©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Regulation of Ribosomal DNA Transcription during Contraction-induced Hypertrophy of Neonatal Cardiomyocytes (*)

(Received for publication, July 26, 1995; and in revised form, October 19, 1995)

Ross D. Hannan (§) Joachim Luyken (¶) Lawrence I. Rothblum (**)

From the Sigfried and Janet Weis Center for Research, Geisinger Clinic, Danville, Pennsylvania 17822

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

Cardiac hypertrophy requires protein accumulation. This results largely from an increased capacity for protein synthesis, which in turn is the result of an elevated rate of ribosome biogenesis. The process of ribosome formation is regulated at the level of transcription of the ribosomal RNA genes. In this study, we examined the amounts and activities of various components of the ribosomal DNA transcription apparatus in contraction-arrested neonatal cardiomyocytes and in spontaneously contracting cardiomyocytes that hypertrophy. Nuclear run-on assays demonstrated that spontaneously contracting cardiomyocytes supported a 2-fold increased rate of ribosomal DNA transcription. However, enzymatic assay of total solubilized RNA polymerase I and Western blots demonstrated that contraction-induced increases in ribosomal RNA synthesis were not accompanied by increased activity or amounts of RNA polymerase I. In contrast, accelerated ribosome biogenesis was accompanied by an increased amount of the ribosomal DNA transcription factor, UBF. Immunoprecipitation of [P]orthophosphate-labeled UBF from hypertrophying, neonatal cardiomyocytes indicated that the accumulated UBF protein was phosphorylated and, thus, in the active form. UBF mRNA levels began to increase within 3-6 h of the initiation of contraction and preceded the elevation in rDNA transcription. Nuclear run-on assays demonstrated increased rates of transcription of the UBF gene. Transfection of chimeric reporter constructs containing deletions of the 5`-flanking region of the UBF gene revealed the presence of contraction response elements between -1189 and -665 relative to the putative start of transcription. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that UBF is an important factor in the regulation of rDNA transcription during contraction-mediated neonatal cardiomyocyte hypertrophy.


INTRODUCTION

Mechanical stimulation, in its various forms, is a primary determinant of cardiomyocyte phenotype and hypertrophic growth both in vivo and in vitro (reviewed in (1) and (2) ). For instance, unattached feline cardiomyocytes maintained in cell suspension rapidly lose the organizational characteristics of differentiated cardiac muscle and resemble undifferentiated neonatal cardiomyocytes(3) . In contrast, attachment of adult cardiomyocytes to laminin-coated substrates inhibits the loss of characteristic biochemical and functional properties(3) . In recent reports, linear deformation (passive stretch) has been demonstrated to increase cellular growth as measured by rates of RNA and protein synthesis and protein accumulation in cultured neonatal cardiomyocytes(4, 5) .

Spontaneous contractile activity also appears to be an important regulator of cardiomyocyte growth(6, 7, 8) . For example, spontaneously contracting neonatal cardiomyocytes in culture accumulate RNA and protein at a faster rate than noncontracting, i.e. arrested, cells. This growth occurs in the absence of changes in DNA content or cell number (hypertrophic growth) and appears to be largely independent of humoral or neuronal factors(8) . Increased protein levels are due to an increase in the fractional rate of protein synthesis in the absence of changes in the rate constants of protein degradation. The elevated RNA content represents, for the most part, an accrual of ribosomes, i.e. ribosomal RNA (rRNA), which is necessary to support the elevated cellular capacity to produce protein(9) . However, little, if anything, is known about the signals which couple contraction to ribosome biogenesis and subsequent protein synthesis.

In other mammalian cell types and other classes of organisms, ribosome content is regulated largely by alterations in the rate of transcription of the rRNA genes (rDNA) to produce 45 S preribosomal RNA, rather than by changes in the processing or stability of ribosomal RNA (rRNA)(10, 11) . Similarly, the accelerated levels of ribosome biogenesis observed during contraction-induced hypertrophy of cultured neonatal cardiomyocytes is linked to elevated rates of rRNA synthesis(12) . Increased rDNA transcription also accounted for the accelerated rates of ribosome biogenesis that follow exposure to norepinephrine(13) , phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate(14) , or endothelin I. (^1)Overall, these results emphasize that rDNA transcription is a central point in the control of cardiomyocyte protein synthesis during cardiac growth.

Efficient transcription of ribosomal DNA promoters in vitro requires at least two DNA-binding proteins, UBF and SL-1, as well as RNA polymerase I(10, 11, 15) . In addition, recognition by RNA polymerase I of the protein-DNA complexes that form on the promoter requires the presence or activity of at least one polymerase-associated factor referred to as either TF1C or TIF-1A(16, 17) . SL-1 is absolutely required for basal levels of transcription in vitro(10, 11) , and UBF increases the efficiency of template utilization raising the level of transcription(10, 11, 18) . When fractionated by SDS-PAGE, (^2)mammalian UBF consists of two proteins, 97 and 94 kDa, that are referred to as UBF1 and UBF2, respectively(10, 11, 20) . They are coded for by two different mRNAs that result from alternative processing of a single transcript(17) . UBF1 and UBF2 bind to DNA and form homo- and heterodimers, but only UBF1 has been shown to activate transcription in vitro(19, 21, 22) .

The activity of UBF is regulated by post-translational and/or transcriptional mechanisms(23, 24, 25, 26) . In regard to the former mechanism, UBF is a phosphoprotein whose ability to activate transcription is reduced when dephosphorylated(23, 24) . When CHO cells were serum-starved, and rDNA transcription significantly reduced, the phosphorylation state of UBF also decreased(23) . In contrast, the decreased rDNA transcription observed during serum starvation of NIH3T3 fibroblasts was characterized by decreased UBF content. In this example, the decrease in UBF protein was preceded by a reduction in UBF mRNA content(26) .

