©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Regulation of Amyloid Protein Precursor (APP) Binding to Collagen and Mapping of the Binding Sites on APP and Collagen Type I (*)

(Received for publication, September 7, 1995; and in revised form, November 2, 1995)

Dirk Beher Lars Hesse Colin L. Masters (1) (2) Gerd Multhaup (§)

From the  (1)Center for Molecular Biology Heidelberg (ZMBH), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 282, D-69120 Heidelberg, Federal Republic of Germany Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne and the (2)Neuropathology Laboratory, Mental Health Research Institute of Victoria, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

The specific binding of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) to extracellular matrix molecules suggests that APP regulates cell interactions and has a function as a cell adhesion molecule and/or substrate adhesion molecule. On the molecular level APP has binding sites for collagen, laminin, and glycosaminoglycans which is a characteristic feature of cell adhesion molecules. We have examined the interactions between the APP and collagen types I and IV and identified the corresponding binding sites on APP and collagen type I.

We show that APP bound most efficiently to collagen type I in a concentration-dependent and specific manner in the native and heat-denatured states, suggesting an involvement of a contiguous binding site on collagen. This binding site was identified on the cyanogen bromide fragment alpha1(I)CB6 of collagen type I, which also binds heparin. APP did not bind to collagen type I-heparin complexes, which suggests that there are overlapping binding sites for heparin and APP on collagen. We localized the site of APP that mediates collagen binding within residues 448-465 of APP, which are encoded by the ubiquitously expressed APP exon 12, whereas the high affinity heparin binding site of APP is located in exon 9. Since a peptide encompassing this region binds to collagen type I and inhibits APP-collagen type I binding in nanomolar concentrations, this region may comprise the major part of the collagen type I binding site of APP. Moreover, our data also indicate that the collagen binding site is involved in APP-APP interaction that can be modulated by Zn(II) and heparin. Taken together, the data suggest that the regulation of APP binding to collagen type I by heparin occurs through the competitive binding of heparin and APP to collagen.


INTRODUCTION

The amyloid precursor protein (APP) (^1)belongs to a gene family in which three genes are known. In addition to the APP gene, the genes for the amyloid precursor-related proteins APLP1 and APLP2 map to the human chromosomes 19 (APLP1) (1) and 11 (APLP2)(2, 3) . APP is encoded by the APP gene on the long arm of human chromosome 21 and has attracted attention due to its involvement in the deposition of amyloid betaA4 protein in the brain of patients with familial and sporadic Alzheimer's disease and individuals with trisomy 21(4, 5) .

The role of APP in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease has been underscored by the discovery of mutations within the betaA4 or sequences flanking the betaA4(6, 7, 8) . All of the identified susceptibility genes linked to Alzheimer's disease appear to influence the betaA4 amyloid formation(9, 10, 11) .

From the high degree of evolutionary conservation of the endo- and ectodomain of APP and its widespread tissue expression, APP has been expected to be implicated in a variety of cellular processes and events. Secreted isoforms of APP (APPs) containing a region homologous to the Kunitz protease inhibitor consensus sequence have a role in regulation of extracellular protease activity (12) and are endocytosed by the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein(13) . A possible in vivo function is provided by the discovery that APP is a very potent inhibitor of factor XIa, and APP-factor XIa complexes might be involved in the regulation of the coagulation cascade(14, 15) .

Another possible function of the ectodomain of secreted or membrane-associated forms of APP have also been shown to be involved in neuronal-cell or cell-matrix interactions and cell growth regulation (16, 17, 18, 19) . Here, the ability of APP to stimulate cell adhesion and growth does not depend on the Kunitz protease inhibitor domain but may derive from its high affinities for heparin, heparan sulfate proteoglycans, laminin, and collagen type IV(19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26) .

APP has been shown to bind Zn(II) and Cu(II) at two distinct sites (27, 28) and was recently found to belong to a family of zinc-modulated, heparin-binding proteins(29) . Zn(II) binding was shown to strengthen the binding of APP to heparin, thus demonstrating an interaction of residues involved in ligand binding which are located in different domains(21, 27) . Binding of metallic cations like Zn(II) and Cu(II) may control APP conformation and stability (27, 28, 30) and thus may promote the binding of APP to extracellular matrix elements like heparan sulfate proteoglycans(30) .

We report here the regulation of APP binding to collagen type I by heparin and the mapping of the binding sites for APP to collagen type I and vice versa. Our binding studies reveal that APP binding to collagen type I is mediated by residues 448-465. Since synthetic peptides representing this region show self-aggregational properties, it is suggested that APP-APP binding may exist. APP was identified in the human platelet to be present in membrane associated and soluble forms (31) , and collagen is particularly important for initiation of platelet activation leading to successful formation of a hemostatic plug(32) . For this reason our findings suggest that APP as an adhesive glycoprotein may participate in collagen-induced platelet aggregation and as APPs may take part in the regulation of the coagulation cascade at sites of vascular injury.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

Collagen type I from bovine and human tissues (Sigma C-3511, C-7774) and collagen type IV (human placenta, Sigma C-7521) were used.

Different collagen types were dissolved in 10 mM NaOAc, pH 5.5, and diluted with 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, containing 100 mM NaCl, to appropriate concentrations just before use.

Protein concentrations were determined by amino acid analysis.

Collagen type I was dissolved at 10 mg/ml in 70% formic acid, and solid CNBr (Merck) was added to a final concentration of 20 mg/ml. Digestion was allowed to proceed for 18 h at 4 °C.

