Potassium Channel alpha  and beta  Subunits Assemble in the Endoplasmic Reticulum*

(Received for publication, June 14, 1996, and in revised form, October 24, 1996)

Naomi Nagaya Dagger and Diane M. Papazian §

From the Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, and Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1751

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

We have characterized the maturation of Shaker K+ channel protein and the cellular site of assembly of pore-forming alpha  and cytoplasmic beta  subunits in a transfected mammalian cell line. Shaker protein is made as a partially glycosylated, immature precursor that is converted to a fully glycosylated, mature product. Shaker protein did not mature when transport from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the Golgi apparatus was blocked. Consistent with this finding, only the immature form was sensitive to digestion with endoglycosidase H. These results indicate that the immature protein is core-glycosylated in the ER, whereas the oligosaccharides of the mature protein have been further processed in the Golgi compartment. After inhibiting ER-to-Golgi transport, the oligomeric state of Shaker subunits was assessed by cross-linking in intact cells or by solubilization and sucrose gradient sedimentation. The results indicate that Shaker subunits assemble with each other in the ER. When co-expressed, the Kvbeta 2 subunit also associated with Shaker in the ER. Assembly with the beta 2 subunit did not increase the rate or extent of Shaker protein maturation. Our results indicate that the biogenesis of Shaker K+ channels in vivo involves core glycosylation and subunit assembly in the ER, followed by efficient transfer to the Golgi apparatus where the oligosaccharides are modified.


INTRODUCTION

Ion channels are multisubunit membrane proteins involved in action potential propagation, neurotransmitter release, and excitation-contraction coupling in excitable tissues. To achieve their correct quaternary structures, ion channels undergo a complex series of events during biogenesis, including co- and posttranslational folding, modification, and subunit assembly. Although many multisubunit membrane proteins fold and assemble in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)1 (1), there are notable exceptions among channel-forming proteins (2).

Voltage-gated K+ channels, which regulate the excitability of nerve and muscle, contain four alpha  subunits that form the ion-conducting pore (3-6). Each alpha  subunit has a hydrophobic core containing a pore-forming domain and six putative membrane-spanning segments, flanked by cytoplasmic amino and carboxyl termini (7). The alpha  subunits in a K+ channel may be identical or may be different members of a subfamily of closely related proteins (8-12). In neurons, the pore-forming alpha  subunits may associate with cytoplasmic beta  subunits in a one-to-one stoichiometry (13, 14). In expression systems, beta  subunits have been shown to alter the functional properties, stability, and cell surface expression of K+ channels (15-18).

Recently, some of the molecular determinants that control assembly of the Shaker channel and its mammalian homologues, the Kv1 subfamily, have been identified. A conserved amino-terminal domain mediates the recognition and assembly of alpha  subunits (19-24). An overlapping region of the amino terminus is also important for the co-assembly of alpha  and beta  subunits (25, 26). Much less is known about other aspects of the biogenesis of K+ channels in cells.

We have characterized the maturation and cellular site of assembly of the voltage-dependent Shaker K+ channel in a transfected mammalian cell line. Our results demonstrate that maturation of Shaker protein requires ER-to-Golgi transport, with a corresponding change in the N-linked oligosaccharides from the high mannose type characteristic of the ER to the complex type characteristic of the Golgi apparatus. In addition, we find that Shaker channel alpha  subunits assemble with each other and with cytoplasmic beta  subunits in the ER, suggesting that only fully assembled channels are transported to the Golgi. Unlike the effect of beta subunits on some mammalian alpha  subunits (18), the beta  subunit does not act as a chaperone to facilitate the maturation of Shaker channels.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Cell Culture and Metabolic Labeling

Human embryonic kidney cells (HEK 293T) (27), kindly provided by Dr. R. B. DuBridge, were grown and transfected as described previously (28). For transfection experiments, the Shaker B cDNA (29) and a mutant construct, N259Q + N263Q, which eliminates N-linked glycosylation of Shaker protein (30), were transferred into the vector pcDNA1/AMP (Invitrogen). A subclone encoding the rat Kvbeta 2 protein in the pRGB4 vector was the generous gift of Dr. James S. Trimmer, SUNY, Stony Brook (31). In co-transfection experiments, Shaker and Kvbeta 2 DNAs were mixed in a 3:1 mass ratio. A total of 2 µg of DNA was used per 35-mm well of cells.

Forty-eight h after transfection with Shaker alone, HEK 293T cells were incubated for 30 min in methionine- and cysteine-free DMEM (Mediatech), pulsed for 3 h with 200 µCi/ml [35S]methionine and cysteine (Tran35S-Label, ICN or EasyTag Express Protein Labeling Mix [35S], DuPont NEN), and chased for 2 h in complete, nonradioactive medium. A crude membrane fraction was prepared and solubilized in the presence of protease inhibitors (30). Shaker protein was immunoprecipitated with antisera directed against a Shaker-beta -galactosidase fusion protein (32).

