(Received for publication, February 6, 1996; and in revised form, March 15, 1996)
From the
Melanoma-associated genes (MAGEs) encode tumor-specific antigens
that can be recognized by CD8 cytotoxic T lymphocytes.
To investigate the interaction of the HLA-A1-restricted MAGE-1 peptide
161-169 (EADPTGHSY) with HLA class I molecules, photoreactive
derivatives were prepared by single amino acid substitution with N
-[iodo-4-azidosalicyloyl]-L-2,3-diaminopropionic
acid. These derivatives were tested for their ability to bind to, and
to photoaffinity-label, HLA-A1 on C1R.A1 cells. Only the derivatives
containing the photoreactive amino acid in position 1 or 7 fulfilled
both criteria. Testing the former derivative on 14 lymphoid cell lines
expressing over 44 different HLA class I molecules indicated that it
efficiently photoaffinity-labeled not only HLA-A1, but possibly also
HLA-A29 and HLA-B44. MAGE peptide binding by HLA-A29 and HLA-B44 was
confirmed by photoaffinity labeling with photoreactive MAGE-3 peptide
derivatives on C1R.A29 and C1R.B44 cells, respectively. The different
photoaffinity labeling systems were used to assess the ability of the
homologous peptides derived from MAGE-1, -2, -3, -4a, -4b, -6, and -12
to bind to HLA-A1, HLA-A29, and HLA-B44. All but the MAGE-2 and MAGE-12
nonapeptides efficiently inhibited photoaffinity labeling of HLA-A1,
which is in agreement with the known HLA-A1 peptide-binding motif
(acidic residue in P3 and C-terminal tyrosine). In contrast,
photoaffinity labeling of HLA-A29 was efficiently inhibited by these as
well as by the MAGE-3 and MAGE-6 nonapeptides. Finally, the HLA-B44
photoaffinity labeling, unlike the HLA-A1 and HLA-A29 labeling, was
inhibited more efficiently by the corresponding MAGE decapeptides,
which is consistent with the reported HLA-B44 peptide-binding motif
(glutamic acid in P2, and C-terminal tyrosine or phenylalanine). The
overlapping binding of homologous MAGE peptides by HLA-A1, A29, and B44
is based on different binding principles and may have implications for
immunotherapy of MAGE-positive tumors.
MAGE ()is a family of at least 12 related genes that
are expressed in tumors of various histological types but not in normal
adult tissue, except for testis(1) . The identification of
MAGEs and CTL epitopes they encode relied on the use of melanoma cell
lines and autologous MAGE-specific CTL
clones(1, 2, 3, 4) . The first MAGE
CTL epitopes that have been mapped are the HLA-A1-restricted MAGE-1
peptide 161-169 (EADPTGHSY) and the homologous MAGE-3 peptide
168-176 (EVDPIGHLY)(4, 5, 6) . Other
MAGEs encode related sequences, which, except for MAGE-2 and MAGE-12,
also contain the known HLA-A1 peptide-binding motif, e.g. an
acidic residue in position 3 and a C-terminal
tyrosine(4, 7, 8, 9) .
Since the availability of MAGE-specific CTL clones is limited and the identification of epitopes they recognize is cumbersome, it is likely that there exist several as yet unidentified MAGE CTL epitopes or conversely that known MAGE CTL epitopes could be presented by other HLA molecules. The latter possibility is suggested by recent reports showing that some groups of HLA class I molecules overlap in peptide binding specificity(10, 11, 12) .
In the
present study we utilized HLA class I photoaffinity labeling to
investigate whether HLA-A1 binding MAGE peptides can also bind to other
HLA molecules. We have previously shown that the interaction of
antigenic peptides with MHC class I molecules can be assessed on cells
by photoaffinity labeling(13, 14, 15) . In
the systems studied so far, MHC class I photoaffinity labeling was
remarkably allele-specific. Moreover, the lack of significant labeling
of other cellular components made possible the analysis of
photoaffinity labeling by direct SDS-PAGE of lysates of labeled
cells(13, 14, 15) . The main limitation of
this approach was the synthesis and identification of suitable
photoreactive and radiolabeled peptide derivatives. To overcome this
difficulty we have recently introduced a novel synthesis strategy that
permits the preparation of such peptide derivatives by automated solid
phase peptide synthesis in which single amino acids are replaced with
photoreactive N-[iodo-4-azidosalicyloyl]-L-2,3-diaminopropionic
acid (Dap(IASA))(15) .
