The LCB4 (YOR171c) and LCB5 (YLR260w) Genes of Saccharomyces Encode Sphingoid Long Chain Base Kinases*

M. Marek Nagiec, Marek Skrzypek, Elizbieta E. Nagiec, Robert L. Lester, and Robert C. DicksonDagger

From the Department of Biochemistry and the Lucille P. Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky 40536-0084

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Sphingolipid long chain bases (LCBs) and phosphorylated derivatives, particularly sphingosine 1-phosphate, are putative signaling molecules. To help elucidate the physiological roles of LCB phosphates, we identified two Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes, LCB4 (YOR171c) and LCB5 (YLR260w), which encode LCB kinase activity. This conclusion is based upon the synthesis of LCB kinase activity in Escherichia coli expressing either LCB gene. LCB4 encodes most (97%) Saccharomyces LCB kinase activity, with the remainder requiring LCB5. Log phase lcb4-deleted yeast cells make no LCB phosphates, showing that the Lcb4 kinase synthesizes all detectable LCB phosphates under these growth conditions. The Lcb4 and Lcb5 proteins are paralogs with 53% amino acid identity but are not related to any known protein, thus revealing a new class of lipid kinase. Two-thirds of the Lcb4 and one-third of the Lcb5 kinase activity are in the membrane fraction of yeast cells, a puzzling finding in that neither protein contains a membrane-localization signal. Both enzymes can use phytosphingosine, dihydrosphingosine, or sphingosine as substrate. LCB4 and LCB5 should be useful for probing the functions of LCB phosphates in S. cerevisiae. Potential mammalian cDNA homologs of the LCB kinase genes may prove useful in helping to understand the function of sphingosine 1-phosphate in mammals.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The sphingolipid metabolite sphingosine and its phosphorylated derivative, sphingosine 1-phosphate (SPP),1 are thought to be signaling molecules for regulating a variety of mammalian cellular processes including cell growth, motility, and death (for review, see Refs.1-3). Recently, SPP and sphingosylphosphorylcholine have been found to bind G protein-coupled receptors (for review, see Ref. 3) that may play roles in platelet activation (4), regulating heart rate (5), the oxidative burst (6), neurite retraction (7), suppression of ceramide-induced apoptosis (7, 8), and morphogenetic differentiation of endothelial cells (9). The finding of both intracellular and extracellular SPP receptors is a strong indication that SPP modulates physiological processes.

Most studies of SPP published to date have used cultured mammalian cells. Whole animal as well as tissue culture studies would benefit from the availability of a cDNA encoding sphingosine kinase which could be used to verify the physiological significance of SPP signaling and to determine how the level of SPP is regulated. No such cDNA is available, nor has any such gene been identified. Here we present evidence for the identification of two Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes encoding kinases, referred to as LCB (long chain base) kinases, because they phosphorylate several LCBs including sphingosine. These two genes should expedite future studies of the functions of LCB phosphates in Saccharomyces and in multicellular eukaryotes.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Strains, Plasmids, and Media-- Strains used in these studies are listed in Table I. Strain MSS200 was made from strain JK9-3da by integrating the TPS2-LacZ reporter plasmid pTPS2-1 into the ura3 locus as described previously (10). Strain MSS206 is a derivative of MSS200 made by deleting DPL1 with the Delta 1 allele followed by insertion of TRP1 into LEU2 by a marker swapping technique (11). The dpl1-Delta 1 allele has the region between the NheI and BglI restriction sites, codons 10-536, replaced by LEU2. Strain RCD158 is a derivative of JK9-3d MATalpha carrying lcb4-Delta 1, a deletion allele with codons 1-560 replaced by a kanamycin resistance cassette. Strain RCD164 is a derivative of JK9-3d MATa carrying lcb5-Delta 1, which has codons 3-683 replaced with a kanamycin resistance cassette. The kanamycin deletion alleles were generated by using the PCR, pUG6 (12) as a template, and a primer with 45 bases homologous to the sequence upstream or downstream of the deleted codons. Cells transformed with the deletion alleles were selected for G418 resistance (13). The expected deletion event was verified by PCR analysis of chromosomal DNA. RCD165 carries both lcb4-Delta 1 and lcb5-Delta 2 and was obtained as a meiotic segregant of diploid strain RCD167. RCD167 was made by crossing RCD165 carrying pRS315 (LEU2, 14) with RCD158, which had TPS2-LacZ reporter plasmid integrated into the ura3 chromosomal locus to give Ura+ cells.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Genotypes and origin of strains used in these studies

