Direct Real Time Observation of Base Flipping by the EcoRI DNA Methyltransferase*

Barrett W. Allan, Joseph M. BeechemDagger , William M. Lindstrom, and Norbert O. Reich§

From the Department of Chemistry and Program in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106-6081 and the Dagger  Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-0615

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

DNA methyltransferases are excellent prototypes for investigating DNA distortion and enzyme specificity because catalysis requires the extrahelical stabilization of the target base within the enzyme active site. The energetics and kinetics of base flipping by the EcoRI DNA methyltransferase were investigated by two methods. First, equilibrium dissociation constants (KDDNA) were determined for the binding of the methyltransferase to DNA containing abasic sites or base analogs incorporated at the target base. Consistent with a base flipping mechanism, tighter binding to oligonucleotides containing destabilized target base pairs was observed. Second, total intensity stopped flow fluorescence measurements of DNA containing 2-aminopurine allowed presteady-state real time observation of the base flipping transition. Following the rapid formation of an enzyme-DNA collision complex, a biphasic increase in total intensity was observed. The fast phase dominated the total intensity increase with a rate nearly identical to kmethylation determined by rapid chemical quench-flow techniques (Reich, N. O., and Mashoon, N. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 9191-9193). The restacking of the extrahelical base also revealed biphasic kinetics with the recovered amplitudes from these off-rate experiments matching very closely to those observed during the base unstacking process. These results provide the first direct and continuous observation of base flipping and show that at least two distinct conformational transitions occurred at the flipped base subsequent to complex formation. Furthermore, our results suggest that the commitment to catalysis during the methylation of the target site is not determined at the level of the chemistry step but rather is mediated by prior intramolecular isomerization within the enzyme-DNA complex.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

Protein-DNA complexes reveal diverse mechanisms leading to sequence-specific interaction. Direct readout of DNA base functionalities within the major groove and the indirect readout of sequence-dependent phosphate backbone geometry are thought to contribute binding discrimination (1, 2). For DNA modification and repair enzymes the correct assembly of active site residues frequently demands the insertion of protein side chains into and rotating of a base completely out of the DNA helix (3, 4). The stabilization of an extrahelical base is often coupled to sequence-dependent DNA base pair rearrangement (5) and DNA bending (6). However, the energetic cost of the enzyme-mediated DNA deformations integrating site-specific recognition and catalysis are only now being elucidated.

The mechanism leading to the stabilization of an extrahelical base is thought to involve a multi-step binding process with discrete conformational intermediates (4, 7). Enzyme-mediated weakening or breakage of Watson-Crick hydrogen bonds at the target base pair and intercalation of amino acid side chains into the DNA helix are likely to be critical to the initiation of the base flipping process (8). The enhanced discrimination provided by the major groove readout of DNA base functional groups (9) appears for DNA-modifying enzymes to require the sterically encumbered process of extruding a base via the DNA minor groove (3, 5). In contrast, DNA repair enzymes use minor groove readout and extrude the base via the DNA major groove (4, 6). Tighter binding to DNA containing mismatches or otherwise modified target base pairs is observed for DNA-modifying enzymes (10-12). Similarly, enhanced specificity (kcat/Km) with substrates that reduce the investment of binding energy required to "flip out" a base has been detected for DNA repair enzymes (13, 14). These studies suggest that the energetic cost of base flipping substantially affects the equilibrium for enzyme-DNA complex formation. However, the elusive nature of structural transitions such as nucleotide flipping, base pair rearrangement, and DNA bending combined with the lack of suitable detection methodologies leaves obscure the underlying kinetics and catalytic consequences.

EcoRI DNA methyltransferase (M.EcoRI)1 catalyzes methyl-transfer from S-adenosyl-L-methionine (AdoMet) to adenine N6 within double-stranded DNA (15). The methyl-transfer step (kmethylation) of this essentially irreversible reaction is significantly faster than kcat, showing that product release or prior conformational change limits turnover (16). The chemical mechanism proceeds by direct attack of adenine N6 upon the methylsulfonium moiety of AdoMet (17), inducing an inversion in configuration of a chirally labeled methyl group (18). The conserved active site residues between the N6 adenine and N4 cytosine DNA methyltransferases indicates that these enzymes are likely to share a common mechanism of exocyclic amino modification (19).

