Key Residues in Subsite F Play a Critical Role in the Activity of Pseudomonas fluorescens Subspecies cellulosa Xylanase A Against Xylooligosaccharides but Not Against Highly Polymeric Substrates such as Xylan*

(Received for publication, June 19, 1996, and in revised form, September 25, 1996)

Simon J. Charnock Dagger , Jeremy H. Lakey §, Richard Virden §, Neil Hughes , Michael L. Sinnott par , Geoffery P. Hazlewood **, Richard Pickersgill Dagger Dagger and Harry J. Gilbert Dagger §§

From the Dagger  Department of Biological and Nutritional Sciences, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, the § Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 4HH, the  Department of Chemistry, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, the par  Department of Paper Science, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 88, Sackville St., Manchester M60 1QD, the ** Department of Cellular Physiology, The Babraham Institute, Babraham, Cambridge CB2 4AT, and the Dagger Dagger  Department of Food Macromolecular Science, Institute of Food Research, Earley Gate, Whiteknights Rd., Reading RG6 2EF, United Kingdom

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

In a previous study crystals of Pseudomonas fluorescens subspecies cellulosa xylanase A (XYLA) containing xylopentaose revealed that the terminal nonreducing end glycosidic bond of the oligosaccharide was adjacent to the catalytic residues of the enzyme, suggesting that the xylanase may have an exo-mode of action. However, a cluster of conserved residues in the substrate binding cleft indicated the presence of an additional subsite, designated subsite F. Analysis of the biochemical properties of XYLA revealed that the enzyme was a typical endo-beta 1,4-xylanase, providing support for the existence of subsite F. The three-dimensional structure of four family 10 xylanases, including XYLA, revealed several highly conserved residues that are on the surface of the active site cleft. To investigate the role of some of these residues, appropriate mutations of XYLA were constructed, and the biochemical properties of the mutated enzymes were evaluated. N182A hydrolyzed xylotetraose to approximately equal molar quantities of xylotriose, xylobiose, and xylose, while native XYLA cleaved the substrate to primarily xylobiose. These data suggest that N182 is located at the C site of the enzyme. N126A and K47A were less active against xylan and aryl-beta -glycosides than native XYLA. The potential roles of Asn-126 and Lys-47 in the function of the catalytic residues are discussed. E43A and N44A, which are located in the F subsite of XYLA, retained full activity against xylan but were significantly less active than the native enzyme against oligosaccharides smaller than xyloseptaose. These data suggest that the primary role of the F subsite of XYLA is to prevent small oligosaccharides from forming nonproductive enzyme-substrate complexes.


INTRODUCTION

Xylan, the major hemicellulose in a range of plant cell wall material, comprises a backbone of linked beta 1,4-xylose units which are substituted with acetyl groups and various sugars (1). The xylan backbone is hydrolyzed by endo-beta 1,4-xylanases (xylanases (1)). The primary sequences of over 70 xylanases have now been determined (2). Hydrophobic cluster analysis of these enzymes have shown that they have evolved from two ancestral sequences (2, 3). Thus, xylanases are classified as either glycosyl hydrolase family 10 or glycosyl hydrolase family 11 enzymes (3, 4).

Analysis of the catalytic mechanism of xylanases suggests that they hydrolyze glycosidic bonds via a double displacement general acid-base mechanism (5). Elegant studies by Withers and colleagues (5), using a combination of suicide inhibitors, substrates with different leaving groups and site-directed mutagenesis, have identified the nucleophile and acid-base residues in a family 10 xylanase, designated Cex, from Cellulomonas fimi (6, 7). Cex displays significant activity against aryl-beta -glucosides, soluble cellulose, and xylan (8-9). It is not clear, however, whether other family 10 xylanases display similar activity toward cellulose as Cex or whether the C. fimi enzyme is unusually active against the glucose polymer.

Recently, the three-dimensional structure of four family 10 xylanases have been solved by x-ray crystallography (10-13). The enzymes all consist of 8-fold alpha /beta barrels containing deep active site grooves consistent with their endo-mode of action. However, when xylopentaose was soaked into crystals of an inactive mutant (E246C) of xylanase A (XYLA)1 from Pseudomonas fluorescens subsp. cellulosa, the glycosidic bond linking the terminal nonreducing xylose residue with the rest of the oligosaccharide was adjacent to the enzyme's nucleophile and acid-base residues, suggesting that XYLA was an exo-acting xylanase (10). In contrast, the xylanase also contained residues Glu-43, Asn-44, and Lys-47, which were conserved in all family 10 xylanases, that could constitute a further xylose binding site, designated subsite F, that was not filled by xylopentaose. To establish whether XYLA is an endo-acting glycosidase and to evaluate the importance of conserved residues located at the putative F, E, and C sites of the enzyme, the biochemical properties of the enzyme were evaluated, and the effect, on enzyme activity, of creating E43A, N44A, M46A, K47A, N126A, E127G, N182A, and N182R mutations, was assessed. The data presented in this report demonstrated that the xylanase had an endo-mode of action and provided an insight into the roles of Glu-43, Asn-44, Met-46, Lys-47, Asn-126, and Asn-182 in XYLA.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Bacteria, Plasmids, Phage, and Growth Media

The strains of Escherichia coli used in this study were JM101 (14), JM83 (15), and CJ236 (Bio-Rad). The plasmids and bacteriophage used in this study were pRS16 (16), M13mp19-xynA', which contains the region of xynA encoding the catalytic domain of XYLA cloned into M13mp19 (17), and pUC19 (15). Recombinant E. coli strains were cultured in LB supplemented with 100 µg/ml ampicillin.

