(Received for publication, September 12, 1995)
From the
Pathogenic bacteria in the Neisseriaceae and Pasteurellaceae possess outer membrane proteins that specifically bind transferrin from the host as the first step in the iron acquisition process. As a logical progression from prior studies of the ligand-receptor interaction using biochemical approaches, we have initiated an approach involving the production of recombinant chimeric transferrins to further identify the regions of transferrin involved in receptor binding. In order to prepare bovine/human hybrids, the bovine transferrin gene was cloned, sequenced, and compared with the existing human transferrin gene sequence. After identification of potential splice sites, hybrid transferrin genes were constructed using the polymerase chain reaction-based approach of splicing by overlap extension. Five hybrid genes containing sequences from both bovine and human transferrin were constructed. Recombinant transferrins were produced in a baculovirus expression vector system and affinity-purified using concanavalin A-Sepharose. The recombinant proteins were analyzed for reactivity against polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies and assessed for binding to Neisseria meningitidis transferrin receptor proteins in solid-phase binding assays and affinity isolation experiments. These experiments enabled us to localize the regions of human transferrin predominantly involved in binding to the N. meningitidis receptor to amino acid residues 346-588. The construction of these chimeras provides unique tools for the investigation of transferrin binding to receptors from both human and bovine bacterial pathogens.
The requirement for iron is ubiquitous among living cells due to
its essential role in a large number of enzymes and redox proteins
involved in metabolic processes(1) . Despite an abundance of
iron in the mammalian host, it affords a hostile iron-restricted
environment to potential bacterial pathogens. This is manifested by the
binding of iron to the glycoproteins lactoferrin, found in mucosal
secretions, and transferrin (Tf) ()in the serum and
interstitial compartments. These modes of iron binding lower the
concentration of free aqueous iron to only 10
M(2) , which is far below that required to
support microbial growth. Thus the ability of microbial organisms to
acquire iron in vivo from these reservoirs is considered to be
an essential characteristic of bacteria that can successfully cause
disease(1, 3) .
Bacteria have evolved high affinity iron acquisition mechanisms designed to scavenge this essential nutrient from the external environment. One strategy involves the direct binding and removal of iron from the host's iron binding proteins by bacterial cell surface receptors. This receptor complex typically consists of two transferrin binding proteins, (Tbp1 and Tbp2)(4, 5) . Studies of isogenic mutants that lack the expression of Tbp1 and/or Tbp2 have shown that both proteins play an important role in the effective binding of transferrin (6, 7, 8, 9) . Based on comparative amino acid sequence analysis, the Tbp1 polypeptide is predicted to be an integral outer membrane protein, while Tbp2 appears to be anchored to the outer membrane via an N-terminal lipid anchor(8, 10, 11) . The specificity of these receptors for iron binding proteins of only their hosts is a characteristic feature of this mode of iron acquisition(12) .
Transferrin is a bilobed, monomeric glycoprotein of approximately 80 kDa(13) . The N-terminal and C-terminal lobes of Tf, which are similar in amino acid sequence and tertiary structure, are connected by an interdomain bridge that varies in length between different transferrin species. Native human transferrin (hTf) N-lobe occupies the initial 333 amino acids in the polypeptide; the bridge region from amino acid 333 to 341; and the C-lobe from amino acid 342 to the C terminus. Phylogenetic studies of different transferrin species have demonstrated highly conserved internal regions as well as conservation of three of the four iron-binding ligands(14) .
Previous studies have indicated that the N-linked oligosaccharide side chains of hTf are not required for binding to the bacterial transferrin binding proteins (Tbps), suggesting that the amino acids at the surface of human transferrin mediate receptor binding(15) . The observation that the human pathogens Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis recognize the same spectrum of primate transferrins, and that transferrin binding to these species is inhibited by the same monoclonal antibody, suggests that the transferrin-receptor interaction involves a similar region of transferrin in these species(16) . As well, the primary region of interaction has been localized by binding and affinity isolation experiments using proteolytically derived C-lobe and N-lobe fragments (17) . Using this approach both Tbp1 and Tbp2 of N. meningitidis were shown to interact exclusively with the C-lobe of human transferrin.