2-Aminopurine (2AP) is a strongly fluorescent adenine isomer that is highly quenched within duplex DNA due largely to intrastrand base stacking interactions (20). The sensitivity of the 2AP probe to localized DNA conformation and dynamics has been exploited to monitor insertion and excision kinetics by DNA polymerases (21, 22), RNA polymerases (23, 24), helicase activity (25, 26), and conformational changes within the hammerhead ribozyme (27). 2AP-substituted oligonucleotides retain B-form helical parameters and are cleaved by the EcoRI endonuclease (28-30). Using a steady-state 2AP-based base flipping assay, we recently demonstrated that M.EcoRI stabilizes the targeted base extrahelically in a low dielectric environment (7). Herein we extend this assay to the presteady-state, providing assessment of enzyme-assisted base-flipping dynamics continuously in real time. Our data suggest that the rate determining step for methyl-transfer is a first-order isomerization within the enzyme-DNA complex.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

Enzyme Expression and Purification-- M.EcoRI was overexpressed from pXRI (7) and purified essentially as described (31) with the addition of another anion exchange column (Bio-Rex), yielding an enzyme of >99% homogeneity. The purified enzyme was dialyzed extensively in a buffer containing 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.0, 1 mM EDTA, 7 mM beta -mercaptoethanol, 1 mM sodium azide at 4 °C. The enzyme preparation was confirmed to be free of detectable contaminating AdoMet by restriction analysis of pBR322 DNA (contains an EcoRI site) following incubation of the DNA and the enzyme with and without added AdoMet. In the absence of added AdoMet, the plasmid DNA was linearized following challenge with the EcoRI endonuclease (data not shown). M.EcoRI concentration (108 µM) was determined spectrophotometrically at 280 nm utilizing the published extinction coefficient (15).

Oligonucleotide Synthesis and Purification-- Oligonucleotides (14-mers) were synthesized on an Biosearch 3810 DNA synthesizer using beta -cyanoethyl phosphoramidites. Modified base analogs (N6-methyladenosine-1-beta -D-2'-deoxyriboside, 2-aminopurine-1-beta -D-2'-deoxyriboside, nebularine(purine-1-beta -D-2'-deoxyriboside), 2,6-diaminopurine-1-beta -D-2'-deoxyriboside, and abasic) were purchased from Glenn Research (Sterling, VA), and standard phosphoramidites were from Pharmacia Biotech Inc. Oligonucleotides were purified on a Dynamax C18 reversed-phase PureDNA column (Rainin Instrument Co.). DNA purity was assessed by 32P radiolabeling and visualization by overexposure of 20% denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and confirmed to be >99% pure by densitometric analysis utilizing a UVP (San Gabriel, CA) imaging system. Concentrations were determined spectrophotometrically (32). Complementary strands were annealed in 10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl utilizing an MJ Research (Watertown, MA) programmable thermocycler with a slight excess of the unmodified DNA strand. M.EcoRI does not bind single-stranded DNA with detectable affinity (33). The following 14-mers were used: top strands, d(GGCGGAXTTCGCGG) (X = 6-aminopurine(adenine), 2-aminopurine, 2,6-diaminopurine, nebularine (purine), or a stable abasic site (spacer)); bottom strands, d(CCGCGAATTCCGCC), d(CCGCGAATTCCGCC), and d(CCGCGZATTCCGCC) (A = N6-methyladenosine, Z = 2-aminopurine). Hemi-methylated substrates were used to facilitate the formation of unique binding orientations.

Equilibrium Dissociation Constants-- KDDNA values were determined in the presence of the cofactor analog sinefungin essentially as described (34) with minor variations; 100 mM NaCl was used in binding mixtures, all preincubations were done at 20 ± 2 °C for 30 min prior to sample loading onto a prerunning 12% polyacrylamide gel, and electrophoresis was at 4 °C for 1 h at 200 V. These variations minimize dissociation during electrophoresis (data not shown). Following electrophoresis, the relative amounts of free and bound DNA were determined by densitometric analysis of autoradiogram band intensities using a UVP (San Gabriel, CA) imaging system. The percentage of complex was plotted versus enzyme concentration, and the KDDNA was determined by fitting the data to a standard hyperbolic binding expression using KaleidaGraph 2.1.2 (Adelbeck Software).

