Interaction of Cysteine String Proteins with the alpha 1A Subunit of the P/Q-type Calcium Channel*

Christian Leveque, Sandrine Pupier, Beatrice Marqueze, Lionel Geslin, Masakazu KataokaDagger , Masami TakahashiDagger , Michel De Waard, and Michael Seagar§

From the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité 464, Institut Jean Roche, Faculté de Médecine Secteur Nord, Bd. Pierre Dramard, 13916 Marseille Cedex 20, France and the Dagger  Mitsubishi Kasei Institute of Life Science, Machida,Tokyo 194, Japan

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Cysteine string proteins (Csps) are J-domain chaperone proteins anchored at the surface of synaptic vesicles. Csps are involved in neurotransmitter release and may modulate presynaptic calcium channel activity, although the molecular mechanisms are unknown. Interactions between Csps, proteins of the synaptic core (SNARE) complex, and P/Q-type calcium channels were therefore explored. Co-immunoprecipitation suggested that Csps occur in complexes containing synaptobrevin (VAMP), but not syntaxin 1, SNAP-25, nor P/Q-type calcium channels labeled with 125I-omega -conotoxin MVIIC. However binding experiments with 35S-labeled Csp1 demonstrated an interaction (apparent KD = 700 nM at pH 7.4 and 4 °C) with a fusion protein containing a segment of the cytoplasmic loop linking homologous domains II-III of the alpha 1A calcium channel subunit (BI isoform, residues 780-969). Binding was specific as it was displaced by unlabeled Csp1, and no interactions were detected with fusion proteins containing other calcium channel domains, VAMP, or syntaxin 1A. A Csp binding site on the P/Q-type calcium channel is thus located within the 200 residue synaptic protein interaction site that can also bind syntaxin I, SNAP-25, and synaptotagmin I. Csp may act as a molecular chaperone to direct assembly or disassembly of exocytotic complexes at the calcium channel.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Cysteine string proteins (Csps)1 were initially discovered in Drosophila as neuronal antigens predominantly localized in synaptic regions (1). Subsequently Csps were identified in Torpedo (2) and mammals (3-5). Csps contain a fatty acylated cysteine-rich motif (6) and are associated with the cytoplasmic surface of secretory vesicles (7-10). The NH2-terminal region of Csps constitutes a J-domain with homology to bacterial DnaJ proteins that act as chaperones. Mammalian Csps cooperate with the heat shock protein (Hsc70), activating its ATPase activity and preventing aggregation of model protein substrates (11, 12).

The association of Csps with synaptic vesicles (7, 10) suggests that they are involved in membrane trafficking and/or exocytosis of neurotransmitters. Deletion of the cspc gene in Drosophila causes temperature-sensitive failure of synaptic transmission, resulting in paralysis (13) due to impaired excitation-secretion coupling at nerve terminals (14, 15). Recent findings suggest that the default involves either a deficit in calcium entry or in the ability of calcium to trigger exocytosis (16). These data are thus consistent with earlier results indicating that Csps act as positive modulators of omega -conotoxin GVIA-sensitive calcium channels from Torpedo electric organ, heterologously expressed in Xenopus oocytes (2). Fusion competent synaptic vesicles are thought to be docked at the active zone in close proximity to the voltage-gated calcium channels that trigger release. It has been proposed that interactions between calcium channels and Csps may be necessary for the channels associated with docked vesicles to open in response to depolarization (7), although biochemical evidence in favor of this interaction has not been reported. We have therefore examined the molecular interactions of Csp with proteins of the synaptic core (SNARE) complex (17) and P/Q-type calcium channels, which support a major fraction of transmitter release in many synaptic fields of the mammalian brain (18).

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Recombinant Proteins-- A maltose-binding protein (MBP)-Csp1 fusion protein was prepared (10) and purified by affinity chromatography on an amylose column (New England Biolabs). Glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins containing domains of the rabbit brain calcium channel alpha 1A (BI-2 isoform) subunit (19), syntaxin 1A, VAMP 2, and synaptotagmin IV were generated as reported previously (20, 21). A GST fusion protein, including sequence from the III-IV loop of alpha 1A, was constructed by amplifiying base pairs 4561-4725 and subcloning into pGEXKG. Fusion protein production was induced in cultures of the protease-deficient Escherichia coli strain BL21, and lysates were purified with glutathione-agarose. 35S-Csp1 was synthesized by coupled transcription and translation in vitro, in the presence of [35S]cysteine (>600 Ci/mmol, DuPont), using the TNTTM system (Promega).

