Dexamethasone Induces Posttranslational Degradation of GLUT2 and Inhibition of Insulin Secretion in Isolated Pancreatic beta  Cells
COMPARISON WITH THE EFFECTS OF FATTY ACIDS*

(Received for publication, August 15, 1996, and in revised form, October 30, 1996)

Sandrine Gremlich , Raphaël Roduit and Bernard Thorens Dagger

From the Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Lausanne, 27 Rue du Bugnon, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

GLUT2 expression is strongly decreased in glucose-unresponsive pancreatic beta  cells of diabetic rodents. This decreased expression is due to circulating factors distinct from insulin or glucose. Here we evaluated the effect of palmitic acid and the synthetic glucocorticoid dexamethasone on GLUT2 expression by in vitro cultured rat pancreatic islets. Palmitic acid induced a 40% decrease in GLUT2 mRNA levels with, however, no consistent effect on protein expression. Dexamethasone, in contrast, had no effect on GLUT2 mRNA, but decreased GLUT2 protein by about 65%. The effect of dexamethasone was more pronounced at high glucose concentrations and was inhibited by the glucocorticoid antagonist RU-486. Biosynthetic labeling experiments revealed that GLUT2 translation rate was only minimally affected by dexamethasone, but that its half-life was decreased by 50%, indicating that glucocorticoids activated a posttranslational degradation mechanism. This degradation mechanism was not affecting all membrane proteins, since the alpha  subunit of the Na+/K+-ATPase was unaffected. Glucose-induced insulin secretion was strongly decreased by treatment with palmitic acid and/or dexamethasone. The insulin content was decreased (~55 percent) in the presence of palmitic acid, but increased (~180%) in the presence of dexamethasone. We conclude that a combination of elevated fatty acids and glucocorticoids can induce two common features observed in diabetic beta  cells, decreased GLUT2 expression, and loss of glucose-induced insulin secretion.


INTRODUCTION

Development of non-insulin-dependent, type II diabetes mellitus is accompanied by a loss of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS)1 (1, 2). The primary causes of this secretory defect are not yet completely elucidated. However, in rodent models of diabetes, the loss of GSIS has been demonstrated to correlate with a reduced or suppressed expression of the beta  cell glucose transporter GLUT2 (3-6). Thus, in addition to a loss of GSIS, a decreased expression of GLUT2 is also a characteristic of diabetic beta  cells. In an attempt at identifying the causes of GLUT2-regulated expression, we previously performed islet cross-transplantation experiments. When control islets were transplanted in diabetic mice, GLUT2 expression was suppressed whereas when GLUT2 nonexpressing islets from diabetic animals were transplanted into control mice, a complete recovery of transporter expression was observed. These experiments led to the conclusion that circulating factors present in the diabetic environment, distinct from glucose and insulin, were responsible for the loss of GLUT2 expression (6). Furthermore, the down-expression of GLUT2 in transplanted islets correlated with a loss of GSIS (7). Identification of the circulating factors that control GLUT2 expression in beta  cells is therefore of critical importance, as they may be responsible for the functional alterations of beta cells in diabetes.

Elevated circulating free fatty acids and triglycerides are part of the symptoms of both insulin-dependent and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (8, 9). Free fatty acids have been described for many years as being able to induce a state of insulin resistance in peripheral tissues by a glucose/fatty acid cycle that prevents a normal uptake of glucose (10). The effects of free fatty acids on the function of pancreatic islets has been studied both in in vivo and in vitro experiments. These studies indicated that short term (1-3 h) exposure of pancreatic islets to free fatty acids had a stimulatory effect on GSIS (11-13), whereas longer exposure led to a suppression of insulin secretion (12-14). This inhibitory effect is also accompanied by a decrease in insulin biosynthesis, in glucose oxidation, and a reduction in pyruvate dehydrogenase activity with a parallel increase in pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase activity (15, 16). A major role for free fatty acids in the development of beta  cell glucose unresponsiveness has thus been proposed. This was further supported by the observation that circulating free fatty acid levels were increased a few weeks before development of hyperglycemia and loss of GLUT2 expression in male Zucker diabetic rats, while obese female Zucker rats, which do not develop hyperglycemia and do not lose GLUT2, did not show this increase in free fatty acids, even though they develop similar hypertriglyceridemia (17). Furthermore, incubation of pancreatic islets in the presence of free fatty acids induced an increase in low Km glucose usage (18) and an elevated basal insulin secretion rate (14, 18). However, no apparent regulation of GLUT2 expression by free fatty acids has been observed in islets maintained in tissue culture (9). Thus, although free fatty acids may lead to a number of beta  cells dysfunctions associated with diabetes, they apparently do not induce the decreased or suppressed expression of GLUT2. This therefore indicates that additional factors also participate in the induction of the beta cells functional alterations in diabetes.

