Phospholipid Transfer Protein Mediates Transfer of not Only Phosphatidylcholine but Also Cholesterol from Phosphatidylcholine-Cholesterol Vesicles to High Density Lipoproteins*

(Received for publication, October 18, 1996, and in revised form, December 17, 1996)

Hiro I. Nishida and Toshiro Nishida Dagger

From the Burnsides Research Laboratory, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP) purified from human plasma was found to enhance the transfer of cholesterol from single bilayer vesicles containing phosphatidylcholine and cholesterol to high density lipoprotein-3. The rate of cholesterol transfer was greatly influenced by the cholesterol content of the donor vesicles. The maximal rate was observed with the vesicles containing 20-25 mol % cholesterol. This was in contrast to a progressive decline in the rate of phosphatidylcholine transfer with an increase in the cholesterol content. To determine the binding of cholesterol and phosphatidylcholine to PLTP, the mixtures of PLTP and the vesicles containing 3H-labeled phosphatidylcholine and 14C-labeled cholesterol were incubated and subjected to sucrose density gradient centrifugation. Determination of the label profiles showed that cholesterol as well as phosphatidylcholine were transferred from the vesicles to PLTP. The reversible nature of the binding was shown by the transfer of labeled cholesterol and phosphatidylcholine bound to PLTP to the acceptor vesicles or low density lipoprotein. Isothermal equilibrium binding of PLTP for cholesterol and phosphatidylcholine showed that PLTP possessed a considerably higher affinity and binding capacity for phosphatidylcholine than for cholesterol. The phosphatidylcholine binding affinity and capacity were greater when PLTP was incubated with phosphatidylcholine vesicles without cholesterol. A possible importance of PLTP-mediated cholesterol transfer in the circulation was described.


INTRODUCTION

In human plasma, lipids can be exchanged and transferred between different lipoprotein classes by spontaneous, temperature-dependent transfer or by protein-mediated transfer (1). Unesterified cholesterol transfer and exchange occur by a spontaneous process through collision and aqueous diffusion (2, 3). In the cell, possible mechanisms of cholesterol movement also include aqueous diffusion, vesicle-mediated transport, and soluble carrier-mediated transport (4). Protein-mediated exchange and transfer of free cholesterol in the plasma have not been fully investigated. There are two types of lipid transfer proteins in plasma (1). Cholesteryl ester transfer protein promotes the transfer of neutral lipids such as cholesteryl esters and triglycerides, as well as phospholipids (PLs),1 among plasma lipoproteins (5-8). Phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP) facilitates the transfer and exchange of PL but not neutral lipids (9-12). PLTP was also shown to be responsible for the conversion of HDL3 to HDL2 size particles (12, 13).

Lipolysis of triglyceride-rich particles such as chylomicrons and very low density lipoproteins is known to deplete the triglyceride in the lipid core and to produce an excess surface coat of PL, free cholesterol, and apolipoproteins (14-16). Tall et al. (17) showed that PLTP enhanced the transfer and exchange of PL between very low density lipoproteins and HDL during lipolysis. They also showed that phosphatidylcholine (PC) vesicles may serve as a model of the redundant surface coat of lipolyzed particles to study the PL transfer to HDL (18). In this communication, we show that PLTP promoted cholesterol transfer in addition to PL transfer. The magnitude of cholesterol transfer from PC-cholesterol vesicles to HDL3 by PLTP was much greater than that from LDL to HDL3. PLTP was shown to possess the binding sites that can accommodate large numbers of both PC and cholesterol.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

Human plasma samples were obtained from the Champaign County Blood Bank. LDL (d 1.019-1.045 g/ml) and HDL3 (d 1.125-1.21 g/ml) were isolated from fresh, nonturbid plasma by the sequential ultracentrifugation method as described previously (19, 20). Cholesterol (>= 99%) and crystallized lyophilized bovine serum albumin were obtained from Sigma. 1-Palmitoyl-2-oleoylphosphatidylcholine was obtained from Avanti Polar Lipids Inc. [9,10-3H(N)]Dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine (DPPC) (specific activity, 37.5 Ci/mmol), [7-3H(N)]cholesterol (specific activity, 22.0 Ci/mmol), and [4-14C]cholesterol (specific activity, 54.0 mCi/mmol) were obtained from DuPont NEN. [3H]Acetic anhydride (specific activity, 500 mCi/mmol) was purchased from Amersham Corp. All other chemicals were of reagent grade quality and used without further purification. Glass-distilled water was used to prepare all aqueous solutions.

