Calmodulin Inhibitor W13 Induces Sustained Activation of ERK2 and Expression of p21cip1*

Marta BoschDagger , Joan Gil§, Oriol BachsDagger , and Neus AgellDagger

From the Dagger  Departament de Biologia Cel.lular i Anatomia Patològica, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Facultat de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain and the § Departament de Ciències Fisiològiques II, Campus de Bellvitge, Universitat de Barcelona, 08907 Barcelona, Spain

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

One of the major signaling pathways by which extracellular signals induce cell proliferation and differentiation involves the activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs). Because calmodulin is essential for quiescent cells to enter cell cycle, the role of calmodulin on ERK2 activation was studied in cultured fibroblasts. Serum, phorbol esters, or active Ras induced ERK2 activation in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts. This activation was not inhibited by calmodulin blockade. Surprisingly, inhibition of calmodulin prior to fetal bovine serum addition prolonged activation of ERK2. Furthermore, inactivation of calmodulin in serum-starved cells induced ERK2 phosphorylation that was dependent on MAP kinase kinase (MEK). Inactivation of calmodulin in serum-starved cells also induced activation of Ras, Raf, and MEK. On the contrary, tyrosine phosphorylation of tyrosine kinase receptors was not observed. These results indicate that calmodulin inhibits ERK2 activation pathway at the level of Ras. Calmodulin inhibition induced overexpression of p21cip1 which was dependent on MEK activity. We propose that inhibition of Ras by calmodulin prevents the activation of ERK2 at low serum concentration. Thus, entering into the cell cycle after serum addition would imply the overcoming of the inhibitory effect of calmodulin and consequently ERK2 activation. Furthermore, down-regulation of Ras by calmodulin may be also important to determine the duration of ERK2 activation and to prevent a high p21cip1 expression that would lead to an inhibition of cell proliferation.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Cells have evolved signal transduction pathways that allow them to respond to extracellular signals. Those signaling pathways will lead to the regulation of effector proteins that will finally cause cell proliferation or differentiation.

One of the major signal transduction pathways results in the activation of a class of intracellular protein serine/threonine kinases termed extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs),1 also known as mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) (1). Two highly related mammalian ERKs, ERK1 (p44MAPK) and ERK2 (p42MAPK) are activated in response to growth factors and hormones (2, 3). Once activated, those kinases are able to phosphorylate and activate numerous cytoplasmic proteins including p90rsk (S6 ribosomal protein kinase) (4), phospholipase A2 (5), and EGF receptor (6). After stimulation, ERKs translocate into the nucleus (7) where they activate a number of transcription factors such as Elk1 (8, 9), c-Ets1, and c-Ets2 (10), thus altering the pattern of gene expression (11).

ERKs are activated by a dual phosphorylation on threonine and tyrosine residues. Their specific activators, called MAP kinase kinases (MAPKK) or MEK, constitute a new family of dual-specific threonine/tyrosine kinases (12). MEK1 and MEK2 are the kinases known to activate ERK1 and ERK2. MEK1 and MEK2 are in turn activated by an upstream MAP kinase kinase kinase, which has been identified as the product of the proto-oncogene raf-1 (13). Raf-1 seems to integrate different signals that will lead to ERK activation. Its activation is complex and not completely well understood, with Ras activation being an essential element in the pathway. Active Ras targets Raf-1 to the cell membrane and becomes attached to it by an unknown mechanism (14). However, recruitment of Raf to the membrane by binding to Ras cannot account for full activation of Raf (15). Ras GTPases exist in two conformations, an inactive GDP-bound form and an active GTP-bound state. The cyclic interconversion of Ras is regulated by the activity of the guanidine exchange factors (GEFs), which allow the replacement of Ras-bound GDP by GTP, and the Ras-GTPase activating proteins (GAPs), which activate the intrinsic GTPase activity of Ras that converts GTP back to GDP (16). Activation of Ras by tyrosine kinase receptors involves recruitment of SOS, a guanidine exchange factor to the membrane (2). Other GEFs non-activated by tyrosine kinase receptors that activate Ras have been identified in mammalian cells such as Ras-GRF/CDC25Mm (17).

Activation of the ERK pathway is transient, and it has been argued that it is the duration of ERKs activation that determines whether a stimulus elicits proliferation or differentiation (18, 19, 20). In cells activated to proliferate, Raf is associated to the membrane only for 5 min, and its activity decreases to basal levels 15 min after growth factor addition in cultured fibroblasts (21). ERKs activity after mitogenic stimuli shows a initial peak at 5-10 min followed by a sustained phase of lower activity of 4 h (22). However, a more prolonged or a high intensity activation of the MAPK pathway induces growth arrest of the cells mediated by the cell cycle inhibitor p21cip1 (20, 23, 24). Whereas much attention has focused on the mechanisms leading to ERK phosphorylation by growth factors and oncoproteins, few studies have turned to the question of how the pathway is down-regulated. Several constitutive and inducible ERK phosphatases responsible for its down-regulation have been described (25), including Pyst1 (26), MKP1, 2 (27, 28), and PAC1 (29). Expression of MKP1 has been shown to be ERK- and Ca2+-dependent (30). Less is known about the down-regulation of the pathway upstream of ERK. In some cells, ERK mediates the phosphorylation of SOS to terminate Ras-dependent activation of ERK (31).