Although the use of proteolytically derived fragments has provided significant insight into the interaction of transferrin and its bacterial receptors, there are several inherent limitations to this biochemical approach. The pattern of proteolytic cleavage is a function of the properties of the protein substrate and protease involved and does not allow for selection of a particular peptide to be analyzed. In addition, protease cleavage may not necessarily result in dissociation of the proteolytic subfragments, and subsequent attempts at separating and isolating the resultant peptides (involving denaturing conditions and cleavage of disulfide bridges) may result in irreversible loss of conformation that is essential for the binding interaction. These factors may be responsible for the lack of success in preliminary attempts at obtaining further subfragments of hTf that retain sufficient binding avidity for detection in the binding and affinity isolation. Binding studies have demonstrated that the Tf receptors of certain bacteria interact with both Tf lobes(18) , indicating that an intact Tf molecule would provide more insight into these binding interactions.
Transferrins have a significant degree of conservation in amino acid sequence (>70%); thus, they are predicted to have a very similar overall tertiary structure. The conserved structure of transferrins, coupled with the specific interactions between a host transferrin and bacterial pathogen, has prompted us to investigate the potential of chimeric transferrins. This approach utilizes the intact transferrin molecule as a framework on which heterologous sequences can be exchanged in order to identify those sequences necessary for the interaction of transferrin with bacterial receptor complexes. By combining domains of a host transferrin with domains from an alternate species, the regions required for interacting with the bacterial receptor complex can be identified.
The DNA sequence for bovine transferrin cDNA was established using the T7 DNA polymerase system (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.) for manual sequencing and the Taq-DyeDeoxy terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems) for automated sequencing.
Human and bovine transferrin genes were spliced using the PCR technique of splicing by overlap extension (SOEing)(22) . Splice sites were selected at conserved regions in transferrins to reduce the possibility of perturbing the tertiary structure of transferrin in the chimeric transferrins and to also delineate possible binding regions to bacterial Tf receptors. Either human cDNA or bovine cDNA fragments were amplified by PCR using Pfu DNA polymerase to reduce the possibility of misincorporation mutations in the PCR products. Standard PCR conditions were used for the amplification of template DNA fragments to be used the subsequent SOEing reactions (initial cycle of 5 min at 95 °C, 5 min at 50 °C, and 5 min at 72 °C linked to 30 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 2 min at 50 °C, and 5 min at 72 °C; following the final cycle, an additional 10-min incubation at 72 °C was used to ensure that all amplified fragments were completely extended to the 3`-termini). The PCR products were purified by preparative agarose gel electrophoresis and quantitated prior to the subsequent PCR to generate hybrid transferrin cDNAs. Equal molar amounts of appropriate PCR fragments (0.2 pmol) were combined in the PCR mixture to generate a hybrid product defined by terminal oligonucleotide primers, which allowed amplification of the hybrid product. The PCR profile used for SOEing PCR fragments included an initial thermocycle file with a 5-min incubation at 94 °C, a 5-min ramp to 37 °C, a 5-min incubation at 37 °C, and a 5-min incubation at 72 °C. This was linked to a step file consisting of 30 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at 37 °C, and 5 min at 72 °C. Following the final cycles, an additional incubation step of 10 min at 72 °C was performed to ensure that all fragments were extended to the 3`-termini.
The hybrid genes with splice sites defined by the oligo primers shown in Table 1were amplified with terminal primers that had BglII sites at the termini for cloning in the BglII site of the pBlueBacll vector or with terminal primers that had a blunt 5`-end and a BglII site at the 3`-end for directional cloning in the vector pBlueBacIIIS-N. Chimeric hbTf1 was obtained using the primer pair HBTF5-5/HBTF3-4; chimeric hbTf2 by primer pair HBTF5-4/HBTF3-3; chimeric hbTf3 by HBTF5-1/HBTF3-2 and HBTF5-5/HBTF3-4; chimeric hbTf4 by HBTF5-1/HBTF3-2; and chimeric hbTf7 by HBTF5-5/HBTF3-3 (Table 1). PCR fragments were purified by agarose gel electrophoresis, digested with BglII, and ligated into the BglII site of pBlueBacIII or the Smal and BglII sites of pBlueBacIIIS-N. Plasmid DNA for each cloned hybrid gene was characterized by restriction enzyme digestion using enzymes that were unique to one species of transferrin or the other used to construct the hybrid gene. The DNA sequences of the termini of the hybrid genes as well as the junction sites created by SOEing the transferrin cDNAs were determined to ensure that the desired constructions were prepared.