We have examined the rDNA transcription apparatus of contraction-induced hypertrophic cardiomyocytes in order to determine which components of this system are altered in response to the hypertrophic stimulus. We show here that the accelerated rate of rDNA transcription during contraction-mediated neonatal cardiomyocyte hypertrophy is not accompanied by increased amounts or activity of RNA polymerase I enzyme, but by a significant increase in the protein and mRNA levels of UBF. Nuclear run-on assays of UBF mRNA synthesis revealed that at least part of the increase in UBF content was the result of increased transcription of the UBF gene. Transient transfection of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter constructs linked to fragments 5` of the translation initiation site of the UBF gene demonstrated the presence of contraction response elements between -1189 and -665 relative to the start of transcription (+1).


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cardiomyocyte Culture

Neonatal cardiomyocytes were isolated from the ventricles of day-old Sprague-Dawley rat pups as described previously and were maintained in defined serum-free media(27) , containing 0.1 mmol/liter bromodeoxyuridine, and maintained in the same defined media for the duration of the experiments. KCl (50 mmol/liter) was added to the medium to prevent the spontaneous contraction characteristic of neonatal cardiomyocytes plated at high density(6, 8, 9, 12) . Cultures prepared in this manner consisted of 85-95% cardiomyocytes. For some experiments, the isolated cardiomyocytes were purified further by centrifugation through Percoll (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.) step gradients as described(28) . We were unable to detect fibroblasts in these cultures as determined by immunocytochemical staining with an anti-fibronectin antibody.

Induction of Cardiomyocyte Hypertrophy

After 2 days in defined media (day 3 of culture), spontaneous contraction of the cardiomyocytes was reinitiated by reducing the level of KCl in the media from 50 mM to 5 mM. Spontaneous contraction occurred within 1-2 h of the media change. Control, contractile arrested cells were maintained in media containing 50 mM KCl. After the appropriate length of treatment, cells were harvested and processed for the determination of protein and DNA, or for Northern, Western, or nuclear run-on assays.

Protein and DNA Determination

Cardiomyocytes were solubilized directly in 1 times SSC (0.15 mol/liter NaCl, 0.015 mol/liter sodium citrate), 0.25% sodium dodecyl sulfate and frozen at -20 °C until analysis. DNA determinations were performed by the fluorometric method of Cesarone et al.(29) using calf thymus DNA as a standard. Protein was assayed using the Bio-Rad DC assay kit with immunoglobulin G (IgG) as the protein standard. Growth was expressed as the percentage increase in the protein to DNA ratio of spontaneously contracting cells over time as compared to contractile-arrested (control) cells. Experiments were repeated a minimum of 5 times from separate cardiomyocyte preparations.

Determination of Total Solubilized RNA Polymerase I Activity

RNA Polymerase I activity was determined in solubilized preparations derived from arrested and contracting neonatal cardiomyocytes as described previously(30, 31) . Briefly, 80 times 10^6 cells were resuspended in 3 volumes of TGED buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 25% glycerol, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride), the salt concentration was adjusted to 0.32-0.34 M with 4 M (NH(4))(2)SO(4), and the suspension was sonicated four times while cooling in an ice slurry. The sonicates were overlaid with mineral oil and centrifuged at 67,000 times g for 90 min. The salt concentration of the supernatant was adjusted to 100 mM (NH(4))(2)SO(4) by the addition of TGED, and the suspension was centrifuged at 67,000 times g for 90 min. This supernatant was diluted to a final salt concentration of 50 mM (NH(4))(2)SO(4) and again centrifuged for 90 min at 67,000 times g. The supernatant obtained from this third centrifugation (F3) was frozen in aliquots at -70 °C until assayed for polymerase activity. Polymerase activity was measured by incubating 50 µl of F3 with 50 µl of substrate mixture (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 5 mM beta-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM ATP, 1 mM CTP, 1 mM GTP, 16 µM UTP, 2.0 µCi of [^3H]UTP (35 Ci/mmol), 3.4 mM MgCl(2), and 0.5 mg/ml calf thymus DNA) at 37 °C for 15 min. The incorporation of [^3H]UMP in RNA was measured as described(30, 31) . RNA polymerase II activity was measured by the difference of synthesis in the absence and presence of 5 µg/ml alpha-amanitin, and RNA polymerase I by the incorporation that took place in the presence of 200 µg/ml alpha-amanitin.

RNA Extraction and Northern Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from cardiomyocytes as described(32) . Following electrophoresis through 1.2% denaturing (formaldehyde) agarose gels (33) , the RNA (30 µg/lane) was blotted onto Zeta-Probe (Bio-Rad) membranes according to the manufacturer's instructions. Detection and quantitation of UBF mRNA was carried out as described(13, 34) .

Western Analysis

Cardiomyocytes were rinsed 3 times in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, then scraped directly into 1 times SSC, 0.25% SDS and stored at -20 °C until analysis. Protein and DNA determination was performed as described above, and Western blots with anti-UBF and anti-RNA polymerase I antibodies were carried out as described previously(13) .

Nuclear Run-on Transcription

Transcription from the rDNA and UBF promoters in isolated cardiomyocyte nuclei was measured by the hybridization of in vitro synthesized, P-labeled run-on transcripts to a 45 S rDNA clone (pU5.1E/X) or UBF cDNA clone (pBSrUBF405), respectively, as described previously(26) . Equivalent amounts of nuclei from control and contracting cardiomyocytes were assayed per time point. The hybridization conditions and the post-hybridization washes were the same as described(35) . Hybridization was detected by autoradiography.

Phosphorylation Studies

Measurement of the phosphorylation status of UBF was carried out by immunoprecipitation of [P]orthophosphate-labeled UBF protein from cardiomyocyte extracts using polyclonal anti-UBF antisera(23) . Briefly, arrested neonatal cardiomyocytes were prelabeled with [P]orthophosphate (1 mCi/60-mm dish) for 12 h after which the cells were then removed into fresh media containing 1 mCi/dish [P]orthophosphate and either 50 mM KCl (arrested) or 5 mM KCl (contracting). After the appropriate time, the cells were washed twice in phosphate-buffered saline and scraped directly into 500 µl of modified RIPA buffer(36) . UBF was immunopurified from the extracts by incubation overnight at 4 °C with 50 µl of anti-UBF antisera coupled to 20 µl of protein A-agarose beads. After 4 times 1 ml washes in modified RIPA buffer(36) , the beads were boiled for 10 min in the presence of 2 times Laemmli solubilizing buffer. Phosphorylated UBF1 and UBF2 were resolved by SDS-PAGE and visualized by autoradiography.

