The Repressor Protein, Bm3R1, Mediates an Adaptive Response to Toxic Fatty Acids in Bacillus megaterium*

Colin N. A. Palmer, Eva Axen, Valerie Hughes, and C. Roland WolfDagger

From the Biomedical Research Centre and ICRF Molecular Pharmacology Unit, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, United Kingdom

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Bm3R1 is a helix-turn-helix transcriptional repressor from Bacillus megaterium whose binding to DNA is inhibited by fatty acids and a wide range of compounds that modulate lipid metabolism. The inactivation of Bm3R1/DNA binding activity results in the activation of transcription of the operon encoding a fatty acid hydroxylase, cytochrome P450 102. The metabolic role of this operon is unknown. It is possible that it is involved in the synthesis of modified fatty acids as part of normal cellular metabolism or may represent a protective mechanism by which B. megaterium detoxifies harmful foreign lipids. In this report we demonstrate that polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) activate the transcription of the CYP102 operon. These PUFA are the most potent activators of the CYP102 operon observed to date, and we show that their effects are due to binding directly to Bm3R1. In addition, cultures that have been treated with the CYP102 inducer, nafenopin, are protected against PUFA toxicity. Resistance to PUFA toxicity is also seen in a Bm3R1-deficient strain that constitutively expresses CYP102. The resistant phenotype of this Bm3R1 mutant strain is reversed by specific chemical inactivation of CYP102. These data demonstrate that Bm3R1 can act as a direct sensor of toxic fatty acids and, in addition, provide the first direct evidence of fatty acids binding to a prokaryotic transcription factor.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Unsaturated fatty acids are essential structural components of the cell membrane. They are also sophisticated signaling molecules that can mediate a myriad of processes involved in cellular communication, differentiation, and cell death (1-5). It is for these reasons that all organisms require tight regulation of the lipid composition of the cell. Perturbations in the levels of different types of lipid may be fatal due to disruption of membrane structure and metabolic or regulatory processes (2). The mammalian liver responds to perturbations in lipid homeostasis by the induction of cytochrome P450 fatty acid hydroxylases and the enzymes for peroxisomal beta -oxidation (6, 7). Perturbations in lipid homeostasis may take the form of high fat diet, diabetes, or treatment with fatty acid mimetics such as peroxisome proliferators or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (8). The regulation of lipid metabolism under such conditions has been shown to be a direct genomic response where a transcription factor responds directly to free fatty acids and acts as a molecular switch for the regulated transcription of genes encoding fatty acid-metabolizing enzymes (9-13); however, the role of mammalian fatty acid hydroxylases in the clearance of fatty acids is not well defined.

The cytochrome P450 fatty acid hydroxylases are regulated by peroxisome proliferators in many other types of organisms including plants and Bacillus megaterium (14, 15). It could therefore be hypothesized that inducible fatty acid hydroxylation represents an ancient regulatory metabolic response to lipid overload.

The simplest of these organisms, B. megaterium, is a soil-living Gram-positive bacterium that utilizes branched chain fatty acids rather than straight chain fatty acids as its main membrane phospholipid (16). B. megaterium only synthesizes small amounts of unsaturated fatty acids as a transient response to cold (17), and exogenously applied unsaturated fatty acids are toxic (18). This raises the intriguing question, how does B. megaterium cope with these toxic yet highly abundant carbon sources, i.e. plant-derived unsaturated fatty acids?

It has been known for some time that B. megaterium has the capacity to hydroxylate and epoxygenate unsaturated fatty acids (19). The enzyme responsible for these activities is a soluble cytochrome P450, designated CYP1021 or cytochrome P450BM-3 (20). Intriguingly, the repressor that controls the transcription of the CYP102 operon in response to a wide range of xenobiotic compounds is a helix-turn-helix DNA-binding protein known as Bm3R1 (21). This protein was originally characterized as mediating the induction of CYP102 by barbiturates. It has been shown that barbiturates abolish the binding of Bm3R1 to its operator DNA sequence and that this allows transcription to proceed through the Bm3R1 and CYP102 coding sequences. We have since shown that DNA binding by Bm3R1 is inhibited, and cytochrome CYP102 is induced, by a wide range of compounds that are known to perturb lipid metabolism in mammals (14, 18). These compounds include hypolipidemic drugs and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs that all appear to act as fatty acid mimetics. We have also shown that the chlorophyll metabolite, phytanic acid, induces CYP102 and is metabolized to a less potent inducing form by CYP102 (22). These findings raised the possibility that one function of CYP102 was to detoxify foreign lipids. In support of this concept was the observation that the most potent inhibitors of Bm3R1 DNA binding in vitro are polyunsaturated fatty acids (18). In these studies induction of CYP102 was not observed due to the toxicity of these compounds at the high concentrations used. In this report we provide the first evidence that unsaturated fatty acids are activators of transcription of the CYP102 operon over a very narrow range of concentrations and that these unsaturated fatty acids bind directly to Bm3R1. The narrow range of concentrations that are required for induction by unsaturated fatty acids is due to toxicity at concentrations immediately above the binding constants for Bm3R1. We have observed that treating cultures with appropriate concentrations of unsaturated fatty acids produces a very transient induction of the levels of CYP102 and that pretreatment of cultures with the peroxisome proliferator, nafenopin, allows growth in normally toxic concentrations of unsaturated fatty acids. This work demonstrates that the CYP102 operon encodes a finely tuned sensor for unsaturated fatty acids and a fatty acid hydroxylase that can mediate the detoxification of these compounds. This is the first demonstration of this cytoprotective response to toxic fatty acids.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Reagents-- Fatty acids were purchased from Sigma and Cayman Research Laboratories. Nafenopin was a generous gift from Zeneca Central Toxicology Laboratories, Macclesfield, UK, and from Dr. Brian Lake at Bibra, Carshalton, Surrey, UK. Antibodies and oligonucleotides were produced at the Imperial Cancer Research Fund laboratories at Clare Hall, Herts, UK. Mouse anti-rabbit secondary antiserum was purchased from Sigma. B. megaterium ATCC 14581 was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection. G39E mutant strain was obtained from Prof. A. Fulco, UCLA.

