Studies on the Site and Mechanism of Attachment of Phosphorylcholine to a Filarial Nematode Secreted Glycoprotein*

(Received for publication, March 20, 1996, and in revised form, September 30, 1996)

Katrina M. Houston , William Cushley Dagger and William Harnett §

From the Department of Immunology, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 ONR and Dagger  Division of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

We have recently shown that the immunomodulatory substance phosphorylcholine (PC) is covalently attached to ES-62, a major secreted protein of the filarial nematode parasite Acanthocheilonema viteae, via an N-linked glycan. Linkage of PC to N-glycans is previously unreported, and hence we have investigated the biochemical events underlying it. PC addition was found by pulse-chase experiments to be a fairly early event during intracellular transport, occurring within 40-60 min of protein synthesis. Biosynthetic labeling/immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that addition of PC to ES-62 was blocked by (i) brefeldin A, an inhibitor of trafficking of newly synthesized proteins from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the Golgi, (ii) 1-deoxynorijirimycin, an inhibitor of glucosidase activity in the ER, and (iii) 1-deoxymannojirimycin, an inhibitor of mannosidase I in the cis Golgi. Swainsonine, an inhibitor of mannosidase II in the medial Golgi, did not affect PC addition. Taken together these data indicate that PC attachment is a post-ER event which is dependent on generation of an appropriate substrate during oligosaccharide processing. Furthermore, they strongly suggest that PC addition takes place in the medial Golgi and that the substrate for addition is the 3-linked branch of Man5GlcNAc3 or Man3GLcNAc3.


INTRODUCTION

Filarial nematodes are arthropod-transmitted parasites of vertebrates. Of the eight species that infect humans, three, Wuchereria bancrofti, Brugia malayi, and Onchocerca volvulus, are of major medical importance. The former two parasites inhabit the lymphatics, where they are associated with a number of pathological conditions, the most important of which is elephantiasis. O. volvulus resides in subcutaneous tissues, where it is relatively benign. However, larval forms (microfilariae) released by adult female worms migrate continuously through the skin and may cause chronic debilitating lesions. Furthermore, the microfilariae may invade the eye, invoking a number of pathological changes, and ultimately causing blindness. It is currently estimated that there are almost 150 million people infected with these parasites in the tropics, and a further 1,000 million at risk (1).

Filarial nematodes release a number of proteins into their environment. A rather unusual characteristic of many of these proteins is that they contain phosphorylcholine (PC)1 in apparent covalent association (reviewed in Ref. 2). The function of this PC on secreted proteins has yet to be unequivocally established, but it is likely that it plays a role in interfering with the ability of the host immune system to respond to the worm. It has recently been shown, for example, that PC-containing antigens of B. malayi can inhibit phytohemagglutinin-induced proliferation of human T-cells (3), and ES-62, a major PC-containing secreted protein of the rodent filarial parasite Acanthocheilonema viteae (4), is able to inhibit polyclonal murine B-cell proliferation induced by ligation of the antigen receptors (5). In both cases, the observed effect is confirmed as being due to PC, as it can be mimicked by PC bound to bovine serum albumin.

PC is also found on a number of nonsecreted proteins of filarial nematodes, where its function is unknown. It appears to be particularly abundant within the uterus and digestive tract (6), but the significance of this is uncertain. PC is a component of teichoic acids in the cell wall (7) and lipoteichoic acids in the cell membrane (8) of certain species of Gram-positive bacteria, where it appears to play a crucial role in the maintenance of normal cell shape and physiology (9). Whether related roles exist with respect to filarial nematodes remains to be established. Certainly, the mechanism of attachment of PC is similar in both groups of organisms, in that it involves linkage to carbohydrate (10-11). The same appears to be true of PC found in fungi (12).

Recently we have observed that attachment of PC to ES-62 is via a glycan of the N-type. This conclusion is based on the findings that PC and glycan groups are both lost following exposure of ES-62 to N-glycosidase F (11) and absent following culture of A. viteae in the presence of tunicamycin (13). The attachment of PC to an N-type glycan is a previously unreported finding, and hence we are interested in elucidating the biosynthetic mechanisms involved. Such information could be of therapeutic value as synthesis of PC-glycans may represent an urgently required (particularly with respect to O. volvulus) novel target for chemotherapy in filarial infections.

This article describes three approaches to gaining information on how attachment of PC to an N-type glycan is achieved. They each rely on the fact that newly synthesized glycoproteins, which are destined for secretion, follow a fixed route through the cell prior to exit (reviewed in Ref. 14). The three approaches are as follows. (i) Pulse-chase time course experiments in combination with immunoprecipitation analysis are used to investigate how soon after synthesis of ES-62 PC is attached. This should indicate whether addition is an early or late event during intracellular trafficking. (ii) Brefeldin A, an inhibitor of intracellular trafficking from the ER to the Golgi, is employed (reviewed in Ref. 15). Use of this reagent may pinpoint addition of PC to one of these two subcellular locations. (iii) Inhibitors of oligosaccharide processing are used (reviewed in Ref. 16). N-Type glycans of newly synthesized glycoproteins undergo a series of trimming/addition steps during trafficking. Inhibitors of oligosaccharide processing are available that block the action of individual processing enzymes, each of which has a characteristic glycan substrate specificity and subcellular location.

