acrB Mutation Located at Carboxyl-terminal Region of Gyrase B Subunit Reduces DNA Binding of DNA Gyrase*

(Received for publication, December 16, 1996)

Kenzo Funatsuki Dagger §, Reiji Tanaka Dagger , Shuichiro Inagaki Dagger , Haruyoshi Konno , Kenji Katoh Dagger and Hakobu Nakamura par

From Dagger  Aburahi Laboratories, Shionogi and Company, Ltd., Koka, Shiga 520-34, the  Research Institute for Bioresources, Okayama University, Kurashiki, Okayama 710, and the par  Biological Institute, Faculty of Science, Konan University, Higashinada, Kobe 658, Japan

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Mutations that exhibit susceptibility to acriflavine have been isolated and classified as acr mutations in Escherichia coli. We cloned the acrB gene, which has been identified as a mutation of the gyrB gene, and found a double point mutation altering two consecutive amino acids (S759R/R760C) in the COOH-terminal region of the gyrase B subunit. The mutant B subunit was found to associate with the A subunit to make the quaternary structure, and the reconstituted gyrase showed an 80-fold reduction of specific activity in DNA supercoiling assay; the sensitivity to acriflavine was not different in the same unit of wild-type and mutant gyrases. The mutant enzyme retained intrinsic ATPase activity, but DNA-dependent stimulation was observed infrequently. A gel shift assay showed that acriflavine inhibited the DNA binding of gyrase. The acrB mutation also reduced significantly the DNA binding of gyrase but did not change the sensitivity to acriflavine. These results revealed that the acrB mutation is related to the inhibitory mechanism of acriflavine; and the acriflavine sensitivity of the mutant, at least in vitro, is caused mainly by reduction of the enzyme activity. Further, our findings suggest that the COOH-terminal region of the B subunit is essential for the initial binding of gyrase to the substrate DNA.


INTRODUCTION

Acriflavine is an acridine dye that causes inhibition of cell division in microorganisms, plasmid loss of bacterial cells, and high mutation frequencies. The mutagenic activity of acridine dyes results mainly in frameshift mutation, which is derived from insertion or deletion of base(s) in the DNA (1). Although acriflavine is known as an antibiotic agent, almost all Escherichia coli K12 wild-type strains exhibit resistance to this reagent. For investigation of determinants in acriflavine resistance, five acridine-sensitive mutants have been isolated: acrA (2), acrB (3), acrC and acrD (4), and acrE (5).

The acrA mutant is highly cross-sensitive with membrane-attackable substances such as phenethyl alcohol, detergents, and some fatty acids (6, 7). The cloned acrA+ gene showed a gene dosage effect in E. coli (8). Sequence analysis revealed an operon encoding two membrane protein genes acrA and acrE (this is not the same gene described above) (9). This acrAE operon is homologous to the envCD operon mutant, which is also hypersusceptible to basic dyes, detergents, and antibiotics (10). These genes are deduced to be subunits of energy-dependent pump proteins.

Mutations at the acrA locus also occurred in response to deletion of topA, which encodes topoisomerase I (11). These mutations help the survival of Delta topA strains under specific growth conditions. Deletion of topA is deleterious to E. coli, and several compensatory mutations have also been mapped to gyrA or gyrB (11). Although the relationship between acrA and the superhelicity of genome DNA has not been elucidated clearly yet, it is interesting that the acrB gene has been demonstrated to fall into the same cistron of gyrB (12); in the genetic map of the E. coli chromosome, acrB is designated in the locus of gyrB (13). These lines of evidence suggest that gyrase is at least one of the target proteins of acriflavine.

The DNA gyrase of E. coli consists of two A subunits (Mr = 105,000, gene gyrA) and two B subunits (Mr = 95,000, gene gyrB) to form a tetramer. This enzyme catalyzes the reaction of supercoiling-relaxation, knotting-unknotting, and catenation-decatenation for DNA strands in the presence of ATP and divalent metal ions (14-17). The A subunit contains the active site for DNA breakage and reunion, and it forms a homodimer in the absence of the B subunit that does not make a dimer conformation itself (18). The B subunit has an ATPase domain (NH2-terminal region), the structure of which has been demonstrated crystallographically (19). The B subunit that lacks the NH2-terminal ATPase domain, named nu  protein, still shows DNA relaxing activity (20, 21). Therefore, this region is thought to contain all of the functional domains in the B subunit for establishing topoisomerase activity. The mechanisms of the precise parts of this protein, however, have not been elucidated yet.

