©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Transphosphorylation of the Neurotrophin Trk Receptors (*)

(Received for publication, April 26, 1995; and in revised form, November 8, 1995)

Marco Canossa (§) Giorgio Rovelli (¶) Eric M. Shooter (**)

From the Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5401

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

The potential for the activation of one Trk receptor by ligand binding to another Trk receptor was explored by determining if transphosphorylation on tyrosine residues can occur between receptors. For most of these experiments, functional chimeric receptors were used that contained the extracellular domain of the human type 2 tumor necrosis factor receptor and the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of rat TrkA, TrkB, or TrkC and that, when activated by the tumor necrosis factor, mediated the nerve growth factor-like biological activities in PC12 cells. Cotransfection experiments in COS-7 cells and fibroblasts showed that despite the presence of different extracellular regions, intermolecular transphosphorylation of homologous cytoplasmic domains occurred between TrkA or TrkB and their cognate chimeras. Heterologous transphosphorylation between TrkB and TrkC kinase domains was also observed when one partner was a chimeric receptor; however, TrkA did not transphosphorylate the TrkB or TrkC kinase domains of chimeric receptors or act as a transphosphorylation substrate for these two receptors. The failure of TrkA to take part in transphosphorylation reactions with TrkB and TrkC was confirmed using the natural receptors. Trk receptor transphosphorylation occurs in the two non-neuronal cell types, but TrkA is excluded from these reactions.


INTRODUCTION

The nerve growth factor (NGF) (^1)is a prototype for a structurally related family of neurotrophic factors, the neurotrophins. Three other members of this gene family have been identified, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), neurotrophin-3 (NT-3), and neurotrophin-4/5 (reviewed in (1, 2, 3) ). The neurotrophins share 50% amino acid homology, but they exhibit characteristic patterns of activity. For instance, NGF, BDNF, and NT-3 can support the survival of embryonic sensory dorsal root ganglial neurons, but only NGF can effectively support sympathetic neurons (4, 5) from undergoing programed cell death. Conversely, embryonic placode-derived sensory neurons are sustained by both BDNF and NT-3, but not by NGF(6, 7, 8) . This selectivity is believed to depend on the presence of specific cell-surface receptors with tyrosine kinase activity, known as Trk receptors. A family of three related receptors, TrkA, TrkB, and TrkC, has been characterized. In neurons, NGF, BDNF, and NT-3 are the preferred ligands for TrkA, TrkB, and TrkC, respectively, while all the neurotrophins bind to a common receptor, designated p75 (where NGFR is NGF receptor) (reviewed in (1, 2, 3) ).

The ligand-induced dimerization of TrkA tyrosine kinase receptors leads to activation of the tyrosine kinase(9) . Receptor phosphorylation occurs by a dimerization mechanism whereby the two receptor molecules representing the dimer phosphorylate each other(10) . It is known that the presence of homologous intra- or extracellular domains is sufficient to mediate transphosphorylation between some heterologous receptors(11, 12, 13) , while intermolecular transphosphorylation can also occur between two different but related receptors(14, 15) . Furthermore, the transphosphorylation involving an inactive tyrosine kinase receptor can lead to partial restoration of the functional internalization of this receptor (12) or to amplification of the response by an active receptor(12, 16) .

Dose-response survival experiments with the various neurotrophins suggest that some neurons express more than one type of Trk. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that subsets of dorsal root ganglial neurons coexpress TrkB with either TrkA or TrkC, suggesting that the neurotrophin activity can overlap in the same cell population (17) . The colocalization of TrkA, TrkB, or TrkC receptor mRNA has also recently been reported in primary sensory neurons(18) . It was of interest to determine if the homologous kinase domains of the various Trk receptors represent compatible substrates for heterologous transphosphorylation, permitting one neurotrophin to activate more than one Trk receptor. For this purpose chimeric, TNFR2-Trk receptors, which differ in mobility from the corresponding Trk receptors, have been used. Accordingly, active or inactive Trk receptors were coexpressed in COS-7 cells and fibroblasts with inactive or active chimeric TNFR2-Trk receptors, respectively, and the effects of one or more of the neurotrophins on receptor phosphorylation were determined. Intermolecular transphosphorylation occurred between homologous Trk receptors in these cells, while a restricted TrkB/TrkC heterologous transphosphorylation was observed.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Construction of Chimeric Receptors