In combination, these three approaches should help establish when, where, and to what PC is added during trafficking of ES-62.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

The Parasite

Jirds (Meriones libycus) were infected by subcutaneous injection of A. viteae 3rd stage larvae recovered from infected ticks (Ornithodorus moubata) (17). Adult parasites were recovered following direct visual examination of the skin and underlying body surfaces of jirds. The worms were transferred to Petri dishes containing RPMI "complete" medium (RPMI 1640 with added glucose (1% w/v), glutamic acid (2 mM), penicillin (100 units/ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml) and buffered at pH 7.0 with 20 mM Hepes).

Time Course of Synthesis of ES-62

Groups of three adult female A. viteae were cultured overnight at 37 °C in 10 ml of methionine-free RPMI complete medium, in an atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% air. The medium was removed and replaced with 2 ml of the same containing 0.74 MBq L-[35S]methionine (37 TBq/mmol; Amersham Int., Amersham Place, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire HP7 9NA, UK). After 15 min, the labeling medium was removed and replaced with 10 ml of RPMI complete medium. A chase was then allowed to proceed for defined time periods, before worms were employed for preparation of parasite whole worm extracts ("cell extract"). One group of female worms was also cultured as above for preparation of secreted proteins ("secreted extract"). 15 min after pulsing, the medium was removed and replaced with 5 ml of RPMI complete medium. This was repeated at various time points and then all recovered media was employed for secreted extract preparation.

Preparation of Parasite Whole Worm ("Cell") Extract

This was essentially undertaken as described previously (18). Briefly, worms were extensively homogenized in 1 ml of PBS, pH 7.2, in the presence of the proteinase inhibitors Nalpha -p-tosyl-L-lysine chloromethyl ketone (50 µg/ml), N-tosyl-L-phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone (50 µg/ml), and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (1 mM). Inhibitors were obtained from Sigma, Poole, Dorset, UK. The samples were then centrifuged (20,000 × g for 25 min), and the supernatant was retained. Worm extracts (cell extract) were stored at -20 °C.

Preparation of Secreted Extract

Spent culture medium was filtered using a 0.22-µm membrane (Sigma) to remove microfilariae released by adult female worms. It was then concentrated using Centriprep tubes with a 30-kDa cut-off membrane (Amicon Ltd., Upper Mill, Stonehouse, Gloucestershire GL10 2BJ, UK). A further concentration step (to 100-150 µl) was then undertaken using Centricon microconcentrators, again with a 30-kDa membrane. These were also employed to "wash" the samples with PBS, pH 7.2. The final volume of all of the samples was adjusted to 200 µl, and they were stored at -20 °C.

Measurement of Trichloroacetic Acid-precipitable Radioactivity

This was undertaken essentially as described previously (18). Briefly, two 10-µl aliquots of radiolabeled secreted extract were subjected to trichloroacetic acid precipitation using 10% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid containing 10 mM methionine, and the mean value was determined. Determination of radioactivity was undertaken using an LKB Wallac 1217 Rackbeta liquid scintillation counter.

SDS-PAGE/Fluorography

Samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE, using a Bio-Rad electrophoresis cell according to the manufacturer's instructions. 10% (w/v) acrylamide gels were employed, and 2-mercaptoethanol was used for reduction of samples. 14C-Labeled molecular weight markers (Amersham Corp.) were also run to allow molecular weight estimations. Gels were treated with the fluorographic reagent AMPLIFY (Amersham Corp.) before exposure to pre-flashed x-ray film (Hyperfilm-MP, Amersham Corp.) and storage at -70 °C.

Immunoprecipitation

Radiolabeled sample (10 µl; ~1-5,000 dpm) was added to 5 µl of either rabbit antiserum raised against purified ES-62 (anti-ES-62 (4)), 5 µl of normal rabbit serum, or 5 µl of TEPC 15 (1 mg/ml, Sigma), a mouse IgA myeloma protein designated as having specificity for PC based on the finding that PC inhibits its binding to PC-containing molecules such as pneumococcus C polysaccharide (related compounds, glycerophosphorylcholine, phosphonocholine, choline, are all inferior to PC in this respect, suggesting that PC represents the true specificity) (19), plus 5 µl of normal mouse serum. PBS, pH 7.2, was added to a final volume of 100 µl, and samples were incubated with gentle agitation for 1 h at 37 °C. An appropriate concentration of either goat anti-rabbit Ig serum or goat anti-mouse IgA and goat anti-mouse Ig (equal volumes) was added, and samples were incubated with gentle agitation for 1 h at 37 °C and then left overnight at 4 °C to allow precipitates to form. Precipitates were washed (3 ×) with ice-cold 10 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM NaCl, 0.1% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, pH 8.3, and then subjected to analysis by SDS-PAGE/fluorography.

