Upstream Stimulatory Factor-2 (USF2) Activity Is Required for Glucose Stimulation of L-Pyruvate Kinase Promoter Activity in Single Living Islet beta -Cells*

(Received for publication, March 5, 1997, and in revised form, June 3, 1997)

Helen J. Kennedy , Benoit Viollet Dagger , Imran Rafiq , Axel Kahn Dagger and Guy A. Rutter §

From the Department of Biochemistry, School of Medical Sciences, University Walk, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, United Kingdom and the Dagger  Institut Cochin de Génétique Moléculaire, U. 129 INSERM, Université René Descartes, 24, rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75 014 Paris, France

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Elevated glucose concentrations stimulate L-pyruvate kinase (L-PK) gene transcription in liver and islet beta -cells. A glucose response element termed the L4 box (two noncanonical E-boxes located -165 and -154 base pairs upstream of the transcriptional start point) has previously been defined within the proximal promoter region of the gene. However, the identity of the transacting factor(s) which binds to this site remains unclear. We have used photon counting digital imaging of firefly luciferase activity to monitor promoter activity continuously in single living islet beta  and derived INS-1 cells, and to analyze the molecular basis of the regulation by glucose. L-PK promoter activity, normalized to cytomegalovirus promoter activity using the distinct Renilla reniformis luciferase, was >= 6-fold higher in cells cultured at 16 mM glucose or above compared with cells cultured at 3 mM glucose. Microinjection of antibodies against the ubiquitous transcription factor USF2 inhibited L-PK promoter activity in beta - and INS-1 cells incubated at 30 mM glucose by 71-87%. Anti-USF2 antibodies had a much smaller effect on promoter activity in INS-1 cells cultured at 3 mM glucose, and on the activity of a modified promoter construct lacking an L4 box. These data support the view that glucose enhances L-PK gene transcription in beta -cells by modifying the transactivational capacity of USF2 bound to the upstream L4 box.


INTRODUCTION

Increases in extracellular glucose concentration stimulate transcription of the L-pyruvate kinase (L-PK)1 gene in liver and islet beta -cells (1, 2). This effect is mediated by a cis-acting DNA sequence termed the L4 box centered 160 base pairs upstream of the transcriptional start site (3-5) and consisting of a tandem repeat of non-canonical E-boxes (underlined) as follows: 5'-CACGGGGCACTCCCGTG-3'. This site appears also to confer glucose responsiveness on the L-PK promoter in islet beta -cells (6). Oligonucleotides derived from this sequence bind to major-late transcription factor or USF (upstream stimulatory factor), a ubiquitous member of the basic helix-loop-helix and leucine zipper (LZ) family (7). Members of this family form dimers through the interaction of helix-loop-helix and leucine zipper motifs, and then bind to cognate sites on DNA via their basic regions. Two forms of USF, USF1 (43 kDa) and USF2 (44 kDa), were first identified in HeLa cells (8, 9) and are encoded by separate genes (9-12). Furthermore, alternative splice variants of USF2, USF2a, and USF2b have recently been identified, while heterodimers of USF1 and USF2a appear to represent the predominant form in vivo (13). Consistent with a role for USF in the response of the L-PK promoter to glucose in hepatocytes, the expression of truncated USF proteins lacking the DNA-binding domain inhibits the stimulation of promoter activity by glucose, probably by dimerizing non-productively with endogenous USF (14).

To provide a more specific assay of the role of USF in the transcriptional activation of the L-PK gene in the beta -cell type, we have developed a technique whereby the activity of the L-PK promoter can be constantly imaged at the single cell level using firefly luciferase. Simultaneous measurement of the activity of a second reporter protein, luciferase from the sea flower Renilla reniformis, then allows L-PK promoter activity to be normalized to the activity of a constitutive viral promoter. We report here that inhibition of USF2 function with specific antibodies microinjected directly into the nucleus of living clonal beta -cells (INS-1) substantially prevents the induction of L-PK gene transcription by glucose. This combination of techniques should provide a general means with which to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the control of transcription in living cells.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

