Cell Type-specific Inhibition of Keratinocyte Collagenase-1 Expression by Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor and Keratinocyte Growth Factor
A COMMON RECEPTOR PATHWAY*

(Received for publication, March 4, 1997, and in revised form, May 8, 1997)

Brian K. Pilcher Dagger , Jennifer Gaither-Ganim Dagger , William C. Parks Dagger and Howard G. Welgus Dagger

From the Dagger  Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, and the  Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Collagenase-1 is invariantly expressed by migrating basal keratinocytes in all forms of human skin wounds, and its expression is induced by contact with native type I collagen. However, net differences in enzyme production between acute and chronic wounds may be modulated by soluble factors present within the tissue environment. Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF, FGF-2) and keratinocyte growth factor (KGF, FGF-9), which are produced during wound healing, inhibited collagenase-1 expression by keratinocytes in a dose-dependent manner. However, KGF was >100-fold more effective than bFGF at inhibiting collagenase-1 expression, suggesting that this differential signaling is transduced via an FGF receptor that binds these ligands with different affinities. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analysis of human keratinocyte mRNA for fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) revealed expression of only FGFR-2 IIIb, the KGF-specific receptor, which also binds bFGF with low affinity, and FGFR-3 IIIb, which does not bind bFGF or KGF. FGFRs that bind bFGF with high affinity were not detected. Our results suggest that bFGF and KGF inhibit collagenase-1 expression through the KGF cell-surface receptor (FGFR-2 IIIb). Because bFGF induces collagenase-1 in most cell types, cell-specific expression of FGFR family members may dictate the regulation of matrix metalloproteinases in a tissue-specific manner.


INTRODUCTION

Wound repair is a highly organized process that requires a series of spatially and temporally regulated events to heal a tissue defect. Among these, effective proteolytic degradation of extracellular matrix (ECM)1 macromolecules by various proteases is necessary to remodel the damaged tissue, promote neovascularization, and facilitate efficient migration of cells during re-epithelialization (1). Yet, in chronic ulcers, the overproduction of matrix-degrading proteases and/or the lack of production of their natural inhibitors probably contributes to the underlying pathogenesis of the non-healing state by interfering with normal repair processes and by perpetuating matrix destruction.

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) constitute a family of zinc-dependent enzymes that collectively have the capacity to degrade virtually all components of the ECM (2). While most members of this family possess overlapping substrate specificities, the metallocollagenases, a subgroup of the MMP gene family, have the unique ability to initiate cleavage of fibrillar collagens I, II, and III at a specific locus in their triple helical domain. At physiologic temperature, cleaved collagen molecules denature into gelatin and become susceptible to further digestion by other proteases. Of the three known human collagenases, collagenase-1 (MMP-1) is the enzyme principally responsible for collagen turnover in most tissues and, in particular, the skin.

Previous studies from our laboratories and others have shown that basal keratinocytes at the leading edge of migration in both normally healing wounds and chronic ulcers invariantly express collagenase-1 (3-5). Signal for collagenase-1 is confined to the basal layer of epidermis, diminishes progressively away from the wound edge, and is absent in intact skin. Furthermore, collagenase-1 expression is rapidly induced in wound edge keratinocytes after injury, persists during the healing phase, and ceases following wound closure (6). In chronic, non-healing wounds expression of this MMP is prominent and excessive, whereas in normally healing wounds its expression is transient and localized precisely to areas of active re-epithelialization (3, 7). We have demonstrated that collagenase-1 expression by basal keratinocytes is induced following contact with native type I collagen,2 and the activity of this enzyme is required for cell migration (9). Thus, expression of matrix-degrading enzymes by keratinocytes during cutaneous wound repair is a normal and programmed response to injury, and altered cell-matrix interactions may play a critical role in regulating this response.

In addition to cell-matrix interactions, soluble mediators present in the ECM during wound repair may influence collagenase-1 expression. Keratinocyte collagenase-1 production is stimulated by several growth factors including transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF-alpha )/epidermal growth factor (10), hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (11), transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-beta 1) (12, 13), and interferon-lambda (14). Furthermore, several of these growth factors (e.g. epidermal growth factor and hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor) can augment ECM-directed collagenase-1 expression by keratinocytes (11, 15). In effect, while cell contact with specific matrices establishes the primary "on and off" signals, soluble mediators may finely control the net output of collagenase-1 by keratinocytes.

Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF, FGF-2) and keratinocyte growth factor (KGF, FGF-9) belong to a family of heparin-binding growth factors that exert a variety of effects on multiple cell types (16). bFGF is widely expressed in vivo, is a potent angiogenic factor, and induces collagenase-1 production by cultured fibroblasts (17, 18), endothelial cells (19, 20), and osteoblasts (21). In addition, bFGF stimulates growth and proliferation of human keratinocytes (22, 23). In contrast, KGF is expressed exclusively by cells of mesenchymal origin, such as fibroblasts (24) and microvascular endothelial cells (25), yet it specifically influences epithelial cells by a paracrine signaling mechanism (24, 26, 27). Both bFGF and KGF are expressed during epidermal wound repair (28, 29), and topical application of bFGF to wounds accelerates healing (30). Likewise, inhibition of KGF signaling in basal keratinocytes of epidermis following injury impairs re-epithelialization, presumably by inhibiting keratinocyte proliferation (31).

In this report, we demonstrate that bFGF and KGF down-regulate collagenase-1 expression by keratinocytes in a cell type-specific manner. Additionally, we show that KGF is >100-fold more potent than bFGF in suppressing collagenase-1 production and that keratinocytes express only two fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs): FGFR-3 IIIb, which does not bind bFGF or KGF, and FGFR-2 IIIb, which binds KGF with high affinity, but poorly to bFGF. Thus, bFGF and KGF inhibition of keratinocyte collagenase-1 expression probably occurs exclusively through the KGF (FGFR-2 IIIb) receptor.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

Recombinant human bFGF, recombinant human KGF, and a polyclonal neutralizing antiserum to bFGF were obtained from R & D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Bovine type I collagen (Vitrogen-100) was purchased from Celltrix Laboratories (Palo Alto, CA).