Recombinant DNA Technology

DNA was sequenced using the Sequenase version 2.0 kit (Amersham Int.) employing a series of primers that spanned the xynA' gene. Site-directed mutagenesis was carried out according to the method of Kunkel (18). Appropriate mutations were generated by using the following primers to synthesize the DNA in vitro: E43A, CTTCATAATATTTGCGGCAGTGATCTG; N44A, CATCTTCATAATAGCTTCGGCAGTGAT; M46A, GTAGCTCATCTTCGCAATATTTTCGGC; K47A, CATGTAGCTCATCGCCATAATATTTTC; N126A, AAACAGCGCCTCGGCGACCACATCCCA; E127G, ATCAAACAGCGCCCCGTTGACCACATC; N182A, ATTTTCTTCCGTGGCGAAATCGTTGTA; N182R, ATTTTCTTCCGTGCGGAAATCGTTGTA. The mutated nucleotides are in bold. Mutants were identified by sequencing the appropriate regions of xynA'. To ensure that only the desired xynA' mutations had occurred, the complete sequences of xynA' derivatives containing the appropriate mutation were determined. Mutated forms of xynA' were excised from the replicative form of the M13mp19 recombinants by digestion with EcoRV and EcoRI and cloned into EcoRV/EcoRI-restricted pRS16.

Enzyme Purification and Analysis

Native and mutant forms of XYLA were purified to homogeneity from 800 ml of stationary phase cultures as described previously (16). The purity of XYLA was evaluated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (19). The substrates of XYLA used in this study were obtained as follows: oat spelt xylan, carboxymethylcellulose (medium viscosity), cellohexaose, 4-nitrophenyl beta -cellobioside (PNPC), 4-nitrophenyl beta -glucoside (PNPG), 4-nitrophenyl beta -xyloside (PNPX), and xylose were purchased from Sigma. Xylobiose, xylotriose, xylotetraose, xylopentaose, and xylohexaose were obtained from Megazyme. 2,4-Dinitrophenyl beta -cellobioside (2,4DNPC), 2,4-dinitrophenyl beta -xylobioside (DNPX2), and 2,4-dinitrophenyl beta -xyloside (DNPX) were synthesized essentially as described (8, 20, 21, respectively). Enzyme assays using aryl beta -glycosides as substrates were performed in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, at 37 °C. For enzyme assays where xylan or xylooligosaccharides were the substrates, 12 mM citrate, 50 mM PC buffer (12 mM citrate/50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 6.5), pH 6.5, was used. The kinetic constants for aryl beta -glycoside substrates were determined by measuring the rate of release of 4-nitrophenol (PNP) or 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP), as appropriate, spectrophotometrically at 400 nm. The molar extinction coefficients for PNP and DNP were 10,300 and 12,083 M-1 cm-1, respectively. XYLA activity against xylan was determined by measuring the release of reducing sugar as described previously (22). The rate of hydrolysis of the xylooligosaccharides and the identification of the products generated were determined by HPLC analysis as described previously (23). Protein concentration was determined by measuring A280 nm following the method of Stoscheck (24), using a molar extinction coefficient of 58,100 M-1 cm-1.

Pre-steady State Kinetics

Pre-steady state kinetics were performed using stopped flow apparatus (Applied Photophysics model 5x-17MV, used with a 10-mm light path). Briefly, 60 µl of enzyme solution was mixed with with an equal volume of substrate at 25 °C, and the release of the chromophore was monitored from 1 ms to 45 s at 400 nm.

Circular Dichroism (CD) and Fluorescence Spectroscopy

CD spectra were recorded with a Jobin-Yvon CD6 spectropolarimeter. The spectra were obtained at a residue concentration of 5.0 to 5.5 mM in 10 mM Tris/HCl buffer, pH 8.0, at 25 °C using a 0.1-mm path length quartz cuvette (Hellma .121.000 QS). Each spectrum was accumulated from 20 to 30 scans between 190 and 250 nm, at a scan rate of 60 nm/min. Fluorescence spectroscopy was performed using a SLM 8100 spectromotor operating in ratio mode with 8-nm excitation and 4-nm emission bandwidths. Proteins were diluted in 10 mM Tris/HCl buffer, pH 8.0, to a final concentration of 50 µg/ml. Samples were excited at 280 nm, and the emission spectra of the proteins were recorded between 290 and 430 nm at 25 °C. Samples were corrected by subtraction from a buffer blank.


RESULTS

Comparison of the Biochemical Properties of XYLA and Cex

Previous studies have shown that xylanases belonging to glycosyl hydrolase family 10, in addition to hydrolyzing xylan, also cleaved aryl-beta -cellobiosides. Indeed, Cex displays significant activity against PNPC, 2,4DNPC, soluble cellulose, and xylan (9, 25). To evaluate whether other family 10 xylanases also displayed significant activity against cellulosic substrates, we analyzed the biochemical properties of XYLA. The data (not shown) showed that XYLA was >50,000 times less active against soluble cellulose compared with oat spelt xylan. The enzyme exhibited considerably higher activity against and elevated affinity for aryl-beta -xylobiosides and xylosides, compared with the corresponding cellobiosides and glucosides, respectively. XYLA also exhibited far lower affinity for aryl-beta -cellobiosides compared with Cex (Table I).

Table I.

Activity of native XYLA and Cex against aryl beta -glycosides and xylan


Enzyme Substrate Kinetic parameter
kcata Kmb kcat/Km

XYLA PNPC 157 50 3.14
XYLA 2,4DNPC 566 38 14.9
XYLA PNPX 8.8 308 0.03
XYLA 2,4DNPX 1,416 10 141.6
XYLA 2,4DNPX2 3,146 1.0 3,146
XYLA XYLAN 60,137 1.1 54,670
Cexc PNPC 677 0.53 1,278
Cex 2,4DNPC 419 0.06 6,983

a  kcat are in mol of product/mol of enzyme/min.
b  Km values are in mM for the aryl beta -glycosides and mg/ml for xylan.
c  The Cex values are those quoted in Ref. 7.

