Novel Galactose-binding Proteins in Annelida
CHARACTERIZATION OF 29-kDa TANDEM REPEAT-TYPE LECTINS FROM THE EARTHWORM LUMBRICUS TERRESTRIS*

Jun HirabayashiDagger , Samir Kumar Dutta§, and Ken-ichi Kasai

From the Department of Biological Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Teikyo University, Sagamiko, Kanagawa 199-0195, Japan

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Novel type lectins were found in the phylum Annelida, i.e. in the earthworm, tubifex, leech, and lugworm. The lectins (29-31 kDa) were extracted from the worms without the use of detergent and purified by affinity chromatography on asialofetuin-agarose. On the basis of the partial primary structures of the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris 29-kDa lectin (EW29), degenerate primers were synthesized for use in the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. An amplified 155-base pair fragment was used to screen a cDNA library. Four types of full-length clones were obtained, all of which encoded 260 amino acids, but which were found to differ at 29 nucleotide positions. Since three of them resulted in non-silent substitutions, EW29 mRNA was considered to be a mixture of at least three distinct polynucleotides encoding the following proteins: Ala44-Gln197-Ile213 (clone 5), Gly44-Gln197-Val213 (clone 7), and Ala44-His197-Ile213 (clones 8 and 9; different at the nucleotide level, but encoding an identical polypeptide). Genomic polymerase chain reaction using DNA from a single worm revealed that the single worm already had four sets of cDNAs. The EW29 protein showed two features. First, the lectin was composed of two homologous domains (14,500 Da) showing 27% identity with each other. When each of the domains was separately expressed in Escherichia coli, the C-terminal domain was found to bind to asialofetuin-agarose as strongly as the whole protein, whereas the N-terminal domain did not bind and only retardation was observed. EW29 was found to exist as a monomer under non-denaturing conditions. It had significant hemagglutinating activity, which was inhibited by a wide range of galactose-containing saccharides. Second, EW29 contained multiple short conserved motifs, "Gly-X-X-X-Gln-X-Trp." Similar motifs have been found in many carbohydrate-recognizing proteins from an extensive variety of organisms, e.g. plant lectin ricin B-chain and Clostridium botulinum 33-kDa hemagglutinin. Therefore, these carbohydrate-recognition proteins appear to form a protein superfamily.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Galactose-binding proteins (lectins) represent a distinguished group among lectins because statistics have shown that more than 60% of the lectins reported thus far are galactose-specific (1). A possible explanation for such a preference is that galactose was selected as an important "recognition" saccharide especially in higher organisms. In fact, galactose is used more frequently in higher organisms like mammals, whereas glucose and mannose are recognized by microorganisms such as bacteria and fungi. From a glycochemical viewpoint, galactose has a nature inherently distinct from that of glucose, mannose, or fructose. The latter three monosaccharides are related by "Lobry de Bruyn-Alberta van Ekenstein transformation" (2). It is well established that in N-linked oligosacharide biosynthesis galactose is incorporated at later stages after removal of glucosyl and mannosyl residues from the common precursor Glc3Man9GlcNAc2 (3, 4). These observations led one of the authors to present a hypothesis on the origin of elementary hexoses that galactose is a "latecomer" saccharide relative to glucose and mannose (5). Galactose is exposed at outermost spaces of cells unless it is masked by sialic acids, so that it is easily recognized by various communication molecules by homophilic carbohydrate-carbohydrate (6) or heterophilic carbohydrate-protein interactions (7).

Among galactose-specific lectins, galectins are unique in that all of the members belonging to this family are galactose-specific (8, 9). In general, they are soluble and require no metal ion for their activity. Galectins bind most preferentially to lactosamine-containing saccharides of both glycoproteins and glycolipids. Although galectins had long been believed to occur in vertebrates only, they proved to be distributed in much lower organisms as well (10-15). Although the biological roles of galectins are not fully understood, they are supposed to play multiple roles basic to multicellular organisms, such as in development, differentiation, tumorigenesis, metastasis, apoptosis, etc. In this regard, if galectins are essential for these biological processes, they would be expected to exist in all animal species. However, there have been only few reports of galectins other than in two animal phyla representing deuterostomes and protostomes, i.e. Vertebrata and Nematoda, respectively. On the other hand, if this is not the case, a possibility emerges that some other galactose-binding lectins compensate for the absence of galectins in such animal phyla.

We have undertaken screening of galectin-like proteins from the phylum Annelida, by employing the same purification strategy as that for galectins, i.e. lactose-specific extraction in the absence of detergent and metal ion, and affinity chromatography on asialofetuin-agarose. As a result, 29-31-kDa lectins were purified from four annelids as follows: earthworm, tubifex (both belonging to the class Oligochaeta), lugworm (Polychaeta), and leech (Hirudinea). These proteins immunologically cross-reacted with one another and had similar biochemical properties as galectins with respect to specificity, solubility, and metal independence. Detailed structural analysis including cDNA cloning was carried out for 29-kDa lectin from the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris. As a result, the earthworm 29-kDa lectin (designated hereafter EW29)1 proved to be a "tandem repeat"-type lectin, which consists of two tandemly repeated homologous domains (14.5 kDa). Contrary to our expectation, it showed no sequence homology to the known galectins. However, it showed resemblance to some carbohydrate-relating proteins such as ricin B-chain, C. botulinum hemagglutinin, etc. It also contained conserved multiple repeats of short motifs.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Worms-- Earthworms (Allolobophora japonica and L. terrestris), tubifex (Tubifex hattai), and lugworm (Neanthes japonica) were purchased from local fishing shops. Leeches (Glossiphonia complanata) were harvested from shallow irrigation water in Toyama Prefecture, Japan. The worms were rinsed with cold PBS, weighed, and processed immediately for lectin purification.

Purification of Annelid Lectins-- Lectins were extracted from worms by essentially the same procedure previously described for galectins (16, 17); briefly, worms were disrupted by homogenization in a Polytron (Kinematica) with 5 volumes of cold EDTA-MEPBS (4 mM beta -mercaptoethanol, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.2, 150 mM NaCl). After the bulk of soluble proteins had been removed by centrifugation (15,000 rpm, 4 °C, 25 min), the lectins were specifically extracted from the precipitate (ppt-1) with EDTA-MEPBS containing 20 mM lactose by shaking for 30 min at 4 °C. After centrifugation as above, the obtained extract (sup-2) was extensively dialyzed to remove lactose and then applied to a column of asialofetuin-agarose (bed volume, 10 ml) prepared according to De Waard et al. (18). After washing of the column with EDTA-MEPBS (400 ml), bound protein was eluted with the same buffer containing 20 mM lactose.