Stopped Flow System and Fluorescence Detection-- An SFM-3 stopped flow unit containing three stepper-motor driven syringes (Molecular Kinetics, Pullman, WA) with an FC.15 cuvette (50-µl volume) and a hard stop shutter was used for stopped flow reactions. Fluorescence detection for the stopped flow studies utilized a home-built single photon detector consisting of the following: a Hamamatsu R928 photomultiplier, a 5 × 300-MHz amplifier (Stanford Research SR445, Sunnyvale, CA), a discriminator (Stanford Research SR400) and a multichannel scaler (Tennelec Model MCS-II, Oak Ridge, TN), interfaced to an 80486 microcomputer. The detection system was activated by an external synch-out pulse from a Molecular Kinetics stepper motor controlling unit. Data acquisition began at least 100 ms before sample mixing. Data were collected using 1-15-ms dwell times in 8000 total channels. A 250-W xenon arc lamp (SPEX Fluorolog model 1681) with fiber optic output directed into the 50-µl cell was used for excitation at 310 nm. Fluorescence emission was collected through a 360-nm cut-on filter (Hoya Optics type L36). Dead time values were calibrated as described (21). Solutions of enzyme (diluted to 2.4 µM in a degassed buffer containing 100 mM Tris, 10 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT at pH 7.5), double-stranded 2AP-containing duplex DNA (diluted to 0.8 µM), and buffer alone were loaded into three separate syringes. Reactions were initiated by mixing equal volumes (100 µl) of enzyme and DNA solutions at flow rates between 4-10 ml s-1. Multiple runs (typically 15) were summed to increase the signal to noise ratio. Background measurements were made by measuring the fluorescence emission of "pre-shots" of buffer and 2AP-containing duplex DNA alone prior to mixing reactants.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

M.EcoRI DNA Binding Affinity Is Strongly Influenced by the Stability of the Target Base Pair-- DNA containing destabilized base pairs (abasic, mismatched, or modified bases) are bound tightly by DNA methyltransferases (10-12). This was first observed for the C5 cytosine-specific M.HhaI (10) following the determination of the enzyme-DNA cocrystal structure, which clearly shows that the cytosine to be methylated is stabilized in an extrahelical conformation (3). To further test the hypothesis that the N6 adenine-specific M.EcoRI utilizes a similar base flipping mechanism and confirm our previous conclusions (7), equilibrium dissociation constants (KDDNA) were determined for M.EcoRI binding to a series of oligonucleotides that are modified at the target base pair. A binding isotherm derived from the gel mobility shift data for the 2AP-substituted DNA (inset) is shown in Fig. 1. The dissociation constants (KDDNA), free energy differences relative to the unmodified site (Delta Delta ), and structures of the modified base pairs are summarized in Fig. 2.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Equilibrium binding of M.EcoRI to oligonucleotides modified at the target base. Binding mixtures containing 50 pM 32P-labeled DNA, 100 mM NaCl, 100 mM Tris, 10 µM sinefungin, 10 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, pH 7.5, and 0-10 nM enzyme were preincubated at 20 ± 2 °C prior to electrophoresis at 4 °C for 1 h at 200 V. The figure shows the binding isotherm derived from gel shift data for the 2AP-substituted DNA duplex (inset). The other sequences were analyzed similarly with the results summarized in Fig. 2.


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   KDDNA and Delta Delta G° determinations for enzyme-DNA interactions and structures of the modified target base pairs. KDDNA and standard error (shown in parentheses) were determined as described under "Experimental Procedures." The binding free energy differences, relative to the unmodified DNA duplex, for the ternary (enzyme-DNA-sinefungin) complexes were calculated from Delta Delta G° = -RT ln(KDmodified)/(KDunmodified), where R is the universal gas constant. a, hemimethylated abasic duplex; b, unmethylated abasic duplex.

As shown in Fig. 2, substitution of the target base with 2AP or nebularine (purine) resulted in approximately 2-fold tighter binding relative to the unmodified 6-aminopurine (adenine) base. The purine substitution decreases the number of Watson-Crick hydrogen bonds, thereby reducing the energetic cost of base pair disruption. The 2AP:thymidine base pair maintains two hydrogen-bonds (28), but undergoes spontaneous base pair opening 6-fold more rapidly than an adenine:thymidine base pair (35). In contrast, replacement of the target adenine with 2,6-diaminopurine (2,6-DAP) decreased complex stability approximately 12-fold (Fig. 2). The 2,6-DAP:thymidine base pair (36, 37), increases to three the number of hydrogen bonds to be broken during base pair disruption. These analogs (purine derivatives) form stable base pairs with the partner thymidine; therefore, the nearest neighbor stacking interactions are expected to remain relatively unperturbed (38). However, the complete removal of base stacking interactions and hydrogen bonds at the target base leads to the most stable enzyme-DNA interaction; DNA containing abasic target base substitutions are bound approximately 4-fold more tightly by M.EcoRI (Fig. 2) with free energy changes (Delta Delta G°) of -0.78 and -0.82 kcal mol-1 for unmethylated and hemimethylated abasic duplexes, respectively. Although the free energy differences in the ternary (enzyme-DNA-sinefungin) complexes are not extensive, these results are consistent with those reported for other DNA methyltransferases (10-12) and correlate well with the thermal stabilities determined when some of these single-analog substitutions were incorporated into an octamer with an EcoRI site (38).

