(Received for publication, July 22, 1996, and in revised form, January 10, 1997)
From Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
Interleukin-1-converting enzyme (ICE) is a
novel cysteine protease responsible for the cleavage of
pre-interleukin-1
(pre-IL-1
) to the mature cytokine and a member
of a family of related proteases (the caspases) that includes the
Caenorhabditis elegans cell death gene product, CED-3. In
addition to their sequence homology, these cysteine proteases display
an unusual substrate specificity for peptidyl sequences with a
P1 aspartate residue. We have examined the kinetics of
processing pre-IL-1
to the mature form by ICE and three of its
homologs, TX, CPP-32, and CMH-1. Of the ICE homologs, only TX processes
pre-IL-1
, albeit with a catalytic efficiency 250-fold less than ICE
itself. We also investigated the ability of these four proteases to
process poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, a DNA repair enzyme that is
cleaved within minutes of the onset of apoptosis. Every caspase
examined cleaves PARP, with catalytic efficiencies ranging from
2.3 × 106 M
1
s
1 for CPP32 to 1.0 × 103
M
1 s
1 for TX. In addition, we
report kinetic constants for several reversible inhibitors and
irreversible inactivators, which have been used to implicate one or
more caspases in the apoptotic proteolysis cascade. Ac-Asp-Glu-Val-Asp
aldehyde (DEVD-CHO) is a potent inhibitor of CPP-32 with a
Ki value of 0.5 nM, but is also potent as inhibitor of CMH-1 (Ki = 35 nM) and
ICE (Ki = 15 nM). The x-ray crystal
structure of DEVD-CHO complexed to ICE presented here reveals
electrostatic interactions not present in the Ac-YVAD-CHO co-complex
structure (Wilson, K. P., Black, J.-A. F., Thomson, J. A., Kim, E. E.,
Griffith, J. P., Navia, M. A., Murcko, M. A., Chambers, S. P., Aldape,
R. A., Raybuck, S. A., and Livingston, D. J. (1994) Nature
370, 270-275), accounting for the surprising potency of this
inhibitor against ICE.
ICE1 is the prototypical member of a
new family of mammalian cysteine proteases (the
caspases)2 that is distinct from
cysteine proteases in the papain superfamily (1-3). The
mutagenesis experiments and crystal structure reported by
Wilson et al. (4) revealed a different active site
geometry and catalytic mechanism for ICE than observed for papain. The structure of the ICE active site contains a Cys-His catalytic diad, and
two Arg residues that confer high selectivity for peptidyl substrates
with Asp residues at the P1 position (N-terminal to the
scissile bond) (4, 5). Although ICE has recently been reported to
cleave other proteins in vitro (6, 7), it was identified
from its essential role in processing the inactive 31-kDa precursor of
interleukin-1 (pre-IL-1
) to the mature 17-kDa cytokine (8).
In 1993, Yuan et al. (9) reported the sequence of the Caenorhabditis elegans programmed cell death gene ced-3. This gene is 29% identical to human ICE. Due to the central role of the CED-3 protein in C. elegans apoptosis, Yuan and colleagues deduced that ICE or ICE homologs might play a similar role in mammalian apoptosis. Overexpression of ICE in rat fibroblast, mammalian COS cells, and neuronal cell lines demonstrated that this protease can indeed induce apoptosis (6, 10, 11). Subsequently, Kuida et al. (12) confirmed an in vivo role for ICE in Fas-mediated apoptosis by disruption of the murine ICE gene.