Here we show that suitable HLA binding photoreactive derivatives of MAGE-1 and -3 peptides can be identified by systematic testing of single Dap(IASA)-substituted peptides. Photoaffinity labeling experiments revealed that the MAGE-3 peptides 168-176 and 167-176, as well as homologous MAGE peptides, can bind not only to HLA-A1 but also to HLA-A29 and HLA-B44. This photoaffinity labeling approach, combined with molecular modeling, constitutes a straightforward means to identify overlapping peptide binding by HLA class I molecules.
Figure 1: HLA-A1 binding of photoreactive derivatives of the MAGE-1 peptide. Photoreactive derivatives of the MAGE-1 peptide 161-169 (EADPTGHSY) were prepared by replacing each amino acid with Dap(IASA), except for the HLA-A1 contact residues Asp-163 and Tyr-169. The ability of these derivatives to bind to HLA-A1 was assessed in a recognition-based competition assay, and the HLA-A1 competitor activities are expressed relative to the MAGE-1 161-169 peptide (A). Alternatively, the radioiodinated peptide derivatives were incubated with HLA-A1-transfected C1R cells (C1R.A1), and following UV irradiation the lysates of the washed cells were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (10%, reducing conditions) (B).
The remaining derivatives were tested for
their ability to photoaffinity label HLA-A1 molecules on
HLA-A1-transfected C1R cells (C1R.A1) (Fig. 1B).
Following incubation of these cells with the radioiodinated peptide
derivatives and UV irradiation, cell lysates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE.
The derivatives containing Dap(IASA) in P1 or P7 efficiently labeled a
material that migrated with an apparent M of
approximately 45 kDa (lanes 1 and 5, respectively).
The derivatives containing Dap(IASA) in P4 or P5 weakly labeled this
component, whereas the remaining two derivatives failed to do so (lanes 2-4 and 6). This labeled material could
be immunoprecipitated with the W6/32 mAb (data not shown). Since this
mAb immunoprecipitates all HLA class I molecules (22) and
HLA-A1 is the only HLA molecule significantly expressed by this C1R
transfectant(18) , this 45-kDa material is the HLA-A1 heavy
chain. Indeed, untransfected C1R cells displayed no detectable HLA
labeling (data not shown).
It is worth noting that the different MAGE-1 peptide derivatives also weakly labeled materials with apparent molecular mass of approximately 70, 96, and 150 kDa, respectively. It is conceivable that at least some of these are heat shock proteins, which have been reported to bind peptides(23) . Since the different photoprobes labeled these species with different intensities relative to HLA-A1, it is likely that the underlying binding principles are different.
Figure 2:
Photoaffinity labeling of different cell
lines with Dap(IASA)-ADPTGHSY. Fifteen different cell lines were
subjected to photoaffinity labeling with
Dap(IASA)-ADPTGHSY and analyzed as described for Fig. 1B (A). The HLA class I molecule
expression of the cell lines is summarized in panel B. The
first nine were HLA homozygous EBV-transformed cell lines that have
been described at the 10th International Histocompatibility Workshop (16) (workshop numbers are indicated as ws#), and
their HLA-C expression has been determined by polymerase chain
reaction(18) . The heterozygous EBV-transformed cell lines were
derived from HLA-typed individuals. In the case of HLA-C this
serological typing was incomplete, as indicated by question
marks. The remaining cell line was COS-7 cells transfected with
HLA-Cw
1601.
While the HLA photoaffinity labeling on BM21 cells, which express HLA-A1, was expected, the labeling observed on MOU cells, which express HLA-A*2902, HLA-B*4403, and HLA-Cw*1601 (Fig. 2B), was unexpected. As suggested by the similarly efficient HLA labeling observed on 807-02 cells, which express HLA-A29 but not HLA-B44 or HLA-Cw*1601, this peptide derivative apparently also photoaffinity-labeled HLA-A29. HLA-Cw*1601 labeling could be ruled out, since COS-7 cells transfected with HLA-A1, but not with HLA-Cw*1601, displayed HLA labeling (lane 14 and data not shown). This is consistent with the finding that an HLA-Cw*1601-restricted MAGE-1 peptide (SAYGEPRKL) displayed no similarity with the HLA-A1-binding MAGE peptides ( (24) and Fig. 3).
