Three High Mobility Group-like Sequences within a 48-Base Pair Enhancer of the Col2a1 Gene Are Required for Cartilage-specific Expression in Vivo*

Guang ZhouDagger , Véronique Lefebvre§, Zhaoping Zhang, Heidi Eberspaecher, and Benoit de Crombrugghe

From the Department of Molecular Genetics, the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

To understand the molecular mechanisms by which mesenchymal cells differentiate into chondrocytes, we have used the gene for an early and abundant marker of chondrocytes, the mouse pro-alpha 1(II) collagen gene (Col2a1), to delineate a minimal sequence needed for chondrocyte-specific expression and to identify the DNA-binding proteins that mediate its activity. We show here that a 48-base pair (bp) Col2a1 intron 1 sequence specifically targets the activity of a heterologous promoter to chondrocytes in transgenic mice. Mutagenesis studies of this 48-bp element identified three separate sites (sites 1-3) that were essential for its chondrocyte-specific enhancer activity in both transgenic mice and transient transfections. Mutations in sites 1 and 2 also severely inhibited the chondrocyte-specific enhancer activity of a 468-bp Col2a1 intron 1 sequence in vivo. SOX9, an SRY-related high mobility group (HMG) domain transcription factor, was previously shown to bind site 3, to bend the 48-bp DNA at this site, and to strongly activate this 48-bp enhancer as well as larger Col2a1 enhancer elements. All three sites correspond to imperfect binding sites for HMG domain proteins and appear to be involved in the formation of a large chondrocyte-specific complex between the 48-bp element, Sox9, and other protein(s). Indeed, mutations in each of the three HMG-like sites of the 48-bp element, which abolished chondrocyte-specific expression of reporter genes in transgenic mice and in transiently transfected cells, inhibited formation of this complex. Overall our results suggest a model whereby both Sox9 and these other proteins bind to several HMG-like sites in the Col2a1 gene to cooperatively control its expression in cartilage.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Acquisition of the chondrocytic phenotype occurs along a major pathway of differentiation of mesenchymal cells (1, 2). With the goal of identifying transcription factors that control chondrocyte-specific gene expression, we used the gene for collagen type II (Col2a1),1 an early and abundant marker of chondrocytes (3-5), to delineate minimal sequences in this gene that control chondrocyte-specific expression in transgenic mice. Elucidation of the transcriptional mechanisms that control the chondrocyte-specific expression of the Col2a1 gene should provide important insights into the molecular specifications of chondrocytes.

We previously identified a 48-bp element in intron 1 of the mouse Col2a1 gene that, when present as four tandem copies, conferred chondrocyte-specific expression both in transgenic mice and in transient expression experiments in tissue culture cells (6). A multimerized 18-bp element located at the 3' end of the 48-bp sequence also acted as a powerful chondrocyte-specific enhancer in transient transfection assays of rat chondrosarcoma (RCS) cells and mouse primary chondrocytes but not of fibroblasts (6).

SOX9 is a member of a family of transcription factors with a DNA-binding domain that shows more than 50% similarity with the high mobility group HMG DNA-binding domain of SRY, the testis-determining factor in mammals (7-12). Recently, heterozygous mutations in human SOX9 have been identified as a cause of campomelic dysplasia (CD), a severe dwarfism syndrome in which essentially all skeletal elements derived from cartilages are affected (13-17). A large proportion of genotypically male (XY) CD patients carrying mutations in SOX9 also show sex reversal. In situ hybridization during mouse embryogenesis showed that Sox9 is expressed in all chondroprogenitor cells; Sox9 expression generally parallels that of Col2a1 even in some non-chondrocytic cells and increases together with that of Col2a1 when frank chondrocyte differentiation takes place (5, 18, 19). The expression of Sox9 in gonadal ridges and later in the Sertoli cells of the testis presumably accounts for the sex reversal in CD patients (20, 21). Overall, the abnormal skeletal manifestations of CD patients and the pattern of expression of Sox9 during embryonic development suggest that Sox9 plays an important role in the pathway of chondrocyte differentiation.

Recent experiments showed that the 48-bp Col2a1 element that confers chondrocyte specificity in transgenic mice is a direct target for Sox9. Indeed, Sox9 was able to bind to a sequence in this element that is essential for chondrocyte-specific enhancer activity, and SOX9 activated this element in cotransfection experiments of nonchondrocytic cells (22). In addition, ectopic expression of SOX9 in transgenic mouse embryos resulted in the activation of the endogenous Col2a1 gene in some but not all areas of ectopic SOX9 expression (23).

Although four tandem copies of the 48-bp Col2a1 sequence and 12 tandem copies of an 18-bp element within this 48-bp sequence both acted as strong chondrocyte-specific enhancers in transient expression experiments, 12 tandem copies of the 18-bp element showed much weaker activity in cartilages of the transgenic mice than did the four tandem copies of the 48-bp enhancer (6). Expression of the reporter gene in embryos harboring the multimerized 18-bp construct was also detected at low levels in skin and brain (6). Therefore, to confer high level chondrocyte-specific reporter gene expression in vivo, the entire 48-bp Col2a1 intronic fragment appeared to be needed.

