Functional Subdomains of Yeast Elongation Factor 3
LOCALIZATION OF RIBOSOME-BINDING DOMAIN*

(Received for publication, September 6, 1996)

Ravi Kambampati and Kalpana Chakraburtty Dagger

From the Medical College of Wisconsin, Department of Biochemistry, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Elongation factor 3 (EF-3) is an essential requirement of the fungi for translational elongation. EF-3 is an ATPase, and the hydrolytic activity is stimulated 2 orders of magnitude by yeast ribosomes. Limited trypsinolysis of EF-3 results in the cleavage of a single peptide bond between residues 774 (Arg) and 775 (Gln), generating polypeptides of approximate molecular mass 90 and 30 kDa. The 90-kDa fragment is relatively resistant to proteolysis and retains ribosome-independent ATPase activity. The 30-kDa fragment is further proteolyzed into smaller fragments and retains the specificity for binding to yeast ribosomes. Both the intact EF-3 and the 30-kDa fragment are protected from proteolysis by yeast ribosomes. EF-3 is NH2 terminally blocked, and so is the 90-kDa fragment. The COOH terminally derived 30-kDa fragment contains glutamine (residue 775) at the NH2-terminal end. A construct was designed representing the COOH-terminal domain of EF-3 (30-kDa fragment), subcloned, and expressed as a glutathione S-transferase fusion in yeast. The glutathione S-transferase-30-kDa peptide remains stringently associated with ribosomes. Isolated fusion peptide rebinds to yeast ribosomes with high affinity. Based on these results, we propose that at least one of the ribosome-binding sites of EF-3 resides at the COOH-terminal end of the protein.


INTRODUCTION

Eukaryotic elongation factor 1 (EF-1alpha )1 and factor 2 (EF-2) are functional homologs of bacterial elongation factors EF-Tu and EF-G (1) and are essential requirements for translational elongation in all organisms (2). Fungal ribosomes uniquely require an additional protein, elongation factor 3 (EF-3), for peptide chain elongation reaction (3-5). Biochemical and immunological analysis of non-fungal eukaryotes show the absence of EF-3 (5, 6). EF-3 stimulates EF-1alpha -dependent binding of aminoacyl-tRNA to the ribosomal A-site when the E-site is occupied by deacylated tRNA (7). EF-3 induces conformational change of ribosomes from the post- to the pretranslocational state, facilitating release of deacylated tRNA from the E-site with concomitant binding of aminoacyl-tRNA to the ribosomal A-site (7-9).

EF-3 is an NTPase. The hydrolytic activity of EF-3 is enhanced 2 orders of magnitude by yeast ribosomes due to the increase in the turnover rate of EF-3-ATPase (10-12). The ATP hydrolytic activity of EF-3 is essential for its function in translation (7-12). The amino acid sequence of EF-3, derived from the DNA sequence data, reveals the presence of duplicated nucleotide-binding motifs referred to as ABC cassettes or Walker boxes (13-15). EF-3 binds 2 mol of ATP per mol of protein (16). The two ATP-binding sites of EF-3 display a positive co-operativity (11). By directed mutagenesis, we have identified a critical lysine residue in the second ABC cassette that is indispensable for the biological function of EF-3.2

The structural gene for EF-3 has been cloned and sequenced from four fungal species (14-20). Gene disruption analysis (14) combined with the existence of conditionally defective EF-3 mutants (21, 22) confirm indispensability of the YEF3 gene in yeast.

Several structural features of the EF-3 protein are noteworthy. Besides the duplicated nucleotide-binding motifs, EF-3 contains three blocks of lysine residues at the COOH-terminal end (23). Of the last 57 residues of EF-3, 50% are charged. Of these, 40% are basic (24). The conserved lysine and the arginine residues are implicated in ribosomal protein/rRNA interaction (25). EF-3 binds to the guanine-rich sequences of 18 S and 26 S rRNA (26). In this communication, we report the results of our studies defining the ribosome-binding domain of EF-3 using biochemical and molecular biological tools.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

All biochemical materials were obtained from standard sources as described in previous communications (11). Radiolabeled ATP was obtained from Amersham Corp. TPCK-treated trypsin was obtained from Worthington; soybean trypsin inhibitor was from Sigma.