The gain in binding energy observed upon removal of the exocyclic amino moiety implies that unfavorable interactions are made at this position within the ternary (enzyme-DNA-sinefungin) complex (Fig. 2). Furthermore, replacing a hydrogen with an amino group at the adenine C2 position did not lead to steric exclusion from the enzyme active site.2 These observations suggest that the stabilization of the extrahelical purine is mediated by forces other than direct enzyme interaction with the DNA base functional groups. Structural data and sequence comparisons for the amino-specific DNA methyltransferases show that these enzymes contain active sites rich in aromatic and hydrophobic amino acid residues (19, 40-42). In addition, the large (~10 nm) blue shift in the 2AP emission lambda max following complex formation with M.EcoRI (7) indicates placement of the target base in an environment of significantly lower dielectric constant than the interior of the DNA double helix (20). These observations suggest that the extrahelical purine is likely to be stabilized largely by hydrophobic interactions.

The overall inverse correlation between KDDNA and the strength of the base pair (Fig. 2) supports a base flipping mechanism for M.EcoRI (10-12), allowing limits to be set regarding the energetic cost of DNA distortion. Moreover, these results show that the disruption of the target base pair is a dominant energetic barrier to the tightly bound complex. The lack of steric exclusion of the modified target bases from the enzyme active site suggests that once the base is positioned extrahelically, the primary determinant for methyl-transfer is the presence of the N6 amino nucleophilic center. The minimal substrate thus appears to be a flippable purine base with an amino group at the N6 position. However, equilibrium binding determinations reveal only the sum of numerous thermodynamic effects and leave unresolved the rate of the base flipping step and the relevance of extrahelical base stabilization to sequence specificity and the catalytic cycle.

Real Time Analysis of Base Flipping by Stopped Flow Fluorescence of 2AP-- Steady-state fluorescence of 2AP-substituted DNA showed a 14-fold increase in fluorescence emission intensity following titration of double-stranded DNA containing 2AP at the target base with saturating M.EcoRI (7). Although enzyme-assisted stabilization of an extrahelical base can only be confirmed by an x-ray diffraction structure of an enzyme complexed with double-stranded DNA, the large increase in 2AP fluorescence intensity clearly indicates an unstacking of the probe within the complex. Total intensity stopped flow fluorescence time courses of M.EcoRI interaction with 2AP-substituted duplex DNA are shown in Fig. 3. M.EcoRI was preincubated with the cofactor analog sinefungin (43) prior to mixing with the DNA. The biphasic total intensity signal change (Fig. 3, upper panel) indicated that at least two kinetic processes were occurring. Approximately 75% of the observed signal increase was associated with a rate constant of 21 ± 2 s-1, and the remaining 25% slowly increasing at 0.6 s-1. Stopped flow total intensity data obtained with 0.6, 1.2, and 4.8 µM M.EcoRI each yielded nearly identical fractional amplitude changes (75 ± 2%) and rate constants for both phases. The fast phase of the 2AP fluorescence enhancement showed a weak dependence on enzyme concentration. In contrast, the slow phase was demonstrated to be concentration-independent. To directly determine the kinetic coupling between DNA binding and base flipping, spectroscopic binding anisotropy experiments were performed using oligonucleotides extrinsically labeled with the fluorescent probe Rhodamine-X. These stopped flow anisotropy experiments revealed that the fast 2AP fluorescence increase occurred subsequent to a more rapid DNA binding event.3 The combined results show that for the adenine-specific M.EcoRI, the base flipping process does not involve the capture of an extrahelical base but rather occurs subsequent to the assembly of the enzyme onto the target DNA site.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Time course of DNA binding, base flipping, and complex dissociation by M.EcoRI. The fluorescence signal being monitored is from DNA containing 2AP substituted at the target base and the measured fluorescence intensity is normalized to the measured signals at t = 0 and t = infinity . Upper panel, stopped flow reaction initiated at 20 °C by mixing equal volumes of 2.4 µM M.EcoRI (preincubated with 200 µM sinefungin) and 0.8 µM duplex DNA in a buffer containing 100 mM NaCl, 100 mM Tris, 10 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, pH 7.5. The inset shows total intensity data collected during the initial 300 ms of the experiment. Lower panel, kinetic off-rate data obtained following rapid mixing of a preformed M.EcoRI-DNA ternary complex (1.2 µM enzyme, 0.8 µM 2AP-containing DNA, 100 µM sinefungin) with an equal volume of 100 µM abasic double-stranded 14-mer. Data were fit using non-linear least squares (44) and required two exponentials (smooth line through the data in the upper and lower panels). Flip on data (upper panel) were best described using (time in s) 75% exp.(-21t) + 25% exp.(-0.6t); flip off data (lower panel) were best described using: 70% exp.(-0.0017t) + 30% exp.(-0.011t). Note the different time axis between the upper and lower panels.