Ca2+ and calmodulin (CaM) are known to act as second messengers in signal transduction pathways and to regulate cell proliferation (32-35). Through the action of CaM-binding-proteins like CaM-dependent kinases II and IV, calcineurin, hnRNP A2, hnRNP C, and others, they regulate a great variety of cellular processes, such as gene expression, protein translation, and protein phosphorylation (36). By using expression vectors capable of inducibly synthesizing CaM sense or antisense mRNAs, it has been shown that progression through G1 and mitosis exit is sensitive to changes in the intracellular concentration of CaM (37). Furthermore, the addition of specific anti-CaM drugs to cell cultures inhibits reentry of growth-arrested cells into the cell cycle (G0/G1 transition), the progression into and through the S phase and the entry and exit from mitosis (35, 38-44). During G1, CaM is essential to activate cdk4 and phosphorylate pRb (44, 45). Moreover CaM participates in the activation of cdc2 during mitosis entry (33) and in its inactivation at the metaphase/anaphase transition (46). Despite the evidence indicating that CaM plays a role in cell cycle entry from quiescence (G0/G1 transition), not much is known about the CaM-dependent steps essential for this transition. CaM has been shown to play a role in the activation of the MAPK signaling pathway (47-51). For example, the Ras-GRF exchange factor of cortical neurons is a CaM-binding-proteins, and a Ca2+ influx in these cells is able to activate Ras and ERKs (47). In other cellular types, CaM-dependent kinases have been involved in the MAPK activation pathway (50-51).

We have analyzed here the involvement of CaM in the ERK signaling pathway in cell-cultured fibroblast. Surprisingly, results show that CaM is not essential for the activation of the ERK pathway but for its inactivation. This down-regulation of the pathway is due at least in part to an inhibitory effect of CaM on Ras activation. Furthermore, activation of ERK2 by CaM inhibition induces an increase in p21cip1 expression together with a cell cycle arrest.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Cell Culture-- NIH 3T3 cells (ATCC) or NIH 3T3 cells constitutively expressing active mutant N-Ras (lys61) under a CMV promoter (NIH 3T3RasLys61) (gift of Dr. T. Thompson, Barcelona) or normal rat kidney cells (NRK) were made quiescent by culturing them in Dulbecco's minimum essential medium with 0.5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) during 2 days. 10% FBS, 100 µM TPA, 25 ng/ml EGF, 15 µg/ml W13, 15 µg/ml W12, 5 µM KN93, or 2 µg/ml cyclosporin A were added directly to the media, and for the time indicated in the results.

Gel Electrophoresis and Immunoblotting-- Cells were lysed in a buffer containing 2% SDS, and 67 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8. The same amount of protein of each extract was electrophoresed in SDS-10% PAGE gels essentially as described by Laemmli (52). After electrophoresis, the proteins were transferred to Immobilon-P strips for 2 h at 60 V. The sheets were preincubated in TBS (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl), 0.05% Tween-20, and 5% BSA for 1 h at room temperature and then incubated for 1 h at room temperature in TBS, 0.05% Tween 20, 1% BSA, and 0.5% defatted milk powder containing antibodies against: ERK1 and ERK2 (03-6600 Zymed Laboratories Inc., 1:500 dilution), phospho-ERK1 and ERK2 (No. 9101S, New England Biolabs, 1:500 dilution), phospho-MEK (No. 9121S, New England Biolabs, 1:500 dilution), c-Raf-1 (R19120 Transduction Lab., 1:500 dilution), phospho-Tyr (PY20, Transduction Lab., 1:750 dilution). After washing in TBS, 0.05% Tween-20 (three times, 10 min each), the sheets were incubated with either a peroxidase-coupled secondary antibody (1:1000 dilution) (Bio-Rad) or an alkaline phosphatase-coupled secondary antibody (1:10000) (Promega) for 1 h at room temperature. After incubation, the sheets were washed twice in TBS, 0.05% Tween 20, and once in TBS. The reaction was visualized by ECL (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) or with BCIP/NBT (Promega). Control of protein loading and transfer was done by stripping the gels and re-blotting them with anti-ERK1 and -ERK2 antibodies.

Raf Immunoprecipitation and Kinase Assay-- Immunoprecipitations were performed as described by Morrison (53). Cells (5-10 × 107) were lysed in 1 ml of radioimmune precipitation buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 137 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.1% SDS, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 2 mM EDTA) containing 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM aprotinin, 20 µM leupeptin, and 5 mM sodium vanadate. To immunoprecipitate Raf-1 from cells lysates, 2.5 µg of anti-Raf-1 (R19120, Transduction Lab) or 2.5 µg of a nonrelated monoclonal antibody were first prebound to 20 µl of protein G-Sepharose beads (Sigma) in 1 ml of radioimmune precipitation buffer for 1 h at room temperature. The anti-Raf-coated beads were washed twice with radioimmune precipitation buffer. Then, 500 µg of protein from the lysates were added and incubated for 2 h at 4 °C. The immunoprecipitated complexes were washed three times with 1 ml of cold Nonidet P-40 lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 137 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1% Nonidet P-40, 2 mM EDTA) containing 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM aprotinin, 20 µM leupeptin, and 5 mM sodium vanadate, resuspended, and incubated for 20 min at 25 °C in 40 µl of kinase buffer (30 mM HEPES-Na, pH 7.4, 7 mM MnCl2, 5 mM MgCl2, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 15 µM ATP) plus 20 µCi of [gamma -32P]ATP(3000 Ci/mmol; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and 40 mg/ml pGST-MEK inactive fusion protein. Then, the samples were electrophoresed on SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and the gels were stained with Coomassie Blue, dried, and exposed to x-ray films at -80 °C.

