COMMUNICATION:
Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-associated Factor (TRAF) 5 and TRAF2 Are Involved in CD30-mediated NFkappa B Activation*

(Received for publication, November 19, 1996)

Shigemi Aizawa , Hiroyasu Nakano Dagger , Takaomi Ishida §, Ryouichi Horie , Masae Nagai , Kinji Ito , Hideo Yagita Dagger , Ko Okumura Dagger , Junichiro Inoue § and Toshiki Watanabe

From the Department of Pathology and the § Department of Oncology, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Shirokanedai, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108, Japan and the Dagger  Department of Immunology, Juntendo University, School of Medicine, Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Corporation, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113, Japan

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Signals emanated from CD30 can activate the nuclear factor kappa B (NFkappa B). The two conserved subdomains, D1 and D2, in the C-terminal cytoplasmic region of CD30 were tested for interaction with two tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor (TRAF) proteins with NFkappa B activating capacity, TRAF2 and TRAF5. TRAF5 is the newest member of the TRAF family that binds to lymphotoxin beta  receptor and CD40. TRAF5, as well as TRAF2, interacted with the D2 subdomain of CD30 in vitro and in vivo. Deletion analysis by the yeast two-hybrid system revealed that the C-terminal 22 and 30 amino acid residues are dispensable for interaction of TRAF5 and TRAF2 with CD30, respectively. Substitution of alanine for threonine at 463 abolished the interaction with TRAF2. Overexpression of the TRAF domain of TRAF2 or TRAF5 showed a dominant negative effect on CD30-mediated NFkappa B activation. Simultaneous expression of these TRAF domains further suppressed the NFkappa B activation, suggesting an interplay of these TRAF proteins. Expression of TRAF2 and TRAF5 mRNA was demonstrated in T- and B-cell lines that express CD30. Taken together, our results indicate that TRAF2 and TRAF5 directly interact with CD30 and are involved in NFkappa B activation by CD30 signaling.


INTRODUCTION

CD30 is a member of TNF1 receptor superfamily that comprises a group of cysteine-rich receptor proteins such as CD27, CD40, and Fas antigen (1-4). Biochemical studies of CD30 as well as functional studies of the ligand for CD30 (CD30L) provided strong evidence to support regulatory roles for CD30 in lymphocytes (5-7). CD30L induces various biological effects on human CD30-positive cell lines such as activation, proliferation, differentiation, and cell death, depending on cell type, stage of differentiation, transformation status, and the presence of other stimuli (7). Recently, it was reported that CD30-deficient mice showed impaired negative selection in the thymus (8) and that CD30 is involved in signaling TCR-mediated cell death of T-cell hybridoma (9). As for signal transduction of CD30, Ellis et al. reported the induction of Ca2+ influx by cross-linking CD30 on Jurkat cells (10), and signals mediated by CD30 were seen to regulate gene expression through activation of NFkappa B (11, 12).

Because the cytoplasmic tail of receptors of the TNF receptor family does not have intrinsic catalytic activity such as kinase activity, it was considered that molecules that associate with these receptors mediate signal transduction. Putative signal transducing proteins that associate with TNF receptor type II were cloned and named TNF receptor-associated factor (TRAF) 1 and 2 (13). Subsequently, TRAF3 or CRAF1 (CD40 bp, CAP1, LAP1) was identified as the CD40 signal transducing molecule (Refs. 14-17; reviewed in Ref. 18). We have recently cloned TRAF5 that associates with lymphotoxin beta  receptor and CD40 and mediates NFkappa B activating signals (19, 20).

We have found that an approximately 100-amino acid sequence of the C-terminal region of the CD30 cytoplasmic region was highly conserved among human, rat, and mouse CD30 protein, and in this region there are two subdomains with a higher conservation (D1 and D2) (21). Recently, the association of TRAF1, 2, and 3 with the cytoplasmic tail of CD30 has been reported, and the binding sites were characterized (22). However, it has remained to be determined whether and how these TRAF proteins are involved in NFkappa B activation by CD30. To better understand the CD30 signal transduction pathway that leads to NFkappa B activation, we asked whether TRAF5, as well as TRAF2 are involved in CD30 signaling. We found that TRAF5, as was shown for TRAF2, directly associates with the D2 subdomain of the CD30 cytoplasmic tail, and both TRAF2 and TRAF5 are involved in the signal transduction leading to NFkappa B activation.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

