GTPase Activating Specificity of RGS12 and Binding Specificity of an Alternatively Spliced PDZ (PSD-95/Dlg/ZO-1) Domain*

Bryan E. SnowDagger , Randy A. Hall§, Andrejs M. Krumins, Greg M. BrothersDagger , Denis BouchardDagger , Carol Anne BrothersDagger , Stephen ChungDagger , Joan MangionDagger , Alfred G. Gilman, Robert J. Lefkowitz§, and David P. Siderovskiparallel

From the Dagger  Amgen Institute, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C1, Canada, the § Departments of Medicine and Biochemistry, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, and the  Department of Pharmacology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235-9041

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

Regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins increase the intrinsic guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) activity of G-protein alpha  subunits in vitro, but how specific G-protein-coupled receptor systems are targeted for down-regulation by RGS proteins remains uncharacterized. Here, we describe the GTPase specificity of RGS12 and identify four alternatively spliced forms of human RGS12 mRNA. Two RGS12 isoforms of 6.3 and 5.7 kilobases (kb), encoding both an N-terminal PDZ (PSD-95/Dlg/ZO-1) domain and the RGS domain, are expressed in most tissues, with highest levels observed in testis, ovary, spleen, cerebellum, and caudate nucleus. The 5.7-kb isoform has an alternative 3' end encoding a putative C-terminal PDZ domain docking site. Two smaller isoforms, of 3.1 and 3.7 kb, which lack the PDZ domain and encode the RGS domain with and without the alternative 3' end, respectively, are most abundantly expressed in brain, kidney, thymus, and prostate. In vitro biochemical assays indicate that RGS12 is a GTPase-activating protein for Gi class alpha  subunits. Biochemical and interaction trap experiments suggest that the RGS12 N terminus acts as a classical PDZ domain, binding selectively to C-terminal (A/S)-T-X-(L/V) motifs as found within both the interleukin-8 receptor B (CXCR2) and the alternative 3' exon form of RGS12. The presence of an alternatively spliced PDZ domain within RGS12 suggests a mechanism by which RGS proteins may target specific G-protein-coupled receptor systems for desensitization.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

The mammalian "regulators of G-protein signaling" (RGS)1 gene family was first identified by sequence and functional similarity to fungal and nematode genes captured in genetic screens for negative regulators of specific G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signals (1-3). In vitro biochemical analyses soon established that this gene family encodes potent accelerators ("GAPs") of the intrinsic GTP hydrolysis activity of G-protein alpha  subunits, revealing a molecular mechanism by which RGS proteins drive G-proteins into their inactive GDP-bound form and hence down-regulate GPCR signal transduction in vivo (reviewed in Refs. 4 and 5). However, the mechanisms by which individual RGS proteins desensitize pathways activated by particular GPCRs remain to be elucidated. Tightly regulated transcription has been described for RGS1 (3), RGS2 (6), and RGS3-RGS11 (7), and palmitoylation of the cysteine-rich N terminus of Galpha -interacting protein (GAIP) has also been observed (8); however, transcriptional regulation and post-translational modifications of particular RGS family members can each only be expected to afford a gross level of intracellular control over the temporal and spatial expression of Galpha -directed GAP activity.

We and others have hypothesized that regions outside the RGS fold contribute to regulation of Galpha GAP activity and/or targeting of individual RGS proteins to particular receptor signaling pathways (4, 5, 9, 10). Here, we report the GAP activity of RGS12 and identify a PDZ-like N-terminal sequence within two splice forms. PDZ domains are protein-protein interaction modules that bind to three or four amino acid motifs at the extreme carboxyl termini of target proteins (reviewed in Ref. 11). PDZ domains of many proteins localize enzymatic activities and other protein-protein interaction domains to specific submembranous regions. Members of the PSD-93/95 protein family cluster NMDA receptors, nitric oxide synthase activity, and Shaker K+ channels at neuronal synapses (12). The protein tyrosine phosphatase FAP-1 interacts via a PDZ domain with the C terminus of CD95, receptor of the apoptosis-inducing Fas ligand (13). Most recently, the five-PDZ domain-containing protein InaD was shown to organize the G-protein-coupled phototransduction machinery in Drosophila, with individual PDZ domains binding to phospholipase C, transient receptor potential ion channel, and protein kinase C subunits (14). Using yeast two-hybrid, surface plasmon resonance, and protein overlay analyses, we demonstrate specific binding of the RGS12 PDZ domain to C-terminal (A/S)-T-X-(L/V) motifs. Our findings suggest that, by virtue of an alternatively spliced N terminus, specific isoforms of RGS12 may localize in vivo to site(s) of specific G-protein-coupled signaling complexes. In addition, affinity of the RGS12 PDZ domain for an alternatively spliced C-terminal motif within RGS12 itself presents the possibility of RGS12 autoregulation by intra- and/or intermolecular association.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

