Direct Evidence That Involucrin Is a Major Early Isopeptide Cross-linked Component of the Keratinocyte Cornified Cell Envelope*

(Received for publication, June 28, 1996, and in revised form, August 27, 1996)

Peter M. Steinert Dagger and Lyuben N. Marekov

From the Laboratory of Skin Biology, NIAMS, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-2752

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
Note Added in Proof
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Involucrin was the first protein to be identified as a likely constituent of the insoluble cornified cell envelope (CE) of stratified squamous epithelia. However, to date, direct isolation from CEs of involucrin cross-linked by way of the transglutaminase-induced isopeptide bond has not been reported. We have treated human foreskin CEs with methanol/KOH (saponification) to hydrolyze off much of the lipids. By immunogold electron microscopy, this exposed large amounts of involucrin epitopes as well as of desmoplakin, a desmosomal structural protein. About 20% of the total CE protein could be solubilized by proteolytic digestion after saponification, of which involucrin was the most abundant. Subsequent amino acid sequencing revealed many peptides involving involucrin cross-linked either to itself or to a variety of other known CE protein components, including cystatin alpha , desmoplakin, elafin, keratins, members of the small proline-rich superfamily, loricrin, and unknown proteins related to the desmoplakin family. Specific glutamines or lysines of involucrin were used to cross-link the different proteins, such as glutamines 495 and 496 to desmoplakin, glutamine 288 to keratins, and lysines 468, 485, and 508 and glutamines 465 and 489 for interchain involucrin cross-links. Many identical peptides were obtained from immature CEs isolated from the inner living cell layers of foreskin epidermis. The multiple cross-linked partners of involucrin provide experimental confirmation that involucrin is an important early scaffold protein in the CE. Further, these data suggest that there is significant redundancy in the structural organization of the CE.


INTRODUCTION

The cornified cell envelope (CE)1 is a specialized structure formed during terminal differentiation of stratified squamous epithelia and serves as a vital barrier for the tissue. Foreskin epidermal CEs, for example, consist of an ~15-nm-thick layer of insoluble protein (about 90% of CE mass) on the intracellular or cytoplasmic surface, overlaid by ~5 nm of lipid envelope (10% of mass) located on the extracellular or outer surface (1-6). A similar CE structure of about 5 nm is formed in hair cuticle cells (7, 8). Most other internal "wet" epithelia commonly assemble a 5-10-nm protein but not a lipid component of a CE (3).

The insolubility of the protein portion of the CE is due to extensive cross-linking of several constituent proteins by both disulfide bonds and the Nepsilon -(gamma -glutamyl)lysine isopeptide cross-link introduced by the action of transglutaminases (1-5). Analysis of the protein composition of the CE has been hampered by the simple fact that the cross-link cannot be cleaved by reagents that do not also cleave peptide bonds. Nevertheless, many studies using biochemical and immunological techniques have identified several protein components of CEs of epidermal or other epithelia, including cystatin alpha  (9, 10), formerly named keratolinin (11), elafin (12-15), involucrin (4, 16-21, 23, 24), loricrin (25-30), members of the small proline-rich superfamily (Spr) (Spr1 and Spr2 in epidermis, and Spr3 in cultured keratinocytes) (9, 31-36), filaggrin (37, 38), keratin intermediate filaments (39-42), and possibly trichohyalin (41). Indeed, recent amino acid sequencing of peptides has demonstrated for the first time that the proteins elafin, filaggrin, keratin intermediate filaments, loricrin, and Sprs are in fact isopeptide cross-linked components of human foreskin epidermal CEs (26, 42).

However, detailed information on the relative abundances, temporal orders of deposition, or the assembly mechanisms of these proteins onto the CE structure is incomplete. Nevertheless, two points are becoming more clear. First, the CEs of different epithelia are not the same. For example, loricrin seems to be unique to the CE of "dry" or orthokeratinizing epithelia such as the epidermis (as well as the forestomach of rodents) (25-29). Spr amounts in CEs vary widely in epithelia, from very abundant in the periderm layer of the fetus (36) to absent in CEs of the relatively thin interfollicular postnatal epidermis (35, 36), yet very abundant in the thickened epidermis of the lip, footpad, and foreskin, and other epithelia such as vagina, penis, and hair follicle cells, which are subject to considerable mechanical stresses (35). Therefore the composition of the constituent proteins and thus the structure of the CE seems to vary in parallel with the function of different epithelia (36, 42, 43). Second, a variety of data in toto suggest that involucrin may be a ubiquitous component of the CEs of most if not all epithelial tissues (reviewed in Refs. 3, 4, and 21). One hypothesis suggests that it may serve as an early or scaffold component of CE structures (3, 4, 20, 21, 44) onto which other proteins such as Sprs (36), loricrin (3, 28, 38, 42, 44), or sulfur-rich proteins (8, 45, 46) are later added to effect final stabilization. Interestingly, involucrin also has been shown to be a component of the primitive CE entity formed in liver apoptotic bodies (47).

We have utilized CEs isolated from human foreskin epidermis as a model system to study these structural and functional issues. Our recent work using limited proteolysis and sequencing of the released peptides has provided information on not only which proteins are cross-linked, but also which glutamines and lysines are used for cross-linking by the transglutaminases in vivo (42). The strategy was successful because, as suggested by immunogold decoration studies (44), the enzyme proteinase K could penetrate the cytoplasmic face but not the lipid face of this CE. We showed that the outer one-third of this CE structure consists almost entirely (>90%) of loricrin (i.e. intra- and interchain cross-linked loricrin molecules) and was admixed with smaller amounts of Spr1 and Spr2 which seem to function as cross-bridging molecules among the loricrin. A middle third of the CE structure was also ~85% loricrin, admixed with Sprs, and the elastase inhibitor elafin. Trace amounts of keratins and filaggrin were also cross-linked. However, a similar analysis of the innermost protein portion of this CE, which was enriched in involucrin and which is perhaps common to the CEs of many other types of stratified squamous epithelia, was not possible. Thus, no data exist yet as to how involucrin is cross-linked with other proteins and to the loricrin-rich phase in the epidermal CE or in any other CE structure.

In this study, we have developed methods to circumvent these technical problems. We have characterized peptides from two sources: (i) mature stratum corneum CEs from which much of the covalently attached lipids have been removed by alkaline hydrolysis (saponification) and (ii) less mature CEs from the inner living cell layers of the epidermis. Our new data identify the many proteins to which involucrin is cross-linked in vivo and confirm that it is indeed a major early cross-linked component of the CE.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preparation of CEs

The epidermis of human foreskins was extracted in a buffer of 8 M urea, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 1 mM EDTA. In the absence of a reducing reagent, only the inner living cell layers are dissociated (48, 49). This extract was then filtered through nylon gauze (mesh, 0.1 mm). The retentate of stratum corneum sheets and a filtrate of living cell material were separately pelleted, washed in phosphate-buffered saline, and then used to prepare mature and immature CEs, respectively, by exhaustive boiling in SDS buffer (38, 42, 44). The resultant CE fragments were pelleted through 20% Ficoll in phosphate-buffered saline to remove most adherent (i.e. not cross-linked) solubilized keratins (38, 44). Mature CEs were extracted in 1 M KOH, 95% methanol at 45° for 1 h (saponification). This reaction hydrolyzes the ester linkages by which the ceramide-rich lipid envelope is attached to the protein envelope (6, 50, 51).

