©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Lipoprotein Association of Human Apolipoprotein E/A-I Chimeras
EXPRESSION IN TRANSFECTED HEPATOMA CELLS (*)

(Received for publication, August 24, 1995; and in revised form, December 5, 1995)

Beth L. Thurberg (1)(§) Catherine A. Reardon (1) Godfrey S. Getz (1) (2) (3)

From the  (1)Departments of Pathology, (2)Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, and (3)Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

Both apolipoprotein (apo) E and apoA-I are associated with lipoproteins, although with different particle classes. ApoE is associated with very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) and with the larger high density lipoprotein (HDL) subspecies, while apoA-I is found predominantly in association with most HDL subclasses. The genes encoding these proteins have a similar overall structure with the nucleotide sequences of the third and fourth exons coding for the mature protein. In an effort to understand the difference in lipoprotein association patterns of these two apoproteins, we have constructed and expressed chimeric apoproteins using cDNAs in which the third (n) and fourth (c) exons of human apoE and apoA-I are exchanged. McArdle rat hepatoma cells (McA-RH7777), which secrete VLDL- and HDL-like particles, were stably transfected with these cDNAs, and the cDNAs for human apoE and human apoA-I. Single spin NaBr gradient fractions of lipoprotein deficient serum-treated cell medium from transfected McA-RH7777 cells were analyzed. The distributions of transfected human apoE and apoA-I and endogenous rat apoE and apoA-I were compared with those of the chimeras. Among HDL subspecies, human apoE expressed by these cells is associated with particles of density 1.108 g/ml. Similarly, chimera apoA-InEc (exon 3 of apoA-I and exon 4 of apoE) is found in particles of density 1.111 g/ml. Human apoA-I, however, distributes in a broader range of particles with peak densities of 1.111 g/ml and 1.164 g/ml. The distribution of the complementary chimera, apoEnA-Ic, follows this same pattern, with peak particle densities of 1.098 and 1.137 g/ml. This is in contrast to the narrow distributions of endogenous rat apoE and apoA-I, which were found in particles of density 1.099 and 1.089 g/ml, respectively. When metabolically labeled medium was fractionated via gel filtration column chromatography, apoA-InEc was found to associate with the VLDL fractions; apoEnA-Ic was absent from these same fractions. These results suggest that the fourth exon largely determines the distinctive lipoprotein distribution patterns of these two human apoproteins and that the human apoA-I fourth exon sequence may account for the polydisperse HDL pattern as observed by others in transgenic mice expressing human apoA-I.


INTRODUCTION

The soluble apolipoproteins appear to have evolved from a common ancestral apoprotein, apoC-I, (^1)through whole-gene duplications, intragenic duplications, and intragenic deletions(1) . The set of current soluble apoproteins (apoA-I, apoA-II, apoA-IV, apoC-I, apoC-II, apoC-III, and apoE) have maintained similar overall gene structures. The first exon encodes the 5`-untranslated region, the second exon encodes most of the signal peptide, the third exon encodes the rest of the signal peptide and the amino terminus of the mature protein, and the fourth exon encodes the remainder of the mature protein as well as the 3`-untranslated region. In the case of apoA-IV, the first exon fulfills the role of exons one and two in the other six apoproteins. In all cases, the last two exons encode the mature plasma protein. The last exon of all the soluble apoprotein genes codes for a variable number of 11 or 22-amino acid repeats. These repeats are capable of forming amphipathic alpha helical secondary structures that in vitro have been shown to be important for binding to phospholipid vesicles (2) and lipoproteins(3) . Despite the similar gene structure and the presence of common secondary structure, these apoproteins all have unique roles in lipoprotein metabolism and distinct lipoprotein distribution patterns(4) .

