Expression of the Platelet-activating Factor Receptor Results in Enhanced Ultraviolet B Radiation-induced Apoptosis in a Human Epidermal Cell Line*

Lisa A. BarberDagger §, Dan F. SpandauDagger parallel , Sara C. RathmanDagger **, Robert C. MurphyDagger Dagger , Christopher A. JohnsonDagger Dagger , Susan W. KelleyDagger §, Steven A. HurwitzDagger , and Jeffrey B. TraversDagger §**§§

From the Departments of Dagger  Dermatology, § Pediatrics, ** Pharmacology and Toxicology, and parallel  Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and the  H. B Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202 and the Dagger Dagger  Department of Pediatrics, National Jewish Medical and Research Center, Denver, Colorado 80206

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Recent studies have demonstrated that ultraviolet B radiation (UVB) damages human keratinocytes in part by inducing oxidative stress and cytokine production. Severe UVB damage to the keratinocyte can also result in apoptosis or programmed cell death. Although the lipid mediator platelet-activating factor (PAF) is synthesized in response to epidermal cell damage and epidermal cells express PAF receptors, it is not known whether PAF is involved in UVB-induced epidermal cell apoptosis. These studies examined the role of the PAF system in UVB-induced epidermal cell apoptosis using a novel model system created by retroviral-mediated transduction of the PAF receptor-negative human epidermal cell line KB with the human PAF receptor (PAF-R). Expression of the PAF-R in KB cells did not affect base-line growth or apoptosis, yet resulted in a decrease in the lag time between treatment of the cells and the induction of apoptosis following irradiation with 400 J/m2 UVB. This effect was inhibited by pretreatment with the PAF-R antagonists WEB 2086 and A-85783, confirming involvement of the PAF-R in this process. At lower doses (100-200 J/m2) of UVB, only KB cells that expressed the PAF-R became apoptotic. Treatment of PAF-R-expressing KB clones with the metabolically stable PAF-R agonist 1-hexadexyl-2-N-methylcarbamoyl-3-glycerophosphocholine (CPAF) alone did not induce apoptosis but augmented the degree of apoptosis observed if CPAF was used in combination with lower doses (200 J/m2) of UVB irradiation. Interestingly, UVB irradiation was found to stimulate PAF synthesis only in PAF-R-expressing KB cell clones. The antioxidants N-acetyl cysteine, 1,1,3,3-tetramethyl-2-thiourea, and vitamin E inhibited both UVB-induced PAF biosynthesis as well as the augmentation of UVB-induced apoptosis in PAF-R-expressing KB clones, suggesting the possibility that UVB stimulates the production of oxidized lipid species with PAF-R agonistic activity in this model system. Thus, these studies indicate that a component of UVB-induced epidermal cell cytotoxicity can be modulated by PAF-R activation through the production of PAF and PAF-like species.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Through the synthesis and release of soluble proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors, keratinocytes play an active role in cutaneous inflammation. Among these inflammatory and trophic compounds that can play a role in cutaneous inflammation/keratinocyte function is platelet-activating factor (1-alkyl-2-acetyl-glycero-3-phosphocholine; PAF) (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2).1 Derived from glycerophosphocholines, PAF is a potent activator of many cell types including platelets, monocytes, polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs), mast cells, and vascular endothelium. PAF also has trophic effects on diverse cell types (3, 4). Although PAF can be metabolized to potentially biologically active neutral lipid or phosphatidic acid species (5-7), the majority of PAF effects are thought to be mediated through a G protein-linked transmembrane receptor (PAF-R) (reviewed in Ref. 8). Consistent with the myriad of responses linked to PAF, activation of the PAF-R stimulates many signal transduction systems, including phospholipases C, A2, and D and mitogen-activated protein kinase. PAF is the best characterized ligand for the PAF-R; yet other natural products can utilize this receptor including oxidized phospholipids derived from low density lipoproteins (9, 10), lipopolysaccharide and protein A (11), lipotechoic acid moieties on Streptococcus species (12), and 1-acyl 2-acetyl GPCs (13, 14). The diversity of ligands recognized by the PAF-R could potentially allow involvement of this system in numerous pathological conditions including oxidative damage and bacterial infection.

Recent evidence suggests that PAF and the PAF-R could be involved in keratinocyte biology. Keratinocytes express functional PAF-Rs (15) and synthesize PAF and 1-acyl PAF analogs in response to numerous stimuli including ionophores, growth factors, and ultraviolet radiation (16, 17). PAF is not found in normal skin but has been detected in inflammatory skin diseases including psoriasis (18) and urticaria (19).

Within the epidermis, keratinocytes are chronically exposed to a powerful oxidant and DNA-damaging agent, UV light. Acute short term UVB (280-320 nm) absorption by keratinocytes results in oxidative stress and DNA damage (20). If the damage is moderate, it can be repaired (21). However, if the damage is extensive, DNA repair processes do not occur, and the keratinocytes undergo programmed cell death or apoptosis (22).

