Organization and Differential Expression of the Human Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1 Receptor Gene
EVIDENCE FOR THE ROLE OF THE CARBOXYL-TERMINAL TAIL IN RECEPTOR TRAFFICKING*

(Received for publication, July 16, 1996, and in revised form, October 9, 1996)

Lu-Min Wong Dagger , Scott J. Myers Dagger §, Chia-Lin Tsou Dagger , Jennifa Gosling , Hidenori Arai and Israel F. Charo Dagger par

From the Gladstone Institute of Cardiovascular Disease,  Department of Medicine, and the Dagger  Daiichi Research Center, University of California, San Francisco, California 94141-9100

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Two forms of the monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 receptors (the type A monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) receptor CCR-2A and the type B MCP-1 receptor (CCR-2B) have been recently cloned and found to differ only in their terminal carboxyl tails. Here, we report that the two isoforms are alternatively spliced variants of a single MCP-1 receptor gene. Sequencing of the gene revealed that the 47-amino acid carboxyl tail of CCR2B was located in the same exon as the seven transmembrane domains of the receptor, and the 61-amino acid tail of CCR2A was in a downstream exon. Examination of freshly isolated human monocytes by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction revealed that CCR2B was the predominant isoform and that message levels of both CCR2A and CCR2B decreased as the monocytes differentiated into macrophages. In stably transfected cell lines, CCR2B trafficked well to the cell surface, but CCR2A was found predominately in the cytoplasm. Equilibrium binding studies revealed that those CCR2A receptors that successfully trafficked to the cell surface bound MCP-1 with high affinity (Kd = 310 pM), similar to CCR2B. In signaling studies, both CCR2A and CCR2B mediated agonist-dependent calcium mobilization, as well as inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. Creation of chimeras between CCR2A and the human thrombin receptor revealed that the cytoplasmic retention of CCR2A was due to its terminal carboxyl tail. Progressive truncation of the carboxyl tail indicated that a cytoplasmic retention signal(s) was located between residues 316 and 349. These data indicate that the alternatively spliced form of the human MCP-1 receptor (CCR2A) binds MCP-1 with high affinity and is a functional receptor and that expression at the cell surface is controlled by amino acid sequences located in the terminal carboxyl tail.


INTRODUCTION

Chemokines are small (8-10 kDa), secreted basic peptides that are involved in the directed migration and activation of leukocytes (see Refs. 1, 2, 3, 4 for recent reviews). They can be divided into two groups based on the arrangement of the first two of four conserved cysteines. The alpha - or "C-X-C" branch is characterized by the presence of a single amino acid between the first two cysteines and includes interleukin-8 (IL-8),1 GRO (alpha , beta , and gamma ), NAP-2, and platelet factor 4. In the beta - or "C-C" branch, the first two cysteines are adjacent. Members of the beta -branch include monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, 2, and 3 (MCP-1, MCP-2, and MCP-3), RANTES (<UNL>R</UNL>egulated on <UNL>A</UNL>ctivation, <UNL>N</UNL>ormal <UNL>T</UNL> cell <UNL>E</UNL>xpressed and <UNL>S</UNL>ecreted), macrophage inflammatory proteins 1alpha and 1beta (MIP-1alpha and MIP-1beta ), and eotaxin. In general, C-X-C chemokines are chemotactic for neutrophils, whereas the C-C chemokines are chemoattractants for monocytes and lymphocytes. The recently identified peptide eotaxin is specific for eosinophils (5). A novel peptide, lymphotactin, which lacks the first and third cysteines, has been isolated from progenitor T cells (6) and may represent the first member of a third branch of the chemokine family.

We recently reported the cloning of two MCP-1 receptors, type A (CCR2A) and type B (CCR2B), that differed only in their terminal carboxyl tails, suggesting that they were derived from a single gene via alternative splicing (7). Inspection of the amino acid sequence of the type B carboxyl tail revealed a 32% identity with both the MIP-1alpha /RANTES receptor (CCR1 (8)) and the eotaxin receptor (CCR3 (9, 10)), as well as a 21% identity with CCR4 (11). In contrast, this region of CCR2A bore little resemblance to other chemokine receptors. In functional studies, both forms of the MCP-1 receptor conferred robust, agonist-dependent calcium mobilization in Xenopus oocytes (7). In human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293 cells, the type B receptor was shown to inhibit adenylyl cyclase and rapidly mobilize intracellular calcium via coupling to Galpha i (12). Signaling studies of the type A receptor, however, were hampered by its relatively poor surface expression in transfected cells.

To further elucidate the biology of CCR2A, we have cloned and sequenced the human MCP-1 receptor gene. We have examined the relative expression of CCR2A and CCR2B in monocytic cell lines and in human monocyte/macrophages and have established that the signal for cytoplasmic retention of CCR2A is found in its carboxyl tail. Finally, we report that type A receptors that successfully traffic to the cell surface bind MCP-1 with high affinity and couple to Galpha i to mediate signal transduction.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Reagents

MCP-1 was obtained from R&D Systems, Inc. (Minneapolis, MN). Indo-1 AM was purchased from Molecular Probes, Inc. (Eugene, OR). Lipofectamine, G418, and minimal essential medium with Earle's balanced salt solution were obtained from Life Technologies, Inc. M1 and M2 monoclonal antibodies to the Flag epitope were purchased from Kodak. Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody was purchased from Calbiochem. Flow cytometry grade FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody was from Zymed (South San Francisco, CA). Ficoll/Hypaque was from Pharmacia Biotech Inc. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody was obtained from Bio-Rad. Epitope-tagged thrombin receptor (13) was generously provided by Dr. Shaun Coughlin (University of California, San Francisco).

