Antisense Oligonucleotides Containing Modified Bases Inhibit in Vitro Translation of Leishmania amazonensis mRNAs by Invading the Mini-exon Hairpin*

Daniel CompagnoDagger , Jed N. Lampe§, Chantal BourgetDagger , Igor V. Kutyavin§, Ludmila Yurchenko, Eugeny A. Lukhtanov§, Vladimir V. Gorn§, Howard B. Gamper Jr.§parallel , and Jean-Jacques ToulméDagger **

From Dagger  INSERM Unité 386, IFR Pathologies Infectieuses, Université Victor Segalen, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076 Bordeaux, France, § Epoch Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bothell, Washington 98021, and the  Institute of Biorganic Chemistry, Lavrentiev Prospekt 8, Novosibirsk, Russia

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
REFERENCES

Complementary oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) that contain 2-aminoadenine and 2-thiothymine interact weakly with each other but form stable hybrids with unmodified complements. These selectively binding complementary (SBC) agents can invade duplex DNA and hybridize to each strand (Kutyavin, I. V., Rhinehart, R. L., Lukhtanov, E. A., Gorn, V. V., Meyer, R. B., and Gamper, H. B. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 11170-11176). Antisense ODNs with similar properties should be less encumbered by RNA secondary structure. Here we show that SBC ODNs strand invade a hairpin in the mini-exon RNA of Leishmania amazonensis and that the resulting heteroduplexes are substrates for Escherichia coli RNase H. SBC ODNs either with phosphodiester or phosphorothioate backbones form more stable hybrids with RNA than normal base (NB) ODNs. Optimal binding was observed when the entire hairpin sequence was targeted. Translation of L. amazonensis mRNA in a cell-free extract was more efficiently inhibited by SBC ODNs complementary to the mini-exon hairpin than by the corresponding NB ODNs. Nonspecific protein binding in the cell-free extract by phosphorothioate SBC ODNs rendered them ineffective as antisense agents in vitro. SBC phosphorothioate ODNs displayed a modest but significant improvement of leishmanicidal properties compared with NB phosphorothioate ODNs.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
REFERENCES

Trypanosomatids are attractive targets for the antisense approach, as every mature transcript contains a common species-specific mini-exon sequence spliced onto its 5' end (1, 2). Maturation of mRNAs includes a trans-splicing event, which transfers a 39-nucleotide segment of the mini-exon derived pre-RNA (the medRNA)1 to the 5' end of every message (3). Hybridization of an antisense oligonucleotide (ODN) to this sequence can potentially inhibit translation of all transcripts. Indeed, it was demonstrated that anti-mini-exon oligonucleotides were able to prevent translation of Trypanosoma and Leishmania mRNAs in cell-free extracts (4-6), to kill procyclic forms of T. brucei (7), and to cure L. amazonensis-infected macrophages in vitro (Refs. 8 and 9; see Ref. 2 for a review).

The trypanosomatid medRNA was proposed to adopt a secondary structure based upon conservation of folding pattern for different RNA (10). Recently the Leptomonas collosoma medRNA was shown to switch between two alternate structures (11, 12). One form leads to a base pairing pattern conserved for all of the trypanosome medRNA, suggesting critical functional interactions for splicing (11). In L. amazonensis the mini-exon was shown to fold into a structure that interferes with the hybridization of antisense ODNs (13, 14). RNA intramolecular structures that prevent the formation of oligonucleotide-RNA intermolecular complexes weaken antisense effects. This limitation has prompted the design of oligonucleotides able to overcome the mini-exon structure (for a review, see Ref. 15).

In a recent report, the L. amazonensis mini-exon sequence was efficiently complexed by an ODN capable of folding back on itself to form a triple strand with the putative hairpin element (16). This "double hairpin" complex readily formed at pH 6.0 using a pyrimidine motif for triplexing. However, this oligomer did not show selective inhibitory properties in cell-free translation experiments, probably due to pH conditions that are not appropriate for the formation of a triple helix involving C-G*C+ triplets. Alternatively, the disruption of the secondary structure by oligomers of high affinity can be considered.

We have been investigating selectively binding complementary (SBC) ODNs as an alternative for targeting structured nucleic acids (17, 18). These ODNs are intended to be used as complementary pairs or as a single self-complementary agent. Due to the presence of modified bases, they are unable to form stable hybrids with one another but should hybridize to normal DNA or RNA complements. We have shown that SBC ODNs containing 2-aminoadenine and 2-thiothymine bases can strand invade the end of double-stranded DNA in a process that is favored both kinetically and thermodynamically (17). The A/U-rich hairpin proposed for the L. amazonensis mini-exon sequence presents an ideal target for testing whether SBC ODNs can strand invade an RNA stem loop by hybridizing to every base of the element.