Figure 3: Partial amino acid sequences of the MAGE-1-, MAGE-2-, MAGE-3-, MAGE-4a-, MAGE-4b-, MAGE-6-, and MAGE-12-encoded antigens. The homologous sequences that bind to HLA-A1 and HLA-29 are shown in black boxes and gray cassettes, respectively, and the corresponding decapeptides that bind to HLA-B44 are shown in black cassettes. The differences in the amino acid numbers among the different MAGE sequences originate from amino acid inserts or deletions in the first quarter of the sequences(1) .
The weak labeling observed on LG2 cells (lane 11) suggested that Dap(IASA)-ADPTGHSY also photoaffinity-labeled HLA-B44. However, the possibility could not be ruled out that the labeled HLA molecule was another HLA-C allele that could not be typed by serology (Fig. 2A).
Figure 4: Binding of MAGE-encoded peptides to HLA-A1, HLA-A29, and HLA-B*4403. C1R.A1 cells were incubated with radioiodinated MAGE-1 peptide derivative Dap(IASA)-ADPTGHSY in the absence or presence of a 100-fold molar excess of the indicated MAGE peptides (A). Alternatively, analogous experiments were performed by using C1R.A29 cells and the MAGE-3 nonapeptide derivative EVDPI-Dap(IASA)-HLY (B) or C1R.B*4403 cells and the MAGE-3 decapeptide derivative MEVDPIG-Dap(IASA)-LY (C). After UV irradiation the cells were detergent-lysed, the immunoprecipitated HLA molecules were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, and the resulting autoradiograms were evaluated by densitometry. All experiments were performed at least in triplicate. 100% of labeling refers to the labeling observed in the absence of a competitor peptide.
When tested on C1R.B*4403 cells, none of these derivatives efficiently labeled HLA-B*4403. Because the peptide-binding motif of HLA-B44 is glutamic acid in P2 and a C-terminal tyrosine or phenylalanine(25, 26) we repeated these experiments with Dap(IASA) derivatives of the MAGE-3 decapeptide 167-176 (MEVDPIGHLY). Significant HLA-B*4403 labeling was observed with the derivatives containing Dap(IASA) in P5 or P6 or best in P8. All labelings were inhibitable by the parental peptide (Fig. 4C and data not shown).
A considerably different pattern of inhibition was observed in the HLA-A29 system. As shown in Fig. 4B the MAGE-2, -3, -6, and -12 nonapeptides, at a 100-fold molar excess, inhibited the HLA-A29 photoaffinity labeling by the MAGE-3 nonapeptide derivative EVDPI-Dap(IASA)-HLY on C1R.A29 cells by 80-98%. Conversely, the MAGE-1, -4a, and -4b nonapeptides inhibited HLA-A29 photoaffinity labeling only weakly (34-60%), and the tyrosinase peptide again displayed no significant inhibition. As for HLA-A1, although less pronounced, the MAGE-1 decapeptide bound less efficiently to HLA-A29 than the MAGE-1 nonapeptide. Similar differences were observed for other MAGE peptides (data not shown).
Finally, the HLA-B44 photoaffinity labeling on C1R.B*4403 cells by the MAGE-3 decapeptide derivative MEVDPIG-Dap(IASA)-LY was used to assess the binding of the corresponding MAGE decapeptides to HLA-B*4403. As shown in Fig. 4C the HLA-B*4403 labeling was inhibited in the presence of a 100-fold molar excess of the MAGE-2, -3, -6, and -12 peptides by 80-90%. The relatively inefficient inhibition of the HLA-B44 photoaffinity labeling by the parental MAGE-3 decapeptide (86%) indicated that Dap(IASA) substitution in P8 artificially increased its binding to HLA-B44. The MAGE-1, -4a, and -4b peptides were less efficient competitors, causing only 52-63% inhibition. As shown for the MAGE-1 peptide in Fig. 4C, the MAGE decapeptides were considerably more efficient competitors than the corresponding MAGE nonapeptides (63 versus 22% inhibition). This is in accordance with the peptide-binding motif for HLA-B44, which is glutamic acid in position 2 and tyrosine or phenylalanine at the C terminus(25, 26) . Similar results were obtained when C1R.B*4402 cells were used instead of C1R.B*4403 cells (data not shown), indicating that the two main subtypes of HLA-B44 bind these MAGE peptides with similar efficiency. This is consistent with the observation that these subtypes bind a very similar array of endogenous peptides(25) .