Isolation and Culture of Human Keratinocytes

Human keratinocytes were harvested from healthy adult skin from reduction mammoplasties or abdominoplasties as described previously (15, 32). Briefly, the subcutaneous fat and deep dermis were removed, and the remaining tissue was incubated in 0.25% trypsin in phosphate-buffered saline. After 16 h, the epidermis was separated from the dermis with forceps, and the keratinocytes were scraped into Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium. The keratinocyte suspension was added to fresh Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum and 0.1% penicillin/streptomycin. A specified amount of keratinocyte suspension was then plated onto tissue culture dishes coated with 1 mg/ml Vitrogen. Under these culture conditions, the keratinocytes proliferate, migrate, differentiate, and cornify similar to cells in vivo. Growth on native type I collagen is necessary for induction of collagenase-1 and keratinocyte adhesion (5, 8, 15).

Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

The amount of collagenase-1 accumulated in keratinocyte-conditioned medium was measured by indirect competitive ELISA (33). This ELISA is completely specific for collagenase-1, has nanogram sensitivity, and detects both active and zymogen enzyme forms, as well as collagenase-1 bound to tissue inhibitor of metalloproteases (TIMP) or bound to substrate. Results were obtained from triplicate determinations and were normalized to total cell protein as quantified by the BCA protein assay (Pierce) using bovine serum albumin as a standard.

Metabolic Labeling

Postconfluent keratinocytes plated on type I collagen were cultured for 24 h in the presence of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/fetal calf serum containing control or experimental solutions. The culture wells were then washed and replaced with methionine-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 5% dialyzed fetal calf serum (to remove free amino acids), 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 2 mM L-glutamine, 0.1 mM each of nonessential amino acids, 50 µCi/ml [35S]methionine (ICN Radiochemicals, Irvine CA), and the identical concentrations of experimental reagents. Conditioned medium was collected after 24 h and stored at -70 °C for analysis by immunoprecipitation.

Immunoprecipitation and Total Protein Synthesis

Specific polyclonal antisera to collagenase-1 (11), stromelysin-1 (34), 92-kDa gelatinase (35), or TIMP-1 (36) were used to immunoprecipitate the 35S-labeled metalloproteinases from keratinocyte-conditioned medium as described (37). Samples were precleared with protein A-Sepharose (Zymed, San Francisco, CA), and supernatants were incubated with antibody for 1 h at 37 °C and then overnight at 4 °C. Immune complexes were precipitated with protein A-Sepharose and washed extensively. Radiolabeled proteins were resolved by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and visualized by fluorography. Total incorporated radioactivity was determined from the same conditioned medium by trichloroacetic acid precipitation.

RNA Isolation and Northern Hybridization

Total RNA was isolated from cultured keratinocytes by phenol-chloroform extraction (38). RNA (5 µg) was denatured and resolved by electrophoresis through a 1% formaldehyde-agarose gel, transferred overnight to Hybond N+ (Amersham Corp.), and hybridized with radiolabeled collagenase-1 (39) and GAPDH cDNA probes. The cDNA probes were labeled by random priming (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany) with [alpha -32P]dCTP (NEN Life Science Products). Following hybridization, the membranes were washed and exposed to x-ray film for an appropriate duration.

Reverse Transcriptase-PCR Analysis

To determine which FGFRs were expressed by both human keratinocytes and fibroblasts, total RNA was harvested as above. RNA was treated with RQ1 RNase-free DNase (Promega, Madison, WI) to remove any contaminating DNA as described (40). DNase-treated RNA (5 µg) was reverse transcribed with random hexamers using kit reagents and under the manufacturer's recommended conditions (GeneAmp RNA PCR kit, Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT). For each sample, a parallel reaction was run without reverse transcriptase as a control.

Expression of FGFRs 1-4 in human keratinocytes was detected by polymerase chain amplification of cDNA using a single primer pair to amplify conserved sequences in the tyrosine kinase domain of all FGFRs (41). The primer sequences used for PCR were DO156 (5'-TCNGAGATGGGAGRTGATGAA-3') and DO158 (5'-CCAAGTCHGCDATCCTTCAT-3'), which produce a 341-bp product. PCR was for 30 cycles at 94 °C for 1 min, 55 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min, followed by a final extension step of 72 °C for 7 min. To determine which members of the FGFR family were expressed, PCR products were analyzed by restriction digestion analysis with PstI, BalI, ScaI, or NarI. Digested fragments were separated by nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and visualized by silver staining.

To determine the expression of FGFR-2 isoforms (IIIb and IIIc) by human keratinocytes and fibroblasts, we amplified random primed cDNA with specific primers as described (42). Briefly, the cDNA was amplified for FGFR-2 IIIb using the 5'S primer corresponding to a region within the FGFR-2 IIIb-specific exon K: 5'-CAATGCAGAAGTGCTGGCTCTGTTCAA-3'. FGFR-2 IIIc was amplified using the 5'S primer corresponding to a region within the FGFR-2 IIIc specific exon B: 5'-GTTAACACCACGGACAA-3'. The 3'AS primer used in both PCR reactions was from nucleotides 2093-2112 of the cDNA coding for FGFR-2 IIIb. The same 3'AS primer was used for amplification of both FGFRs, since the nucleotide sequence is identical for both isoforms in this region (27, 43, 44). PCR was for 40 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 55 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min, followed by a final extension step of 72 °C for 7 min. The predicted fragment size was 822 bp for the FGFR-2 IIIb and 830 for FGFR-2 IIIc. The products were separated through a 2% agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. Further specificity was determined by transfer to Hybond N+ followed by Southern hybridization with a radiolabeled product-specific oligonucleotide probe. The probe was labeled by terminal transferase (Boehringer Mannheim) with [alpha -32P]dCTP. Following hybridization, the membranes were washed and exposed to x-ray film for an appropriate duration.

