Characterization of the Transcriptional Activator CBF1 from Arabidopsis thaliana
EVIDENCE FOR COLD DENATURATION IN REGIONS OUTSIDE OF THE DNA BINDING DOMAIN*

Eiko KanayaDagger §, Noboru NakajimaDagger , Kosuke MorikawaDagger , Kiyotaka Okada, and Yoshiro ShimuraDagger

From the Dagger  Biomolecular Engineering Research Institute, 6-2-3, Furuedai, Suita, Osaka 565-0874, Japan and the  Department of Botany, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

A transcriptional activator, CBF1, from Arabidopsis thaliana, which has the AP2 domain for DNA binding and regulates the cold acclimation response, was overexpressed in Escherichia coli, purified, and characterized. Analyses of the interaction between CBF1 and the C-repeat/dehydration-responsive element by fluorescence measurement showed that CBF1 binds to C-repeat/dehydration-responsive element as a monomer irrespective of the temperature. CD spectra of the intact and truncated CBF1 proteins (1-213, 41-213, 41-157, and 41-146) were measured to examine the temperature-dependent changes of the secondary structure of CBF1. The results suggested that the CBF1 protein has regions exhibiting reversible cold denaturation in the range between 30 and -5 °C and also has a region exhibiting thermal denaturation between 40 and 60 °C. This cold denaturation occurred in both the N-terminal and acidic regions. The thermal denaturation occurred in the region encompassing the AP2 domain. The difference between the retention time of CBF1 at 4 °C and that at 25 °C in gel filtration, and the decrease of the sedimentation coefficient, s20,w, caused by the temperature change from 25 to 3 °C, strongly suggested that the cold denaturation was accompanied by the extension of the molecule. The possible cold denaturation observed here might be a physiologically important structural response of CBF1 to cold stress.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Plants are exposed to various environmental stresses, such as low or high temperatures, dehydration, high salt, infection, injuries, etc. Many protective mechanisms have been evolved by plant cells to overcome the stress. Two major pathways have been suggested in the dehydration and low temperature-responsive processes (1). One is an abscisic acid (ABA)1-dependent pathway, which involves an ABA-responsive element (2-4) and an ABA-responsive element-binding protein with a bZIP motif (5), and the other is an ABA-independent pathway (6-8). The C-repeat/dehydration-responsive element (CRT/DRE) (9-11) and CRT/DRE-binding factor 1 (CBF1) (12) are thought to be important elements in the ABA-independent pathway. CRT has a 5-base pair core sequence of CCGAC and is present in the promoters of several cold-regulated plant genes, including COR15a (10) and COR78/RD29A (9) from Arabidopsis and BN115 from Brassica napas (11). DRE consists of the sequence TACCGACCT in the RD29A promoter (9). Yamaguchi-Shinozaki and Shinozaki (9) showed that CRT/DRE was not responsive to the ABA level. Stockinger et al. (12) isolated an Arabidopsis thaliana cDNA encoding CBF1 by using the yeast one-hybrid method. Jaglo-Ottosen et al. (13) reported that overexpression of CBF1 in Arabidopsis induced cold-regulated (COR) gene expression and increased the freezing tolerance of the Arabidopsis plant. Recently, it has been reported that CBF1 belongs to a small family, which includes CBF2 and CBF3 (14, 15).

The CBF1 protein sequence deduced from the DNA sequence of CBF1 is composed of 213 amino acids, and can be divided into four regions (12), the N-terminal region (amino acid residues 1-32), the potential nuclear localization signal (33-44), the AP2 domain (48-106), and the acidic region (107-213), as shown in Fig. 1a. The AP2 domain, composed of about 60 amino acid residues, is a DNA-binding motif that has been found only in plant proteins thus far (16). Ohme-Takagi and Shinshi (17) reported that the AP2 domain bound to the cis-acting ethylene-responsive element designated the GCC-repeat. The AP2 domain is present in the APETALA2 (18), AINTEGUMENTA (19, 20), TINY (21), and AtEBP (22) proteins and in the RAP2 family of proteins (23) of Arabidopsis, ethylene-responsive element-binding proteins of tobacco (17), and the Glossy15 product of maize (24). The highly conserved core region capable of forming an amphipathic alpha -helix is present in the latter half of the AP2 domain.

Stockinger et al. (12) concluded that CBF1 is a transcriptional activator, based on yeast transformation experiments. The acidic region of CBF1 is thought to play the leading role in transcriptional activation. Acidic activation domains are present, for example, in the yeast transcription factors GAL4 (25) and GCN4 (26), the herpes simplex virus-1 VP16 protein (27-29), the human p53 tumor suppresser gene product (30), and the RelA(p65) subunit of the cellular transcription factor NF-kappa B (31, 32). It has been reported that acid activation domains interact with the general transcription factor TFIIB (33, 34), TFIID (35), the TATA box-binding protein (30), and the transcriptional adaptor ADA2 (36). These results led us to expect that the acidic region of CBF1 might also directly or indirectly interact with general transcription factor(s).

In this study, we report the characterization of the CBF1 protein purified from Escherichia coli transformants. Our purpose was to examine whether various responses of the CBF1 protein occurred when the temperature was lowered from normal to low, nonfreezing temperatures. CD spectra of the intact and truncated CBF1 proteins measured at various temperatures suggested that cold denaturation (37, 38) locally occurred in the CBF1 protein in aqueous solution without denaturant and that thermal denaturation occurred in the AP2 domain. This local cold denaturation is thought to be a characteristic property of the CBF1 protein. We discuss the possible role of this local cold denaturation of CBF1 in the cold acclimation response.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cells and Plasmids-- Plasmids pET28a and pET29b, and E. coli BL21(DE3) were from Novagen, Inc. Competent cells of E. coli JM109 (recA1, endA1, gyra96, thi-1, hsdR17, supE44, relA1, Delta (lac-proAB)/F[traD36, proAB+, lacIq, lacZDelta M15]) for plasmid construction were from Takara Shuzo Co., Ltd. Cells were grown in Luria-Bertani medium (39) containing 50 mg/liter kanamycin.

Materials-- Restriction and DNA-modifying enzymes were from Takara Shuzo Co., Ltd. The DNA ligation kit (ligation high) and KOD DNA polymerase for the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were from Toyobo Co., Ltd. Lysyl endopeptidase (LEP), isopropyl-beta -D-thio-galactopyranoside (IPTG), and guanidine hydrochloride (GdnHCl) were from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. Thrombin was from Sigma. The proteins used as standards for gel filtration were from Bio-Rad. DNA oligomers were synthesized by Sawady Technology Co., Ltd. Other chemicals were of reagent grade.

