Cell-surface Interactions of Echovirus 22*

(Received for publication, March 6, 1997, and in revised form, May 28, 1997)

Timo Pulli Dagger §, Erkki Koivunen par and Timo Hyypiä Dagger §

From the Dagger  National Public Health Institute, Mannerheimintie 166, FIN-00300 Helsinki, § MediCity Research Laboratory, University of Turku, Tykistökatu 6A, FIN-20520 Turku, and the par  Division of Biochemistry, Viikinkaari 5, P.O. Box 56, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Echovirus 22 (EV22) is a picornavirus forming a distinct molecular cluster together with echovirus 23. EV22 has an Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) peptide motif in its capsid protein VP1; similar motifs are known to mediate many cell-cell and microbe-host interactions. To identify peptide sequences that specifically bind to EV22 and potentially play a role in receptor recognition, we have used here peptide libraries displayed in filamentous phage. We isolated an EV22-binding motif CLRSG(R/F)GC. The synthetic CLRSGRGC peptide was able to inhibit EV22 infection. The infection was also inhibited by an RGD-containing peptide representing the C terminus of the EV22 capsid protein VP1 and CWDDGWLC (an RGD-binding peptide; Pasqualini, R., Koivunen, E., and Ruoslahti, E. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 130, 1189-1196). As the EV22-recognizing sequence LRSG is found in the integrin beta 1 chain and the entire LRSGRG hexapeptide occurs in the matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9), we carried out blocking experiments with anti-integrin and anti-MMP-9 antibodies. EV22 infection could be blocked in cell cultures with anti-alpha v, -beta 1, and, to a lesser extent, with anti-MMP-9 antibodies. These results imply that EV22 recognizes preferentially alpha vbeta 1-integrin as a cellular receptor and MMP-9 may also play a role in the cell-surface interactions of the virus.


INTRODUCTION

Echovirus 22 (EV22)1 was originally classified as an enterovirus in the family Picornaviridae, but recent molecular data suggest that it is a representative of an independent picornavirus genus (1). Picornaviruses are small non-enveloped RNA viruses that include several pathogens of man and animals, and their medical and economic importance has stimulated considerable research activity. These viruses have a single-stranded mRNA genome, between about 7 and 8.5 kilobases in length, surrounded by an icosahedral capsid consisting of 60 copies of four structural proteins VP1-VP4 (for a review, see Ref. 2); however, in EV22 the maturation cleavage between VP2 and VP4 does not seem to occur (3). EV22 is known to cause both diarrhea and respiratory infections, and occasionally the infection is complicated by the involvement of the central nervous system (4). EV22 infection is common in childhood and more than 85% of young adults have EV22 antibodies.2

Interestingly, the sequence of EV22 revealed that it carries a tripeptide motif arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) in its capsid protein VP1 (1). Such an RGD motif is involved in multiple biological recognition reactions; in particular, the cellular matrix proteins vitronectin and fibronectin use their RGD sequence in binding to cell-surface receptors known as integrins (for reviews, see Refs. 5 and 6; Table I). Integrins that recognize the RGD motif include alpha 5beta 1, alpha IIbbeta 3, alpha vbeta 1, alpha vbeta 3, and alpha vbeta 5 subunit combinations. A number of microbes are also able to utilize this motif in binding to their host cell (Table I). For instance, during the initiation of adenovirus 2 (7), coxsackievirus A9 (CAV9; Refs. 8-10), echovirus 22 (EV22; Ref. 3), and foot-and-mouth disease virus (11) infections, cellular interactions are known to be mediated by the RGD motifs found in viral proteins. It has also been reported that the bacteria species Yersinia (12) and Bordetella (13) can recognize integrins on the cell surface.

Table I. Alignment of regions of selected viral and cellular polypeptides containing an RGD sequence

EV, echovirus; CAV, coxsackie A virus; FMDV, foot and mouth disease virus.

