(Received for publication, November 15, 1996)
From the Department of Physiology, University of
Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0622 and the
¶ Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of
South Florida College of Medicine, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research
Institute, Tampa, Florida 33612
We have previously found that the
ignal
ransducer and
ctivator of
ranscription (Stat) 3 is constitutively activated in cells
stably transformed by the v-Src oncoprotein. While activation of Stat
proteins has also been observed following epidermal growth factor or
platelet-derived growth factor stimulation, Stat3 activation is more
commonly associated with signaling through cytokine receptors and
activation of the Janus family tyrosine kinases JAK1 or JAK2. We
therefore investigated whether JAK1 or JAK2 were activated in
Src-transformed cells. In three v-Src-transformed fibroblast cell lines
(NIH3T3, Balb/c, and 3Y1), JAK1 displayed increased tyrosyl
phosphorylation compared to non-transformed cells. The level of tyrosyl
phosphorylation of JAK1 was significantly greater in NIH3T3 cells
transformed by expression of v-Src or high levels of a constitutively
active mutant of c-Src (Y527F) than in cells overexpressing the less
transforming normal c-Src. Enzymatic activity of JAK1 was assessed
using autophosphorylation assays. In anti-JAK1 immunoprecipitates from
v-Src-transformed NIH3T3 cells, a protein with the same migration as
JAK1 showed substantially increased levels of 32P
incorporation compared to immunoprecipitates from non-transformed cells. Similar results were obtained using anti-JAK2
immunoprecipitates; however, the level of JAK2 tyrosyl phosphorylation
and 32P incorporation in anti-JAK2 immunoprecipitates were
markedly lower than in anti-JAK1 immunoprecipitates. We conclude that
JAK1, and possibly JAK2, are constitutively activated in
Src-transformed cells, raising the possibility that Janus family
kinases contribute to the constitutive activation of Stat3 previously
observed in these cells and/or other properties of Src-transformed
cells.
The product of the v-src oncogene, v-Src, is a constitutively activated protein-tyrosine kinase that is thought to induce cell transformation through unregulated tyrosyl phosphorylation and activation of normal cellular pathways involved in the control of cellular growth (1, 2). Although transformation by oncogenic forms of Src is one of the most thoroughly characterized models of cell transformation, the biochemical pathways that link this activated kinase to changes in cellular physiology and proliferation have not been fully elucidated. Clearly, changes in gene expression are a requisite part of the transformation process initiated by v-src or any other oncogene (3). Little is understood, however, about the mechanisms by which the v-Src tyrosine kinase at the cell membrane regulates the expression of genes in the nucleus.
The ignal
ransducers and
ctivators of
ranscription
(Stats)1 are a family of latent cytoplasmic
transcription factors that are activated by phosphorylation. Stat
proteins become tyrosyl-phosphorylated following activation of a number
of receptor-tyrosine kinase signaling complexes. Tyrosyl-phosphorylated
Stats form homo- and heterodimeric complexes that, at least in some
cases, may also include additional non-Stat accessory proteins. These
complexes migrate to the nucleus where they bind specific DNA elements
within the promoters of appropriate target genes (4, 5). While tyrosyl
phosphorylation is necessary for Stat complex formation and DNA
binding, additional phosphorylation of specific serine and/or threonine
residues has been shown to be required for several Statcontaining
complexes to function as transcriptional activators (6, 7).
Although Stat activation has been described following activation of the receptor tyrosine kinases for epidermal growth factor (EGF) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) (8-10), Stat activation is more commonly associated with signaling through the Janus (or JAK) tyrosine kinase family (5). This signaling system, often referred to as the JAK-Stat pathway, appears to be a major route for transcriptional regulation controlled by a diverse array of growth factors, differentiation factors, and hormones that signal through receptors of the cytokine/hematopoietin family. Ligand engagement of receptors promotes activation of receptor-associated JAKs, with the subsequent formation of one or more Stat complexes and transcriptional activation of factor-dependent target genes. Both Stat and JAK activation are transient, even in the continuous presence of the activating ligand, suggesting that JAK-Stat pathways are normally tightly regulated.