Construction of the Expression Vector-- The CBF1 gene was cloned from an A. thaliana cDNA library by PCR using the synthetic DNA oligomers 5'-GTACTCTGACATATGAACTCATTTTCAGC-3', 5'-GAGGATCCAATATTAGTAACTCCAAAGCGACACG-3', and 5'-TCGGATCCTCGAGGTAACTCCAAAGCGACACG-3' as primers. Recognition sites of restriction endonucleases NdeI, BamHI, and XhoI are shown by the three underlined areas, respectively. The sequences downstream of the NdeI, BamHI, and XhoI sites of the primers are complementary to the 5'- and 3'-sequences of CBF1, respectively. Thirty cycles of PCR were performed using a Trio-Thermoblock (Biometra) apparatus with KOD DNA polymerase using the procedures recommended by the supplier. The DNA product was digested with NdeI and BamHI or with NdeI and XhoI and ligated to the large NdeI-BamHI fragment of plasmid pET28a or to the large NdeI-XhoI fragment of pET29b to generate plasmid pETCBF1(a or b), in which the CBF1 gene, encoding the CBF1 protein, is under the control of bacteriophage T7 transcription and translation signals. The sequence of the CBF1 gene in pETCBF1 was confirmed by cycle sequencing using ABI PRISMTM dye terminator cycle sequencing ready reaction kits and ABI PRISMTM 310 genetic analyzer from Perkin-Elmer. Truncation of the CBF1 gene was performed via PCR with the synthetic DNA oligomers as primers and using KOD DNA polymerase, according the procedures recommended by the supplier. The nucleotide sequences of the truncated CBF1 genes were confirmed as described above.

Overproduction of the CBF1 Protein-- Expression of the CBF1 protein was induced in E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells harboring plasmid pETCBF1 by the addition of IPTG. Cultivation of the E. coli transformants was carried out at 30 °C. When the absorbance of the culture at 600 nm reached 0.8, 1 mM IPTG was added to the culture medium on ice, and cultivation was then continued for an additional 5 h at 25 °C. Cells were harvested by centrifugation and subjected to the purification procedures described below. The production of the CBF1 protein in cells was examined by analyzing the whole-cell extract by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (40). The solubility of CBF1 in cells was examined as follows: cells were suspended in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, and 1 mM EDTA, sonicated for 2 min on ice, and centrifuged at 15,000 rpm (27,000 × g) for 20 min. The resulting supernatants and pellets were analyzed by SDS-PAGE .

Purification-- All purification procedures were carried out at 4 °C. Cells from a 250-ml culture were suspended in 25 ml of 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM beta -mercaptoethanol, sonicated on ice for 2 min, and centrifuged at 15,000 rpm (27,000 × g) for 30 min. EDTA (1 mM) was present in the suspension to prevent the digestion of the CBF1 protein by proteases in E. coli. The resulting supernatant was supplemented with 10 mM imidazole and then applied to a HiTrap chelating column with Ni2+ ions from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. After the column was washed, the CBF1 protein was eluted with a solution containing 300 mM imidazole, 0.5 M NaCl, 20 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, and 5 mM beta -mercaptoethanol. The eluant was diluted 10-fold with a buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, and 5 mM beta -mercaptoethanol and applied to Q-Sepharose FF from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. The CBF1 protein was eluted by a gradient from 0 to 0.8 M NaCl in a buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM beta -mercaptoethanol, and 10% glycerol. The purity of the protein was analyzed by SDS-PAGE. CBF1 with a histidine tag at the N terminus was used for gel shift assay, footprinting, CD and fluorescence measurements, and gel filtration analyses. CBF1 with a histidine tag at the C terminus was used as the substrate for the digestion with LEP to generate LEP peptides. The N-terminal sequence of CBF1 was confirmed by ProciseTM protein sequencing system from Applied Biosystems.

Gel Shift Assays and Footprinting-- A 21-base pair duplex that was chemically synthesized and contained the sequence of CRT/DRE was mixed with the CBF1 protein in 25 µl of a binding buffer containing 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, 30 mM NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 2 mM EDTA, and 10% glycerol, and the mixture was incubated for 20 min at room temperature and then electrophoresed on a nondenaturing 5% polyacrylamide gel at 100 V for 3 h. The bands containing DNA were visualized by ethidium bromide staining and UV illumination. DNase I footprinting was performed using a 74-base pair synthetic double-stranded DNA fragment that contained CRT/DRE and that had been labeled with 32P by end-filling with T7 sequenase from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. The binding reaction was performed as described above in the presence of 1 µg of poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC) (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). DNase I digestion and gel analysis were carried out as described (41). The G/A sequencing ladder was generated by performing Maxam-Gilbert chemical reaction (42) using the same 74-base pair DNA fragment.

Circular Dichroism-- CD spectra (200-300 nm) were measured on a J-720 automatic spectropolarimeter (Japan Spectroscopic Co., Ltd.). Spectra were obtained using solutions containing the proteins or the peptides at 0.3 mg/ml in 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer at pH 7.9 containing 0.5 mM dithiothreitol and 10% glycerol or 20 mM sodium acetate buffer at pH 5.5. The mean residue ellipticity [theta ], expressed in units of deg·cm2·dmol-1, was calculated by using an average amino acid molecular weight of 110.

Digestion with Lysyl Endopeptidase-- S-Carboxymethylation of CBF1 was carried out as follows: iodoacetic acid (10 mg) was added to a solution (4 ml) of CBF1 (1.3 mg) in 200 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, saturated with N2. The tube containing the reaction mixture was sealed and shaken at room temperature for 1 h in the dark. The resultant solution was dialyzed against a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 9.0, and 10 mM NaCl at 4 °C overnight. Carboxymethylated CBF1 (1.3 mg) was digested with LEP (25 µg) at 37 °C for 30 min to generate five peptides, which corresponded to the amino acid residues 1-32, 40-58, 59-68, 70-119, and 120-213, shown in Fig. 1b. These peptides were separated by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography using a TSK gel ODS-120T column, 4.6 × 250 mm (Tosho, Tokyo, Japan) with a 60-min linear gradient from 5 to 75% acetonitrile, containing 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid at the flow rate of 1 ml/min. Identification of the peptide in each peak was performed by comparison between the measured and theoretical mass values summarized in Table I and by N-terminal amino acid sequencing by stepwise Edman degradation. The CBF1 protein has five cysteine residues. The measured mass values of 3585.62 for LEP1 and 5609.96 for LEP4 (Table I) were larger than the theoretical mass values by 116.87 and 104.66, respectively, which corresponds to the mass value of two carboxymethyl groups. These results are consistent with the fact that four cysteine residues, at positions 23, 30, 100, and 117, were carboxymethylated. The mass spectrum of LEP5 could not be determined. However, a peak from a carboxymethylated cysteine residue was detected at step 14 of the Edman degradation of LEP5, indicating that the cysteine residue at position 137 was also carboxymethylated. Based on these results, we concluded that the five cysteine residues in CBF1 were in the reduced form and were carboxymethylated with iodoacetic acid.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Measured and theoretical mass values for the identification of the LEP peptides
The LEP digestion of CBF1 was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." The resultant LEP peptides were subjected to mass spectrometry using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry from PerSeptive Biosystems. Each peptide was identified by N-terminal amino acid sequencing.

