Structural Determinants of Ligand and Cell Surface Binding of Insulin-like Growth Factor-binding Protein-3*

Sue M. FirthDagger , Usha Ganeshprasad, and Robert C. Baxter

From the Kolling Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, New South Wales 2065, Australia

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Among the well defined insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding proteins (IGFBPs), IGFBP-3 is characterized by its interaction with an acid-labile glycoprotein (ALS) in the presence of IGFs. To identify the structural determinants on IGFBP-3 required for ligand binding and cell association, five recombinant human IGFBP-3 variants were expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells: deletions of amino acids 89-264, 89-184, and 185-264, and site-specific mutations 228KGRKR right-arrow MDGEA and 253KED right-arrow RGD. The basic carboxyl-terminal region of IGFBP-3 was required for binding to heparin. The deletion variants had greatly decreased IGF binding ability as assessed by ligand blotting and solution binding assays; affinity cross-linking indicated at least a 20-fold decrease in IGF affinity. The RGD mutant had a 4-6-fold reduced affinity for both IGFs, but the MDGEA mutant bound IGF-I with near normal affinity and IGF-II with a 3-fold reduction in affinity. The three deletion variants were incapable of binding ALS; but of the site-specific variants, the MDGEA mutant bound ALS with 90% lower affinity (Ka = 2.5 ± 0.9 liters/nmol) than seen for rhIGFBP-3 (Ka = 24.3 ± 5.2 liters/nmol), whereas the RGD mutation had no effect on ALS affinity (Ka = 21.7 ± 4.5 liters/nmol). The ability of IGFBP-3 to associate with the cell surface was lost in variants lacking residues 185-264 and in the 228KGRKR right-arrow MDGEA mutant. We conclude that residues 228-232 of IGFBP-3 are essential for cell association and are required for normal ALS binding affinity.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins (IGFBPs)1 are a family of at least six related proteins involved in regulating the bioavailability of insulin-like growth factors, IGF-I and IGF-II. The IGFBP structure may be divided into cysteine-rich amino- and carboxyl-terminal domains, which show considerable structural conservation among IGFBP-1 to -6, and a central domain that is unique for each IGFBP. IGFBP-3, a glycoprotein of 40-45 kDa, is characterized by its ability to bind to another glycoprotein, the 85-kDa acid-labile subunit (ALS), in the presence of either IGF-I or IGF-II to form a ternary complex of 150 kDa (1). Because the majority of serum IGFs are bound in this form (2, 3), the ternary complex acts essentially as a circulating reservoir of IGFs and regulates the delivery of the IGFs to target tissues.

IGFBP-3 has been implicated at the cellular level as a modulator of IGF-I action (4, 5). Soluble IGFBP-3 can inhibit IGF-I activity by sequestering the peptide and consequently preventing interaction with its receptor. In contrast, potentiation of IGF-I action has been attributed to cell surface-associated IGFBP-3 (5). Several studies have also suggested that IGFBP-3 may modulate cell growth independently of IGFs (6-8). This IGF-independent growth-inhibitory effect was recently shown to be mediated by the direct induction of apoptosis by IGFBP-3 (9).

This multifaceted role of IGFBP-3 has led to extensive studies on its regulation, expression, distribution, and function in cultured cells and in animal models (3, 10-12). To date however, there have been few studies aimed at elucidating the structural determinants involved in the protein-protein and protein-cell interactions required for IGFBP-3 function. In this study we describe the generation and expression of cDNAs encoding the natural form, three deletion mutants, and two site-specific mutants of human IGFBP-3. The resulting recombinant proteins have allowed the delineation of domains involved in IGF-I and ALS binding and in cell surface association.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Reagents-- All radiolabeled proteins used were prepared as described previously (13, 14). Restriction enzymes were from Promega Corp. (Madison, WI). T7 DNA polymerase was from Pharmacia Biotech Inc. (Uppsala, Sweden). Pfu DNA polymerase was from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA). Hexadimethrine bromide (Polybrene), dexamethasone, hypoxanthine, xanthine, thymidine, and mycophenolic acid were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO) and aminopterin from Life Technologies Inc. (Gaithersburg, MD). Nucleoside-free alpha -modified Eagle's medium (alpha -MEM) and fetal calf serum were from Cytosystems (North Ryde, NSW, Australia).

cDNA Constructs-- A 1,080-base pair EcoRI-PvuII fragment, excised from ibp.118 (15), containing the full coding sequence of hIGFBP-3 (provided by Dr. W. I. Wood, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA) was inserted into pSELECT (Promega). Using this recombinant plasmid as cDNA template and pairs of oligonucleotides (see below), fragments containing full or partial hIGFBP-3 coding sequences were amplified by Pfu DNA polymerase in polymerase chain reactions and cloned into the expression vector pMSG (Pharmacia). This generated expression plasmids rhIGFBP-3, rhIGFBP-3[Delta 89-264], rhIGFBP-3[Delta 185-264], and rhIGFBP-3[Delta 89-184] (Fig. 1A). Site-directed mutagenesis (16), employing oligonucleotides and the pSELECT-hIGFBP-3 plasmid as the mutagenesis vector, was carried out to introduce specific mutations in vitro. cDNA fragments amplified from these mutated plasmids were cloned into pMSG to generate expression plasmids rhIGFBP-3[253KED right-arrow RGD] and rhIGFBP-3[228KGRKR right-arrow MDGEA], each carrying the IGFBP-1 sequence analogous to the mutated region (Fig. 1A). The hIGFBP-3 coding sequences of each construct were verified by plasmid DNA sequencing (17).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Panel A, expression plasmids of rhIGFBP-3 and its derivatives. The structure of hIGFBP-3 is represented by the box at the top. The stippled box indicates the signal peptide sequence, the vertical lines represent cysteine residues, and the shaded boxes represent putative N-glycosylation sites. The regions of conserved sequences among the six IGFBPs are indicated above the cDNA; the numbers below are amino acid residue numbers. The black bars below show the extent of hIGFBP-3 cDNA sequences carried by each expression plasmid, and the numbered arrowed lines indicate the oligonucleotides used in amplifying these regions. The numbered broken lines represent oligonucleotides used to generate specific mutations in IGFBP-3. The sequences of the oligonucleotides and the construction of the plasmids are outlined under "Materials and Methods." Panel B, induction of rhIGFBP-3 expression in transfected cells by dexamethasone. Monolayer cultures of each transfected cell line were incubated in the medium in the absence (filled bars) or presence (open bars) of 10 µM dexamethasone, as described under "Materials and Methods." Media were collected after 72 h and assayed for IGFBP-3. Values shown are the mean ± S.E. for quadruplicate wells.

