(Received for publication, September 20, 1996, and in revised form, December 4, 1996)
From Molecular Genetics, Institute of Biochemistry, University of Frankfurt, Marie-Curie-Straße 9, D-60439 Frankfurt, Germany
The gene coding for subunit IV of the cytochrome
c oxidase in Paracoccus denitrificans has been
cloned and sequenced. The derived amino acid sequence shows no
significant homology to any known protein. Gene deletion has no
consequences for the integrity of the complex and its spectral and
enzymatic properties. Complementation of the deletion mutant in
trans results in expression of subunit IV; sequence analysis of
the 5-noncoding region leads to the identification of a putative
promoter sequence.
Cytochrome c oxidase (cytochrome aa3; E.C.1.9.3.1) is one of the terminal oxidases in Paracoccus denitrificans (for reviews, see Refs. 1-3). Subunit I contains three redox active centers, heme a and the binuclear site (heme a3·CuB). CuA, the entry point for electrons from cytochrome c, is located in subunit II which represents the predominant binding site for this electron donor. The electrons are transferred from CuA to heme a and then to the binuclear site where the oxygen reduction takes place. The function of subunit III is still obscure. All three subunits show strong homologies to the mitochondrially coded subunits of the eukaryotic enzyme.
Several years ago, Haltia discovered a small polypeptide copurifying with the oxidase, which was partially sequenced (4, 5). A fourth component was found in the crystalline oxidase as well (6), and this small subunit could be characterized from the x-ray structure (7) as a polypeptide consisting of a single transmembrane helix and an N terminus protruding into the cytoplasmic space.
Here we present the isolation and analysis of the gene coding for this fourth subunit. In addition, the purified 3-subunit enzyme complex resulting from a deletion of the gene is characterized. Furthermore, evidence for a putative promoter sequence is shown.
The N-terminal sequence
of the putative subunit IV (4) was taken to synthesize two degenerate
oligonucleotides: primer A4U (5-GCRAASGCSGCYTGYTG-3
) and primer A4D
(5
-CAYCAYGAWATCACSGA-3
), the latter one as the reverse
complement.
General cloning techniques and DNA
manipulations were performed essentially as described in Ref. 8.
Genomic DNA was obtained from P. denitrificans
1222 as described earlier (9). Polymerase chain reaction was used to
amplify P. denitrificans genomic DNA with the primers A4D
and A4U with an annealing temperature of 55 °C. The sequence of the
65-bp1 fragment obtained by polymerase
chain reaction was used to synthesize a 30-mer oligonucleotide which
was labeled with a dCTP/Dig-(11)-dUTP-tail for Southern and colony
hybridization, which were performed as described by the manufacturer
(Boehringer Mannheim) with a hybridization temperature of 42 °C. A
1.9-kbp EcoRI/SphI and later a 3.8-kbp SacII/SalI fragment were isolated from a partial
gene library derived from genomic digests with the respective enzymes.
The second fragment was then cloned into pUC18 as a
HindIII/SalI fragment (pHW5; see Fig. 2).
Subcloning of various fragments, exo/mung digestion, and synthesis of
specific primers were applied for sequence determination, using
double-stranded DNA and T7 polymerase with 7-deaza-dGTP as described by
the manufacturer (Pharmacia), according to the dideoxynucleotide chain
termination method of Sanger (10).
Construction of Deletion Mutants and Complementation
The
815-bp EcoRI/AscI fragment from pHW5 (see Fig. 2)
was replaced by the 1.1-kb kanamycin resistance gene from pHP45 (11) resulting in pHW14. The HindIII/SalI fragment of
pHW14 was then ligated blunt-end into the SmaI site of the
suicide vector pRVS1 (12) leading to pHW15 which was mated into PD1222.
Homologous recombinants were selected for kanamycin resistance and loss
of
-galactosidase activity. Two representative strains HW
1/24 and 55 (see Fig. 3A) were characterized; for all subsequent
steps, HW
1/24 was used and referred to as HW
1.
Complementation Constructs
The promoterless broad host
range vector pRG2 was used to complement
HW1 with different fragments for promoter probe studies. The 683-bp
PvuII fragment and the 1.7-kb
EcoRI/SalI fragment of pHW5 were ligated into
pRG, resulting in pHW21 and pHW22, respectively (see Fig. 2). These
were used to complement HW
1 leading to HWK21 and HWK22.