Although the 18-bp enhancer sequence included the SOX9-binding site of the 48-bp Col2a1 enhancer and was a strong target for SOX9 in transfection experiments (22), the above-mentioned transgenic mice results were consistent with the hypothesis that, to confer chondrocyte specificity in vivo, proteins other than Sox9 might be needed that interact with the 48-bp but not with the 18-bp enhancer sequence. The expression of Sox9 at high levels in Sertoli cells also favors the hypothesis that additional proteins are needed to differentiate the phenotype of chondrocytes from that of Sertoli cells (20, 21). Hence, the purpose of the present study was to further identify sequences in the Col2a1 48-bp enhancer essential for its chondrocyte-specific activity and to determine whether chondrocyte-specific nuclear proteins bound to these sequences. Our results indicate that the 48-bp sequence in Col2a1 contains multiple cis-acting elements essential for chondrocyte-specific expression in vivo and that chondrocytes contain specific nuclear protein(s) in addition to SOX9 that bind to these cis-acting elements and might therefore be involved in chondrocyte-specific enhancer activity.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Cell Cultures-- All cell types were obtained as described previously and cultured under standard conditions (6, 24).

DNA Constructs-- To generate i(8 × 48)pgloblacZ, eight tandem copies of the 48-bp enhancer Col2a1 element were cloned upstream of a minimal human beta -globin promoter (-44 to +28) in the reporter plasmid placF, as described previously for other constructs (25).

The 48-bp mutant intron 1 fragments (see Fig. 4A) were synthesized as double-stranded oligonucleotides containing BamHI- and BglII-cleaved sites at the 5' and 3' ends, respectively. These oligonucleotides were cloned and multimerized in tandem as described previously for the wild-type 48-bp construct (6). Tetramers were cloned in either the p309Col2a1-beta geo vector or the p89Col2a1-luc vector as described previously (6). The p309Col2a1-beta geo vector contained a 309-bp Col2a1 promoter and the SA-beta geo-bpA cassette (25). The mutant 468-bp Col2a1 intron 1 fragment (+1878 to +2345) was generated by polymerase chain reaction and cloned in the p309Col2a1-beta geo vector as described for the wild-type element (25). The sequences of all DNA fragments generated either with oligonucleotides or by polymerase chain reaction were verified by DNA sequencing.

Transient Expression Experiments-- DNA transfections were performed by the modified DNA-calcium phosphate coprecipitation method (26). Monolayers of RCS cells pre-established in 20-cm2 dishes were cotransfected with 7.5 µg of luciferase reporter plasmids and 2.5 µg of pSV2beta gal plasmid used as an internal control for transfection efficiency. Cell extracts were prepared 40-48 h after the start of transfection, and luciferase and beta -galactosidase activities were assayed as described (6).

Generation and Characterization of Transgenic Mice-- Transgenic mice were generated as described (25). Transgenic founder embryos were sacrificed at 14.5 days postcoitum (dpc). Southern blot analysis, staining with X-gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-beta -D-galactopyranoside), and histological analysis were performed as described previously (25).

Synthesis of SOX9 in Vitro and Preparation of Nuclear Extracts-- SOX9 protein was synthesized by in vitro transcription-translation from a previously described SOX9-pcDNA-5'-UT expression vector (22) using the Single-tube Protein System 2 from Novagen, Inc. (Madison, WI). Nuclear extracts from all cell types were prepared as described previously (6) in buffers containing 10 µg/ml leupeptin and pepstatin.

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSAs)-- The wild-type and mutant 48-bp Col2a1 double-stranded oligonucleotides were prepared as described above under "DNA Constructs." Berenil and distamycin were purchased from Sigma. The OCT and HMG probes were prepared as described previously (6, 22). All probes were end-labeled with [alpha -32P]dGTP or [alpha -32P]dCTP using the Klenow fragment. Protein-DNA binding reactions were carried out as described previously (6). Assays with nuclear extracts were performed with 10 µg of protein and 2 µg of poly(dG-dC)·poly(dG-dC). SOX9 synthesized in vitro was assayed in the presence of 0.1 µg of poly(dG-dC)·poly(dG-dC). Supershift experiments were performed with purified SOX9 antibodies as described previously (22).

Elution of CSEP from Electrophoresis Gels-- RCS cell nuclear extracts were partially purified by passage through a DNA affinity column containing an R2 oligonucleotide containing an 18-bp Col2a1 enhancer sequence (6). The flow-through, which contained CSEP activity, was concentrated 10 times by precipitation with ammonium sulfate (60% saturation) and then subjected to 7.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) under reducing conditions. Protein elution from gel slices and renaturation were performed as described (6); 10-µl eluates were used in EMSA.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Chondrocyte-specific Targeting by a 48-bp Col2a1 Element in Transgenic Mice-- We showed previously that a 48-bp sequence of intron 1 in the Col2a1 gene together with a 309-bp Col2a1 promoter conferred strict chondrocyte-specific expression in transgenic mice (6). To investigate further whether the 48-bp Col2a1 sequence by itself contained all the cis-acting elements needed for chondrocyte-specific enhancer activity in intact mouse embryos, we generated a transgene i(8 × 48)pgloblacZ in which eight tandem repeats of the 48-bp enhancer fragment were cloned upstream of a minimal human beta -globin promoter (Fig. 1A). Two of the five transgenic 14.5-dpc founder embryos harboring i(8 × 48)pgloblacZ stained positive for X-gal, a chromogenic substrate for beta -galactosidase, whereas the other three did not. Moreover, the X-gal-positive embryos harboring i(8 × 48)pgloblacZ exhibited cartilage-specific staining similar to that seen at the same developmental stage (Fig. 1B) in embryos harboring transgene p309i(4 × 48)Col2a1, in which the same 48-bp fragment was driving a 309-bp Col2a1 promoter (Fig. 6B). X-Gal staining was observed in the cartilages of the head, scapula, vertebrae, ribs, limbs, and shoulder and pelvic girdles. Histological analysis showed that X-gal staining was present in chondrocytes only; no promiscuous X-gal staining was detected in any nonchondrogenic tissues (examples are shown in Fig. 1, C and D). Hence, these experiments demonstrated that in transgenic embryos the sequence of the 48-bp Col2a1 intron 1 element contained the essential elements required to target the activity of a minimal heterologous promoter specifically to chondrocytes.