In rat and murine fibroblasts transformed by various oncogenic forms of Src, we observed that Stat3 is constitutively tyrosyl-phosphorylated and present in a complex competent to bind DNA (11), suggesting that genes normally transcriptionally activated by Stat3 may be constitutively activated in Src-transformed cells. The mechanism by which Src transformation promotes activation of Stat3 is not known. Although data from experiments involving co-expression of Stat3 and v-Src in yeast indicate that v-Src is capable of directly phosphorylating Stat3,2 we investigated whether Src might also be acting through the typical upstream activators of Stat3, the Janus kinases JAK1 and/or JAK2. In this report we show that JAK1, and possibly JAK2, are constitutively activated in Src-transformed cells.
3Y1, NIH3T3, Balb/c, and their
Src-transformed counterparts have been described earlier (11-13).
Anti-JAK2 serum (JAK2), raised against a synthetic peptide
corresponding to amino acids 758-776, was prepared in our laboratory
in conjunction with Pel Freez Laboratories as described previously (9).
Anti-JAK1 serum (
JAK1), raised against a synthetic peptide
corresponding to amino acids 785-804 of murine JAK1, was kindly
provided by J. Ihle, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis,
TN. Anti-Src monoclonal N2-17 was obtained from the NCI repository
(Quality Biotech.). Mouse monoclonal anti-phosphotyrosine antibody 4G10
(
PY) was purchased from Upstate Biotechnology Inc. Triton X-100 came
from Pierce, recombinant protein A-agarose from Repligen, and enhanced
chemiluminescence (ECL) detection system from Amersham Corp. All other
reagents were of reagent grade or better.
Exponentially
growing cultures were rinsed three times with PBSV (10 mM
sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, 137 mM NaCl, 1 mM
sodium orthovanadate) and scraped in lysis buffer (50 mM
Tris, pH 7.5, 0.1% Triton X-100, 137 mM NaCl, 2 mM EGTA, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and
10 µg/ml leupeptin) on ice. Cell lysates were centrifuged at
12,000 × g for 10 min and the resulting supernatants
were incubated on ice for 2 h with the indicated antibody. Immune
complexes were collected on protein A-agarose during a 60-min
incubation at 8 °C, washed three times with 50 mM Tris,
pH 7.5, 0.1% Triton X-100, 137 mM NaCl, 2 mM
EGTA and boiled for 5 min in a mixture (80:20) of lysis buffer and
5 × SDS-PAGE sample buffer (250 mM Tris (pH 6.8),
10% SDS, 10% -mercaptoethanol, and 40% glycerol). The supernatant was subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by Western blot analysis with the
indicated antibody using the ECL detection system (14).
Exponentially growing cultures were rinsed
three times with PBSV and scraped on ice in 25 mM HEPES, pH
7.4, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and 10 µg/ml
leupeptin). Cell lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min, and the resulting supernatants were incubated
on ice for 2 h with the indicated antibody. Immune complexes were
collected on protein A-agarose during a 60-min incubation at 8 °C,
washed twice with wash buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 0.1%
Triton X-100, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 150 mM
NaCl) and once with phosphorylation buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH
7.6, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 6.25 mM manganese chloride, 100 mM NaCl). For
autophosphorylation assays, 100 µl of phosphorylation buffer
containing ~100 µCi of -[32P]ATP and 100 µg/ml
each of aprotinin and leupeptin was added directly to the immune
complexes on ice. Reactions were incubated at 30 °C for 10 min (a
time at which 32P incorporation was still in the linear
range) then stopped by addition of stop buffer (wash buffer containing
10 mM EDTA). The immune complexes were washed once with
stop buffer, twice with wash buffer, and boiled for 5 min in SDS-PAGE
sample buffer. Solubilized proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE on
3-10% polyacrylamide gradient gels. Phosphorylated proteins were
visualized by autoradiography.
Since the Janus kinases are tyrosyl-phosphorylated when
activated, we first examined whether JAK1 or JAK2 displays increased tyrosyl phosphorylation in v-Src-transformed cells. JAK1 and JAK2 were
immunoprecipitated from rat 3Y1, murine NIH3T3, or murine Balb/c cells
and their v-Src-transformed counterparts SR1, NIH-VS, and Balb/c-VS,
respectively. The immunoprecipitated proteins were analyzed by Western
blotting using an antibody to phosphotyrosine (PY) (Fig.
