The Interleukin-1 Receptor-associated Kinase Is Degraded by Proteasomes following Its Phosphorylation*

(Received for publication, March 25, 1997)

Ting-Ting Yamin and Douglas K. Miller Dagger

From the Department of Inflammation Research, Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, New Jersey 07065

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Following interleukin (IL)-1 stimulation, the majority of the cellular interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK) translocates to a discrete subset of the Type I IL-1 receptor (IL-1R1) in MRC-5 human lung fibroblasts. As the IRAK becomes multiphosphorylated, it is degraded by proteasomes at a rate comparable to that of the degradation of the phosphorylated Ikappa Balpha protein. Proteasome inhibitors block the degradation of phosphorylated IRAK and correspondingly increase the amount of IL-1R1 that can be coimmunoprecipitated with IRAK. The nonspecific kinase inhibitor K-252b blocks IRAK phosphorylation and degradation, but does not inhibit IRAK association with the IL-1R1 indicating that translocation of IRAK to the IL-1R1 and its phosphorylation are independent events. The IL-1 specificity of these effects is indicated by the lack of IRAK phosphorylation and degradation by IL-1 in the presence of the IL-1 receptor antagonist or by the activation of MRC-5 cells by tumor necrosis factor alpha . Long term exposure of MRC-5 cells to IL-1 desensitizes the resynthesized Ikappa Balpha to IL-1, but not to tumor necrosis factor alpha  stimulation, but no additional effects on IRAK are seen.


INTRODUCTION

IL-11 is a master cytokine responsible for the induction of a number of proteins associated with inflammation, such as metalloproteinases, cyclooxygenase, nitric-oxide synthetase, and adhesion proteins (1). Many of these responses are activated by the rapid activation of the transcription factor NF-kappa B following signal transduction by IL-1alpha or IL-1beta bound to the type I IL-1 receptor (IL-1R1) (see Ref. 2 for review). Activation of the IL-1R1 leads to the activation of at least two kinases resulting in the phosphorylation of Ikappa Balpha and the activation of NF-kappa B. Following IL-1 activation, a distinctive Ser/Thr kinase activity binds to and immunoprecipitates with the IL-1R1 (3, 4). This purified IL-1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK) is highly homologous to the Drosophila kinase Pelle but not to other mammalian Ser/Thr kinases, and it has only a limited ability to phosphorylate Ikappa Balpha (5, 6). A second Ser/Thr kinase has been identified that is dependent upon ubiquitinylation for its subsequent phosphorylation of Ikappa Balpha (7). Presumably this latter kinase is activated directly by IRAK or indirectly by as yet unidentified intermediate kinases as well as the TNF receptor associated kinases (see Refs. 8-11). The specific phosphorylation of Ikappa Balpha on Ser-32 and Ser-36 by this ubiquitin-dependent kinase leads to the recognition and destruction of the Ikappa Balpha by proteasomes, which then frees the NF-kappa B to translocate into the nucleus and begin transcription (8, 12-16).

A similar signal transduction sequence has been observed in Drosophila. In Drosophila Toll activates a several-step signal transduction pathway leading to the nuclear localization and activity of the transcription factor Dorsal, which is highly homologous to mammalian NF-kappa B (see Refs. 17 and 18)). The IL-1R1 cytoplasmic domain is homologous to that of the Drosophila receptor Toll, which provides the essential signal for embryo ventralization following fertilization (19-21). These homologous cytoplasmic regions of Toll and the IL-1R1 can be interchanged so that a chimera of the Toll cytoplasmic domain and the IL-1R1 extracellular domain is active when stimulated by IL-1.2 The activity of Dorsal is controlled by the inhibitor protein Cactus, which like its homologous counterpart Ikappa Balpha , is phosphorylated at discreet N-terminal sites, and is then destroyed by proteasomes, freeing Dorsal to migrate to the nucleus and begin transcription (22, 23). Key to the phosphorylation of Cactus in Drosophila is the unique Ser/Thr kinase Pelle, which is activated by its interaction with the membrane bound adapter protein Tube via death domains found on the N terminus of both proteins (24-26). While it appears that Tube recruits Pelle to the Toll receptor following activation, the molecular details of how this recruitment occurs and how Pelle is subsequently activated are currently unclear.

Cao et al. (5) have shown in IL-1R1-transfected HEK cells that IRAK is rapidly translocated to the IL-1R1 and becomes multiphosphorylated following IL-1 stimulation. In the present paper we show that a similar rapid translocation and phosphorylation of IRAK occurs following IL-1, but not TNFalpha , activation of normal human lung fibroblast MRC-5 cells. Following that activation IRAK largely disappears within minutes, and that destruction is prevented by proteasome inhibitors and by K-252b, a nonspecific kinase inhibitor.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

MRC-5 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC CCL-171; Rockville, MD) and were grown in Williams medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (JRH Biosciences, Lenexa, KS). The LLL, IEAL, and LLNV proteasome inhibitors were obtained from Peptides International (Louisville, KY). The PP-2A phosphatase was obtained from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. (Lake Placid, NY). The IL-1alpha , TNFalpha , and soluble IL-1R1 were obtained from R & D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). K-252b was obtained from Alexis Biochemicals (San Diego, CA). The Ikappa Balpha antibody was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). The antibodies to the IL-1R1 and IRAK were raised at Covance Research Products (Denver, PA) against the soluble IL-1R1 and against synthetic peptides of the indicated IRAK sequence (see Fig. 1A). The peptides were prepared at R & D Antibodies (Berkeley, CA) with an N-terminal Cys and coupled to bovine thyroglobulin as described previously (57). IL-1RA was prepared at Merck and shown to prevent the high affinity binding of IL-1alpha and IL-1beta on MRC-5 cells and to prevent the subsequent production of PGE2.3 All other reagents not specifically noted were obtained from Sigma.


