Protection against Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus Infection Induced by a Reduced Peptide Bond Analogue of the H-2Db-restricted CD8+ T Cell Epitope GP33*

Christine StemmerDagger , Anne Quesnel§, Armelle Prévost-Blondel, Christine Zimmermann, Sylviane Muller§, Jean-Paul Briand§, and Hanspeter Pircherparallel

From the Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Department of Immunology, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany and the § Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, UPR 9021 CNRS, 67000 Strasbourg, France

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
References

Recent investigations have suggested that pseudopeptides containing modified peptide bonds might advantageously replace natural peptides in therapeutic strategies. We have generated eight reduced peptide bond Psi (CH2-NH) analogues corresponding to the H-2Db-restricted CD8+ T cell epitope (called GP33) of the glycoprotein of the lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus. One of these pseudopeptides, containing a reduced peptide bond between residues 6 and 7 (Psi (6-7)), displayed very similar properties of binding to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and recognition by T cell receptor transgenic T cells specific for GP33 when compared with the parent peptide. We assessed in vitro and in vivo the proteolytic resistance of GP33 and Psi (6-7) and analyzed its contribution to the priming properties of these peptides. The Psi (6-7) analogue exhibited a dramatically increased proteolytic resistance when compared with GP33, and we show for the first time that MHC-peptide complexes formed in vivo with a pseudopeptide display a sustained half-life compared with the complexes formed with the natural peptide. Furthermore, in contrast to immunizations with GP33, three injections of Psi (6-7) in saline induced significant antiviral protection in mice. The enhanced ability of Psi (6-7) to induce antiviral protection may result from the higher stability of the analogue and/or of the MHC-analogue complexes.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
References

T cells recognize antigenic peptides in association with MHC1 molecules and play a key role in protection against harmful pathogens and in tumor elimination. Over the past years many attempts have been made to use synthetic peptides as potential vaccines and immunoregulatory agents (1, 2). Recent studies have provided evidence that pseudopeptides, in which one or several of the natural amide bonds (CO-NH) are replaced by CO-NH isosters (3), can have enhanced antigenic and immunogenic properties (4-6). Most interestingly, it has been shown that such peptide analogues can bind to class I and II MHC molecules (7-13), and some of them also induce differential effects on T cell responsiveness (14) similar to those described with altered peptide ligands, which contain single amino acid replacements (15). These several recent studies thus demonstrated the potential interest of pseudopeptides as possible therapeutic strategies in T cell-mediated disorders.

The high susceptibility of synthetic peptides to proteases is considered to be a major drawback for their use as vaccines or immunoregulatory molecules (16). We have previously shown that several pseudopeptides with enhanced antigenic activity are more resistant to proteolytic degradation in vitro (5, 6, 14, 17). However, no information on in vivo stability of such peptide analogues and the possible direct contribution of this resistance in their ability to modulate the immune response is available. Increased biological activity of protease-resistant pseudopeptide analogues has already been widely shown in other fields of medical chemistry (for review, see Ref. 18, 19-22). The retro-inverso analogue of the immunostimulatory molecule tuftsin is an outstanding example of a bioactive tetrapeptide for which biological efficiency in vivo has been remarkably increased by introducing one modified peptide bond (22). To examine the possible influence of proteolytic resistance of MHC class I binding peptides on their biological activity, we designed a series of eight reduced peptide bond pseudopeptides of the immunodominant CD8+ T cell epitope of LCMV in C57BL/6 (B6, H-2b) mice. This CTL epitope (called GP33) is located in residues 33-41 of the LCMV glycoprotein (23). We tested the capacity of these eight analogues, each containing one reduced peptide bond Psi (CH2-NH) at successive positions, to bind to H-2Db MHC molecules. The peptides that bound significantly to H-2Db were further analyzed with respect to their recognition by GP33-specific T cells from a Tg mouse that expresses a H-2Db-restricted T cell receptor specific for this epitope and for their ability to induce antiviral protection.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

Peptides-- LCMV glycoprotein 33-41 peptide (GP33, KAVYNFATM) (23) and the control Db-restricted adenovirus peptide 234-243 (E1A, SGPSNTPPEI) (24) were purchased from Neosystem (Strasbourg, France). To prevent dimer formation, the original cysteine residue present at the anchor position 41 of the GP33 peptide was replaced by a methionine residue. The reduced peptide bond analogues were synthesized, purified, and analyzed as described previously (25).