To determine the expression of FGFR-3 isoforms (IIIb and IIIc) by human keratinocytes and fibroblasts, we amplified random primed cDNA with specific primers as described (45). The 5'S primer used (5'-GCACCGGCCCCATCCTGCAGGCGG-3') corresponds to nucleotides 789-811 of the human FGFR-3 gene, and the 3'AS primer used (5'-TACACACTGCCCGCCTCGTCAGC-3') corresponds to nucleotides 1135-1158 of the FGFR-3 gene, generating a product with a predicted size of 369 bp. PCR was for 30 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 68 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min followed by a final extension step of 72 °C for 7 min. Following amplification, products were analyzed by restriction digestion analysis with HaeII and TaqI, allowing subsequent identification of IIIb and IIIc isoforms. Products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis, transferred to Hybond N+, and hybridized with a radiolabeled product-specific oligonucleotide probe. The probe was labeled by terminal transferase with alpha  [32P]dCTP. Following hybridization, the membranes were washed and exposed to x-ray film for an appropriate duration.


RESULTS

bFGF Inhibits Collagenase-1 Production by Keratinocytes in a Cell Type-specific Manner

Previous reports have documented the capacity of bFGF to stimulate collagenase-1 production in cells of mesenchymal origin (18, 19, 46, 47). Consistent with these studies, we found that bFGF increased collagenase-1 production by human dermal fibroblasts in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1A). At 1.0 ng/ml bFGF, collagenase-1 production was augmented 5-fold over control levels. To assess if bFGF modulates keratinocyte collagenase-1 production, cells were exposed to increasing concentrations of growth factor for 72 h, and collagenase-1 accumulation in the medium was quantified by ELISA. In contrast to other cell types, bFGF potently inhibited keratinocyte collagenase-1 expression, with an ED50 of ~1.0 ng/ml (Fig. 1B). Preincubation with anti-bFGF neutralizing antiserum abolished collagenase-1 down-regulation (Fig. 1C), thus demonstrating that the effect was due to the growth factor itself and not to a contaminant.


Fig. 1. bFGF inhibits keratinocyte collagenase-1 production in a cell type-specific and dose-dependent manner. Human dermal fibroblasts (A) were cultured on tissue culture plastic and keratinocytes (B and C) on type I collagen until confluent. Increasing concentrations of bFGF were added to the cell cultures, and collagenase-1 protein accumulated in the conditioned media after 72 h of incubation was quantified by ELISA. In C, cells were cultured on type I collagen alone (control), or in the presence of bFGF neutralizing antiserum (10 µg/ml). bFGF (25 ng/ml) was preincubated with antibody 2 h prior to addition to cultures. Cell layers were analyzed for total protein content as described under "Experimental Procedures." Data shown are the means of triplicate observations from the same cell preparation.
[View Larger Version of this Image (16K GIF file)]

Metabolic labeling and immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed that bFGF inhibited keratinocyte collagenase-1 production at the level of new enzyme synthesis (Fig. 2A). Immunoprecipitation of the same conditioned media for stromelysin-1 showed similarly reduced expression of this MMP (Fig. 2B), whereas the synthesis of 92-kDa gelatinase and TIMP-1 was unchanged (data not shown). Inhibition of collagenase-1 and stromelysin-1 expression was specific, since synthesis of total secreted proteins by keratinocytes increased slightly following bFGF treatment (Table I). The disparity in bFGF concentrations required to effectively inhibit keratinocyte collagenase-1 production in Figs. 1 and 2 reflect the individual skin donors examined, whom we have found to exhibit variable sensitivities to the growth factor.


Fig. 2. bFGF inhibits biosynthesis of keratinocyte collagenase-1 and stromelysin-1. Human keratinocytes were cultured on type I collagen until confluent. Cellular proteins were metabolically labeled as described under "Experimental Procedures," and conditioned medium was analyzed for the presence of collagenase-1 (A) or stromelysin-1 (B) with specific antisera. Cells were treated with 1.0 or 25 ng/ml of bFGF as indicated. Results from one representative experiment of two different cell preparations analyzed are shown.
[View Larger Version of this Image (52K GIF file)]

Table I. Total protein synthesis

The same labeled cellular proteins used for immunoprecipitation of collagenase-1 (Fig. 2 and 4B) were instead precipitated with 20% trichloroacetic acid as described under "Experimental Procedures." The data presented are the means ± S.D. of triplicate determinations from three separate wells per treatment.

Condition Protein synthesisa

Control 12,258  ± 1068
bFGF (1.0 ng/ml) 13,279  ± 2167
bFGF (25 ng/ml) 16,622  ± 956
KGF (1.0 ng/ml) 16,220  ± 3723
KGF (10 ng/ml) 15,237  ± 676

a Values for protein synthesis are in trichloracetic acid-precipitable counts/min.

bFGF Inhibits Collagenase-1 Production in Keratinocytes Pretranslationally

Total RNA was isolated from keratinocytes that had been treated for 24 h in the absence or presence of bFGF (25 ng/ml) and was analyzed by Northern hybridization. bFGF inhibited steady-state collagenase-1 mRNA levels, causing a 68% reduction when compared with untreated controls (Fig. 3A). Identically treated cells were cultured for 48 h, and collagenase-1 protein was quantified by ELISA (Fig. 3B). bFGF inhibited collagenase-1 protein expression (57%) proportionally to the drop in mRNA levels (68%), indicating pretranslational regulation.


Fig. 3. bFGF inhibits keratinocyte collagenase-1 production pretranslationally. A, keratinocytes were cultured on type I collagen until confluent. Cells were untreated (control) or exposed to bFGF (25 ng/ml) for 24 h. Total RNA was harvested and analyzed by Northern hybridization. The upper panel represents hybridization with a radiolabeled collagenase-1 cDNA probe. The lower panel represents hybridization with a radiolabeled GAPDH cDNA probe, demonstrating loading equivalence of total RNA. B, keratinocytes from the same skin preparation were treated identically, and collagenase-1 content in the conditioned media following 48 h of culture was quantified by ELISA. Each bar represents the mean generated from triplicate determinations.
[View Larger Version of this Image (26K GIF file)]

KGF Inhibits Keratinocyte Collagenase-1 Production

Although bFGF consistently inhibited keratinocyte collagenase-1 expression, we often had to use relatively high concentrations (>= 10 ng/ml) of the growth factor to observe this activity (Fig. 2 and other data not shown). Because multiple FGFs bind to more than one FGFR with different affinities (48-51), we postulated that other members of the FGF family might be more potent inhibitors of collagenase-1 production. KGF, a mesenchymal cell-derived cytokine that acts specifically on epithelial cells (24), was chosen as a candidate because of its relevance to epidermal wound repair. Paralleling the effects of bFGF, treatment of cultured keratinocytes with increasing concentrations of KGF resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of collagenase-1 expression (Fig. 4A). Futhermore, KGF was more potent, consistently demonstrating an ED50 of ~0.01 ng/ml, at least 100-fold lower than bFGF.