Purification of Recombinant Bm3R1-- Histidine tagged-Bm3R1 was expressed from the pET15b plasmid in Escherichia coli strain BL21(DE3) as described previously (18), with the following modifications. Induction of a 10-liter culture with 1 mM isopropyl-1-thio-beta -D-galactopyranoside was performed at 30 °C for 4.5 h. The cells were then harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in 600 ml of PBS containing 0.1 mg/ml lysozyme. The suspension was incubated on ice for 15 min and then the spheroplasts were harvested by centrifugation. The spheroplasts were then resuspended in 600-ml culture volume of PBS and frozen at -20 °C overnight. The spheroplasts were then thawed in cold water, and beta -mercaptoethanol was added to 5 mM. The cells were lysed by sonication, and the cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 100,000 × g for 45 min. The supernatant was made up to 10% glycerol, applied to a 25-ml nickel-agarose column, washed with 250 ml of loading buffer (PBS, 5 mM beta -mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol) and then with 500 ml of loading buffer containing 125 mM imidazole, pH 8.8. The Bm3R1 was eluted in loading buffer containing 250 mM imidazole, pH 8.8. The eluted protein was concentrated and desalted into loading buffer using a Centriprep concentrator (Amicon). Protein concentrations were determined by the Bio-Rad protein assay. The Bm3R1 was stored as a working stock of 250 ng/µl in 50% glycerol, PBS at -20 °C. The protein was greater than 95% pure as determined by scanning densitometry of the preparation visualized on a Coomassie Blue-stained, 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel (data not shown).

Fluorescent 12-AO Assay-- Purified recombinant Bm3R1 was combined with 300 nM 12-anthracene oleic acid (Molecular Probes) in 1 ml of 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5. Fluorescence was measured using a excitation wavelength of 383 nm and emission wavelength of 460 nm using a Perkin-Elmer LS-3 fluorescence spectrophotometer. The background fluorescence resulting from the protein alone and the 12-AO alone were combined and deducted from each experimental value. Kd values were obtained using Ultrafit for Macintosh.

Growth of Bacterial Cultures-- Growth of bacterial cultures was as described previously (18). B. megaterium were grown at 37 °C with aeration to an optical density of 0.2 at 600 nm. Fatty acids and drugs were prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO) and added as required. In the case of controls, Me2SO alone was added. The final Me2SO concentration did not exceed 0.5%(v/v) in any incubation.

Reporter Constructs-- Genomic fragments corresponding to the CYP102 regulatory sequences were isolated by polymerase chain reaction. Fragment C143 corresponds to positions 62 to 1573 and fragment A45 corresponds to positions 62 to 949 of the CYP102 operon, GenBankTM accession number J04832 (23). These were subcloned into the EcoRI site of the Bacillus subtilis/E. coli shuttle vector pSB355. The luciferase cDNA of pSB355 was excised by digestion with KpnI and SacI, and a KpnI/SacI fragment containing the cDNA encoding beta -galactosidase from pSVbeta -gal was ligated downstream of the CYP102 sequences. These constructs were used to transform a lacZ mutant strain of B. megaterium, PV586. The resulting strains were designated PV586/C143 and PV586/A45.

Measurement of beta -Galactosidase Activity-- Cells were harvested from 1 ml of culture by centrifugation and resuspended in 200 µl of PBS containing 0.2 mg/ml lysozyme. This suspension was incubated on ice for 30 min and then 37 °C for 5 min. The resulting spheroplasts were lysed by freeze-thawing (three times) and then sonication (25% power for 5 s). The cell debris was removed by centrifugation in a microcentrifuge at 4 °C for 10 min. The protein concentration of the supernatant was assayed using the Bio-Rad protein assay. 40 µl of the lysate was added to 160 µl of 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl beta -D-galactopyranoside solution (1 mg/ml 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl beta -D-galactopyranoside, 2 mM magnesium chloride, 0.02% Nonidet P-40, 0.01% sodium deoxycholate, 5 mM potassium ferricyanide, and 5 mM potassium ferricyanate in PBS) and incubated at 37 °C on a microtiter plate. Optical density was measured at 600 nm at hourly intervals.

Protein Immunoblotting-- Lysates were prepared as described for the measurement of beta -galactosidase activity, and proteins within these lysates (30 µg) were resolved using SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. A 7.5% acrylamide gel was used to resolve CYP102. Following separation by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, the proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose. CYP102 was identified using a polyclonal rabbit antiserum (1/2000), raised to the reductase domain of CYP102 (English et al. (18)), followed by mouse anti-rabbit serum (1/2000) conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Sigma). Following development with ECL reagent (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), the bands were visualized by autoradiography.

