Characterization of Recombinant CD45 Cytoplasmic Domain Proteins
EVIDENCE FOR INTRAMOLECULAR AND INTERMOLECULAR INTERACTIONS*

Jackie FelbergDagger and Pauline Johnson§

From the Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3, Canada

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

CD45 is a transmembrane two-domain tyrosine phosphatase required for efficient signal transduction initiated by lymphocyte antigen receptors. As with most transmembrane two-domain phosphatases, the role of the second phosphatase domain is unclear. In this study, recombinant CD45 cytoplasmic domain proteins purified from bacteria were used to evaluate the function of the individual phosphatase domains. A recombinant protein expressing the membrane-proximal region, first phosphatase domain, and spacer region of CD45 (rD1) was catalytically active and found to exist primarily as a dimer. In contrast to this, a recombinant protein expressing the spacer region, the second phosphatase domain and the carboxy tail of CD45 (rD2) existed as a monomer and had no catalytic activity against any of the substrates tested. Comparison of rD1 with the recombinant protein expressing the entire cytoplasmic domain of CD45 (rD1/D2) indicated that rD1/D2 was 2-3-fold more catalytically active, was more thermostable, and existed primarily as a monomer. Limited trypsin digestion of rD1/D2 provided evidence for a noncovalent association between an N-terminal 27-kDa fragment and a C-terminal 53-kDa fragment, suggesting an intramolecular interaction. Furthermore, rD1 was found to specifically associate with rD2 in an in vitro binding assay. Taken together, these data provide evidence for an intramolecular interaction occurring in the cytoplasmic domain of CD45. In the absence of the C-terminal region containing the second phosphatase domain, intermolecular interactions occur, resulting in dimer formation.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

CD45 is a transmembrane protein-tyrosine phosphatase (PTP)1 that is expressed on all nucleated hematopoietic cells. Its phosphatase activity is required for efficient signal transduction initiated by lymphocyte antigen receptors, which is essential for T cell development and T and B cell activation (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). In T cells, CD45 has been shown to dephosphorylate p56lck and p59fyn in vitro and to be responsible for their dephosphorylation in vivo (3-7). The role of CD45 in the dephosphorylation of p56lck and p59fyn is likely to be a necessary prerequisite step for their effective participation in T cell receptor-mediated signaling events. In vitro, CD45 can dephosphorylate several artificial and phosphopeptide substrates, yet only a limited number of substrates have been identified for CD45 in vivo. How substrate specificity is achieved in the cell is not yet understood. However, it is of interest to note that CD45 can associate with p56lck, a major substrate for CD45 in T cells, both in vitro (8, 9) and in T cells, albeit with low stoichiometry (10, 11).

It is also not known how the phosphatase activity of CD45 is regulated. By analogy with receptors possessing tyrosine kinase activity, it is possible that receptor tyrosine phosphatases may be regulated by dimerization. It has been suggested by cross-linking studies in T cells that CD45 may exist in dimeric form together with CD45AP, a 30-kDa CD45-associated protein (12). Induced dimerization of an epidermal growth factor receptor-CD45 chimera with epidermal growth factor has been shown to inhibit the restoration of T cell signaling events (13), suggesting the possibility that CD45 activity may be regulated by dimerization. In addition, the first phosphatase domain (PTP-D1) of a related phosphatase, RPTPalpha , crystallized as a dimer, with the membrane-proximal region of one PTP domain inserted into the catalytic region of the second PTP domain. It was predicted that if such an interaction occurred under more physiological conditions, phosphatase activity would be inhibited (14). However, to date, no direct evidence has been obtained for the formation of CD45 dimers.

CD45, like RPTPalpha , belongs to the growing family of protein-tyrosine phosphatases. For most members of the transmembrane, two-domain phosphatase family, the majority of catalytic activity has been shown to reside in PTP-D1 and the function of the second phosphatase domain (PTP-D2) is unclear. PTP-D2 of RPTPalpha has been shown to possess catalytic activity, albeit at much lower levels than PTP-D1 (15). In other transmembrane PTPs, no phosphatase activity has been detected for PTP-D2, which in some instances lack key residues involved in catalysis (Refs. 16-19 and reviewed in Refs. 20-22). In these cases, a regulatory role for PTP-D2 has been suggested, and in some two-domain PTPs, the presence of PTP-D2 has been shown to be required for optimal PTP-D1 activity (15, 17, 19). For CD45, contradictory data exists as to whether CD45 is an active phosphatase in the absence of PTP-D2 (17, 18, 23). Recent data shows that CD45 PTP-D1 is active when coupled to a maltose-binding protein fusion partner but is not active when the fusion partner is proteolytically removed (24). Likewise, conflicting data exists as to whether CD45 PTP-D2 is an active phosphatase. No catalytic activity has been attributed to CD45 PTP-D2 when expressed in vitro as a recombinant protein (18) or after the essential cysteine in PTP-D1 has been mutated to a serine and expressed in vitro (16-18). Mutation of the critical cysteine in PTP-D1, but not in PTP-D2, prevented the restoration of CD45-mediated T cell signaling events (25), indicating that phosphatase activity residing in PTP-D1, and not PTP-D2, was essential for this function. However, expression in eukaryotic cells of an active, truncated form of CD45 lacking the catalytic cysteine present in PTP-D1 has led researchers to suggest that PTP-D2 has phosphatase activity (26). Thus the function of PTP-D2 of CD45 is unclear.