Cloning of Human RGS12-- Oligonucleotides flanking both the open reading frame (sense primer 5'-ATATGGCTCCAAGGGAACAATGAGACG-3' and antisense primer 5'-TACGGGGCCAAGGTGGAGGGATCAG-3') and 3'-UTR of hRGS12 (sense primer 5'-ATCCCTCCACCTTGGCCCCGTAAGC-3' and antisense primer 5'-CTGCTGGGAGCCTCGCCTCAGTTTC-3') were designed based on cosmid sequences (9) and used to amplify the hRGS12 cDNA from 0.5 ng of Marathon-ReadyTM human brain cDNA (CLONTECH) using the ExpandTM long template PCR system (Boehringer Mannheim) as described previously for hRGS16 (15). The resulting PCR products were then cloned and sequenced as described previously (15).

Protein Expression and Purification-- cDNA fragments from rat RGS12 encoding amino acids 1-94 and 664-885, and from human RGS12 encoding amino acids 1-110, were each amplified by PCR, cloned into the GST fusion vector pGEX4T3 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), sequenced, and transformed into Escherichia coli strain BL21 (Stratagene). Expression of GST-rRGS12-(1-94), GST-rRGS12-(664-885), and GST-hRGS12-(1-110) fusion proteins was induced with 0.8 mM isopropyl-beta -D-thiogalactopyranoside for 4 h at 37 °C in bacterial cultures at an OD600 nm of 0.7. Cells were lysed by lysozyme treatment and sonication in lysis buffer (50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, and protease inhibitors) and cleared by centrifugation at 27,000 × g for 30 min. Supernatant was passed through a glutathione-Sepharose column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) pre-equilibrated with lysis buffer and the column was washed with lysis buffer and eluted with 10 mM glutathione in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0. Eluted proteins were dialyzed against storage buffer (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT, 150 mM NaCl), concentrated by ultrafiltration, and stored at -80 °C.

cDNA fragments from rat RGS12 encoding amino acids 1-440, 440-1108, and 1-1387 were each amplified by PCR, cloned into the thioredoxin-hexahistidine tag (Trx) fusion vector pET32b (Invitrogen), sequenced, and transformed into E. coli strain BL21(DE3) (Stratagene). Expression of Trx-rRGS12-(1-440), Trx-rRGS12-(440-1108), and Trx-rRGS12-(1-1387) was induced with 0.8 mM isopropyl-beta -D-thiogalactopyranoside for 8 h at 26 °C. Cells were lysed as above in Trx-lysis buffer (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 100 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, 10% glycerol, 5 mM beta -mercaptoethanol, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, and protease inhibitors). Cell lysate was cleared by centrifugation and the supernatant was passed through nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid resin (Qiagen). The resin was washed with Trx-lysis buffer, and the hexahistidine-tagged fusion proteins were eluted using an imidazole concentration gradient and dialyzed against storage buffer.

GTPase Assays-- G-protein alpha  subunits Gsalpha , myr-Gialpha 1, and myr-Goalpha were expressed and purified as described elsewhere (16). A point mutant of Gqalpha , Arg-183 to Cys, which reduces without abolishing the intrinsic GTPase activity, was purified from Sf9 cells co-infected with Gqalpha (R183C), Gbeta 1, and Ggamma 2 baculoviruses (17). Recombinant RGS4 was purified from E. coli as described previously (18). Purification of recombinant RGS2 from Sf9 cells will be described elsewhere.2