Buffer

Experiments were performed primarily in 39 mM phosphate buffer containing 60 mM NaCl and 0.025% EDTA, ionic strength 0.16, pH 7.4, unless otherwise specified.

Purification of PLTP

PLTP was purified from human plasma according to the method described previously (12). The final purification of the transfer protein was 38,000-fold over the starting plasma. The purified PLTP was stored at 4 °C in 0.4 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 2 mM NaN3 and 0.025% EDTA.

Determination of PLTP-mediated Cholesterol and PC Transfer

Single bilayer vesicles containing PC and varying amounts of cholesterol were prepared essentially according to the method of Batzri and Korn (21) as described previously (12, 20). PC and cholesterol transfer assays were carried out using labeled donor vesicles containing 90 nmol of egg PC and varying amounts (0-37 nmol) of cholesterol/100 µl and HDL3 (180 µg as protein) as the acceptor in phosphate buffer containing 60 mM NaCl with a final volume of 280 µl. The assay incubations were carried out in a similar manner as described previously (12). For the PC transfer assay, 6.2 pmol of [3H]DPPC was added to the egg PC (specific activity, 0.259 µCi/µmol) to prepare the vesicles. For the cholesterol transfer assay, the vesicles contained [3H]cholesterol with a specific activity of 0.43 µCi/µmol. For the transfer assay of both PC and cholesterol, doubly labeled vesicles containing [3H]PC (specific activity, 0.259 µCi/µmol) and [14C]cholesterol (specific activity, 0.44 µCi/µmol) were used. To calculate the amounts of cholesterol transferred, first order kinetics was applied using the equation Xt = X0e-kt, where X0 and Xt are the fractions of labeled cholesterol in the PC-cholesterol vesicles at time 0 and t, respectively, and k is the rate constant (22). The amount of cholesterol transferred to donor particles equals ktX0, where X0 is the initial mass of cholesterol in the donor vesicles. For the LDL/HDL3 assay system, labeled LDL was prepared by injecting an ethanolic solution (0.1 ml) containing trace amounts of [3H]DPPC (3.5 µCi) and [14C]cholesterol (4.3 µCi) into 4.6 ml of LDL solution as described previously (11, 12). PC and cholesterol transfer from LDL to HDL3 was determined by incubating, at 37 °C for 30 min, assay mixtures containing the labeled LDL (39 µg as protein) and acceptor HDL3 (445 µg as protein) in the presence of varying amounts of PLTP in a final volume of 280 µl in phosphate buffer containing NaCl. Lipid transfer between the donors and acceptors was terminated by selectively precipitating donor particles with dextran sulfate and MgCl2 (12). In both assay systems, the radioactivities in HDL3 (supernatant) were determined as described previously (12). Net mass transfer of cholesterol was determined by quantitating amounts of cholesterol present in the HDL supernatant solutions by the method of Gamble et al. (23).

Labeling of HDL3

HDL3 was labeled with [3H]acetic anhydride (specific activity, 400 mCi/mmol) at the acetic anhydride:lysine molar ratio of 0.1 as described previously (20, 24).

Density Gradient Centrifugation

A discontinuous sucrose density gradient was formed in 5.5-ml quick seal tubes (Beckman Instruments) by layering 2.4 ml of phosphate buffer, 1.2 and 0.9 ml of phosphate buffer/sucrose solutions of densities of 1.081 and 1.168 g/ml, respectively, and 1.0 ml of sample solutions adjusted to a density of 1.25 g/ml with sucrose. Samples were centrifuged at 75,000 rpm (354,000 × g) for 3 h at 4 °C in a vertical Beckman Vti80 rotor using a Beckman L8M-80 centrifuge (25). After centrifugation, 220-µl fractions were collected as described previously (25). The sucrose density gradient fractions were analyzed for PC and cholesterol by radioactivity determinations and for PLTP by the PC transfer assay. Densities were obtained by measuring refractive indices (26).