Construction of Chimeric UBF Genes

Six fusion genes were used in this study (see Fig. 6). The genes were generating by polymerase chain reaction from the UBF gene using primers specific for the designated 5` ends of each construct and a common 3` primer (5`-TCGGTCGCGCTGGCCGGG-3`) that was complementary to nucleotides +78 to +93 of the UBF gene (+1 being the transcription initiation site) (37) . (^3)The polymerase chain reaction fragments were inserted into the HindIII and XbaI sites of pCAT-Basic (Promega Corp.). The orientations of the inserts were confirmed by sequencing and restriction endonuclease mapping.


Figure 6: Analysis of UBF promoter activity by transient expression in arrested and contracting cardiomyocytes. A, neonatal cardiomyocytes were transfected with either pCAT0 (lanes 1 and 2), pCATUB .75 (lanes 3 and 4), or pCATUB 3.2 (lanes 5 and 6), and either arrested by the addition of 50 mM KCl to the serum-free defined media (lanes 1, 3, and 5) or allowed to contract (lanes 2, 4, and 6). Twenty-four hours later, extracts were made from the cardiomyocytes and assayed for CAT activity. B, neonatal cardiomyocytes were co-transfected with the indicated constructs of the UBF promoter linked to the bacterial chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene and the pCMV-betaGal construct and treated as described in A. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were harvested, and extracts were prepared and assayed for CAT and beta-galactosidase activity. The CAT activity in each extract was normalized for the recovery of beta-galactosidase activity to correct for differences in transfection efficiency. The normalized activity of pCATUB 3.2 in arrested cardiomyocytes is indicated as 100%. The normalized activities of the remainder of the constructs are shown as the percentage of pCATUB 3.2. The results depicted are the average of 3 separate experiments ± S.D.** and *, significant difference from control, p < 0.001 and 0.05, respectively.



Transfection and CAT Assays

After 2 days in culture, contracting, neonatal cardiomyocytes, cultured as described above, were co-transfected with the indicated constructs (3 µg) and pCMV-betaGal (0.5 µg) (Promega) using Lipofectamine (Life Technologies, Inc.). Five hours after transfection, the culture medium was replaced with fresh serum-free, defined medium containing either 5 mM (beating) or 50 mM (arrested) KCl. Twenty-four hours later, the cells were harvested, and lysates were prepared as described (33) and frozen at -80 °C until assayed for either chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) or beta-galactosidase activity(33) . The synthesis of acetylated chloramphenicol was measured by separating acetylated [^14C]chloramphenicol from unmodified [^14C]chloramphenicol by TLC(33) . The results of the CAT assays were normalized by the results of the beta-galactosidase assays to correct for variations in the efficiency of transfection.

Preparation of Figures

Autoradiograms obtained from Western, Northern, TLC plates, and nuclear run-on analyses were scanned and converted to 8-bit TIFF Bitmap files using a laser densitometer and ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics). Alternatively, the radioactive samples were scanned using a Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager, and the images were converted to TIFF files. The TIFF Bitmap files were subsequently imported directly and unmodified into CorelDraw! where labels and headings were attached. Completed figures were output to print film on a Montage FRL Lasergraphics or to paper using a Tektronix Phaser 440.

Statistics

Statistical comparison of control groups with treated groups are expressed as the average ± the sample standard deviation (S.D.). Levels of significance (p values) were determined by a paired Student's t test. A value of 0.05 or lower was considered to be a statistically significant difference between the groups compared.


RESULTS

Induction of Cardiac Hypertrophy and rDNA Transcription

Neonatal cardiomyocytes prepared as described under ``Materials and Methods'' were maintained at a density of 4 times 10^6 cells/60-mm dish in media containing 50 mM KCl to arrest spontaneous contraction. Experiments were initiated after 3 days of culture to allow the cells to adapt to the culture conditions. During the subsequent 4 days in culture, there were no significant changes in protein/DNA ratios in contraction-arrested neonatal cardiomyocytes (Fig. 1A). These results are similar to those obtained by others using this system(8, 9) .


Figure 1: Contraction regulates protein accumulation and rDNA transcription in neonatal cardiomyocytes. A, at the times indicated, total cellular protein was determined for cultures of contraction-arrested or spontaneously contracting neonatal cardiomyocytes and normalized for the DNA content per plate. Results represent 7 separate experiments and are expressed as the average percentage increase ± S.D. in the protein to DNA ratio of contracting cells as compared to control (arrested) cells. *, significant difference from control cells, p < 0.001. B, neonatal cardiomyocytes, cultured as indicated, were contraction-arrested or allowed to spontaneously contract for 6-72 h, and nuclei were isolated from 16 times 10^6 cells per time point. Ribosomal DNA transcription was measured as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' Radiolabeled rRNA transcripts were purified from the reaction mixture and hybridized to 45 S rDNA (clone pU5.1E/X) or control pUC19 DNA. After stringent washes, the hybrids were visualized by autoradiography (see inset). The radioactivity of 45 S run-on transcripts obtained from 7 separate experiments was quantified by laser densitometry and is presented as the average percentage increase ± S.D. in rDNA transcription in response to contraction over the transcription observed in contraction-arrested cells. *, significance from control cells, p < 0.001.



