(Received for publication, June 25, 1996, and in revised form, September 6, 1996)
From the Zentrum für Molekulare Biologie, Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 282, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
The homo-oligomeric Hip protein cooperates with
the 70-kDa heat shock cognate Hsc70 in the folding of newly synthesized
polypeptide chains and in the conformational regulation of signaling
molecules known to interact with Hsc70 and Hsp90. In order to further
assess the role of Hip during protein biogenesis, a structure-function analysis of the Hip protein was initiated. By employing the yeast two-hybrid system, the Hsc70-binding site of Hip was mapped to a domain
comprising multiple tetratricopeptide repeats and flanking charged
-helices. Affinity chromatography confirmed direct interaction of
isolated Hip fragments and protein fusions bearing this region with the
ATPase domain of Hsc70 in an ATP- and salt-dependent manner. Contact of Hip with the ATPase domain appears to be mediated primarily by the positively charged
-helix following the
tetratricopeptide repeats. Furthermore, a domain required for
homo-oligomerization was identified at the extreme amino terminus of
Hip.
Molecular chaperones of the 70-kDa Hsps1 play a key role in intracellular protein biogenesis due to their ability to stabilize nonnative protein conformations (1-3). Chaperone activity is achieved through a dynamic cycle of binding and release of the nonnative polypeptide substrate coupled to a cycle of ATP binding and hydrolysis by the chaperone protein. The ATP dependence of the reaction confers the means of extensive regulation through the function of cooperating proteins that influence the nucleotide state of Hsp70 and thus modulate its affinity for polypeptide substrate. In Escherichia coli, cycling of the Hsp70 homologue DnaK is regulated by the DnaJ protein, which promotes the formation of DnaK-substrate complexes by stimulating DnaK's ATPase activity and by the nucleotide exchange factor GrpE required for complex dissociation (4-6). Although the bacterial reaction cycle served for a long time as a paradigm for the regulation of Hsp70 chaperone proteins, the recent identification of the Hsc70-interacting protein Hip reveals a distinct regulatory mechanism in the eukaryotic cytosol (7). Hip directly binds to the ATPase domain of Hsc70 dependent on the activation of the Hsc70 ATPase by the mammalian DnaJ homologue Hsp40 (8, 9). Interaction with Hip stabilizes the ADP-bound state of Hsc70 corresponding to the conformation of Hsc70 that most stably binds polypeptide substrate (10). Apparently, Hsc70 activity in the eukaryotic cytosol is regulated through a Hip-mediated stabilization of chaperone-substrate complexes, in contrast to the GrpE-mediated dissociation characteristic of the prokaryotic reaction cycle (11).
By stabilizing Hsc70-substrate complexes, Hip may provide the molecular basis for an efficient cooperation of Hsc70 with other chaperone systems in the eukaryotic cytosol. For example, Hsc70 cooperates with Hsp90 during the conformational regulation of certain proteins involved in signal transduction such as tyrosine kinases and steroid hormone receptors (12-15). Intriguingly, the human Hip homologue has recently been identified as the 48-kDa component, p48, of steroid receptor-chaperone complexes (16). By presenting the receptor in a conformation that can be recognized by Hsp90, Hip in concert with Hsc70 and a DnaJ homologue appear to mediate early stages of complex assembly (16-20). During the assembly process additional factors such as the Hsp90 partner protein p60, the homologue of yeast Sti1 (21), may promote further cooperation between the chaperone systems (17, 22-24). However, the association of Hip, Hsc70, the DnaJ homologue, and p60 with the receptor-Hsp90 complex is transient. The proteins are not present in the mature complex that confers high affinity hormone binding and that contains as additional components p23 and the immunophilins CyP-40 and FKBP52 (17, 24-26). Apparently, successive conformational changes of the signaling molecule require the concerted action of Hsc70 and Hsp90 as well as their respective co-chaperones.
