Patch Clamp Studies on Ion Pumps of the Cytoplasmic Membrane of Escherichia coli
FORMATION, PREPARATION, AND UTILIZATION OF GIANT VACUOLE-LIKE STRUCTURES CONSISTING OF EVERTED CYTOPLASMIC MEMBRANE*

Teruo KurodaDagger §, Naoyuki Okuda, Naoto Saitohparallel **, Tetsuo Hiyamaparallel , Yoko TerasakiDagger Dagger , Hideharu AnazawaDagger Dagger , Aiko Hirata, Tatsushi Mogi§§, Iwao Kusaka, Tomofusa TsuchiyaDagger , and Isamu Yabe¶¶

From the  Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, The University of Tokyo, Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0032, Japan, the Dagger  Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Tsushima, Okayama, 700, Japan, the parallel  Department of Biochemistry, Saitama University, Urawa, Saitama, 38, Japan, the Dagger Dagger  Tokyo Research Laboratories, Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co. Ltd., Asahi-machi Machida-shi, Tokyo, 194, Japan, and §§ the Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Formation of giant protoplasts from normal Escherichia coli cells resulted in the formation of giant vacuole-type structures (which we designate as provacuoles) in the protoplasts. Electron microscopic observation revealed that these provacuoles were surrounded by a single membrane. We detected inner (cytoplasmic) membrane proteins in the provacuolar membrane but not outer membrane proteins. Biochemical analyses revealed that the provacuoles consist of everted cytoplasmic membranes. We applied the patch clamp method to the giant provacuoles. We have succeeded in measuring current that represents inward movement of H+ because of respiration and to ATP hydrolysis by the FoF1-ATPase. Such current was inhibited by inhibitors of the respiratory chain or FoF1-ATPase. This method is applicable for analyses of ion channels, ion pumps, or ion transporters in E. coli or other microorganisms.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

The patch clamp technique is an excellent method to measure ion movement across cell membranes as current (1). An extremely small glass pipette (about 1 µm in diameter) is attached to the membranes, and activity of ion translocating proteins (ion channels, ion pumps, or ion transporters) is directly measured. So far, however, this important method has been mainly utilized for studies on animal or plant cells but scarcely for bacterial cells (2). Bacterial cells are usually too small to be measured by this method.

Escherichia coli, a Gram-negative bacterium, is the best characterized organism from both biochemical and genetical points of view. Ion pumps and ion transporters in E. coli are biochemically well characterized. Many mutant E. coli cells are available. Thus, genetical manipulations are very easy with this microorganism. Therefore, development of a patch clamp method applicable to E. coli membranes must be extremely valuable. Cells of E. coli are surrounded by an outer membrane and an inner membrane (cytoplasmic membrane) separated by a peptidoglycan layer and a periplasmic space. All of the major ion pumps and ion transporters such as the respiratory chain, FoF1-ATPase, various ion transporters, and ion-coupled solute transporters are located in the cytoplasmic membrane. To measure ion translocation via such ion pumps or transporters of the cytoplasmic membrane, we have to overcome the following three hurdles: 1) we have to prepare giant vesicles, the diameter of which must be at least 10 µm (this is important to get high success rate and accuracy of measurement), 2) the pipette must be directly accessible to the cytoplasmic membrane, and 3) the substrates or effectors of the ion pumps or transporters must be easily accessible to the active site of the proteins and easily removable from the system.

It would be essential to prepare giant protoplasts to overcome the first two hurdles. Many attempts have been made by many research groups to prepare giant bacterial cells or giant protoplasts. So far, however, no giant protoplasts surrounded by cytoplasmic membranes and suitable for patch clamp analysis have been prepared. Giant cells that were large enough for the patch clamp analysis have been prepared from cephalexin-induced filaments (3) or from an osmotic-sensitive mutant (4). However, such cells were not protoplasts surrounded only by the cytoplasmic membrane. Attempts have been made to prepare giant protoplasts from such giant cells (or spheroplasts) by osmotic shock or by treating them with lysozyme (5, 6). It is not clear whether the respiratory chain components and FoF1-ATPase (H+-translocating ATPase) are present in the membrane of such preparations, and therefore origin of the membrane is not clear. On the other hand, large protoplasts have been prepared from a penicillin-resistant mutant (7, 8). Those protoplasts were still too small to apply for the patch clamp method. Thus, these preparations were not suitable for the measurement of ion translocation via proteins of the cytoplasmic membrane by the patch clamp method. Recently we have succeeded in developing a unique method, named the spheroplast incubation method, for the preparation of extremely large giant protoplasts (10-30 µm in diameter). This method was derived from an early observation by Kusaka (9) that large protoplasts are formed after prolonged incubation of spheroplasts formed by treating cells of Bacillus megaterium with lysozyme in the presence of both penicillin G, an inhibitor of peptidoglycan synthesis, and an osmo-protectant. We have applied this method to many Gram-negative and -positive bacteria and succeeded in the formation of giant protoplasts from these types of cells. It is very difficult to overcome the third hurdle. The principal ion pumps in E. coli cells are the respiratory chain and the FoF1-ATPase. Ion movement through these ion pumps can be measured only with the whole cell recording mode of the patch clamp method because of their lower efficiency of ion transport compared with ion channels. Moreover, for the whole cell recording mode, it is not easy to perfuse a buffer inside a cell through a microelectrode pipette (10). A substrate of the respiratory chain, NADH, and a substrate of the FoF1-ATPase, ATP, are accessible only from the cytoplasmic side of the membrane. Thus, giant protoplasts with a right-side-out orientation are not suitable for measurement of H+ translocation because of the respiratory chain or the FoF1-ATPase. If we can prepare everted giant membrane vesicles, this hurdle will be overcome. Although several methods for the preparation of everted membrane vesicles from E. coli cells are available, the size of the vesicles is much smaller than the original cells (11, 12).

