The 67-kDa Enzymatically Inactive Alternatively Spliced Variant of beta -Galactosidase Is Identical to the Elastin/Laminin-binding Protein*

Salvatore PriviteraDagger §, Catherine A. ProdyDagger §, John W. Callahan, and Aleksander HinekDagger §par

From the Divisions of Dagger  Cardiovascular Research and  Neurosciences, The Hospital for Sick Children and the § Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Our previous studies showed immunological and functional similarities, as well as partial sequence homology, between the enzymatically inactive alternatively spliced variant of human beta -galactosidase (S-gal) and the 67-kDa elastin/laminin-binding protein (EBP) from sheep. To define the genetic origin of the EBP further, a full-length human S-gal cDNA clone was constructed and subjected to in vitro transcription/translation. The cDNA was also transfected into COS-1 cells and into the EBP-deficient smooth muscle cells (SMC) from sheep ductus arteriosus (DA). In vitro translation yielded an unglycosylated form of the S-gal protein, which immunoreacted with anti-beta -galactosidase antibodies and bound to elastin and laminin affinity columns. S-gal cDNA transfections into COS-1 and DA SMC increased expression of a 67-kDa protein that immunolocalized intracellularly and to the cell surface and, when extracted from the cells, bound to elastin. The S-gal-transfected cells displayed increased adherence to elastin-covered dishes, consistent with the cell surface distribution of the newly produced S-gal-encoded protein. Transfection of DA SMC additionally corrected their impaired elastic fiber assembly. These results conclusively identify the 67-kDa splice variant of beta -galactosidase as EBP.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Virtually all cell types, including tumor cells, interact with the extracellular matrix (ECM)1 during certain stages of their development. Such contacts may be strictly adhesive or can transduce signals from the ECM to the intracellular machinery (1). These significant cell matrix interactions are mediated through specialized cell surface receptors (2, 3). Interactions between cells and elastin are mediated by a non-integrin cell surface receptor complex consisting of three protein subunits (4-6). Two of these subunits (61- and 55-kDa subunits) are cell membrane-associated proteins that immobilize the third, a 67-kDa peripheral subunit called the elastin-binding protein (EBP). The EBP binds predominantly to the repeating VGVAPG hydrophobic domains on elastin, but it may also bind to other similar hydrophobic domains on elastin (7), and to the LGTIPG sequence on laminin (5, 8). Moreover, the EBP also interacts with moieties containing beta -galactosugars through a separate "lectin-like" binding domain. However, binding of beta -galactosugar-bearing moieties to the lectin domain of the EBP causes such conformational changes in the 67-kDa protein that it loses its affinity for elastin and separates from the other subunits of the elastin receptor. Thus, the EBP can be shed from the cell surface by interactions with galactosugars (galactose, lactose) or with N-acetylgalactosamine-containing glycosaminoglycans (chondroitin sulfate, dermatan sulfate), which bind to its lectin site (9-11). The EBP appears to be directly involved in the generation of intracellular signal transmission after contact with its matrix ligands (6). Binding of elastin-derived peptides to the EBP, when present on the cell surface, resulted in a rapid and transient increase in free intracellular calcium (12, 13), whereas displacement of EBP with either galactose or lactose prevented such an influx. It has been suggested that the elastin receptor-mediated signal transduction involves the G1 protein and the chain activation of phospholipase C and phosphokinase C (14-16). In elastin-producing cells, the EBP was also detected in endosomal compartments and proven to act as a recyclable shuttle protein that binds tropoelastin intracellularly and facilitates its secretion and assembly into elastic fibers (17, 18).

We found that SMC from intimal cushions of the fetal ductus arteriosus (DA) (a shunt between the fetal aorta and the pulmonary artery, which, in preparation for closure shortly after birth, develops intimal "cushions" as a result of massive migration of medial SMC into the subendothelium; see Ref. 19), as well as SMC from atherosclerotic vascular lesions are deficient in EBP (9). This indicated that the lack of this protein may be responsible for SMC detachment from the elastin matrix, hence linking it to transformation of these cells to a synthetic migratory phenotype that underlies vascular thickening and lumenal narrowing common in atherosclerosis (9, 10). Moreover, we have determined that an unoccupied cell surface EBP interferes with binding of interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta ) to its cell surface receptor on arterial SMC and modifies the response of the vascular cells to the endogenous and exogenous cytokine (20, 21).

Our previous studies aimed at detailed characterization of the EBP have established that the EBP isolated from sheep SMC displays immunological, functional, and partial sequence homology to the 67-kDa alternatively spliced variant of human beta -galactosidase described by Morreau and colleagues (22) as a protein with undefined function. This form of beta -galactosidase arises through the splicing out of two non-contiguous protein-encoding regions in such a way that the first deletion introduces a frameshift, which is restored by the deletion of a second region. The net result of these deletions is a shortened protein with the introduction of a 32-amino acid sequence unique to the alternatively spliced form of beta -galactosidase (Fig. 1A). Due to the loss of protein domains encoded by the spliced out exons 3, 4 (region 1), and 6 (region 2), S-gal does not display any enzymatic activity of beta -galactosidase and is not targeted to the lysosomes. Furthermore, we have established that the unique domain of S-gal, encoded by the frameshift-generated sequence, contains an elastin/laminin-binding motif (11).

Our further studies showed that an antibody (anti-S-gal) made to a synthetic oligopeptide corresponding to the elastin/laminin-binding motif of human S-gal showed an identical immunolocalization to the cell surfaces and extracellular elastic fibers as the antibody to EBP (11). Moreover, anti-S-gal co-localized intracellularly with tropoelastin (17). Affinity chromatography of human placenta extract, as well as extracts from sheep aorta SMC on immobilized elastin and laminin, demonstrated that the 67-kDa protein-bound to these affinity columns could be eluted by lactose or gamma -D-galactolactone and immunoreacted with a panel of antibodies recognizing the spliced variant of beta -galactosidase (anti-S-gal, anti-C-gal, and anti-P-gal) and with BCZ (anti-EBP) antibody raised to bovine EBP. Thus, in addition to extensive homology, a similar molecular weight, and immunological cross-reactivity, this enzymatically inactive form of beta -galactosidase also shows elastin- and laminin-binding properties that are identical to those of EBP (11). These data suggested that these proteins are similar and, in fact, may be identical in the same species.