Immunoprecipitation Assays-- Polyclonal antibodies against MBP-Csp1 (10) were purified on protein A-Sepharose Fast Flow beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Immunoprecipitation of 125I-omega -conotoxin MVIIC-labeled P/Q-type calcium channels from CHAPS extracts of a rat cerebellar P2 fraction was performed as described previously (22).

35S-Csp1 was incubated for 2 h at 4 °C with 10 µg of anti-Csp antibodies in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 0.3% (w/v) BSA. 35S-Csp·antibody complexes were then recovered by mixing with protein A-Sepharose Fast Flow beads for 1 h at 4 °C, centrifuging for 30 s at 10000 × g, and then washed three times in TBS, 0.3% BSA. The washed pellet was resuspended in 10 ml of scintillation solvant, and 35S-Csp binding was quantified by scintillation counting.

Binding Assays-- Binding assays were performed by incubating GST fusion proteins with in vitro-translated 35S-Csp in 300 µl of TBS containing 0.5% BSA at 4 °C in the presence of 30 µl glutathione-agarose beads (20, 21). Beads were washed three times by centrifugation with the same buffer, and 35S-Csp binding was quantified by scintillation counting.

Rat brain homogenates were solubilized in 1% of the indicated detergent (see figure legends) in 10 mM Hepes, 0.15 M NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, adjusted to pH 7.4 with NaOH, and incubated for 5 h at 4 °C with GST or GST fusion proteins bound to glutathione-agarose beads. Beads were then washed once with TBS containing 0.3% BSA and once with TBS, and bound Csp was detected by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting (10).

Surface Plasmon Resonance Spectroscopy-- Spectroscopy was performed on a BIAcore apparatus (Pharmacia Biosensor), with GST fusion proteins immobilized on the sensor chip via covalently linked anti-GST antibodies. 2 µM MBP-Csp or MBP were introduced at a flow rate of 5 µl/min at 22 °C.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Experiments were performed in order to explore the molecular mechanisms by which Csps may modulate exocytosis. First we performed co-immunoprecipitation experiments to examine the hypothesis that Csps may associate with components of the trimeric synaptic core (SNARE) complex and/or presynaptic P/Q-type calcium channels.

Co-immunoprecipitation Experiments Reveal Protein Complexes Containing Csp and VAMP-- Rat brain membranes were solubilized with CHAPS, and detergent extracts were incubated with non-immune immunoglobulins, polyclonal antibodies raised against Csp1 in the absence and presence of MBP-Csp1, and polyclonal anti-VAMP antibodies. Immune complexes were recovered on protein A-Sepharose beads, washed, and eluted with SDS-PAGE sample buffer. Western blots were prepared and probed with antibodies directed against Csp1, syntaxin 1, synaptosomal associated 25-kDa protein (SNAP-25) and VAMP. Anti-Csp antibodies were found to co-immunoprecipitate a small fraction of the total VAMP, but neither syntaxin 1 nor SNAP-25 was detected (Fig. 1). Immunoprecipitation was specific as an added excess of MBP-Csp1-blocked recovery of both Csp and VAMP. Conversely, when membrane extracts were incubated with an anti-VAMP antibody, Csp and the three SNARE proteins were all identified among the immunoprecipitated proteins (Fig. 1). These experiments suggest that anti-Csp antibodies trap protein complexes containing Csp and VAMP but not syntaxin 1 nor SNAP-25, whereas anti-VAMP antibodies recover both Csp/VAMP complexes and synaptic core complexes of VAMP, syntaxin 1, and SNAP-25. While this approach demonstrates that a small population of complexes containing Csp and VAMP does occur, it does not indicate whether these proteins interact directly or indirectly via unidentified protein partners. Cross-linking experiments were performed with the bifunctional reagent disuccinimidyl suberate, but failed to reveal complexes between Csp and VAMP or other proteins. Furthermore binding experiments with in vitro translated 35S-Csp1 and immobilized GST-VAMP 2 did not provide any support for a direct interaction between these two proteins (see below).


