An Alternate Promoter Directs Expression of a Truncated, Muscle-specific Isoform of the Human Ankyrin 1 Gene*

Patrick G. GallagherDagger and Bernard G. Forget

From the Departments of Pediatrics, Internal Medicine, and Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8021

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Ankyrin 1, an erythrocyte membrane protein that links the underlying cytoskeleton to the plasma membrane, is also expressed in brain and muscle. We cloned a truncated, muscle-specific ankyrin 1 cDNA composed of novel 5' sequences and 3' sequences previously identified in the last 3 exons of the human ankyrin 1 erythroid gene. Northern blot analysis revealed expression restricted to cardiac and skeletal muscle tissues. Deduced amino acid sequence of this muscle cDNA predicted a peptide of 155 amino acids in length with a hydrophobic NH2 terminus. Cloning of the corresponding chromosomal gene revealed that the ankyrin 1 muscle transcript is composed of four exons spread over ~10 kilobase pairs of DNA. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction of skeletal muscle cDNA identified multiple cDNA isoforms created by alternative splicing. The ankyrin 1 muscle promoter was identified as a (G + C)-rich promoter located >200 kilobase pairs from the ankyrin 1 erythroid promoter. An ankyrin 1 muscle promoter fragment directed high level expression of a reporter gene in cultured C2C12 muscle cells, but not in HeLa or K562 (erythroid) cells. DNA-protein interactions were identified in vitro at a single Sp1 and two E box consensus binding sites contained within the promoter. A MyoD cDNA expression plasmid transactivated an ankyrin 1 muscle promoter fragment/reporter gene plasmid in a dose-dependent fashion in both HeLa and K562 cells. A polyclonal antibody raised to human ankyrin 1 muscle-specific sequences reacted with peptides of 28 and 30 kDa on immunoblots of human skeletal muscle.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Erythrocyte ankyrin, ankyrin 1, is the prototype of a family of homologous proteins that are involved in the local segregation of integral membrane proteins within functional domains on the plasma membrane (1-4). This important cellular localization of membrane proteins may be provided by the relative affinities of the many different isoforms of ankyrin for target proteins. This specialization appears to have evolved through the tissue-specific, developmentally regulated expression of multiple protein isoforms. The molecular mechanisms by which ankyrin has acquired distinct isoforms with specialized function(s) are beginning to be revealed. The isoform diversity of ankyrin arises from both different gene products and from differential, alternative splicing of the same gene product (5-9). In humans, the cDNAs for three ankyrin proteins have been cloned and their gene products studied. These ankyrins share similar antigenic sites and domain structures, differing in a number of ways such as their cellular patterns of expression and their relative affinities of binding to spectrin and band 3. Ankyrin binding has been described for a variety of proteins including membrane skeleton proteins, ion transport proteins, and cell adhesion molecules (1, 4).

Ankyrin 1, first discovered in preparations of erythrocyte membranes, provides the principal linkage between the spectrin-actin based erythrocyte membrane skeleton and the plasma membrane (1, 10-12). The primary structure of human ankyrin 1, deduced from cDNA clones obtained from a reticulocyte cDNA library, encodes a mature protein of 1881 amino acids (7, 8). Ankyrin 1 has been identified in erythroid tissue, brain, and muscle (7, 8, 13-17). The major form of ankyrin 1, ~210 kDa, is composed of three domains, an 89-kDa NH2-terminal domain composed of 24 conserved repeats known as cdc 10/ankyrin repeats that contain the binding site for band 3; a 62-kDa domain that contains the binding sites for spectrin and vimentin; and a 55-kDa COOH-terminal regulatory domain (1, 2, 4). Complex patterns of alternative splicing have been identified in the region encoding the regulatory domain (5, 13, 14, 17). The precise role(s) of the regulatory domain is unknown, but it does appear to modulate spectrin and band 3 binding (18, 19). Defects of ankyrin 1 have been implicated in approximately half of all patients with hereditary spherocytosis (20, 21).

Initial studies in muscle immunolocalized ankyrin to the sarcolemma adjacent to the Z lines co-distributed with spectrin, as well as at the neuromuscular junction, and at the muscle triads (22-26). Studies performed in muscle cells suggested that ankyrin accumulation and assembly into the membrane was determined by a control mechanism operative at the posttranslational level, triggered near the time of cell fusion and onset of terminal differentiation (27). Northern blot analyses by Birkenmeier and colleagues using an erythroid ankyrin 1 cDNA probe encoding the regulatory domain identified multiple transcripts in murine skeletal muscle RNA (13, 28). These transcripts ranged in size from 1.6 to 3.5 kb, compared with the 7.5 and 9 kb ankyrin 1 transcripts observed on Northern blots of erythroid RNA (29, 30). Northern blot analysis of RNA from chicken myotubes using an ankyrin 1 cDNA fragment as probe also identified a small 3.6-kb transcript (31).

Isoform diversity in different muscle cell types is frequently determined by the presence of muscle type-specific isoforms (32, 33). These isoforms may be encoded by separate genes, may be generated by alternative splicing of a given gene, or may be controlled by specific regulatory elements in or around a given gene at different times. For example, numerous isoforms of spectrin with varying patterns of cellular localization and developmental expression have been identified in muscle cells (3, 34-36). These isoforms are the products of separate genes or alternative splicing of individual genes (3, 36, 37). Recent studies have identified two populations of ankyrin 1 in muscle cells (38). One population was identified at the sarcolemma using an antibody to the spectrin binding domain of ankyrin. This localization is similar to previous observations. A second population was identified at the M and Z lines using an antibody to sequences identified previously in neural isoforms of ankyrin 1, also present in muscle (38).