Each apolipoprotein associates with a specific class or classes of lipoprotein particles possessing distinct compositional and size differences. It is this remarkable specificity that determines the function and metabolic fate of each class of lipoprotein particles. The present study focuses on apoE and apoA-I, two apoproteins that associate with different classes of lipoprotein particles. It is well known that apoE associates with VLDL and the larger classes of HDL, such as HDL and HDL(1), whereas apoA-I associates predominantly with the smaller HDL subspecies, HDL(2) and HDL(3)(5) . We have constructed chimeric apoproteins from these two human apoproteins in order to determine which domains are responsible for their lipoprotein particle segregation patterns. We examined the association of the apoproteins with nascent hepatic lipoproteins secreted from the McA-RH7777 rat hepatoma cell line transfected with expression vectors containing the chimeric cDNAs. These cells are capable of vigorous triglyceride and apolipoprotein production, and their apolipoproteins are secreted as lipidated particles resembling VLDL and HDL of rat plasma(6) . Electron microscopy reveals that these particles are primarily spherical in shape(7) . Because this is a rat cell line, we were able to differentiate between endogenous and transfected apoproteins using species-specific antibodies. Therefore, we felt that these cells would provide a good model in which to study the lipoprotein class targeting of human apoE, human apoA-I, and chimeric proteins containing sequences of each.

Gilbert (8) has suggested that the division of genes into exons separated by introns may correspond to coding regions for polypeptides with ``related or differing functions''(8) . Several well known proteins exhibit this kind of gene organization such as the LDL receptor(9) , immunoglobulin genes(10) , and the chick pyruvate kinase gene(11) . This evidence makes our chimeric approach a logical one. By exchanging homologous exonic regions between structurally related but functionally different apoproteins, we hoped to begin to identify those regions of apoE and apoA-I responsible for their specific lipoprotein class distribution. Chimeric apoproteins were expressed by creating cDNAs in which the corresponding third and fourth exon regions of human apoE and apoA-I were exchanged. This approach allows the isolation and study of a specific apoprotein domain in the context of an overall apoprotein structure.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

The rat hepatoma cell line McA-RH7777 (ATCC CRL 1601) was obtained from American Type Culture Collection, MD. The isotopes [S]dATP (370 MBq/ml), [alpha-P]dCTP (740 MBq/ml), [P]orthophosphate (carrier-free, 370 MBq/ml), I-protein A (1.1 GBq/mg), as well as the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) Western blotting detection kit and ECL random priming kit, were obtained from Amersham Corp. TransS-label(TM) (>600Ci/mmol) was obtained from ICN Biomedicals, Inc. (Irvine, CA). Super reverse transcriptase was obtained from Life Technologies, Inc., and all restriction enzymes and DNA modifying reagents were obtained from New England Biolabs, Inc. (Beverly, MA.). Biogel A-5m chromatography beads were obtained from Bio-Rad. SeaPlaque-agarose was obtained from FMC BioProducts (Rockland, ME). All tissue culture reagents and Immuno-Precipitin (formalin-fixed Staph A cells) were obtained from Life Technologies, Inc. Immobilon-P transfer membranes were obtained from Millipore Corp. (Bedford, MA.). 4-30% nondenaturing gradients gels were purchased from David Rainwater (Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research, San Antonio, TX). The expression vector pCMV4 was a gift from David Russell (University of Texas, Dallas, TX). The rabbit anti-human apoE and anti-baboon apoA-I antisera were prepared according to the method of Hay and Getz(12) . The rabbit anti-human apoA-I antiserum was kindly provided by Dr. Vi Cabana (University of Chicago, IL).

Preparation of cDNA for apoEnA-Ic

Unless otherwise stated, standard molecular biological methods are those outlined previously(13) . To prepare the cDNA for apoEnA-Ic, the fourth exon segment of an apoA-I cDNA plasmid, pAI-101, supplied by J. Breslow (Rockefeller University, New York), was isolated as a BalI-HpaII 715-base pair fragment encoding amino acids 40-243 of human apoA-I plus 24 base pairs of 3`-untranslated region. The HpaII site was made blunt-ended using the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase. This blunt-ended piece was then subcloned into the SmaI site of the pUC19 polylinker region, and the resultant colonies were screened for plasmids in which the 5`-end of the cDNA was oriented near the BamHI site of the pUC19 polylinker region (pUC19-AIc; see Fig. 1A).


Figure 1: A, construction of the pCMV4-EnA-Ic expression vector; B, construction of the pCMV4-A-InEc expression vector. The chimeric cDNAs were constructed using standard ligation and mutagenesis protocols as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' ApoE sequences are shown in black. ApoA-I sequences are shown in stripes.



