Inhibition of p75 Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor by Antisense Oligonucleotides Increases Hypoxic Injury and beta -Amyloid Toxicity in Human Neuronal Cell Line*

(Received for publication, September 16, 1996)

Yong Shen Dagger §, Rena Li and Kazumi Shiosaki Dagger

From the Dagger  Neuroscience Department, Pharmaceutical Discovery Division, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois 60064-3500 and the  Department of Psychiatry, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky 40292

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Recent evidence indicates that tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha ) is up-regulated following brain injury and in neurodegenerative disorders such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, and Alzheimer's disease. TNF-alpha elicits its biological effects through two distinct TNF receptor (TNFR) subtypes: p55 TNFR (TNFR1) and p75 TNFR (TNFR2). Studies have demonstrated that the p55 TNFR contributes to cell death, whereas the role of the p75 TNFR in neuronal viability is unclear. To better understand the role of p75 TNFR, we treated human neuronal SH-SY5Y cells with phosphorothioate-modified antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) for p75 TNFR and established that ASO inhibited p75 TNFR expression. Treatment of SH-SY5Y cells with ASO alone did not affect cell viability, whereas treatment with both ASO and human TNF-alpha significantly increased cell death relative to treatment with TNF-alpha alone. Moreover, addition of ASO significantly increased the level of cell injury observed following hypoxic conditions or exposure of beta -amyloid peptide. These results indicate that inhibition of p75 TNFR using ASO increases the vulnerability of neurotypic cells to insults and suggest that the p75 TNFR may not be required for normal neuronal cell viability but rather plays a protective role following injury.


INTRODUCTION

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha ),1 an inflammatory mediator, is recently reported to be up-regulated following brain trauma (1, 2) and ischemic injury (3, 4), and in multiple sclerosis (5, 6), Parkinson's disease (7), and Alzheimer's disease (8). Studies have shown that TNF-alpha can elicit either a trophic or toxic effect, which is dependent on the target cell type. For example, TNF-alpha is toxic to human oligodendrocytes (9) and neuronal cells (10, 11), but it is trophic to rat hippocampal neurons (12). Since TNF-alpha elicits its biological effects through activation of two distinct receptors, p55 TNFR and p75 TNFR, both of which have been cloned (13-15), we hypothesized that the distinct TNF receptor subtypes might contribute to the multiple biological functions of TNF-alpha . Reports indicate that the p55 TNFR may contribute to cell death (16), whereas the role of the p75 TNFR in neuronal cell function is not clear. Here we show that inhibition of p75 TNFR by antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) increased the magnitude of neuronal cell death induced by TNF-alpha , hypoxic injury or beta -amyloid peptide (Abeta ) as measured by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release. This novel finding provides evidence that the p75 TNFR might play a protective role following neuronal insult.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Cell Cultures

Human neuronal-like cells, SH-SY5Y, were cultured in a 1:1 ratio of minimum Eagle's medium/F-12 medium, 15% fetal calf serum (Life Technologies, Inc.), and 10 µM retinoic acid (RA, Sigma). The cells were seeded at 25,000 cells/well in a 24-well plate for cytotoxicity assays or 3 × 106 cells in Petri dishes for radioimmunoprecipitation study. The medium was replaced every 3 days. Treatments were given to the cells in serum-free medium with 1:100 N2-supplement (Life Technologies, Inc.) 50% minimum Eagle's medium and 50% F-12.

RT-PCR

The PCR technique was used to amplify cDNA derived from RNA extracted from RA-differentiated SH-SY5Y cells as described previously (17). The PCR-forward oligonucleotide primer for p75 TNFR was 5'-GGTCACGCAACCTGTCTT-3', and backward oligonucleotide primer for p75 TNFR was 5'-GGCTTCATCCCAGCATCA-3'. PCR-forward oligonucleotides primer for p55 TNFR was 5'-TCGATTTGCTGTACCAAGTG-3', and backward oligonucleotides primer for p55 TNFR was 5'-GAAAATGACCAGGGGCAACAG-3'. After an initial denaturation step at 94 °C for 5 min, the cycle was initiated, which consisted of denaturing for 1 min at 94 °C, annealing for 2 min at 53 °C, and extending for 2 min at 72 °C. The cycle was repeated 35 times. Control reactions in the absence of RT with RNA template yielded no detectable product. A proportion (25%) of the reaction mixture was run in an agarose gel (1.2%).