The expression of transferrin by putative recombinant baculovirus clones was determined by Western blot analysis of the secreted protein fraction for insect cells (Sf21) grown in serum-free medium. Control Sf21 cells that were noninfected, infected with wild type Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus, or infected with recombinant virus constructed with only the pBlueBacIII vector had no detectable expression of transferrin protein as determined by Western blot analysis with rabbit antiserum prepared against human transferrin followed by horseradish peroxidase-labeled goat anti-rabbit Ab (data not shown).
Expressed recombinant Tf protein was isolated
from cell culture supernatant using a concanavalin A-Sepharose (Sigma)
affinity resin. Recombinant Tf protein was dialyzed against a sample
application buffer (50 mM sodium acetate, 1 mM NaCl,
1 mM MgCl, CaCl
, 1 mM
MnCl
) and added to the concanavalin A column, and the
column was washed with 3-5
bed volume of application
buffer. Specifically bound Tf was eluted using application buffer
containing 200 mM methyl-
-D-mannopyranoside,
dialyzed against a 20 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer,
lyophilized, and resuspended in bicarbonate/citrate buffer (100 mM sodium bicarbonate, 100 mM sodium citrate, pH 8.6).
Recombinant Tf recovered at this step typically was at 400-800
µg/ml concentration.
The predicted protein sequence for bTf was obtained from the DNA sequence and compared with the hTf sequence (Fig. 1). As shown in Fig. 1, there is an overall 70% amino acid sequence identity between hTf and bTf, with most sequence differences occurring in small clusters that were found throughout the length of the protein.
Figure 1: Alignment of bTf and hTf amino acid sequences. Alignment of the predicted protein sequences for bovine transferrin and human transferrin is shown. The amino acid sequence, translated from the cDNA sequence, is shown in single-letter code for the bovine transferrin and the human transferrin. The conserved residues are shown as periods in the sequence of human transferrin. Gaps inserted into either the bovine or the human transferrin to achieve the optimum alignment of the sequences are indicated by hyphens. Numbers assigned to the amino acids distinguish the N terminus of the signal peptide(-19) for the precursor form of transferrin and the N terminus of the mature transferrin (+1). The numbering system includes the gaps inserted into the sequences; hence, the total length of each mature protein is shown as 688 amino acids, although the mature human transferrin is actually 679 amino acids and the mature bovine transferrin is 685 amino acids. The N-lobe and C-lobe regions of transferrin are separated by the bridge peptide designated by the underlined residues 331-352. The indicated Asp, Tyr, and His residues (*) are instrumental in binding the ferric iron atom in each lobe, and the Arg residues (=) bind the synergistic carbonate in each lobe. The indicated Asn residues (#) in the C-lobe are the N-linked glycosylation sites in human transferrin and the potential N-linked glycosylation sites in bovine transferrin.
Comparison of bTf with the cysteines that form the known disulfide bridges of hTf (24) revealed that all cysteines were present except those predicted to form disulfide bridge 10 in the N-lobe (corresponding to amino acids 137 and 336 in hTf). The predicted absence of disulfide bridge 10 in bTf may result in certain conformational differences between human and bovine transferrin and particularly in chimeras generated from these two proteins.
Asn and Asn
, which are N-linked
glycosylation sites in human transferrin, are not conserved in bovine
transferrin. Evidence for glycosylation of porcine transferrin at
Asn
has been recently presented(25) , and since
there is a corresponding residue in bTf (Asn
), this may
also be the site of glycosylation.
Figure 2: Construction of chimeric transferrins. The chimeric proteins are indicated by bars representing the linear amino acid sequence that is identical to hTf (gray) or bTf (black). The lines at the top indicate the linear DNA sequence encoding the indicated domains in the indicated lobes. hbTf1 is composed of the hTf N-lobe and the bTf bridge domain and C-lobe, spliced together at the amino acid 344-345 peptide bond. hbTf2 is comprised of the N-lobe, bridge region, and 70% of the C-lobe from hTf, with the C-terminal amino acids (starting at amino acid 598) originating from bTf. hbTf3 contains 80% of hTf N-lobe (up to amino acid 254), 20% of bTf N-lobe, bTf bridge region (amino acids 255-350), and hTf C-lobe. hbTf4 contains 80% of hTf N-lobe (up to amino acid 254) and 20% of the N-lobe, bridge region, and C-lobe of bTf. hbTf7 contains bTf N-lobe and bridge region and the C-lobe (starting at amino acid 351) of hTf.
