COMMUNICATION:
Constitutive Activation of JAK1 in Src-transformed Cells*

(Received for publication, November 15, 1996)

George S. Campbell Dagger , Chao-Lan Yu , Richard Jove and Christin Carter-Su Dagger §

From the Dagger  Department of Physiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0622 and the  Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida 33612

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

We have previously found that the <UNL>s</UNL>ignal <UNL>t</UNL>ransducer and <UNL>a</UNL>ctivator of <UNL>t</UNL>ranscription (Stat) 3 is constitutively activated in cells stably transformed by the v-Src oncoprotein. While activation of Stat proteins has also been observed following epidermal growth factor or platelet-derived growth factor stimulation, Stat3 activation is more commonly associated with signaling through cytokine receptors and activation of the Janus family tyrosine kinases JAK1 or JAK2. We therefore investigated whether JAK1 or JAK2 were activated in Src-transformed cells. In three v-Src-transformed fibroblast cell lines (NIH3T3, Balb/c, and 3Y1), JAK1 displayed increased tyrosyl phosphorylation compared to non-transformed cells. The level of tyrosyl phosphorylation of JAK1 was significantly greater in NIH3T3 cells transformed by expression of v-Src or high levels of a constitutively active mutant of c-Src (Y527F) than in cells overexpressing the less transforming normal c-Src. Enzymatic activity of JAK1 was assessed using autophosphorylation assays. In anti-JAK1 immunoprecipitates from v-Src-transformed NIH3T3 cells, a protein with the same migration as JAK1 showed substantially increased levels of 32P incorporation compared to immunoprecipitates from non-transformed cells. Similar results were obtained using anti-JAK2 immunoprecipitates; however, the level of JAK2 tyrosyl phosphorylation and 32P incorporation in anti-JAK2 immunoprecipitates were markedly lower than in anti-JAK1 immunoprecipitates. We conclude that JAK1, and possibly JAK2, are constitutively activated in Src-transformed cells, raising the possibility that Janus family kinases contribute to the constitutive activation of Stat3 previously observed in these cells and/or other properties of Src-transformed cells.


INTRODUCTION

The product of the v-src oncogene, v-Src, is a constitutively activated protein-tyrosine kinase that is thought to induce cell transformation through unregulated tyrosyl phosphorylation and activation of normal cellular pathways involved in the control of cellular growth (1, 2). Although transformation by oncogenic forms of Src is one of the most thoroughly characterized models of cell transformation, the biochemical pathways that link this activated kinase to changes in cellular physiology and proliferation have not been fully elucidated. Clearly, changes in gene expression are a requisite part of the transformation process initiated by v-src or any other oncogene (3). Little is understood, however, about the mechanisms by which the v-Src tyrosine kinase at the cell membrane regulates the expression of genes in the nucleus.

The <UNL>s</UNL>ignal <UNL>t</UNL>ransducers and <UNL>a</UNL>ctivators of <UNL>t</UNL>ranscription (Stats)1 are a family of latent cytoplasmic transcription factors that are activated by phosphorylation. Stat proteins become tyrosyl-phosphorylated following activation of a number of receptor-tyrosine kinase signaling complexes. Tyrosyl-phosphorylated Stats form homo- and heterodimeric complexes that, at least in some cases, may also include additional non-Stat accessory proteins. These complexes migrate to the nucleus where they bind specific DNA elements within the promoters of appropriate target genes (4, 5). While tyrosyl phosphorylation is necessary for Stat complex formation and DNA binding, additional phosphorylation of specific serine and/or threonine residues has been shown to be required for several Statcontaining complexes to function as transcriptional activators (6, 7).

Although Stat activation has been described following activation of the receptor tyrosine kinases for epidermal growth factor (EGF) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) (8-10), Stat activation is more commonly associated with signaling through the Janus (or JAK) tyrosine kinase family (5). This signaling system, often referred to as the JAK-Stat pathway, appears to be a major route for transcriptional regulation controlled by a diverse array of growth factors, differentiation factors, and hormones that signal through receptors of the cytokine/hematopoietin family. Ligand engagement of receptors promotes activation of receptor-associated JAKs, with the subsequent formation of one or more Stat complexes and transcriptional activation of factor-dependent target genes. Both Stat and JAK activation are transient, even in the continuous presence of the activating ligand, suggesting that JAK-Stat pathways are normally tightly regulated.

