The Structural and Functional Analysis of the Hemoglobin D Component from Chicken*

James E. KnappDagger , Marcos A. OliveiraDagger , Qiang Xie§, Stephen R. ErnstDagger , Austen F. Riggs§, and Marvin L. HackertDagger

From the Dagger  Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712 and the § Department of Zoology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
References

Oxygen binding by chicken blood shows enhanced cooperativity at high levels of oxygen saturation. This implies that deoxy hemoglobin tetramers self-associate. The crystal structure of an R-state form of chicken hemoglobin D has been solved to 2.3-Å resolution using molecular replacement phases derived from human oxyhemoglobin. The model consists of an alpha 2beta 2 tetramer in the asymmetric unit and has been refined to a R-factor of 0.222 (R-free = 0.257) for 29,702 reflections between 10.0- and 2.3-Å resolution. Chicken Hb D differs most from human oxyhemoglobin in the AB and GH corners of the alpha  subunits and the EF corner of the beta  subunits. Reanalysis of published oxygen binding data for chicken Hbs shows that both chicken Hb A and Hb D possess enhanced cooperativity in vitro when inositol hexaphosphate is present. The electrostatic surface potential for a calculated model of chicken deoxy-Hb D tetramers shows a pronounced hydrophobic patch that involves parts of the D and E helices of the beta  subunits. This hydrophobic patch is a promising candidate for a tetramer-tetramer interface that could regulate oxygen binding via the distal histidine.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
References

The oxygen binding curves of chicken blood samples taken at different stages of development exhibit Hill coefficients which exceed 4.0 (super-cooperativity) at oxygen saturation levels between 70 and 90% oxygenation (1-5). Elevated levels of oxygen-binding cooperativity should be advantageous because such hemoglobins (Hbs)1 would deliver a greater quantity of oxygen to the tissues under normal physiological conditions. Super-cooperativity has also been observed in the blood and Hbs of several species of amphibians (6-8), reptiles (9-10), other birds (1, 11), and embryonic mammals (12-14). Although incomplete oxygen saturation resulted in spuriously high Hill coefficients in much of the early data (see Refs. 15-18), the data of Lapennas and Reeves (5) on chicken blood and Holland et al. (12-14) on embryonic marsupial blood were obtained at saturating pressures of O2.

The blood of adult chickens, as in most other birds, is composed of two Hb components that have identical beta  chains but differ in the sequences of the alpha  subunits. Hb A (alpha A2beta 2) and Hb D (alpha D2beta 2) are expressed in a 3:1 ratio in adult chickens (19). The sequence of the alpha  chain from Hb D (alpha D) is 58.9% identical to that of Hb A (alpha A). The large Hill coefficients observed in chicken blood imply that the deoxy-Hb tetramers associate into oligomers because the Hill coefficient cannot be greater than the number of subunits. Although super-cooperativity has not been reported for the purified adult chicken Hb components, the self-association of deoxy tetramers is known. Sedimentation analysis of chicken Hbs A and D showed that only deoxygenated Hb D self-associates. This analysis demonstrated that deoxy-Hb D forms a dimer of tetramers with an association constant of 1.26 × 104 M-1 (20). Because the two chicken Hb components only differ in their alpha  chains, it was concluded that the tetramer-tetramer contacts lie on the surface of the alpha D subunit (20). This led to a proposed model that describes the interface that might form between two Hb D tetramers (20).

The cooperative binding of oxygen by tetrameric Hbs arises from the transition of the Hb from a conformation with a low oxygen affinity (T-state) to a conformation with a high oxygen affinity (R-state) (21, 22). Much of our understanding of this process has come from the crystallographic analysis of the unligated (T-state) and ligated (R-state) structures of both human Hb A (23-26) and horse Hb (27-30). Although a structural explanation of super-cooperativity requires the crystallographic analysis of both the R- and T-state forms of chicken Hb D, the analysis of intermediate structures are likely to be necessary for understanding the mechanism of cooperativity because knowledge of two thermodynamic states does not itself determine the pathway between them. We report here the structure of an R-state form of chicken Hb D solved with diffraction data to 2.3-Å resolution. This structure provides the first step towards a model for enhanced cooperativity and is the first structure reported for the minor Hb (D) component of birds, and the second structure of an avian Hb (31). The re-analysis of the oxygen binding data in the literature demonstrates a previously, overlooked relationship between super-cooperativity and inositol hexaphosphate (IHP) binding.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

Purification, Crystallization, and Data Collection-- Chicken Hb D was purified from chicken blood using DEAE and gel filtration chromatography as described previously (20). Several grains of sodium dithionite (Miles-Platting, Manchester, United Kingdom) were added to the Hb solutions prior to crystallization. Conditions for crystallization were screened by the sparse matrix technique (32) with the hanging drop method (33). Chicken Hb D was crystallized with a combination of PEG 3350 and either lithium sulfate or sodium acetate as the precipitant. The precipitant concentration was varied from 20 to 30% polyethylene glycol and from 10 to 30 mM salt, with a protein concentration of 20 mg/ml in 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5. The crystal setups were prepared under nitrogen in a glove box (Bactron 1 model, Anaerobe Systems Inc.) and then transferred to a desiccator that was flushed with nitrogen. The desiccator was then placed in a cold room at 4 °C for 2 weeks. Crystals of Hb D grew as plates of about 0.1 mm in thickness and 1.0-mm wide.

X-ray data were collected on a San Diego Multiwire area detector equipped with a Rigaku RU-200 rotating anode generator operated at 50 kV and 110 mA. The initial x-ray analysis indicated that the chicken Hb D crystals belong to the space group P21 with cell dimensions of a = 53.96 Å, b = 80.51 Å, c = 82.11 Å, and beta  = 104.51°. Assuming the presence of two tetramers of 66,452 daltons in the unit cell, the Matthew's parameter is equal to 2.6 Å3/dalton. A data set was collected from nine orientations of a single crystal by the method described by Xuong et al. (34). The data were collected at room temperature, with a rotation angle of 0.12° in omega , and an exposure time of 60 s. The measured intensities were processed with the University of California, San Diego package (35). The resulting data set is 91% complete to 2.1-Å resolution with an overall multiplicity of 6.8, and an overall Rsym of 8.1%. Because of the low signal to noise in the last resolution shell, only the data to 2.3-Å resolution were used in the refinement of the Hb D model. The last resolution shell (2.5-2.3 Å) has an average multiplicity of 3.6, a Rsym of 23.9%, and an average I/sigma (I) of 2.3.

