(Received for publication, August 23, 1996, and in revised form, December 20, 1996)
From the Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular
Biology, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
20892-4255 and ¶ Section of Immunobiology and Department of
Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute Yale University School of
Medicine, New Haven Connecticut 06510
The Jak1, Jak2, Jak3, and Fes tyrosine kinases
have been demonstrated to undergo tyrosine phosphorylation in response
to interleukin (IL)-4 stimulation in different cell systems. However,
it is not clear which, if any, of these kinases are responsible for
initiating IL-4-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of intracellular
substrates in vivo. In the present study, we have utilized
a mutant Jak1-deficient HeLa cell line, E1C3, and its parental
Jak1-expressing counterpart, 1D4, to analyze the role of Jak1 in
mediating IL-4-induced tyrosine phosphorylation events. IL-4 treatment
rapidly induced tyrosine phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate
(IRS)-1 and IRS-2 in 1D4 but not in E1C3 cells. IL-4-mediated tyrosine
phosphorylation of Stat6 was pronounced in 1D4 cells, while no
IL-4-induced Stat6 phosphorylation was detected in E1C3 cells. IL-4
also induced Stat6 DNA binding activity from lysates of 1D4 but not
E1C3 cells utilizing a radiolabeled immunoglobulin heavy chain germline
promotor sequence (I
) in an electrophoretic mobility shift
assay. Reconstitution of Jak1 expression in E1C3 cells restored the
ability of IL-4 to induce IRS and Stat6 tyrosine phosphorylation. These results provide evidence that Jak1 expression is required for mediating
tyrosine phosphorylation and activation of crucial molecules involved
in IL-4 signal transduction.
Interleukin (IL)1-4 is known to play a
critical role in determining the nature of an immune response to a
given pathogen. In addition, IL-4 has been demonstrated to mediate a
diverse array of proliferative and functional effects in cells of
nonhematopoietic origin (1). The multifunctional role of IL-4 is
reflected by the ubiquitous expression of IL-4 receptors (IL-4Rs) in
both hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic cell types (2-4). The cDNA
encoding a high affinity subunit for the human IL-4R has been cloned
and termed IL-4R (5, 6). Analysis of the IL-4R
sequence revealed that it is a member of the hematopoietin receptor superfamily. While
IL-4R
possesses a large cytoplasmic domain of approximately 500 amino acids, no consensus sequences for tyrosine or serine/threonine kinases have been identified. It has been demonstrated that IL-4 can
also utilize the
chain of the IL-2 receptor (IL-2R
) in a complex
with IL-4R
to enhance ligand binding and signal transduction (7,
8).
Despite the lack of a tyrosine kinase domain in the cytoplasmic region
of either IL-4R or IL-2R
, IL-4 stimulation leads to tyrosine
phosphorylation of IL-4R
and certain intracellular signaling
molecules. IL-4 treatment has been demonstrated to result in tyrosine
phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1), IRS-2
(formerly termed 4PS), Stat6, and other undefined molecules (9-16). We
have previously established that expression and tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 or IRS-2 are required for efficient
IL-4-mediated mitogenesis in 32D myeloid cells (17, 18). Recent studies characterizing the phenotype of Stat6
/
mice have
provided evidence that Stat6 expression is required for multiple
functional responses induced by IL-4 and strongly implicate Stat6
involvement in IL-4-induced proliferative effects (19-21). It is well
established that tyrosine phosphorylation of Stat proteins is essential
for their dimerization and translocation to the nucleus where they
activate transcription (22, 23). These studies substantiate that
tyrosine kinase-mediated phosphorylation events play an integral role
in implementing IL-4 signal transduction.
Three members of the Janus kinase family, Jak1, Jak2, and Jak3, and the
Fes proto-oncogene product are the only tyrosine kinases that have been
reported to become tyrosine phosphorylated and/or activated in response
to IL-4 stimulation in different cell systems (24-28). While
IL-4-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation and activation of Jak1, Jak3,
and Fes has been demonstrated in many cell systems (24-27),
phosphorylation of Jak2 has only been reported to occur in human colon
carcinoma cells (28). It has been demonstrated that IL-4 stimulation
induces Jak1 and Fes association with IL-4R, while Jak3 has been
shown to interact with IL-2R
(24-27). Cotransfection studies in COS
cells and in vitro experiments have indicated that both Jak1
and Jak3 are able to associate with and mediate tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 and IRS-2 (29, 30). However, it has not been
determined which, if any, of these kinases are involved in mediating
IL-4-induced phosphorylation of downstream signaling substrates under
physiological conditions. In the present study, we have utilized a
mutant HeLa cell line, originally isolated based on its lack of
interferon responsiveness, that is deficient in Jak1 expression and its
parental counterpart that does express Jak1 (31, 32) to determine if
this tyrosine kinase is responsible for mediating IL-4-induced
tyrosine phosphorylation events in vivo.