This report describes the cloning of a novel, truncated, muscle-specific ankyrin 1 isoform, characterization of its corresponding genomic structure, study of its pattern of expression, and identification of its promoter. Because of similarities detected on Western blotting, the isoform described here is likely to be the one detected at the sarcoplasmic reticulum, providing additional evidence that two populations of ankyrin 1 are present in muscle. These observations extend the molecular basis of ankyrin 1 isoform diversity to include the use of an alternate NH2 terminus and a tissue-specific alternate promoter.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

RNA Preparation and Northern Blot Analyses-- Total RNA was prepared from human skeletal muscle, or from the human tissue culture cell lines RD (human rhabdomyosarcoma, embryonal, ATCC 136-CCL), K562 (chronic myelogenous leukemia in blast crisis with erythroid characteristics, ATCC CCL 243), and HeLa (epithelioid carcinoma, cervix, ATCC CCL 2) as described previously (39). Multiple-tissue Northern blots containing 2 µg of poly(A)+ mRNA per tissue were obtained from CLONTECH (Palo Alto, CA). A human beta -actin cDNA probe was used as a control for loading in Northern blot analyses (40).

cDNA and Genomic DNA Cloning-- An 838-bp cDNA fragment was generated by 5' RACE and PCR using primers A and B (Table I) with human skeletal muscle cDNA as template. This fragment, which contains the entire coding region of the human ankyrin 1 muscle-specific cDNA (see below) was used as the hybridization probe to screen a random- and oligo(dT)-primed human skeletal muscle cDNA library in lambda gt11 (CLONTECH). A human ankyrin 1 cDNA fragment, pAnk15 (8), containing the 3' end of the human ANK-1 muscle transcript was used as a hybridization probe to screen a human genomic DNA library. The library is a Charon 4A bacteriophage library containing fragments of genomic DNA partially digested with AluI and HaeIII with EcoRI linkers added. For both library screens, selected recombinants that hybridized to the screening probes were purified, subcloned, and analyzed by standard techniques.

Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends (RACE)1-- 5' RACE was performed as described (41, 42). 1 µg of human skeletal muscle RNA was reverse transcribed using primer C (see Table I). Single-stranded oligonucleotide ligation and PCR amplification were carried out using primer D and primers A and B, respectively. Amplification products were subcloned and sequenced.

Primer Extension Analyses-- The transcription start site of the muscle-specific ankyrin 1 cDNA isoform was determined using primer extension analysis. Primers E or F (see Table I) were used in primer extension reactions as described elsewhere (43). Templates in these reactions were 20 µg of total RNA from the human cell lines RD and HeLa, or 10 µg of tRNA.

Cell Culture-- The tissue culture cell lines C2C12 (murine muscle myoblast, ATCC 1772-CRL), RD, K562, and HeLa were used to study expression of the putative promoter of the muscle-specific isoform of the ankyrin 1 gene. C2C12, RD, and K562 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% fetal calf serum. HeLa cells were maintained in Eagle's minimal essential medium with 10% fetal calf serum. C2C12 cells were maintained as myoblasts for all experiments described.

Preparation of Promoter-Reporter Plasmids-- Test plasmids were prepared by inserting a 2.1-kb fragment of the 5'-flanking ankyrin 1 muscle-specific genomic DNA upstream of the firefly luciferase reporter gene in the plasmid pGL2B (Promega, Madison, WI). Serial truncations of this 2.1-kb fragment in the pGL2B plasmid were constructed using convenient restriction enzyme sites or PCR amplification. Test plasmids were sequenced to exclude cloning or PCR-generated artifacts.

Transient Transfections and Transactivation Assays-- All plasmids tested were purified using Qiagen columns (Qiagen, Inc., Chatsworth, CA) and at least two preparations of each plasmid were tested. 107 K562 cells were transfected by electroporation with a single pulse of 300 V at 960 uF with 20 µg of test plasmid and 0.5 µg of pCMVbeta , a mammalian reporter plasmid expressing beta -galactosidase driven by the human cytomegalovirus immediate early gene promoter (CLONTECH). 105 C2C12 or HeLa cells were transfected with 2.0 µg of test plasmid and 0.25 µg of the pCMVbeta plasmid by lipofection using 4 µl of LipofectAMINE (Life Technologies, Inc.). Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were harvested and lysed, and the activity of both luciferase and beta -galactosidase activity was determined in cell extracts. All assays were performed in triplicate. Differences in transfection efficiency were determined by co-transfection with the pCMVbeta plasmid. For transactivation assays, K562 and HeLa cells were transfected using 5 and 1 µg of reporter plasmid, respectively, and varying amounts of a MyoD cDNA expression plasmid, phMyoD (EMBL no. X56677), and reporter gene activity were assayed as above.

Gel Mobility Shift Analyses-- Nuclear extracts were prepared from RD, C2C12, K562, and HeLa cells by hypotonic lysis, followed by high salt extraction of nuclei as described by Andrews and Faller (44). Binding reactions were carried out as described (45, 46). Competitor oligonucleotides were added at molar excesses of 10- or 100-fold. Resulting complexes were separated by electrophoresis through 6% polyacrylamide gels at 21 °C.

Immunoblot Analyses-- A rabbit-specific polyclonal antibody was raised to a synthetic peptide, ISPRVVRRRVFLKGN, conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin and bovine serum albumin (Immuno-Dynamics, La Jolla, CA). The sequence of this peptide is contained in the novel, muscle-specific region of ankyrin 1. After 12 weeks, anti-peptide antisera was collected, then affinity purified on a column to which the synthetic peptide had been covalently linked. Human erythrocyte membranes and skeletal muscle homogenates were prepared as described previously (47, 48). These erythroid and muscle fractions were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on a 4-20% gel and either stained with Coomassie Blue or transferred onto nitrocellulose and immunoblotted. Immunoblotting was performed as described elsewhere (49).

Computer Analyses-- Computer-assisted analyses of derived nucleotide and predicted amino acid sequences were performed utilizing the sequence analysis software package of the University of Wisconsin Genetics Computer Group (UW GCG; Madison, WI) (50) and the BLAST algorithm, National Center for Biotechnology Information (Bethesda, MD) (51).