A family of ICE-related proteases (the caspases) was discovered by searching human cDNA libraries for sequences homologous to ICE or ced-3 (13, 14). At present, at least 10 human homologs of ICE possessing cysteine protease activity have been identified. These homologs can be grouped by sequence similarity into three subfamilies. The most closely related homologs to ICE are TX (caspase-4, also denoted ICH-2 or ICErelII) (15-17) and TY (caspase-5, also denoted ICErelIII) (17, 18), which are 58 and 57% identical to ICE at the amino acid level. Another homolog, ICH-1 (caspase-2, corresponding to the murine Nedd-2 gene) (19, 20), is 20% identical to ICE and belongs to a distinct subfamily. A third group of homologs comprises proteins that show a higher sequence similarity to CED-3 than to ICE. These include CPP32 (caspase-3) (7, 21), MCH-2 (caspase-6) (22), and CMH-1 (caspase-7, also called MCH-3) (23, 24). Based in part on sequence similarity to the C. elegans gene and inhibition by a tetrapeptide aldehyde based on the PARP cleavage sequence (DEVD-CHO), CPP32 was claimed to be the caspase responsible for apoptosis in mammalian cells (25). The dependence of apoptosis in vivo on the presence of CPP32 remains to be confirmed, however, and the inhibition of other caspases by DEVD-CHO has not been addressed. Subsequent work has shown that pro-CPP32 is activated by other caspases during apoptosis (26, 27).
Although a thorough investigation of the kinetics of ICE has been
reported (28), little kinetic information on ICE homologs exists in the
literature. A rigorous kinetic analysis of these proteases is thus
essential to evaluate the putative differential substrate specificity
of these proteases (24, 25). For example, in contradistinction to the
claim by Nicholson et al. (25) that ICE is unable to cleave
poly(ADP-ribosyl) polymerase (PARP, a cellular enzyme cleaved during
apoptosis), we recently reported that ICE is fully competent to cleave
this substrate, albeit at enzyme concentrations higher than those
required for cleavage of pre-IL-1 (6). Indeed, every ICE homolog
identified is able to cleave PARP as a substrate (14), and the MCH-3
homolog appears to be more active in PARP cleavage than CPP32 itself
(24). Similarly, TX is able to cleave pre-IL-1
(16), but does so
inefficiently.
We have selected for our kinetic studies two members from the ICE subfamily (ICE and TX) and two members of the CPP32 subfamily (CMH-1/MCH-3 and CPP32). We report a kinetic analysis of substrate hydrolysis by these proteases and the inhibition constants for both reversible and irreversible peptidyl inhibitors. Such compounds have been used widely to study the role of caspases in apoptosis across a variety of cell lines (29-32). This report is the first comprehensive comparison of the proteolysis kinetics by multiple caspases.
Recombinant ICE and ICE Homologs
ICERecombinant human interleukin-1 convertase was
expressed from a p30 construct containing an N-terminal T7 tag in
Trichoplusia ni insect cells using a baculovirus expression
system. Active T7 ICE containing p20 and p10 subunits was purified from
the medium by affinity chromatography using an immobilized T7 antibody
column according to the manufacturer's protocol (Novagen). The
expression, purification, and characterization of this protein has been
published elsewhere (33).
Alternatively, ICE was expressed as a p32 construct in
Escherichia coli and purified as the inactive p30 precursor
from inclusion bodies using size-exclusion chromatography. Refolding
and subsequent autoprocessing was performed at a protein concentration
of 3 mg/ml in 25 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM DTT, pH 7.5, at 25 °C to give the active enzyme, which was immediately frozen in
10% glycerol at 78 °C (4). The kinetic parameters of the E. coli and baculovirus expressed ICE were similar, regardless of the
purification method used.
Quantification of active enzyme was performed with the irreversible inhibitor Z-Val-Ala-Asp-DCB under standard assay conditions using published methods (28). Kinetic parameters for the Suc-YVAD-pNA substrate under the assay conditions below are given in Table I.
|
A cDNA encoding the p30 form of human TX was obtained from C. Faucheu (Roussel Uclaf, Romainville, France) (15). An N-terminal T7-tagged TX fusion described previously (6) was similarly expressed in T. ni insect cells using the baculovirus expression system and purified from the medium using an immobilized T7 antibody column as described above. Active TX comprised two subunits of 24 and 10 kDa. Quantification of the active enzyme was performed with the irreversible inhibitor Z-Val-Ala-Asp-DCB. Kinetic parameters for the Suc-YVAD-pNA substrate under standard assay conditions are given in Table I.