Immunocytochemistry-- Quiescent cells were grown on glass coverslips. To detect ERK1 and ERK2 cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 10 min at room temperature and permeabilized at -20 °C for 10 min with methanol. After washing three times with PBS, the nonspecific sites were subsequently blocked with sheep serum in PBS (1:5) for 30 min at room temperature. Cells were then incubated 1 h at 37 °C, with the specific polyclonal antibodies anti-ERK1 and ERK2 (No. 06-182; Upstate Biotechnology) in 1% BSA/PBS (1:200). Coverslips were then washed three times (5 min each) in PBS and incubated for 45 min at 37 °C with fluorescein-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody (dilution 1:50, Boehringer) in 1% BSA/PBS. After two washes in PBS, coverslips were mounted on glass slides with Mowiol (Calbiochem).

Measurement of Ras Activation-- The capacity of Ras-GTP to bind to RBD (Ras-binding domain of Raf-1) was used to analyze the amount of active Ras (54, 55). Cells were lysed in the culture dish with 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 5 mM EGTA, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1% Triton X-100, 1% N-octyl glucoside, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM aprotinin, and 20 µM Leupeptin. Cleared (10,000 × g) lysate (1 mg) was incubated with 30 µg of GST-RBD bound to glutathione-Sepharose beads for 2 h at 4 °C. Beads were washed four times with the lysis buffer. Bound proteins were solubilized by the addition of 30 µl of Laemmli loading buffer and run on 12.5% SDS-PAGE gels. Proteins were then transferred and immunoblotted as described above using pan-Ras monoclonal antibody (Oncogene Sciences OP40, 1:100 dilution).

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Effect of CaM Inhibition on ERK2 Activation-- Stimulation of serum-starved NIH 3T3 fibroblast by 10% FBS, or 100 µM TPA for 10 min, resulted in an activation of ERK2, as demonstrated by the increase in ERK2 tyrosine phosphorylation analyzed by Western blotting using antiphosphotyrosine antibodies (Fig. 1A) or phospho-specific anti-ERK1 and -ERK2 antibodies (data not shown). To analyze if CaM was essential for the signaling pathways leading to ERK2 phosphorylation, quiescent cells were pretreated with the anti-CaM drug W13 (15 µg/ml) for 20 min prior to stimulation with FBS or TPA. W13 has been extensively used to inhibit CaM in cell cultures, and it is known to be highly specific at the doses used in this work (40, 42, 56, 57). W12 was used as a control because it is a compound chemically similar to W13 but with a much lower affinity for CaM (40). As shown in Fig. 1A, W13-pretreatment did not have any effect on the level of phosphorylated ERK2, determined by Western blotting using antiphosphotyrosine (PY20) antibody (Fig. 1A). The same results were obtained using the antiphospho-ERK2 specific antibodies (data not shown).


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Effect of W13 addition on ERK2 phosphorylation induced by FBS, TPA, or Ras. A, ERK2 phosphorylation in serum- and TPA-stimulated NIH 3T3 fibroblasts after pretreatment with the anti-CaM drug W13. Quiescent NIH 3T3 cells (Q) were stimulated for 10 min with 10% FBS or 100 µM TPA. In the indicated lanes, W12 or W13 (15 µg/ml) was added to the cultures 20 min prior to FBS or TPA addition. B, quiescent NIH 3T3Nras(lys61) (Q) cells, expressing the constitutively active N-ras (lys61) mutant, were treated for 30 min with W12 or W13 (15 µg/ml). In panels A and B, cells were lysed and ERK2 phosphorylation analyzed by Western blotting using the antiphosphotyrosine (PY20) antibody as indicated under "Experimental Procedures." P-ERK2 corresponds to a band of 42 kDa that comigrates with ERK2 using anti-ERK1 and ERK2 antibodies.

ERK2 phosphorylation was also induced at 0.5% FBS by expression of activated N-Ras. Inhibition of CaM in NIH 3T3NRas(Lys61)-transformed cells by W13 treatment for 30 min did not have any effect on Ras-induced ERK2 phosphorylation (Fig. 1B). Thus, CaM is not essential for any of the studied signaling pathways leading to ERK2 activation in NIH 3T3.

Effect of CaM Inhibition on ERK2 Down-regulation-- Because the duration of ERKs activation is also important for cell response, the effect of CaM inhibition on the timing of ERKs phosphorylation was analyzed. In nontreated cells (data not shown) or in cells preincubated with W12 (for 20 min prior to 10% FBS addition) (Fig. 2), ERK2 phosphorylation was high at 10 min, started to decrease at 30 min, and was slightly higher than in unstimulated cells by 2 h after FBS addition. Surprisingly, when cells where preincubated with W13, ERK2 phosphorylation still remained high 2 h after the stimulation (Fig. 2). Inhibition of CaM later in G1 (between 4 and 10 h after serum addition), when ERK2 phosphorylation was already decreased, did not lead to a second activation of ERK2 (data not shown). Thus, inhibition of CaM prolonged the phosphorylation of ERK2, suggesting that CaM is involved in its down-regulation.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Effect of W13 addition on the duration of ERK2 phosphorylation. Quiescent NIH 3T3 cells were preincubated with either W12 or W13 (15 µg/ml) or without any drug (-) and 20 min later were stimulated with 10% FBS and harvested at the indicated times (t). Cells were lysed and ERK2 phosphorylation was analyzed by Western blot using the antiphospho-ERK1 and ERK2 antibody as indicated under "Experimental Procedures." A representative experiment of three different experiments is shown in the figure.

