CCAAT Enhancer-binding Protein beta  and GATA-4 Binding Regions within the Promoter of the Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein (StAR) Gene Are Required for Transcription in Rat Ovarian Cells*

Eran Silverman, Sarah Eimerl, and Joseph OrlyDagger

From the Department of Biological Chemistry, Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) is a vital accessory protein required for biosynthesis of steroid hormones from cholesterol. The present study shows that in primary granulosa cells from prepubertal rat ovary, StAR transcript and protein are acutely induced by gonadotropin (FSH). To determine the sequence elements required for hormone inducibility of the StAR promoter, truncated regions of the -1002/+6 sequence of the mouse gene were ligated to pCAT-Basic plasmid and transfected by electroporation to freshly prepared cells. FSH inducibility determined over a 6-h incubation was 10-40-fold above basal levels of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase activity. These functional studies, supported by electrophoretic mobility shift assays indicated that two sites were sufficient for transcription of the StAR promoter constructs: a non-consensus binding sequence (-81/-72) for CCAAT enhancer-binding protein beta  (C/EBPbeta ) and a consensus motif for GATA-4 binding (-61/-66). Western analyses showed that GATA-4 is constitutively expressed in the granulosa cells, while all isoforms of C/EBPbeta were markedly inducible by FSH. Site-directed mutations of both binding sequences practically ablated both basal and hormone-driven chloramphenicol acetyltransferase activities to less than 5% of the parental -96/+6 construct. Unlike earlier notions, elimination of potential binding sites for steroidogenic factor-1, a well known tissue-specific transcription factor, did not impair StAR transcription. Consequently, we propose that C/EBPbeta and GATA-4 represent a novel combination of transcription factors capable of conferring an acute response to hormones upon their concomitant binding to the StAR promoter.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The first and key reaction in the enzymatic cascade of steroid hormone biosynthesis is catalyzed in the mitochondria by cholesterol side chain cleavage cytochrome P450 (P450scc)1 (1-3). In the presence of atmospheric oxygen and reducing power provided by associated proteins, P450scc converts cholesterol substrate to the first steroid prototype molecule, pregnenolone (1). In order to do so, a supply of cholesterol is required to be transferred from cytosolic pools into the inner membranes of the mitochondrion, where P450scc resides (4-7). Recently, it was found that cholesterol delivery into the mitochondria is enhanced by a novel protein (8, 9) designated steroidogenic acute regulatory (StAR) protein (reviewed in Refs. 10-12). More studies have established the fact that StAR is a vital protein essential for steroidogenesis in the adrenal cortex and the gonads (13, 14). In rodents, StAR is also expressed in steroidogenic brain cells (15) and placenta.2 Interestingly, StAR is not expressed in human placenta, where its role is probably assumed by a less efficient StAR substitute called MLN64 (16). Perhaps the most compelling evidence for the critical role of StAR in steroidogenesis was the discovery that various mutations of the StAR gene encoding a functionally impaired protein (14) cause a syndrome known as lipoid congenital adrenal hyperplasia (17). Affected individuals die shortly after birth in the absence of adrenal steroids, unless treated with steroid hormone replacement therapy. Similar patterns were also observed in StAR null mice (14).

Trophic hormones, such as gonadotropins and ACTH, trigger up-regulation of StAR expression by cAMP signaling (18-20). Additionally, Ca2+ changes evoke StAR expression in glomerulosa cells of the adrenal cortex (21, 22). Very little is known about the factors controlling StAR expression at the transcriptional level, downstream to the signal transduction pathways. Special attention has been devoted to examine the potential involvement of the steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1, or Ad4BP), which is a pivotal tissue-specific orphan nuclear receptor essential for regulation of many steroid hydroxylases in steroid-producing tissues (23, 24). In light of the fact that StAR promoter includes several putative recognition sites for SF-1 binding, several attempts have be made to determine if the latter factor is involved in StAR regulation. At present, the available results are somewhat inconsistent. Using the human, mouse, and rat promoters, an apparent up-regulation of StAR transcription by SF-1 could be demonstrated upon co-transfection of SF-1 cDNA and promoter-reporter plasmids in non-steroidogenic cells (25-29). However, other studies analyzing the activity of StAR promoter in SF-1-expressing cells did not support a role for SF-1 in a cAMP-inducible fashion (30). These data suggested that SF-1 may not confer cAMP responsiveness in authentic steroidogenic cells and, therefore, cannot be an exclusive transcription factor controlling the acute regulation of StAR in such cells.

In search for alternative regulatory elements that can mediate the acute response of StAR to hormones, we undertook to study the inducibility of the mouse promoter in ovarian granulosa cells from prepubertal rats. Earlier studies have unambiguously shown that endogenous SF-1 in these cells is critical for the induction of P450scc and P450aromatase by follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (31-34). In contrast, the present study suggests that SF-1 is probably not involved in hormonal activation of StAR promoter. We also demonstrate that promoter regions capable of C/EBPbeta and GATA-4 binding are required for activation of StAR transcription in FSH-treated cells. Thus, StAR provides the first example of a steroidogenesis-associated protein that is transcriptionally controlled by C/EBPbeta and/or GATA-4.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- Ovine FSH (NIDDK-oFSH-20) was kindly provided by the National Institute of Health NIAMD (Bethesda, MD.). Acetyl-CoA, poly(dI-dC), RNase A, indomethacin, proteinase K, sodium orthovanadate, aprotinin, NaF, pepstatin, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit and peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-goat sera were obtained from Sigma. Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and Ham's F-12 medium were from Grand Island Biological, New York. Polyclonal antisera to C/EBPbeta (sc-150x), C/EBPalpha (sc-61x), Sp1 (sc-059x), GATA-4 (sc-1237x), GATA-6 (sc-7244x), c-Fos (sc-253x), and c-Jun/AP-1 (sc-44x) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). SF-1 antibody was purchased from Upstate Biotechnology Inc. (Lake Placid, NY).

Animals-- Intact, immature female Sprague-Dawley rats (21 days old) were obtained from Harlan (Jerusalem, Israel) and maintained under 16:8 light:dark schedule with food and water ad libitum. Animals were treated in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. All protocols had the approval of the Institutional Committee on Animal Care and Use, Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Naive granulosa cells for CAT assays were expressed form E2-primed rats (35). Preovulatory PMSG-hCG-treated ovaries were prepared by administration of 15 IU of PMSG (PMSG 600, Intervet, Angers, France) to 25-day-old rats, which were further treated with 4 IU of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG, Organon Special Chemicals, West Orange, NJ) administered (subcutaneously) 50 h later. The animals were sacrificed at 8 h after hCG, and ovaries were retrieved for protein extraction. Also, post-ovulatory ovaries enriched with corpora lutea were similarly harvested 72 h after onset of PMSG-hCG treatment.

Cell Cultures-- To obtain granulosa cells expressing low basal levels of CAT, we used a modification of a previously described method (35). Briefly, after incubation in hypertonic sucrose/EGTA-containing medium, the ovaries were incubated for additional 45 min in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/F-12 medium containing 10 µM indomethacin. The same medium also served for further procedures, including needle pricking of the ovaries and post-electroporation treatments. After electroporation the cells were plated onto serum-coated wells (35) (24-well plated; Nunc, Copenhagen, Denmark) and incubated at 37 °C in 95% air and 5% CO2.

