Functional Expression of a cDNA to Human Acyl-coenzyme A:Cholesterol Acyltransferase in Yeast
SPECIES-DEPENDENT SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY AND INHIBITOR SENSITIVITY*

(Received for publication, September 23, 1996, and in revised form, November 11, 1996)

Hongyuan Yang Dagger , Debra Cromley §, Hongxing Wang §, Jeffrey T. Billheimer § and Stephen L. Sturley Dagger par **

From the Dagger  Institute of Human Nutrition, par  Departments of Pediatrics and Physiology and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York 10032 and § DuPont-Merck Research Laboratories, Experimental Station, Wilmington, Delaware 19880-0400

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

We have identified two yeast genes with similarity to a human cDNA encoding acyl-coenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT). Deletion of both yeast genes results in a viable cell with undetectable esterified sterol (Yang, H., Bard, M., Bruner, D. A., Gleeson, A., Deckelbaum, R. J., Aljinovic, G., Pohl, T., Rothstein, R., and Sturley, S. L. (1996) Science 272, 1353-1356). Here, we expressed the human cDNA in the yeast double mutant, resulting in high level production of ACAT protein, but low in vivo esterification of ergosterol, the predominant yeast sterol. The activity of the human enzyme was increased by incubation of these cells with 25-hydroxy, cholesterol, an established positive regulator of mammalian sterol esterification. In contrast, the yeast enzymes were unaffected by this reagent. In vitro microsomal assays indicated no sterol esterification in extracts from the double mutant. However, significant activity was detected from strains expressing human ACAT when cholesterol was equilibrated with the microsomal membranes. The human enzyme in yeast utilized cholesterol as the preferred sterol and was sensitive to competitive (S58035) and non-competitive (DuP 128) ACAT inhibitors. The yeast esterifying enzymes exhibited a diminished sterol substrate preference and were sensitive only to S58035. Human ACAT had a broad acyl-CoA substrate specificity, the other substrate for this reaction. By contrast, the yeast enzymes had a marked preference for specific acyl-CoAs, particularly unsaturated C18 forms. These results confirm the yeast genes as functional homologs of the human gene and demonstrate that the enzymes confer substrate specificity to the esterification reaction in both organisms.


INTRODUCTION

Free sterols are essential components of all eukaryotic membranes and exert a major influence on membrane fluidity and permeability and the activity of membrane-bound proteins (2). The esterification of sterol, i.e. the conjugation of fatty acids with sterols, plays an important role in sterol homeostasis, since it converts excess free sterol into a cytoplasmic storage form. In human cells, this esterification reaction is mediated by the enzyme, acyl-coenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT (3)).1 ACAT activity has been localized to the rough endoplasmic reticulum and is present in all tissues tested (4). ACAT has several physiological functions with possible pathological consequences. In addition to maintaining intracellular cholesterol homeostasis, the ACAT reaction has been suggested to be involved in absorption of cholesterol from the intestinal lumen (5). Furthermore, the cholesterol ester synthesis rate in the liver may affect the secretion of very low density lipoprotein and thus plasma cholesterol and triglyceride levels (6). In adrenal cells, cholesterol ester is a sterol source for acute steroid hormone production. Most profoundly, the up-regulation of ACAT in macrophages and smooth muscle cells, accompanied by the accumulation of cholesterol ester in the arterial wall (foam cells), is an early event in the formation of an atherosclerotic plaque (7, 8).

Based on these functions of ACAT, pharmacological inhibitors of the esterification reaction have been proposed and developed as potential hypocholesterolemic and anti-atherogenic agents (9, 10). Such inhibitors could reduce cholesterol uptake in the intestine, increase the conversion of free cholesterol to bile acids in the liver, reduce very low density lipoprotein secretion, and decrease the accumulation of cholesterol ester in cells in the vascular wall. Despite the strong inhibitory effect of these compounds in vitro and in animal models, they have not been efficacious in lowering serum cholesterol in human trials (11-13). Whether the absorbable ACAT inhibitors may prevent foam cell formation is currently unknown. Sandoz 58035, one of the first specific ACAT inhibitors, is a competitive fatty acid homologue (14) while DuP 128 is a potent, non-competitive inhibitor of the reaction (IC50 of 10 nm (15, 16)). Compounds such as these, which inhibit mammalian ACAT by different mechanisms, may be useful in studying esterification in other organisms, and thus afford a more thorough overall understanding of the ACAT reaction.

