(Received for publication, July 24, 1996, and in revised form, September 19, 1996)
From the Department of Molecular Physiology and
Biophysics and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Vanderbilt University
School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37232 and § Onyx
Pharmaceuticals, Richmond, California 94806
Treatment of fibroblasts with growth factors results in activation of phospholipase D (PLD). In order to determine the role of the Rho family of small GTPases in growth factor-mediated PLD activation, we used cells transfected with wild type and mutant Rac1. In response to epidermal growth factor (EGF), PLD activity was greatly increased in Rat1 fibroblasts expressing wild type Rac1 (wtRac1), and completely abrogated in cells expressing dominant negative N17Rac1, consistent with Rac1 mediating the action of this growth factor. In contrast, in cells treated with platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) or phorbol ester, the wtRac1 cells showed little or no enhancement of PLD activity, and the response was not affected in the N17Rac1 cells, implying that Rac1 played a minimal role in the activation of PLD by PDGF or protein kinase C. Both growth factors produced an attenuated PLD response in cells expressing constitutively active V12Rac1, but these cells showed other changes, including altered morphology, increased basal PLD, and decreased growth factor receptor autophosphorylation. The effects of EGF and PDGF on phosphoinositide phospholipase C activity were not enhanced in cells expressing wtRac1 or inhibited in those expressing N17Rac1. In cells expressing constitutively active V12Rac1, basal phosphoinositide phospholipase C was elevated, but there were no significant effects of EGF or PDGF. We used C3 transferase of Clostridium botulinum, which ADP-ribosylates and inactivates RhoA, to investigate the involvement of RhoA in the activation of PLD by PDGF. Cells expressing wtRac1 and N17Rac1 showed a decreased PLD in response to PDGF when treated with C3 transferase, indicating a role for RhoA. In summary, these data indicate a major role for Rac1 in the activation of PLD by EGF, but not PDGF or protein kinase C.
Phospholipase D (PLD)1 is the enzyme responsible for the hydrolysis of phosphatidylcholine, which leads to the generation of choline and phosphatidic acid (1, 2). Phosphatidic acid can be further hydrolyzed by phospholipase A2 to form the purported second messenger lysophosphatidic acid, or it can be hydrolyzed by phosphatidate phosphohydrolase to form 1,2-diacylglycerol (3). It has been suggested that the hydrolysis of phosphatidylcholine by PLD, and the subsequent action of phosphatidate phosphohydrolase on phosphatidic acid, are responsible for the long term increase in diacylglycerol in cells stimulated by growth factors (4). This diacylglycerol can activate Ca2+-independent isoforms of protein kinase C (PKC) (5). In fibroblasts, the activity of PLD can be increased to different extents by platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) (6-8). In some cases, this increase is dependent on PKC, since down-regulation of PKC or treatment of the cells with PKC inhibitors leads to an inhibition of growth factor-stimulated PLD activity (6-8). However, there are reports that PKC is not required for PLD activation, suggesting an alternate pathway(s) (9, 10).
Earlier reports showing that GTPS activated PLD in membranes or
permeabilized cells suggested the involvement of G proteins (11-14).
Subsequent reports have shown that members of the Rho and ARF families
of GTPases activate PLD (15-18). The Rho family of GTPases includes
RhoA and Rac1. These proteins show 58% homology and are involved in
alterations of the cytoskeleton (19, 20). In membranes from rat liver,
neutrophils, and HL60 cells, recombinant RhoA stimulates PLD activity
in the presence of GTP
S (15, 18, 21, 22). It has also been reported
that treatment of Rat1 fibroblasts with C3 transferase from
Clostridium botulinum, which ADP-ribosylates and inactivates
Rho, results in decreased activation of PLD in response to
lysophosphatidic acid and endothelin-1 (23).