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)-- EMSAs were carried out as described previously (18). A double-stranded oligonucleotide, encompassing the high affinity binding site of Bm3R1 designated OIII (5'-CGGAATGAACGTTCATTCCG-3') (21), was incubated with purified recombinant Bm3R1. His-tagged Bm3R1 has a dissociation constant of 1.8 nM for this DNA sequence (24). All assays were carried out in 30 µl final volume, 60 mM KCl, 12 mM Hepes, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and glycerol (10% v/v) (EMSA buffer) containing 1 µg of carrier DNA poly(dI-dC) on ice for 15 min. 10 fmol of radioactive oligonucleotide was then added, and the sample was incubated for a further 15 min on ice. Drugs, diluted in EMSA buffer, were added to the incubations prior to the addition of the olignucleotide. The fatty acids used in this study do not disrupt the binding of mammalian nuclear proteins to DNA.2 Following incubation, 4 µl was loaded onto a 4% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel, electrophoresed at 16 mA constant current, dried, and autoradiographed. The relative radioactivity present in the free and protein bound oligonucleotide fractions was determined using a Bio-Rad PhosphorImager. Ki estimates were obtained using Ultrafit for Macintosh.

Filter Binding Assay-- Recombinant Bm3R1 (500 ng) was combined with 14C-labeled linoleic acid (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in a total volume of 100 µl of binding buffer (50 mM Hepes, pH 8.0, 100 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 20% glycerol) and incubated on ice for 4 h. The specific activity of the linoleic acid was 59 mCi/mmol. The sample was applied to a 0.45-µm HAWP filter (Millipore) under vacuum and then washed twice with 5 ml of binding buffer. The filters were then dried, and the radioactivity was determined by scintillation counting. Each sample was performed in triplicate and the mean value calculated. The level of nonspecific binding of linoleic acid to the filters was subtracted from the resulting value. The Kd and Ki values were estimated using Ultrafit for Macintosh.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Unsaturated Fatty Acids Bind Bm3R1 in Vitro-- Initial studies were directed toward establishing the role of fatty acids in regulating the CYP102 operon. In previous work we demonstrated that polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) are the most potent of the compounds tested in dissociating the Bm3R1·DNA complex in vitro (18). The finding that these compounds disrupt the binding of purified recombinant Bm3R1 to DNA provides strong evidence that the fatty acids bind to the repressor; however, this evidence is indirect. In order to demonstrate a direct interaction between unsaturated fatty acids and Bm3R1, we carried out binding experiments using a fluorescent fatty acid probe, 12-anthracene oleic acid (12-AO). This fatty acid has only a low fluorescence in aqueous solution; however, 12-AO becomes highly fluorescent when bound to the hydrophobic lipid binding sites of proteins. This interaction has been directly visualized by the crystallization of 12-AO in the lipid binding pocket of the adipocyte lipid-binding protein (25, 26). Binding studies were carried out using purified recombinant His-tagged Bm3R1. In DNA binding experiments, 12-AO inhibited the formation of the Bm3R1·DNA complex with a Ki of 1.05 µM, as previously observed for other unsaturated fatty acids (18) (Fig. 1, A and B, open squares). This was accompanied by a dose-dependent increase in fluorescence that was saturable at around 2 µM, indicating that 12-AO binds directly to Bm3R1 (Fig. 1B, filled squares). The apparent Kd of Bm3R1 as judged by the fluorescence activation is 645 nM. These values are comparable with those obtained using the adipocyte lipid-binding protein which has a Kd for 12-AO of 2 µM (25, 26). A non-lipid binding protein, trypsinogen, displayed no detectable activation of fluorescence in similar experiments (data not shown). Incubation of increasing concentrations of recombinant Bm3R1 with 3 µM 12-AO (above Kd) showed linear binding to 3 µM protein and a sharp saturation of binding at higher concentrations (Fig. 1C). This experiment demonstrated that the protein preparation is largely active and binds one molecule of 12-AO per monomer unit of Bm3R1.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   The fluorescent probe, 12-anthracene oleic acid, displaces Bm3R1 from DNA and binds directly to Bm3R1 in solution. A, EMSA were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures" using 500 ng of recombinant Bm3R1 and 10 fmol of the radiolabeled oligonucleotide pair corresponding to the CYP102 operator sequence. Increasing concentrations of 12-anthracene oleic acid were added to these assays as indicated. The signals corresponding to the free (FREE) and protein-bound (BOUND) oligonucleotide are noted. B, increasing amounts of recombinant Bm3R1 protein were added to 300 nM 12-AO, and the resulting fluorescence was determined as described under "Experimental Procedures" (filled squares). PhosphorImage analysis of the above EMSA is also plotted (open squares). The values are from a single representative of three independent experiments. C, increasing amounts of recombinant Bm3R1 protein were added to 3 µM 12-AO, and the resulting fluorescence was determined as described under "Experimental Procedures."

In addition to these experiments we also studied fatty acid binding to recombinant Bm3R1 using a rapid filtration binding assay with 14C-labeled linoleic acid. Linoleic acid disrupts the Bm3R1·DNA complex with a Ki of 648 nM (Fig. 2A). The saturation curve for the binding (Fig. 2B, open squares) was similar to that observed for the disruption of the Bm3R1·DNA complex (Fig. 2B, filled squares) with a Kd of 1.8 µM. Peroxisome proliferators, such as nafenopin, also induce CYP102 and disrupt Bm3R1·DNA binding in vitro. We therefore investigated whether nafenopin would displace linoleic acid from Bm3R1. Increasing concentrations of nafenopin were added to the binding reactions. A dose-dependent displacement of linoleic acid from Bm3R1 was observed (Fig. 2C). Nafenopin displaced linoleic acid with a Ki of 86 µM, and this value agrees well with the concentrations required to induce CYP102 activity in vivo and displace Bm3R1 from DNA in vitro (18). Another peroxisome proliferator, Wy 14,643, and the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, indomethacin, were also able to displace linoleic acid from Bm3R1 at concentrations that resulted in the induction of CYP102 (data not shown). Stearic acid (100 µM) failed to significantly displace 0.5 µM linoleic acid (data not shown), thus demonstrating the specificity of Bm3R1 for unsaturated fatty acids.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   A, inhibition of Bm3R1/DNA binding by linoleic acid. EMSAs were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures" using 500 ng of recombinant Bm3R1 and 10 fmol of the radiolabeled oligonucleotide pair corresponding to the CYP102 operator sequence. Increasing concentrations of linoleic acid were added to these assays as indicated. The signals corresponding to the free (FREE) and protein-bound (BOUND) oligonucleotide are noted. B, saturation analysis of Bm3R1 binding to 14C-labeled linoleic acid. Bm3R1 (240 nM) was incubated in solution with increasing concentrations of 14C-labeled linoleic acid. The bound linoleic acid was determined by filtration analysis as described under "Experimental Procedures" (open squares). The values represent means from triplicate filters. The experiment was repeated twice with similar results. PhosphorImage analysis of the above EMSA is also plotted (filled squares). C, displacement of 14C-labeled linoleic acid from Bm3R1 by nafenopin. Bm3R1 (2.4 µM) was incubated in solution with 0.8 µM 14C-labeled linoleic acid. Shown is the relative amounts of 14C-labeled linoleic acid bound to Bm3R1 in the presence of increasing concentrations of nafenopin. The values are expressed as a percentage of the radioactivity bound in the absence of competitor and are means from triplicate filters.

