Characterization of the Cytoprotective Action of Peroxynitrite Decomposition Catalysts*

Thomas P. MiskoDagger §, Maureen K. HighkinDagger , Amy W. VeenhuizenDagger , Pamela T. ManningDagger , Michael K. Stern, Mark G. CurrieDagger , and Daniela SalveminiDagger

From the Dagger  Discovery Pharmacology, G. D. Searle, and  Monsanto Corporate Research, St. Louis, Missouri 63167

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

The formation of the powerful oxidant peroxynitrite (PN) from the reaction of superoxide anion with nitric oxide has been shown to be a kinetically favored reaction contributing to cellular injury and death at sites of tissue inflammation. The PN molecule is highly reactive causing lipid peroxidation as well as nitration of both free and protein-bound tyrosine. We present evidence for the pharmacological manipulation of PN with decomposition catalysts capable of converting it to nitrate. In target cells challenged with exogenously added synthetic PN, a series of metalloporphyrin catalysts (5,10,15,20-tetrakis(2,4,6-trimethyl-3,3-disulfonatophenyl)porphyrinato iron (III) (FeTMPS); 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-sulfonatophenyl)porphyrinato iron (III) (FeTPPS); 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(N-methyl-4'-pyridyl)porphyrinato iron (III) (FeTMPyP)) provided protection against PN-mediated injury with EC50 values for each compound 30-50-fold below the final concentration of PN added. Cytoprotection was correlated with a reduction in the level of measurable nitrotyrosine. In addition, we found our catalysts to be cytoprotective against endogenously generated PN in endotoxin-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells as well as in dissociated cultures of hippocampal neurons and glia that had been exposed to cytokines. Our studies thus provide compelling evidence for the involvement of peroxynitrite in cytokine-mediated cellular injury and suggest the therapeutic potential of PN decomposition catalysts in reducing cellular damage at sites of inflammation.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

The excess production of nitric oxide, generated primarily by the inducible nitric-oxide synthase (iNOS),1 has been implicated as a mediator of cellular injury at sites of inflammation (1, 2). However, recent evidence supports a role for peroxynitrite (PN) in the cellular damage and death (3, 4) once attributed entirely to nitric oxide (NO). The formation of this powerful oxidant from nitric oxide and superoxide anion, free radical species frequently generated by activated infiltrating leukocytes, is essentially diffusion-limited. Peroxynitrite has been shown to cause lipid peroxidation (5), chemical cleavage of DNA (6, 7), inactivation of key metabolic enzymes such as aconitase (8, 9), ribonucleotide reductase, succinate dehydrogenase, and cytochrome oxidase of the mitochondrial electron transport chain (10, 11), and reduction in cellular antioxidant defenses by oxidation of thiol pools (12). PN can also nitrate protein tyrosine residues, possibly leading to inactivation of tyrosine kinase activity (13) or to the disruption of key cytoskeletal components that may contribute to the pathogenesis of diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (14) or ALS. At physiologic or acidic pH, the protonated form of PN is a short lived molecule. As a result of this instability, the detection of nitrotyrosine has become a reliable biochemical marker for the presence of peroxynitrite in pathophysiological processes. Nitrotyrosine has been detected in tissues from Alzheimer's (15), multiple sclerosis2 (16), ALS (14, 17), and rheumatoid arthritis (18) patients, suggesting a role for peroxynitrite in the pathogenesis of these diseases. It should be noted, however, that evidence for PN-independent routes of nitrotyrosine formation have been recently demonstrated (19), indicating that careful consideration should be taken when assigning the source of oxidative damage in a disease process.

There is accumulating evidence arising from different in vitro cellular systems that the generation of PN occurs during cytokine stimulation leading to cellular injury and death (20-23). Both apoptotic and necrotic pathways for cell death have been invoked as consequences of exposure to PN (24-27). In this report, we test the hypothesis that by pharmacologically manipulating the effective concentration of either exogenously added or endogenously produced PN, we can protect cells from injury. The peroxynitrite decomposition catalysts FeTMPS, FeTPPS and FeTMPyP (28, 29) were cytoprotective in both experimental paradigms, demonstrating that the catalytic shunting of PN to an innocuous form, i.e. nitrate, may have therapeutic utility in reducing tissue damage during inflammation.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Cell Culture-- RAW 264.7 cells and the human adenocarcinoma cell line, DLD-1, were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum at 5% CO2 and 37 °C. Dissociated cultures of rat hippocampal neurons were grown on a glial feeder layer as described previously (30, 31) with the following modifications. Briefly, 1-day old Sprague-Dawley (Charles River, MA) rat pups were sacrificed, and their hippocampi were surgically removed and then dissociated both mechanically and enzymatically by papain digestion. Debris was removed by low speed centrifugation. Cells were plated at a density of 50,000 cells per well on a 96-well plate containing a confluent layer of glia (initial plating of approximately 3100 cells per well 5-6 days previously). Cultures were grown for 7 days in MEM (minus phenol red) supplemented with 0.5% glucose, 0.22% NaHCO3, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 10% NU-Serum I (Becton Dickinson). No anti-mitotic agents were used. A mixture of cytokines was then added to induce iNOS in this culture system: lipopolysaccharide (0111:B4) at 100 to 200 ng/ml; interferon gamma (200 to 400 units/ml); tumore necrosis factor alpha  (150 to 300 units/ml); interleukin 1beta (5-10 ng/ml). Five to seven days following the initiation of cytokine treatment, the cultures were analyzed for nitrite production and cell viability.