Dexamethasone administration in humans and in animals as well as hypercortisolism in Cushing syndrome are known to induce a state of insulin resistance. This is also usually accompanied by changes in beta  cell functions, in particular an increase in basal but a decrease in stimulated insulin secretion, an increase in proinsulin mRNA, a decrease in islet insulin stores, and an hyperplasia and hypertrophy of the beta  cells (19-23). Dexamethasone administration to rats does not, however, induce a decrease in beta  cell GLUT2 (24). Only if diabetes is induced, as for example following repeated injections of high doses of dexamethasone to Wistar rats or of relatively lower doses to Zucker fa/fa rats, is a decrease in GLUT2 expression observed (22, 25). The exact role of dexamethasone on pancreatic beta  cells is, however, difficult to evaluate when administered to the intact animal. In vitro, exposure of RINm5F cells to dexamethasone increased proinsulin mRNA levels but did not alter the insulin secretion rate at any glucose concentrations (26). In HIT cells and isolated beta  cells dexamethasone induces a decrease in insulin secretion and mRNA (27). The inhibitory effect on mRNA levels can, however, be completely prevented by increases in intracellular cAMP (28).

Here we studied the effect of palmitic acid and dexamethasone alone, or in combination on the expression of GLUT2, on GSIS and on insulin mRNA levels in in vitro cultured rat pancreatic islets. We demonstrate that a combination of both substances can reproduce in vitro the decrease in GSIS and GLUT2 expression observed in islets from diabetic rodents.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were purchased from Biological Research Laboratories Ltd., Ficoll DL-400 and palmitic acid (sodium salt) from Fluka, collagenase (type IV) from Worthington, and bovine serum albumin (BSA fraction V, essentially fatty acid-free) from Sigma. GeneScreen nylon membranes for RNA analysis were from DuPont NEN and random primed labeling kit for cDNA probe labeling from Life Technologies, Inc. Protran nitrocellulose membranes for protein analysis were from Schleicher & Schuell and bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay from Pierce. The enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit for Western blot (ECL) and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin antibody were from Amersham Corp. Non-esterified fatty acid enzymatic detection kit (NEFA PAP) used for fatty acid concentrations determination was from Biomerieux and antibodies for the insulin radioimmunoassay from Linco Research Inc.

Islet Isolation

Pancreatic islets were isolated from male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing about 200 g. Islets were isolated following digestion of total pancreas with collagenase and subsequent separation of the total digested pancreas on a discontinuous Ficoll gradient, according to the method of Gotoh et al. (29).

Islet Culture

Islets were kept in culture at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. On day 0 (just after the isolation), islets were resuspended at 15-20 islets/ml in RPMI 1640 medium (11 mM glucose), supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 10 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and 50 µM beta -mercaptoethanol. On day 1, medium was changed to RPMI 1640 containing 2.8 mM glucose, and on day 2 islets were placed in RPMI containing either 2.8, 5.6, or 30 mM glucose, in the presence of different concentrations of palmitic acid or dexamethasone, for the indicated periods of time.

Palmitic acid was prepared as a 8 mM solution in Hepes-buffered Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer, pH 7.4 (KRBH) containing 10% bovine serum albumin (essentially fatty acid-free) (final fatty acid/BSA molar ratio: 5.7); fatty acid was equilibrated with BSA overnight at 37 °C and filtered before use. In control conditions, KRBH, 10% BSA was added to a final concentration of 5%. Free fatty acid concentrations in the medium were checked with a non-esterified fatty acid enzymatic detection kit (NEFA PAP).

Dexamethasone and RU-486 stock solutions were prepared in absolute ethanol and added to the medium at final ethanol concentration comprised between 0.1 and 1%.

RNA Extraction and Northern Blot Analysis

Total RNA was prepared from 40 islets, in the presence of 20 µg of yeast tRNA as carrier, according to the acid guanidinium thiocyanate/phenol-chloroform extraction method (30). After separation by electrophoresis on 1.2% agarose gels containing 2% formaldehyde and transfer to nylon membranes either overnight by capillary action, or for 2 h using a vacuum blotter, specific mRNAs were detected following prehybridization of the filters for 4 h at 42 °C in 50% formamide, 5 × SSC (SSC: 150 mM NaCl, 17 mM sodium citrate, pH 7.0), 0.1 M Na2HPO4/NaH2PO4, pH 6.5, 10 mM EDTA, 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 5 × Denhardt's (Denhardt's: 0.02% Ficoll 400, 0.02% polyvinylpyrrolidone, 0.02% bovine serum albumin), and 0.1 mg/ml yeast tRNA and hybridization overnight in the same buffer with 106 cpm/ml of a 32P-radiolabeled probe. cDNAs fragments used as probes were a 1.4-kilobase pair EcoRI fragment from plasmid pLGT-1 for GLUT2 (31), a 0.5-kilobase pair EcoRI fragment from pMSVTKpUChPPI-1 (gift from K. Docherty, University of Aberdeen) for insulin mRNA, and a 0.8-kilobase pair BamHI-HindIII fragment from gamma -actin-pGEM for actin mRNA (32). Filters were exposed at -80 °C with an intensifying screen for 2 to 4 days to Kodak X-AR films.

