(Received for publication, October 3, 1996, and in revised form, November 27, 1996)
From the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokushima, Shomachi, Tokushima 770, Japan
Mammalian H+-ATP synthase is a
supramolecule composed of at least 14 subunits that have a constant
stoichiometry. Nevertheless the coordinate regulation of the gene
expressions of various subunits remains obscure. To clarify the
coordinate transcriptional regulatory system of mammalian
H+-ATP synthase, we determined the absolute amount of nine
species of mRNAs for eight nuclear-encoded subunits of
H+-ATP synthase in different tissues of 8-week-old rats by
use of the synthetic mRNAs and 32P-labeled DNA probes
for each mRNA. Our quantitative analyses of the transcripts of
H+-ATP synthase revealed that nine species of the subunits
in different tissues of 8-week-old rats were divisible into two groups:
a high transcript gene (HTG) group (-subunit, subunit b, subunit d, subunit e, and Factor 6) and a low transcript gene (LTG) group (subunit
c(P1), subunit c(P2), IF1, and oligomycin sensitivity-conferring protein). The transcription step of LTG could constitute a bottleneck in the biogenesis of H+-ATP synthase. Thus, the
transcriptional regulatory system of the LTG may play a key role in the
biogenesis of mammalian H+-ATP synthase. The HTG were
transcribed in a tissue-specific manner that corresponds with energy
demand in the tissues. However, there was no tissue specificity in
subunit c(P2). Furthermore, the tissue specificity of the transcript of
IF1 differed substantially from that of HTG, suggesting that it could
be crucial in the protection of mitochondrial membrane under abnormal
conditions.
The regulation of the biosynthesis and assembly of multisubunit mitochondrial enzyme complexes is still obscure, especially when a concerted regulation of the expression of genes encoded by both nuclear and mitochondrial genomes is to be expected (1-4). Of particular interest is the biogenesis of H+-ATP synthase, which is the key enzyme in oxidative phosphorylation and thus is responsible for the production of most of the ATP in mammalian organisms.
The mammalian H+-ATP synthase is a supramolecule composed
of at least 14 subunits (5-9) that have a constant stoichiometry (10,
11), 6 of which construct the catalytic site of ATP synthesis called
F1 (subunits ,
,
,
, and
and the loosely
attached ATPase inhibitor protein IF1) and 8 of which construct an
energy transduction part called Fo (subunits a, b, c, d, e,
F6, OSCP,1 and A6L). The
additional subunits f and g were also reported in bovine heart
H+-ATP synthase (6). Two subunits of the Fo
(subunit a and A6L) are encoded by mitochondrial genome, and all the
other subunits are separately encoded by nuclear chromosomes (12), but
it is still unknown how the gene expression of each subunit is
coordinately regulated.
To clarify the coordinate transcriptional regulatory system(s) of the mammalian H+-ATP synthase, we have developed a simple and rapid purification method of H+-ATP synthase from rat (8, 9) that can carry out the physiological experiments. We then determined the primary sequences of the synthase subunits by the protein sequence and cDNA cloning techniques (13-17).
We report here the absolute amount of nine species of mRNAs for eight nuclear-encoded subunits of H+-ATP synthase in different tissues of 8-week-old rats, which we determined using the mRNAs synthesized by an in vitro transcriptional system and applying 32P-labeled DNA probes to each. This is the first demonstration of the absolute amount of the mRNAs of multisubunits of H+-ATP synthase in different mammalian tissues.