Peptides were synthesized according to published methods (33) and purified on C-18 columns with a linear gradient of acetonitrile in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. Sequences were confirmed by amino acid sequence analysis (477A, Applied Biosystems).

Construction of Expression Vectors

The plasmid pFdIgA is based on the procaryotic expression vector pFdIgA(28) . For in vitro mutagenesis according to Kunkel(34) , M13mp18 replicative form DNA was cut with SalI-HindIII and religated in the presence of oligonucleotides TCGACCTGACTAGTTGCA and AGCTTGCAACTAGTCAGG to create a SpeI restriction site. A SacI-SpeI fragment of pFdIgA was cloned into M13mp18-SpeI, and the oligonucleotide CCCACATCTTCTGCAAATCACTATTATTTTTGATGATGAAC was annealed to the single-stranded DNA. The mutated sequence was exchanged with the corresponding fragment of pFdIgA (28) to construct the plasmid pFdIgA.

Purification of APP

APP was isolated from rat brain as described previously(21) .

A full-length (Fd-APP) and truncated recombinant forms of human APP (Fd-APP, TP-APP) were prepared and purified in the form of a prokaryotic expressed Fd fusion protein by methods essentially as described by Weidemann et al.(35) . TP-APP represents the secreted form of APP (alpha-secretase cleaved)(5) .

After preparative SDS-PAGE and electroelution, the soluble protein was separated from salts and SDS by Excellulose GF-5 columns (Pierce).

Protein concentrations were determined by amino acid analysis according to the manufacturer's protocol after hydrolysis with 6 N HCl, 0.1% phenol for 24 h at 110 °C (420A Amino Acid Analysis System, Applied Biosystems).

Binding Assay of Type I Collagen

The binding of proteins to collagen was determined by either dot blot or a solid-phase assay. The dot blot assay was performed as described previously for APP-heparin binding(21) . The inhibitory effect of heparin was studied in the dot blot assay after preincubation of 3.5 pmol of I-rn-APP with 125 µg/ml heparin in 1 times PBS for 4 h at room temperature and separating the protein from salts and free heparin by Excellulose GF-5 columns (Pierce) and preincubation of dots coated with collagen in the presence of 40 µg/ml heparin in 1 times PBS for 1 h.

After adsorption of collagen to microtiter wells, nonspecific binding sites were blocked by incubation for longer than 1 h with 1% BSA in PBS. I-Labeled proteins were diluted with PBS and added to the wells (1 times 10^3 to 2 times 10^6 cpm/well), together with the reagents to be tested. After a 3-h incubation at room temperature, the wells were emptied. The plate was divided into separate wells, and the radioactivity of bound ligand was measured by liquid scintillation counting.

The value obtained with wells coated with BSA was subtracted, as this represents nonspecific binding. Results were expressed as the mean of duplicate determinations, which usually did not differ by more than 10%.

Determination of the Collagen Binding Domain of APP

Purified rat brain APP and fusion proteins Fd-APP and Fd-APP were incubated at 37 °C overnight with endoproteinase Lys-C (5 µg) (Boehringer Mannheim). After inactivating the protease for 1 min at 110 °C, fragments were incubated in PBS overnight at room temperature with collagen type I bound to microtiter wells. After being washed three times with cold PBS, bound peptides were extracted with formic acid. High performance liquid chromatography revealed one major fragment (16 kDa) in the eluate. The NH(2)-terminal sequence was AAQIRSQVMTHLRVIYERMNQSLSLLYNVPAVA, corresponding to residues 448-480 of APP. Similar digestions of I-rn-APP generated the same sized fragment as visualized by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography.

Synthetic peptides representing candidates for the collagen binding region on APP and control peptides were dissolved in 0.1 times PBS and tested as competing ligands for I-APP-collagen type I (human placenta) binding. Collagen type I was dot-blotted in duplicate onto nitrocellulose (0.05-10 µg) and nonspecific binding sites were blocked with 1% BSA in 1 times PBS for 1 h at room temperature. The dot blot was cut into strips and incubated with I-APP together with and without competing peptides for 3 h at room temperature in 0.1 times PBS. After incubation the dot blot was washed one time with blocking buffer, and the dots were excised, placed in scintillant, and assayed by counting. Variations of this binding assay were occasionally used and are indicated in the text and figure legends.

Determination of the APP Binding Domain of Collagen

In order to separate chains alpha1(I) and alpha2(I) of collagen type I, 2-3 mg of protein was heat-denatured and loaded onto 6% SDS-polyacrylamide gels (alpha1(I)CB6 fragment: 15% polyacrylamide gel). Protein was electroeluted and extensively dialyzed against 1 times HEPES buffered saline (10 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 0.005% Nonidet P-40, pH 7.4) to remove the SDS, followed by dialysis against 0.1 M acetic acid. Purity of each preparation was checked by reverse phase-high performance liquid chromatography (Aquapore RP-300, buffer A: 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid, buffer B: 0.098% trifluoroacetic acid in 70% CH(3)CN, gradient from 0% buffer B to 100% buffer B in 60 min).

CNBr cleavage of isolated chains was performed as described(36) . The identity of the alpha1(I)CB6 fragment has been confirmed by NH(2)-terminal sequencing.

APP Binding to the Synthetic Peptide CBP (Residues 448-480)

A synthetic peptide corresponding to residues 448-480 of APP was adsorbed to microtiter wells (0.5-5 µg/well) and incubated with 1% BSA in PBS for 1 h, I-labeled hs-APP was added (1 times 10^3 to 2 times 10^6 cpm/well) together with the competitors to be tested in PBS. After a 3-h incubation at room temperature the wells were emptied, dried, cut, and subjected to liquid scintillation counting. The mean of duplicate measurements is given which was corrected for nonspecific binding (BSA alone).