Strain MSS206 (Delta dpl1) was mutagenized by transformation with a LEU2-tagged, transposon-mutagenized library of yeast genes essentially as described (15, 16). Transposon-tagged chromosomal genes were retrieved by digesting pRSQ2 (URA3) with BamHI followed by transformation into yeast and selection for Ura+ cells. Yeast chromosomal DNA was isolated, digested with EcoRI, self-ligated using T4 DNA ligase, and transformed into Escherichia coli strain DH5alpha .

The LCB4 and LCB5 coding regions were expressed in E. coli under control of the Trc promoter. The LCB4 coding region was amplified by using the PCR and the upstream primer 5'-CGAGGATCCGATGGTGGTGCAGAAAAAAC-3' and the downstream primer 5'-CAGGAAGCTTCTACATGGATTCAAACTCTG-3' (the underlined bases are in LCB4). The PCR product was cleaved with BamHI and HindIII and ligated to pTrcHisB (Invitrogen) cleaved with the same two enzymes. The protein produced by this construct should have two extra amino acids (DP) at its amino terminus after cleavage with enterokinase. The LCB5 coding region was amplified in a similar manner by using the upstream primer 5'-GCAGCTCGAGTATGACTTTGAAACCTTC-3' and the downstream primer 5'-CAGGAAGCTTCTACATAGAATCGAAATC-3' (the underlined bases are in LCB5). The PCR product was cleaved with XhoI and HindIII and ligated to pTrcHisB cleaved with the same two enzymes. The protein produced by this construct should have five extra amino acids (DPSSS) at its amino terminus after cleavage with enterokinase. Plasmids were transformed into E. coli strain DH5alpha , gene expression was induced by the addition of 1 mM isopropyl beta -D-thiogalactopyranoside to the culture medium, and after 5 h growth at 30 °C, the cells were disrupted by five cycles of freezing and thawing as described in the Invitrogen manual. Disrupted cells were centrifuged for 5 min in a microcentrifuge, and the supernatant fluid was assayed for LCB kinase activity.

The composition of PYED (17) and defined media (18) used for growing yeast cells has been described. E. coli was grown in LB broth. Sphingosine (D-erythro-sphingosine, Matreya, Pleasant Gap, PA) was added to media in the presence of 0.05% tergitol (Nonidet P-40).

Preparation of Yeast Extracts-- Yeast extracts were prepared by vortexing (6 × 30 s in a 15-ml Corex tube) 50-75 A600 units of yeast cells in 1 ml of the extraction buffer (50 mM Hepes, pH 7.5; 5 mM dithiothreitol; 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; and 1 µg/ml each of leupeptin, pepstatin, and aprotinin) with 0.5 ml of 0.5-mm-diameter acid-washed glass beads. All steps were done at 4 °C. The lysate was centrifuged for 5 min at 1,000 × g in a Sorvall SS-34 rotor. The resulting supernatant fluid was centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 15 min in a TLA 100.3 rotor (Beckman). The final supernatant fluid was frozen and stored at -20 °C. The final pellet was washed twice with extraction buffer, resuspended in 400 µl of buffer containing 20% glycerol, and frozen at -20 °C.

