Ethidium Bromide-induced Inhibition of Mitochondrial Gene Transcription Suppresses Glucose-stimulated Insulin Release in the Mouse Pancreatic beta -Cell Line beta HC9*

Takaki Hayakawaabc, Mitsuhiko Nodaacde, Kazuki Yasudaafg, Hiroshi Yorifujih, Shigeki Taniguchii, Ichitomo Miwai, Hiroshi Sakuraa, Yasuo Terauchia, Jun-ichi Hayashij, Geoffrey W. G. Sharpe, Yasunori Kanazawad, Yasuo Akanumaf, Yoshio Yazakia, and Takashi Kadowakia

From the a Third Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113, Japan, d Omiya Medical Center, Jichi Medical School, Omiya, Saitama 330, Japan, f The Institute for Diabetes Care and Research, Asahi Life Foundation, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100, h Second Department of Anatomy, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Saitama 359, Japan, i Department of Pathobiochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Meijo University, Tenpaku-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 468, Japan, j Institute of Biological Science, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan, and e Department of Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Recently, a mitochondrial mutation was found to be associated with maternally inherited diabetes mellitus (Kadowaki, T., Kadowaki, H., Mori, Y., Tobe, K., Sakuta, R., Suzuki, Y., Tanabe, Y, Sakura, H., Awata, T., Goto, Y., Hayakawa, T., Matsuoka, K., Kawamori, R., Kamada, T., Horai, S., Nonaka, I., Hagura, R., Akanuma, Y., and Yazaki, Y. (1994) N. Engl. J. Med. 330, 962-968). In order to elucidate its etiology, we have investigated the involvement of mitochondrial function in insulin secretion. Culture of the pancreatic beta -cell line, beta HC9, with low dose ethidium bromide (EB) (0.4 µg/ml) for 2-6 days resulted in a substantial decrease in the transcription level of mitochondrial DNA (to 10-20% of the control cells) without changing its copy number, whereas the transcription of nuclear genes was grossly unaffected. Electron microscopic analysis revealed that treatment by EB caused morphological changes only in mitochondria and not in other organelles such as nuclei, endoplasmic reticula, Golgi bodies, or secretory granules. When the cells were treated with EB for 6 days, glucose (20 mM) could no longer stimulate insulin secretion, while glibenclamide (1 µM) still did. When EB was removed after 3- or 6-day treatment, mitochondrial gene transcription recovered within 2 days, and the profiles of insulin secretion returned to normal within 7 days. Studies with fura-2 indicated that in EB-treated cells, glucose (20 mM) failed to increase intracellular Ca2+, while the effect of glibenclamide (1 µM) was maintained. Our system provides a unique way to investigate the relationship between mitochondrial function and insulin secretion.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

The mitochondrial genome of mammalian cells encodes 13 polypeptides, two ribosomal RNAs, and 22 transfer RNAs (for a review, see Ref. 1). The mitochondrion is believed to be an organelle derived from a genetic component(s) of microorganisms, and thus its replication, transcription, and translation system has been developed on its own basis, although several nuclear genome-encoded proteins are also essential for these systems. Mitochondrial proteins involved in oxidative phosphorylation are composed of enzyme complexes (I-IV) and cooperate with a number of nuclear genome-encoded proteins for ATP production.

Currently, the following hypothesis is widely accepted as a major part of the glucose-signaling pathways for insulin secretion in pancreatic beta -cells. First, glucose is transported into the pancreatic beta -cells and metabolized through the glycolytic pathway and Krebs cycle. ATP is produced by oxidative phosphorylation within the mitochondria. The increased ATP and decreased ADP concentrations cause depolarization of the plasma membrane via closure of ATP-sensitive K+ channels. Depolarization activates the voltage-dependent calcium channels and increases [Ca2+]i. This increase in [Ca2+]i stimulates exocytosis of insulin granules from the pancreatic beta -cells (for a review, see Ref. 2). Several lines of evidence suggest an important role for the mitochondria in this pathway. First, ATP-sensitive K+ channels are believed to "sense" ATP produced by mitochondria and to convert the information into depolarization of membrane potential. The presence of this type of channels in pancreatic beta -cells was first demonstrated by electrophysiological approaches (3, 4) and recently established on a molecular basis (5, 6). Second, 2-ketoisocaproate, which is metabolized intramitochondrially, exerts the same stimulatory effects on insulin secretion as glucose does (7, 8). Third, it has been shown that mutations of mitochondrial DNA are associated with diabetes mellitus (9-11). We have recently pointed out that diabetic patients with an A to G mutation at position 3243 in mitochondrial DNA (base pair 3243 mutation) have reduced insulin secretory capacity rather than peripheral insulin resistance (12). In addition, Hess et al. (13) and Chomyn et al. (14) showed by in vitro study that this mutation results in mitochondrial transcriptional and translational defects. However, there are few reports that have demonstrated a correlation between mitochondrial (dys)function and insulin secretion directly.

To examine the relationship between mitochondrial function and the stimulation of insulin release, we employed a newly developed insulin-secreting cell line, beta HC9 (15-17), and cultured the cells with ethidium bromide (EB),1 an inhibitor of the synthesis of DNA and RNA. To date, few detailed studies on the role(s) of mitochondrial function in glucose signaling have been performed. In one of these, in which bis-4-piperidyle-dichloride was employed to establish a rho 0 cell line in the MIN6 insulin-secreting cell, it was shown that the presence of mitochondria was essential for glucose-stimulated insulin release (18), as discussed below.