The 1D4 and E1C3 HeLa cell lines have been previously described (31, 32). The human T lymphoid Jurkat cell line was a kind gift from Dr. L. Samelson, and the human monocytic U937 and B lymphoid Ramos cell lines were obtained from the ATCC. Human recombinant IL-4 was obtained from Peprotech and insulin was from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. Murine anti-Jak1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) was obtained from Signal Transduction Laboratories, anti-phosphotyrosine mAb, anti-Jak2, and anti-Jak3 sera were from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc., and anti-Fes mAb was from Oncogene Sciences. The phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated IL-4 fluorokine receptor reagent kit was obtained from R & D Systems. Rabbit anti-IRS-1 and anti-IRS-2 sera were generated by immunization of rabbits with baculovirus-expressed rat IRS-1 protein or an IRS-2-specific peptide comprised of amino acid residues 1310 to 1322 (LSHHLKEATVVKE), respectively. The anti-IRS-1 serum very weakly recognizes IRS-2, while anti-IRS-2 serum does not recognize IRS-1. The anti-Stat6 peptide serum used for immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis was raised against amino acid residues 787-804 (GEDIFPPLLPPTEQDLTK) of human Stat6.
Flow CytometryThe adherent 1D4 and E1C3 HeLa cell lines were treated with 0.5 mM EDTA to facilitate their removal from the substrate. HeLa and Ramos cells were washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and resuspended at 5 × 106 cells/ml. PE-conjugated IL-4 (10 µl) was added to 25 µl of washed cells. As a negative control, 20 µl of anti-human IL-4 neutralizing antibody was mixed with 10 µl of PE-conjugated IL-4 and incubated for 15 min at room temperature before addition to the cell suspensions. Samples were incubated for 2 h at 16 °C and washed twice with PBS containing 0.1% NaN3. Flow cytometry was performed on a FACScan (Becton-Dickenson).
Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblot AnalysisHeLa cells were washed twice and starved for 4 h in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 5 µg/ml transferrin and 10 nM selenium. After stimulation with IL-4 or insulin (100 ng/ml) for 10 min at 37 °C, cells were diluted in PBS containing 100 µM Na3VO4. The cells were then lysed in buffer containing 50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.5), 1% Triton X-100, 50 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaF, 10 mM NaPPi, 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 10 µg/ml pepstatin. The total protein content of the lysates was determined by the Bio-Rad protein assay. Equal amounts of clarified cell lysates (0.5-1 mg) were immunoprecipitated with different antisera (1:500) plus 30 µl of protein G-coupled Sepharose (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.). Immunoprecipitates were washed three times with lysis buffer, solubilized with Laemmli buffer, boiled, and resolved by 8% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE).
For direct immunoblot analysis, proteins from lysates of the various
cell lines (200 µg) were directly resolved by SDS-PAGE without prior
serum starvation. Immunoblot analysis was performed by transferring
separated proteins onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane
(Immobilon-P; Millipore) in Tris-glyceride buffer containing 20%
methanol. The membrane was then treated for 1-2 h with 3% non-fat dry
milk in TTBS (20 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.5), 154 mM
NaCl, 0.05% Tween, 0.05% NaN3), incubated with antibodies
in TTBS containing 0.5% BSA (TTBS-BSA) for 1 to 2 h
(concentration of antibodies: 2 µg/ml for anti-Tyr(P) and 1:500 for
the remaining antisera) and reacted with 125I-labeled
protein A (3 × 105 cpm/µl) in TTBS-BSA for 1 h. Alternatively, bound antibody was detected by enhanced
chemiluminescence according to the manufacturer's protocol (Amersham
Corp.). All procedures were done at room temperature, and membranes
were washed extensively with TTBS after each treatment. After the final
wash, the membrane was rinsed with distilled water, air dried and
autoradiographed with an intensifying screen at 70 °C.
DNA oligonucleotide
probes used in the electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) were
annealed, labeled, purified, and whole cell extracts were prepared for
EMSA essentially as described previously (14-16, 33). The sequence of
one strand of the double-stranded I probe used for EMSA was
5
-GATCTAACTTCCCAAGAACAG-3
. Briefly, 1D4 and E1C3 cells were
serum-starved overnight and treated for 10 min with IL-4 (100 ng/ml).