Assay of LCB Kinase Activity-- The LCB kinase assay was based on the method of Crowther and Lynch (19). Reactions contained 7 µM DL-erythro-[4,5-3H]DHS ((20), 30 cpm/pmol, 20,000 cpm total), 0.5 mM Triton X-100, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM ATP, 100 mM Tricine, pH 8.1, and 1-50 µg of yeast proteins in a final volume of 100 µl. The reaction mixture was prepared by drying DHS under a stream of nitrogen, adding Triton X-100, and vortexing, followed by the addition of the other components. Enzyme was added to initiate the reaction; after incubation at 30 °C for 30 min, the product was separated from the substrate by differential solvent extraction (19). The amount of product formed was determined by liquid scintillation counting in Ultima Gold LSC-mixture (Packard). The Bradford reagent (Bio-Rad Laboratories) was used to measure protein concentrations with bovine serum albumin as a standard.

Miscellaneous Procedures-- DL-erythro-Dihydrosphingosine, C2-ceramide (N-acetylsphingosine), L-threo-DHS, and D-erythro-sphingosine were purchased from Matreya. LCB phosphates were measured as 32P-labeled compounds by growing cells overnight in PYED medium containing 32Pi and lacking exogenous potassium phosphate.2

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Optimization of Assay Conditions for S. cerevisiae LCB Kinase Activity-- The assay conditions for LCB kinase activity have not been studied systematically in S. cerevisiae cells. We felt it was necessary to optimize the assay conditions as much as possible using cell extracts before isolation of mutants lacking enzyme activity. The components necessary for LCB kinase enzyme activity were determined using [3H]DHS as the LCB substrate. We verified that this substrate was converted to [3H]DHS-1-P by comparison of its mobility on a TLC plate with an authentic standard (data not shown).

As expected from previous studies of sphingosine kinase from mammals and other organisms (19, 21), the S. cerevisiae LCB kinase requires ATP and a detergent, Triton X-100, for activity (Fig. 1A). In the absence of detergent only about 10% of the [3H]DHS was solubilized in the reaction mixture. Complete Mg2+ dependence is evident from the partial loss of enzyme activity in the absence of exogenous Mg2+ and the complete inhibition of enzyme activity by EDTA in the absence of exogenous Mg2+. The reaction was not stimulated by 10 mM Ca2+ (data not shown). The reaction is linear with time for at least 60 min and with a protein concentration up to about 25 µg (data not shown).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Assay conditions for total S. cerevisiae LCB kinase activity. LCB kinase activity in the 100,000 × g soluble fraction of an extract made from JK9-3da cells was assayed using 7 µM [3H]DHS as the substrate. Data are the means ± S.D. of two assays.

The reaction is linear with DHS concentrations up to about 5 µM; higher concentrations start to inhibit, and at 50 µM the reaction only goes to about 70% of the maximum value found at 5 µM (data not shown). The apparent Km for DHS under our reactions conditions is 7.7 ± 0.6 µM (Fig. 2A). The apparent Km for ATP is 25 ± 3.2 µM (Fig. 2B). As discussed below, the Lcb4 kinase represents 97% of the activity in wild type cells; thus, these Km values are for the Lcb4 kinase. Deletion of LCB4 allowed us to assay the Lcb5 kinase activity, and it gave an apparent Km for DHS under these reactions conditions of 2 ± 1 µM (data not shown).


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   LCB kinase activity as a function of substrate concentration. Panel A, DHS-1-P production was measured as a function of the DHS concentration and is presented as a double reciprocal plot yielding an apparent Km of 7.7 ± 0.6 µM for DHS. Panel B, DHS-1-P production was measured as a function of the ATP concentration and is presented as a double reciprocal plot yielding an apparent Km of 25 ± 3.2 µM for ATP.

Isolation of a Mutant Strain Lacking LCB Kinase Activity-- Our rationale for identifying a gene encoding LCB kinase activity was based upon the observation that cells deleted for the DPL1 gene are more sensitive to growth inhibition by treatment with sphingosine than are parental cells (22). DPL1 is necessary for the breakdown of SPP to phosphoethanolamine and hexadecenal and is thought to encode the SPP lyase activity present in S. cerevisiae cells (22). It seemed likely that sensitivity to sphingosine was caused by the accumulation of SPP and that inactivation of LCB kinase activity by mutation of the cognate gene would reverse the sphingosine-sensitive phenotype of the dpl1 deletion strain and allow cells to grow in the presence of an inhibitory concentration of sphingosine.