Structure Determination-- The initial phases were obtained by the molecular replacement method with the human Hb tetramer serving as the search model. The alpha  and beta  chains of chicken Hb D are 61.7 and 68.7% identical to those of human Hb A, respectively. Both the deoxy (26) and the oxy (25) forms of human Hb were used as search models because there was some doubt that the crystals of Hb D were deoxy. Each of the Hb models consisted of the human sequence with all identical residues being retained and all non-identical residues being truncated to alanine. All the molecular replacement and refinement routines were performed using the computer program X-PLOR version 3.1 (36) running on a DEC ALPHA server. The molecular replacement protocol included a Patterson correlation refinement step (37) that allowed each of the subunits of the search model to be optimized by rigid body refinement before the translation function was performed. The cross-rotation function followed by the Patterson correlation refinement using either Hb search model resulted in a rotation solution at 288°, 45°, 348° (theta 1, theta 2, theta 3, zxz Eulerian angles). The translation function for either model produced a clear peak at 0.407, 0.000, and 0.232 (xyz in fractional coordinates). An examination of the correctly positioned models indicated that the conformation of both models described an R-state Hb; therefore, only the oxy model, which gave a slightly better signal to noise ratio in the translation function (12.4 sigma /mean compared with 10.1 sigma /mean for the deoxy model) was refined against the observed data. The initial R-factor of the positioned model was 0.457 for all measured data between 8.0 and 3.0-Å resolution.

Refinement-- After the initial molecular replacement solution, a set of 3407 reflections or 10% of all the reflections was set aside to be used in the calculation of R-free (38). The model was then subjected to an additional round of rigid body refinement in which the entire model was first refined as a rigid body before the individual subunits were refined as rigid bodies. The chicken Hb D model was then subjected to 8 additional rounds of X-PLOR refinement using the ideal parameter set of Engh and Huber (39). During the first five rounds of X-PLOR refinement, the two alpha beta dimers were constrained to be identical with strict non-crystallographic symmetry (NCS). During the last three rounds of refinement, the regions of the structure which showed asymmetry in the electron density between the NCS-related subunits were allowed to refine without NCS restraints whereas all other regions of the model were refined imposing tight NCS restraints. During the last round of refinement, most of the main chain atoms of the two dimers were tightly restrained whereas the side chain atoms were loosely restrained. The first four and the last four residues from each subunit as well as the residues that form the EF corner from each subunit were not restrained. All attempts to completely remove the NCS restraints resulted in a poorer model as judged by an increase in R-free.

A typical round of X-PLOR refinement included positional refinement using the conjugate gradient energy minimization (40) followed by B-factor refinement. Early in the refinement process (rounds 1-3), both a main chain and a side chain B-factor were optimized for each residue. After the third round, individual B-factors were refined. The first round of refinement included the refinement of each of the helical segments as rigid bodies. The second and third rounds included a simulated annealing step (41, 42). Between each round of X-PLOR refinement, the model was fitted to either 2Fo - Fc alpha calc or Fo - Fc alpha calc electron density maps using the program O (43) running on a Silicon Graphics Crimson workstation. After each round of X-PLOR refinement and manual intervention, the quality of the stereochemistry of the model was monitored using the program PROCHECK (44). Regions of the structure with either questionable density or poor geometry were rebuilt into simulated annealing 2Fo - Fc and Fo - Fc omit maps (45). The side chains for the truncated residues were added to the model only if suitable density was present in the 2Fo - Fc electron density maps.

The first round of X-PLOR refinement resulted in a model with an R-factor of 0.260 (R-free = 0.309) for all measured reflections between 8.0- and 3.0-Å resolution. The quality of the electron density map allowed the side chains of 80 residues (about one-half of the residues truncated) to be added to the model. This model was then subjected to a second round of refinement that extended the data to 2.3-Å resolution over 10 steps of energy minimization. Following the simulated annealing and group B-factor refinement steps, the R-factor rose to 0.261 and the R-free dropped to 0.296 for all measured reflections between 8.0- and 2.3-Å resolution. After the fourth round of refinement, six residues were removed from and 52 water molecules were added to the model. Water molecules were added into Fo - Fc maps contoured at 3sigma using PEAKMAX and WATPEAK (46). Water molecules were removed from the model if either the 2Fo - Fc density was poor or the water failed to form at least one hydrogen bond with either a protein atom or another water molecule. Following a round of energy minimization and individual B-factor refinement, the resulting model had a R-factor of 0.235 (R-free = 0.270). Additional waters were added to the model during the last three rounds of refinement. The improvement of the electron density during the last round of refinement allowed two of the omitted residues to be added to the final model. Oxygen ligands were modeled into simulated annealing omit maps before the last round of X-plor refinement. The oxygen ligands were refined with tight geometric restraints, but without NCS restraints.

Analysis of the Model-- Least-squares superposition calculations were performed using LSQMAN (47) and the results were displayed in O. The coordinates for bar-headed goose Hb A was kindly provided by Dr. Jeremy Tame (University of York, United Kingdom). The plane of the heme group was calculated using the program PLANES (46). Subunit contacts were measured using CONTACT (46). The surface area was determined using the method of Lee and Richards (48) as implemented in SURFACE (46). Figs. 1, 2, and 4 were prepared with MOLSCRIPT (49). Fig. 3 was prepared with the program MOLVIEW (50). Fig. 10 was prepared with GRASP (51). The sequence analysis included the primary structures of 20 alpha A, alpha D, and beta  chains which were obtained from GenBankTM (52).

