©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Expression of the Smooth Muscle Cell Calponin Gene Marks the Early Cardiac and Smooth Muscle Cell Lineages during Mouse Embryogenesis (*)

(Received for publication, October 25, 1995; and in revised form, January 2, 1996)

Joseph M. Miano (§) Eric N. Olson (¶)

From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

Although several genes are considered markers for vascular smooth muscle cell (SMC) differentiation, few have been rigorously tested for SMC specificity in mammals, particularly during development where considerable overlap exists between different muscle gene programs. Here we describe the temporospatial expression pattern of the SMC calponin gene (formerly h1 or basic calponin) during mouse embryogenesis and in adult mouse tissues and cell lines. Whereas SMC calponin mRNA expression is restricted exclusively to SMCs in adult tissues, during early embryogenesis, SMC calponin transcripts are expressed throughout the developing cardiac tube as well as in differentiating SMCs. Transcription of the SMC calponin gene initiates at two closely juxtaposed sites in the absence of a consensus TATAA or initiator element. Transient transfection assays in cultured SMC demonstrated that high level SMC calponin promoter activity required no more than 549 nucleotides of 5` sequence. In contrast to the strict cell type-specificity of SMC calponin mRNA expression, the SMC calponin promoter showed activity in several cell lines that do not express the endogenous SMC calponin gene. These results demonstrate that SMC calponin responds to cardiac and smooth muscle gene regulatory programs and suggest that the cardiac and smooth muscle cell lineages may share a common gene regulatory program early in embryogenesis, which diverges as the heart matures. The finding that the isolated SMC calponin promoter is active in a wider range of cells than the endogenous SMC calponin gene also suggests that long-range repression or higher order regulatory mechanism(s) are involved in cell-specific regulation of SMC calponin expression.


INTRODUCTION

The discovery of cell-specific transcription factors that trigger differentiation in skeletal and cardiac muscle has led to a search for similar regulatory factors in smooth muscle cells (SMCs), (^1)whose differentiation program is impaired during the course of intimal disease(1) . Although several transcription factors have been documented in SMCs(2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8) , none display the specificity commonly associated with factors that control cell identity by activating batteries of cell-specific genes(9) . Given the similarities between skeletal, cardiac, and smooth muscle cells, it is reasonable to anticipate that these different muscle cell types may share certain aspects of a myogenic gene regulatory program.

In contrast to skeletal and cardiac muscle, which are derived from distinct populations of mesodermal precursor cells, SMCs arise throughout the embryo from diverse precursor cell types. The mechanisms that specify the SMC phenotype and the embryonic origins of the many different types of SMCs remain unclear. There have been relatively few studies that have examined the temporospatial patterns of expression of SMC-specific genes during embryogenesis. However, the few SMC genes that have been examined have been found to exhibit different expression patterns. Smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SMMHC), for example, is expressed only in the SMC lineage, appearing initially in the dorsal aorta at 10.5 days postcoitum(10) . In contrast, smooth muscle alpha-actin (SM alpha-actin) is expressed in the cardiac, skeletal, and smooth muscle cell lineages during embryogenesis and in the adult (11, 12, 13, 14) . SM22alpha is also expressed in cardiac, skeletal, and smooth muscle cells in the embryo before becoming restricted to SMCs late in embryogenesis(14, 15) . Dissection of the cis-acting regulatory elements associated with these and other SMC genes will be an important step toward understanding the similarities and differences in the myogenic regulatory programs in the three major muscle cell types.

One approach to identify SMC-specific regulatory factors is to analyze promoters of genes that are unique to SMC lineages. The best studied SMC promoter is that of SM alpha-actin(16, 17) . Defining SMC-specific transcription factors that activate the SM alpha-actin promoter, however, is complicated by its expression in multiple cell types during embryogenesis and in the adult(11, 12, 13) . In addition to SM alpha-actin, other SMC gene promoters have been cloned and partially characterized including elastin(18) , SMMHC(19) , and SM22alpha(15, 20) . As yet, no cis elements have been shown to confer SMC-specific expression of these promoters.

Calponin is a thin filament-associated protein that apparently functions as a negative regulatory element for SMC contraction(21) , but may also have more broad cellular activities independent of contractility(22) . Three distinct mammalian calponin genes have been described based on their expression and nucleotide sequence differences (23, 24, 25) . Whereas much effort has been directed toward understanding the function of different calponin proteins, relatively little is known about their specificity of mRNA expression. Based on studies conducted with antisera and cDNA probes, calponin was shown to predominate in SMCs(23, 26, 27) , but was also present in other cell types(28, 29) . These studies, however, could not adequately distinguish between the three calponin genes. A similar problem was recently approached with respect to SMMHC mRNA expression using stringent assays for the unambiguous assignment of this marker to only SMC lineages(10) .

In this study, we examined the temporospatial expression pattern of the basic or h1 calponin (hereafter referred as SMC calponin) during mouse embryogenesis and in adult mouse tissues. Our results demonstrate that SMC calponin is strictly specific for adult SMCs, but that during embryogenesis it is expressed throughout the early cardiac tube. While the SMC calponin gene is expressed exclusively in SMC lineages and embryonic heart, its promoter, which lacks core sequence elements typical of other muscle genes, displays activity in cell lines that do not express the endogenous transcript. These results reveal similarities between the cardiac and smooth muscle gene regulatory programs during early embryogenesis and suggest that complex mechanisms govern the cell type-specific expression of SMC calponin.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell Culture

The culture conditions for many of the cell lines analyzed here have been described previously(10) . Primary rat aortic SMCs (RASMC) were obtained by a modified explant protocol(30) . Briefly, rat aortae were rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline, carefully stripped of adherent periaortic fat and endothelium, and subjected to a 20-min digestion in 1% collagenase, 0.25% type II elastase, and 1% soybean trypsin inhibitor as described(31) . Vessels were then rinsed in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and aseptically cut into small rings. The rings were placed under sterile coverslips in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 2 mML-glutamine for 5-7 days. The cells were routinely split 1:5 and maintained in the same medium. The identity of our RASMC cultures was verified by virtue of their mRNA expression of SMC calponin (below) as well as SMMHC, SM22alpha, and SM alpha-actin. (^2)Rat L6 skeletal myoblasts and A7r5 rat aortic SMC were maintained in the same medium as primary RASMC.