View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Cartilage-specific beta -galactosidase expression in embryos harboring a transgene containing the 48-bp intron 1 enhancer fragment of Col2a1 and a heterologous promoter. A, schematic representation of i(8 × 48)pgloblacZ, in which eight tandem copies of the 48-bp Col2a1 element were cloned upstream of a minimal human beta -globin promoter. B, a 14.5-dpc whole mount X-gal-stained transgenic embryo carrying i(8 × 48)pgloblacZ. The staining pattern is very similar to that for the stage-matched transgenic embryo carrying p309i(4 × 48)Col2a1 shown in Fig. 6B. C and D, sagittal sections of the embryo shown in B. me, Meckel's cartilage.

Formation of a Chondrocyte-specific Complex with the 48-Base Pair Col2a1 Enhancer Element-- In previous EMSA experiments, an 18-bp Col2a1 enhancer probe was used to identify Sox9 and other chondrocyte-enriched proteins in nuclear extracts of primary chondrocytes and RCS cells (6, 22). Since the 48-bp Col2a1 element, which includes the 18-bp sequence, confers a much stricter chondrocyte specificity in transgenic embryos than does the 18-bp element, the 48-bp Col2a1 element was used as a probe in EMSA experiments to (a) identify in chondrocytes unique nuclear factors that would specifically bind to the 48-bp enhancer and (b) locate the DNA-binding sites for these factors.

Formation of a major complex with the 48-bp enhancer probe was observed in reactions using extracts from primary chondrocytes and from two chondrocytic cell lines (MC615 and RCS cells) (Fig. 2). This complex was absent in reactions with extracts from fibroblastic cell lines (10T1/2 and Balb/3T3) and all other nonchondrogenic cell lines tested. The protein (or proteins) forming the major complex was tentatively named CSEP for chondrocyte-specific enhancer-binding proteins.


View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Identification of chondrocyte-specific protein(s) binding to the 48-bp Col2a1 element. EMSA was performed using the 48-bp probe and nuclear extracts from the following cell types: primary mouse rib chondrocytes (Pr.Ch.); MC615 mouse immortalized chondrocytes; RCS cells; 10T1/2 mouse embryo fibroblasts; ROS 17/2.8 rat osteosarcoma cells; C2C12 and C2C7 mouse skeletal myoblasts; subline 714 of BALB/3T3 mouse embryo fibroblasts; EL4 mouse lymphoma T-type cells; Raji human lymphoblast-like cells; S194 mouse myeloma cells; NMuLi mouse normal liver cells; RAG mouse renal adenocarcinoma cells; and Hep3B human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Arrowhead, chondrocyte-specific CSEP·48-bp DNA complex.

Interestingly, SOX9 synthesized in vitro formed a major complex with the 48-bp probe (Fig. 3A, lane 1) whose mobility was similar to that of the complex formed between the 18-bp probe and Sox9 present in crude chondrocyte extracts (22), yet no complex with a similar mobility could be seen when the same chondrocyte extracts were incubated with the 48-bp probe under similar EMSA conditions (Fig. 3A, lane 2). The CSEP·DNA complex migrated more slowly than the major complex formed between SOX9 made in vitro and the 48-bp probe; a second complex that often formed between SOX9 synthesized in vitro and the 48-bp probe migrated at the trailing edge of the CSEP·DNA complex. To test whether Sox9 was part of the CSEP complex, we performed supershift experiments with SOX9 antibodies (22). These antibodies were able to completely supershift the major complexes and the second complexes formed between the 48-bp probe and SOX9 made in vitro (data not shown) as well as the complex between the 18-bp probe and Sox9 present in RCS cell nuclear extracts (22). When chondrocyte nuclear extracts were incubated with the 48-bp probe, we observed the formation of a supershift complex with SOX9 antibodies, but despite extensive efforts, the CSEP·DNA complex was always either unaffected or only slightly weaker than in control reactions without antibodies (Fig. 3A, lanes 3 and 4). We concluded that Sox9 could be part of the CSEP complex and hypothesized that CSEP might contain one or more other proteins.


View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Characterization of the CSEP·48-bp DNA complex. A, the CSEP·48-bp DNA complex had a mobility different from that of the SOX9·48-bp DNA complexes and was only partially supershifted by SOX9 antibody. EMSAs were performed with the 48-bp probe and RCS nuclear extracts (lanes 2-4) or SOX9 synthesized in vitro (lane 1). The RCS extracts were preincubated with SOX9 antibody (lane 4). SOX9 synthesized in vitro formed two complexes with DNA: one migrated faster than the CSEP·DNA complex formed with RCS extracts (large arrowhead), and the other migrated at the trailing edge of the CSEP·DNA complex (small arrowhead). Arrow, Sox9·DNA complex supershifted by SOX9 antibody. B, the minor groove binding drugs inhibited binding of CSEP to DNA. EMSA was performed with RCS extracts and the 48-bp Col2a1 enhancer probe. The minor groove binding drugs distamycin (DIS) and berenil (BER) were added to the final concentrations indicated. -, no drug added. C, binding of CSEP to the 48-bp Col2a1 probe is competed by an HMG oligonucleotide. In EMSAs with RCS extracts and the 48-bp labeled probe, 0- (-) to 300-fold excesses of unlabeled 48-bp Col2a1, OCT, or HMG oligonucleotides were added. D, chondrocyte-specific proteins formed a complex with the HMG probe that had the same mobility as the CSEP·48-bp DNA complex. Lane 1, EMSA with the 48-bp probe and RCS extracts showing CSEP·DNA complex. Lanes 2-11, EMSA with the HMG probe and nuclear extracts from primary mouse rib chondrocytes (Pr.Ch., lanes 2 and 3), RCS cells (lanes 4 and 5), MC615 mouse chondrocytes (lanes 6 and 7), 10T1/2 fibroblasts (lanes 8 and 9), and BALB/3T3 fibroblasts (lanes 10 and 11). The presence (+) or absence (-) of SOX9 antibody is indicated. 1, chondrocyte-specific protein(s)·DNA complex; 2, Sox9·DNA complex; arrow, supershifted SOX9·DNA complex. E, CSEP was found to be made of one and perhaps more polypeptide(s) with an apparent Mr of 75,000-95,000. SDS-PAGE was performed with partially purified RCS cell nuclear extracts; protein was eluted from 16 gel slices schematically shown at left (the molecular weight of protein standards is indicated), renatured, and tested in EMSA with the 48-bp probe. Crude nuclear extracts from RCS cells were used as the EMSA standard.

