Human Tyrosyl-tRNA Synthetase Shares Amino Acid Sequence Homology with a Putative Cytokine*

(Received for publication, January 10, 1997, and in revised form, March 26, 1997)

Theresa A. Kleeman Dagger , Dongbing Wei Dagger , Keith L. Simpson and Eric A. First §

From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Louisiana State University Medical Center, Shreveport, Louisiana 71130-3932

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

To test the hypothesis that tRNATyr recognition differs between bacterial and human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases, we sequenced several clones identified as human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase cDNAs by the Human Genome Project. We found that human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase is composed of three domains: 1) an amino-terminal Rossmann fold domain that is responsible for formation of the activated E·Tyr-AMP intermediate and is conserved among bacteria, archeae, and eukaryotes; 2) a tRNA anticodon recognition domain that has not been conserved between bacteria and eukaryotes; and 3) a carboxyl-terminal domain that is unique to the human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase and whose primary structure is 49% identical to the putative human cytokine endothelial monocyte-activating protein II, 50% identical to the carboxyl-terminal domain of methionyl-tRNA synthetase from Caenorhabditis elegans, and 43% identical to the carboxyl-terminal domain of Arc1p from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The first two domains of the human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase are 52, 36, and 16% identical to tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases from S. cerevisiae, Methanococcus jannaschii, and Bacillus stearothermophilus, respectively. Nine of fifteen amino acids known to be involved in the formation of the tyrosyl-adenylate complex in B. stearothermophilus are conserved across all of the organisms, whereas amino acids involved in the recognition of tRNATyr are not conserved. Kinetic analyses of recombinant human and B. stearothermophilus tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases expressed in Escherichia coli indicate that human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase aminoacylates human but not B. stearothermophilus tRNATyr, and vice versa, supporting the original hypothesis. It is proposed that like endothelial monocyte-activating protein II and the carboxyl-terminal domain of Arc1p, the carboxyl-terminal domain of human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase evolved from gene duplication of the carboxyl-terminal domain of methionyl-tRNA synthetase and may direct tRNA to the active site of the enzyme.


INTRODUCTION

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze the aminoacylation of tRNA by their cognate amino acid. For most aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (E), tRNA aminoacylation can be separated into two steps: formation of a stable enzyme-bound aminoacyladenylate intermediate (E·AA-AMP, Equation 1), followed by transfer of the amino acid (AA) from the aminoacyl-adenylate intermediate to the 3' end of the tRNA substrate (Equation 2).
E+<UP>AA</UP>+<UP>ATP</UP> ⇄ E · <UP>AA-AMP</UP>+<UP>PP<SUB>i</SUB></UP> (Eq. 1)
E · <UP>AA-AMP</UP>+<UP>tRNA</UP> ⇄ E+<UP>AA-tRNA</UP>+<UP>AMP</UP> (Eq. 2)
The 20 different aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases fall into two distinct structural classes (1, 2). Class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (of which tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase is a member) are characterized by a structurally well conserved amino-terminal Rossmann fold domain which contains the signature sequences "HIGH" and "KMSKS" (3, 4). In contrast, the carboxyl-terminal domains of class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are structurally diverse suggesting that the primordial aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase consisted solely of the amino-terminal Rossmann fold (5-8). Both x-ray crystallography and site-directed mutagenesis of class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases indicate that the amino-terminal domains are responsible for catalyzing the first step of the aminoacylation reaction and recognizing the 3' end of the tRNA substrate, whereas the carboxyl-terminal domain is responsible for recognition of the anticodon loop of the tRNA substrate (6, 7, 9-15).

Transfer RNA molecules also occur as one of two distinct types, although there does not appear to be a correlation between the two types of tRNA molecules and the two classes of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase. Tyrosyl-tRNA (tRNATyr) is unique among tRNAs in that in bacteria it is type II (which contains an extended variable loop), whereas in eukaryotes it is type I (16, 17). Furthermore, previous studies indicate that bacterial and eukaryotic tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases do not catalyze the aminoacylation of other tRNATyr substrates suggesting that tRNATyr recognition differs between bacteria and eukaryotes (17-21). If this hypothesis is correct, it should be possible to exploit this species specificity to design novel antibiotics that selectively inhibit bacterial tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases. To test this hypothesis, we have sequenced the cDNA for human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase and expressed the recombinant protein in Escherichia coli cells. During the course of these investigations, it was discovered that the human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase consists of three distinct domains, an amino-terminal Rossmann fold domain, an anticodon recognition domain, and an idiosyncratic carboxyl-terminal domain whose amino acid sequence is 49% identical to the putative human cytokine endothelial monocyte-activating protein II (EMAP II),1 50% identical to the carboxyl-terminal domain of methionyl-tRNA synthetase from Caenorhabditis elegans, and 43% identical to the Arc1p protein (also known as G4p1), which has been postulated to direct tRNA to active sites of the methionyl- and glutamyl-tRNA synthetases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (22). This is in contrast to all other known tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase sequences, which possess only the first two domains. The results of these analyses and possible implications of the findings are presented here.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

