Identification of Two Amino Acids of the Human Cholecystokinin-A Receptor That Interact with the N-terminal Moiety of Cholecystokinin*

(Received for publication, October 16, 1996)

Karen Kennedy Dagger , Véronique Gigoux Dagger , Chantal Escrieut Dagger , Bernard Maigret §, Jean Martinez , Luis Moroder par , Daniel Fréhel **, Danielle Gully **, Nicole Vaysse Dagger and Daniel Fourmy Dagger Dagger Dagger

From the Dagger  INSERM U151, Institut Louis Bugnard, CHU Rangueil, Bat. L3, 31054 Toulouse Cedex, the § Laboratoire de Chimie Théorique, Université de Nancy, 54506 Vandoeuvre les Nancy,  CNRS URA 1845, Faculté de Pharmacie, 34060 Montpellier, France, par  Max Planck Intitut für Biochemie, 82143 Martinsried, Federal Republic of Germany, and the ** Sanofi-Recherche, 195 Route d'Espagne, 31036 Toulouse Cedex, France

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

A region between residues 38 and 42 of the human cholecystokinin-A (CCK-A) receptor was shown to be involved in the binding of CCK but not in that of JMV 179 and JMV 180, two peptides closely related to CCK (Kennedy, K., Escrieut, C., Dufresne, M., Clerc, P., Vaysse, N., and Fourmy, D. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 213, 845-852). In the present study, we have identified the residues of both the receptor and the ligand responsible for this differential binding. Residues Trp-39 and Gln-40 of the receptor were crucial for binding of the C-terminal nonapeptide of CCK as W39F and Q40N mutants demonstrated parallel decreases in both affinity and potency to induce accumulation of inositol phosphates (12.9- and 20.9-fold). The W39F and Q40N mutant receptors bound CCK analogues modified at their C-terminal end, including JMV 179 and JMV 180, as well as the C-terminal amidated heptapeptide of CCK, with identical affinities to the wild-type receptor. In contrast, W39F and Q40N mutants bound CCK octapeptide with the same decreased affinity as the CCK nonapeptide. The modeling of the CCK-A receptor and the docking of the peptide agonists [Thr,Nle]CCK9 and CCK-8 indicated that their N terminus was connected to the receptor through a strong bond network involving Trp-39 and Gln-40 thus confirming experimental data. These first molecular data identifying the agonist binding site of the human CCK-A receptor represent an important step toward the complete delineation of the agonist binding site and the understanding of the molecular mechanisms that govern differential activation of this receptor by CCK-related peptides.


INTRODUCTION

The peptide cholecystokinin (CCK)1 is found throughout the gastrointestinal system and the central nervous system where it functions as both a hormone and a neurotransmitter (1). CCK was originally isolated from porcine intestine as a 33-amino acid peptide and has subsequently been shown to exist physiologically in multiple forms derived from the cleavage of a 115-amino acid preprohormone (2, 3). The major physiological forms are CCK-58, CCK-39, CCK-33, and CCK-8, so designated by the number of amino acids counted backwards from the commonly shared C-terminal (1). Post-translational processing of CCK involves sulfation of the tyrosine at position 7 from the C-terminal and alpha -amidation of the C-terminal phenylalanine residue (1). Studies using chemically synthesized fragments have shown that the C-terminal sulfated, amidated heptapeptide (Fig. 1) is essential for full biological activity; however, fragments as small as the C-terminal pentapeptide which CCK has in common with the related peptide gastrin and the C-terminal tetrapeptide retain biological activity (4).


Fig. 1. Ligands of the CCK-A receptor. The synthetic agonist, [Thr,Nle]CCK-9, is closely related to the natural ligand CCK-8. However, the two methionines are substituted by Thr and Nle residues in order to avoid oxidation which leads to a loss of the biological activity of CCK. JMV 180 corresponds to the heptapeptide of CCK in which the phenylalanylamide residue is substituted by a phenylethyl ester. In JMV 179, the phenylalanylamide residue and the L-tryptophan are substituted by a phenylethyl ester and a D-tryptophan, respectively. The highly potent and selective non-peptide antagonist (1-[2-(4-(2-chlorophenyl)thiazol-2-yl)aminocarbonyl indoyl] acetic acid) (SR27,897) is from Sanofi Recherche.
[View Larger Version of this Image (19K GIF file)]


The actions of CCK are mediated by specific high affinity membrane receptors on target cells. These receptors have been characterized pharmacologically and biologically and are divided into two subtypes based on their affinities for CCK and gastrin (5, 6). The CCK-A subtype has an approximately 500-fold higher affinity for CCK than for gastrin, and the CCKB/G subtype has the same high affinity for both CCK and gastrin. The cloning of the cDNA coding for these receptors has shown them to belong to the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors that are characterized by seven transmembrane domains connected by intracellular and extracellular loops with an extracellular N-terminal and intracellular C-terminal (7, 8) (Fig. 2).


Fig. 2. Serpentine drawing of the human CCK-A receptor. The segment from Glu-38 to Ala-42 in the N-terminal region of the protein (drawn in square bracket), close to the first putative transmembrane domain, which has been previously identified as being involved in the binding of CCK was subjected to site-directed mutagenesis. In the inset is shown a sequence alignment indicating that all five amino acids except Pro-41 are conserved in the four species.
[View Larger Version of this Image (43K GIF file)]


The numerous physiological effects of CCK and its possible role in some pathological disorders have stimulated research into the design of selective peptide and non-peptide antagonists (9). Some molecules were synthetized on the basis of the importance of the C-terminal residues of CCK, in particular the carboxyamidated phenylalanine, for full biological activity. Two such molecules, JMV 180 and JMV 179, which are closely related analogues of the C-terminal heptapeptide of CCK (Fig. 1), have been used extensively in the characterization of CCK-A receptors. JMV 180 acts as an agonist or an antagonist according to the biological model and concentration of peptide used. For example JMV 180 acts as a CCK agonist to induce amylase release by pancreatic acini at nanomolar concentrations, while it acts as an antagonist on the CCK-induced phase of inhibition of amylase release at micromolar concentrations (11). Evidence exists from pancreatic acinar cells and transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells to show that the JMV 180 induces distinct signal transduction pathways from the natural agonist CCK through binding to the CCK-A receptor. However, the molecular basis for such distinct mechanisms of receptor activation by these two closely related agonists remains unknown and is still the object of considerable debate (12-16).