Beetle luciferin (K+ salt) was obtained from Promega Ltd., United Kingdom, and coelenterazine from Molecular Probes, or was a gift from Dr. B. Sherf (Promega). Bovine serum albumin solutions of predefined density were obtained from Dr. R. F. L. James (Leicester, UK). Collagenase (Pan Plus) was from Serva (Wokingham, UK). Rabbit polyclonal antisera to USF2 was raised as described earlier (13), or was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Antibodies were lyophilized and microdialyzed versus 10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 0.2 mM EDTA, and quantitated by Bradford assay (15) with bovine serum albumin as standard. Plasmid pRL.CMV, containing cDNA encoding Renilla luciferase, was purchased from Promega.

Plasmid Construction

A fragment of the L-PK gene corresponding to the region -183 to +10 nucleotides with respect to the transcriptional start site was subcloned from plasmid 183PKCAT (16) via flanking KpnI and XhoI sites into plasmid pGL3.basic (Promega). The resulting plasmid (p.LPK.LucFF) contained a modified version of the firefly luciferase cDNA gene, lacking the three amino acid C-terminal peroxisomal targeting sequence, and engineered for optimal codon usage in mammalian cells (17). Use of the modified construct provides 10-50-fold greater firefly luciferase synthesis compared with the unmodified cDNA.2 A plasmid which lacked the L4 box containing the putative USF-binding sites (pDelta L4-LPK.LucFF) was generated by polymerase chain reaction amplification of base pairs -148 to +10 from plasmid 183PKCAT, using primers: 5'-TTTTAGATCTGTTCCTGGACTCTGGCCC-3' (BglII site underlined) and 5'-TTTTAAGCTTGTTGCTTACCTGCTGTGT-3' (HindIII site underlined). Standard molecular biology cloning procedures were followed (18) and all plasmids were purified on CsCl gradients.

Isolation of Primary Islet beta -Cells

Rat islets were isolated from adult males (220-250 g) by in situ collagenase digestion, followed by purification on a discontinuous bovine serum albumin gradient (19). Islets were dissociated into single cells by incubation for 2 min, at 20-22 °C in modified, nominally Ca2+-free Krebs-Ringer-bicarbonate medium (20) containing trypsin (Type XI, Sigma; 0.5 mg·ml-1). Cells (0.5 × 106/ml) were then resuspended in serum-free modified Eagle's medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) and seeded as a 50-µl droplet onto plastic Petri dishes (35 mm diameter, Corning) coated with poly-L-ornithine (0.05 mg·ml-1) and poly-L-lysine (0.012 mg·ml-1) or Cell-Tak 228 (1:5 dilution; Becton-Dickinson, Bedford, MA). After allowing 5-30 min for cell adherence, culture was continued for 16 h at 37 °C in 2 ml of modified Eagle's medium plus 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum, 100 IU penicillin and 100 µg of streptomycin·ml-1, in the presence of 5% CO2.

Culture of INS-1 Cells

Prior to microinjection, cells were cultured for 48 h on 24-mm diameter poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips as described previously (21).

Microinjection and Cell Imaging

Intranuclear pressure microinjection was performed using an Eppendorf 5172 transjector as described before (20, 22). IgG and anti-USF2 antibodies were always microinjected into cells on adjacent areas in the same coverslip to ensure identical culture and imaging conditions.

Cell imaging was performed at 37 °C using intensified charge-coupled device cameras (Hamamatsu C2400-40; Hamamatsu Photonics, Welwyn, Herts, UK; Photek ICCD216; Photek Ltd., East Sussex, St. Leonards-on-Sea, Sussex, UK) attached to the lower port of a Zeiss Axiovert 100 microscope with 10 × 0.5 NA objective (Hamamatsu) (22) or an Olympus IX-70 microscope with 10 × 0.4 NA objective (Photek). Other details are given in the figure legends.