Here we report the cloning and characterization of the acrB mutation located in the COOH-terminal region. The results suggest that this region contributes to the DNA binding of gyrase.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

E. coli Strains and Plasmids

Wild-type strain W1895 (metB, gyrA+, gyrB+, acriflaviner) and acrB strain N2879 (acriflavines mutant derived from W1895) were used in the acriflavine resistance test (3). The plasmid pJB11, which has 3.4-kilobase fragment containing the gyrB gene (22), was kindly provided by Dr. A. Hase (Osaka City Research Institute of Public Health and Environmental Science). Expression vector pGEX4T-3 was purchased from Pharmacia Biotech Inc. pBluescript II (KS+) was from Stratagene.

Media, Chemicals, and Enzymes

PGY medium-concentrated (1% Polypeptone (Difco Laboratories), 0.3% yeast extract, 0.3% NaCl, 0.1% glucose, adjusted pH 7.4) and PGY medium-dilute (0.5% Polypeptone, 0.1% yeast extract, 0.3% NaCl, 0.1% glucose, adjusted pH 8.0) were used for the acriflavine sensitivity test. Other media were constructed as described in Ref. 23. Restriction enzymes were from Takara Shuzo (Japan), the glutathione S-transferase gene fusion system was from Pharmacia, and oligonucleotides were from Biologica (Japan).

Cloning of the gyrB(acrB) Gene

Genomic DNA was purified from E. coli strain N2879 as described by Cosloy and Oishi (24). The DNA library was constructed with the pBluescript II (KS+) plasmid, and the gyrB(acrB) gene was screened by colony hybridization using a wild-type gyrB gene as a probe. The DNA fragment was labeled with the ECL system (Amersham Corp.). The gyrA gene was cloned from strain W1895 by polymerase chain reaction using Vent DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs). DNA sequencing was performed using Sequenase version 2.0 (U. S. Biochemical Corp.)

Enzyme Purification

gyrA, gyrB, and gyrB(acrB) gene products were purified by the protocol of the glutathione S-transferase fusion protein system, DEAE-Sepharose column (25), and a Novobiocin-Sepharose column (26).

Each plasmid for overexpression of the gyrase subunit was constructed using the expression vector pGEX4T-3 (Pharmacia). In the expression plasmid for the gyrA gene, an arginine codon AGA at the 6th codon, which is a rare codon in E. coli, was replaced by CGT. All of the gyrase genes were inserted in the site of BamHI (NH2 terminus) and XhoI (COOH terminus) of the vector; each gene product is expected to have two extra amino acids upstream of the first methionine after the thrombin cleavage. The transformed cells were inoculated into 2.5 liters of 2 × YT medium and incubated at 30 °C with vigorous shaking until A600 reached at 0.5. Expression of the fusion gene was induced by addition of isopropyl beta -D-thiogalactopyranoside to 0.1 mM. After 30 min (15 min for B subunits), the culture was cooled down rapidly on ice, and cells were harvested. Further incubation caused a formation of an inclusion body that was hardly solubilized. The procedure of the glutathione-Sepharose column was essentially as described in manufacturer's protocol (Pharmacia). We used phosphate-buffered saline containing 10% glycerol, 5 mM DTT1 and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride for column washing, thrombin cleavage. and protein elution.

To purify the B subunit, the eluate from the glutathione-Sepharose column was dialyzed overnight against 3 liters of TGED buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 5 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 5 mM DTT, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) containing 0.12 M NaCl and loaded onto a DEAE-Sepharose (type DE52, Whatman) column (12-ml bed volume) previously equilibrated with the same buffer. The flow-through fraction was collected and subjected to the Novobiocin column procedure. To obtain the A subunit, the DEAE column procedure was skipped.

The sample was dialyzed overnight against 3 liters of HEPES buffer (25 mM HEPES, pH 8.0, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM DTT, 10% ethylene glycol) and loaded onto a Novobiocin affinity column (50-ml bed volume) equilibrated with the same buffer. To obtain the A subunit, the flow-through fraction was collected. For elution, HEPES buffer containing 5 M urea was used to obtain the wild-type B subunit and HEPES buffer containing 7 M urea for the acrB mutant subunit.

Finally, these samples were dialyzed overnight against 3 liters of TGED buffer without NaCl, concentrated by Centricon (Amicon), and stored at -80 °C.