Protease Resistance Analysis in Vitro and in Vivo-- To study the resistance of GP33 and Psi (6-7) peptides to proteases in vitro, peptides (625 µg/ml) were incubated at 20 °C in fresh mouse serum diluted two times in PBS, pH 7.4. The reaction was stopped at intervals by adding trifluoroacetic acid (10% of the final volume). The suspension was diluted five times with water and centrifuged at 2000 × g. The extent of peptide cleavage was estimated by reversed phase HPLC as described previously (6), and the main cleavage site was identified by mass analysis of the compounds present in the major HPLC peaks after a 1-min incubation in fresh mouse serum. To study the protease resistance of peptide in vivo, mice were injected intravenously with 200 µg of peptide in 400 µl of PBS. Blood was collected at intervals from retroorbital venus plexus, and serum samples were prepared and immediately stored at -20 °C until use. The presence of remaining GP33 and Psi (6-7) peptides in sera was assessed using a proliferation assay with LCMV TCR+ T cells (see below) using the sera diluted 1:100-1:3000. To analyze the presence of peptides on spleen cells, the mice were injected intravenously with peptide, and after the indicated time points, spleen cells were isolated and used as stimulators (2 × 105 cells/well) in a proliferation assay with LCMV TCR+ T cells. The percentage of proliferation was calculated using the following ratio: (cpm obtained with serum or APC/cpm obtained with exogenously added 10-7 M peptide) × 100. The proliferation level obtained with 10-7 M GP33 peptide was determined in each experiment.

Mice and Virus-- B6 mice were obtained from our breeding colony (Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene) and from Harlan (Borchen, Germany). The TCR Tg mouse (LCMV TCR+ mouse) expressing a TCR specific for the immunodominant epitope GP33 in a Db restriction context (line 318) has been described previously (26). Animals were kept under conventional conditions and used 12-24 weeks after birth. For immunizations, peptides were dissolved in PBS and in some experiments emulsified 1:1 (v/v) in IFA. Frequency, route of injection, and amounts of peptide are specified in the figure legends and in the text. The LCMV-WE virus strain used in this study was originally obtained from F. Lehmann-Grube and was propagated on L929 fibroblast cells. Mice were injected intravenously with 200 plaque-forming units of LCMV-WE, and the virus titer in the spleen was determined 4 days later as described previously (27).

Proliferation and Cytotoxicity Assays-- In proliferation assays, responder spleen cells from LCMV TCR+ mice were incubated in 96-well plates (4 × 105 cells/well) with serial dilutions of the various peptides. Forty-eight hours later, cultures were pulsed with 1 µCi/well [3H]thymidine for 8 h and harvested onto filter papers. Results are displayed as cpm determined with a Trace 96 counter (Berthold-Inotech, Jaffrey, NH). Cytolytic activity was determined in a 51Cr release assay as described (28), using as target cells 51Cr-labeled EL4 coated with decreasing concentrations (10-6 to 10-10 M) of the different peptides and as responder cells Tg effector cells at the indicated effector-to-target ratios. The responder LCMV TCR+ effector T cells were generated by co-culturing 4 × 106 spleen cells from LCMV TCR+ mice for 3 days before the CTL assay with 2 × 106 GP33-loaded B6 spleen cells.

