The Protein-tyrosine Phosphatase SHP-2 Binds Platelet/Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 (PECAM-1) and Forms a Distinct Signaling Complex during Platelet Aggregation
EVIDENCE FOR A MECHANISTIC LINK BETWEEN PECAM-1- AND INTEGRIN-MEDIATED CELLULAR SIGNALING*

(Received for publication, October 2, 1996, and in revised form, January 7, 1997)

Denise E. Jackson Dagger , Christopher M. Ward Dagger , Ronggang Wang Dagger and Peter J. Newman Dagger §

From the Dagger  Blood Research Institute, Blood Center of Southeastern Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53233-2121 and the § Departments of Cellular Biology and Pharmacology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1) is a homophilic adhesion receptor that mediates leukocyte/endothelial cell interactions that take place during transendothelial migration. Recent reports have shown that the binding of certain anti-PECAM-1 antibodies results in up-regulation of integrin function on the surface of leukocytes and platelets, suggesting that PECAM-1 may be capable of transmitting information into the cell following its engagement. PECAM-1 isolated from resting or activated but nonaggregated platelets was phosphorylated predominantly on serine residues; however, PECAM-1 derived from activated, aggregated platelets was strongly phosphorylated on tyrosine. Synthetic tyrosine-phosphorylated peptides derived from five different regions within the cytoplasmic domain of PECAM-1 were screened for their ability to associate with cytoplasmic signaling molecules. The protein-tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2 was found to interact specifically with two different PECAM-1 phosphopeptides containing highly conserved phosphatase-binding motifs on PECAM-1 with the sequences VQpY663TEV and TVpY686SEV. More important, SHP-2 bound not only PECAM-1 phosphopeptides, but also became associated with full-length cellular PECAM-1 during the platelet aggregation process, and this interaction was mediated by the amino-terminal Src homology 2 domains of the phosphatase. Since SHP-2 normally serves as a positive regulator of signal transduction, its association with activated PECAM-1 suggests a number of potential mechanisms by which PECAM-1 engagement might be coupled to integrin activation in vascular cells.


INTRODUCTION

PECAM-11 is a 130-kDa member of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily that is expressed on platelets and leukocytes and is also present at high concentration at the intercellular junctions of endothelial cells (for a review, see Refs. 1 and 2). Because of its presence on the surface of these vascular cells, PECAM-1 has been implicated in mediating a number of cell/cell interactions, including those that take place during cell migration (3), transendothelial migration of monocytes and neutrophils (4), and following antigenic stimulation of transmigrating lymphocytes (5). Although multiple mechanisms have been proposed for PECAM-1-mediated adhesion events, recent studies suggest that PECAM-1 molecules on adjacent cells are able to interact homophilically with each other, utilizing amino-terminal Ig homology domains 1 and 2 to effect these cellular associations (6, 7).

In addition to serving as a cell adhesion receptor, several lines of evidence suggest that PECAM-1 may be capable of transmitting signals into the cell following its engagement. Tanaka et al. (8) were the first to show that antibody-mediated engagement of PECAM-1 on the surface of lymphocytes could lead to up-regulation of integrin function, a finding that has been reproduced in lymphokine-activated killer cells (9), CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells (10), monocytes and neutrophils (11), and natural killer cells (12). Although stimulation of Fc receptors by bound antibody may be contributing to cellular activation in some of these studies, it is likely that PECAM-1 dimerization itself may be capable of transducing as yet undefined signals into the cell, a process that could be mimicked by homophilic PECAM-1/PECAM-1 interactions that are thought to occur between leukocytes and endothelial cells during the process of transendothelial migration.

The mechanism by which PECAM-1 engagement might lead to downstream signaling events is unknown. Previous studies have shown that, following cellular activation, PECAM-1 becomes phosphorylated (13, 14), but the target for this phosphorylation event appeared to be serine residues within the cytoplasmic domain (13). A more recent report by Modderman et al. (15) showed that PECAM-1 derived from resting platelets that had been preincubated with the membrane-permeable tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor pervanadate became tyrosine-phosphorylated. Precisely when this might occur, if at all, during normal platelet physiology remained to be determined, but it was clear from their studies that the balance of intracellular kinases and phosphatases was likely to play a role in regulating both the stoichiometry of PECAM-1 phosphorylation and the residues that might become phosphorylated during different stages of cellular activation.

The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether PECAM-1 could become tyrosine-phosphorylated in response to agonist-induced cellular activation and subsequent cell/cell interactions. In addition, we sought to identify cytoplasmic signaling molecules that might associate with the cytoplasmic domain of PECAM-1 and to provide a mechanistic link between PECAM-1 engagement and the subsequent activation of cell-surface integrins that had been observed in previous investigations. Using human platelets as a model, we show that PECAM-1 becomes tyrosine-phosphorylated during the platelet aggregation process and that this creates docking sites for the protein-tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2. The interaction between SHP-2 and PECAM-1 is dependent upon integrin-mediated platelet/platelet interactions and occurs via the Src homology 2 (SH2) domains of the phosphatase and highly conserved phosphatase-binding motifs encompassing phosphotyrosines 663 and 686 within the cytoplasmic domain of PECAM-1.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

Phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, prostaglandin E1, Triton X-100, bovine serum albumin, leupeptin, streptavidin-agarose, cyanogen bromide-activated Sepharose, dimethyl sulfoxide, pyridine, aprotinin, and reduced glutathione were purchased from Sigma. Protein G-Sepharose and glutathione-Sepharose 4B were from Pharmacia Biotech (Uppsala). Recombinant N- and C-terminal SH2 domains of the protein-tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2, expressed as a GST fusion protein (GST-N-SH2-C-SH2), were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Polyvinylidene difluoride membranes were obtained from Millipore Corp. (Bedford, MA). Sodium dodecyl sulfate, glycine, prestained broad range standards, Affi-Gel 10, Tween 20, and TEMED were from Bio-Rad. The enhanced chemiluminescence Western blotting detection kit was obtained from Amersham Life Science, Inc. [32P]Orthophosphate was obtained from DuPont NEN. TLC plates were purchased from Merck. Fresh platelet concentrates (<2 days old) were provided by volunteer donors to The Blood Center of Southeastern Wisconsin (Milwaukee, WI).