To initiate hypertrophy, the cardiomyocytes were allowed to resume spontaneous contraction by reduction of the concentration of KCl in the culture medium from 50 mM to 5 mM. Within 2 h of the medium change, the cardiomyocytes were contracting, and, after 3 days, the contracting cardiomyocytes had accumulated 39% more protein than control, contraction-arrested cells (Fig. 1A). The increases in protein content of the cells occurred in the absence of changes in DNA content indicating that the growth was due to hypertrophy rather than hyperplasia. These results are in good agreement with those reported previously(8, 9) .

In order to characterize the rates of ribosome biogenesis in our cultures, we used nuclear run-on analysis to measure the rate of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) transcription in contractile-arrested and spontaneously contracting neonatal cardiomyocytes. Results presented in Fig. 1B demonstrate that the rates of rDNA transcription in nuclei derived from spontaneously contracting neonatal cardiomyocytes were greater than those observed in nuclei obtained from time matched contractile-arrested cardiomyocytes. Significant increases in the rates of rRNA synthesis were observed within 12 h following initiation of contraction (159% ± 13) and reached maximal levels within 24-48 h (200% ± 21, Fig. 1B). These results confirm previous studies (8, 9, 12) indicating that contraction-induced hypertrophy of neonatal cardiomyocytes is associated with significant increases in the rate of synthesis of rRNA as the result of accelerated rates of transcription of the 45 S preribosomal DNA.

Analysis of the Cellular Content and Activity of RNA Polymerase I and UBF in Hypertrophic Cardiomyocytes

As an initial step in characterizing the regulation of rDNA transcription in neonatal cardiomyocytes, we measured the relative activity and content of RNA polymerase I and UBF in control and hypertrophic cardiomyocytes.

The relative enzymatic activity of total solubilized RNA polymerase I (as determined by its ability to initiate nonspecific transcription on calf thymus DNA) was determined in F3 extracts obtained from arrested and spontaneously contacting neonatal cardiomyocytes as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' The activity of RNA polymerase I extracted from cardiomyocytes that had been contracting for 24 h was not significantly different from that extracted from contraction-arrested cells (106% ± 3.8, n = 3). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in the total polymerase (106% ± 5.8) or polymerase II (103% ± 16) activities in contracting cells with respect to contraction-arrested cells. Western analyses, using antibodies raised to the beta` subunit of RNA polymerase I (rPolIbeta`) (13) , indicated that the levels of the beta` subunit of RNA polymerase I were essentially the same in contractile-arrested neonatal cardiomyocytes (Fig. 2A, lanes 1 and 3) and cells growing in response to spontaneous contraction (Fig. 2A, lanes 2 and 4). The results from a number of separate experiments were quantified by laser densitometry and are presented in Fig. 2B.


Figure 2: Western analysis of RNA Polymerase I beta` subunit (rPolIbeta`) protein levels in contraction-arrested and spontaneously contracting neonatal cardiomyocytes. A, total cellular protein was extracted at the times indicated from contraction-arrested, neonatal cardiomyocytes (arrested, lanes 1 and 3) or from spontaneously contracting (Contract., lanes 2 and 4). After SDS-PAGE and Western transfer, rPolIbeta` was detected with rabbit anti-rPolIbeta` antisera and visualized by ECL as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' Equal amounts of protein (25 µg) were loaded per lane. B, the results of 3 or more experiments similar to those presented in A were quantified by laser densitometry and are presented as the average fold increase ± S.D. in rPolIbeta` levels in spontaneously contracting neonatal cardiomyocytes over the level found in control cells. Note, the levels of rPolIbeta` are not significantly different between arrested and contracting cardiomyocytes at any time point examined.



In many cell lines, the cellular content of UBF is proportional to the rate of rDNA transcription(25, 26) . Accordingly, we determined whether the accelerated rates of rDNA transcription observed in spontaneously contracting neonatal cardiomyocytes might also be characterized by changes in the levels of UBF. As shown in Fig. 3A, UBF1 and UBF2 protein levels were significantly greater in rapidly contracting cardiomyocytes than in time-matched contractile-arrested cells. The UBF protein levels were maximal after 12 h of contraction (3.5-4.5-fold) and remained at similar levels for up to 72 h. The increases in UBF protein levels cannot be explained by the general increase in cellular protein observed in response to contraction, because equal amounts of protein were loaded per lane. The results from a number of separate experiments were quantified by laser densitometry and are presented in Fig. 3B.


Figure 3: Western analysis of UBF protein levels and phosphorylation status in contraction-arrested and spontaneously contracting neonatal cardiomyocytes. A, total cellular protein was extracted at the times indicated from contraction-arrested, neonatal cardiomyocytes (arrested, lanes 1, 3, and 5) or from spontaneously contracting (Contract., lanes 2, 4, and 6). After SDS-PAGE and Western transfer, UBF was detected with rabbit anti-UBF antisera and visualized by ECL as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' Equal amounts of protein (25 µg) were loaded per lane. B, the results of 3 or more experiments similar to those presented in A were quantified by laser densitometry and are presented as the average fold increase ± S.D. in UBF levels in spontaneously contracting neonatal cardiomyocytes over the level found in control cells.***,**, and *, significance from control cells, p < 0.001, 0.01, and 0.05. respectively. C, contraction-arrested (lanes 1 and 3) and spontaneously contracting (lanes 2 and 4) neonatal cardiomyocytes were metabolically labeled with [P]orthophosphate as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' After 12 h, the cells were harvested, lysed, and UBF-immunopurified using anti-UBF antisera bound to protein A-agarose beads. Immunopurified UBF was removed from the beads and resolved by SDS-PAGE. The immunoprecipitated UBF (lanes 3 and 4, Ppt.) and the resultant supernatants (lanes 1 and 2, Sup.) were subsequently visualized directly by autoradiography (Autorad.) or Western-blotted and probed with anti-UBF antisera (Western). Each lane contains UBF immunoprecipitated from equivalent numbers of cells (4 times 10^6) per treatment. Lanes 1 and 2 and lanes 3 and 4 of the autoradiogram were exposed for 5 h and 3 days, respectively.



