©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Homeostasis of Cell-surface Glycosphingolipid Content in B16 Melanoma Cells
EVIDENCE REVEALED BY AN ENDOGLYCOCERAMIDASE (*)

(Received for publication, November 13, 1995; and in revised form, January 22, 1996)

Makoto Ito (1) (2)(§) Hironobu Komori (1)

From the  (1)Laboratory of Marine Biochemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, 6-10-1 Hakozaki, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812 and (2)Mitsubishi Kasei Institute of Life Sciences, 11 Minamiooya, Machida 194, Tokyo, Japan

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the homeostasis of glycosphingolipid (GSL) on the cell surface as revealed for the first time by an application of endoglycoceramidase (EGCase) capable of hydrolyzing the linkage between the oligosaccharide and the ceramide of various GSLs. When cell-surface GSLs of B16 melanoma cells were hydrolyzed by the action of EGCase, the synthesis of GSLs was found to increase transiently, possibly due to the activation of UDP-glucose:ceramide glucosyltransferase. As a result, the cell-surface GSL content was restored quickly to exactly the same level found without the EGCase treatment, if EGCase was removed from the cell culture. Treatment of erythrocytes with EGCase was found to increase the ceramide content of the plasma membrane. Surprisingly, however, in B16 cells the increase of membrane ceramide by EGCase caused the suppression of de novo ceramide production, resulting in maintenance of the ceramide content of B16 cells at the same level even after EGCase treatment. The signal for homeostatic regulation could be the ceramide released by the action of EGCase, since C(2)-ceramide was found to mimic in part the action of EGCase; it suppressed de novo production of ceramide and was directly converted to GSL, NeuAcalpha2,3Galbeta1,4Glcbeta1,1 N-acetylsphingosine (C(2)-ceramide GM(3)). Our finding demonstrates a novel form of homeostatic regulation coupled to the GSL-synthesizing system in mammalian cells for maintaining the contents of both cell-surface GSLs and free ceramide. Since many opportunistic pathogens were found to produce EGCase extracellularly, this restoration mechanism could also be present as a defense mechanism against microbial EGCase.


INTRODUCTION

Glycosphingolipids (GSLs) (^1)are characteristic constituents of plasma membranes of mammalian cells and may modulate cell proliferation, differentiation, and cell-cell interaction(1) . Although both the GSL content and the composition were found to change drastically during cellular differentiation and oncogenic transformation(2) , under static conditions they could be kept constant in individual organelles, cell types, and organs, in spite of a continuous lipid flow between plasma membranes and intracellular organelles(3, 4) . However, the molecular mechanism for maintaining the content and composition of cell-surface GSLs is presently not well understood.

Endoglycoceramidase (EGCase) is an enzyme that specifically hydrolyzes the linkage between oligosaccharide and ceramide of various GSLs(5, 6) . By using EGCase with the assistance of its protein activator(7, 8) , cell-surface GSLs of erythrocytes were found to be hydrolyzed specifically without damaging other cell membrane components(9, 10) . We observed that the decrease of the GM(3)(NeuAc) content of B16 melanoma cells during EGCase treatment was much slower than GM(3)(NeuGc) of equine erythrocytes, although the initial velocity of EGCase toward GM(3)(NeuAc) is exactly the same as that toward GM(3)(NeuGc)(10) . This observation motivated us to undertake this study. We report here a novel form of homeostatic regulation of cell-surface GSLs coupled to a GSL-synthesizing system that may include the activation of UDP-glucose:ceramide glucosyltransferase.

Treatment of erythrocytes with EGCase was found to increase the ceramide content of the plasma membrane(9) . Ceramide (11, 12, 13, 14) and its metabolites, ceramide 1-phosphate(15) , sphingosine(16) , sphingosine 1-phosphate (17) and N,N-dimethylsphingosine(18) , were found to evoke various physiological effects on various types of cells. Surprisingly, however, we also observed that in B16 cells the increase of membrane ceramide by EGCase causes the suppression of de novo ceramide production, with the result that the ceramide content in B16 cells is maintained at the same level even after EGCase treatment. This study clearly demonstrates the presence of a novel form of homeostasis at the cellular level, which maintains the content of both cell-surface GSLs and ceramide in mammalian cells.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

Monoclonal antibody M2590 and FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgM were purchased from Cosmo Bio. Co. C(2)-ceramide was purchased from Matreya. [^14C]Gal was obtained from DuPont NEN, and TLC and high performance TLC plates (silica gel 60) were from Merck, Germany. C(2)-ceramide GM(3) was obtained from Wako Co., UDP-Glc from Nacalai Tesque, Inc., Japan, and C(6) NBD-ceramide from Molecular Probes Co. D-threo-PDMP was kindly provided by Dr. J. Inokuchi of the Seikagaku Co., Japan.