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Identification of Novel Ankyrin 1 Sequences in Muscle-- Northern blot analyses of human skeletal muscle RNA with human ankyrin 1 erythroid cDNA probes encoding the repeat-domain (pAnk58), the spectrin-binding domain (pAnk37), or the regulatory domain (pAnk15) (8) yielded hybridization signals of 2.3 and 1.6 kb only when the regulatory domain probe was used (see below). These results are in contrast to Northern blot analyses of human erythroid RNA using these probes where hybridization signals of 7.3 and 9.0 kb are seen with all three domain-specific probes (7, 8). To identify the molecular basis of these truncated transcripts, we performed 5' RACE using oligonucleotide primers A (sense, linker) and B and C (antisense, both in the 3'-untranslated region of the erythroid cDNA), with total human skeletal muscle RNA as a template. This yielded a set of cDNA products, the longest 838 bp in length. Nucleotide sequence analysis of this product revealed a novel 5' end including 5'-untranslated sequences, an initiator methionine, and 219 bp of novel sequence with an open reading frame. The 3' end of this RACE product was composed of sequences previously identified in erythroid or neural ankyrin 1 cDNA transcripts, including 309 bp of 3' in-frame sequence.

Isolation and Analysis of Recombinant cDNA and Genomic DNA Clones-- This 838-bp skeletal muscle RACE product was used as probe to screen a human skeletal muscle cDNA library. Eight clones that hybridized to the screening probe were isolated after primary screening of a human skeletal muscle cDNA library. Three clones were purified, subcloned and sequenced (Fig. 1). The clones varied in size from 1096 to 2543 bp. All three clones contained 5'-untranslated sequence, an open reading frame of 528 bp (the same identified in the RACE product) and 3'-untranslated sequences (Fig. 2A). Primer extension predicted an additional 43 bp of upstream sequence from the end of clone lambda 2, the clone extending the most 5' of analyzed clones (not shown). An additional 42 bp of upstream 5' untranslated sequence was obtained by 5' RACE. Sequences obtained by RACE were verified by comparison to corresponding genomic DNA sequences (see below). The sequences around the transcription start site, CCA+1CTCA, closely match transcription initiation recognition sequences, YYA+1NWYY (52). Collectively, these data suggest that this cDNA sequence is at or very near the 5' end of the ankyrin 1 muscle cDNA.


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.  

Structure of the human ankyrin 1 muscle cDNA. The open reading frame is denoted by the box. The locations of the initiation and termination codons are shown. The locations of oligomer primers used in RACE and primer extension are shown. Sequences obtained by 5' RACE are denoted by a solid box. The divergent 3'-untranslated sequences of clones lambda 6 and lambda 47 are denoted by solid and dashed lines, respectively.The locations of exons are denoted by the solid triangles; the locations of alternative splices are denoted by the unfilled triangles. B, alternate 3'-untranslated sequence of clone lambda 47. The sequence of clone lambda 47 diverged from that of lambda 6 at nucleotide 1103 in the 3'-untranslated region, suggesting that alternative splicing and polyadenylation may be present.


View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Nucleotide sequence with predicted amino acid sequence of human ankyrin 1 muscle cDNA. A, a composite nucleotide sequence shown was determined from clones lambda 2, lambda 6, and 5' RACE products. The initiation codon and the termination codons are double underlined.

Two different untranslated regions were identified in the lambda  cDNA clones, lambda 6 and lambda 47 (Fig. 1). The first 422 bp of the 3' untranslated region of lambda 6 are identical to those in the ankyrin 1 erythroid 3'-untranslated region, then the sequence diverges (Fig. 2A). The first 322 bp of the 3'-untranslated region of lambda 47 are identical to those in the ankyrin 1 erythroid 3'-untranslated region, then the sequence diverges (Fig. 2B). A polyadenylation consensus signal was not identified in either clone. These novel 3'-untranslated sequences did not match any sequences in the available data bases and were not contained in our most 3' ankyrin 1 genomic clones.

The predicted initiator methionine is located at positions 251-253 (Fig. 2A). The sequences around this translation start site match important consensus sequences, specifically, there is an A in position -3 from the predicted initiator methionine (53). A termination codon is located 150 bp upstream of the predicted initiator methionine; no additional ATGs are present in the intervening 150 bp. Deduced amino acid sequence of the open reading frame predicts a peptide of 155 amino acids with a predicted molecular mass of 17.6 kDa and a pI of 6.5. Secondary structure predictions of the muscle-specific protein predict the presence of two domains, a highly charged NH2-terminal domain followed by a COOH-terminal domain composed of alternating alpha  helix and beta  sheet. These sequences do not contain the membrane binding domain, the spectrin/fodrin binding domain, and most of the regulatory domain found in the erythroid ankyrin 1 gene transcript.

Two overlapping genomic DNA clones were isolated that contained the entire ankyrin 1 muscle cDNA sequence. Analysis of its structure revealed that this transcript is composed of 4 exons spread over ~10 kb of DNA (Fig. 3, top). There is a novel exon one, followed by sequences present in the erythroid cDNA transcripts encoded by exons 40, 41, and 42. This novel exon 1, labeled 39a in Fig. 3, is located in intron 39 of the erythroid gene. The first and fourth exons contain untranslated sequences; the 5'-untranslated region is 250 bp in length. Comparison of the exon/intron boundaries with reported consensus sequences reveals that the ag:gt rule was not violated at any splice junction (54, 55). There are no AG dinucleotides within the 15 bp upstream of the 3' (acceptor) splice junctions. The coding sequences for the hydrophobic domain of the ankyrin 1 muscle protein are contained entirely within the novel exon one.