Preparation of p75 TNFR Antisense Oligonucleotides

Both sense and antisense p75 TNFR oligonucleotide phosphorothioates were synthesized on an Applied Biosystems model 392 DNA synthesizer using phosphoramidite chemistry. Oligonucleotides were purified by reverse-phase chromatography using Oligo-Pak oligonucleotide purification columns (Milligen) as reported (18). The p75 TNFR antisense oligonucleotide sequence was 5'-AGCACATCTGAGCTGTCT-3' overlapping to the code for the initiation site of methionine on the human p75 TNFR gene (19). The p55 TNFR antisense oligonucleotide sequence was 5'-CCACCTCTCCGGGTACGG-3' overlapping to the code for the initiation site of methionine on the human p55 TNFR gene (20). The sense oligonucleotides for each receptor subtype were the exact inverse complement of the antisense oligonucleotides. Lyophilized oligonucleotides were dissolved in sterile water to prepare stock solutions, which were stored at -70 °C until use.

Hypoxic Exposure

The cells were first transferred into a serum-free medium and then placed in a modular incubator containing 5% carbon dioxide and 95% nitrogen at 37 °C. Following desired exposure (6 h), cultures were returned to a normoxic atmosphere of 5% carbon dioxide and 95% room air at 37 °C.

Preparations of Human Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha and Abeta

Human tumor necrosis factor-alpha (R & D Systems) was aliquoted into 1 µg/ml of medium and then diluted into 20 ng/ml with serum-free N2 medium. Abeta -(1-42) was dissolved in dry Me2SO at 6.5 mM and then diluted with serum-free N2 medium.

Immunoprecipitation of p75 TNFR

RA-differentiated SH-SY5Y cells (3 × 106) were cultured with the medium without methionine and cysteine for 2 h followed by incubation with [35S]methionine and [35S]cysteine (50 µCi/ml, DuPont NEN) in methionine- and cysteine-free medium at 37 °C. Fifteen hours later, cells were washed twice for 15 min each. Cell lysates were harvested and centrifuged at 45,000 rpm at 4 °C for 30 min, incubated with p75 TNFR antibody (polyclonal detection antibody, R & D Systems, 1:500) for 16 h at 4 °C, and precipitated with Staphylococcus protein A (Boehringer Mannheim). The immunoprecipitates were resolved in a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. After electrophoresis, gels were fixed in 10% acetic acid and 50% methanol solution and then incubated in Enlightning (DuPont) for 30 min with rocking. Bands in dried gels were detected by autoradiography.

Western Blotting Procedure

RA-differentiated SH-SY5Y cells were cultured without fetal calf serum for 24 h. Cells were then lysed with deoxycholate (5 mg/ml), phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (0.175 mg/ml), and aprotinin (100 kallikrein-inactivating units/ml). The lysate was analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Enprotech) 10-20% Tris/glycine gradient gel and then electrotransferred onto Immobilon-P (Millipore). Blots were saturated in a 5% nonfat dry milk phosphate-buffered saline with Tween 20 for 60 min at room temperature and then incubated with p55 TNFR antibody 1:1000 (polyclonal detection antibody, R & D Systems) for 60 min. After 3 washings with 0.1% Tween 20/phosphate-buffered saline, horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibody 1:1000 (Amersham) was added to the blots for 2 h at room temperature. Finally, the blots were washed with Tween 20/phosphate-buffered saline and developed with the ECL Western blotting detection system (Amersham).

Cytotoxicity Assay

For quantitative assessment of neuronal cell damage, the release of LDH from degenerating neurons was measured using a CytoTox 96 non-radioactive cytotoxicity assay kit (Promega) as described previously (17). This biochemical index correlated with the morphological estimate. The percentage of LDH release was calculated as the portion of LDH in supernatant over total LDH from both supernatant and cell lysate.


