MINIREVIEW:
Regulation of Phosphoinositide-specific Phospholipase C Isozymes*

Sue Goo Rhee Dagger and Yun Soo Bae

From the Laboratory of Cell Signaling, NHLBI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892

INTRODUCTION
PLC Isoforms and Structural Organization
Activation of PLC-beta by G Proteins
Activation of PLC-gamma by Protein Tyrosine Kinases
PTK-independent Activation of PLC-gamma
Activation of PLC-delta
Nuclear PLC
Inhibition of PLC via Protein Kinases A and C
Genetic Mapping and Disruption of PLC Genes and the Relation of PLC to Human Disease
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES


INTRODUCTION

The hydrolysis of a minor membrane phospholipid, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2),1 by a specific phospholipase C (PLC) is one of the earliest key events in the regulation of various cell functions by more than 100 extracellular signaling molecules (1-4). This reaction produces two intracellular messengers, diacylglycerol and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, which mediate the activation of protein kinase C (PKC) and intracellular Ca2+ release, respectively. Furthermore, a decrease in the amount of PIP2 itself in the cell membrane is likely an important signal because the activities of several proteins are modulated by this phospholipid (5). PIP2 is a cofactor for phosphatidylcholine-specific phospholipase D (PLD) and a substrate for phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase), both of which are also receptor-activated effector enzymes. In addition, PIP2 modulates actin polymerization by interacting with various actin-binding proteins and serves as a membrane-attachment site for many signaling proteins that contain pleckstrin homology (PH) domains. Consequently, the activity of PLC is stringently regulated in cells through several distinct mechanisms that link multiple PLC isoforms to various receptors.


PLC Isoforms and Structural Organization

The 10 mammalian PLC isozymes (excluding alternatively spliced forms) identified to date are all single polypeptides and can be divided into three types, beta , gamma , and delta , of which four PLC-beta , two PLC-gamma , and four PLC-delta proteins are known (1-5). The delta -type isozymes are smaller (Mr 85,000) than the PLC-beta and PLC-gamma (Mr 140,000-155,000) isoforms. Lower eukaryotes such as yeast and slime molds contain only delta -type isozymes, suggesting that beta - and gamma -type isoforms in higher eukaryotes evolved from the archetypal PLC-delta .

Two regions of high sequence homology (40-60% identity), designated X and Y, constitute the PLC catalytic domain (1-5) (Fig. 1). A PH domain is located in the NH2-terminal region, preceding the X domain, in all three types of PLC. Whereas PLC-beta and PLC-delta isozymes contain a short sequence of 50-70 amino acids that separates the X and Y regions, PLC-gamma isozymes have a long sequence of ~400 amino acids that contains Src homology (SH) (two SH2 and one SH3) domains. PLC-gamma isozymes contain an additional PH domain that is split by the SH domains. PH (~100 residues), SH2 (~100 residues), and SH3 (~50 residues) domains are protein modules that are shared by many signaling proteins; whereas PH domains mediate interaction with the membrane surface by binding to PIP2, SH domains mediate interactions with other proteins by binding to phosphorylated tyrosine residues (SH2) or proline-rich sequences (SH3).


Fig. 1. Linear representation of the various domains identified in the three types of PLC isozymes. Catalytic domains X and Y as well as PH, EF-hands, C2, and SH (SH2 and SH3) domains are indicated.
[View Larger Version of this Image (20K GIF file)]

The three-dimensional structure of a PLC-delta 1 molecule lacking the PH domain has recently been determined (6). As expected, the X and Y regions are tightly associated. The structure also revealed two accessory modules, an EF-hand domain and a C2 domain, the latter of which was previously suggested to mediate the Ca2+-dependent binding to lipid vesicles. On the basis of the structural information, a catalytic mechanism comprising two steps, tether and fix, was proposed. The PH domain of PLC-delta 1 would tether the enzyme to the membrane by specific binding to PIP2, and the C2 domain would fix the catalytic domain in a productive orientation on the membrane. The EF-hand domain would serve as a flexible link between the PH domain and the rest of the enzyme. Calcium is required for the function of the C2 domain. Another Ca2+ ion located at the active site, together with His311 and His356, directly participates in catalysis, consistent with the fact that all eukaryotic PLC isozymes require Ca2+ for activity, that the two histidines equivalent to His311 and His356 are completely conserved among all PLC isoforms, and that mutation of either of the two histidine residues results in enzyme inactivation (7).

