Reversible Calcium-dependent Interaction of Liposomes with Pulmonary Surfactant Protein A
ANALYSIS BY RESONANT MIRROR TECHNIQUE AND NEAR-INFRARED LIGHT SCATTERING*

(Received for publication, February 18, 1997, and in revised form, March 27, 1997)

Astrid Meyboom , Dieter Maretzki , Paul A. Stevens Dagger and Klaus Peter Hofmann §

From the Institut für Medizinische Physik und Biophysik and the Dagger  Abteilung Neonatologie, Universitätsklinikum Charité, Humboldt Universität, D-10098 Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Surfactant protein A (SP-A) is crucial for lung function, including tubular myelin formation and lipid uptake by type II pneumocytes. Known properties of SP-A in vitro are its Ca2+-dependent interaction with phospholipids and its role in the aggregation of liposomes. To dissect and to analyze these processes, we have immobilized SP-A and measured binding of liposomes by the resonant mirror technique. Liposome aggregation was followed separately by kinetic light scattering in suspensions. It was found that SP-A-mediated binding and aggregation of liposomes have a common K0.5 of 20 µM for free Ca2+, independent of the species (sheep, rat, or cow) and of the phospholipid composition, and that both reactions exhibit the same high cooperativity (Hill coefficients of 6-9) for Ca2+ ions. However, binding of liposomes to SP-A is >10-fold faster than aggregation. Both processes are completely reversed by low Ca2+ concentrations, but liposomes dissociate from SP-A in <0.3 s, whereas disaggregation of the liposomes takes ~30 s. At equilibrium, the level of aggregation depends on the concentration of free SP-A. We interpret these results to be a rapid and reversible sequence of three reactions: (i) a cooperative Ca2+-dependent conformational change in SP-A, (ii) binding of Ca2+-bound SP-A to liposomes, and (iii) aggregation of the Ca2+/SP-A-bound liposomes.


INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary surfactant stabilizes the lung by regulating the surface tension of the alveoli. A key element is thereby the formation of a surface monolayer of phospholipids, mainly dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine, which lowers surface tension. The monolayer is generated from an "aqueous" compartment, the extracellular alveolar hypophase, which contains surfactant lipids in high concentration and surfactant proteins A, B, C, and D (1). Lamellar bodies, tubular myelin, and liposomes within the hypophase are thought to be precursors of the monomolecular surface film (2). Surfactant protein A (SP-A)1 is the major protein in the alveolar compartment. In vivo, it is tightly associated with lipids (3). SP-A is an octadecamer of ~650 kDa. Its oligomeric structure is formed by identical monomers of ~28-36 kDa, which appear to be heterogeneous on SDS-polyacrylamide gels due to a different content of carbohydrate chains. The subunits are organized in six trimers, each of which forms a helical structure, mediated by the hydroxyproline-rich collagen-like domain of the SP-A subunit (4, 5).

SP-A belongs to the lectin family of calcium-binding proteins. Each subunit contains the characteristic structural element of a carboxyl-terminal carbohydrate recognition domain. Recent studies support a role of the carbohydrate recognition domain in phospholipid aggregation that is distinct from phospholipid binding (6). The neck region of SP-A, which links the collagen-like and carbohydrate recognition domains, is mainly involved in phospholipid binding (1, 7, 8). An interesting specificity of SP-A is reflected by its high affinity for phosphatidylcholine and preferentially the main lung lipid dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (1, 9). Interaction of SP-A with dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine and surfactant lipid vesicles appears to require extracellular levels of calcium (10). In vitro, calcium concentrations in the range of 0.5-5 mM have been shown to induce aggregation (11). This SP-A-mediated surfactant lipid aggregation is thought to play an important role in the phospholipid organization of the alveolar fluid and in surfactant lipid exchange in type II pneumocytes.

Lipid binding to SP-A facilitates the uptake of liposomes by type II cells via receptor-mediated endocytosis (12). The intracellular compartment of these cells contains lamellar bodies. Surfactant is stored in these specialized organelles and secreted in the alveolar fluid by exocytosis. SP-A also mediates an inhibition of surfactant secretion (13). In view of these functions, SP-A appears to have properties for binding, transport, release, and even sorting of phospholipids in the different compartments with their various structural organizations of pulmonary surfactant lipids.