Antibodies

The properties of the anti-PECAM-1 murine monoclonal antibodies PECAM-1.2 (specific for extracellular Ig homology domain 6) and PECAM-1.3 (specific for Ig homology domain 1) have been previously described (6). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated PY-20 (an anti-phosphotyrosine murine monoclonal antibody) was obtained from Zymed Laboratories, Inc. (South San Francisco). Polyclonal antibodies directed to the N- and C-terminal SH2 domains of the protein-tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2 were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. This antibody specifically recognizes a single SHP-2 band in cell lysates and does not cross-react with SHP-1. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG was obtained from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc. (West Grove, PA). Normal rabbit IgG and normal mouse IgG1 were obtained from Sigma.

Preparation of Washed Platelets

Platelets were obtained from normal healthy volunteers who had not taken any antiplatelet medication in the preceding 10 days. Whole blood was anticoagulated with acid citrate/dextrose, pH 4.6, in the presence of 50 ng/ml prostaglandin E1 according to previously described methods (13). Platelet-rich plasma was obtained by centrifugation at 250 × g for 15 min at room temperature, and platelets were obtained by sedimentation at 1000 × g for 15 min. The platelet pellet was washed twice in Ringer citrate/dextrose buffer (108 mM NaCl, 38 mM KCl, 1.7 mM NaHCO3, 21.2 mM sodium citrate, 27.8 mM glucose, and 1.1 mM MgCl2, pH 6.5) in the presence of 50 ng/ml prostaglandin E1. Finally, the platelet pellet was resuspended in Ringer citrate/dextrose buffer, pH 7.4, at a concentration of 1 × 109 platelets/ml.

Platelet Activation/Aggregation Studies

Washed platelets were activated by the addition of 7 µM TRAP in the absence of stirring. In some instances, F(ab')2 fragments of PECAM-1.2 were used to activate platelets resuspended in 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, and 100 µg/ml fibrinogen. Platelet aggregation was induced by adding 7 µM TRAP to stirred platelets (1000 rpm) in the presence of 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, and 100 µg/ml fibrinogen for 3-10 min at 37 °C in a four-channel automated platelet analyzer (BioData Corp., Horsham, PA). In some experiments, platelets were preincubated for 5 min at 37 °C with 0.5 mM RGDW peptide prior to activation by TRAP.

Preparation of Platelet Extracts

Platelets subjected to either activation or aggregation were lysed by the addition of 0.5 ml of Triton lysis buffer (2% Triton X-100, 10 mM EGTA, 15 mM HEPES, 145 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 20 µg/ml leupeptin, and 2 mM sodium orthovanadate, pH 7.4), and the lysate was slowly rocked for 1 h at 4 °C. Triton-soluble and -insoluble (cytoskeletal) fractions were separated by centrifugation at 15,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C as described previously (13). In some experiments, samples were lysed by the addition of an equal volume of ice-cold 2 × radioimmune precipitation assay buffer (final concentration = 20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 1 mM EGTA, 158 mM NaCl, 0.1% (w/v) SDS, 1% (w/v) sodium deoxycholate, 1 mM Na3VO4, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1% (v/v) Triton X-100).

Immunoprecipitation Analysis

Following fractionation of the 15,000 × g Triton-soluble platelet supernatant, lysates were precleared with 50 µl of a 50% slurry of CNBr-activated Sepharose for 30 min at 4 °C and then centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 5 min. Precleared lysates were incubated overnight with either PECAM-1.3 (10 µg/ml) or normal mouse IgG1 (10 µg/ml). Immune complexes were recovered using 50 µl of a 50% slurry of protein G-Sepharose and washed four times by brief centrifugation in immunoprecipitation buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, containing 150 mM NaCl and 2% Triton X-100). Bound proteins were eluted from the beads in SDS reducing sample buffer, boiled for 10 min, resolved by 12.5% SDS-PAGE, transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, and analyzed by immunoblotting with a 1:5000 dilution of either horseradish peroxidase-conjugated PY-20 or polyclonal antibodies directed against either the C- or N-terminal SH2 domain of SHP-2. In the latter two cases, the membrane was additionally incubated for 1 h with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:25,000). Immunoreactivity was then determined by chemiluminescence detection according to the manufacturer's instructions (Amersham Life Science, Inc.).

Peptide Synthesis

PECAM-1 peptides were synthesized using a Model 9050 Pepsynthesizer (Millipore Corp.) with Fmoc chemistry as described previously (16). Minor modifications to the procedure included the incorporation of phosphotyrosine residues during peptide synthesis. Fmoc-Tyr(PO3tBu2)-OH (Quality Controlled Biochemicals, Hopkinton, MA) was side chain-protected with a t-butyl group and was introduced as the free acid. It was activated with 2-(1H-benzotriazol-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyluronium tetrafluoroborate and 0.3 M 1-hydroxylbenzotriazole hydrate in dimethylacetamide. Prior to cleavage from the resin, peptides were biotinylated at the amino terminus by incubation with a 1.5-fold molar excess of NHS-LC-biotin (Pierce) dissolved in dimethylacetamide containing 20% 4-dimethylaminopyridine to facilitate coupling. All peptides were >85% purity and were analyzed by electrospray mass spectroscopy (Protein Structure and Carbohydrate Facility, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI) to confirm the expected molecular mass for both the nonphosphorylated and phosphorylated PECAM cytoplasmic tail peptides. Lyophilized biotinylated peptides were finally dissolved at a final concentration of 1 mg/ml in 10 mM sodium phosphate and 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4, containing 0.3% dimethyl sulfoxide and were stored at 4 °C until use.

Peptide Binding Studies

Peptides (10 µg/ml) were incubated with 1.5 mg of 15,000 × g Triton-soluble platelet proteins overnight at 4 °C with constant mixing. Fifty µl of streptavidin-agarose beads were then added to the peptide mixture and incubated for an additional hour at 4 °C. The beads were washed five times in immunoprecipitation buffer by centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 5 min. Bound proteins were eluted in SDS sample buffer, boiled 10 min, and resolved by 12.5% SDS-PAGE.