Family 10 xylanases cleave glycosidic bonds via a double displacement mechanism as depicted in Equation 1.
E+<UP>S</UP> <AR><R><C>k<SUB>1</SUB></C></R><R><C>⇔</C></R><R><C>k<SUB><UP>−</UP>1</SUB></C></R></AR>
 <AR><R><C> </C></R><R><C>E<UP>S</UP></C></R><R><C><UP>+</UP></C></R></AR>
 <AR><R><C>k<SUB>2</SUB></C></R><R><C>⇒</C></R><R><C>P<SUB>1</SUB></C></R></AR>
 EX<AR><R><C>k<SUB>3</SUB></C></R><R><C>⇒</C></R><R><C> </C></R></AR>
 E+<UP>P</UP><SUB>2</SUB> (Eq. 1)
In the first step the glycosidic bond in the substrate is cleaved, and the enzyme is glycosylated (k2) by one of the reaction products. In the second step water attacks the anomeric carbon attached to the nucleophile, Glu-246, with general base-catalytic assistance from the deprotonated carboxylate of the acid-base residue, Glu-127, resulting in deglycosylation (k3) of the enzyme. When Cex hydrolyzes either PNPC or 2,4DNPC, deglycosylation is the rate-limiting step (8). To evaluate the rate-limiting step in the hydrolysis of 2,4DNPC by XYLA, pre-steady state hydrolysis of this molecule by XYLA was analyzed. The data, presented in Fig. 1, showed that there was no pre-steady state burst of DNP release, suggesting that the rate-limiting step in the action of XYLA against this substrate is glycosylation.


Fig. 1. Pre-steady state kinetics of native and the N126A mutant of XYLA against aryl beta -cellobiosides. Wild type and the N126A mutant of XYLA were incubated with 8 mM substrate as described under "Experimental Procedures," and the release of the chromophoric product was monitored at 400 nm using stop-flow apparatus. The traces were as follows: wild type enzyme with 2,4-DNPC (black-triangle); N126A with 2,4DNPC (bullet ); N126A with PNPC (black-square).
[View Larger Version of this Image (14K GIF file)]


The Endo-mode of Action of XYLA

To evaluate the mode of action of XYLA, the products generated by the action of the enzyme against highly polymeric substrates and oligosaccharides were analyzed. The data, presented in Fig. 2, revealed that XYLA displayed typical endo activity against xylan; during the initial stages of hydrolysis a mixture of oligosaccharides was generated. As the reaction continued, the oligosaccharides were progressively degraded yielding primarily xylose, xylobiose, and xylotriose when the reaction was terminated. Similarly, the enzyme also exhibited an endo-mode of activity against oligosaccharides (Fig. 3). For example xylohexaose was cleaved, initially, to mainly xylotriose and small amounts of xylobiose and xylotetraose; xylopentaose to xylobiose and xylotriose; whereas xylotetraose was hydrolyzed, initially, to xylobiose with some xylotriose and xylose. No significant quantities of xylose were generated during the initial stages of hydrolysis of oligosaccharides consisting of four or more xylose units, strongly suggesting that XYLA does not successively release significant quantities of xylose from the nonreducing end of xylopentaose or other oligosaccharides. The relative activities of XYLA against xylotriose, xylotetraose, xylopentaose, and xylohexaose were 1:93:1516:8380, respectively. When the enzyme was incubated with high concentrations of xylotetraose or xylopentaose, initially, oligosaccharides consisting of up to 11 xylose units were generated (Fig. 4) indicating that the enzyme displayed significant transglycosylating activity, consistent with its double displacement mechanism of catalysis. The products generated by XYLA from the oligosaccharides clearly show that XYLA is not an exo-acting enzyme, suggesting that within the crystal structure of XYLA only substrate-binding sites A to E are available to xylopentaose and that there must be at least two xylose binding sites on either side of nucleophile and acid-base residues. Indeed, the relatively high activity of the enzyme against xylohexaose, and the predominant production of xylotriose from this substrate, suggests that there is a minimum of six xylose binding sites.


Fig. 2. HPLC analysis of xylan hydrolysis by XYLA. A, XYLA (3.68 µg/ml) was incubated with 2 mg/ml oat spelt xylan in PC buffer at 37 °C. At regular intervals aliquots were removed, after 0 (1), 5 (2), 10 (3) and 30 min (4), boiled for 5 min, and subjected to HPLC analysis. The position at which xylose (A), xylobiose (B), xylotriose (C), xylotetraose (D), xylopentaose (E), and xylohexaose (F) were eluted from the HPLC column are indicated. B is a graphical presentation of the products generated from xylan hydrolysis by XYLA. The quantity of xylose (square ), xylobiose (open circle ), xylotriose (triangle ), xylotetraose (black-down-triangle ), xylopentaose (bullet ), and xylohexaose (black-square) produced during the course of the reaction is indicated.
[View Larger Version of this Image (17K GIF file)]




Fig. 3. HPLC analysis of xylooligosaccharide hydrolysis by XYLA and its derivatives. Native XYLA was incubated with 0.01 mM of xylotriose (A), xylotetraose (B), xylopentaose (C), and xylohexaose (D) in PC buffer at 37 °C. The concentration of enzyme used was as follows: 110 µg/ml (A), 1.63 µg/ml (B), 100 ng/ml (C), and 20 ng/ml (D). E43A was incubated with 0.01 mM xylotetraose (E) and xylohexaose (F) at enzyme concentrations of 194 µg/ml and 741 ng/ml, respectively. N44A was incubated with 0.01 mM xylotetraose (G) and xylohexaose (H) at enzyme concentrations of 152 µg/ml and 1.27 µg/ml, respectively. N182A was incubated with 0.01 mM xylotetraose (I) and xylohexaose (J) at enzyme concentrations of 4.93 µg/ml and 60.5 ng/ml, respectively. At regular time intervals, aliquots of the reactions were analyzed by HPLC for xylose (square ), xylobiose (open circle ), xylotriose (triangle ), xylotetraose (black-down-triangle ), xylopentaose (bullet ), and xylohexaose (black-square).
[View Larger Versions of these Images (26 + 18K GIF file)]



