The First Immunoglobulin-like Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule (NCAM) Domain Is Involved in Double-reciprocal Interaction with the Second Immunoglobulin-like NCAM Domain and in Heparin Binding*

(Received for publication, June 6, 1996, and in revised form, December 26, 1996)

Vladislav V. Kiselyov Dagger , Vladimir Berezin , Thomas E. Maar , Vladislav Soroka , Klaus Edvardsen , Arne Schousboe § and Elisabeth Bock

From the Protein Laboratory, Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3C, Building 6.2, DK-2200 Copenhagen, and the § Department of Biology, Royal Danish School of Pharmacy, Universitetsparken 2, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

To study the function of the first immunoglobulin (Ig)-like domain of the neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM), it was produced as a recombinant fusion protein in a bacterial expression system and as a recombinant protein in a eukaryotic expression system of the yeast Pichia pastoris. For comparison, other NCAM domains were also produced as fusion proteins. By means of surface plasmon resonance analysis, it was shown that the first Ig-like NCAM domain binds the second Ig-like NCAM domain with a dissociation constant 5.5 ± 1.6 × 10-5 M. Furthermore, it was found that the first Ig-like domain binds heparin. It was also demonstrated that the second Ig-like NCAM domain binds heparin and that both domains bind collagen type I via heparin but not collagen type I directly.


INTRODUCTION

The neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM)1 is a cell surface glycoprotein belonging to the immunoglobulin (Ig) superfamily (1, 2). It consists of five Ig-like domains and two fibronectin type III repeats (3, 4). The structure of the first Ig-like domain (IgI) belongs to the intermediate set of Ig-like domains (5). NCAM is expressed as three major isoforms: two transmembrane isoforms NCAM-A (180 kDa) and NCAM-B (140 kDa), and a glycosylphoshatidylinositol-anchored NCAM-C (120-kDa) isoform.

NCAM is known to mediate cell-cell interactions by a Ca2+-independent homophilic binding mechanism (6-8). The mechanism of this binding is not clear. It has been reported that a sequence of 10 amino acids in the IgIII domain of chick NCAM is involved in the homophilic binding (9, 10). In another study, it was demonstrated that all five Ig-like domains of chick NCAM were involved in this binding (11). However, analysis of the structure of the IgI domain, determined by NMR spectroscopy, and the predicted structure of the IgII domain of mouse NCAM suggests that an acidic cluster of residues at the NH2-terminal of the IgI domain (aspartic acid 29, 32, 34, 58, 59, 84; glutamic acid 85) and a basic cluster of residues of the IgII domain (lysine 135, 137, 185; arginine 139, 171) may be involved in a symmetrical double-reciprocal binding (5).

NCAM also mediates cell-substratum interactions. Different types of collagen have been shown to bind NCAM (12), but a collagen binding site in NCAM has not been identified. NCAM also binds heparin/heparan sulfate (13-15) and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (15, 16). The heparin binding domain was initially localized to a 25-kDa NH2-terminal fragment of NCAM (17) and, later, mapped to a 17-amino acid long region of the IgII domain (18).

The IgI domain of NCAM has been produced as a recombinant polypeptide in a bacterial expression system (19). When used as a substratum, this construct promoted adhesion of neuronal cell bodies, modified the migration pattern of cells from cerebellar microexplants, and increased metabolism of inositol phosphates and intracellular concentrations of Ca2+ and pH, thus indicating a functional importance of this domain (19).

The limited data concerning binding properties of the IgI NCAM domain have prompted us to investigate further the role of this domain in NCAM-mediated binding interactions. We therefore produced the IgI NCAM domain as a recombinant fusion protein in a bacterial expression system and as a recombinant protein in a eukaryotic expression system of the yeast Pichia pastoris. For comparison, other NCAM domains were also produced as fusion proteins. Both the IgI and IgII domains inhibited aggregation of cerebellar neurons, whereas other Ig-like domains of NCAM did not, indicating that the IgI and IgII domains were functionally active. Using surface plasmon resonance analysis, we show that the IgI domain binds the immobilized IgII domain and, vice versa, the IgII domain binds the immobilized IgI domain. We also show that IgI and IgII domains bind heparin and, via heparin, collagen type I but not collagen type I directly.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Production of Fusion Proteins of NCAM Fragments in a Bacterial Expression System

Construction of Fusion Proteins

Six fusion proteins were produced using mouse NCAM cDNA encoding the NCAM-C 120-kDa isoform (20) kindly provided by Dr. C. Goridis (Laboratoire de Genetique et Physiologie du Development, CNRS-Universite Aix-Marseille-II, Luminy) or the NCAM-B 140-kDa isoform (21) kindly provided by Dr. W. Wille (Institut für Genetik der Universität zu Köln). The fusion proteins consisted of an NCAM fragment fused between Escherichia coli maltose-binding protein (MBP) and an NH2-terminal fragment (65 amino acids) of E. coli beta -galactosidase. The cDNA for the IgI domain was excised from NCAM-C cDNA with the PstI and HincII restriction enzymes, and the cDNA fragments for NCAM domains IgII, IgIII, IgIV (including exon VASE), IgV, and the intracellular part of NCAM-B (Ex16,17,19) were synthesized by the polymerase chain reaction. The cDNA fragments were subcloned into a pMAL-c expression vector (New England Biolabs). The template for polymerase chain reaction amplification of the cDNA for Ex16,17,19 was the NCAM-B cDNA. For the other constructs the template was the NCAM-C cDNA. An XL1-Blue strain of E. coli (Stratagene) was used for the transformation with the recombinant and control pMAL-c plasmids. The recombinant clones were identified by small scale expression of the fusion proteins. Production of a fusion protein containing NCAM fibronectin type III domains I and II has been described previously (22). The fusion proteins were designated Ign-MBP (Ig-like domain number n produced in E. coli as a fusion protein with MBP as a fusion partner); Ex16,17,19-MBP (polypeptide encoded by NCAM exons 16, 17, and 19 produced in E. coli as a fusion protein with MBP as a fusion partner); and F3I,II-MBP (fibronectin type III domains I and II produced in E. coli as a fusion protein with MBP as a fusion partner). For IgI-MBP, IgII-MBP, and IgIII-MBP, the recombinant pMAL-c plasmids were sequenced. IgII-MBP E. coli did not contain the beta -galactosidase fragment because insertion of the IgII cDNA into the pMAL-c plasmid resulted in a shift of the reading frame terminating the beta -galactosidase after seven amino acids.

Expression and Purification of the Fusion Proteins

E. coli cells propagating the recombinant and control pMAL-c plasmids were grown in Terrific Broth (Sigma) containing 50 µg/ml ampicillin at 37 °C. Cells were induced for 2 h with 1 mM isopropyl-beta -D-thiogalactopyranoside and thereafter harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in 10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, 30 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA. Cells were subsequently frozen at -20 °C and thawed at room temperature. The sample was sonicated intermittently for 2 min on ice and centrifuged at 27,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was saved for purification of the fusion protein.