Apoptotic cells have distinct morphological characteristics; in fact, apoptosis was first recognized in cells based on the unusual morphological features of the process (23, 24). In the epidermis, apoptosis prevents keratinocytes that have extensive UVB-induced DNA damage from undergoing cell division and passing genetic mutations that might have gone unrepaired to any of their progeny cells, substantially lowering the risk of developing cancer. Disregulation of the apoptotic mechanism in skin can lead to erythema multiforme, lichen planus, papillomas, and skin cancer. Several features of apoptosis can be used to help define this process. For example, the condensed chromatin found in apoptotic cells can be identified by staining cells with the fluorochrome 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). The induction of apoptosis also activates a very specific proteolytic cascade. The proteases activated are collectively called caspases, and they target important cellular proteins involved in cell proliferation or DNA repair for precise cleavage (25). One of the caspase substrates is the DNA repair enzyme poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase (PARP). Just as important proteins are targeted for organized dismantling, so is the chromatin. The induction of apoptosis leads to the activation of an endonuclease that cleaves genomic DNA between nucleosomes (26). This destruction of the genomic DNA yields the "DNA ladders" that are characteristic of the experimental proof of apoptosis.

It is not presently known whether the PAF system participates in UVB-induced apoptosis. However, several lines of evidence suggest that PAF/PAF-R could be involved in UVB-mediated keratinocyte damage. First, ultraviolet radiation has been reported to be a stimulus for PAF biosynthesis in corneal epithelial cells (17). In addition, cytokines and the oxidative stress generated in response to UVB irradiation in epidermal cells can cause PAF production in other cell types. For example, TNF-alpha treatment stimulates PAF synthesis in monocytes, neutrophils, and endothelial cells (27). Reactive oxygen species have also been reported to induce PAF biosynthesis in endothelial cells and myocytes (28, 29). Second, PAF has been reported to have synergistic effects in combination with known inducers of apoptosis. In immature T cells PAF has been noted to have no effect on apoptosis when administered alone; yet this lipid mediator augmented apoptosis induced by a calcium ionophore (30). Similarly, treatment of eosinophils with PAF has been found to increase FAS-induced apoptosis (31). However, PAF has also been reported to inhibit apoptosis in B cell lines (32), suggesting that modulatory effects of PAF on apoptosis may be cell type- and insult-specific.

The objective of these studies was to assess whether PAF-R activation can modulate UVB-induced apoptosis. Using a model system our laboratory has developed by retroviral-mediated gene transduction to express the human PAF-R in the PAF-R-negative human epidermoid cell line KB (33), we present evidence indicating that the PAF-R can modulate UVB-induced epidermal cell damage.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Reagents-- Routine chemicals, PAF, 1-hexadexyl-2-N-acetyl-3-glycerophosphocholine (CPAF), N-acetyl cysteine, 1,1,3,3-tetramethyl-2-thiourea (TMTU), alpha -tocopherol (vitamin E), DAPI, and fatty acid-free bovine serum albumin were obtained from Sigma. Growth medium and supplements were purchased from Life Technologies, and fetal bovine serum was from Intergen (Purchase, NY). The PAF-R antagonists were kindly provided as follows: WEB-2086 from Boehringer Ingelheim (Ridgefield, CT) and A-85783 from Dr. James Summers (Abbot Pharmaceuticals, Abbott Park, IL).

KB PAF-R Model System-- The epithelial cell line KB (34) was cultured as described previously (15, 16). KB cells were transduced with the MSCV2.1 retrovirus containing the human leukocyte PAF-R cDNA as described previously (33). KB cell clones transduced with PAF-R (KBP) or with control MSCV2.1 retrovirus (KBM) were characterized by Southern and Northern blot analysis and by binding and calcium mobilization studies to demonstrate that the KB PAF-R was functional (33). Four KBP and two KBM control clones were used in these studies. The four KBP clones all had similar amounts of apoptosis in response to 400 J/m2 UVB at 6 h. All experiments were replicated with at least two different KBP or KBM clones.

UVB Irradiation-- Epidermal cells were irradiated as described previously (22). Briefly, KBP or KBM clones were plated on 35-mm dishes 24 h prior to each experiment at 120,000 cells/dish. The cells were rinsed with PBS, and prewarmed (37 °C) medium was added, then UVB-irradiated (FS20 Westinghouse Electric Corp., Pittsburgh, PA), and immediately returned to the 37 °C incubator until processing at various times. In experiments in which CPAF was used, cells were treated with CPAF or ethanol vehicle (0.1%) immediately following irradiation. For experiments involving PAF antagonists or antioxidants, cells were preincubated with drug, ethanol, or Me2SO vehicle (0.5%) for 30 min, and medium was replaced with prewarmed medium before UVB treatment.

DAPI Staining-- At the appropriate time point after irradiation, KB cells that had detached from the culture dish and the remaining attached KB cells were combined and centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 10 min. The cells were then resuspended in 200 ml of PBS and placed into a Shandon (Pittsburgh, PA) cytospin with 50 µl of 22% bovine serum albumin. After centrifugation (5 min at 600 rpm) the cells were fixed with 100 µl of Histochoice fixative (Solon, OH) for 10 min. The cells were then washed three times with PBS, and 100 µl of 5 µM DAPI in PBS was applied. The cells were incubated in the dark for 20 min and washed three times with PBS over a period of 10 min. After coverslips were mounted with Flouromount-G, the cells whose nuclei contained chromatin aggregation and nuclear condensation versus normal-appearing cells were counted in blinded fashion by a second investigator. Data are expressed as the mean percentages of apoptotic cells.

DNA Ladder Analysis-- Low molecular weight DNA was extracted from KB cells after UBV irradiation at the indicated times using the Stratagene DNA extraction kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). 10 µg of total genomic DNA was separated on a 2.0% agarose gel, and the gel was stained with ethidium bromide.