Fig. 4. KGF inhibits keratinocyte collagenase-1 production. A, human keratinocytes were cultured on type I collagen until confluent. Increasing concentrations of KGF were added to cell cultures and collagenase-1 content after 72 h of incubation was quantified by ELISA. Each data point represents the mean of triplicate determinations from the same cell preparation. B, human keratinocytes were cultured on type I collagen and treated with 1.0 or 10 ng/ml KGF. Metabolically labeled proteins in the conditioned medium were immunoprecipitated with collagenase-1 antiserum as described. Results from one representative experiment of three different cell preparations analyzed are shown.
[View Larger Version of this Image (35K GIF file)]

As demonstrated by metabolic labeling and immunoprecipitation, KGF inhibited collagenase-1 production (Fig. 4B). Again, KGF was effective at lower concentrations than bFGF (Fig. 4A versus Fig. 1B). As observed for bFGF, stromelysin-1 biosynthesis was also inhibited by KGF treatment, whereas 92-kDa gelatinase and TIMP-1 were unaffected (data not shown). Total protein synthesis was mildly increased by KGF (Table I), indicating the specificity of its collagenase-related activity.

KGF Inhibits Keratinocyte Collagenase-1 Expression Pretranslationally

Northern hybridization was performed to determine if KGF inhibited collagenase-1 production in a manner similar to bFGF. Keratinocytes treated with KGF (1.0 ng/ml) displayed a dramatic reduction in collagenase-1 mRNA compared with untreated cells (Fig. 5A). To compare KGF inhibition of collagenase-1 mRNA with collagenase-1 protein, conditioned media samples from the same skin donor were analyzed by ELISA. Quantitation demonstrated that inhibition of secreted collagenase-1 protein closely paralleled decreased mRNA levels (Fig. 5B; 69 versus 70%, respectively).


Fig. 5. KGF inhibition of keratinocyte collagenase-1 production is pretranslational. A, keratinocytes were cultured on type I collagen until confluent. Cells were untreated (control) or exposed to KGF (1.0 ng/ml) for 24 h, and total RNA was harvested and analyzed by Northern hybridization. The upper panel represents hybridization with a radiolabeled collagenase-1 cDNA probe. The lower panel represents hybridization with a radiolabeled GAPDH cDNA probe, demonstrating loading equivalence of total RNA. B, keratinocytes from the same skin preparation were treated identically, and collagenase-1 content in the conditioned medium following 48 h of culture was quantified by ELISA. Each bar represents the mean generated from triplicate determinations.
[View Larger Version of this Image (25K GIF file)]

Inhibition of Keratinocyte Collagenase-1 Expression by bFGF and KGF Is Transduced through the KGF Receptor

FGFs activate a family of four receptor tyrosine kinases, which bind each member with different affinities (48, 49, 51, 52). Further specialization of these receptors occurs through alternative mRNA splicing, leading to unique ligand binding properties (27, 52, 53). We examined FGFRs present on keratinocytes to determine whether cell surface receptor expression could explain the differences in ED50 between bFGF and KGF required to obtain an equivalent inhibition of collagenase-1 expression by keratinocytes.

We used established reverse transcriptase-PCR methods to determine which members of the FGFR family are expressed by human keratinocytes (41, 42, 45). Total RNA was isolated from keratinocytes of two separate skin donors, and a random-primed cDNA library was generated by reverse transcription. Amplification of the cDNA using a single primer pair to generate all FGFRs yielded the expected 341-bp fragment (Fig. 6A). As seen by differences in band intensities using EtBr staining, levels of FGFR expression varied among the two populations of keratinocytes. To distinguish among keratinocyte FGFRs 1-4, PCR products were analyzed by restriction digestion analysis. Cultured keratinocytes expressed similar levels of FGFRs 2 and 3 but did not express FGFRs 1 and 4 (Fig. 6B). Extraneous bands of sizes different from that predicted were seen following silver staining. These bands probably resulted from low level contamination by genomic DNA. Our assignment of receptor isotypes remains unchanged, however, because nonspliced regions produce fragments larger than those predicted by restriction digestion. The expression of only FGFRs 2 and 3 was a consistent finding among several skin donors (n = 5), but, as previously stated, expression levels varied among samples.


Fig. 6. Expression of FGFR family members (FGFR-1-4) by human keratinocytes. A, cDNA fragments representing all FGFRs were amplified from two individual skin donors using a single primer pair. The resulting product of 341 bp was visualized by EtBr staining. B, PCR products were analyzed by restriction digestion analysis with PstI, BalI, ScaI, and NarI to determine the FGFR profile (types 1-4, respectively) of human keratinocytes. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by silver staining revealed fragments of the predicted size for FGFR-2 (235/106) and FGFR-3 (250/91). No digestion fragments of the predicted size were evident for FGFR-1 (207/134) or FGFR-4 (200/141). Thus, human keratinocytes express FGFRs 2 and 3 but not FGFR 1 or 4.
[View Larger Version of this Image (49K GIF file)]

Alternative splicing of primary transcripts of FGFRs 1-3 generates cell surface receptors having unique sequences within the ligand-binding Ig-like domain III (52-54). These isoforms, designated IIIb and IIIc, have distinct ligand affinities that regulate FGF signaling (51). Because cultured keratinocytes expressed only FGFRs 2 and 3 (Fig. 6), we determined which isoform(s) (IIIb or IIIc) of each receptor were expressed.

