Targeting of SCG10 to the Area of the Golgi Complex Is Mediated by Its NH2-terminal Region*

(Received for publication, June 7, 1996, and in revised form, December 5, 1996)

Gilbert Di Paolo Dagger , Robert Lutjens Dagger , Véronique Pellier Dagger , Stephen A. Stimpson §, Marie-Hélène Beuchat , Stefan Catsicas Dagger and Gabriele Grenningloh Dagger par

From the Dagger  Geneva Biomedical Research Institute, Geneva, Switzerland, § Glaxo Wellcome Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, and the  Department of Biochemistry, Sciences II, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

SCG10 is a neuronal growth-associated protein that is concentrated in the growth cones of developing neurons. SCG10 shows a high degree of sequence homology to the ubiquitous phosphoprotein stathmin, which has been recently identified as a factor that destabilizes microtubules by increasing their catastrophe rate. Whereas stathmin is a soluble cytosolic protein, SCG10 is membrane-associated, indicating that the protein acts in a distinct subcellular compartment. Identifying the precise intracellular distribution of SCG10 as well as the mechanisms responsible for its specific targeting will contribute to elucidating its function. The main structural feature distinguishing the two proteins is that SCG10 contains an NH2-terminal extension of 34 amino acids. In this study, we have examined the intracellular distribution of SCG10 in PC12 cells and in transfected COS-7 cells and the role of the NH2-terminal domain in membrane-binding and intracellular targeting. SCG10 was found to be localized to the Golgi complex region. We show that the NH2-terminal region (residues 1-34) was necessary for membrane targeting and Golgi localization. Fusion proteins consisting of the NH2-terminal 34 amino acids of SCG10 and the related protein stathmin or the unrelated protein, beta -galactosidase, accumulated in the Golgi, demonstrating that this sequence was sufficient for Golgi localization. Biosynthetic labeling of transfected COS-7 cells with [3H]palmitic acid revealed that two cysteine residues contained within the NH2-terminal domain were sites of palmitoylation.


INTRODUCTION

The neuronal growth-associated protein SCG10 belongs to the same gene family as stathmin, a ubiquitous phosphoprotein. In contrast to stathmin, which is a highly soluble cytosolic protein (1), SCG10 is associated with cellular membranes (2). SCG10 was first identified as a gene expressed in sympathetic neurons but not in chromaffin cells (3). The expression of SCG10 is high in the developing nervous system (2), and its mRNA is nerve growth factor-inducible in PC12 cells (4). The SCG10 protein is localized to the perinuclear cytoplasm and enriched in growth cones of developing neurons in culture (2). SCG10 shares 74% amino acid identity with stathmin (5), which has been implicated in signal transduction mechanisms due to its phosphorylation in response to extracellular stimuli regulating proliferation and differentiation in different cell types (Ref. 1; for review see Ref. 6). In cells of the immune system, a role for the control of cell cycle has been proposed (7-9). We have previously found that in PC12 cells, stathmin is required for neuronal differentiation in response to nerve growth factor (NGF)1 (10). More recently, it has been reported that stathmin increases the catastrophe rate of microtubules, suggesting that it is a regulator of microtubule dynamics (11). We have observed a similar function for SCG10 in regulating the dynamic instability of microtubules during neurite outgrowth (12). However, SCG10 may act in specific subcellular compartments to which it is targeted via its membrane association.

In this study, we have defined the intracellular localization of SCG10 in PC12 cells and transfected COS-7 cells as the area of the Golgi complex. In addition, we have studied the mechanism responsible for the membrane binding and targeting of SCG10 to this area. Because the structural difference between stathmin and SCG10 lies in the NH2-terminal region of SCG10, we generated several constructs encoding truncated and chimeric proteins for the transfection of COS-7 cells. We demonstrate that the NH2-terminal region of SCG10 contains a signal required for its targeting to the area of the Golgi complex and sufficient to target stathmin as well as the unrelated protein, beta -galactosidase, to this subcellular region. Furthermore, the presence of two cysteines within the NH2 terminus of SCG10, a potential locus for palmitoylation, prompted us to investigate thio-acylation as a possible lipid modification for the membrane localization of SCG10.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Antibodies and Cytochemical Probes

The rabbit antiserum raised against the NH2-terminal amino acids 15-27 of stathmin has been previously described (13) (gift of Dr. A. Sobel, Paris, France). For SCG10, a rabbit antiserum and mouse mAbs were raised against a fusion protein containing the entire rat coding sequence fused to the bacterial TrpE protein (14). The rabbit antiserum was further purified by sequential absorption on a protein A-Sepharose column followed by affinity chromatography on a glutathione S-transferase-stathmin-Affi-Gel-10 column to eliminate antibodies cross-reacting with stathmin. The mouse mAbs were purified on a spectra/gel Fast IgG column (Spectrum) and by gel filtration on Superdex200 (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden). The following antibodies were generous gifts: mouse mAbs against the KT3 tag (15) and the Glu-Glu tag (16) (both from Dr. G. Walter, San Diego, CA). The following reagents were obtained from commercial sources: mouse mAbs directed against beta -galactosidase (Promega, Madison, WI), gamma -adaptin, FITC-conjugated wheat germ agglutinin (Sigma, Buchs, Switzerland), and mouse mAbs against alpha -mannosidase II (BAbCO, Berkeley, CA).

