Regulated Shedding of Syndecan-1 and -4 Ectodomains by Thrombin and Growth Factor Receptor Activation*

(Received for publication, September 27, 1996, and in revised form, March 26, 1997)

Sukanya V. Subramanian Dagger , Marilyn L. Fitzgerald Dagger and Merton Bernfield §

From the Joint Program in Neonatology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

The syndecan family of transmembrane heparan sulfate proteoglycans is abundant on the surface of all adherent mammalian cells. Syndecans bind and modify the action of various growth factors/cytokines, proteases/antiproteases, cell adhesion molecules, and extracellular matrix components. Syndecan expression is highly regulated during wound repair, a process orchestrated by many of these effectors. Each syndecan ectodomain is shed constitutively by cultured cells, but the mechanism and significance of this shedding are not understood. Therefore, we examined (i) whether physiological agents active during wound repair influence syndecan shedding, and (ii) whether wound fluids contain shed syndecan ectodomains.

Using SVEC4-10 endothelial cells we find that certain proteases and growth factors accelerate shedding of the syndecan-1 and -4 ectodomains. Protease-accelerated shedding is completely inhibited by serum-containing media. Thrombin activity is duplicated by the 14-amino acid thrombin receptor agonist peptide that directly activates the thrombin receptor and is not inhibited by serum. Epidermal growth factor family members accelerate shedding but FGF-2, platelet-derived growth factor-AB, transforming growth factor-beta , tumor necrosis factor-alpha , and vascular endothelial cell growth factor 165 do not. Shed ectodomains are soluble, stable in the conditioned medium, have the same size core proteins regardless whether shed at a basal rate, or accelerated by thrombin or epidermal growth factor-family members and are found in acute human dermal wound fluids. Thus, shedding is accelerated by activation of at least two distinct receptor classes, G protein-coupled (thrombin) and protein tyrosine kinase (epidermal growth factor). Proteases and growth factors active during wound repair can accelerate syndecan shedding from cell surfaces. Regulated shedding of syndecans suggests physiological roles for the soluble proteoglycan ectodomains.


INTRODUCTION

The response to tissue injury is orchestrated by multiple soluble effectors. These are derived from the blood plasma, immigrant cells from the circulation and resident cells at the wound site, and include proteases, antiproteases, growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines (1). Heparin modifies the action of several of these effector molecules such as thrombin, antithrombin III, heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor (HB-EGF),1 vascular endothelial cell growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, and interleukin-8 (2-4). These interactions focus attention on the potential regulatory role of the heparan sulfate that is at the surface of all adherent cells.

Much of the heparan sulfate at the cell surface is derived from the syndecan family of transmembrane proteoglycans. These four gene products consist of single polypeptides which comprise at their COOH termini a short cytoplasmic domain (28-34 amino acids) containing three invariant tyrosines, and at their NH2 termini an extracellular domain (ectodomain) that places heparan sulfate chains distal from the plasma membrane. The syndecans bind a variety of growth factors, cytokines, proteases, antiproteases, and cell adhesion molecules (5, 6), are individually expressed in distinct cell-, tissue-, and development-specific patterns (7), and show cell-specific variations in the structure of their heparan sulfate chains (8, 9).

Syndecan expression is highly regulated during development, neoplasia, and wound repair (2, 4, 6, 10). Following skin wounds in mice, the keratinocytes at the leading edge migrating into the wound show a loss of cell surface syndecan-1. Concomitantly, syndecan-1 expression increases on the endothelial cells and syndecan-4 expression increases on the dermal fibroblasts that comprise the forming granulation tissue (11, 12). Cell surface syndecan-1 and -4 and their transcripts are induced in cultured endothelia and fibroblasts by PR-39, a pig neutrophil-derived antimicrobial peptide, and analogous inductive activity is found in human wound fluid (13). While syndecan expression can be regulated at or following transcription, depending on the cell type or pathophysiological situation, the precise mechanism(s) underlying these changes is unknown (11, 14-17).

A diverse group of transmembrane proteins is regulated by proteolytic cleavage of their ectodomains which are then released into the surrounding milieu (18-20). These cell surface proteins often have soluble counterparts in vivo, and can be detected in various body fluids (18, 21). This shedding can result in solubilization of the functional domains of the cell surface proteins. Recently, this shedding has been shown to be a highly regulated process and a common system has been proposed for regulating the shedding of several transmembrane proteins released by the action of calcium ionophores or protein kinase C activators such as phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) (22-24).

It has been known for many years that syndecan-1 is shed constitutively by cultured cells (25) and that this shedding involves release of the soluble ectodomain (26). Indeed, each of the syndecan family members is shed (7) and the site of cleavage has been suggested to be a dibasic sequence (syndecan-1, -2, -3) or a basic residue (syndecan-4) adjacent to the plasma membrane (6, 25).

We have recently found that features of syndecan shedding are similar to those of the common system proposed to be responsible for shedding of several membrane-anchored growth factors, growth factor receptors, cell adhesion, and other membrane proteins. As with the common system, syndecan-1 and -4 are shed at basal levels, but this shedding is accelerated within minutes of treating cells with PMA (27). Drosophila syndecan lacks basic residues adjacent to the plasma membrane, yet is readily shed from cultured cells (28). Thus, as with cleavage by the common system, the amino acid sequence may not be of primary importance to the cleavage process. Finally, the apparent loss of cell surface syndecan-1 during wound repair, a process involving various proteases and growth factors, recalled the findings that receptor stimulation can activate the common shedding system (29-31).

Therefore, we examined whether (i) agents that are active during acute wound repair influence syndecan shedding and (ii) dermal wound fluids contain shed syndecans. We find that plasmin, thrombin, and epidermal growth factor (EGF) family members accelerate the shedding of the syndecan-1 and -4 ectodomains from cultured endothelial cell surfaces, that activation of at least two distinct receptor classes (G protein-coupled and protein tyrosine kinase) accelerates shedding, and that the syndecan -1 and -4 ectodomains are in acute human dermal wound fluids. Regulated shedding of the syndecans suggests a physiological role for the soluble proteoglycan ectodomains.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

Recombinant human (rHu) HB-EGF was obtained from Dr. J. Abraham (Scios-Nova, Mountain View, CA); rHu EGF, TGF-alpha , and FGF-2 from Intergen (Purchase, NY); rHu platelet derived growth factor AB from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY); rHu vascular endothelial cell growth factor 165 from Dr. G. Neufeld (Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel); rHu TNF-alpha and porcine platelet TGF-beta 1 from R & D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Plasmin (human plasma), thrombin (human plasma), thrombin receptor agonist peptide (TRAP), soybean trypsin inhibitor, and genistein were from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA). Tyrphostin 25 and methyl 2,5-dihydroxycinnamate were from Toronto Research Chemicals (Ontario, Canada). Urokinase-type plasminogen activator, PMA, and TPCK-treated trypsin were from Sigma. Heparan sulfate lyase (heparatinase, EC 4.2.2.8) and chondroitin sulfate ABC lyase (chondroitinase ABC, EC 4.2.2.4) were from Seikagaku America Inc. (Rockville, MD).