Protein concentration was determined by use of the Bio-Rad Protein Assay Dye Reagent. Protein-containing fractions were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel (14%) electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) under reducing conditions, unless otherwise stated. Protein was visualized with a Wako Silver Stain Kit.

Separation of EW29 by High Performance Gel-permeation Chromatography-- The main component (29 kDa) of the affinity purified lectin fraction from earthworms (EW29) was further purified by high performance gel-permeation chromatography on a TSK-G2000SWXL column (7.5 × 300 mm). The column was equilibrated and eluted with EDTA-PBS both in the presence and absence of 20 mM lactose at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. Protein elution was monitored by absorbance at 280 nm. For the subsequent hemagglutination assay, lactose was removed by extensive dialysis against EDTA-PBS.

Hemagglutination Assay-- Basically, the conventional assay system described by Nowak et al. (19) was used; briefly, 25 µl of serially diluted samples was mixed in each well of a 96-well microtiter V plate with 25 µl of EDTA-PBS, 25 µl of 1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin in saline, and 25 µl of trypsinized rabbit erythrocytes. After the plate had stood at room temperature for 1 h, "dot" (no agglutination) or "mat" (agglutination) formation was judged. For assessment of the inhibitory effect of various mono- and oligosaccharides, 25 µl of maximally diluted lectin solution that gave mat formation and 25 µl of serially diluted inhibitor saccharides were used in place of serially diluted samples and EDTA-PBS, respectively. Minimum concentrations that gave negative dot formation under the above conditions were defined as I50.

Effect of Saccharides on Extraction of Earthworm Lectin-- The effect of various saccharides on lectin extraction was investigated as described previously (12); earthworm lectin was extracted from small portions of ppt-1 (equivalent to 1-g wet weight of the worm) in the presence of a 0.1 M concentration of various sugars. After centrifugation, the supernatant solutions were subjected to SDS-PAGE, followed by Western blotting on a nitrocellulose membrane. The lectin was stained by a conventional double antibody method using anti-tubifex lectin antiserum (described below) and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG antiserum (Seikagaku Co., Tokyo). Both antisera were used at a 1,000-fold dilution. For peroxidase detection, POD Immunostain Set or High Sensitive Immunoblotting Kit (both from Wako Chemicals, Tokyo) was used.

Production of Antisera-- Antisera were raised in rabbits against either affinity purified tubifex lectin or affinity and gel filtration-purified EW29 by injecting the animals several times at 10-14-day intervals with 0.1-0.2 mg of lectin emulsified with Freund's complete adjuvant. Titer of the produced antisera was evaluated by both dot and Western blotting analyses. The antisera were stored at 4 °C in the presence of 0.02% NaN3.

Protein Structural Analyses-- Affinity purified lectins from earthworm, tubifex, and leech were further purified by reversed phase chromatography on a TSK TMS250 column (4.6 × 75 mm). Protein was eluted by a linear gradient of acetonitrile (20-60%, v/v) in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. The separated lectin fractions were lyophilized, dissolved in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 9.0, and digested with Achromobacter protease I (Wako Chemicals, Tokyo). Generated peptides were separated by reversed phase chromatography on a TSK-ODS-80TM column (7.5 × 250 mm) and were analyzed by a protein sequencer (Applied 477A) as described (17). The peptides were designated "Lys"-1, -2, -3 and so on, in the order of elution. In addition, in the case of earthworm 29-kDa lectin, reduction and S-carboxymethylation was also performed prior to the protease digestion. Thus derived peptides were prefixed "Cm-Lys."

Preparation of Genomic DNA from Earthworms-- Genomic DNA was prepared from two earthworm species, A. japonica and L. terrestris, by a conventional procedure (20). A few worms were used for the preparation from A. japonica, and a single worm was used for that from L. terrestris to assess the observed gene polymorphism (described below).

cDNA Cloning of EW29-- A probe DNA was prepared by means of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). For amplification of a part of earthworm lectin gene, four sets of convergent oligonucleotide primers were synthesized based on the determined peptide sequences (Lys-4, Lys-7, Lys-8, and Lys-10), designated as Lys-4F/4R, Lys-7F/7R, Lys-8F/8R, and Lys-10F/10R (see Table IV for detail). PCR was performed by use of all combinations of the above forward (F) and reverse (R) primers and a Takara LA-PCR Kit (94 °C, 30 s; 52 °C, 1 min, 72 °C, 3 min for 35 cycles, then 72 °C, 10 min). Genomic DNA prepared from the earthworm A. japonica was used as a template. The amplified DNA (155 bp) obtained with primers Lys-4F and Lys-7R was cloned into pCRII (Invitrogen) on the basis of TA-cloning strategy according to the manufacturer's instruction, and the nucleotide sequence was confirmed with an Applied 373S DNA sequencer.

For cloning of full-length cDNAs, a lambda ZAP cDNA library (kindly provided by Dr. Giebing, Düsseldorf, Germany) was screened with the above 155-bp PCR fragment labeled with [alpha 32P]dCTP by use of an Amersham Megaprime Kit. A standard plaque hybridization was performed for screening 3 × 105 phages as described by Sambrook et al. (20). Eight positive phages were obtained and converted into plasmid pBluescript (Stratagene) by an automatic in vivo excision system according to the manufacturer's instructions. The plasmids were cut with EcoRI and XhoI to confirm the insert size and subjected to sequence analysis using an Applied 373S sequencer.

Production of Recombinant Earthworm Lectins, Wh, Nh, and Ch-- Expression plasmids for recombinant EW29 protein (Wh), N-terminal domain (Nh; meaning N-half), and C-terminal domain (Ch) were constructed by a PCR procedure; for the production of Wh, a pair of oligonucleotide primers were designed, i.e. G ATG GCT GGA AGG CCT TTT CTG (Met1-Ala-Gly-Arg-Pro-Phe-Leu; designated Wh-F; see Table IV) and CGAGTGGAGT TTA CTC GGA TTC G (antisense, Glu258-Ser-Glu-Ter; Wh-R), and a full-length fragment (794-bp) encoding 260 amino acids was amplified with a full-length plasmid (clone 5) used as a template. The derived fragment was cloned into pCRII in frame with beta -galactosidase alpha -peptide, and the derived plasmid was used to transform Escherichia coli TOP10F' (Invitrogen). Positive clones were selected by colony immunoblot analysis using specific antiserum against EW29 and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG as described previously (21). The cloned E. coli was proliferated to full growth in 1 liter of LB medium in the presence of antibiotics at 37 °C. The recombinant protein was induced by adding isopropyl-beta -thiogalactoside to give a final concentration of 0.2 mM and incubating the culture for 2 h at the same temperature. The cells were collected and lysed by sonication, and recombinant protein was adsorbed to asialofetuin-agarose, as described previously (10).