To be able to identify the mutated LCB kinase gene, MSS206 (relevant genotype is dpl1-Delta 1) cells were transformed with a library of genes disrupted by insertion of a LEU2-tagged transposon (15). Leu+ transformants were pooled and replated on defined medium lacking leucine and uracil and containing 10 µM sphingosine. About 1/5,000 transformants grew, which was about the frequency expected for mutation of a single LCB kinase gene. However, MSS206 cells transformed with a control plasmid (pRS315, 14) gave resistant cells at a frequency of 1/8,000. We do not know why the control cells give such a high frequency of sphingosine-resistant cells, but this result indicated that not every MSS206 cell that lacked LCB kinase activity would be due to insertion of the LEU2-tagged transposon into the kinase gene.

To identify cells in which the kinase- phenotype was caused by the insertion of the LEU2-tagged transposon into the kinase gene, we first assayed cells for LCB kinase activity and then verified by Southern blot analysis that there was only a single transposon per strain (15). 15 strains meeting these criteria were then analyzed in more detail by Southern blotting using chromosomal DNA cleaved either with EcoRI or ClaI. These enzymes cleave the tagged transposon once and should yield two DNA fragments that hybridize to a radiolabeled transposon DNA probe. The rationale for this approach was to look for a correlation between the lack of LCB kinase activity and the size of the two restriction fragments because the size would depend upon the chromosomal location of the transposon.

Four LCB kinase- strains were found to give the same restriction fragments, suggesting that the transposon had disrupted the same kinase gene. The chromosomal locus containing the transposon was retrieved from two of the strains by using a rescue plasmid. DNA sequence analysis of the retrieved DNA indicated that the LEU2-tagged transposon had integrated in both strains into open reading frame YOR171c, renamed LCB4 (Fig. 3).


View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   The Lcb4 and Lcb5 proteins are homologs. The predicted S. cerevisiae Lcb4p, Lcb5p, and the putative S. pombe homolog (PID, 2370540, GenBank accession no. Z98762) were aligned using the CLUSTAL algorithm (32) with identical amino acids indicated by an asterisk (*) and chemically similar amino acids by a dot (·). Gaps inserted into the sequences are indicated by a dashed line (- - -).

A search of predicted S. cerevisiae proteins using the BLAST algorithm (23) identified the protein encoded by open reading frame YLR260w, renamed LCB5, as a homolog of the Lcb4 protein. The Lcb4 and Lcb5 proteins have 53% amino acid identity and 12% similarity, but most of these residues are concentrated in two regions within the carboxyl two-thirds of the proteins, residues 213-439 and 479-624 of Lcb4p (Fig. 3). The two proteins appear to be related to a Schizosaccharomyces pombe protein of unknown function (Fig. 3).

The LCB4 Gene Encodes Most of the LCB Kinase Activity-- To verify that LCB4 was necessary for LCB kinase activity, we deleted the gene in strain JK9-3dalpha to give strain RCD158. RCD158 cells have only 2-3% of the LCB kinase activity found in parental JK9-3dalpha cells (Table II), demonstrating that Lcb4p constitutes 97-98% of the LCB kinase activity in wild type cells. The distribution of the Lcb4 protein was examined by using RCD164 (Delta lcb5) cells. About one-third of the Lcb4 kinase activity is in the soluble fraction after two washes of the 100,000 × g pellet, and the remainder is in the pellet fraction. This distribution is reversed in strain RCD158 (Delta lcb4), indicating that the Lcb5 protein has a different distribution of enzyme activity (Table II). Because there is no detectable LCB kinase activity in the lcb4 lcb5 double deletion strain RCD165, we conclude that these two genes encode all LCB kinase activity in JK9-3d cells, at least under our assay conditions.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
LCB kinase activity in wild type and mutant strains
The amount and distribution of LCB kinase activity in parental JK9-3dalpha (wild type) cells and in cells deleted for lcb4 (RCD158), for lcb5 (RCD164), or for both genes (RCD165) were measured by using 6.8 µM [3H]DHS as the substrate. Data are the means ± S.D. for three assays. Enzyme units are defined as the amount of enzyme needed to synthesize 1 pmol of DHS-1-P/min.