Gel Filtration Chromatography of CBF1-- The gel filtration of the intact or truncated CBF1 protein was performed using Superdex 75 PC 3.2/30 in a SMART system from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech with a buffer containing 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.9, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, and 100 mM NaCl as the eluent with a flow rate of 30 µl/min at 4 or 25 °C.

Protein and Peptide Concentrations-- The protein concentration of CBF1 with a tag was determined from the UV absorption at 280 nm. The A2800.1% value of 1.43 for CBF1(1-213) with a molecular weight of 25,994 was calculated by using 1,576 M-1·cm-1 for tyrosine (×7) and 5,225 M-1·cm-1 for tryptophan (×5) at 280 nm (43). A2800.1% values of 1.57, 1.42, and 1.44 for CBF1(41-213), CBF1(41-157), and CBF1(41-146), respectively, were also calculated as described for CBF1(1-213). The concentrations of peptides were determined using the following formula: Concentration (µg/ml) = (A224 - A233.3) × 210 (44).

Secondary Structure Prediction-- The secondary structure of CBF1 was predicted using a neural network system that was offered as a service on the World Wide Web, the Predict Protein Server (http://www.emble-heidelberg.de/predictprotein/predictprotein.html). The program was provided by Rost and Sander (45).

Analytical Ultracentrifugation-- Analytical ultracentrifugation experiments were carried out in an Optima XL-I analytical ultracentrifuge (Beckman Instruments Inc.). In velocity sedimentation experiments, CBF1 (0.12 mg/ml) in a buffer containing 100 mM NaCl, 20 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.8, and 1 mM dithiothreitol was centrifuged at 50,000 rpm and 25 or 3 °C, and radial scans at 230 nm were taken at 5-min intervals for 4 h. The sedimentation coefficient, sT,b, and the diffusion coefficient, DT,b, were calculated by the second moment method with the Optima XL-A data analysis software supplied by Beckman. The values from the data at 25 and 3 °C were corrected to the standard conditions (water, 20 °C) to obtain the s20,w values (46, 47). They are designated as s25,b right-arrow  20,w and s3,b right-arrow  20,w, respectively. The value for the diffusion coefficient was corrected to standard conditions (water, 20 °C) to obtain the D20,w values. The frictional coefficient, f, of CBF1 was obtained by the Svedberg equation (47). The value of the partial specific volume, <A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>, of CBF1 was estimated from its amino acid composition (47) as 0.718 ml g-1. The degree of hydration, delta , was estimated using the method of Kuntz based on the amino acid composition (47). The frictional coefficient of the hydrated sphere, fsphere, was calculated by the equation from the Stokes-Einstein relationship (47). The hydrodynamic parameters were calculated according to the flow diagram by Waxman et al. (48).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Overproduction and Purification-- The expression of the CBF1 gene in the plasmid pETCBF1 was induced in E. coli by the addition of IPTG. The cultivation of the transformants was performed at 25 or 37 °C to examine the dependence of the solubility of CBF1 in cells on the temperature. The production level of CBF1 was estimated to be ~4 mg/liter of culture at 25 °C and ~8 mg/liter of culture at 37 °C, from the intensities of Coomassie Brilliant Blue-stained bands in SDS-polyacrylamide gels. The corresponding bands in SDS-polyacrylamide gels of the supernatants and pellets obtained after centrifugation of the suspension of sonicated cells showed that about 80% of the protein was soluble when the cultivation was carried out at 25 °C, whereas about 90% of the protein was insoluble at 37 °C (data not shown). Based on these results, the cultivation of E. coli transformants was carried out at 25 °C after the addition of IPTG in order to obtain the CBF1 protein in soluble form.

The CBF1 protein was efficiently and selectively trapped by the chelating column when a histidine tag was attached to the N or C terminus of CBF1. Elution with 300 mM imidazole solution yielded 3.3 mg of protein product containing CBF1 with 80% purity from 1 liter of culture. Subsequent ion exchange chromatography using Q-Sepharose FF yielded homogeneous CBF1, which appeared as a single band in SDS-PAGE analysis (data not shown). The final yield was 1.7 mg of the pure CBF1 protein from 1 liter of culture.

Construction of Truncated Mutants-- The CBF1 protein is composed of four regions, that is, the N-terminal region (1-32), the potential nuclear localization signal (33-44), the AP2 domain (48-106), and the acidic region (107-213) (12), as shown in Fig. 1a. In order to examine the effect of each region on the DNA binding of CBF1 and the temperature dependence of the structure of CBF1, three truncated CBF1 mutants were constructed, as shown in Fig. 1a. Amino acid residues from positions 1 to 40 in the N-terminal region were removed to construct CBF1(41-213), and in addition, the residues from positions 158 to 213 and those from positions 147 to 213 in the acidic region were also removed to construct CBF1(41-157) and CBF1(41-146), respectively (Fig. 1a). The levels of expression of the truncated proteins in E. coli were almost the same as that of the intact protein. The purification of CBF1(41-213) and CBF1(41-157) was performed by the procedure described above for CBF1(1-213). The predicted isoelectric points for CBF1(1-213), CBF1(41-213), CBF1(41-157), and CBF1(41-146) were 4.8, 4.6, 7.2, and 9.4, respectively. Because anion exchange chromatography was not appropriate for the purification of CBF1(41-146), it was purified by chelating and gel filtration column chromatography. The purified CBF1(41-213), CBF1(41-157), and CBF1(41-146) proteins with a histidine tag at the N terminus gave single bands in SDS-PAGE analysis (data not shown).