Binding Studies

Vesicles for the binding study contained 90 nmol of 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoylphosphatidylcholine, 0.09 nmol [3H]DPPC (3 µCi), and 30 nmol of [14C]cholesterol (2 µCi)/100 µl. It was assumed that the extent of transfer of the labeled DPPC, constituting 0.09% of total PC, is proportional to the extent of 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoylphosphatidylcholine transfer. Mixtures containing a constant amount of PLTP (2.4 µg) and varying amounts of [3H]PC/[14C]cholesterol vesicles in 200 µl of phosphate buffer/NaCl solution were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. The incubated mixtures were subjected to density gradient centrifugation at 354,000 × g for 3 h at 4 °C. Density gradient fractions collected were analyzed for PC and cholesterol by radioactivity and for PLTP by the PC transfer assay. The recoveries of samples determined by [3H]PC and [14C]cholesterol radioactivity ranged between 45 and 65%. Scatchard plots of PC and cholesterol binding to PLTP were obtained as given in the text. Computations of the binding were made in a similar manner as described for the binding of cholesteryl ester and triglyceride incorporated into PC vesicles to cholesteryl ester transfer protein (27).

Analytical Method

The protein content was determined by the method of Lowry et al. (28) with crystalline bovine serum albumin as the standard. Free cholesterol and phospholipid phosphorus contents were determined by methods previously described (12).


RESULTS

Cholesterol Transfer from PC-Cholesterol Vesicles to HDL3

The time dependence of PLTP-mediated cholesterol transfer was studied by using PC-[3H]cholesterol vesicles as the cholesterol donor and HDL3 as the acceptor in the presence of varying amounts of purified PLTP. The incubation was carried out at 37 °C for different periods. The rate of cholesterol transfer increased progressively during the incubation period of 10 min at 37 °C (Fig. 1, lines 2-4) in the presence of all concentrations of PLTP. An increase in nonspecific transfer during incubation was also given (Fig. 1, line 1). It is to be noted that the highest concentration of PLTP used in this assay, 560 ng/280 µl (2 µg/ml), roughly corresponds to the PLTP concentration in human plasma (12). The extent of transfer of labeled cholesterol by 560 ng of PLTP (Fig. 1, line 4) was approximately five times that of nonspecific cholesterol transfer (Fig. 1, line 1). Fig. 1, inset, shows magnitudes of PLTP-mediated transfer of labeled cholesterol (curve a) and cholesterol mass (curve b) at a 10-min incubation as a function of PLTP concentration. The radioactive cholesterol transfer as well as net mass transfer of cholesterol increased linearly up to the PLTP concentration of 200 ng. A further increase in the PLTP concentration resulted in deviation from linearity. The net mass transfer of cholesterol amounted to roughly 80% of the transfer of labeled cholesterol.


Fig. 1. Time course of PLTP-mediated cholesterol transfer from PC-cholesterol vesicles to HDL3. Vesicles containing 90 nmol of PC and 22.5 nmol of [3H]cholesterol/100 µl and HDL3 (180 µg as protein) were used as cholesterol donors and acceptors, respectively. The vesicle/HDL3 mixtures in 280 µl of phosphate buffer containing NaCl, ionic strength 0.16, pH 7.4, were incubated in the presence of 0 (line 1), 100 (line 2), 200 (line 3), and 560 ng (line 4) of purified PLTP for varying periods at 37 °C. The transfer reaction was terminated by precipitating the vesicles with 80 µl of 0.0085% dextran sulfate and 40 µl of 0.2% MgCl2. After standing for 20 min in an ice bath, the mixtures were centrifuged at 2,900 × g for 20 min. An aliquot of supernatant containing HDL3 was analyzed for its radioactivity. Correction for a trace amount of nonprecipitated vesicle radioactivity in the supernatant was made by subtracting the zero time values from the observed transfer values in the presence and absence of PLTP. The extent of cholesterol transfer was determined by using the equation given under "Experimental Procedures." The results presented are representative of three similar experiments carried out with different preparations of purified PLTP. Inset, the amounts of radioactive cholesterol (curve a) and cholesterol mass (curve b) transferred by varying concentrations of PLTP during incubation at 37 °C for 10 min were plotted against PLTP concentrations. Curve a was obtained by subtracting nonspecific transfer values in the absence of PLTP from the transfer values obtained in the presence of PLTP. Curve b shows a result representative of three similar experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (24K GIF file)]


