©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Functional LCK Is Required for Optimal CD28-mediated Activation of the TEC Family Tyrosine Kinase EMT/ITK (*)

(Received for publication, September 22, 1995; and in revised form, January 10, 1996)

Spencer Gibson (1) (2) (3)(§) Avery August(§) (4) (5) Donald Branch (6) Bo Dupont (4)(¶) Gordon B. Mills (1) (2) (3)(**)

From the  (1)Molecular Oncology, Division of Medicine, The University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, the (2)Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2C4, (3)Toronto Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2C4, (4)The Immunology Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Institute of Cancer Research, New York, New York 10021, (5)The Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021, and the (6)Canadian Red Cross, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2C4

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

Activation of CD28 on T lymphocytes initiates a cascade of intracellular events, which in concert with activation of the T cell receptor, culminates in production of cytokines and a functional immune response. One of the earliest biochemical changes observed following stimulation of CD28 is tyrosine phosphorylation. We have demonstrated that both the LCK and the EMT/ITK/TSK (EMT) intracellular tyrosine kinases are activated following cross-linking of CD28. Utilizing somatic cell mutants lacking LCK, we demonstrate that functional LCK is required for CD28-induced activation of EMT as evidenced by increased tyrosine phosphorylation and kinase activity. In support of a role for LCK in EMT activation, reconstitution of a LCK-negative Jurkat T cell line by transfection with normal LCK recreates CD28-mediated EMT activation. Furthermore, co-transfection of LCK and EMT into COS-7 cells showed that EMT becomes phosphorylated in the presence of LCK. In addition, increases in EMT association with CD28 were eliminated in a LCK-negative Jurkat cell line, but were restored following transfection of wild type LCK. The data are most compatible with a model in which LCK, either directly or indirectly, initiates EMT activation and association with CD28 following ligation of CD28.


INTRODUCTION

Co-stimulation of T lymphocytes requires the cooperation of two signals delivered by antigen presenting cells: one stimulatory signal derived from interaction of the T cell receptor (TCR) (^1)complex with antigen in the context of the major histocompatibility complex and a second co-stimulatory signal from the ligation of accessory molecules(1) . In the absence of the co-stimulatory signal, T cells fail to undergo clonal expansion and instead ultimately enter an abortive pathway characterized by antigen desensitization, anergy, or programmed cell death(1, 2, 3, 4) . The interaction of CD28 on T lymphocytes with B7.1 (CD80) or B7.2 (CD86) on antigen-presenting cells is the most potent identified co-stimulatory signal. Indeed, cross-linking of CD28 can prevent activation-induced desensitization, anergy, and programmed cell death(4, 5, 6, 7, 8) .

Upon activation of CD28, there is a rapid and immediate increase in tyrosine phosphorylation of a number of specific substrates(8, 9, 10, 11, 12) . However, because CD28 does not contain an intrinsic kinase domain, it must activate intracellular tyrosine kinases. In addition, cross-linking of CD28 leads to the induction of a number of early signaling events, including increases in cytosolic free calcium(7, 8) , activation of RAS(13) , activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (13) , activation of phosphatidylinositol 3`-kinase(14, 15, 16, 17, 18) , activation of JNK kinase (also known as stress-activated kinase) (19) and activation of RAF kinase(20) . Although it is clear that cross-linking of CD28 can induce a number of early signals, the role that activation of these biochemical changes plays in the ability of CD28 to synergize with the TCR to induce a functional T cell response remains unclear. Furthermore, the mechanisms leading to activation of these enzymes by CD28 and in particular the order of activation of each of these enymes is unknown.

We have demonstrated recently that EMT/ITK/TSK (EMT), a TEC family protein tyrosine kinase, becomes activated after CD28 cross-linking, as evidenced by a transient increase in tyrosine phosphorylation and kinase activity. In addition, stimulation of CD28 results in a rapid increase in the association of EMT with CD28(21) . Thus EMT has the potential to play a role in CD28 signal transduction. LCK is also activated after stimulation of CD28, suggesting that this kinase may have a signaling role through CD28 in addition to its dual role downstream of both the TCR and CD4/8(21, 22) .

