CSF-1 Receptor/Insulin Receptor Chimera Permits CSF-1-dependent Differentiation of 3T3-L1 Preadipocytes*

(Received for publication, January 17, 1997, and in revised form, February 21, 1997)

Oleg V. Chaika Dagger , Nina Chaika Dagger , Deanna J. Volle Dagger , Peter A. Wilden §, Samuel J. Pirrucello and Robert E. Lewis Dagger par **

From the Dagger  Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, Departments of par  Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and  Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198-6805 and § Department of Pharmacology, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, Missouri 65212

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

A chimeric growth factor receptor (CSF1R/IR) was constructed by splicing cDNA sequences encoding the extracellular ligand binding domain of the human colony stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1) receptor to sequences encoding the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of the human insulin receptor. The addition of CSF-1 to cells transfected with the CSF1R/IR chimera cDNA stimulated the tyrosine phosphorylation of a protein that was immunoprecipitated by an antibody directed against the carboxyl terminus of the insulin receptor. Phosphopeptide maps of the 32P-labeled CSF1R/IR protein revealed the same pattern of phosphorylation observed in 32P-labeled insulin receptor beta  subunits. CSF-1 stimulated the tyrosine phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) and Shc in cells expressing the CSF1R/IR chimera. Lipid accumulation and the expression of a differentiation-specific marker demonstrated that 3T3-L1 preadipocytes undergo CSF-1-dependent differentiation when transfected with the CSF1R/IR chimera cDNA but not when transfected with the expression vector alone. A 12-amino acid deletion within the juxtamembrane region of the CSF1R/IR (CSF1R/IRDelta 960) blocked CSF-1-stimulated phosphorylation of IRS-1 and Shc but did not inhibit CSF-1-mediated differentiation of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. These observations indicate that adipocyte differentiation can be initiated by intracellular pathways that do not require tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 or Shc.


INTRODUCTION

A primary goal in the study of insulin action is the identification of the intracellular pathways that lead ultimately to changes in the rates of growth, development, and metabolism in primary target tissues of insulin (e.g. adipose, muscle, and liver). One strategy for the study of insulin-sensitive intracellular signaling has been to identify structural features within the insulin receptor that are important components of divergent signal transduction pathways. The goal of this strategy has been to create mutations within specific receptor sequences that result in the selective disruption of some insulin-regulated metabolic pathways while leaving others intact. Deletion mutagenesis of the insulin receptor cytoplasmic domain has generated insulin receptors with altered biological properties (1-4). Experiments with these receptor mutants have led to the suggestion that different regions of the insulin receptor cytoplasmic domain may play roles in modulating the distinct biological effects of insulin. Most mutations of the insulin receptor cytoplasmic domain have removed or altered autophosphorylation sites within the cytoplasmic domain (5-8). This approach has furthered the notion that tyrosine phosphorylation and the tyrosine kinase encoded within the receptor beta  subunit are essential components of normal insulin action. The majority of structure/function analyses of the insulin receptor, however, have been performed in cells expressing low levels of endogenous insulin receptors, e.g. Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)1 or Rat-1 fibroblasts cell lines (reviewed in Ref. 9). Although such cell lines readily express mutated insulin receptors following transfection, they have been less than ideal models for studying the anabolic actions of insulin because they are relatively insensitive to insulin treatment.

Although insulin-responsive cell types are excellent systems in which to study insulin action, the fact that they are highly responsive to insulin is an ironic impediment to the mutational analysis of insulin receptor function. Analysis of the ability of mutated insulin receptors to mediate insulin signaling in insulin-responsive cells is confounded by the significant background generated by endogenous insulin receptors. In an attempt to circumvent this concern, we have constructed a chimeric receptor (CSF1R/IR) consisting of the extracellular ligand binding domain of the human CSF-1 receptor (10) coupled to the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of the human insulin receptor (11-13). Chimeric receptors have proven useful for demonstrating that specific receptor structures transduce specific biological responses (14, 15).

In this report, we show that the CSF1R/IR chimera has CSF-1-dependent enzymatic and biological properties expected of the insulin receptor tyrosine kinase in insulin-responsive cells. The CSF1R/IR permits the differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells when nanomolar concentrations of CSF-1 are substituted for insulin in the differentiation protocol. A mutation within the juxtamembrane domain of the CSF1R/IR that inhibits CSF-1-stimulated phosphorylation of IRS-1 and Shc does not block the ability of CSF-1 to stimulate the differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells into adipocytes. Thus, alternative intracellular pathways that do not require tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 or Shc may be used by insulin or IGF I to stimulate differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

CHO K1 cells and CHO cells expressing the wild-type and mutated human insulin receptors were described previously (16, 17). 3T3-L1 preadipocytes were provided by Richard MacDonald, Omaha, NE. Antibody CT-1 directed against the carboxyl terminus of the human insulin receptor (18) was a gift from Ken Siddle, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Antibodies to IRS-1 were described previously (19). Anti-Shc and anti-phosphotyrosine (PY20) antibodies were from Transduction Laboratories. [32P]Orthophosphate was purchased from ICN. [35S]L-Methionine was purchased from Amersham. Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM), penicillin, streptomycin and neomycin antibiotics, G418, fetal bovine serum, restriction endonucleases, and Lipofectamine were purchased from Life Technologies, Inc. Trypsin treated with tosylphenylalanylchloromethyl ketone was obtained from Worthington Biochemical Corporation. Porcine insulin was from Calbiochem. Dexamethasone and 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine were from Sigma, and thin-layer chromatography plates were obtained from American Bioanalytical. The mammalian expression plasmid pcDNA3 was purchased from Invitrogen. The plasmid pSP72 was from Promega. Human recombinant CSF-1 was a gift from Genetics Institute. The cDNA for the human CSF-1 receptor was a gift from Charles Sherr, Memphis, TN.