CPP32The expression plasmid for N-terminally
(His)6-tagged wild type CPP32 lacking the prosequence was
constructed by introducing XhoI sites at the 5 and 3
ends
of CPP32 cDNAs by PCR using primers 5
-CGGCTGCAGCTCGAGTCTGGAATATCCCTGGACAACAGT and
5
-GGGAATTCTCGAGTTAGTGATAAAAATAGAGTTCTTTTGTGAGC and then
ligating the resulting XhoI fragments into a
XhoI-cut E. coli expression vector pET-15b
(Novagen). The resulting plasmids direct the synthesis of polypeptides
of 272 amino acids consisting of a 23-residue peptide
(MGSS
SSG
HMLE, where LVPRGS represents a thrombin cleavage site) fused in frame to the N terminus of CPP32 at Ser29, as confirmed by DNA sequencing and by
N-terminal sequencing of the expressed proteins. E. coli
strain BL21(DE3) carrying the plasmid (4000 ml) was induced with 0.8 mM isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside for
2 h at 30 °C, harvested, and lysed by microfluidization in 150 Buffer A (20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 8.2, 300 mM NaCl, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 10% glycerol,
0.4 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 2.5 µg/ml
leupeptin). Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 100,000 × g for 30 min, and the supernatant (S100) was loaded onto an
~1.8-ml nickel-NTA-agarose column. After washing with Buffer A
containing 25 mM imidazole, CPP32 protein was eluted with
100 mM imidazole in Buffer A. The eluate was desalted and applied onto a DEAE-Sepharose column in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH
8.8), washed with the same buffer containing 50 mM NaCl,
and eluted with the same buffer containing 100 mM NaCl.
SDS-PAGE analysis indicated that the purified protein contained two
major polypeptides of approximately 12 and 18 kDa, respectively,
representing the two subunits of the protease, as confirmed by
N-terminal sequencing.
Quantification of the active enzyme (10 nM) was performed
with the reversible inhibitor Ac-DEVD-CHO. Kinetic parameters for the
Ac-DEVD-AMC substrate under standard assay conditions are: Km = 10 µM and
kcat = 1.0 s1.
Recombinant human N-terminal (His)6-tagged CMH-1 (Ala24-Gln303) was expressed in E. coli and purified by affinity chromatography using a nickel-NTA column as described previously (23).
Quantification of the active enzyme (50 nM) was performed
with the potent reversible inhibitor Ac-DEVD-CHO. Kinetic parameters for the Ac-DEVD-AMC substrate under standard assay conditions are:
Km = 100 µM and
kcat = 0.4 s1.
Purification of Pre-IL-1
Recombinant pre-IL-1 was cloned and expressed in E. coli. Cell pellets (20 g) were resuspended in 100 ml of 10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, containing 0.05 M NaCl, 10%
glycerol, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF, 2 mM
EDTA and lysed by microfluidization. Cell extracts were prepared by
centrifugation at 4 °C, for 30 min at 35,000 × g.
Pre-IL-1
was extracted from the cell pellet with 100 ml of 10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, containing 0.05 M NaCl, 1 mM PMSF, 8 M urea and subsequently dialyzed
against the lysis buffer without PMSF. The urea extract was loaded on a
(3.5 × 26-mm) DEAE-Sephacel column, equilibrated in the same
buffer, washed with five column volumes of buffer, and the bound
protein was eluted with a linear gradient from 0.05 to 1 M
NaCl in 10 mM Tris, pH 8.1, 10% glycerol. Pre-IL-1
was detected in these fractions by SDS-PAGE and by Western blotting using a
monoclonal antibody generated against IL-1
(from M. DeCenzo, Vertex). Pre-IL-1
-containing fractions were concentrated by 40% ammonium sulfate precipitation. The subsequent pellet was solubilized in 10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, containing 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT, 0.5 M NaCl, 5% glycerol and loaded on
a Sephadex G-75 column (100 × 26 mm), calibrated, and
equilibrated in the same buffer. Pre-IL-1
eluted at an apparent
molecular mass of approximately 40 kDa. The sample was dialyzed against
10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, containing 0.1 M NaCl, 1 mM DTT and concentrated on a YM10 Amicon membrane. The
yield of purified material was 70%, and on Coomassie-stained gel
reduced pre-IL-1
migrated as a single band with a mobility
corresponding to 33 kDa.
