COMMUNICATION
Nuclear Factor I Regulates Expression of the Gene for Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxykinase (GTP)*

Deborah R. CrawfordDagger §, Patrick LeahyDagger §, Ching Y. Hu, Ali Chaudhryparallel , Richard Gronostajskiparallel , Gregory Grossman, Jason Woods, Parvin Hakimi, William J. Roesler**, and Richard W. HansonDagger Dagger

From the Department of Biochemistry, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-4935, the parallel  Department of Cancer Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, and the ** Department of Biochemistry, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5E5, Canada

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

Nuclear factor-I (NFI) binds to the phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (GTP) (PEPCK) gene promoter immediately 5' to the cAMP regulatory element (CRE). This suggests an interaction between NFI and factors that bind the CRE. Of the four NFI isoforms expressed in mammalian tissues, NFI-A and -B stimulate basal transcription from the PEPCK gene promoter in HepG2 cells, while NFI-C and -X are slightly inhibitory. All four NFI isoforms abrogate the 20-fold protein kinase Ac (PKAc)-mediated induction of transcription from the PEPCK gene promoter. Normal PKAc-mediated induction was noted when the CRE was moved 10 base pairs 3' of its original location. However if the CRE was moved 5 base pairs 3', placing it out of phase with the other elements in the promoter, or moved 5' to -285 (the P3(I) site in the promoter), some PKA-mediated stimulation was lost. The NFI-C isoform effectively inhibited PKAc induction regardless of the relative positions of the CRE and the NFI binding sites. NFI-C also abrogated cAMP regulatory element-binding protein (CREB)-induced activity of wild type and mutant PEPCK promoters. There was some cooperativity in the binding of CREB and NFI to their respective binding sites but this did not appear to be physiologically important.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (GTP) (EC 4.1.1.32) (PEPCK)1 is a key enzyme in hepatic and renal gluconeogenesis, whose activity is tightly regulated at the transcriptional level. A number of transcription factors have been identified that interact with the PEPCK gene promoter to control expression (1). Among these is the NFI family of site-specific DNA-binding proteins (2). The consensus sequence, TTGGC(N)5GCCAA, to which NFI binds (2-4) is present on the PEPCK promoter (P1 site) immediately adjacent to a cAMP response element. The latter is important for both basal and cAMP-induced transcription (5) (Fig. 1). Purified NFI binds the P1 site of the PEPCK gene promoter (6). Since all four NFI genes are expressed at high levels in liver (7, 8) where PEPCK is also strongly expressed, it seemed likely that NFI would play a role in the regulation of PEPCK expression.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   A representation of the PEPCK gene promoter showing the location of pertinent cis-acting elements and transcription factors which bind to these sites.

The proximity of the P1 and CRE sites in the PEPCK gene promoter raises the possibility of interactions between the NFI isoforms and protein(s) that bind the CRE. NFI isoforms have been implicated as co-factors necessary for the full transcriptional response of genes to various stimuli (9). NFI is also involved in glucocorticoid receptor-mediated transcriptional response of the gene for mouse mammary tumor virus (10) and aspartate aminotransferase (11). In addition, NFI has been suggested as a negative modulator of transcription of the gene for L-type pyruvate kinase (12). Footprint analysis of the PEPCK gene promoter has shown that both the P1 and CRE sites on the endogenous PEPCK gene were occupied under conditions of basal gene expression (13, 14). Christ et al. (15) reported that an oligonucleotide containing the NFI binding site from the rat PEPCK gene promoter bound greater amounts of protein from rat liver nuclear extracts when the site was placed in context next to the CRE, suggesting that the CRE is involved in recruiting proteins to the NFI binding site. In the present study, we report the effects of individual NFI isoforms on basal and PKAc-induced transcription from the PEPCK gene promoter and examine the issue of position sensitivity of the P1 and CRE sites.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

Materials

[3H]Chloramphenicol (30-60 Ci/mmol) and [32P]dCTP (3000 Ci/mmol) were purchased from NEN Life Science Products. 8-Bromo-cAMP and butyryl coenzyme A were purchased from Sigma. HepG2 cells were originally purchased from ATCC (Rockville, MD). The expression vector for catalytic subunit of protein kinase A was a gift from Dr. Masa-Aki Muramatsu. DMEM/F-12 cell culture medium and fetal calf serum were from Life Technologies , Inc. All other reagents used in this study were of the highest quality obtainable. CREB was partially purified from a crude lysate of Escherichia coli; the CREB expression vector was a kind gift of Dr. Marc R. Montminy. All expression vectors for the NFI proteins were the same as those used in a earlier study (8).