Isolation of Genomic Clones

A Lambda FIX II human genomic library (Stratagene, San Diego, CA) was screened with a full-length CCR2B cDNA probe under conditions of high stringency. A total of 1.3 million plaques were screened from which four independent clones were isolated. Hybridizations were carried out in 50 ml of 50% formamide, 5 × SSC, 0.1% Denhardt's, 0.1 mg/ml salmon sperm DNA, and approximately 5 × 106 cpm/ml radiolabeled probe at 42 °C for 14-20 h. The cDNA probe was labeled with [alpha -32P]dCTP by the random priming method (Prime-It kit, Stratagene) to a specific activity of 108-109 cpm/µg. Filters were prehybridized in the same solution at 42 °C for 1-2 h before addition of the probe. Membranes were washed by rinsing with 100 ml of an 0.2 × SSC, 0.1% SDS solution at room temperature for 30 min, followed by washing at 65 °C for 2 h. The positively hybridizing plaques were purified. From one clone (lambda FixII-A2), overlapping EcoRI and PstI fragments were subcloned into pBSSK and sequenced to generate a map of the gene. Restriction enzyme digests and sequence analysis of a second clone (lambda FixII-17A), as well as Southern hybridization analysis of all four genomic clone isolates, were performed to confirm our map of the MCP-1 receptor gene. The MCP-1 receptor genomic sequence has been deposited in GenBank (accession numbers U80923[GenBank] and U80924[GenBank]).

Construction of Epitope-tagged MCP-1 Receptors, MCP-1 Receptor Mutants, and Chimeras

The sequence encoding the "Flag" epitope (DYKDDDD) preceded by the prolactin signal sequence (MDSKGSSQKGSRLLLLLVVSNLLLCQGVVS) (13) was ligated onto the 5' end of the CCR2A and CCR2B cDNAs. These modified cDNAs were subsequently subcloned into the mammalian expression vector pcDNA3 (InVitrogen, San Diego, CA). MCP-1RA receptor mutants with the cytoplasmic tail terminating at either position 316 or 349 were made using standard PCR methods. Leucine to alanine point mutants were made as described (14). Thrombin/MCP-1 receptor chimeras were constructed using a two-step overlapping PCR mutagenesis procedure (15). The resulting PCR product encoded a chimeric receptor in which the first 371 amino acids were derived from the thrombin receptor (14), and the carboxyl terminus was derived from the end of the seventh transmembrane domain and carboxyl tail of either CCR2A or MCP-1R to give a thrombin/MCP-1 receptor junction of  ... IDPLIY/AFVGEK... . All constructs made by PCR were completely sequenced.

Isolation of Human Monocytes and Macrophages

Buffy coats were purchased from Irwin Memorial Blood Bank (San Francisco, CA). Human monocytes and macrophages were isolated and prepared as described (16). Cells were washed several times to remove the Percoll, and monocytes were quick frozen. The cells were greater than 80% monocytes, as determined by neutral red uptake. To obtain macrophages, monocytes were cultured in RPMI 1640 with 10% autologous serum for the indicated number of days.

mRNA Isolation and RT-PCR

mRNAs from monocytes, macrophages, and cultured cell lines were isolated using Trizol reagent (Life Technologies, Inc.) following the manufacturer's instructions. Total RNA was treated with RNase-free DNase (Boehringer Mannheim) at 0.1 units/µg total RNA at 37 °C for 15 min. RT-PCR was performed using a GeneAmp RNA PCR kit (Perkin-Elmer), according to the manufacturer's instructions, and 1 µg of DNase-treated RNA. PCR conditions for first strand synthesis were 42 °C for 15 min, 99 °C for 5 min, and 5 °C for 5 min using the Perkin-Elmer GeneAmp PCR system 9600. Second step PCR conditions were incubation at 95 °C for 105 s, 95 °C for 15 s, and 60 °C for 30 s. After 34 cycles, the reaction was terminated by heating to 72 °C for 7 min. The resulting products were analyzed on a 2% agarose gel. For detection of CCR2A and CCR2B, a common 5' primer was used in conjunction with two carboxyl tail-specific 3'-antisense primers. In control experiments using CCR2A and CCR2B plasmid DNA, we identified PCR primer pairs that amplified both receptors equally.

Transient and Stable Transfections

HEK-293 cells were grown in minimal essential medium with Earle's balanced salt solution as described (12). COS-7 cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Hyclone Labs, Logan, UT) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin, at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator. Both transiently and stably transfected cell lines were created using Lipofectamine according to the manufacturer's instructions. Transiently transfected cells were assayed 2 days after the introduction of plasmid DNA. Stable cell lines were obtained by growing transfected cells at low density for 2 days, followed by the addition of G418 (800 µg/ml). Surviving colonies were assayed by Northern blot, and clones expressing high levels of receptor RNA were expanded for further studies.

Flow Cytometry

Cells were detached using 1 mM EDTA, pelleted by centrifugation, and incubated with the M1 antibody to the Flag epitope in minimal essential medium/Earle's balanced salt solution at 1:1000 dilution at room temperature for 1 h, with shaking. Following incubation, cells were washed three times with PBS and resuspended in medium containing FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (Zymed) in the dark for 30 min at room temperature with shaking. Cells were washed three times, resuspended in PBS with propidium iodide (20 µg/ml), and analyzed for receptor expression by flow cytometry.