Since the sheep beta -gal gene has not yet been characterized, the conclusive proof of the genetic origin of the EBP remained to be established. Therefore, the major objective of the present study was to provide evidence of the identity between S-gal and EBP. Thus, the full-length cDNA clone encoding the alternatively spliced variant of human beta -galactosidase was constructed and used in a series of in vitro transcription/translation experiments and transfected into COS-1 cells, which express very low levels of beta -gal and S-gal (24), and into the EBP-deficient sheep DA SMC (9) to overexpress the S-gal-encoded protein and to determine whether its structural and functional features will match those of the 67-kDa EBP.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Materials-- Kits, chemicals, DNA, and reagents were obtained as follows. The pBluescript SK+ was obtained from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA). The luciferase construct (TKSL) was kindly provided by Dr. Harry Elsholtz (University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario (ON), Canada). The plasmid pSVL SV40 was obtained from Pharmacia Biotech Inc. (Baie d'Urfe, Quebec, Canada). All restriction enzymes were from New England Biolabs (Mississauga, ON, Canada). Gel purification was conducted using the Geneclean II Kit from BIO 101 Inc. (Vista, CA). DNA sequencing was done with the Sequenase version 2.0 DNA sequencing kit from Amersham Canada Ltd. (Oakville, ON, Canada). In vitro transcription and translation kits were supplied by Promega (Madison, WI). [35S]Methionine (1200 Ci/mmol) was obtained from ICN Radiochemicals (Irvine, CA). Radioactive signals were enhanced using Amplify from Amersham Canada Ltd. (Oakville, ON, Canada). Kodak X-Omat AR film was used for autoradiography (Eastman Kodak Co.). Bovine ligamentum nuchae insoluble elastin, kappa -elastin, and the polyclonal antibody to bovine tropoelastin (23), were purchased from Elastin Products Co., Inc. (Owensville, MI). Soluble laminin isolated from Engelbreth-Holm-Swarm tumor and anti-laminin antibody were obtained from Sigma. Collagen type I (Vitrogen 100®) was from Collagen Biomaterials (Palo Alto, CA). Lactose, proteinase inhibitors (EDTA, phenylmethylslfonyl fluoride, and leupeptin), Protein A-Sepharose beads, bovine albumin, and all reagent grade chemicals were purchased from Sigma. alpha -Minimal essential medium (alpha -MEM), fetal calf serum, and other tissue culture reagents were obtained from Life Technologies, Inc. (Burlington, ON, Canada). Assays for total protein concentration were done using the Bio-Rad protein assay kit. Luciferin for the luciferase assay was from Sigma. All SDS-PAGE reagents were purchased from Bio-Rad. The Immobilon P transfer membranes were supplied by Millipore Ltd. (Mississauga, ON). Affinity-purified polyclonal antibodies: anti-S-gal (raised to a synthetic peptide mimicking the elastin/laminin-binding sequence, present in the unique, frameshift-encoded fragment of the 67-kDa spliced variant of beta -gal) and anti-C-gal (raised to a synthetic peptide reflecting the C-terminal end of the beta -gal precursor), as well as anti-P-gal (an affinity-purified polyclonal antibody to the human beta -galactosidase precursor), were produced in our laboratories (11, 24). The cDNA clone of beta -gal in pGEM-3Z and the COS-1 cells have been described previously (25). The BCZ monoclonal antibody to the bovine 67-kDa elastin-binding protein (26) was from Dr. R. P. Mecham (Washington University, St. Louis, MO). A monoclonal antibody to fibronectin (mAb1940) was purchased by Chemicon (Temecula, CA). Species and type-specific secondary antibodies, donkey anti-rabbit F(ab') and goat anti-mouse antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase, and the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) Western blotting detection kit were obtained from Amersham Canada Ltd. (Oakville, ON, Canada). Fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-mouse and goat anti-rabbit secondary antibodies were obtained from ICN Immunobiologicals (Lisle, IL).

Construction of the Full-length S-gal cDNA Clone-- To construct the full-length alternatively spliced cDNA clone (1986 bp) reflecting the sequence described by Morreau and colleagues (22), poly(A)+ mRNA was isolated from cultured normal human skin fibroblasts using a Quick Prep mRNA purification kit from Pharmacia. This mRNA (500 ng) was reverse-transcribed using random hexamers and superscript reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Inc.). To isolate overlapping fragments of the cDNA, two polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were carried out. The 5' portion of the cDNA (357 bp) was amplified using the primers 5'-GGTGGTCATGCCGGGGTTCCT-3' and 5'-ATGTTGCTGCCTGCACTGTT-3'. The primers 5'-CCATCCAGACATTACCTGGC-3' and 5'-CCCTCACACATTCCAGGTGGT-3' were used to amplify the 3' fragment of the cDNA (1598 bp). The reactions were carried out on a Perkin-Elmer thermal cycler using an annealing temperature of 55 °C. The fragments were gel-purified and ligated into the EcoRV site of pBluescript SK+. The respective fragments contained a 115-bp overlapping sequence at their respective 3' and 5' ends (see Fig. 1B). In addition, the absence of the initial 27 bp located at the 5' end of the 5' fragment and 119 bp at the 3' end of the 3' fragment was detected (attributed to primer positioning in the initial PCR reaction). Final assembly of the full-length clone eliminated the overlapping segment by employing a common PvuII site found in the overlapping region between the two portions of S-gal. Complete double digestion of the 5' clone with the restriction enzymes KpnI and PvuII yielded a 316-bp fragment representing the 5' segment (i.e.. 5' to the PvuII site) of S-gal, which included an additional 57 bp of vector at its 5' end. The KpnI digestion created a 3' overhang, which was blunt-ended by using Pfu DNA polymerase. The 316-bp 5' fragment and a PvuII-digested 3' clone were then both agarose gel-purified, gene-cleaned, and ligated. The ligation products were transformed into bacterial cells (27) and grown on LB-AMP plates. Restriction digests with XhoI and PvuII confirmed the correct orientation of the short 5' segment of S-gal in the new construct.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   A, a schematic illustrating that the non-sequential alternative splicing of the primary transcript of the beta -galactosidase gene generates two mRNAs, one encoding the precursor of the lysosomal enzyme (beta -gal) and the second encoding an enzymatically inactive protein (S-gal), which is not targeted to the lysosomes. In the S-gal-encoding mRNA, exons 3, 4, and 6 are spliced out, and exon 5 is shifted in frame, thus creating an unique region encoding a 32-amino acid sequence in S-gal, which differs from its counterpart encoded by exon 5 of active beta -gal (22), and contains an elastin/laminin-binding domain (bold and underlined) (11). B, the full-length S-gal cDNA clone was constructed according to the strategy depicted in this schematic and described in detail under "Experimental Procedures."