RESULTS

Effects of Extracellular Glucose Concentration on L-PK Promoter Activity in Primary Islet beta -Cells

To assess the dependence upon extracellular glucose concentration of L-PK promoter activity we microinjected cells with a mixture of the pLPK.LucFF construct and a second plasmid (pRL.CMV) providing constitutive expression of R. reniformis luciferase. We chose microinjection over other transfection approaches since this (i) allows a large number (100-1000) of copies of each plasmid to be introduced directly into cell nuclei, providing sufficient synthesis of reporter protein to allow its detection in single cells (22) and (ii) permits the introduction of other molecules such as antibodies at the same time.

Whereas firefly luciferase uses luciferin as cofactor, Renilla luciferase oxidizes only coelenterazine (23). These specificities were retained in living cells, with neither enzyme, when expressed alone, showing any activity except in the presence of its cognate substrate (data not shown). When beta -cells were microinjected with pLPK.LucFF plus pRL.CMV and incubated 16 h at either 3 or 16 mM glucose, cells maintained at the higher glucose concentration displayed a 6-fold higher ratio of firefly to Renilla luciferase activity compared with those at 3 mM glucose (Fig. 1). This change can be ascribed entirely to enhanced transcription of the L-PK promoter, since any nonspecific alterations in basal transcriptional or translational efficiency are normalized (with Renilla luciferase). Furthermore, this effect of glucose was mediated by the L4 box of the L-PK promoter, since glucose was ineffective in altering the transcriptional activity of a truncated promoter lacking this element (pDelta L4-LPK.LucFF; firefly:Renilla luciferase activity ratio 0.034 ± 0.013, n = 10 cells, and 0.020 ± 0.01, n = 11, after incubation for 24 h at 3 and 16 mM glucose, respectively).


Fig. 1. Effect of glucose concentration on L-PK promoter activity in single isolated islet beta -cells. Primary islet beta -cells in medium containing 3 mM glucose were microinjected with plasmids pLPK.LucFF and pRL.CMV (0.3 mg·ml-1 each) then culture continued for 16 h in complete medium in the presence of either 3 or 16 mM glucose. The medium was removed, and after rinsing with 1 × phosphate-buffered saline, was replaced with 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline supplemented with 1 mM beetle luciferin. Images were acquired simultaneously in "slice" and "gravity" mode, for 15 min, under × 10 magnification. Coelenterazine (5 µM) was then added and imaging repeated. Photons released in the presence of luciferin and coelenterazine, respectively, provide quantitation of L-PK and CMV promoter activity in the individual cells (see the text). The transmitted light image was digitally enhanced using the Argus-50 software.
[View Larger Version of this Image (102K GIF file)]

Effects of USF1/2 Inhibition on L-PK Promoter Activity in Primary beta -Cells

To determine whether isoforms of USF may be involved in the response to glucose we comicroinjected either an antibody (USF-G) raised to the 49-amino acid N-terminal domain of USF2a/b or control IgG. This domain may be involved in transactivation by USF (24). In three separate experiments, the ratio of firefly:Renilla luciferase activity was lowered 3 h after injection from 0.63 ± 0.009 × 10-2 (n = 12 cells) to 0.08 ± 0.0001 × 10-2 (n = 16) in the presence of the microinjected antibody (86.7% inhibition).

These experiments demonstrated that monitoring glucose-regulated gene expression with single microinjected beta -cells was feasible and implicated USF1/2 in the effects of glucose. To achieve a detailed analysis of the regulation of the L-PK promoter in a large and homogeneous cell population we turned to highly differentiated INS-1 beta -cells (21, 25) whose flattened morphology (Figs. 2 and 3) facilitated microinjection.