The transfer of cholesterol from PC-cholesterol vesicles to HDL3 was also shown by density gradient centrifugation of the PC-cholesterol vesicle/HDL3 mixtures incubated in the presence and absence of PLTP for 10 min at 37 °C. The extent of nonspecific transfer occurring in the absence of PLTP was represented by the area given by the cholesterol radioactivity curve overlapping with the HDL3 protein radioactivity peak (Fig. 2A). In the presence of 560 ng of PLTP, the extent of cholesterol transfer from the vesicles to HDL3 was substantially enhanced, as shown by the increase in the area of the cholesterol radioactivity peak coinciding with the HDL3 protein radioactivity peak (Fig. 2B). The extent of cholesterol transfer from PC-cholesterol vesicles to HDL3 was approximated from the total peak areas of labeled cholesterol and the relative peak area of labeled cholesterol transferred to HDL3 after correcting for the area of nonspecific transfer. Approximately 14% of total cholesterol, or 3 nmol of cholesterol, was transferred. A net mass transfer of approximately 2.4 nmol of cholesterol could be expected on the basis of the relationship between the transfer of labeled cholesterol and net mass transfer (Fig. 1, inset). We observed that PLTP does not facilitate cholesterol transfer at 4 °C or in an ice bath. However, nonspecific transfer of cholesterol could occur at these temperatures although at considerably reduced rates.


Fig. 2. PLTP-mediated cholesterol transfer from PC-cholesterol vesicles to HDL3 determined by density gradient centrifugation. The vesicle/HDL3 mixtures were incubated for 10 min at 37 °C in the absence (A) and the presence of 560 ng of PLTP (B) in a final volume of 200 µl of phosphate buffer containing NaCl. After incubation, the samples in a sucrose density gradient were centrifuged in a vertical rotor. The distribution patterns of labeled cholesterol (open circle ) from PC/[3H]cholesterol vesicles and 3H-labeled HDL3 protein (bullet ) were determined from their radioactivities in collected fractions but obtained from separate experiments in which the sample mixtures contained only one radioactive component. The labeled protein (bullet ) distribution was obtained to indicate the position of HDL3 in sucrose density gradient centrifugation profiles. The total recoveries of cholesterol and HDL3 protein radioactivities in the assay mixtures were within the range of 65-75%. The compositions of vesicle/HDL3 mixtures used for density gradient centrifugation were the same as those of the assay mixtures for cholesterol transfer reaction. Results obtained from representative experiments are shown.
[View Larger Version of this Image (21K GIF file)]


Effect of Cholesterol Content of PC-Cholesterol Vesicles on the PLTP-mediated Cholesterol and PC Transfer

Although PC transfer from the vesicles to HDL3 by PLTP was inhibited by an increase in the cholesterol content of the donor vesicles (Fig. 3A; Refs. 12, 29, and 30), cholesterol transfer from the vesicles to HDL3 was increased by increasing the cholesterol content of the vesicles up to approximately 20 mol %. A further increase in the cholesterol content reduced the extent of cholesterol transfer (Fig. 3B). The relationship between mol % of cholesterol transferred to HDL3 and mol % of cholesterol in donor PC-cholesterol vesicles showed that the increase in the cholesterol content of vesicles progressively increased transfer of cholesterol given in mol % with respect to the sum of cholesterol and PC transferred to HDL3 (Fig. 4A). The ratio (C/(C + PC))transf/(C/(C + PC))v in Fig. 4B, ordinate, represents the ratio of mol % of cholesterol transferred to HDL3 to mol % cholesterol in the vesicles. This ratio was consistently reduced with an increase in the mol % of cholesterol in the donor PC-cholesterol vesicles (Fig. 4B).


Fig. 3. Effect of vesicle cholesterol content on the PLTP-mediated PC and cholesterol transfer from vesicles to HDL3. Vesicle preparations containing 90 nmol of 3H-labeled PC and 0-29 mol % of 14C-labeled cholesterol were used as the donors. The donor vesicles were incubated with acceptor HDL3 (180 µg as protein) in the presence and absence of 200 ng of PLTP for 10 min at 37 °C. The transfer assay was carried out in a similar manner as given for Fig. 1. The data given are representative of three similar experiments carried out by using different sets of vesicle preparations.
[View Larger Version of this Image (14K GIF file)]