Preparation of EGCase and Activator Protein

EGCase II was isolated from the culture supernatant of a Rhodococcus sp. M-750 as described in (6) . Activator II, which specifically stimulates the activity of EGCase II, was isolated from a Rhodococcus sp. M-777 as described in (7) . In this study, a 27.9-kDa polypeptide possessing activity identical to that of the native activator II (69.2 kDa) was prepared from activator II by trypsin treatment followed by a trypsin inhibitor column as described in (8) . This 27.9-kDa polypeptide and EGCase II were used for all experiments in this study and are referred to simply as activator and EGCase, respectively. The EGCase and the activator preparations used in this study each showed a single protein band after staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. Both preparations contained no exoglycosidases, proteases, sphingomyelinase, and GlcTase.

Cell Culture and Treatment with EGCase

B16 melanoma cells were grown in MEM supplemented with 10% FCS at 37 °C in a humidified 95% air, 5% CO(2) incubator. For the hydrolysis of cell-surface GSLs with EGCase, cells were seeded in 24-well microplates and precultured for 3 h to attach the cells to the plate. After preincubation, the medium was replaced with 200 µl of fresh MEM supplemented with 5% FCS containing 20 milliunits of EGCase with 10 nmol of activator and incubated at 37 °C in a CO(2) incubator for the time indicated.

Determination of GM(3) Hydrolysis of B16 Melanoma Cells and Erythrocytes

For the determination of GM(3) hydrolysis of B16 cells, GM(3) remaining in the cells after EGCase treatment was determined by high performance TLC as described in (9) . Hydrolysis of cell-surface GM(3) of erythrocytes was determined by the measurement of GM(3) oligosaccharides released by the action of EGCase using high-performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (Dionex) as shown in (9) .

Metabolic Labeling

B16 melanoma cells before and after EGCase treatment were incubated with 200 µl of fresh MEM supplemented with 5% FCS containing 1 µCi of either [^14C]Gal or [^14C]Ser for the time indicated.

Extraction of GSLs and Ceramide and Analysis by TLC

B16 cells were harvested by centrifugation (800 rpm for 10 min) and washed twice with PBS. For extraction of GSLs, the cells were suspended in 750 µl of isopropyl alcohol/hexane/water (55:35:10, v/v) and subjected to sonication for 20 min and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 5 min. For extraction of ceramide, chloroform/methanol (2:1, v/v) was used. The supernatants obtained were dried under N(2) gas and dissolved in 20 µl of chloroform/methanol (2:1, v/v) and applied to the TLC plate, which was then developed with chloroform/methanol/0.2% KCl (5:4:1, v/v) for GSLs and chloroform/methanol/NH(4)OH (90:10:1, v/v) for ceramide. Each radioactive GSL and ceramide separated on a TLC plate was analyzed and quantified by an imaging analyzer (BAS1000 model, Fuji Film, Japan).

Staining of Cell-surface GM(3) with a Specific Monoclonal Antibody M2590

B16 cells (5 times 10^5) were incubated with 100 µl of monoclonal antibody M2590 specific to GM(3)(NeuAc) (19) at 5 °C for 30 min. After being washed twice with PBS, the B16 cells were treated with 100 µl of secondary antibody (FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgM) at 5 °C for 30 min and then analyzed by flow cytometry (FACScan, Becton Dickinson). For a negative control, staining with M2590 was omitted.