Construction of the CSF-1R/IR Chimera

The CSF-1R/IR chimera was constructed using a PCR strategy. Three PCR primers were designed for construction of the chimeric receptor. chi-1 was an upstream primer that hybridizes to nucleotides 1598-1622 of the human CSF1R (10). chi-2 was a chimeric oligonucleotide to act as an upstream primer for PCR using the human insulin receptor as template. The first 19 nucleotides of chi-2 included an overhang corresponding to nucleotides 1818-1836 of the human CSF1R. The remainder of chi-2 encoded the initial portion of the insulin receptor transmembrane domain, nucleotides 2903-2927 of the human IR (13). chi-3 was a downstream primer corresponding to the complementary strand of base pairs 3028-3055 of the human IR.

The first PCR used primers chi-2 and chi-3 and the human IR cDNA as the template to produce the expected product of 172 base pairs. The second PCR used chi-1, the 172-base pair product of the first PCR, and chi-3. The template was the human CSF1R (10). The expected product was 392 base pairs and generated a DNA sequence with an in-frame attachment of sequences encoding the extracellular domain of the CSF1R to sequences encoding the transmembrane domain and a portion of the cytoplasmic domain of the insulin receptor. Restriction digest of the 392-base pair product from the second PCR with Bsu36 I and BglI yielded a 259-base pair fragment. Prior to restriction digestion, the PCR product was sequenced to confirm the integrity of the expected product.

A 1041-base pair HindIII/SalI fragment of the CSF1R was subcloned into pUC18 to create pUC18CSF1041. pUC18CSF1041 was digested with Bsu36 I and SalI, and a Bsu36 I/SalI 2081-base pair fragment of the human insulin receptor cDNA was ligated to pUC18CSF1041. The resulting construct, pUC18CSF1041/IR2081, was partially digested with Bsu36 I, and a 5083-base pair fragment of pUC18CSF1041 was isolated. The 5083-base pair fragment of pUC18CSF1041 was redigested with BglI, and the 259-base pair Bsu36 I/BglI chimeric PCR product was ligated to produce pUC18CSF1R/IR. pUC18CSF1R/IR was digested with KpnI and BamHI, and a 1966-base pair fragment was isolated.

The 3384-base pair CSF1R cDNA (10) was subcloned into EcoRI/BamHI cut pSP72 to create pSP72CSF1R. pSP72CSF1R was digested with KpnI and BamHI, and the resulting 4028-base pair fragment was isolated. The 4028-base pair KpnI/BamHI fragment of pSP72CSF1R was ligated to the 1966-base pair KpnI/BamHI fragment isolated from pUC18CSF1R/IR to yield the pSP72CSF1R/IR chimera. The CSF1R/IR chimeric cDNA was isolated by EcoRI and XbaI digestion and subcloned into pcDNA3. For stable expression of the CSF1R/IR in 3T3-L1 fibroblasts and adipocytes, the vector pEF-1 was prepared by replacement of the cytomegalovirus promoter in pcDNA3 with the promoter for the mouse elongation factor-1alpha gene (20).

A CSF1R/IR containing a 12-amino acid deletion within the juxtamembrane domain (CSF1R/IRDelta 960) was constructed by replacing the SpeI/BglI fragment from the CSF1R/IR with the corresponding 1367-base pair fragment from pSVDelta 960 (17).

Cell Culture

3T3-L1 preadipocytes were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics. CHO cells were maintained in F12 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics. All cells were incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2. For differentiation, 2 × 104 3T3-L1 preadipocytes were plated/35-mm dish, and the medium was replaced every other day after plating until the cells became confluent. The cells were maintained 2 additional days after reaching confluence without being fed to induce quiescence. After the 3T3-L1 cells had become quiescent, differentiation was induced with DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum and supplemented with 1 µM insulin, 0.25 µM dexamethasone, and 0.5 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine as described previously (21). CSF-1 was substituted for insulin at the concentrations indicated. Cells were maintained in the differentiation media for 2 days, at which time the medium was replaced with DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum and either insulin or CSF-1 at the same concentration used to induce differentiation. This media was replaced 2 days later with DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum alone. The cells were fed every 2 days thereafter with DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum until used.

Transfection of Plasmid DNA into Mammalian Cells and Isolation of Clonal Cell Lines

Transfection of CHO K1 cells and 3T3-L1 preadipocytes was performed with Lipofectamine according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cells expressing the CSF1R/IR were selected with G418 and isolated by flow cytometry with a monoclonal antibody against the extracellular domain of the human CSF-1 receptor (22) (Oncogene Science) and fluorescent secondary antibody. Flow cytometry was performed by the University of Nebraska Medical Center Flow Cytometry Core Laboratory.

Phosphorylation and Immunoprecipitation of Receptors

Metabolic labeling with 2 mCi/ml [32P]orthophosphate was performed in phosphate-free DMEM for 2 h at 37 °C as described previously (23). Lysis of cells in 1% Triton X-100 in the presence of protease and phosphatase inhibitors was performed as described previously (23). Immunoprecipitations were performed with the indicated antibodies bound to agarose-conjugated protein G.