Electroporation and CAT Assay-- Estradiol-primed granulosa cells (4 × 105) obtained from 3-4 ovaries were electroporated in the presence of 20 µg of DNA as described before (35). Cells from each cuvette were seeded into four wells and hormonal treatments were initiated after a 3-h recovery period. Following a 6-h treatment with FSH (100 ng/ml), cell lysates were prepared and CAT activity was analyzed as described previously (35). Quantitation of the CAT assay was performed using a Fuji Bio-Imaging analyzer (BAS-1000, Fuji Photo Film, Tokyo, Japan). Protein was determined by a modified method of Bradford (36) using the Bio-Rad protein assay. Data are presented as percent of [14C]chloramphenicol (Amersham International, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom) converted to its acetylated products (per protein and time of assay) and the -fold induction of CAT activity over basal values measured in the absence of hormone. Data are presented as the mean ± S.E. of several independent transfections as indicated in each figure.

Whole Tissue Extracts for EMSA-- Whole ovarian extracts for EMSA was performed as described before (37). Briefly, ovaries were homogenized in a Dounce homogenizer using 2-3 volumes of buffer A containing 400 mM KCl, 10 mM NaH2PO4, (pH 7.4), 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 5 µM NaF, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 5 µg/ml aprotinin, 2 µM pepstatin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Following homogenization, the protein slurry was freeze-thawed three times in liquid nitrogen and finally centrifuged for 2 min at 14,000 × g. After determination of the protein content, the supernatant was aliquoted and kept at -70 °C until use.

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay-- Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) was performed as described before (37). Briefly, whole cell extracts (3-15 µg) were incubated with 2 ng of double-stranded DNA, previously labeled by a fill-in reaction using Klenow fragment (Promega, Madison, WI) and [alpha -32P]-dCTP (Amersham International, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom). Incubation was performed using a final volume of 30 µl of buffer containing 100 mM KCl, 15 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM MgCl2, 12% glycerol, and 4.5 µg of poly(dI-dC). After incubation for 35 min at room temperature, the binding reactions were resolved on pre-run 5% acrylamide gel as described previously for quantitative RT-PCR analyses (38). When competition experiments were conducted in the presence of molar excess of cold probe, the protein extracts were added last to the reaction mixture. When antibodies were used for supershift (or ablation) of a given protein-DNA complex, the protein extracts were preincubated for 25 min at room temperature with 2-8 µg of the antiserum, prior to the addition of the DNA-labeled probe. The following oligonucleotide probes used for EMSA included overhanging restriction site sequences: SCC1(SF-1) (32) (upper strand, 5'-GATCGCCCTCTCTTAGCCTTGAGCTA GTTA); consensus Sp1 (upper strand, 5'-GATCCGATCGGGGCGGGGCGAGC); -148/-127 StAR (upper strand, 5'-TGCTCCCTCCCACCTTGGCCAG); -148/-127mut2Sp1 (upper strand, 5'-TGCTCCCTCtgACCTTGGCCAG); -87/-70 StAR (upper strand, 5'-GGCCAAGCTTGCACAATGACTGATGACT); and -73/42 StAR (upper strand, 5'-GGCCAAGCTTGACTTTTTTATCTCAAGTGATGATGCACAGCC).

Promoter Constructs-- A previously published sequence of the 5'-flanking region of the mouse StAR gene (30), was used to clone most of the StAR promoter constructs by a PCR-based approach. 5'-HindIII and 3'-XbaI cloning sites were included in all forward and reverse primers, respectively. To generate the -1002/+6 DNA fragment, the oligonucleotide sequence -1002/-982 (5'-GGCCAAGCTTTTCTAAGGTTCCCTGGATCT) and -14/+6 (5'-GGCCTCTAGAAGCTGTGGCGCAGATCAAGT) were included in the PCR reaction (38) using mouse genomic DNA (prepared as described in Ref. 39), as template. The PCR product was digested with HindIII and XbaI (New England Biolabs) and ligated (T4-DNA ligase; Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) into the HindIII and XbaI sites of a promoterless pCAT-Basic vector (Promega, Madison, WI). The resulting construct was designated -1002StAR. Two deletion constructs were generated from -1002StAR by StuI and AccI (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) to generate the -823/+6 (-823StAR) and -257/+6 (-257StAR) constructs, respectively.

Further progressive deletions of the promoter constructs were prepared using the -14/+6 reverse primer and the appropriate 5'- forward primers: -152StAR (5'-GGCCAAGCTTAGTCTGCTCCCTCCCACCTTGGCCAGCACT); -123StAR (5'-GGCCAAGCTTTGCAGGATGAGGCAATCATTCCAT); -96StAR (5'-GGCCAAGCTTTGACCCTCTGCACAATGACTGA); -73StAR (the same oligonucleotide sequence used for the EMSA probe, -73/-42StAR); -51StAR (5'-GGCCAAGCTTATGCACAGCCTTCCACGG).

To generate constructs with point mutations, oligonucleotides containing the point mutations of choice were used for the PCR reaction as the forward primers, using the -14/+6 as the reverse primer (unless stated otherwise): -152mutSF-1 (5'- GGCCAAGCTTAGTCTGCTCCCTCCCAtaTTGGCCAGCACT); -152mut1"Sp-1" (5'-GGCCAAGCTTAGTCTGCTCCCTCtgACCTTGGCCAGCACT); -152mut2"Sp-1" (5'-GGCCAAGCTTAGTCTGCTCCCTggCACCTTGGCCAGCACT); -123mutC/EBPbeta -2 (5'-GGCCAAGCTTTGCAGGATGAGtcccaCATTCCAT); -96mutbeta -2(5'-GGCCAAGCTTTGACCCTCTCtcccaGACTGAT); -96mutbeta -3 (5'-GGCCAAGCTTTGACCCTCTGCACAATGAtctgTGACTT; -96mutGATA (5'-GGCCAAGCTTTGACCCTCTGCACAATGACTGATGACTTTTTTAagTCAAGTG); -73mutGATA (5'- GGCCAAGCTTGACTTTTTTAagTCAAGTGATGATGCACAGCC); The -96rStAR construct was built using the -96StAR primer as the forward primer, and the -53/+6mutStAR (5'-GGCCTCTAGATGATctcgacgtccaggacgcAAGCATTTAAGGCAGAGCACTTGATCTGCGCCACAGCT) as the reverse primer.

The double mutant construct -96doublemut was generated using the -96mutbeta -3 as the forward primer, the -14/+6 oligonucleotide as the reverse primer, and the construct -96mutGATA as the template. PCR reaction (total volume of 100 µl) consisted of 30 cycles at 94 °C (1 min), 60-65 °C (2 min), and 72 °C (3 min) (38).

