Insulin and Interleukin-4 Induce Desensitization to the Mitogenic Effects of Insulin-like Growth Factor-I
PIVOTAL ROLE FOR INSULIN RECEPTOR SUBSTRATE-2*

(Received for publication, April 4, 1997, and in revised form, May 15, 1997)

Tufia C. Haddad and Cheryl A. Conover Dagger

From the Endocrine Research Unit, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, 5-164 W. Joseph, Rochester, Minnesota 55905

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Insulin-induced desensitization to insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) stimulated mitogenesis in bovine fibroblasts involves steps distal to IGF-I binding to its tyrosine kinase receptor. When quiescent cultures of bovine fibroblasts were stimulated with 10 nM IGF-I and total cell lysates immunoblotted with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody, we observed a band at ~97 kDa, representing the beta -subunit of the IGF-I receptor, and a predominant tyrosyl-phosphorylated species migrating as a broad band between 170 and 190 kDa. The majority of proteins in this latter band were immunoprecipitated by antibodies against insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-2 and not by antibodies against IRS-1. Pretreatment of bovine fibroblasts with 10 nM insulin for 48 h blocked subsequent IGF-I-stimulated DNA synthesis and the IGF-I-induced increase in tyrosyl-phosphorylated IRS-2. Insulin pretreatment did not alter IRS-1 or IRS-2 expression by these cells, as assessed by metabolic labeling and direct immunoblotting with IRS antibodies. The interleukin-4 (IL-4) cytokine receptor also has IRS-2 as its major substrate for tyrosine phosphorylation. Although 10 nM IL-4 was as effective as 10 nM IGF-I in stimulating IRS-2 phosphorylation, 10 nM IL-4 did not have comparable mitogenic power in these cells. Nonetheless, pretreatment of bovine fibroblasts with IL-4 inhibited IGF-I-stimulated DNA synthesis by 50-60%, concomitant with a decrease in IGF-I-induced IRS-2 phosphorylation. Insulin-induced desensitization could be prevented if a specific inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (LY294002), but not an inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase (PD98059), was present during the preincubation period. LY294002 also prevented the shift in IRS-2 molecular mass in response to prolonged incubation of cells with insulin. These data indicate that, in a nontransformed cell system, IRS-2 plays a key role in cellular desensitization to IGF-I-stimulated mitogenesis most likely through a feedback mechanism in the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway. Furthermore, they suggest that signaling through IRS-2 may provide an important point of integration for hormone, growth factor, and cytokine receptor systems that regulate critical cellular growth responses.


INTRODUCTION

Peptide growth factors bind to specific transmembrane receptors to initiate intracellular events that must be highly coordinated and controlled to elicit appropriate changes in nuclear gene expression and consequent cell replication. This coordination must include important molecular mechanisms that operate to restrain mitogenic signaling as well, since constitutive activation of growth factor pathways would be dysfunctional. Thus, negative feedback mechanisms and internal checks are implicit, if not always explicit, in every important regulatory system involved in cell growth. Furthermore, cross-talk and overlap in receptor intracellular signaling pathways, especially as they apply to heterologous interactions, are a powerful means of processing and coordinating external signals to set cell context and generate an appropriate response to the environment. Little is known about the molecular basis of these interactions, however.

Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I)1 is an essential growth-promoting peptide that shares structural and functional features with insulin (1). We have previously shown that IGF-I is a potent mitogen for normal bovine fibroblasts in culture (2, 3). However, pretreatment with physiologic insulin concentrations rendered these cells refractory to subsequent IGF-I stimulation of DNA synthesis (3). This insulin-induced desensitization to IGF-I is selective (i.e. no loss of responsiveness to serum), is mediated by specific insulin receptors on bovine fibroblast, and involves events proximal to induction of the nuclear proto-oncogene, c-myc,2 and distal to IGF-I receptor binding and activation (3). These data suggested that insulin controlled cell response to IGF-I at an intracellular step along a mitogenic pathway shared by insulin and IGF-I.

The biological effects of insulin and IGF-I are mediated by specific cell surface receptors. These receptors are structurally homologous alpha 2beta 2 heterotetramers belonging to the family of ligand-activated receptor tyrosine kinases (4-7). Extracellular binding of ligand to receptor alpha -subunits induces conformational changes and phosphorylation of receptor beta -subunits on tyrosines leading to autoactivation of the receptor tyrosine kinase toward specific intracellular proteins. The major receptor substrates include IRS (insulin receptor substrate) and Shc (Src-homology 2/alpha -collagen) proteins. In most cell systems studied, IRS-1 (~170 kDa) is the predominant substrate phosphorylated in response to stimulation by insulin or IGF-I (8, 9); and several observations suggest a key role for IRS-1 in control of cell proliferation by insulin and IGF-I (10-13). Phosphorylation of IRS-1 on multiple specific tyrosines has the potential for divergent and amplified signaling. Phosphorylated IRS-1 stimulates engagement and activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase) and its cell growth signaling pathway (14-16). Recent data suggest that feedback from secondary signals may attenuate the initial signaling potential of IRS-1 through activation of protein-tyrosine phosphatases and/or serine/threonine kinases (17, 18). Phosphorylated IRS-1 can also activate the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase/extracellular signal-related kinase pathway (8, 19). Shc phosphorylation is stimulated strongly by mitogens and growth factors, and appears to act primarily through MAP kinase activation (20). Indeed, MAP kinase has been suggested to be a point of integration for multiple intracellular signals transmitted by various mitogens, and to serve as the cytoplasmic connection between plasma membrane and nuclear events (21).

