(Received for publication, June 7, 1996, and in revised form, December 5, 1996)
From the Geneva Biomedical Research Institute,
Geneva, Switzerland, § Glaxo Wellcome Inc., Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, and the ¶ Department of
Biochemistry, Sciences II, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
SCG10 is a neuronal growth-associated protein
that is concentrated in the growth cones of developing neurons. SCG10
shows a high degree of sequence homology to the ubiquitous
phosphoprotein stathmin, which has been recently identified as a factor
that destabilizes microtubules by increasing their catastrophe rate. Whereas stathmin is a soluble cytosolic protein, SCG10 is
membrane-associated, indicating that the protein acts in a distinct
subcellular compartment. Identifying the precise intracellular
distribution of SCG10 as well as the mechanisms responsible for its
specific targeting will contribute to elucidating its function. The
main structural feature distinguishing the two proteins is that SCG10
contains an NH2-terminal extension of 34 amino acids. In
this study, we have examined the intracellular distribution of SCG10 in
PC12 cells and in transfected COS-7 cells and the role of the
NH2-terminal domain in membrane-binding and intracellular
targeting. SCG10 was found to be localized to the Golgi complex region.
We show that the NH2-terminal region (residues 1-34) was
necessary for membrane targeting and Golgi localization. Fusion
proteins consisting of the NH2-terminal 34 amino acids of
SCG10 and the related protein stathmin or the unrelated protein,
-galactosidase, accumulated in the Golgi, demonstrating that this
sequence was sufficient for Golgi localization. Biosynthetic labeling
of transfected COS-7 cells with [3H]palmitic acid
revealed that two cysteine residues contained within the
NH2-terminal domain were sites of palmitoylation.
The neuronal growth-associated protein SCG10 belongs to the same gene family as stathmin, a ubiquitous phosphoprotein. In contrast to stathmin, which is a highly soluble cytosolic protein (1), SCG10 is associated with cellular membranes (2). SCG10 was first identified as a gene expressed in sympathetic neurons but not in chromaffin cells (3). The expression of SCG10 is high in the developing nervous system (2), and its mRNA is nerve growth factor-inducible in PC12 cells (4). The SCG10 protein is localized to the perinuclear cytoplasm and enriched in growth cones of developing neurons in culture (2). SCG10 shares 74% amino acid identity with stathmin (5), which has been implicated in signal transduction mechanisms due to its phosphorylation in response to extracellular stimuli regulating proliferation and differentiation in different cell types (Ref. 1; for review see Ref. 6). In cells of the immune system, a role for the control of cell cycle has been proposed (7-9). We have previously found that in PC12 cells, stathmin is required for neuronal differentiation in response to nerve growth factor (NGF)1 (10). More recently, it has been reported that stathmin increases the catastrophe rate of microtubules, suggesting that it is a regulator of microtubule dynamics (11). We have observed a similar function for SCG10 in regulating the dynamic instability of microtubules during neurite outgrowth (12). However, SCG10 may act in specific subcellular compartments to which it is targeted via its membrane association.
In this study, we have defined the intracellular localization of SCG10
in PC12 cells and transfected COS-7 cells as the area of the Golgi
complex. In addition, we have studied the mechanism responsible for the
membrane binding and targeting of SCG10 to this area. Because the
structural difference between stathmin and SCG10 lies in the
NH2-terminal region of SCG10, we generated several
constructs encoding truncated and chimeric proteins for the
transfection of COS-7 cells. We demonstrate that the
NH2-terminal region of SCG10 contains a signal required for
its targeting to the area of the Golgi complex and sufficient to target
stathmin as well as the unrelated protein, -galactosidase, to this
subcellular region. Furthermore, the presence of two cysteines within
the NH2 terminus of SCG10, a potential locus for
palmitoylation, prompted us to investigate thio-acylation as a possible
lipid modification for the membrane localization of SCG10.