Fig. 1. Location and activity of antiIRAK antibodies. A, structure of IRAK showing the location of the death domain with its putative conserved alpha -helical subdomains, the kinase domain with its 11 subdomains and the 15 conserved amino acids, the location of the introns, and the peptide regions used for antibody generation. The peptide I364-388 comprises the activation loop found between subdomains VII and VIII (see text). B, immunoprecipitation of IRAK by the peptide antibodies shown in Fig. 1A and blotted with the I700-712 antisera. MRC-5 cells were stimulated for 0 or 5 min with 10 ng/ml IL-1alpha .
[View Larger Version of this Image (17K GIF file)]

Cell Growth and Sample Preparation

MRC-5 cells were subcultured weekly and for experiments they were grown to confluence in 150-cm2 plates with medium supplemented with penicillin-streptomycin and Mycostatin (Life Technologies, Inc.). One 150-cm2 plate was used for each immunoprecipitation. Prior to use, the medium was replaced with medium with penicillin-streptomycin, but no serum, for 16 h. Inhibitors dissolved in Me2SO at 1000 × final concentration were added 40 min prior to cell stimulation. IL-1alpha or TNFalpha were added for 2-120 min at various concentrations, typically 10 ng/ml. For harvesting, the plates were immediately chilled in an ice tray, washed once with ice-cold PBS, and then scraped in ice-cold PBS containing 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM beta -glycerol phosphate, and 1 mM Na orthovanadate. The cells were centrifuged, and the cell pellet was lysed for 30 min on ice in 300 µl of a buffer (lysis buffer) containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM beta -glycerol phosphate, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10% glycerol, and a protease inhibitor mixture containing 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml pepstatin, and 10 µg/ml leupeptin. The cells were spun for 20 min at 2500 rpm in a Beckman GPR centrifuge, and the supernatant was stored frozen at -80 °C.

Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting

The IRAK and IL-1R1 proteins were immunoprecipitated from the Nonidet P-40-solubilized extract by the addition of 1-3 µl of antibody and incubation at 5 °C for 2-3 h on a rotator. Then 20 µl of a 50% slurry of prewashed protein A-agarose beads was added to each sample, followed by incubation for an additional 1 h at 5 °C. The samples were spun in a microcentrifuge and washed twice in lysis buffer without glycerol or protease inhibitors and then twice in a buffer (kinase buffer) consisting of 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 20 mM MgCl2, 20 mM beta -glycerol phosphate, and 1 mM sodium orthovanadate.

For immunoblotting, the beads were resuspended in 20 µl of 2 × SDS sample buffer, separated on 15-lane, 4-12% SDS Tris/glycine gradient gels (Novex, San Diego, CA) for IRAK or IL-1R1 immunoblots and 10% gels for Ikappa Balpha immunoblots. Transfers were made to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes with blocking, washing, and visualization by ECL techniques as described previously (58). Dilutions used in immunoblotting for the primary antibodies were 1:1000 for IRAK, 1:1000 for Ikappa Balpha , and 1:3000 for the IL-1R1. For the secondary visualization step horseradish peroxidase-protein A (Amersham Life Science, Inc.) was used at a 1:5000 dilution. Exposures were made from 5 s to 15 min. Films were scanned with a Quantity One densitometry system (PDI, Huntington Station, NY).

For multiple immunoblots on the same samples, the membranes were stripped immediately following the immunoblotting. To strip the membranes, they were washed four times with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBS/Tween) and incubated for 30 min at 50 °C in a buffer containing 62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 2% SDS, and 100 mM 2-mercaptoethanol. The stripped membranes were then washed 6 times with PBS/Tween and immunoblotted for the next antibody. Each membrane was blotted for a maximum of three times.

Kinase Assay

Protein A beads containing IRAK or IL-1R1 immunoprecipitated protein washed in kinase buffer were incubated in a 20-µl assay containing 2 µM ATP and 10 µCi of [33P]PO4 (Amersham) for 30 min at 30 °C. The samples were heated with 20 µl of 2 × SDS sample buffer, separated on 4-12% gels, blotted to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, and exposed overnight to Kodak X-OMAT film. The samples were then immunoblotted as described above.

Phosphatase Assay

Immunoprecipitated IRAK-agarose beads were washed twice in a buffer consisting of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, 0.1 mM CaCl2, and 2 mM NiCl2. In a 20-µl assay with the same buffer 0.5 unit of PP-2A was added, the samples were incubated 30 min, 37 °C, and then 20 µl of 2 × SDS sample buffer was added, followed by heating, and separation on SDS 4-12% gels.


RESULTS

IRAK Is Phosphorylated and then Disappears from MRC-5 Cells

IRAK is a multidomain protein containing an N-terminal death domain, a kinase domain, and an undetermined C-terminal domain, which is absent in Pelle (Fig. 1A). In this diagram the putative IRAK death domain homologous to that of Pelle is shown with the six-core alpha -helices (see Refs. 27 and 28), and the locations of the kinase subdomains are shown together with the locations of the 15 conserved kinase residues (5, 29). The locations of the introns are depicted by inverted triangles, based upon the sequence of the human gene within Xq28 as reported in GenBankTM (accession number U52112, deposited by M. Platzer, D. Bauer, and B. Drescher). Those peptide regions used for the generation of polyclonal antipeptide IRAK antibodies in the present report are indicated with a bar. All three antisera immunoprecipitated a common protein band in unstimulated MRC-5 cells (Fig. 1B). When the MRC-5 cells were activated with IL-1alpha , this sharp IRAK band disappeared and a diffuse higher molecular weight band was formed as detected with the I700-712 antisera (Fig. 1B), analogous to the migration of the phosphorylated IRAK reported earlier (5) (see below). A similar pattern was seen when the I504/523 and I364/388 antisera were used for immunoblotting, but the antisera had substantially weaker immunoblotting activity (data not shown). No new immunodetectable IRAK protein fragments were detected in the IL-1alpha stimulated cells coincident with the disappearance of the IRAK protein band (data not shown).

A detailed time course of IL-1alpha activation of the MRC-5 cells was performed, and the amount of IRAK associated with the IL-1R1 was observed by immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting with the corresponding antisera (Fig. 2A) In the absence of IL-1alpha stimulation, no IRAK was found associated with the IL-1R1. Within 30 s a small amount of IRAK was associated with the IL-1R1, and this small amount of IRAK migrated at about the same or at just a slightly slower rate as the unmodified IRAK observed in the IRAK intraperitoneal (Fig. 2A). This association of IRAK with the IL-1R1 was specific for IL-1 activation, because it was blocked by a 1000-fold higher concentration (10 µg/ml) of the IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA (30); see Fig. 2B). Furthermore, the IL-1R1/IRAK association was not induced when the MRC-5 cells were stimulated with TNFalpha (see below).