The effect of W13 on ERK2 phosphorylation in serum-starved cells was also analyzed. When serum-starved cells (0.5% FBS) were incubated with W13 for 30 min, an increase in ERK2 phosphorylation was observed. This increase was similar to that produced by addition of 10% FBS and was not observed with W12 (Fig. 3A). This effect was not mediated by CaM-dependent kinase II or calcineurin because treatment of serum-starved cells with KN93, an inhibitor of CaM-dependent-kinase II, or cyclosporin A, an inhibitor of calcineurin, did not induce ERK2 phosphorylation (Fig. 3A).


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   W13 addition induces ERK2 phosphorylation at low FBS concentration. A, quiescent (Q) NIH 3T3 cells (0.5% FBS) were treated for 10 min with 10% FBS or for 30 min with W12 (15 µg/ml), W13 (15 µg/ml), cyclosporin A (2 µg/ml) (C.A.), or KN93 (5 µM). Then, cells were lysed and ERK2 phosphorylation was analyzed by Western blotting using the antiphosphotyrosine (PY20) antibody as indicated under "Experimental Procedures." P-ERK2 corresponds to a band of 42 kDa that comigrates with ERK2 using anti-ERK1 and ERK2 antibodies. A representative experiment of three different experiments is shown in the figure. B, quiescent NIH 3T3 cells were cultured for 10 h in a media without FBS. Then, W12 (black-square) or W13 (bullet ) (15 µg/ml) were added to the media, and 20 min later, cells were treated for 10 min with increasing concentrations of FBS. Cells were lysed and ERK2 phosphorylation was analyzed by Western blotting using the antiphospho-ERK1 and -ERK2 antibodies as indicated under "Experimental Procedures." Bands were quantified by an image analysis system (Bio-Image, Millipore). Values in the graph are the mean of three different experiments; standard deviations are lower than 10% of the mean.

Cooperation between FBS addition and CaM inhibition to induce ERK2 phosphorylation was analyzed in quiescent cells that had been maintained for the last 10 h in the complete absence of FBS. Cells were pre-treated with W12 or W13 for 20 min, and ERK2 phosphorylation was studied 10 min after addition of increasing amounts of FBS. As shown in Fig. 3B, W13 addition synergized with low concentrations of FBS to induce ERK2 phosphorylation. Maximal increase in ERK2 phosphorylation induced by CaM inhibition was observed at 0.5% FBS. In agreement with the results in Fig. 1A, when the amount of FBS added to the media was higher than 2%, no additional increase in ERK2 phosphorylation was induced by CaM inhibition (Fig. 3B). Similar results were obtained using NRK cells (data not shown). These results suggest that CaM inhibits any of the signaling pathways by which FBS activates ERK2.

We also analyzed whether ERK2 phosphorylation induced by CaM inhibition in serum-starved cells correlated with a nuclear accumulation of ERKs. As shown in Fig. 4, after 2 days of serum starvation, ERK2 was localized in the cytoplasm. Treatment with W13 for 30 min induced a translocation of ERK2 into the nucleus similar to what occurred with 10% FBS incubation. W13 treatment of serum-starved NIH 3T3 cells also induced an increase in fos mRNA levels analyzed by Northern blotting (data not shown).


View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Immunolocalization of ERK2 after W13 addition. Quiescent (Q) NIH 3T3 cells were treated with 10% FBS, W12 (15 µg/ml) or W13 (15 µg/ml) for 30 min. Then cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and subcellular localization of ERK2 was analyzed by immunocytochemistry using anti-ERK1 and ERK2 antibodies as indicated under "Experimental Procedures." FBS and W13 but not W12 induced the translocation of ERK2 from the cytoplasm into the nucleus.

Analysis of the Pathway Leading to ERK2 Activation by CaM Inhibition-- The only kinases known to phosphorylate and activate ERK2 are MEK1 and MEK2. Thus, we analyzed whether these kinases were involved in ERK phosphorylation induced by CaM inhibition. As shown in Fig. 5A, ERK2 phosphorylation induced by W13 addition to serum-starved cells was not observed when cells were previously treated with the specific inhibitor of MEK, PD98059 (Calbiochem). Furthermore, W13 addition to serum-starved cells induced an increase in MEK phosphorylation as determined by Western blotting using phospho-MEK-specific antibodies (Fig. 5B). These results indicate that W13 induces ERK2 phosphorylation by MEK and that CaM inhibits the activation of MEK at low serum concentration.


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   MEK is involved in the phosphorylation of ERK induced by W13 addition in serum-starved cells. A, quiescent NIH 3T3 cells (Q) were treated for 10 min with 10% FBS or for 30 min with W12 or W13 (15 µg/ml). In the indicated lane (W13/PD), cells were incubated with the MEK inhibitor PD98059 (100 µM) for 30 min prior to the addition of W13. ERK1 and ERK2 phosphorylation was determined by Western blotting using antiphospho-ERK1 and -ERK2 antibodies as indicated under "Experimental Procedures." B, quiescent NIH 3T3 cells were activated with 10% FBS for 10 min or treated with W12 or W13 (15 µg/ml) for 30 min. MEK1 and MEK2 phosphorylation was analyzed by Western blotting using antiphospho-MEK1 and MEK2 specific antibodies as indicated under "Experimental Procedures." The same blot was subsequently incubated with antiphospho-ERK1 and ERK2 specific antibody.

