©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Sls1p, an Endoplasmic Reticulum Component, Is Involved in the Protein Translocation Process in the Yeast Yarrowia lipolytica(*)

(Received for publication, July 26, 1995; and in revised form, February 6, 1996)

Anita Boisramé(§) Jean-Marie Beckerich Claude Gaillardin

From the Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire et Cellulaire, INRA, CNRS, Institut National Agronomique Paris-Grignon, 78850 Thiverval Grignon, France

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

Signal recognition particle-dependent targeting of secretory proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane is predominant in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. A conditional lethal mutant of the SCR2-encoded 7S RNA provided the first in vivo evidence for involvement of this particle in cotranslational translocation (He, F., Beckerich, J. M., and Gaillardin, C. M.(1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 1932-1937). In order to identify partners of 7S RNA or signal recognition particle in their function, we selected synthetic lethal mutations with the 7S RNA mutation (sls). The SLS1 gene, cloned by complementation of the sls1 mutant growth defect, encodes a 426-amino acid polypeptide containing a NH(2)-terminal signal peptide and a COOH-terminal endoplasmic reticulum (ER) retention motif. The SLS1 gene product behaves as a lumenal protein of the ER. Sls1p was sedimented with membrane-rich organelles and was resistant to protease degradation without prior membrane solubilization. Immunofluorescence microscopy showed a typical endoplasmic reticulum perinuclear staining. Co-immunoprecipitation revealed that Sls1p resides close to the major translocation apparatus component, Sec61p. Deletion of the SLS1 gene led to a temperature-sensitive growth phenotype. Synthesis of several secretory proteins was shown to be specifically reduced in Deltasls1 cells. We propose that Sls1p acts in the preprotein translocation process, interacting directly with translocating polypeptides to facilitate their transfer and/or help their folding in the ER.


INTRODUCTION

In order to enter the secretion pathway, secretory proteins of eukaryotic cells have to be transported across or inserted into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (^1)membrane. To achieve this translocation step, secretory proteins must be specifically targeted to the translocation machinery in the ER membrane and be competent for crossing this membrane(2) . In higher eukaryotes, the signal recognition particle (SRP) was shown to take part into these functions(3) . SRP is composed of a single 7S RNA and six polypeptides (4) . When the signal sequence of a nascent secretory polypeptide is extruded from the ribosome, it is first recognized by the nascent polypeptide associating complex(5) , which allows specific binding of SRP. Interaction of SRP with the nascent chain-ribosome complex causes translational slow down. After binding of SRP to its membrane-bound receptor, SRP is displaced from the complex and the nascent chain is transferred to the translocation site where crossing takes place simultaneously to translation. As soon as the polypeptide emerges in the lumen of the ER, it interacts with various proteins for processing and folding. A somewhat different picture emerged from studies on the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Indeed, several secretory proteins in this yeast appeared to be transported post-translationally, both in vivo and in vitro(6, 7) , and homologues of mammalian SRP components that have been identified in this yeast and function in translocation (8, 9, 10, 11) are not essential for cell viability. In another yeast Yarrowia lipolytica, deletion of both genes SCR1 and SCR2 encoding 7S RNA is lethal(12) , and we suggested earlier that the SRP-dependent targeting may be the main pathway, as in higher eukaryotic cells.

Isolation of conditional lethal mutants in the 7S RNA provided in vivo evidence for involvement of SRP in cotranslational translocation(1, 13) . In order to identify partners of SRP in this process and to better understand its molecular mechanisms, we have now selected synthetic lethal mutations with the 7S RNA mutation, called sls. In the present paper, we describe identification and characterization of one of these genes, SLS1, and of its gene product.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains, Growth Conditions, and Materials

For DNA manipulation, Escherichia coli strains TG1 or DH5alpha were used. E. coli cells were grown at 37 °C in LB medium (2.5% Luria broth base). Ampicillin was added at 100 µg/ml.

The Y. lipolytica haploid mutagenized strain was MatB, scr1::ADE1, Deltascr2, ura3, leu2, his-1, containing the replicative plasmid pINA1090 carrying the scr2-II.13 allele and the URA3 gene. Replacement of the scr2-II.13 allele by the wild-type allele was done by plasmid shuffling using the replicative plasmid pINA237, which contained the SCR2 gene and the LEU2 gene. For genetic studies, the sls1 Ts mutant was mated with a MatA, scr1::ADE1, Deltascr2, lys11, ura3, leu2 strain containing the plasmid pINA398 carrying the SCR2 gene and the URA3 gene. Diploids were sporulated and analyzed as described previously(12) . To isolate the SLS1 gene from a LEU2-based replicative genomic library constructed by P. Fournier, a Leu- Ts segregant from this cross was retained. Transformation of Y. lipolytica by the lithium acetate method was performed as described previously(14) . Y. lipolytica strains were usually grown at 28 °C in YPD (1% yeast extract, 1% bacto-peptone, 1% glucose). For transformant selection, minimal medium (0.17% yeast nitrogen base without ammonium sulfate and without amino acids, 1% glucose, 0.1% proline) was used, and supplements were added to a final concentration of 0.01%. 5-Fluoroorotic medium contained 0.001% of uracil and 0.125% of 5-fluoroorotic acid. AEP induction was performed using GPP medium (2% glycerol, 0.17% yeast nitrogen base without ammonium sulfate and without amino acids, 0.3% proteose peptone, 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 6.8, and appropriate supplements for the growth of cells). For labeling, GC medium (same as GPP but 0.2% casein instead of 0.3% proteose peptone) was used.