Adsorption of Protein to Microtiter Wells

Microtiter wells (Falcon, microtest III, 96 flatbottom wells, flexible) were coated with either 0.05-10 µg of collagen/well or 1% BSA in 200 µl of PBS by incubation at room temperature overnight. After a brief rinse, nonspecific binding sites in the wells were blocked for 1 h with 200 µl of 1% BSA in PBS. The wells were then rinsed with PBS and prepared for the appropriate assay.

To determine the amount of collagen adsorbed to microtiter wells, 5 µg of each collagen type were allowed to adsorb in microtiter wells overnight followed by a brief rinse. Then protein was extracted from microtiter wells with three successive rinses of 100 µl of formic acid and subjected to amino acid analysis after hydrolysis. The amount of protein adsorbed to the microtiter wells was quantified and calculated to be 50% of the amount of that was loaded.

Ligand Blot

Proteins were denatured for 5 min in SDS-sample buffer, separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to nitrocellulose filters. Nonspecific binding sites were blocked with 1% BSA in 1 times PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Incubation was done either with I-APP (2 times 10^4 cpm/ml) or S-heparin (2.5 times 10^5 cpm/ml) in hypotonic binding buffer (14 mM NaCl, 0.27 mM KCl, 0.81 mM Na(2)HPO(4) times 2H(2)O, 0.15 mM KH(2)PO(4)) for 3 h at room temperature. Filters were then washed three times for 5 min with binding buffer and exposed to Kodak XAR-5 films at -70 °C.

Iodination of APP

105-kDa rat brain full-length APP was iodinated by the chloramine-T method (IODO-BEADS, Pierce) and separated from free iodine by heparin-Sepharose chromatography.


RESULTS

Characterization of Binding of APP to Collagen

During our initial overlay studies using I-rn-APP to identify the cell surface receptor of APP that had earlier been proposed to exist(37) , we observed an APP-collagen interaction and decided to study this in more detail.

First, we tested which different collagen types interact with APP. A dot blot assay revealed that I-labeled rn-APP binding to fibrillar collagen type I and basement membrane collagen type IV (38) was saturable and specific. APP bound most efficiently to collagen type I (data not shown).

To investigate the kinetics of APP binding to collagen types I and IV and to gelatin in more detail, we used two distinct assays. Radiolabeled rn-APP was incubated in microtiter wells with immobilized collagen types I and IV at room temperature in microtiter wells or BSA as a control. APP-gelatin interaction was tested by incubating the protein with gelatin-Sepharose beads.

The binding efficiency was observed to depend on salt concentration and showed substrate specificity (binding to collagens, but not to other extracellular matrix components, such as fibronectin or vitronectin). At the specific activity used, 10% of the I-labeled rn-APP added bound to collagen type I in a dot blot assay. Binding was saturable and analyzed by using the methodology of Scatchard(39) . Assuming the presence of only one binding site on the collagen types I and IV, K(d) values in the range of 0.5 times 10M for collagen type I (Fig. 1), 4.5 times 10M for collagen type IV, and 1.5 times 10 for gelatin (data not shown) were calculated for the binding of APP to native and heat-denatured collagen (gelatin).


Figure 1: Binding curve of collagen type I with I-rn-APP. The protein-coated wells were incubated with I-rn-APP at various concentrations. The inset indicates the Scatchard plot for the binding curve.



Determination of the Collagen Binding Domain of APP

To map the putative and single collagen binding site, we used proteolytic fragments of purified fusion protein APP (Fd-APP) obtained by endoproteinase Lys-C digestion. A mixture of fragments was incubated with collagen type I that had been immobilized to microtiter plates. Proteolytic fragments of APP that specifically bound to collagen type I were extracted from microtiter wells with formic acid. Amino acid sequence analysis of the only resulting fragment revealed the sequence to commence at residue 448 of APP (Fig. 2). Other peaks were found to be caused by collagen (alpha1 and alpha2 chains of collagen type I elute between 20 and 25 min, Fig. 2) that was initially immobilized to the wells and was co-extracted with formic acid.


Figure 2: HPLC purification of a putative collagen binding peptide obtained by endoproteinase Lys-C digestion of Fd-APP encoded by exons 1-18 of APP (A) and Fd-APP encoded by exons 1-6 of APP (B). Only Fd-APP yielded the collagen binding peptide (black bar) determined by amino acid sequence analysis. Other fractions (hatched area) were revealed to contain collagen type I chains or fragments thereof.



To confirm that we identified the collagen binding site of APP, three peptides of residues 448-465, 448-480, and 471-493 (Table 1) were synthesized to perform inhibition studies. Two of these peptides were found to inhibit strongly the binding of I-hs-APP to collagen type I in a dot blot assay, with a calculated IC value of 150 nM (CBP1) and 75 nM (CBP) (Fig. 3), whereas control peptides did not have any influence at concentrations of up to 20 µg/ml. As an independent control we used iodinated NCAM purified from rat brain according to Probstmeier et al. (40) and did not observe any inhibition of NCAM binding to collagen in the presence of CBP concentrations of up to 5 µg/ml (data not shown).




Figure 3: Dose-dependent inhibition of the binding of I-hs-APP to collagen by the synthetic peptides CBP (diamonds), CBP1 (open squares), and CBP2 (filled squares). The values represent residual binding determined in dependence of the concentration of the synthetic peptides as the competing ligands in a dot blot assay.



