(Received for publication, January 10, 1997)
From the Verna and Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030
During oxidative protein folding, efficient catalysis of disulfide rearrangements by protein-disulfide isomerase is found to involve an escape mechanism that prevents the enzyme from becoming trapped in covalent complexes with substrates that fail to rearrange in a timely fashion. Protein-disulfide isomerase mutants with only a single active-site cysteine catalyze slow disulfide rearrangements and become trapped in a covalent complex with substrate. Escape is mediated by the second, more carboxyl-terminal cysteine at the active site. A glutathione redox buffer increases the kcat for single-cysteine mutants by 20-40-fold, but the presence of the second cysteine at the active site in the wild-type enzyme increases the kcat by over 200-fold. A model is developed in which kinetic scanning for disulfides of increasing reactivity is timed against an intramolecular clock provided by the second cysteine at the active site. This provides an alternative, more efficient mechanism for rearrangement involving the reduction and reoxidation of substrate disulfides.
With no known sequence cues to designate which cysteines should be cross-linked in a native protein, the question arises as to how correct pairs of cysteines are selected during folding and how this selection is made quickly enough to be useful in the cell. The uncatalyzed formation of native disulfides during in vitro protein folding is generally not fast enough to support the folding rate that is found in the cell (1). To overcome this, catalysis of disulfide formation and rearrangement in eukaryotes is provided by protein-disulfide isomerase (PDI),1 a 55-kDa protein of the endoplasmic reticulum (2).
As a catalyst, PDI must deal with different mechanisms for directing disulfide formation. With some proteins, such as bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor, the specification of cysteine connectivity occurs early in folding and is directed by the formation of native-like structures that are interconverted by intramolecular disulfide rearrangements (3). With other proteins, such as ribonuclease A (RNase), the identification of which cysteines to connect occurs late in folding resulting in a large collection of intermediates with random disulfides and substantial non-native structure that must be rearranged to give native connectivity (4). PDI is capable of accelerating folding that proceeds by either of these mechanisms (5, 9).
During the oxidative folding of reduced ribonuclease (RNase), PDI catalyzes the initial formation of substrate disulfides to yield a collection of inactive, RNase redox isomers that must be rearranged to the native disulfide pattern (6). PDI has two active sites that are housed in two, internally homologous thioredoxin domains, one near the amino terminus and the other near the carboxyl terminus (7). Both active sites contribute to PDI catalysis (8), but the two active sites are not equivalent (9). Each of the two active sites has two cysteine residues, found in the sequence WCGHCK (7). The two cysteines at each active site serve different functions. The cysteine nearer the amino terminus of the domain (WCGHCK) is essential for all catalytic activity (10-12), both oxidation and isomerization. Mutation of the cysteine closer to the carboxyl terminus (WCGHCK) selectively destroys the ability of PDI to catalyze disulfide formation. However, these mutants (NSO:COO and NOO:CSO)2 still retain a low but measurable amount of isomerase activity (10, 12), approximately 10-12% of the kcat of the wild-type enzyme (10).
Formally, the rearrangement of substrate disulfides does not require
the net oxidation or reduction of PDI or the substrate (Scheme I). A
disulfide rearrangement initiated by the attack of a single active-site
cysteine of PDI could propagate through the substrate and terminate by
expelling PDI (13). Consequently, we were surprised to find that PDI
mutants with only one cysteine at an active site were considerably less
effective than a wild-type active site in catalyzing rearrangements of
RNase during oxidative folding of the reduced substrate (10).
The formation of "incorrect" disulfides that must be isomerized during folding creates logistical problems for a catalyst like PDI. Isomerization is initiated by the formation of a covalent complex between the active-site cysteine and the substrate protein. The incorrect structures must be searched and searched again, scanning, isomerizing, and breaking disulfides until the native structure is found. However, forming disulfides with a "random" collection of substrates could be dangerous, since the rate of intramolecular rearrangement would depend on the reactivity of the substrate cysteine with a substrate disulfide. If PDI were to find itself in a covalent complex with a substrate molecule that rearranged slowly, the enzyme could become trapped and unavailable to other substrate molecules. One solution to this problem could be provided by an active site with two cysteines, one to initiate substrate rearrangement and a second to enable an escape pathway. The experiments described below were performed to determine whether escape through the second active-site cysteine is a common event during PDI catalysis. The results suggest that escape is, in fact, the dominant mechanism for PDI-dependent isomerization of scrambled RNase.