The rabbit antiserum
raised against the NH2-terminal amino acids 15-27 of
stathmin has been previously described (13) (gift of Dr. A. Sobel,
Paris, France). For SCG10, a rabbit antiserum and mouse mAbs were
raised against a fusion protein containing the entire rat coding
sequence fused to the bacterial TrpE protein (14). The rabbit antiserum
was further purified by sequential absorption on a protein A-Sepharose
column followed by affinity chromatography on a glutathione
S-transferase-stathmin-Affi-Gel-10 column to eliminate
antibodies cross-reacting with stathmin. The mouse mAbs were purified
on a spectra/gel Fast IgG column (Spectrum) and by gel filtration on
Superdex200 (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden). The following antibodies were
generous gifts: mouse mAbs against the KT3 tag (15) and the Glu-Glu tag
(16) (both from Dr. G. Walter, San Diego, CA). The following reagents
were obtained from commercial sources: mouse mAbs directed against
-galactosidase (Promega, Madison, WI),
-adaptin, FITC-conjugated
wheat germ agglutinin (Sigma, Buchs, Switzerland), and mouse mAbs
against
-mannosidase II (BAbCO, Berkeley, CA).
Standard DNA
procedures were performed according to Sambrook et al. (17).
The human stathmin cDNA and the rat SCG10 cDNA were generous
gift of Dr. A. Sobel (Paris, France) and Dr. N. Mori (Kyoto, Japan),
respectively. The coding sequences of both stathmin and SCG10 were
amplified by PCR using primers containing BamHI and
XbaI extensions and then subcloned into the pcDNA3
vector (Invitrogen) at the corresponding sites for expression in COS-7 cells. A NH2-terminal truncated SCG10 construct NSCG10
was generated by PCR starting from amino acid 35. A chimeric construct
SCG-GAL containing the NH2-terminal region of SCG10 (amino
acid 1-34) fused to the
-galactosidase polypeptide (amino acid
8-1001) was generated by PCR and in-frame ligation. A chimeric
construct SCG-STAT containing the same NH2-terminal domain
of SCG10 (amino acid 1-34) fused to the stathmin polypeptide (amino
acid 3-150) was generated similarly. For experiments where exogenous
expression had to be distinguished from endogenous expression in COS-7
cells, stathmin and SCG-STAT were epitope-tagged at the COOH terminus
with a KT3 tag (TPPPEPET; Ref. 18) or a Glu-Glu tag (EYMPME; Ref. 19) using PCR. Site-directed mutagenesis to replace cysteines with alanines
at positions 22 and 24 of SCG10 sequence was performed according to PCR
procedures previously described (20). All constructs were confirmed by
DNA sequencing.
PC12 cells were cultured as described previously (21). Cultures for immunofluorescence were plated on coverslips coated with poly-D-lysine and laminin (Collaborative Biomedical Products). COS-7 cells were grown in a humidified 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2 in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. Transient transfections were performed with the Bio-Rad electroporation system using 260 V and 960 microfarad. 15 µg of DNA were used for each transfection in electroporation buffer (150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.4) at a cell density of 107/ml. After electroporation, the cells were plated on glass coverslips precoated with 1 mg/ml polyethyleneimine (Sigma) in 0.03 M borate buffer, pH 8.3, for immunofluorescent studies or on 100-mm Petri dishes for biochemical procedures. In some experiments, cells were treated with 10 µM nocodazole (Sigma) for 2 h and processed for immunocytochemistry.
ImmunofluorescenceCultures were fixed in 4% formaldehyde in sulfate buffer (90 mM Na2SO4, 30 mM K2SO4, 5.8 mM MgCl2, 0.25 mM CaCl2, 1.0 mM NaH2PO4, pH 7.4) for 20 min and then rinsed with MTBS (66 mM NaCl, 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4). Cells were incubated with primary antibodies diluted in MTBS containing 10% rat serum, 0.3% Triton X-100, 2% bovine serum albumin overnight at 4 °C. After rinsing in MTBS, cells were incubated with either fluorescein- or Texas Red-conjugated goat anti-mouse or goat anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (Vector, Peterborough, UK) for 30 min at room temperature. Wheat germ agglutinin was used at 2.5 µg/ml concomitantly with secondary antibodies. Cultures were rinsed in MTBS and mounted using Vectashield mounting medium (Vector).