The multidomain structure observed with PLC-delta 1 is likely to be common to all mammalian PLC isoforms (Fig. 1). However, PLC-beta and PLC-gamma isozymes contain additional regulatory COOH-terminal and SH domains, respectively. These regulatory domains are responsible for the fact that different PLC isozymes are linked to receptors through distinct mechanisms. Furthermore, the COOH-terminal domain of PLC-beta isozymes might contribute to the tethering of the enzyme to the membrane surface, given that truncation of this domain completely blocked membrane association of PLC-beta 1 (8). The SH domains of PLC-gamma appear to play a critical role in mitogenic signaling independently of PLC activity; catalytically inactive mutants of PLC-gamma (containing mutations at the essential His residues) elicited a mitogenic response when microinjected into NIH 3T3 cells, and mitogenic activity was localized to the SH region (7, 9).


Activation of PLC-beta by G Proteins

The alpha  subunits (alpha q, alpha 11, alpha 14, and alpha 16) of all four members of the Gq subfamily of heterotrimeric G proteins activate PLC-beta isozymes but not PLC-gamma 1 or PLC-delta 1 (1-4, 10) (Fig. 2). The receptors that activate this Gqalpha -PLC-beta pathway include those for thromboxane A2, bradykinin, bombesin, angiotensin II, histamine, vasopressin, acetylcholine (muscarinic m1 and m3), alpha 1-adrenergic agonists, thyroid-stimulating hormone, C-C and C-X-C chemokines, and endothelin-1 (4, 11).


Fig. 2. Receptor-induced activation of PLC-beta isozymes by Gqalpha and Gbeta gamma subunits.
[View Larger Version of this Image (26K GIF file)]

The GTPgamma S-activated Galpha q or Galpha 11 subunits stimulate PLC-beta isoforms with the rank order of potency PLC-beta >=  PLC-beta 3 > PLC-beta 2 (4, 5). PLC-beta 4 is also activated by Gqalpha subunits; however, because the basal activity of this enzyme is inhibited by ribonucleotides, including GTPgamma S, accurate estimation of the extent of activation is difficult (12). All four Gqalpha members are palmitoylated at residues Cys9 and Cys10 (13). Removal of the two palmitate groups affects neither the capacity of the proteins to activate PLC-beta 1 nor their association with the cell membrane. Galpha 16, which is detected only in hematopoietic cells and is distantly related to the more widely expressed Galpha q (amino acid sequence identity of 55%), activates PLC-beta 1, -beta 2, and -beta 3 in a manner essentially indistinguishable from that of Galpha q (14). However, the alpha  subunits can be discriminated by certain receptors (11).

The receptor-mediated activation of PLC-beta has been studied in detail by reconstituting the m1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor, G protein, and PLC-beta in lipid vesicles (15, 16). The muscarinic agonist carbachol stimulated PLC activity 90-fold, and each member of the Gqalpha family mediated this activation. The intrinsic GTPase activity of purified Galpha q was low but was stimulated >50-fold by the presence of PLC-beta 1, that is PLC-beta 1 is a GTPase-activating protein for Galpha q (16). In the reconstituted system, PLC-beta 1 also increased the rate of GTP hydrolysis by Galpha q up to 60-fold in the presence of carbachol, which alone stimulated activity 6-10-fold (16). These results indicate that the receptor and PLC-beta 1 coordinately regulate the amplitude of the PLC signal and the rate of signal termination.

The Gbeta gamma dimer also activates PLC-beta isozymes (1-4, 15). The sensitivity of PLC-beta isozymes to Gbeta gamma subunits differs from that to Gqalpha and decreases in the order PLC-beta 3 > PLC-beta 2 > PLC-beta 1 (4, 5). The ability of Gbeta gamma subunits to activate PLC-beta 2 in response to ligation of the luteinizing hormone receptor, V2 vasopressin receptor, beta 1- and beta 2-adrenergic receptors, m2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor, and the receptors for the chemoattractants interleukin 8 (IL-8), formyl-Met-Leu-Phe, and complementation factor 5a was demonstrated using a cotransfection assay system in COS cells (4, 17, 18). These receptors also stimulate PLC-beta through Gqalpha subunits. Although the concentrations of Gbeta gamma required for maximal activation of PLC-beta isoforms in vitro are much larger than those of Gqalpha subunits, the final extents of activation are similar. Thus, both Gqalpha and Gbeta gamma likely are transducers in PLC signaling. However, it was recently suggested that Gbeta gamma is the predominant transducer in the activation of Xenopus oocyte PLC and that the role of Gqalpha subunits is to specify the receptor coupled to the enzyme (19).