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Establishment of p75 TNFR Protein Expression in Human Neuronal Cells and Its Inhibition by ASO

We used RA-differentiated SH-SY5Y cells, considered to represent human neuronal-type cells, as our in vitro model. Results from RT-PCR demonstrated that both the p55 and p75 TNFRs were detected at the message level (Fig. 1) in RA-differentiated SH-SY5Y cells. The sequences of two excised DNA bands of both TNFRs are identical to published ones (data not shown). Western blotting or immunoprecipitation studies have shown that these receptors were expressed at the protein level (Fig. 2a, p75 TNFR; Fig. 2b, p55 TNFR). These results are consistent with a report that another human neuronal-like cell line (SKNBE) expresses endogenous TNFRs (21). To investigate a potential role of p75 TNFR in neuronal cell survival, we synthesized phosphorothioate-modified ASO for p75 TNFR in which the nucleotide sequence overlaps the code for the methionine initiation site on the human p75 TNFR gene (14). We confirmed by immunoprecipitation that treatment of RA-differentiated SH-SY5Y cells with ASO (5-10 µM) directed at the p75 TNFR blocked expression of p75 TNFR (Fig. 2a, ASO-1 and ASO-2). Expression of p75 TNFR was almost completely inhibited by ASO at 10 µM (Fig. 2a, ASO-2) compared with that at 5 µM (Fig. 2a, ASO-1). Moreover, a number of studies were conducted to establish the specificity of the ASO treatment (22, 23). Control experiments in RA-differentiated SH-SY5Y cells showed that expression of p75 TNFR protein was not affected in cells treated with hypoxia or Abeta -(1-42) alone, sense oligonucleotides (SO) alone, or co-treated with SO and hypoxia or Abeta -(1-42) (Fig. 2a). Furthermore, protein expression of the p55 TNFR was not affected in RA-differentiated SH-SY5Y cells following treatment with the p75-directed ASO (Fig. 2b).


Fig. 1. Detection of mRNA expression of both p55 and p75 TNFRs by RT-PCR in RA-differentiated SH-SY5Y cells. +, RT-PCR; -, no RT negative control.
[View Larger Version of this Image (48K GIF file)]



Fig. 2. a, radioimmunoprecipitation of p75 TNFR and decreased p75 TNFR protein levels in RA-differentiated SH-SY5Y by antisense oligonucleotides for p75 TNFR. Pt, purified p75 TNFR (1 ng of recombinant human TNF RII (p75), R & D Systems) as a positive control; ASO-1, antisense oligonucleotides for p75 TNFR (5 µM); ASO-2, antisense oligonucleotides for p75 TNFR (10 µM); NT, no treatment; HPX, hypoxia for 6 h; Abeta , Abeta -(1-42) (10 µM); SO-1, sense oligonucleotides for p75 TNFR (10 µM); SO-2, sense oligonucleotides for p75 TNFR (10 µM) plus Abeta -(1-42) (10 µM); SO-3, sense oligonucleotides for p75 TNFR (10 µM) plus hypoxia for 6 h. b, Western blot of p55 TNFR from RA-differentiated SH-SY5Y cells. No significant alteration of the p55 TNFR protein level by antisense oligonucleotides for p75 TNFR was found. ASO-p55, antisense oligonucleotides for p55 TNFR (10 µM); NT, no treatment; ASO-p75, antisense oligonucleotides for p75 TNFR; Pt, purified p55 TNFR (1 ng of recombinant human TNF RI (p55), R & D Systems) as a positive control.
[View Larger Version of this Image (17K GIF file)]