This biophysical study, carried out with purified SP-A, provides a building block for understanding these functions. It demonstrates that SP-A controls the level of aggregated phospholipid in a calcium-dependent manner. The results suggest a specific system of coupled reversible reactions. The key element is a Ca2+-dependent, highly cooperative conformational change in the protein, which enables SP-A to bind to liposomes and to induce liposome aggregation. Ca2+ sensitivity, reaction times, and reversibility of lipid binding to SP-A and liposome aggregation are compatible with physiological functions of SP-A.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Purification of SP-A

Pulmonary surfactant and SP-A were isolated from bronchoalveolar lavage of bovine, rat, or sheep lungs according to the method of Hawgood et al. (10). Briefly, surfactant was isolated from lung lavage by different centrifugation steps, including a NaBr density gradient. Afterward, SP-A was delipidated with 1-butanol. Repeated extractions with octyl glycopyranoside-containing buffer were followed by dialysis against 5 mM Tris, pH 7.4, and centrifugation. The protein content was determined using the Bio-Rad protein assay and bovine serum albumin as protein standard. The purity of the SP-A preparation was assessed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis according to Laemmli (14).

Liposome Preparation

All lipids used were obtained from Sigma. Phospholipid mixtures in CH3OH/CHCl3 (1:2) consisting of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine/egg phosphatidylcholine/phosphatidylglycerol/cholesterol (55:25:10:10) were dried under vacuum using a Speed Vac system (Eppendorf Gmbh, Germany) and stored at -40 °C.

Lipid films were hydrated in 5 mM Tris, pH 7.4, containing 100 mM NaCl and 50 µM EGTA to a phospholipid concentration of 10 mg/ml. Samples were sonicated 8 × 15 s at 50 °C with a Bandelin Sonoplus BM 70 disintegrator. Multilamellar liposomes were obtained by 10 repeated freeze-thaw cycles. They were extruded through a polycarbonate membrane of defined pore size (200 nm) using a Lipo-Fast extrusion set. Liposomes produced by extrusion are unilamellar as described previously (15).

Spectrophotometric Assays

Liposome aggregation was monitored at 400 nm by measurement of turbidity changes using a diode array spectrophotometer (Hewlett-Packard, Waldbronn, Germany). Liposomes, prepared as described above, were dissolved in a glass cuvette containing 5 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl, and 50 µM EGTA, pH 7.4, to a final concentration of 10 µg/ml. 5 µg/ml SP-A was added. After equilibration, aggregation of SP-A was observed upon addition of 2.5 mM Ca2+.

NIR Light Scattering

Light scattering changes monitoring SP-A-induced liposome aggregation were measured using a steady 820-nm incident beam and were detected at an angular range of 16 ± 2° as described (16-18). Different SP-A and liposome concentrations in a final volume of 300 µl (10-mm microcuvette; 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM Tris, and 50 µM EGTA, pH 7.4) were used. Reactions were started by adding micromolar levels of Ca2+, and light scattering changes were continuously recorded.

To investigate a light scattering particle with the refractive index and size of the liposomes (200-nm diameter, smaller than the wavelength of the incident beam), one can apply the Rayleigh-Debye approximation of scattered intensity, I(theta ) ~ ((n/n0)2 - 1)·V2·P2(theta )·(1 + cos2theta ), where n and n0 denote the refractive indices of the scattering particle and of the buffered saline, respectively; V is the particle volume; and P2(theta ) is a particle scattering function that depends on the shape of the particle.

Under the conditions of these measurements and for small aggregates, the scattered intensity is dominated by the V2 term (16), and the intensity of the scattered light (IS) is to a first approximation proportional to the square of the particle volume, V2. Formation of aggregates of N particles each will increase scattering in proportion to N2 and, at the same time, reduce the total number of scattering particles in proportion to 1/N. Thus, the time-dependent change in scattered intensity (Delta IS) seen in the Ca2+-induced SP-A-dependent aggregation signals (see "Results") reflects the increase in the average number of liposomes/aggregate.

Control experiments were performed without one of the following in the NIR light scattering assay: SP-A, liposomes, or calcium. Under the experimental conditions used, no significant signals were observed if one component was omitted.