Rat Aortic Ring Preparation and Assay for the Interaction of NO with PN Catalysts-- Four aortic rings were prepared from each of five rats. Briefly, thoracic aortas were removed from adult Sprague-Dawley rats anesthetized by injection with 10 mg/kg xylaxine and 50 mg/kg ketamine. Connective tissue was carefully trimmed to avoid damage to the endothelium. Rings were cut into 3-mm lengths and placed into a 10-ml tissue bath. In some experiments, the endothelium was removed by gentle rubbing of the ring preparation. Successful removal of the endothelium was confirmed by the lack of a relaxation response to acetylcholine (10 µM). Aortic rings were maintained at 37 °C in Krebs bicarbonate buffer, pH 7.2: 130 mM NaCl, 15 mM NaHCO3, 5 mM KCl, 1.2 mM NaH2PO4, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM D-glucose, and 0.1 mM ascorbic acid bubbled with 5% CO2, 95% O2. Rings were preloaded with 1 g of tension and equilibrated for 30 min with 2-3 buffer changes. After stabilization of the base line, the rings were contracted with 0.1 µM phenylephrine, producing 90-100% contraction. Nitric oxide-mediated relaxation of the precontracted, endothelium-intact rings was produced by cumulative increases in the concentration of exogenously added acetylcholine (1 nM to 10 µM) or by treatment of endothelium-denuded rings with the NO donor, sodium nitroprusside (1 nM to 10 µM). Test compounds were added to the tissue bath 10 min prior to acetylcholine or sodium nitroprusside addition. Isometric tension was recorded, and relaxation was determined as the percentage of maximum tone developed to phenylephrine.

PN-mediated Tyrosine Nitration-- Peroxynitrite and PN decomposition catalysts (28, 29) were synthesized as described previously. The PN concentration was determined prior to use by measuring the absorbance at 302 nm and using an extinction coefficient of 1.67 mM-1 cm-1. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was dissolved at a concentration of 5 mg/ml in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, that had been vigorously degassed with nitrogen. A 2 mM NO solution was prepared by several minutes of bubbling pure NO gas into the same buffer at ambient temperature.

To test the relative nitration efficiency of NO and PN in the presence and absence of PN decomposition catalysts, the stock BSA solution was injected via syringe into the NO solution while stirring. After a 10-min open air incubation, aliquots were collected for analysis. Peroxynitrite was similarly added to BSA in the presence or absence of the PN decomposition catalyst, FeTMPS. Formation of nitrotyrosine residues on the BSA target molecule was monitored by Western blot in each reaction. Briefly, samples (2.5 µg) were solubilized in SDS-Laemmli buffer and heated for 10 min before loading onto a 7.5% polyacrylamide gel.The gel was transferred to nitrocellulose (32) and subsequently probed for 18 h at 4 °C with a 1:500 dilution of a rabbit polyclonal anti-nitrotyrosine antiserum (raised to PN-treated keyhole limpet hemocyanin, KLH) containing 10 mM L-tyrosine (to reduce nonspecific staining). To demonstrate the specificity of staining for nitrotyrosine-like immunoreactivity, a duplicate blot was similarly incubated with 10 mM 3-nitro-L-tyrosine. Following extensive washing, the blots were probed with a 1:3000 dilution of a goat anti-rabbit alkaline phosphatase conjugate and developed using the Immun-Lite system (Bio-Rad) for detection of antigen by enhanced chemiluminescence.

PN-mediated Cell Injury Assay-- RAW 264.7 cells were plated onto 96-well plates at approximately 2 × 105 cells per well and then grown in Earle's MEM (minus phenol red) containing 10% fetal calf serum and 2 mM L-glutamine. Before the addition of PN, the plates were washed several times with Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline to remove medium components such as protein and amino acids that might react with the PN pulse. The PN was then added to each well of cells, containing 200 µl of Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline with or without test compound, followed by gentle swirling. After 15 min at ambient temperature, cells were washed once with medium and incubated with 200 µl per well of 10% Alamar Blue in complete medium for 1-2 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2 to assess cellular viability. At the end of the assay, 100 µl was removed from each well and read on a Pandex fluorescent plate reader at an excitation of 545 nm and an emission wavelength of 575 nm with a 1% gain setting. The mitochondrial generation of the fluorescent product of Alamar Blue was linear over a 2-h period and correlated well with cellular viability and number (data not shown). Viability is expressed as the percent of untreated control following subtraction of the nonspecific dye background.

Cytokine-driven Cytotoxicity Assays-- RAW 264.7 cells were treated with 10 µg/ml of LPS in Earle's MEM (minus phenol red) containing 10% fetal bovine serum and 2 mM L-glutamine at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Twenty-four h after LPS addition, the conditioned medium was removed, cells were washed, and cellular viability was assessed using Alamar Blue as described above.

Primary cultures of neuronal cells and glia (predominantly astrocytes) were treated with cytokines as described above for 5-7 days. To assess viability, representative fields of phase bright cells with neuronal morphology and excluding trypan blue were counted in each of four separate wells. In most cases, a radioimmunoassay for neuron-specific enolase (described below) was also performed to confirm the cell counts since the value obtained for the Alamar Blue assay was a better indicator of glial viability than of neuronal health (glia were present in larger numbers than neurons by the end of each experiment).

Neuron-specific Enolase Quantitation-- In order to assess neuronal viability, release of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) from injured and dying neurons into the culture medium was quantitated by radioimmunoassay as described by the manufacturer, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Briefly, 150 µl of conditioned medium was assayed for the gamma  isozyme of neuron-specific enolase, which, unlike lactate dehydrogenase, is not present in glia. However, serum contains a small amount of this enzyme, the levels of which were taken into account by measuring its presence in the conditioned medium of untreated controls.