Formation of vacuole-like structures in E. coli cells has been reported from two groups. Lederberg and Clair reported that vacuole-like structures appeared in cells after incubation in the presence of penicillin G, which resulted in cell lysis (13). Buechner et al. observed vacuole-like structures in osmotic-sensitive mutant cells by ultra thin section electron microscopy (4). No ribosomes were observed in the vacuole-like structures. Both types of vacuole-like structures were about 3 µm. Unfortunately, further analysis of these vacuole-like structures has not been done. During the course of our studies on the giant protoplasts, we found that extremely large vacuole-type structures (10-20 µm in diameter) were formed in the giant protoplasts.

Here we report the preparation of the giant protoplasts and the giant vacuole-like structures (provacuoles) from E. coli cells. We investigated the properties of the giant provacuoles and measured H+ translocation via the respiratory chain (or by the FoF1-ATPase) using the patch clamp method by applying the whole cell recording mode. These methods could be applied for the direct measurement of ion translocation across the cytoplasmic membrane of E. coli and other bacteria.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Preparation of Giant Protoplasts from E. coli Cells-- Cells of E. coli K002 (Lpp-)1 or K003 (Lpp-, Delta uncB-C::Tn10) (14) were grown in a rich medium, beef heart infusion broth (Difco Co.) or LB broth, containing suitable antibiotics under aerobic conditions. The cells were harvested in the late exponential phase of growth and suspended in the same volume of SP buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, and 400 mM sucrose). Lysozyme (200 µg/ml) was added to the cell suspension, and the suspension was shaken at 30 °C for 10 min at 45 rpm. After this treatment, the cells were harvested and resuspended in the same volume of the GP medium consisting of 2.75% trypticase soy broth (without dextrose) (BBL Co.), 10 mM MgSO4, and 200 mM sucrose. A <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>400</DE></FR> volume of this suspension was diluted into the GP medium containing 0.7 units/ml of DNase I (TaKaRa Co.) and 800 µg/ml of penicillin G (potassium salt) (Banyu Pharmaceutical Co.) and shaken at 30 °C for 24 h at 30 rpm. Cells of strain K002 or K003 were made gigantic in this medium. However, for the preparation of the giant protoplasts from strain C600, the modified GP medium (50 mM KCl was added, and the sucrose concentration was 300 mM) was used. The C600 cells were shaken for 12 h (instead of 24 h) in the medium.

Construction of Plasmids-- Plasmids pMAL-pCm and pMAL-cCm were constructed by inserting the BsaAI fragment, which carried the chloramphenicol resistance gene into the unique ScaI site of pMAL-p2 and pMAL-c2 (New England Biolabs. Co.), respectively. pMAL-c2 is identical to pMAL-p2 (possessing malE-lacZalpha fused gene) except for deletion of the region for MalE (the structural gene for the maltose binding protein (MBP)) signal peptide. A plasmid pGFP (CLONTECH Co.) was doubly digested with EcoRI and HindIII, and the resulting fragment containing the gene for green fluorescence protein (GFP) was blunted and ligated to the XmnI site of the pMAL-pCm or the pMAL-cCm. The plasmids constructed were designated as pMAL-pCm-GFP and pMAL-cCm-GFP. Expression of malE gene carried on the plasmids is under the control of tac promoter, so that the protein was induced with IPTG.

Preparation of Provacuoles from Giant Protoplasts-- Giant protoplasts (induced with IPTG when necessary) were harvested by centrifugation at 1,600 × g. The pellet was suspended with Burst buffer consisting of 10 mM Tris HCl, pH 7.4, 10 mM MgCl2, 50 mM sucrose, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), and 17.5 units/ml of DNase I. The suspension was shaken at 30 °C for 20-30 min (45 rpm). After centrifugation at 1,600 × g, the pellet was resuspended in a small volume of Burst buffer containing 20% Percoll (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The suspension was placed in a centrifuge tube onto which an equal volume of Burst buffer was overlaid. Percoll density gradient centrifugation was carried out at 400 × g for 30 min. Provacuoles were found in the interfacial layer. The giant provacuoles were washed twice with the Burst buffer and used for further analyses. Membranes of the provacuoles and intraprovacuolar materials were separated as follows. The giant provacuoles were frozen rapidly in liquid N2 and thawed on ice. The provacuoles were completely disrupted by this procedure. After ultracentrifugation at 130,000 × g for 1 h, the pellet (membrane fraction) and the supernatant (intraprovacuolar materials) were recovered. The membrane fraction was washed with Burst buffer and resuspended in the same buffer. All centrifugations were carried out at 4 °C. The fractions (membranes and intravacuolar materials) were used for detection of MBP.

Microscopy and Electronmicroscopy-- For DAPI staining, the giant protoplasts were prepared from cells of E. coli K002. DAPI (final concentration, 1 µM) was added to the suspension of giant protoplasts and incubated at 30 °C for 2-3 h. When necessary, the giant provacuoles were isolated from the protoplasts. Fluorescent micrographs of the protoplasts and the provacuoles were taken with excitation at 350 nm and emission at 430-450 nm. For detection of GFP, the giant protoplasts were prepared from cells of E. coli C600/pMAL-pCm-GFP or C600/pMAL cCm-GFP. IPTG was added to the medium at 0.1 mM and incubated for 2-3 h. The fluorescent micrographs were taken by confocal laser scanning microscopy (TCS4D, Leica Co.) with excitation at 488 nm and emission at 530 nm. Electron micrographs were taken as described previously (15).