It has been reported that EB, a reagent that inhibits DNA/RNA synthesis, affects transcription/replication of extrachromosomal genetic materials more specifically than those of chromosomal genes (19-21). Recently, human cell lines lacking mitochondrial DNA (rho 0 cells) were established by long term treatment with low concentrations of EB (22, 23). Hayashi et al. (24) also showed that a specific inhibition of replication, transcription, and translation of genes takes place with mitochondrial DNA when a mouse fibroblast cell line was treated with EB for up to 7 days.

In this report, we investigated the effects of EB treatment and the virtual elimination of mitochondrial transcription on glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and on [Ca2+]i. EB treatment blocked the effect of glucose to increase [Ca2+]i and to stimulate insulin secretion. The effect of EB was completely reversed after removal of the EB. These results provide strong evidence that mitochondrial function is crucial for the stimulation of insulin release by glucose.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Materials-- Restriction enzymes and DNA-modifying enzymes were purchased from Takara Shuzo Co. (Kyoto, Japan). EB, bovine serum albumin (BSA), nifedipine, and fura-2 were obtained from Sigma, and [alpha -32P]dCTP was from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Glibenclamide was provided by Hoechst Co., Ltd.

Cell Culture-- beta HC9 was a kind gift from Dr. D. Hanahan (University of California). beta HC9 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 25 mM glucose, 0.11 mg/ml pyruvate, and 0.05 mg/ml uridine supplemented with 15% horse serum, 2.5% fetal bovine serum, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin in 5% CO2. Cells reaching 70-90% confluency were divided to a density of 3 × 104/cm2. For the treated cells, EB was added to the culture medium 18-24 h after plating. Cells of passages near passage 20 were used for experiments, except for the experiments for Fig. 6 and Table III, for which passages 31 and 29 were used, respectively.

DNA Analysis-- The cells were harvested by trypsinization and suspended in 10 mM Tris-HCl and 100 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, containing 100 µg/ml proteinase K and 1% SDS, following a 2-h incubation at 37 °C. Total DNA was purified, and 2 µg of the DNA was digested with BglII, which cleaves the mouse mitochondrial DNA at nucleotide position 15,329 (25). The resultant DNA fragments were subjected to agarose (0.7%) gel electrophoresis, transferred onto Hybond N+ membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and hybridized with the [alpha -32P]dCTP-labeled mouse mitochondrial DNA fragment probe (nucleotide positions 643-9047) containing 12 and 16 S ribosomal RNAs, 10 transfer RNAs, and three peptides corresponding to cytochrome oxidase subunits 1, 2, and 3, and ATPase 6 (25). Southern blot analysis was carried out according to the standard protocol (26). Radioactivity of hybridizing bands was measured by BAS2000 image analyzer (Fujix Co., Japan), and the relative amount of mitochondrial DNA was determined.

RNA Analysis-- Cells were lysed by adding RNAzolB (Biotech Laboratories, Inc., Houston, TX) to the culture plate, and total RNA was prepared following the manufacturer's instructions. Ten µg of the total RNA was denatured and subjected to formaldehyde-containing agarose (1.2%) gel electrophoresis and transferred onto the Hybond N+ membrane. The membrane was hybridized with the [alpha -32P]dCTP-labeled mouse mitochondrial DNA fragment, rat insulin I (27), or human beta -actin cDNA (28) probe according to the standard protocol (26). Radioactivity of hybridizing bands was measured by BAS2000 image analyzer, and the relative amount of each transcript was determined.

Determination of Glucose-phosphorylating Activity-- Glucose-phosphorylating activities by hexokinase (HK) and glucokinase (GK) of either control or EB-treated cells on day 4 were determined fluorometrically as described previously (29, 30).

Electron Microscopic Analysis-- The control and EB-treated cells were fixed overnight with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.3). They were postfixed with 2% OsO4 in the same buffer, followed by en block staining with 1% uranyl acetate. After dehydration with a graded series of ethanol, they were substituted by propylene oxide and embedded in Spurr's low viscosity resin. Silver to gold sections were cut and examined with a JEOL 1010 electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan.).

Insulin Secretion and Content-- The control and EB-treated cells were cultured in 12-well plates. Each well was washed twice with 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline and then incubated with 1 ml of Hanks'-BSA medium composed of Hanks' buffered saline containing 0.2% BSA and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, plus 0.1 mM glucose in 5% CO2 at 37 °C. After incubation for 2 h, the medium was replaced with 1 ml of the Hanks'-BSA medium containing various secretagogues. For the experiment shown in Fig. 6, Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer was used instead of Hanks' buffer. After incubation for 2 h, the medium was collected and centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 2 min, and the supernatant was collected and stored at -20 °C until radioimmunoassay for insulin concentration. For determination of insulin content in the cells, each well was washed twice with 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline and suspended in 1 ml of a solution containing 74% ethanol and 1.4% HCl and kept at -20 °C for 18-24 h. Then the supernatant was collected and stored at -20 °C until assayed. Radioimmunoassay kits (Shionoria; Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Japan) were used for the determination of insulin levels using mouse insulin as standard. Total cellular proteins were extracted by boiling the trypsinized cells in 1% SDS, and protein concentration was determined by the method described by Lowry (31) with BSA as a standard.