Forty-eight h after co-transfection of Shaker and Kvbeta 2, HEK 293T cells were pulsed for 10 min with 400 µCi/ml [35S]methionine and -cysteine and chased for 2 h in complete, nonradioactive DMEM supplemented with 5 mM methionine (Sigma). The cell plates were chilled on ice, and the cells were washed once with 1 ml per well of ice-cold Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (Mediatech) containing 5 mM NEM. Then, 0.75 ml of ice-cold lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100, HEPES-NaOH, pH 7.4, plus the protease inhibitors previously described (30) except that dithiothreitol was replaced by 5 mM NEM) was added, and the plates were rotated for 10 min at 4 °C. Cell lysates were centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C to remove insoluble material. Shaker and Kvbeta 2 proteins were immunoprecipitated from the supernatant using the anti-Shaker antibody described above or an anti-beta antibody (14) kindly provided by Dr. James S. Trimmer (SUNY, Stony Brook). The anti-beta antibody was used at a 1:200 dilution.

Endoglycosidase H Digestion

Immunoprecipitated protein was boiled for 3 min in endoglycosidase H (endo H) reaction buffer (50 mM sodium acetate, 10 mM EDTA, 0.06% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, pH 5.5). Samples were treated at 37 °C for 16 h with 20 milliunits/ml endo H (Boehringer Mannheim) in the presence of 0.36% Triton X-100, 0.5 mM phenylmethanesulfonate, 50 µg/ml antipain, 2 µg/ml aprotinin, and 0.7 µg/ml pepstatin. Enzyme treatment was terminated by adding Laemmli sample buffer and boiling for 3 min.

Low Temperature Incubation and Brefeldin A Treatment

For incubation of cells at low temperatures, culture plates or flasks were sealed in plastic wrap and placed in a refrigerated incubator (15 °C), in an air-conditioned room (20 °C), or a standard incubator (27 °C). For treatment with both brefeldin A (BFA) and nocodazole, cells were incubated in methionine- and cysteine-free DMEM containing 20 µg/ml nocodazole (Sigma) in Me2SO (Sigma) for 40 min followed by continued starvation in the presence of both nocodazole and BFA (5 µg/ml in Me2SO, Sigma) for another 30 min. During subsequent pulse and chase, both drugs were present. Treatment with one drug alone or no drug followed the same incubation schedule except that the omitted drugs were substituted with an equal volume of Me2SO.

Cross-linking by Disulfide Formation

Specific disulfide bonds between Shaker subunits were oxidized in intact cells by exposing them to 1 mM iodine for 10 min as described previously (6). Shaker protein was then solubilized, immunoprecipitated, and boiled in sample buffer containing either 10% 2-mercaptoethanol (reducing conditions) or 16 mM iodoacetamide (nonreducing conditions).

Expression of a Covalent Tetramer of Shaker Subunits

A covalently linked Shaker tetramer construct in the vector pGEM-A, kindly provided by Dr. Fred J. Sigworth, Yale University (33), was expressed in Xenopus oocytes. The subclone was digested with NotI and cRNA was transcribed using the mMESSAGE mMACHINE kit (Ambion). RNA was co-injected with in vitro translation grade [35S]methionine (ICN) into oocytes as described previously (30).

Sucrose Gradient Centrifugation

Metabolically labeled protein from HEK 293T cells or oocytes was solubilized in 50 mM Tris, pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA containing either 2% CHAPS (Sigma) or 2% Zwittergent 3-12 (Calbiochem-Novabiochem) plus protease inhibitors as described above. Solubilized protein (500-750 µl) was loaded on a 5-20% sucrose gradient (11 ml) containing either 2% CHAPS or 2% Zwittergent supplemented with 5 mM NEM and protease inhibitors except bestatin and antipain. Gradients were centrifuged at 36,000 rpm in an SW41 rotor for 20 h at 20 °C. Approximately 15 fractions (about 750-780 µl each) were collected from the bottom of each gradient and subjected to immunoprecipitation. Supernatants were saved for refractive index measurements, which were made with an Abbe-3L refractometer (Milton Roy) at 24 °C.

Electrophoresis and Immunoblot Analysis

Protein samples in Laemmli sample buffer were boiled for 3 min prior to electrophoresis. Proteins were fractionated by electrophoresis using standard Laemmli gels prepared with a 7.5 or 10% acrylamide separating phase and a 4% stacking phase. For analysis of cross-linked adducts of Shaker protein, gels were prepared with a 5% separating phase and a 3% stacking phase. Apparent molecular weights were determined using broad range standards (Bio-Rad) and high molecular weight standards (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.). After transfer of proteins to nitrocellulose, immunoblots were probed with an antibody specific for 14 amino acids at the carboxyl terminus of the Shaker protein (28).