IRS-2 was discovered as an alternative insulin receptor substrate in IRS-1 knock-out mice (22, 23). IRS-2 is slightly larger (~190 kDa) and immunologically distinct from IRS-1, but in most in vitro systems IRS-2 appears to function as does IRS-1, i.e. IRS-2 has the potential to link insulin and IGF-I signaling to both PI 3-kinase and MAP kinase activation (22-25). A physiologic role for IRS-2 has not been documented as yet, although two phosphotyrosine binding elements in IRS-2, which are not found in IRS-1, suggest a distinct functional role in vivo (26). Furthermore, Peraldi et al. (27) recently reported a difference between IRS-1 and IRS-2 in their sensitivity to tumor necrosis factor alpha -induced inhibition in myeloid 32D cells. In addition, IRS-2 was found to be identical to 4PS, the major tyrosine-phosphorylated substrate of the interleukin-4 (IL-4) receptor (23). Unlike the insulin and IGF-I receptors, the IL-4 receptor is not a tyrosine kinase itself, but upon activation it stimulates an associated Janus kinase, which phosphorylates tyrosine residues on the IL-4 receptor (23, 25, 28, 29). 4PS has also been shown to engage and activate PI 3-kinase (23).

The purpose of this study was to define the molecular events underlying insulin-induced desensitization to IGF-I using the nontransformed bovine fibroblast model. Herein we report a novel role for IRS-2, an intracellular signaling molecule shared by IGF-I, insulin, and IL-4 receptors, in regulating the cells' mitogenic response to IGF-I.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

Recombinant human IGF-I and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were purchased from R & D Systems, Inc. (Minneapolis, MN). Crystalline bovine insulin was kindly provided by Lilly (Indianapolis, IN). IL-4, fetal bovine serum and radioimmunoassay grade bovine serum albumin were from Sigma. Tissue culture media and supplements were obtained from Life Technologies, Inc. Antibodies against phosphotyrosine (alpha PY20) were purchased from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY), and antibodies against IRS-1 (alpha IRS-1) and IRS-2 (alpha IRS-2) were from Upstate Biotechnology Inc. (Lake Placid, NY). A monoclonal IGF-I receptor antibody generated against a synthetic peptide corresponding to sequences in the C terminus of the beta -subunit was generously provided by Dr. R. J. Smith (Boston, MA). PD98059 and LY294002 were obtained from New England Biolabs, Inc. (Beverly, MA) and Biomol Research Laboratories, Inc. (Plymouth Meeting, PA), respectively.

Cell Cultures

Bovine dermal fibroblasts (GM06034) were purchased from the Human Genetic Mutant Cell Repository (Camden, NJ). Fibroblasts were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 4 mM glutamine, and containing 10% fetal bovine serum. Cultures were used between passages 7 and 14. For all experiments, confluent cells were washed and incubated for 48 h in serum-free Waymouth's medium:Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium plus 0.1% bovine serum albumin (SFM) with or without the indicated additions (3). After this preincubation period, cells were treated as described for the different methodologies.

DNA Synthesis

Cells were washed three times and the medium changed to SFM with or without peptide stimulus. [3H]Thymidine (0.5 µCi/ml; 1.5 µM) was added at 22 h, and the cells were harvested at 26 h. Details of this method have been reported previously (2, 3). Results are expressed as the percent of total counts in the incubation medium incorporated into acid-precipitable material.

Cell Lysates

Cells were acutely treated with peptide stimulus, washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline containing 2 mM Na3VO4, and then lysed with 20 mM Tris, pH 7.6, containing 137 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 2 mM Na3VO4, 1% Nonidet P-40, 10% glycerol, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 10 mM sodium fluoride, 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, leupeptin (10 µg/ml), and aprotonin (10 µg/ml). Cell lysates were sonicated and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. Protein content of the lysate was determined using a BCA protein assay (Pierce Chemical Co.).

Immunoblot

Equal amounts of lysate protein (~100 µg) were processed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) under reducing conditions (100 mM dithiothreitol) using a 5-15% linear gradient, and then transferred to nitrocellulose. Filters were blocked for 4-6 h, incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibody or nonspecific IgG, washed, and then incubated for 2 h at room temperature with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody. Antigen-antibody reactions were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescent detection system (Amersham Life Sciences).

Immunoprecipitation

Cell lysates were incubated for 4-6 h at 4 °C with 4 µg of primary antibody/mg of total protein. Protein A-agarose beads (Oncogene Science Inc., Uniondale, NY) were added and incubation continued overnight as described previously (30). Immunoprecipitated proteins were washed and analyzed by immunoblot.

Metabolic Labeling

Confluent bovine fibroblasts were incubated in SFM for 24 h with and without additions and then changed to methionine- and cysteine-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 0.1% bovine serum albumin and Tran35S-label (50 µCi/ml, ICN, Costa Mesa, CA) with and without the same additions for 24 h. Cell lysates were precleared with protein A-agarose beads for 2 h at 4 °C, and the supernatants subjected to immunoprecipitation with the appropriate antibodies. Immunoprecipitated proteins were separated by 5-15% SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions. The resultant gel was soaked in Enlightening reagent (NEN Life Sciences Products Inc.) and analyzed by autoradiography.