Fig. 2. Time course of L-PK promoter-dependent firefly luciferase expression in microinjected INS1 cells. A, approximately 120 cells cultured on a plastic dish were microinjected with plasmid pLPK.LucFF (0.3 mg·ml-1). Beetle luciferin (K+-salt, 1 mM) was then added and the glucose concentration increased to 30 mM. The cells were then placed on the thermostated (37 °C) stage of the microscope and images (15-min integration) acquired at the times shown. B, the change in photon release as a function of time of 16 of the individual cells.
[View Larger Version of this Image (67K GIF file)]


Fig. 3. Effect of glucose concentration on L-PK promoter activity in single INS-1 cells. INS-1 cells were microinjected and imaged after 16 h culture at the glucose concentrations shown, as described in the legend to Fig. 1. Shown is a small (50 × 50 µm) area of the total field of view.
[View Larger Version of this Image (101K GIF file)]

L-PK Promoter Activity Can Be followed in Real Time in Single INS-1 Cells

Using photon counting digital imaging in the presence of luciferin alone it was possible to follow the kinetics of the increase in luciferase luminescence from individual living INS-1 cells immediately after their microinjection with pLPK.LucFF (Fig. 2A). Quantitation of photon release at different times after microinjection demonstrated a biphasic increase in photon production, with the majority of cells displaying a peak in luciferase expression 4-8 h after microinjection (Fig. 2B). This biphasic pattern may reflect a balance between the synthesis of luciferase, and the degradation of the injected plasmid. Supporting this view, the kinetics of expression of Renilla luciferase under constitutive CMV promoter control were broadly similar, reaching a peak 8 h after injection (data not shown). The rate of appearance of either luciferase, and the maximum luminescence achieved, varied considerably between different cells, probably reflecting variations in: (i) the amount of the plasmid introduced, (ii) responsiveness to glucose (pLPK.LucFF only), and (iii) basal transcriptional activity. Subsequent experiments were therefore performed after comicroinjection with plasmid pRL.CMV to allow these intercellular variations to be normalized.

Increases in Extracellular Glucose Concentration Activate the L-PK Promoter Activity in INS-1 Cells

In line with the responses observed in primary beta -cells, INS-1 cells microinjected with pLPK.LucFF plus pRL.CMV, and subsequently incubated for 16 h at 30 mM glucose, exhibited an 11-fold higher ratio of firefly:Renilla luciferase than cells maintained at 3 mM (Fig. 3).

Effects of Anti-USF2 Antibodies on the Activation by Glucose of L-PK Promoter Activity in INS-1 Cells

To investigate the role of USF2 in the effect of glucose on L-PK promoter activity, we used two antibodies raised against the leucine zipper domain of USF2 proteins. The antibody termed LZ2 (see Ref. 13, Fig. 2A) was raised against amino acids 298-346 of human USF2a corresponding to the entire leucine zipper motif and the antibody termed USF2-SC, developed by Santa Cruz, was directed against amino acids 327-346 including 2 of the 4 leucine residues of the leucine repeat of mouse USF2. This latter antibody also recognizes the analogous epitope in USF1. We analyzed the effects of comicroinjecting these antibodies at the earliest possible time point after microinjection, i.e. 3 h. As shown in Table I, antibodies LZ2 and USF2-SC caused a decrease in the ratio of firefly:Renilla luciferase activity of 85.1 and 70.9%, respectively. Microinjection of these antibodies had no significant effect on L-PK promoter activity in cells maintained at 3 mM glucose (Table I). In addition, antibody USF-G substantially inhibited (74.8%) glucose-dependent L-PK promoter activity. By contrast, an antibody (USF-F) raised to a central epitope of USF2 (residues 143-193 of USF2a, corresponding to residues 76-126 of USF2b) was without effect on apparent activity. However, this antibody inhibited by 77.6% the expression of a luciferase construct (pCol.Luc), bearing the fragment -517 to +63 of the human collagenase promoter (22), which possesses a non-canonical E-box (-408CAGGTG). No significant change in firefly:Renilla luciferase activity was observed in INS-1 cells microinjected with LPK.LucFF using an irrelevant antibody, anti-c-Fos (Table I), nor after microinjection of anti-USF2 antibodies into the cell cytosol (data not shown).