The TEC family of intracellular kinases currently consists of members that contain SH2 and SH3 SRC homology (SH) domains but lack the negative regulatory tyrosine present at the carboxyl terminus and the myristoylation site found at the amino terminus of SRC family members. Thus the TEC family of tyrosine kinases must be regulated in a different manner from the SRC family of tyrosine kinases. BTK and EMT contain, in addition to the SH2 and SH3 domains, a pleckstrin homology (PH) domain. The exact function of this domain is currently unknown, but it may play a role in the ability of BTK and EMT to associate with other molecules such as protein kinase C(23, 24) . Both BTK and EMT have restricted patterns of expression; BTK is expressed mainly in mast cells and B cells and EMT is expressed primarily in mast cells and T cells(25, 26) . BTK is involved in B cell signal transduction; mutations in BTK have been causally linked to X-linked agammaglobulinemia, a severe human B cell immunodeficiency(27) . In addition, since cross-linking mouse FcRI leads to activation of BTK (28) , this kinase may also play a role in mast cell activation.

Herein, we demonstrate that CD28-mediated EMT activation and EMT association with CD28 is greatly decreased in cells lacking functional LCK. Reconstitution of LCK kinase activity by enforced expression of the normal human LCK reconstituted ligand-induced EMT activation and increased EMT association with CD28, confirming a role for LCK in EMT activation. In addition co-expression of EMT and LCK in COS-7 cells lead to tyrosine phosphorylation of EMT. Thus, EMT appears to be located downstream of LCK in the signaling pathways activated by CD28.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Antibodies

Monoclonal anti-CD28 antibody 9.3 (IgG2a) was a kind gift of J. Ledbetter (Bristol-Myers Squibb Research Institute, Seattle). Anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (4G10, IgG1) was purchased from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. (Lake Placid, NY). The production and specificity of the anti-EMT serum used in these studies was described previously(26) .

Cell Lines

COS-7 cells, the parental human Jurkat leukemic cell line E6.1 and the JCaM1.6 Jurkat clone (which is LCK-negative, (29) ) were from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD). JCaM 1.6 transfected with LCK (JCaM 1.6-LCK) was obtained from Art Weiss (University of California, San Francisco, (40) ). By Western blotting the protein level of LCK in JCaM1.6-LCK was comparable with the parental Jurkat cell line (data not shown) and was not detected in the JCaM1.6 cell line. Similar levels of EMT were present, as assessed by Western blotting, in all the Jurkat T cell lines studied (data not shown). CD28 expression was the same for all Jurkat cell lines studied (data not shown). Both Jurkat E6.1 and JCaM1.6 have been demonstrated to lack functional SYK(30) .

Cell Culture, Stimulation, Transfection, and Lysis

Jurkat cells were cultured and starved as described previously(21, 26) . Anti-CD28 antibodies were added at 1 µg/5 times 10^6 cells at 37 °C as indicated. Rabbit anti-mouse (RAM) antibodies (10 µg/ml) were added 1 min after addition of anti-CD28 antibodies, in order to induce cross-linking. After activation, the cells were pelleted and immediately incubated with lysis buffer (26) for 15 min at 4 °C. COS-7 cells were transfected with plasmids pA1068 (hlck in pMEXneo) and/or pCMVEMTneo (hEMT in pCMVneo) by calcium phosphate precipitation and lysed 2 days later.

Immunoprecipitation and Western Blotting

Cell lysates were centrifuged at 14,000 times g for 15 min at 4 °C. After centrifugation the supernatant was immunoprecipitated and Western-blotted as described previously(21, 26) . The blots were blocked overnight in either 5% bovine serum albumin for the detection of phosphotyrosine residues or 5% non-fat milk for detection of EMT. Anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies (4G10, 1:2500 dilution) or EMT antibodies (1:1000) were added for 1 h. Membranes were washed, incubated with the appropriate secondary antibody, and protein was detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL). Where indicated, the blots were stripped with 1% SDS, reprobed with anti-EMT antibodies (1:1000 dilution), and visualized by ECL.

In Vitro Kinase Assay

Tyrosine kinase activity of EMT was assayed by immunoprecipitation of lysates as described above. The immunoprecipitates were then washed once in kinase wash buffer (150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris, pH 7.2, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1 mM sodium vanadate). The precipitates were then incubated in 45 µl of kinase buffer (10 mM manganese chloride, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.0, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 0.1 mM sodium orthovanadate) containing 5 µCi of [-P]ATP and 5 µg of a peptide (Arg-Arg-Leu-Ile-Glu-Asp-Ala-Glu-Tyr-Ala-Ala-Arg-Gly) (Sigma) derived from the sequence surrounding the SRC tyrosine kinase autophosphorylation site(31) . This mixture was incubated for 15 min at room temperature which was found to be within linear range of the assay. The mixture was then blotted onto phosphocellulose paper and washed six times with phosphoric acid. The amount of -P incorporated was determined by scintillation counting.