In this study we experimentally confirmed the hairpin structure of the L. amazonensis mini-exon sequence and demonstrated that antisense ODNs with SBC character are more effective than normal base (NB) ODNs in addressing this hairpin. Our results show that SBC ODNs form very stable hybrids with the entire hairpin sequence, and that the heteroduplexes are substrates for Escherichia coli RNase H. We demonstrated that SBC ODN-RNA hybrids inhibit translation of L. amazonensis mRNA in a cell-free extract when RNase H is present. The successful targeting of a simple hairpin by SBC ODNs suggests that other secondary structure features in RNA should also be accessible to these ODNs.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Oligonucleotide Synthesis-- Preparation of protected phosphoramidite precursors of 2-thiothymidine and 2-aminoadenosine and synthesis of SBC ODNs using these reagents have been described (17). NB ODNs with DNA, RNA, or 2'-O-methyl backbones were synthesized by routine procedures using commercially available chemicals. The Beaucage reagent was used to prepare NB and SBC ODNs with a phosphorothioate backbone (19). All antisense ODNs contained a 3'-hexanol end group as a consequence of using a modified hexanol primer controlled pore glass support (20). Capillary gel electrophoresis indicated that the SBC ODNs were at least 85% pure, and hydrolysates of SBC ODNs prepared as described previously (17) gave the expected ratios of nucleosides. Extinction coefficients of ODNs were calculated using a nearest neighbor model (21) and employed values of 9,800 M-1 cm-1 for 2-thiothymidine (22) and 6,800 M-1 cm-1 for 2-aminoadenosine (23) at 260 nm.

RNA Synthesis-- The mini-exon RNA of L. amazonensis was prepared by in vitro transcription of pBluescriptIIKS in which the mini-exon sequence was cloned downstream of the T7 promoter, using Ampliscribe T7 transcription kit (Tebu). In the resulting transcript, the original mini-exon sequence was flanked by sequences derived from the vector, both on the 5' (5'-GGGCGAAUUGGAGCUC) and on the 3' sides (5'-GAUC). The RNA was purified by electrophoresis on a 12% polyacrylamide denaturing gel.

Nuclease Mapping of Mini-exon RNA Secondary Structure-- 5'-End-labeled mini-exon RNA (100 pmol) was incubated for 20 min at 37 °C in the presence of 1 unit of S1 nuclease (Boehringer Mannheim), in a 50 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.5) containing 28 mM NaCl and 4.5 mM ZnSO4. RNases T1 and V1 (Boehringer Mannheim) digestions were performed for 10 and 20 min, respectively, in 20 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.4) containing 140 mM KCl, 20 mM sodium acetate, and 3 mM MgCl2 (S buffer). Cleavage by 15 µM methyl propidium-EDTA-Fe(II) complexes was carried out for 10 min at 37 °C in S buffer. RNase T1 digestion under denaturing conditions was achieved for 10 min at 50 °C in 20 mM sodium acetate and 5 M urea. Digestion products were analyzed by electrophoresis on a 12% polyacrylamide denaturing gel followed by autoradiography.

Determination of Hybrid Melting Temperatures-- Complementary ODNs were diluted in 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.2, 10 mM MgCl2, and 140 mM KCl to give 2 µM of each ODN. Hybridization was assured by rapid heat-cooling of the samples. A260 was recorded as a function of temperature in a Lambda 2 (Perkin-Elmer) spectrophotometer equipped with a PTP-6 automatic multicell temperature programmer. Samples were heated at the rate of 0.5 °C/min. Melting temperatures (Tm values) were determined from the derivative maxima.

Determination of Hybrid Equilibrium Dissociation Constants by Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay-- The mini-exon RNA prepared by in vitro transcription as described above was labeled by incorporating [alpha -32P]ATP (37.5 MBq/mmol). RNA and oligonucleotide were heated separately for 5 min at 65 °C and cooled down on ice. One pmol of RNA was mixed with the desired ODN in 15 µl of 50 mM Tris acetate buffer (pH 7.0) containing 10 mM magnesium acetate. The mixture was incubated for 15 min at 4 °C. The samples were then run in the same Tris buffer at 10 V/cm for about 15 h, on a 15% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel at 4 °C. The activity in the bands corresponding to the free and bound RNA species was evaluated by PhosphorImager analysis or by Cerenkov counting. The dissociation constant was taken as the ODN concentration at which 50% of the target RNA was retarded.

L. amazonensis mRNA Preparation and in Vitro Translation-- Total RNA was isolated from L. amazonensis promastigotes by the guanidine chloride method (6). In vitro translation of this RNA (1 µg) was catalyzed by wheat germ extract (25 µl; Promega) or rabbit reticulocyte lysate (35 µl; Promega) in a total volume of 50 µl. Antisense ODN was added to the RNA on ice, immediately before the initiation of translation, and reactions were conducted for 1 h, at 25 °C (wheat germ extract) or 30 °C (rabbit reticulocyte lysate) in the presence of [35S]methionine (37 TBq/mmol; Amersham). Some incubations were supplemented with 2.5 units of E. coli RNase H (Boehringer Mannheim). Reaction aliquots were analyzed for labeled proteins by precipitation with trichloroacetic acid onto Whatman GF/A glass fiber filters and counting in a liquid scintillation counter. Relative levels of protein synthesis were calculated as described previously (13).

