The Ligand-induced Structural Changes of Human L-Arginine:Glycine Amidinotransferase
A MUTATIONAL AND CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC STUDY*

Erich FritscheDagger , Andreas Humm, and Robert Huber

From the Department of Structural Research, Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry, Abteilung Strukturforschung, Am Klopferspitz 18a, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
References

Human L-arginine:glycine amidinotransferase (AT) shows large structural changes of the 300-flap and of helix H9 upon binding of L-arginine and L-ornithine, described as a closed and an open conformation (Humm, A., Fritsche, E., Steinbacher, S., and Huber, R. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 3373-3385). To elucidate the structural basis of these induced-fit movements, the x-ray structures of AT in complex with the amidino acceptor glycine and its analogs gamma -aminobutyric acid and delta -aminovaleric acid, as well as in complex with the amidino donor analogs L-alanine, L-alpha -aminobutyric acid, and L-norvaline, have been solved at 2.6-, 2.5-, 2.37-, 2.3-, 2.5-, and 2.4-Å resolutions, respectively. The latter three compounds were found to stabilize the open conformer. The glycine analogs bind in a distinct manner and do not induce the transition to the open state. The complex with glycine revealed a third binding mode, reflecting the rather broad substrate specificity of AT. These findings identified a role for the alpha -amino group of the ligand in stabilizing the open conformer. The kinetic, structural, and thermodynamic properties of the mutants ATDelta M302 and ATDelta 11 (lacks 11 residues of H9) confirmed the key role of Asn300 and suggest that in mammalian amidinotransferases, the role of helix H9 is in accelerating amidino transfer by an induced-fit mechanism. Helix H9 does not add to the stability of the protein.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
References

Creatine and its phosphorylated form provide a dynamic reservoir of high energy phosphate in several tissues, most prominently in skeletal muscle and heart (1). Most vertebrates are able to synthesize creatine de novo from L-arginine and glycine (2) by the successive action of L-arginine:glycine amidinotransferase (AT)1 (transamidinase, EC 2.1.4.1) and S-adenosylmethionine:guanidinoacetate N-methyltransferase (guanidinoacetate methyltransferase, EC 2.1.1.2) (1), whereas most invertebrates must obtain creatine from their diet. In higher vertebrates, creatine is synthesized primarily in the liver, pancreas, and kidney, transported by the bloodstream and taken up by Na+-dependent creatine transporters into muscle and neural tissues (3, 4), where the majority of the creatine/phosphocreatine pool is located (1).

The de novo biosynthesis of creatine is controlled at the level of AT (1), which catalyzes the rate-limiting step of creatine biosynthesis: the transfer of an amidino group from L-arginine to glycine, resulting in L-ornithine and guanidinoacetic acid, the immediate precursor of creatine. AT is regulated in a variety of ways, including product inhibition of its catalytic activity by ornithine (5), end product repression of its synthesis at a pretranslational level by creatine (6-10), induction by growth hormone and thyroxine (9, 11), and repression during embryogenic development (12-14). Deficiencies of L-ornithine:2-oxoacid aminotransferase (EC 2.6.1.13) result in hyperornithinemia (15), which is associated with type II muscle fiber atrophy and gyrate atrophy of the choroid and retina, a disease that progressively leads to blindness (16). Because ornithine is a strong competitive inhibitor of AT, its 10-20-fold increased plasma concentration in hyperornithinemia results in inhibition of AT, suggesting impaired de novo creatine biosynthesis as the cause of the aforementioned pathogenesis of the eye and muscle (16, 17).

AT exhibits a rather broad substrate specificity and can utilize a wide variety of amidino donors, such as L-canavanine, 4-guanidinobutyrate, 3-guanidinopropionate, and hydroxyguanidine, and amidino acceptors, such as L-canaline, 4-aminobutyrate, 3-aminopropionate, and hydroxylamine, in addition to the physiological substrates (1). Biochemical data suggested a ping-pong mechanism for the transamidination reaction (18, 19), including a transient covalent attachment of an amidino group to Cys407 (20-22). The crystal structure of human AT at high resolution revealed that the nucleophilic Cys407 is located at the bottom of an narrow active site channel (23). The enzyme adopts open and closed conformations during the reaction cycle. The crystal structures of AT in complex with L-arginine and L-ornithine showed that binding is accompanied by large conformational changes, with shifts of up to 5 Å for the 300-flap and for helix H9 compared with the unliganded enzyme (Fig. 1) (23). However, highly homologous amidinotransferases are also found in certain strains of Streptomyces sp., in which they catalyze two transamidination reactions in the biosynthesis of the streptomycin family of antibiotics (24-27). These amidinotransferases lack the flexible helix H9 in human AT as the most prominent difference, indicating distinctly different ligand and intermediate binding. The crystal structure of L-arginine:inosamine-phosphate amidinotransferase StrB1 from Streptomyces griseus (StrB1) was solved recently at 3.1 Å (28) and revealed a fold closely related to AT. However, major changes were found in loops surrounding the active site, resulting in an open and solvent exposed cavity. These differences can be largely attributed to the deletion of AT helix H9 and to the deletion of one residue in the AT 300-loop. The conformation of the 300-loop implies that StrB1, in contrast to AT, adopts a single conformation during catalysis.