The region of PLC-beta that interacts with Gqalpha differs from that responsible for interaction with Gbeta gamma ; whereas the COOH-terminal region downstream of the Y domain is essential for the activation of PLC-beta 1 and PLC-beta 2 by Gqalpha (4, 5), the site of interaction of PLC-beta 2 with Gbeta gamma was localized to the region spanning Glu435 to Val641 (20). Thus, Gqalpha and Gbeta gamma subunits may independently modulate a single PLC-beta molecule concurrently. Several positively charged residues important for interaction with Gqalpha have been identified in the COOH-terminal region of PLC-beta 1 (8). The COOH-terminal 14 residues of the Gbeta subunit were also shown to be important for PLC-beta activation (21).

Mammalian cDNAs that encode five distinct Gbeta subunits and 11 Ggamma subunits have been isolated. Although certain subunits are expressed only in specific tissues and there is some selectivity in the interaction of beta  and gamma , Gbeta gamma subunits are available in many different combinations. Among several permitted combinations tested, all except beta 1gamma 1 activated purified PLC-beta 3 with similar potencies (4, 5). In cells, however, not all the available Gqalpha members and Gbeta gamma combinations appear to be utilized to activate PLC. Experiments with antisense oligonucleotides directed against the mRNAs encoding various G protein subunits suggested that m1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor interacts only with the G protein complexes composed of the subunits alpha q, alpha 11, beta 1, beta 4, and gamma 4 to activate PLC in RBL-2H3 cells, despite the fact that the subunits alpha 14, beta 2, beta 3, gamma 2, gamma 3, gamma 5, and gamma 7 are also expressed in the cell (22).


Activation of PLC-gamma by Protein Tyrosine Kinases

Polypeptide growth factors, such as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), epidermal growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, nerve growth factor, and hepatocyte growth factor, induce PIP2 turnover by activating PLC-gamma in a wide variety of cells. Binding of these growth factors to their receptors results in activation of the intrinsic protein tyrosine kinase (PTK) activity of the receptor and the consequent tyrosine phosphorylation of numerous proteins, including the receptor itself and PLC-gamma (1-4) (Fig. 3). Receptor autophosphorylation creates high affinity binding sites for several SH2 domain-containing proteins, including PLC-gamma 1. A specific autophosphorylated site (for example, Tyr1021 of the beta -type PDGF receptor) is recognized by one of the SH2 domains of PLC-gamma . Mutation of the PLC-gamma -binding Tyr residue to Phe in the receptors for PDGF, epidermal growth factor, and nerve growth factor prevents association of the receptor with PLC-gamma and abolishes the growth factor-dependent production of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (4).


Fig. 3. Phosphorylation and activation of PLC-gamma isozymes by a receptor PTK (left), a nonreceptor PTK coupled to a multichain receptor (middle), and a nonreceptor PTK coupled to a heptahelical receptor (right). PY and YP, phosphotyrosine.
[View Larger Version of this Image (33K GIF file)]

Phosphorylation of PLC-gamma 1 by all growth factor receptors occurs at identical sites: tyrosines 771, 783, and 1254. Phe substitution at Tyr783 completely blocks the activation of PLC by PDGF in NIH 3T3 cells (1-5). Tyrosine phosphorylation of PLC-gamma 1 appears to promote its association with unidentified components of the cytoskeleton; the SH3 domain of PLC-gamma 1 is responsible for targeting the enzyme to the actin microfilament network. Whether this cytoskeletal association serves to bring the enzyme into contact with its substrate or whether it promotes interaction with another protein component essential for its activation is unknown. Autophosphorylation of growth factor receptors and subsequent tyrosine phosphorylation of substrate proteins, including PLC-gamma 1, require the presence of H2O2, whose concentration increases transiently and which appears to function as an intracellular messenger in growth factor-stimulated cells (23). This requirement probably reflects that the activation of a receptor PTK by the binding of a growth factor is insufficient to increase the steady-state level of protein tyrosine phosphorylation. Concurrent inhibition of protein tyrosine phosphatases by H2O2 is also necessary.