Induction of CYP102 Transcription by PUFA-- The above data showed that unsaturated fatty acids bind directly to Bm3R1 and dissociate it from DNA. The consequence of this effect in vivo should be the induction of CYP102. However, this was inconsistent with our previous findings that unsaturated fatty acids did not induce CYP102. One reason for this discrepancy was the extreme toxicity of these fatty acids at the doses used. We therefore made a more detailed analysis of the effects of fatty acids on the transcription of the CYP102 operon. For these experiments we employed a reporter system where the regulatory regions of the CYP102 operon were ligated to the coding sequence for beta -galactosidase (Fig. 3). Initial experiments using B. megaterium cultures transfected with these constructs and treated with the peroxisome proliferator, nafenopin, confirmed that the regulatory sequences required for tight regulation of the reporter plasmid included the entire coding sequence for Bm3R1. The plasmid-encoded expression of Bm3R1 is required for tight regulation as endogenous levels of Bm3R1 are not sufficient for the full repression of the multicopy reporter plasmid (27). In order to study the effects of fatty acids on the transcription of CYP102, cultures were treated with three polyunsaturated fatty acids at a concentration (5 µM) where significant displacement of Bm3R1 from its operator DNA is observed in vitro (Fig. 2B, data not shown). Stearic acid was included at 50 µM, a concentration below that required for binding to Bm3R1 to demonstrate the specificity of the induction. Saturated fatty acids such as stearic acid and palmitic acid have been shown to induce CYP102 only at concentrations greater than 200 µM (18, 28). Cell lysates were prepared at several time points after treatment and then assayed for beta -galactosidase activity (Fig. 4A). Stearic acid treatment did not increase reporter activity at any time point; however, the three polyunsaturated fatty acids tested all activated transcription at 1 h post-treatment. The transient nature of this response would be consistent with the hypothesis that CYP102 will metabolize and attenuate the fatty acid signal. In order to confirm that reporter activity reflected the accumulation of CYP102 protein, CYP102 levels in B. megaterium treated with gamma -linolenic acid were determined by Western blot analysis. A transient increase in signal was observed which was maximal at 1 h, returning to background at 2 h (Fig. 4B). This correlated well with the transcriptional activation of the CYP102 gene.


View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Structure of CYP102 reporter constructs and their activation by peroxisome proliferators. The CYP102 operon consists of two coding sequences. The coding sequence for the repressor Bm3R1 lies immediately 5' of the coding sequence for the fatty acid hydroxylase CYP102. The operator sequence that binds Bm3R1 lies between the transcriptional start site and the coding sequence for Bm3R1 (27). The genomic DNA fragments corresponding to the CYP102 regulatory sequences were cloned upstream of the beta -galactosidase cDNA. The constructs were transformed into B. megaterium PV586 and assayed for transcriptional activation by nafenopin as described under "Growth of Bacterial Cultures" (fold activation). The C143 construct contains 1 kilobase pair of flanking sequence, the transcriptional start site (indicated by arrow), the BM3R1 binding site (Operator III), and the entire coding sequence for Bm3R1. The A45 construct contains the same regulatory sequences but contains a truncated Bm3R1 coding sequence. The C143 construct shows tighter regulation by peroxisome proliferators than the A45 construct, but the A45 construct displays higher constitutive activity. The requirement for the entire coding sequence of Bm3R1 was also observed for the effective regulation of CYP102 transcription by barbiturates (27).


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   A, polyunsaturated fatty acids transiently activate CYP102 transcription. Cultures were treated with 5 µM linoleic acid (hatched bars), linolenic acid (cross-hatched bars), gamma -linolenic acid (open bars), and 50 µM stearic acid (dotted bars) Cell lysates were prepared from cultures at different time points after treatment and then assayed for beta -galactosidase activity and protein content as described under "Experimental Procedures." Shown is the beta -galactosidase activity expressed relative to the cultures treated with solvent (Me2SO) alone (Fold induction). The values are from a single representative of three independent experiments. B, gamma -linolenic acid gives a transient induction of CYP102 protein. Cultures of B. megaterium ATCC 14581 were treated with 10 µM gamma -linolenic acid and samples taken at 1, 2, and 3 h. The samples were lysed, and 30 µg of cellular protein was subjected to electrophoresis through a 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The proteins were then transferred onto nitrocellulose, and the CYP102 was visualized by immunostaining as described under "Experimental Procedures." C, linoleic, gamma -linolenic, and linolenic acid activate CYP102 transcription over a narrow range of concentrations. Increasing concentrations of fatty acids were added to cultures of PV586/C143, and growth was continued for 1 h. Cell lysates were assayed for beta -galactosidase activity and protein content. Shown is the beta -galactosidase activity expressed relative to the cultures treated with 100 µM nafenopin. Cultures were treated with increasing concentrations of linoleic acid (open squares), linolenic acid (filled squares), and gamma -linolenic acid (open circles). The values are from a single representative of three independent experiments. Also shown are the structures of the three polyunsaturated fatty acids, linoleic acid, linolenic acid, and gamma -linolenic acid.