To clarify the function of the individual PTP domains of CD45 and to determine the role of these domains in the enzymatic function of CD45, recombinant CD45 cytoplasmic domain proteins were produced in Escherichia coli, purified, and analyzed. It was found that rD1 of CD45 was an active protein-tyrosine phosphatase in the absence of PTP-D2 and was present as a dimer. In contrast, no phosphatase activity was detected for rD2 of CD45. In the two-domain CD45 cytoplasmic domain protein, the presence of PTP-D2 enhanced the stability of the enzyme and was required for optimal enzymatic activity. Specific binding of rD1 to rD2 and the association of N- and C-terminal tryptic fragments of rD1/D2 provided evidence for an intramolecular interaction occurring in rD1/D2. In the absence of the C-terminal region including PTP-D2, intermolecular interactions occur, leading to the formation of rD1 dimers.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Materials-- Nickel-NTA-agarose was from Qiagen Inc. (Santa Clarita, CA.), Sephadex G-25M PD-10, MonoQ and Superose 12 columns were from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. p-Nitrophenyl phosphate (pNPP) was from Pierce, tyrosine-phosphorylated peptides (CD3zeta pY83, LGRREEpYDVLEKKRA; fyn pY531; TATEPQpYQPGENL; src pY416; LIEDNEpYTARQGA; cdc2 pY15; KIGEGTpYGVVYKA; and PDGF-R pY1021; NEGDNDpYIIPLPD) were from Dr. F. Jirik and Dr. I. Clark-Lewis (Biomedical Research Center, University of British Columbia). GST-p56lck was made and purified as described (9), and 4G10-antiphosphotyrosine antibody was purchased from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. (Lake Placid, N.Y.). Anti-His antibody was from Amersham, and sequencing grade trypsin was from Promega (Madison, WI.). The GST-Crk-SH3 construct was from Dr. M. Matsuda (International Medical Center of Japan, Tokyo, Japan), and 6-His-glucosidase-cellulose binding domain fusion protein was from G. Doheny (University of British Columbia).

Recombinant DNA Constructs-- Recombinant 6-His-tagged murine CD45 cytoplasmic domain proteins, rD1/D2, containing residues 564-1268 (numbered as in Ref. 27) and the catalytically inactive protein, with a mutation of cysteine 817 to serine (C817S), were as described (28). A truncation mutant (rD1) encoding residues 564 to 927, containing the membrane-proximal region, PTP-D1, and the spacer region, was constructed previously (18) and subcloned into the pET-3D-6HisIEGR vector (28). Another truncation mutant (rD2) encoding residues 901-1268, which contains part of the spacer region, PTP-D2, and the carboxy tail, was made by removing a DraIII fragment and adding a linker (5'-AGATCTCCA-3') to introduce a BglII site. A second construct encoding the membrane-proximal region, PTP-D2, and carboxy tail (rD2.2) was made by deleting a HincII-NdeI fragment containing residues 649 to 943 and adding a HincII-NdeI linker (5'-TATGGAACAACATT-3'), restoring residues 940 to 943. BglII fragments containing rD2 and rD2.2 in pBluescript SK- (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) were subcloned into pET-3D-6HisIEGR (28), and rD2 was also subcloned into pGEX-3X vector (Amersham).

Expression and Purification of Recombinant Proteins-- Vectors were expressed in BL21(DE3) (29) or XL1-Blue E. coli (Stratagene). rD2.2 was expressed in conjunction with a pT-Trx vector (30). rD1/D2, the C817S mutant protein, rD1, and rD2 were purified essentially as described (28) with the following modifications. Cultures were induced at 26 °C, and all other steps were at 4 °C. Cells were lysed in 100 µg/ml lysozyme, 0.5% Triton X-100, 20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, pH 7.2, 0.025% beta -mercaptoethanol, 1 mM EDTA. Proteins bound to Nickel-NTA-agarose were washed with lysis buffer plus 0.5 M NaCl and 1.0 M NaCl and eluted in 1 M imidazole, pH 7.2, 150 mM NaCl, 0.025% beta -mercaptoethanol, and 0.1% Triton X-100. The eluent was passed through a PD-10 column equilibrated in 90% buffer A (20 mM Tris, pH 7.2, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.025% beta -mercaptoethanol), 10% buffer B (1 M NaCl in buffer A) and eluted from a MonoQ column using a linear gradient of 10 to 40% buffer B. rD2.2 was purified as above except instead of separation on a MonoQ column, it was loaded onto a Superose 12 column equilibrated in 20 mM Tris, pH 7.2, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.025% beta -mercaptoethanol, 160 mM NaCl. All buffers used for protein purification contained 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 1.0 µg/ml each of pepstatin, leupeptin, and aprotinin. After purification, recombinant proteins were concentrated using the Centricon 10 concentrator from Amicon (Beverly, MA.), glycerol was added to 50%, and proteins were stored at -80 °C. GST and GST-rD2 were purified as per manufacturer's instructions and left bound to glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads (Amersham), glycerol was added to 50%, and GST and GST-rD2 were stored at -80 °C.

Phosphatase Assays-- Assays using the phosphopeptides as substrates were performed as described (31). Purified recombinant proteins were diluted in 10 µl of phosphatase buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.2, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% beta -mercaptoethanol), and assayed at equal molar concentrations (23 nM final concentration) with 10 µl of phosphopeptide (15 µM to 2 mM final concentration). For assays using pNPP, 5 µl of recombinant protein diluted in phosphatase buffer (final concentration 7.5 nM) was added to 195 µl of 19 µM to 2.5 mM pNPP at 30 °C to start the reaction. The increase in absorbance at 405 nm was monitored continuously using a SOFTmax PRO kinetic analysis program in a SpectraMax microplate spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). A molar extinction coefficient of 1.8 × 104 M-1 cm-1 was used to calculate the concentration of p-nitrophenolate. pH optimum curves were obtained by measuring phosphatase activity of equal molar concentrations of rD1 and rD1/D2 (ranging from 22 to 50 nM final concentrations), 13.5 mM pNPP as substrate in the following buffers plus 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% beta -mercaptoethanol, 50 mM sodium citrate for pH 4.3 to 6.0, 50 mM carbonate/bicarbonate for pH 6.8 and 10.1, and 50 mM Tris for pH 7.2 to 8.8. Thermostability experiments were performed where 233 nM rD1/D2 and rD1 were incubated at temperatures ranging from 30 to 65 °C for 5 min before phosphatase activity was measured at 30 °C by adding 5 µl of enzyme to 195 µl of 2.5 mM pNPP.