Buffers

The following buffers were used. Buffer A: 0.1 M Tris/HCl, pH 8.0; Buffer B: 25 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM Mg(OAc)2, 50 mM NH4Cl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 3% (v/v) glycerol; Buffer C: 60 mM Tris acetate, pH 8.0, 5.0 mM Mg(OAc)2, 20 mM NH4Cl, 10 mM dithiothreitol; Buffer D: same as buffer B plus 0.1 mM EDTA and 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; Buffer E: 60 mM Tris acetate, pH 7.0, 50 mM NH4Cl, 5 mM Mg(OAc)2, 2 mM spermidine, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 0.008 trypsin inhibitory units/ml; Buffer F: 20 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.6, 3.5 mM MgCl2, 100 mM NH4Cl, 6 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.05 mM spermidine; Buffer G: 20 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, 3 mM MgCl2, 600 mM KCl, 6 mM 2-mercaptoethanol; Buffer H: 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM dithiothreitol; Buffer J: 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, 30 mM NH4Cl, 7 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 25% (v/v) glycerol.

Preparation of Ribosomes and Ribosomal Subunits

Cell-free extracts (S-30), postribosomal supernatants (S-100), ribosomes, and ribosomal subunits from Saccharomyces cerevisiae were prepared essentially as described (11). Escherichia coli ribosomes were prepared according to the procedures of Minks et al. (27). The concentrations of ribosomes and subunits were determined taking 1 A260 unit to be equivalent to 18.5 pmol of 80 S ribosomes, 24 pmol of 70 S ribosomes, 56 pmol of 40 S subunits, and 27 pmol of 60 S subunits. SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was performed on 10% gels as described (28). For immunoblotting, proteins were electrophoretically transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane at 4 °C for 4 h at 100 V using a Bio-Rad mini transblot unit. Proteins transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes were developed with polyclonal antibody to EF-3. 125I-Protein A was used as a secondary antibody for the detection of antibody cross-reacting materials (29).

Isolation of EF-3

EF-3 was purified to homogeneity from an overexpressing yeast strain containing plasmid-borne YEF3 gene by a modified protocol of Kamath and Chakraburtty (22). The detailed purification protocol will be published elsewhere.

Proteolytic Cleavage of EF-3

EF-3 (0.6 mg/ml) in Buffer A was digested at 0 °C with TPCK-treated trypsin at a EF-3/trypsin ratio of 125:1 (w/w). In experiments in which EF-3 was treated with trypsin in the presence of ribosomes or ribosomal subunits, EF-3 was preincubated at 30 °C for 10 min in Buffer B with appropriate ribosomal preparations at a ribosome/EF-3 molar ratio of 2:1. The reaction mixtures were digested at 0 °C with TPCK-treated trypsin at a EF-3/trypsin ratio of 10:1. Aliquots were removed at various time intervals as indicated in the figure legends, and reactions were terminated with 5-fold excess of soybean trypsin inhibitor (w/w) over trypsin. Samples were analyzed for ATPase activity in the presence and the absence of ribosomes according to our previously published protocol (11). All samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (28).