Immunofluorescence Microscopy

Cells were grown in six-well dishes (35 mm) and were used when 30-50% confluent. After removing the medium, the cells were washed once with PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (in PBS) for 15 min at room temperature, and washed twice for 5 min each in Quench solution (150 mM sodium acetate and 0.1% nonfat dry milk in PBS). To permeabilize cells, lysis buffer (Quench solution plus 0.5% Triton X-100) was added for 15 min. Cells were washed three times, 5 min each, in wash solution (15 mM sodium acetate, 0.1% nonfat milk) followed by incubation in primary antibody. Monoclonal antibody M1 was added at 1:1000 dilution (in wash solution) incubated for 1 h at room temperature, and the cells were washed three times, 5 min each, and incubated in the dark with FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody at 1:1250 dilution for 40 min. Following the incubation, the cells were washed three times for 5 min each, rinsed once in PBS, and mounted in Vectorshield (Vector, Burlingame, CA) with coverslips. Cells were viewed using a Bio-Rad MRC-600 Laser Scanning Confocal Imaging System.

Inositol Phosphate Formation Assay

Total inositol phosphate was measured as described previously (17).

Binding, Calcium Fluorimetry and Adenylyl Cyclase Assays

These assays were performed as described previously (12).

Quantitation of Cell Surface Receptors by ELISA

To compare surface expression of receptors in transiently transfected cells, ELISAs were done 2 days after transfection. Transfections were carried out in 24-well dishes, and each construct was examined in triplicate. For stable lines, 2 × 105 cells/well were plated in a 24-well dish 1 day before the assay. Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (in PBS) for 10 min on ice, washed twice in PBS, and incubated with M1 monoclonal antibody for 1 h at room temperature, as above. Cells were then rinsed once with PBS and incubated 30 min with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (second antibody). The cells were washed three times with PBS. Developing solution (1 mg/ml 2,2'-azinobis(3-ethylbenzthiazolinesulfonic acid), 0.1 M sodium citrate, 0.1 M sodium phosphate, pH 4.0, 1 µl/ml hydrogen peroxide) was added, and color development was read at 450 nm using a Vmax (Molecular Devices, Palo Alto, CA) microtiter plate reader.


RESULTS

Organization of the MCP-1 Receptor Gene

We have previously identified two MCP-1 receptor cDNAs (CCR2A and CCR2B) that differed only in the predicted amino acid sequence of their terminal carboxyl tails (7). To test the hypothesis that these cDNAs represented alternatively spliced variants of a single gene and to elucidate potential splicing mechanisms, we cloned the gene for the human MCP-1 receptor. Four independent genomic clones were identified by hybridization with the CCR2B cDNA probe. Overlapping EcoRI and PstI fragments from one clone, lambda FixII-A2, were subcloned into pBSSK and sequenced. Both isoforms of the receptor were encoded in three exons spanning approximately 7 kb of genomic sequence (Fig. 1).


Fig. 1. Structural organization of the MCP-1 receptor gene. Overlapping PstI and EcoRI fragments from the lambda FixII-A2 genomic clone were subcloned and sequenced to derive the genomic map shown. The gene spans a minimum of 7 kb. Exons are depicted as boxes. 5'- and 3'-UTRs of exons are represented by open bars. Solid and hatched bars represent coding domains of the receptor and carboxyl-terminal tails, respectively. The location of the putative seventh transmembrane domain (TM7) is denoted by an asterisk; the arrows pointing down identify the location of consensus polyadenylation sequences found at the 3' ends of both MCP-1 receptor cDNAs. Horizontal arrows indicate the location of PCR primers used in Fig. 2. The derivation of the mRNAs for CCR2B and CCR2A via excision of ~1.2 kb of sequence encompassing the CCR2B carboxyl tail and 3'-UTR are shown schematically at the bottom of the figure. DNA sequences at the 5' donor and 3' acceptor splice site junctions are indicated. Restriction sites shown are PstI (P); BglII (B); XbaI (X); EcoRI (E); and HindIII (H).
[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]


The 5'-untranslated region (UTR) of both isoforms is interrupted by a long intron (~3 kb) followed by a long exon (exon 2) of 1.9 kb that codes for the remaining 1.9-kb sequence of CCR2B mRNA. Exon 3 lies 260 bp downstream of the end of exon 2 and codes for the carboxyl-terminal tail and the entire 3'-UTR of the CCR2A isoform. Therefore, both forms of the receptor have identical 5' ends composed of exon 1 and the 5'-half (981 bp) of exon 2. The remaining 3'-half of exon 2 is absent from the CCR2A cDNA, giving rise to unique carboxyl tails (and 3'-UTR) in CCR2A versus CCR2B (Fig. 1, bottom). Strong consensus sequences for canonical 5' donor and 3' acceptor splice sites (18) were found at all proposed intron/exon splice junctions, including the two required to synthesize CCR2A (Fig. 1, bottom). Consensus AATAAA polyadenylation signal sequences were found ~20-45 bp upstream from the 3' end of both exon 2 and exon 3 (Fig. 1, arrows), although at the end of exon 2, these sequences are mismatched at one base. Analyses of positively hybridizing bands on Southern blots of the genomic clones, as well as human genomic DNA, were consistent with the physical map shown in Fig. 1 (data not shown).