EV22 RCPNFFFPLPAPKVTSSRALRGDMANLTNQ
EV23 RCPNFFFPLPAPK.PATRKYRGDLATWSDQ
CAV9 PITDTRKDINTVTTVAQSRRRGDMSTLNTH
FMDV VLATVYNGECRYSRNAVPNLRGDLQVLAQK
Adenovirus 2 NSNAAAAAMQPVEDMNDHAIRGDTFATRAE
Fibronectin TISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTGRGDSPASSKP
Vitronectin CSYYQSCCTDYYAECKPQVTRGDVFTMPED
Fibrinogen PSRGKSSSYSKQFTSSTSYNRGDSTFESKS
Osteopontin DLPATEVFTPVVPTVDTYDGRGDSVVYGLR
Bone sialoprotein GEYEYTGVNEYDNGYEIYESRGDNYRAYED

During the past few years, several other picornavirus receptors, in addition to those recognized by CAV9, foot-and-mouth disease virus, and EV22, have been identified. The cellular receptor of the major group of rhinoviruses is the intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (14, 15). Intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and the poliovirus receptor (16) are members of the immunoglobulin superfamily. Furthermore, it has been reported that the integrin alpha 2beta 1 (VLA-2) acts as a cellular receptor for EV1 (17, 18), whereas several other EVs interact with the decay accelerating factor (CD55; Refs. 19, 20). At least six EV serotypes (subtypes 6, 7, 11, 12, 20, and 21) and three coxsackie-B viruses (subtypes 1, 3, and 5; Refs. 21 and 22) can use decay accelerating factor as their receptor. A polypeptide belonging to the nucleolin family is also involved in coxsackie-B viruses cell-surface interactions (23).

It has been reported previously that CAV9 can compete with the binding of EV22 to green monkey kidney cells (9). This suggests that EV22 and CAV9 may share a common cellular receptor. The aim of the present study was to illustrate further the interactions of these RGD-containing human picornaviruses with the host-cell membrane proteins and to identify receptors interacting with the viruses. For this purpose, the technique of affinity selection of virus-binding peptides from a phage display random peptide library was applied. We have isolated peptide motifs that suggest the involvement of integrins and also, quite unexpectedly, of a proteolytic enzyme MMP-9 in the cellular entry of EV22.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Cells and Viruses

A549, a human lung carcinoma cell line (obtained from the American Type Culture Collection, ATCC), was used for EV22 (1) propagation and plaque tests, and LLC-Mk2 cells (ATCC) were used to grow CAV9 (strain Griggs; ATCC). The viruses were purified in sucrose gradients as described previously (24).

Phage Display Peptide Libraries

We used a combination of phage libraries containing 5-9 amino acid long cyclic peptides inserted in the pIII capsid protein in the M13 phage. The libraries were constructed using the fuse5 vector (25) as described earlier (26-28).

Selection of EV22-binding Peptides from the Phage Display Library

In the first round of biopanning, the purified EV22 or CAV9 was used at a concentration of 5 µg per well in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.5 mM MgCl2 and incubated overnight at 4 °C in microtiter wells. The wells were then saturated with the blocking solution (0.1 M NaHCO3, 5 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA)) for 1 h at 4 °C. Prior to panning with the virus, the phages were incubated for 1 h at 4 °C in BSA-coated wells in 500 µl of Tris-buffered saline supplemented with 1 mg/ml BSA and 0.5 mM MgCl2. The phage solution was then transferred to the virus-coated wells, and after incubation for 1 h at 4 °C, the unbound phages were removed by washing 10 times with the Tris-buffered saline containing 0.5% Tween 20. The bound phages were eluted with 400 µl of 0.1 M HCl (pH 2.2, adjusted with glycine) in the presence of 1 mg/ml BSA. After the elution, pH was neutralized with 75 µl of 1 M Tris-HCl. The eluted phages were amplified using K91kan bacteria and purified by precipitation with polyethylene glycol as described earlier (25). After amplification, the panning procedure was repeated twice as described above with the exception that the wells were coated with 1 µg of the purified virus. Phage DNA was purified (25) and sequenced using the Sequenase 2.0 kit (U. S. Biochemical Corp.). Peptide sequences found in the phages were compared against protein sequences in the SwissProt data base using the FASTA program (29).