    RESULTS

The Refined Model-- Crystals of chicken Hb D belong to the monoclinic space group P21 with one alpha 2beta 2 tetramer (a total of 574 residues) in the asymmetric unit. The alpha D and beta  subunits of chicken Hb D are composed of 141 and 146 amino acid residues, respectively. The refined model of chicken Hb D consists of 570 amino acid residues, 4 heme groups, 141 water molecules, and three oxygen ligands. The last residue of the alpha 2 subunit (Arg141) and the last three residues from the beta 1 subunit, Lys144(HC1), Tyr145(HC2), and His146(HC3) were omitted from the final model due to the lack of electron density. In other areas of poor electron density, the side chains of 4 residues were truncated to glycine, 25 were truncated to alanine, and 6 were truncated by two or more atoms. The R-factor of the refined model is 0.222 (R-free = 0.257) for all measured reflections between 10-2.3 Å resolution (Table I). The geometry of the chicken Hb D model is excellent when compared with the ideal parameters of Engh and Huber (39). The Ramachandran plot indicates that 89.2% of the non-glycine, non-proline dihedral angles lie in the most favored regions whereas 9.8 and 1% of the residues have psi  and phi  angles which lie in the additionally allowed and generous regions, respectively. No residue has dihedral angles in the disallowed regions of the Ramachandran plot. The conformation of each residue with psi -phi angles in the generous region of the Ramachandran plot was verified by fitting each of these residues into simulated annealing omit maps.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
The refinement statistics of the current model of chicken oxy-Hb D

Noncrystallographic Symmetry-- The presence of an alpha 2beta 2 tetramer in the crystallographic asymmetric unit results in the generation of a molecular 2-fold axis of NCS between the two alpha beta dimers. Differences between the two dimers are localized to small regions of the model which were not restrained by NCS. The first and last 4 residues from both subunits show the largest differences as indicated by average r.m.s. differences of 1.1 Å/Calpha atom. The residues which form the EF corner of the alpha  subunits (residues 75-77) show small differences as indicated by average r.m.s. differences of 0.35 Å/Calpha atoms. The remaining Calpha atoms have average r.m.s. differences of 0.03 Å/Calpha atom due to the tight restraints. The side chain atoms show larger differences. Excluding the first four and last 4 residues from each subunit, the superposition of the alpha 1beta 1 dimer onto the alpha 2beta 2 dimer gives a r.m.s. difference of 0.47 Å for 2039 main chain and side chain atoms.

Overall Structure and the Comparison with Human Oxy-Hb A-- Chicken Hb D has a quaternary structure which is consistent with other R-state Hbs, but differs from other T-state or R2 state structures. The superposition of 570 Calpha atoms from chicken Hb D onto the corresponding Calpha atoms of human oxy-Hb (25) gives an r.m.s. value of 1.0 Å. The superposition of the Calpha atoms from chicken Hb D onto the corresponding atoms from either T-state or R2-state human Hb shows larger differences. The r.m.s. values are 2.4 and 1.7 Å for the superposition of 570 Calpha atoms from chicken Hb D onto the Calpha atoms from human T-state (26) and R2-state (53) Hbs, respectively.

As expected, the folds of the alpha  and beta  subunits of Hb D are both similar to those of human Hb, with each alpha  subunit composed of seven helical segments (labeled A, B, C, E, F, G, and H) and each beta  subunit composed of eight helical segments (labeled A-H). The inter-helical segments ("corners") formed between helical segments are labeled according to the nomenclature used for myoglobin. The superposition of 141 Calpha atoms of alpha 1, 141 Calpha atoms of alpha 2, 143 Calpha atoms of beta 1, and 146 Calpha atoms of beta 2 of human oxy-Hb (25) onto the corresponding subunits of Hb D gives r.m.s. differences of 1.1, 0.85, 0.79, and 0.78 Å, respectively (Figs. 1 and 2). Both subunits of Hb D show moderate differences in the positioning of the four NH2-terminal and four COOH-terminal residues. However, these segments in chicken Hb D also show the largest differences between NCS related subunits, reflecting the increased flexibility of the termini from each R-state Hb subunit. If these residues are excluded, 133 Calpha atoms of the alpha  subunit and 138 Calpha atoms of the beta  subunit from human Hb superimpose upon their counterparts in chicken Hb D with r.m.s. differences of 0.83 and 0.69 Å, respectively.


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   The stereo view of the alpha  subunit of human oxy-Hb (black) superimposed upon the coordinates of chicken Hb D (gray). The seven alpha  helices are labeled A-C and E-H. The superposition calculation included 140 Calpha atoms of the alpha 2 subunit and resulted in an r.m.s. difference of 0.85 Å. Note the differences in the AB and GH corners between the two alpha  subunits.


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   The stereo view of the beta  subunit of human oxy-Hb (black) superimposed upon the Calpha coordinates of chicken oxy-Hb D (gray). The eight alpha  helices are labeled A-H. The superposition calculation included 146 Calpha atoms of the beta 2 subunit and resulted in an r.m.s. difference of 0.78 Å. Note the differences in the EF corners between the two beta  subunits.

Several other regions of the alpha  and beta  subunits from chicken oxy-Hb D also differ from the corresponding regions in human oxy-Hb. The AB corner of the alpha  subunits of Hb D forms a more helical turn than its counterpart in human Hb (Fig. 1). This difference is due in part to the substitution of 2 glycine residues in human Hb with Alaalpha 18(A16) and Glualpha 22(B3) in chicken Hb D. The tightness of this turn results in a slight change in the orientation of helix B in the alpha  subunit of chicken Hb D. The replacement of a Proalpha 114(GH2) in human Hb with Glyalpha 114 in chicken Hb D results in a movement of the bulge located in the middle of the GH corner. In chicken Hb D, Glyalpha 114 is oriented with a phi  angle of 42° and a psi  angle of -131°, causing a change in the orientation of this bulge, shifting the GH corner, moving the Calpha atom of Lysalpha 115(GH3) by 3.7 Å, and positioning its side chain so that it is rotated by 90° relative to that in human oxy-Hb. A third difference between the two Hbs involves the rotation of the COOH-terminal end of the E helices and of the EF corners (residues 73-84) of the beta  subunits so that the EF corner of the beta  subunit from Hb D is closer to its A helix (Fig. 2).

Comparison with Hb A of Bar-headed Goose-- The structure of one other avian Hb (Bar-headed goose Hb A) has been reported, also in the R-state (31). Although the beta  chains of the two avian adult Hbs are very similar (95.2% sequence identity), chicken alpha D is only 56.0% identical to bar-headed goose alpha A, less than the 61.7% identity which exists between human alpha  and chicken alpha D. The tertiary structures of the alpha  and beta  chains from the two avian Hbs reflect the relative degree of sequence identity. The superposition of 143 Calpha beta -subunit atoms from chicken Hb D onto the corresponding atoms of the bar-headed goose Hb gives an r.m.s. difference of 0.30 Å, compared with an r.m.s. difference of 0.7 Å for the superposition of 140 Calpha atoms in the alpha  subunits. The alpha  subunits of both bar-headed goose and chicken Hbs have nearly identical AB corners but differ in the GH corners. The analysis of other avian alpha  chain sequences suggests that the residues that comprise the AB corner in both bar-headed goose and chicken Hbs are not absolutely conserved in other avian Hbs. Although an acidic residue is present at position 22 (B3) in 38 of the 40 avian alpha  chains surveyed, only 15 of these avian Hbs retain a glycine at position 18 (A16). Avian Hbs with alpha  subunits that retain a glycine only at position 18 would be expected to have an AB corner that differs from that of chicken Hb D. The alpha D subunits of all but one avian Hb D include a glycine at position 114 (GH2) whereas all 20 of the avian alpha A chains surveyed have GH corners with a proline at this position. This result suggests that the conformation of the GH corner observed in chicken Hb D will be characteristic of most Hb D components of avian blood.