To avoid sequencing the newly constructed clone in its entirety and to insert the missing 5' 27 bp and the 3' 119 bp, segments on either side of the frameshifted region were replaced with their wild type counterparts. These segments are identical to those found in the wild type beta -gal cDNA, which was the source of these fragments. Using EcoRI and XbaI sites, located within and 3' to the insert respectively, a large segment was removed from the constructed clone and replaced by the corresponding fragment (which included the missing 119-bp segment of the 3'-untranslated region) isolated from wild type beta -gal. From this modified clone, another double digest was conducted to remove an even larger fragment that included the entire frameshifted region along with the 3' long portion of S-gal. The corresponding fragment was excised from the wild type beta -gal clone using the restriction enzymes Cfr10I (BsrFI) and XbaI and was replaced by this S-gal cDNA segment. This ensured that the segment 5' to the frameshifted region is error-free and complete (the 27-bp missing fragment is also added here yielded the full-length S-gal cDNA). Sequencing was done to ensure that insertion and frame were correct.

In Vitro Transcription/Translation of the S-gal cDNA Clone-- In vitro transcription/translation was done in accordance to the protocols provided by Promega. S-gal cDNA (5 µg) in pGEM-3Z was linearized (digested with XbaI), and in vitro transcription was conducted. This was followed by in vitro translation using 2 µl of RNA substrate in a nuclease-treated rabbit reticulocyte lysate (minus microsomal membranes and protease inhibitors) in the presence of 0.8 mCi/ml [35S]methionine ([35S]Met). The translation mix (minus mRNA) was used as control. In vitro transcription/translation of the cDNA clone encoding the wild type beta -galactosidase precursor (24) was also conducted for comparison. The supernatants were directly analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), followed by autoradiography to detect for the presence of [35S]Met-labeled reaction products and to compare molecular size. The reaction products were further characterized using immunoprecipitation with antibodies recognizing beta -gal, S-gal, and EBP, and then by elastin and laminin affinity columns.

Immunoprecipitation-- Immunoprecipitation (IP) of the [35S]Met-labeled translation product was assessed with our well characterized anti-S-gal, anti-C-gal (11, 25), and anti-P-gal antibodies (24). The preimmune rabbit serum was used as a control. Briefly, the supernatants from the in vitro translation reactions (one volume) were mixed with two volumes of IP buffer (10 mM Tris-buffered saline, pH 7.4, containing 0.2% bovine serum albumin, 0.3% Nonidet P-40, 0.3% sodium deoxycholate, and 0.02% sodium azide) and precleaned by incubation for 1 h at 4 °C with normal rabbit serum (2 µg/µl) and then, for 30 min, with two volumes of Protein A-Sepharose beads (0.1 ml of beads/ml of IP buffer) to remove any nonspecific immunocomplexes. The supernatants were then incubated at 4 °C with either antibody (2 µg/µl) for 2 h and subsequently with two volumes of Protein A beads for 1 h. The beads were washed three times in IP buffer by centrifugation, and then the final pellets were resuspended in SDS sample buffer with 20 mM DTT, boiled for 5 min, resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE, and detected by autoradiography.

Elastin/Laminin Affinity Columns-- To assess the ECM-binding properties of the [35S]Met-labeled in vitro translation product, one volume of the incubation product was mixed with two volumes of IP buffer containing a 1 mg/ml suspension of each of powdered insoluble elastin, insoluble collagen type I, and soluble laminin, and incubated for 30 min at 4 °C. The slurry of insoluble elastin and collagen was then pelleted by centrifugation. The soluble laminin was immunoprecipitated using consecutive incubations with 2 µg/ml polyclonal anti-laminin antibody and two volumes of Protein A-Sepharose beads, as described above. The resulting pellets containing the affinity-bound ligands were rinsed in IP buffer, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and analyzed by autoradiography as above.

Transfections of COS-1 Cells with the Full-length S-gal cDNA and Characterization of the S-gal-encoded Protein Product-- Transient transfections of the S-gal cDNA clone into COS-1 cells, which express low levels of beta -gal and S-gal (24), were conducted in accordance with a DEAE-dextran protocol (28) modified to include adenovirus addition. The full-length S-gal cDNA was excised from pGEM-3Z using SalI digestion and ligated into the mammalian expression vector pSVL SV40 previously digested with XhoI. A series of digestions with the site-specific restriction enzymes (SmaI and DraIII) confirmed frame and orientation of the S-gal clone. COS-1 cells were plated evenly in the 100-mm dishes (10 × 106 cells/dish) and in 20-mm dishes containing coverslips (1 × 106/dish) and maintained in alpha -MEM supplemented with 1% antibiotics/antimycotics and 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum for 2 days before transfections were carried out. The transfection mixture consisted of 5% (0.25 ml) adenovirus deletion-325 (approximately 2 × 108 plaque-forming units/ml), 80% (4 ml) serum-free alpha -MEM, 8 µg of S-gal cDNA in pSVL, 8 µg of TKSL, 10% (0.5 ml) alpha -MEM + 10% fetal calf serum, and 1.6% (80 µl) DEAE-dextran (5 mg/ml). Control cultures (no DNA, vector alone, wild type beta -gal alone; each including TKSL) were treated in the same manner. The cells were then harvested from 72-h cultures, and a luciferase assay was conducted to monitor transfection efficiency (29). The production of the S-gal encoded protein in control and S-gal-transfected cells was assessed by immunohistochemistry and immunoblotting, while its elastin-binding capability was tested by affinity chromatography and an in vitro adhesion assay.