For construction of plasmids for expression of individual domains (Nh and Ch), pairs of oligonucleotide primers for an interdomain region were designed, i.e. C ATG AAG CCG AAG TTC TTC TAC ATC (Met129-Lys-Pro-Lys-Phe-Phe-Tyr-Ile; designated Ch-F; underline denotes introduced mutations) and TTA GAA GAA CTT CGG CTT CAA GTG (antisense, His128-Leu-Lys-Pro-Lys-Phe-Phe-Ter; Nh-R). For production of Nh and Ch, primer sets Wh-F/Nh-R and Ch-F/Wh-R were used, respectively. All other procedures were the same as those employed for Wh.

Single Worm Genomic PCR-- In order to assess a cause for the polymorphism found in the earthworm lectin cDNAs (described under "Results"), genomic DNA was prepared from a single worm, and genomic PCR was performed with primers Wh-F and Wh-R to amplify a full-length region. After cloning of the derived fragments (0.8 kilobase pairs) into pCRII and transformation of E. coli TOP10F', 9 independent genomic clones were selected and their nucleotide sequences were compared with one another and to those derived from the cDNA cloning.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Identification of Galactose-binding Lectins in Annelids-- Based on the concept that galectins are bound to insoluble glycoconjugates but are solubilized with a competing sugar, lactose, we applied the same procedure to purify annelid lectins as employed for galectins (10, 16, 17) as follows: (i) galactose-specific extraction in the absence of metal ions, and (ii) affinity chromatography on asialofetuin-agarose. A typical result of affinity chromatography on asialofetuin-agarose is shown for earthworm lectin in Fig. 1A, and the results of SDS-PAGE for all four annelid speceis, i.e. earthworm, tubifex, leech and lugworm, are shown in Fig. 1B. Major molecular species observed after lactose elution from the column were the following: 29 kDa (earthworm), 31 kDa (tubifex), 30 kDa (leech), and 30 kDa (lugworm). The observed sizes were also similar to those reported for either mammalian chimera-type (29-35 kDa) (22) or nematode tandem repeat-type galectins (32 kDa; see Refs. 10, 11, and 13). Since these lectins were obtained in the absence of metal ion, they were considered not to be C-type lectins. The fact that no detergent was necessary for the extraction also excluded the possibility that the annelid lectins are membrane-bound proteins. The yields of purified lectins from the four annelid species are summarized in Table I.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Purification of annelid lectins by affinity chromatography. Lectins were extracted with EDTA-MEPBS containing 20 mM lactose from earthworm, tubifex, leech, and lugworm and were purified by affinity chromatography on asialofetuin-agarose. A, a typical result of affinity chromatography obtained for earthworm lectin. Lactose extract (sup-2) was applied to a column of asialofetuin-agarose (bed volume, 10 ml) equilibrated with EDTA-MEPBS. After extensive washing of the column with EDTA-MEPBS, adsorbed lectin was eluted with 20 mM lactose (arrow). B, the result of SDS-PAGE of the affinity purified fractions from various annelids. 1st lane, earthworm; 2nd lane, tubifex; 3rd lane, lugworm; and 4th lane, leech. Protein was visualized by standard silver staining. Electrophoresis was performed by use of 14% gels under reducing conditions.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Summary of purification yields of galactose-specific lectins from four annelid species

Beside major molecular species (29-31 kDa), earthworm, tubifex, and leech preparations also showed the presence of multiple smaller fragments of 15-17 kDa (Fig. 1B). However, the following observations suggest that these fragments were derived by proteolysis of the 29-31-kDa species. (i) When purification of earthworm lectin was processed as rapidly as possible (e.g. within 2 days) and special care was taken for the maintenance of the homogenate at a low temperature, the proportion of the 16-kDa species in Fig. 1B was considerably decreased (data not shown). (ii) Among the four species of annelids, the amount of smaller fragments was highest in the most fragile worm, tubifex (see Fig. 1B). (iii) The sizes of smaller fragments were almost half of those of the main species (29-31 kDa). To confirm the above possibility, we isolated the 16-kDa earthworm protein by reversed phase chromatography and compared its peptide sequences with those of EW29. Since both molecular species gave identical peptide sequences (data not shown), at least some of the smaller fragments were considered to be degradation products of the 29-31-kDa proteins, probably due to cleavage at the connecting region between tandemly repeated domains (described below).

Comparison of Structures of Annelid Lectins-- In order to elucidate the structural relationship between the annelid lectins, we first attempted Western blotting analysis by using anti-tubifex lectin antiserum. As shown in Fig. 2, all of the lectins purified from the other annelids were also positive, together with the smaller fragments described above. The degree of cross-reactivities with leech (Hirudinea) and lugworm (Polychaeta) proteins was relatively weak, probably reflecting phylogenic kinship between tubifex and earthworm (both belonging to the same class, Oligochaeta). When crude lectin extracts (sup-2) were used instead of purified fractions, only high molecular species (29-31 kDa) were observed. This is consistent with the above assumption that smaller fragments were digestion products.


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Immunological cross-reactivity between purified annelid lectins. Affinity purified lectins from earthworm, tubifex, leech, and lugworm (each 100 ng) were subjected to Western blotting by a conventional double-antibody method using antiserum raised against tubifex lectin as the first antibody and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG as the second antibody, as described under "Experimental Procedures." The antibody binding was visualized by the enhanced chemiluminescence procedure.

For more direct structural comparison, affinity purified lectins from earthworm, tubifex, and leech were further purified by reversed phase chromatography on a TSK-TMS250 (data not shown) and digested with lysine-specific Achromobacter protease I. The derived peptides were separated on a TSK ODS-80TM column and were analyzed by a protein sequencer. For earthworm lectin, we also carried out reduction and S-carboxymethylation to identify cysteine residues. The results of peptide analyses, summarized in Table II, strongly suggest that these annelid lectins are structurally related. In particular, most of the lectins had multiple similar sequences represented by "Gly-X-X-X-Gln-X-Trp." Moreover, some of the sequences containing this short motif showed highest similarity; in case of earthworm lectin, these included His-Gly-Gln-Asp-Ala-Gln-Gln-Trp (Lys-4), His-Gly-Gly-Thr-Asn-Gln-Gln-Trp (Lys-7), and Asn-Gly-Gly-Pro-Asn-Gln-Ala-Trp (Lys-10; conserved residues underlined). This indicates that the annelid lectin contained a significant number of repeats.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Summary of peptide sequences derived by lysylendopeptidase digestion of annelid lectins
Numbers on the first amino acid residues of most earthworm peptides are the position numbers (initial Met as position 1). Lowercase letters represent amino acids for which determination is ambiguous. Prefex Cm represents peptides derived by lysylendopeptidase digestion after EW29 was denatured and S-carboxymethylated. Bold letters denote conserved three amino acid residues in the repetitive motif, GxxxQxW (Y or F). Underlined residues indicate corresponding nucleotide sequence used as a PCR primer.