cDNA clones 53277 and 124918 (I.M.A.G.E. clone accession numbers) were obtained from the I.M.A.G.E. Consortium (23). All other cDNA clones were obtained from The Institute for Genome Research (TIGR) through the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and are designated by their TIGR clone numbers. Reagents and vectors were purchased from the following sources: pET-30a vector and S-Tag Western blot kit (Novagen), Ni-NTA resin and QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen), Wizard PCR prep system and recombinant enterokinase (Promega), NuSieve low melting point agarose (FMC), Taq polymerase (Amersham), L-[14C]tyrosine (Moravek Biochemicals), and oligonucleotides (Life Technologies, Inc.). Automated DNA sequencing was performed by the DNA sequencing facility at Iowa State University using dye-labeled dideoxy terminators. All other chemicals and reagents were purchased from Fisher.

Plasmid Purification and DNA Sequencing

All plasmids were purified on CsCl gradients (24, 25). For clone 186313 and the pHYTS1 expression plasmid, both DNA strands were sequenced using the following primers2: M13 reverse primer (-190), HYTS Exp Fwd (21), HYTS-S1 (181), HYTS-S3 (460), HYTS-S5 (794), HPR7 (1083), HPR9 (1338), HYTS-S2 (193), HYTS-S4 (494), HYTS-S6 (818), HPR8 (1104), HPR10 (1407), HYTS Exp Rvs (1626). For all other clones, the sense strand was sequenced in entirety, and ambiguities in the sequences were resolved by sequencing the appropriate regions of the complementary strand. SeqEd (v1.0.3, Applied Biosystems) was used to align overlapping sequences, assess the quality of the sequencing results, and determine the consensus sequence for each cDNA.

Data base searching was performed using the European Bioinformatics Institute implementation of FASTA (26), the Stanford University implementation of BLAST (27), and the Baylor College of Medicine implementation of BEAUTY (28). Multiple alignment of amino acid sequences was performed using the Baylor College of Medicine implementation of ClustalW (29, 30). All data base searches and multiple sequence alignments used the default parameters for each program implementation.

Construction of the pHYTS2 Expression Plasmid

Subcloning of the human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase cDNA from clone 186313 into the pET-30a vector for expression of recombinant tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase protein in E. coli was performed in the following manner. First, the full-length human tyrosyl-tRNA cDNA from clone 186313 was amplified using the polymerase chain reaction with the HYTS Exp Fwd and HYTS Exp Rvs primers described above. These primers contain BglII and HindIII sites near their 5' termini, respectively. Following amplification, the human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase cDNA was gel-purified, digested with BglII and HindIII, and ligated into a pET-30a(+) vector that had been previously digested with BamHI and HindIII. The resulting plasmid, designated pHYTS1, contained an in-frame gene fusion between the 44-amino acid amino-terminal His-tag/S-tag leader sequence present in the pET-30a(+) vector and the human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase cDNA. Both strands of pHYTS1 were sequenced, and a single A to T point mutation was found at nucleotide 1000 (converting a lysyl codon into an isoleucyl codon in the mRNA sequence). To correct this mutation clone 186313 was digested with BamHI and NheI, and the fragment corresponding to nucleotides 963-1582 was purified on 1.5% agarose. This 620-base pair fragment was ligated into pHYTS1 that had been digested with BamHI and NheI. The resulting construct, designated pHYTS2, was sequenced to ensure that its nucleotide sequence is identical to the human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase sequence found in clone 186313.

Expression of Recombinant Human and B. stearothermophilus Tyrosyl-tRNA Synthetases in E. coli

BL21DE3 pLysS E. coli cells harboring the pHYTS2 plasmid were grown to saturation at 37 °C in 2 × TY medium containing 50 µg/liter kanamycin and 0.5 mM isopropyl-beta -D-thiogalactopyranoside. Recombinant human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase was harvested as described by Qiagen (protocol 5 in the QIAexpressionist). Briefly, this involved lysing the cells and binding the His-tagged recombinant human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase to Ni-NTA resin. After washing the Ni-NTA resin with 50 mM sodium phosphate, 300 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, pH 6.0 buffer, recombinant human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase was eluted from the column using a step gradient from 0 to 0.5 M imidazole. Recombinant human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase was then dialyzed against buffer A (20 mM Tris, pH 7.8, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM beta -mercaptoethanol) containing 1 mM sodium pyrophosphate (to remove any enzyme-bound tyrosyl adenylate) and 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, followed by three changes of buffer A without sodium pyrophosphate. The final dialysis buffer contained 10% glycerol.