Nonreceptor PTKs also phosphorylate and activate PLC-gamma isozymes in response to the ligation of certain cell surface receptors. Such receptors include the T cell antigen receptor, membrane immunoglobulin (Ig) M, the high affinity IgE receptor, the IgG receptors, the IgA receptor, CD20, CD38, the alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor, integrins, and several receptors for cytokines such as ciliary neurotrophic factor, leukemia inhibitory factor, oncostatin M, IL-1, IL-4, IL-6, and IL-7 (4, 24-26). These receptors, most of which comprise multiple polypeptide chains, do not themselves possess PTK activity, but they activate a wide variety of nonreceptor PTKs such as the members of Src, Syk, and Jak/Tyk families. The activated PTKs often phosphorylate one of the receptor components to which PLC-gamma then binds via its SH2 domains and becomes phosphorylated by the PTK. PLC-gamma 1 associates directly with Src and Syk in cells, and in vitro it is phosphorylated by various soluble PTKs including Src, Fyn, Lck, Lyn, and Hck (4, 5). Tyrosine phosphorylation of PLC-gamma 1 has also been shown to be elevated in cells that express SV40 middle T antigen, that are strained mechanically, or that are exposed to electroconvulsive shock (27-29).

Tyrosine phosphorylation of PLC-gamma has also been observed in response to the ligation of several heptahelical, G protein-coupled receptors, including m5 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor in Chinese hamster ovary cells, the angiotensin II and thrombin receptors in vascular smooth muscle cells, and platelet-activating factor (4, 30, 31). Src appears to be responsible for the phosphorylation of PLC-gamma 1 in vascular smooth muscle cells and platelets; electroporation of antibodies to Src inhibited the tyrosine phosphorylation of PLC-gamma 1 elicited by angiotensin II or platelet-activating factor. Although activation of Src family PTKs in response to stimulation of a variety of G protein-coupled receptors has been demonstrated (32), the mechanism by which the enzymes are coupled to the receptors is not clear. One possible mechanism is through a member of the recently identified proline-rich PTK (Pyk) family; stimulation of receptors coupled to the G proteins Gi or Gq in neuronal cells resulted in tyrosine phosphorylation of Pyk-2, binding of the SH2 domain of Src to the phosphorylated Pyk-2, and activation of Src (33).


PTK-independent Activation of PLC-gamma

PLC-gamma isozymes can be activated directly by several lipid-derived second messengers in the absence of tyrosine phosphorylation. Phosphatidic acid produced by the action of PLD activates purified PLC-gamma 1 by acting as an allosteric modifier (34). PLC-gamma isozymes are also stimulated by arachidonic acid (AA) in the presence of the microtubule-associated protein tau (in neuronal cells) or tau-like proteins (in non-neuronal cells) (35). The effect of tau and AA was specific to PLC-gamma isozymes and was markedly inhibited by phosphatidylcholine (PC). These observations suggest that the activation of PLC-gamma 1 by tau or tau-like proteins might be facilitated by a concomitant decrease in PC concentration and an increase in AA concentration, both of which occur in cells upon activation of an 85-kDa cytosolic phospholipase A2 (cPLA2). This enzyme is coupled to various receptors and preferentially hydrolyzes PC containing AA. Therefore, activation of PLC-gamma isozymes may occur secondarily to receptor-mediated activation of cPLA2. Several studies are consistent with the notion that stimulation of PLC by endogenously released AA occurs in cells.

Ligation of a variety of receptors results in the activation of PI 3-kinase, which phosphorylates the D3 position of PIP2 to produce phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (PIP3). PIP3 activates purified PLC-gamma isozymes specifically by interacting with their SH2 domains.2 In addition, incubation of NIH 3T3 cells with PIP3 resulted in a transient increase in the intracellular Ca2+ concentration, an effect that was blocked in the presence of a PLC inhibitor. Thus, receptors coupled to PLD, cPLA2, or PI 3-kinase may activate PLC-gamma isozymes indirectly, in the absence of tyrosine phosphorylation, through the generation of lipid-derived second messengers (Fig. 4).