Fig. 2. Phosphorylation and disappearance of IRAK and its association with the IL-1R1. A, time course (0-10 min) of 10 ng/ml IL-1alpha stimulation of MRC-5 cells immunoprecipitated by IRAK (I700-712) or IL-1R1 antibodies and blotted by antibodies from the same immunogen but raised in different rabbits. "Extract" denotes a blot of the Nonidet P-40 dissolved cell extract before the immunoprecipitation. "sR" is a 1-ng standard of the recombinant soluble receptor. "Short Expos." refers to a shorter ECL exposure of the sR, and the 0- and 2-min immunoprecipitation by the IL-1R1 antibody. B, inhibition by IL-1RA of IL-1alpha activation of MRC-5 cells. A 1000-fold excess (10 µg/ml) of IL-1RA was mixed with the 10 ng/ml IL-1alpha prior to its addition to MRC-5 cells, the cells were incubated for up 20 min 37 °C, and the IRAK and its associated IL-1R1 were immunoprecipitated with the I700-712 antibody and blotted with a second IRAK and an IL-1R1 antibody. C, labeling of IRAK in a [33P]PO4 kinase assay. MRC-5 cells stimulated for the indicated time were solubilized, and the IRAK was immunoprecipitated with the I700-712 IRAK or IL-1R1 antibodies, incubated for 30 min, 30 °C, in a kinase assay, separated on SDS gels, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, and exposed by autoradiography. The same membrane was immunoblotted with a second I700-712 antibody. D, MRC-5 cells stimulated for 0 or 3 min with 10 ng/ml IL-1alpha were immunoprecipitated with a I700-712 IRAK antibody, the immunoprecipitates were washed in a phosphatase buffer (see "Experimental Procedures"), and one set was incubated with PP-2A phosphatase and one set was incubated in the absence of PP-2A. E, density of the IRAK immunoblotted samples in part A determined by scanning of the ECL exposures. Top panel, density obtained of the nonphosphorylated IRAK region (bullet ) and the phosphorylated IRAK region (black-triangle) using the IRAK antibody immunoprecipitated samples, and the phosphorylated IRAK region by the IL-1R1 immunoprecipitated sample (triangle ). Bottom panel, rate of phosphorylation of IRAK normalized for the degradation of IRAK. The percentage of the total IRAK immunoprecipitated that was phosphorylated was determined in the samples that had been immunoprecipitated by the IRAK (black-triangle) or IL-1R1 (triangle ) antibodies (data from E, top panel).
[View Larger Version of this Image (47K GIF file)]

The diffuse bands of IRAK observed immediately after IL-1 activation were due to phosphorylation of IRAK; in an in vitro [33P]PO4 kinase assay of IRAK immunoprecipitated from MRC-5 cells before and after IL-1 activation, the same immunoblottable diffuse IRAK bands could be labeled with [33P]PO4, whereas the faster migrating IRAK band found in the unstimulated cells was not labeled with [33P]PO4 (Fig. 2C). Multiple phosphorylations of the IRAK were observed in a time-dependent fashion with an increased phosphorylation observed at later times (Fig. 2A, 4- and 10-min time points versus 0.5 min) leading to a preponderance of the slowest migrating, most heavily phosphorylated forms at later times (see Fig. 2C; cf. Ref. 5). This conversion of IRAK to a phosphorylated form was not observed in the MRC-5 cells in which IL-1RA blocked the IL-1 activation (Fig. 2B). All of the observed phosphorylations on IRAK were on Ser and Thr residues; the elution of all the phosphorylated IRAK protein could be shifted to the more rapid rate observed with the unphosphorylated IRAK following treatment with the Ser/Thr-specific phosphatase PP-2A (Fig. 2D; see Ref. 31).

Scans of the the immunoblots showed that following a short lag the unphosphorylated IRAK disappeared with a t1/2 of about 2 min (bold line, Fig. 2E, top). This decrease probably reflected the conversion of unphosphorylated IRAK to the phosphorylated state, because it was reversed by phosphatase treatment (Fig. 2D). The amount of phosphorylated IRAK reached a maximum amount before 2 min and then began to rapidly decline (Fig. 2E, top panel). This pattern of the phosphorylated IRAK was observed regardless of whether the IRAK was detected by immunoprecipitation with an IRAK or an IL-1R1 antibody (Fig. 2E, top panel). If the amount of phosphorylated IRAK were normalized to that of the total IRAK detected to correct for the disappearance of IRAK, then maximal phosphorylation occurred later between 2 and 4 min (Fig. 2E, bottom). Hence, IRAK began to disappear as it was phosphorylated, so that the maximal amount of phosphorylated IRAK detected was a balance of the formation of phosphorylated IRAK and its degradation. The loss of IRAK observed within the Nonidet P-40-solubilized MRC-5 cells was not due to the translocation of IRAK to a detergent insoluble nuclear pellet, because immunochemical analysis of the detergent-insoluble pellets also showed the absence of IRAK (data not shown).

In contrast to the rapid disappearance of IRAK following IL-1 activation, the MRC-5 cell IL-1R1 is neither phosphorylated nor diminished in total amount (data not shown). If anything, the total amount of IL-1R1 that can be immunoprecipitated by IL-1R1 antibodies following IL-1 stimulation increases in amount during stimulation (see Fig. 2A, short exposure). The IL-1R1 seen by straight immunoblot or after immunoprecipitation of MRC-5 cell extracts by IL-1R1 consists of primarily two hazy bands. The same pattern is also found in the soluble IL-1R1 standard (missing the cytoplasmic tail and transmembrane region) that is expressed in mammalian cells (Fig. 2A). This heterogeneity is most likely a result of variable glycosylation on the IL-1R1, which is known to have multiple glycosylation sites producing receptors with 23-35% total carbohydrate (32). The IL-1R1 coimmunoprecipitated with IRAK comprises roughly 2% of the total IL-1R1 in the MRC-5 cells that can be immunoprecipitated by the IL-1R1. The form of the IL-1R1 associated with IRAK is principally that form that migrates the most slowly, perhaps with the largest amount of carbohydrate (Fig. 2A).

To compare the effects of IL-1 on IRAK activation and disappearance to that of that of the subsequently activated Ikappa Balpha , aliquots of the IL-1alpha -activated samples (Fig. 2A) were immunoblotted with an antibody specific for Ikappa Balpha . The results showed that the Ikappa Balpha , like IRAK, was likewise phosphorylated by 1-2 min, and at the same time it largely disappeared from the cells by 10 min (Fig. 3, top panel). Comparison of the total amount of Ikappa Balpha to the total amount of IRAK as detected by scans of immunoblots indicated that the t1/2 of disappearance of both proteins was about 4 min (Fig. 3, bottom panel). Hence, the disappearance from cells of both IRAK and Ikappa Balpha occurred rapidly and in a parallel fashion following their phosphorylation.


