Increased High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Defective Hepatic Catabolism of ApoA-I and ApoA-II, and Decreased ApoA-I mRNA in ob/ob Mice
POSSIBLE ROLE OF LEPTIN IN STIMULATION OF HDL TURNOVER*

David L. Silver, Xian-cheng Jiang, and Alan R. TallDagger

From the Division of Molecular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
References

Abnormalities of plasma high density lipoprotein (HDL) levels commonly reflect altered metabolism of the major HDL apolipoproteins, apoA-I and apoA-II, but the regulation of apolipoprotein metabolism is poorly understood. Two mouse models of obesity, ob/ob and db/db, have markedly increased plasma HDL cholesterol levels. The purpose of this study was to evaluate mechanisms responsible for increased HDL in ob/ob mice and to assess potential reversibility by leptin administration. ob/ob mice were found to have increased HDL cholesterol (2-fold), apoA-I (1.3-fold), and apoA-II (4-fold). ApoA-I mRNA was markedly decreased (to 25% of wild-type) and apoA-II mRNA was unchanged, suggesting a defect in HDL catabolism. HDL apoprotein turnover studies using nondegradable radiolabels confirmed a decrease in catabolism of apoA-I and apoA-II and a 4-fold decrease in hepatic uptake in ob/ob mice compared with wild-type, but similar renal uptake. Low dose leptin treatment markedly lowered HDL cholesterol and apoA-II levels in both ob/ob mice and in lean wild-type mice, and it restored apoA-I mRNA to normal levels in ob/ob mice. These changes occurred without significant alteration in body weight. Moreover, ob/ob neuropeptide Y-/- mice, despite marked attenuation of diabetes and obesity phenotypes, showed no change in HDL cholesterol levels relative to ob/ob mice. Thus, increased HDL levels in ob/ob mice reflect a marked hepatic catabolic defect for apoA-I and apoA-II. In the case of apoA-I, this is offset by decreased apoA-I mRNA, resulting in apoA-II-rich HDL particles. The studies reveal a specific HDL particle catabolic pathway that is down-regulated in ob/ob mice and suggest that HDL apolipoprotein turnover may be regulated by obesity and/or leptin signaling.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
References

In general, HDL1 levels are inversely related to atherosclerosis susceptibility in humans and mice (1, 2). The protective properties of HDL may be due to its role in reverse cholesterol transport and to antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects in the arterial wall (3). In humans, low HDL cholesterol levels may be associated with defects in synthesis or catabolism of the major HDL apolipoprotein, apoA-I, with catabolic defects being more common (4, 5). Low HDL is often accompanied by hypertriglyceridemia, obesity, and insulin resistance, and obese subjects characteristically have accelerated catabolism of HDL apolipoproteins (4). A common belief is that low HDL cholesterol reflects increased core lipid exchange between HDL and triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, leading to modifications of HDL composition and size that result in increased catabolism of HDL particles (6). HDL from hypertriglyceridemic subjects with low HDL is smaller and more susceptible to renal filtration and degradation (7).

However, the liver is one of the principal organs of HDL apolipoprotein degradation, and it is unclear how the hepatic catabolism of the major HDL apoproteins is regulated or mediated (8, 9). Recently, an authentic HDL receptor, scavenger receptor B-I (SR-BI), was identified (10). SR-BI mediates the selective uptake of HDL cholesteryl esters in the liver and steroidogenic tissues; however, SR-BI mice do not have defects in catabolism of HDL apoproteins (11, 12), indicating that this receptor is unlikely to mediate hepatic uptake of apoA-I and apoA-II.

Intriguingly, two monogenic mouse obesity models, ob/ob and db/db, have greatly increased plasma HDL cholesterol levels (13). This contrasts with obese humans with low HDL and other mouse models of obesity and diabetes, such as lethal yellow mice, tubby mice, and the brown adipose-ablated transgenic mouse UCP-DTA, all of which have normal HDL levels (13, 14). ob/ob mice were found to have a nonsense mutation in the leptin gene (15), and db/db mice were shown to have a splicing defect in the gene encoding the leptin receptor (16), resulting in defective leptin production and signaling, respectively. Because ob/ob and db/db represent specific mutations in leptin and its receptor, these findings suggested to us that leptin might play a role in the regulation of HDL apoprotein metabolism. As an initial step in investigating this hypothesis, we have characterized HDL apolipoprotein metabolism in ob/ob and db/db mice, and determined whether leptin deficiency is responsible for the high HDL levels.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Animals-- All mice used in these studies were female wild-type, ob/ob, and db/db mice of the pure inbred strain C57BL/6J (purchased from The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME). Mice were between the ages of 8 and 13 weeks old. All mice were fed chow diet. All mice were fasted for 4 h before plasma collections.