Peptides and Antibodies

The synthesized peptides were purified by high performance liquid chromatography. CLRSGRGC was reduced and alkylated essentially as described (30) and subsequently purified by high performance liquid chromatography. The following antibodies were used in the virus blocking experiments: the monoclonal antibodies included anti-alpha v L230 (ATCC), anti-alpha 5 P1D6 (Life Technologies, Inc.), and anti-beta 3 90BB10 B7 (kindly provided by Prof. Ismo Virtanen, Department of Anatomy, University of Helsinki). Anti-MMP-9 (Ref. 31; kindly provided by Dr. Timo Sorsa, Department of Periodontology, University of Helsinki) and anti-beta 1 R322 (a gift from Dr. Jyrki Heino, MediCity Research Laboratory, University of Turku) were polyclonal rabbit antisera.

Blocking of the Infectivity with the Peptides and Antibodies

The A549 cells were grown as a monolayer in 3.5-cm diameter wells (8). The cells were washed once with Hanks' balanced salt solution supplemented with 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.4 (h-Hanks), and 50 µl of antibodies or peptides (dilutions made in h-Hanks, containing 0.6% fetal calf serum) was added on the cells and incubated for 45 min at room temperature. Fifty µl (approximately 100 plaque-forming units) of EV22 or CAV9 dilution (made in h-Hanks, 0.6% fetal calf serum, containing the corresponding antibody or peptide) was added onto the cells and incubated for 15 min at room temperature. The virus solution in the plates was replaced with 0.5% carboxymethyl cellulose in the culture medium, and the incubation was continued for 48 h in a CO2-humidified incubator at 37 °C. Prior to counting the number of the virus plaques, the cells were stained for 5 min with crystal violet solution (0.25% crystal violet, 2% formaline, 10% ethanol, 0.5% CaCl2, 35 mM Tris).


RESULTS

Identification of EV22- and CAV9-binding Peptides in the Phage Display Library and Their Comparison with Known Sequences

EV22- and CAV9-binding peptides were selected from phage display peptide libraries containing random peptides from five to nine amino acids, each peptide flanked by cysteine residues. Microtiter wells were coated with the purified viruses, and the phages exhibiting binding activity to the virus were selected by a biopanning protocol.

After three cycles of panning in EV22-coated wells, 170 times more phages could be eluted from the virus-coated wells than from those coated with BSA (control wells). Seventeen phage plaques were selected for further sequence analysis. Twelve of them carried the cyclic peptide CLRSGRGC, and five phages had the CLRSGFGC sequence (Table II). After three rounds of panning in CAV9-coated wells, approximately five times more phage were eluted from the wells containing the virus than from the control wells. Fifteen of the CAV9-binding phages were sequenced. Eleven had a sequence CVWDWGDC, two contained CVWDLGRC, and two CVWDQGIC sequence (Table II). Although the phage libraries used in the study contained peptides of different length, all the sequenced phage carried a hexapeptide. This suggests that the cyclic hexapeptide motifs bind more tightly to the viruses than other peptides in the libraries.

Table II. Selection of peptides binding to EV22 and CAV9 from the phage display library

The phage were selected using wells coated with purified EV22 or CAV9. The phages bound were eluted with a glycine HCl buffer of pH 2.2. Randomly picked phage clones were sequenced after the third round of panning. The conserved amino acids are shown in bold, and the number of clones encoding the same peptide is shown in parentheses.

EV22 binding peptides CAV9 binding peptides

CLRSGRGC (12) CVWDWGDC (11)
CLRSGFGC  (5) CVWDLGRC  (2)
CVWDQGIC  (2)

The consensus sequences LRSG (EV22) and VWD (CAV9) were compared against the sequences in the SwissProt data bank (Table III). Since it is known that integrins alpha 5beta 1 and alpha vbeta 1 recognize the RGD sequence in fibronectin (32), it is notable that, for instance, the beta 1 integrin subunit also shares the sequence LRSG in its extracellular domain (33). A complete identity with the LRSGRG peptide was found in the matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9; Ref. 34). It has been recently shown that MMP-2 is colocalized with integrin alpha vbeta 3 on the cell surface of invasive cells (35).