Western Blot Analysis

Islets were lysed in a buffer containing 80 mM Tris, pH 6.8, 5 mM EDTA, 5% SDS, 2 mM N-ethylmaleimide, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and sonicated 1.5 min in the cup of a sonicator (33). Proteins were quantitated by the BCA assay, using bovine serum albumin as a standard, and 5 µg (except otherwise specified) were analyzed on SDS-containing 10% polyacrylamide gels. The proteins were then transferred to nitrocellulose filters and the transporter detected with a rabbit antibody raised against a peptide corresponding to amino acids 513-522 of rat GLUT2 (31) (dilution 1:2,000) and a horseradish peroxidase-coupled donkey anti-rabbit immunoglobulin antibody (dilution 1:8,000). Detection was with the enhanced chemiluminescence detection technique. For the alpha  subunit of the Na+/K+-ATPase, an antibody raised against the purified alpha  subunit of the Bufo marinus Na+/K+-ATPase was used (34).

Biosynthetic Labeling

For pulse-chase experiments, islets were first treated for 48 h with or without 1 µM dexamethasone. After washing twice with PBS, they were incubated 30 min in RPMI 1640 medium depleted of methionine and complemented with 10% dialyzed fetal calf serum and labeled with 80 µCi/ml [35S]methionine for 5 min at 37 °C. Cells were then washed twice with PBS and lysed in PBS containing 1% Triton X-100 and 5 mM EDTA for 10 min at 4 °C. Nuclei and cells debris were pelleted by a 15-min centrifugation at 13,000 rpm in a tabletop centrifuge, and the supernatant was recovered. Incorporated radioactivity was quantitated by trichloroacetic acid precipitation, and samples containing equivalent amounts of radioactivity were immunoprecipitated overnight at 4 °C with 3 µl of each of two anti-GLUT2 antibodies, raised against peptides corresponding to amino acids 513-522 and 47-60 of the rat GLUT2, as described (33). Immunoprecipitates were collected with 30 µl of protein A-Sepharose beads for 20 min at room temperature. After washings, they were resuspended in sample buffer and analyzed on SDS-containing 7.5% polyacrylamide gel, exactly as described (33). Gels were then treated 15 min in glacial acetic acid, 30 min in diphenyloxazol 10% in acetic acid, and washed 30 min in H2O before being dried and exposed to x-ray films at -70 °C.

For determination of GLUT2 half-life, islets were first treated with or without 1 µM dexamethasone for 24 h. Islets in groups of ~200 were then pulse-labeled as described above except that the pulse was for 3 h in the presence of 200 µCi/ml [35S]methionine. Islets were then washed and either lysed directly or returned to the normal culture medium containing 2 mM cold methionine and chased at 37 °C for 6, 12, or 24 h with or without dexamethasone. Islets were lysed in 100 µl of a buffer consisting of 1% SDS in PBS and protease inhibitors. After further dilution of the lysate in 400 µl of PBS containing 1.25% Triton X-100, GLUT2 was immunoprecipitated from identical amounts of total cellular proteins and analyzed by gel electrophoresis as described above. Quantitation of band intensity was by laser scanning densitometry.

Islets Perifusion

After incubation of the islets for 48 h in the presence of 0.6 mM palmitic acid and/or 1 µM dexamethasone as mentioned above, batches of 10 islets were prepared and placed in a perifusion chamber. The perifusion buffer was a Krebs-Ringer solution containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin, and the flow rate was adjusted at 1 ml·min-1. Perifusion experiments consisted in a 40-min equilibration period in the presence of 2.8 mM glucose before switching the glucose concentration to 16.7 mM. Fractions were collected every minute. Insulin was then quantitated by radioimmunoassay, using rat insulin as a standard.

Quantitative Analysis

Results are presented as mean ± S.E.. Statistical differences were analyzed by the Student's t test.


RESULTS

Effects of Palmitic Acid on GLUT2 Expression

Pancreatic islets were kept in tissue culture for 48 h in the presence of 2.8 mM glucose or 30 mM glucose and increasing concentrations of palmitic acid. Total RNA was isolated from batches of 40 islets, and GLUT2 and actin mRNA levels were evaluated by Northern blot analysis. Quantitation of GLUT2 was always expressed as the ratio of GLUT2 to actin mRNA. Fig. 1A shows that increasing the glucose concentration from 2.8 to 30 mM led to an increase in GLUT2 mRNA, as expected (35, 36), and that addition of 0.6 mM palmitic acid induced a decrease in GLUT2 mRNA. Fig. 1B shows a quantitation of the time-dependent modulation of the GLUT2 to actin ratio over a 6-day period. Maximal reduction was already reached after 1 day. Fig. 1C shows the dose-dependent effect with a maximal reduction observed in the presence of 0.6 mM palmitic acid. Decreases in GLUT2 mRNA were, however, not correlated with any consistent reduction in GLUT2 protein expression either in dose response or in time course experiments (not shown).