Protein Chemistry Procedures

Amino acid analysis of hydrolyzed samples (5.7 N HCl at 110° for 22 h in vacuo) was used routinely to measure protein amounts. The isodipeptide cross-link was measured by amino acid analyses of complete enzymatic digestions of CE samples (26, 42). To generate peptides suitable for microsequencing, aliquots of CEs (1-3 mg of CE protein) before or after saponification were resuspended in 0.1 M N-ethylmorpholine acetate, pH 8.3. They were digested at 37 °C with either trypsin (Sigma; sequencing grade, 1% by weight) for 1-6 h or with proteinase K (Life Technologies, Inc.; 3% by weight) for up to 36 h (42, 44). The solubilized peptide material was collected by pelleting the CE remnants at 14,000 × g and dried.

Peptides were fractionated by HPLC and characterized as described before (42). Initial experiments showed empirically that cross-linked peptides were 20-50 residues long and eluted >50 min from the HPLC column, whereas peptides derived from non-cross-linked portions of constituent CE proteins generally were <= 15 residues long and eluted <40 min. In the case of peptides from saponified CEs, since the initial tryptic peptides were >50 residues long and poorly resolved, they were subjected to a second digestion with proteinase K (0.5% by weight for 30 min) before fractionation. Selected peptides were sequenced as before (42).

Immunogold Electron Microscopy

Several affinity-purified antibodies were used to decorate isolated CE fragments: (i) a polyclonal antibody generated in rabbits using as immunogen a synthetic peptide of the sequence PVCSPGGIQEVTINQSLLQPLNVEIDPEIQKVKSRE corresponding to the H1 region of the human keratin 1 chain (52, 53) (Western blotting methods on epidermal extracts demonstrated specificity for the epidermal type II keratins 1, 2e, and 5 (and 6 in cultured cells) (data not shown)); (ii) a rabbit polyclonal anti-human keratin 10 antibody (53); (iii) a goat polyclonal anti-human loricrin SAF-3 antibody (26); (iv) a mouse monoclonal anti-human involucrin antibody (Biomedical Technologies Inc., Stoughton, MA); (v) a rabbit polyclonal anti-human desmoplakin antibody (gift of Dr. R. D. Goldman); (vi) a polyclonal rabbit anti-rat plectin antibody (Sigma); (vii) a mouse monoclonal anti-human integrin alpha 3 (ATCC, Rockville, MD); and (viii) a rabbit anti-human BPAG1 antibody (gift of Dr. J.C.R. Jones). Pellets of CEs were subjected to pre-embedding, labeled as described (25, 44, 54) and using protein A-gold with a diameter of either 5 or 10 nm.


RESULTS

Our earlier attempt to resolve the structure of the foreskin epidermal stratum corneum ("mature") CE by controlled proteolysis was complicated by the presence on one side of the lipid envelope, which precluded direct access by proteases to the inner layers, and by the dense layer of cross-linked loricrin on the cytoplasmic side (42). Therefore, in this study, we have utilized mature CEs in which the ceramide-rich lipid envelope layer has been removed by alkaline hydrolysis (saponification) or CEs that contain much less loricrin and that have not yet assembled the lipid envelope (from "immature" epidermal cells).

Saponification of Mature CEs Reveals Buried Epitopes for Involucrin and Desmoplakin

We probed mature foreskin epidermal CEs for the presence of epitopes of several proteins that are known to be present, including involucrin and loricrin (42, 44) (Fig. 1, B and D, first part). The linear distributions of gold particles over >50 µm of CE fragments were summed to obtain more quantitative information (Table I). The distributions were reproducible between multiple experiments with each antibody, but there was wide variation between antibodies probably due to differences in epitope accessibility or abundance. Of three available keratin 1 antibodies, only the new one elicited against the H1 subdomain labeled fragments reliably (Fig. 1C). We also tested for other keratinocyte cell peripheral antigens including alpha 3 integrin (a marker for cell junctions in terminally differentiating keratinocytes (55)) and desmoplakin (56) (a marker of desmosomal junctions) as well as two markers for hemidesmosomal junctions, plectin (57) and BPAG1 (58). All of these were negative (Fig. 1A for desmoplakin).


Fig. 1. Pre-embedding labeling and examination by immunogold electron microscopy of mature CEs. First column, CEs after purification with no treatments; second column, CEs after a 6-h digestion with trypsin; third column, CEs after saponification; fourth column, saponified CEs after a 3-h trypsin digestion. The four epitopes probed were desmoplakin (A), involucrin (B), keratin 1 (C), and loricrin (D). Scale bars, 100 nm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (61K GIF file)]


Table I.

Distribution of labeling (gold particles/µm) of untreated and saponified CEs

The numbers in parenthesis are the total numbers of gold particles measured.
Side Desmoplakin Involucrin Keratin 1 Loricrin

Mature CEs from foreskin epidermal stratum corneum
  Intact 1 <1 (11) 3 (169) 6 (309) 39 (2101)
2 <1 (2) <1 (19) 1 (47) 1 (50)
  Double labeling 1 <1 (12) 34 (2011)
2 4 (227) 1 (41)
  + Trypsin 1 <1 (13) <1 (11) <1 (9) 38 (2132)
2 <1 (0) <1 (1) <1 (2) <1 (22)
  + Saponification 1 16 (925) 19 (977) 12 (618) 37 (2141)
2 <1 (16) <1 (34) 8 (411) 2 (121)
  Double labeling 1 <1 (18) 33 (1789)
2 23 (1249) 1 (50)
1 <1 (13) 35 (2171)
2 23 (1429) 1 (43)
  + Saponification 1 <1 (3) <1 (5) <1 (12) 36 (2303)
  + Trypsin 2 <1 (10) <1 (3) <1 (9) 39 (2494)
Antibody controls
  Preimmune serum <1 (15) <1 (8) <1 (9) <1 (11)
  Secondary antibody <1 (1) <1 (1) <1 (6) <1 (7)

Following digestion with trypsin, epitopes for involucrin and K1 were lost, but epitopes for loricrin were retained (Fig. 1A, second part), as described previously (44).

Next, mature CEs were treated with methanol/KOH (saponification), washed, and probed for the several epitopes. As a control, we found that there was little change in the amount or distribution of loricrin labeling between intact and saponified CEs (Fig. 1D, compare first and third parts; Table I); i.e. saponification had not altered the accessibility of loricrin epitopes on the cytoplasmic side. However, epitopes for desmoplakin, involucrin, and keratin 1 (but none of the other cell peripheral antigens tested) became exposed in substantial amounts (Fig. 1, A-C, third part; Table I). By use of double labeling experiments, we found that desmoplakin (Fig. 2A) and involucrin (Fig. 2B) labeling occurred on the side opposite to that of loricrin (Table I). This means that epitopes for desmoplakin and involucrin had become exposed after saponification. Similarly, epitopes of keratin 1 became exposed on both sides after saponification (Table I). Based on previous immunogold decoration studies, most of the keratin labeling on the cytoplasmic side was due to contaminating protein (44); thus, keratin 1 epitopes also became exposed on the delipidized inner surface.