Expression of CCR2A and CCR2B mRNA in Monocytes and Macrophages

To determine the relative expression of type A and type B MCP-1 receptor mRNAs in human monocytes and macrophages, we performed RT-PCR using an upstream (sense) primer corresponding to the seventh transmembrane domain and a downstream (antisense) primer derived from either the type A or type B receptor carboxyl tails. Preliminary reactions were performed using plasmid cDNAs and P1 genomic clones as templates, and primer pairs were selected that gave robust, reproducible, and comparable amplification of CCR2A and CCR2B. As shown in Fig. 2, amplification of CCR2A or CCR2B cDNAs with these primers resulted in PCR products of the expected size (281 and 485 bp, respectively), without detectable cross-reactivity. CCR2B was amplified in the monocytic THP-1 and MonoMac6 cell lines but not in the K562 erythroleukemia cell line (Fig. 2B). Freshly isolated human monocytes were also strongly positive by PCR. Macrophages were obtained by maintaining human monocytes in culture for up to 7 days, during which time their scavenger receptor activity (i.e. internalization of acetyl-low density lipoprotein, which is associated with monocyte to macrophage differentiation) increased (data not shown). Less PCR product was seen in the 7-day monocyte/macrophage cultures, suggesting that the CCR2B receptor mRNA levels had fallen. A similar expression pattern was seen for the type A MCP-1 receptor (Fig. 2A), although the PCR products were less abundant. Freshly isolated human monocytes and 3-day monocyte/macrophages were positive for CCR2A by PCR, and less product was seen in the 7-day macrophages. An additional band of approximately 1.4 kb was also detected using the primer specific for the type A receptor (Fig. 2A, top band). This size corresponds to mRNA from which the second intron has not been spliced, as evidenced by the identically sized band obtained in the P1 lambda phage clone (Fig. 2A, lane 9). This transcript would likely encode the type B MCP-1 receptor. The longer transcript was also seen in THP-1 and MonoMac6 cells but not in K562 cells. These data suggest that CCR2B is the predominant form of the MCP-1 receptor in both monocytic cell lines and human monocyte/macrophages and also indicate that receptor mRNA levels fall as monocytes mature into macrophages.


Fig. 2. Expression of CCR2A and CCR2B in human monocyte/macrophages. Total RNA isolated from human hematopoietic cell lines and monocyte/macrophages was assayed for the presence of CCR2A (A) and CCR2B (B) by RT-PCR. The sense (5') primer was derived from the seventh transmembrane domain, and two antisense (3') primers were derived from the coding region of the type A or type B carboxyl tails (see horizontal arrows in Fig. 1). PCR products of the size expected for the CCR2A and CCR2B cDNAs are indicated. Fully transcribed but unspliced mRNA was detected as a 1.4-kb PCR product (A). Untransfected HEK-293 cells (lane 1) were used as a negative control. HEK-293 cells stably transfected with CCR2B (lane 2) and CCR2A (lane 3) were used as positive controls. K562 cells (lane 4) are a human erythroleukemia cell line; THP-1 (lane 5) and MonoMac6 (lane 6) cells are human monocytic leukemia lines. Monocytes (lane 7) were prepared by centrifugation of freshly drawn blood over Ficoll-Hypaque, as described under "Materials and Methods." Macrophages were obtained by maintaining human monocytes in culture for 3 days (lane 8) or 7 days (lane 9). DNA from a P1 lambda phage clone (lane 10) was used as a positive control for the migration of unspliced mRNA.
[View Larger Version of this Image (24K GIF file)]


Expression of the Two Forms of the MCP-1 Receptor in Transfected Cells

In an attempt to identify functional differences between the two forms of the receptor, we transfected HEK-293 cells with cDNAs for CCR2A and CCR2B. To facilitate quantitation of receptor expression, we incorporated Flag epitopes (13) at the amino terminus of the receptor. Previous work from our laboratory has shown that incorporation of this epitope does not alter ligand binding or receptor activation (19). Analysis of multiple independent cell lines by flow cytometry revealed that CCR2B, but not CCR2A, was highly expressed at the cell surface (Fig. 3A). Similar results were obtained using immunofluorescence, which further revealed intense staining for CCR2A in permeabilized cells but not on the surface of intact cells (Fig. 3B). Western blot analysis indicated that CCR2A was at least as abundant as CCR2B in these cells (data not shown). These data indicated that whereas CCR2B was expressed at the cell surface and in the cytoplasm, CCR2A was found almost exclusively in the cytoplasm.


Fig. 3. Expression of CCR2A and CCR2B in transfected HEK-293 cells. A, surface expression of CCR2A and CCR2B on stably transfected HEK-293 cells was examined by flow cytometry. Shown are three independently derived lines for each receptor, as well as untransfected HEK-293 cells. B, immunofluorescence of HEK-293 cells expressing CCR2A or CCR2B. Surface expression is revealed in the non-permeabilized cells; intracellular expression is visualized in the permeabilized cells. The left side of each panel shows the immunofluorescent images; the right side shows the phase-contrast images.
[View Larger Version of this Image (62K GIF file)]


Thrombin/MCP-1 Receptor Chimeras

Since the two MCP-1 receptors differ only in their cytoplasmic tails, it was likely that sequences within the 61-amino acid carboxyl tail of the type A receptor were responsible for its low expression at the cell surface. To test this hypothesis, chimeras were created in which the cytoplasmic tails of either the type A or type B form of the MCP-1 receptor were ligated to the end of the seventh transmembrane domain of the human thrombin receptor. Trafficking studies of the thrombin receptor have previously shown that it is expressed at the cell surface, as well as in an intracellular pool (13, 20). cDNAs encoding the wild-type and chimeric receptors were transiently transfected into HEK-293 cells. Replacement of the carboxyl tail of the thrombin receptor with that of CCR2B resulted in a chimera that was expressed at the cell surface, as well as intracellularly (Fig. 4A). In contrast, when the cytoplasmic tail of CCR2A (amino acids 314-374 (7)) was used in place of the thrombin receptor tail, the chimera was not detected at the cell surface. Permeabilization of these cells revealed that this receptor was expressed at high levels in the cytoplasm (Fig. 4B) in a manner reminiscent of the distribution of wild-type CCR2A (see Fig. 3B). Cell surface expression of each of these constructs, quantitated by ELISA (Fig. 5), revealed that the CCR2A cytoplasmic tail reduced surface expression of the thrombin receptor to a level comparable with that of CCR2A. In contrast, replacement of the wild-type tail with that of CCR2B did not significantly reduce thrombin receptor expression at the cell surface. Similar results were obtained in transfected COS-7 cells (data not shown). These data indicate that the poor surface expression of CCR2A is attributable to its cytoplasmic tail and further suggest that sequences in this region contain trafficking information applicable to other seven transmembrane domain receptors.