Cells were washed once with PBS containing 100 µM
Na3VO4 and solubilized in gel shift lysis
buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0), 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 10%
glycerol, 100 µM EDTA, 50 mM NaF, 167 mM NaCl, 100 µM
Na3VO4, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 400 µM dimethyl sulfoxide, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 µg/ml
leupeptin, and 1 µg/ml pepstatin) by incubation on ice for 1 h
and vortexing three to five times. Lysates were cleared by
centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 10 min, and protein concentrations
were determined. For EMSA, 5 µg of whole cell lysate were incubated
with the 32P-labeled I
probe in 20 mM HEPES
(pH 7.9), 40 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 100 µM EDTA, 500 µM dithiothreitol, 6.0%
glycerol, 1 mg/ml BSA, and 100 µg/ml poly(dI-dC) for 15 min.
Complexes were subsequently fractionated on 0.22 × TBE (100 mM Tris borate (pH 8.0), 2 mM EDTA) 4.5%
acrylamide gels.
E1C3 cells (4 × 106) were plated in a 10-mm tissue culture dish 24 h before transfection in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. Cells were transfected with 10 µg of a retroviral expression vector containing murine JAK1 cDNA (a kind gift from Dr. Warren Leonard) and 40 µg of carrier DNA using the calcium phosphate method. Eighteen hours after transfection, cells were washed and incubated in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal calf serum for 7-12 h. Cells were then serum-starved as described previously and used for subsequent experiments.
To confirm that parental 1D4 HeLa cells expressed Jak1 and that
mutant EIC3 HeLa cells were Jak1-deficient, whole cell lysates were
prepared and subjected to immunoblot analysis utilizing an anti-Jak1
mAb. A 130-kDa protein was readily expressed in 1D4 cells, while no
protein in this size range was observed in EIC3 cells (Fig.
1A). The 130-kDa protein was also detected in
Jurkat cells that are known to express Jak1 (Fig. 1A). The
status of Jak2, Jak3, and Fes expression in the two Hela cell lines was also examined by immunoblot analysis, since these tyrosine kinases have
also been demonstrated to become tyrosine phosphorylated in response to
IL-4 treatment (24, 25, 27, 28). Anti-Jak2 serum recognized a 130-kDa
protein in Jurkat, 1D4, and EIC3 cells (Fig. 1A). A Jak2
degradation product of 97 kDa was also observed in all three lines.
Anti-Jak3 serum specifically detected the expression of a 120-kDa
protein in Jurkat cells, while no protein in this size range was
observed in either 1D4 or E1C3 cells (Fig. 1A). A 92-kDa
protein was detected in human U937 myeloid cells that are known to
express Fes but not in 1D4 or E1C3 cells utilizing an anti-Fes mAb
(Fig. 1A). Thus, mutant EIC3 cells do not detectably express
Jak1, Jak3, or Fes but do express Jak2.
IL-4Rs have been detected on a wide variety of hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic cell types at levels ranging from 100 to 5000 sites per cell (2-4). In order to compare IL-4-induced signal transduction events in the 1D4 and E1C3 cell lines, it was necessary to determine whether these lines expressed receptors capable of binding IL-4. As shown in Fig. 1B, 1D4 and E1C3 cells specifically bound PE-conjugated human IL-4. The human B Ramos cell line, which is known to express high levels of IL-4Rs (2), was also found to specifically bind PE-conjugated human IL-4. These results demonstrate that mutant E1C3 cells and their 1D4 parental counterpart express detectable levels of cell surface IL-4Rs.
The ability of IL-4 to induce tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 and
IRS-2 in 1D4 and E1C3 was next examined. Cells were serum starved and
either untreated or stimulated with IL-4 or insulin. Insulin treatment
was performed because it is known to mediate potent tyrosine
phosphorylation of IRS molecules, and evidence suggests that activated
insulin receptors directly associate with and phosphorylate these
substrates (34-36). Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with
antiserum specific for either IRS-1 or IRS-2 and subsequently subjected
to immunoblot analysis utilizing anti-phosphotyrosine. IL-4 treatment
of 1D4 cells resulted in pronounced tyrosine phosphorylation of both
IRS-1 and IRS-2, while no detectable phosphorylation of either
substrate was observed in E1C3 cells in response to IL-4 stimulation
(Fig. 2A and B). However, insulin
treatment led to equivalent increases in the phosphotyrosine content of
IRS-1 and IRS-2 molecules in both cell lines. Immunoblot analysis of
the same samples with either anti-IRS-1 or anti-IRS-2 serum revealed that equivalent amounts of IRS proteins were present in each
immunoprecipitate and that IRS expression was similar in both cell
lines.2 These results strongly suggest that
IL-4-induced IRS-1 and IRS-2 phosphorylation is mediated through
activation of Jak1, while insulin-induced IRS phosphorylation does not
require Jak1 expression.