Immunostaining-- The presence and distribution of S-gal in the control and S-gal-transfected cells were then compared 72 h after transfection using immunostaining with anti-P-gal, anti-S-gal, and anti-EBP (BCZ) antibodies. Cultures of transfected cells from each experimental group (maintained in small dishes with coverslips) were fixed at -20 °C in 100% methanol for 30 min, rinsed with water and PBS, after which the separate coverslips were incubated for 1 h with PBS-diluted primary antibodies (2 µg/µl) followed by a 1-h incubation with the appropriate fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse secondary antibodies. An additional 10-min incubation with propidium iodide (0.1 µg/ml) assured nuclear counterstaining. The coverslips were mounted on glass slides with elvanol and analyzed using an Olympus Vanox AH BT3 fluorescence microscope.

Western Blotting of COS-1 Cell Lysates-- 72 h after transfection, the cells maintained in 100-mm dishes were rinsed in PBS and harvested by scraping. The pelleted cells were then lysed in 200 µl of PBS containing 0.25% n-octyl-beta -D-glucopyranoside, 0.1 M lactose, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylslfonyl fluoride, 20 µM leupeptin, and freeze-thawed (10 times). The insoluble remnants were pelleted by centrifugation (14,000 rpm/25 min), and the supernatants were resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE. 100 µg of total protein was loaded into each well. The proteins were then electrotransferred to Immobilon P membranes and analyzed by Western blotting with 2 µg/ml anti-P-gal antibody, which also recognizes EBP (11) followed by a donkey anti-rabbit F(ab')2 (horseradish peroxidase-labeled) secondary antibody diluted 1:5000 and ECL.

Elastin Affinity Columns-- To assess the elastin-binding capability of the S-gal-encoded protein produced in COS-1 cells, equal amounts of lysates (200 µg of total protein) (same lysate as used in the Western blot above) were incubated with 5 mg of insoluble elastin (1 mg/ml in PBS) for 2 h at 4 °C. The elastin slurry was then pelleted by centrifugation, rinsed with PBS, and then resuspended in SDS sample buffer with 20 mM DTT. The elastin-bound proteins released to the buffer were resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blotting using anti-P-gal antibody, as described above.

Adhesion Assay-- The elastin-binding capabilities of S-gal-transfected and control cells were tested in an in vitro assay using elastin coated wells on 96-well plates.

Cells transfected with vector alone, with wild type beta -gal, or with S-gal constructs were gently scraped from their culture dishes 72 h after transfection, quickly centrifuged (1000 rpm), resuspended in 2 ml of medium, and counted using a hemocytometer. Equal numbers of cells (three trials ranging from 1500 to 7000 cells/well) from all groups were suspended in 200 µl of medium and plated in sextuplicate in 96-well culture dishes that were either uncoated or coated with bovine albumin, with collagen type I, or with kappa -elastin (all in concentration 100 µg/well). The cells were incubated at 37 °C for 4 h and then the media containing non-attached cells were removed, the wells were rinsed (twice) with PBS, and the remaining attached cells were fixed in 100 µl of 10% formalin for 30 min. The cells were then rinsed (twice) with water and stained with crystal violet for 30 min. After several washes in water, 100 µl of 1 M hydrochloric acid was added to each well to lyse the cells and release the retained crystal violet into solution. The absorbance, proportional to the number of attached cells (A540), was assessed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay reader. The exact number of attached cells was then calculated from an A540 standard curve constructed with serial dilutions of untreated COS-1 cells.

Transfections of DA SMC with the Full-length S-gal cDNA-- Since SMC from the late gestation ductus arteriosus have been shown to be deficient in EBP and incapable of normal elastic fiber assembly (despite the normal production of tropoelastin) and attachment to elastic fibers (9), we speculated that effective transfection of these cells with the S-gal clone may confer EBP expression and restore a normal SMC phenotype.

Transient transfections (vector alone, wild type beta -gal, and S-gal; each with TKSL) of passage two SMC isolated from 100-day sheep DA (10 × 106 cells/100-mm dish and 1 × 106 cells/20-mm dish) were carried out, in accordance with a calcium phosphate protocol (30). The S-gal-protein expression was then assessed 72 h after transfection by immunostaining and by Western blotting, as described above and indicated in the figure legends. The transfected cells (30,000 cells/well plated in quadruplicate on a 24-well dish) were also tested for their ability to adhere to plastic, albumin, collagen type I, and elastin (all in a concentration of 500 µg/well), 4 h after the initial plating, as described above. Separate cultures maintained for 7 days after transfection to allow for production of extracellular matrix were fixed in 100% methanol and production of elastic fibers, as well as deposition of extracellular fibronectin were assessed after immunostaining with specific antibodies as described previously (9, 18, 21).

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

In Vitro Transcription/Translation of the S-gal cDNA Resulted in the Synthesis of an Elastin/Laminin-binding Protein-- In vitro transcription/translation of the full-length S-gal cDNA resulted in the synthesis of a protein with a molecular weight of approximately 60,000 (Fig. 2A), consistent with the primary sequence deduced by Morreau and colleagues (22). In addition to the 60-kDa [35S]Met-labeled reaction product, autoradiography also detected several lower molecular weight bands, probably representing degradation products and/or incomplete translation products. The control reaction (i.e. no DNA added) did not show any species corresponding to a labeled product encoded by the S-gal cDNA clone.


View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   The in vitro transcription/translation of the S-gal cDNA produces a 60-kDa protein. A, an autoradiogram of SDS-PAGE shows a [35S]methionine-labeled protein product of the in vitro transcription/translation of the S-gal cDNA. The uppermost band corresponds to a 60-kDa protein. Lower banding is possibly due to S-gal degradation and/or incomplete S-gal translation products. In the control, no mRNA was added to the translation reaction. B, SDS-PAGE/autoradiography indicates that anti-P-gal, anti-C-gal, and anti-S-gal antibodies immunoprecipitate an identical 60-kDa [35S]methionine-labeled product of in vitro transcription/translation encoded by the S-gal cDNA clone. C, an autoradiogram of SDS-PAGE shows the [35S]methionine-labeled products of the in vitro transcription/translation of the S-gal and beta -gal cDNA clones, which were immunoprecipitated with an anti-P-gal antibody. S-gal and beta -gal cDNA clones encode distinct (60 and 76 kDa), but immunologically related, proteins, which correspond to the unglycosylated version of S-gal and the beta -gal precursor, respectively. D, SDS-PAGE/autoradiography shows that the 60-kDa protein produced by in vitro transcription/translation of the S-gal cDNA binds to elastin and laminin but not to collagen type I. The supernatants containing the [35S]methionine-labeled products of in vitro translation were chromatographed as described under "Experimental Procedures." The elastin- and laminin-bound proteins were released from their association with those ECM ligands by boiling in sample buffer containing SDS and DTT.