Two sets of chimeric receptors between human TNFR2 (a gift of Werner Lesslauer and Hansruedi Loetscher, Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland) and rat TrkB and TrkC (gifts of George Yancopoulos, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, NY) were constructed. The cDNA coding regions of rat TrkA, TrkB, and TrkC and human TNFR2 receptors were subcloned into pRc/CMV and pCDM8 mammalian expression vectors (Invitrogen). Using these as substrate, a two-step polymerase chain reaction (PCR) strategy was employed to build chimeric receptors between the extracellular domain of human TNFR2 and the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of rat TrkB and TrkC (TB and TC, respectively). Mutants in which the transmembrane domain of TrkB or TrkC was replaced by the transmembrane region of TNFR2 (TB-TM and TC-TM, respectively) or lacking the last 15 amino acid residues of the carboxyl-terminal region of TrkB or TrkC (TB-Delta and TC-Delta, respectively) were constructed. Kinase-negative receptor mutants (TrkA-K, TB-K, and TC-K) that carry an alanine instead of a lysine in the ATP-binding domain were made by PCR overlapping extension mutagenesis using full-length or chimeric receptors as substrate. The PCRs were performed as described previously (19) using specific oligonucleotides (PCR-mate, Applied Biosystems Inc.) complementary to the first 17-mer and the last 17-mer of each amplified fragment. We have synthesized oligonucleotides complementary to the following: to the first 17-mer including the start codon (ATG) of human TNFR2, 5`-ATGGCGCCCGTCGCCGT-3` (primer 1); to the last 17-mer of the extracellular domain of human TNFR2 joined with the first 17-mer of the transmembrane domains of rat TrkB and TrkC, 5`-AAGGGAGCACTGGCGAC/CATCTCTCGGTCTATGC-3` (primer 2) and 5`-AAGGGAGCACTGGCGAC/TTTGGGGTGTCCATAGC-3` (primer 3), respectively (slashes divide the oligonucleotide sequences complementary to the TNFR2 and Trk receptors); to the last 17-mer of the transmembrane domain of human TNFR2 and the first 17-mer of the cytoplasmic domains of rat TrkA, TrkB, and TrkC, 5`-TCATCATGACCCAGGTG/AACAAATGTGGACAGAG-3` (primer 4), 5`-TCATCATGACCCAGGTG/AAGTTGGCGAGACATTC-3` (primer 5), and 5`- TCATCATGACCCAGGTG/AACAAGTACGGTCGACG-3` (primer 6); to the last 17-mer of the carboxyl-terminal regions of rat TrkA, TrkB, and TrkC including the stop codon ATC, 3`-ACCTGCAAGACCCGATC-5` (primer 7), 3`-ACCTGTAAGGAACCGATC-5` (primer 8), and 3`-ACCTGTAGGATCCGATC-5` (primer 9), respectively; to the last 17-mer of the putative kinase domains (the stop codon motif was added to interrupt the protein synthesis) of TrkB and TrkC, 3`-TGGTGTTGAGGAAAATC-5` (primer 10) and 3`-TCATGTTTTAGGAGATC-5` (primer 11), respectively; and to the 17-mer upstream and downstream of the lysine codon changed into an alanine codon in the TrkA, TrkB, and TrkC cytoplasmic domains, 5`-GTAGCTGGTGGCTGTCGCGGCACTGAAGGGAGACA-3` (primer 12), 5`-AGATCCTGGTGGCCGTGGCGACGCTGGAAGGACGCCAG-3` (primer 13), and 5`-AGATGCTTGGTGGCAGGTGCGGCCCTGAAGGATCCCAC-3` (primer 14), respectively. Oligonucleotides complementary to primers 4-6 and 12-14 were generated in order to amplify both DNA chains of the substrates. Every single fragment was generated separately by a first PCR, and then each purified fragment were reamplified and joined together. The resulting cDNAs of the TB and TC constructs were subcloned into plasmid pCRTAII (Invitrogen) and sequenced. The mutations were introduced into TrkA, TB, or TC prototypes using appropriate restriction enzymes in order to minimize the amount of DNA to be verified by sequence analysis.

Cell Culture

COS-7 cells (20) and NIH-3T3 fibroblasts were grown in DMEM (Life Technologies, Inc.) containing 5% horse serum and 5% bovine calf serum at 37 °C and 5% CO(2). Rat pheochromocytoma PC12 cells (21) were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 5% bovine calf serum and 5% horse serum and incubated at 37 °C and 12% CO(2).

Protein Expression and Tyrosine Phosphorylation in COS-7 Cells and NIH-3T3 Fibroblasts

Transfection of the chimeras in COS-7 cells was carried out by the DEAE-dextran procedure(22) . Since in cotransfection experiments the protein expression level between Trk receptors and the chimeras was not correlated with the amount of transfected plasmid DNA, we performed the cotransfection using 2 µg of cDNA plasmid expressing chimeric receptors and 8 µg of cDNA plasmid expressing Trk receptors. The 1:4 ratio of the cotransfected plasmid was found to express comparable amounts of protein using the same expression vector, pCDM8. The day before the transfection, 10^6 cells were plated in 10-cm dishes; 48 h after the transfection, cells were washed once and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with serum-free DMEM before stimulation for 5 min with a 50 ng/ml concentration of the appropriate ligand, NGF (Bioscience, Inc.), BDNF, NT-3 (a gift of George Yancopoulos), or TNF (a gift of Werner Lesslauer and Hansruedi Loetscher). Lysed cells, solubilized in a volume of 500 µl of radioimmune precipitation assay buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% deoxycholic acid, and 0.1% SDS), 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.1 mM benzamidine, 0.05 mM 1,10-phenanthroline protease inhibitor, and 1 mM sodium orthovanadate phosphatase inhibitor, were immunoprecipitated for 12 h on ice with the appropriate antibody. A pan-Trk antiserum (a gift of David Kaplan, Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, Frederick, MD) that recognizes the carboxyl-terminal regions of both Trk and chimeric receptors or an antibody that recognizes specifically TrkA (a gift of Stuart C. Feinstein, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA) was used in cotransfection experiments. Since the pan-Trk antiserum cannot recognize the carboxyl terminus-deleted chimeric receptors, the utr-4 monoclonal antibody (a gift of Werner Lesslauer and Hansruedi Loetscher), which recognizes TNFR2 (anti-TNFR2), was used to immunoprecipitate this set of chimeras in COS-7 cells. The immunocomplexes were precipitated by adding 50 µl of a suspension of goat anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse IgG-agarose (Sigma). After three washes (with radioimmune precipitation assay buffer), each sample was boiled for 5 min in 50 µl of a reducing sample buffer. Proteins, separated on an 8% polyacrylamide reducing gel, were transferred to nitrocellulose (Schleicher & Schuell). For immunoblot analysis, filters were preincubated for 1 h with 5% milk protein solution in TBST (20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.02% Tween 20); incubated for 3 h with anti-pTyr antibody (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.), pan-Trk antibody, or anti-TNFR2 antibody; washed three times in TBST; and incubated for 1 h with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit antibody. Immunoblots were developed with the ECL kit system (Amersham Corp.) and stripped in 20 ml of strip buffer (62.5 mM Tris, pH 6.8, 100 mM beta-mercaptoethanol, and 2% SDS) at 50 °C for further reprobing.

NIH-3T3 fibroblasts expressing TrkB receptors (a gift of Hua Zhou, Stanford University) were transiently transfected using LipofectAMINE (Life Technologies, Inc.) strategy, with 6 mg of an expression vector coding for TA, TB, or TC receptors in three different experiments. After BDNF treatment, the receptors were immunoprecipitated from the cell lysate using the pan-Trk antiserum. The phosphotyrosine content was determined by Western blotting as reported for the COS-7 cell protocols.