In order to test whether Rac1 also played a role in the pathway leading to PLD activation, we used Rat1 fibroblasts stably expressing wild type Rac1 (wtRac1), the dominant negative form of Rac1 (N17Rac1), and the constitutively active form of Rac1 (V12Rac1) (24). The results indicate that Rac1 plays a major role in the activation of PLD by EGF, but not PDGF.
EGF (mouse receptor grade) was from Upstate Biotechnology Inc. (UBI), PDGF B/B (human recombinant) from Boehringer Mannheim, and 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) from Sigma. C3 exoenzyme from C. botulinum was purchased from List Biologicals. Phosphatidylbutanol standard was from Avanti Polar Lipids. [9,10-3H]Myristate and myo-[2-3H]inositol were from DuPont NEN. Antibodies to the EGF receptor (sheep anti-human) were from UBI, antibodies to the PDGF receptor were from Oncogene Science, and those to Tyr(P) (PY20) were from ICN.
Expression of Rac Proteins in Rat1 FibroblastsRat1 fibroblasts expressing Rac proteins are described elsewhere (24). Briefly, a plasmid expressing the tetracycline-sensitive transactivator was co-transfected with a neomycin resistance plasmid into Rat1 fibroblasts. Cells which showed repression to tetracycline were selected and co-transfected with Myc-tagged wtRac1, V12Rac1, N17Rac1, or empty vector controlled by a hybrid element containing several tet operators and a cytomegalovirus minimal promoter, along with a puromycin resistance plasmid. The presence of endogenous or expressed Rac proteins was confirmed with Western blotting using an anti-Myc antibody (M. Symons, Onyx Pharmaceuticals) or an anti Rac1 antibody (C-14, Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
Cell CultureRat1 fibroblasts were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagles' medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 0.4 mg/ml G418, 1.2 µg/ml puromycin, and the cells transfected with wtRac1 or mutant Rac1 were grown in the presence of 2 µg/ml tetracycline. The cells were grown at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. Tetracycline was removed from the cells 48 h prior to experimentation. All experiments were performed when cells were 70-80% confluent, with great care being taken to assure equal confluence between the different cell lines.
Phospholipase D AssayCells were plated in 100-mm tissue-culture plates or six-well plates. The cells were serum-starved in DMEM supplemented with 0.4 mg/ml puromycin and 0.5% fatty acid-free bovine serum albumin for 24 h before the start of the assay. For the final 16 h of serum starvation, the cells were labeled with 1 µCi/ml [9,10-3H]myristic acid. At the start of the experiment, the cells were washed three times with 5 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and pre-equilibrated at 37 °C in serum-free DMEM for 1 h. For the final 10 min of preincubation, 0.3% butan-1-ol was included. At the end of the preincubation, cells were treated with the indicated growth factor for 15 min. Incubations were terminated by removing the medium, washing once with 5 ml of ice-cold PBS, and adding ice-cold methanol. Cells were scraped off the plates, and the lipids extracted and separated with methanol/chloroform/0.1 N HCl (1:1:1) according to the method of Bligh and Dyer (25). The lower phase was dried under N2, resuspended in 30 µl of chloroform/methanol (2:1), and spotted onto silica gel 60A thin layer chromatography plates (Whatman). The plates were developed in the upper phase of the solvent system of ethyl acetate/iso-octane/H2O/acetic acid (55:25:50:10) and then stained with iodine. A phosphatidylbutanol standard was used to locate the bands, which were scraped into scintillation vials containing 500 µl of methanol and 7.5 ml of Ready Organic scintillation mixture (Bio-Rad). Radioactivity incorporated into total phospholipids was measured for each cell line, and used to normalize the results to the vector cells.