Alternative splicing of FGFR-2 produces two distinct isoforms: FGFR-2 IIIb and FGFR-2 IIIc (27, 44). The IIIb isoform binds KGF with high affinity but does not efficiently bind to bFGF. In contrast, FGFR-2 IIIc affinity for bFGF is high, whereas KGF does not bind (51). FGFR-2 IIIb, but not FGFR-2 IIIc, was expressed by primary keratinocytes as demonstrated by EtBr staining (Fig. 7, A and C). In contrast, human foreskin fibroblasts expressed only FGFR-2 IIIc (Fig. 7, A and C). Specificity was verified by Southern hybridization with a product-specific oligonucleotide probe (Fig. 7, B and D). These data agree with our findings that equivalent inhibition of keratinocyte collagenase-1 expression required much higher concentrations of bFGF than KGF and that keratinocytes and fibroblasts exhibited different responses to bFGF.


Fig. 7. Expression of IIIb and IIIc exons of the FGFR-2 in human keratinocytes and fibroblasts. PCR analysis of FGFR-2 IIIb (A and B) and FGFR-2 IIIc (C and D) was used to determine expression by human keratinocytes and foreskin fibroblasts. The resulting products of 822 bp (FGFR-2 IIIb) and 830 bp (FGFR-2 IIIc) were visualized by EtBr staining (A and C) and Southern hybridization with a radiolabeled product-specific oligonucleotide probe (B and D). Human keratinocytes expressed only FGFR-2 IIIb, whereas foreskin fibroblasts expressed only FGFR-2 IIIc.
[View Larger Version of this Image (44K GIF file)]

Similar to FGFR-2, alternative splicing of FGFR-3 primary transcripts results in two distinct isoforms, FGFR-3 IIIb and FGFR-3 IIIc (53, 55, 56). FGFR-3 IIIb does not bind bFGF or KGF, whereas FGFR-3 IIIc binds bFGF with high affinity but does not bind to KGF (51). Keratinocytes expressed only FGFR-3 IIIb, as determined by restriction digestion analysis and EtBr staining of PCR products (Fig. 8A). Specificity was verified by Southern hybridization with a product-specific oligonucleotide probe (Fig. 8B).


Fig. 8. Expression of IIIb and IIIc exons of the FGFR-3 in human keratinocytes. A and B, cDNA fragments of FGFR-3 IIIb and IIIc were amplified from human keratinocytes. The resulting product of 369 bp was visualized by EtBr staining (uncut). PCR products were analyzed by restriction digestion analysis with TaqI or HaeII to determine which isoforms were expressed (IIIb or IIIc, respectively). EtBr staining (A) and Southern hybridization with a radiolabeled oligonucleotide probe (B) revealed a fragment of the predicted size for FGFR-3 IIIb (264 bp) following digestion with TaqI. No digestion fragments were evident for FGFR-3 IIIc following digestion with HaeII. Thus, human keratinocytes express only the IIIb isoform of FGFR-3.
[View Larger Version of this Image (37K GIF file)]


DISCUSSION

The precise regulation of MMP expression is critical for normal wound repair and for maintaining tissue homeostasis. Aberrant expression following tissue injury may lead to a failure of healing. Indeed, we have demonstrated increased expression of collagenase-1 and stromelysin-1 in certain ulcerative skin lesions when compared with normally healing wounds (34, 57, 58). Furthermore, inflammatory/proliferative diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (59), are associated with unregulated production of MMPs, leading to widespread matrix destruction. Therefore, precise control of MMP expression in multiple cell types is necessary to maintain proper tissue organization and to promote events essential to postinjury repair.

Previous reports from our laboratories and others have shown that expression of collagenase-1 during cutaneous wound repair is restricted to basal keratinocytes at the leading edge of re-epithelialization (3, 4, 57, 60). These cells are in contact with dermal ECM (5, 7), and collagenase-1 production by keratinocytes in vitro is primarily induced by contact with native type I collagen (7, 8), facilitating cell migration on this matrix (9). Three human interstitial collagenases have been reported to date. In a variety of normal and disease-associated tissue remodeling events, collagenase-1 may be expressed by epithelial cells, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, chondrocytes, and macrophages (3, 4, 57, 61, 62). In contrast, expression of collagenase-2 (MMP-8) is limited to neutrophils and chondrocytes (63, 64), and collagenase-3 (MMP-13), originally cloned from a breast carcinoma cell line (65), is expressed in articular cartilage (66, 67) and developing bone (68). Recent studies by Johansson et al. (69) have reported expression of collagenase-3 by HaCaT keratinocytes following treatment with TGF-alpha and TGF-beta . In contrast, however, primary human epidermal keratinocytes fail to express both collagenase-2 and -3, and our results confirm these observations (data not shown), thereby suggesting that collagenase-1 is the principal collagen-degrading enzyme produced by keratinocytes during repair.

In addition to cell-matrix interactions, soluble factors present within the extracellular environment may also play an important role in regulating the expression of MMPs by keratinocytes (10, 11, 13, 14, 70). Indeed, in this report we demonstrate that members of the FGF family inhibit the production of collagenase-1 by keratinocytes. Perhaps more interesting, however, are the findings that inhibition by these growth factors is cell type-specific and that ligand signaling most likely occurs through the KGF binding isoform (IIIb) of FGFR-2.

The molecular mechanisms responsible for cell type-specific regulation of MMP expression may be numerous and distinct. For example, intranuclear events mediate TGF-beta 1 inhibition of collagenase-1 production in fibroblasts and its induction in keratinocytes (13). Mauviel et al. (13) demonstrated that distinct jun trans-activating factors result in the differential regulation of collagenase-1 transcription in these two cell types. Although not reported to date, other cell-specific post-receptor signal transduction pathways could also mediate the different responses of cell types to a soluble factor. Furthermore, responses of distinct cell types to extracellular cation concentrations also regulate MMP production. Indeed, increased intracellular Ca2+ induces collagenase-1 in fibroblasts (71), whereas its secretion is inhibited in keratinocytes (72). Finally, the binding of a single cytokine or growth factor to distinct cell-surface receptors provides yet another potential pathway for cell-specific MMP regulation. Many studies had previously shown bFGF to induce the expression of MMPs in various cell types, including fibroblasts, smooth muscle cells, osteoblasts, and endothelial cells (17-21). Indeed, bFGF has been regarded as a prototypic MMP-inducing agent. Our findings represent the first report demonstrating the inhibition of MMP expression by any member of the FGF family and also the first report of cell-specific responses in MMP expression mediated by a single ligand's binding to different receptors on two distinct cell types.

