Expression and Characterization of the Small Subunit of Human DNA Polymerase delta *

(Received for publication, October 22, 1996, and in revised form, February 4, 1997)

Yubo Sun , Yunquan Jiang , Peng Zhang , Shan-Jian Zhang , Yi Zhou , Bao Qing Li , N. Lan Toomey and Marietta Y. W. T. Lee Dagger

From the Departments of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Medicine, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida 33101

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

DNA polymerase delta  is a heterodimer consisting of a catalytic subunit of 125 kDa and a small subunit of 50 kDa (p50). We have overexpressed p50 in Escherichia coli and have characterized the recombinant protein. p50 was readily overexpressed using the pET vector as an insoluble protein. A procedure was developed for its purification and renaturation. Examination of the physicochemical properties of renatured p50 showed that it is a monomeric protein with an apparent molecular weight of 60,000, a Stokes radius of 34 Å, and a sedimentation coefficient of 4.1 S. Its physical properties were indistinguishable from p50 expressed as a soluble protein using the pTACTAC vector. Examination of the effects of recombinant p50 on the activity of DNA polymerase delta  showed that p50 is able to slightly stimulate (about 2-fold) the activity of the recombinant 125-kDa catalytic subunit using poly(dA)·oligo(dT) as a template in the absence of proliferating cell nuclear antigen. In the presence of proliferating cell nulear antigen, activity is stimulated about 5-fold. Seven stable hybridoma cell lines were established that produced monoclonal antibodies against p50. One of these antibodies (13D5) inhibited the activity of calf thymus DNA polymerase delta . This antibody, when coupled to a solid support, also was found to provide a method for the immunoafffinity purification of recombinant p50 and of DNA polymerase delta  from calf thymus or HeLa extracts. Immunoprecipitation and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays also confirmed that p50 interacts with the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase delta .


INTRODUCTION

DNA polymerase (pol)1 delta  is involved in both DNA replication (1) and DNA repair (2) in mammalian cells. Its activity is stimulated by PCNA, a DNA sliding clamp which provides the processivity required for its role in DNA replication (3, 4). In addition to PCNA, a number of other accessory proteins are required for the assembly of a functional replication complex at the leading strand of the replication fork. These include the multi-subunit replication factor C (RF-C) complex and replication protein A (RP-A), a single-stranded DNA-binding protein (5). pol delta  isolated from calf thymus (6) and human placenta (7) is a heterodimer of 125- and 50-kDa polypeptides. The catalytic activity had been clearly demonstrated to be associated with the 125-kDa subunit (7), and preparations of mammalian pol delta  have been reported that contain only the active 125-kDa subunit (8, 9). Goulian et al. (9) isolated two preparations of mouse DNA polymerase delta , one of which consisted of a single polypeptide of 123-125 kDa and was unresponsive to PCNA stimulation. It was suggested that the 50-kDa polypeptide is required for the stimulation of DNA polymerase delta  by PCNA (9). However, yeast pol delta  catalytic subunit overexpressed in Escherichia coli was stimulated 2.5- to 3-fold (10). Human pol delta  catalytic subunit expressed in the vaccinia virus system also showed a slight increase in activity in the presence of PCNA (11). This increase in activity is significantly lower than the 34-fold stimulation of the native human DNA polymerase delta  core reported previously in our laboratory (7). In this study we report the expression of human p50 in E. coli and its biochemical characterization.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Expression of p50

The cDNA of p50 was isolated by PCR cloning using primers based on the reported sequence of human p50 (12). The coding sequence was inserted into both the pET21a (Novagen) and pTACTAC vectors (13, 14). PCR amplification was used for the insertion of the coding sequence of human p50 between the NdeI and HindIII sites of the vectors. The primer 5'-CAGGAGTGTGCATATGTTTTCTGAGC-3' was used for the 5' end of the coding sequence with an engineered NdeI site (underlined residues) at the initiating methionine codon (bold residues). The antisense primer at the 3' end (5'-CCACAAGCTTGAGTCAGGGGCC-3') had a HindIII site (underlined residues) after the termination codon (bold residues). The primers were phosphorylated with T4 polynucleotide kinase before use. The PCR conditions used were 95 °C for 1.5 min, 45 °C for 2 min, and 72 °C for 3 min, for 30 cycles. The product was a single band of about 1.4 kilobases, which was subsequently purified on a Centricon 100 column followed by phenol/chloroform extraction. After digestion with NdeI and HindIII, the PCR product was ligated into the pET vector that had been previously digested with NdeI and HindIII and purified by agarose gel electrophoresis. The construct was then used to transform E. coli DH5alpha -competent cells. The correctness of the inserted DNA was confirmed by DNA sequencing. A single colony from E. coli DH5alpha cells harboring the pET21a/p50 construct was used to inoculate a 5-ml culture in Terrific medium (1.2% tryptone, 2.4% yeast extract, 0.4% glycerol, 0.017 M KH2PO4, 0.072 M K2HPO4, 50 µg/ml ampicillin). After overnight growth at 37 °C, the 5-ml culture was used to inoculate a 2-liter culture in LB medium and grown at 37 °C for 4-6 h until the absorbance reached 0.6 at 600 nm. Isopropyl-beta -thiogalactoside was then added to a concentration of 0.5 mM, and the culture was grown for an additional 6 h at 37 °C. A similar procedure was used for the insertion of the coding sequence for p50 into the pTACTAC vector (14, 15).