Isolation of Fusion Peptide

GST-EF-3 fusion constructs were expressed in yeasts according to the protocols described elsewhere (30).3 Yeast vectors and the appropriate yeast strains for the expression of GST fusion protein were obtained from Dr. Robert Deschenes (University of Iowa, Iowa City). Truncated EF-3 protein was expressed as a GST fusion to facilitate separation from the wild type EF-3. Preparation of cell-free extracts and isolation of ribosomes were carried out as described.3 The GST-30-kDa fusion peptide was found to be stringently associated with the ribosomal fraction. Therefore, for the isolation of the fusion peptide, ribosomes (100 A260 units/ml) were incubated with 90 mM puromycin in Buffer F for 5 min at 30 °C, and solid KCl was added to a final concentration of 0.5 M, layered on top of a 33-ml continuous sucrose gradient (15-33%) in Buffer G. Gradients were centrifuged for 12 h at 131,000 × g in a SW 28 rotor. The fusion peptide was recovered from the top of the gradient, concentrated, and dialyzed four times for 1 h each against 250 ml of Buffer H. The dialyzed protein was applied to a glutathione-Sepharose column (bed volume, 10 ml) preequilibrated with buffer H. After washing the column with 250 ml of Buffer H containing 150 mM NaCl, proteins bound to glutathione-Sepharose beads were eluted with Buffer H containing 20 mM glutathione. The peak fractions were pooled, concentrated, and dialyzed four times for 1 h each against 250 ml of Buffer J.

Binding of GST Fusion Peptide to 80 S Ribosomes

Yeast ribosomes were incubated with increasing concentrations of the purified GST-30-kDa peptide in Buffer B at 30 °C for 10 min. To detect ribosome-bound proteins, reaction mixtures were layered on top of 1-ml cushions of Buffer D containing 10% (v/v) glycerol and centrifuged for 1 h at 50,000 rpm in a Beckman Instruments TLA 100.2 rotor. Pelleted ribosomes were rinsed with the same buffer in order to remove loosely associated proteins. Ribosomal pellets were resuspended in SDS sample buffer and subjected to electrophoresis on SDS-PAGE. Separated proteins were electroblotted onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane for Western blot analysis.

ATPase Activity Assays

The nucleotide hydrolytic activity of EF-3 was measured in standard assay conditions (12). The reactions were carried out in a 50-µl volume of Buffer C for 5 min at 30 °C. For the ribosome-stimulated EF-3 ATPase activity assays, 6.3 pmol of yeast 80 S ribosomes were included in the reaction mixtures in addition to the other components. The amount of 32Pi released from [gamma -32P]ATP was measured according to standard protocol (11).


RESULTS

In an attempt to define the functional domains of EF-3, highly purified protein was subjected to mild proteolysis. EF-3 was treated with TPCK-trypsin at 0 °C and at a trypsin/EF-3 ratio of 1:125. Data presented in Fig. 1 show the time course of EF-3 fragmentation. The Coomassie Blue-stained gel (Fig. 1A) shows that EF-3 was degraded into two major fragments of approximate molecular mass 90 and 30 kDa. The 90-kDa fragment, designated as N peptide, appeared within 5 min of digestion and remained stable to further proteolysis up to 60 min. The 30-kDa fragment, designated as C1 peptide, was further degraded into smaller fragments during the course of digestion. The tryptic products generated were also visualized by immunoblotting with polyclonal antibodies raised against intact EF-3 protein (Fig. 1B). The two low molecular weight fragments having estimated molecular masses of 23 and 15 kDa (designated as C2 and C3 peptides, respectively) were generated from further degradation of the C1 peptide. Close examination of Fig. 1B revealed that the C1 peptide appeared at 5 min, after which the intensity of the fragment continued to diminish and was completely degraded after 20 min of digestion. The disappearance of fragment C1 followed the appearance of fragments C2 and C3. All three peptides disappeared by the end of 60 min of proteolysis.


Fig. 1. Time course of tryptic digestion of EF-3. EF-3 was digested at 0 °C with TPCK-treated trypsin as described under "Experimental Procedures." Aliquots were removed at different time intervals of digestion and were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. A, Coomassie Blue-stained gel; B, immunoblot developed with anti-EF-3 antibodies. Lane 1, standard EF-3; lanes 2-6 represent tryptic digests of EF-3 at 5, 10, 20, 30, and 60 min, respectively; lane MW, molecular mass markers are indicated on the right. The positions of intact EF-3 and those of the tryptic peptides are indicated on the left.
[View Larger Version of this Image (127K GIF file)]