GST Fusion Protein and in Vitro Binding Assay

GST fusion protein was prepared using the pGEX series of GST fusion protein vectors (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.). The cDNA fragments encoding regions covering both or either of the two conserved subdomains (D1 and D2) of the CD30 cytoplasmic tail of human (2), mouse (23), and rat (21) were prepared by PCR using primers with extra sequences for restriction enzyme digestion. These were named GST-hCD30 (D1+D2) (amino acids 459-595), GST-mCD30 (D1+D2) (amino acids 388-498), GST-rCD30 (D1+D2) (amino acids 383-493), GST-rCD30D2 (amino acids 426-493), and GST-rCD30D1 (amino acids 383-445). GST and GST fusion proteins were prepared by standard methods (24). In vitro transcription and translation was performed using the TNT in vitro translation system (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instruction. In vitro binding analysis was done as described previously (19). The gels were dried and analyzed on a BAS 2000 image analyzer (Fuji Film).

In Vivo Binding Assay

Transient cotransfection and coprecipitation analyses were done using 293T cells. For these experiments, an expression vector for human CD30 (pME-hCD30) was prepared using an SRalpha -driven pME18S plasmid (a gift from Dr. K Maruyama). Expression vectors for human CD30 with C-terminal deletions of 47, 95, and 132 amino acids were also prepared using PCR and pCR3TM eukaryotic TA cloning vector (In vitrogen), and named pCR-hCD30(Delta D2), pCR-hCD30(Delta D1+D2), and phCD(Delta 132), respectively. These deletion mutants lack the D2 subdomain or both D1 and D2 subdomains at the C terminus (21), respectively. Those for mouse TRAF2 and TRAF5 tagged with FLAG were prepared using pME18S and PCR-amplified cDNA fragments encompassing the protein coding region. The resultant plasmids were named pMEFLAG-TRAF2 and pMEFLAG-TRAF5, respectively. The 293T cells were cotransfected with 1 µg each of expression vectors of these human CD30 and FLAG-tagged TRAF5 or TRAF2, using LipofectinTM reagent (Life Technologies, Inc.). The cell lysates were first immunoprecipitated with anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody BerH2 (DAKO), and the immnunoprecipitates were analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-FLAG M2 antibody (Eastman Kodak) or immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG M2 antibody and detected by BerH2 using an ECLTM chemiluminescence detection kit (Amersham Corp.).

Yeast Two-hybrid System

For cotransformation assays in a yeast two-hybrid system, DNA encoding the rat CD30 intracellular domain (amino acids 308-493) (21) was cloned into the yeast Gal4-DNA binding domain vector pAS1-CYH2 (a gift from Dr. J. W. Harper) (25) (pAS-rCD30IC) and used to test interaction with the TRAF family proteins. Bait plasmids with a series of C-terminal deletion of the CD30 cytoplasmic region were prepared to map the binding regions. These plasmids were named pAS-rCD30Delta 22, pAS-rCD30Delta 30, pAS-rCD30Delta 36, pAS-rCD30Delta 51, pAS-rCD30Delta 67, pAS-rCD30Delta 81, and pAS-rCD30Delta 97, where the numbers following Delta  indicate the number of deleted amino acids. Gal4 activation domain plasmids having TRAF domains of TRAF2 or TRAF5 were pACT-TRAF2D (amino acids 274-501) and pACT-TRAF5D (amino acids 223-558).

Reporter Gene Assays

Expression plasmids of mouse TRAF2 and TRAF5 were prepared using the pCRTM3 eukaryotic TA cloning vector (Invitrogen) and PCR-amplified cDNA fragments encompassing the protein coding region. The resultant plasmids were named pCR-TRAF2 and pCR-TRAF5, respectively. Using the same method, those for truncated TRAF proteins retaining only the TRAF domain were prepared. The resultant plasmids (pCR-TRAF2D and pCR-TRAF5D) encode amino acids 269-501 and 233-558, respectively. For CAT assays, 1 µg of the reporter plasmid, [kappa B]6TK-CAT or [kappa Bm]6TK-CAT (20), 1 µg of beta -galactosidase expression vector driven by the beta -actin promoter (beta -actin-beta -gal), and 1 µg of pME-hCD30, pCR-TRAF2, pCR-TRAF2D, pCR-TRAF5, or pCR-TRAF5D were cotransfected with LipofectinTM reagent (Life Technologies, Inc.). The total amount of DNA transfected was always adjusted to 5 µg with control expression vectors, pME18S, or pCRTM3. 40 h after transfection, cell extracts were prepared by three cycles of freeze-thawing followed by centrifugation. beta -Galactosidase activity was used to standardize transfection efficiency. CAT assays were performed using a fluor diffusion method (26).