Western Blot and RT-PCR Analyses-- At the indicated time points, granulosa cells were extracted by lysis buffer (RIPA) and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and electro-blotting procedures as described previously (40). After a 1-h incubation with anti-C/EBPbeta (1:2000) or anti-GATA-4 (1:4000), the nitrocellulose membranes were washed and further incubated for 1 h with the appropriate peroxidase-conjugated antibodies (1:10,000 dilution). Specific signals were detected by chemiluminescence utilizing the LumiGlo substrate (New England Biolabs). Quantitation of chemiluminescence signals on x-ray films was performed as described previously (40).

Total RNA was extracted by dissolving the granulosa cells in 0.5 ml of RNAzol B (Tel-Test, Inc., Friendwood, TX) added to each culture well (16 mm). Further steps followed the manufacturer's instructions. Semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis of total RNA extracts from granulosa cells was performed exactly as described previously (40).

Statistical Analysis-- Student's unpaired two-tailed t test was performed using Microsoft Excel 97 statistical analysis functions. Differences between the activities of the indicated constructs were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Is SF-1 Involved in Regulation of StAR Promoter?-- Aiming to identify the regulatory elements controlling StAR expression, we have applied transient expression assays of the mouse StAR promoter by use of granulosa cells from prepubertal rat ovary. To this end, a -1002 to +6 fragment of the StAR gene was cloned by PCR and ligated to a promoterless pCAT-Basic plasmid. We reasoned that the expression of the mouse promoter in rat cells is justified by the fact that the proximal regions of the rat and mouse promoters are almost identical, in particular through the first 150 base pairs upstream to the transcription start site (Fig. 1). Testing the hormonal inducibility of the promoter constructs was performed following a 6-h incubation with FSH added shortly after transfection by electroporation. Semiquantitative RT-PCR and Western blot analyses confirmed that under similar experimental conditions the levels of StAR mRNA and protein rise acutely upon the addition of FSH (Fig. 2).


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Putative binding sites for trans-acting proteins potentially involved in regulation of the mouse and rat StAR promoter. The -178/+6 region in the murine StAR promoter (30) harbors the following potential recognition sites (boxed) for trans-acting proteins, which were examined in this study: Sp1 (-146/-137), SF-1 (-139/-132, SF-1, Ad4BP), C/EBPbeta -1 (-117/-108), C/EBPbeta -3 (-81/-72), and GATA (-66/-61). Additional SF-1 and C/EBPbeta sites (broken line boxes) were proposed by other investigators: SF-1-a (-102/-95); C/EBPbeta -2 (-90/-81) and SF-1b (-46/-39). A TATA-like element is underlined. Mismatched nucleotides of the rat promoter (72) are indicated by highlighted superscripts.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Time-dependent rise of StAR mRNA and protein induced by FSH. Freshly prepared granulosa cells were seeded to culture and 3 h later, FSH was added (100 ng/ml). At the indicated time points, duplicate wells, were harvested with either RNAzol B or lysis buffer (see "Experimental Procedures"). A, RT-PCR was performed to determine the levels of StAR mRNA as described under "Experimental Procedures." The presented autoradiogram depicts the amplified PCR signals obtained for StAR and the ribosomal protein L19 mRNAs. B, Western blot analysis was performed, and the enhanced chemiluminescence reaction depicts the mitochondrial 30-kDa StAR protein. The lower panel presents the time dependent increase of StAR transcript and protein. Quantitation of StAR mRNA and protein was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures."

At large, the activity values obtained by transfecting a series of progressive deletions of the promoter showed that hormone inducibility remained high in all constructs pruned down to -96/+6 (Fig. 3). The latter region exhibited the highest -fold induction by FSH (44-fold), suggesting that two potential upstream binding sites for SF-1 (-139/-132 and -102/-95), are not necessarily required for the FSH activation of the promoter. These results did not agree with earlier reports, which strongly advocated the notion that SF-1 is implicated in regulation of StAR expression (26-28, 30, 41). This inconsistency, together with the fact that deletion of the -139/-132 SF-1 site significantly reduced the basal activity of -152StAR (Fig. 3), urged us to cautiously reassess the importance of this element by site-directed mutations and EMSAs. To our surprise, SF-1 did not bind to a -148/-127 probe (Fig. 4), previously shown to be capable of SF-1 binding using extracts of Y-1 adrenocortical cell line (30). Instead, the rat cell extracts generated a slower migrating protein complex, which was not affected by antiserum to SF-1 (Fig. 4A, lanes 2 and 4). A closer examination of this sequence revealed a potential Sp1 site, which is overlapping the SF-1 binding element to create an "Sp1"/SF-1 motif (see Fig. 5B, probe 2). This G-rich element (-146, 5'-TGGGAGGGAG, lower strand) is nearly identical to an Sp1-like binding sequence previously reported to be involved in cAMP-dependent regulation of the bovine P450scc transcription (34, 42). In StAR promoter, this Sp1-like site, termed "Sp1," binds a protein that is antigenically cross-reactive with Sp1 antiserum (Fig. 4B, lanes 6 and 8). Moreover, molar excess of Sp1 consensus DNA can compete for the binding of "Sp1" to its site in StAR promoter (Fig. 5A, lanes 4 and 5). Finally, a site-directed mutation replacing GG with ca (Fig. 5B, lane 16) resulted in the loss of "Sp1" band shift and rendered the SF-1 site available for a typical SF-1 binding (Fig. 5B, lane 16). Noteworthy, the "Sp1"/SF-1 element could bind both proteins, providing the extracts were prepared from the mouse MA-10 cells (Fig. 5B, lane 14), which are highly enriched with SF-1 content. These results suggest that the -148/-127 region has a dual capacity to bind both "Sp1"and SF-1, which compete with each other depending on their relative content in a given cell type.


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   5'-Deletion analysis of the -1002/-96 StAR promoter region. Progressive deletions of StAR promoter are schematically illustrated in the left panel. Each vector was transfected by electroporation into E2-primed rat granulosa cells. Cells without hormone treatment (dotted bars) and those treated with 100 ng/ml FSH (solid bars) were incubated for 6 h before extracts were prepared for CAT analysis as described under "Experimental Procedures." CAT activity was determined using 5 µg of protein for a 5-h assay. The results are presented as the mean ± S.E. of percent of [14C]chloramphenicol converted to the acetylated products. Hatched bars represent the FSH -fold induction above basal activity. Multiple independent transfections (n) were performed for each construct. Activity levels were statistically significant when compared with the respective values obtained for the -1002StAR construct: a, p < 0.05; b, p < 0.001; b* denotes statistically different values when compared with the corresponding activities of the -152StAR construct (p < 0.001).


View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   SF-1 does not bind the -148/-127 StAR promoter region. Extracts prepared from PMSG/hCG-treated rats (see "Experimental Procedures") were used for the following electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs): A, antiserum to SF-1 (4 µg) was added to protein extracts for a 25 min preincubation period prior to addition of either a 32P-labeled -148/-127 probe (lane 2), or a positive control SF-1 probe, designated SCC1 (lane 4) (32). Further EMSA procedure was performed according to the protocol described under "Experimental Procedures." B, antiserum to Sp1 was preincubated with the protein extract prior to assay with labeled -148/-127 probe (lane 6) or a consensus Sp1 (Cons. Sp1) probe (lane 8). The corresponding DNA-protein complexes formed in the absence of the antisera are depicted in lanes 1, 3, 5, and 7.