The effect of tryptic cleavage on the activity of EF-3 was followed by ATPase activity assays (Fig. 2). The time course of ATP hydrolysis revealed that about 75% of the intrinsic ATPase activity (ribosome-independent) of EF-3 was retained at the end of digestion (60 min). Ribosome-stimulated ATPase activity of EF-3 was rapidly inactivated within the first 10 min of reaction. The Western blot and the Coomassie Blue-stained gels show complete disappearance of intact EF-3 by 20 min of trypsin digestion (Fig. 1, A and B, lanes 4-6). Therefore, the intrinsic ATPase activity observed at the end of digestion (60 min) is attributed to the N peptide and is not due to the presence of a residual amount of intact EF-3.


Fig. 2. ATPase activity profile of EF-3 during the tryptic time course. EF-3 was digested with trypsin at 0 °C as described under "Experimental Procedures." Aliquots were assayed for ATPase activity in the absence or the presence of yeast 80 S ribosomes. The y axis represents the percentage of ATPase activity remaining at the end of each time period.
[View Larger Version of this Image (20K GIF file)]


In an attempt to identify the subdomain of EF-3 involved in direct interaction with ribosomes, we asked the question whether ribosomes will protect EF-3 from proteolytic cleavage and, if so, whether the protective effect is specific for yeast ribosomes. When EF-3 was treated with trypsin in the presence of ribosomes, the trypsin/EF-3 ratio was 1:10 compared with the ratio of 1:125 in the absence of ribosomes. The proteolytic products of EF-3 were subjected to SDS-PAGE and were analyzed by immunoblotting rather than by Coomassie Blue staining. This is to avoid interference by the ribosomal proteins in visualizing the tryptic fragments of EF-3. The concentration of trypsin used in these analyses has been shown to have minimal effect on the overall ribosomal conformation (32). The results from the experiments on the protective effect of yeast ribosomes on the trypsinolysis of EF-3 are presented in Figs. 3, 4, 5. Data presented in Fig. 3 show the comparative proteolysis of EF-3 with trypsin in the absence and the presence of yeast 80 S ribosomes. The digestion pattern in the absence of ribosomes (Fig. 3A, lanes 1-5) is identical to the one shown in Fig. 1. It is evident that the rate of EF-3 proteolysis was significantly slower in the presence of ribosomes. Much of EF-3 remained intact as judged from the intensities of the EF-3 bands (Fig. 3B, lanes 1-5). The two primary proteolytic products of EF-3 (N and C1 peptides) were protected from further degradation in the presence of ribosomes (Fig. 3B), and the protective effect was best seen for the C1 peptide. In the presence of ribosomes, C1 peptide was protected from further degradation, and hence the peptide accumulated during the time course of digestion (Fig. 3B, lanes 1-5). In the absence of ribosomes, C1 peptide was further degraded into C2 and C3 peptides (Fig. 3A, lanes 1-5). The molecular mass of the N peptide (90 kDa) remained unaltered either in the absence or in the presence of ribosomes (Fig. 3, A and B).


Fig. 3. Protection of tryptic cleavage of EF-3 by yeast ribosomes. EF-3 was digested with trypsin in the absence or the presence of ribosomes as described under "Experimental Procedures." Digests were separated by SDS-PAGE at different time intervals followed by immunoblot analysis. Lanes 1-5 represent digests at 5, 10, 20, 30, and 60 min, respectively. A, EF-3 alone; B, trypsinolysis of EF-3 in the presence of ribosomes; C, analysis of ribosomal pellet from B. The 80S ribosomes from experiment B were pelleted as described under "Experimental Procedures" and analyzed. Control lane represents EF-3 bound to 80 S ribosomes at 0 min prior to tryptic digestion. The positions of intact EF-3 and its fragments are indicated on the left.
[View Larger Version of this Image (99K GIF file)]