Preparation of Membrane Fractions-- Intact cells of E. coli K002 were harvested and suspended in a buffer consisting of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 5 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM PMSF. The cells were disrupted by sonication. After removal of unbroken cells by low speed centrifugation, the supernatants were centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 1 h at 4 °C. Membrane fractions were recovered in the pellet. The membrane fraction was washed with a buffer consisting of 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, and 2 mM EDTA. Membrane fraction from the giant protoplasts was prepared as follows. The giant protoplasts were collected by centrifugation and suspended in a buffer consisting of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM PMSF, and 280 units/ml of DNase I. The giant protoplasts were completely disrupted by sonication. Unbroken protoplasts were removed by low speed centrifugation. The supernatant was centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 1 h at 4 °C. The pellet was washed as described above. The membrane fractions were resuspended in a buffer consisting of 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, and 0.25% Sarcosyl and incubated at 20 °C for 20 min. Outer membrane proteins were not solubilized and could be obtained as pellets after centrifugation. The pellets were washed with a buffer consisting of 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, and 5 mM MgCl2 and resuspended in the same buffer.

Detection of MBP by Western Blotting-- The giant protoplasts were washed twice with a stabilizing buffer consisting of 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 10 mM MgCl2, 300 mM sucrose, 50 mM KCl, 0.5 mM PMSF, and 17.5 units/ml DNase I and resuspended in the same buffer. Giant provacuoles, the provacuolar membranes, and intraprovacuolar materials were prepared as described above. One-fourth volume of 50% tetrachloroacetic acid was added to the samples and mixed vigorously. After centrifugation at 8,500 × g, the pellets were washed first with acetone and thereafter with diethylether and suspended in a certain volume of the Burst buffer. These fractions were separated electrophoretically in a 12.5% polyacrylamide gel and transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane. Anti-MBP antiserum and purified MBP were purchased from NEB Co. For detection of the antigen-antibody complex, the ECL system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) was used.

Other Western Blot Analyses-- For detection of SecY, proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane after polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Anti-SecY antiserum and the ECL system were used to detect the SecY. Anti-SecY antiserum and purified SecY protein were generous gifts from Dr. H. Tokuda (University of Tokyo). For detection of cytochrome bo, bd, and F1-ATPase, the proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. Anti-bd antiserum was a generous gift from Dr. H. Matsuzawa (University of Tokyo). Anti-F1-ATPase antiserum was a generous gift from Dr. M. Futai (Institute of Scientific Industrial Research, Osaka University).

H+ Pumping Activity in Provacuoles-- Measurement of H+ pumping activity was carried out by the quinacrine fluorescence quenching method (16). Provacuoles (20 µg of protein) were added to 2 ml of the assay buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 2 mM MgCl2, 20 mM KCl, and 30 mM sucrose) containing 1 µM quinacrine hydrochloride. After preincubation for 5 min at 25 °C, NADH or ATP was added. After fluorescence quenching had occurred, KCN or DCCD was added as an inhibitor of the respiratory chain or FoF1-ATPase.

Electrical Recording in Provacuoles-- Giant protoplasts were harvested by centrifugation at 740 × g and gently suspended in a small volume of the same medium as that used for cell growth. The giant protoplasts were put on a glass chamber and washed with GPW buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 10 mM MgCl2, and 200 mM sucrose). The GPW buffer was replaced with the Burst buffer containing 210 units/ml of DNase I. After a few minutes, the giant provacuoles were washed again with Burst buffer. The chamber was filled carefully with Burst buffer. The patch pipettes (Drummond Scientific Co.) were pulled to a diameter with a resistance of 12.5-25 MOmega (when measured in Burst buffer) using a puller machine (model PC 10, Narishige) and then heat-polished (model MF-90, Narishige). The electrode was gently touched to a giant provacuole with a mild suction (about 200 mmH2O), producing an instantaneous seal of about 10 GOmega . Thereafter the suction was stopped. A tiny hole was made in the membrane of the giant vacuole with a ZAP pulse (duration time 3 ms, rising period 10 µs, amplitude 0.8 V). After that, the resistance was 0.5-1 GOmega . All substrates in the assay buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 2 mM MgCl2, 20 mM KCl, and 30 mM sucrose) were added through tandem six-way bulbs (GL Sciences Inc.). The Patch amplifier used was CEZ-2400 (NIHON KOHDEN). A positive current represents positive charges moving from exterior to interior of the provacuole. All recordings were made using the standard patch clamp technique at 23 °C (1).

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Vacuole-like Structures Surrounded by a Single Membrane-- An electron micrograph of a giant protoplast and a vacuole-like structure formed in the protoplast are shown in Fig. 1A. The diameter of the giant protoplast in the figure is about 13 µm and that of the vacuole-like structure is about 10 µm. The original E. coli cell (1 × 2 µm) is shown in Fig. 1B. The membranes of the giant protoplast (indicated by an arrowhead) and that of the giant vacuole-like structure (indicated by an arrow) are shown in Fig. 1C. Compared with membranes of the original cell shown in Fig. 1D, which consist of two membrane structures (two arrows indicating outer membrane and inner membrane, respectively), both of the membranes of the giant protoplast and the giant vacuole-like structure consist of single membrane (Fig. 1C). We took many electron micrographs of the giant protoplasts and the giant vacuole-like structures and obtained the same results. Thus, we conclude that both the giant protoplasts and the giant vacuole-like structures are surrounded by single membrane. It should be noted that most giant protoplasts contained several vacuole-like structures in one protoplast, as will be shown below. No ribosome-like structures are present inside the giant vacuole-like structures (Fig. 1, A and C). We stained the giant protoplasts and the giant vacuole-like structures with DAPI, which stacks between DNA double strands, and investigated whether DNA exists in the vacuole-like structures (Fig. 2). Our results clearly indicate that there is no detectable DNA in the vacuole-like structures (Fig. 2C). However, DNA is present in the cytoplasm of the giant cells (Fig. 2C). Because the vacuole-like structures do not contain ribosomes, DNA, and any other electron-dense materials, we henceforth refer to the vacuole-like structures as "provacuoles."