Dephosphorylation of GST-p56lck-- This was performed at 30 °C as described (32). 5 µl of rD1 or rD1/D2 (60 nM) was added to 5 µl of autophosphorylated GST-p56lck (55 nM) to initiate the reaction. The reaction was stopped by immersion in a dry ice/ethanol bath, samples were electrophoresed on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Immobilon P, Millipore Corp., Bedford MA.), and the amount of phosphorylated substrate remaining was determined by Western blot analysis with 4G10 antiphosphotyrosine antibody diluted 1/10,000 as the primary antibody and horseradish peroxidase-labeled goat anti-mouse antibody diluted 1/5000 (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Inc., Birmingham, AL) as the secondary antibody. The blot was developed using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents (Amersham) and exposed to BioMax film from Eastman Kodak Co.

Limited Trypsin Digestion-- Trypsin was added to 1.5 µg of rD1/D2 in a total volume of 20 µl of substrate buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 1 mM CaCl2) at ratios of 1:100, 1:50, 1:25, and 1:10 w/w. The digest was incubated at 37 °C for 1 to 4 h and terminated by the addition of 1 µl of 100 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. 5 µl of each sample was run on a native polyacrylamide gel, and 15 µl was run on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel under reducing conditions.

N-terminal Sequencing-- 12 µg of rD1/D2 was digested with trypsin for 1.5 h at 1:25 w/w rD1/D2:trypsin, reducing sample buffer was added at 37 °C for 15 min, and the sample was electrophoresed on a 12.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred to Immobilon P (polyvinylidene difluoride) membrane. The membrane was stained with 0.025% Coomassie R-250, the 53-kDa and 27-kDa bands were excised, and the N-terminal sequence was obtained from the Nucleic Acid-Protein Service (NAPS) unit (University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada).

Gel Filtration-- A Superose 12 gel filtration column was equilibrated with 50 mM Tris, pH7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 0.025% beta -mercaptoethanol. The column was calibrated with globular protein gel filtration standards from Bio-Rad (gamma globulin (158 kDa), ovalbumin (44 kDa), myoglobin (17 kDa)) and bovine albumin fraction V (67 kDa) from Life Technologies, Inc. rD1, rD2, rD2.2, and rD1/D2 were each applied separately to the column in concentrations ranging from 1 to 100 µg/ml for rD1, rD2 at 5 to 20 µg/ml, rD2.2 at 100 µg/ml, and rD1/D2 at 5 µg/ml to 1 mg/ml.

Native Gel Electrophoresis-- 20% homogeneous native polyacrylamide gels were run on the Pharmacia PhastSystem according to manufacturer's instructions. Bovine serum albumin (67 kDa) and ovalbumin (44 kDa) were used for size reference.