SMC Calponin Probes

Restriction enzyme-clamped PCR primers to the 5` ends of mouse (24) and rat (32) SMC calponin were created with a Beckman 1000 oligonucleotide synthesizer (Fullerton, CA) and used to amplify the corresponding calponin fragment from a previously described (10) mouse uterine cDNA library or a similarly constructed rat aortic cDNA library. The sequence of the primers containing the underlined restriction sites were as follows: (a) mouse 5` forward primer, 5`-gatacgaattcagagggtgcagacggaggctc-3`; (b) mouse 3` reverse primer, 5`-gatacaagctttcaatccactctctcagctcc-3`; (c) rat 5` forward primer, 5`-gatacgaattcatgtcttccgcacactttaac-3`; (d) rat 3` reverse primer, 5`-gatacaagctttgaccttcttcacagatcccg-3`. The length of each calponin probe was, respectively, for mouse and rat calponin, 195 nt and 200 nt. These clones were ligated into the EcoRI/HindIII sites of the Bluescript SK+ vector (Stratagene; La Jolla, CA), sequenced on both strands with Sequenase II (U. S. Biochemical Corp., Cleveland, OH), and utilized for RNase protection, in situ hybridization, or genomic screening as described below.

RNase Protection Assay

Tissue and cell culture RNA were harvested by the acid guanidinium thiocyanate/phenol method(33) . RNA samples from PC12 and HepG2 cells were kindly provided by Keith Ligon. All SMC calponin clones were linearized with NotI and in vitro transcribed using T7 polymerase (Ambion, Austin, TX) in the presence of [alpha-P]UTP (800 Ci/mmol; Amersham). Approximately 15 µg of total RNA was hybridized to each radiolabeled riboprobe according to the manufacturer's instructions (Ambion RPA II). In some experiments, a 157-nt 3`-untranslated region riboprobe corresponding to the murine SM alpha-actin cDNA (34) or an 18 S riboprobe (Ambion) was co-hybridized with the SMC calponin riboprobe. Protected fragments were resolved in a 5% polyacrylamide, 7 M urea gel and visualized following autoradiographic exposure (Kodak X-Omat AR; Rochester, NY).

Western Blotting

A monoclonal antibody to SMC calponin (clone hCP; Product No. C-2687) was purchased from Sigma and used to test for the presence of SMC calponin protein in a number of cell types. Briefly, cells were washed 3 times in phosphate-buffered saline, scraped in extraction buffer(35) , sheared 10 times through a 22-gauge needle, and boiled for 10 min. After spinning 10 min in a microcentrifuge, equivalent volumes of supernatant were loaded on a 10% polyacrylamide gel and stained with Coomassie Blue to verify protein integrity and equal loading. In a separate gel, resolved proteins were electroblotted to a nylon membrane (Zeta Probe; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and blocked in buffered 5% non-fat milk (35) for 1 h at room temperature. The blot was then incubated with the monoclonal calponin antibody at a dilution of 1:2500 in buffered 1% non-fat milk and rocked for 1 h at room temperature. The blot was washed in buffered 1% nonfat milk and then incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-linked secondary anti-mouse IgG (Sigma) at a dilution of 1:1000 for 1 h at room temperature. After washing in buffered 1% nonfat milk, the SMC calponin was detected with an enhanced chemiluminescent kit (RPN 2108; Amersham) followed by exposure to hyperfilm-MP (Amersham).

In Situ Hybridization

Adult heart, skeletal muscle, small intestine, and uterus as well as staged mouse embryos were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, dehydrated, and embedded in paraplast. Sections (8-10 µ) were mounted onto triple washed silane-coated glass slides (HCS Inc., Glen Head, NY) and processed for in situ hybridization as described previously(10) . Adjacent sections of 9.5- and 13.5-day embryos were hybridized with either a riboprobe corresponding to mouse SMMHC (10) or mouse SMC calponin (see above). Slides were dipped in emulsion (Kodak NBT-2; Rochester, NY) and exposed for 9 days at 4 °C before developing. Developed slides were subjected to darkfield microscopy for analysis and photography (Nikon SMZ-U Zoom 1:10).

Genomic Screening and Sequencing

The XL 1-Blue MRA(P2) strain of bacteria (Stratagene) was used to generate 4 times 10^4 recombinants/plate of the SV129 mouse genomic library (Stratagene). About 500,000 recombinants (1.5 genomic equivalents) were lifted in duplicate onto nitrocellulose filters (Schleicher & Schuell), denatured, and neutralized as described (35) and then prehybridized for at least 6 h in 50% formamide, 5 times SSC, 5 times Denhardt's, 0.5% SDS, and 200 µg/ml salmon sperm DNA at 42 °C. The 195-nt mouse SMC calponin probe described above was random prime-labeled (Boehringer Mannheim) in the presence of [alpha-P]dCTP (3000 Ci/mmol; Amersham) and added to the prehybridization mixture for an additional 16 h. Filters were washed at high stringency (final wash 0.1 times SSC, 0.1% SDS at 60 °C) to select for the SMC calponin gene. A total of 16 positive clones were detected after primary screening. Two clones of 18 (CALP-5) and 14 kilobase pairs (CALP-8) were plaque purified by multiple rounds of screening using freshly labeled probe. Restriction digest analysis of these clones revealed they were independent but overlapping (see Fig. 4). Genomic Southern blotting of the CALP-5 and CALP-8 clones with DNA derived from the liver of an SV129 mouse verified the authenticity of both clones.^2


Figure 4: Partial map of two SMC calponin genomic clones and structure of the SMC calponin gene. From 16 plaque pure clones, two (CALP-8 and CALP-5) were extensively analyzed by PCR and restriction digestion. The SMC calponin gene, shown schematically within the CALP-5 clone, is about 9.5 kilobase pairs in length and is comprised of seven exons. The arrow in exon I denotes the initiation of translation. Abbreviations are: H, HindIII; S, SacI; and X, XbaI.