Next, the effect of CaM inhibition on Raf-1, the main kinase involved in MEK1 and MEK2 activation, was analyzed. W13 addition to serum-starved cells induced an increase in Raf-1 activity as determined by immunoprecipitation followed by kinase assay using inactive MEK-GST as substrate, compared with W12-treated cells and quiescent cells (Fig. 6A). CaM inhibition induced also a gel-mobility shift of Raf-1, similar to that induced by FBS (Fig. 6B) that has been related with its phosphorylation and activation. Although Raf activation is not very well understood, the increase in Ras-GTP seems to be an essential event for Raf activation. Thus, the levels of Ras-GTP upon W13 treatment of serum-starved cells were analyzed. As shown in Fig. 7A, CaM inhibition induced an increase in the levels of Ras-GTP that was not observed in W12-treated cells. The levels of Ras-GTP after W13 treatment were as high as those reached upon 10% FBS addition. A mechanism for Ras activation is activation of tyrosine kinase receptors involving autophosphorylation of these receptors and the recruitment of SOS to the plasma membrane through the interaction with the adapter protein GRB2. After 10 min of 10% FBS addition to serum-starved cells, tyrosine phosphorylation was increased in the area of the gel where the EGF receptors and PDGF receptors move, 170-190 kDa (Fig. 7B). On the contrary, no increase in tyrosine phosphorylation in the same area of the gel was observed after the addition of W13 or W12 to serum-starved cells (Fig. 7B). Thus, CaM inhibition induced activation of Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK without any detectable activation of tyrosine kinase receptors.


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Effect of W13 addition on Raf activation. A, quiescent NIH 3T3 cells (Q) were treated for 10 min with 10% FBS or for 30 min with W12 or W13 (15 µg/ml). Cells were lysed and immunoprecipitated with anti-Raf antibody (anti-Raf-1) or with a control nonrelated monoclonal antibody (mAb) and assayed for kinase activity using MEK-GST as substrate as indicated under "Experimental Procedures." A representative experiment of a total of three is shown in the figure. B, Raf-1 phosphorylation after CaM inhibition in serum-starved NIH 3T3 cells. Quiescent NIH 3T3 cells (Q) were treated for 10 min with 10% FBS or for 30 min with W12 or W13 (15 µg/ml). Cells lysates and Western blot analysis using anti-raf-1 antibody were done as indicated under "Experimental Procedures." The decrease in the electrophoretical mobility of Raf-1 corresponds to its phosphorylation. The change in electrophoretical mobility in FBS-stimulated and W13-treated cells was reproducible in a total of three experiments.


View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Effect of W13 addition on Ras activation and growth factor receptor tyrosine phosphorylation. A, quiescent NIH 3T3 cells (Q) were treated for 10 min with 10% FBS or for 30 min with W12 or W13 (15 µg/ml). Cells were lysated and Ras-GTP was determined by precipitating with RBD-Sepharose followed by Western blotting with anti-Ras antibody as indicated under "Experimental Procedures." B, quiescent NIH 3T3 cells (Q) were treated for 10 min with 10% FCS (FCS), 25 ng/ml EGF, or for 30 min with W12 or W13 (15 µg/ml). Cells were lysated and Western blots were performed as indicated under "Experimental Procedures" using antiphosphotyrosine antibodies (PY20).

CaM Inhibition Increased the Levels of the Cell Cycle Inhibitor p21cip1 and Inhibited Cell Proliferation-- In agreement with previous reports (38) when W13 was added to quiescent serum-starved NIH 3T3 cells 20 min prior to 10% FBS addition, DNA synthesis at 20 h was inhibited by 80%. As inhibition of CaM prevents entry in S phase and prolongs ERK activation, we looked for a relationship between these two effects. The expression of p21cip1 has been shown to be dependent on ERK1 and ERK2 activity (20). Thus, the levels of this cell cycle inhibitor were analyzed upon CaM inhibition. In W13-pretreated cells, a prolonged expression of p21cip1 was observed upon FBS addition (Fig. 8A), being the p21cip1 protein still present 9 h after serum addition. On the contrary, in control cells (W12-pretreated cells), 10% FBS addition induced a transient increase in p21cip1 that showed a maximum at 2 h (Fig. 8A). Thus, inhibition of CaM induced sustained ERK2 activation and increased p21 expression, in parallel with an inhibition of cell cycle progression.


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Effect of W13 addition on p21cip1 expression. A, quiescent NIH 3T3 cells (Q) were treated with either W12 or W13 (15 µg/ml) and 20 min later were stimulated with 10% FBS. Cells were harvested at the indicated times after FBS addition. B, quiescent NIH 3T3 cells (Q) were treated with 10% FBS, W12, or W13 (15 µg/ml) for 2 h. In the indicated lane (W13/PD), cells were incubated with the MEK inhibitor PD98059 (100 µM) for 30 min prior to the addition of W13. In both panels A and B, cells were lysed and p21cip1 levels were analyzed by Western blotting as indicated under "Experimental Procedures." Both panels A and B are representative results of three different experiments.