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Genomic organization of the human ankyrin 1 muscle transcript. Top, genomic organization of the human ankyrin 1 gene encoding the full-length erythroid transcript. Bottom, enlarged diagram of the genomic organization of the region of the human ankyrin 1 gene encoding the truncated muscle transcript. Two overlapping clones containing the entire ankyrin 1 muscle transcript were isolated from a human genomic DNA library. These clones spanned a distance of >10 kb. Individual exons are denoted by closed boxes. The novel muscle-specific exon 1 is denoted as exon 39a. Transcription initiation sites are denoted by the arrows.

Additional RACE products identified three additional muscle-specific isoforms generated by alternative splicing (Fig. 4, isoforms 2-4). Comparison of these isoforms with the genomic organization demonstrate that these four isoforms vary in their usage of exon 41. The function of these isoforms is unknown. In erythroid and neural tissue, complex patterns of alternative splicing of exon 41 have been observed (5). However, the patterns of alternative splicing observed in muscle cDNA differ from those observed in erythroid and neural cDNA isoforms.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Human ankyrin 1 muscle cDNA isoforms. A, the genomic organization of the region of the human ankyrin 1 gene encoding the muscle isoform. B, a diagrammatic representation of alternately spliced isoforms identified by PCR amplification of human skeletal muscle cDNA using primers flanking the coding region of the human ankyrin 1 muscle transcript. The initiator methionine and termination codons are denoted by ATG and TGA, respectively. The sequences at alternate splices are shown below the location of the corresponding splice. The predicted molecular masses (kDa) and isoelectric points (pI) of isoforms 1 through 4, respectively are: isoform 1, 17.6/6.5; isoform 2, 15.2/7.4; isoform 3, 12.5/5.0; and isoform 4, 8.3/11.2.

Expression of the Novel Ankyrin 1 Exon Is Restricted to Cardiac and Skeletal Muscle Tissue-- Northern blot analysis using the 838-bp ankyrin 1 muscle cDNA RACE product detected abundant mRNAs of 2.3 and 1.6 kb in cardiac and skeletal muscle tissues (Fig. 5). Signals of 3.7 and 7.0 kb were also detected, but in lesser amounts compared with 2.3 and 1.6 kb. These signals may represent ankyrin 1 muscle transcripts generated by alternative splicing, or, for the 7.0-kb signal, cross-hybridization with the erythroid ankyrin 1 isoform.


View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Northern blot analyses. A, samples of 2 µg of poly(A)+ RNA from various human tissues were hybridized to a [32P]dCTP-labeled 838-bp ankyrin 1 muscle cDNA fragment obtained by 5' RACE (see text for details). Abundant mRNA was detected in skeletal muscle and heart tissue. B, the same blots were stripped and hybridized to a [32P]dCTP-labeled human beta -actin cDNA probe as a control for loading. Note that in skeletal and cardiac muscle, both the expected 1.6-1.8- and 2.0-kb signals are seen after hybridization with this beta -actin probe.

Identification of the Ankyrin 1 Gene Muscle Promoter-- The nucleotide sequence of the 5'-flanking genomic DNA upstream of the human ankyrin muscle cDNA transcription start site is shown in Fig. 6. Inspection of the sequences reveals features characteristic of a muscle-specific gene promoter including lack of consensus CCAAT sequences and a high G + C content (61%, between nucleotides -245 and +18).


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   5'-Flanking genomic DNA sequence. The nucleotide sequences of the 5'-flanking genomic DNA of the human ankyrin 1 muscle transcript are shown. Consensus sequences for potential DNA-protein binding sites are underlined. The location of a recognition sequence for a TATA box is also underlined.

To investigate if this 5'-flanking DNA was capable of directing expression of a reporter gene in cultured cells, transient transfection assays were performed. A test plasmid containing a DNA fragment from about -2100 to -14 fused to a luciferase reporter gene was transfected into muscle (C2C12), erythroid (K562), or nonerythroid (NIH3T3) cells. The relative luciferase activity was determined 24 h after transfection and compared with the activity obtained with pGL2B, a negative control, the promoterless plasmid, and pGL2P, a positive control, the luciferase reporter gene under control of the SV40 early promoter. As shown in Fig. 7, the muscle ankyrin 1 gene promoter plasmid, p-2100, directed high level expression of the luciferase reporter gene in muscle cells, but not in erythroid and nonerythroid cells. Deletional analysis of this 2.1-kb ankyrin 1 gene promoter fragment identified a 170-bp minimal promoter fragment, p-184, that directed ankyrin 1 gene muscle-specific expression. This DNA fragment contains two E boxes and an Sp1 site, a combination shown to be adequate for expression of a minimal promoter in other muscle-specific genes.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Activity of the ankyrin 1 gene muscle promoter in muscle, erythroid, and nonerythroid cell lines in transient transfection assays. Plasmids containing 5'-flanking DNA of the ankyrin 1 muscle transcript inserted upstream of the firefly luciferase gene were transfected into C2C12 (muscle), K562 (erythroid), or HeLa cells as described. Relative luciferase activity was expressed as that obtained from the test plasmids versus the activity obtained from the pGL2B promoterless plasmid after correction for transfection efficiency. The results represent the means ± S.D. of at least six independent transfection experiments. Consensus binding sites in the ankyrin 1 muscle promoter for GATA, Sp1, and E boxes are denoted by the ellipse, the rectangle, and the triangle, respectively.