Immunochemicals

Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG and horseradish peroxidase goat anti-rabbit IgG were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc. (West Grove, PA) or Amersham Life Sciences. Antibodies specific to syndecan ectodomains included monoclonal antibodies 281-2 against the mouse syndecan-1 ectodomain (32), 5G9 and 8C7 against the syndecan-4 ectodomain (12), polyclonal antisera MSE-2, MSE-3, and MSE-4, against their respective recombinant mouse syndecan ectodomains (7) and polyclonal antisera HSE-1, against the recombinant human syndecan-1 ectodomain (12).

Serum antibodies prepared against the syndecan-1 and -4 cytoplasmic domains, which are identical in sequence across species, detect both mouse and human syndecan-1 and -4, respectively. Polyclonal antisera S7C, against a 7-amino acid synthetic peptide (KQEEFYA) corresponding to the COOH terminus of syndecan-1, has been described (26). Antibodies specific for the syndecan-4 cytoplasmic domain were prepared against a 13-amino acid peptide (LGKKPIYKKAPTN) unique to the syndecan-4 cytoplasmic domain. The immunogen was synthesized using the multiple antigen peptide system and used for immunization and boosts of rabbits at Quality Controlled Biochemicals Inc. (Hopkinton, MA). The antisera was called SCD-4 for syndecan cytoplasmic domain followed by the number corresponding to the specific syndecan family member.

Specificity of SCD-4 was determined by immunoprecipitation of [35S]S04-labeled SVEC4-10 cell lysates prepared in RIPA buffer (RIPA: 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1% deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) with antisera specific for each of the four syndecan ectodomains (281-2, MSE-2, MSE-3, and MSE-4). Each antigen-antibody complex contained radioactivity, indicating that these cells express all four syndecans. The complexes were eluted from protein A beads by boiling in 1:1 (v/v) of 2% SDS in 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, the eluate was diluted to 0.1% SDS with RIPA buffer without SDS and equal portions were re-immunoprecipitated with SCD-4 sera and preimmune sera as a control. [35S]S04 counts in the resulting immune complexes were found only in the complex obtained with MSE-4. Thus, SCD-4 is selective for the cytoplasmic domain of syndecan-4.

Purification of SVEC4-10 Cell Lysates and Conditioned Media

The shed form of syndecan-1 and -4 was partially purified from the conditioned media (CM) of confluent cells cultured for 3 days by QAE-Sephadex A-25 (Pharmacia) and cesium chloride density gradient separation similar to the method of Rapraeger and Bernfield (33). One µl of this partially purified CM represents the amount of heparan sulfate proteoglycan purified from 1 ml of SVEC4-10 CM. The native transmembrane form of syndecan-1 and -4 was prepared from a RIPA lysate of confluent cells in a 75-cm2 flask (Falcon). The lysate was partially purified on a DEAE-Sephacel column, precipitated with 95% ethanol containing 1.3% potassium acetate, and dissolved in deionized water. Five hundred µl of this partially purified lysate represents the amount of heparin sulfate proteoglycan in the lysate collected from 2.5 × 107 cells.

Wound Fluid and Plasma Samples

Acute human dermal wound fluids were obtained and treated essentially as described by Grinnell et al. (34) and Wysocki et al. (35). Briefly, wound fluid was collected at 1-day intervals for three consecutive days from sterile closed-suction drains routinely placed in the subcutaneous space following mammoplasty. Fluids were centrifuged at 200 × g for 15 min to pellet cells and debri, and further clarified at 3300 × g and stored frozen (-70 °C). Wound fluids were kindly provided by Dr. E. Eriksson, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. The use of this anonymous discarded material was approved by the Human Research Committee of the Brigham and Women's Hospital, protocol number 92-5416-01. Blood plasma was collected from human blood diluted 1:1 (v/v) with phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, at 37 °C following separation of cellular components on a Ficoll (Histopaque 1083, Sigma) gradient by centrifugation at 1000 × g for 30 min at room temperature and stored frozen (-70 °C).

Cell Culture and Shedding Assay

SVEC4-10 cells were cultured in 96-well and 6-well tissue culture plates (Costar or Falcon) for 16 and 8 h assays, respectively. Cells were grown to confluence in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing glucose at 4.5 g/liter (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY), supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS, Intergen, Purchase, NY) and L-glutamine. At the time of treatment, culture media was replaced with fresh media containing the indicated amounts of FCS and test agents. Following incubation for the indicated times, cells were examined by phase microscopy for survival and morphology and the conditioned media harvested for dot blot analysis. Cells in 96-well plates were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde (in Hepes-buffered saline, pH 7.4, with 1 mM CaCl2, 0.5 mM MgCl2), washed with Tris-buffered saline (TBS) and extracted with 0.1 N NaOH or 1% Triton X-100 in 50 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0. Protein was measured using the BCA protein assay (Pierce) with bovine serum albumin as the standard. The 96-well plate (16 h) assays were performed in triplicate with 100 µl of media per well. The 6-well plate (8 h) assays yielded 600 µl of media per well, which was divided into three equal portions for dot blot analysis. All assays were performed at least three times.

Cell Surface Trypsinization

Trypsinization of cell surface syndecans from SVEC4-10 cell monolayers in 6-well plates was performed essentially as described (25). Briefly, following harvesting of the conditioned media (600 µl), cell layers were washed twice with ice-cold 0.5 mM EDTA-TBS and incubated with 600 µl of 10 µg/ml TPCK-treated trypsin in the same buffer for 10 min on ice. After incubation, soybean trypsin inhibitor was added to 50 µg/ml, cells were counted with a hemocytometer and centrifuged (200 × g) for 5 min at 4 °C. Supernatants containing the ectodomains were used immediately or stored at 4 °C for protein determination and dot immunoassay. Total RNA was extracted from pellets as described below.

Dot Immunoassay

SVEC4-10 cell conditioned media, lysates, and trypsinates, and human dermal wound fluids were diluted in Buffer A (0.15 M NaCl buffered to pH 4.5 with 50 mM NaOAc, with 0.1% Triton X-100), and applied to cationic polyvinylidene difluoride-based membranes (Immobilon-N, Millipore, Bedford, MA) under mild vacuum in an immunodot apparatus (V&P Scientific, San Diego, CA). The membranes were washed twice with Buffer A, and then blocked by a 1-h incubation in Blotto (3% Carnation instant nonfat dry milk, 0.5% bovine serum albumin, 0.15 M NaCl in 10 mM Tris, pH 7.4). Membranes were incubated with the indicated concentration of primary antibody specific for a syndecan ectodomain or cytoplasmic domain, washed in TBS containing 0.3% Tween 20, and incubated with a 5000-fold dilution of the appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary. All antibodies were diluted in Blotto with 0.3% Tween 20.