LCB4 and Its Homolog LCB5 Encode LCB Kinase Activity-- Because the predicted Lcb4 and Lcb5 proteins do not show similarity to known proteins it was not clear whether they catalyzed phosphorylation of LCBs or regulated LCB kinase activity. To distinguish between these possibilities each gene was expressed in E. coli as a fusion protein with a His6-Xpress epitope-enterokinase cleavage sequence added to their amino terminus. The soluble protein fraction made from bacterial cells carrying either the LCB4 or the LCB5 fusion gene had LCB kinase activity as shown by the protein- and time-dependent formation of DHS-1P (Fig. 4). Control extracts made from cells carrying the vector had no detectable LCB kinase activity (Fig. 4). We conclude from these experiments that LCB4 and LCB5 encode LCB kinase activity.


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Expression of LCB4 and LCB5 in E. coli yields LCB kinase activity. The soluble fraction of an extract prepared from E. coli transformed with a plasmid expressing a His6-tagged version of LCB4 (filled circles, top panels) or LCB5 (filled circles, bottom panels), or transformed with a control plasmid (pTrcHisB, open circles) was assayed for LCB kinase activity by measuring the production of [3H]DHS-1-P. The concentration of [3H]DHS was 7 µM. The reactions for LCB4 and LCB5 contained 12 and 9 µg of protein, respectively.

RCD158 (Delta lcb4) Cells Contain No Detectable LCB Phosphates-- To determine which of the LCB genes is responsible for synthesis of LCB phosphates we quantified the amount of these compounds in mutant and parental cells. Cells were grown overnight in the presence of 32Pi at 25 °C to early log phase (A600 nm = 0.3) and then shifted to 37 °C for 10 min. Lipids were extracted as described previously (17), deacylated, and enriched for LCB phosphates by chromatography on an AG4 column.2 The fractions containing partially purified LCB phosphates were analyzed by thin layer chromatography. Parental JK9-3da cells (Fig. 5, lane labeled WT) make both DHS-1-P and PHS-1-P under these experimental conditions. The Delta lcb4 (RCD158) and Delta lcb4 Delta lcb5 (RCD165) cells contain what appears to be a very small amount of radiolabeled compounds that migrate like the two LCB phosphates. However, when each sample was chromatographed in a second dimension, the two radioactive spots did not migrate like either PHS-1-P or DHS-1-P (data not shown). Thus, neither strain makes any detectable LCB phosphates. The Delta lcb5 (RCD164) cells contain a normal level of PHS-1-P and DHS-1-P compared with the wild type JK9-3da cells (Fig. 5). We conclude from these data that the Lcb4 kinase is responsible for synthesis of LCB phosphates under the conditions of these experiments; the Lcb5 kinase is unable to make any detectable LCB phosphates under these experimental conditions.


View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   LCB phosphates are not present in mutant cells. The concentration and type of LCB phosphates in JK9-3d parental (WT), Delta lcb4 (RCD158), Delta lcb5 (RCD164), and Delta lcb4 Delta lcb5 (RCD165) cells was determined after long term growth in medium containing 32Pi. Samples were chromatographed on a TLC plate (K5 Silica Gel 100A, Whatman) in chloroform:methanol:water (60:35:8), and radioactivity was quantified by PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics) analysis. Radiolabeled DHS-1-P and PHS-1-P standards are shown. The origin is at the bottom of the figure.