Mapping of RNase H Cleavage Sites-- A synthetic RNA 35-mer was used for RNase H mapping of L. amazonensis mini-exon-ODN complexes. Prior to incubation with RNase H, the oligonucleotide and the RNA were treated as described for electrophoretic mobility shift assay. 5'-End-labeled RNA was then mixed with the desired ODN at a final concentration of 2 and 50 µM, respectively, in a 20 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.8, containing 50 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM dithiothreitol. The mixture was kept at 4 °C for 15 min prior to incubation with 0-4 units of E. coli RNase H (Promega) for 15 min at 4 °C. The reaction was stopped by adding one volume of 8 M urea. Samples were analyzed by electrophoresis on a 20% polyacrylamide gel containing 7 M urea.

In Vitro Treatment of Leishmania-infected Macrophages-- Preparation of macrophages and parasites was carried out as described (8). Leishmania amazonensis (LV79 strain), prepared from infected BALB/c mice, was used to infect adherent macrophages at a multiplicity of 5 parasites/cell, resulting in more than 70% infected cells. This was normalized to 100% for comparison between different experiments. Infected macrophages were incubated at 34 °C with the desired oligonucleotide concentration for 48 h in RPMI/HEPES medium containing 10% fetal calf serum. The cultures were then washed, fixed in methanol, and stained with Giemsa. Cells were observed by microscopy to determine the level of infection. About 500 macrophages were scored for each oligonucleotide concentration; a cell was identified as infected when it contained at least one recognizable parasite.

    RESULTS

The Mini-exon Sequence of L. amazonensis Forms a Hairpin-- The mini-exon region is known to fold into secondary structures (11, 12). We investigated the structure of a 35-nucleotide-long mini-exon sequence in which the four modified nucleotides (24) at the 5' end of the natural sequence were omitted (Figs. 1 and 2). Indirect evidence favors the existence of a stable structure in the mini-exon sequence of L. amazonensis. Anomalous electrophoretic mobility of this oligomer as well as low binding efficiency of complementary oligonucleotides have been observed previously (6, 13). Prior to initiating the targeting of this structure with NB and SBC ODNs, we confirmed its existence by footprinting. The cleavage pattern obtained with nuclease S1, RNases T1 and V1, and methylpropidium-EDTA (MPE) led to the secondary structure shown in Fig. 1. Positions 23-26, which are cleaved by S1 nuclease (lane 4), correspond to the apical loop of the imperfect hairpin. Whereas G23 was a cleavage site for RNase T1, no band corresponding to G17 and G29 was observed suggesting a structured region. This was further confirmed by RNase V1 and MPE, which preferentially cleave double-stranded structures. The reduced cleavage observed with RNase V1 compared with MPE in the upper part of the stem might be related to the bulged U20. The double-stranded stem likely extends to the U35-U37/A13-A11 region as indicated both by RNase V1 and MPE sensitivity, whereas both G8 and G39,G40 have a clear single-strandedness character. The structure of the upper part of the stem is in fair agreement with previous models (11); the differences at the bottom of the stem region are related to the different sequences used.


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Secondary structure of L. amazonensis mini-exon RNA. A, mapping of mini-exon RNA incubated with: RNase T1 under denaturing (lane 1) or nondenaturing conditions (lane 2), nuclease S1 (lane 4), RNase V1 (lane 5), or MPE (lane 6). The alkaline digestion of the mini-exon RNA is in lane 4. The G residues are identified to the left. B, the mini-exon hairpin structure deduced from nuclease mapping. The italicized bases correspond to regions of the plasmid used to generate the mini-exon by in vitro transcription. The mini-exon sequence is numbered with respect to the natural sequence, even though the first four modified nucleotides have been omitted in this construct.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Antisense ODNs used to target the mini-exon sequence of L. amazonensis. The mini-exon sequence, with paired bases underlined, is at the top (39). Four antisense ODNs 15Le-I, 15Le-II, 25Le, and 16Le are aligned below together with DNA (DNA-I/II) and RNA (RNA-I/II) complements to 15Le-I and 15Le-II. 15Le-I, 15Le-II, and 25Le were synthesized with PO and PS backbones and contained adenine and thymine bases (NB) or 2-aminoadenine and 2-thiothymine bases (SBC). 15Le-I and 15Le-II were also synthesized with a 2'-O-methyl backbone and contained uracil in place of thymine. 16Le has been previously used to target the mini-exon sequence (8) and contained a NB sequence and either a PO or PS backbone. The 3'-hexanol group present on every antisense ODN except 16Le is not shown.