P. denitrificans strain PD1222
(13) and the deletion strain HW1 (see above) were grown on TY medium
for DNA isolation or on succinate medium (14) for enzyme isolation,
including kanamycin (50 µg/ml), where appropriate. Complemented
strains were grown in the presence of streptomycin sulfate (25 µg/ml). Membrane isolation, enzyme purification, sodium dodecyl
sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and cytochrome
difference spectra were performed as described in Ref. 15. Western
blots were performed with monoclonal antibodies directed against
subunit IV (6).
All
spectra were recorded on an Uvikon 941 (Kontron Instruments) between
380 and 650 nm. Difference spectra of cytochrome a and
cytochrome a3 were performed as follows: 10 µl
of a 10 mM potassium ferricyanide solution were added to
700 µl of a 3 µM oxidase solution. The sample was
divided between two cuvettes. The sample cuvette was incubated with 20 µl of 350 mM KCN for 2 h. All volume changes were
balanced with buffer in the reference cuvette, and absolute spectra
recorded. In the next step, N,N,N,N
-tetramethyl-1,4-phenylenediamine and ascorbate were added to the sample cuvette to a final concentration of 60 µM and 2 mM, respectively. The
reference was reduced with dithionite. Again absolute spectra were
measured, and difference spectra calculated according to Ref. 16.
Carbon monoxide difference spectra were obtained by subtracting the
dithionite-reduced from the (reduced + CO) sample spectrum.
The spectrophotometric assay was performed at 25 °C with reduced horse heart cytochrome c at 20 µM as described before (15).
Polymerase chain reaction with two
degenerate primers derived from the N terminus of the putative fourth
subunit lead to the isolation of a 65-bp fragment yielding an amino
acid sequence identical to the published N terminus (5). This sequence
was taken to synthesize a labeled 30-mer oligonucleotide which
hybridized to a 1.9-kb EcoRI/SphI and a 3.8-kb
SacII/SalI fragment from two partial gene
libraries. Sequence analysis of both strands (Figs. 1
and 2) lead to the identification of the gene encoding
subunit IV, the ctaH locus. The open reading frame codes for
a polypeptide of 50 amino acids (Fig. 1) while the mature protein lacks
the N-terminal methionine (4, 5). A molecular mass of 5364 daltons is
calculated for the mature form, which is in good agreement with its
migration behavior on SDS gels (see Fig.
3A).
Construction of the Mutant Deleted in Subunit IV and Characterization of the Mutant Oxidase Complex
In the cloned
3.8-kb HindIII/SalI fragment, the ctaH
gene plus 170 bp of the upstream and 380 bp of the downstream sequence were replaced by the kanamycin resistance gene, offering flanking regions of 2.1 and 0.95 kb for homologous recombination. After conjugation into PD1222, strains were selected for resistance to
kanamycin and for loss of -galactosidase activity. Membranes of two
putative deletion strains were tested for the loss subunit IV using
monoclonal antibodies (Fig. 3A). Subunit IV is not expressed in either of the deletion mutants HW
1/24 or 55. Loss of the gene was
also confirmed by Southern blot analysis (data not shown).
Deletion of the fourth subunit does not affect the assembly of the
remaining 3 larger subunits. An intact 3-subunit enzyme complex can be
isolated from HW1. On SDS gels all 3 subunits are visualized with
their normal migration behavior (not shown). The enzyme was then
characterized further to check whether the loss of subunit IV has any
consequences on the enzymatic properties of the oxidase. Measuring the
catalytic activity revealed no differences for the turnover numbers for
the 3- and 4-subunit (wild type) enzymes. The turnover numbers at 20 µM cytochrome c are 418 s
1 for
wild type and 404 s
1 for HW
1. Any direct influence of
subunit IV on proton pumping can be excluded as well since it was shown
that the wild type and a 2-subunit complex (lacking subunits III and
IV) exhibit similar energy-transducing capabilities (17). Spectral
analysis of ligand-bound oxidase, using cyanide or carbon monoxide, was carried out to look for changes in the heme surroundings. Fig. 4 presents the results of the cyanide spectra. No
differences are observed for the 4-subunit and 3-subunit mutant complex
in the heme a or a3 contribution. This is confirmed by the
CO spectra (data not shown).
Complementation Studies
To address the question whether the
coding region of ctaH is preceded by a promoter of its own,
two different fragments containing the ctaH locus were
cloned into the promoterless broad host range vector pRG (see Fig. 2).
Apart from their 3-end they also differ in the length of the upstream
sequence. The PvuII fragment comprises 285 bp upstream while
the EcoRI site is located 170 bp upstream of the start
codon. The two plasmids were used to complement HW
1. Membranes of
complemented strains were tested with antibodies against subunit IV.