We then investigated the relationship between fatty acid concentration and CYP102 transcriptional activation. The regulation of the reporter was studied over a range of concentrations of several different unsaturated fatty acids. The dienoic fatty acid, linoleic acid, was induced over a very narrow range of concentrations between 2 and 7 µM (Fig. 4C), whereas the trienoic, gamma -linolenic and linolenic acids were effective inducers between 2 and 20 µM (Fig. 4C). At concentrations above 20 µM significant toxicity was observed with all three unsaturated fatty acids.

Relationship between CYP102 Induction, Bm3R1 Binding, and Toxicity-- The above experiments demonstrated that polyunsaturated fatty acids bind with high affinity to Bm3R1 and activate the CYP102 gene. In order to establish the consequences of this induction we examined the relationship between induction and the ability to inhibit Bm3R1 binding to DNA and fatty acid toxicity (Fig. 5). Two closely related fatty acids were chosen for these experiments, linoleic acid and ricinoleic acid. Ricinoleic acid was chosen as it only differs from linoleic acid by the loss of a double bond and the addition of a single hydroxyl group at carbon 12 (Fig. 5A). The concentrations of these fatty acids required to abolish Bm3R1 binding to DNA (Fig. 5, A and B) correlated closely with those required to induce transcription in vivo, with linoleic acid (Ki = 648 nM) being about 30-fold more potent than ricinoleic acid (Ki = 21 µM). These data further demonstrate that subtle differences in fatty acid structure can have profound effects on Bm3R1 binding affinity. At higher concentrations there was a rapid loss of CYP102 induction. This was accompanied by a profound inhibition of cell growth, with the transcriptional activation being abolished at 8 µM linoleic acid (Fig. 5C), and above 300 µM in the case of ricinoleic acid (data not shown). The higher levels of activation of CYP102 transcription by ricinoleic acid would appear to be due to the large amounts of inducer present in the medium at the effective concentration. The reduced potency of signaling by the hydroxylated fatty acid is similar to that previously observed with phytanic acid and hydroxyphytanic acid (22).


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   A, inhibition of Bm3R1/DNA binding by ricinoleic acid. EMSA assays were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures" using 500 ng of recombinant Bm3R1 and 10 fmol of the radiolabeled oligonucleotide pair corresponding to the CYP102 operator sequence. Increasing concentrations of ricinoleic acid were added to these assays as indicated. The signals corresponding to the free (FREE) and protein-bound (BOUND) oligonucleotide are noted. The structure of ricinoleic acid is shown. B, ricinoleic acid inhibits Bm3R1/DNA binding and activates CYP102 transcription at much higher concentrations than linoleic acid. PhosphorImager analysis of the EMSA assays from Figs. 2A and 5B was used to calculate the degree of inhibition of DNA binding produced by increasing concentrations of linoleic (open circles) and ricinoleic acid (filled circles). Increasing concentrations of fatty acids were added to cultures of PV586/C143, and growth was continued for 1 h. Cell lysates were assayed for beta -galactosidase activity and protein content. Shown is the beta -galactosidase activity expressed relative to the cultures treated with 100 µM nafenopin. Cultures were treated with increasing concentrations of linoleic acid (open squares) and ricinoleic acid (filled squares). The values are from a single representative of three independent experiments. C, comparison of concentration dependence of growth inhibition and activation of CYP102 transcription by linoleic acid. The effect of increasing linoleic acid on the growth of the cultures was monitored by absorbance at 600 nm. The growth over the treatment period is expressed relative to solvent-treated cultures (filled circles). The effect of increasing linoleic acid in the reporter assay is also shown (open squares). The results of the reporter assay are expressed relative to the transcription in the absence of fatty acid (Fold induction).

Fatty Acyl-CoA Esters Bind Bm3R1 in Vitro, but Appear Not to Be the Endogenous Regulators of CYP102-- The metabolism of fatty acids can involve esterification with coenzyme A. It is therefore possible that in vivo it is the fatty acyl-CoA ester that mediates the activation of CYP102 transcription. This is thought to be the case for the transcription factor, FadR. FadR mediates the regulation of genes involved in lipid metabolism in E. coli. FadR can act as both a repressor and transcriptional activator in response to millimolar concentrations of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids (29). Free fatty acids are approximately 1000-fold less potent at inhibiting the FadR binding to operator DNA sites when compared with their CoA esters, with no apparent preference for saturated or unsaturated fatty acids (30, 31). These observations have led to the conclusion that fatty acyl-CoA esters are the regulators of FadR activity in vivo. In order to investigate the possible role of fatty acyl-CoA esters in the regulation of CYP102 transcription, we included the various fatty acyl-CoA esters in the EMSA assays using Bm3R1 (Fig. 6). The fatty acyl-CoA esters also inhibited Bm3R1/DNA binding activity and did so at at lower concentrations than the free fatty acids. In fact all of the fatty acyl-CoA esters were effective over a similar range of concentrations (40-1000 nM), including the saturated, stearoyl-CoA ester.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Fatty acyl-CoA esters inhibit DNA binding by Bm3R1. EMSA assays were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures" using 40 ng of recombinant Bm3R1 and 5 fmol of the radiolabeled oligonucleotide pair corresponding to the CYP102 operator sequence. Increasing concentrations of fatty acyl-CoAs were added to these assays. PhosphorImager analysis of these EMSA assays was used to calculate the degree inhibition of DNA binding produced by increasing concentrations of stearoyl-CoA (open squares), oleoyl-CoA (filled squares), and linoleoyl-CoA (open circles). The values are from a single representative of two independent experiments.