View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   -148/-127 StAR promoter region binds an Sp1-like ("Sp1") protein. Panels A and B include EMSA performed as described in Fig. 4 by use of the following 32P-labeled probes: consensus Sp1 binding site (Cons. Sp1 (1); -148/-127 (2); an SF-1 binding site, SCC1(SF-1) (3); a mutated -148/-127 probe designated mut2"Sp1" (4). A, an ovarian extract from PMSG/hCG-treated rats was used as a source for DNA-binding proteins. Lanes 1-3 depict a competition experiment using unlabeled self-competitor -148/-127 DNA, lanes 4 and 5 examine the ability of molar excess of unlabeled consensus Sp1 DNA (Cons. Sp1) to compete for the labeled -148/-127 probe, and lanes 6-10 examine reciprocal competitions using a labeled consensus Sp1 binding site probe. B, lane 11 depicts an Sp1 binding to a consensus Sp1 probe. Lanes 12 and 13 show the formation of an "Sp1" complex when a -148/-127 probe was incubated with either a rat, or a mouse ovarian extract, respectively. The same -148/-127 probe yielded both SF-1 and "Sp1" bands when tested with an extract of mouse MA-10 Leydig cell line (lane 14). Lane 15 demonstrates a typical SF-1 binding to its consensus motif (SCC1). Lane 16 depicts the effect of mutating the -148/-127 probe to mut2"Sp1" (probe 4).

The apparent cooperativity of Sp1 and SF-1 in mediating cAMP-driven expression of steroidogenic genes (34, 42) could have suggested that a similar concept might be functionally relevant for FSH induction of StAR. Therefore, CAT reporter transgenes containing point mutations in the -132/-146 region were created in the context of -152StAR, as an alternative approach for the deletion strategy described before. The results in Fig. 6 show that a 5'-CAAGGTGG mutation to 5'-CAAtaTGG (-152mutSF-1), did not affect the response of StAR promoter to hormones, but instead improved it. The same mutation was previously shown to ablate SF-1 binding and transcriptional activation of the P450scc and P450aromatase promoters (31, 32). The notion that binding of SF-1 is irrelevant for transcriptional activation of StAR was further strengthened by the fact that a mutant of the "Sp1" site (-152mut2"Sp1"), which capacitated SF-1 binding (Fig. 5, lane 16), did not improve any of the construct performances (Fig. 6). Finally, when the "Sp1" site was mutated (-152mut1"Sp1"), as previously done to critically impaired its activity when harboring the bovine P450scc promoter (42), no significant loss of hormonal inducibility or basal activity were noticed (Fig. 6).


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Site-directed mutations of the "Sp1"/SF-1 site do not affect the hormonal activation of StAR-CAT. PCR-based mutations were created within the context of -152/+6 of StAR, and ligated to pCAT-Basic (-152StAR). Mutated sequences of the "Sp1" (superscript dotted line) and the SF-1 (underline) motifs are indicated by lowercase letters. Transient expression was conducted in the absence or the presence of FSH as described in Fig. 3. Hatched bars represent the FSH -fold induction above basal activity. CAT activity was determined using 5 µg of protein for a 2-h assay. The results are presented as the mean ± S.E. of percentage of [14C]chloramphenicol converted to its acetylated products. Three independent electroporations were conducted with these constructs. a, p < 0.05 when compared with the basal activity value of -152StAR. The rest of the data were not statistically different.

FSH Responsiveness Is Determined by the -93/-51 Region: A Role for C/EBPbeta -- Further 5' deletions of StAR promoter finally resulted in a severe loss of FSH responsiveness. Fig. 7 shows that the -73/+6 and -51/+6 CAT constructs retained only 12% and 0.3% of the FSH-driven activity exhibited by the -96/+6 construct. To verify that no additional sequences located downstream to -51 are potentially involved in hormonal regulation of this promoter, we have randomized 17 base pairs constituting the -49/-33 region. Clearly, this mutation performed within the context of the -96/+6 construct did not affect its activity (Fig. 7), suggesting that no important elements reside immediately upstream to the TATA box.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Functional analysis of the -96/-51 StAR promoter region. Progressive deletions of -96StAR promoter sequence are schematically illustrated in the left panel. The bottom construct depicts the mutated -96rStAR, in which the 17 bases -49/-33 were randomized. Transient expression of the constructs in cells treated with or without FSH were performed as described in Fig. 3. CAT activities were determined using 5 µg of protein for a 5-h assay. The results are presented as the mean ± S.E. of percentage of [14C]chloramphenicol converted to the acetylated products. Hatched bars represent the FSH -fold induction above basal activity. Multiple independent transfections (n) were performed for each construct. Activity levels were statistically significant when compared with the respective values obtained for the -96StAR construct: a, p < 0.05; b, p < 0.005; c, p < 0.001.

Sequence analysis of the -96/-51 region depicts a putative near-consensus C/EBPbeta site (C/EBPbeta -2), residing upstream to a conserved consensus GATA binding motif (Fig. 1). To test if the C/EBPbeta -2 site may have a regulatory role in the rat granulosa cells, we mutated this site in the context of -96StAR, as shown in Fig. 8. However, the mutated construct (-96mutbeta -2) did not affect its 55-fold response to FSH, which was not much different from the parental plasmid (Fig. 8). Further EMSA studies provided an explanation for this observation by showing that a specific C/EBPbeta -2 probe (-96/-75) did not bind to any protein (data not shown). Instead, a downstream adjacent element reminiscent of an AP-1 site, if anything else (5'-TGACTGA), was found capable of C/EBPbeta binding. We designated this non-consensus element C/EBPbeta -3 (see Fig. 1). EMSAs showed that a C/EBPbeta -3 oligonucleotide probe (-87/-70) binds C/EBPbeta in a specific fashion; antiserum to C/EBPbeta caused a supershift and ablation of the typical triplet bands bound to C/EBPbeta DNA (Fig. 9, lanes 1 and 3), and a specific antiserum to C/EBPalpha supershifted the upper band, suggesting that it consists of C/EBPalpha /C/EBPbeta heterodimer (Fig. 9, lane 2). Finally, three sera served for negative controls, including antiserum to sterol-responsive element-binding protein (SREBP, Fig. 9, lanes 5 and 6), previously shown to activate StAR transcription in human granulosa cells (29), and ineffective antisera to c-Fos and c-Jun (Fig. 9, lanes 8 and 9).


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Recognition elements for C/EBPbeta and GATA-4 binding confer transcriptional activation to StAR promoter. The left panel illustrates a series of -96StAR constructs including mutated sequences (lowercase letters) for binding of either C/EBP proteins (-96mutbeta -2, -96mutbeta -3), or the GATA factors (-96mutGATA). Additionally, double-mutated constructs were prepared as either -96double mut, or -73mutGATA. Transfection and activity assays were conducted as described in Fig. 3. The results are presented as the mean ± S.E. of percentage of [14C]chloramphenicol converted to the acetylated products. Hatched bars represent the FSH -fold induction above basal activity. Multiple independent transfections (n) were performed for each construct. Activity levels were statistically significant when compared with the respective values obtained for the -96StAR construct: a, p < 0.05; b, p < 0.01; c, p < 0.001.