Effect of Saccharides on Lectin Extraction-- Since it became evident that annelid lectins are structurally related, subsequent studies were focused on the earthworm 29-kDa lectin (EW29), because its purification yield was the best among the species examined (Table I). First, various saccharides were tested for their ability to extract the lectin from the earthworm precipitate (ppt-1) as described under "Experimental Procedures." As a result, among various simple saccharides, only galactose, lactose, and melibiose were found to be effective. On the other hand, glucose, alpha -methylmannoside, L-fucose, maltose, and sucrose had no effect even at the highest concentration used (100 mM; data not shown). As the next step, concentrations of the effective saccharides were changed (i.e. 1, 10, and 100 mM), and the amounts of extracted lectin were compared (Fig. 3). Lactose and melibiose showed almost the same ability to extract the lectin at 10 and 100 mM, whereas galactose showed slightly poorer ability. It is notable that EW29 was extractable with not only lactose, but also galactose and melibiose (Galbeta 1,6Glc), a linkage isomer of lactose (Galbeta 1,4Glc). Such a feature has never been observed for galectins.


View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Extraction of earthworm lectin with various saccharides. Earthworm was homogenized with EDTA-MEPBS in the absence of saccharide. After centrifugation, the soluble fraction (sup-1) was removed, and an insoluble fraction (ppt-1) was then divided into 10 portions, from which lectin was extracted with MEPBS containing one of the following saccharides: 100, 10, 1 mM lactose (lanes 1-3, respectively), 100, 10, 1 mM melibiose (lanes 4-6), and 100, 10, 1 mM galactose (lanes 7-9). Each lane contained 10 µg of protein. Glucose, methyl-alpha -mannoside, L-fucose, maltose, and sucrose had no effect on lectin extraction (data not shown).

Oligomeric Structure and Hemagglutinating Activity of EW29-- High performance gel filtration analysis was carried out to estimate the molecular organization of EW29 under non-denaturing conditions. The affinity purified earthworm lectin (a mixture of major 29-kDa and minor 15-17-kDa fragments) was applied to a TSK G2000SWXL column in the presence of 20 mM lactose (Fig. 4A), since in its absence the protein elution was considerably retarded. Fractions showing UV adsorption (280 nm) were subjected to SDS-PAGE analysis (Fig. 4B). By comparing eluting positions of marker proteins, the 29-kDa lectin was considered to exist as a monomer (calculated mass, 30,000 Da). SDS-PAGE analysis showed that the purified fraction was >95% pure and almost free of the 16-kDa species. We used this fraction as highly purified EW29 for the production of specific antiserum and for the following hemagglutination test.


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Separation of EW29 by high performance gel-permeation chromatography. A, affinity purified earthworm lectin (50 µg), consisting of 29 kDa and smaller molecular species (15-17 kDa), was applied to a column of TSK G2000SWXL (7.5 × 300 mm) equilibrated with EDTA-PBS containing 40 mM sodium phosphate and 20 mM lactose. Protein was eluted at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min while monitoring absorbance at 280 nm and was fractionated every 0.5 min from when the first protein elution began (15 min). Marker proteins used for calibration were as follows: bovine serum albumin (66,000 Da), chicken ovalbumin (45,000 Da), bovine carbonic anhydrase B (29,000 Da), and bovine pancreatic ribonuclease A (13,800 Da). B, the result of SDS-PAGE for the fractionated proteins. Electrophoresis was carried out under reducing conditions using 14% gel. Protein was stained with silver.

Thus purified EW29 agglutinated trypsinized rabbit erythrocytes at the minimum concentration of approximately 10 µg/ml (final concentration in the assay, 2.5 µg/ml). This agglutinating ability means that EW29 has more than one sugar-binding site per 29-kDa polypeptide, as it was proved to exist as a monomer. A panel of saccharides was tested for inhibitory activity toward hemagglutination as described under "Experimental Procedures." No saccharides lacking galactose showed inhibition. This is consistent with the result of lectin extraction as described above. On the other hand, galactose-containing saccharides showed varied inhibitory effects on hemagglutination, which were expressed as I50 in Table III. The results are summarized as follows. (i) As regards monosaccharides, galactose had similar inhibitory activity as its N-acetylated (GalNAc) and alpha -methylated (alpha -Me-Gal) derivatives, but its beta -glycosides were significantly stronger inhibitors than galactose; i.e. Gal, GalNAc, alpha -Me-Gal beta -Me-Gal < beta -pAP-Gal. (ii) Among disaccharides, melibiose showed the same inhibitory power as lactose, but their N-acetyl derivatives, N-acetyllactosamine (type 2) and Galbeta 1,6GlcNAc as well as another linkage isomer, Galbeta 1,3GlcNAc (type 1), were still better inhibitors. Notably, similar inhibitory power was also observed for Galbeta 1,3GalNAc (T antigen). However, the non-reducing synthetic disaccharide thiodigalactoside (Galbeta 1-S-1beta Gal) was the best inhibitor among those tested. (iii) L-Fucosylation of lactose at either galactose (L-Fucalpha 1,2Galbeta 1,4Glc) or glucose moiety (Galbeta 1,4 (L-Fucalpha 1,3) Glc) reduced the activity by 1 order.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III
Saccharide specificity of purified earthworm 29-kDa lectin in hemagglutination inhibition

The above binding feature was common to galectins in some ways but significantly distinct in others (8). They were similar in showing (i) moderate affinity to lactose, (ii) significantly higher affinity to both N-acetyllactosamine (type 2) and its linkage isomer Galbeta 1,3GlcNAc (type 1), and (iii) the strongest affinity to thiodigalactoside among disaccharides. However, EW29 showed strong affinities for monosaccharides, particularly beta -Me-Gal and beta -pAP-Gal, whereas galectins never have such a preference. EW29 also showed a wider preference for disaccharides such as melibiose and Galbeta 1,3GalNAc, to which galectins in general do not bind. However, the latter is exceptionally well recognized by rat galectin-4 (23) and nematode 16-kDa galectin.2 Thus, EW29 is basically galactose-specific but seems to exhibit much wider preference for galactose-containing saccharides than galectins.