Measurement of [Ca2+]i-- Control and EB-treated cells were cultured on a glass coverslip in a 6-cm diameter dish. Each dish was washed twice with 2 ml of phosphate-buffered saline and incubated with 4 ml of Hanks'-BSA medium for 40 min. The cells were then loaded with fura-2 for 40 min in 4 ml of the Hanks'-BSA medium containing 4 µM fura-2 acetoxymethylester (added from a 1 mM stock solution in dimethyl sulfoxide) in 5% CO2 at 37 °C. The glass coverslips were washed three times with 2 ml of the Hanks'-BSA medium before measurement of [Ca2+]i. The [Ca2+]i was measured before and then 15 and 30 min after stimulation by replacement with the Hanks'-BSA medium containing 20 mM glucose or 1 µM glibenclamide. All measurements of [Ca2+]i were carried out at 37 °C. A dual excitation digital imaging system (Argus 100 image analysis system; Hamamatsu Photonics Inc., Japan) was used for the measurements. Epi-illumination at 340- or 360-nm wavelength from a mercury lamp was used to excite fura-2. Emitted fluorescence was magnified through a fluorescence objective lens (× 10; Nikon Inc., Japan) taken by a silicon-intensified tube camera, and then converted into a digitized value of 256 gray levels at each pixel. Paired fluorescence images by 360-nm wavelength excitation were taken before and after a single measurement and interpolated each time. The signal fluorescence by 340-nm wavelength was converted into a ratio divided by the value of interpolated 360 nm at each pixel to yield a pseudocolor image of [Ca2+]i (32). Conversion from the ratio to [Ca2+]i was performed using a Ca2+-EGTA standard (Molecular Probes, Inc.). Data were expressed as two-dimensional mean values of [Ca2+]i, which were calculated by averaging the values of all of the pixels over the cellular area.

Statistical Analysis-- Data shown are means ± S.D. of triplicate observations in a single representative experiment unless otherwise indicated.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Characteristics of beta HC9 Cells upon Insulin Secretion-- Table I summarizes the characteristics of insulin secretion and insulin content in beta HC9 cells. Analyses were carried out when cells reached 70-90% confluency. Twenty mM glucose induced a substantial increase in insulin secretion from the basal level (0.1 mM glucose alone). Half-maximal effect of glucose on insulin secretion was obtained at 10-15 mM (shown later), consistent with the results of Radvanyi et al. (15) and Noda et al. (17). Glibenclamide (1 µM), KCl (20 mM), and 2-ketoisocaproate (10 mM) also stimulated insulin secretion. In other experiments, it was shown that nifedipine (100 nM), an inhibitor of L-type voltage-dependent calcium channels, inhibited the stimulation of insulin secretion by glucose (20 mM) or glibenclamide (1 µM) (percentage of inhibition: 89.3 ± 6.9% and 81.7 ± 11.9%, respectively), and it was also shown that these secretagogues did not increase the insulin content during 2-h incubations (total insulin content after 2-h incubation was 100 ± 6, 105 ± 9, and 99 ± 12% for 0.1 mM glucose, the addition of 20 mM glucose, and 1 µM glibenclamide, respectively).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Insulin secretion from beta HC9 cells by glucose and other secretagogues
Secretion from beta HC9 cells by various secretagogues were evaluated as described under "Experimental Procedures." Means ± S.D. of triplicate observations in a single representative experiment are shown here.

Effect of EB on Mitochondrial Replication and Transcription-- beta HC9 cells were incubated for 4 days with various concentrations of EB in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with pyruvate and uridine, which was previously shown to be essential for the growth of rho 0 cells (cells lacking mitochondrial DNA) (22). Fig. 1A shows changes in gene transcription in EB-treated cells measured by Northern blot analyses. The mitochondrial DNA probe used for these analyses detected several transcripts (two rRNAs, 10 tRNAs, and four peptides), including two major hybridized bands. The relative quantity of the mitochondrial transcripts was calculated in comparison with the radioactivity of 16 S transcript(s). These analyses showed that the reduction of mitochondrial transcription by EB treatment occurred in a concentration-dependent manner, and the mitochondrial transcription level of EB-treated (0.4 µg/ml) cells was reduced to 10-20% of the control cells, whereas the transcription of the insulin gene was not affected. Transcription of beta -actin was also unaffected as described below.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Effect of EB on mitochondrial transcription. beta HC9 cells were plated in a 10-cm dish at a density of 3 × 104/cm2 and cultured overnight, and then EB at the indicated concentrations was added. After a 4-day culture, total RNA or DNA was prepared. Hybridization was carried out in the presence of 30% (v/v) formamide at 42 °C overnight. The membrane was washed with 0.1 × SSPE containing 0.1% SDS at 65 °C. A, 20 µg of the total RNA was separated and transferred to the Hybond N+ membrane as described under "Experimental Procedures." The membrane was first hybridized with mouse mitochondrial DNA (nucleotide positions 643-9047) (Mt) and then rehybridized with rat insulin I cDNA (Insulin). B, BglII-digested total DNA (2 µg) was separated and transferred onto the Hybond N+ membrane as described under "Experimental Procedures." The membrane was initially hybridized with mouse mitochondrial DNA (nucleotide positions 643-9047).

The copy number of mitochondrial DNA was not changed by EB treatment at the concentrations below 2.5 µg/ml (Fig. 1B); the cells could not grow at EB concentrations over 6 µg/ml.

Time Course Analysis of Transcription of Nuclear and Mitochondrial Genes in EB-treated Cells-- We examined the temporal profiles of mitochondrial transcription and insulin secretion 1-6 days after the addition of EB. On days 4-6, the growth of EB-treated cells was significantly retarded (see below). On days 3-6, mitochondrial transcription levels of the control cells were enhanced, whereas those of EB-treated cells were inhibited by 80-90% compared with control cells (Fig. 2). In contrast, transcription of the insulin gene showed little change between treated and untreated cells (Fig. 2). Expression of "housekeeping" genes also seemed to be unaffected by EB treatment, when the messenger RNA of beta -actin was assessed on day 0, 2, 4, and 6 by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction using the Mouse beta -Actin Control Amplimer Set (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA) (data not shown). Analysis by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction of cells treated with EB for 6 days also showed that transcription of major glucose-sensing enzymes, GK and HK-I, was not altered significantly (data not shown). In accord with this, glucose-phosphorylating activities by HK and GK were not changed between EB-treated and control cells on day 4 (Fig. 3).