View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   The -87/-70 StAR promoter region binds C/EBPbeta proteins. A, electrophoretic mobility shift assays using PMSG/hCG ovary extract were performed as described in Fig. 4 using a -87/-70 32P-labeled probe (lanes 1-15). The formation of the three DNA-protein complexes (arrows, lanes 1 and 4) was examined in the presence of the following antisera: C/EBPalpha (lane 2), C/EBPbeta (lanes 3 and 7), sterol-responsive element-binding protein, SREBP (lane 5 and 6), c-Fos (lane 8), and c-Jun (lane 9). B, competition studies using the 32P- -87/-70 as a probe (lane 11) and molar excess of unlabeled self-competitor DNA (lanes 12 and 13), or unlabeled C/EBPbeta -1 DNA (lanes 14 and 15). Lane 16 demonstrates lack of binding to a mutated C/EBPbeta -3 labeled probe. C, characterization of C/EBPbeta binding to a C/EBPbeta -1 probe (-125/-100) was performed in the presence of either an antiserum to C/EBPbeta (2 µg, lane 19), or anti-SF-1 serum as a negative control (4 µg, lane 18).

Despite the fact that the sequence of C/EBPbeta -3 site (TGACTGATGA) is so remotely different from a consensus C/EBPbeta motif, it is absolutely required for C/EBPbeta binding, which was lost upon a TGAtctgTGA mutation of the probe (Fig. 9B, lane 16). Yet, as could be expected, the C/EBPbeta -3 motif does not necessarily exhibit the best affinity for C/EBPbeta binding, as we learn from competitive EMSAs mixing a 32P-C/EBPbeta -3 probe (-87/-70) with a 10-100-fold molar excess of the near-consensus C/EBPbeta -1 sequence (-125/-100); in doing so, a 10-fold excess of C/EBPbeta -1 was enough to displace 90% of the labeled C/EBPbeta -3 probe (Fig. 9, lane 14). The reason for using the C/EBPbeta -1 sequence for competitor DNA lies in the curious fact that its motif (ATGAGGCAAT) specifically binds immuno-cross-reactive C/EBPbeta (Fig. 9C). However, mutating or deleting the C/EBPbeta -1 site does not impair transcriptional activation of the StAR promoter (Fig. 3, bottom two constructs). By contrast, functional analysis of the C/EBPbeta -3 sequence by site-directed mutagenesis (Fig. 8, -96mutbeta -3) suggested that an intact C/EBPbeta -3 site is, indeed, required for the activity of StAR promoter.

The Role of GATA-4-- However, the moderate attenuating effect caused by mutating the C/EBPbeta -3 site could not account for the severely impaired activity of the -51StAR construct (Fig. 3). Therefore, the involvement of an additional regulatory element downstream of C/EBPbeta -3 was likely to be found. To test this possibility, we examined the candidacy of a perfect GATA binding site located at -61/-66 (Fig. 1). Like -96mutbeta -3, modification at this GATA site (-96mutGATA) resulted in no more than a partial attenuation of the construct activity (Fig. 8). However, double mutation of both C/EBPbeta -3 and GATA sites (-96doublemut) resulted in a nearly complete loss of CAT activity (Fig. 8). A similar marked impairment of the FSH responsiveness was also observed when the GATA site was mutated in the context of -73mutGATA, from which the C/EBPbeta -3 motif was deleted. In our view, the residual but not negligible FSH -fold induction observed in cells transfected with the double-mutated construct (-96double mut) is probably meaningless and reflects a pleiotropic effect FSH has on the basal activity by acting as a trophic hormone. In fact, the activity performances of the double mutant were similar to those obtained for the maximally trimmed promoter construct -51StAR, which also exhibited a significant 5-fold induction of CAT activity by FSH (Fig. 7). However, this trophic improvement of the basal activity was no higher than 3% of the FSH activity measured for the parental -96StAR construct (Fig. 7) and, therefore, could not represent other than a misleading basal activity

Fig. 10 shows a single protein complex labeled by either of the two DNA probes, -73/-42, or -73/+6 (Fig. 10, A and B, respectively). These results convince that no other protein complexes can bind to the entire region residing between -73 and +6. The binding specificity was demonstrated by use of antiserum to GATA-4, which ablated and supershifted the DNA-protein complex. The latter remained unaffected in the presence of anti-GATA-6 serum (Fig. 10A, lanes 1 and 2). Additionally, mutating the GATA site in the context of the -73/+6 probe (5'-TTATCT right-arrow 5'-TTAagT) associated with loss of binding capacities, as evident by competition (Fig. 10B, lanes 7 and 8) and direct binding studies using radiolabeled probe (Fig. 10B, lane 9).


View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   The -66/-61 GATA element binds a GATA-4 protein. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays using a PMSG/hCG ovary extract were performed as described in Fig. 4 using a -73/-42, -73/+6, or a -73/+6mutGATA as labeled DNA probes. A, antiserum to either GATA-4 (2 µg, lane 2) or GATA-6 (2 µg, lane 3) was added to the protein extracts 25 min prior to assay. B, competition for GATA-4 binding (lane 4) was assessed in the presence of molar excess of unlabeled self competitor DNA (lanes 5 and 6), or an unlabeled -73/+6mutGATA probe (lanes 7 and 8). Lane 9 tests the capacity of the latter mutated probe to complex with proteins of the ovarian extract.

Granulosa Cell Expression of C/EBPbeta and GATA-4-- We also aimed to study by Western blot analysis the levels of C/EBPbeta and GATA-4 proteins in our tissue and cell preparations. First, we tested granulosa cell extracts prepared at identical time points previously used for determination of CAT activity. Fig. 11A shows that the C/EBPbeta antiserum cross-reacted with three protein bands of 45, 39, and 22 kDa, known as C/EBPbeta isoforms (43). The levels of those proteins were barely detectable in vivo (t0), but seeding the cells for a few hours in culture substantially elevated the levels of the higher molecular weight forms. The 22-kDa isoform of C/EBPbeta was not affected by seeding to culture (Fig. 11A). A 6-h treatment with FSH generated an increase of all the isoforms of C/EBPbeta up to 7-fold. In agreement with our EMSAs (Fig. 9A), Western blot analysis of the ovarian cells detected C/EBPalpha protein bands (data not shown), which were also reported by earlier studies of these proteins during follicular development (44).


View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11.   Effect of seeding and FSH treatment on expression of C/EBPbeta and GATA-4 proteins. Except for electroporation, granulosa cells from E2-primed immature rats were prepared for culture exactly as described in Fig. 3. Protein extracts were prepared from cells prior to seeding (t0), or after a 9-h incubation (post-seeding) in the absence of FSH. FSH treatment commenced 3 h after seeding and cells were harvested 6 h later. SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures" using 40 µg of protein/lane. Chemiluminescent detection of the reactive proteins was performed using antisera to C/EBPbeta (A) or GATA-4 (B). The antiserum to C/EBPbeta detects three major isoforms, designated LAP-I, LAP-II, and LIP (43). The lower panel presents a semiquantitative analysis of the data shown in A and B. C, demonstration of C/EBPbeta and GATA-4 proteins in ovarian extracts prepared from the PMSG/hCG-treated rats.