Fig. 2. Pre-embedding double labeling and examination by immunogold electron microscopy. Samples were labeled following an initial trypsinization and then saponification. Antibodies used were desmoplakin (10-nm gold) and loricrin (5-nm gold) (A) and involucrin (10-nm gold) and loricrin (5-nm gold) (B). Scale bars, 100 nm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (92K GIF file)]


Trypsin digestion after saponification removed ~25% of the total CE protein and resulted in loss of most epitopes, except only for those of loricrin, which became exposed on both sides (Fig. 1D, fourth part; Table I). Mathematical modeling (38, 44) of the amino acid compositions of the solubilized tryptic peptides showed marked enrichment for involucrin, whereas the 75% protein in the insoluble remnant was estimated to be >90% loricrin.

Together, these data suggest that the lipid layer of mature CEs had masked epitopes for certain inner CE protein components, which on exposure could be easily removed, leaving a remnant consisting almost entirely of polyloricrin.

CEs from Immature Foreskin Epidermis

Immature CEs obtained from the inner living layers of foreskin epidermis constituted about 1% of the protein mass of the epidermis, which is about one-tenth of that for mature CEs. By light microscopy, they consisted of mixtures, from "fragile" translucent to more rigid structures as reported previously (3) (data not shown). They are expected to contain only traces of lipids (3, 51). These mixed CEs were estimated to contained about 30% loricrin. Preliminary immunogold analyses revealed similar distributions of gold particles for the same antigens shown in Fig. 1 (data not shown). In contrast to the mature CEs, however, digestion with trypsin solubilized ~85% of the total protein. The undigested remnant was estimated to be highly enriched for loricrin.

Characterization of Tryptic Peptides From CEs

The tryptic peptides from mature CEs were recovered for sequencing analysis in the following way. First, the CEs were digested to completion with trypsin to remove ~5% of contaminating adherent non-cross-linked protein, mostly consisting of keratins and filaggrin (42, 44). This fraction contained <0.5% of the total CE cross-link. The remnant was subjected to saponification and then redigested to completion with trypsin, which solubilized 19.5% of total CE protein mass, which contained 12.7 of 89 nmol of cross-link/mg of total CE protein. Following a brief digestion with proteinase K, the peptides were fractionated by HPLC (Fig. 3). In this way, 187 peptides ~15-50 residues long were recovered and sequenced, of which 157 contained one or more cross-link, so that they contained two or more "peptide branches." In almost all cases, the structures of the peptides were solved in the sense that (i) in the two or more branches, the exact identity of the protein and the location within the protein was identified and (ii) we could unambiguously assign which glutamine(s) and lysine(s) were linked by the isopeptide cross-link. Table II illustrates examples of how sequence information was assigned. Together, the recovered and sequenced peptides included 402 peptide branches and accounted for 89% of the total amount of cross-link in the unfractionated tryptic peptide preparation (Table III); the remaining cross-link was present as short unresolvable peptides that eluted very early on the HPLC column (Fig. 3).


Fig. 3. Fractionation of tryptic/proteinase K peptides of saponified mature CEs by HPLC.
[View Larger Version of this Image (27K GIF file)]


Table II.

Examples of interchain cross-linked peptides

Single-letter codes for amino acids are used, and amounts are given in pmol in parenthesis (Footnotes a-c). Data are corrected for 5-10% carry-over between cycles. PTH-Cys is not seen directly but is inferred from the appearance of its degradation product, PTH-dehydroalanine. Peptides were bound to a solid support by water-soluble carbodiimide through carboxyl groups, so that the amount of PTH-derivative released at the carboxyl terminus or at an expected Asp or Glu residue is substoichiometric. X, PTH-cross-link.
Example 1a

Interchain involucrin cross-link
      L E Q E E K Q L E L Involucrin Gln465
          :
L E Q E E K Q L E Involucrin Lys468
Example 2b

Solved interchain multiprotein cross-link
E K Q E A Q L Involucrin Lys485
  :
A Q L L Q D E S S Y E K D L Unknown Gln3-Gln6
        :
      E K Q E A Q L E L P E Q Q V Involucrin Lys485-Gln495
                            :
                  I L T C P K T K Desmoplakin Lys1659
Example 3c

Solved four-branched interchain involucrin cross-linked peptide
N L E Q E E K Q L E L Involucrin Lys468
            :
          E Q E E K Q L E L Involucrin Gln465-Lys468
                  :
                E Q E E K Q L E L Involucrin Gln465-Lys468
                        :
                  N L E Q E E K Q L Involucrin Gln465

a  See Table VI, peptide 10, first item. Cycle 1: L (295); cycle 2: E (145); cycle 3: Q (135); cycle 4: E (130); cycle 5: E (95); cycle 6: K (145), X (120); cycle 7: Q (230); cycle 8: L (230); cycle 9: E (60); cycle 10: L (20). (i) The sequence(s) are human involucrin. (ii) The molar amount of PTH-Gln released at cycle 3 is ~0.5. (iii) Both PTH-X and PTH-Lys (~0.5 mol each) are released at cycle 6. Therefore, two identical peptide sequences are present, cross-linked through Gln465 of one and Lys468 of the other.
b  See Table VI, peptide 17. Cycle 1: E (10), A (30), I (30); cycle 2: X (30), L (30); cycle 3: Q (55), T (30), L (30); cycle 4: E (10), L (30); cycle 5: A (55), P (25), X (25); cycle 6: Q (50), D (5); cycle 7: T (25), E (10), L (45); cycle 8: S (15), E (10), K (5); cycle 9: S (15), L (20); cycle 10: P (20), Y (15); cycle 11: E (5); cycle 12: K (10), X (15); cycle 13: D (~2), Q (10); cycle 14: V (~2) L (~2). (i) The data show that four different peptide sequences were present, joined by three cross-links. The sequences were determined empirically and then confirmed by use of the Swiss Protein Database. The strong clues were that these four sequences were commonly identified in the large body of cross-linked peptides analyzed in this study (summarized in Tables III and VI), and that two involucrin sequences, one longer, were present. (ii) In the involucrin sequences, the Lys485 residues were not seen; and in the longer, one Gln495 was not seen. (iii) In the unknown sequence, the two Gln residues were not seen. (iv) Therefore, the long involucrin and the unknown sequences served as cross-bridges for the desmoplakin and short involucrin sequence. (v) Because one X was released at cycle 2, it is most likely that Lys485 of the short involucrin sequence was cross-linked to Gln3 of the unknown sequence and that Lys1659 of desmoplakin was cross-linked to Gln495 of the longer involucrin sequence.
c  See Table VI, peptide 18. Cycle 1: N (105), E (20); cycle 2: L (200); cycle 3: E (30); cycle 4: Q (100), E (20); cycle 5: E (30), X (195); cycle 6: Q (195), E (20); cycle 7: K (100), X (95), L (190); cycle 8: Q (185), E (15); cycle 9: L (140); cycle 10: E (10); cycle 11: L (5). (i) The strong clue here is that at cycle 7 four equimolar derivatives were released, suggesting that the peptide contains four branches adjoined by three cross-links. (ii) Based on the types of residues released, the sequences are almost certainly involucrin. (iii) A second strong clue is that Asn residues are rare in involucrin. (iv) From cycles 1 and 2 and cycles 7-11, using the derivatives released at ~100 pmol/cycle, the sequences can be identified unambiguously as lying between involucrin residues 462 and 472. (v) With this information, it becomes clear there are two pairs of sequences: NLEQEEKQLEL, and EQEEKQLEL each pair offset by two residues. Note: the low yields of E and L at cycles 10 and 11 imply their presence on only one sequence, shown at the top. (vi) In the first pair, Gln465 is seen once, but not both times; in the second pair, both Gln465 and Lys468 are not seen but are released as X. (vii) Thus, the second pair of sequences serve as cross-bridges. (viii) Therefore Lys468 on one branch is cross-linked to a Gln465 on a second branch; its neighboring Lys468 is cross-linked to Gln465 on a third branch; its neighboring Lys468 is cross-linked to Gln465 on a fourth branch.