Fig. 3B demonstrates that in both constructs subunit IV is
expressed from its own promoter to an extent comparable to wild
type.
The gene ctaH encoding subunit IV of the P. denitrificans cytochrome c oxidase was isolated and analyzed. Fifty amino acids were derived from the DNA sequence but the N-terminal methionine does not appear in the mature protein. According to the crystal structure, residues 16-47 form a transmembrane helix (7). Surprisingly, a lysine residue is found within this helical region, with its side chain protruding into the hydrophobic membrane phase. In a sequence comparison, no similarity with other known subunits of bacterial quinol and cytochrome c oxidases was found, nor any significant homology to any other known protein.
Deletion of the fourth subunit leads to the isolation of a 3-subunit enzyme complex which is obviously not affected by the loss in its functional properties. The catalytic activity is the same for wild type and the 3-subunit enzyme, indicating that subunit IV has no influence on the electron transfer reactions. In addition, both heme centers are left intact as judged from cyanide and carbon monoxide spectra which reveal no difference to wild type. The isolation of a functional 2-subunit complex from wild type membranes, leaving the two smallest subunits behind (17, 18), is additional evidence that the two smallest subunits are not directly involved in functions of electron transport or energy transduction. Unlike the deletion of the gene (ctaE) for subunit III (19), which leads to a heterogeneous population of oxidase complexes in the membrane in vivo, our data rule out the possibility that the ctaH gene product acts as an assembly factor.
These results do not coincide with the general functional assignment and importance of subunits IV in quinol oxidases (20), but may be explained by obvious structural differences. Although the location of the fourth subunit of the cytochrome oxidase of P. denitrificans and the quinol oxidase of Escherichia coli in a cleft between subunits I and III seems to be basically similar (see below), they clearly differ in length, with only one helix for the cytochrome oxidase but three for the quinol oxidase subunit. Investigation of the role of the fourth subunit of the quinol oxidase of E. coli revealed that the in vitro removal does not affect the catalytic activity (21), while deletion of the complete cyoD gene or parts of its C terminus result in defects of assembly or of CuB insertion (20). It could be shown that only the C-terminal two-thirds of this subunit are required for the functional expression of the quinol oxidase. Recently, a projection map obtained from two-dimensional crystalline arrays of cytochrome bo3 was fitted to the Paracoccus structure, showing that subunit IV of cytochrome bo3 basically maintains the same position as subunit IV of cytochrome aa3.3
In contrast to previous assumptions (7), subunit IV is slightly shorter (49 instead of 56 amino acids). The N-terminal half of this subunit makes extensive contacts with residues in subunits I and III, while no protein contacts are seen for the upper half of the transmembrane helix, pointing to the periplasm; in this region a tightly bound phospholipid molecule is in close vicinity to all four subunits and establishes a number of contacts with subunits I, III, and IV. This nicely explains the fact that, upon genetic deletion or in vitro removal of subunit III, subunit IV is lost along with subunit III. An interesting question is whether subunit IV is under the control of its own promoter, or part of a larger transcriptional unit. To test this, promoter probe studies were carried out. Cloning two different fragments into the promoterless vector pRG leads to expression of subunit IV. As both contain at least the first 170 bp upstream of the start codon, this is clear evidence that a promoter must be located within this region.
Fig. 5 suggests a promoter sequence about 90 bp upstream
of the translational start (see also Fig. 1). This 10/
35 region is
compared to 5 promoter regions mapped in P. denitrificans, and is in agreement with corresponding putative sequences of 14 other
Paracoccus genes4 as well as
with an earlier suggestion (22).
In summary, we have shown that subunit IV in the cytochrome aa3 from P. denitrificans can be excluded to (i) act as an assembly factor, (ii) be required for cofactor insertion, or (iii), being in contact with subunits I and III, should provide some general stabilization of the complex (7). While the considerably larger subunit IV of quinol oxidases obviously is strictly required during the assembly process, the single transmembrane helix of this subunit in the P. denitrificans cytochrome c oxidase may be speculated to be an evolutionary remnant.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) Y08372[GenBank].
Monoclonal antibodies directed against subunit IV were kindly donated by Christian Ostermeier (MPI, Frankfurt). We thank Oliver Richter for stimulating discussions and So Iwata and Axel Harrenga (both at MPI) for providing detailed information on the crystal structure, and we are grateful to Hans-Werner Müller for technical assistance.