Fig. 4. HPLC analysis of transglycosylation reactions catalyzed by XYLA. Native XYLA (625 ng/ml) was incubated with 10 mM xylopentaose under the conditions described in Fig. 2, and the products generated were analyzed by HPLC after the reaction had proceeded for 0 min (1) and 10 min (2). The retention time of xylooligosaccharides consisting of 1 (A), 2 (B), 3 (C), 4 (D), 5 (E), 6 (F), 7 (G), 8 (H), 9 (I), 10 (J), and 11 (K) xylose units are indicated.
[View Larger Version of this Image (10K GIF file)]


Modification of Conserved Residues at the F Subsite of XYLA

As stated above, XYLA contains a sixth xylose binding pocket adjacent to site E, which is designated site F. Inspection of the F site revealed residues, Glu-43, Asn-44, and Lys-47, on the surface of the binding pocket, and Met-46 which is located close to the sixth xylose binding region. All four residues are conserved in the family 10 xylanases analyzed to date. To investigate the role of these amino acids in XYLA, site-directed mutagenesis was used to generate E43A, N44A, K47A, and M46A variants of the xylanase. The four mutated forms of XYLA were purified to homogeneity as judged by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (data not shown) and their biochemical properties analyzed. The data (Table II) showed that E43A, N44A, and M46A displayed very similar kinetic properties to native XYLA, when using xylan as the substrate, whereas K47A was significantly less active against the polymeric substrate. Although N44A also exhibited similar activity to native XYLA against all the aryl-beta -glycosides, K47A was less active against PNPC, 2,4DNPC, and 2,4DNPX2 than native XYLA. E43A was less active against PNPC compared with the native enzyme; however, the mutant displayed similar activity to the unmodified xylanase toward the other aryl-beta -glycosides analyzed. M46A was 4-8 times less active than native XYLA against all the aryl-beta -glycosides. E43A, N44A, and K47A were approximately 50-100 times less active against xylotriose, xylotetraose, and xylopentaose, compared with native XYLA, when the wild type and mutant enzymes were matched for xylanase activity, whereas M46A was about 8 times less active than the wild type enzyme, against these substrates (Table III). The pattern of products released from these substrates by the mutants K47A and M46A was similar to wild type XYLA (data not shown), whereas the mode of action of N44A against xylotetraose and xylohexaose and E43A against xylohexaose was distinct from the native xylanase (Fig. 3). N44A generated predominantly xylobiose from xyloteraose, whereas native XYLA produced significantly more xylose and xylotriose from this substrate than the asparagine mutant. Against xylohexaose N44A produced equal molar quantities of xylobiose, xylotriose, and xylotetraose, whereas wild type XYLA released primarily xylotriose. E43A generated a higher proportion of xylotriose from xylohexaose, compared with native XYLA.

Table II.

Activity of mutant forms of XYLA against aryl beta -glycosides and xylan


Enzyme Substrate Kinetic parameter
kcata Kmb kcat/Km

E43A PNPC 4.0 61 0.066
E43A 2,4DNPC 498 44 11.3
E43A XYLAN 40,718 0.9 45,242
N44A PNPC 188 57 3.3
N44A 2,4DNPC 1,063 24 44.3
N44A XYLAN 29,996 0.7 42,851
M46A PNPC 29.2 81 0.36
M46A 2,4DNPC 163.4 43 3.8
M46A XYLAN 61,311 0.7 87,587
K47A PNPC 1.1 100 0.011
K47A 2,4DNPC 48.2 40 1.21
K47A XYLAN 1,188 0.8 1,485
N126A PNPC 2.65 32 0.0828
N126A 2,4DNPC 7.78 0.19 40.9
N126A XYLAN 715 0.3 2,383
E127G PNPC 0.48 0.66 0.727
E127G 2,4DNPC 0.872 0.013 67.1
N182A PNPC 199 51 3.9
N182A XYLAN 76,738 0.5 153,576
N182R PNPC 215 55 3.91
N182R XYLAN 64,780 1.0 64,780

a  kcat values are in mol of product/mol of enzyme/min.
b  Km values are in mM for the aryl-xylooligosaccharides beta -glycosides and mg/ml for xylan.

Table III.

Hydrolysis of xylooligosaccharides by native and mutant forms of XYLA


Enzyme Substratea
X3 X4 X5 X6

Native 1.2  × 10-4 1.1  × 10-2 1.8  × 10-1 1b
E43A 1.5  × 10-6 1.0  × 10-4 1.7  × 10-3 4.0  × 10-2
N44A 2.9  × 10-6 1.9  × 10-4 3.4  × 10-3 3.1  × 10-2
M46A 1.5  × 10-5 8.3  × 10-4 1.5  × 10-2 NDc
K47A 1.9  × 10-6 1.0  × 10-4 1.7  × 10-3 ND
N182A 1.1  × 10-4 4  × 10-3 6  × 10-2 3  × 10-1

a  The substrates used were xylotriose (X3), xylotetraose (X4), xylopentaose (X5), and xylohexaose (X6).
b  The activities of the enzymes were relative to the hydrolysis of xylohexaose by native XYLA. The units of enzyme used were matched against xylan such that they all hydrolyzed xylan at the same rate.
c  ND, not determined.