Fig. 4. Protection of EF-3 from tryptic degradation by yeast ribosomes and the subunits. A, EF-3 alone; B, EF-3 plus 40 S subunits; C, EF-3 plus 60 S subunits; D, EF-3 plus 80 S ribosomes. Aliquots at various time intervals were subjected to electrophoresis and blotting. Lanes 1-5 represent tryptic digestion for 0, 10, 20, 30, and 60 min, respectively. The position of intact EF-3 and its fragments are indicated on the left.
[View Larger Version of this Image (126K GIF file)]



Fig. 5. Trypsinolysis of EF-3 in the presence of yeast or E. coli ribosomes. EF-3 was treated with trypsin in the presence of yeast 80 S ribosomes (lanes 3-7) or E. coli 70 S ribosomes (lanes 9-13) as described under "Experimental Procedures." Aliquots were taken at various time intervals and subjected to SDS-PAGE. A, Coomassie Blue-stained gel; B, immunoblot of the same gel. Lane 1, standard EF-3; lanes 2 and 8 represent 80 S and 70 S ribosomes, respectively; lanes 3-7 and 9-13 represent tryptic digests at 5, 10, 20, 30, and 60 min, respectively. The positions of EF-3 and C1 peptide are indicated on the left. Lane MW, molecular mass markers.
[View Larger Version of this Image (123K GIF file)]


To demonstrate that the protective effect of yeast ribosomes on the C1 peptide is due to a direct physical association, ribosomes from the above reactions were isolated immediately after the termination of tryptic digestion. Immunoblot analyses of the ribosomal pellets showed that most of the C1 peptide remained associated with the 80 S ribosomes along with the undigested EF-3 (Fig. 3C, lanes 1-5). In contrast, the N peptide showed minimal binding and retention in the ribosomal fractions (compare the banding pattern in Fig. 3, B and C, lanes 1-5).

We have previously demonstrated that, in heterologous translational systems, the requirement for EF-3 depends on the source of the 40 S subparticles (6). Based on this observation, we analyzed the protective effects of the 40 S and the 60 S subunits on the proteolysis of EF-3. The Western blot data presented in Fig. 4 indicate that both 40 S and 60 S subunits protected EF-3 from trypsin to the same extent (Fig. 4, B and C, lanes 2-5) but showed differences in the protection of C1 peptide. In spite of the functional specificity of EF-3 for the 40 S subunits (6), the C1 peptide appeared to be better protected by 60 S subunits (Fig. 4C, lanes 2-5). This, we assume, could be due to the higher binding affinity of EF-3 for the 60 S subparticles. Experimental data from the direct binding studies of EF-3 with ribosomes and subunits support this conclusion.3 In any case, intact 80 S ribosomes provided the maximum protection to EF-3 and to C1 peptide against trypsinolysis (Fig. 4D, lanes 2-5).

The specificity of EF-3/ribosome interaction was further analyzed by comparing the tryptic digestion pattern of EF-3 in the presence of yeast 80 S and E. coli 70 S ribosomes. Data presented in Fig. 5A demonstrate that neither the yeast 80 S nor the E. coli 70 S ribosomal proteins were degraded significantly under the reaction conditions used in these analyses. EF-3 was extensively degraded in the presence of E. coli ribosomes (Fig. 5A, lanes 10-13, boxed area), whereas yeast 80 S ribosomes, as expected, protected EF-3 from proteolysis. Results of the immunoblot analyses presented in Fig. 5B substantiate the same conclusion. The C1 peptide appears to be somewhat protected by E. coli ribosomes (Fig. 5B, lanes 10-12). However, compared with 80 S ribosomes, the protective effect of E. coli 70 S ribosomes is insignificant.

A molecular biological approach was taken to substantiate the experimental data obtained from the proteolytic cleavage analyses. For this, a construct was designed representing the C1 peptide containing all of the COOH-terminal basic amino acid residues of EF-3 including the three polylysine blocks (23). This construct was designated as 30-kDa YEF3. The subcloned EF-3 fragment was expressed as a GST fusion in yeast in order to facilitate separation of the truncated protein from the chromosomally expressed wild type EF-3. Subcloning, overexpression, and purification of the GST-30-kDa fusion peptide will be described elsewhere.

