Identification and Phenotypic Analysis of Two Glyoxalase II Encoding Genes from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, GLO2 and GLO4, and Intracellular Localization of the Corresponding Proteins*

(Received for publication, April 9, 1997)

Arnold Bito Dagger , Margit Haider , Ingrid Hadler and Michael Breitenbach

From the Institute for Genetics and General Biology, University of Salzburg, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Note Added in Proof
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

We have isolated and characterized two genes coding for the glyoxalase II enzyme from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The coding region of the GLO2 gene corresponds to a protein with 274 amino acids and a molecular mass of 31,306 daltons. The open reading frame of the GLO4 gene could be translated into a protein with 285 amino acids and a molecular mass of 32,325 daltons. The amino acid sequences of the deduced proteins are 59.1% identical and show high similarities to the sequence of the human glyoxalase II. When grown on either glucose or glycerol as a carbon source, a glo2 glo4 double deletion strain contains no glyoxalase II activity at all and shows no obvious phenotype during vegetative growth. However, this strain showed a similar high sensitivity against exogenous methylglyoxal as compared with a glyoxalase I-deficient strain. Whereas the GLO2 gene is expressed on both glucose and glycerol, the GLO4 gene is only active on glycerol. The active Glo2p protein is localized in the cytoplasm and the active Glo4p in the mitochondrial matrix. Heterologous expression of the full-length GLO2 coding region in Escherichia coli resulted in an active protein. However, to get an active Glo4p protein in E. coli, the putative mitochondrial transit peptide at the N-terminal end had to be removed by shortening the 5' end of the GLO4 open reading frame.


INTRODUCTION

The glyoxalase system (for review see Ref. 1) consists of two enzymes, glyoxalase I and glyoxalase II. Using glutathione as cofactor it converts 2-oxoaldehydes into the corresponding 2-hydroxy acids. The most important substrate seems to be methylglyoxal. In most organisms, this toxic compound is formed as a by-product of glycolysis from triose phosphates through the action of triose-phosphate isomerase (2). But the main source for methylglyoxal in yeast and other microorganisms is dihydroxyacetone phosphate which is converted to methylglyoxal by the methylglyoxal synthase (3, 4). As shown in Reaction 1 (where MG, HTA, and GSH indicate methylglyoxal, hemithioacetal, and glutathione, respectively), the first step in the conversion of methylglyoxal into D-lactic acid through the glyoxalase system is the spontaneous formation of hemithioacetal from the reaction of methylglyoxal with reduced glutathione. Hemithioacetal is metabolized to S-D-lactoylglutathione (SLG)1 by glyoxalase I. Glyoxalase II catalyzes the reaction of SLG to D-lactate and GSH.
CH3    CH3 [Glo1] CH3    [Glo2] CH3   
|    |    |       |   
CO + GSH right-arrow CO  right-arrow HCOH +H2O  right-arrow HCOH +GSH
|   |   |     |  
CHO   HCOH   CO     COOH  
    |   |        
    SG   SG        
 
(MG) (HTA) (SLG) (D-LACTATE)
<UP><SC>Reaction 1</SC></UP>
The glyoxalase system is present in all organisms analyzed so far (5-7) and is thought to be ubiquitous. It is clear that the glyoxalase system can detoxify methylglyoxal and other 2-oxoaldehydes, but the exact biological role of the glyoxalase system is still unclear. It has been shown that there is some correlation of the activities of the two enzymes with proliferation and differentiation of eucaryotic cells. In several systems it has been shown that immature, proliferating cells and tissues have relatively high glyoxalase I activities and low glyoxalase II activities, whereas mature, differentiated cells have relatively low glyoxalase I activities and high glyoxalase II activities (reviewed in Refs. 1, 8, and 9). Therefore, it was presumed that in growing cells, there should be an increase of the SLG level compared with resting cells. In accordance with this, inhibitors of glyoxalase I lead to a slowing down or even complete arrest of cell growth of plant or animal cells. However, up to now there is no evidence for a causal relationship between the glyoxalase system and cell proliferation.

Recently, Inoue and Kimura (10) characterized the glyoxalase I gene, GLO1, from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Besides an enhanced sensitivity against the presence of methylglyoxal in the growth medium, they could not detect any obvious phenotype of a glo1 null mutant. Genes encoding glyoxalase I enzymes were isolated and characterized previously also from other species (11-14). However, the first glyoxalase II gene isolated recently (15) was the human glyoxalase II gene, HAGH1. It has been shown that glyoxalase II is present in the cytoplasm and the mitochondria of rat liver cells (16). It is not clear if the two isoenzymes are encoded by different genes.

Here we present the cloning and characterization of two genes from S. cerevisiae which code for functional glyoxalase II enzymes. Originally, we identified one of the genes (referred herein as GLO4) as a multicopy suppressor gene for a mutant yeast strain which has a reduced efficiency of spore germination (17). The suppressor gene showed a high homology to the human HAGH1 gene. The deduced protein showed also 59% identity to another unidentified protein predicted from an ORF (GenBank/EMBL accession no. U51030) identified in the yeast genome project. Therefore, we cloned this gene (referred herein as GLO2) and verified that both gene products are in fact glyoxalase II enzymes. The genes were functionally expressed in Escherichia coli. Several yeast deletion strains were constructed which lacked either one or both of the glyoxalase II genes and/or the glyoxalase I gene. Using these deletion strains it was possible to determine that (i) none of the three glyoxalase genes is essential for normal vegetative growth on glucose or glycerol, but all three are essential to survive as high concentrations of methylglyoxal in the growth medium as the wild type strain, (ii) the two glyoxalase II genes are expressed differentially on media containing glucose or glycerol as carbon source, and (iii) the proteins are localized in different cellular compartments.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

Oligonucleotides were custom synthesized by MWG-Biotech. Restriction enzymes were bought from Amersham Corp. and MBI Fermentas. Taq DNA polymerase was obtained from Böhringer Mannheim. For DNA sequencing the T7 DNA sequencing kit from Pharmacia Biotech Inc. was used. Radiochemicals were purchased from American Radiochemicals. Glutathione, S-D-lactoylglutathione, and other chemicals were bought from Sigma and Merck. Media components (casein hydrolysate 140, yeast extract, and yeast nitrogen base) were bought from Life Technologies, Inc. ZETA-Probe membrane was purchased from Bio-Rad. The Immobilon membrane was bought from Millipore. The Coomassie Protein Assay Reagent was bought from Pierce.