The aim of the work described here was to establish a role for the induced-fit movements of AT and in particular for AT helix H9. In addition, the properties of a ligand molecule inducing the large conformational changes upon binding should be clarified. The crystal structures of AT in complex with the amidino acceptor analogs gamma -aminobutyric acid and delta -aminovaleric acid on the one hand, and the amidino donor analogs L-alanine, L-alpha -aminobutyric acid, and L-norvaline on the other hand (Fig. 2), revealed two distinct binding modes. A third binding mode was found for glycine, reflecting the rather broad substrate specificity of AT. The ability of these compounds to trigger the induced-fit movements was investigated and led to the identification of the required chemical groups. A multiple sequence alignment revealed that residue Met302 and helix H9 are deleted in the bacterial amidinotransferases. To investigate the role of helix H9 and of residue Met302, we prepared appropriate deletion mutants of human AT and examined their kinetic, thermodynamic, and structural properties. The implications of these results for the structure and the induced-fit mechanism of AT are discussed.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Protein Expression and Purification-- Wild-type AT, the AT deletion mutants ATDelta M302 and ATDelta 11, and StrB1 were overexpressed as N-terminal hexahistidine fusion proteins and purified by nitrilotriacetate-agarose affinity chromatography as described previously (20, 28). In order to obtain highly pure StrB1 for spectroscopic experiments, an additional purification step was essential. Briefly, the pooled fractions from the nitrilotriacetate-agarose affinity column were dialyzed against Buffer A (30 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1 M ammonium sulfate, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM GSH) and applied at a flow rate of 2 ml/min to a 24-ml column of phenyl-Sepharose 6 FF (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) equilibrated with Buffer A. After washing with Buffer A, the enzyme was eluted with a linear salt gradient (0.8-0 M) of ammonium sulfate in Buffer B (30 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM GSH). The fractions containing StrB1 were combined and dialyzed against 30 mM HEPES-NaOH, pH 7.7, 0.5 mM EDTA, and 0.5 mM GSH. Purity of the enzyme preparations were assessed by SDS-PAGE through 12% polyacrylamide gels (29) followed by staining with Coomassie Briliant Blue R-250. The identity of the isolated proteins was verified by N-terminal sequencing, mass spectrometry, and enzymatic activity. The deconvoluted mass spectra revealed major peaks for wild-type AT of 45,812 Da (electrospray ionization MS, calculated mass, 45,777 Da), for ATDelta M302 of 45,659 Da (electrospray ionization MS, calculated mass, 45,646 Da), for ATDelta 11 of 44,540 Da (matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization MS, calculated mass, 44,491 Da), and for StrB1 of 40,170 Da (electrospray ionization MS, calculated mass, 40,163 Da). The yields of electrophoretically homogeneous protein per liter of culture were 2-3 mg for AT and ATDelta M302 and 0.2-1 mg for ATDelta 11 and StrB1.

Mutagenesis-- For preparation of the mutant ATDelta M302 (lacks Met302) the QuikChangeTM mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, Heidelberg, Germany), the plasmid pRSETAT38H (20), and the primers 5'-GGTAGCATCAATATGGGGATTGGGATC-3' and 5'-GATCCCAATCCCCATATTGATGCTACC-3' were used. The deletion mutant ATDelta 11 (lacks amino acids Ile229-Ala239) was prepared using the ExSiteTM mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) with primers 5'P-GGGATAATCCTGGTTATAAAGC-3' and 5'P-GCTCAGGGAAAATTTGTGACAACTGAATTCGAGCCATGC-3' (both primers contained a 5'-phosphate group). The primers were purchased from MWG-Biotech (Ebersberg, Germany). The deletions were verified by DNA sequencing of the whole coding region in both directions.