Immunoprecipitation of Phosphorylated UBF from Neonatal Cardiomyocytes

Since the degree of UBF phosphorylation affects its ability to activate transcription in cell-free extracts(22, 23) , we examined whether the phosphorylation status of UBF may differ between contractile-arrested and spontaneously contracting neonatal cardiomyocytes. The results in Fig. 3C demonstrate that a 4-5-fold increase in [P]orthophosphate-labeled UBF was immunoprecipitated from cardiomyocytes which had been contracting for 12 h relative to the radioactivity recovered from an equal number of arrested cardiomyocytes (Fig. 3C, lanes 3 and 4, Autorad.). The increase in UBF phosphorylation was not merely part of a global increase in cellular protein phosphorylation in response to contraction since the total radioactivity of P-labeled proteins in the supernatants of arrested and contracting cardiomyocytes were the same (Fig. 3C, lanes 1 and 2, Autorad.). Western analysis of the same immunoprecipitation samples fractionated on a parallel gel demonstrated a similar 4-5-fold increase in total UBF protein immunoprecipitated from contracting cardiomyocytes relative to contraction-arrested cells (Fig. 3C, lanes 3 and 4, Western). At the same time, UBF protein was not detectable in the supernatants (Fig. 3C, lanes 1 and 2, Western) indicating that the UBF protein had been quantitatively immunoprecipitated from the cell extracts by the anti-UBF antibody. The results from 4 separate experiments revealed that the increase (4.1 ± 0.7-fold) in radioactivity associated with contracting cardiomyocytes was not significantly different from the increased amounts (3.9 ± 0.6-fold) of UBF protein recovered from those cells. These results demonstrate that there was no net change in the specific radioactivity of UBF between contractile-arrested and contracting cardiomyocytes.

Transcriptional Regulation of UBF

The cellular content of UBF can be regulated by alterations in the rate of transcription from the UBF promoter(26) . Accordingly, we performed Northern blots and nuclear run on assays to measure the steady-state levels and the rate of synthesis of UBF mRNA in arrested and contracting cardiomyocytes (Fig. 4).


Figure 4: Contraction induces a sustained increase in UBF mRNA levels and UBF gene transcription in neonatal cardiomyocytes. A, after the times indicated, total RNA was extracted from contraction-arrested (lane 1) or spontaneously contracting (Contract., lanes 2-5) neonatal cardiomyocytes cultured at 4 times 10^6 cells/60-mm plate. Following electrophoresis and transfer to Zeta-Probe membranes, the RNA (30 µg/lane) was hybridized to P-labeled UBF cDNA, and the UBF mRNA transcripts were visualized by autoradiography. B, the results of 3-5 experiments similar to those shown in A were quantified and are expressed as the average fold increase ± S.D. in UBF mRNA levels found in contracting cells over the level found in contraction-arrested cells. ***,**, and * denote significant differences from control cells, p < 0.001, 0.01, and 0.05, respectively. C, neonatal cardiomyocytes, cultured as indicated, were contraction-arrested or allowed to spontaneously contract for 8 h, and nuclei were isolated from 16 times 10^6 cells per time point. Nuclear run-on assays were carried out as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' Radiolabeled transcripts were purified from the reaction mixture and hybridized to DNA probes for beta-tubulin mRNA and UBF mRNA or control pUC19 DNA as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' After stringent washes, the hybrids were visualized by autoradiography. The values are means ± S.D. of 3 separate experiments. *, significant difference from control, p < 0.01.



Within 3 h of the onset of contraction, the amount of UBF mRNA began to rise (Fig. 4A, lane 3). After 12 h of contraction, the UBF mRNA levels were maximal and remained elevated for up to 3 days (Fig. 4B). This temporal pattern of UBF mRNA induction parallels that observed for the elevation in UBF protein in response to contraction. When similar blots were probed for mRNA encoding glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, no significant increases were observed (see Fig. 5A for an example). The kinetics of the increase in UBF mRNA levels indicated that at least part of this response might reflect increased expression of the UBF gene. Indeed, nuclear run-on assays demonstrated that nuclei isolated from cells that had been contracting for 12 h demonstrated a 4.5 ± 0.5-fold (n = 3) greater rate of UBF gene transcription than nuclei isolated from time-matched control cells (Fig. 4C). The specificity of the hybridization was demonstrated by the lack of hybridization of the de novo synthesized transcripts to control pUC19 DNA (Fig. 4C). Under the same conditions, transcription of the beta-tubulin gene was unchanged, indicating that the transactivation of the UBF gene was not merely the result of a global increase in general transcription (Fig. 4C).


Figure 5: Cardiac non-cardiomyocytes do not mediate contraction-induced increases in UBF expression in cardiomyocytes. A, total RNA was isolated from cultures of either normally purified (lanes 1 and 3) or Percoll gradient purified (Perc., lanes 2 and 4) cardiomyocytes that had been either maintained in the arrested state (lanes 1 and 2) or had been allowed to spontaneously contract (Contr., lanes 3 and 4) for 12 h. Following electrophoresis and blotting, the RNA (30 µg/lane) was hybridized to P-labeled UBF cDNA (upper panel) or glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase cDNA (lower panel). B, the results of 3 or more experiments similar to those described in A were quantified and expressed as the average fold increase ± S.D. in UBF mRNA levels found in contracting cells over the level found in contraction-arrested cells. *, significant difference from control cells, p < 0.001. C, after 12 h, total RNA was extracted from contraction-arrested neonatal cardiomyocytes (lane 1), spontaneously contracting neonatal cardiomyocytes treated with vehicle (Contract., lane 23) or spontaneously contracting neonatal cardiomyocytes treated with DuP 753 (DuP 753, 1 µM). Following electrophoresis and Northern blotting, the RNA (30 µg) was hybridized to P-labeled UBF cDNA, and the UBF mRNA transcripts were visualized by autoradiography. The experiment was repeated 3 times, and a representative autoradiogram is shown.