1). Both JAK1 and JAK2 showed increased levels of tyrosyl phosphorylation in all three v-Src-transformed lines when compared to their non-transformed counterparts. However, the apparent level of tyrosyl phosphorylation in the
JAK1 immunoprecipitates was
substantially greater than that observed in
JAK2 immunoprecipitates. Additionally, while an elevated level of JAK1 tyrosyl phosphorylation was detectable in all experiments, tyrosyl phosphorylation of JAK2 was
more variable, being undetectable in some experiments.
The increased levels of tyrosyl-phosphorylated JAK1 and JAK2 reflect increased tyrosyl phosphorylation of the proteins rather than increased levels of expression. Expression of v-Src did not increase expression levels of JAK1 or JAK2 in any of the three cell lines as judged by Western blotting (data not shown). In fact, NIH3T3 cells expressing v-Src or other Src variants (see below) had slightly decreased (by 30-40%) JAK1 expression compared to untransformed NIH3T3 cells.
Interestingly, JAK1 immunoprecipitates from v-Src-transformed cells
contained a number of other tyrosyl-phosphorylated proteins in addition
to JAK1 (Fig. 1, lanes B, D, and F).
Additional tyrosyl-phosphorylated proteins were also apparent in the
JAK2 immunoprecipitates (Fig. 1, lanes H, J,
and L) but, like the tyrosyl phosphorylation of JAK2 itself,
their number, intensity, and reproducibility were less than observed in
JAK1 immunoprecipitates. One of these associated proteins appears to
be Src (see below). While we do not know the identity of any of the
other proteins at the present time, they may represent potential JAK
substrates.
We examined the level of tyrosyl
phosphorylation of JAK1 and JAK2 in cells overexpressing forms of Src
with different transforming potency (Fig. 2). JAK1 (Fig.
2, lanes A-D) and JAK2 (Fig. 2, lanes E-H) were
immunoprecipitated from control NIH3T3 cells (Fig. 2, lanes
A and E) and from NIH3T3 cells transformed by high
levels of expression of normal c-Src (Fig. 2, lanes B and
F), the Y527F constitutively active mutant of c-Src (Fig. 2,
lanes C and G) or v-Src (Fig. 2, lanes
D and H), and analyzed by immunoblotting with PY.
The level of tyrosyl-phosphorylated JAK1 and JAK2 was significantly
higher in immunoprecipitates from cells transformed by the more highly
transforming c-Src Y527F and v-Src than in cells partially transformed
by overexpression of the more weakly transforming normal c-Src.
Src Co-precipitates with JAK1
The JAK immunoprecipitates
from Src expressing NIH3T3 cells contain tyrosyl-phosphorylated
proteins migrating at a position appropriate for Src (Fig. 2). To test
if Src was indeed present, we used an anti-Src antibody to probe
JAK1 immunoprecipitates from control, c-Src overexpressing, and
v-Src expressing NIH3T3 cells (Fig. 3, lanes
A-C).
Src recognized a band of the appropriate size (~60
kDa) for Src in immunoprecipitates from cells either expressing v-Src
or overexpressing c-Src. No Src was detected in immunoprecipitates from
control NIH3T3 cells or where non-immune serum was used in place of
JAK1 (data not shown). Significantly more Src was detected in the
immunoprecipitates from cells overexpressing c-Src than in those from
v-Src-transformed cells. Western blotting of
Src immunoprecipitates
with
Src (Fig. 3, lanes D-F) indicated that this
difference most likely reflects the different levels of Src protein
expressed in these two cell lines.
JAK1 and JAK2 Immunoprecipitates from v-Src-transformed Cells Have Increased Kinase Activity
We sought to determine if JAKs 1 and 2 isolated from Src-transformed cells possess increased enzymatic
activity in addition to their increased level of tyrosyl
phosphorylation. JAK1 and
JAK2 immunoprecipitates from normal and
Src-transformed cells were subjected to immune-complex kinase assays to
measure autophosphorylation. In
JAK1 immunoprecipitates assayed for
kinase activity, a protein with the same migration as JAK1 displays
increased incorporation of 32P in immunoprecipitates from
v-Src-transformed NIH3T3 cells compared to untransformed cells (Fig.
