Nitric Oxide Protects Cultured Rat Hepatocytes from Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha -induced Apoptosis by Inducing Heat Shock Protein 70 Expression*

(Received for publication, April 22, 1996, and in revised form, August 28, 1996)

Young-Myeong Kim Dagger §, Michael E. de Vera Dagger , Simon C. Watkins par and Timothy R. Billiar Dagger **

From the Departments of Dagger  Surgery, § Pharmacology, and par  Cell Biology and Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgment
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Nitric oxide (NO) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha ) play important roles in the pathogenesis of liver disease during acute inflammation. The present study was designed to elucidate the effect of NO pre-exposure on TNFalpha -induced hepatotoxicity. Pretreatment of primary cultures of rat hepatocytes with the NO donor S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP) induced the expression of heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) mRNA and protein, which was associated with thermotolerance and cytoprotection from TNFalpha +actinomycin D-induced hepatotoxicity and apoptosis. SNAP transiently changed the intracellular redox state by inducing glutathione (GSH) oxidation associated with the formation of S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO). HSP70 mRNA was also induced by the GSH-oxidizing agent diamide and the GSH-conjugating agent N-ethylmaleimide, suggesting that NO induces HSP70 expression through GSH oxidation.

The protective effect of SNAP pretreatment on TNFalpha -induced apoptosis correlated with the level of HSP70 expression. SNAP pretreatment inhibited reactive oxygen intermediate generation and lipid peroxidation effects that were reversed by blocking HSP70 expression using an antisense oligonucleotide to HSP70. Finally, endogenous NO formation, induced in hepatocytes stimulated with interferon-gamma and interleukin-1beta , led to the formation of GSNO and GSSG, induced HSP70, and attenuated TNFalpha -mediated cytotoxicity. These findings demonstrated that NO can induce resistance to TNFalpha -induced hepatotoxicity, possibly through the stimulation of HSP70 expression.


INTRODUCTION

Many cell types have the capacity to generate NO from L-arginine. However, the level of NO production and the functional role of NO can vary between cell types. Two constitutive calcium-dependent NO synthases (cNOS)1: neuronal cNOS (nNOS or NOS1) and the endothelial cNOS (eNOS or NOS3), generate small quantities of NO sufficient only for cellular signaling under most circumstances. However, some cells that are exquisitely sensitive to NO, such as neurons, have been shown to exhibit toxicity in response to NOS1 activation (1). A third isoform, NOS2, typically expressed after exposure of cells to inflammatory stimuli (e.g. cytokines and microbial products), originally was referred to as the inducible NOS (iNOS). More recently, it has been recognized that NOS2 is expressed in some resting epithelial cells (2). NO production by NOS2 occurs independent of elevations in basal intracellular calcium concentration (3), and the quantities produced are sufficient to damage or kill susceptible cells (4) or microorganisms (5).

The precise factors that determine cellular sensitivity to NO-mediated toxicity are not clear; however, a number of molecular targets for NO and its reaction products have been identified. It is through the interaction with these targets, typically sulfhydryl-containing molecules (6, 7) or redox metal-containing proteins (8), that NO affects its biological action. The quantities of NO generated by cNOS isoforms are adequate to activate soluble guanylate cyclase by dislocation of the heme iron within the enzyme (9). Other signaling actions of NO mediated via redox-sensitive sites include inhibition of protein kinase C, activation of tyrosine kinase, inactivation of NF-kappa B, activation of SoxRS, and activation of G proteins (reviewed in Ref. 10). NO also causes several metabolic alterations by inhibiting the actions of certain thiol- and iron-containing enzymes and thus inhibits mitochondrial respiration, the tricarboxylic acid cycle, DNA synthesis, and antioxidant and DNA repair enzymes. NO and superoxide react together at a diffusion-controlled rate to yield peroxynitrite (ONOO-), which inflicts cellular injury through oxidation of many biological molecules. Furthermore, ONOO- has also been implicated in the inactivation of Mn and Fe superoxide dismutase (11) and aconitase (12, 13). In contrast, NO may protect cells from reactive oxygen intermediate (ROI)-mediated cytotoxicity by scavenging superoxide anions which are implicated in toxicity through the formation of hydrogen peroxide or hydroxyl radical via the Fenton reaction (14). NO also reduces toxic ferryl species to ferrous ion, thereby blocking the hemoprotein-mediated Fenton-like reaction (15). Furthermore, NO has been shown to terminate the propagation of radical-mediated lipid peroxidation (16).

Hepatocytes express NOS2 and produce large amounts of NO in response to the synergistic combination of cytokines such as TNFalpha , IL-1beta , and IFNgamma (17) or IL-1beta alone in sufficient concentrations (18). This NO synthesis has been associated with DNA condensation, inhibition of protein synthesis, and decreased levels of cytochrome P450 and catalase activity in vitro (19). Despite these changes, hepatocytes are rather resistant to NO toxicity. Exposure to NO also protects primary cultured hepatocytes from the cytotoxic effects of higher doses of NO and H2O2 (20). This protective action appears to be mediated by the induction of cytoprotective stress proteins such as heme oxygenase, which, in turn, results from NO-induced alteration in iron homeostasis.

In vivo, large quantities of NO can be generated in the liver in acute inflammation (21, 22). We have suggested that this NO can have protective actions. TNFalpha is also produced in the liver in inflammation (23), most likely by the resident macrophages. Studies into the mechanism of hepatic TNFalpha toxicity have shown that TNFalpha in the presence of RNA or protein synthesis inhibitors induces DNA fragmentation characteristic of apoptosis (24). Furthermore, TNFalpha is thought to mediate liver injury in acute inflammation (25) and contribute to fulminant hepatic failure (26, 27). In other cell types, NO has been shown to either promote (28, 29) or inhibit (30, 31) apoptosis. Both NO and TNFalpha would be expected to be present in the liver under many inflammatory liver conditions; however, it is unknown if NO exposure potentiates or prevents TNFalpha toxicity in hepatocytes. In this study, we examined the consequences of NO exposure on TNFalpha -induced apoptosis in cultured rat hepatocytes. We report that NO exposure prevents subsequent TNFalpha -induced cell death through the induction of heat shock protein 70 (HSP70).


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

Williams medium E, penicillin, streptomycin, L-glutamine, and HEPES were purchased from Life Technologies, Inc. Insulin was purchased from Lilly, and calf serum was obtained from HyClone Laboratories (Logan, UT). Murine macrophage NOS2 monoclonal antibody was obtained from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY). TNFalpha was purchased from Genzyme (Cambridge, MA); LipofectAMINE was purchased from R&D Systems. Anti-HSP70 monoclonal antibodies were obtained from Sigma or Stress Gen (Victoria, BC, Canada). Dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCF-DA) was purchased from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR), and protein assay reagent was purchased from Pierce. 125I-Labeled human TNFalpha was purchased from Amersham; NF-kappa B-specific oligonucleotides and T4 polynucleotide kinase were obtained from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA) and Boehringer Mannheim, respectively. S-Nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP) was synthesized every 2 months as described previously (32), stored frozen as a solid aliquot in the dark, and checked for stoichiometric S-nitrosothiol content by the method of Saville (33). NG-Monomethyl-L-arginine (NMA) was purchased from Cyclopss (Salt Lake City, UT). Luciferase assay kits and lysis buffer were purchased from Promega (Madison, WI). HSP70 antisense oligomer (TGTTTTCTTGGCCAT), HSP70 sense oligomer (ATGGCCAAGAAAACA), HSC70 antisense oligomer (AGGTCCCTTAGACAT), and HSC70 sense oligomer (ATGTCTAAGGGACCT) were synthesized from sequences complementary to the initiation codon and four downstream codons of rat HSP70 mRNA (34) and rat HSC70 mRNA (35). All other chemicals and proteins were purchased from Sigma, unless indicated otherwise.