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Co-immunoprecipitation of cysteine string proteins and VAMP. Rat brain homogenates were solubilized in 1% CHAPS, 0.32 M sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Hepes/NaOH pH 7.4, cleared by filtration (0.22-µm pore), and incubated with antibodies or control IgG, in the presence or absence of MBP-Csp. Immune complexes were recovered on protein A-Sepharose beads, and Csp, syntaxin 1, SNAP-25, and VAMP were detected by Western blotting. The lane labeled "Total" was loaded with <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>20</DE></FR> of the amount of protein subjected to immunoprecipitation assay in the other lanes.

Immunoprecipitation Fails to Detect Complexes Containing Csps and P/Q-type Calcium Channels-- A crude synaptosomal (P2) fraction from rat cerebellum was incubated with 125I-omega -conotoxin MVIIC in conditions that allow specific labeling of P/Q-type calcium channels and then extracted with CHAPS (22). As reported previously prelabeled channels were immunoprecipitated by the monoclonal anti-syntaxin 1 antibody 10H5 (Fig. 2) (22). In contrast anti-Csp antibodies failed to capture solubilized 125I-omega -conotoxin MVIIC receptors. The amount of radioactivity immunoprecipitated by anti-Csp antibodies was not significantly different from that in control assays in which anti-Csp antibodies were preincubated with a large excess of MBP-Csp1 or in which non-immune rabbit IgG was used. As this approach did not detect interactions between endogenous Csps and P/Q-type calcium channels, experiments were performed with recombinant proteins.


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Csp is not associated with native P/Q-type calcium channels. Rat cerebellar P2 membranes were incubated with 0.3 nM 125I-omega -conotoxin MVIIC to label P/Q-type calcium channels. Membranes were washed and channel-ligand complexes were extracted with 1% CHAPS. Detergent extracts were incubated with antibodies, immune complexes were recovered on protein A-Sepharose beads and immunoprecipitated, calcium channels quantified by gamma  counting. Results are the mean of at least three independent assays; error bars represent ± S.D.

Binding of 35S-Csp to the II-III Linker Region of the Calcium Channel alpha 1A Subunit-- 35S-Csp1 was produced by coupled transcription and translation in vitro in the presence of [35S]cysteine. SDS-PAGE and autoradiography revealed a single major radioactive species migrating at 28 kDa in accordance with the predicted molecular mass of Csp (Fig. 3A, left panel). Furthermore radioactivity was immunoprecipitated by anti-Csp antibodies but not by non-immune immunoglobulins (Fig. 3A, right panel). SDS-PAGE and protein staining indicated that the predominant forms of MBP-Csp1, MBP, GST-II-IIIA, and GST (Fig. 3B) migrated at 70, 43, 48, and 27 kDa respectively, consistent with apparent molecular masses of 27 kDa for Csp1, and 21 kDa for a polypeptide from the calcium channel II-III linker region corresponding to residues 780-969 of the BI isoform of the alpha 1A subunit.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Csp interacts with a cytoplasmic domain of P/Q-type calcium channels. A, 35S-Csp1 was prepared by in vitro translation in the presence of [35S]cysteine. Translation products were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography (left panel) and immunoprecipitation with anti-Csp antibodies (right panel). B, MBP-Csp1, MBP, GST-II-IIIA, and GST were purified from E. coli lysates and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie Blue protein staining. Black triangles indicate apparent molecular masses. C, 35S-Csp1 was incubated with the indicated concentrations of GST-II-IIIA (black circles) or GST (open circles). Fusion proteins were trapped on glutathione-Sepharose beads, washed by centrifugation, and bound 35S-Csp1 quantified by scintillation counting. D, similar experiments were performed with the indicated fusion proteins (1 µM) in the presence or absence of MBP-Csp. Results are the mean of at least three independent assays; error bars represent ± S.D.