B. stearothermophilus tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase was purified from TG2 cells harboring the pYTS5 plasmid as described previously (31). The concentrations of human and B. stearothermophilus tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases were determined by active site titration using L-[14C]tyrosine to monitor tyrosyl-adenylate formation (32). SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (33) and modified Western blot analysis using the S-Tag Western blot kit (34) were used to assess the purity of the tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases and to estimate the molecular weight of the recombinant human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase.

In Vitro Transcription and Purification of Human and B. stearothermophilus tRNATyr

B. stearothermophilus tRNATyr was transcribed in vitro from pGFX-WT, a derivative of the plasmid pGAG2 (35) in which a FokI restriction site replaces the BstNI cleavage site in pGAG2 such that digestion with FokI, and subsequent in vitro transcription of the digested pGFX-WT plasmid by T7 RNA polymerase, produces tRNATyr containing an intact -CCA 3' terminus. Details of the construction of the pGFX-WT plasmid will be published elsewhere.

Three consecutive rounds of polymerase chain reaction mutagenesis (36) were used to replace the B. stearothermophilus tRNATyr cDNA in pGFX-WT with the cDNA sequence for human placental tRNATyr (GenBankTM accession number Hstrny1r), generating the pHYR-WT plasmid. Digestion of pHYR-WT by FokI, followed by in vitro transcription using T7 RNA polymerase, yields the human tRNATyr product. In vitro transcription of the B. stearothermophilus and human tRNATyr substrates from the pGFX-WT and pHYR-WT plasmids was performed as described by Avis et al. (35) with the modification that the plasmids were digested with FokI rather than BstNI. In vitro transcribed tRNATyr products were purified on 12% polyacrylamide gels (37). Purified tRNATyr products were resuspended in diethylpyrocarbonate-treated water containing 10 mM MgCl2, heated to 75 °C, and slowly cooled to room temperature over a period of 30-60 min to allow annealing of the tRNATyr substrates to occur.


RESULTS

Comparison of Human Tyrosyl-tRNA Synthetases from Different cDNA Libraries

To ensure that the tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase cDNA used in subsequent experiments corresponds to the predominant form found in humans, cDNAs from several different libraries were sequenced. Specifically, the following cDNAs were sequenced3: 186313 (TIGR, adult white blood cells), 151265 (TIGR, female infant brain), 160622 (TIGR, adult white blood cells), 109082 (TIGR, adult colon),4 132369 (TIGR, six week old infant),3 53277 (I.M.A.G.E. Consortium, infant brain), and 124918 (I.M.A.G.E. Consortium, fetal liver, spleen). Clones 186313, 151265, and 160622 contain full-length cDNA sequences, clone 109082 is missing the first 181 nucleotides of the coding sequence, clone 132369 is missing the first 792 nucleotides of the coding sequence, clone 53277 is missing the first 426 nucleotides of the coding sequence, and the nucleotide sequence of clone 124918 corresponds to that of the human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase cDNA coding sequence through nucleotide 685, and then diverges into an unrelated sequence. In all of the cDNA clones examined (with the exception of the truncated clone 124918), the nucleotide sequence differs from the previously reported cDNA sequence for human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase5 (39) by the insertion of a cytosine at position 1061. This additional nucleotide base alters the reading frame of the cDNA sequence, which extends the open reading frame an additional 525 nucleotides.

Within the coding sequence, we observed the following heterogeneity among the cDNA clones. In clone 151265, nucleotides A484 through C489 are absent, resulting in deletion of serine 161 and glycine 162 in the translated protein. Clone 160622 has a guanosine deleted at position 7 in the coding sequence and a thymine inserted at position 479, resulting in an open reading frame from nucleotide 631 to nucleotide 1584. 

Comparison of the Human Tyrosyl-tRNA Synthetase Amino Acid Sequence with Tyrosyl-tRNA Synthetase from Other Species