Model System for Evaluating SBC Antisense ODNs-- The mini-exon sequence of L. amazonensis is an attractive target for evaluating SBC ODNs as antisense agents. The high A/U content (77%) of the hairpin and its flanking arms should favor the use of SBC ODNs that contain 2-aminoadenine and 2-thiothymine bases in place of adenine and thymine. These base analogs cannot hydrogen-bond to one another, due to steric clash, but can form good pairs with complementary unmodified bases (17). As a consequence, an SBC ODN complementary to the hairpin element of the mini-exon should be single-stranded and yet capable of strand invading the stem-loop structure. In this case the upper 8-base pair stem of the hairpin would be replaced by 20 base pairs formed between the ODN and the RNA. Moreover, 9 of these new base pairs would be highly stable 2-aminoadenine-uracil doublets with three hydrogen bonds (25). To promote annealing, both NB and SBC ODNs were synthesized as 25-mers (25Le; see Fig. 2) with the 5 extra bases complementary to the 5' arm at the base of the hairpin. SBC ODN pairs were also compared with NB ODN pairs as agents to target the mini-exon hairpin. These 15-mer ODNs were complementary to the 5' or 3' half of the hairpin (15Le-I or 15Le-II; see Fig. 2). Annealing was again promoted by making a 5-base-long segment of each ODN complementary to one of the overhangs at the base of the hairpin. Hybridization of both ODNs to the hairpin generated a 30-base pair DNA-RNA hybrid with a nick separating the ODNs. By employing two paired ODNs instead of a single self-complementary ODN, the likelihood of mutual interaction between the NB ODNs was significantly reduced and the potential advantage of the SBC pair accordingly diminished.

NB and SBC versions of 25Le or 15Le-I + 15Le-II were synthesized with phosphodiester (PO) or phosphorothioate (PS) backbones. Properties of these ODNs were compared relative to 16Le, a NB 16-mer (Fig. 2) used in a previous study (8).

Thermostability of Hybrids Formed by NB and SBC ODNs-- Since the entire sequence of a stable hairpin was being targeted, the various antisense ODNs were prone to hairpin formation as well. Self-association of these ODNs was examined by UV-absorption thermal denaturation. While none of the SBC ODNs gave a melting transition, PO and PS versions of NB 25Le gave melting temperatures (Tm) of 46 and 31 °C, respectively (Table I). The NB combination of 15Le-I + 15Le-II formed a very weak hybrid when both ODNs had a PO backbone (Tm = 13 °C) and no hybrid at all when they possessed a PS backbone. The results obtained with antisense sequences are in fair agreement with the expected pairing properties of the ODNs; NB-containing oligomers give rise to more stable antisense structures than SBC ODNs and are therefore less likely to hybridize with the target sense sequence.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Stability of hybrids formed by antisense Le ODNs with each other and with complementary DNA or RNA targets

Absorption thermal denaturation was also used to compare the relative stabilities of hybrids formed by 15Le-I or 15Le-II with complementary DNA or RNA oligomers. Our results show that SBC ODNs with PO or PS backbones form more stable hybrids with DNA and RNA than the analogous NB ODNs (Table I). While the enhanced stability of SBC ODN-DNA hybrids (Delta Tm = 11-14 °C) is probably attributable to the additional hydrogen bond present in 2-aminoadenine/thymine base pairs, the even greater stability of SBC ODN-RNA hybrids (Delta Tm = 21-28 °C) requires further explanation. One possibility is that SBC ODNs favor the formation of an A-motif duplex with RNA. Indeed, the SBC/PO 15Le-II hybrid with RNA-II is similar in stability to the hybrid formed using an ODN with a 2'-O-methyl backbone, a combination that favors an A-type duplex (Table I).

Binding of NB and SBC ODNs to the Mini-exon Hairpin-- Electrophoretic mobility shift analysis was used to compare hybridization of NB and SBC ODNs to the RNA mini-exon hairpin. Fig. 3 shows representative autoradiographs from which Kd values were extracted (Table II). NB 15Le-I and NB 15Le-II were poor binding agents, with the PS analogs worse than the PO analogs. Dissociation constants for 15Le-II were in the high micromolar range: 20 and 150 µM for NB/PO and NB/PS analogs, respectively. SBC versions of the same ODNs were much more effective binding agents. For example, the Kd values of hybrids formed by PO or PS versions of SBC 15Le-II were about 50- or 200-fold smaller than the Kd values of the corresponding complexes formed by NB 15Le-II ODNs. This agrees fairly well with the Tm values obtained with complementary RNA (see above); SBC ODNs were better able to open the hairpin structure of the mini-exon. For comparison we evaluated the binding of a standard 16-mer used in a previous study (8); the PO and PS 16Le were characterized by Kd of 0.7 and 5 µM, respectively.