Table I. Effect of microinjection of anti-USF2 antibodies on L-PK promoter activity in individual INS-1 cells

Cells were microinjected with plasmids pLPK.LucFF, or pDelta L4-LPK.LucFF, plus pRL.CMV (0.3 mg·ml-1 each) and antibody (0.9-1.2 mg·ml-1) and incubated 3 h in culture medium containing the glucose concentration shown. Firefly and Renilla luciferase activities were then determined by sequential incubation with luciferin and coelenterazine (Fig. 1). Photon release from individual cells was determined by defining a circular "region of interest" approximately 20 pixel in diameter, around the luminescent area (see Figs. 1 and 3). The ratio (R) of firefly: Renilla luciferase activity expressed in each cell was calculated from center of gravity images according to, R=(<UP>FF</UP>−<UP>bg</UP><SUB>1</SUB>)/(<UP>T</UP>−<UP>FF</UP>), where FF is the number of photons detected in the presence of luciferin alone, and T is the number of photons detected in the simultaneous presence of luciferin and coelenterazine. The background value, bg1, was determined by measuring the mean photon number in three randomly selected areas of the image where no cell was located. Data are given as the mean value for R ± S.E. (×100) for the number of cells given in parentheses (number of cells, number of separate cultures). Where the number of separate cultures is not shown, all cells were from the same culture. Statistical significance was determined by Student's t test assuming equal variance: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001. The extent of inhibition achieved with each antibody is presented as a percentage of the IgG control.

Promoter [glucose] L-PK
 Delta L4-LPK
Collagenase, 30 
3 30 3 30

mM
IgG 1.47  ± 0.29 (54, 2) 9.17  ± 1.98 (62, 2) 2.43  ± 0.56 (132, 3) 0.43  ± 0.05 (118, 2)
USF-2 (SC) 0.96  ± 0.18 (55,  2) 1.37  ± 0.21 (85, 2)*** 1.40  ± 0.30 (137, 3) 0.25  ± 0.03 (102, 2)**
% NSa 85.1 NS 41.9
IgG 7.47  ± 3.56 (23) 9.86  ± 1.35 (61, 4) 8.89  ± 1.14 (57, 2) 2.21  ± 0.31 (98, 3)
LZ2 4.79  ± 1.27 (20) 2.87  ± 0.35 (66, 4)*** 6.28  ± 0.63 (54, 2)* 1.61  ± 0.20 (76, 3)
% NS a 70.9 29.4 NS
IgG 9.96  ± 2.30 (26) 1.03  ± 0.16 (55, 3)
USF-G 2.51  ± 0.37 (33)*** 0.91  ± 0.13 (46, 3)
% 74.8 NS
IgG 4.23  ± 0.68 (29, 2) 6.56  ± 1.67 (26)
USF-F 4.63  ± 0.73 (53, 2) 1.47  ± 0.26 (28)**
% NS 77.6
IgG 6.48  ± 1.4 (23) 2.44  ± 0.4 (68)
c-Fos 4.66  ± 0.81 (49) 1.94  ± 0.32 (68)
% NS NS

a NS, not significant.

To confirm that the effect of USF2a/b inhibition was the result of disrupting an interaction between this transcription factor and the L4 box, we examined the effect of the antibody on the expression of luciferase in cells microinjected with the truncated plasmid pDelta L4-LPK.LucFF (see above). As observed after transfection of the analogous CAT construct into liver cells (5), the Delta L4-LPK promoter in this plasmid was unable to mediate a response to glucose (Table I). Indeed, in cells microinjected with the construct and incubated at 30 mM glucose, the ratio of firefly:Renilla luciferase activity was lower than in identically injected cells maintained at 3 mM glucose (Table I). In addition, comicroinjection with antibody USF-2 (SC) had a greatly diminished inhibitory effect (41.9%) on the activity of the L4 box-less promoter at 30 mM glucose compared with the effects of this antibody on the full-length promoter (85.1%; see Table I). Similarly, antibodies LZ and G failed to provoke any significant inhibition in Delta L4-LPK promoter activity in cells maintained at 30 mM glucose, or a small effect in cells maintained at 3 mM glucose (antibody G).