cDNA Cloning of EW29-- Based on the peptide sequences of EW29 (Lys4, Lys7, Lys8, and Lys9), four pairs of degenerate primers were synthesized (for their sequences, see Table IV). PCR was performed by using all combinations of these forward and reverse primers,, and genomic DNA was prepared from the earthworm as a template. A significant amplification product (155 bp) was obtained only when the combination of primers, Lys-4F and Lys-7R, was used (data not shown). The amplified fragment was cloned into pCRII, and the nucleotide sequence was determined. The deduced amino acid sequence was found to follow the sequence of Lys-4 (used as a forward primer) with no termination codon in frame and also included the determined sequence of Lys-3, "Asp-Val-Val-His-His-Arg-Asn-Asp-Lys" (data included in Fig. 5). This confirmed the derived fragment is relevant as a PCR product corresponding to EW29.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table IV
Oligonucleotide primers used in this study
Numbers in parentheses are nucleotide numbers. Underlines denote introduced mutations to make initiation codon ATG in 384F (Ch-5') and termination codon TTA (antisense) for 405R (Nh-3').


View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of EW29, clone 5. Solid lines with arrowheads represent the locations of gene-specific primers used for nucleotide sequencing (-1F, 247F, 360R, 354F, 405R, and 793R), and dotted lines with arrowheads represent degenerate primers used for the first genomic PCR (Lys-4F, Lys-7R). Initial "ATG" codon and termination codon "TAA" are double-overlined and double-underlined, respectively. Potential poly(A) addition signal "AATAAA" is wavy underlined. Dots above nucleotides denote substitution positions observed between the analyzed cDNA clones. Three amino acids, which are the result of "non-silent" substitutions, are shaded (see Table V for details).

Next, the above 155-bp PCR fragment was used as a probe to screen a lambda -ZAP cDNA library of the earthworm L. terrestris (kindly provided by Dr. T. Giebing, Düsseldorf). As a result of screening 3 × 105 plaques, 8 positive clones were obtained (designated clones 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 10), and their sequences were determined following conversion into plasmid Bluescript as described under "Experimental Procedures." We found the following. (i) Clones 5, 7, 8, and 9 were of full-length clones, all of which consisted of 261 codons including ATG (Met) initiation and TAA termination codons. (ii) Clones 1, 3, 5, and 10 contained identical sequences, but their lengths were different (non-full-length clones 1, 3 and 10 started with G48, C76, G16, respectively. Numbers begin at initiation codon A1TG). Clone 2 is almost identical to clone 5, but differed at two positions, i.e. CGC (clone 2)/CGA(clone 5) both encoding Arg225 and GTC (clone 2)/GTT (clone 5) encoding Val228. (iii) The remaining clones 7, 8, and 9 were apparently distinct. They differed from clone 5 at 12, 15, and 10 positions, respectively, in the coding region (sequence identities to clone 5: 98.5, 98.1, and 98.7%, respectively). All of these differences were only single nucleotide substitutions, and no deletion or insertion was observed. Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of clone 5, as a representative, is presented in Fig. 5. The sequences of clones 5, 7, 8, and 9 are also available with GenBankTM/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers AB010783, AB010784, AB010785, and AB010786, respectively.

Most of the above differences between clones were found at the third letter of codons (24 cases out of 29; see Table V). Even if they occurred at the first base (4 cases), 3 of them were retained to be silent, i.e. TTG (clones 5 and 8)/CTG (clones 7 and 9) encoding Leu17; AGA (clones 5, 7, and 8)/CGA (clone 9) encoding Arg51; and TTG (clone 5)/CTG (clones 7, 8, and 9) encoding Leu69. On the other hand, non-silent substitutions were found at only 3 positions, i.e. ATC (clones 5, 8, and 9)/GTC (clone 7) for Ile213/Val213; GCA (clones 5, 8, and 9)/GGA (clone 7) for Ala44/Gly44; and CAA (clones 5 and 7)/CAT (clones 8 and 9) for Gln197/His197. The amino acid substitutions were rather conservative. The resulting three polypeptides encoded by these four types of cDNA clones were as follows: Ala44-Gln197-Ile213 (encoded by clone 5), Gly44-Gln197-Val213 (clone 7), and Ala44-His197-Ile213 (both clones 8 and 9). Calculated molecular masses for these variants were 29,006, 28,978, and 29,015 Da, respectively. The values well agreed with those obtained by SDS-PAGE (29,000 Da). The nucleotide sequences did not contain any hydrophobic signal sequence for secretion or membrane integration, or any signal for N-linked oligosaccharide attachment (Asn-X-(Ser/Thr)). These characteristics apparently resemble those of galectins. The fact that 50% of the obtained cDNA clones (clones, 1, 3, 5, and 10) were identical suggests that the corresponding transcript is more abundant than the transcripts for the others (clones 7, 8, and 9).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table V
Summary of nucleotide substitutions found in cDNA and genomic clones for earthworm 29-kDa lectin
Substituted bases relative to clone 5 are bold for emphasis. Underlined codons correspond to underlined amino acids.

Two additional aspects should be mentioned. First, the lectin had no homology to galectins despite having many similar properties described above (solubility, metal independence, basic saccharide specificity, molecular size, absence of sugar chain, and signal sequence). Second, the lectin consisted of two homologous domains (14.5 kDa) having 27% amino acid identity (described in detail under "Discussion"). Homology was observed over the entire region of the 29-kDa polypeptide. However, similarity was more evident between the regions which encompassed the above-mentioned consensus motif Gly-X-X-X-Gln-X-Trp. In such regions, amino acid identities reached as high as 44%.

Single Worm Genomic PCR-- To clarify whether the polymorphism described above occurs at the species or individual level, we performed genomic PCR using DNA prepared from a single worm of L. terrestris. The entire coding region was amplified by using newly synthesized primers, Wh-F and Wh-R (Table IV), and the derived fragments (0.8 kilobase pairs) were analyzed after cloning into pCRII. As a result, all of the 9 genomic clones analyzed proved to be correlated to one of the four types of cDNA clones as follows: 1, 2, 3, and 3 genomic clones were assigned to cDNA clone 5, 7, 8, and 9, respectively. This result clearly demonstrates that the observed polymorphism already existed at the individual level.