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Signaling from CD30 was shown to activate NFkappa B; however, transducers of this signal have not been well characterized. On the other hand, two TRAF proteins, TRAF2 and TRAF5, were proven to have NFkappa B activating capacity. Therefore, study of the involvement of TRAF2 and TRAF5 in NFkappa B activation by CD30 is needed to better understand the biological functions of CD30. We reported that an approximately 100-amino acid sequence is highly conserved between rat and human CD30, and we have tentatively divided this region into two subdomains, D1 and D2 (21). These observations also held true for the mouse CD30 (23), thereby suggesting the functional importance of these subdomains (Fig. 1A). Moreover, it was shown that TRAF1, 2, and 3 interact with CD30 through binding sites in C-terminal 36 amino acids (22), which signifies that these TRAF proteins bind to the region containing the C-terminally located D2 subdomain. To determine if TRAF5 binds to CD30 and if so which of the subdomains are involved in the binding, we examined interactions of TRAF5, along with TRAF2, with CD30 in vitro and in vivo. First we examined in vitro binding using the CD30 cytoplasmic region fused to glutathione S-transferase and in vitro translated TRAF proteins. We constructed GST fusion proteins of CD30 having both or either one of them (Fig. 1A). GST fusion proteins with two subdomains were GST-hCD30(D1+D2) that has the C-terminal 136 amino acids of human CD30, and GST-mCD30(D1+D2) and GST-rCD30(D1+D2) that have C-terminal 110 amino acids of mouse and rat CD30, respectively. GST-rCD30 (D2) and GST-rCD30 (D1) have either of the subdomains of the rat CD30. Affinity purified GST fusion proteins were tested for their potential to precipitate 35S-labeled in vitro translated full-length mouse TRAF2 and TRAF5. As shown in Fig. 1B, both TRAF2 and TRAF5 were precipitated by GST-CD30 proteins having both D1 and D2 subdomains of human, mouse, or rat origin, they interacted with the CD30 GST fusion protein possessing the D2 subdomain but not with that having the D1 subdomain. Thus, it was suggested that TRAF5, as well as TRAF2, interacts with CD30 through the binding site(s) in the D2 subdomain.


Fig. 1. In vitro interaction of TRAF2 and TRAF5 with CD30. A, conserved domains at the C-terminal region of the human, mouse, and rat CD30 proteins and schematic presentation of GST fusion proteins of CD30. Amino acid sequences of the cytoplasmic region of the human, mouse, and rat CD30 were compared by the Best Fit program of the Genetics Computer Group (28). About 100 amino acids at the C termini show a high conservation among three species. Two subdomains with a higher homology in this region are tentatively named as D1 and D2. GST-hCD30(D1+D2) has the C-terminal 136 amino acids of the human CD30. GST-mCD30 (D1+D2) and GST-rCD30(D1+D2) proteins have the C-terminal 110 amino acids of the mouse and rat CD30. GST-rCD30(D2) and GST-rCD30(D1) have D2 or D1 subdomain, respectively. B, in vitro interaction of TRAF2 and TRAF5 with the CD30 cytoplasmic tail. [35S]Methionine-labeled TRAF2 or TRAF5 protein was incubated with GST fusion proteins. Following incubation and washing, the GST beads were boiled in SDS sample buffer and resolved on a 10% polyacrylamide gel, and bound protein was visualized by BAS 2000. GST fusion proteins incubated with in vitro translated TRAF proteins are shown above the figure.
[View Larger Version of this Image (46K GIF file)]