Protein Binding Assay-- 1 µg of GST fusion protein bound to glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads was washed with binding buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Nonidet P40, and 0.025% beta -mercaptoethanol), and 1 µg of soluble 6-His-tagged protein was added to the immobilized protein. Binding buffer was added to a final volume of 50 µl, and the mixture was incubated on ice, shaking for 2 h. The mixture was then washed 5 times with 1 ml of binding buffer and separated on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, and immunoblotted with anti-His antibody diluted 1/1000 as the primary and horseradish-peroxidase-labeled goat anti-mouse antibody diluted 1/2500 as the secondary. Blots were developed as described above. The membrane was then stained with Coomassie Blue to visualize the immobilized proteins and subjected to densitometry scan analysis.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Catalytic Activity of the Individual Phosphatase Domains of CD45-- Recombinant 6-His-tagged CD45 cytoplasmic domain proteins: rD1, containing the membrane-proximal region, PTP-D1, and the spacer region, (residues 564-927); rD2, containing part of the spacer region, PTP-D2, and the carboxy tail (residues 901-1268); a second PTP-D2 construct, rD2.2, containing the membrane-proximal region, PTP-D2, and the carboxy tail (residues 649-939 deleted); the full-length cytoplasmic domain proteins (residues 564-1268), rD1/D2, and a catalytically inactive mutant, C817S, are represented schematically in Fig. 1A. These proteins were purified from E. coli (Fig. 1B). rD1 typically purified as a doublet with both bands detected by anti-CD45 cytoplasmic domain antisera (data not shown), suggesting that the lower band is a proteolytic fragment. Equal molar amounts were assayed for phosphatase activity, and rD1 was found to be catalytically active using the CD3zeta pY83 phosphopeptide as a substrate, although it was about 2-fold less active than rD1/D2 (Fig. 2). Both rD2 and C817S had no detectable activity against this substrate. Kinetic analysis of rD1 and rD1/D2 activity using pNPP and other tyrosine-phosphorylated peptides as substrates indicated that the two-domain phosphatase (rD1/D2) was a 2-3-fold more efficient enzyme than rD1 (Table I). In contrast to this, the rD2 proteins expressing either the membrane-proximal region or the spacer region at the N terminus of the protein did not exhibit any detectable phosphatase activity for any of the substrates listed in Table I. Even when 100× more enzyme (2.6 µM) was assayed for up to 4 h with CD3zeta pY83 or pNPP substrates, no detectable activity was observed. The presence of PTP-D2 in the rD1/D2 protein did not affect the substrate specificity of CD45, at least when tested against the substrates indicated in Table I. rD1 and rD1/D2 were also able to dephosphorylate autophosphorylated recombinant GST-p56lck (Fig. 3). Comparison of the initial rates of dephosphorylation (Fig. 3B) indicated that the recombinant two domain phosphatase, rD1/D2, was again approximately 2-fold more efficient than rD1.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Recombinant murine CD45 cytoplasmic domain proteins. A, schematic representation of the 6-His-tagged CD45 cytoplasmic domain proteins expressed in E. coli (numbered according to Ref. 27). The numbers above construct 1 indicate the first and last residues of the protein and the various domains are named below the construct. MP is the membrane-proximal region, PTP-D1 is the first, N-terminal phosphatase domain, SP is the spacer region, PTP-D2 is the second, C-terminal phosphatase domain, and CT is the carboxy tail. The starred residue in construct 2 represents a point mutation of the catalytic cysteine in PTP-D1, which is altered to a serine, and the numbered residues in 3 and 4 denote the last and first residues, respectively. The deleted residues are indicated in 5. B, SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis of the purified recombinant proteins. The proteins were separated on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and stained with Coomassie Blue. Lanes 1 to 5 are constructs 1 to 5 depicted in A. Molecular mass standards are indicated on the left in kDa.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Phosphatase activity of CD45 cytoplasmic domain proteins. Equal molar concentrations of rD1/D2, rD1, and C817S (23 nM) and 12.5-fold more of rD2 (288 nM) were assayed against a saturating concentration of CD3zeta pY83 phosphopeptide (2 mM) using malachite green to detect release of inorganic phosphate (see "Experimental Procedures"). Readings were taken at 0, 1, and 3 min for rD1/D2 and rD1 and 0, 3, and 20 min for rD2 and C817S (only up to 3-min time point is shown).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Phosphatase activity of recombinant CD45 cytoplasmic domain proteins
rD1/D2 and rD1 were each assayed at 23 nM. Numbers reported ±S.D. were calculated from Eadie-Hofstee plots of the data and were averaged from two to four experiments.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Phosphatase activity of rD1/D2 and rD1 using recombinant GST-p56lck as the substrate. A, 5 µl of 60 nM concentration of rD1/D2 or rD1 were incubated with 5 µl of 55 nM concentration of GST-p56lck fusion protein for the time points indicated. Samples were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, and the relative amount of phosphorylated tyrosine residues remaining in the GST-p56lck was detected by immunoblot analysis using an anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (4G10). Molecular mass standards are indicated on the left in kDa. B, graphical representation of GST-p56lck dephosphorylation by rD1/D2 and rD1. The bands in A were subjected to densitometry scan analysis, and the amount of phosphorylation at time 0 was taken as 100%.

The Presence of Domain 2 Influences the Catalytic Activity and Enzyme Stability of CD45-- To further investigate the differences between the single (rD1) and two-domain CD45 phosphatase (rD1/D2), enzymatic activity was compared at different pHs (Fig. 4). Both rD1 and rD1/D2 showed optimal activity at pH 7.2 using pNPP as the substrate and displayed a similar pattern of activity in the basic pH range. However, in the acidic pH range, between pH 5.5-7.0, rD1/D2 consistently showed a higher level of activity than rD1 alone, indicating that the presence of PTP-D2 creates a more favorable environment for an ionizable group involved in the catalytic reaction. Thermostability of enzyme activity was also assessed by incubating rD1/D2 and rD1 at the indicated temperatures in Fig. 5 for 5 min then assaying equal molar concentrations at 30 °C using pNPP as a substrate. rD1 consistently lost phosphatase activity at lower temperatures than rD1/D2, indicating that it is less thermostable.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   pH optimum of rD1/D2 and rD1. Phosphatase activity was measured using 13.5 mM pNPP as substrate and rD1/D2 and rD1 at equal molar concentrations ranging from 22 to 50 nM (see "Experimental Procedures" for details of buffers used). The data is an average from three to six experiments.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Thermostability of rD1/D2 and rD1. Equal molar concentrations of rD1/D2 and rD1 (233 nM) were incubated at the indicated temperatures for 5 min before phosphatase activity was measured at 30 °C using standard assay conditions with 2.5 mM pNPP as substrate; final enzyme concentration was 6 nM (see "Experimental Procedures"). The data was an average from two experiments. Similar results were obtained when the CD3zeta pY83 phosphopeptide was used as the substrate (data not shown).

rD1/D2 and rD2 Are Primarily Monomers, rD1 Is Primarily a Dimer, and rD2.2 Aggregates in Solution-- The molecular sizes of the native recombinant proteins were estimated by gel filtration (Fig. 6A). Interestingly rD1, but not rD2, eluted at a similar volume to rD1/D2, suggesting that the majority of rD1 was present in a dimeric form, whereas the elution volume of rD2 suggested that it was primarily present as a monomer. rD1 eluted primarily as a single peak at this volume over a concentration range of 1-100 µg/ml, indicating that rD1 is primarily present in a dimeric form, whereas rD1/D2 eluted as a monomer over a similar concentration range. Although rD2 was present as a monomer, rD2.2, containing the membrane-proximal region in place of the spacer region, was present in large aggregates and eluted in the void volume (data not shown).