Caspase Activation-- The activation of the caspase proteolytic cascade was measured by assaying for the degradation of a substrate of caspase enzymes, PARP. At the indicated times following UVB irradiation, KB cells were harvested in lysis buffer (62.5 mM Tris/HCl, pH 6.8, 6 M urea, 10% glycerol, 2% SDS, and 5% beta -mercaptoethanol), and protein lysates were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. PARP was identified on immunoblots by incubation with a monoclonal antibody that recognizes the intact (116 kDa) PARP protein as well as the major proteolytic cleavage fragment (85 kDa) of PARP (C-2-10, Pharmingen, San Diego, CA). PARP protein bands were detected by ECL (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Relative amounts of PARP protein were determined by scanning densitometry (ISS-Enprotech, Natick, MA).

Measurement of PAF Species Following UVB Treatment-- 1-Hexadecyl-2-acetyl-GPC (PAF) and 1-palmitoyl-2-acetyl-GPC (PAPC) were measured in KB cells by select ion monitoring gas chromatography mass spectrometry with deuterated internal standards with minor modifications from those previously described (16). Briefly, 10-cm dishes with >90% confluent cells were washed three times with HBSS. 1 ml of prewarmed HBSS containing 0.25% fatty acid-free bovine serum albumin (Sigma) was added to dishes, and the cells were irradiated. Immediately following irradiation, the reaction was quenched with 2 × 2-ml treatments with ice-cold ethanol, and the entire contents of the plates were scraped and placed into tubes containing deuterium-labeled 1-hexadecyl and 1-palmitoyl sn-2 acetyl GPC standards (2 ng each). Cells from similarly treated dishes were trypsinized and counted (Coulter) to derive cell numbers.

Statistics-- Data are presented as the means ± S.D. Statistical significance is assessed by the Student's t test, and significance is set at p < 0.05.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

The KB PAF-R Model System-- Because PAF may have both receptor-dependent and -independent effects (secondary to the formation of biologically active metabolites), a model system was developed to study the role of the PAF-R in epidermal cell function. This system utilizes the human epidermal cell line KB, which, unlike normal human keratinocytes, does not express functional PAF-Rs (15, 16). A PAF-R-positive KB cell line was created by transducing KB cells with the replication-defective MSCV2.1 retrovirus containing the entire human PAF-R cDNA (33). By comparing the effects of UVB on both PAF-R-positive (KBP) and -negative (transduced with empty MSCV 2.1 retrovirus; KBM) KB cells, the role of the PAF-R in UVB-induced apoptosis could be readily assessed.

Cytotoxic Effects of UVB on KB Cells-- In our first studies, KBM and KBP clones were irradiated with 400 J/m2 UVB, and the cells were examined for gross morphological changes 6 h following irradiation. Expression of the PAF-R alone did not affect the morphology of the cells. However, upon exposure to UVB, an increased cytotoxic response was noted in KBP cells in comparison with KBM cells. To assess whether the increased cell death induced by UVB irradiation of KBP cells was because of apoptosis, we examined the cells for the following three hallmarks of apoptosis: nuclear condensation, internucleosomal DNA cleavage, and caspase activation. KBM and KBP cells were irradiated with either 0 or 400 J/m2 UVB, and all of the cells in the culture dish were harvested 6 h later. The cells were then stained with DAPI and examined by fluorescent microscopy. Unirradiated KBM (Fig. 1A) or KBP (Fig. 1C) cells demonstrated primarily round, homogeneously stained nuclei, indicating no degradation of nuclear material. A small percentage of the nuclei from KBM cells irradiated with 400 J/m2 UVB (Fig. 1B) displayed evidence of apoptosis, identified by the smaller, more intensely stained nuclear blebs. In contrast, KBP cells irradiated with 400 J/m2 UVB contained predominately apoptotic nuclei. The induction of apoptosis in these cells was confirmed by extracting genomic DNA from irradiated and unirradiated KBM and KBP cells. Again, KBM and KBP cells were irradiated with 0 or 400 J/m2 UVB, and genomic DNA was extracted at 4 and 8 h post-irradiation. Unirradiated KBM or KBP cells did not exhibit the characteristic DNA ladders found in apoptotic cells (Fig. 2A). KBM cells irradiated with 400 J/m2 and harvested at 8 h post-irradiation demonstrated faint nucleosome-sized DNA fragments. However, KBP cells (two separate clones are shown in Fig. 2B) irradiated with 400 J/m2 UVB displayed extensive DNA ladders 8 h after UVB irradiation. The presence of apoptotic cells was confirmed by a third set of experiments that assayed the activation of the caspase proteolytic cascade. KBM and KBP cells were irradiated as described previously, and the activation of caspase enzymes was monitored by the specific cleavage of the PARP protein. A small percentage of caspase-cleaved PARP protein was detected in KBM cells 8 h following UVB irradiation (Fig. 2B). In KBP cells, all of the detectable PARP protein was cleaved by 8 h after 400 J/m2 of UVB (Fig. 2B). Together, these three distinct assays for apoptosis demonstrate that the presence of the PAF-R increased the sensitivity of KB cells to undergo UVB-induced apoptosis.


