Interaction of SeqA and Dam Methylase on the Hemimethylated Origin of Escherichia coli Chromosomal DNA Replication*

Sukhyun KangDagger §, Ho LeeDagger , Joo Seok HanDagger , and Deog Su HwangDagger §parallel

From the Dagger  Institute for Molecular Biology and Genetics, § Interdisciplinary Program of Genetic Engineering, and  Department of Microbiology, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Preferential binding of SeqA protein to hemimethylated oriC, the origin of Escherichia coli chromosomal replication, delays methylation by Dam methylase. Because the SeqA-oriC interaction appears to be essential in timing of chromosomal replication initiation, the biochemical functions of SeqA protein and Dam methylase at the 13-mer L, M, and R region containing 4 GATC sequences at the left end of oriC were examined.

We found that SeqA protein preferentially bound hemimethylated 13-mers but not fully nor unmethylated 13-mers. Regardless of strand methylation, the binding of SeqA protein to the hemimethylated GATC sequence of 13-mer L was followed by additional binding to other hemimethylated GATC sequences of 13-mer M and R. On the other hand, Dam methylase did not discriminate binding of 13-mers in different methylation patterns and was not specific to GATC sequences. The binding specificity and higher affinity of SeqA protein over Dam methylase to the hemimethylated 13-mers along with the reported cellular abundance of this protein explains the dominant action of SeqA protein over Dam methylase to the newly replicated oriC for the sequestration of chromosomal replication.

Furthermore, SeqA protein bound to hemimethylated 13-mers was not dissociated by Dam methylase, and most SeqA protein spontaneously dissociated 10 min after binding. Also, SeqA protein delayed the in vitro methylation of hemimethylated 13-mers by Dam methylase. These in vitro results suggest that the intrinsic binding instability of SeqA protein results in release of sequestrated hemimethylated oriC.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In the Escherichia coli chromosome, the adenine residues of GATC sequences are recognized and methylated by Dam methylase (1-3). The protein transfers a methyl group from a methyl donor, S-adenosylmethionine, to the 6-amino group of adenine residues in hemimethylated and unmethylated GATC sequences (4). Until methylated by Dam methylase, the newly replicated GATC sequences exist in a hemimethylated state that in the parental strand is methylated and in the nascent strand is not. Dam methylase is a monomer with a molecular mass of 31 kDa (5). Each E. coli cell possesses approximately 130 molecules of Dam methylase (5). Methylation of GATC sites by Dam methylase is implicated in regulation of E. coli chromosomal replication (6-10) and methyl-directed mismatch repair (11-13). Also, Dam function plays a role in regulation of certain genes such as dnaA (6, 14) and Mu mom (15).

Regulation of E. coli chromosomal replication is strict and occurs mainly at the origin of E. coli chromosomal replication, oriC (16, 17). Within the 245 base pairs of oriC are 11 repeats of GATC sequences (18); fully methylated oriC is active for initiation of replication, whereas hemimethylated oriC is inactive for initiation of replication (6, 8, 20). In E. coli with a doubling time of 30 min, methylation of oriC by Dam methylase is delayed for 13 min after replication (21). In seqA mutants, methylation occurs after only 5 min. These results indicate that the 8-min difference is in part caused by sequestration of oriC by SeqA protein encoded by seqA gene. SeqA preferentially binds to hemi- compared with fully and unmethylated oriC (22, 25). seqA null mutant exhibits asynchronious and increased chromosomal initiation, indicating that SeqA protein is a negative modulator of E. coli chromosomal replication (19, 21, 34). Also, SeqA protein was independently identified as a protein that bound to the hemimethylated bacteriophage P1 origin (22).

To understand the in vivo role of SeqA and Dam proteins on hemimethylated oriC, we studied biochemical functions of the two proteins on the three AT-rich 13-mer sequences termed L, M, and R containing four GATC sites at the left end of oriC (23). In addition, footprints demonstrate that SeqA protein binds hemimethylated GATC sequences.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Reagent-- Sources were as follows: [gamma -32P]ATP (5000 Ci/mmol), Amersham Pharmacia Biotech; poly(dI-dC) and Sephadex-G50, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech; long ranger polyacrylamide, FMC Corp. Bioproducts; T4 polynucleotide kinase, New England Biolabs Inc.; restriction and cloning enzymes, Promega; and nitrocellulose filter (HAWP, 0.45 µM), Millipore. Unless otherwise indicated, other reagents were purchased from Sigma.