Detection was by the ECL system (Amersham) as described by the manufacturer, and quantitation was by laser densitometry using the LKB UltroScan XL densitometer (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.) running the GelScan XL software package (Pharmacia). Assay specificity was confirmed by eluting the membranes containing conditioned media by boiling in 2% SDS-PAGE sample buffer. The only immunoreactive materials detected on Western blots were the respective proteoglycans.

Assay quantitation was provided by including known standard amounts of the purified soluble syndecan-1 ectodomain (25) on each dot blot as an internal control. These showed a linear increase of absorbance units (AU) between 0.2 and 3.2 ng of syndecan-1. Standard amounts of SVEC4-10 cell conditioned media (day 3) were used as an internal control for the shed syndecan-4 ectodomain, and these also showed a linear increase of AU. In each case experimental values for dot blot quantitation were within these linear ranges. AU varied between experiments, in part, because of differences in exposure times and, in part, because of differences in treatment parameters. Thus, absorbance units were not compared between experiments. Results are expressed as the amount of syndecan shed in AU; for 16 h assays the values are normalized for micrograms of cellular protein. Each point represents the mean ± S.D. of triplicate determinations. Statistical significance was calculated using the Student's t test with the Instat biostatistic program.

Western Blot Analyis of Syndecans From Conditioned Media and Wound Fluids

SVEC4-10 cells at confluence in 150-mm plates (Falcon, Lincoln Park, NJ) were incubated in 12 ml of serum-free medium for 16 h. Proteoglycans in the conditioned medium were precipitated twice with 95% ethanol containing 3% potassium acetate and resuspended in 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, containing 0.1% Triton X-100, 5 mM EDTA, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Half of each sample was incubated with 10 milliunits/ml heparan sulfate lyase and 25 milliunits/ml chondroitin sulfate lyase ABC (Seikagaku America Inc., Rockville, MD) for 2 h at 37 °C. Enzyme-treated samples (0.5 and 2.5 ml of conditioned media equivalent for syndecan-1 and -4, respectively) were subjected to SDS-PAGE (3.5-20% gradient gel) with a discontinuous buffer system (69), and electrotransferred to Immobilon-N. The membrane was processed as for the dot immunoassay; syndecan-1 and -4 core proteins were detected using mAb 281-2 and antisera MSE-4, respectively, followed by ECL detection. Wound fluid (day 1 and 3) was immunoprecipitated using antiserum against the human syndecan-1 ectodomain (HSE-1), or a mixture of mAbs against the human syndecan-4 ectodomain (5G9 and 8C7). The protein A immune complexes were subjected to SDS-PAGE (3.5-20% gradient gel) and electrotransferred to Immobilon-N. A431 human squamous cell carcinoma cell conditioned media (day 3), partially purified by QAE-Sephadex A-25 (Pharmacia) and cesium chloride density gradient separation (33), was run as a control. Syndecan-1 and -4 were detected by ECL using HSE-1 or mAbs 5G9 and 8C7, respectively.

Northern Blot Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from approximately 1 × 106 cells by resuspension in guanidinium denaturation solution, phenol/chloroform extraction, and isopropyl alcohol precipitation as described in the Ambion Totally RNA isolation kit (Austin, TX). RNA was separated in a 1% agarose, 0.6% formaldehyde gel, transferred to Nytran membranes using the Turboblotter (Schleicher & Schuell Inc.), and UV cross-linked. Membranes were prehybridized and hybridized in QuikHyb (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) at 68 °C for 2 h with 1-2 × 106 cpm/ml of a BamHI-EcoRI fragment of the mouse syndecan-1 cDNA (26). Blots were washed twice at room temperature with 2 × SSPE, 0.1% SDS followed by two washes at 65 °C in 0.2 × SSPE with 0.5% SDS and exposed to film (X-Omat AR; Eastman Kodak) with an intensifying screen at -80 °C. The membranes were rehybridized with a 32P-labeled 800-base pair PstI fragment of the mouse beta -actin probe provided by Dr. Stella Kourembanas (Childrens Hospital, Boston, MA) to quantitate the relative amount of RNA per lane. Results were quantified by densitometric scanning (Hewlett Packard Scan Jet IIC) using area measurements from NIH Image, version 1.57.


RESULTS

Agents Involved in Response to Tissue Injury Accelerate Syndecan-1 and -4 Shedding from Cultured Cells

We assessed whether agents known to be involved in wound repair regulate the shedding of syndecan ectodomains from the cell surface. SVEC4-10 cells, a mouse SV40 transformed endothelial cell line, were used as a test cell line (36). These cells were chosen because they remain viable in the presence or absence of serum, express both syndecan-1 and -4, and shed the ectodomains of these syndecans at a low basal rate.

Shedding was assayed by measuring the appearance in the culture media of immunoreactive syndecan ectodomains. Shed proteoglycans are not endocytosed by these cells during a 16-h incubation and thus are stable within the conditioned medium (data not shown). NMuMG mouse mammary epithelial cells were previously shown to shed the syndecan-1 ectodomain by demonstrating that the material in conditioned media (i) migrated as a GAG-free core protein at the same Mr as the trypsin-released ectodomain (25) but smaller than the transmembrane proteoglycan (37), and (ii) failed to react with an antibody directed against the cytoplasmic domain (26). We confirmed these results for syndecan-1 and -4 shed into conditioned media by SVEC4-10 cells in the presence or absence of serum. Proteoglycans in conditioned media and RIPA cell lysates were partially purified as described under "Experimental Procedures," treated with lyases to remove GAG chains, and subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred to cationic polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. As expected, the glycosaminoglycan-free core proteins derived from the conditioned media were smaller than those from lysates (data not shown). The proteoglycans were immobilized on cationic membranes and probed with core protein-specific antibodies directed against the ectodomains and the cytoplasmic domains (Fig. 1). Antibodies against the syndecan-1 and -4 ectodomains detected these proteoglycans in cell lysates and conditioned media, as expected. Antibodies against the cytoplasmic domains detected proteoglycans in the cell lysates, but failed to detect proteoglycans in conditioned media, indicating that these are the ectodomains.