Because the intrastrand base stacking of 2AP within the DNA contributes significantly to the quenching of this probe (20), the dominant (75%) fast phase was probably associated with a transition that directly disrupted base stacking interactions (i.e. the base flipping phase). This phase occurred at a rate nearly identical to the measured kmethylation (24 ± 5 s-1) determined for hemimethylated DNA by rapid chemical quench-flow methods (16). The slow (0.6 s-1) intramolecular transition may reflect a rearrangement of the extrahelical base within the enzyme active site. The fact that the relative amplitudes of both phases are concentration-independent is consistent with a sequential base flipping mechanism. Thus, the biphasic nature of the total intensity increase (Fig. 3, upper panel) may be the result of a sequential process involving rapid targeted base stacking disruption, transition of the unstacked base to the active site pocket, and finally reorientation of the extrahelical base within the enzyme active site.

Base Restacking and Enzyme-DNA Complex Dissociation-- Further support for the existence of two intramolecular kinetic phases associated with the base flipping process was obtained by examination of the off-rate kinetics. Rapid mixing of a preformed M.EcoRI-2AP-containing DNA complex with a 100-fold molar excess of the tightly bound abasic DNA duplex (Fig. 2) resulted in a biphasic decrease in the 2AP total intensity (Fig. 3, lower panel). Double exponential solutions (30% exp.(-0.011t) + 70% exp.(-0.0017t)) were statistically superior to monophasic fits at a confidence level >99.99% using an F-statistic test criterion (44). This fluorescence quenching clearly reflects the restacking of the extrahelical base within the DNA double helix. Interestingly the recovered off-rate amplitudes from this "flip off" experiment match very closely with the observed amplitudes (75% fast, 25% slow) associated with the 2AP "flip on" experiment (Fig. 3, upper panel). Although the coupling between base restacking and complex dissociation is not known, base restacking or a prior conformational change is probably the rate-limiting step for turnover. Comparison of the KDDNA determined for the 2AP-substituted DNA duplex (0.51 nM, Fig. 2) with the two predicted dissociation constants (0.10 and 0.68 nM) obtained from the ratio of the measured kinetic dissociation constants (Fig. 3, lower panel) and association rate constant3 shows that these results are internally consistent. The two off-rate phases suggest that two DNA-bound enzyme forms are in equilibrium on the DNA and that enzyme dissociation requires the interconversion from a tightly bound form to one that dissociates rapidly.

Discrimination at the Binding Orientation Level-- Single-turnover experiments initiated from the enzyme-AdoMet complex indicate that hemimethylated DNA is methylated to only 50% of the level of unmethylated DNA (16). These data suggest that under presteady-state conditions the monomeric M.EcoRI binds the asymmetric hemimethylated target site with equal probability in both orientations, leading to catalysis or the assembly of an unproductive dead end product complex. To confirm and extend these observations at the level of the base flipping step, stopped flow total intensity data were obtained with DNA that has the 2AP probe incorporated in place of the adenine adjacent to a methylated (N6-methyladenosine) target base (Fig. 4). The exponential increase in total intensity (Fig. 4) shows that 2AP adjacent to the target base became partially unstacked in the enzyme-DNA complex. The total intensity increase was approximately 5-fold less than with 2AP substitutions at the target base and only required a single exponential (5.7 s-1) analysis. This lack of a biphasic fluorescence enhancement further supports a sequential mechanism involving two distinct conformational transitions at the flipped base. The observed rate at which the methylated adenine became unstacked was significantly slower than kmethylation. Interestingly, the dynamics of spontaneous base pair opening measured by hydrogen exchange are slowed down by adenine methylation (45, 51). The incorporation of the 2AP probe adjacent or opposite to the target base might be a useful strategy to investigate the nucleotide flipping process for other DNA modification or repair enzymes.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Unstacking of the N6 methyladenosine monitored by placing the 2AP probe adjacent to the target base. Reactions conditions were identical to the upper panel of Fig. 3 with the exception that duplex DNA containing the 2AP probe incorporated (on the opposite strand) adjacent to a methylated target base was utilized in the stopped flow.