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Estimates of molecular sizes of rD1/D2, rD1, and rD2. A, a Superose 12 gel filtration column was equilibrated in 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, and 0.025% beta -mercaptoethanol and calibrated with globular protein standards. rD1/D2, rD1, rD2, and rD2.2 were run through the column at a range of concentrations (see "Experimental Procedures"). Shown is the graphical representation of the average elution volumes of the proteins plotted against molecular mass of the standard proteins. rD2.2 eluted in the void volume and is not shown in the figure. B, Coomassie Blue-stained homogeneous 20% native polyacrylamide gel. The protein concentration before loading was approximately 10 µM. rD2.2 was unable to enter the separating gel and is not shown in the figure. Numbers on the right indicate migration of bovine serum albumin (67 kDa) and ovalbumin (44 kDa), included for size reference. C, Coomassie Blue-stained SDS-polyacrylamide gel (PAGE). Numbers (in kDa) represent the position of molecular mass markers.

To further confirm the presence of a dimeric form of rD1 and monomeric forms of rD1/D2 and rD2, the recombinant proteins were electrophoresed on both native and SDS-polyacrylamide gels. On the native gel (Fig. 6B), the majority of rD1/D2 and rD2 migrated to similar positions observed under denaturing, SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis conditions (Fig. 6C). However, under native conditions, rD1 migrated to a similar apparent molecular weight as rD1/D2 (Fig. 6B), consistent with dimer formation, whereas it migrated as a monomer after SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Fig. 6C). Although rD1 migrated primarily as a dimer under native conditions (Fig. 6B), some monomer was detected after Western blot analysis (data not shown). At 1 µg/ml (23 nM), rD1 was demonstrated to be active against tyrosine-phosphorylated peptides, indicating that rD1-rD1 dimer formation does not prevent catalytic activity. However, it was noted that this enzyme was approximately 2-fold less active than rD1/D2, which primarily existed as a monomer.

Evidence for an Intramolecular Interaction in rD1/D2-- The fact that rD1 forms a dimer in solution but rD1/D2 does not suggested that an intramolecular interaction may be occurring in the full-length cytoplasmic domain of CD45 between PTP-D1 and PTP-D2, thus preventing dimerization. This would also help to explain the effect of PTP-D2 on the catalytic activity and stability of PTP-D1 in the rD1/D2 protein. To try and establish whether intramolecular interactions were occurring in rD1/D2, limited trypsin digestion was performed, and the digested products were electrophoresed on both native and SDS-polyacrylamide gels. Fig. 7A shows that with increasing amounts of trypsin, rD1/D2 is digested primarily into two major fragments of approximately 27 and 53 kDa. Interestingly, these tryptic fragments electrophoresed as a single band on the native gel, indicating that both fragments associated with one another (Fig. 7B). Excision of this band from the native gel and subsequent electrophoresis on an SDS-polyacrylamide gel confirmed that both tryptic fragments were present (Fig. 7C). To further localize the regions involved in this interaction, N-terminal sequence was obtained for each tryptic fragment. From the N-terminal sequence, SSNLDE, the 27-kDa fragment was found to begin at residue 573, thus comprising the N-terminal portion of the CD45 cytoplasmic domain estimated to contain the majority of the membrane-proximal region and approximately two-thirds of the first phosphatase domain. The 53-kDa fragment was found to begin at residue 770 with the sequence ATGREV and thus can be estimated to consist of the last third of the first phosphatase domain (including the catalytic cysteine 817), the spacer region, the entire second phosphatase domain, and probably some of the carboxy tail. This indicates the presence of a noncovalent association between the N- and C-terminal regions of the cytoplasmic domain of CD45.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Limited trypsin digestion of rD1/D2. A, Coomassie Blue-stained 10% SDS gel of rD1/D2 digested with increasing amounts of trypsin. Lane 1, rD1/D2 undigested; lane 2, trypsin:rD1/D2 ratio of 1:100 for 1 h; lane 3, 1:50, 1 h; lane 4, 1:25, 1 h; lane 5, 1:25, 2 h; lane 6, 1:25, 3 h; lane 7, 1:10, 4 h. Prestained molecular mass markers are indicated in kDa. B, silver-stained 20% native polyacrylamide gel. Lanes correspond to the same lanes in A, with lane B representing bovine serum albumin run for size reference. C, Coomassie Blue-stained 12.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. Lanes 1 and 4 are the same as previous; 4N has been digested with trypsin and run on a native gel, and the single band was excised and then loaded onto this SDS gel.

To further determine whether this intramolecular interaction involved the regions present in rD2, in vitro binding assays were performed with rD1 and rD2 proteins. rD2 was made as a GST fusion protein (GST-rD2) immobilized to beads, and recombinant 6-His-tagged proteins including rD1 and rD2 were added. As can be seen in Fig. 8, rD1 bound preferentially to immobilized GST-rD2 but not to GST alone or to another GST fusion protein. In addition, only rD1 and not other 6-His-tagged proteins, including rD2, associated with GST-rD2, indicating a specific association. However, only a small percentage (~5%) of rD1 bound to rD2. The reason for this is presently unknown but may reflect the fact that rD1 is already present as a dimer. The identification of a specific interaction between rD1 and rD2 provides further evidence for an intramolecular head to tail interaction occurring within the cytoplasmic domain of CD45.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Binding assay of soluble 6-His proteins to immobilized GST-rD2. 1 µg of each protein was incubated in 50 µl of 20 mM Tris, pH7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, and 0.025% beta -mercaptoethanol for 2 h and washed (see "Experimental Procedures"). A, immobilized GST fusion proteins stained with Coomassie Blue. The first two lanes contain 50 and 100 ng of 6-His rD1, respectively, which are below the level of detection with Coomassie Blue. B, beads alone. The rest of the lanes contain 1 µg of GST fusion protein as indicated. Purified GST-rD2 contained a major proteolytic fragment. Molecular mass standards are indicated on the left in kDa. B, anti-6-His Western blot. The first two lanes indicate the signal obtained from 50 and 100 ng of rD1, respectively. The soluble 6-His proteins added to the immobilized GST proteins indicated in A are shown above the lanes. C is a control, a recombinant 6-His-glucosidase protein.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