Bacterial Expression of Recombinant Earthworm Lectins, Wh, Nh, and Ch-- To prove that the obtained cDNAs were derived from mRNAs for functional 29-kDa lectin, we chose one of the cDNAs (clone 5) for an expression experiment in E. coli. As expected, a 35-kDa protein (a fusion product with beta -galactosidase alpha -peptide) was produced and purified by affinity chromatography on asialofetuin-agarose (Fig. 6). However, many smaller fragments (15-17 kDa) were again observed, as in the case of natural proteins (Fig. 1). Since these small fragments were able to bind to the affinity column, they were considered to be either N-terminal or C-terminal domains that retained binding ability even after degradation. To confirm this, we transferred the small fragments that had been adsorbed to asialofetuin-agarose to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (indicated by a, b, c, and d in Fig. 6), and subjected them to direct sequence analysis. Partial N-terminal sequences suggested that the bands a, c, and d were C-terminal fragments beginning from Lys105, His127, and Lys132, respectively. Since all these positions were located in the connecting region between N-terminal and C-terminal domains, this result indicates that only the C-terminal domain retained binding activity. On the other hand, the band "b" did not give any significant amino acid peak even when a sufficient amount of protein was applied. It might be attributable to artificial N-terminal cyclization to form pyroglutamate, because many glutamine residues, i.e. Gln110, Gln122, and Gln123, are located in the connecting region.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Construction and production of recombinant whole EW29. A, the recombinant earthworm lectin was expressed as a fusion product with beta -galactosidase alpha -peptide in E. coli TOP10F' cells as described under "Experimental Procedures." B, E. coli cells were lysed by sonication, and the obtained extract was applied to an asialofetuin-agarose column (bed volume, 10 ml) equilibrated with EDTA-MEPBS. After extensive washing of the column, the bound protein was eluted with EDTA-MEPBS containing 20 mM lactose. C, the peak fraction of the eluted fractions were separated by SDS-PAGE, and the protein was stained with silver.

We further constructed expression plasmids for both individual N-terminal and C-terminal domains of EW29. Two mutant primers, 384F (Ch-5') and 405R (Nh-3'), were synthesized (Table IV). The individual N-half and C-half regions were expressed in E. coli, and their binding properties were tested. The C-terminal domain bound to the column (Fig. 7B) as stably as the whole molecule, whereas the N-terminal domain did not bind (data not shown). However, even in the latter case, elution from the asialofetuin-agarose column was significantly retarded (Fig. 7A). Therefore, we concluded that the C-terminal domain has stronger binding ability than the N-terminal domain, as far as asialofetuin-agarose was used, although the latter retains some affinity.


View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Functional analysis of individual N-terminal and C-terminal domains of EW29. On the basis of recombinant EW29 construct (Fig. 6), both individual domains (Nh and Ch) were produced. E. coli extracts were applied to an asialofetuin-agarose column, and both flow-through, retarded, and bound fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. A, the binding of Nh; there was no adsorption to the column, but the elution was strongly retarded. B, the binding of Ch; the adsorbed protein was eluted with 20 mM lactose from fraction 16.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

When we first chose tubifex (class Oligochaeta) for purification of galactose-binding proteins, multiple protein bands around 15-17 kDa together with a faint 31-kDa band were observed on SDS-PAGE after purification by asialofetuin-agarose chromatography. However, antiserum raised against this mixed fraction detected only the 31-kDa species in the lactose extract of tubifex (data not shown). This implied that the smaller fragments were degradation products generated by proteolysis during purification from the parental 31-kDa protein. This antiserum also detected approximately 30-kDa proteins in the lactose extracts prepared from other annelids, i.e. earthworm (Oligochaeta), lugworm (Polychaeta), and leech (Hirudinea).

During the course of this study, Cole and Zipser (24, 25) reported the presence of similar galactose-specific lectins, LL16, LL35, and LL63, from the leech Hemopis marmorata. LL16 and LL35 seem to have biochemical properties similar to those of the earthworm lectin investigated in the present study, i.e. in terms of molecular weight, metal independence for sugar binding, and specificity for simple saccharides. As they used detergent to extract leech lectins, it should have solubilized endogenous ligand glycoconjugates to which the lectins were bound. They also reported that LL16 and LL35 showed broader sugar binding specificity than LL63; binding of the former lectins to asialofetuin-agarose was inhibited by galactosamine and alpha -methylgalactoside as in the case of our preparation, whereas that of the latter was not inhibited by these saccharides. Since the reported molecular size (35 kDa) of LL35 was close to those of our annelid lectins (29-31 kDa), and specific antiserum raised against highly purified EW29 reacted significantly with LL35,3 we consider LL35 to be a leech homologue of the earthworm lectin. Galactose-binding lectins recently identified in N. japonica and Marphysa sanguinea (both belonging to Polychaeta; see Ref. 26) as well as Urechis unicinctus (belonging to Echiuroidae; see Ref. 27) may also represent couterpart molecules in these annelids.

Although these annelid lectins were prepared essentially by the same strategy as used for galectins, partial peptide analyses suggested that they are not related to galectins but form another protein family having the key consensus motif Gly-X-X-X-Gln-X-Trp. In fact, the earthworm lectin could be extracted with both galactose and melibiose as well as lactose, whereas galectins in general have only weak affinity to the former saccharides. Although we added beta -mercaptoethanol to the buffer for lectin extraction, it proved to be unimportant, because its removal did not significantly reduce the recovery or activity of the earthworm lectin.