Members of the FGF family have the capacity to activate up to four receptor tyrosine kinases (48, 49, 52). In addition, FGFRs 1-3 undergo alternative mRNA splicing, generating IIIb and IIIc isoforms (27, 52, 53). Thus, regulation of cell signaling results from different ligand binding affinities of each receptor variant (51). Because KGF is produced in high quantities by dermal fibroblasts underlying the edges of the wound bed (29), we examined its capacity to regulate collagenase-1 expression by keratinocytes in vitro. We found that KGF inhibited keratinocyte collagenase-1 production and that it was effective at >100-fold lower concentrations than bFGF. We next observed that human keratinocytes in vitro expressed only FGFR isoforms that bind KGF with high affinity (FGFR-2 IIIb) and bind bFGF very weakly (FGFR-2 IIIb and FGFR-3 IIIb). Of the isoforms that bind weakly to bFGF, FGFR-2 IIIb does so with slightly higher affinity than FGFR-3 IIIb (51). We therefore propose that in keratinocytes, bFGF and KGF signal through FGFR-2 IIIb (the KGF receptor), accounting for the requirement of increased concentrations of bFGF when compared with KGF to obtain an equivalent level of collagenase-1 inhibition. Furthermore, human fibroblasts expressed FGFR-2 IIIc, which displays high binding affinity for bFGF but fails to complex KGF, and presumably mediates collagenase-1 up-regulation in these cells.

Expression of different FGFR isoforms in distinct compartments of the skin may contribute to spatially localized expression of MMPs. Regulation of FGFR isoforms is cell type-specific, with exon b expression limited to epithelial cells and exon c expression limited to cells of mesenchymal origin (56, 73, 74). Thus, expression of c isoforms by dermal fibroblasts and endothelial cells following tissue injury permits responsiveness to FGFs within the ECM and would promote collagenase-1 production, which is essential to ECM remodeling and angiogenesis. In contrast, production of b isoforms in keratinocytes behind the migrating front of epithelium would inhibit collagenase-1 expression and allow cell proliferation and differentiation.

Recent studies have begun to delineate a role for KGF production during wound repair. Following tissue injury, the expression of KGF is markedly up-regulated by fibroblasts within the damaged dermis and acts in a paracrine manner to stimulate the overlying epithelium (29, 75). Additionally, KGF applied to full-thickness wounds results in increased re-epithelialization associated with epidermal thickening (76), and the targeted overexpression of this growth factor to keratinocytes leads to marked acanthosis (8). In contrast, expression of a dominant negative FGFR-2 IIIb driven by the K-14 promoter in transgenic mice resulted in epidermal atrophy, abnormal hair follicles, and impaired re-epithelialization (31). Taken together, these data suggest that the primary influence of KGF following injury is to promote proliferation and differentiation of basal keratinocytes.

Our data suggest that KGF may restrict keratinocyte MMP expression after wounding, thereby preventing the excessive degradation of the ECM. Interestingly, KGF receptors are expressed throughout the full thickness of intact skin. Upon wounding, receptor expression is dramatically decreased in migrating keratinocytes, and this pattern persists throughout the healing phase. However, KGF receptors are still prominently expressed by proliferating basal cells just behind the migrating front and in noninvolved areas of epidermis (75). When injury results in the production of KGF by underlying dermal fibroblasts, keratinocytes at the edge of tissue damage augment their basal proliferating phenotype, supplying new cells for the migrating front. Inhibition of MMP expression by KGF in these proliferating wound edge keratinocytes may be needed to prevent the degradation of reforming basement membrane or the aberrant destruction of underlying ECM. Because migrating wound keratinocytes have markedly down-regulated KGF receptor (i.e. FGFR-2 IIIb) expression, KGF would not affect these cells, allowing collagenase-1 production to facilitate migration. Thus, KGF may play a dual role in wound repair, as a factor that stimulates cell proliferation and differentiation at the wound edge but also restricts MMP production to just the actively migrating cells.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant AR35805.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
   Recipient of NIH Individual National Research Service Award AR08339. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Division of Dermatology, Barnes-Jewish Hospital North, Washington University School of Medicine, 216 South Kingshighway, Yalem 502, St. Louis, Missouri 63110. Tel.: 314-454-8290; Fax: 314-454-8293; E-mail: dermlab2{at}imgate.wustl.edu.
1   The abbreviations used are: ECM, extracellular matrix; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; bFGF, basic FGF; MMP, matrix metalloproteinases; TGF, transforming growth factor; KGF, keratinocyte growth factor; FGFR, FGF receptor; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; bp, base pair(s).
2   B. D. Sudbeck, B. K. Pilcher, H. G. Welgus, and W. C. Parks, (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, in press.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. David M. Ornitz and Donald G. McEwen (Washington University, St. Louis, MO), for technical help with reverse transcriptase-PCR assays and critical evaluation of the manuscript; Dr. Alice Pentland (Washington University), for help with obtaining skin for keratinocyte culture; and Dr. Gregory Goldberg (Washington University) for the collagenase-1 cDNA.