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Time course analysis of mitochondrial transcription during EB treatment. beta HC9 cells were plated in a 10-cm dish at a density of 3 × 104/cm2 and cultured overnight, and then 0.4 µg/ml EB was added. After this addition, total RNA was isolated from each dish at the indicated time. Northern blot hybridization (20 µg of the total RNA) was performed as described in the legend for Fig. 1. Mouse mitochondrial DNA probe was used first, and the membrane was then rehybridized with rat insulin I cDNA. In the Mt panel, 12 S products are presented.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Glucose phosphorylating activities by HK and GK (Vmax). The solid bars denote control cells, and open bars represent EB-treated cells (0.4 µg/ml for 4 days). Values are expressed in mol kg DNA-1 h -1, as mean ± S.D. (n = 3) from a single representative experiment.

Electron Microscopic Analysis-- On electron microscopic analysis (Fig. 4), beta HC9 cells contained electron-dense secretory granules in their cytoplasm, which probably represented insulin-containing granules, because fluorescence microscopy of anti-insulin antibody to these cells revealed fine granular staining in the cytoplasm (data not shown). Although dead or damaged cells were occasionally seen after EB treatment, most of the cells looked morphologically intact, as also shown by phase-contrast microscopy (data not shown). The only prominent finding observed in these cells was the frequent appearance of ring- or cup- shaped mitochondria (Fig. 4A). No changes were found in other organelles including Golgi apparatus or dense core granules.


View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Electron microscopic analysis. Electron micrographs of EB-treated (0.4 µg/ml) (A) and control (B) beta HC9 cells on day 4 are shown. Electron dense secretory granules (arrows) were seen in both cells. In the EB-treated cells, ring- or cup-shaped mitochondria were frequently observed (A, lower center), which were not seen in control cells. N, nucleus; M, mitochondria; L, lysosome; r, ribosome; arrow, secretory granule; arrowhead, microtubule; scale bar, 1 µm.

Time Course Analysis of Insulin Secretion in EB-treated Cells-- Basal insulin secretion (0.1 mM glucose) of the control cells maintained a constant low level during cell proliferation. The stimulatory effect of glucose (20 mM) on insulin secretion was gradually increased, and the maximal effect was observed on day 6 (confluency had reached 70-90% at this time). A similar temporal profile to that of glucose-induced insulin secretion was observed with glibenclamide (1 µM)-stimulated insulin release (Fig. 5A). In contrast, in EB-treated cells, glucose-stimulated insulin release was completely abolished by day 5-6, although the stimulatory effect of glibenclamide was still observed (Fig. 5B). The insulin content of EB-treated cells was higher than those of the control cells (tested on days 4 and 6; Table II). In addition, glucose-phosphorylating activity by either HK or GK was unchanged between EB-treated and control cells (on day 4; Fig. 3). Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis of these two enzymes of the cells treated with EB for 6 days showed similar expression levels to those of control cells (data not shown).


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Time course analysis of insulin secretion with secretagogues. beta HC9 cells were plated in a 12-well dish at a density of 3 × 104/cm2 and cultured overnight, and then incubated with (B) or without (A) 0.4 µg/ml EB, as described under "Experimental Procedures." After cultivation for the indicated time, insulin secretion stimulated by 20 mM glucose or 1 µM glibenclamide for 2 h was measured. Data presented are mean ± S.D. (n = 3).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Insulin content and fractional secretion from EB-treated and control beta HC9 cells
beta HC9 cells were plated in a 12-well dish at a density of 3 × 104/cm2 and cultured overnight, and then 0.4 µg/ml EB was added. After cultivation for the indicated time, insulin was extracted with 74% ethanol and 1.4% concentrated HCl from the cells, and insulin content was measured. Means ± S.D. of triplicate observations in a single representative experiment are shown here. In the parentheses are given the -fold increases.

To examine the effects of EB treatment on glucose responsiveness in more detail, we evaluated the concentration-response characteristics of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion after 6 days of EB treatment. As shown in Fig. 6 and Table II, increase in basal secretion and decrease in stimulated release both contributed to the loss of -fold increase by the treatment. Fig. 6 also shows that half-maximal effect of glucose on insulin secretion was achieved at 10-15 mM.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Insulin secretory response to glucose of the EB-treated and control beta HC9 cells. Secretion from beta HC9 cells by various concentrations of glucose was evaluated after 6-day treatment by EB (0.4 µg/ml) as described under "Experimental Procedures." Means ± S.D. of triplicate observations in a single representative experiment are shown here. Solid line, control cells; broken line, EB-treated cells.

Although glucose responsiveness and insulin content of the beta HC9 cell line underwent some changes over different passages (see Ref. 18, Table II, and Fig. 6), the loss or decrease of glucose-stimulated insulin release due to EB treatment was absolutely reproducible in more than 50 experiments ranging over more than 15 passages, while there was no decrease in the responsiveness to glibenclamide. The effect of EB on insulin content was also observed by the same treatment repeatedly.

Reversible Change of Mitochondrial Transcription and Properties of Insulin Secretion-- After 3 days of treatment with EB, cells were returned to EB-free culture medium, and mitochondrial transcription and insulin secretion were examined. As described earlier, mitochondrial transcription of cells treated with EB for 3 days was only 10-20% of that of the control cells. After removal of EB from the medium, mitochondrial transcription was slightly raised after 1 day and restored at 2 days (Fig. 7). The transcription levels of the insulin and beta -actin genes were increased 2-3-fold on days 2-5. Importantly, the effects on insulin secretion by glucose started to recover 3 days after the removal of EB and were completely reversed in 5-7 days (at 70-90% confluency), i.e. both the basal level of insulin secretion and the stimulatory effect of glucose (20 mM) were normal, i.e. similar to control cells on days 5 and 7 (Figs. 5A and 8). This 3-day delay in recovery could be attributable to the time course of restoration of mitochondrial transcription (see "Discussion"). Mitochondrial transcription and insulin secretion by glucose were also restored when EB was removed after 6 days of EB treatment (Fig. 8; data for transcription not shown). This reversible change in insulin secretion was also observed with a later passage (passage 29) as shown in Table III.