In rat and murine fibroblasts transformed by various oncogenic forms of Src, we observed that Stat3 is constitutively tyrosyl-phosphorylated and present in a complex competent to bind DNA (11), suggesting that genes normally transcriptionally activated by Stat3 may be constitutively activated in Src-transformed cells. The mechanism by which Src transformation promotes activation of Stat3 is not known. Although data from experiments involving co-expression of Stat3 and v-Src in yeast indicate that v-Src is capable of directly phosphorylating Stat3,2 we investigated whether Src might also be acting through the typical upstream activators of Stat3, the Janus kinases JAK1 and/or JAK2. In this report we show that JAK1, and possibly JAK2, are constitutively activated in Src-transformed cells.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Cells and Reagents

3Y1, NIH3T3, Balb/c, and their Src-transformed counterparts have been described earlier (11-13). Anti-JAK2 serum (alpha JAK2), raised against a synthetic peptide corresponding to amino acids 758-776, was prepared in our laboratory in conjunction with Pel Freez Laboratories as described previously (9). Anti-JAK1 serum (alpha JAK1), raised against a synthetic peptide corresponding to amino acids 785-804 of murine JAK1, was kindly provided by J. Ihle, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN. Anti-Src monoclonal N2-17 was obtained from the NCI repository (Quality Biotech.). Mouse monoclonal anti-phosphotyrosine antibody 4G10 (alpha PY) was purchased from Upstate Biotechnology Inc. Triton X-100 came from Pierce, recombinant protein A-agarose from Repligen, and enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection system from Amersham Corp. All other reagents were of reagent grade or better.

Immunoprecipitation and Western Blotting

Exponentially growing cultures were rinsed three times with PBSV (10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, 137 mM NaCl, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate) and scraped in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 0.1% Triton X-100, 137 mM NaCl, 2 mM EGTA, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and 10 µg/ml leupeptin) on ice. Cell lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min and the resulting supernatants were incubated on ice for 2 h with the indicated antibody. Immune complexes were collected on protein A-agarose during a 60-min incubation at 8 °C, washed three times with 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 0.1% Triton X-100, 137 mM NaCl, 2 mM EGTA and boiled for 5 min in a mixture (80:20) of lysis buffer and 5 × SDS-PAGE sample buffer (250 mM Tris (pH 6.8), 10% SDS, 10% beta -mercaptoethanol, and 40% glycerol). The supernatant was subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by Western blot analysis with the indicated antibody using the ECL detection system (14).

Kinase Assays

Exponentially growing cultures were rinsed three times with PBSV and scraped on ice in 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and 10 µg/ml leupeptin). Cell lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min, and the resulting supernatants were incubated on ice for 2 h with the indicated antibody. Immune complexes were collected on protein A-agarose during a 60-min incubation at 8 °C, washed twice with wash buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 150 mM NaCl) and once with phosphorylation buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 6.25 mM manganese chloride, 100 mM NaCl). For autophosphorylation assays, 100 µl of phosphorylation buffer containing ~100 µCi of gamma -[32P]ATP and 100 µg/ml each of aprotinin and leupeptin was added directly to the immune complexes on ice. Reactions were incubated at 30 °C for 10 min (a time at which 32P incorporation was still in the linear range) then stopped by addition of stop buffer (wash buffer containing 10 mM EDTA). The immune complexes were washed once with stop buffer, twice with wash buffer, and boiled for 5 min in SDS-PAGE sample buffer. Solubilized proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE on 3-10% polyacrylamide gradient gels. Phosphorylated proteins were visualized by autoradiography.