Lipoprotein Analysis-- Native gel electrophoresis was carried out on plasma from mice fasted for 4 h and separated on a 4-20% polyacrylamide gel (Lipo-Gel, Zaxis) and stained with Sudan Black. HDL size was determined using a high molecular weight calibration kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). HDL fractions (1.063 < rho  < 1.21) were isolated from fasted mice by buoyant density ultracentrifugation, and apolipoproteins were separated through a 4-20% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. Coomassie Blue-stained SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gels were destained, and proteins were quantified using scanning densitometry. Isolation of HDL by chemical precipitation (HDL reagent, Sigma) and enzymatic measurements (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.) was carried out according to the manufacturers' instructions.

Catabolic Assay-- HDL was radiolabeled with 125I-N-methyl tyramine cellobiose (500 cpm/ng), and 10 µg was injected into the femoral vein. Asialoglycophorin (Sigma) was conventionally labeled with 125I (600 cpm/ng), and 5 µg was injected in the femoral vein. Fractional catabolic rate was calculated by fitting a least squares multiexponential curve to each set of turnover data as previously described (17).

Leptin Treatment-- ob/ob, db/db, and lean wild-type mice were injected once daily with with either 0.3 µg/g of body weight of leptin (R&D Systems) or 1.0 µg/g of body weight. Control groups of ob/ob, db/db, and lean wild-type mice were injected once daily with saline. All mice were 8 weeks of age at the beginning of the experiments. Saline-injected mice were pair-fed along with the leptin-injected mice of the same genotype.

Northern Blot Analysis-- 10 µg of total liver RNA was hybridized with radiolabeled cDNAs of mouse apoA-I, apoA-II, and a 28 S oligonucleotide. ApoA-I and ApoA-II signal levels are reported under "Results" as ApoA-I or ApoA-II signal/28 S rRNA signal. 2.5 µg of liver poly(A+) RNA was hybridized with radiolabeled cDNAs of mouse SR-BI or LDL receptor. Both signal levels were standardized with a radiolabeled mouse B-actin cDNA. PhosphorImager analysis was used for all quantitations. Data were reported for all Northern blots as mean ± S.D. (arbitrary units).

Western Blot Analysis-- SR-BI protein levels in 50 µg of mouse liver membranes were detected using polyclonal antibodies against mouse SR-BI as described previously (18). SR-BI signals levels on x-ray film were quantified by scanning laser densitometry.

Hepatic Lipase and Phospholipid Transfer Protein (PLTP) Assays-- Both assays were performed as described previously (19, 20). Hepatic lipase assays and PLTP assays were performed on plasma from n = 5 and n = 10 (for each genotype) mice, respectively.

Statistical Analysis-- Probability values were calculated for each experiment using the Student t test.

    RESULTS

Apolipoprotein Composition and apoA-I and apoA-II mRNA Levels in ob/ob Mice-- Previous studies employed nonspecific precipitation methods to show increased HDL cholesterol in ob/ob and db/db mice (13). Fractionation of plasma lipoproteins from ob/ob mice by fast protein liquid chromatography confirmed a marked increase in the main peak of HDL relative to plasma from wild-type mice, as well as a shoulder in the region where a large subclass of HDL (HDL1) and LDL elute (Fig. 1A). Native gel electrophoresis of plasma from ob/ob and wild-type mice showed that ob/ob mice have an increased amount and size of HDL (mean increase in diameter, 0.4 nm) and increased HDL1, as well as decreased size, but an unchanged amount of LDL (Fig. 1B). Thus, the hypercholesterolemia of ob/ob mice is due to a marked increase in HDL and HDL1.


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Characterization of plasma lipoproteins and their expression levels in ob/ob, db/db, and wild-type mice. A, plasma lipoprotein cholesterol distribution as determined by fast protein liquid chromatography (19). Each profile represents pooled plasma from six wild-type () and six ob/ob (diamond ) mice fasted for 4 h. B, a representative native gel electrophoresis analysis of plasma from individual ob/ob (n = 3) and wild-type mice (n = 3). C, a representative SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis of HDL apoproteins from two individual wt, ob/ob, and db/db mice. D, a representative Northern blot analysis of hepatic RNA from duplicate ob/ob and wild-type mice.

The apoprotein composition of HDL was next determined in ob/ob and db/db mice. ApoA-II levels were 4-fold (ob/ob) and 3-fold (db/db) increased relative to wild-type mice (Fig. 1C, wt, 286 ± 26; ob/ob, 1136 ± 156; db/db, 788 ± 88 (mean ± S.D); p < 0.005; n = 6 for wt and ob/ob, n = 3 for db/db (arbitrary units)). A more modest elevation in apoA-I was also observed (Fig. 1C, 1.3- and 1.2-fold, respectively; p < 0.005). The marked increase in apoA-II correlates well with increased HDL cholesterol, as apoA-II levels are an important determinant of HDL cholesterol levels in mice (21). The increased plasma apoA-I and apoA-II protein levels in ob/ob mice were not due to increased expression of their respective genes (Fig. 1D): hepatic apoA-II mRNA abundance was similar to that of wild-type mice, and surprisingly, apoA-I mRNA levels were reduced 4-fold in ob/ob livers (Fig. 1D, wt, 0.047 ± 0.017; ob/ob, 0.01 ± 0.001 (mean ± S.D., arbitrary units); p < 0.05; n = 6 for each genotype).