MHC-Peptide Complex Stabilization Assay-- The binding of GP33 and peptide analogues to MHC molecules was assessed by the stabilization assay using transporter associated with antigen processing-deficient RMA-S cells (29). RMA-S cells (H-2b) were cultured overnight at 25 °C to achieve maximal expression of empty MHC molecules on the cell surface. Cells (5 × 105) were then incubated for 4 h at 37 °C in 96-well round-bottom plates with different peptide concentrations. Cells were then washed once and stained for Db expression with the anti-Db monoclonal antibody B-22-243 (30) followed by fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Caltag, San Francisco, CA). The quantity of stabilized Db molecules on the cell surface was determined by flow cytometry using a FACSort flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson, Montain View, CA).

    RESULTS

Binding of GP33 Analogues to H-2Db MHC Molecules-- Eight reduced peptide bond pseudopeptides corresponding to the H-2Db-restricted CD8+ T cell GP33 LCMV epitope were used in this study. These analogues were obtained by replacing one natural peptide bond at a time by a reduced peptide bond Psi (CH2-NH). The amino acid sequence and characteristics of these peptides are shown in Table I. The eight analogues were first tested for their ability to bind to MHC Db class I molecules using transporter associated with antigen processing-deficient RMA-S cells. The stabilized Db-peptide complexes were quantified by flow cytometry using a Db-specific monoclonal antibody. Two of the eight pseudopeptides, namely those containing a reduced peptide bond between residues Asn5 and Phe6, analogue Psi (5-6), and between Phe6 and Ala7, analogue Psi (6-7), bound to Db molecules as efficiently as the parent GP33 peptide (Fig. 1). The six other analogues were unable to stabilize Db molecules at a physiological range of peptide concentration.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Peptide sequence, retention times (Rt) in analytical reversed phase HPLC, and peptide masses of the GP33 peptide and reduced peptide bond analogues


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Binding of GP33 analogues to H-2Db MHC molecules. Parent GP33 peptide and the GP33 pseudopeptides were tested at different concentrations (10-4 to 10-10 M) to stabilize MHC class I H-2Db molecules present on the surface of RMA-S cells. Stabilization of molecules was determined by flow cytometry using the Db-specific monoclonal antibody B-22-243.

The Psi (6-7) Analogue Is Recognized by T Cells from LCMV TCR+ Mice as Efficiently as the GP33 Parent Peptide-- Proliferation assays with CD8+ T cells from LCMV TCR+ mice were used to examine T cell recognition of the two Db binding analogues Psi (5-6) and Psi (6-7). As shown in Fig. 2A, the Psi (5-6) analogue did not stimulate LCMV TCR+ T cells. In contrast, the Psi (6-7) analogue induced proliferation of Tg T cells as efficiently as the GP33 peptide. Peptide recognition by LCMV TCR+ effector T cells was further examined in 51Cr release assays using EL-4 target cells loaded with different concentrations of GP33 Psi (5-6) and Psi (6-7) peptides and the control Db-restricted adenovirus E1A peptide. The Tg effector T cells, generated in vitro in the presence of GP33-loaded APC, lysed target cells presenting GP33 and Psi (6-7) peptides to a similar extent but failed to recognize target cells loaded with the Psi (5-6) peptide and control E1A peptide (Fig. 2B). Taken together, these data clearly show that the Psi (6-7) analogue is recognized as efficiently as the parent GP33 peptide by LCMV TCR+ T cells. For further analysis, only the Psi (6-7) analogue was used.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   LCMV TCR+ T cells efficiently recognize the Psi (6-7) but not the Psi (5-6) analogue. A, proliferation of LCMV TCR+ spleen cells in the presence of the indicated concentrations of peptide measured by [3H]thymidine incorporation. B, specific lysis by LCMV TCR+ effector cells of EL4 target cells loaded with 10-6, 10-8, or 10-10 M peptides GP33 Psi (5-6) and Psi (6-7) and the control peptide E1A. The E1A peptide is a Db binding epitope from adenovirus and was used as a negative control.