By contrast to the profile of C/EBPbeta expression, neither seeding nor FSH treatment had any effect on the high level of the GATA-4 content, which is probably constitutively expressed in the rat granulosa cells (Fig. 11B). It should be noted that, in correlation to our EMSA data, we could not detect the GATA-6 protein by this Western blot analysis (data not shown). Fig. 11C shows that the C/EBPbeta and GATA-4 proteins also exist at high levels in the ovarian extracts we selected, for practical reasons, as a source for our EMSAs. Those extracts were expected to express the necessary factors since StAR expression during the post-hCG period is in its prime response (40).

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The objective of the present study was to reveal the principal sequence elements that render the promoter of StAR gene responsive to FSH in cells of the rodent ovary. Based on previously published sequence (30), we cloned a -1002 to +6 fragment of the 5'-flanking region of the mouse StAR gene and placed it upstream of CAT gene in a promoterless pCAT-Basic reporter plasmid. Then, by contrast to most of the previous StAR studies expressing promoter-reporter plasmids in established cell lines (26-30, 41), we conducted our functional assays using primary naive granulosa cells from prepubertal rats. Following electroporation of these cells in the presence of plasmid DNA, a 6-h incubation in culture resulted in a robust activation (up to 50-fold) of the promoter by FSH. Having such a sensitive assay in hand, we combined a progressive deletion strategy with site directed mutations aiming to validate, or eliminate, the potential involvement of candidate cis-acting regulatory elements in StAR expression. This approach led us to identification of two novel elements, C/EBPbeta and GATA-4, which were never known before to be required for transcriptional activation of genes encoding steroidogenic proteins.

High responsiveness to FSH still remained if the promoter was pruned down to position -96 from the transcription start site. However, we were interested in performing a limited analysis upstream of the -96 regions, in particular addressing those sites that were previously suggested to be functionally involved in regulation of StAR expression. For example, between -100 and -1000 of the StAR promoter reside at least two putative binding sites for the tissue-specific orphan receptor SF-1 (45), also known as Ad4BP (24). This factor is required for activation of many genes expressed in steroidogenic tissues (23). Therefore, a host of studies have recently proposed that SF-1 is also essential for expression of StAR gene (26-30, 41). Using the naive granulosa cell model, our findings do not support this notion since the removal of all putative SF-1 sites (28, 30) hardly affected the promoter performance (-96StAR and -96rStAR, Figs. 2 and 7, respectively). A possible explanation for the apparent discrepancy between the present findings and earlier works may reflect species-dependent differences between the human (26) and the murine (30) promoters. However, one cannot exclude the possibility that the StAR promoter was never examined in steroidogenically committed primary cells which contain normal levels of SF-1. Instead, the role of SF-1 was demonstrated in luteal cells (27, 46) and steroidogenic cell lines expressing exceptionally high endogenous levels of the orphan receptor (30, 41), or by use of non-steroidogenic cells overexpressing transfected SF-1 plasmids (26-29, 41). Therefore, the role of SF-1 was always examined under conditions favoring its interaction with StAR promoter, but did not necessarily simulate the physiologically compatible requirements for regulation of StAR in normal cells.

Upstream of position -96 in the mouse promoter resides an additional element of considerable interest, i.e. a non-consensus putative binding site for Sp1 (-137/-146). A similar sequence for binding of an Sp1-like protein ("Sp1") was found important for cAMP induced transcription of the bovine P450scc gene (42). Moreover, an analogous Sp1 site seemed to be important for activation of the human StAR promoter (26). In rodents, however, this "Sp1" element is overlapping a well studied SF-1 binding motif, thus creating a mixed "Sp1"/SF-1 site. This composite sequence can bind SF-1 from Y-1 (30) or MA-10 cells (Fig. 4B), but is apparently incapable of doing so when tested with granulosa cell extracts. We may, therefore, conclude that "Sp1" and SF-1 compete for binding to this site, so that SF-1 band shift in EMSAs is demonstrable only in cell lines expressing extremely high levels of SF-1, as discussed above. However, at present it is not clear if activation of the StAR promoter in granulosa cells involves "Sp1" action, since removal of the "Sp1"/SF-1 site down to position -123 attenuated the basal activity, but retained the hormonal responsiveness intact. Interestingly, further pruning of the promoter down to -96 kept suppressing the basal activity of the promoter by removing a near-consensus C/EBPbeta (C/EBPbeta -1) binding moiety at -116/-107. Thus, the C/EBPbeta -1 site is irrelevant for activation of the promoter despite its apparent excellence in binding typical C/EBPbeta proteins (Fig. 9). Collectively, these results have suggested that the critical element(s) controlling the inducibility of StAR promoter must have resided further downstream, within the first 80-90 base pairs of the promoter.

Indeed, deletion mutants and site-directed mutation within the -87 to -51 region revealed the involvement of trans-acting proteins that bind two sites located 10 base pairs apart: an upstream sequence interacting with C/EBPbeta (C/EBPbeta -3) and a consensus site specifically binding a GATA-4 protein. Contrary to our earlier expectations, the sequence core subserving for C/EBPbeta binding (TGACTGA) seemed more like an AP-1 site, so that a typical c-Jun/c-Fos binding was demonstrable upon a single base substitution to TGACTcA (data not shown). Even more confusing was the fact that overlapping with this odd C/EBPbeta -3 site resides another putative recognition element for C/EBPbeta , designated C/EBPbeta -2. However, mutating the core sequence of C/EBPbeta -2 (ACAAT to tccca) did not affect the inducibility of the -96StAR construct, while a four-base mutation of C/EBPbeta -3 reduced the basal and FSH-responsive activity by 50%. This shy effect of the mutated C/EBPbeta -3 did not impress much until after the elucidation of the GATA binding site at -66/-61. Mutation of the GATA site resulted in a 45% drop of the promoter activity, but a double mutation of both GATA-4 and C/EBPbeta -3 resulted in a dramatic 97% loss of the construct activity. These results suggest that a concurrent binding of the two regulatory proteins is required for activation of StAR promoter.

The present study shows that the prepubertal granulosa cells already express GATA-4 in vivo, and the level of this protein remained unaffected under any culture manipulations. By contrast, the C/EBPbeta proteins are absent in vivo, but their expression in culture was markedly promoted by FSH. A similar induction of C/EBPbeta expression was recently documented in testicular Leydig cells responding to cAMP (47). These results suggest that the level of C/EBPbeta might determine the rate-limiting regulatory switch of StAR transcription, while the constitutively expressed GATA-4 plays an essential, yet more permissive role for that matter. It is noteworthy that, other than StAR, members of the C/EBP family have been described as regulators of acute responses, such as the control of certain inflammatory functions (48). Moreover, the suggested involvement of C/EBP proteins in the acute response of StAR to cAMP (8, 20) and trophic hormones (40, 49, 50) is also well accepted in light of a well studied example where C/EBP plays a critical role in transcriptional regulation of the phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) gene (51). Similar to the emerging scenario in StAR promoter, it has been shown that cAMP and probably protein kinase A drive PEPCK transcription via a complex interactions of C/EBP with other activators and co-activators (51); also, the binding of C/EBPbeta to a non-consensus recognition motif in the StAR promoter is reminiscent of the C/EBP binding to non-dyad-symmetric sequences in the PEPCK promoter, a cyclic AMP-responsive element-like site (52) and a site termed P3(I) (53).