The sterol esterification reaction is conserved from yeast to humans (17). In each organism, the predominant sterol is structurally distinct. In mammalian cells, the major sterol source is cholesterol; in yeast, it is ergosterol. Microsomal preparations from rat liver exhibit marked specificity of the ACAT reaction for cholesterol. Notably, the reaction was very sensitive to changes in the sterol side chain; the addition of a 24-beta -methyl group, as in ergosterol, resulted in esterification at about 5% the rate of cholesterol. In contrast, yeast microsomal preparations esterified both ergosterol and cholesterol to similar extents (18). The predominant fatty acyl-CoA in each species has not been as well studied. However, an order of preference for the rat liver enzyme was established as oleoyl > palmitoyl > stearoyl > linoleoyl-CoA (19). Whether the ACAT homologs in different species prefer one particular acyl-CoA substrate over others is unknown.

A comprehensive understanding of the ACAT reaction and the further development of useful ACAT inhibitors has been hampered by the inability to biochemically purify the ACAT enzyme to homogeneity. A human macrophage ACAT cDNA has recently been identified (20). By homology searching with this sequence as a probe, we identified two yeast ACAT homologs, ARE1 and ARE2 (for ACAT related enzymes 1 and 2, respectively).2 Disruption of these genes produced a viable yeast cell with no detectable sterol ester (1). In the current study, we determined the relative enzyme activities of Are1p and Are2p using a microsomal in vitro sterol esterification assay. Subsequently, we successfully expressed a human ACAT cDNA in the are1- are2- yeast strain. This facilitated the comparison of sterol and acyl-CoA substrate specificities and inhibitor sensitivities of the yeast and human enzymes.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Yeast Strains, Transformations, and Media

Congenic yeast strains with deletions in the yeast homologs of human ACAT, ARE1 and ARE2, have been described previously (1). Four strains of common genetic background (can1-100, his3-11, 15, leu2-3, 112, trp1-1, ura3-1) were used: SCY059 (MATalpha , met14Delta HpaI-SalI, are1Delta NA::HIS3, are2Delta ::LEU2), SCY060 (MATalpha , ade2-1, are1Delta NA::HIS3), SCY061 (MATa, met14Delta HpaI-SalI, are2Delta ::LEU2), and SCY062 (MATa, ade2-1). Transformation of yeast was performed with lithium acetate by amino acid prototrophy selection (22). Yeast extract, Yeast Nitrogen Base, Bacto-peptone, and Bacto-agar were from Difco; D-dextrose, D-galactose, and D-raffinose were from Sigma. Complete (YEPD), synthetic complete (SC), or SC lacking uracil (SC-ura) media were prepared as described (23, 24).

Polymerase Chain Reaction Amplification of a Human ACAT cDNA and Construction of the Yeast Expression Plasmid

Competent cells of Escherichia coli strain DH5alpha (Life Technologies, Inc.) and DNA modifying enzymes (Promega) were used according to the manufacturers instructions. The human ACAT cDNA sequence was obtained from a human leukocyte cDNA library by polymerase chain reaction amplification as described (25). The polymerase chain reaction fragment corresponding to the coding region flanked by NotI and ApaI sites was subcloned into the pCMV vector (Invitrogen) at the same sites. The pCMV vector containing ACAT was cut with ApaI and made blunt ended by T4 DNA polymerase treatment and then digested with NotI. The ensuing fragment contains a full-length human ACAT open reading frame with the translation initiation codon four bases away from the NotI site. The yeast shuttle vector pRS-426-GAL was cut by SacI and blunt ended with the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I and then digested by NotI. The NotI, ApaI fragment containing ACAT and the linearized vector were ligated by T4 DNA ligase to construct the ACAT expression vector pRS426-ACAT. This placed the ACAT open reading frame directly downstream of the yeast GAL1/10 promoter (Fig. 1A).


Fig. 1. A, expression of human macrophage ACAT in pRS426GP. The ACAT open reading frame was inserted at the NotI and SacI sites, downstream of the promoter of the GAL1/10 gene (GAL1/10p) as described in the text to produce pRS426-ACAT. URA3 and Ampr denote selectable markers for yeast and E. coli, respectively. The yeast and bacterial origins of replication (2 µm and ori, respectively) are indicated. B, immunoblot of human ACAT in protein extracts from cells transformed with pRS426-ACAT. Double mutant cells (are1- are2-), transformed with pRS426-ACAT (hACAT) or with pRS426GP (vector) were induced by growth in galactose. Proteins were analyzed by immunoblotting as described under "Experimental Procedures." Equivalent amounts of protein extracts from mouse adrenal cells were loaded for comparison. Molecular weight reference markers (Bio-Rad) are indicated (M). The arrow indicates the position of the DM10 immunoreactive product in extracts from murine adrenals. The expressed form of hACAT in yeast is of coincident mobility.
[View Larger Version of this Image (21K GIF file)]


