Biotin Sulfoxide Reductase
HETEROLOGOUS EXPRESSION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A FUNCTIONAL MOLYBDOPTERIN GUANINE DINUCLEOTIDE-CONTAINING ENZYME*

(Received for publication, July 22, 1996, and in revised form, October 24, 1996)

Veronica V. Pollock and Michael J. Barber Dagger

From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine and H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33612

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgment
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Rhodobacter sphaeroides f. sp. denitrificans biotin sulfoxide reductase has been heterologously expressed in Escherichia coli as a functional 106-kDa glutathione S-transferase fusion protein. Following cleavage with Factor Xa and purification to homogeneity, the soluble 83-kDa enzyme retained biotin sulfoxide reductase activity using reduced methyl viologen or reduced benzyl viologen as artificial electron donors. Initial rate kinetics indicated a specific activity at pH 8.0 of 0.9 µmol of biotin sulfoxide reduced per min/nmol of enzyme and Km values of 29 and 15 µM for reduced methyl viologen and biotin sulfoxide reductase, respectively. Biotin sulfoxide reductase was also capable of reducing nicotinamide N-oxide, methionine sulfoxide, trimethylamine-N-oxide, and dimethyl sulfoxide, although with varying efficiencies, and could directly utilize NADPH as a reducing agent, both for the reduction of biotin sulfoxide and ferricyanide. The enzyme contained the prosthetic group, molybdopterin guanine dinucleotide, and did not require any accessory proteins for functionality. These results represent the first successful heterologous expression and characterization of a functional molybdopterin guanine dinucleotide-containing enzyme and the demonstration of reduced pyridine nucleotide-dependent biotin sulfoxide reductase activity.


INTRODUCTION

Biotin sulfoxide (BSO)1 reductase, which catalyzes the reduction of d-biotin d-sulfoxide to d-biotin according to the following scheme,
<SC><UP>d</UP></SC><UP>-Biotin <SC>d</SC>-sulfoxide</UP>+2<UP>e<SUP>−</SUP></UP>+2<UP>H<SUP>+</SUP></UP>→ <SC><UP>d</UP></SC><UP>-biotin</UP>+<UP> H<SUB>2</SUB>O</UP> (Eq. 1)
has been postulated to function in a variety of roles in bacterial metabolism (Pierson and Campbell, 1990) including scavenging biotin sulfoxide from the environment and thus allowing bacteria to utilize this oxidized form of biotin for biosynthetic reactions: reducing bound intracellular biotin, such as bound to biotin-containing carboxylases or protein degradation products, that have become oxidized in aerobic environments; or as a potential protector of the cell from oxidative damage similar to the proposed roles of methionine sulfoxide reductase (Ejiri et al., 1980; Brot et al., 1981; Rahman et al., 1992) and superoxide dismutase (Fridovich, 1989).

BSO reductase has been partially purified from Escherichia coli and demonstrated to be a soluble protein that requires an unidentified form of the Mo cofactor (Rajagopalan and Johnson, 1992) and several accessory proteins for activity (del Campillo-Campbell and Campbell, 1982). These accessory proteins include a small, heat stable, thioredoxin-like protein moiety, referred to as protein-(SH)2 and which functions as a source of reducing equivalents and an unidentified flavoprotein (del Campillo-Campbell et al., 1979). The extensive characterization of BSO reductase has been limited by the low natural abundance of the protein, its constitutive expression, and the requirement for auxiliary proteins for activity coupled with the difficulty of its detection in the absence of specific antibodies. While the E. coli BSO reductase bisC structural gene has been cloned and sequenced, the enzyme has not been produced using heterologous expression systems.

Biotin sulfoxide reductase, either from E. coli or Rhodobacter sphaeroides (Pollock and Barber, 1995), together with R. sphaeroides Me2SO reductase (Barber et al., 1995) and E. coli trimethylamine N-oxide reductase (Mejean et al., 1994) are unique members of the small class of metalloenzymes that require Mo for functionality as their sole prosthetic group. Previous attempts to develop E. coli-based heterologous expression systems for this group of MGD-containing enzymes has been limited to R. sphaeroides Me2SO reductase, where the enzyme was produced in an insoluble and inactive form (Hilton and Rajagopalan, 1996a).

We have heterologously expressed the R. sphaeroides BSO reductase as a GST fusion protein (Smith and Johnson, 1988) facilitating its isolation as a homogeneous, functional enzyme that contains MGD as its sole prosthetic group. Initial rate kinetic studies have demonstrated that the enzyme can use a variety of substrates, in addition to BSO and have established for the first time that the enzyme can also directly use NADPH as an efficient electron donor.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemicals, Enzymes, and Reagents

Restriction enzymes and Factor Xa protease were purchased from Promega (Madison, WI), U. S. Biochemical Corp., and New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA). Media for bacterial growth was purchased from Difco, and aprotinin, nucleotide pyrophosphatase (type III), antibiotics, biotin, thiamine hydrochloride, methyl viologen, benzyl viologen, p-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde, reduced glutathione, reduced thioredoxin (Spirulina sp.) and basic buffer chemicals were purchased from Sigma. Agarose, urea, SDS, acrylamide and bisacrylamide, protein molecular weight markers, as well as protein assay solution, were purchased from Bio-Rad. Isopropylthio-beta -galactoside was purchased from Research Products International Corp. (Mt. Prospect, IL) and ProBlottTM nylon membrane was purchased from Applied Biosystems. d-Biotin d-sulfoxide was prepared as described by Pollock and Barber (1995).

Bacterial Strains

E. coli JM109 was purchased from Promega. The mutant strain of E. coli Delta Mu29 (E. coli Delta Mu29 is bio-, bis-, thi-, strr) was a generous gift from Dr. Allan Campbell (Stanford University). R. sphaeroides f. sp. denitrificans IL 106 were the generous gift of Dr. T. Satoh (Hiroshima University).

Vectors

pUC19 was purchased from Boehringer Mannheim and the GST fusion protein expression vector, pGEX-5X-2, was purchased from Pharmacia Biotech Inc.