Fluorography and Densitometry

Following electrophoresis, gels were stained in Coomassie Blue, destained, washed in double-distilled water, and incubated in Fluoro-Hance (Research Products International). Dried gels were exposed to X-Omat AR-5 film (Eastman Kodak) at -80 °C. Fluorographs of gels were scanned and analyzed using the Model GS-700 scanning densitometer and Molecular Analyst Software version 1.4 (Bio-Rad). For low temperature and BFA experiments, relative amounts of immature and mature Shaker protein were quantified by peak integration analysis. For sucrose gradient experiments, relative amounts of Shaker protein in gradient fractions were quantified by volume analysis.


RESULTS

Maturation of Shaker Protein Is Blocked by Inhibiting ER-to-Golgi Transport

The glycosylation of Shaker K+ channel protein has been characterized in several expression systems, including an insect cell line (Sf9), Xenopus laevis oocytes, and a mammalian cell line (HEK 293T) (28, 30). Asparagine-linked glycosylation, which occurs at Asn-259 and Asn-263 in the first extracellular loop of the protein, is not required for the assembly of functional channels or their transport to the cell surface (30). In oocytes and HEK 293T cells, glycosylation occurs in two stages, giving rise to a partially glycosylated, immature precursor that is efficiently converted to a fully glycosylated, mature product (Ref. 28; see Fig. 3).


Fig. 3. Differential sensitivity of the mature and immature forms of the Shaker protein to endoglycosidase H. HEK 293T cells were transfected with wild-type Shaker B (ShB) or an unglycosylated mutant (N259Q + N263Q) (30). Immunoprecipitated protein was incubated in reaction buffer in the absence (-) or presence (+) of endo H. Digested and mock-digested protein was fractionated by electrophoresis and subjected to immunoblot analysis. Wild-type Shaker protein appears as two forms: the lower molecular weight, immature form and the higher molecular weight, mature form (28, 30). Molecular mass standards are shown on the left.
[View Larger Version of this Image (34K GIF file)]


This differential glycosylation suggests that the immature precursor has been core-glycosylated in the ER, whereas the mature product has been further modified in the Golgi apparatus (34). To determine whether maturation of Shaker protein requires transport from the ER to the Golgi, movement of newly synthesized protein between these compartments was arrested by two known inhibitors of intracellular transport in mammalian cells, low temperature incubation, and brefeldin A (BFA) treatment (35-39). The extent of maturation was then assayed by comparing the relative amounts of the immature and mature forms of the Shaker protein. At 37 °C, about 80% of the immature form is converted to the mature form within 1.5 h, and conversion is virtually complete within 2.5 to 3 h (Ref. 28; see Fig. 1D).


Fig. 1. Low temperature incubation reduces the extent of Shaker protein maturation. Wild-type Shaker protein was metabolically labeled, immunoprecipitated, and subjected to electrophoresis and fluorography. Fluorographs were analyzed by densitometry. The percentage of total Shaker protein that was mature (filled bars) or immature (open bars) is shown for a 15 °C pulse followed by a chase at 15 or 37 °C (A), for a 20 °C pulse followed by a chase at 20 or 37 °C (B), for a 27 °C pulse followed by a chase at 27 or 37 °C (C), and for a 37 °C pulse followed by a 37 °C chase (D). Percentages are shown as mean ± S.D., n = 2-3.
[View Larger Version of this Image (12K GIF file)]


Incubation of mammalian cells at 15 °C prevents the transport of newly synthesized secretory and membrane proteins to the Golgi apparatus (35, 36). HEK 293T cells were metabolically labeled at 15 °C for 3 h and collected following a 2-h chase in nonradioactive medium at either 15 or 37 °C (Fig. 1A). Following pulse and chase at 15 °C, the extent of maturation was significantly reduced compared with that obtained after pulse and chase at 37 °C (see Fig. 1D). Of the total Shaker protein, nearly 90% was in the immature form after the 2-h chase at 15 °C. The blockade in maturation induced by incubation at 15 °C was reversible, however, as shown by the large increase in maturation following a 2-h chase at 37 °C (Fig. 1A).

In other mammalian cell lines, incubation at 20 °C does not block transport of membrane and secretory proteins to the Golgi compartment (35). However, similar to the results of incubation at 15 °C, we found that the extent of maturation was significantly but reversibly reduced following a 3-h pulse and a 2-h chase at 20 °C (Fig. 1B). These results suggest that ER-to-Golgi transport remains inhibited at 20 °C in HEK 293T cells. In contrast, incubation at 27 °C did not prevent maturation of the Shaker protein (Fig. 1C); the extent of maturation was similar to that seen after pulse and chase at 37 °C (Fig. 1D). Thus, the effects of low temperature incubation on the relative amounts of immature and mature Shaker protein suggest that ER-to-Golgi transport is required for maturation.

Alternatively, ER-to-Golgi transport was blocked with BFA in either the presence or absence of nocodazole, a drug which makes BFA a more specific inhibitor of protein transport (37-39). HEK 293T cells were metabolically labeled during continued treatment with BFA, BFA and nocodazole, nocodazole, or Me2SO, the drug vehicle (Fig. 2). Following treatment with BFA, either alone or in combination with nocodazole, maturation of the Shaker protein was completely blocked. In contrast, maturation was not inhibited by treatment with nocodazole or Me2SO alone. Thus, these results provide further evidence that ER-to-Golgi transport is required for maturation of the Shaker protein.