Generation of Stathmin and SCG10 Constructs

Standard DNA procedures were performed according to Sambrook et al. (17). The human stathmin cDNA and the rat SCG10 cDNA were generous gift of Dr. A. Sobel (Paris, France) and Dr. N. Mori (Kyoto, Japan), respectively. The coding sequences of both stathmin and SCG10 were amplified by PCR using primers containing BamHI and XbaI extensions and then subcloned into the pcDNA3 vector (Invitrogen) at the corresponding sites for expression in COS-7 cells. A NH2-terminal truncated SCG10 construct Delta NSCG10 was generated by PCR starting from amino acid 35. A chimeric construct SCG-GAL containing the NH2-terminal region of SCG10 (amino acid 1-34) fused to the beta -galactosidase polypeptide (amino acid 8-1001) was generated by PCR and in-frame ligation. A chimeric construct SCG-STAT containing the same NH2-terminal domain of SCG10 (amino acid 1-34) fused to the stathmin polypeptide (amino acid 3-150) was generated similarly. For experiments where exogenous expression had to be distinguished from endogenous expression in COS-7 cells, stathmin and SCG-STAT were epitope-tagged at the COOH terminus with a KT3 tag (TPPPEPET; Ref. 18) or a Glu-Glu tag (EYMPME; Ref. 19) using PCR. Site-directed mutagenesis to replace cysteines with alanines at positions 22 and 24 of SCG10 sequence was performed according to PCR procedures previously described (20). All constructs were confirmed by DNA sequencing.

Cell Culture and Transfection

PC12 cells were cultured as described previously (21). Cultures for immunofluorescence were plated on coverslips coated with poly-D-lysine and laminin (Collaborative Biomedical Products). COS-7 cells were grown in a humidified 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2 in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. Transient transfections were performed with the Bio-Rad electroporation system using 260 V and 960 microfarad. 15 µg of DNA were used for each transfection in electroporation buffer (150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.4) at a cell density of 107/ml. After electroporation, the cells were plated on glass coverslips precoated with 1 mg/ml polyethyleneimine (Sigma) in 0.03 M borate buffer, pH 8.3, for immunofluorescent studies or on 100-mm Petri dishes for biochemical procedures. In some experiments, cells were treated with 10 µM nocodazole (Sigma) for 2 h and processed for immunocytochemistry.

Immunofluorescence

Cultures were fixed in 4% formaldehyde in sulfate buffer (90 mM Na2SO4, 30 mM K2SO4, 5.8 mM MgCl2, 0.25 mM CaCl2, 1.0 mM NaH2PO4, pH 7.4) for 20 min and then rinsed with MTBS (66 mM NaCl, 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4). Cells were incubated with primary antibodies diluted in MTBS containing 10% rat serum, 0.3% Triton X-100, 2% bovine serum albumin overnight at 4 °C. After rinsing in MTBS, cells were incubated with either fluorescein- or Texas Red-conjugated goat anti-mouse or goat anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (Vector, Peterborough, UK) for 30 min at room temperature. Wheat germ agglutinin was used at 2.5 µg/ml concomitantly with secondary antibodies. Cultures were rinsed in MTBS and mounted using Vectashield mounting medium (Vector).

Metabolic Labeling with [3H]Palmitate and [3H]Myristate

COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with Glu-Glu-tagged wild-type and mutated SCG10 constructs where cysteines 22 and 24 were individually or concomitantly substituted with alanines. 48 h after electroporation, cells were collected from 100-mm dishes, rinsed twice with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and labeled for 4 h at 37 °C in 2 ml of serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 800 µCi of [3H]palmitate or [3H]myristate (DuPont NEN). Cells were then pelleted, rinsed twice in ice-cold PBS, and lysed in 400 µl of immunoprecipitation buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 10 mM NaF) supplemented with a mixture of proteases inhibitors (complete tablet, Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany). SCG10 was then immunoprecipitated for 3 h at 4 °C with constant rotation using 50 µg/ml anti-GluGlu mouse mAbs. 30 µl of 50% protein A-Sepharose/PBS (Pharmacia) were then added to the immunoprecipitation buffer, and samples were rotated for 1 h at 4 °C. Beads were washed twice with immunoprecipitation buffer, and proteins were eluted for 5 min at 95 °C in 50 µl of sample buffer. Proteins were then electrophoresed in duplicates on 8-16% SDS-PAGE. The gels were processed either for 3H fluorography or for anti-SCG10 immunoblotting.