REFERENCES

  1. Mignatti, P., Rifkin, D. B., Welgus, H. G., and Parks, W. C. (1996) in The Molecular and Cellular Biology of Wound Repair (Clark, R. A. F., ed), 2nd Ed., pp. 427-474, Plenum Press, New York
  2. Birkedal-Hansen, H., Moore, W. G. I., Bodden, M. K., Windsor, L. J., Birkedal-Hansen, B., DeCarlo, A., and Engler, J. A. (1993) Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 4, 197-250 [Abstract]
  3. Saarialho-Kere, U. K., Chang, E. S., Welgus, H. G., and Parks, W. C. (1992) J. Clin. Invest. 90, 1952-1957 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Stricklin, G. P., Li, L., Jancic, V., Wenczak, B. A., and Nanney, L. B. (1993) Am. J. Pathol. 143, 1657-1666 [Abstract]
  5. Saarialho-Kere, U. K., Vaalamo, M., Airola, K., Niemi, K.-M., Oikarinen, A. I., and Parks, W. C. (1995) J. Invest. Dermatol. 104, 982-988 [Abstract]
  6. Inoue, M., Kratz, G., Haegerstrand, A., and Ståhle-Bäckdahl, M. (1995) J. Invest. Dermatol. 104, 479-483 [Abstract]
  7. Saarialho-Kere, U. K., Kovacs, S. O., Pentland, A. P., Olerud, J., Welgus, H. G., and Parks, W. C. (1993) J. Clin. Invest. 92, 2858-2866 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Guo, L., Yu, Q. O., and Fuchs, E. (1993) Eur. Mol. Biol. Organ. 12, 973-986
  9. Pilcher, B. K., Sudbeck, B. D., Dumin, J., Krane, S. M., Welgus, H. G., and Parks, W. C. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 137, 1-13 [Free Full Text]
  10. Lyons, J. G., Birkedal-Hansen, B., Pierson, M. C., Whitelock, J. M., and Birkedal-Hansen, H. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 19143-19151 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Dunsmore, S. E., Rubin, J. S., Kovacs, S. O., Chedid, M., Parks, W. C., and Welgus, H. G. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 24576-24582 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Garlick, J. A., Parks, W. C., Welgus, H. G., and Taichman, L. B. (1996) J. Dent. Res. 75, 912-918 [Abstract]
  13. Mauviel, A., Chung, K.-Y., Agarwal, A., Tamai, K., and Uitto, J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 10917-10923 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Tamai, K., Ishikawa, H., Mauviel, A., and Uitto, J. (1995) J. Invest. Dermatol. 104, 384-390 [Abstract]
  15. Sudbeck, B. D., Parks, W. C., Welgus, H. G., and Pentland, A. P. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 30022-30029 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Basilico, C., and Moscatelli, D. (1992) Adv. Cancer Res. 59, 115-165 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Chua, C. C., Chua, B. H., Zhao, Z. Y., Krebs, C., Diglio, C., and Perrin, E. (1991) Connect. Tissue Res. 26, 271-281 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Sasaki, T. (1992) J. Dermatol. 19, 664-666 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Okamura, K., Sato, Y., Matsuda, T., Hamanaka, R., Ono, M., Kohno, K., and Kuwano, M. (1991) J Biol. Chem. 266, 19162-19165 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Cornelius, L. A., Nehring, L. C., Roby, J. D., Parks, W. C., and Welgus, H. G. (1995) J. Invest. Dermatol. 105, 170-176 [Abstract]
  21. Hurley, M. M., Marcello, K., Abreu, C., Brinkerhoff, C. E., Bowik, C. C., and Hibbs, M. S. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 214, 331-339 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. O'Keefe, E. J., Chin, M. L., and Payne, R. E. J. (1988) J. Invest. Dermatol. 90, 767-769 [Abstract]
  23. Shipley, G. D., Keeble, W. W., Hendrickson, J. E., Coffey, R. J. J., and Pittelkow, M. R. (1989) J. Cell. Physiol. 138, 511-518 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Rubin, J. S., Osada, H.-J., Finch, P. W., Taylor, W. G., Rudikoff, S., and Aaronson, S. A. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 802-806 [Abstract]
  25. Smola, H., Thiekotter, G., and Fusenig, N. E. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 122, 417-429 [Abstract]
  26. Finch, P. W., Rubin, J. S., Miki, T., Ron, D., and Aaronson, S. A. (1989) Science 245, 752-755 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Miki, T., Bottaro, D. P., Fleming, T. P., Smith, C. L., Burgess, W. H., Chan, A. M., and Aaronson, S. A. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 246-250 [Abstract]
  28. Kurita, Y., Tsuboi, R., Ueki, R., Rifkin, D. B., and Ogawa, H. (1991) Arch. Dermatol. Res. 284, 193-197
  29. Werner, S., Peters, K. G., Longaker, M. T., Fuller-Pace, F., Banda, M., and Williams, L. T. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 6896-6900 [Abstract]
  30. Tsuboi, R., and Rifkin, D. B. (1990) J. Exp. Med. 172, 245-251 [Abstract]
  31. Werner, S., Smola, H., Liao, X., Longaker, M. T., Krieg, T., Hofschneider, P. H., and Williams, L. T. (1994) Science 266, 819-822 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Pentland, A. P., and Needleman, P. (1986) J. Clin. Invest. 77, 246-251 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Cooper, T. W., Bauer, E. A., and Eisen, A. Z. (1982) Collagen Relat. Res. 3, 205-211
  34. Saarialho-Kere, U. K., Kovacs, S. O., Pentland, A. P., Parks, W. C., and Welgus, H. G. (1994) J. Clin. Invest. 94, 79-88 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Shapiro, S. D., Fliszar, C., Broekelman, T., Mecham, R. P., Senior, R. M., and Welgus, H. G. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 6351-6356 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Lacraz, S., Nicod, L., Welgus, H. G., and Dayer, J.-M. (1995) J. Clin. Invest. 96, 2304-2310 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Welgus, H. G., Campbell, E. J., Bar-Shavit, Z., Senior, R. M., and Teitelbaum, S. L. (1985) J. Clin. Invest. 76, 219-224 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Chomczynski, P., and Sacchi, N. (1987) Anal. Biochem. 162, 156-159 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Goldberg, G. I., Wilhelm, S. M., Kronberger, A., Bauer, E. A., Grant, G. A., and Eisen, A. Z. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 6600-6605 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Swee, M. H., Parks, W. C., and Pierce, R. A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 14899-14906 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. McEwen, D. G., and Ornitz, D. M. (1997) Biotechniques 22, 1068-1070 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Pekonen, F., Nyman, T., and Rutanen, E.-M. (1993) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 95, 43-49 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Miki, T., Fleming, T. P., Bottaro, D. P., and Rubin, J. S. (1991) Science 251, 72-75 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Yayon, A., Zimmer, Y., Shen, G. H., Avivi, A., Yarden, Y., and Givol, D. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 1885-1890 [Abstract]