Fig. 2. Brefeldin A blocks maturation of Shaker protein. Wild-type Shaker protein was metabolically labeled and analyzed as in Fig. 1. The percentage of total Shaker protein that was either mature (filled bars) or immature (open bars) is shown for pulse and chase in the continued presence of brefeldin A (BFA), brefeldin A and nocodazole (BFA + NOC), nocodazole (NOC), or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Percentages are shown as mean ± S.D., n = 2.
[View Larger Version of this Image (24K GIF file)]


Maturation of Shaker Protein Involves Modification in the Medial Golgi

To characterize the differential glycosylation of the immature and mature forms of Shaker protein, wild-type protein was expressed in HEK 293T cells and incubated in the presence (+) or absence (-) of endoglycosidase H (endo H) (Fig. 3). Conversion of a protein from an endo H-sensitive to an endo H-resistant form indicates that the oligosaccharide moieties have been processed in the medial Golgi compartment (40-42). The mature form of wild-type Shaker protein (Fig. 3, 108 kDa) showed no significant change in apparent molecular mass (107 kDa) following incubation with endo H, indicating that it is endo H-resistant. The immature form (80 kDa), however, decreased in apparent molecular mass by about 8 kDa following incubation with endo H (72 kDa), indicating that it is endo H-sensitive. The digested precursor comigrated with unglycosylated protein (72 kDa) of the mutant construct, N259Q + N263Q, in which the two asparagine residues that are normally modified by the attachment of N-linked oligosaccharides have been replaced by glutamine residues (30). The differential sensitivity of immature and mature Shaker protein to endo H indicates that maturation involves the conversion of high mannose oligosaccharides to a complex form in the medial Golgi compartment.

Oxidative Cross-linking in Situ Indicates that Shaker Subunits Assemble in the ER

To determine whether Shaker subunits assemble in the ER, ER-to-Golgi transport was inhibited, and the state of assembly of Shaker protein was examined in intact cells by cross-linking with iodine. Iodine, an oxidizing reagent, catalyzes the formation of a specific disulfide bond between Cys-96 in the amino terminus and Cys-505 in the carboxyl terminus of adjacent Shaker subunits (6). Although the subunits are not normally linked by disulfide bonds (28), functional assays under oxidizing conditions indicate that the formation of these bonds does not disrupt the native structure or function of the channel (6).

HEK 293T cells were metabolically labeled at 15 or 37 °C and treated in the absence (-) or presence (+) of 1 mM iodine (Fig. 4). Under reducing conditions, only monomeric Shaker protein was observed; after incubation at 15 °C, the immature form was present (open arrow 1), whereas after incubation at 37 °C, primarily the mature form was present (filled arrow 1). Under nonreducing conditions, disulfide-bonded adducts of Shaker protein corresponding to a dimer (arrows 2), trimer (arrows 3), and two tetramers, one linear (arrows 4) and one circular (arrows 4c) were observed (6). After incubation at 15 °C, the adducts were composed of immature Shaker protein (open arrows), whereas after incubation at 37 °C, the adducts were primarily composed of mature protein (filled arrows). The fact that adducts were observed after blocking ER-to-Golgi transport by incubation at 15 °C suggests that assembly of the subunits occurs in the ER. The intensities of the tetrameric adducts indicate that the immature form of the Shaker protein exists predominantly as fully assembled tetramers in the ER. Blockade of ER-to-Golgi transport by BFA and nocodazole treatment gave results similar to those obtained from low temperature incubation (data not shown).


Fig. 4. Incubation at 15 °C does not block Shaker channel assembly in HEK 293T cells. Following metabolic labeling and chase at either 15 or 37 °C, intact cells were incubated in the absence (-) or presence (+) of 1 mM iodine, which catalyzes the formation of disulfide bonds between Shaker subunits (6). Immunoprecipitated protein was subjected to electrophoresis under reducing or nonreducing conditions. Arrowheads (open, 15 °C; filled, 37 °C) indicate Shaker monomers (1) and their respective adducts: dimer (2), trimer (3), linear tetramer (4), and circular tetramer (4c) (Ref. 6). Bands migrating slightly above the disulfide-bonded dimers under both reducing and nonreducing conditions are likely to be noncovalently associated dimers of Shaker protein (6). Molecular mass standards are shown on the left.
[View Larger Version of this Image (30K GIF file)]


Sucrose Gradient Centrifugation Indicates that Shaker Subunits Assemble in the ER