The CALP-5 clone was cut with SacI and all fragments subcloned into Bluescript SK+ (Stratagene) for further restriction mapping and sequencing. These analyses coupled with PCR indicated that the CALP-5 clone harbored all of the SMC calponin coding sequence. Therefore, this clone was sequenced in its entirety on both strands with an ABI 373A automated DNA sequencer (Foster City, CA). The sequence has been deposited in GenBank (accession number U28932).

Transcription Initiation Site Mapping

Three independent assays were performed to map the SMC calponin transcription initiation sites. First, two negative strand-specific primers were synthesized for primer extension of total RNA from uterus, stomach, or liver. One primer was synthesized 5` of the first intron (5`-cagacaagccgtaggcaggacc-3`) and the other 3` of the first intron (5`-cgctgatggtcgtatttctgggccag-3`). These primers were 5` end-labeled with [-P]ATP (3000 Ci/mmol; Amersham) using T4 polynucleotide kinase (Boehringer Mannheim) and annealed (300 mM NaCl, 40 mM Tricine, pH 8.0, and 0.1 mM EDTA) to 25 µg of total RNA from the above mouse tissues at 65 °C for 10 min as described(36) . Following annealing, the samples were transferred to a 48 °C bath and extension was carried out for 1 h with SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Bethesda Research Laboratories) in a final volume of 20 µl. Reactions were stopped by adding 60 µl of dH(2)O, 70 µl of 5 M NH(4)OAc, and 2 µl of 0.5 M EDTA and precipitated in 500 µl of ethanol. Dried samples were resuspended in 10 µl of Sequenase stop solution (U. S. Biochemical), denatured at 75 °C, and resolved in a 6% polyacrylamide, 8 M urea gel. A sequencing ladder using a calponin cDNA clone with the same primer as that used to anneal the RNA was loaded adjacently to the primer extension reactions for fine mapping of the start sites.

RNase protection analysis and 5` RACE were used in conjunction with primer extension for mapping the start sites. For RNase protection, total RNA was hybridized to one of two independent riboprobes (see Fig. 5A) and the protected fragments resolved in a 5% polyacrylamide, 7 M urea gel. Sequencing reactions of a calponin cDNA were carried out using primers to the 3` most end of each riboprobe. Total RNA from uterus or liver was also subjected to 5` RACE according to the manufacturer's instructions (BRL). A final nested PCR was performed using the 5` anchor primer provided in the kit (BRL) and a 3` SMC calponin-specific primer, 5`-cagacaagccgtaggcaggacc-3`. A total of 10 RACE products were sequenced, two of which are presented in Fig. 5D.


Figure 5: Transcription initiation site mapping of the SMC calponin gene. Schematic (A) of SMC calponin 5` sequence including the initiating ATG of exon I, intron I (denoted by the broken line), and a portion of exon II. The arrows on the gene indicate the position of the primers used for primer extension (B; PXT) or 5` RACE (D). The probes used for RNase protection (C) are shown below the gene. P1 is a 258-nt riboprobe that protects a 142- and 139-nt fragment of the SMC calponin gene (C). Note that the 3` end of P1 was used as a primer for PXT which yielded two bands (B) of the same size as that with the P1 riboprobe. The P2 probe, which represents the original PCR clone used for tissue/cell line RNase protections and in situ hybridizations, is a 195-nt riboprobe that protects fragments of 195 and 192 nt (C). The 5` RACE products, whose sequences are shown in D, were obtained by nested PCR using a primer (arrow in schematic) described under ``Materials and Methods.'' The poly(G) tail represents the 5` end of the two SMC calponin cDNAs. E, sequence around the two transcription initiation sites, designated S(1) and S(2). Note the absence of a consensus TATAA element 20-30 nt upstream of S(1). The initiating ATG for translation is boxed .



Generation of Calponin Promoter Constructs

All promoter constructs were derived from a 2301-nt PCR fragment of the 5` end of genomic clone CALP-5. BamHI sites were engineered at the 5` and 3` ends of this fragment for cloning into Bluescript. The 2301-nt BamHI fragment, which included 60 nt of untranslated exon one sequence and 2251 nt of 5` promoter sequence, was then cloned into the BglII site of pGL3 basic luciferase (Promega, Madison, WI) to generate -2251 CALPLuc. A BamHI/HindIII digest of the 2301-nt PCR product generated a 549-nt deletion construct that was filled in and blunt cloned into the SmaI site of pGL3 basic to generate -549 CALPLuc. A BamHI/NcoI digest of the 2301-nt PCR product generated a 1342-nt deletion that was filled in and blunt cloned into the SmaI site of pGL3 basic to generate -1342 CALPLuc. The -3000 CALPLuc promoter construct was generated by ligating a 2.4-kilobase pair HindIII promoter fragment adjacent to the -549 CALPLuc deletion construct. Finally, the -115 CALPLuc deletion construct was generated by PCR using BamHI sites at both ends for cloning into the BglII site of pGL3 basic. All promoter constructs were sequenced to confirm their proper orientation in the pGL3 basic luciferase reporter vector as well as to verify the absence of any errors introduced by Taq polymerase. The promoterless pGL3 basic vector and the pGL3 control vector containing the SV40 promoter/enhancer were used as controls to normalize each promoter construct's activity.

Transfections and Luciferase Assay

All transfections were done using a calcium phosphate precipitation method(37) . Cells (A7r5, L6 myoblasts, C2C12, 10T1/2, and F9 teratocarcinoma) were grown in 100-mm dishes (Falcon) according to the supplier's specifications (American Type Culture Collection, Bethesda, MD) and transfected at 50% confluence with 10 µg of plasmid DNA. Primary RASMC were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal bovine serum and used between passage 15 and 30. Although the cell lines grow at different rates, every effort was made to transfect approximately equivalent cell numbers between lines. In some experiments, a plasmid carrying the beta-galactosidase gene was cotransfected to correct for varying transfection efficiencies between cell lines.