Metabolic Labeling with [3H]Palmitate and [3H]MyristateCOS-7 cells were transiently transfected with Glu-Glu-tagged wild-type and mutated SCG10 constructs where cysteines 22 and 24 were individually or concomitantly substituted with alanines. 48 h after electroporation, cells were collected from 100-mm dishes, rinsed twice with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and labeled for 4 h at 37 °C in 2 ml of serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 800 µCi of [3H]palmitate or [3H]myristate (DuPont NEN). Cells were then pelleted, rinsed twice in ice-cold PBS, and lysed in 400 µl of immunoprecipitation buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 10 mM NaF) supplemented with a mixture of proteases inhibitors (complete tablet, Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany). SCG10 was then immunoprecipitated for 3 h at 4 °C with constant rotation using 50 µg/ml anti-GluGlu mouse mAbs. 30 µl of 50% protein A-Sepharose/PBS (Pharmacia) were then added to the immunoprecipitation buffer, and samples were rotated for 1 h at 4 °C. Beads were washed twice with immunoprecipitation buffer, and proteins were eluted for 5 min at 95 °C in 50 µl of sample buffer. Proteins were then electrophoresed in duplicates on 8-16% SDS-PAGE. The gels were processed either for 3H fluorography or for anti-SCG10 immunoblotting.
Subcellular Fractionation and ImmunoblottingTransiently
transfected COS-7 cells were allowed to grow for 48 h after
electroporation. For the continuous sucrose gradient, four 10-cm
diameter Petri dishes were used. The confluent monolayers were washed
twice with PBS at 4 °C, scraped in 2.5 ml of PBS, and centrifuged
for 5 min at 1000 rpm in a Heraeus 1.0 R megafuge at 4 °C. After
rinsing the cells in 2.5 ml of homogenization buffer (0.25 M sucrose, 3 mM imidazole, pH 7.4), the cell
pellet was recentrifuged for 10 min at 2000 rpm at 4 °C. The cells
were then resuspended in 0.4 ml of homogenization buffer and harvested
by seven passages through a 22G 1 1/4 needle fitted on a 1-ml
plastic syringe. The homogenate was centrifuged for 10 min at 2000 rpm at 4 °C, and the post-nuclear supernatant was collected (1 mg of
total protein in 0.4 ml) and layered on a 4-ml continuous sucrose gradient poured from 45% (1.58 M) and 11.5% (0.35 M) sucrose solutions containing 3 mM imidazole,
pH 7.4. The gradient was centrifuged for 17 h at 35000 rpm at
4 °C in a Beckman L8-80 ultracentrifuge using a SW60 rotor. Eight
fractions of about 0.5 ml each were collected from the bottom using a
peristaltic pump at low flow, and sucrose concentration was determined
by refractometry. Samples were precipitated in 15-µg aliquots
according to Wessel and Flügge (22) and resuspended in sample
buffer. For the cytosol membranes preparation, transiently transfected
COS-7 cells were collected 48 h after electroporation and pelleted
at 2000 × g for 5 min. The cells were then harvested
by sonication in ice-cold homogenization buffer (10 mM
Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.5, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM benzamidine) and
centrifuged at 4000 × g for 2 min to remove nuclei and
unbroken cells. Cytosol and membranes were prepared by centrifugation
of the supernatants at 58,000 rpm (150,000 × g) for 40 min at 4 °C in a TL100.2 rotor (Beckman Instruments). The pellets
were washed three times and then resuspended to the same volume of
homogenization buffer as the cytosol fraction. The samples were
analyzed by SDS 8-16% PAGE and immunoblotted. Following
electrophoretic transfer to nitrocellulose, immunoblots were immersed
in blocking solution consisting of 5% milk powder in PBS/0.15% Tween
20. Blots were subsequently incubated with primary antibodies diluted
in 2.5% milk powder in PBS, and the signals were detected using the
ECL Western blotting kit (Amersham International, Buckinghamshire,
UK).