Plasmids and Nucleic Acid Manipulations

E. coli plasmid pBS (Bluescript, from Stratagene) was used for DNA sequencing of a 2-kb ClaI-SalI fragment carrying the SLS1 gene. pINA237 and pINA398 containing the SCR2 allele have been described previously(1) . To test sls1-1 monocopy complementation, a 3.4-kb XbaI-HindIII fragment was cloned between the unique sites NheI and HindIII of an integrative plasmid. Integration was directed at the LEU2 locus of the sls1 Ts mutant after linearization with ApaI, which cuts in the LEU2 gene. The SLS1 inactivated copy was constructed in two steps: a 963-bp deletion of the SLS1 coding region was first created by ligation of a 550-bp EcoRI-SspI fragment with a 5.8-kb PvuII-EcoRI fragment, and a 1.65-kb SalI-SalI fragment containing the URA3 gene was then cloned in the XhoI site 55-bp upstream the HindIII site. The 2.45-kb ClaI-HindIII fragment was directly used to transform a MatB, scr1::ADE1, ura3, leu2, his-1 strain (INAG 136463). A truncated copy of the SLS1 gene was obtained after insertion of a polymerase chain reaction-amplified 1150-bp internal fragment in an integrative vector. Linearization of the recombinant plasmid by XmnI, which cuts within the SLS1 coding region directed integration at the SLS1 locus of INAG 136463, creating a tandem repeat of 3`- and 5`-truncated copies of SLS1.

Anti-Sls1p Antibodies

To raise antibodies against the SLS1 gene product, a large fragment of the SLS1 coding region was fused in frame with the glutathione S-transferase-encoding gene from Schistosoma japonicum using the vector pGEX-2T(15) . Nucleotides 61-1210 of SLS1 were amplified by polymerase chain reaction using two primers. The first, flanked by a BamHI site, was 5`-CGCGGATCCGATGAAATCTGCAGAGTT-3`; the second one, in opposite orientation and flanked by an EcoRI site, was 5`-CCGGAATTCTAAGCTTGACGAGATCAT-3`. The polymerase chain reaction product was inserted as a BamHI-EcoRI fragment in pGEX-2T. The recombinant 70-kDa protein was expressed at high levels in E. coli cells after a 4-h induction with 0.1 mM isopropyl-1-thio-beta-D-galactopyranoside. After centrifugation, cells were resuspended in ice cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), 1% Triton X-100 and then lysed by sonication. Supernatant was passed over a glutathione-Sepharose column. After washes in PBS, the fusion protein was eluted with 5 mM glutathione in 50 mM Tris, pH 8. The hybrid protein was used to immunize subcutaneously rabbits after denaturation with 0.5% SDS at 80 °C and dilution in PBS. For the first injection, the protein was mixed with Freund's complete adjuvant. Two booster injections were done at intervals of 4 weeks using incomplete adjuvant. For each injection, 50 µg of the fusion protein was injected. Sera were collected after the last boost and tested by immunoblotting. They recognized a single product and were thus used at 1:1000 dilution.

Immunofluorescence

Cells grown in rich YPD medium to optical density of 1-2 were fixed by the addition of 5% formaldehyde to the culture. After centrifugation, cells were incubated for 2 h at room temperature without shaking in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, 0.5 mM MgCl(2), 5% formaldehyde. Cells were then resuspended in 10 ml of 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.5, containing 25 mM beta-mercaptoethanol and permeabilized using 10 mg of Zymolyase 20T and 20 mg of Cytohelicase during 40 min at 37 °C. 10 µl of the cell suspension in PBS were put in wells of immunofluorescence slides pretreated with polylysine. Cells were treated with 10 µl of PBS plus 0.5% bovine serum albumin and 0.05% Nonidet P-40 during 15 min and washed before the addition of 10 µl of 1:300 diluted anti-Sls1p antibodies. After 1 h of incubation and washes in PBS, bound primary antibodies were decorated with 1:300 diluted fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG. Slides were treated with 300 µg/ml 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole and mounted in one drop of mounting medium (1:10 PBS, 9:10 glycerol, 1 mg/ml p-phenylenediamine).