Additional immunoprecipitations of the S-gal cDNA-encoded protein with anti-S-gal (raised to a synthetic peptide mimicking the elastin/laminin-binding sequence of human S-gal), anti-C-gal (raised to a synthetic peptide reflecting the C-terminal end of the beta -gal precursor), and anti-P-gal (raised to the human beta -galactosidase precursor) antibodies, also yielded a 60-kDa metabolically labeled protein (Fig. 2B) and confirmed its relationship to beta -galactosidase. Further immunoprecipitation of the in vitro transcription/translation products with the anti-P-gal antibody clearly documented that the S-gal and the wild type beta -gal cDNA clones encode distinct but immunologically related proteins. SDS-PAGE/autoradiography showed that the immunoprecipitated product encoded by the beta -gal cDNA clone resolved with an apparent molecular weight of 76,000, corresponding with the deduced primary sequence of the beta -gal precursor (Fig. 2C). Most importantly, when applied to elastin and laminin affinity matrices, the 60-kDa S-gal-encoded protein was retained but it was not bound by collagen type I (Fig. 2D).

The S-gal cDNA Clone Transfected into COS-1 Cells Increased Expression of the Elastin-binding Protein-- Although the 60-kDa S-gal cDNA-encoded product from in vitro translation displayed both properties of S-gal and EBP, it was necessary to define further if the S-gal protein would hold these properties after final processing in these primate (COS-1) cells. To achieve this, we transiently expressed the S-gal cDNA in COS-1 cells. A luciferase assay confirmed successful transfection in all experimental groups. Cells transfected with luciferase construct only displayed 3202 RLU, vector-transfected cells 44,891 RLU, beta -gal-transfected cells 4049 RLU, and S-gal-transfected cells 8662 RLU.

Immunostaining of S-gal-transfected and control COS-1 cells with anti-S-gal, anti-P-gal, and BCZ (raised to bovine EBP) antibodies demonstrated increased endosomal and cell surface expression of an immunoreactive protein (data not shown). Mock-transfected (no added DNA) and vector-transfected cells showed very low cell surface immunoreactivity with all three antibodies.

Increased expression of the S-gal-encoded protein was also confirmed when the extracts of S-gal cDNA-transfected cultures were analyzed by immunoblotting with the anti-P-gal antibody and compared with controls (Fig. 3A). The immunoreactive overexpressed protein had a molecular size of 67 kDa. Densitometric assessments of the 67-kDa anti-P-gal-immunoreactive bands additionally normalized to RLU (reflecting the transfection efficiency in particular COS-1 cultures) indicated its approximate 8-12-fold increase, as compared with all controls. The molecular size of this protein certainly corresponds to a mature S-gal (22) and to the EBP (4). In contrast, transfection of COS-1 cells with the wild type beta -gal cDNA clone resulted in a substantial increase in expression of an anti-P-gal immunoreactive 85-kDa protein, corresponding to the beta -gal precursor, and a less abundant 64-kDa mature beta -gal (24) (Fig. 3A).


View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Western blot with anti-P-gal antibody of non-transfected, vector-transfected, beta -gal-transfected, and S-gal-transfected COS-1 cell lysates. A, a substantial increase in the expression of a 67-kDa protein is observed in the S-gal-transfected cells as compared with all three controls. Cells transfected with the wild type beta -gal cDNA clone reveal the expression of the 85-kDa precursor form of active beta -gal along with a lesser abundance of the fully processed mature form. B, affinity chromatography of cell lysates incubated with insoluble elastin indicates that only the S-gal-transfected cells (but not their control, vector-, or beta -gal-transfected counterparts) produced a large amount of the 67-kDa protein, which binds to elastin and is immunoreactive with anti-P-gal antibody.

Moreover, elastin affinity of transfected COS-1 cell extracts revealed that the insoluble elastin retained the 67-kDa immunoreactive protein from the extracts of S-gal-transfected cells, but not from controls (Fig. 3B). These results clearly indicate that the overexpressed 67-kDa protein produced by the S-gal-transfected cells has an elastin-binding capability, whereas the wild type beta -gal transfection product does not.

Since cellular attachment to elastic matrices depends on the presence of EBP on the cell surface (10), an in vitro adhesion assay was conducted to determine whether transient expression of S-gal would increase the ability of COS-1 cells to adhere to elastin-coated dishes. Three parallel experiments showed that approximately 4 times more of the S-gal-transfected cells attached to elastin-coated dishes (4 h after initial plating) than cells transfected with the vector alone or those transfected with the beta -gal clone (Fig. 4). This S-gal-dependent increase in cellular attachment to elastin did not depend on the initial density of plating, in the tested range 1500-7000 cells/well (96-well dish). The specificity of the S-gal dependent attachment to elastin was illustrated by the fact that S-gal cDNA-transfected cells did not increase their attachment when plated on plastic, albumin, or collagen type I (Fig. 4).


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   S-gal transfection of COS-1 cells led to their increased adherence to elastin-covered surfaces. COS-1 cells (control and transfected) were plated in sextuplicate into wells of plastic dishes (initial density 1500 cells/well), which were either untreated (plastic) or covered with albumin, collagen type I, or elastin (as described under "Experimental Procedures"). The data display cell numbers (±S.E.) attached to wells covered with different ligands, 4 h after plating.

These results (together with cell surface immunostaining) further suggest that this overexpressed S-gal-encoded protein is properly transported to the cell surface and facilitates cellular adhesion to elastin-coated plates. Therefore, this S-gal-encoded protein fulfills the role that, to date, has only been attributed to EBP (6).

