From the Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In the purple non-sulfur bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus, RegA and RegB comprise a two-component regulatory system that is required for maximal anaerobic transcription of key photosynthesis genes. RegB is a sensor kinase that uses ATP to phosphorylate its cognate response regulator, RegA. The mechanism under which RegA~P influences transcription of target genes has been unclear given that past attempts to demonstrate DNA binding activity by isolated RegA have failed. This led to a model invoking a role for RegA~P as an intermediate in a more complex multicomponent phosphoryl transfer cascade. In the present study, we describe the isolation of a mutant version of RegA (RegA*) which promotes high level expression of photosynthesis genes independent of RegB. DNase I footprint analyses show that purified RegA* binds to the promoters of the puf and puc operons at locations that are consistent with RegA functioning as a transcriptional activator for these operons. We conclude that RegA functions, like most members of the response regulator family, as a DNA-binding protein that directly affects the expression of its target genes.
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Oxygen tension is an important environmental factor in regulating synthesis of the Rhodobacter capsulatus photosystem (1). In the presence of oxygen, the cell suppresses synthesis of a photosystem and instead obtains cellular energy through respiration. In contrast, when oxygen tension is reduced to <1%, the cell synthesizes intracytoplasmic membranes that contain the photosystem used to convert light into chemical energy. The photosystem is a highly organized structure composed of complexes designated as light harvesting-I (LH-I),1 light harvesting-II (LH-II), and the reaction center. Each light harvesting complex is formed by the assembly of protein-photopigment subunits into intricate ring structures where bacteriochlorophyll molecules are oriented precisely to absorb and channel light energy to the reaction center.
Expression of the structural proteins for LH-I, LH-II, and the reaction center complexes, encoded by the puf, puc, and puh operons, is regulated coordinately with respect to oxygen (for review, see Refs. 2 and 3). At the onset of anaerobiosis, the transition to photosynthetic growth is accompanied by a very large induction of puf, puh, and puc transcription which is derived primarily from promoters specific to these operons. Anaerobic activation of these promoters is dependent on a two-component regulatory system comprised of the sensor kinase, RegB, and the response regulator, RegA (4, 5). Genetic evidence that RegA and RegB constitute a cognate two-component system includes the observation that knockout mutations in regA and/or regB abolish anaerobic induction of the puf, puh, and puc operons (4, 5). The in vivo evidence is supported by in vitro analyses that demonstrated that a truncated form of the RegB polypeptide autophosphorylates in the presence of ATP and transfers the phosphate moiety to RegA (6).
Questions that remain to be addressed are the mechanism whereby RegB senses alterations in the redox state of the cell and whether RegA activates transcription of photosynthesis genes directly. Early attempts by our laboratory failed to demonstrate DNA binding activity by RegA in vitro. However, because many response regulators exhibit poor binding affinities for DNA (7-10), these experiments were inconclusive. One strategy that has been very helpful in the characterization of response regulators has been the isolation and purification of constitutively active variants. Some constitutively active response regulators are known to exhibit much higher affinity for their DNA binding sites without the need for phosphorylation (11-14). For example, VirGN54D, a constitutive mutant of VirG, binds to its target site approximately 10-fold more tightly than wild type VirG (13).
Given the difficulties of demonstrating DNA binding activity with wild type RegA, we decided to search for a variant that would be more amenable to the characterization of in vitro DNA binding activity. This paper describes the successful isolation of a RegA mutant that activates transcription of photosynthesis genes in the absence of RegB. DNase I footprint experiments were used to provide the first direct evidence that RegA is indeed a DNA binding response regulator that interacts with clearly defined sites within the puf and puc promoters.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Bacterial Strains, Media, and Growth Conditions--
R.
capsulatus strains were routinely grown at 34 °C in PYS or
RCV2/3PY as described previously (15). Spectinomycin and kanamycin were
used at 10 µg/ml for the maintenance of plasmids and the construction
of stable recombinants in R. capsulatus. A rifampicin concentration of 100 µg/ml was used for counterselection of
transconjugates. RCV-lactose medium was the same as regular RCV medium
(15) except that 0.2% lactose was used as the carbon source instead of
malate. Escherichia coli strains DH5 (Novagen), BL21(DE3)
(16), and S17-1 (
pir) (17) were grown at 37 °C in LB that
contained ampicillin and kanamycin at 100 or 50 µg/ml,
respectively.