Measurement of Total Inositol PhosphatesInositol phosphates were measured as described by Yeo and Exton (6). Briefly, cells were plated on six-well tissue culture plates. The cells were labeled with 1 µCi/ml myo-[2-3H]inositol in inositol-free, serum-free DMEM supplemented with 0.5% bovine serum albumin for 18 h prior to the experiment. At the start of the experiment, the cells were washed three times with 5 ml of PBS and resuspended in 3 ml of inositol-free, serum-free DMEM. The cells were preincubated for 1 h at 37 °C. During the last 10 min of preincubation, 20 mM LiCl was included. The cells were treated with the indicated growth factor for 15 min. The experiment was terminated by removing the medium, washing with 5 ml of PBS, and adding 750 µl of ice-cold 20 mM formic acid. The cells were incubated on ice for 30 min before they were neutralized with the addition of 250 µl of 50 mM NH4OH. The cells were scraped on ice, transferred to a 1.5-ml Eppendorf tube, and spun at maximum speed for 10 min at 4 °C. Eight hundred µl of the supernatant was loaded onto columns containing 1 ml of AG1-8X resin. Inositol-containing compounds were eluted according to Simpson et al. (26). The free inositol (Ins) was eluted three times with 3 ml of H2O. The glycerophosphoinositol fraction was eluted with three times with 3 ml of 60 mM ammonium formate, 5 mM sodium tetraborate, and the inositol phosphate (InsPx) fraction was eluted with once with 6 ml of 1 M ammonium formate, 0.1 M formic acid. Five hundred µl of each fraction was counted in 15 ml of Ready Safe (Bio-Rad). The results are expressed as {(InsPx)/(InsPx + Ins)} × 1000.
Scrape-loading of C3 TransferaseCells were scrape-loaded according to the method of Malcolm et al. (23). Briefly, cells were grown to confluence on 100-mm tissue culture dishes. The cells were scraped in 500 µl of scrape-loading buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2, 114 mM KCl, 25 mM NaCl, 5.5 mM MgCl2), either alone or in the presence of 5 µg/ml C3 transferase, using a rubber policeman. The cells were then aliquoted equally onto a six-well plate and allowed to grow overnight. The cells were then serum-starved for 18 h, and 1 µCi/ml [3H]myristate was added for the final 15 h. At the end of this incubation, PLD was assayed.
EGF Receptor and PDGF Receptor AutophosphorylationSub-confluent cells grown on 100-mm tissue culture plates were serum-starved overnight, then treated with 50 nM EGF, 25 ng/ml PDGF, or vehicle (serum-free medium) for 5 min at 37 °C. At the end of this incubation, the cells were lysed in 400 µl of RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml pepstatin, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM NaF) by rocking the plates at 4 °C for 15 min. The cells were scraped into Eppendorf tubes on ice, and the tubes spun at 14,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was precleared with 10 µl of Protein A/G-Sepharose for 1 h at 4 °C, and a protein assay performed on the cleared supernatant. Five hundred µg of protein at a concentration of 1 mg/ml was immmunoprecipitated overnight at 4 °C with 4 µg of anti-human EGF receptor antibody (UBI) or 1 µg of anti-mouse PDGF receptor antibody (Oncogene Science). The EGFR was collected with 2 µg of goat anti-sheep antibody and 20 µl of Protein A/G-Sepharose, while the PDGFR was collected with 50 µl of Protein A-Sepharose beads (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.). The beads washed three times with 0.4 ml of ice-cold RIPA buffer. The EGFR was eluted from the beads with 20 µl of 2 × SDS sample buffer (Pharmacia), the PDGFR was eluted with 20 µl of 4 × SDS sample buffer, and the proteins separated by SDS-PAGE on a 6% Novex gel. The proteins were transferred to Immobilon P, and the phosphorylation level of the immunoprecipitated EGFR and PDGFR was determined by probing the blot with PY20 antibody.
Western Blotting of EGF ReceptorSubconfluent cells on a
six-well plate were washed once with 5 ml of PBS and scraped in 200 µl of 1 × SDS sample buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH
6.8, 2% SDS, 0.0025% bromphenol blue, 10% glycerol, 2.5%
-mercaptoethanol). Protein concentrations were then determined by
bicinchoninic acid (BCA) (Pierce). Equal concentrations of cellular
protein (2.5 µg) were separated by SDS-PAGE on a 6% gel, transferred
to Immobilon-P, blocked in 1% bovine serum albumin, and probed with
the antibody EGFR-1005 (Santa Cruz). The blot was developed using ECL
(Amersham).