Fig. 1. Palmitic acid regulation of GLUT2 mRNA in isolated pancreatic islets. A, Northern blot analysis of GLUT2 and actin mRNAs in pancreatic islets incubated for 24 and 48 h in the presence of 2.8 mM glucose or 30 mM glucose in the presence or absence of 0.6 mM palmitic acid. B, quantitation of the GLUT2 to actin mRNA ratio in pancreatic islets incubated in the presence of 0.6 mM palmitic acid for different periods of time (for each point, n >=  4). C, quantitation of the GLUT2 to actin mRNA ratio in pancreatic islets incubated in the presence of different concentrations of palmitic acid for 48 h (for each point, n >=  4).
[View Larger Version of this Image (21K GIF file)]


Dexamethasone Effect on GLUT2 mRNA and Protein

Exposure of isolated islets to dexamethasone concentrations ranging from 1 nM to 1 µM for 48 h did not significantly alter GLUT2 mRNA levels (Fig. 2, A and B) except for an apparently significant increase at 10 nM (142.6 ± 16.2%, mean ± S.E. of control value (n = 4), p < 0.05). At the protein level, however, dexamethasone induced a strong decrease in GLUT2 expression (Fig. 3, A and B). A significant effect was already observed at 10 nM, and the maximal inhibitory effect was reached at 1 µM dexamethasone (34.9 ± 10.7% of the control value (n = 5)). Time course experiments showed that this maximal effect was already observed after 24 h (Fig. 4, A and B).


Fig. 2. Effect of dexamethasone on GLUT2 mRNA levels in isolated pancreatic islets. A, Northern blot analysis of GLUT2 and actin mRNAs; B, quantitation of the GLUT2 to actin mRNA ratio. Results are expressed as mean ± S.E. for n = 4. No change in mRNA levels can be detected except at 10 nM, where the increase in mRNA is 142.6 ± 16.2% of control.
[View Larger Version of this Image (31K GIF file)]



Fig. 3. Effect of dexamethasone on GLUT2 protein expression. Isolated pancreatic islets were kept in culture for 48 h in the presence of different concentrations of dexamethasone. After cell lysis, equal amount of proteins were separated by gel electrophoresis and analyzed by Western blotting. A, Western blot of GLUT2; B, quantitation of GLUT2 expression relative to control at 30 mM glucose. Results are expressed as mean ± S.E. for n = 5.
[View Larger Version of this Image (23K GIF file)]



Fig. 4. Time course of dexamethasone effect on GLUT2 protein expression. Isolated pancreatic islets were maintained in the presence (+) or absence (-) of 1 µM dexamethasone for the indicated periods of time, and GLUT2 expression was analyzed as described in the legend to Fig. 3. A, Western blot; B, quantitation of GLUT2 expression relative to control at 30 mM glucose. Results are expressed as mean ± S.E. for n = 4. The maximal decrease in GLUT2 expression is reached at 24 h.
[View Larger Version of this Image (23K GIF file)]


Dexamethasone is thought to exert its cellular effects by binding to and activating glucocorticoid receptors. Activation of these receptors can be inhibited by the antagonist RU-486. We thus assessed whether the effect of 0.1 µM dexamethasone could be blocked by increasing concentrations of RU-486. Fig. 5 shows that the decreased expression of GLUT2 could indeed be completely prevented by RU-486.


Fig. 5. Dexamethasone-induced decrease in GLUT2 expression is prevented by the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist RU-486. Isolated pancreatic islets were maintained in the presence (+) or absence (-) of 0.1 µM dexamethasone for 48 h and in the presence of the indicated concentrations of RU-486. GLUT2 was then analyzed by Western blot analysis. The inhibitory effect of dexamethasone could be completely reversed by 1 µM of RU-486.
[View Larger Version of this Image (52K GIF file)]


To determine whether the effect of dexamethasone was dependent on the presence of high glucose concentrations in the medium, we incubated islets in the presence of 1 µM dexamethasone and different glucose concentrations and measured GLUT2 expression by Western blot analysis. At 2.8 mM glucose dexamethasone had no effect on GLUT2 protein expression (109.9 ± 21.5% of control value (n = 7)), but at higher glucose concentrations, dexamethasone induced a decrease in GLUT2 protein: 67.7 ± 9.2% of control at 5.6 mM glucose (n = 6) and 42.6 ± 9.2% of control at 30 mM glucose (n = 7) (Fig. 6).