Next, the apoE signal peptide region and third exon were isolated from the cDNA plasmid pHEBB6, which contains the BalI-HinfI fragment of the human apoE cDNA pE386 (obtained from J. Breslow, Rockefeller University, New York) subcloned into the BamHI site of pUC19. The plasmid was digested with SacII (nucleotide 469), producing a 3` overhang that was blunted with mung bean nuclease. BamHI linkers were added, and the plasmid was digested with BamHI. The 428-base pair fragment containing the apoE signal peptide and N terminus was subcloned into the BamHI site of the pUC19-A-Ic plasmid. The resulting plasmid, pUC19-EnA-Ic parent, was selected for proper orientation of the apoE fragment, and is shown in Fig. 1A. In order to remove the nucleotides in pUC19-EnA-Ic parent between the codons for arginine 61 in apoE and leucine 44 in apoA-I, the 1100-base pair HindIII-EcoRI fragment in pUC19-EnA-Ic was subcloned into the m13mp18 polylinker region at the corresponding sites. All 268 nucleotides between the codon for arginine 61 of apoE and the codon for leucine 44 of apoA-I were deleted by oligonucleotide site-directed mutagenesis in order to bring the two exons side by side and in frame. Oligonucleotide site-directed mutagenesis was performed using the T-7 Gen in vitro mutagenesis system, based on the work by Vandeyar(14) . Successful mutagenesis was determined by analytical restriction endonuclease digestions, and dideoxynucleotide sequencing of this central region using S-dATP (>600Ci/mmol) and an oligonucleotide corresponding to apoprotein sequences 40-60 nucleotides upstream from the site of mutagenesis.

The final 890-base pair cDNA chimeric was subcloned into the HindIII-XbaI site of pCMV4(15) , downstream of the human cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter and a translational enhancer from the alfalfa virus 4 RNA.

Preparation of cDNA for ApoA-InEc

For the formation of the second chimera, apoA-InEc, reverse transcription of total HepG2 (16) RNA and subsequent polymerase chain reaction were performed to isolate the cDNA region encoding the signal peptide, the propeptide and the third exon-encoded amino acids of apoA-I. The oligonucleotide used at the 5` end of the apoA-I piece contained the following sequence: 5`ACATCCGTCGACTCTAGAGGCCCTTCAGGATGAAAGCTGCGGTGCTGACC. It was designed to include the apoA-I 5`-consensus region necessary for proper translation initiation (17) and contained a SalI restriction site at the 5`-end. The 3`-oligonucleotide for this region contained a BamHI site at the 3`-end and had the following sequence: 5` ACATCCGAATTCGGATCCCAGCTGTTTTCCCAAGGCGGA. This 249-base pair polymerase chain reaction fragment was subcloned upstream of a full-length apoE cDNA in pUC19 (pHEA1) at the SalI/BamHI sites in the polylinker region. This generated pUC19-A-InEc parent (Fig. 1B). To remove nucleotides between the codons for asparagine 43 of apoA-I and alanine 62 of apoE, the 1349-base pair SalI/EcoRI fragment of pUC19-A-InEc parent was subcloned into the polylinker region of m13mp18 at SalI/EcoRI, and site-directed mutagenesis was performed as described above. The final 1070-base pair chimeric cDNA was subcloned into the eukaryotic expression vector pCMV4 at the XbaI/SmaI sites.

Preparation of cDNA for Human ApoA-I

A full-length apoA-I cDNA was obtained by polymerase chain reaction, using pSV2-preproA-I (a generous gift from Dr. Eric Rassart at the Universite de Montreal) as a template. The same 5`-oligonucleotide described above was used with the following 3`-oligonucleotide containing an XbaI restriction site: 5`-ACATCCGTCGACTCTAGAGGGGCGGCGGCGGGCGCCTCACTGGGTGTTGAGCTT. This created an 870-base pair cDNA, which was subcloned directly into the XbaI site of pCMV4. The pCMV4-huapoE vector, containing a full-length human apoE cDNA, was prepared as described. (^2)

Stable Cell Lines

McA-RH7777 rat hepatoma cells were stably transfected with the recombinant expression vectors and pSV2-neo using the calcium phosphate co-precipitation method described by Graham and van der Eb(19) . Stable transfectants were selected using the neomycin analogue G418 (400 µg/ml), and the media of the individual colonies were screened for the presence of the chimeric proteins by metabolic labeling and immunoprecipitation. Stable cells lines were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 4500 g/liter D-glucose, 10% horse serum, 10% bovine fetal calf serum, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1% glutamine and 200 µg/ml of G418. All cell lines were maintained for no more than 3 months, during which time no changes in human apoprotein expression levels of transfected cells were observed.