Stability to Proteases of the GP33 Parent and Psi (6-7) Peptides in Vitro-- The proteolytic degradation of the GP33 and Psi (6-7) peptides by proteases present in mouse serum was examined by HPLC. The half-life of the Psi (6-7) peptide in serum was superior to 1 h, whereas the parent peptide GP33 was almost completely degraded within a few minutes (Fig. 3A). When the GP33 peptide was analyzed by HPLC shortly after digestion (1 min), two main peaks were observed (Fig. 3B). Mass spectrometry analysis revealed that the complete GP33 peptide of sequence KAVYNFATM was present in peak 1, whereas a peptide fragment corresponding to the 6 N-terminal residues (KAVYNF) was eluted in peak 2. These results suggest that the GP33 peptide contains a particularly sensitive site between residues 6 and 7 that is rapidly cleaved by mouse serum proteases in vitro and that this site is probably "protected" from cleavage in the remarkably more resistant Psi (6-7) analogue.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   The Psi (6-7) analogue is highly resistant to in vitro protease digestion, and the major proteolytic cleavage site in the GP33 parent peptide is located between residues 6 and 7. A, proteolytic degradation of GP33 and Psi (6-7) peptides in mouse serum. At the time points indicated, the digestion was stopped, and the remaining peptide fragments were analyzed by HPLC as described under "Materials and Methods." B, determination of the cleavage site in the GP33 parent peptide after digestion by proteolytic enzymes. At time points 0 and 1 min of incubation of the GP33 parent peptide with mouse serum, the main peaks eluted from the HPLC column were analyzed by mass spectrometry. The cleavage site was deduced from the mass of the main fragment appearing after 1 min of digestion (Peak 2). Peak 1 corresponds to undigested GP33 peptide.

The Psi (6-7) Analogue Exhibits a Longer Half-life in Vivo-- To measure the half-life of the GP33 and Psi (6-7) peptides in vivo, B6 mice were injected intravenously with peptides, and the peptide remaining over the time in the serum of these animals was determined using antigen-induced proliferation of LCMV TCR+ T cells as an experimental readout. Using the mouse sera diluted 1:100 in this very sensitive functional test, the presence of GP33 peptide could not be detected in blood 5 min after peptide injection (Fig. 4, A and B). In contrast, Psi (6-7) peptide was readily detectable after 5 min using 1:3000-fold diluted sera from mice injected with the analogue (Fig. 4A). Using the sera diluted 1:100, the presence of the analogue was still clearly measurable 1 h after injection of mice (Fig. 4B).


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   The Psi (6-7) analogue persists longer than the parent peptide both in the serum and on the spleen cells of peptide-injected B6 mice. For experiments described in A-C, mice were injected one time intravenously in the tail vein with 200 µg of GP33 or Psi (6-7) peptides. A, 5 min after peptide injection, serum was taken from the retroorbital venus plexus and incubated with LCMV TCR+ cells in a proliferation assay. At dilutions <1:100, mouse serum was toxic for the cultures. B, pharmacokinetics of the Psi (6-7) analogue and the GP33 peptide in the serum. At the indicated time points after peptide injection, serum was taken and incubated at a 1:100 dilution with LCMV TCR+ cells in a proliferation assay. C, sustained presence of the Psi (6-7) analogue on spleen cells. At the indicated time points after peptide injection, mice were killed, and splenocytes were used as stimulators in a proliferation assay with LCMV TCR+ T cells. The data in A-C correspond to the mean obtained from experimental groups of at least three mice.

In Vivo Half-life of the Peptide-MHC Complexes-- The in vivo half-life of the peptide-MHC complexes was determined on spleen cells from mice injected with either the parent GP33 peptide or the Psi (6-7) analogue. In these experiments, spleen cells from peptide-injected B6 mice were directly used as APC for LCMV TCR+ T cells in a proliferation assay. As shown in Fig. 4C, the spleen cells were rapidly loaded with both GP33 and Psi (6-7) peptides (~10 min after injection), and the stimulatory capacities of spleen cells remained comparable for both peptides until ~15 h. However, 24-30 h after peptide injection, only spleen cells from Psi (6-7) peptide-injected mice were found to be stimulatory for LCMV TCR+ T cells. Thus, the half-life of the Psi (6-7) peptide-Db complex in vivo on spleen cells was ~2-fold increased when compared with the parent GP33 peptide (30-40 versus 15-24 h).