To confirm this proposal, we next examined the interaction of CD30 with TRAF5 and TRAF2 by cotransfection and coprecipitation analysis. Human CD30 and deletion mutants were coexpressed with FLAG-tagged TRAF5 or TRAF2 in 293T cells. CD30 proteins were immunoprecipitated from cell lysates using the BerH2 anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody (DAKO), and the immune complexes were analyzed for the presence of FLAG-TRAF5 or FLAG-TRAF2 by immunoblotting using anti-FLAG M2 antibody (Eastman Kodak). The BerH2 anti-CD30 antibody co-immunoprecipitated TRAF2 and TRAF5 from the cells transfected with wild type CD30 cDNA. However, deletion of the D2 subdomain or both D1 and D2 subdomains abrogated the precipitation of either TRAF2 or TRAF5 (Fig. 2, upper panel). Conversely, the anti-FLAG M2 antibody co-immunoprecipitated only the wild type CD30 but not the deletion mutants with co-expressed TRAF2 or TRAF5 (Fig. 2, lower panel). Expression of the transfected CD30 proteins, as well as FLAG-tagged TRAF 2 and TRAF5, was confirmed by immunoblotting with BerH2 or anti-FLAG M2 antibody (data not shown). Taken together, these results indicated that TRAF5 can interact with the CD30 cytoplasmic tail through the C-terminal region containing the D2 subdomain in vivo.


Fig. 2. In vivo association of TRAF proteins with the CD30 protein. Cell lysates of 293T cells transfected with TRAF2 or TRAF5 and CD30 constructs indicated above the figure were immunoprecipitated with anti-CD30 BerH2 antibody, and the immune complexes were analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-FLAG M2 antibody (upper panel) or immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG M2 antibody and detected by BerH2 antibody (lower panel). The hCD30wt encodes wild type CD30; hCD30(Delta D2) construct lacks the D2 subdomain; and hCD30(Delta D1+D2) and hCD30(Delta 132) lack both D1 and D2 subdomains. Positions of the FLAG-tagged TRAF2 and TRAF5, as well as that of CD30, are indicated on the right. Numbers on the right indicates positions of molecular weight markers.
[View Larger Version of this Image (58K GIF file)]


To further map the binding sites of CD30, deletion studies were done using the yeast two-hybrid system. The yeasts were cotransformed with plasmids that express wild type and various C-terminal deletion mutants of rat CD30 along with TRAF2 or TRAF5 expression vector and then assayed for their potential to grow on medium lacking leucine and tryptophan and for beta -galactosidase activity. The TRAF domain of TRAF5 as well as that of TRAF2 interacted with the cytoplasmic domain of CD30 (Fig. 3A). However, deletion of the C-terminal 30 amino acids that removes one-third of the D2 subdomain abolished the binding to TRAF5 protein, whereas this construct retained the potential to interact with TRAF2 protein. Deletion of 36 amino acids that removes half of the D2 subdomain, as well as deletion of the whole D2 subdomain, abolished the interaction with both the TRAF proteins. Gedrich et al. identified two binding sites of the human CD30 for TRAF1, 2, and 3, the PEQET and EEEGKE sequences, that are located at 462-466 and 480-485, respectively (22). Thus, the above results indicated that the PEQET sequence alone is sufficient for interaction with TRAF2 but not with TRAF5 and suggested that the EPPLGSC sequence (464-470) is required for TRAF5 binding. A similar sequence PXQXT is also present in the binding domain of CD40 to TRAF3.


Fig. 3. Mapping of the binding region in the CD30 cytoplasmic tail by the yeast two-hybrid system. A, structure of the bait constructs of CD30 mutants and beta -galactosidase activity. Schematic representation of the rat CD30 protein and its deletion mutants are shown on the left. The amino acid number in the cytoplasmic region is indicated on the top of each bar. Numbers following Delta  indicate those amino acids deleted from the C terminus. beta -Galactosidase activity of the each trasformants are indicated on the right. + and - indicate positive and negative beta -galactosidase activity, respectively. B, effect of amino acid substitution of CD30 on interaction with TRAF2 and TRAF5. beta -Galactosidase activity is shown on the right.
[View Larger Version of this Image (17K GIF file)]


The threonine residue at position 254 of CD40 was shown to be important for binding to TRAF3 (14) and for biological functions. We next examined the effect of amino acid substitution at 463 for interaction with TRAF2. Substitution of alanine for threonine deprived the mutant protein CD30Delta 30A of the potential to interact with TRAF2 (Fig. 3B), suggesting that the threonine residue in the PEQET binding sequence is essential for biological activity of CD30 and that this threonine residue may have functional similarities with threonine 254 in CD40 (27).