Bacterial Strains and Plasmid DNAs-- The E. coli strain DH5alpha (24) for fully methylated plasmid DNA and GM3819(dam16:Kmr) (7) for unmethylated plasmid DNA were used for isolation of plasmid DNA. E. coli MC1061 (24) and BL21 (24) were used for the overproduction of Dam and SeqA proteins, respectively. The plasmids pSS1 (25), pBMA1 (26), pBAD18 (27), and pBluescript SK(+) (Stratagene) were previously described. To construct pBAD18-Dam, the coding region of Dam was obtained by polymerase chain reaction and inserted into the EcoRI and HindIII sites of vector pBAD18.

Proteins-- SeqA protein was purified from BL21(pLys, pSS1) as described previously (22, 25) with modifications. Following a 2-h induction after the addition of isopropyl-1-thio-beta -D-galactopyranoside to 0.5 mM at A600 = 0.4, cells were harvested by centrifugation, resuspended in suspension buffer (25 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.5), 1 mM EDTA, 10% sucrose, and 1 mM DTT,1) frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80 °C. On thawing, cells were autolysed by T7 lysozyme expressed from plasmid pLys. Lysis was augmented by the addition of 1/10 volume of lysis salts (2.5 M KCl, 0.2 M EDTA, 0.2 M spermidine, and 10 mM DTT). The autolysed cells were centrifuged for 45 min at 45,000 rpm in a Beckman 70Ti rotor. The supernatant was precipitated by the addition of 0.35 g/ml ammonium sulfate followed by centrifugation for 15 min in a Kontron A8.24 rotor and resuspended in buffer A (50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 5 mM EDTA, and 1 mM DTT). The resuspended material was dialyzed against buffer A containing 50 mM KCl and loaded onto a heparin-agarose column equilibrated with buffer A containing 50 mM KCl. SeqA protein was eluted by a linear gradient of 10 column volumes of 50 mM to 1 M KCl in buffer A. Active fractions determined in gel-shift assays were pooled and loaded onto a hydroxyapatite column equilibrated with buffer D (20 mM potassium phosphate (pH 6.8), 10% glycerol, 1 mM DTT, and 100 mM KCl). The column was washed with buffer D, then with buffer D containing 0.4 M ammonium sulfate. Near homogeneous and concentrated (1.38 mg/ml) SeqA protein was obtained by elution with buffer D containing 1 M ammonium sulfate.

Dam methylase was purified from MC1061 (pBAD18-Dam) as described previously (28) except the blue-Sepharose column was omitted.

Gel-shift Assay-- To obtain differently methylated duplex 13-mers (Fig. 1), synthesized oligonucleotides containing 13-mer regions were mixed with appropriate combinations, 32P-labeled with T4 polynucleotide kinase and [gamma -32P]ATP, heated, and annealed by slow cooling. The annealed 13-mers were separated from ATP by passing through Sephadex G-50 column.

Gel-shift assays were performed as described previously (26) with minor modifications. 20 µl of binding mixture contained 1 µg of poly(dI-dC) and 1.5 fmol of 32P-labeled hemimethylated 13-mers, unless indicated, in binding buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 50 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, and 10% glycerol). The indicated amounts of proteins were added and incubated for 20 min at 32 °C. The subsequent steps were performed as described previously (29).

Filter Binding Assay-- Filter binding assays were performed as described previously (30) with minor modifications. The indicated amounts of proteins were added to 20 µl of the binding mixture described under "Gel-shift Assay" and incubated for 20 min at 32 °C. The reactions were then filtered through nitrocellulose. Filters were washed with 200 µl of binding buffer, dried, and quantitated using a liquid scintillation counter.