Phosphoamino Acid Analysis

Washed platelets were resuspended at 1 × 109 platelets/ml in 138 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 5 mM glucose, and 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, and incubated at 37 °C unstirred with 0.5 mCi/ml 32Pi (carrier-free sodium orthophosphate) for 3 h. 32P-Labeled platelets were then sedimented by centrifugation and resuspended in gel filtration buffer (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 3.3 mM NaH2PO4, and 20 mM HEPES, pH 7,.4 with 0.1% (w/v) glucose and 0.1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin). Following the addition of 500 µl of 2 × radioimmune precipitation assay buffer containing 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 32P-labeled platelet proteins were immunoprecipitated using PECAM-1.3-Affi-Gel 10 beads, separated by SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions, and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. Labeled bands were identified by autoradiography, excised, submerged in 6 N HCl, and boiled for 60 min at 110 °C. The supernatant containing the phosphoamino acids was dried, and the residue was dissolved in 10 µl of water. Two-µl aliquots of the 32P-labeled samples and unlabeled phosphoamino acid standards (1 mg/ml) were dotted sequentially onto cellulose TLC plates and air-dried. Hydrolysates were resolved by electrophoresis in two dimensions: first at pH 1.9 in 0.58 M formic acid and 1.36 M acetic acid (1000 V for 20 min) and then at pH 3.5 in 0.87 M acetic acid, 0.5% (v/v) pyridine, and 0.5 mM EDTA (500 V for 25 min). TLC plates were dried at 80 °C, stained with ninhydrin to reveal the migration of the unlabeled standards, and then subjected to autoradiography to detect comigrating 32P-labeled amino acids (17).


RESULTS

PECAM-1 Becomes Tyrosine-phosphorylated during Platelet Aggregation

Previous studies have shown that the cytoplasmic domain of PECAM-1 becomes phosphorylated on serine residues following activation of platelets with either thrombin or phorbol ester (13). To examine whether one or more of the five tyrosine residues within the PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain might also become phosphorylated under certain physiological conditions, we compared the phosphorylation state of PECAM-1 in human platelets that were 1) resting; 2) activated with TRAP without stirring (i.e. nonaggregated); or 3) TRAP-activated, stirred, and fully aggregated. Following detergent lysis in the presence of the tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor vanadate (see "Experimental Procedures"), the phosphorylation state of PECAM-1 was evaluated both immunochemically and biochemically. As shown in Fig. 1A, PECAM-1 was 32P-labeled in both resting and activated platelets (lanes 1 and 2), but incorporation of [32P]orthophosphate into PECAM-1 was greatest under conditions where aggregation had been allowed to occur (lane 3). To determine which residues within the cytoplasmic domain of PECAM-1 had become phosphorylated under each of these three conditions, the three bands shown in the top row of Fig. 1A were excised from the gel and acid-hydrolyzed, and phosphoamino acids were analyzed by two-dimensional electrophoresis. As shown in Fig. 1B, PECAM-1 derived from resting platelets was slightly phosphorylated on serine (panel 1), and the level of serine phosphorylation increased 2-3-fold following platelet activation (panel 2), as reported previously (13). No labeling of tyrosine residues was observed in either resting or activated cells (panels and 2), even when the film was overexposed (data not shown). Interestingly, whereas 32P had been incorporated solely on serine residues in PECAM-1 derived from resting or activated, nonaggregated platelets, phosphotyrosine was readily detectable in PECAM-1 derived from activated, aggregated platelets. These findings were confirmed immunologically in immunoblot analysis employing the anti-phosphotyrosine-specific monoclonal antibody PY-20 (Fig. 1C, lanes 1-3). Interestingly, the addition of RGD peptide before TRAP stimulation blocked tyrosine phosphorylation of PECAM-1 (lane 4), suggesting that this event required prior integrin-mediated platelet aggregation. Together, these data indicate that PECAM-1 initially becomes phosphorylated on one or more serine residues upon platelet activation, followed by tyrosine phosphorylation sometime during the platelet aggregation process.


Fig. 1. PECAM-1 becomes tyrosine-phosphorylated upon platelet aggregation. A: total phosphorylation of PECAM-1 in immunoprecipitates of lysates from platelets metabolically labeled with 32P. PECAM-1 (arrow) is shown for resting (lane 1), TRAP-activated (lane 2), and TRAP-aggregated (lane 3) platelet lysates (top row). An equivalent blot was probed with the anti-PECAM-1 polyclonal antibody SEW16 to show relative antigen load (bottom row). B: phosphoamino acid analysis of PECAM-1 derived from resting (panel 1), activated (panel 2), and aggregated (panel 3) platelets. 32P-Labeled PECAM-1 (shown in lanes 1-3 in the top row in A) was excised from the gel and subjected to acid hydrolysis, and the phosphoamino acids were resolved by two-dimensional thin-layer electrophoresis as described under "Experimental Procedures." Dashed ovals indicate the positions of phosphoserine (PS), phosphothreonine (PT), and phosphotyrosine (PY) standards run simultaneously with the labeled samples and detected with ninhydrin. Incompletely hydrolyzed phosphopeptides (pp) and the origin of sample loading (+) are also shown. C: upper panel, phosphotyrosine blot of PECAM-1 immunoprecipitated from resting (lane 1), TRAP-activated (lane 2), and TRAP-aggregated (lane 3) platelet lysates. Note that tyrosine phosphorylation of PECAM-1 is largely aggregation-dependent, as inhibition of aggregation with 0.5 mM RGDW peptide (lane 4) noticeably abrogates the PY-20 signal. Lower panel: identical blot stripped and reprobed with the anti-PECAM-1 antibody SEW16 to show equivalent amounts of PECAM-1 antigen loaded into each lane.
[View Larger Version of this Image (30K GIF file)]


Interaction of the Protein-tyrosine Phosphatase SHP-2 with Tyrosine-phosphorylated Peptides Derived from the Cytoplasmic Domain of PECAM-1

The cytoplasmic domain of PECAM-1 is structurally and functionally complex, being encoded by eight distinct exons (exons 9-16) that can be alternatively spliced to yield different PECAM-1 isoforms (18-20). Regions of the cytoplasmic domain encoded by exons 9, 11, and 13-15 each contain a tyrosine residue that could have become phosphorylated during platelet aggregation. To determine whether any of these might be involved in targeting one or more cytoskeletal or cytosolic signaling molecules to the cytoplasmic domain of PECAM-1 in activated, aggregated platelets, we synthesized a matched series of biotinylated 11-amino acid peptides corresponding to a specific region of the PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain, each, with the exception of PECAM-(594-604) (residue 594 is the first amino acid of the cytoplasmic domain), containing the potential tyrosine phosphorylation site in the center, with and without phosphate (Fig. 2A). These biotinylated peptides were mixed with detergent lysates of resting human platelets, and bound proteins were recovered using streptavidin-agarose beads. Immunoblot analysis using a series of antibodies specific for signaling molecules known to be present in human platelets identified SHP-2, a 70-kDa protein-tyrosine phosphatase, bound to PECAM-1-(658-668) and PECAM-1-(681-691) (regions encoded by exons 13 and 14 of the PECAM-1 gene, respectively), but only when the peptides themselves were tyrosine-phosphorylated at Tyr663 and Tyr686 (Fig. 2B). Interaction of SHP-2 with each of the two biotinylated peptides was specific, as formation of the complex could be competitively inhibited by a 20-50-fold molar excess of nonbiotinylated PECAM-1 phosphopeptide (Fig. 2, C and D).