Fig. 4. Relationship between the mol % of cholesterol in the donor vesicles and the mol % of cholesterol transferred to acceptor HDL3 by PLTP. The values on the ordinate in A represent mol % cholesterol transferred, with respect to the sum of cholesterol (C) and PC transferred by 200 ng of PLTP. (C/(C + PC))transf/(C/(C + PC))v on the ordinate in B represents the ratio of mol % cholesterol transferred to HDL3, with respect to the sum of cholesterol and PC transferred, to mol % of cholesterol in the donor vesicles. The data obtained for Fig. 3 were used for the calculation of the values given in A and B.
[View Larger Version of this Image (15K GIF file)]


Binding of Cholesterol and PC to PLTP

We demonstrated an actual uptake of cholesterol and PC molecules by PLTP from donor vesicles and subsequent donation of these bound lipids to acceptor particles (Fig. 5). Fig. 5A shows the distribution of labeled PC and cholesterol in control vesicles incubated in the absence of PLTP. Fig. 5B shows the profile of control PLTP as determined by the PC transfer activity. The incubation of vesicles with PLTP resulted in the transfer of a substantial amount of cholesterol and PC radioactivities to the PLTP (Fig. 5C). The PLTP fractions with bound lipids were collected and pooled. When one-third of the pooled PLTP fraction with bound lipids was recentrifuged alone, practically all of the PC and cholesterol radioactivity remained in association with the PLTP peak (Fig. 5D). However, the addition of unlabeled PC vesicles to the second one-third of the pooled fraction resulted in the transfer of most of the PC and cholesterol radioactivities to the vesicles (Fig. 5E). The addition of LDL to the last pooled fraction resulted in the transfer of about 40% each of labeled cholesterol and PC to LDL, whereas approximately 60% of PC and cholesterol radioactivity remained associated with PLTP (Fig. 5F). It appeared that PLTP-mediated cholesterol and PC transfer involved the uptake of lipid molecules by PLTP from donor particles and subsequent transfer of these lipids to the acceptor particles.


Fig. 5. Transfer of cholesterol and PC from [3H]PC/[14C]vesicles to purified PLTP and subsequent donation to unlabeled vesicles or LDL. Purified PLTP (2.4 µg) was incubated with vesicles containing 1.8 nmol of [3H]PC and 0.6 nmol of [14C]cholesterol in a final volume of 200 µl in phosphate buffer containing NaCl for 1 h at 37 °C. The mixtures were centrifuged in a sucrose density gradient in a similar manner as given for Fig. 3. Fractions collected after centrifugation were used to determine the distributions of PC (open circle ) and cholesterol (bullet ) radioactivities and PLTP distribution. A, PC and cholesterol radioactivity distributions for vesicles alone; B, PLTP activity for purified PLTP alone; C, distributions of radioactivities and PLTP activity for PLTP incubated with the vesicles. The fractions, 19-23 in C, showing [3H]PC and [14C]cholesterol radioactivities that coincided with free PLTP activity, were pooled and divided into three equal portions. One-third of the pooled fraction containing lipid-bound PLTP was subjected to recentrifugation in a sucrose density gradient (D). Second and last one-third portions were further incubated with unlabeled vesicles (90 nmol PC, E) or LDL (325 µg as protein, F) at 37 °C for 2 h and recentrifuged. All figures show the results obtained from representative experiments. The total recoveries of PLTP, PC, and cholesterol were within the range of 60-65%, except for the control PLTP (B), which gave only 40% recovery, due possibly to increased inactivation and loss in the absence of vesicles.
[View Larger Version of this Image (29K GIF file)]


For the binding study, we assumed that cholesterol partitioning between the outer and inner monolayer is 70:30 and that only cholesterol in the outer monolayer is subjected to exchange (31, 32). The Scatchard plots for cholesterol and PC binding to PLTP were obtained by determining the amounts of PC and cholesterol bound to PLTP obtained by sucrose density gradient centrifugation of the incubation mixtures containing PLTP and vesicles. The plot obtained for the PLTP incubated with the vesicles without cholesterol (Fig. 6A) gave an apparent Kd of 53 nM for PC and an apparent binding capacity of 70, in mol PC/mol PLTP. For the PLTP incubated with the vesicles containing cholesterol, the Scatchard plots were obtained for both PC binding (Fig. 6B) and cholesterol binding (Fig. 6C). The binding parameters obtained were an apparent Kd of 131 nM for PC and 373 nM for cholesterol and an apparent binding capacity, in mol lipid/mol PLTP, of 43 for PC and 13 for cholesterol.