Assay of UDP-glucose:Ceramide Glucosyltransferase (GlcTase)

GlcTase activity was determined using UDP-Glc as the donor and C(6) NBD-ceramide as the acceptor according to the method of Hirabayashi et al. (^2)50 µg of C(6) NBD-ceramide were mixed with 500 µg of lecithin and 10 µg of sulfatide in 1 ml of distilled water to form liposomes. To prepare cell lysates, cells (5 times 10^5) were washed with 1 ml of PBS and were suspended in 50 µl of 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5. The incubation mixture contains 10 µl of liposomes, 500 µM UDP-Glc (sodium salt), 1 mM EDTA, and cell lysate (50 µg as protein) in 50 µl of 16 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5. After incubation at 32 °C for 1 h, 100 µl of chloroform/methanol (2:1, v/v) were added to terminate the reaction, and the lower layer was applied to TLC, which was developed with chloroform/methanol/12 mM MgCl(2) (65:25:4, v/v). The NBD-GlcCer produced was determined with a Shimadzu CS-9300 chromatoscanner (excitation 475 nm, emission 525 nm). Protein content of cell extract was determined by BCA method (Pierce) with bovine serum albumin as the standard(20) .

Addition of Synthetic Short-chain Ceramides or Natural Ceramides

C(2)-ceramide or natural ceramide from bovine brain was first dissolved in ethanol/decane (98:2, v/v)(21) . The solution was added to the above medium in a tube and mixed well with a Vortex mixer. The final concentration of the ethanol/decane solution in the medium was 0.5%.

Identification of Short-chain Ceramide GSLs by EGCase

GSL with short-chain ceramide was scraped from a TLC plate and suspended in 1 ml of chloroform/methanol (2:1, v/v) followed by sonication for 20 min. After centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 5 min, the supernatant was dried and dissolved in 20 µl of 10 mM acetate buffer, pH 6.0, containing 0.2% Triton X-100. 10 µl of EGCase (5 milliunits) were added. After incubation at 37 °C overnight, the reaction mixture was dried and dissolved in 20 µl of 50% methanol and applied to a TLC plate, which was then developed with chloroform/methanol/0.2% KCl (5:4:1, v/v). ^14C-Labeled oligosaccharides were analyzed and quantified by an imaging analyzer (BAS1000 model, Fuji Film, Japan).


RESULTS

Hydrolysis of Cell-surface GM(3) of B16 Melanoma Cells and Its Restoration

The decrease in the content of GM(3)(NeuAc) of B16 melanoma cells after EGCase treatment was found to occur much more slowly than that of GM(3)(NeuGc) of equine erythrocytes (Fig. 1A), although the hydrolysis rate of GM(3)(NeuAc) by EGCase was previously found to be identical to that of GM(3)(NeuGc)(10) . It was also noted that the GSLs of plasma membrane fractions of A431 cells were hydrolyzed much faster by EGCase than those of intact cells(22) . These discrepancies of apparent hydrolysis rate, therefore, may arise because these cells or membranes either possess the synthetic pathway for GSLs or they do not. The GM(3) content of B16 cells was thus examined immediately after EGCase treatment and also after re-culturing in MEM without the enzyme. It was of interest that the level of GM(3) was restored to the same as that without EGCase treatment after 3-6 h when EGCase was removed from the cell culture, and the content of GM(3) was strictly maintained at the same level, 0.8-0.9 nmol/10^6 cells, for 24 h (Fig. 1B). In order to examine whether restoration might occur on the cell surface of B16 cells, this factor was examined by flow cytometry after staining the cells with the monoclonal antibody M2590, which is specific to GM(3)(19) . The cell-surface GM(3), which is an end product in B16 cells, was intensely stained with this monoclonal antibody (Fig. 2A). The content was reduced by EGCase treatment (Fig. 2D) but recovered quite rapidly after the removal of EGCase from the culture (Fig. 2E). After 6 h the cell-surface GM(3) content of about 85% of the cells was completely restored to the original level before treatment with EGCase (Fig. 2F). It should be noted that D-threo-PDMP(23) , an inhibitor of GSL synthesis, enhanced the disappearance of cell-surface GSLs by EGCase (Fig. 2C), whereas PDMP did not affect EGCase activity.