Supercoiling Assay

Relaxed pBluescript plasmid DNA was prepared by topoisomerase I enzyme from rat liver (27). Gyrase enzyme was reconstituted in 30 µl of reconstitution buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 0.2 mM EDTA, 70 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM DTT, 360 µg/ml BSA, 20% glycerol) with purified A and B subunits (7.5 µg each). The supercoiling assay was performed in 60 µl of the reaction mixture containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 20 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM DTT, 1.5 mM ATP, 5 mM spermidine, 50 µg/ml BSA, 500 µg/ml tRNA, 10% glycerol, 1 µg of relaxed pBluescript DNA, and various amounts of reconstituted gyrase. Samples were incubated at 30 °C for 30 min, then extracted with phenol solution and chloroform:isoamyl alcohol solution twice, respectively. DNA was recovered by ethanol precipitation, dissolved in TE (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA), and subjected to 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis. One unit of enzyme activity of gyrase was defined as the amount that brought 50% of relaxed DNA to the supercoiled position in agarose gel electrophoresis.

ATPase Assay

The reaction mixture (100 µl) contained 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 20 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 50 µg/ml BSA, 1 µg of gyrase, and various concentrations of ATP with or without 2.5 µg of relaxed pBluescript II (KS+) DNA. The mixtures were incubated at 30 °C for 10 min. The amount of generated ADP was measured by high performance liquid chromatography as described by Taylor et al. (28).

Gel Shift Assay

The gyrase cleavage site of pBR322 (29) (base position 886-1089) was amplified by polymerase chain reaction and subcloned into pBluescript. The isolated DNA fragment was labeled with [gamma -32P]ATP by T4 polynucleotide kinase. The binding reaction was performed with the method of Bachellier et al. (30) with modifications. Gyrase was reconstructed with 5.0 µg of A and B subunit, respectively, in 20 µl of the reconstitution buffer described above. Half of the reconstituted gyrase (10 µl) was added to 10 ml of 2 × binding buffer (80 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 12 mM MgCl2, 40 mM KCl, 4 mM DTT, 20 mM ATP) containing 300 pg of labeled DNA and 25 ng of double stranded competitor DNA (poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC), Sigma). Subsequently, samples were incubated at 25 °C for 60 min. Polyacrylamide gel (multigel 2-15% gradient, Daiichi-kagaku Co. Ltd.) was used, and prerunning was done with 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.4, 192 mM glycine, 8 mM MgCl2 at 90-V constant voltage for 3 h at 4 °C. Protein-bound and free DNA were separated electrophoretically with new buffer at 90-V constant voltage for 4 h at 4 °C. Gels were dried and contacted to the x-ray film. To quantitate the gyrase-DNA complex, a gel containing the complex was excised, and the radioactivity was counted by the Cerenkov method.


RESULTS

Identification of the acrB Mutation in the gyrB Gene

Using the gyrB(wild) gene as a probe, we isolated the gyrB(acrB) gene from N2879 strain. The nucleotide sequences of the gyrB(acrB) gene revealed two nucleotide substitutions. The 2275th A from the translation start was substituted for C by transversion, and 2278th C was substituted for T by transition. These point mutations alter amino acids in the B subunit: Ser759 right-arrow Arg and Arg760 right-arrow Cys. These mutations were located at the COOH-terminal region of the gyrB gene (Fig. 1). The nucleotide sequence of the other part was identical to the reported gyrB sequence (31).


Fig. 1. A scheme of the domain structure of E. coli gyrase B subunit and the acrB mutation site. The ATPase domain boundary is defined by preferred trypsin cleavage site (Arg393) (41). The black box region shows the inserted amino acid sequence that is not found in B. subtilis gyrase and eukaryotic topoisomerase; and the boundary region is taken from Wyckoff et al. (42). The domain designated by Q contains mutation sites of quinolone-resistant genes (Asp426, Lys447, denoted by arrow) and the region of conserved amino acid motifs which is denoted by the horizontally hatched box: EGDSA (424-428), PL(R/K)GK(I/L/M)LN (445-452), IM(T/A)D(JQ/A)D (495-500). The COOH-terminal region neighboring the inserted sequence designated as C-TERM (see "Discussion"). The mutation sites of acrB are in the C-TERM region: Ser759 and Arg760 (this paper). The expected A subunit association region is indicated by the cross-hatched box (see "Discussion").
[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]