SDS-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis and Immunoblotting Analysis

Yeast cells were grown overnight in SC-ura dextrose (2%) liquid medium. Cells were harvested at mid-log phase and washed with sterile water twice. The cells were resuspended in 10 ml of SC-ura medium containing 2% galactose and 1% raffinose and grown overnight. Cells were lysed by vortexing with glass beads in 0.01 M borate, 0.15 M NaCl and resuspension of the low speed pellet in 1% SDS, M urea. Denaturing gel electrophoresis (5 µg of total protein per lane) was performed using 12% polyacrylamide for the resolving gel in the presence of 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (26). After SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis separation, the proteins were electroblotted to nitrocellulose. The membrane was blocked in 5% non-fat milk in 20 mM Tris-HCl, 137 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Tween 20 (TBST) and probed with 0.28 µg/ml of the DM10 alpha ACAT antibody (27) in TBST, 1% non-fat milk for 1 h. Detection of the immune complexes was attained using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary anti-rabbit IgG antibody and the ECL Western blotting detection reagent (Amersham).

In Vivo Assays of Sterol Esterification

Yeast strains containing pRS426-ACAT or vector control were grown in 5 ml of SC-ura (2% glucose) medium to a density of 107 cells/ml. The cells were harvested, washed twice with sterile water, and then resuspended in 10 ml of SC-ura media containing 2% galactose and 1% raffinose. For experiments to test the effect of 25-hydroxycholesterol on sterol esterification, 10 or 25 µg/ml 25-hydroxycholesterol in ethanol was added to the growth medium at this point. After 4 h, 1 µCi/ml [3H]oleate in tyloxapol/ethanol (1:1) was added and cells were pulsed for a further 4 h. Total lipids were prepared and analyzed as described (1). Incorporation of label into ergosterol ester was determined after scintillation counting and normalization to a [14C]cholesterol internal standard and the dry weight of the cells. The data is expressed as means of triplicate assays over at least two experiments with the corresponding standard deviations.

In Vitro (Microsomal) Sterol Esterification Assay

Yeast cells containing pRS426-ACAT or the vector control were grown in 5 ml of SC-ura media containing 2% glucose to a density of about 108 cells/ml. The cultures were diluted to 500 ml of SC-ura media containing 2% glucose and grown overnight. The cells were harvested, washed twice with sterile water, and then resuspended in 500 ml of ura-CM media containing 2% galactose and 1% raffinose and allowed to grow for 6 h before freezing as a cell pellet. Frozen yeast pellets were quick-thawed at 37 °C, washed in 2 × pellet volumes of homogenization buffer (HB: 0.1 M potassium phosphate, 0.5 mM EDTA, 1 mM glutathione, 20 µM leupeptin, 10 µg/ml benzamidine, and 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and spun at 2,000 × g to re-pellet cells. The supernatant was removed and another 2 volumes of HB added to resuspend the cells. The suspension was shaken with intermittent cooling in the presence of 1.0 g of 0.5-mm diameter glass beads in a mini-beadbeater (Biospec Products) at 5,000 rpm for 3 × 1-min intervals. The resulting homogenate was spun at 1,000 × g for 5 min and 15,000 × g for 15 min. The supernatant was removed and spun at 105,000 × g for 1 h to pellet the microsomes. This pellet was resuspended in ACAT buffer (0.1 M potassium phosphate, 1 mM GSH, pH 7.4) and protein concentration determined (28). Microsomes were aliquoted and frozen at -70 °C. Rat liver microsomes were prepared as described previously (29).

Enzyme activity was determined by the rate of incorporation of [14C]oleoyl-CoA or [14C]cholesterol into steryl ester (29). The standard assay, in duplicate or triplicate, contained 200 µg of microsomal protein, 1 mg of bovine serum albumin, 20 nmol of oleoyl-CoA, and 20 µg of cholesterol in a final volume of 200 µl of 0.1 M potassium phosphate butter, pH 7.4, containing 1 mM glutathione. In control assays, labeled oleoyl-CoA or [14C]cholesterol was added after the reaction had been stopped. In assays where inhibitors were tested, the inhibitors were added in 5 µl of Me2SO and compared to a solvent control of 5 µl of Me2SO. S58035 and DuP 128 were used at a concentrations of 50 and 0.5 µM, respectively. For experiments on substrate preferences utilizing [14C]oleoyl-CoA (30,000 dpm/nmol), cold sterols were included whereas those utilizing [14C]cholesterol (40,000 dpm/nmol) used unlabeled acyl-CoAs. Where added, sterols were suspended in reaction buffer with the aid of Triton WR-1339 at a ratio of 30:1 (Triton/sterol, w/w) (29). After preincubation for 15 min at 37 °C, the reaction was initiated by the addition of oleoyl-CoA. The assay was stopped after 2.5 min by the addition of 4 ml of chloroform/methanol (2:1). Phase separation was induced by the addition of water (800 µl) and [3H]cholesteryl oleate (30,000 dpm) and 15 µg of cholesteryl oleate were added as the internal standard and carrier, respectively. The chloroform layer containing the lipids was dried under nitrogen and resuspended in 100 µl of chloroform for spotting on ITLC-SA thin layer plates (Gelman Sciences). Lipids were separated and quantitated as described above. The specific activity of ACAT was determined as picomoles of either cholesterol or oleoyl-CoA converted to steryl ester/min/mg of protein.