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Reversible mitochondrial transcriptional change by EB treatment. beta HC9 cells were plated in a 10-cm dish at a density of 3 × 104/cm2 and cultured overnight, and then EB at indicated concentrations was added. After cultivation for 3 days, the medium was replaced by EB-free medium, and the total RNA was prepared at the indicated time. Northern blot hybridization (20 µg of the total RNA) was performed as described in the legend for Fig. 1. Mouse mitochondrial DNA probe was used first and then the membrane was rehybridized with rat insulin I cDNA plus human beta -actin cDNA. 12 S products are shown for the transcription of mitochondrial DNA. The left lane shows the total RNA from control cells cultured for 3 days.


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Reversible change of insulin secretory characteristics. beta HC9 cells were plated in a 12-well dish at a density of 3 × 104/cm2 and cultured overnight, and then 0.4 µg/ml EB was added. After cultivation for 3 or 6 days, the medium was replaced by EB-free medium and subsequently cultured for the indicated time. Control cells (day 0) were cultured for 3 days without EB. Insulin secretion stimulated by 20 mM glucose or 1 µM glibenclamide for 2 h was measured. Data presented are mean ± S.D. (n = 3).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III
Reversibility of the changes caused by EB after its removal at passage 29 
Secretion from beta HC9 cells by glucose and glibenclamide was evaluated as described under "Experimental Procedures" after 6-day treatment by EB (0.4 µg/ml) and further culture in normal medium for 6 days after its removal. Means ± S.D. of nine observations in combined two experiments for 6-day EB treatment and five observations in a single representative experiment are shown here.

Changes in [Ca2+]i-- Changes in the [Ca2+]i in response to 20 mM glucose or 1 µM glibenclamide were examined in control and EB-treated cells using fura-2 as the indicator (Fig. 9). As shown in Fig. 9, the growth of EB-treated cells was significantly retarded compared with the control cells on day 6. 


View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   The changes in [Ca2+]i incubated with glucose or glibenclamide. beta HC9 cells were plated on a glass coverslip in a 6-cm diameter dish at a density of 3 × 104/cm2 and cultured overnight, and then 0.4 µg/ml EB was added. After cultivation for 6 days, [Ca2+]i was measured with fura-2 after stimulation by 20 mM glucose or 1 µM glibenclamide for 15 min. The mean Ca2+ concentration of all of the cells displayed was calculated in a pixel-by-pixel manner and is shown under each panel. In addition, correlation of pseudocolor and Ca2+ concentration is indicated at the right. Upper panels show the control cells, and lower panels show the EB-treated cells. A and D, 0.1 mM glucose (basal); B and E, 20 mM glucose; C and F, 1 µM glibenclamide.

In control cells that were cultured for 7 days and reached 70-90% confluency, [Ca2+]i (the mean value for the cellular area) increased up to ~150 nM after a 15-min stimulation by 20 mM glucose. A similar increase was observed with the stimulation by 1 µM glibenclamide for 15 min. In cells cultured with EB for 6 days, the basal [Ca2+]i was significantly lower than that of the control cells (61 ± 10 versus 90 ± 16 nM, p < 0.05 by Student's t test; both values from five independent observations); the increase induced by 20 mM glucose in the control cells was not seen in the EB-treated cells, whereas that due to 1 µM glibenclamide was similar to that of the control cells. These results were reproducible in three independent experiments. Similar results were obtained during 30-min stimulation by 20 mM glucose or 1 µM glibenclamide. Restoration of the [Ca2+]i response to glucose by removal of EB after a 3-day treatment was also verified.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Although the importance of ATP for glucose signaling in the stimulation of insulin secretion has been proved by electrophysiological techniques, only a few reports, including one report (18) from one of our laboratories, have clearly shown the role of the mitochondrion, the ATP-producing organelle, in this pathway. In the present study, we have modulated (reduced) mitochondrial transcription and hence mitochondrial function by EB treatment and have investigated the effect of this on glucose-regulated insulin secretion in the beta -cell line, beta HC9. This cell line, established from the hyperplastic stage of pancreatic islets of transgenic mice expressing SV40 large T antigen in their beta -cells (15), synthesized and secreted insulin in response to glucose and other stimuli. Furthermore, the half-maximal glucose concentration for insulin secretion was 10-15 mM, similar to that of normal islets, indicating that this cell line retains the innate glucose-signaling pathway of normal beta -cells (17).

Inhibitors of oxidative phosphorylation such as sodium azide, antimycin A, rotenone, cyanide, and iodoacetamide have been used to study the role of mitochondrial function in insulin secretion and intracellular Ca2+ handling (33-35). These studies suggest the importance of mitochondrial function both for the stimulation of insulin secretion and for the increase in [Ca2+]i. Unfortunately, the inhibitors possess strong cytotoxicity, and thus the inhibitory effects are irreversible. Therefore, inhibition of insulin secretion by these compounds provides only limited evidence for the role of mitochondrial function for insulin secretion.