Preparation of Lipoprotein-deficient Serum (LPDS)

Lipoproteins were removed from fetal bovine serum by centrifugation in NaBr, d 1.25 g/ml, twice. The bottom two-thirds of the serum was removed and dialyzed extensively against phosphate-buffered saline. Protein concentration was determined by Lowry assay (20) using bovine serum albumin as a standard. LPDS was used in media at a final concentration of 2.5 mg/ml (10%).

Cell Culture Protocol

Cells were seeded at 1.5 times 10^6 cells/T25 flask. After 24 h, the medium was removed, and the cells were washed 3 times with sterile phosphate-buffered saline and incubated with 3 ml of DMEM/high glucose, 10% LPDS (2.5 mg/ml), 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and 1% glutamine. After an overnight incubation, the LPDS-containing cell medium was removed, spun at 3000 rpm in a table top centrifuge for 5 min to remove cell debris, and supplemented with 21 µg/ml aprotinin, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.1% EDTA, 0.02% azide, and 1 mM BHT. The media was immediately analyzed by gradient centrifugation or nondenaturing gradient gels.

Gradient Centrifugal Separation of Lipoproteins from the Medium

2 ml of the medium, harvested as described in the preceding paragraph, was layered at the interface of a 3-20 or 10-20% NaBr gradient and centrifuged in a Beckman SW41 Ti rotor at 38,000 rpm for 66 h at 15 °C(21) . The densities of individual fractions were determined by refractometry of a treatment medium blank included in the same run. 26 fractions were collected using an ISCO gradient collector with UV monitor (Instrument Specialties Co., Lincoln, NE), dialyzed against Tris-buffered saline (10 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 0.01% EDTA, 20 mM NaN(3), pH 7.4), and used for the apoprotein analysis via Western blotting using species-specific antibodies and I-protein A. I-Labeled chimeric protein bands were cut out from the blots, counted, and graphed. The area under the curve defined by two density ranges (d 1.063-1.125 g/ml and d 1.125-1.210 g/ml) was quantitated by a computer digitizer (Sigma Scan, Scientific Measurement System; Jandel Scientific) and expressed as a percentage of total area described by the gradient profile for each stable cell line.

Nondenaturing Gradient Gels

The LPDS-treated cell medium was loaded (60-100 µl/lane) directly onto 4-30% nondenaturing gradient gels. The standards (high molecular weight electrophoresis calibration kit, Pharmacia Biotech Inc.) had the following radii: thyroglobulin, 8.5 nm; ferritin, 6.1 nm; catalase, 4.6 nm; lactate dehydrogenase, 4.1 nm; albumin, 3.55 nm. Gels were electrophoretically separated in 90 mM Tris, 80 mM boric acid, 2.5 mM sodium azide, EDTA, pH 8.4, for 24 h at 360 mA/gel. The next day, the proteins were electrotransferred to Immobilon P membrane overnight and then probed with species-specific antibodies followed by ECL detection.

P Labeling of Phospholipids of Lipoproteins Secreted by McA-RH7777 Cells

Cells were seeded at a density of 0.75 times 10^6 cells per T25 flask. After 24 h, the cells were rinsed 3 times with sterile phosphate-buffered saline and then incubated overnight with 5 ml/flask of a pulse medium containing phosphate-free DMEM/high glucose, 10% horse serum, 10% fetal calf serum, 1% each penicillin, streptomycin, glutamine, 37.5 mg/liter Na(2)HPO(4)bullet7H(2)O, and 20 µCi/ml [P]orthophosphate (Amersham Corp., carrier-free, 370 MBq/ml). After 24 h, the pulse medium was removed, and cells were washed 3 times with sterile phosphate-buffered saline and chased for an additional 24 h with 3 ml of chase medium (DMEM/high glucose, 10% LPDS, 1% each penicillin, streptomycin, glutamine). The chase medium was subjected to equilibrium density gradient centrifugation as described above. The peak fractions for chimeric apoproteins and wild-type apoproteins, as determined by quantitative Western blotting with I-protein A, were dialyzed and run on 4-30% nondenaturing gradient gels. The gel was exposed to film at 4 °C for 7 days.