Oligonucleotides were synthesized on an Oligo 1000 DNA Synthesizer (Beckman Instruments, Palo Alto, CA). Oligonucleotides I (5'-GTACGCTAGCTGTACTGTCGCCCCATCC) and II (5'-CGGGTCGACAGGCGTCTACTTGCTCTGC) introduce an NheI and SalI restriction site (indicated in italics), respectively, to aid cloning of the amplified product into pMSG. Oligonucleotides III (5'-GTAGTCGACTAGACGCAGAGCCCG) and IV (5'-CTTGTCGACTCAGGGACCATATTCTGTCTC) introduce a stop codon (indicated in bold) after amino acid residues 88 and 184, respectively, as well as a downstream SalI restriction site (indicated in italics). Oligonucleotides V (5'-GTATTAGGATCCTTGACGCAGAGCCCG) and VI (5'-GACTGAGGATCCCTGCCGTAGAGAAATGG) contain BamHI sites (indicated in italics) which enabled an in-frame ligation of the amplification products using oligonucleotides I and V and oligonucleotides VI and II. Oligonucleotides VII (5'-CTACACCACCAAGGGGcgcGgcGACGTGCACTGCTAC) and VIII (5'-TTTTATAAGAAAAAGCAGTGTCGCCCTTCCAtgGaCgGGgAGgcGGGCTTCTGCTGGTGTGTGGATAAGTATGGG) were used for replacing 253KE (AAG GAG) with RG (cgc Ggc) and 228KGRKR (AAA GGC AGG AAG CGG) with MDGEA (Atg GaC gGG gAG gcG), respectively. Nucleotides that differ from the IGFBP-3 sequence are indicated in lowercase letters.

Cell Culture and Transfection-- CHO cells were grown in alpha -MEM supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum at 37 °C. For transfection, the cells were plated out at 6 × 105 cells/75-cm2 flask, incubated for 24 h, and then transfected with 20 µg of DNA of each rhIGFBP-3 expression plasmid or pMSG in the presence of 100 µg of Polybrene (18). The plasmids contain the guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (gpt) gene, which confers resistance to mycophenolic acid. The transfected cells were cultured in GPT selection medium for 21 days to select for stable transfectants. The medium for GPT selection consists of alpha -MEM supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum, 250 µg/ml xanthine, 25 µg/ml mycophenolic acid, 2 µg/ml aminopterin, 10 µg/ml thymidine, and 15 µg/ml hypoxanthine. Expression of the recombinant proteins is driven by the mouse mammary tumor virus long terminal repeat promoter on pMSG which has a glucocorticoid-responsive element, hence expression is inducible by dexamethasone. Following the selection period, the mixed population of each transfected cell line was grown to confluence and the media changed to serum-free alpha -MEM supplemented with 0.1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 10 µM dexamethasone. After 72 h, the conditioned media were collected and stored at -15 °C before assaying for rhIGFBP-3 by a radioimmunoassay (RIA) specific for hIGFBP-3 (13).

Purification of IGFBP-3 Variants-- Serum-free media conditioned for 48-72 h by each of the transfected CHO populations were collected and clarified by centrifugation at 15,300 × g for 20 min. A mixture of protease inhibitors (500 units/ml aprotinin, 5 µg/ml alpha 2-macroglobulin, 0.5 µg/ml leupeptin, 0.5 mg/ml Na2EDTA) was added to the medium.

Conditioned media were applied to 1-ml heparin-Sepharose columns (HiTrap heparin, Pharmacia) at 0.4 ml/min at 4 °C. After extensive washes with 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 6.5), rhIGFBP-3 was eluted by applying a step gradient of 0.3-1.0 M sodium chloride (made in 10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6.5). Five fractions of 2 ml each were collected at each step of the elution gradient and assayed for rhIGFBP-3 by RIA.

One ml of polyclonal antiserum (R-100) raised against hIGFBP-3 was purified on a protein A-Sepharose CL-4B column, essentially as recommended by the manufacturer (Pharmacia). The IgG fraction that was eluted with 0.5 M acetic acid was adjusted to pH 7 immediately and then coupled covalently to Affi-Gel 10-activated support (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). This antibody affinity matrix was then packed into 0.5- × 2.5-cm columns and washed extensively with 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 6.5). Conditioned medium was then pumped onto the column at 0.4 ml/min at 4 °C, followed by washes as before. rhIGFBP-3 was eluted with 0.5 M acetic acid (pH 3.0) at 0.3 ml/min. Thirty fractions of 1 ml each were collected and assayed for rhIGFBP-3 by RIA.

Recombinant proteins purified by either heparin- or antibody-affinity chromatography were purified further by reverse phase high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) as described previously (19).

Immuno- and Ligand Blotting-- Conditioned media were concentrated by centrifugation through either Centricon-3 or Centricon-10 microconcentrators (Amicon Inc., Beverley, MA) and the IGFBP-3 concentration in each sample determined by RIA. Each protein (approximately 50 ng) was reconstituted in 50 µl of Laemmli sample buffer, heated at 95 °C for 5 min, and fractionated under nonreducing conditions on a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel overnight at 100 V (20). The proteins were then transferred to Hybond-C Extra supported nitrocellulose (Amersham, Bucks, UK) by electroblotting using a Multiphor II Novablot unit (Pharmacia). After transfer, the blot was incubated at 37 °C for 3 h in Tris-buffered saline (TBS, 10 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) containing 1% (w/v) BSA and then probed with anti-hIGFBP-3 antiserum at a final concentration of 1:10,000 (prepared in TBS containing 1% (w/v) BSA and 0.05% (v/v) Nonidet P-40). The blot was washed three times in TBS, once in TBS containing 0.05% Nonidet P-40, and a further three times in TBS and then incubated for 2 h at 22 °C in 125I-protein A (1 × 106 cpm/50 ml of TBS containing 1% (w/v) BSA and 0.05% (v/v) Nonidet P-40). Following the wash regime used above, the dried blot was placed against Hyperfilm MP autoradiographic film (Amersham) for 1-3 days at -70 °C.

The samples for ligand blotting were prepared either as described above or by immunoprecipitation with hIGFBP-3-specific antibody bound to protein A-Sepharose CL-4B (Pharmacia) before electrophoresis. Briefly, approximately 50 ng of each protein was incubated with the antibody-protein A-Sepharose mixture for 2 h at room temperature. After extensive washes with 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5), each sample was resuspended in 50 µl of Laemmli sample buffer, heated at 95 °C for 5 min, and then electrophoresed on a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and electroblotted onto nitrocellulose as described above. The blot was incubated with 125I-IGF-I (1 × 106 cpm/50 ml) for 16 h at 22 °C. The blot was then washed and processed for autoradiography as described above. Alternatively, the blot was placed against a Storage Phosphor Screen for 16 h and the image scanned and analyzed on a PhosphorImager SP (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).