Culture of Worms with Brefeldin A

Three adult female A. viteae were placed in a test tube containing 5 ml of methionine-free RPMI complete medium and brefeldin A at a concentration of 1 µg/ml. A control (no brefeldin A) was also set up. Worms were incubated for 2.0 h at 37 °C. The medium in each case was removed and replaced with the same but containing 2.0 MBq of L-[35S]methionine. Following 1 h, 20 ml of RPMI complete medium containing brefeldin A (1 µg/ml) was added. Following overnight incubation the medium was removed and secreted, and cell extracts were prepared as described above. These were then subjected to trichloroacetic acid precipitation and in some cases immunoprecipitation/SDS-PAGE. In some experiments, L-[35S]methionine was replaced with [methyl-3H]choline chloride (3.7 MBq; 2. 78 TBq/mmol, Amersham) and methionine-free medium, replaced with choline-free. In these experiments, the preincubation period was increased to 16 h, to optimize the incorporation of [3H]choline into ES-62, and the experiments were terminated after a 60-min chase period for preparation of parasite cell extracts for analysis by SDS-PAGE.

Culture of Worms with Inhibitors of N-Linked Oligosaccharide Processing

Adult female A. viteae were divided into groups of three, placed in test tubes containing 5 ml of methionine-free RPMI complete medium, and one of the following then added: 1-deoxymannojirimycin hydrochloride (dMM), 1-deoxynorijirimycin (dNM), swainsonine (Boehringer Mannheim, UK). dMM and dNM were employed at a concentration of 1 mM and swainsonine at 50 µg/ml. A control (no reagent) was also set up and also a sample in which worms were exposed to brefeldin A. Worms were incubated for 2 h at 37 °C, and the media were removed and then replaced with identical media supplemented with 2 MBq of [35S]methionine. After 1 h, 20 ml of RPMI complete medium containing the appropriate inhibitor was added. Following overnight incubation, the medium was removed, and secreted extracts were prepared as described above. The extracts were then subjected to immunoprecipitation followed by SDS-PAGE/fluorography. In some experiments, [35S]methionine was replaced with [3H]choline or D-[6-3H]glucosamine hydrochloride (1.11 TBq/mmol; Amersham Corp.), and methionine-free medium was replaced with choline-free or medium containing only 10% (w/v) normal glucose levels (to promote uptake of radiolabeled glucosamine). In these experiments, the preincubation period was increased to 16 h when employing [3H]choline as label, and the chase period was reduced to 60 min when preparing cell extracts.

Exposure of Swainsonine-treated ES-62 to Endoglycosidase H/Galanthus nivalis Agglutinin

Adult A. viteae were exposed to swainsonine, or no inhibitor as control, as described above but under conditions designed to produce nonradioactive secreted extract. Swainsonine-treated and control-purified secreted extracts (0.5-µg aliquots) were incubated with endoglycosidase H (Boehringer Mannheim Biochemica) or no enzyme as a control as described previously (20). 100-ng aliquots were resolved by SDS-PAGE and then probed for reactivity for Galanthus nivalis agglutinin using a digoxigenin-based glycan differentiation kit (Boehringer Mannheim Biochemica) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The lectin is digoxigenin-labeled: the indicator system is an anti-digoxigenin antibody linked to alkaline phosphatase, with nitro blue tetrazolium/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate being employed as substrate.

Gel Filtration of Radiolabeled ES-62 following Exposure to N-Glycosidase F

10 µl of either [3H]glucosamine or [3H]choline-labeled ES-62 was subjected to digestion using N-glycosidase F as described previously (11). Loss of both radiolabels from the protein was confirmed by analysis of one-tenth volume of each reaction (1 µl of original radiolabeled samples) by SDS-PAGE. The remainder of each sample was made up to 200 µl and individually passed through a column (20 × 1 cm) containing Bio-Gel P-2 gel according to the manufacturer's instructions (Bio-Rad). A series of 300-µl fractions were collected and examined for radioactivity using an LKB Wallac 1217 Rackbeta liquid scintillation counter.


RESULTS

Phosphorylcholine Is in Covalent Association with an N-Type Glycan Attached to ES-62

It has previously been demonstrated that PC is removed from ES-62 by N-glycosidase F (11) and absent from ES-62 produced by worms cultured in tunicamycin (13). The logical conclusion from these data is that PC is covalently attached to ES-62 via an N-type glycan. This is further supported by (i) the observation that the [3H]choline-labeled products of ES-62 exposed to N-glycosidase F migrated within the area occupied by released [3H]glucosamine-labeled N-type glycans during gel filtration (Fig. 1); and (ii) radiolabeled choline cannot be displaced from ES-62 by incubation in high concentrations of nonradioactive choline or phosphorylcholine, and likewise radiolabeled choline does not interact with nonradiolabeled ES-62 (results not shown).