An amylose resin column (New England Biolabs) was equilibrated with column buffer 1 (10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, 0.5 M NaCl, 2 mM EDTA). The supernatant was diluted to 2-3 mg/ml total protein with column buffer 1 and loaded onto the column. The column was first washed with column buffer 1 until A280 was less than 0.03 and then with 3 column volumes of column buffer 2 (10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl). Finally, the fusion protein was eluted with column buffer 2 containing 10 mM maltose. The eluted protein was concentrated to 5-10 mg/ml and stored frozen at -20 °C. The yield was 30-100 mg of purified protein/liter of bacterial culture.

Production of the IgI NCAM Domain in the P. pastoris Yeast Expression System

Construction of the Recombinant Protein

The IgI domain of NCAM was also produced as a recombinant protein (without MBP as a fusion partner) in P. pastoris. The cDNA fragment was synthesized by polymerase chain reaction. The amplified cDNA was subcloned into an XboI/BamHI site of the pHIL-S1 plasmid (Invitrogen Corporation, San Diego). An E. coli strain Top 10 F' (Invitrogen) was used for transformation, and the recombinant clones were identified by restriction analysis of the plasmid DNA. The recombinant plasmid was linearized with NsiI and used for transfection of a P. pastoris strain His 4 GS-115 (Invitrogen). Transfection and selection were performed according to a Pichia expression kit manual supplied by the manufacturer. The recombinant protein was designated as IgI P. pastoris (Ig-like domain I produced in P. pastoris). The authenticity of IgI P. pastoris was secured by amino acid sequencing and mass spectroscopy confirming the expected molecular mass of 11 kDa.

Expression and Purification of the Secreted Protein

Cells were grown in 50 ml of medium A (13.4 g of yeast nitrogen base without amino acids (Difco, Detroit), 2 ml of 0.02% biotin, 20 g of glycerol, 40 mg of tryptophan, 50 mg of glutamic acid, 50 mg of methionine, 50 mg of lysine, 50 mg of leucine, 50 mg of isoleucine/liter of 100 mM potassium phosphate, pH 6.0) at 30 °C until saturation (A600 approx  5.0). 10 ml of the saturated culture was transferred into 300 ml of medium A and incubated for 24 h at 30 °C. Cells were then centrifuged at 2,000 × g for 10 min at 20 °C and resuspended in 50 ml of medium B (the same as medium A except that 20 g of 100% methanol was used instead of 20 g of glycerol). After incubation for 24 h at 30 °C, cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 3,000 × g for 20 min at 20 °C, and the supernatant was filtered through a 0.22-µm filter and concentrated to 2-3 mg of total protein/ml. The IgI P. pastoris was purified by gel filtration using a Sephadex G-50 column (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.) and stored frozen at -20 °C. The yield was 40-50 mg of purified protein/liter of cell culture.

Production of Antibodies

Polyclonal rabbit antibodies were raised against IgI-MBP. Rabbits were immunized as described (23).

Immunoblotting

Proteins, separated on 7.5% (w/v) polyacrylamide gels (24), were electroblotted onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA). Nonspecific binding was blocked by incubation with 2% Tween 20 in washing buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 10.2, 450 mM NaCl, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). After washing, the membrane was incubated overnight on a shaking platform with either a rabbit antiserum against IgI-MBP diluted 1:200 or with polyclonal rabbit antibodies against rat NCAM (25) diluted 1:2,000. Alkaline phosphatase-conjugated swine anti-rabbit Igs (Dakopatts, Denmark) were used as secondary antibodies in a dilution of 1:2,000. After washing, the membrane was incubated in a staining buffer consisting of 0.1 M ethanolamine HCl, pH 9.6, 0.1 mM nitroblue tetrazolium, 0.15 mM 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate, 2 mM MgCl2, 1% methanol, 0.5% acetone.

Assay for Aggregation of Cerebellar Neurons

Mixed primary microwell cultures of dissociated mouse cerebellum were prepared as described previously (26). Briefly, a suspension of dissociated cells from cerebella of 6-day-old mice was plated onto an uncoated 60-well microtiter plate (Nunc, Denmark) at a density of 45,000 cells/well in a volume of 10 µl. Cells were grown for 24 h in a culture medium consisting of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 19 mM KCl, 25 mM glucose, 0.2 mM glutamine, 0.1 international unit/liter insulin, 0.15 mM p-aminobenzoate, 100 international units/ml penicillin, and 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum. Various protein constructs were added to the culture medium before plating at the indicated concentrations. The number of aggregates, defined as clusters of more than 50 cells, was determined after 24 h of incubation.

Surface Plasmon Resonance Analysis

Real time biomolecular interaction analysis was performed using a BIAlite instrument (Pharmacia Biosensor AB, Sweden). All of the experiments were performed at 25 °C using Hepes-buffered saline (10 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 3.4 mM EDTA, 0.005% v/v Surfactant P20 (Pharmacia Biosensor)) as a running buffer. The flow rate was, unless otherwise specified, 5 µl/min.

Immobilization of Collagen Type I

Collagen type I, purified from rat tails (27), was immobilized on a sensor chip CM5 (Pharmacia Biosensor) using the following procedure. The chip was activated by 10 µl of 0.05 M N-hydroxysuccinimide, 0.2 M N-ethyl-N'-(dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide. Collagen type I was immobilized using 15 µl of 40 µg/ml collagen type I in 10 mM sodium acetate buffer, pH 5.5. Finally the chip was blocked by 15 µl of 1 M ethanolamine HCl, pH 8.5.

Binding of Fusion Proteins of NCAM Fragments to Collagen-Heparin Complex

Heparin was bound to collagen type I immobilized on a CM5 sensor chip using 50 µl of 10 mg/ml heparin from porcine intestinal mucosa (Sigma) dissolved in MilliQ water. Subsequently, 65 µl of a fusion protein at 100 µg/ml concentration was applied. In a competition experiment, IgI-MBP or IgII-MBP at 100 µg/ml concentration was preincubated with 100 µg/ml heparin for 15 min. The chip was regenerated by four 5-µl pulses of 50 mM NaOH.

Binding of IgI P. pastoris and Fusion Proteins of NCAM Fragments to Heparin

Heparin was biotinylated by mixing 1 mg of heparin/ml with 0.75 mM biotinamidocaproate N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (Sigma), 0.1 M sodium borate buffer, pH 8.8, for 1 h at room temperature. Biotinylated heparin was separated from the free biotinylation reagent by gel filtration using a Sephadex G-25 M column (Pharmacia). Heparin was immobilized injecting 25 µl of 10 µg/ml biotinylated heparin into an SA5 sensor chip (Pharmacia Biosensor) with preimmobilized streptavidin. Subsequently, 60 µl of IgI P. pastoris at a flow rate of 30 µl/min or 70 µl of a fusion protein at a flow rate of 5 µl/min was applied using the indicated concentrations. In a competition experiment, IgI-MBP or IgII-MBP at a 100 µg/ml concentration was preincubated with either 500 µg/ml heparin or polysialic acid (PSA) (Sigma) for 15 min, and IgI P. pastoris at a concentration of 100 µg/ml was preincubated with 200 µg/ml heparin for 5 min. Finally the chip was regenerated by three 5-µl pulses of 50 mM NaOH.