Efficient formation of a complex between CSEP and the 48-bp probe was seen in EMSA in which poly(dG-dC) was used as nonspecific competitor but not when poly(dA-dT) or poly(dI-dC) was used (data not shown). Since poly(dI-dC) mimics A-T pairs in the minor but not the major groove of DNA (27, 28), these data suggested that CSEP might interact with A-T pairs in the minor groove of the 48-bp probe. In support of this possibility, two A-T pair-selective minor groove DNA ligands distamycin or berenil (diminazene aceturate) (29, 30) inhibited CSEP binding to the 48-bp probe at concentrations as low as 1 µM (Fig. 3B). In control experiments (data not shown), concentrations of 1 µM distamycin and berenil had no effect on the binding to the 18-bp Col2a1 enhancer element of three POU-domain proteins (Oct-1, Brain-1, and Brain-2) previously identified in RCS cell nuclear extracts (6, 22) and known to bind DNA mainly in the major groove (31).

HMG domain proteins are known to contact A-T pairs in the minor groove of the DNA helix, and their binding to DNA can be blocked by distamycin and berenil (29, 30). This suggested, therefore, that the CSEP complex could involve HMG-like proteins. To test this hypothesis, we performed EMSA competition experiments between the 48-bp enhancer probe and an oligonucleotide containing a consensus heptamer-binding site for HMG domain proteins (HMG oligonucleotides) (22, 32). The HMG oligonucleotide competed about 10 times more efficiently than did the 48-bp element for the formation of a complex with CSEP (Fig. 3C). In a control experiment, a 300-fold excess of a consensus octamer-binding site for POU domain proteins (6) failed to compete with the labeled 48-bp probe for the formation of a complex with CSEP.

To test whether other HMG-like proteins, in addition to Sox9, could be involved in CSEP·48-bp probe complex formation, we performed direct binding assays with the HMG probe (Fig. 3D, lanes 2-11). Several complexes were formed by incubating the HMG probe with nuclear extracts from primary chondrocytes. Interestingly, complex 1 had a mobility similar to that of the CSEP·48-bp probe complex and as the CSEP·48-bp complex was formed with extracts from primary chondrocytes and the chondrocytic RCS and MC615 cells but not with extracts from the fibroblastic 10T1/2 and Balb/3T3 cells. This complex was not affected by addition of SOX9 antibodies. Complementary experiments indicated that 100-fold excess amount of the 48-bp probe could compete successfully with the HMG probe for the formation of complex 1 (data not shown). Complex 2 appeared to correspond to Sox9, as demonstrated by supershifting with specific antibodies and by formation of this complex with extracts from cells that express Sox9, i.e. chondrocytic cells (lanes 2-7) and 10T1/2 cells (lanes 8 and 9). Hence, these data suggested the hypothesis that CSEP·48-bp complex might involve a protein that has the ability to bind to an HMG oligonucleotide independently of Sox9.

To test this hypothesis further, proteins were eluted from gel slices after SDS-PAGE of RCS cell nuclear extracts. In EMSA experiments, eluates containing proteins with an apparent Mr of 75,000-95,000 formed a complex with the same mobility as the CSEP·48-bp complex (Fig. 3E); formation of this complex was inhibited by poly(dI-dC) but not poly(dG-dC). These 75-95-kDa proteins also formed a complex with the HMG probe that had the same mobility as complex 1 in Fig. 3D (data not shown). The complex formed between these 75-95-kDa proteins and the 48-bp DNA could not be supershifted with SOX9 antibodies, a result in agreement with our previous Western blot experiments in which Sox9 was detected as a unique polypeptide species with an apparent Mr of about 68,000 in SDS-PAGE (22). These data therefore strongly supported the notion that chondrocytes express a protein or proteins distinct from SOX9 that bind specifically to the Col2a1 48-bp enhancer.

The 48-bp Col2a1 enhancer element contains several sequences that are homologous to the heptamer consensus binding site for HMG domain proteins, i.e. C(A/T)TTG(A/T)(A/T) (11, 33-37). Two of these sequences are located on the upper strand of DNA and will from now on be referred to as site 1 (CTCTGTA) and site 3 (CATTCAT), respectively; another is located on the lower strand of DNA and will be referred to as site 2 (CTTTTCT) (Fig. 4A, wild-type sequence). To determine whether CSEP binds to these HMG-like sites, oligonucleotide probes with mutations in these sites were generated (Fig. 4A, MA1 to MA8) and tested in EMSAs. Formation of the CSEP·DNA complex was decreased when mutant probes which disrupted any one of these sites (MA1, MA2, MA4, MA5, and MA6) were used (Fig. 4B). When MA8 (which harbored mutations in all three sites) was used, formation of the CSEP·DNA complex was essentially abolished. When MA3 (which retained five of the seven nucleotides of the consensus HMG site in site 2) was used, formation of the CSEP·DNA complex was decreased to a lesser degree than when MA2, MA4, or MA5 (which retained only three of seven nucleotides of the HMG consensus site in site 2) was used. Interestingly, formation of the CSEP·DNA complex was strongly enhanced by using mutant MA7, in which site 3 corresponded to a consensus HMG site. Hence, these experiments indicated that binding of CSEP to the 48-bp sequence involved all three HMG-like sites.