RESULTS

JAK1 and JAK2 Are Tyrosyl-phosphorylated in v-Src-transformed Cells

Since the Janus kinases are tyrosyl-phosphorylated when activated, we first examined whether JAK1 or JAK2 displays increased tyrosyl phosphorylation in v-Src-transformed cells. JAK1 and JAK2 were immunoprecipitated from rat 3Y1, murine NIH3T3, or murine Balb/c cells and their v-Src-transformed counterparts SR1, NIH-VS, and Balb/c-VS, respectively. The immunoprecipitated proteins were analyzed by Western blotting using an antibody to phosphotyrosine (alpha PY) (Fig. 1). Both JAK1 and JAK2 showed increased levels of tyrosyl phosphorylation in all three v-Src-transformed lines when compared to their non-transformed counterparts. However, the apparent level of tyrosyl phosphorylation in the alpha JAK1 immunoprecipitates was substantially greater than that observed in alpha JAK2 immunoprecipitates. Additionally, while an elevated level of JAK1 tyrosyl phosphorylation was detectable in all experiments, tyrosyl phosphorylation of JAK2 was more variable, being undetectable in some experiments.


Fig. 1. JAK1 and JAK2 show increased tyrosyl phosphorylation in v-Src-transformed cells. alpha JAK1 (lanes A-F) and alpha JAK2 (lanes G-L) immunoprecipitates were prepared from actively growing subconfluent cultures of rat 3Y1 (lanes A and G), mouse NIH3T3 (lanes C and I), or Balb/c cells (lanes E and K) and their v-Src-transformed counterparts rat 3Y1 (lanes B and H), mouse NIH3T3 (lanes D and J), or Balb/c cells (lanes F and L). The immunoprecipitates were divided equally and subjected to immunoblot analysis using alpha PY (upper panel) or the immunoprecipitating antibody (lower panel).
[View Larger Version of this Image (63K GIF file)]


The increased levels of tyrosyl-phosphorylated JAK1 and JAK2 reflect increased tyrosyl phosphorylation of the proteins rather than increased levels of expression. Expression of v-Src did not increase expression levels of JAK1 or JAK2 in any of the three cell lines as judged by Western blotting (data not shown). In fact, NIH3T3 cells expressing v-Src or other Src variants (see below) had slightly decreased (by 30-40%) JAK1 expression compared to untransformed NIH3T3 cells.

Interestingly, alpha JAK1 immunoprecipitates from v-Src-transformed cells contained a number of other tyrosyl-phosphorylated proteins in addition to JAK1 (Fig. 1, lanes B, D, and F). Additional tyrosyl-phosphorylated proteins were also apparent in the alpha JAK2 immunoprecipitates (Fig. 1, lanes H, J, and L) but, like the tyrosyl phosphorylation of JAK2 itself, their number, intensity, and reproducibility were less than observed in alpha JAK1 immunoprecipitates. One of these associated proteins appears to be Src (see below). While we do not know the identity of any of the other proteins at the present time, they may represent potential JAK substrates.

The Level of Tyrosyl Phosphorylation of JAK1 and -2 Parallels the Transforming Potency of Src

We examined the level of tyrosyl phosphorylation of JAK1 and JAK2 in cells overexpressing forms of Src with different transforming potency (Fig. 2). JAK1 (Fig. 2, lanes A-D) and JAK2 (Fig. 2, lanes E-H) were immunoprecipitated from control NIH3T3 cells (Fig. 2, lanes A and E) and from NIH3T3 cells transformed by high levels of expression of normal c-Src (Fig. 2, lanes B and F), the Y527F constitutively active mutant of c-Src (Fig. 2, lanes C and G) or v-Src (Fig. 2, lanes D and H), and analyzed by immunoblotting with alpha PY. The level of tyrosyl-phosphorylated JAK1 and JAK2 was significantly higher in immunoprecipitates from cells transformed by the more highly transforming c-Src Y527F and v-Src than in cells partially transformed by overexpression of the more weakly transforming normal c-Src.