These findings contrast to the activity of saturated fatty acid, stearic acid, which only activates CYP102 transcription and inhibits Bm3R1/DNA binding activity at concentrations greater than 200 µM (18). The 100-fold difference in potency between stearic acid and linoleic acid in the activation of CYP102 transcription in vivo therefore appears to correlate with the ability of Bm3R1 to bind free fatty acids rather than their CoA esters (Fig. 5B). This would suggest that fatty acyl-CoA esters do not accumulate to effective concentrations in B. megaterium upon treatment of cultures with the low concentrations of free fatty acids used in this study.

Regulation of CYP102 by Bm3R1 Generates Resistance to Toxic Fatty Acids-- In order to establish the consequences of CYP102 induction, we studied the effects of increased CYP102 activity on fatty acid toxicity. The growth inhibition observed in the earlier experiments was due to the toxic effects of these fatty acids. This is more readily observed at high concentrations where toxicity leads to cell lysis. For example, treatment with 20 µM linoleic acid resulted in a decrease in culture density of 75% in 6 h (Fig. 7A). Plating out these cultures confirmed an identical drop in the number of viable cells, and inclusion of 25 µM linoleic acid produced a greater than 99% loss of viability within 1 h (data not shown). At 15 µM linoleic acid growth was initially inhibited; however, by 5 h the cultures re-entered logarithmic growth (Fig. 7B). This recovery could be explained by the metabolism and detoxification of the unsaturated fatty acids. The induction of CYP102 and subsequent oxidation of the fatty acids would represent a plausible explanation for this effect. This would imply that CYP102 provides an adaptive response mechanism for the detoxification of unsaturated fatty acids. In order to test this hypothesis, cultures of B. megaterium were pretreated with the peroxisome proliferator, nafenopin, for 1 h prior to the addition of linoleic acid. This treatment resulted in a marked induction of CYP102 (Fig. 7C, inset) and an almost complete protection from the toxic effects of the linoleic acid (Fig. 7C).


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   A, treatment of cultures with linoleic acid results in cell lysis. A culture of B. megaterium ATCC14581 was treated with 20 µM linoleic acid, and the density of the culture was monitored at hourly intervals by absorbance at 600 nm. B, B. megaterium can recover from linoleic acid toxicity. A culture of B. megaterium ATCC14581 was treated with 0 µM (open squares), 15 µM (open circles), and 20 µM (filled squares) linoleic acid, and the density of the culture was monitored at hourly intervals by absorbance at 600 nm. C, pretreatment of B. megaterium cultures with nafenopin protects the cultures from linoleic acid toxicity. A culture of B. megaterium ATCC14581 was treated with Me2SO (squares) or 100 µM nafenopin (circles) for 1 h. The cells were then spun down and resuspended in fresh medium containing Me2SO (open symbols) or 20 µM linoleic acid (filled symbols). The incubation was continued at 37 °C and the density of the culture was monitored at hourly intervals by absorbance at 600 nm. An arrow indicates the time point at which linoleic acid was added. The induction of CYP102 protein by nafenopin treatment in this experiment was confirmed by immunoblotting. Shown (in inset) is an immunoblot of lysates from cultures after the 1 h treatment with nafenopin. Me2SO- (Cont) and nafenopin (Naf)-treated cultures are shown. The immunoblot was performed as described in Fig. 4B. The values are from a single representative of more than three independent experiments.