The alpha 1beta 1 Interfaces-- The alpha 1beta 1 interface is similar to that found in other vertebrate Hbs. Out of the 36 residues that form the alpha 1beta 1 interface in chicken Hb D (based on those residues with an atom which is within 4.0 Å of an atom from a neighboring subunit), 21 (58%) are identical to their counterparts in human Hb compared with 29 identities (81%) in bar-headed goose Hb A. Although most of these substitutions should not alter the stability of the alpha 1beta 1 interface, there are three substitutions, Glyalpha 114(GH2), Glnalpha 103(G10), and Serbeta 119(GH2), found in chicken Hb D which deserve comment. The replacement of a proline by a glycine at alpha 114 in chicken Hb D results in the reorientation of the alpha 114 main chain torsion angle, thereby eliminating an intersubunit hydrogen bond. In place of this H-bond, the alpha 1beta 1 interface is stabilized by two additional hydrogen bonds, one formed between the hydroxyl group of Serbeta 119(GH2) and the carbonyl oxygen of Valalpha 111(G18) and a second between the side chains of Glnalpha 103(G10) and Aspbeta 108(G10). The addition of an extra H-bond should stabilize both the R- and T-states of chicken Hb D. Glnalpha 103 is conserved in all avian alpha D sequences and about half of the avian alpha A sequences whereas Aspbeta 108 is conserved in all 20 beta  sequences surveyed. Serbeta 119 is only present in four of the avian beta  sequences.

The alpha abeta 2 Interface-- In human and horse Hbs, the alpha 1beta 2 interface involves a total of 17 residues, all of which are highly conserved in vertebrate Hbs. During the T- to R-state transition, this interface acts as a switch. Consequently, both the R- and T-state conformations have distinct sets of interactions which contribute to the stabilization of the alpha 1beta 2 interface. Like most R-state Hbs, the alpha 1beta 2 interface of chicken Hb D includes a hydrogen bond formed between Aspalpha 94(G1) and Asnbeta 102(G4) and lacks a hydrogen bond between Asnalpha 97(G4) and Aspbeta 99(G1). Like the bar-headed goose Hb A, the alpha 1beta 2 interface of chicken Hb D substitutes Glnalpha 38(C3) in place of a threonine found in mammalian Hbs. The hydroxyl group of Thralpha 38 in horse and human Hbs forms a hydrogen bond with the main chain carbonyl oxygen of Hisbeta 97(FG4) when the Hb has an R-state conformation. The side chain of Glnalpha 38 in chicken Hb D cannot form an analogous hydrogen bond, thereby reducing the stability of the alpha 1beta 2 interface. This substitution should increase the oxygen affinity of R-state chicken Hb D because the loss of a hydrogen bond would result in an increase in the concentration of alpha beta dimers which have high oxygen affinity. It is likely that Glnalpha 38 would decrease the cooperativity of chicken Hb D. Samples of purified chicken Hb D exhibit Hill coefficients that are less than two in the absence of all organic phosphates (54). Glnalpha 38 is present in 27 out of the 40 avian alpha  sequences surveyed.

The Heme Regions-- The heme irons in chicken Hb D appear to be coordinated to either water or oxygen. Initially, it was assumed that the R-state model represented the aquomet form of Hb D and water molecules were modeled into the electron density located near the heme iron from each Hb subunit. Following four rounds of refinement and model fitting, each water moved to a position that is 2.9 Å away from the iron, allowing the water to hydrogen bond to the distal histidine. Although this distance is consistent with that observed in the structure of the aquomet form of Chironomous thummi Hb (55), the water-to-iron distance of chicken Hb D differs from the corresponding values observed both in the structure of horse aquomet Hb (30) and in the high resolution structures of ferric porphyrins complexed with water ligands (56, 57). Re-examination of the electron density from a set of simulated annealing 2Fo - Fc omit maps suggests that three of the four subunits are ligated to oxygen and the fourth (the alpha 2 subunit) is ligated to water (Fig. 3). An additional round of refinement allowed the O-1 atoms of the oxygen ligands of the beta  subunits to move to 1.8 Å from the heme iron and the oxygen ligand of the alpha 1 subunit to refine to 1.7 Å from the heme iron. The orientation of the oxygen ligands from the two beta  subunits differ. The Fe·O1·O2 angles for the beta 1 and beta 2 subunits are 138° and 173°, respectively. The water ligand of the alpha 2 subunit refined to 1.8 Å from the heme iron, shorter than the ~2.0 Å values observed in horse aquomet Hb (30). It would be unusual for the two alpha  subunits to have different ligands. The ligand assignments based on the electron density at 2.3-Å resolution must be considered as tentative. Nevertheless, this model provides the best fit to the simulated annealing omit map (Fig. 3).


View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   The heme pockets for the alpha 1 (top) and alpha 2 (bottom) subunits. The hemoglobin model is superimposed upon the electron density as calculated from a sigma A weighted (75), simulated annealing omit 2Fo - Fc map in which both of the alpha  heme groups were omitted from the map calculation. The alpha 1 heme appears to be ligated to an oxygen molecule and the alpha 2 heme is best fit with a water as the ligand.