Purification and Renaturation of Recombinant p50

The cells from 1 liter of culture harboring the p50-pET21a plasmid were harvested by centrifugation at 3,000 × g, 4 °C for 30 min, and frozen overnight. The frozen cells were suspended in lysis buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.25 M sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM EGTA, 10 mM benzamidine HCl, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.1 M NaCl) and disrupted using a French press. The suspension was centrifuged at 27,000 × g at 4 °C for 30 min. The pellet was resuspended in 50 ml of lysis buffer containing 0.5 M NaCl, and sonicated. The suspension was centrifuged at 27,000 × g in 4 °C for 30 min. The resulting pellet was then sonicated in 10 ml of 200 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.5 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, and 6 M urea to solubilize the pellet and was centrifuged at 12,000 × g at 4 °C for 30 min. The resulting supernatant (5 ml, 60 mg of protein) was loaded onto a Sephacryl S300HR column (2.5 × 72 cm) equilibrated with 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM EGTA, 0.5 M NaCl, and M urea. Fractions (4 ml) were collected, and the elution of p50 was monitored by SDS-PAGE and protein staining. Renaturation was performed by HPLC chromatography in a buffer containing 0.25 M NaCl instead of 2 M urea. A portion of the peak fraction (0.45 ml) was injected onto a Waters Protein Pak 300SW column equilibrated with 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 5% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM EGTA, 0.25 mM NaCl, and 1 mM DTT. Fractions of 0.5 ml were collected and analyzed for p50 by immunoblotting using a monoclonal antibody.

Generation of Monoclonal Antibodies against Recombinant p50 and Preparation of a p50 Immunoaffinity Column

A panel of murine hybridoma cell lines that produced antibodies against p50 was developed by immunizing three female BALB/c mice with recombinant p50 purified to the Sephacryl S300HR step. The mice were injected intraperitoneally with 100 µg of p50 emulsified with complete Freund's adjuvant. Two weeks later the mice were given a booster injection of another 100 µg of p50 with incomplete Freund's adjuvant. The booster was repeated at monthly intervals. One of the mice exhibited a high titer after two booster injections and was sacrificed 3 days after the final booster injection. The procedure for fusion of the spleen cells to produce hybridomas was as described by Lee et al. (16). Western blotting of hybridoma cell supernatants was used to screen for positives. SDS-PAGE and Western blotting were performed as described previously (17). The antigen used for screening was the native pol delta  enzyme isolated by immunoaffinity chromatography from the calf thymus (17). Positive hybridoma cultures were isolated by limiting dilution three times. Seven stable hybridomas were established. Antibodies were isolated by purification on protein A-Sepharose columns.

Immunoaffinity Purification of Recombinant p50 Expressed in the pTACTAC Vector

Purified antibody 13D5 was coupled onto AvidChrom hydrazide (Sigma) as described by Jiang et al. (17). A cell lysate from 6 liters of an induced culture of E. coli harboring the p50-pTACTAC plasmid (6 g of protein in 300 ml) was precipitated by the addition of ammonium sulfate to 50% saturation. The pellet was then resuspended in TGEE buffer (40 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM EGTA). The solution (1.7 g of protein in 200 ml) was then applied to a 5-ml 13D5 immunoaffinity column. The column was washed with 50 ml of TGEE buffer containing containing 0.4 M NaCl. The p50 was eluted with 0.1 M triethylamine, pH 11.5, that was immediately neutralized with 1 M Tris-HCl, pH 6.8. Peak fractions containing p50 were pooled (1.2 mg of protein in 19 ml) and diluted with TGEE to 150 ml. The partially purified protein was again subjected to immunoaffinity chromatography. The final p50 eluate was pooled and dialyzed against three changes of TGEE buffer containing 1 mM DTT, and concentrated by centrifugation in Centricon membrane filters to a final volume of 1.5 ml containing 0.26 mg of protein.