The Human Ankyrin 1 Gene Muscle Promoter Contains Binding Sites for Sp1 and MyoD-- Consensus sequences for a number of potential DNA-binding proteins, including Sp1, GATA-1, and two E boxes were present in the ankyrin 1 gene muscle promoter (Fig. 6). E boxes are binding sites for members of the MyoD family of basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors that are important in controlling muscle-specific gene expression. To determine if nuclear proteins could bind these sites in vitro, double-stranded oligonucleotides containing the corresponding ankyrin 1 muscle sequences (Sp1 G + H; E box left I + J; E box-right K + L; GATA M + N; Table I) or control sequences (Sp1 O + P (56, 57); E box Q + R (58); GATA-1 S + T (59)) were prepared and used in gel shift analyses.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Oligonucleotide primers

When either of the E box site-containing oligonucleotides were used in gel shift analyses, a single retarded species was observed in RD (muscle) nuclear extracts (Fig. 8). This species migrated at the same location as a control oligonucleotide containing the left E box of the murine creatine kinase gene (58). For both ankyrin 1 E boxes, the single species was effectively competed by an excess of homologous unlabeled oligonucleotide, the other ankyrin 1 muscle E box oligonucleotide, and the creatine kinase control oligonucleotide. Nuclear extracts from K562 and HeLa cells did not bind either of the ankyrin 1 E box oligonucleotides or the control creatine kinase E box oligonucleotide.


View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Gel shift analyses of the E box-consensus binding sites in the human ankyrin 1 muscle promoter. Gel shift analyses were performed with [32P]ATP-labeled, double-stranded oligonucleotides containing the left and right E box binding sites of the ankyrin 1 muscle promoter and a control E box site from the murine creatine kinase promoter, and nuclear extracts (N.E.) from RD muscle cells. Protein-DNA complexes migrating at the same location were obtained using all 3 double-stranded oligonucleotides. Unlabeled double-stranded oligonucleotides added in excess to the binding reactions effectively competed the protein-DNA complexes.

When oligonucleotides containing the ankyrin 1 muscle promoter Sp1 site or a control, high affinity Sp1 binding site (56, 57) were used in gel shift analyses, major and minor complexes were observed in RD nuclear extracts (Fig. 9A). The ankyrin 1 muscle complexes are both competed by an excess of homologous unlabeled oligonucleotide and the control Sp1 oligonucleotide. The ankyrin 1 muscle promoter Sp1 oligonucleotide competed most, but not all of the complex formed by the control Sp1 oligonucleotide in RD extracts. Similar results were obtained when K562 and HeLa extracts were used with these oligonucleotides in gel shift analyses (not shown).


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Gel shift analyses of the Sp1 and GATA-1 consensus binding sites in the human ankyrin 1 muscle promoter. A, gel shift analyses were performed with [32P]ATP-labeled, double-stranded oligonucleotides containing the Sp1 consensus binding site of the ankyrin 1 muscle promoter and a control oligonucleotide containing a high affinity Sp1 binding site and nuclear extracts from RD muscle cells. Protein-DNA complexes migrating at the same location were obtained using both double-stranded oligonucleotides. Unlabeled double-stranded oligonucleotides added in excess to the binding reactions effectively competed the protein-DNA complexes. Similar results were obtained when K562 and HeLa nuclear extracts were used with these oligonucleotides in gel shift analyses (not shown). B, gel shift analyses were performed with [32P]ATP-labeled, double-stranded oligonucleotides containing the GATA-1 consensus binding site of the ankyrin 1 muscle promoter and a control oligonucleotide containing the GATA-1 binding site of the ankyrin 1 erythroid promoter and nuclear extracts from K562 erythroid cells. A protein-DNA complex was obtained only when the control oligonucleotide was used. Homologous, unlabeled ankyrin 1 erythroid GATA-1 control oligonucleotide added in excess to the binding reaction effectively competed the control protein-DNA complex in K562 cells, but the ankyrin 1 muscle GATA-1 oligonucleotide did not. In addition, the ankyrin 1 muscle GATA-1 oligonucleotide did not form any protein-DNA complexes when RD muscle cell, or HeLa cell nuclear extracts were used in gel shift analyses (not shown).

An oligonucleotide containing the ankyrin 1 muscle promoter GATA motif did not form any complexes in gel shift analyses when RD, K562, or HeLa extracts were used. This oligonucleotide did not compete the complexes formed by an oligonucleotide containing the erythroid ankyrin 1 promoter GATA-1 sequence (Fig. 9B) (59).

MyoD Transactivates the Human Muscle Ankyrin 1 Gene Promoter in Heterologous Cells-- None of the ankyrin 1 muscle promoter fragments directed expression of a reporter gene in K562 or HeLa cells, but the addition of MyoD by co-transfection conferred promoter activity to these fragments. Co-transfection of 1 µg of the ankyrin 1 minimal muscle promoter/reporter plasmid, p-184, and increasing amounts of a MyoD cDNA expression plasmid into HeLa cells resulted in increasing promoter activity with increasing amounts of MyoD plasmid (Fig. 10, top). Similar results were observed in co-transfection experiments in K562 cells (Fig. 10, bottom). The ability of MyoD to transcriptionally activate the ankyrin 1 muscle promoter in these cells which do not contain this muscle-specific factor, correlates with the inability of the ankyrin 1 muscle promoter to function in these cells.


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   MyoD transactivates the ankyrin 1 muscle promoter in heterologous cells. A minimal ankyrin 1 muscle promoter/luciferase reporter plasmid (p-184, Fig. 7) was cotransfected with increasing amounts of a MyoD cDNA expression plasmid into HeLa (top) or K562 (bottom) cells (see text for details). Dose-dependent activation of the ankyrin 1 muscle promoter was observed in both cell types.

Immunoblotting-- Immunoblots of human erythrocyte membrane ghosts and skeletal muscle homogenates using the affinity-purified anti-peptide antibody 2401, raised against sequences unique to the ankyrin 1 muscle isoform, detected bands of 28 and 30 kDa in skeletal muscle (Fig. 11). Longer exposures revealed a band at 70 kDa in both skeletal muscle and erythrocyte membranes and a band at 210 kDa in erythrocyte membranes. A polyclonal antibody raised to ankyrin 2.1 from erythrocyte membranes (kindly supplied by Jon S. Morrow) detected bands of 205 and 210 kDa in erythrocyte membranes (Fig. 11). Longer exposure demonstrated a band of 210 kDa in skeletal muscle. The identity of the 70-kDa band detected in skeletal muscle homogenates and erythrocyte membranes is unknown, but it was highly reproducible and was identified in immunoblots of RD cells (not shown).