Table III.

Occurrences of sequences of known proteins in cross-linked peptides


Proteina Mature CEs
Immature CEs
3 h trypsin/0.5 h proteinase K after saponification
9 h proteinase K before saponificationc
Number Yieldb Number Yieldb Number Yieldb

Cystatin alpha  (36) 15 1690 (8.0%) 21 1010 (8.9%)
Desmoplakin (45) 18 1250 (5.9%) 26 1270 (11.2%) 1 20 (<0.1%)
Elafin (55) 21 1520 (7.2%) 16 250 (2.2%) 18 7060 (10.9%)
Filaggrin (4) 4 40 (<0.1%)
Involucrin (256) 95 3610 (17.1%) 161 4510 (39.9%)
Keratin 1 (54) 37 850 (4.0%) 11 340 (3.0%) 6 70 (0.1%)
Keratin 2e (7) 2 50 (0.1%) 4 60 (0.5%) 1 2 (<0.1%)
Keratin 5 (55) 43 1100 (5.2%) 12 390 (3.4%)
Keratin 10 (5) 2 50 (0.1%) 2 20 (0.2%) 1 10 (<0.1%)
Loricrin (458) 110 7540 (35.7%) 59 1150 (10.2%) 289 54,530 (84.0%)
Spr1 or Spr3 (31) 12 590 (2.8%) 7 50 (0.4%) 12 1820 (2.8%)
Spr2 (25) 10 420 (2.0%) 7 40 (0.3%) 8 1100 (1.7%)
Unknown (93) 18 1940 (9.2%) 71 1850 (16.5%) 4 120 (0.2%)
Unidentified (29) 14 510 (2.3%) 9 360 (3.1%) 6 170 (0.4%)
Number of peptides 131 157 155
Number of peptide "branches" 380 402 356
Total amount of cross-link in CEs (nmol/mg protein) 26.7 nmol/mg 12.7 of 89 nmol/mg 70.5 of 89 nmol/mg
Cross-link recovery 21.1 of 26.7 (79%) 11.3 of 12.7 (89%) 64.9 of 70.5 (92%)

a  The number in parenthesis is the total number of occurrences of the protein in the three experiments.
b  Yields are in pmol. Percentages of the molar total in each experiment are shown in parenthesis.
c  Data are from Ref. 42 and involve 356 separate sequences from 145 solved and 10 unsolved peptides. (Note that four of the peptide sequences that were previously unidentified were the same as the present unknown protein).

The solubilized tryptic peptides from the immature CEs were resolved (data not shown) and characterized similarly. In this case, the peptides contained 26.7 nmol of cross-link/mg of CE protein, of which 21.1 nmol (79%) could be accounted for in 131 peptides having 380 peptide branches. However, in three four-branched peptides, there was no unique solution as to which glutamine was cross-linked to which lysine (data not shown).

Analysis of Complete List of Sequences

Table III lists the yields and proteins of origin of the peptide branches from both sources of CEs, as well as the data for proteinase K digestion of mature CEs obtained previously (42). More than 83% (molar basis) of the sequences exactly matched known or suspected CE structural proteins (26, 42), of which by far the most abundant were involucrin (256 sequences; 36 or 14% molar basis) and loricrin (169 new sequences, total of 458). Interestingly, the third most abundant were a group of three closely related peptides (total of 93 times, 17 or 9% molar basis) of unknown identity, but they are homologous to human desmoplakin (59), BPAG1 (60), and plectin (61) (Table IV). The new cross-linked peptides involving loricrin discovered here were found to use the same glutamines and lysines of loricrin as seen before, so that the molar usage of these residues remained unchanged (42). All of the cross-links involving Spr1 and Spr2 proteins and elafin used amino- or carboxyl-terminal sequences as seen before, confirming the idea that these proteins serve as cross-bridges between CE proteins, usually loricrin (42). A fourth major group of sequences involved the type II keratins 1, 2e and 5, which will be described in detail elsewhere. Table V lists the frequency of cross-linking between various protein partner pairs.

Table IV.

Unknown peptide sequence is related but not identical to human bullous pemphigoid antigen, desmoplakin, and plectin

Sequences are from desmoplakin (position 1640) (59), bullous pemphigoid antigen (position 2034) (60), and plectin (position 4517) (61). Amino acids shown in boldface type participate in identified cross-links.
Unknown variants
  46 times     A Q L L Q D E S S F E K D L
  34 times     A Q L L Q D E S S Y E K D L
  13 times     A Q L L Q D A S S F E K V L
Human plectin R T A Q K L R D V G A Y S K Y L T C P K T K
Human desmoplakin R A A Q R L Q D T S S Y A K Y L T C P K T K
Human BPAG1 L I A T K L K D Q K S Y V R N I I C P Q T K

Table V.

Frequency of cross-linking between identified protein partners


Cystatin alpha Desmoplakin Elafin Filaggrin Unknown Involucrin Keratin Loricrin Sprs

Cystatin alpha 0
Desmoplakin 6 0
Elafin 3 4 0
Filaggrin 0 0 1 0
Unknown 3 15 4 0 0
Involucrin 9 18 5 0 27 162
Keratin 4 0 13 0 31 8 0
Loricrin 11 0 26 4 10 25 53 289
Sprs 1 2 0 0 3 2 6 40 0

Analysis of the Involucrin Cross-links

Sequences involving involucrin were the second most abundant (Table VI). Most notably, it was evident that of a total of 150 glutamines and 45 lysines in involucrin (62), only a limited selection of them was used for cross-linking to specific proteins. In all 27 occurrences, the "unknown" protein was cross-linked only by way of involucrin lysine 485. In all 18 occurrences, involucrin glutamine 495 or 496 was used only to cross-link to desmoplakin. The type II keratin chains 1, 2e, or 5 usually used involucrin glutamine 288. In other cases, there was somewhat less sequence specificity. Involucrin-involucrin cross-links involved glutamines 465 and 489 and lysines 468, 485, or 508; loricrin was cross-linked by way of several glutamines (308, 309, 368, 369, 425, 426, 455, or 456); and in involucrin-cystatin alpha  and involucrin-elafin cross-links, as many as six glutamines each were used, although the exact residues were uncertain because of peptide repeats in involucrin. All of these residue positions are located in the center of involucrin, encompassing its modern sequences (62, 63).