Hepatocyte Isolation and Culture

Purified hepatocytes were isolated from male Sprague-Dawley rats (200-300 g, Harlan Sprague-Dawley) by collagenase perfusion using the method of Seglen (36). Hepatocytes were purified to >98% purity by repeated centrifugation at 50 g, followed by further purification over 30% Percoll. Viability at time of plating was consistently 90-95% by trypan blue exclusion. Hepatocytes were cultured in Williams medium E supplemented with 1 µM insulin, 2 mM L-glutamine, 15 mM HEPES, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 10% low endotoxin calf serum in 100-mm Petri dishes (5 ml/dish) at a concentration of 1 × 106 cells/ml for 16 h, which represents near-confluent culture conditions. Some cells were pretreated with SNAP (as described in the figure legends) or with a cytokine mixture (CM: 200 units/ml IFNgamma and 200 units/ml IL-1beta ) with or without 1.5 mM NMA in supplemented Williams medium E containing 5% calf serum. The cells were then incubated with 28 ng/ml TNFalpha and 325 nM actinomycin D (ActD) for 9 h at various intervals after the SNAP or CM addition, as indicated under "Results." To examine the effect of antisense oligonucleotides against HSP70, hepatocytes were preincubated with HSP70 sense or antisense oligomers (10 µM) for 4 h and then treated with 750 µM SNAP for 16 h. The cells were washed twice with fresh medium and then exposed to TNFalpha and ActD in medium containing oligonucleotides. Cell viability was determined by crystal violet staining, as described (20).

Cytosolic DNA Extraction and Electrophoresis

Cultured hepatocytes were washed with PBS, harvested using a plastic scraper, and pelleted by centrifugation at maximum speed in a microcentrifuge for 10 s at 4 °C. Cytosolic DNA was prepared by method of Leist et al. (27). Briefly, the pellets were resuspended in 750 µl of lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM EDTA, 0.5% Triton X-100, pH 8.0) and occasionally shaken while on ice for 45 min. The cytosolic fraction was collected by centrifugation at 13,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C and protein concentrations determined. Cytosol aliquots containing equal amounts of protein were extracted with mixture of phenol and chloroform. One-tenth volume of 3 M sodium acetate was added to the solution, and DNA was precipitated by adding an equal volume of isopropanol. After storing at -20 °C overnight, a DNA pellet was obtained by centrifugation at 13,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C and washed twice with 75% ethanol. The pellet was dried and resuspended in 100 µl of 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0. After digesting RNA with RNase (0.1 mg/ml) at 37 °C for 1 h, samples (15 µl) were electrophoresed through a 1.2% agarose gel in 450 mM Tris borate + EDTA (TBE), pH 8.0 buffer. DNA was photographed under visualization with UV light.

RNA Isolation and Northern Blot Analysis

Total RNA was isolated from the cultured hepatocytes as described previously (17). The RNA (20 µg) was electrophoresed on 1% agarose gel containing 1% formaldehyde, transferred to GeneScreen, hybridized with human HSP70 [32P]cDNA and mouse macrophage NOS2 [32P] cDNA, and exposed to autoradiography film. Relative mRNA levels were quantitated by PhosphorImager.

Western Blot Analysis

Western blot analysis was performed using a method modified in our laboratories as described previously (37). Briefly, harvested hepatocytes (5 × 106 cells) were lysed in 100 µl of 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4, containing protease inhibitors (0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml aprotinin, 5 µg/ml pepstatin A, and 1 µg/ml cymostatin) by three freeze-thaw cycles, and the cytosolic fraction was obtained by centrifugation at 13,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C. Samples (40 µg of protein) were separated on 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and gels were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. The membranes were blotted by 5% milk in PBS, pH 7.5, Tween (0.01%) for 1 h at room temperature and then hybridized with one of two different monoclonal anti-HSP70 antibodies (1:1000 dilution). After three washes with PBS-Tween, the blots were hybridized with goat anti-mouse IgG (1:1000 dilution) linked to horseradish peroxidase. Membranes were developed with chemiluminescence reagents (DuPont NEN) and exposed to Kodak X-Omat film for 2-10 min.

Enzyme Activity Assays

Hepatocytes were collected from Petri dishes, resuspended in PBS containing protease inhibitors, and sonicated (Sonic & Materials, Danbury, CT) with three 15-s bursts while on ice. The solution was centrifuged at maximum speed for 15 min at 4 °C in the microcentrifuge and the supernatant used for enzyme activity assays. Antioxidant enzyme activities were measured as described by Wheeler et al (38). Catalase activity was spectrophotometrically determined by measuring decreased absorbance at 240 nm using hydrogen peroxide as a substrate. The activity was calculated from molecular extinction coefficient of 43.6 M-1 cm-1 for H2O2. GSH peroxidase activity was determined in the presence of GSH reductase by the decrease in NADPH concentration. Superoxide dismutase activity was measured spectrophotometrically by monitoring the inhibition of the reduction of ferricytochrome c at 550 nm in the xanthine oxidase and hypoxanthine system.

Measurement of ROI and Lipid Peroxidation

Intracellular ROI were measured following formation of a fluorescent derivative of DCF-DA (39). Briefly, hepatocytes were incubated with 100 µM DCF-DA (in ethanol) with or without TNFalpha +ActD or the equivalent amount of ethanol for 80 min in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C. After incubation, the cells were washed with PBS, harvested, and immediately used to determine the level of fluorescence in a spectrophotofluorimeter (excitation, 488 nm; emission, 520 nm). Cell numbers were determined in parallel, and fluorescent values were normalized to the number of cells in each sample. Lipid peroxidation was assayed by measuring thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) at 535 nm (40). Butylated hydroxytoluene (0.04%) was added to the thiobarbituric acid solution to prevent lipid autooxidation during the assay procedure.

Measurement of Glutathione, Oxidized Glutathione, and S-Nitrosoglutathione

Hepatocytes (2 × 107 cells) were resuspended in 400 µl of 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4, containing 50 µg/ml lysophosphatidylcholine and protease inhibitors. The cytosolic fraction was obtained by microcentrifugation at maximum speed at 4 C for 10 min after three cycles of freeze-thaw. Cytosol (150 µl) was mixed with 7.5 µl of 100% trichloroacetic acid and incubated in ice for 5 min. Immediately after the supernatant was obtained by centrifugation, cellular glutathione (GSH) and GSSG were assayed by the GSH reductase recycling method (41). S-Nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) was measured by the method of Clancy et al. (42). Briefly, cytosol was incubated with 0.1 M NaBH4 at 37 °C for 5 min to break the S-nitroso bond. The solution was acidified to remove excess NaBH4, and acid-soluble fraction was obtained by centrifugation. Total glutathione was assayed as described above. The concentration of GSNO was calculated as the difference in GSH levels between untreated and NaBH4-treated cytosolic GSH.

Electromobility Shift Assay

Nuclear extracts were prepared by the method of Staal et al. (43) from hepatocytes stimulated with 500 units/ml TNFalpha for 1 h. The cells were washed with ice-cold PBS, scraped into PBS, and centrifuged at 3,000 rpm in a microcentrifuge at 4 °C for 5 min. After discarding the supernatant, the pelleted cells were resuspended in 5 volumes of Buffer A (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 10 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 0.5% Nonidet P-40). The cells were disrupted with 10 hand strokes in a Dounce homogenizer, and nuclei were recovered by centrifugation at 5,000 rpm for 15 min and resuspended in the same volume of Buffer B (Buffer A without Nonidet P-40). After another 15-min centrifugation at 5,000 rpm, nuclear proteins were extracted at 4 °C by gently mixing the nuclei in 150 µl of Buffer C (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 10 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10% glycerol, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.2 mM EDTA, and 0.5 mM dithiothreitol) and adding 50 µl of Buffer D (Buffer C with 400 mM KCl) in a dropwise fashion. Supernatants were collected after 1 h by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 30 min. For the electromobility shift assay, NF-kappa B-specific oligonucleotide were end-labeled with [gamma -32P]ATP using T4 polynucleotide kinase and purified on a G-50 Sephadex column. Nuclear extracts (10 µg of protein) were incubated with ~40,000 cpm (~0.5 ng) of 32P-labeled oligonucleotide for 20 min at room temperature in a buffer containing 2 µg of poly(dI-dC), 4.2 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 2.5% glycerol, 4.2 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.02 mM EDTA, 2% Ficoll, and 21 mM dithiothreitol (final volume of 30 µl). DNA-protein complexes were resolved on a 5% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel in TBE running buffer. Following electrophoresis, gels were dried and subjected to autoradiography.