Purified Gqalpha (R183C) was loaded with [gamma -32P]GTP (specific activity 500 cpm/pmol) for 3 h at 20 °C in the following buffer (150 µl final volume): 10 µM GTP, 5.5 mM CHAPS, 50 mM sodium HEPES, pH 7.5, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM EDTA, 0.9 mM MgSO4, 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 30 mM (NH2)2SO4, and 4% glycerol. Other Galpha subunits were loaded in the same manner in the absence of MgSO4; Gsalpha and myr-Goalpha subunits were incubated for 20 min at 20 °C, and myr-Gialpha 1 was incubated for 30 min at 30 °C. Following loading, reaction mixtures were exchanged by Sephadex G-25 chromatography into 1 mM CHAPS, 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM EDTA, 0.9 mM MgSO4, 0.018 mg/ml bovine serum albumin. Protein eluants were then diluted 4-fold in ice-cold OG buffer (0.1% octyl glucopyranoside, 20 mM sodium HEPES pH 7.5, 80 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM EDTA, 0.9 mM MgSO4 (for Gqalpha only), 0.01 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, and 1 mM GTP). GAP activity was initiated by adding Galpha -GTP to RGS protein sample and OG buffer (supplemented with 9 mM MgSO4 when Gsalpha , myr-Goalpha , or myr-Gialpha 1 were used). Timed, 100-µl aliquots were withdrawn and quenched with 900 µl of a 5% (w/v) slurry of Norit A. After centrifugation, 600 µl of supernatant was counted for 32P content.

Northern Blot Analyses-- Human MTN blots (CLONTECH), containing 2 µg of poly(A)+ RNA from multiple adult human tissues and brain regions, were hybridized consecutively with a 686-bp hRGS12 3'-UTR cDNA probe (nucleotides 4185-4870 of GenBank AF035152), a 330-bp cDNA probe spanning the entire PDZ domain (nucleotides 55-384 of GenBank AF035152), and a 350-bp alternative 3'end probe (nucleotides 2441-2790 of GenBank AF030109). Blots were then hybridized with a 1.3-kb fragment of human GAPDH cDNA to correct for RNA loading. Probe labelings and blot hybridizations were performed as described previously (15).

Overlay Assay-- GST-hbeta 2AR tail (80 amino acids) and GST-hCXCR2 tail (40 amino acids) fusion proteins were produced via PCR amplification of the tails and insertion of the PCR products into a pGEX-2T vector (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Mutation to the hCXCR2 tail was induced by the use of a mutant sequence oligonucleotide during PCR and confirmed by sequencing. GST fusion proteins were expressed and purified as described above. GST and GST fusion proteins were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, electroblotted onto nitrocellulose, and incubated with recombinant thioredoxin-rRGS12-(1-440) fusion protein. Bound protein was detected using an anti-thioredoxin mouse monoclonal antibody,3 Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody, and enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

Biosensor Measurements-- Surface plasmon resonance measurements were performed on the BIAcore 2000 (Biacore Inc., Piscataway, NJ). N-terminally biotinylated, synthetic polypeptides were bound to a streptavidin-coated sensor surface (Sensor Chip SA) as per manufacturer's instructions to a density of 300 response units (RU). GST and thioredoxin fusion proteins were 2-fold serially diluted in running buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 3 mM EDTA, 0.005% (v/v) surfactant P20) and injected at a 10 µl/min flow rate; surface regeneration was performed by 10-µl injections of 1 M NaCl in 50 mM NaOH at a 20 µl/min flow rate. Relative binding to test peptides (test) was calculated based on the increase in response units relative to simultaneous measurement of binding to wild-type CXCR2 peptide (wt) and negative control peptide (ctrl) surfaces at 286 s after the start of a 300 s total protein injection: relative binding = (RU286stest - RU286sctrl)/(RU286swt - RU286sctrl).

Yeast Two-hybrid Analysis-- Yeast strain PJ69-4A and the plasmids pAS1 and pACTII have been described (19, 20). Rat RGS12 cDNA (amino acids 1-94) was amplified from rat brain cDNA using PCR, cloned into pCR2.1 (Invitrogen), sequenced, and subcloned in-frame downstream of the Gal4p DNA binding domain (DBD) (amino acids 1-147) in pAS1 using the EcoRI and SalI sites. cDNA encoding amino acids 322-359 of the rat high affinity interleukin-8 receptor B (rCXCR2; Swiss-Prot no. P35407) was amplified from rat brain cDNA using PCR, cloned and sequenced in pCR2.1, and subcloned in-frame downstream of the Gal4p activation domain (AD) (amino acids 768-881) in pACTII using the EcoRI and XhoI sites. Nonsense and missense mutations to the rCXCR2 C-terminal tail were engineered within the pCR2.1 plasmid using QuikChangeTM site-directed mutagenesis (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), sequenced, and subcloned into pACTII as above.