Membrane Fractionation and Cross-linking

25 ml of Y. lipolytica cultures grown overnight to early-log phase (optical density, 1-2) were centrifugated, and cells were resuspended in 500 µl of spheroplast buffer (1.5 M sorbitol, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 2 mM MgCl(2), 60 mM beta-mercaptoethanol) after washing. 130 units of zymolyase 20T were added per optical density unit of cells, and incubation was performed for 30 min at 30 °C. 500 µl of 1.8 M sorbitol were added, and protoplasts were pelleted after cooling and centrifugation. After resuspension in 200 µl of lysis buffer (0.2 M sorbitol, 0.1 M NaCl, 25 mM NaPi, pH 7.4, 1 mM MgCl(2), 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride), glass beads were added, and cells were lysed by 4 times 15-s vortexing. Clarified extracts were harvested after a 2-min centrifugation at 450 times g. Total protein content was measured by the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad S.A., Ivry-Sur-Seine). For membrane fractionation, extracts were further fractionated by a 20-min centrifugation at 10,000 times g. The supernatant and pellet were collected. For the protease protection experiment, the latter pellet was resuspended in 120 µl of lysis buffer and divided into three parts. Each was incubated for 1 h on ice; two were treated with 0.5 mg/ml of proteinase K in the absence of any detergent or in the presence of 4% Triton X-100, and the last was left untreated. Reactions were stopped by the addition of 20% trichloroacetic acid. For cross-linking, 0.2 mg/ml dithiobis(succinimidyl propionate) were added to 200 µl of clarified extracts simultaneously to 1% Triton X-100. After a 20-min incubation at room temperature, the reaction was stopped by the addition of 0.2 M NH(4)Ac and incubation on ice for 10 min. Samples were then incubated 10 min at 65 °C with 1% SDS before dilution with 0.8 ml of PBS and immunoprecipitation. Immunoprecipitation was performed at 4 °C during 3 h in the presence of antibodies and 10 µl of protein A-Sepharose. Extracts and PBS-washed immunoprecipitates were diluted with 2 times SDS-PAGE buffer containing 50 mM dithiothreitol and heated 10 min at 95 °C before loading on SDS-polyacrylamide gels. After migration, proteins were electrotransferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher & Schuell). Preincubation with 2% milk, antibody incubations, and washes were done in 10 mM Tris, pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20 buffer.

Pulse-Chase Labeling and Immunoprecipitation of AEP

Cells grown overnight in GPP medium at 18 °C were concentrated to 1,000 klett in GC medium and equilibrated at 18 °C for 20 min before a 1-h shift to a nonpermissive temperature of 28 °C. Cells were radiolabeled with 750 µCi of L-[4,5-^3H]leucine for 45 s and then chased with a 300-fold excess of cold L-leucine. 3-ml aliquots were withdrawn at 0, 1, 2.5, and 5 min and mixed with 2.3 g of crushed ice plus 10 mM NaN(3) and 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride to stop protein synthesis. After centrifugation, supernatants were precipitated with 10% trichloroacetic acid on ice for 1 h. Precipitates were dissolved in 200 µl of SDS-PAGE loading buffer and neutralized with 1 M Tris, pH 9.5. Cell extracts, prepared as described previously(16) , were adjusted to 1% SDS and 4% Triton X-100 before immunoprecipitation. Total incorporation of label was measured at two post-chase time points by scintillation counting of boiled trichloroacetic acid precipitates from two 100-µl samples of labeled cell suspension. Proteins were analyzed by electrophoresis in 10% polyacrylamide gels, after which they were dried and fluorographed.

Glycoprotein Precipitation with Concanavalin A-Sepharose

Cells were grown in minimal medium at 20 °C. 25 optical density units of cells were resuspended in 0.8 ml of sulfate-free synthetic medium and incubated for 30 min before labeling with 500 µCi of TranS-label for 10 min at 26 °C. Cells were chased with 200 µl of 50 mM cold methionine and cysteine and 10 µl of 1 M NaN(3). 100 µl of the 200 µl of clarified extract was diluted with 400 µl of concanavalin A buffer (15 mM NaPi, pH 7, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS), and 40 µl of packed concanavalin A-Sepharose beads was added, followed by incubation at room temperature for 2 h. After four washes, bound proteins were dissociated in SDS-PAGE buffer by heating at 95 °C for 5 min. Glycosylated proteins were analyzed by electrophoresis in 6% polyacrylamide gels. Gels were then dried and fluorographed.


RESULTS

Isolation of a Mutant That Displays Synthetic Lethality with the scr2-II.13 Mutant

To identify partners of the 7S RNA and/or the SRP in the cotranslational translocation process, we looked for new mutations aggravating the phenotype of the conditional scr2-II.13 mutation. Previous studies have indicated that such synthetic lethal interactions occur between genes encoding proteins involved in a common complex process(17, 18) . The scr2 mutant strain that contains chromosomal deletions of both SCR1 and SCR2 and carries the scr2-II.13 allele on a replicative plasmid is viable at 32 °C, having a generation time doubled at this temperature(1) . Clones unable to grow at 32 °C were selected after UV mutagenesis of the scr2 mutant strain. To distinguish between mutants with a tight temperature-sensitive lethal growth phenotype and synthetic lethal ones, the scr2-II.13 allele was replaced by the wild-type allele by plasmid shuffling (selection for Leu+ Ura- transformants), and the growth phenotype produced by the second mutation alone was studied. The sls1-1 mutation (for synthetic lethal with the 7S RNA mutation) was shown to confer an extreme Ts growth phenotype only in association with the scr2-II.13 mutation (Fig. 1, 1 versus 2). However, the sls1 single mutant still displayed a temperature-sensitive growth, having its generation time doubled at 28 °C in a SCR2 context as compared with a wild-type strain (Fig. 1, 2 versus 3).


Figure 1: Colonies formed on rich medium after incubation at 28 °C by the double mutant sls1-1, src2-II.13 (1), the sls1-1 mutant (2), and the wild-type strain (3).