If the hypothesis that tRNATyr recognition differs between eukaryotic and bacterial tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases is correct, one would expect these differences to be reflected in both the nucleotide sequences of tRNATyr and the amino acid sequences of the tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases. Comparison of tRNATyr sequences indicates that in bacteria, tRNATyr is a type II tRNA, whereas in eukaryotes tRNATyr is a type I tRNA (16, 17), supporting the above hypothesis. Comparison of the amino acid sequences of tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases further supports the above hypothesis. Human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase is 53% identical at the amino acid level to the S. cerevisiae homologue (excluding the carboxyl-terminal domain of human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase), 36% identical to the homologue from the archaeon Methanococcus jannaschii, and 16% identical to the B. stearothermophilus homologue (Fig. 1). Notably, nine of the fifteen amino acids involved in stabilizing the transition state for the first step of the reaction in the B. stearothermophilus enzyme (11, 40, 41) are conserved in the human, M. jannaschii, and S. cerevisiae enzymes. In contrast, none of the eleven amino acids known to be involved in tRNATyr recognition (42-47) are conserved between the human and B. stearothermophilus tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases, suggesting that in contrast to the mechanism for formation of the E·Tyr-AMP intermediate, tRNATyr recognition differs between eukaryotes, archaea, and bacteria. This is most apparent in the M. jannaschii amino acid sequence, which surprisingly is missing a substantial portion of the tRNATyr anticodon recognition domain (amino acids 330-419 in the B. stearothermophilus enzyme).


Fig. 1. Alignment of deduced amino acid sequences for tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase. Although only the sequences for tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase from human (H. sapiens), S. cerevisiae, M. jannaschii, and B. stearothermophilus are shown, the alignment shown is based on the ClustalW alignment of tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase amino acid sequences from Homo sapiens, S. cerevisiae (cytoplasmic), M. jannaschii, B. stearothermophilus, E. coli, Hemophilus influenzae, and Thiobacillus ferrioxidans. Assignment of secondary structure is based on the structure of the B. stearothermophilus enzyme as determined by x-ray crystallography (10). Conserved amino acids are boxed, shaded regions indicate conserved amino acids that participate in tyrosyl-adenylate formation, and amino acids in boldface type indicate those amino acids in the B. stearothermophilus enzyme that are highly conserved in other bacterial homologues.
[View Larger Version of this Image (90K GIF file)]

Human Tyrosyl-tRNA Synthetase Contains an EMAP II-like Domain

FASTA and BLAST searches of the GenBankTM nucleotide sequence data base identified proteins with significant homology to the carboxyl-terminal domain of human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase. In particular, the EMAP II initially isolated from murine fibrosarcoma cells (48), methionyl-tRNA synthetase from C. elegans (49), and the Arc1p protein from S. cerevisiae (22) were found to be 49, 50, and 43% identical to the carboxyl-terminal domain of human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase at the amino acid sequence level (Fig. 2). In addition, the carboxyl-terminal domains of methionyl-tRNA synthetases from bacterial sources show more limited homologies to the carboxyl-terminal domain of human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase. The sequence similarities observed between Arc1p, EMAP II, and the methionyl-tRNA synthetases have been previously reported (50). Furthermore, EMAP II has recently been found to be identical to the p18 protein component of the 24 S aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase complex found in mammalian cells.6


Fig. 2. Alignment of human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase carboxyl-terminal domain homologues. Although only the human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase, human EMAP II, S. cerevisiae Arc1p, and C. elegans, E. coli, and H. influenzae methionyl-tRNA synthetase sequences are shown, the actual alignment of these sequences is based on a ClustalW alignment of the carboxyl-terminal domain of human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase (TyrRS), H. sapiens and Mus musculus endothelial monocyte-activating protein II (EMAP II), S. cerevisiae Arc1p (Arc1p), and the carboxyl-terminal domains of methionyl-tRNA synthetase (MetRS) from C. elegans, S. cerevisiae, Bacillus subtilis, B. stearothermophilus, T. ferrioxidans, E. coli, H. influenzae, and M. genitalium.
[View Larger Version of this Image (46K GIF file)]

To quantify the similarity between the amino acid sequences for the carboxyl-terminal domains of the human tyrosyl- and methionyl-tRNA synthetases, we analyzed expressed sequence tags that have been putatively identified as the carboxyl-terminal domains of human methionyl-tRNA synthetase (I.M.A.G.E. clone accession numbers 33689, L1914, and 46655). The nucleotide sequence of the carboxyl-terminal domain of tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase was 100% identical to a consensus sequence of these expressed sequence tags, suggesting that the ESTs have been incorrectly assigned due to the similarity of their sequences to the C. elegans methionyl-tRNA synthetase. The recent finding that, in contrast to the C. elegans enzyme, the human methionyl-tRNA synthetase does not have an EMAP II-like domain at its carboxyl terminus is consistent with this hypothesis.

Expression of the Recombinant Human Tyrosyl-tRNA Synthetase in E. coli

To further characterize the human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase, the cDNA sequence from clone 186313 was subcloned into the pET-30a vector, and the resulting plasmid was designated pHYTS2. Recombinant human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase purified from BL21DE3 pLysS cells harboring pHYTS2 contains both a His-tag and an S-tag on its amino terminus (34, 51). SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the recombinant human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase at various stages of purification is shown in Fig. 3. Based on its mobility on SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, the recombinant protein has an apparent molecular mass of approximately 65,500 Da. This is in good agreement with the predicted molecular mass of 69,773 Da and previously published molecular mass estimates for other mammalian tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases (18, 52) and indicates that the carboxyl-terminal domain of the recombinant enzyme is translated in E. coli. Active site titration confirms that the purified recombinant enzyme is active and able to form the E·Tyr-AMP intermediate (data not shown).