Table VI.

Cross-links involving involucrin

The data are generated from a total of 109 peptides from the two experiments involving one or more involucrin branches, for a total of 256 involucrin sequences. In experiments where the same sequence appeared several times, the peptides were separable by HPLC due to varying lengths of the branches.
Proteins Number of peptides Immature Mature saponified Site(s) on involucrina Site(s) on other protein

Dipeptides
  1. Involucrin-cystatin alpha 9 2 7 Gln172/Gln262 Lys46
Gln292/Gln342
Gln392/Gln402
  2. Involucrin-desmoplakin 3 1 2 Gln495 Lys1659
5 1 4 Gln496 Lys1659
3 2 1 Gln496 Lys1661
2 0 2 Gln496 Lys1667
  3. Involucrin-elafin 5 2 3 Gln158/Gln178 Lys6
Gln188/Gln198
Gln208/Gln218
  4. Involucrin-unknown 10 2 8 Lys485 Gln3
5 1 4 Lys485 Gln6
  5. Involucrin-keratin 1 1 0 1 Gln168/Gln328 Lys73
  6. Involucrin-keratin 2e 2 1 1 Gln288 Lys69
  7. Involucrin-keratin 5 5 1 4 Gln288 Lys71
  8. Involucrin-Spr1 2 1 1 Gln455 Lys88
  9. Involucrin-loricrin 2 1 1 Gln308 Lys307
1 0 1 Gln309 Lys4
3 1 2 Gln368 Lys4
1 0 1 Gln368 Lys307
1 0 1 Gln369 Lys4
2 1 1 Gln425 Lys4
2 2 0 Gln425 Lys88
2 1 1 Gln425 Lys307
2 1 1 Gln426 Lys4
1 0 1 Gln426 Lys307
1 1 0 Gln426 Lys315
2 1 1 Gln455 Lys4
2 2 0 Gln455 Lys307
1 1 0 Gln456 Lys4
1 1 0 Gln456 Lys315
  10. Involucrin-Involucrin 14 5 9 Gln465-Lys468
9 3 6 Gln465-Lys485
5 2 3 Gln465-Lys508
10 5 5 Gln489-Lys468
9 3 6 Gln489-Lys485
Tripeptides
  11. Involucrin-desmoplakin-involucrin 2 1 1 Gln496
Lys1659-Lys1661
Gln496
  12. Involucrin-unknown-involucrin 6 3 3 Lys485
Gln3-Gln6
Lys485
  13. Involucrin-unknown-cystatin alpha 1 1 0 Lys485
Gln3-Gln6
Lys46
  14. Involucrin-involucrin-desmoplakin 2 1 1 Gln465
Lys485-Gln496
Lys1661
  15. Involucrin-loricrin-involucrin 1 1 0 Gln425
Lys307
Gln455
  16. Involucrin-involucrin-involucrin 8 4 4 Gln465
Lys468-Gln465
Lys485
Tetrapeptides
  17. Involucrin-unknown-involucrin-desmoplakin 1 1 Lys485
Gln3-Gln6
Lys485-Gln495
Lys1659
  18. Involucrin-involucrin-involucrin-involucrin 5 5 Gln465
Lys468-Gln465
Lys468-Gln465
Lys468
  19. Involucrin-involucrin-involucrin-involucrin Gln465
Lys485-Gln489
Lys485-Gln489
2 1 1 Lys468
2 2 Lys485
1 1 Lys508

a  In sequences denoted by a slash, the exact residue position is uncertain due to involucrin sequence repeats.

Likewise, there was considerable conservation in the glutamine or lysine residues used for cross-linking within the other proteins, including elafin, cystatin alpha , and the keratins. In the case of desmoplakin, only two lysines in the entire sequence were used, located on its carboxyl tail at the end the C domain (59). Similarly, only two glutamines were used in homologous sequences of the unknown protein.

Thus, involucrin participated in many interchain cross-links with multiple different partner proteins (Table V). In some multibranched peptides, involucrin was cross-linked by intermediary proteins such as desmoplakin, loricrin, and the unknown protein (Table VI, peptides 11, 12, and 15). In these cases, they seemed to serve as interchain cross-bridging proteins between involucrin and/or between themselves. Moreover, in ~60% (molar total) of peptides, involucrin was cross-linked to itself (Tables V and VI). Because of the close juxtaposition of the participating glutamines (often 465) and lysines (often 468) within involucrin (see especially peptides 16, 18, and 19), it seems possible that these are interchain cross-links, since steric effects are likely to preclude cross-linking by transglutaminase enzyme(s) of neighboring residues (64).


DISCUSSION

The Importance of Involucrin

Historically, involucrin was the first protein to be identified as a constituent of the CE formed in epithelial cells (16). Many studies have since characterized in detail its expression, in vitro transglutaminase cross-linking, biochemical properties, and structural properties (reviewed in Refs. 3, 4, and 21). The data from all of these studies are consistent with the view that involucrin is a covalently attached "early" component of the CE. One extant hypothesis holds that it may serve as a scaffold for the later attachment of other CE structural proteins (3, 4, 20, 21, 44, 65).

Two recent studies have shown unequivocally that the same involucrin-immunoreactive fragments can be released from CEs of foreskin epidermis and cultured keratinocytes by use of CNBr methods (21, 66), indicating that involucrin is covalently attached to the CEs. A 68-kDa fragment was released, which indicates that it had been covalently linked by way of the amino-terminal half of the intact protein (66). However, to date, sequences of involucrin joined together by way of the isopeptide cross-link to itself or another protein have not been isolated and characterized, as has been the case for several other "later" CE proteins (26, 42). The present study reports the identification and characterization of a large number of peptides containing one or more cross-links that adjoin involucrin to itself and/or to other proteins. These data, together with our immunogold work, provide important information on the likely multiple roles of involucrin in the CE. Our data are predicated on the operational definition of the CE as that which is insoluble after exhaustive extraction with powerful protein solvents that break disulfide bonds but not peptide bonds; i.e. the CEs used in these studies are an insoluble protein complex cross-linked by isopeptide bonds (38, 42-44). However, it is also possible that involucrin and other structural proteins and enzymes are associated with or even covalently attached to the CE but do not become cross-linked by transglutaminases. In this case, they may be lost by our method of isolation of CEs and thus not recognized in this study.