The state of assembly of Shaker protein was also assessed by sucrose gradient centrifugation (Fig. 5). The detergent CHAPS has been shown to solubilize wild-type Shaker protein in an active, assembled form (43). Furthermore, Shaker homologues expressed in vitro and solubilized in CHAPS sediment with a velocity consistent with a tetrameric structure (20). In contrast, Shaker homologues solubilized in Zwittergent sediment as monomers (20). Following incubation at 37 °C (Fig. 5A) or treatment with Me2SO (Fig. 5C), Shaker protein solubilized in CHAPS sedimented with a velocity consistent with a multimeric state, whereas Shaker protein solubilized in Zwittergent sedimented with a velocity consistent with a monomeric state. To determine whether Shaker protein assembles in the ER, ER-to-Golgi transport was inhibited. Following incubation at 15 °C, immature Shaker protein solubilized in CHAPS sedimented to the denser region of the gradient, consistent with a multimeric state of assembly (Fig. 5B). Following Zwittergent solubilization, immature Shaker protein sedimented to a lighter region of the gradient, consistent with the monomeric state. Similar results were obtained after blocking ER-to-Golgi transport with BFA and nocodazole (Fig. 5D). Within experimental error, the sedimentation profiles of the mature and ER resident, immature forms of the protein overlapped in gradients containing CHAPS or in gradients containing Zwittergent. Thus, the results of sucrose gradient centrifugation, like those obtained from disulfide cross-linking, demonstrate that assembly of Shaker subunits occurs in the ER.


Fig. 5. Sucrose gradient centrifugation indicates that Shaker protein is assembled after 15 °C incubation or treatment with brefeldin A. A-D, wild-type Shaker protein expressed in HEK 293T cells was metabolically labeled and solubilized in either 2% CHAPS (filled circles) or 2% Zwittergent 3-12 (open circles) and then sedimented on linear 5-20% sucrose gradients. Shaker protein was immunoprecipitated from gradient fractions, subjected to electrophoresis and fluorography, and quantified by densitometry. Mean optical density (OD) for each fraction was normalized to the maximum value for the gradient and expressed as percentage. Distributions of sedimented protein are shown for pulse and chase at 37 °C (A), at 15 °C (B), in the presence of Me2SO (DMSO) (C), or in the presence of brefeldin A and nocodazole (D). E, the covalently linked tetramer of Shaker 29-4 subunits was metabolically labeled in Xenopus oocytes. Forty-eight h after injection, protein was solubilized in either 2% CHAPS (filled circles) or 2% Zwittergent (open circles) and then subjected to sedimentation and analysis as described above. Representative experiments are shown. Lower refractive indices correspond to lighter gradient fractions, whereas higher refractive indices correspond to denser gradient fractions.
[View Larger Version of this Image (37K GIF file)]


To determine whether the position of the Shaker protein on the CHAPS gradients corresponded to that of an authentic tetramer, we investigated the sedimentation properties of a covalently linked tetramer of Shaker subunits. This construct consists of four repeats of an inactivation-removed Shaker 29-4 monomer (44) connected by three 19-amino acid linkers (45) and has a predicted molecular mass of about 280 kDa (33). It provides an ideal marker for the hydrodynamic properties of the assembled channel (6). Similar to wild-type Shaker B protein expressed in HEK 293T cells, this covalent tetramer appears as an immature, core-glycosylated form in addition to the predominant, mature form (6).

The covalent tetramer was expressed and metabolically labeled in Xenopus oocytes, solubilized in CHAPS or Zwittergent, and subjected to sedimentation on sucrose gradients. As shown in Fig. 5E, covalent tetramer protein solubilized in CHAPS (filled circles) sedimented as one major peak to the denser half of the gradient. The position of this peak overlapped with that of the mature (Fig. 5, A and C) and immature (Fig. 5, B and D) forms of the protein in CHAPS. These results indicate that the multimers of mature and immature Shaker protein sediment with a velocity consistent with a tetrameric state following CHAPS solubilization. Thus, the results of sucrose gradient centrifugation confirm that Shaker subunits assemble into tetramers in the ER.

As expected, the covalent tetramer did not co-sediment with monomers after Zwittergent solubilization (open circles) but instead sedimented to the denser half of the gradient. This peak did not overlap with that seen in CHAPS, suggesting that Zwittergent weakens the interactions between the covalently linked subunits, which of course cannot be fully dissociated.

beta Subunit Assembles with Shaker Channel in the ER

Cytoplasmic beta  subunits have previously been shown to associate with K+ channels, altering their functional properties, cell surface expression, or stability (14-18). Endogenous beta  subunits, which are present in some cell lines, have not been detected in HEK 293 cells, however (46). To determine whether beta  subunits assemble with Shaker subunits, the rat Kvbeta 2 protein was co-expressed with Shaker in HEK 293T cells. Kvbeta 2 is homologous to the Drosophila beta  subunit, Hyperkinetic, which is thought to associate with Shaker subunits in vivo (16). Specific association between the Shaker and Kvbeta 2 proteins in HEK 293T cells was demonstrated by reciprocal immunoprecipitation. Anti-Shaker antibodies precipitated Kvbeta 2 (~38 kDa), and anti-beta antibodies precipitated Shaker protein (Fig. 6). Interestingly, the anti-beta antibody precipitated both the immature and mature forms of Shaker protein, suggesting that Shaker and beta  subunits associate in the ER (Fig. 6, left panel). To test this idea further, the Shaker and Kvbeta 2 proteins were co-expressed and metabolically labeled during a 10-min pulse in the presence of BFA and nocodazole. Following blockade of ER-to-Golgi transport, both anti-beta and anti-Shaker antibodies co-precipitated the immature form of Shaker with Kvbeta 2 (Fig. 6, middle panel), confirming that the alpha  and beta  subunits assemble in the ER. Results from cells treated with Me2SO alone were identical to those obtained from untreated cells (Fig. 6, right panel).