View larger version (169K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Electron micrographs of giant protoplast and intact cells of E. coli K002. A, a giant protoplast with a giant vacuole-like structure. B, an intact cell. C, magnification in rectangular frame of A. D, magnification in rectangular frame of B. Scale bars indicate 1 µm (in A and B) or 100 nm (in D). The magnification in C is same as that in D.


View larger version (178K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   DIC images and fluorescence micrographs of giant protoplasts and giant provacuoles. A, DIC image of giant protoplasts of E. coli K002. B, DIC image of giant provacuoles derived from E. coli K002. C, fluorescence image of the giant protoplasts shown in A stained with DAPI. D, fluorescence image of the giant provacuoles shown in B stained with DAPI. DAPI (final concentration, 1 µM) was added to suspension of giant protoplasts or provacuoles and incubated at 30 °C for 2-3 h.

Microscopic observations revealed that the giant protoplasts are not very stable. Larger giant protoplasts were more unstable compared with smaller ones. We sometimes observed that larger giant protoplasts lysed during the microscopic observations, and provacuoles were released to the medium. Unlike the instability observed for the giant protoplasts, the provacuoles were stable. Thus, it seemed possible that the provacuoles could be isolated.

Membranes of the Provacuoles-- The giant protoplasts were lysed by osmotic shock (lowering the osmolarity). The provacuoles were then separated by Percoll density gradient centrifugation. A differential interference contrast (DIC) micrograph of the isolated giant provacuoles is shown in Fig. 2B. Size of the giant provacuoles ranged from 2 to 15 µm. The provacuoles could not be stained with DAPI (Fig. 2D), indicating that DNA was not present in the provacuoles. In any case, we succeeded in isolating the provacuoles.

We analyzed membrane proteins of the provacuoles to determine whether the provacuole membrane is derived from the cytoplasmic membrane, the outer membrane, or both. As shown in Fig. 3, although major outer membrane proteins OmpC/F and OmpA were detected in the Sarcosyl-insoluble fraction of whole membranes of intact cells (Fig. 3, lane 3), they were not detected in the Sarcosyl-insoluble fraction of the whole provacuolar membranes (Fig. 3, lane 6). Almost all of the membrane proteins of the provacuoles were solubilized by Sarcosyl. Absolutely no protein band was detected in the Sarcosyl-insoluble fraction from the isolated provacuoles (data not shown). It has been reported that most cytoplasmic membrane proteins, but not outer membrane proteins, were solubilized by Sarcosyl (17). Thus, we believe that the membrane of the provacuoles was from cytoplasmic membrane. Some difference in the membrane protein patterns was observed between the cytoplasmic membrane of intact cells, giant protoplasts, and provacuoles. This suggests that membrane of the vacuoles is very similar but not completely identical with the cytoplasmic membrane.


View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   SDS-polyacrylamide gel analysis of membrane proteins of E. coli cells, giant protoplasts, and giant provacuoles. Lanes 1-3, intact cells of E. coli K002; lanes 4-6, giant protoplasts of K002; lane 7, provacuoles isolated from K002. Lanes 1, 4, and 7, total membrane proteins; lanes 2 and 5, fractions solubilized with Sarcosyl; lanes 3 and 6, Sarcosyl-insoluble fractions. Proteins were separated by gel electrophoresis with 12.5% acrylamide gel and stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. 30 µg of protein membrane samples were loaded to lanes 1, 4, and 7, and materials derived from 30 µg of protein membrane were loaded to lanes 2, 3, 5, and 6.

We tested whether some of the major membrane transport systems, such as the Sec protein secretion machinery, the respiratory chain, and the FoF1-ATPase, exist in the membranes of the provacuoles by immunoblot analysis (Western blotting). SecY is a major component of the Sec complex (18, 19). We detected two protein bands that reacted with anti-SecY antibody in both the protoplasts and the provacuolar membranes (Fig. 4A, lanes 1 and 2). The band corresponding to the SecY in the protoplasts was very faint, suggesting that the relative amount of the SecY in the protoplasts is small compared with total proteins in the protoplasts. On the other hand, the SecY was clearly detected in the provacuolar membranes, suggesting that the relative amount of SecY compared with other membrane proteins in the provacuolar membranes is enough. The band with lower molecular weight shown in the figure (Fig. 4A, lanes 1 and 2) is a nonspecific one. The alpha  and beta  subunits of the FoF1-ATPase complex, the major subunits of the complex, were present in the provacuolar membranes prepared from E. coli strain K002, a wild type cell with respect to the FoF1-ATPase (Fig. 4B, lane 1). On the other hand, only faint bands corresponding to the alpha  and beta subunits were detected with the provacuolar membranes from strain K003, an FoF1-ATPase negative mutant (Fig. 4B, lane 2). We detected both subunit 1 of the cytochrome bd complex (Fig. 4C) and subunit 1 of the cytochrome bo complex (Fig. 4D) from the terminal oxidase of the respiratory chain in the provacuolar membranes. The amount of the bd and the bo in E. coli cells is greatly affected by the growth phases (20). The bo complex is prominent at the early exponential phase of growth. The bd complex is prominent at late exponential phase. Under the growth conditions in our experiments, the bd was the major terminal oxidase. The amount of bd in the provacuolar membranes was roughly 10 times larger than that of bo in K002. We also checked the amount of bd and bo in the provacuolar membranes from K003, a FoF1-ATPase negative mutant. Again, bd was present in the provacuolar membranes in larger amounts than bo. However, the amount of bo was larger than that in the provacuolar membranes of K002 (Fig. 4D). Thus, all of the major transporters in the cytoplasmic membranes tested were present in the provacuolar membranes. Therefore, we conclude that the provacuolar membranes are very similar to the cytoplasmic membranes of intact cells.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Western blot analyses of some membrane proteins. A, SecY was detected with anti-SecY antiserum. Lane 1, giant protoplasts (C600/pMAL-pCm) (20 µg); lane 2, provacuolar membrane (20 µg); lane 3, purified SecY(0.2 µg). B, alpha  and beta  subunits of F1-ATPase were detected with anti-F1 antiserum. Lane 1, provacuoles (30 µg) from K002; lane 2, provacuoles (30 µg) from K003. C, subunit 1 of cytochrome bd was detected with anti-bd antiserum. Lane 1, provacuoles (20 µg of protein) from K002: lane 2, provacuoles (20 µg of protein) from K003; lane 3, purified bd complex (1.6 pmol). D, subunit 1 of cytochrome bo was detected with anti-bo antiserum. Lane 1, provacuoles (20 µg of protein) from K002; lane 2, provacuoles (20 µg of protein) from K003; lane 3, purified bd complex (0.15 pmol).