Fig. 1. Syndecans shed from cultured endothelial cells are ectodomains. Proteoglycans partially purified from lysates and conditioned media (CM) of SVEC4-10 mouse endothelial cells cultured for 3 days in the presence of serum were applied to Immobilon-N membranes and analyzed by dot blot using ECL detection. Blots carrying increasing amounts of lysate (2, 5, 10, and 20 µl) and CM (0.1, 0.2, 0.5, and 1.0 ml), prepared as described under "Experimental Procedures," were probed with antibodies specific for the ectodomains of mouse syndecan-1 (mAb 281-2) and -4 (antiserum MSE-4) (Antibody = Ectodomain). Syndecan cytoplasmic domains were assessed using serum antibodies that recognize the syndecan-1 (S7C) and -4 (SCD-4) cytoplasmic domains (Antibody: Cytoplasmic).
[View Larger Version of this Image (40K GIF file)]

We first examined the effect of various agents on syndecan shedding by SVEC4-10 cells during a 16-h incubation in the presence and absence of 5% fetal calf serum. Basal shedding of syndecan-1 and -4 was barely detectable, but shedding was markedly increased by PMA treatment (Fig. 2), as described previously (27). Both EGF and HB-EGF (10 ng/ml) accelerated shedding, however, vascular endothelial cell growth factor 165, FGF-2, platelet-derived growth factor AB, TGFbeta , and TNFalpha (10 ng/ml) did not (Fig. 2, and data not shown). This growth factor-accelerated shedding was unaffected by incubation of the cells in serum-containing medium. Both thrombin and plasmin accelerate shedding, but urokinase-type plasminogen activator did not (Fig. 3). This protease-accelerated shedding was completely inhibited by incubation of the cells in serum-containing media.


Fig. 2. Growth factors accelerate syndecan shedding. SVEC4-10 cells were incubated for 16 h with PMA (0.5 µM) or growth factors (10 ng/ml) in the presence of 5% fetal calf serum. Conditioned media were harvested and proteoglycans partially purified by application to cationic membranes were analyzed by dot blot. Syndecan-1 and -4 were detected by ECL using mAb 281-2 and MSE-4 antiserum, respectively. The PMA-treated samples are from a different experiment than the growth factor-treated samples. VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
[View Larger Version of this Image (57K GIF file)]


Fig. 3. Proteases accelerate syndecan shedding. SVEC4-10 cells were incubated for 16 h with plasmin, thrombin, or urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) (5 mg/ml) in the absence or presence of 5% fetal calf serum. Conditioned media were analyzed by dot blot for syndecan-1 and -4 ectodomains as in Fig. 2.
[View Larger Version of this Image (48K GIF file)]

All members of the EGF family tested accelerated the shedding of syndecan-1 and -4 from SVEC4-10 cells (Figs. 4, A and B). EGF was the most potent while amphiregulin was the least potent. Amphiregulin, FGF-2, and HB-EGF bind heparin; this binding does not appear to influence whether syndecans are shed in response to growth factors.


Fig. 4. EGF family members accelerate syndecan shedding. SVEC4-10 cells were incubated for 16 h with EGF, HB-EGF, TGF-alpha , or amphiregulin in medium containing 5% fetal calf serum. Syndecan-1 (A) and syndecan-4 (B) in the media were assayed by dot blot as in Fig. 2. The results are expressed as the amount of syndecan shed in AU measured by densitometry with values normalized for µg cellular protein. Each point represents the mean ± S.D. of triplicate determinations. All growth factor treatments showed a significant increase in shed syndecan compared with untreated controls (p < 0.01).
[View Larger Version of this Image (20K GIF file)]

Thus, shedding of syndecan-1 and -4 appears to be a regulated process. PMA and only certain proteases and growth factors accelerate shedding from SVEC4-10 cells and shedding of both proteoglycans is affected similarly. Shedding accelerated by proteases is inhibited by serum, suggesting that serum contains inhibitors which prevent proteolytic scission of the core protein. On the other hand, PMA and growth factor accelerated shedding is not altered by incubation with serum, suggesting a different mechanism.

Accelerated Shedding Yields the Same Size Ectodomain Core Proteins

To evaluate whether the shed ectodomains differ in size when released from SVEC4-10 cells by distinct agents, cells were incubated for 16 h with various accelerating agents in the absence of serum. The media were harvested, proteoglycans were precipitated with ethanol, and incubated with heparitinase and chondroitinase ABC, applied to SDS-PAGE, and the ectodomain core proteins analyzed by Western blots. The GAG-free syndecan-1 and -4 ectodomain core proteins (Figs. 5, A and B) were the same size regardless whether shed at a basal rate, or accelerated by PMA, thrombin, EGF or HB-EGF, or TGF-alpha . These results suggest that the shedding mechanism yields the same size product whether shed constitutively or by a phorbol ester, protease, or growth factor.


Fig. 5. Accelerated shedding of syndecans is due to release of the ectodomains. SVEC4-10 cells were incubated for 16 h with PMA, thrombin, or EGF family growth factors in the absence of serum at the concentrations indicated in Figs. 2 and 3. Equal amounts of conditioned media were precipitated with ethanol, dissolved, and incubated with heparitinase (10 milliunits/ml) and chondroitinase ABC (25 milliunits/ml) for 2 h at 37 °C to remove GAG chains. Samples were run on gradient SDS-PAGE and the syndecan-1 (A) and syndecan-4 (B) ectodomain core proteins detected by Western blot analysis and ECL using mAb 281-2 or MSE-4 antiserum, respectively.
[View Larger Version of this Image (41K GIF file)]

Accelerated Shedding of Syndecans by Thrombin Is Receptor-mediated

Because the thrombin-released ectodomain was the same Mr as ectodomains released by other agents, we assessed whether syndecan shedding accelerated by thrombin may result from thrombin receptor activation rather than direct proteolytic cleavage. Increasing thrombin concentrations significantly enhanced (p < 0.01) syndecan-1 ectodomain but reduced syndecan-4 ectodomain levels in the culture media (Figs. 6, A and B), suggesting proteolytic degradation of the syndecan-4 ectodomain. Thrombin receptor activation requires the serine protease activity of its ligand, thrombin (38). Therefore, cells were treated with TRAP, a 14-amino acid peptide which directly activates the thrombin receptor and has no inherent proteolytic activity (40). TRAP treatment caused a significant increase (p < 0.01) in the levels of both the shed syndecan-1 and syndecan-4 ectodomains in the culture media (Figs. 6, A and B). Thus, direct activation of the thrombin receptor can accelerate syndecan-1 and -4 shedding.


Fig. 6. TRAP accelerates shedding of syndecan ectodomains. SVEC4-10 cells were incubated for 16 h with the indicated amounts of thrombin or TRAP in media containing 1% FCS. Syndecan-1 (A) and syndecan-4 (B) ectodomains in the conditioned media were assayed by dot blot analysis as in Fig. 2. Quantitation was done as in Fig. 4 and each point represents the mean ± S.D. (n = 3).
[View Larger Version of this Image (19K GIF file)]

Accelerated Shedding of Syndecans by TRAP and EGF Involves Receptor Signaling

The kinetics of accelerated shedding were assessed during the initial 8 h of TRAP- and EGF-accelerated shedding. Accelerated shedding of syndecan-1 and-4 was detected as early as 1 h following treatment with either agent and the amount of shed syndecan-1 (Fig. 7A) and syndecan-4 (Fig. 7B) increased with time at a nearly linear rate. Similar responses were seen when NMuMG mouse mammary epithelial cells were used in these assays (data not shown).