The Psi (6-7) Peptide Analogue Efficiently Induces Antiviral Protection-- The data described above show that as efficiently as the parent peptide GP33, the Psi (6-7) analogue is recognized by the Tg LCMV TCR and that the half-life of the Psi (6-7) peptide-Db complex in vivo is significantly increased compared with that of GP33 peptide-Db complex. To further examine the potential advantage of using the Psi (6-7) peptide in vivo, we tested the ability of the analogue to induce antiviral protection. Because of the high frequency of GP33-specific T cells in LCMV TCR+ mice, antiviral protection induced by peptides cannot be directly examined in these mice, because inoculated virus is rapidly cleared (23). Therefore, we examined antiviral protection in B6 mice in which a small number (105/mouse) of LCMV TCR+ T cells were adoptively transferred. After peptide immunization, mice were challenged with LCMV and virus titers were determined as described under "Materials and Methods." As shown in Fig. 5A, peptide immunization using subcutaneous injection of either the GP33 parent peptide or Psi (6-7) analogue in IFA induced a similar extent of antiviral protection. On the other hand, no significant protection was observed when mice received a single subcutaneous injection of 100 µg of GP33 or Psi (6-7) peptides in the absence of IFA (Fig. 5B). However, when mice received three successive subcutaneous injections of 50 µg of peptides in the absence of IFA (Fig. 5B), a significant decrease (10-100-fold) of virus titer was observed in mice immunized with Psi (6-7), whereas no effect was found in mice immunized with the GP33 parent peptide.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Antiviral protection induced by GP33 and Psi (6-7) peptides. One day before peptide immunization, LCMV TCR+ naive T cells (105 cells/mouse in 500 µl of PBS) were transferred into nontransgenic B6 mice. Ten days after immunizations, mice were challenged with LCMV, and 4 days later, virus titers in the spleens were determined. Dots represent individual mice (at least three per group). The full lines are the mean of all values within each experimental group. The dotted line corresponds to the detection limit of the virus plaque assay. A, peptides injected subcutaneously at the indicated doses in the presence of IFA. B, peptides injected in PBS using the indicated routes and frequency of injection.


    DISCUSSION

The use of peptides corresponding to MHC class I epitopes to induce a protective CTL response against viruses or tumors is of particular interest in the development of peptide-based vaccines. Recent investigations have suggested that antigenic pseudopeptides containing one or several peptide bond isosters might advantageously replace natural peptides in therapeutic strategies because they can bind to MHC class I molecules and generate an efficient T cell response (7, 13, 14). In this study, we have examined the antigenic and immunogenic properties of pseudopeptide analogues derived from the LCMV glycoprotein peptide 33-41 (GP33) in which one CO-NH amide bond at a time was replaced by a reduced peptide bond Psi (CH2-NH) in the native sequence. GP33 is presented by H-2Db MHC molecules and recognized in this context by specific CD8+ T cells. This model was particularly interesting for at least three reasons. First, although infection with cytopathic viruses (e.g. vaccina, vesicular stomatis, Semliki Forest, or influenza virus) is controlled by soluble mediators such as antibodies and cytokines, T cell-mediated cytotoxicity is crucial for the resolution of infections with noncytopathic viruses such as LCMV (31). LCMV is thus an excellent model to study in vivo the efficacy of the CTL response induced by modified peptides. Second, it is known that although the parent peptide GP33 is particularly efficient to induce protection against a viral challenge when it is injected in the presence of IFA, this peptide is unable to generate protection when used in saline solution. Third, a transgenic model containing within the CD8+ T cell population 40-60% transgenic TCR+ (Valpha 2/Vbeta 8) T cells specific for peptide GP33 presented in the H-2Db MHC context is available (27), thus allowing in vivo study of the recognition of the peptide (or pseudopeptide)-MHC complexes by this TCR.