Protein Determination and Activity Measurements-- The protein concentration was determined spectrophotometrically using a specific absorption coefficient at 280 nm of 2.0 cm2·mg-1 for AT and its variants, and 1.46 cm2·mg-1 for StrB1. The activity of AT and StrB1 was measured by the method of Van Pilsum et al. (30), by incubating the enzyme with 20 mM L-arginine and 20 mM of glycine or hydroxylamine, as amidino donor and acceptor, respectively, and determining the formed L-ornithine by a ninhydrin color reaction. One enzyme unit is defined as the amount of enzyme that releases 1 µmol of L-ornithine/h at 37 °C.

Crystallization-- The purified proteins were concentrated by ultrafiltration (Centricon-30, Amicon) to approximately 13 mg/ml. Crystals of AT and ATDelta M302 were grown by vapor diffusion using the hanging drop method. The droplets were made from 7 µl of a protein solution (13 mg/ml in 30 mM HEPES-NaOH, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM GSH) and 14 µl of a reservoir solution (3% (w/v) polyethylene glycol 6000, 40 mM HEPES-NaOH, pH 7.0) and equilibrated against the reservoir solution. Tetragonal-bipyramidal-shaped crystals of AT (approximately 0.7 × 0.4 × 0.4 mm) appeared after 2 days. Crystals from the mutant ATDelta M302 grew from precipitated protein within 5 days. ATDelta M302 crystallized isomorphously to the wild-type enzyme in the tetragonal space group P43212, with lattice constants of a = b = 83.71 Å, c = 200.41 Å, and a = b = c = 90° (Table I). The asymmetric unit contained one molecule with a solvent content of 68% (Vm = 3.83 Å3/Da) (31).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Data collection and refinement statistics

Soaking Experiments-- Crystals were transferred from the mother liquor to droplets of harvesting buffer (20% polyethylene glycol 6000, 267 mM HEPES-NaOH, pH 7.0) containing either glycine (0.5 M), gamma -aminobutyric acid (0.1 M), delta -aminovaleric acid (1.0 M), L-alanine (0.5 M), L-alpha -aminobutyric acid (0.5 M), or L-norvaline (saturated), and soaked for 15-50 h. The chemical structures of the soaked compounds are presented in Fig. 2.

Data Collection and Processing-- X-ray measurements were performed on a MAR Research imaging plate detector system at 18 °C mounted on a Rigaku RU200 rotating anode x-ray generator with lambda = CuKalpha  = 1.542 Å. Images were processed with MOSFLM (32) and data were scaled and reduced using ROTAVATA/AGROVATA/TRUNCATE (33). The statistics of data collection are given in Table I.

Refinement and Quality of the Final Model-- As the crystals of the AT deletion mutant ATDelta M302 and of all complexes were isomorphous with those of the wild-type protein, the wild-type structure was used as a model for initial Fourier (2Fo - Fc) and difference Fourier (Fo - Fc) maps. Subsequently, the substrates and inhibitors were fitted to the electron density using FRODO (34) on an ESV-30 Graphic system workstation (Evans & Sutherland, Salt Lake City, UT), and the model was refined with XPLOR (35) using the parameter set of Engh and Huber (36). The final model comprises residues 64-423. The region from residue 230 to residue 242 displays average main chain B values, which are about 10 Å2 (AT in closed conformation) and 45 Å2 (AT in open conformation) above the B value for the whole protein and correlate with poor electron density. Water molecules were built into 1 sigma  peaks of the (2Fo - Fc) map. Water molecules with B factors above 50 Å2 were removed from the model prior to the last refinement. The models show good geometry with R-factors below 20% and root mean square deviations for a bond length of 0.010-0.011 Å and for bond angles of 1.56-1.62°. Two of the three Ramachandran outliers (37) (Met184 and His303) are well defined and are also observed in the wild-type AT structure (23), whereas Ser231 is poorly defined and is observed as outlier solely in the structures adopting an "open" state. The final refinement statistics and stereochemical parameters are presented in Table I.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Sedimentation analysis of ATDelta M302, ATDelta 11, and StrB1
Given the dimeric quaternary structure, the calculated molecular masses for AT, ATDelta M302, ATDelta 11, and StrB1 are 91.8, 91.6, 89.2, and 80.3 kDa, respectively. ND, not determined.