Fig. 3. SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of recombinant human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase expressed in E. coli. Lane A, molecular mass standards (shown in kDa on figure) myosin (200,000 Da), beta -galactosidase (116,250 Da), phosphorylase B (97,400 Da), bovine serum albumin (66,200 Da), ovalbumin (45,000 Da), and carbonic anhydrase (31,000 Da); lane B, uninduced BL21 DE3 pLysS E. coli cells harboring the pHYTS2 plasmid; lane C, isopropyl-beta -D-thiogalactopyranoside-induced BL21DE3 pLysS E. coli cells harboring the pHYTS2 plasmid; lane D, recombinant human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase purified on Ni-NTA resin.
[View Larger Version of this Image (59K GIF file)]

To determine whether there are mechanistic differences in the way human and bacterial tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases recognize and aminoacylate their cognate tRNA substrates, tRNATyr substrates corresponding to tRNATyr from B. stearothermophilus (35, 53) and human placenta (54) were transcribed in vitro, gel purified, and annealed. These tRNAs were used as substrates for aminoacylation by human and B. stearothermophilus tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase. As shown in Fig. 4, recombinant human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase fully aminoacylates the human tRNATyr but fails to aminoacylate more than 10% of the B. stearothermophilus tRNATyr during the time course of the assay. This is in contrast to the recombinant B. stearothermophilus tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase, which fully aminoacylates B. stearothermophilus tRNATyr but fails to aminoacylate the human tRNATyr above background levels.


Fig. 4. Aminoacylation kinetics of human and B. stearothermophilus tRNATyr. Dashed lines represent tyrosylation of human tRNATyr by the human (bullet ) and B. stearothermophilus (diamond ) tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases. Solid lines represent tyrosylation of B. stearothermophilus tRNATyr by human (open circle ) and B. stearothermophilus (black-diamond ) tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases.
[View Larger Version of this Image (23K GIF file)]


DISCUSSION

If the hypothesis that tRNATyr recognition differs between bacterial and eukaryotic tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases is correct, one would predict that these differences should show up in three different ways. First, the nucleotide sequences of the tRNATyr substrates should differ significantly between bacteria and eukaryotes. In this regard, tRNATyr is unique among tRNAs in that the nucleotide sequence of bacterial tRNATyr is a type II tRNA sequence, whereas eukaryotic tRNATyr substrates are type I tRNAs (16, 17). Differences in tRNATyr recognition should also be reflected in the amino acid sequences of bacterial and eukaryotic tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases. That this is the case is indicated by the observation that amino acids that are involved in tRNATyr recognition by B. stearothermophilus tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase are not conserved in the human form of the enzyme. The observation that the KMSKS and HIGH signature sequences are aligned, as well as the conservation of nine amino acids involved in tyrosyl adenylate formation, indicates that the absence of conserved amino acids involved in tRNATyr recognition in the human enzyme has physiological relevance and is not the result of a faulty alignment of the sequences. Finally, the most definitive indication that tRNATyr recognition differs between bacteria and humans comes from the observation that the B. stearothermophilus and human enzymes are unable to aminoacylate each other's tRNATyr substrates. These results are in good agreement with previously published comparisons between bacterial and eukaryotic tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases (17-21). Similar species specificity has also been observed for several other aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (55-59) and is consistent with the hypothesis that the recognition of tRNA by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases was still evolving after the divergence of bacteria and eukaryotes (39). The observation that tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase from the archaeon M. jannaschii lacks a substantial portion of the tRNA anticodon recognition domain suggests that the archaea may recognize and bind tRNATyr in a manner distinct from that found in both bacteria and eukaryotes.