Transfections were typically carried out for 12-16 h followed by 48 h of recovery and growth. Cells were harvested in cold phosphate-buffered saline, spun down, and resuspended in 200 µl of 0.25 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.8. Cell lysates were then briefly sonicated, spun down and stored at -80 °C before use. Neither mild sonication nor multiple freeze thawing influenced luciferase activity.^2 Total protein was measured by the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad). Luciferase activity was assayed according to the manufacturer's specifications (Promega). A Turner Model 20 luminometer was used to measure the light reactivity of firefly luciferase. The relative light units were then normalized to total protein and expressed as a percent of the normalized luciferase activity obtained with the pGL3 control vector, which contains the SV40 promoter/enhancer (Promega). The data reflect the means (±S.E.) of at least four independent experiments done in duplicate.


RESULTS

SMC Calponin Transcripts in Adult Mouse Tissues and Cell Lines

RNase protection assays were performed to accurately assess the specificity of SMC calponin mRNA expression in adult mouse tissues and a variety of cell lines. Consistent with previous reports (21, 24) , SMC calponin transcripts were restricted to adult mouse tissues with a SMC component (Fig. 1A). Upon overexposure, however, transcripts were detected in most tissues due to the presence of blood vessels (see below). In cultured cells, SMC calponin was expressed in proliferating BC(3)H1 cells, which have been reported to exhibit properties of smooth and skeletal muscle, and only weakly in the differentiated P19 embryonal carcinoma cell line, which also has the potential to differentiate into smooth muscle (38) (Fig. 1B). Interestingly, SMC calponin mRNA expression was extinguished in differentiated BC(3)H1 cells (Fig. 1B). No other mouse lines examined expressed SMC calponin mRNA including 3T3, 10T1/2, C2, F9, and embryonic stem cells (Fig. 1B). These findings contrast with the expression of SM alpha-actin, which was expressed in most cell lines analyzed (Fig. 1B).


Figure 1: Specificity of SMC calponin mRNA and protein. A, 15 µg of total RNA from each adult mouse tissue was hybridized to both a SMC calponin and an 18 S rRNA riboprobe as described under ``Materials and Methods,'' digested with RNase A/T, resolved through a denaturing 5% polyacrylamide gel, and dried for autoradiography. The size of each protected fragment is 195 and 80 nt for SMC calponin and 18 S rRNA, respectively. Exposure time was for 24 h. B, 15 µg of total RNA from the indicated mouse cell lines and stomach were processed for RNase protection as described in A. A third riboprobe corresponding to the 3` 157 nt of SM alpha-actin was also used. Note the more widespread expression of SM alpha-actin as compared to SMC calponin. Exposure time was for 24 h. U, undifferentiated and D, differentiated cells as described in (10) . C, a rat SMC calponin riboprobe was hybridized to 15 µg of total RNA from the indicated rat cell lines and tissues and processed for RNase protection as described in A. Note that SMC calponin transcripts were present both in low passaged (P4) and high passaged (P55) RASMC and were not modulated if cells were made quiescent by serum deprivation for 3 days (Q) or serum stimulated (10%) for 24 h following quiescence. Exposure time was for 8 h. The PC12 cell line was induced to differentiate by treating subconfluent cells with 10 ng/ml nerve growth factor. D, protein extracts (50 µg) from the indicated cell lines were processed for Western blotting and incubated with a monoclonal antibody to human SMC calponin as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' Cells were either serum-deprived for 3 days (Q) or serum-deprived and then stimulated with 10% fetal bovine serum for 24 h. The growth state of each SMC line did not have any discernable effect on SMC calponin protein levels. The absence of any immunoreactive signal in 10T1/2 cells verifies the specificity of the antisera for only SMC calponin.



No SMC calponin transcripts were detected in the rat L6 skeletal myoblast line, PC12 cells, or the HepG2 liver cell line (Fig. 1C). On the other hand, a prominent signal was observed in the A7r5 fetal rat aortic SMC line as well as primary RASMC (Fig. 1C). These latter cells also expressed SMC calponin protein as determined by Western blotting (Fig. 1D). Importantly, SMC calponin mRNA was expressed at high levels in rat SMC irrespective of passage number or growth state (Fig. 1C). Together, these results show SMC calponin to be a highly restricted marker for SMC lineages. They also demonstrate the utility of both the A7r5 fetal rat aortic SMC line and multiply passaged primary RASMC for analyzing SMC calponin promoter activity (see below).

Expression of SMC Calponin mRNA in Adult and Developing Mouse Tissues

Several adult mouse tissues were analyzed by in situ hybridization as an additional measure of SMC calponin's specificity for SMC lineages. In adult heart and skeletal muscle, for example, SMC calponin mRNA was only observed in the blood vessels that permeate these tissues (Fig. 2, A and B). In small intestine and uterus, a strong hybridization signal was present in the smooth muscle tissue enveloping these organs (Fig. 2, C and D). Thus, SMC calponin mRNA is only expressed in vascular or visceral SMCs, and the RNase protection signal observed in tissues without a SMC component^2 is solely attributable to blood vessels.


Figure 2: Localization of SMC calponin transcripts in adult mouse tissues. Sections of adult mouse heart (A), skeletal muscle (B), small intestine (C), and uterus (D) were processed for in situ hybridization as described under ``Materials and Methods'' and photographed under darkfield microscopy. SMC calponin was detected in the SMC-containing tissues of small intestine (C) and uterus (D), but was only detected in blood vessels (arrows) of the heart (A) and skeletal muscle (B). Abbreviations are: en, endometrium; ve, villous epithelium.