1,10-Phenanthroline-Copper Ion Nuclease in Situ Footprinting-- 1,10-Phenanthroline-copper (II) (OP-Cu(II)) ion nuclease footprinting was performed as described previously (31) with minor modifications. The EcoRI/HindIII fragment of plasmid pBMA1 from E. coli (DH5alpha (dam+))or GM3819(dam-16:Kmr) (7) were dephosphorylated with calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase and 32P end-labeled either at the EcoRI or HindIII restriction site as described above. Unmethylated and methylated fragments were then mixed, and hemimethylated fragments were generated by heat denaturation and renaturation. A gel-shift assay described above was performed with 20 fmol of the fragment. After electrophoresis, the gel was immersed in 200 ml of 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), followed by addition of 20 ml of OP-Cu(II) solution (2 mM 1,10-phenanthroline and 0.45 mM CuSO4). The cleavage reaction was initiated by the addition of 20 ml of 58 mM 3-mercaptopropionic acid, followed by incubation for 8 min at room temperature. 20 ml of 28 mM 2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline was added to quench the cleavage reaction. Subsequent steps were performed as described previously (29).

In Vitro Methylation Assay-- The Dam methylation assay was performed as described previously (32). 500 fmol of indicated 13-mers was added to 20 µl of Dam assay mixture (0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 10 mM EDTA, 2.5 mM DTT, and 1.6 µM S-adenosyl-[methyl-3H]-methionine. Dam methylase was then added to the mixture, incubated at 37 °C, and filtered through Whatman DE81 paper. Filters were washed with 0.4 M ammonium bicarbonate, further washed with cold ethanol, dried, and quantitated using a liquid scintillation counter.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Preferential Binding of SeqA Protein to the Hemimethylated 13-mers-- Because there are 11 unique GATC sequences within oriC (18), it was first necessary to decrease the ambiguity of analyzing SeqA protein binding to these regions. This was accomplished by synthesizing un-, hemi-, and fully methylated 13-mer oligonucleotides containing 4 GATC sequences. Synthesized oligonucleotides were annealed to each other and used for this study unless otherwise indicated (Fig. 1). 20 µl of binding reaction mixture contained 0.08 ng (1.5 fmol) of 32P-labeled 13-mers and 1 µg of poly(dI-dC) as competitor DNA to prevent nonspecific binding.


View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   13-mer region of oriC. The 13-mer region of oriC studied contains 13-mer L, M, R, and four GATC sequences (23, 26). Oligonucleotides for the top and bottom strands were synthesized in forms of adenomethylated and unmethylated GATCs. For the adenomethylated residues in GATC sequences, N6-methyl deoxyadenosine beta -cyanoethylphosphoramidite (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) was used for oligonucleotide synthesis. The oligonucleotides were annealed to generate duplex DNA containing fully-, hemi- and unmethylated 13-mers.

In nitrocellulose filter binding assays, SeqA protein preferentially bound to hemimethylated 13-mers compared with fully or unmethylated 13-mers (Fig. 2A). Approximately 32 ng of SeqA protein was required to saturate the binding. Such preference of SeqA protein to hemimethylated 13-mers was also observed in gel-shift experiments (Fig. 2B). SeqA protein formed two distinct complexes with hemimethylated 13-mers, whereas fully or unmethylated 13-mers did not form any complex. Of the complexes, the fast migrating complex was formed at lower SeqA concentration, whereas the slow migrating complex was at higher concentration. Both bands were supershifted by the addition of SeqA antiserum, indicating that these complexes were in fact formed by binding of SeqA protein (Fig. 2C).


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Preferential binding of SeqA protein to hemimethylated 13-mers. A, filter binding assays were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures" using fully-, hemi-, or unmethylated 13-mers. One unit was defined as the activity that binds to a quarter of the input labeled probe. B, gel-shift assays were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures" using the indicated differently methylated 13-mers. The resulting complexes of SeqA and hemimethylated DNA were denoted as either fast migrating complex (Fast MC) or slow migrating complex (Slow MC). C) SeqA antiserum raised against rabbit was added to the gel-shift mixture containing hemimethylated 13-mers. Each lane contained 17 ng of SeqA protein. lane 1, SeqA protein only; lane 2, SeqA protein and 0.2 µl of pre-immune serum; lane 3, SeqA protein and 0.2 µl of SeqA antiserum.