NF-kappa B-Luciferase Reporter Construction and Bioassay

This reporter (NF-kappa B-pT109) was constructed by inserting three copies of the NF-kappa B response element (5'-GGGGACTTTCCCGGGGACTTTCCCGGGGACTTTCCC-3', Life Technologies, Inc.) into pTK-Luc (44), a plasmid carrying a portion of the herpes thymidine kinase promoter (-109 to +52) ligated upstream of luciferase. DNA transfections into hepatocytes were carried out in six-well plates using LipofectAMINE, as described (44). The transfected cells were allowed to recover overnight, exposed to 750 µM SNAP for 16 h, and stimulated with TNFalpha (500 units/ml) for 6 h. After washing twice with PBS, cells were lysed with Reporter lysis buffer. Luciferase activity was assayed using 20 µl of lysate in an AutoLumat LB953 luminometer (Berthold, Nashua, NH) using a luciferase assay kit. Luciferase activity was normalized to protein concentration.

TNFalpha Receptor Binding Assay

TNFalpha binding to cell surface receptors was assayed as described previously (45). Briefly, hepatocytes (2.5 × 105 cells/well in 12-well plates) were pretreated with 750 µM SNAP for 16 h, washed with serum-free medium twice, and incubated with 125I-labeled human TNFalpha (0.2-1.6 nM, 780 Ci/mmol) in the presence or absence of excess unlabeled TNFalpha (200-fold). After a 3-h incubation at 4 °C, the cells were washed three times with prewarmed medium containing 5% calf serum, and cell-bound radioactivity was counted in a gamma  counter after solubilizing in 5% Triton X-100. Specific binding of 125I-labeled TNFalpha was calculated as the difference in binding in the absence and presence of excess unlabeled TNFalpha .

Light and Electron Microscopy

To analyze both the number and morphology of the apparent apoptosis within the cell population, a combination of light and electron microscopic methods were used. Monolayers of cells were treated as described earlier, fixed lightly in 2% paraformaldehyde, and counterstained with Hoescht 33258 (2 mg/ml) for 3 min. The cells were then mounted without washing in Gelvatol (Monsanto, St. Louis, MO) and observed using a Nikon FXL photomicroscope. Random images were collected using a 3-Chip Sony color camera, and stored with a coded identification number. The apoptotic nuclei in each field were counted in a blinded fashion. For electron microscopy, the treated cells were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M PBS for 1 h, washed in PBS, postfixed for 1 h in 1% aqueous osmium tetroxide, dehydrated through graded alcohols, and embedded in Epon (Energy Beam Science, Ahawam, MA). Following embedment, thin (60 nm) sections were cut using a Raichert Ultracut S (Leica, Chicago IL) microtome, mounted on copper grids, counterstained with 2% uranyl acetate (7 min) and 1% lead citrate (2 min), dried, and observed using a JEOL 100CX microscope.

Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as mean ± S.D. of at least three separate experiments. Comparisons between two values were performed using paired Student's t test. Differences were considered significant when the p value was equal to or less than 0.05.


RESULTS

SNAP Pretreatment Protects Hepatocytes from TNFalpha Toxicity

Our laboratory has shown previously that pretreatment of hepatocytes with an NO-donor protects hepatocytes from subsequent H2O2 toxicity (20). To determine if NO pretreatment also protects against TNFalpha -induced toxicity, freshly isolated rat hepatocytes were exposed to 750 µM SNAP as an NO donor, and 18 h later the cells were washed, TNFalpha was added, and viability was determined by crystal violet staining (Fig. 1). Pretreatment with 750 µM SNAP alone did not reduce hepatocyte viability, while TNFalpha (28 ng/ml) induced a 12% and 5% cytotoxicity in untreated and SNAP-pretreated hepatocytes, respectively. It has been shown previously that the transcriptional inhibitor ActD markedly increases TNFalpha toxicity (24). As shown in Fig. 1, viability measured at 14 h after TNFalpha addition was decreased by 38% when ActD was combined with TNFalpha . Pretreatment with SNAP for 16 h protected cultured hepatocytes from TNFalpha +ActD toxicity. If cells were exposed to TNFalpha +ActD at intervals of 1-6 h after SNAP exposure, no protection was seen (data not shown).


Fig. 1. Effect of SNAP pretreatment on TNFalpha -mediated hepatotoxicity. Hepatocytes plated on 12-well plates were pretreated with 750 µM SNAP for 16 h in Williams medium E containing 5% calf serum. Cells were washed twice with fresh medium and incubated with TNFalpha (28 ng/ml) or TNFalpha +ActD (325 nM) for 14 h. Cell viability was determined by crystal violet staining. *, p < 0.05 versus SNAP-pretreated medium alone.
[View Larger Version of this Image (19K GIF file)]


Since TNFalpha -mediated cytotoxicity has been shown to be associated with increased production of superoxide (46) and blocked by superoxide dismutase (47), we measured intracellular levels of antioxidative enzymes to determine if SNAP pretreatment increased levels of specific intracellular antioxidant(s). As shown in Table I, the cellular levels of the major antioxidants (including catalase, superoxide dismutase, and GSH peroxidase) were not elevated in SNAP-treated hepatocytes, indicating that the SNAP-induced cytoprotective effect was not associated with increases in these cellular antioxidative activities.

Table I.

Effects of SNAP pretreatment on cellular antioxidant enzyme activities

Hepatocytes were harvested after pretreatment with 750 µM SNAP for 16 h, washed twice with ice-cold PBS, resuspended in PBS containing protease inhibitors, and sonicated on ice. Cytosolic fractions were obtained after centrifugation and used for enzyme assays. Enzyme activities were measured as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Enzymes Activitya
Control SNAP (16 h)

Catalase 824.4  ± 98.7b 728.0  ± 84.6
Superoxide dismutase 77.1  ± 6.7 69.8  ± 7.0
GSH peroxidase 383.8  ± 61.6 421.5  ± 81.2

a  One unit of enzyme activity: catalase, the decomposition of 1.0 µmol of H202/min/mg of protein; superoxide dismutase, the change of 0.025 absorbance/min/mg of protein; GSH peroxidase, the oxidation of nmol NADPH/min/mg of protein.
b  Values represent mean ± S.D. for three separate experiments.

SNAP Pretreatment Protects from TNFalpha +ActD-induced Apoptosis

Since TNFalpha +ActD toxicity in hepatocytes is associated with the induction of apoptosis, we examined the effect of SNAP pretreatment on TNFalpha +ActD-induced DNA fragmentation. Fig. 2A shows that TNFalpha +ActD, but not TNFalpha or ActD alone, induced DNA fragmentation characteristic of apoptosis in cultured hepatocytes. Pretreatment with 750 µM SNAP at 4 or 8 h prior to TNFalpha +ActD addition had no effect; however, if TNFalpha +ActD were added 12 h after SNAP treatment, the degree of DNA fragmentation was markedly reduced, and by 16 h apoptosis was almost completely inhibited. When concentrations of SNAP ranging from 100 to 750 µM were added to hepatocytes 18 h prior to TNFalpha +ActD, only SNAP concentrations of 250 µM or greater were found to protect hepatocytes from apoptosis (Fig. 2B).