MAP Kinase Activity

MAP kinase activity was determined using an in-gel renaturation assay modified from Gotoh et al. (31). Cells were treated without and with IGF-I or insulin for 5 and 90 min at 37 °C. Total cell lysates (25 µg of protein) were resolved on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel containing 0.2 mg/ml myelin basic protein. The gel was rinsed four times for 20 min with 20% isopropyl alcohol in 50 mM Tris (pH 8.0), and then denatured by two 30-min washes with 50 mM Tris (pH 8.0) containing 6 M guanidine HCl and 5 mM mercaptoethanol. Renaturation proceeded overnight with four changes of 5 mM mercaptoethanol and 0.04% Tween 40 in 50 mM Tris (pH 8.0) buffer. The following morning the gel was incubated in assay buffer (40 mM HEPES, pH 8.0, containing 0.1 mM EGTA, 5 mM magnesium acetate, and 2 mM dithiothreitol) for 30 min at 30 °C. The in-gel kinase reaction was then initiated with the addition of 20 µM [gamma -32P]ATP (90 µCi), and allowed to proceed for 1 h at room temperature. The reaction was terminated by washing the gel 6 times for 20 min in 5% trichloroacetic acid with 1% sodium pyrophosphate. After these washes the gel was vacuum-dried and subjected to autoradiography.


RESULTS

Tyrosine-phosphorylated IGF-I Receptor Substrates

Bovine fibroblasts possess abundant IGF-I receptors and respond to exogenous IGF-I with marked increases in nuclear proto-oncogene expression,2 DNA synthesis, and cell replication (2, 3). To investigate the initial signaling events in IGF receptor activation, quiescent cultures of bovine fibroblasts were stimulated with 10 nM IGF-I for 10 min and total cell lysates were prepared. Lysate proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose filters, and immunoblotted with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (alpha PY20). With IGF-I treatment, we observed a band at ~97 kDa, and a predominant tyrosyl-phosphorylated species migrating as a broad band between 170 and 190 kDa (Fig. 1). Using a specific IGF-I receptor antibody with broad species recognition, the 97-kDa protein was documented to represent the beta -subunit of the IGF-I receptor (data not shown). The 170-190-kDa band approximated the size of IRS protein, and we initially presumed it represented IRS-1, the major insulin and IGF-I receptor substrate. However, the majority of tyrosyl-phosphorylated protein in this 170-190-kDa band was immunoprecipitated by antibodies against IRS-2 and not by antibodies against IRS-1 (Fig. 2). The protein immunoprecipitated by alpha IRS-2 appeared to represent the higher molecular weight component of the 170-190-kDa band. Nonspecific IgG did not precipitate any alpha PY20 reactivity.


Fig. 1. Tyrosine phosphorylation in response to IGF-I. Serum-deprived bovine fibroblasts were treated without (-) and with (+) 10 nM IGF-I for 10 min. Total cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with alpha PY20. Migration positions of molecular size markers (in kDa) are indicated on the left.
[View Larger Version of this Image (39K GIF file)]


Fig. 2. IGF-I induces tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-2. Bovine fibroblasts were treated as in Fig. 1 without (-) and with (+) IGF-I. Total cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with alpha IRS-1, alpha IRS-2, or nonspecific IgG followed by immunoblotting with alpha PY20.
[View Larger Version of this Image (46K GIF file)]

Both IRS-1 and IRS-2 proteins could be identified by metabolic labeling of cultured bovine fibroblasts with Tran35S-label, followed by immunoprecipitation (Fig. 3). The antibodies used to identify IRS-1 and IRS-2 were specific for each of the molecules, since the two proteins could be distinguished by migration on SDS-PAGE. The labeled protein species immunoprecipitated with alpha IRS-1 migrated at ~170 kDa; the species immunoprecipitated with alpha IRS-2 migrated at ~190 kDa. No cross-reactivity of antibodies and antigens was evident.


Fig. 3. Metabolic labeling. Bovine fibroblasts without (lanes a, c, and e) and with (lanes b, d, and f) 10 nM insulin pretreatment were labeled with Trans35S-label overnight. Cell extracts were immunoprecipitated with alpha IRS-1 (lanes c and d), alpha IRS-2 (lanes e and f), or nonspecific IgG (lanes a and b). The immunoprecipitated proteins were separated by 5-15% SDS-PAGE and detected by autoradiography as described under "Experimental Procedures."
[View Larger Version of this Image (23K GIF file)]

Insulin-induced Desensitization

As shown in Fig. 4, preincubation but not co-incubation with low concentrations of insulin desensitized bovine fibroblasts to the mitogenic effects of IGF-I. Bovine fibroblasts were washed and changed to serum-free medium for 48 h without or with 10 nM insulin. Cells were washed extensively and then 10 nM IGF-I, 10 nM insulin, or 10 nM IGF-I plus 10 nM insulin added, and [3H]thymidine incorporation determined. IGF-I stimulated [3H]thymidine incorporation 45-fold. Insulin alone produced a much smaller but significant increase in [3H]thymidine incorporation. The co-addition of insulin had no significant effect on IGF-I-stimulated DNA synthesis. However, pretreatment with the same amount of insulin inhibited IGF-I-stimulated [3H]thymidine incorporation by 85%. This insulin-induced cellular desensitization has been characterized previously and cannot be accounted for by changes in IGF-I receptor binding (3).