View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11.   Immunoblotting. Human skeletal muscle homogenates (M) and erythrocyte membrane ghosts (E) were separated by SDS-PAGE in a 4-20% gel. The gel was cut and part transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. A, incubation of a strip of this membrane with an anti-peptide antibody raised to ankyrin 1 muscle-specific sequences identified bands 28 and 30 kDa in skeletal muscle. Longer exposures demonstrated a band at 70 kDa in both skeletal muscle and erythrocyte membranes and a band at 210 kDa in erythrocyte membranes. B, incubation of a separate strip of this membrane to a polyclonal antibody raised to erythrocyte ankyrin detected bands of 205 and 210 kDa in erythrocyte membranes. Longer exposure demonstrated a band of 210 kDa in skeletal muscle. C, segment of the gel stained with Coomassie Blue.

Computer Analyses-- When compared with sequences present in available data bases, significant homology was demonstrated only between the novel human ankyrin 1 muscle-specific gene sequence and a corresponding murine sequence. The identity between the translated sequence of the human ankyrin 1 muscle isoform and the translated murine sequence was 91% with a similarity of 94%. Searching using only the highly charged 73 amino acid NH2 terminus also failed to reveal any significant homologies.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The diversity of the numerous ankyrin family isoforms appears to be critical for specific cellular functions. Of the three ankyrin family proteins cloned, ankyrin 1 is considered to have the most limited pattern of expression, with expression restricted to erythroid, muscle and neural tissue. Despite these "limitations," the ankyrin 1 erythroid cDNA has at least 15 different transcripts generated by alternative splicing and/or alternative polyadenylation (5). The identification of a muscle-tissue-specific isoform with multiple transcripts generated by alternative splicing under the control of an alternate, tissue-specific promoter adds to this diversity. Interestingly, truncated isoforms of ankyrin 3, the ankyrin isoform with the widest pattern of tissue distribution, have been localized to the cytoplasm and Golgi apparatus of kidney and muscle cells as well as to the lysosomes of macrophages (6, 60-62). These truncated isoforms, however, lack only the NH2-terminal membrane-binding domain.

The regulation of truncated, tissue-specific isoforms of the ankyrin 1 gene by the use of an alternate promoter is similar to that observed in MCL1/3 or dystrophin gene transcripts (63-68). In dystrophin, five autonomous promoters direct the transcription of respective alternate first exons in a cell-specific and developmentally controlled manner (63). Two of these promoters direct the expression of transcripts encoding only the COOH terminus of dystrophin, utilizing exons 56-79 or exons 63-79, respectively, in a manner similar to muscle ankyrin 1, which utilizes exons 40-42. Remarkably, like ankyrin-1, the tissue-specific promoters of dystrophin may be remote (>100 kb) from each other.

The functions of the two populations of ankyrin 1 in muscle are unknown. The co-localization of the 210-kDa ankyrin isoform with spectrin at the sarcomere suggests a role for ankyrin in providing a linkage between the membrane skeleton to the plasma membrane, as it does in the erythrocyte. The truncated ankyrin 1 isoform lacking the membrane and spectrin binding domains localized to the Z and M lines of internal myofibrils and was highly enriched in the sarcoplasmic reticululm (38). The hydrophobic NH2 terminus of the truncated ankyrin 1 isoform could insert into the sarcoplasmic reticulum membrane, with the COOH terminus serving as a ligand for myoplasmic proteins. The specificity of the truncated ankyrin 1 for different protein ligands could be provided by the isoforms generated by alternative splicing. The antibody used to immunolocalize the truncated muscle ankyrin isoform was raised to sequences shared by ankyrin 1 neural and muscle cDNA isoforms (5, 38). There were similarities detected on immunoblots of skeletal muscle using this antibody and our muscle-specific antibody 2401. Together, these data suggest that the isoform described here is likely to be the same one detected at the sarcoplasmic reticulum. The sequence of this isoform does not match any others in available data bases, suggesting that this may represent a novel class of proteins.

Defects in ankyrin 1 are the most common cause of typical hereditary spherocytosis (HS) in humans. Interestingly, kindreds with HS and co-segregating myopathic manifestations have been described, including two brothers with HS, a movement disorder and myopathy (69), and a three-generation Russian kindred with co-segregating HS and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (70). It is tempting to speculate that these patients have a mutation in the very 3' end of the ankyrin 1 gene in the region that is common to both erythroid and muscle ankyrin 1 transcripts or in critical tissue-specific control elements.

Different mutations or deletions of the dystrophin muscle promoter have been described in patients with Becker muscular dystrophy and in patients with severe cardiomyopathy, demonstrating that a mutation may specifically affect either the cardiac or skeletal muscle expression of a gene that is expressed in both cell types (71-74). It will be important to identify the factors that control cardiac- and skeletal muscle-specific expression of ankyrin 1, as this information may aid in the identification of the defects in HS patients with co-segregating skeletal muscle or cardiac myopathic symptoms. One potential regulatory factor is GATA-4, a member of the GATA family of transcription factors expressed in cardiac and foregut derivatives (75, 76). A potential GATA binding site is located in upstream 5'-flanking genomic DNA of the ankyrin 1 muscle promoter. GATA-4 appears to direct expression of a number of muscle-associated genes primarily in cardiac muscle (72, 77-82).

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank C. Wong and Y. Wang for skilled technical assistance, C. Birkenmeier and J. Barker for helpful discussions and for communication of unpublished sequence information, Dr. Sonia Pearson-White for the MyoD cDNA expression plasmid, and Dr. Jon S. Morrow for the ankyrin 1 antibody.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health, the March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation, and the American Heart Association-Connecticut Affiliate.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF005213, AF005214, and AF005215.