Immunoprecipitation of Pol delta

Cells from a 1-liter culture of HeLa cells were sonicated in 10 ml of lysis buffer (40 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 0.25 M sucrose, 0.1 M NaCl, 1.0 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM EGTA, 10 mM benzamidine HCl, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 0.1% Nonidet P-40). The extract was centrifuged at 20,000 × g and at 4 °C for 30 min to remove cell debris. The supernatant was then batch-adsorbed onto 4-ml of protein A-agarose equilibrated with TGEEN buffer (40 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM EGTA, 0.15 M NaCl, 0.1% Nonidet P-40) and rotated for 16 h at 4 °C to remove the nonspecific binding proteins. The protein A-agarose-treated HeLa cell extract (400 µg of protein) was incubated with 20 µg of p50 monoclonal antibody at 0 °C for 60 min in a total volume of 200 µl of TGEEN buffer. Fifty µl of a 25% protein A-agarose suspension was added, and the suspension was rotated at 4 °C for 12 h. The affinity beads were then collected by a brief centrifugation for 15 s. The beads were washed 4 times with TGEEN buffer (1 ml each wash). Bound proteins were released from beads by heating for 2 min at 100 °C in 50 µl of SDS-PAGE sample buffer (60 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 10% glycerol, 5% mercaptoethanol, and 2% SDS) and were used for Western blot analysis using 78 F5 pol delta  monoclonal antibody.

Assays for Enzyme Activities

DNA polymerase activity was assayed using poly(dA)·oligo(dT) in the presence or absence of PCNA as described by Lee et al. (7). 3'-5'-Exonuclease and 5'-3'-exonuclease assays were performed as described by Lee et al. (6).

ELISA Assays

ELISA assays were performed according to Dornreiter et al. (18) and Lee et al. (19) with minor modifications. ELISA plates were coated with 300 ng/well p125 protein in 50 µl of phosphate-buffered saline buffer, pH 7.5, for 1 h at room temperature. In a parallel experiment, ELISA plates were coated with BSA as a negative control. After washing twice with phosphate-buffered saline buffer, the ELISA wells were blocked with 5% (w/v) BSA in phosphate-buffered saline buffer overnight, and the wells were washed twice with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40 (Buffer A). Increasing amounts of p50 in 50 µl of buffer A were added, and the plates were shaken gently for 1 h at 4 °C. The unbound proteins were removed by washing six times with buffer A. For detection of p50, 1 µg of monoclonal antibody (17D2) in 50 µl of buffer A containing 3% (w/v) BSA was incubated with the plates for 1 h at room temperature. The plates were washed six times with buffer A followed by a 40-min incubation with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (1:1000, Amersham) in Buffer A containing 3% BSA. The reaction was developed with tetramethylbenzidine base (TMB-ELISA, Pierce) for 5-10 min and quantitated at 450 nm with a microtiter plate reader (Bio-Rad). In a reciprocal experiment, 300 ng of p50 and BSA were immobilized on ELISA plates and blocked with 5% (w/v) BSA. After washing, increasing amounts of p125 were added to the ELISA plates. Monoclonal antibody against the p125 (1 µg, 7B7) was used for the detection of p125 as described above.


RESULTS

Expression of the p50 Subunit in E. coli

The cDNA for the p50 subunit was cloned by PCR amplification from a human liver lambda gt11 cDNA library using primers based on the reported cDNA sequence of the human p50 subunit (12). The cDNA clone consisted of a 1519-nucleotide sequence with an open reading frame of 469 amino acid residues encoding the identical amino acid sequence as reported by Zhang et al. (12). The p50 protein was readily overexpressed in E. coli when the pET21a vector was used (see "Experimental Procedures"). As has been commonly observed for a number of overexpressed proteins, the recombinant p50 protein was expressed as an insoluble form in inclusion bodies. The p50 was extracted from the inclusion bodies using 6 M urea, and approximately 60 mg of protein could be obtained from a 1-liter cell culture. The major protein component of the extract was p50, as determined by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting (not shown). The solubilized protein was then purified by gel filtration in the presence of 2 M urea on a Sephacryl S300HR column. During this process the p50 protein remained in solution in 2 M urea. A portion of the peak fraction was then subjected to HPLC gel permeation chromatography in the presence of 0.25 M NaCl to remove the urea. This process was found to allow the apparent renaturation of the p50, as it now behaved as a soluble protein as shown by the HPLC elution (Fig. 1A). The presence of the p50 protein was determined by immunoblotting using 13D5, a p50 monoclonal antibody (see "Experimental Procedures"). It is seen that most of the protein is in the included fraction of the column with a small amount eluting in the void volume.