Modification of Asn-182

Previous studies by Moreau et al. (26) showed that Asn-173 in Streptomyces lividans xylanase A (XYLASL) played an important role in binding xylose units at the B site. The equivalent residue in Pseudomonas XYLA, Asn-182, appeared to be located at the boundary of the enzyme's B and C xylose binding sites. To investigate the importance of this residue at the active site of XYLA, N182R and N182A were created and the biochemical properties of the mutants evaluated. The data, displayed in Tables II and III, showed that neither the N182A nor N182R mutation had a significant effect on the activity of the enzyme against xylotriose or xylan, although there was a modest reduction in the rate at which the mutants hydrolyzed xylotetraose, xylopentaose, and xylohexaose. The initial products generated by the mutants against xylan and the oligosaccharides were similar to native XYLA except for xylotetraose; in contrast to the native xylanase, which generated primarily xylobiose, N182A produced equal molar amounts of xylose, xylobiose, and xylotriose (Fig. 3). These data suggest that Asn-182 does play an important role in substrate binding in XYLA; however, it is also apparent that the conserved asparagine residue does not play an equivalent role in all family 10 xylanases.

Modification of Asn-126 and Glu-127

N126A and E127G mutants of XYLA were constructed and purified to apparent homogeneity. Both mutants were considerably less active than wild type XYLA against all substrates evaluated. Although the Km values of E127G against both PNPC and 2,4DNPC were very low, only against 2,4DNPC was the Km of N126A significantly lower than native XYLA (Tables I and II).

Biophysical Properties of N126A and K47A

As both N126A and K47A displayed significantly lower activity against polymeric substrates, compared to XYLA, circular dichroism (CD) and fluorescence spectroscopy were used to probe the extent to which the mutations had altered the three-dimensional structure of the enzymes. CD spectra of both enzymes were very similar to wild type XYLA (data not shown), suggesting that the two amino acid replacements had not significantly altered the secondary structure of the two proteins. Fluorescence spectroscopy of N126A and K47A showed a shift in the wavelength of maximum emission intensity from 328 nm in the native enzyme to 331 and 326 nm, respectively (Fig. 5).


Fig. 5. Fluorescence spectra of native and mutant forms of XYLA. Fluorescence spectra of native XYLA (--), N126A (- - - -), and K47A (... .) were recorded as described under "Experimental Procedures."
[View Larger Version of this Image (14K GIF file)]


Pre-steady State Kinetics of N126A

The reduction in Km of N126A against 2,4DNPC suggests that the rate-limiting step in the hydrolysis of this substrate by the mutant enzyme is deglycosylation. To evaluate this possibility, the pre-steady state kinetics of this reaction were analyzed using stopped-flow apparatus. The data, presented in Fig. 1, show a rapid burst of 2,4DNP release from the substrate 2,4DNPC which fitted Equation 2:
[<UP>P</UP><SUB>1</SUB>]=A · t ‖ B · (1−e<SUP><UP>−</UP>kt</SUP>) (Eq. 2)
There was little dependence of the steady-state rate (A) on substrate concentration in the range 0.5-5 mM with the apparent Km (0.08 ± 0.01 mM) in agreement with the separately determined value given in Table II. The extrapolated value of the burst amplitude (B), expressed as a fraction of the total protein concentration, was 0.77 ± 0.04, consistent either with k2/k3 = 7.1 or with 77% of the protein being catalytically active if k2 >>>> k3. Analysis of the ratio B/A as a function of substrate concentration gave an estimate of k3·(k2 + k3)/k2 of 0.071 ± 0.004 s-1, in good agreement with the value of 0.06 ± 0.015 s-1 obtained from the plot of the rate constant against substrate concentration. The latter plot was linear, consistent with a Ks 5 mM, and the slope gave a value of kcat/Km of 500 M-1·s-1.

With PNPC, progress curves were linear, with steady-state rate similar to that for 2,4DNPC. The linear progress curve for the wild type enzyme with 2,4DNPC suggests that k2 is rate-limiting. A rapid burst, complete within the dead time of mix-ing, cannot be ruled out, but a Km value lower than 40 mM (Table I) would then be expected.


DISCUSSION

The primary objectives of this study were (i) to evaluate the biochemical properties of XYLA to establish whether there are substantial differences in the biochemical properties of glycosyl hydrolase family 10 enzymes; and (ii) to investigate the role of highly conserved residues in the xylose binding sites C, E, and F of XYLA.

Biochemical Properties of XYLA

Data presented in this paper clearly show that XYLA is an endo-acting xylanase. The relative activity of XYLA against the oligosaccharides indicates that the enzyme exhibits a dramatic increase in affinity for xylotetraose, compared with xylotriose, suggesting that binding of the substrate to two sites either side of the glycosidic bond cleaved plays an important role in enzyme action. In addition, the enzyme was more active against xylohexaose than xylopentaose indicating that XYLA contains at least six xylose binding sites. It can be confirmed, therefore, that occupation of subsites A to E by xylopentaose in the crystal, and not B-F, is a result of contacts between XYLA molecules in the crystals making site F far less accessible to the substrate. The data also indicate that binding of the substrate to site F is essential for efficient hydrolysis by XYLA of xylooligosaccharides and that site E must bind weakly to these substrates. This interpretation of our data is supported by previous studies (27) which showed that subsites adjacent to the site of bond cleavage in xylanases exhibit weak affinity for xylose units. It has been proposed that these sites distort the chair conformation of the xylose sugars and thus assist in the formation of oxocarbonium ion-like transition states prior to the generation of the glycosyl-enzyme intermediate, rather than binding tightly to the substrate (28).

Data presented in this report showed that although the kcat values for Pseudomonas XYLA against both PNPC and 2,4DNPC were similar to Cex, the Km of XYLA against these substrates were 2 and 3 orders of magnitude higher for the respective substrates, compared with the Cellulomonas enzyme. The rate-limiting step of the cleavage of the two aryl-beta -glycosides by XYLA and Cex was glycosylation and deglycosylation, respectively. These data clearly show that there are significant differences in the capacity of cellobiose to bind to the E and F sites of the two xylanases. However, given that the kcat for aryl-beta -cellobioside hydrolysis is similar for Cex and XYLA, it is surprising that in contrast to Cex, the Pseudomonas enzyme displays virtually no activity against polymeric cellulosic substrates even at very high substrate concentrations. It is possible that differences in the two enzymes' activities against cellulose is reflected in the capacity of sites A-D of XYLA and Cex to accommodate glucose molecules. It remains to be established whether Cex or XYLA represents the best paradigm for family 10 xylanases. However, the observation that XYLASL has a Km for PNPC intermediate between XYLA and Cex (29) suggests that family 10 enzymes will exhibit a range of different activities for the aryl beta -glycosides.