In the light of their close cooperation, it is intriguing that the homo-oligomeric Hip molecule combines structural elements found in Hsc70 and other Hsc70/Hsp90-associated co-chaperones as well (7). For example, near the amino terminus Hip possesses multiple stretches of a degenerate 34-amino acid motif, so-called TPR repeats (27, 28). TPR repeats are also found in p60/Sti1 and the Hsp90-binding immunophilins CyP-40 and FKBP52 (25, 27, 29). Moreover, several repeats of the tetrapeptide GGMP, previously identified in cytosolic Hsp70 molecules as part of a regulatory motif (30, 31), are located close to the carboxyl terminus of Hip together with an additional p60/Sti1-related region (7). The evolutionary conservation suggests an importance of these domains for Hsc70/Hsp90 regulation and cooperation. A functional characterization of individual domains of the Hip protein was therefore initiated, resulting in the localization of the Hsc70-binding site of Hip and the identification of a domain required for homo-oligomerization. These findings are discussed with respect to the function of Hip in Hsc70/Hsp90-mediated protein biogenesis.
Deletion mutants of Hip were constructed by subcloning
polymerase chain reaction-amplified fragments of the rat hip
gene into pGAD424 (Clontech Laboratories, Inc.). Oligonucleotides used
for amplification contained restriction sites suitable for in-frame subcloning of the hip fragments downstream of the
GAL4 activation domain coding region. All polymerase chain
reaction products were sequenced to confirm wild-type character. The
resultant constructs were introduced into yeast strain HF7c (Clontech
Laboratories, Inc.), and expression of Gal4 activation domain-Hip
fusion proteins was investigated after growth of the corresponding
transformants on synthetic dextrose minimal medium under selective
conditions for 2 days (32). Following SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis of crude yeast extracts, fusion proteins were detected
by immunoblotting using a monoclonal anti-Gal4 activation domain
antibody (Clontech Laboratories, Inc.) and the ECL system (Amersham
Corp.). Solubility of fusion proteins was assessed by disruption of
expressing cells in 20 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.4, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,
0.06% Triton X-100, followed by centrifugation at 5,000 × g for 10 min and a second centrifugation step of the
resultant supernatant fraction at 100,000 × g for 30 min. HF7c cells expressing the chimeric Hip constructs were co-transformed with plasmid GAL4(bd)-Hsc70(1-383) encoding a fusion protein of the ATPase fragment of rat Hsc70 and the Gal4 DNA-binding domain (7). Interaction with the Hsc70 ATPase domain was analyzed as
described previously (7).
To
obtain fusion proteins with the MBP, polymerase chain
reaction-amplified fragments of the hip gene carrying a
translational stop codon at their 3 ends were subcloned into vector
pMAL-c2, which encodes a cytosolic form of MBP based on the bacterial
malE gene (New England Biolabs). In the corresponding fusion
proteins the Hip portion is preceded by a vector-encoded 20-amino acid spacer sequence. pMAL-c2 fusion constructs were transformed into E. coli TG1, and expression of MBP-Hip fusion proteins was
induced by addition of 1 mM
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside. After induction
for 1.5 h at 37 °C, cells were collected and lysed in 20 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.4, 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride using a French pressure
cell, followed by centrifugation at 35,000 × g for 30 min. The supernatant fraction was loaded onto an amylose column for
affinity purification of the MBP-Hip fusion proteins according to the
protocol of the manufacturer (New England Biolabs). As a nontagged
control protein, purified MBP2*, which possesses the 20-amino acid
spacer sequence (designated MBP throughout the text), was commercially
obtained (New England Biolabs).