Radioimmunoassay for Nitrotyrosine-- The radioimmunoassay for protein nitrotyrosine content was a modification of the method of Ischiropoulos et al. (33). Samples were denatured by boiling in SDS and then applied to nitrocellulose. After blocking, rabbit polyclonal anti-serum to nitrotyrosine (1:500 dilution) was incubated with the blot in the presence of blocking buffer (5% non-fat dry milk, 2% fetal bovine serum, 0.25% Tween 20, and 10 mM tyrosine in Tris-buffered saline). The blot was extensively washed and then incubated with 30 µCi/ml of radioiodinated donkey anti-rabbit IgG (protein concentration of approximately 10 µg/ml, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). After further washing to remove unbound secondary antibody, the blot was exposed for 5 min or more on a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics). PN-treated BSA was used as the nitrotyrosine standard to determine the level of protein-bound nitrotyrosine. The sensitivity of this assay was approximately 200 pg of nitrotyrosine. In most assays, the arbitrary PhosphorImager units obtained for the PN-treated control were normalized to 100% in order to assess the concentration dependence of PN decomposition catalyst activity.

Immunocytochemical Staining-- Immunocytochemical staining was performed as described previously (34) with the following modifications. Briefly, cells were lightly fixed in 1% formaldehyde in Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline for 5 min at room temperature followed by cold 100% ethanol for 5 min. Nonspecific staining was blocked with 3% normal goat serum in 0.5 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, containing 0.5% Triton X-100 for 1 h at room temperature. All subsequent incubations were carried out in this buffer containing 10 mM L-tyrosine. For detection of nitrotyrosine immunoreactivity, cells were incubated for 16 h at 4 °C with a 1:1000 dilution of either preimmune serum, an anti-nitrotyrosine polyclonal rabbit serum generated to nitrated keyhole limpet hemocyanin, or the anti-nitrotyrosine serum containing 10 mM nitrotyrosine to eliminate specific staining, followed by sequential incubations with biotinylated anti-rabbit IgG and an avidin-biotin-glucose oxidase complex (ABC Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA) for 2 h each. The reaction product was visualized using tetranitro blue tetrazolium for approximately 10 min.

Measurement of Nitrite and Nitrate-- Nitrite concentrations were measured as described previously using a fluorescent assay (35). When indicated, nitrate was converted to nitrite by nitrate reductase before analysis (35).

Materials-- Tissue culture media and sera were from Life Technologies, Inc. (Grand Island, NY), NO gas was from Matheson Gas Products, Inc. (St. Louis, MO), Alamar Blue was from BioSource International (Camarillo, CA), and all other chemicals and reagents were from Sigma, unless otherwise indicated.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Reduction in Protein Nitrotyrosine Content As a Measure of PN Decomposition Catalyst Activity-- To assess the activity of compounds as PN decomposition catalysts, FeTMPS was tested for its ability to reduce the level of protein nitrotyrosine content of bovine serum albumin that had been treated with synthetic peroxynitrite. Fig. 1A shows a Western blot for nitrotyrosine content of BSA treated with either 2 mM nitric oxide (lane 1) or 1 mM peroxynitrite (lane 4) in the presence (lane 5) or absence of PN catalyst in PBS. As expected, the nitrotyrosine content of PN-treated BSA (lane 4) was greatly elevated over BSA alone (lane 7), NO-treated BSA (lane 1), or PN allowed to decompose in PBS for 15 min prior to addition (lane 8). The nitrotyrosine content of the PN-treated BSA was decreased in the presence of the active catalyst, FeTMPS (10 µM, lane 5), while TMPS (an inactive compound) failed to reduce the detectable signal (lane 6). Antiserum specificity for nitrotyrosine was demonstrated either by competition with excess nitrotyrosine (10 mM) or by conversion of nitrotyrosine to aminotryrosine with 1 M dithionite (data not shown). Fig. 1B shows the results using a direct radioimmunoassay for nitrotyrosine to analyze the same samples that had been spotted onto nitrocellulose. This quantitative measure for nitrotyrosine confirmed the qualitative results using the Western analysis and was not limited to only protein that had entered the gel. It is interesting to note that the free ligand TMPS, lacking an iron center, produced an apparent increase in the measurable levels of nitrotyrosine, a result that may be explained by the observation that trace contamination with metals such as iron, especially in the presence of potential chelating agents such as TMPS, can catalyze PN-mediated nitration of tyrosine (36).


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Inhibition by FeTMPS of PN-mediated nitration of tyrosyl residues in BSA. A, Western blot analysis for protein-bound nitrotyrosine formation in bovine serum albumin treated as follows: lane 1, BSA + NO (2 mM); lane 2, BSA + NO (2 mM) + FeTMPS (10 µM); lane 3, BSA + FeTMPS; lane 4, BSA + PN (1 mM); lane 5, BSA + PN + FeTMPS (10 µM); lane 6, BSA + PN + TMPS (10 µM); lane 7, BSA alone; lane 8, decomposed PN + BSA. B, direct radioimmunoassay for nitrotyrosine content of PN-treated BSA. Each sample was individually applied to nitrocellulose. All immunoreactivity of antisera to nitrotyrosine was competed in the presence of 10 mM nitrotyrosine (data not shown).

Fig. 2 illustrates the concentration-dependent reduction of the nitrotyrosine content of BSA treated with PN (1 mM) in the presence of increasing amounts of the active catalyst FeTMPS. This contrasted with the profile obtained using ascorbate, a known PN scavenger, where concentrations equimolar (or higher) to the PN challenge were required to see an effect. TMPS, on the other hand, did not reduce the level of protein-bound nitrotyrosine, indicating that it is neither a PN catalyst nor a scavenger of PN (data not shown).