We generated a specific antiserum and
mAbs against SCG10 to compare the subcellular localization of stathmin
and SCG10 in PC12 cells and in transfected COS-7 cells. For stathmin,
we obtained a rabbit antiserum from A. Sobel (INSERM, Paris). The
specificity of the stathmin and SCG10 antibodies was tested on
immunoblots where the stathmin antiserum specifically recognized
bacterially produced rat stathmin and not SCG10 and the purified SCG10
antiserum as well as the mAb labeled specifically recombinant SCG10 and not stathmin (data not shown). When COS-7 cells were transfected by
electroporation with a construct encoding stathmin, no staining was
observed with the SCG10 antiserum in cells that highly expressed stathmin (Fig. 1, A and B). Both,
purified SCG10 antiserum and mAbs gave indistinguishable staining
patterns in transfected COS-7 cells (Fig. 1, C and
D) and in PC12 cells (Fig. 2). Double
immunostaining of PC12 cells demonstrated that stathmin was
homogenously distributed in the cytoplasm as expected for a soluble
protein (Fig. 2A). In contrast, the SCG10 mAbs recognized
punctate structures in the perinuclear region (Fig. 2B). To
investigate the nature of the punctate structures, we performed double
stainings of PC12 cells with two markers of the Golgi complex:
-mannosidase II, a glycoprotein enriched in the
cis/medial Golgi region (23) and wheat germ agglutinin
(WGA), a lectin that binds to N-acetylglucosamine and
N-acetylneuraminic acid residues found predominantly in the trans Golgi apparatus/network (24) (Fig. 2,
C-F). SCG10 immunoreactivity colocalized with both markers,
indicating that SCG10 is localized in the area of the Golgi
complex.
To determine whether the subcellular localization of SCG10 in the Golgi
complex region is mediated by an intrinsic feature of the structure of
SCG10, we transiently transfected COS-7 cells with both stathmin and
SCG10 expression constructs (Fig. 3). To distinguish
transfected stathmin from stathmin that was endogenously expressed at
low levels in COS-7 cells, at the 3 end of the stathmin cDNA, we
added a fragment encoding the 6-amino acid epitope "Glu-Glu" (EYMPME; Ref. 19) or the KT3 epitope (TPPPEPET; Ref. 18), which are
recognized by specific mAbs (15, 16). No SCG10 immunoreactivity was
observed in wild-type COS-7 cells stained with the SCG10 antiserum (Fig. 1B). Immunofluorescence staining of transfected COS-7
cells revealed distinct distribution patterns of stathmin and SCG10 as
observed in the PC12 cells. Unlike stathmin, which was diffusely distributed throughout the cytoplasm (Fig. 1A), SCG10 was
highly concentrated in the region of the Golgi complex as shown by its colocalization with WGA and another marker of the trans
Golgi compartment,
-adaptin (25) (Fig. 4). SCG10
staining remained similar to that of WGA (Fig. 5,
A and B) or
-adaptin (Fig. 5, C and
D) following disruption of the Golgi organization with the microtubule-depolymerizing drug nocodazole (26). Although most of the
structures were labeled with both SCG10 and the Golgi markers, a
significant proportion showed a staining for SCG10 but not for the
Golgi markers and conversely (Fig. 5, A-D). In PC12 cells, SCG10 remained colocalized with
-mannosidase II following nocodazole treatment, whereas brefeldin A (20 µg/ml, 20 min), which induces a
breakdown of the Golgi stacks and a redistribution of resident Golgi
proteins into the endoplasmic reticulum (27, 28), caused SCG10 and
-mannosidase II stainings to disappear (data not shown).
SCG10 Cofractionates with the Golgi Marker
In order to further characterize the
association of SCG10 with the Golgi apparatus, we employed a cell
fractionation procedure based on a sucrose density gradient.
Post-nuclear supernatants from transfected COS-7 cells were centrifuged
on a continuous sucrose gradient ranging linearly from 37 to 12%
(w/w), and fractions were analyzed by immunoblotting. SCG10 was
enriched in heavy fractions, particularly in fractions 3 and 4 (32-28%), but significant amounts of the protein were detected in the
other fractions (Fig. 6). The Golgi marker -adaptin
showed a distribution comparable with that of SCG10 and was enriched in
fractions 3-5, consistent with our previous immunofluorescent studies
(Fig. 6). Total cellular proteins measured in each fraction show a
distinct distribution (Fig. 6). SCG10-enriched fractions were then
treated with high salt, nonionic detergent, and alkali in order to
determine the nature of the association with Golgi membranes.
Consistent with previous results obtained with SCG10-enriched smooth
microsomes (2), the protein was completely extracted with 1% Triton
X-100 but only partially with carbonate pH 11.4 (40-50%). No
significant extraction with high salts (1.5 M) was observed
(data not shown).