Purification of Truncated Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase
The DNA binding domain of PARP containing an N-terminal T7 tag was expressed in E. coli. Cell pellets from 100-ml cultures were resuspended in lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaHSO3, 0.2 M NaCl, 10% glycerol, 5 mM DTT, 10 µg/ml pepstatin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 mM PMSF, and 1 mM benzamidine and disrupted in a microfluidizer. This suspension was centrifuged at 4 °C, 30 min at 35,000 × g. The cell pellet was solubilized in buffer (9 ml), containing 8 M urea, 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 50 mM NaHSO3, 0.2 M NaCl, 10% glycerol, and 5 mM DTT, and dialyzed stepwise against the same buffer without urea in 100-ml increments. The dialyzed sample was applied to a (1.8 × 26-mm) heparin-Sepharose column. The bound protein was eluted with a linear gradient from 0.2 to 1.2 M NaCl in the dialysis buffer at 0.35 M NaCl. Fractions were collected and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blot, using a monoclonal antibody against the T7 tag. The protein migrated as a single band of apparent molecular mass 45 kDa. The total amount of pure PARP recovered was 3 mg, which corresponds to 30% yield of purification.
In Vitro Cleavage of Pre-IL-1 and PARP by ICE and Homologs
35S-Labeled pre-IL-1 and PARP proteins, which
contain 12 and 11 methionine residues, respectively, were prepared by
in vitro transcription-translation (IVTT) using the TNT
T7-coupled reticulocyte lysate system (Promega) and
[35S]methionine (500 Ci/mmol, Amersham Corp.).
Cleavage experiments were performed using one or both of two methods. The first method, in which the amount of radioactivity per assay was kept constant, 35S-labeled substrate (40 nM/0.5 µCi) was incubated in reaction mixtures of 25 µl containing 10-40 nM enzyme and varying amounts (100 nM to 10 µM) of unlabeled protein substrate in 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5, 0.1% CHAPS, 1 mM DTT, 37 °C. Aliquots were removed, quenched by the addition of sample buffer, and applied to Novex Tris-glycine 4-20% gradient denaturing gels. After gel electrophoresis and autoradiography, the concentrations of cleavage products were determined by densitometry. Alternatively, the specific activity of the substrate was kept constant and a stock containing both 35S-labeled IVTT substrate and unlabeled protein substrate was prepared and used identically in reaction mixtures as described above. For both methods, calculation of kinetic parameters was performed by nonlinear least squares fitting of the rate versus concentration data using the commercial program Enzfitter (Biosoft).
Spectrophotometric Assays
Synthetic peptidyl substrates were purchased from Bachem and corrected for purity by HPLC analysis on a Vydac C18 column (4.5 × 250 mm) using a water/acetonitrile gradient in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. Purity was also assessed by exhaustive enzymatic digestion, followed by quantification of the chromophoric leaving group by comparison to a standard curve of either p-nitroaniline or aminomethylcoumarin under identical assay conditions.
Assays were conducted in 96-well microtiter plates as described
previously and contained: 65 µl of assay buffer (10 mM
Tris, 1 mM DTT, 0.1% CHAPS, pH 7.5), 10 µl of enzyme
solution (final concentration 2-40 nM), 5 µl of
Me2SO containing the inhibitor and 20 µl of substrate
(34). Production of p-nitroaniline (pNA) from reaction
mixtures containing Suc-YVAD-pNA was measured by following the
absorbance at 405 nm minus that at 650 nm using a Thermomax visible
plate reader from Molecular Devices. Production of
7-amino-4-methylcoumarin (AMC) from enzyme catalyzed cleavage of
Ac-YVAD-AMC or Ac-DEVD-AMC was measured fluorometrically on a Perkin
Elmer LS50B equipped with microtiter plate capabilities and temperature
control from a circulating water bath. The time course of AMC
production was followed using an excitation wavelength of 360 nm and an
emission wavelength of 480 nm, with slit widths of 5 and 15 nm,
respectively. ICE-catalyzed cleavage of the resonance energy transfer
substrate, 4-(4-dimethylaminophenylazo)benzoic acid-YVADAPV-5-[(2-aminoethyl)amino]naphthalene-1-sulfonic
acid (sodium salt), was monitored fluorometrically on the same
instrument above using an excitation wavelength of 340 nM,
an emission wavelength of 490 nM, with slit widths of 10 and 15 nm. Product was quantified with correction for the inner filter
effect using standard curves from mixtures of
4-(4
-dimethylaminophenylazo)benzoic acid and 5-[(2-aminoethyl)amino]naphthalene-1-sulfonic acid (sodium salt).
