Physical and Functional Interactions between the Transcriptional Inhibitors Id3 and ITF-2b
EVIDENCE TOWARD A NOVEL MECHANISM REGULATING MUSCLE-SPECIFIC GENE EXPRESSION*

(Received for publication, June 18, 1996, and in revised form, October 8, 1996)

Binbin Chen Dagger and Robert W. Lim §

From the Department of Pharmacology, University of Missouri, School of Medicine, Columbia, Missouri 65212

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

We have used an interaction cloning strategy to identify an inhibitory isoform of the ITF-2 transcription factor, ITF-2b, that interacts with the transcriptional inhibitor Id3/HLH462. The interaction was confirmed in vitro, and inside intact myogenic C2C12 cells. As expected, overexpression of either Id3/HLH462 or ITF-2b effectively inhibited the activation of the muscle-specific creatine kinase promoter by the myogenic transcription factor MyoD. However, when overexpressed simultaneously, ITF-2b and Id3/HLH462 counteracted each other's inhibitory effect to produce a reduced overall inhibition. Moreover, while ITF-2b inhibited the creatine kinase promoter, it acted as a weak transactivator on an artificial promoter consisting of three tandem copies of the consensus myogenic factor DNA binding site. Further investigation indicated that the ITF-2b/MyoD heterodimer bound to its specific DNA binding site in vitro, and the DNA binding was effectively blocked by Id3/HLH462. Additional analysis revealed the presence of transcripts for both the activating (ITF-2a) and inhibitory (ITF-2b) isoforms in differentiating C2C12 cultures, suggesting that both isoforms might participate in regulating the differentiation process. Taken together, this study reveals a more complex pattern of regulatory interactions involving the helix-loop-helix proteins than was previously anticipated.


INTRODUCTION

The basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH)1 family of transcription factors have been shown to play an important role in regulating muscle-specific gene expression (1, 2). Myogenic bHLH factors heterodimerize with ubiquitously expressed bHLH proteins (referred to as E proteins) and transactivate gene expression through binding to consensus DNA binding sites (E boxes) in the promoter region of various muscle-specific genes (3, 4). In contrast, the Id family proteins, which contain an HLH domain but lack the DNA-binding basic region (5-8), interact preferentially with the E protein family members (8) and sequester them from dimerization with the tissue-specific bHLH factors (5-8), thereby inhibiting gene expression (5). More recent studies have also demonstrated the existence of a new group of bHLH proteins that contain the basic and the HLH domain but nevertheless function as transcriptional inhibitors. One of these inhibitory bHLH proteins, BETA3, interacts with E proteins to form heterodimers that are incapable of DNA binding (9). Recently, an alternatively spliced variant of the E protein ITF-2, ITF-2b, was identified and shown to inhibit the MyoD-mediated transactivation of the cardiac alpha -actin promoter (10), but the exact mechanism responsible for this inhibition has not yet been directly tested. Here we reported the independent and accidental cloning by the yeast two-hybrid system of a full-length ITF-2b cDNA while we were searching for protein factors that interact with the Id protein, Id3/HLH462. We have confirmed that Id3/HLH462 and full-length ITF-2b physically interacted with each other in vitro and complemented each other in a mammalian two-hybrid assay in the myogenic C2C12 cell line. Interestingly, although ITF-2b exhibited a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on the muscle creatine kinase (MCK) promoter in C2C12 cells, it functioned as a transactivator on an artificial promoter containing three tandem E box sites. Moreover, when both Id3/HLH462 and ITF-2b were co-expressed, their combined inhibitory effect on the MCK promoter was attenuated. Gel shift studies revealed that the ITF-2b/MyoD heterodimer formed a strong DNA binding complex comparable with that formed by the MyoD/E47 heterodimer, but the formation of both heterodimer-DNA complexes was effectively inhibited by Id3/HLH462. Analysis of ITF-2 and Id3/HLH462 gene expression revealed that transcripts of both activating (ITF-2a) and inhibitory (ITF-2b) isoforms were present initially in C2C12 cells placed under differentiation-promoting conditions, while the expression of Id3 was high in proliferating cells and declined as the culture differentiated. The potential implication of the expression pattern of ITF-2b and its interaction with Id3/HLH462 in the regulation of terminal myogenesis was discussed.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cloning of ITF-2b by Yeast Two-hybrid System