The result of cDNA cloning of EW29 was striking in several aspects. First of all, the lectin proved not to be a member of the galectin family, contrary to our expectation. Moreover, the annelid lectins were suggested to be members of a larger family that includes many other carbohydrate-recognition proteins. At least two groups of proteins have been shown to contain the multiple short consensus motif Gly-X-X-X-Gln-X-Trp (Fig. 8). The first group consists of hemagglutinins (29-35 kDa) including EW29 investigated in this work and HA33 (a 33-kDa major component of hemagglutinin from C. botulinum type C; see Ref. 28) as well as the B-chain of a series of plant toxins. A number of plant toxins consisting of A-chain (ribosome-inactivating protein) and B-chain (lectin) have been reported, e.g. ricin (or RCA60; see Ref. 29), agglutinin (or RCA120; see Ref. 30) from Ricinus communis and their related homologues in elderberry (Sambucus sieboldina), S. sieboldina agglutinin (31), and sieboldin-b (32). Modeccin (33), abrin (34), and viscumin (35) are also this type of toxin found in other plants. The second group consists of various hydrolytic enzymes (see Fig. 8): (i) glycosidases Oerskovia xanthineolytica beta -1,3-glucanase (36) and Streptomyces lividans xylanase A (37), and (ii) proteases Rarobacter faecitabitus protease I (38) and alpha  subunit of horseshoe crab coagulation factor G (beta  subunit is a serine protease; see Ref. 39). Notably, all members of the lectin group are known to be specific for galactose/N-acetylgalactosamine except for S. sieboldina agglutinin. Since S. sieboldina agglutinin binds to sialic acid that is alpha 2,6-linked to galactose (Siaalpha 2,6Gal), it may be a variant having deviated from an ancestral galactose-specific protein. All of these members including EW29 consist of two homologous domains (14-16 kDa), both of which retain carbohydrate binding activity as far as examined. This fact implies that acquirement of multivalency is critical for preservation of efficient lectin function(s). On the other hand, carbohydrate-binding properties are not known for most of the enzyme group. As a sole exception, the CRD of R. faecitabitus protease I has been shown to have mannose binding activity (38). The possibility is excluded that EW29 exists as a larger conjugate via disulfide bridge(s) like ricin and coagulation factor, because Western blotting detected only the 29-kDa species even when beta -mercaptoethanol was omitted throughout the experiment.


View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Putative superfamily consisting of carbohydrate-recognition proteins having Gly-X-X-X-Gln-X-Trp motif. A, domain structures of proteins having the consensus motif. The members are classified into Lectin group and Enzyme group. For details, see text. Two consecutive consensus motifs are expressed by thick vertical lines in each unit segment, which consists of 40-50 amino acids. Thin vertical lines in the structures signify assumed boundary regions between the domains. B, alignment of amino acid sequences of the members having the consensus motif. Gly (G), Gln (Q), and Trp (W) contained in the consensus motif are emphasized by white letters on black background. Relatively conserved amino acids between the sequences are shaded. One or two consensus amino acids at each of the several conservative positions are depicted above the sequences. Several amino acids, which form the two galactose-binding domains of ricin (40), are shown in inverted boldface; i.e. Asp22, Gln35, Trp37, Lys40 and Asn46 in the N-terminal CRD, and Asp234, Asn255, and Tyr248, in the C-terminal CRD, respectively.

X-ray crystallographic study has been carried out for ricin complexed with lactose (40). As described, the ricin B-chain has two galactose-binding sites corresponding to the two homologous domains. Amino acid residues forming the binding sites are as follows: Asp22, Gln35, Trp37, Lys40, and Asn46 for N-terminal CRD, and Asp234, Asn255, and Tyr248 (shown as inverted boldface letters in Fig. 8B). These residues are mapped to the first repeat segment of the N-terminal CRD and to the third one of the C-terminal CRD, respectively. Inclusion of tryptophan (or tyrosine) residues at the seventh position of the consensus motif is also intriguing, because such aromatic residues are frequently found in carbohydrate-recognition sites of various sugar-binding proteins, particularly in galactose-specific lectins (41, 42).

Although total amino acid identities between these carbohydrate-recognition proteins were low (<10%), it is noteworthy that these CRDs had striking similarity in their segment architecture; all of the CRDs consisted of three segments each consisting of 40-50 amino acids (5 kDa) and containing 2 consensus motifs in the latter positions. Since the segment size agrees with a moderate "exon" size (43, 44), it is possible to speculate that the original CRD (15 kDa) was the result of several gene duplication events of this ancestral peptide, or "module," which is presumed to have had primitive carbohydrate binding activity. According to this scenario, one group of the descendants might have evolved as "lectins" (30 kDa) by acquiring divalency by further duplication of the 15-kDa CRD, whereas the other group might have evolved to "enzymes" by ligation with some peptides having catalytic domain(s). Their CRDs could have been useful, e.g. for facilitated binding to target cells covered by carbohydrate chains, as has been suggested for R. faecitabitus protease I (38). X-ray crystallography studies should support this hypothesis. "Ricin superfamily" or "R-type" lectin (where R indicates for ricin and repeat) seem to be appropriate as the name for this novel superfamily.

The present results on cDNA (genome) cloning showed that EW29 is encoded by multiple genes, i.e. genome polymorphism. The analyzed 8 cDNA and 9 genomic clones completely overlapped except for cDNA clone 2 (Table V), which differed from the major cDNA type (clones 1, 3, 5, and 10) at only two positions. Therefore, the actual number of EW29 genes in a single worm would not seem to far exceed four (i.e. the four types represented by cDNA clones 5, 7, 8 and 9; or genomic clones 1, 5, 2, and 3, respectively; see Table V). Difference among the four types of genes (transcripts) spans over the whole coding region at 29 positions, although most of them (26 cases) were silent substitutions. Even for the non-silent substitutions, they were rather homologous ones, and therefore, the generated three polypeptides would not be expected to show very different properties, although their stability or fine sugar-binding specificity might be different. In this regard, three closely similar bands detected by anti-tubifex antibody in the extraction experiment (Fig. 3) might represent these three polypeptides. On the other hand, the fact that half of the obtained cDNA clones were identical to clone 5 suggests that the corresponding gene is more strongly expressed than other genes (corresponding to cDNA clones 7, 8, and 9). Apparently, further functional studies are necessary to evaluate these variant genes.

The physiological function(s) of the investigated annelid lectins is not known. However, based on the observation that LL35 is localized in leech photoreceptors in sensory afferents, Zipser and colleagues (45) speculated that the lectin has some function in the axon targeting in the central nervous system of this organism. At the moment, it is not known whether the earthworm and other annelids have galectins or not. However, if they do, such galectins would not seem to be dominant with respect to the investigated lectins. In this context, the hypothesis described under the Introduction has again emerged that absence of galectins in some invertebrate phyla can be compensated by similar but distinct types of galactose-binding lectins. Inversely, it is of interest to note that no homologues to the investigated annelid lectins have been reported so far in vertebrates and nematodes, in which galectins are dominant. Alternatively, galectins do exist in almost all animal species but cannot be extracted with simple saccharides such as lactose, as has been demonstrated in some tandem repeat-type galectins (46, 47). In any case, the present study has shown the occurrence of relatively abundant, novel galactose-binding lectins in the phylum Annelida. Our results add further evidence of the ubiquitous occurrence of galactose-binding proteins in multicellular organisms and thus evidence for fundamental importance of "galactose recognition."