Peptidyl inhibitors used in this study were purchased from Bachem or synthesized in-house and had a purity of >95% as quantified by HPLC. Ac-YVAD-AMC or Suc-YVAD-pNA at a concentration of 2-4 times the Km value was used as a substrate for ICE or TX assays. Ac-DEVD-AMC at a concentration of 2-4 times the Km value was used as the substrate when CPP32 (Km = 10 µM) or CMH-1 (Km = 100 µM) were present.
Assays containing reversible inhibitors were conducted as above in duplicate with the inhibitor and enzyme preincubated in the microtiter plate for 15 min at 30 °C. The assay was started by the addition of substrate, and the initial rates were determined from progress curves at early reaction times. Ki values were calculated from rate versus inhibitor data with nonlinear least squares fitting to the tight binding equation of Morrison (35). A commercial program, KineTic, was used for this purpose. Reported values are from at least two replicate determinations, and standard errors are not larger than 20%.
Second order rate constants (k) for irreversible inhibitors of ICE homologs were determined from assays where the reaction buffer and containing inhibitor and substrate were preincubated at 37 °C and the reaction initiated by the addition of enzyme warmed to 37 °C. Progress curves of product versus time were fit using the commercial program Enzfitter (Biosoft) to the Morrison equation for time dependent-binding (36).
![]() |
(Eq. 1) |
Crystallization and Refinement of the ICE/Ac-DEVD-CHO Complex
Crystals of inhibited ICE were grown by vapor diffusion.
Ac-DEVD-CHO inhibited protein (10 mg ml1 in 50 mM citrate, 2.0 mM DTT, pH 6.5) was mixed with
reservoir (15% polyethylene glycol 4000, 200 mM
LiSO4, 100 mM sodium HEPES, 0.5%
-octyl
glucoside, pH 7.0) and allowed to stand over the reservoir solution at
4 °C. A single crystal, mounted directly from the crystallization
drop, was used to collect x-ray data at
7 °C extending to 2.4 Å resolution. The crystal belongs to space group
P43212, with unit cell edges a = b = 64.5 Å, c = 162.6 Å.
The structure of Ac-YVAD-CHO bound to ICE (Brookhaven Protein Databank Entry code: 1ICE) was used as a starting model for refinement of the Ac-DEVD-CHO-inhibited enzyme, but with the atoms of the inhibitor removed. Difference electron density maps calculated after rigid body, positional, and individual thermal factor refinement showed clearly the positions of atoms for the P1 Asp, P2 Val, and P3 Glu residues of the inhibitor, but difference electron density for the P4 Asp was less visible. Atoms of the Ac-DEVD-CHO inhibitor were included, and cycles of model building and additional refinement were carried out to convergence. The final model has an R factor of 18.9% for 10,215 reflections (I > sig(I)) between 8.0 and 2.4 Å resolution, with root-mean-square deviation from ideal bond lengths and angles of 0.012 Å and 2.9°, respectively. XPLOR was used for all coordinate and thermal factor refinement (38).
Cleavage of
pre-IL-1 (45 kDa) by ICE to the two processed forms of 28 and 17 kDa
(mature IL-1
) is easily observed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography of
reaction mixtures using 35S-labeled IVTT substrate. To
obtain rate profiles, substrate concentrations were varied by mixing
unlabeled purified pre-IL-1
with the labeled material generated by
the IVTT system. Quantification of the autoradiographs by densitometry
revealed that production of mature IL-1
under these conditions was
linear with time up to at least 25% conversion (data not shown).
Steady state rates were calculated from the extent of conversion at
early reaction times. Saturation kinetics were observed when the
substrate concentration was increased, and the kinetic parameters of
Km = 4.0 µM and kcat = 1.2 s
1 could be determined by least squares fitting of the
data to the Michaelis-Menten equation (see Fig. 1).