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Reduction in PN-mediated protein tyrosine nitration by the PN decomposition catalyst, FeTMPS. Concentration-response curve for FeTMPS (black-square) and ascorbate (bullet ) against 1 mM PN addition to a 2 mg/ml solution of fatty acid-free BSA dissolved in 200 µl of PBS. Nitrotyrosine formation is measured as described under "Experimental Procedures" with peroxynitrite-treated BSA representing the 100% value of arbitrary PhosphorImager units.

Immunocytochemical Detection of Nitrotyrosine on Cells Treated with PN Is Decreased by the Presence of Active Catalyst-- To investigate the ability of PN catalysts to reduce the PN-mediated modification of proteins in a cellular milieu, immunohistochemical staining of cells in culture for nitrotyrosine was performed. The human adenocarcinoma cell line DLD-1 showed surprising resistance to PN-mediated cellular damage (data not shown). When cells were treated with increasing concentrations of PN, a corresponding increase in the number of cells that stained with nitrotyrosine-specific rabbit antiserum (Fig. 3A) was observed. When the final concentration of PN was kept constant at 200 µM, cell staining was decreased in a concentration-dependent manner using the active catalyst FeTMPS (Fig. 3B). All positive staining was competed by incubation with excess nitrotyrosine (data not shown).


View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Treatment of DLD-1 cells with peroxynitrite in the presence of the PN catalyst FeTMPS reduces the immunocytochemical detection of nitrotyrosine. A, peroxynitrite-mediated nitrotyrosine staining of DLD-1 cells in culture. Increasing pulses of peroxynitrite (20, 50, 100, and 200 µM) were added to each well of cells. PN (200 µM) was allowed to decompose for 15 min in PBS and then added to the cells. Excess nitrotyrosine (10 mM) was used to compete the positive nitrotyrosine staining resulting from treatment with 200 µM PN. B, reduction in nitrotyrosine staining of DLD-1 cells treated with peroxynitrite (200 µM) in the presence of increasing concentrations of FeTMPS (20, 50, 100, 200 µM) and the absence of an effect by TMPS (50 µM).

PN Decomposition Catalysts Protect Cells from PN-mediated Injury-- Cellular injury is a very real consequence of exposure to PN, a powerful oxidant of not only protein but also nucleic acid and lipid. A typical concentration-response curve for cellular injury to RAW 264.7 cells by exogenously added peroxynitrite is shown in Fig. 4A. Cellular viability was measured by monitoring the reduction of the electron acceptor Alamar Blue to a fluorescent product by the mitochondrial electron transport chain. Fig. 4, B and C, illustrates the cytoprotection afforded by FeTMPyP and FeTPPS, respectively, against exogenously added synthetic PN.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   The PN catalysts FeTMPyP and FeTPPS protect RAW cells from PN-mediated cellular injury. A, cellular viability with increasing concentrations of exogenously added PN. B, concentration-response curve of FeTMPyP (black-square) and TMPyP (bullet ) to an exogenous pulse of PN (300 µM). C, concentration-response curve for FeTPPS (black-square) and TPPS (bullet ) against a 200 µM PN pulse. Viability was determined by the capacity of cells to metabolize Alamar Blue to a fluorescent product. Each value is the average of measurements from four wells of cells ± S.E.

Nitrotyrosine is a relatively specific and stable biochemical marker for the generation of PN. The mechanism of action of PN decomposition catalysts should favor a reduction in the nitrotyrosine content of cellular proteins exposed to PN. When the level of protein-bound nitrotyrosine following a PN pulse was measured by radioimmunoassay analysis of cellular contents either released into the medium (Fig. 5) or remaining on cells (data not shown), there was a strong correlation between nitrotyrosine level and the size of the PN pulse (Fig. 5A). In both cases, the level of nitrotyrosine was reduced in a concentration-dependent manner by the active compound FeTPPS (Fig. 5B).


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Effect of FeTPPS on the cellular release of nitrotyrosine-labeled proteins into the medium resulting from PN treatment. A, increasing PN pulses result in larger amounts of nitrotyrosine-labeled proteins released into the medium. PhosphorImager units are expressed as AU (arbitrary units). B, FeTPPS reduces the PN-mediated (200 µM) release of nitrated cellular proteins into the medium as compared with PN-treated control. Values are the average of two wells of cells ± S.D.

Fig. 6 illustrates the difference in the concentration-response profile for a PN catalyst compared with a typical free radical scavenger such as ascorbate which reacts stoichiometrically with the oxidant until its reactive moieties are depleted. There was an essentially complete protection of RAW cells from a 200 µM PN challenge in the presence of 10 µM FeTMPS. This is in sharp contrast to ascorbic acid which was fully protective at a 2-fold molar excess to PN, and to TMPS which was inactive at all concentrations tested. Nitrotyrosine content of released intracellular proteins was used as a marker for the extent of PN-mediated injury in these cells. FeTMPS reduced the level of detectable protein-bound nitrotyrosine release (Fig. 6B).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Comparison of the cytoprotective capacity of the PN catalyst FeTMPS and the antioxidant ascorbate. A, differential protection from PN-induced cellular injury of RAW cells by the PN catalyst FeTMPS (black-square) and the PN scavenger ascorbate (bullet ) while TMPS (square ) was inactive. Values represent the average of four wells ± S.E. B, FeTMPS (black-square) and ascorbate (bullet ) reduce the level of nitrated cellular proteins (NT) released into the medium following PN treatment (200 µM). Values are the average of measurements from two wells of cells ± S.D.

There was no cytoprotection observed when FeCl3 was used or when catalyst was added after PN application (data not shown). The free ligands TPPS, TMPyP, and TMPS are inactive as decomposition catalysts and were unable to protect from PN-mediated damage.