Microorganisms and Cultures

The strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table I. E. coli cells were grown in Luria broth (LB) at 37 °C. Yeast cells were grown at 28 °C on YPD complex medium (2% glucose, 2% peptone, 1% yeast extract) or on synthetic minimal medium (0.17% yeast nitrogen base, 0.5% ammonium sulfate) containing the appropriate amino acids, adenine and either 2% glucose or 3% glycerol. For the growth experiments in the presence of methylglyoxal, cells were grown up to an optical density at 600 nm (A600) of 1 in synthetic minimal medium as above. 4 ml of fresh medium (in 15 ml tubes) containing various concentrations of methylglyoxal (0, 2, 4, 6, or 8 mM) were inoculated with these cells to an initial A600 between 0.05 and 0.08. The A600 was measured every 5 h over a period of 25 h.

Table I. Strains and plasmids used in this study


Genotype Ref. or source

Yeast strainsa
  W303 MATa/alpha can1-100/can1-100 ura3-1/ura3-1 ade2-1/ade2-1 leu2-3/leu2-3 his3-11/+ trp1-1/+ J. Segall
  W303 AH MATa can1-100 ura3-1 ade2-1 leu2-3 trp1-1 J. Segall
  W303 BT MATalpha can1-100 ura3-1 ade2-1 leu2-3 his3-11 J. Segall
  W303e Isogenic of W303 except for his3-11/his3-11 trp1-1/trp1-1 S. Oliver
  W303e a Isogenic of W303 AH except for his3-11 S. Oliver
  W303e alpha Isogenic of W303 BT except for trp1-1 S. Oliver
  W3G1 Isogenic of W303e, except for Delta glo1::KanR/Delta glo1::KanR This study
  W3G2 Isogenic of W303e, except for Delta glo2::URA3/Delta glo2::URA3 This study
  W3G4 Isogenic of W303, except for Delta glo4::URA3/Delta glo4::URA3 This study
  W3G12 Isogenic of W303e, except for Delta glo1::KanR/Delta glo1::KanR Delta glo2::URA3/Delta glo2::URA3 This study
  W3G14 Isogenic of W303e, except for Delta glo1::KanR/Delta glo1::KanR Delta glo4::URA3/Delta glo4::URA3 This study
  W3G24 MATa/alpha can1-100/can1-100 ura3-1/ura3-1 ade2-1/ade2-1 leu2-3/leu2-3 his3/his3 trp1-1/+ Delta glo2::URA3/Delta glo2::URA3 Delta glo4::URA3/Delta glo4::URA3 This study
  W3G124 MATa/alpha can1-100/can1-100 ura3-1/ura3-1 ade2-1/ade2-1 leu2-3/leu2-3 his3/his3 trp1-1/+ Delta glo1::KanR/Delta glo1::KanR Delta glo2::URA3/Delta glo2::URA3 Delta glo4::URA3/Delta glo4::URA3 This study
E. coli strain
  BL21(DE3) F-, ompT, r-Bm-B 36
Plasmids
  pUC18 AmpR 45
    pUCG4 pUC18 + GLO4 This study
    pUCG4Delta pUC18 + Delta glo4::URA3 This study
    pKanMX4 AmpR, KanMX4 module 25
  pMW172 T7 expression cassette, AmpR 22
    pGlo2-Ec2 pMW172 + GLO2 ORF This study
    pGlo4-Ec2 pMW172 + GLO4 ORF This study
    pGlo4-Ec3 pMW172 + GLO4 (without 10 codons at 5' end) This study
  pYES2 URA3, AmpR, PGAL1 expression cassette Invitrogen
    pGlo2g5 pYES2 + GLO2 ORF, URA3 exchanged with LEU2 This study
    pGlo4g5 pYES2 + GLO4 ORF, URA3 exchanged with LEU2 This study
  YEp351 URA3, AmpR 21
    pE351G1 YEp351 + GLO1 This study
    pE351G2 YEp351 + GLO2 This study
    pE351G1Delta YEp351 + Delta glo1::KanR This study
    pE351G2Delta YEp351 + Delta glo2::URA3 This study
  YEp13 LEU2, AmpR 34
    pE13G4 YEp13 + 2.1-kilobase insert with GLO4 and SNR9 17

a The haploid glyoxalase deletion strains are not shown.

Amplification of DNA by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

DNA was amplified by PCR (18) using the Taq DNA polymerase. 100 ng of chromosomal yeast DNA or 2 ng of plasmid DNA was used in 100-µl reaction mixtures containing 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 0.2 mM dNTP, and 0.5 µM 5' and 3' primers. 3 units of Taq DNA polymerase were added. The mixture was overlaid with 50 µl of mineral oil. After an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 5 min, 30 cycles of amplification of chromosomal DNA or 15 cycles of amplification of plasmid DNA followed. Each cycle consisted of 1 min of DNA denaturation at 94 °C, 1 min of primer annealing at 48-54 °C (depending on the primers used), and 1 to 2 min of DNA synthesis (depending on the length of the amplified DNA).

DNA Cloning and DNA Sequencing

DNA cloning and plasmid constructions were done as described by Sambrook et al. (19). DNA was sequenced manually by the chain termination method (20). For the sequencing of the GLO2 gene and GLO4 gene, vector primers, cloning primers (see below), and different sequencing primers (not shown) were used.

Construction of pE351G2

The GLO2 gene was PCR-amplified by using the Glo2-5'Eco (5'-CCAGAATTCTCCGGACTAATGTCAAACGA-3') and the Glo2-3'Bam (5'-CCAGGATCCATTGCTTTATTTCTAC-3') primers, digested with EcoRI and HindIII, and cloned into the yeast vector YEp351 (21).

Construction of pE351G1

The GLO1 gene was PCR-amplified by using the Glo1-5'BglI (5'-CCGAGATCTAAAGCTTTTTCAATGGGGATC-3') and the Glo1-3'Bgl (5'-TGTGAGATCTAAGCTTGAACGCAT-3') primers. The product (~2100 bp) was cleaved with BglII and cloned into the BamHI site of YEp351 vector.

Construction of pGlo2-Ec2

The GLO2 open reading frame was amplified by using the Glo2-5'Nde (5'-GGAATTCCATATGCAGGTTAAATCGATTAA-3') and Glo2-3'Bam primers. The PCR product was digested with NdeI and SspI and cloned into the E. coli expression plasmid pMW172 (22) which was digested with NdeI and StuI before.

Construction of pGlo4-Ec2

The GLO4 ORF was PCR-amplified by using the Glo4-5'Nde (5'-CTGGCCCATATGAAGTTTTTACTGCAGCAA-3') and the Glo4-3'Bam (5'-CCAGGATCCACATCCGTCGTC-3') primers. The PCR product was digested with NdeI (partial digestion) and EcoRV and cloned into pMW172 which was digested with NdeI and StuI before. The pGlo4-Ec3 was constructed in the same way as pGlo4-Ec2, but instead of the Glo4-Nde primer the Glo4-Nde2 primer (5'-TAAGACATATGCATGTTAAGCCTATAA-3') was used in the PCR.