An Id3/HLH462 cDNA containing the complete open reading frame was removed from the pHLH462 plasmid (ATCC, Rockville, MD) with EcoRI/XhoI digest and subcloned into the EcoRI/SalI site of the GAL4 DNA binding vector, pGBT9 (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) to form pGBTHLH. An 11-day mouse embryo cDNA library in pGAD10 vector (Clontech) was screened according to the manufacturer's protocol to select for genes whose products interact with Id3/HLH462.

Cell Culture

Mouse myogenic C2C12 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and gentamycin as described previously (11). Cell differentiation was induced by changing to DMEM + 5% horse serum.

Transient Transfection

A cDNA containing the complete open reading frame of ITF-2b, corresponding to nucleotides 506-2613 of the published sequence (10) was removed from pGAD10 by EcoRI digest and subcloned into the pEMSV mammalian expression vector (12). An XhoI fragment of Id3/HLH462 from pHLH462 was blunt-end-ligated into the blunted EcoRI site of pEMSV vector to form the Id3 expression plasmid. The p3ESVCAT reporter construct was made by inserting three copies of the E box DNA binding site (5) into the BglII site of a pCAT-Control plasmid (Promega, Madison, WI) with the 3' SV40 enhancer sequence removed by HincII digest. The MCKCAT reporter gene construct contained a 3300-base pair promoter region of the muscle creatine kinase gene (13). Various amount of constructs as described in the individual figure legend was transfected into C2C12 cells cultured on 100-mm dishes by calcium phosphate (14), and the cells were incubated for 3 days in differentiation-permissive medium (DMEM + 5% horse serum) after transfection before harvesting. Chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) assay was done essentially as described (14).

Co-immunoprecipitation Assay in Vitro

The ITF-2b cDNA containing the complete open reading frame was removed as a SalI restriction fragment from the pGAD10 vector and subcloned into the XhoI site of pBlueScript (Strategene, La Jolla, CA) to form pBSITF-2b. The FLAGHLH462 plasmid was made by polymerase chain reaction to insert an antigenic FLAG epitope (15) to the N-terminal of the full-length Id3/HLH462 protein. FLAGHLHDelta H2 was made by removal of a PstI/NarI fragment from the HLH462 plasmid to partially delete the second helix domain. All proteins were made using the TNT®-coupled in vitro transcription/translation reticulocyte lysate system (Promega) and labeled with [3H]leucine. Immunoprecipitation was carried out in buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.2% Triton X-100, using the M2 anti-FLAG antibody (Eastman Kodak Co.)

Interactions of ITF-2b with Id3/HLH462 in the Mammalian Two-hybrid System

A fragment containing the complete open reading frame of ITF-2b was removed from the pGAD10 vector by EcoRI digestion and cloned into the EcoRI site of the mammalian expression vector pVP16 (Clontech). An Id3/HLH462 fragment containing the entire protein coding region was cloned into the EcoRI/SalI site of the pM vector containing the GAL4 DNA binding domain (Clontech). C2C12 cells were transfected with either or both of these vectors together with the G5CAT mammalian reporter plasmid to determine their interactions in intact cells. The assay was performed according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Gel Shift Assay

The assay was carried out as described (5) using in vitro translated proteins produced by TNT®-coupled transcription and translation. The oligonucleotide used in the assay corresponds to the consensus MEF1 binding site (13).