View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Binding of CSEP and SOX9 to mutant 48-bp elements. A, sequences of oligonucleotide probes used in EMSA. Only the upper strand is shown with three HMG-like protein binding sites underlined. In the sequences of the mutant 48-bp probes, mutated nucleotides are in lowercase, and identical nucleotides are shown as dots. B, EMSA with wild-type and mutant 48-bp probes and nuclear extracts from RCS cells. C, EMSA with wild-type or mutant 48-bp probes and SOX9 synthesized in vitro. Blank, EMSA was performed with products of in vitro transcription-translation reactions carried out using an empty plasmid. Arrow, SOX9·DNA complex; *, complex formed with proteins from reticulocyte lysate.

Our previous experiments showed that SOX9 binds to site 3 and produces a strong bend in the 48-bp DNA at this site (22). Therefore we asked whether the different mutations in the 48-bp element affected binding of SOX9 (Fig. 4C). As expected, mutation MA6, which disrupted site 3, abolished binding of SOX9 to the 48-bp probe; mutation MA7, which generated a perfect HMG site at site 3 and increased formation of the CSEP·DNA complex, had no significant effect on SOX9 binding to the 48-bp probe. Mutations in sites 1 and 2 (MA1 and MA4), which decreased formation of the CSEP·DNA complex, had little or no effect on SOX9 binding to the 48-bp probe (Fig. 4C). Hence, these results confirmed that SOX9 binds site 3 and indicated that mutations affected differently binding of CSEP and SOX9 to the 48-bp probe, suggesting again that CSEP contains components other than Sox9 or in addition to Sox9.

Abolition of Chondrocyte-specific Enhancer Activity by Mutations in Three HMG-like Sites-- To test the effect of mutations in the HMG-like sites of the Col2a1 48-bp element on enhancer activity in RCS cells, four tandem repeats of mutant 48-bp elements were cloned into the luciferase vector (Fig. 5). Mutations that strongly decreased the binding of CSEP, i.e. MA1, MA4, and MA6, abolished enhancer activity in RCS cells (Fig. 5). Mutation MA3, which had a much weaker effect on formation of the CSEP·DNA complex in EMSA, had little effect on enhancer activity in RCS cells. Mutation MA7, which increased formation of the CSEP·DNA complex in EMSA, had no significant effect on enhancer activity. Hence, there was a good correlation between formation of the CSEP·48-bp Col2a1 DNA complex and enhancer activity in RCS cells as assayed in transient transfection experiments.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Transcriptional activities of wild-type and mutant 48-bp elements. p89Col2a1 luciferase (LUC) reporter plasmids with no enhancer element (-), four tandem copies of the wild-type 48-bp element, or four tandem copies of the mutant 48-bp elements (MA1 to MA7, as shown in Fig. 4A) were transiently transfected in RCS cells. Promoter activities are measured as luciferase units (multiplied by 4 × 103) per beta -galactosidase unit and are given as average values ± S.D. for triplicate transfections of one representative experiment.

To investigate the in vivo effect of mutations in the three HMG-like sites of the 48-bp enhancer that affected formation of the CSEP·DNA complex, we generated transgenic mice harboring four tandem copies of the 48-bp mutant elements cloned as shown in Fig. 6A (25). As shown previously (6), the wild-type 48-bp element was sufficient to confer chondrocyte-specific expression in transgenic mice (Fig. 6B). However, mutations in any one of the three HMG-like sites 1, 2, and 3 (i.e. MA1, MA4, and MA6) that decreased the formation of the CSEP·DNA complex in EMSA and abolished enhancer activity in transiently transfected RCS cells resulted in loss of chondrocyte-specific transgene expression in vivo. In 14.5-dpc embryos harboring mutant 48-bp elements, promiscuous X-gal staining was detected in various nonchondrogenic tissues such as brain, tongue, tendons, dermis, and spinal cord (Fig. 6, C-E, and Table I). This promiscuous expression pattern varied among individual embryos. Histological analysis confirmed that X-gal staining occurred in these nonchondrogenic tissues (data not shown). In some embryos harboring either mutant MA1 (site 1 mutated) or mutant MA4 (site 2 mutated), occasional weak X-gal staining was also observed in some rib or limb chondrocytes. In contrast, in embryos harboring mutant MA7 (site 3 mutated), which increased the formation of the CSEP·DNA complex and had no significant effect on enhancer activity in transient transfection experiments of RCS cells, beta -galactosidase activity was high and specifically targeted to chondrocytes (Fig. 6, F-H). In conclusion, mutations in three different sites of the 48-bp element that resulted in decreased formation of the CSEP·48-bp DNA complex abolished or greatly inhibited chondrocyte-specific expression in transgenic mouse embryos (Table II).