Fig. 2. Association of the protein-tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2 with PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain phosphopeptides. A, design of biotinylated PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain phosphopeptides used in this study. An identical set of control peptides (not shown) was prepared using a nonphosphorylated tyrosine amino acid in the appropriate position. B, SHP-2 immunoblot of proteins captured by PECAM-1 phosphopeptides. Protein (1.5 mg) derived from the 15,000 × g supernatant of Triton-solubilized resting platelets was incubated with 10 µg of each biotinylated PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain peptide. Protein-peptide complexes were captured using streptavidin-agarose beads, separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, and subjected to immunoblot analysis using a variety of antibodies to signal transduction molecules. The blot shown was developed with a polyclonal antibody to the protein-tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2. Note that PECAM-1-(658-668) and PECAM-1-(681-691) bound SHP-2, but only when the centrally located tyrosine residue was phosphorylated (lanes 7 and 9). The migration of SHP-2 and the specificity of the immunoblot were demonstrated by subjecting 100 µg of platelet lysate to SHP-2 immunoblot analysis (lane 13). Lane 12 was left blank to separate the samples. The interaction between SHP-2 and the PECAM-1-(658-668) and PECAM-1-(681-691) phosphopeptides was specific, as addition of increasing amounts of nonbiotinylated phosphopeptide specifically inhibited capture by the biotinylated PECAM phosphopeptide (C and D). Stds, standards; Y(P), phosphotyrosine.
[View Larger Version of this Image (37K GIF file)]


SH2 Domains of SHP-2 Mediate Binding to PECAM-1-(658-668) and PECAM-1-(681-691)

SHP-2 is one of several intracellular cytosolic protein-tyrosine phosphatases that are able to localize to specific sites within the cell and has been shown to interact with a number of activated growth factor receptors via its SH2 domains located at the amino terminus of the molecule (depicted schematically in Fig. 3A). To examine whether the SH2 domains of SHP-2 were responsible for associating with the two biotinylated PECAM-1 phosphopeptides identified above, the tyrosine-phosphorylated or nonphosphorylated forms were incubated with a GST fusion protein containing both the amino- and carboxyl-terminal SH2 domains of SHP-2, and complexes were captured with streptavidin-agarose beads. As shown in Fig. 3 (B and C, left panels), nonphosphorylated peptides failed to associate with either GST alone (lanes 1-3) or the GST-N-SH2-C-SH2 fusion protein (lanes 4-6). In contrast, phosphopeptides encompassing Tyr663 and Tyr686 bound avidly to the GST fusion protein containing the two SH2 domains of SHP-2 (Fig. 3, B and C, right panels, lanes 4-6). This interaction was specific, as the phosphopeptides did not interact with the GST protein alone (right panels, lanes 1-3). These data demonstrate that the interaction of SHP-2 with these two PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain phosphopeptides is directly mediated by one or both of the amino-terminal SH2 domains of the phosphatase.


Fig. 3. In vitro binding of PECAM phosphopeptides with the SH2 domains of SHP-2. A, shown are the domain structures of SHP-2 (I) and a GST fusion construct containing only the SH2 domains of SHP-2 (II). B and C, 10 µg of the indicated PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain peptide were incubated with GST alone (lanes 1-3) or with a GST fusion protein containing both SH2 domains of SHP-2 (lanes 4-6) at final concentrations of 0.5 (lanes 1 and 4), 1.0 (lanes and 5), and 2.0 (lanes 3 and 6) µg/ml. The resulting complexes were precipitated by streptavidin-agarose, resolved by 12.5% SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted using an anti-SHP-2 polyclonal antibody. Note that the SH2 domains of SHP-2 interacted only with the tyrosine-phosphorylated forms of the PECAM-1-(658-668) and PECAM-1-(681-691) peptides. PTPase, protein-tyrosine phosphatase; Stds, standards; Y(P), phosphotyrosine.
[View Larger Version of this Image (36K GIF file)]


SHP-2 Binds PECAM-1 in Activated, Aggregated Human Platelets

Although PECAM-1 becomes phosphorylated on tyrosine residues during platelet aggregation (Fig. 1), and SHP-2 binds to synthetic phosphopeptides corresponding to two small discrete regions within the cytoplasmic domain of PECAM-1 (Fig. 2), the ability of SHP-2 to associate with cellular PECAM-1 in an activated human platelet remained to be demonstrated. To address this issue, PECAM-1 was immunoprecipitated from detergent lysates of platelets that had been (a) treated with buffer (resting), (b) TRAP-activated but not aggregated, or (c) TRAP-activated and fully aggregated, and the resulting immunoprecipitate was probed for the presence of SHP-2 by immunoblot analysis. As shown in Fig. 4, a small amount of SHP-2 became associated with PECAM-1 following platelet activation, but this increased greatly when platelet aggregation was allowed to occur. Similar to the PECAM-1 phosphopeptide studies described for Fig. 3, the binding of SHP-2 to full-length PECAM-1 was mediated by the SH2 domains of the phosphatase (Fig. 5). In parallel with the requirements for tyrosine phosphorylation of PECAM-1 (Fig. 1C), the association of SHP-2 with PECAM-1 required integrin-mediated platelet/platelet interactions, as the addition of 0.5 mM RGDW peptide to the cuvette before TRAP-induced platelet activation completely blocked formation of the PECAM-1·SHP-2 complex. Cross-linking of PECAM-1 on the platelet surface using an F(ab')2 fragment of the anti-PECAM-1 monoclonal antibody PECAM-1.2 also resulted in a small degree of SHP-2 binding (Fig. 4, last lane), consistent with the known ability of this antibody to expose P-selectin on the platelet surface and to elicit conformational changes in the integrin alpha IIbbeta 3 (21). Together, these data provide strong evidence that the association of SHP-2 with PECAM-1 is not merely an in vitro phenomenon, but occurs in vivo during the platelet aggregation process.