Cytokine-mediated Injury Is Attenuated by Treatment with PN Decomposition Catalysts-- We next examined the cytoprotective capacity of PN decomposition catalysts against endogenously produced PN. The murine monocyte-macrophage cell line, RAW 264.7, can be stimulated to express iNOS with endotoxin. Enzyme activity was monitored by measuring nitrite accumulation in the conditioned medium. As shown in Fig. 7B, the induction of iNOS markedly reduced cell viability (congruent  20%). Inhibition of cellular iNOS activity with L-NMA or the selective iNOS inhibitors aminoguanidine (data not shown) and L-NIL (32, 39, 40) resulted in a concentration-dependent increase in cellular viability accompanied by a corresponding decrease in accumulated nitrite (Fig. 7) when compared with the endotoxin control.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   L-NIL protects LPS-treated RAW cells from loss of cellular viability. A, L-NIL inhibition of nitrite production by LPS (bullet ) -treated RAW cells. Uninduced (square ) cells did not produce nitrite. B, L-NIL protects cells from endotoxin-induced injury (bullet ) while L-NIL treatment of uninduced cells showed no apparent toxicity (square ). C, inverse relationship of nitrite production with cellular viability as assessed by mitochondrial reduction of Alamar Blue. Each value is the average of determinations from four wells of cells ± S.E.

As shown in Fig. 8, co-incubation of the PN decomposition catalysts with endotoxin increased cellular viability when examined 24 h after the beginning of treatment. Fig. 8 illustrates the cytoprotective profile for the active catalysts FeTMPS (Fig. 8A) and FeTPPS (Fig. 8B). The free ligands (i.e. TMPS, TPPS) afforded cytoprotection at much higher concentrations than the active catalysts. To rule out metabolic conversion of the free ligand to an active form, the inactive analog ZnTMPS and the weak catalyst MnTPPS were tested (Fig. 8B). Neither compound showed protective effects at the highest concentrations applied.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Effect of PN catalysts on LPS-mediated cellular injury. A, RAW cells treated for 20 h with LPS(10 µg/ml) were assayed for cell viability as described under "Experimental Procedures." Cells were induced in the presence of either FeTMPS (black-square) or TMPS (square ). B, cells induced with LPS were treated as follows: FeTPPS (black-square), TPPS (square ), MnTPPS (black-triangle), ZnTMPS (black-diamond ). Each determination is the average of values from eight wells of cells ± S.E.

We next extended our studies utilizing cell lines to primary cultures of neurons and glia, cells known to be susceptible to cytokine-mediated injury. In fact, cytokine-mediated injury accompanied by expression of iNOS and cyclooxygenase-2 may contribute significantly to the neural damage associated with human disorders such as stroke. Accordingly, we examined the cytoprotection afforded by PN decomposition catalysts on mixed cultures of dissociated hippocampal neurons and glia (predominantly astrocytes) treated with a mixture of cytokines and endotoxin. Cellular viability was assessed using several biochemical criteria: for neurons, by counting phase bright trypan blue impermeant cells exhibiting neuronal morphology and by measuring neuron-specific enolase release from injured and dying cells; and for glia (comprising the majority of the cells per well), by measuring the release of lactate dehydrogenase from injured and dying cells or by assessing the cellular capacity to convert Alamar Blue to its fluorescent product by functional mitochondria. Primary cultures were exposed to cytokines and endotoxin for 5-7 days at the end of which viability and NOS activity were quantitated. Fig. 9 summarizes the results that we obtained using FeTMPS. Although there was typically no concentration-dependent decrease in accumulated nitrite and nitrate by the cells (data not shown), there was a profound protection of both neurons and glia by treatment with either FeTMPS (Fig. 9) or FeTPPS (data not shown) when compared with the inactive analogue, ZnTMPS. The pharmacological response profile differed between neurons (Fig. 9, A and B) and glia (Fig. 9C), with glial cells being more amenable to cytoprotection. Nevertheless, PN catalyst protection was evident in either case. The only obvious difference was morphological, with glial cells maintaining their morphology while neurons largely withdrew their processes from the glial feeder layer at the higher concentrations of catalyst used (10 and 20 µM). This result was in sharp contrast to L-NIL treatment which preserved neuronal morphology with a coincident drop in nitrite production (data not shown) and neurotoxicity (Fig. 9).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Effect of PN catalysts on cytokine-mediated cellular injury in mixed cultures of rat hippocampal neurons and glia. A, hippocampal neurons prepared from postnatal day 1 rat pups were treated for 5 days with a cytokine/endotoxin mixture as described under "Experimental Procedures." At the end of this period, phase-bright cells excluding trypan blue were counted in representative fields in each of four replicate wells for each condition on the 96-well plate. 100% viability is equal to 490 cells/mm2 ± 49 (S.E.). The cytoprotective capacity of FeTMPS (black-square) and ZnTMPS (bullet ) was examined. B, release of neuron-specific enolase from cytokine-treated cultures was examined using L-NIL (100 µM), FeTMPS (5 µM), and ZnTMPS (5 µM). C, metabolism of Alamar Blue was used to assess the mitochondrial integrity of all cells in the mixed culture of neurons and glia. Because of the absence of an anti-mitotic, the greater number of glia contributed largely to the signal obtained. The results obtained with L-NIL (100 µM), FeTMPS (5 µM), and ZnTMPS (5 µM) are the average values from four wells of cells ± S.E.