Fig. 6. Shaker and Kvbeta 2 subunits associate in the endoplasmic reticulum. The Shaker and Kvbeta 2 proteins were co-expressed and metabolically labeled in HEK 293T cells. Solubilized protein was immunoprecipitated with Shaker-specific or beta -specific antibodies, as indicated, and then subjected to electrophoresis and fluorography. Arrowheads indicate the two forms of Shaker protein (mature alpha and immature alpha ) and the Kvbeta 2 (beta 2) protein after labeling in untreated cells (left), in cells treated with BFA plus nocodazole in Me2SO (DMSO) (middle), and in cells treated with Me2SO (right).
[View Larger Version of this Image (28K GIF file)]


It has been previously reported that Kvbeta 2 acts as a chaperone for mammalian K+ channel alpha  subunits (18). To determine whether this is a general property of Kvbeta 2, we investigated the effect of co-expression on the maturation of Shaker protein. The presence of Kvbeta 2 did not increase the rate or extent of Shaker protein maturation (data not shown). In fact, co-expression slowed the rate of Shaker maturation (data not shown). This is likely to be a nonspecific effect, caused by competition for the cellular factors needed to over-express two exogenous proteins simultaneously. Similar effects have been seen upon co-expression of other proteins.2


DISCUSSION

We have characterized three important features of Shaker K+ channel biogenesis in a mammalian cell line. First, maturation of the Shaker protein requires transport from the ER to the Golgi apparatus. Second, the immature form of the Shaker protein contains high mannose oligosaccharides characteristic of the ER, whereas the mature form contains complex oligosaccharides characteristic of modification in the Golgi apparatus. Third, Shaker subunits assemble with each other and with beta  subunits in the ER. Thus, it is now possible to assign some of the steps in Shaker channel biogenesis to specific intracellular compartments.

Shaker K+ Channels Assemble in the ER

Our conclusion that Shaker channels assemble in the ER is consistent with biochemical and electrophysiological analysis of K+ channel protein translated in vitro. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments suggest that Shaker homologues form heteromultimers within 15 min of the start of translation in vitro (47). Shaker protein translated in vitro in the presence of microsomal membranes can be reconstituted into lipid bilayers to produce functional channels (48), consistent with the idea that the core-glycosylated, ER form of the protein is not only assembled but functionally competent.

For many oligomeric proteins, assembly occurs in the ER and is required for transport to the Golgi apparatus and subsequently to the cell surface (1, 49). Among channel-forming proteins, however, there are exceptions. Whereas subunits of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor appear to be transported out of the ER as assembled pentamers (50-52), gap junction hemichannels and voltage-dependent Na+ channels assemble, at least in part, after leaving the ER (53, 54). Connexin43, a subunit of gap junctions, assembles into hexameric connexons in a post-ER compartment, most likely the trans-Golgi network (53). Similarly, in rat brain neurons, association of the alpha  and beta 2 subunits of the Na+ channel occurs in the Golgi apparatus late during biogenesis (54). In contrast, our data indicate that both the pore-forming alpha  and cytoplasmic beta  subunits of voltage-dependent K+ channels assemble in the ER.

Shi et al. (18) have recently reported that Kvbeta 2 increases the glycosylation, stability, and cell surface expression of a mammalian Shaker homologue, Kv1.2, expressed in a cell line. They proposed that the beta  subunit acts as a chaperone to promote the proper folding and assembly of pore-forming alpha  subunits. In contrast, co-expression of Kvbeta 2 with Shaker does not increase the rate or extent of Shaker maturation. Therefore, the chaperone action of the beta  subunit depends on the specific alpha  subunit with which it is expressed. One key difference between the Shaker and Kv1.2 proteins is their efficiency of glycosylation in cell culture. When expressed in the absence of Kvbeta 2, Shaker undergoes efficient, virtually complete glycosylation and transfer to the Golgi apparatus (28), whereas the Kv1.2 protein is poorly glycosylated and is primarily found in the ER (18). These results suggest that the Drosophila alpha  subunit is more robust than its mammalian counterpart, able to mature efficiently in expression systems without the need for chaperone action by a beta  subunit.