GST-BSO Reductase Expression Vector Construction

The entire 2.4-kilobase BSO reductase coding region was excised from the pUC19 construct (Pollock and Barber, 1995) using EcoRI and SalI restriction enzymes and cloned into the EcoRI and SalI sites of the pGEX-5X-2 expression vector. DNA sequencing was performed on this construct to confirm the proper junction sites and reading frame for the BSO reductase gene using the Sequenase Version 2 (U. S. Biochemical Corp.) sequencing kit and [alpha -35S]dATP.

Protein Expression and Purification

Overnight cultures of E. coli JM109 transformed with either the pGEX-5X-2 vector containing the BSO reductase sequence, or the vector alone as a control, were diluted 1/100 in LB supplemented with ampicillin (100 µg/ml final concentration) and sodium molybdate (1 mM final concentration) and grown at 37 °C to an OD600 of 0.8. Isopropylthio-beta -galactoside (0.1 mM final concentration) was added to induce protein expression and the cells were grown for an additional 4 h at 24 ° C. The cells were harvested by centrifugation, resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline supplemented with dithiothreitol (10 mM), sodium molybdate (1 mM), aprotinin (0.1 mg/ml), EDTA (1 mM), and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (0.1 mM), and sonicated on ice. The sonicated cells were centrifuged at 30,000 × g for 30 min and the supernatant chromatographed on a glutathione-agarose affinity column (8-ml matrix volume) pre-equilibrated with phosphate-buffered saline. Following several washes with phosphate-buffered saline, the bound fusion protein was eluted with 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, containing 10 mM GSSH, pH 8. Fractions exhibiting MV:BSOR activity were concentrated by pressure filtration (PM-10, Amicon) and stored in liquid nitrogen. Following cleavage with Factor Xa, the affinity-purified BSO reductase complex was re-chromatographed using glutathione-agarose to remove the GST portion of the fusion protein. Further purification of the BSO reductase to separate the enzyme from auxiliary proteins was achieved utilizing fast protein liquid chromatography gel filtration on a Superose 12 column (1 × 30 cm, Pharmacia) in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8, and anion exchange on a Mono-Q column (0.5 × 5 cm) utilizing a salt gradient from 0 to 0.5 M NaCl.

Untransformed E. coli JM 109 and Delta Mu29 cells were grown in LB to an OD600 of 2.0, respectively. Cells were harvested and disrupted using identical methods to those described for the transformed cells and the supernatants assayed for both NADPH:BSOR and BSO-independent NADPH-oxidation activities, prior to and following dialysis, in 50 mM Tris, pH 8. R. sphaeroides cells were grown either aerobically in LB or anaerobically in the presence of 0.2% nitrate to an OD600 of 2.5, harvested, and processed as described for the E. coli cells. R. sphaeroides Me2SO reductase was isolated as described previously (Barber et al., 1995).

Factor Xa Proteolysis

Protein samples were subjected to cleavage by Factor Xa (1% w/w) in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, containing 150 mM NaCl and 1 mM CaCl2, pH 8, at 16° C for 16 h.

Protein Analysis

BSO reductase purity was assessed by both SDS-PAGE and reverse-phase HPLC analysis. Enzyme samples (1-10 µg of total protein) were analyzed using either 10 or 12.5% SDS-PAGE gels (Laemmli, 1970) stained with Coomassie Blue. For reverse-phase HPLC analysis, BSO reductase (30 µg) was mixed with an equal volume of 8 M guanidine hydrochloride, acidified with 0.5% acetic acid, and chromatographed on a C4 column (4.6 × 30 mm) using a linear gradient of trifluoroacetic acid (0.1%) to trifluoroacetic acid (0.1%), acetonitrile (70%).

Molybdenum Cofactor Analysis

Samples of BSO reductase and Me2SO reductase were denatured with 1% SDS for 12 h followed by boiling for 20 min. The SDS was removed by precipitation with KCl (0.250 M), the samples centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 5 min, and the denatured protein separated from the cofactor utilizing ultrafiltration spin columns ("ultrafree-MC" 5,000 MW cut-off, Millipore Corp.). The cofactor-containing solution was assayed for protein and its UV visible and fluorescence spectra recorded. For nucleotide pyrophosphatase cleavage, MgCl2, and lyophilized pyrophosphatase were added to the cofactor-containing solution which was incubated at 37 °C for 15 min following which the cofactor was separated from the pyrophosphatase by ultrafiltration.

Protein Sequencing

NH2-terminal sequencing was performed as described by Pollock and Barber (1995). For the generation and sequencing of internal peptides, protein samples were separated by SDS-PAGE, transbloted onto nylon membranes, and subjected to in situ proteolytic cleavage. Excised membrane sections were first blocked with polyvinyl pyrrolidone (1% in methanol) for 30 min, extensively washed with water and immersed in 100 µl of protease digestion buffer (0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8, 1% Triton X-100 and 10% acetonitrile). Endoproteinase Lys-C (1 µg) was added, and digestion continued at 37 °C overnight. Following proteolysis, the peptide-containing solution was denatured with guanidine hydrochloride, acidified with acetic acid, and individual peptides separated by reverse-phase HPLC (Vydac C18 column, 4.6 × 250 mm) as described by Neame and Barber (1989).

Spectroscopic Analysis

UV-visible spectra were obtained using a Shimadzu Scientific Inst. Inc. (Columbia MD) UV2101PC spectrophotometer and fluorescence spectra were obtained using a JASCO (Easton, MD) FP770 spectrofluorimeter. UV CD spectra were obtained using a JASCO J710 spectropolarimeter as described by Trimboli et al. (1996).

Enzyme Activities

Biotin Analysis Using Reverse-phase HPLC

The conversion of BSO to biotin was performed using MES buffer, pH 6 (140 µl of 114 mM), BSO (50 µl of 5 mg/ml), MVplusdu (500 µl of 100 mM in 50 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.5, reduced with H2 and Pt-asbestos) and homogeneous BSO reductase (30 µl of 0.5 µg/µl). The buffer solution containing BSO was made anaerobic and extensively bubbled with argon. MVplusdu was added followed by the BSO reductase and the reaction allowed to proceed anaerobically until the MVplusdu had been depleted (about 5-10 min, final solution pH of 8). The reaction mixture was filtered (5,000 Mr cut-off ultrafiltration spin column) to separate the protein and reaction products and the latter subsequently analyzed by reverse-phase HPLC (Vydac C18 column, 4.6 × 250 mm) using a linear gradient of trifluoroacetic acid (0.05%, pH 2.5) to trifluoroacetic acid (0.05%, pH 2.5), acetonitrile (70:30, v/v) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. Control reactions contained MVplusdu and buffer; BSO, MVplusdu and buffer; biotin (50 µl of 5 mg/ml), MVplusdu , and buffer; BSO, MVplusdu , heat-inactivated BSO reductase, and buffer, respectively.

