Permissive Role of Nitric Oxide in Endothelin-induced Migration of Endothelial Cells*

(Received for publication, March 28, 1996, and in revised form, July 30, 1996)

Eisei Noiri , Yu Hu , Wadie F. Bahou , Charles R. Keese , Ivar Giaever and Michael S. Goligorsky Dagger

From the Department of Medicine, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York 11794-8152 and Rensellaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180-3590

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Endothelin (ET) synthesis is enhanced at sites of ischemia or in injured vessels. The purpose of this study was to explore the possibility of autocrine stimulation of endothelial cell migration by members of the endothelin family. Experiments with microvascular endothelial cell transmigration in a Boyden chemotactic apparatus showed that endothelins 1 and 3, as well as a selective agonist of ETB receptor IRL-1620, equipotently stimulated migration. Endothelial cell migration was unaffected by the blockade of ETA receptor, but it was inhibited by ETB receptor antagonism. Based on our previous demonstration of signaling from the occupied ETB receptor to constitutive nitric oxide (NO) synthase (Tsukahara, H., Ende, H., Magazine, H. I., Bahou, W. F., and Goligorsky, M. S. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 21778-21785), we next examined the contribution of ET-stimulated NO production to endothelial cell migration. In three independent cellular systems, 1) migration and wound healing by microvascular endothelial cells, 2) wound healing by Chinese hamster ovary cells stably expressing ETB receptor with or without endothelial NO synthase, and 3) application of antisense oligodeoxynucleotides targeting endothelial NO synthase in human umbilical vein endothelial cells, an absolute requirement for the functional NO synthase in cell migration has been demonstrated. These findings establish the permissive role of NO synthesis in endothelin-stimulated migration of endothelial cells.


INTRODUCTION

Formation of new blood vessels, driven by the morphogenetic program and/or by the functional demand for increased blood supply, is initiated by the budding of endothelial cells off the microcirculatory bed. Tissue hypoxia represents a physiologic stimulus for angiogenesis, and several autocrine angiogenic mediators produced by endothelial cells have been recognized (1-3). Endothelin, one of such mediators, is constitutively produced by endothelial cells and its production is enhanced by hypoxia (4-6). Two investigative teams have recently demonstrated that ET-11 and ET-3, acting via the ETB receptor, stimulate endothelial cell migration and proliferation (7, 8). Since we and others have previously demonstrated that occupancy of ETB receptors in endothelial cells is accompanied by the activation of constitutive endothelial NO synthase (9, 10), we hypothesized that the observed motogenic effects of members of the ET family may in fact be mediated by the release of NO. Indeed, there is emerging evidence that NO release serves as a prerequisite for epithelial and endothelial cell motility (11-13). Leibovich et al. (13) have shown that production of angiogenic activity by activated monocytes (assayed by chemotaxis of endothelial cells and corneal angiogenesis) is absolutely dependent on L-arginine and NO synthase. These observations are in concert with findings reported by Ziche et al. (12) who detected the potentiation by sodium nitroprusside of the angiogenic effect of substance P in the rabbit cornea. Our own observations expand this function to the classical angiogenic signal, vascular endothelial growth factor. We demonstrated that endogenous NO production by the endothelial cells is a prerequisite for the motogenic and angiogenic effects of this factor.2 In the present study, we used three different approaches (migration and wound healing by endothelial cells, wound healing by Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing ETB receptor with or without eNOS, and application of antisense oligodeoxynucleotides targeting eNOS) to provide evidence that the effect of ET-1 on cell migration is mediated via ETB receptor and requires functional enzymatic machinery for NO generation.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell Culture and Reagents