PC12 Electroporation and Neurite Outgrowth

Electroporation was performed essentially as described by Squinto et al.(23) . The resulting transfected cells were plated in a 15-cm dish for 24 h at 37 °C. Using 1.5 mM EDTA in phosphate-buffered saline, transfected cells were plated at a density of 10^4 cells in 0.5 ml of medium/24-well plate or 1.5 times 10^5 cells in 2.5 ml of medium in 35-mm plastic dishes. 48 h after electroporation, the cells were treated with TNF or NGF, and dose-response curves were performed using the follow concentrations: 0.1, 1, 2.5, 5, 10, 25, and 40 ng/ml. The number of cells bearing neurites was determined after 48 h; only cells presenting neurites of at least two-cell diameter were scored.

Cell Survival Assay

Cytosine beta-D-arabinofuranoside/DMEM (serum-free DMEM with 1 µM cytosine beta-D-arabinofuranoside) was used for the incubation of the electroporated PC12 cells with chimeric molecules. Transfected PC12 cells were plated in 96-well plates at a density of 1.5 times 10^4 cells/well and incubated for 3 days with cytosine beta-D-arabinofuranoside/DMEM and 50 ng/ml either TNF or NGF. Viable cells were stained by adding 10 µl of MTT (Promega) directly into the culture medium and incubating for 4 h at 37 °C; the dye was solubilized for absorbance measurements at 560 nm.


RESULTS

Expression and Autophosphorylation of Chimeric Receptors

Chimeric receptors consisting of the extracellular domain of human TNFR2 and the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of TrkB and TrkC were made as described previously (19) and were designated as TB and TC, respectively. Using TB and TC (Fig. 1A and 2A) as templates, three classes of mutants were made. In the first, the transmembrane domain of TrkB or TrkC was substituted with the corresponding region of TNFR2 (designated TB-TM and TC-TM, respectively). In the second, a lysine residue essential for the tyrosine kinase activity of TrkB or TrkC located in the conserved motif of the ATP-binding domain was mutated to an alanine (designated TB-K and TC-K, respectively). In the third, the last 15 C-terminal amino acids were deleted (designated TB-Delta and TC-Delta, respectively). The chimeras were cloned into the expression vector pCDM8(26) , and the synthesis of the proteins was assayed by expression in COS-7 cells. The ratios of the plasmids used in the cotransfection were varied to achieve a similar level of expression of the two receptors in these (Fig. 1B and Fig. 2B) and other experiments. Transfected cells were lysed, and the receptors were immunoprecipitated using a monoclonal antibody directed against the extracellular domain of TNFR2 (anti-TNFR2)(27) . All the chimeric receptors were expressed and migrated on SDS-PAGE as a doublet with an apparent molecular mass of 65-70 kDa (Fig. 1B and 2B). Although there was variability in the proportion of the two receptor bands when expressed in COS-7 cells, this did not affect the interpretation of the data. The appearance of two bands may result from incomplete processing of the receptors(28) ; for the Trk receptors, this could also result from differences in glycosylation.


Figure 1: Schematic representation, protein expression, and tyrosine phosphorylation of the TB set of chimeric molecules. A, graphic representation of the TB set of chimeras. The extracellular domains of the human TNFR2 receptors are shown as black boxes; rat TrkB kinase domains are represented by white boxes. The extracellular domain of TNFR2 and the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of TrkB represent the prototypic molecule designated as TB (lanes 1 and 2). The transmembrane domain of TNFR2 is represented as an extension of the extracellular region (black box) into the cell membrane (TB-TM) (lanes 3 and 4). The lysine-mutated construct is indicated with a K (TB-K) (lanes 5 and 6). The carboxyl-terminal deletion of the last 15 amino acid residues is represented by the missing vertical bar under the kinase domain (TB-Delta) (lanes 7 and 8). B, protein expression of the TB set of chimeras. Chimeric molecules were transiently expressed in COS-7 cells; lysed cells were immunoprecipitated using anti-TNFR2 and resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on 8% acrylamide gels. The blot was electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose, probed with anti-TNFR2, and developed by the ECL detection system. C, autophosphorylation of the TB set of chimeras. Transfected COS-7 cells were treated for 5 min with (lanes 1, 3, 5, and 7) or without (lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8) 50 ng/ml human TNF, and the phosphotyrosine contents were analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-pTyr.




Figure 2: Schematic representation, protein expression, and tyrosine phosphorylation of the TC set of chimeras. Graphic representation, protein expression, and autophosphorylation activity were determined as described for the TB set of chimeras in the legend of Fig. 1.



Receptors were evaluated for function by measuring the TNF-dependent phosphorylation of the tyrosine kinase domains. The TNF incubation time was optimized to result in maximal autophosphorylation of the chimeras (data not shown). The TB and TC chimeras showed a TNF-dependent increase in phosphotyrosine content of both bands of the doublet, with probably a greater relative increase for the upper band (Fig. 1C and Fig. 2C, lane 1). In the absence of ligand, a background of phosphorylation was detected in both TB and TC chimeras (Fig. 1C and Fig. 2C, lane 2) that was comparable to the phosphorylation observed by expressing wild-type TrkB and TrkC in COS-7 cells (see Fig. 4, A-C, lanes 4 and 6). These results indicate that the TNFR2 extracellular ligand-binding site is able to transduce the enzymatic activation of the TrkB and TrkC kinase domains, as it was with TrkA(19) . TNF was unable to induce autophosphorylation of the kinase-deficient molecules TB-K and TC-K, indicating that the phosphorylation activity of TB and TC is a function of the TNF-mediated activation of their tyrosine kinase domains. As reported for the chimeric molecule between the extracellular domain of the epidermal growth factor and the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of TrkA (EGF-TrkA)(28) , the C-terminal deletions (TB-Delta and TC-Delta) prevented receptor autophosphorylation, confirming that this region is important for tyrosine kinase activity. Surprisingly, the TB-TM and TC-TM chimeras were also inactive, indicating that the transmembrane domain of TNFR2 cannot functionally replace this domain in the Trk receptors.