Fig. 2. SNAP pretreatment protects hepatocytes from TNFalpha -mediated apoptosis in a time-dependent (A) and dose-dependent (B) manner. Hepatocytes were pretreated with 750 µM SNAP (A) or different concentrations (B), for various time periods (A) or 16 h (B), washed twice with fresh medium, and incubated with TNFalpha +ActD for 9 h. Cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS, harvested, and lysed with 20 mM Tris buffer, pH 8.0, containing 10 mM EDTA and 0.5% Triton X-100. Cytosolic DNA was isolated as described under "Experimental Procedures" and electrophoresed on an agarose gel after normalizing DNA amount by protein concentration. DNA was visualized with UV light and photographed.
[View Larger Version of this Image (31K GIF file)]


SNAP Induces HSP70 Expression

The major heat shock protein, HSP70, has been shown to protect various types of cells from TNFalpha -induced injury (48, 49, 50). To determine if SNAP treatment induced hepatocyte HSP70 expression, we exposed hepatocytes to increasing concentrations of SNAP for different time periods and examined HSP70 expression by Northern and Western blot. Untreated hepatocytes expressed a 2.8-kilobase mRNA consistent with the constitutive heat shock protein 70, or HSC70 (Fig. 3A). SNAP treatment resulted in a concentration-dependent increase in the expression of HSC70 as well as the appearance of a 3.1-kilobase mRNA band consistent with inducible HSP70 (51). HSP70 mRNA expression was detected at concentrations of SNAP as low as 100 µM and was maximal at 750 µM. Western blot analysis, using a monoclonal antibody (Sigma) that detects both HSC70 and HSP70, demonstrated a dose-dependent increase in expression of HSC70 and appearance of HSP70 protein in hepatocytes treated with SNAP 16 h previously (Fig. 3B). Fig. 3C shows a time course for HSP70 mRNA levels following exposure to 750 µM SNAP and demonstrates that mRNA levels progressively increased until 12 h and then declined. Similarly, the level of HSP70 protein measured using an HSP70-specific monocloncal antibody (Stress Gen) following SNAP pretreatment increased progressively up to 16 h and then decreased (Fig. 3D).


Fig. 3.

Analysis of SNAP-mediated HSP70 induction by Northern and Western blot. Hepatocytes were treated with increasing concentrations of SNAP for 12 h (A) or 16 h (B), or for different time periods with 750 µM SNAP (C and D). Cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and harvested. For Northern blot analysis (A and C), RNA was isolated, electrophoresed, hybridized with a probe to HSP70, and relative levels of RNA were quantitated by PhosphorImager. For Western blots (B and D), cells were lysed with 20 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.4, containing protease inhibitors. The cytosolic fraction was obtained after centrifugation at maximum speed in microcentrifuge at 4 °C. Protein (40 µg) was separated on 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gels, transferred to nitrocellulose membrane, hybridized with monoclonal anti-HSP70 antibody (Sigma for B, which detects both HSC70 and HSP70; Stress Gen for D, which detects only HSP70), and anti-mouse IgG-linked horseradish peroxidase, and exposed to x-ray film after developing with chemiluminescence reagent.


[View Larger Version of this Image (19K GIF file)]


SNAP Pretreatment Induces GSH Oxidation and GSNO Formation Responsible for HSP70 Induction

Because NO reacts with intracellular thiols such as GSH (10), we examined intracellular GSH and its derivatives. As shown in Fig. 4A, intracellular GSH levels in hepatocytes exposed to 750 µM SNAP decreased by about 50% at 4-6 h following exposure to 750 µM SNAP and then slowly recovered to control level (15 h). Intracellular GSNO levels increased to a maximum of 28% of total GSH at 4 h, while GSSG levels became maximal at 34% of total GSH at 6 h. Since it is known that conjugation, depletion, or oxidation of GSH increases the levels of cytoprotective heat shock proteins, including HSP70 (52, 53), in some cell types we studied the level of HSP70 mRNA in hepatocytes with three thiol-modulating agents, each with a different mode of action. HSP70 mRNA was induced by exposure to diamide (a GSH-oxidizing agent) and N-ethylmaleimide (a GSH-conjugating agent), but not by buthionine sulfoximine, which blocks GSH synthesis (Fig. 4B).


Fig. 4. SNAP-induced oxidation and S-nitrosylation of intracellular GSH (A) and HSP70 mRNA induction by thiol-modulating agents (B). Hepatocytes were treated with 750 µM SNAP, washed with ice-cold PBS, resuspended in 20 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.4, containing lysophosphatidylcholine (50 µg/ml) and protease inhibitors, and lysed with three cycles of freeze-thaw. The cytosolic fraction was obtained by centrifugation. Total GSH was measured by the GSH reductase recycling method. S-Nitrosoglutathione was measured by increased glutathione concentration after breaking S-nitroso bond with 0.1 M NaBH4. Hepatocytes were treated with SNAP (750 µM), diamide (250 µM), N-ethylmaleimide (40 µM), and buthionine sulfoximine (250 µM) for 7 h and incubated with fresh medium for another 5 h. Induction of HSP70 mRNA was analyzed by Northern blot as described in Fig. 3.
[View Larger Version of this Image (23K GIF file)]


SNAP Pretreatment Induces Resistance to Heat Shock

Since our data showed that SNAP exposure induced HSP70 expression, we next examined whether pretreatment of hepatocytes with SNAP could result in the expected resistance to subsequent heat challenge. Hepatocytes were pretreated with concentrations of SNAP ranging from 0 to 1 mM for 16 h and then exposed to a heat challenge of 43.5 °C for 4 h. Viability was assayed after culturing the cells with fresh medium for another 12 h at 37 °C. Fig. 5 reveals that hepatocytes developed resistance to heat-induced killing following exposure to SNAP. Increases in viability were seen following exposure to SNAP concentration of 250 µM, and maximum resistance was observed at 750 µM SNAP pretreatment.


Fig. 5. Induction of thermotolerance by SNAP. Hepatocytes were pretreated with different concentrations of SNAP for 16 h. After washing twice with fresh medium, cells were exposed to hyperthermia (43.5 °C) for 4 h and incubated in fresh medium containing 5% calf serum in a CO2 incubator at 37 °C for 12 h. Viability was determined by crystal violet staining as described in Fig. 1.
[View Larger Version of this Image (14K GIF file)]


Heat Exposure Mimics SNAP Treatment

The capacity for SNAP pretreatment to protect against TNFalpha +ActD-mediated apoptosis correlated well with the stimulation of inducible HSP70 expression, suggesting that HSP70 prevented the apoptosis. Therefore, we hypothesized that induction of HSP70 by heat should also prevent apoptosis by TNFalpha +ActD. Hepatocytes were exposed to heat (43.5 °C) for 0-1.5 h and HSP70 protein expression determined 16 h later by Western blot analysis (Fig. 6A). A time-dependent increase in inducible HSP70 protein expression was noted, and the degree of HSP70 expression correlated well with protection from TNFalpha +ActD-induced DNA fragmentation (Fig. 6B). No significant injury (>90% viability as judged by crystal violet staining) was observed during heat treatment.