Fig. 6. Scatchard analysis of PC and cholesterol binding to PLTP. Binding experiments were carried out as given under "Experimental Procedures." The PLTP-bound PC and cholesterol were computed from the distributions of labeled PC and cholesterol in the vesicles and PLTP fractions obtained by density gradient centrifugation and from the initial amounts of radioactivities used in the sample mixtures. A and B, Scatchard plots of PC binding to PLTP, in the absence and presence of cholesterol in the vesicles, respectively. C, Scatchard plot of cholesterol binding to PLTP. The data were subjected to a linear regression analysis. The apparent Kd and apparent binding capacity were estimated from the slope of the Scatchard plot and the ordinate intercept, respectively. The data given are representative of three separate experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (19K GIF file)]


Transfer of Cholesterol from LDL to HDL3

Although both PLTP-mediated cholesterol transfer (Fig. 7A) and PC transfer (Fig. 7B) from LDL to HDL3 increased with increases in the PLTP concentration, the extents of cholesterol and PC transfer from LDL to HDL3 were rather limited. After a 30-min incubation in the presence of 600 ng of PLTP in the assay mixtures, about 3.2 nmol of cholesterol was transferred by PLTP, compared with 10 nmol of nonspecific cholesterol transfer. The lower cholesterol transfer rate was not due to the method used for labeling LDL. When LDL was labeled with the filter paper method (33), the degrees of nonspecific and PLTP-mediated cholesterol transfer were similar to those obtained by the ethanol method used (11, 12). The magnitude of PLTP-mediated PC transfer from LDL to HDL3 (Fig. 7B) was greater than the cholesterol transfer (Fig. 7A).


Fig. 7. PLTP-mediated transfer of cholesterol from LDL to HDL3. LDL (39 µg as protein), doubly labeled with [3H]PC and [14C]cholesterol, and HDL3 (445 µg as protein) were used as the donor and acceptor, respectively. The assay incubation was carried out as described under "Experimental Procedures." A and B, PLTP-mediated cholesterol and PC transfer, respectively, obtained in the presence of increasing amounts of purified PLTP. The results presented are representative of three similar experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (16K GIF file)]



DISCUSSION

In the present study, we demonstrated that PLTP mediated a substantial transfer of not only PC, but also cholesterol from PC-cholesterol vesicles to HDL. The rate of cholesterol transfer from the vesicles to HDL was profoundly influenced by the cholesterol content of the donor vesicles (Fig. 3B). A progressive increase in the rate of cholesterol transfer, with an increase in the vesicle cholesterol content to 20 mol %, might have reflected increased availability of cholesterol in the vesicles. The decrease in the rate of cholesterol transfer at higher cholesterol contents might have been caused by decreased fluidity of the lipid interface, as was attributed to a decline in PC transfer with an increase in the cholesterol content of vesicles (29, 30). Incorporation of cholesterol into egg PC vesicles is well known to transform the disordered bilayer into an ordered structure (34, 35). We are currently investigating the binding of PLTP to the vesicles, as influenced by cholesterol, to clarify the mechanism of the cholesterol effect on the PLTP-mediated PC and cholesterol transfer.

We showed that PLTP indeed possessed a large number of binding sites for PC and cholesterol. On the basis of apparent binding capacity values of 43 mol of PC and 13 mol of cholesterol/mol of PLTP obtained from Scatchard plots, the particle mass of PLTP with maximum numbers of bound PC and cholesterol was found to be 117 kDa. PC and cholesterol contributed 29 and 4.3%, respectively, of the total mass on a weight basis. We assumed that the hydrated density of PLTP-lipid complex having maximal number of bound PC and cholesterol was 1.18 g/ml. By using a PL molecular volume of 1270 Å3, a free cholesterol molecular volume of 600 Å3 (36), and a presumed partial specific volume of PLTP-glycoprotein of 0.70 g/ml, the amount of hydrated water became 0.22 g/g PLTP-lipid complex. Then, the PLTP used for lipid binding, having a hydrated density of 1.22 g/ml, would contain 23% PC and 3% cholesterol on a weight basis, if they were the only lipids present at the same PL:cholesterol ratio. The extent of hydration water was considered proportional to the total mass of the PLTP-lipid complex. Our preliminary study indicated that purified PLTP indeed contained phospholipids and cholesterol. During the incubation for the binding assay at 37 °C for 1 h, radioactive phosphatidylcholine and cholesterol in vesicles could have equilibrated with those originally associated with the purified PLTP. The decrease in the hydrated density of PLTP fractions after incubation with vesicles was apparently due to an increase in the lipids bound to multiple binding sites of PLTP.