View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Electrophoretic mobility shift assays for the interaction of antisense ODNs with the mini-exon RNA of L. amazonensis. Autoradiographs of the polyacrylamide gels obtained for the complexes between L. amazonensis mini-exon RNA and the SBC versions of 25Le. The oligonucleotide concentration is indicated at the bottom of each lane.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Equilibrium dissociation constants for the binding of NB and SBC antisense ODNs to the mini-exon RNA of L. amazonensis

Binding of both 15Le-I and 15Le-II to RNA created a duplex twice as long as that formed by either ODN alone. The two SBC ODN-RNA hybrids had Kd values of about 5 × 10-7 M, while the NB ODN-RNA hybrids had Kd values at least 10-fold higher. This is probably related both to the increased affinity of the SBC oligomers for RNA and to the reduced ability of SBC 15-mers to pair with each other, in comparison to NB ODNs. The partially self-complementary 25Le ODNs provided an opportunity to compare the binding efficiencies of single-stranded SBC ODNs to that of structured NB ODNs. In each instance, the SBC ODN was the most effective binding agent (about 70-fold reduction in Kd). Hybrids that contained an SBC 25Le ODN were as stable as hybrids that contained paired SBC 15Le ODNs, indicating a minor contribution of duplex length (25 versus 30 base pairs) and molecularity of the hybridization reaction (bimolecular versus trimolecular).

Effects of NB and SBC Antisense ODNs on in Vitro Translation in Cell-free Extracts-- The NB and SBC ODNs with a PO backbone were tested for antisense activity against total mRNA from L. amazonensis in a cell-free translation system catalyzed by wheat germ extract. In this model system, SBC 25Le was the most effective antisense agent (Fig. 4). It elicited half-maximal inhibition at 0.08 µM (the C1/2 value). These parameters compare favorably to those of reference ODN 16Le (which has a PO backbone and contains NB bases), which has a C1/2 of about 1 µM. In repeated tests, NB 25Le failed to significantly inhibit translation (Fig. 4D). The dramatic difference in functionality between the SBC and NB versions of 25Le reflects the physical binding properties of these two ODNs (Table II). The paired 15Le-I + 15Le-II ODNs were also effective antisense agents, and here again the SBC pair was more potent than the NB pair. C1/2 of 0.5 µM was determined for the SBC ODN pair. When each 15-mer was tested alone for antisense activity, potency was reduced and no advantage of SBC over NB ODNs was detected. None of the anti-mini-exon ODNs interfered with translation of brome mosaic virus RNA (<5% inhibition at 0.5 µM ODN). Conversely, inverted antisense ODNs (both NB and SBC) did not inhibit translation of L. amazonensis RNA (<5% inhibition at 1 µM ODN).


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Effect of NB and SBC antisense ODNs on in vitro translation of L. amazonensis mRNA catalyzed by wheat germ extract (A-E) or rabbit reticulocyte lysate (F). NB () and SBC () versions of the following phosphodiester ODNs were compared for antisense activity: panel A, 15Le-I; panel B, 15Le-II; panel C, 15Le-I + 15Le-II; panel D, 25Le. Panel E shows the antisense activity of the reference ODN 16Le (NB/PO). Panel F shows the activity of 25Le (SBC/PO) when using rabbit reticulocyte lysate in the absence () or presence () of E. coli RNase H.

Phosphorothioate NB and SBC antisense ODNs did not inhibit translation at concentrations below 0.5 µM (data not shown). Adsorption of these ODNs by proteins in the extract may explain why they failed to elicit an antisense effect. Following incubation with wheat germ extract, the PO SBC 25Le ODN ran identically to an untreated control on a nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel while the PS ODN ran as a slow moving smear attributable to the association with proteins from the extract (data not shown). Such binding has been reported by others for NB ODNs with a PS backbone (26). Moreover, upon binding to RNA, these PS sequences formed poorer substrates for RNase H than PO counterparts (see below).

SBC-RNA Duplexes Are Substrates for RNase H-- Two different mechanisms account for the inhibition of translation by antisense ODNs: RNase H-independent (translation arrest) and RNase H-dependent cleavage of target RNA (27, 28). To investigate the mechanism by which SBC ODNs inhibit L. amazonensis on RNA translation, we carried out translation in rabbit reticulocyte lysate, which has a low (if any) class I RNase H activity under translation conditions (29). In Fig. 4F the effect of SBC 25Le (with a PO backbone) on translation was monitored both in the presence and absence of added E. coli RNase H. The results show that inhibition of protein synthesis in this medium occurs via an RNase H-dependent pathway.