Figure 1: Hydrolysis of cell-surface GM(3) by EGCase and its restoration after removal of the enzyme. A, hydrolysis of cell-surface GM(3) by EGCase. B16 cells (1 times 10^6) or equine erythrocytes (1 times 10^7) were incubated at 37 °C for the time indicated in 400 µl of 20 mM PBS, pH 7.2, with 40 milliunits of EGCase in the presence of 20 nmol of activator. The hydrolysis of cell-surface GM(3) was determined by the method described under ``Experimental Procedures''; B, B16 cells (1 times 10^6) were incubated at 37 °C for 6 h in 400 µl of MEM containing 5% FCS with 40 milliunits of EGCase in the presence of 20 nmol of activator. At time 0, the medium was replaced with fresh medium without the enzyme and then incubated at 37 °C in a CO(2) incubator for the time indicated. Values are the mean for duplicate determinations. The range of deviation of all measured results was within 5%.




Figure 2: Restoration of cell-surface GM(3) of B16 cells revealed by cytofluorometric analysis. B16 cells (5 times 10^5) were incubated with 20 milliunits of EGCase in the presence of 10 nmol of activator in 200 µl of MEM containing 5% FCS in a CO(2) incubator at 37 °C for 16 h. Cells with or without EGCase treatment were incubated with M2590 monoclonal antibody followed by a second incubation with FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgM and analyzed by flow cytometry as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' A, without EGCase treatment (positive control); B, without first antibody (negative control); C, EGCase treatment in the presence of 40 µMD-threo-PDMP; D, EGCase treatment; E, after EGCase treatment, washing and re-culturing in fresh medium for 3 h; F, the same as E, but re-cultured for 6 h.



GSL Synthesis and UDP-Glc:Ceramide Glucosyltransferase Activity of B16 Melanoma Cells after EGCase Treatment

Since GSLs on the cell surface are quite stable and their turnover is very slow under static conditions, the restoration of cell-surface GSLs observed in this study might be due to a novel form of restoration mechanism coupled to GSL synthesis. Therefore, we examined the actual GSL synthesis of B16 cells with or without treatment by EGCase. When the GSL synthesis of B16 cells after EGCase treatment was evaluated by measuring the incorporation of [^14C]Gal into GSL, the synthesis of GM(3) and its precursors, ceramide monohexoside and lactosylceramide, was found to increase about 2-fold compared with that of control experiments without EGCase treatment (Fig. 3). At the same time it was observed that the UDP-Glc:ceramide glucosyltransferase (GlcTase) activity in the cell lysate of B16 melanoma cells was approximately doubled due to the treatment with EGCase (Fig. 4A). Furthermore, it is significant that both GlcTase activity and GM(3) synthesis decreased to the control level (Fig. 4, A and B) when the level of GM(3) was restored to the level found before EGCase treatment (Fig. 2F). This result clearly indicates that the increase of GSL synthesis, possibly via GlcTase activation, is a transient phenomenon coupled to cell-surface GSL hydrolysis by EGCase. The activation of GlcTase seems to occur posttranslation, since even in the presence of cycloheximide an increase of GM(3) synthesis was observed after EGCase treatment (data not shown).


Figure 3: De novo synthesis of GSLs of B16 cells after EGCase treatment. After treatment of EGCase under the same conditions as indicated in the legend of Fig. 2, B16 cells were washed with fresh medium and metabolically labeled with 1 µCi of [^14C]Gal for 3 h in fresh medium without EGCase. GSLs were extracted and separated with TLC. The determination was performed with an imaging analyzer as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Values are the mean ± S.D. for triplicate determinations. CMH, ceramide monohexoside. Photostimulated luminescence.




Figure 4: Transient increase of de novo synthesis of GM(3) and GlcTase activity after EGCase treatment. A, GlcTase activity; B, de novo synthesis of GM(3). C, control experiment without EGCase treatment; E, EGCase treatment under the same conditions as indicated in the legend of Fig. 2; R, after EGCase treatment, B16 cells were washed with fresh medium and incubated for an additional 6 h in the fresh medium without EGCase. Cell-surface GM(3) was restored as indicated in Fig. 2F. Details are described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Values are the mean ± S.D. for triplicate determinations. Photostimulated luminescence.



This restoration mechanism could be present universally in mammalian cells, since an increase of GSL synthesis after EGCase treatment was observed not only in B16 cells but also in HL60 myelocytic leukemia cells and Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts.