The wild-type
rat Hip protein, the N-Hip (amino acids 1-256) and the N-Hip (amino
acids 38-256) fragments, and the ATPase domain of bovine Hsc70 were
expressed from corresponding pET plasmids in E. coli BL21
(DE3) cells according to the protocol of the manufacturer (Novagen,
Inc.). Hip, N-Hip, and N
-Hip were purified by ion-exchange and
hydroxylapatite chromatography.2
Purification of the ATPase domain was performed as described (33), and
the domain was immobilized on CNBr-activated Sepharose 4B at 10 mg of
protein/ml of resin as recommended by the manufacturer (Pharmacia
Biotech Inc.). Interaction of Hip, Hip fragments, and MBP-Hip fusion
proteins with the ATPase domain was monitored by incubation of 150 µl
of immobilized ATPase domain with 60 µg of purified protein in 500 µl of Buffer A (20 mM MOPS-KOH, pH 7.2, 50 mM
KCl, 2 mM MgCl2) containing 0.1 mM
ADP. Incubation was performed at 4 °C for 30 min prior to washing
the resin with 15 volumes of Buffer A. Specifically retained protein
was eluted by addition of 1 ml of Buffer A containing 1 mM
ATP and incubation for 10 min at 30 °C followed by addition of 1 ml
of Buffer A containing 250 mM NaCl.
Recombinant DNA techniques were performed as
described (32). Gel filtration was performed using a Superose 12 column
(Pharmacia) equilibrated in 20 mM MOPS-KOH, pH 7.2, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM -mercaptoethanol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10% glycerol. Protein
concentrations were determined using the Bio-Rad Bradford assay reagent
with bovine
-globulin as the standard. Structure analysis was
performed using the DNASTAR program (DNASTAR, Inc.).
To identify structural elements required for
binding of Hip to the ATPase domain of Hsc70, we took advantage of the
yeast two-hybrid system (34). Different domains of the Hip protein were
fused to the activation domain of the transcriptional activator Gal4,
and the chimeric proteins were expressed in yeast strain HF7c in a
soluble form (Fig. 1, A and B).
Strain HF7c co-expressed the ATPase domain of rat Hsc70 (amino acids
1-383) fused to the Gal4 DNA-binding domain (7). Utilizing
HIS3 as a GAL-regulated reporter gene,
interaction of the Hip deletion constructs with the ATPase domain was
monitored following incubation of double transformants on
histidine-free minimal medium. As previously reported, full-length Hip
binds to the ATPase domain of Hsc70, resulting in a His+
phenotype in the two-hybrid assay (Fig. 1C) (7). Similarly, transformants carrying fusions of the Gal4 activation domain to amino
acids 1-257 and 15-368 of Hip formed single-cell colonies on
selective medium. In all cases, growth was dependent on the co-expression of the ATPase domain construct (data not shown). Apparently, interaction with the ATPase domain is mediated by a region
near the amino terminus of Hip (amino acids 15-257) and does not
require the Hsc70- and Sti1-like domains located at the carboxyl
terminus. Transformed cells carrying a construct lacking the three
consecutively arranged TPR repeats (deletion of amino acids 130-215)
did not display a His+ phenotype despite stable expression
of the fusion protein (Fig. 1, TPR). In addition, a
positive growth phenotype was not observed when regions adjacent to the
TPR repeats were deleted. Sequence analysis predicts an extended
-helical conformation for the regions flanking the TPR repeats,
i.e. amino acids 45-112 and 215-256 (Fig.
2). Remarkably, the
-helical segment preceding the
TPR repeats displays an accumulation of negatively charged amino acids (23 residues in the 67-amino acid stretch), resulting in a deduced isoelectric point of 3.8. In contrast, the amino acid 215-256 region
contains predominantly positively charged amino acids (16 residues in
the 41-amino acid stretch, with a deduced isoelectric point of 10.7).
The domain of the Hip protein (amino acids 15-257) shown to mediate
binding to Hsc70 thus contains as major structural elements three
consecutively arranged TPR repeats preceded by an acidic
-helical
segment and followed by a basic
-helix.
The Extreme Amino Terminus of Hip Is Required and Sufficient for Homo-oligomerization of Hip
Based on the results of the
two-hybrid approach, mutant forms of the Hip protein were designed.