View larger version (174K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   DAPI staining of KB cells before and after UVB irradiation. KBM (A and B) or KBP (C and D) cells were untreated (A and C) or irradiated with 400 J/m2 (B and D) and stained with DAPI at 6 h post-treatment.


View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   UVB-induced DNA laddering and PARP cleavage in KBP cells. A, DNA laddering. Total cellular DNA was extracted from a KBM or two KBP clones 0, 4, or 8 h after irradiation with 400 J/m2 UVB. Extracted DNA was separated on a 2% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. B, PARP cleavage. Protein was extracted from a KBM or two KBP clones 0, 4, or 8 h after irradiation with 400 J/m2 UVB and separated by gel electrophoresis. Immunoblotting was performed using an antibody that binds both cleaved and uncleaved PARP, which were detected as two separate bands. Densitometry was performed to determine the amount of PARP cleavage.

Our next studies examined the dose and time dependence of UVB-induced apoptosis in KB cells. Fig. 3A depicts a dose-response curve for UVB-induced apoptosis (as assessed by DAPI staining) in treated KB cells at 6 h. UVB treatment caused a significant increase in apoptosis in KBP cells compared with KBM cells at each dose of UVB radiation tested. The kinetics of UVB-induced apoptosis in KBM versus KBP cells following irradiation with 400 J/m2 was next examined. As shown in Fig. 3B, apoptosis was seen in response to UVB irradiation at earlier time points in KBP cells than in KBM cells. In KBP cells treated with 400 J/m2, 50% apoptosis was achieved at less than 4 h versus 8 h in the KBM cells. By 16 h, there was no difference in the amount of apoptosis between KBP and KBM cells (Fig. 3B). Similarly, the amounts of PARP cleavage and DNA laddering at 24 h after treatment with 400 J/m2 UVB were similar in KBM and KBP clones (data not shown). These experiments suggested that the presence of the PAF-R accelerated the induction of apoptosis in response to a lethal dose of UVB radiation.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   The kinetics of UVB-induced apoptosis in KB cells. A, dose response curve for UVB-induced apoptosis in KB cells. Cells were irradiated with various doses of UVB as indicated and stained with DAPI 6 h after irradiation. B, time course of UVB-induced apoptosis in KB cells. Cells were exposed to 400 J/m2 UVB and stained with DAPI at the indicated times. Each point represents the percentage of apoptosis ± S.D. from at least four separate experiments with representative KBM and KBP clones. Similar results were obtained in one other KBM and two other KBP clones. An asterisk denotes statistically (p < 0.05) significant difference in UVB-induced apoptosis between KBM and KBP cells.

Effects of PAF-R Antagonists on UVB-induced Apoptosis-- To confirm that the differences in UVB-induced apoptosis between KBM and KBP cells were because of PAF-R activation, the ability of the competitive PAF-R antagonists A-85783 (35) or WEB 2086 (36) to inhibit the accelerated induction of apoptosis seen in PAF-R expressing KB cells was evaluated. Pretreatment of cells with A-85783 (Fig. 4A) and WEB 2086 (Fig. 4B) for 30 min prior to irradiation with 400 J/m2 decreased the amount of apoptosis seen in KBP cells at 6 h. As expected, these PAF antagonists had no effect on UVB-induced apoptosis in KBM cells. Although PAF-R antagonists could inhibit the augmentation of UVB-induced apoptosis in KBP cells at 6 h, these compounds had no effect on UVB-induced apoptosis in KBP or KBM cells at 24 h (data not shown).


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   The effect of PAF-R antagonists on UVB-induced apoptosis in KB cells. Cells were pretreated with indicated concentrations (µM) of A-87573 (A) or WEB 2086 (B) or Me2SO vehicle (0.5%) 30 min prior to UVB irradiation (400 J/m2). Each point represents the mean percentage of apoptosis ± S.D. at 6 h by use of DAPI staining from at least three separate experiments with representative KBM and KBP clones. Similar results were obtained in one other KBM and two other KBP clones. An asterisk denotes statistically (p < 0.05) significant inhibition of UVB-induced apoptosis in KBP cells by PAF-R antagonist.

The ability of exogenous PAF to modulate apoptosis in response to a sublethal dose of UVB was next investigated. Because PAF is rapidly degraded by acetylhydrolases found in serum (37), the metabolically stable PAF-R agonist CPAF (38) was used in these experiments. Treatment of KBM or KBP cells with CPAF alone (1 nM to 1 µM) did not induce apoptosis (data not shown). However, high (2-10 µM) doses of CPAF exerted cytotoxic effects on both KBP and KBM clones, suggesting a PAF-R-independent process (data not shown). As shown in Fig. 5, a combination of 500 nM CPAF and irradiation with a sublethal (200 J/m2) dose of UVB resulted in a further increase in the amount of apoptosis in KBP cells over UVB irradiation alone. Altogether, these findings indicate that the difference in UVB responsiveness between KBP and KBM clones is because of the presence of the PAF-R.


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   The effect of CPAF on UVB-induced apoptosis in KB cells. Immediately following UVB irradiation (200 J/m2), 500 nM CPAF or ethanol vehicle (0.1%) was added to cells. Each point represents the mean percentage of apoptosis ± S.D. at 6 h by use of DAPI staining from at least three experiments with representative KBM and KBP clones. Similar results were obtained in one other KBM and two other KBP clones. One asterisk denotes that UVB treatment of KBP cells resulted in a statistically significant (p < 0.05) increase in apoptosis compared with similarly treated KBM cells. Two asterisks denotes that UVB + CPAF treatment of KBP cells resulted in a significant (p < 0.05) increase in apoptosis over KBP cells treated with UVB radiation alone.