4, lane B). The amount of JAK1 present in
each immunoprecipitate was the same as judged by Western blotting with
JAK1 (data not shown). In addition to JAK1, several other proteins
had increased 32P incorporation in immunoprecipitates from
v-Src-transformed cells and may represent JAK1-associated proteins.
Preincubation of
JAK1 with its antigenic peptide (Fig. 4, lane
C), but not with an analogous peptide derived from JAK2 (Fig. 4,
lane D), prevented the appearance of all bands showing
increased phosphorylation in immunoprecipitates from v-Src-transformed
cells. These bands were also absent when non-immune rabbit serum was
used in place of
JAK1 (Fig. 4, lane E). When
JAK2 was
used instead of
JAK1 (data not shown), the results obtained were
essentially the same with one important exception. The amount of kinase
activity present in the
JAK2 immunoprecipitates was approximately
100-fold lower than that in the
JAK1 immunoprecipitates as judged by
the length of exposure required to obtain a detectable signal
(approximately 15 min for JAK1 versus 24 h for
JAK2).
Consistent with the kinase activity in JAK1 immunoprecipitates
originating with JAK1 and not v-Src, we did not observe a phosphorylated protein with a migration appropriate for v-Src even
though the experiments depicted in Fig. 3 suggest that a small amount
of v-Src co-precipitates with JAK1. The absence of a band in Fig. 4
corresponding in size to Src is most likely explained by the very low
levels of Src, especially v-Src, in
JAK1 immunoprecipitates. Alternately, it might be that the Src protein in association with JAK1
is not capable of further phosphorylation, either because it lacks
available phosphorylation sites or is not catalytically active. While
we favor the interpretation that the phosphorylation of JAK1 in these
in vitro kinase assay results from the activity of JAK1
itself, we cannot rule out the possibility that part of this
phosphorylation is attributable to v-Src co-precipitated with JAK1.
Our results show that the Janus kinases JAK1 and JAK2 are
constitutively tyrosyl-phosphorylated in Src-transformed cells and suggest that JAK1, and possibly JAK2, is in an activated state in these
cells. These findings raise the possibility that JAK1 and/or JAK2 might
be at least partly responsible for the constitutive activation of Stat3
previously described (11) in Src-transformed cells. In this regard, it
is interesting to note that both JAK1 and JAK2 contain putative binding
sites (YXXQ motif, Ref. 15) for Stat3, while neither v-Src
nor c-Src contains these sites. It is also interesting to speculate
that the apparently greater activation of JAK1 compared to JAK2 might
account for the observed targeting of Stat3 rather than Stat1 for
activation in Src-transformed cells. While JAK2 contains a motif
similar to the putative Stat1 binding site (16) in the interferon-
receptor, JAK1, v-Src and c-Src do not. Although both JAK1 and JAK2
have been shown to phosphorylate Stat1 when co-expressed in Sf9 cells
and in in vitro kinase assays (17), JAK1 was significantly
less efficient than JAK2 in phosphorylating Stat1 in vitro
(see Fig. 5 in Ref. 17). Thus, under conditions of normal levels of
expression of the JAK and Stat proteins, JAK1 activation alone may not
be sufficient for Stat1 activation. On the other hand, when both Src
and Stat3 are expressed in yeast, Src can phosphorylate Stat3 without
the assistance of JAK1.2 However, these results in yeast do
not preclude the possibility that JAK1 could be required for Stat3
activation by Src in mammalian cells. Further work will be required to
resolve the role of JAK1 in the constitutive activation of Stat3
observed in Src-transformed cells.