Eight-week-old male Wistar strain rats were obtained from the Shizuoka Laboratory Animal Center (Shizuoka, Japan). The rats were decapitated, and tissues of the brain, liver, heart, kidney, and muscle were rapidly removed. The poly(A)+ RNA was isolated from the tissues by the BioMag mRNA purification kit (Japan PerSeptive Biosystems Ltd., Tokyo) as described in the manual and in Refs. 18 and 19 with the exception that the poly(A)+ RNA eluted from the BioMag Oligo(dT)20 with 50 µl of DEPC water was further purified as follows: RNase inhibitor (62.5 units, 2.5 µl) and RNase-free DNase I (2.5 units, 2.5 µl) were added to the obtained poly(A)+ RNA solution (50 µl) and then incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. DEPC water was prepared by adding DEPC to deionized water (Milli-Q) at 0.2% (w/v), stirring vigorously for 12 h, and then autoclaving for 30 min. DEPC water (55 µl) and 100 µl of a mixture of phenol, chloroform, and isoamyl alcohol (50:48:2) were further added to the poly(A)+ RNA solution, which was then treated with a Vortex mixer and centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 5 min. Sodium acetate (3.6 µl of 3 M), 1 µl of Ethanchinmate (Nippon Gene Ltd., Tokyo), and 2.5 volumes of ethanol were mixed into the obtained supernatant, which was again centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded, and 500 µl of 70% ethanol was added and centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 3 min at 4 °C. The obtained pellet (the purified poly(A)+ RNA) was dried and then solubilized with 50 µl of DEPC water.
Preparation of 32P-Labeled Probe DNAsAs shown
in Fig. 1, the probes used were a
XhoI-BglII fragment of cDNA for subunit b
(13), an AccI-AvaII fragment of cDNA for
subunit d (17), a HindIII-HindIII fragment of
cDNA for subunit e (15), a HindIII-ApaLI
fragment of cDNA for OSCP (16), a HindIII-ApaLI fragment of cDNA for IF1 (16),
a HindIII-HindIII fragment of cDNA for
F6 (14), a XhoI-EcoRI fragment of
cDNA for subunit c(P1) (16), and an
AccI-EcoO1091 fragment of cDNA for subunit
c(P2) (16). The probe for -subunit mRNA was a fragment of
634-925 bp of
-subunit cDNA (21) that was synthesized by a
nested reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction method using
four primers (outer primers: 5
-ATAAGGTTGTGGATCTGCTGGCC-3
and
5
-AACTCAGCAATAGCACGGGACAGCA-3
; inner primers:
5
-GGGATATCGCGTTGGTATATGGGCAGATGA-3
and
5
-GGGCGGCCGCACATAGATAGCCTGCACTGAG-3
).
The primers' design was carried out by Genetyx-Mac (Version 7.0, Software Development Co., Tokyo). The obtained DNA was a fragment of
634-925 bp of -subunit cDNA, which was confirmed by sequence
analysis using the dye primer method in a Pharmacia Biotech Inc.
Automated Laser Fluorescent DNA sequencer.
A fragment of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase cDNA was
obtained from Clontech (catalog no. 9805). The probe DNAs were labeled
by the random-prime DNA labeling method (22), using [-32P]dCTP.
The
mRNAs of H+-ATP synthase subunits were synthesized by
the MAXIscript In Vitro Transcription Kit (Ambion, catalog
no. 1318) as described in the manual. Phagemid expression vector
(Bluescript KS M13+ (Stratagene)), which contains one of
the cDNAs of the H+-ATP synthase subunits b, c(P1),
c(P2), d, e, Factor 6, OSCP, or -subunit (634-925 bp), was
linearized by cutting with NotI. The mRNAs of these
subunits were synthesized at 37 °C for 1 h by adding 25 units
of triiodothyronine RNA polymerase and for 1 h more by further
addition of the enzyme. The obtained mRNAs (50 µl) were incubated
at 37 °C for 1 h by addition of 2.5 µl of RNase inhibitor (25 units/µl) and 2.5 µl of RNase-free DNase I (2 units/µl). After
adding 55 µl of DEPC water, the phenolchloroform extraction was
carried out once. 3.6 µl of 3 M sodium acetate, 1 µl of
Ethachinmate (Nippon Gene Ltd., Tokyo), and 2.5 volumes of ethanol were
then added, mixed thoroughly with a Vortex mixer, and centrifuged at
10,000 × g for 3 min. The resulting supernatant was
discarded, 70% ethanol was added, and the tube was centrifuged at
10,000 × g for 3 min. The supernatant was again
discarded, and the pellet was dried in a centrifugation concentrator.