RT-PCR Analysis of mRNA Expression of ITF-2a, ITF-2b, and Id3/HLH462

Total RNAs were isolated from differentiated C2C12 cells at day 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 by the guanidinium isothiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction method (16). First strand cDNA was made by reverse transcription at 37 °C for 2 h and used for PCR amplification using primers that are specific to ITF-2a, ITF-2b Id3, or myogenin. Amplification was first performed with beta -actin primers to normalize the amount of cDNA present in each preparation, and the normalized values were used to adjust for the amount of templates used in the PCR reaction with the gene specific primers. The primer sets specific to each gene for PCR were listed as follows.
ITF-2a: 5'-GGGACAGCGAGTTTGAAATAAAAG-3'
5'-GTCCTTCATAATTGGGAGATGACG-3'
ITF-2b: 5'-TCTCCCATAAGATGAGTATGAGCC-3'
5'-CTCTTTCCTTGGAATATTGTGAGC-3'
Id3/HLH462: 5'-CGACATGAACCACTGCTACTC-3'
5'-GGTCAGTGGCTAAAGCTCCTC-3'
Myogenin: 5'-AGGAGAGAAAGATGGAGTCCAGAG-3'
5'-TAACAAAAGAAGTCACCCCAAGAG-3'
 beta -Actin: 5'-TCCTATGTGGGTGACGAGGC-3'
5'-CATGGCTGGGGTGTTGAAGG-3'

A typical PCR profile used was: 94° 30 s, 59 °C 30 s, 72 °C 1 min for 27 cycles for ITF-2a and ITF-2b, 25 cycles for Id3/HLH462 and myogenin, and 20 cycles for beta -actin, followed by extension at 72 °C for additional 10 min.


RESULTS

We have used the yeast two-hybrid interaction cloning strategy to identify genes whose products can interact with Id3/HLH462. Out of about 4 × 106 yeast clones co-transformed with GBTHLH plasmid and the pGAD10 mouse embryonic cDNA library, 95 clones grew in the absence of histidine, among which 51 clones showed beta -galactosidase activity. Further analysis confirmed 32 clones that showed Id3/HLH462-dependent galactosidase expression. Sequence analysis revealed that all are members of the E protein family (Table I). One of these clones appeared to correspond to a novel splicing variant of ITF-2, ITF-2b, recently isolated by the Mcburney's laboratory and reported to exhibit the unusual property of being able to inhibit the MyoD-mediated transactivation of alpha -cardiac actin gene expression (10). The clone that we isolated contains the complete reading frame of ITF-2b fused to the GAL4 transactivation domain at nucleotide position 506 of the published sequence and ends in the 3'-untranslated region at position 2613 (10).

Table I.

Identity of cDNA clones isolated by interaction cloning with Id3/HLH462

cDNA clones were isolated by yeast two-hybrid interaction cloning. Portions of each clones were sequenced. Identity of the clones were established by comparing the sequence information to the sequences in the GenBankTM EMBL Data base.
Identity Number of clones isolated Ref.

E12 (Pan 1), E47 (Pan 2) 20 18, 19
ITF-2 (E2-2) 9 10, 20-23
HEB (ALF1) 3 24, 25

Since the apparent interaction of two putative inhibitory HLH proteins was unexpected, we wanted to confirm the association of the two proteins under other assay conditions. First, we examined by co-immunoprecipitation experiment to see if in vitro translated Id3/HLH462 and ITF-2b proteins could interact with each other without the attached GAL4 DNA binding and transactivation domains used in the yeast two-hybrid assay. Using an antibody directed against the FLAG antigenic epitope, we showed that ITF-2b was co-precipitated with the FLAG-tagged Id3/HLH462 protein. A second helix deletion mutant of Id3 (FLAGHLHDelta H2), which exhibited a dramatically reduced inhibitory effect on MCK gene expression,2 co-precipitated ITF-2b to a much lower extent (Fig. 1A). An unrelated protein, luciferase, was not precipitated at all by the anti-FLAG antibody. The result indicates that the interaction of ITF-2b and Id3 is specific and may be dependent on an intact HLH domain in Id3. The relatively small amount of ITF-2b co-precipitated in comparison with the amount added may reflect the inefficiency of the in vitro assay system or steric hindrance by the precipitating antibody.