Fig. 7. EGF- and TRAP-accelerated shedding is receptor mediated. SVEC4-10 cells were treated with or without EGF (10 ng/ml) or TRAP (100 µM) in the presence or absence of genistein (5 µg/ml) in media containing 1% FCS over an 8-h period. Conditioned media were harvested at the indicated times and assayed for syndecan-1 (A) and syndecan-4 (B) ectodomains by dot blot analysis as in Fig. 2. Quantitation was as in Fig. 4. Each point represents the mean ± S.D. (n = 3).
[View Larger Version of this Image (43K GIF file)]

To determine whether these agents accelerate syndecan shedding by activating receptor signaling, we tested whether tyrosine kinase inhibitors affected shedding. Genistein, a specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor (39) reduced both TRAP- and EGF-accelerated shedding of syndecan-1 (Fig. 7A) and syndecan-4 (Fig. 7B). Similar results were obtained with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors tyrphostin 25 and methyl 2,5-dihydroxycinnamate (data not shown). Thus, tyrosine phosphorylation is involved in accelerating the shedding of syndecan-1 and -4 from the cell surface.

Receptor-mediated acceleration of syndecan shedding could be due to several possible mechanisms. Thus, we assessed levels of cell surface syndecan-1 and syndecan-1 mRNA during the initial 8 h of TRAP- and EGF-accelerated shedding. The conditioned media of EGF-treated and TRAP-treated cells accumulated 2- and 3-fold more syndecan-1 ectodomain than untreated cells over an 8-h period, respectively (Fig. 8A). During this time, there was no detectable change in the levels of cell surface proteoglycan (Fig. 8B). The levels of syndecan-1 mRNA did not increase (Fig. 8C) during accelerated shedding. These results suggest that accelerated shedding is accompanied by increased syndecan turnover at the cell surface. Furthermore, no change in SVEC4-10 or NMuMG cell morphology occurred during accelerated shedding, an observation which implies that the cells have retained at least 50% of their cell surface syndecan-1 during accelerated shedding (46).


Fig. 8. EGF- and TRAP-accelerated shedding is accompanied by increased turnover at the cell surface. SVEC4-10 cells were treated with EGF (10 ng/ml) or TRAP (100 µM) in media containing 1% FCS over an 8-h period. Conditioned media were harvested, cells were trypsinized to release the ectodomain from cell surface syndecan-1, and RNA was extracted from cells as detailed under "Experimental Procedures." A, conditioned media; and B, trypsinates were assayed for syndecan-1 ectodomains by dot blot analysis as in Fig. 2. Quantitation was as in Fig. 4 and each point represents the mean ± S.D. (n = 3). C, syndecan-1 mRNA was assayed by Northern blot analysis and autoradiography using a mouse syndecan-1 probe (26). Syndecan-1 mRNA levels were quantified by densitometric scanning and analyzed with NIH Image software. Results are expressed as syndecan-1 mRNA level relative to the level of beta -actin mRNA.
[View Larger Version of this Image (26K GIF file)]

Syndecan-1 and -4 Ectodomains Are Detected in Wound Fluid

During cutaneous wound repair in the mouse, keratinocytes migrating into the wound transiently lose syndecan-1. Concurrently, syndecan-1 is transiently induced on the endothelial cells and syndecan-4 on the dermal fibroblasts that comprise the forming granulation tissue (11, 12). Furthermore, plasmin, thrombin, and EGF family members, accelerators of syndecan-1 and -4 shedding from cultured SVEC4-10 cells, are known to operate during acute wound repair (1). Thus, we examined whether the fluids accumulating in acute wounds contained syndecan-1 and -4. Human dermal wound fluids were immunoprecipitated using antiserum HSE-1 or mAbs specific for the human syndecan-4 ectodomain (5G9 and 8C7) and the precipitates run on PAGE and analyzed by Western blots. Both precipitates contained materials that migrated as proteoglycans (Fig. 9A). Interestingly, the syndecan-1 immunoprecipitate contained both a proteoglycan smear and a lower Mr smear. The latter may represent partially degraded syndecan-1.


Fig. 9. Syndecan-1 and -4 ectodomains are in human wound fluid. A, acute dermal wound fluid was immunoprecipitated using antiserum against the human syndecan-1 ectodomain (HSE-1, lane 1), or a mixture of mAbs against the human syndecan-4 ectodomain (5G9 and 8C7, lane 3) and analyzed by Western blots. Partially purified A431 human squamous cell carcinoma cell conditioned media was run as a control (lanes 2 and 4). Syndecan-1 and -4 ectodomains were detected by ECL using HSE-1 or mAbs 5G9 and 8C7, respectively. B, proteoglycans in human plasma and dermal wound fluids (day 1 and 2) were applied to Immobilon-N membranes and analyzed for the presence of syndecan-1 and -4 ectodomains by dot blot using HSE-1 antiserum and mAbs 5G9 and 8C7 (Antibody: Ectodomain). Syndecan cytoplasmic domains were assessed using serum antibodies against the syndecan-1 (S7C) and syndecan-4 (SCD-4) cytoplasmic domains (Antibody: Cytoplasmic).
[View Larger Version of this Image (47K GIF file)]

To determine whether the wound fluid syndecans were the transmembrane proteoglycans or the ectodomains, the wound fluid proteoglycans were partially purified on cationic polyvinylidene difluoride membranes and probed with antibodies against the ectodomains and cytoplasmic domains as in Fig. 1. Antibodies against the syndecan-1 and -4 ectodomains detected proteoglycans in acute wound fluids, but not in plasma (Fig. 9B). In contrast, antibodies against the cytoplasmic domains failed to detect these proteoglycans (Fig. 9B). Thus, the syndecans in wound fluid are the ectodomains, likely shed from cell surfaces.


DISCUSSION

In this study we show that thrombin, plasmin, and members of the EGF family accelerate shedding of the syndecan-1 and -4 ectodomains from cultured endothelial cell surfaces, and that activation of at least two distinct receptor classes (thrombin (G-protein linked) and EGF (tyrosine kinase)) regulate syndecan shedding. Regulation of syndecan shedding appears to be physiologically relevant because EGF and thrombin receptors are both activated during wound repair, and we find the shed syndecan-1 and -4 ectodomains in the fluid that accumulates within acute dermal wounds. Because syndecan shedding is accelerated by multiple effectors that act directly or via receptors, these cell surface proteoglycans likely have additional physiological roles as soluble paracrine effectors.