Renal microvascular endothelial cells (RMVEC) were previously established and characterized (15). This cell line shows expression of receptors for acetylated low density lipoprotein, staining with an antibody to von Willebrand antigen, and capillary tube formation. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were isolated according to the previously established technique (9, 16). RMVEC were grown in gelatin-coated dishes in M199 culture medium (Mediatech, Washington, D. C.) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (HyClone Laboratories, Logan, UT), 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Life Technologies, Inc.) HUVEC were cultured in M199 supplemented with 100 µg/ml heparin, 30 µg/ml endothelial cell growth factor, and 10% fetal bovine serum. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) and endothelin-3 (ET-3) were purchased from Calbiochem. IRL-1620, BQ123, and BQ788 were generously provided by Dr. Magazine (Queens College, Flushing, NY). NG-Nitro L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) was obtained from Bachem California (Torrance, CA), and S-nitroso-N-acetyl-DL-penicillamine was purchased from Molecular Probes, Inc. (Eugene, OR).

Functional Expression of ETBR and eNOS in CHO Cells

The generation and characterization of individual cell lines used in this study have been detailed previously (9). Briefly, CHO-ETB cell cultures stably integrated copies of the ETBR cDNA cloned, and the amplified insert encompassing the ETB open reading frame was digested with PstI, gel-purified, and ligated into the eukaryotic expression plasmid pMT2. This plasmid is driven by the adenovirus major late promoter and contains the sequences encoding murine dihydrofolate reductase immediately downstream of the cDNA insert, thereby allowing for the establishment of stably integrated cell lines with greatly amplified copy numbers when propagated in the presence of methotrexate (17). Dihydrofolate reductase-deficient CHO cells (18) were propagated in nucleoside-free Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium (Sigma), supplemented with 10% dialyzed fetal calf serum, and subsequently plated at a density of 5 × 105/100 mm2 dish. Cells were transfected with 30 µg of pMT2-ETB or pMT2-wild type using the calcium phosphate transfection method of Chen and Okayama (19). After 5 days, selection and amplification were initiated by supplementation of the media with 0.02 µM methotrexate and cells were cloned by limiting dilution. Resistant colonies were subsequently expanded and simultaneously screened for stable integration by genomic hybridization using the 32P-radiolabeled ETB cDNA as probe and for functional expression using fluorescence mapping with biotinylated highly specific ligand, IRL-1620, as previously detailed (9).

For double transfectants, CHO-ETB cells were retransfected with the cDNA for endothelial cell-derived NOS (20) (kindly supplied by Dr. K. D. Bloch) using the eukaryotic expression plasmid pMEP4 (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA), which contains an inherent hygromycin B resistance gene and an inducible metallothionein promoter upstream from the NOS cloning site. Stable transfectants (CHO-ETBNOS) were selected using culture medium supplemented with 300 µg/ml hygromycin B (1000 units/mg, Sigma). Resistant colonies were ring cloned, propagated, and functionally evaluated for NO expression using an NO-selective electrode, as detailed previously (9). NOS expression was maximized by supplementation of the medium with 50 µM ZnCl2 for 5 h prior to functional measurements.

Cell Migration Assay

Migration assay was performed according to the previously described technique (22), with minor modifications, in a Boyden chemotactic apparatus (Neuroprobe, Cabin John, MD). RMVEC were lifted with 0.05% trypsin, 0.53 mM EDTA (Life Technologies, Inc.) and washed, and 106 cells/ml suspended in 25 µl of M199 with 0.1% bovine serum albumin were added to the lower chamber of a Boyden apparatus. Polycarbonate filters with 8-µm pores (Poretics Corporation, Livermore, CA) were coated with 10 µg/ml ProNectin F (Protein Polymer Technologies, San Diego, CA), washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline, and positioned above the wells of the lower chemotactic chamber which contained cells. The top half of the chamber was reattached, and the chamber was incubated in an inverted position at 37 °C in 95% air + 5% CO2 for 2 h to allow a uniform cell attachment to the filter. The test agents, as specified under "Results," or a vehicle suspended in 50 µl of M199 with 0.1% bovine serum albumin were added to upper chambers. The chambers were wrapped with Parafilm and incubated for an additional 6 h in an upright position. After incubation, the filter was removed from the apparatus, and cells were fixed with methanol and stained with Dff-Quick (Baxter, Miami, FL). The number of migrated cells on the upper surface of the filter was counted in six randomly chosen fields under × 400 magnification and averaged. All experiments were performed in quadruplicate, and each experiment was repeated at least three times.