Figure 5: Binding of MAGE-3 peptide variants to HLA-A1, HLA-A29, and HLA-B*4403. The ability of the indicated MAGE-3 nonapeptide (A and B) or decapeptide (C) variants to bind to HLA-A1 (A), HLA-A29 (B), or HLA-B*4403 (C) was examined as described for Fig. 4, except that a 20-fold molar excess of the peptide variants (competitors) were used in the experiments shown in A and B.
Similar findings were obtained for the MAGE-3 nonapeptide binding by HLA-A29. As shown in Fig. 5B, the HLA-A29 photoaffinity labeling on C1R.A29 cells by EVDPI-Dap(IASA)-HLY was inhibited in the presence of a 20-fold molar excess of the parental peptide by about 81%. Replacement of the terminal peptide tyrosine with phenylalanine and especially alanine or leucine significantly reduced the MAGE-3 peptide's ability to bind to HLA-A29, indicating that efficient peptide binding by HLA-A29, similar to that by HLA-A1, preferred a C-terminal tyrosine. Because peptide binding by HLA-A29 has thus far not been described, we assessed the inhibitory ability of all other single alanine-substituted MAGE-3 peptide variants. Significant reduction of the peptide binding (e.g. of the inhibition of the HLA-A29 photoaffinity labeling) was observed upon alanine substitution of Val-169, Ile-172, and Leu-175 (Fig. 5B and data not shown). To further study the role of Val-169 in peptide binding, MAGE-3 peptide variants containing phenylalanine or isoleucine in P2 were examined. Both variants were significantly better (3-4-fold) competitors than the parental MAGE-3 peptide. It thus appears that efficient peptide binding by HLA-A29 requires a C-terminal tyrosine and a hydrophobic residue in P2 and is further stabilized by hydrophobic residues in P5 and P8. These findings are in accordance with the observed differential binding of the MAGE peptides under study. For example, the peptides MAGE-2, -3, and -6, which bind well to HLA-A29, all have an aliphatic residue in P2, P5, and P8, whereas the MAGE-1 peptide, which binds poorly to this allele, has alanine in P2 and polar residues in P5 and P8 ( Fig. 3and Fig. 4B).
As shown in Fig. 5C, the HLA-B44 photoaffinity labeling on C1R.B*4403 cells by MEVDPIG-Dap(IASA)-LY was inhibited in the presence of a 100-fold molar excess of the MAGE-3 decapeptide MEVDPIGHLY by about 85%. Alanine substitution of Glu-168 and Tyr-176 both substantially reduced the binding of the MAGE-3 decapeptide to HLA-B44 (about 37 and 16% inhibition, respectively). In contrast, replacement of the C-terminal tyrosine with phenylalanine increased the MAGE-3 peptide's binding to HLA-B44 nearly 2-fold, and replacement with leucine only slightly reduced the peptide binding. These findings are consistent with the reported HLA-B44 peptide-binding motif (glutamic acid in P2 and a C-terminal tyrosine or phenylalanine) and indicate that HLA-B44, unlike HLA-1 and HLA-A29, can avidly bind also peptides with C-terminal residues other than tyrosine.
Figure 6: Computer modeling of HLA-A1, HLA-A29, and HLA-B*4403-MAGE-3 peptide complexes. A, side view of the HLA-A1-MAGE-3 peptide 168-176 complex showing the peptide and the HLA-A1 residues Arg-114 and Asp-116. B, B pocket of the HLA-A29-MAGE-3 peptide 168-176 complex with peptide Val-170; the polymorphic B pocket residues are labeled. C, B pocket of the HLA-B*4403-MAGE-3 peptide 167-176 complex with peptide Glu-169. Two rotamers of this side chain are shown, one in green and one in purple; polymorphic B pocket residues are labeled. D, of the same complex the peptide Tyr-176 is shown in the F pocket, of which the polymorphic F pocket residues Arg-97 and Asp-116 are indicated. Hydrogen bond and salt bridge formation are indicated as red dotted lines in A, C, and D.