DISCUSSION

Single Cell Analysis of Transcription

The microinjection/imaging technique we have developed here provides a rapid, non-invasive and highly quantitative assay of gene expression in single living cells (26). The technology we describe extends our earlier studies (22), by allowing the easy assay of the activity of two reporter proteins in the same living cell, simply by switching between two cofactors (luciferin and coelenterazine). In this way, the activity of a regulated promoter (L-PK) can be normalized to a promoter which is constitutively active (CMV). Extremely high sensitivity is achieved due to the absence of significant background signals and the high sensitivity of the intensified imaging camera. Typically, firefly luciferase activities corresponded to 50-500 photon·cell·15 min-1 (intact L-PK promoter, 30 mM glucose) versus a background of about 20 photons (i.e. signal:noise, S:N, ratio between 2.5:1 and 25:1); Renilla luciferase activity produced 1000-10,000 photon·cell·15 min, with a background of 50-100 photons·cell·15 min-1 (S:N = 20-200:1). These S:N ratios are at least 1 order of magnitude higher than we have been able to achieve using enhanced mutants of green fluorescent protein (22, 26, 27).

Molecular Basis of the Regulation of the L-PK Gene by Glucose in beta -Cells

Previous studies have established that an intact L4 box is crucial for the induction of the L-PK gene in the beta -cell type (6) as well as in liver cells (5, 28). Whereas a role for USF proteins, interacting with this site, is implicated in liver cells (29), no data has been available up to now on the role of this family in regulating expression in islet beta -cells. Here we provide evidence that USF2, probably as a heterodimer with USF1, is responsible for the activation by glucose of L-PK gene transcription in beta -cells. Thus, in preliminary experiments, an antibody to the N terminus of USF2a/b inhibited L-PK promoter activity in primary beta -cells. In INS-1 cells, antibody USF-G and two further antibodies against the leucine zipper motif (LZ2, USF2-SC) each inhibited L-PK promoter activity. However, an antibody (USF-F) to the central portion of the protein was without effect. Although the reason for this difference is unclear, it might be speculated that the three inhibitory antibodies, but not USF-F, are able to: (i) disrupt the interaction of USF2 with the L4 box; (ii) to prevent the transactivation function of the factor; or (iii) to block an interaction with an ancillary activating protein. Of these, it might be noted that option (i) would seem the least likely since the antibodies are able to supershift complexes between USF2 and L4 box-derived oligonucleotides (13).

How might glucose control the transactivational capacity of USF proteins? Since in the liver, glucose has no effect on the ability of USF2 to interact with L4-derived oligonucleotides, nor on the occupancy of the L4 site as determined by in vivo footprinting3 this suggests that a glucose-derived second messenger alters the interaction of L4-bound USF2, or USF1/USF2 dimer, with a binding protein. One possibility is that the activity of this binding protein is modulated by reversible phosphorylation. What might cause this alteration in the phosphorylation state/activity of a USF2-interacting protein? One hypothesis is that glucose acts through the pentose phosphate shunt (29) via xylulose 5-phosphate. An alternative hypothesis suggests that increases in intracellular glucose 6-phosphate are critical (30). Future studies will be required to identify the signals which lead to the activation of USF, and in particular the in vivo binding partners of USF2.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust, British Diabetic Association, The Royal Society, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, and the Institut Scientifique Roussel.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§   To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 44-117-928-9724; Fax: 44-117-928-8274; E-mail: g.a.rutter{at}bris.ac.uk.
1   The abbreviations used are: L-PK, L-pyruvate kinase; USF, upstream stimulatory factor; LZ, leucine zipper; CMV, cytomegalovirus.
2   G. A. Rutter and J. M. Tavaré, unpublished data.
3   S. Lopez and A. Kahn, unpublished data.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Professor C. B. Wollheim (University of Geneva) for the provision of INS-1 cells.