Effect of Acriflavine on the Growth of Wild-type and Mutant E. coli

The bacterial growth curves in the presence of 20 µg/ml acriflavine are shown in Fig. 2. Wild-type strain (W1895) showed continuous growth without time lag. The wild-type cells carrying a high copy number of plasmids with wild-type gyrB (pJB11) or gyrB(acrB) (pSB1) had resistant features. However, the cells carrying pJB11 showed more intense growth than the cells without plasmid, whereas the cells carrying pSB1 showed a 2-h time lag for growth recovery. In the mutant strain (N2879), the cells without plasmid and with pSB1 did not show growth. On the contrary, mutant cells carrying pJB11 showed recovery of the survival after a 4-h decline. Such recovery after a limited time may result from the time lag for gyrB expression induced by decreased superhelicity of the genome DNA (32). The hypersensitivity to acriflavine in the N2879 strain has a complex feature that cannot be explained by the gene dosage effect alone. However, the semidominant character of the gyrB(acrB) gene, which would be caused by the stoichiometric effect of the gene product, is notable.


Fig. 2. The growth of E. coli in the presence of 20 µg/ml acriflavine. The bacterial cells were cultured in the PGY medium-concentrated for 18 h at 37 °C and washed three times with saline solution (0.8% NaCl) by centrifugation. The cells were diluted in the PGY medium-dilute (105 cells/ml) containing 20 µg/ml acriflavine (AF) and shaken for various duration. After washing with a saline solution, the cells were plated onto the PGY medium-concentrated to count viable cells. square , W1895 (wild-type strain); black-square, W1895 with pJB11(gyrB); black-triangle, W1895 with pSB1(gyrB(acrB)); open circle , N2879 (acrB mutant); bullet , N2879 with pJB11; triangle , N2879 with pSB1.
[View Larger Version of this Image (20K GIF file)]

Purifications of Gyrase Subunits

To analyze the gene product of acrB, each subunit of gyrase was overexpressed and purified using the glutathione S-transferase-fusion protocol. After the glutathione S-transferase column procedure, however, a small amount of the other partner of the subunit was still found in purification of both A and B subunits, and each sample exhibited supercoiling activity. Therefore, these glutathione S-transferase-fusion proteins seem to retain the ability to associate with the partner subunit even though they contain a large polypeptide of glutathione S-transferase in the NH2-terminal side. The copurified A and B subunits were absorbed and eliminated by a DEAE-Sepharose column and a Novobiocin affinity column, respectively. Absence of the partner subunit was confirmed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and supercoiling assay. About 10 mg of protein was obtained from a 2.5-liter culture in each case.

Supercoiling Activity

The supercoiling activity in vitro was detected from gyrase proteins reconstituted with both wild-type and the mutant B subunit. However, their specific activities were quite different. The specific activity of wild-type gyrase was calculated to be 3.2 × 106 units/mg of protein, and that of mutant gyrase was 4.0 × 104 units/mg. Therefore, the activity of gyrase was reduced 80-fold by acrB mutation.

We also examined the effect of acriflavine in the supercoiling reaction (Fig. 3). Acriflavine caused partial inhibition against 1 unit of gyrase at a concentration of 1 µg/ml and complete inhibition at 6 µg/ml. Against 100 units of gyrase, little inhibition was observed at 10 µg/ml. These findings were common to the wild-type and mutant gyrase. Thus, the sensitivity of the supercoiling activity to acriflavine was not affected by the mutation.


Fig. 3. Inhibitory effect of acriflavine on DNA supercoiling activity. Supercoiling assay was performed with 1, 10, and 100 units of reconstituted gyrase containing wild-type or mutant B subunit in the presence of various concentrations of acriflavine (AF). In the experiments of mutant gyrase, 80-fold higher amounts of the enzyme were used for the assays because of its reduced activity (see "Results"). R and S represent the positions of relaxed and supercoiled plasmids, respectively.
[View Larger Version of this Image (41K GIF file)]

Assembling of Gyrase Tetramers

We examined whether the mutant B subunit had lost the ability to associate with the A subunit. The molecular weight of the reconstituted mutant gyrase protein was estimated by a Superdex-200HR (Pharmacia) column, and the eluted proteins were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Fig. 4). Both wild-type gyrase and mutant gyrase were eluted at the same position with a molecular mass of 400 kDa, which corresponds to that of regular gyrase tetramer. SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis revealed an equal amount of gyrA and gyrB subunits. These results showed that the mutant B subunit was able to construct a gyrase tetramer, indicating that the lower supercoiling activity of the mutant gyrase was not due to the loss of the affinity with the A subunit.