Lack of Interaction between NO and PN Catalysts-- To rule out the catalytic removal of NO by the PN catalysts as a possible explanation for their cytoprotective action, we examined their effect on guanylate cyclase-mediated relaxation of rat aortic rings. The effect of FeTMPS and FeTMPyP on endothelium-dependent (endogenously produced NO) and -independent (exogenously added NO) relaxation in rat aortic rings was examined. Acetylcholine-mediated relaxations are dependent upon the release of nitric oxide from the endothelium while its removal eliminates the vasorelaxant effect of this vasodilator (1). Fig. 10A demonstrates that acetylcholine (1-100 nM) -mediated relaxation of phenylephrine (0.1 µM) -preconstricted aortic rings was not affected by preincubation with either FeTMPS or FeTMPyP (300 µM). In contrast, hemoglobin (5 µM), which is known to bind to and completely inactivate NO, abolished the acetylcholine-mediated relaxation. To further illustrate that acetylcholine was producing its effects by stimulating NO generation, the NOS inhibitor L-NAME (100 µM) was added to the organ bath. Like hemoglobin, L-NAME completely inhibited the relaxations.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Lack of PN catalyst interaction with NO. Acetylcholine-mediated relaxation of precontracted rat aortic rings (top panel) was unaltered by the presence of either FeTMPS or FeTMPyP while hemoglobin (Hb) and the NOS inhibitor L-NAME were completely effective in abolishing relaxation. A similar experiment using the NO donor SNP was conducted on endothelium-denuded rings (bottom panel). PN decomposition catalysts (300 µM) had no effect while hemoglobin (5 µM) completely abolished the NO-mediated relaxation.

The relaxation of precontracted endothelium-denuded aortic rings following the exogenous addition of sodium nitroprusside (SNP), an NO donor, at concentrations ranging from 1 nM to 1 µM was also unaffected by the presence of FeTMPS or FeTMPyP (300 µM). In contrast to the catalysts, hemoglobin (5 µM) eliminated the relaxation response of the denuded rings (Fig. 10B). Thus, regardless of the source of NO, PN catalysts produced no detectable inhibition of the guanylate cyclase-mediated relaxation of vascular smooth muscle. Conversely, because SOD and SOD-mimics clearly potentiate the activation of guanylate cyclase by NO (1, 37), the lack of a PN catalyst-mediated increase in the NO-driven relaxation response of aortic rings suggests that any SOD mimetic activity associated with the catalysts is neglibible.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

A greater understanding of the role played by peroxynitrite in the pathogenesis of human disease will aid in the design of rational therapies for pharmacological intervention. Peroxynitrite is thought to possess a dual free radical nature capable of hydroxyl radical-like lipid peroxidation and NO2·-driven nitration of tyrosine. Stability of PN is pH-dependent, with protonation resulting in either decomposition into predominantly nitrate or the initiation of oxidative processes including lipid peroxidation and the nitration of tyrosine. Thus, a compound capable of diverting PN into a "non-destructive" pathway would increase nitrate while reducing free radical-initiated damage to critical molecular targets within the cell. The chemical synthesis and proposed mechanism of action of such compounds have recently been described (28, 38) as has their efficacy in in vivo models of inflammation (29).The purpose of this study was to more fully characterize the cytoprotective properties of this novel class of compounds, the peroxynitrite decomposition catalysts.

Inherent in the transient nature of many free radical species is the difficulty in measuring their presence in more complex living systems. While lipid peroxidation can result from Fenton/Haber-Weiss chemistry, tyrosine nitration represents a stable biochemical marker, which with a few noteworthy exceptions (19), is relatively specific for peroxynitrite generation (4). We have presented evidence for a reduction in protein nitrotyrosine content when synthetic PN is added to BSA in the presence of the active catalyst FeTMPS; the inactive compound TMPS, which lacks the iron center of active catalysts, did not reduce PN-mediated tyrosine nitration, indicating that it is neither a catalyst nor a scavenger of PN. To assess the activity of the catalysts on a broader array of protein targets within a cellular context, human adenocarcinoma cells (DLD-1) treated with PN showed positive immunostaining for nitrotyrosine. As was observed with BSA, PN decomposition catalysts caused a concentration-dependent reduction in PN-generated nitrotyrosine staining of cellular protein.

Because the physiological consequences of peroxynitrite generation are associated with tissue damage, we next tested the utility of peroxynitrite decomposition catalysts in preventing PN-mediated cellular injury and death. Peroxynitrite, the product of the diffusion-limited reaction of superoxide anion with nitric oxide, has been shown to participate in both apoptotic and necrotic cellular injury (24-26). Diseases in which PN has been implicated include ischemia-reperfusion injury, stroke, Alzheimer's disease, ALS, multiple sclerosis, and rheumatoid arthritis (14-18). In fact, there is compelling evidence for PN generation by cytokine and LPS-treated cells. It includes analysis of predicted nitrite/nitrate ratios (20, 41, 42) as well as the direct measurement of nitrotyrosine formation by HPLC/mass spectroscopy (43), the detection of catalase-insensitive but superoxide dismutase/NOS inhibitor-sensitive 1,2,3-rhodamine formation (21), and immunohistochemical staining of primary cultures of cytokine-stimulated glia (22).

We have utilized the monocyte-macrophage line, RAW 264.7, both as a target for exogenously added PN and as a cellular source of endogenously produced PN. To determine the efficacy of PN catalysts, we initially used a defined pulse of synthetic PN in our studies. FeTMPS, FeTPPS, and FeTMPyP were cytoprotective at concentrations 30-50 fold below the size (final concentration) of the PN challenge. The inactive (free ligand) analogues did not protect. This protection depended on the prior presence of catalyst and was not apparent with FeCl3 alone. Perhaps most compelling was the difference between concentration-response (cytoprotection) curves for FeTMPS and ascorbate. Ascorbate followed a scavenger activity profile necessitating a 2-fold molar excess of the anti-oxidant over the size of the PN pulse in order to be totally effective. This requirement for a molar excess of free radical scavenger (or reactive groups contained within such an antioxidant) is consistent with that observed for uric acid and cysteine when exposed to PN (44, 45). PN-generated nitrotyrosine formation in cellular proteins was also reduced in a concentration-dependent manner by PN catalyst, a result comparing favorably with its EC50 value for cytoprotection (approximately 5 µM for FeTPPS).