Fig. 1. Separation of radiolabeled products of biosynthetically labeled ES-62 following exposure to N-glycosidase F by gel filtration. [3H]Choline and [3H]glucosamine-labeled ES-62 were individually exposed to N-glycosidase F, and the reaction products were subjected to gel filtration using Bio-Gel P-2 gel. A series of 300-µl fractions were collected, and the radioactivity of each was then measured. The position of migration of a protein standard (hemoglobin) is also shown.
[View Larger Version of this Image (13K GIF file)]


Pulse-Chase Analysis of Time of Addition of PC

The aim of this approach was to elucidate when PC is attached to ES-62 during its synthesis, processing, and transport prior to secretion. Groups of adult worms were pulsed with [35S]methionine for 15 min and then secreted, and cell extracts were prepared from parasites subjected to chase for a series of periods. Examination of the trichloroacetic acid-precipitable radioactivity in the secreted extracts indicated that radiolabeled protein first appears in the culture medium within 2-3 h of the initiation of the chase period and that secretion of labeled protein has virtually ceased by 5 h (Fig. 2). Examination of the radiolabeled material by SDS-PAGE/fluorography indicated that, as previously established for A. viteae ES (4), it is almost entirely ES-62 (not shown). We therefore subjected cell extracts obtained from worms subjected to chase for various periods to immunoprecipitation using anti-ES-62 or anti-PC (TEPC 15). Analysis of the immunoprecipitates by SDS-PAGE/fluorography indicated that the labeled protein could be detected faintly as a sharp band at the beginning of the chase period (Fig. 3A, zero time point). Synthesis therefore occurs rapidly under these in vitro conditions, a result consistent with the rate of synthesis observed for the surface/ES product, GP29, from the related parasite, B. malayi (21). ES-62 was more clearly detected, and as a more diffuse band, after 20 min of the chase period (Fig. 3A). The more diffuse appearance is likely to be due to glycosylation, although the presence of large amounts of immunoglobulin heavy chain (molecular mass 50-65 kDa) in the immunoprecipitates may interfere with the normal migration of ES-62 and hence cause it to appear more diffuse. Radiolabeled ES-62 can no longer be detected in cell extracts after 2-3 h (Fig. 3A), a result consistent with its appearance in the medium at this time (Fig. 2). The specificity of the immunoprecipitation reaction is shown in Fig. 3B; replacement of anti-ES-62 with normal rabbit serum results in loss of detection of the major band of molecular mass 62 kDa seen at the 60-min time point in Fig. 3A. PC attachment to ES-62 was clearly detected after 60 min of chase, as judged by immunoprecipitation employing TEPC 15 (Fig. 3C). Employment of a control antibody to demonstrate TEPC 15 specificity is not necessary as the antibody does not bind ES-62 shown by biosynthetic radiolabeling to lack PC (see Figs. 7B and Fig. 8). The increase in intensity of ES-62 demonstrated between the 40- and 60-min time points in Fig. 3A may also be consistent with the majority of pulse-labeled ES-62 undergoing PC attachment at this point, as the polyclonal anti-ES-62 reagent contains a strong element of anti-PC activity (4). Taken together, these results suggest that PC is attached to ES-62 within 40-60 min of synthesis of the protein.


Fig. 2. Trichloroacetic acid-precipitable radioactivity in culture medium following pulsing of adult female A. viteae with [35S]methionine. Spent culture media were collected at various time points (0, 1, 2, 3, and 5 h) following a 15-min chase period, washed/concentrated (to 200 µl), and trichloroacetic acid-precipitable radioactivity measured. Values represent the mean of two 10-µl samples.
[View Larger Version of this Image (13K GIF file)]



Fig. 3. Immunoprecipitation/SDS-PAGE analysis of 35S-labeled whole worm (cell) extracts obtained following pulse-chase analysis. Adult A. viteae were pulsed for 15 min with [35S]methionine, and cell extracts were prepared at various time points thereafter. The extracts were subjected to immunoprecipitation analysis using anti-ES-62 (A), normal rabbit serum (B), or TEPC 15 (C), and samples were then analyzed by SDS-PAGE/fluorography. An arrow is employed to indicate the presence of ES-62 in A and C. The distances migrated by radiolabeled molecular weight standards are shown on the left of each panel.
[View Larger Version of this Image (31K GIF file)]



Fig. 7. Immunoprecipitation/SDS-PAGE analysis of [35S]methionine-labeled secreted extracts following culture of adult A. viteae with inhibitors of oligosaccharide processing. Adult A.viteae were cultured with [35S]methionine in the presence of no inhibitor (lane a), brefeldin A (lane b), dNM (lane c), dMM (lane d), and swainsonine (lane e). Secreted extracts were prepared and subjected to immunoprecipitation using anti-ES-62 (A) or TEPC 15 (B), followed by SDS-PAGE/fluorography. The distances migrated by radiolabeled molecular weight standards are shown on the left.
[View Larger Version of this Image (31K GIF file)]