Disruption of the Chromosomal Copy of regB --
To create a
regB mutant strain, two fragments were amplified from a
genomic DNA preparation by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). One
fragment encoded the NH2 terminus of RegB, and the other
encoded the carboxyl portion excluding the conserved histidine residue (5). The fragments were then ligated to either end of a kanamycin resistance cassette isolated from pBSL86 (18), and the resulting construct was cloned into pUC19 (19). Disruption of regB in strain SB1003/pCB532 (20) was performed by gene transfer
agent-mediated recombination of the plasmid-borne
regB::Km construct into the chromosome (21). Cells
with the desired chromosomal insertion were selected by kanamycin
resistance and then verified by PCR analysis. The
regB-disrupted strain was designated SD01.
Isolation of Constitutively Active RegA Bypass Mutants
(RegA*)--
RegA mutants whose activities are independent of RegB
were isolated by screening for mutants derived from SD01/pCB532
which could grow aerobically on minimal lactose medium plates (22) (see
"Results"). A culture of SD01/pCB532
was grown until late log
phase before the cells were harvested and mutagenized by ethyl methanesulfonate for 30 min (23). The treated cells were then diluted
serially and spread onto RCV-lactose plates. The plates were incubated
aerobically at 34 °C until colonies appeared. Colonies with dark red
color were restreaked several times onto RCV-lactose plates to isolate
pure strains.
Spectral and Protein Analysis--
Absorption spectra
obtained from crude membrane preparations and the procedure used to
measure -galactosidase activity in R. capsulatus have
been described previously (15).
Construction of a RegA* Overexpression Vector-- We combined features of the T7 RNA polymerase-based pET overexpression system (Novagen) and the IMPACTTM I purification system (New England Biolabs) to overexpress and purify RegA*. A new vector pET29CBD was first constructed by isolating a 224-base pair fragment encoding a chitin binding domain from the vector pCYB1 (New England Biolabs) with a BamHI and HindIII digest. The fragment was subcloned into the same sites of pET29a(+) (Novagen) to create pET29CBD. Next, the RegA* coding region was amplified by PCR using the primers 5'-CCATATGGCCGAAGAAGAATTCGCC and 5'-CCGCTCTTCCGCATCCCGGGCTGCGTTTGGCCAAA. These primers were designed to introduce an NdeI site at the start codon and a SapI site at the stop codon for RegA* (underlined bases). The PCR product was subsequently cloned into NdeI-SapI restriction sites of pCYB1 resulting in pCYB1::regA*. The NdeI-BamHI fragment of pCYB1::regA* was then subcloned into pET29CBD to produce pET29CBD::regA*. This construct contains the full-length regA* gene translationally linked to the intein/chitin binding domain (CBD) under the control of the T7 promoter.
Overexpression and Purification of RegA*--
The plasmid
pET29CBD::regA* was transformed into the pT7
RNA polymerase overexpression strain BL21(DE3) (16). RegA*
overexpression was induced by the addition of
isopropyl--D-thiogalactopyranoside to growing cultures
as described previously (6, 16). After 3 h of induction, cells
from 5 liters of culture were harvested by centrifugation at 7,600 × g at 4 °C for 10 min and then washed with 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) containing 2 mM EDTA. The
cell pellet was resuspended in 20 ml of ice-cold column buffer 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 500 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1% Triton X-100, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. The cell suspension was lysed by three
passages through a chilled French pressure cell at 18,000 p.s.i., and
the crude cell extract was then clarified by centrifugation at
12,000 × g for 30 min after which the supernatant was
filtered through a 0.45-µm Acrodisc (Gelman Sciences). RegA* was then
purified with a chitin affinity column at 4 °C using a protocol
described by the manufacturer (New England Biolabs). Elution fractions
determined to contain protein by a Bradford assay (Bio-Rad) were pooled
and concentrated further by fast pressure liquid chromatography
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) using a HitrapTMSP cation
exchange column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) at 4 °C. Protein was
eluted at a rate of 1 ml/min with a 0-1 M NaCl linear gradient with the gradient formula: 0-10 ml = 100% buffer B with buffer A composed of 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.8) and buffer B of
50 mM HEPES (pH 7.8), 1 M NaCl. Concentrated
RegA* typically eluted at 850 mM NaCl. The protein was then
dialyzed overnight at 4 °C against 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.8),
200 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.05 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, and 50% glycerol and then stored at
80 °C.
DNase I Footprint Analysis-- DNA probes that contained the puf (260 base pairs) or puc (180 base pairs) promoter regions were obtained by PCR and were P labeled as described previously (25, 26). Footprint assays were initiated by mixing binding reactions that contained 9.0 pmol of probe with various amounts of RegA* in buffer containing 40 mM HEPES (pH 7.8), 8 mM MgCl2, 75 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 1.5 mM dithiothreitol, 125 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, and 16% glycerol in a total volume of 20 µl. DNase I digests of the binding reactions and the generation of DNA sequence ladders by the Maxam and Gilbert chemical cleavage method were carried out as described previously (27).