In order to investigate a role for
Rac1 in the growth factor-induced PLD activity, we treated Rat1
fibroblasts expressing wild type or mutant forms of Rac1 with EGF.
Western blotting showed that these forms of Rac1 were increased
5-10-fold over endogenous Rac1 in the cells (data not shown). The
growth factor (100 nM) caused a small but reproducible
increase (mean 27 ± 7%, n = 5, p < 0.05) in PLD activity in Rat1 fibroblasts transfected with the empty
vector alone (Fig. 1A). The magnitude of the
increase is similar to that seen in Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts (6). In
contrast, EGF caused a much greater response (mean 340%,
n = 5) in Rat1 fibroblasts transfected with wild type
Rac1 (wtRac1) (Fig. 1A). Most strikingly, the PLD response
to EGF was completely inhibited in the Rat1 fibroblasts expressing
dominant negative Rac1 (N17Rac1) (Fig. 1A). N17Rac1 has a
higher affinity for the guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) and
thus blocks the activation of endogenous Rac (19, 27, 28). For
completeness, we also studied Rat1 fibroblasts transfected with
constitutively active Rac1 (V12Rac1). In these cells, the basal level
of PLD activity was increased 1.6-fold, and the response to EGF was
similar to that seen in vector cells (Fig. 1A). However,
these cells showed morphological changes when compared to vector cells.
As found by another group (29), the cells were large and flat, and
showed membrane ruffling, pinocytotic vesicles, and occasional
multinucleation.
The PLD response to EGF in the wtRac1 cells occurred in a dose-dependent manner, and the activity was increased over vector alone at all concentrations of EGF tested (Fig. 1B). In contrast, the PLD response to EGF was completely lost in the N17Rac1 cells at all EGF concentrations tested. These data suggest that Rac1 plays a major role in the activation of PLD by EGF in Rat1 fibroblasts.
PDGF-induced PLD ActivityIn contrast to the striking changes
in EGF-induced PLD activation observed in the cells expressing wild
type and mutant forms of Rac1, the changes in the PDGF response were
much less. PDGF (50 ng/ml) caused a much larger (6-fold) increase in
PLD activity in the vector cells than did EGF (Fig.
2A). Although PLD activity was enhanced in
the wtRac1 cells upon treatment with PDGF, the increase over control
(no EGF) was less than 2-fold greater than that seen in vector cells,
i.e. much less than the 12-fold increase in the increment
due to 100 nM EGF seen when Rac1 and vector cells are
compared (Fig. 1A). The V12Rac1 cells showed the expected increase in basal PLD activity and also an attenuated response to PDGF
when compared to the vector cells. Surprisingly, the N17Rac1 cells
showed no attenuation of PDGF-induced PLD activation. The mean response
of the N17Rac1 cells to PDGF was 6-fold (n = 5) equal
to that in vector cells.
The PLD response to PDGF occurred in a dose-response fashion in the vector, wtRac1, and N17Rac1 cells, with the wtRac1 cell response being greater than the vector cells' response at all concentrations of PDGF (Fig. 2B). The V12Rac1 cells showed an attenuated PDGF response at all concentrations, whereas the response in the N17Rac1 cells was consistently unchanged (Fig. 2B). These data suggest that the PLD response to PDGF in Rat1 fibroblasts is not dependent on Rac1.
Phorbol Ester-induced PLD ActivityIt has been reported
that PKC is required for PLD activation in Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts (6).