Affinity Labeling-- 10 ng of each rhIGFBP-3 variant was incubated with 125I-IGF-I or 125I-IGF-II (0.4 × 106 cpm) in the presence of unlabeled IGF-I or IGF-II, respectively, at concentrations over the range of 10-11 to 10-6 M. The reactions were made up to a final volume of 45 µl with 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 6.5) containing 0.05% (w/v) BSA. The complexes were cross-linked with 0.25 mM disuccinimidyl suberate (Pierce, Rockford, IL), and after 30 min incubation at 4 °C, the reactions were terminated by the addition of 2 µl of 1.0 M Tris base. Reactions were heated to 95 °C before electrophoresis on either 10% or 12% SDS-PAGE. The gels were processed for autoradiography, and radiolabeled protein bands were quantified by densitometry (Video Densitometer model 620, Bio-Rad).

Binding Assays-- Binary and ternary complex formation in the presence of rhIGFBP-3 or variants was measured essentially as described previously (21). Briefly, reactions containing 125I-IGF-I or 125I-IGF-II (10,000 cpm) and rhIGFBP-3 analogs over the concentration range of 0-5 ng in a total volume of 0.3 ml of 50 mM sodium phosphate containing 1% (w/v) BSA, were incubated at 22 °C for 2 h. The binary complexes were immunoprecipitated with 0.5 µl of IGFBP-3 antibody and 2.5 µl of goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin in the presence of a 4% final concentration of polyethylene glycol. Ternary complex formation was measured by incubating 125I-ALS (10,000 cpm) with mixtures of IGF-I (50 ng) and varying concentrations of rhIGFBP-3 or variants (over the range of 0-20 ng) in a total volume of 0.3 ml of 50 mM sodium phosphate containing 1% (w/v) BSA at 22 °C for 2 h. Ternary complexes were then separated from unbound tracer as described above.

The affinity of IGF binding to rhIGFBP-3 analogs was measured essentially as described above except that the concentration of rhIGFBP-3 analogs was held constant at 0.5 ng. Unlabeled IGF was added over the concentration range of 0.0025-1 ng in a total volume of 0.3 ml. Complexes were separated from unbound tracer by immunoprecipitation as described above. The affinity of ALS binding to the rhIGFBP-3·IGF-I binary complex was determined as described previously (14) except that the concentrations of rhIGFBP-3 analogs (0.5 ng) and IGF-I (50 ng) were held constant while unlabeled ALS was added over the concentration range of 2.5-200 ng in a total volume of 0.3 ml. Bound tracer was separated from free tracer, as described above. Scatchard analysis was as described previously (14).

Detection of Cell-associated IGFBP-3-- Cell surface association of rhIGFBP-3 produced endogenously by the transfected cell lines was measured by an immunological assay described previously (22). Briefly, cells were plated at 2 × 104 cells/well in 24-well plates for 48 h. Cultures were changed to serum-free media supplemented with 0.1% (w/v) BSA and incubated for a further 48 h. The cell monolayers were then washed and incubated with either hIGFBP-3 antibody (R-100) or normal rabbit serum (as control for nonspecific effects) diluted 1:5,000 in 0.5 ml of medium. After a 16-h incubation at 22 °C, the cell monolayers were washed again before incubation with 125I-labeled protein A (20,000 cpm in 0.5 ml of medium) for 2 h. Unbound tracer was removed by washing, and the cells were solubilized with 0.5% (w/v) SDS. The cell lysates were collected, and radioactivity was determined in a gamma -counter.

Statistical Analysis-- Statistical analysis was carried out using StatView 4.02 (Abacus Concepts Inc., Berkeley, CA). Differences between groups were evaluated by Fisher's Protected Least Significant Difference test after analysis of variance, and a significant difference was defined as p < 0.05.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

rhIGFBP-3 proteins, detectable by RIA, were secreted by each of the transfected cell lines, and the expression of these proteins was inducible up to 7-fold by dexamethasone (Fig. 1B). The differences in levels of stimulation by dexamethasone are probably due to the heterogeneous population of transfectants in each cell line. There was no detectable hIGFBP-3 in media conditioned by CHO cells transfected with pMSG as a control. The polyclonal IGFBP-3 antibody recognized all variant proteins including the deletion variants, indicating that an antigenic epitope is present in the amino-terminal portion of the protein, the only region common to all variants. In the RIA, the full-length analogs and rhIGFBP-3 yielded displacement curves that were parallel to pure serum-derived IGFBP-3. In contrast, the deletion variants displayed parallelism up to 1-2 ng, but the displacement curves became nonparallel at higher concentrations (data not shown). All samples were assayed under conditions where parallelism was observed. Under these conditions, the RIA was considered the best method available for quantifying low amounts of these proteins.

Immunoblots of the five variants are shown in Fig. 2A. rhIGFBP-3, rhIGFBP-3[253KED right-arrow RGD], and rhIGFBP-3[228KGRKR right-arrow MDGEA] produced a 40-45-kDa doublet as well as a 30-kDa form, essentially identical to serum-derived hIGFBP-3. rhIGFBP-3[Delta 185-264] migrated as a doublet of 30-35 kDa. Adding an estimated mass of 10-15 kDa of carbohydrate to the calculated 19-kDa core protein, the observed bands of rhIGFBP-3[Delta 185-264] corresponded well with the predicted size of 29-34 kDa. The doublet evident in rhIGFBP-3[Delta 185-264] probably represents different glycoforms of the protein consistent with the current view that the 40-45-kDa doublet of IGFBP-3 consists of glycoforms (23); IGFBP-3 contains three potential N-glycosylation sites at 89NAS, 109NAS, and 172NFS (15). rhIGFBP-3[Delta 89-264] corresponded to an apparent size of approximately 15 kDa, whereas rhIGFBP-3[Delta 89-184] migrated as a major band at 21 kDa and a minor band at 17 kDa. Because the deduced molecular masses for the Delta 89-264 and Delta 89-184 variants are 9 and 18 kDa, respectively, it would appear that the proteins are migrating aberrantly on SDS-PAGE. Presumably, the smaller 17-kDa form of rhIGFBP-3[Delta 89-184] represents a proteolyzed form of the protein, comparable to the 30-kDa form of rhIGFBP-3, rhIGFBP-3[253KED right-arrow RGD], and rhIGFBP-3[228KGRKR right-arrow MDGEA].