Binding of Various Fusion Proteins of NCAM Domains to IgI-MBP or IgII-MBP

IgI-MBP and IgII-MBP were biotinylated by mixing 1 mg of fusion protein/ml with 0.05 mM biotinamidocaproate N-hydroxysuccinimide ester in Hepes-buffered saline for 1 h at 4 °C. The biotinylated fusion protein was separated from the free biotinylation reagent by gel filtration using a Sephadex G-25 M column. The biotinylated IgI-MBP or IgII-MBP was immobilized injecting 100 µl of 10 µg/ml biotinylated fusion protein into an SA5 sensor chip at a flow rate of 2 µl/min. Subsequently, different fusion proteins of NCAM fragments in Hepes-buffered saline containing 2.2 mM maltose were injected into a sensor chip with either immobilized IgI-MBP (70 µl injection) or IgII-MBP (50 µl injection) at the indicated concentrations. Finally, the chip was regenerated by three 5-µl pulses of 5 mM NaOH.

Data were analyzed by nonlinear curve fitting using the BIAevaluation Software Set (Pharmacia Biosensor). The dissociation rate constant (kd) was calculated by fitting dissociation data to Equation 1, using kd as a floating parameter
R(t)=R<SUB>0</SUB>e<SUP><UP>−</UP>k<SUB>d</SUB>(t<UP> − </UP>t<SUB>0</SUB>)</SUP> (Eq. 1)
where R is response, t is time, R0 is the response at the start of dissociation, and t0 is the start time for the dissociation. The association rate constant (ka) was calculated by fitting data to Equation 2, using ka and Req (steady-state response level) as floating parameters
R(t)=R<SUB><UP>eq</UP></SUB> (1−e<SUP><UP>−</UP>(k<SUB>a</SUB>C<UP> + </UP>k<SUB>d</SUB>)(t<UP> − </UP>t<SUB>0</SUB></SUP>) (Eq. 2)
where C is concentration of the binding protein and t0 is the start time for the association. The initial binding rate (r0) was calculated by fitting data to Equation 3, using r0 and ks as floating parameters
R(t)=<FR><NU>r<SUB>0</SUB></NU><DE>k<SUB>s</SUB></DE></FR> (1<UP> − </UP>e<SUP>−k<SUB>s</SUB>(t<UP> − </UP>t<SUB>0</SUB>)</SUP>) (Eq. 3)
where ks = kaC + kd.

Estimation of the solution affinity of IgII-MBP to IgI P. pastoris was performed as described (35). Briefly, the initial binding rate (r0) of soluble IgII-MBP to immobilized IgI-MBP was determined at 1.79, 3.57, 5.36, 7.14, and 8.93 µM concentrations of IgII-MBP. r0 was plotted versus the concentration of IgII-MBP, fitted to a straight line, and the intercept (I) and slope (k) were estimated. Next, IgII-MBP at a 8.93 µM concentration was mixed with IgI P. pastoris at 300, 150, 75, 37.5, 18.8, 9.4, and 4.7 µM concentrations and incubated for 4 h at room temperature to reach equilibrium. r0 of the binding of unbound IgII-MBP to immobilized IgI-MBP was determined for each concentration of IgI P. pastoris. r0 was plotted versus total concentration (C) of IgI P. pastoris, and the data were fitted to Equation 4, using KD (dissociation constant in solution) and rm (initial binding rate of IgII-MBP in the absence of IgI P. pastoris) as floating parameters.
r<SUB>0</SUB>(C)=r<SUB>m</SUB><UP> − </UP><FR><NU>k</NU><DE>2</DE></FR><FENCE>C<UP> + </UP><FR><NU>r<SUB>m</SUB><UP> − </UP>I</NU><DE>k</DE></FR><UP> + </UP>K<SUB>D</SUB></FENCE><UP> + </UP> (Eq. 4)
k<RAD><RCD><FR><NU>1</NU><DE>4</DE></FR> <FENCE>C<UP> + </UP><FR><NU>r<SUB>m</SUB><UP> − </UP>I</NU><DE>k</DE></FR><UP> + </UP>K<SUB>D</SUB></FENCE><SUP>2</SUP> <UP>− </UP>C<FENCE><FR><NU>r<SUB>m</SUB><UP> − </UP>I</NU><DE>k</DE></FR></FENCE></RCD></RAD>


RESULTS

To study the function of the IgI NCAM domain, it was synthesized in a bacterial expression system of E. coli as a recombinant fusion protein (IgI-MBP) and as a recombinant domain in a eukaryotic expression system of the yeast P. pastoris (IgI P. pastoris). The fusion protein consisted of the IgI domain fused between E. coli MBP and an NH2-terminal fragment (65 amino acids) of E. coli beta -galactosidase. This expression system was chosen because it allows production of a large amount of soluble recombinant protein that can be purified by affinity chromatography using the natural affinity of MBP for maltose. The P. pastoris expression system was selected because P. pastoris is capable of protein folding and processing similar to higher eukaryotes (28), and the protein secreted into the medium can be purified easily. For comparison, we also produced other NCAM domains as fusion proteins: IgII-MBP, IgIII-MBP, IgIV-MBP, IgV-MBP, F3I,II-MBP, and Ex16,17,19-MBP. The sequences of the various recombinant NCAM constructs are given in Fig. 1.


Fig. 1. Schematic structure of mouse NCAM domains and exons and derivation of the corresponding recombinant NCAM constructs. IgI P. pastoris, residues 20-118; IgI-MBP, residues 20-110; IgII-MBP, residues 115-209; IgIII-MBP, residues 215-307; IgIV-MBP, residues 309-405 (including exon VASE (ASWTRPEKQE) between residues 354 and 355); IgV-MBP, residues 411-497; F3I,II-MBP, residues 485-692; Ex16,17,19-MBP, residues 730-809, 1077-1115. The numbering of amino acid residues is according to GenBank/EMBL under Accession No. A44290[GenBank]. Number 1 refers to the first amino acid of the secretion signal.
[View Larger Version of this Image (19K GIF file)]


The recombinant NCAM constructs were purified and analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis under reducing conditions as shown in Fig. 2, a and b. The purified proteins appeared to be more than 95% pure. The expected molecular masses for the constructed proteins were: MBP, ~52 kDa; IgII-MBP, ~56 kDa; IgI-MBP, IgIII-MBP, IgIV-MBP, and IgV-MBP, ~61-63 kDa; Ex16,17,19-MBP, ~64 kDa, and IgI P. pastoris, ~11 kDa. Only very small differences were observed between the calculated and the actual molecular masses probably because of aberrant electrophoretic migration. Characterization of F3I,II-MBP has been described previously (22).