PLTP may shuttle PC and cholesterol molecules between donor and acceptor particles. We demonstrated not only the transfer of labeled PC and cholesterol from vesicles to PLTP, but also the transfer of the labeled lipids from the isolated PLTP fraction to unlabeled vesicles. Transfer of the bound lipids to LDL was also observed. Although the carrier mechanism may largely be responsible for the transfer, the involvement of the ternary complex of PLTP with acceptor and donor particles for the transfer cannot be eliminated. We previously observed that the rate of PLTP-mediated PC transfer from vesicles to HDL3 was considerably higher than that of PLTP-mediated PC transfer from LDL to HDL (12). Vesicles apparently served as efficient PC donors for PLTP. This was not the case for cholesteryl ester transfer protein, which transfers phospholipids in addition to neutral lipids among plasma lipoproteins. The rate of PC transfer by cholesteryl ester transfer protein from vesicles to HDL3 was low and was comparable with the rate of PC transfer from LDL to HDL3 (12). Furthermore, cholesterol transfer mediated by PLTP in the vesicle/ HDL assay system was about four times greater than that of the LDL/HDL system. The efficient transfer of both labeled PC and cholesterol by PLTP from vesicles to HDL3 apparently reflected the presence of multiple PC and cholesterol binding sites on PLTP. The binding of PLTP to vesicles may lead to the transfer of several molecules of labeled PC and cholesterol from vesicles to bound PLTP during a single successful encounter. The number of these lipids transferred from LDL to PLTP on the interaction between LDL and PLTP may be rather limited, due possibly to the surface properties of LDL. Cholesterol and phospholipids may be tightly packed in the LDL surface, with some phospholipids immobilized by association with apoB-100 (37).

It is possible that the transfer of labeled PC and cholesterol from the vesicles to PLTP is not likely to involve the direct transfer of intact vesicle segments. It may rather involve the transfer of vesicle PC and cholesterol to the multiple binding sites of PLTP governed by the affinities of PLTP for PC and cholesterol and the binding capacities for these components. This may be followed by the transfer of these bound, labeled lipids to acceptor HDL3. We observed that the increase in the cholesterol content of vesicles progressively decreased the ratio of mol % cholesterol transferred to HDL to mol % cholesterol in the vesicles, which is given by (C/C + PC)trans./(C/C + PC)v. (Fig. 4B). This ratio was approximately 0.8 for donor vesicles containing 7.7 mol % cholesterol, and about 0.6 when the vesicles contained 29 mol % cholesterol. Such a decline may reflect, in part, binding of cholesterol and PC to PLTP, as influenced by the cholesterol content of vesicles.

The present report described our observations on the PLTP-mediated transfer of PC and cholesterol as well as the binding of these lipids to PLTP. PLTP-mediated net mass transfer of phospholipids from very low density lipoproteins to HDL was previously reported (38). We showed PLTP-mediated stimulation of a net mass transfer of cholesterol from vesicles to HDL. PLTP may play an important role in the transfer of cholesterol and phospholipids from the redundant surface coat of lipolyzed, triglyceride-rich lipoproteins to HDL3 and possibly to the plasma membrane of the cells, such as hepatocytes, which are actively using the excess phospholipids and cholesterol. We recently observed that PLTP substantially enhanced the transfer of cholesterol from cultured fibroblasts to acceptor lipoprotein particles. The nature of PLTP involvement in the first step of reverse cholesterol transport will be described in our subsequent article.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by Grant HL-17597 from the National Institutes of Health, United States Public Health Service, and by funds from the Illinois Agriculture Experimental Station.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    To whom correspondence should be addressed: Burnsides Research Laboratory, University of Illinois, 1208 W. Pennsylvania Ave., Urbana, IL 61801. Tel. and Fax: 217-333-1876.
1   The abbreviation used are: PL, phospholipid; LDL, low density lipoprotein; HDL, high density lipoprotein; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PLTP, phospholipid transfer protein; DPPC, dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine.

Acknowledgments

We express our appreciation to Dan Klock, Alberto Romero, Lana Powers, Eunsin Kim, B. K. Bala, and Atique Ahmad for technical assistance.