Monitoring of NO Release

RMVEC or HUVEC grown in gelatin-coated 35-mm dishes were preincubated in Krebs-Ringer buffer of the following composition (in mM): NaCl 136, KCl 5.4, CaCl2 1.8, MgSO4 0.8, NaH2PO4 1.0, HEPES 10, and 1 g/liter glucose, adjusted to pH 7.4, which was supplemented with 7.5 units/ml superoxide dismutase (Sigma). NO release was monitored with an NO-selective microprobe (Inter Medical Co., Nagoya, Japan), as previously detailed (11). Tip diameter of the probe (25 µm) permitted the use of a micromanipulator (Zeiss-Eppendorff) attached to the stage of an inverted microscope (Nikon Diaphot) and enclosed in a Faraday's chamber to position the sensor approximately 5 µm above the cell surface. Calibration of the electrochemical sensor was performed using different concentrations of a nitrosothiol NO donor S-nitroso-N-acetyl-DL-penicillamine, as previously detailed (23).

Wound Healing Assays

Electrode fabrication and the design of electric cell-substrate impedance sensor, a device that detects with high precision the electrical resistance of cells cultured inside small wells on the surface of a miniature gold electrode, have been reported previously (24, 25). Electrodes were precoated with 10 µg/ml fibronectin (Collaborative Biomedical Products, Bedford, MA). Endothelial cells at the density of 2 × 105 were resuspended in Basal Medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) supplemented with 0.1% bovine serum albumin, 250 µM L-arginine (Sigma), and 100 units/ml penicillin 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and seeded on electrodes. To generate "wounds" on the surface of microelectrodes, confluent endothelial monolayers were electropermeabilized with direct current from a 6-V battery generating a local electrical current of 0.12 mA. This procedure resulted in a loss of cells from the surface of the microelectrode, while all surrounding cells remained intact. The rate of repopulation of the microelectrode with migrating cells was monitored for 20 h as changes in resistance and capacitance. Alternatively, uniform wounds were generated using a laser beam. CHO-ETB and CHO-ETBNOS cell monolayers grown on glass coverslips for 2 days were exposed to a wounding procedure as previously detailed (11). Wounds were produced using a single pulse generated by a YAG laser (Coherent 7900, Palo Alto, CA) with energy of 6.5-7.5 mJ. Cell monolayers were arranged perpendicularly to and in the focal plane of the beam (using a micromanipulator, these parameters were kept constant between different experiments). After wounding, the medium was immediately changed to Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin supplemented with 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. After the wounding, images were recorded immediately and 3 and 6 h later and stored for analysis (Universal Imaging Corp., West Chester, PA). The surface area of wounds in the consecutive images was measured, the size of the initial wound was expressed as 100%, and the timed progression of wound healing was expressed as fractions of the initial size.

Antisense Oligodeoxynucleotide Treatments

The antisense phosphorothioate derivatives of oligodeoxynucleotides (S-ODN) to the human endothelial constitutive NO synthase (eNOS) 5'-[AGT TGC CCA TGT TAC TGT GCG TCC GTC]-3', nucleotides 56-30 of human eNOS cDNA (20), as well as the sense 5'-[GAC GGA CGC ACA GTA ACA TGG GCA ACT]-3' and scrambled 5'-[CTG GGA CCT GTT CGT ACA GGT CTC TTC]-3' phosphorothioate sequences were synthesized using an automated solid-phase DNA synthesizer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). These sequences included the 5'-untranslated region of eNOS cDNA and initiation codon. Thus designed sequences showed no homology with other known mammalian sequences deposited in the GenBank data base, as screened using a Blast program (21). All the S-ODNs were purified using oligonucleotide purification cartridges, dried down, resuspended in Tris-EDTA (10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0), and quantified spectrophotometrically.