Figure 4: Tyrosine transphosphorylation of cotransfected Trk receptors and kinase-deficient chimeric receptors in COS-7 cells. A, COS-7 cells were cotransfected with the kinase-deficient chimeric receptor TA-K and TrkA (lanes 2 and 3), TrkB (lanes 4 and 5), and TrkC (lanes 6 and 7). Cotransfection of TA-K and the vector pCDM8 is shown in lane 1. Transfected cells were treated for 5 min with NGF (lane 3), BDNF (lane 5), and NT-3 (lane 7) at a concentration of 50 ng/ml. The receptors were immunoprecipitated with a pan-Trk antibody that recognizes the carboxyl-terminal regions of all Trk and chimeric receptors and separated on 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and the phosphotyrosine content was determined by immunoblotting using anti-pTyr. B, COS-7 cells were cotransfected with the kinase-deficient chimeric receptor TB-K and TrkA (lanes 2 and 3), TrkB (lanes 4 and 5), and TrkC (lanes 6 and 7). Cotransfection of TB-K and the vector pCDM8 is shown in lane 1. The neurotrophin-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation assays was carried out as described in the legend of Fig. 1. C, COS-7 cells were cotransfected with the kinase-deficient chimeric receptor TC-K and TrkA (lanes 2 and 3), TrkB (lanes 4 and 5), and TrkC (lanes 6 and 7). Cotransfection of TC-K and the vector pCDM8 is shown in lane 1. The neurotrophin-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation assays were carried out as described in the legend of Fig. 1C. Arrowheads indicate the TrkA, TrkB, and TrkC receptors (upper) and the inactive chimeric TA-K, TB-K, and TC-K receptors (lower). Molecular mass markers (in kilodaltons) are indicated. Stripped blots developed using pan-Trk antibody showed comparable expression of the receptor proteins.



For experiments to be described later, we also constructed an inactive TrkA carrying a single mutation in the kinase domain (designated TrkA-K) (see Fig. 5). As with the mutants described above, TrkA-K did not show any ligand-mediated autophosphorylation when expressed in COS-7 cells (data not shown). The construction of the remaining chimeric receptors, consisting of the extracellular domain of TNFR2 and the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of TrkA (designated TA) (see Fig. 5) or the corresponding construct with a kinase-deficient domain (designated TA-K) (see Fig. 4), was described earlier(19) .


Figure 5: Tyrosine transphosphorylation of cotransfected kinase-deficient TrkA-K and the chimeric TA, TB, and TC receptors in COS-7 cells. COS-7 cells were cotransfected with inactive TrkA (TrkA-K) and the pCDM8 vector (lane 1) or the chimeric receptors TA (lanes 2 and 3), TB (lanes 4 and 5), and TC (lanes 6 and 7). Transfected cells were treated with (lanes 3, 5, and 7) or without (lanes 2, 4, and 6) TNF (50 ng/ml) for 5 min, and the phosphotyrosine content was determined as described in the legend of Fig. 1C. Arrowheads indicate the migration of TrkA-K (upper) and the chimeric TA, TB, and TC receptors (lower). Stripped blots developed with pan-Trk antibody showed comparable protein expression of the cotransfected receptors.



Characterization of Biological Activity of Chimeras

PC12 cells express TrkA and p75 receptors and respond to NGF by acquiring a sympathetic neuron-like phenotype and surviving in the absence of serum. PC12 cells expressing ectopic TrkB or TrkC receptors show a similar response to BDNF and NT-3, respectively(23, 29, 30) . Since PC12 cells treated with human TNF do not show any apparent biological response(19) , we used PC12 cells as a model system to characterize the biological activity of the chimeras. PC12 cells expressing the TB or TC chimera showed TNF-induced neurite outgrowth that was maximal after 2 days (Fig. 3A). An IC of 2.5 ng/ml TNF for both TB and TC transfectants was observed in the presence or absence of serum. This result is similar to the IC for the TA chimera activated by TNF(19) .


Figure 3: Biological activity of the TB and TC sets of chimeras in PC12 cells. A, neurite outgrowth assay. PC12 cells transfected with both sets of chimeras were incubated with increasing concentrations of TNF (0.1, 1, 2.5, 5, 10, 25, and 40 ng/ml). After 48 h, cells presenting neurites longer than two-cell diameter were scored. B, cell survival assay. PC12 cells transfected with both sets of chimeras or vector alone (pCDM8) were cultured in serum-free medium (Control) or supplemented with TNF (50 ng/ml). Viable cells were scored using the MTT-based colorimetric assay, and survival was calculated on the basis that survival in the presence of NGF was 100%. Nontransfected PC12 cells were used as an additional control to evaluate the electroporation effects on cell viability.



We also compared TNF-dependent cell survival mediated by the chimeras using an assay based on the ability of NGF to sustain the survival of PC12 cells in serum-free conditioned medium. Each set of transfected cells was subdivided into three pools: one grown in serum-free medium and the other two grown in serum-free medium supplemented with either TNF or NGF. Three days later, cell survival was determined using a MTT-based colorimetric assay. The number of surviving cells was normalized to the cell viability observed in the presence of NGF, which was taken to be 100%. Under these conditions, TNF was able to sustain survival of 70-80% of the cells transfected with either the TB or TC chimera, whereas only 37% of the cells transfected with the vector alone were viable. In the absence of TNF, the survival rate of TB and TC transfectants was 35-40%, which is also in the same range as the background level (Fig. 3B). None of the mutated chimeras showed biological activity when expressed in PC12 cells (Fig. 3, A and B). These data indicate that the ligand-mediated phosphorylation of the tyrosine kinase domains of TrkB and TrkC receptors, like that of TrkA (19) , is necessary and sufficient to induce survival and a neuron-like phenotype in PC12 cells.