The binding affinities of SeqA protein for differently methylated 13-mers were compared by challenging the binding of SeqA to labeled hemimethylated 13-mers with unlabeled and differently methylated 13-mers using filter binding assays (Fig. 3A). Binding of SeqA protein to hemimethylated 13-mers was reduced by competition with hemimethylated but not by fully or unmethylated 13-mers. These results also confirm the preferential binding of SeqA protein to hemimethylated 13-mers. The fast migrating complex, which was formed at lower SeqA concentrations (Fig. 2B), persisted at higher concentrations of unlabeled hemimethylated 13-mers compared with the slow migrating complex formed at higher SeqA concentrations (Fig. 3B). This result indicates that SeqA protein possesses different affinities for each binding site of hemimethylated 13-mers.


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Competition of SeqA binding to hemimethylated 13-mers with differently methylated 13-mers. Before the addition of 17 ng of SeqA protein, the indicated amount of unlabeled 13-mers was added to the reaction mixture containing labeled hemimethylated 13-mers, followed by incubation. The competition was measured using filter binding (A) or gel-shift assays (B).

Localization of the Tight Binding Site of SeqA Protein on the Hemimethylated 13-mers-- To localize SeqA binding sites on the hemimethylated 13-mers containing four GATC sequences, in situ footprinting was performed using the OP-Cu(II) complex as a chemical DNA cleavage agent (31). A gel-shift assay was performed with the hemimethylated 13-mers in which adenine residues of GATC sequence were methylated on either the top (Fig. 4A) or bottom strand (Fig. 4B). The 5'-ends of methylated strands were 32P-labeled. After treatment of the gel with OP-Cu(II), the DNA in each band was isolated and subjected to electrophoresis through a denaturing sequencing gel. Regardless of top or bottom strand methylation, the protected region in the fast migrating complex localized to the GATC sequence of the 13-mer L and its close sequences. In the slow migrating complex, additional protected regions appeared at the GATC sequences of the 13-mer M and R. These footprinting results imply that SeqA protein binds first to the hemimethylated GATC sequence of the 13-mer L and subsequently binds to the remaining hemimethylated GATC sequences.


View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   The binding of SeqA protein to hemimethylated GATC sequences. Free DNA (Free), fast migrating complex (Fast MC), and slow migrating complex (Slow MC) shown in Fig. 2B were analyzed by OP-Cu(II) footprinting as described under "Experimental Procedures." Hemimethylated 13-mers were 32P-labeled at the 5'-end of methylated top strand (A) or at the 5'-end of methylated bottom strand (B). L, M, and R indicate 13-mer L, M, and R, respectively. GATC sequences are denoted as boxes. G and C on the top indicate Maxam and Gilbert chemical sequencing reactions (24) of G and C, respectively.

Dissociation of SeqA Protein from the Hemimethylated 13-mers Is Not Affected by Dam Methylase-- Methylation of hemimethylated oriC by Dam methylase is delayed 8 min longer in wild type cells than in seqA mutants (21). To assess the contribution of SeqA protein to this delay, the binding stability of SeqA protein to hemimethylated 13-mers was determined.

After incubation of SeqA protein with 32P-labeled hemimethylated 13-mers without poly(dI-dC), a large excess of unlabeled hemimethylated 13-mers was added. At the indicated time, the residual complex was separated through filter binding (Fig. 5A) or gel-shift assays (Fig. 5, B and C). In filter binding assays, the half-life of SeqA protein bound to hemimethylated 13-mers was determined to be 4 min (Fig. 5A). In gel-shift experiments in which the complexes were separated (Fig. 5, B and C), the half-life of the fast migrating complex was determined to be 4 min, whereas the half-life of the slow migrating complex was 1.5 min. After 10 min, most of the bound SeqA protein was dissociated from the hemimethylated 13-mers.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   The stability of SeqA protein bound to hemimethylated 13-mers. The binding mixture containing 17 ng of SeqA protein was incubated for 10 min, and then 500 fmol of unlabeled hemimethylated 13-mers was added. At the indicated time, the reaction mixture was analyzed by filter binding (A) or gel-shift assay (B). C, the fast and slow migrating complexes (MC) in B were quantitated by using a FUJIX Bio-Imaging Analyzer (BAS1000). NP, no protein added.