Determination of Apoprotein Association with VLDL via Metabolic Labeling and Column Fractionation

McA-RH7777 stable cell lines were plated at a cell density of 1.5 times 10^6 cells/T25 flask. After 24 h, the cells were pulsed with 100 µCi/ml TranS-label in methionine-free DMEM supplemented with 10% LPDS, 1% each penicillin, streptomycin, and glutamine, and 40 µM cold methionine for 24 h. 5 ml of labeled medium from cell lines expressing each chimeric apoprotein was fractionated on 1.5 times 120 cm Biogel A-5m columns equilibrated with 10 mM Tris, 0.3 M NaCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, 0.02% azide. The VLDL fractions were counted and graphed, and the peak fractions were immunoprecipitated with the appropriate specific antibodies to ascertain the presence of human apoproteins and endogenous rat apoE and apoA-I. Equal trichloroacetic acid precipitable counts of the unfractionated medium were similarly immunoprecipitated, and all samples were run on 9-15% gradient SDS-PAGE and subject to fluorography(22) . Unlabeled human plasma had been previously applied to these columns to demonstrate that VLDL was separable from LDL and HDL using this method.

Antibody Production

Antibodies were prepared in rabbits as described previously(12) . To prepare antibodies that distinguish between rat and human apoE and apoA-I, polyclonal antibodies to human apoE and apoA-I were passed through a column containing rat HDL. The antibodies to the human apoproteins that cross-react with rat apoproteins remained on the column, and human-specific antibodies were eluted. Antibodies to the rat apoproteins were purified in a similar fashion. The specificity of the antibodies was confirmed via Western blotting against human and rat VLDL and HDL.


RESULTS

In an effort to understand the difference in lipoprotein association patterns of apoE and apoA-I, we have constructed and expressed chimeric apoproteins using cDNAs in which the corresponding third and fourth exon regions of human apoE and human apoA-I are exchanged. These two exons code for the amino acids found in the mature protein. We refer to the amino acids encoded by the third exon as the N terminus (designated as n) and the amino acids encoded by the fourth exon as the C terminus (designated as c). Chimera apoEnA-Ic is encoded by a construct that specifies the apoE signal peptide and residues 1-61 followed by apoA-I residues 44-243. The complementary chimera, apoA-InEc, contains the apoA-I signal peptide, propeptide, and residues 1-43 followed by apoE residues 62-299. This chimera was constructed with the E3 allele, i.e. containing a cysteine at position 112. It is not known whether McA-RH7777 secrete apoA-I as a proprotein or a mature apoprotein; however, experiments with HepG2 cells show that apoA-I is secreted into the culture medium as a proprotein(22) . We included the propeptide in the apoA-InEc chimera for the sake of experimental consistency, assuming that whether or not the propeptide is removed in our cell system, the wild-type human apoA-I and apoA-InEc transfectants would be processed in the same manner. McA-RH7777 cells are derived from a rat hepatoma cell line and secrete VLDL- and HDL-like particles(6) . We prepared individual stable transfectants of this cell line expressing human wild-type apoE and apoA-I and the chimeric apoproteins.