Endotoxin and cytokines have been used to induce iNOS and to produce a sustained elevation of superoxide anion in cells of monocyte-macrophage origin (20-22, 41). The resulting peroxynitrite formation was correlated with a decrease in cellular viability as measured by mitochondrial metabolism of MTT (21). In our study, RAW cells treated for 24 h with LPS showed a greatly reduced capacity for converting Alamar Blue to its fluorescent metabolite, an indicator of mitochondrial oxidative metabolism. This, in turn, could be prevented by NOS inhibition, suggesting NO-driven mitochondrial dysfunction, a well documented effect on mitochondrial electron transport (10, 46). Treatment of these cells with catalyst also resulted in cytoprotection by this criterion, an observation consistent with peroxynitrite-mediated cell injury. Uninduced cells incubated overnight with catalyst did not show any significant loss in viability (data not shown), although compound seemed to be taken up into cells as evidenced by the visible reddish-brown tint of the cell layer after washing.

Neurons of the central nervous system, especially those of the hippocampus, are very susceptible to cytokine-mediated damage especially in the context of the later stages of stroke (47-52). Glial cells, on the other hand, seem to be more resistant to such injury (11). In vitro generation of PN by cytokine-activated glia has recently been demonstrated (22). Primary cultures of human astrocytes stained positively for nitrotyrosine after several days of treatment with cytokines. This staining correlated well with the expression of iNOS (22). We decided to test the cytoprotective capacity of PN decomposition catalysts on primary cultures of rat hippocampal neurons and glia subjected to cytokine insult for 5-7 days. FeTMPS was more cytoprotective than FeTPPS and compared favorably with L-NIL, a selective iNOS inhibitor. We found the astrocytic feeder layer more amenable to protection by these compounds when compared with their neuronal counterparts. Accumulated levels of nitrite were usually unaffected, suggesting that NOS inhibition is not part of the mechanism of action of PN decomposition catalysts.

In summary, our data demonstrate the utility of PN decomposition catalysts as cytoprotective agents against PN-mediated cellular injury and death. Our data are also consistent with their proposed chemical mechanism of action by revealing a measurable reduction in protein nitrotyrosine content of PN-treated cells in culture. Moreover, the preservation of cellular viability from PN-mediated damage is critical to any consideration of the potential therapeutic value of PN catalysts. Where peroxynitrite fits into the pathogenesis of diseases such as Alzheimer's and multiple sclerosis and whether it is a causative agent or merely a marker for a pathological faite accompli remain very much open questions. Answers to questions such as these will define the clinical utility of drugs capable of intercepting PN and catalyzing its conversion into innocuous metabolites such as nitrate.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Discovery Pharmacology, Searle R&D, 800 N. Lindbergh Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63167. Tel.: 314-694-8954; Fax: 314-694-8949.

1 The abbreviations used are: iNOS, inducible nitric-oxide synthase; FeTMPS, 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(2,4,6-trimethyl-3,3-disulfonatophenyl)porphyrinato iron (III); FeTPPS, 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-sulfonatophenyl) porphyrinato iron (III); FeTMPyP, 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(N-methyl-4rho -pyridyl)porphyrinato iron (III); PN, peroxynitrite; NO, nitric oxide; ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; L-NMA, N-METHYL-L-arginine; L-NAME, L-nitro-arginine-methyl ester; L-NIL, N-iminoethyl-L-lysine; SOD, superoxide dismutase; SNP, sodium nitroprusside; BSA, bovine serum albumin; LPS, lipopolysaccharide.