Circular Dichroism Measurements-- Far-UV circular dichroism spectra were recorded on a Mark-IV (Jobin Yvon) spectropolarimeter. The spectra were recorded from 195 to 250 nm in a thermostated 0.01-cm quartz cuvette at 10 °C. A protein concentration of about 0.15 mg/ml in phosphate-buffered saline (39), pH 7.4, 0.5 mM EDTA, and 1 mM GSH was used. All spectra were accumulated four times and corrected for the buffers. Mean molar residue ellipticities (theta R) were calculated based on a mean residue molecular weight of 113. The thermal unfolding curves were determined by monitoring the changes in dichroic intensity at 216 nm as a function of temperature. The measurements were carried out in the temperature range of 10-80 °C with a temperature gradient of 0.5 °C/min using an oil-thermostatted cylindrical 0.01-cm quartz cell connected to a thermoprogrammer. The Tm values were derived by fitting the temperature-induced unfolding curves using the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation,
  &Dgr;G(T)=&Dgr;H<SUB>m</SUB>·(1−T/T<SUB>m</SUB>)−&Dgr;C<SUB>p</SUB>·(T<SUB>m</SUB>−T+T·ln(T/T<SUB>m</SUB>)) (Eq. 1)
where Delta G is the free energy of unfolding, Tm is the temperature at which 50% of the protein molecules are unfolded, Delta Hm is the enthalpy of unfolding at Tm, and Delta Cp is the heat capacity. A Delta Cp value of 2.7 kcal·mol-1K-1 was estimated from the amino acid composition (38). Because the thermal transitions of all studied proteins were irreversible, a quantitative evaluation of thermodynamic parameters was not possible.

Size Exclusion Chromatography-- Size exclusion chromatography was performed using a Superose 6 PC 3.2/30 column mounted on a SMARTTM system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). For all measurements a flow rate of 40 µl/min and phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol as buffer was used. The following marker proteins were used for calibration: bovine serum albumin (66 kDa), ovalbumine (45 kDa), carbonic anhydrase (29 kDa), and ribonuclease A (13.7 kDa).

Analytical Ultracentrifugation-- Sedimentation velocity and sedimentation equilibrium experiments were performed in a Beckman Spinco Model E analytical ultracentrifuge equipped with a photoelectric scanner. Double-sector cells with sapphire windows were used in an An-G rotor. Initial protein concentrations were about 0.2 mg/ml (ATDelta M302 and ATDelta 11) and 0.27 mg/ml (StrB1), corresponding to an initial absorbance at 280 nm of 0.4. Prior to the experiments, the protein samples were equilibrated against phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol. Sedimentation coefficients were determined at 20 °C and 44,000 rpm, plotting lnr versus time. The scanning wavelength was 280 nm. The partial specific volume was calculated using the partial specific volumes of the component amino acids, yielding a value of 0.735 ml/g. The solvent density was estimated to be 1.000 g/ml. High-speed sedimentation equilibria measurements (40) were performed at 22 °C and 16,000 rpm. The molecular weight was calculated from lnc versus r2 plots using a computer program written by G. Böhm (University of Regensburg). The scanning wavelengths were 230 and 280 nm.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Crystal Structures of AT in Open Conformation-- The crystal structures of AT and of its complexes with L-arginine and L-ornithine have been described (23), and they show that AT exists in at least two different conformations: (i) a closed conformation of ligand-free AT, and (ii) an open conformation induced by the binding of L-arginine (to AT mutant C407S) and L-ornithine (Fig. 1). In order to evaluate the molecular basis of these ligand-induced conformational changes, the structures of the binary complexes of AT with the amidino donor analogs L-norvaline, L-alpha -aminobutyric acid, and L-alanine (Fig. 2) were solved at resolutions of 2.4, 2.5, and 2.3 Å, respectively. These amino acids differ in the number of side chain carbon atoms, and they are not substrates because they lack the terminal amino group. In the presence of substrate concentrations of 10 mM, only L-norvaline was found to inhibit amidine transfer (41, 42). The x-ray structures of L-norvaline, L-alpha -aminobutyric acid, and L-alanine provide a clue for the inhibition mechanism at atomic resolution. All these ligands induce the transition from the closed to the open state and bind similar to the L-ornithine and L-arginine co-crystal structures (Fig. 1). The carboxylate and alpha -amino groups of these compounds would clash with the side chain of Asn300 in the closed conformer. This leads to a displacement of the 300-flap (residues Asp298-Pro299-Asn300-Pro301) toward helix H9 (residues Val232-Gln241). A concomitant repositioning of helix H9 prevents steric collision of Pro299 with His236 and of Asn300 with Arg235. The shifts are as large as 5.1 Å for the Calpha position of Pro299 and about 3.3 Å for the Calpha positions of helix H9 (Fig. 1). These motions open the active site and may facilitate ligand binding and dissociation of reaction products. In agreement with the canonical binding, the carboxylate oxygen OT1 of L-norvaline accepts a hydrogen bond from Ser355 Ogamma (2.8 Å) and is fixed via a bifurcated hydrogen bond to Neta 1 and Neta 2 (both 2.9 Å) of Arg322 (Fig. 3A). The amide nitrogen of Ser355 donates a hydrogen bond to the OT2 carboxylate oxygen (2.8 Å). The alpha -amino group is a hydrogen bond donor to the carbonyl oxygen of Met302 (2.8 Å). In contrast to the substrate binding residues, the 300-flap was not unambigously defined in the L-alanine complex, indicating a partial occupation of two (open and closed) positions. This could be attributed to a decreased binding affinity of L-alanine due to its small side chain. In accordance, L-norvaline is the best of these amino acid inhibitors and is identical to L-ornithine in the length of the carbon side chain. In contrast to L-alanine, L-ornithine is a strong competitive inhibitor (Ki, 0.253 mM), and the plasma L-ornithine levels in hyperornithinemia may be sufficient to inhibit AT, resulting in gyrate atrophy of the choroid and retina (17).