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Analysis of the CBF1 protein. a, schematic drawing showing locations of the N-terminal region, the potential nuclear localization signal (NLS), the AP2 domain, and the acidic region of the intact and truncated CBF1 proteins CBF1(1-213), CBF1(41-213), CBF1(41-157), and CBF1(41-146). Numbers indicate amino acid residues. b, schematic drawing showing locations of LEP peptides. c, schematic drawing showing locations of two alpha -helices and six beta -sheets predicted in the secondary structure. The solid and gray regions correspond to the alpha -helices and beta -sheets, respectively. d, schematic drawing showing locations of the regions estimated or suggested to exhibit cold denaturation and thermal denaturation by CD spectra of the intact and truncated CBF1 proteins.

DNA Binding of the Intact and Truncated CBF1 Proteins-- The binding ability of the purified CBF1 protein to CRT/DRE was analyzed by gel-shift assays, DNase I footprinting, and measurement of the intrinsic fluorescence. Gel-shift experiments were carried out to show that the CBF1 proteins bound to CRT/DRE (data not shown). No shift was detected without CBF1. Mobility shifts resulting from complex formation between CRT/DRE and the CBF1 proteins were observed in the assays. The migration of the complex-containing band became faster with increasing truncation of the CBF1 protein.

DNase I footprinting was performed to study whether the purified CBF1 protein was able to bind specifically to CRT/DRE. A 75-base pair synthetic oligonucleotide probe containing CRT/DRE was digested with DNase I in the presence or absence of CBF1(1-213) and analyzed on a 12% sequencing gel. As shown in Fig. 2, regions on both strands surrounding CRT/DRE were protected by CBF1(1-213) binding. On the bottom strand, 11 nucleotide residues including GTCGGC, were protected, whereas on the top strand, 20 nucleotide residues, including GCCGAC, were protected.


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   DNase I footprinting demonstrating the specific binding of CBF1(1-213) to CRT/DRE. The CRT/DRE probes were labeled on both strands (bottom and top) and incubated with or without CBF1. The reactions were analyzed on a 12% sequencing gel together with G/A sequencing ladders generated from the same probes. - and + refer to naked and complexed DNA fragments, respectively, and G/A refers to the sequencing ladder. The protected nucleotide residues are indicated by arrows.

The intrinsic fluorescence spectra were measured to determine the binding constants between the intact and truncated CBF1 proteins and CRT/DRE. The intensity of the fluorescence peak at 338 nm was decreased to about 60% of the maximum level by the addition of a double-stranded synthetic DNA fragment containing CRT/DRE (data not shown). Titration of CBF1 with a double-stranded CRT/DRE-containing oligomer caused changes in the fluorescence anisotropy of CBF1 (Fig. 3). The binding curves (Fig. 3) showed a stoichiometry of one protein bound per CRT/DRE either at 30 °C or at 1 °C. The apparent binding constant of CBF1(1-213) was (4.6 ± 0.9) × 107 M-1 at 1 °C, (4.8 ± 0.9) × 107 M-1 at 10 °C, (6.2 ± 1.4) × 107 M-1 at 20 °C, and (6.4 ± 0.7) × 107 M-1 at 30 °C. The apparent binding constants of the intact protein, CBF1(1-213) and the three truncated proteins, CBF1(41-213), CBF1(41-157), and CBF1(41-146), are summarized in Table II. The apparent binding constant of CBF1(41-213), lacking 40 amino acid residues in the N-terminal region, was (1.8 ± 0.4) × 108 M-1, suggesting that the N-terminal region is not necessary for the binding of CBF1 to CRT/DRE. The possible protein-protein interactions caused by the N-terminal region might reduce the apparent binding constant of the intact CBF1 protein. Two mutants, CBF1(41-157) and CBF1(41-146), lack 56 and 67 amino acid residues, respectively, in the acidic region. CBF1(41-146) bound to CRT/DRE less tightly than did CBF1(41-213), with a binding constant of (4.0 ± 0.8) × 107 M-1 (Table II).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Fluorescence quenching of the CBF1 protein by the addition of CRT/DRE, showing a stoichiometry of 1 DNA fragment bound per protein. Aliquots of a double-stranded DNA oligomer containing CRT/DRE were added to a solution of CBF1 in binding buffer at 1 °C (open circle ) or 30 °C ().

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Apparent binding constants of the intact and truncated CBF1 proteins at 20 °C
Aliquots of the double-stranded DNA oligomer containing CRT/DRE were added to a solution of CBF1 in the binding buffer to determine the binding constants at 20 °C by measuring the intrinsic fluorescence of the protein on a Hitachi F-4500 fluorescence spectrophotometer. The excitation wavelength was 279 nm, and the emission was monitored from 285 to 400 nm. The binding constant was calculated as described by Kelly et al. (56). The values are the average of three experiments with S.D.

Secondary Structures of the LEP-Peptides-- Stockinger et al. (12) reported that CBF1 had nine lysine residues at amino acid positions 32, 33, 38, 39, 58, 68, 69, 119, and 123. In order to study the structures of the peptides from CBF1, the CBF1 protein was digested with LEP. Prior to the digestion with LEP, the cysteine residues in the CBF1 protein were S-carboxymethylated, as described under "Experimental Procedures," to avoid the formation of non-native disulfide bonds during the protease digestion. Carboxymethyl-CBF1 was then digested with LEP to generate five peptides, LEP1, LEP2, LEP3, LEP4, and LEP5, shown in Fig. 1b. The measurement of the far-UV CD spectra of the peptides LEP1, LEP2, LEP3, LEP4, and LEP5 from CBF1 in aqueous solution was carried out at intervals of 10 °C by raising and lowering the temperature in the range between 2 and 60 °C. Fig. 4, a-e, shows the far-UV CD spectra of the peptides at 60 and 2 °C and those in 3 M GdnHCl. Fig. 4f shows the temperature dependence of the [theta ] value of each peptide at 220 nm. The CD spectra of LEP4, which included the latter half of the AP2 domain, were indicative of alpha -helicity (Fig. 4d). Its [theta ] value, -4300 at 220 nm at 60 °C, was the lowest among those of the five peptides, and it was decreased to -6400 by lowering the temperature to 2 °C (Fig. 4, d and f). The helical content of LEP4 was about 9% at 40-60 °C, and it was increased to about 17% by lowering the temperature to 2 °C. The difference between the [theta ] value at 220 nm in the spectrum of LEP4 at 60 °C and that in 3 M GdnHCl (Fig. 4d) suggested that LEP4 still had a considerable amount of thermally stable secondary structure at 60 °C but was almost completely denatured in 3 M GdnHCl.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   CD spectra and temperature dependence of the LEP peptides. The far-UV CD spectra measured at 2 °C (thick solid lines) and 60 °C (thin solid lines) and in the presence of 3 M GdnHCl (dot-dashed lines) of LEP1 (a), LEP2 (b), LEP3 (c), LEP4 (d), and LEP5 (e) and the temperature dependence (f) of LEP1 (black-diamond ), LEP2 (open circle ), LEP3 (diamond ), LEP4 (black-triangle), and LEP5 (×) are shown. The reversibility was confirmed by lowering the temperature from 60 to 2 °C and then raising it from 2 to 60 °C.