Resonant Mirror Spectroscopy

Experiments were performed using an IAsys FPC-0001 instrument (Affinity Sensors, Cambridge, United Kingdom). SP-A was coupled to the aminosilane surface of the cuvette using the homobifunctional cross-linker bis(sulfosuccinimidyl) suberate. Coupling was carried out in 10 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.7. The buffer was exchanged in Microcon separation kits (Amicon, Inc.). After immobilization of SP-A, the remaining binding sites were blocked with 1 M ethanolamine, pH 8.5. Signals were obtained using 100 µl of liposome solution in 100 mM NaCl, 50 µM EGTA, and 5 mM Tris, pH 7.4, with the addition of a small sample volume of Ca2+ from different stock solutions (100:10:1 mM). Cuvettes were washed with 10 mM EDTA, 0.1% Tween 20, and 5 mM Tris, pH 7.4, and with 100 mM NaCl and 5 mM Tris, pH 7.4, with or without EGTA, depending on the experiment.


RESULTS

Rate and Reversibility of SP-A/Liposome Interaction

To investigate the interaction of lipids with SP-A, liposome binding to immobilized SP-A and their release were studied by the resonant mirror technique. The aggregation of liposomes by SP-A was assayed using the kinetic NIR light scattering method (16). The two methods enabled us to distinguish between the binding of liposomes to SP-A (Fig. 1A) and the SP-A-mediated aggregation of the liposomes (Fig. 1B).


Fig. 1. Reversibility of SP-A/liposome interaction probed by resonant mirror spectroscopy (A) and NIR light scattering (B). A, 640 µM lipids in 100 mM NaCl (containing an impurity of 20 µM Ca2+; see "Results"), 50 µM EGTA, and 5 mM Tris, pH 7.4, interacted with ~33 ng (0.05 pmol) of coupled bovine SP-A after the addition of 50 µM Ca2+. The stepwise addition of 10 µM EGTA led to a release of liposome binding within <1 s (see inset). B, 1350 µM lipids in 100 mM NaCl, 50 µM EGTA, 5 mM Tris, pH 7.4, and 12.3 nM sheep SP-A aggregated after the addition of 50 µM Ca2+. The signal was completely reversible after complexion of Ca2+ by EDTA. Half-disaggregation occurred after 18.6 s (see inset).
[View Larger Version of this Image (12K GIF file)]

Binding of Liposomes to Immobilized SP-A

Fig. 1A shows changes in refractive index within the sensitive layer on the surface of the resonant mirror apparatus. These sensorgrams, measured in units of arc seconds (arc s), reflect changes during calcium-dependent binding or release of liposomes to SP-A bound to the surface chip. It is shown that the addition of Ca2+ leads to a binding signal, indicating transfer of liposomes to immobilized SP-A.

The addition of EGTA during the rising phase of the binding signal (Fig. 1A) produces rapid negative deflections, indicating partial dissociation of the liposomes. The first two additions maintain the full amplitude of the resonant mirror signal of SP-A-bound liposomes, presumably due to free Ca2+ still available. The subsequent back-titration of Ca2+ dissociates the liposomes from SP-A very rapidly, as seen in the dramatic drop of the resonant mirror signal. Full complexation of Ca2+ with equimolar amounts of EGTA recovers the base-line signal. The binding reaction is fully reversible.

Fig. 1A (inset) displays the downward deflection of the resonant mirror signal in real time recording. The measured dissociation of 0.3 s is an upper limit of the actual reaction time since the time resolution of the instrument is in this order of magnitude.

Sensorgrams obtained upon coupling of SP-A on the sensor chip were reproducible for liposome binding in nine immobilization experiments. Minor alterations of base-line levels did occur, probably caused by nonspecific liposome interaction on the surface of the sensor chip. After SP-A complex formation under saturating conditions of liposomes, the addition of SP-A and/or more Ca2+ did not change the resonant mirror signal. The affinity sensor monitors changes in the refractive index limited to a surface thickness of ~200 nm. The observations indicate that liposome aggregation does not interfere with the binding signal from surface-localized SP-A. Neither empty cuvettes without bound SP-A nor heat-denatured SP-A produced any liposome binding signal.

Although one can never exclude an influence on the binding kinetics, immobilization of proteins has been applied to a number of investigation purposes. However, precise and rapid Ca2+-dependent liposome binding and its complete reversibility strongly suggest that the SP-A function is maintained after immobilization on the sensor surface. The measured rates are likely to be lower limits for the actual reaction rates in free solution due to limited accessibility of the protein on the sensor surface.