View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Immuno- and ligand blotting of various hIGFBP-3. Samples were prepared and processed for immunoblotting (panel A) or ligand blotting (panels B and C) as described under "Materials and Methods." Relative migration distances of molecular mass standards are indicated on the left of each panel. Panel A, samples are natural, serum-derived hIGFBP-3 (lane 1), media conditioned by CHO cells transfected with pMSG (lane 2), rhIGFBP-3 (lane 3), rhIGFBP-3[Delta 89-264] (lane 4), rhIGFBP-3[Delta 185-264] (lane 5), rhIGFBP-3[Delta 89-184] (lane 6), rhIGFBP-3[253KED right-arrow RGD] (lane 7), and rhIGFBP-3[228KGRKR right-arrow MDGEA] (lane 8). The probe used was specific hIGFBP-3 antibody. Panel B, samples are serum-derived hIGFBP-3 (lanes 1 and 4) and media conditioned by CHO cells transfected with pMSG (lanes 2 and 5) or rhIGFBP-3 (lanes 3 and 6). Samples in lanes 4-6 were immunoprecipitated with hIGFBP-3 antiserum before electrophoresis. Panel C, samples are identical to those in panel A except that they were immunoprecipitated with hIGFBP-3 antiserum as described under "Materials and Methods." The ligand used in panels B and C was 125I-IGF-I.

The ability of the rhIGFBP-3 proteins to bind IGF-I was examined by ligand blot using 125I-IGF-I. A preliminary experiment revealed that there were two forms of IGF-I-binding protein present in the media conditioned by cells transfected with the vector, pMSG (Fig. 2B). Based on the apparent sizes of these proteins (approximately 23 and 28 kDa), we assume that they are glycoforms of CHO-derived IGFBP-4. Immunoprecipitation of the sample with hIGFBP-3 antibody before electrophoresis removed these proteins (Fig. 2B). Ligand blotting of immunoprecipitated IGFBP-3 variant proteins (Fig. 2C) indicated that rhIGFBP-3[253KED right-arrow RGD] and rhIGFBP-3[228KGRKR right-arrow MDGEA] have an IGF-I binding function. In contrast, none of the deletion variants showed detectable IGF binding by this method.

To examine their binding properties in more detail, the full-length rhIGFBP-3 analogs were purified from conditioned media by heparin-Sepharose chromatography followed by reverse phase HPLC. The wild-type protein was eluted from the heparin column as a single peak by 0.75 M NaCl (Fig. 3A). rhIGFBP-3[253KED right-arrow RGD] showed a similar elution profile (Fig. 3B). In contrast, rhIGFBP-3[228KGRKR right-arrow MDGEA] eluted at a concentration of only 0.5 M (Fig. 3C), and rhIGFBP-3[Delta 89-184] eluted as two peaks at 0.5 and 0.75 M NaCl (Fig. 3D). Among the deletion analogs, the Delta 89-184 variant showed a marked reduction in binding activity, but the other two analogs did not bind to heparin-Sepharose at all (data not shown). Endogenous IGFBP-4 from CHO cells also bound to heparin-Sepharose and eluted at 0.5 M NaCl (data not shown), consistent with previous studies (24). The CHO-derived IGFBP-4 was separated from rhIGFBP-3[228KGRKR right-arrow MDGEA] on reverse phase HPLC.


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Elution profiles of rhIGFBP-3 from heparin-Sepharose chromatography. Media containing rhIGFBP-3 (panel A, black-square), rhIGFBP-3[253KED right-arrow RGD] (panel B, square ), rhIGFBP-3[228KGRKR right-arrow MDGEA] (panel C, open circle ), and rhIGFBP-3[Delta 89-184] (panel D, triangle ) were applied to 1-ml columns equilibrated in 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 6.5) buffer. The column was washed with 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 6.5) buffer, and adherent proteins were eluted in a stepwise fashion with the same buffer (10 ml) containing increasing concentrations of sodium chloride (bullet ). The 2-ml fractions were assayed for rhIGFBP-3 in the RIA.

Because of the poor binding of the rhIGFBP-3 deletion analogs to heparin-Sepharose, these analogs were purified from an antibody affinity column followed by reverse phase HPLC, as described under "Materials and Methods." The proteins purified by either heparin or antibody affinity were analyzed by SDS-PAGE to check for protein integrity and purity. Dose-response curves for the binding of various IGFBP-3 analogs to either 125I-IGF-I (Fig. 4A) or 125I-IGF-II (Fig. 4B) were obtained from solution binding assays. In both instances, there was little or no detectable binding of the deletion analogs to either IGF ligand, consistent with the results obtained from ligand blotting (Fig. 2C). Competitive binding curves were generated for IGFBP-3 forms that showed IGF binding, to compare their relative affinities for IGF-I (Fig. 4C) and IGF-II (Fig. 4D). Data from these assays were analyzed by Scatchard plot, and the derived binding affinities are summarized in Table I. Consistent with the previously determined affinities for IGF-I and IGF-II binding by serum-derived IGFBP-3 (19, 25), rhIGFBP-3 displayed a higher affinity for IGF-II than for IGF-I. However, the difference in Ka values was not statistically significant (p = 0.06). This may result from different post-translational modifications on the IGFBP-3 from different sources. The RGD mutant had significant decreases in its affinities for both IGF-I and IGF-II (4- and 6-fold, respectively; Table I). The MDGEA mutant showed significant reduction in IGF-II affinity (3-fold), but its affinity to IGF-I was near normal (Table I).


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Formation of the binary complex in the presence of various rhIGFBP-3 analogs. The analogs shown are rhIGFBP-3 (black-square), rhIGFBP-3[Delta 89-264] (down-triangle), rhIGFBP-3[Delta 185-264] (diamond ), rhIGFBP-3[Delta 89-184] (triangle ), rhIGFBP-3[253KED right-arrow RGD] (square ), and rhIGFBP-3[228KGRKR right-arrow MDGEA] (open circle ). Binding of 125I-IGF-I (panel A) or 125I-IGF-II (panel B) to increasing amounts of rhIGFBP-3 is shown. The binding curves are representatives of at least two independent measurements for each analog. Competition for the binding of 125I-IGF-I (panel C) or 125I-IGF-II (panel D) to 0.5 ng of each rhIGFBP-3 by increasing concentrations of unlabeled IGF-I or IGF-II, respectively, is shown. B/B0 represents the ratio of 125I-IGF bound to rhIGFBP-3 in the presence of unlabeled IGF to that bound in the absence of unlabeled IGF. Data points shown are mean ± S.E. of at least three independent measurements.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Binding parameters for the formation of binary and ternary complexes between IGF-I, IGF-II, ALS, and various analogs of IGFBP-3
Binary complex formation was determined by the binding of either 125I-IGF-I or 125I-IGF-II to 0.5 ng of each rhIGFBP-3 analog. Ternary complex formation was determined by the binding of 125I-ALS to 0.5 ng of each rhIGFBP-3 analog in the presence of 50 ng of IGF-I. The molecular weights of IGFBP-3 and ALS were taken as 43,000 and 85,000, respectively. Values are means ± S.E. for three measurements.