Phosphoamino Acid Analysis

Each portion of polyacrylamide gel containing 32P-labeled receptor was excised and washed successively three times with water and acetone to remove SDS. The 32P-labeled receptor protein was digested with 10 µg tosylphenylalanylchloromethyl ketone-trypsin in 300 µl of 0.25% ammonium bicarbonate, pH 8.0, in a clean 1.5-ml Eppendorf tube. The tryptic eluate was lyophilized to dryness, and the dried phosphopeptides were reconstituted in 0.2 ml of 6 M HCl. Partial hydrolysis of the phosphopeptides was performed at 110 °C for 1 h, after which the hydrolysate was diluted 6-fold with water, lyophilized, reconstituted with 100 µl of H2O, and lyophilized a second time. Electrophoretic separation of the phosphoamino acids was performed as described (24). The plates were dried, and phosphoamino acid standards were visualized with ninhydrin. Radiolabeled phosphoamino acids were identified by autoradiography.

HPLC Phosphopeptide Mapping

For phosphopeptide mapping, the phosphorylated proteins were separated on an 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The CSF1R/IR and the insulin receptor beta  subunit were localized by autoradiography and digested twice with 100 µg/ml tosylphenylalanylchloromethyl ketone-trypsin in 0.25% ammonium bicarbonate. Phosphopeptides were separated on a Brownlee Aquapore OD300 column with a gradient of 50% acetonitrile in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid at 0.25 ml/min. Fractions were collected at 30-s intervals and counted for Cerenkov radiation.

Western Blot Analysis

Proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride or nitrocellulose membranes, and Western blots were developed using anti-Shc (1:250) or anti-phosphotyrosine (PY-20 or RC-20) antibodies as specified by the manufacturer (Transduction Laboratories) or using CT-1 (1:5000) (18) and anti-IRS-1 (1:800) (25) antibodies. Blots were developed with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate and nitro blue tetrazolium using the appropriate secondary antibody conjugated to alkaline phosphatase or with the ECL chemiluminescence kit (Amersham Corp.).


RESULTS

The CSF1R/IR chimera was expressed stably in CHO cells to assess its structure and enzymatic activity. Treatment of cells expressing the CSF1R/IR with CSF-1 for 10 min resulted in the tyrosine phosphorylation of the 170-kDa chimeric receptor protein (Fig. 1). Furthermore, tyrosine-phosphorylated CSF1R/IR chimera was precipitated by an antibody directed against the extracellular ligand binding domain of the CSF1R or by monoclonal antibody CT-1, which is specific for the carboxyl terminus of the human insulin receptor (18) (Fig. 1). No detectable tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins were immunoprecipitated from CSF-1-treated CHO cells transfected with the expression vector alone (Fig. 1). Insulin did not stimulate phosphorylation of the CSF1R/IR chimera (data not shown). These observations demonstrate the chimeric nature of the CSF1R/IR protein and that it has CSF-1-activated tyrosine kinase activity. The CSF-1 receptor has been placed in the subclass of the family of growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases that includes the platelet-derived growth factor receptor and c-kit (26). Activation of the tyrosine kinases encoded by these receptors is believed to require ligand-induced dimerization of two identical receptor proteins (26). Activation of the insulin receptor tyrosine kinase in the chimera may result from CSF-1-induced dimerization of the CSF1R/IR protein that permits trans-phosphorylation of juxtaposed tyrosine kinase domains (27). These observations suggest that the proper orientation of juxtaposed tyrosine kinase domains is sufficient for the activation of tyrosine kinase activity.


Fig. 1. CSF-1-dependent phosphorylation of the CSF1R/IR chimera. CHO cells expressing the CSF1R/IR chimeric receptor (CHOchi.10) or CHO cells transfected with the expression vector alone (CHOneo) were left untreated or treated with 10 nM CSF-1 for 10 min at 37 °C. Proteins were immunoprecipitated with antisera specific to the carboxyl terminus of the insulin receptor (CT-1), with an antibody directed against the extracellular ligand binding domain of the CSF-1 receptor (alpha CSF1R), or with non-immune antisera (NI). Immunoprecipitates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and immobilized to nitrocellulose by Western transfer. Tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins were identified by blotting with anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies.
[View Larger Version of this Image (33K GIF file)]

CSF-1 caused a dose-dependent increase in tyrosine phosphorylation of the CSF1R/IR in intact cells (Fig. 2). Quantitative analysis of the anti-phosphotyrosine Western blot indicated that stimulation of the CSF1R/IR tyrosine autophosphorylation was half-maximal at 1 nM CSF-1 and maximal at 10 nM CSF-1. The pattern of phosphorylation of the CSF1R/IR chimera was compared with the pattern of phosphorylation on the insulin receptor beta  subunit produced by insulin-stimulated autophosphorylation of the heterotetrameric insulin receptor (Fig. 3). CSF1R/IR chimeras were immunoprecipitated with antibody CT-1 from 32P-labeled and CSF-1-treated CHO cells. Immunoprecipitated CSF1R/IR protein was isolated by electrophoresis on a polyacrylamide gel and visualized by autoradiography. Human insulin receptors were similarly isolated from 32P-labeled and insulin-treated CHO cells. Analysis of CSF1R/IR and insulin receptor beta  subunit phosphopeptide maps revealed a nearly identical distribution of phosphopeptides between the two receptors (Fig. 3A). Phosphoamino acid analysis of the 32P-labeled CSF1R/IR chimera revealed the presence of phosphoserine, phosphotyrosine, and only a trace of phosphothreonine (Fig. 3B).