Disk Microbiological Assay

The disk microbiological assay was performed using a modified version of that previously described by Pollock and Barber (1995). E. coli Delta Mu29 (bio-, bis-, thi-), which cannot grow in the absence of biotin or in the presence of BSO and absence of biotin, was deposited onto minimal glucose plates supplemented with tetrazolium (0.0116%), thi (10 µg/ml), and str (75 µg/ml). The conversion of BSO to biotin was performed as described for the reverse-phase HPLC analysis of the BSO reductase reaction and the reaction products separated from the protein by ultrafiltration. Following dilution with water, aliquots (25 µl) of each reaction product were applied to filter disks placed on top of the minimal glucose plates containing E. coli Delta Mu29. The plates were incubated at 37 °C overnight and inspected for bacterial growth, detectable as the formation of red colonies surrounding the filter circles.

Spectrophotometric Assays

BSO reductase activities were routinely determined at 600 nm under anaerobic conditions at 25 °C in 50 mM Tris buffer, pH 8, as the oxidation of either MVplusdu (115 µM) or BVplusdu (115 µM) in the presence of BSO (1.7 mM). Concentrations of MVplusdu or BVplusdu were calculated using extinction coefficients of 13 mM-1 cm-1 (epsilon 600 nm) (Thorneley, 1974) and 13 mM-1 cm-1 (epsilon 555 nm) (Lissolo et al., 1984), respectively. Activities were expressed in units of micromole of BSO consumed per min/nmol of enzyme. Kinetic parameters were derived using the software "Enzfitter" (Elsevier Biosoft, Ferguson, MO).

NADPH:BSOR and NADPH:FR activities, expressed as micromole of NADPH consumed per min/nmol of enzyme, were determined at 340 nm in 50 mM Tris buffer, pH 8.0, in the presence of either NADPH (250 µM) and BSO (1.7 mM) or NADPH (250 µM) and Fe(CN)63- (630 µM), respectively. NADPH:BSOR activity was also determined in the presence and absence of added E. coli or R. sphaeroides cell lysate supernatant, prior to and following dialysis of the supernatant. In addition, cell lysates were also assayed for endogenous NADPH oxidation, both in the presence and absence of BSO.

BSO reduction to biotin was also monitored at 533 nm using the colorimetric reagent, p-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde (McCormick and Roth, 1970). GST activities were determined at 340 nm and 25 °C in 25 mM MOPS buffer, pH 7, in the presence of 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (1 mM) and GSSH (0.5 mM) (Habig et al., 1974).


RESULTS

Expression of the GST-BSO Reductase Fusion Protein

The results of expression studies using E. coli harboring the GST-BSO reductase expression vector are shown in Fig. 1. Optimal expression of the soluble form of the GST-BSO reductase fusion protein was obtained using low concentrations of isopropylthio-beta -galactoside (0.1 mM) coupled with bacterial culture at room temperature for 5 h. Elevated temperatures or longer growth periods resulted in decreased production of the soluble fusion protein and a corresponding increase in the formation of inclusion bodies. Under optimum expression conditions and compared to control cells containing the GST expression vector without the BSO reductase gene, the GST-BSO reductase fusion protein could be detected as the presence of an additional protein band of molecular mass approximately 106 kDa in both the pellet (Fig. 1, lane P) and soluble (Fig. 1, lane S) protein fractions. Quantitation of protein expression levels suggested that the soluble GST-BSO reductase fusion protein represented 2-3% of the total soluble protein while the insoluble form represented 8-10% of the pellet fraction. In comparison, control cells containing the vector alone produced a major, soluble, protein with a molecular mass of 26 kDa, that exhibited GST activity (data not shown).


Fig. 1. Detection of expressed R. sphaeroides BSO reductase protein by SDS-PAGE. Protein samples (2-10 µg of total protein) were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie Blue following separation. Lanes P and S correspond to the pellet and soluble fractions obtained from sonicated cells, respectively. Lane A corresponds to the affinity-purified GST-BSO reductase fusion protein complex prior to (u) and following (c) Factor Xa cleavage. Lanes B and C correspond to different fractions obtained following fast protein liquid chromatography gel filtration of the GST-BSO reductase fusion protein complex that retained MV:BSO reductase activity prior to (u) and following (c) Factor Xa cleavage, respectively. Lane MW corresponds to molecular weight markers.
[View Larger Version of this Image (89K GIF file)]


BSO Reductase Isolation

Under optimal conditions, the yield of purified BSO reductase protein corresponded to 1 mg from 8 liters of cells (8 g). The individual steps utilized to purify the BSO reductase to homogeneity together with the respective yields are indicated in Table I. The initial affinity purification of the soluble E. coli cell extract using glutathione-agarose resulted in the isolation of a complex protein mixture that exhibited both GST activity and MV:BSOR activity indicating the presence of the required fusion protein. Examination of the protein composition of this sample indicated the presence of four proteins, detected as individual bands corresponding to molecular masses of 106, 70, 60, and 26 kDa, respectively, following SDS-PAGE analysis (Fig. 1, lane A, u). The high molecular mass band, corresponding to a molecular mass of 106 kDa, that occasionally appeared as a doublet following SDS-PAGE, was subsequently identified as the GST-BSO reductase fusion protein by a combination of Factor Xa proteolysis and its retention of both GST and MV:BSOR activity. However, this band was usually partially proteolyzed even without the addition of Factor Xa, evident as the presence of the small 26-kDa GST fragment. Following proteolysis with Factor Xa (Fig. 1, lane A, c), the 106-kDa band was converted to two bands with apparent molecular masses of 80 and 26 kDa, respectively, the former retaining MV:BSOR activity and the latter retaining GST activity. Direct analysis of the amino terminus of the 80-kDa protein yielded the sequence shown in Table II, confirming the identity of this protein as BSO reductase while the 26-kDa protein corresponded to the cleaved GST expression tag.