Fig. 4. Expression of thrombin/MCP-1 receptor chimeras in transfected HEK-293 cells. The carboxyl-terminal tail of CCR2B or CCR2A was substituted for the corresponding region of the human thrombin receptor (ThR) to create the chimeras ThR/B and ThR/A, respectively. Transient transfections in HEK-293 cells were performed as described under "Materials and Methods." Immunofluorescence of non-permeabilized (A) and permeabilized (B) cells was detected, as described in Fig. 3.
[View Larger Version of this Image (78K GIF file)]



Fig. 5. Quantitation of surface expression of thrombin/MCP-1 receptor chimeras in transfected HEK-293 cells. Expression of receptors at the surface of non-permeabilized cells was determined by ELISA, as described under "Materials and Methods." The data are expressed as percentages of CCR2B expression. All data points were determined in triplicate. Error bars represent the standard deviations. Shown are the results of one of two similar experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (13K GIF file)]


CCR2A Cytoplasmic Tail Deletion and Mutation Analysis

To determine the amino acid sequences responsible for intracellular retention of CCR2A, two additional constructs were made with the cytoplasmic tail truncated at either position 349 or 316. We also prepared a construct in which the two leucine residues at positions 350 and 351 were changed to alanine. Surface expression of these altered receptors in transiently transfected cells was quantitated by ELISA (Fig. 6). In both HEK-293 and COS-7 cells, the surface expression of CCR2A was significantly lower than CCR2B. Removal of the carboxyl 25 amino acids of the cytoplasmic tail (CCR2A-349) reduced expression of the receptor to below that of the wild-type CCR2A. However, deletion of virtually all of the cytoplasmic tail (CCR2A-316) resulted in a receptor whose surface expression approached that of CCR2B. Mutation of the Leu-Leu motif to Ala-Ala (CCR2A-L/A) did not affect surface expression. These results suggest that the cytoplasmic tail of the CCR2A contains both positive (between 349 and 374) and negative (316-349) signals for cell surface expression. Immunofluorescence studies confirmed these results and further revealed intense cytoplasmic staining of cells transfected with CCR2A, CCR2A-349, and CCR2A-L/A (data not shown).


Fig. 6. Expression of carboxyl tail truncated CCR2A in HEK-293 cells. The carboxyl tail of CCR2A was truncated after amino acids 349 (CCR2A-349) or 316 (CCR2A-316). In a third construct, the two leucines at positions 350 and 351 of the full-length carboxyl tail were changed to alanines (CCR2A-L/A). Surface expression in transiently transfected HEK-293 and COS-7 cells was quantitated by ELISA as described in Fig. 5. Results are expressed as percentages of CCR2B expression. All data points were determined in triplicate, and error bars represent the standard deviations. Shown are the results of one of three similar experiments. The amino acid sequences of the carboxyl tails of CCR2A, CCR2A-349, and CCR2A-316 and the location of the LL-to-AA mutation are displayed below the graph.
[View Larger Version of this Image (19K GIF file)]


The truncation mutants were examined further in signaling experiments. In transiently transfected COS-7 cells, little phosphatidylinositol turnover was detected with wild-type CCR2A or either of the two carboxyl tail truncation mutants (Fig. 7). As recently shown by our group (17), co-transfection with the cDNA for the chimeric G-protein Gqi5 significantly enhanced agonist-dependent signaling of CCR2A. Signaling by CCR2A-316 was only comparable with that of CCR2A, despite the significantly higher surface expression of the truncated receptor. CCR2A-349, which was poorly expressed at the cell surface, did not signal as well as CCR2A. Given the robust surface expression of CCR2A-316 relative to wild-type CCR2A, these data suggest an important role for the receptor carboxyl tail in receptor coupling to G-proteins.


Fig. 7. Agonist-dependent phosphatidylinositol turnover in transfected COS-7 cells. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with cDNAs (1 µg/ml) encoding CCR2A, CCR2A-316, or CCR2A-349, in the presence or absence of the cDNA (0.5 µg/ml) for the chimeric G-protein Galpha qi5. Cells were loaded for 24 h with myo-[3H]inositol and incubated in the presence of 10 mM LiCl for 1 h at 37 °C with MCP-1 (100 nM). Total [3H]inositol phosphate was measured as described under "Materials and Methods." Each data point was determined in triplicate, and the data shown are the means (±S.D.) of five independent experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (23K GIF file)]


Ligand Binding and Signaling Characteristics of CCR2A and CCR2B

To further study signaling and ligand binding, we screened a number of stably transfected HEK-293 cell lines and identified those which had the highest levels of CCR2A (25-50% of CCR2B) at the cell surface. In equilibrium binding assays, 125I-labeled MCP-1 bound specifically to CCR2A-transfected cells (Fig. 8). Scatchard analysis of these data revealed a dissociation constant (Kd) of 310 pM, very similar to the Kd of 260 pM determined previously for binding to CCR2B (12).