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   The ligand-induced structural changes of AT. A, superimposition of helix H9 and of the 300-loop in open conformation (blue) and "closed" AT (yellow). Binding of an L-ornithine molecule (green) would sterically interfere with the side chain of Asn300 in the closed conformation and induces the displacement of the 300-loop in a concerted fashion with H9. B, comparison of the 300-loop and helix H9 of AT in the open (blue) and closed (yellow) conformations. The orientation is the same as in A. The open conformation is stabilized by hydrogen bonds from Pro299 O and Asn300 Odelta 1 to the guanidino group of Arg235 (dashed lines). The coordinates were taken from Ref. 23, and the figure was produced with SETOR (46).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Chemical formulas of compounds mentioned in the text. The physiological substrates and products of L-arginine:glycine amidinotransferase are shown. The various analogs mentioned in the text are arranged in a group of amidino donor analogs (which contain an alpha -amino group) and a group of amidino acceptor analogs (which do not contain an alpha -amino group).


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   The binding modes of L-norvaline (A), delta -aminovaleric acid (B), and glycine (C) and the active site topology of the mutant ATDelta M302 (D). A, the binding mode of L-norvaline. AT is found in the open conformation. The residue Asn300 is displaced upon binding of L-norvaline (see Fig. 1B). B, the delta -aminovaleric acid binding site. AT is found in the closed conformation. Asn300 hydrogen bonds to the ligated delta -aminovaleric acid molecule. C, the glycine binding site. Only the hydrogen bonds to Ser354, Wat111, and His303 are within hydrogen bond distances; the other interactions indicated are in the range of 3.9 Å. For A-C, the Fo - Fc difference electron density maps contoured at the 1 sigma  level are shown in red and superimposed on the refined models. D, active site topology of mutant ATDelta M302. The final 2Fo - Fc electron density map contoured at 1 sigma  (green) is superimposed on the refined model. For comparison, the corresponding residues of closed AT are represented as black sticks. A modeled L-norvaline inhibitor molecule is shown in cyan. The deletion of residue Met302 results in a new side chain conformation of Asn300, which allows binding without obvious steric restrictions. The figure was produced with SETOR (46).

Crystal Structures of AT in Closed Conformation-- The crystal structures of unligated AT, as well as of AT in complex with the amidino acceptor or analogs glycine, gamma -aminobutyric acid, and delta -aminovaleric acid (Fig. 2), were found in closed conformation. gamma -Aminobutyric acid and delta -aminovaleric acid bind differently to L-norvaline, L-alpha -aminobutyric acid, and L-alanine. The carboxylate group of the ligand is shifted 1.2 Å away from Asn300, which allows binding without inducing conformational changes (Fig. 3B). The carboxylate oxygen OT1 of delta -aminovaleric acid is a hydrogen bond acceptor to Neta 1 of Arg322 (3.2 Å). OT2 shares a hydrogen bond to Ser355 Ogamma (2.5 Å), to the amide nitrogen of Ser355 (2.9 Å), and to Ndelta 2 of Asn300 (2.9 Å). A buried water molecule bridges OT1 (2.8 Å) to the side chain of Thr307 (2.8 Å), and to Ala306 N (2.9 Å) and His303 O (2.7 Å), respectively. The delta -amino group of delta -aminovaleric acid is surrounded by Asp305, Cys407, His303, and Asp170. A comparison of the structures in complex with gamma -aminobutyric acid and delta -aminovaleric acid with L-norvaline, L-alpha -aminobutyric acid, and L-alanine revealed that the alpha -amino group and not the number of carbon atoms is the principal determinant for the movement of the 300-flap in concert with helix H9.