Fig. 3. Phosphorylation and degradation of Ikappa Balpha in MRC-5 cells following IL-1 activation. Top, immunoblot by the Ikappa Balpha antibody of the solubilized IL-1alpha -activated samples prior to immunoprecipitation. Bottom, plot of the disappearance of IRAK and Ikappa Balpha as indicated by the density of the Ikappa Balpha (black-square, from scanned gel at top) or the total amount of IRAK detected following immunoprecipitation by the IRAK (open circle ) or IL-1R1 (triangle ) antibodies (from Fig. 2E, top) normalized to the maximal amount of absorption detected in the blotted samples.
[View Larger Version of this Image (30K GIF file)]

IRAK Phosphorylation Does Not Occur following TNFalpha Activation of MRC-5 Cells

MRC-5 cells activated for 5 min with a dose response of IL-1 produced a graded response of IRAK activation, as measured by the formation of the phosphorylated band and the association with the IL-1R1, as well as a graded disappearance of IRAK (Fig. 4, top and middle panels). A comparable extent of Ikappa Balpha phosphorylation and degradation in the same cells was observed (Fig. 4, bottom panel). In contrast, TNFalpha activation performed on a parallel series of plates showed that while the MRC-5 cells were activated as measured by the phosphorylation and degradation of Ikappa Balpha (Fig. 4, bottom panel), there was no effect on either the phosphorylation or the degradation of IRAK (Fig. 4, top panel). Similarly in the TNFalpha stimulated cells, there was no association of IRAK with the IL-1R1 (Fig. 4, middle panel). Hence, as was noted earlier using IL-1RA (Fig. 2B), the stimulus that induces IRAK association with the IL-1R1 and IRAK phosphorylation is specific for IL-1 stimulation and is not a result of an activated MRC-5 state.


Fig. 4. Effects of TNFalpha and a dose response of IL-1alpha on the phosphorylation and disappearance of IRAK and Ikappa Balpha and the association of the IL-1R1 with IRAK. MRC-5 cells stimulated with either serial dilutions of IL-1alpha (the indicated concentrations in ng/ml) or 20 ng/ml TNFalpha for 0, 5, or 20 min were immunoprecipitated with either the I700-712 IRAK or IL-1R1 antibodies and blotted with a different I700-712 antibody (top panel) or an IL-1R1 antibody (middle panel). Extracts of the cells prior to immunoprecipitation were blotted with the Ikappa Balpha antibody (bottom panel).
[View Larger Version of this Image (36K GIF file)]

Proteasome Inhibitors Prevent IRAK Disappearance

The addition to activated cells of various inhibitors of proteasome activity have enabled the accumulation of phosphorylated Ikappa Balpha and have prevented its degradation. When effective concentrations of the peptide aldehyde inhibitors Cbz-Leu-Leu-Leu-H (LLL, 25 µM (33)), Cbz-Ile-Glu(O-t-butyl)-Ala-leucinal (IEAL, 60 µM (34)), or Cbz-Leu-Leu-norVal-H (LLNV, 50 µM (35)) were added to MRC-5 cells stimulated by IL-1alpha , Ikappa Balpha was retained for up to 40 min (Fig. 5A, bottom panel). The destruction of IRAK within the same cells is similarly inhibited: proteasome inhibitors lead to a retention of the phosphorylated form of IRAK (Fig. 5A, top panel). The effects of the proteasome inhibitors did not prevent the disappearance of the majority of the nonphosphorylated IRAK (Fig. 5B, top panel), but rather prevented the loss of the phosphorylated IRAK (Fig. 5B, bottom panel). Comparison of changes in the total amount of IRAK in the cells to that of Ikappa Balpha showed that the proteasome inhibitors had a similar effect quantitatively on the retention of both proteins following IL-1alpha stimulation (Fig. 5C).


Fig. 5. Effect of proteasome inhibitors on the phosphorylation and disappearance of IRAK and Ikappa Balpha and the association of the IL-1R1 with IRAK following IL-1alpha activation of MRC-5 cells. A, MRC-5 cells were stimulated with 10 ng/ml IL-1alpha for 2-40 min in the absence (-) or presence of 25 µM LLL, 60 µM IEAL, or 50,µM LLNV (see "Experimental Procedures") and then solubilized and immunoprecipitated with the I700-712 IRAK antibody. Immunoblotting was performed on the immunoprecipitates with a separate I700-712 IRAK (top panel) or an IL-1R1 antibody (middle panel). Nonimmunoprecipitated cell extracts were also blotted with the Ikappa Balpha antibody (bottom panel). B, top panel, plot of the scanned immunoblots of the unphosphorylated IRAK from part A, top panel. Bottom panel, plot of the scanned immunoblots of the phosphorylated IRAK from part A. C, top panel, plot of the total scanned phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated IRAK density (sum of results of part B). Bottom panel, plot of the total Ikappa Balpha density as determined by scans of part A, bottom panel. D, plot of the total amount of IL-1R1 associated with IRAK as determined by scans of part A, middle panel.
[View Larger Version of this Image (54K GIF file)]

Just as the proteasome inhibitors prevented IRAK destruction, they also increased the amount of IL-1R1 found associated with IRAK immunoprecipitates (Fig. 5D). The amount of the IRAK associated IL-1R1 doubled to a level of about 4% of the total immunoprecipitable receptor, but the type of IL-1R1 associating with IRAK (slower migrating form in SDS gels) remained the same. The total amount of IL-1R1 immunoprecipitated by the IL-1R1 antibody over the 40-min incubation period was not significantly changed, indicating that proteasome activity had no effects on IL-1R1 levels during IL-1 stimulation (data not shown).