CaM inhibition in serum-starved cells (0.5% FBS) also induced the expression of p21cip1 (Fig. 8B). This p21cip1 expression is MEK-dependent because it was not observed when the cells were preincubated with the MEK inhibitor PD98059 (100 µM) prior to W13 addition (Fig. 8B).

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

ERK signaling pathway is very important for the cellular response to extracellular signals. Signaling through this pathway has been shown to mediate differentiation, proliferation, or oncogenic transformation depending on the cellular context and the duration of the activation (19, 58) Thus, in addition to activation of ERK, its down-regulation is also decisive for cell response. Inactivation of the pathway is important to prevent ERK phosphorylation at low serum concentration and to prevent an excessively prolonged peak of ERK activity when cells are stimulated by growth factors. In this sense, constitutive and serum-inducible ERK phosphatases have been described, but inactivation of the pathway upstream of ERK is not well understood. We have analyzed the involvement of CaM in ERK activation and inactivation pathways in cell-cultured fibroblasts.

Ca2+ and CaM are essential for the activation of ERK in response to various stimuli in cortical neurons and lymphocytes; however, we have shown here that CaM is not essential to activate ERK2 by serum, TPA or constitutive activation of Ras in cultured fibroblasts (NIH 3T3 or NRK cells).These results agree with the fact that in Rat-1 cells, buffering of Ca2+ does not prevent ERK activation induced by LPA or EGF (31). Thus, although CaM is necessary for NIH 3T3 fibroblast to reenter cell cycle from quiescence, it is not essential for ERK2 activation.

We have shown that CaM is involved in the down-regulation of the ERK2 activation pathway. CaM inhibition increases the duration of ERK2 phosphorylation when cells are stimulated with 10% FBS. ERK2 activation has a dual effect on cell proliferation. On one hand it induces the expression of cyclin D1 which is essential for G1 progression (59, 60), and on the other hand it induces p21cip1 expression (20). p21cip1 seems to be necessary at low levels for cdk4/cyclin D1 activation, but at high levels acts as an inhibitor of cdk4/cyclin D1 and cdk2/cyclin E (61, 62). Thus, an intense or highly sustained activation of ERK2 could induce an excessive increase of p21cip1 expression and, as a consequence, cell cycle inhibition. In fact, a high intensity Raf signal has recently been shown to cause a cell cycle arrest mediated by p21cip1 (23, 24). In agreement with that, the sustained activation of ERK2 induced by CaM inhibition in serum-stimulated cells correlates with a lengthened expression of p21cip1 and an inhibition of cell proliferation. At least two reports indicate an inhibitory role of Ca2+ on ERK activity. First, expression of the ERK phosphatase, MKP1, is Ca2+-dependent in Rat-1 cells; consequently, a depletion of the intracellular Ca2+ in these cells induces a more sustained increase in ERK1 activity (31). Second, Ca2+ addition to cultures inhibits EGF-induced stimulation of ERK2 activity in human primary keratinocytes (63). We have also shown that CaM inhibition not only leads to a prolonged activation of ERK2 upon FBS addition but also to an activation of ERK2 at low serum concentration. The fact that, in total absence of FBS, CaM inhibition has almost no effect on ERK phosphorylation, but that a cooperation exists between CaM inhibition and FBS addition for the activation of ERK2, suggests that CaM inhibits any of the signal transduction pathways leading to ERK2 phosphorylation that are activated by FBS. We have analyzed the activation of different elements of the ERK signaling pathway and shown that CaM inhibition leads also to Ras, Raf, and MEK activation. Thus, we conclude that CaM is down-regulating the Ras activation pathway, although a multiple effect of CaM at several levels in the ERK signaling pathway cannot be excluded. We have also proved that CaM-dependent kinase II or the CaM-dependent phosphatase calcineurin are not involved in the inhibitory effect of CaM on the ERK activation pathway.

The rate-limiting step in Ras activation is the exchange of bound GDP for GTP, which is catalyzed by GEFs (16). Several guanidine exchange factors are involved in Ras activation in response to different stimuli. In response to tyrosine kinase receptors activation, Ras is activated by the SOS nucleotide-exchange factor. Access of SOS to the membrane where Ras is located is because of the binding of SOS to the receptor through SH2 domain- and SH3 domain-mediated interactions involving the adapter proteins GRB2 and SHC. Although it has been shown that some tyrosine kinase receptors such as EGF receptor are able to bind CaM (64, 65) we have not observed any increase in tyrosine phosphorylation levels of the EGF receptor or any other protein of 170-190 kDa after CaM inhibition. Other Ras guanidine exchange factor have been identified as Ras-GRF/Cdc25Mm (66) and Ras-GRF2 (67). Both factors are most abundant in brain but are also expressed in other tissues and a variety of cell lines (66, 68). Activation of these factors is not very well understood, and they have been suggested to respond to G protein-coupled receptors (69). Both factors contain IQ motifs that allow their binding to CaM, and in both neurons and epithelial cells, its activity seems to be stimulated by Ca2+ (47, 67). Those results are controversial because in vitro studies show that full-length Ras-GRF activity is inhibited by CaM (70). Our results agree with the presence of Ras-GRF or a homologous protein in NIH 3T3 cells whose activity is inhibited by CaM. Studies to determine this are underway in our laboratory. Alternatively CaM could activate a GAP protein acting on Ras. In this sense, it has been shown that IQGAP1 binds CaM and that its interaction with cdc42 is inhibited by CaM (71).