RESULTS

Optimal CD28-induced EMT Activation Requires LCK

Activation of CD28 initiates an intracellular kinase cascade that involves the LCK kinase(21, 22) . To test whether LCK expression is required for optimal activation of EMT by CD28, we measured the level of EMT activation, as assessed by tyrosine phosphorylation and kinase activity, after CD28 cross-linking in the JCaM 1.6 Jurkat T cell line that does not express LCK. In contrast to results in the parental Jurkat T cell line, both basal and CD28-induced total tyrosine phosphorylation was markedly decreased in the JCaM 1.6 line in at least three similar experiments (Fig. 1, panels b and d, and data not presented). Strikingly, although CD28-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of EMT was readily detectable in parental Jurkat cells (Fig. 1, panels a and d)(21) , no CD28-induced increase in EMT phosphorylation was detected in JCaM 1.6 cells (Fig. 1, panels b and d). In parallel with the tyrosine phosphorylation data, incubation of JCaM 1.6 with anti-CD28 antibodies did not induce EMT kinase activity (Fig. 2). Furthermore, increased EMT association with CD28 was not detected in the JCaM 1.6 cell line as compared with the parental Jurkat cell line (Fig. 3a).


Figure 1: CD28-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of EMT requires functional LCK. Jurkat T cells were stimulated by cross-linking CD28 with 10 µg/ml anti-CD28 (9.3) antibody and 10 µg/ml RAM for the indicated times. Similar results were observed in the absence of RAM (see (18) and data not presented). The cells were then lysed as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' A, EMT was immunoprecipitated with anti-EMT serum as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' The precipitates were loaded on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel, transferred to Immobilon, and Western-blotted with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (4G10). B, the blot was stripped with 1% SDS and reprobed with anti-EMT antibody. C, total phosphotyrosine-containing proteins were immunoprecipitated with polyclonal anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies prepared in this laboratory, loaded on SDS-PAGE, and blotted with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (4G10). Immunoreactivity was detected by ECL in all cases. Parental Jurkat (panel a), JCaM 1.6 (panel b), and LCK transfected JCaM 1.6 (panel c) were treated similarly; the result shown represents one of three similar experiments. In panel d, data from panels a-d were converted to relative levels by densitometry and normalized to EMT protein levels determined by densitometry. The relative level of tyrosine phosphorylation is presented as the -fold increase over basal levels of EMT tyrosine phosphorylation. box, cell line: Jurkat, stimulation: CD28, readout: EMT Tyr(P); bullet, cell line: JCaM1, stimulation: CD28, readout, EMT Tyr(P); , cell line: JCaM1 LCK, stimulation: CD28, readout: EMT Tyr(P).




Figure 2: Activation-induced increase in EMT tyrosine kinase activity. The relative increase in kinase activity of EMT was determined after stimulation of Jurkat cells as described in the legend to Fig. 1. EMT was immunoprecipitated and kinase activity was determined utilizing the SRC peptide as substrate as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' Kinase activity is presented as -fold increase over that observed in unstimulated cells to allow comparison between experiments. The results represent mean and standard error of the mean of three repeats of three independent experiments. box, cell line: Jurkat, stimulation: CD28, readout: EMT immunoprecipitation kinase; bullet, cell line: Jcam1, stimulation: CD28, readout: EMT immunoprecipitation kinase; , cell line: Jcam1 LCK, stimulation: CD28, readout, EMT immunoprecipitation kinase.




Figure 3: EMT association with CD28 following CD28 activation. EMT association with CD28 was determined by lysing JCaM1.6 cells (a) or JCaM1.6 cells transfected with LCK in Nonidet P-40 lysing buffer after cross-linking CD28 for the indicated time periods (b). CD28 was immunoprecipitated from cell lysates with anti-CD28 (9.3, 10 µg/ml) and RAM (10 µg/ml) and Western-blotted with anti-EMT as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' Activation of the parental Jurkat cell line with anti-CD28 for 5 min provides a positive control for CD28-induced EMT association with CD28. The data represent one of three similar experiments. ipt, immunoprecipitation.