To confirm that SBC ODNs form substrates for RNase H upon binding to a complementary RNA, we incubated end-labeled mini-exon RNA with all four versions of 15Le-I, 15Le-II, and 25Le in the presence of E. coli RNase H. The results obtained with 15Le-I and 25Le are presented in Fig. 5. ODN versions sensitized the mini-exon to hydrolysis to various extents. The amplitude of cleavage roughly paralleled the affinity of ODNs for the mini-exon sequence as determined by electrophoretic mobility shift assay, suggesting that the RNase H activity was first driven by the ability of oligonucleotides to invade the mini-exon hairpin. The NB-PS and NB-PO analogs of 15Le-I, which are very poor binders as shown both by gel electrophoresis and Tm measurements, did not induce significant cleavage of the mini-exon RNA by E. coli RNase H. In contrast, the most effective cleavage was obtained when using SBC/PO 25Le, which was also the strongest binder and a good translation inhibitor. However, PS oligonucleotides formed poorer substrates than PO ones. This is unlikely to be due to the presence of SBC bases, as SBC/PO oligonucleotides are excellent elicitors of RNase H activity.


View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Susceptibility of NB and SBC antisense ODN-RNA duplexes to E. coli RNase H. The indicated versions of 15Le-I and 25Le (top of the autoradiograph) were hybridized to 5'-end-labeled L. amazonensis mini-exon RNA and then treated with E. coli RNase H as indicated under "Experimental Procedures." Reaction aliquots were analyzed by denaturing PAGE. In the control lane (C), the RNA was incubated in the absence of any complementary ODN. In lane M, the RNA was partially hydrolyzed by alkali treatment. The mini-exon sequence is indicated to the left.

Interestingly, different patterns of RNase H cleavage were obtained, depending on the chemical nature of the bases of the antisense oligos; similar profiles were obtained for NB oligomers on the one hand and SBC oligomers on the other hand, independent of the backbone. For instance, whereas NB/PO 25Le generated cleavage at A22, the SBC ODNs did not induce cleavage at this position. In contrast, strong sites corresponding to U24 and U25 were observed with SBC 25-mers. Other differences were also seen at the 3' end of the RNA (compare cleavage at U28 and G29). Significant differences were also seen with the ODN 15Le-I; the digestion profile obtained with either the SBC/PO or the SBC/PS derivatives differed markedly from the one with the NB/PO version.

In Vitro Effects of SBC Anti-mini-exon Oligonucleotides on Cultured Parasites-- As the presence of nucleases in the growth medium prevented us from using PO oligomers, investigations on cultured parasites were restricted to phosphorothioate derivatives. The addition of phosphorothioate anti-mini-exon oligonucleotides to the culture, either with NB or SBC character, led to the typical morphological changes previously described for 16Le (8). Oligonucleotide-treated cultures contained numerous macrophages with fragmented vacuoles devoid of any parasite (data not shown). At any tested concentration (5, 10, or 30 µM), the two NB ODNs 16Le and 15Le-I behaved similarly, curing from 10 to 30% macrophages (Fig. 6). The use of an SBC analog (15Le-I) showed some limited increased efficiency over the NB ODN. Therefore, the effect observed on cultured cells did not reflect the binding properties of the SBC and NB 15 mers (Table II). However, the full advantage of SBC sequences was expected only when both sides of the structure are targeted. Indeed, whereas the combination NB 15Le-I + NB 15Le-II did not improve the leishmanicidal efficacy, compared with the effect of a single sequence, the simultaneous addition of the two SBC 15-mers resulted in an improved leishmanicidal effect better seen at low concentration; 18 and 32% of cured macrophages were observed after incubation of infected cells with 5 µM mixture of the NB and SBC 15-mers, respectively (Fig. 6). This effect was selective as NB and SBC control phosphorothioate oligonucleotides induced a much lower effect (about 5% at 5 µM) in agreement with our previous study (8).


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Effect of phosphorothioate oligonucleotides on L. amazonensis-infected macrophages. Murine peritoneal macrophages were infected and treated as described under "Experimental Procedures," by 5, 10, or 30 µM oligonucleotides, with either NB or SBC bases, as indicated to the right of the figure. Control sequences were included: NB/16Le inv, the inverted sequence of 16Le; SBC/15Le-I inv, the inverted sequence of 15Le-I. The results are the average of three completely independent experiments. For the 15Le-I + 15Le-II pair, the total concentration is indicated, each oligomer accounting for 50%.


    DISCUSSION

We have compared the binding and antisense activities of single and paired ODNs with NB and SBC character. Not surprisingly, as reported previously, antisense potency seemed to parallel hybrid stability (13, 30). SBC ODNs were superior to NB ODNs, and ODN pairs were more efficient than single ODNs. A key attribute of antisense SBC pairs is their enhanced ability to invade double-stranded nucleic acids due to their reduced propensity to hybridize with each other. We had previously postulated that the inhibitory influence of RNA secondary structure on the binding of antisense ODNs might be overcome through the use of perfectly paired SBC complements (17, 18). In this respect, the targeting of an RNA hairpin, like that formed by the mini-exon sequence of L. amazonensis, is a specialized application of SBC analogs permitting the use of a partially self-complementary ODN. Here we have shown that such an ODN (SBC 25Le) is an efficient inhibitor of in vitro translation, whereas the same ODN with unmodified bases (NB 25Le) is without activity. We presume that stable hairpin formation by the NB ODN prevents it from interacting with the mini-exon.