Effect of Brefeldin A on Addition of PC to ES-62

Preliminary experiments (results not shown) indicated that parasites cultured in the presence of [35S]methionine and brefeldin A at a concentration of 1 µg/ml demonstrated an almost total block on secretion (<5% of control) but a normal level of protein biosynthesis (>95% of control) as measured by trichloroacetic acid-precipitable radioactivity in secreted and cell extracts, respectively. Immunoprecipitation analysis employing anti-ES-62 revealed as expected the presence of ES-62 in secreted samples prepared from control worms (Fig. 4, track c) but not brefeldin-A treated (Fig. 4, track d) samples. The antiserum was also employed to examine a cell extract prepared from control and brefeldin A-treated worms. ES-62 was recognized in both extracts but was clearly more abundant in the brefeldin A-treated extract (Fig. 4, track b). This observation is again consistent with retention of ES-62 in brefeldin A-treated worms. The retained ES-62 was found to largely lack PC, however, as demonstrated when [3H]choline was employed to biosynthetically label ES-62 in control and brefeldin A-treated cell extracts (Fig. 5). The amount of radiolabeled protein as a whole in the extract prepared from worms exposed to brefeldin A (track b) is in fact drastically reduced relative to the control (track a). Clearly, therefore, brefeldin A causes major inhibition of attachment of PC to parasite proteins including ES-62.


Fig. 4. Immunoprecipitation/SDS-PAGE analysis of 35S-labeled A. viteae secreted and cell extracts following culture in the presence of brefeldin A. Adult A. viteae were cultured with [35S]methionine in the absence (lanes a and c) or presence (lanes b and d) of brefeldin A. Cell (lanes a and b) and secreted (lanes c and d) extracts were prepared and subjected to immunoprecipitation analysis using anti-ES-62. Immunoprecipitates were examined by SDS-PAGE/fluorography. The distances migrated by radiolabeled molecular weight standards are shown on the left.
[View Larger Version of this Image (60K GIF file)]



Fig. 5. SDS-PAGE analysis of [3H]choline-labeled cell extract following culture of adult A. viteae in the presence of brefeldin A. Adult A. viteae were cultured with [3H]choline in the absence (lane a) or presence (lane b) of brefeldin A, and cell extracts were prepared and analyzed by SDS-PAGE/fluorography. The distances migrated by radiolabeled molecular weight standards are shown on the left.
[View Larger Version of this Image (33K GIF file)]


Effect of Inhibitors of Oligosaccharide Processing on Addition of PC to ES-62

The aim of this approach was to disrupt processing of N-linked oligosaccharides in an attempt to prevent PC addition. Three different inhibitors of oligosaccharide processing were employed. For interruption of glucosidase I and II activities, the inhibitor dNM was used. For interruption of mannosidase I and mannosidase II activities, respectively, dMM and swainsonine were employed (for a detailed review of the properties of all three reagents, see Ref. 16). Adult A. viteae were cultured in the presence of inhibitors and [35S]methionine. Worms in all cases remained healthy (as judged by motility) throughout the culture period, although it was observed by measurement of trichloroacetic acid-precipitable radioactivity in the culture medium (not shown) that dNM virtually abolished protein secretion. Similar effects have been noted by other workers with respect to this reagent (reviewed in Ref. 16).

Adult A. viteae were cultured in the presence of [3H]choline or [3H]glucosamine plus dNM, and cell extracts were prepared and examined by SDS-PAGE/fluorography. This clearly indicated that exposure to dNM prevented attachment of PC to ES-62, as the parasite product can be detected when [3H]glucosamine, but not [3H]choline, is employed as radiolabel (cf. lane B, Fig. 6, A and B). Studies on other systems suggest that this result may be explained by a failure of ES-62 in dNM-treated worms to undergo normal intracellular transport. alpha 1-Antitrypsin, for example, accumulates in the rough ER of human hepatoma HepG2 cells following dNM treatment (22), and our data obtained when employing brefeldin A suggest that ES-62 must leave the ER to acquire PC. Another possibility which must be considered, however, is that PC addition may be dependent upon removal of glucose residues from the target N-glycan.


Fig. 6. SDS-PAGE analysis of [3H]glucosamine and [3H]choline-labeled cell extract following culture of adult A. viteae in the presence of dNM. Adult A. viteae were cultured with [3H]glucosamine (A) or [3H]choline (B) in the absence (lane a) or presence (lane b) of dNM, and cell extracts were prepared and analyzed by SDS-PAGE/fluorography. The distances migrated by radiolabeled molecular weight standards are shown on the left.
[View Larger Version of this Image (39K GIF file)]