To investigate the possibility that the deletion analogs may have low affinities for IGF which were undetectable by solution binding, 125I-IGF-I or 125I-IGF-II was covalently cross-linked to the analogs in the presence of competing unlabeled IGF-I or IGF-II, respectively. The samples were analyzed on SDS-PAGE, and the resulting band intensities were quantified by scanning densitometry, to generate displacement curves. Typical electrophoretograms for rhIGFBP-3 are shown (Fig. 5, panels A and F). By this technique, half-maximal displacement of bound IGF-I or IGF-II tracer from rhIGFBP-3 (Fig. 5, B and G, respectively) was seen at unlabeled ligand concentrations similar to those in the solution binding assays (Fig. 4, C and D), confirming the validity of the affinity labeling technique.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Affinity cross-linking of [125I]IGF-I (top panels) or [125I]IGF-II (bottom panels) to rhIGFBP-3 analogs in the presence of increasing concentrations of unlabeled IGF-I or IGF-II, respectively. After affinity labeling as described under "Materials and Methods," the samples were processed by SDS-PAGE. Representative autoradiographs of rhIGFBP-3 cross-linked to 125I-IGF-I (panel A) and 125I-IGF-II (panel F) are shown. Relative migration distances of molecular mass standards are indicated on the left. The intensities of the bands were quantified by scanning densitometry, and the resulting displacement curves are shown for rhIGFBP-3 (panels B and G, black-square), rhIGFBP-3[Delta 185-264] (panels C and H, diamond ), rhIGFBP-3[Delta 89-184] (panels D and I, triangle ), and rhIGFBP-3[Delta 89-264] (panels E and J, down-triangle). B/B0 represents the ratio of 125I-IGF bound to rhIGFBP-3 in the presence of unlabeled IGF to that bound in the absence of unlabeled IGF. Data shown are mean ± S.E. of three independent measurements.

As shown in Fig. 5, all three deletion analogs were cross-linked to either 125I-IGF-I or 125I-IGF-II, and the tracers were displaceable by unlabeled IGF-I or IGF-II. However, the affinities were 20-60-fold lower than that of rhIGFBP-3. The concentrations of IGF-I required to displace 50% of tracer binding to the various analogs were 0.12 ± 0.02 nM (rhIGFBP-3), 2.02 ± 0.96 nM (Delta 185-264), 4.42 ± 1.19 nM (Delta 89-184), and 7.00 ± 1.22 nM (Delta 89-264). The relative concentrations of IGF-II required to displace 50% of tracer binding to the various analogs were 0.06 ± 0.03 nM (rhIGFBP-3), 2.43 ± 0.61 nM (Delta 185-264), 2.14 ± 0.59 nM (Delta 89-184), and 2.50 ± 0.94 nM (Delta 89-264).

Fig. 6A shows the dose-response curves of the various IGFBP-3 analogs for binding to ALS in the presence of excess (50 ng) IGF-I, i.e. for ternary complex formation. As predicted by the lack of binding in IGF-I solution binding assays above (Fig. 4A), the deletion variants also displayed barely detectable levels of ALS binding. Similar results were obtained when the binding assays were performed in the presence of IGF-II (data not shown). On the other hand, rhIGFBP-3[253KED right-arrow RGD] exhibited a dose-response curve parallel to that of rhIGFBP-3, but the curve had shifted to the right, indicating that the ALS binding activity of this variant was decreased compared with rhIGFBP-3. This may reflect its decreased affinity for IGF-I (Table I). Although rhIGFBP-3[228KGRKR right-arrow MDGEA] demonstrated a smaller, nonsignificant decrease in affinity for IGF-I compared with rhIGFBP-3[253KED right-arrow RGD] (Table I), its binding to ALS was decreased markedly (Fig. 6A), suggesting that the mutation in this analog predominantly affects its ALS binding function.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Formation of the ternary complex in the presence of various rhIGFBP-3 analogs. Panel A, binding of 125I-ALS to 50 ng of IGF-I in the presence of increasing rhIGFBP-3 concentrations. The IGFBP-3 analogs shown are rhIGFBP-3 (black-square), rhIGFBP-3[Delta 89-264] (down-triangle), rhIGFBP-3[Delta 185-264] (diamond ), rhIGFBP-3[Delta 89-184] (triangle ), rhIGFBP-3[253KED right-arrow RGD] (square ), and rhIGFBP-3[228KGRKR right-arrow MDGEA] (open circle ). The binding curves shown are representatives of at least two independent measurements for each analog. Panel B, Scatchard plots of ALS binding to 50 ng of IGF-I in the presence of 0.5 ng of rhIGFBP-3 (black-square), rhIGFBP-3[253KED right-arrow RGD] (square ), or rhIGFBP-3[228KGRKR right-arrow MDGEA] (open circle ). The plots shown are representatives of three independent measurements for each analog.

To compare the relative affinities of ALS for the IGFBP-3 variants, we determined the displacement of 125I-ALS from the ternary complexes, formed in the presence of 50 ng of IGF-I and the IGF-binding IGFBP-3 variants, by increasing concentrations of unlabeled ALS (data not shown). Representative Scatchard plots derived from these competition curves are shown in Fig. 6B and the binding parameters summarized in Table I. Whereas rhIGFBP-3[253KED right-arrow RGD] had an affinity for ALS (21.7 ± 4.5 × 109 liters/mol) similar to rhIGFBP-3 (24.3 ± 5.2 × 109 liters/mol), rhIGFBP-3[228KGRKR right-arrow MDGEA] showed a 90% reduction in ALS affinity (2.5 ± 0.9 × 109 l/mol, p < 0.05), indicating the importance of these basic residues in ALS binding.