We propose two possible physiological roles, which are not exclusive, for the negative regulation of the ERK signaling pathway by CaM. First, CaM is defining a threshold in the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling pathway to prevent activation of the pathway at low serum concentration because of the basal activity of some components of the pathway upstream of Ras. When growth factor receptors are activated by serum addition, this threshold is overpassed and ERK is activated even in the presence of Ca2+ and CaM. Second, CaM down-regulation of Ras is essential to regulate the duration and the intensity of ERK activation. In consequence, CaM inhibition prolongs Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK activation and p21cip1 expression, and thus induces inhibition of cell cycle progression.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. F. R. McKenzie (Nice, France), for the gift of GST-RBD plasmid and the advice in the Ras activity analysis, and Dr. Timothy Thompson (Barcelona, Spain), for the gift of the NIH 3T3RasLys61 cell line. We also thank Esther Castaño for the help in the analysis of c-fos expression and Anna Bosch for the technical assistance in confocal microscopy. We are also grateful to Dr. N. Rocamora and Dr. J. Comella for fruitful discussions.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by a Fondo de Investigaceones Sanitarias de la Seguridad Social Grant 94/1017 and a Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología Grant SAF95-0041-C02-02.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. Biologia Cellular, Fac. Medicina, U. Barcelona, C/Casanova 143, 08036 Barcelona, Spain. Tel. and Fax: 34-3-4021907; E-mail: agell{at}medicina.ub.es.