As shown in Fig. 3B, irradiation of KBM and KBP cells with 400 J/m2 UVB resulted in essentially equal amounts of apoptosis at 16 and 24 h. Further experiments were performed to assess whether sublethal UVB doses at these later time points have a differential effect between KBP and KBM cells. In these experiments, the amount of apoptosis induced by low dose (100 and 200 J/m2) UVB on KBP and KBM cells at 24 h were compared. Treatment of KBP cells with these lower doses of UVB resulted in increased cytotoxicity over similarly treated KBM cells (Fig. 6). In particular, irradiation of KB cells with 100 J/m2 UVB induced apoptosis selectively in KBP cells at 24 h.


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   The effect of low dose UVB treatment on KB cell apoptosis at 24 h. Cells were irradiated with various doses of UVB as indicated and stained with DAPI 24 h after irradiation. Each point represents the percentage of apoptosis ± S.D. from at least four separate experiments from representative KBM and KBP clones. Similar results were obtained in one other KBM and two other KBP clones. An asterisk denotes statistically (p < 0.05) significant difference in UVB-induced apoptosis between KBM and KBP cells in response to both 100 and 200 J/m2.

Effects of UVB on KB PAF Biosynthesis-- Our finding that the expression of the PAF-R in an epidermal cell line augmented UVB-induced apoptosis and was inhibited by two structurally dissimilar competitive PAF-R antagonists implied that UVB could induce the biosynthesis of PAF-R agonist(s) in these cells. To test whether this UVB-induced agonistic activity was because of PAF, KBM and KBP clones were treated with UVB (320-2650 J/m2), and PAF (1-hexadecyl-2-acetyl-GPC) and the PAF-R agonist 1-palmitoyl-2-acetyl-GPC were measured by mass spectrometry (16). As shown in Fig. 7, UVB treatment induced the biosynthesis of both PAF and PAPC in KBP cells, with significant levels of PAF and PAPC measured following irradiation of all doses of UVB tested. However, UVB treatment of KBM clones did not result in significant amounts of PAF or PAPC biosynthesis over untreated cells (Fig. 7). Inasmuch as PAF-R activation is a known stimulus for PAF biosynthesis in PMNs (37) and epidermal cells (16), our finding that UVB stimulated PAF biosynthesis only in PAF-R-expressing KB cells suggested the possibility that this oxidative stimulus induced the production of oxidized phospholipid species with PAF-R agonistic activity (9, 10). These non-PAF PAF-R agonists produced in response to UVB-induced lipid oxidation would be expected to induce PAF and PAPC biosynthesis only in PAF-R-expressing KBP (but not KBM) cells.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   UVB treatment results in PAF and PAPC biosynthesis in KBP but not KBM cells. KB cells were irradiated with various doses of UVB followed by measurement of 1-hexadecyl-2-acetyl GPC (PAF; A) or PAPC (B) by gas chromatography mass spectrometry. Each point represents the amount of PAF or PAPC in ng/106 cells ± S.D. from at least four separate experiments using representative KBM and KBP clones. Similar results were seen in one other KBM and two other KBP clones. Irradiation of KBP cells resulted in statistically (p < 0.05) significant increases in PAF and PAPC over unstimulated cells at all UVB dosages tested.

The next studies investigated this hypothesis that oxidative damage with the subsequent production of non-PAF PAF-R agonists mediated UVB-induced PAF biosynthesis in KBP cells by assessing the ability of antioxidants to inhibit UVB-induced PAF biosynthesis in KBP cells. Pretreatment of KBP cells with the antioxidants N-acetyl cysteine, TMTU, and alpha -tocopherol (vitamin E) inhibited subsequent UVB-induced PAF biosynthesis as shown in Fig. 8A. These antioxidants had similar inhibitory effects on UVB-induced PAPC biosynthesis in KBP cells. In two separate experiments using two different KBP clones, TMTU and vitamin E had no effect on PAF (or PAPC) biosynthesis induced by a 5-min treatment with 250 nM CPAF, suggesting that antioxidants did not exert their effects in this system through direct inhibition of PAF-R-mediated PAF biosynthesis. Pretreatment of KBP cells with these antioxidants also resulted in diminished apoptosis in response to 400 J/m2 UVB at 6 h (Fig. 8B). Altogether, these findings suggest the possibility that PAF-R augmentation of UVB-induced apoptosis is mediated in part by UVB-induced production of PAF-R-agonistic oxidized lipid species.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   The effect of antioxidants on UVB-induced PAF biosynthesis and apoptosis in KB cells. A, UVB-induced PAF and PAPC biosynthesis. KBP cells were pretreated for 30 min with the antioxidants N-acetyl cysteine (10 mM), TMTU (1 mM), and vitamin E (10 units/ml) or Me2SO vehicle (0.5%), plates were washed with HBSS, 1 ml of 0.25% bovine serum albumin in HBSS was added, cells were irradiated with 660 J/m2 UVB, and PAF was measured by gas chromatography mass spectrometry. Each point represents the mean ± S.D. percentage of control PAF from at least three separate experiments using a representative KBP clone. Similar results were seen in two other KBP clones. B, UVB-induced apoptosis. KB cells were pretreated for 30 min with identical doses of the antioxidants or Me2SO vehicle for 30 min, and apoptosis was assessed by DAPI staining 6 h following treatment with 400 J/m2 UVB. Each point represents the mean percentage of apoptosis ± S.D. from at least three experiments with representative KBM and KBP clones. Similar results were seen in one other KBM and two other KBP clones. Pretreatment of KBP cells with all three of the antioxidants resulted in statistically significant (p < 0.05) decreases in apoptosis in KBP cells as well as inhibition of UVB-induced PAF biosynthesis.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