A strain of B. megaterium, G39E, has been isolated with a mutation in the Bm3R1 repressor which can no longer bind to DNA and as a consequence constitutively expresses CYP102 (27). The hypothesis that CYP102 is responsible for the detoxification of the fatty acids would predict that this strain would be more resistant to fatty acid toxicity. This was indeed the case, and the G39E strain was resistant to 20 µM linoleic acid (Fig. 8A). The above experiments indicated that Bm3R1 can mediate resistance to toxic fatty acids. To test further the involvement of CYP102 in the detoxification pathway, we inhibited CYP102 activity using 17-octadecynoic acid (17-ODA). This acetylenic fatty acid is known to specifically and irreversibly inactivate cytochrome P450 fatty acid omega  and omega -1 hydroxylases, including CYP102 (32, 33). Treatment of cultures of the mutant strain with concentrations of 17-ODA that are known to inhibit CYP102 did not affect growth; however, when these cultures were also treated with 20 µM linoleic acid, a marked growth inhibition was observed (Fig. 8B). Therefore, the resistant phenotype of the G39E strain is dependent on the activity of CYP102.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   A, mutation of the Bm3R1 repressor to a non-DNA binding form leads to protection from linoleic acid toxicity. A culture of B. megaterium ATCC14581 (squares) or the G39E mutant strain (circles) was treated with Me2SO (open symbols) or 20 µM linoleic acid (filled symbols), and the density of the culture was monitored by absorbance at 600 nm. The values are from a single representative of three independent experiments. B, inactivation of CYP102 by 17-octadecynoic acid in the mutant strain abolishes the protection from linoleic acid toxicity. A culture of B. megaterium G39E was treated with Me2SO (open squares), 25 µM 17-ODA (open circles), 50 µM 17-ODA (open triangles), 20 µM linoleic acid (filled squares), or 20 µM linoleic acid and 25 µM 17-ODA (filled circles). The density of the culture was monitored by absorbance at 600 nm. The values are from a single representative of three independent experiments.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Many fatty acids, particularly unsaturated fatty acids, are extremely toxic to cells; however, in most cases the mechanism of their toxicity is unknown. In order to survive and utilize these compounds their intracellular concentration needs to be tightly controlled. In this report we have demonstrated that one mechanism of central importance in B. megaterium, with close parallels with mammalian systems, is an adaptive response that leads to fatty acid detoxification. This response results in the induction of a cytochrome P450 fatty acid hydroxylase known as CYP102. The operon encoding CYP102 is controlled by the helix-turn-helix repressor protein, Bm3R1. We have shown that this repressor acts as a fatty acid sensor by binding directly to unsaturated fatty acids and that this binding results in the disruption of the Bm3R1·DNA complex. This is the first report showing gene regulation by unsaturated fatty acids in Bacillus and is also the first report showing direct binding of a prokaryotic transcription factor to free fatty acids. A previous study noted the toxic effects of unsaturated fatty acids on B. megaterium (18) but did not observe induction of CYP102 at the high concentrations used. Other investigators who have studied these toxic effects on B. subtilis have noted that the histidine protein kinase essential for sporulation, KinA, was inhibited by unsaturated fatty acids in vitro (34). However, in vivo studies of the effects of unsaturated fatty acids on the sporulation were also hampered by fatty acid toxicity. Inhibition of KinA by fatty acids exhibited an identical rank order of potency to that observed for toxicity in B. megaterium, i.e. oleic acid > linoleic > linolenic > stearic acid. Indeed the concentrations of each fatty acid required to inhibit KinA in vitro are virtually identical to the concentrations that we have found to be toxic to B. megaterium. We have recently found that B. subtilis is sensitive to linoleic acid toxicity over the same range of concentrations as observed for B. megaterium.3 The genetic and biochemical analysis of the B. subtilis system is in progress.

The exquisite sensitivity to unsaturated fatty acids displayed by B. megaterium and B. subtilis contrasts with the tolerance to high concentrations of unsaturated fatty acids found in both E. coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Both of these latter organisms can utilize unsaturated fatty acids as their sole carbon source at concentrations over 3 orders of magnitude higher than those tolerated by B. megaterium (35-37). Both E. coli and S. cerevisiae display transcriptional responses to fatty acids which increase lipid metabolism. E. coli and Hemophilus influenzae express a transcription factor called FadR that acts as a fatty acid sensor (29, 38). The binding of FadR to DNA is disrupted by fatty acids in an analogous manner to Bm3R1. In contrast to Bm3R1, however, the E. coli FadR protein is relatively nonspecific in its regulation by fatty acids and has only a slight preference for polyunsaturated fatty acids. It is thought that the FadR proteins are regulated in vivo by the acyl-CoA esters of the lipids as there is a 1000-fold difference in the apparent affinity, as judged by gel shift assays, between the free fatty acids and the respective acyl-CoA esters. The situation in B. megaterium is quite different as the induction of CYP102 is highly specific for low micromolar concentrations of polyunsaturated fatty acids, yet saturated and unsaturated acyl-CoA esters are equally as efficient in the inhibition of Bm3R1/DNA binding activity in vitro. These data would suggest that the acyl-CoA esters do not accumulate in vivo to concentrations that are sufficient for the binding of Bm3R1. Indeed, the rate of catalysis mediated by CYP102 is so great that it is likely to be the initial metabolic event for free fatty acids in B. megaterium (19, 39, 40).

The most compelling evidence for the activation of the CYP102 operon by free fatty acids lies in the specificity of the regulation. The specificity of regulation in vivo is totally concordant with the affinity for the repressor of the free fatty acids observed in vitro. However, further genetic analysis of B. megaterium is required to completely rule out the involvement of acyl-CoA esters in the regulation of CYP102.

The role of CYP102 as a fatty acid detoxification enzyme is supported by the finding that either induction or constitutive overexpression of CYP102 results in a high level of fatty acid resistance, and chemical inactivation of CYP102 results in a sensitization to these compounds. CYP102 is one of the most catalytically active cytochrome P450s known, with a turnover number of several thousand catalytical cycles per min, which is about 100 times the average catalytic rate of mammalian cytochrome P450. This extremely high activity is consistent with the attenuation of CYP102 induction after 2 h due to removal of the active fatty acid.

This metabolic pathway therefore generates a regulatory loop where exposure to fatty acids removes the repressor from the CYP102 operator resulting in the induction of CYP102. On induction of the CYP102 the fatty acid is metabolized and no longer binds the Bm3R1 repressor which results in the transcription of CYP102 being switched off. Also, upon activation of the CYP102 operon, Bm3R1 levels are increased which provides an additional "feedback" component for the reimposition of CYP102 repression (22).

One of the most intriguing aspects of this work is the close parallel between the response of B. megaterium and mammalian cells to fatty acids. Many of the chemical agents that induce CYP102 also induce fatty acid hydroxylases in mammals (6, 41). The mammalian system also appears to provide an adaptive response to alterations in fatty acid homeostasis which may protect against their toxic effects by hydroxylation and increased rates of peroxisomal beta -oxidation (7, 42). In mammalian cells this response is mediated by the direct binding of fatty acids to a family of nuclear receptors known as peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (9, 11-13). On this basis, these studies in B. megaterium may be of direct relevance to the understanding of cellular responses to fatty acids in mammalian systems.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Realizing Our Potential Award MOLO4650 from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom reprint requests and correspondence should be addressed: ICRF Molecular Pharmacology Unit, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK. Tel.: 01382-6632621; Fax: 01382-669993.