HDL Apolipoprotein Clearance in ob/ob Mice-- The greatly increased plasma levels of apoA-II and, to a lesser extent, apoA-I with no change or an opposite change in their mRNA levels suggested that the increase in HDL is due to a catabolic defect of HDL apoproteins. To test this idea, the proteins of intact HDL particles from ob/ob mice were conjugated to a radioiodinated nondegradable tracer, N-methyl-tyramine cellobiose (22), and injected into groups of ob/ob and wild-type mice. Fig. 2A shows that the removal of the plasma HDL tracer in ob/ob mice was slower than in wild-type mice. The HDL protein fractional catabolic rate (17) was significantly decreased relative to wild-type mice (0.138 ± 0.029 and .067 ± 0.011 pools/h, respectively; p < 0.01). Moreover, the initial (0-4 h) plasma decay of both apoA-I and apoA-II was markedly reduced, with apoA-I levels decaying at a slower rate than apoA-II in ob/ob mice (Fig. 2B). The level of the HDL protein tracer in livers of ob/ob mice at the 24-h time point was profoundly reduced (4.3-fold) relative to wild-type livers (Fig. 2C). No significant difference in the HDL tracer levels were seen in kidneys of ob/ob and wild-type mice, suggesting that ob/ob mice have a HDL protein catabolic defect specific for the liver. The livers of ob/ob mice are moderately enlarged as a result of increased fat deposition (23). To eliminate the possibility that ob/ob mice have a more general defect in liver function resulting from increased liver weight, the activity of the well characterized hepatic receptor for asialoglycophorin was examined (24). Radioiodinated asialoglycophorin was injected into ob/ob and wild-type mice. Fig. 2D shows that the plasma clearance of asialoglycophorin was slightly faster in ob/ob mice relative to wild-type mice, with similar fractional catabolic rates (0.29 ± 0.04 and 0.21 ± 0.11, respectively). Taken together, these data indicate that ob/ob mice have a liver-specific defect in HDL protein catabolism.


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Analysis of HDL apoprotein metabolism in ob/ob and wild-type mice. A, kinetics of 125I-N-methyl tyramine cellobiose HDL (125I-NMTC HDL) plasma clearance. 125I-NMTC HDL was injected intravenously into five mice of each genotype. The percentage of radioactivity remaining in plasma (expressed as the mean ± S.E.) was determined at the times indicated (*, ob/ob versus wild-type, p < 0.05). Similar results were obtained in a separate experiment using conventionally labeled 125I-HDL (data not shown). B, kinetics of 125I-NMTC apoA-I and apoA-II plasma clearance. The HDL was isolated by ultracentrifugation from pooled plasma collected from samples shown in A and analyzed by SDSpolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and apoA-I and apoA-II bands were counted. Each data point represents the percentage of radioactivity remaining relative to time 0. C, amount of 125I-NMTC HDL remaining in liver and kidney at 24 h after the start of the experiment. Entire livers and kidneys were homogenized and the amount of radioactivity was reported as the mean radioactivity per g of tissue ± S.E. (*, ob/ob liver versus wild-type liver, p < 0.0001). D, plasma turnover of 125I-asialoglycophorin (ASGP). 125I-Asialoglycophorin was injected intravenously into three ob/ob and wild-type mice, and plasma radioactivity was measured at the indicated times and expressed as the mean percentage of radioactivity remaining ± S.E. relative to time 0.

Examination of Factors Known to Effect HDL Turnover-- Next, we examined the possibility that factors known to alter HDL catabolism might be altered in ob/ob mice. First, the level of the HDL receptor SR-BI was evaluated by Western blot analysis and found to be unchanged (Fig. 3A, ob/ob, 174 ± 55; wt, 151 ± 8 densitometric units; n = 6 for each genotype); SR-BI mRNA levels were also unchanged (Fig. 3B, wt, 1.9 ± 0.6; ob/ob, 1.9 ± 0.3 arbitrary units; n = 6 for each genotype). Second, the LDL receptor is known to catabolize large apolipoprotein E (apoE)-containing HDL particles (25). However, LDL receptor mRNA levels were found to be unchanged (Fig. 3A, wt, 0.38 ± 0.043; ob/ob, 0.39 ± 0.046 arbitrary units; n = 6 for each genotype). Third, the activity of hepatic lipase, an enzyme shown to promote the uptake of HDL by cultured hepatocytes (25), was found to be normal (wt, 3695 ± 311 cpm transferred/µl of plasma/h; ob/ob, 4284 ± 339 cpm transferred/µl of plasma/h). Fourth, the activities of PLTP (which circulates bound to HDL and mediates the transfer and exchange of phospholipids between different lipoproteins (19)) was found to be increased (wt, 203 ± 8 cpm transferred/µl of plasma/h; ob/ob, 397 ± 65 cpm transferred/µl of plasma/h; p < 0.001). However, PLTP mRNA levels in the liver of ob/ob mice were unchanged (data not shown). The increased PLTP activity, with no increase in PLTP mRNA, suggests that the increased activity is secondary to increased concentration of HDL particles. These data indicated that it is unlikely that these factors account for the high HDL level in ob/ob mice.