For glycine, a completely different binding mode was observed. Its carboxylate group is not involved in ion pair formation with Arg322 but makes a bifurcated hydrogen bond to His303 Ndelta 1 (3.4 Å) and to a water molecule (3.0 Å), which hydrogen bonds to Tyr164 OH (3.1 Å) (Fig. 3C). The amino group donates a hydrogen bond to Ser354 Ogamma (3.3 Å) and is 4.6 Å apart from the nucleophilic cysteine 407. A simultaneous binding of L-arginine and glycine is not possible, in accordance with a double-displacement (ping-pong) mechanism.

Structure of ATDelta M302-- A comparison of the amino acid sequences of AT and StrB1 revealed a one residue deletion at position 302. The corresponding deletion Delta M302 was introduced into the AT gene by site-directed mutagenesis, and the variant was recombinantly expressed and crystallized. This variant differs from the wild-type structure only at the site of the Met302 deletion, which results in a new path for residues (Asn300-Pro301-Met302), whereas the flanking residues Pro299 and His303 are at topologically identical positions to the wild-type structure. Most remarkably, the side chain of Asn300 takes an alternative position, which would not interfere with L-ornithine binding, and in fact could contribute a hydrogen bond to the alpha -amino group (Fig. 3D). The carbonyl oxygen of Pro301 of ATDelta M302 could substitutes for the carbonyl oxygen of the deleted residue Met302, accepting a hydrogen bond from the alpha -amino group. These findings suggest that ATDelta M302 does not switch between an open and closed state but is permanently locked in the closed conformation.

Evidence for Structural Integrity of ATDelta M302 and ATDelta 11-- The structural integrity of the mutants ATDelta M302 and ATDelta 11 was demonstrated by x-ray crystallography (for ATDelta M302), analytical ultracentrifugation experiments, and circular dichroism spectroscopy. The far-UV circular dichroism spectra of these mutants are very similar. Sedimentation coefficients and molecular masses of ATDelta M302 and ATDelta 11, determined by analytical ultracentrifugation, were found to be in good agreement with results for human kidney L-arginine:glycine amidinotransferase (Table II) (43). The sedimentation analysis shows that AT and its mutants ATDelta M302 and ATDelta 11, as well as StrB1, form homodimers and that the mutations did not affect dimerization. However, gel filtration experiments for wild-type AT, ATDelta M302, ATDelta 11, and StrB1 yielded apparent molecular masses between 52 and 56 kDa for all proteins, probably as a result of adsorption effects on the size-exclusion column.

Kinetic Properties of ATDelta M302 and ATDelta 11-- A kinetic analysis of the deletion mutant ATDelta 302 revealed an activity of about 0.15 units/mg, corresponding to a 100-fold decrease as compared with the wild-type enzyme (specific activity of about 15 units/mg). Both AT and ATDelta M302 displayed a background arginase activity of about 0.1 units/mg as reported previously (44), resulting from the hydrolysis of the covalent enzyme amidine intermediate. As mentioned above, the new side chain conformation of the key residue Asn300 may allow binding of substrates without inducing conformational changes. It is suggested that the main reason for the low enzymatic activity of this mutant is the lack of ligand-induced conformational changes, which somehow reduces the binding forces for products to accelerate amidine transfer. This view is in agreement with the comparable low enzymatic activity of 0.6 units/mg of StrB1, which naturally lacks helix H9 and possesses a one-residue deletion in the 300-flap.

In order to investigate the role of helix H9, a mutant lacking 11 residues from Ile229 to Ala239 was prepared by site-directed mutagenesis. Remarkably, the resultant deletion mutant ATDelta 11 showed a residual activity of 1.0 units/mg. This corresponds to a 15-fold reduced activity and lies in the range of StrB1, which naturally lacks helix H9. Obviously, the conformational flexibility of helix H9 is important for efficient catalysis and may stabilize the open conformation of the 300-flap. Indeed, the residue Arg235 of H9 donates two hydrogen bonds to Pro299 O and one to Asn300 Odelta 1, thereby fastening H9 to the 300-flap (Fig. 1B).

Additional evidence that the ligand-induced conformational changes increase the catalytic activity stems from activity measurements of AT, ATDelta M302, and ATDelta 11 in the presence of L-arginine and delta -aminovaleric acid as amidino donor and acceptor, respectively. The activity of the wild-type enzyme was found to be reduced about 5-fold, reflecting weaker binding of delta -aminovaleric acid and/or impaired dissociation. In contrast, no reduction of enzymatic activity was observed for ATDelta M302 and ATDelta 11. A likely explanation is that the dissociation of L-ornithine from these closed variants is hampered and limits the overall velocity.