Because we have previously demonstrated that TRAF5 can activate NFkappa B (19, 20), the results in the present study indicated that both the two TRAF proteins with NFkappa B activating capacity, TRAF2 and TRAF5, interact with CD30. Because signals from CD30 have been shown to activate NFkappa B and induce gene expression (11, 12), we asked if TRAF2 and TRAF5 are involved in NFkappa B activation. We performed a reporter gene assay using [kappa B]6TK-CAT and [kappa Bm]6TK-CAT plasmids and expression vectors for CD30 and full size or N-terminally truncated TRAF2 or TRAF5 that lacks ring finger and zinc finger domains. We first confirmed that overexpression of TRAF2 or TRAF5 alone resulted in a 4.1- or 4.8-fold induction of CAT activity, in a kappa B site-dependent manner (Fig. 4A). On the other hand, the overexpression of CD30 alone showed about a 9-fold induction of CAT activity, also in a kappa B site-dependent manner (Fig. 4B). Cotransfection of CD30 and the TRAF domain of TRAF2 or TRAF5 suppressed CD30-mediated NFkappa B activation by 66 or 39%, respectively (Fig. 4B), indicating the dominant negative effect of TRAF domain overexpression. Simultaneous expression of TRAF domains of TRAF2 and TRAF5 further suppressed CD30-mediated NFkappa B activation by 80%, thereby suggesting that both of these proteins are involved in signal transduction of CD30.


Fig. 4. Dominant negative effect of TRAF domains of TRAF2 and TRAF5 on CD30-mediated NFkappa B activation. A, NFkappa B site-dependent activation of CAT activity by TRAF2 and TRAF5. The level of activation was expressed as fold activation compared with the activity in the absence of effecter plasmids. Lanes 1 and 3, cotransfection of TRAF2 or TRAF5; lanes 2 and 4, cotransfection of an empty vector. Bars indicate the standard deviation in triplicated experiments. B, dominant negative effect of TRAF domains of TRAF2 and TRAF5. Reporter CAT plasmid, [kappa B]6CAT, was cotransfected with effecter plasmids indicated below the figure. Bars indicate the standard deviation in triplicated experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (43K GIF file)]


CD30 is expressed in activated T-cells as well as lymphocytes infected with human T-cell lymphotrophic virus-1 or EBV; therefore, we examined the expression of TRAF2 and TRAF5 in lymphocytes by Northern blot analysis. A panel of B- and T-lymphocyte cell lines, some of which are infected with human T-cell lymphotrophic virus-1 or EBV, were included in the study. We found that TRAF2 and TRAF5 transcripts were expressed in all the cell lines tested. CD30 mRNA was also expressed in these cell lines, except for EBV noninfected BJAB and Ramos cells (data not shown). Colocalization of expression provided further supportive evidence for the involvement of TRAF5 and TRAF2 in CD30 signal transduction.

These results demonstrate for the first time the involvement of TRAF2 and TRAF5 in NFkappa B activation by CD30. Direct interaction of TRAF5 with the C-terminal end of the CD30 protein and involvement of TRAF2 and TRAF5 in CD30-mediated NFkappa B activation underline the complexity of interplay between the TRAF family proteins in the signal transduction of CD30 and may explain the pleiotropic biological activity mediated by CD30-CD30L interaction. Stoichiometric studies of the interaction will be needed to analyze the interplay of TRAF proteins and determine the roles played by individual TRAF proteins during CD30 signal transduction.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture, Japan (to T. W.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
   To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pathology, Inst. of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Shirokanedai, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108, Japan. Tel.: 81-3-5449-5298; Fax: 81-3-5449-5418; E-mail: tnabe{at}ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
1    The abbreviations used are: TNF, tumor necrosis factor; TRAF, tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor; GST, glutathione S-transferase; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; CD30L, ligand for CD30; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; EBV, Epstein-Barr virus.

Acknowledgments

We thank M. Ohara for helpful comments on the manuscript and Carl F. Ware for sharing unpublished results.