Fig. 4. IGF-I stimulation of [3H]thymidine incorporation: effect of insulin preincubation and coincubation. Bovine fibroblasts were serum-starved for 48 h without (C) and with 10 nM insulin (ins). Cells were washed and medium changed to SFM containing 10 nM IGF-I, 10 nM insulin, or the combination. [3H]Thymidine incorporation was measured at 22-26 h as described under "Experimental Procedures." Results are presented as mean ± S.E. of three determinations. *, significant effect of preincubation on IGF-I stimulation, p < 0.05.
[View Larger Version of this Image (27K GIF file)]

Investigating where the insulin-induced desensitization occurs along the IGF-I receptor signaling pathway, bovine fibroblasts were treated as in Fig. 4 and total cell lysates immunoblotted for tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins (Fig. 5). IGF-I stimulation was associated with the appearance of bands on alpha PY20 immunoblots at 97 and 170-190 kDa, as in Fig. 1. Pretreatment with 10 nM insulin for 48 h alone had no visible effect on tyrosine phosphorylation of proteins at 170-190 kDa, but completely prevented the ability of IGF-I to induce phosphorylation of the higher molecular weight bands associated with IRS-2. The lower molecular weight bands in this complex, presumably including IRS-1, did not appear to be affected by insulin pretreatment. A specific decrease in tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-2 was verified by immunoprecipitation (data not shown). Prolonged insulin treatment also diminished IGF-I-stimulated phosphorylation of the 97-kDa band associated with IGF-I receptor beta -subunit, even though some IGF-I receptor-mediated responses are not impaired under these conditions (Ref. 3, and see Fig. 8).


Fig. 5. Tyrosine phosphorylation in response to IGF-I: effect of insulin preincubation. Bovine fibroblasts were preincubated without (C) and with 10 nM insulin (ins), washed, and stimulated without or with 10 nM IGF-I (IGF) for 10 min. Total cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with alpha PY20. Migration positions of molecular size markers (in kDa) are indicated on the left.
[View Larger Version of this Image (40K GIF file)]


Fig. 8. MAP kinase activity. Bovine fibroblasts were preincubated without (C) and with 10 nM insulin (ins), washed, and stimulated without and with 10 nM IGF-I for 5 or 90 min. MAP kinase activity in total cell lysates was determined with an in-gel renaturation assay using myelin basic protein as substrate (see "Experimental Procedures."). Arrows indicate p42/p44 MAP kinase.
[View Larger Version of this Image (19K GIF file)]

Treatment with 10 nM insulin for 48 h had little or no effect on IRS-1 or IRS-2 protein content as assessed by direct immunoblotting with IRS antibodies (not shown) or by metabolic labeling (Fig. 3). The level of IRS-1 and IRS-2 protein present with and without insulin treatment was nearly equal, as determined by measuring the radioactivity in each band by scintillation counting (Table I). However, following insulin treatment, IRS-2 migrated slower and as a broader band on SDS-PAGE. This decrease in mobility, despite the decrease in tyrosine phosphorylation, is often associated with increased serine/threonine protein phosphorylation (10).

Table I. Metabolic labeling of IRS-1 and IRS-2 with Tran35S in bovine fibroblasts

Table shows effect of insulin preincubation. IRS-1 and IRS-2 bands identified in Fig. 3 were cut out and analyzed by scintillation counting. Background radioactivity (i.e. gel bands in the same positions for IRS-1 and -2 on IgG lanes) has been subtracted.

Preincubation Incorporated radioactivity (cpm)
IRS-1 IRS-2

Control 554 857
Insulin 808 881

Interleukin-4 and IGF-I Receptor Signaling

Since the IL-4 cytokine receptor also has IRS-2 as its major substrate for tyrosine phosphorylation, we assessed the influence of IL-4 in our cell system. As shown in Fig. 6, 10 nM IGF-I stimulated [3H]thymidine incorporation 30-fold, whereas IL-4 showed no significant dose-dependent stimulation. However, pretreatment of bovine fibroblasts with 10 nM IL-4 inhibited IGF-I-stimulated DNA synthesis by 50-60% (p < 0.05) in four separate experiments. Pretreatment with two other cytokines, IL-1beta and IL-6, had no effect on IGF-I action in these experiments. In parallel experiments, 10 nM IL-4 was as effective as 10 nM IGF-I in stimulating IRS-2 tyrosyl phosphorylation (Fig. 7A), even though, as noted in Fig. 6, this did not translate into a comparable mitogenic effect. Nonetheless, pretreatment with 10 nM IL-4 inhibited IGF-I-induced IRS-2 phosphorylation. This was not due to down-regulation of IRS-2 since IL-4 had no effect on IRS-2 protein content (Fig. 7B). Pretreatment with IL-1beta or IL-6 had no effect on IRS-2 phosphorylation or expression in these cells (data not shown).