To ascertain the spatiotemporal pattern of SMC calponin mRNA expression during embryogenesis, staged mouse embryos were processed for in situ hybridization. Surprisingly, SMC calponin mRNA first appeared at low levels in the heart at 8.5 days postcoitum.^2 As shown in Fig. 3B, 9.5-day postcoitum embryos displayed a strong hybridization signal throughout all chambers of the heart. This embryonic cardiac expression of SMC calponin persisted up to 13.5 days postcoitum at which time the mRNA could be detected in several SMC-containing tissues including lung, gut, and blood vessels (Fig. 3D). This expression pattern differs from that of SMMHC mRNA which, as shown previously (10) , is only expressed in SMC lineages during development (Fig. 3C). The expression of SMC calponin mRNA in the heart subsided by 15.5 days postcoitum.^2 At no time during development did we observe SMC calponin mRNA in skeletal muscle or its precursors. Sense probes showed no specific hybridization signal in the embryonic heart or elsewhere.^2 Together our findings show clearly that with the exception of early heart expression, SMC calponin is restricted to SMC lineages.


Figure 3: mRNA expression of SMC markers in staged mouse embryos. Adjacent saggital sections of 9.5 days postcoitum (A and B) or 13.5 days postcoitum (C and D) mouse embryos were hybridized to a mouse riboprobe corresponding either to SMMHC (A and C) or SMC calponin (B and D). Note the intense SMC calponin hybridization signal in the heart of both 9.5- and 13.5-day postcoitum embryos. Consistent with a previous report(10) , no SMMHC signal was ever observed in tissues without a SMC component. Abbreviations are: br, brain; fb, forebrain; gu, gut; he, heart; and li, liver.



Characterization of the Mouse SMC Calponin Gene

The mouse SMC calponin gene was isolated and characterized by sequence analysis and PCR. The gene contains 7 exons spanning 9451 nucleotides of DNA (Fig. 4; accession number U28932). The first exon of SMC calponin comprises both untranslated and translated sequences (Fig. 4), a feature uncommon among SMC genes which typically have an untranslated first exon(16, 17, 19, 20, 39) . The putative calmodulin- and actin-binding domains of SMC calponin (40) are split by introns. All intronic sequences at each splice site (except intron 3) conform to the ``gt/ag rule'' ((41) , Table 1).



Interestingly, the initial cloning of SMC calponin in chickens revealed two transcripts (designated alpha and beta) that apparently arose due to alternative splicing(23) . The putative splice site in the chicken SMC calponin cDNA maps precisely to the boundary of the sixth intron and seventh exon of the mouse SMC calponin gene. RT-PCR analysis of several mouse tissues with primers flanking this region, however, failed to reveal any splice variants of the mouse SMC calponin gene.^2 Thus, the splicing phenomenon of SMC calponin described by Takahashi and Nadal-Ginard (23) appears to be restricted to chickens.

SMC Calponin Transcription Initiates at Two Sites in the Absence of a Consensus TATAA Box or Initiator

Three independent assays were used to identify the transcription initiation site of SMC calponin: primer extension, RNase protection, and rapid amplification of the 5` cDNA end (5` RACE). Fig. 5A is a schematic of the SMC calponin gene showing the position of the probes and primers utilized for these analyses. Primer extension of uterus and stomach RNA revealed two bands of equivalent intensity indicating that the SMC calponin gene has two major sites of transcription initiation (Fig. 5B). These bands were not present in RNA from liver (Fig. 5B). The position of these bands places the 5` end of the SMC calponin mRNA 77 and 80 nt from the initiating methionine (Fig. 5E). Similarly, RNase protection using two probes (Fig. 5A) showed two major protected fragments in stomach and uterus (but not liver) that coincided with the primer extended products (Fig. 5C). Finally, two major 5` RACE products extended to the same site as that achieved by primer extension and RNase protection (Fig. 5D). These results establish the presence of two closely juxtaposed transcription initiation sites for the SMC calponin gene. The position of the two start sites, designated S(1) and S(2), is illustrated in Fig. 5E.

Most SMC structural or cytosolic genes contain a TATA box in their 5` promoter(16, 17, 19, 20, 39) . SMC calponin, however, has no consensus TATAA box (Fig. 5E). Moreover, no consensus initiator sequence (42) is present around its transcription start sites. There is, however, a sequence (TTCAAAAA) that may serve as a weak binding site for TATA binding protein (Fig. 5E and Fig. 6). Immediately 5` of S(1) is a stretch of 14 purines (underlined sequence in Fig. 6). Further upstream, a consensus CCAAT box is present as is a GC box (Fig. 6). Sequence analysis of the 5` 3000 nt of SMC calponin promoter revealed several consensus binding sites for regulatory factors involved with muscle transcription including E-boxes (43) and GATA binding sites (44) (Fig. 6; accession number U37071). No consensus MEF-2 binding sites (45) are present in the 5` 3000 nt of SMC calponin. Finally, several stretches of alternating purine-pyrimidine dinucleotides are present (double underlined sequences in Fig. 6).


Figure 6: Nucleotide sequence of mouse SMC calponin 5`-flanking region. Known muscle regulatory elements are boxed in black. The single underlined sequences are polypurine tracts and the double underlined sequences represent alternating purine/pyrimidine dinucleotide tracts. Note that the 3` most purine/pyrimidine repeat is contiguous with a polypurine tract. Triangles designate the 5` most boundary of each SMC calponin promoter construct (see Fig. 7A).




Figure 7: SMC calponin promoter activity in cultured RASMC. A, schematic of progressive 5` SMC calponin promoter deletions. Shown is a partial restriction map of the sites used to construct each deletion construct into the pGL3 basic luciferase vector. Note that the two BamHI sites were artificially engineered by PCR (see ``Materials and Methods''). The two transcription start sites are indicated by arrows. The black box corresponds to the 5` 60 nt of untranslated SMC calponin cDNA sequence, the 3` end of which is 19 nt upstream of the initiating methionine. The numbers represent the distance of the 5` end of each promoter construct from the S(1) start site. Abbreviations are: B, BamHI; H, HindIII; and N, NcoI. B, five independent transfections of RASMC (passage number 15-30) with each indicated SMC calponin promoter construct were performed as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' The relative light units of luciferase were normalized to total protein and then expressed as a percent of the pGL3 control vector (containing the SV40 promoter/enhancer). Note that the -115 CALPLuc construct was less than the promoterless pGL3 basic vector. Values represent the mean percent of pGL3 control ±S.E. of mean.