Subcellular Fractionation and Immunoblotting

Transiently transfected COS-7 cells were allowed to grow for 48 h after electroporation. For the continuous sucrose gradient, four 10-cm diameter Petri dishes were used. The confluent monolayers were washed twice with PBS at 4 °C, scraped in 2.5 ml of PBS, and centrifuged for 5 min at 1000 rpm in a Heraeus 1.0 R megafuge at 4 °C. After rinsing the cells in 2.5 ml of homogenization buffer (0.25 M sucrose, 3 mM imidazole, pH 7.4), the cell pellet was recentrifuged for 10 min at 2000 rpm at 4 °C. The cells were then resuspended in 0.4 ml of homogenization buffer and harvested by seven passages through a 22G 1 1/4 needle fitted on a 1-ml plastic syringe. The homogenate was centrifuged for 10 min at 2000 rpm at 4 °C, and the post-nuclear supernatant was collected (1 mg of total protein in 0.4 ml) and layered on a 4-ml continuous sucrose gradient poured from 45% (1.58 M) and 11.5% (0.35 M) sucrose solutions containing 3 mM imidazole, pH 7.4. The gradient was centrifuged for 17 h at 35'000 rpm at 4 °C in a Beckman L8-80 ultracentrifuge using a SW60 rotor. Eight fractions of about 0.5 ml each were collected from the bottom using a peristaltic pump at low flow, and sucrose concentration was determined by refractometry. Samples were precipitated in 15-µg aliquots according to Wessel and Flügge (22) and resuspended in sample buffer. For the cytosol membranes preparation, transiently transfected COS-7 cells were collected 48 h after electroporation and pelleted at 2000 × g for 5 min. The cells were then harvested by sonication in ice-cold homogenization buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.5, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM benzamidine) and centrifuged at 4000 × g for 2 min to remove nuclei and unbroken cells. Cytosol and membranes were prepared by centrifugation of the supernatants at 58,000 rpm (150,000 × g) for 40 min at 4 °C in a TL100.2 rotor (Beckman Instruments). The pellets were washed three times and then resuspended to the same volume of homogenization buffer as the cytosol fraction. The samples were analyzed by SDS 8-16% PAGE and immunoblotted. Following electrophoretic transfer to nitrocellulose, immunoblots were immersed in blocking solution consisting of 5% milk powder in PBS/0.15% Tween 20. Blots were subsequently incubated with primary antibodies diluted in 2.5% milk powder in PBS, and the signals were detected using the ECL Western blotting kit (Amersham International, Buckinghamshire, UK).


RESULTS

SCG10 Is Localized to the Area of the Golgi Complex in PC12 Cells and Transfected COS-7 Cells

We generated a specific antiserum and mAbs against SCG10 to compare the subcellular localization of stathmin and SCG10 in PC12 cells and in transfected COS-7 cells. For stathmin, we obtained a rabbit antiserum from A. Sobel (INSERM, Paris). The specificity of the stathmin and SCG10 antibodies was tested on immunoblots where the stathmin antiserum specifically recognized bacterially produced rat stathmin and not SCG10 and the purified SCG10 antiserum as well as the mAb labeled specifically recombinant SCG10 and not stathmin (data not shown). When COS-7 cells were transfected by electroporation with a construct encoding stathmin, no staining was observed with the SCG10 antiserum in cells that highly expressed stathmin (Fig. 1, A and B). Both, purified SCG10 antiserum and mAbs gave indistinguishable staining patterns in transfected COS-7 cells (Fig. 1, C and D) and in PC12 cells (Fig. 2). Double immunostaining of PC12 cells demonstrated that stathmin was homogenously distributed in the cytoplasm as expected for a soluble protein (Fig. 2A). In contrast, the SCG10 mAbs recognized punctate structures in the perinuclear region (Fig. 2B). To investigate the nature of the punctate structures, we performed double stainings of PC12 cells with two markers of the Golgi complex: alpha -mannosidase II, a glycoprotein enriched in the cis/medial Golgi region (23) and wheat germ agglutinin (WGA), a lectin that binds to N-acetylglucosamine and N-acetylneuraminic acid residues found predominantly in the trans Golgi apparatus/network (24) (Fig. 2, C-F). SCG10 immunoreactivity colocalized with both markers, indicating that SCG10 is localized in the area of the Golgi complex.


Fig. 1. Characterization of antiserum and mAbs directed to SCG10 by immunofluorescence. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with Glu-Glu epitope-tagged stathmin (A and B) and SCG10 (C and D) and double-stained with the mAbs anti-Glu-Glu (A) and rabbit antiserum directed to SCG10 (B). The rabbit antiserum does not cross-react with stathmin. Both rabbit polyclonal (C) and mouse mAbs (D) directed to SCG10 show the same immunoreactivity in a punctate region in proximity to the nucleus. Scale bar, 25 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (58K GIF file)]



Fig. 2. Localization of stathmin and SCG10 in PC12 cells. PC12 cells were treated with NGF for 24 h and double-stained with the rabbit antiserum directed to stathmin (A) and the mAb anti-SCG10 (B). The anti-SCG10 mAb does not cross-react with stathmin. Cells were stained with the rabbit serum anti-SCG10 (C and E) and counterstained with a mAb directed to the Golgi marker alpha -mannosidase II (D) and with FITC-coupled WGA (F). SCG10 colocalizes with the Golgi markers in PC12 cells (arrows). Scale bar, 7.5 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (64K GIF file)]