SP-A-mediated Aggregation of Liposomes

Aggregation manifests itself in a change in light scattering (see "Experimental Procedures"). The data in Fig. 1B are from a typical experiment, with the SP-A/liposome interaction started by addition of Ca2+. The amplitude of the scattering signal (Delta IS) is the recorded intensity change (in volts) at the detector output. The signal arises predominantly from the gain of particle volume by Ca2+-induced, SP-A-mediated liposome aggregation. Controls performed without SP-A or Ca2+ did not show any light scattering changes.

The addition of calcium chelators (EDTA or EGTA) during the rise of the signal sets the scattering intensity back to the starting value. As was observed for SP-A binding, partial titration of free Ca2+ reduces the aggregation only partially, and a subsequent second addition of excess Ca2+ elicits again a full aggregation signal (data not shown). These results indicate that, in a certain range of Ca2+ concentrations, the equilibrium level of SP-A-mediated liposome aggregation is sensitive to free Ca2+. The aggregation is completely reversible, with a half-time of complete reversal of aggregation (which we may term "disaggregation") on the order of 18 s (see Fig. 1B, inset).

Influence of Lipid Concentration

Fig. 2A shows sensorgrams that were obtained when the amount of liposomes in the cuvette was varied. Again, binding to immobilized SP-A was measured. The amount of liposomes is expressed in units of phospholipid concentration. The sensorgrams generally consist of two phases, namely a rapid association phase and a subsequent slower phase. Two exponential functions are sufficient to fit the two phases of the binding signals (Table I). They can be understood as the initial occupation of free binding sites on surface-bound SP-A and a slower equilibration. The initial fast phase takes only a few seconds.


Fig. 2. Effect of different liposome concentrations in resonant mirror spectroscopy (A) and NIR light scattering (B). Approximately 55 ng of coupled rat SP-A (A) or 4.5 nM rat SP-A (B) were incubated with different lipid concentrations in 100 mM NaCl, 50 µM EGTA, and 5 mM Tris, pH 7.4. Reactions were started by addition of 90 or 50 µM Ca2+. Signals were fitted by two (A) or one (B) exponential function, respectively. Fit values are shown in Tables I and II.
[View Larger Version of this Image (14K GIF file)]

Table I. Influence of lipid concentration on SP-A-induced liposome binding and aggregation: resonance mirror technique

Fit: f(t) = (A1 · (1 - exp(-k1 · t))) + (A2 · (1 - exp(-k2 · t))), where A1 and A2 = amplitudes of the first and second phases and k1 and k2 = rate constants of the first and second phases.

Lipid conc A1 k1 A2 k2 Liposome conc SP-A/liposome

µM (arc s) s-1 (arc s) s-1 nM
160 337 0.0449 431 0.0029 0.32 2.7
320 407 0.0751 310 0.0054 0.64 1.3
640 515 0.1050 269 0.0061 1.28 0.7
1280 587 0.1719 234 0.0082 2.56 0.33
2560 668 0.1925 180 0.0095 5.12 0.17

Each record is from a new sample, started with the same amount of Ca2+. The resonant mirror signal increases with the concentration of the liposomes, which can be approximately taken from the concentration of lipid, the space occupied by one lipid molecule in a bilayer (0.5 nm2), and the diameter of liposomes on the order of 200 nm. Sensorgrams were analyzed by the equation given in the legend to Table I. The initial reaction rate (kon) depends only slightly on liposome concentration (4-fold change for 16-fold change in liposome concentration). Table I shows also that the total amplitude of both phases is almost independent of liposome concentration, indicating that all available SP-A-binding sites are finally occupied.

The NIR light scattering signals (Fig. 2B) of SP-A-mediated liposome aggregation were obtained under similar conditions. At constant SP-A and Ca2+ concentrations, aggregation depends on lipid concentration. With increasing concentrations of lipid present, SP-A binding and aggregation rates are higher, and the equilibrium between aggregation and disaggregation is shifted toward the aggregated state.

The time course of the scattering signals fits well to a single exponential function see Table II. Again, kon varies only slightly with the lipid concentration (4-fold change for 16-fold change in lipid). Generally and at any concentration of the lipid, binding to SP-A (Fig. 2A) is much faster than SP-A-mediated liposome aggregation (Fig. 2B).