Binding experiments were then performed in which 35S-Csp1 was incubated with a range of concentrations of GST-II-IIIA or GST. Thus in this assay 35S-Csp1 is considered as being the binding site and the GST fusion protein as the ligand. Saturable binding of GST-II-IIIA occurred with an apparent equilibrium dissociation constant of 700 nM (Fig. 3C). Interaction was specific as binding was not detected with an identical concentration range of GST. Furthermore the addition of a large molar excess of MBP-Csp1 inhibited the association of 35S-Csp1 with the GST-II-III loop (Fig. 3D). No significant binding to 35S-Csp1 was detected with GST fusion proteins containing VAMP 2, syntaxin 1A, domains from the I-II or III-IV linker regions (Fig. 3D), or from the amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions (not shown) of the alpha 1A subunit.

Surface plasmon resonance experiments using a Biacore apparatus to detect interactions between recombinant proteins also confirmed MBP-Csp1 binding to GST-II-IIIA immobilized on a sensor chip via covalently linked anti-GST antibodies (not shown). Binding monitored by this method was again specific for the II-III domain of the alpha 1A subunit, as control experiments did not reveal interactions between MBP and GST-II-IIIA, nor between MBP-Csp1 and other cytoplasmic domains of the alpha 1A subunit fused to GST.

Interactions between Recombinant and Endogenous Synaptic Proteins-- Preliminary surface plasmon resonance experiments indicated that the binding of Csp to the GST-II-IIIA fusion protein was diminished in the presence of CHAPS. The effect of a series of detergents (digitonin, cholate, Lubrol, Triton X-100, Nonidet P-40, CHAPS) on the interaction of 35S-Csp1 with the GST-II-IIIA was examined. All the detergents tested (at 1%, w/v) inhibited binding by 60-80% (not shown). As detergent concentrations within this range are required to solubilize native calcium channels from brain membranes, it is possible that dissociation of endogenous Csp/calcium channel complexes by detergents may account for our inability to detect interactions by co-immunoprecipitation (see Fig. 2). In order to examine this possibility the interaction of recombinant calcium channel domains with native Csp was studied. Detergent extracts of P2 membranes from rat brain were incubated with either GST-II-IIIA, GST-III-IVA, or GST immobilized on glutathione-Sepharose beads. After washing, beads were recovered by centrifugation, treated with SDS-PAGE sample buffer, and the eluted proteins analyzed by Western blotting with anti-Csp antibodies (Fig. 4A). This approach demonstrated that endogenous Csp associated specifically with the GST-II-IIIA fusion protein despite the presence of CHAPS, Nonidet P-40, or Triton X-100.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Interactions between endogenous and recombinant proteins A. Rat brain homogenates were solubilized in the indicated detergents at 1%, w/v, and aliquots were mixed with GST-II-IIIA, GST-III-IVA, or GST bound to glutathione-Sepharose beads. After washing, bound Csp was detected by Western blotting. B, detergent extracts containing prelabeled P/Q-type calcium channels were incubated with protein-A Sepharose beads coupled to anti-syntaxin 1 antibodies or amylose beads coupled to MBP-Csp, MBP-synaptotagmin IV, or MBP. Following washing bound calcium channel-radioligand complexes were quantified by gamma  counting. Results are the mean of at least three independent assays; error bars represent ± S.D.

Similar experiments were performed to examine whether endogenous P/Q-type calcium channels interact with recombinant Csp. MBP-Csp1 and control proteins were immobilized on amylose beads and incubated under agitation with CHAPS extracts of synaptic membranes containing native calcium channels prelabeled with 125I-omega -conotoxin MVIIC. P/Q-type calcium channels were captured by immobilized anti-syntaxin 1 antibodies, but not by MBP-Csp beads. Furthermore the quantity of solubilized calcium channels trapped by MBP-Csp1 beads was not significantly different from that bound by beads linked to MBP alone or fused to synaptotagmin IV (Fig. 4B).