IRAK Degradation Is Inhibited by the Kinase Inhibitor K-252b

The observation that it is the phosphorylated form of IRAK that is degraded by proteasomes (Fig. 5B) led to the prediction that an inhibitor of IRAK phosphorylation should prevent the degradation of IRAK. Because staurosporine analogs are known to be nonspecific inhibitors of a number of cellular kinases (36, 37), the effect of K-252b on IRAK phosphorylation and degradation was determined in IL-1alpha -stimulated MRC-5 cells. The formation of phosphorylated IRAK (as determined by the band shift on SDS gels) particularly in cells treated with 25 µM K-252b was delayed relative to the control, and at the same time the disappearance of IRAK was inhibited (Fig. 6, top panel). The association of IRAK with the IL-1R1 was, however, not inhibited by K-252b; in fact, the inhibited cells showed a greater amount of IL-1R1 associated with IRAK following activation (Fig. 6, middle panel) similarly to what was observed when the degradation of IRAK was inhibited by proteasome inhibitors (Fig. 5). Despite the effects on IRAK, only modest effects were seen in the inhibition of Ikappa Balpha degradation (Fig. 6, bottom panel). This suggests that K-252b differentially inhibits the kinase activity that results in IRAK hyperphosphorylation from that kinase activity producing Ikappa Balpha phosphorylation.


Fig. 6. Effect of K-252b on the phosphorylation and disappearance of IRAK and Ikappa Balpha and the association of the IL-1R1 with IRAK following IL-1alpha activation of MRC-5 cells. Cells preincubated with 10 or 25 µM K-252b or a Me2SO control (-) were stimulated with 10 ng/ml IL-1alpha for 0-20 min and immunoprecipitated with an I700-712 IRAK antibody. Immunoblotting was performed on the immunoprecipitates with a separate I700-712 IRAK (top panel) or an IL-1R1 antibody (middle panel). Nonimmunoprecipitated cell extracts were also blotted with the Ikappa Balpha antibody (bottom panel).
[View Larger Version of this Image (38K GIF file)]

Unstimulated Ikappa Balpha , but Not IRAK, Is Regenerated during Prolonged IL-1 Stimulation

Previously it had been observed that prolonged IL-1 or TNFalpha incubation with sensitive cells first led to the degradation of Ikappa Balpha , followed by its resynthesis and return within 60 min (8, 38). To compare the corresponding effects of continuous IL-1 administration on the presence of IRAK to that of Ikappa Balpha , MRC-5 cells were incubated for up to 2 h with IL-1alpha . As is shown in Fig. 7 during prolonged exposure of IL-1, cellular Ikappa Balpha was quickly lost, but returned to almost normal levels within 60 min (Fig. 7A, bottom panel; Fig. 7B, middle panel). If the proteasome inhibitor LLL were present, the initial loss of Ikappa Balpha was delayed, and a considerable amount of the Ikappa Balpha was retained as the phosphorylated Ikappa Balpha (Fig. 7A, bottom panel). The resynthesized Ikappa Balpha , however, was nonphosphorylated as seen by the absence of the phosphorylated Ikappa Balpha band with LLL at 60 and 120 min (Fig. 7A, bottom panel). That the newly synthesized Ikappa Balpha was unstimulated was seen by the subsequent addition of TNFalpha to dishes of MRC-5 cells that had been continuously stimulated for 105 min with IL-1alpha . After 15 min of TNFalpha exposure the newly synthesized Ikappa Balpha disappeared unless LLL was present in the incubation, at which point much of the Ikappa Balpha was present as the phosphorylated form (Fig. 7A, bottom right set of panels). In contrast, the readdition of more IL-1alpha had no effect on the phosphorylation or disappearance of Ikappa Balpha , indicating that the cells were down-regulated with respect to IL-1-mediated activity.


Fig. 7. Degradation and resynthesis of Ikappa Balpha after continuous IL-1 stimulation and down-regulation of the IL-1 response. A, MRC-5 cells were stimulated with 10 ng/ml IL-1alpha for 2-120 min in the absence (-) or presence (+) of 25 µM LLL and then solubilized and immunoprecipitated with an I700-712 IRAK antibody. A duplicate series of plates treated for 105 min with 10 ng/ml IL-1alpha in the presence or absence of LLL were given either an additional dose of 10 ng/ml IL-1alpha or 10 ng/ml TNFalpha and then incubated for an additional 15 min before immunoprecipitation (right series of panels). Immunoblotting was performed on the immunoprecipitates with a separate I700-712 IRAK (top panel) or an IL-1R1 antibody (middle panel). Nonimmunoprecipitated cell extracts were also blotted with the Ikappa Balpha antibody (bottom panel). B, plots of absorbance of the scanned immunoblotted samples of IRAK (part A, top panel), Ikappa Balpha (middle panel), or IL-1R1 (bottom panel) antibodies in the absence of LLL (solid symbols) and presence of LLL (open symbols). Results are the means of two experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (24K GIF file)]

The long term effects of the IL-1 treatment on IRAK in the MRC-5 cells were much less dramatic than those of Ikappa Balpha . While most of the IRAK was phosphorylated and removed by 12-30 min, a small amount of both phosphorylated and unphosphorylated IRAK persisted for as long as 120 min (Fig. 7, A and B, top panels). Addition of LLL in the incubation increased the amount of phosphorylated IRAK, but had no effect on the unphosphorylated IRAK (Fig. 7A, top panel). It thus appeared that there was a continuous production of a newly synthesized pool of IRAK that became phosphorylated and subsequently degraded unless inhibited by the presence of LLL. IL-1R1 levels associated with IRAK gradually declined after 12-60 min unless LLL was present (Fig. 7A, middle panel; Fig. 7B, bottom panel; compare with Fig. 7B, top panel). As expected from the prior presence of IL-1 with these cells and the lack of effects of TNFalpha on IRAK, analysis of the IRAK in the cells that had received additional TNFalpha or IL-1alpha at 105 min showed no difference from the cells that had continuous IL-1alpha exposure (Fig. 7A, top right set of panels).


DISCUSSION

In the present report we confirm in a normal human fibroblast line the previous observations in IL-1R1-transfected HEK cells that IRAK associates with the IL-1R1 and becomes phosphorylated after IL-1 stimulation (5). We now find that following its phosphorylation IRAK becomes a target for cellular proteolysis by proteasomes in a similar manner to that seen previously with the phosphorylation and subsequent proteasome destruction of Ikappa Balpha . IRAK phosphorylation and its destruction is specific for activation of the IL-1R1: prevention of IL-1R1 activation by the specific IL-1 receptor antagonist IL-1RA or independent cellular and Ikappa Balpha activation by other stimulators such as TNFalpha have no effect on the phosphorylation and destruction of IRAK. Inhibition of IRAK phosphorylation, like inhibition of proteasome activity, does not, however, prevent association of IRAK with the IL-1R1, indicating that translocation of IRAK to the IL-1R1 occurs prior to or independently of IRAK phosphorylation. The low phosphorylation state of IRAK observed when it initially translocates to the IL-1R1 (see Fig. 2A and Ref. 5) suggests that the phosphorylation of IRAK occurs subsequent to its translocation. Either it is the association of IRAK with the IL-1R1 perhaps together with the IL-1 accessory protein (see Ref. 3) that activates IRAK producing its autophosphorylation, or there is present another kinase that cotranslocates to the same IL-1R1·IRAK complexes that can phosphorylate IRAK in a K-252b-inhibitable fashion.