Methods

Construction of Chimeric Genes-- The details of the construction of the chimeric PEPCK-CAT genes used in the transfections experiments (CRE2CAT, CRE3CAT, and CRE2+3CAT) were outlined previously (16). Block mutations were introduced into the PEPCK gene promoter as described by Liu et al. (5). C0.5CAT and C1.0CAT contained the following modified promoter regions respectively: CRE0.5CAT, -100-GGCCGGCCCCAGGCCTTACGTCAGAGCCTCCAGGTCCAGCT--60; CRE1.0CAT, -100-GGCCGGCCCCTGCATGAGGCCTTACGTCACCAGGTCCAGCT--60.

Cell Culture-- HepG2 human hepatoma cells were purchased from the ATCC and grown in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium, supplemented with 50% F-12 nutrient mixture (DMEM/F-12 and 10% fetal calf serum). Cells were allowed to grow to 30-40% confluence prior to DNA transfection.

Assay of Transcription from the PEPCK Gene Promoter-- Chimeric genes containing the PEPCK gene promoter, modified as described above, were transfected into HepG2 cells using calcium phosphate as described previously (5). Three replicate 100-mm plates of 30-40% confluent HepG2 cells were transfected with 2.5 µg of 490-CAT. Other plasmids were co-transfected into HepG2 cells as indicated under "Results." Control cells were transfected with buffer alone. The cells were given fresh medium at 24 h, harvested at 48 h, and assayed for CAT activity as described in an earlier study (17, 18). Differences between means were analyzed using Student's t test (one-tailed).

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Analysis-- A 64-base pair oligonucleotide that contained both the P1 and CRE sites was constructed. Using electrophoretic mobility shift analysis, we tested whether NFI-C, partially purified from an E. coli lysate, could bind this fragment and affect the subsequent binding of CREB and vice versa. The details of the DNA binding assay have been described previously (16). The oligonucleotide-protein complexes were separated by electrophoresis using 6% Tris borate EDTA, pH 8.3, polyacrylamide gel (60 V) at 4 °C. The gels were dried at 80 °C for 2 h, exposed to film, and the radioactivity visualized and quantitated using a PhosphorImager.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

An important role for NFI in the control of PEPCK gene transcription can be inferred from the experiments of Patel et al. (19). They demonstrated that a mutation of the NFI binding site in a PEPCK transgene promoter lead to increased levels of basal transcription from the promoter in the livers of transgenic mice. In utero abnormalities such as premature expression of the transgene and loss of the normal cAMP-mediated capability for stimulation of expression were also observed. In another study, mice carrying a mutated NFI site in a PEPCK transgene promoter showed a marked increase in the basal hepatic expression of the transgene in response to hypoxia.2 Taken together, these findings suggest that NFI plays a key role in maintaining a low level of basal expression of the PEPCK gene. A similar role for NFI has been propsed for the liver-type pyruvate kinase (12). NFI may thus be critical for maintaining low levels of PEPCK to ensure that there is control of glucose overproduction by the liver.

To determine the effect of NFI on PEPCK gene transcription, we tested the ability of the four isoforms of NFI to alter the basal and cAMP-stimulated transcription from the PEPCK gene promoter (-490 to +73) linked to the CAT structural gene in HepG2 cells. The various isoforms of NFI had different effects on transcription from the PEPCK gene promoter (Fig. 2). NFI-A and NFI-B stimulated basal transcription 6- and 4-fold, respectively, while NFI-C and NFI-X had no effect or caused a slight inhibition. All four NFI isoforms abrogated the normally robust (20-40-fold) induction of transcription from the PEPCK gene promoter caused by PKAc. NFI-C and NFI-X totally inhibited induction of transcription to levels below basal, while NFI-A and NFI-B reduced transcription to approximately the levels noted when the these two isoforms were co-transfected in the absence of PKAc. The effect of NFI on PKAc induced transcription from the PEPCK gene promoter was not caused by NFI inhibition of the expression of CMV-PKAc gene, since the same pattern of effect of NFI-C on transcription from the PEPCK promoter was noted when 8-bromo-cAMP was added directly to the medium (Fig. 2, inset). Thus, NFI isoforms have a dominant negative effect on cAMP induction of transcription from the PEPCK gene promoter and NFI can set the overall level of expression despite the presence of cAMP, a powerful stimulus of PEPCK gene transcription.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   The effects of the four isoforms of NFI on cAMP-induced transcription from the PEPCK gene promoter. HepG2 cells were co-transfected with expression vectors for 490-CAT, PKAc, and the individual NFI isoforms. The cells were harvested 48 h later, lysed, and the lysates assayed for CAT activity as described under "Methods." Inset, the effect of NFI-C on the induction of transcription from the PEPCK gene promoter by 1 mM 8-bromo-cAMP. HepG2 cells were co-transfected with expression vectors for 490-CAT and NFI-C and harvested 48 h later. 8-Bromo-cAMP was added to the medium 12-16 h before harvesting, and the cells were processed as described above. All values for CAT activity were normalized for protein content and expressed as the mean ± S.E. of the mean for two to three replicates.