Fig. 2. JAK1 and JAK2 show greater tyrosyl phosphorylation in cells transformed by more oncogenic variants of Src. alpha JAK1 (lanes A-D) and alpha JAK2 (lanes E-H) immunoprecipitates were prepared from actively growing subconfluent cultures of NIH3T3 cells (lanes A and E) and NIH3T3 cells transformed by overexpression of normal c-Src (lanes B and F), expression of c-Src Y527F (lanes C and G), or v-Src (lanes D and H). The immunoprecipitated proteins were subjected to Western blot analysis using alpha PY. Immunoblot analysis of equivalent immunoprecipitates with the immunoprecipitating antibody (alpha JAK1 or alpha JAK2) showed that equal amounts of JAK1 and JAK2 were present in the immunoprecipitates from each of the four different cell lines (data not shown). The unlabeled arrow (black-triangle-right ) marks the estimated migration of Src proteins.
[View Larger Version of this Image (57K GIF file)]


Src Co-precipitates with JAK1

The alpha JAK immunoprecipitates from Src expressing NIH3T3 cells contain tyrosyl-phosphorylated proteins migrating at a position appropriate for Src (Fig. 2). To test if Src was indeed present, we used an anti-Src antibody to probe alpha JAK1 immunoprecipitates from control, c-Src overexpressing, and v-Src expressing NIH3T3 cells (Fig. 3, lanes A-C). alpha Src recognized a band of the appropriate size (~60 kDa) for Src in immunoprecipitates from cells either expressing v-Src or overexpressing c-Src. No Src was detected in immunoprecipitates from control NIH3T3 cells or where non-immune serum was used in place of alpha JAK1 (data not shown). Significantly more Src was detected in the immunoprecipitates from cells overexpressing c-Src than in those from v-Src-transformed cells. Western blotting of alpha Src immunoprecipitates with alpha Src (Fig. 3, lanes D-F) indicated that this difference most likely reflects the different levels of Src protein expressed in these two cell lines.


Fig. 3. Src co-precipitates with JAK1. Lysates of NIH3T3 cells (lanes A and D) and NIH3T3 cells transformed by v-Src (lanes C and F) or overexpression of c-Src (lanes B and E) were immunoprecipitated with alpha JAK1 (lanes A-C) or alpha Src (lanes D-F). The immunoprecipitated proteins were subjected to immunoblot analysis using alpha Src. Equivalent amounts of cellular protein were used in each immunoprecipitate, and the two panels shown are from the same experiment. The exposure time for the autoradiograph shown for lanes A-C was 6 times longer than that for lanes D-F.
[View Larger Version of this Image (41K GIF file)]


JAK1 and JAK2 Immunoprecipitates from v-Src-transformed Cells Have Increased Kinase Activity

We sought to determine if JAKs 1 and 2 isolated from Src-transformed cells possess increased enzymatic activity in addition to their increased level of tyrosyl phosphorylation. alpha JAK1 and alpha JAK2 immunoprecipitates from normal and Src-transformed cells were subjected to immune-complex kinase assays to measure autophosphorylation. In alpha JAK1 immunoprecipitates assayed for kinase activity, a protein with the same migration as JAK1 displays increased incorporation of 32P in immunoprecipitates from v-Src-transformed NIH3T3 cells compared to untransformed cells (Fig. 4, lane B). The amount of JAK1 present in each immunoprecipitate was the same as judged by Western blotting with alpha JAK1 (data not shown). In addition to JAK1, several other proteins had increased 32P incorporation in immunoprecipitates from v-Src-transformed cells and may represent JAK1-associated proteins. Preincubation of alpha JAK1 with its antigenic peptide (Fig. 4, lane C), but not with an analogous peptide derived from JAK2 (Fig. 4, lane D), prevented the appearance of all bands showing increased phosphorylation in immunoprecipitates from v-Src-transformed cells. These bands were also absent when non-immune rabbit serum was used in place of alpha JAK1 (Fig. 4, lane E). When alpha JAK2 was used instead of alpha JAK1 (data not shown), the results obtained were essentially the same with one important exception. The amount of kinase activity present in the alpha JAK2 immunoprecipitates was approximately 100-fold lower than that in the alpha JAK1 immunoprecipitates as judged by the length of exposure required to obtain a detectable signal (approximately 15 min for JAK1 versus 24 h for JAK2).


