N-Shc and Sck, Two Neuronally Expressed Shc Adapter Homologs
THEIR DIFFERENTIAL REGIONAL EXPRESSION IN THE BRAIN AND ROLES IN NEUROTROPHIN AND Src SIGNALING*

Takeshi NakamuraDagger §, Sumie Muraoka, Reiko SanokawaDagger , and Nozomu Mori§par **

From the Dagger  Biomedical Research and Development Department, Sumitomo Electric Industries, Sakae-ku, Yokohama 244, the  Inheritance and Variation Group, PRESTO, Science and Technology Corporation of Japan, Keihanna Plaza, Seika-cho, Kyoto 619-02, and the par  Program of Protecting Brain, CREST, Science and Technology Corporation of Japan and the ** Department of Molecular Genetic Research, National Institute for Longevity Science, Oobu, Aichi 474, Japan

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

The Shc adapter protein is ubiquitously expressed and has been implicated in phosphotyrosine signalings following a variety of extracellular stimulation, e.g. growth factor stimulation, Ca2+ elevation, and G-protein-coupled receptor stimulation. In neuronal cells such as PC12, Shc was demonstrated to be involved in vitro in Ras-dependent mitogen-activated protein kinase activation following nerve growth factor stimulation and Ca2+ entry. However, Shc mRNA was hardly detectable in the brain, and therefore, Shc is unlikely to participate in phosphotyrosine signaling in the central nervous system. Two recently isolated Shc homologs, N-Shc and Sck, have been shown to be expressed in the brain and are expected to function as neuronal adapters instead of Shc. In this study, the neuronal distribution and function of these novel Shc members were investigated. In human and rat central nervous systems, the expression profiles of N-Shc and Sck mRNAs considerably overlapped, although some distinct localization between them was observed: in the adult rat brain, the level of N-Shc mRNA was the highest in the thalamus, whereas that of Sck mRNA was the highest in the hippocampus. In the peripheral nervous system, transcripts of Shc and Sck, but not of N-Shc, were detected. Immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated functional differences between N-Shc and Sck: (i) N-Shc was a higher affinity adapter molecule than Sck in nerve growth factor and brain-derived neurotrophic factor signaling; and (ii) N-Shc, but not Sck, was efficiently phosphorylated by activated Src tyrosine kinase, whereas Sck, but not N-Shc, formed a complex with pp135, a protein highly phosphorylated by v-Src. These results suggest that neurally expressed N-Shc and Sck may have distinct roles in neuronal signaling in the brain.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

The Shc adapter protein has been implicated in various growth factor and cytokine receptor signalings by virtue of its association with phosphotyrosine residues of the activated receptors (1, 2). Shc has two modules of phosphotyrosine recognition with different specificities, an N-terminal phosphotyrosine-binding domain (PTB domain)1 and a C-terminal SH2 domain (3). Shc can thereby associate with a wide variety of tyrosine kinase receptors, which phosphorylate Shc at its tyrosine residues. In addition, Shc can be phosphorylated by cytoplasmic tyrosine kinases such as Src family kinases and PYK2 kinase that mediate signaling following Ca2+ elevation and G-protein-coupled receptor stimulation (4-6). Phosphorylated Shc subsequently associates with another adapter protein, Grb2, through direct binding of the Grb2 SH2 domain to Tyr-317 or Tyr-239 on Shc (7-10). Grb2 is, in turn, associated with mammalian SOS, a Ras guanine nucleotide exchange factor. Shc phosphorylation therefore induces the formation of a complex containing Shc, Grb2, and SOS, which may activate the Ras pathway (2). In neuronal cell lines such as PC12, Shc has been shown to play a pivotal role in Ras-dependent MAP kinase activation following Trk receptor stimulation with nerve growth factor (NGF) (11, 12). However, the level of Shc mRNA was found to be remarkably low in brain tissues. Recently, two Shc homologs (N-Shc/ShcC/Rai and Sck/ShcB/Sli) were isolated and shown to be expressed in the brain, and they were proposed to exert neuronal adapter functions instead of Shc (13-16).

The importance of phosphotyrosine signaling in the development and maintenance of the nervous system is widely accepted (17, 18), whereas the neuronal distribution of Shc family members has been largely unknown. Previously, we showed that N-Shc expression was brain-specific; its mRNA was detected throughout the central nervous system of the rat embryo (16). N-Shc expression in the human adult brain exhibited regional differences, and the highest levels were found in the cortex and hippocampus (16). In this study, we obtained Sck cDNA and compared its expression with that of Shc and N-Shc in neural tissues. Shc was not expressed in the brain, and some distinct localization between N-Shc and Sck was observed in the central nervous system. In contrast, only Shc and Sck mRNAs were detected in the peripheral nervous system; thus, Sck was expressed in both central and peripheral neurons, and N-Shc was confirmed to be a central nervous system-specific member of the Shc family.

In light of the distinct expression profiles of N-Shc and Sck in the brain and other neural tissues, questions arise about the possibility of their functional divergence. Shc (and other Shc members) has been implicated to provide a convergence point for neuronal signaling pathways (19); signalings through Shc family members are not simply linear, but may branch and overlap extensively. If N-Shc and Sck have different abilities as adapter molecules, such as different levels of affinities for phosphotyrosine-containing proteins or different substrate specificities for tyrosine kinases, various neuronal signalings mediated by these Shc members might crosstalk over a wide range and in specific combinations. To assess this possibility, we compared the responses of N-Shc and Sck with epidermal growth factor (EGF), neurotrophin, and activated Src tyrosine kinase.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Cell Culture and Reagents-- COS-1, NIH3T3, and SR-3Y1 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's/F-12 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum. EGF and NGF were purchased from Toyobo (Osaka, Japan), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) came from PeproTech Inc. (London). T7·Tag monoclonal antibody was obtained from Novagen (Madison, WI); anti-phosphotyrosine monoclonal antibody 4G10 was from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. (Lake Placid, NY); and anti-pan-Trk antibody (C-14) was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Anti-EGF receptor (EGFR) and anti-Grb2 antibodies were procured from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY).