Fig. 1. HPLC gel permeation chromatography of recombinant p50. Panel A, recombinant p50 solubilized in 2 M urea (0.45 ml, ~0.3 mg of the peak fraction from the S300 HR column (see "Experimental Procedures") was loaded onto a Protein Pak Glass 300 SW (Waters) column equilibrated in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 5% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 0.l mM EGTA, 0.25 mM NaCl, l mM DTT. The column was developed with the same buffer. Fractions of 0.5 ml were collected. SDS-PAGE (5-15% acrylamide) was performed with 10 µl of the indicated fractions (10-16, 27-31). The absorbance at 280 nm is shown by the solid circles. Panel B, aliquots (10 µl) of fractions 24-32 were added to assays for pol delta  activity (7) using poly(dA)·oligo(dT) as a template in the presence of 0.5 µg of PCNA and a constant amount of recombinant pol delta  p125 (see "Experimental Procedures"). The results are plotted as stimulation over a control fraction where no p50 was added. Panel C, pol delta  activity was assayed using poly(dA)·oligo(dT) as a template in the presence of 0.5 µg of recombinant PCNA and a constant amount of recombinant pol delta  p125. The amounts of p50 used per assay were 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1 µg, respectively. The results are plotted as stimulation over a control assay where no p50 was added.
[View Larger Version of this Image (40K GIF file)]

Effect of p50 on Pol delta  Activity

To test whether this solubilized p50 material had any effect on the p125 catalytic subunit of pol delta , samples of the fractions were added to a standard assay for pol delta  activity in the presence of PCNA using purified recombinant p125 obtained by expression in Sf9 cells. The results show that the renatured p50 was able to stimulate pol delta  activity by roughly 2.5-fold and that this stimulatory effect coincided with the peak of p50 protein (Fig. 1B). To further establish that this was a functional effect of p50 on pol delta  activity, samples of the peak fraction from the HPLC run (fraction 30, Fig. 1A) were used to determine whether this stimulation was concentration-dependent. The results (Fig. 1C) showed that a response could be seen in the range of 0.1-1 µg of p50/assay. The renatured recombinant p50 did not have any effect on the 3'-5'-exonuclease activity of pol delta  (not shown) and did not possess DNA binding ability as it did not bind to double- or single-stranded DNA cellulose columns. Analysis of the renatured p50 for 3'-5'- and 5'-3'-exonuclease activities showed that these were absent.

Physicochemical Characterization of Recombinant p50

The p50 obtained after HPLC gel permeation chromatography was characterized to determine whether it behaved as a globular protein. The apparent molecular mass was determined to be ~60 kDa by HPLC gel permeation chromatography. A Stokes radius of 34 Å was obtained when the data were plotted against the Stokes radii of the protein standards (Fig. 2A). This can be compared with the Stokes radius of bovine serum albumin, a globular protein, which is 36 Å. The sedimentation coefficient of p50 was found to be 4.1 S by glycerol gradient ultracentrifugation (Fig. 2B). These data confirm that the renatured p50 behaves as a monomeric protein and has physicochemical properties consistent with it having refolded into a native globular state. The isoelectric point of p50 was determined in acrylamide gels to be 5.3 (not shown).


Fig. 2. Physicochemical characterization of recombinant p50. Panel A, determination of Stokes radius by HPLC gel permeation chromatography. Purified p50 (200 µl, 80 µg) was injected onto a Bio-Rad SEC-250 column. The column was developed with TGEE buffer, 1 mM DTT, 250 mM NaCl (see "Experimental Procedures"). Fractions of 0.5 ml were collected. Standards used in a total volume of 200 µl were: thyroglobulin (669 kDa, 85 Å), catalase (240 kDa, 50.2 Å), alcohol dehydrogenase (140 kDa, 46 Å), BSA (66 kDa, 35.5 Å), and cytochrome c (12.5 kDa, 10 Å). The elution of p50 was monitored by Western blotting of the fractions using a monoclonal antibody to p50. The immunoblot of the peak fractions is shown in the inset. Panel B, glycerol gradient ultracentrifugation. Proteins were ultracentrifuged in sample volumes of 200 µl on glycerol gradients from 10 to 30% in TGEE buffer, 0.5 M NaCl and 1 mM DTT in a total volume of 5 ml. The samples were ultracentrifuged in a Beckman SW50.1 rotor at 105,000 × g, 4 °C, for 17 h. Fractions (200 µl) were collected from the top of the tube. SDS-PAGE and Western blots were performed for determination of the elution of p50. Standards used were catalase, 11.3 S; aldolase, 7.3 S; BSA, 4.4 S; carbonic anhydrase, 3.3 S; and cytochrome c, 1.7 S.
[View Larger Version of this Image (24K GIF file)]