To determine whether the subcellular localization of SCG10 in the Golgi complex region is mediated by an intrinsic feature of the structure of SCG10, we transiently transfected COS-7 cells with both stathmin and SCG10 expression constructs (Fig. 3). To distinguish transfected stathmin from stathmin that was endogenously expressed at low levels in COS-7 cells, at the 3' end of the stathmin cDNA, we added a fragment encoding the 6-amino acid epitope "Glu-Glu" (EYMPME; Ref. 19) or the KT3 epitope (TPPPEPET; Ref. 18), which are recognized by specific mAbs (15, 16). No SCG10 immunoreactivity was observed in wild-type COS-7 cells stained with the SCG10 antiserum (Fig. 1B). Immunofluorescence staining of transfected COS-7 cells revealed distinct distribution patterns of stathmin and SCG10 as observed in the PC12 cells. Unlike stathmin, which was diffusely distributed throughout the cytoplasm (Fig. 1A), SCG10 was highly concentrated in the region of the Golgi complex as shown by its colocalization with WGA and another marker of the trans Golgi compartment, gamma -adaptin (25) (Fig. 4). SCG10 staining remained similar to that of WGA (Fig. 5, A and B) or gamma -adaptin (Fig. 5, C and D) following disruption of the Golgi organization with the microtubule-depolymerizing drug nocodazole (26). Although most of the structures were labeled with both SCG10 and the Golgi markers, a significant proportion showed a staining for SCG10 but not for the Golgi markers and conversely (Fig. 5, A-D). In PC12 cells, SCG10 remained colocalized with alpha -mannosidase II following nocodazole treatment, whereas brefeldin A (20 µg/ml, 20 min), which induces a breakdown of the Golgi stacks and a redistribution of resident Golgi proteins into the endoplasmic reticulum (27, 28), caused SCG10 and alpha -mannosidase II stainings to disappear (data not shown).


Fig. 3. Schematic representation of the NH2-terminal regions of SCG10 and stathmin and the constructs expressed in COS-7 cells. Top panel, sequence alignment of the NH2-terminal amino acids of SCG10 (amino acid 1-50) and stathmin (amino acid 1-16). Closed dots indicate the cysteines (22 and 24) contained in the NH2 terminus of SCG10, which have been replaced by an alanine. Bottom panel, diagram showing all the constructs investigated in this report. STAT, stathmin; Delta NSCG10, SCG10 where the first 34 amino acid have been deleted; GAL, beta -galactosidase.
[View Larger Version of this Image (20K GIF file)]



Fig. 4. Intracellular distribution of SCG10 in transiently transfected COS-7 cells. Cells were stained with the rabbit serum anti-SCG10 (A and C) and counterstained with a mAb directed to the Golgi marker gamma -adaptin (B) and with the FITC-coupled lectin WGA (D). SCG10 immunoreactivity colocalizes with the Golgi markers in transfected cells (arrows). Scale bar, 25 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (71K GIF file)]



Fig. 5. Effect of nocodazole on the intracellular distribution of SCG10 in transfected COS-7 cells. Following 2 h of treatment with 10 µM nocodazole, cells were stained with the rabbit serum anti-SCG10 (A and C) and counterstained with the FITC-coupled lectin WGA (B) and with a mAb directed to the Golgi marker gamma -adaptin (D). SCG10 immunoreactivity colocalizes to a large extent with the Golgi markers after disruption of Golgi apparatus organization with the drug (arrowheads). Scale bar, 25 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (106K GIF file)]


SCG10 Cofractionates with the Golgi Marker gamma -Adaptin in Transfected COS-7 Cells

In order to further characterize the association of SCG10 with the Golgi apparatus, we employed a cell fractionation procedure based on a sucrose density gradient. Post-nuclear supernatants from transfected COS-7 cells were centrifuged on a continuous sucrose gradient ranging linearly from 37 to 12% (w/w), and fractions were analyzed by immunoblotting. SCG10 was enriched in heavy fractions, particularly in fractions 3 and 4 (32-28%), but significant amounts of the protein were detected in the other fractions (Fig. 6). The Golgi marker gamma -adaptin showed a distribution comparable with that of SCG10 and was enriched in fractions 3-5, consistent with our previous immunofluorescent studies (Fig. 6). Total cellular proteins measured in each fraction show a distinct distribution (Fig. 6). SCG10-enriched fractions were then treated with high salt, nonionic detergent, and alkali in order to determine the nature of the association with Golgi membranes. Consistent with previous results obtained with SCG10-enriched smooth microsomes (2), the protein was completely extracted with 1% Triton X-100 but only partially with carbonate pH 11.4 (40-50%). No significant extraction with high salts (1.5 M) was observed (data not shown).


Fig. 6. Cofractionation of SCG10 and gamma -adaptin in a sucrose gradient. The post-nuclear supernatant (about 1 mg of total protein) was centrifuged on a 4-ml continuous sucrose gradient (37-12%), and 15-µg aliquots from each fraction were subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis. SCG10 and gamma -adaptin immunoblots show a comparable distribution of both proteins (A). The percentage of sucrose (w/w) content and the distribution of total protein in the corresponding fractions are indicated in the graph (B).
[View Larger Version of this Image (38K GIF file)]


The NH2-terminal Region of SCG10 Is Necessary and Sufficient for Membrane Binding and Targeting to the Golgi Complex

SCG10 has a structural feature that is not present in stathmin (amino acid 1-34, Fig. 3). This NH2-terminal domain contains a stretch of hydrophobic amino acids, which has been proposed to be responsible for membrane attachment of SCG10 (2). In order to address the question whether the differential localization of stathmin and SCG10 is mediated by this NH2-terminal region, we generated several plasmid constructs expressing both deletion and fusion proteins (Fig. 3). These were transfected into COS-7 cells and analyzed by double immunofluorescence. When COS-7 cells were transfected with a construct in which the NH2-terminal region of rat SCG10 (amino acids 1-34) was deleted, the truncated SCG10 molecule was found in the cytoplasm. The appearance was very similar to stathmin expression (Fig. 7). Therefore, removal of this domain led to a complete solubilization of the remaining region. This indicates that the first 34 amino acids of SCG10 contain information required for association with the Golgi complex.