Analysis of the
amino acid sequence composition of the chimeric transferrins revealed
potential structural differences from the native transferrins based on
disulfide bridge locations. The absence of Cys and
Cys
(forming cystine 10) in bovine transferrin N-lobe (Fig. 1) creates an absence of this disulfide bridge in hbTf3,
hbTf4, and hbTf7. As the N-lobes of hbTf3 and hbTf4 are comprised of
human transferrin up to amino acid 254, they both contain a free
cysteine residue at amino acid 137.
Resolution of the rTf by SDS-PAGE, followed by electroblotting and staining with Amido Black, demonstrated a homogeneous preparation with a band migrating at about 80 kDa (Fig. 3). The isolation of a single species of rTf of the expected size indicated that there was efficient translation of a full-length product and that the processing and export of this product was normal. The electroblotted proteins could be detected by binding of concanavalin A, suggesting that glycosylation was occurring normally in the BEV system, which was the basis for isolation by concanavalin A-Sepharose. The ability to fully iron load the rTfs further indicated that the recombinants were identical to native transferrin.
Figure 3: SDS-PAGE analysis of recombinant transferrin protein. Samples (2 µg of protein/well) were subjected to electrophoresis on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels. Following transfer to Immobilon membrane by electroblotting, protein was detected by staining with Amido Black. Lane 1, rhTf; Lane 2, rbTf; Lane 3, hbTf1; Lane 4, hbTf2; Lane 5, hbTf3; Lane 6, hbTf4; Lane 7, hbTf7. Numbers to the left refer to the molecular mass of standard proteins in kilodaltons.
Three monoclonal antibodies, raised against hTf(16) , were utilized to probe the structure of the recombinant transferrins. Proteolytically-derived N-lobe and C-lobe subfragments of hTf were included in the analysis to assist in identification of the epitopes recognized by the anti-hTf monoclonal antibodies (Table 2). mAb 44-63 reacted with proteolytically-derived C-lobe but not N-lobe, indicating that the epitope recognized by this mAb is located in the C-lobe. This mAb reacted with hTf, hbTf2, and hbTf3, which all contain C-lobe or a large portion thereof as well as most or all of the N-lobe. In contrast, hbTf7, which only contains the hTf C-lobe, did not react with mAb 44-63. mAb 44-33 reacted with proteolytically derived N-lobe but not C-lobe, indicating that the epitope recognized by this antibody is located in the N-lobe. This mAb reacted with rhTf, hbTf1, hbTf2, hbTf3, and hbTf4, which all contain intact hTf N-lobe or large portions thereof. rbTf and hbTf7 did not react with mAb 44-33. mAb 39-49, which blocks binding of hTf to the Tbps of N. meningitidis(16) , recognized epitopes on rhTf, hbTf2, and hbTf3. These chimeras all contain portions of both hTf N-lobe and C-lobe. hbTf1, hbTf4, and hbTf7, which contain regions of hTf but lack regions common to both lobes of hTf, did not react with mAb 39-49.
In Fig. 4it can be seen that recombinant rhTf was able to compete for membrane receptor to a similar degree as commercial hTf. The chimeras hbTf2, hbTf3, and hbTf7 also demonstrated blocking of conjugate binding to the membrane preparations. No blocking by commercial bTf, recombinant rbTf, hbTf1, or hbTf4 was evident.
Figure 4: Competition binding assay evaluating the binding of recombinant transferrins. Aliquots of iron-deficient membranes (1 µg/aliquot) from N. meningitidis strain M982 were spotted onto Immobilon paper and exposed to mixtures containing horseradish peroxidase-hTf and commercial or recombinant transferrins at the following concentrations: 70 nM (A); 17.5 nM (B) 4.4 nM (C); 1.1 nM (D); 0.275 nM (E); 0.069 nM (F); 0.017 nM (G); and 0.004 nM (H). Bound horseradish peroxidase-hTf was subsequently detected by assaying for horseradish peroxidase activity as described under ``Experimental Procedures.''