Implications of this Work-- Our model relating site-specific DNA binding, complex isomerization, methyl-transfer, and product release by M.EcoRI is depicted in Scheme ins;2123s1}I. DNA binding is shown in a multi-step mechanism involving the rapid formation of a "loosely" bound site-specific encounter complex, followed by one or more conformational changes within the enzyme-DNA complex. Because the majority of the base flipping transition occurred at a rate similar to kmethylation (16), all of the conformational changes required for catalysis must also be complete within this time frame. In addition to stabilizing an extrahelical base, M.EcoRI bends the DNA by 52 ° (39). DNA bending may occur simultaneously (46) with complex formation and possibly strain the DNA to destabilize the target base pair and induce base stacking disruption. Alternatively, DNA bending may occur in a sequential mechanism following site-specific complex formation or subsequent to base extrusion. Because the extrahelical conformation of the target base is clearly the preferred orientation at equilibrium (7), the rapid methyl-transfer step during the modification of the target site (5'-GAATTC-3') indicates that the chemistry step has a high degree of commitment. Initial binding of the canonical site by M.EcoRI leads to an active configuration of the enzyme-DNA complex where the key catalytic residues converge into an alignment compatible with transition state stabilization. A value of >200 s-1 is tentatively assigned to the chemistry step because this step is likely to be greater than 10-fold faster than the prior first-order isomerization (21 s-1). Because the rate of base flipping is approximately 50-fold slower than the rate of spontaneous 2AP:T base pair opening (1000 s-1) (35), enzyme-assisted and spontaneous base pair opening most likely occur by different pathways. Although the base flipping trajectory for M.EcoRI is not known, the C5 cytosine-specific DNA methyltransferases extrude the target base via the DNA minor groove (3, 5). This trajectory is distinct from the major groove route predicted to mediate spontaneous base pair opening (47). Although base flipping clearly occurs subsequent to complex formation, the ensuing events remain obscure.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Scheme I.   Proposed catalytic cycle showing DNA binding, isomerization, methyl-transfer, and product release for M.EcoRI. Site-specific binding of the target site (E-DNAS) by M.EcoRI is followed by isomerization of the complex into a conformation activated for catalysis (E-DNAS'). Methylation of the extrahelical base occurs rapidly subsequent to the stabilization of the target adenine within the enzyme active site. The chemistry step (kmethylation) is followed by a slow dissociation of the enzyme from the methylated DNA product (DNAM). a, from Reich and Mashoon (50).

The precatalytic isomerization of the enzyme-DNA complex is likely to serve as a determinant of enzyme discrimination between competing DNA sites. Because the investment of binding free energy required to contort the DNA into a catalytically activated conformation is probably sequence-dependent, discrimination may be modulated by the energetic cost of DNA distortion. A different or additional level of discrimination may be revealed at the transition state if the assembly of the active residues is also sensitive to sequence-specific enzyme-DNA interaction. For M.EcoRI the chemistry step (kmethylation) is significantly faster than turnover (16). A burst of product formation, followed by a steady-state increase in product accumulation is observed in a typical presteady-state experiment where the concentration of the substrate is 5-fold greater than that of the enzyme. However, no burst of product formation is detected with certain closely related sites (e.g. 5'-AAATTC-3'),4 showing that a step prior to product release is rate-limiting. Furthermore, the kcat/Km observed for the methylation of non-target sites is decreased up to 20,000-fold (48). Thus, the overall discrimination against non-target site methylation is likely to be mediated at the level of the precatalytic isomerization and the chemistry step. The formation and interconversion among the conformationally distinct structural intermediates would serve to enhance sequence specificity relative to an enzyme that does not partition among multiple enzyme-DNA intermediates. Ultimately, a quantitative understanding of enzyme discrimination demands knowledge of the relative magnitude of both of these energetic barriers toward the modification of target and non-target sites.