Three synthetic substrates containing a cleavage sequence similar to
the 17-kDa cleavage site are commercially available to measure ICE
activity. Using standard spectrophotometric methods, kinetic parameters
for the ICE catalyzed cleavage of these substrates were determined and
are reported in Table I. The Km and
kcat values for the aminomethylcoumarin
substrate are in good agreement with the values of 11 µM
and 0.89 s1 reported using ICE (purified from THP-1
cells) (28). For the octapeptide substrate, the catalytic constants we
measured are similar to those of 11.4 µM and 0.79 s
1 reported by Pennington and Thornberry (39).
TX, an ICE homolog that shares 50% sequence identity, was also
observed to catalyze cleavage of synthetic substrates containing the
YVAD sequence, with similar efficiency. Turnover numbers reported in
Table I were slightly lower than the corresponding ICE values, and
Km increased by only a factor of 2-3. TX could also cleave pre-IL-1 to the mature form, but only at higher enzyme concentrations (20 nM) and lower (<500 nM)
substrate concentrations. As the substrate concentration increased,
apparent substrate inhibition was observed and the reaction rate
slowed. As a consequence, only the selectivity constant V/K
could be determined from the linear part of the rate versus
concentration profile. The value obtained, 1.2 × 103
M
1 s
1, is 2 orders of magnitude
lower than that measured for ICE and pre-IL-1
.
A second substrate for ICE and its homologs, PARP, was chosen for kinetic investigation based on our earlier observation that ICE and TX as well as the reported CPP32 are able to cleave PARP. In an extension of this earlier study, a truncated version of PARP containing only the DNA binding domain was chosen for kinetic analysis of processing. Reaction mixtures contained various amounts of purified PARP and 35S-labeled IVTT product in addition to enzyme, and were again analyzed by SDS-PAGE and densitometry. In reaction mixtures containing 2 nM CPP32 and low (<300 nM) amounts of PARP, clean conversion to two products of 31 and 12 kDa was observed, consistent with cleavage at the Asp214-Gly215 site. However, when the substrate concentration was increased in an attempt to saturate the enzyme, products indicative of cleavage at additional sites were observed. As before, the selectivity constant for CPP32 was obtained from the linear part of the rate versus concentration profile. This value, 2.3 × 106, was the highest measured for PARP cleavage by any of the ICE homologs reported in Table II.
|
The inhibition constants (Ki) for several competitive inhibitors of ICE and its homologs were measured using steady state kinetic methods (Table III). The ICE tetrapeptide aldehyde (Ac-YVAD-CHO) is a potent inhibitor of ICE and TX and is consistent with the nanomolar value reported earlier for ICE. Ac-YVAD-CHO is a poor inhibitor of either CPP32 or CMH-1. The corresponding tetrapeptide aldehyde based upon the PARP cleavage site is a potent subnanomolar inhibitor of CPP32 and an excellent inhibitor of its near homolog CMH-1. Ac-DEVD-CHO, however, is also a potent inhibitor of ICE and TX (Table III). Removal of the P4 Asp residue to generate the tripeptide Glu-Ala-Asp-CHO significantly decreases affinity for CPP32 and CMH-1, but this tripeptide binds to ICE and TX with a Ki of 300 nM.
|
Second order rate constants (k) for the two irreversible inhibitors shown against ICE in Table III agree with those reported previously (28, 40). Both the tetrapeptide dichlorobenzoate and diazomethyl ketone are also effective inhibitors of TX; the second order rate constants differ by only a factor of 2. No measurable effect can be seen with the diazomethyl ketone against the other two homologs in this study. The Z-Val-Ala-Asp-dichlorobenzoate, however, is an irreversible inactivator against CPP32 and CMH-1; the second order rate constant for inactivation is 2 orders of magnitude lower for these homologs than for ICE or TX.
X-ray Crystal Structure of ICE Inhibited by Ac-DEVD-CHOWe
solved the crystal structure of Ac-DEVD-CHO with ICE to explore the
molecular basis of the surprising potency of Ac-DEVD-CHO for ICE. The
structure of Ac-DEVD-CHO bound to ICE reveals many interactions between
the inhibitor side chains and enzyme active site binding pockets (Fig.