Fig. 8. Binding of 125I-labeled MCP-1 to HEK-293 cells expressing CCR2A. Radiolabeled MCP-1 was added at the indicated concentrations to HEK-293 cells stably expressing the CCR2A receptor. Nonspecific binding was determined by the addition of 100-fold excess of unlabeled MCP-1 and was always <= 20% of the total binding. Specific binding was determined by subtraction of the nonspecific binding from the total binding. The dissociation constant (Kd), determined by Scatchard analysis (inset), was 310 pM. Shown are the results of one of three similar experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (17K GIF file)]


We have previously shown that the activation of type B MCP-1 receptor signals mobilization of intracellular Ca2+ in an agonist-dependent manner, with an EC50 value of approximately 3 nM (12). Agonist-dependent mobilization of intracellular calcium was also seen in CCR2A-transfected cells, although the magnitude of the calcium response was considerably reduced and the apparent EC50 was higher (30 nM) (Fig. 9). As was the case for CCR2B (12), the calcium flux was blocked by pretreatment of the cells with pertussis toxin (data not shown). CCR2A also inhibited adenylyl cyclase in response to MCP-1 binding (Fig. 10). As compared with CCR2B, the dose-response curve for inhibition of cyclase by CCR2A was shifted approximately 5-fold to the right, with IC50 values of 0.8 and 1.4 nM, respectively.


Fig. 9. Agonist-dependent calcium mobilization in HEK-293 cells expressing CCR2A and CCR2B. Stably transfected HEK-293 cells were loaded with Indo-1 AM, and intracellular calcium levels were measured as described under "Materials and Methods." Note the different scales on the ordinate. The EC50 for cells expressing CCR2B was approximately 7 nM and for cells expressing CCR2A was 30 nM.
[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]



Fig. 10. Inhibition of adenylyl cyclase by CCR2A and CCR2B. HEK-293 cells stably expressing CCR2A or CCR2B were labeled with [3H]adenine and incubated with 10 µM forskolin in the presence of the indicated concentrations of MCP-1. [3H]cAMP levels were determined as described under "Materials and Methods." The IC50 values for CCR2A were 0.8 and 1.4 nM and for CCR2B 0.13 and 0.17 nM. All data points were determined in duplicate. Shown are the results of one of three similar experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (19K GIF file)]



DISCUSSION

We have previously reported the cloning of cDNAs encoding two functional human MCP-1 receptors, designated CCR2A and CCR2B (7). Because these two receptors differed only in their terminal carboxyl tails, we speculated that they arose via alternative splicing of a single gene. Here, we report the organization of the MCP-1 gene and the identification of exons encoding the alternative carboxyl tails of CCR2A and CCR2B. We found that both forms of the receptor were present in human monocytes and macrophages and that the poor cell-surface expression of CCR2A was due to its terminal carboxyl tail. Finally, we have provided evidence that CCR2A receptors that do reach the cell surface are functional in ligand binding and signaling assays.

Sequence analysis of human genomic clones indicated that the MCP-1 receptor gene spans at least 7 kb, comprises 3 exons bounded by canonical splice site consensus sequences, and contains multiple polyadenylation signals at the 3' ends of exon 2 and exon 3. Whereas exon 1 encodes part of the 5'-UTR of both receptor isoforms, exon 2 encodes the entire open reading frame and 3'-UTR of CCR2B. Exon 3, on the other hand, codes for only the carboxyl tail and 3'-UTR of CCR2A. Near the center of exon 2 and at the beginning of exon 3 lie strong 5' donor and 3' acceptor splice site consensus sequences, respectively, that define the region of the gene removed to form CCR2A. Therefore, both isoforms share a common 5' end composed of exon 1 and the 5'-half of exon 2 but differ in their carboxyl tails and 3'-UTRs.

Regulation of expression of the alternative MCP-1 receptor transcripts may be controlled by recognition of alternative polyadenylation signals located at the end of exon 2 in a mechanism similar to that shown for the regulation of membrane-bound versus secreted forms of immunoglobulin µ chains in B lymphocytes (21, 22, 23). In the MCP-1 receptor gene, if exon 2 polyadenylation signals are recognized, cleavage and polyadenylation would be expected to produce CCR2B transcripts. However, if these signals are not recognized, mRNA synthesis would continue through exon 3, thus providing the 3' acceptor site necessary for the splicing and synthesis of CCR2A mRNA. In this case, full-length pre-mRNA encoding both carboxyl tail and 3'-UTR isoforms would be synthesized, and any regulation of MCP-1 receptor isoform expression would be predominantly controlled by the degree of splicing of these pre-mRNAs. Interestingly, in our earlier Northern blot analysis of THP-1 and MonoMac6 cell RNAs, the major hybridizing band detected by carboxyl tail-specific probes to both CCR2A and CCR2B was 3.5 kb (7). This is the transcript size predicted if both exons 2 and 3, in their entirety, are included in the mRNA and may imply that the majority of the mRNA retains the potential to be spliced to yield CCR2A. Examination of these blots also revealed the presence of lower molecular weight forms in the CCR2A but not the CCR2B lanes, consistent with a small amount of splicing to produce fully processed CCR2A (7).