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   SR-B1 expression levels and LDL mRNA levels in ob/ob and wild-type mice. A, representative Western blot analysis of SR-BI protein levels in liver membranes from three ob/ob and three wild-type mice. B, representative Northern blot analysis of SR-BI and LDL receptor mRNA levels detected in poly(A+) RNA from individual mice of each genotype injected with saline or leptin for 14 days (S, saline; L, leptin). Three mice treated with leptin or saline (shown in Fig. 4D) were examined for SR-BI and LDL receptor mRNA levels.

Leptin Treatment of ob/ob and Lean Wild-type Mice-- These experiments indicate major defects in HDL metabolism in ob/ob mice: both decreased synthesis of apoA-I, as implied by decreased apoA-I mRNA, and decreased catabolism of apoA-I and apoA-II. To determine whether abnormalities of HDL were reversible with leptin treatment, low doses of leptin were injected into ob/ob and wild-type mice. Doses of leptin that are suboptimal for weight reduction were used throughout these studies so that no major effects of leptin on adiposity occurred, as measured by body weight. Fig. 4A shows that mice injected with leptin or saline (and pair-fed) had similar body weights during the course of the experiment (Fig. 4A), although leptin indeed reduced food intake (data not shown). Fasting levels of plasma HDL cholesterol in leptin-injected ob/ob mice were significantly decreased below levels in saline-injected ob/ob mice (Fig. 4B). After cessation of injections, HDL cholesterol rebounded to saline-injected levels. There was no decrease in plasma HDL cholesterol levels in leptin and saline-injected wild-type mice (Fig. 4B), nor in db/db mice injected with leptin (day 0, 90 ± 17 mg/dl; day 14, 86 ± 17 mg/dl). However, injection of 3-fold more leptin into wild-type and ob/ob mice resulted in a 25% decrease in HDL cholesterol in both groups (Fig. 4D), without a decrease in body weight in wild-type mice (Fig. 4C). Once again, db/db mice injected with leptin showed no decrease in plasma HDL cholesterol levels (day 0, 89 ± 4.2 mg/dl; day 14, 90 ± 7.3 mg/dl). At both lower (Fig. 4E) and higher (Fig. 4G) doses of leptin, the decrease in plasma HDL cholesterol in ob/ob mice was associated with a 50-60% decrease in HDL apoA-II levels, with no decrease in apoA-II in saline-injected ob/ob mice. Similarly, apoA-II levels were decreased by 45-50% in leptin-injected wild-type mice (Fig. 4, F and H). Leptin did not change steady state HDL apoA-I levels in ob/ob or wild-type mice (Fig. 4, E-H). These results indicate a substantial reversal of the increased HDL cholesterol and apoA-II by low dose leptin in ob/ob mice. Moreover, a parallel process occurred in wild-type mice at a 3-fold higher leptin dosage. That more leptin was necessary to cause a decrease in plasma HDL cholesterol in wild-type mice indicates that wild-type mice are less sensitive to the effects of leptin than are ob/ob mice, as previous reports suggested for body weight changes and as noted here (26-28). In addition, leptin treatment did not alter levels of either SR-BI or LDL receptor mRNA in livers of ob/ob and wild-type mice (Fig. 3B).


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Effects of leptin on HDL metabolism. Mice were injected intraperitoneally once daily with either 0.3 µg of human recombinant leptin per g of body weight (A, B, E, and F) or 1.0 µg/g (C, D, G, and H). Control mice were injected with saline and pair-fed along with leptin-injected mice. A, body weight was measured at the times indicated and expressed as mean ± S.E. (n = 5). B, plasma samples were isolated at the times indicated following a 4-h fast, and HDL was isolated by chemical precipitation. Total cholesterol content of HDL was measured and expressed as mean ± S.E. (n = 5; * p < 0.01). Arrows indicate the start and stop of all injections. C, body weight as determined in A (n = 4 for all groups of mice). D, HDL was isolated by chemical precipitation and total cholesterol was measured at time 0 and 7 and 14 days after the start of the experiment. Values are reported as mean ± S.E. (n = 4 for all groups of mice; *, leptin-injected versus saline-injected mice, p < 0.01). E-H, apoA-I and apoA-II were measured from HDL fractions (1.063 < rho  < 1.21) isolated from pooled plasma from each animal as described in Fig. 1B. Each data point represents the percentage remaining relative to time 0. E and F, open circle , A-II, saline; diamond , A-I, 0.3 µg/g leptin; , A-I, saline; triangle , A-II, 0.3 µg/g leptin. G and H, open circle , A-II, saline; diamond , A-I, 1.0 µg/g leptin; , A-I, saline; triangle , A-II, 1.0 µg/g leptin.