Shaker Protein Is Subject to the Quality Control System of the ER

We have previously shown that maturation provides a consistent and reliable indication that the Shaker protein is in a native conformation (55).3 For wild-type Shaker protein expressed in HEK 293T cells, maturation is very efficient, occurring with an apparent t1/2 of 45 min and reaching virtual completion within 2.5 h (28). However, some site-directed mutations prevent maturation by disrupting specific structural interactions that are essential for the proper folding of the protein (55, 56). These mutations can be rescued by introducing specific, complementary, second-site mutations, which restore both maturation and function (55).3 Because we have now shown that maturation requires ER-to-Golgi transport, the non-maturing phenotype can be attributed to retention of the misfolded protein in the ER in a core-glycosylated state. Taken together, these results indicate that the Shaker protein is subject to quality control in the ER (57-59) and that only properly folded and assembled channels are transferred to the Golgi apparatus.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported in part by grants from the W. M. Keck Foundation, the Pew Charitable Trusts, the Muscular Dystrophy Association, and the Stein Oppenheimer Fund (UCLA) (to D. M. P.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    Supported by an institutional National Institutes of Health National Research Service Award NS0710115 and the American Heart Association, Greater Los Angeles Affiliate. Present address: Dept. of Neurology, University of Michigan, Neuroscience Lab Bldg., 1103 E. Huron St., Ann Arbor, MI 48104-1687.
§   To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Physiology, UCLA School of Medicine, Box 951751, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1751. Tel.: 310-206-7043; Fax: 310-206-5661; E-mail: papazian{at}physiology.medsch.ucla.edu.
1    The abbreviations used are: ER, endoplasmic reticulum; BFA, brefeldin A; CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate; DMEM, Dulbecco's modification of Eagle's medium; Me2SO, dimethyl sulfoxide; endo H, endoglycosidase H; HEK 293T, human embryonic kidney cells; NEM, N-ethylmaleimide.
2    R. M. Jiménez and D. M. Papazian, unpublished observations.
3    S. K. Tiwari-Woodruff, C. T. Schulteis, A. F. Mock, and D. M. Papazian, submitted for publication.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Lily Y. Jan for antibodies, Dr. Fred J. Sigworth for the covalent tetramer cDNA, Dr. James S. Trimmer for the Kvbeta 2 subclone and antibodies, Dr. Ernest M. Wright for his support, and members of the Papazian laboratory for their comments on the manuscript.