One of our laboratories established a rho 0 system introduced into another insulin-secreting cell line, MIN6, and demonstrated that mitochondrial function is indispensable for glucose-induced insulin release (18). In the current report, we not only showed that glucose-induced insulin release and [Ca2+]i rise were decreased in EB-treated cells but also demonstrated that neither of them was decreased when glibenclamide was used as the stimulus. Additionally, we showed by electron microscopy that morphological changes were specifically located in the mitochondria; i.e. electron microscopic analyses demonstrated the presence of secretory granules and normal mitochondria in the control beta HC9 cells; changes in the EB-treated cells were only found in mitochondria, not in other cellular components such as nuclei, endoplasmic reticula, Golgi bodies, or secretory granules. These results are consistent with an action of EB specifically on the mitochondria. We also demonstrated that reversibility of changes in mitochondrial gene transcription, insulin secretion, and [Ca2+]i rise upon removal of the EB.

EB has been established as a useful tool for the study of extrachromosomal genetic components because it specifically inhibits their transcription and subsequently replication by deleting RNA primers required for initiating replication (19-21, 24). In this report, we have demonstrated that in beta HC9 cells, EB is also able to inhibit the transcription of mitochondrial genes without suppressing that of chromosomal genes, e.g. insulin (Fig. 2), glucokinase, and beta -actin genes; we also showed that glucokinase and hexokinase activities were unchanged by EB treatment. In addition, the results in Table II show that synthesis of insulin is even enhanced in the EB-treated cells compared with the control cells. One possible explanation for this phenomenon is an enhanced posttranslational mechanism(s), since long term exposure to high glucose has been reported to elevate insulin biosynthesis, which outgrows the increase in mRNA content of insulin (36). In EB-treated cells, possible elevated glucose 6-phosphate levels, as a result of unchanged GK and HK activities and suppressed mitochondrial function, might well affect this level of regulation of insulin biosynthesis, since similar phenomena were reported in other cell types (37, 38). The inhibitory effect of EB on mitochondrial transcription was preceded by its effect on mitochondrial replication (Fig. 2), suggesting that the remaining transcription level (10-20%) was enough to maintain mitochondrial replication.

When EB was removed, all of the changes induced by the treatment (cell growth, insulin secretory profiles, and Ca2+ dynamics) were reversed, along with the restoration of mitochondrial transcription. This suggests that the changes observed during this treatment were due to mitochondrial dysfunction and that the treatment caused no irreversible effects on chromosomal genes. In fact, recovery of the insulin secretory profile was in good accord with the restoration of mitochondrial transcription. As shown in Fig. 7, it needed 2 days for the mitochondrial transcription to recover fully, and the secretory response to glucose started to recover 1 day later (Fig. 8). This 1-day delay might well be due to the time required for protein synthesis following the recovery of mitochondrial transcription.

During treatment with 0.4 µg/ml EB for 6 days, the growth of beta HC9 cells was retarded. This contrasts with the previous report by King and Attardi (22) that rho 0 cells lacking mitochondrial DNA, derived from the human osteosarcoma cell line 143B, did not show growth inhibition compared with the parent cells when pyruvate and uridine were supplemented in the medium. Although the reason for this difference is unclear, one possible explanation could be that beta HC9 cells (and possibly normal beta -cells) are more "fragile" and sensitive to ATP depletion than cells of other types like osteosarcoma cells. In fact, we recently found that pancreata from patients with a mutation of mitochondrial DNA at the position of base pair 3243 showed a lower number of islet cells and exhibited their atrophy (predominantly beta -cells), which may contribute to the pathogenesis of diabetes mellitus of such subjects.2

In the current study, the [Ca2+]i was increased in the control cells by 20 mM glucose. This increase was lost in EB-treated cells and was restored after removal of EB. In this series of experiments, glucose-induced increase in [Ca2+]i was well associated with glucose responsiveness in insulin secretion. In contrast, 1 µM glibenclamide increased the [Ca2+]i in EB-treated cells to a similar extent as in control cells. These results indicate the involvement of mitochondrial function in the glucose-stimulated Ca2+ increase and subsequent insulin release, compatible with the current model that ATP generated from glucose in mitochondria is the key component in glucose-stimulated insulin release, acting upon ATP-sensitive K+ channels and subsequent activation of voltage-dependent calcium channels in beta -cells (2, 39, 40).

The lack of response to glucose in EB-treated cells appears not to be due to the decreased expression of GK, which has been suggested to underlie the left shift of the dose-responsive curve of glucose-regulated insulin secretion in several beta -cell lines (15, 41) and also in pancreatic islets (42). In EB-treated beta HC9 cells, however, glucose-phosphorylating activities by HK or GK as well as expression levels of these enzymes were unchanged (Fig. 3). Regarding the glucokinase activity in this cell line, Liang et al. (16) reported that the Vmax value of its activity of beta HC9 cells was 10 times higher than that of hexokinase (in supernatant of homogenates), and the present study showed equal activities of these two enzymes (in sonicates). In this regard, it should be mentioned that the same laboratory (43) reported similar activities of glucokinase and hexokinase in sonicates of rat islets, whereas the former activity was less than half of the latter in the supernatant of the homogenates. This could be ascribed to the difference in the distribution between supernatant and sonicates of the two enzymes. In addition, 3-O-methyl-N-acetylglucosamine used to stabilize the assay by suppressing the perturbation by N-acetylglucosamine kinase (29, 43) might have affected glucokinase activity. In our hands, beta HC9 cell glucokinase activity increases by 25% when measured without this compound.3

On day 6 when mitochondrial transcription was decreased to ~10%, the basal level of insulin secretion was enhanced (Fig. 5). This could be explained in part by the increase in insulin content as described earlier. It may also be due to decreased intercellular contact as a result of occasional loss of cells, for a decrease in cell-to-cell interaction has been proved in islets to cause elevation of the basal level of insulin secretion (44). This would agree well with the gradually decreasing basal secretion in the control cells along with the cell proliferation (Fig. 5A).