Fragments of Hip comprising amino acids 1-256 (N-Hip) and 38-256
(N-Hip) appeared of interest since they should retain Hsc70 binding
capacity but lack other conserved domains. N-Hip and N
-Hip as well as
authentic Hip were stably expressed in E. coli in a soluble
form enabling their rapid and efficient purification (Fig.
3A). The oligomeric state of the purified
proteins was analyzed by gel filtration chromatography on a Superose 12 column. The native molecular mass of Hip was determined to be ~210
kDa and that of the 1-256 N-Hip fragment ~170 kDa (Fig.
3B). Hence, both forms elute at a size much larger than
expected from their deduced molecular mass of 41.3 and 30 kDa,
respectively. Both forms apparently form the homo-oligomeric complex
characteristic for Hip (7). Deletion of the amino-terminal 38 residues
abolished the formation of the characteristic homo-oligomeric structure. This is reflected in the pronounced retention of the 38-256
N
-Hip fragment on the gel filtration column, which elutes 1.74 ml
later than the 1-256 fragment, corresponding to a difference in native
molecular mass of about 140 kDa (Fig. 3B). The extreme amino
terminus of the Hip protein is thus required for subunit interaction
within the Hip homo-oligomer. To test whether the amino terminus is
also sufficient for homo-oligomerization, residues 1-124 of Hip were
fused to the monomeric MBP (Fig. 4A).
MBP-(1-124) was expressed in E. coli in a soluble form and
was affinity-purified on an amylose column. The fusion protein with a
deduced molecular mass of 57 kDa eluted from a Superose 12 column in a
defined peak at 10.00 ml, corresponding to a size of about 300 kDa
(Fig. 4B). The amino terminus of Hip (amino acids 1-124)
apparently induces and mediates homo-oligomerization. Furthermore, the
data exclude an essential role of the TPR repeats for Hip-Hip subunit
interaction since the Hip portion of the fusion protein does not
constitute a complete TPR repeat.
Hip-Hsc70 Interaction Is ATP- and Salt-dependent and Predominantly Mediated by the Positively Charged
The purification of Hip fragments allowed us to
biochemically verify interaction with the ATPase domain of Hsc70
observed in the two-hybrid assay. This appeared essential since Hip is part of a larger chaperone complex in the eukaryotic cytosol comprising several additional proteins apart from Hsc70 (7, 16, 17). Conceivably,
interaction in the two-hybrid system could be mediated by additional
components rather than through direct recognition of the ATPase domain
by Hip. In addition, MBP fusion proteins possessing different portions
of the amino acid 38-256 region of Hip were expressed and purified to
further assess the role of the TPR repeats and the flanking charged
-helices for binding of Hip to the Hsc70 ATPase domain (Fig.
4A).
Purified ATPase domain of bovine Hsc70 was immobilized on activated
Sepharose and incubated with purified Hip, Hip fragments, and MBP-Hip
fusion proteins (Fig. 5). Native Hip and the N-Hip fragment (amino acids 1-256) were quantitatively retained on the Hsc70
ATPase domain column in the presence of MgADP but did not nonspecifically bind to a Sepharose column lacking the domain. Consistent with previous observations demonstrating a reduced affinity
of Hip for Hsc70 in the presence of MgATP (7), both proteins were
partially eluted from the affinity resin by addition of MgATP (Fig. 5).
Protein that remained bound to the resin under this condition was
completely released by subsequent addition of 250 mM NaCl,
revealing the importance of ionic interactions for binding of Hip to
the ATPase domain. Salt-induced dissociation of Hip-containing
chaperone complexes in reticulocyte lysate has in fact been reported
(7, 16). The characteristics observed for binding of purified authentic
Hip and the N-Hip fragment to the immobilized ATPase domain of Hsc70
thus correlate with the characteristics observed for stabilization and
dissociation, respectively, of Hip-containing complexes in cytosolic
extracts. Hence, interaction with the ATPase domain of Hsc70 mediated
by the amino acid 1-256 portion of the Hip protein is apparently the
main determinant for recruitment of Hip to chaperone complexes in the
eukaryotic cytosol.