REFERENCES

  1. Hurtley, S. M., and Helenius, A. (1989) Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 5, 277-307 [CrossRef]
  2. Green, W. N., and Millar, N. S. (1995) Trends Neurosci. 18, 280-287 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. MacKinnon, R. (1991) Nature 350, 232-235 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Liman, E. R., Tytgat, J., and Hess, P. (1992) Neuron 9, 861-871 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Li, M., Unwin, N., Stauffer, K. A., Jan, Y. N., and Jan, L. Y. (1994) Curr. Biol. 4, 110-115 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Schulteis, C. T., Nagaya, N., and Papazian, D. M. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 12133-12140 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Miller, C. (1990) Science 252, 1092-1096
  8. Christie, M. J., North, R. A., Osborne, P. B., Douglass, J., and Adelman, J. (1990) Neuron 2, 405-411
  9. Ruppersberg, J. P., Schroter, K. H., Sakmann, B., Stocker, M., Sewing, S., and Pongs, O. (1990) Nature 345, 535-537 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Covarrubias, M., Wei, A., and Salkoff, L. (1991) Neuron 7, 763-773 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Sheng, M., Liao, Y. J., Jan, Y. N., and Jan, L. Y. (1993) Nature 365, 72-75 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Wang, H., Kunkel, D. D., Martin, T. M., Schwartzkroin, P. A., and Tempel, B. L. (1993) Nature 365, 75-79 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Parcej, D. N., Scott, V. E. S., and Dolly, J. O. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 11084-11088 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Rhodes, K. J., Keilbaugh, S. A., Barrezueta, N. X., Lopez, K. L., and Trimmer, J. S. (1995) J. Neurosci. 15, 5360-5371 [Abstract]
  15. Scott, V. E. S., Rettig, J., Parcej, D. N., Keen, J. N., Findlay, J. B. C., Pongs, O., and Dolly, J. O. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 1637-1641 [Abstract]
  16. Chouinard, S. W., Wilson, G. F., Schlimgen, A. K., and Ganetzky, B. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 6763-6767 [Abstract]
  17. Rettig, J., Heinemann, S. H., Wunder, F., Lorra, C., Parcej, D. N., Dolly, J. O., and Pongs, O. (1994) Nature 369, 289-294 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Shi, G., Nakahira, K., Hammond, S., Rhodes, K. J., Schechter, L. E., and Trimmer, J. S. (1996) Neuron 16, 843-852 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Li, M., Jan, Y. N., and Jan, L. Y. (1992) Science 257, 1225-1230 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Shen, N. V., Chen, X., Boyer, M. M., and Pfaffinger, P. J. (1993) Neuron 11, 67-76 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Hopkins, W. F., Demas, V., and Tempel, B. L. (1994) J. Neurosci. 14, 1385-1393 [Abstract]
  22. Lee, T. E., Philipson, L. H., Kuznetsov, A., and Nelson, D. J. (1994) Biophys. J. 66, 667-673 [Abstract]
  23. Shen, N. V., and Pfaffinger, P. J. (1995) Neuron 14, 625-633 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Xu, J., Yu, W., Jan, Y. N., Jan, L. Y., and Li, M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 24761-24768 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Sewing, S., Roeper, J., and Pongs, O. (1996) Neuron 16, 455-463 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Yu, W., Xu, J., and Li, M. (1996) Neuron 16, 441-453 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. DuBridge, R. B., Tang, P., Hsia, H. C., Leong, P.-M., Miller, J. H., and Calos, M. P. (1987) Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 379-387 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Schulteis, C. T., John, S. A., Huang, Y., Tang, C.-Y., and Papazian, D. M. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 1725-1733 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Schwarz, T. L., Tempel, B. L., Papazian, D. M., Jan, Y. N., and Jan, L. Y. (1988) Nature 331, 137-142 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Santacruz-Toloza, L., Huang, Y., John, S. A., and Papazian, D. M. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 5607-5613 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Nakahira, K., Shi, G., Rhodes, K. J., and Trimmer, J. S. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 7084-7089 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Schwarz, T. L., Papazian, D. M., Carretto, R. C., Jan, Y. N., and Jan, L. Y. (1990) Neuron 2, 119-127
  33. Lin, L., McCormack, K., and Sigworth, F. J. (1994) Biophys. J. 66, A106
  34. Rowling, P. J. E., and Freedman, R. B. (1993) in Subcellular Biochemistry: Endoplasmic Reticulum (Borgese, N., and Harris, J. R., eds), Vol. 21, pp. 41-81, Plenum Publishing Corp., New York
  35. Saraste, J., and Kuismanen, E. (1984) Cell 38, 535-549 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Schweizer, A., Fransen, J. A. M., Matter, K., Kreis, T. E., Ginsel, L., and Hauri, H.-P. (1990) Eur. J. Cell Biol. 53, 185-196 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Misumi, Y., Misumi, Y., Miki, K., Takatsuki, A., Tamura, G., and Ikehara, Y. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 11398-11403 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Lippincott-Schwartz, J., Donaldson, J. G., Schweizer, J., Berger, E. G., Hauri, H.-P., Yuan, L. C., and Klausner, R. D. (1990) Cell 60, 821-836 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Klausner, R. D., Donaldson, J. G., and Lippincott-Schwartz, J. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 116, 1071-1080 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Tarentino, A. L., Plummer, T. H., and Maley, F. (1974) J. Biol. Chem. 249, 818-824 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Dunphy, W. G., and Rothman, J. E. (1985) Cell 42, 13-21 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Kornfeld, R., and Kornfeld, S. (1985) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 54, 631-664 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Santacruz-Toloza, L., Perozo, E., and Papazian, D. M. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 1295-1299 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. McCormack, K., Lin, L., and Sigworth, F. J. (1993) Biophys. J. 65, 1740-1748 [Abstract]
  45. McCormack, K., Lin, L., Iverson, L. E., Tanouye, M. A., and Sigworth, F. J. (1992) Biophys. J. 63, 1406-1411 [Abstract]
  46. Uebele, V. N., England, S. K., Chaudhary, A., Tamkun, M. M., and Snyders, D. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 2406-2412 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Deal, K. K., Lovinger, D. M., and Tamkun, M. M. (1994) J. Neurosci. 14, 1666-1676 [Abstract]
  48. Rosenberg, R. L., and East, J. E. (1992) Nature 360, 166-169 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Rose, J. K., and Doms, R. W. (1988) Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 4, 257-288 [CrossRef]
  50. Smith, M. M., Lindstrom, J., and Merlie, J. P. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 4367-4376 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Gu, Y., Ralston, E., Murphy-Erdosh, C., Black, R. A., and Hall, Z. W. (1989) J. Cell Biol. 109, 729-738 [Abstract]
  52. Ross, A. F., Green, W. N., Hartman, D. S., and Claudio, T. (1991) J. Cell Biol. 113, 623-636 [Abstract]
  53. Musil, L. S., and Goodenough, D. A. (1993) Cell 74, 1065-1077 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  54. Schmidt, J. W., and Catterall, W. A. (1986) Cell 46, 437-445 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  55. Papazian, D. M., Shao, X. M., Seoh, S.-A., Mock, A. F., Huang, Y., and Wainstock, D. H. (1995) Neuron 14, 1293-1301 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. Perozo, E., Santacruz-Toloza, L., Stefani, E., Bezanilla, F., and Papazian, D. M. (1994) Biophys. J. 66, 345-354 [Abstract]
  57. Gething, M. J., and Sambrook, J. (1992) Nature 335, 33-45
  58. Fra, A., and Sitia, R. (1993) in Subcellular Biochemistry: Endoplasmic Reticulum (Borgese, N., and Harris, J. R., eds), Vol. 21, pp. 143-169, Plenum Publishing Corp., New York
  59. Pelham, H. R. B. (1989) Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 5, 1-23 [CrossRef]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.