SMC Calponin Promoter Activity in Cell Lines

PCR and restriction digestion-mediated deletions of the SMC calponin promoter (Fig. 7A) were generated to study its activity in cultured cell lines. The results of five independent transfections in passaged RASMC are summarized in Fig. 7B. The 3000-nt promoter construct, -3000 CALPLuc, yielded high activity in cultured RASMC. Progressive deletions of this construct revealed that as little as 549 nt retained full promoter activity (Fig. 7B). The -115 CALPLuc promoter construct displayed no activity despite the presence of both transcription start sites and upstream GC and CCAAT boxes (see Fig. 6). In fact, -115 CALPLuc was expressed at a level 2 orders of magnitude less than the promoterless pGL3 basic reporter (Fig. 7B). The -1342 CALPLuc promoter construct, which displayed high activity in primary RASMC (Fig. 7B), exhibited no luciferase activity if the 3` 115 nt were removed.^2 This finding further supports our transcription initiation site mapping data (see Fig. 5).

To ascertain the specificity of SMC calponin promoter activity in vitro, several cell lines were transfected with either the promoterless pGL3 basic vector, the -3000 CALPLuc promoter, or the -549 CALPLuc promoter. Although these promoters showed higher relative activity in two SMC lines, several cell lines that do not express the endogenous SMC calponin transcript displayed some SMC calponin promoter activity (Fig. 8). Only the F9 teratocarcinoma cell line exhibited relatively low luciferase activity with both SMC calponin promoter constructs (Fig. 8). In general, the -549 CALPLuc promoter construct displayed higher activity than the -3000 CALPLuc construct, particularly in the 10T1/2 cell line (Fig. 8). This suggests the presence of negative regulatory elements between -3000 and -549. These results demonstrate functional SMC calponin promoter activity in vascular SMC and, to a lesser extent, several cell lines that do not express the SMC calponin transcript. This activity is largely imparted by sequences between -549 and -115 of the SMC calponin promoter.


Figure 8: SMC calponin promoter activity in different cell lines. Four independent transfections were carried out in the indicated cell lines with the promoterless pGL3 basic vector, -549 CALPLuc and -3000 CALPLuc as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' Activity was computed as described in the legend to Fig. 7B. Values represent the mean percent of pGL3 control ± S.E. of mean.




DISCUSSION

SMC Calponin: A Highly Restricted SMC Marker Expressed in Embryonic Heart

All three adult muscle types, skeletal, cardiac, and smooth, are distinguished by their different structural organization of contractile elements and functionally distinct modes of contraction. During embryogenesis, however, they express many of the same contractile protein genes. Both skeletal and cardiac muscle, for example, express SM alpha-actin, a gene that has been used extensively as a marker for SMC lineages(11, 46) . We recently documented the expression of a SMC marker of unknown function, SM22alpha, in embryonic heart and skeletal muscle of the mouse(14) . Here we show that SMC calponin first appears in the heart during mouse embryogenesis. Recently, Duband and co-workers (27) showed that SMC calponin and SM22alpha protein were expressed exclusively in SMC during chicken embryogenesis, but they did not measure the transcripts to these genes. Similarly, we did not assay the corresponding proteins in embryonic mice so it is possible that these markers are transcribed, but untranslated in embryonic mouse cardiac tissue.

The mRNA expression of SM alpha-actin, SM22alpha, and SMC calponin in the embryonic mouse heart should be contrasted with the notable absence of SMMHC transcripts in developing cardiac tissue ( Fig. 3and (10) ). These unique patterns of SMC gene expression during mammalian development suggest that distinct regulatory factors control each gene. Identifying these regulatory factors should provide insight into the mechanisms for SMC transcription and may contribute to an understanding of the complexity of SMC phenotypes that characterize many vascular lesions.

The functional significance of a shared genetic program between developing cardiac and smooth muscle has yet to be elucidated. One intriguing possibility is that cardiac muscle traverses a SMC-like phenotype during its ontogeny, a concept that is supported by the distinct differences in embryonic versus postnatal cardiac contractility(47) . In this regard, it will be of interest to determine whether the decompensated adult heart, which expresses a fetal cardiac phenotype(48) , expresses SMC calponin. Support for such expression is provided by studies in hypertrophied rat hearts, which express the SM alpha-actin gene(13) . If SMC proteins participate in some aspect of cardiac contractility, then they would do so in the absence of their native thick filament, SMMHC.

In addition to embryonic heart expression, SMC calponin mRNA was noted in proliferating BC(3)H1 cells. This cell line, originally thought to be of SMC origin(49) , is defective for terminal differentiation into sarcomeric muscle(50) . When stimulated to exit the cell cycle and differentiate, BC(3)H1 cells acquire a number of sarcomeric markers and, at the same time, lose several SMC markers(50) . The reversible expression of SMC calponin mRNA in BC(3)H1 cells is consistent with these findings and suggests that proliferating BC(3)H1 cells more closely resemble a SMC-like phenotype. Moreover, as with other SMC markers(50) , SMC calponin mRNA can be re-induced by serum-stimulating differentiated BC(3)H1, which leads to their re-entry into the cell cycle.^2 Thus, this cell line may be useful as a tool to uncover regulatory factors that activate SMC calponin gene expression in vitro.

With the exception of embryonic heart and proliferating BC(3)H1 cells, SMC calponin mRNA was only expressed in SMC lineages. No evidence of expression was noted in skeletal muscle or cell lines derived from skeletal muscle. Furthermore, no transcripts were detected in embryonic cell lines (ES, F9), fibroblasts (3T3 or 10T1/2), or endothelial (human umbilical vein) cells.^2 Thus, early reports of calponin protein expression in such tissues as the adrenal gland (51) and such cells as platelets, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells (28.29), probably reflected the presence of a recently cloned non-muscle (acidic) calponin(25) .