The NH2-terminal Region of SCG10 Is Necessary and Sufficient for Membrane Binding and Targeting to the Golgi Complex
SCG10 has a structural feature that is not present in
stathmin (amino acid 1-34, Fig. 3). This NH2-terminal
domain contains a stretch of hydrophobic amino acids, which has been
proposed to be responsible for membrane attachment of SCG10 (2). In order to address the question whether the differential localization of
stathmin and SCG10 is mediated by this NH2-terminal region, we generated several plasmid constructs expressing both deletion and
fusion proteins (Fig. 3). These were transfected into COS-7 cells and
analyzed by double immunofluorescence. When COS-7 cells were
transfected with a construct in which the NH2-terminal
region of rat SCG10 (amino acids 1-34) was deleted, the truncated
SCG10 molecule was found in the cytoplasm. The appearance was very
similar to stathmin expression (Fig. 7). Therefore,
removal of this domain led to a complete solubilization of the
remaining region. This indicates that the first 34 amino acids of SCG10
contain information required for association with the Golgi
complex.
When COS-7 cells were transfected with a construct in which the
NH2-terminal domain of SCG10 was fused in frame to
stathmin, the chimeric stathmin molecule, just like SCG10, was
concentrated in the region of the Golgi complex as revealed by
colocalization with the Golgi marker WGA (Fig. 8). This
finding suggests that the NH2-terminal domain of SCG10
contains information sufficient to target the otherwise cytosolic
stathmin to this intracellular compartment. To further define the
mechanism responsible for intracellular targeting of SCG10, we
transfected COS-7 cells with a construct in which the
NH2-terminal domain of SCG10 was fused to an unrelated protein, -galactosidase. Although
-galactosidase had a diffuse cytosolic localization, the SCG10 (1-34)/
-galactosidase fusion protein was concentrated in the region of the Golgi complex (Fig. 9).
In addition to the immunofluorescence analysis, we studied the membrane
binding properties of the deletion and fusion proteins. The
distribution of the proteins in the cytosolic and total membrane fractions from transiently transfected COS-7 cells was detected by
Western blot analysis using anti-KT3 mAb (to detect stathmin expression), anti-SCG10, and anti--galactosidase antibodies. Stathmin and
-galactosidase were mainly found in the soluble fraction (Fig. 10, C), whereas SCG10 was located
predominantly in the particulate fraction (Fig. 10, M). In
contrast,
NSCG10 was predominantly in the soluble fraction and
SCG-GAL and SCG-STAT, in which the NH2-terminal domain of
SCG10 was fused to
-galactosidase or stathmin, respectively, were in
the particulate fraction (Fig. 10). This
subfractionation analysis indicates that the NH2-terminal 34 amino acids of SCG10 contain enough information for membrane association.
The NH2-terminal Domain of SCG10 Contains Two Cysteines That Are Sites for Palmitoylation
Cysteines have been shown to be
targets for post-translational modification, mainly palmitoylation, in
other neuronal proteins concentrated in axons and nerve terminals, such
as GAP-43 and SNAP-25 (29, 30). Also SCG10 contains two closely spaced
cysteine residues within the NH2-terminal region, at
positions 22 and 24 (Fig. 3), which may represent sites for
palmitoylation. To study whether SCG10 was palmitoylated, COS-7 cells
were transfected with Glu-Glu epitope-tagged SCG10 and incubated with
[3H]palmitic acid or [3H]myristic acid for
4 h. SCG10 was isolated by immunoprecipitation using anti-Glu-Glu
mAbs and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and fluorography. To compare the
expression levels of SCG10, the immunoprecipitates were analyzed by
Western blotting using the SCG10 antiserum. As a control,
nontransfected cells were also labeled, immunoprecipitated, and
subjected to electrophoresis. The incorporation of tritium into SCG10
was detected from [3H]palmitic acid but not from
[3H]myristic acid (Fig. 11, left
panel). Then both cysteines (22 and 24) were mutated to alanines
to determine if they were involved in the palmitoylation of SCG10. The
single and double mutants and wild-type SCG10 were expressed in COS-7
cells, and the cells were labeled with [3H]palmitic acid.