Table III. Examples of receptors and other extracellular proteins containing the identical amino acid motifs with those found in EV22- and CAV9-binding phages (see Table II)

The sequence source was the SwissProt database, FASTA program was used for the sequence homology analysis. The amino acids identical to those found in the phage sequences are shown in bold.

Proteins sharing the same amino acid motif with the EV22-binding phages
  Matrix metalloproteinase 9 QVTGALRSGRGKML
  Lymphocyte activation gene 3 protein VGPGGLRSGRLPLQ
  ACT35 antigen CTWCNLRSGSERKQ
  Fibrinogen-like protein AVLRDLRSGTLYSL
  Integrin chain beta 1 QLVLRLRSGEPQTF
  Leukocyte antigen-related protein GRIKQLRSGALQIE
  Utrophin EIETNLRSGPVAGI
Proteins sharing the same amino acid motif with the CAV9-binding phages
  Integrin beta 5 subunit KVELSVWDQPEDL
  Villin VFLLDVWDQVFFW
  Kallmann syndrome protein VTVTIVWDLPEEP
  Tyrosine-protein kinase receptor FLT4 DGQEVVWDDRRGM
  Lymphocyte differentiation antigen CD38 VDCQSVWDAFKGA
  Macrophage colony-stimulating factor I receptor AQVLQVWDDPYPE
  Transferrin receptor protein CD71 ALSGDVWDIDNEF
  Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide receptor 2 KACSGVWDNITCW
  Vasopressin V1A receptor IQMWSVWDPMSVW
  Von Willebrand factor KALSVVWDRHLSI

Among the VWD-containing proteins is integrin beta 5 subunit which contains a VWDQ sequence in its extracellular domain; integrin alpha vbeta 5 recognizes the RGD sequence in vitronectin (32).

EV22-binding Peptides Block Infectivity

To study further the functional role of selected virus-binding peptides in the cell-surface interactions of EV22 and CAV9, the capability of synthetic peptides to block the infection was assayed. An RGD-containing peptide representing the C terminus of EV22 VP1 polypeptide (SRALRGDMANLTNQ) and an RGD-binding peptide (CWDDGWLC; Ref. 36) were also used in the blocking experiments. The results of these experiments, obtained by the plaque tests, are shown in Fig. 1. The C-terminal EV22 VP1 peptide and the cyclic CLRSGRGC peptide blocked EV22 infection at a concentration of 0.1 mM, whereas the control peptide (NGKKKNWKKIM, the N terminus of EV22 VP3) did not interfere with the initiation of infection at this concentration. The activity of CLRSGRGC was lost after reduction and alkylation of the cysteines (not shown). At a concentration of 1 mM, the RGD-recognizing CWDDGWLC peptide blocked the infection, whereas at lower concentrations the effect disappeared.


Fig. 1. Blocking of EV22 (A) and CAV9 (B) infections with synthetic peptides. The A549 cells were preincubated with the peptides for 45 min. Subsequently, the virus stock containing the peptide was added onto the cells and incubated for 15 min. The virus solution was replaced with 0.5% carboxymethyl cellulose in the culture medium and the incubation continued for 48 h. The cells were stained with crystal violet solution prior to counting the number of virus plaques. The results are expressed as the proportion of the plaques (%) compared with the control experiments without the peptide. The data represent means from two experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (17K GIF file)]

The peptide found in the CAV9-binding phages (CVWDWGDC) had no effect on the EV22 growth. For comparison, blocking experiments with the peptides were also studied in CAV9 infection. Only the RGD-containing peptide blocked the infectivity of this virus. The blocking effect at a peptide concentration of 0.1 mM was even 40% higher, when compared with the EV22 blocking activity. None of the other peptides significantly inhibited CAV9 infection.