It has been shown previously that IGFBP-3 synthesized by fibroblasts can associate with the cell surface and can be displaced by the addition of IGF-I (22). The interaction between the various endogenously produced rhIGFBP-3 forms and the cell surface was examined (Fig. 7). Cell surface-associated rhIGFBP-3 proteins were only detected in cell lines transfected with rhIGFBP-3, rhIGFBP-3[Delta 89-184], and rhIGFBP-3[253KED right-arrow RGD]. The absence of cell-associated forms of recombinant proteins in cells expressing the Delta 89-264 and Delta 185-264 variants indicates that the carboxyl-terminal region of the protein is necessary for cell surface association. Furthermore, the basic residues (228KGRKR) in the carboxyl-terminal region, shown above to be important determinants of affinity for ALS, are also integral to the cell association domain, as mutation of these residues abolished the ability of rhIGFBP-3[228KGRKR right-arrow MDGEA] to interact with the cell surface. Consistent with previous evidence indicating that IGF-I displaces cell surface-associated IGFBP-3 into the extracellular medium (22), rhIGFBP-3- and rhIGFBP-3[253KED right-arrow RGD]-transfected cells showed a decrease (approximately 40 and 60%, respectively) in cell-associated binding proteins when incubated with IGF-I (Fig. 7). On the other hand, there was no difference in the levels of cell-associated protein when cells transfected with rhIGFBP-3[Delta 89-184] were incubated in the presence or absence of IGF-I. This is in accord with previous observations that displacement of cell surface-associated IGFBP-3 by IGF-I requires a direct interaction between the two proteins because rhIGFBP-3[Delta 89-184] has a greatly reduced affinity for IGF-I.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Association of rhIGFBP-3 to the cell surfaces of transfected cells. Cultures of transfected cells were untreated (open bars) or treated (filled bars) with 50 ng/ml of IGF-I for 48 h. Cell surface-associated IGFBP-3 was detected by the binding of hIGFBP-3 antibody followed by 125I-protein A. The cells were solubilized, and the radioactivity in the cell lysates was determined. Data are expressed as a percentage of control (untreated) values. Results shown are the mean ± S.E. of three separate wells in a single experiment; similar results were obtained from two repeat experiments.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Comparison of the primary sequences of the six well characterized IGFBPs indicates that the strongest homology is in the amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions of the proteins, whereas the central regions are unique to each protein. The amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions contain 18 cysteine residues, at identical positions in the IGFBPs (IGFBP-6 lacks two of the residues), which probably confer similar constraints on the structure-function of these proteins (26). The IGF binding domain could therefore involve either or both of these regions. In this study we examined the role of the carboxyl-terminal conserved region in the binding of IGF-I, IGF-II, and ALS by generating three deletion variants of IGFBP-3.

The deletion of either the conserved carboxyl-terminal region (rhIGFBP-3[Delta 185-264]) or the nonconserved central region (rhIGFBP-3[Delta 89-184]) or the combined deletion of both regions (rhIGFBP-3[Delta 89-264]) abolished IGF-I and IGF-II binding when analyzed by either ligand blotting or solution binding. However, all three deletion analogs showed some affinity for both IGF ligands in affinity labeling experiments, in agreement with a previous preliminary report, unsupported by data, that rhIGFBP-3[Delta 89-264] and rhIGFBP-3[Delta 162-264] are capable of binding to IGF-I when analyzed by a similar method (27). It was also reported that deletion of amino acid residues 92-184 or 92-223 did not abolish IGF-I binding. When competitive binding curves for IGF-I or IGF-II binding to rhIGFBP-3 were compared for the solution binding and affinity labeling methods, similar affinity estimates (as determined by half-maximal displacement of radioligand) were obtained, providing some validation of the affinity labeling technique. However, the failure of binding assays to detect IGF binding to the deletion mutants unless stabilized by affinity cross-linking suggests that these relatively low affinity interactions must have quite rapid off-rates.

Deletion of the central region from IGFBP-3 (Delta 89-184) appears to have decreased both IGF-I and IGF-II binding by approximately 40-fold. Whether this nonconserved region is directly involved in the binding interactions or simply helps to maintain the spatial configuration of the amino- and carboxyl-terminal domains is unknown. Deletion of the carboxyl-terminal region (Delta 185-264) alone affected IGF-II binding (~40-fold reduction) more than IGF-I binding (~20-fold reduction). This region is likely to make a specific contribution to the IGF binding site (particularly IGF-II) because carboxyl-terminal fragments of IGFBP-2 have been shown to retain considerable affinity for IGF-II but little for IGF-I (28). The amino-terminal domain must contribute similarly to the IGF binding site because the Delta 89-264 variant retained some binding activity.

The specific mutations in rhIGFBP-3[253KED right-arrow RGD] and rhIGFBP-3[228KGRKR right-arrow MDGEA] did not abolish either IGF-I or IGF-II binding as determined by solution binding assays. The relative binding affinities of rhIGFBP-3[253KED right-arrow RGD] for IGF-I and IGF-II were decreased by approximately 4- and 6-fold, respectively. In both of the site-specific IGFBP-3 variants, the altered amino acids were replaced by analogous sequences from IGFBP-1. Interestingly, it has been reported that when the RGD sequence in IGFBP-1 was replaced by KED (the corresponding IGFBP-3 sequence), the IGFBP-1 variant lost its IGF-I binding activity which was attributed to the formation of dimers by the IGFBP-1 variant. When the RGD sequence in IGFBP-1 was replaced by KGD, however, the mutation did not abolish IGF-I binding (29). The mutation in rhIGFBP-3[228KGRKR right-arrow MDGEA] decreased its affinity for IGF-I and IGF-II by 2- and 3-fold, respectively (Table I). Taken together, these results would suggest that these mutated sequences, compared with the deletion analogs, make a relatively minor contribution to the IGF-I and IGF-II binding sites. The carboxyl-terminal region, where these specific mutations reside, appears to be more important for IGF-II binding than IGF-I binding, which is consistent with the relative IGF-I and IGF-II binding abilities of the deletion analogs.

In support of the participation of carboxyl-terminal residues in IGFBP binding activity, it has been reported that deletions of the carboxyl-terminal region of IGFBP-1 abolished IGF-I binding (29). Others have reported that natural proteolytic truncation of either the amino or carboxyl terminus of IGFBPs has adverse effects on IGF binding (30-33). Therefore it seems clear that both amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions of the IGFBPs participate in the formation of the ligand binding domain. Although the loss of IGF binding by the deletion variants may in part be the result of conformational changes caused by the large deletions, the structural disruption is apparently not excessive, as the epitopes on these proteins are still recognized by an hIGFBP-3 antibody. This antibody not only shows high specificity for hIGFBP-3 among the six hIGFBPs but also for IGFBP-3 from higher primates compared with other species (12).

The only deletion variant to associate with the cell surface was the central domain deletion rhIGFBP-3[Delta 89-184], indicating that the carboxyl-terminal region, but not the central region, is essential for this function of IGFBP-3. Furthermore, the carbohydrate moieties on IGFBP-3 are not required for cell surface association because all of the potential N-linked glycosylation sites have been removed from rhIGFBP-3[Delta 89-184]. This is in agreement with a previous study showing that nonglycosylated rhIGFBP-3 expressed in Escherichia coli can associate with the cell surface of bovine fibroblasts (5). The association of the central region deletion variant with the cell surface suggests that the structural integrity of the carboxyl-terminal domain was retained despite the deletion of one-third of the molecule.