Fig. 6. The effect of dexamethasone is glucose-dependent. Pancreatic islets were kept in culture for 48 h with the indicated concentrations of glucose and in the presence (+) or absence (-) of dexamethasone. The reduction in GLUT2 expression relative to incubation in the absence of dexamethasone was much more pronounced in the presence of high glucose concentrations. Results are expressed as mean ± S.E. for n >=  6.
[View Larger Version of this Image (52K GIF file)]


Since dexamethasone decreased GLUT2 protein expression without modifying mRNA levels, we next determined whether the observed effect was at the translational or posttranslational level by performing biosynthetic labeling experiments. Islets previously treated for 48 h with 1 µM dexamethasone were pulse-labeled for 5 min with [35S]methionine, lysed, and GLUT2 was immunoprecipitated and analyzed by gel electrophoresis. In parallel, an aliquot of the biosynthetically labeled islets was directly lysed in the electrophoresis sample buffer for quantitative analysis of GLUT2 by Western blot analysis. These experiments showed that GLUT2 synthesis rate was only slightly decreased (81.2 ± 5.9% of control (n = 3)), while at the same time total GLUT2 levels were decreased to 35.2 ± 5.7% of control (n = 2) (Fig. 7, A and B). This indicated that dexamethasone had little effect on GLUT2 translational rate. To assess whether the half-life of GLUT2 was decreased, batches of 200 islets were first treated with or without 1 µM dexamethasone for 24 h and then pulse-labeled for 3 h with [35S]methionine. At the end of the pulse the islets were washed and either lysed or returned to a normal culture medium containing an excess of cold methionine and incubated at 37 °C for 6, 12, or 24 h with or without dexamethasone. After immunoprecipitation and separation by gel electrophoresis, GLUT2 was quantitated by laser scanning densitometry. Fig. 7C shows that the half-life of GLUT2 was decreased from 20 to 10 h in the presence of dexamethasone, indicating a major effect of glucocorticoids on transporter stability.


Fig. 7. Regulation of GLUT2 decreased expression by dexamethasone is at the posttranslational level. A and B, pancreatic islets were kept in culture for 48 h in the presence (+) or absence (-) of dexamethasone. They were then pulse-labeled for 5 min with [35S]methionine. Following cell lysis, a part of the lysate was used for immunoprecipitation of GLUT2, and the other part was used for Western blot detection of GLUT2. A, gel electrophoretic analysis of pulse-labeled and immunoprecipitated GLUT2 (pulse labeling) and of total cellular GLUT2 by Western blot. B, quantitation of pulse-labeled (top) and total GLUT2 (bottom) in the presence (treated) and absence (control) of 1 µM dexamethasone. C, pancreatic islets were treated with or without 1 µM dexamethasone for 24 h, pulse-labeled for 3 h with [35S]methionine, and GLUT2 was immunoprecipitated after 0, 6, 12, or 24 h of chase in a medium containing an excess of cold methionine. After immunoprecipitation and separation by gel electrophoresis, the intensities of the GLUT2 bands were determined by scanning densitometry. The results are expressed as percent of GLUT2 detected at the end of the pulse. The half-life of GLUT2 is decreased from 20 to 10 h in the presence of glucocorticoid treatment. Results are expressed as mean ± S.E. for n >=  2.
[View Larger Version of this Image (19K GIF file)]


Finally, to determine whether the dexamethasone effect was specific for GLUT2, we evaluated the expression of the alpha  subunit of the Na+/K+-ATPase. Fig. 8 shows that at the maximal dexamethasone concentration tested, expression of this protein was not decreased but rather increased by dexamethasone treatment, suggesting that the effect of dexamethasone was not due to a general effect on membrane proteins.


Fig. 8. Dexamethasone effect on GLUT2 is specific. Pancreatic islets were maintained in culture in the presence (+) or absence (-) of dexamethasone for 48 h. Total GLUT2 and alpha subunit of the Na+/K+ ATPase were assessed by Western blot analysis of 50 µg of total proteins. Whereas GLUT2 expression is strongly decreased, that of the alpha  subunit of the Na+/K+-ATPase is rather increased.
[View Larger Version of this Image (27K GIF file)]


Combined Effect of Palmitic Acid and Dexamethasone on GLUT2 mRNA and Protein

The combined effect of dexamethasone and palmitic acid was tested in 48-h incubations of islets with 0.6 mM palmitate plus increasing dexamethasone concentrations. At the mRNA level, the presence of dexamethasone at 0.1 µM increased the inhibitory effect of palmitic acid, leading to a decrease in GLUT2 mRNA levels from 65.6 ± 2.8% of control levels (n = 5), in the presence of palmitic acid alone, to 41.5 ± 8.1% of control levels (n = 5), in the presence of palmitic acid and dexamethasone (p < 0.01) (Fig. 9, A and B). Combination of palmitic acid and dexamethasone led to a decrease in GLUT2 protein down to 24.6 ± 5.3% of the control at 1 µM dexamethasone (n = 4), which was not significantly different from the effect of dexamethasone alone (see Fig. 3).