Anti-integrin and Anti-MMP-9 Antibodies Block EV22 Infection

Since the consensus sequence LRSG (found in the EV22-binding phage) is present in the integrin beta 1 subunit and in MMP-9, we carried out blocking experiments using anti-integrin and anti-MMP-9 antibodies (Fig. 2A). The monoclonal anti-alpha v antibody and polyclonal serum recognizing the beta 1 integrin subunit exhibited blocking of the EV22 infection at high dilutions (1:1000), whereas the monoclonal anti-beta 3 antibody had some effect on the virus growth only at a dilution of 1:10. The polyclonal anti-MMP-9 antibody inhibited EV22 infection but to a lesser extent than the anti-alpha v and -beta 1 antibodies. The monoclonal anti-alpha 5 antibody used had no effect on the virus growth at any dilution.


Fig. 2. Blocking of EV22 (A) and CAV9 (B) infections with antibodies. The virus stocks containing the antibody were added onto A549 cells preincubated for 45 min with the same antibody. After 15 min the virus solution was replaced with 0.5% carboxymethyl cellulose in the culture medium. The blocking effect (%), reduction of plaques, was calculated after 48 h incubation by comparison with the plates infected in the absence of antibodies. The data represent means from two experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (17K GIF file)]

The inhibitory effect of the antibodies was also studied in CAV9 infection (Fig. 2B). CAV9 infection was blocked with the anti-alpha v and -beta 1 antibodies (30 and 60% inhibition, respectively) at dilutions of 1:100. The anti-beta 3 antibody also blocked the virus infection at the same dilution, although the effect was significantly lower. Some blocking of CAV9 infection was also seen with the anti-MMP-9 antibody, but the effect vanished at the antibody dilution of 1:100. As in the case of EV22, the anti-alpha 5 antibody had no effect on the initiation of the growth cycle of CAV9.


DISCUSSION

In this study we have applied an approach based on phage display peptide libraries to elucidate cell-surface interactions of EV22. We demonstrate that EV22 infection can be blocked with (i) the CLRSGRGC peptide found in the EV22-binding phages, (ii) an RGD-containing peptide representing the C terminus of EV22 capsid protein VP1, and (iii) an RGD-binding peptide (36). The LRSG consensus sequence, found in the EV22 binding phages, is present in the extracellular domain of integrin beta 1 subunit. Integrins alpha vbeta 1 and alpha 5beta 1 are known to bind to the RGD sequence (32). The amino acid sequence found in the EV22-binding phages is also identical to the sequence in the matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9).

To illuminate further the role of integrins and MMP-9 in the cell-surface interactions of EV22, we carried out blocking experiments with anti-integrin and anti-MMP-9 antibodies. The monoclonal alpha v antibody and polyclonal beta 1 antiserum clearly inhibited the infection, whereas the anti-beta 3 antibody had a blocking effect only at high concentrations. Furthermore, anti-MMP-9 antibody also inhibited EV22 infection, although less efficiently. These results suggest that integrin alpha vbeta 1 acts preferentially as a cellular receptor for EV22 and MMP-9 may also be involved in the receptor interactions of the virus.

CAV9-binding peptides were also selected from the phage display library, and blocking experiments were performed. Only the RGD-containing peptide clearly blocked the virus infection. Because the sequence (VWDQ) found in the CAV9 binding phage is present in the integrin beta 5 chain, we carried out virus blocking tests with a monoclonal anti-alpha vbeta 5 antibody, but it had no effect on the virus growth (data not shown). However, the CAV9 infection was blocked by the anti-alpha v monoclonal antibody and rabbit antiserum recognizing the beta 1 subunit. It is possible that the peptide identified by the phage display library and the RGD-recognizing peptide both bind the RGD-containing motif in CAV9, but this interaction does not necessarily block infectivity. This phenomenon has also been observed in experiments where the motif has been deleted by trypsin treatment (8) or by mutation (10). The anti-beta 3 integrin subunit as well as the anti-MMP-9 antibody also had a blocking effect but only when used at the higher concentrations. Previously published data support the idea that at least alpha vbeta 3 integrin plays a role in the cell-surface interactions of CAV9 (9).