Stimulation of UBF Expression by Contraction Is Not Mediated by Cardiac Non-cardiomyocytes or Angiotensin II

It was most likely that the contraction-induced increases in UBF were due to a direct effect on the cardiomyocytes themselves. However, it was also possible that regulation of UBF expression by contraction may require the permissive action of growth factor(s) produced by the 5-10% contaminating population of cardiac non-cardiomyocytes which include fibroblasts and cells of the vasculature(38) .

To distinguish between these possibilities, we measured the hypertrophic response of contracting cardiomyocytes purified by centrifugation through Percoll gradients(28) . The results presented in Fig. 5demonstrate that when cardiomyocytes purified in this manner were allowed to spontaneously contract, the induction of UBF mRNA (Fig. 5A, lane 3) was not significantly different from that observed in the standard cardiomyocyte preparations (Fig. 5A, lane 4). The results from 3-5 separate experiments were quantified and are presented in Fig. 5B. Thus, the alteration of UBF expression observed following contraction occurred in the hypertrophying cardiomyocyte population and required neither additional cells types nor the permissive action of paracrine growth factors from the cardiac non-cardiomyocytes. Moreover, under the same conditions, the mRNA levels of the ``housekeeping'' gene glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase were not altered in response to contractile activity (Fig. 5A, lanes 1-4, lower panel), further demonstrating that the increase in UBF mRNA following initiation of contraction was not simply part of a nonspecific transcription response.

The physiological parameters of spontaneous contraction have not been defined, but they are likely to include both passive stretch and increased tension. It has been suggested that increased cardiomyocyte growth and some alterations in gene expression induced by passive stretch may be, at least partly, mediated by the autocrine release and action of angiotensin II(39) . Accordingly, the possibility that angiotensin II might mediate the contraction-induced increases in cardiomyocyte growth and UBF expression in the present experiments was considered. The ability of contraction to augment protein accumulation after 48 h was the same in the presence and absence of the specific angiotensin II receptor antagonist, DuP 753 (1 µM), 137% and 135% of control, respectively. DuP 753 also failed to prevent contraction-induced increases in UBF mRNA (Fig. 5C) or protein (results not shown). Similar results were obtained with the alternative angiotensin II antagonist [Sar^1,Ile^8]angiotensin II (1 µM). Both of these antagonists abolished short-term, angiotensin II-mediated increases in MAP kinase activity in contraction-arrested cardiomyocytes, indicating that they were active at the concentrations used (data not shown). Therefore, it is unlikely that the ability of contractile activity to modulate growth and UBF expression requires the permissive action of angiotensin II in our neonatal cardiomyocyte culture system.

The UBF Promoter Contains Elements Responsive to Contraction

Nuclear run-on assays demonstrated that the increased accumulation of UBF mRNA during contraction-induced hypertrophy was due to increased levels of transcription from the UBF gene. These results suggest that the UBF gene must contain cis-acting elements which respond to the signal transduction cascade initiated by contraction. To test this hypothesis, we transfected arrested and contracting cultured neonatal cardiomyocytes with various UBF/CAT constructs and compared the levels of CAT activity expressed (Fig. 6, Table 1). As demonstrated in Fig. 6A, contracting cardiomyocytes transfected with a fragment of the UBF gene extending from -3124 to +93 (pCAT3.2) (+1 being the transcription initiation site) demonstrated a 3-4-fold increase in CAT activity as compared to noncontracting cardiomyocytes. On the other hand, a construct that extended from -665 to +93 (pCAT0.75) did not respond to contraction. These results suggest that the UBF gene contains a cis-acting element that is capable of responding to contraction and that it lies between -3124 and -665. Subsequent experiments with a more extensive set of 5` deletion mutants (Fig. 6B) demonstrated that this element lies between -1189 and -665 of the UBF gene. In addition, these experiments suggest that the region between -2441 and -1189 is capable of repressing the induction of transcription from the UBF gene, as deleting this segment resulted in an amplification of the response to contraction from 3-4-fold to 16-18-fold (compare the responses demonstrated by either pCATUB 3.2 or pCATUB 2.5 to that demonstrated by pCATUB 1.3).




DISCUSSION

Increased ribosome biogenesis is essential to the accumulation of protein during neonatal cardiomyocyte hypertrophy(9, 12, 34, 40) . This process is regulated largely as the result of alterations in the transcriptional rate of the ribosomal RNA genes (rDNA)(12, 40) . However, the molecular signals and pathways by which hypertrophic stimuli effect an increase in the rate of rDNA transcription in these cells are not known. For instance, it is possible that diverse hypertrophic stimuli augment rDNA transcription by activating common regulatory factor(s). Alternatively, they might act through divergent signaling pathways culminating in the activation of rDNA transcription through distinctly different sets of activators.

We have reported previously that the accelerated rDNA transcription associated with norepinephrine-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy was accompanied by increased cellular levels of the rDNA transcription factor UBF(13) . We hypothesized that increased amounts and/or post-translational modification of UBF, i.e. increased UBF activity, might be a common mechanism by which diverse hypertrophic stimuli effect changes in rDNA transcription in cardiomyocytes. In order to address this question, an alternative model of cardiac hypertrophy was examined, one in which the cardiomyocytes were hypertrophying in response to spontaneous contraction(6, 7, 8) . Specifically, we have compared the levels and enzymatic activity of RNA polymerase I and the content of the rDNA transcription factor, UBF, in contraction-arrested and contracting cultured neonatal cardiomyocytes. We have found that concomitant with contraction-induced increases in rDNA transcription, the cardiomyocyte level of UBF also increased in the absence of changes in the amounts or activity of RNA polymerase I. Immunoprecipitation of P-orthophosphorylated UBF demonstrated that the accumulated UBF was phosphorylated and thus transcriptionally active. Northern blots and nuclear run-on assays revealed that the accumulation of UBF was at least partially regulated at the level of transcription of the UBF gene. Further, transient transfection assays demonstrated that the UBF gene contained an element that could direct increased levels of transcription in response to contraction.