Fig. 6. IGF-I stimulation of [3H]thymidine incorporation: effect of preincubation with IL-1beta , IL-4, and IL-6. Bovine fibroblasts were preincubated for 48 h without (C) and with 10 nM IL-1beta (IL1), IL-4, or IL-6, washed, and then stimulated without or with 10 nM IGF-I, IL-1beta , IL-4, or IL-6. [3H]Thymidine incorporation was measured at 22-26 h as described under "Experimental Procedures." Results are presented as mean ± S.E. of three determinations. *, significant effect of preincubation, p < 0.05.
[View Larger Version of this Image (29K GIF file)]


Fig. 7. IRS-2 expression and tyrosine phosphorylation in response to IGF-I: effect of IL-4 preincubation. Bovine fibroblasts were preincubated without (C) and with 10 nM IL-4, washed, and stimulated without and with 10 nM IGF-I or 10 nM IL-4 for 10 min. Total cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with alpha PY20 (A). Filters were stripped with 60 mM Tris, pH 6.8, 100 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 2% SDS and immunoblotted with alpha IRS-2 (B).
[View Larger Version of this Image (28K GIF file)]

Desensitization in the Receptor Signaling Network

IRS-2 has the potential to link IGF-I signaling to both MAP kinase and PI 3-kinase activation. MAP kinase is thought to be the more important pathway for directing IGF-I receptor signaling toward mitogenesis (20); therefore, MAP kinase activity in bovine fibroblasts was measured using a functional in-gel assay. In preliminary time course experiments (not shown), we found that 10 nM insulin and 10 nM IGF-I were equivalent in increasing by 3-5-fold the activity of the p42 and p44 isoforms of MAP kinase. Activation was transient with peak activity occurring within 5 min and returning to near baseline by 90 min. No MAP kinase activity was detectable 24 h after stimulation. This pattern of acute MAP kinase activation is characteristic, and differences in duration of response may influence cell signaling decisions (32, 33). As shown in Fig. 8, IGF-I increased p42/p44 MAP kinase activity 5-fold, and neither the magnitude nor the duration of this stimulation was affected by pretreatment with insulin for 48 h. Similarly, we saw no effect of IL-4 pretreatment on the ability of IGF-I to activate the MAP kinase pathway (data not shown). Therefore, despite activation of the MAP kinase signaling pathway, IGF-I-stimulated mitogenesis did not occur if preceded by insulin or IL-4 receptor activation. That insulin-induced cellular desensitization does not involve the MAP kinase signaling pathway was supported by experiments using PD98059, a specific inhibitor of MAP kinase activation by upstream MAP kinase kinase (34). Although we could show that PD98059 was an effective inhibitor of insulin-stimulated MAP kinase activity in our system, the presence of PD98059 during insulin pretreatment did not prevent cellular desensitization to subsequent IGF-I stimulation (Table II). PD98059 did not have an independent inhibitory effect since pretreatment for 48 h with PD98059 alone did not interfere with IGF-I stimulation.

Table II. Effect of PD98059 on insulin-induced desensitization to IGF-I

Bovine fibroblasts were preincubated for 48 h without (control) or with 10 nM insulin, 20 µM PD98059, or the combination. Cultures were washed and IGF-I-stimulated [3H]thymidine incorporation measured as described in the legend to Fig. 4. Results are mean ± S.E. of three determinations.

Preincubation % [3H]thymidine incorporation
Control IGF-I

Control 0.19  ± 0.017 7.92  ± 0.244
Insulin 0.20  ± 0.011 1.34  ± 0.092a
PD98059 0.12  ± 0.012 7.32  ± 0.459
Insulin + PD98059 0.09  ± 0.004 1.32  ± 0.108a

a Significant effect of preincubation on IGF-I stimulation, p < 0.05.

On the other hand, insulin-induced desensitization to IGF-I could be prevented if LY294002, a specific inhibitor of PI 3-kinase activation (35), was present during the preincubation period (Fig. 9). In three separate experiments, IGF-I stimulation following preincubation with insulin and LY294002 was 94-106% of maximum versus 21-25% of maximum following preincubation with insulin alone. LY294002 pretreatment in the absence of insulin produced a decrease in IGF-I-stimulated [3H]thymidine incorporation, which appeared to reflect a residual effect of the inhibitor on IGF-I receptor signaling (data not shown). Retention of IRS-2 tyrosine phosphorylation was concomitant with the IGF-I-stimulated DNA synthesis following preincubation with insulin and LY294002 (data not shown). Interestingly, LY294002 also prevented the decrease in mobility and broadening of the IRS-2 band on SDS gels in response to prolonged insulin treatment (Fig. 10).


Fig. 9. Effect of LY294002 on insulin-induced desensitization to IGF-I. Bovine fibroblasts were preincubated for 48 h without (C) or with 10 nM insulin (ins), 50 µM LY294002 (LY), or the combination. Cultures were washed and IGF-I-stimulated [3H]thymidine incorporation measured. Results are mean ± S.E. of three determinations. *, significant effect of preincubation on IGF-I stimulation.
[View Larger Version of this Image (21K GIF file)]


Fig. 10. Metabolic labeling: effect of LY294002. Cells were pretreated with 10 nM insulin (lanes a-d) as in Fig. 3, except that LY294002 (50 µM) was included in the insulin preincubation period (lanes b and d). Total cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with alpha IRS-2 or nonspecific IgG, and run on a 5-15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. 35S-Labeled proteins were detected by autoradiography.
[View Larger Version of this Image (43K GIF file)]


DISCUSSION

The control of cell growth is complex, involving coordinated integration of signals arising from a variety of activated receptors. The vast majority of studies use transfected or immortalized cells overexpressing a particular receptor to delineate its signal transduction pathway for mitogenesis. This approach has been crucial to our present understanding of cell growth. Nevertheless, there is a growing appreciation that feedback loops and intracellular cross-talk between signaling pathways may underlie natural mechanisms of receptor activity regulation, and that "normal" cell models may be more relevant to these types of investigations. Cultured bovine fibroblasts, naturally expressing a high number of IGF-I receptors, have been a useful cell model for studying various aspects of IGF physiology (2, 3, 36, 37). In the present study we identified signaling cascades involved in IGF-I-induced mitogenesis in these cells, characterized the interplay among IGF-I, insulin, and cytokine receptor signaling, and produced evidence of a distinct role for IRS-2 in cell growth regulation.