In contrast, the CD spectra of the other four peptides, LEP1, LEP2, LEP3, and LEP5, were indicative of random coil, and the negative molar ellipticity at 220 nm at 60 °C was lower than that at 2 °C (Fig. 4, a-e). The molar ellipticity for the four peptides at 220 nm increased as the temperature was decreased from 60 to 2 °C (Fig. 4f). The spectrum of LEP1 at 2 °C was very similar to that of the same peptide denatured with 3 M GdnHCl (Fig. 4a). The similarity between the spectrum of the peptide at 2 °C and that of the peptide denatured in 3 M GdnHCl was also observed for LEP2, LEP3, and LEP5 as shown in Fig. 4, b, c, and e, respectively. These results suggest that thermally stable secondary structure was present at 60 °C, decreased with decreasing temperature, and was almost completely absent at 2 °C in the four peptides LEP1, LEP2, LEP3, and LEP5. These results suggest that LEP1, LEP2, LEP3, and LEP5 exhibited cold denaturation; in contrast, LEP4 exhibited cold stabilization, with an increase of secondary structure, when the temperature decreased from 60 to 2 °C.

Secondary Structures of the Intact and Truncated CBF1 Proteins-- The far-UV CD spectra of the intact and truncated CBF1 proteins were measured at various temperatures in the range between -5 and 70 °C by lowering the temperature from 30 to -5 °C, raising it from -5 to 70 °C, and again lowering it from 70 to 2 °C, in steps of 10 °C (Fig. 5). The spectra of the intact CBF1 protein, (1-213) and of the truncated proteins, (41-213), (41-157), and (41-146), in the solution at pH 7.9 containing 10% glycerol at -5, 30, and 70 °C, and those in 3 M GdnHCl solution, are shown in Fig. 5, a-d, respectively. The helical content of the protein, which was calculated by the method of Wu et al. (49), increased with increasing truncation of both the N-terminal and acidic regions in the following order: CBF1(1-213) (13.8%) < CBF1(41-213) (15.5%) < CBF1(41-157) (22.3%) < CBF1(41-146) (23.0%). The temperature dependence of the [theta ] value at 220 nm for the proteins is shown in Fig. 5, e-h. The negative molar ellipticity at 220 nm in the spectrum of CBF1(1-213) was -5090 at -5 °C, -5600 at 30 °C, and -4300 at 70 °C (Fig. 5a). The ellipticity at 220 nm was minimal (-5600) at 30 °C, increased by about 500 (to -5090) as the temperature was decreased from 30 to -5 °C, and also increased by about 1300 (to -4300) as the temperature was raised from 30 to 70 °C (Fig. 5e). Similar temperature dependence of the ellipticity was observed in the spectra of CBF1(41-213) and CBF1(41-157) (Fig. 5, b, c, f, and g). These results strongly suggest that reversible cold denaturation of the secondary structure occurred in the temperature range between 30 and -5 °C and that thermal denaturation also occurred in the range between 40 and 60 °C in CBF1(1-213), CBF1(41-213), and CBF1(41-157). The ratio of the change in the ellipticity at 220 nm resulting from possible cold denaturation to that resulting from thermal denaturation was 500/1300 for CBF1(1-213), 500/1600 for CBF1(41-213), and 400/2700 for CBF1(41-157) (Fig. 5, e-g). The ratio decreased with increasing truncation of the protein in the following order: CBF1(1-213) > CBF1(41-213) > CBF1(41-157). An increase of the ellipticity as the temperature was decreased from 30 to -5 °C was not observed in CBF1(41-146), as shown in Fig. 5, d and h, suggesting that the region exhibiting the cold denaturation was removed from the protein by the truncation. The increase of the ellipticity between 40 and 60 °C was still observed in the spectra of CBF1(41-146) (Fig. 5, d and h). These results strongly suggest that the region exhibiting the possible cold denaturation was diminished or removed by the truncation of the protein, whereas the region exhibiting the thermal denaturation remained despite the truncation. The change of ellipticity was reversible in the temperature range between -5 and 30 °C in the spectra of all CBF1 proteins (Fig. 5, e-h). These results suggest that the CBF1 protein has regions exhibiting cold denaturation and thermal denaturation and that the regions exhibiting cold denaturation are present in the N-terminal region and in the acidic region, whereas the region exhibiting the thermal denaturation is present in the region that includes the AP2 domain. The data also show that the secondary structure of CBF1 is most stable at around 30 °C.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   CD spectra and temperature dependence of the intact and truncated CBF1 proteins. The far-UV CD spectra measured at -5 °C (thick solid lines), 30 °C (thin solid lines), and 70 °C (dashed lines) or in the presence of 3 M GdnHCl (dot-dashed lines) of CBF1(1-213) (a), CBF1(41-213) (b), CBF1(41-157) (c), and CBF1(41-146) (d) are shown in the top row. The plots showing the temperature dependence of CBF1(1-213) (e), CBF1(41-213) (f), CBF1(41-157) (g), and CBF1(41-146) (h) are shown in the bottom row. The temperature was lowered from 30 to -5 °C (open circle ), raised from -5 to 70 °C (), and again lowered from 70 to 2 °C (+) at intervals of 10 °C.

The spectra of the CBF1 proteins in 3 M GdnHCl (Fig. 5, a-d) exhibited slight negative ellipticity around 220 nm, suggesting that the secondary structure of the protein was almost completely denatured in 3 M GdnHCl. Comparison between the spectra of the protein at 70 °C and those of the protein in 3 M GdnHCl suggests that the CBF1 proteins still had a considerable amount of thermally stable secondary structure at 70 °C. The salt (100 mM NaCl) did not affect the CD amplitude at around 220 nm or the temperature dependence of the molar ellipticity at 220 nm (data not shown). The helical contents of CBF1 were calculated as 13.8% at 30 °C and 11.7% at 2 °C, by the method of Wu et al. (49).