Fig. 2. Electrophoretic analysis of the purified NCAM constructs and immunoblotting analysis of the antibodies raised against the IgI-MBP. Panel a, 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of fusion proteins. Lane 1, IgV-MBP; lane 2, IgIV-MBP; lane 3 IgIII-MBP; lane 4, IgII-MBP; lane 5 IgI-MBP; lane 6, MBP; lane 7, Ex16,17,19-MBP. After electrophoresis the gel was stained with Coomassie Blue. Panel b, 20% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of IgI P. pastoris; the gel was stained with Coomassie Blue. Panel c, immunoblotting of rat brain NCAM using the following antibodies: lane 1, rabbit antibodies against IgI-MBP from the tenth bleeding, the electrophoresis was conducted under reducing conditions; lane 2, antibodies from the same rabbit as in lane 1 but from the first bleeding, using reducing conditions; lane 3, the same antibodies as in lane 2, but under nonreducing conditions; lane 4, rabbit polyclonal antibodies against rat NCAM, using nonreducing conditions. ME stands for beta -mercaptoethanol.
[View Larger Version of this Image (24K GIF file)]


Polyclonal rabbit antibodies were raised against IgI-MBP. The antibodies of the first bleeding recognized NCAM from rat brain under nonreducing conditions but not NCAM treated with beta -mercaptoethanol (Fig. 2c). The antibodies of the following bleedings recognized both nonreduced and reduced NCAM. This means that the antibodies of the first bleeding reacted with epitopes sensitive to reduction of the disulfide bond, indicating that they probably are conformational epitopes and that IgI-MBP employed for immunization was folded correctly.

Since NCAM mediates cell-cell interactions by a Ca2+-independent homophilic binding mechanism (6-8) and also cell-substratum interactions (12, 14, 16), we investigated a possible role of the IgI NCAM domain in these binding interactions.

The IgI and IgII NCAM Domains Inhibit Aggregation of Mouse Cerebellar Neurons

To test whether IgI-MBP and IgI P. pastoris were functionally active, the effects of the various NCAM domains on neuronal cell aggregation were tested. Since immobilized IgI and IgII domains have been demonstrated to be most efficient (compared with other Ig-like NCAM domains) for adhesion of neuronal cell bodies (19), soluble IgI-MBP or IgI P. pastoris and IgII-MBP were expected to interfere with neuronal aggregation. Dissociated cells from cerebella of 6-day-old mice were plated on a microtiter plate and grown in the presence of various protein constructs; the number of cell aggregates was measured after 24 h of incubation. In the absence of any addition to the culture medium, cells initially spread evenly over the surface of the well, but after 24 h, large aggregates were formed. From Fig. 3a it appears that addition of IgI-MBP, IgII-MBP, and IgI P. pastoris inhibited the formation of aggregates and therefore led to a decrease in the size of aggregates and, as a result, to an increase in the number of smaller aggregates. IgIII-MBP and IgV-MBP did not have any effect when compared with MBP or phosphate-buffered saline, and IgIV-MBP had only a slight effect. To test whether MBP affects biological activity of the IgI domain in the IgI-MBP construct, a dose response of MBP, IgI-MBP, and IgI P. pastoris was studied. As appears from Fig. 3b, IgI-MBP and IgI P. pastoris had essentially the same dose-response curves, MBP alone had no effect at any of the tested doses, indicating that MBP does not affect biological activity of the IgI domain in the IgI-MBP construct. Thus, IgI-MBP, IgI P. pastoris, and IgII-MBP NCAM domains inhibited aggregation of mouse cerebellar neurons, indicating that these protein constructs were functionally active and therefore suited for the subsequent binding assays.


Fig. 3. Effect of the Ig-like NCAM domains on mixed primary cell cultures of mouse cerebellar neurons. Panel a, IgI-MBP, IgI P. pastoris, IgII-MBP, IgIII-MBP, IgIV-MBP, IgV-MBP, and MBP were added to the culture medium before plating at a concentration of 0.2 µM (10 µg/ml for fusion proteins and 2 µg/ml for IgI P. pastoris). Panel b, MBP, IgI-MBP, and IgI P. pastoris were added at 0.008, 0.04, 0.2, and 1 µM concentrations. The number of cell aggregates was measured after 24 h. Three independent experiments, each in 10 replicates, were performed. The data from different experiments were pooled. The results are shown as mean ± S.E.
[View Larger Version of this Image (21K GIF file)]


The IgI Domain of NCAM Binds to Heparin

To test the possibility that the IgI NCAM domain is involved in NCAM-mediated heterophilic interactions, we used surface plasmon resonance analysis for studying the possible binding of this domain to some putative NCAM ligands. No binding was found to laminin, collagen type I, and fibronectin (not shown), whereas an affinity was found for heparin (Fig. 4a). To estimate the dissociation and association rate constants, we used the highest practically reasonable flow rate of 30 µl/min to overcome possible mass transport limitation. The apparent constant of dissociation for IgI P. pastoris and the apparent association and dissociation rate constants, in the context of the model used (see "Experimental Procedures"), were 9.0 ± 2.0 × 10-7 M, 1.1 ± 0.3 × 104 M-1 s-1, and 8.4 ± 0.4 × 10-3 s-1, respectively. The goodness of fit between the fitted curves and the experimental data was assessed by means of the chi 2 value defined as
&khgr;<SUP>2</SUP>=<FR><NU><LIM><OP>∑</OP><LL>i=1</LL><UL>n</UL></LIM> (R<SUB>i</SUB><SUP>f</SUP><UP> − </UP>R<SUB>i</SUB><SUP>x</SUP>)<SUP>2</SUP></NU><DE>n<UP> − </UP>p</DE></FR> (Eq. 5)
where Rif and Rix are the fitted and the experimental values, respectively; n and p are the number of data points and degrees of freedom, respectively. The chi 2 value was typically less than 1, indicating that the experimental data were described adequately by the equations of pseudo-first order kinetics (see "Experimental Procedures"). In a competition experiment, IgI P. pastoris was preincubated with soluble heparin for 5 min. This completely inhibited subsequent binding of IgI P. pastoris to immobilized heparin (Fig. 4a).