The model for IRAK behavior following IL-1 activation is diagrammed in Fig. 8. In the unstimulated cell state (Fig. 8A) IRAK is a presumably cytoplasmic inactive kinase (4) that is not associated with the IL-1R1. The IL-1R1 itself exists on the membrane as a mixture of receptors of differing glycosylation state (32). In Fig. 8A the IL-1R1 is depicted as containing either five or two glycosylation chains, although the exact molecular differences between these forms are unknown. When IL-1 occupies the IL-1R1, IRAK translocates to the most highly glycosylated form of the IL-1R1 (Fig. 8B), where it is also found associated with the IL-1 accessory protein (data not shown). As IRAK becomes associated with the IL-1R1, it becomes increasingly phosphorylated and simultaneously activated (4). Because roughly three fuzzy bands can be seen following activation (Fig. 2A and Ref. 5), IRAK is depicted with three phosphates attached, although exactly how many residues are phosphorylated, and to what extent, is not known. Based upon the conservation of sequence of IRAK with the Drosophila Pelle kinase (5) and its known requirement for its N-terminal death domain for activation (25, 26), we assume that it is this domain of IRAK that is responsible for its association with the cytoplasmic domain of the IL-1R1.


Fig. 8. Model for the phosphorylation and degradation of IRAK and Ikappa Balpha in MRC-5 cells following activation by IL-1 and/or TNFalpha . A, in the absence of stimulation, IRAK is unphosphorylated and separate from the IL-1R1, which is depicted on cells in a lower and a higher glycosylation state. B, following IL-1 stimulation the majority of the IRAK translocates to a fraction of the IL-1R1 with a higher glycosylation state where it becomes phosphorylated. The now activated IRAK can activate a downstream ubiquitin-dependent kinase which phosphorylates Ikappa Balpha . The phosphorylation of both IRAK and the Ikappa Balpha results in their degradation by proteosomes. NF-kappa B once freed of its inhibitor Ikappa Balpha , translocates to the nucleus where it can begin transcription. TNFalpha through its receptor can also activate the kinase-phosphorylating Ikappa Balpha independently of IL-1, in which case there is no activation of IRAK, no association with the IL-1R1, no phosphorylation, and no degradation of IRAK. C, following continuous IL-1 exposure for up to 2 h, the majority of IRAK has disappeared, but a small amount of activated IRAK remains associated with the IL-1R1 as seen by its coimmunoprecipitation. A small amount of unphosphorylated IRAK remains unassociated with the IL-1R1. Ikappa Balpha is resynthesized by ~60 min and is insensitive to further IL-1 activation, but it is sensitive to TNFalpha -induced phosphorylation and degradation.
[View Larger Version of this Image (30K GIF file)]

Both IL-1 and TNFalpha stimulate a ubiquitin-dependent kinase that is responsible for the phosphorylation of Ikappa Balpha (7). Presumably this Ikappa Balpha -kinase is activated directly or indirectly through unknown intermediary kinases by IRAK as well as by kinases associated with the TNFalpha Type I (10, 11) and/or Type II receptors (9, 40). The resultant Ikappa Balpha phosphorylation tags Ikappa Balpha for its subsequent destruction by proteasomes (8, 13-15, 41) and enables the subsequent activation and nuclear translocation of NF-kB (see Ref. 42). The phosphorylated IRAK is also largely destroyed by proteasome activity at a rate comparable with that of Ikappa Balpha . Degradation of both IRAK and Ikappa Balpha is retarded by proteasome inhibitors, but proteasome inhibitors do not prevent the association of IRAK with the IL-1R1 nor the subsequent conversion of the nonphosphorylated IRAK to the phosphorylated form. It is not clear at this point how closely correlated the activation of IRAK is relative to its total phosphorylation. The addition of 25 µM K-252b inhibits IRAK phosphorylation to the extent that IRAK is largely undegraded by 10 min, yet it has little effect on the subsequent activation of the Ikappa Balpha kinase as measured by the phosphorylation and degradation of Ikappa Balpha (Fig. 6). This suggests that IRAK may still be activated (perhaps even phosphorylated on its activation loop, see Ref. 43) to a sufficient extent to lead to subsequent Ikappa Balpha phosphorylation, but not so extensively phosphorylated that it itself is recognized for proteasome destruction. Alternatively, the signaling pathway may be so amplified that a small amount of IRAK activity still formed at 25 µM K-252b is sufficient to activate enough of the downstream kinases to phosphorylate Ikappa Balpha . Unfortunately the amount of IRAK activity in the MRC-5 cells using artificial exogenous substrates is too low to accurately correlate its activity with the extent of its phosphorylation (data not shown).

Clearly there are at least two forms of IRAK present within the cells. The first and most prominent form of IRAK is that form that associates with the IL-1R1, becomes phosphorylated, and is then degraded. Despite the destruction of the majority of IRAK following IL-1 stimulation, a significant amount of IRAK remains undegraded, replaced perhaps by new synthesis, to enable the prolonged immunoprecipitation of the IL-1R1. But the steady state amount of IRAK during prolonged IL-1 stimulation is probably only 20% of the original amount (see Figs. 5C and 7B, top panels), yet the amount of the IL-1R1 remaining associated with IRAK is almost unchanging (Figs. 5D and 7B, bottom panels). This suggests perhaps that the IL-1R1 comes together in an unknown complex containing a number of IL-1R1 molecules associated with IRAK. Perhaps once formed, this IL-1R1 complex is stable so that only a small amount of IRAK need be present to enable the immunoprecipitation of the whole complex. Proteasome inhibitors do not change this stoichiometry; proteasome inhibitors lead to the retention of double the amount of IRAK as well as double the amount of IL-1R1 that can be coimmunoprecipitated (see Fig. 7B, top and bottom panels).