The heme groups of the alpha  and beta  subunits of chicken Hb D resemble those of the ligated forms of other vertebrate Hbs (Table II) in that the iron atoms all lie near the plane of the heme atoms (defined by all heme atoms excluding those in non-planar side chains). The iron atoms of each subunit are approximately 0.2 Å out of the heme plane toward the proximal histidine. These values can be contrasted to the corresponding distances observed in human deoxy-Hb. In the absence of a ligand, the hemes of deoxy-Hbs should have iron-to-heme plane distances between 0.5 and 0.6 Å. The heme groups of chicken Hb D, as in all known Hbs, are ligated to the Nepsilon -2 of the proximal histidine from each subunit (His87 in the alpha  subunits and His92 in the beta  subunits). Each heme fits into a pocket lined with several hydrophobic residues. In chicken Hb D, the heme pockets of the alpha  subunits are formed from 17 residues and those of the beta  subunits are formed from 16 residues. All of the residues that contact the heme groups in the alpha  subunits are conserved in human Hb. The only difference between the beta  heme pockets of chicken and human Hbs is the substitution of Serbeta 70(E14) in chickens with Alabeta 70 in humans. This difference is probably not significant because serine is found at this position in the beta  subunits of other mammalian Hbs. Thus the heme pockets of chicken Hb D show no differences from other vertebrate Hbs which could account for the super-cooperativity of chicken blood.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
The geometry of the heme groups from chicken oxy-Hb D, goose oxy-Hb A (31), and human oxy-Hb (25)
For comparison, the geometric parameters of the unliganded heme from the structure of human deoxy-Hb (26) are also included. Unless specified, the values reported for chicken oxy-Hb D, goose oxy-Hb A, and human deoxy-Hb represent the mean value calculated from the two alpha beta dimers present in the asymmetric unit.


    DISCUSSION

Inositol Hexaphosphate-binding Site-- Organic phosphates lower the oxygen affinity of vertebrate Hbs by preferentially binding to the T-state of the tetramer (58, 59). The major organic phosphate in human red blood cells is bisphosphoglycerate, whereas that in chicken erythrocytes is inositol pentaphosphate (60). Most in vitro studies utilize the more readily available IHP. Both human and chicken Hbs bind IHP in a maximum ratio of 1 molecule of IHP per Hb tetramer (61). The crystallographic analysis of human Hb complexed with IHP indicates that IHP binds in a surface cavity formed between the two beta  subunits, the same site which also binds bisphosphoglycerate (62). In this crystal structure, the IHP-binding site includes the amino terminus of Valbeta 1(NA1) as well as the side chains of Hisbeta 2(NA2), Lysbeta 82(EF7), Asnbeta 139(H17), and Hisbeta 143(H21) from both beta  subunits (62).

Chicken Hbs A and D bind organic phosphates more tightly than do mammalian Hbs. The oxy and deoxy forms of human Hb at pH 6.8 bind bisphosphoglycerate with association constants of 1.2 × 103 M-1 and 1.7 × 104 M-1, respectively (63). The CO R-state of chicken Hb A at pH 7.0 binds bisphosphoglycerate with an association constant of 1 × 104 M-1 (61), which is approximately the same as human deoxy-Hb. Similarly, the oxy form of a related avian Hb (Hb A from bar-headed goose) binds IHP with an affinity similar to that of human deoxy-Hb (64). Both the R- and T-states of chicken Hb bind IHP more tightly than the equivalent forms of human Hb, although the IHP binding constants were reported to be too large to be measured (61). The increase in the organic phosphate affinity of chicken and bar-headed goose Hbs over human Hb may be attributed to the substitution of 3 basic residues found in the beta  subunits of most avian Hbs. The replacement of Alabeta 135(H13), Asnbeta 139(H17), and Hisbeta 143(H21) in human Hb with Argbeta 135, Hisbeta 139, and Argbeta 143 in chicken Hb increases the positive charge of the phosphate binding cavity (62).

The organic phosphate-binding site of the R-state of chicken Hb D does not allow IHP to fit easily into its normal binding site. A reasonable model of chicken oxy-Hb with IHP can be made by moving the organic phosphate 4.5 Å toward the Hb surface, enabling IHP to interact with the amino terminus as well as the side chains of Lysbeta 82 and Argbeta 143 from one beta  subunit and the side chains of Lysbeta 82, Hisbeta 139, and Argbeta 143 from the second beta  subunit (Fig. 4A). The R- to T-state transition opens up this cavity in most vertebrate Hbs. A deoxy model of chicken Hb D based on human Hb·IHP permits IHP to enter the phosphate-binding cavity. This position of IHP allows the side chains of Hisbeta 2, Lysbeta 82, Argbeta 135, Hisbeta 139, and Argbeta 143 combined with the amino termini of both beta  subunits to interact with five of the six phosphate groups of IHP (Fig. 4B). These models suggest that His-beta 139 (H17) and Argbeta 143(H21) might increase the IHP affinity of both forms of avian Hb whereas Argbeta 135(H13) increases the IHP affinity of only the deoxy form.


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   A computer model of IHP binding to the R-state (top) and T-state (bottom) of chicken Hb D. The T-state model of the chicken Hb D·IHP complex is based on the human deoxy-Hb·IHP complex (62). The R-state Hb D·IHP complex consists of the oxy-Hb structure with IHP moved 4.5 Å away from its T-state binding site. Note that the side chains of His2 and Arg135 are not positioned to interact with IHP in the R-state model whereas these residues can interact with the organic phosphate effector in the T-state model.

Relationship between IHP and Super-cooperativity-- Although a number of oxygen binding studies have been performed on purified chicken Hbs, there are no reports of super-cooperativity in vitro. The lack of in vitro evidence for super-cooperativity of adult Hbs prompted us to re-examine the published oxygen binding curves of chicken Hbs A and D (54). The original oxygen binding data for chicken Hbs A and D were kindly provided by Dr. R. E. Isaacks. This particular data set was collected using the continuous recording method of Longmuir and Chow (65) with the modifications described by Lian et al. (66). Hbs A and D were purified by anion exchange chromatography. The oxygen-binding curves for Hbs A and D were measured in both the presence and absence of 2 mM IHP (54) at a Hb concentration of 1.7 mg/ml.