Fig. 4. Binding of IgI P. pastoris, IgI-MBP, and IgII-MBP to heparin or the collagen-heparin complex. Panel a, binding of IgI P. pastoris to immobilized heparin. The concentration of IgI P. pastoris (from top curve to bottom) was 10, 5, 3.5, 2, 1, and 0.5 µM, and 10 µM + 200 µg/ml heparin. The IgI P. pastoris domain was tested for unspecific binding to a blank sensor chip and to a sensor chip with immobilized streptavidin at a concentration of 10 µM. No unspecific binding was detected. In a competition experiment, the IgI P. pastoris at a 10 µM concentration was preincubated with 200 µg/ml heparin for 5 min. Two independent experiments were performed, and data from one of these experiments are presented. Panel b, binding of IgI-MBP and IgII-MBP to immobilized heparin. MBP and Ex16,17,19-MBP were used as controls. The concentration of each protein was 100 µg/ml. In a competition experiment, IgI-MBP or IgII-MBP at 100 µg/ml was preincubated with 500 µg/ml heparin for 15 min. The fusion proteins were tested for unspecific binding to a blank sensor chip and to a sensor chip with immobilized streptavidin. Only very low unspecific binding was detected. Three independent experiments were performed. The data from one representative experiment are shown. Panel c, binding of IgI-MBP and IgII-MBP to the collagen-heparin complex. MBP and Ex16,17,19-MBP were used as controls. The concentration of each protein was 100 µg/ml. In a competition experiment, IgI-MBP or IgII-MBP at 100 µg/ml was preincubated with 100 µg/ml heparin for 15 min. Three independent experiments were performed. The data from one representative experiment are shown.
[View Larger Version of this Image (18K GIF file)]


To compare the heparin binding of the IgI domain to the well documented heparin binding of the IgII domain (18), we used IgI-MBP and IgII-MBP and five control proteins: MBP alone, Ex16,17,19-MBP, IgIII-MBP, IgIV-MBP, and IgV-MBP. The IgII-MBP exhibited a stronger binding to heparin than IgI-MBP; but the control proteins, MBP and Ex16,17,19-MBP, both exhibited a very low, probably unspecific, binding (Fig. 4b). The binding of IgIII-MBP, IgIV-MBP, and IgV-MBP was at the same level as that of MBP and Ex16,17,19-MBP (not shown). In a competition experiment, IgI-MBP and IgII-MBP were preincubated with either soluble heparin or a control negatively charged carbohydrate, PSA, for 15 min. Heparin completely inhibited subsequent binding of the fusion proteins to immobilized heparin (Fig. 4b), whereas PSA had no effect (not shown). We were, however, unable to show binding of soluble heparin to either immobilized IgII-MBP or IgI-MBP. This may be because the surface of a CM5 sensor chip is negatively charged at pH > 3. Since heparin molecules also are negatively charged, electrostatic repulsion between the surface of the sensor chip and heparin molecules may have precluded binding of heparin to IgI-MBP or IgII-MBP. It is also possible that the heparin binding was not detected because of the low molecular mass of heparin since the observed signal in surface plasmon resonance analysis is proportional to the molecular mass of the soluble ligand, and/or the employed immobilization procedure may have inactivated the heparin binding sites of IgII-MBP and IgI-MBP.

We also tested whether IgI-MBP and IgII-MBP were able to bind a collagen-heparin complex. This was done by immobilizing collagen type I on the sensor chip and subsequently applying heparin, which is a well known ligand of collagen (29). Although neither IgI-MBP nor IgII-MBP was able to bind to collagen type I directly, we found binding of IgI-MBP and IgII-MBP to the collagen-heparin complex (Fig. 4c). Interestingly, the maximal binding of IgII-MBP to heparin alone (Fig. 4b) was about ~5 times higher than the maximal binding of IgI-MBP, whereas the maximal binding of IgII-MBP to the collagen-heparin complex (Fig. 4c) was only 1.3 times higher than the maximal binding of IgI-MBP, indicating that IgI-MBP bound the collagen-heparin complex almost as well as IgII-MBP. This indicates that the IgI NCAM domain possibly also binds collagen type I although with a very low affinity.

In a competition experiment, IgI-MBP and IgII-MBP were preincubated with soluble heparin for 15 min. This completely inhibited subsequent binding of the fusion proteins to the collagen-heparin complex (Fig. 4c), indicating that it was heparin and not collagen type I that bound to IgI-MBP and IgII-MBP. The control proteins, MBP and Ex16,17,19-MBP, exhibited a very low, presumably unspecific binding to the sensor chip carrying the immobilized collagen-heparin complex (Fig. 4c); and the binding of IgIII-MBP, IgIV-MBP, IgV-MBP, and F3I,II-MBP was the same as that of the control proteins (not shown).

It was not possible to extract reliable kinetic data from the binding of IgI-MBP and IgII-MBP to either heparin alone or the collagen-heparin complex because of the interference of the MBP portion of IgI-MBP and IgII-MBP. MBP exhibited a low unspecific binding to heparin and the collagen-heparin complex compared with the binding of IgI-MBP and IgII-MBP (Fig. 4, b and c); however, the small amount of MBP that bound to heparin, did not dissociate. The dissociation of MBP and IgI-MBP appeared to be identical (Fig. 4b), even though IgI P. pastoris dissociated from heparin very quickly with a dissociation rate constant of approximately 10-2 s-1. We therefore believe that the dissociation rate of IgI-MBP was determined by the dissociation rate of the IgI domain and by the rate of very slow desorption of MBP. Therefore, it was not possible to calculate kinetic data reliably from the binding of fusion proteins containing MBP as a fusion partner. It should be mentioned that the maximal binding of IgI-MBP to heparin alone was approximately 900 resonance units, whereas the maximal binding of IgI-MBP to the collagen-heparin complex was only 120 resonance units. This was because in the former experiment, much more heparin was immobilized per area unit of the sensor chip than in the latter.

Thus, the IgI domain of NCAM bound heparin, although apparently with a lower affinity than the IgII NCAM domain. However, when heparin was bound to collagen type I, the IgI domain bound heparin almost as well as the IgII domain, indicating that the IgI domain possibly also recognized collagen type I although with a very low affinity.