Table II. Influence of lipid concentration on SP-A-induced liposome binding and aggregation: NIR light scattering

Fit: f(x) = A · (1 - exp(-k · t)), where A = amplitudes and k = rate constants.

Lipid conc A k Liposome conc SP-A/liposome

µM V s-1 nM
80 2.72 0.0005 0.16 28
160 3.81 0.0009 0.32 14
320 4.56 0.0011 0.64 7
640 4.20 0.0015 1.28 3.5
1280 4.30 0.0021 2.56 1.8

The estimated volumetric equivalent concentration of SP-A in the resonant mirror cuvette, as calculated from the amount of SP-A coupled on the surface of the sensor chip and the cuvette volume, is on the order of 1 nM. The light scattering experiments employed 4.5 nM SP-A. Thus, although the SP-A concentration in the resonant mirror experiments was lower (one-fifth), the kon of the binding signals was at least an order of magnitude higher than that of aggregation. This is consistent with fast binding between SP-A and liposomes, followed by slower aggregation.

Influence of SP-A Concentration

Higher SP-A levels in the liposome NIR scattering experiments give rise to higher aggregation signals. Fig. 3 shows light scattering signals at constant Ca2+ and lipid concentrations. It is shown that the rate and extent of aggregation depend on the concentration of SP-A, indicating that the SP-A bound after a short time (see Figs. 1A and 2A) governs the aggregation process. The amplitude and kon value of liposome aggregation rise in proportion to the amount of SP-A present. kon values become higher because the more SP-A is present, the faster SP-A·liposome complexes are formed. Different amplitudes reflect that size and/or number of liposome aggregates depends on the amount of SP-A in solution. Analogous observations were made with SP-A from different species (rat, sheep, and cow).


Fig. 3. Effect of different SP-A concentrations on aggregation monitored by NIR light scattering. Different concentrations of sheep SP-A reacted with 640 µM lipids after the addition of 50 µM Ca2+. Signals were fitted by exponential functions with the parameters shown in Table III.
[View Larger Version of this Image (18K GIF file)]

Calcium Dependence of SP-A/Liposome Interaction

In Fig. 4 (A and B), the dependence on Ca2+ of liposome binding to SP-A and aggregation is plotted. The original concentration in the saline buffer (typically 20 µM) was measured spectrophotometrically, using arsenazo III (19). Ca2+ was first adjusted to a low initial concentration by EGTA (50 µM). Each point represents the signal amplitude 200 or 400 s after the addition of the respective amount of Ca2+.


Fig. 4. Resonant mirror (A) and NIR light scattering (B) signals dependent on Ca2+ concentration. Bovine SP-A (~35 ng of coupled or 5 nM free SP-A) was incubated with 640 µM lipids in 100 mM NaCl, 50 µM EGTA, and 5 mM Tris, pH 7.4. The signals at 200 s (A) and 400 s (B) after the addition of Ca2+ are plotted against the added Ca2+ concentration. Points were fitted using the Hill equation with the parameters shown in Table IV.
[View Larger Version of this Image (10K GIF file)]

Liposome binding and aggregation start to be visible in the same range of Ca2+ concentrations added. This is consistent with the conclusion reached above that aggregation is dependent on and follows SP-A/lipid association induced by micromolar Ca2+. It does not exclude an additional influence of Ca2+ at higher concentrations: the aggregation process by itself may well depend on high Ca2+ concentrations as described previously (10, 20, 21).

Cooperativity of Liposome Binding to SP-A

The data in Fig. 4 demonstrate that SP-A does not interact with liposomes at low free Ca2+ concentrations. Within a narrow range of concentration, the addition of Ca2+ starts to induce the structural transitions reflected in the SP-A-dependent interactions, indicating a cooperative mode of SP-A action in both binding and aggregation. We conclude that SP-A exists in (at least) two states, namely a calcium-depleted form that does not interact with liposomes and one or several interacting forms that bind calcium cooperatively.

To obtain more quantitative information, the coupled SP-A on the aminosilane surface of the resonant mirror offers the possibility of a treatment with high concentrations of EGTA to reduce the Ca2+ bound to SP-A to a great extent. The actual concentration of free Ca2+ can then be estimated after Ca2+ determination in buffer and known addition of EGTA and Ca2+. Fig. 5 is a plot of the resulting levels of lipid binding depending on free Ca2+. The Hill coefficient, based on a computer fit to the data, was on the order of 6-9 (see Table IV), and K0.5 was ~20 µM free Ca2+ for all species investigated (sheep, rat, and cow; data not shown).