Fig. 9. Dexamethasone increases the inhibitory effect of palmitic acid on GLUT2 mRNA levels. Pancreatic islets were maintained in culture in the presence (+) or absence (-) of 0.6 mM palmitic acid and the indicated concentrations of dexamethasone for 48 h. GLUT2 and actin mRNA levels were then evaluated by Northern blot analysis. A, Northern blot; B, quantitation of the GLUT2 to actin mRNAs ratio (n >=  4). Dexamethasone significantly (p < 0.01) increased the inhibitory effect of palmitic acid on GLUT2 mRNA levels.
[View Larger Version of this Image (28K GIF file)]


Insulin Secretion, Islet Insulin Content, and Insulin mRNA

The effect of dexamethasone and/or palmitic acid on insulin secretion was assessed in islet perifusion experiments. Islets treated for 48 h with 0.6 mM palmitic acid and/or 1 µM dexamethasone showed no change in basal insulin secretion compared with control islets. However, a 73.1 ± 10.0% (n = 2) inhibition of the glucose-induced insulin secretion was observed following dexamethasone treatment, a 72.1 ± 7.7% (n = 2) decrease following palmitic acid treatment, and an 81.8 ± 2.8% (n = 2) decrease when both treatments were combined (Fig. 10, A-C).


Fig. 10. Palmitic acid and dexamethasone alone or in combination suppress glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Pancreatic islets were maintained in culture in the presence or absence of palmitic acid (0.6 mM), dexamethasone (1 µM), or a combination of both for 48 h. 10 islets were then picked for analysis of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in a perifusion chamber. Perifusion were performed in parallel for control and treated islets. A, palmitic acid-treated islets; B, dexamethasone-treated islets; C, palmitic acid and dexamethasone-treated islets.
[View Larger Version of this Image (18K GIF file)]


The insulin content of islets treated for 48 h with 0.6 mM palmitic acid and/or 1 µM dexamethasone was then measured. Palmitic acid, with or without dexamethasone, induced a decrease in insulin content which reached 46.7 ± 2.8% for palmitic acid alone (n = 2) and 43.3 ± 13.7% for palmitic acid plus dexamethasone (n = 2), compared with control values. On the opposite, dexamethasone treatment increased insulin content to 177.2 ± 17.0% (n = 4) of the control islets.

Islet insulin mRNA levels following palmitic acid and/or dexamethasone treatment were measured by Northern blot analysis. Dexamethasone, present at concentrations from 1 nM to 1 µM, did not induce any change in insulin mRNA, except possibly at 1 µM, where a small increase was observed: 118.4 ± 5.0% of the control (n = 3) (p < 0.05 versus control). On the opposite, islets exposed to palmitic acid exhibited a decrease in insulin mRNA down to 66.4 ± 12.9% of control at 0.6 mM palmitic acid (n = 6). Addition of different concentrations of dexamethasone did not alter palmitic acid effect.


DISCUSSION

In the present study, we demonstrated that free fatty acids and the synthetic glucocorticoid dexamethasone down-regulate GLUT2 expression in isolated pancreatic islets. Whereas palmitic acid induced a decrease in GLUT2 mRNA levels, it did not induce consistent changes in GLUT2 protein expression. In contrast, dexamethasone induced a strong decrease in GLUT2 protein levels but no change in mRNA levels. Both substances, however, displayed a very strong inhibitory action on glucose-induced insulin secretion.

Free fatty acids are elevated in both type I and type II diabetes and have been shown to have a number of negative effects on insulin sensitivity of peripheral tissues and function of pancreatic beta  cells. The present experiments were undertaken to determine whether palmitic acid could have a role in the control of GLUT2 expression in addition to its inhibitory effect on GSIS. The effect of palmitic acid was detectable only on the regulation of transporter mRNA levels, and no consistent changes could be observed at the protein level. This indicates that although free fatty acids are able to induce glucose unresponsiveness in beta  cells, in agreement with previously published work (12-14), they are certainly not the only factor inducing the dysfunction of these cells in diabetes, since GLUT2 levels are unaffected.

Dexamethasone effect on islet function as observed in the present experiment is at least 2-fold: a strong reduction in GLUT2 protein expression and a severe inhibition of GSIS. The decrease in GLUT2 protein expression is relatively rapid, occurring within 24 h of exposure to dexamethasone. Strikingly, there is no parallel decrease in mRNA levels. This, therefore, indicates that the regulation of transporter expression is at the translational or posttranslational level. Our pulse-labeling experiments demonstrated only a minimal decrease in the rate of transporter translation, suggesting that the regulation was at a posttranslational level. This was indeed directly demonstrated in pulse-chase experiments, which showed a 50% decrease in GLUT2 half-life, induced by glucocorticoid treatment. Since the effect of dexamethasone could be inhibited by the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist RU-486, transcriptional activation of a gene or a set of genes is required to increase the rate of GLUT2 degradation. Although we do not know which gene products are responsible for stimulating transporter degradation, possible candidates include components of the ubiquitin-proteasome degradation system. Indeed, in muscle, dexamethasone has been shown to activate the energy-dependent protein degradative system and the expression of ubiquitin (37). Although in this report degradation of myofibrillar proteins was assessed, it is known that membrane proteins such as CFTR can also be degraded by the proteasome-ubiquitin system (38, 39). Whatever degradative system is induced, it must display a selectivity for the transporter, since another membrane protein, the alpha  subunit of the Na+/K+-ATPase, was not decreased in the presence of dexamethasone. Another interesting observation is that degradation of GLUT2 induced by dexamethasone was more pronounced in the presence of high glucose concentrations. The effect of dexamethasone cannot simply be explained as an inhibition of the glucose effect, since it has been demonstrated that the increase in GLUT2 expression induced by glucose is due to transcriptional activation of its gene (35, 36), whereas the effect of dexamethasone on GLUT2 is at the posttranslational level. Activation of the degradative system is thus both glucose- and dexamethasone-dependent.