Figure 5:
Affinity isolation of transferrin receptor
proteins. Solubilized iron-deficient membranes from the indicated
species were mixed with hTf-Sepharose either directly (lane
1), or after premixing with excess concentrations of competing
commercial hTf (lane 2), commercial bTf (lane 3),
recombinant rhTf (lane 4), recombinant rbTf (lane 5),
chimeric hbTf1 (lane 6), chimeric hbTf2 (lane 7),
chimeric hbTf3 (lane 8), chimeric hbTf4 (lane 9) or
chimeric hbTf7 (lane 10). The receptor proteins were then
isolated, electrophoresed on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and detected by
Coomassie Blue staining as described under ``Methods.''
, Tbp1;
, Tbp2. Numbers to the left refer to the molecular mass of standard proteins in
kilodaltons.
The transferrins from human and bovine species exhibit conservation in amino acid sequence and three-dimensional structure (14) . Despite this, bacterial pathogens' transferrin binding proteins are specific for transferrin from their host species. This distinct interaction has previously been shown to be dictated by protein structure and not N-linked oligosaccharides(15) , indicating that genetic approaches for investigating the ligand-receptor interaction would be appropriate. Thus to take advantage of the properties of the transferrins and bacterial receptors we elected to prepare human/bovine hybrid transferrins for analyzing the ligand-receptor interaction. In this preliminary study we prepared chimeric Tfs that were composites of the respective lobes and bridge regions from these species, as this was a suitable starting point for evaluating the effectiveness of this approach.
There were a number of options for hybrid transferrin gene expression for the production of recombinant transferrins. Mammalian cells should be an appropriate host for expression of these genes, and several studies have demonstrated that recombinant human transferrin and lactoferrin can be effectively produced in a baby hamster kidney cell expression system(23, 26, 27) . Analysis of several properties such as estimated molecular mass, glycosylation, and iron binding indicated that the recombinant proteins were essentially identical to the native protein, indicating that the recombinant proteins were properly processed and exported in this system. Significant concentrations of secreted recombinant protein could be obtained in the culture medium, and efficient methods of chromatographic purification have been developed(23) .
However, there were several limitations of this expression system that prompted us to consider utilizing a baculovirus expression system. The preparation of cell lines for production of recombinant transferrin is time-consuming and relatively labor-intensive, and the requirement for selection of gene duplication (by methotrexate resistance) for high level production has some inherent potential for instability. In addition, the absolute requirement for fetal calf serum as a growth supplement can complicate subsequent purification of recombinant Tf due to the presence of fetal bovine Tf.
The affinity isolation of the recombinant Tfs with concanavalin A in this study indicates that they were glycosylated, and according to the results from prior studies with the baculovirus expression system(28, 29) , the glycosylation was probably identical to that of the native Tfs. The isolation of hbTf1 and hbTf4 by concanavalin A suggests that previously undetermined glycosylation sites for bTf are also in the C-lobe. In addition, when considering properties such as estimated molecular weight, iron binding, the ability to bind to the bacterial receptors ( Fig. 4and Fig. 5), and anti-hTf mAbs (Table 2), the recombinant hTf could not be differentiated from native hTf. The ability to obtain significant quantities (10-20 mg/liter) of secreted protein in culture media devoid of supplemental fetal calf serum enabled us to use a simple lectin affinity step for obtaining pure preparations of recombinant protein. These results indicate that the baculovirus expression system is an appropriate and effective alternative system for production of recombinant transferrin.
The recent demonstration of production of recombinant lactoferrin in an inducible Aspergillus nidulans expression system that was indistinguishable from native human lactoferrin with respect to size, immunoreactivity, and the ability to bind iron (30) indicates that even more heterologous eucaryotic expression systems may be effective. Although this suggests that more convenient yeast expression systems (31) can be considered, the functional attributes of the recombinant proteins, such as receptor binding, will have to be evaluated. Although it is even possible to produce recombinant transferrins in procaryotic systems such as E. coli(32) , there is a lack of suitable post-translational processing (i.e. glycosylation proteolytic processing)(33) . The large number of disulfide bridges in these proteins makes it quite unlikely to achieve proper refolding of these proteins using the E. coli expression system.