The stabilization of an extrahelical base circumvents the problem of catalyzing a stereo-specific reaction at sterically occluded DNA bases or target lesions. For AdoMet-dependent enzymes, base flipping minimizes DNA-cofactor interaction by removing the bound AdoMet from the enzyme-DNA interface. This permits site-specific methylation at many different DNA sequences, which might otherwise not be possible if sequence-specific recognition elements involved the bound AdoMet molecule. This expansion of the recognition sequence diversity is not without energetic consequence. DNA methyltransferases typically bind DNA significantly less tightly than the related restriction endonucleases or repressor type proteins. The free energy differences separating the closed and open forms of the base pair and the large activation enthalpy (5-25 kcal mol-1) associated with spontaneous base pair opening (49) provide a rationale for the differences in equilibrium binding affinities observed for these distinct classes of proteins. In conclusion, direct real time observation and rigorous solution-based characterization of the nucleotide flipping process allows mechanistic investigation into the origin of sequence specificity and enzyme discrimination derived from this dramatic protein-nucleic acid interaction.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Prof. Stanley M. Parsons and Asst. Prof. John Perona for enlightening discussion and critical review of the manuscript. We also thank Jason Sutin for technical assistance.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant MCB-9603567 (to N. O. R.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 805-893-8368; Fax: 805-893-4120; E-mail: reich{at}sbmm1.ucsb.edu.

1 The abbreviations used are: M.EcoRI, EcoRI DNA N6 adenine methyltransferase; DTT, dithiothreitol; 2AP, 2-aminopurine; 2,6-DAP, 2,6-diaminopurine; AdoMet, S-adenosyl-L-methionine.

2 Although structural reorganization cannot be confirmed directly utilizing a gel mobility shift assay, several lines of evidence support the hypothesis that the M.EcoRI-DNA complexes have undergone structural isomerization. M.EcoRI-assisted extrahelical stabilization of the 2AP probe (7) and DNA bending (39) were both detected under similar conditions as these KDDNA measurements. In addition, M.EcoRI methylates 2,6-DAP-substituted DNA (30), which clearly requires the stabilization of the modified target base within the enzyme active site.

3 Rhodamine-X labeled oligonucleotides are the preferred substrate to measure changes in anisotropy associated with complex formation because data can be obtained at the picomolar to nanomolar range and no changes in the fluorescence lifetime are observed. These experiments revealed that the second-order collision complex is formed with a rate constant of 1.6 × 107 M-1 s-1 (B. W. Allan, J. M. Beechem, and N. O. Reich, manuscript in preparation).