In various studies, IGFBPs-1 to -5 have all been shown to bind to cells (22, 24, 34-36). The RGD sequence within the carboxyl-terminal region of IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 serves as a recognition motif on proteins that adhere to the cell surface via integrin receptors. It has been shown that IGFBP-1 associates with the alpha 5beta 1 integrin and can stimulate the migration of transfected CHO cells (37). The RGD motif is not present in the sequence of native IGFBP-3. The observation that cell-associated IGFBP-3 could be displaced from human fibroblasts by heparin suggested that IGFBP-3 may interact with proteoglycans or other negatively charged molecules on the cell surface (22), possibly via the carboxyl-terminal portion of the protein that is relatively abundant in basic amino acid residues. However, recent evidence suggests that the heparin-inhibitable cell binding of IGFBP-3 may not be to heparan sulfate or chondroitin sulfate glycosaminoglycans (38). This highly basic carboxyl-terminal region is also present in IGFBP-5 and has been shown to be involved in the binding of glycosaminoglycans (39).

There are two putative heparin binding motifs in IGFBP-3, located at amino acids 148-153 and 219-226 in the central and carboxyl-terminal regions, respectively. A recent study (40) showed that synthetic peptides containing either one of these heparin binding consensus sequences bound heparin and that the peptide containing the carboxyl-terminal motif had ~4-fold higher affinity for heparin. The inability of rhIGFBP-3[Delta 185-264] to bind heparin-Sepharose would suggest that the carboxyl-terminal region contributes structurally to the major heparin binding site. This is supported by the finding that rhIGFBP-3[Delta 89-184] bound to heparin-Sepharose, although with less avidity than rhIGFBP-3. Furthermore, heparin binding was affected when amino acid residues adjacent to the carboxyl-terminal putative heparin binding motif were mutated in rhIGFBP-3[228KGRKR right-arrow MDGEA].

Partial replacement of the carboxyl-terminal basic region in hIGFBP-3 with the homologous acidic residues of hIGFBP-1 (rhIGFBP-3[228KGRKR right-arrow MDGEA]) abolished its ability to associate with the cell surface. On the other hand, the presence of the analogous RGD sequence in IGFBP-3 did not appear to affect the ability of the protein to bind to the cell surface. This suggests that the amino acid residues 228KGRKR form a key part of the cell surface association domain of IGFBP-3, lending further support to the study in which synthetic peptides corresponding to the basic region were shown to decrease IGFBP-3 and IGFBP-5 binding to the cell surface (24).

Previous studies from this laboratory have shown by several independent methods, gel permeation chromatography, affinity labeling, and solution binding assays with immunoprecipitation of complexes, that little or no specific binding of human ALS to hIGFBP-3 occurs in the absence of IGF-I or IGF-II. This concept has been challenged recently on the basis of studies with rat ALS and a partially proteolyzed form of rat IGFBP-3 (41) and a study using human nonglycosylated IGFBP-3 (42), both of which were interpreted to show that ALS may bind to IGFBP-3 in the absence of IGFs. Whatever the explanation for these conflicting results, our studies with natural human ALS and IGFBP-3 consistently support the notion that the binary IGF·IGFBP-3 complex, rather than IGFBP-3 itself, forms a high affinity binding site for ALS. Indeed, in the presence of IGF-I variants (for example, with substitutions in the B domain) with low affinity for IGFBP-3, the total binding of ALS is low, because little binary (IGF·IGFBP-3) complex forms, but the affinity of ALS for this complex is not reduced (14). In the presence of IGF-I, the deletion variants that had low affinities for IGF-I (decreased by 20-60-fold) showed very low or no binding to ALS, which is consistent with the requirement of an IGF·IGFBP-3 complex for ALS binding. rhIGFBP-3[253KED right-arrow RGD], which had a 4-fold decrease in IGF-I affinity, displayed normal ALS binding affinity compared with rhIGFBP-3. In contrast, rhIGFBP-3[228KGRKR right-arrow MDGEA] showed markedly impaired ALS binding function, attributable to a loss of affinity for ALS, even though its IGF-I binding is relatively normal. These results specifically implicate IGFBP-3 residues 228-232, but not 253-255, in the interaction with ALS.

The two mutations, therefore, have quite distinct effects on the protein-protein interactions within the ternary complex. The KED right-arrow RGD mutation has altered the capacity of IGFBP-3 to bind to IGF-I without affecting the affinity of ALS. This implies that when the binary complex between rhIGFBP-3[253KED right-arrow RGD] and IGF-I has formed, the mutation has no bearing on the structural integrity of the ALS binding site, because the affinity of ALS remains unchanged. In contrast, the KGRKR right-arrow MDGEA mutation appears to disrupt the ALS binding site, as ALS affinity for this variant was decreased. ALS binding is known to be sensitive to increasing ionic strength (25, 43), and the KGRKR right-arrow MDGEA mutation introduces a significant charge reversal in this region of IGFBP-3, suggesting that interaction between key charged residues may be important. Although binding determinants in the ALS structure have not been elucidated, there is a region of acidic residues in the amino-terminal region of human ALS (23DDDADE) (44) which might interact with the highly basic region in IGFBP-3, and preliminary molecular modeling studies suggest that within the leucine-rich repeating region of ALS, there may be a surface with an accumulation of negative charge.2

In summary, this study has shown that the protein-protein and protein-cell interactions of IGFBP-3 are complex and involve distinct domains of the protein. The structural integrity of the IGF-I binding site is disrupted significantly by deletion of either the central or carboxyl-terminal region of IGFBP-3, but more specific mutations of the carboxyl-terminal region can reduce IGF-I binding. The IGF-I and ALS binding sites are functionally distinct as shown by contrasting the binding characteristics of the 253RGD variant, with decreased IGF-I binding but normal ALS affinity, and the 228MDGEA variant, with near normal IGF binding and greatly reduced ALS affinity. Finally, although gross deletions affected the ability of IGFBP-3 to bind to IGF-I and consequently ALS, the deletion of amino acid residues 89-184 did not alter its interaction with the cell surface. We therefore conclude that the carboxyl-terminal region and in particular, 228KGRKR, is essential for this function. The availability of IGFBP-3 mutants with selective reduction in the affinity for IGFs, on the one hand, and reduced binding to ALS and the cell surface on the other, will provide powerful tools to help elucidate further the dual roles of IGFBP-3 as a transporter of IGFs and a regulator of cell function.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We acknowledge the technical assistance of P. D. Fink in the preliminary experiments of this study and the Leo & Jenny Leukaemia and Cancer Foundation for the purchase of HPLC equipment.