According to our modeling the MAGE-3 peptide 168-176 binding by HLA-A29 involves a similar binding of the peptide tyrosine by the F pocket (data not shown). This is consistent with the observation that HLA-A29 and HLA-A1 peptides both preferentially bind peptides containing a C-terminal peptide tyrosine (Fig. 5, A and B) and that both alleles have the same F pocket residues, except for the conservative substitution of residue 97 (Table 1). According to our data, peptide binding by HLA-A29 is favored by a hydrophobic peptide residue in P2 (Fig. 5B). According to our model, the B pocket of HLA-A29 is formed in essence by the allele-specific HLA-A29 residues Ala-24, Met-45, Val-67, and Tyr-99 and is remarkably large and hydrophobic and thus seems to be adequate to effectively accommodate voluminous hydrophobic side chains (Fig. 6B).
In contrast, the B pocket of HLA-B*4403, according to our modeling, is very different (Fig. 6C). This pocket is more narrow and harbors the mostly polar HLA-B44 allele-specific residues Tyr-9, Thr-24, Lys-45, Ser-67, and Tyr-99 (Table 1). Our data and data by others indicate that HLA-B44-binding peptides have a glutamic acid in P2 (Fig. 5C and (25) and (26) ). Our model suggests that the binding of this side chain by the HLA-B44 B pocket involves primarily the formation of a salt bridge with HLA-B44 Lys-45 and hydrogen bond formation with HLA-B44 Ser-67. Alternatively, in a different rotamer the carboxyl group of this glutamic acid can form hydrogen bonds with the phenol functions of HLA-B44 Tyr-9 and Tyr-99 (shown in green). In this case hydrogen bonding between HLA-B44 Lys-45 and Glu-63 is expected to increase (data not shown). It is conceivable that in the bound state the peptide's glutamic acid flips back and forth between these two rotamers. This binding principle is different from one proposed by other investigators, according to which the glutamyl carboxyl group interacts simultaneously with HLA-B44 Lys-45, Ser-67, and Tyr-9(26) . According to both models optimal hydrogen bond formation can only be realized if the peptide residue in P2 is glutamic acid and not aspartic acid.
While the MAGE-3 peptide binding by all three HLA alleles under study involves the binding of the C-terminal peptide tyrosine side chain by the HLA F pocket, our modeling suggests that this interaction is different for HLA-B44 versus HLA-A1 and HLA-A29. As shown in Table 1, the allele-specific F pocket residue 97 is Arg in HLA-B44 but Ile or Met in HLA-A1 and HLA-A29, respectively. According to our modeling this residue is in the vicinity of Asp-116, and both form hydrogen bonds with the phenol group of the C-terminal tyrosine (Fig. 6D). Additional modeling studies suggest that upon replacement of this tyrosine with phenylalanine a salt bridge is formed between Arg-97 and Asp-116, resulting in a reduction of the polarity at the bottom of the HLA-B44 F pocket (data not shown). In HLA-A1 and HLA-A29 such a neutralization is not possible (Fig. 6A and data not shown). This is consistent with the observation that peptide binding by HLA-A1 and HLA-A29 strongly prefers a C-terminal tyrosine, whereas HLA-B44 also efficiently binds peptides with C-terminal phenylalanine or even leucine (Fig. 5C and Refs. 25 and 26).
A main finding of the present study is that homologous MAGE peptides, most of which were previously known to bind to HLA-A1, can also bind to HLA-A29 and to HLA-B44 ( Fig. 3and Fig. 4). Overlapping peptide binding by different HLA class I alleles has been observed previously, allowing grouping of HLA alleles into supertypes. So far two HLA supertypes have been reported, which bear similarity to HLA-A2 and HLA-B7, respectively(10, 11, 12) . The cross-reactivity observed among the HLA molecules of these supertypes was essentially based on variations of a given HLA-peptide binding principle. In contrast, the overlapping peptide binding reported in this study clearly involves different binding principles.