View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Abolition of chondrocyte-specific expression in transgenic mouse embryos by mutations in the 48-bp Col2a1 enhancer element. A, schematic representation of the transgenes. Four tandem copies of wild-type (WT) or mutant 48-bp elements (MA1 to MA7, as shown in Fig. 4A) were cloned in the p309Col2a1-beta geo vector (25). The p309Col2a1-beta geo vector contains the 309-bp Col2a1 promoter, exon 1 (+1 to +237) in which the translation start sequence has been mutated from ATG to CTG, and 5' part of intron 1 (+238 to +308). The Col2a1 enhancer elements were inserted between +308 and the SA-beta geo-bpA cassette; this cassette includes a splice acceptor (SA), the beta geo gene, which encodes a fusion protein with Escherichia coli beta -galactosidase and neomycin resistance activities, and the bovine growth hormone gene polyadenylation signal (bpA). B-F, lateral views of representative whole mount transgenic founder embryos harboring four tandem copies of wild-type (B) or mutant 48-bp elements (MA1, MA4, MA6, MA7, respectively) (C-F) stained with X-gal at 14.5 dpc. G and H, sagittal sections of the embryo shown in F. ve, vertebra; di, cartilage of digit.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Ratios of transgenic founder embryos positive by X-gal staining versus embryos positive by genomic Southern blot analysis and expression patten of transgenes in 14.5 dpc embryos

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Summary of in vivo and in vitro properties of mutant 48-bp Col2a1 enhancer elements

We previously showed that a single copy of a 468-bp mouse Col2a1 intron 1 element (+1878 to +2345), which includes the 48-bp enhancer, conferred pronounced and strict chondrocyte-specific expression in all cartilages of transgenic embryos (25) (Fig. 7, B and D). Hence, to determine whether the HMG-like sites 1 and 2 were also essential for the activity of this larger intron 1 fragment, we generated mouse embryos harboring a construct containing a single copy of the 468-bp fragment with both of the mutations present in MA1 and MA4 (Fig. 7A). Unlike embryos harboring the wild-type 468-bp construct, six transgenic mouse embryos harboring this mutant 468-bp construct showed X-gal staining but none that was cartilage-specific. Promiscuous X-gal staining occurred in eyes, ears, vibrissae, interdigital areas, and skin (Fig. 7C and data not shown). Histological analysis also showed X-gal staining in dermis and tendons (Fig. 7E). There was weak, limited X-gal staining in a subset of chondrocytes of some cartilages in some of these mice. Together these results indicated that the HMG-like sites 1 or 2 are essential for achieving the in vivo high level chondrocyte-specific activity of the single copy 468-bp Col2a1 intron 1 fragment.


View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Effect of mutations in HMG-like sites 1 and 2 on chondrocyte-specific transgene expression in embryos harboring a single copy 468-bp Col2a1 enhancer. A, schematic representation of the DNA construct used to generate transgenic mice harboring a mutant 468-bp Col2a1 intron 1 element (+1878 to +2345). One copy of the wild-type or mutant 468-bp element (with mutations M1 and M4, indicated within the 48-bp element) was inserted in inverse orientation into the p309Col2a1-beta geo vector (see legend to Fig. 6A). B and C, lateral views of representative whole mount transgenic founder embryos harboring one copy of the wild-type (B) or mutant (MUT) 468-bp element (C) and stained with X-gal at 14.5 dpc. D and E, sagittal sections through the thoracic cage (D) and forelimb of embryos shown (E), respectively, in B and C. c, cartilages; d, dermis; t, tendons.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

In 14.5-dpc transgenic mouse embryos, four tandem repeats of the 48-bp enhancer in combination with a 309-bp Col2a1 promoter targeted the expression of a beta -galactosidase reporter gene to chondrocytes specifically (6). Transgenic mouse embryos harboring a 309-bp Col2a1 promoter that lacked intron 1 enhancer sequences showed no beta -galactosidase expression in chondrocytes (25). Now we have shown that when the Col2a1 promoter is replaced with a minimal beta -globin promoter, the multimerized 48-bp intron 1 Col2a1 element is still able to target expression of the lacZ transgene specifically to chondrocytes in 14.5 dpc transgenic mouse embryos, indicating that Col2a1 promoter sequences are dispensable for chondrocyte-specific expression in vivo and that the 48-bp Col2a1 DNA segment contains all the information necessary to confer chondrocyte-specific expression in intact mouse embryos.

In previous transient expression experiments, 12 tandem copies of an 18-bp sub-element of the 48-bp sequence were a more potent chondrocyte-specific enhancer than four tandem copies of the 48-bp element (6). However, in transgenic mice, the 12 tandem copies of the 18-bp sequence were much less effective in conferring a high level and strict chondrocyte specificity in vivo (6). We therefore hypothesized that additional sequences outside the 18-bp segment in the 48-bp element were needed to achieve such high level chondrocyte-specific expression in vivo. Our present results show that mutations in three different sites of the 48-bp element resulted in loss of chondrocyte-specific enhancer activity both in transgenic mouse embryos and in transient expression experiments. Two of these sites, sites 1 and 2, are located outside the 18-bp element (only the 3' part of site 2 is present in the 18-bp sequence), which includes the previously identified Sox9-binding site (site 3) (6, 22). All three mutations disrupt potential binding sites for HMG domain proteins.

When nuclear extracts from chondrocytes were used in EMSAs with the 48-bp probe, no complex formed that had the mobility of the major complex formed between SOX9 synthesized in vitro and the 48-bp probe. However, a prominent, slower migrating complex was formed with nuclear proteins present in primary chondrocytes and chondrocytic cell lines but not in other cell lines (CSEP). Since a limited supershift of the CSEP·DNA complex was observed with SOX9 antibodies, it is likely that Sox9 was present in the complex. However, because SOX9 antibodies supershifted only a fraction of the CSEP·48-bp DNA complex, we hypothesized that the CSEP·48-bp DNA complex also included one or more proteins distinct from Sox9.