1 The abbreviations used are: CYP, cytochrome P450; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; 12-AO, 12-anthracene oleic acid; 17-ODA, 17-octadecynoic acid.

2 E. Axen, unpublished data.

3 C. N. A. Palmer, E. Axen, and C. R. Wolf, unpublished data.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Von Euler, V. S. (1936) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 88, 208-218
  2. Burr, G. O., and Burr, M. M. (1930) J. Biol. Chem. 86, 587-621[Free Full Text]
  3. McPhail, L. C., Clayton, C. C., and Snyderman, R. (1984) Science 224, 622-625[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Sagar, P. S., and Das, U. N. (1995) Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids 53, 287-299[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Kliewer, S. A., Lenhard, J. M., Willson, T. M., Patel, I., Morris, D. C., and Lehmann, J. M. (1995) Cell 83, 813-819[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Roman, L. J., Palmer, C. N. A., Clark, J. E., Muerhoff, A. S., Griffin, K. J., Johnson, E. F., and Masters, B. S. (1993) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 307, 57-65[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Bell, D. R., Bars, R. G., and Elcombe, C. R. (1992) Eur. J. Biochem. 206, 979-986[Abstract]
  8. Gibson, G., and Lake, B. (eds) (1993) Peroxisomes: Biology and Importance in Toxicology and Medicine, Taylor & Francis Ltd., London
  9. Lee, S. S., Pineau, T., Drago, J., Lee, E. J., Owens, J. W., Kroetz, D. L., Fernandez, S. P., Westphal, H., and Gonzalez, F. J. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 3012-3022[Abstract]
  10. Dreyer, C., Krey, G., Keller, H., Givel, F., Helftenbein, G., and Wahli, W. (1992) Cell 68, 879-887[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Kliewer, S. A., Sundseth, S. S., Jones, S. A., Brown, P. J., Wisely, G. B., Koble, C. S., Devchand, P., Wahli, W., Willson, T. M., Lenhard, J. M., and Lehmann, J. M. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 4312-4317[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Gottlicher, M., Widmark, E., Li, Q., and Gustafsson, J. A. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 4653-4657[Abstract]
  13. Palmer, C. N. A., Hsu, M. H., Muerhoff, A. S., Griffin, K. J., and Johnson, E. F. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 18083-18089[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. English, N., Hughes, V., and Wolf, C. R. (1996) Biochem. J. 316, 279-283[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Weissbart, D., Salaun, J. P., Durst, F., Pflieger, P., and Mioskowski, C. (1992) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1124, 135-142[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Kaneda, T. (1977) Bacteriol. Rev. 41, 391-418[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Fulco, A. J. (1967) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 144, 701-703[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. English, N., Hughes, V., and Wolf, C. R. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 26836-26841[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Buchanan, J. F., and Fulco, A. J. (1978) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 85, 1254-1260[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Wen, L. P., and Fulco, A. J. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 6676-6682[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Shaw, G. C., and Fulco, A. J. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 2997-3004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. English, N., Palmer, C. N. A., Alworth, W. L., Kang, L., Hughes, V., and Wolf, C. R. (1997) Biochem. J. 316, 279-283
  23. Ruettinger, R. T., Wen, L. P., and Fulco, A. J. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 10987-10995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Shaw, G. C., Sun, C. H., and Chiang, A. (1995) Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int. 37, 1197-1205[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Sha, R. S., Kane, C. D., Xu, Z., Banaszak, L. J., and Bernlohr, D. A. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 7885-7892[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Xu, Z., Bernlohr, D. A., and Banaszak, L. J. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 7874-7884[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Shaw, G. C., and Fulco, A. J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 5515-5526[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Shaw, G. C., Sung, C. H., and Chiang, A. (1996) Curr. Microbiol. 32, 124-128[CrossRef]
  29. DiRusso, C. C. (1988) Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 7995-8009[Abstract]
  30. Henry, M. F., and Cronan, J. J. (1992) Cell 70, 671-679[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. DiRusso, C. C., Heimert, T. L., and Metzger, A. K. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 8685-8691[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Gebremedhin, D., Ma, Y. H., Imig, J. D., Harder, D. R., and Roman, R. J. (1993) J. Vasc. Res. 30, 53-60[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Shirane, N., Sui, Z., Peterson, J. A., and Ortiz de Montellano, P. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 13732-13741[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Strauch, M. A., de Mendoza, D., and Hoch, J. A. (1992) Mol. Microbiol. 6, 2909-2917[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. You, S. Y., Cosloy, S., and Schulz, H. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 16489-16495[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Rottensteiner, H., Kal, A. J., Filipits, M., Binder, M., Hamilton, B., Tabak, H. F., and Ruis, H. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 2924-2934[Abstract]
  37. Karpichev, I. V., Luo, Y., Marians, R. C., and Small, G. M. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 69-80[Abstract]
  38. Fleischmann, R. D., Adams, M. D., White, O., Clayton, R. A., Kirkness, E. F., Kerlavage, A. R., Bult, C. J., Tomb, J. F., Dougherty, B. A., et al.. (1995) Science 269, 496-512[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Capdevila, J. H., Wei, S., Helvig, C., Falck, J. R., Belosludtsev, Y., Truan, G., Graham-Lorence, S. E., and Peterson, J. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 22663-22671[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Miura, Y., and Fulco, A. J. (1974) J. Biol. Chem. 249, 1880-1888[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Palmer, C. N. A., Richardson, T. H., Griffin, K. J., Hsu, M. H., Muerhoff, A. S., Clark, J. E., and Johnson, E. F. (1993) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1172, 161-166[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Devchand, P. R., Keller, H., Peters, J. M., Vazquez, M., Gonzalez, F. J., and Wahli, W. (1996) Nature 384, 39-43[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.