Fig. 7. Intracellular distribution of the Delta NSCG10 mutant in transfected COS-7 cells. A and B, cells transfected with the truncated mutant of SCG10 were stained with the rabbit serum anti-SCG10 (A) and counterstained with the mAb directed to gamma -adaptin (B). Colocalization with the Golgi marker is not observed in transfected cells (arrows). The distribution appears diffuse in the cytoplasm. C and D, the immunoreactivity of Delta NSCG10 is reminiscent of that of stathmin (C), which does not colocalize with the Golgi marker either (D). Scale bar, 25 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (80K GIF file)]


When COS-7 cells were transfected with a construct in which the NH2-terminal domain of SCG10 was fused in frame to stathmin, the chimeric stathmin molecule, just like SCG10, was concentrated in the region of the Golgi complex as revealed by colocalization with the Golgi marker WGA (Fig. 8). This finding suggests that the NH2-terminal domain of SCG10 contains information sufficient to target the otherwise cytosolic stathmin to this intracellular compartment. To further define the mechanism responsible for intracellular targeting of SCG10, we transfected COS-7 cells with a construct in which the NH2-terminal domain of SCG10 was fused to an unrelated protein, beta -galactosidase. Although beta -galactosidase had a diffuse cytosolic localization, the SCG10 (1-34)/beta -galactosidase fusion protein was concentrated in the region of the Golgi complex (Fig. 9).


Fig. 8. Intracellular distribution of the SCG-STAT chimera expressed in COS-7 cells. A and B, cells transfected with the Glu-Glu epitope-tagged chimera were stained with the monoclonal anti-Glu-Glu antibody (A) and counterstained with the FITC-coupled lectin WGA (B). Colocalization with the Golgi marker is observed in transfected cells (arrows). The NH2 terminus of SCG10 allows the targeting to the Golgi complex region of the related protein stathmin. C and D, the immunoreactivity of SCG-STAT is very distinct from that of stathmin (C), which does not colocalize with the Golgi marker (D). Scale bar, 25 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (75K GIF file)]



Fig. 9. Intracellular distribution of the SCG-GAL chimera expressed in COS-7 cells. A and B, cells transfected with the chimera were stained with the mAb directed to beta -galactosidase (A) and counterstained with the FITC-coupled lectin WGA (B). Colocalization with the Golgi marker is observed in transfected cells (arrow). The NH2 terminus of SCG10 mediates the targeting of an unrelated protein to the Golgi complex region. C and D, the immunoreactivity of SCG-GAL differs from that of beta -galactosidase (C), which does not colocalize with the Golgi marker (D). Scale bar, 25 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (100K GIF file)]


In addition to the immunofluorescence analysis, we studied the membrane binding properties of the deletion and fusion proteins. The distribution of the proteins in the cytosolic and total membrane fractions from transiently transfected COS-7 cells was detected by Western blot analysis using anti-KT3 mAb (to detect stathmin expression), anti-SCG10, and anti-beta -galactosidase antibodies. Stathmin and beta -galactosidase were mainly found in the soluble fraction (Fig. 10, C), whereas SCG10 was located predominantly in the particulate fraction (Fig. 10, M). In contrast, Delta NSCG10 was predominantly in the soluble fraction and SCG-GAL and SCG-STAT, in which the NH2-terminal domain of SCG10 was fused to beta -galactosidase or stathmin, respectively, were in the particulate fraction (Fig. 10). This subfractionation analysis indicates that the NH2-terminal 34 amino acids of SCG10 contain enough information for membrane association.


Fig. 10. Western blot analysis of the distribution of stathmin, SCG10, deletion, and chimeric constructs in cytosolic (C) and membrane (M) fractions prepared from transiently transfected COS-7 cells. COS-7 cells were transfected with expression vectors encoding the KT3 epitope-tagged stathmin (STAT), SCG10, SCG10 lacking the NH2 terminus (Delta NSCG10), beta -galactosidase (GAL), SCG-GAL, and SCG-STAT.
[View Larger Version of this Image (43K GIF file)]


The NH2-terminal Domain of SCG10 Contains Two Cysteines That Are Sites for Palmitoylation

Cysteines have been shown to be targets for post-translational modification, mainly palmitoylation, in other neuronal proteins concentrated in axons and nerve terminals, such as GAP-43 and SNAP-25 (29, 30). Also SCG10 contains two closely spaced cysteine residues within the NH2-terminal region, at positions 22 and 24 (Fig. 3), which may represent sites for palmitoylation. To study whether SCG10 was palmitoylated, COS-7 cells were transfected with Glu-Glu epitope-tagged SCG10 and incubated with [3H]palmitic acid or [3H]myristic acid for 4 h. SCG10 was isolated by immunoprecipitation using anti-Glu-Glu mAbs and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and fluorography. To compare the expression levels of SCG10, the immunoprecipitates were analyzed by Western blotting using the SCG10 antiserum. As a control, nontransfected cells were also labeled, immunoprecipitated, and subjected to electrophoresis. The incorporation of tritium into SCG10 was detected from [3H]palmitic acid but not from [3H]myristic acid (Fig. 11, left panel). Then both cysteines (22 and 24) were mutated to alanines to determine if they were involved in the palmitoylation of SCG10. The single and double mutants and wild-type SCG10 were expressed in COS-7 cells, and the cells were labeled with [3H]palmitic acid. The absence of radioactivity in SCG10 in which both cysteines have been mutated suggests that the attachment of palmitic acid to SCG10 occurs through thioester linkage to cysteines (Fig. 11, right panel). In agreement with these data, hydroxylamine treatment, which is known to hydrolyze thioester at pH 7 (31), released the radioactivity associated with SCG10 (data not shown). We found that the Cys22 mutant (Fig. 11, A22) incorporated a much higher amount of radioactivity than the Cys24 mutant (Fig. 11, A24), indicating that Cys24 is the major site for palmitoylation (Fig. 11).