Intermolecular Transphosphorylation between Trk Receptors and Chimeras

Homologous Transphosphorylation between Trk and Chimeric Receptors in COS-7 Cells

Given the homology between the various Trk receptors, especially in their intracellular kinase domains, it was of interest to determine if Trk heterodimers form and become autophosphorylated. Jing et al.(9) previously demonstrated that homologous inactive TrkA receptors are tyrosine-phosphorylated when coexpressed with TrkA and the latter activated with NGF. Therefore, our first experiments examined whether a similar transphosphorylation could occur between Trk receptors when only the cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains of these receptors were homologous. The pairs of receptors used initially were active TrkA with inactive chimeric TA-K receptors and chimeric TA with inactive TrkA-K receptors. Corresponding experiments were also carried out with TrkB and TrkC. The cotransfected COS-7 cells were treated with the appropriate neurotrophin or TNF, lysed, and immunoprecipitated using a pan-Trk antiserum that recognizes the C-terminal amino acids common to all Trk and chimeric receptors. Because of their different molecular masses, the full-length and chimeric receptors were readily separated by electrophoresis, and differences in phosphotyrosine content were detected by Western blotting with an anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (anti-pTyr). The state of tyrosine phosphorylation of active Trk receptors and inactive chimeric receptors (or vice versa) can therefore be compared directly.

The kinase-deficient TA-K receptor displayed a very low level of phosphorylation when expressed alone (Fig. 4A, lane 1), but a higher level when cotransfected with TrkA (lane 2). More significantly, not only was the level of TrkA phosphorylation increased on the addition of NGF, as anticipated, but so was the level of phosphorylation of TA-K (Fig. 4A, lane 3; see also Fig. 7A, lanes 1 and 3). In the converse experiments, the effect of coexpression of the chimeric TA receptor with full-length kinase-deficient TrkA-K was examined. Expression of TrkA-K by itself did not result in autophosphorylation of the receptor (Fig. 5, lane 1). Coexpression of TrkA-K with TA resulted in significant phosphorylation of both receptors in the absence of TNF (Fig. 5, lane 2). The addition of TNF increased the phosphorylation of the chimeric TA receptor, again as anticipated, and this was accompanied by an increase in the phosphorylation of TrkA-K (Fig. 5, lane 3). Both bands of the two receptors were affected. These data suggest that transphosphorylation on tyrosine residues occurs between TrkA and the inactive chimeric receptor or between the active chimeric receptor and inactive TrkA and that an inactive receptor monomer can be transphosphorylated by an active receptor monomer irrespective of whether the extracellular domain is homologous. That the transphosphorylation results with the chimeric receptors are the same as with the normal receptors also suggests that the extracellular TNF domains may not exert any selective positive or negative influence on the heterologous interactions compared with the normal Trk extracellular domains.


Figure 7: Tyrosine transphosphorylation of cotransfected kinase-deficient TrkA-K and TrkA, TrkB, and TrkC receptors in COS-7 cells. A, COS-7 cells were cotransfected with inactive TrkA (TrkA-K) and active TrkA (lanes 1 and 2), TrkB (lanes 3 and 4), or TrkC (lanes 5 and 6). Transfected cells were treated with (lanes 2, 4, and 6) or without (lanes 1, 3, and 5) NGF, BDNF, or NT-3, respectively, and the cell lysate was immunoprecipitated with the TrkA-specific antibody. TrkA and TrkA-K receptor protein expression levels (upper panel) and phosphotyrosine content (lower panel) were determined as described in the legend of Fig. 1. Aliquots of the cell lysate of each sample were used to immunoprecipitate TrkB and TrkC receptors using pan-Trk antibody, and receptor tyrosine phosphorylation was determined (data not shown). B, the selectivity of the TrkA-specific antibody was determined by transfecting COS-7 cells with TrkA-K (lanes 1 and 2), TrkB (lanes 3 and 4), and TrkC (lanes 5 and 6). Transfected cells were treated with (lanes 2, 4, and 6) or without (lanes 1, 3, and 5) NGF, BDNF, or NT-3, respectively, and the cell lysate was immunoprecipitated with the TrkA-specific antibody. TrkA-K receptor protein expression levels (upper panel) and phosphotyrosine content (lower panel) were determined and indicated that neither inactive nor phosphorylated TrkB and TrkC were recognized by this antibody.



When TrkB was coexpressed with inactive TB-K, the level of phosphorylation of the latter receptor increased along with that of TrkB on addition of BDNF (Fig. 4B, lane 5), suggesting that TrkB forms heterodimers with and transphosphorylates inactive chimeric TB-K. In contrast, no increase in the phosphorylation of TC-K coexpressed with TrkC was observed on addition of NT-3 (Fig. 4C, lanes 6 and 7) even though the phosphorylation of TrkC itself was significantly increased. Whether this is because the constitutive levels of phosphorylation of TC-K when cotransfected with TrkC are already high or because heterodimers of active TrkC and inactive TC-K do not form cannot be determined from these experiments. The converse experiments investigating whether TNF-activated TB or TC can transphosphorylate inactive TrkB or TrkC, respectively, have not been done.

Heterologous Transphosphorylation between Trk and Chimeric Receptors in COS-7 Cells

The second series of experiments explored whether transphosphorylation can occur between different Trk receptors. Coexpression of neither TrkB nor TrkC with TA-K resulted in enhanced phosphorylation of the latter on addition of BDNF or NT-3, respectively (Fig. 4A, lanes 5 and 7), in spite of the increased phosphorylation of TrkB by BDNF (lane 5) and of TrkC by NT-3 (lane 7). In a similar vein, neither TB-K nor TC-K was phosphorylated when expressed with NGF-activated TrkA (Fig. 4B, lane 3; and C, lane 3). Furthermore, TNF-activated TB or TC failed to transphosphorylate kinase-deficient TrkA-K (Fig. 5, lanes 4 and 6, respectively). Therefore, transphosphorylation does not occur between TrkA and TrkB or between TrkA and TrkC.