ApoA-I mRNA Levels after Leptin Treatment-- Although these findings could result if leptin reverses the catabolic defect of HDL proteins in ob/ob mice, apoA-I levels were unchanged by leptin treatment (Fig. 4, E-H). This may be explained if leptin also increases the low levels of apoA-I mRNA observed in ob/ob livers (Fig. 1D), thereby increasing apoA-I synthesis. Indeed, apoA-I mRNA from ob/ob mice treated with leptin was restored to levels of wild-type mice, whereas apoA-I mRNA levels in ob/ob mice treated with saline and db/db mice treated with leptin remained at a low level, with no change in apoA-II mRNA levels (Fig. 5). Thus, low dose leptin essentially normalized apoA-II levels (Fig. 4, E and G) and apoA-I mRNA (Fig. 5) in ob/ob mice. However, HDL cholesterol levels remained above wild-type levels (Fig. 4, B and D).


View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Leptin restores apoA-I mRNA levels in ob/ob mice. ApoA-I and apoA-II mRNA levels were determined in hepatic RNA isolated from mice at day 14 of the leptin injection experiment shown in Fig. 3, C, D,G, and H. Significant differences were measured for apoA-I mRNA levels between leptin-treated and saline-treated ob/ob and db/db mice (p < 0.003). There was no significant difference between wild-type mice (wt) (both leptin- and saline-treated) and ob/ob leptin-treated mice (p > 0.18).

HDL Cholesterol Levels in Neuropeptide Y (NPY-/-),ob/ob Mice-- The leptin administration studies showed that HDL abnormalities were partly reversible without changes in body weight. To further examine the relationship between HDL and obesity, we measured HDL levels in ob/ob NPY-deficient mice. Mice deficient in NPY and carrying the ob/ob mutation show a 51% reduction in adiposity and a marked attenuation of hyperphagy and diabetes-associated phenotypes caused by the ob/ob mutation (29). Therefore, we asked whether decreases in plasma insulin, glucose, and adiposity would have a proportional effect on HDL cholesterol levels in ob/ob mice. Despite the attenuation of obesity in npy-/- ob/ob mice (29), a lack of NPY on the ob/ob background did not reduce plasma HDL levels relative to the ob/ob mice carrying a functional npy gene (Fig. 6). Thus, significant decreases in obesity-related phenotypes do not appear to reduce the high HDL cholesterol levels in ob/ob mice.


View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   HDL cholesterol levels in ob/ob npy-/- mice. HDL was isolated by chemical precipitation from pooled plasma from littermates of the designated genotypes, and total cholesterol was measured enzymatically (wild-type (wt), n = 7; ob/ob, n = 23; ob/ob npy-/-, n = 13) (*, ob/ob and ob/ob npy-/- versus wild-type, p < 0.01). Values are expressed as the mean ± S.E.


    DISCUSSION

This study has revealed major alterations in the metabolism of apoA-I and apoA-II in ob/ob and db/db mice. In the case of apoA-I, a striking 4-fold decrease in apoA-I mRNA is offset by a comparable decrease in hepatic catabolism, so that plasma levels are only slightly elevated. Low dose leptin administration reversed the decrease in apoA-I mRNA in ob/ob mice, without changing plasma apoA-I levels. These findings, which imply that leptin enhances the turnover of plasma apoA-I, are reminiscent of its stimulation of glucose turnover without significant changes in plasma level (30). In contrast to apoA-I, hepatic apoA-II mRNA was unchanged; thus, a marked hepatic catabolic defect resulted in increased HDL apoA-II levels. In mice, increased plasma apoA-II levels are commonly associated with increased HDL cholesterol (21). Therefore, increased apoA-II may be the predominant factor responsible for increased HDL cholesterol in ob/ob mice. The parallel defects in hepatic catabolism of apoA-I and apoA-II provide novel evidence for a specific liver catabolic process that is down-regulated in ob/ob mice.