The localization of GST-C1 peptide in the cell-free extracts prepared from yeast overexpressing the fusion protein is shown in Fig. 6. Western blot analysis revealed the presence of two immunoreactive bands in the S-30 supernatant fraction. One of these bands has the molecular mass of 116 kDa, representing the wild type EF-3 protein. The second immunoreactive band has an approximate molecular mass of 52 kDa (22-kDa mass contributed by the GST peptide), representing the GST-C1 peptide (Fig. 6B, lane 2). The fusion peptide, like the wild type EF-3, remained associated with the ribosomal fraction (Fig. 6B, lane 4). The complete absence of fusion peptide in the postribosomal supernatant fraction (S-100) indicates that, in comparison with intact EF-3, GST-C1 peptide has high affinity for 80 S ribosomes (Fig. 6B, compare lanes 3 and 4). The stringent association of the fusion peptide with 80 S ribosomes can also be seen in the Coomassie Blue-stained gel (Fig. 6A, compare lanes 3 and 4, boxed area). The GST protein expressed from the vector lacking the C1 peptide did not bind to yeast ribosomes (data not shown). Yeast cells overexpressing the GST-C1 peptide exhibited a slow growth phenotype (data not shown). We presume that a pool of ribosomes becomes unavailable for translation due to irreversible association of the fusion peptide to yeast ribosomes.


Fig. 6. Expression of GST-C1 and its localization. The crude cell extract (S-30), postribosomal supernatant (S-100), and ribosomes isolated from yeasts expressing GST-C1 fusion peptide were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. A, Coomassie Blue-stained gel; B, immunoblot of the same gel. Lane 1, standard EF-3; lane 2, S-30; lane 3, S-100; lane 4, 80S ribosomes. Lane MW, standard protein markers. Positions of EF-3 and GST-C1 fusion peptide are indicated on the left and right in A and B, respectively.
[View Larger Version of this Image (82K GIF file)]


The binding of the purified GST fusion peptide to yeast ribosomes is shown in Fig. 7. As a control, the binding of EF-3 to 80 S ribosomes was also included in these analyses. Increasing amounts of purified fusion peptide were incubated with yeast ribosomes. The presence of the fusion peptide in the reconstituted ribosomal fractions was detected by immunoblot analysis. As can be seen, much like intact EF-3 (Fig. 7B, lane 4), isolated 30-kDa-GST fusion peptide remained bound to yeast 80 S ribosomes (Fig. 7B, lanes 5-8).


Fig. 7. Binding of GST-C1 peptide to yeast 80 S ribosomes. Binding was carried out as described under "Experimental Procedures." A, Coomassie Blue-stained gel; B, immunoblot of the same gel. Lane 1, standard EF-3; lane 2, purified GST-C1 peptide; lane 3, 80 S ribosomes; lane 4, incubation of equimolar concentrations of EF-3 and 80 S ribosomes; lanes 5-8 represent 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 pmol of GST-C1 peptide incubated with 1 pmol of 80 S ribosomes, respectively. Molecular masses of the standard proteins (lane MW) are indicated on the right. Positions of EF-3 and GST-C1 fusion peptide are indicated on the left.
[View Larger Version of this Image (93K GIF file)]



DISCUSSION

Biochemical and genetic investigations described in this communication provide evidence that the COOH-terminal end of EF-3 is involved in ribosome binding. Using proteolysis as a tool, we have demonstrated that the 116-kDa EF-3 protein is organized into two functional domains. The NH2 terminally derived large (90-kDa) subdomain of EF-3 containing the two ATP-binding cassettes is catalytically active in ribosome-independent functions. The COOH terminally derived small (30-kDa) domain retained the ribosome-binding activity. The NH2-terminal domain of EF-3 is relatively resistant to proteolysis, indicating that this part of the molecule may have a compact structural organization. On the other hand, the COOH terminally derived domain is relatively exposed and is further proteolyzed into smaller fragments.