Fig. 6. Effect of heat exposure on TNFalpha +ActD-mediated apoptosis. Hepatocytes were exposed to heat (43.5 °C) for different time periods and recovered in fresh medium containing 5% calf serum for 16 h. Cells were then incubated with TNFalpha +ActD for another 9 h. Expression of HSP70 protein was analyzed by Western blot as described in Fig. 3 using a monoclonal anti-HSP70 antibody obtained from Stress Gen (top). DNA fragmentation was detected following electrophoresis on an agarose gel as described in Fig. 2 (bottom).
[View Larger Version of this Image (36K GIF file)]


Antisense Oligomer to HSP70 Blocks HSP70 Expression and Protection against TNFalpha +ActD-induced Apoptosis

To determine if HSP70 was directly responsible for the inhibition of apoptosis induced by SNAP exposure, hepatocytes were incubated with HSP70 antisense oligonucleotide (10 µM) during a 750 µM SNAP pretreatment, followed by TNFalpha +ActD exposure. Antisense oligomers blocked induction of HSP70 expression (Fig. 7A) and inhibited SNAP-induced protection from TNFalpha +ActD-mediated apoptosis (Fig. 7B). Sense oligomers had no effect on induction of HSP70 protein expression and did not inhibit the SNAP-induced cytoprotection. In contrast, HSC70 antisense oligomers (10 µM), which blocked HSC70 expression, had no effect on SNAP-stimulated HSP70 protein expression or protection from TNFalpha cytotoxicity following SNAP exposure (data not shown).


Fig. 7. Effect of HSP70 antisense oligomer on SNAP-induced protection from TNFalpha +ActD-mediated apoptosis. Hepatocytes were pretreated with 750 µM SNAP in the presence or absence of sense (S) or antisense (AS) oligomers to HSP70 for 16 h. Cells were washed twice with fresh medium and then exposed to TNFalpha +ActD for 9 h in the continued presence of oligonucleotide. HSP70 protein expression (top) and DNA fragmentation (bottom) were measured as described in Fig. 6.
[View Larger Version of this Image (31K GIF file)]


Microscopic Examination of Apoptosis

We further confirmed the protective effect of SNAP pretreatment on TNFalpha +ActD-induced apoptosis by light and electron microscopy. Chromatin condensation and peripheral and nuclear blebbing, typical characteristics of apoptotic morphology, were apparent on electron microscopic examination of TNFalpha +ActD-treated hepatocytes (Fig. 8, A and B), but not control cells (Fig. 8C). Similarly, the percentage of apoptotic hepatocytes following TNFalpha +ActD treatment was significantly increased from 7% to 53% (Fig. 8D). Pretreatment with SNAP or heat shock reduced TNFalpha +ActD-induced apoptosis to 17% and 15%, respectively. Antisense oligomers to HSP70 inhibited the antiapoptotic effect of SNAP pretreatment.


Fig. 8. Microscopic measurement of cytoprotective effects of SNAP and heat shock on TNFalpha +ActD-induced apoptosis. Hepatocytes were treated with 750 µM SNAP in the presence or absence of antisense oligomer for 16 h and exposed to heat shock (43.5 °C) for 2 h, followed by recovery with fresh medium containing 5% calf serum for another 16 h. Cells were incubated with or without TNFalpha +ActD for 8 h, then fixed and stained as described under "Experimental Procedures" and observed using either light or electron microscopy. The electron micrographs demonstrate chromatin condensation (arrows) typical of apoptosis in the TNFalpha +ActD-treated cells (A and B). In control cells, normal nuclear morphology with clear nuclei (arrows) is apparent (C). Optical magnification: A and C, ×50,000; B, ×67,000; D, results from quantitative light microscopy.
[View Larger Version of this Image (82K GIF file)]


TNFalpha Binding and NF-kappa B Activation Are Not Reduced by SNAP Pretreatment

Since TNFalpha cytotoxicity can be reduced by inhibiting TNFalpha binding to its receptors (54) and blocking its signal transduction (55), we examined whether NO modified TNFalpha surface binding or TNFalpha signal transduction. SNAP pretreatment did not change the specific binding of TNFalpha to cell surface receptors (Fig. 9A). Similarly, TNFalpha -mediated NF-kappa B activation as determined by electromobility shift assay was unchanged by SNAP pretreatment (Fig. 9B). The lack of an effect of SNAP treatment on TNFalpha -induced NF-kappa B activation was further confirmed in cultured hepatocytes transfected with an NF-kappa B-reporter (luciferase) construct. Induction of luciferase activity in response to TNFalpha was not significantly different between SNAP-treated and control hepatocytes (Fig. 9C), indicating no change in the NF-kappa B activation in this assay which tests NF-kappa B function.


Fig. 9. Effects of SNAP on specific TNFalpha binding (A), NF-kappa B activation (B), and NF-kappa B promoter activity (C). A, hepatocytes were incubated with recombinant human 125I-TNFalpha in the presence or absence of excess unlabeled TNFalpha at 4 °C for 3 h after 16 h of treatment with (bullet ) or without (open circle ) 750 µM SNAP. Specific binding of TNFalpha was calculated as the difference between the binding in the presence and absence of excess unlabeled TNFalpha . B, hepatocytes were pretreated with different concentrations of SNAP for 16 h and stimulated with TNFalpha (500 units/ml) for 1 h. Nuclear extract preparation and electromobility shift assay were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." In competition experiments, excess unlabeled NF-kappa B oligomer (cold probe, CP) was added. C, for NF-kappa B promoter activity, hepatocytes were transfected with NF-kappa B luciferase reporter plasmid, treated with or without 750 µM SNAP, and then stimulated with TNFalpha (500 units/ml) for 6 h. Cell lysates were isolated and assayed for luciferase activity assay.
[View Larger Version of this Image (18K GIF file)]


SNAP Pretreatment or Heat Inhibits ROI Formation and Lipid Peroxidation

TNFalpha cytotoxicity is associated with overproduction of activated oxygens (Obardot 2 and H2O2) from the mitochondrial respiratory chain (46). Therefore, we next examined whether SNAP pretreatment inhibited TNFalpha -induced ROI formation as measured by the oxidation of the cell-permeable fluoregenic marker DCF-DA. TNFalpha exposure enhanced ROI-induced oxidation of DCF-DA in untreated hepatocytes, whereas pretreatment with SNAP or heat shock significantly reduced the TNFalpha -induced oxidation of DCF-DA (Fig. 10A). Antisense oligomers of HSP70 prevented the effect of SNAP on DCF oxidation.


Fig. 10. Effects of SNAP and heat shock on TNFalpha -induced ROI generation (A) and lipid peroxidation (B). A, hepatocytes were pretreated as described in Fig. 8. Cells were incubated with 100 µM DCF-DA with or without TNFalpha +ActD, or the equivalent amount of solvent for 80 min. Cells were washed with PBS, harvested, and fluorescence determined in a spectrophotofluorimeter (excitation: 488 nm; emission: 520 nm). Fluorescent values were normalized to the number of cells. B, lipid peroxidation was assayed by measuring TBARS at 550 nm after boiling the cell suspension with thiobarbituric acid solution in the presence of butylated hydroxytoluene (0.04%) for 30 min. *, p < 0.05 versus non-pretreatment.
[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]


Lipid peroxidation is another indicator of cellular damage by TNFalpha and is detected earlier than DNA fragmentation (56). We next measured the formation of TBARS as an estimation of lipid peroxidation. TNFalpha increased TBARS in hepatocytes 5 h after treatment (Fig. 10B). However, pretreatment with SNAP or heat shock significantly attenuated lipid peroxidation, whereas the addition of HSP70 antisense oligonucleotide reversed the effect of SNAP on lipid peroxidation.