Orientation of the Provacuolar Membranes-- We tested the activity and direction of protein transport via the Sec system in the provacuolar membranes. MBP is a component of the maltose transport system and is located in the periplasmic space of intact E. coli cells. This protein is synthesized by ribosomes in the cytoplasm and excreted to the periplasm through the Sec secretion machinery. A signal peptide at the NH2 terminus of MBP is necessary for the secretion to occur. We constructed a plasmid encoding a fusion protein between MBP and GFP. The GFP portion was attached to the COOH terminus of the MBP. Thus, location of the fused MBP in the cells could easily be detected because of the green fluorescence emitted by GFP. We constructed two types of plasmids that should produce two types of fusion proteins, one possessing no signal peptide (pMAL-cCm-GFP) and the other possessing the signal peptide(pMAL-pCm-GFP). The fusion protein with no signal peptide was detected in the cytoplasm of the giant protoplasts (Fig. 5, A and C). MBP could not be excreted from the cytoplasm without the signal. When the signal peptide is present, the fused MBP was detected mainly inside the provacuoles of the giant protoplasts (Fig. 5, B and D). Faint fluorescent signals were detected in the cytoplasm. This means that the Sec system is functional in the membranes of the provacuoles and that the direction of the secretion (protein transport) is from cytoplasm to the interior of the provacuoles. This indicates that the provacuolar membranes have an everted orientation compared with the cytoplasmic membranes.


View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   DIC images and fluorescence micrographs of giant protoplasts. Giant protoplasts were incubated with 0.1 mM IPTG for 2 to 5 h to induce MBP-GFP fusion protein. A and B are DIC images. C and D are fluorescence images of GFP tag. A and C are giant protoplasts of C600/pMAL-cCm-GFP (MBP-GFP fusion without signal peptide for MBP). B and D are giant protoplasts of C600/pMAL-pCm-GFP (MBP-GFP fusion with native signal peptide).

We then tested whether the MBP in the provacuoles is in the mature (processed) form or immature (unprocessed) form by immunoblot analysis. We used a plasmid pMAL-pCm encoding a fusion protein MBP-LacZalpha (alpha  fragment of beta -galactosidase). Expression of the fusion protein from the plasmid gene is under tac promoter. No protein of the giant protoplasts from uninduced cells reacted with antibody against the MBP (Fig. 6, lane 1). Contrary to what was expected, we detected four protein bands that reacted with the antibody in the giant protoplasts prepared from cells induced with IPTG (a gratuitous inducer of the tac promoter) (Fig. 6, lane 2). Among the four, the first two protein bands (top of the gel) corresponded to proteins that reacted with antiserum against LacZalpha (data not shown). The fourth protein band (the lowest molecular weight) corresponded to the mature MBP (Fig. 6, lane 8). Two dense protein bands (the second and the fourth) were observed in culture medium of the giant protoplasts (Fig. 6, lane 3). Thus, we believe that the first and second bands (in lane 2) correspond to premature and mature MBP-LacZalpha , respectively. On the other hand, we believe the third and the fourth bands (in lane 2) correspond to premature and mature MBP, respectively, both of which were derived from the fusion protein. Mature MBP-LacZalpha and mature MBP are present in the culture medium. Mature MBP is present in the provacuoles. The absence of mature MBP-LacZalpha in the provacuoles suggests that the LacZalpha portion of the fusion protein was cleaved by some unidentified protease. In any case, it is clear that protein-processing secretion machinery is present in the provacuolar membranes.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Western blot analysis of MBP. All samples were prepared from C600/pMAL-pCm giant protoplasts after IPTG (0.1 mM) induction for 3 h except for lane 1. Anti-MBP antiserum was used to detect the protein bands. Lane 1, uninduced giant protoplasts; lane 2, induced giant protoplasts; lane 3, medium after removal of giant protoplasts; lane 4, provacuoles; lane 5, supernatant after burst of the giant protoplasts; lane 6, provacuolar membranes; lane 7, intraprovacuolar materials; lane 8, purified MBP. Proteins applied were 10 µg for lanes 1-7 and 1 µg for lane 8.

We confirmed that the provacuoles are everted (orientation is inside-out compared with the cytoplasmic membranes) by measuring direction of H+ transport because of respiration or ATP hydrolysis by the FoF1-ATPase in the isolated provacuoles. We observed quinacrine fluorescence quenching because of respiration (Fig. 7A) or ATP hydrolysis (Fig. 7C), which represents inward H+ transport with the provacuoles prepared from the wild type strain (K002). The NADH-driven H+ movement and the ATP-driven H+ movement were inhibited by KCN, an inhibitor of the respiratory chain, and DCCD, an inhibitor of the FoF1-ATPase, respectively. The fluorescence quenching because of respiration was stronger with the provacuoles prepared from an FoF1-ATPase negative mutant K003 than the quenching with provacuoles from wild type K002 (Fig. 7B). The quenching was not detected with the provacuoles from K003 when ATP was added (Fig. 7D). These results support the idea that the provacuoles are everted. No detectable fluorescence quenching caused by addition of NADH or ATP was observed with the giant protoplasts (data not shown).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   H+ pumping activities of provacuoles. Activity of H+ pumping in provacuoles was measured by the quinacrine fluorescence quenching method. Either 0.25 mM NADH (for respiration) or 1 mM ATP (potassium salt) (for FoF1-ATPase) was added to initiate H+ transport. KCN (2 mM) or DCCD (30 µM) was added as an inhibitor of the respiratory chain or of the FoF1-ATPase, respectively. A and C, provacuoles from K002; B and D, provacuoles from K003.