Experiments employing dMM provided strong support for this latter suggestion. Immunoprecipitation analysis of [35S]methionine-labeled secreted ES-62, using anti-ES-62, as expected demonstrated recognition of the parasite product regardless of the inhibitor employed (the negative result with dNM is due to blockage of secretion) (Fig. 7A). When the antibody against the whole molecule was replaced with TEPC 15, however, binding was observed with samples obtained from worms exposed to swainsonine but was virtually abolished when using ES-62 obtained from worms cultured in dMM (Fig. 7B). To rule out the possibility that dMM may simply selectively block secretion of PC-containing ES-62 (not all ES-62 released may contain PC) rather than prevent PC addition, we examined the cell fractions prepared from control and dMM-treated worms by Western blotting. However, there was no evidence of retention of PC-containing ES-62 in the latter (result not shown). Furthermore, there was no evidence of degradation of ES-62 in dMM-treated samples; both samples contained ES-62, but the molecule lacked PC in the dMM-treated sample. These results therefore indicate that the steps in oligosaccharide processing up to the point at which dMM interferes are necessary for addition of PC. This was subsequently confirmed by SDS-PAGE/fluorography analysis of secreted material obtained from worms biosynthetically labeled using [3H]choline (Fig. 8). Interestingly, radiolabeled immunoprecipitates (using anti-ES-62) from dMM-treated worms give a higher signal than control worms, even allowing for their lack of PC (Fig. 7A). This may suggest that dMM increases secretion, a result consistent with measurement of trichloroacetic acid-precipitable radioactivity in the culture medium (not shown).


Fig. 8. SDS-PAGE analysis of [3H]choline-labeled secreted extracts following culture of A. viteae with inhibitors of oligosaccharide processing. Adult A. viteae were cultured with [3H]choline in the presence of no inhibitor (lane a), dMM (lane b), or swainsonine (lane c). Secreted extracts were prepared and subjected to SDS-PAGE/fluorography. The distances migrated by radiolabeled molecular weight standards are shown on the left.
[View Larger Version of this Image (35K GIF file)]


The results obtained with dMM and swainsonine suggest that addition of PC is dependent upon the action of mannosidase I but not mannosidase II. To ensure that this is the case, however, it was necessary to demonstrate that swainsonine is actually interfering with oligosaccharide processing in A. viteae (i.e. blocking mannosidase II activity) under the experimental conditions employed. This was achieved in two ways. (i) ES-62 has previously been shown to weakly bind the lectin G. nivalis agglutinin (20). This lectin recognizes terminal mannose, alpha (1-3), alpha (1-6), or alpha (1-2) linked to mannose (23). As swainsonine blocks removal of two such mannose residues, it would be expected that ES-62 prepared from worms exposed to swainsonine should show greater interaction with the lectin than control protein. As shown in Fig. 9 (cf. lanes B and D), much greater binding is indeed observed. (ii) N-Type glycans lose their sensitivity to endoglycosidase H, following processing from a Man5 to a Man4 structure (24). We have previously shown that PC-containing N-glycans are not cleaved from ES-62 by this enzyme (20), and the same is true of the glycan showing weak lectin binding (Fig. 9, lane C). If removal of Man4-5 is prevented by swainsonine, however, it might be predicted that glycan cleavage would take place. Again, as shown in Fig. 9, this is in fact the case as exposure of swainsonine-treated ES-62 to endoglycosidase H virtually abolishes lectin binding (Fig. 9, lane A). The same is also true of binding of TEPC 15 (result not shown).


Fig. 9. Binding of G. nivalis agglutinin to ES-62 produced in the presence of swainsonine and treated with endoglycosidase H. Lane a, ES-62 from swainsonine-treated worms and exposed to endoglycosidase H; lane b, swainsonine treated alone; lane c, control exposed to endoglycosidase H; lane d, control alone. Samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE prior to exposure to digoxigenin-labeled G. nivalis agglutinin. Detection is by anti-digoxigenin antibody coupled to alkaline phosphatase in combination with nitro blue tetrazolium/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate. The distances migrated by radiolabeled molecular weight standards are shown on the left.
[View Larger Version of this Image (43K GIF file)]



DISCUSSION

This article describes three approaches to examining addition of PC to ES-62, a major PC-containing secreted product of the rodent filarial nematode, A. viteae. The first approach was designed to investigate when PC is attached to ES-62, during intracellular transport. It was found that if worms were pulsed with [35S]methionine for 15 min, a further 2-3 h was required before labeled ES-62 was detected in the culture medium (Fig. 2). This represents a similar turnover rate to the major surface glycoprotein of related Brugia species, Gp29 (21), but is more rapid than the Brugia "ladder" protein, Gp15/400 (25). With respect to detecting radiolabeled ES-62 within whole worm (cell) extracts, this was possible by immunoprecipitation using anti-ES-62. A faint sharp band was observed on completion of the pulse period and a stronger diffuse band after a further 20 min (Fig. 3A). PC was detected on ES-62 by the immunoprecipitation procedure after 60 min of the chase period. Thus, if we accept that newly synthesized ES-62 does not appear until toward the end of the 15-min pulse period, we can infer that PC is probably added to ES-62 between 40 and 60 min postsynthesis. Based on studies with other proteins (26, 27), this suggests that addition is most likely to take place in the ER or Golgi rather than some later subcellular compartment. However, due to variation in the rate of exit of different proteins from the ER it is impossible to be more exact.