2), which help explain effectiveness of Ac-DEVD-CHO
(Ki = 15 nM) in binding to the ICE
active site.
The inhibitor makes three main chain to main chain hydrogen bonds with
residues from the p10 subunit of ICE in an anti-parallel -sheet
arrangement. This hydrogen bonding pattern was also observed in the
Ac-YVAD-CHO/ICE inhibitor complex (4). Ac-YVAD-CHO is also a potent ICE
inhibitor (Ki = 6 nM), and this
structure is shown for comparison (Fig. 2). The largest differences
between the two structures occur at the P1 and
P2 positions of the inhibitor. The aldehyde oxyanion of
Ac-DEVD-CHO is shifted 1.0 Å from its location in the Ac-YVAD-CHO/ICE
complex, and is positioned to form hydrogen bonds with the side chain
imidazole ring of His237 as well as the backbone amide
nitrogen atoms of Cys285 and Gly238. In this
location, the oxyanion of Ac-DEVD-CHO more closely matches the expected
position of the oxyanion in an enzyme-substrate tetrahedral intermediate than was observed in the crystal structure of Ac-YVAD-CHO bound to ICE (Fig. 2). This is a significant difference between the two
inhibitors, as the oxyanion of Ac-DEVD-CHO can make three hydrogen
bonds with the enzyme while the oxyanion of Ac-YVAD-CHO makes only one
with the side chain of His237. The shift in the position of
the oxyanion in the Ac-DEVD-CHO inhibitor has an effect on the
orientation of the P1 aspartic acid side chain. In the
Ac-YVAD-CHO structure, the P1 aspartic acid interacts most
strongly with the Arg179 side chain. On the basis of
hydrogen bonding distance and geometry, the interactions between the
P1 aspartic acid in the Ac-DEVD-CHO inhibitor and ICE are
more equally divided between Arg179, Arg341,
and Gln285. The valine residue in P2 of
Ac-DEVD-CHO makes van der Waals contacts with Val338 and
Trp340 of ICE. The bulkier valine side chain, as compared
to alanine in the Ac-YVAD-CHO inhibitor, requires a shift in the
backbone of the inhibitor at the P2 and P3
positions, but the main chain to main chain hydrogen bonds are
preserved. The P3 glutamic acid side of Ac-DEVD-CHO forms a
hydrogen bond with the guanidino group of Arg341. This is a
new interaction in comparsion to the Ac-YVAD-CHO complex structure,
which cannot form a hydrogen bond between the P3 valine side chain and ICE. The interactions between the P4
aspartic acid in Ac-DEVD-CHO and ICE are more difficult to analyze. The
electron density for this portion of the inhibitor is not well defined (data not shown), which suggests that there is no single favorable set
of interactions between the P4 aspartic acid of Ac-DEVD-CHO and ICE. In contrast, electron density for the P4 tyrosine
residue in Ac-YVAD-CHO is well defined.
The selectivity of ICE for pre-IL-1 is reflected by the rate
constants for the synthetic substrates listed in Table I. Both the
p-nitroanilide and aminomethylcoumarin substrates are good mimics for the natural cleavage sequence. Furthermore, the
Km values for ICE catalyzed cleavage of the
tetrapeptide substrates and pre-IL-1
are similar, indicating that
most of the binding energy can be attributed to interactions in the
S1-S4 binding pockets. Kinetic selectivity of
the closest ICE homolog, TX in cleaving pre-IL-1
is lower by 2 orders of magnitude. This result is consistent with the generally
accepted hypothesis that ICE and only ICE is responsible for the
processing of interleukin 1
to the mature form. However, we do
observe similar kinetic profiles for ICE and TX when synthetic
substrates and inhibitors are used, arguing that the peptidyl pockets
S1-S4 of both enzymes are comparable. A model
of TX built from the ICE structure indicated that residues forming the
S1-S3 pockets were quite similar, the largest
differences occurring in the S4 pocket (15).