Fig. 4. Estimation of subunit assembling. A subunit (15 µg) was mixed with 15 µg of wild-type or mutant B subunit in 100 µl of reconstitution buffer, as described under "Experimental Procedures," except for glycerol. After incubation for 30 min at 20 °C, the mixture was applied directly to a gel filtration column (Superdex-200HR, Pharmacia) which was equilibrated by reconstitution buffer without BSA and glycerol. The proteins in peak fractions were collected, concentrated, and analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The protein at the position of 66.2 kDa is BSA in the reconstitution mixture.
[View Larger Version of this Image (26K GIF file)]

ATPase Activity

The NH2-terminal region of the B subunit contains an ATPase domain. We examined the ATPase activity of wild-type and mutant gyrase (Fig. 5). In the absence of DNA, these enzymes showed a similar level of intrinsic ATPase activity. The Lineweaver-Burk plot indicated that both Km for ATP was 1.7 mM as reported (26). On the other hand, in the presence of DNA, the ATPase activity was quite different in the wild-type and mutant; the ATP hydrolysis of wild-type gyrase was significantly stimulated by DNA, whereas that of mutant gyrase was hardly stimulated.


Fig. 5. Intrinsic and DNA-dependent ATPase activity of wild-type and mutant gyrase. ATPase activity of wild-type (panel A) and mutant (panel B) gyrase was determined with various ATP concentrations. black-square, without DNA; square , with 2.5 µg of pBluescript DNA.
[View Larger Version of this Image (15K GIF file)]

Fig. 6 shows the inhibitory effect of acriflavine on ATPase activity. Although slight inhibition was observed under the conditions without DNA, the inhibitory effect was the most marked in the case of wild-type enzyme with DNA. In the case of both wild-type and mutant gyrase, the activity was reduced by the high concentration of acriflavine (>3 µg/ml) to the same level as the intrinsic ATPase activity. These results indicated that acriflavine specifically inhibited the DNA-dependent ATPase activity.


Fig. 6. Inhibitory effect of acriflavine on ATPase activity. Reaction mixtures were incubated with 1 µg of gyrase in the presence of 2 mM ATP and various amounts of acriflavine (AF). black-square, wild-type gyrase with DNA; bullet , wild-type gyrase without DNA; square , mutant gyrase with DNA; open circle , mutant gyrase without DNA.
[View Larger Version of this Image (13K GIF file)]

DNA Binding of Gyrase Proteins

We examined DNA binding of wild-type and mutant gyrases by gel shift assay. The wild-type gyrase showed notable binding to a 204-base pair DNA fragment containing the cleavage region of gyrase (29) (Fig. 7A). On the other hand, the gyrase with gyrB(acrB) subunit showed very little binding capacity (Fig. 7B). The extent of gyrase-DNA complex formation decreased as the concentration of acriflavine increased in the case of wild-type and mutant gyrase. Fifty percent inhibition of binding was observed at a similar concentration of the acriflavine (~20 µg/ml) in these experiments, indicating that the mutation did not change the sensitivity to acriflavine in DNA binding. Fig. 8 shows the DNA binding of gyrase under the competitive conditions of B subunits to associate with the A subunit. Various amounts of wild-type and mutant B subunits were mixed with constant amount of the A subunit, and the mixtures were subjected to the gel shift assay. With an increasing amount of the mutant B subunit, the amount of the gyrase-DNA complex decreased (Fig. 8A). On the other hand, an excess amount of wild-type B subunit did not inhibit DNA binding and rescued the defect of the mutant gyrase (Fig. 8B).


Fig. 7. Inhibitory effect of acriflavine on DNA binding. Gel shift assay was performed with wild-type (panel A) or mutant (panel B) B subunit and the binding buffer containing various concentrations of acriflavine (AF). Upper panels show the autoradiography of gel mobility shift assay. Lower panels show quantitative results from the radioactivity in DNA-gyrase complexes. Arrows indicate the positions of the DNA-gyrase complex.
[View Larger Version of this Image (37K GIF file)]


Fig. 8. Competitive effect of mutant and wild-type B subunit on DNA binding. A subunit (7.5 µg) was mixed with an equal amount (7.5 µg) of wild-type B subunit and various amounts of mutant B subunit (panel A) or mixed with an equal amount of mutant B subunit and various amounts of wild-type B subunit (panel B) in the reconstitution buffer. These mixtures were used for gel shift assays, and the radioactivity in DNA-gyrase complex was counted.
[View Larger Version of this Image (18K GIF file)]