Isolation of the SLS1 Gene

The sls1-1 mutation was shown to be recessive and monogenic by genetic analysis (not shown). The sls1 mutant was thus transformed with a LEU2-based replicative Y. lipolytica genomic library. 25,000 Leu+ transformants were selected at 28 °C on leucine-free medium and were tested for growth at 32 °C by replica plating on rich medium. Four independent clones were able to grow at this temperature. Temperature-resistance depended on the presence of the recombinant plasmids because Leu- segregants recovered the initial Ts growth phenotype. The four plasmids isolated from these colonies contained the same 5-kb genomic insert as shown by restriction enzyme analysis. To localize the sls1-1 complementing gene in this insert, several overlapping fragments were subcloned and recombinant plasmids were tested for complementation of the sls1 temperature sensitivity. A 1.9-kb fragment was sufficient to confer temperature resistance to the sls1 mutant (Fig. 2). Integration of the 3.4-kb XbaI-HindIII fragment at the chromosomal LEU2 locus restored a wild-type growth at 32 °C. This insert was therefore able to complement the sls1-1 mutation as a single copy.


Figure 2: Map of the chromosomal insert cloned in the plasmid complementing the sls1 mutant temperature sensitivity (1) and subfragments tested for complementation of the sls1-1 growth defect in multicopy (2-5) or monocopy (6). C, ClaI; E, EcoRI; H, HindIII; N, NheI; P, PvuII; S, SalI; Ss, SspI; Xb, XbaI.



Primary Structure of the SLS1 Gene Product

The 1967-base pair insert was sequenced and shown to contain a single complete open reading frame of 1278 bp (Fig. 3A), potentially encoding a 426-amino acid polypeptide. A putative TATA box was found 135 bp upstream of the start codon, and a putative transcription termination element was present 14-58 bp downstream of the TAA translation stop codon (Fig. 3B). The deduced amino acid sequence shared no significant homology with proteins present in the data base. However, the amino-terminal sequence of the SLS1 protein showed the features of a 17-amino acid signal peptide, containing a stretch of 8 hydrophobic residues(19) . Such an amino-terminal extension characterizes secreted proteins. A tetrapeptide motif RDEL was observed at the carboxyl terminus of the predicted sequence. A related sequence, KDEL, has been shown to be implicated in soluble protein retention in the endoplasmic reticulum (20) . Because no other hydrophobic region is present, Sls1p is likely to be an ER lumenal protein. No potential N-linked glycosylation site was found.


Figure 3: A, detailed restriction map of the sequenced minimal complementing region. The SLS1 open reading frame is represented by a large dark arrow. The upstream and downstream regions are visualized by a thin box. The ClaI-HindIII fragment containing a internal deletion and the URA3 gene was used to inactivate the chromosomic copy of SLS1. B, nucleotide sequence of the SLS1 gene. Coordinate +1 corresponds to the translation initiation codon. The potential TATA box is circled, and the potential polyadenylation site is underlined. The predicted amino acid sequence is shown in single-letter code. The putative signal peptide and ER retention motif are boxed.



Localization of the SLS1 Gene Product

To verify the predictions concerning the intracellular localization of Sls1p, antibodies were raised against a large region of the Sls1 protein extending from residue 21 to residue 403, fused to the S. japonicum glutathione S-transferase protein. The serum reacted with a unique protein of approximately 55 kDa in whole extracts of wild-type cells (Fig. 4A, lane 1). This signal was amplified in cells carrying the SLS1 gene on a centromeric plasmid (Fig. 4A, lane 2). In cells expressing a carboxyl-terminal deletion of Sls1p lacking the last 23 amino acid residues, the signal appeared at a lower molecular weight (Fig. 4A, lane 4). The amount of the truncated protein was reduced compared with the wild-type protein level. In a cell fractionation and protease sensitivity experiment, Sls1p was shown to reside within a membranous cellular compartment. Sls1p was sedimented after a low speed centrifugation (10,000 times g) and remained resistant to protease degradation in the absence of detergent (Fig. 4B). However, after membranes solubilization by Triton X-100, Sls1p became accessible to proteinase K. Immunofluorescence microscopy was performed with anti-Sls1p antibodies to determine the localization of the SLS1 gene product. Wild-type cells showed a specific Sls1p perinuclear staining (Fig. 4C). Because the ER is an extension of the nuclear envelope, this staining pattern is consistent with a localization of the protein into the ER. A similar pattern was obtained in S. cerevisiae for the soluble ER resident protein Kar2p (21) or for the ER membrane protein Sss1p(22) . In cells expressing the 3`-truncated copy of the SLS1 gene, Sls1p immunoreactivity was more diffuse (not shown).