The IgI NCAM Domain Is Directly Involved in NCAM-mediated Homophilic Binding

We finally tested the possibility that the IgI NCAM domain may be involved in NCAM-mediated homophilic binding. IgI-MBP was immobilized on the sensor chip, and the binding of fusion proteins of various NCAM domains was tested at a concentration of 1 mg/ml. From Fig. 5a, it appears that IgII-MBP bound strongly to immobilized IgI-MBP, whereas IgI-MBP, IgV-MBP, and MBP exhibited low unspecific binding. The binding of IgIII-MBP, IgIV-MBP, and F3I,II-MBP was approximately the same as that of IgI-MBP, IgV-MBP, and MBP (not shown). Since soluble IgII-MBP binds to immobilized IgI-MBP, the reverse should also be expected, namely that soluble IgI-MBP binds to immobilized IgII-MBP. Therefore, we also immobilized IgII-MBP on the sensor chip and tested it for binding of various NCAM fusion proteins at a concentration of 1 mg/ml (Fig. 5b). IgI-MBP bound to immobilized IgII-MBP more strongly than IgII-MBP, IgV-MBP, and MBP, the maximal binding being at least two times higher than that of the other proteins. The binding of IgIII-MBP, IgIV-MBP, and F3I,II-MBP was approximately the same as that of the IgII-MBP, IgV-MBP, and MBP (not shown). It is easy to see that binding of soluble IgII-MBP to immobilized IgI-MBP was higher than binding of soluble IgI-MBP to immobilized IgII-MBP (Fig. 5, a and b). Since approximately the same amount of protein was immobilized in both cases, this difference in binding may be the result of partial inactivation of IgII-MBP and, possibly to a lesser extent, of IgI-MBP during immobilization. IgII-MBP might be more predisposed to partial inactivation during immobilization compared with IgI-MBP, because the fusion proteins were immobilized via amino groups of lysine residues, and the potential binding site of IgII-MBP is a cluster of basic amino acid residues consisting of lysine 135, 137, 185, and arginine 139 and 171 (5).


Fig. 5. Binding of fusion proteins of NCAM domains to immobilized IgI-MBP (panel a) and immobilized IgII-MBP (panel b). The concentration of the fusion proteins was 1 mg/ml (17 µM). Three independent experiments were performed. The data from one representative experiments are shown.
[View Larger Version of this Image (16K GIF file)]


To determine the affinity of the IgI-IgII interaction, binding of soluble IgII-MBP to immobilized IgI-MBP was measured using various concentrations of IgII-MBP (Fig. 6a). The apparent dissociation constant and the apparent association and dissociation rate constants, in the context of the model used (see "Experimental Procedures"), were 1.3 ± 0.3 × 10-5 M, 1.4 ± 0.3 × 102 M-1 s-1, and 1.2 ± 0.1 × 10-3 s-1, respectively. The estimation of kinetic parameters from this experiment may not be reliable because of the interference of MBP. The rate of dissociation of IgII-MBP is determined by the rate of dissociation of the IgII domain and by the rate of unspecific desorption of MBP (see explanation above). This leads to underestimation of the dissociation rate constant (apparent slower dissociation) and, as a result, to overestimation of the affinity. Thus, the true value of the dissociation constant is higher than 1.3 ± 0.3 × 10-5 M.


Fig. 6. Estimation of the affinity of the IgI-IgII interaction. Panel a, binding of IgII-MBP at 35.7 µM (2 mg/ml), 17.9, 8.9, 3.6, and 1.8 µM concentrations to immobilized IgI-MBP. Panel b, binding of IgII-MBP at 8.9 µM (0.5 mg/ml) concentration to immobililized IgI-MBP in the presence of IgI P. pastoris at 4.7, 9.4, 18.8, 37.5, 75, 150, and 300 µM concentrations. IgII-MBP was preincubated with IgI P. pastoris for 4 h before measurement of the binding. Three independent experiments were performed. The data from one representative experiment are shown. Panel c, initial binding rate of IgII-MBP to immobilized IgI-MBP at various concentrations of IgII-MBP. Panel d, initial binding rate of IgII-MBP at 8.9 µM (0.5 mg/ml) concentration to immobililized IgI-MBP in the presence of IgI P. pastoris at various concentrations. Three independent experiments were performed. The results are shown as mean ± S.E. The data were fitted to the model (see "Experimental Procedures").
[View Larger Version of this Image (13K GIF file)]


To estimate the affinity of the IgI-IgII interaction more reliably, we therefore measured binding of IgII-MBP to IgI P. pastoris in solution, thus avoiding the problem of unspecific interaction of MBP with the sensor chip. IgII-MBP at an 8.93 µM (0.5 mg/ml) concentration was mixed with various concentrations of IgI P. pastoris, incubated for 4 h at room temperature to reach equilibrium, and the binding of unbound IgII-MBP to immobilized IgI-MBP was measured at each concentration of IgI P. pastoris (Fig. 6b). To determine the concentration of unbound IgII-MBP in the mixture with IgI P. pastoris, a calibration of the initial binding rate of IgII-MBP to immobilized IgI-MBP versus the concentration of IgII-MBP was performed (Fig. 6c). The initial binding rate of IgII-MBP to immobilized IgI-MBP in the mixture with IgI P. pastoris was calculated, plotted versus the concentration of IgI P. pastoris, and the data were fitted to the model (see "Experimental Procedures") (Fig. 6d), with the resulting dissociation constant of 5.5 ± 1.6 × 10-5 M. As expected, this value of dissociation constant was higher than 1.3 ± 0.3 × 10-5 M.

Since the IgIII domain of chick NCAM has been reported to bind to itself (9, 10), and the IgV, IgIV, IgII, and IgI domains of chick NCAM have been reported to bind to IgI, IgII, IgIV, and IgV, respectively (11), it was of interest to test whether the IgI, IgII, IgIII, IgIV, and IgV domains of mouse NCAM could bind to IgV, IgIV, IgIII, IgII, and IgI domains, respectively, under the chosen conditions. As shown above, soluble IgV-MBP and IgIV-MBP did not bind to immobilized IgI-MBP and IgII-MBP, respectively. When F3I,II-MBP, IgV-MBP, IgIV-MBP, and IgIII-MBP were immobilized, no specific binding of any domain was detected (not shown).


DISCUSSION

In this study we have investigated the role of the IgI NCAM domain in NCAM-mediated binding interactions. The functional activity of IgI-MBP and IgI P. pastoris was tested by studying the effects of the various NCAM domains on neuronal cell aggregation. IgI-MBP, IgI P. pastoris, and IgII-MBP inhibited aggregation of mouse cerebellar neurons, whereas other Ig-like domains of NCAM had very little, if any, effect, indicating that the IgI and IgII protein constructs were functionally active and therefore suited for the binding assays. The binding properties of the IgI NCAM domain were studied using surface plasmon resonance analysis, and it was demonstrated that IgI-MBP bound immobilized IgII-MBP, and vice versa, IgII-MBP bound immobilized IgI-MBP. It was also demonstrated that IgI P. pastoris inhibited binding of IgII-MBP to immobilized IgI-MBP. This indicates that the IgI and IgII domains are directly involved in homophilic interactions of NCAM. Our results are in agreement with Frei et al. (19), who showed that the IgI and IgII NCAM domains, synthesized in a bacterial expression system, when used as immobilized substratum, clearly promoted cell adhesion of NCAM-expressing cells, whereas other NCAM domains hardly had any adhesive effects. Our data are also in accordance with reports that a 25-kDa NH2-terminal NCAM fragment containing the IgI and IgII NCAM domains is involved in cell adhesion (14, 30). The fact that IgI-MBP, IgI P. pastoris, and IgII-MBP inhibited aggregation of mouse cerebellar neurons, whereas other Ig-like domains of NCAM had very little effect, further supports the notion that the IgI and IgII domains are involved in NCAM-mediated binding interactions. Our data are also in agreement with our recent prediction (5), based on the analysis of the three-dimensional structure of the IgI domain and the predicted three-dimensional structure of the IgII domain, that an acidic cluster of residues at the NH2 terminus of the IgI domain (aspartic acid 29, 32, 34, 58, 59, and 84, and glutamic acid 85) and a basic cluster of residues of the IgII domain (lysine 135, 137, and 185, and arginine 139 and 171) may be involved in a symmetrical double-reciprocal binding (schematically depicted in Fig. 7a).