Cross-linked Involucrin Is Indeed a Major Component of CEs Formed in Vivo

In our previous studies on mature foreskin CEs, we were unable to find cross-linked peptides involving involucrin (42), in part because the exhaustive proteolysis procedures from the cytoplasmic side rendered the peptides too small for sequencing, although they were predicted to be enriched involucrin, and in part because the lipid envelope seemed to have precluded proteolytic access to the inner surface of the CE structure. However, we show here that following alkaline hydrolysis to remove lipids from the mature CEs formed in vivo, epitopes for several proteins become exposed, including involucrin, keratin 1, and desmoplakin. After saponification, trypsin could release about 20% of the protein mass of the CE. Sequencing of these peptides revealed prominent amounts of interchain cross-linked species involving these proteins, of which involucrin was in fact the most abundant (40%; Table III). Many peptides involved interchain cross-links between involucrin and itself, or cystatin alpha , elafin, the type II keratins 1, 2e, and 5, desmoplakin, or a novel protein of unknown identity.

In addition, peptides released from the immature CEs formed in vivo, in which lipid envelope assembly was presumed to have been incomplete (3, 51) and which contained less loricrin, also contained abundant amounts of interchain cross-linked involucrin (~17%; Table III). Many of these cross-linked peptides involved the same protein and amino acid residue partners as found in the mature CEs (Table VI).

Therefore, these data establish that involucrin is indeed a major component of the CE and is cross-linked to itself and to several other proteins.

What Is the Unknown Protein?

The nature of the three highly homologous variants of the unknown peptides found in cross-links of these CEs remains uncertain due to the absence of more sequence information. Nevertheless, by searches in protein sequence data bases, they share part of a sequence motif with the terminus of the cytoplasmic domain of members of the desmoplakin family of proteins that are associated at the point at which intermediate filaments meet desmosomes or hemidesmosomes (67). The sequence variants may be polymorphisms of a novel single protein, or they may represent individual members of a new family of desmoplakin-like proteins. One candidate is IFAP-300, previously identified as an important protein at the point where keratin intermediate filaments meet desmoplakin (68, 69), but other proteins cannot be excluded at this time (18, 58, 70-72).

Involucrin Is a Quantitatively Major Early CE Protein Component

Several types of data have suggested previously that involucrin is an early CE protein component (3, 4, 21). Our new data confirm this concept. First, the saponification procedure allowed proteolytic release of about 20% of the CE protein that was especially enriched in involucrin, but contained only a minor proportion of the amounts of the known late CE proteins elafin, Sprs, and loricrin (Table III). In addition, we found that involucrin was located predominantly on the side opposite to that of loricrin (Fig. 2B, Table I). This is consistent with the idea that it had been accumulated onto the CE prior to loricrin.

Second, based on the yields of proteins released by proteolysis with different enzymes both before (late proteins) and after (early proteins) saponification (Table III), we can make estimates more accurately than heretofore possible of their total amounts in intact mature CEs (Fig. 4). As foreshadowed in earlier predictive analyses (3, 4, 21, 38, 44), these data illustrate quantitatively the inverse relationship between the amounts of early proteins involucrin and cystatin alpha  (and the newly encountered desmoplakin and unknown proteins), and the late proteins elafin, Sprs, and loricrin. The cross-link data from immature CEs, presumably obtained for CEs of an early degree of maturation, seem to afford an intermediary stage in this progression. These analyses provide the best evidence to date for the likelihood of an orderly temporal accumulation of proteins as the CE is assembled (3, 44). We calculate that mature foreskin epidermal CEs contain about 5.5% involucrin and 2-3% each of desmoplakin and the unknown proteins but more than 70% loricrin. This value for involucrin is about twice that estimated by mathematical modeling (38, 44) but is within the range of accuracy of the method. Furthermore, since the CE itself is 10% of the mass of cornified keratinocyte, of which 90% is protein (3, 4), this means that 0.4-0.5% of the protein mass of the epidermis is involucrin cross-linked in the CE. Since involucrin constitutes about 1% of total epidermal keratinocyte cell protein (20, 73), this suggests that only part of it in fact becomes tightly cross-linked to the CE. This raises the intriguing possibility that a considerable amount of involucrin is associated with the CE in other ways: e.g. (i) is covalently attached by some other methods (including disulfide bonds, polyamines, or lipids); (ii) is partially cross-linked through glutamine and lysine residues other than those reported here (66); (iii) remains soluble; or (iv) may be utilized for some other purpose in the keratinocyte.


Fig. 4. Estimated molar amounts of CE structural proteins. The data are from Table III. Data for summed mature CEs are calculated from the relative molar amounts in the saponified samples (11.3 nmol) and proteinase K-digested samples (42) (64.9 nmol), expressed as a percentage of the total of 76.2 nmol.
[View Larger Version of this Image (24K GIF file)]


Third, we are intrigued by the abundance of cross-links between involucrin and carboxyl-terminal sequences of desmoplakin. Desmoplakin is a major structural protein of desmosomes. While part is perhaps anchored at the cell junction, a central rod domain projects into the cytoplasm, and a series of peptide repeating domains at the carboxyl-terminal end are believed to interact directly or indirectly with cytoskeletal intermediate filaments (56, 59). Our pre-embedded electron microscopy images show that in isolated CEs the desmosomes have lost their structural integrity, but desmosomal remnants could be recognized by the fact that desmoplakin antigens were exposed and located in thickened zones along the CE fragments (Fig. 1A, third part). The isolation of cross-links involving desmoplakin carboxyl-terminal sequences indicates that at least this portion had become attached to the CE by the action of transglutaminases. Perhaps more substantial portions of desmoplakin also form part of the CE, since epitopes thought to be located within its rod domain were recognized by the polyclonal antibody (Fig. 1A, third part). Moreover, we found remarkable specificity in cross-linking, since only two glutamines (residues 495 and 496) of involucrin were used to cross-link to only three lysines of desmoplakin (residues 1659, 1661, and 1667) (Table VI). Notably, in vitro cross-linking experiments with the model amine donor putrescine have documented previously that glutamines 495 and 496 are the most highly reactive residues in involucrin (19). An earlier study reported immunogold localization of two monoclonal antibodies to desmosomal remnants in cornifying epidermal cells (74), which may be related to desmoplakin or the unknown proteins described here. Therefore, further experiments now will be required to test the interesting possibility that the cross-linking of involucrin onto desmosomal proteins may be a very early step in CE assembly.

The Multiple Scaffold Roles of Involucrin

Previous structural analyses have suggested that involucrin may function as a scaffold during the assembly of the CE (4, 21). The data of Tables V and VI provide robust support for this concept. First, involucrin was most commonly interchain cross-linked to itself by way of neighboring lysines and glutamines (Table VI, peptides 10, 14, 16, 18, and 19). Second, >20% of involucrin cross-links involved other early CE components such as desmoplakin, cystatin alpha , and the unknown protein (peptides 1, 2, 4, 11-14, and 17). However, another 15% of involucrin cross-links involved the late CE proteins elafin, loricrin, and Sprs (peptides 3, 5-9, and 15). Taken together, these observations indicate that an intermolecularly cross-linked polymeric layer involucrin not only seems to form an early part of the CE but also serves as a platform for the addition of the late CE proteins.