Since APP belongs to a superfamily, we further investigated synthetic peptides that represent homologous sequences of CBP in the APLP to inhibit APP binding to collagen type I. APP-collagen type I interaction could be less effectively inhibited by synthetic peptides of mouse APLP1 (residues 445-477) (1) and human ALPL2 (2, 3) (residues 522-554). For both peptides, inhibition was found to be dose-dependent with an IC of about 1 µM (5 µg/ml) in a dot blot assay (data not shown). But mouse APLP1 and human APLP2 peptides (Table 2) were still able to inhibit binding of APP to collagen type I although with a reduced capacity by a factor of 10. A possible explanation for this is given by the secondary structure prediction for CBP/hs-APP, CBP/mm-APLP1, and CBP/hs-APLP2 according to Chou and Fasman (Table 3; (41) ) that changes from beta-structure for the NH(2) terminus of CBP/APP to alpha-structure in the same site of APLPs (Table 3).





Furthermore, direct binding of peptides CBP and CBP1 to collagen type I was proven by surface plasmon resonance (BIAcore, Pharmacia Biotech Inc.). Collagen type I was immobilized to the dextran surface of the sensorchip(21) , but the kinetics of the binding reaction could not be determined, because two independent binding events, CBP to collagen and CBP to CBP, were observed to superimpose. This led us to the conclusion that both peptides showed a strong tendency for self-aggregation and suggested that CBP could represent a binding site for APP.

If APP-APP binding could occur through the CBP sequence, APP should bind specifically to the synthetic peptide CBP. The binding was analyzed in a solid-phase assay. I-rn-APP was added to microtiter plates coated with the CBP in the absence or presence of Zn(II) and heparin. Binding of APP was found to be saturable and dependent of the amount of CBP coated to the microtiter plate (Fig. 4A). A dose-dependent inhibition of the binding of I-hs-APP to CBP by TP-APP was observed in nanomolar concentrations (Fig. 4B).


Figure 4: Modulation of I-rn-APP binding to the CBP peptide. No inhibitor (diamonds), heparin (open squares), and Zn(II) (filled triangles) were added at concentrations of 100 µM ZnCl(2) and 10 µg/ml heparin. APP binding to CBP was found to be inhibited by heparin and the divalent metal ions Zn(II) and Cu(II) in a concentration-dependent manner (A and C). A dose-dependent inhibition of the binding of I-hs-APP to CBP by recombinant APP was observed in nanomolar concentrations (B). Inhibition of I-hs-APP binding to CBP yielded for instance 70% at 1 µM Zn(II), 85% at 25 µM, and 90% at 50 µM Zn(II), but Ni(II), Co(II), and Fe(III) were unable to inhibit (C).



The inhibition of binding was also found to be concentration-dependent for Zn(II) and Cu(II) but not for other divalent ions such as Fe(II), Co(II), and Ni(II) (Fig. 4C). Zinc(II) and copper(II) reduced binding to 10% (Zn(II)) and 20% (Cu(II)) at 50 µM, 15% (Zn(II)) and 35% (Cu(II)) at 25 µM, 30% (Zn(II)) and 50% (Cu(II)) at 1 µM concentrations. These values fall within the physiological Zn(II) and Cu(II) concentrations(42, 43) .

When we tested the effect of Zn(II) (27, 30, 44) on binding of I-hs-APP to collagen type I, it did not have any effect on APP collagen type I binding up to concentrations of 100 µM Zn(II) (data not shown), exceeding the saturating concentration of Zn(II) binding to APP(27) .

Thus, under our experimental in vitro conditions, APP binding to collagen type I and CBP binding of APP are two mutually exclusive events of which only the binding of APP to CBP is regulated by the divalent metal ions Zn(II) and Cu(II) that both are ligands of APP(27, 28) .

Since it has previously been reported that APP-collagen interaction is mediated by a heparin bridge mechanism(23) , we investigated APP collagen type I binding in the presence of heparin and chondroitin sulfate.

APP Binding to Collagen Type I Is Inhibited by Heparin

When collagen type I immobilized on plastic was incubated with I-APP together with increasing amounts of heparin or chondroitin sulfate, binding was inhibited in a concentration-dependent manner with an IC in the range of 0.1-1.0 µg/ml (Fig. 5). Although both components are able to interact with glycosaminoglycans(45) , it was assumed that this effect was due to the binding of heparin and chondroitin sulfate to collagen type I (Table 4), because chondroitin sulfate does not bind to APP (30) . Radioiodinated APP was saturated with heparin and separated from unbound, free heparin by desalting. It was found to bind to collagen type I, but collagen preincubated in a dot blot assay with heparin did not bind any longer to APP. In summary, these results show that heparin bound to collagen, but not bound to APP, inhibits the interaction between APP and collagen in a concentration-dependent manner (Table 4, Fig. 5).


Figure 5: Dose-dependent inhibition of the binding of I-rn-APP to collagen by heparin and chondroitin sulfate. The binding to collagen type I immobilized on a microtiter well was determined in the presence of increasing concentrations of heparin and chondroitin sulfate and found to be concentration-dependent.





Determination of the APP Binding Domain of Collagen

To further examine this, we decided to investigate whether the high affinity heparin binding site of type I collagen that has been localized in the COOH-terminal CB fragment of the molecule (46) is the critical site responsible for the binding of APP to type I collagen. We examined the abilities of collagen type I to bind heparin by affinity chromatography and performed binding studies with S-heparin and I-rn-APP. Since the binding of collagen to heparin-Sepharose is necessary but not sufficient to fulfil the criteria of heparin binding, CB fragments of collagen type I eluting at 600 mM NaCl from heparin-Sepharose were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose filters, and incubated with S-heparin. Heparin binding was found in the covalently linked, partially digested dimers or trimers of the alpha-chains, the alpha1(I)CB8 and the alpha1(I)CB6 fragments (Fig. 6, A and B).