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. T. Giebing (Düsserdorf) for kindly providing us with a cDNA library for the earthworm L. terrestris; Yasuhiro Arai, Sachiko Yamamoto, and Ko Hayama for their technical assistance. Fusako Honda and Ai Hirabayashi are also acknowledged for their collaboration in the worm collection.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by Grant 05274101 from the program for Scientific Research on Priority Areas (05274101) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Culture and Sports, Japan, and by grants from the Naito Foundation, Mitsubishi Foundation, and Kato Memorial Foundation.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-426-85-3741; Fax: 81-426-85-3742; E-mail: j-hira{at}pharm.teikyo-u.ac.jp.

§ Recipient of a Japan Society for the Promotion of Science fellowship. Present address: Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, 4, Raja S.C. Mullick Rd., Calcutta, India 700 032.

1 The abbreviations used are: EW29, earthworm 29-kDa lectin; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; CRD, carbohydrate-recognition domain; bp, base pair; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.

2 H. Ahmed, et al., unpublished observations.

3 A. Chapman and B. Zipser, personal communication.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Doyle, R. J. (1994) in Lectin-Microorganism Interactions (Doyle, R. J., and Slifkin, M., eds), pp. 1-65, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York
  2. Speck, J. G., Jr. (1958) Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. 13, 63-103
  3. Moremane, K. W., Trimble, R. B., and Herscovics, A. (1994) Glycobiology 4, 113-125[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Trimble, R. B., and Verostek, M. F. (1995) Trends Glycosci. Glycotechnol. 7, 1-30
  5. Hirabayashi, J. (1996) Q. Rev. Biol. 71, 365-380[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Hakomori, S. (1992) Histochem. J. 24, 771-776[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Kasai, K., and Hirabayashi, J. (1996) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 119, 1-8[Abstract]
  8. Barondes, S. H., Cooper, D. N. W., Gitt, M., and Leffler, H. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 20807-20810[Free Full Text]
  9. Hirabayashi, J. (1997) Trends Glycosci. Glycotechnol. 9, No. 45
  10. Hirabayashi, J., Satoh, M., and Kasai, K. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 15485-15490[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Klion, A. D., and Donelson, J. E. (1994) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 65, 305-315[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Hirabayashi, J., Ubukata, T., and Kasai, K. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 2497-2505[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Newton, S. E., Monti, J. R., Greenhalgh, C. J., Ashman, K., and Meeusen, E. N. T. (1997) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 86, 143-153[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Pfeifer, K., Haasemann, M., Gamulin, V., Bretting, H., Fahrenholz, F., and Muller, W. E. G. (1993) Glycobiology 3, 179-184[Abstract]
  15. Cooper, D. N. W., Boulianne, R. P., Charlton, S., Farrell, E. M., Sucher, A., and Lu, B. C. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 1514-1521[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Hirabayashi, J., and Kasai, K. (1984) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 122, 938-944[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Hirabayashi, J., Kawasaki, H., Suzuki, K., and Kasai, K. (1987) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 101, 775-787[Abstract]
  18. de Waard, A., Hickman, S., and Kornfeld, S. (1976) J. Biol. Chem. 251, 7581-7587[Abstract]
  19. Nowak, T. P., Haywood, P. L., and Barondes, S. H. (1976) Bichem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 69, 650-657
  20. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  21. Hirabayashi, J., Sakakura, Y., and Kasai, K. (1993) in Lectins and Glycobiology (Gabius, H.-J., ed), pp. 474-481, Springer-Verlag, Berlin
  22. Hughes, R. C. (1994) Glycobiology 4, 5-12[Abstract]
  23. Oda, Y., Herrmann, J., Gitt, M. A., Turck, C. W., Burlingame, A. L., Barondes, S. H., and Leffler, H. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 5929-5939[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Cole, R. N., and Zipser, B. (1994) J. Neurochem. 63, 66-74[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Cole, R. N., and Zipser, B. (1994) J. Neurochem. 63, 75-85[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Ozeki, Y., Tazawa, E., and Matsui, T. (1997) Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 118, 1-6[CrossRef]
  27. Matsui, T. (1984) Biol. Bull. 166, 178-188
  28. Tsuzuki, K., Kimura, K., Fujii, N., Yokosawa, N., Undoh, T., Murakami, T., and Oguma, K. (1990) Infect. Immun. 58, 3173-3177[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Lamb, F. I., Roberts, L. M., and Lord, J. M. (1985) Eur. J. Biochem. 148, 265-270[Abstract]
  30. Roberts, L. M., Lamb, F. I., Pappin, D. J., and Lord, J. M. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 15682-15686[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Kaku, H., Tanaka, Y., Tazaki, K., Minami, E., Mizuno, H., and Shibuya, N. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 1480-1485[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Rojo, M. A., Yato, M., Ishii-Minami, N., Minami, E., Kaku, H., Citores, L., Girbes, T., and Shibuya, N. (1997) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 340, 185-194[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Ready, M., Wilson, K., Piatak, M., and Robertus, J. D. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 15252-15256[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Wood, K. A., Lord, J. M., Wawrxynczak, E. J., and Piatak, M. (1991) Eur. J. Biochem. 198, 723-732[Abstract]
  35. Gabius, H. J., Walzel, H., Joshi, S. S., Kruip, J., Kojima, S., Gerke, V., Kratzin, H., and Gabius, S. (1992) Anticancer Res. 12, 669-675[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Shen, S.-H., Chretien, P., Bastien, L., and Slilaty, S. N. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 1058-1063[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Shareck, F., Roy, C., Yaguchi, M., Morosoli, R., and Kluepfel, D. (1991) Gene (Amst.) 107, 75-82[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Shimoi, H., Iimura, Y., Obata, T., and Tadenuma, M. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 25189-25195[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Seki, N., Muta, T., Oda, T., Iwaki, D., Kuma, K., Miyata, T., and Iwanaga, S. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 1370-1374[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Montfort, W., Villafranca, J. E., Monzingo, A. F., Ernst, S. R., Katzin, B., Rutenber, E., Xuong, N. H., Hamlin, R., and Robertus, J. D. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 5398-5403[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Rini, J. M. (1995) Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 24, 551-577[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Kolatkar, A., and Weis, W. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 6679-6685[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Go, M. (1981) Nature 291, 90-92[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Blake, C. (1983) Nature 306, 535-537[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Tai, M.-H., Bheuben, M. B., Autio, D. M., and Zipser, B. (1996) J. Comp. Neurobiol. 371, 235-248[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Arata, Y., Akimoto, Y., Hirabayashi, J., Kasai, K., and Hirano, H. (1996) Histochem. J. 28, 201-207[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Chiu, M. L., Jones, J. C. R., and O'Keefe, E. J. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 119, 1689-1700[Abstract]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.