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase has been implicated as a substrate for CPP32-like proteases during apoptosis (14). This protein is of special interest, as PARP is a DNA repair enzyme that is cleaved into two fragments at the onset of apoptosis. The identification of PARP as a potential physiological substrate for CPP32-like proteases provides an appealing link between an apoptotic event and a member of the ced-3 cell death protease family. Of the ICE homologs tested, we found CPP32 to be the most efficient at PARP cleavage. Other homologs including ICE and TX will cleave PARP, but at much higher protein concentrations and much more slowly, consistent with the previous report of Gu et al. (6). The biological relevance of this finding is unclear at the present time, as the role of PARP (and its subsequent cleavage) in apoptosis remains to be proven, although it is cleaved early on during the apoptotic sequence of events (41). Mice deficient in the PARP gene are healthy and fertile and show no overt abnormalities, indicating that this gene does not play an essential role in cellular proliferation, differentiation, or development (42, 43).
Based on these two substrates, tetrapeptide inhibitors have been
devised as reagents to block and thereby implicate the presence of
certain ICE homologs in cellular functions. Ac-YVAD-CHO, based upon the
pre-IL-1 cleavage site, is an effective inhibitor of proteases with
the highest homology to ICE itself, with Ki values
of 6 and 14 nM against ICE and TX respectively. It is not effective against either CPP32 or CMH-1. In a similar fashion, Ac-DEVD-CHO was designed from the PARP cleavage sequence to be a potent
inhibitor of CPP32 (25), This is indeed the case, as the compound
inhibits the target protease with Ki of 0.5 nM and is also effective against the closest relative
CMH-1. Most surprising is the potency of this inhibitor against both ICE and TX, revealing this compound to be one of the broadest caspase-reversible inhibitors described to date. The x-ray crystal structure of Ac-DEVD-CHO complexed to ICE reveals an additional hydrogen bond between the glutamic acid residue of the inhibitor and an
arginine residue in the S3 pocket of ICE. A number of new hydrogen bonds between the oxyanion of Ac-DEVD-CHO and the enzyme are
present which were not observed in the structure of ICE with Ac-YVAD-CHO. These new hydrogen bonds as well as the flexibility afforded by the small spatial requirements of the aldehyde group may help explain the surprising potency of the inhibitor relative to
the poor cleavage efficiency of ICE for the corresponding
substrate, PARP.
The irreversible inhibitors based upon the ICE cleavage sequence afford at least 10-fold selectivity for ICE and TX over the CPP32 class of proteases. The increase in potency for the dichlorophenyloxymethyl ketones over the diazomethylketones is seen for ICE and all homologs in this study and may be due to increased interactions of the aromatic moiety on the prime side of the enzyme for all members of the ICE family. It should be noted that the 10-fold difference in activation rates for these irreversible inhibitors is easily compensated for by either increasing the concentration of the inhibitor or prolonging the reaction time. Thus at conditions of 20 µM or greater and for reaction times greater than 1 h, as are commonly used for whole cell studies of apoptosis, these irreversible inactivators can be expected to show little discrimination among members of the ICE family of proteases. This caveat also applies to recent studies of the activation in situ of pro-CPP32 by other caspases (29-32). Additional caution is urged in using reversible caspase inhibitors as "selective" reagents when a thorough study of the inhibition constants against multiple caspases has not been performed. As the present work indicates, such compounds should not be assumed to be selective, and specific inhibitors of CPP32, CMH-1, or MCH-2 have yet to be reported.
We thank Robert Aldape for providing
pre-IL-1 and PARP cDNAs; Judith Lippke for providing CMH-1 and
CPP32 cDNAs; John Fulghum and Stephen Chambers for assistance in
baculovirus protein expression; Jo-Anne Black for aid in preparation of
the Ac-DEVD-CHO/ICE complex; Jim Kofron and Yu-Ping Cheung Luong for
assistance with enzyme assays; Maureen DeCenzo for providing the
pre-IL-1
antibody; Michael Mullican, Scott Harbeson, and Stuart
Jones (Roussel Uclaf) for the synthesis of ICE inhibitors; and Cameron
Stuver and Stephen Chambers for critical reading of the manuscript.