These findings also raise the question of whether activation of JAK1 and Stat3 might be important in the normal function of c-Src. It has been established that one of the functions of c-Src is to participate in intracellular signaling initiated by the binding of a number of growth factors, such as PDGF, colony-stimulating factor 1, and EGF, to their cell surface receptors. Src binds directly to these activated receptors and becomes itself activated (18-21). Microinjection of either neutralizing anti-Src family kinase antibodies or a dominant-negative mutant of c-Src into cells prior to stimulation blocks PDGF, colony-stimulating factor 1, or EGF-induced entry into S-phase (22, 23), suggesting that activation of Src family kinases is necessary for these factors to induce mitogenesis. Each of these factors has been shown to promote the tyrosyl phosphorylation and DNA binding activity of proteins recognized by an antibody directed against the C-terminal portion of Stat3 (10). Activation of JAK1 has also been reported in EGF-stimulated cells. It is possible that c-Src has a role in activation of Stat3 and JAK1 by these growth factor receptors.
What role the constitutive activation of the JAKs might play in Src-dependent cell transformation is not clear. Unlike the growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases, such as the receptors for EGF and PDGF, that have been directly linked to mitogenesis, signaling through the JAK-Stat pathway(s) has been primarily associated with the maintenance, differentiation, and activation of cells of the hematopoietic and lymphocytic lineages. Yet, cellular differentiation often involves proliferation, and several lines of evidence suggest that increased activity of JAK2 may be responsible for increased proliferation of EPO-dependent hematopoietic progenitor cells. In most systems examined thus far, JAK and Stat activation is highly transient, even in the continued presence of the activating cytokine. The tight regulation of JAK-Stat signaling is thought to be accomplished through the activity of cellular phosphatases. In CHO cells expressing a mutant form of the EPO receptor that lacks the ability to bind SHP-1, EPO-induced JAK2 activation is greatly prolonged compared to that observed in 32D cells expressing the wild type EPO receptor (24). In mice bearing the mutations "Motheaten" or "Motheaten viable," the hematopoietic progenitor cells lack functional SHP-1 (25). These mice have multiple abnormalities in their hematopoietic system including an elevated population of erythroid progenitor cells. In culture, these progenitors show a greatly heightened sensitivity to EPO-induced proliferation. Patients with a mutant EPO receptor lacking the SHP-1 binding domain were also found to have elevated levels of various erythroid cells and erythroid progenitor cells with hypersensitivity to EPO (26). Taken together, these observations suggest that increased or unregulated activity of JAKs may, at least in certain contexts, contribute to aberrant cellular proliferation.
Activation of JAKs and/or Stats has been reported in other oncogenic model systems. JAK2 is constitutively activated in acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Furthermore, the JAK2 inhibitor tyrphostin AG-490 induced apoptosis in these cells, strongly suggesting that the constitutive JAK2 activity is necessary for the aberrant growth of these cells (27). Human T cell lymphotropic virus I (HTLV-I) infection of peripheral blood T cells results in a progression to interleukin (IL)-2 independent growth. Migone et al. (28) reported constitutive activation of JAKs 1 and 3 and Stats 3 and 5 that was temporally linked to the emergence of IL-2-independent growth in these cells. As these are the same JAK and Stat proteins that are activated in response to IL-2 in these cells, it is reasonable to speculate that their constitutive activation may be important for transformation by HTLV-1. Similarly, murine pre-B cells transformed by v-Abl showed constitutive formation of Stat-containing DNA binding factors and activation of JAKs 1 and 3 (29). Recent studies of a Drosophila Stat homologue, D-Stat, are also suggestive of a role for JAK-Stat pathways in cell proliferation and oncogenesis (30, 31). Interestingly, gain-of-function mutations affecting a Drosophila JAK homologue, HOP, are associated with melanotic tumors and hypertrophy of hematopoietic tissues (32, 33). Mutations in D-Stat suppress the tumorigenic phenotype of these activated HOP mutants, suggesting that JAK-Stat signaling is essential for tumor formation (30, 31). While it remains to be determined whether JAKs and Stats have causal roles in Src oncogenesis, our results are consistent with the possibility that JAK-Stat signaling pathways contribute to some facet of oncogenesis induced by Src.
We are grateful to Dr. J. Ihle and B. Witthuhn for the gift of antibodies to JAK1 and JAK1 synthetic peptide. We would also like to acknowledge the helpful comments of Dr. Debra Meyer, Mary Stofega, and Dr. Lawrence Argetsinger.