The second approach adopted was to investigate the effect of the inhibitor of intracellular trafficking, brefeldin A, on addition of PC to ES-62. ES-62 was readily detected within 35S-labeled cell extracts, by SDS-PAGE/immunoprecipitation employing anti-ES-62, in both control and brefeldin A-treated extracts (particularly the latter). When [3H]choline-labeled cell extracts were examined by SDS-PAGE, however, the intensity of the band detected in brefeldin A-treated extracts was considerably reduced relative to the control. Thus, brefeldin A inhibits addition of PC to ES-62. The primary effect of brefeldin A is considered to be blockage of transfer of protein-containing vesicles from the ER to the Golgi (28, 29), but it can also cause Golgi disintegration (15). Both of these previously described observations would favor the Golgi as the site of PC addition to ES-62.

The final approach adopted was utilization of inhibitors of oligosaccharide processing. One of the reagents employed, dNM, was found to block both secretion (Fig. 7) and PC addition (Fig. 6), properties common to brefeldin A (Figs. 4 and 5). Since dNM has been previously shown to interfere with transport of some proteins from the ER to the Golgi (22), it was considered that our results might reflect dNM acting in a similar manner to brefeldin A, i.e. blocking transport. However, it was observed that several molecules could be labeled with [3H]choline in the cell extract but that dNM unlike brefeldin A was only able to prevent this with respect to some of them. Thus if PC attachment is simply a consequence of being in the correct cellular compartment, then clearly only some of the proteins that can be radiolabeled must be prevented from leaving the ER by dNM treatment. However, we also had to consider that dNM will block oligosaccharide processing at a very early stage. This raised the alternative possibility that the ability of dNM to prevent PC attachment might be due to failure to create a critical substrate. Furthermore, studies with dMM were strongly supportive of this idea in that treatment of worms with this inhibitor led to the secretion of an ES product which lacked PC. The steps in oligosaccharide processing which dMM blocks (30) are shown in Fig. 10. By inhibiting mannosidase I in the cis Golgi, it prevents the removal of three mannose residues. Clearly, therefore, it can be argued that the removal of one or more of these sugars is crucial for the addition of PC to ES-62. If this does not take place then PC is not attached. As the processing steps which dMM inhibit occur in the cis Golgi, this indeed confirms that PC is added to the N-glycan, post-ER.


Fig. 10. Inhibition of oligosaccharide processing by dMM and swainsonine. dMM inhibits conversion of Man8GlcNAc2 to Man5GlcNAc2 in the cis Golgi; swainsonine inhibits conversion of Man5Glc3 to Man3GlcNAc3 in the medial Golgi. open circle , mannose; black-square, N-acetylglucosamine.
[View Larger Version of this Image (11K GIF file)]


The failure of dNM to prevent addition of PC to some of the other molecules in the cell extract may suggest that their mode of attachment of PC is not based on use of an N-type glycan. This is consistent with some preliminary data we have obtained that intriguingly suggests that PC may be more frequently attached to nonsecreted molecules of filarial nematodes via O-type glycans. This is currently being explored further. Maizels and colleagues (31) have previously produced some preliminary data consistent with PC being attached to molecules containing O-glycans.

Addition of PC is not prevented by exposure of A. viteae to swainsonine, the inhibitor of mannosidase II in the medial Golgi. This result can be explained by the oligosaccharide processing steps, which swainsonine inhibits, not being required for PC addition to take place. Fig. 10 shows that two mannose residues are removed from the 6-linked branch of the N-glycan by mannosidase II. The fact that blockage of this step has not prevented PC addition might suggest that PC is added to the 3-linked branch of the glycan. Also, based on its resistance to endoglycosidase H (20) and to the finding that N-glycans of swainsonine-treated ES-62 are susceptible (Fig. 9, track a), the substrate oligosaccharide would appear to be subject to processing by mannosidase II. Clearly, if this is the case, PC cannot be bound to the two mannose residues that this enzyme targets.

If the N-glycan to which PC is attached is indeed trimmed by mannosidase II, then it must also be subject to the action of GlcNAc transferase I. This is because addition of GlcNac by this enzyme results in generation of the appropriate substrate for mannosidase II. Whether the addition of the GlcNAc is a prerequisite for PC addition is uncertain. If PC addition is an earlier event, then it would appear that it does not inhibit GlcNAc attachment. Conversely, we have no evidence of further oligosaccharide processing beyond removal of Man4-5 in that we have been unable to biosynthetically label ES-62 with [3H]galactose (result not shown) or find any evidence of complex glycans by lectin binding (20). This raises the question as to whether further processing is blocked by PC addition and leads us to consider whether transfer of GlcNAc, rather than removal of Man6-8, may be the crucial event for PC addition. Certainly our data are consistent with the glycan of ES-62, to which PC is attached initially, resembling the Man5GlcNAc3 structure which results after the action of GlcNac transferase I and then subsequently being converted into Man3GlcNAc3 by the action of mannosidase II (Fig. 10). However, since PC addition has been shown to be independent of the action of mannosidase II, attachment could with equal likelihood occur following removal of Man4-5. Regardless of which (if either) model is correct, the data obtained using dMM and swainsonine, allied to the lack of evidence for formation of complex glycans, strongly support the site of PC addition as being the medial Golgi.