DISCUSSION

Gyrase is a target protein of several antibiotics, some of whose mechanisms have been analyzed in detail. Coumarin drugs bind the NH2-terminal domain of the B subunit and inhibit ATP hydrolysis of the enzyme. Quinolone antibiotics are deduced to bind a transient complex consisting of cleaved DNA and gyrase, which are bound covalently to each other. Analysis of the resistant mutations of the gyrase gene revealed that mutations occurred in the corresponding domains where these antibiotics act. Isolated mutant gyrases showed resistant features in vitro as well as in vivo (33-35).

The present work showed that acriflavine suppressed DNA binding of gyrase (Fig. 7), and the acrB mutation caused the reduction of DNA binding (Figs. 7 and 8). These results suggest that the acrB mutation is also related to the antibiotic mechanism as the resistant mutations against coumarin and quinolone. Acriflavine is well known as a DNA intercalate substance, and it changes the superhelical density of plasmid as ethidium bromide does, implying that it changes the conformation of the DNA strand. We found that similar concentrations of acriflavine were effective in inhibiting the wild-type gyrase and an 80-fold higher amount of the mutant gyrase in the supercoiling assay (Fig. 3). Therefore, acriflavine is most likely to interact with DNA and not directly with the gyrase protein. As the DNA binding is the initial step of gyrase function, it is reasonable to consider that acriflavine suppresses the subsequent processes such as ATPase activation (Fig. 6) and DNA supercoiling (Fig. 3).

The acrB mutation, however, did not change the sensitivity of gyrase to acriflavine in vitro, unlike the resistant mutations against coumarin and quinolone, which change the sensitivity of the gyrase to them, respectively. Supercoiling assay and gel shift assay (Figs. 3 and 7) indicated that the mutant enzyme reduced the activity without becoming more sensitive to acriflavine. These findings suggest that the acriflavine-sensitive feature of acrB is mainly the result of a reduction of specific activity. When we prepared the cell extract from strain N2879 with partial purification by polymine P precipitation (27), no supercoiling activity was detected in that extract, whereas the expected activity was found in the extract from the wild-type strain (data not shown). Thus, gyrase activity in vivo also seemed to be decreased. The mechanism of the susceptibility to acriflavine in vivo, however, appears too complex to be elucidated. For example, the reduction of supercoiling activity may cause a decrease in the superhelical density of genome DNA which allows acriflavine to have greater access to DNA.

The acrB mutation alters two amino acids (S759R/R760C) near the COOH-terminal end of the gyrase B subunit (Fig. 1). The region designated as C-TERM in Fig. 1 is separated from the NH2-terminal part of the B subunit by an insertion of about a 170-amino acid sequence (black boxed in Fig. 1), which is absent in gyrases of Gram-positive bacteria, bacterial topoisomerase IV (parE gene), and eukaryotic topoisomerase II. The C-TERM is expected to be a separable structural domain, but the relationship to DNA binding has not been reported in the region. Fig. 9A shows the homology of the C-TERM region to the corresponding regions of B subunit of Bacillus subtilis gyrase and parE protein of E. coli topoisomerase IV. As the deletion of 29 amino acids from the COOH-terminal end of parE protein (double underlined in Fig. 9A) results in a loss of ability to associate with parC protein (counterpart of the gyrase A subunit) (36), C-TERM potentially includes a structure necessary for association with the A subunit. Thus we examined whether the acrB mutation affects the association with the A subunit. The mutant B subunit, however, showed normal assembly with the A subunit in the gel filtration assay (Fig. 4) and the gel shift assay (Fig. 8). These results suggest that the reduction of DNA binding is caused by an alteration in the C-TERM region itself, not by loss of the quaternary structure.