RESULTS

To initiate a molecular analysis of sterol esterification in the eukaryotic micro-organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast), we identified two yeast gene products that exhibit significant structural and functional homology to the putative catalytic component of cholesterol esterification in human macrophages. We have shown that deletion of these genes produces a yeast cell lacking sterol ester (see Ref. 1 and Fig. 2). To confirm that these genes encode catalytic components of the esterification complex we isolated microsomes from wild type, single and double are- mutant yeast strains. The in vitro measurements of sterol esterification essentially mirrored the assays performed in vivo. Deletion of both ARE1 and ARE2 produces a strain devoid of microsomal ACAT activity. ARE1 encodes the minor isoform in terms of its contribution to esterification, whereas Are2p is the major esterification enzyme (~80% of wild-type), in vitro and in vivo. The activity of the yeast isoforms in wild-type cells was elevated 2-3-fold after equilibration of exogenous cholesterol into microsomes prior to the assay (not shown). This increase in activity is similar to that observed in rat liver microsomes (29).


Fig. 2. In vivo esterification analysis of yeast cells expressing human ACAT. A, sterol esterification in wild type and are mutant yeast cells harboring the control vector (shaded bars) or the ACAT-expressing vector (black bars). Cells were grown in the presence of [3H]oleate and incorporation into sterol ester was monitored as described in the text. The error bars represent standard deviations and where absent were too small to be visible on these axis. The asterisk indicates a statistically significant increase in sterol esterification in the comparison of double mutant cells using a paired t test (p < 0.01). B, the effect of oxysterol upon in vivo sterol esterification. Wild type yeast cells (black bars) or are1- are2- mutants (shaded bars) carrying the control vector and human ACAT expressing plasmid were incubated in the presence of the indicated concentrations of 25-hydroxycholesterol. Lipids were labeled, extracted, and analyzed as above. For cells expressing human ACAT, the effect of 25 µg/ml 25-OH cholesterol was statistically significant when compared to the solvent control (paired t test, p < 0.05). DPM/mg dry weight, disintegrations per min/mg of dry weight of cells.
[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]


Table I.

In vitro microsomal esterification; ARE1 and ARE2


Esterificationa

pmol/min/mg
Wild-type 981  ± 55
ARE1 are2- 224  ± 49
are1-ARE2 637  ± 133
are1-are2- 31  ± 31
Rat liver microsomes 1350  ± 50

a  Esterification in the presence of exogenous cholesterol; ± S.D. from triplicates.

To compare and contrast the esterification activities conferred by the yeast and human enzymes, we expressed a human ACAT cDNA originally isolated from macrophages. The cDNA was fused to the divergent inducible promoter from the yeast GAL1/GAL10 genes in pRS426-ACAT as described above (Fig. 1A). A conditional promoter (in this case induced by galactose) was used to circumvent possible toxicity of high level expression of human ACAT in yeast. In fact, no toxicity was observed. The plasmid was used to transform ARE1 are2-, are1- ARE2, are1- are2-, and wild-type yeast strains. Transformants were incubated overnight in SC-ura, galactose/raffinose to induce expression of hACAT. Proteins were prepared and analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting with DM10 anti-ACAT antibody. A protein of approximately 48 kDa was detected under inducing conditions in the ACAT expressing strain and not in the non-expressing strain (vector control, Fig. 1B). The size of the protein is smaller than the predicted size of the ACAT primary translation product (63.8 kDa) but co-migrates with proteins isolated from mouse adrenal microsomes, consistent with previous reports (27, 30). The lower molecular weight species is most likely a degradation product of the hACAT protein; it is detectable in the mouse adrenal extracts on darker exposure (not shown), and is also observed in preparations described elsewhere (27).