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Isolation of Constitutively Active RegA Mutants--
Normally,
R. capsulatus is incapable of metabolizing lactose because
it lacks lacZY homologs that encode the -galactosidase and the lactose-specific permease. However, growth on minimal medium
with lactose as a carbon source can support growth if the lacZY genes from E. coli are expressed
heterologously (22). This property was exploited to select for
constitutively active RegA mutants (RegA*) either as spontaneous
mutants or from an ethyl methanesulfonate-treated culture of
SD01/pCB532
. This strain contains a disrupted regB gene
(see "Materials and Methods") that reduces expression of the
puf::lacZY translational fusion in pCB532
(20)
to a point that is too low to permit growth on lactose. Mutant strains
with elevated photosynthesis gene expression can thus be isolated by
selecting for growth on lactose. Such mutants would be expected to
bypass a requirement for activation by RegB and consequently produce
colonies under aerobic growth conditions which are more highly
pigmented than the parental strain.
|
Phenotype of RegA*-- Spectral analysis of photosynthetically grown anaerobic cultures demonstrated that SD97* cells had essentially the same amounts of photopigments as the wild type strain SB1003 (Fig. 2A). This is much higher than observed in SD01 (the parent of SD97*), which synthesizes low amounts of photopigments as a consequence of the chromosomal disruption of regB. Spectral analysis of cells grown under aerobic conditions demonstrated that, as expected, both wild type and SD01 cells synthesize low levels of photopigments (Fig. 2B). In contrast, aerobically grown SD97* cells synthesize significant elevated amounts of photopigments.
|
|
Overexpression and Purification of RegA*-- Previous in vitro studies with wild type RegA relied on protein purified from inclusion bodies that had to be solubilized and refolded (6). To overcome solubility problems, the regA* gene was translationally linked to an intein/chitin binding domain at its carboxyl terminus (see "Materials and Methods"). Upon overexpression, we observed that appreciable amounts of the RegA*-intein/CBD fusion protein were in the soluble fraction of crude cell lysates and that the protein could be purified easily using a chitin affinity column. Another advantage of this system is that the chitin-bound fusion protein can undergo self-splicing at the intein junction releasing native RegA* protein from the column. SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis revealed that RegA* purified with this expression system was the expected 21 kDa in size and that purity was greater than 95% (Fig. 4).
|
DNA Binding Capability of RegA*--
To examine whether RegA*
exhibited DNA binding activity, we conducted DNase I protection assays
using 32P-labeled probes of the puf and
puc promoter regions. As indicated in Fig.
5, A and B, RegA*
protected two regions of the puf promoter from DNase I
digestion including strong protection of nucleotides 22 to
51 and
weaker protection of nucleotides
68 to
80 relative to the
transcription start site. The
22 to
51 region overlaps a DNA
sequence with dyad symmetry that is conserved for puf
promoters from other species of photosynthetic bacteria (3, 28) and overlaps a conserved
24 sequence that has been proposed to be a
recognition sequence for an alternative sigma factor for the puf promoter (2, 3, 28). Similarly, two areas of DNase I
protection were evident for the puc promoter extending from
52 to
69 and
73 to
80 (Figs. 6
and 7). DNase I-hypersensitive sites were
also evident within or flanking the RegA*-protected regions in both the
puf and puc promoter regions (Fig. 7). Equivalent amounts of RegA* were required to obtain distinct regions of protection at the puf and puc promoters, suggesting that the
protein had a similar binding affinity for both probes.
|
|
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The exact role of RegA in promoting anaerobic induction of photosynthesis gene expression has been somewhat controversial. RegA and its homologs from other species exhibit high homology to other response regulators in the amino-terminal receiver domain and little homology to other response regulators in the short (50 amino acid) carboxyl effector domain (4, 29) In RegA the receiver domain is separated from the effector domain by a short hinge comprised of 2-4 prolines (Fig. 1), whereas in other response regulators the hinge is composed of a flexible 10-amino acid helix (29, 38). Careful analysis of the RegA effector domain reveals a sequence that resembles a helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif (30) (Fig. 1). However, previous attempts by our laboratory to demonstrate DNA binding with wild type RegA failed. This led to the speculation that RegA may be an intermediate in a multicomponent phosphotransfer cascade (2, 3, 5, 31). The results of this study provide the first direct evidence that RegA is indeed a DNA binding response regulator that directly affects the transcription of its target genes.