JMV 179 which differs from JMV 180 by the presence of a D-Trp in the place of the L-Trp is a full antagonist of the CCK-A receptor (17). Characterization of the rat pancreatic CCK-A receptor using this full peptide antagonist led to the identification of a truncated form of this receptor, with an altered pharmacology (18). Peptide mapping of the labeled truncated protein showed the receptor to be lacking in its extracellular N terminus. We recently constructed N-terminally truncated human CCK-A receptors that enabled us to identify a region of the N terminus, close to the first putative transmembrane domain that is essential for the high affinity interaction with CCK but was nonessential for the binding with JMV 179 and JMV 180 (19).

This observation and the fact that to date there is no information on the amino acids that compose the ligand binding site of the CCK-A receptor prompted us to mutate the conserved residues in the region 38-42 of the human CCK-A receptor. By doing so, we have been able to identify for the first time two residues, Trp-39 and Gln-40, that interact with CCK but not with JMV 179 and JMV 180. Screening of large variety of peptide analogues of CCK for binding to the mutated CCK-A receptors together with the three-dimensional modeling of both the receptor and the receptor-ligand complex enabled us to demonstrate that the two residues Trp-39 and Gln-40 interact with the N-terminal region of CCK octa- and nonapeptides that are not present in JMV 179 and JMV 180.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

The C-terminal nonapeptide of CCK, [Thr28,Ahx31]CCK-25-33 ([Thr,Nle]-CCK-9), the heptapeptide [Nle]CCK-7, the octapeptide CCK-8, and the decapeptide CCK-10 were synthesized by Luis Moroder (Max Planck Institut für Biochimie, München, Germany) (20). The other C-terminal analogues of CCK, namely JMV 170, 179, 180, 195, 211, 262, and 295 and Boc-[Nle]CCK-7 (see Table II for complete primary structures), were synthesized by Jean Martinez's group. (1-[2-(4-(2-Chlorophenyl)thiazol-2-yl) aminocarbonyl indoyl] acetic acid) (SR27,897) and its tritiated derivative, [3H]SR27,897 (41 Ci/mmol), were donated by Sanofi Research (Toulouse, France) (21). 125INa was from Amersham, Les Ulis, France. [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 and JMV 179 were conjugated with Bolton-Hunter reagent, purified, and radioiodinated as described previously (22). The specific activity of radioiodinated peptides was 1600-2000 Ci/mmol. Oligonucleotide primers were from Bioprobe Systems (Montreuil, France). All other chemicals were obtained from commercial sources.

Table II.

CCK-related peptides Receptors
Wild-type
W39F
Q40N
Ki, nM (n) Ki, nM (n) F Ki, nM (n) F

Arg-Asp-Tyr(SO3H)-Thr-Gly-Trp-Nle-Asp-Phe-CONH2 [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 0.24  ± 0.01 (4) 3.1  ± 0.8 (5) 12.9 5.0  ± 1.1 (5) 20.8
Boc-Tyr(SO3H)-Nle-Gly-Trp-Nle-Asp-DPhe-CONH2 JMV 203 47  ± 17 (3) 56  ± 22 (3) 1.2 54  ± 20 (3) 1.1
Boc-Tyr(SO3H)-Nle-Gly-DTrp-Nle-Asp-O-CH2-CH2-phi JMV 179 4.8  ± 0.1 (3) 4.8  ± 0.2 (3) 1.0 4.9  ± 0.1 (3) 1.0
Boc-Tyr(SO3H)-Nle-Gly-Trp-Nle-Asp-O-CH2-CH2-phi JMV 180 6.0  ± 0.8 (3) 5.9  ± 1.2 (3) 1.0 6.2  ± 1.5 (3) 1.0
Boc-Tyr(SO3H)-Nle-Gly-Trp-Nle-Asp-CH2-CH2-phi JMV 170 13.3  ± 1.1 (3) 12.1  ± 1.3 (3) 0.9 14.3  ± 1.6 (3) 1.1
Boc-Tyr(SO3H)-Nle-Gly-Trp-Nle-Asp-Phe-OOCH3 JMV 295 22.8  ± 8.2 (3) 32.2  ± 11.3 (3) 1.4 44.3  ± 7.2 (3) 1.9
Boc-Tyr(SO3H)-Nle-Gly-Trp-Nle-Asp-beta Ala-CONH2 JMV 211 768  ± 150 (3) 589  ± 68 (3) 0.8 768  ± 125 (3) 1.0
Boc-Tyr(SO3H)-Nle-Gly-Trp-Nle-Asp-CONH2 JMV 195 397  ± 43 (3) 467  ± 61 (3) 1.2 414  ± 49 (3) 1.0
Boc-Tyr(SO3H)-Nle-Gly-Trp-Nle-Asp-Phe-CONH2 Boc-[Nle]CCK-7 0.75  ± 0.25 (3) 1.15  ± 0.80 (3) 1.5 0.86  ± 0.33 (3) 1.1
Tyr(SO3H)-Nle-Gly-Trp-Nle-Asp-Phe-CONH2 [Nle]CCK-7 2.8  ± 0.8 (3) 2.5  ± 0.9 (3) 0.9 3.3  ± 1.5 (3) 1.2
Asp-Tyr(SO3H)-Met-Gly-Trp-Met-Asp-Phe-CONH2 CCK-8 0.27  ± 0.02 (3) 3.2  ± 2.1 (5) 11.8 4.7  ± 1.8 (5) 17.4