ACAT expressing strains were assayed in vivo for their ability to esterify endogenous yeast sterols (primarily ergosterol). Despite the high level expression of hACAT protein there were no alterations in incorporation of [14C]oleate into sterol ester in wild type or single ARE mutant yeast cells. However, in the are1- are2- double disruption strain expressing pRS426-ACAT, a low but significant esterification activity was detected at about 4% of a wild type yeast cell (Fig. 2A). The activity endowed by the hACAT construct was further confirmed as genuine when it was observed to increase in response to incubation of the cells with 25-OH cholesterol (Fig. 2B). Despite this, the level of activity was not commensurate with the mass of protein observed in the immunoblot. It is possible that the human ACAT expressed in yeast lost most of its activity due to mis-folding or aberrant secondary modification of the protein.

Another explanation of the low level in vivo activity of hACAT expressed in yeast relates to the utilization of the preferred ACAT reaction substrate. In yeast, the predominant sterol is ergosterol which differs from cholesterol by the presence of unsaturation at the C-7 position and at C-22, with an extra methyl group at C-24. It has been shown that ergosterol is not a good substrate for rat liver microsomal ACAT (18). To test if the human ACAT protein expressed in yeast is functional and that the observed activity represents low affinity of the human enzyme for ergosterol, we utilized an in vitro assay system to measure ACAT activity (Table II). The addition of exogenous cholesterol to the microsomal assay greatly increased esterification by the hACAT expressing strain approximately 6-fold. This suggests that one reason for the low activity observed in vivo is the lack of appropriate substrate for the mammalian enzyme. The in vitro ACAT activity of microsomes from yeast expressing the hACAT was sensitive to both competitive (Sandoz 58035) and non-competitive (DuP 128) inhibitors. Interestingly, the endogenous yeast enzymes were only affected by the competitive inhibitor (S58035, Table II), even though DuP 128 was present at 50 times its IC50 for mammalian ACAT. This suggests that the binding site for DuP 128 is not conserved between yeast and humans. To test if the individual yeast ARE enzymes differ in their sensitivity to S58035, we prepared and assayed microsomes from single are1- and are2- mutants (strains SCY060 and SCY061). Using a range of concentrations of the inhibitor, we estimated the IC50 of Are1p and Are2p to be 31 and 34 µM, respectively, whereas the IC50 of a preparation from wild type cells was 20 µM. The IC50 of rat ACAT in the same experiment was estimated as 40 µM.

Table II.

In vitro microsomal esterification; human ACAT


Esterificationa
% Pharmacological inhibition
Endogenousb + Cholesterolc Dup128d S58035e

pmol/min/mg
Wild-type 317  ± 8.48 762  ± 52.33 0 71%
are1-are2- 24.5  ± 4.95 35  ± 25.46
are1-are2- + hACAT 60.5  ± 27.58 355.5  ± 98.29 94% 92%
Rat liver microsomes 371  ± 62.4 1334.5  ± 88.39 98% 96%

a  ± S.D. from triplicates.
b  Esterification in the presence of endogenous sterol.
c  Esterification in the presence of 100 µg/ml cholesterol.
d  Concentration of 0.5 µM.
e  Concentration of 50 µM.

Having demonstrated the activity of the human ACAT cDNA in yeast, we extended these observations to assess the affinity of the human and yeast enzymes for different sterol or acyl-CoA substrates (Tables III and IV). Despite the fact that the dominant sterol in yeast is ergosterol, the yeast ARE enzymes also readily esterified cholesterol. In contrast, human macrophage ACAT expressed in the double are mutant yeast showed a substrate selectivity similar to the mammalian enzyme as opposed to yeast, with little activity against ergosterol (Table III). Both yeast and rat enzymes esterified 7-dehydrocholesterol, while no apparent activity utilizing this substrate was observed with hACAT expressed in yeast.

Table III.

In vitro sterol substrate specificity: human macrophage ACAT versus yeast AREp


Sterol additionb Esterificationa
No sterolc + Cholesterol + Ergos +7-Dehydro

pmol/min/mg
Wild-type 66  ± 33 1081  ± 33 386  ± 58 353  ± 112
are1-are2- + hACAT 98  ± 67 305  ± 22 35  ± 35 64  ± 2
Rat liver microsomes 149  ± 20 1155  ± 107 128  ± 27 539  ± 44

a  ± S.D. from triplicates.
b  Esterification in the presence of 100 µg of sterol.
c  Esterification in the presence TR1339 only.

Table IV.