Yeast strain PJ69-4A was co-transformed with pAS1- and pACTII-based plasmids using the Gietz lab transformation kit (Bio/Can Scientific, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) and plated on synthetic complete drop-out medium (SC) lacking tryptophan and leucine (BIO 101, Vista, CA). Six independent yeast colonies from at least two independent transformations were then plated onto SC lacking tryptophan, leucine, histidine, and adenine, supplemented with 2 mM 3-aminotriazole.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

We recently described the cloning of Rgs12 from rat brain using a degenerate PCR strategy directed toward conserved regions of the RGS domain (9). To ascertain whether RGS12 is capable of stimulating the GTPase activity of G-protein alpha  subunits, the conserved RGS domain of rRGS12 (amino acids 664-885) was expressed as a GST fusion protein in E. coli and purified by glutathione-Sepharose chromatography. The ability of GST-rRGS12-(664-885) protein to enhance Galpha GTP hydrolysis was measured in single turnover assays using [gamma -32P]GTP-loaded, recombinant Gialpha 1, Goalpha , Gqalpha , and Gsalpha proteins. The slow rate of GDP dissociation and GTP binding observed for wild-type Gqalpha protein relative to its intrinsic GTPase activity makes it difficult to prepare GTP-Gqalpha for use in single turnover studies (21). Thus, a GTPase-deficient mutant of Gqalpha (R183C) was employed; this protein serves as an adequate substrate for detection of the GAP activities of RGS2 and RGS4.2 The GTPase activities of myr-Gialpha 1 and myr-Goalpha proteins were increased by the addition of GST-rRGS12-(664-885) protein, albeit modestly in comparison to recombinant, full-length RGS4 (Fig. 1, A and B). In contrast, Gsalpha and Gqalpha (R183C) GTPase activities were not enhanced by RGS12 (Fig. 1, C and D). Partially purified preparations of thioredoxin-rRGS12-(1-1387) and thioredoxin-rRGS12-(440-1108) fusion proteins also demonstrated Gialpha 1 and Goalpha GAP activity (data not shown). Based on these in vitro results, we conclude that RGS12 is a bona fide member of the RGS family, in that it acts as a GAP for at least Gi class alpha  subunits.


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Increase in the single turnover GTPase activity of Gialpha subunits by RGS12. A solution containing Mg2+ and indicated concentrations of recombinant GST-rRGS12-(664-885) fusion protein, or control RGS proteins, was added to the following final concentrations of [gamma -32P]GTP-bound Galpha proteins: A, 2.4 nM myr-Gialpha 1; B, 3.25 nM myr-Goalpha ; C, 1.85 nM Gsalpha ; D, 0.105 nM Gqalpha (R183C) proteins. Reactions were performed at 4 °C for A-C and 20 °C for D. Aliquots were taken at the indicated times for measurement of free 32P.

In our initial report of the cloning of rat Rgs12, we also identified the human ortholog (9) within cosmid sequences mapping to human chromosome 4p16.3. PCR was used to amplify both the predicted open-reading frame and 3'-UTR of hRGS12 from human brain cDNA. These two cDNA clones overlapped to form a contiguous sequence encompassing 4870 nucleotides and encoding 1376 amino acids (GenBank AF035152). Comparison of rat and human RGS12 protein sequences previously revealed nearly identical RGS domains and a highly conserved N terminus with similarity to a C-terminal region of mouse rhophilin (9); subsequent sequence and biochemical analyses (see below) indicate that the latter region encodes a PDZ domain. During the cloning of rRgs12 cDNA, we observed an alternatively spliced variant lacking the PDZ domain (GenBank AF035151); an alternative exon 1 with a unique 5'-UTR was found to replace exons 1 and 2 of the longer rRgs12 cDNA (GenBank U92280). Sequence of several human expressed sequence tags suggests that alternative exon usage also occurs in the same position in human RGS12 (e.g. GenBank N31659 and AA455449).