For the cloning of the glyoxalase II ORFs under the control of the GAL1 promoter (23) the glyoxalase II ORFs were cut out from the E. coli expression plasmids pGlo2-Ec2 and pGlo4-Ec2 by the restriction enzyme XbaI, respectively. The XbaI ends were partially filled in by Klenow polymerase. The fragment was cloned behind the GAL1 promoter of the yeast expression vector pYES2 which had been cut by HindIII, and the resulting ends were partially filled in with Klenow polymerase. From the resulting plasmids, pGlo2g1 and pGlo4g1, the URA3 gene was cut out with StuI and replaced by the LEU2 gene which was cut out from plasmid YEp351 with HpaI and PvuII. The resulting plasmids are pGlo2g5 and pGlo4g5.

Deletion of the Glyoxalase Genes in Yeast

Haploid strains with deletions of the glyoxalase genes were generated by the one-step gene replacement method (24). The deleted regions of the genes are shown in Fig. 5. For the construction of the GLO2 deletion cassette, the GLO2 ORF was cut out from plasmid pE351G2 with the restriction enzymes ClaI and SacI, blunt-ended by Klenow polymerase, and replaced by the URA3 gene, resulting in plasmid pE351G2Delta . This plasmid was digested with BspEI and XhoI. The fragment containing the GLO2 deletion cassette was purified by agarose gel electrophoresis and used for the transformation of yeast strain W303e. For the deletion of the GLO4 gene from strain W303, the GLO4 deletion cassette was constructed by cloning the GLO4 gene from plasmid pE13G4 into plasmid pUC18 using the KpnI and BamHI sites. From the resulting plasmid, pUCG4, the GLO4 ORF ranging from the PstI to the HindIII site was replaced by the URA3 gene, resulting in plasmid pUCG4Delta . The SfuI-BamHI fragment was used as the GLO4 deletion cassette. For the deletion of the GLO1 gene in the strain W303e, the plasmid pE351G1Delta was constructed as follows. The plasmid pE351G1 was cut with BamHI. The fragment that lacked the GLO1 ORF and part of the GLO1 promoter was ligated with the KanMX4 module which had been taken from plasmid pKanMX4 (25). The SalI-PmlI fragment was used as the GLO1 deletion cassette. All deletions were shown to be correct by PCR and Southern blotting using genomic DNA from the respective deletion strains (see below). Haploid and the corresponding diploid strains missing two or all three glyoxalase genes were generated by crossing.


Fig. 5. Physical map of GLO1 (A), GLO2 (B), and GLO4 (C) genomic regions and the corresponding deletions. Filled arrows indicate length and direction of coding regions; white arrows indicate ORFs of unknown function; black bars indicate probes used for Southern hybridization.
[View Larger Version of this Image (27K GIF file)]

Genomic Southern Analysis

Genomic DNA from the yeast strains with different deletions of glyoxalase genes was digested with SspI in the case of the glo2 and glo4 deletion loci or with HindIII for the glo1 deletion locus, respectively, and blotted onto ZETA probe membrane by alkaline capillary transfer (26). The blots were hybridized with different probes for the glyoxalase genes. These probes were labeled with [alpha -32P]dATP by random priming (27) using the Kit from Böhringer Mannheim. As probes, the following restriction fragments were used (see Fig. 5): the ClaI-EcoRI fragment of the GLO2 gene, the SfuI-DraI fragment of the GLO4 gene, and the HindIII-NdeI fragment of the GLO1 gene, respectively. The wild type GLO2 locus and the wild type GLO4 showed 1100-bp bands, respectively, whereas 1500-bp bands were characteristic for the deletion loci in both cases. The wild type GLO1 locus is characterized by a 1100-bp fragment, and the corresponding deletion locus shows a 700-bp band.

Heterologous Expression of the Glyoxalase II Proteins in E. coli and Preparation of Cell Lysates

10-ml cultures (grown in LB) were induced at an A600 of 0.2-0.4 with 0.2 mM isopropyl-beta -D-thiogalactoside and grown for a further 3 h at 37 °C. The bacteria were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM dithiothreitol. The cells were lysed by several freeze-thaw cycles. The cell lysates were centrifuged at 4 °C for 30 min at 60,000 × g to remove cell debris. The total protein concentration was determined by the method described by Bradford (28). Total protein extracts were prepared by resuspension of pelleted cells in SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis sample buffer containing 2% SDS and boiling for 5 min. Electrophoretic separation of protein extracts on the SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was done as described (29).

Preparation of the Cytoplasmic and Mitochondrial Fractions of Yeast Cells

For the isolation of the cytoplasmic and mitochondrial compartments, yeast strains were cultured in 400 ml of minimal synthetic medium containing the appropriate amino acids in 5-liter Erlenmeyer flasks. For the growth of deletion strains W3G2 and W3G4, the growth medium contained 3% glycerol instead of glucose, and the cells were harvested by centrifugation at an A600 of 1 to 1.5. The strains W3G24/pGlo2g5 and W3G24/pGlo4g5 were grown in a medium containing 5% glycerol and 0.1% glucose up to an A600 of 0.5. For the induction of the GAL1 promoter 2% galactose was added to the medium, and the strains were grown for further 6 h before the cells were harvested. The cytoplasmic and the mitochondrial compartments of the cells were prepared by differential centrifugation (30, 31). Further subfractionation of the mitochondria was done as described (30).

Determination of the Glyoxalase I and Glyoxalase II Activity and Preparation of Yeast Cell Extracts

For the determination of the specific activity of glyoxalase II of exponentially growing yeast cells, the cultures were grown up to an A600 of 1 to 1.5. The cells were harvested by centrifugation, washed once in water, and pelleted again. The cells were resuspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM dithiothreitol and disrupted by vortexing with glass beads. To remove cellular debris and macromolecular structures, the cell homogenates were centrifuged at 30,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were used as cell extracts. The total protein concentration was determined by the method described by Bradford (28).

Glyoxalase I and glyoxalase II activity was measured as described (32, 33). One unit of glyoxalase II is defined as the amount of enzyme catalyzing the hydrolysis of 1 µmol of S-D-lactoylglutathione (SLG) in 1 min at 37 °C under the assay conditions (300 µM SLG, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5). The SLG hydrolysis was followed spectrophotometrically at 240 nm (Delta epsilon  = 3.1 mM-1 cm-1). For the determination of the glyoxalase II activity (given in units glyoxalase II per mg total protein) different amounts of extracts were used to measure the same decrease of SLG of approximately 10% of the total SLG content in the assay reaction.