Strategy for Amino Acid Exchange

We have previously identified, through the construction of receptors truncated to varying degrees in their N terminus, a region of the human CCK-A receptor, amino acids 38-42 inclusive, that is essential for the high affinity interaction with the agonist [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 (19). Our initial aim was to identify the individual amino acid(s) in this region that interact(s) with the CCK. We decided to use site-directed mutagenesis of evolutionarily conserved amino acids to assess their involvement in the interaction with CCK. Alignment of the sequences of all CCK-A receptors cloned to date showed that all five amino acids in this region are conserved between human, guinea pig, and rabbit and that the only difference in the rat receptor is a serine residue at position 41 compared with a proline in the human, guinea pig, and rabbit receptors (Fig. 2). Assuming that the binding site of the natural ligand is most likely to be conserved during evolution, we mutated all the amino acids in this region with the exception of the proline which is likely to have an important structural role rather than a direct involvement in binding. We started with conservative mutations of the residues: Glu-38 right-arrow Asp, Trp-39 right-arrow Phe, Gln-40 right-arrow Asn, and Ala-42 right-arrow Val. In a second step, the amino acids that were found to be critical for CCK binding were exchanged by chemically distinct residues:Trp-39 right-arrow Ile and Gln-40 right-arrow Glu.

Site-directed Mutagenesis

Site-directed mutagenesis was carried out using a Chameleon 228 Double-stranded Site-directed Mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) following the manufacturer's instructions. The protocol is based on the method of mutagenesis by unique site elimination (23). Mutations were introduced into the human CCK-A receptor cDNA cloned into the pRFENeo vector (19) using mutagenic primers based on the published human CCK-A receptor cDNA sequence (7, 8). Selection primers mutated a unique SmaI restriction site in the cDNA to a unique NruI site and vice versa. Plasmids were isolated from individual colonies and screened for the incorporation of the desired mutations by restriction site analysis. The mutations were confirmed by sequencing either manually, using the Double-stranded DNA Cycle Sequencing System (Life Technologies, Inc.) or on an automated sequencer (Applied Biosystem).

Transient Transfection of COS-7 Cells and Membrane Preparation

COS-7 cells (1.2 × 106) were plated in 10-cm culture dishes and grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 5% fetal calf serum in a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C. After an overnight incubation, cells were transfected with 2 µg/plate of the pRFENeo vectors containing the cDNA for the wild-type or mutated CCK-A receptors, using a modified DEAE-dextran method as described previously (24). Approximately 65 h post-transfection the cells were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline, pH 6.95, scraped from the plate in 10 mM Hepes buffer, pH 7.0, containing 0.01% soybean trypsin inhibitor, 0.1% bacitracin, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and frozen in liquid N2. After thawing at 37 °C, the cells were subjected to another cycle of freeze/thawing and then centrifuged at 25,000 × g for 20 min. The membrane pellet was resuspended in 50 mM Hepes buffer, pH 7.0, containing 115 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.01% soybean trypsin inhibitor, 0.1% bacitracin, 1 mM EGTA, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (binding buffer), aliquoted, and stored at -80 °C until use. Membrane protein concentrations were determined by the Bradford method (25) using the Bio-Rad protein assay kit.

Receptor Binding Studies

Isolated plasma membranes from COS-7 cells (3-10 µg protein) were incubated in binding buffer containing 0.5 mg/ml bovine serum albumin for 90 min at 25 °C (steady state conditions) with 60-100 pM 125I-BH-[Thr,Nle]CCK-9 or 240 pM [3H]SR27,897 in the presence or absence of competing agonist or antagonist. The binding reaction was stopped by the addition of 500 µl of ice-cold binding buffer, and bound radioligand was separated from free by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. Pellets were washed and centrifuged once more, and the radioactivity was directly counted for the radioiodinated ligands or the pellet was resuspended in 0.1 M NaOH and added to scintillant and counted for the tritiated radioligand. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 10 µM unlabeled ligand and was less than 10% of total binding. Binding data from at least three separate experiments from different batches of transfected cells were analyzed using the EBDA LIGAND program (26). Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.

Assay of Inositol Phosphates

To measure the accumulation of inositol phosphates, COS-7 cells were transfected and cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (3 ml) containing serum in 25-cm2 plates in the presence of 2 Ci/ml myo-2-[3H]inositol (Amersham Corp.) for 48-72 h. The day of the experiments, the medium was replaced by serum- and inositol-free medium, and cells were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Cells were washed with serum- and inositol-free medium and were again incubated for 10 min at 37 °C in the presence of 10 mM LiCl. Finally, cells were stimulated for 20 min with or without [Thr,Nle]CCK-9, JMV 180, JMV 179, or SR27,897 at various concentrations. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 10% HClO4, and inositol phosphates were extracted on AmprepTM mini-columns (Amersham Corp.) following the manufacturer's instructions.

Computer Modeling of the Receptor

The molecular model of the human CCK-A receptor was constructed using the transmembrane helical positions found in the bacteriorhodopsin crystal structure as a starting point for the optimization procedures and using successively the human rhodopsin and the beta 2-adrenergic receptor for sequence alignment procedures. Extracellular and intracellular loops connecting the transmembrane helices were then added to the preliminary 7-helix bundle and modeled with the use of a simulated annealing procedure. The entire system was relaxed, with the possible translation and rotation movements of individual transmembrane helices taken into account. Details of the building of such models have been presented elsewhere, for example for the AT1A receptor (27). The homology, energy minimization, and dynamics steps were produced with the use of the Biosym molecular modeling software. Molecular modeling was performed independently from the experimental work to avoid any bias in subsequent analysis of the results.


