, 869-873[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.