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Evidence points to an essential role for Csps in the synaptic release of neurotransmitters (13, 14) and suggests that they are involved in regulating the ability of presynaptic calcium channels to open in response to membrane depolarization (2, 16). We thus asked whether Csps interact with components of the trimeric synaptic core complex and/or the P/Q-type calcium channel. The synaptic core (SNARE) complex is composed of a synaptic vesicle protein: synaptobrevin (VAMP) and two proteins that are predominantly expressed in the synaptic plasma membrane: syntaxin 1 and SNAP-25 (17). This complex is thought constitute the hub of a sequence of protein/protein interactions that lead up to calcium-dependent exocytosis (reviewed in Refs. 23 and 24). SNARE complexes associate with P/Q-type calcium channels (22, 25) and co-expression of syntaxin 1 with P/Q-type channels in Xenopus oocytes modulates channel gating properties (26). It is therefore possible that Csp may regulate both exocytosis and calcium channel function by interacting with components of the SNARE complex. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed complexes containing Csp and VAMP, but not syntaxin 1 or SNAP-25. Synaptophysin, which interacts with VAMP in synaptic vesicles (27), was not identified among proteins immunoprecipitated by anti-Csp antibodies (not shown). Direct binding between recombinant Csp1 and VAMP 2 was not detected. However in vitro translated and bacterially expressed Csps are not palmitoylated, and a direct interaction between Csps and VAMP could require fatty acylation. These data are thus consistent with either a direct interaction between native Csp and VAMP or an indirect association mediated by unidentified partners.

The calcium-conducting pore of P/Q-type calcium channels is formed by the alpha 1A subunit, which contains four homologous domains each composed of six helical transmembrane segments (19). A GST-fusion protein containing a domain located in the cytoplasmic loop linking homologous domains II and III of the alpha 1A subunit displayed saturable binding to in vitro translated [35S]cysteine-labeled Csp. The affinity of this interaction is moderate with an apparent equilibrium dissociation constant of 700 nM at 4 °C and pH 7.4. Csp thus binds an approximately 200 residue segment on the alpha 1A subunit (residues 780-969 of the BI isoform). Specific interaction was confirmed using surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy, which indicated that MBP-Csp can bind to the same GST fusion protein immobilized on a sensor chip.

In view of the molecular chaperone activity of Csp, it is important to underline the specificity of binding. Hsp70 and DnaJ-like proteins act as chaperones and bind polypeptides, but with different selectivity. Hsp70 binds unfolded proteins recognizing short stretches of amino acids with an extended conformation. In contrast, DnaJ-like proteins such as Csp generally bind substrates exhibiting secondary and tertiary structure, but exhibit very low affinity for polypeptides in extended conformations (reviewed in Ref. 28). Our data demonstrate that recombinant Csp does not associate nonselectively with bacterially expressed proteins irrespective of their sequence, as Csp did not bind to GST alone, or GST fusion proteins containing syntaxin 1, VAMP 2, or other regions of the alpha 1A subunit. Furthermore it is reasonable to assume that the folding of in vitro translated proteins provides a closer approximation to native conformation than bacterially expressed proteins fused to large tag sequences. Although the illustrated binding data were obtained using in vitro translated Csp and GST-II-IIIA, we have also verified that in vitro translated [35S]methionine-labeled II-IIIA interacts with MBP-Csp1 (not shown). Thus specific binding occurs irrespective of which partner is generated by in vitro translation and which is a fusion protein. Finally it is significant that Csp binds selectively to a calcium channel domain strongly implicated in excitation-secretion coupling. This region of the alpha 1A subunit constitutes a binding site for syntaxin 1 and SNAP-25 (BI residues 722-1036, Ref. 25) and synaptotagmin I (BI residues 780-969, Ref. 21). The functional relevance of these interactions is supported by evidence that injection of the equivalent synaptic protein binding domain from the alpha 1B subunit (29) disrupts transmitter release in sympathetic neurons (30) and at the amphibian neuromuscular junction (31).