Isolation of Sck cDNA-- Several human expressed sequence tag sequences in the GenBankTM Data Bank were found to encode part of the amino acid sequence of human Sck (13). Among these expressed sequence tag sequences, 5'-CACCACATGCCGTCCATCTCCTTC-3' in HEEB09 and 5'-TGGTGACGCTGTCTCGCACAAGGA-3' in T05885 were selected as primers to produce an 810-bp Sck probe by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction with poly(A)-containing RNA isolated from human brain. A human frontal cortex-derived cDNA library (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) was screened with this Sck probe. Eight overlapping cDNAs were obtained, and their sequences were determined. Thereafter, a 470-bp HindIII-HindIII fragment of the clone located closest to the 5'-end of Sck mRNA was isolated and used as a probe for further screening. Six additional clones were obtained, and their composite nucleotide sequence was determined. The rat homolog of human Sck was isolated by screening a rat brain cDNA library (Stratagene) with the human 810-bp Sck cDNA fragment as a probe. Four overlapping clones were obtained, and their composite nucleotide sequence was determined.

Northern Blot Analysis-- Human multiple tissue blots I and II and brain tissue blots II and III (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA) were hybridized as described before (16) with DNA probes: Shc (nucleotides 984-2075) (20), N-Shc (nucleotides 695-1170) (16), and Sck (nucleotides 614-1423; GenBankTM accession number AB001451). The human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase control probe (nucleotide 586-1037) (21) was used for verifying equal loading of poly(A)+ RNAs from different tissues and brain regions.

In Situ Hybridization-- Brains of mature adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were frozen in 2-methylbutane at -25 °C. Sections (13 µm) were cut on a cryostat, mounted on gelatin-coated slides, and stored at -80 °C until used. Frozen sections were brought to room temperature, post-fixed, acetylated, and dehydrated. In situ hybridization with 35S-labeled (see Fig. 3) or digoxigenin-labeled (see Fig. 4) cRNA probes was carried out as described previously (16, 22). Antisense RNA probes were synthesized in vitro by use of T7 RNA polymerase with rat Shc (pRShc-1; linearized with HindIII), rat N-Shc (pRNShc-3; linearized with PstI), and rat Sck (pRSck-4S; linearized with HindIII) plasmids used as templates. Antisense probes of SCG10, a neuron-specific marker (22), were synthesized and used as external controls.

Transient Transfection Experiments-- The construction of pCMV1-T7NSHC and pSV2-TrkB was described previously (16). The plasmid pDM-69 (23) was used for the expression of the human TrkA receptor. The human Sck cDNA containing PTB, CH, and SH2 domains (nucleotides 250-2396; GenBankTM accession number AB001451) with the T7 peptide (ASMTGGQQMGR) tag at the amino terminus was subcloned into the BglII and XbaI sites of mammalian expression vector pCMV1 (24) to generate pCMV1-T7SCK. COS-1, NIH3T3, or SR-3Y1 cells were transfected with the following plasmids by use of 60 µg of LipofectAmine (Life Technologies, Inc.): for COS-1 (see Fig. 5) or SR-3Y1 cells, a combination of 4.8 µg of pCMV1-T7NSHC and 7.2 µg of pCMV1 or 12 µg of pCMV1-T7SCK only; for NIH3T3 or COS-1 (see Fig. 6, K-M) cells, a combination of 4 µg of pCMV1-T7NSHC, 0.6 µg of Trk-expressing plasmid, and 7.4 µg of pCMV1 or a combination of 10 µg of pCMV1-T7NSHC, 0.6 µg of Trk-expressing plasmid, and 1.4 µg of pCMV1. As a negative control, the Trk-expressing plasmid was substituted with an equal amount of pCMV1 (see Fig. 6, A-J, first and fourth lanes). At this ratio, equal levels of N-Shc and Sck proteins were expressed in transfected cells. The transfected COS-1 and NIH3T3 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's/F-12 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum for 30 h; serum-starved (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's/F-12 medium containing 0.5% fetal bovine serum) for 18 h; and then stimulated with 100 ng/ml EGF (COS-1 cells in Fig. 5), 200 ng/ml NGF or BDNF (NIH3T3 cells), or 200 ng/ml NGF (COS-1 cells in Fig. 6, K-M) for 5 min. The transfected SR-3Y1 cells were directly lysed for immunoprecipitation following serum starvation.

Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting-- Immunoprecipitation was performed as described previously (16). For immunoblotting, either specific immunoprecipitates or whole cell lysates were electrophoresed and electrotransferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA). Blots were blocked and probed with specific antibodies diluted in phosphate-buffered saline/Tween 20 buffer containing 1% nonfat skim milk (Difco). After having been washed, immunocomplexes were detected with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated species-specific secondary antibody (Amersham International, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom) and an ECL chemiluminescence system (Amersham International).