Fig. 4. Interaction of SHP-2 with full-length platelet PECAM-1. Platelets (1 × 109/ml) were incubated at 37 °C and stimulated with the following agonists in the presence of 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, and 100 µg/ml fibrinogen: 1) buffer (stirred); 2) 7 µM TRAP for 10 min, without stirring; 3) 7 µM TRAP for 5 min (stirred and aggregated); 4) 7 µM TRAP (stirred) in the presence of 0.5 mM RGDW peptide; 5) 10 µg/ml normal mouse (NM) F(ab')2 fragments for 30 min (stirred); and 6) 10 µg/ml PECAM-1.2 F(ab')2 fragments for 30 min (stirred). Following detergent lysis, immunoprecipitations (IP) were performed using either normal mouse IgG1 (left panel) or PECAM-1.3 (right panel). Bound proteins were resolved by 12.5% SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting using anti-SHP-2. The relative intensities of the SHP-2 band were determined densitometrically using an AMBIS scanner and are indicated at the bottom of the gel. Note that the association of SHP-2 with PECAM-1 was increased slightly when platelets were activated by TRAP or when PECAM-1 on the cell surface was cross-linked using the monoclonal antibody PECAM-1.2. PECAM-1/SHP-2 interaction increased approximately 9-fold in fully aggregated platelets.
[View Larger Version of this Image (50K GIF file)]



Fig. 5. Interaction of SHP-2 with platelet PECAM-1 is mediated by its SH2 domains. Washed platelets (1 × 109) were incubated at 37 °C for 5 min in 1 ml of Ringer citrate/dextrose buffer, pH 7.4, together with 1 µg of recombinant GST alone (lanes 1-4) or a GST fusion protein containing both SH2 domains of SHP-2 (lanes 5-8) and then stimulated with the indicated agonist in the presence or absence of RGDW peptide. Following detergent lysis, GST fusion proteins were captured with glutathione-agarose beads, separated on a 10% SDS gel, and analyzed by immunoblotting using either an anti-PECAM-1 antibody (top panel) or an antibody specific for N-terminal SH2 domain of SHP-2 (bottom panel) to demonstrate equivalent antigen load. Note that whereas the recombinant GST protein failed to bind PECAM-1, the GST fusion protein containing the SH2 domains of SHP-2 interacted specifically with full-length PECAM-1 derived from TRAP-aggregated human platelets (lane 7). Stds, standards.
[View Larger Version of this Image (39K GIF file)]



DISCUSSION

There is increasing evidence to suggest that, following interaction with the extracellular matrix or with other cells, cell-surface adhesion receptors may be capable of transmitting signals across the plasma membrane. For example, cross-linking of certain integrins with antibodies or adhesion of cells to specific integrin ligands can stimulate tyrosine phosphorylation of multiple cytosolic components, increase cytoplasmic pH and ionized calcium, initiate phosphoinositide synthesis, and modify patterns of gene expression (22-24). Integrins do not contain intrinsic kinase or phosphatase activity within their cytoplasmic domains, nor do they harbor SH2 or SH3 domains that could serve to recruit signaling molecules following ligand binding. Studies suggest, rather, that outside-in signaling events may be brokered by the accumulation and assembly of specific cytoskeletal (25) and signaling (26-28) molecules at sites of integrin clustering. The molecular basis underlying at least some of these interactions has recently been suggested by the work of Law et al. (29), who showed that the beta 3-subunit of the integrin alpha IIbbeta 3 becomes tyrosine-phosphorylated in response to thrombin-induced platelet aggregation, creating potential docking sites for the SH2-containing adapter proteins Grb2 and Shc.

This mode of signal transduction may represent a general paradigm that is used by PECAM-1 as well. Although the cytoplasmic domain of PECAM-1 lacks demonstrated catalytic activity, it contains numerous potential sites for phosphorylation of serine, threonine, and tyrosine residues (30). We found that PECAM-1, like the integrin beta 3-subunit, becomes tyrosine-phosphorylated during the platelet aggregation process (Fig. 1). Once "activated" by tyrosine phosphorylation, PECAM-1 associated with the 70-kDa protein-tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2 (Figs. 2 and 4). SHP-2 (also known as SHPTP-2, Syp, PTP1D, PTP2C, and SH-PTP3 (31)) is a ubiquitously expressed protein-tyrosine phosphatase that is composed of two SH2 domains in the amino-terminal third of the protein, followed by a catalytic phosphatase domain and a 76-amino acid carboxyl terminus that can become phosphorylated by receptor tyrosine kinases (32-35). Previous studies have shown that the SH2 domains of SHP-2 direct its interaction with the cytoplasmic domains of a number of tyrosine-phosphorylated (i.e. activated) growth factor receptors, including the platelet-derived growth factor receptor (34-36), the epidermal growth factor receptor (34, 35, 37), p145c-Kit (35), and HER2-neu (35). SHP-2 has also been linked to the insulin signal transduction pathway through its association with insulin receptor substrate-1 (36). SHP-2 signaling has not, however, previously been linked to cell adhesion. Thus, our finding that tyrosine-phosphorylated PECAM-1 serves as a docking site for the SH2 domains of SHP-2 in activated human platelets (Figs. 3, 4, 5) provides the first evidence that SHP-2 may also propagate transmembrane signals that emanate from cell/cell interactions.

SHP-2 has been shown to associate through its SH2 domains with the activated platelet-derived growth factor receptor at Tyr(P)1009 (38, 39). The sequence specificity for this interaction has been examined in great detail (40-42), and studies to date indicate that the sequence recognition elements surrounding the Tyr(P) residue that are required for high affinity binding of the N-terminal SH2 domain of SHP-2 include Val at position -2, a beta -branched residue (Thr/Val/Ile) at position +1, and a hydrophobic residue (Val/Leu/Ile) at position +3. Of the five tyrosine residues found within the cytoplasmic domain of PECAM-1, only the two encoded by exons 13 and 14, with the sequences VQpY663TEV and TVpY686SEV, fulfill these requirements. Sequence alignment of each of these sequences among various species (Fig. 6) reveals absolute conservation of the four key residues surrounding PECAM-1 Tyr663 that constitute the SHP-2-binding motif. The residues surrounding Tyr686, however, only loosely conform to the consensus sequence, suggesting that the C-terminal site on the PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain may constitute only a low affinity binding site for SHP-2. It should be pointed out that while we have shown that tyrosine-phosphorylated peptides encompassing residues 658-668 and 681-691 of the PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain bind SHP-2 (Figs. 2 and 3) and that SHP-2 binds tyrosine-phosphorylated PECAM-1 (Figs. 4 and 5), further studies employing mutant forms of PECAM-1 will be required to determine the binding site on PECAM-1 for SHP-2 in vivo. In this regard, it is notable that deletion of exon 14 results in the loss of the ability of PECAM-1-transfected fibroblasts to bind PECAM-1-negative cells (7, 20, 43), a function that we attribute to loss of PECAM-1-mediated signal transduction (see below). Whether Tyr686 becomes phosphorylated and acts synergistically with Tyr663 to localize SHP-2 to activated PECAM-1 or whether it serves as an independent docking site for the recruitment of additional signaling molecules is the subject of current investigation in our laboratory.