A somewhat different picture emerges with TrkB and TrkC. NT-3 activated TrkC transphosphorylated TB-K (Fig. 4B, lane 7), although BDNF-activated TrkB does not appear to transphosphorylate TC-K (Fig. 4C, lane 5). Whether the high level of constitutive phosphorylation of TC-K cotransfected with TrkB and TrkC hides its transphosphorylation again cannot be determined. These data suggest that a heterodimer can form between the receptor monomers of TrkC and TB-K, with the inactive kinase domain of TB-K being a substrate for heterozygous transphosphorylation by TrkC.

Homologous and Heterologous Transphosphorylation between TrkB and Chimeric Receptors in Fibroblasts

The high constitutive phosphorylation of the Trk and chimeric receptors in COS-7 cells that interfered with the detection of transphosphorylation led to a search for another non-neuronal cell in which receptor expression did not result in constitutive receptor phosphorylation. The NIH-3T3 fibroblasts turned out to be such a cell line. Coexpression of TrkB with the active chimeric TA, TB, or TC receptor was achieved without constitutive phosphorylation of any of the receptors (Fig. 6, lanes 1, 3, and 5). Activation of TrkB with BDNF resulted in the expected significant phosphorylation of this receptor in each of the three different transfected cells (Fig. 6, lanes 2, 4, and 6). As noted in COS-7 cells, the activation of TrkB failed to transphosphorylate the chimeric TA receptor (Fig. 6, lane 2), but it did lead to transphosphorylation of the chimeric TB receptor (lane 4). In addition, the transphosphorylation of the chimeric TC receptor by activated TrkB was observed (Fig. 6, lane 6). These results obtained in fibroblasts extend the observations made in COS-7 cells and, taken together, show that the active kinase domains of TrkB and TrkC can transphosphorylate the inactive domain of the other receptor even when the extracellular domains are not the same.


Figure 6: Tyrosine transphosphorylation of the transfected chimeric TA, TB, and TC receptors in NIH-3T3 cells expressing TrkB. NIH-3T3 cells expressing rat TrkB were transfected with TA (lanes 1 and 2), TB (lanes 3 and 4), or TC (lanes 5 and 6). Transfected cells were treated with (lanes 2, 4, and 6) or without (lanes 1, 3, and 5) BDNF (50 ng/ml) for 5 min, and the phosphotyrosine content was determined. Arrowheads indicate the migration of rat TrkB (upper) and the chimeric TA, TB, and TC receptors (lower). Stripped blots developed with pan-Trk antibody showed comparable protein expression of the cotransfected receptors.



Intermolecular Transphosphorylation between TrkA and TrkB or TrkC Receptors

The failure of TrkB or TrkC, activated by BDNF and NT-3, respectively, to transphosphorylate TA-K may be due either to some malfunctioning of this chimeric receptor that prevents interpretation of the result or to a real restriction on the ability of TA-K to take part in transphosphorylation reactions with the other two receptors. The finding that NGF-activated TrkA fails to transphosphorylate chimeric TB-K or TC-K receptors that do take part in transphosphorylation reactions suggests, but does not prove, that the second explanation is more likely. It has now been possible to confirm this second explanation with the natural Trk receptors. To study transphosphorylation between the Trk receptors themselves requires antibodies that specifically immunoprecipitate a single Trk receptor. One such antibody exists that immunoprecipitates active TrkA or inactive TrkA-K, but not TrkB or TrkC (Fig. 7B). The upper panel in Fig. 7B shows the precipitation of TrkA-K (but not TrkB or TrkC) at the protein level, while the lower panel shows that the antibody also fails to precipitate phosphorylated TrkB or TrkC (and TrkA-K because this is an inactive receptor; see also Fig. 5, lane 1). With this antibody, it is possible to examine whether activated TrkB or TrkC can transphosphorylate inactive TrkA-K. The latter receptor was chosen over active TrkA because NT-3 can activate TrkA, but not TrkA-K. The upper panel in Fig. 7A shows the level of expression of TrkA and/or TrkA-K in the cotransfection experiments with the various pairs of receptors. The level of protein expression of cotransfected TrkA/TrkA-K is higher than that for the other two pairs because the latter contain only TrkA-K. This experiment shows that TrkA is significantly expressed along with TrkA-K. The expression of TrkB and TrkC in the corresponding transfected cells was noted by first precipitating the cell lysate with pan-Trk antibody and then measuring the constitutive phosphorylation of TrkB or TrkC and the higher phosphorylation of activated TrkB or TrkC with the phosphotyrosine antibody. These phosphorylation levels were substantial (data not shown). The lower panel in Fig. 7A shows the constitutive and activated phosphorylation levels of TrkA when coexpressed with TrkA-K. More important, it shows that the immunoprecipitate obtained with the specific anti-TrkA antibody from the activated TrkB/TrkA-K or TrkC/TrkA-K pair contained no phosphorylated TrkA-K. Therefore, even when the natural Trk receptors are used, no transphosphorylation of TrkA-K by activated TrkB or TrkC is observed.


DISCUSSION

Properties of Chimeric Receptors

As was observed with the chimeric TA receptors, activation of the tyrosine kinase domains of TB and TC with TNF is sufficient to mediate biological activities characteristic of neurotrophins. Mutated chimeric TA(19) , TB, and TC receptors with inactive tyrosine kinase domains (TA-K, TB-K, and TC-K, respectively) failed to mediate any biological responses.

One of the differences that sets the Trk receptors apart from the other tyrosine kinase receptors is the short carboxyl-terminal tail of only 15 amino acid residues. Deletion mutants of chimeric EGF-TrkA receptors have previously indicated that this region is essential for conferring tyrosine kinase activity and high affinity binding to phospholipase C-(28) . Similarly, we found that TNF failed to cause autophosphorylation of the chimeric TB-DeltaC and TC-DeltaC receptors, which lack this region, and found no TNF-dependent neurite extension and cell survival when they were transfected in PC12 cells. These results suggest that the carboxyl-terminal tail is also essential for the activity of TrkB and TrkC, and it seems not to be involved in negative control of the tyrosine kinase domain as has been reported for other tyrosine kinase receptors(35, 36, 37) .