These studies provide the first evidence that the epidermal PAF-R may be involved in UVB-induced apoptosis. The study of PAF/PAF-R is limited by the rapid metabolism of PAF and the fact that PAF metabolites can exert biological activity independent of the PAF-R (5-7). In addition, structurally similar lysophosphatidylcholines can signal various cell types, again, independent of the PAF-R (39). The model system used in these studies was developed to overcome some of the current limitations in the study of PAF/PAF-R and to account for the diverse ligands recognized by the PAF-R (9-14).

KB cells are a human epidermal cell line originally derived from a patient with a nasopharyngeal carcinoma (34). KB cells are often used as a model of keratinocytes because they synthesize many of the same cytokines including interleukins 1, 6, and 8 and TNF-alpha . KB cells also respond to TNF-alpha , and UVB treatment of these cells induces prostaglandin and TNF-alpha synthesis similar to primary cultures of human keratinocytes (40, 41). In contrast to normal human keratinocytes, KB cells do not express PAF-R mRNA (33) and lack PAF-R protein by radioligand binding studies (15, 33) and immunohistochemical studies using a specific PAF-R polyclonal antibody (15). In addition, treatment of these cells with PAF or PAF-R agonists does not trigger intracellular calcium mobilization, arachidonic acid release, or PAF production (16, 33). However, KB cells stimulated with the calcium ionophore A23187 synthesize PAF (16), indicating intact, intracellular mechanisms for PAF biosynthesis in this PAF-R-negative cell line. As described previously, KB cells were transduced with the human leukocyte PAF-R cDNA using a replication-defective retrovirus (33). To control for possible effects of integration of a retrovirus into genomic DNA, KB cells were also transduced with the empty MSCV 2.1 retrovirus alone (KBM). With both PAF-R-positive (KBP) and -negative (KBM) cells, this model system can help to discern PAF-R-dependent versus PAF-R-independent effects of PAF. In particular, this model system can account for non-PAF PAF-R agonists such as sn-2 short chain phosphocholines, which have been shown to be produced in response to lipid peroxidation (reviewed in Refs. 42 and 43).

Expression of the PAF-R in the PAF-R-negative human epidermal cell line KB resulted in an increased susceptibility to UVB-induced apoptosis. This heightened effect of UVB on KBP over control KBM cells took two forms. High dose (400 J/m2) UVB treatment of KBP cells decreased the lag time between treatment of the cells and induction of apoptosis (Fig. 3B). Low dose (100 J/m2) UVB resulted in selective apoptosis in KBP cells (Fig. 6). Because KBP cells undergo apoptosis in response to doses of UVB that do not affect KBM cells, we conclude that activation of the PAF-R lowers the threshold of a cell to undergo apoptosis in response to UVB in this model system.

That stimulation of the epidermal PAF-R can prime these cells for UVB-induced apoptosis is consistent with previous reports that PAF increases apoptosis induced by a calcium ionophore in immature T cells (30) and by FAS in human eosinophils (31). In these disparate model systems as well as in the current studies, PAF-R activation alone was not an adequate stimulus to induce apoptosis. This priming effect of the PAF-R on apoptosis resembles PAF effects on PMN superoxide production. PAF alone does not induce detectable superoxide production in PMNs unless they are pretreated with cytochalasin B or propranolol; yet pretreatment with PAF can augment PMN superoxide production in response to fMLP or C5A (44).

Consistent with the ability of the PAF-R to modulate UVB-induced apoptosis was our finding that UVB treatment of KBP cells resulted in PAF and PAPC biosynthesis. Interestingly, UVB irradiation did not stimulate PAF/PAPC production in KBM cells. One possible explanation for this disparity could be that UVB treatment does not trigger PAF biosynthesis directly but instead stimulates production of non-PAF PAF-R agonists like short chain sn-2 oxidized phosphocholines, and the PAF/PAPC measured in KBP cells are subsequent to PAF-R stimulation. This notion is supported by the recent report that cigarette smoke, a known inducer of oxidative stress, triggers the production of non-PAF PAF-R agonists in rodents in vivo (45). That PAF or structurally similar compounds synthesized in response to oxidative damage could be involved in apoptosis is suggested by the recent report that overexpression of PAF acetylhydrolase II (which can inactivate short chain sn-2 phosphocholines) in Chinese hamster ovary cells is protective against oxidative stress-induced apoptosis (46). Our finding that antioxidants inhibited both UVB-induced (but not CPAF-induced) PAF biosynthesis as well as the augmentation of apoptosis in KBP cells (Fig. 8, A and B) is consistent with a role for PAF-like lipids formed by phospholipid oxidation in these processes. The nature of this UVB-induced PAF-like activity synthesized by KB cells is unknown. Ongoing studies have found that lipid extracts from both UVB-treated KBP and KBM cells (but not unstimulated cells) have PAF-like activity (by measurement of intracellular calcium mobilization using Indo-1-loaded KBP versus KBM cells). We are currently in the process of characterizing this UVB-induced PAF-R agonistic activity.