Fig. 4. Autokinase activity in alpha JAK1 immunoprecipitates. Lysates of actively growing subconfluent cultures of NIH3T3 cells (lane A) and v-Src-transformed NIH3T3 cells (lanes B-E) were subjected to immunoprecipitation with alpha JAK1 (lanes A and B), alpha JAK1 which had been preincubated with its antigenic peptide (lane C), alpha JAK1 which had been preincubated with an analogous, but non cross-reactive peptide derived from JAK2 (lane D), or non-immune rabbit serum (lane E). Immunoprecipitates were assayed for autophosphorylation as described under "Experimental Procedures."
[View Larger Version of this Image (81K GIF file)]


Consistent with the kinase activity in alpha JAK1 immunoprecipitates originating with JAK1 and not v-Src, we did not observe a phosphorylated protein with a migration appropriate for v-Src even though the experiments depicted in Fig. 3 suggest that a small amount of v-Src co-precipitates with JAK1. The absence of a band in Fig. 4 corresponding in size to Src is most likely explained by the very low levels of Src, especially v-Src, in alpha JAK1 immunoprecipitates. Alternately, it might be that the Src protein in association with JAK1 is not capable of further phosphorylation, either because it lacks available phosphorylation sites or is not catalytically active. While we favor the interpretation that the phosphorylation of JAK1 in these in vitro kinase assay results from the activity of JAK1 itself, we cannot rule out the possibility that part of this phosphorylation is attributable to v-Src co-precipitated with JAK1.


DISCUSSION

Our results show that the Janus kinases JAK1 and JAK2 are constitutively tyrosyl-phosphorylated in Src-transformed cells and suggest that JAK1, and possibly JAK2, is in an activated state in these cells. These findings raise the possibility that JAK1 and/or JAK2 might be at least partly responsible for the constitutive activation of Stat3 previously described (11) in Src-transformed cells. In this regard, it is interesting to note that both JAK1 and JAK2 contain putative binding sites (YXXQ motif, Ref. 15) for Stat3, while neither v-Src nor c-Src contains these sites. It is also interesting to speculate that the apparently greater activation of JAK1 compared to JAK2 might account for the observed targeting of Stat3 rather than Stat1 for activation in Src-transformed cells. While JAK2 contains a motif similar to the putative Stat1 binding site (16) in the interferon-gamma receptor, JAK1, v-Src and c-Src do not. Although both JAK1 and JAK2 have been shown to phosphorylate Stat1 when co-expressed in Sf9 cells and in in vitro kinase assays (17), JAK1 was significantly less efficient than JAK2 in phosphorylating Stat1 in vitro (see Fig. 5 in Ref. 17). Thus, under conditions of normal levels of expression of the JAK and Stat proteins, JAK1 activation alone may not be sufficient for Stat1 activation. On the other hand, when both Src and Stat3 are expressed in yeast, Src can phosphorylate Stat3 without the assistance of JAK1.2 However, these results in yeast do not preclude the possibility that JAK1 could be required for Stat3 activation by Src in mammalian cells. Further work will be required to resolve the role of JAK1 in the constitutive activation of Stat3 observed in Src-transformed cells.

These findings also raise the question of whether activation of JAK1 and Stat3 might be important in the normal function of c-Src. It has been established that one of the functions of c-Src is to participate in intracellular signaling initiated by the binding of a number of growth factors, such as PDGF, colony-stimulating factor 1, and EGF, to their cell surface receptors. Src binds directly to these activated receptors and becomes itself activated (18-21). Microinjection of either neutralizing anti-Src family kinase antibodies or a dominant-negative mutant of c-Src into cells prior to stimulation blocks PDGF, colony-stimulating factor 1, or EGF-induced entry into S-phase (22, 23), suggesting that activation of Src family kinases is necessary for these factors to induce mitogenesis. Each of these factors has been shown to promote the tyrosyl phosphorylation and DNA binding activity of proteins recognized by an antibody directed against the C-terminal portion of Stat3 (10). Activation of JAK1 has also been reported in EGF-stimulated cells. It is possible that c-Src has a role in activation of Stat3 and JAK1 by these growth factor receptors.