Prior to migration assays, HUVEC were incubated with 10 µM S-ODNs for 12 h under a serum-free condition. During typical experiments in a Boyden chemotactic chamber (see above), S-ODNs were present in the medium. In parallel experiments, companion HUVEC treated with 10 µM S-ODNs in the serum-free medium were seeded on gelatin-coated coverslips, allowed to attach, and used to verify their responsiveness to ET-1 (1 nM) by monitoring NO release or were stained with monoclonal antibodies directed against eNOS (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY), according to the previously described protocol (11).


RESULTS

Motogenic Effect of Endothelin Is Mediated via ETB Receptor and Is NO-dependent

With regard to NO release and locomotive responses, RMVEC displayed sensitivity to ET-1 within the physiologic concentration range (Fig. 1). ET-1 stimulated NO production by RMVEC, and L-NAME blunted NO release in a dose-dependent manner, with 2 mM L-NAME resulting in complete inhibition of NO release (Fig. 1A). Transwell migration of RMVEC, studied in a modified Boyden chamber, showed the similar exquisite sensitivity to ET-1. A statistically significant almost 50% increase in the number of migrated cells was detected with ET-1 concentrations of 10 pM, and it almost doubled with further elevation of ET-1 concentration to 1 nM (Fig. 1B). Inhibition of NO synthase with 2 mM L-NAME completely abrogated the ET-1-induced cell migration. Under the conditions of NOS inhibition, endothelial cell migration could be restored in the presence of 8-bromo-cyclic GMP (100 µM), as shown in Fig. 2.


Fig. 1. Responsiveness of microvascular endothelial cells to ET-1. A, nitric oxide release was detected with NO-selective microelectrode, as detailed under "Materials and Methods." Where indicated, cells were pretreated with the specified concentrations of L-NAME for 10 min prior to the application of ET-1. Note that the effects of 1 nM ET-1 were virtually abolished with 2 mM L-NAME. Arrowhead denotes the time of ET-1 additions. Tracings are representative of 3-4 separate experiments. B, transwell migration of microvascular endothelial cells in the absence of ET-1 and in the presence of 1 pM - 1 nM ET-1. At concentrations above 10 pM, ET-1 resulted in increased migration of endothelial cells (* denotes p < 0.05 versus control). Pretreatment with 2 mM L-NAME abolished the effect of ET-1 (** denotes p < 0.05 versus control (C) and 1 nM ET-1 alone).
[View Larger Version of this Image (25K GIF file)]



Fig. 2. Blockade of ET-1-induced endothelial cell migration with L-NAME and reversal of this effect with 8-bromo-cyclic GMP. Experiments were performed in a Boyden apparatus. Transmigration was initiated with 1 nM ET-1 in the presence of 2 mM L-NAME with or without 100 µM 8-bromo-cyclic GMP.
[View Larger Version of this Image (57K GIF file)]


To elucidate the type of ET receptor(s) involved in the observed stimulation of RMVEC migration, transwell migration experiments were performed with different endothelins and in the presence of selective inhibitors of their receptors. As summarized in Fig. 3, ET-1 and ET-3 were equipotent in stimulating endothelial cell migration. A selective ETBR agonist, IRL-1620 exhibited a similar stimulatory effect, suggesting that the observed phenomena were mediated via ETBR. This conclusion is further supported by the observation that a selective ETA receptor antagonist BQ123 did not affect ET-1-induced endothelial cell transmigration, whereas a selective ETBR antagonist BQ788 completely abrogated the stimulatory action of ET-1. These findings were in concert with ET-1-induced NO release. While BQ123 did not interfere with NO production by endothelial cells stimulated with 1 nM ET-1, pretreatment with BQ788 abrogated NO release in response to ET-1 but not to bradykinin (Fig. 4). It is therefore concluded that ET-1 induces endothelial cell migration via the ETBR and that the previously demonstrated coupling of this receptor to eNOS (9) is critical for NO production and cell migration.