Recombinant rat PDI and its mutants were
constructed, expressed, and purified as described previously.
Glutathione (GSH), glutathione disulfide (GSSG), bovine pancreatic
ribonuclease A (RNase), urea, and dithiothreitol (DTT) were obtained
from Sigma. Scrambled RNase was prepared by a minor
modification of the method of Hillson et al. (14). RNase (10 mg/ml) was reduced at 37 °C for 2 h with 140 mM DTT
in 6 M guanidine hydrochloride, 0.1 M Tris·HCl at pH 8.3. The DTT was removed by ultrafiltration, replacing the reducing buffer with buffered 6 M guanidinium
hydrochloride. Oxygen was bubbled into the solution with stirring at
room temperature for several days until the residual thiol content was
<0.1 mol of SH/mol of RNase. After ultrafiltration to remove the
residual guanidinium hydrochloride and to exchange the buffer for 0.1% acetic acid, the scrambled RNase was stored at 80 °C until
use.
The activity of PDI and its mutants in catalyzing the rearrangement of sRNase was determined with a continuous spectrophotometric assay in which the concentration of active RNase was monitored by refolding in the presence of the substrate, cCMP at 25.0 °C in 0.1 M Tris·HCl, pH 8.0 (6). Assays were performed in duplicate or triplicate, including controls without PDI. Additional controls without cCMP showed that there was no significant absorbance contributed by RNase aggregation (9). After correction of the observed rate of active RNase formation for the uncatalyzed reaction, Km and kcat values were estimated by non-linear least squares fitting to the equation of a rectangular hyperbola. Errors reported are the standard deviations of the parameter estimates. The inhibition constant (Ki) for substrate inhibition was determined by fitting to the equation v = Vmax [S]/([S] + Km + [S]2/Ki) (15). In this case, fitting had to be constrained by fixing Vmax at that observed in the presence of redox buffer. End point assays of the overall yield of the refolding reaction were performed with a discontinuous assay using cCMP as substrate. Percent activity recovered was determined relative to a sample of the same concentration of wild-type RNase.
Other MethodsSDS-PAGE was performed by the method of Laemmli (16). Gels (12.5% polyacrylamide) were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue.
When presented with a fully reduced RNase substrate and a
glutathione redox buffer, mutants of PDI with a single, reactive cysteine (NSO:COO and
NOO:CSO) do not catalyze
significant RNase oxidation, but they still catalyze isomerization of
the spontaneously formed disulfides at a low, but significant, rate
(10-20% of the wild-type kcat) (10). To observe the isomerization reaction more directly without the
complication of inefficient catalysis of substrate oxidation, the
single-cysteine mutants,
NSO:COO and
NOO:CSO, were examined
for catalysis of the isomerization of scrambled RNase where the
substrate is completely oxidized (<0.2 mol of SH/mol of RNase). As
with reduced RNase as a substrate, the single-cysteine mutants of PDI
exhibit measurable, but low, activity at saturating RNase (Fig.
1). The kcat is only 10-12%
that observed for the wild-type enzyme under the same conditions (Table
I).
|
The relatively low activity of a single-cysteine active site in
catalyzing a simple rearrangement reaction is surprising. If the
dominant isomerization mechanism involves an intramolecular rearrangement of the substrate induced by the attack of PDI the active-site cysteine of PDI (Scheme I), one active-site
cysteine should be sufficient, and the presence or absence of a redox
buffer would be expected to have little effect. However, when the
glutathione redox buffer is omitted, the turnover numbers for the
mutants, NSO:COO and
NOO:CSO, are only
0.3-0.7% that of wild-type PDI (Fig. 2 and Table I).
However, in the absence of a redox buffer, all (>90%) of the
scrambled RNase is eventually converted to native enzyme suggesting
that PDI inactivation by oxygen oxidation and the subsequent cessation
of rearrangement is not responsible for the low activity. Furthermore,
the decreased activity cannot be explained by an effect of mutation on
the reactivity of the remaining cysteine, since Darby and Creighton
(17) found that the reactivity of the more amino-terminal cysteine in
the amino-terminal thioredoxin domain of PDI was decreased only 2-fold by mutation of the more carboxyl-terminal cysteine to alanine. Thus,
the simple mechanism of disulfide rearrangement (Scheme I) does not
appear to account for PDI catalysis of RNase rearrangements.