Fig. 1. Interaction of ITF-2b with Id3/HLH462 in vitro and in a mammalian two-hybrid system. A, reticulocyte lysates containing the indicated combinations of in vitro-translated [3H]Leu-labeled ITF-2b, and FLAG epitope-tagged Id3/HLH462 wild-type or mutant proteins were used in co-immunoprecipitation studies using an anti-FLAG antibody. In vitro translated luciferase was used as a negative control for nonspecific trapping. Immunoprecipitates were dissolved in 2 × SDS sample buffer and analyzed on 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gel (first through the fourth lanes). For comparison, ITF-2b- and luciferase-containing reticulocyte lysates equal to the amounts used for immunoprecipitation were also analyzed (fifth and sixth lanes). The gel was fixed, soaked in fluorographic enhancing solution (Amersham Corp.), and exposed to Kodak x-ray film. B, ITF-2b and Id3/HLH462 were subcloned into appropriate mammalian expression vectors to fuse in-frame with the VP16 transactivation domain and the GAL4 DNA binding domain, respectively, to produce the expression constructs pVPITF-2b and pMHLH462. 5 µg of each resulting constructs were co-transfected into C2C12 cells with 4 µg of CMVbeta gal and 2 µg of the reporter construct G5CAT which contains the GAL4 DNA binding sites in its promoter. Negative control cultures were transfected with either the pMHLH462 or pVPITF-2b construct and the reciprocal empty expression vectors pVP16 or pM, respectively, as indicated. Cells transfected with 5 µg of a construct encoding covalently linked VP16 and GAL4 domains were included as a positive control to determine the maximal activation that could be achieved in the test system. The interaction between ITF-2b and Id3/HLH462 was analyzed by CAT assay after normalization for beta -galactosidase activity. The data presented was from one experiment with triplicate determinations (average ± S.E.). Similar results were obtained in two other experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (20K GIF file)]


As a further confirmation of the ability of ITF-2b to associate with Id3, we also analyzed the interaction between these two proteins using the mammalian two-hybrid systems. As shown in Fig. 1B, full-length ITF-2b fused to the VP16 transactivation domain was able to complement an Id3/GAL4 DNA binding domain fusion protein to transactivate a GAL4-regulated promoter in transfected C2C12 cells. The resulting CAT activity was 50-200-fold higher than what was obtained with expression vectors lacking one or the other of the interacting proteins and reached about 20% the level obtained with the covalently linked Gal4-VP16 fusion protein. Thus, the two inhibitory proteins could associate inside mammalian cells with affinity that is consistent with a specific noncovalent interaction.

Next we want to confirm that ITF-2b could indeed inhibit muscle-specific gene expression as reported previously (10) and to examine the potential consequence when two mutually interacting inhibitory HLH proteins were co-expressed in the same cell. We first demonstrated that both Id3/HLH462 and ITF-2b could inhibit the ability of MyoD to transactivate the expression of a muscle-specific creatine kinase (MCK) promoter-regulated CAT reporter gene in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2). Interestingly, when ITF-2b and Id3/HLH462 were co-expressed, the inhibitory effect on MCK gene expression was attenuated relative to what was observed when each protein was expressed by itself. This apparent mutual interference of inhibitory activity presumably was due to the formation of Id3/HLH462 and ITF-2b complexes that were no longer capable of inhibiting MCK gene expression.


Fig. 2. Effect of ITF-2b and Id3/HLH462 on MCKCAT expression in C2C12 cells. The indicated amounts of ITF-2b and Id3/HLH462 expression constructs (in pEMSV plasmid) were transfected into C2C12 cells by the calcium phosphate method, together with 4 µg of CMVbeta gal, 2 µg of a MyoD expression plasmid (pEMC11) and 2 µg of a MCKCAT reporter plasmid. The total amount of plasmid DNA used in each transfection was equalized by adding different amounts of the empty pEMSV vector. The transfection efficiency was normalized according to the beta -galactosidase activity in cell extract and the CAT activity was expressed as percent of the activity obtained with pEMCE11 alone without either ITF-2b or Id3 (control). The data represent averages and ranges of duplicate determinations and similar results were observed in three independent experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (23K GIF file)]