Cytoprotective Effect of Cytokine-induced NO

To determine whether endogenous NO could protect hepatocytes from TNFalpha toxicity, we examined TNFalpha cytotoxicity in hepatocytes induced to produce NO by cytokine exposure. When incubated with IFNgamma and IL-1beta , rat hepatocytes expressed NOS2 protein as confirmed by Western blot analysis (Fig. 11A) and produced NO as judged by the accumulation of stable end products of NO, nitrite and nitrate (Fig. 11B). NO synthesis was nearly completely inhibited by the NOS inhibitor NMA. Although total GSH levels (GSH+GSSG+GSNO) were unchanged in IFNgamma +IL-1beta -treated cells, intracellular GSNO and GSSG levels were elevated and GSH significantly reduced. This change was also reversed by NMA (Fig. 11C). Under these conditions, HSP70 protein levels were increased by IFNgamma +IL-1beta exposure and this increase was attenuated by NMA (Fig. 12A). When hepatocytes were subsequently exposed to TNFalpha +ActD, IFNgamma - and IL-1beta -stimulated hepatocytes were protected from both TNFalpha -induced DNA fragmentation (Fig. 12B) and cytotoxicity (Fig. 12C). The protective effects were inhibited by NMA.


Fig. 11. IFNgamma - and IL-1beta -induced NO production and formation of GSSG and GSNO in cultured rat hepatocytes. Hepatocytes were incubated with a cytokine mixture (CM) of IFNgamma (200 units/ml) and IL-1beta (200 units/ml) in the presence or absence of NMA for 18 h. NOS2 expression was analyzed by Western blot (A). Formation of nitrite and nitrate (NOx) was measured in the culture medium (B). GSSG and GSNO were measured by the GSH reductase recycling method (C). *, p < 0.01; **, p < 0.05 versus control.
[View Larger Version of this Image (19K GIF file)]



Fig. 12. Effects of cytokine-induced NO synthesis on HSP70 expression and TNFalpha cytotoxicity. Hepatocytes were stimulated with CM (200 units/ml IFNgamma and 200 units/ml IL-1beta ) for 28 h. HSP70 expression was determined by Western blot analysis (A). The cells were subsequently exposed to TNFalpha +ActD with or without 1.5 mM NMA. After 9 h of incubation, cytosolic DNA was extracted and DNA fragmentation was visualized following electrophoresis on an agarose gel (B). After 14 h of incubation, cell viability (C) was measured as described in Fig. 1. *, p < 0.01 versus unstimulated control; **, p < 0.05 versus CM stimulation.
[View Larger Version of this Image (37K GIF file)]



DISCUSSION

In the present study, we have shown that pretreatment with the NO-generating compound SNAP protects cultured rat hepatocytes from TNFalpha +ActD-induced cytotoxicity and apoptosis. Both time-course and dose-response studies revealed that induction of HSP70 mRNA and protein occurred in parallel to protection from TNFalpha +ActD-induced apoptosis. Antisense oligomers to HSP70, but not HSP70 sense nor HSC70 antisense oligomers, inhibited NO-induced HSP70 expression and rendered hepatocytes again susceptible to TNFalpha +ActD-induced apoptosis. Expression of HSP70 induced by hyperthermia also protected hepatocytes from TNFalpha +ActD cytotoxicity. SNAP pretreatment did not increase antioxidant enzyme activities, strongly suggesting that the protective effect of SNAP pretreatment was not due to enhanced cellular antioxidant capacity through these enzyme systems. Furthermore, the decomposition products of SNAP (1 mM), N-acetylpenicillamine (1 mM, the parent compound of SNAP), and 8-bromo-cGMP (500 µM) had no effect on HSP induction or the cytoprotection (data not shown), suggesting that NO liberated from SNAP was the mediator through a cGMP-independent mechanism. TNFalpha receptor binding and TNFalpha -mediated signal transduction in hepatocytes were unchanged, as analyzed by the specific binding of iodinated TNFalpha and NF-kappa B activation. Finally, endogenous NO formation following IFNgamma +IL-1beta exposure caused increased HSP70 expression and protection from TNFalpha +ActD-induced cytotoxicity. Thus, we conclude that one mechanism by which NO protects hepatocytes from TNFalpha -induced cytotoxicity is through the induction of HSP70.

The cytotoxic action of TNFalpha has been associated with the activation of phospholipase A2, the cytosolic release of ceramide, and the formation of ROI. Overproduction of ROI has been identified as a key component of apoptotic pathways involving activation of endogenous endonucleases (57) and direct DNA fragmentation (58). The potential importance of ROI in TNFalpha -induced cytotoxicity and apoptosis has been demonstrated in studies where overexpression of Mn-superoxide dismutase, radical scavengers, and inhibitors of mitochondrial electron transfer block TNFalpha toxicity (59). In our study, the levels of antioxidant enzymes, including superoxide dismutase, catalase, and GSH peroxidase, were not changed in hepatocytes following SNAP pretreatment. Furthermore, even though intracellular GSH levels were transiently suppressed by SNAP exposure, the levels had returned to base line by the time of TNFalpha exposure. Instead, SNAP pretreatment induced the expression of HSP70, which has been shown to have anti-apoptotic or cytoprotective effects against TNFalpha toxicity. Thus, it is likely that the preinduction of HSP70 by SNAP protected the cells from TNFalpha +ActD-mediated apoptosis.

NO can act as an antioxidant by scavenging Obardot 2 directly. Therefore, another possible explanation of our findings is that NO neutralized Obardot 2. This seems unlikely because the NO donor was added 16 h before the TNFalpha +ActD. Furthermore, no protective effect from DNA fragmentation was seen when hepatocytes were treated simultaneously with 750 µM SNAP and TNFalpha (data not shown). In fact, the protection from TNFalpha +ActD-induced apoptosis was not detected until 12 h following SNAP exposure. Because SNAP has a half-life of only about 4.5 h under our experimental conditions (data not shown), no SNAP-derived NO should remain at the time of TNFalpha treatment. We also could not detect the presence of possible delayed NO-generating sources in hepatocytes, such as GSNO (Fig. 4) or iron-nitrosyl complexes (data not shown) 16 h following SNAP pretreatment. In contrast to our findings, others have presented evidence that simultaneous NO production protects from apoptosis (30, 31). Thus, it is likely that the mechanism of NO-mediated protection varies depending on the cell type and the quantity, as well as the timing and duration, of NO exposure.

NO can have adverse effects on host survival, ranging from direct cellular cytotoxicity (28, 29) to the damage of cellular components leading to the mutagenesis (60). Therefore, it is not surprising that a high level of NO exposure induces protective stress responses. Although our observation that NO stimulates HSP70 expression in hepatocytes has not been shown before, Kim et al. (19) have reported previously that NO induces heme oxygenase, or HSP32, in rat hepatocytes. The increased expression of HSP32 protects the cells from subsequent toxic concentrations of NO (20). However, the inhibitor of HSP32, Sn-protoporphyrin, did not reverse the induction of HSP70 or the SNAP-induced protection from TNFalpha toxicity (data not shown). Thus, it is likely that HSP70 and HSP32 are both induced by NO exposure, but while HSP32 protects from oxidative injury, HSP70 protects against TNFalpha -induced apoptosis. Although the protection in both instances may involve antioxidant properties, it is likely that HSP32 and HSP70 protect through distinct mechanisms.