Importance of F Site Amino Acids Glu-43, Asn-44, and Lys-47

The location of the highly conserved F site residues Glu-43, Asn-44, and Lys-47 are depicted in Fig. 6. To investigate the role of these residues, they were substituted with alanine, and the biochemical properties of the resultant mutants were analyzed. Against the aryl-beta -cellobiosides N44A displayed the same activity as the native enzyme. This suggests that, although highly conserved, Asn-44 does not play a pivotal role in binding cellobiose in the active site of the enzyme. This is in contrast to the findings of White et al. (30) who suggested that the equivalent residue in Cex forms a H bond with the C-3-OH of the distal glucose of the covalently bound 2-deoxy-2-fluorocellobiose-enzyme intermediate and thus plays an important role in the active site binding of aryl-beta -cellobiosides. The different role of the conserved asparagine could reflect the way cellobiose fits into the active site of Cex and XYLA. It is clear that the two enzymes display very different affinities for cellulosic substrates, and it is possible that in XYLA the C-3-OH of the distal glucose of cellobiose is too distant from Asn-44 to form a H bond.


Fig. 6. View of subsites C, D, E, and F of XYLA. The residues that are the focus of this paper are represented in ball and stick configurations and are appropriately labeled. Glu-43, Asn-44, and Lys-47 are adjacent to each other on the surface of the active site cleft and clearly have the potential to form a xylose binding site. Met-46 is located close to these residues but is not on the surface of the active site. Asn-126 is in close proximity to the acid-base catalyst Glu-127 and thus could play an important role in the function of the catalytic carboxylic acid residue. Trp-83 is positioned between Lys-47 and Asn-126, and thus these two residues could influence the fluorescence of the aromatic amino acid. Asn-182 is also on the surface of the active site cleft and is positioned the appropriate distance away from the two key catalytic residues, Glu-127 and Glu-246, to occupy xylose binding site C of XYLA.
[View Larger Version of this Image (151K GIF file)]


Although E43A displayed similar activity toward 2,4DNPC as native XYLA, the mutant was significantly less active against PNPC than the unmodified enzyme. This could reflect the differences between the leaving groups of the two substrates; 2,4DNP has a pKa of 3.96 (8), and thus at the pH of the assay (7.2) 2,4DNP will function as a good leaving group in the absence of protonation. In contrast PNP has a pKa of 7.18 (8), and thus will only function as a good leaving group if the glycosidic oxygen between PNP and cellobiose in the substrate PNPC is protonated. Once the aryl group has been cleaved the cellobiose-enzyme intermediate generated will be cleaved by a water molecule with general base-catalytic assistance from deprotonated Glu-127. Three possible mechanisms by which E43A influences the protonation of the glycosidic oxygen are as follows. (i) The mutation causes a subtle change in the position of the acid-base residue within XYLA such that the amino acid is not sufficiently close to the glycosidic oxygen to effect protonation. (ii) The mutation influences the environment of Glu-127 such that the residue is not fully protonated. (iii) The E43A modification affects the way cellobiose sits in the active site such that the glycosidic oxygen is not close enough to Glu-127 to be protonated. If mechanisms i or ii are correct, then modification of the position or protonation state of Glu-127 should reduce the rate of the glycosylation step of all substrates, such as xylan, which contain poor leaving groups, and significantly decrease the rate of deglycosylation for all the substrates evaluated. However, the observation that E43A retains full activity against 2,4DNPC and xylan argues against mechanisms i and ii. Support for mechanism iii is provided by White et al. (30) who showed that when 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-beta -cellobiose was covalently linked to the nucleophile of Cex, the Glu-43 equivalent formed a H bond with C-2-OH of the distal saccharide unit. These data suggest that in XYLA Glu-43 forms a H bond with the same OH group of cellobiose. We suggest that disruption of this bond in E43A could change the position of PNPC within the active site, such that the glycosidic oxygen is no longer in close proximity to Glu-127. In contrast, in the glycosylated enzyme the covalent linkage between Glu-246 and C1 of cellobiose positions the anomeric carbon in close proximity to the water molecule that is deprotonated by Glu-127. Thus, the kcat for E43A against 2,4DNPC is similar to native XYLA, as protonation of the leaving group is not essential for deglycosylation to occur. It is unclear, however, precisely what role Glu-43 plays in the hydrolysis of xylan, as removal of this residue does not affect the activity of the enzyme against the polysaccharide. It is possible that xylan forms such strong interactions with other residues within the active site cleft that removal of the C-2-O/E43 interaction does not alter the position of the substrate within the enzyme. This hypothesis is in agreement with Moreau et al. (29), who also demonstrated that a mutation within XYLASL, D124E, had a much greater effect on the affinity of the enzyme for PNPC compared with xylan.