Figure 6: The alpha1(I)CB6 peptide binds S-heparin and I-rn-APP. The resulting peptides of CNBr digestion of alpha1(I) and alpha2(I) chains were fractionated by heparin-Sepharose chromatography. Fractions eluting at 600 mM NaCl were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (gradient from 10 to 15% polyacrylamide) and stained with Coomassie (A) or incubated with S-heparin after blotting to nitrocellulose (B). Partially digested dimers and trimers of the alpha-chains, the alpha1(I)CB8, and the alpha1(I)CB6 fragment (arrow) bind S-heparin. CNBr fragments of alpha1(I) and alpha2(I) chains were separated by SDS-PAGE and incubated with I-rn-APP after blotting to nitrocellulose. Binding was found to the alpha1(I)CB6 fragment as the only CNBr fragment (C) indicated by the arrow. The asterisk indicates incompletely digested and/or covalently cross-linked dimers of the alpha-chains.



In an overlay assay I-rn-APP binding to collagen type I was observed to partially digested dimers or trimers of the alpha-chains and to the alpha1(I)CB6 fragment as the only CNBr fragment showing up at an apparent molecular mass of 25 kDa (Fig. 6C). To determine the identity of this fragment, it was purified from SDS gels and characterized by amino acid sequence analysis. Higher bands represent uncomplete digested and/or covalently cross-linked dimers of the alpha-chains. The results presented above show that the alpha1(I)CB6 fragment of collagen type I contains binding sites for both APP and the glycosaminoglycan heparin.

Since it has been indicated that the triple helical structure of collagen is important for the interaction with heparin(46) , the alpha1 and alpha2 collagen chains and the CNBr fragment alpha1(I)CB6 were separated by SDS-PAGE, electroeluted, and assayed separately in a dot blot apparatus by incubation with I-rn-APP. Binding was strongest to the alpha1 chain of collagen type I, less binding was observed to the alpha1CB6 fragment, and no specific binding could be observed to the alpha2 chain of collagen type I (Fig. 7, A and B). This result is consistent with binding studies for which I-rn-APP and gelatin-Sepharose affinity chromatography indicated that APP recognizes heat-denatured collagen as well as triple-helical fibrillar collagen. Apparently, the APP binding site in the alpha1CB6 fragment has less tight specificity, probably due to the change of conformation of surrounding residues.


Figure 7: Binding of I-APP to collagen type I in a dot blot assay. No specific binding to the alpha2(I) chain of collagen could be observed (0% of total was specific) (A). Saturable and specific binding was found to the alpha1(I) chain (54% of total was specific) (A), collagen type I (66% of total was specific), and the CNBr fragment alpha1(I)CB6 (70% of total was specific) (B). The total amount of protein immobilized to nitrocellulose was determined by amino acid analysis. Numbering of cyanogen bromide peptides (CB) of the alpha1 chain of collagen type I according to Miller et al.(71) and Piez et al.(72) .



In conclusion, our observations reveal a mechanism of APP binding to collagen that is regulated by glycosaminoglycans that compete with APP for an overlapping binding site of the alpha1 CB6 fragment of collagen. Although both components can interact with glycosaminoglycans(21, 47) , our assay system allowed us to determine that inhibition of APP binding to collagen by heparin occurred on the collagen side by binding of heparin to collagen.


DISCUSSION

Our results show that APP can interact with collagen types I and IV, and this interaction can be influenced by glycosaminoglycans. The binding of APP to collagen shows substrate specificity, is saturable, and Scatchard plot analysis suggests one binding site for collagen type I. Substantially reduced binding to denatured collagen is not observed, a finding that is in common with fibronectin binding to collagens (48) .

In this study we concentrated on collagen type I that showed the highest affinity of those that were tested. The affinity is in good agreement with the K(d) values for the binding of J1 glycoproteins and NCAM to collagens(40, 49) .

Collagen binding of APP was mapped to the carbohydrate domain of APP corresponding to amino acid residues 448-465, not including the carbohydrate attachment site at asparagine in position 467 (Table 1). The sequence of peptide CBP1 is conserved in rat, mouse, and human APP. A search in the ``Swiss-Prot'' Protein Data Bank did not reveal any significant homology to the CBP1 sequence in the known collagen-binding proteins such as fibronectin(50) , heat shock protein HSP47(51) , or bovine propolypeptide of von Willebrand factor (52) at the level of primary structure.

The inhibitory effect exerted through peptides CBP and CBP1 on APP collagen binding must be taken as an indication. Direct binding of these synthetic peptides to collagen did occur, but could not be measured in terms of K(d) values, because the tendency for self-aggregation of CBP and CBP1 observed by surface plasmon resonance as an undirected binding interfered with those measurements. The sequence of CBP is predicted to adopt a beta-strand conformation followed by the beginning of a beta-turn structure at residue 466, whereas CBP derived from APLP1 and APLP2 may adopt an alpha-helical structure. This might explain why sequences corresponding to the collagen binding site of other members of the APP gene family were still able to inhibit binding, but the capacity to compete was drastically reduced in comparison with APP-CBP binding by more than a factor of 10. Additionally, peptides containing a beta-strand followed by a beta-turn are reported to be capable of undergoing isologous interaction in an antiparallel manner(53) . For instance the homophilic binding site of the cell adhesion molecule gp80 of Dictyostelium discoideum has been mapped to an octapeptide sequence YKLNVNDS in the NH(2)-terminal globular domain (53, 54) and is known to mediate cell-cell adhesion via homophilic interaction. It is remarkable that the beta-turn structure in gp80 is also induced by a potential glycosylation attachment sequence NXS(55) , as is the case for the CBP sequence of APP. Although APP contains at this position the only N-linked carbohydrate chain(56, 57) , according to our experiments it seems unlikely that the carbohydrate moiety is a regulator of collagen/gelatin binding activity, because deglycosylated rat brain APP retained the ability to bind to collagen as well as fusion proteins of APP expressed in bacteria. But it still remains possible that the carbohydrate moiety induces a certain conformation of APP.