Expression and Secretion of Chimeric Apoproteins and Wild-type Human Apoproteins

S-Labeled media from neo, apoEnA-Ic, and apoA-InEc stable transfected cells were immunoprecipitated with antibodies that differentiate between the endogenous rat apoE and apoA-I and the human apoproteins. The chimeric apoproteins can be distinguished from the endogenous rat apoE and apoA-I by their electrophoretic mobility on SDS-polyacrylamide gels (Fig. 2). ApoEnA-Ic has a calculated molecular mass of 30,700 Da, while chimera apoA-InEc is slightly larger with a calculated molecular mass of 31,700 Da. Both chimeras are recognized by antibodies specific for human anti-apoE (shown in Fig. 2) and anti-apoA-I (data not shown). To determine the relative levels of secretion of the chimeric apoproteins, wild-type human apoproteins, and the endogenous rat apoE and apoA-I, the transfected cells were labeled with TranS-label, the media were immunoprecipitated with the species-specific antibodies, and the regions of the gels corresponding to each apoprotein band were cut out and counted. The counts were corrected for the number of methionine residues in each protein, and the levels were expressed relative to rat apoE, which was set at 1.00 (Table 1, part A). Rat apoE levels were unaffected by the expression of the human apoproteins. With the possible exception of the cells transfected with human apoA-I cDNA, the rat apoE/rat apoA-I ratios appear to be unaffected by the presence of the human apoproteins and chimeras expressed by the transfected cells. The level of apoEnA-Ic secreted from the stably transfected cells is approximately 40% higher than the amount of rat apoE secreted from the same cell. ApoA-InEc is secreted at slightly lower levels, at approximately 60% the level of rat apoE. Table 1also includes the relative secretion levels of the human apoE and human apoA-I transfected clones. Both of these wild-type human apoproteins were expressed at higher levels than the chimeric apoproteins. In part B of Table 1, human apoA-I and apoEnA-Ic levels were also calculated relative to rat apoA-I for comparison. Human apoA-I is overexpressed relative to the other transfectants and appears to be associated with a decrease in endogenous rat apoA-I levels, but the effect of this overexpression on endogenous rat apoproteins was not fully explored.


Figure 2: Expression of chimeric apoproteins by McA-RH7777 cells. McA-RH7777 cells transfected with pSV2-neo, pCMV4-EnA-Ic or pCMV4-A-InEc were seeded at a density of 1.5 times 10^6 cells/T25 flasks and pulsed with 3 ml of 50 µCi/ml TranS-label in DMEM/high glucose, 10% LPDS with 40 µM methionine for 24 h. Equal trichloroacetic acid precipitable counts from each medium were immunoprecipitated simultaneously with species-specific antibodies to rat apoE, rat apoA-I, and human apoE. The immunoprecipitates were analyzed on SDS-polyacrylamide gels, followed by fluorography as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Lane 1, neo-transfected cells; lane 2, apoEnA-Ic-transfected cells; lane 3, apoA-InEc transfected cells.





NaBr Gradient Distribution of Chimeric Apoproteins

To examine the assembly of the chimeric apoproteins into lipoprotein particles secreted by the McA-RH7777 cells, lipoproteins secreted from each stable cell line into LPDS-containing medium were separated on equilibrium NaBr gradients, and the distributions of the endogenous rat apoE and apoA-I and transfected human apoproteins in the gradient fractions were determined by Western blotting. The distributions of endogenous rat apoE and apoA-I on the lipoprotein particles secreted by the pSV2-neo transfected McA-RH7777 cells are shown in Fig. 3, A and B, respectively. Both apoproteins were detected on particles in the HDL density range and in the lipid-poor fractions. The peak density of the rat apoE-containing nascent particles is 1.099 g/ml, and that of rat apoA-I is 1.089 g/ml. The profiles shown in Fig. 3, A and B, are single examples of the distribution pattern seen repeatedly in these experiments. This relative monodispersity of apoprotein distribution is consistent with the presence of one major subclass of HDL in rat plasma in contrast with the multiple HDL subclasses present in human plasma. Rat apoE was not consistently detected in the VLDL fractions obtained from the gradient centrifugation of McA-RH7777 cell medium. Thus these equilibrium gradients were used primarily to examine apoprotein association with HDL particles.


Figure 3: Distribution of apoproteins on nascent lipoproteins separated by equilibrium NaBr density gradients. McA-RH7777 cells transfected with pSV2-neo or the human apoprotein constructs were seeded at 1.5 times 10^6 cells/T25 flask. After 24 h, the medium was replaced with 3 ml of DMEM/high glucose plus 10% LPDS for an additional 24 h. Two ml of medium was fractionated on a NaBr density gradient as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' 120 µl of each fraction was subject to Western blotting using anti-rat or human specific antibodies to apoE and apoA-I and I-protein A. After exposure to x-ray film, the apoprotein bands were excised and counted, and cpms from each fraction were graphed. The density of each fraction was determined by refractometry. Panel A, single representative distribution profile of rat apoE; panel B, single representative distribution profile of rat apoA-I; panel C, composite distribution profile of human apoE, n = 5; panel D, composite distribution profile of human apoA-I, n = 4; panel E, composite distribution profile of apoA-InEc, n = 2; panel F, composite distribution profile of apoEnA-Ic, n = 4.