The abbreviations used are: ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; EGF, epidermal growth factor; GEF, guanidine exchange factor; GAP, GTPase activating protein; CaM, calmodulin; FBS, fetal bovine serum; TPA, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetateW12, N-(4-aminobutyl)-2-naphthalenesulfonamideW13, N-(4-aminobutyl)-5-chloro-2-naphthalenesulfonamidePAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresisBSA, bovine serum albuminPBS, phosphate-buffered salinePMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluorideRBD, Ras-binding domain of Raf-1NRK, normal rat kidney cellsGST, glutathione S-transferaseMEK, MAP kinase kinaseSOS, son of sevenlessLPA, lysophosphatidic acid.
    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Robinson, M. J., and Cobb, M. H. (1997) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 180-186[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Buday, L., and Downward, J. (1993) Cell 73, 611-620[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Gutkind, J. S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1839-1842[Free Full Text]
  4. Sturgill, T. W., Ray, L. B., Erikson, E., and Maller, J. L. (1988) Nature 334, 715-718[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Lin, L. L., Wartmann, M., Lin, A. Y., Knopf, J. L., Seth, A., and Davis, R. J. (1993) Cell 72, 269-278[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Takishima, K., Griswold-Prenner, I., Ingebritsen, T., and Rosner, M. R. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 2520-2524[Abstract]
  7. Lenormand, P., Sardet, C., Pages, G., L'Allemain, G., Brunet, A., and Pouyssegur, J. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 122, 1079-1088[Abstract]
  8. Marais, R., Wynne, J., and Treisman, R. (1993) Cell 73, 381-393[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Gille, H., Sharrocks, A. D., and Shaw, P. E. (1992) Nature 358, 414-417[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Coffer, P., De-Jonge, M., Mettouchi, A., Binetruy, B., Ghysdael, J., and Kruijer, W. (1994) Oncogene 9, 911-921[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Hill, C. S, and Treisman, R. (1995) Cell 80, 199-211[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Crews, C. M., Alessandrini, A., and Erikson, R. L. (1992) Science 258, 478-480[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Howe, L. R., Leevers, S. J., Gomez, N., Nakielny, S., Cohen, P., and Marshall, C. J. (1992) Cell 71, 335-342[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Stokoe, D., MacDonald, S. G., Cadwallader, K., Symons, M., and Hancock, J. F. (1994) Science 264, 1463-1467[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Mineo, C., Anderson, R. G., and White, M. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 10345-10348[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Downward, J. (1992) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2, 13-18[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Shou, C., Farnsworth, C. L., Neel, B. G, and Feig, L. A. (1992) Nature 358, 351-354[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Kahan, C., Seuwen, K., Meloche, S., and Pouyssegur, J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 13369-13375[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Marshall, C. J. (1995) Cell 80, 179-185[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Pumiglia, K. M., and Decker, S. J. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 448-452[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Watmann, M., and Davis, R. J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 6695-6701[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Meloche, S., Seuwen, K., Pages, G., and Pouyssegur, J. (1992) Mol. Endocrinol. 6, 845-854[Abstract]
  23. Sewing, A., Wiseman, B., Lloyd, A. C., and Land, H. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 5588-5597[Abstract]
  24. Woods, D., Parry, D., Cherwinski, E. B., Lees, E., and McMahon, M. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 5598-5611[Abstract]
  25. Hunter, T. (1995) Cell 80, 225-236[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Groom, L. A., Sneddon, A. A., Alessi, D. R., Dowd, S., and Keyse, S. M. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 3621-3632[Abstract]
  27. Sun, H., Charles, C. H., Lau, L. F., and Tonks, N. K. (1993) Cell 75, 487-493[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Guan, K. L., and Butch, E. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 7197-7203[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Ward, Y., Gupta, S., Jensen, P., Wartmann, M., Davis, R. J., and Kelly, K. (1994) Nature 367, 651-654[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Cook, S. J., Beltman, J., Cadwallader, K. A., McMahon, M., and McCormick, F. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 13309-13319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Porfiri, E., and McCormick, F. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5871-5877[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Schulman, H. (1993) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 5, 247-253[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Lu, K. P., and Means, A. R. (1993) Endocr. Rev. 14, 40-57[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Lev, S., Moreno, H., Martinez, R., Canoll, P., Peles, E., Musacchio, J. M., Plowman, G. D., Rudy, B., and Schlessinger, J. (1995) Nature 376, 737-745[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Herget, T., Broad, S., and Rozengurt, E. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 225, 549-556[Abstract]
  36. Agell, N., and Bachs, O. (1995) Calcium and Calmodulin Function in the Cell Nucleus, Molecular Biology Inteligence Unit. R. G. Landes Company, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg
  37. Rasmussen, C. D., and Means, A. R. (1989) EMBO J. 8, 73-82[Abstract]
  38. Chafouleas, J. G., Lagace, L., Bolton, W. E., Boyd, A. E., and Means, A. R. (1984) Cell 36, 73-81[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Boynton, A. L., Whitfield, J. F., and MacManus, J. P. (1980) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 95, 745-749[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Chafouleas, J. G., Bolton, W. E., Hidaka, H., Boyd, A. E., and Means, A. R. (1982) Cell 28, 41-50[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Eilam, Y., and Chernichovsky, Y. J. (1988) Gen. Microbiol. 143, 1063-1069
  42. Hidaka, H., Sasaki, Y., and Tanaka, T. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 78, 4354-4357[Abstract]
  43. Lopez-Girona, A., Colomer, J., Pujol, M. J., Bachs, O., and Agell, N. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 184, 1517-1523[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Takuwa, N., Zhou, W., Kumada, M., and Takuwa, T. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 138-145[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Agell, A., Aligué, R., Alemany, A., Castro, A., Jaime, M., Pujol, M. J., Rius, E., Serratosa, J., Taulés, M., and Bachs, O. Cell Calcium 23, 115-121
  46. Lorca, T., Cruzalegui, F. H., Fesquet, D., Cavadore, J. C., Méry, J., Means, A., and Dorée, M. (1993) Nature 366, 270-273[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Farnsworth, C. L., Freshney, N. W., Rosen, L. B., Ghosh, A., Greenberg, M. E., and Feig, L. A. (1995) Nature 376, 524-527[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Della Rocca, G. J., Van Biesen, T., Daaka, Y., Luttrell, D. K., Luttrell, L. M., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 19125-19132[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Eguchi, S., Matsumoto, T., Motley, E. D., Utsunomiya, H., and Inagami, T. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 14169-14175[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Enslen, H., Tokumitsu, H., Stork, P. J., Davis, R. J., and Soderling, T. R. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 10803-10808[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Muthalif, M. M., Benter, I. F., Uddin, M. R., and Malik, K. U. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 30149-30157[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  53. Morrison, D. K. (1995) Methods Enzymol. 255, 301-310[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  54. McKenzie, F. R., and Pouysségur, J. (1998) Anal. Biochem., in press
  55. De Rooij, J., and Bos, J. L. (1997) Oncogene 14, 623-625[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. López-Girona, A., Bosch, M., Bachs, O., and Agell, N. (1995) Cell Calcium 18, 30-40[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  57. López-Girona, A., Bachs, O., and Agell, N. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 217, 566-574[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  58. Traverse, S., Gómez, N., Paterson, H., Marshall, C., and Cohen, P. (1992) Biochem. J. 288, 351-355[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  59. Lavoie, J. N., L'Allemain, G., Brunet, A., Muller, R., and Pouyssegur, J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 20608-20616[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Weber, J. D., Raben, D. M., Phillips, P. J., and Baldassare, J. J. (1997) Biochem. J. 326, 61-68[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  61. LaBaer, J., Garrett, M. D., Stevenson, L. F., Slingerland, J. M., Sandhu, C., Chou, H. S., Fattaey, A., and Harlow, E. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 847-862[Abstract]
  62. Harper, J. W., Adami, G. R., Wei, N., Keyomarsi, K., and Elledge, S. J. (1993) Cell 75, 805-816[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  63. Medema, J. P., Sark, M. W., Backendorf, C., and Bos, J. L. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 7078-7085[Abstract]
  64. San Jose, E., Benguria, A., Geller, P., and Villalobo, A. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 15237-15245[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Martín-Nieto, J., and Villalobo, A. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 227-236[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  66. Cen, H., Papageorge, A. G., Zippel, R., Lowy, D. R., and Zhang, K. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 4007-4015[Abstract]
  67. Fam, N. P., Fan, W. T., Wang, Z., Zhang, L. J., Chen, H., and Moran, M. F. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 1396-1406[Abstract]
  68. Guerrero, C., Rojas, J. M., Chedid, M., Esteban, L. M., Zimonjic, D. B., Popescu, N. C., Font-de-Mora, J., and Santos, E. (1996) Oncogene 12, 1097-1107[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  69. Mattingly, R. R., and Macara, I. G. (1996) Nature 382, 268-672[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  70. Baouz, S., Jacquet, E., Bernardi, A., and Parmeggiani, A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 6671-6676[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  71. Joyal, J. L., Annan, R. S., Ho, Y. D., Huddleston, M. E., Carr, S. A., Hart, M. J., and Sacks, D. B. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 15419-15425[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.