Two of eight analogues studied, namely Psi (5-6) and Psi (6-7), were able to bind to H-2Db molecules with an apparent affinity similar to that of the parent GP33 peptide. Guichard et al. (7) previously found that five of eight reduced peptide bond analogues derived from a Plasmodium berghei MHC class I epitope could bind to soluble recombinant H-2Kd molecules. However, the relative affinity of these pseudopeptides to MHC molecules was 5-10-fold lower than that of the parent peptide. The present finding that most of the reduced peptide bond analogues of GP33 exhibited a decreased or no MHC binding capacity correlates with crystallographic data indicating that the peptide backbone plays an important role for binding of peptide to MHC class I molecules (32). It also suggests that in this case, the carbonyl oxygens of the residues in positions 5 and 6 are not essential for peptide-MHC binding.

CD8+ T cells from LCMV TCR+ mice recognized equally well the parent GP33 peptide and the Psi (6-7) analogue. In contrast, they did not recognize the Psi (5-6) analogue presented in the H-2Db context. This result suggests either that the carbonyl oxygen of the residue in position 5 is directly involved in the interaction with the TCR or that this oxygen atom influences the orientation of the Phe6 side chain that has been shown to be crucial for TCR recognition (23, 33, 34).

Because the parent and Psi (6-7) peptides share similar antigenic properties, the role of their respective susceptibility to proteases in relation to their biological activity could be investigated. We found that the level of GP33 resistance to mouse proteases drastically increased when a single peptide bond located between residues 6 and 7 was replaced by a reduced peptide bond in analogue Psi (6-7). This result fits well with the observation that a highly protease-sensitive cleavage site is located between positions 6 and 7 in GP33. The detailed molecular mechanisms of GP33 degradation have not yet been elucidated. Cleavage by an endopeptidase remains the most likely possibility, although intervention of carboxypeptidases cannot be excluded. When examined in vivo, the stability of the Psi (6-7) analogue was also significantly increased. Its half-life in the serum of injected mice was increased by >10 times compared with GP33. The rapid disappearance of GP33 from serum (by renal clearance or most probably as a result of proteolytic degradation), however, may be balanced by the very fast loading of GP33 to MHC molecules from APC. Ten minutes after peptide injection, GP33 (as well as the Psi (6-7) peptide) was present on splenocytes. This rapid loading of exogenously provided peptides suggests a direct binding to MHC molecules without internalization.

In good agreement with previous results (35, 36), the estimated functional half-life of complexes formed in vivo by H-2Db and GP33 was ~10-15 h. In the same test, the half-life of the Psi (6-7)-MHC complexes on APC was increased by a factor of two. Several possibilities may account for this increased stability of Psi (6-7)-MHC complexes. As shown in a stabilization assay with RMA-S cells, the binding of Psi (6-7) and GP33 peptides to MHC molecules was similar. Nevertheless, we cannot rule out the possibility that the affinity equilibrium constant of the parent peptide and the Psi (6-7) analogue to Db molecules are slightly different. A second possibility is that reloading on the cell surface after dissociation from the MHC groove is increased in the case of the Psi (6-7) analogue because this analogue probably also exhibits an enhanced resistance to proteases present in the extracellular matrix. Finally, it is possible that peptide-MHC complexes are internalized after a few hours, and that because of increased proteolytic resistance to cytoplasmic proteases, the Psi (6-7) analogue can be reloaded on MHC molecules and represented at the cell surface.