Expression of p50 as a Soluble Protein

Because of concerns that the renatured p50 might not represent a native folded protein, we expressed p50 in the pTACTAC vector, which has been shown to allow expression of several proteins in a soluble form when induced at room temperature rather than at 37 °C (13-15). The results showed that this vector allowed the expression of p50 in a soluble state, although the levels were much lower than in the pET21a vector. The soluble p50 expressed using the pTACTAC vector therefore required a much more extensive purification than the material from the pET vector, where the inclusion bodies were largely composed of p50 itself. This problem was solved by the use of an immunoaffinity column using a monoclonal antibody against p50, 13D5 (see below). The cell lysate from 6 liters of culture was partially purified by 50% ammonium sulfate precipitation and passed through a monoclonal anti-p50 column as described under "Experimental Procedures." The yield of soluble protein was 0.26 mg starting from 6 liters of cells and provided a near homogeneous preparation of p50 (Fig. 3). The p50 expressed using the pET21a and pTACTAC vectors and that of p50 in the calf thymus pol delta  core were all immunoblotted by monoclonal antibody 13D5, which provided additional confirmation of the identity of the recombinant proteins (Fig. 4).


Fig. 3. Immunoaffinity purification of p50. Recombinant p50 expressed using the pTACTAC vector was purified by immunoaffinity chromatography on immobilized antibody 13D5 as described under "Experimental Procedures." An SDS-PAGE gel was stained with Coomassie Blue. The lanes containing the protein standards are labeled S, the p50 preparation (4 µl) after 50% ammonium sulfate precipitation is labeled C, and p50 (15 µl) after immunoaffinity chromatography purification is labeled A.
[View Larger Version of this Image (51K GIF file)]


Fig. 4. Comparison of expression of p50 using the pET21a and pTACTAC vectors. Lane 1 represents p50 overexpressed in pET (6 M urea extract). Lane 2 represents p50 overexpressed in pTACTAC vector (50% ammonium sulfate fraction). Lane 3 represents immunoaffinity-purified calf thymus polymerase delta . The immunoblot was performed with a mixture of antibody 13D5 against p50 and antibody 78F5 against polymerase delta .
[View Larger Version of this Image (31K GIF file)]

The abilities of the p50 expressed in the pTACTAC vector as a soluble protein and of the renatured p50 isolated after expression in the pET vector to affect pol delta  activity were compared (Fig. 5). The two proteins were essentially indistinguishable in their behavior. These results show that the procedure used for renaturation of the insoluble p50 results in a protein that is functionally similar to the protein expressed in a soluble state. The recombinant pol delta  p125 activity was stimulated about 2-fold by the addition of p50. The combined effect of p50 and PCNA provided about a 5-fold stimulation of the free p125 activity. Because of concerns that the small effects of the p50 on the pol delta  activity were nonspecific, recombinant p50 was heat-denatured. This heat-treated p50 and BSA were used as negative controls (Fig. 6). Examination of their effects as a function of added protein and time showed that the heat-denatured protein had no significant effects when compared with untreated p50 and that the increase in activity is not due to a stabilization of the p125 subunit by the addition of protein to the solution (Fig. 6).


Fig. 5. Effects of renatured and soluble recombinant p50 on pol delta  activity. The abilities of renatured p50 originating as the insoluble recombinant protein and of recombinant p50 expressed in the soluble state to stimulate pol delta  were compared. Both proteins were purified as described under "Experimental Procedures." Results were expressed as relative activities with p125 activity alone as 100%. Solid bars, data obtained with renatured p50. Lined bars, data obtained with purified p50 expressed in the soluble state in the pTACTAC vector.
[View Larger Version of this Image (28K GIF file)]


Fig. 6. The stimulation of p125 by p50 is specific. Assays were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." Immunoaffinity-purified p50 was heated at 100 °C for 5 min. The effects of purified p50 (solid circles), heat-treated p50 (open circles), and bovine serum albumin (open triangles) when added to the assay in the indicated amounts are shown in the left panel. Results are shown as relative activities. The right panel shows the time course of reaction for the addition of the same proteins at a concentration of 2 µg/assay. Results are shown as cpm of [3H]dTTP incorporated.
[View Larger Version of this Image (21K GIF file)]

Interaction of the Pol delta  p125 and p50 Subunits

The physical interaction of p50 with pol delta  p125 was demonstrated by an ELISA procedure (Fig. 7). When the plates were coated with p50 and the response was tested by the addition of p125 and a p125 antibody, a concentration dependence of absorbance could be detected. Similar results were obtained from the reciprocal experiment, in which p125 was bound to the ELISA plates and probed with p50 and a p50 antibody (Fig. 7). These results establish that recombinant p50 does interact with p125.