2 Cross, A. H., Manning, P. T., Keeling, R. M., Schmidt, R. E., and Misko, T. P. (1998) J. Neuroimmunol., in press.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Moncada, S., Palmer, R. M. J., and Higgs, E. A. (1991) Pharmacol. Rev. 43, 109-142[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Nathan, C. (1992) FASEB J. 6, 3051-3064[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Pryor, W. A., and Squadrito, G. L. (1995) Am. J. Physiol. 268, L699-L722[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Beckman, J. S., and Koppenol, W. H. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 271, C1424-C1451[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Radi, R., Beckman, J. S., Bush, K. M., and Freeman, B. A. (1991) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 288, 481-487[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Douki, T., Cadet, J., and Ames, B. N. (1996) Chem. Res. Toxicol 9, 3-7[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Yermilov, V., Rubio, J., Becchi, M., Friesen, M. D., Pignatelli, B., and Ohshima, H. (1995) Carcinogenesis 16, 2045-2050[Abstract]
  8. Castro, L., Rodriguez, M., and Radi, R. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 29409-29415[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Hausladen, A., and Fridovich, I. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 29405-29408[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Radi, R., Rodriguez, M., Castro, L., and Telleri, R. (1994) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 308, 89-95[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Bolanos, J. P., Heales, S. J. R., Land, J. M., and Clark, J. B. (1995) J. Neurochem. 64, 1965-1972[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Salgo, M. G., Bermudez, E., Squadrito, G. L., and Pryor, W. A. (1995) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 322, 500-505[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Martin, B. L., Wu, D., Jakes, S., and Graves, D. J. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 7108-7111[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Beckman, J. S., Carson, M., Smith, C. D., and Koppenol, W. H. (1993) Nature 364, 584[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Good, P. F., Werner, P., Hsu, A., Olanow, C. W., and Perl, D. P. (1996) Am. J. Pathol. 149, 21-28[Abstract]
  16. Bagasra, O., Michaels, F. H., Zheng, Y. M., Bobroski, L. E., Spitsin, S. V., Fu, Z. F., Tawadros, R., and Koprowski, H. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 12041-12045[Abstract]
  17. Bruijn, L. I., Beal, M. F., Becher, M. W., Schulz, J. B., Wong, P. C., Price, D. L., and Cleveland, D. W. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 7606-7611[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Kaur, H., and Halliwell, B. (1994) FEBS Lett. 350, 9-12[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Eiserich, J. P., Hristova, M., Cross, C. E., Jones, A. D., Freeman, B. A., Halliwell, B., and van der Vliet, A. (1998) Nature 391, 393-397[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Lewis, R. S., Tamir, S., Tannenbaum, S. R., and Deen, W. M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 29350-29355[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Zingarelli, B., O'Connor, M., Wong, H., Salzman, A. L., and Szabo, C. (1996) J. Immunol. 156, 350-358[Abstract]
  22. Ding, M., St. Pierre, B. A., Parkinson, J. F., Medberry, P., Wong, J. L., Rogers, N. E., Ignarro, L. J., and Merrill, J. E. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 11327-11335[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Mebmer, U. K., Lapetina, E. G., and Brune, B. (1995) Mol. Pharmacol. 47, 757-765[Abstract]
  24. Bonfoco, E., Krainc, D., Ankarcrona, M., Nicotera, P., and Lipton, S. A. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 7162-7166[Abstract]
  25. Lin, K.-T., Xue, J.-Y., Spur, B., and Wong, P. Y.-K. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 16487-16490[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Szabo, C., Day, B. J., and Salzman, A. L. (1996) FEBS Lett. 381, 82-86[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Estevez, A. G., Radi, R., Barbeito, L., Shin, J. T., Thompson, J. A., and Beckman, J. S. (1995) J. Neurochem. 65, 1543-1550[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Stern, M. K., Jensen, M. P., and Kramer, K. (1996) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 8735-8736[CrossRef]
  29. Salvemini, D., Wang, Zhi-Qiang, Stern, M. K., Currie, M. G., and Misko, T. P. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 2659-2663[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Yamada, K. A., Dubinsky, J. M., and Rothman, S. M. (1989) J. Neurosci. 9, 3230-3236[Abstract]
  31. Yoon, K-W, Covey, D. F., and Rothman, S. M. (1993) J. Physiol. 464, 423-439[Abstract]
  32. Misko, T. P., Trotter, J. L., and Cross, A. H. (1995) J. Neuroimmunol. 61, 195-204[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Ischiropoulos, H., Beers, M. F., Ohnishi, S. T., Fisher, D., Garner, S. E., and Thom, S. R. (1996) J. Clin. Invest. 97, 2260-2267[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Salvemini, D., Wang, Z-Q., Bourdon, D. M., Stern, M. K., Currie, M. G., and Manning, P. T. (1996) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 303, 217-220[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Misko, T. P., Schilling, R. J., Salvemini, D., Moore, W. M., and Currie, M. G. (1993) Anal. Biochem. 214, 11-16[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Beckman, J. S., Ischiropoulos, H., Zhu, L., van der Woerd, M., Smith, C., Chen, J., Harrison, J., Martin, J. C., and Tsai, M. (1992) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 298, 438-445[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Kasten, T. P., Settle, S. L., Misko, T. P., Riley, D. P., Weiss, R. W., Currie, M. G., and Nickols, G. A. (1995) Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 208, 170-177[Abstract]
  38. Lee, J., Hunt, J. A., and Groves, J. T. (1997) Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 7, 2913-2918[CrossRef]
  39. Misko, T. P., Moore, W. M., Kasten, T. P., Nickols, G. A., Corbett, J. A., Tilton, R. G., McDaniel, M. L., Williamson, J. R., and Currie, M. G. (1993) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 233, 119-125[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Moore, W. M., Webber, R. K., Jerome, G. M., Tjoeng, F. S., Misko, T. P., and Currie, M. G. (1994) J. Med. Chem. 37, 3886-3888[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Ischiropoulos, H., Ling, Z., and Beckman, J. S. (1992) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 298, 446-451[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Ignarro, L. J., Fukuto, J. M., Griscavage, J. M., Rogers, N. E., and Byrns, R. E. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 8103-8107[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Shigenaga, M. K., Lee, H. H., Blount, B. C., Christen, S., Shigeno, E. T., Yip, H., and Ames, B. N. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 3211-3216[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Bartlett, D., Church, D. F., Bounds, P. L., and Koppenol, W. H. (1995) Free Radical Biol. Med. 18, 85-92[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Gow, A., Duran, D., Thom, S. R., and Ischiropoulos, H. (1996) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 333, 42-48[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Cleeter, M. W. J., Cooper, J. M., Darley-Usmar, V. M., Moncada, S., and Schapira, A. H. V. (1994) FEBS Lett. 345, 50-54[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Liu, T., Clark, R. K., McDonnell, P. C., Young, P. R., White, R. F., Barone, F. C., and Feuerstein, G. Z. (1994) Stroke 25, 1481-1488[Abstract]
  48. Iadecola, C., Xu, X., Zhang, F., El-Fakahany, E. E., and Ross, M. E. (1995) J. Cerebr. Blood Flow Metab. 15, 52-59[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Hewett, S. J., Csernansky, C. A., and Choi, D. W. (1994) Neuron 13, 487-494[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Dawson, V. L., Brahmbhatt, H. P., Mong, J. A., and Dawson, T. M. (1994) Neuropharmacol. 33, 1425-1430[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  51. Skaper, S. D., Facci, L., and Leon, A. (1995) J. Neurochem. 64, 266-276[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  52. Togashi, H., Masayuki, S., Frohman, E., Taira, E., Ratan, R. R., Dawson, T. M., and Dawson, V. L. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 2676-2680[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.