Fig. 7. Binding interactions of the IgI NCAM domain. Panel a, mechanism of NCAM-mediated homophilic binding: the IgI NCAM domain is involved in a symmetrical double-reciprocal interaction with the IgII NCAM domain. Panel b, mechanism of NCAM-collagen interaction: both the IgI and IgII NCAM domains bind to heparin and, via heparin, to collagen; thus, heparin forms a "bridge" between NCAM and collagen.
[View Larger Version of this Image (16K GIF file)]


The estimated dissociation constant (KD) of the interaction of the individual IgI and IgII domains was 5.5 ± 1.6 × 10-5 M. A rough estimate of the dissociation constant of the double-reciprocal interaction (KDdri) can be made. Let Delta Gst be the standard Gibbs energy change of the interaction of the individual IgI and IgII domains at constant temperature and pressure. The standard Gibbs energy change of the double-reciprocal interaction, then, can be minimally estimated as approx 2Delta Gst, when the entropy loss associated with a more ordered complex is not taken into account, since the model (Fig. 7a) implies that the double-reciprocal interaction is symmetrical (5). The true value of the standard Gibbs energy change of the double-reciprocal interaction might be larger than approx 2Delta Gst because of the entropy loss. Therefore
K<SUB>D</SUB><SUP><UP>dri</UP></SUP>≥ e<SUP><FR><NU>2&Dgr;G<SUP>st</SUP></NU><DE>RT</DE></FR></SUP><UP> = </UP><FENCE>e<SUP><FR><NU>&Dgr;G<SUP><UP>st</UP></SUP></NU><DE>RT</DE></FR></SUP></FENCE><SUP>2</SUP><UP> = </UP>K<SUB>D</SUB><SUP>2</SUP> (Eq. 6)
where R is the universal gas constant, and T is the absolute temperature. Thus, the dissociation constant of the double-reciprocal interaction for mouse NCAM can be minimally estimated as 3.3 ± 1.8 × 10-9 M based on the contributions of the individual domains, which is in reasonable agreement with the experimental value for rat NCAM 6.9 × 10-8 M (8).

The homophilic binding site for the chick transmembrane NCAM-B isoform has been mapped to a decapeptide sequence from Lys-243 to Glu-252 in the IgIII domain (9, 10), and the counterreceptor for the IgIII domain has been localized to the same decapeptide sequence (31). Recently, it has been demonstrated, in aggregation experiments with fluorescent microspheres, that the IgI, IgII, IgIII, IgIV, and IgV domains of chick NCAM interact with the IgV, IgIV, IgIII, IgII, and IgI domains, respectively (11). Our data indicate that there is possibly more than one mechanism of NCAM homophilic binding. However, in our experiments, no binding of the IgI, IgII, IgIII, IgIV, and IgV domains of mouse NCAM to the IgV, IgIV, IgIII, IgII, and IgI domains, respectively, using surface plasmon resonance analysis could be shown. The absence of binding may be the result of several factors: inactivation of the proteins during immobilization, purification, or storage; a very low affinity of the interaction; incorrect folding since the proteins were produced in bacteria and therefore not glycosylated. However, if five pairs of NCAM domains are involved in the homophilic binding at the same time (IgI binds to IgV, IgII to IgIV, IgIII to IgIII, IgIV to IgII, and IgV to IgI), and if the dissociation constants of the IgI-IgV, IgII-IgIV, and IgIII-IgIII interactions are approximately the same, then the KD of the interaction of the individual domains is approximately the fifth root of the KD of the homophilic binding of NCAM. Presuming that the KD of the homophilic binding is as low as 10-10 M (100-1,000 times lower than the experimental value given in Ref. 8), then the KD of the interaction of the individual domains is approx 10-2 M, which cannot be detected by surface plasmon resonance analysis. Although we cannot demonstrate that IgIII-MBP, IgIV-MBP, and IgV-MBP were folded correctly, we have several indications that that was the case for IgI-MBP and IgII-MBP. (i) Polyclonal antibodies of the first bleeding against IgI-MBP did not recognize a reduced NCAM preparation, whereas a nonreduced preparation was readily recognized, indicating that the conformation of the IgI domain in IgI-MBP was close to the conformation of the nonreduced form of NCAM, and therefore that the disulfide bridge, which is an essential feature of an Ig-like domain, was formed. (ii) Both IgI-MBP and IgII-MBP inhibited aggregation of mouse cerebellar neurons, indicating that these protein constructs were functionally active. (iii) In contrast to the IgIII domain, the IgI and IgII domains are not glycosylated in native NCAM, and therefore, glycosylation is not required for proper folding. (iv) The binding of IgI-MBP and IgII-MBP to heparin, and of IgI-MBP to IgII-MBP, indicates that these protein constructs were folded in an active conformation.

Since the affinity of NCAM homophilic binding increases during development (8), probably because of a decrease in NCAM polysialylation (32, 33), it has been hypothesized that the homophilic binding mechanism is developmentally regulated by the PSA content of NCAM. Because PSA is attached to the IgV NCAM domain (34), the binding mechanism indicated by the model in Fig. 7a may be favored in a situation with a high PSA content, whereas NCAM molecules with a low amount of PSA may be able to slide along each other, favoring the mechanism in which all five Ig-like domains are involved: IgI binds to IgV, IgII to IgIV, IgIII to IgIII, IgIV to IgII, and IgV to IgI (11).

IgI P. pastoris was found to bind heparin with a constant of dissociation of 9.0 ± 2.0 × 10-7 M and association and dissociation rate constants of 1.1 ± 0.3 × 104 M-1 s-1 and 8.4 ± 0.4 × 10-3 s-1, respectively. No binding could be demonstrated to laminin, collagen type I, or fibronectin. Comparison of the heparin binding of IgI-MBP and IgII-MBP revealed that the IgII domain bound heparin with a higher affinity than the IgI domain. Heparin binding of the IgI domain may be considered specific on the following criteria. (i) The IgI domain bound heparin but did not bind other negatively charged carbohydrates such as carboxymethylated dextran (the surface of a CM5 sensor chip) and PSA. (ii) Other extracellular domains of NCAM (with the exception of the IgII domain) did not bind to heparin. In contrast to the IgII domain, where a cluster of basic amino acids capable of heparin binding has been identified, there is no cluster of basic amino acids in the IgI domain. It is possible that such a cluster may not be required for low affinity heparin-binding proteins.