RESULTS

Molecular Cloning and Sequence Determination of the Glyoxalase II Genes

Originally we identified the gene which we propose to name GLO42 as a multicopy suppressor for a spore germination defect of a mutant yeast strain (17). The mutant strain was transformed with a genomic yeast library constructed in the BamHI site of plasmid YEp13 (34). The insert of a complementing plasmid (pE13G4) was sequenced. The sequence (Fig. 1) contained the SNR9 gene coding for the small nuclear RNA 9, the 3' end of the CKB2 gene coding for the beta ' subunit of casein kinase 2, and one complete unknown open reading frame. For a long time, no significant homology of the deduced protein sequence to any protein of known function could be found in the sequence data bases, and we had no indication of the protein function. At the beginning of 1996 the structural gene for the human glyoxalase II (15), HAGH1, was characterized (GenBankTM/EMBL accession no. X90999). The deduced amino acid sequence of the suppressor gene ORF showed 34% amino acid identity to the sequence of the human glyoxalase II protein. Furthermore, in April, 1996, the yeast genome sequencing project was finished, and the DNA sequence determined by us revealed 100% identity to a region on chromosome XV (EMBL accession no. Z74948 and X87331). Previously, we had also mapped the GLO4 gene to chromosome XV by chromosomal Southern blotting (35). The predicted Glo4 protein has a length of 285 amino acids and the calculated molecular mass is 32,325 Da.


Fig. 1. Nucleotide sequence and deduced amino acid sequence of the GLO4 gene from S. cerevisiae. A sequence with homology to the TATA box consensus is underlined. The sequences of the PCR primers used for the cloning of the GLO4 ORF in the E. coli expression vector are marked by arrows; dashes indicate additional nucleotides for the cloning sites at the 5' ends of the primers. The sites used for the cloning of the sequence (Sau3AI and EcoRV) are shown. A possible recognition motif for the mitochondrial matrix protease is indicated by a dotted line. The last 88 codons of the CKB2 ORF are shown in italics. The sequence constituting the SNR9 small nuclear RNA is given in bold letters.
[View Larger Version of this Image (62K GIF file)]

The yeast genome sequence also contains a second ORF on yeast chromosome IV (GenBank/EMBL accession no. U51030) which is homologous to the human glyoxalase; the deduced amino acid sequence has 59.1% identity to our putative yeast glyoxalase II, and 41.2% identity to the human glyoxalase II sequence. Therefore, we amplified by PCR a genomic fragment encompassing this second hypothetical glyoxalase II gene and 300 bp upstream and 240 bp downstream of the ORF. We propose to name this gene GLO2.2 At the 5' end, the upstream primer contained EcoRI and BspEI restriction sites, and the downstream primer contained a BamHI site at the 5' ends. The PCR product showed the predicted length of 1430 bp. It was digested with EcoRI and BamHI and cloned into YEp351 vector (21) resulting in plasmid pE351G2. The DNA sequence determined (Fig. 2) was 100% identical to that found in the data base. The GLO2 open reading frame could code for a protein of 274 amino acids and the calculated molecular mass is 31,306 Da.


Fig. 2. Nucleotide sequence and deduced amino acid sequence of the GLO2 gene from S. cerevisiae. Two sequences with homology to the TATA box consensus are underlined. The sequences of the PCR primers used for the cloning of the complete sequence in the yeast vector and for the cloning of the GLO2 ORF in the E. coli vector are marked by arrows; dashes indicate additional nucleotides for the cloning sites at the 5' end of the primers. The SspI site used for the cloning of the ORF in E. coli is indicated. At the beginning of the sequence there is the end of another ORF (with homology to a copper transporting ATPase) which is shown in italics.
[View Larger Version of this Image (44K GIF file)]

To verify that the two yeast genes are glyoxalase II genes, the yeast strain W303e was transformed either with the plasmid pE13G4 or pE351G2. Transformants were grown in synthetic medium without leucine for plasmid selection and assayed for glyoxalase II activity. In these experiments glucose was the sole carbon source. The strain harboring the GLO2 gene in high copy number showed an approximately 10 times higher glyoxalase II activity than the untransformed wild type strain. The strain harboring the GLO4 gene in high copy number showed no significant increase in glyoxalase II activity (not shown, similar experiments are described below). So we had the first indication that the GLO2 gene encodes a glyoxalase II protein. On the other hand we had no such indication for the GLO4 gene.

Amino Acid Sequence Comparison of Glyoxalase II Proteins

In the GenBank/EMBL data base we found 16 further proteins predicted from open reading frames that are homologous to the two yeast and the human glyoxalase II proteins. The length of the predicted proteins lies between 206 (the protein from Methanococcus jannaschii) and 285 amino acids (Glo4p from yeast). The alignment of all these sequences (Fig. 3) reveals six regions (box I to VI) that are highly conserved and are distributed over nearly the whole length of the protein.


Fig. 3.

Sequence alignment of the glyoxalase II proteins and homologous ORFs from different organisms. The sequences were aligned by the GCG program. The upper five sequences and the sequence of Arabidopsis thaliana are from eucaryotic organisms; the two lower sequences are from archaebacteria; the other sequences are of eubacterial origin. Only the upper three sequences (Glo4p, Glo2p, from yeast and the human Hagh1p) represent glyoxalase II proteins that are identified and characterized so far. The other sequences are deduced from unidentified ORFs in the data base. At the end of each sequence the length of the polypeptide and the GenBank/EMBL accession number (in parentheses) are given. Amino acid residues that are identical or similar to the consensus sequence are shown in uppercase letters. Six regions (numbers I to VI) of high similarity are indicated by shaded boxes. In the consensus line, the residues that are identical or similar in 12 or more (out of 19) sequences are given in lowercase letters; totally conserved residues or 18/19 matches (R/K or D/E substitutions were considered as identities) are shown in uppercase letters; those amino acids that are present in 18 or all sequences and that could be involved in the binding and/or processing of the substrate (H, R/K, D/E) are underlined.


[View Larger Version of this Image (86K GIF file)]

Cloning and Heterologous Expression of the Yeast Glyoxalase II ORFs in E. coli

To verify that both yeast ORFs are coding for glyoxalase II enzymes, the complete ORFs from both genes were amplified by PCR and cloned between the NdeI and the StuI sites of E. coli vector pMW172 (22). The inserts of the resulting plasmids, pGlo2-Ec2 and pGlo4-Ec2, were sequenced and found to be correct. The plasmids were transformed into the E. coli strain BL21(DE3) that allows the expression of the plasmid inserts after induction with isopropyl-beta -D-thiogalactoside (36). In total protein extracts of both transformant strains additional proteins compared with the strain transformed with pMW172 vector without an insert are clearly visible on the SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Fig. 4). The apparent molecular weight of the induced protein of the GLO2-transformed strain seems to be about 3-5 kDa higher than expected. The GLO4-transformed strain shows also a strongly induced band in the expected molecular mass range (32 kDa). However, only a poor amount of the induced Glo4p can be found in the soluble fraction.