What role the constitutive activation of the JAKs might play in Src-dependent cell transformation is not clear. Unlike the growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases, such as the receptors for EGF and PDGF, that have been directly linked to mitogenesis, signaling through the JAK-Stat pathway(s) has been primarily associated with the maintenance, differentiation, and activation of cells of the hematopoietic and lymphocytic lineages. Yet, cellular differentiation often involves proliferation, and several lines of evidence suggest that increased activity of JAK2 may be responsible for increased proliferation of EPO-dependent hematopoietic progenitor cells. In most systems examined thus far, JAK and Stat activation is highly transient, even in the continued presence of the activating cytokine. The tight regulation of JAK-Stat signaling is thought to be accomplished through the activity of cellular phosphatases. In CHO cells expressing a mutant form of the EPO receptor that lacks the ability to bind SHP-1, EPO-induced JAK2 activation is greatly prolonged compared to that observed in 32D cells expressing the wild type EPO receptor (24). In mice bearing the mutations "Motheaten" or "Motheaten viable," the hematopoietic progenitor cells lack functional SHP-1 (25). These mice have multiple abnormalities in their hematopoietic system including an elevated population of erythroid progenitor cells. In culture, these progenitors show a greatly heightened sensitivity to EPO-induced proliferation. Patients with a mutant EPO receptor lacking the SHP-1 binding domain were also found to have elevated levels of various erythroid cells and erythroid progenitor cells with hypersensitivity to EPO (26). Taken together, these observations suggest that increased or unregulated activity of JAKs may, at least in certain contexts, contribute to aberrant cellular proliferation.

Activation of JAKs and/or Stats has been reported in other oncogenic model systems. JAK2 is constitutively activated in acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Furthermore, the JAK2 inhibitor tyrphostin AG-490 induced apoptosis in these cells, strongly suggesting that the constitutive JAK2 activity is necessary for the aberrant growth of these cells (27). Human T cell lymphotropic virus I (HTLV-I) infection of peripheral blood T cells results in a progression to interleukin (IL)-2 independent growth. Migone et al. (28) reported constitutive activation of JAKs 1 and 3 and Stats 3 and 5 that was temporally linked to the emergence of IL-2-independent growth in these cells. As these are the same JAK and Stat proteins that are activated in response to IL-2 in these cells, it is reasonable to speculate that their constitutive activation may be important for transformation by HTLV-1. Similarly, murine pre-B cells transformed by v-Abl showed constitutive formation of Stat-containing DNA binding factors and activation of JAKs 1 and 3 (29). Recent studies of a Drosophila Stat homologue, D-Stat, are also suggestive of a role for JAK-Stat pathways in cell proliferation and oncogenesis (30, 31). Interestingly, gain-of-function mutations affecting a Drosophila JAK homologue, HOP, are associated with melanotic tumors and hypertrophy of hematopoietic tissues (32, 33). Mutations in D-Stat suppress the tumorigenic phenotype of these activated HOP mutants, suggesting that JAK-Stat signaling is essential for tumor formation (30, 31). While it remains to be determined whether JAKs and Stats have causal roles in Src oncogenesis, our results are consistent with the possibility that JAK-Stat signaling pathways contribute to some facet of oncogenesis induced by Src.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DK48283 (to C. C.-S.) and CA55652 (to R. J.) and a grant from the Arthritis Foundation (to G.S.C.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§   To whom correspondence should be addressed.
1    The abbreviations used are: Stat, signal transducer and activator of transcription; JAK, Janus kinase; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; EPO, erythropoietin; EGF, epidermal growth factor; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor.
2    B. Cochran, personal communication.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. J. Ihle and B. Witthuhn for the gift of antibodies to JAK1 and JAK1 synthetic peptide. We would also like to acknowledge the helpful comments of Dr. Debra Meyer, Mary Stofega, and Dr. Lawrence Argetsinger.