Table I.

Purification of recombinant R. sphaeroides BSO reductase


Purification step Activity
Protein Specific activity
Recovery Fold
NADPH MV·+ NADPH MV·+

unitsa unitsb mg units/mga units/mgb %
Cell supernatant 520 15.6 81.0 6.42 0.193 100 1.00
Affinity chromatography 400 12.0 4.60 87.0 2.61 77 13.5
Factor Xa cleavage 348 10.4 3.10 112 3.35 67 17.4
Anion exchange 331 9.93 1.05 315 9.46 64 49.0
Gel filtration 322 9.66 1.00 322 9.66 62 50.1

a  Units: µmol of NADPH consumed/min (NADPH:BSO reductase activity).
b  Units: µmol of BSO consumed/min (MV:BSO reductase activity).

Table II.

Amino acid sequences obtained for BSO reductase and auxiliary proteins


Protein Molecular mass Sequence identity Sequence

kDa
BSO reductase 80 Amino terminus YPITRVPH
hsp70 70 Internal peptides IIAADNGDAWVEVK
KMQELAQV
LMEIAQQQHAQQQTAGADA
groEL 60 Amino terminus AAKDVKFGNDARVKM

Analysis of the affinity-purified GST-BSO protein complex indicated that two additional protein components, corresponding to molecular masses of 70 and 60 kDa, respectively, consistently co-purified with the fusion protein. These two additional proteins were tightly associated since they were only partially resolved by fast protein liquid chromatography gel filtration of the complex (Fig. 1, lanes B and C).

To confirm that the two auxiliary proteins bound specifically to BSO reductase and not the intact fusion protein, the isolated GST-BSO reductase fusion protein complex (Fig. 2, lane A) was treated with Factor Xa and affinity purified using glutathione-agarose. The flow-through from the column contained BSO reductase, identified by the retention of MV:BSOR activity, and both the 70- and 60-kDa auxiliary proteins (Fig. 2, lane B), whereas the cleaved GST portion remained bound to the column and could subsequently be eluted with GSSH as the sole protein (Fig. 2, lane C). BSO reductase could be resolved from the auxiliary proteins by ion exchange chromatography yielding a homogeneous enzyme (Fig. 2, lane D).


Fig. 2. SDS-PAGE analysis of R. sphaeroides BSO reductase. Protein samples (5-10 µg of protein) obtained from the various isolation steps were separated by SDS-PAGE. Lane A corresponds to glutathione-agarose affinity purified GST-BSO reductase fusion protein complex. Lane B corresponds to Factor Xa-treated GST-BSO reductase fusion protein complex following glutathione-agarose affinity chromatography. Lane C corresponds to the GST fragment obtained following elution of the glutathione-agarose affinity column with glutathione (10 mM). Lane D corresponds to BSO reductase obtained following ion-exchange chromatography. Lane MW corresponds to molecular weight markers.
[View Larger Version of this Image (63K GIF file)]


The purity of the isolated BSO reductase obtained following ion exchange and gel filtration chromatography was also examined using reverse-phase HPLC. The HPLC chromatogram indicated the presence of a single protein peak corresponding to an elution time of 40.5 min (data not shown).

Auxiliary Protein Identification

To identify the 60-kDa auxiliary protein that bound to BSO reductase, the amino terminus of the protein was examined yielding the sequence shown in Table II. This sequence was identical to the first 15 residues (AAKDVKFGNDARVKM) of the E. coli groEL protein (Hemmingsen et al., 1988). In contrast, we were unable to obtain any reliable sequence from the amino-terminal region of the 70-kDa protein. However, following proteolysis, three internal peptides were obtained which yielded the sequences shown in Table II, confirming the identity of this protein as E. coli hsp70 (Bardwell and Craig, 1984) and corresponding to residues 93-106 (IIAADNGDAWVEVK), 587-594 (KMQELAQV) and 598-616 (LMEIAQQQHAQQQTAGADA), respectively. Attempts to increase the level of soluble BSO reductase expression, by co-transformation of the JM109 cells with the groEL gene, failed to increase production of the soluble fusion protein-chaperonin complex.

Spectroscopic Analysis

The UV-visible spectral characteristics of the native and SDS-treated BSO reductase and a sample of purified, oxidized R. sphaeroides Me2SO reductase are shown in Table III. Oxidized BSO reductase exhibited a protein peak at 278 nm with a broad shoulder centered around 370 nm with very little absorbance at higher wavelengths indicating the absence of any additional chromophores. Denaturation of both enzymes resulted in an increased intensity for both the dominant protein peak at 278 nm and increased resolution of the Mo cofactor peak, detected at approximately 375 nm, when compared to the spectra obtained for the native enzymes, consistent with cofactor release.

Table III.

UV-visible spectral characteristics of BSO and Me2SO reductases

Protein concentrations were 10 µM.
Protein Absorbance
Native
SDS-treated
 lambda 280  lambda 375  lambda 280  lambda 375

BSO reductase 0.590 0.033 0.673 0.082
Me2SO reductase 0.591 0.038 0.686 0.089

UV CD spectra of both BSO reductase and Me2SO reductase were very similar and typical of proteins of the alpha /beta class. BSO reductase exhibited a positive CD maximum at 192 nm and negative CD maxima at 209 and approximately 219 nm, respectively, whereas Me2SO reductase exhibited CD maxima at 192, 209, and 221 nm, respectively.

Cofactor Analysis

To identify the Mo cofactor bound to the recombinant BSO reductase, the purified enzyme (Fig. 2, lane D) was denatured with SDS and the cofactor isolated. The UV-visible absorbance spectrum of the isolated Mo cofactor is shown in Fig. 3, together with the spectrum obtained from a corresponding sample of R. sphaeroides Me2SO reductase, a known MGD-containing enzyme (Johnson et al., 1990). The spectrum of the isolated cofactor exhibited an additional peak at 249 nm due to absorption by the 5'-GMP portion of the cofactor. Identical results have previously been reported for Me2SO reductase by Johnson et al. (1990).