Figure 4: Localization of the Sls1 protein. A, characterization of the anti-Sls1p antibodies produced against a glutathione S-transferase-Sls1p fusion protein. Western blot analysis of whole cell extracts from various Y. lipolytica transformants containing different SLS1 mutant constructs. The strain in lane 1 contains the wild-type SLS1 allele on the chromosome, the strain in lane 2 also contains the SLS1 gene on a 3-4-copy plasmid, the strain in lane 3 contains the deleted Deltasls1 allele on the chromosome, and the strain in lane 4 contains a 3`-truncated chromosomal copy of SLS1. Equal amounts of total protein were applied on SDS-PAGE. B, cell fractionation and protease protection of Sls1p. A whole cell extract from the wild-type strain 136463 was made by a gentle method and cleared from unbroken cells and cell wall fragments by centrifugation at 450 times g. Supernatant (S) was recollected and subfractionated by a 20-min centrifugation at 10,000 times g leading to two fractions (S and C). Samples of the resuspended latter fraction were treated on ice for 1 h with 0.5 mg/ml of proteinase K in the absence or in the presence of 4% Triton X-100. Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by Western blotting with Sls1p antiserum. C, localization of Sls1p by immunofluorescence in cells expressing the chromosomic SLS1 gene. Cells were grown overnight in rich medium, prepared for immunofluorescence, and treated with rabbit anti-Sls1p antibodies, followed by fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG to localize the Sls1 protein (a) and 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole to visualize nuclear DNA (b and d). The Sls1p signal was abolished by exclusion of the primary antibodies or by staining of the Deltasls1 strain (c).



Levels of Sls1p Expression

ER lumenal proteins such as the chaperone BiP or the protein disulfide isomerase are involved in folding of translocated polypeptides and are induced under conditions leading to protein misfolding. In the yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe or in S. cerevisiae, increased levels of the BiP/Kar2 protein result from an induction of its transcripts(21, 23) . To test such a regulation for the SLS1 gene, intracellular levels of Sls1p were first examined by immunoblotting under conditions of heat shock and inhibition of glycosylation. A 2-fold increase of Sls1p intracellular amounts was observed 1 h after incubation at 34 °C compared with levels in cells incubated at 28 °C (Fig. 5A, lanes 2, 4, and 6 versus lanes 1, 3, and 5) and was maintained for at least 30 min. Half of an overnight wild-type cell culture, freshly diluted, was treated with tunicamycin for 3 h at 23 °C. Levels of Sls1p detected by Western blot in cell extracts from this culture were 2-3-fold higher than amounts revealed in cells of the untreated second culture (Fig. 5B, lane 2 versus lane 1). Similar results were obtained when SLS1 induction was monitored using a SLS1::lacZ transcription fusion (not shown).


Figure 5: Levels of intracellular Sls1p after heat shock and tunicamycin treatment. A, half of an overnight culture in rich medium was incubated at 34 °C (lanes 2, 4, and 6), whereas the second half remained at 28 °C (lanes 1, 3, and 5). Samples were taken every 15 min for 90 min. B, half of an overnight culture in rich medium was incubated for 3 h at 23 °C in the presence of tunicamycin (10 µg/ml) (lane 2), whereas the second half was left untreated (lane 1). Whole cell extracts were made and subjected to SDS-PAGE (8% polyacrylamide gel). Proteins were transferred to mitrocellulose and probed with rabbit anti-Sls1p antibodies and goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with peroxidase. In these experiments, equal amounts of total protein were loaded for each extract.



Sls1p Is Required for Growth at Elevated Temperatures

Because a short Sls1 protein (of approximately 20 kDa) is still present in the sls1-1 mutant, a sls1 null mutant was constructed to determine if the protein was required for cell viability. A 2.45-kb ClaI-HindIII fragment carrying a deletion of the first 289 amino acids and the URA3 gene (Fig. 3A) was used to transform a haploid strain carrying a SLS1 wild-type copy on a LEU2-based replicative plasmid. Ura+ transformants were selected. To eliminate clones that would have integrated the deleted fragment in the resident LEU2-plasmid, stable Ura+ clones were retained after culture in rich medium and replica plating on 5-fluoroorotic acid medium in the presence of leucine. Loss of the LEU2, SLS1 plasmid was then selected after incubation at 25 °C. One of the Ura+ Leu- segregants showed a temperature-sensitive growth phenotype. Integration of the deleted copy in place of the wild-type one was confirmed by Southern blot analysis. Immunoblot of extracts from Deltasls1 cells with anti-Sls1p antibodies revealed no signal (Fig. 4A, lane 3). The function of the Sls1p is therefore not required for cell viability but is essential for optimal growth at elevated temperatures.

Secretory Protein Synthesis Is Inhibited in Deltasls1 Cells

Because the scr2-II.13 mutation caused a specific inhibition of the synthesis of a cotranslationally translocated secretory protein (1) and because the sls1-1 mutation conferred a synthetic growth defect with the 7S RNA mutation, we looked for similar defects in the sls1 null mutant. Deltasls1 cells were compared with SLS1 cells for synthesis, maturation, and secretion rates of the AEP by a pulse-chase labeling and immunoprecipitation experiment after a 1 h shift to 28 °C. AEP is synthesized as a 53-kDa preproprotein with a signal sequence and a pro-domain upstream from the mature domain. In wild-type cells, the earliest precursor immunoprecipitated (pAEP, 55 kDa) lacks the signal sequence and is core-glycosylated, as expected for a cotranslationally translocated protein(16, 24) . Subsequent cleavage by a Xpr2-like Golgi endoprotease results in a 20-kDa propeptide and a 32-kDa mature form, both of which are secreted.