In order to determine the mechanism through which ITF-2b might inhibit MCK promoter activity, we examined whether ITF-2b protein could form homo- or heterodimers that bind to the consensus MyoD/E protein binding site (E box). As shown in Fig. 3, only a faint DNA-protein complex was detectable when the labeled oligonucleotide was incubated with in vitro translated ITF-2b protein alone, suggesting that ITF-2b either could not homodimerize efficiently or that the homodimer could not bind DNA well. When ITF-2b was co-incubated with the activating E protein, E47, the mobility of the shifted complexes that were formed resembled those formed by ITF-2b and E47 homodimers, suggesting that the ITF-2b/E47 heterodimer might bind DNA with relatively low affinity. That ITF-2b-E47 heterodimers were formed was supported by the fact that the presence of the ITF-2 protein resulted in a much reduced level of apparent E47 homodimer/DNA complexes as compared with that seen with E47 alone. In contrast to these weak interactions, ITF-2b/MyoD heterodimers formed a very strong DNA complex comparable to the E47/MyoD heterodimer DNA complex, but the formation of both complexes was still efficiently blocked by Id3/HLH462. Taken together, our data indicate that ITF-2b did not inhibit MyoD function because of failure to bind DNA.


Fig. 3. Sequence-specific DNA binding by ITF-2b homo- or heterodimers in the presence and absence of Id3/HLH462. 2 µl of reticulocyte lysates containing in vitro translated ITF-2b, or MyoD, or 1 µl of E47-containing lysates were individually incubated with an E box-containing oligonucleotide to detect homodimer binding to DNA. Half this amount of each protein was mixed and co-incubated to detect heterodimer DNA binding. Two to three-fold excess in vitro translated flag-epitope-tagged Id3/HLH462 was added to a set of duplicate samples to examine the inhibitory effect of Id3 on the DNA binding of each of these complexes. The total reaction mixture in each sample was adjusted to 5 µl by adding mock-translation reticulocyte lysate.
[View Larger Version of this Image (86K GIF file)]


Unlike ITF-2b, the human ITF-2 protein (also called E2-2) with the first 49 amino acid missing from its N-terminal was reported to cooperate with MyoD to transactivate an artificial reporter gene, (MEF1)4CAT, containing four tandem MyoD binding MEF1 sites (4). Since the inhibitory activity of ITF-2b appeared to reside in the N-terminal first 83 amino acids (10), it was assumed that the differential activity of the two proteins was due to the absence of the 49 amino acids. To test this assumption, we also examined the effect of the full-length ITF-2b protein on the MyoD-mediated transactivation of a reporter gene containing three copies of the MEF1 sites (3ESVCAT). Surprisingly, whereas Id3/HLH462 remained fully inhibitory on this reporter gene, the full-length ITF-2b protein was no longer inhibitory but instead enhanced the transcriptional activity of MyoD (Fig. 4). It thus appeared that ITF-2b-MyoD heterodimerization did not always result in a transcriptionally silent DNA binding complex.


Fig. 4. Effect of ITF-2b and Id3/HLH462 on 3ESVCAT expression. The indicated amounts of ITF-2b and Id3/HLH462 expression plasmids were transfected into C2C12 cells by the calcium phosphate method, together with 4 µg of CMVbeta gal, 2 µg of MyoD expression plasmid pEMC11, and 5 µg of 3ESVCAT plasmid. The control sample was transfected with pEMC11 without either ITF-2b or Id3, and the CAT activity from the sample was set as 100%. All transfections were adjusted with the pEMSV plasmid to equalize the amount of DNA used in the transfection. Transfection efficiency was normalized according to the beta -galactosidase activity in cell extract. The results shown represent the averages and ranges from duplicate determination. Similar results were obtained in three independent experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (34K GIF file)]