Increased Cell Degeneration Induced by hTNF-alpha

To assess whether oligonucleotide treatments altered cell viability under basal conditions, the levels of LDH released from RA-differentiated SH-SY5Y cells treated with ASO and from cells treated with the corresponding SO for p75 TNFR were compared to non-treated control levels. No significant differences in LDH levels were detected following either ASO or SO for p75 TNFR treatment (10 µM) compared with the no treatment control (Fig. 3). Furthermore, no significant differences in LDH levels were observed in the cells treated with either ASO or SO for p55 TNFR treatment (10 µM) compared with the no treatment control (data not shown). Moreover, co-treatment of RA-differentiated SH-SY5Y cells with ASO for p75 TNFR (10 µM) and hTNF-alpha (20 ng/ml) produced significantly higher levels of LDH release compared to hTNF-alpha treatment alone (Fig. 3). Co-treatment with SO and hTNF-alpha did not affect the level of LDH release relative to hTNF-alpha treatment alone (Fig. 3). To support the findings that inhibition of p75 TNFR expression increases vulnerability of the cell to hTNF-alpha , we added anti-human p75 TNFR monoclonal neutralizing antibody into the cells to neutralize the biological activity of human p75 TNFR but not p55 TNFR (21, 22) and then treated the cells with hTNF-alpha (20 ng/ml). We found a similar increase in LDH release relative to that observed following treatment with ASO for p75 TNFR (Fig. 3).


Fig. 3. Inhibition of antisense oligonucleotides for p75 TNFR increased neuronal cell death induced by TNF-alpha and hypoxic injury. ASO, antisense oligonucleotides for p75 TNFR (10 µM); SO, sense oligonucleotides for p75 TNFR (10 µM); Ab, anti-p75 human TNFR neutralizing antibody (1.0 µg/ml, R & D Systems); hTNF-alpha , 20 ng/ml; Hypoxia, oxygen deprivation for 6 h; hTNF-alpha + SO, co-treated with hTNF-alpha (20 ng/ml) and sense oligonucleotides for p75 TNFR (10 µM); hTNF-alpha  + ASO, co-treated with hTNF-alpha (20 ng/ml) and antisense oligonucleotides for p75 TNFR (10 µM). hTNF-alpha + Ab, co-treated with hTNF-alpha (20 ng/ml) and anti-p75 human TNFR neutralizing antibody (1.0 µg/ml); Hypoxia + SO, cells were oxygen deprived for 6 h and treated with sense oligonucleotides for p75 TNFR (10 µM); Hypoxia + ASO, cells were oxygen deprived for 6 h and treated with antisense oligonucleotides for p75 TNFR (10 µM); Hypoxia + Ab, cells were oxygen deprived for 6 h and treated with anti-p75 human TNFR neutralizing antibody (1.0 µg/ml). SH-SY5Y cells were cultured and differentiated as described previously (12), and treatment was conducted in serum-free, N2-supplemented 50% minimum Eagle's medium and 50% F-12 medium. LDH was measured at 48 h, and values represent the mean ± S.D. from five independent experiments each conducted in triplicate (*, p < 0.05 versus vehicle (where vehicle = no treatment or ASO, or SO treatment alone); **, p < 0.01 versus vehicle, analysis of variance). Preparations of Abeta and hypoxic exposure are briefly described under "Experimental Procedures."
[View Larger Version of this Image (28K GIF file)]


Increased Cell Degeneration Induced by Hypoxic Injury and beta -Amyloid

RA-differentiated SH-SY5Y cells exposed to oxygen deprivation for 6 h displayed morphological changes, e.g. swollen cell bodies (data not shown), and produced increased levels of LDH release relative to controls (Fig. 3). Treatment of ASO for p75 TNFR during the 6 h of hypoxic exposure resulted in a significant increase in LDH release compared with hypoxia alone or treatment with SO under the identical hypoxic conditions (Fig. 3). We found a similar increase in LDH release from hypoxic cells treated with anti-human p75 TNFR antibody (Fig. 3). We also extended our studies by using Abeta -(1-42). Co-treatment of RA-differentiated SH-SY5Y cells with the ASO (10 µM) and Abeta (5 µM) produced significantly higher levels of LDH release compared with Abeta treatment alone (Fig. 4). Treatment of RA-differentiated SH-SY5Y cells with a combination of SO and Abeta did not affect the level of LDH release relative to Abeta treatment alone (Fig. 4).