Content and de Novo Synthesis of Ceramide in B16 Cells after EGCase Treatment

We examined the effect of EGCase on ceramide contents of B16 melanoma cells in which the ceramide portion of GSLs was first metabolically labeled with [^14C]Ser. Fig. 5A shows the increase of ceramide in B16 cells after EGCase treatment in which de novo synthesis of ceramide was excluded from the estimation; B16 cells were treated with EGCase in the absence of [^14C]Ser (found at 240% of the control, the value is the total of the upper and lower bands and the mean from triplicate determinations). It was noted that the ceramide of the upper band on TLC increased much more than that of lower band (Fig. 5A). According to a previous report(19) , the upper band may be composed of C24:0 and C24:1 and the lower band C16:0 fatty acids, while both sphingosines may be d18:1. Interestingly, we observed that the ceramide content in B16 cells was not changed at all, even after EGCase treatment, when de novo synthesis of ceramide was included in the estimation; B16 cells were incubated with EGCase in the presence of [^14C]Ser (found at 97% of the control, the value is the total of the upper and lower bands and the mean from triplicate determinations; Fig. 5B). De novo synthesis of ceramide was therefore examined independently with or without treatment with EGCase. It was confirmed that EGCase treatment markedly suppressed the de novo ceramide production, especially that of the upper band (found at 63% of the control, the value is the total of the upper and lower bands and the mean from triplicate determinations; Fig. 5C). This result showed that the increase of membrane ceramide in B16 cells by EGCase may cause the suppression of de novo ceramide production, resulting in maintenance of the ceramide content at the same level even after EGCase treatment. This result is in contrast to that in erythrocytes(8) , in which the GSL-synthesizing system is lost after maturation. It should be noted that neither sphingosine nor N,N-dimethylsphingosine was found after EGCase treatment (Fig. 5A), suggesting that the ceramide released by EGCase could not be directly transported to lysosomes for degradation.


Figure 5: Release of ceramide from B16 cells and suppression of de novo production of ceramide by EGCase treatment. A, release of ceramide from B16 cells by EGCase. B16 cells were incubated with 1 µCi of [^14C]Ser for 2 days, washed with 10 µM cold Ser, suspended in fresh medium, and treated with EGCase under the same conditions as indicated in the legend of Fig. 2. B, the experiment was conducted in the same manner as A, except that EGCase treatment was carried out in the presence of 1 µCi of [^14C]Ser. C, de novo synthesis of ceramide with or without EGCase treatment. B16 cells were treated with EGCase under the same conditions as indicated in the legend of Fig. 2. After EGCase treatment, the cells were washed with fresh medium and then 1 µCi of [^14C]Ser was added. De novo production of ceramide was determined after 3 h. C, control without EGCase; E, EGCase treatment; Cer, ceramide; DM, N,N-dimethylsphingosine; Sph, sphingosine.



Effects of Short-chain Ceramide on de Novo Synthesis of GSLs and Ceramide

As shown in the data described above, both cell-surface GSL and ceramide contents in B16 cells were maintained at the same level under static conditions by a putative restoration system. The next question is, therefore, what is the signal molecule for this homeostatic regulation? EGCase specifically hydrolyzes the cell-surface GSLs without impairing other components and releases the oligosaccharide and ceramide simultaneously. Oligosaccharide released from the cell could be easily diluted in the external medium, whereas the ceramide released could remain in the plasma membrane or might be incorporated into the cytosol. We thus examined the possibility of whether the ceramide released could be a signal molecule for homeostatic regulation using a cell-permeable short-chain ceramide, C(2)-ceramide (N-acetylsphingosine). As shown in Fig. 6A, C(2)-ceramide potently suppressed the de novo production of ceramide in B16 cells. Interestingly, C(2)-ceramide was found to rapidly convert the novel GSL as shown in Fig. 6B. The novel GSL comigrated with standard C(2)-ceramide GM(3) and was hydrolyzed by EGCase to produce sialyllactose (Fig. 6C). These results indicate that the novel GSL is a NeuAc-lactose N-acetylsphingosine (C(2)-ceramide GM(3)). Furthermore, we confirmed that natural ceramide from bovine brain (Sigma) increased GSL synthesis and suppressed de novo ceramide synthesis when it was added to B16 cell cultures in the concentration of 5 µM, although the effect is slightly less than that by short-chain ceramide (data not shown).