Fig. 3. UV-visible spectra of the molybdenum cofactor isolated from BSO reductase. BSO reductase and Me2SO reductase (8 µM each enzyme) were purified to homogeneity and denatured with 1% SDS followed by boiling for 30 min, respectively. Protein and cofactor were separated by ultrafiltration and the spectrum of the isolated cofactor recorded for BSO reductase (-) and Me2SO reductase (-··-··-).
[View Larger Version of this Image (16K GIF file)]


To confirm the identity of the Mo cofactor as MGD, fluorescence emission spectra of the isolated cofactor, both prior to and following pyrophosphatase cleavage, were obtained and compared to those from a sample of cofactor isolated from Me2SO reductase. Incubation of the liberated MGD cofactor with pyrophosphatase, resulting in hydrolysis of the pyrophosphate linkage between the molybdopterin and 5'-GMP moieties, produced an increase in the fluorescence intensity (Table IV) of both samples with no shift in the fluorescence emission maxima which were determined to be 469 nm for the cofactor isolated from BSO reductase and 468 nm for MGD isolated from Me2SO reductase.

Table IV.

Fluorescence emission spectral data for BSO and Me2SO reductase Mo cofactors

Excitation of enzyme samples (10 µM protein) was performed at 370 nm in 10 mM phosphate buffer, pH 8.0. 
Protein  lambda max Fluorescence intensity prior to pyrophosphatase cleavage Fluorescence intensity following pyrophosphatase cleavage

nm
BSO reductase 469 57% 90%
Me2SO 468 54% 83%

Enzyme Activities

HPLC Analysis

The ability of the isolated BSO reductase to convert BSO to biotin, utilizing MVplusdu as an electron donor, was initially examined using reverse-phase HPLC analysis of the reaction products, as shown in Fig. 4. Under the conditions used for analysis, standard samples of BSO and biotin eluted at 9.2 min (peak 1, Trace C) and 18.7 min (peak 2, Trace B), respectively, while the large early peak present in all the elution profiles was due to the presence of MV. In the absence of BSO reductase or in the presence of heat-inactivated enzyme, none of the substrate was reduced to biotin (Traces C and D, respectively). However, in the presence of BSO reductase (Trace E), approximately 50% of the BSO was converted to biotin as evident by the decrease in the amplitude of the peak at 9.2 min and the appearance of the peak at 18.7 min due to biotin formation.


Fig. 4. Reverse-phase HPLC analysis of the BSO reductase reaction products. The MVplusdu -dependent reduction of BSO to biotin by BSO reductase was carried out as described under "Materials and Methods," the enzyme was removed and the reaction products were separated by reverse-phase HPLC. Trace A, reaction products formed in the absence of BSO. Trace B, biotin standard (peak 2). Trace C, BSO standard (peak 1). Trace D, reaction products formed in the presence of heat-inactivated BSO reductase. Trace E, reaction products formed in the presence of BSO reductase.
[View Larger Version of this Image (18K GIF file)]


HPLC analysis was also utilized to examine the conversion of BSO to biotin catalyzed by BSO reductase using reduced glutathione and reduced thioredoxin as potential electron donors. Incubation of BSO reductase (5 µg) and BSO (1.6 mM) for 2 h at 25 °C in 50 mM Tris buffer, pH 8, in the presence of reduced glutathione (10 mM) or reduced thioredoxin (1 mM) and EDTA (1 mM), respectively, followed by HPLC analysis of the reaction mixture failed to indicate the formation of biotin, suggesting both reducing agents failed to function as suitable electron donors for BSO reductase.

Disk Microbiological Assay

To confirm that the BSO reductase reaction product eluting at 18.7 min on reverse-phase HPLC was biotin, we utilized this reaction product as well as control samples of BSO and biotin, in the disk biological assay as shown in Fig. 5. E. coli Delta Mu29 mutants were unable to grow utilizing either the products of the reaction between MVplusdu and BSO (Disk c), the products of the reaction between MVplusdu , BSO, and heat-inactivated enzyme (Disk a), MVplusdu (Disk d) or BSO in water (Disk f). In contrast, the Delta Mu29 mutants grew, visible as red halos surrounding the disc, in either the presence of the products of the reaction between MVplusdu , BSO, and BSO reductase (Disk b), MVplusdu and biotin (Disk e), or biotin in water (Disk g). Thus the test organism grew well only around the two disks containing authentic biotin or the product of the BSO reductase-catalyzed reaction.


Fig. 5. Microbiological disk assay for BSO reductase activity. The disk biological assay was utilized to confirm the presence of biotin as a product of BSO reductase activity. The reactions were performed as described under "Materials and Methods" with E. coli Delta Mu29 as the test organism. Diluted aliquots (20 µl) containing the in vitro reaction products that had been separated from the protein by ultrafiltration were applied to the nitrocellulose disks. Disk a, MVplusdu , BSO, and heat-inactivated BSO reductase. Disk b, MVplusdu , BSO, and BSO reductase. Disk c, MVplusdu and BSO. Disk d, MVplusdu alone. Disk e, MVplusdu and biotin. Disk f, BSO in water. Disk g, biotin in water. The red colonies present around some of the disks indicate growth of the test organism due to the presence of biotin.
[View Larger Version of this Image (77K GIF file)]


Initial Rate Kinetics

The results of the previous two assays indicated that MVplusdu could function as a facile electron donor for BSO reductase and therefore could also be used in the first direct spectrophotometric assay for BSOR activity. Analysis of the initial rate measurements of the consumption of MVplusdu in the presence of BSO and several alternative electron acceptors yielded the kinetic constants shown in Table V.

Table V.