The NH2-terminal end of the N peptide is blocked and, therefore, it was not possible to obtain the sequence information for this peptide. Amino acid glutamine was identified as the NH2-terminal residue of the C1 peptide. A cleavage between residues 774 (Arg) and 775 (Gln) is consistent with the approximate molecular masses of the two peptides. Analyses of the C2 and C3 peptides (Fig. 1) indicate that all three peptides (C1, C2, and C3) contain glutamine at the NH2-terminal end (data not shown). The proposed primary trypsin cleavage site of EF-3 is shown below.
<AR><R><C>                        (<UP>EF-3 = 116 kDa</UP>)</C></R><R><C><UP>NH<SUB>2</SUB> --------------------------------- R↓Q ----------- COOH</UP></C></R><R><C><UP>                                </UP>(<UP>90 kDa</UP>)                              (<UP>30 kDa</UP>)</C></R><R><C><UP>NH<SUB>2</SUB> --------------------------------- R Q ----------- COOH</UP></C></R></AR>
<UP><SC>Diagram 1</SC></UP>
The amino acid sequence derived from the DNA sequence data indicates that the COOH-terminal end of EF-3 is highly charged. Of the last 57 amino acid residues, 60% are charged. Of these, 40% are basic (23). The positively charged lysine and arginine residues are organized in four distinct blocks as follows: RIEKKEDEEDKFDAMGNKIAGGKKKKKLSSAELR KKKKERMKKKKELGDAYVSSDEEF. The hydropathy test of this region of EF-3 suggests that the COOH-terminal end of the protein is exposed and, therefore, may interact with negatively charged molecules such as RNA and acidic ribosomal proteins (24). We have previously demonstrated a direct interaction between EF-3 and rRNA (26). Site-specific mutational analyses are planned to identify the amino acid residues of EF-3 involved in the direct interaction with rRNA. A number of ribosomal proteins and translational factors are known to contact ribosomes through the COOH-terminal end (31, 33, 34). In that respect, yeast EF-3 seems to follow the same reaction mechanism. In the case of the bacterial elongation factor EF-G, the protein associates with ribosomes via the COOH-terminal Gln-495 and Gly-502 residues (33). Deletion or point mutations involving these amino acids severely affect the ribosome-dependent functions of bacterial EF-G (33). The basic amino acid residues in the COOH-terminal region of the yeast ribosomal protein L1 (34) and the bacterial ribosomal protein L6 (31) have been implicated as the binding sites for rRNA. In the case of yeast EF-3, the NTPase activity of the protein is enhanced 2 orders of magnitude by yeast ribosomes (6). It will be of interest to learn how information concerning the nucleotide-bound state of EF-3 is transmitted into its ribosome-binding domain (COOH-terminal domain) and its role in the conformational change of yeast ribosomes from the post- to the pretranslocational states during the peptide chain elongation reaction. An answer to this question is of fundamental importance since higher eukaryotes carry out this reaction in the absence of a physical homolog of yeast EF-3.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health and from Bayer AG, Germany.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 414-456-8440; Fax: 414-266-8497; E-mail: chakra{at}its.mcw.edu.
1   The abbreviations used are: EF, elongation factor; TPCK, L-1-tosylamido-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; GST, glutathione S-transferase.
2   K. Chakraburtty, E. Pladies, and R. Kambampati, manuscript in preparation.
3   O. Kovalchuke, E. Pladies, and K. Chakraburtty, submitted for publication.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the help of Dr. Liane Mende-Mueller of the Medical College of Wisconsin and Drs. Gary Davis and Carla Brini of Bayer Corporation for their help with the N-terminal analysis of EF-3 and the tryptic peptides; we are grateful to Dr. Karl Ziegelbauer of Bayer AG, Germany and Dr. Robert Tilton of Bayer Corporation, West Haven for many helpful discussions.