REFERENCES

  1. Jove, R., Hanafusa, T., Hamaguchi, M., and Hanafusa, H. (1989) Oncogene Res. 5, 49-60 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Parsons, J. T., and Weber, M. J. (1989) Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 147, 79-127 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Bishop, J. M. (1991) Cell 64, 235-48 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Ihle, J. N. (1994) Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 206, 268-272 [Abstract]
  5. Darnell, J. E., Jr., Kerr, I. M., and Stark, G. R. (1994) Science 264, 1415-1421 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Wen, Z., Zhong, Z., and Darnell, J. E., Jr. (1995) Cell 82, 241-250 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Eilers, A., Georgellis, D., Klose, B., Schindler, C., Ziemiecki, A. H., A. G., Wilks, A. F., and Decker, T. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 3579-3586 [Abstract]
  8. Ruff-Jamison, S., Chen, K., and Cohen, S. (1993) Science 261, 1733-1736 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Silvennoinen, O., Schindler, C., Schlessinger, J., and Levy, D. E. (1993) Science 261, 1736-1739 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Raz, R., Durbin, J. E., and Levy, D. E. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 24391-24395 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Yu, C. L., Meyer, D. J., Campbell, G. S., Larner, A. C., Carter-Su, C., Schwartz, J., and Jove, R. (1995) Science 269, 81-83 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Kmiecik, T. E., and Shalloway, D. (1987) Cell 49, 65-73 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Johnson, P. J., Coussens, P. M., Danko, A. V., and Shalloway, D. (1985) Mol. Cell. Biol. 5, 1073-1083 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Campbell, G. S., Christian, L. J., and Carter-Su, C. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 7427-7434 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Stahl, N., Farruggella, T. J., Boulton, T. G., Zhong, Z., Darnell, J. E., Jr., and Yancopoulos, G. D. (1995) Science 267, 1349-1353 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Greenlund, A. C., Farrar, M. A., Viviano, B., and Schreiber, R. D. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 1591-1600 [Abstract]
  17. Quelle, F. W., Thierfelder, W., Witthuhn, B. A., Tang, B., Cohen, S., and Ihle, J. N. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 20775-20780 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Courtneidge, S. A., Dhand, R., Pilat, D., Twamley, G. M., Waterfield, M. D., and Roussel, M. F. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 943-950 [Abstract]
  19. Gould, K. L., and Hunter, T. (1988) Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 3345-3356 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Kypta, R. M., Goldberg, Y., Ulug, E. T., and Courtneidge, S. A. (1990) Cell 62, 481-492 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Luttrell, D. K., Lee, A., Lansing, T. J., Crosby, R. M., Jung, K. D., Willard, D., Luther, M., Rodriguez, M., Berman, J., and Gilmer, T. M. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 83-87 [Abstract]
  22. Twamley-Stein, G. M., Pepperkok, R., Ansorge, W., and Courtneidge, S. A. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 7696-7700 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Roche, S., Koegl, M., Barone, M. V., Roussel, M. F., and Courtneidge, S. A. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 1102-1109 [Abstract]
  24. Klingmuller, U., Lorenz, U., Cantley, L. C., Neel, B. G., and Lodish, H. F. (1995) Cell 80, 729-738 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Van Zant, G., and Shultz, L. (1989) Exp. Hematol. 17, 81-87 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. De La Chapelle, A., Traskelin, A., and Juvonen, E. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 4495-4499 [Abstract]
  27. Meydan, N., Grunberger, T., Dadi, H., Shahar, M., Arpaia, E., Lapidot, Z., Leeder, J. S., Freedman, M., Cohen, A., Gazit, A., Levitzki, A., and Roifman, C. M. (1996) Nature 379, 645-648 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Migone, T. S., Lin, J. X., Cereseto, A., Mulloy, J. C., O'Shea, J. J., Franchini, G., and Leonard, W. J. (1995) Science 269, 79-81 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Danial, N. N., Pernis, A., and Rothman, P. B. (1995) Science 269, 1875-1877 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Hou, X. S., Melnick, M. B., and Perrimon, N. (1996) Cell 84, 411-419 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Yan, R., Small, S., Desplan, C., Dearolf, C. R., and Darnell, J. E., Jr. (1996) Cell 84, 421-430 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Luo, H., Hanratty, W. P., and Dearolf, C. R. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 1412-1420 [Abstract]
  33. Harrison, D. A., Binari, R., Nahreini, T. S., Gilman, M., and Perrimon, N. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 2857-2865 [Abstract]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.