Binding specificity of Dam methylase to un-, hemi-, and fully methylated 13-mers was also determined using filter binding assays (Fig. 6A). In contrast to SeqA protein, Dam methylase did not discriminate between the methylation status of 13-mers and bound equally to hemi-, fully, and unmethylated 13-mers. Also, the differently methylated 13-mers yielded identical patterns of shifted bands by Dam methylase in gel-shift assays (data not shown). Binding of Dam methylase was found to be nonspecific because Dam methylase did not discriminate between the number or existence of GATC sequences.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Dam methylase cannot dissociate SeqA protein bound to hemimethylated GATC sequences. A, filter binding assays were performed with differently methylated 13-mers. B, the binding reaction mixture containing 18 ng of SeqA protein, 1.5 fmol of 32P-labeled hemimethylated 13-mers, 1.6 µM of S-adenosylmethionine, and 1 µg poly(dI-dC) was incubated for 10 min. At the indicated time after the addition of 250 ng of Dam methylase or 500 fmol of unlabeled hemimethylated 13-mers, SeqA protein bound to hemimethylated 13-mers was analyzed in gel-shift experiments. C, the slow migrating complexes in B were quantitated as described in Fig. 5C. Relative intensity of slow migrating complex indicates the ratio of the unit of slow migrating complex in a reaction to the unit of slow migrating complex before the addition of Dam or cold 13-mers.

Because SeqA and Dam methylase both act on the same substrate, the possible dissociation of SeqA protein bound to hemimethylated 13-mers by Dam methylase was examined (Fig. 6, B and C). Incubation of 17 ng (39 nM) of SeqA protein with hemimethylated 13-mers and S-adenosylmethionine was followed by the addition of 250 ng (400 nM) of Dam methylase (Fig. 6B, left panel) or a large excess of unlabeled hemimethylated 13-mers (Fig. 6B, right panel). Re-binding of dissociated SeqA protein to the labeled probe was inhibited by methylation of the SeqA binding sites by Dam methylase. Re-binding could also be inhibited by the addition of a large excess hemimethylated 13-mers.

Migration of the fast migrating SeqA-13mer complex was close to one of the bands shifted by Dam methylase. Therefore, the slow migrating SeqA-13 mer complex was quantitated (Fig. 6C). The stability of the slow migrating complex in the presence of Dam methylase was similar to the stability obtained in the presence of unlabeled hemimethylated 13-mers. These results indicate that Dam methylase does not affect the stability of SeqA protein bound to hemimethylated 13-mers, although both SeqA and Dam methylase act on the same hemimethylated GATC sequence. Because the presence of a large excess amount of poly(dI-dC) in SeqA binding assays reduced the stability of both fast and slow migrating complexes in Fig. 6B, the half-life of the fast migrating complex determined in Fig. 6B was different from that in Fig. 5C.

Delay of Dam Methylation on Hemimethylated GATC Sequences by SeqA Protein-- Dam methylase catalyzes the conversion of unmethylated GATC to hemimethylated GATC and of hemi- to fully methylated GATC. Therefore, the effect of SeqA protein on Dam methylation in the 13-mer region of oriC was examined. Un- or hemimethylated 13-mers were incubated with or without SeqA protein, followed by the addition of Dam methylase and S-adenosyl-[methyl-3H]methionine (Fig. 7B). At the indicated time, incorporation of the [3H]methyl group into DNA was determined. In the absence of SeqA protein, the incorporation of the methyl group onto hemimethylated 13-mers was half that of unmethylated 13-mers. This is presumably because the available Dam methylation sites on the hemimethylated DNA were half the available sites on the unmethylated DNA. In the presence of SeqA protein, Dam methylation of unmethylated 13-mers was somewhat inhibited (Fig. 7A). This inhibition could be caused by the binding of SeqA protein to the intermediate hemimethylated GATC sequences produced by Dam methylase. When the hemimethylated 13-mers were bound by SeqA protein, Dam methylation was delayed (Fig. 7B). Because Dam methylase was unable to dissociate SeqA protein bound to hemimethylated 13-mers (Fig. 6B), the lag before methylation might be attributed to the time required for dissociation of SeqA protein because of intrinsic binding stability of the protein.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Delay of Dam methylation by SeqA protein. In vitro methylation assays were performed using un- (A) or hemimethylated 13-mers (B) as described under "Experimental Procedures." The reaction mixture containing 500 fmol of unmethylated or hemimethylated 13-mers was incubated for 10 min with or without 700 ng of SeqA protein. At the indicated time after the addition of 100 ng of Dam methylase, incorporation of 3H was measured.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