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Cloning of Human and Rat Sck cDNAs-- To elucidate the regional distribution of Shc family members in the nervous system, we sought to obtain Sck cDNA in addition to the previously isolated Shc and N-Shc cDNAs (16). Since the nucleotide sequence of Sck was not reported, we amplified an 810-bp Sck fragment by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction based on expressed sequence tag sequences encoding partial amino acid sequences of human Sck protein (13). By screening a human frontal cortex-derived cDNA library with this probe, we obtained 14 overlapping clones. The determined nucleotide sequence of human Sck cDNA is 2390 bp in length and has an open reading frame of at least 1470 nucleotides and a poly(A) tail at its 3'-end. The deduced Sck amino acid sequence includes complete PTB, CH, and SH2 domains, although the N terminus of the encoded protein could have been slightly deleted (Fig. 1). By Northern blot analysis, the major transcript of human Sck was estimated to be ~2.7 kilobases (Fig. 2), suggesting that ~300 bp or so of the 5'-end were missing from these clones. Fig. 2 also shows the existence of minor isoforms of Sck transcripts. Some differences at the N terminus were found between this human Sck sequence and that previously reported by Pelicci et al. (15). The human Sck sequence in Fig. 1 and that reported by Kavanaugh and Williams (13) were the same in the range that we can compare, whereas the sequence reported by Pelicci et al. was different from that reported by Kavanaugh and Williams as well as from our sequence at the N terminus. Thus, we believe that our sequence is correct. The discrepancy of the reported N-terminal sequences of Sck protein may come from the alternatively spliced transcripts described above. We also isolated rat Sck cDNA, which had a complete encoding capacity for PTB, CH, and SH2 domains.


View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Comparison of the predicted amino acid sequences of human Sck, rat Sck, human p52N-shc, rat p52N-shc, and human p52shc. Amino acids conserved among all Shc members aligned here are indicated by asterisks. Amino acids conserved between human (h) and rat (r) clones are in upper-case letters for Sck and N-Shc. The sequences of the PTB and SH2 domains are boxed. Shaded boxes indicate the proline-rich sequences in each Shc member.


View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Tissue and neuronal distribution of human Shc family members. A, Northern blot of Shc (upper), N-Shc (middle), and Sck (lower) mRNAs from various human adult tissues. Lane 1, heart; lane 2, brain; lane 3, placenta; lane 4, lung; lane 5, liver; lane 6, skeletal muscle; lane 7, kidney; lane 8, pancreas; lane 9, spleen; lane 10, thymus; lane 11, prostate; lane 12, testis; lane 13, ovary; lane 14, small intestine; lane 15, colon; lane 16, peripheral blood leukocyte. B, Northern blot of Shc (upper), N-Shc (middle), and Sck (lower) mRNAs from various areas of adult human brain. Lane 1, cerebellum; lane 2, cerebral cortex; lane 3, medulla; lane 4, spinal cord; lane 5, occipital pole; lane 6, frontal lobe; lane 7, temporal lobe; lane 8, putamen; lane 9, amygdala; lane 10, caudate nucleus; lane 11, corpus callosum; lane 12, hippocampus; lane 13, hypothalamus; lane 14, substantia nigra; lane 15, subthalamic nucleus; lane 16, thalamus.

These nearly full-length Sck clones revealed that the N-terminal PTB and the C-terminally located SH2 domains are highly homologous to those of Shc and N-Shc (Fig. 1). In contrast, the internal CH domain of Sck diverges from the others, although there are several conserved residues that are functionally important, e.g. (i) YVN(T/V) (residues 321-324 in human Sck and residues 299-302 in rat Sck), the Grb2-binding site (7, 8); (ii) HXYYN (residues 243-247 in human Sck and residues 218-222 in rat Sck), which was shown to act as another Grb2-binding site (9, 10) and to mediate survival signals in the case of Shc (25); and (iii) (K/R)DLFDM(K/R)FPE (residues 338-347 in human Sck and residues 326-335 in rat Sck), which was required in Shc for adaptin binding (26). In addition to the fully conserved sites among the Shc members, there were several proline-rich motifs that were unique to each Shc member (Fig. 1). These proline-rich motifs are considered to be the recognition sites of SH3-containing proteins (27). A comparison of human and rodent Sck, N-Shc, and Shc revealed that each Shc member has unique potential SH3-binding site(s), thus leading to differential downstream signalings.

Tissue Distribution of Shc, N-Shc, and Sck Transcripts-- We compared Sck expression with that of Shc and N-Shc using the same blot of human adult tissues (Fig. 2A). As previously reported, Shc was broadly expressed in most human tissues except brain. In marked contrast, N-Shc mRNA was specifically expressed in brain tissue and was hardly detectable in other tissues except pancreas. Similar to Shc mRNA, the Sck message was distributed rather broadly. Notably, the brain showed a moderate level of Sck mRNA expression. Thus, Sck is the second major member of the Shc family that is expressed in the human brain.

Regional Expression of N-Shc and Sck mRNAs in the Brain-- We next compared the expression of the Shc, N-Shc, and Sck mRNAs in various brain regions and spinal cord in human by Northern blot analysis (Fig. 2B). The distribution of N-Shc and Sck mRNAs in the human brain was rather complex. N-Shc mRNA was detected in abundance in the cerebral cortex, frontal and temporal lobes, occipital pole, hippocampus, caudate nucleus, and amygdala, but its level was very low or undetectable in the cerebellum, medulla, and spinal cord. Expression of Sck mRNA overlapped partially with that of N-Shc mRNA, with notable differences: N-Shc mRNA was highly expressed in the caudate nucleus and was very low in the hypothalamus, whereas Sck mRNA was abundantly expressed in the hypothalamus and was nearly undetectable in the caudate nucleus (Fig. 2B).