Regulation of UBF Content during Hypertrophy

The results presented here and those of our previous studies indicate that both spontaneous contraction and norepinephrine increase rDNA transcription in neonatal cardiomyocytes(11, 12) . However, neither of these stimuli modulates the enzymatic activity or levels of RNA polymerase I in these cells(13) . Thus, at least in response to these two fundamentally different hypertrophic stimuli, alterations in the amount or activity of RNA polymerase I cannot account for the observed changes in rDNA transcription. In direct contrast, both of these hypertrophic stimuli increased the cellular content of the rDNA transcription factor UBF (13) . Moreover, the elevated level of UBF protein was proportional to the increased rates of rDNA transcription observed in response to each hypertrophic stimulus. For example, the maximal increases in UBF protein content and rate of rDNA transcription and total cellular protein content observed in contracting cardiomyocytes was 3.5-4.5-fold and 190-210%, respectively, compared to 2-3-fold and 150-175%, respectively, observed in response to norepinephrine (13) .

UBF can stimulate rDNA transcription in in vitro transcription reactions(10, 11, 18) . In preliminary studies, we have found that the overexpression of UBF1 in primary neonatal cardiomyocyte cultures increases transcription from a co-transfected rDNA promoter in a dose-dependent manner. (^4)When considered together with these findings, our present data strongly implicate changes in the amount of UBF as a common mechanism by which diverse hypertrophic stimuli effect increases in rDNA transcription in neonatal cardiomyocytes.

Transcriptional Regulation of UBF by Contraction

Our observation that the rate of UBF gene transcription and the cellular contents of the UBF mRNA are increased relatively soon following initiation of contraction, and are maintained at these elevated levels, supports the hypothesis that UBF is contributing to the elevated rate of rDNA transcription. However, it is interesting to note that there are temporal differences in the way different hypertrophic stimuli regulate UBF mRNA content. For example, while the levels of UBF protein remained elevated during hypertrophy induced by adrenergic agonists(13) , the elevation in cardiomyocyte UBF mRNA levels was transient. In contrast, spontaneous contraction is associated with a sustained elevation in the cardiomyocyte UBF mRNA levels. Thus, the differences in the transcriptional regulation of UBF by spontaneous contraction and norepinephrine may ultimately account for the quantitative differences in the ability of these two stimuli to increase UBF protein levels and, as a consequence, to trans-activate the rDNA promoter.

Contraction Is a Direct Stimulus for UBF Expression and Increased rDNA Transcription

It has been shown that a number of growth factors, such as basic fibroblast growth factor and transforming growth factor beta or a transforming growth factor beta-like growth factor, are released from the cardiac fibroblasts and that these factors can modulate cardiomyocyte growth and gene expression (41 and reviewed in (42) ). However, in our hands, cardiomyocyte cultures, purified by Percoll gradient centrifugation, exhibited the same response, i.e. the induction of UBF mRNA, as observed in cultures containing a minor contaminating population of cardiac non-cardiomyocytes. Thus, the observed increase in UBF reflects a direct effect of contraction upon the cardiomyocytes and does not require the permissive release of growth factors from the cardiac non-cardiomyocytes. Moreover, our experiments with the angiotensin II antagonists DuP 753 and [Sar^1,Ile^8]angiotensin II would obviate either an autocrine or paracrine role for angiotensin II in the induction of rDNA transcription and hypertrophy associated with contraction. In broader terms, this work is supportive of previous studies both in isolated perfused hearts and cultured cardiomyocytes (3, 6-8, and reviewed in (40) and (43) ) which have implicated a direct role for mechanical stimulation in the regulation of cardiac gene expression and protein synthesis.

Molecular Signals Regulating UBF Gene Expression

Second messengers and molecular signals that have been implicated in the coupling of hypertrophic growth stimuli with increased rDNA transcription and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy include classical and novel protein kinase C isoforms and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade. In an attempt to determine the relevant importance of such pathways to contraction-induced increases in UBF expression and cardiac hypertrophy, we conducted experiments with a number of appropriate kinase inhibitors including staurosporine, H7, and compound 3. However, while such kinase inhibitors did attenuate the contraction-mediated increase in UBF mRNA content and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy (results not shown), we found, as others have reported(14) , that they also significantly inhibited the contractile activity of neonatal cardiomyocytes. Consequently, it was not possible to determine whether the altered regulation of UBF mRNA content was a direct effect of kinase inhibition or merely secondary to the decrease in contraction. Thus, it is unlikely that this approach will lead to the elaboration of the signal transduction pathways that couple contraction to increased UBF content and accelerated rDNA transcription.

An alternative approach to this problem would start with the analysis of the UBF promoter and the determination of the cis-acting elements and trans-acting factors responsible for increased levels of transcription in response to contraction. The UBF gene has been cloned, and the region immediately 5` to the transcription initiation site has been sequenced(37) . (^5)In the studies described here, a UBF promoter/CAT chimeric gene transfected into neonatal cardiomyocytes responded to contraction in a quantitatively similar manner as the endogenous gene. Moreover, we have identified a region between -1189 and -665 relative to the predicted start of transcription of the UBF gene which contains an element(s) that mediates the response to contraction. Further studies using this approach will allow us to define the specific cis-acting elements within this region that regulate contractile-mediated UBF expression and to determine the respective trans-acting factors which bind to those sequences. These studies should put us one step closer to elucidating the signal transduction pathways that link the cascade initiated by contraction with accelerated rDNA transcription during neonatal cardiomyocyte hypertrophy.


FOOTNOTES

*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants HL47638 and GM48991 (to L. I. R.) and an award from the Geisinger Foundation (to L. I. R.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
Supported by a Fellowship of the American Heart Association.

Fellow of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.

**
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 717-271-6662; Fax: 717-271-6701; :lrothblum{at}geisinger.edu.

(^1)
Luyken, J., Hannan, R. D., and Rothblum, L. I., Circ. Res., in press.

(^2)
The abbreviations used are: PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; rPolIbeta`, beta` subunit of RNA polymerase I.