The functional significance of the difference in the effects of the various isoforms of NFI on basal transcription from the PEPCK gene promoter is not clear. RNA for each of the four vertebrate genes for NFI are differentially spliced to yield 18 distinct isoforms, many of which exhibit a unique species distribution (2, 4, 20). Chaudhry et al. (8) have studied the pattern of expression of the isoforms of NFI and found that all four of the forms are highly expressed in the liver, whereas NFI-C is most highly expressed in the kidney. The pattern of embryonic expression of the various isoforms of NFI is more complex. NFI-A is expressed earliest during fetal development of the heart (at 9 days of fetal life). In the developing liver, where PEPCK gene expression is greatest after birth, the levels of NFI-C and NFI-X are highest during fetal life; NFI-A and NFI-B are not detected in the liver in utero (8). Both NFI-C and NFI-X strongly inhibit cAMP induction of PEPCK gene transcription, which may explain why Patel et al. (19) observed premature expression of the gene for PEPCK in the livers of mice with a transgene in which the NFI binding site had been deleted. However, the physiological effects of the interactions of the various forms of NFI remain to be elucidated.

A number of other genes have promoters in which the NFI binding site and a CRE or a glucocorticoid regulatory element (GRE) are juxtaposed. The NFI site and the CRE in the human neurotropic JC virus early promoter have been shown to function independently of each other in controlling transcription in a tissue-specific manner (21). In addition, a close association between NFI and AP-1 proteins (Fos and Jun) has been demonstrated for the JC virus early promoter (22). The promoters of the genes for cytosolic form of aspartate aminotransferase (11) and for the long terminal repeat of the mouse mammary tumor virus (23) have glucocorticoid regulatory elements in close proximity to an NFI binding domain. A mutation in the NFI site of the aspartate aminotransferase gene promoter markedly decreases the level of basal gene transcription but permits glucocorticoid induction of transcription from the promoter in HepG2 cells. There is also evidence that the NF1 site is required for PEPCK gene transcription in hepatoma cells (24). In all of the above studies the differential effect of the various isoforms of NFI on the transcription of the specific gene of interest was not determined so that functional variations of the isoforms of NFI on gene expression noted with the PEPCK gene promoter could be a more general phenomenon.

To explore whether any cooperative-type interaction existed between NFI-C and CREB, we carried out a electrophoretic gel mobility experiment in which a 63-base pair oligonucleotide, containing both CRE and NFI sites, was used as a probe to study the relative binding of purified CREB and NFI-C (Fig. 3). Lane 5 shows the bands shifted by a reaction which had three times the concentration of NFI relative to a standard concentration of CREB. The formation of the ternary complex should be limited by the protein in shortest supply. Therefore, we expected to see an increase in the band corresponding to NFI and no change in the bands for CREB or the band representing the ternary complex (when compared with lane 6). Clearly, the band representing the ternary complex was also increased in the presence of an increased concentration of NFI-C, suggesting that NFI recruited extra CREB, which bound to the DNA. A reciprocal effect may be inferred from the results shown in lane 4 where increased amounts of CREB in the reaction led not only to an increase in the CREB-shift but also to an increase in the band representing the ternary complex (compare lane 4 with lane 6). As a control, we demonstrated that the individual and ternary complex may be effectively removed by competition with unlabeled oligonucleotide corresponding to either the CRE (lane 1) or NFI (lane 2). In another gel shift assay, CREB was incubated with with a 32P-labeled oligonucleotide containing the CRE site only which resulted in a single band shift. When NFI was added to the incubation mixture, no ternary complex was observed (data not shown). This suggests that there is no direct interaction between CREB and NFI. These results suggest that the apparent interaction between NFI and CREB is likely to be some form of facilitated DNA binding. Previously, Lu et al. (25) had demonstrated co-operative binding between an "NFI-like" protein and "CRE binding factor" to a 52-base pair oligonucleotide containing the CRE and "URE" (i.e. an NFI consensus sequence) of the PEPCK gene promoter.