The obtained pellet was dissolved in 50 µl of DEPC water. The amount of mRNA was determined from the absorbance at 260 nm (one unit of
absorbance at 260 nm = 40 µg/ml). In order to calculate the molecular mass of the synthetic mRNAs accurately, we determined the
length of each cDNA poly(A) tail by dye primer method in a Pharmacia Automated Laser Fluorescent DNA sequencer. The lengths (bases) of the poly(A) tails of cDNAs were as follows: subunit b,
15; subunit c(P1), 25; subunit c(P2), 78; subunit d, 15; subunit e, 88;
Factor 6, 69; OSCP, 25; IF1, 19. Molecular masses of sodium salt of
synthetic mRNAs were calculated from the equation, molecular mass = A × 351.2 + G × 367.2 + C × 327.2 + U × 328.2 + 40, where A, G, C, and U are numbers of molecules of
adenine, guanine, cytosine, and uracil in synthetic mRNA,
respectively. The molecular masses of synthetic mRNAs of
H+-ATP synthase subunits were as follows:
-subunit
(634-925 bp), 117,167; subunit b, 414,261; subunit c(P1), 223,622;
subunit c(P2), 252,760; subunit d, 228,413; subunit e, 157,263; Factor
6, 274,539; IF1, 195,624; OSCP, 274,539.
For the dot-blotting assay of mRNA, the synthetic mRNAs and poly(A)+ RNA were denatured in 106.7 µl of 20 mM MOPS buffer (pH 7.0) containing 6% formaldehyde, 50% deionized formamide, 5 mM sodium acetate, and 1 mM EDTA at 65 °C for 5 min, cooled in ice water, and then diluted by adding 106.7 µl of 20 × SSPE cooled on ice. The RNA solutions (213.4 µl) of the synthetic mRNAs containing 20-600 pg of poly(A)+ RNA (200 ng) purified from the various rat tissues were blotted on the Hybond-N nylon membranes (presoaked in 10 × SSPE solution) using the Bio-Dot Slot Format blotting apparatus (Bio-Rad). The resulting nylon membranes were laid RNA side up on Whatman No. 3MM paper previously dampened with 0.05 N NaOH solution for 5 min, rinsed with 2 × SSPE, blotted with 3MM paper, dried at 80 °C for 10 min, and then cross-linked by a Funakoshi UV Linker, model FS-1500.
Before hybridization, the nylon membrane was prehybridized in 50% formamide, 5 × SSPE (0.75 M NaCl, 50 mM NaH2PO4, and 5 mM EDTA at pH 7.4), 200 µg/ml sonicated salmon sperm DNA, 0.5% SDS, and 5 × Denhardt's solution at 42 °C for 5 h. Hybridization was performed at 42 °C for 14 h in the same solution containing 10% dextran sulfate and labeled probe DNA (5 × 105 cpm/ml). After hybridization, the nylon membrane was washed four times with 2 × SSPE containing 0.1% SDS for 15 min at 42 °C and then with 1 × SSPE containing 0.1% SDS for 30 min at 42 °C. The membrane was left with a Fuji imaging plate in the cassette at room temperature for 6 h and then scanned and analyzed by a bioimaging analyzer (BAS1500Mac, Fuji Film Co., Tokyo).
The amounts of 9 species of mRNAs for 8 subunits of rat H+-ATP synthase were determined by dot blot
analysis of each synthetic mRNA and of poly(A)+ RNAs
purified from rat brain, liver, heart, kidney, and muscle. Each
synthetic mRNA was transcribed from NotI-linearized
pBluescript IIKS+, which inserted cDNA from the
H+-ATP synthase subunit into its
EcoRV-NotI site, using triiodothyronine phage RNA
polymerase as described under "Experimental Procedures." The
lengths of all synthetic mRNAs were the same as those of the corresponding H+-ATP synthase subunit cDNAs and a
fragment of -subunit cDNA (634-925 bp), as confirmed by agarose
gel electrophoresis (Fig. 2).