Because of the fact that GP33 and Psi (6-7) are loaded to MHC molecules with a similar initial efficacy, when we assessed the immunogenic activity of the Psi (6-7) analogue in antiviral protection experiments (peptides injected in IFA), we did not find an improved T cell response to the more stable peptide Psi (6-7). The pseudopeptide effectively showed antiviral protection properties, which is a novel observation, but these were not significantly different from those observed with GP33. This result suggests that possibly because of the presence of oil in the adjuvant, the advantage of increased proteolytic resistance and prolonged in vivo persistence did not improve the apparent biological activity of the analogue. Furthermore, once peptides are bound to MHC molecules they are apparently protected from digestion (37). It is known that injection of GP33 inoculated without adjuvant is not able to protect mice from LCMV after challenge infection (Ref. 38 and Fig. 5B). An important observation shown in this study is that three subcutaneous injections of the free analogue Psi (6-7) in saline were able to reduce the virus titer in the spleen of immunized mice. This result suggests that Psi (6-7) but not GP33 is able to prime T cells in the absence of IFA. It remains to be analyzed whether this result is attributable to the higher stability of the Psi (6-7) analogue in the circulation or to the prolonged half-life of the Psi (6-7) peptide-MHC complexes. However, the reduction of virus titers obtained with Psi (6-7) in PBS was not as impressive as observed with peptides in IFA, suggesting the need of an inflammatory process to reach complete antiviral protection. Because our conclusions are of immediate relevance to vaccination, it would be interesting to test the presence and reactivity of memory CD8+ T cells generated after pseudopeptide vaccination. Finally, to better understand the possible mechanisms involved in the clearance of virus by peptide-activated T cells, it will be important to examine the immunological properties of modified peptide ligands containing different types of amide bond isosteric replacements in different viral systems.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank S. Batsford and G. Guichard for comments on the manuscript, M. Rawiel for excellent technical assistance, and S. Denkler and T. Imhof for animal husbandry.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant PI 295/3-1 and by grants from the Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer and Agence Nationale de Recherche sur le SIDA.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Recipient of a postdoctoral fellowship from Alexander Von Humboldt Stiftung and from INSERM.

Supported by a grant from La Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer.