The SMC Calponin Promoter Displays Unusual Features not Commonly Found in Other SMC Gene Promoters

Neither a TATAA nor an initiator consensus element was found in the SMC calponin promoter. The absence of such elements is often associated with multiple transcription initiation sites(42) . Thus, it is not surprising that transcription initiation of the SMC calponin gene occurs at two closely juxtaposed guanine nucleotides. Similar characteristics are found in the human elastin gene(52) , but not SMMHC(19) , SM alpha-actin(16, 17) , SM -actin(39) , or SM22alpha(20) , all of which contain sequences closely related to the consensus TATAA box upstream of a single major initiation site. Although no obvious TATAA element is present in the SMC calponin promoter, there is the sequence TTCAAAAA 28 nt upstream of the 5` most start site that could conceivably serve as a weak binding element for TATA binding protein, since there is considerable heterogeneity in sequences that can bind TATA binding protein(53) .

The proximal promoter of SMC calponin shares many features with another TATAA/initiator-less promoter, thymidylate synthase(54) . Both genes have a stretch of purines immediately 5` of an initiation site. In addition, the SMC calponin promoter has an upstream polypurine tract that immediately follows a purine/pyrimidine dinucleotide repeat (see Fig. 6). These unique DNA sequences have been shown to play a role in transcription control. For example, polypurine tracts form DNA triple helices that serve as directional attenuators of transcription(55) . Purine/pyrimidine dinucleotide repeats promote the formation of Z DNA (56) , which has recently been shown to regulate the transcription of the c-myc proto-oncogene(57) . Such mechanisms of control could exclude transcription of SMC calponin in non-SMC-containing tissues.

Another shared feature between SMC calponin and thymidylate synthase is the presence of GC-rich sequences in their 5`-flanking region. Both genes, for example, have a GC box whose binding factors may interact with the basal transcriptional machinery to facilitate preinitiation complex formation and transcription(54) . Despite the presence of a GC box, as well as a CCAAT box and sequences around both initiation sites, the -115 CALPLuc promoter construct was totally inactive. This result indicates that upstream activators between -115 and -549 play a crucial role in the initiation of SMC calponin transcription. Sequence analysis of this region reveals two E-boxes and one GATA site.

Based on its highly restricted pattern of mRNA expression, we predicted that the SMC calponin promoter would be similarly restricted in activity. Although promoter activity was very high in SMC, we found it to be active in several cell lines, including L6, C2 myoblasts, and 10T1/2 fibroblasts, none of which express the endogenous gene. Only the F9 teratocarcinoma cell line showed low promoter activity. These findings suggest either a distal inhibition element involved in long range repression of SMC calponin expression in non-SMCs is missing from our promoter constructs or some other mode of transcriptional regulation confers SMC calponin's specificity for SMC lineages.


FOOTNOTES

*
This work was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health, The Robert A. Welch Foundation, and the Muscular Dystrophy Association (to E. N. O.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBank(TM)/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) U37071 [GenBank]and U28932[GenBank].

§
Supported by a National Research Service Award. Sequence analysis was supported through National Cancer Institute Grant CA-16672 to the Dept. of Biomathematics. To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed: Dept. of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI 53226. Tel: 414-456-5716; Fax: 414-266-8712; jmiano{at}post.its.mew.edu.

Current address: Hamon Center for Basic Cancer Research, The University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75235-9148. Tel.: 214-648-1187; Fax: 214-648-1196.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: SMC, smooth muscle cell(s); SM alpha-actin, smooth muscle alpha-actin; SMMHC, smooth muscle myosin heavy chain; RASMC, rat aortic smooth muscle cell(s); RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA end; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; nt, nucleotide(s); Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine.

(^2)
J. M. Miano and E. N. Olson, unpublished observations.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank M. Parmacek for communicating results prior to publication and A. Tizenor for assistance with graphics.