Fig. 11. [3H]Palmitic acid incorporation into SCG10 and localization of the sites of palmitoylation. COS-7 cells were transfected with wild-type SCG10 (WT), Cys to Ala22 mutant (A22), Cys to Ala24 mutant (A24), or Cys to Ala22 and Cys to Ala24 mutant (A22,24) or MOCK transfected (C). Cells were labeled with [3H]palmitate (3H-PALM) or [3H]myristate (3H-MYR) for 4 h. Duplicate samples of immunoprecipitated GluGlu-tagged SCG10 were subjected to SDS-PAGE. The gels were then processed either for 3H fluorography (upper panel) or for anti-SCG10 immunoblotting (lower panel). [3H]Palmitate but not [3H]myristate labels SCG10 protein. Both cysteines 22 and 24 are the sites of palmitylation, although Cys24 contributes to a higher extent. Exposure times were between 2 and 3 weeks. The multiple bands seen for SCG10 in the Western blot (lower panel) correspond to degradation products. The wild-type SCG10 protein is more susceptible to degradation than the mutant forms, which may explain the higher intensity of the band in the 3H fluorography (upper panel) of the Ala22 mutant. The data are representative of three separate experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (37K GIF file)]


Palmitoylation Contributes to the Membrane Attachment and Targeting of SCG10 to the Golgi Complex

To assess whether palmitic acid is involved in the membrane anchoring of SCG10, we analyzed whether replacing the two cysteines would affect the membrane binding ability of SCG10. We transiently transfected COS-7 cells with constructs in which Cys22, Cys24, or both were replaced by alanine residues. Double immunofluorescence analysis revealed that the mutated proteins did not colocalize with the Golgi marker protein gamma -adaptin but showed a more cytosolic distribution as compared with the wild type (Fig. 12). In some cells, however, localization to the Golgi complex appeared to be retained when Cys22 was mutated (Fig. 12C). As shown in Fig. 13, in all three cases, the mutations caused only partial solubilization of the protein, whereas removal of the entire NH2-terminal domain led to nearly complete solubilization. In all subfractionation analysis by Western blot, we defined the cytosol and membrane contamination contributing the signal of membrane or cytosol fraction, respectively, by using stathmin as a cytosol marker and gamma -adaptin as a membrane marker. In both cases, we found 8% (± 3%) contamination (not shown).


Fig. 12. Intracellular distribution of SCG10 mutant proteins in which cysteine 22 and/or 24 have been replaced by alanines. Cells were transiently transfected with wild-type (A and B), Cys to Ala22 (C and D), Cys to Ala24 (E and F), Cys to Ala22 and Cys to Ala24 (G and H) constructs. They were stained with the rabbit serum anti-SCG10 (A, C, E, and G) and counterstained with the mAb directed to gamma -adaptin (B, D, F, and H). Cysteines 22 and 24 present in the NH2-terminal region of SCG10 are involved in membrane attachment, because their mutation into alanines results in solubilization of the proteins into the cytosol. Scale bar, 25 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (88K GIF file)]



Fig. 13. Distribution of SCG10 mutant proteins in cytosolic and membrane fractions prepared from transiently transfected COS-7 cells. Cells were transfected with wild-type SCG10 (WT), Cys to Ala22 mutant (A22), Cys to Ala24 mutant (A24), or Cys to Ala22 and Cys to Ala24 mutant (A22,24) or SCG10 lacking the first 34 amino acids (Delta N). The graph shows the results of three independent experiments in which the protein levels were measured by optic densitometry of Western blot autoradiograms. Mutation of one or both cysteines into alanine results in a partial solubilization of the proteins into the cytosolic fraction. In contrast, deletion of the NH2-terminal domain leads to nearly complete solubilization into the cytosolic fraction.
[View Larger Version of this Image (42K GIF file)]



DISCUSSION

In this study, we have investigated the molecular mechanism responsible for the membrane targeting of the neurospecific protein SCG10, which is closely related to the ubiquitous soluble protein stathmin. Analysis of the subcellular localization in PC12 cells and transfected COS-7 cells indicated that SCG10 colocalized with the region of the Golgi complex and that both specific structural elements and palmitoylation within the NH2-terminal region were responsible for membrane association and localization in this area.

For these studies, we used existing antibodies for stathmin and generated polyclonal and mAbs for SCG10, all three of which were highly specific in Western blots and immunofluorescence. Because native PC12 cells contain only barely detectable levels of SCG10 (data not shown), for these experiments, PC12 cells were treated with NGF for 24 h. It was known from previous results that SCG10 is up-regulated in response to NGF in this cell line (4). NGF-stimulated PC12 cells showed strong immunoreactivity for both stathmin and SCG10, but the subcellular distribution of these two very similar proteins was strikingly different. Whereas stathmin immunoreactivity was cytosolic as expected for a soluble protein (1), SCG10 accumulated in the perinuclear region. This is in agreement with previous studies that have shown a punctate SCG10 staining of the perinuclear cytoplasm in neuronal cell bodies (2). Here, we have further defined the localization of SCG10 to the area of the Golgi complex.