Fig. 4. Heterologous expression of the yeast glyoxalase II genes in E. coli. E. coli strain BL21(DE3) was transformed with the plasmids indicated below. The transformants were cultured in 10 ml of LB medium and induced for glyoxalase II gene expression. The 60,000 × g supernatant (7 µg of protein amount) of lysed cells (lanes 1-5) prepared by several freeze-thaw cycles and the total protein extracts (lanes 6-10) prepared by boiling whole cell pellets in SDS-containing sample buffer were electrophoresed under reducing conditions on a gradient (8-28%) polyacrylamide gel. The separated proteins were visualized by staining with Coomassie Blue. Lane M, molecular mass markers; lanes 1 and 6, pMW172; lanes 2 and 7, pGlo2-Ec2; lanes 3 and 8, pGlo4-Ec3; lanes 4, 5, 9, and 10, pGlo4-Ec2 (two different transformants). Arrows indicate the position of induced glyoxalase II proteins. The molecular mass of the marker proteins is given in kDa.
[View Larger Version of this Image (106K GIF file)]

The protein extracts of the GLO2-transformed strain showed the high activity of glyoxalase II of 168.6 units/mg total protein (Table II). On the other hand, there was no glyoxalase II activity measurable in the soluble fraction from the GLO4 transformant strain. Also the strain transformed with the plasmid without an insert had no glyoxalase II activity. This is in accordance with previous observations (37) that glyoxalase II is not expressed when E. coli cells are grown on some media. Therefore, either the GLO4 ORF does not code for a functional glyoxalase II or the protein has to be activated by some post-translational modification.

Table II. Glyoxalase II activity of the soluble fraction from recombinant E. coli strains transformed with expression plasmids containing different yeast glyoxalase II ORFs


Strain/plasmid Glyoxalase II activity ± S.D.a

units/mg protein
BL21(DE3)/pMW172 0  ± 0.01
BL21(DE3)/pGlo2-Ec2 168.60  ± 2.26
BL21(DE3)/pGlo4-Ec2 0  ± 0.00
BL21(DE3)/pGlo4-Ec3 55.70  ± 8.46

a Activities are the mean values of three or six independent experiments.

In the sequence alignment of the putative glyoxalase II proteins (Fig. 3), it is obvious that the Glo4 protein has an N-terminal extension of at least 10 amino acids as compared with the other sequences. To find out whether the protein could be activated by deletion of this N-terminal extension, we constructed the expression plasmid pGlo4-Ec3 which is identical to the E. coli expression plasmid pGlo4-Ec2 but missing the coding sequence for the 10 N-terminal amino acids of the Glo4p. The plasmid was transformed into the BL21(DE3) strain, and the transformants were assayed for glyoxalase II activity. A high amount of the truncated Glo4p was found in the soluble fraction and a high glyoxalase II activity determined (55.7 units/mg, Table II). Therefore, it can be concluded that the GLO4 gene encodes a functional glyoxalase II enzyme that is activated only after the N-terminal extension is cleaved.

Deletion of the Glyoxalase I and Glyoxalase II Genes and Their Overexpression in S. cerevisiae

To further verify that the GLO2 and GLO4 genes are the only glyoxalase II genes in yeast and to determine a phenotype of yeast strains missing one or the other glyoxalase II gene or the whole glyoxalase system, the GLO4 and the GLO2 gene were deleted in the strains W303 and W303e, respectively. As shown in Fig. 5, almost the complete coding regions of the glyoxalase II genes were deleted by replacement with the URA3 gene leading to strains W3G2 (Delta glo2) and W3G4 (Delta glo4). The glyoxalase I gene GLO1 from S. cerevisiae (10) was deleted by replacement of more than 95% of the coding region and part of the promoter with the yeast expression cassette Kan-MX4 (25) coding for geneticin G418 resistance. The resulting strain is W3G1 (Delta glo1). The double deletion strains W3G12 (Delta glo1 Delta glo2), W3G14 (Delta glo1 Delta glo4), and W3G24 (Delta glo2 Delta glo4) and the triple deletion strain W3G124 (Delta glo1 Delta glo2 Delta glo4) were generated by crossing the haploid deletion mutants (see Table I for a summary of all strains). The deletions were confirmed by PCR and Southern blotting (not shown).

All strains showed normal growth on glucose- or glycerol-containing media. Next, the homozygous diploid deletion strains and the corresponding wild type strain W303e were grown on glucose or glycerol and tested for their glyoxalase II and/or glyoxalase I activity. The results are shown in Table III. All strains missing the GLO1 gene lacked any glyoxalase I activity (not shown) in accordance with the data presented recently by Inoue and Kimura (10). The glo2 deletion strain (W3G2) had no glyoxalase II activity when grown on glucose but showed approximately 32% activity on glycerol compared with the wild type activity. This activity is due to the GLO4 gene because the glo2 glo4 double deletion strain (W3G24) had no glyoxalase II activity at all when grown on either glucose or glycerol. Both GLO2 and GLO4 code for glyoxalase II enzymes active in vivo. From these data it seems very likely that there are no other glyoxalase II genes in yeast besides GLO2 and GLO4. The data were confirmed by the results obtained with transformants of the double mutant strain W3G24 harboring either the GLO2 multicopy plasmid pE351G2 or the GLO4 multicopy plasmid pE13G4. The strain containing multiple copies of the GLO2 gene shows an approximately 7-fold higher glyoxalase II activity than the wild type strain on both carbon sources. The double deletion strain transformed with the GLO4 multicopy plasmid, pE13G4, when grown on glycerol has a 5-fold higher glyoxalase II activity as compared with the glo2 deletion (= single copy GLO4) strain, W3G2. The same strain grown on glucose displays a small residual glyoxalase II activity of 22% compared with the activity present in the wild type. Our interpretation of this finding is that while a chromosomal single copy of GLO4 (W3G2) is completely repressed on glucose, a partial derepression occurs if the gene is present on an episomal multicopy plasmid.

Table III. Glyoxalase II activity of GLO2 and/or GLO4 deletion strains and the double deletion strain transformed with multicopy plasmids containing the GLO2 or GLO4 gene during growth on glucose or glycerol


Strain/plasmid Glyoxalase II activity ± S.D.a Growth on
Glucose Glycerol

units/mg total protein
W303e 0.237  ± 0.077 (1) 0.259  ± 0.047 (1)
W3G4 0.137  ± 0.024 (0.58) 0.198  ± 0.062 (0.76)
W3G2 0  ± 0.004 (0) 0.083  ± 0.034 (0.32)
W3G24 0  ± 0.003 (0) 0  ± 0.026 (0)
W3G24/pE13G4 0.051  ± 0.005 (0.22) 0.418  ± 0.053 (1.61)
W3G24/pE351G2 1.605  ± 0.057 (6.77) 1.797  ± 0.027 (6.94)

a Activities are the mean values of three or six independent experiments.