It has been established that IL-4 induces tyrosine phosphorylation of
Stat6 and binding of Stat6 to a specific DNA consensus sequence,
TTCC(A > T,N)GGAA (13-16). To determine if Jak1 expression is
required for mediating these events, we first analyzed whether IL-4
could induce tyrosine phosphorylation of Stat6 in the two HeLa cell
lines. Lysates prepared from untreated or IL-4-stimulated cells were
immunoprecipitated with antiserum specific for human Stat6, proteins
were separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred proteins were subjected to
immunoblot analysis utilizing anti-phosphotyrosine. While IL-4
stimulation of 1D4 cells resulted in evident tyrosine phosphorylation
of a 100-kDa protein specifically recognized by anti-Stat6 serum, no
tyrosine-phosphorylated protein in this size range was detected in
response to IL-4 treatment of E1C3 cells (Fig.
3A). Immunoblot analysis of the same
immunoprecipitated lysates with anti-Stat6 serum demonstrated that
Stat6 expression levels were comparable in the 1D4 and E1C3 cell lines
(Fig. 3B).
Stat6 can be distinguished from other Stat proteins by its ability to
bind to a specific consensus sequence found in the immunoglobulin heavy
chain germ line promotor of the IL-4-responsive human C gene,
designated I
. To determine whether IL-4 could induce Stat6 binding
activity in 1D4 and E1C3 cells, whole cell extracts from untreated or
IL-4-treated cells were prepared and assayed for the induction of
32P-labeled I
DNA binding activity by EMSA. IL-4
stimulation of 1D4 cells led to rapid induction of I
binding, while
no detectable binding activity could be observed after IL-4 treatment
of E1C3 cells (Fig. 3C). Thus, Jak1 expression appears to be
required for mediating IL-4-induced Stat6 activation.
Since the E1C3 cell line was derived by mutagenesis with
ethylmethane-sulfonate (31), it remained possible that other functional defects could account for the inability of IL-4 to mediate tyrosine phosphorylation events in these cells. Therefore, a mammalian expression vector containing murine Jak1 cDNA was transiently transfected into E1C3 cells (E1C3/Jak1). Immunoblot analysis revealed that Jak1 protein levels attained in E1C3/Jak1 cells were equivalent to
those in 1D4 cells (Fig. 4A). The E1C3/Jak1
transfected cells were untreated or stimulated with IL-4 and IRS, and
Stat6 phosphorylation was examined. As shown in Fig. 4, B
and C, the ability of IL-4 to induce tyrosine
phosphorylation of IRS-1, IRS-2, and Stat6 was restored in the
E1C3/Jak1 transfected cells. The ability of IL-4 to induce binding of
Stat6 to I as determined by EMSA was also reconstituted in the
E1C3/Jak1 cells.3 These data provide
conclusive evidence that Jak1 expression is required for mediating
IL-4-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of both IRS and Stat6 molecules
in the HeLa cell system.
A recent study demonstrated that Jak1 but not Jak2 or Tyk2 expression
is crucial for IL-4-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS molecules
in a series of mutant derivatives of a human fibroblast cell line, HT
1080 (37). E1C3 cells express Jak2 (see Fig. 1A) and Tyk2
(32), further excluding the possibility that these Janus kinases are
involved in IL-4-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of cellular
substrates. However, our results do not rule out the possibility that
Fes or Jak3 may be capable of evoking IL-4-induced tyrosine
phosphorylation events in other cell types, since these kinases do not
appear to be expressed in 1D4 or E1C3 lines. It has been reported that
Fes expression appears to be limited to cells of the myeloid lineage
(38). Since it is well established that IL-4 affects numerous cell
types other than those of myeloid origin, the role of Fes in mediating IL-4-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of intracellular substrates would
be severely restricted. Jak3 is also preferentially expressed in
hematopoietic cells (39). Moreover, several recent studies have
indicated that IL-2R expression is not necessarily required for IL-4
function (40-43). Since Jak3 has been demonstrated to associate with
IL-2R
(24, 27), this further suggests that it is unlikely that Jak3
is the primary kinase utilized by IL-4 for eliciting its biological
functions. We are presently attempting to express Jak3 and Fes in the
E1C3 line to determine if these kinases can mediate IL-4-directed
tyrosine phosphorylation.
It has been demonstrated that a variety of cytokines and growth factors
activate Jak1 (23). We have obtained preliminary evidence that
interferon-- and -
-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS
molecules requires Jak1 expression.4 It
will be of interest to determine whether other cytokines require Jak1
to direct tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS molecules or other substrates
under physiological conditions. If so, this would suggest that Jak1
plays a central role in mediating signal transduction through multiple
non-tyrosine kinase-containing receptors. In summary, our study
strongly suggests that Jak1 is the primary kinase that couples with the
IL-4R to initiate tyrosine phosphorylation of critical effector
molecules involved in mediating IL-4 elicited signal transduction.