Fig. 6. Evolutionary conservation of the SHP-2-binding motifs in PECAM-1. The region of the cytoplasmic domain corresponding to amino acids 659-691 is shown and contains tyrosines 663 and 686 (boldface italic), which, when phosphorylated, likely serve as intracellular targets for the SH2 domains of the protein-tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2 (depicted schematically below the PECAM-1 sequence). Conserved residues surrounding the tyrosines likely involved in SHP-2 binding are boxed, and the consensus motif for binding of the SH2 domains of SHP-2 is shown immediately below. Note the strong sequence similarity between PECAM-1-(659-668) and amino acids 1005-1014 of the cytoplasmic domain of the beta -subunit of the human platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFRbeta ), the latter of which has been shown to bind SHP-2 following receptor autophosphorylation (37, 38).
[View Larger Version of this Image (28K GIF file)]


The catalytic activity of SHP-2 can be regulated both by its physical interaction with activated (i.e. tyrosine-phosphorylated) receptor tyrosine kinases (39) as well as by receptor tyrosine kinase-mediated phosphorylation of SHP-2 itself (34, 35, 37). Unlike the platelet-derived growth factor receptor, which can both bind to and phosphorylate SHP-2, PECAM-1 is incapable of phosphorylating SHP-2 at its carboxyl terminus following their interaction. Preliminary studies suggest, however, that PECAM-1 might be able to directly activate SHP-2 by virtue of its binding, as tyrosine-phosphorylated peptides comprising PECAM-1-(658-668) and PECAM-1-(681-691) stimulate the phosphatase activity of SHP-2.2 One scenario whereby PECAM-1 might initiate cellular signaling, therefore, might take advantage of its ability to localize SHP-2 to the inner face of the plasma membrane and activate it, thereby bringing the phosphatase into proximity with nearby phosphorylated signaling molecules. One particularly attractive set of substrates for SHP-2 may be protein-tyrosine kinases, such as pp60src, which are constitutively bound to the membrane via post-translationally added fatty acid side chains and which normally exist in an inactive state due to intramolecular interactions with a negative regulatory phosphotyrosine residue (44). Whether PECAM-1/SHP-2 interactions promote cellular signaling by dephosphorylating Src family kinases is not yet known.

SHP-2 has the capacity to be a multifunctional signaling molecule. C-terminal to its phosphatase domain, human SHP-2 contains three tyrosine residues, and the sequence around two of these (Y542TNI and Y580ENV), when tyrosine-phosphorylated, conforms to the consensus binding site for the SH2 domain of the adapter protein Grb2 (40). In fact, tyrosine phosphorylation of SHP-2 induced by platelet-derived growth factor (45, 46), interleukin-3 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (47), and steel factor (48) has been shown to result in the direct binding of Grb2 in vivo. Since Grb2 normally exists bound, via its SH3 domains, to the guanine nucleotide-releasing factor Sos (49-56), it has been proposed that SHP-2 functions as an adapter protein, linking the activation of these transmembrane growth factor and cytokine receptors to the Ras signaling pathway in hematopoietic cells. In addition, Welham et al. (47) have found that SHP-2 coprecipitates with the p85 subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase, although the molecular nature of this interaction is not well understood. Whether SHP-2 integrates signals that derive from PECAM-1 homophilic interactions with either the Ras or phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase pathway in platelets and other vascular cells remains to be determined.

In resting platelets, the majority of PECAM-1 molecules are either free within the plane of the membrane or associated with the underlying membrane skeleton (13). During platelet aggregation, however, >50% of PECAM-1 receptors become associated with the actin cytoskeleton. In contrast, SHP-2 exists either free in the cytosol or associated with the membrane skeleton, with virtually none becoming attached to the cytoskeleton in activated human platelets (57). In our studies (Fig. 4), we found that SHP-2 became associated with PECAM-1 present in the 15,000 × g supernatant of activated, detergent-solubilized platelets, i.e. those PECAM-1 receptors that were either linked to the membrane skeleton or free within the plane of the membrane. While we have not yet determined the stoichiometry of SHP-2:PECAM-1 in any of these subcellular fractions, it is tempting to speculate that a subpopulation of PECAM-1, perhaps attached to the membrane skeleton of human platelets, serves a unique functional role in the assembly of signaling complexes during the alpha IIbbeta 3-mediated platelet aggregation process. Two other nontransmembrane protein-tyrosine phosphatases present in platelets, PTP1B and SHP-1, have been found to be associated with the 15,000 × g detergent-insoluble cytoskeleton during platelet aggregation, where they are thought to participate in the dephosphorylation of tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins that have become associated within the cytoskeleton (57). However, we have found no evidence for their association with the cytoplasmic domain of PECAM-1 to date.