Dagger To whom all correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St., P. O. Box 208064, New Haven, CT 06520-8064. Tel.: 203-737-2896; Fax: 203-785-5426; E-mail: Patrick_Gallagher{at}QM.Yale.edu.

1 RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA ends; HS, hereditary spherocytosis; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; bp, base pair(s); kb, kilobase pair(s).

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Bennett, V. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 8703-8706[Free Full Text]
  2. Lambert, S., and Bennett, V. (1993) Eur. J. Biochem. 211, 1-6[Abstract]
  3. Morrow, J. S., Rimm, D. L., Kennedy, S. P., Cianci, C. D., Sinard, J. H., Weed, S. A. (1996) in Handbook of Physiology (Hoffman, J., and Jamieson, J., eds), pp. 485-540, Oxford, London
  4. Peters, L. L., and Lux, S. E. (1993) Semin. Hematol. 30, 85-118[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Gallagher, P., Tse, W., Scarpa, A., Lux, S., and Forget, B. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 19220-19228[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Kordeli, E., Lambert, S., and Bennett, V. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 2352-2359[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Lambert, S., Yu, H., Prchal, J. T., Lawler, J., Ruff, P., Speicher, D., Cheung, M. C., Kan, Y. W., Palek, J. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 1730-1734[Abstract]
  8. Lux, S. E., John, K. M., and Bennett, V. (1990) Nature 344, 36-42[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Otto, E., Kunimoto, M., McLaughlin, T., and Bennett, V. (1991) J. Cell Biol. 114, 241-253[Abstract]
  10. Davis, L. H., and Bennett, V. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 10589-10596[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Davis, L. H., Otto, E., and Bennett, V. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 11163-11169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Platt, O. S., Lux, S. E., and Falcone, J. F. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 24421-24426[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Birkenmeier, C. S., White, R. A., Peters, L. L., Hall, E. J., Lux, S. E., Barker, J. E. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 9533-9540[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Jarolim, P., Rubin, H., and Palek, J. (1992) Blood 80, 144a
  15. Kordeli, E., Davis, J., Trapp, B., and Bennett, V. (1990) J. Cell Biol. 110, 1341-1352[Abstract]
  16. Kordeli, E., and Bennett, V. (1991) J. Cell Biol. 114, 1243-1259[Abstract]
  17. Lambert, S., and Bennett, V. (1993) J. Neurosci. 13, 3725-3735[Abstract]
  18. Davis, L. H., Davis, J. Q., and Bennett, V. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 18966-18972[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Hall, T. G., and Bennett, V. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 10537-10545[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Eber, S. W., Gonzalez, J. M., Lux, M. L., Scarpa, A. L., Tse, W. T., Dornwell, M., Herbers, J., Kugler, W., Ozcan, R., Pekrun, A., Gallagher, P. G., Schroter, W., Forget, B. G., Lux, S. E. (1996) Nat. Genet. 13, 214-218[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Lux, S. E., and Palek, J. (1995) in Blood: Principles and Practice of Hematology (Handin, R. I., Lux, S. E., and Stossel, T. P., eds), pp. 1701-1816, J. B. Lippincott, Philadelphia
  22. Craig, S. W., and Pardo, J. V. (1983) Cell Motil. 3, 449-462[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Flucher, B. E., and Daniels, M. P. (1989) Neuron 3, 163-175[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Flucher, B. E., Morton, M. E., Froehner, S. C., Daniels, M. P. (1990) Neuron 5, 339-351[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Nelson, W. J., and Lazarides, E. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81, 3292-3296[Abstract]
  26. Pardo, J. V., Siliciano, J. D., and Craig, S. W. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 80, 1008-1012[Abstract]
  27. Nelson, W. J., and Lazarides, E. (1985) J. Cell Biol. 100, 1726-1735[Abstract]
  28. Birkenmeier, C. S., Sharp, J. P., Field, H. A., and Barker, J. E. (1993) Blood 82, Suppl. 1, 5a
  29. Peters, L. L., Birkenmeier, C. S., Bronson, R. T., White, R. A., Lux, S. E., Otto, E., Bennett, V., Higgins, A., Barker, J. E. (1991) J. Cell Biol. 114, 1233-1241[Abstract]
  30. Peters, L. L., Turtzo, L. C., Birkenmeier, C. S., Barker, J. E. (1993) Blood 81, 2144-2149[Abstract]
  31. Moon, R. T., Ngai, J., Wold, B. J., Lazarides, E. (1985) J. Cell Biol. 100, 152-160[Abstract]
  32. Buckingham, M. E. (1985) Essays Biochem. 20, 77-109[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Rubenstein, P. A. (1990) Bioessays 12, 309-315[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Porter, G., Scher, M., Resneck, W., Porter, N., Fowler, V., and Bloch, R. (1997) Cell Motil. Cytolskeleton 37, 7-19[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Winkelmann, J. C., and Forget, B. G. (1993) Blood 81, 3173-3185[Abstract]
  36. Winkelmann, J. C., Costa, F. F., Linzie, B. L., Forget, B. G. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 20449-20454[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Winkelmann, J. C., Chang, J. G., Tse, W. T., Scarpa, A. L., Marchesi, V. T., Forget, B. G. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 11827-11832[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Zhou, D., Birkenmeier, C. S., Williams, M. W., Sharp, J. J., Barker, J. E., Bloch, R. J. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 136, 621-631[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Chomczynski, P., and Sacchi, N. (1987) Anal. Biochem. 162, 156-159[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Ng, S. Y., Gunning, P., Eddy, R., Ponte, P., Leavitt, J., Shows, T., and Kedes, L. (1985) Mol. Cell. Biol. 5, 2720-2732[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Edwards, J. B., Delort, J., and Mallet, J. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 5227-5232[Abstract]