Our EMSAs showed that the C/EBPbeta -1 and C/EBPbeta -3 probes formed three DNA-protein complexes, which were identical to those obtained when binding capacities of rat granulosa cell extracts were previously examined with a C/EBPbeta motif located in the hormone-inducible prostaglandin synthase-2 promoter (54). The alternative approach testing the potential cross-reactivity of the C/EBPbeta proteins with specific antibodies tested by Western blot analysis revealed that the rat granulosa cells express three isoforms, previously identified as liver-enriched activating proteins (LAPs) and liver-enriched inhibiting protein (LIP) (43, 55). Clearly, LIP and LAP-I were markedly elevated as a result of FSH treatment, while LAP-II level rose by merely seeding the cells into culture. Therefore, it is conceivable to propose that the onset of StAR transcription is controlled by a two-step mechanism: first, the seeding-induced rise of LAP-II capacitates the immediate response of the granulosa cells to FSH, and a follow-up activation of the promoter may proceed thanks to the hormone-elevated levels of LAP-I. The likelihood of such a mechanism is not too speculative since the granulosa cells express high levels of FSH-activated cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein (56, 57), which in turn, is known to up-regulate LAP transcription (58, 59). Further studies should address this hypothesis and reveal even more about the potential involvement of the C/EBPbeta isoforms in regulation of StAR expression. Also, it is not unlikely that other C/EBP proteins, such as C/EBPalpha , can interact with the -87/-70StAR site. If truly so, C/EBPalpha should be considered as potential substitute for C/EBPbeta in the C/EBPbeta -deficient mouse ovary (60-63). It has been shown that the ovaries of the latter null mice do not ovulate (60, 64) despite normal production of gonadal steroids and expression of steroidogenic enzymes, probably including StAR.3

Like C/EBPbeta , GATA-4 had not been described previously as a potential regulator of genes encoding steroidogenic enzymes, or their accessory proteins. Gata4-null mice die in utero by 9.5 days postcoitum (65, 66). However, recent studies have suggested that this transcription factor is involved in control of gonadal development and sex differentiation in rodents (67-69). Moreover, in adult mouse tissues, high levels of GATA-4 are observed in the ovary, testis, and heart. Interestingly, little or no GATA-4 protein was found in the cells of the mouse corpus luteum (68), which do express record levels of StAR (20, 40, 70, 71). One way to reconcile this apparent inconstancy is provided by assuming that the role of GATA-4 during follicular phase could be fulfilled by another member of this family, like GATA-6, which is highly abundant in the corpus luteum (68). Alternatively, we may propose that the mode of StAR expression in the corpus luteum may not necessarily resemble its regulatory pattern in granulosa cells of the follicular phase. Accordingly, SF-1, which is extremely high in the corpus luteum may control the gland expression of StAR expression after all. This tempting speculation implies that activation of StAR transcription may be achieved by more than one set of cis-acting proteins, depending on the origin of the cells and tissue under study. In this regard, the present findings raise the question: what tissue-specific factor(s) can potentially replace SF-1 in our steroidogenically committed, but yet undifferentiated cell model? Alternative experimental approaches addressing this challenging question are currently under study.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Jonathan Arensburg for excellent technical assistance and many helpful discussions.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Israel Science Foundation Grant 547/97.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: orly{at}vms.huji.ac.il.