Additional lines of evidence further support this hypothesis. First, although Sox9 is present in 10T1/2 cells, no CSEP·48-bp DNA complex was formed with nuclear extracts of these cells. Second, after fractionation of chondrocyte nuclear extracts by SDS-PAGE followed by protein elution and renaturation, a protein or proteins with an apparent Mr of 75,000-95,000 formed a complex with the 48-bp sequence that had the same mobility and the same DNA-binding properties as the CSEP·48-bp DNA complex; this complex was not supershifted by SOX9 antibodies. As Western blot analysis revealed, SOX9 ran as a unique species with an apparent Mr of 68,000 (22). Our data also suggest that proteins present in the CSEP·48-bp complex, which are different from Sox9, are HMG-like proteins. Indeed, a complex with a mobility and DNA-binding properties similar to those of the CSEP·48-bp complex was formed with chondrocyte extracts and an oligonucleotide containing a consensus binding site for HMG domain proteins; this complex was not affected by SOX9 antibodies. Moreover, formation of this complex was competed by the 48-bp probe. In addition, mutations in three HMG-like sites of the 48-bp element decreased formation of the CSEP·DNA complex.

Formation of the CSEP·48-bp DNA complex was decreased by mutations in any one of the three HMG-like sites of the 48-bp enhancer, but it was completely abolished only when the three sites were mutated altogether. Hence, the components of CSEP bound to the three sites of the 48-bp element. Since mutations in any one of these three sites also abolished the chondrocyte-specific enhancer activity of the 48-bp Col2a1 element both in transgenic mice and in DNA transfection experiments, we hypothesize that CSEP has a role in enhancer activity.

In experiments by others (23), a 309-bp intron 1 sequence of the human COL2A1 gene that included the sequence of the 18-bp enhancer at its 5' end was also shown to confer chondrocyte-specific expression in transgenic mouse embryos. Two binding sites for Sox9 were identified in this 309-bp segment, one corresponding to site 3 of Fig. 4 and the other about 50 bp 3' of it. Mutations in either one of these sites inhibited chondrocyte-specific expression of a reporter gene in transgenic embryos either in all or many cartilages (23). In our previous experiments, a single copy Col2a1 468-bp segment that included these two Sox9-binding sites as well as 310 bp 5' of the 48-bp element conferred strict chondrocyte-specific expression in transgenic mice. Now we have shown that a single copy 468-bp fragment with mutations in the two HMG-like sites 1 and 2 located upstream of the two Sox9-binding sites could not confer chondrocyte specificity in transgenic embryos despite the presence of two intact Sox9-binding sites in the fragment. This suggests that several HMG-like binding sites need to be occupied by transcription factors in order to activate the single copy 468-bp transgene at high levels in all cartilages in vivo.

Overall our results suggest a model in which both Sox9 and other proteins present in the CSEP·DNA complex bind to several HMG-like sites in the chondrocyte-specific Col2a1 gene to control its chondrocyte-specific expression. To identify these other proteins and study their function, the cDNAs for these proteins will need to be cloned.

In experiments reported in the accompanying article (38), we have identified two short chondrocyte-specific enhancer elements within the promoter of the mouse gene for the alpha 2 subunit of type XI collagen (Col11a2), a gene that is expressed preferentially in chondrocytes. Like the Col2a1 48-bp enhancer both elements contain several HMG-like sites and formed a DNA-protein complex with extracts of RCS cells that was dependent on the sequence of these sites. Furthermore, these complexes had the same mobility as the CSEP·48-bp Col2a1 complex and, similarly, appeared to contain SOX9 and other proteins. Like the Col2a1 enhancer, the Col11a2 elements were also able to activate reporter genes in chondrocytes, but not in fibroblasts, and were activated by forced expression of SOX9 in non-chondrocytic cells. Both Col11a2 elements also directed transgene expression to chondrocytes in mouse embryos. On the basis of these similarities, we speculate that common mechanisms involving both Sox9 and the other proteins present in CSEP may control the chondrocyte-specific expression of the Col2a1 and Col11a2 genes and perhaps a larger genetic program of chondrocyte differentiation.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are very grateful to Vincent R. Harley and Peter N. Goodfellow for the generous gift of SOX9 antibodies; James H. Kimura for the gift of RCS cells; and Françoise Coustry, Susin Chen, Lee Ann Garrett, and Xin Zhou for providing nuclear extracts from various cell types. We also thank Janie Finch for editorial assistance.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants R01 AR42909 and P01 AR42919-02 (to B. d. C.). The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Core Sequencing Facility, in which DNA sequencing was performed, is supported by National Institutes of Health Grant CA16672 (NCI).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Current address: Dept. of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030.

§ Recipient of an Arthritis Investigator Award from the Arthritis Foundation.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular Genetics, the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030. Tel.: 713-792-2590; Fax: 713-794-4295.