REFERENCES

  1. Tall, A. (1995) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 64, 235-257 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. McLean, L. R., and Phillips, M. C. (1981) Biochemistry 20, 2893-2900 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Lange, Y., Molinaro, A. L., Chauncey, T. R., and Steck, T. L. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 6920-6926 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Liscum, L., and Underwood, K. W. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 15443-15446 [Free Full Text]
  5. Pattnaik, N. M., Montes, A., Hughes, L. B., and Zilversmit, D. B. (1978) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 530, 428-438 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Ihm, J., Harmony, J. A. K., Ellsworth, J., and Jackson, R. L. (1980) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 93, 1114-1120 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Morton, R. E., and Zilversmit, D. B. (1982) J. Lipid Res. 23, 1058-1067 [Abstract]
  8. Nishida, H. I., Arai, H., and Nishida, T. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 16352-16360 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Brewster, M. E., Ihm, J., Brainard, J., and Harmony, J. A. K. (1978) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 529, 147-159 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Tall, A. R., Abreu, E., and Shuman, J. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 2174-2180 [Free Full Text]
  11. Albers, J. J., Tollefson, J. H., Chen, C., and Steinmetz, A. (1984) Arteriosclerosis 4, 49-58 [Abstract]
  12. Tu, A.-Y., Nishida, H. I., and Nishida, T. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 23098-23105 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Jauhiainen, M., Metso, J., Pahlman, R., Blomqvist, S., van Tol, A., and Ehnholm, C. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 4032-4036 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Chajek, T., and Eisenberg, S. (1978) J. Clin. Invest. 62, 1654-1665
  15. Eisenberg, S., and Olivecrona, T. (1979) J. Lipid Res. 20, 614-623 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Patsh, J. M., Gotto, A. M., Jr., Olivecrona, T., and Eisenberg, S. (1978) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 75, 4519-4523 [Abstract]
  17. Tall, A. R., Krumholz, S., Olivecrona, T., and Deckelbaum, R. J. (1985) J. Lipid Res. 26, 842-851 [Abstract]
  18. Tall, A. R., and Green, P. H. R (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 2035-2044 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Nishida, H. I., Nakanishi, T., Yen, E. A., Arai, H., Yen, F. T., and Nishida, T. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 12028-12035 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Yamazaki, S., Mitsunaga, T., Furukawa, Y., and Nishida, T. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 5847-5853 [Free Full Text]
  21. Batzri, S., and Korn, E. D. (1973) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 298, 1015-1019 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Atzel, A., and Wetterau, J. R. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 10444-10450 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Gamble, W., Vaughan, M., Kruth, H. S., and Avigan, J. (1978) J. Lipid Res. 19, 1068-1070 [Abstract]
  24. Furukawa, Y., and Nishida, T. (1979) J. Biol. Chem. 254, 7213-7219 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Yen, F. T., and Nishida, T. (1990) J. Lipid Res. 31, 349-353 [Abstract]
  26. Muesing, R. A., and Nishida, T. (1971) Biochemistry 10, 2952-2962 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Swenson, T. L., Brocia, R. W., and Tall, A. R. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 5150-5157 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J. (1951) J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265-275 [Free Full Text]
  29. Damen, J., Regts, J., and Scherphof, G. (1981) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 665, 538-545 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Sweeny, S., and Jonas, A. (1985) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 835, 279-290 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Newman, G. C., and Huang, C. (1975) Biochemistry 14, 3363-3370 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Jonas, A., and Maine, G. T. (1979) Biochemistry 18, 1722-1728 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Simard, G., Loiseau, D., Girault, A., and Perret, B. (1989) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1005, 245-252 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Cogan, U., Shinitzky, M., Weber, G., and Nishida, T. (1973) Biochemistry 12, 521-528 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Demel, R. A., and Dekruyff, B. (1976) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 457, 109-132 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Edelstein, C., Kézdy, F. J., Scanu, A. M., and Shen, B. W. (1979) J. Lipid Res. 20, 143-153 [Free Full Text]
  37. Lund-Katz, S., and Phillips, M. C. (1986) Biochemistry 25, 1562-1568 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Tollefson, J. H., Ravnik, S., and Albers, J. J. (1988) J. Lipid Res. 29, 1593-1602 [Abstract]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.