Both endogenous protein in NGF-induced PC12 cells and exogenous protein in transfected COS-7 cells colocalized with markers for the Golgi compartment, including alpha -mannosidase II, gamma -adaptin, and the lectin WGA (Figs. 2 and 4). SCG10 immunoreactivity was sensitive to the Golgi-disrupting agent brefeldin A (data not shown) and remained associated to a large extent, although not completely, with the Golgi markers following perturbation of Golgi organization with nocodazole (Fig. 5). Consistent with colocalization studies, SCG10 largely cofractionated with gamma -adaptin following subcellular fractionation of transfected COS-7 cells on a sucrose density gradient. Altogether, these results strongly suggest that SCG10 is associated with the Golgi apparatus, although further electron microscope-based analysis will be required to determine the precise location in the Golgi compartment.

SCG10 was described as a membrane-associated but not an integral membrane protein, whose association with smooth microsomal membranes was efficiently disrupted with nonionic detergent but only partially with alkali (2). Structural features of the SCG10 protein sequence led to the speculation that a short stretch of hydrophobic amino acids within the NH2-terminal domain of SCG10 (and not conserved in stathmin) might mediate membrane interaction (2). We examined this possibility by separate expression of stathmin, SCG10, a NH2-terminal deleted SCG10, and SCG10-stathmin and SCG10-beta -galactosidase fusion proteins in transfected cells. Our results indicate that specific signals within the NH2-terminal 34 amino-acids of SCG10 are required not only for membrane binding but also for its targeting to the area of the Golgi complex. Moreover, we showed that the NH2-terminal domain is sufficient to target heterologous proteins to the same region. The results of immunofluorescence were always consistent with results obtained from crude subcellular fractionation. Because these experiments were performed in transfected COS-7 cells, the mechanism through which the NH2-terminal region of SCG10 targets the protein to this subcellular region is not neuron-specific.

In the case of other nerve terminal proteins, GAP-43 and SNAP-25, fatty acylation (palmitoylation) on cysteine residues was shown to mediate membrane association (29, 30, 32). SCG10 also contains two cysteines within the NH2-terminal region. Therefore, we investigated whether SCG10 was palmitoylated on these cysteines and whether palmitoylation may be the mechanism responsible for the membrane targeting. Indeed, both cysteines 22 and 24 were found to be palmitoylated in transfected COS-7 cells, but Cys24 was palmitoylated to a higher extent. Interestingly, the Cys22 mutant was more labeled than the wild-type protein. Because the mutant SCG10 proteins showed less degradation products in the Western blots, this may indicate that the wild-type protein is more susceptible to proteolytic cleavage that may remove the radioactivity. Furthermore, replacement of Cys22 or Cys24 or both by alanine caused a cytosolic distribution of a large proportion of the protein. These data suggest an important role of cysteine residues in the membrane targeting of SCG10.

However, because mutation of the cysteines did not result in complete solubilization of SCG10, in addition to palmitoylation other signals contained within the NH2-terminal domain must be responsible for the membrane distribution and targeting of this protein. A similar finding was obtained for glutamic acid decarboxylase, which exists in two major isoforms, one of which is palmitoylated and Golgi complex-associated. The targeting of this isoform does not depend on palmitoylation but on a signal within the NH2-terminal 27 amino acids of the protein (33). However, the NH2-terminal regions of SCG10 and glutamic acid decarboxylase do not share sequence similarity. Thus, the precise mechanism by which the NH2-terminal domain of SCG10 targets the protein to the subcellular compartments remains to be established. Interestingly, basic amino acids in the NH2 terminus of Src, which is myristoylated, have been involved in membrane binding through electrostatic interaction with acidic phospholipids (34). The presence of five basic amino acids (four lysines and one arginine) in the first 34 NH2-terminal amino acids of SCG10 (Fig. 3) suggest that a similar mechanism may be involved. Future transfection experiments of SCG10 constructs in neurons may elucidate whether the same signals that target SCG10 to the Golgi complex region mediate the targeting to the growth cones or whether additional signals or an interaction with other proteins are required for growth cone targeting.

The SCG10-related protein stathmin was shown to destabilize microtubules by increasing their catastrophe rate (transition from a growing to a shrinking state) (11). Our recent studies have identified a similar role for SCG10 as a mediator of neurite outgrowth through regulation of microtubule dynamics (12). Owing to its membrane association, SCG10 is likely to function in specific subcellular compartments, including Golgi and neuronal growth cones. The dynamic interaction between intracellular organelles and microtubules may specifically require proteins, like SCG10, acting as microtubule-disrupting factors to regulate trafficking events. Alternatively, SCG10 might use the sorting machinery to access to neuronal growth cones, regulating neurite outgrowth-associated events via its action on microtubules dynamics.