Initial rate kinetic constants obtained for MV·+-dependent R. sphaeroides BSO reductase activities


Compound Vmax Km Vmax/Km

unitsa µM
Oxidizing substrateb
  d-Biotin d-sulfoxide 0.9 15 6.1  × 10-2
  Nicotinamide N-oxide 0.9 20 4.6  × 10-2
  l-Methionine sulfoxide 0.9 807 1.2  × 10-3
  dl-Methionine sulfoxide 0.9 850 1.1  × 10-3
  Trimethylamine N-oxide 0.9 11,050 8.5  × 10-5
  Dimethyl sulfoxide 0.9 14,440 6.4  × 10-5
Reducing substrateb
  MV·+ 0.9 29 3.1  × 10-2
  BV·+ 0.9 35 2.5  × 10-2

a  1 unit corresponds to 1 µmol of BSO consumed per min/nmol enzyme.
b  Oxidizing substrate specificity was determined using MV·+ as the electron donor while reducing substrate specificity was determined using BSO as acceptor.

Under the conditions of the assay, all Lineweaver-Burk plots were linear over the entire range of donor and acceptor substrate concentrations examined except for assays performed in the presence of high concentrations of BSO (>2 mM), nicotinamide N-oxide (>5 mM), and methionine sulfoxide (>2.5 mM) where pronounced substrate inhibition was observed. At pH 8.0 and using 50 mM Tris buffer, BSO reductase yielded a Vmax of 0.9 µmol of BSO consumed/min/nmol enzyme and Km values of 29 and 15 µM for MVplusdu and BSO, respectively. MVplusdu could be replaced by BVplusdu with no change in Vmax (0.9 µmol of BSO consumed/min/nmol of enzyme) but an increase in Km to 35 µM, suggesting the enzyme exhibited very little specificity with respect to the nature of the artificial electron donor. However, the enzyme could also utilize additional oxidizing substrates including nicotinamide N-oxide, methionine sulfoxide, trimethylamine N-oxide, and Me2SO with comparable rates to that obtained with BSO although the Km values for these substrates varied from a low of 20 µM (nicotinamide N-oxide) to a high of 14.4 mM (Me2SO). However, values for Vmax/Km indicated BSO reductase exhibited a marked preference for BSO as the oxidizing substrate.

Equivalent kinetic constants were also obtained for the MV:BSOR activity of the isolated GST-BSO reductase fusion protein indicating that the GST domain had no influence on the catalytic activity of the BSO reductase domain.

NAD(P)H-dependent BSO Reductase Activity

The presence of a putative ATP/GTP-binding P-loop in the BSO reductase sequence (Pollock and Barber, 1995), prompted the examination of reduced pyridine nucleotides as potential electron donors for the enzyme. Under aerobic conditions and in the absence of BSO, consumption of either NADPH or NADH by BSO reductase was not observed. In contrast, in the presence of BSO, rapid consumption of NAD(P)H was detected resulting in the conversion of BSO to biotin which was subsequently confirmed by both HPLC analysis and the disk microbiological assay of the reaction mixture. BSO reduction was dependent on the presence of the enzyme since in its absence or in the presence of heat-inactivated enzyme, no NADPH was consumed or biotin produced. The results of initial rate studies at pH 8.0, shown in Table VI, indicated that the purified enzyme exhibited a NADPH:BSOR specific activity of 30 µmol of NADPH consumed/min/nmol of enzyme with Km values of 269 and 524 µM for NADPH and BSO, respectively. BSO reductase was also capable of utilizing NADH as an electron donor, although with greatly reduced efficiency, the specific activity being reduced approximately 11-fold from that determined with NADPH while the Km for NADH was increased to 394 µM. NADPH also functioned as a suitable electron donor for the reduction of a variety of alternative oxidizing substrates (Table VI) although BSO remained the preferred substrate. Identical studies performed using purified R. sphaeroides Me2SO reductase revealed that in contrast to BSO reductase, Me2SO reductase did not exhibit any reduced pyridine nucleotide dependent activity.

Table VI.

Initial rate kinetic constants obtained for reduced pyridine nucleotide-dependent R. sphaeroides BSO reductase activities


Compound Vmax Km Vmax/Km

unitsa µM
Oxidizing substrateb
  d-Biotin d-sulfoxide 30.0 524 5.7  × 10-2
  Nicotinamide N-oxide 19.8 414 4.8  × 10-2
  l-Methionine sulfoxide 6.2 10,000 6.0  × 10-4
  dl-Methionine sulfoxide 6.1 10,070 6.0  × 10-4
  Trimethylamine N-oxide 30.8 482,000 1.0  × 10-4
  Dimethyl sulfoxide 9.6 207,000 4.6  × 10-5
  Ferricyanide 1.7 662 2.6  × 10-3
Reducing substrateb
  NADPH 30.0 269 1.1  × 10-1
  NADH 2.8 394 7.1  × 10-3

a  1 Unit corresponds to 1 µmol of NADPH consumed per min/nmol enzyme.
b  Oxidizing substrate specificity was determined using NADPH as the electron donor while reducing substrate specificity was determined using BSO as acceptor.

To determine if auxiliary proteins present in E. coli or R. sphaeroides cell lysates could enhance the activity of the purified BSO reductase, activities were examined in the presence and absence of either E. coli or R. sphaeroides cell extracts. Undialyzed cell lysates were observed to inhibit NADPH:BSOR activity approximately 2-fold, however, dialysis of the lysates to remove low molecular weight species resulted in no inhibition nor stimulation of enzyme activity, suggesting that in contrast to the E. coli BSO reductase the R. sphaeroides enzyme did not require any auxiliary proteins for functionality.

In the presence of NADPH, BSO reductase was also able to utilize ferricyanide as an artificial electron acceptor. At pH 8.0, the enzyme exhibited a NADPH:FR specific activity of 1.7 µmol of NADPH consumed/min/nmol of enzyme with Km values of 16 and 662 µM for NADPH and Fe(CN)63-, respectively.


DISCUSSION

The preceding results demonstrate the first successful heterologous expression and isolation to homogeneity of a functional BSO reductase that contains MGD as its sole prosthetic group and which is catalytically active in the absence of any auxiliary protein components. In addition, we have provided the first demonstration that the enzyme can directly utilize reduced pyridine nucleotides as a source of reducing equivalents and also obtained initial rate kinetic constants that indicate that BSO reductase can utilize a variety of alternate oxidizing substrates in addition to d-biotin d-sulfoxide.