Deltasls1 and SLS1 cells were labeled in inducing medium for 45 s and chased. Fig. 6A shows a 7-fold reduction of the amount of labeled intracellular forms in Deltasls1 cells compared with SLS1 cells (lanes 1-4 versus lanes 5-8). The level of the secreted 32-kDa mature form in the growth medium of Deltasls1 cells, detected after trichloroacetic acid precipitation, was also lower than these revealed in supernatant of SLS1 cells (Fig. 6B, lanes 1-4 versus lanes 5-8). Total protein synthesis was similar in the two strains. Because AEP precursors in Deltasls1 cells could bind to concanavalin A-Sepharose (not shown), they corresponded to translocated forms. Maximal level of both precursor and mature forms was only obtained at 2.30 min in Deltasls1 cells (Fig. 6A, lane 3) compared with 1 min in SLS1 cells (Fig. 6A, lane 6). Therefore, detection of total newly synthesized AEP precursors was delayed in the absence of the SLS1 gene product. This observation suggests that translocation is affected in a Deltasls1 context. In addition, a delay in AEP processing was observed. In contrast to SLS1 cells, where the mature form was predominant at 1 min in cell extracts (Fig. 6A, lane 6) and secreted at 2.30 min in the medium (Fig. 6B, lane 7), most of AEP mature form was immunoprecipitated at 2.30 min in Deltasls1 cell extracts (Fig. 6A, lane 3) and appeared at 5 min in supernatant (Fig. 6B, lane 4). This delay in maturation reflects an increased transit time upstream from the Golgi.


Figure 6: Pulse-chase labeling and immunoprecipitation analysis of AEP synthesis and secretion in SLS1 and Deltasls1 strains. Y. lipolytica SLS1 cells (lanes 5-8) and Deltasls1 cells (lanes 1-4) were grown overnight at 18 °C in inducible medium, concentrated in fresh medium, and transferred for 1 h at 28 °C before a 45-s labeling pulse with L-[4,5-^3H]leucine. Cells were chased by the addition of a 300-fold excess of cold leucine, and samples were taken 0, 1, 2.30, and 5 min after the chase. A, intracellular extracts were immunoprecipitated with polyclonal anti-AEP antibodies and protein A-Sepharose. B, supernatant proteins were trichloroacetic acid-precipitated. Precipitates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and visualized after fluorography at -80 °C. Positions of the AEP 55-kDa precursor and the 32-kDa mature form are indicated by arrows.



The effect of the deletion of the SLS1 gene on other secretory proteins was tested by looking at the amount of glycosylated [S]methionine-labeled proteins bound to concanavalin A-Sepharose in Deltasls1 cells compared with SLS1 cells. The level of several major glycoproteins appeared to be largely reduced in the absence of the SLS1 gene product (Fig. 7, lane 2 compared with lane 1), suggesting that synthesis of these preproteins was impaired. In contrast, the amount of at least one glycoprotein was increased in Deltasls1 cells.


Figure 7: Pattern of glycosylated proteins in SLS1 cells (lane 1) and in Deltasls1 cells (lane 2) at 26 °C. [S]Methionine-labeled total proteins from each strain were incubated with concanavalin A-Sepharose beads. Bound proteins were eluted by heating, applied to a 6% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, and visualized after fluorography.



Secretion of AEP Is Delayed in SLS1 Overexpressing Cells

AEP synthesis and secretion were studied in the presence of a 3-fold higher level of the Sls1 protein, as estimated by immunoblotting (Fig. 4A), in order to detect any modification of the secretion process. Pulse-chase labeling experiments were performed under the same conditions as for the sls1 null mutant. The ratio of AEP incorporation, measured after immunoprecipitation, to total protein labeling was similar in both extracts of overexpressing cells and wild-type cells, suggesting that the Sls1 protein is not limiting in the cotranslational translocation process. However, in these cells, intracellular maturation of the 55-kDa precursor form by the endoprotease and subsequent secretion of the 32-kDa mature form in the growth medium were delayed compared with SLS1 cells (Fig. 8, lanes 5-8 versus lanes 1-4).


Figure 8: AEP secretion in Sls1p overexpressing cells. SLS1 monocopy cells (lanes 1-4) and SLS1 multicopy cells (lanes 5-8) were pulse-labeled for 45 s and chased as previously described. Samples were taken at 0, 1, 2.30, and 5 min post chase and centrifuged. Proteins from each supernatant were trichloroacetic acid-precipitated and subjected to SDS-PAGE and fluorography. Mature AEP is signaled by an arrow.



Sls1p Is Localized Close to the Major Component of the Translocation Pore

In order to test the proximity of the Sls1 protein to the translocation apparatus as expected for a protein involved in translocation, co-precipitation of Sls1p with the major component of the translocation channel Sec61p (25) was performed. A Sec61p homologue has been recently identified in Y. lipolytica. (^2)The Yl Sec61p amino acid sequence shares 22 amino acid residues out of 28, between residues 5 and 32, with the Sc Sec61p NH(2)-terminal region recognized by the antibodies. A membrane-rich fraction was made from wild-type cells and subjected or not to cross-linking by the cleavable reagent dithiobis(succinimidyl propionate) simultaneously to solubilization with 1% Triton X-100. Extracts were then immunoprecipitated with an excess of anti-Sc Sec61 antibodies. Immunoprecipitates, resolved on SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose, were blotted with anti-Sls1p antibodies. The Sls1 protein was co-precipitated with the Sec61p homolog of Y. lipolytica as shown in Fig. 9A. Because a signal corresponding to Sls1p (lane 1) was obtained either with or without prior cross-linking (lanes 2 and 3), the Sls1 protein appeared to be tightly associated with the Sec61 protein. The reverse experiment was done with antibodies raised against a NH(2)-terminal peptide of Y. lipolytica Sec61p. These antibodies revealed a same product either in crude extracts (Fig. 9B, lane 1) or in Yl Sec61p (lane 2), Sc Sec61p (lane 3), or Sls1p immunoprecipitates (lane 4). No signal appears in Y. lipolytica Sec61p immunoprecipitates when blotting was done with preimmune serum (lane 5).