HSP70 is induced by several environmental stimuli such as free radicals, heat, heavy metals (61), serum-free culture media (62), and agents that modulate intracellular ratio of GSSG to GSH in hepatocytes (52, 53, 63). Van Remmen et al. (62) recently reported that the type of serum-free culture medium profoundly influenced the spontaneous induction of HSP70 and HSC70 in cultured rat hepatocytes. Incubation in L15 medium resulted in marked spontaneous induction associated with a decrease in the GSH/GSSH ratio, whereas incubation in Williams medium E had little effect on HSP expression. Here we used Williams medium E and serum and, in agreement with this previous study, found no spontaneous induction of HSP70. The mechanism by which NO stimulates the expression of HSP70 may involve the interaction of NO with thiol-containing molecules. Ample evidence exists to support the view that NO readily oxidizes low molecular weight thiols, forming S-nitrosothiols and disulfide. Of cellular low molecular weight thiols, glutathione is the most abundant as well as being one of the intracellular targets of NO. Here, pretreatment of hepatocytes with NO was shown to alter the redox state accompanied by oxidation of GSH and formation of GSNO (Fig. 4A). A GSH oxidizing agent (diamide) and a GSH alkylating agent (N-ethylmaleimide) both induced HSP70 mRNA, but a GSH synthesis inhibitor (buthionine sulfoximine) did not (Fig. 4B). In addition, we show here that hepatocytes stimulated to produce NO by cytokine exposure expressed HSP70 associated with an intracellular GSH redox change. This cellular effect was attenuated by the NOS inhibitor NMA, strongly indicating that, like SNAP, cytokine-induced endogenous NO is also capable of inducing HSP70 expression in vitro. It is worth noting that even in the presence of NMA there was still a significant increase in HSP70 induction, which may indicate cytokine-dependent, but NO-independent, up-regulation (64). Taken together, these results suggest that it is possible that induction of HSP70 could be regulated by GSH-dependent cellular redox changes in response to NO.

Although heat exposure can cause apoptosis, it has been shown that heat shock also induces resistance to a subsequent challenge of other apoptotic agents, including ROI, NO, and glucocorticoid in mouse thymocytes (65, 66), as well as serum withdrawal in neuroblastoma ND7 cells (67). HSPs may protect cells by acting as molecular chaperons, guiding the folding and trafficking of damaged proteins (68). Induction of HSP protects cells not only from damage due to heat but also from damage due to oxidative injury and cytokine-mediated cytotoxicity. We show here that both ROI production and lipid peroxidation are inhibited by SNAP-induced HSP70 expression. Jäättelä et al. (48) demonstrated that pretreatment of mouse fibrosarcoma cells (WEHI) with heat-protected cells from TNFalpha -induced cytolysis, and that the protective effect roughly correlated with the kinetics of HSP induction. Furthermore, only cells overexpressing HSP70 were found to be protected from both ROI- and TNFalpha -induced cytotoxicity, whereas overexpression of HSP27 protected only from exogenous ROI exposure but not TNFalpha cytotoxicity (49, 50). Recent data have shown that HSP may protect from TNFalpha toxicity by inhibiting the action of ROI on mitochondrial membrane potential (69). Inhibition of TNFalpha toxicity by SNAP pretreatment could occur through the inhibition of ROI production in mitochondria, preventing ROI-mediated alterations in mitochondrial membrane potential. This could prevent cytochrome c release, which is involved in apoptosis through activation of cysteine protease such as CPP32/Yama (70); however, since HSP70 is not a mitochondrial protein, it is unlikely that HSP70 acts directly as a mitochondrial antioxidant. HSP70 may instead block signal transduction to the mitochondria, resulting in the inhibition of mitochondrial ROI production by inhibiting either second lipid messenger(s) to mitochondria (61) or by preventing the interaction between the death domain of TNFalpha receptor and signal molecule(s) (71). Alternatively, it is also possible that HSP70 may enhance the chaperon-mediated import of precursor proteins into mitochondria which control mitochondrial function (72, 73, 74) leading to decreased ROI formation. Further experiments will be required to establish whether any of these mechanisms account for the protection from TNFalpha -mediated apoptosis.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants R01-GM-37753 and R01-GM-44100. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
   To whom correspondence should be addressed: W1503 Biomedical Science Tower, Dept. of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261. Tel.: 412-624-6724; Fax: 412-624-1172.
**   Recipient of the George H. A. Clowes, Jr., MD FACS, Memorial Research Career Development Award of the American College of Surgeons.
1    The abbreviations used are: NO, nitric oxide; NOS, nitric-oxide synthase; HSP70, inducible heat shock protein 70; HSC70, constitutive heat shock protein 70; TNFalpha , tumor necrosis factor-alpha ; ActD, actinomycin D; CM, cytokine mixture; IFNgamma , interferon-gamma; IL-1beta , interleukin-1beta ; NMA, NG-monomethyl-L-arginine; SNAP, S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine; GSH, glutathione; GSSG, oxidized glutathione; GSNO, S-nitrosoglutathione; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; Obardot 2, superoxide anion; ONOO-, peroxynitrite; DCF-DA, dichlorofluorescen diacetate; TBARS, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances; ROI, reactive oxygen intermediates.

Acknowledgment

We thank Debra Williams and Qi Wang for excellent technical assistance.