REFERENCES

  1. Miller, D. L., and Weissbach, H. (1977) in Molecular Mechanisms of Protein Biosynthesis (Weissbach, H., and Pestka, S., eds), pp. 323-373, Academic Press, New York
  2. Moldave, K. (1985) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 54, 1109-1149 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Skogerson, L., and Wakatama, E. (1976) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 73, 73-76 [Abstract]
  4. Dasmahapatra, B., and Chakraburtty, K. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 9999-10004 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Chakraburtty, K. (1992) in New Approaches for Antifungal Drugs (Fernandes, P. B., ed), pp. 114-142, Birkhauser, Inc., Boston
  6. Chakraburtty, K., and Kamath, A. (1988) Int. J. Biochem. 20, 581-590 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Triana, F. J., Nierhaus, K. H., Ziehler, J., and Chakraburtty, K. (1993) in Translational Apparatus (Nierhaus, K. H., ed), pp. 327-338, Plenum Publishing Corp., New York
  8. Triana, F. J., Nierhaus, K. H., and Chakraburtty, K. (1994) Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int. 33, 909-915 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Triana-Alonso, F. J., Chakraburtty, K., and Nierhaus, K. H. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 20473-20478 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Uritani, M., and Miyazaki, M. (1988) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 103, 522-530 [Abstract]
  11. Kovalchuke, O., and Chakraburtty, K. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 226, 133-140 [Abstract]
  12. Kovalchuke, O., Ziehler, J., and Chakraburtty, K. (1995) Biochimie 77, 713-718 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Walker, J. E., Saraste, M., Runswick, M. J., and Gay, N. J. (1982) EMBO J. 1, 945-951 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Sandbaken, M. G., Lupisella, J. A., DiDomenico, B., and Chakraburtty, K. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 15838-15844 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Qin, S., Xie, A., Bonato, M. C. M., and McLaughlin, C. S. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 1903-1912 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Snyder, S., and Chakraburtty, K. (1989) Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Translational Control, p. 43, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  17. Di Domenico, B. J., Lupisella, J., Sandbaken, M., and Chakraburtty, K. (1992) Yeast 8, 337-352 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Myers, K. K., Fonzi, W. A., and Sypherd, P. S. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 1705-1710 [Abstract]
  19. Colthurst, D. R., Schauder, B. S., Hayes, M. V., and Tuite, M. F. (1992) Mol. Microbiol. 6, 1025-1033 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Ypma-Wong, M. F., Fonzi, W. A., and Sypherd, P. S. (1992) Infect. Immun. 60, 4140-4145 [Abstract]
  21. Feinberg, B., McLaughlin, C. S., and Moldave, K. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 10846-10851 [Abstract]
  22. Kamath, A., and Chakraburtty, K. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 12596-12598 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Sandbaken, M., Lupisella, J. A., Di Domenico, B., and Chakraburtty, K. (1990) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1050, 230-234 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Belfield, G. P., and Tuite, M. F. (1993) Mol. Microbiol. 9, 411-418 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Ollis, D. L., and White, S. W. (1987) Chem. Rev. 87, 981-995
  26. Kovalchuke, O., and Chakraburtty, K. (1995) Indian J. Biochem. Biophys. 32, 336-342 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Minks, M. A., Suryanarayana, T., and Subramanian, A. R. (1978) Eur. J. Biochem. 82, 271-277 [Abstract]
  28. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Towbin, H., Staehelin, T., and Gordan, J. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 76, 4350-4354 [Abstract]
  30. Mitchell, D. A., and Deschenes, R. J. (1995) Methods Enzymol. 250, 68-78 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Golden, B. L., Ramakrishnan, V., and White, S. W. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 4901-4908 [Abstract]
  32. Gudkov, A. T., and Bubunenko, M. G. (1989) Biochimie 71, 779-785 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Hou, Y., Yaskowiak, E. S., and March, P. E. (1994) J. Bacteriol. 176, 7038-7044 [Abstract]
  34. Yeh, L.-C. C., and Lee, J. C. (1995) J. Mol. Biol. 246, 295-307 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.