To explore the tissue distribution of human RGS12 mRNA isoforms containing or lacking the PDZ domain region, Northern blot analyses were performed with probes specific to either the 3'-UTR or the PDZ domain. Hybridization of the 3'-UTR cDNA probe to poly(A)+ RNA prepared from various human tissues (Fig. 2A) and brain regions (Fig. 2B) revealed two major hRGS12 transcripts of 6.3 and 3.7 kb. The 6.3-kb transcript was expressed abundantly in spleen, testis, ovary, cerebellum, and caudate nucleus, whereas the 3.7-kb transcript was most abundant in whole brain, kidney, thymus, and prostate, and detected at lower levels in all other tissues examined. Within specific brain regions, the 3.7-kb mRNA was most abundant in the cerebral cortex, occipital pole, frontal lobe, temporal lobe, putamen, amyglada, caudate nucleus, and hippocampus. Hybridizing the same Northern blots with a PDZ domain-specific probe revealed two hRGS12 transcripts of 6.3 and 5.7 kb (Fig. 2, A and B); the absence of hybridization to lower molecular weight mRNA indicates that the 3.7-kb hRGS12 transcript corresponds to an isoform lacking the PDZ domain. The 6.3-kb mRNA detected by the PDZ domain-specific probe corresponds to the size and tissue distribution of the 6.3-kb transcript detected by the 3'-UTR probe. The additional, 5.7-kb transcript was observed in both the same tissue distribution and abundance as seen for the 6.3-kb transcript.


View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Northern blot analyses of four hRGS12 isoforms. Blots of poly(A)+ RNA (2 µg) from various human tissues (A) and brain anatomical features (B) were probed with randomly primed 32P-labeled human RGS12 cDNA fragments corresponding to the 3'-UTR described previously (9), the N-terminal PDZ domain (PDZ), and the alternative 3' exon (Alt 3'-end) described under "Results and Discussion." Blots were then probed with 32P-labeled human GAPDH cDNA (hGAPDH) to assess loading. C, schematic representation of the four hRGS12 transcripts detected by Northern blot analyses. CC, location of predicted coiled-coil heptad repeats previously described (9). ATFV, C-terminal four amino acids encoded by the alternative 3' end.

To determine how the 5.7- and 6.3-kb isoforms differed, the sequence of human RGS12 was compared with the GenBank data base. Alignments to the predicted amino acid sequences of human expressed sequence tags (e.g. GenBank AA523013) and several other hRGS12 cDNA clones (e.g. GenBank AF030109 and AF030111) revealed several isoforms of RGS12 possessing an alternative 3' end. Alternative splicing removes the last four amino acids of RGS12 (GenBank AF035152) and inserts an additional 75 amino acids of open-reading frame and an alternative 3'-UTR. Hybridization of Northern blots with a probe specific for the alternative 3' end detected hRGS12 mRNA of 5.7 and 3.1 kb (Fig. 2A and B), with the size and tissue distribution of the 5.7-kb transcript identical to that detected with the PDZ domain-specific probe. The 3.1-kb isoform was observed to be expressed with the same tissue distribution and abundance as the 3.7-kb isoform. These data indicate the presence of at least four alternatively spliced isoforms of hRGS12, containing or lacking an N-terminal PDZ domain, and encoding one of two alternative C termini (Fig. 2C).

Alternative splicing of the N terminus of human and rat RGS12 suggests that this region may be functionally important. Sequence analysis revealed highest homology of this region to the PDZ domains of the Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor (NHERF; Fig. 3A), a protein that has recently been shown to bind the C-terminal tail of the beta 2-adrenergic receptor (22). Thus, we examined whether RGS12 might also bind the tail of beta 2AR or other G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Full-length and truncated forms of human and rat RGS12 were expressed as GST or thioredoxin fusion proteins and their binding to various peptides was investigated by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analysis. Streptavidin-coated biosensor surfaces were pre-adsorbed with N-terminally biotinylated, synthetic peptides encompassing the last 12 amino acids of various GPCRs. Neither thioredoxin-rRGS12-(1-1387), thioredoxin-rRGS12-(1-440), nor GST-rRGS12-(1-94) fusion proteins bound appreciably to a biosensor surface coated with rat beta 1- or beta 2-adrenergic receptor tail peptides. However, the RGS12 fusion proteins did bind the C terminus of the rat interleukin-8 receptor B (rCXCR2; Fig. 3B and data not shown). GST and thioredoxin proteins alone did not bind any peptide surface tested, whereas full-length NHERF and NHERF domain 1 proteins bound both the rat beta 2AR and CXCR2 tail peptides (data not shown).