Figure 6: Effects of C(2)-ceramide on de novo ceramide production and GSL synthesis. A, de novo synthesis of ceramide with or without C(2)-ceramide treatment. B16 cells (1 times 10^5) were incubated with (5 µM) or without C(2)-ceramide at 37 °C in a CO(2) incubator for 3 h in 200 µl of MEM containing 2 µCi of [^14C]Ser and 5% FCS. ^14C-Labeled ceramide was extracted from cells and determined by an imaging analyzer. Upper and lower represent the ceramide of upper and lower bands on TLC, respectively. Values are the mean ± S.D. for triplicate determinations and are expressed as the percentage of the upper band in the control experiment. B, fluorography showing de novo synthesis of C(2)-ceramide GM(3) after addition of 5 µM C(2)-ceramide. The labeling experiment was conducted by the same method as described in A. In this experiment, [^14C]Gal was used for the precursor instead of [^14C]Ser. Lane 1, control; lane 2, 5 µM C(2)-ceramide. C, fluorography showing the release of [^14C]sialyllactose from both ^14C-labeled normal GM(3) (lane 2) and C(2)-ceramide GM(3) (lane 4) by EGCase. Lanes 1 and 3 represent GM(3) and C(2)-ceramide GM(3), respectively. Details are described under ``Experimental Procedures.''



These results strongly suggest that the ceramide released from GSLs by EGCase might be a signal for the homeostatic regulation of ceramide and cell-surface GSLs.


DISCUSSION

The reason why mammalian cells possess a restoration system of cell-surface GSLs as described in this study remains to be clarified. EGCase has been isolated not only from microorganisms(5, 24) , but also from leeches(25) , earthworms(26) , and clams(27) . The functional significance of this system, however, may only be clarified after the presence of EGCase in mammals is clearly demonstrated, although the presence of the enzyme in rabbit mammary glands has been suggested(28, 29) . We can indicate another possibility, given the fact that several strains of opportunistic pathogens were recently found to secrete EGCase into culture media. (^3)The microorganism isolated as an EGCase producer from land soil (5) was identified as Rhodococcus equi according to physiological, biochemical, and chemotaxonomic studies(30) . Recently it was found that an authentic strain of R. equi ATCC 6939 retained the ability to produce EGCase. R. equi is a Gram-positive actinomycete originally associated with a severe, often fatal pneumonia in foals. More recently, it was identified as an opportunistic pathogen in humans infected with the AIDS virus(31) . Thus we examined the possibility of whether other opportunistic microorganisms can produce EGCase extracellularly. Surprisingly, many bacteria and actinomycetes, including opportunistic pathogens such as Rhodococcus erythropolis, Rhodococcus rhodochrous, Corynebacterium hoagii, Corynebacterium mediolanum, Arthrobacter aurescens, Brevibacterium sterolicum, and Nocardia globerula produce EGCase extracellularly. If such microbes succeeded in entering mammalian tissue, cell-surface GSLs might be exposed to the action of EGCase. Cells therefore might possess the homeostatic regulation system for maintaining GSL content that was demonstrated in this study as a defense mechanism against microbial EGCase. Further investigations should reveal the relationship between pathogenicity and EGCase.

EGCase was found to efficiently hydrolyze the cell-surface GSLs of intact erythrocytes without damaging other cell membrane components (9, 10) and has recently been used for the analysis of functions of endogenous GSLs of A431 cells (21) and cultured cortical neurons(32) . However, for cultured cells, EGCase appeared to hydrolyze cell-surface GSLs very slowly in comparison with erythrocytes (10) or the plasma membrane fraction of cultured cells(21) . This paper may clarify the reason for this, i.e. the hydrolysis of cell-surface GSLs by EGCase evoked an increase of de novo GSL synthesis, possibly due to the activation of GlcTase, and thus cell-surface GSL supply could be reinforced markedly during EGCase treatment, preventing the loss of cell-surface GSLs.