  45. Scotet, E., and Houssaint, E. (1995) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1264, 238-242 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Kennedy, S. H., Qin, H., Lin, L., and Tan, E. M. (1995) Am. J. Pathol. 146, 764-771 [Abstract]
  47. Varghese, S., Ramsby, M. L., Jeffrey, J. J., and Canalis, E. (1995) Endocrinology 135, 2156-2162
  48. Partanen, J., Makela, T. P., Eerola, E., Korhonen, J., Hirvonen, H., Claesson-Welsh, L., and Alitalo, K. (1991) EMBO J. 10, 1347-1354 [Abstract]
  49. Ornitz, D. M., and Leder, P. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 16305-16311 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Mansukhani, A., Dell'Era, P., Moscatelli, D., Kornbluth, S., Hanafusa, H., and Basilico, C. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 3305-3309 [Abstract]
  51. Ornitz, D. M., Xu, J., Colvin, J. S., McEwen, D. G., MacArthur, C. A., Coulier, F., Gao, G., and Goldfarb, M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 15292-15297 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Werner, S., Duan, D. S., de Vries, C., Peters, K. G., Johnson, D. E., and Williams, L. T. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 82-88 [Abstract]
  53. Chellaiah, A. T., McEwen, D. G., Werner, S., Xu, J., and Ornitz, D. M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 11620-11627 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Johnson, D. E., Lu, J. C. H., Werner, S., and Williams, L. T. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 4627-4634 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  55. Werner, S., Weinberg, W., Liao, X., Peters, K. G., Blessing, M., Yupsa, S. H., Weiner, R. L., and Williams, L. T. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 2635-2643 [Abstract]
  56. Avivi, A., Yayon, A., and Givol, D. (1993) FEBS Lett. 330, 249-252 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  57. Saarialho-Kere, U. K., Chang, E. S., Welgus, H. G., and Parks, W. C. (1993) J. Invest. Dermatol. 100, 335-342 [Abstract]
  58. Saarialho-Kere, U. K., Welgus, H. G., and Parks, W. C. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 17354-17361 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Firestein, G. S. (1992) Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 4, 348-354 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  60. Vaalamo, M., Weckroth, M., Poulakkainen, P., Kere, J., Saarinen, P., Lauharanta, J., and Saarialho-Kere, U. K. (1995) Br. J. Dermatol. 135, 52-59
  61. Fisher, C., Gilbertson-Beadling, S., Powers, E. A., Petzold, G., Poorman, R., and Mitchell, M. A. (1994) Dev. Biol. 162, 499-510 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  62. Galis, Z. S., Sukhova, G. K., Lark, M. W., and Libby, P. (1994) J. Clin. Invest. 94, 2493-2503 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  63. Hasty, K. A., Pourmotabbed, T. F., Goldberg, G. I., Thompson, J. P., Spinella, D. G., Stevens, R. M., and Mainardi, C. L. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 11421-11424 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Chubinskaya, S., Huch, K., Mikecz, K., Cs-Szabo, G., Hasty, K., Kuettner, K., and Cole, A. (1996) Lab. Invest. 74, 232-240 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  65. Freije, J. M. P., Díez-Itza, I., Balbín, M., Sánchez, L. M., Blasco, R., Tolivia, J., and López-Otín, C. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 16766-16773 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Mitchell, P. G., Magna, H. A., Reeves, L. M., Lopresti-Morrow, L. L., Yocum, S. A., Rosner, P. J., Geoghegan, K. F., and Hambor, J. E. (1996) J. Clin. Invest. 97, 761-768 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  67. Reboul, P., Pelletier, J., Tardif, G., Cloutier, J., and Martel-Pelletier, J. (1996) J. Clin. Invest. 97, 2011-2019 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Gack, S., Vallon, R., Schmidt, J., Grigoriadis, A., Tuckermann, J., Schenkel, J., Weiher, H., Wagner, E., and Angel, P. (1995) Cell Growth & Differ. 6, 759-767 [Abstract]
  69. Johansson, N., Westermarck, J., Leppa, S., Hakkinen, L., Koivisto, L., Lopez-Otín, C., Peltonen, J., Heino, J., and Kahari, V.-M. (1997) Cell Growth & Differ. 8, 243-250 [Abstract]
  70. Garlick, J. A., Harrington, R., and Taichman, L. B. (1993) J. Invest. Dermatol., in press
  71. Lambert, C. A., Lefebvre, P. Y., Nusgens, B. V., and Lapiere, C. M. (1993) Biochem. J. 290, 135-138 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  72. Sudbeck, B. D., Pilcher, B. K., Pentland, A. P., and Parks, W. C. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 811-824
  73. Yan, G., Fukabori, Y., McBride, G., Nikolaropolous, S., and McKeehan, W. L. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 4513-4522 [Abstract]
  74. Gilbert, E., Del Gatto, F., Champion-Arnaud, P., Gesnel, M. C., and Breathnach, R. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 5461-5468 [Abstract]
  75. Marchese, C., Chedid, M., Dirsch, O. R., Csaky, K. G., Torrisi, M. R., Santanelli, F., Latini, C., LaRochelle, W. J., and Aaronson, S. A. (1995) J. Exp. Med. 182, 1369-1376 [Abstract]
  76. Staiano-Coico, L., Kruger, J. G., Rubin, J. S., D'Limi, S., Vallar, V. P., Valentino, L., Fahei, T., III, Hawes, A., Kingston, G., Maidden, M. R., Mathwich, M., Gottleib, A. B., and Aaronson, S. A. (1993) J. Exp. Med. 178, 865-876 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.