Effect of the Copy Number of GLO2 and GLO4 on Growth in Methylglyoxal-containing Medium

Sensitivity to methylglyoxal was tested in the homozygous diploid deletion strains and the strains overexpressing the two glyoxalase II genes and compared with the wild type strain (Fig. 6). The growth rates of all strains decreased with increasing methylglyoxal concentrations in the growth medium. The growth of the wild type strain was completely inhibited at 8 mM methylglyoxal on glucose and at 6 mM methylglyoxal on glycerol. The single mutant strains were sensitive against lower methylglyoxal concentrations. The minimal growth inhibitory concentration was 6 mM methylglyoxal for the glo4 deletion strain on both carbon sources. The growth of the glo2 deletion strain was totally inhibited at 4 mM methylglyoxal on glucose and at 6 mM on glycerol. The minimal inhibitory concentration of the glo2 glo4 double mutant strain was 2 mM methylglyoxal on glucose and at 4 mM on glycerol. All strains lacking the GLO1 gene were inhibited at 2 mM methylglyoxal on both carbon sources (only the glo1 deletion strain, W3G1, is shown). The glo2 glo4 double deletion strains harboring either the GLO2 or the GLO4 multicopy plasmid showed only poor growth in the presence of 4 mM methylglyoxal on both carbon sources and were therefore not able to reach wild type resistance against methylglyoxal. A more detailed interpretation of the results is given under "Discussion."


Fig. 6. Effect of glyoxalase gene dosage on growth in media containing methylglyoxal. Different strains were cultured in test tubes containing 4 ml of minimal synthetic medium with the appropriate amino acids, 2% glucose or 3% glycerol, and various concentrations of methylglyoxal (black-square, 0 mM; square , 2 mM; bullet , 4 mM; open circle , 6 mM; black-triangle, 8 mM). For strains W3G24/pE351G2 and W3G24/pE13G4 synthetic medium without leucine was used. Optical density (OD600) was measured every 5 h over a period of 25 h. Gene dosage of each strain is indicated in the upper part of the figure; +, single copy chromosomal gene; -, gene deleted; ++, multicopy episomal gene.
[View Larger Version of this Image (38K GIF file)]

Intracellular Localization of the Glyoxalase II Proteins

Active Glo4p could be possibly localized in the mitochondria because (i) heterologous GLO4 expression in E. coli showed that the protein has an N-terminal extension which must be removed to get an active enzyme, (ii) the GLO4 expression in yeast is induced on a carbon source (glycerol) which can support growth only in the presence of active mitochondria, and (iii) the PSORT program3 which uses the algorithm of Nakai and Kanehisa (38) predicts equal probabilities for the localization of the Glo4p in the cytoplasm and in the mitochondria, whereas the Glo2p is predicted to be present mainly in the cytoplasm. The possible cleavage site for the mitochondrial targeting sequence is at position 21 (see Fig. 1).

To find out if the two glyoxalase II proteins are in fact localized in different cellular compartments, we isolated the cytoplasmic and mitochondrial fractions from the two deletion strains, W3G2 and W3G4, which were grown in 400 ml of glycerol-containing synthetic media. Whereas the Glo2p showed a 11.5 times higher activity in the cytoplasm than in the mitochondria, the Glo4p activity was found to be 15.0 times higher in the mitochondria compared with the cytoplasm (Table IV). However, the total amount of the glyoxalase II activity of the W3G2 strain in these experiments was relatively low as compared with the experiment with the small scale cultures (Table III), maybe as a result of the poorer aeration in the medium scale cultures. Therefore, we decided to clone the GLO2 and GLO4 genes under the control of the GAL1 promoter (23) to get a higher enzyme activity. The complete ORFs of the genes were cloned behind the GAL1 promoter into the multicopy plasmid pYES2. From the resulting plasmids the URA3 gene was replaced by the LEU2 gene because the URA3 gene was already used as a marker gene for the glo2 and the glo4 deletions. The resulting plasmids, pGlo2g5 and pGlo4g5, were introduced into the double deletion strain W3G24. The transformant strains, W3G24/pGlo2g5 and W3G24/pGlo4g5, were induced for glyoxalase II expression by galactose addition to exponential growth cultures, the cytoplasmic and mitochondrial fractions were isolated, and the corresponding glyoxalase II activities were determined (Table IV). In both cases, the expression of the genes from the GAL1 promoter was much higher as compared with the expression from the cognate promoters and the localization determined previously was confirmed (Table IV). The Glo2p activity was found to be 44.7 times higher in the cytoplasm than in the mitochondria, and the Glo4p protein activity was 34.0 times higher in the mitochondria compared with the activity found in the cytoplasm. The cytoplasmic and mitochondrial fractions were characterized by Western blotting with antibodies directed to citrate synthase (mitochondrial localized) and hexokinase (cytoplasmically localized), respectively (not shown). For the cytoplasmic fraction a small contamination with the mitochondrial fraction could be detected. The reason seems to be lysis of mitochondria during the preparation of the cytoplasmic fraction which we could not prevent completely.

Table IV. Activity of the two glyoxalase II proteins in cytoplasm and mitochondria


Protein Strain tested Glyoxalase II activity ± S.D.a
Ratio
Mitochondria Cytoplasm Mit/Cytb Cyt/Mit

units/mg
Glo2p W3G4 0.016  ± 0.011 0.184  ± 0.014 11.5
W3G24/pGlo2g5 0.092  ± 0.009 4.108  ± 1.080 44.7
Glo4p W3G2 0.060  ± 0.014 0.004  ± 0.004 15.0
W3G24/pGlo4g5 23.871  ± 6.357 0.703  ± 0.655 34.0

a Activities are the mean values of six separate measurements.
b Mit/Cyt, mitochondria and cytoplasm, respectively.

Further subfractionation of the mitochondrial fraction from the strain W3G24/pGlo4g5 revealed a 6.7-fold higher glyoxalase II activity in the matrix fraction compared with the intermembrane space fraction. The respective activities are 38.44 units/mg for the matrix fraction and 5.75 units/mg for the intermembrane space fraction (not shown). Again, we cannot exclude a small contamination of the intermembrane fraction with the matrix fraction.