In contrast to experiments with recombinant proteins, immunoprecipitation with anti-Csp antibodies failed to capture P/Q-type calcium channels from detergent extracts of nerve terminals. This could be due to the masking of Csp epitopes by protein/protein interactions or alternatively to the disruption of native complexes during membrane solubilization. All detergents tested inhibited GST-II-IIIA fusion protein binding to 35S-Csp. However the presence of detergents in membrane extracts did not prevent endogenous Csps from interacting with GST-II-IIIA fusion proteins. In contrast native calcium channels did not bind to immobilized MBP-Csp, suggesting that a limiting parameter may be the accessibility of the Csp binding site on the calcium channel. Syntaxin 1, SNAP-25, and synaptotagmin I bind to the same domain on the calcium channel as Csp, and these three proteins all display a higher affinity than Csp for binding to calcium channels (25, 21). Furthermore a large fraction of native P/Q-type channels are stably associated with complexes containing syntaxin I, SNAP-25, VAMP, and synaptotagmin I or II (21, 22). SNARE complexes associated with native calcium channels may therefore prevent interaction with endogenous or exogenous Csps.

If Csps promote calcium channel opening by binding to the II-III linker region of the alpha 1A subunit, how may intrinsic chaperone activity and cooperation with Hsp70 be involved? Apart from their role in protein folding during translation, chaperones contribute to the assembly and dissociation of multi-protein complexes. Hsp70 (DnaK) and J-domain proteins (DnaJ) promote the assembly and stabilization of glucocorticoid aporeceptor complexes (reviewed in Ref. 32), the dissociation of complexes involved in bacteriophage lambda  DNA replication (reviewed in Ref. 33), and clathrin disassembly from coated vesicles (34). It is thus possible that Csps act as chaperones to promote assembly or disassembly of synaptic protein complexes associated with the II-III linker region of the calcium channel. Co-expression of syntaxin 1 with Q-type calcium channels decreases their availability for opening by stabilizing an inactivated state (26). Csps could in principle facilitate channel activation by promoting the dissociation of syntaxin. Our data indicate that Csps can interact directly with the P/Q-type calcium channel and also suggest an association with VAMP. We can speculate that Csp may coordinate sequential protein/protein interactions between syntaxin and two of its binding partners, calcium channels and VAMP, and consequently modulate channel opening and calcium-dependent exocytosis. It is interesting to note that a strikingly similar pattern of evoked synaptic responses results from either the disruption of SNARE protein interaction with calcium channels in rat sympathetic neurons (30) or the deletion of the Csp gene in motoneurones of Drosophila larvae (15). Both manipulations produced a reduction in synchronous transmitter release, while asynchronous release and paired pulse facilitation were increased. The regulation by Csp of SNARE protein interactions with calcium channels may thus be necessary to ensure synchronous synaptic transmission. Further studies will be necessary to examine whether the assembly of syntaxin 1-SNAP-25-VAMP-synaptotagmin complexes at the synaptic protein interaction site on the calcium channel is regulated by the chaperone activity of Csp and Hsp70.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by the International Human Frontiers Science Program and a grant (to S. P.) from the Institut Scientifique Roussel.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 33-491698929; Fax: 33-491090506; E-mail: seagar.m{at}jean-roche.univ-mrs.fr.