The blocking experiments suggest that EV22 may bind to the alpha vbeta 1 integrin with the RGD-containing C terminus of capsid protein VP1. In addition, our results indicate that at least one of the virus-binding sites is evidently located in the region of amino acids 103-106 (LRSG) in the beta 1 chain. This site is located near the I domain, a region in the beta 1 subunit that is known to participate in the binding to the ligand (37). However, the results do not reveal how the alpha v chain is involved in the virus-receptor interactions. One possibility is that in the experimental conditions the anti-alpha v antibody binds to the alpha v subunit in such a manner that sterically blocks the binding of EV22 to the beta 1 chain.

Our results raise the possibility that matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) is involved in the cell-surface interactions of EV22 because the infection could be inhibited by the CLRSGRGC peptide and by anti-MMP-9 antibody. The LRSGRG sequence is present in the C-terminal hemopexin domain of MMP-9 which has been shown to be important for the ability of the protein to dimerize (38). We have also independently isolated the LRSGXG motif (where X is preferentially arginine) during panning on purified MMP-9 using the same phage libraries described here.3 These results suggest that the LRSGRG sequence could be involved in the dimerization of MMP-9, and EV22 may be able to bind MMP-9 through the dimer interface. It has been shown recently that matrix metalloproteinase 2 interacts with integrin alpha vbeta 3 on the cell surface (35), and the integrin can simultaneously bind to proteolyzed collagen fragments. The alpha vbeta 1 integrin could also interact with MMP-9, and the complex might then be involved in the internalization of EV22. Alternatively, EV22 could separately interact with either alpha vbeta 1 or MMP-9.

Three human picornaviruses (CAV9, EV22, and EV23) have a functional RGD motif; in addition, foot-and-mouth disease virus interacts with the alpha vbeta 3 integrin using the viral RGD sequence (11, 39). In the three human viruses, the motif is located at the C terminus of the capsid polypeptide VP1. In CAV9, this region can be deleted by trypsin treatment (8) or the RGD motif mutated (10) without complete loss of infectivity indicating that the virus can use alternative pathways in its entry into the host cell. The processing of the C-terminal extension of CAV9 VP1 by proteolytic enzymes may have implications in the pathogenicity because during the infection in the gut the virus is prone to the action of intestinal proteases. Whether destruction of the RGD motif in EV22 abolishes the infectivity is, however, currently unknown.

EV22 and CAV9 compete for cell-surface binding, and the latter is known to interact with the vitronectin receptor (alpha vbeta 3-integrin; Ref. 9). This observation, suggesting that EV22 would also utilize an RGD-recognizing integrin on the cell surface, is strongly supported by our findings that peptides interacting specifically with the virus share sequence homology with the integrin beta 1-subunit, and the infection is blocked by beta 1-antibodies. Although CAV9 and EV22 exhibit similarities in the cell-surface recognition mechanisms, there are also clear differences. A monoclonal antibody that is able to block the infection caused by typical echoviruses (excluding serotypes 22 and 23) and CAV9 is unable to inhibit EV22 infectivity (40). This suggests that additional receptor activities can also be important and may be crucial in the determination of tissue tropism and pathogenesis of these viruses.