Syndecan Ectodomains Are Shed

Syndecan-1 and -4 are transmembrane proteoglycans but are released both into conditioned media and wound fluid as soluble proteoglycans. Their electrophoretic migration, presence of extracellular epitopes and absence of cytoplasmic domains demonstrate that the syndecans recovered from the conditioned media and wound fluid correspond to the intact ectodomains. Thus, shedding appears to result from a proteolytic process but the precise location of the cleavage site will require analysis of the amino- or carboxyl-terminal sequences of the cleavage products. Several different cleavage sites have been shown for shedding of other transmembrane proteins (18). Interestingly, the structure of syndecan-1 and -4 differ in several aspects that are potentially important for shedding, including the number and types of basic residues adjacent to the extracellular leaflet of the plasma membrane. Yet these proteoglycans responded similarly in this study to agents that accelerate shedding.

Shedding of Syndecan Ectodomains Is Regulated by Physiological Effectors

Syndecan-1 and -4 belong to the class of transmembrane proteins which undergo proteolytic cleavage and release of their ectodomains into the extracellular milieu when cells are treated with protein kinase C activators. The syndecan-1 ectodomain is shed from cultured adherent cells at a basal rate, but this shedding is markedly enhanced by suspension of the cells (25) or phorbol ester activators of protein kinase C (27). Trypsin treatment also releases the intact syndecan-1 ectodomain from cell surfaces (33). We now find that thrombin or plasmin releases the syndecan-1 and -4 ectodomain from cell surfaces, and this shedding is inhibited by serum. Thrombin-accelerated shedding was less evident with syndecan-4, presumably because the syndecan-4 ectodomain is more susceptible to proteolytic degradation than the syndecan-1 ectodomain. Thrombin receptor activation requires the serine protease activity of its ligand, thrombin (38). Thus, we tested whether the thrombin receptor agonist peptide, TRAP, which directly activates the receptor (40), also accelerates shedding. TRAP accelerated the shedding of both syndecan-1 and -4 ectodomains. Serum prevented thrombin-accelerated shedding, suggesting that serum inhibits the protease activity required for receptor activation. However, TRAP activation of the receptor does not involve protease activity and TRAP-accelerated shedding is not inhibited by serum. Thrombin may accelerate shedding both via direct proteolytic cleavage of the syndecan core protein and receptor activation.

Each member of the EGF family of growth factors tested accelerated the shedding of syndecan-1 and -4 ectodomains from SVEC4-10 cells. Each of these growth factors interacts with EGFR-1. Activity was independent of the growth factor's ability to bind heparin. A variety of other growth factors, including vascular endothelial cell growth factor 165, FGF-2, platelet-derived growth factor AB, TGFbeta , and TNFalpha failed to accelerate syndecan shedding from these cells, implying that growth factor-induced shedding from these cells is selective.

Accelerated Shedding Is Receptor Mediated

Shedding of the syndecan ectodomains is accelerated by cell suspension, proteases, direct PKC activation by phorbol esters, and specific ligand interactions with the thrombin and EGF receptors. The specific ligand interactions likely involve receptor activation because three tyrosine kinase inhibitors, genistein, tyrphostin 25, and methyl 2,5-dihydroxycinnamate, inhibit both EGF and TRAP accelerated shedding of syndecan-1 and -4 ectodomains. Because the inhibition is partial, multiple intracellular processes, some involving tyrosine kinases and others not, are likely involved in this regulated shedding process. Although we cannot rule out the possibility of indirect effects of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors, our results support a role for tyrosine phosphorylation in accelerated syndecan shedding.

The EGF receptor is a single-pass transmembrane protein which undergoes dimerization and autophosphorylation at tyrosine residues, and can transphosphorylate (41, 42). The thrombin receptor is a seven-pass transmembrane protein that is coupled to GTP-binding (G) proteins (43). Activation of either receptor can induce a phosphorylation/dephosphorylation cascade, activate phospholipase Cgamma , alter intracellular calcium concentrations, enhance diacylglycerol production and thus stimulate PKC, which is known to accelerate syndecan shedding (27). The common theme of these signaling cascades is change in the levels of serine and/or tyrosine phosphorylation. However, the site(s) of phosphorylation that may augment this shedding is unknown. Thus, syndecan shedding involves several effectors and at least two distinct classes of cell surface receptors. The susceptibility of syndecan shedding to multiple effectors that act directly or via receptors implies that the ectodomains of these cell surface molecules have physiological roles as soluble proteoglycans.

EGF or TRAP enhances the shedding of syndecan-1 and -4 ectodomains within 1-2 h of treatment. However, at least for TRAP-accelerated shedding, the amount of shed proteoglycan cannot be accounted for by a change in the level of cell surface proteoglycan. Thus, as shedding proceeds, the turnover of syndecan-1 at the cell surface may also increase. The syndecan-1 mRNA level is also unchanged, suggesting that the translation rate increases and/or an intracellular pool is depleted. Our results suggest that these cells maintain a steady state level of cell surface syndecan-1 during accelerated shedding. This could account for the lack of apparent change in cell morphology during accelerated shedding, since a marked reduction in cell surface syndecan-1 is accompanied by change in cell shape, rearranged beta 1 integrins, and disorganization of the actin cytoskeleton (44-46). Such regulation of cell surface syndecan may enable cells to retain their adhesive phenotype while shedding is accelerated.

Our finding that syndecan shedding is accelerated by multiple effectors that act through receptor-mediated events at the cell surface is consistent with the involvement of the common system proposed to regulate shedding of a heterogeneous group of transmembrane proteins (24). This system responds to multiple activators, induces cleavage of ectodomains at diverse sequences, and is inhibited by zinc ion chelators, suggesting the action of membrane-associated metalloproteinases. Whether syndecan shedding follows this same proposed mechanisms remains to be determined.

Receptor-mediated Syndecan Shedding Is Relevant to Wound Repair

The syndecan-1 and -4 ectodomains were readily detected in human dermal wound fluid on day 1 and 2 after wounding. These syndecan ectodomains were not detected in human plasma, indicating that they likely arose in the wound environment as a result of the injury. Syndecans in wound fluids had a relatively high average Mr, similar to that from mesenchymal cells (8, 14), possibly reflecting the cell type(s) from which they are derived. Syndecan-1 from keratinocytes has a lower Mr than from mesenchymal cells or other epithelial cells (14), implying that the endothelial and/or fibroblastic cells at the wound site may be the source of the shed syndecan ectodomains. The shed ectodomains may also undergo partial degradation by proteases and/or heparanases in wound fluid (1).