While the preceding data provided clear evidence for the biochemical function of the ITF-2b protein, the biological relevance of this protein to the muscle differentiation process could not be inferred from these results alone. To explore this question further, we have analyzed the mRNA expression patterns of both the activating and "inhibitory" ITF-2 isoforms (ITF-2a and ITF-2b) by RT-PCR during the in vitro differentiation of the myogenic C2C12 cells. Results of this assay indicated that both transcripts were absent in proliferating cells but became detectable as the cells were placed into differentiation-permissive conditions (Fig. 5). In contrast, the Id3 gene was expressed in proliferating C2C12 cells and down-regulated as the cultures were allowed to differentiate. Whether both Id3 and ITF-2b proteins are co-expressed in the same cells at some point during the differentiation process is an interesting question that would need to be confirmed when appropriate antibodies become available.


Fig. 5. RT-PCR analysis of expression of ITF-2a, ITF-2b, Id3/HLH462 and myogenin. The expression pattern of ITF-2a, ITF-2b, Id3/HLH462, and myogenin was analyzed by RT-PCR of total RNA from C2C12 cells placed into differentiation-permissive conditions for the indicated number of days. The PCR products were analyzed on agarose gel and detected by ethidium bromide staining. The amount of cDNA templates used in each assay was normalized according to the beta -actin level. PCR was performed according to the parameters indicated under "Material and Methods." The number of PCR cycles was minimized to avoid overamplification of the messages and thus resulted in a relative low yield of PCR products.
[View Larger Version of this Image (42K GIF file)]



DISCUSSION

We reported in this manuscript the cloning of an inhibitory form of the murine ITF-2 protein, ITF-2b, by virtue of its interaction with another transcriptional inhibitory protein Id3. The interaction was confirmed by in vitro co-immunoprecipitation analysis and DNA binding assay, by functional complementation in the mammalian two-hybrid system and by mutual antagonism in the MCK reporter gene assay. Moreover, our data revealed that the inhibitory function of ITF-2b was evident on the MCK reporter gene but not with an artificial promoter regulated by the MEF1 (E box) DNA binding site. Interestingly, ITF-2b mRNA was not detectable in proliferating myoblasts but became observable in cells initiating the differentiation process.

One possible explanation for the rather complex behavior of the ITF-2b protein is that the inhibitory domain in ITF-2b might prevent the myogenic factor-ITF-2b protein heterodimer from interacting with transcription factors bound to other regulatory elements in the MCK enhancer that are required for maximal MCK activation. Such interactions might be dispensable in the case of the artificial promoter regulated solely by multiple E boxes. The inhibitory effect on the cardiac alpha -actin promoter could be explained if similar interactions were required for its full activation. Thus depending on the constellation of factors that are needed to activate the expression of a particular gene, ITF-2b might exert either inhibitory or activating influences in a promoter-specific manner. It would be very interesting to know whether ITF-2b will inhibit or activate other muscle-specific genes as well as other tissue-specific genes that depend on bHLH proteins for transcriptional activation (17).

The reason for the enigmatic increase in the transcripts of the inhibitory ITF-2b isoform when cells were first exposed to differentiation-inducing conditions is not clear. One possibility is that it might serve to prevent cells from initiating the differentiation process prematurely in response to small fluctuations in the extracellular environment. This inhibitory effect would be overcome when the expression levels and activities of the myogenic regulatory factors and the activating E proteins became sufficiently elevated and the levels of the inhibitory Id proteins declined. Alternatively, the expression of the ITF-2b isoform in differentiating muscle cells might allow different muscle-specific genes to be regulated independently in a promoter-specific manner. Which if either of these speculative models are accurate can only be borne out by further investigations. Taken together, our data presented here painted a more complex picture concerning the regulatory interactions between the HLH proteins than previously recognized. The complete implication of these interactions remains to be elucidated.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by Public Health Service Grant AR40562 from the NIAMSD and a grant from the Muscular Dystrophy Association (to R. W. L.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    Current address: Beth Israel Hospital, Cancer Biology Program, HIM1043, 330 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA 02215.
§   To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology, University of Missouri, School of Medicine, Columbia, MO 65212. Tel.: 573-882-1560; Fax: 573-884-4558; E-mail: pharmrwl{at}muccmail.missouri.edu.
1    The abbreviations used are: bHLH; basic helix-loop-helix; HLH, helix-loop-helix; MCK, muscle creatine kinase; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, RT-PCR, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.
2    B. Chen and R. W. Lim, unpublished observation.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Xianwu Li for help with the yeast two-hybrid cDNA library screening and Melissa Nevils for help with the RT-PCR.