The absence of radioactivity in SCG10 in which both cysteines have been
mutated suggests that the attachment of palmitic acid to SCG10 occurs
through thioester linkage to cysteines (Fig. 11, right
panel). In agreement with these data, hydroxylamine treatment,
which is known to hydrolyze thioester at pH 7 (31), released the
radioactivity associated with SCG10 (data not shown). We found that the
Cys22 mutant (Fig. 11, A22) incorporated a much
higher amount of radioactivity than the Cys24 mutant (Fig.
11, A24), indicating that Cys24 is the major
site for palmitoylation (Fig. 11).
Palmitoylation Contributes to the Membrane Attachment and Targeting of SCG10 to the Golgi Complex
To assess whether palmitic acid is
involved in the membrane anchoring of SCG10, we analyzed whether
replacing the two cysteines would affect the membrane binding ability
of SCG10. We transiently transfected COS-7 cells with constructs in
which Cys22, Cys24, or both were replaced by
alanine residues. Double immunofluorescence analysis revealed that the
mutated proteins did not colocalize with the Golgi marker protein
-adaptin but showed a more cytosolic distribution as compared with
the wild type (Fig. 12). In some cells, however,
localization to the Golgi complex appeared to be retained when
Cys22 was mutated (Fig. 12C). As shown in Fig.
13, in all three cases, the mutations caused only
partial solubilization of the protein, whereas removal of the entire
NH2-terminal domain led to nearly complete solubilization.
In all subfractionation analysis by Western blot, we defined the
cytosol and membrane contamination contributing the signal of membrane
or cytosol fraction, respectively, by using stathmin as a cytosol
marker and
-adaptin as a membrane marker. In both cases, we found
8% (± 3%) contamination (not shown).
In this study, we have investigated the molecular mechanism responsible for the membrane targeting of the neurospecific protein SCG10, which is closely related to the ubiquitous soluble protein stathmin. Analysis of the subcellular localization in PC12 cells and transfected COS-7 cells indicated that SCG10 colocalized with the region of the Golgi complex and that both specific structural elements and palmitoylation within the NH2-terminal region were responsible for membrane association and localization in this area.
For these studies, we used existing antibodies for stathmin and generated polyclonal and mAbs for SCG10, all three of which were highly specific in Western blots and immunofluorescence. Because native PC12 cells contain only barely detectable levels of SCG10 (data not shown), for these experiments, PC12 cells were treated with NGF for 24 h. It was known from previous results that SCG10 is up-regulated in response to NGF in this cell line (4). NGF-stimulated PC12 cells showed strong immunoreactivity for both stathmin and SCG10, but the subcellular distribution of these two very similar proteins was strikingly different. Whereas stathmin immunoreactivity was cytosolic as expected for a soluble protein (1), SCG10 accumulated in the perinuclear region. This is in agreement with previous studies that have shown a punctate SCG10 staining of the perinuclear cytoplasm in neuronal cell bodies (2). Here, we have further defined the localization of SCG10 to the area of the Golgi complex.
Both endogenous protein in NGF-induced PC12 cells and exogenous protein
in transfected COS-7 cells colocalized with markers for the Golgi
compartment, including -mannosidase II,
-adaptin, and the lectin
WGA (Figs. 2 and 4). SCG10 immunoreactivity was sensitive to the
Golgi-disrupting agent brefeldin A (data not shown) and remained
associated to a large extent, although not completely, with the Golgi
markers following perturbation of Golgi organization with nocodazole
(Fig. 5). Consistent with colocalization studies, SCG10 largely
cofractionated with
-adaptin following subcellular fractionation of
transfected COS-7 cells on a sucrose density gradient. Altogether,
these results strongly suggest that SCG10 is associated with the Golgi
apparatus, although further electron microscope-based analysis will be
required to determine the precise location in the Golgi
compartment.