parallel To whom correspondence should be addressed: Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Department of Immunology, Hermann Herder Str. 11, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany. Tel.: 49-761-203-6521; Fax: 49-761-203-6577; E-mail: pircher{at}ukl.uni-freiburg.de.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: MHC, major histocompatibility complex; APC, antigen-presenting cell; CTL, cytotoxic T lymphocyte; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography; IFA, incomplete Freund's adjuvant; LCMV, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; TCR, T cell receptor; Tg, transgenic.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
References
  1. Liu, M. A. (1998) Nat. Med. 4 Suppl. 5, 503[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Stemmer, C., and Guichard, G. (1998) Exp. Opin. Ther. Patents 8, 819-830
  3. Gante, J. (1994) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 33, 1699-1720
  4. Guichard, G., Benkirane, N., Graff, R., Muller, S., and Briand, J.-P. (1994) Pept. Res. 7, 308-321[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Benkirane, N., Guichard, G., Briand, J.-P., and Muller, S. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 33218-33224[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Briand, J.-P., Benkirane, N., Guichard, G., Newman, J. F. E., Van Regenmortel, M. H. V., Brown, F., and Muller, S. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 12545-12550[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Guichard, G., Calbo, S., Muller, S., Kourilsky, P., Briand, J.-P., and Abastado, J.-P. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 26057-26059[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Guichard, G., Connan, F., Graff, R., Ostankovitch, M., Muller, S., Guillet, J.-G., Choppin, J., and Briand, J.-P. (1996) J. Med. Chem. 39, 2030-2039[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Hill, C. M., Liu, A., Marshall, K. W., Mayer, J., Jorgensen, B., Yuan, B., Cubbon, R. M., Nichols, E. A., Wicker, L. S., and Rothbard, J. B. (1994) J. Immunol. 152, 2890-2898[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Ettouati, L., Salvi, J.-P., Trescol-Biemont, M. C., Walchshofer, N., Gerlier, D., Rabourdin-Combe, C., and Paris, J. (1996) Pept. Res. 9, 248-253[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Mézière, C., Viguier, M., Dumortier, H., Lo-Man, M. R., Leclerc, C., Guillet, J.-G., Briand, J.-P., and Muller, S. (1997) J. Immunol. 159, 3230-3237[Abstract]
  12. Cotton, J., Hervé, M., Pouvelle, S., Maillère, B., and Ménez, A. (1998) Int. Immunol. 10, 159-166[Abstract]
  13. Bianco, A., Brock, C., Zabel, C., Walk, T., Walden, P., and Jung, G. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 28759-28765[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Ostankovitch, M., Guichard, G., Connan, F., Muller, S., Chaboissier, A., Hoebeke, J., Choppin, J., Briand, J.-P., and Guillet, J.-G. (1998) J. Immunol. 161, 200-208[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Sloan-Lancaster, L. J., and Allen, P. M. (1995) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 7, 103-109[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Muller, S., and Briand, J.-P. (1998) Res. Immunol. 149, 55-57[CrossRef]
  17. Guichard, G., Benkirane, N., Zeder-Lutz, G., Van Regenmortel, M. H. V., Briand, J.-P., and Muller, S. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 9765-9769[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Fauchère, J.-L., and Thurieau, C. (1992) Adv. Drug. Res. 23, 127-159
  19. Buss, J. E., and Marsters, J. C. J. (1995) Chem. Biol. 2, 787-791[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Teal, P. E., and Nachman, R. J. (1997) Regul. Pept. 72, 161-167[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Azay, J., Nagain, C., Llinares, M., Devin, C., Fehrentz, J. A., Bernad, N., Roze, C., and Martinez, J. (1998) Peptides 19, 57-63[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Verdini, A. S., Silvestri, S., Becherucci, C., Longobardi, M. G., Parente, L., Peppoloni, S., Perretti, M., Pileri, P., Pinori, M., Viscomi, G. C., and Nencioni, L. (1991) J. Med. Chem. 34, 3372-3379[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Pircher, H., Moskophidis, D., Rohrer, U., Burki, K., Hengartner, H., and Zinkernagel, R. M. (1990) Nature 346, 629-633[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Luescher, I. F., Loez, J. A., Malissen, B., and Cerottini, J. C. (1992) J. Immunol. 148, 1003-1011[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Quesnel, A., and Briand, J.-P. (1998) J Pept Res 52, 107-111[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Pircher, H., Burki, K., Lang, R., Hengartner, H., and Zinkernagel, R. M. (1989) Nature 342, 559-561[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Battegay, M., Cooper, S., Althage, A., Baenziger, J., Hengartner, H., Zinkernagel, R., and Pircher, H. (1991) J. Virol. Methods 33, 191-198[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Zinkernagel, R. M., Leist, T. P., Hengartner, H., and Althage, A. (1985) J. Exp. Med. 162, 2125-2141[Abstract]
  29. Townsend, A., Ohlen, C., Bastin, J., Ljunggren, H. G., Foster, L., and Karre, K. (1989) Nature 340, 443-448[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Hämmerling, G. J., Hämmerling, U., and Lemke, H. (1979) Immunogenetics 8, 433-445
  31. Kägi, D., and Hengartner, H. (1996) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 8, 472-477[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Young, A. C., Zhang, W., Sacchettini, J. C., and Nathenson, S. G. (1994) Cell 76, 39-50[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Sebzda, E., Kundig, T. M., Thomson, C. T., Aoki, K., Mak, S. Y., Mayer, J. P., Zamborelli, T., Nathenson, S. G., and Ohashi, P. S. (1996) J. Exp. Med. 183, 1093-1104[Abstract]
  34. Hudrisier, D., Oldstone, M. B., and Gairin, J.-E. (1997) Virology 234, 62-73[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Romero, P., Corradin, G., Luescher, I. F., and Maryanski, J. L. (1991) J. Exp. Med. 174, 603-612[Abstract]
  36. Eberl, G., Widmann, C., and Corradin, G. (1996) Eur. J. Immunol. 26, 1993-1999[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Mouritsen, S., Meldal, M., Werdelin, O., Hansen, A. S., and Buus, S. (1992) J. Immunol. 149, 1987-1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Aichele, P., Brduscha, R. K., Zinkernagel, R. M., Hengartner, H., and Pircher, H. (1995) J. Exp. Med. 182, 261-266[Abstract]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.