The rationale for utilization of recombinant chimeric transferrins for delineation of the receptor binding region was based on the assumption that the high degree of identity and predicted tertiary structure of hTf and bTf would ensure that the chimeras attained a proper conformation. The glycosylation of these proteins and their ability to bind iron suggest that the general structure of these recombinant proteins is correct. The fact that all of the chimeras containing portions of the hTf C-lobe (hbTf2, hbTf3, and hbTf7; Fig. 4) were capable of binding to the meningococcal receptor is also consistent with this prediction. Similarly, the reactivity of the chimeras containing portions of the hTf N-lobe (hbTf1, hbTf2, hbTf3, and hbTf4; Table 2) with a monoclonal antibody directed against the N-lobe, which loses reactivity when hTf is boiled and treated with reducing agents, suggests that at least some conformational epitopes in this lobe are present in the chimeras. Similarly the reactivity of hbTf2 and hbTf3 with mAb 39-49 and mAb 44-63 (Table 2) indicate that these chimeras possess epitopes present in native hTf.
Although hbTf7 appears to be properly glycosylated, is capable of binding iron and is as effective as native hTf in competing for the bacterial receptor proteins in the binding and affinity isolation assays ( Fig. 4and Fig. 5), the inability to bind mAbs 39-49 and 44-63 (Table 2) indicates that there are subtle structural differences from native hTf. This failure to bind the specific mAbs cannot be solely attributed to a lack of stability of this chimeric protein under conditions of SDS-PAGE and electroblotting, as the lack of binding to mAb 44-63 is also observed in solid phase bindings using purified preparations of the protein directly (data not shown). This might be attributable to conformations that are dependent upon interactions with portions of the hTf N-lobe (see results with mAb 39-49, Table 2) that are present in hbTf2 and hbTf3. Significant N-lobe and C-lobe association has been demonstrated in human lactoferrin, where cleavage of lactoferrin by trypsin at amino acids 283-284 did not result in fragment dissociation until strong denaturing conditions were used despite a lack of covalent linkage between the two fragments(34) . A strong lobe-lobe interaction is likely also occurring in transferrin species, and this might be expected to affect some conformational epitopes in the C-lobe region. This scenario for hbTf7 could result in a steric hindrance of the bTf N-lobe on mAb 44-63 binding to its C-lobe epitope.
However, it is probably more likely that the lack of mAb 44-63 binding to hbTf7 is due to a mutational event that occurred during the preparation of this recombinant virus. This possibility cannot be excluded by sequencing of the hybrid gene in the expression vector, as the mutational event could have occurred during the subsequent steps of coinfection or isolation and propagation of the recombinant virus. We are planning to prepare a set of additional constructs only containing segments of the hTf C-lobe and will include repetition of the construction of hbTf7 to address this issue. In spite of the subtle structural differences that were revealed by analysis with mAbs, hbTf7 was nevertheless useful for the originally intended purpose, identification of the receptor binding domain.
mAb 39-49 binds the same spectrum of primate transferrins as do the Tbps of selected human pathogens N. meningitidis, H. influenzae, and M. catarrhalis(16) . Furthermore, receptors from these pathogens are inhibited from binding hTf by mAb 39-49. These results imply that the mAb 39-49 epitope is in a region that may be involved in binding the receptor complex. However, hbTf7 was still able to bind immobilized Tbps of N. meningitidis M982 and competitively inhibit their affinity isolation ( Fig. 4and 5), yet it lacked the epitope for mAb 39-49, indicating that the epitope for mAb 39-49 is distinct from the binding domain. Furthermore, mAb 39-49 binds hbTf2, yet hbTf2 cannot competitively inhibit affinity isolation of the Tbps of M982. The C-lobe of hTf has been shown to mediate binding to the Tbps of human bacterial pathogens, and the lack of the mAb 39-49 epitope on biochemically derived hTf C-lobe does not appear to affect its Tbp binding, providing further evidence that the Tbp binding domain and the mAb 39-49 epitope are distinct.
Despite its apparent absence on the N-lobe or C-lobe fragments, it is possible to assign the mAb 39-49 epitope to a particular region on hTf using the results obtained in this study. mAb 39-49 binds to recombinant transferrins, which contain regions of both lobes of hTf. Furthermore, fragmenting of hTf into isolated N-lobes and C-lobes destroys mAb 39-49 binding. These observations imply that the mAb 39-49 epitope is in a region comprised of both lobes or an epitope that is dependent upon the interlobe interaction. The blocking of receptor binding by this mAb suggests that it is blocking by steric hindrance and implies that this epitope may occupy the same face of Tf as the Tbp binding determinants.