RESULTS

Identification of the Residues and Chemical Functions of the Human CCK-A Receptor Important for the High Affinity Binding of CCK

The human wild-type and mutant CCK-A receptors were transiently expressed in COS-7 cells (Table I). We first determined the binding properties of the wild-type receptor using both the agonist radioligand 125I-BH-[Thr,Nle]CCK-9 and the non-peptide antagonist radioligand [3H]SR27,897. Scatchard analysis of the binding results obtained with 125I-BH-[Thr,Nle]-CCK-9 demonstrated two classes of binding sites, a high affinity site with a Kd of 0.34 ± 0.01 nM and a maximal binding capacity of 0.43 ± 0.06 pmol/mg proteins, and a low affinity site with a Kd of 109 ± 56 nM and a maximal binding capacity of 5.6 ± 0.4 pmol/mg proteins. In contrast, binding of the selective non-peptide antagonist [3H]SR27,897 revealed a single class of binding sites with a Kd of 1.55 ± 0.15 nM and a binding capacity of 15.5 ± 1.5 pmol/mg proteins (not illustrated).

Table I.

Receptors [Thr,Nle]CCK-9
SR 27,897
Maximum binding capacities, Bmax
Ki (n) F Ki (n) F

nM nM pmol/mg protein
CCKA wild-type 0.24  ± 0.01 (4) 1.56  ± 0.15 (3) 2.0 -15.2
E38D 0.28  ± 0.03 (3) 1.1 1.94  ± 0.30 (3) 1.2 1.7 -10.2
W39F 3.15  ± 0.80 (5) 12.9 1.47  ± 0.19 (3) 0.9 3.8 -16.0
Q40N 5.04  ± 1.10 (5) 20.9 1.80  ± 0.25 (3) 1.1 2.3 -11.8
A42V 0.25  ± 0.03 (3) 1.0 1.28  ± 0.30 (3) 0.8 3.8 -7.4
W39I 2.10  ± 0.60 (3) 8.7 2.00  ± 0.30 (3) 1.3 1.3 -3.2
Q40E 0.66  ± 0.27 (3) 2.7 1.55  ± 0.18 (3) 1.0 1.8 -5.4

The effects of mutations on the pharmacological properties of the mutant receptors were studied by competition binding experiments. The two mutations E38D and A42V had no effect on the binding of [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 nor on the binding of the antagonist SR27,897 (Table I). However, the mutants W39F and Q40N demonstrated significantly decreased binding for [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 (Fig. 3 and Table I). The exchange of Trp-39 for a Phe caused a 11.9-fold decrease in the affinity for [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 without affecting the affinity of the non-peptide antagonist, and the exchange of Gln-40 for an Asn produced a 19.2-fold decrease in the affinity for [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 while the affinity for SR27,897 remained unchanged (Table I and Fig. 3). For both mutants W39F and Q40N, Scatchard analysis of agonist binding revealed two classes of binding sites having the following dissociation constants: W39F mutant, Kd1 = 3.8 ± 0.9 nM, Kd2 = 1330 ± 550 nM; Q40N mutant, Kd1 = 6.3 ± 1.4 nM, Kd2 = 1283 ± 480 nM (not illustrated). These dissociation constants indicate that the W39F and Q40N mutations decreased the affinity of [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 for both the high affinity and low affinity sites to the same extent.


Fig. 3. Binding of the agonist [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 to the wild-type, W39F, and Q40N human CCK-A receptors. Membranes were prepared from COS-7 cells transiently transfected with the cDNA encoding the wild-type and mutated receptors. The radioligand used was 125I-BH-[Thr,Nle]CCK-9. Scatchard analysis of 125I-BH-[Thr,Nle]CCK-9 binding for the wild-type receptor demonstrated two classes of binding sites having dissociation constants (Kd) of 0.34 and 109 nM, respectively. Scatchard plots of 125I-BH-[Thr,Nle]CCK-9 binding data for the mutated receptors also demonstrated two classes of binding sites.
[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]


Since interactions of CCK with Trp-39 are likely to involve hydrophobic interactions with the indole moiety, we verified that such an interaction was completely eliminated by the exchange of a tryptophan to a phenylalanine by performing the mutation Trp-39 right-arrow Ile. This new W39I mutant bound the agonist [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 with an affinity close to the W39F mutant (Kd, 2.1 ± 0.60 nM versus 3.10 ± 0.30 nM) suggesting that any contribution to the affinity of the agonist ligand was already eliminated by the substitution of the indole ring of Trp-39 by the aromatic ring of Phe-39. This suggested that the integrity of the indole ring at site Trp-39 in the human CCK-A receptor was in fact required for the full interaction of [Thr,Nle]CCK-9.

Interactions of the CCK with Gln-40 are likely to involve hydrogen bonding, and the mutation Q40N consisted only in a reduction of the length of the side chain without changing the functionality. We therefore tested the possibility of restoring the affinity of the mutant receptor by exchanging the Asn for a Glu, thus restoring the length of the side chain and maintaining the possibility of hydrogen-bonded interactions. The Q40E mutant bound [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 with an affinity 7.6-fold higher than the Q40N mutant and only 2.7-fold lower than the wild-type CCK-A receptor. Affinity of the non-peptide antagonist SR27,897 for W39I and Q40E mutants remained unchanged compared with the wild-type CCK-A receptor (Table I).