Since ceramide is involved in cell regulation(12) , its intracellular levels must be carefully regulated. We found in this study that the intracellular level of ceramide was maintained at the same level even after EGCase treatment due to the suppression of de novo synthesis of ceramide. The signal might be the ceramide released by the action of EGCase, since a cell-permeable analog of ceramide, C(2)-ceramide, also suppressed the de novo synthesis of ceramide. Furthermore, C(2)-ceramide was found to be converted to C(2)-ceramide GM(3). This result strongly suggests that at least a part of the ceramide released from GSLs by EGCase might be transported directly to the Golgi apparatus where it could be converted to GM(3) and thus could be finally recycled to plasma membrane. This hypothesis is consistent with the fact that the intracellular ceramide released by EGCase could not be converted to sphingosine or N,N-dimethylsphingosine (Fig. 5). Slife et al. (33) have also reported that sphingosine was generated from sphingomyelin by sphingomyelinase treatment of rat liver plasma membranes, but not from GSLs by EGCase, although ceramide was produced from both enzyme treatments. Whether the intracellular metabolism of ceramide released from GSLs by EGCase in intact cells is different from that of sphingomyelin by sphingomyelinase should be carefully clarified, and this study is currently in progress in our laboratory.

Cell-permeable, synthetic short-chain ceramide was found to exert various physiological effects on different cell types; it induced the differentiation of HL-60 cells into monocyte-like cells(11) , the cell-cycle arrest of Molt-4 cells(34) , the programmed cell death of U937 cells(35) , and it inhibited the endocytosis of Chinese hamster ovary cells(14) . However, little is actually known of the intracellular metabolism of the short-chain ceramide. Interestingly, it was revealed in this study that C(2)-ceramide could be converted to C(2)-ceramide ganglioside GM(3) in B16 cells. We have also confirmed that C(6)-ceramide could be converted to C(6)-ceramide GM(3) in B16 cells. The synthesis of these GSLs with short-chain ceramide and the kinetics for their intracellular formation have been reported(36) . These results lead us to the hypothesis that the physiological effects of short-chain ceramide reported so far may be attributed in part to the intracellular formation of short-chain ceramide gangliosides.


FOOTNOTES

*
This work was supported in part by a Grant-in Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas(05274107), a Grant-in Aid for Scientific Research (B)(06454657) from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan, and the Mizutani Foundation for Glycoscience. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-092-642-2900; Fax: 81-092-642-2907.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: GSL(s), glycosphingolipid(s); EGCase, endoglycoceramidase; C(2)-ceramide, N-acetylsphingosine; C(2)-ceramide GM(3), NeuAcalpha2,3Galbeta1,4Glcbeta1,1 N-acetylsphingosine; C(6)-ceramide, N-hexanoylsphingosine; NBD, nitrobenzo-2-oxa-1,3-diazole; Gal, galactose; Ser, serine; GlcTase, UDP-glucose:ceramide glucosyltransferase; PDMP, D- threo-1-phenyl-2-decanoylamino-3-morpholino-1-propanol; MEM, modified Eagle's medium, FCS, fetal calf serum; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.

(^2)
Y. Hirabayashi, personal communication.

(^3)
M. Ito, unpublished results.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. T. Yamagata for his helpful discussions and encouragement throughout the course of this work. We appreciate Y. Ikegami's efforts in preparing EGCase and its activator. We are also grateful to Dr. J. Inokuchi for supplying the PDMP and to Dr. Y. Hirabayashi for his valuable suggestions on the GlcTase assay. We thank Dr. T. Mikawa for providing several strains of bacteria.