The effectors that accelerate syndecan shedding are known to act during acute wound repair. Tissue injury is accompanied by cell disruption, activation of proteases, and release of growth factors, each of which accelerates syndecan shedding. The accelerated shedding that accompanies cell suspension (25) could involve member(s) of the ADAMS family, widely expressed transmembrane proteins that contain both metalloproteinase and potential integrin binding domains (47). Both thrombin and plasmin, formed during the blood coagulation process, the initial event in tissue injury, can accelerate shedding. However, the formation and activity of these proteases is tightly regulated, and their ability to accelerate shedding may be limited in the presence of fluid phase protease inhibitors such as alpha 2-macroglobulin, antithrombin III, and alpha 2-antiplasmin. Indeed, in the presence of serum, shedding by plasmin and thrombin from SVEC4-10 cells was inhibited. However, the platelet activation and aggregation which occurs with hemostasis rapidly releases many mediators into the wound, including EGF, HB-EGF, and TGF-alpha (1). The shedding activity of these growth factors is not inhibited by serum components. Interestingly, several other transmembrane proteins released by the common shedding system are also involved in the response to tissue injury. These proteins include the receptors for TNF-alpha (48, 49), CSF-1 (50), interleukin-6 (24, 51, 52), and the growth factors/cytokines TNF-alpha (53-56), CSF-1 (57, 58), TGF-alpha (23, 24, 59, 60), and HB-EGF (61), and the cell adhesion molecules V-CAM (62), E- and L-selectin (24, 63-65). Hence, activation of this common shedding system may be a component of wound repair.

The conversion of cell surface syndecans into soluble proteoglycans during wound repair introduces anionic, multivalent molecules into the wound environment. The significance of the regulated conversion of membrane-anchored factors into soluble effectors has been emphasized for cell adhesion molecules, growth factors, and growth factor receptors (18-20, 66, 67). Especially important are findings, as with CSF-1, TNF-alpha , TGF-alpha , and HB-EGF, which show that the function of the transmembrane protein may differ from that of its soluble counterpart. The function of the syndecans as co-receptors for a large number of physiological effectors is instantly changed when the syndecan is released from the cell surface. Indeed, this change in physical location can cause the soluble syndecan to compete for the same ligands for which it was a co-receptor at the cell surface (68).


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by National Institutes of Health predoctoral training Grant 5T32NS07264-13 (to M. F.), National Institutes of Health training Grant HD07466 (to S. S.), and National Institutes of Health Grants CA28735, HD06763, and HL46491 (to M. B.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    Contributed equally to the results in this report.
§   To whom correspondence should be addressed: Joint Program in Neonatology, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115. Tel.: 617-355-6366; Fax: 617-355-7677; E-mail: bernfield{at}a1.tch.harvard.edu.
1   The abbreviations used are: HB-EGF, heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor; EGF, epidermal growth factor; FGF-2, fibroblast growth factor-2; TGF-alpha , transforming growth factor-alpha ; TGF-beta , transforming growth factor-beta ; TNF-alpha , tumor necrosis factor-alpha ; FCS, fetal calf serum; GAG, glycosaminoglycan; PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; TRAP, thrombin receptor agonist peptide; TPCK, L-1-tosylamido-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone; CM, conditioned medium; HSE-1, serum antibody against human syndecan-1 ectodomain; AU, absorbance unit(s); PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; mAbs, monoclonal antibody.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Shuyuan Zhao, Dmitry Leyfer, and Elena Shneider for technical assistance and Drs. Huiming Wang and John Lincecum for help with preparation of the figures. We also thank Dr. Elof Eriksson for providing wound fluid samples.