This data establishes that PTP-D1 of CD45 does not require the presence of PTP-D2 to be catalytically active. This contradicts our previously published results, which did not detect any phosphatase activity from an in vitro translated and immunoprecipitated rD1 protein (18). Likewise, Streuli et al. (17) detected only 0.1% wild-type activity from a rD1 protein assayed from bacterial cell lysates, and Lorenzo et al. (24) recently found that a recombinant protein expressing CD45 PTP-D1 was not active when its maltose-binding protein fusion partner was cleaved (24). In this present study, several differences were evident, which may help explain why significant levels of activity were observed for the rD1 protein. First, the rD1 protein was produced in large amounts and was isolated and purified away from other potentially inhibitory compounds. Second, the isolation and purification procedure was optimized to minimize exposure to conditions that favor protein unfolding and degradation (see "Experimental Procedures"). Third, assays such as CD spectral analysis were performed, which helped to confirm the structural integrity of the protein (data not shown).

No catalytic activity was detected for rD2 or rD2.2. rD2 was found to be a monomer in solution, whereas rD2.2 was present as a large aggregate. rD2.2 contained the membrane-proximal region of CD45, which may have contributed to this aggregation. Alternatively, the splicing of this region to PTP-D2 may have produced an unstable or misfolded protein, although CD spectral analysis indicated that this molecule possessed a similar secondary structure to that observed in the rD1/D2 protein (data not shown). Under similar purification conditions that produced an active rD1, no detectable activity was observed for rD2, even when tested in a 100-fold excess for several h. Thus we conclude that PTP-D2 is not catalytically active against any of the substrates tested when expressed as a recombinant protein. This result supports previous data obtained from in vitro translated and immunoprecipitated recombinant PTP-D2-containing proteins (18). In addition, the sequence at the predicted catalytic region of CD45 PTP-D2 is lacking an arginine and aspartate residue, two residues that are thought to play a crucial role in the enzymatic reaction (reviewed in Refs. 20-22). Mutation of the presumed catalytic cysteine in PTP-D2 had no effect on the protein-tyrosine phosphatase activity of CD45 in recombinant systems and in the restoration of T cell function by a chimeric epidermal growth factor receptor/CD45 phosphatase (16, 18, 25), again implying that PTP-D2 is not an active phosphatase either as a recombinant protein or when expressed in T cells. However, one group isolated two truncated CD45 proteins lacking different regions of PTP-D1 from eukaryotic cells, which had catalytic activity, and this was attributed to an active PTP-D2 (26). In this study we have demonstrated that in the absence of any PTP-D1 sequence, two purified recombinant PTP-D2 proteins were not catalytically active against any of the substrates tested.

This present work establishes that CD45 is similar to other two domain phosphatases such as LAR, RPTPalpha , and RPTPµ, where PTP-D1 has been shown to be independently catalytically active (15, 17, 19). With the exception of LAR (17, 33), optimal catalytic activity was observed with these phosphatases when both PTP-D1 and PTP-D2 were present. Like CD45, no catalytic activity has been observed for the second domain of these phosphatases, except for RPTPalpha , where the observed catalytic activity for PTP-D2 was much lower than that observed with PTP-D1 (15). In other two domain phosphatases, PTP-D2 lacks key residues thought to be crucial for catalytic activity, making it very unlikely that these domains would be active phosphatases (reviewed in Refs. 20-22). Thus the second phosphatase domain in two-domain phosphatases has been shown to have little or no activity in comparison to their first phosphatase domain, and in many cases these domains are required for optimal activity of the first domain.

It has been suggested that PTP-D2 or phosphorylation of PTP-D2 can alter the substrate specificity of CD45 against certain artificial substrates (17, 34). In this study, using pNPP, a variety of peptide substrates, and the protein substrate GST-p56lck, no evidence was obtained for a major role of PTP-D2 in influencing substrate specificity. Comparison of rD1 and rD1/D2 activities indicated that PTP-D2 is required for optimal enzymatic stability and optimal activity of the first phosphatase domain of CD45. The fact that the presence of PTP-D2 influences catalytic activity at acidic pH suggests that PTP-D2 can influence the catalytic environment of PTP-D1. Whether PTP-D2 is acting directly to modify the catalytic environment or indirectly by altering the conformation of PTP-D1 is not known. However, this and data indicating an interaction between rD1 and rD2 suggests that PTP-D1 and PTP-D2 may be in close proximity to one another.

Crystal structures of the first phosphatase domains of two transmembrane two-domain tyrosine phosphatases, RPTPalpha and RPTPµ, have been determined (14, 35). Although both crystallized as dimers, it was suggested that dimerization of the RPTPµ rD1 was an artifact of crystallization, as gel filtration indicated that the protein was a monomer in solution up to concentrations of 7.5 mg/ml (35). Dimers of RPTPalpha rD1 were formed by the membrane-proximal region of one rD1 molecule forming a "wedge" and binding to the active-site region of the second, an interaction that was predicted to block phosphatase activity. Dimers and higher oligomer formation occurred for RPTPalpha rD1 at concentrations between 0.1 and 5 mg/ml but did not occur for the rD2 protein (14). However, kinetic analysis of rD1 of RPTPalpha at lower concentrations was consistent with it being active as a monomer in solution (36). In this study, CD45 rD1 existed primarily as a dimer at the concentrations tested (1-100 µg/ml), whereas the two-domain phosphatase, rD1/D2, existed primarily as a monomer (5-1000 µg/ml). This suggests that the presence of PTP-D2 in the molecule prevents its dimerization. Contrary to the prediction from RPTPalpha studies (14), dimer formation of CD45 rD1 did not result in an inactive phosphatase; however, it was 2-3-fold less active than rD1/D2, raising the possibility that dimer formation may down-regulate activity. However, we cannot easily assess whether one or both of the phosphatase domains are active in the rD1-rD1 dimer.