Fig. 3. Effect of endothelin receptor-selective agonists and antagonists on endothelial cell migration. Note that ET-1, IRL-1620, and ET-3 (1 nM each) were equipotent in stimulating transwell migration. A, blockade of ETA receptor (BQ123) did not prevent the ET-1-induced cell migration. In contrast, ETB receptor antagonist, BQ788, abolished ET-1- or ET-3-induced transmigration. * denotes p < 0.05 versus control.
[View Larger Version of this Image (25K GIF file)]



Fig. 4. ET-1-induced NO release by microvascular endothelial cells is inhibited with BQ788 but not with BQ123. NO was monitored with a selective microelectrode, as detailed under "Materials and Methods." Arrowheads indicate the time of ET-1 additions (final concentration, 1 nM). Double arrowhead denotes the time of administration of 10 µM bradykinin. Prior to the experiments cells were pretreated with BQ123 or BQ788 for 10 min. All tracings are representative of three separate experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (20K GIF file)]


Effects of Endothelin on the Rate of Endothelial Wound Healing

The rate of endothelial wound healing was examined by electroporation-induced RMVEC denudation from the surface of a gold miniature electrode, as previously detailed (25). ET-1 accelerated wound healing at 10 h by 66.0 ± 3.2% (n = 5) compared with the control medium (40.4 ± 2.0% (n = 5), p < 0.05) (Fig. 5). The rate of restitution of endothelial integrity was equally enhanced by IRL-1620 and by ET-3, and this effect was abolished by co-application of ETB receptor antagonist BQ788, further implicating ETB receptor in the observed phenomena (Fig. 5, A and B). The addition of L-NAME to ET-1- or ET-3-stimulated endothelial cells virtually abrogated this response (Fig. 5, C and D).


Fig. 5. Endothelial wound healing as monitored with an electrical impedance sensor. Microvascular endothelial cells were cultured to confluency on the surface of fibronectin-coated wells especially manufactured for measurements of resistance (24). At time 0, cells growing on the surface of a miniature electrode were destroyed by electroporation (25) (as detailed under "Materials and Methods"), and the rate of restitution of monolayer integrity, as judged by the restoration of the electrical impedance, was monitored for 20 h. Tracings are representative of 3-4 replicative experiments. In all these experiments, initial resistance of endothelial cells was within the range of 9,000-10,000 ohms/cm2. To simplify the comparison, ordinates represent normalized resistance. Note that ET-1, ET-3, and IRL-1620 were equipotent in accelerating endothelial wound healing and that a selective ETB receptor antagonist BQ788 reversed the effect of ET-1 (A, B, and D). Administration of 2 mM L-NAME to the culture medium inhibited wound healing despite the continuous presence of 1 nM ET-1 or ET-3 in the medium (C and D).
[View Larger Version of this Image (31K GIF file)]


Effects of Endothelin on Wound Healing in CHO Cells

To further test the above premise that NO production is required for ET-1-induced RMVEC migration, experiments were performed in a model system of CHO cells expressing ETBR and eNOS, as verified and detailed previously (9). ET-1 was ineffective in stimulating wound healing in CHO cells transfected with ETBR alone (Fig. 6). However, co-expression of both ETBR and eNOS in CHO cells imparted on them the migratory response to ET-1 and resulted in acceleration of wound healing. The data further confirm the permissive role of NO production in ET-1-induced migration.


Fig. 6. Effect of ET-1 on the rate of wound healing by genetically engineered CHO cells. Confluent cultures of wild type (WT) CHO cells as well as the cells stably expressing ETB receptor alone (CHO-ETBR) or together with eNOS (CHO-ETBR/NOS) were wounded as detailed under "Materials and Methods." The initial size of each wound was expressed as 100%, and the rate of wound healing was assessed as a decrease in wound size (panel A depicts representative images of wound healing). Note that ET-1 (1 nM) accelerated wound healing (* denotes p < 0.05 versus control, n = 5-7 separate experiments) only in CHO-ETBR/NOS cells, and this effect was inhibited by L-NAME (panel B). Wild type CHO cells did not respond to ET-1 (not shown).
[View Larger Version of this Image (83K GIF file)]