S-gal cDNA Transfections of DA SMC Increases Expression of EBP and Affects Deposition of Extracellular Matrix-- A luciferase assay indicated an efficient and rather uniform transfection in all experimental groups. Immunostaining with anti-P-gal antibody of the S-gal cDNA-transfected DA SMC cultures showed numerous cells with a vividly increased expression of immunoreactive material, localized predominantly to the cell surface. As depicted in Fig. 5 (upper panel), immunostaining with anti-P-gal antibody detected mostly intracellular epitopes localized to the lysosomes and cisternas in cells transfected with the wild type beta -gal clone, while cells transfected with the S-gal clone expressed a cell surface localized protein immunoreactive with the same antibody. These data were consistent with the fact that the lysate of the S-gal-transfected cells demonstrated a substantial increase in the expression of a 67-kDa protein immunoreactive with the anti-S-gal antibody on a Western blot (Fig. 6). Densitometric assessments of the 67-kDa bands depicted in Fig. 6, additionally normalized to RLU (reflecting the transfection efficiency), indicated an approximate 10-fold increase in expression, as compared with controls. Furthermore, the S-gal-transfected DA SMC demonstrated a 5-fold increase in the number of cells attached to elastin-coated plates (4 h after initial plating), as compared with controls (Fig. 7). There was no statistically significant difference in adhesion between vector-, beta -gal-, and S-gal-transfected cells when plated on plastic alone, albumin, or collagen type I (data not shown). Most interestingly, the immunocytochemistry of 7-day-old cultures revealed that S-gal-transfected DA SMC were capable of normal elastic fiber assembly, while the vector- (data not shown) and beta -gal-transfected cells did not deposit elastic fibers in the newly produced matrix (Fig. 5, middle panel). Moreover, the extracellular matrix produced by the S-gal-transfected DA SMC showed very little immunodetectable fibronectin, while beta -gal-transfected cells deposited an abundance of fibronectin (Fig. 5, lower panel). This result is consistent with the previously described mechanism implicating the cell surface EBP as a blocker of the adjacent IL-1 receptor type I, which transduces signals (evoked by endogenous IL-1beta ), leading to the up-regulation of fibronectin synthesis and secretion in vascular SMC (20, 21).


View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Immunolocalization of EBP, elastin, and fibronectin in cultures of DA SMC transfected with beta -gal and S-gal cDNA clones. Top panel, the beta -gal-transfected cells exhibit mostly intracellular localization of anti-P-gal-immunoreactive material, which in addition to EBP also represents active beta -galactosidase localized to the lysosomes. The S-gal-transfected cells demonstrate a considerable increase in the expression of anti-P-gal-immunoreactive material on the cell surface. Middle panel, immunostaining with an anti-tropoelastin antibody shows that extracellular matrix produced by 7-day-old cultures of beta -gal-transfected DA SMC does not contain any organized elastin, while S-gal-transfected cells demonstrate normal assembly of elastic fibers. Lower panel, the extracellular matrix produced by beta -gal-transfected DA SMC contains an abundance of fibronectin (FN) detected with a monoclonal anti-fibronectin antibody. Production of fibronectin in cultures of S-gal-transfected cells is greatly reduced.


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   The S-gal cDNA-transfected DA SMC exhibit increased expression of the elastin-binding protein. The Western blot with anti-S-gal antibody shows that the S-gal cDNA-transfected DA SMC produced an abundance of the 67-kDa immunoreactive protein as compared with controls. The cell lysates were chromatographed on insoluble elastin as described under "Experimental Procedures." The elastin-bound protein was released from its insoluble ligand by boiling in sample buffer containing SDS and DTT.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   S-gal transfection of DA SMC led to their increased adhesion to elastin-covered surfaces as compared with vector and beta -gal-transfected controls. The graph shows the number of cells attached to elastin-covered wells (±S.E.) 4 h after plating of 30,000 cells/well.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Despite comprehensive functional characterization of the elastin-binding protein (EBP) (4-6, 9, 10), its structure has not been determined. In 1993, after tryptic digestion of sheep EBP, we noted (11) that in addition to several oligopeptides fully homologous to human beta -galactosidase, a 14-amino acid sequence, obtained from cyanogen bromide digestion, contained 50% direct homology (and an additional three amino acids, which could be substituted without change in net charge) with a unique sequence (encoded by the frameshifted exon 5) of the alternatively spliced catalytically inactive variant of human beta -galactosidase (S-gal) originally described by Morreau et al. (22) and confirmed by Yamamoto et al. (32). Subsequent studies showed further immunological and functional similarities between these two proteins (6, 11, 17, 18, 31). We have shown that both extracts of human placenta and extracts of sheep arterial SMC contained a 67-kDa protein which bound to elastin and laminin affinity columns and could be eluted from those columns with several galactosugars. These elastin/laminin-binding proteins, isolated from both human and sheep tissues, were equally immunoreactive with anti-P-gal, anti-C-gal, and anti-S-gal antibodies, as well as with the monoclonal BCZ antibody raised to bovine EBP (11). In addition to identical patterns of immunostaining assessed under light and electron microscopy, we also found that anti-S-gal antibody co-localized with intracellular tropoelastin and with extracellular elastic fibers in ovine arteries (17, 18). Moreover, the treatment of cultured ovine aortic SMC with anti-S-gal antibody (recognizing and blocking to elastin-binding domain of S-gal) caused impaired assembly of elastic fibers (18).

To demonstrate that S-gal and EBP are indeed the same protein, the cDNA clone for S-gal was required. Thus, the full-length clone was constructed after precise trimming and ligation of two separate and partially overlapping cDNA fragments pulled out from human fibroblast mRNA. Sequencing of the final PCR product showed that the resulting clone was in frame and error-free as compared with the described original S-gal cDNA (22).

In attempting to determine if S-gal and EBP are really the same protein, we undertook a series of studies to characterize the properties of the S-gal-cDNA encoded protein and to determine the degree to which it displayed the features attributed to date to EBP. As a first step, we employed in vitro transcription/translation and obtained a protein of approximately 60,000 (Fig. 2), which corresponded well to the 60-kDa unglycosylated version of S-gal, as deduced from its primary sequence described by Morreau et al. (22). For comparison, we also tested the wild type beta -gal cDNA clone. SDS-PAGE/autoradiography revealed that both proteins were immunoprecipitable with polyclonal anti-P-gal antibody (which recognizes common epitopes in both spliced variants of beta -gal), but differed in their molecular size (Fig. 2C). The S-gal-encoded protein had a molecular mass of 60 kDa, whereas the 76-kDa, beta -gal-encoded product was consistent with the deduced size of an unglycosylated and unprocessed precursor of beta -gal (22). Moreover, only the 60-kDa S-gal cDNA-encoded product immunoprecipitated with an anti-S-gal antibody, raised to an unique sequence present in the frameshift-generated domain of S-gal. In addition, the 60-kDa protein produced by in vitro translation was also immunoprecipitable with anti-C-gal antibody, which recognizes a C-terminal domain present in the beta -gal precursor and S-gal, but cleaved off from the mature form of the active enzyme (Fig. 2B).