Patch Clamp Measurement of Current Because of Respiratory Chain or FoF1-ATPase-- We were able to obtain giant provacuoles possessing activities of the respiratory chain and the FoF1-ATPase. Substrates for the respiratory chain, NADH, and for the FoF1-ATPase, ATP, are accessible to the enzymes responsible for the reactions from exterior of the provacuoles. Thus, it seemed possible to measure current because of H+ transport by the respiratory chain and FoF1-ATPase in the provacuoles by the whole cell recording mode of the patch clamp method. In fact, we detected an inward current larger than 10 pA when NADH (0.25 mM) was added to the assay mixture (Fig. 8A). This current disappeared after NADH was removed from the system. Also we detected a similar current when ATP (1 mM) was introduced; the current disappeared after ATP was removed (Fig. 8B). The ATP-induced current was sensitive to an FoF1-ATPase inhibitor DCCD (30 µM) (Fig. 8C). On the other hand, the NADH-induced current was not sensitive to DCCD (Fig. 8D) but was sensitive to KCN (10 mM) (Fig. 8E). Thus, we have succeeded in measuring current because of H+ transport via the respiratory chain or the FoF1-ATPase in isolated provacuoles of E. coli. These experiments were repeated several times, and very similar results were obtained.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Electrical recording in a provacuole. Electrical recordings with whole cell recording mode under membrane potential = 0 were carried out with the same provacuole continuously (five measurements, A-E). Substrate (NADH or ATP) and inhibitor (KCN) were present in the assay mixture at the indicated concentrations for durations indicated by arrows. The plus currents indicate inward provacuole currents. In C, provacuoles were preincubated with 30 µM DCCD for 10 min. Then ATP was introduced into the assay system. In E, NADH and KCN were introduced into the assay mixture simultaneously and removed simultaneously.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Two methods are available for direct measurement of current because of ion transport across membranes: the planar lipid bilayer method and the patch clamp method. The former measures current because of an ion-transporting protein in reconstituted lipid bilayers. Purified protein, partially purified protein, or membrane fragments could be used for this method. If purified protein is available, this method is very valuable for measurement of ion transport and characterization of the protein. Hirata et al. (21) and Muneyuki et al. (22) measured an ATP-induced current from FoF1 ATPase in reconstituted lipid bilayers, estimated the H+/ATP stoichiometry, and analyzed the basic process of the reaction. However, problems exist in this method with the efficiency of protein incorporation into lipid bilayers and with the orientation of the proteins. The patch clamp method, on the other hand, requires neither purified protein nor reconstitution. Only one cell or membrane vesicle that is large enough for microelectrode pipette is necessary. This method is especially powerful because the function of the target ion transporting system is measurable in native membranes. It is inherently difficult to analyze the function of multicomponent systems that cannot easily be purified as whole complexes, such as the respiratory chain, using the planar lipid bilayer method (23, 24). However, the patch clamp method could be applicable even for these complicated systems. Because so many bacterial mutants are available, the patch clamp method could be extremely useful for the analyses of ion transport systems of bacterial cells. The only problem with using bacteria for application of the patch clamp method is their small size. We have developed methods to prepare giant protoplasts that contain giant provacuoles from E. coli cells and to isolate the provacuoles from the protoplasts. The provacuoles proved to be very useful for patch clamp analysis. We have succeeded in measuring H+ transport via the respiratory chain and the FoF1-ATPase of E. coli as an electric current using the provacuoles.

It seems that this method is applicable to the analyses of many other ion transport systems of E. coli such as ion transporters or ion-coupled solute transporters and of other bacteria. Kusaka found that giant protoplasts appeared when spheroplasts of B. megaterium were incubated in the presence of an inhibitor of peptidoglycan synthesis and that contents of DNA and RNA in the protoplasts enormously increased (9). A similar phenomenon was observed with E. coli. DNA of control E. coli cells and of giant protoplasts was stained with DAPI. Intensity of the DAPI fluorescence in the giant protoplasts was similar to that in the control cells (data not shown), indicating that much more DNA is present in a giant protoplast compared with a control cell. Synthesis of most of the cellular constituents including DNA, RNA, membrane proteins, and membrane lipids (except cell wall components) is intact in the enlarged protoplasts. These results support the idea that the ceasing of peptidoglycan synthesis interferes with concomitant occurrence between DNA replication and cell division. It seemed likely that giant protoplasts from many bacteria could be formed by similar methods as described in this paper. In fact, we have prepared giant protoplasts and giant provacuoles from several other bacteria. Measurements of ion transport in such giant provacuoles from several bacterial sources are now in progress.

What is (are) the role(s) of the giant provacuoles? In giant cells or protoplasts, if additional membranes are not present, the cells or protoplasts will suffer from shortage of energy or materials produced by membranes, because the ratio of membrane to cell volume becomes very small. During enlargement of the protoplasts, additional membrane structures, provacuoles, were formed. The larger the protoplasts, the more numerous and the larger the provacuoles appeared. Membranes of the provacuoles showed the ability to transduce energy. Activity of H+ transport in the provacuoles was fairly high. The estimated turn over rate of H+ transport via the FoF1-ATPase in the provacuolar membranes was about 600/s, calculating from the current (0.1 pA/µm2) and the amount of enzyme (25). This value is comparable with that (480/s) of ATP hydrolysis by F1-ATPase (26). Based on the fact that an active respiratory chain and FoF1-ATPase exist in the provacuolar membrane, we believe that oxidative phosphorylation takes place in the provacuolar membranes. We observed an increase in the amount of cytochrome bo, which possesses vectorial H+ pump activity (27) in provacuoles from mutant K003 (FoF1-ATPase negative) compared with those from the wild type K002 (Fig. 4). It looks as if the absence of the FoF1-ATPase is compensated for by the increase in the cytochrome bo.