REFERENCES

  1. Hakomori, S. (1981) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 50, 733-764 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Hakomori, S. (1985) Cancer Res. 45, 2405-2414 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Koval, M., and Pagano, R. E. (1989) J. Cell Biol. 108, 2169- [Abstract] 2181
  4. Kok, J. W., Eskelinen, S. Hoekstar, K., and Hoekstar, D. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 9896-9900 [Abstract]
  5. Ito, M., and Yamagata, T. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 14278- [Abstract/Free Full Text] 14282
  6. Ito, M., and Yamagata, T. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 9510-9519 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Ito., M., Ikegami, Y., and Yamagata, T. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 7919-7926 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Ito, M., Ikegami, Y., Omori, A., and Yamagata, T. (1991) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 110, 328-332
  9. Ito, M., Ikegami, Y., Tai, T., and Yamagata, T. (1993) Eur. J. Biochem. 218, 637-643 [Abstract]
  10. Ito, M., Ikegami, Y., and Yamagata, T. (1993) Eur. J. Biochem. 218, 645-649 [Abstract]
  11. Okazaki, T., Bielawska, A., Bell, R. M., and Hannun, Y. A. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 15823-15831 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Hannun, Y. A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 3125-3128 [Free Full Text]
  13. Strum, J. C., Swenson, K. I., Turner, J. E., and Bell, R. M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13541-13547 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Chen, C.-S., Rosenwald, A. G., and Pagano, R. E. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13291-13297 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Dressler, K. A., and Kolesnick, R. N. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 14917-14921 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Zhang, H., Buckley, N. E., Gibson, K., and Spiegel, S. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 76-81 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Olivera, A., and Spiegel, S. (1993) Nature 365, 557-560 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Igarashi, Y., Kitamura, K., Toyokuni, T., Dean, B., Fenderson, B., Ogawa, T., and Hakomori, S. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 5385-5389 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Hirabayashi, Y., Hamaoka, A., Matsumoto, M., Matsubara, T., Tagawa, M., Wakabayashi, S., and Taniguchi, M. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 13328-13333 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Smith, P. K., Krohn, R. I., Hermanson, G. T., Mallia, A. K., Gartner, F. H., Provenzano, M. D., Fujimoto, E. K., Goeke, N. M., Olson, B. J., and Klenk, D. C. (1985) Anal. Biochem. 150, 76-85 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Ji, L., Zhang, G., Uematsu, S., Akahori, Y., and Hirabayashi, Y. (1995) FEBS Lett. 358, 211-214 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Ji, L., Ito, M., Zhang, G., and Yamagata, T. (1995) Glycobiology 5, 343-350 [Abstract]
  23. Radin, N. S., and Inokuchi, R. C. (1991) Trends Glycosci. Glycotechnol. 3, 200-213
  24. Asida, H., Yamamoto, K., Kumagai, H., and Tochikura, T. (1992) Eur. J. Biochem. 205, 729-735 [Abstract]
  25. Li, S.-C., DeGaspei, R., Muldrey, J. E., and Li, Y.-T. (1986) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 141, 346-352 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Li, Y.-T., Ishikawa, Y., and Li, S.-C. (1987) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 149, 167-172 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Basu, S. S., Dastgheib-Hosseini, S., Hoover, G., Li, Z., and Basu, S. (1994) Anal. Biochem. 222, 270-274 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Basu, S., Ghosh, S., Basu, M., Hawes, J. W., Das, K. K., Zhang, B.-J., Li, Z., Weng, S-A., and Westervelt, C. (1990) Indian J. Biochem. Biophys. 27, 386-395 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Basu, M., Dastgheib, S., Baker, J., and Basu, S. (1995) Glycoconj. J. 12, 439
  30. Mikawa, T., Sashida, R., Ito, M., and Yamagata, T. (1987) Mitsubishi Chem. R & D Rev. 1, 34-39
  31. Yager, J. A., Prescott, C. A., Kramar, D. P., Hannah, H., Balson, G. A., and Croy, B. A. (1991) Vet. Microbiol. 28, 363-376 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Muramoto, K., Kawahara, M., Kobayashi, K., Ito, M., Yamagata, T., and Kuroda, Y. (1994) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 202, 398-402 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Slife, C. W., Wang, E., Hunter, R., Wang, S., Burgess, C., Liotta D. C., and Merrill, A. H., Jr. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 10371-10377 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Jayadev, S., Liu, B., Bielawska, A. E., Lee, J. Y., Nazaire, F., Pushkareva, M. Y., Obeid, L. M., and Hannun, Y. A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 2047-2052 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Obeid, L. M., Linardic, C. M., Karolac, L. A., and Hannun, Y. A. (1993) Science 259, 1769-1771 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Komori, H., and Ito, M. (1995) FEBS Lett. 374, 299-302 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.