Functionality of the Mutant Receptors

To analyze the effects of the mutations of Trp-39 and Gln-40 on the functional coupling of the human CCK-A receptor, we first studied the dependence of agonist binding on activation of G proteins by GTP[gamma S] a non-hydrolyzable analogue of GTP. Binding of the agonist 125I-BH-[Thr,Nle]CCK-9 to the high affinity sites of the wild-type, W39F, and Q40N receptors was inhibited in the same manner by GTP[gamma S] (IC50, 2.1 nM, not shown), whereas binding of the non-peptide antagonist [3H]SR27,897 was unaffected. We then measured [Thr,Nle]CCK-9-induced accumulation of inositol phosphates. As illustrated in Fig. 4, [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 induced a dose-dependent stimulation of the production of inositol phosphates to a maximal increase of 8-10-fold in COS-7 cells transfected with the wild-type and mutant receptors. However, the concentrations giving half-maximal responses (kact) were significantly higher for the W39F and Q40N mutants (15.0 ± 1.8 and 22.6 ± 2.1 nM, n = 3) than for the wild-type CCK-A receptor (1.0 ± 0.5 nM, n = 4). Comparison of these values with the Kd values for binding of [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 to the corresponding receptors indicated that the increase in kact values obtained for both the W39F and Q40N mutants paralleled the loss in [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 binding affinities. Indeed, Ki/kact ratios were 0.23, 0.21, and 0.22 for the wild-type, W39F, and Q40N receptors, respectively, indicating that the two mutant receptors were as effectively coupled to phospholipase C as is the wild-type CCK-A receptor.


Fig. 4. [Thr,Nle]CCK-9-induced accumulation of inositol phosphates in COS-7 cells transiently transfected with the wild-type and W39F, Q40N mutants. Transfected cells were stimulated for 20 min by the agonist [Thr,Nle]CCK-9. Results are expressed as percent of maximum stimulation by COS-7 expressing the wild-type receptor (mean of three experiments performed on separately transfected cells).
[View Larger Version of this Image (20K GIF file)]


The two CCK-related analogues JMV 179 and JMV 180 as well as the non-peptide compound SR27,897 tested at concentrations of up to 1 µM did not stimulate the production of inositol phosphates in COS-7 cells expressing the wild-type or the mutated receptors (not illustrated).

Identification of the Residues of CCK Interacting with Residues Trp-39 and Gln-40 of the CCK-A Receptor

In a previous study, we showed that deletion of the first 42 extracellular amino acids of the CCK-A receptor did not affect the binding affinities for JMV 180 and JMV 179 which are structurally related CCK analogues (Fig. 1). This observation and the data presented here on the effects of mutating Trp-39 and Gln-40 on the binding of [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 led us to attempt to determine which amino acid(s) and chemical function(s) present in [Thr,Nle]CCK-9, but absent in JMV 179 and 180, were likely to interact with Trp-39 and Gln-40 in the CCK-A receptor. Since the primary structure of JMV 180 differs from that of [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 by the substitution of the C-terminal amidated phenylalanyl residue by a phenylethyl ester, and by the presence of the blocking group butyloxycarbonyl instead of amino acids Arg and Asp, we screened a series of CCK analogues modified at the C terminus or varying in their N terminus by the length of the peptide chain, for binding at the wild-type, W39F, and Q40N receptors. We postulated that only peptides containing residues capable of interacting with the amino acids Trp-39 and Gln-40 of the receptor would bind to the mutated receptors W39F and Q40N with decreased affinities compared with the wild-type receptor. The results of these binding experiments are shown in Table II.

JMV 180 as well as JMV 179 bound with identical affinities to the wild-type and W39F and Q40N mutant receptors, a result that is in agreement with our previous findings (19). Peptide analogues which had an N terminus identical to JMV 180 and JMV 179 and had their C-terminal amidated phenylalanine modified (JMV 170, 211, 203, 295) or absent (JMV 195) bound with identical affinities to the wild-type and mutant receptors. Furthermore, the agonist Boc-[Nle]CCK-7 and [Nle]CCK-7 which have the native amidated phenylalanine at the C terminus as does [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 but have a sulfated tyrosine at the N terminus also bound with identical affinities to the wild-type and mutant receptors. These data suggested that neither the lateral phenyl ring of the phenylalanine nor the C-terminal amide were interacting with Trp-39 and Gln-40 in the CCK-A receptor.

In contrast, CCK peptides that had a peptide chain extended backwards from the sulfated tyrosine, which is peptides longer than the heptapeptide of CCK, and their C-terminal end intact bound with different affinities to the wild-type and mutated CCK-A receptors. Indeed, compared with the wild-type receptor, the affinity of CCK-8 was decreased 11.8-fold for the W39F mutant and 17.4-fold for the Q40N mutant, and the affinity of [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 was decreased 12.9-fold for the W39F mutant and 20.9-fold for the Q40N mutant suggesting that residues located at the N terminus of these peptides were likely to be interacting with residues Trp-39 and Gln-40 of the binding site of the CCK-A receptor.

Comparison of the affinity of the wild-type receptor for CCK analogues indicated that the carboxyamidated phenylalanine contributes 1660-fold to the affinity of [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 and -CCK-8, whereas the Asp residue in CCK-8 and the fragment Arg-Asp in [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 contribute identically 10-12-fold to the affinity of [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 and -CCK-8. This observation agrees with previous data that the CCK-7 is 10 times less potent for stimulation of amylase secretion at CCK-A receptors (4).

Molecular Model for the Interaction Between the N-terminal Moiety of CCK and Residues Trp-39 and Gln-40 of the Human CCK-A Receptor

The positioning of the CCK peptide in the modeled CCK-A receptor was achieved using a docking model already proposed for the CCK-B/gastrin receptor (28, 29). In this model, the C-terminal moiety of the CCK-related ligands was placed in the middle of the receptor transmembrane region, whereas the N-terminal part was positioned in its extracellular region near the entrance of the receptor pocket. According to the model illustrated here for the docking of [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 in the CCK-A receptor, it appears that the N-terminal residues of [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 are connected to the receptor through a strong hydrogen bond and salt bridge network (Fig. 5). As previously demonstrated by circular dichroism (30), intramolecular salt bridges are found inside the ligand itself connecting together on one hand the guanidinium and carboxylate groups of the side chains of Arg-1 and Asp-2 and on the other hand the Tyr-3 sulfate and the N-terminal ammonium. These groups are also involved in intermolecular interactions with receptor residues. Asp-106 forms a salt bridge between its side chain and Arg-1 side chain of [Thr,Nle]CCK-9. Gln-40 forms H bonds between its NH amide side chain and the Asp-2 side chain of [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 and between its carbonyl side chain and the N-terminal ammonium of the ligand. Trp-39 forms H bonds between its backbone carbonyl and the ligand N-terminal ammonium and between its backbone NH and the Tyr-3 sulfate oxygen of [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 (Fig. 6).