Fig. 7. Demonstration of the interaction of p50 with the p125 subunit of pol delta  by ELISA. Left panel, p50 was immobilized on ELISA plates, and varying amounts of p125 protein were added as indicated. Binding of p125 to p50 was then monitored by ELISA assays using a monoclonal antibody against p125 (7B7) and a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (see "Experimental Procedures"). Right panel, recombinant p125 (kDa) was immobilized on ELISA plates, and varying amounts of recombinant p50 were added as indicated to the right (in kDa). Binding of p50 to p125 was then monitored by ELISA assays using a monoclonal antibody against p50 (17D2) and a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (see "Experimental Procedures").
[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]

Generation of Monoclonal Antibodies to p50

Monoclonal antibodies to p50 were generated (see "Experimental Procedures"). The p50 protein obtained by extraction from inclusion bodies and purified by gel filtration in 2 M urea was used as the antigen, and hybridomas were screened by the ability of their cell supernatants to immunoblot the p50 subunit of calf thymus pol delta  isolated by immunoaffinity chromatography (17). Seven stable hybridoma cell lines were selected and established, all of which produced monoclonal antibodies that strongly immunoblotted p50. The monoclonal antibodies were typed as to their immunoglobulin class by the Ouchterlony double-diffusion technique (20). Three antibodies were of the IgG1 class (12B6, 16A8, and 17D2), two were of the IgG2b class (13D3 and 13D5), one was an IgG2a (13D8), and one was IgG3 (13E6). All of the monoclonal antibodies were able to co-immunoprecipitate the p125 subunit of pol delta  from HeLa cell extracts. This is illustrated in Fig. 8, in which HeLa extracts were immunoprecipitated with 13D5 (p50) monoclonal antibody and then immunoblotted with a pol delta  monoclonal antibody (38B5). The effects of these monoclonal antibodies on the activity of pol delta  core purified from calf thymus by immunoaffinity chromatography was examined. Only one antibody, 13D5, was found to be inhibitory (Fig. 9). This inhibitory antibody did not inhibit the 3'-5'-exonuclease activity of pol delta  isolated from the calf thymus (not shown). None of the antibodies inhibited the polymerase activity of the recombinant pol delta  p125 overexpressed in the Sf9 cells.


Fig. 8. Immunoprecipitation of HeLa cell extract using p50 monoclonal antibodies. HeLa cell extracts were immunoprecipitated as described under "Experimental Procedures" and then subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with a monoclonal antibody against pol delta  p125 (78F5). Lane 1, immunoprecipitate obtained with monoclonal antibody 13D5 against p50. Lane 2, control with no antibody used. Lane 3, immunoprecipitate using control monoclonal antibody 12B1 (non-reactive with p50). Lane 4, immunoprecipitate using antibody 78F5 against pol delta  p125. Lane 5, no antibody used. Lane S, protein standards.
[View Larger Version of this Image (31K GIF file)]


Fig. 9. Inhibition of pol delta  activity by p50 monoclonal antibodies. Immunoaffinity-purified calf thymus pol delta  core-purified as described by Jiang et al. (17) was incubated with increasing amounts of purified p50 monoclonal antibodies. After 4 h, 10 µl of the mixture was assayed for DNA polymerase activity using poly(dA)·oligo(dT) as a template in the presence of 500 ng of recombinant PCNA. Data are shown as % inhibition of a control with no added antibody: 13D5 (solid squares), 12B6 (solid inverted triangles), 16A8 (crosses), 17D2 (open squares), 13D8 (solid circles), 13D3 (solid triangles), and 13E6 (solid diamonds).
[View Larger Version of this Image (16K GIF file)]

Monoclonal antibody 13D5 was found to be suitable for the preparation of an immunoaffinity support for the isolation of p50. The purified protein was coupled to AvidChrom hydrazide as described by Jiang et al. (17). The column was useful for the isolation of recombinant p50 expressed as a soluble protein in E. coli (see above). This column also allowed the isolation of pol delta  from calf thymus extracts (Fig. 10).