IGF-I, Insulin, and Cytokine Receptor Signaling in Normal Bovine Fibroblasts

Cultured bovine fibroblasts possess classic IGF-I tyrosine kinase receptors with mitogenic end points similar to those reported for insulin tyrosine kinase receptors, proto-oncogene expression, DNA synthesis, and cell replication (2, 3). We found the initial signaling events to be similar as well, i.e. autophosphorylation of the receptor beta -subunit on tyrosines and subsequent tyrosine phosphorylation of specific intracellular substrates, primarily IRS. Interestingly, the major IRS protein tyrosine-phosphorylated in response to IGF-I in bovine fibroblasts was IRS-2, rather than IRS-1. IRS-1 is expressed by these cells, however, as determined by metabolic labeling. No other IGF-responsive tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins were evident under our conditions. Phosphorylation of Shc protein represents an IGF-I-stimulated signaling event alternative to IRS (8, 9, 20). However, there was no specific increase in tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins of 46, 52, and 66 kDa that could represent Shc proteins and no specific protein immunoprecipitated with alpha Shc antibodies (data not shown), suggesting low abundance of Shc in these cells.

Insulin receptors also mediate proto-oncogene expression and DNA synthesis in bovine fibroblasts. However, pre-exposure to low concentrations of insulin that do not interfere with IGF-I receptor binding renders the cells refractory to subsequent IGF-I-stimulated DNA synthesis (3). Under these conditions, preincubation with insulin completely blocked the IGF-I-induced increase in tyrosine-phosphorylated 190-kDa IRS-2. The tyrosyl-phosphorylated band at 170 kDa, presumably IRS-1, was relatively unaffected by insulin. These data implicate IRS-2 in insulin/IGF-I post-receptor interplay, and suggest that IRS-2, and not IRS-1, is involved in insulin-induced desensitization to IGF-I in this model. Giorgino and Smith (38) similarly concluded that IRS-1 is not involved in dexamethasone-induced potentiation of IGF-I receptor signaling in muscle cells.

IL-4, a pluripotent cytokine, was equivalent to IGF-I in rapid tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-2 in bovine fibroblasts. This effect was not seen with the other interleukins tested (IL-1beta and IL-6). Unlike IGF-I and insulin receptors, the IL-4 receptor does not possess intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity and presumably gains this function through association with Janus kinases (23, 25, 28, 29). IL-4-induced IRS-2 phosphorylation was not associated with a mitogenic response in these cells. Nonetheless, IL-4 pretreatment inhibited both IGF-I-stimulated DNA synthesis and IGF-I-induced IRS-2 tyrosine phosphorylation, suggesting that IRS-2 is not sufficient for mitogenic signaling in this system but that it may be necessary for mitogenic signaling by other growth factors. Alternatively, IGF-I and IL-4 tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-2 may be qualitatively different (39). Furthermore, these data indicate that preactivation of a mitogenic signaling pathway is not essential for desensitization, since IL-4 was able to induce cellular resistance without affecting DNA synthesis. Although the IL-4 receptor is structurally and functionally distinct from the insulin and IGF-I receptors, all three share a common motif in their juxtamembrane region that may directly or indirectly interact with IRS protein (40). It will be important to determine whether this domain is essential for heterologous receptor desensitization. There are other recent examples where cytokines have been shown to influence cell growth response in vivo and in vitro. Leptin, an adipocyte-derived cytokine, attenuated insulin-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 and stimulation of gluconeogenesis in HepG2 cells (41). Tumor necrosis factor alpha  is an important mediator of insulin resistance in muscle and fat tissue (42). Collectively, these data indicate significant interplay among IGF-I, insulin, and cytokine receptor signaling, which may represent part of normal physiologic cell growth regulation.

IRS-2 as a Functional Locus for Cellular Desensitization

Our data suggest that IGF-I, insulin, and IL-4 receptor signaling pathways converge at a step where regulation of IRS-2 activity takes place, and that the phosphorylation status of IRS-2 determines cellular sensitivity. Our findings of unaltered IGF-I-stimulated amino acid transport and glucose uptake (3) and of IGF-I-stimulated MAP kinase activation following prolonged pre-exposure to low concentrations of insulin or IL-4, suggest a functional IGF-I receptor and primary check point beyond receptor autophosphorylation. However, decreased tyrosine phosphorylation of the 97-kDa beta -subunit of the IGF-I receptor may indicate possible upstream effects of receptor autophosphorylation that will need to be addressed. Furthermore, unlike models of chronic stimulation with 10-100-fold higher concentrations of insulin (19, 42-44), down-regulation of IRS-2 (or IRS-1) expression did not occur. In our system, desensitization is also unlikely to be the result of simple competition for a limiting substrate because co-treatment as opposed to pretreatment with insulin or IL-4 had no effect on IGF-I stimulation of DNA synthesis or IRS-2 phosphorylation on tyrosines, although both insulin and IL-4 alone stimulate IRS-2 tyrosine phosphorylation. Thus, time appears to be an important dimension of signal transduction by virtue of its impact on intracellular response patterns which may permit the defined order of the cell cycle to proceed.