The number of IL-R1 molecules that we observe to be immunoprecipitated in these experiments is comparable with earlier reports of IL-1R1 molecules that need to occupied for cell activation. MRC-5 cells contain about 3000 high affinity IL-1 receptors/cell (KD ~10 pM (44)), a level which is among the highest of any cell lines (see Ref. 45). Occupation by IL-1 of fewer than 20 receptors/cell is sufficient for activation (46), resulting in only 2-3% of the available receptors that need to be utilized (see Ref. 47). In line with these former observations, we have observed that from a plate containing 5 × 106 MRC-5 cells we immunoprecipitate with anti IL-1R1 antibodies an amount of IL-1R1 comparable with 1 ng of sIL-1R1 (estimated molecular weight: 60,000, (48); see, for example, Fig. 2A). This corresponds to an immunoprecipitation of 2500 IL-1R1 molecules/MRC-5 cell. Following IL-1 stimulation and immunoprecipitation by IRAK antibodies, only 2-4% of these receptors become associated with IRAK. Because apparently only a portion of the most highly glycosylated form of the IL-1R1 becomes associated with IRAK, those IL-1R1 molecules associating with IRAK are a distinct subset of the total IL-1R1 molecules in the MRC-5 cells. It is possible that different glycosylation or other unidentified posttranslational modifications yield IL-1R1 molecules of varying affinity for IL-1 on the extracellular surface or for IRAK on the cytoplasmic surface.

A second form of IRAK comprises that small percentage of IRAK that remains as unphosphorylated, unstimulated IRAK (see e.g. Figs. 5A and 7A, top panels). It is not found associated with IL-1R1 immunoprecipitates (Fig. 2A and data not shown), suggesting that it is not associated with the IL-1R1 at any time during the IL-1 stimulation. The amounts of this form of IRAK do not change with time, nor are they increased in the presence of proteasome inhibitors. It is possible that this unmodified IRAK represents a pool of unphosphorylated IRAK sequestered in a different part of the cell. Alternatively this IRAK form may be structurally different, because it has varying posttranslational modifications or is translated from an alternatively transcribed mRNA.

While TNFalpha clearly activates MRC-5 cells to a similar extent as IL-1, it is unknown which is the responsible TNF receptor in the MRC-5 cells. Most likely it is the 55-kDa TNFR1 that is active, since it is known that the TNFR1 is more widespread among cell types and that the TNFR1 is thought to be associated with the activation of nonlymphoid cells (see Refs. 49 and 50 for reviews). Furthermore, when cells containing both types of TNF receptors were activated with TNF muteins specific for individual TNF receptors (51), only the TNFR1 produced an activation of NF-kappa B (52). This kinase has recently been identified as the receptor interacting protein, which also interacts with the TNFR1 via its death domain sequence (53-56).

Following its initial degradation, Ikappa Balpha is resynthesized and returns as a nonphosphorylated protein insensitive to further IL-1 activation (see Fig. 8C). Because this new pool of Ikappa Balpha remains sensitive to activation by TNFalpha , however, the ubiquitin-dependent kinase is still functional, whereas the IL-1/IRAK activation pathway is down-regulated (Fig. 8C). Prolonged IL-1 stimulation has little overall effect on the levels of IL-1R1 in the MRC-5 cells nor their ability to be associated with IRAK. There is present from 30 to 120 min a persistent low level amount of phosphorylated IRAK as seen by immunoblots as well as a small amount of the apparently unphosphorylated IRAK (Fig. 7A) that suggests a steady state resynthesis, activation, and subsequent degradation of IRAK. The presence of proteasome inhibitors increases the steady state amount of the phosphorylated IRAK that is detected and the corresponding amount of the IL-1R1 that is coprecipitated. Neither the addition of more IL-1alpha nor of TNFalpha has any further effect on these levels.


FOOTNOTES

*   The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    To whom all correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Inflammation Research, Merck Research Laboratories, P. O. Box 2000, R80N-A32, Rahway, NJ 07065. Tel.: 908-594-6838; Fax: 908-594-3111; E-mail: douglas_miller{at}merck.com.
1   The abbreviations used are: IL, interleukin; IL-1R1, Type I IL-1 receptor; IRAK, interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; Cbz, benzyloxycarbonyl.
2   A. Heguy, personal communication.
3   S. M. Raju and D. K. Miller, unpublished results.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank John Mudgett, Jack Schmidt, Mike Tocci, and Rick Mumford for helpful discussions and comments on this manuscript and John Shockey for the preparation of the figures.