Although altered catabolism of HDL apoproteins commonly underlies variation in HDL cholesterol levels in humans (4, 5, 31), the regulation and molecular mechanisms of apolipoprotein catabolism are obscure. Our findings indicate a catabolic pathway for apoA-I and apoA-II that is liver-specific, down-regulated in ob/ob mice, and possibly regulated by leptin. A variety of factors that could potentially be responsible for these effects were excluded, including SR-BI levels, LDL receptor mRNA, hepatic lipase activity, and PLTP and hepatic PLTP mRNA levels. Other potential pathways include the LDL receptor-related protein (32) and an apoE-proteoglycan pathway (25). However, the phenotype of mice overexpressing the LDL receptor-related protein inhibitor RAP suggests that LDL receptor-related protein is unlikely to represent the major catabolic factor for apoA-I and apoA-II (33). Moreover, apoE accumulation was not particularly prominent in ob/ob or db/db mice (Fig. 1C), suggesting that it may not be the ligand primarily regulating HDL apoprotein metabolism in these animals. ob/ob mice do have increased lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity when measured relative to the entire adipose mass (34). LPL acts by hydrolyzing triglycerides from apoB-containing particles in plasma (35). However, mice overexpressing LPL do not show increases in HDL apolipoproteins (36). In addition, leptin has recently been shown to increase LPL expression in vivo (37); therefore, in our experiments to decrease HDL cholesterol, it is unlikely that LPL is responsible for the HDL phenotype in ob/ob mice. Thus, the parallel severe defects in apoA-I and apoA-II catabolism in ob/ob mice suggest down-regulation of a novel process, possibly a receptor, mediating HDL particle uptake in the liver.

Increased apoA-I gene expression in transgenic mice is associated with a potent, consistent anti-atherogenic effect in different mouse models (38, 39). The molecular mechanisms of regulation of apoA-I gene expression have been intensively studied, at both the transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels. The proximal 256 base pairs of the human apoA-I gene contain sufficient information to direct high level hepatic expression (40), and a number of transcription factors appear to be active on the proximal promoter, such as apoA-I regulatory protein-I (41), retinoid X receptor alpha  (42), thyroid hormone receptor (43), and early growth response factor I (44). Although a number of pharmacological and dietary factors may signal through these and other transcription factors to affect apoA-I levels, apoA-I gene expression has proven relatively insensitive to physiological change. Some of the states in which there is altered apoA-I gene expression in rodents include experimental hyperthyroidism (1.7-2.5-fold increased apoA-I mRNA) (45), and nephrotic syndrome (2-fold increased apoA-I mRNA) (44). High fat diets are also associated with a 40% increase in apoA-I synthesis, reflecting increased translational efficiency of apoA-I mRNA (46). The finding of a 4-fold decrease in apoA-I mRNA in ob/ob mice that is completely reversed by low dose leptin administration is notable and may indicate that leptin signaling pathways play a major role in vivo in the regulation of apoA-I synthesis.

ob/ob mice have multiple metabolic defects, including obesity, insulin-resistant diabetes, and hypercortisolism (47, 48). Potentially, any of these or other abnormalities in ob/ob mice could be responsible for the metabolic derangement of HDL apoprotein metabolism. Several lines of evidence indicate that the increased HDL levels of ob/ob mice are not solely and simply secondary to obesity or diabetes. First, several other obese diabetic mouse models do not have increased HDL levels (13, 49). Second, in the present study, compound ob/ob, NPY-/- mice had elevated HDL levels similar to ob/ob littermates, despite marked attenuation of diabetes and obesity (29). Third, a developmental study in ob/ob mice indicated that increased HDL levels precede the onset of severe obesity (13), and this has also been confirmed for the decrease in hepatic apoA-I mRNA levels.2 Fourth, a major part of the HDL abnormalities of ob/ob mice was reversed by low doses of leptin, beneath the threshold needed for weight reduction. Fifth, significant lowering of HDL cholesterol and apoA-II levels was produced in lean wild-type mice by leptin treatment, again without change in body weight. As to hypercortisolism, we have found that MCR4-/- mice, which are obese due to a defect in central leptin signaling, have an elevation in HDL cholesterol and apoA-II levels similar to that of ob/ob mice,2 and these animals do not have elevated plama corticosteroid levels (50). This ensemble of evidence suggests that there may be effects of leptin on HDL metabolism that are independent of diabetes, obesity, and hypercortisolism per se. However, because the reduction of HDL cholesterol in response to leptin administration was only partial in ob/ob mice (Fig. 4, B and D), there may be an independent effect of obesity on HDL levels that is not reversed without significant changes in body weight.