The absence of an EMAP II-like domain in tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases from S. cerevisiae and bacteria suggests that its appearance on the carboxyl terminus of human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase is the result of a relatively recent evolutionary event. The presence of a distantly related homologue of this domain in E. coli methionyl-tRNA synthetase suggests this EMAP II-like domain in tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase is derived from the carboxyl-terminal domain of methionyl-tRNA synthetase, although it should be noted that the E. coli phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase also contains a distantly related homologue of the EMAP II-like domain in human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase (22). In eukaryotes, homologues showing 43-50% sequence identity include the Arc1p protein from S. cerevisiae, EMAP II from human and mouse tissue, and methionyl-tRNA synthetase from C. elegans. The occurrence of this EMAP II-like domain in several different proteins that are either aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases or are associated with aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases in protein complexes suggests that these domains perform a common function in tRNA aminoacylation. The observation that Arc1p binds tRNA nonspecifically (22) is consistent with this hypothesis. In this regard it is interesting that for S. cerevisiae and humans the carboxyl-terminal EMAP II-like domain in methionyl-tRNA synthetase has been lost, and its function appears to have been replaced by Arc1p in S. cerevisiae and EMAP II in humans (EMAP II is identical to the p18 component of the 24 S aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase complex),6 both of which interact with more than one aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase. The selective advantage of allowing multiple aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases to have access to the EMAP II-like domain is reflected in the observation that replacement of the carboxyl-terminal domain by a separate protein occurred at least twice during the evolution of eukaryotic methionyl-tRNA synthetases since this domain is absent in the methionyl-tRNA synthetases from both S. cerevisiae and humans but is present in methionyl-tRNA synthetase from C. elegans (49, 60, 61).

As discussed above, the homologous domains in human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase, Arc1p, EMAP II, and C. elegans methionyl-tRNA synthetase may perform similar functions. The most thoroughly characterized of these proteins is Arc1p from S. cerevisiae. Arc1p was initially isolated using a synthetic lethal genetic screen to identify proteins that interact with components of the tRNA nuclear export machinery (22). Arc1p consists of three domains: an amino-terminal domain that binds the methionyl- and glutamyl-tRNA synthetases, a lysine- and alanine-rich central domain that is 34% identical to histone H1, and a carboxyl-terminal domain that is 54% identical to EMAP II and binds tRNA nonspecifically (22). Steady state kinetic analyses indicate that Arc1p increases the rate of methionyl-tRNA synthetase-catalyzed tRNAMet aminoacylation (22). Based on these observations, Simos et al. (22) postulated that Arc1p participates in directing tRNA to the active sites of the methionyl- and glutamyl-tRNA synthetases. It is likely that the carboxyl-terminal domain in human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase has a function similar to that of Arc1p namely directing tRNA to the active site of tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase. This hypothesis is consistent with the observation that in mammalian cells tRNAs are not free to diffuse in the cytoplasm but appear to be "channeled" by the translation machinery (62, 63).

While it is likely that both the carboxyl-terminal domain of human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase and the EMAP II protein participate in directing tRNA to the active sites of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, the ability of the EMAP II protein to induce cell migration, tissue factor activity, and cell surface expression of P- and E-selectins in endothelial cells, as well as its ability to induce mRNA synthesis of tumor necrosis factor alpha , tissue factor, and interleukin 8 in monocytes, suggests that EMAP II may have an alternate role as a cytokine (48, 64). As the amino acid sequence of the carboxyl-terminal domain of human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase is 49% identical to the EMAP II sequence, it is possible that it may also exhibit cytokine-like activities. At the present time, however, there is no evidence supporting this hypothesis.

A third possible function for the carboxyl-terminal domain of human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase is as a mediator of protein-protein interactions. In E. coli methionyl-tRNA synthetase, the carboxyl-terminal domain is responsible for dimerization of the enzyme (65). Although these carboxyl-terminal domains are distantly related to the carboxyl-terminal domain of human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase, the human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase presumably dimerizes through the Rossmann fold domain, as is the case for the B. stearothermophilus enzyme (10, 38). In addition, purification of tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase from porcine and rabbit tissue (18, 52) indicates that in mammalian cells this enzyme is not part of a larger multiprotein complex, suggesting that it does not form strong protein-protein interactions in vivo.

Sequence analysis of the human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase coding sequence has revealed the existence of a novel carboxyl-terminal domain that is not present in previously sequenced tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases from other organisms. The similarity of this domain to the amino acid sequences of the carboxyl-terminal domains of C. elegans methionyl-tRNA synthetase, the Arc1p protein, and EMAP II suggests that in the human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase this domain may be involved in directing tRNA to the active site of the enzyme, thereby facilitating the aminoacylation of tRNATyr. The validity of this hypothesis is currently being determined.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant GM53693-01 and grants from the Biomedical Research Foundation of Northwest Louisiana, and the Center for Excellence in Cancer Research at Louisiana State University Medical Center-Shreveport.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) U89436[GenBank].