REFERENCES

  1. Dinarello, C. A. (1994) Eur. Cytokine Netw. 5, 517-531 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Siebenlist, U., Franzoso, G., and Brown, K. (1994) Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 10, 405-455 [CrossRef]
  3. Martin, M., Bol, G. F., Eriksson, A., Resch, K., and Brigelius-Flohe, R. (1994) Eur. J. Immunol. 24, 1566-1571 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Croston, G. E., Cao, Z., and Goeddel, D. V. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 16514-16517 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Cao, Z., Henzel, W. J., and Gao, X. (1996) Science 271, 1128-1131 [Abstract]
  6. Trofimova, M., Sprenkle, A. B., Green, M., Sturgill, T. W., Goebl, M. G., and Harrington, M. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 17609-17612 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Chen, Z. J., Parent, L., and Maniatis, T. (1996) Cell 84, 853-862 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Beg, A. A., Finco, T. S., Nantermet, P. V., and Baldwin, A. S. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 3301-3310 [Abstract]
  9. Darnay, B. G., Reddy, S. A. G., and Aggarwal, B. B. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 19687-19690 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Darnay, B. G., Reddy, S. A. G., and Aggarwal, B. B. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 20299-20304 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. VanArsdale, T. L., and Ware, C. F. (1994) J. Immunol. 153, 3043-3050 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Ghosh, S., and Baltimore, D. (1990) Nature 344, 678-682 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Traenckner, E. B.-M., Pahl, H. L., Henkel, T., Schmidt, K. N., Wilk, S., and Baeuerle, P. A. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 2876-2883 [Abstract]
  14. Chen, Z., Hagler, J., Palombella, V. J., Melandri, F., Schere, D., Ballard, D., and Maniatis, T. (1995) Genes Dev. 9, 1586-1597 [Abstract]
  15. Brown, K., Gerstberger, S., Carlson, L., Franzoso, G., and Siebenlist, U. (1995) Science 267, 1485-1488 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Alkalay, I., Yaron, A., Hatzubai, A., Orian, A., Ciechanover, A., and Ben-Neriah, Y. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 10599-10603 [Abstract]
  17. Ingham, P. (1994) Nature 372, 500-501 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Morisato, D., and Anderson, K. V. (1995) Annu. Rev. Genet. 29, 371-399 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Gay, N., and Keith, F. J. (1991) Nature 351, 355-356 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Schneider, D. S., Hudson, K. L., Lin, T.-Y., and Anderson, K. V. (1991) Genes Dev. 5, 797-807 [Abstract]
  21. Heguy, A., Baldari, C. T., Macchia, G., Telford, J. L., and Melli, M. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 2605-2609 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Reach, M., Galindo, R. L., Towb, P., Allen, J. L., Karin, M., and Wasserman, S. A. (1996) Dev. Biol. 180, 353-364 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Belvin, M. P., Jin, Y., and Anderson, K. V. (1995) Genes Dev. 9, 783-793 [Abstract]
  24. Shelton, C. A., and Wasserman, S. A. (1993) Cell 72, 515-525 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Grosshans, J., Bergmann, A., Haffter, P., and Nusslein-Volhard, C. (1994) Nature 372, 563-566 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Galindo, R. L., Edwards, D. N., Gillespie, S. K. H., and Wasserman, S. A. (1995) Development (Camb.) 121, 2209-2218 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Feinstein, E., Kimchi, A., Wallach, D., Boldin, M., and Varfolomeev, E. (1995) Trends Biochem. Sci. 20, 342-344 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Huang, B., Eberstadt, M., Olejniczak, E. T., Meadows, R. P., and Fesik, S. W. (1996) Nature 384, 638-641 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Hanks, S. K., and Hunter, T. (1995) FASEB J 9, 576-596 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Dinarello, C. S., and Thompson, R. C. (1991) Immunol. Today 12, 404-410 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Shenolikar, S., and Nairn, A. C. (1991) Adv. Second Messenger Phosphoprotein Res. 23, 1-121 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Urdal, D. L., Call, S. M., Jackson, J. L., and Dower, S. K. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 2870-2877 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Roff, M., Thompson, J., Rodriguez, M. S., Jacque, J.-M., Baleux, F., Arenzana-Seisdedos, F., and Hay, R. T. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 7844-7850 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Traenckner, E. B.-M., and Baeuerle, P. A. (1995) J. Cell Sci. 19, 79-84
  35. Palombella, V. J., Rando, O. J., Goldberg, A. L., and Maniatis, T. (1994) Cell 78, 773-785 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Ruegg, U. T., and Burgess, G. M. (1989) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 10, 218-220 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Knusel, B., and Hefti, F. (1992) J. Neurochem. 59, 1987-1996 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Thompson, J. E., Phillips, R. J., Erdjument-Bromage, H., Tempst, P., and Ghosh, S. (1995) Cell 80, 573-582 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Greenfeder, S. A., Nunes, P., Kwee, L., Labow, M., Chizzonite, R. A., and Ju, G. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13757-13765 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Beyaert, R., Vanhaesebroeck, B., Declercq, W., Van Lint, J., Vandenabeele, P., Agostinis, P., Vandenheede, J. R., and Fiers, W. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 23293-23299 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. DiDonato, J., Mercurio, F., Rosette, C., Wu-Li, J., Suyang, H., Ghosh, S., and Karin, M. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 1295-1304 [Abstract]
  42. Thanos, D., and Maniatis, T. (1995) Cell 80, 529-532 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Johnson, L. N., Noble, M. E. M., and Owen, D. J. (1996) Cell 85, 149-158 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Chin, J., Cameron, P. M., Rupp, E., and Schmidt, J. A. (1987) J. Exp. Med. 165, 70-86 [Abstract]
  45. Dower, S. K., and Urdal, D. L. (1987) Immunol. Today 8, 46-51
  46. Sims, J. E., Gayle, M. A., Slack, J. L., Alderson, M. R., Bird, T. A., Giri, J. G., Colotta, F., Re, F., Mantovani, A., Shanebeck, K., Grabstein, K. H., and Dower, S. K. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 6155-6159 [Abstract]
  47. Tocci, M. J., and Schmidt, J. A. (1997) in Cytokines in Health and Disease (Remick, D. G., and Friedland, J. S., eds), Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York , in press
  48. Dower, S. K., Qwarnstrom, E. E., Page, R. C., Blanton, R. A., Kupper, T. S., Raines, E., Ross, R., and Sims, J. E. (1990) J. Invest. Dermatol. 94, 68S-73S [Abstract]
  49. Tartaglia, L. A., and Goeddel, D. V. (1992) Immunol. Today 13, 151-153 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Vandenabeele, P., Declercq, W., Beyaert, R., and Fiers, W. (1995) Trends Cell Biol. 5, 392-399 [CrossRef]
  51. Loetscher, H., Stueber, D., Banner, D., Mackay, F., and Lesslauer, W. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 26350-26357 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Chainy, G. B. N., Singh, S., Raju, U., and Aggarwal, B. B. (1996) J. Immunol. 157, 2410-2417 [Abstract]
  53. Stanger, B. Z., Leder, P., Lee, T.-H., Kim, E., and Seed, B. (1995) Cell 81, 513-523 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  54. Darnay, B. G., Singh, S., Chaturvedi, M. M., and Aggarwal, B. B. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 14867-14870 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Hsu, H., Huang, J., Shu, H.-B., Baichwal, V., and Goeddel, D. V. (1996) Immunity 4, 387-396 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. Ting, A. T., Pimentel-Muinos, F. X., and Seed, B. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 6189-6196 [Abstract]
  57. Miller, D. K., Ayala, J. M., Egger, L. A., Raju, S. M., Yamin, T.-T., Ding, G. J.-F., Gaffney, E. P., Howard, A. D., Palyha, O. C., Rolando, A. M., Salley, J. P., Thornberry, N. A., Weidner, J. R., Williams, J. H., Chapman, K. T., Jackson, J., Kostura, M. J., Limjuco, G., Molineaux, S. M., Mumford, R. A., and Calaycay, J. R. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 18062-18069 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Yamin, T.-T., Ayala, J. M., and Miller, D. K. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 13273-13282 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.