Fig. 2. CSF-1 dose-dependent phosphorylation of the CSF1R/IR. A, CHOchi.10 cells were labeled for 3 h at 37 °C with [35S]methionine and then treated with CSF-1 at the concentrations indicated for 10 min at 37 °C. The cells were lysed and immunoprecipitated with antibody CT-1. Tyrosine phosphorylation of the CSF1R/IR was determined by Western blot with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (PY20). B, autoradiography was performed on the Western blot shown in A to identify the amount of CSF-1R/IR present in each immunoprecipitate. C, the relative amount of tyrosine phosphorylation on the CSF1R/IR shown in A was quantified with a Molecular Dynamics densitometer.
[View Larger Version of this Image (25K GIF file)]


Fig. 3. Phosphopeptide mapping and phosphoamino acid analysis of the CSF1R/IR chimera. A, tryptic phosphopeptide map of the human insulin receptor (solid line), and CSF1R/IR chimeric receptor (dashed line). Phosphorylated CSF1R/IR and human insulin receptors were immunoprecipitated from 32P-labeled CHOchi.10 and hIRc cells, respectively. CHOchi.10 and hIRc cells were treated with 10 nM CSF-1 or 100 nM insulin, respectively, prior to lysis. Tryptic phosphopeptides were generated and resolved by high-performance liquid chromatography as described under "Materials and Methods." B, two-dimensional phosphoamino acid analysis of the CSF1R/IR chimera immunoprecipitated from 32P-labeled and CSF-1-treated cells. The relative position of phosphoamino acid standards is shown. S, phosphoserine; T, phosphothreonine; Y, phosphotyrosine. The position of inorganic phosphate (Pi) eliminated from phosphopeptides during hydrolysis is also indicated.
[View Larger Version of this Image (13K GIF file)]

The murine 3T3-L1 preadipocyte is a model system for the process of adipocyte differentiation (28). Differentiation results in the increased expression of insulin receptors (29), insulin-responsive glucose transporters (30, 31), and enzymes required for fatty acid synthesis (32-34). The differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocyte responds to insulin in a manner that resembles the normal adipocyte, a primary target of insulin action. The ability of the CSF1R/IR chimera to stimulate biological effects in cells was examined further by transfection of the plasmid pEFCSF1R/IR into 3T3-L1 preadipocytes and selection for resistance to G418. Pools consisting of at least seven independent clones expressing the CSF1R/IR were isolated by flow cytometry. 3T3-L1 preadipocytes expressing the CSF1R/IR (Fig. 4) were grown to confluence and quiescence. Differentiation was initiated with dexamethasone, isobutylmethylxanthine, and 1 µM insulin as described previously (21). Subjecting each 3T3-L1 cell line to the differentiation protocol with dexamethasone and isobutylmethylxanthine alone did not induce the adipocyte phenotype (Fig. 4, left panels). In contrast, microscopic examination of differentiated 3T3-L1 cells revealed that the addition of insulin to the differentiation protocol led to the accumulation of relatively large lipid-containing vesicles in all cell lines (Fig. 4, middle panels). In contrast to insulin treatment, the addition of 25 nM CSF-1 caused the formation of numerous, small lipid-containing vesicles within the cytoplasm of 3T3-L1 cells expressing the CSF1R/IR (Fig. 4, center right panel). Vesicle fusion did not occur in these cells, even when the cells were maintained in culture for up to 17 days following differentiation (data not shown). In contrast, no adipocyte foci were observed throughout the plate of parental 3T3-L1 cells treated with CSF-1 in place of insulin (Fig. 4, upper right panel). These data indicate that expression of the CSF-1/IR chimera is capable of lipid accumulation in 3T3-L1 cells when low doses of CSF-1 are substituted for insulin in the differentiation protocol.


Fig. 4. Insulin- and CSF-1-dependent differentiation of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. Parental 3T3-L1 cells (top panels), 3T3-L1 cells expressing the CSF1R/IR (middle panels), and 3T3-L1 cells expressing the CSF1R/IRDelta 960 (bottom panels) were subjected to the adipocyte differentiation protocol as described under "Experimental Procedures" using dexamethasone and isobutylmethyxanthine alone (left panels), or in combination with 1 µM insulin (middle panels), or with 25 nM CSF-1 (right panels). Cells were fixed and stained for the presence of lipid with Oil Red O prior to photomicroscopy.
[View Larger Version of this Image (115K GIF file)]

The ability of CSF-1 and insulin to differentiate cells expressing a mutated CSF1R/IR lacking 12 amino acids within the juxtamembrane region of the cytoplasmic domain (CSF1R/IRDelta 960) was also tested. 3T3-L1 cells expressing the CSF1R/IRDelta 960 also accumulated lipid when subjected to the differentiation protocol containing dexamethasone and isobutylmethylxanthine in combination with 1 µM insulin or 25 nM CSF-1 (Fig. 4, lower panels). Lipid vesicle formation in CSF-1-treated 3T3-L1 cell adipocytes expressing the CSF1R/IRDelta 960 was more closely akin to that observed in insulin-treated cells (Fig. 4).

Differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells expressing the CSF1R/IR and CSF1R/IRDelta 960 was confirmed by detection of the fatty acid binding protein aP2/422 following CSF-1 treatment (Fig. 5). Relative expression of the fatty acid binding protein was stronger in cells expressing the CSF1R/IRDelta 960 than in cells expressing a comparable amount of the intact CSF1R/IR and are closer in magnitude to that observed with insulin treatment of the same cells. These observations are consistent with the relative amount of lipid accumulation in CSF-1-treated 3T3-L1 cells expressing the CSF1R/IRDelta 960 as compared with cells expressing the intact CSF1R/IR (Fig. 4).