Finally, we predict that bidirectional signaling through PECAM-1 may be of functional importance in other vascular cells. We have shown that PECAM-1 can function downstream from integrin engagement, as tyrosine phosphorylation of PECAM-1 and its subsequent association with SHP-2 are each dependent upon prior integrin-mediated platelet/platelet contact (Figs. 1 and 4). The relationship between PECAM-1- and integrin-mediated signaling, however, appears to be able to work in both directions. The ability of PECAM-1, upon its engagement, to serve as an amplifier of integrin-mediated cell adhesion (8-12) provides one cogent series of examples in which PECAM-1 functions upstream of integrins, serving primarily as an agonist receptor rather than as a cell adhesion molecule per se. "PECAM-1-mediated" binding to the integrin alpha vbeta 3 of lymphokine-activated killer cells (58) and monocyte-like U937 cells (59) and the interaction of PECAM-1-transfected L-cells with PECAM-1-negative murine L-cell fibroblasts (60, 61) may represent additional examples of adhesive interactions that are enabled by outside-in signal transduction through PECAM-1. This process may be relevant to both inflammation and thrombosis during the process of selectin-mediated leukocyte (62) and platelet (63) rolling on activated endothelium. Homophilic interactions between PECAM-1 located at endothelial cell intercellular junctions and either platelet or leukocyte PECAM-1 might act in concert with selectin-mediated signaling to promote integrin activation and subsequent tight adhesion necessary for transendothelial migration. Whether the anti-inflammatory effects of anti-PECAM-1 antibodies observed in a number of in vitro (4) and in vivo (64, 65) models are due, in part, to inhibition of PECAM-1-mediated outside-in signaling remains to be determined. Further studies aimed at identifying the mechanisms by which PECAM-1/SHP-2 interactions broker these events and the signaling molecules that participate in these complex cellular processes should shed additional light on the role of the cell adhesion and cell signaling molecule PECAM-1 in vascular cell biology.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by Grants HL-44612 and HL-40926 (to P. J. N.) from the National Institutes of Health and Grants 96F-Post-34 (to D. E. J.), 96F-Post-49 (to C. M. W.), and 95F-Pre-16 (to R. W.) from the American Heart Association, Wisconsin Affiliate. This work was presented in abstract form at the 38th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Orlando, FL, December 6-10, 1996.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
   Established Investigator of the American Heart Association. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Blood Research Inst., The Blood Center of Southeastern Wisconsin, 638 N. 18th St., Milwaukee, WI 53233-2121. Tel.: 414-937-6237; Fax: 414-937-6284.
1   The abbreviations used are: PECAM-1, platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1; SH2, Src homology 2; GST, glutathione S-transferase; TEMED, N,N,N',N'-tetramethylethylenediamine; TRAP,thrombin receptor-activating peptide; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; Fmoc, N-(9-fluorenyl)methoxycarbonyl.
2   D. E. Jackson and P. J. Newman, unpublished observations.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Drs. James Augustine and Cheryl Hillery for helpful discussions and to Norman Mermelstein for technical advice. We also thank Trudy M. Holyst for expert assistance in the design and production of PECAM phosphopeptides. Dr. Mark Zukowski and Barbara Karin-Tamir (Amgen Corp.) generously provided the amino acid sequence of rat PECAM-1 prior to its publication.