The observed self-aggregation of CBP led us to postulate the binding of radiolabeled rat brain APP to CBP that we analyzed in a solid-phase binding assay. We found binding to be saturable and recombinant APP, Zn(II), and heparin to be able to inhibit. This provides evidence for APP-APP binding involving the AAQIRSQVMTHLRVIYER sequence. We were previously able to show that an allosteric effect on APP binding to heparin is caused by Zn(II)(21) , but not by other divalent ions. Moreover, we observed that the electrophoretic mobility of CBP aggregates in capillary electrophoresis is dependent on the salt concentration. Therefore we conclude that binding of APP to CBP is driven by ionic forces, and separately from this, we propose a regulation by the divalent ions Zn(II) and Cu(II). We had shown earlier, in the case of Cu(II), that the modulation is likely due to the formation of APP aggregates and thus inhibiting the binding to the peptide on the solid support(28) .

Our assay system allowed us to discern that inhibition of APP binding to collagen type I occurs on the APP or the collagen side, although both components can interact with glycosaminoglycans(47, 58) . We could demonstrate that APP interacts directly with the alpha1(I)CB6 fragment of collagen type I (Fig. 6C and Fig. 7B), independent from integrin-mediated adhesion. Integrins bind to alpha1(I)CB3 (integrin (alpha2beta1)) and alpha1(I)CB8 (integrin (alpha1beta1)) fragments of collagen(59, 60) .

This interaction is regulated by heparin, and therefore both molecules probably share the same binding site on collagen. Heparin that is believed to act in vivo as a specific regulator of the structure and function of basement membranes(61) , or local variation in the concentration of heparin-like macromolecules, might be crucial for the interaction of APP and collagens in vivo.

A functional collagen binding site of APP is of great importance, since transmembrane APP could serve directly as a cell adhesion molecule, and the secreted forms might be involved in the regulation of cell interactions. In the periphery, APP might act as a transmembrane-signaling molecule. For instance platelets are activated by agonists such as thrombin and collagen (14, 15, 31) followed by the secretion of APP, which is an abundant platelet alpha-granule protein. It should be mentioned that platelets contain 20-50-fold higher concentrations of Zn(II) than plasma, and upon activation, platelets release Zn(II) to the external platelet surface(62) . At the microenvironment of the activated platelet in higher local concentrations, Zn(II) could shift the properties of APP into a different site of action, i.e. the regulation of the coagulation cascade by inhibiting factor XIa(63) .

Collagen can also act as an effective substrate for neurite outgrowth from peripheral neurons and also promote outgrowth from at least some central neurons(64) . An involvement of APP in those processes was earlier suggested by Breen et al.(23) who found cell binding to a collagen substrate (neuron-neuron and neuron-glia binding) inhibited by antibodies against the extracellular portion of APP. Neuronal regeneration is associated with the expression of extracellular matrix proteins(65, 66) . A direct interaction of mature transmembrane APP with components of the extracellular matrix might reflect the importance of APP as a neuronal cell adhesion molecule. The interaction of APP with extracellular matrix molecules may turn out to have a role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. Proteoglycans appear to be increased in the vicinity of betaA4 amyloid plaque deposition(67, 68) . Collagen-like molecules such as the A12 form of acetylcholinesterase are also increased in the areas of amyloid. Alterations in the affinity of APP for extracellular matrix molecules by zinc may also be relevant to Alzheimer's disease(21, 27) .

The normal processing of APP in the central nervous system may therefore be affected by APP-matrix interactions and deserves closer scrutiny.


FOOTNOTES

*
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (through Grant SFB 317) and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie of Germany. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 49-6221-56-68-49; Fax: 49-6221-56-58-91; bsa784{at}sun0.urz.uni-heidelberg.deberg.de.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: APP, amyloid protein precursor; APPs, alpha-secretase cleaved form of APP; hs-APP, APP purified from human brain; rn-APP, APP purified from rat brain; betaA4, betaA4 amyloid protein; APLP, amyloid precursor like protein; BSA, bovine serum albumin; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; CBP, collagen-binding peptide; NCAM, neural cell adhesion molecule.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to Andrea Schlicksupp and Santosh Pinto for technical assistance and thank Konrad Beyreuther for critically reading the manuscript.