Other possibilities to be considered include the possibility that the basal level of [Ca2+]i might be increased (due to impaired activity of the Ca-ATPase pump, for example), which could contribute to the accelerated insulin secretion at low glucose levels; but, as shown in Fig. 9 and as described under "Results," the basal [Ca2+]i level was lower in EB-treated cells than in control cells. Next, we considered that activation of the "immature" or constitutive secretory pathway with relative suppression of the regulatory pathway might be associated with the high basal secretion. Therefore, we measured the proinsulin/insulin ratio in the medium of the EB-treated and control cells on day 6 by high performance liquid chromatography analysis; the elevation of this ratio could be attributable to relative activation of constitutive secretion. The results showed no significant increase in the ratio for the cells deficient in mitochondrial function (data not shown), suggesting that impairment of the regulatory pathway is little or none in EB-treated cells. Third, this increase in basal secretion might also be due to defective energy production resulting from low (0.1 mM) glucose incubation; however, fractional secretions at glucose concentrations of 2.5 and 5.0 mM, known to maintain cellular energy production, were also raised in EB-treated cells compared with control cells (Fig. 6). Finally, the decreased mitochondrial volume in EB-treated cells (Fig. 4) may be associated with some changes in intracellular distribution of substances related to insulin secretion such as long-chain acyl-CoA (45), which is believed to be stored for the most part in mitochondria (46). In any case, both an enhanced level of insulin secretion and a loss of glucose responsiveness in EB-treated cells are correlated to mitochondrial dysfunction, since these characteristics were completely restored after EB removal. Thus, mitochondrial function might have some additional, unknown correlation to insulin secretion in beta -cells other than its effects on ATP-sensitive K+ channels (47).

In conclusion, we have developed a unique system to study the role of mitochondrial function in insulin secretion. In our experience, EB rarely failed to exert an effect on insulin secretion. In this regard, this approach is both reproducible and reversible. These characteristics make the method useful for studying the mechanisms of insulin secretion, especially in relation to mitochondrial (dys)function. Our results presented here as well as the previous report (18) with a rho 0 system in MIN6 cells demonstrate the necessity of mitochondrial function for glucose-stimulated insulin release. Our data clearly show that mitochondrial function is essential for glucose signaling for insulin secretion through generating an increase in [Ca2+]i with possible interplay with some other unknown mechanisms. Moreover, the present report is the first to demonstrate a reversible change, upon removal of the agent suppressing mitochondrial transcription. Our results show that 80-90% inhibition of transcription of mitochondrial DNA is enough to cause a similar change to rho 0 cells in terms of glucose-stimulated insulin release and [Ca2+]i rise, which provides practical convenience and usefulness as an experimental system for mitochondrial dysfunction studies. It negates the need to maintain the rho 0 cell line or to verify the complete absence of mitochondrial gene products. In addition, a variety of degrees of mitochondrial dysfunction can be induced by changing the duration of EB treatment. Finally, it should be pointed out that the system described here should also serve as a useful tool for investigating the role of mitochondrial function and dysfunction in cell lines of other origin.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to Dr. D. Hanahan (University of California, San Francisco) for kindly providing beta HC9 cells. We also thank Dr. Keiji Iwamoto (University of Tokyo) for critical reading of this manuscript and helpful discussions.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

b Present address: Pharmaceutical Research Laboratories II, Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd., 2-17-85 Juso-honmachi, Yodogawa-ku, Osaka 532, Japan.

c These authors contributed equally to this work.

g To whom correspondence should be addressed: Third Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113, Japan. Tel.: 81-3-3815-5411 (ext. 3111); Fax: 81-3-5689-7209.

The abbreviations used are: EB, ethidium bromide; BSA, bovine serum albumin; GK, glucokinase; HK, hexokinase.