Because the provacuolar membranes have an everted orientation, the interior of the provacuoles corresponds to the periplasmic space of intact cells. There are many proteins in the periplasmic space including binding proteins for solute transport, endoproteases such as DegP (28) and Tsp (29) that hydrolyze proteins damaged by heat shock and so on, and exoprotease, which cleaves degraded peptides to amino acids (30). The amino acids thus produced will be transported to the cytoplasm. Our results suggest the presence of peptidase in the provacuoles (Fig. 6). Vacuoles of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are organelles that have the ability to degrade and recycle unnecessary macromolecular constituents (31, 32). For example, addition of glucose to a yeast culture growing on acetate as a carbon source results in rapid inactivation of gluconeogenic enzymes followed by proteolytic degradation of the inactivated enzymes. The degradation of fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase, a gluconeogenic enzyme, depends on PrA, which is an endoprotease found in vacuoles (33). It is known that vacuoles possess two endoproteases, PrA and PrB, and five exoproteases, ApY, ApI CpY, CpI, and DAPB-B (32).

The peptidoglycan layer and the outer membrane are present outside of the periplasm in cells. No such structure is present inside of the provacuolar membranes. It is not yet clear whether peptidoglycan is synthesized in the vacuoles in the presence of penicillin, which is necessary for the formation of the giant protoplasts under our conditions, or because of some other unknown reasons. Also it is not clear whether the membrane corresponding to the outer membrane is constructed in the provacuoles because of the absence of the peptidoglycan or for some other unknown reasons. The absence of both the peptidoglycan layer and the outer membrane-like membranes in the provacuoles makes the provacuoles an ideal source of cytoplasmic membranes with an everted orientation.

The provacuoles could be regarded as a reservoir for membrane constituents. Too many cellular constituents will be synthesized in the giant protoplasts. Perhaps the rate of membrane lipid synthesis and the rate of membrane protein synthesis are well balanced in the protoplasts. Unbalanced overproduction of membrane proteins would result in formation of inclusion bodies. It is likely that concomitant overproduction of both membrane lipids and membrane proteins results in the formation of intracellular membrane structures such as provacuoles.

The provacuoles may be a sort of super organelle that is formed under certain conditions unfavorable for cells. The fact that even prokaryotic cells have the potential ability to form vacuoles may provide a clue to the origin of vacuoles in eukaryotes such as S. cerevisiae (34, 35).

E. coli is the best characterized microorganism. Many ion transport systems are known in E. coli. Extensive biochemical and genetical analyses of such systems, including gene cloning and sequencing have been done. However, electrophysiological analysis has never been done with E. coli cells except for the investigation on the mechanochemical channel by Kung and co-workers (2). The methods described in this paper have opened a new field of electrophysiology in E. coli cells. Although we mainly used an E. coli mutant K002 that lacks Lpp for the preparation of giant protoplasts and vacuoles, C600 cells, a wild type strain with respect to the Lpp, were also successfully used as shown in this paper. Removal of the outer membranes from the giant protoplasts was easier in the Lpp- mutant cells than in the wild type cells (36, 37).2 However, we confirmed many times that even wild type E. coli cells including cells of strain Q13 (38), the parent of K002 possessing normal Lpp, were also suitable for the preparation of the giant protoplasts and the giant provacuoles. This means that many E. coli mutants isolated or constructed in the world could be used for the preparation of the giant provacuoles and could be used for electrophysiological studies.

It is possible to enlarge cells harboring plasmid carrying gene(s) of interest and a gene for drug resistance (except the gene for beta -lactamase) by our method. Transformant cells harboring a plasmid sometime lose the plasmid during the growth. The gene product(s) of interest is(are) not present in such cells. If the gene(s) of interest is(are) on the plasmid, it is crucial for patch clamp analysis that giant protoplast or giant provacuole attached to the microelectrode pipette is derived from a cell carrying the plasmid. Addition of a pertinent drug to the medium for giant protoplast preparation can solve this problem.

Induction of gene expression is possible with the giant protoplasts as with the intact E. coli cells. It is often important to overproduce the ion transport protein of interest to measure currents using the patch clamp method, especially when the turnover number of ion transporter is not high enough. Induction of the gene as well as the use of high copy plasmid is valuable for overproduction of proteins. We detected fluorescence because of the MAL-GFP gene product 3-5 h after induction by IPTG with giant protoplasts of C600/pMAL-cCm-GFP. The gene for the fusion protein between MBP and GFP is located downstream from the tac promoter in this plasmid.

Thus, our methods for the preparation of giant protoplasts or giant provacuoles can be applied to wild type cells, mutant cell, and plasmid-harboring cells of E. coli. On the other hand, it is easy to construct a gene-disrupted mutant of E. coli. Many genes encoding ion transport proteins have been cloned and sequenced. It is easy to construct site-directed mutants in the genes. Wild type or mutant genes on plasmids can be easily introduced into the gene-disrupted cells. Thus, structure-function relationship could be investigated by the patch clamp method with the provacuoles derived from cells harboring mutant-type gene. These methods are also applicable to some, perhaps many, other bacteria.