When the N-Hip fragment (amino acids 38-256) was incubated with the
ATPase domain, the protein was still significantly retained on the
affinity resin compared with the control reaction using ovalbumin (Fig.
5). However, part of the protein was detected in the flow-through and
subsequent wash fractions. The appearance of the fragment in these
fractions may be due to the monomeric character of N
-Hip (Fig.
3B). Addition of MgATP reduced the affinity of N
-Hip for
the ATPase domain, suggesting that the observed retention of N
-Hip
reflects a specific interaction. Furthermore, the 38-256 portion of
Hip mediated significant retention of a corresponding MBP fusion
protein (MBP-(38-256), Fig. 5). The region of Hip comprising the TPR
repeats and the flanking charged
-helices appears to be sufficient
to mediate binding to the Hsc70 ATPase domain. Affinity chromatography
thus confirms the localization of the Hsc70-binding site based on the
two-hybrid approach.
The role of distinct structural elements within the 38-256 region of
Hip was assessed utilizing additional MBP-Hip fusion proteins. The
fusion proteins were expressed in E. coli in a soluble form
(Fig. 4A) and could be affinity-purified on an amylose
column, indicating their correct folding. A fusion construct comprising almost exclusively the negatively charged stretch preceding the TPR
repeats did not interact with the immobilized ATPase domain (MBP-(38-124), Fig. 5). Moreover, only a minor amount of
MBP-(38-218), carrying the negatively charged stretch and the three
consecutively arranged TPR repeats, was retained on the affinity matrix
in an ATP-dependent manner. In contrast, the positively
charged -helical stretch that follows the TPR repeats in the
authentic Hip protein displayed a significant affinity for the
immobilized ATPase domain when fused to MBP (MBP-(216-256), Fig. 5).
The binding behavior of MBP-(216-256) was comparable to that of the
construct comprising the complete Hsc70-binding site (MBP-(38-256))
and was ATP- and salt-dependent. The data suggest that the
ATPase domain is predominantly contacted through the positively charged
-helix following the TPR repeats.
Utilizing the yeast two-hybrid system and an in vitro
affinity assay, we were able to identify the Hsc70-binding site of the eukaryotic co-chaperone Hip. The binding site is located close to the
amino terminus of Hip and apparently comprises three consecutively arranged TPR repeats flanked by an acidic -helical segment and a
basic
-helix (Fig. 6). An involvement of TPR repeats
in protein-protein interactions has previously been demonstrated (27,
28). In the case of Hip, however, the TPR repeats are not sufficient
for binding to the Hsc70 ATPase domain (Figs. 1 and 5). In fact,
contact of Hip with Hsc70 appears mediated primarily by the
-helix
that follows the TPR repeats and displays an accumulation of positively charged residues (amino acids 216-256) (Figs. 2 and 5). The basic
-helix may form ionic interactions with the ATPase domain,
explaining the observed salt sensitivity of Hip-Hsc70 complex formation
(7, 16). A requirement of the TPR repeats of Hip for interaction with
Hsc70 is revealed by the analysis of the
TPR construct in the
two-hybrid approach. Although this construct is stably expressed and
possesses the sequence elements required for homo-oligomerization (amino acids 1-124) and for contacting Hsc70 (amino acids 216-256), interaction with the ATPase domain was not observed (Fig. 1). Therefore, we propose that the TPR repeats are essential for the correct exposure of the basic
-helix within the Hip molecule. Similarly, a role for the structural integrity of the Hsc70-binding site of Hip has to be suggested for the acidic
-helical stretch preceding the TPR repeats since its deletion abolishes interaction in
the two-hybrid assay (Fig. 1), but it does not display an affinity for
the immobilized ATPase domain (Fig. 5).