We show here that the removal of much of the lipids (possibly mostly ester-linked ceramides) exposes the involucrin-rich inner portion of the CE. This supports the prediction that involucrin may serve as a scaffold for the covalent attachment of CE lipids (6, 75).

Redundancy of Cross-linking between Proteins

The summary data of Table V provide information on the frequency of cross-links between the several CE proteins. Mostly, involucrin (>60%) and loricrin (>50%) were cross-linked to themselves. However, some proteins had preferred cross-linked partners such as desmoplakin with involucrin or the unknown protein; the unknown protein with involucrin or keratins; and Sprs with loricrin, etc. More significantly, while most proteins had multiple cross-linked partners, involucrin and loricrin were the most versatile, having eight each. In part, this could be explained in terms of the multiple scaffold roles of involucrin. An alternative or concurrent possibility is that there is considerable redundancy in the assembly of proteins into the CE structure, both during its early stages and then later in the final reinforcement stages of its assembly. This conclusion may offer an explanation of why the substantial overexpression of involucrin in transgenic mice leads to a negative phenotype in the epidermis, internal epithelia, and hair follicle (23); a too dense layer of cross-linked involucrin may interfere with redundant cross-linking. In contrast, loricrin overexpression appears to have no ill effect (28). Conversely, it could be predicted that diminished levels of involucrin may not cause a seriously negative phenotype.

Conclusion

Mathematical modeling has suggested that CEs from cultured keratinocytes contain significantly more of the early proteins involucrin and cystatin alpha  (38) and perhaps, in view of the present data, desmoplakin as well. Moreover, such CEs can be decorated with involucrin antibodies (21, 22, 76). Thus, cultured keratinocytes may provide a valuable system with which to explore further the earliest stages of CE assembly. Mutational analyses of the specific glutamine or lysine residues used for cross-linking of involucrin or desmoplakin discovered here could be explored in culture systems.


FOOTNOTES

*   The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed: Bldg. 6 Room 425, NIAMS, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-2752. Tel.: 301-496-1578; Fax: 301-402-2886; E-mail: pemast{at}helix.nih.gov.
1    The abbreviations used are: CE, cornified cell envelope; PTH, phenylthiohydantoin; HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography; Spr, small proline-rich family of proteins, consisting of several members such as Spr1, etc.

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs. Vincenzo De Laurenzi, Peter Elias, Tonja Kartasova, and Edit Tarcsa for stimulating discussions.


Note Added in Proof

Subsequent to submission of this manuscript an article was published describing the novel cell envelope protein envoplakin (Ruhrberg, C., Haijibagheri, M. A. N., Simon, M., Dooley, T. P., and Watt, F. M. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 134, 715-729). The sequence of the second "unknown" protein variant described in Table IV of our paper is identical to human envoplakin. The other unknown variants described in our paper may be polymorphisms of envoplakin or may represent additional members of this new class of cell envelope proteins.