Stability Measurements-- In order to evaluate a possible role of helix H9 in protein stability, temperature-induced transition curves were measured for ATDelta 11 and compared with AT and ATDelta M302. The thermal transitions were irreversible and did not allow determination of thermodynamic data. AT and ATDelta M302 show similar midpoints of transition at Tm = 51.9 and 51.2 °C, respectively. For ATDelta 11, the Tm value (53.1 °C), as well as the cooperativity of the transition, is slightly increased (Fig. 4). These results suggest that neither residue Met302 nor helix H9 adds to the stability in vertebrate AT.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Thermal unfolding curves for AT (bullet ), ATDelta M302 (open circle ), and ATDelta 11 (×). The change in dichroic intensity at 216 nm as a function of temperature was monitored. The heating rate was 0.5 °C/min. Measurements were done using 0.15 mg/ml of protein in phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol. See under "Experimental Procedures" for details.

Implications for the Induced-fit Mechanism-- The crystal structures of AT in complex with L-alanine, L-alpha -aminobutyric acid, L-norvaline, glycine, gamma -aminobutyric acid, and delta -aminovaleric acid showed three different binding modes that lead to an understanding of the broad substrate specificity. It is known from L-arginine analogs that only L-arginine (chain number of carbon atoms (n) = 5) and L-canavanine (the guanidinoxy analog of arginine) can serve as amidino donor. Longer and shorter arginine analogs, such as homoarginine (n = 6), alpha -amino-gamma -guanidinobutyric acid (n = 4), and alpha -amino-beta -guanidinopropionic acid (n = 3) are not substrates for AT (1). These amino acid derivatives are supposed to bind to AT via their alpha -amino and carboxylate groups, but only compounds with the appropriate chain length reach the nucleophilic cysteine and are able to transfer their amidino groups. The same holds true for L-norvaline and related inhibitors, such as L-alpha -aminobutyric acid, and L-alanine, which bind in a similar manner but lack the terminal guanidino/amino group. In contrast, the chain length is not important for glycine analogs functioning as amidino acceptors as long as they are shorter than n = 6. Glycine (n = 2), beta -aminopropionic acid (n = 3), gamma -aminobutyric acid (n = 4), and delta -aminovaleric acid are substrates for AT, albeit inferior to glycine (1). We showed that the amidino acceptor analogs gamma -aminobutyric acid (n = 4) and delta -aminovaleric acid (n = 5) bind differently to amino acid derivatives and do not induce the displacement of the 300-loop and of helix H9. Acceptors with fewer than n = 4 carbon atoms are proposed to use different binding modes. This was observed for glycine, which binds in a completely distinct manner, closer to the nucleophilic cysteine 407. It was noted before (45) that arginine reacts with both AT and StrB1, whereas glycine is not a substrate for StrB1. A comparison of the two active sites revealed that residues interacting with L-arginine are all conserved but that most residues involved in glycine binding are not conserved. The residues Tyr164, Ser354, and Asn300 are topologically replaced by residues His102, Ala224, and Cys279 in StrB1, disrupting the hydrogen bond network observed for AT (Fig. 3C). Clearly, in AT, the active site is optimized to accommodate glycine. Its function in creatine biosynthesis is assisted by the flexible 300-loop and helix H9, resulting in a much more restricted active site. The kinetic and crystallographic analysis of AT and of its deletion mutants suggested that these key differences have led to (i) a strong increase of the catalytic turnover, which is required for creatine biosynthesis, (ii) a slightly diminished arginase side reactivity, and (iii) an increased substrate specificity. Stability measurements showed that H9 may increase the pH stability but has no function in temperature stability.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Prof. R. Jaenicke (University of Regensburg, Germany) for performing the analytical ultracentrifugation experiments and Lissy Weher for advice on spectroscopic measurements.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 49-898578-2660; Fax: 49-898578-3516; E-mail: fritsche{at}biochem.mpg.de.