We have used RT-PCR to examine the relative expression of CCR2A and CCR2B in monocytic cell lines and freshly isolated human monocyte/macrophages at the mRNA level. Quantitative determination of the expression of CCR2A and CCR2B at the protein level is not feasible at the present time because high affinity, carboxyl tail-specific antibodies are not yet available. CCR2B was readily detected in monocytic cell lines, as well as in freshly isolated human monocytes, whereas CCR2A was less abundant. To examine MCP-1 receptor expression in macrophages, human monocytes were maintained in culture for up to 7 days, during which time they differentiate into cells that morphologically resembled macrophages (16). At the same time, scavenger receptor activity increased in the macrophages, compared with freshly isolated monocytes, as expected (24). In the case of both the type A and type B MCP-1 receptors, mRNA levels fell as the monocytes differentiated into macrophages. Taken together, these data are consistent with earlier studies in which radiolabeled MCP-1 failed to bind to macrophages (25, 26, 27) and suggest a possible mechanism for limiting the mobility of macrophages at sites of inflammation or injury.

Significant differences were observed in the cell-surface expression of CCR2A and CCR2B. In a number of different transfected cell types, including HEK-293 cells, RAT-1 fibroblasts, COS-7 cells, Jurkat T cells, and RBL-2H3 basophilic cells, CCR2A was expressed at relatively low levels at the cell surface, as compared with CCR2B. CCR2A was synthesized in these cells, as revealed by the very abundant staining of the cytoplasm after permeabilization. A similar intracellular localization of a G-protein-coupled receptor has been observed for the Malpha 2-4H receptor (28) and has been postulated to represent a reserve pool of receptors that could be rapidly transferred to the plasma membrane. A significant intracellular pool of thrombin receptors has also been noted in both transfected cells and endothelial cells, and evidence for translocation of these receptors to the cell surface has been reported (20). The physiological significance of the intracellular pool of CCR2A receptors remains to be determined.

Through the creation of receptor chimeras, we found that the poor trafficking of CCR2A to the cell surface was due to its terminal carboxyl tail and that this region of CCR2A could cause retention of other seven transmembrane domain receptors in the cytoplasm. Further support for this hypothesis came from truncation studies, which revealed that removal of the carboxyl tail significantly increased surface expression, as compared with wild-type CCR2A, and implicated amino acids 317-349 as containing the signal(s) for cytoplasmic retention. Examination of the amino acid sequence of the CCR2A tail did not reveal the presence of known retention signals (29) but did reveal the presence of two adjacent leucine residues at positions 350 and 351. Di-leucine motifs function as internalization signals for some receptors, as well as sorting signals in the Golgi membrane (30, 31). For example, a di-leucine motif in the cytoplasmic tail contributes to lysosomal targeting and endocytosis of CD3 (32). Mutation of the leucines at positions 350 and 351 to alanines, however, had no effect on the cell-surface expression of CCR2A.

A limited number of transfected cell lines were identified in which CCR2A was expressed at the cell surface at 25-50% of the level of CCR2B. Permeabilization of these cells revealed extremely intense staining for CCR2A, and only in such lines was CCR2A detected on the cell surface at greater than 10% of the level of CCR2B. The type A receptors that were expressed on the cell surface bound MCP-1 with the same high affinity as CCR2B (12), mobilized intracellular calcium, and mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase in a dose-dependent manner. The reduced magnitude of the intracellular calcium response, as compared with CCR2B, and the approximately 5-fold increase in the IC50 for cyclase inhibition are likely due to the relative paucity of CCR2A at the cell surface. An alternative interpretation is that CCR2A couples less efficiently than CCR2B to G-proteins. In this regard, Hasegawa et al. (33) have reported that carboxyl tail splice variants of the G-protein-coupled EP3 receptor differed in their efficiency of coupling to Galpha i. In our case, the disparity in the number of cell-surface receptors precludes a more definitive interpretation of the data. Despite extensive efforts, we have not been able to isolate a transfected CCR2A cell line with surface expression equal to that of CCR2B. Therefore, the question remains unanswered as to whether differences in the carboxyl tails of the two forms of the MCP-1 receptor cause qualitatively different G protein coupling.

The biological significance of the existence of two forms of the MCP-1 receptor is not clear at this time, in part because we have not identified a cell that expresses CCR2A at high levels. There is precedent, however, for multiple isoforms of chemokine receptors. The two forms of the IL-8 receptor differ in their tissue distributions. IL-8RB is the predominant form in monocytes and lymphocytes, whereas IL-8RA and IL-8RB are present in equal amounts in polymorphonuclear leukocytes (34). Recently reported differences in the affinity of IL-8 for the two forms of the receptor have led to the suggestion that IL-8RB may be relatively more important for the initiation of chemotaxis (34). In contrast, the lower affinity of IL-8 for IL-8RA indicates that this receptor would only become activated in the presence of high concentrations of IL-8 (e.g. at sites of acute inflammation). Similarly, two isoforms of the thromboxane A2 receptor with alternatively spliced carboxyl tails have been found to differ in their tissue distribution (35). Our data suggest that CCR2B is the predominant form of the MCP-1 receptor in human monocytes and macrophages. It is possible that CCR2A is the major form of the receptor in other leukocytes or that its expression is increased upon activation of monocyte/macrophages. It is also possible that CCR2A will be found in non-hematopoietic cells. The elucidation of the structure of the MCP-1 receptor gene represents an important first step in understanding the role of this receptor in normal homeostasis and in response to infection or injury.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant HL52773 (to I. F. C.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) U80923[GenBank] and U80924[GenBank].