SBC ODNs with 2-aminoadenine and 2-thiothymine bases might favor the formation of A-type double helices upon binding to RNA, leading to very stable hybrids. Each of the modified bases used here projects a bulky group into the minor groove of the duplex. The wider minor groove of the A-form duplex should better accommodate these groups. Previous studies of ODNs that contain 2-aminoadenine or 2-thiothymine indicate a propensity to form A-type duplexes (23, 31, 32). The SBC ODNs used here have a high proportion of both modified bases and most likely share this tendency.

The retention of RNase H susceptibility by SBC ODN-RNA hybrids implies that the presence of the bulky groups in the minor groove does not prevent recognition of the duplex as a substrate by RNase H. This property of SBC oligos is unusual since other ODNs that form A-type hybrids with RNA, such as ODNs with 2'-O-alkyl or phosphoramidate backbones, do not allow RNase H activity (33, 34). The ability of NB and SBC ODNs with a PS backbone to support RNase H activity is consistent with the hypothesis that the presence of a beta -anomeric deoxyribose as part of a negatively charged backbone allows the complementary RNA strand to be cleaved. However, the different cleavage patterns observed suggest that RNase H is able to sense the minor conformation changes induced by the presence of the modified bases.

Phosphorothioate ODNs were shown to exhibit L. amazonensis killing activity in murine macrophages infected with an amastigote inoculum. The results obtained here with NB/16Le phosphorothioate are in good agreement with a previous study (8). The SBC ODNs exhibited a limited increased leishmanicidal activity compared with regular phosphorothioate ODNs. However, it should be noted that the maximal expected leishmanicidal effect was reached at a low concentration of the paired SBC 15-mers (15Le-I + 15Le-II): 30% cured macrophages were observed at 5 µM mixture (i.e. 2.5 µM amounts of each oligomer). One cannot exclude the possibility that in live parasites the mini-exon sequence on the mature RNA does not fold into the hairpin. Sequestration of these PS ODNs by cellular proteins might also have partly negated the benefit of their increased affinity for the target (26). The additional thio groups contributed by 2-thiothymine bases in PS SBC ODNs may enhance adsorption onto proteins.

Like the mini-exon sequence, numerous sequences in many transcripts are not freely accessible to complementary antisense ODNs due to their participation in secondary or tertiary structures (35-37). Efforts to overcome secondary structure by designing ODNs with greater binding affinity or by utilizing hybridization strategies that accommodate pre-existing RNA structure have not been entirely successful (for recent overviews, see Refs. 15, 17, and 38). The unequivocal advantage of SBC 25Le argues the merit of testing whether paired sense-antisense SBC ODNs show a similar advantage in targeting random mRNA sequences; by co-administering a single-stranded antisense ODN and its complement, with SBC character, any secondary structure involving the site of interest could be disrupted by concurrent binding of both single-stranded SBC ODNs to the RNA sequences involved in base pairing.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We are grateful to D. Adams for assistance in preparing the phosphoramidites.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by the "Pôle Médicament Aquitaine" and the "Direction des Recherches, des Etudes et des Techniques" (to J. J. T.) and by National Institutes of Health Grant GM 54443 (to H. B. G.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

parallel Current address: Kimeragen Inc., 300 Pheasant Run, Newtown, PA 18940.