Fig. 5. 15 ng of coupled sheep SP-A were washed with EGTA and incubated with 640 µM lipids in 100 mM NaCl, 50 µM EGTA, and 5 mM Tris, pH 7.4. Reaction signals at 200 s after the addition of Ca2+ are plotted against the free Ca2+ concentration in solution (calculated from the known Ca2+ concentration of buffer without EGTA, EGTA concentration, and added Ca2+ concentrations). Points were fitted using the Hill equation with the parameters shown in Table IV.
[View Larger Version of this Image (14K GIF file)]

Table IV. Calculation of Hill coefficients and K0.5 values for Ca2+ cooperativity of SP-A

Fit: f = (A · (Ca2+)n)/((Ca2+)n + K0.5n), where A = amplitudes and n = Hill coefficients.

Resonant mirror, added Ca2+ NIR light scattering, added Ca2+ Resonant mirror, free Ca2+

A 865  ± 13 (arc s) 4.5  ± 0.14 (relative units) 408  ± 5.16 (arc s)
n 8.8  ± 1.2 5.5  ± 0.62 7.2  ± 0.47
K0.5M) 40  ± 0.6 62.7  ± 1.15 22  ± 3.0


DISCUSSION

In this study, we have analyzed the functions of SP-A. The biophysical techniques applied enabled us to differentiate between its Ca2+-dependent interaction with phospholipids and its role in the aggregation of liposomes. Both these processes are closely coupled in situ. Our analysis shows how they are concatenated as two partial steps of one Ca2+-dependent overall process.

Liposome Binding to SP-A

We used immobilized SP-A to monitor the binding and release of liposomes to and from the protein by changes in the refractive index at an affinity sensor surface (binding signals). Binding of liposomes to SP-A occurs upon addition of Ca2+ concentrations in the micromolar range (K0.5 = 22 ± 3 µM free Ca2+). The association rate constants (kon) rise in proportion to the lipid concentration, which is consistent with a mechanism of collisional coupling between liposomes and immobilized SP-A (Fig. 2A and Table I). Successful coupling requires a Ca2+-dependent form of SP-A, presumably a specific conformation. We have also seen that removal of Ca2+, e.g. by addition of EGTA, switches SP-A back to an inactive form, leading to very rapid dissociation of liposomes. This Ca2+-dependent switch of the SP-A/liposome interaction operates in a wide range of phospholipid compositions and for SP-A from different species. The observed switch of the SP-A conformation fits well with a class of binding sites with KD on the order of 10 µM (22). Conformational changes in SP-A that result from Ca2+ binding in the absence of lipids were detected by fluorescence spectroscopy by Sohma et al. (23). They found increased fluorescence intensities of SP-A with half-maximal changes of ~60 µM Ca2+ added.

In terms of the subunit structure of SP-A, it is now an interesting question of how Ca2+ triggers the change in structure of SP-A that leads to the observed effect. Suggested regions for binding of lipid include the neck plus carbohydrate recognition domains of the SP-A subunits (6-8), which form a bouquet-like structure in the octadecamer (5).

Liposome Aggregation

Kinetic light scattering has revealed that liposome aggregation is similar in its Ca2+ dependence, but always lags behind the liposome binding reaction. Remarkably, the rise and equilibrium level of aggregation depend on the concentration of SP-A in the sample, which shows that the protein controls the aggregation process. Our results confirm that reversal of aggregation (disaggregation) of SP-A·liposome complexes can be achieved by the mere addition of EGTA or EDTA in excess of calcium concentrations, as reported by others (11, 22, 24). We have further seen that the decay of the aggregates is much delayed compared with the very rapid dissociation of the SP-A·liposome complex (18 s versus 0.3 s). This is consistent with a two-step mechanism in which the release of the SP-A/liposome interaction triggers disaggregation. It is interesting to estimate the average number of SP-A molecules/liposome for the aggregation data (Table III). Assuming that one SP-A molecule with a diameter of 20 nm (5) occupies an area of 300 nm2, it turns out that approximately two to four SP-A molecules/vesicle (125 × 103 nm2) allow a substantial aggregation (~50% of maximum), although only 1% of the vesicle surface (corresponding to 400 SP-A molecules) is occupied by the protein. These numbers make it likely that SP-A forms bridges between liposomes by a vesicle/SP-A/vesicle coupling mechanism. Together with the difference in kinetics between SP-A/liposome binding and aggregation, this argues for an asymmetric bivalent model of SP-A function, in agreement with a recent analysis of different functional regions in the SP-A structure (6).