Fig. 4. Receptor-induced activation of PLC-gamma isozymes by tau and AA generated by cPLA2 (left), PIP3 generated by PI 3-kinase (middle), and phosphatidic acid (PA) generated by PLD (right).
[View Larger Version of this Image (30K GIF file)]


Activation of PLC-delta

Although four distinct PLC-delta isoforms are known, the mechanism by which these isozymes are coupled to membrane receptors remains unclear. A new class of GTP-binding protein, termed Gh and containing 75-80-kDa alpha  and ~50-kDa beta  subunits, has been shown to be associated with agonist-bound alpha 1-adrenergic receptors (alpha 1-AR). The Ghalpha subunit, a multifunctional protein that also possesses tissue transglutaminase activity (37), activates purified PLC-delta 1 and forms a complex with PLC-delta 1 in cells stimulated via alpha 1-AR (38). Furthermore, overexpression of Ghalpha in COS cells enhanced the activation of PLC induced by ligation of the alpha 1-AR (37). These results suggest that Ghalpha directly couples alpha 1-AR to PLC-delta 1. It is not yet known whether other PLC-delta isozymes are also activated by Ghalpha , what other receptors couple to Ghalpha , and how the tissue transglutaminase activity of Ghalpha is related to its PLC-delta 1-activating function. The GTPase-activating protein for the small GTP-binding protein RhoA (RhoGAP) also activates purified PLC-delta 1; PLC-delta 1 activation was thus suggested to occur downstream of RhoA activation (39).

All PLC isozymes are activated by Ca2+ in vitro, but PLC-delta isozymes are more sensitive to Ca2+ compared with the other isozymes. Furthermore, PLC-delta can be tethered to PIP2-containing membranes via its PH domian in the absence of other signals. An increase in the intracellular concentration of Ca2+ to a level sufficient to fix the C2 domain of PLC-delta might therefore trigger its activation. Thus, activation of PLC-delta isozymes might occur secondarily to receptor-mediated activation of other PLC isozymes or Ca2+ channels.


Nuclear PLC

PLC signaling also appears to occur in the nucleus (40). PLC-beta 1 is the major PLC isoform that has been detected in the nucleus of various cells. The amount of nuclear PLC-beta 1 protein, which appears to be activated independently of its plasma membrane counterpart by an unknown mechanism, increases during cell growth and decreases during differentiation (41-44). The changes in the amount of nuclear PLC-beta 1 correlate with changes in the amount of PIP2 hydrolyzed in the nucleus. Studies of cells lacking PLC-beta 1 as a result of gene ablation revealed that it is essential for the onset of DNA synthesis in response to insulin-like growth factor I (45). The COOH-terminal region downstream of the Y domain was also shown to be necessary for translocation of PLC-beta 1 to the nucleus (8).


Inhibition of PLC via Protein Kinases A and C

The activation of PKC or cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) attenuates the PLC signaling pathway in a variety of cells. The proposed targets for phosphorylation by these kinases include cell surface receptors, G proteins, and PLC itself. PLC-beta 1 is rapidly phosphorylated in cells treated with phorbol ester and is phosphorylated at Ser887 by PKC in vitro; however, phosphorylation had no effect on either the basal or Gqalpha -stimulated activities of PLC-beta 1 (1). In human Jurkat T cells, activation of PKA or PKC results in an increase in phosphorylation of Ser1248 and a concomitant decrease in the tyrosine phosphorylation of PLC-gamma 1, the latter of which might be responsible for the decreased PLC activity apparent in Jurkat cells treated with PKA- or PKC-stimulating agonists (1).

The interaction of PLC and PKA was studied in COS cells transfected with cDNAs encoding PLC-beta 2, G protein subunits, and PKA (46). Expression of the catalytic subunit of PKA specifically inhibited Gbeta gamma stimulation of PLC-beta 2 activity, without affecting Galpha q-induced activation. The effect of PKA was not mimicked by PKC isozymes. Furthermore, PKA directly phosphorylated serine residues of PLC-beta 2 both in vivo and in vitro.