Fig. 5. CSF-1-dependent expression of aP2/422a in 3T3-L1 adipocytes expressing the CSF-1R/IR and CSF1R/IRDelta 960. Parental 3T3-L1 cells (left panel), 3T3-L1 cells expressing the intact CSF1R/IR (center panel), or 3T3-L1 cells expressing the CSF1R/IRDelta 960 (right panel) were treated with or without dexamethasone and isobutylmethylxanthine in the presence or absence of CSF-1 or insulin as described under "Experimental Procedures." Cells were lysed 6 days after the initiation of the differentiation protocol, and aliquots of each lysate were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, and probed with antisera against the fatty acid binding protein aP2/422a.
[View Larger Version of this Image (26K GIF file)]

The juxtamembrane region of the insulin receptor cytoplasmic domain encodes structures that are important for the recognition and phosphorylation of the intracellular mediators IRS-1 and Shc by the insulin receptor tyrosine kinase (1, 4, 35). We tested the ability of CSF-1 to stimulate the tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 and Shc in 3T3-L1 cells expressing the CSF1R/IR or the CSF1R/IRDelta 960. CSF-1 stimulated phosphorylation of IRS-1 and Shc (Figs. 6 and 7) in 3T3-L1 cells expressing the CSF1R/IR. However, CSF-1 was unable to stimulate the tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 or Shc in cells expressing the CSF1R/IRDelta 960 (Figs. 6 and 7). Comparable amounts of IRS-1 and Shc proteins were precipitated from 3T3-L1 cells expressing either the CSF1R/IR or the CSF1R/IRDelta 960 (Figs. 6 and 7). CSF-1 was equipotent to IGF I in its ability to stimulate the phosphorylation of IRS-1 in cells expressing the CSF1R/IR (Fig. 6). Interestingly, insulin consistently failed to stimulate the tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc in 3T3-L1 cells expressing the CSF1R/IR, despite the fact that insulin readily induced differentiation of these cells (Fig. 7). In contrast, insulin stimulated the phosphorylation of Shc strongly in 3T3-L1 adipocytes expressing the CSF1R/IRDelta 960 (Fig. 7).


Fig. 6. CSF-1-dependent phosphorylation of IRS-1 in 3T3-L1 cells expressing the CSF1R/IR and CSF1R/IRDelta 960. A, left panel, 3T3-L1 adipocytes expressing the CSF1R/IR or CSF1R/IRDelta 960 were incubated with 10 nM CSF-1, 10 nM IGF I, or left untreated for 10 min at 37 °C, lysed, and immunoprecipitated with antibody to IRS-1. Tyrosine phosphorylated IRS-1 was detected on a Western blot with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody PY20. Right panel, IRS-1 was immunoprecipitated with a rabbit polyclonal antibody from identical numbers of cells expressing CSF1R/IR or CSF1R/IRDelta 960 chimeras used in the left panel. IRS-1 was resolved by Western blot using a mouse monoclonal anti-IRS-1 antibody. B, quantitative analysis of IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation shown in A. The relative amounts of tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins were determined by scanning densitometry. The results shown represent the means of three independent experiments; bars, S.D.
[View Larger Version of this Image (18K GIF file)]


Fig. 7. CSF-1-dependent phosphorylation of Shc in 3T3-L1 cells expressing the CSF1R/IR and CSF1R/IRDelta 960. A, left panel, 3T3-L1 adipocytes expressing the CSF1R/IR or CSF1R/IRDelta 960 were incubated with 10 nM CSF-1, 1 µM insulin, or left untreated for 1 min at 37 °C, lysed ,and immunoprecipitated with antibody to Shc. The tyrosine-phosphorylated 52-kDa Shc isoform was detected on a Western blot with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody PY20. Right panel, Shc was immunoprecipitated with a rabbit polyclonal antibody from identical numbers of the 3T3-L1 adipocytes expressing CSF1R/IR or CSF1R/IRDelta 960 chimeras used in the left panel. Shc was resolved by Western blot using a mouse monoclonal anti-Shc antibody. B, quantitative analysis of Shc tyrosine phosphorylation shown in A. The relative amounts of tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins were determined by scanning densitometry. The results shown represent the means of three independent experiments; bars, S.D.
[View Larger Version of this Image (23K GIF file)]

The ability of the CSF-1R/IR to generate insulin-like effects in 3T3-L1 cells might be due to the ability of this receptor to transactivate endogenous insulin receptors. This possibility was tested in CHO cells expressing both the human insulin receptor and the CSF1R/IR and in differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Fig. 8 demonstrates that the CSF-1 does not stimulate the tyrosine phosphorylation of the insulin receptor beta  subunit in either transfected CHO cells (A) or in differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes (B) despite the fact that the insulin receptor and the CSF1R/IR are detected in similar amounts in both cell lines. Similarly, insulin does not stimulate the tyrosine phosphorylation of the CSF1R/IR in these cells.


Fig. 8. Phosphorylation of the CSF1R/IR and the insulin receptor in cells expressing both receptors. A, CHO cells expressing the human insulin receptor and the CSF1R/IR were treated with 10 nM CSF-1 or with 100 nM insulin. The receptors were coprecipitated with antibody CT-1 directed against the insulin receptor carboxyl terminus. Receptor proteins were detected on Western blots probed with anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies (PY-20) or with CT-1. B, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were treated with 10 nM CSF-1, and the receptors were immunoprecipitated and probed on Western blots as described for A.
[View Larger Version of this Image (32K GIF file)]


DISCUSSION

We have constructed a chimeric growth factor receptor consisting of the extracellular ligand binding domain of the human CSF-1 receptor spliced to the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of the human insulin receptor. CSF-1 activates the CSF1R/IR tyrosine kinase to autophosphorylate and phosphorylate endogenous proteins in a manner characteristic of the normal insulin receptor. Furthermore, the CSF1R/IR is capable of mediating the CSF-1-dependent differentiation of 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Deletions within the juxtamembrane domain of the CSF1R/IR that abrogate its ability to phosphorylate IRS-1 and Shc do not inhibit the ability of this mutated chimera to stimulate adipocyte differentiation. Thus, IRS-1 and Shc activation by the insulin receptor kinase does not appear to be essential for the induction of adipocyte differentiation.