The most important test for the S-gal-encoded protein was its relation to EBP, as judged by its functional ability to bind to elastin and laminin. We demonstrated that the 60-kDa, S-gal-encoded product efficiently bound to these two matrix ligands but not to collagen type I (Fig. 2D). This result confirmed the tight protein-protein associative character of the elastin-S-gal and laminin-S-gal binding, suggested by our previous studies (11), and additionally showed that such an association does not require glycosylation or other post-translational modification of S-gal.

Since these data indicated that the S-gal produced is immunologically the same as EBP, and has the ability to bind both elastin and laminin, subsequent experiments were aimed at determining whether the protein, when expressed in mammalian cells, displayed additional properties of EBP. First, we tested whether transfection of the primate COS-1 cells with the S-gal cDNA clone would increase expression of the fully processed 67-kDa S-gal protein and then whether this overexpressed protein would localize to the cell surface and serve as a functional EBP by mediating interactions of the transfected cells with elastin. Indeed, affinity chromatography confirmed a substantial increase in the amount of the 67-kDa elastin-bound protein retained from extracts of the S-gal-transfected COS-1 cells as compared with controls (Fig. 3B). The 67-kDa protein overexpressed by S-gal-transfected COS-1 cells was immunoreactive with anti-P-gal antibody, which also recognized the 85-kDa beta -gal precursor overexpressed in the beta -gal-transfected cells, on Western blots (Fig. 3A). We therefore concluded that the S-gal cDNA-encoded protein, which resolves with an identical (67-kDa) molecular mass when produced in COS-1 cells, likely undergoes post-translational modifications comparable to the spliced variant of beta -gal synthesized in normal cells (22). It also has the elastin-binding capabilities identical to EBP isolated from sheep vascular SMC or from human placenta (11). Immunostaining with anti-P-gal, anti-S-gal, and BCZ antibodies (each recognizes EBP) revealed that cultures of S-gal-transfected COS-1 cells contained clusters of cells with increased expression of intracellular and cell surface-localized immunoreactive protein, as compared with controls. Moreover, patterns of immunostaining were identical to those of EBP in normal aortic SMC (9, 11).

Although both beta -gal and S-gal contain identical signal peptides, which targets these proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum, the cell surface localization of the S-gal encoded protein indicates that this variant, directly translated in COS-1 cells, does not contain the putative lysosomal targeting domain (mannose 6-phosphate receptor-binding domain) present in the precursor of active beta -gal. Since the exact location of this lysosomal targeting domain in the precursor of active beta -gal has not been conclusively determined, one can speculate that such a critical aspect of this targeting requirement must be supplied by one, or a combination, of the exons (exons 3, 4, or 6) that are spliced out in the S-gal variant. Our results affirm that the newly produced S-gal proceeds through the secretory pathways of transfected COS-1 cells, where it is prepared for its release to the cell surface. Currently, we do not know whether the S-gal protein overexpressed in COS-1 cells associates with the two other 55-kDa and 61-kDa subunits of the elastin receptor. Immobilization of S-gal on the cell surface suggests, however, that such an association, which was recently documented by double and triple immunostaining of vascular SMC,2 is most probable. The increased expression of the functional elastin-binding protein was additionally confirmed by an adhesion assay, which showed significant increases in the number of S-gal-transfected cells attached to elastin-covered plates, as compared with controls (Fig. 4). An increase in specific adherence to elastin (but not to plastic, albumin, and collagen type I) documents that the newly produced S-gal-encoded protein was transferred to the cell surface where it can play a role previously ascribed to EBP, thereby mediating ligand-specific cell/matrix interactions.

Further studies with EBP-deficient DA SMC, which are characterized by poor attachment to elastin, impaired elastic fiber assembly (despite normal production of tropoelastin), and abundant fibronectin expression (which stimulates their migratory capabilities in neointima) (9, 10, 20, 21), also confirmed the functional significance of S-gal transfection. Only S-gal cDNA-transfected DA SMC (but not vector- or beta -gal cDNA-transfected cells) displayed a substantial increase in the expression of a 67-kDa protein immunoreactive with anti-S-gal antibody (Fig. 6) and additionally demonstrated a significant increase in attachment to elastin coated plates (Fig. 7). Furthermore, 7-day old cultures of S-gal-transfected cells demonstrated focal accumulation of elastic fibers, which were virtually not visible in control cultures of DA SMC. Thus, the restoration of normal elastic fiber assembly by DA SMC can be clearly linked to overexpression of the 67-kDa S-gal-encoded protein, indicating that this variant of beta -gal plays the identical role as the previously described EBP, the presence of which is imperative for proper secretion and assembly of tropoelastin into elastic fibers (9, 17, 18). Interestingly, the increased cell surface expression of the anti-P-gal-reactive protein in clusters of the S-gal-transfected (but not beta -gal-transfected) DA SMC coincided with a substantial decrease in the pericellular deposition of fibronectin. This effect seems to be consistent with the previously described ability of the EBP to inhibit the IL-1beta -dependent autocrine/paracrine stimulation of fibronectin synthesis by blocking the adjacent IL-1 receptor type I present on surface of vascular SMC (21).

Thus, all the above described cellular effects linked to the increased expression of S-gal are entirely consistent with the previously described effects mediated by EBP (6, 9, 17, 18, 21, 31).

In summary, our results conclusively identify the S-gal-encoded protein as EBP, the protein that plays an important role in vascular development and deficiency of which may contribute to impaired elastic fiber assembly and the SMC detachment from the extracellular matrix and migration in vascular diseases. Moreover, we demonstrated the overexpression of functional EBP in S-gal-transfected vascular SMC deficient in EBP. This may lead to the development of new therapeutic strategies, based on local in vivo S-gal cDNA delivery to neointimal vascular SMC and aimed at reversing their migratory phenotype and attenuating the progressive process of neointimal formation, which complicate the long lasting effects of balloon angioplasty (endarterectomy) of the occluded atherosclerotic coronaries.