The abbreviations used are: AT, recombinant human mitochondrial L-arginine:glycine amidinotransferase; MS, mass spectrometry; GSH, glutathione; StrB1, L-arginine:inosamine-phosphate amidinotransferase StrB1 from S. griseus.
    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
References

  1. Walker, J. B. (1979) Adv. Enzymol. 50, 172-242
  2. Van Pilsum, J. F., Stephens, G. C., and Taylor, D. (1972) Biochem. J. 126, 325-345
  3. Loike, J. D., Zalutsky, D. L., Kaback, E., Miranda, A. F., and Silverstein, S. C. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 807-811[Abstract]
  4. Guimbal, C., and Kiliman, M. W. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 8418-8421[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Sipilä, I., Simell, O., and Arjomaa, P. (1980) J. Clin. Invest. 66, 684-687[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Walker, J. B. (1960) J. Biol. Chem. 235, 2357-2361[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Walker, J. B. (1961) J. Biol. Chem. 236, 493-498[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. McGuire, D. M., Gross, M. D., Van Pilsum, J. F., and Towle, H. C. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 12034-12038[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Guthmiller, P., Van Pilsum, J. F., Boen, J. R., and McGuire, D. M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 17556-17560[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Walker, J. B., and Hannan, J. K. (1976) Biochemistry 15, 2519-2522[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. McGuire, D. M., Tormanen, C. D., Segal, I. S., and Van Pilsum, J. F. (1980) J. Biol. Chem. 255, 1152-1159[Free Full Text]
  12. Walker, M. S., and Walker, J. B. (1962) J. Biol. Chem. 237, 473-476[Free Full Text]
  13. Tormanen, C. D., and Sutter, B. E. (1985) Biosci. Rep. 5, 309-314[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Van Pilsum, J. F., and Ungar, F. (1968) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 124, 372-379[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Shih, V. E., Berson, E. L., Mandell, R., and Schmidt, S. Y. (1978) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 30, 174-179[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Sipilä, I., Simell, O., Rapola, J., Sainio, K., and Tuuteri, L. (1979) Neurology 29, 996-1005[Abstract]
  17. Sipilä, I. (1980) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 613, 79-84[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Ronca, G., Vigi, V., and Grazi, E. (1966) J. Biol. Chem. 241, 2589-2595[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Fritsche, E., Humm, A., and Huber, R. (1997) Eur. J. Biochem. 247, 483-490[Abstract]
  20. Humm, A., Fritsche, E., Mann, K., Göhl, M., and Huber, R. (1997) Biochem. J. 322, 771-776[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Grazi, E., Conconi, F., and Vigi, V. (1964) J. Biol. Chem. 240, 2465-2467
  22. Grazi, E., and Rossi, N. (1968) J. Biol. Chem. 243, 538-542[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Humm, A., Fritsche, E., Steinbacher, S., and Huber, R. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 3373-3385[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Walker, J. (1973) in The Enzymes (Boyer, P. D., ed), 3rd Ed., pp. 497-509, Academic Press, New York
  25. Walker, J. B. (1975) Methods Enzymol. 43, 451-458[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Ohnuki, T., Imanaka, T., and Aiba, S. (1985) J. Bacteriol. 164, 85-94[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Piepersberg, W. (1997) in Bio/Technology of Antibiotics (Strohl, W. R., ed), pp. 81-163, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York
  28. Fritsche, E., Bergner, A., Humm, A., Piepersberg, W., and Huber, R. (1999) Biochemistry, in press
  29. Schägger, H., and von Jagow, G. (1987) Anal. Biochem. 166, 368-379[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Van Pilsum, J. F., Taylor, D., Zakis, B., and McCormick, P. (1970) Anal. Biochem. 35, 277-286[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Matthews, B. W. (1968) J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491-497[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Leslie, A. G. W. (1994) Mosflm user guide, Mosflm Version 5.30, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  33. Collaborative Computational Project. (1994) Acta Crystallogr. D50, 760-763
  34. Jones, T. A. (1978) J. Appl. Crystallogr. 11, 268-272[CrossRef]
  35. Brünger, A. T. (1992) X-PLOR, Version 3.1, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
  36. Engh, R. A., and Huber, R. (1991) Acta Crystallogr. A47, 392-400[CrossRef]
  37. Laskowski, R. A., MacArthur, M. W., Moss, D. S., and Thornton, J. M. (1992) PROCHECK, Version 3.3, Oxford Molecular Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom
  38. Makhadzde, G. L., and Privalov, P. L. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 213, 375-384[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  40. Yphantis, D. A. (1964) Biochemistry 3, 297-317
  41. Ratner, S., and Rochovansky, O. (1956) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 63, 296-315
  42. Takeda, M., Kiyatake, I., Koide, H., Jung, K. Y., and Endou, H. (1992) Eur. J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem. 30, 325-331[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Gross, M. D., Eggen, M. A., Simon, A. M., and van Pilsum, J. F. (1986) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 251, 747-755[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Conconi, F., and Grazi, E. (1964) J. Biol. Chem. 240, 2461-2464
  45. Walker, J. B. (1958) J. Biol. Chem. 231, 1-9[Free Full Text]
  46. Evans, S. V. (1993) J. Mol. Graphics 11, 134-138[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.