To confirm that the decreased activation of EMT and reduced association of EMT with CD28 in the JCaM 1.6 line was due to a lack of functional LCK, we determined whether the response to CD28 cross-linking was restored in a JCaM 1.6 cell line transfected to express normal human LCK. Previous studies had demonstrated that expression of LCK in JCaM 1.6 restores anti-TCR-mediated signaling and interleukin-2 production (29) . In JCaM 1.6 LCK transfectants, CD28-induced tyrosine phosphorylation, and specifically, tyrosine phosphorylation of EMT induced by cross-linking CD28 was completely restored (Fig. 1, panels c and d). Similarly, anti-CD28 mediated increases in EMT kinase activity were restored in the JCaM 1.6 LCK transfectants (Fig. 2). In addition, the increase in association of EMT with CD28 was restored (Fig. 3b). The ability of transfected LCK to reconstitute CD28-mediated EMT activation confirms that the defect in EMT activation in JCaM 1.6 was indeed a consequence of lack of functional LCK.

Co-transfection of LCK and EMT into COS-7 Cells Leads to EMT Phosphorylation

CD28-mediated EMT activation seems to require functional LCK in Jurkat cells. This suggests that EMT could be a target for tyrosine phosphorylation by LCK. In support of this possibility, both EMT and LCK were transfected in COS-7 cell either alone or together and the extent of EMT phosphorylation determined. As shown in Fig. 4, transfection of vector alone or EMT alone did not result in detectable tyrosine phosphorylation of EMT. However, concurrent transfection of both LCK and EMT in COS-7 cells resulted in tyrosine phosphorylation of a unique 72-kDa band consistent with LCK phosphorylating EMT.


Figure 4: LCK tyrosine phosphorylation of EMT in COS-7 cells. COS-7 cells were transfected with expression vectors encoding EMT/ITK in the presence or absence of LCK as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' Cells were harvested and EMT was immunoprecipitated and separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to Immobilon membrane, which was then probed with anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies (top). The blot was then stripped and reprobed with anti-EMT antibodies (bottom).




DISCUSSION

The data presented are most consistent with a model wherein CD28-induced activation of the LCK tyrosine kinase is proximal in a cascade leading to CD28-induced activation of EMT. In support of this possibility, we have demonstrated that LCK kinase activity is increased following stimulation of CD28 (21, 22) and that LCK can lead to tyrosine phosphorylation of EMT in COS-7 cells (Fig. 4). Whether LCK directly phosphorylates EMT or EMT activation is a consequence of LCK-mediated phosphorylation of an intermediary molecule following CD28 activation is currently unknown. As Jurkat cells express both SRC and FYN(32) , these Src family tyrosine kinases, in contrast to LCK, are either not sufficient for CD28-mediated EMT activation or are not stimulated following CD28 ligation.

Regulation of EMT kinase activity may well be at the level of tyrosine phosphorylation, since tyrosine phosphorylation of EMT and EMT kinase activity demonstrated concurrent changes following cross-linking of CD28 (Fig. 1d and Fig. 2). EMT contains a tyrosine in a conserved internal site which becomes autophosphorylated in Src family tyrosine kinases and likely positively regulates kinase activity(26) . However, kinase assays revealed that EMT is very inefficient at autophosphorylation as compared to Src family tyrosine kinases(21) . Since EMT is inefficient in autophosphorylation (21) and LCK has the ability to induce tyrosine phosphorylation of EMT (Fig. 4), this phosphorylation site in EMT could be a direct target for other kinases such as LCK. Indeed a number of different tyrosine kinases are both positively and negatively regulated by other tyrosine kinases in activation cascades. For example, phosphorylation of the negative regulatory site of SRC family kinases seems to be dependent on the action of CSK family kinases(33, 34) . In turn, a number of different SRC family kinases have been demonstrated to regulate non-SRC family kinases. This is well documented for LYN and SYK in B cells(35) , SRC and FAK in fibroblasts(36) , and FYN or LCK and ZAP70 in T cells(2) . ZAP70 activation is, however, not detectable after CD28 ligation. (^2)Further support for a model in which tyrosine kinases are coordinately regulated in an activation cascade is provided by the demonstration that functional signaling by the platelet-derived growth factor receptor is dependent on the presence of functional SRC family kinases(37) . It is important to note, in terms of potential kinase activation cascades, that the experiments presented herein, although demonstrating that LCK is required for CD28-mediated EMT activation, do not address the question of whether LCK is reciprocally regulated either negatively or positively by EMT.