Fig. 3 shows radio signals of dot blots of the nine
species of synthetic mRNAs and poly(A)+ RNAs purified
from different tissues of 8-week-old rats that were detected with each
corresponding [32P]DNA probe. The probe DNAs for subunit
c(P1) and c(P2) specifically hybridized with the synthetic mRNAs of
subunit c(P1) and c(P2), respectively. There was no cross-reaction
between them.
Linear relationships were derived between the strength of radio signals
analyzed by a Fuji Film bioimaging analyzer, model BAS1500Mac, and the
dotted amount of each synthetic mRNA (cf. an example of
Factor 6 in Fig. 4). From these dose-response curves, the molar number of mRNA in 200 ng of poly(A)+ RNAs
purified from the rat tissues was determined for each subunit of
H+-ATP synthase (Fig. 5).
As these data make clear, the nine subunits of H+-ATP
synthase in various tissues of 8-week-old rat were classified into the following two groups: a high transcript gene group and a low transcript gene group (Fig. 5). The high transcript gene (HTG) group consisted of
-subunit, subunit b, subunit d, subunit e, and Factor 6, and the low
transcript gene (LTG) group included subunit c(P1), subunit c(P2), IF1,
and OSCP.
The HTG were transcribed in a tissue-specific manner. The expression levels of mRNAs in the HTG in each tissue were nearly identical (Fig. 5). Therefore, the transcription of the HTG could be regulated by a common transcriptional regulatory system. This is in good accord with previous findings (23-28) in which the regulation of the expression of nuclear-encoded proteins involved in mitochondrial energy metabolism has been described mostly at the transcriptional level.
Although the steady-state levels of the transcripts of subunit c(P1), c(P2), IF1, and OSCP were very much lower than those of the HTG, they were of the same order. Thus, the LTG could also be regulated by an additional common transcriptional regulatory system that differs from that in the HTG. Subunit c(P1) and OSCP were also transcribed in a tissue-specific manner, but there was no tissue specificity in the transcriptional level of subunit c(P2) in the different tissues. Subunit c(P1) and subunit c(P2) are isomers composed of different signal peptides and the same mature protein that were found in bovine (29), rat (16), and human (30). Furthermore, the transcriptional level of IF1 in the rat tissues differed substantially from those of the other subunits according to the following hierarchy: brain > kidney > heart > muscle > liver.
Our quantitative analyses of the transcripts of H+-ATP
synthase subunits revealed that nine species of the subunits of
H+-ATP synthase in different tissues of 8-week-old rats
were clearly divisible into the following two groups: a high transcript
gene (HTG) group (-subunit, subunit b, subunit d, subunit e, and
Factor 6) and a low transcript gene (LTG) group (subunit c(P1), subunit c(P2), IF1, and OSCP). The transcription step of LTG could constitute a
bottleneck in the biogenesis of H+-ATP synthase. Thus, the
transcriptional regulatory system of the LTG may play a key role in the
biogenesis of mammalian H+-ATP synthase. Such a hypothesis
would be in good accord with previous findings (31). Nevertheless
further studies examining the decay step of the transcripts (32) as
well as the real rate of the transcription in the nucleus will be
required to confirm this.
A possible reason for the differential gene expression could be to prevent formation of proton leaks during an assembly of H+-ATP synthase, which has been examined in detail in prokaryotes (33-35).
The tissue specificity of the transcripts of HTG may correspond with energy demand in the tissues, but the tissue specificity of the transcript of IF1 differed substantially from those of HTG. Because IF1 reversibly binds to F1 and inhibits ATP hydrolysis to prevent ATP loss in the tissues under ischemia, anoxia, and other energy-deficient conditions (36), it seems likely that IF1 serves to protect mitochondrial membrane under conditions of energy deficiency. Thus, the tissue specificity of IF1 could be crucial in the protection of mitochondrial membrane under abnormal conditions.
We thank Kayoko Morokami for experimental assistance. We also thank Dr. Phillip Nagley of Monash University for helpful discussion.