DISCUSSION

In the present paper, we have shown that in S. cerevisiae glyoxalase II is encoded by two nuclear genes, which we propose to name GLO2 and GLO4. The GLO2 gene (yeast ORF number YDR272w) is located on chromosome IV near GCN2. The molecular mass of the Glo2 protein calculated from the deduced amino acid sequence is 31,306 Da. The GLO4 gene (yeast ORF number YOR040w) is located on chromosome XV adjacent to CKB2. The molecular mass of the Glo4 protein calculated from the deduced amino acid sequence is 32,325 Da. The heterologous overexpression of the complete GLO2 ORF or of a truncated GLO4 ORF in E. coli leads to high glyoxalase II activities, which is not detectable in E. coli strains transformed with the expression plasmid without an insert. Overexpression on multicopy plasmids in yeast leads to severalfold higher glyoxalase II activities as compared with the untransformed strain. A double deletion yeast strain missing both genes has no glyoxalase II activity at all. The yeast genome doesn't contain another ORF with significant homology to GLO2 and GLO4. We conclude that the two genes, GLO2 and GLO4, are the only glyoxalase II encoding genes in yeast.

Single, double, or triple (with glo1 deletion) deletion strains were generated and tested for (i) enzyme activity, (ii) growth properties, and (iii) resistance to exogenous methylglyoxal. These experiments were performed on both glucose and glycerol as sole carbon sources. The results show that glyoxalase II, as well as the whole glyoxalase system, is not essential for growth on either carbon source (Fig. 6). Measurements of enzyme activity show that GLO2 is expressed on both carbon sources, whereas GLO4 is expressed exclusively on glycerol. However, the total glyoxalase II activity is increased only slightly on glycerol which is in contrast to the 20-fold increase of the glyoxalase I activity on this carbon source (39).

Localization studies of the glyoxalase II isoenzymes using different deletion strains and the overexpression of the two genes from the GAL1 promoter revealed that the enzymatically active Glo2 protein is located in the cytoplasm, and the enzymatically active Glo4p is located in the mitochondrial matrix. This is in accordance with the finding that the GLO4 expression is induced on glycerol. Utilization of glycerol for growth is possible only in cells with functionally active mitochondria. The N-terminal end of the Glo4p shows the characteristics of a mitochondrial targeting sequence (40), namely a complete lack of negative charges and the presence of several positive charges, particularly arginine residues. The program PSORT predicts a possible cleavage site for the matrix protease at sequence position 21. However, the full-length polypeptide expressed in E. coli is hardly soluble and enzymatically inactive, whereas an N-terminal truncated polypeptide lacking the first 10 amino acids is soluble and enzymatically active. Taken together, the observations strongly indicate that Glo4p is indeed located in the mitochondrial matrix and an N-terminal targeting sequence must be cleaved off to produce an active enzyme. Also for rat liver it has been shown (16) that glyoxalase II is present in the cytoplasm and the mitochondria. It is not known whether the mammalian isoenzymes are encoded by different genes. But what is the significance of a mitochondrial glyoxalase II? We could not detect any glyoxalase I activity in mitochondria (not shown). As a result, there should be no S-D-lactoylglutathione as substrate in this compartment for the glyoxalase II enzyme and therefore no demand for the enzyme in mitochondria. Maybe the Glo4p accepts other thiol esters of glutathione that are formed spontaneously or by other enzymes in the mitochondria (16).

Although we could not detect a phenotype of the strains deficient for one, two, or three glyoxalase enzymes in normal vegetative growth on standard media, the growth of these strains was inhibited on media containing different amounts of methylglyoxal. When grown on glucose, strains deficient for glyoxalase I or deficient for both glyoxalase II enzymes are extremely sensitive to exogenous methylglyoxal. However, during growth on glycerol the presence of the glyoxalase I gene alone results in some resistance, presumably because of the enhanced expression of GLO1 on this carbon source. The implication of this finding is discussed below. Our experiments with growth inhibition of single deletion strains show that both the cytoplasmic (Glo2p) and the mitochondrial (Glo4p) enzyme must be present to achieve optimal protection from exogenous methylglyoxal (Fig. 6). Even the higher total amount of active glyoxalase II of the strains with multiple episomal copies of one glyoxalase II gene as compared with the wild type does not compensate for a complete lack of the other isoenzyme. Therefore, in yeast all three proteins involved in the glyoxalase system are needed for the detoxification of exogenous methylglyoxal in vivo. However, up to now the biological significance of the resistance to exogenous methylglyoxal is not known.

The amino acid sequences of Glo2p and the Glo4p of yeast are 59.1% identical to each other and 41.2 and 34.2% identical to the human glyoxalase II sequence (15), respectively. Searching the protein sequence data bases for protein homologues to Glo2p, Glo4p, and the human Hagh1p revealed 16 additional homologous proteins of yet unknown function (Fig. 3). Protein sequences from widely divergent organisms are represented (archaebacteria, eubacteria, fungi, plants, and animal), and most of them were found by systematic sequencing of the respective genomes. Six regions of significant high similarity (boxes I-VI) could be involved in the function of the proteins. These regions are distributed along the total protein and taken together comprise more than 20% of the total protein length. There is one sequence from M. jannaschii that lacks box 6. Interestingly, beside yeast there are three other organisms represented up to now, E. coli, Haemophilus influenzae, and Synechocystis sp. (all eubacteria) with two homologous proteins. But in contrast to yeast, the protein sequences of each pair of the procaryotes are only around 30% identical, and the proteins belong to different subgroups of extended similarity. The future will show if all these sequences are in fact glyoxalase II proteins.

From experiments on specific chemical modification resulting in inactivation of the glyoxalase II enzyme, it was proposed that histidine, arginine (or lysine), and aspartic acid (or glutamic acid) residues are required for the function of glyoxalase II (1, 41, 42). Each of these residues can be found in one or more of the conserved boxes, especially three histidine residues are totally conserved in box II (TH-H-DH).

However, the exact biological role of the ubiquitous glyoxalase system remains in the dark. The notion that the system could be involved in the regulation of cell proliferation (1, 8, 9) is not supported by our data as none of the deletion mutants showed a change in growth rate on either glucose or glycerol as sole carbon source. Maybe the system is important for survival under some still unknown physiological condition which leads to a much higher methylglyoxal level in the cell than present under "normal" growth condition. It has been shown (43) that the glutathione content in S. cerevisiae varies between different growth conditions. Therefore, another alternative role of the glyoxalase system could be the recycling of glutathione that has been "trapped" spontaneously by methylglyoxal resulting in the formation of hemithioacetal (1, 44). This hypothesis is supported by the fact that even in the presence of active glyoxalase I but in the absence of any glyoxalase II enzyme the growth in methylglyoxal-containing medium is inhibited. Another possible explanation of this growth inhibition toxicity of high SLG levels has to be assumed. The deletion mutants generated in this work will be very helpful to test these possibilities to some extent.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by Grant P10831-MOB from the Austrian Fonds zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung FWF.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) X82893 (GLO4) and Y10292 (GLO2).