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Specific binding of the rat RGS12 PDZ domain to the C terminus of interleukin-8 receptor B (CXCR2) as measured by SPR and protein blot overlay assays. A, sequence similarity between the N-terminal PDZ domain of human RGS12 and PDZ domain 1 of human NHERF. Asterisk denotes conserved histidine residue starting the second alpha -helix (alpha B) of the PDZ fold, previously shown within the PSD-95 PDZ-3/peptide co-crystal structure to interact with threonine at position -2 of the QTSV-COOH peptide binding site (26). B, simultaneous SPR measurement of binding to C-terminal peptides from rat interleukin-8 receptor B (rCXCR2), beta 1- and beta 2-adrenergic receptors (rbeta 1AR, rbeta 2AR), and mouse Notch1 protein (mNotch1) after injection (time 0 s, flow rate 10 µl/min) of 50 µl of 2.5 µM GST-rRGS12-(1-94) fusion protein at 25 °C (see Table II for peptide sequences). C, equal amounts (25 µg) of GST and GST fused to the C termini of human beta 2-adrenergic receptor (hbeta 2AR), interleukin-8 receptor B wild-type (hCXCR2 WT), or a mutant of the interleukin-8 receptor B where the final residue was changed from leucine to alanine (hCXCR2 L360A) were resolved on an SDS-polyacrylamide gel, blotted, and overlaid with thioredoxin-rRGS12-(1-440) fusion protein (50 nM). Bound RGS12 was detected by Western analysis using an anti-thioredoxin monoclonal antibody. The left panel shows a Coomassie stain of the fusion proteins; the right panel shows the binding of RGS12 following a blot overlay experiment. The positions of molecular weight markers are shown on the left.

We tested the C-terminal-specific nature of this interaction in a protein blot overlay using a point mutant of the CXCR2 C-terminal motif. Thioredoxin-rRGS12-(1-440) protein bound a GST-hCXCR2 tail fusion protein in blot overlay experiments but failed to interact with either GST alone or GST-beta 2AR tail (Fig. 3C); mutation of Leu to Ala at the terminal position within the hCXCR2 tail (L360A) abolished all binding. Specificity for the extreme C terminus of CXCR2 was also shown by yeast two-hybrid analysis. Rat RGS12 PDZ domain fused to the Gal4p transcription factor DBD and wild-type or mutated rCXCR2 tails fused to the Gal4p AD were expressed together in a yeast strain containing HIS3 and ADE2 reporter genes under the control of the GAL1 and GAL2 promoters, respectively (19). Growth on selective media lacking both histidine and adenine was compared with a positive control strain co-expressing the strongly interacting yeast proteins Snf1p and Snf4p (23) and a negative control strain co-expressing solely the Gal4p DBD and AD proteins. Co-expression of rRGS12 PDZ domain with wild-type rCXCR2 receptor tail allowed prototrophic growth (Table I); however, truncation of the last five C-terminal amino acids of the rCXCR2 tail (Delta 355-359), or mutation of the -2 or terminal residues, abolished the interaction. Several missense mutations at the -1 position within the rCXCR2 tail did not disrupt the interaction, consistent with previous reports of PDZ domain binding specificity (24).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Yeast two-hybrid analysis of rat RGS12 PDZ domain binding specificity

We were intrigued by the selectivity shown by RGS12 for threonine at the -2 position of the CXCR2 tail, as removal of the Cbeta methyl group by mutation of threonine to serine was observed to abolish completely the interaction in yeast (Table I). To confirm this specificity, we tested three different rat metabotropic glutamate GPCR tails with Ser/Thr-rich carboxyl termini ending in S-(S/T)-L, of which MGR1alpha and MGR5 interact with the PDZ domain of the neuron-specific protein Homer (25). The lack of binding of GST-rRGS12-(1-94) to these three MGR tail peptides, as measured by SPR (Table II, A), confirms the preference of RGS12 for the motif T-X-L versus S-X-L. While necessary, the C-terminal T-X-L motif alone is not the sole determinant of RGS12 PDZ domain binding, as interaction with phospholipase C beta 1 and beta 3 carboxyl termini, both possessing the T-X-L motif, was at least 4-fold weaker than with the CXCR2 tail (Table II, A and B). Alanine/serine scanning mutagenesis of the last six residues of human CXCR2 tail peptide revealed the most important residues for hRGS12 PDZ binding specificity as the -3, -2, and 0 positions (S-T-X-L), with lesser contributions from the -4 and -5 positions (Table II, B). In addition, the failure of GST-hRGS12PDZ-(1-110) to bind amide-blocked C-terminal CXCR2 peptides confirms a critical role for the free carboxylic acid moiety in the binding interaction, as previously observed for other PDZ domains (26).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Surface plasmon resonance analysis of RGS12 PDZ domain binding specificity