§   Present address: Dept. of Pharmacology, Emory University, 1510 Clifton, Atlanta, GA 30322-3090.
par    To whom correspondence should be addressed: Gladstone Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, P.O. Box 419100, San Francisco, CA 94141-9100. Tel.: 415-826-7500; Fax: 415-285-5632; E-mail: izzy_charo.gicd{at}quickmail.ucsf.edu.
1    The abbreviations used are: IL-8, interleukin-8; CCR, C-C chemokine receptor; CCR-2A, the type A MCP-1 receptor; CCR-2B, the type B MCP-1 receptor; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; HEK, human embryonic kidney; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1; MCP-1R, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 receptor; MIP-1alpha , macrophage inflammatory protein 1alpha ; RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; RANTES, regulated on activation, normal T expressed and secreted; UTR, untranslated region; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; bp, base pair(s); kb, kilobase pair(s).

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs. Robert Pitas and Karl Weisgraber for a critical reading of the manuscript, Dr. David Sanan for assistance with microscopy, John Carroll and Amy Corder for graphics and photography assistance, Angela Chen for manuscript preparation, and Gary Howard and Stephen Ordway for editorial assistance.


REFERENCES

  1. Oppenheim, J. J., Zachariae, C. O. C., Mukaida, N., and Matsushima, K. (1991) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 9, 617-648 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Rollins, B. J. (1991) Cancer Cells 3, 517-524 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Murphy, P. M. (1994) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 12, 593-633 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Schall, T. J. (1994) in The Cytokine Handbook (Thomson, A. W., ed), 2nd Ed., pp. 419-460, Academic Press, London
  5. Jose, P. J., Griffiths-Johnson, D. A., Collins, P. D., Walsh, D. T., Moqbel, R., Totty, N. F., Truong, O., Hsuan, J. J., and Williams, T. J. (1994) J. Exp. Med. 179, 881-887 [Abstract]
  6. Kelner, G. S., Kennedy, J., Bacon, K. B., Kleyensteuber, S., Largaespada, D. A., Jenkins, N. A., Copeland, N. G., Bazan, J. F., Moore, K. W., Schall, T. J., and Zlotnik, A. (1994) Science 266, 1395-1399 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Charo, I. F., Myers, S. J., Herman, A., Franci, C., Connolly, A. J., and Coughlin, S. R. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 2752-2756 [Abstract]
  8. Neote, K., DiGregorio, D., Mak, J. Y., Horuk, R., and Schall, T. J. (1993) Cell 72, 415-425 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Daugherty, B. L., Siciliano, S. J., DeMartino, J. A., Malkowitz, L., Sirotina, A., and Springer, M. S. (1996) J. Exp. Med. 183, 2349-2354 [Abstract]
  10. Ponath, P. D., Qin, S., Post, T. W., Wang, J., Wu, L., Gerard, N. P., Newman, W., Gerard, C., and Mackay, C. R. (1996) J. Exp. Med. 183, 2437-2448 [Abstract]
  11. Power, C. A., Meyer, A., Nemeth, K., Bacon, K. B., Hoogewerf, A. J., Proudfoot, A. E. I., and Wells, T. N. C. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 19495-19500 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Myers, S. J., Wong, L. M., and Charo, I. F. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 5786-5792 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Ishii, K., Hein, L., Kobilka, B., and Coughlin, S. R. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 9780-9786 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Kunkel, T. A. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 488-492 [Abstract]
  15. Ho, S. N., Hunt, H. D., Horton, R. M., Pullen, J. K., and Pease, L. R. (1989) Gene (Amst.) 77, 51-59 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Zimmerli, S., Majeed, M., Gustavsson, M., Stendahl, O., Sanan, D. A., and Ernst, J. D. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 132, 49-61 [Abstract]
  17. Arai, H., and Charo, I. F. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 21814-21819 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Mount, S. M. (1982) Nucleic Acids Res. 10, 459-472 [Abstract]
  19. Monteclaro, F. S., and Charo, I. F. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 19084-19092 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Hein, L., Ishii, K., Coughlin, S. R., and Kobilka, B. K. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 27719-27726 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Danner, D., and Leder, P. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 8658-8662 [Abstract]
  22. Early, P., Rogers, J., Davis, M., Calame, K., Bond, M., Wall, R., and Hood, L. (1980) Cell 20, 313-319 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Rogers, J., Fasel, N., and Wall, R. (1986) Mol. Cell. Biol. 6, 4749-4752 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Fogelman, A. M., Haberland, M. E., Seager, J., Hokom, M., and Edwards, P. A. (1981) J. Lipid Res. 22, 1131-1141 [Abstract]
  25. Yoshimura, T., and Leonard, E. J. (1990) J. Immunol. 145, 292-297 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Audran, R., Lesimple, T., Delamaire, M., Picot, C., Van Damme, J., and Toujas, L. (1996) Clin. Exp. Immunol. 103, 155-160 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Denholm, E. M., and Stankus, G. P. (1995) Cytokine 7, 436-440 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. von Zastrow, M., Link, R., Daunt, D., Barsh, G., and Kobilka, B. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 763-766 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Nilsson, T., Jackson, M., and Peterson, P. A. (1989) Cell 58, 707-718 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Dietrich, J., Hou, X., Wegener, A.-M. K., and Geisler, C. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 2156-2166 [Abstract]
  31. Haney, P. M., Levy, M. A., Strube, M. S., and Mueckler, M. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 129, 641-658 [Abstract]
  32. Letourneur, F., and Klausner, R. D. (1992) Cell 69, 1143-1157 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Hasegawa, H., Negishi, M., and Ichikawa, A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 1857-1860 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Chuntharapai, A., Lee, J., Hébert, C. A., and Kim, K. J. (1994) J. Immunol. 153, 5682-5688 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Raychowdhury, M. K., Yukawa, M., Collins, L. J., McGrail, S. H., Kent, K. C., and Ware, J. A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 19256-19261 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.