A solid-phase competitive binding assay was utilized to determine the relative effectiveness of the recombinant transferrins to compete with horseradish peroxidase-hTf for available receptor in an immobilized membrane preparation. The most obvious characteristic of those recombinants that could compete effectively in this assay is the presence of the C-lobe of hTf or, in the case of hbTf2, a substantial portion of the hTf C-lobe. The apparent requirement of hTf C-lobe for success in this assay containing meningococcal membranes, is consistent with previous studies involving proteolytically derived hTf C-lobe (17) . Furthermore these results with hbTf2 further localize the domain required for binding in the solid-phase binding assay to amino acid residues 346-588.
The affinity isolation assay provides two additional features by analyzing the interaction between ligand and the individual receptor proteins and the requiring greater avidity and stability of binding than can be assessed in the solid-phase binding assays. The competitive inhibition of the isolation of both Tbp1 and Tbp2 of N. meningitidis M982 by chimeras hbTf3 and hbTf7 (Fig. 5) is consistent with previous results, which indicated that regions of hTf C-lobe are involved in binding to both receptor proteins(17) . The inability of hbTf2 to effectively inhibit isolation of the receptor proteins, while resulting in effective inhibition in the solid-phase binding assay, suggests that it may lack regions that are necessary for the more avid binding required in the affinity isolation procedure. Thus the ``C-tail'' either participates in the binding interaction or is important for maintaining a conformation required for avid binding. Since no disulfide bond changes are expected by substituting the terminal amino acids of hTf with bTf (as in hbTf2), the different avidity of binding during affinity isolation may be due to localized sequence differences between hTf and bTf in the C-terminal region. These results are also consistent with the hypothesis that transferrin binding involves a number of amino acid sequences that are oriented in proximity to facilitate binding, and the loss of a single region with the preservation of the remaining sequences reduces binding in a graded rather than all-or-none process.
The prospect of multiple binding
domains participating in receptor interaction was further investigated
by comparative sequence analysis and molecular modeling of the chimeric
Tf structures. Inspection of the aligned hTf and bTf amino acid
sequences revealed significant stretches of homology and small clusters
of divergence throughout the polypeptide. It is likely that the
homologous regions are structural determinants that provide for the
conserved three-dimensional structure of transferrins. Analysis of
transferrin sequences from a number of different species (14) revealed that conserved regions are in internal
-sheets of domains 1 and 2. Using the known structure of human
lactoferrin(35) , three-dimensional representations of the
recombinant transferrins were generated. A preliminary comparison
revealed that certain divergent sequences were localized to the surface
regions of the protein. For instance the model of hbTf2 structure shows
divergent bTf residues of the C-tail that are located at exposed
surface loops. Amino acids Ser
-Lys
are localized to a face of the C-lobe that transverses the two domains
in a random coil fashion as the polypeptide winds its way toward the
bridge region before terminating. This region is located near
Asn
-Asp
due to disulfide C8
(Cys
-Cys
); thus, the presence of a
divergent bTf sequence in one surface loop could be responsible for the
lower avidity of hbTf2 binding to meningococcal Tbps in the affinity
isolation experiment. Two additional surface loops containing divergent
sequences are present in the Tf C-lobe, raising the possibility that
effective binding to the receptor may involve these four regions. The
putative surface exposure of these divergent regions implies that they
may provide the species-specific binding regions for bacterial Tbps and
species-specific epitopes for anti-hTf and anti-bTf antibody.
In this study we are able to exploit two characteristics of transferrins and transferrin binding to bacterial receptors in order to facilitate our understanding of this interaction. In particular we were able to localize the regions of hTf primarily responsible for binding the Tbps of N. meningitidis M982 to amino acid residues 346-588. The development of chimeric transferrins as more accurate tools of study utilizes the interspecies conservation of transferrin structure as well as the transferrin species-specific binding by particular bacterial pathogens. Although subtle conformational differences could be detected in one chimeric construct, these studies clearly demonstrate that hybrid human/bovine transferrins can be constructed that reflect these two properties. By creating chimeric transferrins from human and bovine sources, it is now possible to investigate the binding characteristics of both human and bovine pathogens that utilize a Tbp-receptor complex to acquire iron during the infection process.