In vitro fatty acyl-CoA substrate specificity human macrophage ACAT versus Yeast AREp


Added acyl-CoAb Esterificationa
Palmityl C16:0 Stearoyl C18:0 Oleoyl C18:1 Linoleoyl C18:2 Arachidonyl C20:4

pmol/min/mg
Wild-type 68  ± 52.33 42  ± 81.32 913  ± 90.51 941  ± 330.22 96  ± 98.29
are1-are2- + hACAT 533  ± 86.97 306  ± 108.18 714  ± 57.27 618  ± 19.09 568  ± 36.06
Rat liver microsomes 769  ± 40.31 356  ± 210.72 1286  ± 183.14 1664  ± 229.81 71  ± 119.50

a  ± S.D. from triplicates.
b  Esterification in the presence of 20 nmol of acyl-CoA of the indicated carbon chain length.

To assess the acyl-CoA substrate specificity, the assay conditions were identical to those for sterol specificity except that activity was followed by the esterification of radiolabeled cholesterol in the presence of various unlabeled acyl-CoAs. Human ACAT expressed in yeast utilized various acyl-CoAs as substrates with palmitoyl, oleoyl, linoleoyl, and arachidonyl CoAs showing similar activity and stearoyl-CoA somewhat less. In contrast, yeast esterification was specific for C18 unsaturated fatty acids. Rat liver enzymes showed a broader specificity than either of the yeast enzymes, but in no case was activity against arachidonyl-CoA observed (Table IV).


DISCUSSION

Our previous demonstration of the in vivo requirement of the yeast ARE genes in sterol esterification provokes two hypotheses with regard to their role in this reaction. These proteins are homologous to a mammalian protein shown to be required for sterol esterification, in vitro (30). However, it was hypothetically possible that the ARE gene products mediate substrate transport to the rough endoplasmic reticulum, conventionally the site of esterification. A more parsimonious explanation would be that ARE1 and ARE2 encode isoforms of the catalytic components of this enzyme. We now find this latter possibility to be the case. The fact that microsomes from yeast strains deficient in ARE1, ARE2, or both genes display identical relative levels of in vitro activity to those observed in vivo, rules out a direct role for these proteins in sterol translocation. Furthermore, the substrate specificities of both the yeast and human enzymes expressed in yeast are most consistent with the ARE and hACAT proteins acting as catalytic components of the enzymatic complex as opposed to regulatory factors.

The observation of two enzymes for sterol esterification in yeast is intriguing. The requirement for multiple enzymes for the same reaction would be advantageous to a cell if one enzyme was either differentially regulated, alternatively localized, or specific for a substrate. We are currently developing reagents such as isoform-specific antibodies which will enable us to address these issues. Presently, however, we are incapable of determining if the observed difference in levels of sterol esterification observed in are1Delta or are2Delta mutants represents different rate constants for the reaction or different levels of protein expression. Clearly both enzymes are active, since a null phenotype occurs only when both genes are deleted.

To some extent the differences between the ARE isoforms and human macrophage ACAT are as interesting as their similarities. Despite the overall 49% identity at the protein level of Are1p and Are2p, the proteins are quite divergent, particularly at the NH2-terminal regions. Similarly the yeast proteins show the highest degree of conservation with human macrophage ACAT in the COOH-terminal domain. Thus far, we have been unable to distinguish Are1p and Are2p except in terms of their overall relative contributions to sterol ester mass. The human enzyme, however, is quite distinct. Yeast enzyme is neither induced by 25-hydroxycholesterol nor sensitive to the non-competitive ACAT inhibitor, DuP 128. However, the human enzyme demonstrates the predicted response to these reagents, namely increased activity and inhibition, respectively. Since the transcription of the hACAT cDNA is driven by a yeast promoter regulated only by carbon source, these responses, particularly the induction by 25-hydroxycholesterol, clearly act at a post-transcriptional point. This is in confirmation of previous studies (30). The 71% inhibition observed with S58035 in wild type yeast could be due to preferential inhibition of Are2p or to partial inhibition of both isoforms. An analysis of microsomal preparations from single are- mutants refutes this latter hypothesis; Are1p and Are2p were equally sensitive to the fatty-acyl analogue. Our observations contradict those of Yu et al. (21), who suggest that non-competitive inhibitors of the human ACAT reaction, also inhibit the activity of the yeast enzymes. It should be noted that these workers used the inhibitors at concentrations 3 orders of magnitude higher than the observed IC50 for the human reaction. We therefore conclude that the yeast enzymes differ at whatever domain responds to these reagents. This is consistent with the differences we observed in response to another regulatory molecule, 25-hydroxycholesterol.