To further examine the regional expression of N-Shc and Sck transcripts in the brain, we compared the mRNA expression of the Shc members in rat brain tissues by in situ hybridization. In our previous experiments, N-Shc mRNA was found to be rather broadly expressed in the embryonic nervous system and postnatal brain (16). Surprisingly, however, in the mature brain, it became evident that the N-Shc message was particularly abundant in the thalamus (Fig. 3B). In contrast, Sck mRNA was widely distributed throughout the whole brain, with the highest levels found in the hippocampus (Fig. 3C). In a high-power view of the hippocampal area, both N-Shc and Sck mRNAs were detected in both pyramidal neurons and granule cells in the CA1 through CA3 regions and dentate gyrus, respectively; cells in the hilus also showed high expression of N-Shc and Sck messages (data not shown).


View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   In situ hybridization showing the distribution of Shc, N-Shc, and Sck mRNAs in the adult rat brain. Representative autoradiograms of in situ hybridization experiments using nearly adjacent horizontal sections and 35S-labeled antisense RNA as a probe for each member of the Shc family are shown. A, Shc probe; B, N-Shc probe; C, Sck probe. Experiments using the sense control showed only background levels of signals (not shown), as shown in A for Shc. The arrowhead in B points to the thalamus, and the small arrow points to the hippocampus. Th, thalamus; Hp, hippocampus; Ob, olfactory bulb. Scale bar = 5 mm.

Although only N-Shc and Sck were detected in the brain, this was not true for the peripheral nervous system, where a considerable level of Shc mRNA expression was observed (Fig. 4). Shc transcripts were predominantly observed in the superior cervical ganglion (SCG) areas (Fig. 4A). Shc-positive cells were only sparsely distributed in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG). Shc mRNA expression in the spinal cord was restricted to part of the motor neurons (Fig. 4A, small arrow). Sck mRNA expression in the peripheral nervous system (DRG and SCG) was much higher than in the brain (Fig. 4C). Although the Sck message was broadly detected in the spinal cord, high-level expression was restricted to the motor neurons. In contrast, N-Shc expression in DRG and SCG was very low or undetectable (Fig. 4B). In the spinal cord, an overall expression of N-Shc mRNA was observed.


View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   In situ hybridization of Shc family members in transverse sections of the trunk region of an embryonic day 19 rat embryo. Adjacent sections were used for hybridization using nonradioactive probes as described under "Experimental Procedures." A, Shc; B, N-Shc; C, Sck; D, SCG10 as a control pan-neuronal gene. Signal-positive regions of DRG and SCG are indicated by large arrowheads and arrows, respectively. Small arrows point to the signal-positive cells in the spinal cord.

The regional expression profile of N-Shc and Sck mRNAs in the adult rat brain (Fig. 3) was considerably different from that observed when RNA samples extracted from post-mortem human brain were analyzed by Northern blotting (Fig. 2B). Consistent with in situ data, semiquantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction experiments using RNA samples from various rat brain regions demonstrated that the thalamus was the highest source of N-Shc mRNA. The striatum and cerebral cortex showed moderate levels of N-Shc mRNA expression, and the cerebellum showed a low level of N-Shc mRNA expression (data not shown). Thus, the apparent difference in the expression profiles of N-Shc and Sck mRNAs may reflect a species variation.

EGF Signaling Is Equally Mediated by Both N-Shc and Sck-- Given the structural similarity and differential expression profile, questions arise as to how N-Shc and Sck share or differentiate neuronal signaling pathways. Also, do their adapter functions overlap with each other, or do they have certain distinct roles? We sought to answer these questions by examining the binding affinities of N-Shc and Sck for EGF and neurotrophin receptors as well as by investigating the response of N-Shc and Sck to the action of Src, a non-receptor tyrosine kinase.

We previously demonstrated that activated EGFR was able to bind N-Shc and to induce N-Shc tyrosine phosphorylation and subsequent association with Grb2 (16). Since we obtained a nearly full-length Sck cDNA that encoded complete PTB, CH, and SH2 domains, we asked the question of whether Sck is similarly responsive to EGF signaling compared with Shc and N-Shc. We performed a co-immunoprecipitation experiment using T7 peptide-tagged N-Shc or Sck and compared their responses to EGF stimulation. Even though the T7 peptide-tagged Sck cDNA used here lacked the most 5'-end of the open reading frame, the deduced Sck amino acid sequences contained complete PTB, CH, and SH2 domains. Therefore, we believe that the expressed Sck retains full activity concerning phosphotyrosine signaling pathways, as has been demonstrated for p46shc, the smallest Shc isoform (13, 28, 29). COS-1 cells were transfected with either T7 peptide-tagged N-Shc or Sck cDNA and were then stimulated with EGF for 5 min, lysed, and immunoprecipitated with anti-T7 peptide antibody. The immunoprecipitates were then immunoblotted with anti-EGFR antibody. EGF stimulated equally well the association between EGFR and N-Shc and between EGFR and Sck (Fig. 5A). In addition, a similar increase was observed in the tyrosine phosphorylation of N-Shc and Sck (Fig. 5B). Furthermore, the subsequent binding of either N-Shc or Sck to Grb2 was nearly identical (Fig. 5C). These results indicate that EGF signaling is mediated efficiently by both N-Shc and Sck in a quantitatively similar manner.