The predicted C terminus of the alternative 3' end splice isoform of hRGS12 is similar to that of human CXCR2, with both tails conforming to a consensus of (T/S)-S-(A/G)-H-X-(A/S)-T-X-(L/V). We therefore tested binding of the human RGS12 PDZ domain to synthetic peptides encompassing the last 12 amino acids of the two, alternative carboxyl termini of RGS12. Although no binding was detected to the T-S-R-F C terminus conserved between human and rat RGS12 (hRGS12Tail1; Table II, B), GST-hRGS12PDZ-(1-110) protein was shown to bind the A-T-F-V C-terminal RGS12 peptide (hRGS12Tail2; Table II, B). While a pattern search of the Swiss-Prot data base identified only CXCR2 as terminating with a polypeptide sequence conforming to the (T/S)-S-(A/G)-H-X-(A/S)-T-X-(L/V) motif, several other GPCRs, membrane-spanning proteins, and intracellular proteins with GAP or other enzymatic activities were identified as terminating in the shorter (A/S)-T-X-(L/V) motif. These potential RGS12 PDZ domain-binding proteins and their C-terminal sequences are summarized in Table III. It must be noted, however, that a terminal (A/S)-T-X-(L/V) motif alone is clearly not sufficient to specify RGS12 PDZ domain binding, as no appreciable binding has been observed to the A-T-N-V C-terminal tail of the human neuropeptide Y receptor type 2 (Table II, B). We are currently evaluating other proteins from Table III for their ability to bind RGS12.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III
Potential RGS12 PDZ domain-binding proteins

Binding of the RGS12 PDZ domain to the RGS12 A-T-F-V tail was somewhat weaker than binding to the CXCR2 tail. However, among those form(s) of RGS12 containing both the N-terminal PDZ domain and the A-T-F-V C terminus, the interaction could be kinetically favored given its intramolecular nature. Such a scenario is reminiscent of the mechanism of reversible autoinhibition of Src family kinases, which adopt a "closed" conformation upon intramolecular association of their N-terminal SH2 and SH3 domains with C-terminal motifs (27). Intramolecular association of the N and C termini within RGS12 isoform(s) may serve as a source of regulation, either of its Gialpha -directed GAP activity or of PDZ-mediated binding to other proteins. The ability of the alternative C terminus to serve as a docking site for PDZ domain-containing proteins also presents the possibility of in vivo concatemerization and/or organization of RGS12 within multi-component signaling complexes. Compartmentalization by virtue of the N- and/or C-terminal domains of RGS12 could thereby associate desensitizing GAP activity within specific receptor complexes, analogous to inclusion of the negative regulatory function of protein kinase C within the Drosophila phototransduction complex by InaD (14).

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank J. Krumm, B. Sutton, and L. Antonio for sterling sequencing support, M. Jarosinski and T. Zamborelli for precise peptide production, L. Harrington and M. Tyers for interaction trap tips, D. Sawutz for suggesting various G-protein-coupled receptor tails for analysis, and J. McGlade and V. Stambolic for critical appraisal.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by Amgen, Inc. (to D. P. S.), National Institutes of Health Grants HL16037 (to R. J. L.) and GM34497 (to A. G. G.), and by the Raymond and Ellen Willie Distinguished Chair in Molecular Neuropharmacology (to A. G. G.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF035151 and AF035152.

parallel To whom correspondence should be addressed: Quantitative Biology Laboratory, Amgen Institute, 620 University Avenue, Suite 706, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C1, Canada. Fax: 416-204-2277; E-mail: dsiderov{at}amgen.com.

1 The abbreviations used are: RGS, regulator of G-protein signaling; AD, activation domain; AR, adrenergic receptor; bp, base pair(s); CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid; DBD, DNA binding domain; DTT, dithiothreitol; GAP, GTPase-activating protein; GPCR, G-protein-coupled receptor; GST, glutathione S-transferase; GTPase, guanosine triphosphatase; h, human; kb, kilobase(s); myr, myristoylated; NHERF, Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PDZ, PSD-95, Disc-large, and ZO-1; r, rat; RU, response unit(s); SPR, surface plasmon resonance; Trx, thioredoxin; UTR, untranslated region.