The original analysis of Isaacks et al. (54) reported Hill coefficients at 50% saturation. However, the functionally relevant values in Hbs which self-associate occur at higher oxygenation levels (67). Therefore, the O2-binding curves of chicken Hbs D and A were re-evaluated. The Hill coefficients were calculated as a function of oxygen saturation. Separate least-squares lines were fitted to the low oxygen saturation (<55% saturation) and high oxygen saturation (>= 55% saturation) points from each curve (Fig. 5). The slope of the line gives n, the Hill coefficient. In all oxygen binding curves of Hb D, the lower part of the curve is described by Hill coefficients that vary between 1.5 and 1.7. The Hill coefficient of the upper part of its O2-binding curve is also about 1.8 in the absence of all organic phosphate effectors (Hb D alone). The addition of 2 mM IHP to Hb D increases the Hill coefficient of the upper half of the oxygen-binding curve to 4.2 (Fig. 5A), demonstrating that super-cooperativity does occur in vitro. Unexpectedly, the Hill plots of chicken Hb A behaved similarly. The upper half of Hill plots for the oxygen binding of Hb A showed elevated levels of cooperativity in the presence of 2 mM IHP whereas the lower half of the plot showed Hill coefficients of 1.6 (Fig. 5B). The lack of super-cooperativity observed for chicken Hb D in the absence of IHP is probably due to the low (102 µM heme) concentrations of Hb used in these experiments. Super-cooperativity of chicken Hb D would not be observed at this concentration because over 69% of deoxy-Hb D would exist as tetramers given the tetramer-octamer association constant of 1.26 × 104 M-1 measured by sedimentation velocity measurements (20). However, over 92% of deoxy-Hb D would associate into octamers at Hb concentrations (~300 mg/ml) normally found in chicken red blood cells. The observation of enhanced cooperativity in chicken Hb samples with IHP suggests that this process is linked to the binding of inositol pentaphosphate in vivo. This result also implies that IHP aids the formation of (alpha D2beta 2)2 octamers. The increased stability of the tetramer-tetramer interaction would allow the (alpha 2beta 2)2 to be maintained in partially ligated structures, thereby promoting super-cooperativity. Additional work will be required to measure the effect of IHP on the tetramer to octamer association constant.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Hill plots of the oxygen-binding data reported by Isaacks et al. (54). The plot of the Hb D data (A) in the absence of IHP () gives Hill coefficients of 1.8 over a wide range of oxygen saturation. In contrast, the upper region of the Hill plot for samples of Hb D in the presence of IHP (black-square) is described by a Hill coefficient of 4.2, indicating that IHP binding is linked to the super-cooperativity observed in chicken blood. Hill plots for the oxygen-binding curves of chicken Hb A (B) indicate that this component also exhibits super-cooperativity in the presence of IHP (black-diamond ).

It should be mentioned that the oxygen-binding measurements of Isaacks et al. (54) suffer from two possible sources of error. The first possible source of error is due to the assumption that both the production of oxygen by the electrode and the consumption of oxygen by beef heart mitochondria are linear processes. The original analysis of Longmuir and Chow (65) demonstrated that both of these assumptions were true in the absence of organic phosphates. However, it is not known if both the oxygen production and oxygen consumption processes of this experiment are truly linear when IHP is added to the sample. The second source of possible error is due to an incomplete saturation of the Hb sample. It has been demonstrated that artificially high Hill coefficients occur when the 100% saturation point is underestimated (15-17). This problem is particularly applicable to chicken Hbs because of their low oxygen affinity. The 100% saturation point for the oxygen binding analysis of Isaacks et al. (54) was estimated with oxygen saturation points measured at relatively high oxygen pressures (~265 torr). The 100% saturation point of this analysis can be underestimated by values between 4 and 7% without reducing the Hill coefficients of the Hb D-IHP and Hb A-IHP samples to values below 4.0.

The Interface between Deoxy-Hb D Tetramers-- The interface between two Hb D tetramers originally was thought to involve the EF corners from the alpha D subunits of the two interacting tetramers. This model is based on three surface residues, Lysalpha 71(EF1), Glnalpha 78(EF8), and Glualpha 82(F3) which are conserved in the alpha D chains but not in the alpha A chains (20). Despite the fact that in the absence of IHP, only the Hb D component self-associates (20), the observation of super-cooperativity in both chicken Hbs suggest that the proposed model of the alpha D-alpha D interface may be incorrect. However, the sedimentation experiments of Cobb et al. (20) indicate that the alpha  chains do influence the tetramer-tetramer interaction. The correct model of the tetramer-tetramer interface will require the crystallographic analysis of the T-states of either Hb A or Hb D. Crystals of what should be deoxy-Hb D were obtained that diffract to 6.0-Å resolution when exposed to x-rays produced by a rotating anode generator. Unfortunately, the resulting diffraction pattern could not be indexed due to the presence of crystal plating, and the evidence of 1 unit cell axis which is greater than 300 Å. Nevertheless, a significant amount of information has been inferred from the structural analysis of the R-state of Hb D.

The interface between two deoxy-Hb D tetramers should resemble that observed in the structures of other oligomeric proteins. Analysis of the high-resolution structures of 23 oligomeric proteins shows that a higher percentage of hydrophobic residues are found at the subunit interfaces than are normally located on the surface of the protein (68, 69). Therefore, large, hydrophobic residues (Leu, Ile, Met, Val, Cys, Tyr, and Trp) which are located on the surface of Hb D might contribute to the formation of the tetramer-tetramer interface. Table III lists the 10 hydrophobic residues that have at least 40 Å2 of solvent-exposed surface area. The alignments of the alpha  and beta  chains of Hbs A and D from birds and Hb A from humans revealed that 8 of these residues are retained in many avian Hbs. Three of these residues (Tyralpha 89, Leubeta 10, and Metbeta 59) have small aliphatic or hydrophilic counterparts in human Hb A, suggesting that Tyralpha 89, Leubeta 10, or Metbeta 59 might participate in tetramer-tetramer association. A large, hydrophobic residue (either a phenylalanine or tyrosine) is present at alpha 89 in all 20 alpha D chains, but is replaced with either a glutamine or histidine in most avian and mammalian alpha A chains, respectively. It seems less likely that this residue directly contributes to the association process because both chicken Hbs A and D exhibit super-cooperativity in the presence of IHP. The other two hydrophobic surface residues, Leubeta 10(A7) and Metbeta 59(E3), are found in all but three avian Hbs. Leubeta 10 and Metbeta 59 are replaced in human Hb by an alanine and lysine, respectively. It is well known that the replacement of a single polar residue by a hydrophobic residue in sickle cell anemia can cause human Hb to polymerize (70). Therefore, it is possible that the tetramer-tetramer interface involves one or more of these hydrophobic surface residues.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III
The hydrophobic residues located on the surface of chicken oxy-Hb D
The hydrophobic residues with a solvent exposed surface area greater than 40 Å2 are listed with the equivalent residues from other avian Hb D and A sequences. Residues in upper case represent the most common residue at this position. For comparison, the equivalent residues from human Hb A are included.