REFERENCES

  1. DeLisser, H. M., Newman, P. J., and Albelda, S. M. (1994) Immunol. Today 15, 490-495 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Newman, P. J. (1994) in Platelet-dependent Vascular Occlusion (Fitzgerald, G. A., Jennings, L. K., and Patrono, C., eds), pp. 165-174, New York Academy of Sciences, New York
  3. Schimmenti, L. A., Yan, H.-C., Madri, J. A., and Albelda, S. M. (1992) J. Cell. Physiol. 153, 417-428 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Muller, W. A., Weigl, S. A., Deng, X., and Phillips, D. M. (1993) J. Exp. Med. 178, 449-460 [Abstract]
  5. Bogen, S. A., Baldwin, H. S., Watkins, S. C., Albelda, S. M., and Abbas, A. K. (1992) Am. J. Pathol. 141, 843-854 [Abstract]
  6. Sun, Q., DeLisser, H. M., Zukowski, M. M., Paddock, C., Albelda, S. M., and Newman, P. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 11090-11098 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Sun, J., Williams, J., Yan, H.-C., Amin, K. M., Albelda, S. M., and DeLisser, H. M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 18561-18570 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Tanaka, Y., Albelda, S. M., Horgan, K. J., Van Seventer, G. A., Shimizu, Y., Newman, W., Hallam, J., Newman, P. J., Buck, C. A., and Shaw, S. (1992) J. Exp. Med. 176, 245-253 [Abstract]
  9. Piali, L., Albelda, S. M., Baldwin, H. S., Hammel, P., Gisler, R. H., and Imhof, B. A. (1993) Eur. J. Immunol. 23, 2464-2471 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Leavesley, D. I., Oliver, J. M., Swart, B. W., Berndt, M. C., Haylock, D. N., and Simmons, P. J. (1994) J. Immunol. 153, 4673-4683 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Berman, M. E., and Muller, W. A. (1995) J. Immunol. 154, 299-307 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Berman, M. E., Xie, Y., and Muller, W. A. (1996) J. Immunol. 156, 1515-1524 [Abstract]
  13. Newman, P. J., Hillery, C. A., Albrecht, R., Parise, L. V., Berndt, M. C., Mazurov, A. V., Dunlop, L. C., Zhang, J., and Rittenhouse, S. E. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 119, 239-246 [Abstract]
  14. Zehnder, J. L., Hirai, K., Shatsky, M., McGregor, J. L., Levitt, L. J., and Leung, L. L. K. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 5243-5249 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Modderman, P. W., von dem Borne, A. E. G. K., and Sonnenberg, A. (1994) Biochem. J. 299, 613-621 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Jackson, D. E., Poncz, M., Holyst, M. T., and Newman, P. J. (1996) Eur. J. Biochem. 240, 280-287 [Abstract]
  17. Kamps, M. P., and Sefton, B. M. (1989) Anal. Biochem. 176, 22-27 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Kirschbaum, N. E., Gumina, R. J., and Newman, P. J. (1994) Blood 84, 4028-4037 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Baldwin, H. S., Shen, H. M., Yan, H.-C., DeLisser, H. M., Chung, A., Mickanin, C., Trask, T., Kirschbaum, N., Newman, P. J., Albelda, S. M., and Buck, C. A. (1994) Development (Camb.) 120, 2539-2553 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. DeLisser, H. M., Chilkotowsky, J., Yan, H.-C., Daise, M., Buck, C. A., and Albelda, S. M. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 124, 195-203 [Abstract]
  21. Varon, D., Shenkman, B., Dardik, R., Tamarin, I., Savion, N., Jackson, D., and Newman, P. J. (1996) Tissue Antigens 48, 469 (abstr.)
  22. Juliano, R. L., and Haskill, S. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 120, 577-585 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Shattil, S. J., Ginsberg, M. H., and Brugge, J. S. (1994) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 6, 695-704 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Yamada, K. M., and Miyamoto, S. (1995) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7, 681-689 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Miyamoto, S., Akiyama, S. K., and Yamada, K. M. (1995) Science 267, 883-885 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Schlaepfer, D. D., Hanks, S. K., Hunter, T., and vanderGeer, P. (1994) Nature 372, 786-791 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Miyamoto, S., Teramoto, H., Coso, O. A., Gutkind, J. S., Burbelo, P. D., Akiyama, S. K., and Yamada, K. M. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 131, 791-805 [Abstract]
  28. Shattil, S. J., O'Toole, T. E., Eigenthaler, M., Thon, V., Williams, M., Babior, B. M., and Ginsberg, M. H. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 131, 807-816 [Abstract]
  29. Law, D. A., Nannizzi-Alaimo, L., and Phillips, D. R. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 10811-10815 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Newman, P. J., Berndt, M. C., Gorski, J., White, G. C., Lyman, S., Paddock, C., and Muller, W. A. (1990) Science 247, 1219-1222 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Adachi, M., Fischer, E., Ihle, J., Imai, K., Jirik, F., Neel, B., Pawson, T., Shen, S.-H., Thomas, M., Ullrich, A., and Zhao, Z. (1996) Cell 85, 15 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Freeman, R. M., Plutzky, J., and Neel, B. G. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 11239-11243 [Abstract]
  33. Ahmad, S., Banville, D., Zhao, Z., Fischer, E. H., and Shen, S.-H. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 2197-2201 [Abstract]
  34. Feng, G.-S., Hui, C.-C., and Pawson, T. (1993) Science 259, 1607-1610 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Vogel, W., Lammers, R., Huang, J., and Ullrich, A. (1993) Science 259, 1611-1614 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Kuhne, M. R., Pawson, A., Leinhard, G. E., and Feng, G.-S. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 11479-11481 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Lechleider, R. J., Freeman, R. M., Jr., and Neel, B. G. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 13434-13438 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Kazlauskas, A., Feng, G.-S., Pawson, T., and Valius, M. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 6939-6943 [Abstract]
  39. Lechleider, R. J., Sugimoto, S., Bennett, A. M., Kashishian, A. S., Cooper, J. A., Shoelson, S. E., Walsh, C. T., and Neel, B. G. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 21478-21481 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Songyang, Z., Shoelson, S. E., Chaudhuri, M., Gish, G., Pawson, T., Haser, W. G., King, F., Roberts, T., Ratnofsky, S., Lechleider, R. J., Neel, B. G., Birge, R. B., Fajardo, J. E., Chou, M. M., Hanafusa, H., Schaffhausen, B., and Cantley, L. C. (1993) Cell 72, 767-778 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Case, R. D., Piccione, E., Wolf, G., Benett, A. M., Lechleider, R. J., Neel, B. G., and Shoelson, S. E. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 10467-10474 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Huyer, G., Li, Z. M., Adam, M., Huckle, W. R., and Ramachandran, C. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 1040-1049 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Yan, H.-C., Baldwin, H. S., Sun, J., Buck, C. A., Albelda, S. M., and DeLisser, H. M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 23672-23680 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Clark, E. A., Shattil, S. J., and Brugge, J. S. (1994) Trends Biochem. Sci. 19, 464-469 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Li, W., Nishimura, R., Kashishian, A., Batzer, A. G., Kim, W. J. H., Cooper, J. A., and Schlessinger, J. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 509-517 [Abstract]
  46. Bennett, A. M., Tang, T. L., Sugimoto, S., Walsh, C. T., and Neel, B. G. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 7335-7339 [Abstract]
  47. Welham, M. J., Dechert, U., Leslie, K. B., Jirik, F., and Schrader, J. W. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 23764-23768 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Tauchi, T., Feng, G.-S., Marshall, M. S., Shen, R., Mantel, C., Pawson, T., and Broxmeyer, H. E. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 25206-25211 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Buday, L., and Downward, J. (1993) Cell 73, 611-620 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Chardin, P., Camonis, J., Gale, W. L., Van Aelst, L., and Schlessinger, J. (1993) Science 260, 1338-1343 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  51. Egan, S. E., Giddings, B. W., Brooks, M. W., Buday, L., Sizeland, A. M., and Weinberg, R. (1993) Nature 363, 45-51 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  52. Gale, W. N., Kaplan, D., Lowenstein, E. J., Schlessinger, J., and Bar-Sagi, D. (1993) Nature 363, 88-92 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  53. Li, N., Batzer, A., Daly, R., Yajnik, V., Skolnik, P., Chardin, P., Bar-Sagi, D., Margolis, B., and Schlessinger, J. (1993) Nature 363, 85-88 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  54. Olivier, J. P., Raabe, T., Henkemyer, M., Dickson, B., Mbamalu, G., Margolis, B., Schlessinger, J., Hafen, E., and Pawson, T. (1993) Cell 73, 179-191 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  55. Rozakis-Adcock, M., Fernley, R., Wade, S., Pawson, T., and Bowtell, D. (1993) Nature 363, 83-85 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. Simon, M. A., Dodson, G. S., and Rubin, G. M. (1993) Cell 73, 169-177 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  57. Ezumi, Y., Takayama, H., and Okuma, M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 11927-11934 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Piali, L., Hammel, P., Uherek, C., Bachmann, F., Gisler, R. H., Dunon, D., and Imhof, B. A. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 130, 451-460 [Abstract]
  59. Buckley, C. D., Doyonnas, R., Newton, J. P., Blystone, S. D., Brown, E. J., Watt, S. M., and Simmons, D. L. (1996) J. Cell Sci. 109, 437-445 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Muller, W. A., Berman, M. E., Newman, P. J., DeLisser, H. M., and Albelda, S. M. (1992) J. Exp. Med. 175, 1401-1404 [Abstract]
  61. DeLisser, H. M., Yan, H.-C., Newman, P. J., Muller, W. A., Buck, C. A., and Albelda, S. M. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 16037-16046 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Lawrence, M. B., and Springer, T. A. (1991) Cell 65, 859-873 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  63. Frenette, P. S., Johnson, R. C., Hynes, R. O., and Wagner, D. D. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 7450-7454 [Abstract]
  64. Vaporciyan, A. A., DeLisser, H. M., Yan, H.-C., Mendiguren, I. I., Thom, S. R., Jones, M. L., Ward, P. A., and Albelda, S. M. (1993) Science 262, 1580-1582 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  65. Bogen, S., Pak, J., Garifallou, M., Deng, X., and Muller, W. A. (1994) J. Exp. Med. 179, 1059-1064 [Abstract]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.