Expression of a recombinant BSO reductase as a GST fusion protein presented several potential advantages for the production of a functional molybdoprotein. First, the system allowed the affinity purification of the BSO reductase under reducing conditions which could be important when cells are broken by sonication to prevent damage of the Mo cofactor due to oxidation by free radicals, while second, glutathione-agarose has previously been used to isolate an active form of the Mo cofactor from xanthine oxidase under reducing conditions (Mendel and Alikulov, 1983) and therefore may stabilize the functional forms of Mo-containing enzymes during purification.

While the cloning of the BSO reductase has not resulted in very high levels of expressed soluble enzyme since the majority of the BSO reductase is produced as inclusion bodies, it has facilitated the isolation and purification of the enzyme to homogeneity in an active form in quantities sufficient for the first spectroscopic and kinetic characterization of the Rhodobacter enzyme.

The isolation of a homogeneous BSO reductase has facilitated both cofactor analysis and limited structural comparisons. The enzyme has been demonstrated to contain MGD, which has also been shown to be the Mo cofactor present in R. sphaeroides Me2SO reductase (Johnson et al., 1990) and a number of other related E. coli Mo-containing enzymes (Rajagopalan and Johnson, 1992). In addition, the spectroscopic and reverse-phase HPLC analyses of the purified enzyme have indicated the absence of any additional chromophores, confirming MGD to be the sole prosthetic group. Comparison of the UV CD spectra obtained for BSO reductase and Me2SO reductase indicates the two proteins have similar conformations, which is also reflected in the extensive sequence conservation (Barber et al., 1995). These results are supported by the recently determined x-ray structure of R. sphaeroides Me2SO reductase which has confirmed that this enzyme contains MGD as its sole prosthetic group and identified it as a mixed alpha /beta protein in terms of its secondary structure (Schindelin et al., 1996).

Previous work on the E. coli BSO reductase resulted in the isolation of enzyme of undetermined purity (del Campillo-Campbell et al., 1979) while measurements of enzyme activity were limited to the use of the disk biological assay, performed in the presence of added cell lysate due to requirements for several auxiliary proteins. In contrast, the recombinant R. sphaeroides BSO reductase has been demonstrated to be fully functional in the absence of any additional auxiliary proteins. Comparison of the specific activity reported for the E. coli BSO reductase with that of the R. sphaeroides enzyme suggests that the latter is significantly more active (the specific activity reported for the E. coli enzyme corresponds to 1.6 × 10-5 µmol of BSO consumed/min/nmol of enzyme while the corresponding value for the R. sphaeroides enzyme is 9 × 10-1 µmol of BSO consumed/min/nmol of enzyme). However, this substantial difference may be partly due to the greater purity of the latter enzyme and the use of an improved assay. While the enzyme was unable to utilize low molecular weight thiol compounds as electron donors, in agreement with previous genetic studies of E. coli BSO reductase (del Campillo-Campbell et al., 1979), reduced viologens were found to act as efficient reductants.

The isolation of a functional BSO reductase has been confirmed by three different assays: the direct analysis of the reaction products using reverse-phase HPLC, the disk microbiological assay, which indirectly confirms the presence of biotin as indicated by the growth of the test organism, and the development of a direct spectrophotometric assay for the enzyme-catalyzed oxidation of MVplusdu in the presence of BSO, similar to the method used to assay the activity of Me2SO reductase (Bastian et al., 1991). The recombinant expression and isolation of a functional Mo-containing enzyme has previously only been described for rat hepatic sulfite oxidase (Garrett and Rajagopalan, 1994). The enzyme was expressed at low levels in E. coli, contained MPT, and retained sulfite:cytochrome c reductase activity, although no specific activities were reported. In contrast, recent attempts to express R. sphaeroides Me2SO reductase in E. coli resulted in the production of the appropriately-sized insoluble recombinant protein which was devoid of Me2SO reductase activity (Hilton and Rajagopalan, 1996a).

In contrast to either E. coli BSO reductase or R. sphaeroides Me2SO reductase, we have demonstrated that R. sphaeroides BSO reductase can directly utilize reduced pyridine nucleotides as electron donors. Analysis of initial rate data has indicated a marked preference for NADPH when compared to NADH, the former yielding values for Vmax/Km directly comparable to those obtained using MVplusdu as the source of reducing equivalents. While both purified Me2SO reductase and partially-purified E. coli BSO reductase are unable to directly use either NADPH or NADH as suitable reducing agents, the E. coli BSO reductase has been shown to exhibit limited NADPH-dependent BSOR activity in the presence of an auxiliary protein referred to as protein-S2 reductase (del Campillo-Campbell et al., 1979).

This work has provided the first information concerning the oxidizing substrate specificity of BSO reductase. While the enzyme functions most efficiently with BSO, nicotinamide N-oxide, methionine sulfoxide, trimethylamine N-oxide, and Me2SO could also be utilized as substrates although with varying efficiencies. While the enzyme was found to utilize nicotinamide N-oxide with a degree of efficiency comparable to that of BSO, markedly reduced efficiencies were observed for the remaining substrates. Although the turnover numbers for all five oxidizing substrates were comparable, the smaller substrates did not appear to bind as tightly to the enzyme as the larger or heterocyclic compounds. In addition, a similar substrate specificity was observed when using either MVplusdu or NADPH as the reducing agent. The MVplusdu -dependent substrate specificity of BSO reductase appears to be the reverse of that for R. sphaeroides Me2SO reductase where substrates such as trimethylamine N-oxide have been shown to bind less tightly than Me2SO (Satoh and Kurihara, 1987). Comparison of the specific activities previously reported for R. sphaeroides Me2SO reductase (Bastian et al., 1991; Hilton and Rajagopalan, 1996b) with that obtained for BSO reductase indicates that the two enzymes have comparable turnover numbers when utilizing Me2SO or BSO as oxidizing substrates, respectively. In addition, our kinetic studies have indicated that BSO reductase can reduce methionine sulfoxide to methionine at a rate approximately 300-fold greater than that obtained for a similar reaction catalyzed by the E. coli enzyme, peptide methionine sulfoxide reductase (Rahman et al., 1992), that has been postulated to provide a repair mechanism for proteins that have been inactivated by oxidation. Thus, the ability of BSO reductase to reduce a variety of oxidized substrates may provide an additional pathway to reverse the results of oxidative damage.