An alternative method for locating the tetramer-tetramer interface is to analyze the electrostatic surface potential for chicken deoxy-Hb D. A hypothetical deoxy model was constructed by superimposing each of the alpha beta dimers onto the corresponding subunits of human deoxy-Hb. The computer program GRASP (51) was used to calculate the surface potentials of the deoxy-Hb D and human deoxy-Hb structures. The most distinctive feature of the surface of chicken Hb D is a large patch of positive charge that corresponds to the IHP-binding site located between the two beta  subunits (Fig. 6A). A similar positive patch is seen in human Hb (Fig. 6C), but the positive charge is clearly less intense. The increased positive charge allows chicken Hbs to have a greater affinity for organic phosphates than human Hb A as discussed above.


View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Two views of the electrostatic surfaces of a computer model of deoxy-Hb D. A and B, compared with that of the human Hb structure (C and D). Views shown are looking into the organic phosphate-binding site (A and C) and looking at the oval-shaped protrusion formed by the D and E helices (B and D). The regions of each surface with negative charge, no charge, and positive charge are shown in red, white, and blue, respectively. Compared with human Hb, the surface of the chicken Hb model has a greater number of positively charged residues near its organic phosphate-binding site and a lack of charge present on the surface formed by the D and E helices.

The surface formed by parts of the D and E helices of the beta  subunits from the chicken Hb D model (residues 45-59) is also significantly different from that of human Hb. This surface in the chicken deoxy-Hb D model appears as an uncharged, oval-shaped protrusion, surrounded by patches of charged residues (Fig. 6B). An apolar patch is also present on the surface of Hb A of the bar-headed goose. Unfortunately, it is not known if bar-headed goose Hb exhibits super-cooperativity in the presence of IHP or if goose Hb A self-associates. The same region in human Hb has a similar shape, but includes several charged residues (Fig. 6D). The hydrophobic surface formed by residues 45-59 of the chicken beta  subunits is the region most likely to participate in contacts between two deoxy-Hb tetramers. An interface involving these residues also makes good chemical sense because this interface would include Leubeta 55(D6) and Metbeta 59(E3), two hydrophobic residues which would be expected to contribute favorably to the formation of an interface between two Hb D tetramers. Additional contacts may also be involved.

Possible Mechanism for Super-cooperativity-- Super-cooperativity in chicken Hbs depends on the formation of a tetramer-tetramer interface which further shifts the conformation to a lower oxygen-affinity state and thus could mediate cooperativity additional to that observed within the alpha 2beta 2 tetramers. Lamprey Hb also exhibits a deoxygenation-linked self-association (71-74) which involves interactions between E helices.2 The cooperative mechanism of chicken Hbs could be similar to that observed in Lamprey Hb2 because the proposed hydrophobic interface is formed by parts of the D and E helices and is located close to the distal histidine. We propose that formation of the tetramer-tetramer interface in chicken Hbs mediates a shift in the E helix of a beta  subunit in such a way that the distal histidine is pushed further into the heme pocket as it is in lamprey deoxy-Hb.2 The resulting position of the distal histidine would hinder oxygen binding, thereby reducing the oxygen affinity of this subunit. The binding of oxygen to one of the beta  subunits would require that the distal histidine move back to an R-state position, thus disrupting the tetramer-tetramer interface and producing alpha 2beta 2 tetramers of increased oxygen affinity. Experiments are now underway to test this model by crystallizing the deoxy forms of chicken Hbs A and D to define the tetramer-tetramer interface that gives rise to super-cooperativity.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to Dr. Elisabeth Karpova for crystallization of deoxy-Hb D and Dr. Diane McCarthy for helpful comments on the preparation of this manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Texas Advanced Research Grant 003658-189 (to M. L. H.), Robert A. Welch foundation Grant 1219 (to M. L. H.), and National Science Foundation Grant MCB-9723825 (to A. F. R.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The atomic coordinates and structure factors of Hb D (code 1hbr) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712. Tel.: 512-471-1105; Fax: 512-471-8696; E-mail: m.hackert{at}mail.utexas.edu.