Attempts to define the regions responsible for a potential intramolecular interaction in rD1/D2 identified a 27-kDa fragment containing the N-terminal region (the membrane-proximal region and two-thirds of PTP-D1) interacting with a 53-kDa fragment containing the C-terminal region (the last third of PTP-D1, the spacer region, PTP-D2, and the carboxy tail) after limited trypsin digestion. This 53-kDa tryptic fragment is the same fragment identified and purified by Tan et al. (26) who concluded that the catalytic activity was derived from PTP-D2. However, in these studies, we found this tryptic fragment noncovalently associated with a 27-kDa fragment derived from PTP-D1 and, despite finding no activity associated with rD2 proteins, found this complex to be catalytically active (data not shown).

Evidence for a noncovalent intramolecular interaction from tryptic digestion studies and for a rD1-rD2 association suggests an interaction between the N-terminal part of the protein containing PTP-D1 and the C-terminal part containing PTP-D2. It is tempting to speculate that in the rD1/D2 protein, the membrane-proximal region interacts with PTP-D2 to promote the intramolecular interaction and prevent intermolecular dimer formation, resulting in rD1/D2 monomers. In the absence of PTP-D2, the membrane-proximal region of rD1 may interact with another rD1 molecule, thereby promoting dimer formation. Thus, PTP-D2 may act to prevent dimerization. Regulation of this membrane-proximal region-PTP-D2 interaction would result in the formation of intra- or intermolecular interactions, which may act to regulate CD45 function. Consistent with this model is data from CD45-negative T cells expressing an epidermal growth factor receptor-CD45 chimera. Here, epidermal growth factor addition and presumed dimerization of the epidermal growth factor receptor-CD45 chimera interferes with its function in T cell activation (13). Interestingly, recent work suggests that a specific residue within the membrane-proximal region is required to mediate this effect (37). Although this model is consistent with current data, it remains to be proven, and attempts to generate an rD1 protein lacking the membrane-proximal region to directly assess its role in dimerization have not yet generated a stable protein.

It is becoming evident that interactions between different regions within a single protein can occur as a form of regulation. Examples of this can be found in the src family protein-tyrosine kinases, where two recent crystal structures demonstrate complex intramolecular interactions between the SH3 domain and a linker region as well as the SH2 domain near the N terminus with a regulatory phosphotyrosine residue close to the C terminus (38, 39). Such an interaction results in a closed, inactive conformation that can be converted to an open, active conformation upon dephosphorylation of the regulatory tyrosine (reviewed in Ref. 40). Likewise, the recent determination of the crystal structure of SHP-2 confirms that an intramolecular interaction occurs between the N-terminal SH2 domain and the C-terminal PTP domain (41). Release of this intramolecular interaction is thought to occur upon occupation of the SH2 domains, leading to a more active, open conformation (42-44). Furthermore, intramolecular regulation may also occur for T cell-PTP, where the noncatalytic C-terminal domain of T cell-PTP has been shown to affect its phosphatase activity (45). We now provide initial evidence for intra- and intermolecular interactions occurring in the cytoplasmic domain of CD45, raising the possibility that CD45 activity may also be regulated by intramolecular interactions mediated by the C-terminal region containing the second phosphatase domain, PTP-D2.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. F. Jirik and Dr. I. Clark-Lewis for providing the tyrosine-phosphorylated peptides, Dr. M. Matsuda and R. Ingham for GST-Crk-SH3 protein, G. Doheny for 6-His-glucosidase protein, and D. Ng for critical reading of the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by funds from the Medical Research Council of Canada.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Studentship.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Microbiology and Immunology, 300-6174 University Blvd, Vancouver, B. C., V6T 1Z3, Canada. Tel.: 604-822-8980; Fax: 604-822-6041; E-mail: pauline{at}unixg.ubc.ca.