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Electrophoretic mobility-shift analysis of the interaction of CREB and NFI-C with the PEPCK gene promoter. CREB and NFI-C were expressed in E. coli, partially purified, and resuspended in 1 × Dignam buffer. Lane 11, unbound probe. Lanes 9 and 10, CREB-induced shifts. Lanes 7 and 8, NFI-C-induced shifts in the presence and absence of 1 µg/µl BSA, respectively. Lanes 3 and 6, equal volumes of NFI-C and CREB were incubated with the labeled oligonucleotide. Lanes 4 and 5, shifts induced by the indicated amounts of CREB and NFI-C. Lanes 1 and 2, controls, showing that the individual and ternary complex may be effectively removed by competition with unlabeled oligonucleotide corresponding to the CRE and NFI sites, respectively.

To investigate whether the proximity of the NF-1 and CRE sites in the PEPCK promoter had functional significance, we constructed a number of mutant variants of the PEPCK gene promoter in which the physical relationship between the NFI and CRE sites were altered. The location of the CRE was moved by introducing a block mutation to the CRE site and moving the CRE consensus sequence elsewhere. In cre2CAT, for instance, the original CRE was replaced by a block mutation and a new CRE was introduced to the "cre" site which hitherto contained an imperfect CRE (see Fig. 1), while in the plasmid CRE3CAT the original CRE was replaced by block mutation and a new one constructed in the P3(I) site. In CRE2+3CAT, the original CRE was removed and two new ones constructed at the cre2 and P3 sites. In CRE0.5CAT and CRE1.0CAT the original CRE had been removed and new ones introduced 5 and 11 bases closer to the TATA box, respectively. In the case of C0.5, the 5-base shift to 3' also involved a 90°-degree shift in rotation of the CRE around the long axis of the double helix. These mutant CAT reporter genes were co-transfected into HepG2 cells along with NFI-C in the presence and absence of PKAc (Fig. 4). Basal and PKAc-induced activity were coordinately and adversely affected in the CRE3 and CRE1.0 mutants as compared with the native promoter; there was no difference noted with the CRE2+3 and CRE0.5CAT mutations in the PEPCK gene promoter. However, the PKAc-induced activity was totally inhibited by NFI-C in all of the PEPCK gene promoter mutations tested. In similar experiments, we show that co-transfection of an expression vector for CREB produced uniform amounts of induction from the 490CAT, CRE0.5CAT, and CRE1.0CAT. NFI-C blocked the induction of transcription by CREB to the same degree (data not shown) with all of the above constructs, suggesting that proximity of the CRE and NFI sites is not important for function and that direct interaction between CREB and NFI is unlikely.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   The effect of altering the relative locations of the NFI and CRE sites on trranscription by the PEPCK gene promoter. A series of mutant CAT reporter genes were constructed that contained block mutations in the CRE, or new CREs were created in different positions on the PEPCK gene promoter. To determine whether NFI-C could block PKAc induced activity, the genes containing the mutated PEPCK gene promoter were co-transfected with PKAc and NFI-C. Cells were harvested 48 h later and assayed for CAT activity as described above. All values for CAT activity were normalized for protein content and expressed as the mean ± S.E. of the mean for two to three replicates.

The results of these studies are surprising since they indicate that there is no position sensitivity associated with the proximity of location of the CRE and NFI binding sites on the PEPCK gene promoter. The mouse mammary tumor virus long terminal repeat (23) and the promoter for the estrogen-inducible vitellogenin gene (26) both contain an NFI binding site and mutations in this site alters steroid induction of gene transcription. Allgood et al. (10) have demonstrated, using an artificial promoter containing GRE and NFI sites, that a there is no strict position or orientation requirements for cooperation between the NFI and GRE in glucocorticoid induction of transcription from the promoter. Since the NFI site in the PEPCK gene promoter is maintained in its original position in our experiments, it is probable that NFI either interacts with the TATA box-binding proteins or with a protein important in integrating the effects transcriptional control proteins, such as CBP/p300; the latter is involved in the control of transcription from the PEPCK promoter.3 In this regard, NFI is similar to the adenoviral early protein E1A, which totally blocks both basal and cAMP-induced transcription from the PEPCK gene promoter (27). The profound similarities of the effects of these two proteins and the major binding events resulting from the action of the NFI isoforms on transcription from the PEPCK gene promoter are currently being studied.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We are indebted to Dr. David Samols for his helpful discussions during the course of this work.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Grants DK-22465 (to R. W. H.) and HD-34908 (to R. G.) from the National Institutes of Health and by a grant from the Medical Research Council of Canada (to W. J. R.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger These authors contributed equally to the work contained in this manuscript and may be considered co-first authors.