REFERENCES

  1. Wasco, W., Bupp, K., Magendantz, M., Gusella, J. F., Tanzi, R. E., and Solomon, F. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 10758-10762 [Abstract]
  2. Wasco, W., Gurubhagavatula, S., Dparadis, M., Romano, D. M., Sisodia, S. S., Hyman, B. T., Neve, R. L., and Tanzi, R. E. (1993) Nature Genet 5, 95-100 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Sprecher, C. A., Grant, F. J., Grimm, G., O'Hara, P. J., Norris, F., Norris, K., and Foster, D. C. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 4481-4486 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Müller-Hill, B., and Beyreuther, K. (1989) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 58, 287-307 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Selkoe, D. J. (1994) Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 17, 489-517 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Goate, A., Chartier-Harlin, M.-C., Mullan, M., Brown, J., Crawford, F., Fidani, L., Giuffra, L., Haynes, A., Irving, N., James, L., Mant, R., Newton, P., Rooke, K., Roques, P., Talbot, C., Pericak-Vance, M., Roses, A., Rossor, M., Owen, M., and Hardy, J. (1991) Nature 349, 704-706 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Hendriks, L., van Duijn, C. M., Cras, P., Cruts, M., Van Hul, W., van Harskamp, F., Warren, A., McInnis, M. G., Antonarakis, S. E., Martin, J. J., Hofman, A., and VanBroeckhoven, C. (1992) Nature Genet. 1, 218-221 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Levy, E., Carman, M. D., Fernandez, M. I., Power, M. D., Lieberburg, I., van, D. S., Bots, G. T., Luyendijk, W., and Frangione, B. (1990) Science 248, 1124-1126 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Levy-Lahad, E., Wasco, W., Poorkaj, P., Romano, D. M., Oshima, J., Pettingell, W. H., Yu, C., Jondro, P. D., Schmidt, S. D., Wang, K., Crowley, A. C., Fu, Y.-H., Guenette, S. Y., Galas, D., Nemens, E., Wijsman, E. M., Bird, T. D., Schellenberg, G. D., and Tanzi, R. E. (1995) Science 269, 973-977 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Corder, E. H., Saunders, A. M., Strittmatter, W. J., Schmechel, D. E., Gaskell, P. C., Small, G. W., Roses, A. D., Haines, J. L., and Pericak-Vance, M. A. (1993) Science 261, 921-923 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Sherrington, R., Rogaev, E. I., Liang, Y., Rogaeva, E. A., Levesque, G., Ikeda, M., Chi, H., Lin, C., Li, G., Holman, K., Tsuda, T., Mar, L., Foncin, J. F., Bruni, A. C., Montesi, M. P., Sorbi, S., Rainero, I., Pinessi, L., Nee, L., Chumakov, I., Pollen, D., Brookes, A., Sanseau, P., Polinsky, R. J., Wasco, W., Dasilva, H. A. R., Haines, J. L., Pericak-Vance, M. A., Tanzi, R. E., Roses, A. D., Fraser, P. E., Rommens, J. M., and St. George-Hyslop, P. H. (1995) Nature 375, 754-760 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Oltersdorf, T., Fritz, L. C., Schenk, D. B., Lieberburg, I., Johnson-Wood, K., Beattie, E. C., Ward, P. J., Blacher, R. W., Dovey, H. F., and Sinha, S. (1989) Nature 341, 144-147 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Kounnas, M. Z., Moir, R. D., Rebeck, G. W., Bush, A. I., Argraves, W. S., Tanzi, R. E., Hyman, B. T., and Strickland, D. K. (1995) Cell 82, 331-340 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Smith, R. P., Higuchi, D. A., and Broze, G. J. (1990) Science 248, 1126-1128 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Van Nostrand, W. E., Schmaier, A. H., Farrow, J. S., and Cunningham, D. D. (1990) Science 248, 745-748 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Roch, J. M., Shapiro, I. P., Sundsmo, M. P., Otero, D. A., Refolo, L. M., Robakis, N. K., and Saitoh, T. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 2214-2221 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Milward, E. A., Papadopoulos, R., Fuller, S. J., Moir, R. D., Small, D., Beyreuther, K., and Masters, C. L. (1992) Neuron 9, 129-137 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Saitoh, T., Sundsmo, M., Roch, J. M., Kimura, N., Cole, G., Schubert, D., Oltersdorf, T., and Schenk, D. B. (1989) Cell 58, 615-622 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Schubert, D., LaCorbiere, M., Saitoh, T., and Cole, G. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 2066-2069 [Abstract]
  20. Multhaup, G., Bush, A. I., Pollwein, P., Masters, C. L., and Beyreuther, K. (1992) J. Protein Chem. 11, 398-399
  21. Multhaup, G. (1994) Biochimie (Paris) 76, 304-311
  22. Klier, F. G., Cole, G., Stallcup, W., and Schubert, D. (1990) Brain Res. 515, 336-342 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Breen, K. C., Bruce, M., and Anderton, B. H. (1991) J. Neurosci. Res. 28, 90-100 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Kibbey, M. C., Jucker, M., Weeks, B. S., Neve, R. L., Van, N. W., and Kleinman, H. K. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 10150-10153 [Abstract]
  25. Narindrasorasak, S., Lowery, D. E., Altman, R. A., Gonzalez-DeWhitt, P., Greenberg, B. D., and Kisilevsky, R. (1992) Lab. Invest. 67, 643-652 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Small, D. H., Nurcombe, V., Reed, G., Clarris, H., Moir, R., Beyreuther, K., and Masters, C. L. (1994) J. Neurosci. 14, 2117-2127 [Abstract]
  27. Bush, A. I., Multhaup, G., Moir, R. D., Williamson, T. G., Small, D. H., Rumble, B., Pollwein, P., Beyreuther, K., and Masters, C. L. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 16109-16112 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Hesse, L., Beher, D., Masters, C. L., and Multhaup, G. (1994) FEBS Lett. 349, 109-116 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Bush, A. I., Pettingell, W. H., Jr., DeParadis, M., Tanzi, R. E., and Wasco, W. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 26618-26621 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Multhaup, G., Bush, A. I., Pollwein, P., and Masters, C. L. (1994) FEBS Lett. 355, 151-154 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Bush, A. I., Martins, R. N., Rumble, B., Moir, R., Fuller, S., Milward, E., Currie, J., Ames, D., Weidemann, A., Fischer, P., Multhaup, G., Beyreuther, K., and Masters, C. L. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 15977-15983 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Santoro, S. A. (1986) Cell 46, 913-920 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Barany, G., and Merrifield, B. (1981) The Peptides (Gross, E., and Meienhofer, J., eds) Vol. 2, Academic Press, Inc., New York