Dagger    To whom correspondence should be addressed: Institute for Genetics and General Biology, University of Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstrasse 34, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria. Tel.: 662-8044-5750; Fax: 662-8044-144; E-mail: arnold.bito{at}sbg.ac.at.
1   The abbreviations used are: SLG, S-D-lactoylglutathione; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; bp, base pair(s); ORF, open reading frame.
2   The gene names GLO2 and GLO4 were reserved in the SGD Gene Name Registry (internet: http://genome-www.stanford.edu.html); the gene name GLO3 was already registered for a gene encoding a zinc finger protein of yet unknown function with similarity to the Gcs1 protein (Gcs1p-like ORF).
3   This program is available on the Internet, (URL:http: //psort.nibb.ac.jp).

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. R. Schricker for the suggestions on the preparation of mitochondria and Dr. G. Schatz (Basel) for providing the antibodies used. We are grateful to Dr. P. Briza and R. Nestelbacher for the help with the data base searches and analysis. We thank the rotation students A. Eiböck, D. Almer, R. Regl, K. Önder, and E. Doppler, who participated in some of the experiments presented here.


Note Added in Proof

Recently a cDNA sequence for a glyoxalase II enzyme from Arabidopsis thaliana was characterized by Ridderström and Mannervik (46) (GenBank/EMBL accession no. Y08357). The deduced protein sequence is different from the sequence of the putative glyoxalase II from A. thaliana shown in Fig. 3 in the present article. The sequence in Ref. 46 shares all six homology boxes shown in Fig. 3 and is more closely related to the sequences of the two yeast glyoxalase II proteins (37.3% and 36.0% identities compared to the Glo2p and Glo4p sequences, respectively) than the sequence shown in Fig. 3.


REFERENCES

  1. Thornalley, P. J. (1990) Biochem. J. 269, 1-11 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Richard, J. P. (1993) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 21, 549-553 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Cooper, R. A. (1984) Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 38, 49-68 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Murata, K., Fukuda, Y., Watanabe, K., Saikusa, T., Shimosaka, M., and Kimura, A. (1985) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 131, 190-198 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Jerzykowski, T., Winter, R., Matuszewski, W., and Piskorska, D. (1978) Int. J. Biochem. 9, 853-860 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Hopkins, F. G., and Morgan, E. J. (1945) Biochem. J. 39, 320-324
  7. Darling, T. N., and Blum, J. (1988) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 28, 121-128 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Inoue, Y., and Kimura, A. (1995) Adv. Microb. Physiol. 37, 177-227 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Deswal, R., Chakravarty, T. N., and Sopory, S. K. (1993) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 21, 527-530 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Inoue, Y., and Kimura, A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 25958-25965 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Rhee, H.-I., Murata, K., and Kimura, A. (1988) Agric. Biol. Chem. 52, 2243-2246
  12. Ranganathan, S., Walsh, E. S., Godwin, A. K., and Tew, K. D. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 5661-5667 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Kim, N.-S., Umezawa, Y., Ohmura, S., and Kato, S. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 11217-11221 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Espartero, J., Sanchez-Aguayo, I., and Pardo, J. M. (1995) Plant Mol. Biol. 29, 1223-1233 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Ridderström, M., Saccucci, F., Hellman, U., Bergman, T., Principato, G., and Mannervik, B. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 319-323 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Talesa, V., Uotila, L., Koivusalo, M., Principato, G. B., Giovannini, E., and Rosi, G. (1988) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 955, 103-110 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Wallner, J. (1991) Molekulargenetische Untersuchung der Hefesporengermination, Ph.D. thesis, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  18. Saiki, R. K., Scharf, S., Faloona, F., Mullis, K. B., Horn, G. T., Erlich, H. A., and Arnheim, N. (1985) Science 230, 1350-1354 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  20. Tabor, S., and Richardson, C. C. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 4767-4771 [Abstract]
  21. Hill, J. E., Myers, A. M., Koerner, T. J., and Tzagoloff, A. (1986) Yeast 2, 163-167 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Way, M., Pope, B., Gooch, J., Hawkins, M., and Weeds, A. G. (1990) EMBO J. 9, 4103-4109 [Abstract]
  23. Johnston, M., and Davis, R. W. (1984) Mol. Cell. Biol. 4, 1440-1448 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Rothstein, J. R. (1983) Methods Enzymol. 101, 202-211 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Wach, A., Brachat, A., Pöhlmann, R., and Philippsen, P. (1994) Yeast 10, 1793-1808 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Reed, K. C., and Mann, D. A. (1985) Nucleic Acids Res. 13, 7207-7221 [Abstract]
  27. Feinberg, A. P., and Vogelstein, B. (1983) Anal. Biochem. 132, 6-13 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Daum, G., Böhni, P. C., and Schatz, G. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 13028-13033 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Yaffe, M. P. (1991) Methods Enzymol. 194, 627-643 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Murata, K., Saikusa, T., Watanabe, K., Inoue, Y., Fukuda, Y., Shimosaka, M., and Kimura, A. (1986) Agric. Biol. Chem. 50, 2381-2383
  33. Allen, R. E., Lo, T. W. C., and Thornalley, P. J. (1993) Eur. J. Biochem. 213, 1261-1267 [Abstract]
  34. Broach, J. R., Strathern, J. N., and Hicks, J. B. (1979) Gene (Amst.) 8, 121-133 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Haider, M. (1994) Molekulare Analyse des Gens GER 1 von Saccharomyces cerevisiae, M.Sc. thesis, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
  36. Studier, F. W., Rosenberg, A. H., Dunn, J. J., and Dubendorff, J. W. (1990) Methods Enzymol. 185, 60-89 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Misra, K., Banerjee, A. B., Ray, S., and Ray, M. (1995) Biochem. J. 305, 999-1003 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Nakai, K., and Kanehisa, M. (1992) Genomics 14, 897-911 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Kosugi, N., Inoue, Y., Rhee, H.-I., Murata, K., and Kimura, A. (1988) Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 28, 263-267
  40. Gavel, Y., and Von Heijne, G. (1990) Protein Eng. 4, 33-37 [Abstract]
  41. Ball, J. C., and Vander Jagt, D. L. (1981) Biochemistry 20, 899-905 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Principato, G. B., Rosi, G., Talesa, V., Giovannini, E., and Uotila, L. (1987) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 911, 349-355 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Berthe-Corti, L., Hulsch, R., Nevries, U., and Echardt-Schupp, F. (1992) Mutagenesis 7, 25-30 [Abstract]
  44. Creighton, D. L., Migliorini, M., Pourmotabbed, T., and Guha, M. K. (1988) Biochemistry 27, 7376-7384 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Yanish-Perron, C., Vieira, J., and Messing, J. (1985) Gene (Amst.) 33, 103-119 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Ridderström, M., and Mannervik, B. (1997) Biochem. J. 322, 449-454 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.