REFERENCES

  1. Clark, R. A. F., and Henson, P. M. (eds) (1996) The Molecular and Cellular Biology of Wound Repair, Plenum Press, New York
  2. Bernfield, M., Hinkes, M. T., and Gallo, R. L. (1993) Dev. Suppl. 205-212
  3. Bourin, M. C., and Lindahl, U. (1993) Biochem. J. 289, 313-330 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Gallo, R. L., and Bernfield, M. (1995) in Molecular and Cellular Biology of Wound Repair (Clark, R. A., ed), 2nd Ed., pp. 475-492, Plenum, New York
  5. Jalkanen, M., Jalkanen, S., and Bernfield, M. (1991) in Biology of Extracellular Matrix. Receptors for Extracellular Matrix Proteins (Mecham, R. P., and McDonald, J. A., eds), Vol. VII, pp. 1-37, Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, FL
  6. Bernfield, M., Kokenyesi, R., Kato, M., Hinkes, M. T., Spring, J., Gallo, R. L., and Lose, E. J. (1992) Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 8, 365-398 [CrossRef]
  7. Kim, C. W., Goldberger, O. A., Gallo, R. L., and Bernfield, M. (1994) Mol. Biol. Cell 5, 797-805 [Abstract]
  8. Kato, M., Wang, H., Bernfield, M., Gallagher, J. T., and Turnbull, J. E. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 18881-18890 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Sanderson, R. D., Turnbull, J. E., Gallagher, J. T., and Lander, A. D. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 13100-13106 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Inki, P., and Jalkanen, M. (1996) Ann. Med. 28, 63-67 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Elenius, K., Vainio, S., Laato, M., Salmivirta, M., Thesleff, I., and Jalkanen, M. (1991) J. Cell Biol. 114, 585-595 [Abstract]
  12. Gallo, R., Kim, C., Kokenyesi, R., Adzick, N. S., and Bernfield, M. (1996) J. Invest. Dermatol. 107, 676-683 [Abstract]
  13. Gallo, R. L., Ono, M., Povsic, T., Page, C., Eriksson, E., Klagsbrun, M., and Bernfield, M. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 11035-11039 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Sanderson, R. D., and Bernfield, M. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 9562-9566 [Abstract]
  15. Vainio, S., Jalkanen, M., Vaahtokari, A., Sahlberg, C., Mali, M., Bernfield, M., and Thesleff, I. (1991) Dev. Biol. 147, 322-333 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Sanderson, R. D., Hinkes, M. T., and Bernfield, M. (1992) J. Invest. Dermatol. 99, 1-7
  17. Yeaman, C., and Rapraeger, A. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 122, 941-950 [Abstract]
  18. Ehlers, M. R., and Riordan, J. F. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 10065-10074 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Massagué, J., and Pandiella, A. (1993) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 62, 515-541 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Rose-John, S., and Heinrich, P. C. (1994) Biochem. J. 300, 281-290 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Marikovsky, M., Brueing, K., Liu, P. Y., Eriksson, E., Higashiyama, S., Farber, P., Abraham, J., and Klagsbrun, M. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 3889-3893 [Abstract]
  22. Pandiella, A., and Massagué, J. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 5769-5773 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Arribas, J., and Massagué, J. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 128, 433-441 [Abstract]
  24. Arribas, J., Coodly, L., Vollmer, P., Kishimoto, T. K., Rose-John, S., and Massagué, J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 11376-11382 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Jalkanen, M., Rapraeger, A., Saunders, S., and Bernfield, M. (1987) J. Cell Biol. 105, 3087-3096 [Abstract]
  26. Saunders, S., Jalkanen, M., O'Farrell, S., and Bernfield, M. (1989) J. Cell Biol. 108, 1547-1556 [Abstract]
  27. Fitzgerald, M. L., Chun, J.-S., and Bernfield, M. (1994) Mol. Biol. Cell 5, (suppl.) 312a
  28. Spring, J., Paine-Saunders, S. E., Hynes, R. O., and Bernfield, M. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 3334-3338 [Abstract]
  29. Roark, E. F., Paradies, N. E., Lagunowich, L. A., and Grunwald, G. B. (1992) Development 114, 973-984 [Abstract]
  30. Cabrera, N., Diaz-Rodriguez, E., Becker, E., Martin-Zanca, D., and Pandiella, A. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 132, 427-436 [Abstract]
  31. Levine, S. L., Logun, C., Chopra, D. P., Rhim, J. S., and Shelhamner, J. H. (1996) Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 14, 254-261 [Abstract]
  32. Jalkanen, M., Nguyen, H., Rapraeger, A., Kurn, N., and Bernfield, M. (1985) J. Cell Biol. 101, 976-984 [Abstract]
  33. Rapraeger, A., and Bernfield, M. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 4103-4109 [Abstract]
  34. Grinnell, F., Ho, C., and Wysocki, A. (1992) J. Invest. Dermatol. 98, 410-416 [Abstract]
  35. Wysocki, A. B., Staiano-Coico, L., and Grinnell, F. (1993) J. Invest. Dermatol. 101, 64-68 [Abstract]
  36. O'Connell, K. A., and Edidin, M. (1990) J. Immunol. 144, 521-525 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Rapraeger, A., Jalkanen, M., and Bernfield, M. (1987) in Biology of Extracellular Matrix, Biology of Proteoglycans (Wight, R. N., and Mecham, R. P., eds), Vol. II, pp. 129-154, Mercel Dekker, Inc., Academic Press, New York
  38. Vu, T. H., Hung, D. T., Wheaton, V. I., and Coughlin, S. R. (1991) Cell 64, 1057-1068 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Akiyama, T., Ishida, J., Nakagawa, S., Ogawara, H., Watanabe, S., Itoh, N., Shibuya, M., and Fukami, Y. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 5592-5595 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Troyer, D., Padilla, R., Smith, T., Kreisberg, J., and Glass, W., II (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 20126-20131 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Schlessinger, J., and Ullrich, A. (1992) Neuron 9, 383-391 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Earp, H. S., Dawson, T. L., Li, X., and Yu, H. (1995) Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 35, 115-132 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Dennington, P. M., and Berndt, M. C. (1994) Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 21, 349-358 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Leppä, S., Härkönen, D., and Jalkanen, M. (1991) Cell Regul. 2, 1-11 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Leppä, S., Mali, M., Miettinen, H., and Jalkanen, M. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 932-936 [Abstract]
  46. Kato, M., Saunders, S., Nguyen, H., and Bernfield, M. (1995) Mol. Biol. Cell 6, 559-576 [Abstract]
  47. Wolfsberg, T. G., and White, J. M. (1996) Dev. Biol. 180, 389-401 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Brakebusch, C., Varfolomeev, E. E., Batkin, M., and Wallach, D. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 32488-32496 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Crowe, P. D., Walter, B. N., Mohler, K. M., Otten-Evans, C., Black, R. A., and Ware, C. F. (1995) J. Exp. Med. 181, 1205-1210 [Abstract]
  50. Downing, J. R., Royssel, M. F., and Sherr, C. J. (1989) Mol. Cell. Biol. 9, 2890-2896 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  51. Müllberg, J., Oberthür, W., Lottspeich, F., Mehl, E., Dittrich, E., Graeve, L., Heinrich, P. C., and Rose-John, S. (1994) J. Immunol. 152, 4958-4968 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Müllberg, J., Durie, F. H., Otten-Evans, C., Alderson, M. R., Rose-John, S., Cosman, D., Black, R. A., and Mohler, K. M. (1995) J. Immunol. 155, 5198-5205 [Abstract]
  53. Perez, C., Albert, I., DeFay, K., Zachariades, N., Gooding, L., and Kriegler, M. (1990) Cell 63, 251-258 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  54. Gearing, A. J. H., Beckett, P., Christodoulou, M., Churchill, M., Clements, J., Davidson, A. H., Drummond, A. H., Galloway, W. A., Gilbert, R., Gordon, J. L., Leber, T. M., Mangan, M., Miller, K., Nayee, P., Owen, K., Patel, S., Thomas, W., Wells, G., Wood, L. M., and Woolley, K. (1994) Nature 370, 555-557 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  55. McGeehan, G. M., Becherer, J. D., Bast, R. C., Jr., Boyer, C. M., Champion, B., Connolly, K. M., Conway, J. G., Furdon, P., Karp, S., Kidao, S., McElroy, A. B., Nichols, J., Pryzwansky, K. M., Schoenen, F., Sekut, L., Truesdale, A., Verghjese, M., Warner, J., and Ways, J. P. (1994) Nature 370, 558-561 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. Mohler, K. M., Sleath, P. R., Fitzner, J. N., Cerretti, D. P., Alderson, M., Kerwar, S. S., Torrance, D. S., Otten-Evans, C., Greenstreet, T., Weerawarna, K., Kronheim, S. R., Petersen, M., Gerhart, M., Kozlosky, C. J., March, C. J., and Black, R. A. (1994) Nature 370, 218-220 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  57. Stein, J., and Rettenmier, C. W. (1991) Oncogene 6, 601-605 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  58. Deng, P., Rettenmier, C. W., and Pattengale, P. K. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 16338-16343 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Pandiella, A., Bosenberg, M. W., Huang, E. J., Besmer, P., and Massagué, J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 24028-24033 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Bosenberg, M. W., Pandiella, A., and Massagué, J. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 122, 95-101 [Abstract]
  61. Goishi, K., Higashiyama, S., Klagsbrun, M., Nakano, N., Umata, T., Ishikawa, M., Mekada, E., and Taniguchi, N. (1995) Mol. Biol. Cell 6, 967-980 [Abstract]
  62. Leca, G., Mansur, S. E., and Bensussan, A. (1995) J. Immunol. 154, 1069-1077 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Pigott, R., Dillon, L. P., Hemingway, I. H., and Gearing, A. J. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 187, 584-589 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  64. Kahn, J., Ingraham, R. H., Shirley, F., Migaki, G. I., and Kishimoto, T. K. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 125, 461-470 [Abstract]
  65. Feehan, C., Darlak, K., Kahn, J., Walcheck, B., Spatola, A. F., and Kishimoto, T. K. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 7019-7024 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Fernandez-Botran, R. (1991) FASEB J. 5, 2567-2574 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  67. Bosenberg, M. W., and Massagué, J. (1993) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 5, 832-838 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  68. Steinfeld, R., Van Den Berghe, H., and David, G. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 133, 405-416 [Abstract]
  69. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.