There are many differences in lipoprotein metabolism between mice and humans. These include the presence of cholesteryl ester transfer protein in humans, mediating core lipid exchange between HDL and triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (51), and the absence of a correlation between HDL cholesterol and apoA-II levels in human (4). However, it is striking that the high HDL phenotype of ob/ob mice is opposite that observed in humans. Because obese humans usually have elevated plasma leptin levels (52), and some form of central resistance to leptin has been postulated (53), this contrast raises the intriguing possibility that in obese humans there could be direct peripheral actions of elevated leptin on the liver (54, 55), leading to accelerated hepatic degradation of HDL apoproteins. Alternatively, there could be central effects of elevated leptin levels that influence HDL metabolic pathways.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank G. Hollopeter and R. D. Palmiter for plasma samples from npy-/- ob/ob mice, F. Rinninger for providing us with NMTC, J. L. Breslow for many helpful discussions, and I. Tabas for comments on the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant HL22682 (to A. R. T.) and National Institutes of Health Research Fellowship Award HL09928-01 (to D. L. S.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Div. of Molecular Medicine, Department of Medicine, 622 W. 168th St., Columbia University, New York, NY 10032. Tel.: 212-305-5789; Fax: 212-305-5052; E-mail: dls51{at}columbia.edu.

The abbreviations used are: HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein; apo, apolipoprotein; SR-BI, scavenger receptor B-I; wt, wild-type; PLTP, phospholipid transfer protein; NPY, neuropeptide Y; LPL, lipoprotein lipase; NMTC, N-methyltyramine cellobiose.