Substrate Specificity of the Lcb4 and Lcb5 Kinases-- To begin to understand the function of each LCB kinase, we examined their substrate specificity because they might have different preferred substrates. In these experiments the concentration of substrate, [3H]DHS, was kept constant at about one-half its Km value, and the concentration of the nonradioactive competitor was added at a similar concentration (see Table III). If the competitor was a substrate of equal Km, then the reaction should be inhibited by 50%.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III
Substrate specificity of LCB kinases
Lcb4 and Lcb5 kinase activity was assayed using the soluble fraction prepared from RCD164 cells (deleted for lcb5) and RCD158 cells (deleted for lcb4). The concentration of [3H]DHS was 3.6 µM for the Lcb4 assays and 3.3 µM for the Lcb5 assays. The specific activity of the Lcb4 and Lcb5 kinases in the absence of inhititor was 197 and 2.9, respectively. The competitors were all used at 3 µM. Data are the means ± S.D. for three assays. Specific enzyme activity is defined as the amount of enzyme needed to synthesize 1 pmol of DHS-1-P/min/mg of protein.

PHS, a normal LCB intermediate in yeast cells (24), reduced the activity of both enzymes slightly (Table III), indicating that PHS is a substrate with a Km somewhat higher than DHS. Sphingosine, the LCB found in mammals but not reported in yeast cells (24), reduced enzyme activity slightly more than PHS did. Separate experiments (data not shown) indicate that extracts of JK9-3da cells make DHS-1-P, PHS-1-P, and SPP from [delta -32P]ATP and the LCBs. The nonbiological threo isomer of DHS was only slightly inhibitory, indicating that it is a poorer substrate for the enzyme. C2-ceramide (N-acetylsphingosine), a compound lacking a free amino group, most likely necessary for a good enzyme substrate, showed no inhibitory activity toward either enzyme. Finally, the extracts used for these experiments (Table III) were frozen and thawed several times and exhibit lower specific activities for both kinases than are observed with fresh extracts (Table II). We conclude from the data presented in Table III that the Lcb4 and Lcb5 kinases have similar substrate specificities, at least under these assay conditions. More precise comparisons of substrate specificities must await purification of each enzyme.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Our data demonstrate that the LCB4 and LCB5 genes of S. cerevisiae encode LCB kinase activity, the first time that genes encoding this type of enzyme have been identified in any organism. This conclusion is based upon the complete lack of LCB kinase enzyme activity in an lcb4 lcb5 double deletion strain (Table II), upon the production of LCB kinase activity in E. coli cells expressing either LCB4 or LCB5 but not in cells carrying only the vector (Fig. 4), and finally, the demonstration that a lcb4 deletion mutant does not make any detectable DHS-1-P or PHS-1-P in vivo under conditions where the parental strain makes both compounds (Fig. 5).

Identification of the LCB4 gene was based upon the observation that a strain lacking the DPL1 gene, believed to encode LCB phosphate lyase activity, is more sensitive to and is growth-inhibited by lower concentrations of sphingosine than is the parental strain (22). In the presence of sphingosine the mutant cells accumulate SPP (22) which is believed to inhibit growth, although the mechanism is unclear (25). Our data support the idea that SPP is growth-inhibiting since mutation of lcb4 resulted in both the loss of more than 95% of cellular LCB kinase activity, and it allowed growth in the presence of an inhibitory concentration of sphingosine. Because SPP appears to inhibit growth it may be that under some physiological circumstances DHS-1-P, PHS-1-P, or both are used by yeast cells to modulate growth.

The predicted Lcb4 and Lcb5 proteins are paralogs that show no similarity to known proteins. They thus represent a new class of lipid kinase. They appear to be related to proteins with unknown functions including one from S. pombe (Fig. 3) and ones encoded by mouse and human expressed sequence tags (e.g. GenBank AA107451, D31133, R74736, and N55929). The two most conserved portions of the LCB kinases are in the middle and the COOH terminus of the proteins (Fig. 4). The functions of these regions and the less conserved NH2 terminus remain to be determined.