After CD28 activation, the receptor becomes tyrosine-phosphorylated (15, 18) . Signaling proteins such as phosphatidylinositol 3`-kinase and Grb2 bind to these phosphotyrosine residues through their SH2 domains (14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 38, 39) . As demonstrated previously(21) , EMT binds to CD28 constitutively and after activation the association is up-regulated presumably by SH2 domain interactions. This increase in association was greatly reduced in the JCaM 1.6 cell line and restored in the JCaM 1.6 cell line transfected with LCK. This suggests that functional LCK is required for CD28 cross-linking induced increases in EMT association with CD28. This may be a consequence of LCK either directly or indirectly tyrosine phosphorylating CD28. Recent results, using transfection into Spodoptera cells, supports LCK as the primary mediator of CD28 phosphorylation(38) . Furthermore, EMT, phosphatidylinositol 3`-kinase, and GRB2 association with CD28 in transfected Spodoptera cells required co-expression of LCK (38) .

Although the PH domain of both BTK and EMT associate with protein kinase C isoymes(24) , limited data are present to date on the interactions between TEC family kinases and other tyrosine kinases. Although EMT and BTK appear to associate with SRC family kinases (including LCK and FYN) in the yeast two-hybrid system and when expressed as bacterial fusion proteins(40, 41, 42) , it has been difficult to demonstrate interactions in intact cells(40, 41, 42) . Indeed, under conditions (using Nonidet P-40 buffers) in which we can readily demonstrate association of EMT with CD28 (Fig. 3, (21) ), we have been unable to demonstrate association of EMT with LCK, FYN, SRC, or TTK (all of which are expressed by Jurkat T cells; 10, 32, 43, 44) as indicated by co-immunoprecipitation (data not shown).

In summary, we have demonstrated that the ability of CD28 to optimally activate EMT is dependent on the presence of functional LCK. The data are most compatible with a model of CD28 signaling in which activated LCK mediates phosphorylation and activation of EMT and mediates EMT association with CD28. Thus EMT activation seems to be located downstream of LCK in a kinase cascade stimulated by CD28.


FOOTNOTES

*
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
These authors contributed equally to the studies.

Supported by National Institutes of Health NCI Grants CA08748 and CA22507.

**
Supported by the Medical Research Council of Canada. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Chairman, Molecular Oncology, Box 92, Division of Medicine, The University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030. Tel.: 713-792-7770; Fax: 713-794-1807.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: TCR, T cell receptor; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

(^2)
A. August and B. Dupont, unpublished observation.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. A. Weiss for the kind gift of cell lines that made these experiments possible and Dr. J. Ledbetter for the gift of anti-CD28 antibody (9.3) along with his expert advice.