Secondary Structure Prediction of CBF1-- The predicted secondary structure of CBF1 is summarized in Fig. 1c. The analysis suggested that residues 4-10 and 79-94 had the propensity to form alpha -helices, whereas residues 60-64, 70-75, 99-101, 136-140, 153-156, and 208-212 had the propensity to form beta -sheet structures. The prediction of the formation of the alpha -helix designated as helix 2 for residues 79-94 (Fig. 1c) agreed with the conclusions about the secondary structure of CBF1 from the CD spectroscopy.

Gel Filtration of the Intact and Truncated CBF1 Proteins at 4 and 25 °C-- Gel filtration of CBF1(1-213), CBF1(41-213), CBF1(41-157), and CBF1(41-146) was performed at 4 and 25 °C to examine the change in the molecular shape and volume of the CBF1 protein caused by lowering the temperature. The values of the relative retention volumes (Ve/Vo) for each protein at 4 and 25 °C are shown in Fig. 6. The retention volume for each protein was smaller at 4 °C than at 25 °C. The difference between the retention volume for each protein at 4 °C and that at 25 °C decreased with increasing truncation of the protein. The difference for CBF1(41-146) was smallest and was almost the same as that for the standard proteins. The apparent molecular weights for the proteins are as follows: 38,900 at 4 °C and 33,100 at 25 °C for CBF1(1-213), 29,500 at 4 °C and 25,700 at 25 °C for CBF1(41-213), 15,800 at 4 °C and 15,500 at 25 °C for CBF1(41-157), and 9800 at 4 °C and 9800 for 25 °C for CBF1(41-146). These results suggest that extension of the CBF1 molecule was caused by cold denaturation. The molecule was extended by 18, 15, 3, and 0% for CBF1(1-213), CBF1(41-213), CBF1(41-157), and CBF1(41-146), respectively.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Estimation of the apparent molecular weight of the intact and truncated CBF1 proteins at 4 and 25 °C to examine the change of the molecular shape caused by lowering the temperature. A plot of log molecular weight versus Ve/Vo for the protein standards is shown. The protein standards were bovine gamma globulin (GG), ovalbumin (OA) from chicken, myoglobin (MG) from horse, and vitamin B-12 (VB), with molecular weights of 158,000, 44,000, 17,000, and 1350, respectively. The retention volumes for CBF1(1-213) were 1.17 ± 0.00 ml at 4 °C and 1.20 ± 0.00 ml at 25 °C; those for CBF1(41-213) were 1.22 ± 0.01 ml at 4 °C and 1.25 ± 0.00 ml at 25 °C; those for CBF1(41-157) were 1.35 ± 0.00 ml at 4 °C and 1.36 ± 0.00 ml at 25 °C; and those for CBF1(41-146) were 1.44 ± 0.01 ml at 4 °C and 1.45 ± 0.01 ml at 25 °C. The values are the average of 3-6 experiments with S.D. Ve/Vo values obtained for the CBF1 proteins, 1.27 for CBF1(1-213) at 4 °C (arrow 1), 1.30 for CBF1(1-213) at 25 °C (arrow 2), 1.33 for CBF1(41-213) at 4 °C (arrow 3), 1.36 for CBF1(41-213) at 25 °C (arrow 4), 1.47 for CBF1(41-157) at 4 °C (arrow 5), 1.48 for CBF1(41-157) at 25 °C (arrow 6), 1.57 for CBF1(41-146) at 4 °C (arrow 7), and 1.58 for CBF1(41-146) at 25 °C (arrow 8), are indicated. Ve/Vo values of the standard proteins and the CBF1 proteins obtained at 4 °C are indicated by open circles and open arrows, respectively. Those obtained at 25 °C are indicated by shaded circles and shaded arrows.

Ultracentrifugation Studies-- Sedimentation velocity experiments were carried out to determine the sedimentation and diffusion coefficients, s20,w and D20,w, respectively. The sedimentation process of a 50,000 rpm centrifugation of CBF1 at 25 or 3 °C was analyzed by following the movement of the boundary. Table III summarizes the results from the sedimentation velocity analysis. The corrected sedimentation coefficient, s25,b right-arrow  20,w, obtained from the data at 25 °C was (1.71 ± 0.06) × 10-13 s, and that obtained from the data at 3 °C (s3,b right-arrow  20,w) was (1.42 ± 0.07) × 10-13 s (Table III). This sedimentation coefficient change reflects the conformational transition of the CBF1 protein caused by lowering the temperature from 25 to 3 °C. The increase of the friction ratio f/fsphere from 1.52 ± 0.05 to 1.83 ± 0.09 caused by lowering the temperature from 25 to 3 °C suggests a change of the axial ratio of the molecule. The decrease of the diffusion coefficient D20,w caused by lowering the temperature (Table III) may be correlated with the conformational change of CBF1 caused by lowering the temperature.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III
Hydrodynamic parameters of CBF1


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Possible local cold denaturation suggested by the CD measurement and gel filtration analyses is thought to be a characteristic property of the CBF1 protein. The regions that caused cold denaturation suggested by the CD spectra of the intact and truncated CBF1 proteins were present in residues 1-40 and 147-213, as shown in Fig. 1d. The retention times of the intact and truncated CBF1 proteins in gel filtration (Fig. 6) and the results from the sedimentation velocity analysis suggested the following: (i) the intact and truncated CBF1 proteins were monomeric; (ii) the shape of CBF1(1-213) was not spherical, but rather extended, whereas that of CBF1(41-146) was likely to be spherical; (iii) the volume of a molecule of CBF1(1-213) at 4 °C was larger than that at 25 °C; and (iv) the difference between the molecular volume at 4 °C and that at 25 °C decreased with increasing truncation of the protein, suggesting that the local cold denaturation was accompanied by the extension of the protein molecule.

CBF1 could bind to CRT/DRE both at normal and at near-zero temperatures in vitro (Fig. 3). However, CBF1 in Arabidopsis did not activate the transcription of the COR gene at normal temperatures (12). It seems to be necessary for CBF1 bound to CRT/DRE to be transformed from a repressor to an activator via the reduction of temperature in Arabidopsis. Thus, we propose two possible models to explain the transcriptional activation involving CBF1. The first model is that the local cold denaturation of CBF1 caused by the low temperature initiates the transcriptional activation of the COR gene, because extension of the molecule resulting from the cold denaturation facilitates interaction with the factor(s) that activate or initiate transcription of the genes. The second model is that other cofactor(s) associate with CBF1 for repression of the transcription at normal temperatures, but these factors are released from the locally denatured CBF1 protein, which results in the transcriptional activation, at the low temperature. Jaglo-Ottosen et al. (13) reported that CBF1 overexpression induced COR gene expression without a low temperature stimulus, probably suggesting the shortage of some repressor to suppress the transcription. This result seems to support the second model.