§ Trainees of the Metabolism Training Grant from National Institutes of Health Grant DK 07319.

Present address: Dept. of Animal Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331.

Dagger Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106-4935. Tel.: 216-368-5302; Fax: 216-368-4544; E-mail rwh{at}po.cwru.edu.

1 The abbreviations used are: PEPCK, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase; GRE, glucocorticoid regulatory element; CBP, CREB-binding protein; NFI, nuclear factor-I; CRE, cAMP regulatory element; PKA, protein kinase A; PKAc, protein kinase A catalytic subunit; CREB, cAMP regulatory element-binding protein; URE, upstream regulatory element; DMEM, Dulbecco's minimal essential medium; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase.

2 T. Riley, S. Kalhan, and R. W. Hanson, unpublished results.

3 P. Leahy and R. W. Hanson, unpublished data.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

  1. Hanson, R. W., and Patel, Y. M. (1994) P-Enolpyruvate Carboxykinase: The Gene and the Enzyme, Vol. 69, pp. 203-281, John Wiley and Sons, New York
  2. Santoro, C., Mermod, N., Andrews, P. C., and Tjian, R. (1988) Nature 334, 218-224[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Mermod, N., O'Neill, E., Kelly, T., and Tjian, R. (1989) Cell 58, 741-753[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Meisterernst, M., Rogge, L., Foeckler, R., Karaghiosoff, M., and Winnacker, E.-L. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 8191-8200[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Liu, J., Park, E. A., Gurney, A. L., Roesler, W. J., and Hanson, R. W. (1991) J. Biol. Chem 266, 19095-19102[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Roesler, W. J., Vandenbark, G. R., and Hanson, R. W. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 9657-9664[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Cereghini, S., Raymondjean, M., Carranca, A. G., Herbomel, P., and Yaniv, M. (1987) Cell 50, 627-638[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Chaudhry, A. Z., Lyons, G. E., and Gronostajski, R. M. (1997) Dev. Dyn. 208, 313-325[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Jackson, D. A., Rowader, K. E., Stevens, K., Jiang, C., Milos, P., and Zaret, K. S. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 2401-2410[Abstract]
  10. Allgood, V. E., Oakley, R. H., and Cidlowski, J. A. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 20870-20876[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Garlatti, M., Aggerbeck, M., Bouguet, J., and Barouki, R. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 32629-32634[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Cuif, M.-H., Poteu, A., Kahn, A., and Vaulont, S. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 13769-13772[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Faber, S., Ip, T., Granner, D. K., and Chalkley, R. (1991) Nucliec Acid Res. 19, 4681-4688
  14. Faber, S., O'Brien, R. M., Imai, E., Granner, D. K., and Chalkley, R. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 24976-24985[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Christ, B., Nath, A., and Jungermann, K. (1991) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 181, 367-374[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Park, E. A., Gurney, A. L., Nizielski, S. E., Hakimi, P., Coa, Z., Moorman, A., and Hanson, R. W. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 613-619[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Leahy, P., Carmichael, G. C., and Rossomando, E. F. (1995) BioTechniques 19, 894-898[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Mandel, H. G. (1995) Anal. Biochem. 230, 191-193[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Patel, Y. M., Yun, J. S., Liu, J., McGrane, M. M., and Hanson, R. W. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 5619-5628[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Rupp, R., Kruse, U., Multhaiup, G., Gobel, U., Beyreuther, K., and Sippel, A. (1990) Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 2607-2616[Abstract]
  21. Kumar, K. U., Tang, S.-C., Pater, M. M., and Pater, A. (1996) J. Med. Virol. 49, 199-204[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Amemiya, K., Traub, R., Durham, L., and Major, E. O. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 14204-14211[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Mink, S., Hartig, E., Jennewein, P., Doppler, W., and Cato, A. C. B. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 4906-4918[Abstract]
  24. Park, E. A., Gurney, A. L., Nizielski, S. E., Hakimi, P., Cao, Z., Moorman, A., and Hanson, R. W. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 613-619[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Lu, G., Schlichter, D., and Wicks, W. D. (1992) Int. J. Biochem. 24, 455-464[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Corthesy, B., Cardinaux, J. R., Claret, F. X., and Wahli, W. (1989) Mol. Cell. Biol. 9, 5548-5562[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Kalvakalanu, D. V. R., Liu, J., Hanson, R. W., Harter, M. L., and Sen, G. C. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 2530-2536[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.