Fig. 10. Immunoaffinity purification of pol delta  using immobilized antibody 13D5. The p50 monoclonal antibody, 13D5, was immobilized on AvidChrom hydrazide support (see "Experimental Procedures"). A partially purified calf thymus preparation (50 ml) after the phenyl-agarose chromatography step (17) was loaded onto a 5-ml immunoaffinity column. The column was washed with 50 ml of TGEE buffer containing 0.1 M NaCl. The column was eluted with TGEE buffer containing 0.5 M NaCl, and fractions were then collected and assayed for pol delta  activity (solid circles). Inset, immunoblots of fractions 3, 4, and 5 with a mixture of monoclonal antibodies against p50 (13D5) and p125 (78F5).
[View Larger Version of this Image (35K GIF file)]


DISCUSSION

Mammalian DNA polymerase delta  is a heterodimer consisting of a catalytic subunit of 125 kDa and a small subunit of 50 kDa (6, 7, 17). Reports of pol delta  preparations consisting of the free pol delta  catalytic subunits from rabbit reticulocytes (8), mouse (9), and Drosophila (21) supported the possibility that the presence of p50 is required for PCNA sensitivity of the catalytic subunit. The pol delta  catalytic subunits of both yeast (10) and mammalian p125 (11) have been overexpressed and exhibit only a slight response to PCNA. Highly purified human placental pol delta  preparations purified by conventional means are stimulated at least 10-20-fold and may reach above 30-fold depending on the assay conditions (7, 11). In the studies reported here, we find that the p125 subunit of pol delta  overexpressed in baculovirus is stimulated by PCNA less than 2-fold. Thus, our findings are consistent with other reports on the behavior of the isolated p125 subunit in regard to either a lack of, or a low level of, sensitivity to PCNA. However, in the presence of p50 pol delta  activity is stimulated about 5-fold by PCNA suggesting that the 50-kDa subunit is required for the stimulation of DNA polymerase delta  by PCNA.

The effects of p50 on recombinant p125 are small, and the failure to induce a strong PCNA sensitivity suggests that the reconstitution of a native enzyme was not achieved. Nevertheless, there clearly is an interaction between the two recombinant proteins based on the functional effects of p50 on p125, and the demonstration of a protein-protein interaction via the ELISA system. Several reasons for the failure to observe a high level of PCNA responsiveness are possible. First, either one of the recombinant proteins could be improperly folded or lacking in a required post-translational modification. Second, the proper folding of both proteins may require their co-expression or may require the action of specific chaperone proteins. Third, the formation of the core enzyme may require the presence of other subunits. With regard to the first issue, we have characterized recombinant p50 to confirm that it behaves as a globular protein based on its physicochemical properties and by comparison of its functional effects on pol delta  p125 with that of a soluble form of p50 isolated by expression in the pTACTAC vector. At the present time it is not known if p50 is subject to post-translational modification, although we have preliminary evidence that p50 is phosphorylated in vitro.2 With regard to the second issue, one possible avenue would be to co-express the two proteins in the baculovirus system. It should be noted that our attempts at separation of the two subunits from the native enzyme were unsuccessful and could only be achieved after denaturation of the complex, which showed that their interaction was extremely strong. Alternatively, the low level of PCNA responsiveness could be due to a situation where only a small fraction of p125 is reconstituted with p50.

It seems unlikely that p50 fulfills a simple structural role in maintaining pol delta  function, based on studies of yeast genes that encode p50 homologues. A BLAST search of the p50 protein sequence against the GenBankTM data base showed that it has significant identity with a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene, HYS2, which encodes a protein of 487 residues corresponding to a molecular mass of 55 kDa (22). Alignment of the protein sequences shows that there is a 34% identity between human p50 and the Hys2 protein so that the latter is a likely candidate for the yeast counterpart of the mammalian p50 subunit of pol delta . Genetic analysis of the HYS2 gene (22) showed that it is essential for DNA replication in S. cerevisiae. Additionally, HYS2 mutants display supersensitivity to hydroxyurea, increased levels of mitotic chromosome loss, and recombination. More recently, MacNeill et al. (23) cloned a Schizosaccharomyces pombe gene, cdc1+, which displays significant sequence identity (34%) to both the p50 subunit of pol delta  and to HYS2. A physical interaction of the Cdc1 protein with the yeast pol delta  protein was demonstrated by in vitro co-immunoprecipitation. Thus, genetic studies have pointed to an important requirement for the pol delta  small subunit in yeast, since cdc1 and HYS2 mutations lead to defective DNA synthesis and/or repair as well as hypersensitivity to hydroxyurea and methyl methane sulfonate. Cellular recognition of these defects in replicated DNA leads to the abnormalities in cell cycle progression 22, 23).