Figure 9: Sls1p and Sec61p co-precipitation. A, a membrane-rich fraction was prepared from wild-type cells. Samples were subjected or not to cross-linking by the cleavable reagent dithiobis(succinimidyl propionate) (0.2 mg/ml) simultaneously to solubilization in 1% Triton X-100 and were immunoprecipitated by anti-S. cerevisiae Sec61p antibodies. Precipitates were resolved on SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and blotted with anti-Sls1p antibodies. Lane 1, crude extracts; lane 2, Sec61p immunoprecipitates after cross-linking; lane 3, Sec61p immunoprecipitates without dithiobis(succinimidyl propionate) treatment. B, Sec61p blotting with antibodies raised against a 21-amino acid NH(2)-terminal peptide^2 on crude extracts (lane 1), on extracts solubilized with 1% Triton X-100 and immunoprecipitated either by anti-Y. lipolytica Sec61p antibodies (lane 2), by anti-S. cerevisiae Sec61p antibodies (lane 3), or by anti-Sls1p antibodies (lane 4). In lane 5, immunoprecipitates analyzed in lane 2 were probed with anti-Y. lipolytica Sec61p preimmune serum.




DISCUSSION

Genetic data indicate that major secretory proteins are targeted and translocated across the ER membrane in a SRP-dependent way in the yeast Y. lipolytica(12) . This yeast therefore represents a good model for a genetic approach of cotranslational translocation molecular mechanisms. A SRP-deficient strain carrying the mutant scr2-II.13 allele on a replicative plasmid (1) was used to look for secondary mutations that specifically exacerbate the Ts growth phenotype displayed by this first mutation. Such genetic interactions leading to synthetic enhancement have been observed a posteriori for SEC17 and SEC18, whose products are both involved in transport vesicles fusion(17) , or between two specific alleles of the SEC63 and KAR2 genes(26) . In our case, secondary mutations could affect products that either act at the same targeting step or function in a different but coordinated step. Several mutations were obtained that conferred high sensitivity to elevated temperature only in combination with the 7S RNA mutation (sls); one called sls1-1 was studied in more detail.

The SLS1 gene encoded a 426-amino acid residue polypeptide with a functional signal sequence at its NH(2) terminus and a functional ER retention signal at its COOH terminus as evidenced by immunofluorescence microscopy. Like lumenal ER proteins in other yeasts, the Y. lipolytica Sls1p hydrophilic protein is probably localized into the ER through a retention mechanism involving a specific receptor(27) . This receptor should recognize the RDEL motif and allow retrieval of the protein from a late compartment. Indeed, removal of this ER retention signal results in decreased amounts of intracellular Sls1p. The truncated protein probably continues on the secretory pathway transiting through the Golgi and secretion vesicles. However, no significant levels of Sls1p were detected in the growth medium, probably due to instability of the protein outside in the medium or degradation along the secretory pathway. The strain expressing this truncated Sls1 protein did not show any growth defect, suggesting that the secreted form of Sls1p performed its function during its transit through the ER.

The sls1 null mutation conferred a temperature-sensitive growth phenotype similar to that of the sls1-1 mutant, indicating that the 20-kDa SLS1 product detected in the latter cells was not functional. The temperature sensitivity of Deltasls1 cells may reflect an improving role for Sls1p in an essential cellular process, such as preprotein translocation, that could become limiting at 30 °C in the absence of Sls1p. Alternatively, Sls1p may perform an essential function only at elevated temperatures in a heat shock pathway. In a Deltasls1 context, synthesis of several preproteins was severely reduced as in the scr2 mutant. The main conclusion from this observation is that the Sls1 protein is likely to be involved in the cotranslational translocation process, accounting for the genetic interaction between the two mutations. The translation defect of the scr2-II.13 mutant could be explained by a decrease in initiation of preprotein translocation. To explain the translation defect in the absence of Sls1p, we favor the hypothesis that Sls1p helps translocating polypeptides on the lumenal side of the ER membrane, completing their translocation. Consistent with this scheme, a delay is observed for the appearance of total newly synthesized precursors in the absence of the SLS1 gene product. The function of mammalian ER lumenal proteins in cotranslational translocation, mediating the net transfer of the polypeptide into the ER lumen, has already been proposed(28) . Sls1p might thus increase the translocation initiation rate on the opposite side of the ER membrane by freeing the translocon from the ER side. Co-precipitation of Sls1p with the major component of the translocation apparatus, which reveals that Sls1p resides in the vicinity of the translocation site, fits well with a function of the protein in preprotein translocation. Interestingly, Sls1p displays a domain similar to the COOH-terminal moiety of the family of Sec61beta polypeptides (Fig. 10). Sec61beta was described as a companion of Sec61p (Sec61alpha) in the translocon(29) . We propose that this domain is involved in Sec61p binding for Sls1p. This hypothesis will be tested in the near future.