If PDI were to indiscriminately scan folding intermediates for reactive
disulfides, attack of the more amino-terminal, active-site cysteine on
a random substrate disulfide might occasionally engage PDI in a slowly
rearranging, covalent complex with substrate. In the wild-type active
site, the second cysteine could prevent PDI from becoming trapped in
these complexes by expelling the offending substrate, releasing PDI and
the substrate for another round of catalysis. According to this model,
the low activity of a single-cysteine active site would result from the
inability of PDI to escape from such complexes. In such a system, GSH
in the redox buffer would provide an intermolecular escape route and
stimulate the activity of single-cysteine mutants. In support of this
hypothesis, mutants with a single active-site cysteine (NSO:COO and
NOO:COS) accumulate as covalent complexes between RNase and PDI, but the wild-type enzyme (NSS:CSS) does not (Fig.
3).
Escape from the wild-type enzyme, mediated by the second active-site
cysteine, would convert the active-site dithiol to a disulfide and
release the RNase substrate with a reduced disulfide (Scheme
II). In the absence of a redox buffer, where there is no alternative source of oxidizing or reducing equivalents, the oxidized PDI would have to find a reduced RNase substrate and reoxidize it to
complete the reaction cycle. At higher concentrations of scrambled
RNase this should become increasingly difficult, leading to substrate
inhibition. As predicted, challenging reduced, wild-type PDI with
higher and higher concentrations of sRNase, produces significant
substrate inhibition if there is no redox buffer present (Fig.
4). However, if a redox buffer is available to recycle
the oxidized PDI back to the reduced state and provide GSSG to oxidize the substrate, RNase rearrangements are not subject to inhibition by
high scrambled RNase concentrations.
During catalysis of substrate isomerization, reduced PDI scans the unfolded protein for a reactive disulfide. When the cysteine of one of the active sites of PDI attacks a substrate disulfide, the covalent intermediate that is formed can suffer three alternative fates (Scheme II). The substrate cysteine that has just been released from a disulfide bond scans the immediate environment for any disulfide that can be attacked. If it attacks the PDI-substrate disulfide, the disulfide that was originally present in the substrate simply forms again, and the substrate is released without rearrangement (Scheme II, path 3). Alternatively, rearrangement occurs when the substrate thiol attacks a sulfur that is different from the one to which it was originally paired (Scheme II, path 1). Scanning the substrate favors the attack of PDI on the most reactive disulfide, and subsequent scanning by the substrate thiol is biased toward replacing the more reactive disulfide with one that is kinetically less reactive (Scheme II, path 1). For reversible thiol/disulfide exchange, the kinetics of disulfide formation may parallel thermodynamic stability (18, 19); consequently, scanning by PDI would favor the more stable arrangement of disulfides.
The second (more carboxyl-terminal) cysteine at each of the active sites of PDI provides yet another choice to be made in the covalent enzyme-substrate complex. Superimposed on the bias toward substrate rearrangements that lead to increasing disulfide stability, the active-site cysteine provides a reductive escape mechanism to extricate the enzyme from slowly rearranging complexes. If scanning by the substrate thiol is too slow, the second active-site cysteine can discharge the substrate by an intramolecular reaction between the two active-site sulfurs (Scheme II, path 2).
Intramolecular disulfide formation at the active site provides a clock to ensure that the enzyme does not become trapped in slowly rearranging, covalent complexes. The disulfide between glutathione and PDI is displaced by an intramolecular reaction between the two active-site cysteines with a half-time estimated at 20-100 ms (20). Thus, if kinetic scanning by the substrate does not succeed rapidly, wild-type PDI can escape from the complex by discharging the substrate. This escape mechanism provides another advantage; the offending substrate disulfide is reduced, which may make additional rearrangement/reoxidation pathways more accessible. The very low activity that is observed for single-cysteine active sites when intramolecular and intermolecular escape pathways are not available suggests that the dominant pathway for PDI-catalyzed rearrangement of sRNase involves reductive escape and reoxidation of the substrate rather than direct isomerization. The decision among reversal, rearrangement, and escape must be made multiple times, each time a covalent PDI-substrate complex is formed. Multiple cycles of kinetic scanning and reductive escape will ultimately lead to a native disulfide arrangement that is either resistant to the attack of PDI or in which partitioning is always toward reforming the original disulfide (Scheme II, path 3).