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   An equal level of N-Shc/Sck tyrosine phosphorylation and association with EGFR and Grb2 in response to EGF stimulation. COS-1 cells transfected with T7 peptide-tagged N-Shc (lanes 1 and 2) or Sck (lanes 3 and 4) cDNA were treated or not with EGF and immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-T7 peptide antibody. The immunoprecipitates were then immunoblotted with antibodies as indicated: anti-EGFR antibody (A), anti-phosphotyrosine (anti-PTyr) antibody (B), and anti-Grb2 antibody (C). (D), to confirm that equal amounts of N-Shc and Sck proteins were immunoprecipitated with anti-T7 peptide antibody, the same immunoprecipitates were immunoblotted with anti-T7 peptide antibody.

N-Shc Has Higher Affinity for TrkA and TrkB Receptors than Sck-- We next compared the responses of N-Shc and Sck following NGF or BDNF stimulation by using transfected fibroblasts (NIH3T3) as a model (Fig. 6, A-J). NIH3T3 cells were transfected with either T7 peptide-tagged N-Shc or Sck cDNA together with a Trk-expressing plasmid. The transfected cells were incubated for 5 min with or without neurotrophins (NGF or BDNF), lysed, and immunoprecipitated with anti-T7 peptide antibody. The immunoprecipitates were then immunoblotted with anti-pan-Trk antibody. In these experiments, N-Shc was efficiently associated with TrkA and TrkB receptors in the presence or absence of ligands. Surprisingly, however, Sck was unable to form such a complex with Trk receptors under these conditions (Fig. 6, A and F). The T7 peptide-tagged N-Shc and Sck proteins recovered from the transfected cells were equal in amount (Fig. 6, D and I). More important, even in the transfection with Sck cDNA, the levels of Trk expression were nearly equal as evidenced by the immunoblotting of whole lysates with anti-Trk antibody (Fig. 6, E and J). The different affinities of N-Shc and Sck for Trk receptors were confirmed by another immunoprecipitation experiment with anti-Trk antibody using the similarly transfected COS-1 cells (Fig. 6, K-M). Anti-Trk immunoprecipitates contained a large amount of N-Shc, although the Sck protein in these immunoprecipitates was nearly undetectable (Fig. 6L). Furthermore, Fig. 6 (B and G) shows that the tyrosine phosphorylation of N-Shc by activated Trk receptors was more efficient than that of Sck. In addition, the subsequent binding of N-Shc to Grb2 was higher than that of Sck (Fig. 6, C and H). However, the tyrosine phosphorylation of Sck and the association between Sck and Grb2 were somewhat detectable, and the degrees of Sck phosphorylation and Sck-Grb2 binding were significantly increased in the presence of ligand (Fig. 6, B, C, G, and H). There may be a functional difference between the phosphorylated N-Shc associated with Trk receptors and the phosphorylated Sck separate from the Trk receptors (see "Discussion"). In these experiments, the induction by neurotrophins of the association between Trk receptors and N-Shc/Sck as well as the subsequent phosphorylation and Grb2 binding of N-Shc/Sck were moderate; this could be mainly due to the overexpression of Trk receptors (see "Discussion"). The co-immunoprecipitation experiments using T7 peptide-tagged N-Shc and Sck proteins thus revealed that N-Shc is a higher affinity adapter protein than Sck for TrkA and TrkB receptors, although a different role of phosphorylated Sck in neurotrophin signaling can be considered.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Comparison of the responses of N-Shc and Sck to NGF or BDNF stimulation. A-D, NIH3T3 cells transfected with T7 peptide-tagged N-Shc (first lane) or Sck (fourth lane) cDNA only or cotransfected with T7 peptide-tagged N-Shc (second and third lanes) or Sck (fifth and sixth lanes) cDNA together with TrkA cDNA were mock-treated (-) or treated with NGF (+) and immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-T7 peptide antibody. The immunoprecipitates were then immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies: anti-pan-Trk antiserum (A), anti-phosphotyrosine (anti-PTyr) antibody (B), anti-Grb2 antibody (C), and anti-T7 peptide antibody (D). E, the whole lysates of the transfected NIH3T3 cells were immunoblotted with anti-pan-Trk antiserum. F-J, a similar immunoprecipitation/immunoblotting experiment was done as described above with TrkB cDNA and BDNF used instead of TrkA cDNA and NGF, respectively. K and L, COS-1 cells cotransfected with T7 peptide-tagged N-Shc (first and second lanes) or Sck (third and fourth lanes) cDNA together with TrkA cDNA were incubated or not with NGF and immunoprecipitated with anti-Trk antiserum. The immunoprecipitates were immunoblotted with anti-Trk antiserum (K) or anti-T7 peptide antibody (L). M, the whole lysates of the transfected COS-1 cells were immunoblotted with anti-T7 peptide antibody.