The transmembrane domains of the tyrosine kinase receptors can usually be exchanged in chimeric receptors without affecting their signal transduction capacity(12, 38, 39) . Also, Trk oncogenes lacking the transmembrane domain of TrkA are oncogenic, suggesting that this region is not required for the activation of the tyrosine kinase domain(3) . In contrast, exchanging the transmembrane domains of the Trk receptors with the corresponding regions of TNFR2 in TB-TM and TC-TM produced nonfunctional receptors. TNF treatment of these mutants induced neither autophosphorylation in COS-7 cells nor neurite outgrowth and survival in PC12 cells. These findings differ from the results obtained with the chimeric receptor constructed between the extracellular and transmembrane domains of type 1 TNFR (TNFR1; p55-TNFR) and the cytoplasmic domain of TrkA(19) , where the transmembrane domain from TNFR1 worked equally as well as the same domain from TrkA. It should be noted, however, that these chimeric receptors (TNFR1-TrkA) were much less efficient at autophosphorylation and signal transduction than the TNFR2-TrkA receptor. Since the cytoplasmic regions of TNFR2 lack the characteristic consensus sequences found in a tyrosine kinase domain, it is possible that its transmembrane domain might be unable to properly transduce the signals leading to receptor dimerization and autophosphorylation.

Transphosphorylation of Trk Receptors with the Same Kinase Domains

The results show that transphosphorylation of inactive TrkA and inactive TA-K receptors by TNF-activated chimeric TA and NGF-activated TrkA receptors, respectively, occurs in COS-7 cells in spite of different extracellular domains in the receptor pairs. Similarly, BDNF-activated TrkB transphosphorylates inactive TB-K receptors in COS-7 cells and active TB receptors in fibroblasts. It seems likely that this phenomenon should extend to TrkC and the corresponding chimeric TC receptors, although the effect may well have been masked by the high constitutive phosphorylation of these receptors in COS-7 cells. These data fit well with the previously observed transphosphorylation of inactive TrkA receptors by NGF-activated TrkA (19) and with the other examples in fibroblasts, in which a ligand-induced phosphorylation of an active tyrosine kinase receptor leads to transphosphorylation of an inactive but homologous tyrosine kinase domain in a second receptor.

Transphosphorylation of Trk Receptors

Transphosphorylation of an active chimeric TC receptor by BDNF-activated TrkB in fibroblasts and of an inactive TB receptor by NT-3-activated TrkC in COS-7 cells suggests that the kinase domains of TrkB and TrkC are sufficiently homologous to permit the formation of heterodimers under certain conditions in spite of different ligand-binding domains. Similar results have been reported using a chimeric EGF-insulin receptor, where transphosphorylation of both the insulin receptor (identical intracellular but different extracellular domains) and the EGF receptor (identical extracellular and homologous intracellular domains) was observed(11, 12) . The erbB-2 receptor is also a substrate for the EGF-activated EGF receptor in mammary carcinoma cells(13) , and the Bek and Flg fibroblast growth factor receptors can transphosphorylate each other in fibroblasts(15) . What is perhaps unique and unusual about the chimeric TNFR2-Trk receptors used here is that the ligand TNF causes trimerization of the TNF receptors (40) rather than dimerization as with the neurotrophins and the Trk receptors or with EGF and insulin and the EGF and insulin receptors, respectively. Nevertheless, transphosphorylation is still readily observed. Surprisingly, TrkA does not take part in transphosphorylation reactions with TrkB or TrkC in fibroblasts or COS-7 cells, even though significant homology exists between the kinase domains of these receptors. This result was observed with the natural Trk receptors as well as the chimeric receptors. It is interesting that TrkA stands out from TrkB and TrkC in other ways. While the temporal and spatial expression of TrkB and TrkC in the central nervous system is widespread and similar, that of TrkA is highly restricted and different(30) . TrkB and TrkC are expressed in multiple forms, including truncated receptors(3) , while TrkA, apart from one splice variant(41) , is not. Furthermore, although the immunoglobulin-like domains close to the transmembrane domain of the TrkB and TrkC receptors are the unique binding sites for BDNF and NT-3, respectively, the situation with the NGF-binding site on TrkA is more complex(31) .

The two conclusions of this work are that Trk receptor transphosphorylation is observed in COS-7 cells and fibroblasts and that TrkA is excluded from these reactions. The nature of the mechanisms that prevent TrkA from forming heterodimers has not been addressed in this work and need to be clarified before the data can be extrapolated to neurons. Another approach to this problem will be to use the neurotrophin heterodimers that have been shown to form efficiently in cells that express more than one neurotrophin and that are stable enough to allow their purification(42, 43, 44) . These heterodimers display biological activity(42, 43) , and whether this involves the formation of Trk heterodimers will be a question of great interest.


FOOTNOTES

*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant NS04270, Alzheimer's Association Grant IIRG-92-138, and American Cancer Society Grants BE-47L and DB-64M. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
Supported by the Fondazione Marino Golinelli. Current address: Dept. of Pharmacology, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.

Supported by the Swiss National Foundation and the Swiss Academy of Medical Science. Current address: K-681.5.09, Ciba, 4002 Basel, Switzerland.

**
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 415-723-5811; Fax: 415-725-0388.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: NGF, nerve growth factor; BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; NT-3, neurotrophin-3; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; TNFR1 and TNFR2, type 1 and 2 TNF receptors, respectively; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; MTT, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; EGF, epidermal growth factor; pan-Trk, recognizes TrkA, TrkB, and TrkC.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are very grateful to David Kaplan for generously providing the pan-Trk antiserum; Stuart C. Feinstein for providing the TrkA-specific antibody; Werner Lesslauer and Hansruedi Loetscher for providing TNF, TNFR2, and anti-TNFR2 antibody; George Yancopoulos for providing full-length rat TrkB and TrkC; and Hua Zhou for providing the NIH-3T3 fibroblast cell line stably transfected with the rat TrkB receptor. We are grateful to G. Jackson Snipes and Philip Barker for critical reading of this manuscript and to Neil Verity and John Heymach for helpful discussions.