In addition to the ability of oxygen radicals to induce the production of PAF and oxidatively fragmented GPCs with PAF-like activity, these reactive chemical species have also been reported to irreversibly inactivate human plasma PAF-acetylhydrolase (47). Thus, oxidative stress could generate exaggerated PAF-R-mediated responses. It is possible that a portion of the PAF we measure in response to UVB stimulation could be because of an inhibition of its metabolism.

Human keratinocytes undergo programmed cell death in response to numerous stimuli in vitro, and epidermal apoptosis is seen in a wide range of cutaneous diseases. Current studies in our laboratory are characterizing the types of cytotoxic stimuli that can be modulated by PAF-R activation. In addition to UVB, we find that TNF-alpha -induced apoptosis is also increased in KBP over KBM cells, suggesting that the PAF-R can modulate other cytotoxic stimuli in epidermal cells. Of note, TNF-alpha and UVB share the ability to induce reactive oxygen species (48) and PAF biosynthesis (27). Future studies are planned to define the types of cytotoxic stimuli that are augmented by expression of the PAF-R, the nature of the PAF-like species involved, as well as the mechanism(s) by which PAF-R activation increases epidermal cell cytotoxicity. An understanding of the process by which PAF-R stimulation can amplify epidermal cell cytotoxicity may provide insights into the priming phenomenon, as well as an understanding of the regulation of apoptosis in epidermal cells.

Although human keratinocytes synthesize PAF (16) and express functional PAF-Rs (15), the role of the PAF-R in epidermal cell function is not clear. These studies suggest that one of the functions of the epidermal PAF-R could be to augment cytotoxic damage in response to noxious agents like UVB radiation. These findings may have clinical implications because certain populations are potentially more susceptible to PAF effects because of deficiency of the PAF metabolizing enzyme acetyl hydrolase (49). A better understanding of the functions of the PAF system in keratinocyte biology and cutaneous inflammation may lead to therapeutic interventions designed around this lipid mediator.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by grants from the Dermatology Foundation, The Pharmaceutical Research Manufacturer's Association, and The Showalter Memorial Foundation and by National Institutes of Health Grants K08AR1993 and HL34303.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: H. B Wells Center for Pediatric Research, James Whitcomb Riley Hospital for Children, Rm. 2659, Indiana University School of Medicine, 702 Barnhill Dr., Indianapolis, IN 46202. Fax: 317-274-5378; E-mail: jtravers{at}wpo.iupui.edu.

1 The abbreviations used are: PAF, platelet-activating factor; PAF-R, PAF receptor; UVB, ultraviolet B radiation; PAPC, 1-palmitoyl-2-acetyl-glycerophosphocholine; CPAF; 1-hexadecyl-2-N-methylcarbamoyl-glycerophosphocholine; PARP, poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase; DAPI, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; TMTU, 1,1,3,3-tetramethyl-2-thiourea; PMN, polymorphonuclear leukocyte; GPC, glycerophosphocholine; KBP, KB cell clones transduced with PAF-R; KBM, KB cell clones transduced with control MSCV2.1 retrovirus; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; HBSS, Hanks' balanced salt solution; TNF-alpha , tumor necrosis factor alpha .