Fig. 9. Homology and hydrophobicity plot of mutation region. Panel A, comparison of the amino acid sequences of C-TERM region of E. coli gyrase B subunit (gyrB) and corresponding region of B. subtilis gyrase (subB) and E. coli parE product (parE). Superscript and subscript letters in E. coli gyrase indicate the wild-type and acrB mutant sequence, respectively. Identical amino acids are indicated by two dots, and conservative differences are indicated by a single dot. Conserved amino acids in type II topoisomerase enzymes are indicated by open boxes. Arrows indicate the amino acid residues expected to contact to the other B subunit (37). The double underlined sequence in parE is putative association region with parC protein (A subunit homolog) (36; see "Discussion"). The numbers of amino acid residues correspond to the position of E. coli gyrase. Panel B, hydrophobicity plot of the C-TERM region of E. coli gyrase. Hydropathy values were computed according to Kyte and Doolittle (43). The horizontal scale is adjusted to the amino acid sequence in panel A. The region of acrB mutation is indicated by a bar.
[View Larger Version of this Image (24K GIF file)]

Berger et al. (37) have recently reported the crystal structure of yeast topoisomerase II and pointed out that a region including a highly conserved sequence (Fig. 9A), which is located at about 20 residues NH2-terminal from the acrB site, is involved in the contact with the other B subunit in the gyrase tetramer. Considered together with the A subunit-associating region described above, the C-TERM region appeared to serve the two functional structures that are related to contact with the partner A and B subunits, respectively. The crystal structure of topoisomerase II indicates that the counterpart of the region between the conserved sequence and acrB is composed of an alpha -helix and forms an axis that extends to the linker between the A' and B' subfragments. Therefore, the axis-like structure in the NH2-terminal part of C-TERM may structurally support the B' subfragment as a backbone. Further, during the enzyme reaction of topoisomerase II, a hinge motion of a polypeptide segment located between the A' and B' subfragments is suggested by an SV8 proteolysis experiment (38). The COOH-terminal part of C-TERM is expected to serve as the hinge region because it corresponds to the disordered linker region between the A' and B' subfragments in the crystal structure (37). These features of C-TERM led us to the hypothesis that one of the roles of this region is to provide a structure necessary for the conformational change of gyrase. During the enzyme reaction, the B subunits have to come apart for DNA entering. The contact to the other B subunit must be lost in this step, and the hinge motion of the COOH-terminal part of C-TERM is thought to separate each B subunit (37, 39), which is probably supported structurally by the NH2-terminal part of C-TERM. Therefore, a mutation in C-TERM is expected to cause a disordered arrangement of the whole B subunit and/or disadvantage in conformational change of gyrase.

Several possibilities are expected to reduce the DNA binding affinity. One possibility is that the acrB mutation affects DNA recognition and/or the subsequent conformational change of gyrase which is induced during DNA binding. From the analogy of crystal structure of topoisomerase II, acrB seems to be located near the active site tyrosine and CAP-like DNA binding domain in the A subunit. The hydrophobicity plot shows that the mutation region is hydrophilic (Fig. 9B), implying that the amino acid residues are located at the surface of the protein. Further, the acrB mutation changes the location of a positive charge (Arg760) which might interact directly with DNA. Therefore, it is possible to speculate that this region is related directly to the recognition and/or transportation of DNA to the DNA binding domain of the A subunit. In fact, DNA binding is suggested to cause a structural change of the region corresponding to the COOH-terminal part of C-TERM (38). The amino acid sequence near the acrB mutation region is well conserved in the E. coli parE gene product as well as in B. subtilis gyrase (Fig. 9A). DNA binding characteristics of topoisomerase IV are thought to be more similar to those of type II eukaryotic enzymes than those of the gyrases from the observation that topoisomerase IV protects only short region (34 base pairs) of DNA from micrococcal nuclease digestion as eukaryotic topoisomerase II (40). Thus, the acrB mutation region seems to be related to general DNA binding and not to the gyrase-specific DNA wrapping, which is thought to be caused by the 33-kDa domain of the A subunit (17).


FOOTNOTES

*   The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

 The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/DDBJ Data Bank with accession number(s) D87842[GenBank].


§   To whom correspondence should be addressed: Aburahi Laboratories, Shionogi and Co., Ltd., 1405 Gotanda, Koka, Shiga 520-34, Japan. Tel.: 81-748-88-6510; Fax: 81-748-88-6508.
1   The abbreviations used are: DTT, dithiothreitol; BSA, bovine serum albumin.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Dr. G. Katsuura and Dr. M. Ishizuka for helpful advice on the ATPase assay and the gel mobility shift assay, respectively.