Fig. 4. Inhibition of antisense oligonucleotides for p75 TNFR increased neuronal cell death induced by Abeta toxicity. ASO, antisense oligonucleotides (10 µM); SO, sense oligonucleotides for p75 TNFR (10 µM); Abeta (1-42), 5 µM; Abeta (1-42) + ASO, co-treated with Abeta (1-42) (5 µM) and antisense oligonucleotides (10 µM); Abeta (1-42) + SO, co-treated with Abeta (1-42) (5 µM) and sense oligonucleotides (10 µM).
[View Larger Version of this Image (25K GIF file)]


The observation that ASO directed for p75 TNFR does not alter cell viability despite inhibition of p75 TNFR protein expression suggested that p75 TNFR may not be required for normal neuronal functioning under basal conditions. Our data also demonstrated that inhibition of p75 TNFR using ASO increased vulnerability of neurotypic cells toward injury induced by hTNF-alpha , hypoxia, or Abeta . These results were further supported by similar results obtained using anti-human p75 TNFR-neutralizing antibody, suggesting that p75 TNFR may play a critical role in the ability of neurons to respond to insults. In addition, treating human neurotypic cells with ASO in vitro has proven to be a useful technique to suppress specific gene expression and to enable study of the functional significance of the corresponding protein (24, 25).

Neurons, akin to a number of other cell types, can express both p55 and p75 TNFRs (19, 26, 27); the genes for these receptors are located on human chromosomes 12 and 1, respectively. Based on amino acid sequencing, there is a 28% overall homology between p55 and p75 TNFRs. The amino acid sequences in the extracellular domains, transmembrane region, and intracellular domains between these two TNFR subtypes share 22, 28, and 10% homologies, respectively. The low level of homology suggests that distinct functions may be associated with each of these two receptors. Thus, TNF-alpha can elicit either a trophic or toxic response in neurons, which could be dependent on which TNF receptor subtype is activated. Recent studies indicate that the p55 TNFR is responsible for cell death signaling through activation of phospholipase A2 and NF-kappa B (28). Recent studies reported that knocking out both p55 and p75 TNF receptors increased neurodegeneration induced by ischemia in mouse brain (29). Our results are the first to indicate that the p75 TNFR may protect human neurons against insults, e.g. exposure to hypoxia or beta -amyloid. Thus when a neuron is insulted, TNF-alpha may be released to activate the p75 TNFR (30, 31), which in turn may trigger a series of cellular events, e.g. secretion of trophic factors (32), attenuation of calcium disruption, or free radical formation (12), that enables the cell to defend itself against the insult. Therefore, p75 TNFR may be necessary for neuronal cell survival under pathological conditions following injury, and conditions that attenuate levels or functioning of the p75 TNFR may render cells more vulnerable to insult and disease.


FOOTNOTES

*   The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§   To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Neuroscience, 47C/AP10, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL 60064. E-mail: Shen.Yong{at}igate.abbott.com.
1    The abbreviations used are: TNF, tumor necrosis factor; TNFR, TNF receptor; ASO, antisense oligonucleotide; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; RA, retinoic acid; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; hTNF, human TNF; Abeta , beta -amyloid peptide; SO, sense oligonucleotide; RT, reverse transcriptase.

Acknowledgments

We thank Tom Kavanaugh for providing phosphorothioate-modified oligonucleotides and Richard Perner for providing Abeta -(1-42). We also appreciate very much Drs. Mike Williams, James Kerwin, and Art Hancock for their helpful discussion, critical comments, and support.