2 D. Silver and A. Tall, unpublished results.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
References

  1. Miller, N. (1980) in Atherosclerosis (Gotto, A. M., Jr., and Allen, B., eds), pp. 500-503, Springer Publishing Co., New York
  2. Breslow, J. (1994) Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 5, 175-184[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Berliner, J. A., Naveb, M., Fogelman, A. M., Frank, J. S., Demer, L. L., Edwards, P. A., Watson, A. D., and Lusis, A. J. (1995) Circulation 91, 2488-2496[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Brinton, E. A., Eisenberg, S., and Breslow, J. L. (1994) Arterioscler. Thromb. 14, 707-720[Abstract]
  5. Fidge, N., Nestel, P., Ishikawa, T., Reardon, M., and Billington, T. (1980) Metabolism 29, 643-653[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Tall, A. R., and Breslow, J. L. (1996) in Atherosclerosis and Coronary Artery Disease (Fuster, V., Ross, R., and Topol, E. J., eds), pp. 105-128, Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia
  7. Horowitz, B. S., Goldberg, I. J., Merab, J., Vanni, T. M., Ramakrishnan, R., and Ginsberg, H. N. (1993) J. Clin. Invest. 91, 1743-1752[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Glass, C., Pittman, R. C., Civen, M., and Steinberg, D. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 744-750[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Glass, C. K., Pittman, R. C., Keller, G. A., and Steinberg, D. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 7161-7167[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Acton, S., Rigotti, A., Landschulz, K. T., Xu, S., Hobbs, H. H., and Krieger, M. (1996) Science 271, 518-520[Abstract]
  11. Rigotti, A., Trigatti, B. L., Penman, M., Rayburn, H., Herz, J., and Krieger, M. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 12610-12615[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Varban, M. L., Rinninger, F., Wang, N., Fairchild-Huntress, V., Dunmore, J. H., Fang, Q., Gosselin, M. L., Dixon, K. L., Deeds, J. D., Acton, S. L., Tall, A. R., and Huszar, D. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 4619-4624[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Nishina, P. M., Lowe, S., Wang, J., and Paigen, B. (1994) Metabolism 43, 549-553[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Hamann, A., Flier, J. S., and Lowell, B. B. (1998) Z. Ernahr. Wiss. 37, 1-7
  15. Zhang, Y., Proenca, R., Maffei, M., Barone, M., Leopold, L., and Friedman, J. M. (1994) Nature 372, 425-432[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Lee, G.-H., Proenca, R., Montez, J. M., Carroll, K. M., Darvishzadeh, J. G., Lee, J. I., and Friedman, J. M. (1996) Nature 379, 632-635[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Le, N. A., Ramakrishnan, R., Dell, R. B., Ginsberg, H. N., and Brown, W. V. (1986) Methods Enzymol. 129, 384-395[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Wang, N., Weng, W., Breslow, J. L., and Tall, A. R. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 21001-21004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Jiang, X., Francone, O. L., Bruce, C., Milne, R., Mar, J., Walsh, A., Breslow, J. L., and Tall, A. R. (1996) J. Clin. Invest. 98, 2373-2380[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Cheng, C.-F., Bensadoun, A., Bersot, T., Hsu, J. S. T., and Melford, K. H. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 10720-10727[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Mehrabian, M., Qiao, J. H., Hyman, R., Ruddle, D., Laughton, C., and Lusis, A. J. (1993) Arterioscler. Thromb. 13, 1-10[Abstract]
  22. Pittman, R. C., Carew, T. E., Glass, C. K., Green, S. R., Taylor, C. A., Jr., and Attie, A. D. (1983) Biochem. J. 212, 791-800[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Joosten, H. F., and van der Kroon, P. H. (1974) Metabolism 23, 59-66[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Hildenbrandt, G. R., and Aronson, N. N., Jr. (1979) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 587, 373-380[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Ji, Z. S., Dichek, H. L., Miranda, R. D., and Mahley, R. W. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 31285-31292[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Pelleymounter, M. A., Cullen, M. J., Baker, M. B., Hecht, R., Winters, D., Boone, T., and Collins, F. (1995) Science 269, 540-543[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Halaas, J. L., Gajiwala, K. S., Maffei, M., Cohen, S. L., Chait, B. T., Rabinowitz, D., Lallone, R. L., Burley, S. K., and Friedman, J. M. (1995) Science 269, 543-546[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Campfield, L. A., Smith, F. J., Guisez, Y., Devos, R., and Burn, P. (1995) Science 269, 546-549[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Erickson, J. C., Hollopeter, G., and Palmiter, R. D. (1996) Science 274, 1704-1707[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Kamohara, S., Burcelin, R., Halaas, J. L., Friedman, J. M., and Charron, M. J. (1997) Nature 389, 374-377[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Le, N. A., and Ginsberg, H. N. (1988) Metabolism 37, 614-617[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Strickland, D. K., Ashcom, J. D., Williams, S., Burgess, W. H., Migliorini, M., and Argraves, W. S. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 17401-17404[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Willnow, T. E., Sheng, Z., Ishibashi, S., and Herz, J. (1994) Science 264, 1471-1474[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Rath, E. A. H. D., and Beloff-Chain, A. (1974) Diabetologia 10, 261-265[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Cooper, A. (1997) J. Lipid Res. 38, 2173-2192[Abstract]
  36. Liu, M. S., Jirik, F. R., LeBoeuf, R. C., Henderson, H., Castellani, L. W., Lusis, A. J., Ma, Y., Forsythe, I. J., Zhang, H., Kirk, E., Brunzell, J. D., and Hayden, M. R. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 11417-11424[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Sarmiento, U. B. B., Kaufman, S., Ross, L., Qi, M., Scully, S., and DiPalma, C. (1997) Lab. Invest. 77, 243-256[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Plump, A. S., Scott, C. J., and Breslow, J. L. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 9607-9611[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Liu, A. C., Lawn, R. M., Verstuyft, J. G., and Rubin, E. M. (1994) J. Lipid Res. 35, 2263-2267[Abstract]
  40. Walsh, A., Ito, Y., and Breslow, J. L. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 6488-6494[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Ladias, J. A. K. S. (1991) Science 251, 561-565[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Tzameli, I., and Zannis, V. I. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 8402-8415[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Taylor, A. H., Wishart, P., Lawless, D. E., Raymond, J., and Wong, N. C. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 8281-8288[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Zaiou, M., Azrolan, N., Hayek, T., Wang, H., Wu, L., Haghpassand, M., Cizman, B., Madaio, M. P., Milbrandt, J., Marsh, J. B., Breslow, J. L., and Fisher, E. A. (1998) J. Clin. Invest. 101, 1699-1707[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Mooradian, A. D., Wong, N. C., and Shah, G. N. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 271, R1602-R1607[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Azrolan, N., Odaka, H., Breslow, J. L., and Fisher, E. A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 19833-19838[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Muzzin, P., Eisensmith, R. C., Copeland, K. C., and Woo, S. L. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 14804-14808[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Huang, Q., Rivest, R., and Richard, D. (1998) Endocrinology 139, 1524-1532[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Ohki-Hamazaki, H., Watase, K., Yamamoto, K., Ogura, H., Yamano, M., Yamada, K., Maeno, H., Imaki, J., Kikuyama, S., Wada, E., and Wada, K. (1997) Nature 390, 165-169[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Huszar, D., Lynch, C. A., Fairchild-Huntress, V., Dunmore, J. H., Fang, Q., Berkemeier, L. R. G. W., Kesterson, R. A., Boston, B. A., Cone, R. D., Smith, F. J., Campfield, L. A. B. P., and Lee, F. (1997) Cell 88, 131-141[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  51. Tall, A. R. (1990) J. Clin. Invest. 86, 379-384[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  52. Maffei, M., Halaas, J., Ravussin, E., Pratley, R. E., Lee, G. H., Zhang, Y., Fei, H., Kim, S., Lallone, R. R. S., Kern, P. A., and Friedman, J. M. (1995) Nat. Med. 1, 1155-1161[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  53. Halaas, J. L., Boozer, C., Blair-West, J., Fidahusein, N., Denton, D. A., and Friedman, J. M. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 8878-8883[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Shimabukuro, M. K. K., Chen, G., Wang, M. Y., Trieu, F., Lee, Y., Newgard, C. B., and Unger, R. H. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 4637-4641[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Cohen, S. M., Werrmann, J. G., and Tota, M. R. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 7385-7390[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.