REFERENCES

  1. Drake, J. W. (1964) J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 64, 1-19
  2. Nakamura, H. (1965) J. Bacteriol. 90, 8-14
  3. Nakamura, H., Hachiya, N., and Tojo, T. (1978) J. Bacteriol. 134, 1184-1187 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Nakamura, H. (1979) J. Bacteriol. 139, 8-12 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Nakamura, H., and Okada, N. (1989) Mem. Konan Univ. Sci. Ser. 36, 83-88
  6. Nakamura, H. (1968) J. Bacteriol. 96, 987-996 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Nakamura, H. (1967) J. Bacteriol. 93, 1183-1184 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Hase, A., Funatsuki, K., Kawakami, M., and Nakamura, H. (1990) Plant Cell Physiol. 31, 1053-1057
  9. Ma, D., Cook, D. N., Alberti, M., Pon, N. G., Nikaido, H., and Hearst, J. E. (1993) J. Bacteriol. 175, 6299-6313 [Abstract]
  10. Klein, J. R., Henrich, B., and Plapp, R. (1991) Mol. & Gen. Genet. 230, 230-240 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. DiNardo, S., Voelkel, K. A., and Sternglanz, R. (1982) Cell 31, 43-51 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Hansen, I. G., and Meyenburg, K. v. (1979) Mol. & Gen. Genet. 175, 135-144 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Backmann, B. J. (1983) Microbiol. Rev. 47, 180-230
  14. Cozzarelli, N. R. (1980) Science 207, 953-960 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Gellert, M. (1981) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 50, 879-910 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Maxwell, A., and Gellert, M. (1986) Adv. Protein Chem. 38, 69-107 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Reece, R. J., and Maxwell, A. (1991) CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 26, 335-375
  18. Kirchhausen, T., Wang, J. C., and Harrison, S. C. (1985) Cell 41, 933-943 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Wigley, D. B., Davies, G. J., Dodson, E. J., Maxwell, A., and Dodson, G. (1991) Nature 351, 624-629 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Brown, P. O., Peebles, C. L., and Cozzarelli, N. R. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 76, 6110-6114 [Abstract]
  21. Gellert, M., Fisher, L. M., and O'Dea, M. H. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 76, 6289-6293 [Abstract]
  22. Yamagishi, J., Yoshida, H., Yamayoshi, M., and Nakamura, S. (1986) Mol. & Gen. Genet. 204, 367-373 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  24. Cosloy, S. D., and Oishi, M. (1973) Mol. & Gen. Genet. 124, 1-10 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Mizuuchi, K., Mizuuchi, M., O'Dea, M. H., and Gellert, M. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 9199-9201 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Staudenbauer, W. L., and Orr, E. (1981) Nucleic Acids Res. 9, 3589-3603 [Abstract]
  27. Otter, R., and Cozzarelli, N. R. (1983) Methods Enzymol. 100, 171-180 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Taylor, M. W., Hershey, H. V., Levine, R. A., Coy, K., and Olivelle, S. (1981) J. Chromatogr. 219, 133-139 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Fisher, L. M., Mizuuchi, K., O'Dea, M. H., Ohmori, H., and Gellert, M. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 78, 4165-4169 [Abstract]
  30. Bachellier, S., Saurin, W., Perrin, D., Hofnung, M., and Gilson, E. (1994) Mol. Microbiol. 12, 61-70 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Adachi, T., Mizuuchi, M., Robinson, E. A., Appella, E., O'Dea, M. H., Gellert, M., and Mizuuchi, K. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 771-784 [Abstract]
  32. Menzel, R., and Gellert, M. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 4185-4189 [Abstract]
  33. Gellert, M., O'Dea, M. H., Itoh, T., and Tomizawa, J. (1976) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 73, 4474-4478 [Abstract]
  34. Contreras, A., and Maxwell, A. (1992) Mol. Microbiol. 6, 1617-1624 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Yoshida, H., Kojima, T., Yamagishi, J., and Nakamura, S. (1988) Mol. & Gen. Genet. 211, 1-7 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Peng, H., and Marians, K. J. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 24481-24490 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Berger, J. M., Gamblin, S. J., Harrison, S. C., and Wang, J. C. (1996) Nature 379, 225-232 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Lindsley, J. E., and Wang, J. C. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 10485-10489 [Abstract]
  39. Berger, J. M., and Wang, J. C. (1996) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6, 84-90 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Peng, H., and Marians, K. J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 25286-25290 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Watt, P. M., and Hickson, D. (1994) Biochem. J. 303, 681-695 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Wyckoff, E., Natalie, D., Nolan, J. M., Lee, M., and Hsieh, T. (1989) J. Mol. Biol. 205, 1-13 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Kyte, J., and Doolittle, R. F. (1982) J. Mol. Biol. 157, 105-132 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.