FOOTNOTES

*   The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
par    To whom correspondence should be addressed: Geneva Biomedical Research Inst., 14, chemin des Aulx, Case Postale 674, 1228 Plan-les-Ouates/Geneva, Switzerland. Tel.: 41-22-706-96-66; Fax: 41-22-794-69-65.
1    The abbreviations used are: NGF, nerve growth factor; mAb, monoclonal antibody; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; WGA, wheat germ agglutinin; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; SCG-GAL, chimeric construct where the NH2 terminus of SCG10 has been fused to the beta -galactosidase moiety; SCG-STAT, chimeric construct where the NH2 terminus of SCG10 has been fused to stathmin.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jonathan Knowles and all of the members of the neurobiology group at the Geneva Biomedical Research Institute for helpful discussion. We are grateful to A. Sobel, who generously contributed the anti-stathmin antibody. We also thank A. Bernard, H. Blasey, J. Y. Bonnefoy, N. Gullu, C. Hebert, S. Herren, P. Graber, L. Potier, and E. Sebille for support at various stages of this work. We thank S. Arkinstall, M. Edgerton, and E. Merlo Pich for many helpful comments and critical reading of the manuscript. Finally, we acknowledge Jean Gruenberg and Manuel Rojo for excellent technical and intellectual support.


REFERENCES

  1. Sobel, A., Boutterin, M. C., Beretta, L., Chneiweiss, H., Doye, V., and Peyro-Saint-Paul, H. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 3765-3772 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Stein, R., Mori, N., Matthews, K., Lo, L. C., and Anderson, D. J. (1988) Neuron 1, 463-476 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Anderson, D. J., and Axel, R. (1985) Cell 42, 649-662 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Stein, R., Orit, S., and Anderson, D. J. (1988) Dev. Biol. 127, 316-325 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Schubart, U. K., Banerjee, M. D., and Eng, J. (1989) DNA 8, 389-398 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Sobel, A. (1991) Trends Biochem. Sci. 16, 301-305 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Luo, X. N., Mookerjee, B., Ferrari, A., Mistry, S., and Atweh, G. F. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 10312-10318 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Brattsand, G., Marklund, U., Nylander, K., Roos, G., and Gullberg, M. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 220, 359-368 [Abstract]
  9. Marklund, U., Osterman, O., Melander, H., Bergh, A., and Gullberg, M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 30626-30635 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Di Paolo, G., Pellier, V., Catsicas, M., Antonsson, B., Catsicas, S., and Grenningloh, G. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 133, 1383-1390 [Abstract]
  11. Belmont, L. D., and Mitchison, T. J. (1996) Cell 84, 623-631 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Riederer, B. M., Pellier, V., Antonsson, B., Di Paolo, G., Stimpson, S. A., Lutjens, R., Catsicas, S., and Grenningloh, G. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 741-745 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Koppel, J., Boutterin, M. C., Doye, V., Peyro-Saint-Paul, H., and Sobel, A. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 3703-3707 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Spindler, K. R., Rosser, D. S., and Berk, A. J. (1984) J. Virol. 49, 132-141 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. MacArthur, H., and Walter, G. (1984) J. Virol. 52, 483-491 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Grussenmyer, T., Scheidtmann, K. H., Hutchinson, M. A., and Walter, G. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 7952-7954 [Abstract]
  17. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  18. Martin, G. A., Viskochil, D., Bollag, G., McCabe, P. C., Crosier, W. J., Haubruck, H., Conroy, L., Clark, R., O'Connell, P., Cawthon, R. M., Innis, M. A., and McCormick, F. (1990) Cell 63, 843-849 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Rubinfeld, B., Munemitsu, S., Clark, R., Conroy, L., Watt, K., Crosier, W. J., McCormick, F., and Polakis, P. (1991) Cell 65, 1033-1042 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Nelson, R. M., and Long, G. L. (1989) Anal. Biochem. 180, 147-151 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Greene, L. A., and Tischler, A. S. (1976) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 73, 2424-2428 [Abstract]
  22. Wessel, D., and Flügge, U. I (1984) Anal. Biochem. 138, 141-143 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Burke, B., Griffiths, G., Reggio, H., Louvard, D., and Warren, G. (1982) EMBO Journal 1, 1621-1628 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Tartakoff, A. M., and Vassalli, P. (1983) J. Cell Biol. 97, 1243-1248 [Abstract]
  25. Robinson, M. S., and Kreis, T. E. (1992) Cell 69, 129-138 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Rogalsky, A. A., and Singer, S. J. (1984) J. Cell Biol. 99, 1092-1100 [Abstract]
  27. Fujiwara, T., Oda, K., Yokota, S., Takatsuki, A., and Ikehara, Y. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 18545-18552 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Lippincott-Schwartz, J., Yuan, L. C., Bonifacino, J. S., and Klausner, R. D. (1989) Cell 56, 801-813 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Liu, Y., Chapman, E. R., and Storm, D. (1991) Neuron 6, 411-420 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Hess, D. T., Slater, T. M., Wilson, M. C., and Skene, J. H. (1992) J. Neurosci. 12, 4634-4641 [Abstract]
  31. James, G., and Olson, E. (1990) in Methods: A Companion to Methods in Enzymology (Casey, P., ed), pp. 270-275, Academic Press, New York
  32. Skene, J. H. P., and Virag, I. (1989) J. Cell Biol. 108, 613-624 [Abstract]
  33. Solimena, M., Dirkx, R., Jr., Radzynski, M., Mundigl, O., and De Camilli, P. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 126, 331-341 [Abstract]
  34. Sigal, C. T., Zhou, W., Buser, C. A., McLaughlin, S., and Resh, M. D. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 12253-12257 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.