1 The abbreviations used are: Col2a1, pro-alpha 1(II) collagen gene; CD, campomelic dysplasia; CSEP, chondrocyte-specific enhancer-binding protein; dpc, days postcoitum; beta geo, a fusion protein with E. coli beta -galactosidase and neomycin resistance activities; bp, base pair(s); HMG, high mobility group; RCS, rat chondrosarcoma cells; X-gal, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-beta -D-galactopyranosides; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assays; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Cancedda, R., Descalzi Cancedda, F., and Castagnola, P. (1995) Int. Rev. Cytol. 159, 265-358[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Erlebacher, A., Filvaroff, E. H., Gitelman, S. E., and Derynck, R. (1995) Cell 80, 271-278
  3. Cheah, K. S., Lan, E. T., Au, P. K., and Tam, P. P. (1991) Development 111, 945-953[Abstract]
  4. Li, S.-H., Prockop, D. J., Helminen, H., Fässler, R., Lapveteläinen, T., Kiraly, K., Peltarri, A., Arokoski, J., Lui, H., Arita, M., and Khillan, J. S. (1995) Genes Dev. 9, 2821-2830[Abstract]
  5. Zhao, Q., Eberspaecher, H., Lefebvre, V., and de Crombrugghe, B. (1997) Dev. Dyn. 209, 377-386[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Lefebvre, V., Zhou, G., Mukhopadhyay, K., Smith, C. N., Zhang, Z., Eberspaecher, H., Zhou, X., Sinha, S., Maity, S. N., and de Crombrugghe, B. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 4512-4523[Abstract]
  7. Goodfellow, P. N., and Lovell-Badge, R. (1993) Annu. Rev. Genet. 27, 71-92[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Koopman, P., Gubbay, J., Vivian, N., Goodfellow, P., and Lovell-Badge, R. (1991) Nature 351, 117-121[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Wright, E. M., Snopek, B., and Koopman, P. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 744[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Baxevanis, A. D., and Landsman, D. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 1604-1613[Abstract]
  11. Grosschedl, R., Giese, K., and Pagel, J. (1994) Trends Genet. 10, 94-100[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Laudet, V., Stehelin, D., and Clevers, H. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 2493-2501[Abstract]
  13. Foster, J. W., Dominguez-Steglich, M. A., Guioli, S., Kwok, C., Weller, P. A., Stevanovic, M., Weissenbach, J., Mansour, S., Young, I. D., Goodfellow, P. N., Brook, J. D., and Schafer, A. J. (1994) Nature 372, 525-530[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Kwok, C., Weller, P. A., Guioli, S., Foster, J. W., Mansour, S., Zuffardi, O., Punett, H. H., Dominguez-Steglich, M. A., Brook, J. D., Young, I. D., Goodfellow, P. N., and Schafer, A. J. (1995) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 57, 1028-1036[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Wagner, T., Wirth, J., Meyer, J., Zabel, B., Held, M., Zimmer, J., Pasantes, J., Dagna Bricarelli, F., Keutel, J., Hustert, E., Wolf, U., Tommerup, N., Schempp, W., and Scherer, G. (1994) Cell 79, 1111-1120[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Wirth, J., Wagner, T., Meyer, J., Pfeiffer, R. A., Tietze, H.-U., Schempp, W., and Scherer, G. (1996) Hum. Genet. 97, 186-193[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Südbeck, P., Schmitz, L., Baeuerle, P. A., and Scherer, G. (1996) Nat. Genet. 13, 230-232[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Wright, E., Hargrave, M. R., Christiansen, J., Cooper, L., Kun, J., Evans, T., Gangadharan, U., Greenfield, A., and Koopman, P. (1995) Nat. Genet. 9, 15-20[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Ng, L.-J., Wheatley, S., Muscat, G. E. O., Conway-Campbell, J., Bowles, J., Wright, E., Bell, D. M., Tam, P. P. L., Cheah, K. S. E., and Koopman, P. (1997) Dev. Biol. 183, 108-121[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. da Silva, S. M., Hacker, A., Harley, V., Goodfellow, P., Swain, A., and Lovell-Badge, R. (1996) Nat. Genet. 13, 62-68
  21. Kent, J., Wheatley, S. C., Andrews, J. E., Sinclair, A. H., and Koopman, P. (1996) Development 122, 2813-2822[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Lefebvre, V., Huang, W., Harley, V. R., Goodfellow, P. N., and de Crombrugghe, B. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 2336-2346[Abstract]
  23. Bell, D. M., Leung, K. K. H., Wheatley, S. C., Ng, L. J., Zhou, S., Ling, K. W., Sham, M. H., Koopman, P., Tam, P. P. L., and Cheah, K. S. E. (1997) Nat. Genet. 16, 174-178[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Mukhopadhyay, K., Lefebvre, V., Zhou, G., Garofalo, S., Kimura, J. H., and de Crombrugghe, B. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 27711-27719[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Zhou, G., Garofalo, S., Mukhopadhyay, K., Lefebvre, V., Smith, C. N., Eberspaecher, H., and de Crombrugghe, B. (1995) J. Cell Sci. 108, 3677-3684[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Chen, C. A., and Okayama, H. (1988) BioTechniques 6, 632-638[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Dailey, L., Yuan, H., and Basilico, C. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 7758-7769[Abstract]
  28. van de Wetering, M., and Clevers, H. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 3039-3044[Abstract]
  29. French, S. W., Schmidt, M. C., and Glorioso, J. C. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 5393-5399[Abstract]
  30. Wegner, M., and Grummt, F. (1990) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 166, 1110-1117[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Herr, W., and Cleary, M. A. (1995) Genes Dev. 9, 1679-1693[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Harley, V. R., Jackson, D. I., Hextall, P. J., Hawkins, J. R., Berkovitz, G. D., Sockanathan, S., Lovell-Badge, R., and Goodfellow, P. N. (1992) Science 255, 453-456[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Churchill, M. E. A., Jones, D. N. M., Glaser, T., Hefner, H., Searles, M. A., and Travers, A. A. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 1264-1275[Abstract]
  34. Connor, F., Wright, E., Denny, P., Koopman, P., and Ashworth, A. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 3365-3372[Abstract]
  35. Connor, F., Cary, P. D., Read, C. M., Preston, N. S., Driscoll, P. C., Denny, P., Crane-Robinson, C., and Ashworth, A. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 3339-3346
  36. Hosking, B. M., Muscat, G. E. O., Koopman, P. A., Dowhan, D. H., and Dunn, T. L. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 2626-2628[Abstract]
  37. Harley, V. R., Lovell-Badge, R., and Goodfellow, P. N. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 1500-1501[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Bridgewater, L. C., Lefebvre, V., and de Crombrugghe, B. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 14998-15006[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.