4 N. O. Reich and K. Maegley, unpublished data.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

  1. Steitz, T. A. (1990) Q. Rev. Biophys. 23, 205-280[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Pabo, P. O., and Sauer, R. T. (1992) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 61, 1053-1095[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Klimasauskas, S., Kumar, S., Roberts, R. J., Cheng, X. (1994) Cell 76, 357-369[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Slupphaug, G., Mol, C. D., Kavli, B., Arvai, A. S., Krokan, H. E., Tainer, J. A. (1996) Nature 384, 87-92[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Reinisch, K. M., Chen, L., Verdine, G. L., Lipscomb, W. N. (1995) Cell 82, 143-153[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Vassylyev, D. G., Kashiwagi, T., Mikami, Y., Ariyoshi, M., Iwai, S., Ohtsuka, E., and Morikawa, K. (1995) Cell 83, 773-782[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Allan, B. W., and Reich, N. O. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 14757-14762[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Cheng, X., and Blumenthal, R. M. (1996) Structure 4, 639-645[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Seeman, N. C., Rosenberg, J. M., and Rich, A. (1976) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 73, 804-808[Abstract]
  10. Klimasauskas, S., and Roberts, R. J. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 1388-1395[Abstract]
  11. Yang, S. A., Jiang-Cheng, S., Zingg, J. M., Mi, S., Jones, P. A. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 1380-1387[Abstract]
  12. Cal, S., and Connolly, B. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 1008-1015[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Sibghat-Ullah, Gallinari, P., Xu, Y. Z., Goodman, M. F., Bloom, L. B., Jiricny, J., Day, R. S. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 12926-12932[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Lu, A. L., Tsai-Wu, J. J, and Cillo, J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 23582-23588[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Rubin, R. A., and Modrich, P. (1977) J. Biol. Chem. 252, 7265-7272[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Reich, N. O., and Mashoon, N. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 9191-9193[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Pogolotti, A. L., Ono, A., Subramaniam, R., and Santi, D. V. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 7461-7464[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ho, D. K., Wu, W. C., Santi, D. V., Heinz, F. G. (1991) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 284, 264-269[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Malone, T., Blumenthal, R. M., and Cheng, X. (1995) J. Mol. Biol. 253, 618-632[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Ward, D. C., Reich, E., and Stryer, L. (1969) J. Biol. Chem. 244, 1228-1237[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Bloom, L. B., Otto, M. R., Beechem, J. M., Goodman, M. F. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 11247-11258[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Bloom, L. B., Otto, M. R., Eritja, R., Reha-Krantz, L. J., Goodman, M. F., Beechem, J. M. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 7576-7586[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Dunkak, K. S., Otto, M. R., and Beechem, J. M. (1996) Anal. Biochem. 243, 234-244[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Sastry, S. S., and Ross, B. M. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 15715-15725[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Raney, K. D., Sowers, L. C., Millar, D. P., Benkovic, S. J. (1994) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 6644-6648[Abstract]
  26. Bjornson, K. P., Wong, I., and Lohman, T. M. (1996) J. Mol. Biol. 263, 411-422[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Menger, M., Tuschl, T., Eckstein, F., and Porschke, D. (1996) Biochemistry 34, 14710-14716[CrossRef]
  28. Sowers, L. C., Fazakerley, G. V., Eritja, R., Kaplan, B. E., Goodman, M. F. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 5434-5438[Abstract]
  29. Nordlund, T. M., Andersson, S., Nilsson, L., Rigler, R., Graslund, A., and McLaughlin, L. W. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 9095-9103[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Brennan, C. A., Van Cleve, M. D., and Gumport, R. I. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 7270-7278[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Greene, P. J., Heyneker, H. L., Bolivar, F., Rodriquez, R. L., Betlach, M. C., Covarrubias, A. A., Backman, K., Russel, D. J., Tait, R., Boyer, H. W. (1978) Nucleic Acids Res. 5, 2373-2380[Abstract]
  32. Fasman, G. D. (ed) (1975) Handbook of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 3rd. Ed., Vol. II, p. 589, CRC Press, Cleveland, OH
  33. Reich, N. O., and Danzitz, M. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 1937-1945[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Surby, M. A., and Reich, N. O. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 2209-2217[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Lycksell, P. O., Graslund, A., Claesens, F., McLaughlin, L. W., Larsson, U., Rigler, R. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 9011-9025[Abstract]
  36. Coll, M., Wang, A. H.-J., van der Marel, G. A., van Boom, J. H., Rich, A. (1986) J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 4, 157-172[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Chazin, W. J., Rance, M., Chollet, A., and Leupin, W. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 5507-5513[Abstract]
  38. Brennan, C. A., and Gumport, R. I. (1985) Nucleic Acids Res. 13, 8665-8684[Abstract]
  39. Garcia, R., Bustamante, C., and Reich, N. O. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 7618-7622[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Labahn, J., Granzin, J., Schluckebier, G., Robinson, D. P., Jack, W. E., Schildkraut, I., Sanger, W. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 10957-10961[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Adams, G. M., and Blumenthal, R. M. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 8284-8292[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Gong, W., O' Gara, M. O., Blumenthal, R. M., Cheng, X. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 2702-2715[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Reich, N. O., and Mashoon, N. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 8966-8970[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Beechem, J. M. (1992) Methods Enzymol. 210, 37-53[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Quignard, E., Fazakerley, G. V., Teoule, R., Guy, A., and Guschlbauer, W. (1985) Eur. J. Biochem. 152, 99-105[Abstract]
  46. Parkhurst, K. M., Brenowitz, M., and Parkhurst, L. J. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 7459-7465[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Ramstein, J., and Lavery, R. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 10957-10961[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Reich, N. O., Olsen, C., Osti, F., and Murphy, J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 15802-15807[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Moe, J. G., and Russo, I. M. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 8421-8428[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Reich, N. O., and Mashoon, N. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 2933-2939[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  51. Fazakerley, G. V., Teoule, R., Guy, A., Fritzsche, H., and Guschlbauer, W. (1985) Biochemistry 24, 4540-4548[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.