Fig. 5. Stereoview of the computer-generated three-dimensional model of the human CCK-A receptor-[Thr,Nle]CCK-9 complex. The figure shows a side view of the receptor (Calpha chain trace drawn in green) with the agonist ligand (represented in orange) docked in its binding site. The upper part of the figure corresponds to the extracellular domain of the receptor containing the N-terminal tail and the three loops connecting the transmembrane domains. The lower part corresponds to the intracellular domain of the receptor containing the C-terminal domain and the three intracellular loops.
[View Larger Version of this Image (39K GIF file)]



Fig. 6. Molecular model for the anchoring of the N-terminal end of [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 in the human CCK-A receptor. After computer modeling of the receptor, docking of the peptide ligand was achieved as described under "Experimental Procedures." The figure shows four amino acids of the receptor (in green), Glu-38, Trp-39, and Gln-40 located in the N-terminal extracellular domain close to the top of the first transmembrane segment and Asp-106 located in the first extracellular loop; and the four C-terminal amino acids of the ligand (numbered in orange), Arg-1, Asp-2, Tyr(SO3H)-3, and Thr-4. Interactions between chemical functions of these amino acids are represented by dotted lines.
[View Larger Version of this Image (28K GIF file)]


Moreover, the correct positioning of the ligand Tyr-3 side chain and, as a consequence, of the whole of the N-terminal ligand moiety in the receptor is ensured by the position of the Trp-39 side chain; this side chain is maintained in the correct position in the receptor by an intramolecular H bond between the Trp-39 indole and the Glu-38 side chain and by an aromatic T-shaped interaction between the side chains of Trp-39 and Phe-198 residues. Owing to the restrained flexibility of its side chain, Trp-39 is involved in another T-shaped aromatic interaction with the Tyr-3 aromatic ring of [Thr,Nle]CCK-9. Such aromatic-aromatic interactions have proven to be very important for the stabilization of proteins or in ligand-protein interactions (31).

From the above model, residues Gln-40 and Trp-39 appear to be key residues for the binding of the agonists [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 and CCK-8. Data with W39F and Q40N which demonstrated a parallel loss in both the binding affinity of these receptor mutants for [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 and their potency to induce inositol phosphate production are in perfect agreement with the data from the molecular modeling. Indeed, in the model, the exchange of the Gln-40 residue by an Asn one which shortens the side chain of the residue strongly reduces the possibility of interactions with the carboxylate side chains of Asp-2. Exchange of Gln-40 to Glu also yields decreased possibilities of docking due to electrostatic repulsive interactions between the two negative charges born by the carboxylate side chains of Asp-2 and Glu-40. The same situation is observed with the mutations of Trp-39 to Phe and Ile; when the Trp-39 side chain is replaced by that of the Phe residue, the Phe side chain moves from a T-shaped to a stacked interaction with the aromatic ring of Phe-198, making an unfavorable positioning of the ligand Tyr-3 side chain owing to unfavorable steric interactions between the sulfate oxygens and the Phe-39 aromatic ring. When the Trp-39 planar side chain is replaced by a more bulky hydrophobic side chain such as the Ile, our docking model is modified so that the salt bridge and hydrogen bond network as described above are less favorable.

The model for the docking of the agonist peptides in the CCK-A receptor which is illustrated for [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 is in good agreement with binding data for CCK-8 and CCK-7. Binding experiments demonstrated that mutations of Trp-39 and Gln-40 induced a similar decrease in the affinity for [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 and CCK-8, whereas no decrease was observed for CCK-7. It therefore appears that the overall energy involved in the interactions between the N-terminal ammonium and the two adjacent amino acids Arg-Asp of [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 and amino acids Trp-39 and Gln-40 of the receptor is nearly the same as that between the N-terminal ammonium and the Asp residue in CCK-8. Elimination of the Asp residue as in CCK-7 completely abolishes the possibility of interaction of the ligand with Trp-39 and Gln-40 (Fig. 6).


DISCUSSION

The human CCK-A receptor mediates important biological functions of CCK such as the regulation of appetite, the stimulation of exocrine pancreatic secretion, and gallbladder motility (7, 8). The cDNA for the receptor was cloned 3 years ago; however, to date, there exist no molecular data on the amino acids of the receptor that are involved in ligand binding. We have recently shown that a region of the receptor between amino acids 38 and 42 was essential for the high affinity interaction with the full agonist CCK; this observation was the starting point for studies to identify the individual amino acids involved in agonist binding (19).