Effects of Endothelin in the Presence of Antisense Oligodeoxynucleotides Targeting eNOS

In the next series of experiments, a selective knockdown of eNOS was performed using antisense S-ODNs. To avoid any possible species-specific variations in the sequence, experiments were performed in HUVEC using an antisense construct directed against the initiation codon of human eNOS cDNA. Cells were treated with either antisense, sense, or scrambled S-ODNs, as detailed under "Materials and Methods." The expression of immunodetectable eNOS in endothelial cells subjected to S-ODNs is presented in Fig. 7, confirming the adequacy of treatments. Functional analysis of endothelial cells subjected to S-ODNs was accomplished by monitoring NO release. Fig. 8A depicts typical tracings of ET-1-induced NO release. Both sense and scrambled S-ODN-treated cells responded to ET-1 with increased NO release, similar to that observed in intact control cells. In contrast, antisense S-ODN-treated HUVEC failed to produce NO in response to ET-1. These data confirm the validity of the utilized S-ODN constructs. To study the effects of ET-1 on motility of S-ODN-treated HUVEC, experiments were performed in a modified Boyden apparatus. As summarized in Fig. 8B, pretreatment of HUVEC with antisense S-ODN resulted in a dramatic deceleration of transmigration, as compared with intact control cells and cells exposed to sense or scrambled constructs.


Fig. 7. Immunohistochemical detection of eNOS in HUVEC subjected to different phosphorothioate oligodeoxynucleotide constructs. Cells were pretreated with oligodeoxynucleotides (10 µM each) for 12 h prior to experiments. A, control cells, B-D, cells pretreated with the antisense, sense, or scrambled S-ODNs, respectively, E, control cells stained with the secondary antibody. Scale bar, 50 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (103K GIF file)]



Fig. 8. Effects of antisense oligodeoxynucleotides targeting the initiation codon of human eNOS cDNA on nitric oxide release (A) and transwell migration (B) of human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Phosphorothioated antisense (AS), sense (S), and scrambled (Scr) constructs were designed and prepared as detailed "Materials and Methods." Cells were pretreated with oligodeoxynucleotides (10 µM each) for 12 h prior to experiments. As shown in A, 1 nM Et-1 did not stimulate NO release from cells pretreated with antisense oligodeoxynucleotides, whereas control (C) cells or cells pretreated with sense and scrambled constructs responded to ET-1 with increased release of NO. (Inset to A shows the time and amplitude scale.) Tracings are representative of 3 separate experiments. In B, companion cells were utilized for ET-1-induced transwell migration experiments. Transmigration was halted only in cells pretreated with antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (* denotes p < 0.05 versus control).
[View Larger Version of this Image (39K GIF file)]



DISCUSSION

In this study, two different endothelial cell preparations, derived from rats and humans, showed a consistent acceleration of motility in response to members of the endothelin family. Through application of specific agonists and antagonists of known endothelin receptors, ETA and ETB, it was possible to implicate ETB receptor in the observed responses. However, these effects of ET were mediated by endogenous NO production, as confirmed by the results of three independent experimental approaches. In the first series of experiments, L-NAME prevented ET-1-induced endothelial cell transwell migration and wound healing. In the second series, CHO-ETBNOS cell, a model cell system devoid of complexity inherent to endothelial cells, showed NO dependence of migration induced by ET-1. Finally, the application of eNOS isoform-selective antisense S-ODNs, but not sense or scrambled constructs, to endothelial cells suppressed their migratory responsiveness to ET-1. From these observations, we derive a conclusion that stimulated NO production serves a permissive role in ET-induced acceleration of endothelial cell motility and wound healing.