Furthermore, it is possible to inject the giant protoplasts or giant provacuoles with effectors such as inhibitors, stimulators, modifiers, or even antibodies. We can observe their effects directly. Of course, we can inject plasmid DNA into the giant protoplasts. Thus, it is possible to use the giant protoplasts or giant provacuoles as biologically active test tubes or to use E. coli as a living test tube. Biochemically and genetically, E. coli is the best characterized organism. The DNA sequence of the whole genome of this organism has been determined. We believe that the development and establishment of the methods described in this paper are invaluable for studies on ion transport systems and ion channels in E. coli and other bacteria. New ion channels may be discovered in bacterial cells.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. S. Makino, H. Matsuzawa, H. Tokuda, and K. Nishiyama of the University of Tokyo and Dr. M. Futai of Osaka University for purified proteins, antibodies, and helpful discussions. We also thank the late Dr. S. Mizushima and Dr. Y. Anraku of the University of Tokyo for stimulating discussions. We thank Dr. Manuel F. Varela of Eastern New Mexico University for critically reading the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Research Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

** Present address: Dept. Pharmacology., Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113, Japan.

¶¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-3-3812-2111 (Ext. 7860); Fax: 81-3-3812-0192; E-mail: yabe{at}bio.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

1 The abbreviation used are: Lpp, lipoprotein; MBP, maltose-binding protein; GFP, green fluorescence protein; IPTG, isopropyl-beta -D-thiogalactopyranoside; PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; DAPI, 4'-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride; DCCD, dicyclohexyl carobodiimide; DIC, differential interference contrast.

2 S. Mizushima, personal communication.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Hamil, O. P., Mary, A., Neher, E., Sakmann, B., and Sigworth, F. J. (1981) Pflügers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 391, 85-100[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Sukharev, S. I., Blount, P., Martinac, B., and Kung, C. (1997) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 59, 633-657[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Ruthe, H.-J., and Adler, J. (1985) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 819, 105-113[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Buechner, M., Delcour, A. H., Martinac, B., Adler, J., and Kung, C. (1990) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1024, 111-121[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Cui, C., Smith, D. O., and Adler, J. (1995) J. Membr. Biol. 144, 31-42[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Kubalski, A. (1995) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1238, 177-182[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Eda, T., Kanda, Y., and Kimura, S. (1978) J. Bacteriol. 127, 1564-1567
  8. Onoda, T., Oshima, A., Nakano, S., and Matsuno, A. (1987) J. Gen. Microbiol. 133, 527-534[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Kusaka, I. (1967) J. Bacteriol. 96, 884-888
  10. Matsuda, H., and Noma, A. (1984) J. Physiol. 357, 553-573[Abstract]
  11. Rosen, B. P., and Tsuchiya, T. (1979) Methods Enzymol. 56, 233-241[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Yamada, H., Tokuda, H., and Mizushima, S. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 1723-1728[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Lederberg, J., and Clair, J. S. (1957) J. Bacteriol. 75, 143-160
  14. Yamane, K., Ichihara, S., and Mizushima, S. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 2358-2362[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Tsuruoka, T., Ito, M., Tomioka, S., Hirata, A., and Matsuhashi, M. (1988) J. Bacteriol. 170, 5229-5235[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Kuroda, T., Shimamoto, T., Inaba, K., Tsuda, M., and Tsuchiya, T. (1994) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 116, 1030-1038[Abstract]
  17. Filip, C., Fletcher, G., Wulff, J. L., and Earhart, C. F. (1973) J. Bacteriol. 115, 717-722[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Brundage, E., Hendrick, J. P., Schiebel, E., Driessen, A. J. M., and Wickner, W. (1990) Cell 62, 649-657[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Akimaru, J., Matsuyama, S., Tokuda, H., and Mizushima, S. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 6546-6549
  20. Minagawa, J., Nakamura, H., Yamato, I., Mogi, T., and Anraku, Y. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 11198-11203[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Hirata, H., Ohno, K., Sone, N., Kagawa, Y., and Hamamoto, T. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 9839-9843[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Muneyuki, E., Kagawa, Y., and Hirata, H. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 6092-6096[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Ingledew, W. J., and Poole, R. K. (1984) Microbiol. Rev. 48, 222-271
  24. Unden, G., and Bongaets, J. (1997) Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1320, 217-234[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Ishii, N., Yoshimura, H., Nagayama, K., Kagawa, Y., and Yoshida, M. (1993) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 113, 245-250[Abstract]
  26. Kato, Y., Sasayama, T., Muneyuki, E., and Yoshida, M. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1231, 275-281[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Puustein, A., Finel, M., Haltia, T., Gennis, R. B., and Wikstrom, M. (1989) FEBS Lett. 249, 163-167[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Kolmar, H., Waller, P. R. H., and Sauer, R. T. (1996) J. Bacteriol. 178, 5925-5929[Abstract]
  29. Keiler, K. C., Waller, P. R. H., and Sauer, R. T. (1996) Science 271, 990-993[Abstract]
  30. Gibson, S. A. W., and Macfarlane, G. T. (1988) J. Gen. Microbiol. 134, 2231-2240[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Klionsky, D. J., Herman, P. K., and Emr, S. D. (1990) Microbiol. Rev. 54, 266-292
  32. van den Hazel, H. B, Kielland-Brandt, M. C., and Winther, J. R. (1996) Yeast 12, 1-16[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Chiang, H. L., and Scheckman, R. (1991) Nature 350, 313-318[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Gogarten, J. P., Kibak, H., Dittrich, P., Taiz, L., Bowman, E. J., Bowman, B. J., Manolson, M. F., Poole, R. J., Date, T., Oshima, T., Konishi, J., and Yoshida, M. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 6661-6665[Abstract]
  35. Nelson, N. (1992) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1100, 109-124[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Braun, V., and Bosch, V. (1972) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 69, 970-974[Abstract]
  37. Suzuki, H., Nishimura, Y., Yasuda, S., Nishimura, A., Yamada, M., and Hirota, Y. (1978) Mol. Gen. Genet. 167, 1-9[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Reiner, A. M. (1969) J. Bacteriol. 97, 1431-1436[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.