Table III. Influence of SP-A concentration on liposome aggregation probed by NIR light scattering

Fit: f(x) = A · (1 - exp(-k) · t)), where A = amplitudes and k = rate constants.

Sheep SP-A conc A k SP-A/liposome

nM V s-1
2.4 2.9 0.0032 3.75
4.7 4.4 0.0044 7.3
6.9 5.1 0.0052 10.8
9.1 5.5 0.0061 14.2

Calcium Cooperativity

The results of this study are consistent with a model of the SP-A/liposome interaction that involves two states of the protein. The inactive protein does not interact, whereas the active protein, in concert with cooperative binding of Ca2+, interacts with liposomes. Conceivably, bound Ca2+ switches SP-A into a conformation, termed SP-Â, that exposes hydrophobic phospholipid-binding sites not available in the calcium-free protein. Such a Ca2+-dependent protein switch would induce both liposome binding to SP-A and SP-A-mediated liposome aggregation in the same affinity range (K0.5 approx  20 µM) in a time-ordered sequence. It is characteristic for this reaction sequence that liposome association/dissociation with SP-A is much faster than the respective aggregation/disaggregation of the liposomes.

We propose the following hypothesis for the SP-A/liposome interaction with SP-Â as the active conformation.
<AR><R><C>                                                    n≈6</C></R><R><C>                                             K<SUB>0.5</SUB>=20 &mgr;<SC>m</SC></C></R><R><C>                                                       ↓</C></R><R><C><UP>SP-A</UP>+x <UP>Ca</UP><SUP>2<UP>+</UP></SUP>+<UP>liposomes ⇌ SP-</UP><A><AC><UP>A</UP></AC><AC>ˆ</AC></A>(<UP>Ca</UP>)<SUB>x</SUB>+<UP>liposomes ⇌ SP-</UP><A><AC><UP>A</UP></AC><AC>ˆ</AC></A>(<UP>Ca</UP>)<SUB>x</SUB> · </C></R></AR>
<UP>liposomes ⇌ SP-</UP><A><AC><UP>A</UP></AC><AC>ˆ</AC></A>(<UP>Ca</UP>)<SUB>x</SUB> · <UP>liposome aggregates</UP>
<UP><SC>Reaction</SC> 1</UP>
From the binding data, a high cooperativity for Ca2+ is calculated with a Hill coefficient of ~6-9 (Table IV). The maximum value of n is equal to the number of effective sites. Although the number x of calcium atoms bound to SP-A is unknown, the high value for the Hill coefficient implies a strong cooperativity between multiple subunits. The complex multimeric structure of SP-A is compatible with this idea.

Coupled equilibria, such as described above, can be decoupled at one or more steps, provided enough driving energy is available for the remaining reactions. It is tempting to relate this model to results with SP-A, which was capable of binding lipids without aggregation activity. Such a loss of function was observed with SP-A altered by mutations in the carbohydrate recognition domain (6) and was also reported for SP-A damaged by free radicals (25, 26).

Physiological Implications

There are numerous physiological functions of SP-A, which depend on calcium and involve interaction with lipids. They include the following: (i) SP-A-dependent enhancement of phospholipid uptake (12), (ii) inhibition of surfactant secretion (27, 28), (iii) binding of SP-A to type II pneumocytes (29), (iv) aggregation of liposomes (10, 11, 22, 24, 30), and (v) enhanced adsorption and surface sorting of surfactant lipids (31). Their relation to the Ca2+-dependent switch of the SP-A/liposome interaction remains to be investigated. The protein should remain in its active lipid-binding conformation as long as calcium-binding sites are saturated in the alveolar hypophase, which contains 1.5 mM free Ca2+ (32). The operation of the switch to the inactive state and the concurrent release of lipids may depend on intracellular free Ca2+ concentrations in the micromolar range.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by grants from the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung/FoSped Program and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§   To whom correspondence should be addressed: Inst. für Medizinische Physik und Biophysik, Universitätsklinikum Charité, Humboldt Universität, Ziegelstraße 5-9, D-10098 Berlin, Germany. Tel.: 49-30-2802-6141; Fax: 49-30-2802-6377; E-mail: hofmann{at}rz.charite.hu-berlin.de.
1   The abbreviations used are: SP-A, surfactant protein A; NIR, near-infrared.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Oliver Ernst for introduction to the resonant mirror technique, Elke Hessel for calcium determinations, and Martin Heck for help with the NIR light scattering analyses.