  34. Kunkel, T. A. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 488-492 [Abstract]
  35. Weidemann, A., König, G., Bunke, D., Fischer, P., Salbaum, J. M., Masters, C. L., and Beyreuther, K. (1989) Cell 57, 115-126 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Gross, E., and Witkop, B. (1961) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 83, 1510-1511
  37. Kang, J., Lemaire, H. G., Unterbeck, A., Salbaum, J. M., Masters, C. L., Grzeschik, K. H., Multhaup, G., Beyreuther, K., and Müller-Hill, B. (1987) Nature 325, 733-736 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Vuorio, E., and deCrombrugghe, B. (1990) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 59, 837-872 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Scatchard, G. (1949) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 51, 660-672
  40. Probstmeier, R., Kühn, K., and Schachner, M. (1989) J. Neurochem. 53, 1794-1801 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Chou, P. Y., and Fasman, G. D. (1978) Adv. Enzymol. 47, 45-148 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Falchuk, K. H. (1987) in Principles of Internal Medicine (Braunwald, E., Isselbacher, K. J., Petersdorf, R. G., Wilson, J. D., Martin, J. B., and Fauci, A. S., eds) pp. 418-421, McGraw-Hill, New York
  43. Jackson, M. J. (1989) Zinc in Human Biology (Mills, C. F., ed) Springer- Verlag, London
  44. Multhaup, G., Masters, C. L., and Beyreuther, K. (1993) Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler 374, 1-8 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Lindahl, U., Höök, M., Kjellen, L., Johansson, S., and Robinson, J. (1984) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 53, 847-869 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Keller, K. M., Keller, J. M., and Kühn, K. (1986) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 882, 1-5 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Lindahl, U., and Höök, M. (1978) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 47, 385-417 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Ruoshlahti, E., Hayman, E. G., Pierschbacher, M., and Engvall, E. (1982) Methods Enzymol. 82, 803-831 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Faissner, A., Kruse, J., Kühn, K., and Schachner, M. (1990) J. Neurochem. 54, 1004-1015 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Ingham, K. C., Brew, S. A., and Migliorini, M. M. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 16977-16980 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Hirayoshi, K., Kudo, H., Takechi, H., Nakai, A., Iwamatsu, A., Yamada, K. M., and Nagata, K. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 4036-4044 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  52. Takagi, J., Asai, H., and Saito, Y. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 8530-8534 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  53. Kamboj, R. K., Gariepy, J., and Siu, C. H. (1989) Cell 59, 615-625 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  54. Kamboj, R. K., Wong, L. M., Lam, T. Y., and Siu, C. H. (1988) J. Cell Biol. 107, 1835-1843 [Abstract]
  55. Marshall, R. D. (1974) Biochem. Soc. Symp. 40, 17-26 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. Dyrks, T., Weidemann, A., Multhaup, G., Salbaum, J. M., Lemaire, H. G., Kang, J., Müller-Hill, B., Masters, C. L., and Beyreuther, K. (1988) EMBO J. 7, 949-957 [Abstract]
  57. Pahlsson, P., Shakin, E. S., and Spitalnik, S. L. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 189, 1667-1673 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  58. Cole, G. J., and Glaser, L. (1986) J. Cell Biol. 100, 403-412
  59. Gullberg, D., Gehlsen, K. R., Turner, D. C., Ahlen, K., Zijenah, L. S., Barnes, M. J., and Rubin, K. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 3865-3873 [Abstract]
  60. Staatz, W. D., Walsh, J. J., Pexton, T., and Santoro, S. A. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 4778-4781 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Yurchenco, P. D., Cheng, Y. S., and Schittny, J. C. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 3981-3991 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Aktulga, A., and Ulatin, O. N. (1975) in Excerpta Medica (Aktulga, A., ed) pp. 185-191, Amsterdam
  63. Wagner, S. L., Siegel, R. S., Vedvick, T. S., Raschke, W. C., and Van, N. W. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 186, 1138-1145 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  64. Sanes, J. R. (1989) Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 12, 491-516 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  65. Liesi, P., Kaakkola, S., Dahl, D., and Vaheri, A. (1984) EMBO J. 3, 683-686 [Abstract]
  66. Lefcort, F., Venstrom, K., McDonald, J. A., and Reichardt, L. F. (1992) Development (Camb.) 116, 767-82
  67. Snow, A. D., Mar, H., Nochlin, D., Kresse, H., and Wight, T. N. (1992) J. Histochem. Cytochem. 40, 105-113 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Perlmutter, L. S., Chui, H. C., Saperia, D., and Athanikar, J. (1990) Brain Res. 508, 13-19 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  69. Von der Kammer, H., Hanes, J., Klaudiny, J., and Scheit, K. H. (1994) DNA Cell Biol. 13, 1137-1143 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  70. Vidal, F., Blangy, A., Rassoulzadegan, M., and Cuzin, F. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 189, 1336-1341 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  71. Miller, E. J., Lane, J. M., and Piez, K. A. (1969) Biochemistry 8, 30-39 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  72. Piez, K. A., Miller, E. J., Lane, J. M., and Butler, W. T. (1969) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 37, 801-805 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.