A Divergent Response between N-Shc and Sck to Src Tyrosine Kinase-- A more marked functional difference between N-Shc and Sck was found in the response to Src tyrosine kinase. We transfected v-src-transformed rat 3Y1 fibloblasts (SR-3Y1) with T7 peptide-tagged N-Shc or Sck cDNA. Transfected cells were serum-starved, lysed, and immunoprecipitated with anti-T7 peptide antibody. The immunoprecipitates were then immunoblotted with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody. The tyrosine residues in N-Shc in the v-src-transformed fibroblasts were efficiently phosphorylated, whereas the tyrosine phosphorylation of Sck was hardly detectable (Fig. 7A). The T7 peptide-tagged N-Shc and Sck proteins recovered from the transfected SR-3Y1 cells were equal in amount (Fig. 7B). Another important finding is that Sck specifically associated with a particular tyrosine-phosphorylated protein of ~135 kDa (designated pp135) in SR-3Y1 cells (Fig. 7A). N-Shc-pp135 binding was less tight by at least 20-fold. In the course of analyzing the neurotrophin signaling, we also observed the binding of Sck to pp135, although it was very weak; a prolonged exposure of the blots presented in Fig. 6 (B and G) revealed the association between Sck and pp135 (Fig. 7, C and D). Sck-pp135 binding was independent of neurotrophin/Trk (Fig. 7, C and D) as well as EGF (data not shown) stimulation; thus, the tyrosine phosphorylation of pp135 in Fig. 7 (C and D) can be regarded as basal. These data indicate that pp135, a possible partner of Sck, is highly and specifically phosphorylated by Src tyrosine kinase.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Comparison of the responses of N-Shc and Sck to activated Src tyrosine kinase. A and B, v-src-transformed 3Y1 (SR-3Y1) cells transfected with T7 peptide-tagged N-Shc or Sck cDNA were serum-starved and immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-T7 peptide antibody. The immunoprecipitates were then immunoblotted with anti-phosphotyrosine (anti-PTyr) antibody (A) or anti-T7 peptide antibody (B). C and D, the immunoblots were exposed 6-fold longer than those in Fig. 6 (B and G, respectively). The positions of pp135 are indicated by arrowheads. For details, see the legend of Fig. 6. Note that the exposure time of the blots in C and D was 60-fold longer than in A.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

The Shc adapter protein functions in mediating a variety of phosphotyrosine signalings (2). In the past few years, we and others have isolated two additional Shc-related sequences, i.e. N-Shc/ShcC/Rai (14-16) and Sck/ShcB/Sli (13-15), both of which are expressed in the brain. Thus, shc, N-shc, and sck form a small gene family, the shc family; however, N-Shc and Sck are the dominant adapters in the brain. In this study, we demonstrated distinct expression profiles of the three Shc family members in the central and peripheral nervous systems as well as differential responses of N-Shc and Sck to neurotrophin signaling and to Src activation.

If differential expression in the Shc family means distinct roles of the respective members, their localization should give us good clues for elucidating their functions. For example, high-level expression of N-Shc transcripts in the adult rat brain was restricted to the thalamus. It is of interest to note that another molecule in cytoplasmic signaling, protein kinase Cdelta , was recently shown to be highly and specifically expressed in the thalamus (30). Protein kinase Cdelta can be tyrosine-phosphorylated, and its activity is thereby regulated (31). These findings may suggest the possibility of functional linkage between N-Shc and protein kinase Cdelta in phosphotyrosine signaling in the thalamus area. In contrast, the hippocampus was the region of the strongest Sck mRNA expression in the adult rat brain. The level of Sck mRNA was high in both pyramidal and granule cells in the hippocampus. This may suggest a potential involvement of rat Sck in hippocampal function.

Neurotrophic factors play a central role in neuronal survival and differentiation in the developing nervous systems as well as in the adult (32). Research over the past several years has clarified various steps by which Trk receptors mediate Ras activation as well as subsequent MAP kinase cascades in response to neurotrophins (33). Shc was originally identified as an efficient Trk tyrosine kinase substrate and was demonstrated to be a principal mediator of neuronal differentiation elicited by NGF through Ras-dependent MAP kinase activation in PC12 cells (11, 12). The amount of Shc protein, however, was found to be very low in the brain. Our present study established that N-Shc and Sck are expressed in a region-specific manner in the brain and that N-Shc is a higher affinity adapter molecule than Sck for TrkA and TrkB receptors in NGF and BDNF signalings. These data indicate the dominant existence of the Trk·phospho-N-Shc·Grb2 complex at the membrane fraction in central neurons; this complex should transmit signal to Ras through the membrane relocation of SOS. However, the tyrosine phosphorylation of Sck by activated Trk receptors was somewhat detectable, although less efficient than that of N-Shc. The phospho-Sck·Grb2 complex was separate from Trk receptors, and thus, this complex could exert a signaling function in the cytoplasmic space. Multiple downstream effectors of Grb2, other than SOS, have been reported (34-38); one of these Grb2 effectors in the cytoplasm may possibly be utilized in Sck signaling following neurotrophin stimulation.

A quantitative difference has been reported between the responses of tyrosine phosphorylation elicited by NGF and NT-3 (39). In NT-3-treated PC12 cells expressing rat TrkC receptors, the tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc and MAP kinase was less pronounced compared with that in NGF-treated cells, although the NT-3-treated cells exhibited longer neurites in comparison with the NGF-treated cells. This result suggests that NT-3 signaling through the TrkC receptor does not use Shc, but depends upon other adapter molecules unrelated to Shc. Our preliminary experiments involving transient transfection assays using a porcine TrkC receptor cDNA indicated that there was little difference between N-Shc and Sck in the NT-3 response.2 Thus, NT-3 signaling may use some adapter molecule(s) other than the Shc family members.

We used in vitro transfected NIH3T3 or COS-1 cells as a model, and N-Shc was shown to have a higher affinity for TrkA and TrkB receptors than Sck (Fig. 6). However, the induction by neurotrophins of the association between Trk receptors and N-Shc/Sck, the N-Shc/Sck phosphorylation, and the subsequent binding of N-Shc/Sck to Grb2 were marginal in our system. Immunoprecipitation experiments with and without Trk cDNA transfection (Fig. 6, A-J) showed that, in the absence of the ligands, overexpressed (and auto-activated) Trk receptors could associate with N-Shc/Sck, phosphorylate the tyrosine residues of N-Shc/Sck, and induce binding between N-Shc/Sck and Grb2 to some extent, as was previously observed (12, 40). In addition, the absence of p75NGFR in our system could reduce the induction by neurotrophins because the p75 receptor was reported to enhance NGF-induced TrkA tyrosine kinase activity and furthermore to inhibit the TrkA activity in the absence of NGF (33, 41). These results may explain why the marginal induction by neurotrophins was observed in Fig. 6. In fact, a marked increase in the tyrosine phosphorylation of N-Shc following BDNF stimulation was observed in primary cultures of rat cerebral cortical neurons.2