In summary, the data we have obtained provide the first information on the site and mechanism of synthesis of filarial PC-glycans, previously unstudied structures that may play an important role in parasite survival. Furthermore, in addition to being of purely scientific interest, such data in combination with structural analysis could ultimately be of therapeutic value in that it may provide ideas for designing inhibitors of PC attachment for use as drugs. One idea, for example, would be to design a reagent which resembles the glycan substrate for PC addition in order that it may act as a competitive inhibitor. The prevention of PC addition resulting from exposure of worms to reagents such as dNM and dMM confirms that such an approach is a feasible proposition.


FOOTNOTES

*   This investigation was supported by the Onchocerciasis Control Program in West Africa-UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Program for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases Macrofil Chemotherapy Project, the Wellcome Trust, and Tenovus, Scotland. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§   To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 44-41-552-4400; Fax: 44-41-552-6674.
1    The abbreviations used are: PC, phosphorylcholine; dNM, 1-deoxynorijirimycin; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; dMM, 1-deoxymannojirimycin; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

REFERENCES

  1. World Health Organization (1993) in Tropical Disease Research, Progress 1991-92 (Walgate, R., and Simpson, K., eds), pp. 37-46, World Health Organization, Geneva
  2. Harnett, W., and Parkhouse, R. M. E. (1995) in Perspectives in Nematode Physiology and Biochemistry (Sood, M. L., ed), pp. 207-242, M/S Narendra Publication House, New Delhi
  3. Lal, R. B., Kumaraswami, V., Steel, C., and Nutman, T. B. (1990) Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 42, 56-64 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Harnett, W., Worms, M. J., Kapil, A., Grainger, M., and Parkhouse, R. M. E. (1989) Parasitology 99, 229-239 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Harnett, W., and Harnett, M. M. (1993) J. Immunol. 151, 4829-4837 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Forsyth, K. P., Copeman, D. B., and Mitchell, G. F. (1984) Exp. Parasitol. 58, 41-55 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Brundish, D. E., and Baddiley, J. (1968) Biochem. J. 110, 573-582 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Briles, E. B., and Tomasz, A. (1975) J. Bacteriol. 122, 335-337 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Horne, D. S., and Tomasz, A. (1993) J. Bacteriol. 175, 1717-1722 [Abstract]
  10. Bennet, L. G., and Bishop, C. T. (1977) Can. J. Chem. 55, 8-16
  11. Harnett, W., Houston, K. M., Amess, R., and Worms, M. J. (1993) Exp. Parasitol. 77, 498-502 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Unkefer, C. J., and Gander, J. E. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 685-689 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Houston, K. M., and Harnett, W. (1996) J. Parasitol. 82, 320-324 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Pfeffer, P., and Rothman, J. E. (1987) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 56, 829-852 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Carrol, M., and Bird, M. M. (1991) Int. J. Biochem. 23, 1293-1299 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Elbein, A. D. (1987) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 56, 497-534 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Worms, M. J., Terry, R. J., and Terry, A. (1961) J. Parasitol. 47, 963-970
  18. Harnett, W., Patterson, M., Copeman, D. B., and Parkhouse, R. M. E. (1994) Int. J. Parasitol. 24, 543-550 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Leon, M. A., and Young, N. M. (1971) Biochemistry 10, 1424-1429 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Harnett, W., Frame, M. J., Nor, Z. M., MacDonald, M., and Houston, K. M. (1994) Parasite 1, 179-181 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Selkirk, M. E., Gregory, W. F., Yazdanbakhsh, M., Jenkins, R. E., and Maizels, R. M. (1990) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 42, 31-44 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Lodish, H. F., and Kong, N. (1984) J. Cell Biol. 98, 1720-1729 [Abstract]
  23. Shibuya, N., Goldstein, I. J., Van Damme, E. J. M., and Peumans, W. J. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 728-734 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Tarentino, A. L., and Maley, F. (1974) J. Biol. Chem. 249, 811-817 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Selkirk, M. E., Gregory, W. F., Jenkins, R. E., and Maizels, R. M. (1993) Parasitology 107, 449-457 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Palade, G. (1975) Science 189, 347-357 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Lodish, H. F., Kong, N., Snider, M., and Strous, G. J. A. M. (1983) Nature 304, 80-83 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Misumi, Y., Misumi, Y., Miki, K., Takatsuki, A., Tamura, G., and Ikehara, Y. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 11398-11403 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Yewdell, J. W., and Bennink, J. R. (1989) Science 244, 1072-1075 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Fuhrmann, U., Bause, E., Legler, G., and Ploegh, H. (1984) Nature 307, 755-758 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Maizels, R. M., Burke, J., and Denham, D. A. (1987) Parasite Immunol. (Oxf.) 9, 49-66 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.