(^3)
J. Luyken, R. D. Hannan, and L. I. Rothblum, manuscript in preparation.

(^4)
R. D. Hannan, V. Y. Stefanovsky, T. Moss, and L. I. Rothblum, submitted for publication.

(^5)
R. D. Hannan, J. Luyken, and L. I. Rothblum, unpublished data.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. David Carey, Joseph Cheung, and Howard Morgan for their helpful comments on this manuscript.


REFERENCES

  1. Vandenburgh, H. H. (1992) Am J. Physiol. 31, R350-R355
  2. Watson, P. A. (1991) FASEB J. 5, 2013-2019 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Cooper, G., IV, Kent, R. L., and Mann, D. L. (1989) J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 21, Suppl. V, 11-30 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Sadoshima, J., Jahn, L., Takahashi, T., Kulik, T. J., and Izumo, S. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 10551-10560 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Komuro, I., Katoh. Y., Kaida, T., Shibazaki, Y., Kurabayashi, M., Hoh, E., Takaku, F., and Yazaki, Y. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 1265-1268 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. McDermott, P., Daood, M., and Klein, I. (1985) Am. J. Physiol. 249, H763-H769
  7. Clark, W. A., Rudnick, S. J., LaPres, J. J., Anderson, L. C., and LaPointe, M. C. (1993) Circ. Res. 73, 1163-1176 [Abstract]
  8. Mc Dermott, P. J., and Morgan, H. E. (1989) Circ. Res. 64, 540-553
  9. McDermott, P. J., Rothblum, L. I., Smith, S. D., and Morgan, H. E. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 18220-18227 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Moss, T., and Stefanovsky, V. Y. (1995) Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol. 50, 25-66 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Paule, M. (1994) Transcription: Mechanisms and Regulation , Raven Press Ltd., New York
  12. McDermott, P. J., Carl, L. L., Conner, K. J., and Allo, S. N. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 4409-4416 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Hannan, R. D., Luyken, J., and Rothblum, L. I. (1995) J. Biol Chem. 270, 8290-8297 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Allo, S. N., McDermott, P. J., Carl, L. L., and Morgan, H. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 22003-22009 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Jacob, S. (1995) Biochem. J. 306, 617-626 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Schnapp, A., Schnapp, G., Erny, B., and Grummt, I. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 6723-6732 [Abstract]
  17. Gokal, P., Cavanaugh, A., and Thompson, E. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 2536-2541 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Smith, S. D., Oriahi, E., Lowe, D., Yang-Yen, H. F., O'Mahony, D., Rose, K., Chen, C., and Rothblum, L. I. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 3105-3116 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Kuhn, A., Voit R., Stefanovsky, V., Evers, R., Bianchi, M., and Grummt, I. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 416-424 [Abstract]
  20. O'Mahony, D. J., and Rothblum, L. I. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 3180-3184 [Abstract]
  21. Smith, S. D., O'Mahony, D. J., Kinsella, B. T., and Rothblum, L. I. (1993) Gene Expression 3, 229-236 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. O'Mahony, D. J., Smith, S. D., Xie, W. Q., and Rothblum, L. I. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 1301-1308 [Abstract]
  23. O'Mahony, D. J., Xie, W. Q., Smith, S. D., Singer, H. A., and Rothblum, L. I. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 35-38 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Voit, R., Schnapp, A., Kuhn, A., Rosenbauer, H., Hirshmann, P., Stunnenberg, H. G., and Grummt, I. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 2211-2218 [Abstract]
  25. Larson, D. E., Xie, W. Q., Glibetic, M., O'Mahony, D., Sells, B. H., and Rothblum, L. I. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 7933-7936 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Glibetic, M., Taylor, L., Larson, D., Hannan, R., Sells, B., and Rothblum, L. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 4209-4212 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Simpson, P. C., McGrath, A., and Savion, S. (1982) Circ. Res. 51, 787-801 [Abstract]
  28. Iwaki, K., Sukhatme, V. P., Shubeita, H. E., and Chien, K. R. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 13809-13817 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Cesarone, C. F., Bolognesi, C., and Santi, L. (1979) Anal. Biochem. 100, 188-197 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Schwartz, L. B., and Roeder, R. G. (1974) J. Biol. Chem. 249, 5898-5906 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Rothblum, L. I., Mamrack, P. M., Kunkle, H. M., Olson, M. O. J., and Busch, H. (1977) Biochemistry 15, 4716-4720
  32. Xie, W. Q., and Rothblum, L. I. (1991) BioTechniques 11, 324-329 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  34. Feinberg, A. P., and Vogelstein, B. (1983) Anal. Biochem. 132, 6-13 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Hannan, R. D., Stennard, F. A., and West, A. K. (1993) J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 1137-1148
  36. Cavanaugh, A. H., Hempel, W. M., Taylor, L. J., Rogalsky, V., Todarov, G., and Rothblum, L. I. (1995) Nature 374, 177-180 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Nishimura, T., Hanada, K., Maeda, Y., Song, C. Z., Hisatake, K., and Muramatsu, M. (1994) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 205, 1217-1225 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Simpson, P. C. (1990) Molecular Biology of the Cardiovascular System , Liss Inc., New York
  39. Sadoshima, J., Xu, Y., Slayter, H. S., and Izumo, S. (1993) Cell 75, 977-984 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Morgan, H. E., Chua, B. H. L., and Russo, L. (1992) The Heart and Cardiovascular System (Fozzard, H. A., Haber, E., Jennings, R. B., Katz, A. M., and Morgan, H. E., eds) pp. 1505-1524, Raven Press, NY
  41. Long, C. S., Hartogesis, W. E., and Simpson, P. C. (1993) J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 25, 915-925 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Parker, T. G., and Schneider, M. D. (1991) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 53, 179-200 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Morgan, H. E., Gordan, E. E., Kira, Y., Chua, B. H. L., Russo, L. A., Peterson, L. J., McDermott, P. J., and Watson, P. (1987) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 49, 533-543 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.