REFERENCES

  1. Tchelingerian, J.-L., Quinonero, J., Booss, J., and Jacque, C. (1993) Neuron 10, 213-224 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Goodman, J. C., Robertson, C. S., Grossman, R. G., and Narayan, R. K. (1990) J. Neuroimmunol. 30, 213-217 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Liu, T., Clark, R. K., McDonnell, P. C., Young, P. R., White, R. F., Barone, F. C., and Feuerstein, G. Z. (1994) Stroke 25, 1481-1488 [Abstract]
  4. Buttini, M., Appel, K., Sauter, A., Gebicke-Haerter, P.-J., and Boddeke, H. W. G. M. (1996) Neuroscience 71, 1-16 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Hofman, F. M., Hinton, D. R., Johnson, K., and Merril, J. E. (1989) J. Exp. Med. 170, 607-612 [Abstract]
  6. Sharief, M. K., and Hentges, R. (1991) N. Engl. J. Med. 325, 467-472 [Abstract]
  7. Mogi, M., Harada, M., Riederer, P., Narabayashi, H., Fujita, K., and Nagatsu, T. (1994) Neurosci. Lett. 165, 208-210 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Filit, H., Ding, W., Buee, L., Kalman, J., Altstiel, L., Lawlor, B., and Wolf-Klein, G. (1991) Neurosci. Lett. 129, 318-320 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Louis, J.-C., Magal, E., Takayama, S., and Varon, S. (1993) Science 259, 689-692 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Chao, C. C., and Hu, S. (1994) Dev. Neurosci. 16, 172-179 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Talley, A. K., Dewhurst, S., Perry, S. W., Dollard, S. C., Gummuluru, S., Fine, S. M., New, D., Epstein, L. G., Gendelman, H. E., and Gelbard, H. A. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 2359-2366
  12. Cheng, B., Christakos, S., and Mattson, M. P. (1994) Neuron 12, 139-153 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Loetscher, H., Pan, Y.-C. E., Lahm, H-W., Gentz, R., Brockhaus, M., Tabuchi, H., and Lesslauer, W. (1990) Cell 61, 351-359 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Heller, R. A., Song, K., Fan, N., and Chang, D. J. (1992) Cell 70, 47-56 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Schall, T. J., Lewis, M., Koller, K. J., Lee, A., Rice, G. C., Wong, G. H. W., Gatanaga, T., Granger, G. A., Lentz, R., Raab, H., Kohr, W. J., and Goeddel, D. V. (1990) Cell 61, 361-370 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Tartaglia, L. A., Ayres, T. M., Wong, G. H. W., and Goeddel, D. V. (1993) Cell 74, 845-853 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Shen, Y., Halperin, J. A., and Lee, C.-M. (1995) Brain Res. 671, 282-292 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Agrawal, S., Temsamani, J., and Tang, J. Y. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 7595-7599 [Abstract]
  19. Smith, C. A., Davis, T., Anderson, D., Solam, L., Beckmann, M. P., Jerzy, R., Dower, S. K., Cosman, D., and Goodwin, R. G. (1990) Science 248, 1019-1023 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Himmer, A., Maurer-Fogy, I., Kronke, M., Scheurich, P., Pfizenmaier, K., Lantz, M., Olsson, I., Hauptmann, R., Stratowa, C., and Adolf, G. R. (1990) DNA Cell Biol. 9, 705-715 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Bradley, J. R., Sathia, T., and Pober, J. S. (1995) Am. J. Pathol. 146, 27-32 [Abstract]
  22. Sarin, A., Conan-Cibotti, M., and Henkart, P. A. (1995) J. Immunol. 155, 3716-3718 [Abstract]
  23. Chambaut-Guerin, A. M., Matinez, M. C., Hamimi, C., Gauthereau, X., and Nunez, J. (1995) J. Neurochem. 65, 537-544 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Wagner, R. (1994) Nature 373, 333-335
  25. Retaux, S., McNeill, L., and Harris, W. A. (1996) Neuron 16, 63-75 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Kinouchi, R., Brown, G., Pasternak, G., and Donner, D. B. (1991) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 181, 1532-1538 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Wolvers, D. A., Marquette, C., Berkenbosch, F., and Habour, F. (1993) Eur. Cytokine Netw. 4, 377-381 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Miura, M., Friedlander, R. M., and Yuan, J. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 8318-8322 [Abstract]
  29. Bruce, A. J., Boling, W., Kindy, M. S., Peschon, J., Kraemer, P. J., Carpenter, M. K., Holtsberg, F. W., and Mattson, M. P. (1996) Nat. Med. 2, 1-7
  30. Wieslander, A. P., Nordin, M. K., Martinson, E., Kjellstrand, P. T., and Boberg, U. C. (1993) Clin. Nephrol. 39, 343-348 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Vesanen, M., Wessman, M., Salminen, M., and Vaheri, A. (1992) J. Gen. Virol. 73, 1753-1760 [Abstract]
  32. Scheil, S., Ludecke, G., and Unsicker, K. (1994) Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 12, 405-410 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.