In addition to demonstrating the differences between the yeast and human reaction, our work also confirms the fidelity of the yeast expression system with which to study the human enzyme. It is clear that the expression of hACAT in yeast occurs at high levels in terms of mass and that the reaction proceeds in a similar manner to that performed in mammalian cells. Thus, it seems likely that the sterol substrate specificities and pharmacological inhibitions described here for recombinant hACAT, essentially reproduce those observed with the enzyme in its normal cellular context.

The acyl-CoA specificity profile is more complex. Under the assay conditions employed, the hACAT expressed in yeast utilized a much broader range of fatty acids for esterification than either the yeast or the rat liver enzyme (Table IV). This may suggest that the enzyme, although functional, is in a slightly different membrane environment, such that the active site is accessible by CoAs containing acyl chains of different chain lengths and desaturation. Species and tissue differences cannot be ruled out, since in this study, the properties of human macrophage ACAT are compared to rat liver ACAT. In previous studies, DuP 128 inhibition and sterol substrate specificity were similar between liver or macrophage preparations from human or rat.3 The yeast enzymes appear to be very specific for C18 unsaturated fatty acids; this is in agreement with previous work (31, 32) but different to that found by Taylor (33) who saw no significant changes in in vivo esterification with different fatty acid substrates. The effect of linoleic acid on the ARE proteins is difficult to assess, since normally this fatty acid is not present in yeast. The fatty acid specificity of rat liver ACAT in our study is similar to that observed previously with the exception of linoleic acid. Previous studies (19, 34), found an esterification rate for linoleoyl-CoA between 15 and 40%, the rate of oleate, while in our experiments they were equivalent. There are several possible explanations for the observed differences. The specific activity of ACAT in the earlier experiments was about 10-fold less than under present conditions and the corresponding assay times were much longer; 2.5 min versus 30-60 min previously. The specificity of steryl ester hydrolase could play a role over the longer assay period. This longer assay time could also affect the amount of fatty acid being incorporated into phospholipid, where linoleate was much preferred to oleate (19). In those experiments, the ratio of linoleate/oleate in sterol ester was low (0.15), however, the ratio in phospholipid was high (3.4) suggesting a preference for linoleate incorporation into phospholipid under these assay conditions. Furthermore, in the previous experiments, radiolabeled cholesterol was added as a tracer in acetone, while in our experiments, the cholesterol was equilibrated with microsomes using the detergent Triton WR-1339. The non-ionic detergent may facilitate the interaction of linoleoyl-CoA with the microsomal ACAT. The predominant mammalian hepatic sterol ester which reflects ACAT activity is cholesteryl oleate, but again this may be due to normally low concentrations of the essential 18:2 fatty acid or to alternate metabolism. In this regard, when a diet rich in linoleate was fed to African Green monkeys, the amount of hepatic cholesteryl linoleate increased by 3.3-fold (35).

The demonstration of distinct substrate specificities of the human reaction is an important observation. The relative occurrences of these substrates in different tissues and in different species will reflect both physiological and nutritional influences and is probably variable. The presence of multiple ACAT isoforms with substrate specificity or differential tissue-specific expression would confer greater flexibility to this critical homeostatic process, which could be considered in some organs to be a detoxification process. It is noteworthy that the human macrophage ACAT mRNA is most abundant in adrenal tissues but barely detectable in liver and intestine, and yet these latter tissues exhibit exceptionally high ACAT activity (36). Of interest, we have recently identified other ACAT related gene products in the data base of expressed sequence tags (1), which may be candidates for isoforms that mediate sterol esterification in specific tissues or cell types, possibly with alternate substrate specificities. The study of these isoforms in the yeast are mutant background is currently being performed in this laboratory.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid/Investigatorship from the American Heart Association (NYC Affiliate) and by the Ara Parseghian Medical Research Foundation. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
   Present address: Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029.
**   To whom correspondence should be addressed: Institute of Human Nutrition, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 650 West 168th St., New York, NY 10032. Tel.: 212-305-6304; Fax: 212-305-3079; E-mail: sls37{at}columbia.edu.
1    The abbreviation used is: ACAT, acyl-CoA:cholesterol O-acyltransferase.
2    These genes were subsequently named SAT2 and SAT1, respectively (21). For clarity, the Stanford Saccharomyces Genome Database has decided that the ARE acronym should be utilized hereon.
3    J. T. Billheimer, unpublished data.

Acknowledgments

We thank J. J. Rich for a critical reading of the manuscript and Richard Deckelbaum and Peter Gillies for support and encouragement. We are grateful to Dr. T-Y. Chang for provision of the DM10 antisera and Scott Schissel and Ira Tabas for the gift of mouse adrenal protein preparations.