S. cerevisiae cells contain a high level of LCB kinase activity in the 100,000 × g pellet fraction based upon a specific activity of 4,500 pmol/mg/min (Table II). This value is more than four times the value of 1,080 pmol/mg/min for LCB kinase activity in corn shoot microsomes (19) and 100 times greater than the value of 40 pmol/mg/min from bovine brain (26). About two-thirds of the Lcb4 and one-third of the Lcb5 enzyme activity are found in the pellet fraction of the cell (Table II). It remains to be determined if the proteins are retained within the lumen of an organelle or if they are bound to a membrane. Neither protein has a predicted transmembrane spanning domain nor an attachment site for a lipid anchor, so if the proteins are binding to a membrane, they must do so through protein-protein interaction or through a novel lipid anchor motif. In platelets, sphingosine kinase is primarily a soluble enzyme, whereas in rat brain and other tissues it is peripherally associated with membranes (21). About 80% of the activity in rat pheochromocytoma PC12 neuronal cells is soluble and the other 20% is in the particulate fraction (27), where it is presumed to be membrane-bound. It should now be possible to determine the mechanism and the circumstances under which Lcb4 and Lcb5 enzyme activity distribute between the membrane and soluble fractions. This information may help to elucidate why sphingosine kinase activity is in a similar fraction in mammalian cells. Other lipid kinases have been shown to bind to membranes in a regulated manner (28), and it will be important to determine if LCB kinases show similar behavior.

Most of the LCB kinase activity in JK9-3a cells is encoded by LCB4 (Delta lcb5, strain RCD164, Table II), and this kinase synthesizes all of the DHS-1-P and PHS-1-P present in log phase cells grown in rich medium because neither of these compounds was found in cells making only the Lcb5 kinase (Delta lcb4, strain RCD158, Fig. 5). Our data do not eliminate the possibility that LCB phosphates made by the Lcb5 kinase are very short lived and present at a very low concentration. The function of the Lcb5 kinase may be very specialized and depend upon its cellular location. Alternatively, the LCB5 gene may just be a remnant of the genome duplication event that occurred in S. cerevisiae (29). This possibility seems unlikely, however, because a nonessential gene would be expected to become mutated and no longer encode an active enzyme. Mice and humans also seem to have more than one species of LCB kinase based upon our analysis of homologs predicted to be encoded by expressed sequence tags. Retention of multiple species of LCB kinases over a long evolutionary time span suggests that they perform specialized functions.

All eukaryotes examined to date have LCB kinase activity, indicating that this enzyme provides survival value to cells. Besides its presumed role in generating signaling molecules, it is essential for catabolizing LCBs to yield phosphoethanolamine, which serves as a precursor for synthesis of phosphatidylethanolamine and phosphatidylcholine. The physiological importance of this metabolic conduit from sphingolipid to glycerophospholipid metabolism has not been determined. The LCB4 and LCB5 genes make it possible to examine the role of this metabolic pathway in S. cerevisiae cells. Cells lacking both genes grow normally in rich and synthetic medium (data not shown), indicating that LCB phosphates and flux through this metabolic pathway are not necessary for a normal rate of growth with glucose as the carbon source, at least not under short term laboratory conditions. Other phenotypes await analysis as does the role of LCB phosphates as second messengers during stress responses (30).

If the putative human and mouse expressed sequence tags do indeed encode homologs of the yeast LCB kinases, it should be possible to use them to manipulate the level of SPP in mammals and thereby establish the physiological functions of SPP.

    Addendum

After submission of this manuscript for publication, Olivera et al. (31) reported the purification and enzymatic characterization of sphingosine kinase from rat kidney.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM41302 (to R. L. L. and R. C. D.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry, University of Kentucky Medical Center, 800 Rose St., Lexington, KY 40536-0084. Tel.: 606-323-6052; Fax: 606-257-8940; E-mail: bobd{at}pop.uky.edu.

1 The abbreviations used are: SPP, sphingosine 1-phosphate; LCB, long chain base; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; DHS, dihydrosphingosine; DHS-1-P, dihydrosphingosine 1-phosphate; PHS, phytosphingosine; PHS-1-P, phytosphingosine 1-phosphate.