  42. Frohman, M. A., Dush, M. K., and Martin, G. R. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 8998-9002[Abstract]
  43. Mason, P., Enver, T., Wilkinson, D., and Williams, J. (1993) in Gene Transcription: A Practical Approach (Hames, B., and Higgins, S., eds), pp. 47-54, IRL Press, Oxford
  44. Andrews, N. C., and Faller, D. V. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 2499[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Carthew, R. W., Chodosh, L. A., and Sharp, P. A. (1985) Cell 43, 439-448[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Strauss, F., and Varshavsky, A. (1984) Cell 37, 889-901[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Bennett, V. (1983) Methods Enzymol. 96, 313-324[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Kunimoto, M., Otto, E., and Bennett, V. (1991) J. Cell Biol. 115, 1319-1331[Abstract]
  49. Davis, J., and Bennett, V. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 7757-7766[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Genetics Computer Group (1994) Program Manual for the Wisconsin Package, Version 8.0, Madison, WI
  51. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., Lipman, D. J. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  52. Javahery, R., Khachi, A., Lo, K., Zenzie-Gregory, B., and Smale, S. T. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 116-127[Abstract]
  53. Kozak, M. (1986) Cell 44, 283-292[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  54. Horowitz, D. S., and Krainer, A. R. (1994) Trends Genet. 10, 100-106[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  55. Shapiro, M. B., and Senapathy, P. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 7155-7174[Abstract]
  56. Hartzog, G. A., and Myers, R. M. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 44-56[Abstract]
  57. Kadonaga, J., Jones, K., and Tjian, R. (1986) Trends Biochem. Sci. 11, 20-23[CrossRef]
  58. Lassar, A. B., Buskin, J. N., Lockshon, D., Davis, R. L., Apone, S., Hauschka, S. D., Weintraub, H. (1989) Cell 58, 823-831[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  59. Gallagher, P., Romana, M., Tse, W., Eber, X., Lux, S., and Forget, B. (1994) Blood 84, Suppl. 1, 361a
  60. Devarajan, P., Stabach, P. R., Mann, A. S., Ardito, T., Kashgarian, M., Morrow, J. S. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 133, 819-830[Abstract]
  61. Hoock, T., Peters, L., and Lux, S. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 136, 1059-1070[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Peters, L. L., John, K. M., Lu, F. M., Eicher, E. M., Higgins, A., Yialamas, M., Turtzo, L. C., Otsuka, A. J., Lux, S. E. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 130, 313-330[Abstract]
  63. Ahn, A. H., and Kunkel, L. M. (1993) Nat. Genet. 3, 283-291[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  64. Nabeshima, Y., Fujii-Kuriyama, Y., Muramatsu, M., and Ogata, K. (1984) Nature 308, 333-338[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  65. Periasamy, M., Strehler, E. E., Garfinkel, L. I., Gubits, R. M., Ruiz-Opazo, N., Nadal-Ginard, B. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 13595-13604[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Robert, B., Daubas, P., Akimenko, M. A., Cohen, A., Garner, I., Guenet, J. L., Buckingham, M. (1984) Cell 39, 129-140[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  67. Strehler, E. E., Periasamy, M., Strehler-Page, M. A., Nadal-Ginard, B. (1985) Mol. Cell. Biol. 5, 3168-3182[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  68. Donoghue, M. J., Alvarez, J. D., Merlie, J. P., Sanes, J. R. (1991) J. Cell Biol. 115, 423-434[Abstract]
  69. Spencer, S. E., Walker, F. O., and Moore, S. A. (1987) Neurology 37, 645-649[Abstract]
  70. Moiseyev, V. S., Korovina, E. A., Polotskaya, E. L., Poliyanskaya, I. S., Yazdovsky, V. V. (1987) Lancet 2, 853-854[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  71. Bushby, K. M., Cleghorn, N. J., Curtis, A., Haggerty, I. D., Nicholson, L. V., Johnson, M. A., Harris, J. B., Bhattacharya, S. S. (1991) Hum. Genet. 88, 195-199[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  72. Muntoni, F., Wilson, L., Marrosu, G., Marrosu, M. G., Cianchetti, C., Mestroni, L., Ganau, A., Dubowitz, V., Sewry, C. (1995) J. Clin. Invest. 96, 693-699[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  73. Muntoni, F., Melis, M. A., Ganau, A., and Dubowitz, V. (1995) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 56, 151-157[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  74. Muntoni, F., Cau, M., Ganau, A., Congiu, R., Arvedi, G., Mateddu, A., Marrosu, M. G., Cianchetti, C., Realdi, G., Cao, A., Melis, M. A. (1993) N. Engl. J. Med. 329, 921-925[Free Full Text]
  75. Laverriere, A. C., MacNeill, C., Mueller, C., Poelmann, R. E., Burch, J. B., Evans, T. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 23177-23184[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  76. Olson, E. N., and Srivastava, D. (1996) Science 272, 671-676[Abstract]
  77. Ip, H. S., Wilson, D. B., Heikinheimo, M., Tang, Z., Ting, C. N., Simon, M. C., Leiden, J. M., Parmacek, M. S. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 7517-7526[Abstract]
  78. Grepin, C., Dagnino, L., Robitaille, L., Haberstroh, L., Antakly, T., and Nemer, M. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 3115-3129[Abstract]
  79. McGrew, M. J., Bogdanova, N., Hasegawa, K., Hughes, S. H., Kitsis, R. N., Rosenthal, N. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 4524-4534[Abstract]
  80. Molkentin, J. D., Kalvakolanu, D. V., Markham, B. E. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 4947-4957[Abstract]
  81. Thuerauf, D. J., Hanford, D. S., and Glembotski, C. C. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 17772-17775[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  82. Yamagata, T., Nishida, J., Sakai, R., Tanaka, T., Honda, H., Hirano, N., Mano, H., Yazaki, Y., and Hirai, H. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 3830-3839[Abstract]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.