In order to determine whether PKC acted upstream of Rac1 in the
regulation of PLD, we tested whether the TPA response differed in Rat1
cells transfected with wild type or mutant forms of Rac1. Vector,
wtRac1, V12Rac1, and N17Rac1 cells all responded in a
dose-dependent manner to TPA (Fig. 3), but
the response did not differ in any of the transfected cells, implying
that Rac1 did not lie "downstream" from PKC, in contrast to what
has been shown for RhoA in Rat1 fibroblasts (23).
Growth Factor-induced PI-PLC Activation
In order to confirm
that the enhanced PLD activity seen in the wtRac1 cells in response to
the growth factors was specific for PLD and that expression of this G
protein did not affect other pathways downstream of their receptors, we
tested whether the ability of growth factors to stimulate PLC activity
was changed. The basal activity of PI-PLC was not altered in the wtRac1
or N17Rac1 cells, but was increased 2-fold in the V12Rac1 cells. Consistent with what is seen in Swiss 3T3 cells, none of the types of
Rat1 cells showed a significant increase in PLC activity in response to
EGF (Fig. 4A) (6). In particular, there was
no response in the wtRac1 cells. In contrast, all the cell types except
the V12Rac1 cells showed increases in PI-PLC activity in response to
PDGF. The responses in the wtRac1, and N17Rac1 cells did not differ
significantly (Fig. 4B). These data indicate that the PLD
changes in the wtRac1 and N17Rac1 cells were not secondary to
alterations in phosphoinositides or PI-PLC.
Level and Autophosphorylation of the EGF and PDGF Receptors
We hypothesized that the increased basal activities of
PLD and PLC and the decreased PLD responses of the V12Rac1 cells to EGF
and PDGF may be due to secondary changes occurring in response to the
expression of constitutively active Rac1. In particular, we
investigated whether the expression of Rac1 altered the level or
autophosphorylation of their receptors (EGFR and PDGFR). Western blotting demonstrated that V12Rac1 cells did, in fact, have a decreased
level of EGFR when compared to vector cells. In contrast, the wtRac1
and N17Rac1 cells showed comparable levels of EGFR when compared to
vector cells (Fig. 5A), supporting the view
that the altered PLD responses were not due to changes in receptor level.2 The V12Rac1 cells also had
decreased EGFR autophosphorylation levels in response to EGF when
compared to the vector cells. The wtRac1 cells showed comparable
autophosphorylation levels when compared to vector cells, and the
N17Rac1 cells showed a slight decrease in EGFR autophosphorylation in
response to EGF (Fig. 5B), but this was insufficient to
explain the total loss of PLD stimulation.
Autophosphorylation of the PDGFR was also measured (Fig. 5C). The wtRac cells showed an attenuated PDGFR autophosphorylation in response to 25 ng/ml PDGF when compared to the vector cells, which cannot explain the increase in PLD activity seen in these cells. Interestingly, the V12Rac1 cells had the same level of PDGFR autophosphorylation in response to PDGF as the vector cells. The N17Rac1 cells also showed the same level of PDGFR autophosphorylation in response to PDGF as the vector cells, and the PLD response to PDGF was the same as the vector cells.
C3 Transferase Effect of PLD ActivityBecause our data
indicated that Rac1 played little or no role in the activation of PLD
by PDGF, we investigated a role for RhoA. We introduced C3 transferase
from C. botulinum into vector and N17Rac1 cells by the
method of scrape-loading. Vector cells treated with C3 toxin show an
80% inhibition in PDGF-induced PLD activity at two concentrations of
PDGF (Fig. 6A). N17Rac1 cells scrape-loaded
with C3 transferase also showed a 70% inhibition of PLD activity in
response to PDGF (Fig. 6B). In vector cells scrape-loaded in
the absence of C3 toxin and treated with 50 ng/ml PDGF, the increase in
PLD activity ranged from 5.8- to 10.6-fold (n = 3).
Although this increase was somewhat variable, we always observed
inhibition by C3 transferase. These results suggest that RhoA mediates
a large fraction of the PDGF-induced activation of PLD in Rat1 cells.