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Prescott, S. M., Zimmerman, G. A., and McIntyre, T. M. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 17381-17384[Free Full Text]
  2. Hanahan, D. J. (1996) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 55, 483-509[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Roth, M., Nauck, M., Yousefi, S., Tamn, M., Blaser, K., Perruchoud, A. P., and Simon, H. (1996) J. Exp. Med. 184, 191-198[Abstract]
  4. Levesque, J. P., Hatzfeld, A., and Hatzfeld, J. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 6494-6500[Abstract]
  5. Wilcox, R. W., Wykle, R. L., and Bass, D. A. (1987) Lipids 22, 800-806[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Travers, J. B., Sprecher, H., and Fertel, R. H. (1990) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1042, 193-198[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Bauldry, S. A., Wykle, R. L., and Bass, D. A. (1991) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1084, 178-185[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Izumi, T., and Shimizu, T. (1995) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1259, 317-329[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Smiley, P. L., Stremler, K. E., Prescott, S. M., Zimmerman, G. A., and McIntyre, T. M. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 11104-11110[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Heery, J. M., Kozak, M., Stafforini, D. M., Jones, D. A., Zimmerman, G. A., McIntyre, T. M., and Prescott, S. M. (1995) J. Clin. Invest. 96, 2322-2330[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Nakamura, M., Honda, Z., Waga, I., Matsumoto, T., Noma, M., and Shimizu, T. (1992) FEBS Lett. 314, 125-130[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Cundell, D., Gerard, N. P., Gerard, C., Idanpaan-Helkkila, I., and Tuomanen, E. I. (1995) Nature 377, 435-438[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Triggiani, M., Goldman, D. W., and Chilton, F. H. (1991) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1084, 41-48[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. O'Flaherty, J. T., Tessner, T., Greene, D., Redman, J., and Wykle, R. L. (1994) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1210, 209-217[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Travers, J. B., Huff, J. C., Rola-Pleszczynski, M., Gelfand, E. W., Morelli, J. G., and Murphy, R. C. (1995) J. Invest. Dermatol. 105, 816-823[Abstract]
  16. Travers, J. B., Harrison, K. A., Johnson, C. A., Clay, K. L., Morelli, J. G., and Murphy, R. C. (1996) J. Invest. Dermatol. 107, 88-94[Abstract]
  17. Sheng, Y., and Birkle, D. L. (1995) Curr. Eye Res. 14, 341-347[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Mallet, A. I., and Cunningham, F. M. (1985) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 126, 192-197[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Grandel, K. E., Farr, R. S., Wanderer, A. A., Eisentadt, T. C., and Wassermann, S. I. (1985) N. Engl. J. Med. 313, 405-410[Abstract]
  20. Stewart, M. S., Cameron, G. S., and Pence, B. C. (1996) J. Invest. Dermatol. 106, 1086-1089[Abstract]
  21. Sanchez, Y., and lledge, S. J. (1995) Bioessays 17, 545-548[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Cotton, J., and Spandau, D. F. (1997) Radiat. Res. 147, 148-155[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Arends, M. J., Morris, R. G., and Wyllie, A. H. (1990) Am. J. Pathol. 136, 593-608[Abstract]
  24. Kerr, J. F. R. (1972) J. Pathol. Bacteriol. 90, 419-435
  25. Kerr, J. F. R., Wyllie, A. H., and Currie, A. R. (1972) Br. J. Cancer 26, 239-257[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Porter, A. G., Ng, P., and Janicke, R. U. (1997) BioEssays 19, 501-507[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Camussi, G., Bussilino, F., Salvidio, G., and Bagglioni, C. (1987) J. Exp. Med. 166, 1390-1404[Abstract]
  28. Lewis, M. S., Whatley, R. E., Cain, P., McIntyre, T. M., Prescott, S. M., and Zimmerman, G. A. (1988) J. Clin. Invest. 82, 2045-2055[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Alloatti, G., Montrucchio, G., and Camussi, G. (1994) J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 269, 766-771[Abstract]
  30. Azzouzi, B. E., Jurgens, P., Benveniste, J., and Thomas, Y. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 190, 320-324[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Matsumoto, H., Schleimer, R. P., Saito, H., Iikura, Y., and Bochner, B. S. (1995) Blood 86, 1437-1443[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Toledano, B. J., Bastien, Y., Noya, F., Baruchel, S., and Mazer, B. (1997) J. Immunol. 158, 3705-3715[Abstract]
  33. Pei, Y., Barber, L. A., Murphy, R. C., Johnson, C. A., Kelley, S. W., Dy, L. C., Fertel, R. H., Nguyen, T. M., Williams, D. A., and Travers, J. B. (1998) J. Immunol., in press
  34. Eagle, H. (1955) Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 89, 362-366
  35. Sheppard, G. S., Pireh, D., Carrera, G., Bures, M., Heyman, H. R., Steinman, D., Davidsen, S. K., Phillips, J., Guinn, D. E., May, P. D., Conway, R. G., Rhein, D. A., Calhoun, W. C., Albert, D. H., Magoc, T. J., Carter, W., and Summers, J. B. (1994) J. Med. Chem. 37, 2011-2019[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Casal-Stenzel, J., Muacevic, G., and Wever, K. H. (1987) Br. J. Dermatol. 118, 475-480
  37. Farr, R. S., Cox, C. P., Wardlow, M. L., and Jorgensen, R. (1980) Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 15, 318-330[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Tessner, T. G., O'Flaherty, J. T., and Wykle, R. L. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 4794-4799[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Stoll, L. L., and Spector, A. A. (1993) Am. J. Physiol. 264, C885-C890[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Grewe, M., Trefzer, U., Ballhorn, A., Gyufko, K., Henninger, H., and Krutmann, J. (1993) J. Invest. Dermatol. 101, 528-531[Abstract]
  41. Kock, A., Schwarz, T., Kirnbauer, R., Urbanski, A., Perry, P., Ansel, J. C., and Luger, T. A. (1990) J. Exp. Med. 172, 1609-1614[Abstract]
  42. Zimmerman, G. A., Prescott, S. M., and McIntyre, T. M. (1995) J. Nutr. 125, 16615-11618
  43. Murphy, R. C. (1996) Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 416, 51-58[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Pinckard, R. N., and Prihoda, T. J. (1996) J. Leukocyte Biol. 59, 219-224[Abstract]
  45. Lehr, H. A., Weyrich, A. S., Saetzler, R. K., Jurek, A., Arfors, K. E., Zimmerman, G. A., Prescott, S. M., and McIntyre, T. M. (1997) J. Clin. Invest. 99, 2358-2364[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Matsuzawa, A., Hattori, K., Aoki, J., Arai, H., and Inoue, K. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 32315-32320[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Ambrosio, G., Oriente, A., Napoli, C., Palumbo, G., Chiariello, P., Marone, G., Condorelli, M., Chiariello, M., and Triggiani, M. (1994) J. Clin. Invest. 93, 2408-2416[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Ferro, T. J., Gertzberg, N., Selden, L., Neumann, P., and Johnson, A. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 272, L979-L988[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Miwa, M., Miyake, T., Yamanaka, T., Sugatani, J., Suzuki, Y., Sakata, S., Araki, Y., and Matsumoto, M. (1988) J. Clin. Invest. 82, 1983-1991[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.