REFERENCES

  1. Edmondson, D. G., and Olson, E. N. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 755-758 [Free Full Text]
  2. Weintraub, H., Davis, R., Tapscott, S., Thayer, M., Krause, M., Benezra, R., Blackwell, T. K., Turner, D., Rupp, R., Hollenberg, S., Zhuang, Y., and Lassar, A. (1991) Science 251, 761-766 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Murre, C., McCaw, P. S., Vaessin, H., Caudy, M., Jan, L. Y., Jam, Y. N., Cabrera, C. V., Bruskin, J. N., Hauschka, S. D., Lassar, A. B., Weintraub, H., and Baltimore, D. (1989) Cell 58, 537-544 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Lassar, A. B., Davis, R. L., Wright, W. E., Kadesch, T., Murre, C., Voronova, A., Baltimore, D., and Weintraub, H. (1991) Cell 66, 305-315 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Benezra, R., Davis, R. L., Lockshon, D., Turner, D. L., and Weintraub, H. (1990) Cell 61, 49-59 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Christy, B. A., Sanders, L. K., Lau, L. F., Copeland, N. G., Jenkins, N. A., and Nathans, D. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 1815-1819 [Abstract]
  7. Riechmann, V., Cruchten, I. V., and Sablitzky, F. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 749-755 [Abstract]
  8. Sun, X.-H., Copeland, N. G., Jenkins, N. A., and Baltimore, D. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 5603-5611 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Peyton, M., Stellrecht, C. M. M., Naya, F. J., Huang, H.-P., Samora, P. J., and Tsai, M.-J. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 626-633 [Abstract]
  10. Skerjanc, I. S., Truong, J., Filion, P., and McBurney, M. W. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 3555-3561 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Lim, R. W., Zhu, C. Y., and Stringer, B. (1995) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1266, 91-100 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Davis, R. L., Weintraub, H., and Lassar, A. B. (1987) Cell 51, 987-1000 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Amacher, S. L., Buskin, J. N., and Hauschka, S. D. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 2753-2764 [Abstract]
  14. Titus, D. E. (1991) Promega Protocols and Applications Guide, 2nd Ed., Promega Corp., Madison, WI
  15. Blanar, M., and Rutter, W. J. (1992) Science 256, 1014-1018 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Chomczynski, P., Sacchi, N., and Bondurant, M. C. (1987) Anal. Biochem. 162, 156-159 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Bain, G., Gruenwald, S., and Murre, C. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 3522-3529 [Abstract]
  18. Murre, C., Bain, G., Dijk, M. A. V., Engel, I., furnari, B. A., Massari, M. E., Matthews, J. R., Quong, M. W., Rivera, R. R., and Stuiver, M. V. (1994) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1218, 129-135 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Davis, R. L., Cheng, P.-F., Lassar, A. B., and Weintraub, H. (1990) Cell 60, 733-746 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Nelson, C., Shen, L.-P., Meister, A., Fodor, E., and Rutter, W. (1990) Genes Dev. 4, 1035-1043 [Abstract]
  21. Henthorn, P., McCarrick-Walmsley, R., and Kadesch, T. (1990) Nucleic Acid Res. 18, 678 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Henthorn, P., Kiledjian, M., and Kadesch, T. (1990) Science 247, 467-470 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Yoon, S. O., and Chikaraishi, D. M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 18453-18462 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Corneliussen, B., Thornell, A., Hallberg, B., and Grundstrom, T. (1991) J. Virol. 65, 6084-6093 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Hu, J. S., Olson, E. N., and Kingston, R. E. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 1031-1042 [Abstract]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.