ETB receptor in endothelial cells serves a unique purpose for autocrine feedback regulation of several physiologic functions by the produced ET-1. The application of anti-ET gamma -globulin to cultured endothelial cells inhibits the rate of proliferation (26, 27). Moreover, this receptor is implicated in ET-induced vasodilation (10). We have recently demonstrated that this non-isopeptide-selective receptor is functionally coupled to eNOS and coordinates the release of NO from endothelial cells (9). Stably transfected CHO-ETBNOS cells were successfully employed in those studies to reveal, in a simplified model system, that receptor-enzyme coupling involves the tyrosine kinase- and calcium/calmodulin-dependent pathways (9). Hence, the studies established a physiologically meaningful communication and coordination between endothelium-derived vasoconstrictor and vasodilator systems that control the vascular tone. Other investigators have also viewed ET-1 generated by endothelial cells as an autocrine motility factor (7, 8). However, results presented herein implicate for the first time the integral complex system of endothelium-derived vasoactive agonists, endothelin and NO, in endothelial cell motility and implicate this system in vascular remodeling.

We have previously demonstrated that NO production is a prerequisite for epithelial cell migration guided by several motogens, including hepatocyte growth factor and epidermal growth factor (11). The establishment of head-to-tail gradients of NO synthase in locomoting, but not in stationary, epithelial cells was construed as an important regulator of locomotion driven by these guidance cues (11). More recently, we have established that NO interferes with processes of endothelial cell adhesion to matrix proteins and participates in locomotion initiated by vascular endothelium growth factor.2 These findings provided an experimental basis for a hypothesis ascribing to NO the function of a modulator of cell-matrix adhesion. In this vein, ET-induced NO production by endothelial cells can be considered as a particular example of a more generalized phenomenon of NO-regulated cell motility.

The described NO production serving as a prerequisite for endothelial cell locomotion in response to activation of ETB receptor may explain a host of pathophysiologic observations on inadequate angiogenesis despite enhanced generation of ET-1. In hypercholesterolemic pigs and in humans with atherosclerotic lesions, ET-1 generation is augmented (28-30). The reason for the insufficient angiogenesis toward ischemic sites could be conceptually explained by the fact that NO production by the endothelium is suppressed under these conditions (31-33). Similarly, endothelial wound healing after balloon angioplasty is retarded, neointimal formation by proliferating smooth muscle cells is enhanced, and endothelin receptor antagonist SB 209670 protects angioplastic vessels against neointimal formation (14). Interpretation of these observations may rest on the above presented findings on the permissive role of NO in endothelial cell migration and wound healing.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants DK45695 and DK45462. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed: Dept. of Medicine, SUNY, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8152. Tel.: 516-444-1562; Fax: 516-444-6174; E-mail: mgoligorsky{at}epo.som.sunysb.edu.
1    The abbreviations used are: ET, endothelin; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; RMVEC, renal microvascular endothelial cells; HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cells; L-NAME, NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester; NO, nitric oxide; NOS, NO synthase; eNOS, endothelial NOS; ETBR, endothelin B receptor; S-ODN, the phosphorothioate derivatives of oligodeoxynucleotides.
2    E. Noiri, J. Testa, J. Quigley, D. Colfresh, C. Keese, I. Giaever, and M. S. Goligorsky, submitted for publication.