3T3-L1 preadipocytes express low levels of high-affinity insulin receptor binding sites prior to differentiation (29). High concentrations of insulin (1 µM) are thought to induce differentiation of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes through activation of the IGF I receptor (36). However, gene targeting of one insulin receptor allele in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes impaired the ability of these cells to differentiate into adipocytes (37), suggesting that insulin can play a direct role in the differentiation of the 3T3-L1 cells. The present studies support the notion that the insulin receptor cytoplasmic domain is also capable of initiating the intracellular signals sufficient for adipocyte differentiation. The insulin receptor tyrosine kinase domain, which is essential to receptor signaling, shares 84% identity with the tyrosine kinase domain of the IGF I receptor (38). The juxtamembrane domains of the insulin and IGF I receptors are 61% identical (38). Furthermore, five of the six known tyrosine autophosphorylation sites in the insulin receptor cytoplasmic domain (5-8) are conserved within the IGF I receptor (38). Thus, it is likely that structures conserved between the cytoplasmic domains of the insulin receptor and IGF I receptor are essential components of intracellular signaling pathways that result in adipocyte differentiation.

IRS-1 and Shc are substrates for the insulin receptor tyrosine kinase and contain structural domains that interact directly with the juxtamembrane region of the insulin receptor cytoplasmic domain (39-42). Mutations within the insulin receptor juxtamembrane domain abrogate the ability of the insulin receptor to phosphorylate IRS-1 and Shc and couple to intracellular signaling pathways (1, 4, 35). The ability of juxtamembrane mutations to block IRS-1 and Shc phosphorylation by the insulin receptor kinase is likely due to the loss of phosphorylation at Tyr960. Tyr960 has been shown to be essential for the interaction of the insulin receptor with IRS-1 and Shc (39, 41-43). These intracellular substrates are believed to be important intermediates in the activation of Ras in response to insulin addition (4, 44-46). Phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase activity is also stimulated primarily through the phosphorylation of IRS-1 (47, 48), although a small amount of phosphatidylinositol 3' kinase activation occurs through association of p85 with the carboxyl-terminal tail of the insulin receptor (49, 50). The observation that the juxtamembrane deletion within the CSF1R/IRDelta 960 inhibits CSF-1-stimulated phosphorylation of IRS-1 and Shc (Figs. 6 and 7) in 3T3-L1 fibroblasts suggests that alternative pathways may be able to mediate the ability of the receptor to stimulate adipocyte differentiation. We cannot exclude the possibility that IRS-1 or Shc proteins might be phosphorylated in 3T3-L1 cells by the CSF1R/IRDelta 960 to a small extent during the prolonged period of exposure of 3T3-L1 cells to differentiation medium containing CSF-1. Slow or imperceptible amounts of phosphorylation might not be detected by assay of IRS-1 and Shc phosphorylation following an acute exposure of cells to CSF-1. However, deletion of the juxtamembrane domain from the CSF1R/IR facilitated the accumulation of lipid (Fig. 4) and the expression of the adipocyte-specific fatty acid binding protein aP2/422 (Fig. 5) in cells treated with CSF-1. These observations suggest that IRS-1 or Shc-mediated signaling may not facilitate the accumulation of lipid or the fusion of lipid-containing vesicles. The amount of CSF-1 used to induce adipocyte differentiation (25 nM) is sufficient to maximally activate the CSF1R/IR tyrosine kinase (Fig. 3). The limited degree of CSF-1-induced differentiation we observe in 3T3-L1 cells expressing the intact CSF1R/IR appears consistent with the description of fat cells formed in transgenic mice overexpressing normal Ras protein (51). Because IRS and Shc proteins appear to link insulin receptor tyrosine kinase activity to Ras, it is interesting to speculate that increased sensitivity to Ras may limit the extent of differentiation.

These data suggest that alternative signaling intermediates may be used for transmission of signals from the insulin receptor cytoplasmic domain to promote adipocyte differentiation. Additional substrates for the insulin receptor kinase have been identified, including IRS-2 (52), Gab-1 (53), a 115-kDa protein that associates with the protein-tyrosine phosphatase SHPTP2 (54), and three distinct substrates of molecular weight 53,000-60,000 (55-57). IRS-2 contains a PTB domain and has been shown to interact with the NPEY motif within the juxtamembrane domain of the insulin and IGF I receptors (58, 59). Yeast two-hybrid analysis indicates that additional sequences within IRS-2 may also interact with the insulin receptor (58, 59). Gab-1 shares homology with IRS-1 and IRS-2 but does not encode a PTB domain (53). Thus, the juxtamembrane domain of the insulin receptor may not be essential for the phosphorylation of Gab-1 by the tyrosine kinase of the insulin receptor. The potential role of these substrates in regulating insulin-induced adipocyte differentiation is not yet known.