Using site-directed mutagenesis of evolutionarily conserved amino acids, we have been able to identify two amino acids of the human CCK-A receptor, Trp-39 and Gln-40 which, when mutated to other amino acids of the same chemical function, lead to a loss in the affinity of the receptor for the full agonists [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 and CCK-8. The loss in affinity for [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 of the mutant receptors did not result in a loss in the biological efficacy of [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 at the receptors as shown by the identical maximum production of inositol phosphates; however, the decrease in affinity was accompanied by a similar loss in the biological potency as shown by parallel shifts in the dose-response curves for inositol phosphate production. This observation, and the fact that the binding of other peptide and non-peptide ligands was unaffected by the mutations, suggests that mutation of these two amino acids directly affects a region of the binding site for CCK on the receptor without affecting the overall integrity of the receptor. Truncation of the CCK-A receptor while affecting the binding of [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 did not affect the binding of the CCK analogues JMV 179 and JMV 180 suggesting that these last molecules do not interact with this region of the receptor (19). This was confirmed by the mutagenesis studies presented here; JMV 180 and JMV 179 are very similar structurally to [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 but do not interact with Trp-39 and Gln-40. This observation opened up the possibility of using a combination of the screening of a series of other CCK analogues and carrying out further mutations to identify the residues and chemical functions involved in the interaction between [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 and Trp-39 and Gln-40. Screening of a series of CCK analogues structurally modified at their N and C termini led to the observation that only peptides that were N-terminally extended further than the sulfated tyrosine residue were sensitive to mutations at residues 39 and 40 of the receptor, suggesting that it is in fact the N-terminal ammonium and Arg-1-Asp-2 residues of [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 and the N-terminal ammonium and Asp-1 of CCK-8 that interact with Trp-39 and Gln-40. Molecular modeling of the CCK-A receptor and the docking of the agonists [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 and CCK-8 in the receptor gave a model which suggests that Trp-39 and Gln-40 of the CCK-A receptor are connected to the N-terminal region of the agonist ligand via a network of hydrogen bonds and salt bridges. The results obtained from the molecular modeling confirm those obtained experimentally.

Further support for our findings lies in the good agreement between the effect of elimination, by site-directed mutagenesis, of a specific point of interaction in the receptor binding site, namely residues Trp-39 and Gln-40, and the effect of the elimination in the ligand of the residues, in this case Arg-Asp or Asp, involved in the interaction with the wild-type receptor.

The fact that JMV 179 and JMV 180 do not contain N-terminal residues capable of interacting with Trp-39 and Gln-40 may explain in part that they bind with lower affinities to the receptor than [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 and CCK-8. It is likely that JMV 179 and JMV 180 still share a minimum part of their binding site with the corresponding peptide agonists. The results from this study do not allow us to draw such a conclusion, but it is worth noting that the binding of the highly selective non-peptide CCK-A receptor antagonist SR27,897 was also unaffected by mutations of residues 39 and 40, indicating that these amino acids are not involved in the recognition and binding of this ligand. Such a minimal overlapping between the binding site for agonist and non-peptide antagonist is now well established for many G protein-coupled receptors (32-33).

Furthermore, our data lead to the conclusion that the differences in N-terminal structure between [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 and JMV 179 and 180 and therefore lack of interactions at Trp-39 and Gln-40 are not responsible for the absence of inositol phosphate production by these two peptides as observed in this study. Indeed, if such structural differences at the N terminus of the peptides were the cause of absence of inositol production by the wild-type receptor under stimulation by JMV 180 and JMV 179, we would expect that the two receptors mutated at positions Trp-39 and Gln-40 would not respond to a stimulation by [Thr,Nle]CCK-9. This was not the case. Therefore, it is highly probable that the differences in intracellular signaling previously observed between JMV 180 and the full agonist CCK are not due to stuctural differences at the N terminus of the peptides (10, 12-16). Further studies concentrating on the identification of the residue(s) of the CCK-A receptor that interact(s) with the C-terminal amidated phenylalanine residue of CCK shown to be vital for agonist activity are necessary.

This study shows the importance of interactions with residues located in the N-terminal region of the CCK-A receptor in the binding of the natural agonist CCK. Interestingly, the location of at least a part of the binding site for CCK on the extracellular surface of the CCK-A receptor which is suggested by the data from both the site-directed mutagenesis and the molecular modeling shows similarity to the binding sites of receptors for other peptides such as the AT1 receptor (34), the endothelin-B receptor (35), the neurokinin-1 receptor (36), and the neurotensin receptor (37) in contrast to those for the biogenic amines that have been demonstrated to be exclusively within the transmembrane domains (33, 38, 39).

In the absence of any other data on the CCK-A receptor, it is interesting to compare our mutagenesis results with data on the CCK-B/gastrin receptor, as the two receptor subtypes have the same high affinity for the agonists CCK-8 and [Thr,Nle]CCK-9 (5, 6). No mutagenesis experiments involving the N-terminal region of the CCK-B/gastrin receptor have been reported; however, the importance of this region was demonstrated through the discovery of a splice variant that was deleted of the N-terminal extracellular region and the upper part of the first transmembrane domain and had an altered pharmacology (40). In addition, a segment of five amino acids in the second intracellular loop of the CCK-B/gastrin receptor was shown to be essential for the high affinity of this receptor for the natural peptide agonist gastrin, suggesting that determinants of the binding site of the CCK-B/gastrin receptor are situated within the extracellular domains (41). In contrast, mutations along transmembrane domains of the CCK-B/gastrin receptor that were shown to affect binding affinity for non-peptide antagonists did not significantly affect the affinity for agonist ligands (28, 29, 42).

In conclusion, using site-directed mutagenesis of the CCK-A receptor, analysis of binding affinity, and biological potency of C- and N-terminally modified CCK analogues and molecular modeling, we have identified two amino acids Trp-39 and Gln-40 of the agonist binding site of the receptor. We have also demonstrated that these two amino acids interact with the N-terminal moiety of CCK. These findings represent an important step toward the complete delineation of the agonist binding site of the CCK-A receptor and in the identification of the interactions involved, and toward the subsequent understanding of the molecular mechanisms that govern differential activation of this receptor by CCK-related peptides.


FOOTNOTES

*   The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger Dagger    To whom correspondence should be addressed: INSERM U151, CHU de Rangueil, Bat L3, 31054 Toulouse Cedex, France. Tel.: 33 61 32 24 04; Fax: 33 62 26 40 12; E-mail: Daniel.Fourmy{at}rangueil.inserm.fr.
1    The abbreviations used are: CCK, cholecystokinin; GTPgamma S. guanosine 5'-O-(thiotriphosphate).