Due to the possibility of rapidly selecting large numbers of peptides that recognize target molecules, the phage display peptide libraries represent a powerful approach in detailed studies of virus-cell interactions. The technique has been successfully used, for example, for the identification of (i) complementary peptide sequences in counterpart proteins of integrins (27, 28, 30), (ii) ligands reacting with the adenovirus 2 penton capsomer (41) and Puumala virus (42), and (iii) epitope(s) recognized by monoclonal antibodies (43, 44) or polyclonal serum (45). In our study, we used the phage peptide library to investigate the receptor interactions of EV22 and CAV9. Although the EV22 peptides obtained by using the phage display technique blocked the infectivity of the virus, the peptides identified in a similar manner by using CAV9 as a target did not inhibit the growth cycle of CAV9. This can be explained either by inefficient binding of the latter peptides or by the differences in cell-surface recognition mechanisms of these two viruses; the RGD-mediated attachment may be the major mechanism in EV22, whereas CAV9 is able to use alternative pathways in its entry as already shown by mutation analysis of the RGD-containing region in CAV9 (10). Our results clarify previously reported receptor specificities of EV22 and propose new, perhaps more complex, mechanisms for EV22 entry.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by grants from The Academy of Finland, The Orion Corp. Research Foundation, The Sigrid Juselius Foundation, and The Turku University Foundation.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
   To whom correspondence should be addressed: National Public Health Institute, Enterovirus Laboratory, Mannerheimintie 166, FIN-00300 Helsinki, Finland. Tel.: 358-9-4744 415; Fax: 358-9-4744 355; E-mail: timo.pulli{at}ktl.fi.
1   The abbreviations used are: EV22, echovirus 22; RGD, arginine-glycine-aspartic acid; CAV, coxsackie A-virus; MMP-9, matrix metalloproteinase 9; BSA, bovine serum albumin;
2   P. Joki-Korpela and T. Hyypiä, submitted for publication.
3   E. Koivunen, H. Valtanen, A. Rainsalo, C. Kantor, C. G. Gahmberg, T. Salo, Y. T. Konttinen, and T. Sorsa, submitted for publication.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. Jyrki Heino, Merja Roivainen, Timo Sorsa, and Prof. Ismo Virtanen for providing the antibodies. Drs. Jyrki Heino, Merja Roivainen, Timo Sorsa, Glyn Stanway, and Prof. Tapani Hovi are also acknowledged for stimulating discussions and Marita Maaronen for skillful technical assistance.