1 The abbreviations used are: Csp(s), cysteine string protein(s); Hsc70 or Hsp70, heat shock proteins; MBP, maltose-binding protein; GST, glutathione S-transferase; VAMP, vesicle-associated membrane protein or synaptobrevin; TBS, Tris-buffered saline; CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid; SNAP-25, synaptosomal associated 25-kDa protein; BSA, bovine serum albumin; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Zinsmaier, K. E., Hofbauer, A., Heimbeck, G., Pflugfelder, G. O., Buchner, S., and Buchner, E. (1990) J. Neurogenet. 7, 15-29[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Gundersen, C. B., and Umbach, J. A. (1992) Neuron 9, 527-537[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Mastrogiacomo, A., and Gundersen, C. B. (1995) Mol. Brain Res. 28, 12-18[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Chamberlain, L. H., and Burgoyne, R. D. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 7320-7323[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Coppola, T., and Gundersen, C. (1996) FEBS Lett. 391, 269-272[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Gundersen, C. B., Mastrogiacomo, A., Faull, K., and Umbach, J. A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 19197-19199[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Mastrogiacomo, A, Parsons, S. M., Zampighi, G. A., Jenden, D. J., Umbach, J. A., and Gundersen, C. B. (1994) Science 263, 981-982[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Kohan, S. A., Pescatori, M., Brecha, N. C., Mastrogiacomo, A., Umbach, J. A., and Gundersen, C. B. (1995) J. Neurosci. 15, 6230-6238[Abstract]
  9. Chamberlain, L. H., Henry, J., and Burgoyne, R. D. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 19514-19517[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Pupier, S., Leveque, C., Marqueze, B., Kataoka, M., Takahashi, M., and Seagar, M. (1997) J. Neurosci. 17, 2722-2727[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Braun, J. E. A., Wilbanks, S. M., and Scheller, R. H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 25989-25993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Chamberlain, L. H., and Burgoyne, R. D. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 31420-31426[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Zinsmaier, K. E., Eberle, K. K., Buchner, E., Walter, N., and Benzer, S. (1994) Science 263, 977-980[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Umbach, J. A., Zinsmaier, K. E., Eberle, K. K., Buchner, E., Benzer, S., and Gundersen, C. B. (1994) Neuron 13, 899-907[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Heckmann, M., Adelsberger, H., and Dudel, J. (1997) Neurosci. Lett. 228, 167-170[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Umbach, J. A., and Gundersen, C. B. (1997) J. Neurosci. 17, 7203-7209[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Sollner, T., Whiteheart, S. W., Brunner, M., Erdjument-Bromage, H., Geromanos, S., Tempst, P., and Rothman, J. E. (1993) Nature 362, 318-324[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Wheeler, D. B., Randall, A., and Tsien, R. W. (1994) Science 258, 917-924
  19. Mori, Y., Friedrich, T., Kim, M. S., Mikami, A., Nakai, J., Ruth, P., Bosse, E., Homann, F., Flockerzi, V., Furuichi, T., Mikoshiba, K., Imoto, K., Tanabe, T., and Numa, S. (1991) Nature 350, 398-402[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. De Waard, M., Liu, H., Walker, D., Scott, V. E., Gurnett, C. A., and Campbell, K. P. (1997) Nature 385, 446-450[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Charvin, N., Lévêque, C., Walker, D., Berton, F., Raymond, C., Kataoka, M., Shoji-Kasai, Y., Takahashi, M., De Waard, M., and Seagar, M. J. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 4591-4596[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Martin-Moutot, N., Charvin, N., Leveque, C., Sato, K., Nishiki, T., Kozaki, S., Takahashi, M., and Seagar, M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 6567-6570[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Südhof, T. C. (1995) Nature 375, 645-653[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Bajjalieh, S. M., and Scheller, R. H. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 1971-1974[Free Full Text]
  25. Rettig, J., Sheng, Z. H., Kim, D. K., Hodson, C. D., Snutch, T. P., and Catterall, W. A. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 7363-7368[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Bezprozvanny, I., Scheller, R. H., and Tsien, R. W. (1995) Nature 378, 623-627[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Edelmann, L., Hanson, P. I., Chapman, E. R., and Jahn, R. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 224-231[Abstract]
  28. Cyr, D. M., Langer, T., and Douglas, M. G. (1994) Trends Biochem. Sci. 19, 176-181[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Sheng, Z-H., Rettig, J., Cook, T., and Catterall, W. A. (1996) Nature 379, 451-454[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Mochida, S., Sheng, Z.-H., Baker, C., Kobayashi, H., and Catterall, W. A. (1996) Neuron 17, 781-788[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Rettig, J., Heinemann, C., Ashery, U., Sheng, Z.-H., Yokoyama, C. T., Catterall, W. A., and Neher, E. (1997) J. Neurosci. 17, 6647-6656[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Bohen, S. P., Kralli, A., and Yamamoto, K. R. (1995) Science 268, 1303-1304[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Georgopoulos, C. (1992) Trends Biochem. Sci. 17, 295-299[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Ungewickell, E., Ungewickell, H., Holstein, S. E. H., Lindner, R., Prasad, K., Barouch, W., Martin, B., Greene, L. E., and Eisenberg, E. (1995) Nature 378, 632-635[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.