Dagger    These authors contributed equally to this research.
§   To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 318-675-7779; Fax: 318-675-5180; E-mail: efirst{at}lsumc.edu.
1   The abbreviations used are: EMAP II, endothelial monocyte-activating protein II; Ni-NTA, nickel-nitriloacetic acid.
2   The first seven primers are complementary to the antisense strand of the cDNA, and the remaining six primers are complementary to the sense strand; positions of the 3' ends of each primer relative to the ATG start codon are indicated in parentheses following the primer; all primers except HYTS Exp Fwd and HYTS Exp Rvs are 18 to 21 nucleotides in length.
3   Clone numbers refer to either the TIGR or I.M.A.G.E. Consortium accession numbers; clone source and tissues used to construct the cDNA libraries are shown in parentheses following the clone number.
4   The sequences of the initial clones we received bearing these accession numbers did not correspond to their expressed sequence tag sequences. We subsequently obtained the correct clones bearing these accession numbers from ATCC. TIGR and ATCC have since withdrawn these clones from their inventory of publicly available clones.
5   C. L. Quinn, GenBankTM accession number U40714[GenBank].
6   M. Mirande, personal communication.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Alan R. Fersht for the pYTS5 and pGAG2 clones, The Institute for Genome Research and the I.M.A.G.E. Consortium for cDNA clones, Dr. Peter Good for assistance and advice in searching sequence data bases and performing sequence alignments, the DNA Sequencing Facility at Iowa State University for performing the automated DNA sequencing, and the organizers of the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center Nucleic Acid and Protein Sequence Analysis Workshop for Biomedical Researchers for training in sequence analysis.