During replication of the E. coli chromosome, newly synthesized strands exist as unmethylated species until methylated by Dam methylase (21). In most regions of the chromosome, nascent strands are methylated immediately, but methylation of the nascent oriC strand, which contains 11 GATC sequences, is delayed for about 13 min, resulting in a hemimethylated state of oriC (21). Duration of this hemimethylated oriC is reduced to 5 min in seqA mutants (21). These results, along with studies demonstrating the preferential binding of SeqA protein to hemimethylated oriC (25), imply that SeqA protein is responsible for the maintenance of hemimethylated oriC.

Because oriC contains 11 repeats of GATC sequence (18), the complexity of binding kinetic analysis and localization of SeqA protein to hemimethylated oriC were reduced by using the 13-mer region of oriC containing only 4 GATC sequences (Fig. 1). Consistent with the results reported with oriC region (25) and bacteriophage P1 DNA (22), SeqA protein specifically bound to hemimethylated 13-mers (Fig. 2). Two differently migrating complexes formed by SeqA and hemimethylated 13-mers were separated in gel-shift assays, and their formation and stability were analyzed (Figs. 2-5). The fast migrating complex, which was produced at lower concentrations of SeqA protein, was formed by the binding of SeqA protein to the hemimethylated GATC sequence of 13-mer L and its close sequences. At higher concentrations of SeqA protein, additional binding to unoccupied hemimethylated GATC sites of the fast migrating complex by SeqA protein produced the slow migrating complex. Regardless of top or bottom strand methylation, binding modes of SeqA protein appeared to be similar in the OP-Cu(II) footprinting. Measurement of complex stability indicated that binding of SeqA protein to the GATC sequence of 13-mer L is tighter and more stable than to other GATC sequences in hemimethylated 13-mers. These results suggest that the flanking sequences as well as hemimethylation of GATC duplex DNA is a determinant for the binding of SeqA protein. It remains to be determined whether additional binding of SeqA protein is cooperative. Currently, we are analyzing if SeqA protein preferentially binds certain sites in hemimethylated oriC and dnaA promoter region.

It has been suggested that Dam methylase binds nonspecifically to DNA and diffuses along the duplex DNA until a GATC sequence is encountered (32). Dam methylase then transfers methyl group with equal efficiency to both hemi- and unmethylated DNA (33). Our studies, using differently methylated 13-mers (Fig. 6), showed that binding of Dam methylase to DNA is nonspecific and does not exhibit methylation specificity.

The binding of SeqA protein will compete with methylation by the Dam protein to the hemimethylated GATC sequences on newly replicated oriC. A single E. coli contains approximately 1,000 molecules of SeqA protein (25), whereas there are about 130 molecules of Dam methylase (5). Compared with Dam methylase, not only the abundance of SeqA protein but also the specific binding and higher affinity of SeqA protein to hemimethylated 13-mers (Figs. 2A and 6A) implies that SeqA binding dominates Dam methylation during oriC duplication. This process inhibits Dam methylation, a necessary event for the sequestration of oriC initiation. SeqA protein dissociated in vitro after 10 min with a half-life of 4 min (Fig. 5), which roughly matches with the 8-min delay of Dam methylation in seqA wild type compared with seqA mutant. Also, Dam methylase was unable to dissociate the bound SeqA protein on hemimethylated 13-mers (Fig. 6, B and C). These observations suggest that the spontaneous dissociation of SeqA protein will be followed by Dam methylation.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Gillian Newman for careful editing of this manuscript and Dr. Kirsten Skarstad for the gift of plasmid pSS1.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by grants from the Interdisciplinary Research Grant from Korea Science and Engineering Foundation and from Korea Research Foundation.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

parallel To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 82-2-880-7524; Fax: 82-2-874-1206.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: DTT, dithiothreitol; OP-Cu(II), 1,10-phenanthroline-copper (II).