The decrease in tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-2 appears to be central to cellular desensitization to IGF-I. This could be accomplished by dephosphorylation of phosphotyrosines on IRS-2 or, alternatively, by phosphorylation on serine/threonines. Phosphorylation of signal elements by activated downstream serine/threonine kinases has been shown to inhibit subsequent tyrosine phosphorylation of the substrate (18, 45). What was striking in our metabolic labeling studies was that insulin-induced cellular desensitization was invariably accompanied by an increase in IRS-2 apparent molecular mass on SDS gels. Sun et al. (10) demonstrated that a similar molecular mass shift in IRS-1 after prolonged insulin treatment of Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with human IRS-1 reflected an increase in degree of serine phosphorylation of the protein. Phosphorylation of IRS-1 on serine and threonine residues interfered with the subsequent tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 by insulin receptors in this system. Our model may be analogous in that activation of insulin receptor or IL-4 receptor signaling may cause increased expression or activation of a downstream serine kinase which phosphorylates IRS-2, thereby preventing subsequent tyrosine phosphorylation by IGF-I receptors. LY294002, an inhibitor of dual specificity PI 3-kinase that possesses both lipid and serine kinase activities (46), was able to prevent this IRS-2 mobility shift and the insulin-induced desensitization to IGF-I, consistent with a role for serine phosphorylation of IRS-2 in cellular desensitization. Interestingly, tumor necrosis factor alpha  has been shown to induce serine phosphorylation of IRS-1 and thereby convert IRS-1 into an inhibitor of insulin receptor tyrosine kinase activity (18). Studies are in progress to determine whether IRS-2 can directly inhibit IGF-I receptor kinase activity in our system. A role for insulin and/or IL-4-induced protein-tyrosine phosphatase activity has not been ruled out, however. It was of particular interest to us that protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B was shown to be increased during prolonged treatment of rat L6 muscle cells with low dose insulin, and that protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B acted as a negative regulator of insulin and IGF-I signaling (17). However, our preliminary experiments (not shown) failed to reveal any change in protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B with insulin treatment of bovine fibroblasts as assessed by immunoblot.

As noted above, inhibition of PI 3-kinase activation by LY294002 blocked the ability of insulin to induce desensitization to IGF-I, implicating the PI 3-kinase signal pathway in cellular desensitization to IGF-I-stimulated mitogenesis. Although MAP kinase is considered a key mitogenic signaling pathway (9, 20, 21), MAP kinase activation was not sufficient to propagate IGF-I-stimulated mitosis in bovine fibroblasts. Furthermore, given the lack of effect of insulin pretreatment on IGF-I-stimulated MAP kinase activity, it seems unlikely that desensitization occurs within the cascade leading to activation of MAP kinase. The latter was supported by the finding that a potent inhibitor of MAP kinase activation, PD98059, did not prevent desensitization during pretreatment with insulin.

Conclusions

The impaired response of bovine fibroblasts to IGF-I as a consequence of pretreatment of cells with insulin or IL-4 is associated with post-receptor signaling alterations at the level of IRS-2. The molecular mechanism for the decrease in IRS-2 tyrosine phosphorylation in response to IGF-I under these conditions is not clear, but the data suggest a feedback mechanism mediated by a preactivated receptor tyrosine kinase pathway (i.e. by insulin or IL-4) that induces serine phosphorylation of IRS-2 which, in turn, interferes with IGF-I receptor-stimulated signal transduction through IRS-2 in these cells. IRS-2 is expressed in many cell types, and is not peculiar to bovine fibroblasts, suggesting a role in normal insulin, IGF-I, and IL-4 signaling (39, 47). Bovine fibroblasts appear to be a particularly useful model for further studies in this regard. Better understanding IRS-2 will be of critical importance to our understanding of integrated cell signaling and post-receptor desensitization, and perhaps be of relevance to growth-resistant states produced by insulin and cytokine receptor activation.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant DK-43258 (to C. A. C.) and the Mayo Foundation.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    To whom reprint requests and all correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 507-255-6415; Fax: 507-255-4828; E-mail: conover.cheryl{at}mayo.edu.
1   The abbreviations used are: IGF-I, insulin-like growth factor I; IRS, insulin receptor substrate; IL-4, interleukin-4; PI 3-kinase, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; MAP kinase, mitogen-activated protein kinase; JAK, Janus kinase; alpha PY20, anti-phosphotyrosine antibody; SFM, serum-free medium; Shc, Src-homology 2/alpha -collagen; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
2   C. A. Conover and L. K. Bale, submitted for publication.