The findings in both budding and fission yeast that genetic screens for genes required for cell cycle progression have yielded genes encoding the small subunit of pol delta  are highly indicative of an important function for this subunit. The p50 subunit could be critical in providing for the interaction of pol delta  with other replication proteins, or it may be that regulation of pol delta  may be mediated through p50. This function may also involve the interaction of the small subunit of pol delta  with another protein which is encoded by cdc27+, another gene that is required for cell cycle progression (23). It was demonstrated that cdc1+ overexpression is able to rescue mutants of cdc27+ and that the gene product of cdc27 + interacts with the Cdc1 protein. In the mammalian system, no counterpart of the Cdc27 protein has been reported, although as noted by MacNeill et al. (23), its association with the core enzyme might not survive the multiple chromatography steps required for its purification. In this regard, it may be noted that during the immunoaffinity purification of pol delta  from calf thymus (17), there is a persistent appearance of a polypeptide of 40 kDa. Further investigation will be required to determine the functional role of p50 as well as the identification and isolation of the proteins that interact with p50. The availability of overexpressed p50 as well as the antibodies which we have characterized may be useful tools for these studies.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM31973 and National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Grant ES07634 (to M. Y. W. T. L.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    To whom correspondence should be addressed: Depts. of Biochemistry Molecular Biology and Medicine, P. O. Box 016960 (R-57), University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33101. Tel.: 305-243-4047; Fax: 305-243-3955.
1   The abbreviations used are: pol, polymerase; PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen; BSA, bovine serum albumin; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; DTT, dithiothreitol; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography.

REFERENCES

  1. Yang, C. L., Zhang, S. J., Toomey, N. L., Palmer, T. N., and Lee, M. Y. W. T. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 7536-7541
  2. Zeng, X.-R., Jiang, Y., Zhang, S.-J., Hao, H., and Lee, M. Y. W. T. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 13748-13751 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Prelich, G., Tan, C. K., Kostura, M., Mathews, M. B., So, A. G., Downey, K. M., and Stillman, B. (1987) Nature 326, 517-520 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Yao, N., Turner, J., Kelman, Z., Stukenberg, P. T., Dean, F., Shechter, D., Pan, Z. Q., Hurwitz, J., and O'Donnell, M. (1996) Genes Cells 1, 101-113 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Waga, S., and Stillman, B. (1994) Nature 369, 207-212 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Lee, M. Y. W. T., Tan, C.-K., Downey, K. M., and So, A. G. (1984) Biochemistry 23, 1906-1913 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Lee, M. Y. W. T., Jiang, Y., Zhang, S. J., and Toomey, N. L. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 2423-2429 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Goscin, L. P., and Byrnes, J. J. (1982) Biochemistry 21, 2518-2524 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Goulian, M., Herrmann, S. M., Sackett, J. W., and Grimm, S. L. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 16402-16411 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Brown, W. C., and Campbell, J. L. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 21706-21710 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Zhang, P., Frugulhetti, I., Jiang, Y., Holt, G. L., Condit, R. C., and Lee, M. Y. W. T. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 7993-7998 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Zhang, J., Tan, C. K., McMullen, B., Downey, K. M., and So, A. G. (1995) Genomics 29, 179-186 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Browner, M. F., Rasor, P., Tugendreich, S., and Fletterick, R. J. (1991) Protein Eng. 4, 351-357 [Abstract]
  14. Zhang, Z., Bai, G., Deans-Zirattu, S., Browner, M. F., and Lee, E. Y. C. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 1484-1490 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Zhang, P., Zhang, S. J., Zhang, Z., Woessner, F., and Lee, M. Y. W. T. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 10703-10712 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Lee, M. Y. W. T., Alejandro, R., and Toomey, N. L. (1989) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 272, 1-9 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Jiang, Y., Zhang, S. J., Wu, S. M., and Lee, M. Y. W. T. (1995) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 320, 297-304 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Dornreiter, I., Copeland, W. C., and Wang, T. S. F. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 809-820 [Abstract]
  19. Lee, S. S., Dong, Q., Wang, T. S. F., and Lehman, I. R. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 7882-7886 [Abstract]
  20. Harlow, E., and Lane, D. (1988) Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, pp. 232-233, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, NY
  21. Chiang, C. S., Mitsis, P. G., and Lehman, I. R. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 9105-9109 [Abstract]
  22. Sugimoto, K., Sakamoto, Y., Takahashi, O., and Matsumoto, K. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 3493-3500 [Abstract]
  23. MacNeill, S. A., Moreno, S., Reynolds, N., Nurse, P., and Fantes, P. A. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 4613-4628 [Abstract]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.