2 H. Heaslet and W. E. Royer, private communication.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: Hb, hemoglobin; IHP, inositol hexa- phosphate; NCS, noncrystallographic symmetry; r.m.s., root mean square.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
References
  1. Lutz, P. L., Longmuir, I. S., and Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1974) Respir. Physiol. 20, 325-330[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Hirsowitz, L. A., Fell, K., and Torrance, J. D. (1977) Respir. Physiol. 31, 51-62[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Baumann, R., Padeken, S., and Haller, E.-A. (1982) J. Appl. Physiol. 53, 1439-1448[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Lapennas, G. N., and Reeves, R. B. (1983) Respir. Physiol. 52, 13-26[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Lapennas, G. N., and Reeves, R. B. (1983) Respir. Physiol. 52, 27-39[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Lykkeboe, G., and Johansen, K. (1978) Respir. Physiol. 35, 119-127[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Johansen, K., Lykkeboe, G., Kornerup, S., and Maloiy, G. M. O. (1980) J. Comp. Physiol 136, 71-76
  8. Tam, L.-T., and Riggs, A. F. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 2610-2616[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. MacMahon, I. A., and Hamer, A. (1975) Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 51A, 59-69
  10. Berner, N. J., and Ingermann, R. L. (1988) J. Exp. Biol. 140, 437-453
  11. Johansen, K., Berger, M., Bicudo, J. E. P. W., Ruschi, A., and De Almeida, P. J (1987) Physiol. Zool. 60, 269-278
  12. Holland, R. A. B., Rimes, A. F., Comis, A., and Tyndale-Biscoe, C. H. (1988) Respir. Physiol 73, 69-86[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Holland, R. A. B., Calvert, S. J., and Gemmell, R. T. (1991) Proc. Aust. Physiol. Pharmacol. Soc 22, 117P
  14. Holland, R. A. B., and Calvert, S. J. (1994) Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 345, 159-165[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Lapennas, G. N., Colacino, J. M., and Bonaventura, J. (1981) Methods Enzymol. 76, 449-470[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Vorger, P. (1987) Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 88, 613-618[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Vorger, P. (1994) Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B 109, 391-406
  18. Bårdgard, A., Fago, A., Malte, H., and Weber, R. E. (1997) Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B 117, 225-231[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Moss, B. A., and Thompson, E. O. P. (1969) Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 22, 1455-1471
  20. Cobb, J. A., Manning, D., Kolatkar, P. R., Cox, D. J., and Riggs, A. F. (1992) J. Biol. Chem 267, 1183-1189[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Perutz, M. F. (1970) Nature 228, 726-739[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Perutz, M. F., Fermi, G., Luisi, B., Shaanan, B., and Liddington, R. C. (1987) Acc. Chem. Res 20, 309-321
  23. Muirhead, H., and Perutz, M. F. (1963) Nature 199, 633-639[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Baldwin, J. M. (1980) J. Mol. Biol. 136, 103-128[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Shaanan, B. (1983) J. Mol. Biol. 171, 31-50[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Fermi, G., Perutz, M. F., Shaanan, B., and Fourme, R. (1984) J. Mol. Biol. 175, 159-174[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Perutz, M. F., Rossmann, M. G., Cullis, A. F., Muirhead, H., Will, G., and North, A. C. T. (1960) Nature 185, 416-422
  28. Bolton, W., Cox, J. M., and Perutz, M. F. (1968) J. Mol. Biol. 33, 283-297[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Heidner, E. J., Ladner, R. C., and Perutz, M. F. (1976) J. Mol. Biol. 104, 707-722[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Ladner, R. C., Heidner, E. J., and Perutz, M. F. (1977) J. Mol. Biol. 114, 385-414[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Zhang, J., Hua, Z., Tame, J. R. H., Lu, G., Zhang, R., and Gu, X. (1996) J. Mol. Biol. 255, 484-493[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Jancarik, J., and Kim, S.-H. (1991) J. Appl. Cryst. 24, 409-411
  33. McPherson, A. (1990) Eur. J. Biochem. 189, 1-23[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Xuong, N. H., Nielsen, C., Hamlin, R., and Anderson, D. (1985) J. Appl. Cryst. 18, 342-350
  35. Howard, A. J., Nielsen, C., and Xuong, N. H. (1985) Methods Enzymol. 114, 452-472[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Brünger, A. T. (1992) X-PLOR Manual, Version 3.1, Yale University, New Haven, CT
  37. Brünger, A. T (1990) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 46, 46-57[CrossRef]
  38. Brünger, A. T. (1992) Nature 355, 472-475[CrossRef]
  39. Engh, R. A., and Huber, R. (1991) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 47, 392-400[CrossRef]
  40. Powell, M. J. D. (1976) Math. Prog. 11, 42-49
  41. Brünger, A. T., Kuriyan, J., and Karplus, M. (1987) Science 235, 458-460
  42. Brünger, A. T., Krukowski, A., and Erickson, J. W. (1990b) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 46, 585-593[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Jones, T. A., Zou, J.-Y., Cowan, S. W., and Kjeldgaard, M. (1991) Acta Crystallogr. Sect A 47, 110-119[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Laskowski, R. A., MacArthur, M. W., Moss, D. S., and Thornton, J. M. (1993) J. Appl. Cryst 26, 283-291
  45. Hodel, A., Kim, S.-H., and Brünger, A. T. (1992) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 48, 851-858[CrossRef]
  46. Collaborative Computational Project Number 4. (1994) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 50, 760-763[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Kleywegt, G. J. (1996) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 52, 842-857[CrossRef]
  48. Lee, B., and Richards, F. M. (1971) J. Mol. Biol. 55, 379-400[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Kraulis, P. J. (1991) J. Appl. Cryst. 24, 946-950
  50. Smith, T. (1992) J. Appl. Cryst. 26, 496-498
  51. Nicholls, A., Sharp, K. A., and Honig, B. (1991) Proteins 11, 281-296[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  52. Benson, D. A., Boguski, M., Lipman, D. J., and Ostell, J. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 3441-3444[Abstract]
  53. Silva, M. M., Rogers, P. H., and Arnone, A. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 17248-17256[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Isaacks, R. E., Harkness, D. R., Adler, J. L., and Goldman, P. H. (1976) Arch. Biochem. Biophys 173, 114-120[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  55. Steigemann, W., and Weber, E. (1979) J. Mol. Biol. 127, 309-338[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. Körber, F. C. F., Smith, J. R. L., Prince, S., Rizkallah, P., Reynolds, C. D. & Shawcross, D. R. (1991) J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 3291-3294
  57. Cheng, B., Safo, M. K., Orosz, R. D., Reed, C. A., Debrunner, P. G., and Scheidt, W. R. (1994) Inorg. Chem. 33, 1319-1324
  58. Benesch, R., and Benesch, R. E. (1967) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 26, 162-167[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  59. Perutz, M. F. (1970) Nature 228, 734-739
  60. Isaacks, R. E., and Harkness, D. R. (1980) Am. Zool. 20, 115-129
  61. Brygier, J., De Bruin, S. H., Van Hoof, P. M. K. B., and Rollema, H. S. (1975) Eur. J. Biochem 60, 379-383[Abstract]
  62. Arnone, A., and Perutz, M. F. (1974) Nature 249, 34-36[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  63. de Bruin, S. H., Rollema, H. S., Lambert, H. M., van Os, J., and van Os, G. A. J (1974) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 58, 204-209[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  64. Rollema, H. S., and Bauer, C. (1979) J. Biol. Chem. 254, 12038-12043[Abstract]
  65. Longmuir, I. S., and Chow, J. (1970) J. Appl. Physiol. 28, 343-345[Free Full Text]
  66. Lian, C.-Y., Roth, S., and Harkness, D. R. (1971) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 45, 151-158[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  67. Gill, S. J., Sköld, R., Fall, L., Shaeffer, T., Spokane, R., and Wyman, J. (1978) Science 201, 362-364[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  68. Janin, J., Miller, S., and Chothia, C. (1988) J. Mol. Biol. 204, 155-164[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  69. Janin, J., and Chothia, C. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 16027-16030[Free Full Text]
  70. Harrington, D. J., Adachi, K., and Royer, W. E., Jr. (1997) J. Mol. Biol. 272, 398-407[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  71. Briehl, R. W. (1963) J. Biol. Chem. 238, 2361-2366[Free Full Text]
  72. Behlke, J., and Scheler, W. (1970) FEBS Lett. 7, 177-179[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  73. Andersen, M. E. (1971) J. Biol. Chem. 246, 4800-4806[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  74. Andersen, M. E., and Gibson, Q. H. (1971) J. Biol. Chem. 246, 4790-4799[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  75. Read, R. J. (1986) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 42, 140-149[CrossRef]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.