REFERENCES

  1. Meakin, S. O., and Shooter, E. M. (1992) Trends Neurosci. 15, 323-331 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Chao, M. V., and Hempstead, B. L. (1995) Trends Neurosci. 18, 321-326
  3. Barbacid, M. (1993) in Molecular Genetics of Nervous System Tumors (Levine, A. J., and Schmidek, H. H., eds) pp. 123-135, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
  4. Chun, L. L., and Patterson, P. H. (1977) J. Cell Biol. 75, 705-711 [Abstract]
  5. Greene, L. A. (1977) Dev. Biol. 58, 96-105 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Hohn, A., Leinbrock, J., Bailey, K., and Barde, Y.-A. (1990) Nature 334, 339-341
  7. Thoenen, H., and Barde, Y. A. (1980) Physiol. Rev. 60, 1284-1325 [Free Full Text]
  8. Lindsay, R. M., Thoenen, H., and Barde, Y.-A. (1985) Dev. Biol. 112, 319-328 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Jing, S., Tapley, P., and Barbacid, M. (1992) Neuron 9, 1067-1079 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Ullrich, A., and Schlessinger, J. (1990) Cell 61, 203-212 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Ballotti, R., Lammers, R., Scimeca, J.-C., Dull, T., Schlessinger, J., Ullrich, A., and Van Obberghen, E. (1989) EMBO J. 8, 3303-3309 [Abstract]
  12. Lammers, R., Van Obberghen, E., Ballotti, R., Schlessinger, J., and Ullrich, A. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 16886-16890 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Herbst, R., Lammers, R., Schlessinger, J., and Ullrich, A. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 19908-19916 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. King, C. R., Borello, I., Bellot, F., Comoglio, P., and Schlessinger, J. (1988) EMBO J. 7, 1647-1651 [Abstract]
  15. Bellot, F., Crumley, G., Kaplow, J. M., Schlessinger, J., Jaye, M., and Dionne, C. A. (1991) EMBO J. 10, 2849-2854 [Abstract]
  16. Hack, N., Sue-a-Quan, A., Mills, G. B., and Skorecki, K. L. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 26441-26446 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. McMahon, S. B., Armanini, M. P., Ling, L. H., and Phillips, H. S. (1994) Neuron 12, 1161-1171 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Verge, V. M. K., Wetmore, C., and Hokfelt, T. (1993) Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 19, 1477
  19. Rovelli, G., Heller, R. A., Canossa, M., and Shooter, E. M. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 8717-8721 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Gluzman, Y. (1981) Cell 23, 175-182 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Greene, L. A., and Tishler, A. S. (1976) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 73, 2424-2428 [Abstract]
  22. Luthman, H., and Magnusson, G. (1983) Nucleic Acid Res. 11, 1295-1305 [Abstract]
  23. Squinto, S. P., Stitt, T. N., Aldrich, T. H., Davis, S., Bianco, S. M., Radziejewski, C., Glass, D. J., Masiakowski, P., Furth, M. E., Valenzuela, D. M., DiStefano, P. S., and Yancopoulos, G. D. (1991) Cell 65, 885-893
  24. Deleted in proof
  25. Deleted in proof
  26. Seed, B. (1987) Nature 329, 840-842 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Hohmann, H. P., Remy, R., Brockhaus, M., and van Loon, A. P. G. M. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 14927-14934 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Obermeier, A., Halfter, H., Wiesmüller, K.-H., Jung, G., Schlessinger, J., and Ullrich, A. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 933-941 [Abstract]
  29. Valenzuela, D. M., Maisonpierre, P. C., Glass, D., Rojas, E., Nunez, L., Kong, Y., Gies, D. R., Stitt, T., Ip, N. Y., and Yancopoulos, G. D. (1993) Neuron 10, 963-974 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Tsoulfas, P., Soppet, D., Escandon, E., Tessarollo, L., Mendoza-Ramirez, J.-L., Rosenthal, A., Nikolics, K., and Parada, L. F. (1993) Neuron 10, 975-990 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Urfer, R., Tsoulfas, P., O'Connel, L., Shelton, D. L., Parada, L. F., and Presta, L. G. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 2795-2805 [Abstract]
  32. Deleted in proof
  33. Deleted in proof
  34. Deleted in proof
  35. Russell, D. S., Gherzi, R., Johnson, E. L., Chou, C.-K., and Rosen, O. M. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 11833-11840 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Honegger, A. M., Dull, T. J., Bellot, F., Van Obberghen, E., Szapary, D., Schmidt, A., Ullrich, A., and Schlessinger, J. (1988) EMBO J. 7, 3045-3052 [Abstract]
  37. Khazaie, K., Dull, T. J., Graf, T., Schlessinger, J., Ullrich, A., Beug, H., and Vennstrom, B. (1988) EMBO J. 7, 3061-3071 [Abstract]
  38. Riedel, H., Dull, T. J., Honegger, A. M., Schlessinger, J., and Ullrich, A. (1988) EMBO J. 8, 2943-2954 [Abstract]
  39. Lee, J., Dull, T. J., Lax, I., Schlessinger, J., and Ullrich, A. (1989) EMBO J. 8, 167-173 [Abstract]
  40. Banner, D. W., D'Arcy, A., Janes, W., Gentz, R., Schoenfeld, H.-J., Broger, C., Loetscher, H., and Lesslauer, W. (1993) Cell 73, 431-446 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Barker, P. A., Lomen-Hoerth, C., Gensch, E. M., Meakin, S. O., Glass, D. J., and Shooter, E. M. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 1-8 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Jungbluth, S., Bailey, K., and Barde, Y. A. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 221, 677-685 [Abstract]
  43. Radziejewski, C., and Robinson, R. C. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 13350-13356 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Heymach, J. V., and Shooter, E. M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 12297-12304 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.