It has been demonstrated previously that NCAM binds different types of collagen (12) and that binding of NCAM to collagens type I and V could be inhibited by glycosaminoglycans such as heparin and chondroitin sulfate (14). However, the authors were unable to determine whether the inhibition by glycosaminoglycans was the result of their binding to collagen or to NCAM. Therefore, it is not clear whether NCAM actually can bind collagen directly or via glycosaminoglycans. Neither IgI-MBP nor IgII-MBP bound to collagen type I directly. However, we demonstrated binding of IgI-MBP and IgII-MBP to collagen type I to which heparin was associated. In a competition experiment, heparin inhibited binding of IgI-MBP and IgII-MBP to the collagen-heparin complex, indicating that it was heparin and not collagen type I that bound IgI-MBP and IgII-MBP. Other NCAM domains did not bind to the collagen-heparin complex. The maximal binding of IgII-MBP to heparin alone was approximately 5 times higher than the maximal binding of IgI-MBP, whereas the maximal binding of IgII-MBP to the collagen-heparin complex was only 1.3 times higher than the maximal binding of IgI-MBP, indicating that IgI-MBP bound the collagen-heparin complex almost as well as IgII-MBP. This indicates that the IgI NCAM domain possibly also binds collagen type I although with a very low affinity.

Based on our data, we conclude that heparin can form a "bridge" between collagen type I and NCAM (Fig. 7b). In this model, both the IgI and IgII NCAM domains bind to heparin associated with collagen.

Thus, we present evidence that in mouse the IgI and IgII NCAM domains are directly involved in NCAM-mediated homophilic interaction. Both NCAM domains also bind heparin and, via heparin, collagen type I but probably not collagen type I directly.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by the EU Program on in Vitro Developmental Toxicology Contract BIO2-CT-93-0471, the EU Program on Neuronal Development and Regeneration Contract BIO2-CT-93-0260, the Danish Medical Research Council, the Danish Biotechnology Program, the Danish Cancer Society, and the Lundbeck Foundation.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    To whom correspondence should be addressed.
1   The abbreviations used are: NCAM, neural cell adhesion molecule; Ig, immunoglobulin; MBP, maltose-binding protein; PSA, polysialic acid.

REFERENCES

  1. Krog, L., and Bock, E. (1992) APMIS Suppl. 27, 53-70 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Gegelashvili, G., and Bock, E. (1996) Treatise on Biomembranes 3, 33-75
  3. Cunningham, B. A., Hemperly, J. J., Murray, B. A., Prediger, E. A., Brackenbury, R., and Edelman, G. M. (1987) Science 236, 799-806 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Small, S. J., Shull, G. E., Santoni, M.-J., and Akeson, R. (1987) J. Cell Biol. 105, 2335-2345 [Abstract]
  5. Thomsen, N. K., Soroka, V., Jensen, P. H., Berezin, V., Kiselyov, V. V., Bock, E., and Poulsen, F. M. (1996) Nature Struct. Biol. 3, 581-584 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Rutishauser, U., Hoffman, S., and Edelman, G. M. (1982) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 79, 685-689 [Abstract]
  7. Hoffman, S., and Edelman, G. M. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 80, 5762-5766 [Abstract]
  8. Moran, N., and Bock, E. (1988) FEBS Lett. 242, 121-124 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Rao, Y., Wu, X.-F., Gariepy, J., Rutishauser, U., and Siu, C.-H. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 118, 937-949 [Abstract]
  10. Rao, Y., Wu, X.-F., Yip, P., Gariepy, J., and Siu, C.-H. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 20630-20638 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Ranheim, T. S., Edelman, G. M., and Cunningham, B. A. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 4071-4075 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Probstmeier, R., Kühn, K., and Schachner, M. (1989) J. Neurochem. 53, 1794-1801 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Cole, G. J., Schubert, D., and Glaser, L. (1985) J. Cell Biol. 100, 1192-1199 [Abstract]
  14. Cole, G. J., and Glaser, L. (1986) J. Cell Biol. 102, 403-412 [Abstract]
  15. Nybroe, O., Moran, N., and Bock, E. (1989) J. Neurochem. 52, 1947-1949 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Grumet, M., Flaccus, A., and Margolis, R. U. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 120, 815-824 [Abstract]
  17. Cole, G. J., Loewy, A., Cross, N. V., Akeson, R., and Glaser, L. (1986) J. Cell Biol. 103, 1739-1744 [Abstract]
  18. Cole, G. J., and Akeson, R. (1989) Neuron 2, 1157-1165 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Frei, T., von Bohlen und Halbach, F., Wille, W., and Schachner, M. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 118, 177-194 [Abstract]
  20. Barthels, D., Santoni, M. J., Wille, W., Ruppert, C., Chaix, J. C., Hirsch, M. R., Fontecilla-Camps, J. C., and Goridis, C. (1987) EMBO J. 6, 907-914 [Abstract]
  21. Santoni, M. J., Barthels, D., Barbas, J. A., Hirsch, M. R., Steinmetz, M., Goridis, C., and Wille, W. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 8621-8641 [Abstract]
  22. Kasper, C., Stahlhut, M., Berezin, V., Maar, T. E., Edvardsen, K., Kiselyov, V. V., Soroka, V., and Bock, E. (1996) J. Neurosci. Res. 46, 173-186 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Harboe, N., and Ingild, A. (1973) Scand. J. Immunol. Suppl. 2, 161-164
  24. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Rasmussen, S., Ramlau, J., Axelsen, N. H., and Bock, E. (1982) Scand. J. Immunol. 15, 179-185 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Trenkner, E., and Sidman, R. L. (1977) J. Cell Biol. 75, 915-940 [Abstract]
  27. Piez, K.-A. (1967) in Treatise on Collagen (Ramachandran, G. N., ed), Vol. 1, pp. 207-252, Academic Press, London
  28. Buckholz, R. G., and Gleeson, M. A. G. (1991) Bio/Technology 9, 1067-1072 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Lindahl, U., and Höök, M. (1978) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 47, 385-417 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Frelinger, A. L., III, and Rutishauser, U. (1986) J. Cell Biol. 103, 1729-1737 [Abstract]
  31. Rao, Y., Zhao, X., and Siu, C.-H. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 27540-27548 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Sadoul, R., Hirn, M., Deagostini-Bazin, H., Rougon, G., and Goridis, C. (1983) Nature 304, 347-349 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Rutishauser, U., Watanabe, M., Silver, J., Troy, F. A., and Vimr, E. R. (1985) J. Cell Biol. 101, 1842-1849 [Abstract]
  34. Nelson, R. W., Bates, P. A., and Rutishauser, U. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 17171-17179 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Karlsson, R. (1994) Anal. Biochem. 221, 142-151 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.