REFERENCES

  1. Daughaday, W. H., and Rotwein, P. (1989) Endocr. Rev. 10, 68-90 [Abstract]
  2. Conover, C. A., Ronk, M., Lombana, F., and Powell, D. R. (1990) Endocrinology 127, 2795-2803 [Abstract]
  3. Conover, C. A., Clarkson, J. T., and Bale, L. K. (1994) Diabetes 43, 1130-1137 [Abstract]
  4. Nissley, P., and Lopaczynski, W. (1991) Growth Factors 5, 29-43 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Tavaré, J. M., and Siddle, K. (1993) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1178, 21-39 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. LeRoith, D., Werner, H., Beitner-Johnson, D., and Roberts, C. T., Jr. (1995) Endocr. Rev. 16, 143-163 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Yarden, Y., and Ullrich, A. (1988) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 57, 443-478 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. White, M. F. (1994) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 4, 47-54 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Seedorf, K. (1995) Metab. Clin. Exp. 44, 24-32
  10. Sun, X. J., Miralpeix, M., Myers, M. G., Jr., Glasheen, E. M., Backer, J. M., Kahn, C. R., and White, M. F. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 22662-22672 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Wang, L. M., Myers, M. G., Jr., Sun, X.-J., Aaronson, S. A., White, M. F., and Pierce, J. H. (1993) Science 261, 1591-1594 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Waters, S. B., Yamaguchi, K., and Pessin, J. E. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 22231-22234 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Rose, D. W., Saltiel, A. R., Majumdar, M., Decker, S. J., and Olefsky, J. M. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 797-801 [Abstract]
  14. Myers, M. G., Jr., Sun, X. J., Cheatham, B., Jachna, B. R., Glasheen, E. M., Backer, J. M., and White, M. F. (1993) Endocrinology 132, 1421-1430 [Abstract]
  15. Myers, M. G., Jr., Grammer, T. C., Wang, L.-M., Sun, X. J., Pierce, J. H., Blenis, J., and White, M. F. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 28783-28789 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Takahashi, Y., Tobe, K., Kadowaki, H., Katsumata, D., Fukushima, Y., Yazaki, Y., Akanuma, Y., and Kadowaki, T. (1997) Endocrinology 138, 741-750 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Kenner, K. A., Anyanwu, E., Olefsky, J. M., and Kusari, J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 19810-19816 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Hotamisligil, G. S., Peraldi, P., Budavari, A., Ellis, R., White, M. F., and Spiegelman, B. M. (1996) Science 271, 665-668 [Abstract]
  19. Inoue, G., Cheatham, B., and Kahn, C. R. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 28206-28211 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Sasaoka, T., Rose, D. W., Jhun, B. H., Saltiel, A. R., Draznin, B., and Olefsky, J. M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 13689-13694 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Ruderman, J. V. (1993) Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 5, 207-213 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Tobe, K., Tamemoto, H., Yamauchi, T., Aizawa, S., Yazaki, Y., and Kadowaki, T. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 5698-5701 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Patti, M.-E., Sun, X.-J., Bruening, J. C., Araki, E., Lipes, M. A., White, M. F., and Kahn, C. R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 24670-24673 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Wang, L.-M., Keegan, A. D., Li, W., Lienhard, G. E., Pacini, S., Gutkind, J. S., Myers, M. G., Jr., Sun, X.-J., White, M. F., Aaronson, S. A., Paul, W. E., and Pierce, J. H. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 4032-4036 [Abstract]
  25. White, M. F. (1996) Phil. Trans. R. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 351, 181-189
  26. He, W., Craparo, A., Zhu, Y., O'Neill, T. J., Wang, L.-M., Pierce, J. H., and Gustafson, T. A. (1966) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 11641-11645 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Peraldi, P., Hotamisligil, G. S., Buurman, W. A., White, M. F., and Spiegelman, B. M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 13018-13022 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Kishimoto, T., Taga, T., and Akira, S. (1994) Cell 76, 253-262 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Schindler, C., and Darnell, J. E., Jr. (1995) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 64, 621-651 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Conover, C. A., Perry, J. E., and Tindall, D. J. (1995) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 80, 987-993 [Abstract]
  31. Gotoh, Y., Nishida, E., Yamishata, T., Hoshi, M., Kawkami, M., and Sakai, H. (1990) Eur. J. Biochem. 193, 661-669 [Abstract]
  32. Marshall, C. J. (1995) Cell 80, 179-185 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Webster, J., Prager, D., and Melmed, S. (1994) Mol. Endocrinol. 8, 539-544 [Abstract]
  34. Dudley, D. T., Pang, L., Decker, S. J., Bridges, A. J., and Saltiel, A. R. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 7686-7689 [Abstract]
  35. Vlahos, C. J., Matter, W. F., Hui, K. Y., and Brown, R. F. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 5241-4248 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Bale, L. K., and Conover, C. A. (1992) Endocrinology 131, 608-614 [Abstract]
  37. Conover, C. A. (1992) Endocrinology 130, 3191-3199 [Abstract]
  38. Giorgino, F., and Smith, R. J. (1995) J. Clin. Invest. 96, 1473-1483 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Sun, X. J., Pons, S., Wang, L.-M., Zhang, Y., Yenush, L., Burks, D., Myers, M. G., Jr., Glasheen, E., Copeland, N. G., Jenkins, N. A., Pierce, J. H., and White, M. F. (1997) Mol. Endocrinol. 11, 251-262 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Keegan, A. D., Nelms, K., White, M., Wang, L.-M., Pierce, J. H., and Paul, W. E. (1994) Cell 76, 811-820 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Cohen, B., Novic, D., and Rubinstein, M. (1996) Science 274, 1185-1188 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Hotamisligil, G. S., Murray, D. L., Choy, L. N., and Spiegelman, B. M. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 4854-4858 [Abstract]
  43. Saad, M. J. A., Folli, F., and Kahn, C. R. (1995) Endocrinology 136, 1579-1588 [Abstract]
  44. Rice, K. M., Turnbow, M. A., and Garner, C. W. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 190, 961-967 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Li, P.-M., and Goldstein, B. J. (1996) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 223, 80-84 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Lam, K., Carpenter, C. L., Ruderman, N. B., Friel, J. C., and Kelly, K. L. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 20648-20652 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Argetsinger, L. S., Norstedt, G., Billestrup, N., White, M. F., and Carter-Su, C. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 29415-29421 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.