Genetic Mapping and Disruption of PLC Genes and the Relation of PLC to Human Disease

The delta -type PLC, which is the only known PLC in yeast and slime mold, has been disrupted in these lower eukaryotes by gene targeting (47, 48). Both mutants were viable. Whereas the yeast mutant showed increased sensitivity to various stresses, the slime mold mutant appeared normal, including with regard to such phenotypic aspects as growth, development, and chemotaxis. Chromosome positions for 10 mouse PLC genes and 8 human homologs were determined (49). The genes encoding PLC-beta 1, PLC-beta 4, and PLC-gamma 1 have been targeted in mouse. The homozygous mutants for PLC-beta 1 or PLC-beta 4 are born normal but subsequently manifest postnatal dwarfism; the PLC-beta 4 mutants also show a defect in motor coordination and aberrant cerebellar development.3 The PLC-gamma 1 mutation was lethal at early mid-gestation (around embryonic day 9) (36). Finally, platelets from a patient with a mild inherited bleeding disorder as well as abnormal platelet aggregation and secretion were shown to have one-third the amount of PLC-beta 2 compared with normal platelets (50).


FOOTNOTES

*   This minireview will be reprinted in the 1997 Minireview Compendium, which will be available in December, 1997. This is the first article of six in "A Thematic Series on Phospholipases."
Dagger    To whom correspondence should be addressed: Bldg. 3, Rm. 122, 3 Center Dr. MSC 0320, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-0320. Tel.: 301-496-9646; Fax: 301-480-0357.
1   The abbreviations used are: PIP2, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate; PLC, phospholipase C; PKC, protein kinase C; PLD, phospholipase D; PI 3-kinase, phosphoinositide 3-kinase; PH, pleckstrin homology; SH, Src homology; GTPgamma S, guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate; IL, interleukin; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; PTK, protein tyrosine kinase; AA, arachidonic acid; PC, phosphatidylcholine; cPLA2, cytosolic phospholipase A2; PIP3, phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate; alpha 1-AR, alpha 1-adrenergic receptor(s); PKA, cAMP-dependent protein kinase.
2   Y. S. Bae, L. G. Cantley, C.-S. Chen, S.-R. Kim, K.-S. Kwon, and S. G. Rhee, submitted for publication.
3   K. S. Jun, D. Kim, N.-G. Kang, D. S. Min, S. B. Lee, S. H. Ryu, P.-G. Suh, and H.-S. Shin, personal communication.