REFERENCES

  1. Reif, D. W. (1993) Neuroreport 4, 566-568 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Guo, F. H., De Raeve, H. R., Rice, T. W., Stuehr, D. J., Thunnissen, F. B., and Erzurum, S. C. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 7809-7813 [Abstract]
  3. Nathan, C., and Xie, Q. W. (1994) Cell 78, 915-918 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Son, K., and Kim, Y. M. (1995) Cancer Res. 55, 5524-5527 [Abstract]
  5. Gianotti, L., Alexander, J. W., Pyles, T., and Fukushima, R. (1993) Ann. Surg. 217, 644-653 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Molina y Vedia, L., McDonald, B., Reep, B., Brune, B., Di Silvio, M., Billiar, T. R., and Lapetina, E. G. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 24929-24932 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Lander, H. M., Ogiste, J. S., Pearce, S. F. A., Levi, R., and Novogrodsky, A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 7017-7020 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Lancaster, J. R., Jr., and Hibbs, J. B., Jr. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 1223-1227 [Abstract]
  9. Ignarro, L. J. (1989) Semin. Hematol. 26, 63-76 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Stamler, J. S. (1994) Cell 78, 931-936 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Ischiropoulos, H., Zhu, L., Chen, J., Tsai, M., Martin, J. C., Smith, C. D., and Beckman, J. S. (1992) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 298, 431-437 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Hausladen, A., and Fridovich, I. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 29405-29408 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Castro, L., Rodriguez, M., and Radi, R. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 29409-29415 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Bautista, A. P., and Spitzer, J. J. (1994) Am. J. Physiol. 266, G783-G788 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Kanner, J., Harel, S., and Granit, R. (1991) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 289, 130-136 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Rubbo, H., Radi, R., Trujillo, M., Telleri, R., Kalyanaraman, B., Barnes, S., Kirk, M., and Freeman, B. A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 26066-26075 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Geller, D. A., Nussler, A. K., Di Silvio, M., Lowenstein, C. J., Shapiro, R. A., Wang, S. C., Simmons, R. L., and Billiar, T. R. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 522-526 [Abstract]
  18. Geller, D. A., de Vera, M. E., Russell, D. A., Shapiro, R. A., Nussler, A. K., Simmons, R. L., and Billiar, T. R. (1995) J. Immunol. 155, 4890-4896 [Abstract]
  19. Kim, Y. M., Bergonia, H. A., Muller, C., Pitt, B. R., Watkins, W. D., and Lancaster, J. R., Jr. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 5710-5713 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Kim, Y. M., Bergonia, H., and Lancaster, J. R., Jr. (1995) FEBS Lett. 374, 228-232 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Harbrecht, B. G., Stadler, J., Demetris, A. J., Simmons, R. L., and Billiar, T. R. (1994) Am. J. Physiol. 266, G1004-G1010 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Harbrecht, B. G., Billiar, T. R., Stadler, J., Demetris, A. J., Ochoa, J., Curran, R. D., and Simmons, R. L. (1992) J. Leukoc. Biol. 52, 390-394 [Abstract]
  23. Chiao, H., Foster, S., Thomas, R., Lipton, J., and Star, R. A. (1996) J. Clin. Invest. 97, 2038-2044 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Leist, M., Gantner, F., Bohlinger, I., Germann, P. G., Tiegs, G., and Wendel, A. (1994) J. Immunol. 153, 1778-1788 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Hewett, J. A., Jean, P. A., Kunkel, S. L., and Roth, R. A. (1993) Am. J. Physiol. 265, G1011-G1015 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Harbrecht, B. G., Di Silvio, M., Demetris, A. J., Simmons, R. L., and Billiar, T. R. (1994) Hepatology 20, 1055-1060 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Leist, M., Gantner, F., Bohlinger, I., Tiegs, G., Germann, P. G., and Wendel, A. (1995) Am. J. Pathol. 146, 1220-1234 [Abstract]
  28. Fehsel, K., Kroncke, K.-D., Meyer, K. L., Huber, H., Wahn, V., and Kolb-Bachofen, V. (1995) J. Immunol. 155, 2858-2865 [Abstract]
  29. Terenzi, F., Diaz-Guerra, M. J. M., Casado, M., Hortelano, S., Leoni, S., and Bosca, L. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 6017-6021 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Matthys, P., Froyen, G., Verdot, L., Huang, S., Sobis, H., Van Damme, J., Vray, B., Aguet, M., and Billiau, A. (1995) J. Immunol. 155, 3823-3829 [Abstract]
  31. Mannick, J. B., Asano, K., Izumi, K., Kieff, E., and Stamler, J. S. (1994) Cell 79, 1137-1146 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. 249250Field, L., Dilts, R. V., Ravichandran, R., Lenhert, P. G., and Carnahan, G. E. (1978) J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 249-250
  33. Saville, B. (1958) Analyst 83, 670-672
  34. Mestril, R., Chi, S. H., Sayen, M. R., and Dillmann, W. H. (1994) Biochem. J. 298, 561-569 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Sorger, P. K., and Pelham, H. R. (1987) EMBO J. 6, 993-998 [Abstract]
  36. Seglen, P. O. (1976) Methods Cell. Biol. 13, 29-83 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Nussler, A. K., Liu, Z. Z., Di Silvio, M., Sweetland, M. A., Geller, D. A., Lancaster, J. R., Jr., Billiar, T. R., Freeswick, P. D., Lowenstein, C. L., and Simmons, R. L. (1994) Am. J. Physiol. 267, C394-C401 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Wheeler, C. R., Salzman, J. A., Elsayed, N. M., Omaye, S. T., and Korte, D. W., Jr. (1990) Anal. Biochem. 184, 193-199 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Fernandez, A., Kiefer, J., Fosdick, L., and McConkey, D. J. (1995) J. Immunol. 155, 5133-5139 [Abstract]
  40. Buege, J. A., and Aust, S. D. (1987) Methods Enzymol. 52, 302-310
  41. Baker, M. A., Cerniglia, G. J., and Zaman, A. (1990) Anal. Biochem. 190, 360-365 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Clancy, R. M., Levartovsky, D., Leszczynska-Piziak, J., Yegudin, J., and Abramson, S. B. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 3680-3684 [Abstract]
  43. Staal, F. J. T., Roederer, M., Herzenberg, L., and Herzenberg, L. A. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 9943-9947 [Abstract]
  44. de Vera, M. E., Shapiro, R. A., Nussler, A. K., Mudgett, J. S., Simmons, R. L., Morris, S. M., Jr., Billiar, T. R., and Geller, D. A. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 1054-1059 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Mehlen, P., Preville, X., Chareyron, P., Briolay, J., Klemenz, R., and Arrigo, A. P. (1995) J. Immunol. 154, 363-374 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Schulze-Osthoff, K., Bakker, A. C., Vanhaesebroeck, B., Beyaert, R., Jacob, W. A., and Fiers, W. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 5317-5323 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Wong, G. H., and Goeddel, D. V. (1988) Science 242, 941-944 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Jäättelä, M., Saksela, K., and Saksela, E. (1989) Eur. J. Immunol. 19, 1413-1417 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Jäättelä, M., Wissing, D., Bauer, P. A., and Li, G. C. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 3507-3512 [Abstract]
  50. Jäättelä, M., and Wissing, D. (1993) J. Exp. Med. 177, 231-236 [Abstract]
  51. Blake, M. J., Gershon, J., Fargnoli, J., and Holbrook, N. J. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 15275-15279 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Huang, L. E., Zhang, H., Bae, S. W., and Liu, A. Y.-C. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 30718-30725 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Aucoin, M. M., Barhoumi, R., Kochevar, D. T., Granger, H. J., and Burghardt, R. C. (1995) Am. J. Physiol. 268, H1651-H1658 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Yamauchi, N., Kuriyama, H., Watanabe, N., Neda, H., Maeda, M., and Niitsu, Y. (1989) Cancer Res. 49, 1671-1675 [Abstract]
  55. Slater, A. F., Kimland, M., Jiang, S. A., and Orrenius, S. (1995) Biochem. J. 312, 833-838 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. Hockenbery, D. M., Oltvai, Z. N., Yin, X. M., Milliman, C. L., and Korsmeyer, S. J. (1993) Cell 75, 241-251 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  57. Fernandez, A., Kiefer, J., Fosdick, L., and McConkey, D. J. (1995) J. Immunol. 155, 5133-5139 [Abstract]
  58. Mertens, J. J., Gibson, N. W., Lau, S. S., and Monks, T. J. (1995) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 320, 51-58 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  59. Wong, G. H., Elwell, J. H., Oberley, L. W., and Goeddel, D. V. (1989) Cell 58, 923-931 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  60. Wink, D. A., Kasprzak, K. S., Maragos, C. M., Elespuru, R. K., Misra, M., Dunams, T. M., Cebula, T. A., Koch, W. H., Andrews, A. W., Allen, J. S., and Keefer, L. K. (1991) Science 254, 1001-1003 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  61. Jacquier-Sarlin, M. R., Fuller, K., Dinh-Xuan, A. T., Richard, M. J., and Polla, B. S. (1994) Experientia (Basel) 50, 1031-1038 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  62. Van Remmen, H., Williams, M. D., Heydari, A. R., Takahashi, R., Chung, H. Y., Yu, B. P., and Richardson, A. (1996) J. Cell. Physiol. 166, 453-460 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  63. Saunders, E. L., Maines, M. D., Meredith, M. J., and Freeman, B. A. (1991) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 288, 368-373 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  64. Helqvist, S., Polla, B. S., Johannesen, J., and Nerup, J. (1991) Diabetologia 34, 150-156 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  65. Fehsel, K., Kroncke, K.-D., Meyer, K. L., Huber, H., Wahn, V., and Kolb-Bachofen, V. (1995) J. Immunol. 155, 2858-2865 [Abstract]
  66. Migliorati, G., Nicoletti, I., Crocicchio, F., Pagliacci, C., Adamio, F. D., and Riccardi, C. (1992) Cell. Immunol. 143, 348-356 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  67. Mailhos, C., Howard, M. K., and Latchman, D. S. (1993) Neuroscience 55, 621-627 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  68. Minowada, G., and Welch, W. J. (1995) J. Clin. Invest. 95, 3-12 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  69. Cossarizza, A., Cooper, E. L., Quaglino, D., Salvioli, S., Kalachnikova, G., and Franceschi, C. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 214, 503-510 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  70. Liu, X., Kim, C. N., Yang, J., Jemmerson, R., and Wang, X. (1996) Cell 86, 147-157 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  71. Hsu, H., Xiong, J., and Goeddel, D. V. (1995) Cell 81, 495-504 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  72. Harkness, T. A. A., Nargang, F. E., van der Klei, I., Neupert, W., and Lill, R. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 124, 637-648 [Abstract]
  73. Baker, K. P., Schaniel, A., Vestweber, D., and Schatz, G. (1990) Nature 348, 605-609 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  74. Hönlinger, A., Kübrich, M., Moczko, M., Gärtner, F., Mallet, L., Bussereau, F., Eckerskorn, C., Lottspeich, F., Dietmeier, K., Jacquet, M., and Pfanner, N. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 3382-3389 [Abstract]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.