K47A was 18, 51 and 190 times less active against 2,4DNPC, xylan, and PNPC, respectively. These data suggest that Lys-47 plays an important role in positioning the substrate into the active site. The retention, in K47A, of Km values that are similar to native XYLA, against the three substrates, suggests that the mutation is influencing the glycosylation step; if deglycosylation was reduced then the hydrolyzed substrate would accumulate at the active site, causing an apparent increase in the affinity of the enzyme for the substrate. As the enzyme was less active against substrates with moderate (PNPC) and good (2,4DNPC) leaving groups, the mutation is probably affecting the proximity of the anomeric carbon of the sugar at the E site to the nucleophile. This view is supported by the study of White et al. (30) who showed that Lys-47 in Cex formed H bonds with both the ring O and C-3-OH of the distal and proximal glucose molecules of 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-beta -cellobiose, respectively, in the glycosyl-enzyme complex. Removal of these H bonds could significantly alter the position of the substrate at the active site such that the nucleophile, Glu-246, is not in close proximity with the anomeric carbon of the proximal sugar at the E site. However, it is also possible that K47A is having an indirect effect by altering the environment of aromatic residues at the active site of the enzyme. Data in this report showed that the K47A mutation caused a subtle change in the fluorescence spectrum of the enzyme; the 2-nm decrease in lambda max with excitation at 280 nm suggests that one or more tryptophan residues are located in a slightly more hydrophobic environment. A potential candidate is Trp-83, which is only 3.4-Å from Lys-47 (Fig. 6), and thus the removal of the charged nitrogen in the Lys-47 side chain could enhance the hydrophobic environment of Trp-83. This change could alter either the binding of the substrate at the active site or possibly the ionization state of the nucleophile.

Effect of F Site Mutants on Xylan and Xylooligosaccharide Hydrolysis

The observation that E43A, N44A, and K47A were less active against xylooligosaccharides compared with xylan could reflect a reduction in the capacity of the F site, in the three mutants, to bind substrate. The oligosaccharides are thus more prone to forming dead-end complexes by binding randomly to subsites A-D along the cleft. These complexes will block the formation of productive complexes in which the substrate spans sites E and D. In contrast, the highly polymeric structure of xylan ensures that when the polysaccharide binds to sites A-D, adjacent xylose residues fill site E ensuring the formation of an active complex. This interpretation of our data is supported by two reports (26, 27) which demonstrated that in both a family 10 and 11 xylanase, xylose binding sites adjacent to the site of bond cleavage did not bind to the substrate, hence the importance of site F in positioning small substrates into sites D and E of the enzyme.

Importance of Asn-126

Modification of Asn-126 to alanine caused a significant decrease in the catalytic activity of XYLA against all the substrates tested and, against 2,4DNPC, resulted in a large decrease in the Km. Pre-steady state kinetics showed that the rate-limiting step of hydrolysis of 2,4DNPC by N126A was deglycosylation, whereas in the native enzyme glycosylation was the limiting step in the cleavage of 2,4DNPC. These data suggest that N126A is affecting both the efficient protonation of the substrate by Glu-127 and the capacity of this residue to mediate subsequent general base catalysis. Clearly, this is having a greater effect on the glycosylation step of PNPC cleavage, as PNP constitutes a moderate leaving group, whereas protonation of 2,4DNP is not required for XYLA to cleave 2,4DNPC; hence, the decrease in the rate at which this substrate is deglycosylated results in a similar decrease in kcat to PNPC but also an associated reduction in Km as the glycosyl-enzyme intermediate accumulates. It is interesting to note that the complete removal of the acid-base residue in mutant E127G causes a further 10-fold reduction in catalytic activity and switches the rate-limiting step in enzymic action to the deglycosylation step for both PNPC and 2,4DNPC. This suggests that XYLA can cleave substrates with moderate or good leaving groups in the absence of protonation, but the enzyme cannot elicit deglycosylation without the capacity to abstract protons from water. Thus, by inference, the N126A mutation does not completely abolish the capacity of Glu-127 to accept or donate protons, as glycosylation is still the rate-limiting step in PNPC hydrolysis.

An insight into the role of Asn-126 in the function of Glu-127 can be obtained from the study of White et al. (30), who suggested that this residue forms a hydrogen bond with C-2-OH of the proximal glucose moiety of 2-deoxy-2-fluorocellobiose located at the E site. It is possible that this interaction is important in positioning the glycosidic oxygen in close proximity to Glu-127. The role of Asn-126 in the deglycosylation of 2,4DNPC is not so readily apparent. However, Ducros et al. (31) have suggested that Asn-126 is connected to Glu-127 via Gln-203, and it is possible that disruption of the charge transfer by the N126A mutation could influence the protonation state of Glu-127 (Fig. 6). It should also be noted that the N126A mutation causes a 2-nm increase in the lambda max of the fluorescence spectrum of XYLA, suggesting an increase in the exposure of certain aromatic residues to a hydrophilic environment, and this subtle modification to the active site could alter the capacity of Glu-127 to abstract protons from water. Trp-83 is only 3.3-Å from Asn-126 (Fig. 6), and the removal of the methylene component of the Asn-126 side chain could increase the hydrophilic environment of the tryptophan residue.

Importance of Asn-182

Data presented in this report showed that Asn-182, which is on the surface of the active site cleft in the region of the C subsite proximal to the B subsite, and is highly conserved among family 10 xylanases, influences the activity of the enzyme against oligosaccharides larger than xylotriose and shifted the site of xylotetraose cleavage from the middle glycosidic bond to the terminal linkage. This is in contrast to Moreau et al. (26) who showed that a N173D (Asn-173 is equivalent in XYLASL to Asn-182 in XYLA) mutation of XYLASL increased the rate of xylobiose and xylotriose release from xylan, altered the transglycosylation products from, and the site of cleavage of, xylopentaose, but had no effect on the cleavage of xylotetraose. These differences between the Pseudomonas and Streptomyces xylanases suggest that, in XYLA, Asn-182 is playing an important role in ligand binding at the C subsite, whereas in XYLASL Asn-173 is situated in the B subsite. It is interesting to note that modification of residues at the F site of the enzyme causes a more significant decrease in the activity of the enzyme against oligosaccharides than mutations at the C site. This could reflect a higher affinity of site F for its ligand compared with site C. Alternatively, it is possible that the E43A, N44A, and K47A mutations had a bigger influence on the F site than the N182A modification on the C site. These data again highlight the different biochemical properties of family 10 enzymes already observed between XYLA and Cex and show that highly conserved residues do not always play an equivalent role in different xylanases.