The CSF1R/IR chimera provides an opportunity to explore the role of specific cytoplasmic structures in the induction of adipocyte differentiation. Additional autophosphorylation sites capable of associating with SH2 domain-containing proteins reside in the carboxyl-terminal tail and within the catalytic domain. The role of the carboxyl-terminal tail of the insulin receptor cytoplasmic domain in regulating metabolic and mitogenic signaling (2, 3, 60, 61), as well as differentiation, can be similarly explored in insulin-responsive cell types with the CSF1R/IR chimera. Additional alterations of the CSF1R/IR cytoplasmic domain will provide the opportunity to probe for structures within the insulin receptor cytoplasmic domain that may be necessary for the induction of differentiation and other biological events.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by Grant DK41896 (to R. E. L.) from the National Institutes of Health, Grant NE-92-GB-2 from the Nebraska affiliate of the American Heart Association (to R. E. L.), grants from the American Diabetes Association (to R. E. L and P. A. W.), a grant from the Diabetes Action Research and Education Foundation (to P. A. W.), a grant from the University of Missouri System Research Board (to P. A. W.), and institutional awards SIG-16 from the American Cancer Society and P30 CA36727 from the National Cancer Institute to the Eppley Institute.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
**   To whom correspondence should be addressed: Eppley Cancer Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 600 S. 42nd St., Omaha, NE 68198-6805. Phone: 402-559-8290; Fax: 402-559-4651; E-mail: rlewis{at}unmc.edu.
1   The abbreviations used are: CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; CSF, colony-stimulating factor; IR, insulin receptor; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; IGF, insulin-like growth factor.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We express our appreciation to J. Whittaker for providing the human insulin receptor and cDNA; C. Sherr for providing the cDNA of the human CSF-1 receptor; M. Roussel, K. Siddle, O. A. MacDougald, M. D. Lane, and Y. Ebina for providing antibodies; R. Hines for the EF-1a promoter; and R. MacDonald for critical reading of the manuscript. We thank Genetics Institute (Cambridge, MA) for the invaluable gift of recombinant human CSF-1.