2 Y. Arensburg and J. Orly, unpublished data.

3 E. Sterneck, personal communication.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: P450scc, cholesterol side chain cleavage cytochrome P450; StAR, steroidogenic acute regulatory protein; SF-1, steroidogenic factor-1; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RT, reverse transcription; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; PEPCK, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; hCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; PMSG, pregnant mare serum gonadotropin; FSH, follitropin.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
  1. Hall, P. F. (1986) Steroids 48, 131-196[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Simpson, E. R., and Waterman, M. R. (1988) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 50, 427-440[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Miller, W. L. (1995) J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 55, 607-616[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Simpson, E. R., McCarthy, J. L., and Peterson, J. A. (1978) J. Biol. Chem. 253, 3135-3139[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Crivello, J. F., and Jefcoate, C. R. (1980) J. Biol. Chem. 255, 8144-8151[Free Full Text]
  6. Jefcoate, C. R., DiBartolomeis, M. J., Williams, C. A., and McNamara, B. C. (1987) J. Steroid Biochem. 27, 721-729[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Stevens, V. L., Xu, T., and Lambeth, J. D. (1993) Eur. J. Biochem. 216, 557-563[Abstract]
  8. Clark, B. J., Wells, J., King, S. R., and Stocco, D. M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 28314-28322[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Wang, X., Liu, Z., Eimerl, S., Timberg, R., Weiss, A. M., Orly, J., and Stocco, D. M. (1998) Endocrinology 139, 3903-3912[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Stocco, D. M., and Clark, B. J. (1996) Endocr. Rev. 17, 221-244[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Stocco, D. M. (1997) Biol. Reprod. 56, 328-336[Abstract]
  12. Stocco, D. M., and Clark, B. J. (1997) Steroids 62, 29-36[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Lin, D., Sugawara, T., Strauss, J. F., III, Clark, B. J., Stocco, D. M., Saenger, P., Rogol, A., and Miller, W. L. (1995) Science 267, 1828-1831[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Caron, K. M., Soo, S. C., Wetsel, W. C., Stocco, D. M., Clark, B. J., and Parker, K. L. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 11540-11545[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Furukawa, A., Miyatake, A., Ohnishi, T., and Ichikawa, Y. (1998) J. Neurochem. 71, 2231-2238[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Watari, H., Arakane, F., Moog, L. C., Kallen, C. B., Tomasetto, C., Gerton, G. L., Rio, M. C., Baker, M. E., and Strauss, J. F., III (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 8462-8467[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Bose, H. S., Sugawara, T., Strauss, J. F., III, and Miller, W. L. (1996) N. Engl. J. Med. 335, 1870-1878[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Pon, L. A., Hartigan, J. A., and Orme-Johnson, N. R. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 13309-13316[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Stocco, D. M., and Sodeman, T. C. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 19731-19738[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Clark, B. J., Soo, S. C., Caron, K. M., Ikeda, Y., Parker, K. L., and Stocco, D. M. (1995) Mol. Endocrinol. 9, 1346-1355[Abstract]
  21. Cherradi, N., Rossier, M. F., Vallotton, M. B., Timberg, R., Friedberg, I., Orly, J., Wang, X. J., Stocco, D. M., and Capponi, A. M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 7899-7907[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Cherradi, N., Brandenburger, Y., Rossier, M. F., Vallotton, M. B., Stocco, D. M., and Capponi, A. M. (1998) Mol. Endocrinol. 12, 962-972[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Parker, K. L., and Schimmer, B. P. (1997) Endocr. Rev. 18, 361-377[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Honda, S., Morohashi, K., Nomura, M., Takeya, H., Kitajima, M., and Omura, T. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 7494-7502[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Sugawara, T., Lin, D., Holt, J. A., Martin, K. O., Javitt, N. B., Miller, W. L., and Strauss, J. F., III (1995) Biochemistry 34, 12506-12512[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Sugawara, T., Holt, J. A., Kiriakidou, M., and Strauss, J. F., III (1996) Biochemistry 35, 9052-9059[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Sugawara, T., Kiriakidou, M., McAllister, J. M., Kallen, C. B., and Strauss, J. F., III (1997) Biochemistry 36, 7249-7255[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Sandhoff, T. W., Hales, D. B., Hales, K. H., and McLean, M. P. (1998) Endocrinology 139, 4820-4831[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Christenson, L. K., McAllister, J. M., Martin, K. O., Javitt, N. B., Osborne, T. F., and Strauss, J. F., III (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 30729-30735[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Caron, K. M., Ikeda, Y., Soo, S. C., Stocco, D. M., Parker, K. L., and Clark, B. J. (1997) Mol. Endocrinol. 11, 138-147[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Fitzpatrick, S. L., and Richards, J. S. (1993) Mol. Endocrinol. 7, 341-354[Abstract]
  32. Clemens, J. W., Lala, D. S., Parker, K. L., and Richards, J. S. (1994) Endocrinology 134, 1499-1508[Abstract]
  33. Carlone, D. L., and Richards, J. S. (1997) Mol. Endocrinol. 11, 292-304[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Liu, Z., and Simpson, E. R. (1997) Mol. Endocrinol. 11, 127-137[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Orly, J., Clemens, J. W., Singer, O., and Richards, J. S. (1996) Biol. Reprod. 54, 208-218[Abstract]
  36. Zor, T., and Selinger, Z. (1996) Anal. Biochem. 236, 302-308[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Welte, T., Garimorth, K., Philipp, S., and Doppler, W. (1994) Mol. Endocrinol. 8, 1091-1102[Abstract]
  38. Orly, J., Rei, Z., Greenberg, N. M., and Richards, J. S. (1994) Endocrinology 134, 2336-2346[Abstract]
  39. Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A., and Struhl, K. (1988) Current Protocols In Molecular Biology, 1st Ed., Greene Publishing Associates/Wiley-Interscience, New York
  40. Ronen, F. T., Timberg, R., King, S. R., Hales, K. H., Hales, D. B., Stocco, D. M., and Orly, J. (1998) Endocrinology 139, 303-315[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Sugawara, T., Kiriakidou, M., McAllister, J. M., Holt, J. A., Arakane, F., and Strauss, J. F., III (1997) Steroids 62, 5-9[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Venepally, P., and Waterman, M. R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 25402-25410[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Raught, B., Liao, W. S., and Rosen, J. M. (1995) Mol. Endocrinol. 9, 1223-1232[Abstract]
  44. Piontkewitz, Y., Enerback, S., and Hedin, L. (1993) Endocrinology 133, 2327-33[Abstract]
  45. Parker, K. L. (1998) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 140, 59-63[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. LaVoie, H. A., Garmey, J. C., and Veldhuis, J. D. (1999) Endocrinology 140, 146-53[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Nalbant, D., Williams, S. C., Stocco, D. M., and Khan, S. A. (1998) Endocrinology 139, 272-279[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Poli, V. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 29279-29282[Free Full Text]
  49. Luo, L., Chen, H., Stocco, D. M., and Zirkin, B. R. (1998) Biol. Reprod. 59, 263-270[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Pescador, N., Houde, A., Stocco, D. M., and Murphy, B. D. (1997) Biol. Reprod. 57, 660-668[Abstract]
  51. Croniger, C., Leahy, P., Reshef, L., and Hanson, R. W. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 31629-31632[Free Full Text]
  52. Liu, J. S., Park, E. A., Gurney, A. L., Roesler, W. J., and Hanson, R. W. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 19095-19102[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Patel, Y. M., Yun, J. S., Liu, J., McGrane, M. M., and Hanson, R. W. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 5619-5628[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Sirois, J., and Richards, J. S. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 21931-21938[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Descombes, P., and Schibler, U. (1991) Cell 67, 569-579[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. Carlone, D. L., and Richards, J. S. (1997) J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 61, 223-231[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  57. Pelletier, N., Boudreau, F., Yu, S. J., Zannoni, S., Boulanger, V., and Asselin, C. (1998) FEBS Lett. 439, 275-280[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  58. Niehof, M., Manns, M. P., and Trautwein, C. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 3600-3613[Abstract]
  59. Berrier, A., Siu, G., and Calame, K. (1998) J. Immunol. 161, 2267-2275[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Sterneck, E., Tessarollo, L., and Johnson, P. F. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 2153-2162[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Croniger, C., Trus, M., Lysek, S. K., Cohen, H., Liu, Y., Darlington, G. J., Poli, V., Hanson, R. W., and Reshef, L. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 26306-26312[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Screpanti, I., Romani, L., Musiani, P., Modesti, A., Fattori, E., Lazzaro, D., Sellitto, C., Scarpa, S., Bellavia, D., Lattanzio, G., Bistoni, F., Frati, L., Cortese, R., Gulino, A., Ciliberto, G., Costantini, F., and Poli, V. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 1932-1941[Abstract]
  63. Tanaka, T., Yoshida, N., Kishimoto, T., and Akira, S. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 7432-7443[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Pall, M., Hellberg, P., Brannstrom, M., Mikuni, M., Peterson, C. M., Sundfeldt, K., Norden, B., Hedin, L., and Enerback, S. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 5273-9[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Narita, N., Bielinska, M., and Wilson, D. B. (1997) Dev. Biol. 189, 270-274[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  66. Narita, N., Bielinska, M., and Wilson, D. B. (1997) Development 124, 3755-3764[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  67. Viger, R. S., Mertineit, C., Trasler, J. M., and Nemer, M. (1998) Development 125, 2665-2675[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Heikinheimo, M., Ermolaeva, M., Bielinska, M., Rahman, N. A., Narita, N., Huhtaniemi, I. T., Tapanainen, J. S., and Wilson, D. B. (1997) Endocrinology 138, 3505-3514[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Heikinheimo, M., Scandrett, J. M., and Wilson, D. B. (1994) Dev. Biol. 164, 361-373[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  70. Juengel, J. L., Meberg, B. M., Turzillo, A. M., Nett, T. M., and Niswender, G. D. (1995) Endocrinology 136, 5423-5429[Abstract]
  71. Pescador, N., Soumano, K., Stocco, D. M., Price, C. A., and Murphy, B. D. (1996) Biol. Reprod. 55, 485-491[Abstract]
  72. Ariyoshi, N., Kim, Y. C., Artemenko, I., Bhattacharyya, K. K., and Jefcoate, C. R. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 7610-7619[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.