Conclusions

Data presented in this study clearly show that XYLA is an endo-acting xylanase that contains a sixth xylose binding site, designated site F, and exhibits considerably lower affinity for cellulosic substrates than Cex. Site-directed mutagenesis studies provided insights into the roles of several residues located in the F, E, and C sites of the xylanase. The data showed that highly conserved residues do not necessarily play equivalent roles in different xylanases from the same family and that disruption of ligand binding at subsite F compromised the enzyme's capacity to hydrolyze xylooligosaccharides but not highly polymeric substrates such as xylan.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported in part by Grant LRG13/138 from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council and the Welcome Trust (to J. H. L. and R. V.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§§   To whom correspondence should be addressed.
1    The abbreviations used are: XYLA, P. fluorescens subsp. cellulosa xylanase A; DNP, 2,4-dinitrophenol; 2,4DNPC, 2,4-dinitrophenyl beta -cellobioside; DNPX2, 2,4-dinitrophenyl beta -xylobioside; DNPX, 2,4-dinitrophenyl beta -xyloside; PNP, 4-nitrophenol; PNPC, 4-nitrophenyl beta -cellobioside; PNPG, 4-nitrophenyl beta -glucoside; PNPX, 4-nitrophenyl beta -xyloside; XYLASL, S. lividans xylanase A; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography.

REFERENCES

  1. Biely, P. (1985) Trends Biotechnol. 3, 286-290
  2. Tomme, P., Warren, R. A. J., and Gilkes, N. R. (1994) Adv. Microb. Physiol. 51, 1-81
  3. Henrissat, B., and Bairoch, A. (1993) Biochem. J. 293, 781-788 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Gilbert, H. J., and Hazlewood, G. P. (1993) J. Gen. Microbiol. 139, 187-194
  5. Withers, S. G. (1995) in Carbohydrate Bioengineering (Petersen, S. B., Svensson, S., and Pedersen, S., eds), pp. 97-113, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam
  6. Tull, D., Withers, S. G., Gilkes, N. R., Kilburn, D. G., Warren, R. A. J., and Aebersold, R. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 15621-15625 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. MacLeod, A. M., Lindhorst, T., Withers, S. G., and Warren, R. A. J. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 6371-6376 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Tull, D., and Withers, S. G. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 6363-6370 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Gilkes, N. R., Langsford, M. L., Kilburn, D. G., Miller, R. C., Jr., and Warren, R. A. J. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 10455-10459 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Harris, G. W., Jenkins, J. A., Connerton, I., Cummings, N., Lo Leggio, L., Scott, M., Hazlewood, G. P., Laurie, J. I., Gilbert, H. J., and Pickersgill, R. W. (1994) Structure 2, 1107-1116 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. White, A., Withers, S. G., Gilkes, N. R., and Rose, D. R. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 12546-12552 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Derewenda, U., Swenson, L., Green, R., Wei, Y., Morosoli, R., Shareck, F., Kluepfel, D., and Derewenda, Z. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 20811-20814 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Dominguez, R., Souchon, H., Spinelli, S., Dauter, Z., Wilson, K., Chauvaux, S., Béguin, P., and Alzari, P. M. (1995) Nat. Struct. Biol. 2, 569-576 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Vieira, J., and Messing, J. (1982) Gene (Amst.) 19, 259-268 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Norrander, J., Kempt, T., and Messing, J. (1983) Gene (Amst.) 26, 101-106 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Hall, J., Hazlewood, G. P., Huskisson, N. S., Durrant, A. J., and Gilbert, H. J. (1989) Mol. Microbiol. 3, 1211-1219 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Pickersgill, R. W., Jenkins, J. A., Scott, M., Connerton, I., Hazlewood, G. P., and Gilbert, H. J. (1993) J. Mol. Biol. 229, 246-248 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Kunkel, T. A. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 488-492 [Abstract]
  19. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Gebler, J., Gilkes, N. R., Claeyssens, M., Wilson, D. B., Béguin, P., Wakarchuk, W. W., Kilburn, D. G., Miller, R. C., Jr., Warren, R. A. J., and Withers, S. G. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 12559-12561 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. 24182419Ballardie, F., Capon, B., Sutherland, J. D. G., Cocker, D., and Sinnott, M. (1973) J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. I, 2418-2419
  22. Miller, G. L. (1959) Anal. Chem. 31, 426-428
  23. Millward-Sadler, S. L., Davidson, K., Hazlewood, G. P., Black, G. W., Gilbert, H. J., and Clarke, J. H. (1995) Biochem. J. 312, 39-48 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Stoscheck, C. M. (1990) Methods Enzymol. 182, 50-68 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Gilkes, N. R., Claeyssens, M., Aebersold, R., Henrissat, B., Meinke, A., Morisson, H. D., Kilburn, D. G., Warren, R. A. J., and Miller, R. C., Jr. (1991) Eur. J. Biochem. 202, 3657-3677
  26. Moreau, A., Shareck, F., Kluepfel, D., and Morosoli, R. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 219, 261-266 [Abstract]
  27. Biely, P., Kratky, Z., and Vrsanska, M. (1981) Eur. J. Biochem. 119, 559-564 [Abstract]
  28. Bray, M. R., and Clarke, A. J. (1995) in Carbohydrate Bioengineering (Petersen, S. B., Svensson, S., and Pedersen, S., eds), pp. 147-165, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam
  29. Moreau, A., Roberge, M., Manin, C., Shareck, F., Kluepfel, D., and Morosoli, R. (1994) Biochem. J. 302, 291-295 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. White, A., Tull, D., Johns, K., Withers, S. G., and Rose, D. R. (1995) Nat. Struct. Biol. 3, 149-154
  31. Ducros, V., Czjzek, M., Belaich, A., Gaudin, C., and Haser, R. (1995) in Carbohydrate Bioengineering (Petersen, S. B., Svensson, S., and Pedersen, S., eds), pp. 239-250, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., Amsterdam

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.