REFERENCES

  1. White, M. F., Livingston, J. N., Backer, J. M., Lauris, V., Ullrich, A., and Kahn, C. R. (1988) Cell 54, 641-649 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Maegawa, H., McClain, D. A., Friedenberg, G., Olefsky, J. M., Napier, M., Lipari, T., Dull, T. J., Lee, J., and Ullrich, A. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 8912-8917 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Theis, R. S., Ullrich, A., and McClain, D. A. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 12820-12825 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Yonezawa, K., Ando, A., Kaburagi, Y., Yamamoto-Honda, R., Kitamura, T., Hara, K., Nakafuku, M., Okabayashi, Y., Kadowaki, T., Kaziro, Y., and Kasuga, M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 4634-4640 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Tornqvist, H. E., Pierce, M. W., Frackelton, A. R., Nemenoff, R. A., and Avruch, J. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 10212-10219 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Tornqvist, H. E, Gunsalus, J. R., Nemenoff, R. A., Frackelton, A. R., Pierce, M. W., and Avruch, J. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 350-359 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Tavaré, J. M., and Denton, R. M. (1988) Biochem. J. 252, 607-615 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Feener, E. P., Backer, J. M., King, G. L., Wilden, P. A., Sun, X. J., Kahn, C. R., and White, M. F. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 11256-11264 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Tavaré, J. M., and Siddle, K. (1993) Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 1178, 21-39 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Coussens, L., Van Beveren, C., Smith, D., Chen, E., Mitchell, R. L., Isacke, C. M., Verma, I. M., and Ullrich, A. (1986) Nature 320, 277-280 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Ullrich, A., Bell, J. R., Chen, E. Y., Herrera, R., Petruzzelli, L. M., Dull, T. J., Gray, A., Coussens, L., Rosen, O. M., and Ramachandran, J. (1985) Nature 313, 756-761 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Ebina, Y., Ellis, L., Jarnagin, K., Edery, M., Graf, L., Clauser, E., Ou, J.-h., Masiarz, F., Kan, Y. W., Goldfine, I. D., Roth, R. A., and Rutter, W. J. (1985) Cell 40, 747-758 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Whittaker, J. C., Okamoto, A. K., Thys, R., Bell, G. I., Steiner, D. F., and Hofmann, C. A. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 5237-5241 [Abstract]
  14. Yan, H., Schlessinger, J., and Chao, M. V. (1991) Science 252, 561-563 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Reidel, H., Dull, T. J., Honegger, A. M., Schlessinger, J., and Ullrich, A. (1989) EMBO J. 8, 2943-2954 [Abstract]
  16. Wilden, P. A., Kahn, C. R., Siddle, K., and White, M. F. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 16660-16668 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Backer, J. M., Kahn, C. R., Cahill, D. A., Ullrich, A., and White, M. F. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 16450-16454 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ganderton, R. H., Stanley, K. K., Field, C. E., Coghlan, M. P., Soos, M. A., and Siddle, K. (1992) Biochem. J. 288, 195-205 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Rothenberg, P. L., Lane, W. S., Karasik, A., Backer, J., White, M., and Kahn, C. R. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 8302-8311 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Kim, D. W., Uetsuki, T., Kaziro, Y., Yamaguchi, N., and Sugano, S. (1990) Gene (Amst.) 91, 217-223 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Harrison, S. A., Buxton, J. M., Clancy, B. M., and Czech, M. P. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 20106-20116 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Sherr, C. J., Ashmun, R. A., Downing, J. R., Ohtsuka, M., Quan, S. G., Golde, D. W., and Roussel, M. F. (1989) Blood 73, 1786-1793 [Abstract]
  23. Lewis, R. E., Volle, D. J., and Sanderson, S. D. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 26259-26266 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Boyle, W. J., Van der Geer, P., and Hunter, T. (1991) Methods Enzymol. 201, 110-149 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Wilden, P. A., and Broadway, D. E. (1995) J. Cell. Physiol. 163, 9-18 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Ullrich, A., and Schlessinger, J. (1990) Cell 61, 203-212 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Frattali, A. L., Treadway, J. L., and Pessin, J. E. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 19521-19528 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Green, H., and Kehinde, O. (1974) Cell 1, 113-116
  29. Rubin, C. S., Hirsch, A., Fung, C., and Rosen, O. M. (1978) J. Biol. Chem. 253, 7570-7578 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. de Herreros, A. G., and Birnbaum, M. J. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 19994-19999 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Kaestner, K. H., Christy, R. J., and Lane, M. D. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 251-255 [Abstract]
  32. Coleman, R. A., Reed, B. C., Mackall, J. C., Student, A. K., Lane, M. D., and Bell, R. M. (1978) J. Biol. Chem. 253, 7256-7261 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Spooner, P. M., Chernick, S. S., Garrison, M. M., and Scow, R. O. (1979) J. Biol. Chem. 254, 1305-1311 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Student, A. K., Hsu, R. Y., and Lane, M. D. (1980) J. Biol. Chem. 255, 4745-4750 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Kaburagi, Y., Momomura, K., Yamamoto-Honda, R., Tobe, K., Tamori, Y., Sakura, H., Akanuma, Y., Yazaki, Y., and Kadowaki, T. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 16610-16622 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Smith, P. J., Wise, L. S., Berkowitz, R., Wan, C., and Rubin, C. S. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 9402-9408 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Accili, D., and Taylor, S. I. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 4708-4712 [Abstract]
  38. Ullrich, A., Gray, A., Tam, A. W., Yang-Feng, T., Tsubokawa, M., Collins, C., Henzel, W., Le Bon, T., Kathuria, S., Chen, E., Jacobs, S., Franke, U., Ramachandran, J., and Fujita-Yamaguchi, Y. (1986) EMBO J. 5, 2503-2512 [Abstract]
  39. Eck, M. J., Dhe-Paganon, S., Trüb, T., Nolte, R. T., and Shoelson, S. E. (1996) Cell 85, 695-705 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. O'Neill, T. J., Craparo, A., and Gustafson, T. A. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 6433-6442 [Abstract]
  41. Gustafson, T. A., He, W., Craparo, A., Schaub, C. D., and O'Neill, T. J. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 2500-2508 [Abstract]
  42. Craparo, A., O'Neill, T. J., and Gustafson, T. A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 15639-15643 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Wolf, G., Trüb, T., Ottinger, E., Groninga, L., Lynch, A., White, M. F., Miyazaki, M., Lee, J., and Shoelson, S. E. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 27407-27410 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Sasaoka, T., Draznin, B., Leitner, J. W., Langlois, W. J., and Olefsky, J. M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 10734-10738 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Baltensperger, K., Kozma, L. M., Cherniack, A. D., Klarlund, J. K., Chawla, A., Banerjee, U., and Czech, M. P. (1993) Science 260, 1950-1952 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Skolnik, E. Y., Batzer, A., Li, N., Lee, C.-H., Lowenstein, E., Mohammadi, M., Margolis, B., and Schlessinger, J. (1993) Science 260, 1953-1955 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Backer, J. M., Myers, M. G., Jr., Shoelson, S. E., Chin, D. J., Sun, X.-J., Miralpeix, M., Hu, P., Margolis, B., Skolnik, E. Y., Schlessinger, J., and White, M. F. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 3469-3479 [Abstract]
  48. Myers, M. G., Jr., Backer, J. M., Sun, X. J., Shoelson, S., Hu, P., Schlessinger, J., Yoakim, M., Schaffhausen, B., and White, M. F. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 10350-10354 [Abstract]
  49. Van Horn, D. J., Myers, M. G., Jr., and Backer, J. M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 29-32 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Levy-Toledano, R., Taouis, M., Blaettler, D. H., Gorden, P., and Taylor, S. I. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 31178-31182 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Houseknecht, K. L., Zhu, A. X., Gnudi, L., Hamann, A., Zierath, J. R., Tozzo, E., Flier, J. S., and Kahn, B. B. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 11347-11355 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Sun, X. J., Wang, L. M., Zhang, Y. T., Yenush, L., Myers, M. G., Jr., Glasheen, E., Lane, W. S., Pierce, J. H., and White, M. F. (1995) Nature 377, 173-177 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  53. Holgado-Madruga, M., Emlet, D. R., Moscatello, D. K., Godwin, A. K., and Wong, A. J. (1996) Nature 379, 560-564 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  54. Yamauchi, K., Ribon, V., Saltiel, A. R., and Pessin, J. E. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 17716-17722 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Yeh, T. C., Ogawa, W., Danielsen, A. G., and Roth, R. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 2921-2928 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Lavan, B. E., and Lienhard, G. E. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 5921-5928 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Hosomi, Y., Shii, K., Ogawa, W., Matsuba, H., Yoshida, M., Okada, Y., Yokono, K., Kasuga, M., Baba, S., and Roth, R. A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 11498-11502 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Sawka-Verhelle, D., Tartare-Deckert, S., White, M. F., and Van Obberghen, E. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5980-5983 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. He, W., Craparo, A., Zhu, Y., O'Neill, T. J., Wang, L.-M., Pierce, J. H., and Gustafson, T. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 11641-11645 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Takata, Y., Webster, N. J. G., and Olefsky, J. M. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 9065-9070 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Begum, N., Olefsky, J. M., and Draznin, B. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 7917-7922 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.