2 T. Ingi, A. M. Krumins, P. Chidiac, G. M. Brothers, S. Chung, B. E. Snow, C. A. Barnes, A. A. Lanahan, D. P. Siderovski, E. M. Ross, A. G. Gilman, and P. F. Worley, submitted for publication.

3 G. M. Brothers and D. P. Siderovski, unpublished data.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

  1. Siderovski, D. P., Hessel, A., Chung, S., Mak, T. W., and Tyers, M. (1996) Curr. Biol. 6, 211-212[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Koelle, M. R., and Horvitz, H. R. (1996) Cell 84, 115-125[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Druey, K. M., Blumer, K. J., Kang, V. H., and Kerhl, J. H. (1996) Nature 379, 742-746[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Dohlman, H. G., and Thorner, J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 3871-3874[Free Full Text]
  5. Berman, D. M., and Gilman, A. G. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1269-1272[Free Full Text]
  6. Siderovski, D. P., Heximer, S. P., and Forsdyke, D. R. (1994) DNA Cell Biol. 13, 125-147[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Gold, S. J., Ni, Y. G., Dohlman, H. G., and Nestler, E. J. (1997) J. Neurosci. 17, 8024-8037[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. De Vries, L., Elenko, E., Hubler, L., Jones, T. L. Z., and Farquhar, M. G. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 15203-15208[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Snow, B. E., Antonio, L., Suggs, S., Gutstein, H. B., and Siderovski, D. P. (1997) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 233, 770-777[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Ponting, C. P., and Bork, P. (1996) Trends Biochem. Sci. 21, 245-246[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Ponting, C. P., Phillips, C., Davies, K. E., and Blake, D. J. (1997) BioEssays 19, 469-479[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Sheng, M. (1996) Neuron 17, 575-578[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Sato, T., Irie, S., Kitada, S., and Reed, J. C. (1995) Science 268, 411-415[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Tsunoda, S., Sierralta, J., Sun, Y. M., Bodner, R., Suzuki, E., Becker, A., Socolich, M., and Zuker, C. S. (1997) Nature 388, 243-249[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Snow, B. E., Antonio, L., Suggs, S., and Siderovski, D. P. (1998) Gene 206, 247-253[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Lee, E., Linder, M. E., and Gilman, A. G. (1994) Methods Enzymol. 237, 146-164[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Biddlecome, G. H., Berstein, G., and Ross, E. M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 7999-8007[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Berman, D. M., Wilkie, T. M., and Gilman, A. G. (1996) Cell 86, 445-452[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. James, P., Halladay, J., and Craig, E. A. (1996) Genetics 144, 1425-1436[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Durfee, T., Becherer, K., Chen, P.-L., Yeh, S.-H., Yang, Y., Kilburn, A. E., Lee, W.-H., and Elledge, S. J. (1993) Genes Dev. 7, 555-569[Abstract]
  21. Berstein, G., Blank, J. L., Smrcka, A. V., Higashijima, T., Sternweis, P. C., Exton, J. H., and Ross, E. M. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 8081-8088[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Hall, R. A., Premont, R. T., Chow, C.-W., Blitzer, J. T., Pitcher, J. A., Claing, A., Stoffel, R. H., Barak, L. S., Shenolikar, S., Weinman, E. J., Grinstein, S., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1998) Nature 392, 626-630[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Fields, S., and Song, O. (1989) Nature 340, 245-246[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Songyang, Z., Fanning, A. S., Fu, C., Xu, J., Marfatia, S. M., Chishti, A. H., Crompton, A., Chan, A. C., Anderson, J. M., and Cantley, L. C. (1997) Science 275, 73-77[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Brakeman, P. R., Lanahan, A. A., O'Brien, R., Roche, K., Barnes, C. A., Huganir, R. L., and Worley, P. F. (1997) Nature 386, 284-288[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Doyle, D. A., Lee, A., Lewis, J., Kim, E., Sheng, M., and MacKinnon, R. (1996) Cell 85, 1067-1076[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Superti-Furga, G. (1995) FEBS Lett. 369, 62-66[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.