REFERENCES

  1. Kuroki, Y., and Voelker, D. R. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 25943-25946 [Free Full Text]
  2. Suzuki, Y., Fujita, Y., and Kogishi, K. (1989) Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 140, 75-81 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. King, R. J., Klass, D. J., Gikas, E. G., and Clements, J. A. (1973) Am. J. Physiol. 224, 788-795 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. White, R. T., Damm, D., Miller, J., Spratt, K., Schilling, J., Hawgood, S., Benson, B., and Cordell, B. (1985) Nature 317, 361-363 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Voss, T., Eistetter, H., Schäfer, K. P., and Engel, J. (1988) J. Mol. Biol. 201, 219-227 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. McCormack, F. X., Kuroki, Y., Stewart, J. J., Manson, R. J., and Voelker, D. R. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 29801-29807 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Kuroki, Y., McCormack, F. X., Ogasawara, Y., Manson, R. J., and Voelker, D. R. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 29793-29800 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Ross, G. F., Notter, R. H., Meuth, J., and Whitsett, J. A. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 14283-14291 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Kuroki, Y., and Akino, T. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 3068-3073 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Hawgood, S., Benson, B. J., and Hamilton, R. J. (1985) Biochemistry 24, 184-190 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Efrati, H., Hawgood, S., Williams, M. C., Hong, K., and Benson, B. J. (1987) Biochemistry 26, 7986-7993 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Wright, J. R., Wagner, R. E., Hawgood, S., Dobbs, L., and Clements, J. A. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 2888-2894 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Wright, J. R., and Dobbs, L. G. (1991) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 53, 395-414 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. MacDonald, R. C., MacDonald, R. I., Menco, B. P. M., Takeshita, K., Subbarao, N. K., and Hu, L. (1991) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1061, 297-303 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Schleicher, A., and Hofmann, K. P. (1987) J. Membr. Biol. 95, 271-278 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Kahlert, M., Pepperberg, D. R., and Hofmann, K. P. (1990) Nature 345, 537-539 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Ernst, O., Hofmann, K. P., and Sakmar, T. P. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 10580-10586 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Yingst, D. R., and Hoffman, J. F. (1983) Anal. Biochem. 132, 431-448 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. King, R. J. (1984) Exp. Lung Res. 6, 237-253 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Haagsman, H. P., Elfring, R. H., van Buel, B. L. M., and Voorhout, W. F. (1991) Biochem. J. 275, 273-276 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Haagsman, H. P., Sargeant, T., Hauschka, P. V., Benson, B. J., and Hawgood, S. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 8894-8900 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Sohma, H., Watanabe, T., Kuroki, Y., Yoshino, H., Matsushima, N., Yazawa, M., and Akino, T. (1992) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1159, 150-154 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Ruano, M. L. F., Miguel, E., Perez-Gil, J., and Casals, C. (1996) Biochem. J. 313, 683-689 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Oosting, R. S., van Greevenbroeck, M. M., Verhoef, J., van Golde, L. M., and Haagsman, H. P. (1991) Am. J. Physiol. 261, L77-L85 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Haddad, I. Y., Zuh, S., Ischiropoulos, H., and Matalon, S. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 270, L281-L288 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Dobbs, L. G., Wright, J. R., Hawgood, S., Gonzalez, R., Venstrom, K., and Nellenbogen, J. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 1010-1014 [Abstract]
  28. Kuroki, Y., Manson, R. J., and Voelker, D. R. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 3388-3394 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Kuroki, Y., Manson, R. J., and Voelker, D. J. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 5566-5570 [Abstract]
  30. Ross, G. J., Sawyer, J., O'Connor, T., and Whitsett, J. A. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 858-865 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Schürch, S., Possmayer, F., Cheng, S., and Cockshutt, A. M. (1992) Am. J. Physiol. 263, L210-L218 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Nielson, D. W., and Lewis, M. B. (1988) Pediatr. Res. 24, 322-325 [Abstract]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.