REFERENCES

  1. Yang, H., Bard, M., Bruner, D. A., Gleeson, A., Deckelbaum, R. J., Aljinovic, G., Pohl, T., Rothstein, R., and Sturley, S. L. (1996) Science 272, 1353-1356 [Abstract]
  2. Bloch, K. E. (1983) CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem. 14, 47-92 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Chang, T. Y., Chang, C. C. Y., and Cadigan, K. M. (1994) Trends Cadiovasc. Med. 4, 223-230 [CrossRef]
  4. Suckling, K. E., and Stange, E. F. (1985) J. Lipid Res. 26, 647-670 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Field, F. J., Kam, N. T., and Mathur, S. N. (1990) Gastroenterology 99, 539-551 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Huff, M. W., Telford, D. E., Barrett, P. H. R., Billheimer, J. T., and Gillies, P. J. (1994) Arterioscler. Thromb. 14, 1498-1508 [Abstract]
  7. Ross, R. (1993) Nature 362, 801-809 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Brown, M. S., and Goldstein, J. L. (1983) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 52, 223-261 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Billheimer, J., and Wilde, R. (1991) in Anti-atherosclerotic Agents Current Patents Ltd. (Tarr, I. J., ed), pp. B5-B19, Current Patents Ltd., London, United Kingdom
  10. Sliskovic, D. R., and White, A. D. (1991) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 12, 194-199 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Hainer, J. W., Terry, J., Connell, B., Zyruk, H., Jenkins, R., Shand, D., Gillies, P., Livak, K., Hunt, T., and Crouse, J. (1994) Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 56, 65-74 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Nakaya, N., Nakamichi, N., Sekino, H., Nomura, M., Ishii, M., Tomono, Y., and Yamato, C. (1994) Atherosclerosis 109, 253
  13. Yukawa, S. (1986) Gendai Iryo 18, 2837-2841
  14. Ross, A. C., Go, K. J., Heider, J. G., and Rothblatt, G. H. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 815-819 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. 184, A94, Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The NetherlandsBillheimer, J. T., Cromley, D., Higley, C., Wexler, R., Robinson, C., and Gillies, P. (1991) Ninth International Symposium on Atherosclerosis October, 1993, 184, A94, Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  16. Higley, C., Wilde, R., Maduskuie, T., Johnson, A., Pennev, P., Billheimer, J., Robinson, C., Gillies, P., and Wexler, R. (1994) J. Med. Chem. 37, 3511-3522 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Billheimer, J. T., and Gillies, P. J. (1992) in Advances in Cholesterol Research (Esfahani, M., and Swaney, J. B., eds), Telford Press, Philadelphia, PA
  18. Tavani, D., Nes, W., and Billheimer, J. (1982) J. Lipid Res. 23, 774-781 [Abstract]
  19. Goodman, D. S., Deykin, D., and Shiratori, T. (1964) J. Biol. Chem. 239, 1335-1345 [Free Full Text]
  20. Chang, C. C. Y., Huh, H. Y., Cadigan, K. M., and Chang, T. Y. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 20747-20755 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Yu, C., Kennedy, N. J., Chang, C. C. Y., and Rothblatt, J. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 24157-24163 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Ito, H., Fukuda, Y., Murata, K., and Kimura, A. (1983) J. Bacteriol. 153, 163-168 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A., and Struhl, K. (1987) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Vol. 1, John Wiley & Sons, New York
  24. Sherman, F., and Hicks, J. (1991) Methods Enzymol. 194, 21-37 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Wang, H., Germain, S. J., Benfield, P. P., and Gillies, P. J. (1996) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 16, 809-814 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Chang, C. C. Y., Chen, J., Thomas, M. A., Cheng, D., Del Priore, V. A., Newton, R. S., Pape, M. E., and Chang, T.-Y. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 29532-29540 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J. (1951) J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265-275 [Free Full Text]
  29. Billheimer, J. T., Tavani, D., and Nes, W. R. (1981) Anal. Biochem. 111, 331-335 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Cheng, D., Chang, C. C. Y., Qu, X., and Chang, T.-Y. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 685-695 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Taketani, S., Nagai, J., and Katsuki, H. (1978) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 528, 416-423 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Maydastha, P., and Parks, L. (1969) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 176, 858-862 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Taylor, F. R., and Parks, L. W. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 13048-13054 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Sgoutas, D. (1970) Biochemistry 9, 1826-1833 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Carr, T. P., Parks, J. S., and Rudel, L. L. (1992) Arterioscler. Thromb. 12, 1275-1283
  36. Uelman, P. J., Oka, K., Sullivan, M., Chang, C. C. Y., Chang, T. Y., and Chan, L. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 26192-26201 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.