Its only common feature was the binding of the C-terminal tyrosine of the MAGE peptides by the HLA F pocket. However, even this relatedness was limited in that the F pockets of HLA-A1 and HLA-A29 bind preferentially tyrosine, while the F pocket of HLA-B44 binds also phenylalanine or leucine (Fig. 5). However, the second main HLA-peptide contact was entirely different in the three systems. While for HLA-A29 and HLA-B44 this contact involved the binding of the peptide P2 residue side chain by the B pocket, as has been observed for many other HLA molecules, HLA-A1 instead binds the peptide P3 residue side chain by its D pocket ( Fig. 4and Fig. 5).
Peptide binding by HLA-A1 has been described previously in great detail (7, 8, 9) and our findings are consistent with these reports. All MAGE peptides under study that express the HLA-A1 peptide-binding motif (acidic residue in P3 and a C-terminal tyrosine) efficiently bound to HLA-A1, indicating that the contribution to the binding of the residues that are polymorphic in these sequences is not important ( Fig. 3and 4A). According to our model Arg-114 plays a key role in the peptide binding by HLA-A1 in that it is critically involved in the binding of the acidic peptide residue in P3 by the D pocket as well as the peptide tyrosine by the F pocket (Fig. 6A).
A different and
more complex situation was observed for the MAGE-3 peptide binding by
HLA-A29. Our competition experiments with MAGE-3 nonapeptide variants
and modeling studies strongly suggest that this interaction involves
the binding of the C-terminal tyrosine side chain by the F pocket and
the peptide P2 residue side chain by a nonpolar B pocket. Regarding the
latter interaction it is interesting to note that endogenous peptides
eluted from the closely related HLA-A31, which has the same B pocket
residues as HLA-A29 (Table 1), predominantly contained Leu, Val,
Phe, or Tyr in P2(27) . However, unlike HLA-A1, HLA-A29 bound
the different MAGE peptides with considerably different efficiencies (Fig. 4B), suggesting that in this system secondary
anchor interactions are more important. Together with HLA-A29 binding
studies using MAGE-3 peptide variants (Fig. 5B) these
data indicate that hydrophobic residues in P5 and P8 can strengthen
peptide binding by HLA-A29. According to our modeling, these
interactions are explained by hydrophobic interactions with equally
nonpolar domains on the HLA-A29 surface, namely the D pocket and
adjacent region on the 2 helix, as well as a region on the
1
helix flanking the F pocket. (
)
While further insights in
HLA-A29 peptide binding have to await sequencing of endogenous
peptides, we would like to add that in Caucasians the two main subtypes
of HLA-A29 are HLA-A*2901 and HLA-A*2902, which differ only by one
amino acid in position 19 (His in HLA-A*2901 and Asp in HLA-A*2902).
Since this position is located in the last turn of the -pleated
sheet, thus remote from the HLA peptide-binding
domain(21, 28) , this substitution is unlikely to
affect the peptide binding.
As seen from sequencing of endogenous
peptides or binding studies with alanine-substituted peptides (Fig. 5D and (25) and (26) ) a
hallmark of peptide binding by HLA-B44 is the requirement for a
glutamic acid in P2. This also explains why the MAGE decapeptides bound
to HLA-B44 more efficiently than the corresponding nonapeptides (shown
for the MAGE-1 peptides in Fig. 4C) in that the MAGE
nonapeptides lack one amino acid to undergo the stabilizing canonical
interactions of the N terminus with the HLA
molecule(21, 28) . According to our model (Fig. 6C) and one published by DiBrino et al.(26) the HLA-B44 B pocket is ideally structured to avidly
bind a glutamic acid side chain. Our modeling further proposes that in
the F pocket of HLA-B44 Arg-97 and Asp-116 can either hydrogen bond
with the phenol group of a C-terminal peptide tyrosine or, in the
absence of this group, can form together a salt bridge (Fig. 6C). The resulting reduction of the
polarity of the HLA-B44 F pocket provides an explanation for the
observation that HLA-B44 also binds peptides with C-terminal Phe or
even Leu (Fig. 5C, (25) and (26) ). It
is interesting to note that several HLA-B alleles, such as HLA-B37,
HLA-B40, HLA-B60, and HLA-B61, bind peptides containing Glu in P2 and a
hydrophobic residue in PC (Table 2). It is therefore conceivable
that there may exist overlapping peptide binding among these HLA-B
alleles (e.g. an HLA-B44 supertype).