REFERENCES

  1. Eriani, G., Cavarelli, J., Martin, F., Ador, L., Rees, B., Thierry, J.-C., Gangloff, J., and Moras, D. (1995) J. Mol. Evol. 40, 499-508 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Moras, D. (1992) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2, 138-142 [CrossRef]
  3. Webster, T. A., Tsai, H., Kula, M., Mackie, G., and Schimmel, P. (1984) Science 226, 1315-1317 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Hountondji, C., Dessen, P., and Blanquet, S. (1986) Biochimie (Paris) 68, 1071-1078 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Brunie, S., Zelwer, C., and Risler, J.-L. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 216, 411-424 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Rould, M. A., Perona, J. J., and Steitz, T. A. (1991) Nature 352, 213-218 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Rould, M. A., Perona, J. J., Söll, D., and Steitz, T. A. (1989) Science 246, 1135-1142 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Doublie, S., Bricogne, G., Gilmore, C., and Carter, C. W. (1995) Structure (Lond.) 3, 17-31 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Brick, P., and Blow, D. M. (1987) J. Mol. Biol. 194, 287-297 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Brick, P., Bhat, T. N., and Blow, D. M. (1989) J. Mol. Biol. 208, 83-98 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Fersht, A. R. (1987) Biochemistry 26, 8031-8037 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Ward, W. H., and Fersht, A. R. (1988) Biochemistry 27, 1041-1049 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Ward, W. H., and Fersht, A. R. (1988) Biochemistry 27, 5525-5530 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Schwob, E., and Söll, D. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 5201-5208 [Abstract]
  15. Buechter, D. D., and Schimmel, P. (1993) Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 28, 309-322 [Abstract]
  16. Giegé, R., Puglisi, J. D., and Florentz, C. (1993) Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 45, 129-206 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Chow, C. M., and RajBhandary, U. L. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 12855-12863 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Clark, J. M., Jr., and Eyzaguirre, J. P. (1962) J. Biol. Chem. 237, 3698-3702 [Free Full Text]
  19. Doctor, B. P., and Mudd, J. A. (1963) J. Biol. Chem. 238, 3677-3681 [Free Full Text]
  20. Edwards, H., Trézéguet, V., and Schimmel, P. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 1153-1156 [Abstract]
  21. Quinn, C. L., Tao, N., and Schimmel, P. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 12489-12495 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Simos, G., Segref, A., Fasiolo, F., Hellmuth, K., Shevchenko, A., Mann, M., and Hurt, E. C. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 5437-5448 [Abstract]
  23. Lennon, G. G., Auffrey, C., Polymeropoulos, M., and Soares, M. B. (1996) Genomics 33, 151-152 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Radloff, R., Bauer, W., and Vinograd, J. (1967) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 57, 1514-1521 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Birnboim, H. C. (1983) Methods Enzymol. 100, 243-255 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Pearson, W. R. (1994) Methods Mol. Biol. 25, 365-389 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., and Lipman, D. J. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Worley, K. C., Wiese, B. A., and Smith, R. F. (1995) Genome Res. 5, 173-184 [Abstract]
  29. Higgins, D. G., and Sharp, P. M. (1988) Gene (Amst.) 73, 237-244 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G., and Gibson, T. J. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673-4680 [Abstract]
  31. First, E. A., and Fersht, A. R. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 13651-13657 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Wilkinson, A. J., Fersht, A. R., Blow, D. M., and Winter, G. (1983) Biochemistry 22, 3581-3586 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Kim, J.-S., and Raines, R. T. (1993) Protein Sci. 2, 348-356 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Avis, J. M., Day, A. G., Garcia, G. A., and Fersht, A. R. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 5312-5320 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Ho, S. N., Hunt, H. D., Horton, R. M., Pullen, J. K., and Pease, L. R. (1989) Gene (Amst.) 77, 51-59 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  38. Bhat, T. N., Blow, D. M., Brick, P., and Nyborg, J. (1982) J. Mol. Biol. 158, 699-709 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Ribas De Pouplana, L., Frugier, M., Quinn, C. L., and Schimmel, P. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 166-170 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Fersht, A. R., Knill-Jones, J. W., Bedouelle, H., and Winter, G. (1988) Biochemistry 27, 1581-1587 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. First, E. A., and Fersht, A. R. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 13658-13663 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Bedouelle, H., and Winter, G. (1986) Nature 320, 371-373 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Bedouelle, H. (1990) Biochimie (Paris) 72, 589-598 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Bedouelle, H., Guez-Ivanier, V., and Nageotte, R. (1993) Biochimie (Paris) 75, 1099-1108 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Bedouelle, H., and Nageotte, R. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 2945-2950 [Abstract]
  46. Labouze, E., and Bedouelle, H. (1989) J. Mol. Biol. 205, 729-735 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Vidal-Cros, A., and Bedouelle, H. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 223, 801-810 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Kao, J., Ryan, J., Brett, G., Chen, J., Shen, H., Fan, Y.-G., Godman, G., Familletti, P. C., Wang, F., Pan, Y.-C. E., Stern, D., and Clauss, M. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 20239-20247 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Wilson, R., Ainscough, R., Anderson, K., Baynes, C., Berks, M., Bonfield, J., Burton, J., Connell, M., Copsey, T., Cooper, J., Coulson, A., Craxton, M., Dear, S., Du, Z., Durbin, R., Favello, A., Fulton, L., Gardner, A., Green, P., Hawkins, T., Hillier, L., Jier, M., Johnston, L., Jones, M., Kershaw, J., Kirsten, J., Laister, N., Latreille, P., Lightning, J., Lloyd, C., McMurray, A., Mortimore, B., O'Callaghan, M., Parsons, J., Percy, C., Rifkin, L., Roopra, A., Saunders, D., Shownkeen, R., Smaldon, N., Smith, A., Sonnhammer, E., Staden, R., Sulston, J., Thierry-Mieg, J., Thomas, K., Vaudin, M., Vaughan, K., Waterston, R., Watson, A., Weinstock, L., Wilkinson-Sproat, J., and Wohldman, P. (1994) Nature 368, 32-38 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Frantz, J. D., and Gilbert, W. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 20692-20697 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Smith, M. C., Furman, T. C., Ingolia, T. D., and Pidgeon, C. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 7211-7215 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Wolfson, A. D., Motorin, Y. A., Ribkinska, T. I., and Beresten, S. F. (1990) J. Chromatogr. 503, 277-281 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  53. Simoncsits, A., Brownlee, G. G., Brown, R. S., Rubin, J. R., and Guilley, H. (1977) Nature 269, 833-836 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  54. van Tol, H., Stange, N., Gross, H. J., and Beier, H. (1987) EMBO J. 6, 35-41 [Abstract]
  55. Dorizzi, M., Merault, G., Fournier, M., Labouesse, J., Keith, G., Dirheimer, G., and Buckingham, R. H. (1977) Nucleic Acids Res. 4, 31-42 [Abstract]
  56. Meinnel, T., Mechulam, Y., Fayat, G., and Blanquet, S. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 4741-4746 [Abstract]
  57. Shiba, K., Schimmel, P., Motegi, H., and Noda, T. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 30049-30055 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Hipps, D., Shiba, K., Henderson, B., and Schimmel, P. (1995) Biochemistry 92, 5550-5552
  59. Drabkin, H. J., Park, H.-J., and RajBhandary, U. L. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 907-913 [Abstract]
  60. Walter, P., Gangloff, J., Bonnet, J., Boulanger, Y., Ebel, J.-P., and Fasiolo, F. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 80, 2437-2441 [Abstract]
  61. Lage, H., and Dietel, M. (1996) Gene (Amst.) 178, 187-189 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  62. Negrutskii, B. S., Stapulionis, R., and Deutscher, M. P. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 964-968 [Abstract]
  63. Stapulionis, R., and Deutscher, M. P. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 7158-7161 [Abstract]
  64. Kao, J., Houck, K., Fan, Y., Haehnel, I., Libutti, S. K., Kayton, M. L., Grikscheit, T., Chabot, J., Nowygrod, R., Greenberg, S., Kuang, W.-J., Leung, D. W., Hayward, J. R., Kisiel, W., Heath, M., Brett, J., and Stern, D. M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 25106-25119 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Cassio, D., and Waller, J.-P. (1971) Eur. J. Biochem. 20, 283-300 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.