The identification of EBP as S-gal may also have a direct impact on the understanding of the connective tissue and cardiovascular disorders observed in some cases of GM1 gangliosidosis and all cases of Morquio disease type B, which represent two primary beta -galactosidase deficiency diseases (33). It seems quite probable that multiple mutations, and especially missense mutations, described in these diseases would alter function and distribution of both beta -gal and S-gal proteins. Further studies (already initiated in our laboratory) will determine the respective roles of each protein in these diseases.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Sunqu Zhang and C. C. Eric Yang for their excellent technical assistance and advice.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by Grants PG 12351 (to C. A. P.) and PG 13920 (to A. H.) from the Medical Research Council of Canada.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

par Career Investigator of the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Div. of Cardiovascular Research, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave., Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada. Tel.: 416-813-5918; Fax: 416-813-7480; E-mail: alek.hinek{at}mailhub.sickkids.on.ca.

1 The abbreviations used are: ECM, extracellular matrix; S-gal, spliced variant of beta -galactosidase; C-gal, C-terminal end of the beta -galactosidase precursor; P-gal, human beta -galactosidase precursor; EBP, elastin/laminin-binding protein; beta -gal, beta -galactosidase; DA, ductus arteriosus; SMC, smooth muscle cells; alpha -MEM, alpha -minimal essential medium; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; IP, immunoprecipitate; DTT, dithiothreitol; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; RLU, relative light unit(s); IL-1, interleukin-1; bp, base pair(s); GM1, Galbeta (1-3)GalNAcbeta (1-4)Gal-[alpha (2-3)NeuAc-]beta (1-4)Glc-beta - 1-ceramide.

2 A. Hinek and J. W. Callahan, unpublished results.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Juliano, R. L., and Haskill, S. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 120, 577-585[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Lin, C. Q., and Bissel, M. (1993) FASEB J. 7, 737-743[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Abelda, M. S. (1993) Lab. Invest. 68, 4-17[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Hinek, A., Wrenn, D. S., Mecham, R. P., Barondes, S. H. (1988) Science 239, 1539-1541[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Mecham, R. P., Hinek, A., Entwistle, R., Wrenn, D. S., Griffin, G. L., Senior, R. M. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 3716-3722[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Hinek, A. (1996) Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler 377, 471-480
  7. Grosso, L. E., and Scott, M. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 13369-13374[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Mecham, R. P., and Heuser, J. E. (1991) Cell Biology of Extracellular Matrix, 2nd Ed., pp. 79-105, Plenum Press, New York
  9. Hinek, A., Mecham, R. P., Keeley, F. W., Rabinovitch, M. (1991) J. Clin. Invest. 88, 2083-2094[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Hinek, A., Boyle, J., and Rabinovitch, M. (1992) Exp. Cell Res. 203, 344-353[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Hinek, A., Rabinovitch, M., Keeley, F. W., Okamura-Oho, Y., Callahan, J. W. (1993) J. Clin. Invest. 91, 1198-1205[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Jacob, M. P., Fulop, T., Foris, G., and Robert, L. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 995-999[Abstract]
  13. Faury, G., Ristori, M. T., Verditti, J., Jacob, M. P., Robert, L. (1995) J. Vasc. Res. 32, 112-119[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Fulop, T., Jacob, M. P., Foris, G., Varga, Z., and Robert, L. (1989) Cell Calcium Metabolism, Plenum Publishing Corp., New York
  15. Robert, L., and Jacotot, B. (1994) J. Jap. Atheroscler. Soc. 21, 613-618
  16. Varga, Z., Jacob, M. P., Robert, L., and Fulop, T. (1989) FEBS Lett. 258, 5-8[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Hinek, A., and Rabinovitch, M. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 126, 563-574[Abstract]
  18. Hinek, A., Keeley, F., and Callahan, J. W. (1995) Exp. Cell Res. 220, 1-13[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Boudreau, N., and Rabinovitch, M. (1991) Lab. Invest. 64, 187-199[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Molossi, S., Clausel, N., and Rabinovitch, M. (1995) J. Cell Physiol. 163, 19-29[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Hinek, A., Molossi, S., and Rabinovitch, M. (1996) Exp. Cell Res. 225, 122-131[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Morreau, H., Galjart, N. J., Gillemans, N., Willemsen, R., van der Horst, G. T. J., d'Azzo, A. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 20655-20663[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Prosser, I. W., Whitehouse, L. A., Parks, W. C., Hinek, A., Park, P. W., Mecham, R. P. (1991) Connect. Tissue Res. 25, 265-279[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Zhang, S., McCarter, J. D., Okamura-Oho, Y., Yaghi, F., Hinek, A., Withers, S. G., Callahan, J. W. (1994) Biochem. J. 304, 281-288[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Okamura-Oho, Y., Zhang, S., Hilson, W., Hinek, A., and Callahan, J. W. (1996) Biochem. J. 313, 787-794[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Mecham, R. P., Hinek, A., Cleary, E. G., Kucich, U., Lee, S. J., Rosenbloom, J. (1988) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 151, 822-826[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Hanahan, D. (1983) J. Mol. Biol. 166, 557-580[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A., and Struhl, K. (eds) (1996) Current Protocols In Molecular Biology, Suppl. 36, pp. 9.2.1-9.2.3, John Wiley & Sons, New York
  29. Elsholtz, H. P., Lew, A. M., Albert, P. R., Sundmark, V. C. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 22919-22925[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed., pp. 16.32-16.36, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  31. Hinek, A. (1994) Cell Adhes. Commun. 2, 185-193[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Yamamoto, Y., Hake, C. A., Martin, B. M., Kretz, K. A., Ahern-Rindell, A. J., Naylor, N. L., Mudd, M., O'Brien, J. S. (1990) DNA Cell Biol. 9, 119-127[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Suzuki, Y., Sakuraba, H., and Oshima, A. (1995) Metabolic Basis of Inherited Disease, Vol. 2, McGraw-Hill, New York


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.