REFERENCES

  1. Rehfeld, J. F., and Van Soulinge, W. W. (1994) Adv. Cancer Res. 63, 295-347 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Mutt, V., and Jorpes, J. E. (1967) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 26, 392-397 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Deschenes, R. J., Lorenz, L. J., Haun, R. S., Roos, B. A., Collier, K. J., and Dixon, J. E. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81, 726-730 [Abstract]
  4. Jensen, R. T., Lemp, G. F., and Gardner, J. D. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 5554-5559 [Free Full Text]
  5. Poirot, S., Dufresne, M., Vaysse, N., and Fourmy, D. (1993) Eur. J. Biochem. 215, 513-529 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Wank, S. A. (1995) Am. J. Physiol. 32, G628-G646
  7. Ulrich, C. D., Ferber, I., Holicky, E., Hadac, E., Buell, G., and Miller, L. J. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 193, 204-211 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. de Weerth, A., Pisegna, J. R., Huppi, K., and Wank, S. A. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 194, 811-818 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Woodruff, G. N., and Hughes, J. (1991) Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 31, 469-501 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Williams, J. A., and Blevins, G. T., Jr. (1993) Physiol. Rev. 73, 701-723 [Free Full Text]
  11. Galas, M. C., Lignon, M. F., Rodriguez, M., Mendre, C., and Martinez, J. (1988) Am. J. Physiol. 254, G176-G182 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Matozaki, T., Goke, B., Tsunoda, Y., Rodriguez, M., Martinez, J., and Williams, J. A. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 6247-6254 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Yule, D. I., and Williams, J. A. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 13830-13835 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Saluja, A. K., Dawra, R. K., Lerch, M. M., and Steer, M. L. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 11202-11207 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Yule, D. Y., Tseng, M.-J., Williams, J. A., and Logsdon, C. D. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 265, G999-G1004
  16. Tsunoda, Y., and Owyang, C. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 269, G435-G444 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Lignon, M.-F., Galas, M.-C., Rodriguez, M., Laur, J., Aumelas, A., and Martinez, J. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 7226-7231 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Silvente-Poirot, S., Escrieut, C., Dufresne, M., Martinez, J., Bouisson, M., Vaysse, N., and Fourmy, D. (1994) Mol. Pharmacol. 45, 599-607 [Abstract]
  19. Kennedy, K., Escrieut, C., Dufresne, M., Clerc, P., Vaysse, N., and Fourmy, D. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 213, 845-852 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Moroder, L., Wilschonwitz, C., Geimeiner, G., Gorhring, W., Knof, S., Schorg, R., Thamm, P., Gardner, J. D., Solomon, T. E., and Wunsch, E. (1981) Hoppe-Seyler's Z. Physiol. Chem. 362, 929-942 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Gully, D., Fréhel, D., Marcy, C., Spinazzé, A., Lespy, L., Neliat, G., Maffrand, J. P., and Le Fur, G. (1993) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 232, 13-19 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Fourmy, D., Lopez, P., Poirot, S., Jimenez, J., Dufresne, M., Moroder, M., Powers, S. P., and Vaysse, N. (1989) Eur. J. Biochem. 185, 397-403 [Abstract]
  23. Deng, W. P., and Nickoloff, J. A. (1992) Anal. Biochem. 200, 81-88 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Prats, H., Kaghad, M., Prats, A. C., Klagsbrun, M., Lélias, J. M., Liauzun, P., Chalon, P., Tauber, J. P., Amalric, F., Smith, J. A., and Caput, D. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 1836-1840 [Abstract]
  25. Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Munson, P. J., and Rodbard, D. (1980) Anal. Biochem. 107, 220-239 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Joseph, M.-P., Maigret, B., Bonnafous, J.-C., Marie, J., and Scheraga, H. A. (1995) J. Protein Chem. 14, 381-398 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Jagerschmidt, A., Guillaume, N., Goudreau, N., Maigret, B., and Roques, B. (1996) Mol. Pharmacol. 48, 783-789 [Abstract]
  29. Jagerschmidt, A., Guillaume-Rousselet, N., Vikland, M.-L., Goudreau, N., Maigret, B., and Roques, B. (1996) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 296, 97-106 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Moroder, L., Romano, R., Weyher, E., Svoboda, M., and Christophe, J. (1993) Z. Naturforsch. 48, 1419-1430
  31. Hunter, C. A., Singh, J., and Thornton, J. M. (1991) J. Mol. Biol. 218, 837-846 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Strader, C. D., Fong, T. M., Graziano, M. P., and Tota, M. (1995) FASEB J. 9, 745-754 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Schwartz, T. W., and Rosenkilde, M. M. (1996) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 17, 213-216 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Hjorth, S. A., Schambye, H. T., Greenlee, W. J., and Schwartz, T. W. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 30953-30959 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Takasuka, T., Sakurai, T., Goto, K., Furuichi, Y., and Watanabe, T. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 7509-7513 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Fong, T. M., Huang, R. R. C., and Strader, C. D. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 25664-25667 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Labbé-Jullié, C., Botto, J.-M., Mas, V., Chabry, J., Mazella, J., Vincent, J. P., Gully, D., Maffrand, J.-P., and Kitabgi, P. (1995) Mol. Pharmacol. 47, 1050-1056 [Abstract]
  38. Strosberg, A. D., Camoin, L., Blin, N., and Maigret, B. (1993) Drug Design and Discovery 9, 199-211 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Ostrowski, J., Kelsberg, M. A., Caron, M., and Lefkovwitz, R. J. (1992) Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 32, 167-183 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Miyake, A. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 208, 230-237 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Silvente-Poirot, S., and Wank, S. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 14698-14706 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Kopin, A. S., McBride, E. W., Quinn, S. M., Kolakowski, L. F., Jr., and Beinborn, M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 5019-5023 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.