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
  1. Marinus, M. G., and Morris, N. R. (1973) J. Bacteriol. 114, 1143-1150[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Bale, A., D'Alarcao, M., and Marinus, M. B. (1979) Mutat. Res. 59, 157-165[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Marinus, M. G. (1996) in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: Cellular and Molecular Biology (Neidhardt, F. C., ed), Vol. 1, pp. 782-791, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
  4. Geier, G. E., and Modrich, P. (1979) J. Biol. Chem. 254, 1408-1413[Abstract]
  5. Boye, E., Marinus, M. G., and Lobner-Olesen, A. (1992) J. Bacteriol. 174, 1682-1685[Abstract]
  6. Campbell, J. L., and Kleckner, N. (1990) Cell 62, 967-979[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Boye, E., and Lobner-Olesen, A. (1990) Cell 62, 981-989[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Landoulsi, A., Malki, A., Kern, R., Kohiyama, M., and Hughes, P. (1990) Cell 63, 1053-1063[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Kimura, T., Asai, T., Imai, A., and Takanami, M. (1989) Mol. Gen. Genet. 219, 69-74[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Smith, D. W., Garland, A. M., Herman, G., Enns, R. E., Baker, T. A., and Zyskind, J. W. (1985) EMBO J. 4, 1319-1326[Abstract]
  11. Wagner, R., and Meselson, M. (1976) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 73, 4135-4139[Abstract]
  12. Glickman, B. W., and Radman, M. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 77, 1063-1067[Abstract]
  13. Barras, F., and Marinus, M. G. (1989) Trends Genet. 5, 139-143[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Braun, R. E., and Wright, A. (1986) Mol. Gen. Genet. 202, 246-250[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Hattman, S. (1982) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 79, 5518-5521[Abstract]
  16. von Meyenberg, K., and Hansen, F. G. (1987) in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: Cellular and Molecular Biology (Neidhardt, F. C., ed), Vol. 2, pp. 1555-1577, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
  17. Kornberg, A., and Baker, T. A. (1992) DNA Replication, 2nd Ed., W. H. Freeman and Co., New York
  18. Zyskind, J. W., and Smith, D. W. (1986) Cell 46, 489-490[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Wold, S., Boye, E., Slater, S., Kleckner, N, and Skarstad, K. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 4158-4165[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Russell, D. W., and Zinder, N. D. (1987) Cell 50, 1071-1079[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Lu, M., Campbell, J. L., Boye, E., and Kleckner, N. (1994) Cell 77, 413-426[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Brendler, T., Abeles, A., and Austin, S. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 4083-4089[Abstract]
  23. Bramhill, D., and Kornberg, A. (1988) Cell 54, 915-918[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  25. Slaster, S., Wold, S., Lu, M., Boye, E., Skarstad, K., and Kleckner, N. (1995) Cell 82, 927-936[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Hwang, D. S., and Kornberg, A. (1990) Cell 63, 325-331[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Guzman, L., Belin, D., Carson, M. J., and Beckwith, J. (1995) J. Bacteriol. 177, 4121-4130[Abstract]
  28. Nwosu, V. U. (1992) Biochem. J. 283, 745-750[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Lee, Y. S., and Hwang, D. S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 83-88[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Hwang, D. S., and Kaguni, J. M. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 10633-10640[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Papavassiliou, A. G. (1994) in DNA-Protein Interactions: Principles and Protocols (Kneale, G. G., ed), pp. 43-78, Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ
  32. Herman, G. E., and Modrich, P. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 2605-2612[Free Full Text]
  33. Modrich, P. (1987) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 56, 435-466[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Boye, E., Stokle, T., Kleckner, N., and Skarstad, K. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 12206-12211[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.