The neuronal function of Shc has recently been extended to be involved in the signalings activated by calcium elevation and G-protein-coupled receptor stimulation (6, 42). Elevation of the Ca2+ level and G-protein-coupled receptor stimulation were shown to induce Ras-dependent MAP kinase activation and were suggested to be mediated by Src family kinases, a brain-enriched PYK2 tyrosine kinase, and EGFR (5, 43-45). These tyrosine kinases were shown to phosphorylate Shc and were suggested to activate the Ras/MAP kinase pathway by virtue of Shc and the Grb2·SOS complex (6, 19). In the central nervous system, however, we now have two Shc homologs, N-Shc and Sck. N-Shc and Sck were shown to mediate EGF signaling equally (Fig. 5). Therefore, both adapter proteins could be utilized in the neuronal signals by virtue of the tyrosine kinase activity of EGFR following calcium entry and neurotransmitter stimulation.

We found that N-Shc, but not Sck, was efficiently phosphorylated by activated Src tyrosine kinase, whereas Sck, but not N-Shc, associated with pp135, which appeared to be highly phosphorylated by v-Src. The pp135 binding may be Sck-specific because no similar tyrosine-phosphorylated protein was coprecipitated with anti-Shc antibody in v-src-transformed rat fibroblasts (4). Src was found to be involved in Ras-dependent MAP kinase activation following Ca2+ entry in PC12 cells (43). Src and other Src family members, e.g. Fyn and Lyn, were recently shown to mediate the signals from G-protein-coupled receptors to Ras/MAP kinase by way of the Shc·Grb2·SOS complex (44, 46, 47). The notable difference between N-Shc and Sck in the response to activated Src kinase indicates distinct functions of these two adapter molecules in signaling cascades mediated by Src (or Src family kinases) in central neurons.

Recently, Shc (and the Shc family) has been discussed to provide a convergence point for multiple signaling pathways: one path is composed of receptor tyrosine kinases, adapter proteins, and Ras, and the other pathway uses calcium and trimeric G-proteins (6, 19). The presumed role of Shc family members as go-betweens in the signaling crosstalk seems more plausible in the nervous system in light of the observations that Ca2+-dependent survival of cortical neurons can be blocked by anti-BDNF antibody (48), and cultured retinal ganglion cells respond to growth factor stimulation more efficiently when depolarized (49). Based upon our new findings of distinct expression profiles and functional specificities of N-Shc and Sck, we assume that multiple signalings in the central nervous system mediated by N-Shc and Sck can crosstalk in a specific combination.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Y. Naruse for help in the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction experiments, Dr. B. Lu for critical reading of the manuscript, Dr. M. Barbacid for providing the expression vector pDM-69, and Drs. S. Shiosaka and N. Ito for use of the cryostat.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequences reported in this paper have been submitted to the GSDB, DDBJ, GenBankTM/EMBL, and NCBI Data Banks with accession numbers AB001451 (human Sck cDNA) and AB001452 (rat Sck cDNA).

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. For T. N., Tel.: 81-45-853-7275; Fax: 81-45-853-3528. For N. M., Tel.: 81-562-46-2311; Fax: 81-562-44-6592.

1 The abbreviations used are: PTB domain, phosphotyrosine-binding domain; CH domain, collagen homology domain; MAP, mitogen-activated protein; NGF, nerve growth factor; EGF, epidermal growth factor; EGFR, EGF receptor; BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; bp, base pair(s); SCG, superior cervical ganglion; DRG, dorsal root ganglion; NT-3, neurotrophin-3.