Previous studies of protein expression in E. coli have indicated the involvement of chaperonins in promoting protein folding and inhibiting degradation of foreign proteins by ATP-dependent proteolysis. Thus the expression of a mutant form of alkaline phosphatase (pho61) in E. coli has demonstrated the association of the mutant protein with both hsp70 and grpE chaperonins (Sherman and Goldberg, 1992). For the expression of the fusion protein, CRAG, which contained sequences of cro, protein A, and a 14-amino acid portion of the lacZ gene product, the fusion protein was found to exist in two complexes with either hsp70 (Hellebust et al., 1989) or groEL (Sherman and Goldberg, 1991). groEL has also previously been shown to co-purify with a recombinant form of a plant glucosidase produced as a GST fusion protein (Keresztessy et al., 1996). In contrast, expression of BSO reductase has demonstrated the formation of a specific complex with both hsp70 and groEL and that the GST-BSO reductase fusion protein-chaperonin complex retained activity comparable to that of the purified enzyme suggesting retention of the native conformation in the fusion protein complex. While the precise role of these auxiliary chaperonin proteins in the expression of BSO reductase has not been identified, they may potentially function to assist in the correct folding or assembly of the recombinant protein.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by Grant GM 32696 from the National Institutes of Health. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of South Florida, College of Medicine, Tampa, FL 33612. Tel.: 813-974-9702; Fax: 813-974-9705; E-mail: mbarber{at}nick.med.usf.edu.
1    The abbreviations used are: BSO, d-biotin d-sulfoxide; Me2SO, dimethyl sulfoxide; MGD, molybdopterin guanine dinucleotide; MPT, molybdopterin; thi, thiamine hydrochloride; str, streptomycin sulfate; amp, ampicillin; GST, glutathione S-transferase; MVplusdu , reduced methyl viologen radical cation; BVplusdu , reduced benzyl viologen radical cation; MV:BSOR, reduced methyl viologen:biotin sulfoxide reductase; NADPH:BSOR, NADPH:biotin sulfoxide reductase; NADPH:FR, NADPH:ferricyanide reductase; GSSH, reduced glutathione; MOPS, 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid; MES, 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography.

Acknowledgment

We are grateful to Dr. Peter Neame for assistance with peptide sequencing.


REFERENCES

  1. Barber, M. J., Van Valkenburg, H., Trimboli, A. J., Pollock, V. V., Neame, P. J., and Bastian, N. R. (1995) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 320, 266-275 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Bardwell, J. C. A., and Craig, E. A. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81, 848-852 [Abstract]
  3. Bastian, N. R., Kay, C. J., Barber, M. J., and Rajagopalan, K. V. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 45-51 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Brot, N., Weissbach, L., Werth, J., and Weissbach, H. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 78, 2155-2158 [Abstract]
  5. del Campillo-Campbell, A., Dykhuizen, D., and Cleary, P. P. (1979) Methods Enzymol. 62, 379-385 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. del Campillo-Campbell, A., and Campbell, A. (1982) J. Bacteriol. 149, 469-478 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Ejiri, S.-I., Weissbach, H., and Brot, N. (1980) Anal. Biochem. 102, 393-398 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Fridovich, I. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 7761-7764 [Free Full Text]
  9. Garrett, R. M., and Rajagopalan, K. V. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 272-276 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Habig, W. H., Pabst, M. J., and Jakoby, W. B. (1974) J. Biol. Chem. 249, 7130-7139 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Hellebust, H., Uhlen, M., and Enfors, S.-O. (1989) J. Biotechnol. 12, 275-284
  12. Hilton, J. C., and Rajagopalan, K. V. (1996a) Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1294, 111-114 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Hilton, J. C., and Rajagopalan, K. V. (1996b) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 325, 139-143 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Hemmingsen, S. M., Woolford, C., van der Vies, S. M., Tilly, K., Dennis, D. T., Georgopolus, C. P., Hendrix, R. V., and Ellis, R. J. (1988) Nature 333, 330-334 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Johnson, J. L., Bastian, N. R., and Rajagopalan, K. V. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 3190-3194 [Abstract]
  16. Keresztessy, Z., Huges, J., Kiss, L., and Hughes, M. A. (1996) Biochem. J. 314, 41-47 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Lissolo, T., Pulvin, S., and Thomas, D. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 11725-11729 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. McCormick, D. B., and Roth, J. A. (1970) Anal. Biochem. 34, 226-236 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Mejean, V., Lobbi-Nivol, C., LePelletier, M., Giordano, G., Chippaux, M., and Pascal, M. C. (1994) Mol. Microbiol. 11, 1169-1179 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Mendel, R. F., and Alikulov, Z. (1983) J. Chromatog. 267, 409-413 [CrossRef]
  22. Neame, P. J., and Barber, M. J. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 20894-20901 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Pierson, D. E., and Campbell, A. (1990) J. Bacteriol. 172, 2194-2198 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Pollock, V. V., and Barber, M. J. (1995) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 318, 322-332 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Rahman, M. A., Nelson, H., Weissbach, H., and Brot, N. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 15549-15551 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Rajagopalan, K. V., and Johnson, J. L. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 10199-10202 [Free Full Text]
  27. Satoh, T., and Kurihara, F. N. (1987) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 102, 191-197 [Abstract]
  28. Schindelin, H., Kisker, C., Hilton, J., Rajagopalan, K. V., and Rees, D. C. (1996) Science 272, 1615-1621 [Abstract]
  29. Sherman, M. Y., and Goldberg, A. L. (1991) J. Bacteriol. 173, 7249-7256 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Sherman, M. Y., and Goldberg, A. L. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 71-77 [Abstract]
  31. Smith, D. B., and Johnson, K. S. (1988) Gene (Amst.) 67, 31-40 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Thorneley, R. N. F. (1974) Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 333, 487-496 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Trimboli, A. J., Quinn, G. B., Smith, E. T., and Barber, M. J. (1996) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 331, 117-126 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.