We attempted similar experiments with EGF-treated vector and wtRac1
cells. However, the C3 exoenzyme did not produce consistent effects in
the vector cells. This was due to the small increase in EGF-induced PLD
activity in these, which was rendered variable by scrape-loading. There
was also a large decrease in the viability of C3-treated wtRac1 cells,
rendering the results questionable. For the same reason, PDGF effects
were also not tested in these cells.
Much evidence has accumulated in studies using cell-free systems to suggest that phospholipase D activity can be regulated by small G proteins (15-18, 21, 22), but there have been few reports on the role of the Rho family of small G proteins in activating PLD in intact cells. Recently, Malcolm et al. (23) reported a role for RhoA in agonist-stimulated PLD activity in whole-cell studies performed on Rat1 fibroblasts. The data presented here suggest a role for Rac1 in EGF-induced PLD activity in Rat1 fibroblasts. The PLD response of vector cells to EGF was small, but consistently observed, and was greatly enhanced in wtRac1 cells (Fig. 1). In contrast to the findings with EGF, the vector cells showed a robust PLD response to PDGF, and this response was much less enhanced by Rac1 overexpression (Fig. 2). Most notably, Rac1 was necessary for the response of PLD to EGF, as cells expressing dominant negative N17Rac1 showed no PLD activity in response to EGF. On the other hand, Rac1 was not required for PDGF-induced PLD activity, as the response in N17Rac1 cells was not different from the vector cell response. These results indicate that the EGF and PDGF receptors are acting through different signaling pathways to activate PLD.3 Peppelenbosch et al. (30) using the same cells showed an EGF-induced increase in intracellular Ca2+ was dependent on Rac1, while the PDGF-induced increase in Ca2+ was only partly dependent on Rac1.
Studies in Rat1 cells and other types of fibroblasts show other differences in EGF and PDGF effects. For example, in Rat1 cells (Fig. 4) and Swiss 3T3 cells (6), the activation of PI-PLC is very much greater with PDGF than EGF. Furthermore, although the receptor autophosphorylation sites mediating the interaction of PI-PLC, RasGAP, and the p85 subunit of PI 3-kinase with the PDGF receptor are well defined (31, 32), those for the EGFR are not stringent (33, 34). There are also differences in the affinities of the two receptors for certain Src homology region 2-containing proteins (35, 36). The present findings provide further evidence of differences in the signal transduction pathways for the two receptors.
The cells expressing constitutively active V12Rac1 showed down-regulated responses of PLD and PI-PLC to PDGF. However, these cells showed many other changes. These include increased basal PLD and PI-PLC activities and morphological changes, such as a flattening of the cells, increased pinocytotic vesicles, and the appearance of multinucleated cells. Since autophosphorylation of the PDGFR was not decreased, these findings suggest that the coupling between the receptor and the two phospholipases was impaired. The mechanisms by which increased expression of V12Rac1 leads to such down-regulation are not immediately apparent and could be complex. It is of interest that Peppelenbosch et al. (30) showed that EGF-induced increase in intracellular Ca2+ is mediated by Rac1, and yet they did not observe elevated levels of Ca2+ in V12Rac cells. They also suggest this is due to efficient feedback mechanisms (30).