While all the MAGE
decapeptides under study have Glu in P2 and a C-terminal tyrosine (Fig. 3) and bind to HLA-B*4403, some variations in binding
efficiency were observed (Fig. 4C). These differences
are most likely explained by secondary anchor residues. For example
sequencing of peptides eluted from HLA-B44 showed a preference for an
aliphatic hydrophobic residue in P3 and often also in
P6(25, 26) ; this is consistent with the observation
that the MAGE-1 and the two MAGE-4 decapeptides, which lack hydrophobic
residues in these positions, bound less avidly to HLA-B44 ( Fig. 3and Fig. 4C). According to our modeling,
residues in P3 and P6 undergo hydrophobic interactions with nonpolar
domains on HLA-B44. It is noteworthy that the two major
subtypes of HLA-B44 are HLA-B*4402 (nearly in Caucasian populations)
and HLA-B*4403 (about ). HLA-B*4403 differs from HLA*B4402 in having
leucine, rather than aspartic acid, in position 156. Both subtypes are
similar in their peptide binding(25) . However, according to
computer modeling, the conformation of HLA-B*4402 and HLA-B*4403 bound
peptides can be significantly different,
which may explain
why HLA-B44-restricted CTLs generally recognize one or the other, but
not both subtypes and why HLA-B44-alloreactive T cells readily arise in
donor/acceptor systems that differ in HLA-B44 subtypes (29) . (
)
Since the present study is the first to use
photoaffinity labeling to analyze peptide binding by HLA class I
molecules, the advantages and limitations of this approach are briefly
discussed. As this technique utilizes purified radioiodinated
photoprobes and I has a high specific radioactivity
(around 2000 Ci/mMol), the ligand concentration in these experiments is
low (nanomolar range). Therefore, this technique is mainly suitable for
the study of avid HLA-peptide interactions (dissociation constants in
the nanomolar range), which includes most, but not all, HLA class
I-peptide interactions; otherwise, nonspecific labeling, based on
random collision, will obscure the specific photoaffinity labeling. In
the present study such problems were encountered only in the case of
HLA-B44. These problems can be circumvented by using purified HLA
molecules. This, however, voids the main advantage of this technique,
which is photoaffinity on living cells. While these experiments are
simple to perform, they require suitable radioactive photoreactive
derivatives. While the synthesis of such compounds is usually
easy(15) , it is a priori not known in what position
Dap(IASA) is best introduced in a given peptide, and thus several
Dap(IASA) derivatives need first to be evaluated for efficiency and
specificity of HLA photoaffinity labeling. One risk is that the
photoreactive group in certain positions can significantly interact
with the HLA molecule and increase the binding of the peptide
derivative. In this situation the parental peptide is unable to
efficiently inhibit the HLA photoaffinity labeling, as was observed in
this study for the HLA-B44 photoaffinity labeling (Fig. 4C).
It is interesting to note that the MAGE sequences that display overlapping binding to HLA-A1, HLA-A29, and HLA-B44 constitute one of the most polymorphic regions in MAGE sequences ( Fig. 3and (1) ). This region is characterized by the presence of Glu-9, and usually Asp-7, residues before Tyr (Fig. 3). This constellation is essential for the observed cross-binding and is unique in the MAGE sequences. It is therefore conceivable that this region may be of special importance for the cellular immunity of MAGE-encoded tumor antigens.
From the MAGE
peptides shown in Fig. 3it was previously known that the
MAGE-1, -3, -4a, -4b, and -6 nonapeptides bind to HLA-A1 (4, 5, 6) and that MAGE-1- and
MAGE-3-specific CTLs can recognize the MAGE-1 161-169 and MAGE-3
168-176 peptides, respectively(4, 6) . The
present study shows that these, as well as the homologous peptides of
MAGE-2 and 12, can also bind to HLA-A29 and HLA-B44 (Fig. 4). To
find out whether this overlapping peptide binding is of immunological
relevance, in vitro CTL induction experiments with MAGE-3
peptides were performed. Thus far we were able to induce with the
MAGE-3 167-176 peptide HLA-B44-restricted CTLs that recognize
MAGE-3 tumor cells.
Since the genes that
encode the peptides under study are the most frequently expressed MAGEs
in tumor samples (1) , the overlapping MAGE peptide binding
described here suggests that immunotherapy of MAGE
tumors may be not only applicable to HLA-A1
but
also to HLA-A29
and HLA-B44
positive
patients.