REFERENCES

  1. Falini, B., Pileri, S., Pizzolo, G., Dürkop, H., Flenghi, L., Stirpe, F., Martelli, M. F., and Stein, H. (1995) Blood 85, 1-14 [Free Full Text]
  2. Dürkop, H., Latza, U., Hummel, M., Eitelbach, F., Seed, B., and Stein, H. (1992) Cell 68, 421-427 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Smith, C. A., Farrah, T., and Goodwin, R. G. (1994) Cell 76, 959-962 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Beutler, B., and van Huffel, C. (1994) Science 264, 667-668 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Nawrocki, J. F., Kirstein, E. S., and Fisher, R. I. (1988) J. Immunol. 141, 672-680 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Smith, C. A., Gruss, H. J., Davis, T., Anderson, D., Farrah, T., Baker, E., Sutherland, G. R., Branann, C. I., Copeland, N. G., Jenkins, N. A., Grabstein, K. H., Gliniak, B., McAlister, I. B., Fanslow, W., Alderson, M., Falk, B., Gimpel, S., Gillis, S., Din, W. S., Goodwin, R. G., and Armitage, R. J. (1993) Cell 73, 1349-1360 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Grüss, H. J., Boiani, N., Williams, D. E., Armitage, R. J., Smith, C. A., and Goodwin, R. G. (1994) Blood 83, 2045-2056 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Amakawa, R., Hakem, A., Kundig, T. M., Matsuyama, T., Simard, J. J. L., Timms, E., Wakeham, A., Mittruecker, H. W., Griesser, H., Takimoto, H., Schmits, R., Shahinian, A., Ohashi, P. S., Penninger, J. M., and Mak, T. W. (1996) Cell 84, 551-562 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Lee, S. Y., Park, C. G., and Choi, Y. (1996) J. Exp. Med. 183, 669-674 [Abstract]
  10. Ellis, T. M., Simms, P. E., Slivnick, D. J., Jäck, H.-M., and Fisher, R. I. (1993) J. Immunol. 151, 2380-2389 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Biswas, P., Smith, C. A., Goletti, D., Hardy, E. C., Jackson, R. W., and Fauci, A. S. (1995) Immunity 2, 587-596 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Maggi, E., Annunziato, F., Manetti, R., Biagiotti, R., Giudizi, M. G., Ravina, A., Almerigogna, F., Boiani, N., Alderson, M., and Romagniani, S. (1995) Immunity 3, 251-255 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Rothe, M., Wong, S. C., Henzel, W. J., and Goeddel, D. V. (1994) Cell 78, 681-692 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Hu, H. M., O'Rourke, K., Boguski, M. S., and Dixit, V. M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 30069-30072 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Cheng, G., Cleary, A. M., Ye, Z. S., Hong, D. I., Lederman, S., and Baltimore, D. (1995) Science 267, 1494-1498 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Mosialos, G., Birkenbach, M., Yalamanchili, R., VanArsdale, T., Ware, C., and Kief, E. (1995) Cell 80, 389-399 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Sato, T., Irie, S., and Reed, J. C. (1995) FEBS Lett. 358, 113-118 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Barker, S. J., and Reddy, E. P. (1996) Oncogene 12, 1-9 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Nakano, H., Oshima, H., Chung, W., Williams-Abott, L., Ware, C. F., Yagita, H., and Okumura, K. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 14661-14664 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Ishida, T., Tojo, T., Aoki, T, Kobayashi, N., Oishi, T, Watanabe, T., Yamamoto, T., and Inoue, J. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 9437-9442 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Aizawa, S., Satoh, H., Horie, R., Ito, K., Choi, S. H., Takeuchi, H., and Watanabe, T. (1996) Gene (Amst.), in press
  22. Gedrich, R. W., Gilfillan, M. C., Ducket, C. S., Van Dongen, J. L., and Thompson, C. B. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 12852-12858 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Bowen, M. A., Lee, R. K., Miragliotta, G., Nam, S. Y., and Podack, E. R. (1996) J. Immunol. 156, 442-449 [Abstract]
  24. Smith, D. B., and Johnson, K. S. (1988) Gene (Amst.) 67, 31-40 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Harper, J. W., Adami, G. R., Wei, N., Keyomarsi, K., and Elledge, S. J. (1993) Cell 75, 805-816 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Purschke, W. G., and Müller, P. K. (1994) BioTechniques 16, 264-269 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Inui, S., Kaisho, T., Kikutani, H., Stamenkovic, I., Seed, B., Clark, E. A., and Kishimoto, T. (1990) Eur. J. Immunol. 20, 1747-1753 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Pearson, W. R., and Lipman, D. J. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 2444-2448 [Abstract]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.