REFERENCES

  1. Janeway, C., and Bottomly, K. (1994) Cell 76, 275-285 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Schwartz, R. (1992) Cell 71, 1065-1068 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Weiss, A., and Littman, D. (1994) Cell 76, 263-274 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Harding, F., McArther, J., Gross, J., Raulet, D., and Allison, J. (1992) Nature 356, 607-609 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Shi., Y., Radvanyi, L., Shaw, P., Miller, R., and Mills, G. B. (1995) J. Immunol. 155, 1829-1837 [Abstract]
  6. Shahinian, A., Pfeffer, K., Lee, K., Kundig, T., Kishihara, K., Wakeham, A., Kawai, K., Ohashi, P., Thompson, C., and Mak, T. (1993) Science 261, 609-612 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. June, C., Ledbetter, J., Linsley, P., and Thompson, C. (1990) Immunol. Today 11, 211-216 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Linsley, P., and Ledbetter, J. (1993) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 11, 191-212 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Freeman, G., Gribben, J., Boussiotis, V., Ng, J., Restiva, V., Jr., Lombard, L., Gray, G., and Nadler, L. (1993) Science 262, 909-911 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Mustelin, T., and Burn, P. (1993) Trends Biochem. Sci. 18, 215-220 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Lu, Y., Granelli-Piperno, A., Bjorndahl, J. M., Phillips, C. A., and Trevillyan, J. M. (1992) J. Immunol. 149, 24-29 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Vandenberghe, P., Freeman, G. J., Nadler, L. M., Fletcher, M. C., Kamoun, M., Turka, L. A., Ledbetter, J. A., Thompson, C. B., and June, C. H. (1992) J. Exp. Med. 175, 951-960 [Abstract]
  13. Nunes, J. A., Collette, Y., Truneh, A., Olive, D., and Cantrell, D. (1994) J. Exp. Med. 180, 1067-1076 [Abstract]
  14. Truitt, K., Hicks, C., and Imboden, J. (1994) J. Exp. Med. 179, 1071-1076 [Abstract]
  15. August, A., and Dupont, B. (1994) Int. Immunol. 6, 769-774 [Abstract]
  16. Prasad, K. V., Cai, Y. C., Raab, M., Duckworth, B., Cantley, L., Schoelson, S. E., and Rudd, C. E. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 2834-2838 [Abstract]
  17. Stein, P. H., Fraser, J. D., and Weiss, A. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 3392-3402 [Abstract]
  18. Pages, F., Ragueneau, M., Rottapel, R., Truneh, A., Nunes, J., Imbert, J., and Olive, D. (1994) Nature 369, 327-329 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Su, B., Jacinto, E., Hibi, M., Kallunki, T., Karin, M., and Ben-Neriah, Y. (1994) Cell 77, 727-736 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Siegel, J. N., June, C. H., Yamada, H., Rapp, U. R., and Samelson, L. R. (1993) J. Immunol. 151, 4116-4127 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. August, A., Gibson, S., Kawakami, Y., Kawakami, T., Mills, G. B., and Dupont, B. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 9347-9351 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. August, A., and Dupont, B. (1994) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 199, 1466-1473 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Yao, L., Kawakami, Y., and Kawakami, T. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 9175-9179 [Abstract]
  24. Kawakami, Y., Yao, L., Tashiro, M., Gibson, S., Mills, G. B., and Kawakami, T. (1995) J. Immunol. 155, 3556-3562 [Abstract]
  25. Yamada, N., Kawakami, Y., Kimura, H., Fukamachi, H., Baier, G., Altman, A., Kato, T., Inagaki, Y., and Kawakami, T. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 192, 231-240 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Gibson, S., Leung, B., Squires, J., Hill, M., Arima, N., Goss, P., Hogg, D., and Mills, G. B. (1993) Blood 82, 1561-1572 [Abstract]
  27. Tsukada, S., Saffran, D., Rawlings, D., Parolini, O., Allen, R. C., Klisak, I., Sparkes, R., Kubagawa, H., Mohandas, T., Quan, S., Belmont, J., Cooper, M., Conley, M., and Witte, O. (1993) Cell 72, 279-290 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Kawakami, Y., Yao, L., Miura, T., Tsukada, S., Witte, O., and Kawakami, T. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 5108-5113 [Abstract]
  29. Straus, D., and Weiss, A. (1992) Cell 70, 585-593 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Fargnol, J., Burkhardt, A. L., Laverty, M., Kut, S., van Oers, N., Weiss, A., and Bolen, J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 26533-26537 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Piket, L., Eakes, A., and Krebs, E. G. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 3782-3789 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Branch, D. R., and Mills, G. B. (1995) J. Immunol. 154, 3678-3685 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Chow, L., Fournel, M., Davidson, D., and Veillette, A. (1993) Nature 365, 156-160 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Hurley, T., Hyman, R., and Sefton, B. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 1651-1656 [Abstract]
  35. Kurosaki, T., Takata, M., Yamansahi, Y., Inazu, T., Taniguchi, T., Yamamoto, T., and Yamamura, H. (1994) J. Exp. Med. 179, 1725-1729 [Abstract]
  36. Schlaepfer, D. D., Hanks, S. K., Hunter, T., and van der Geer, P. (1994) Nature 372, 786-791 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Twamley-Stein, G. M., Pepperkok, R., Ansorge, W., and Courtneidge, S. A. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 7696-7700 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Raab, M., Cai, Y. C., Bunnell, S., Heyeck, S., Berg, L., and Rudd, C. E. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 8891-8895 [Abstract]
  39. Schneider, H., Cai, Y. C., Prasad, K. V. S., Shoelson, S. E., and Rudd, C. E. (1995) Eur. J. Immunol. 25, 1044-105 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Cheng, G., Ye, Z., and Baltimore, D. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 8152-8155 [Abstract]
  41. Alexandropoulos, K., Cheng, G., and Baltimore, D. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 3110-3114 [Abstract]
  42. Yang, W., Malek, S., and Desiderio, S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 20832-20840 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Schmandt, R., Hill, M., Amendola, A., Mills, G. B., and Hogg, D. (1994) J. Immunol. 152, 96-105 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Mills, G. B., Schmandt, R., McGill, M., Amendola, A., Hill, M., Jacobs, K., May, C., Rodricks, A., Campbell, S., and Hogg, D. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 16000-16006 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.