REFERENCES

  1. Rhee, S. G., and Choi, K. D. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 12393-12396 [Free Full Text]
  2. Cockcroft, S., and Thomas, G. M. H. (1992) Biochem. J. 288, 1-14 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Berridge, M. J. (1993) Nature 361, 315-325 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Noh, D.-Y., Shin, S. H., and Rhee, S. G. (1995) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1242, 99-114 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Lee, S. B., and Rhee, S. G. (1995) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7, 183-189 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Essen, L.-O., Perisic, O., Cheung, R., Katan, M., and Williams, R. L. (1996) Nature 380, 595-602 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Smith, M. R., Liu, Y.-L., Matthews, N. T., Rhee, S. G., Sung, W. K., and Kung, H.-F. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 6554-6558 [Abstract]
  8. Kim, C. G., Park, D., and Rhee, S. G. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 21187-21192 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Smith, M. R., Liu, Y.-L., Kim, S. R., Bae, Y. S., Kim, C. G., Kwon, K.-S., Rhee, S. G., and Kung, H.-F. (1996) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 222, 186-193 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Sternweis, P. C., and Smrcka, A. V. (1992) Trends Biochem. Sci. 17, 502-506 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Kuang, Y., Wu, Y., Jiang, H., and Wu, D. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 3975-3978 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Lee, C. W., Lee, K. H., Lee, S. B., Park, D., and Rhee, S. G. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 25335-25338 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Hepler, J. R., Biddlecome, G. H., Kleuss, C., Camp, L. A., Hofmann, S. L., Ross, E. M., and Gilman, A. G. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 496-504 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Kozasa, T., Hepler, J. R., Smrcka, A. V., Simon, M. I., Rhee, S. G., Sternweis, P. C., and Gilman, A. G. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 9176-9180 [Abstract]
  15. Nakamura, F., Kato, M., Kameyama, K., Nakada, T., Haga, T., Kato, H., Takenawa, T., and Kikkawa, U. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 6246-6253 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Biddlecome, G. H., Bernstein, G., and Ross, E. M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 7999-8007 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Zhu, X., and Birnbaumer, L. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 2827-2831 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Jiang, H., Kuang, Y., Wu, Y., Smrcka, A., Simon, M. I., and Wu, D. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 13430-13434 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Stehno-Bittel, L., Krapivinsky, G., Krapivinsky, L., Perez-Terzic, C., and Clapham, D. E. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 30068-30074 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Kuang, Y., Wu, Y., Smrcka, A., Jiang, H., and Wu, D. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 2964-2968 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Zhang, S., Coso, O. A., Collins, R., Gutkind, J. S., and Simonds, W. F. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 20208-20212 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Dippel, E., Kalkbrenner, F., Wittig, B., and Schultz, G. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 1391-1396 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Bae, Y. S., Kang, S. W., Seo, M. S., Baines, I. C., Tekle, E., Chock, P. B., and Rhee, S. G. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 217-221 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Keely, P. J., and Parise, L. V. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 26668-26676 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Gómez-Guerrero, C., Duque, N., and Egido, J. (1996) J. Immunol. 156, 4369-4376 [Abstract]
  26. Misra, U. K., Gawdi, G., and Pizzo, S. V. (1995) Biochem. J. 309, 151-158 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Su, W., Liu, W., Schaffhause, B. S., and Roberts, T. M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 12331-12334 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Liu, M., Qin, Y., Liu, J., Tanswell, A. K., and Post, M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 7066-7071 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Lee, Y. H., Ryu, S. H., Suh, P. G., Park, J. B., Ahn, Y. M., and Kim, Y. S. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 194, 665-670 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Marrero, M. B., Schieffer, B., Paxton, W. G., Schieffer, E., and Bernstein, K. E. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 15734-15738 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Rao, G. N., Delafontaine, P., and Runge, M. S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 27871-27875 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Sadoshima, J., and Izumo, S. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 775-787 [Abstract]
  33. Dikic, I., Tokiwa, G., Lev, S., Courtneidge, S. A., and Schlessinger, J. (1996) Nature 383, 547-550 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Jones, G. A., and Carpenter, G. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 20845-20850 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Hwang, S. C., Jhon, D.-Y., Bae, Y. S., Kim, J. H., and Rhee, S. G. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 18342-18349 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Ji, Q.-S., Winnier, G. E., Niswender, K. D., Horstman, D., Wisdom, R., Magnuson, M. A., and Carpenter, G. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 2999-3003 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Nakaoka, H., Perez, D. M., Baek, K. J., Das, T., Husai, A., Misono, K., Im, M.-J., and Graham, R. M. (1994) Science 264, 1593-1596 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Feng, J.-F., Rhee, S. G., and Im, M.-J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 16451-16454 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Homma, Y., and Emori, Y. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 286-291 [Abstract]
  40. Divecha, N., and Irvine, R. F. (1995) Cell 80, 269-278 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Martelli, A. M., Gilmour, R. S., Bertagnolo, V., Neri, L. M., Manzoli, L., and Cocco, L. (1992) Nature 358, 242-244 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. York, J. D., and Majerus, P. W. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 7847-7850 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Marmiroli, S., Ognibene, A., Bavelloni, A., Cinti, C., Cocco, L., and Maraldi, N. M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 13-16 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Divecha, N., Letcher, A. J., Banfic, H. H., Rhee, S. G., and Irvine, R. F. (1995) Biochem. J. 312, 63-67 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Manzoli, L., Billi, A. M., Rubbini, S., Bavelloni, A., Gilmour, R. S., Rhee, S. G., and Cocco, L. (1997) Cancer Res., in press
  46. Liu, M., and Simon, M. I. (1996) Nature 382, 83-87 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Flick, J. S., and Thorner, J. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 5861-5876 [Abstract]
  48. Drayer, A. L., Van der Kay, J., Mayr, G. W., and Van Haaster, P. J. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 1601-1609 [Abstract]
  49. Lyu, M. S., Park, D. J., Rhee, S. G., and Kozak, C. A. (1996) Mamm. Genome 7, 501-504 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Lee, S. B., Rao, A. K., Lee, K.-H., Yang, X., Bae, Y. S., and Rhee, S. G. (1996) Blood 88, 1684-1691 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.