1 The abbreviations used are: PTP, protein-tyrosine phosphatase; GST, glutathione S-transferase; pNPP; para-nitrophenyl phosphate; rD1/D2, recombinant 6-His-tagged CD45 cytoplasmic domain protein; rD1, recombinant 6-His-tagged CD45 protein containing the membrane-proximal region, the first phosphatase domain, and the spacer region; rD2, recombinant 6-His-tagged CD45 protein containing part of the spacer region, the second phosphatase domain, and the carboxy tail; rD2.2, recombinant 6-His-tagged CD45 protein containing the membrane-proximal region, the second phosphatase domain, and the carboxy tail; PTP-D1, the first phosphatase domain; PTP-D2, the second phosphatase domain; RPTP, receptor-like protein-tyrosine phosphatase; CD, circular dichroism; NTA, nitrilotriacetic acid.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Trowbridge, I. S., and Thomas, M. L. (1994) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 12, 85-116[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Johnson, P., Maiti, A., and Ng, D. H. W. (1997) in Weir's Handbook of Experimental Immunology (Herzenberg, L. A., Weir, D. M., Herzenberg, L. A., and Blackwell, C., eds), 5th Ed., Vol. II, pp. 62.1-62.16, Blackwell Science Inc., Malden, MA
  3. Ostergaard, H. L., Shackelford, D. A., Hurley, T. R., Johnson, P., Hyman, R., Sefton, B. M., and Trowbridge, I. S. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 8959-8963[Abstract]
  4. Mustelin, T., Coggeshall, K. M., and Altman, A. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 6302-6306[Abstract]
  5. Mustelin, T., and Altman, A. (1990) Oncogene 5, 809-813[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Mustelin, T., Pessa-Morikawa, T., Autero, M., Gassmann, M., Andersson, L. C., Gahmberg, C. G., and Burn, P. (1992) Eur. J. Immunol. 22, 1173-1178[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Shiroo, M., Goff, L., Biffen, M., Shivnan, E., and Alexander, D. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 4887-4897[Abstract]
  8. Autero, M., Saharinen, J., Pessa-Morikawa, T., Soula-Rothhut, M., Oetken, C., Gassmann, M., Bergman, M., Alitalo, K., Burn, P., Gahmberg, C. G., and Mustelin, T. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 1308-1321[Abstract]
  9. Ng, D. H. W., Watts, J. D., Aebersold, R., and Johnson, P. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 1295-1300[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Schraven, B., Kirchgessner, H., Gaber, B., Samstag, Y., and Meuer, S. (1991) Eur. J. Immunol. 21, 2469-2477[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Koretzky, G. A., Kohmetscher, M., and Ross, S. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 8958-8964[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Takeda, A., Wu, J. J., and Maizel, A. L. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 16651-16659[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Desai, D. M., Sap, J., Schlessinger, J., and Weiss, A. (1993) Cell 73, 541-554[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Bilwes, A. M., den Hertog, J., Hunter, T., and Noel, J. P. (1996) Nature 382, 555-559[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Wang, Y., and Pallen, C. J. (1991) EMBO J. 10, 3231-3237[Abstract]
  16. Streuli, M., Krueger, N. X., Tsai, A. Y. M., and Saito, H. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 8698-8702[Abstract]
  17. Streuli, M., Krueger, N. X., Thai, T., Tang, M., and Saito, H. (1990) EMBO J. 9, 2399-2407[Abstract]
  18. Johnson, P., Ostergaard, H. L., Wasden, C., and Trowbridge, I. S. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 8035-8041[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Gebbink, M. F. B. G., Verheijen, M. H. G., Zondag, G. C. M., van Etten, I., and Moolenaar, W. H. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 13516-13522[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Barford, D., Jia, Z., and Tonks, N. K. (1995) Nat. Struct. Biol. 2, 1043-1053[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Denu, J. M., Stuckey, J. A., Saper, M. A., and Dixon, J. E. (1996) Cell 87, 361-364[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Fauman, E. B., and Saper, M. A. (1996) Trends Biochem. Sci. 21, 413-417[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Iida, N., Lokeshwar, V. B., and Bourguignon, L. Y. W. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 28576-28583[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Lorenzo, H. K., Farber, D., Germain, V., Acuto, O., and Alzari, P. M. (1997) FEBS Lett. 411, 231-235[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Desai, D. M., Sap, J., Silvennoinen, O., Schlessinger, J., and Weiss, A. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 4002-4010[Abstract]
  26. Tan, X., Stover, D. R., and Walsh, K. A. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 6835-6838[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Thomas, M. L., Reynolds, P. J., Chain, A., Ben-Neriah, Y., and Trowbridge, I. S. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 5360-5363[Abstract]
  28. Ng, D. H. W., Maiti, A., and Johnson, P. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 206, 302-309[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Studier, F. W., Rosenberg, A. H., Dunn, J. J., and Dubendorff, J. W. (1990) Methods Enzymol. 185, 60-89[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Yasukawa, T., Kanei-Ishii, C., Maekawa, T., Fujimoto, J., Yamamoto, T., and Ishii, S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 25328-25331[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Ng, D. H. W., Harder, K. W., Clark-Lewis, I., Jirik, F., and Johnson, P. (1995) J. Immunol. Methods 179, 177-185[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Ng, D. H. W., Jabali, M. D., Maiti, A., Borodchak, P., Harder, K., Brocker, T., Malissen, B., Jirik, F. R., and Johnson, P. (1997) Biochem. J. 327, 867-876[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Itoh, M., Streuli, M., Krueger, N. X., and Saito, H. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 12356-12363[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Stover, D. R., and Walsh, K. A. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 5523-5532[Abstract]
  35. Hoffmann, K. M. V., Tonks, N. K., and Barford, D. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 27505-27508[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Wu, L., Buist, A., den Hertog, J., and Zhang, Z.-Y. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 6994-7002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Majeti, R., Bilwes, A. M., Noel, J. P., Hunter, T., and Weiss, A. (1998) Science 279, 88-91[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Xu, W., Harrison, S. C., and Eck, M. J. (1997) Nature 385, 595-602[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Sicheri, F., Moarefi, I., and Kuriyan, J. (1997) Nature 385, 602-609[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Brown, M. T., and Cooper, J. A. (1996) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1287, 121-149[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Hof, P., Pluskey, S., Dhe-Paganon, S., Eck, M. J., and Shoelson, S. E. (1998) Cell 92, 441-450[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Dechert, U., Adam, M., Harder, K. W., Clark-Lewis, I., and Jirik, F. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 5602-5611[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Pei, D., Lorenz, U., Klingmuller, U., Neel, B. G., and Walsh, C. T. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 15483-15493[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Pluskey, S., Wandless, T. J., Walsh, C. T., and Shoelson, S. E. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 2897-2900[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Hao, L., Tiganis, T., Tonks, N. K., and Charbonneau, H. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 29322-29329[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.