2 M. Skrzypek, M. M. Nagiec, R. L. Lester, and R. C. Dickson, submitted for publication.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Spiegel, S., and Merrill, A. H., Jr. (1996) FASEB J. 10, 1388-1397[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Spiegel, S., Foster, D., and Kolesnick, R. N. (1996) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8, 159-167[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. zu Heringdorf, D. M., van Koppen, C. J., and Jakobs, K. H. (1997) FEBS Lett. 410, 34-38[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Yatomi, Y., Ruan, F., Hakomori, S., and Igarashi, Y. (1995) Blood 86, 193-202[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Bunemann, M., Liliom, K., Brandts, B. K., Pott, L., Tseng, J. L., Desiderio, D. M., Sun, G. P., Miller, D., and Tigyi, G. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 5527-5534[Abstract]
  6. Choi, O. H., Kim, J. H., and Kinet, J. P. (1996) Nature 380, 634-636[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Postma, F. R., Jalink, K., Hengeveld, T., and Moolenaar, W. H. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 2388-2392[Abstract]
  8. Cuvillier, O., Pirianov, G., Kleuser, B., Vanek, P. G., Coso, O. A., Gutkind, J. S., and Spiegel, S. (1996) Nature 381, 800-803[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Lee, M. J., Van Brocklyn, J. R., Thangada, S., Liu, C. H., Hand, A. R., Menzeleev, R., Spiegel, A., and Hla, T. (1998) Science 279, 1552-1555[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Dickson, R. C., Nagiec, E. E., Skrzypek, M., Tillman, P., Wells, G. B., and Lester, R. L. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 30196-30200[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Cross, F. R. (1997) Yeast 13, 647-653[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Guldener, U., Heck, S., Fiedler, T., Beinhauer, J., and Hegemann, J. H. (1996) Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 2519-2524[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Wach, A. (1996) Yeast 12, 259-265[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Sikorski, R. S., and Hieter, P. (1989) Genetics 122, 19-27[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Burns, N., Grimwade, B., Ross-Macdonald, P. B., Choi, E.-Y., Finberg, K., Roeder, G. S., and Snyder, M. (1994) Genes Dev. 8, 1087-1105[Abstract]
  16. Burns, N., Ross-MacDonald, P., Roeder, G. S., and Snyder, M. (1998) in Microbial Genome Methods (Adolph, K. W., ed), pp. 61-79, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
  17. Nagiec, M. M., Nagiec, E. E., Baltisberger, J. A., Wells, G. B., Lester, R. L., and Dickson, R. C. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 9809-9817[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Buede, R., Rinker-Schaffer, C., Pinto, W. J., Lester, R. L., and Dickson, R. C. (1991) J. Bacteriol. 173, 4325-4332[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Crowther, G. J., and Lynch, D. V. (1997) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 337, 284-290[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Wells, G. B., Dickson, R. C., and Lester, R. L. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 7235-7243[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Buehrer, B. M., and Bell, R. M. (1993) Adv. Lipid Res. 26, 59-67[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Saba, D. J., Nara, F., Bielawska, A., Garrett, S., and Hannun, Y. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 26087-26090[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., and Lipman, D. J. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Lester, R. L., and Dickson, R. C. (1993) Adv. Lipid. Res. 26, 253-272[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Skrzypek, M., Lester, R. L., and Dickson, R. C. (1997) J. Bacteriol. 179, 1513-1520[Abstract]
  26. Louie, D. D., Kisic, A., and Schroefer, G. J., Jr. (1976) J. Biol. Chem. 251, 4557-4564[Abstract]
  27. Rius, R. A., Edsall, L. C., and Spiegel, S. (1997) FEBS Lett. 417, 173-176[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Pawson, T., and Scott, J. D. (1997) Science 278, 2075-2080[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Wolfe, H. W., and Shields, D. C. (1997) Nature 387, 708-713[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Patton, J. L., Srinivasan, B., Dickson, R. C., and Lester, R. L. (1992) J. Bacteriol. 174, 7180-7184[Abstract]
  31. Olivera, A., Kohama, T., Tu, Z., Milstien, S., and Spiegel, S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 12576-12583[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Higgins, D. G., and Sharp, P. M. (1989) Comput. Appl. Biosci. 5, 151-153[Abstract]
  33. Heitman, J., Movva, N. R., Hiestand, P. C., and Hall, M. N. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 1948-1952[Abstract]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.