2 T. Nakamura, T. Kojima, A. Nakai, and N. Mori, unpublished data.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Schlessinger, J. (1994) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 4, 25-30[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Pawson, T. (1995) Nature 373, 573-580[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. van der Geer, P., Wiley, S., Gish, G. D., Lai, V. K., Stephens, R., White, M. F., Kaplan, D., Pawson, T. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 963-968[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. McGlade, J., Cheng, A., Pelicci, G., Pelicci, P. G., Pawson, T. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 8869-8873[Abstract]
  5. Lev, S., Moreno, H., Martinez, R., Canoll, P., Peles, E., Musaccio, J. M., Plowman, G. D., Rudy, B., Schlessinger, J. (1995) Nature 376, 737-745[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Finkbeiner, S., and Greenberg, M. E. (1996) Neuron 16, 233-236[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Rozakis-Adcock, M., McGlade, J., Mbamalu, G., Pelicci, G., Daly, R., Li, W., Batzer, A., Thomas, S., Brugge, J., Pelicci, P. G., Schlessinger, J., Pawson, T. (1992) Nature 360, 689-692[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Salcini, A. E., McGlade, J., Pelicci, G., Nicoletti, I., Pawson, T., and Pelicci, P. G. (1994) Oncogene 9, 2827-2836[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. van der Geer, P., Wiley, S., Gish, G. D., Pawson, T. (1996) Curr. Biol. 6, 1435-1444[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Thomas, D., and Bradshaw, R. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 22293-22299[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Obermeier, A., Bradshaw, R. A., Seedorf, K., Choidas, A., Schlessinger, J., and Ullrich, A. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 1585-1590[Abstract]
  12. Stephens, R. M., Loeb, D. M., Copeland, T. D., Pawson, T., Greene, L. A., Kaplan, D. R. (1994) Neuron 12, 691-705[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Kavanaugh, W. M., and Williams, L. T. (1994) Science 266, 1862-1865[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. O'Bryan, J. P., Songyang, Z., Cantley, L., Der, C. J., Pawson, T. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 2729-2734[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Pelicci, G., Dente, L., Giuseppe, A. D., Verducci-Galletti, B., Giuli, S., Mele, S., Vetriani, C., Giorgio, M., Pandolfi, P. P., Cesareni, G., Pelicci, P. G. (1996) Oncogene 13, 633-641[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Nakamura, T., Sanokawa, R., Sasaki, Y., Ayusawa, D., Oishi, M., and Mori, N. (1996) Oncogene 13, 1111-1121[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Wagner, K. R., Mei, L., and Huganir, R. L. (1991) Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 1, 65-73[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Heumann, R. (1994) Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 4, 668-679[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Bourne, H. R. (1995) Nature 376, 727-729[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Pelicci, G., Lanfrancone, L., Grignani, F., McGlade, J., Cavallo, F., Forni, G., Nicoletti, I., Grignani, F., Pawson, T., and Pelicci, P. G. (1992) Cell 70, 93-104[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Arcari, P. (1984) Nucleic Acids Res. 12, 9179-9189[Abstract]
  22. Himi, T., Okazaki, T., Wang, H., McNeill, T. H., Mori, N. (1994) Neuroscience 60, 907-926[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Martin-Zance, D., Oskam, R., Mitra, G., Copeland, T., and Barbacid, M. (1989) Mol. Cell. Biol. 9, 24-33[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Andersson, S., Davis, D. L., Dahlbäck, H., Jörnvail, H., and Russell, D. W. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 8222-8229[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Gotoh, N., Tojo, A., and Shibuya, M. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 6197-6204[Abstract]
  26. Okabayashi, Y., Sugimoto, Y., Totty, N. F., Hsuan, J., Kido, Y., Sakaguchi, K., Gout, I., Waterfield, M. D., Kasuga, M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5265-5269[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Cohen, G. B., Ren, R., and Baltimore, D. (1995) Cell 80, 237-248[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Blaikie, P., Immanuel, D., Wu, J., Li, N., Yajnik, V., and Margolis, B. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 32031-32034[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Dikic, I., Batzer, A. G., Blaikie, P., Obermeier, A., Ullrich, A., Schlessinger, J., and Margolis, B. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 15125-15129[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Miettinen, S., Roivainen, R., Keinänen, R., Hökfelt, T., and Kolstinaho, J. (1996) J. Neurosci. 16, 6236-6245[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Li, W., Mischak, H., Yu, J. C., Wang, L. M., Mushinski, J. F., Heidaran, M. A., Pierce, J. H. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 2349-2352[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Hefti, F., Denton, T. L., Knusel, B., and Lapchak, P. A. (1992) in Neurotrophic Factors (Loughlin, S. E., and Fallon, J. H., eds), pp. 25-49, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA
  33. Greene, L. A., and Kaplan, D. R. (1995) Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 5, 579-587[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Gout, I., Dhand, R., Hiles, I. D., Fry, M. J., Panayotou, G., Das, P., Truong, O., Totty, N. F., Hsuan, J., Booker, G. W., Campbell, I. D., Waterfield, M. D. (1993) Cell 75, 25-36[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Miki, H., Miura, K., Matsuoka, K., Nakata, T., Hirokawa, N., Orita, S., Kaibuchi, K., Takai, Y., and Takenawa, T. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 5489-5492[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. McPherson, P. S., Czernik, A., Chilcote, T. J., Onofri, F., Benfenati, F., Greengard, P., Schlessinger, J., De Camilli, P. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 6486-6490[Abstract]
  37. Miki, H., Miura, K., and Takenawa, T. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 5326-5335[Abstract]
  38. Miki, H., Nonoyama, S., Zhu, Q., Aruffo, A., Ochs, H. D., Takenawa, T. (1997) Cell Growth Differ. 8, 195-202[Abstract]
  39. Tsoulfas, P., Stephens, R. M., Kaplan, D. R., Parada, L. F. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5691-5697[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Hempstead, B. L., Rabin, S. J., Kaplan, L., Reid, S., Parada, L. F., Kaplan, D. R. (1992) Neuron 9, 883-896[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Verdi, J. M., Birren, S. J., Ibanez, C. F., Persson, H., Kaplan, D. R., Benedetti, M., Chao, M., Anderson, D. J. (1994) Neuron 12, 733-745[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. van Biesen, T., Hawes, B. E., Luttrell, D. K., Krueger, K. M., Touhara, K., Porfiri, E., Sakaue, M., Luttrell, L. M., Lefkowitz, R. J. (1995) Nature 376, 781-784[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Rusanescu, G., Qi, H., Thomas, S. M., Brugge, J. S., Halegoua, S. (1995) Neuron 15, 1415-1425[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Dikic, I., Tokiwa, G., Lev, S., Courtneidge, S. A., Schlessinger, J. (1996) Nature 383, 547-550[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Rosen, L. B., and Greenberg, M. E. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 1113-1116[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Sadoshima, J., and Izumo, S. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 775-787[Abstract]
  47. Ptasznik, A., Traynor-Kaplan, A., and Bokoch, G. M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem 270, 19969-19973[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Ghosh, A., Carnahan, J., and Greenberg, M. E. (1994) Science 263, 1618-1623[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Meyer-Franke, A., Kaplan, M. R., Pfrieger, F. W., Barres, B. A. (1995) Neuron 15, 805-819[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.