When added to islets in the presence of palmitic acid, dexamethasone increased the inhibitory action of fatty acids on GLUT2 mRNA. It might then be postulated that the effect of fatty acids is increased by dexamethasone by a mechanism involving interaction at the GLUT2 promoter of glucocorticoid receptors and fatty acid-activated transcription factors such as the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors or stimulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors expression by dexamethasone (40).

Insulin Secretion, Islets Insulin Content, and Insulin mRNA

Dexamethasone and fatty acids, alone or in combination, had a negative impact on the first and second phases of glucose-induced insulin secretion. This has been demonstrated previously for fatty acids (13, 14, 18). Here, however, we did not observe the increase in basal secretory activity reported in these preceding studies. We, however, observed a decrease in proinsulin mRNA levels and in total insulin content. The inhibitory effect of dexamethasone correlated with an increase in total insulin content and in the absence of a reduction in proinsulin mRNA. The mechanism by which fatty acids and dexamethasone exert their inhibitory effect on GSIS is not known. For fatty acids, a decrease in pyruvate dehydrogenase and increase in pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase has been reported which could result in impaired glucose signaling (15). For dexamethasone, an increase in glucose-6-phosphatase, which increases glucose cycling in beta  cells, may reduce the glucose signaling pathway (41, 42). Dexamethasone has also been demonstrated to increase islets neuropeptide Y content and secretion (43). This peptide, by binding to specific Gi-coupled receptors present on beta  cells, has been shown to have an inhibitory action on insulin secretion (44). In addition, the activation of a proteolytic activity, as demonstrated in the present study, may also lead to the degradation of essential components of the insulin granules exocytic machinery.

Together, our data show that in addition to fatty acids, dexamethasone has profound effects on the function of isolated pancreatic beta  cells. The observed decreased expression of GLUT2 is due to the induction of a protein degradative system, which is better induced in hyperglycemic conditions and which shows apparent specificity for the transporter when compared with the alpha  subunit of the Na+/K+-ATPase. The strong inhibitory action on insulin secretion may be due to a combination of different causes, including alterations in glucose metabolism, increased secretion of neuropeptide Y, or degradation of key components of the exocytic machinery. High glucocorticoid levels in the presence of hyperglycemia may therefore have inhibitory effects on beta  cells functions that are different from those reported in dexamethasone-induced insulin resistance when normoglycemia is prevailing. These effects may explain the decrease in GLUT2 expression observed for instance in db/db mice (6) which have high circulating levels of glucocorticoids (45).


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by Grants 31-30313.90 from the Swiss National Science Foundation and 195107 from Juvenile Diabetes Foundation International. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    Recipient of a Career Development Award from the Swiss National Science Foundation. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Inst. of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Lausanne, 27, rue du Bugnon, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland. Tel.: 41-21-692-53-90; Fax: 41-21-692-53-55; E-mail: bernard.thorens{at}ipharm.unil.ch.
1    The abbreviations used are: GSIS, glucose-stimulated insulin secretion; BSA, bovine serum albumin; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.