** To whom correspondence should be addressed: INSERM U. 386, Université Victor Segalen, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076 Bordeaux, France. Tel.: 33-0-5-57-57-10-14; Fax: 33-0-5-57-57-10-15; E-mail: jean-jacques.toulme{at}bordeaux.inserm.fr.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: medRNA, mini-exon derived pre-RNA; ODN, oligodeoxynucleotide; SBC, selectively binding complementary; NB, normal base; MPE, methylpropidium-EDTA; PO, phosphodiester; PS, phosphorothioate.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
REFERENCES
  1. Toulmé, J. J. (1992) in Antisense RNA and DNA (Murray, J. A. H., ed), pp. 175-194, Wiley Inc., New York
  2. Toulmé, J. J., Bourget, C., Compagno, D., and Yurchenko, L. (1997) Parasitology 114, S45-S59[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Borst, P. (1986) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 55, 701-732[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Cornelissen, A. W. C. A., Verspieren, P., Toulmé, J. J., Swinkels, B. W., and Borst, P. (1986) Nucleic Acids Res. 14, 5605-5614[Abstract]
  5. Walder, J. A., Eder, P. S., Engman, D. M., Brentano, S. T., Walder, R. Y., Knutzon, D. S., Dorfman, D. M., and Donelson, J. E. (1986) Science 233, 569-571[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Pascolo, E., Blonski, C., Shire, D., and Toulmé, J.-J. (1993) Biochimie 75, 43-47[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Verspieren, P., Cornelissen, A. W. C. A., Thuong, N. T., Hélène, C., and Toulmé, J. J. (1987) Gene (Amst.) 61, 307-315[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Ramazeilles, C., Mishra, R. K., Moreau, S., Pascolo, E., and Toulmé, J. J. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 7859-7863[Abstract]
  9. Mishra, R. K., Moreau, C., Ramazeilles, C., Moreau, S., Bonnet, J., and Toulmé, J. J. (1995) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1264, 229-237[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Bruzik, J. P., Van Doren, K., Hirsh, D., and Steitz, J. A. (1988) Nature 335, 559-562[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Lecuyer, K., and Crothers, D. M. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 5301-5311[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Harris, K. A., Crothers, D. M., and Ullu, E. (1995) RNA 1, 351-362[Abstract]
  13. Verspieren, P., Loreau, N., Thuong, N. T., Shire, D., and Toulmé, J. J. (1990) Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 4711-4717[Abstract]
  14. Pascolo, E., Hudrisier, D., Sproat, B., Thuong, N. T., and Toulmé, J.-J. (1994) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1219, 98-106[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Toulmé, J. J., Le Tinévez, R., and Brossalina, E. (1996) Biochimie 78, 663-673[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Pascolo, E., and Toulmé, J.-J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 24187-24192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Kutyavin, I. V., Rhinehart, R. L., Lukhtanov, E. A., Gorn, V. V., Meyer, R. B., and Gamper, H. B. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 11170-11176[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Woo, J., Meyer, R., and Gamper, H. B. (1996) Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 2470-2475[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Iyer, P. I., Lawrence, R. P., Egan, W., Regan, J. B., and Beaucage, S. L. (1990) J. Org. Chem. 55, 4693-4698
  20. Gamper, H. B., Reed, M. W., Cox, T., Virosco, J. S., Adams, A. D., Gall, A. A., Scholler, J. K., and Meyer, R. B., Jr. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 145-150[Abstract]
  21. Cantor, C., Warshaw, M. M., and Shapiro, H. (1970) Biopolymers 9, 1059-1077[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Cheong, C., Tinoco, I., and Chollet, A. (1988) Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 5115-5122[Abstract]
  23. Connolly, B. A., and Newman, P. C. (1989) Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 4957-4974[Abstract]
  24. Bangs, J. D., Crain, P. F., Hashizume, T., McCloskey, J. A., and Boothroyd, J. C. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 9805-9815[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Howard, F. B., and Miles, H. T. (1984) Biochemistry 23, 6723-6732[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Brown, D. A., Kang, S. H., Gryaznov, S. M., De Dionisio, L., Heidenreich, O., Sullivan, S., Xu, X., and Nerenberg, M. I. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 26801-26805[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Cazenave, C., Loreau, N., Thuong, N. T., Toulmé, J. J., and Hélène, C. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 4717-4736[Abstract]
  28. Boiziau, C., Kurfurst, R., Cazenave, C., Roig, V., Thuong, N. T., and Toulmé, J. J. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 1113-1119[Abstract]
  29. Cazenave, C., Frank, P., and Büsen, W. (1993) Biochimie 75, 113-122[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Monia, B. P., Lesnik, E. A., Gonzalez, C., Lima, W. F., Mcgee, D., Guinosso, C. J., Kawasaki, A. M., Cook, P. D., and Freier, S. M. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 14514-14522[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Newman, P. C., Nwosu, V. U., Williams, D. M., Cosstick, R., Seela, F., and Connolly, B. A. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 9891-9901[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Garriga, P., Garcia-Quintana, D., Sagi, J., and Manyosa, J. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 1067-1071[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Inoue, H., Hayase, Y., Iwai, S., and Ohtsuka, E. (1987) FEBS Lett. 215, 327-330[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. DeDionisio, L., and Gryaznov, S. M. (1995) J. Chromatogr. B 669, 125-131[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Chastain, M., and Tinoco, I., Jr. (1993) in Antisense Research and Applications (Crooke, S. T., and Lebleu, B., eds), pp. 55-66, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
  36. Laptev, A. V., Lu, Z. C., Colige, A., and Prockop, D. J. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 11033-11039[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Uhlenbeck, O. C. (1995) RNA 1, 4-6[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Ecker, D. J. (1993) in Antisense Research and Applications (Lebleu, B., and Crooke, S. T., eds), pp. 387-399, CRC, Boca Raton, FL
  39. Miller, S. I., Landfear, S. M., and Wirth, D. F. (1986) Nucleic Acids Res. 14, 7341-7360[Abstract]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.



This Article
Abstract
Full Text (PDF)
Purchase Article
View Shopping Cart
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Citation Map
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Copyright Permissions
Google Scholar
Articles by Compagno, D.
Articles by Toulmé, J.-J.
Articles citing this Article
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Compagno, D.
Articles by Toulmé, J.-J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.