Since PDGF signaling to PLD did not appear to be dependent on Rac1, we examined the role of RhoA. Rat1 fibroblasts scrape-loaded with 5 µg/ml C3 transferase from C. botulinum showed a 60% decrease in the subsequent in vitro ADP-ribosylation of RhoA when the assay was performed 48 h subsequent to the scrape-loading (data not shown). In addition, when the cells were scrape-loaded with a fluorescent 70-kDa dextran, >90% of the cells showed fluorescence uptake (23). These results suggest that scrape-loading is a valuable technique for introducing proteins into these cells. The C3 transferase treatment resulted in an 80% inhibition in PDGF-induced PLD activity in vector and N17Rac1 cells, indicating that RhoA mediates a large fraction of the PDGF effect in Rat1 fibroblasts. RhoA may also act downstream of Rac1 to mediate EGF-induced PLD activity, as it does in mediating stress fiber formation (37). However, efforts to demonstrate a role for RhoA in the activation of PLD in Rac1-overexpressing cells were thwarted by a great reduction in viability in these cells when they were treated with the C3 transferase. Some loss of viability was seen in the vector and N17Rac1 cells, but this was corrected for by measuring the difference in the incorporation of [3H]myristate into total phospholipids in cells scraped in the presence and absence of C3 transferase, and using this ratio to normalize the data. Thus it is unknown whether RhoA is downstream of Rac1 or acts independently of Rac1 in mediating PLD activity.
The first events in signal transduction from growth factor receptors include dimerization, activation of tyrosine kinase activity, and autophosphorylation (38). Thus it is not surprising that EGF-induced PLD activity in vector and wtRac1 cells was inhibited by 80% by the tyrosine kinase inhibitor genistein (data not shown). However, the pathway of signal transduction from the receptor to Rac1 is unknown. Endothelial cells expressing PDGF receptors that lack the specific phosphorylatable tyrosine residues to which the p85 subunit of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase) binds do not show induction of membrane ruffles, which is mediated by Rac1 in these cells (39). In addition, wortmannin, an inhibitor of PI 3-kinase, blocks membrane ruffling induced by PDGF in Swiss 3T3 cells, a response known to involve Rac (40). Although these data suggest that PI 3-kinase activity is necessary for the activation of Rac1 by PDGF, a role for the kinase in PLD activation has not been reported.4
Activation of the EGFR is known to result in the recruitment of Sos, a GEF for Ras, to the plasma membrane (41). However, this GEF does not act on Rho proteins. A likely explanation for the present results is that the EGFR recruits a GEF(s) that is specific for Rac1 to the plasma membrane. An alternative possibility is that the small G protein may be a more direct target for the growth factor receptor. In this regard, Zubiaur et al. (42) have obtained evidence that Rho associates with the PDGF receptor upon ligand binding in Balb/c 3T3 fibroblasts. In earlier work with a reconstituted vesicle system, purified human placental EGF receptor was observed to phosphorylate a 22-kDa brain protein that was recognized by an antibody to Cdc42Hs, suggesting that this or a similar small G protein is a substrate for the EGF receptor in vitro (43), although such a phosphorylation has not been shown in vivo.
There is much evidence that PKC isozymes mediate the effects of growth factors on PLD in a variety of cells, although the magnitude of their role differs greatly according to cell type (4). Phorbol ester treatment of Rat1 fibroblasts transfected with wtRac1 and mutant Rac1 resulted in the activation of PLD, but the response was approximately equal in all the cell types (Fig. 3). This indicates that Rac1 does not mediate the effects of PKC on PLD in Rat1 fibroblasts, but the reverse question of whether or not PKC mediates the effects of Rac1 remains open. Interestingly, phorbol ester activation of PLD in Rat1 fibroblasts does show some dependence on RhoA, as evidenced by a partial inhibition of phorbol ester-induced PLD activity in Rat1 cells treated with the RhoA inhibitor C3 transferase (23). Previously, it has been reported that PKC plays a large role in the stimulation of PLD by EGF and PDGF in Swiss 3T3 cells (6), and it is probable that this enzyme is involved to some extent in Rat1 fibroblasts. However, it is not known to what extent PKC acts directly on PLD in vivo or produces its effects through or in concert with other proteins, e.g. RhoA (22, 23). Taken together, the present and previous data suggest that different pathways are involved in PLD activation with different agonists and cell types. These pathways appear to involve not only PKC and Rho family proteins, but also the small G protein ARF (16, 17, 44). Much further work is required to delineate the pathways by which Rho, ARF, and PKC activate PLD and also the mechanisms by which growth factors and other agonists activate small G proteins.