The content of secondary structure in the peptides LEP1, LEP2, LEP3, and LEP5 was largest at 60 °C, in the temperature range between 2 and 60 °C, as shown in Fig. 4. The intact and truncated CBF1 proteins also still had considerable amounts of secondary structure at 70 °C, after thermal denaturation between 40 and 60 °C as shown in Fig. 5, a-d. The residual structure was thermally stable but was denatured in 3 M GdnHCl, suggesting that it was maintained by hydrophobic interactions (50).

Cold denaturation is thought to be caused by the interaction between water and nonpolar groups exposed to the solvent (51). The nonpolar groups are usually buried in a protein molecule by hydrophobic interactions at normal temperatures. As the temperature is decreased, the hydrophobic forces are reduced, and the resultant disruption of the hydrophobic interactions results in the denaturation of the structure at low temperatures. Cold denaturation has been observed in multimeric enzymes, such as ATPases and fatty-acid synthetases, as well as in proteins under destabilizing conditions, such as moderate denaturant concentrations, low pH, or high pressure (51), and in proteins destabilized by site-directed mutagenesis (52), as well as in the artificially designed peptides (53). The possible cold denaturation of CBF1 suggested by the CD spectra, gel filtration, and ultracentrifuge analyses is thought to be a rare case, in which a monomeric protein with a natural sequence possibly exhibits the cold denaturation under physiological conditions. It seems likely that this cold denaturation of CBF1 leads to initiation of the transcriptional activation, because cold denaturation is thought to be a direct physical response of the protein to the low temperature stimulus, and it seems reasonable that the plant might utilize the physical properties of its constituents to respond to this environmental change. Some physiological and biochemical properties conferring tolerance to cold temperatures have been reported, such as an increase of the degree of unsaturation of fatty acids in the membrane, and the accumulation of osmolytes. Murata et al. (54) reported that the sensitivity of plants to cold stimuli was correlated with the degree of unsaturation of fatty acids of the membrane and that the tolerance was improved by introducing an appropriate glycerol-3-phosphate acetyltransferase. Xin and Browse (55) reported a mutant of Arabidopsis with constitutive freezing tolerance conferred by the accumulation of proline.

The CD spectra of the intact CBF1 protein seemed to show that the secondary structure content of CBF1 was relatively low (Fig. 5a). Secondary structure prediction suggested that there were only two alpha -helices, one in the N-terminal region and one in the AP2 domain (Fig. 1c, helix1 and helix2). The formation of helix2 in the AP2 domain was confirmed by the CD spectrum of the peptide LEP4 (Fig. 4d). However, the CD spectra of the LEP peptides other than LEP4 were mainly consistent with random coil. In general, the structure of a peptide does not completely match the structure of the corresponding region in the protein, because of different environments or neighborhoods, but the structure of the peptide does reflect a tendency to form a particular structure based on a particular amino acid sequence. The CD spectra of the LEP peptides (Fig. 4) suggest that the peptide sequences in both the N-terminal and the acidic regions have a tendency to cause cold denaturation and that the CBF1 protein has at least one alpha -helix in the AP2 domain, which functions in DNA binding. The calculated helical content of the protein, based on the CD spectra in Fig. 5, a-d, increased with increasing truncation of both the N-terminal and acidic regions, possibly suggesting that the alpha -helix could form in the AP2 domain despite the truncation. It is very likely that the thermal denaturation between 40 and 60 °C, shown in Fig. 5, e-h, is due to the thermal destabilization of the AP2 domain. In addition, the spectra shown in Fig. 5d and the thermal denaturation plot shown in Fig. 5h suggest that the region around the AP2 domain does not participate in the cold denaturation. The fact that the CBF1 protein could bind to CRT/DRE with same stoichiometry at 1 °C and at 30 °C in vitro (Fig. 3) is consistent with the fact that the structure of the region around the AP2 domain was stable in the temperature range between -5 and 30 °C, as shown in Fig. 5, d and h. The amphipathic alpha -helix (Fig. 1c, helix2), which was previously predicted in the AP2 domain (16), is thought to be a core structure of the CBF1 protein.