    FOOTNOTES

* This study was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 61-2-9926-8486; Fax: 61-2-9926-8484; E-mail: sfirth{at}med.usyd.edu.au.

1 The abbreviations used are: IGFBP(s), insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein(s); ALS, acid-labile subunit; h, human; rh, recombinant human; alpha -MEM, alpha -modified Eagle's medium; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; BSA, bovine serum albumin; RIA, radioimmunoassay; HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography; TBS, Tris-buffered saline; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

2 J. Janosi and P. Ramsland, unpublished data.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Baxter, R. C., and Martin, J. L. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 6898-6902[Abstract]
  2. Gargosky, S. E., Owens, P. C., Walton, P. E., Owens, J. A., Robinson, J. S., Wallace, J. C., Ballard, F. J. (1991) J. Endocrinol. 131, 491-497[Abstract]
  3. Martin, J. L., and Baxter, R. C. (1994) Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes 1, 16-21
  4. De Mellow, J. S. M., and Baxter, R. C. (1988) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 156, 199-204[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Conover, C. A. (1992) Endocrinology 130, 3191-3199[Abstract]
  6. Valentinis, B., Bhala, A., DeAngelis, T., Baserga, R., and Cohen, P. (1995) Mol. Endocrinol. 9, 361-367[Abstract]
  7. Oh, Y., Muller, H. L., Lamson, G., and Rosenfeld, R. G. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 14964-14971[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Cohen, P., Lamson, G., Okajima, T., and Rosenfeld, R. G. (1993) Growth Regul. 3, 23-26[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Rajah, R., Valentinis, B., and Cohen, P. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 12181-12188[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Clemmons, D. R. (1992) Growth Regul. 2, 80-87[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Martin, J. L., and Baxter, R. C. (1992) Growth Regul. 2, 88-99[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Rosenfeld, R. G., Pham, H., Cohen, P., Fielder, P., Gargosky, S. E., Muller, H., Nonoshita, L., Oh, Y. (1994) Acta Paediatr. Suppl. 399, 154-158[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Baxter, R. C., and Martin, J. L. (1986) J. Clin. Invest. 78, 1504-1512[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Baxter, R. C., Bayne, M. L., and Cascieri, M. A. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 60-65[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Wood, W. I., Cachianes, G., Henzel, W. J., Winslow, G. A., Spencer, S. A., Hellmiss, R., Martin, J. L., Baxter, R. C. (1988) Mol. Endocrinol. 2, 1176-1185[Abstract]
  16. Zhou, C., Abaigar, L., and Jong, A. Y. (1990) BioTechniques 8, 503 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Tabor, S., and Richardson, C. C. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 4767-4771[Abstract]
  18. Chaney, W. G., Howard, D. R., Pollard, J. W., Sallustio, S., Stanley, P. (1986) Somatic Cell Mol. Genet. 12, 237-244[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Martin, J. L., and Baxter, R. C. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 8754-8760[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Baxter, R. C., Martin, J. L., and Beniac, V. A. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 11843-11848[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Martin, J. L., Ballesteros, M., and Baxter, R. C. (1992) Endocrinology 131, 1703-1710[Abstract]
  23. Firth, S. M., and Baxter, R. C. (1996) Prog. Growth Factor Res. 6, 223-229
  24. Booth, B. A., Boes, M., Andress, D. L., Dake, B. L., Kiefer, M. C., Maack, C., Linhardt, R. J., Bar, K., Caldwell, E. E., Weiler, J., Bar, R. S. (1995) Growth Regul. 5, 1-17[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Holman, S. R., and Baxter, R. C. (1996) Growth Regul. 6, 42-47[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Drop, S. L. S., Brinkman, A., Kortleve, D. J., Groffen, C. A. H., Schuller, A., Zwarthoff, E. C. (1991) in Modern Concepts of Insulin-like Growth Factors (Spencer, E. M., ed), pp. 311-328, Elsevier, San Francisco
  27. Sommer, A., Maack, C. A., Spratt, S. K., Mascarenhas, D., Tressel, T. J., Rhodes, E. T., Lee, R., Roumas, M., Tatsuno, G. P., Flynn, J. A., Gerber, N., Taylor, J., Cudny, H., Nanney, L., Hunt, T. K., Spencer, E. M. (1991) in Modern Concepts of Insulin-like Growth Factors (Spencer, E. M., ed), pp. 715-728, Elsevier, San Francisco
  28. Ho, P. J., and Baxter, R. C. (1997) Endocrinology 138, 3811-3818[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Brinkman, A., Kortleve, D. J., Zwarthoff, E. C., Drop, S. L. S. (1991) Mol. Endocrinol. 5, 987-994[Abstract]
  30. Zapf, J., Born, W., Chang, J.-Y., James, P., Froesch, E. R., Fischer, J. A. (1988) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 156, 1187-1194[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Zapf, J., Kiefer, M., Merryweather, J., Masiarz, F., Bauer, D., Born, W., Fischer, J. A., Froesch, E. R. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 14892-14898[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Wang, J.-F., Hampton, B., Mehlman, T., Burgess, W. H., Rechler, M. M. (1988) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 157, 718-726[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Huhtala, M.-L., Koistinen, R., Palomaki, P., Partanen, P., Bohn, H., and Seppala, M. (1986) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 141, 263-270[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Busby, W. H., Jr., Klapper, D. G., Clemmons, D. R. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 14203-14210[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Russo, V. C., Bach, L. A., and Werther, G. A. (1995) Prog. Growth Factor Res. 6, 329-336[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Hasegawa, T., Cohen, P., Hasegawa, Y., Fielder, P. J., Rosenfeld, R. G. (1995) Growth Regul. 5, 151-159[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Jones, J. I., Gockerman, A., Busby, W. H. J., Wright, G., Clemmons, D. R. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 10553-10557[Abstract]
  38. Yang, Y. W.-H., Yanagishita, M., and Rechler, M. M. (1996) Endocrinology 137, 4363-4371[Abstract]
  39. Arai, T., Parker, A., Busby, W. J., Jr., Clemmons, D. R. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 20388-20393[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Fowlkes, J. L., and Serra, D. M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 14676-14679[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Lee, C. Y., and Rechler, M. M. (1995) Endocrinology 136, 668-678[Abstract]
  42. Barreca, A., Ponzani, P., Arvigo, M., Giordano, G., and Minuto, F. (1995) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 80, 1318-1324[Abstract]
  43. Baxter, R. C. (1990) Biochem. J. 271, 773-777[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Leong, S. R., Baxter, R. C., Camerato, T., Dai, J., and Wood, W. I. (1992) Mol. Endocrinol. 6, 870-876[Abstract]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.