REFERENCES

  1. Schwartz, S. M., deBlois, D., and O'Brien, E. R. M. (1995) Circ. Res. 77, 445-465 [Free Full Text]
  2. Reilly, C. F., Kindy, M. S., Brown, K. E., Rosenberg, R. D., and Sonenshein, G. E. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 6990-6995 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Cserjesi, P., Lilly, B., Bryson, L., Wang, Y., Sassoon, D. A., and Olson, E. N. (1992) Development 115, 1087-1101 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Gorski, D. H., Patel, C. V., and Walsh, K. (1993) Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 3, 184-190
  5. Miano, J. M., Vlasic, N., Tota, R. R., and Stemerman, M. B. (1993) Am. J. Pathol. 142, 715-724 [Abstract]
  6. Martin, J. F., Miano, J. M., Hustad, C. M., Copeland, N. G., Jenkins, N. A., and Olson, E. N. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 1647-1656 [Abstract]
  7. Lawrence, R., Chang, L. J., Siebenlist, U., Bressler, P., and Sonenshein, G. E. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 28913-28918 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Morishita, R., Gibbons, G. H., Horiuchi, M., Ellison, K. E., Nakajima, M., Zhang, L., Kaneda, Y., Ogihara, T., and Dzau, V. J. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 5855-5859 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Olson, E. N., and Klein, W. H. (1994) Genes & Dev. 8, 1-8
  10. Miano, J. M., Cserjesi, P., Ligon, K. L., Periasamy, M., and Olson, E. N. (1994) Circ. Res. 75, 803-812 [Abstract]
  11. Ruzicka, D. L., and Schwartz, R. J. (1988) J. Cell Biol. 107, 2575-2586 [Abstract]
  12. Lecain, E., Alliot, F., Laine, M. C., Calas, B., and Pessac, B. (1991) J. Neurosci. Res. 28, 601-606 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Black, F. M., Packer, S. E., Parker, T. G., Michael, L. H., Roberts, R., Schwartz, R. J., and Schneider, M. D. (1991) J. Clin. Invest. 88, 1581-1588 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Li, L., Miano, J. M., Cserjesi, P., and Olson, E. N. (1995) Circ. Res. 78, 188-195 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Li, L., Miano, J. M., Mercer, B., and Olson, E. N. (1995) J. Cell Biol. in press
  16. Blank, R. S., McQuinn, T. C., Yin, K. C., Thompson, M. M., Takeyasu, K., Schwartz, R. J., and Owens, G. K. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 984-989 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Foster, D. N., Min, B., Foster, L. K., Stoflet, E. S., Sun, S., Getz, M. J., and Strauch, A. R. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 11995-12003 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Kahari, V. M., Fazio, M. J., Chen, Y. Q., Bashir, M. M., Rosenbloom, J., and Uitto, J. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 9485-9490 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Katoh, Y., Loukianov, E., Kopras, E., Zilberman, A., and Periasamy, M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 30538-30545 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Solway, J., Seltzer, J., Samaha, F. F., Kim, S., Alger, L. E., Niu, Q., Morrisey, E. E., Ip, H. S., and Parmacek, M. S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13460-13469 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Winder, S. J., and Walsh, M. P. (1993) Cell. Signal. 5, 677-686 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Takahashi, K., Takagi, M., Ohgami, K., Nakai, M., Kojima, A., Nadal-Ginard, B., and Shibata, N. (1993) Circulation 88, I-174
  23. Takahashi, K., and Nadal-Ginard, B. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 13284-13288 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Strasser, P., Gimona, M., Moessler, H., Herzog, M., and Small, J. V. (1993) FEBS Lett. 330, 13-18 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Applegate, D., Feng, W., Green, R. S., and Taubman, M. B. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 10683-10690 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Gimona, M., Herzog, M., Vandekerchkhove, J., and Small, J. V. (1990) FEBS Lett. 274, 159-162 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Duband, J. L., Gimona, M., Scatena, M., Sartore, S., and Small, J. V. (1993) Differentiation 55, 1-11 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Birukov, K. G., Stepanova, O. V., Nanaev, A. K., and Shirinsky, V. P. (1991) Cell Tissue Res. 266, 579-584 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Takeuchi, K., Takahashi, K., Abe, M., Nishida, W., Hiwada, K., Nabeya, T., and Maruyama, K. (1991) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 103, 311-316
  30. Chamley-Campbell, J., Campbell, G. R., and Ross, R. (1979) Physiol. Rev. 59, 1-61 [Free Full Text]
  31. Miano, J. M., Tota, R. R., Vlasic, N., and Stemerman, M. B. (1993) Arterioscler. Thromb. 13, 211-219 [Abstract]
  32. Nishida, W., Kitami, Y., and Hiwada, K. (1993) Gene (Amst.) 130, 297-302
  33. Chomczynski, P., and Sacchi, N. (1987) Anal. Biochem. 162, 156-159 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Min, B., Strauch, A. R., and Foster, D. N. (1988) Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 10374 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  36. Cooper, T. A., Cardone, M. H., and Ordahl, C. P. (1988) Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 8553-8565
  37. Gorman, C. M., Moffat, L. F., and Howard, B. H. (1982) Mol. Cell. Biol. 2, 1044-1051 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Blank, R. S., Swartz, E. A., Thompson, M. M., Olson, E. N., and Owens, G. K. (1995) Circ. Res. 76, 742-749 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Miwa, T., Manabe, Y., Kurokawa, K., Kamada, S., Kanda, N., Bruns, G., Ueyama, H., and Kakunaga, T. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 3296-3306 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Mezgueldi, M., Fattoum, A., Derancourt, J., and Kassab, R. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 15943-15951 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Breathnach, R., and Chambon, P. (1981) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 50, 349-383 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Azizkhan, J. C., Jensen, D. E., Pierce, A. J., and Wade, M. (1993) Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 3, 229-254 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Blackwell, T. K., and Weintraub, H. (1990) Science 250, 1104-1110 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Arceci, R. J., King, A. A. J., Simon, M. C., Orkin, S. H., and Wilson, D. B. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 2235-2246 [Abstract]
  45. Cserjesi, P., and Olson, E. N. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 4854-4862 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Woodcock-Mitchell, J., Mitchell, J. J., Low, R. B., Kieny, M., Sengel, P., Rubbia, L., Skalli, O., Jackson, B., and Gabbiani, G. (1988) Differentiation 39, 161-166 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Clark, E. B., Markwald, R. R., and Takao, A. (1995) Developmental Mechanisms of Heart Disease , Futura Publishing Co., Inc., Mt. Kisco, NY
  48. Nadal-Ginard, B., and Mahdavi, V. (1989) J. Clin. Invest. 84, 1693-1700 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Schubert, D., Harris, A. J., Devine, C. E., and Heinemann, S. (1974) J. Cell Biol. 61, 398-413 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Taubman, M. B., Smith, C. W. J., Izumo, S., Grant, J. W., Endo, T., Andreadis, A., and Nadal-Ginard, B. (1989) J. Cell Biol. 108, 1799-1806 [Abstract]
  51. Takahashi, K., Hiwada, K., and Kokubu, T. (1987) Life Sci. 41, 291-296 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  52. Bashir, M. M., Indik, Z., Yeh, H., Ornstein-Goldstein, N., Rosenbloom, J. C., Abrams, W., Fazio, M., Uitto, J., and Rosenbloom, J. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 8887-8891 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Wiley, S. R., Kraus, R. J., and Mertz, J. E. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 5814-5818 [Abstract]
  54. Geng, Y., and Johnson, L. F. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 4894-4903 [Abstract]
  55. Grabczyk, E., and Fishman, M. C. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 1791-1797 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Nordheim, A., and Rich, A. (1983) Nature 303, 674-679 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  57. Wittig, B., Wölfl, S., Dorbic, T., Vahrson, W., and Rich, A. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 4653-4663 [Abstract]

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.