REFERENCES

  1. Cerasi, E., Luft, R., and Efendic, S. (1971) Diabetes 21, 224-234 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Robertson, R. P., and Porte, D., Jr (1973) J. Clin. Invest. 52, 870-876
  3. Unger, R. H. (1991) Science 251, 1200-1205 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Johnson, J. H., Ogawa, A., Chen, L., Orci, L., Newgard, C. B., Alam, T., and Unger, R. H. (1990) Science 250, 546-549 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Thorens, B., Weir, G. C., Leahy, J. L., Lodish, H. F., and Bonner-Weir, S. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 6492-6406 [Abstract]
  6. Thorens, B., Wu, Y.-J., Leahy, J. L., and Weir, G. C. (1992) J. Clin. Invest. 90, 77-85 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Ogawa, Y., Noma, Y., Davalli, A. M., Wu, Y.-J., Thorens, B., Bonner-Weir, S., and Weir, G. C. (1995) Diabetes 44, 75-79 [Abstract]
  8. McGarry, J. D. (1992) Science 258, 766-770 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Unger, R. H. (1996) Diabetes 44, 863-870 [Abstract]
  10. Randle, P. J., Kerbey, A. L., and Espinal, J. (1988) Diabetes Metab. Rev. 4, 623-638 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Crespin, S. R., Greenough, W. B., III, and Steinberg, D. (1973) J. Clin. Invest. 52, 1979-1984 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Sako, Y., and Grill, V. E. (1990) Endocrinology 127, 1580-1589 [Abstract]
  13. Elks, M. L. (1993) Endocrinology 133, 208-214 [Abstract]
  14. Zhou, Y.-P., and Grill, V. E. (1994) J. Clin. Invest. 93, 870-876 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Zhou, Y.-P., and Grill, V. E. (1995) Diabetes 44, 394-399 [Abstract]
  16. Zhou, Y.-P., and Grill, V. E. (1995) J. Clin. Endocrinol. & Metab. 80, 1584-1590 [Abstract]
  17. Lee, Y., Hirose, H., Ohneda, M., Johnson, J. H., McGarry, J. D., and Unger, R. H. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 10878-10882 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Hirose, H., Lee, Y. H., Inman, L. R., Nagasawa, Y., Johnson, J. H., and Unger, R. H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5633-5637 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Lenzen, S., and Bailey, C. J. (1984) Endocr. Rev. 5, 411-434 [Abstract]
  20. O'Brien, T. D., Westermark, P., and Johnson, K. H. (1991) Diabetes 40, 1701-1706 [Abstract]
  21. Orland, M. J., and Permutt, M. A. (1991) Diabetes 40, 181-189 [Abstract]
  22. Ogawa, A., Johnson, J. H., Ohneda, M., McAllister, C. T., Inman, L., Alam, T., and Unger, R. H. (1992) J. Clin. Invest. 90, 497-504 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Mulder, H., Ahren, B., Stridsberg, M., and Sundler, F. (1995) Diabetologia 38, 395-402 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Koranyi, L., Bourey, R., Turk, J., Mueckler, M., and Permutt, M. A. (1992) Diabetologia 35, 1125-1132 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Ohneda, M., Johnson, J. H., Inman, L. R., and Unger, R. H. (1993) J. Clin. Invest. 92, 1950-1956 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Fernandez-Mejia, C., and Davidson, M. B. (1992) Endocrinology 130, 1660-1668 [Abstract]
  27. Philippe, J., and Missotten, M. (1990) Endocrinology 127, 1640-1645 [Abstract]
  28. Philippe, J., Giordano, E., Gjinovci, A., and Meda, P. (1992) J. Clin. Invest. 90, 2228-2233 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Gotoh, M., Maki, T., Satomi, S., Porter, J., Bonner-Weir, S., O'Hara, C. J., and Monaco, A. P. (1987) Transplantation 43, 725-730 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Chomczynski, P., and Sacchi, N. (1987) Anal. Biochem. 162, 156-159 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Thorens, B., Sarkar, H. K., Kaback, H. R., and Lodish, H. F. (1988) Cell 55, 281-290 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Enoch, T., Zinn, K., and Maniatis, T. (1986) Mol. Cell. Biol. 6, 801-810 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Thorens, B., Gérard, N., and Dériaz, N. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 123, 1687-1694 [Abstract]
  34. Girardet, M., Geering, K., Franted, J. M., Geser, D., Rossier, B. C., Kraehenbuhl, J. P., and Bron, C. (1981) Biochem. J. 20, 6684-6691
  35. Waeber, G., Thompson, N., Haefliger, J.-A., and Nicod, P. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 26912-26916 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Ferrer, J., Gomis, R., Fernadez-Alvarez, J., Casamitjna, R., and Vilardell, E. (1993) Diabetes 42, 1273-1280 [Abstract]
  37. Tiao, G., Fagan, J., Roegner, V., Lieberman, M., Wang, J.-J., Fischer, J. E., and Hasselgren, P.-O. (1996) J. Clin. Invest. 97, 339-348 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Ward, C. L., Omura, S., and Kopito, R. R. (1995) Cell 83, 121-127 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Jensen, T. J., Loo, M. A., Pind, S., Williams, D. B., Goldberg, A. L., and Riordan, J. R. (1995) Cell 83, 129-135 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Lemberger, T., Staels, B., Saladin, R., Desvergne, B., Auwerx, J., and Wahli, W. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 24527-24530 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Khan, A., Östenson, C.-G., Berggren, P.-O., and Efendic, S. (1992) Am. J. Physiol. 263, E663-E666 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Khan, A., Hong-Lie, C., and Landau, B. R. (1995) Endocrinology 136, 1934-1938 [Abstract]
  43. Jamal, H., Jones, P. M., Byrne, J., Suda, K., Ghatei, M. A., Kanse, S. M., and Bloom, S. R. (1991) Endocrinology 129, 3372-3380 [Abstract]
  44. Wang, Z.-L., Bennett, W. M., Wang, R.-M., Ghatei, M. A., and Bloom, S. R. (1994) Endocrinology 135, 200-206 [Abstract]
  45. Shafrir, E. (1990) in Diabetes Mellitus: Theory and Practice (Rifkin, H., and Porte, D., Jr., eds), 4th Ed., pp. 299-340, Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., New York

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.