2 S. Otabe and T. Kadowaki, unpublished observation.

3 I. Miwa, unpublished data.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Wallace, D. C. (1992) Science 256, 628-632[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Ashcroft, F. M., and Ashcroft, S. J. H. (1992) in Insulin: Molecular Biology to Pathology (Ashcroft, F. M., and Ashcroft, S. J. H., eds), pp. 97-150, Oxford University Press, Oxford
  3. Cook, D. L., and Hales, C. N. (1984) Nature 311, 271-273[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Dunne, M. J., and Petersen, O. H. (1991) Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1071, 67-82[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Inagaki, N., Gonoi, T., Clement, J. P., IV, Namba, N., Inazawa, J., Gonzalez, G., Auguilar-Bryan, L., Seino, S., and Bryan, J. (1995) Science 270, 1166-1170[Abstract]
  6. Sakura, H., Ämmälä, C., Smith, P. A., Gribble, F. M., and Ashcroft, F. M. (1995) FEBS Lett. 377, 338-344[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Lenzen, S., Formanek, H., and Panten, U. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 6631-6633[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Lenzen, S., Schmidt, W., Rustenbeck, I., and Panten, U. (1986) Biosci. Rep. 6, 163-169[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Ballinger, S. W., Shoffner, J. M., Hedaya, E. V., Trounce, I., Polak, M. A., Koontz, D. A., and Wallace, D. C. (1992) Nat. Genet. 1, 11-15[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. van den Ouweland, J. M. W., Lemkes, H. H. P. J., Ruitenbeek, W., Sandkuijl, L. A., de Vijlder, M. F., Struyvenberg, P. A. A., van de Kamp, J. J. P., and Maassen, J. A. (1992) Nat. Genet. 1, 368-371[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Kadowaki, H., Tobe, K., Mori, Y., Sakura, H., Sakuta, R., Nonaka, I., Hagura, R., Yazaki, Y., Akanuma, Y., and Kadowaki, T. (1993) Lancet 341, 893-894
  12. Kadowaki, T., Kadowaki, H., Mori, Y., Tobe, K., Sakuta, R., Suzuki, Y., Tanabe, Y, Sakura, H., Awata, T., Goto, Y., Hayakawa, T., Matsuoka, K., Kawamori, R., Kamada, T., Horai, S., Nonaka, I., Hagura, R., Akanuma, Y., and Yazaki, Y. (1994) N. Engl. J. Med. 330, 962-968[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Hess, J. F., Parisi, M. A., Bennet, J. L., and Clayton, D. A. (1991) Nature 351, 236-239[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Chomyn, A., Martinuzzi, A., Yoneda, M., Daga, A., Hurko, O., Johns, D., Lai, S. T., Nonaka, I., Angelini, C., and Attardi, G. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 4221-4225[Abstract]
  15. Radvanyi, F., Christgau, S., Baekkeskov, S., Jolicoeur, C., and Hanahan, D. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 4223-4232[Abstract]
  16. Liang, Y., Bai, G., Doliba, N., Buettger, C., Wang, L., Berner, D. K., and Matschinsky, F. M. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 270, E846-E857[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Noda, M., Komatsu, M., and Sharp, G. W. G. (1996) Diabetes 45, 1766-1773[Abstract]
  18. Soejima, A., Inoue, K., Takai, D., Kaneko, M., Ishihara, H., Oka, Y., and Hayashi, J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 26194-26199[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Zybler, E., Vesco, C., and Penman, S. (1969) J. Mol. Biol. 44, 195-204[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Hayakawa, T., Tanaka, T., Sakaguchi, K., Otake, N., and Yonehara, H. (1979) J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 25, 255-260
  21. Desjardins, P., Frost, E., and Morais, R. (1985) Mol. Cell. Biol. 5, 1163-1169[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. King, M. P., and Attardi, G. (1989) Science 246, 500-503[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Hayashi, J., Ohta, S., Kikuchi, A., Takemitsu, M., Goto, Y., and Nonaka, I. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 10614-10618[Abstract]
  24. Hayashi, J., Tanaka, M., Sato, W., Ozawa, T., Yonekawa, H., Kagawa, Y., and Ohta, S. (1990) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 167, 216-221[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Bibb, M. J., van Etten, R. A., Wright, C. T., Walberg, M. W., and Clayton, D. A. (1981) Cell 26, 167-180[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  27. Cordell, B., Bell, G., Tischer, E., DeNoto, F. M., Ullrich, A., Pictet, R., Rutter, W. J., and Goodman, H. M. (1979) Cell 18, 533-543[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Gunning, P., Ponte, P., Okayama, H., Engel, J., Blau, H., and Kedes, L. (1983) Mol. Cell. Biol. 3, 787-795[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Miwa, I., Mita, Y., Murata, T., Okuda, J., Sugiura, M., Hamada, Y., and Chiba, T. (1995) Enzyme Protein 48, 135-142
  30. Terauchi, Y., Sakura, H., Yasuda, K., Iwamoto, K., Takahashi, N., Ito, K., Kasai, H., Suzuki, H., Ueda, O., Kamada, N., Jishage, K., Komeda, K., Noda, M., Kanazawa, Y., Taniguchi, S., Miwa, I., Akanuma, Y., Kodama, T., Yazaki, Y., and Kadowaki, T. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 30253-30256[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J. (1951) J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265-275[Free Full Text]
  32. Grynkiewicz, G., Poenie, M., and Tsien, R. Y. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 3440-3450[Abstract]
  33. MacDonald, M. J., and Fahien, L. A. (1990) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 279, 104-108[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Misler, S., Barnett, D. W., and Falke, L. C. (1992) Eur. J. Physiol. 421, 289-291[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Sakurada, M., Kanatsuka, A., Saitoh, T., Makino, H., Yamamura, K., Miyazaki, J-I., Kikuchi, M., and Yoshida, S. (1993) Endocrinology 132, 2659-2665[Abstract]
  36. Welsh, M., Nielsen, D. A., MacKrell, A. J., and Steiner, D. F. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 13590-13594[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Foufelle, F., Gouhot, B., Pegorier, J-P., Perdereau, D., Girard, J., and Ferre, P. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 20543-20546[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Brun, T., Roche, E., Kim, K-H., and Prentki, M. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 18905-18911[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Misler, S., Falke, L. C., Gillis, K., and McDaniel, M. L. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 7119-7123[Abstract]
  40. Tsuura, Y., Ishida, H., Okamoto, Y., Kato, S., Sakamoto, K., Horie, M., Ikeda, H., Okada, Y., and Seino, Y. (1993) Diabetes 42, 1446-1453[Abstract]
  41. Efrat, S., Leiser, M., Surana, M., Tal, M., Fusco-Demane, D., and Fleischer, N. (1993) Diabetes 42, 901-907[Abstract]
  42. Hosokawa, H., Hosokawa, Y. A., and Leahy, J. L. (1995) Diabetes 44, 1328-1333[Abstract]
  43. Trus, M. D., Zawalich, W. S., Burch, P. T., Berner, D., K., Weill, V. A., and Matschinsky, F. M. (1981) Diabetes 30, 911-922[Abstract]
  44. Meda, P., Bosco, D., Chanson, M., Giordano, E., Vallar, L., Wollheim, C., and Orci, L. (1990) J. Clin. Invest. 86, 759-768[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Prentki, M., Vischer, S., Glennon, M. C., Regazzi, R., Deeney, J. T., and Corkey, B. E. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 5802-5810[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Idell-Wenger, J. A., Grotyohann, L. W., and Neely, J. R. (1978) J. Biol. Chem. 253, 4310-4318[Abstract]
  47. Maechler, P., Kennedy, E. D., Pozzan, T., and Wollheim, C. B. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 3833-3841[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.