REFERENCES

  1. Vaulont, S., and Kahn, A. (1994) FASEB J. 8, 28-35 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Towle, H. C. (1995) J. Biol. Chem 270, 23235-23238 [Free Full Text]
  3. Thompson, K. S., and Towle, H. C. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 8679-8682 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Vaulont, S., Puzenat, N., Levrat, F., Cognet, M., and Kahn, A. (1989) J. Mol. Biol. 209, 205-219 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Bergot, M.-O., Diaz-Guerra, M. J., Puzenat, N., Raymondjean, M., and Kahn, A. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 1871-1877 [Abstract]
  6. Marie, S., Diaz-Guerra, M.-J., Miquerol, L., Kahn, A., and Iynedjian, P. B. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 23881-23890 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Ferré-D'Amare, A. R., Prendergast, G. C., Ziff, E. B., and Burley, S. K. (1993) Nature 363, 38-45 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Sirito, M., Walker, S., Lin, Q., Kozlowski, M. T., Klein, W. H., and Sawadogo, M. (1992) Gene Exp. 2, 231-240
  9. Sirito, M., Lin, Q., Maity, T., and Sawadogo, M. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 427-433 [Abstract]
  10. Gregor, P. D., Sawadogo, M., and Roeder, R. G. (1990) Genes. Dev. 14, 1730-1740
  11. Henrion, A. A., Martinez, A., Mattei, M. G., Kahn, A., and Raymondjean, M. (1995) Genomics 25, 36-43 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Henrion, A. A., Vaulont, S., Raymondjean, M., and Kahn, A. (1996) Mamm. Genome 7, 803-809 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Viollet, B., Lefrancois-Martinez, A.-M., Henrion, A., Kahn, A., Raymondjean, M., and Martinez, A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 1405-1415 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Lefrancois-Martinez, A.-M., Martinez, A., Antoine, B., Raymondjean, M., and Kahn, A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem 270, 2640-2643 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Cuif, M.-H., Porteu, A., Kahn, A., and Vaulont, S. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 13769-13772 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Sherf, B. A., and Wood, K. V. (1994) Promega Notes 49, 14-21
  18. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  19. Lake, S. P., Anderson, J., Chamberlain, J., Gardner, S. J., Bell, P. R. F., and James, R. F. L. (1987) Transplantation 43, 805-808 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Rutter, G. A., Burnett, P., Rizzuto, R., Brini, M., Murgia, M., Pozzan, T., Tavaré, J. M., and Denton, R. M. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 5489-5494 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Asfari, M., Janjic, D., Meda, P., Li, G., Halban, P. A., and Wollheim, C. B. (1992) Endocrinology 130, 167-178 [Abstract]
  22. Rutter, G. A., White, M. R. H., and Tavaré, J. M. (1995) Curr. Biol. 5, 890-899 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Matthews, J. C., Hori, K., and Cormier, M. J. (1977) Biochemistry 16, 85-91 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Luo, X., and Sawadogo, M. (1996) Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 1367-1375 [Abstract]
  25. Sekine, N., Cirulli, V., Regazzi, R., Brown, L. J., Gine, E., Tamarit-Rodriguez, J., Girotti, M., Marie, S., MacDonald, M. J., Wollheim, C. B., and Rutter, G. A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 4895-4902 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Rutter, G. A., White, M. R. H., and Tavaré, J. M. (1997) in Imaging Living Cells (Rizzuto, R., and Fasolato, C., eds), R. G. Landes Co., Austin TX , in press
  27. Chalfie, M., Tu, Y., Euskirchen, G., Ward, W. W., and Prasher, D. C. (1994) Science 263, 802-805 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Cognet, M., Bergot, M.-O., and Kahn, A. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 7368-7375 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Doiron, B., Cuif, M.-H., Chen, R., and Kahn, A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem 271, 5321-5324 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Foufelle, F., Gouhot, B., Pegorier, J.-P., Perdereau, D., Girard, J., and Ferré, P. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 20543-20546 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.