REFERENCES

  1. Hohl, D. (1990) Dermatologica 180, 201-211 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Greenberg, C. S., Birckbichler, P. J., and Rice, R. H. (1991) FASEB J. 5, 3071-3077 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Reichert, U., Michel, S., and Schmidt, R. (1993) in Molecular Biology of the Skin (Darmon, M., and Blumenberg, M., eds), pp. 107-150, Academic Press, Inc., New York
  4. Eckert, R. L., Yaffe, M. B., Crish, J. F., Murthy, S., Rorke, E. A., and Welter, J. F. (1993) J. Invest. Dermatol. 100, 613-617 [Abstract]
  5. Roop, D. R. (1995) Science 267, 474-475 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Downing, D. T. (1992) J. Lipid Res. 33, 301-313 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Fraser, R. D. B., MacRae, T. P., and Rogers, G. E. (1972) Keratins: Their Composition, Structure and Biosynthesis, C. C. Thomas, Springfield, IL
  8. Zahn, H., Messinger, H., and Höcker, H. (1994) Text. Res. J. 64, 554-555
  9. Kartasova, T., Cornelissen, B. J. C., and van der Putte, P. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 5945-5962 [Abstract]
  10. Takahashi, M., Tezuka, T., and Katunuma, K. (1992) FEBS Lett. 308, 79-82 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Zettergren, J. G., Peterson, L. L., and Wuepper, K. D. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81, 238-242 [Abstract]
  12. Schalkwijk, J., de Roo, C., and de Jongh, G. J. (1991) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1096, 148-154 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Saheki, T., Ito, F., Hagiwara, H., Saito, Y., Kuroki, J., Tachibana, S., and Hirose, S. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 185, 240-245 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Molhuizen, H. O. F., Alkemade, H. A. C., Zeeuwen, P. L. J. M., de Jongh, G. J., Wieringa, B., and Schalkwijk, J. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 12028-12032 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Nonomura, K., Yaminishi, K., Yasuno, H., Nara, K., and Hirose, S. (1994) J. Invest. Dermatol. 103, 88-91 [Abstract]
  16. Rice, R. H., and Green, H. (1979) Cell 11, 417-422
  17. Watt, F. M., and Green, H. (1981) J. Cell Biol. 90, 738-742 [Abstract]
  18. Simon, M., and Green, H. (1984) Cell 36, 827-834 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Simon, M., and Green, H. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 18093-18098 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Yaffe, M. B., Beegen, H., and Eckert, R. L. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 12233-12238 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Yaffe, M. B., Murthy, S., and Eckert, R. L. (1993) J. Invest. Dermatol. 100, 3-9 [Abstract]
  22. Warhol, M. J., Roth, J., Lucocq, J. M., Pinkus, G. S., and Rice, R. H. (1985) J. Histochem. Cytochem. 33, 141-149 [Abstract]
  23. Crish, J. F., Zaim, T. M., and Eckert, R. L. (1993) Differentiation 53, 191-200 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. de Viragh, P. A., Huber, M., and Hohl, D. (1994) J. Invest. Dermatol. 103, 815-819 [Abstract]
  25. Mehrel, T., Hohl, D., Rothnagel, J. A., Longley, M. A., Bundman, D., Cheng, C., Lichti, U., Bisher, M. E., Steven, A. C., Steinert, P. M., Yuspa, S. H., and Roop, D. R. (1990) Cell 61, 1103-1112 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Hohl, D., Mehrel, T., Lichti, U., Turner, M. L., Roop, D. R., and Steinert, P. M. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 6626-6636 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Yoneda, K., Hohl, D., McBride, O. W., Wang, M., Cehrs, K. U., Idler, W. W., and Steinert, P. M. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 18060-18066 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Yoneda, K., and Steinert, P. M. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 10754-10758 [Abstract]
  29. Rothnagel, J. A., Longley, M. A., Bundman, D. S., Naylor, S. L., Lalley, P. A., Jemkins, N. A., Gilbert, D. J., Copeland, N. G., and Roop, D. R. (1994) Genomics 23, 450-456 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Candi, E., Melino, G., Mei, G., Tarcsa, E., Chung, S.-I., Marekov, L. N., and Steinert, P. M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 26382-26390 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Kartasova, T., and van de Putte, P. (1988) Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 2195-2203 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Marvin, K. W., George, M. D., Fujimoto, W., Saunders, N. A., Bernacki, S. H., and Jetten, A. M. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 11026-11030 [Abstract]
  33. Gibbs, S., Fijneman, R., Wiegart, J., Geurts van Kessel, A., van de Putte, P., and Backendorf, C. (1993) Genomics 16, 630-637 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Greco, M. A., Lorand, L., Lane, W. S., Baden, H. P., Parameswaran, K. N. P., and Kvedar, J. V. (1995) J. Invest. Dermatol. 104, 204-210 [Abstract]
  35. Hohl, H., de Viragh, P. A., Amiguet-Barras, F., Gibbs, S., Backendorf, C., and Huber, M. (1995) J. Invest. Dermatol. 104, 902-905 [Abstract]
  36. Kartasova, T., Darwiche, N., Kohno, Y., Koizumi, H., Osada, S., Huh, N., Lichti, U., Steinert, P. M., and Kuroki, T. (1996) J. Invest. Dermatol. 106, 294-304 [Abstract]
  37. Richards, M., Scott, I. R., Harding, C. R., Liddell, J. E., Powell, G. M., and Curtis, C. G. (1988) Biochem. J. 253, 153-160 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Steven, A. C., and Steinert, P. M. (1994) J. Cell Sci. 107, 693-700 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Abernathy, J. L., Hill, R. L., and Goldsmith, L. A. (1977) J. Biol. Chem. 252, 1837-1839 [Abstract]
  40. Ming, M. E., Daryanami, H. A., Roberts, J. E., Haimowitz, J. E., and Kvedar, J. C. (1993) J. Invest. Dermatol. 100, 578
  41. Lee, S.-C., Kim, I.-G., Marekov, L. N., O'Keefe, E. J., Parry, D. A. D., and Steinert, P. M. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 12164-12176 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Steinert, P. M., and Marekov, L. N. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 17702-17711 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Jarnik, M., Kartasova, T., Steinert, P. M., Lichti, U., and Steven, A. C. (1996) J. Cell Sci. 109, 1381-1391 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Steinert, P. M. (1995) Cell Death & Differ. 2, 33-41
  45. Negri, A. P., Cornell, H. J., and Rivett, D. E. (1993) Text. Res. J. 63, 109-115
  46. Zhang, B., Healy, P. J., Zhao, Y., Crabb, D. W., and Harris, R. A. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 2425-2427 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Tarcsa, E., Kedei, N., Thomazy, V., and Fesus, L. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 25648-25651 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Steinert, P. M., and Idler, W. W. (1975) Biochem. J. 151, 603-614 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Dale, B. A., Holbrook, K. A., Kimball, J. R., Hoff, M., and Sun, T.-T. (1983) J. Cell Biol. 101, 1257-1269 [Abstract]
  50. Chang, F., Swartzendruber, D. C., Wertz, P. W., and Squier, C. A. (1993) Biochim. Biophys Acta 1150, 98-102 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  51. Elias, P. M., and Feingold, K. R. (1992) Semin. Dermatol. 11, 176-182 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  52. Chipev, C. C., Korge, B. P., Markova, N. G., Bale, S. J., DiGiovanna, J. J., Compton, J. G., and Steinert, P. M. (1992) Cell 70, 821-828 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  53. Roop, D. R., Cheng, C. K., Titterington, L., Meyers, C. A., Stanley, J. R., Steinert, P. M., and Yuspa, S. H. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 8037-8040 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Steven, A. C., Bisher, M. E., Roop, D. R., and Steinert, P. M. (1990) J. Struct. Biol. 104, 150-162 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  55. Watt, F., and Hertle, M. D. (1994) in The Keratinocyte Handbook (Leigh, I. M., Lane, E. B., and Watt, F. M., eds), pp. 153-164, Cambridge University Press
  56. Green, K. J., and Jones, J. C. R. (1990) in Cellular and Molecular Biology of Intermediate Filaments (Goldman, R. D., and Steinert, P. M., eds), pp. 147-174, Plenum Publishing Corp., New York
  57. Foisner, R., Feldman, B., Sander, L., Seifert, G., Artlieb, U., and Wiche, G. (1994) Acta Histochem. 96, 421-438 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  58. Klatte, D. H., Kurpakus, M. A., Grelling, K. A., and Jones, J. C. R. (1989) J Cell Biol. 109, 3773-3390
  59. Green, K. J., Parry, D. A. D., Steinert, P. M., Virata, M. L. A., Wagner, R. M., Angst, B. D., and Nilles, L. A. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 2603-2612 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Tanaka, T., Parry, D. A. D., Klaus-Kovtun, V., Steinert, P. M., and Stanley, J. R. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 12555-12559 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Lu, C.-G., Maercker, C., Castañon, M. J., Hauptmann, R., and Wiche, G. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 4278-4283 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Eckert, R. L., and Green, H. (1988) Cell 46, 583-589
  63. Green, H., and Dijan, P. (1992) Mol. Biol. Evol. 9, 977-1017 [Abstract]
  64. Folk, J. E. (1980) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 49, 517-531 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  65. Ishida-Yamamoto, A., Eady, R. A., Watt, F. M., Roop, D. R., Hohl, D., and Iizuka, H. (1996) J. Histochem. Cytochem. 44, 167-175 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Robinson, N. A., LaCelle, P. T., and Eckert, R. L. (1996) J. Invest. Dermatol. 107, 101-107 [Abstract]
  67. Green, K. J., Virata, M. L., Elgart, G. W., Stanley, J. R., and Parry, D. A. D. (1992) Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 14, 145-153 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  68. Lieska, N., Yang, H.-Y., and Goldman, R. D. (1985) J. Cell Biol. 100, 620-633 [Abstract]
  69. Skalli, O., Jones, J. C. R., Gagescu, R., and Goldman, R. D. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 125, 159-170 [Abstract]
  70. Sonnenberg, A., Lindler, C. J. T., Daams, J. H., and Kennel, S. J. (1990) J. Cell Sci. 96, 201-217
  71. Fujiwara, S., Kohno, K., Iwantatsu, A., Naito, I., and Shinkai, H. (1996) J. Invest. Dermatol. 106, 1125-1130 [Abstract]
  72. Ma, A. S. P., and Sun, T.-T. (1986) J. Cell Biol. 103, 41-48 [Abstract]
  73. Etoh, Y., Simon, M., and Green, H. (1986) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 136, 51-56 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  74. Serre, G., Mils, V., Haftek, M., Vincent, C., Croute, F., Réano, A., Ouhayoun, J.-P., Bettinger, S., and Soleihavoup, J.-P. (1991) J. Invest. Dermatol. 97, 1061-1072 [Abstract]
  75. Lazo, N. D., Meine, J. G., and Downing, D. T. (1995) J. Invest. Dermatol. 105, 296-300 [Abstract]
  76. Watt, F. M., and Green, H. (1982) Nature 295, 434-436 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.