Intriguingly, the architecture of the Hsc70-binding domain of Hip
largely resembles that of the Hsp90-binding site of CyP-40 and FKBP52
(Fig. 6A) (35, 36). In addition to an amino-terminal peptidylprolyl isomerase domain, these immunophilins possess near their
carboxyl terminus a domain comprising three TPR repeats and flanking
acidic and basic -helical segments. It is noteworthy that FKBP52,
CyP-40, and Hip as well as the Hsp90 partner protein p60/Sti1 belong to
the same subclass of TPR proteins (Fig. 6B) (7, 25, 27). An
essential role of the TPR repeats of the immunophilins for binding to
Hsp90 has been demonstrated (35, 36). As shown for CyP-40, interaction
with Hsp90 requires the participation of the charged flanking regions.
Apparently, domains with similar structural organization of Hip and the
immunophilins mediate binding to Hsc70 and Hsp90, respectively. Despite
a comparable structure, the binding sites are highly specific. FKBP52
does not directly bind to Hsc70 (37), and similarly an interaction of
purified Hip and Hsp90 was not observed.3
The TPR repeats and charged helices thus appear to form a structural framework to expose individual residues conferring specificity. In the
case of Hip, specific interaction is apparently mediated by the basic
-helix following the TPR repeats. It remains to be seen which
structural element within the related region of CyP-40 specifically
contacts Hsp90.
Hip and the immunophilins are components of the Hsc70-Hsp90 chaperone complex in the eukaryotic cytosol that mediates conformational changes, e.g. of steroid receptors and tyrosine kinases during signal transduction (7, 12-15). Yet, both proteins are associated with the complex at different stages of the Hsc70/Hsp90-mediated reaction. Whereas Hip, as a regulator of Hsc70, is involved in the early recognition and binding of substrates by the chaperone complex, the immunophilins interact with the chaperone-substrate complex at a later stage following the release of Hip (17). A chaperone-binding site of similar architecture may have evolved due to structural constraints imposed by Hsc70 and Hsp90 on Hip and the immunophilins within the chaperone complex. Accordingly, Hip and the immunophilins may bind to a common recognition site formed by Hsc70 and Hsp90, forming a specific contact with only one of the chaperone proteins. Such a recognition mechanism would enable the successive binding of different chaperone cofactors without necessarily inducing Hsc70-Hsp90 dissociation.
An important aspect of Hip function may relate to its homo-oligomeric structure. The amino terminus of the Hip protein (amino acids 1-124) is apparently required and sufficient to mediate the interaction of Hip subunits within the homo-oligomeric complex (Figs. 3B and 4B). Remarkably, monomeric Hip fragments retained the capacity to interact with the ATPase domain of Hsc70 (Fig. 5). Hence, homo-oligomerization does not appear to be essential for Hsc70 interaction, and each individual Hip subunit may provide an independent Hsc70-binding site. This is consistent with previous reports demonstrating the binding of at least two Hsc70 molecules per Hip homo-oligomer under in vitro conditions (7). In addition to its Hsc70 regulatory role, Hip may therefore fulfill a scaffolding function by holding multiple Hsc70 molecules in close proximity to an unfolded polypeptide substrate. Cooperative effects may nevertheless occur during the recognition of multiple Hsc70 molecules by the homo-oligomer and would explain the reduced binding affinity of the monomeric forms.
The identification of functional domains of the Hip protein will open new experimental approaches with which to analyze the role of Hip in the regulation of Hsc70 activity. This should contribute to our understanding of how molecular chaperones mediate conformational changes during protein folding and signal transduction in the eukaryotic cytosol.
We thank Petra Schwarzmaier for expert technical assistance and Dave McKay for providing the Hsc70 ATPase domain expression plasmid. Stefan Jentsch and Thomas Langer are acknowledged for critical reading of the manuscript.