Although it is still a formal possibility that RegA* may be activated
in vivo by an alternative kinase, the simplest explanation is that the mutant protein bypasses the necessity for phosphorylation to function as a transcriptional activator. How then could an alanine
to serine substitution at position 95 result in a constitutively active
RegA protein? Mutations in the same region of other DNA binding
response regulators, such as BsuSpo0A (Q90K, 92Y), EcoNarL (V88A), and
EcoOmpR (G94S, G94D, E96A), have been reported to influence the
activities of the corresponding proteins dramatically (for review, see
Ref. 29). According to crystallographic structural analysis of CheY and
NarL (32, 33), these mutations all cluster in the 4
helix, which is located in close proximity to the hinge/linker region
that functions to separate the receiver domain from the helix-turn-helix DNA binding domain. For RegA*, the substitution of
serine for alanine creates an increase of the side group volume, as
well as hydrophobicity, which could affect interactions of the
4 helix with the hinge region to lock the protein in its active conformation.
It is interesting that RegA binds much closer to the start site of
transcription in the puf operon promoter (22 to
80) than in the puc promoter (
52 to
80). The puc
promoter has a sequence motif that is very similar to housekeeping
genes, indicating that it most likely uses a "sigma-70" subunit for
promoter recognition (see black boxes in Fig. 7). However,
the puf operon does not exhibit a canonical sigma-70
sequence motif, leading to the speculation that it may use a secondary
sigma factor for promoter recognition (2, 3, 20, 28). If so, then the
close location of the RegA binding site to the puf
transcription start site may be construed as additional evidence for
the existence of a secondary sigma subunit that requires a different
placement of RegA to promote activation of transcription. The RegA
binding site on the puf promoter also overlaps a sequence
that contains a dyad symmetry that is reasonably well conserved among
puf promoters from different species (3, 20, 28). Mutational
analysis has indicated that this palindrome may bind an aerobic
repressor (34, 35). Thus, regulation of puf expression may
involve a competition between RegA and a repressor for overlapping
binding sites. A similar situation exists for the puc operon
whose expression is affected by anaerobic activation by RegA as well as
aerobic repression by CrtJ (36). Footprint analysis indicates that CrtJ
binds to the palindrome TGT-N12-ACA, which is present in
two copies in the bchC promoter (25). A similar palindrome
is located in the puc operon at positions
39 to
56
relative to the start site of transcription (3, 36) which overlaps the
RegA binding site defined in this study (Fig. 7). Thus, regulation of
puc expression may also involve competition in binding
between RegA and the repressor CrtJ.
Inspection of the RegA binding site in the puf and puc promoters does not show any obvious sequence conservation other than a bias for a high GC content (Fig. 7). The absence of a recognizable consensus sequence suggests that the specificity of RegA binding might be determined by structural features of the DNA rather than to a specific nucleotide sequence. This is not unlike that seen with the Bacillus subtilis regulator AbrB, which, like RegA, is a global regulator that binds to promoters in a sequence-nonspecific manner (37, 38). It has been postulated that the lack of sequence specificity of AbrB allows much greater flexibility in binding to a wide variety of promoters than would be observed with a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein (37, 38). This feature presumably allows the cell to control many different operons with a single regulator. Indeed, there is growing evidence that the RegA-RegB regulatory circuit in R. capsulatus affects several anaerobic physiological processes other than photosynthesis, including carbon and nitrogen assimilation (31, 39). Highly conserved homologs for RegA and RegB have also been found in several other species such as the related photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides and the non-photosynthetic purple bacterium Rhizobium meliloti (Fig. 1) (40, 41). Rather surprising is the observation that the putative helix-turn-helix motif in RegA is completely conserved among these different species (Fig. 1). This indicates that the mechanism of recognizing target promoters by RegA homologs is a highly conserved feature. Undoubtedly, continued studies of the RegA in these additional species will provide further insights into the extent and nature of the RegB-RegA regulon.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
---|
We thank members of the Photosynthetic Bacteria Group for stimulating discussions.
![]() |
FOOTNOTES |
---|
* This work is supported by National Institutes of Health Grants GM40941 and GM00618 (to C. E. B).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biology,
Indiana University, Jordan Hall, Bloomington, IN 47405. Tel.: 812-855-6595; Fax.:812-855-6705; E-mail: cbauer{at}bio.indiana.edu.
1 The abbreviations used are: LH-I, light harvesting-I; LH-II, light harvesting-II; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; CBD, chitin binding domain.
2 S. Du, T. H. Bird, and C. E. Bauer, unpublished data.
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|