REFERENCES

  1. Hyypiä, T., Horsnell, C., Maaronen, M., Khan, M., Kalkkinen, N., Auvinen, P., Kinnunen, L., and Stanway, G. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 8847-8851 [Abstract]
  2. Stanway, G. (1990) J. Gen. Virol. 71, 2483-2501 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Stanway, G., Kalkkinen, N., Roivainen, M., Ghazi, F., Khan, M., Smyth, M., Meurman, O., and Hyypiä, T. (1994) J. Virol. 68, 8232-8238 [Abstract]
  4. Ehrnst, A., and Eriksson, M. (1993) Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 25, 275-281 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Ruoslahti, E., and Pierschbacher, M. D. (1987) Science 238, 491-493 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Hynes, R. O. (1992) Cell 69, 11-25 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Wickham, T. J., Mathias, P., Cheresh, D. A., and Nemerow, G. R. (1993) Cell 73, 309-319 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Roivainen, M., Hyypiä, T., Piirainen, L., Kalkkinen, N., Stanway, G., and Hovi, T. (1991) J. Virol. 65, 4735-4740 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Roivainen, M., Piirainen, L., Hovi, T., Virtanen, I., Riikonen, T., Heino, J., and Hyypiä, T. (1994) Virology 203, 357-365 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Hughes, P. J., Horsnell, C., Hyypiä, T., and Stanway, G. (1995) J. Virol. 69, 8035-8040 [Abstract]
  11. Fox, G., Parry, N. R., Barnett, P. V., McGinn, B., Rowlands, D., and Brown, F. (1989) J. Gen. Virol. 70, 625-637 [Abstract]
  12. Isberg, R. R. (1991) Science 252, 934-938 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Relman, D., Tuomanen, E., Falkow, S., Golenbock, D. T., Saukkonen, K., and Wright, S. D. (1990) Cell 61, 1375-1382 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Staunton, D. E., Merluzzi, V. J., Rothlein, R., Barton, R., Marlin, S. D., and Springer, T. A. (1989) Cell 56, 849-853 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Greve, J. M., Davis, G., Meyer, A. M., Forte, C. P., Yost, S. C., Marlor, C. W., Kamarck, M. E., and McClelland, A. (1989) Cell 56, 839-847 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Mendelsohn, C., Wimmer, E., and Racaniello, V. R. (1989) Cell 56, 855-865 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Bergelson, J. M., Shepley, M. P., Chan, B. M. C., Hemler, M. E., and Finberg, R. W. (1992) Science 225, 1718-1720
  18. Bergelson, J. M., St John, N., Kawaguchi, S., Chan, M., Stubdal, H., Modlin, J., and Finberg, R. W. (1993) J. Virol. 67, 6847-6852 [Abstract]
  19. Bergelson, J. M., Chan, M., Solomon, K. R., St John, N. F., Huamao, L., and Finberg, R. W. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 6245-6248 [Abstract]
  20. Ward, T., Pipkin, P. A., Clarkson, N. A., Stone, D. M., Minor, P. D., and Almond, J. W. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 5070-5074 [Abstract]
  21. Bergelson, J. M., Mohanty, J. G., Crowell, R. L., St. John, N. F., Lublin, D. M., and Finberg, R. W. (1995) J. Virol. 69, 1903-1906 [Abstract]
  22. Shafren, D. R., Bates, R. C., Agrez, M. V., Herd, R. L., Burns, G. F., and Barry, R. D. (1995) J. Virol. 69, 3873-3877 [Abstract]
  23. De Verdugo, U. R., Selinka, H.-C., Huber, M., Kramer, B., Kellerman, J., Hofschneider, P. H., and Kandolf, R. (1995) J. Virol. 69, 6751-6757 [Abstract]
  24. Abraham, G., and Colonno, R. J. (1984) J. Virol. 51, 340-345 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Smith, G. P., and Scott, J. K. (1993) Methods Enzymol. 217, 228-257 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Koivunen, E., Wang, B., Dickinson, G. D., and Ruoslahti, E. (1994) Methods Enzymol. 245, 346-369 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Koivunen, E., Wang, B., and Ruoslahti, E. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 124, 373-380 [Abstract]
  28. Koivunen, E., Wang, B., and Ruoslahti, E. (1995) Bio/Technology 13, 265-270 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Pearson, W. R., and Lipman, D. J. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 2444-2448 [Abstract]
  30. Koivunen, E., Gay, D. A., and Ruoslahti, E. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 20205-20210 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Kjeldsen, L., Johnsen, A. H., Sengelov, H., and Borregaard, N. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 10425-10432 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Ruoslahti, E. (1991) J. Clin. Invest. 87, 1-5 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Argraves, W. S., Suzuki, S., Arai, H., Thompson, K., Pierschbacher, M. D., and Ruoslahti, E. (1987) J. Cell Biol. 105, 1183-1190 [Abstract]
  34. Wilhelm, S. M., Collier, I. E., Marmer, B. L., Eisen, A. Z., Grant, G. A., and Goldberg, G. I. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 17213-17221 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Brooks, P. C., Strömblad, S., Sanders, L. C., von Schalscha, T. L., Aimes, R. T., Stetler-Stevenson, W. G., Quigley, J. P., and Cheresh, D. A. (1996) Cell 85, 683-693 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Pasqualini, R., Koivunen, E., and Ruoslahti, E. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 130, 1189-1196 [Abstract]
  37. Puzon-McLaughlin, W., and Takada, Y. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 20438-20443 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Goldberg, G. I., Strongin, A., Collier, I. E., Genrich, T., and Marmer, B. L. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 4583-4591 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Berinstein, A., Roivainen, M., Hovi, T., Mason, P. W., and Baxt, B. (1995) J. Virol. 69, 2664-2666 [Abstract]
  40. Mbida, A. D., Pozzetto, F., Grattard, F., and Gaudin, O. D. (1992) Res. Virol. 143, 397-400 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Hong, S. S., and Boulanger, P. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 4714-4727 [Abstract]
  42. Heiskanen, T., Lundkvist, Å., Vaheri, A., and Lankinen, H. (1997) J. Virol. 71, 3879-3885 [Abstract]
  43. Stephen, C. W., and Lane, D. P. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 225, 577-583 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Yayon, A., Aviezer, D., Safran, M., Gross, J. L., Heldman, Y., Cabilly, S., Givol, D., and Katchalski-Katzir, E. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 10643-10647 [Abstract]
  45. Germaschewski, V., and Murray, K. (1996) J. Virol. Methods 58, 21-32 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.