SCG10 was described as a membrane-associated but not an integral
membrane protein, whose association with smooth microsomal membranes
was efficiently disrupted with nonionic detergent but only partially
with alkali (2). Structural features of the SCG10 protein sequence led
to the speculation that a short stretch of hydrophobic amino acids
within the NH2-terminal domain of SCG10 (and not conserved
in stathmin) might mediate membrane interaction (2). We examined this
possibility by separate expression of stathmin, SCG10, a
NH2-terminal deleted SCG10, and SCG10-stathmin and
SCG10--galactosidase fusion proteins in transfected cells. Our
results indicate that specific signals within the
NH2-terminal 34 amino-acids of SCG10 are required not only
for membrane binding but also for its targeting to the area of the
Golgi complex. Moreover, we showed that the NH2-terminal
domain is sufficient to target heterologous proteins to the same
region. The results of immunofluorescence were always consistent with
results obtained from crude subcellular fractionation. Because these
experiments were performed in transfected COS-7 cells, the mechanism
through which the NH2-terminal region of SCG10 targets the
protein to this subcellular region is not neuron-specific.
In the case of other nerve terminal proteins, GAP-43 and SNAP-25, fatty acylation (palmitoylation) on cysteine residues was shown to mediate membrane association (29, 30, 32). SCG10 also contains two cysteines within the NH2-terminal region. Therefore, we investigated whether SCG10 was palmitoylated on these cysteines and whether palmitoylation may be the mechanism responsible for the membrane targeting. Indeed, both cysteines 22 and 24 were found to be palmitoylated in transfected COS-7 cells, but Cys24 was palmitoylated to a higher extent. Interestingly, the Cys22 mutant was more labeled than the wild-type protein. Because the mutant SCG10 proteins showed less degradation products in the Western blots, this may indicate that the wild-type protein is more susceptible to proteolytic cleavage that may remove the radioactivity. Furthermore, replacement of Cys22 or Cys24 or both by alanine caused a cytosolic distribution of a large proportion of the protein. These data suggest an important role of cysteine residues in the membrane targeting of SCG10.
However, because mutation of the cysteines did not result in complete solubilization of SCG10, in addition to palmitoylation other signals contained within the NH2-terminal domain must be responsible for the membrane distribution and targeting of this protein. A similar finding was obtained for glutamic acid decarboxylase, which exists in two major isoforms, one of which is palmitoylated and Golgi complex-associated. The targeting of this isoform does not depend on palmitoylation but on a signal within the NH2-terminal 27 amino acids of the protein (33). However, the NH2-terminal regions of SCG10 and glutamic acid decarboxylase do not share sequence similarity. Thus, the precise mechanism by which the NH2-terminal domain of SCG10 targets the protein to the subcellular compartments remains to be established. Interestingly, basic amino acids in the NH2 terminus of Src, which is myristoylated, have been involved in membrane binding through electrostatic interaction with acidic phospholipids (34). The presence of five basic amino acids (four lysines and one arginine) in the first 34 NH2-terminal amino acids of SCG10 (Fig. 3) suggest that a similar mechanism may be involved. Future transfection experiments of SCG10 constructs in neurons may elucidate whether the same signals that target SCG10 to the Golgi complex region mediate the targeting to the growth cones or whether additional signals or an interaction with other proteins are required for growth cone targeting.
The SCG10-related protein stathmin was shown to destabilize microtubules by increasing their catastrophe rate (transition from a growing to a shrinking state) (11). Our recent studies have identified a similar role for SCG10 as a mediator of neurite outgrowth through regulation of microtubule dynamics (12). Owing to its membrane association, SCG10 is likely to function in specific subcellular compartments, including Golgi and neuronal growth cones. The dynamic interaction between intracellular organelles and microtubules may specifically require proteins, like SCG10, acting as microtubule-disrupting factors to regulate trafficking events. Alternatively, SCG10 might use the sorting machinery to access to neuronal growth cones, regulating neurite outgrowth-associated events via its action on microtubules dynamics.
We thank Jonathan Knowles and all of the members of the neurobiology group at the Geneva Biomedical Research Institute for helpful discussion. We are grateful to A. Sobel, who generously contributed the anti-stathmin antibody. We also thank A. Bernard, H. Blasey, J. Y. Bonnefoy, N. Gullu, C. Hebert, S. Herren, P. Graber, L. Potier, and E. Sebille for support at various stages of this work. We thank S. Arkinstall, M. Edgerton, and E. Merlo Pich for many helpful comments and critical reading of the manuscript. Finally, we acknowledge Jean Gruenberg and Manuel Rojo for excellent technical and intellectual support.