REFERENCES

  1. Shweiki, D., Itin, A., Soffer, D., and Keshet, E. (1992) Nature 359, 843-845 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Pu, L.-Q., Sniderman, A. D., Brassard, R., Lachapelle, K. J., Graham, A. M., Lisbona, R., and Symes, J. F. (1993) Circulation 88, 208-215 [Abstract]
  3. Harik, S. I., Hritz, M. A., and LaManna, J. C. (1995) J. Physiol. (London) 485, 525-530 [Abstract]
  4. Yanagisawa, M., Kurihara, H., Kimura, S., Tomobe, Y., Kobayashi, M., Mitsui, Y., Yazaki, Y., Goto, K., and Masaki, T. (1988) Nature 332, 411-415 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Rakugi, H., Tabuchi, Y., Nakamaru, M., Nagano, M., Higashimori, K., Mikami, H., Ogihara, T., and Suzuki, N. (1990) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 169, 973-977 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Kourembanas, S., Marsden, P. A., McQuillan, L. P., and Faller, D. V. (1991) J. Clin. Invest. 88, 1054-1057 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Wren, A., Hiley, C. R., and Fan, T-P. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 196, 369-375 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Morbidelli, L., Orlando, C., Maggi, C., Ledda, F., and Ziche, M. (1995) Am. J. Physiol. 269, H686-H695 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Tsukahara, H., Ende, H., Magazine, H. I., Bahou, W. F., and Goligorsky, M. S. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 21778-21785 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Takayanagi, R., Kitazumi, K., Takasaki, C., Ohnaka, K., Aimoto, S., Tasaka, K., Ohashi, M., and Nawata, H. (1991) FEBS Lett. 282, 103-106 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Noiri, E., Peresleni, T., Srivastava, N., Weber, P., Bahou, W. F., Peunova, N., and Goligorsky, M. S. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 270, C794-C802 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Ziche, M., Morbidelli, L., Masini, E., Amerini, S., Granger, H., Maggi, C., Geppetti, P., and Ledda, F. (1994) J. Clin. Invest. 94, 2036-2044 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Leibovich, S. J., Polverini, P. J., Fong, T. W., Harlow, L. A., and Koch, A. E. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 4190-4194 [Abstract]
  14. Douglas, S. A., Louden, C., Vickery-Clark, L. M., Storer, B. L., Hart, T., Feuerstein, G. Z., Elliott, J. D., and Ohlstein, E. H. (1994) Circ. Res. 75, 190-197 [Abstract]
  15. Tsukahara, H., Gordienko, D. V., Tonshoff, B., Gelato, M. C., and Goligorsky, M. S. (1994) Kidney Int. 45, 598-604 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Jaffe, E. A., Nachman, R. L., Becker, C. G., and Minick, C. R. (1973) J. Clin. Invest. 52, 2745-2756 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Kaufman, R. J., and Sharp, P. A. (1982) J. Mol. Biol. 159, 601-621 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Urlaub, G., and Chasin, L. A. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 77, 4216-4220 [Abstract]
  19. Chen, C., and Okayama, H. (1987) Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 2745-2752 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Janssens, S. P., Shimouchi, A., Quertermous, T., Bloch, D. B., and Bloch, K. D. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 14519-14522 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., and Lipman, D. J. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Shimonaka, M., and Yamaguchi, Y. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 14284-14289 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Ichimori, K., Ishida, H., Fukabori, M., Nakazawa, H., and Murakami, E. (1994) Rev. Sci. Instrum. 65, 1-5 [CrossRef]
  24. Giaever, I., and Keese, C. R. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 7896-7900 [Abstract]
  25. Ghosh, P., Keese, C. R., and Giaever, I. (1993) Biophys. J. 64, 1602-1609 [Abstract]
  26. Takagi, Y., Fukase, M., Takata, S., Yoshimi, H., Tokunaga, O., and Fujita, T. (1990) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 168, 537-543 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Fujitani, Y., Oda, K., Takimoto, M., Inui, T., Okada, T., and Urade, Y. (1992) FEBS Lett. 298, 79-83 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Lerman, A., Webster, M. W. I., Chesebro, J. H., Edwards, W. D., Wei, C.-M., Fuster, V., and Burnett, J. C., Jr. (1993) Circulation 88, 2923-2928 [Abstract]
  29. Lerman, A., Edwards, B. S., Hallett, J. W., Heublein, D. H., Sandberg, S. M., and Burnett, J. C., Jr. (1991) N. Engl. J. Med. 325, 997-1001 [Abstract]
  30. Winkles, J. A., Alberts, G. F., Brogi, E., and Libby, P. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 191, 1081-1088 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Chester, A. H., O'Neil, G. S., and Moncada, S. (1990) Lancet 336, 897-900 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Bossaller, C., Habib, G. B., and Yamamoto, H. (1987) J. Clin. Invest. 79, 170-174 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Shimokawa, H., and Vanhoutte, P. M. (1989) Circ. Res. 64, 900-914 [Abstract]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.