Figure 10: Sequence alignment of a Sls1p domain with a region of Sec61beta proteins from various organisms and human cDNA sequences. Identical amino acids are shaded in dark gray and similar residues in light gray.



Our results are compatible with a second function of Sls1p in protein folding after translocation has been completed, its defect accounting for the delay observed in the processing of the 55-kDa precursor form in Deltasls1 cells. Additional evidence for a role of Sls1p during precursor transit through the ER was provided by the delay of precursor processing into the mature form in cells overexpressing Sls1p. Prevention of secretion of some secretory proteins has been described in mammalian cells overexpressing the BiP protein (30) and was supposed to result from the stabilization of the complex between newly translocated preprotein and BiP. Induction of Sls1p levels under conditions leading to ER accumulation of misfolded preproteins was also consistent with such a property.

Our results show that synthetic lethality may be used as a screen for isolation of new mutations and that such genetic interaction could be observed for two products that are physically separated but involved in the same coordinated pathway.


FOOTNOTES

*
This work was supported by European Community contract BIO2-CT93-0470 and by INRA and CNRS. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
Recipient of a fellowship from the Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire et Cellulaire, INA, INRA Centre de Grignon, 78850 Thiverval Grignon, France. Tel.: 33-1-30-81-54-43; Fax: 33-1-30-81-54-57.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: ER, endoplasmic reticulum; SRP, signal recognition particle; AEP, alkaline extracellular protease; kb, kilobase(s); bp, base pair(s); PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; Ts, temperature-sensitive.

(^2)
D. Swennen, manuscript in preparation.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank E. Hartmann for the gift of anti-Sc Sec61p antibodies.


REFERENCES

  1. He, F., Beckerich, J. M., and Gaillardin, C. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 1932-1937 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Randall, L. L., and Hardy, S. J. S. (1986) Cell 46, 921-928 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Walter, P., and Blobel, G. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 77, 7112-7116 [Abstract]
  4. Walter, P., and Blobel, G. (1983) Cell 34, 525-533 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Wiedmann, B., Sakai, H., Davis, T. A., and Wiedmann, M. (1994) Nature 370, 434-440 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Rothblatt, J. A., and Meyer, D. I. (1986) EMBO J. 5, 1031-1036
  7. Deshaies, R. J., Koch, B. D., Werner-Washburne, M., Craig, E. A., and Schekman, R. (1988) Nature 332, 800-805 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Felici, F., Cesareni, G., and Hughes, J. M. X. (1989) Mol. Cell. Biol. 9, 3260-3268 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Hann, B. C., Poritz, M. A., and Walter, P. (1989) J. Cell Biol. 109, 3223-3230 [Abstract]
  10. Stirling, C. J., and Hewitt, E. W. (1992) Nature 356, 534-537 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Brown, J. D., Hann, B. C., Medzihradszky, K. F., Niwa, M., Burlingame, A. L., and Walter, P. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 4390-4400 [Abstract]
  12. He, F., Yaver, D., Beckerich, J. M., Ogrydziak, D., and Gaillardin, C. M. (1990) Curr. Genet. 17, 289-292 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Yaver, D., Matoba, S., and Ogrydziak, D. M. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 116, 605-616 [Abstract]
  14. Xuan, J. W., Fournier, P., and Gaillardin, C. (1988) Curr. Genet. 14, 15-21
  15. Smith, D. B., and Johnson, K. S. (1988) Gene (Amst.) 67, 31-40
  16. Matoba, S., Fukayama, J., Wing, R. A., and Ogrydziak, D. M. (1988) Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 4904-4906 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Kaiser, C. A., and Schekman, R. (1990) Cell 61, 723-733 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Rothblatt, J. A., Deshaies, R. J., Sanders, S. L., Daum, G., and Schekman, R. (1989) J. Cell Biol. 109, 2641-2652 [Abstract]
  19. von Heijne, G. (1985) J. Mol. Biol. 184, 99-105 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Munro, S., and Pelham, H. R. B. (1987) Cell 48, 899-907 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Rose, M. D., Misra, L. M., and Vogel, J. P. (1989) Cell 57, 1211-1221 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Esnault, Y., Blondel, M. O., Deshaies, R. J., Schekman, R., and Kepes, F. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 4083-4093 [Abstract]
  23. Pidoux, A. L., and Armstrong, J. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 1583-1591 [Abstract]
  24. Fabre, E., Tharaud, C., and Gaillardin, C. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 15049-15055 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Görlich, D., Prehn, S., Hartmann, E., Kalies, K.-U., and Rapoport, T. A. (1992) Cell 71, 489-503 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Scidmore, M., Okamura, H. H., and Rose, M. D. (1993) Mol. Biol. Cell 4, 1145-1159 [Abstract]
  27. Lewis, M. J., Sweet, D. J., and Pelham, H. R. B. (1990) Cell 61, 1359-1363 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Nicchitta, C. V., and Blobel, G. (1993) Cell 73, 989-998 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Hartmann, E., Sommer, T., Prehn, S., Görlich, D. Jentsch, S., and Rapoport, T. A. (1994) Nature 367, 654-657 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Dorner, A. J., Wasley, L. C., and Kaufman, R. J. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 1563-1571 [Abstract]

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.