On the other hand, the formation of helix1 that was predicted as shown in Fig. 1c was not clearly demonstrated. The plot of the [theta ] values at 220 nm as a function of temperature showed that the values for LEP1 were lower than those for LEP2, LEP3, and LEP5 by about 1000, and higher than those for LEP4 (Fig. 4f). The spectrum of LEP1 at 60 °C (Fig. 4a) exhibited a slight hump around 220 nm. These results might suggest that LEP1, which corresponds to the amino acid residues 1-32 in CBF1, included a small amount of helicity (corresponding to helix1 in Fig. 1c). Limited proteolysis of the CBF1·CRT/DRE complex with trypsin selectively released the N-terminal fragment 1-41 (data not shown). The binding ability of CBF1 was improved by the removal of the region 1-40, as summarized in Table II. These results suggest that the region from positions 1-40 is not necessary for the binding of CBF1 to CRT/DRE. On the other hand, the results of the present study and its location close to the nuclear localization signal (Fig. 1a) might suggest some function for the N-terminal region. Finally, the creation of transgenic Arabidopsis plants that overexpress the intact or truncated CBF1 will be helpful for determining the molecular components of the cold stress-responsive pathway involving CBF1.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank T. Wada and M. Shimizu for helpful discussions, R. Kikuno for the secondary structure prediction, and A. Ritani and A. Sato for helpful comments about the ultracentrifuge experiments. We thank E. M. Nakajima for reading the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 06-6872-8204; Fax: 06-6872-8219; E-mail: ekanaya{at}beri.co.jp.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: ABA, abscisic acid; CRT/DRE, C-repeat/dehydration-responsive element; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; IPTG, isopropyl-beta -D-thiogalactopyranoside; GdnHCl, guanidine hydrochloride; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; LEP, lysyl endopeptidase.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
  1. Shinozaki, K., and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. (1996) Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 7, 161-167[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Marcotte, W. R., Jr., Bayley, C. C., and Quatrano, R. S. (1988) Nature 335, 454-457[CrossRef]
  3. Marcotte, W. R., Russell, S. H., and Quatrano, R. S. (1989) Plant Cell 1, 969-976[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Mundy, J., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., and Chua, N. H. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 1406-1410[Abstract]
  5. Guiltinan, M. J., Marcotte, W. R., Jr., and Quatrano, R. S. (1990) Science 250, 267-271[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Gosti, F., Bertauche, N., Vatanian, N., and Girodat, J. (1995) Mol. Gen. Genet. 246, 10-18[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Nordin, K., Heino, P., and Palva, E. T. (1991) Plant Mol. Biol. 16, 1061-1071[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Mahapatra, S. S., Wolfraim, L., Poole, R. J., and Dhindsa, R. S. (1989) Plant Physiol. 89, 375-380
  9. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., and Shinozaki, K. (1994) Plant Cell 6, 251-264[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Baker, S. S., Wilhelm, K. S., and Thomashow, M. F. (1994) Plant Mol. Biol. 24, 701-713[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Jiang, C., Iu, B., and Singh, J. (1996) Plant Mol. Biol. 30, 679-684[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Stockinger, E. J., Gilmour, S. J., and Thomashow, M. F. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 1035-1040[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Jaglo-Ottosen, K. R., Gilmour, S. J., Zarka, D. G., Schabenberger, O., and Thomashow, M. F. (1998) Science 280, 104-106[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Gilmour, S. J., Zarka, D. G., Stockinger, E. J., Salazar, M. P., Houghton, J. M., and Thomashow, M. F. (1998) Plant J. 16, 433-442[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Medina, J., Bargues, M., Terol, J., Perez-Alonso, M., and Salinas, J. (1999) Plant Physiol. 119, 463-470[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Weigel, D. (1995) Plant Cell 7, 388-389[Free Full Text]
  17. Ohme-Takagi, M., and Shinshi, H. (1995) Plant Cell 7, 173-182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Jofuku, K. D., den Boer, B. G. W., Van Montagu, M., and Okamuro, J. K. (1994) Plant Cell 6, 1211-1225[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Klucher, K. M., Chow, H., Reiser, L., and Fisher, R. L. (1996) Plant Cell 8, 137-153[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Elliott, R. C., Betzner, A. S., Huttner, E., Oakes, M. P., Tucker, W. Q. J., Gerentes, D., Perez, P., and Smyth, D. R. (1996) Plant Cell 8, 155-168[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Wilson, K., Long, D., Swinburne, J., and Coupland, G. (1996) Plant Cell 8, 659-671[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Büttner, M., and Singh, K. B. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 5961-5966[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Okamuro, J. K., Caster, B., Villarroel, R., Van Montagu, M., and Jofuku, K. D. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 7076-7081[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Moose, S. P., and Sisco, P. H. (1996) Genes Dev. 10, 3018-3027[Abstract]
  25. Ma, J., and Ptashne, M. (1987) Cell 48, 847-853[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Hope, I. A., Mahadevan, S., and Struhl, K. (1988) Nature 333, 635-640[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Gerster, T., and Roeder, R. G. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 6347-6351[Abstract]
  28. O'Hare, P., Goding, C. R., and Haigh, A. (1988) EMBO J. 7, 4231-4238[Abstract]
  29. Preston, C. M., Frame, M. C., and Campbell, M. (1988) Cell 52, 425-434[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Truant, R., Xiao, H., Ingles, C. J., and Greenblatt, J. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 2284-2287[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Blair, W. S., Bogerd, H. P., Madore, S. J., and Cullen, B. R. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 7226-7234[Abstract]
  32. Roben, S. M., Narayanan, R., Klement, J. F., Chen, C. H., and Rosen, C. A. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 444-454[Abstract]
  33. Lin, Y. S., and Green, M. R. (1991) Cell 64, 971-981[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Lin, Y. S., Maldonado, E., Reinberg, D., and Green, M. R. (1991) Nature 353, 569-571[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Greenblatt, J., and Ingles, C. J. (1996) Methods Enzymol. 274, 120-133[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Berger, S. L., Piña, B., Silverman, N., Marcus, G. A., Agapite, J., Regier, J. L., Triezenberg, S. J., and Guarente, L. (1992) Cell 70, 251-265[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Hopkins, F. G. (1930) Nature 126, 383-384
  38. Privalov, P. L., Griko, Yu. V., Venyaminov, S. Yu., and Kutyshenko, V. P. (1986) J. Mol. Biol. 190, 487-498[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Miller, J. H. (ed) (1972) Experiments in Molecular Genetics, p. 433, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  40. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Leblanc, B., and Moss, T. (1994) DNA-Protein Interactions: Methods in Molecular Biology 2, Vol. 30, pp. 1-10, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
  42. Maxam, A. M., and Gilbert, W. (1980) Methods Enzymol. 65, 499-560[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Goodwin, T. W., and Morton, R. A. (1946) Biochem. J. 40, 628-632
  44. Groves, W. E., Davis, F. C., and Sells, B. H. (1968) Anal. Biochem. 22, 195-210[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Rost, B., and Sander, C. (1993) J. Mol. Biol. 232, 584-599[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. van Holde, K. E. (1985) Physical Biochemistry, 2nd Ed., pp. 225-291, Prentice-Hall, Inc., New York
  47. Laue, T. M., Shah, B. D., Ridgeway, T. M., and Pelletier, S. L. (1993) in Analytical Ultracentrifugation in Biochemistry and Polymer Science (Harding, S. E., Rowe, A. J., and Horton, J. C., eds), pp. 90-125, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge
  48. Waxman, E., Laws, W. R., Laue, T. M., Nemerson, Y., and Ross, J. B. A. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 3005-3012[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Wu, C.-S. C., Ikeda, K., and Yang, J. T. (1981) Biochemistry 20, 566-570[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Kauzmann, W. (1959) Adv. Protein Chem. 14, 1-63
  51. Privalov, P. L. (1990) Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 25, 281-305[Abstract]
  52. Antonino, L. C., Kautz, R. A., Nakano, T., Fox, R. O., and Fink, A. L. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 7715-7718[Abstract]
  53. Kitakuni, E., Kuroda, Y., Oobatake, M., Tanaka, T., and Nakamura, H. (1994) Protein Sci. 3, 831-837[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Murata, N., Ishizaki-Nishizawa, O., Higashi, S., Hayashi, H., Tasaka, Y., and Nishida, I. (1992) Nature 356, 710-713[CrossRef]
  55. Xin, Z., and Browse, J. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 7799-7804[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Kelly, R. C., Jensen, D. E., and von Hippel, P. H. (1976) J. Biol. Chem. 251, 7240-7250[Abstract]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.