The association of the human apoE and apoA-I with nascent HDL particles separated by gradient centrifugation is shown in Fig. 3, C and D, respectively. The majority of both of these apoproteins is found associated with the nascent HDL particles. Like rat apoE, human apoE is found on lipoprotein particles that distribute as a single peak within the HDL density range of the gradient. The peak density is 1.108 g/ml, similar to the peak density of the endogenous rat apoproteins. However, the human apoE distribution is broader than that of either rat apoprotein E and A-I, and the broadening of this peak is toward the lighter and presumably larger lipoprotein fractions. In contrast to rat apoA-I and rat and human apoE, human apoA-I has a broader distribution and associates with lipoproteins of two distinct peak densities. The first peak has a density of 1.111 g/ml, and the second peak has a density of 1.164 g/ml. The broadness of the peaks is probably due to the high expression of human apoA-I. This polydisperse distribution pattern is characteristic of human apoA-I in the human HDL subclasses.

The association of the chimeric apoproteins with nascent hepatic lipoproteins secreted from the McA-RH7777 cells is shown in Fig. 3, E and F. ApoA-InEc is found on particles that distribute as a single peak with a peak density of 1.111 g/ml. Very little of this chimeric apoprotein was found in the lipid-poor ``bottom fractions.'' This distribution pattern is very similar to that of wild-type human apoE (Fig. 3C). Similar to the results with human apoA-I, apoEnA-Ic (Fig. 3F) was found associated with two discrete particles within the HDL density range of these gradients. The peak density of the lighter particles is 1.098 g/ml, similar to the peak density of particles containing apoA-InEc. The peak density of the denser particles is 1.137 g/ml. These densities correspond approximately to the densities of human HDL(2) and HDL(3), respectively. As with the apoA-InEc chimera, very little of this chimeric apoprotein was found in the lipid-poor bottom fractions.

To quantitate the information from these graphs, the area under the curve, defined by the conventional HDL(2) and HDL(3) density ranges, was measured using the Sigma SCAN computer program. Areas between d 1.063-1.125 g/ml and d 1.125-1.210 g/ml were expressed as a percentage of total area described by the specific HDL apoprotein distribution obtained from the medium of each stable cell line. As shown in Table 2, the percentage of the total apoEnA-Ic and human apoA-I found in the HDL(2) and HDL(3) density ranges is similar, with these apoproteins being distributed approximately equally in these fractions. By contrast, the major proportion of apoA-InEc and human apoE is found on particles in the HDL(2) density range.



Nondenaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis of Nascent Lipoproteins

To determine the size of the particles secreted from the stable transfected cells, the cells were labeled with [P]orthophosphate for 24 h, and the phospholipid-labeled lipoproteins secreted from cells during a 24 h chase were separated on NaBr equilibrium gradients. The peak fractions for each of the apoproteins were analyzed on nondenaturing gradient gels (Fig. 4). The rat HDL particles secreted from neo-transfected cells have a radius of 4.50 nm. Two discrete sized particles were observed for human apoA-I and apoEnA-Ic. The lighter fractions on the gradients (lanes 1 and 3) contain particles with radii of 4.65 nm, similar to the particle in the neo-transfected cells, while the particle sizes in the more dense fractions (lanes 2 and 4) are 3.75 and 3.90 nm, respectively, for apoA-I and apoEnA-Ic. When compared with the radii of the labeled particles in the peak fraction obtained from control neo-transfected cells (lane 7, at d 1.0987 g/ml, radius = 4.50 nm), human apoE appears to transform this particle species to a larger size (lane 5, at d 1.0987 g/ml, radii range = 5.45-8.85 nm). ApoA-InEc also induces a similar transformation (lane 6, at d 1.0987 g/ml, radii range = 4.85-8.20 nm), although not as effectively.


Figure 4: Nondenaturing gradient gels of [P]orthophosphate-labeled lipoproteins. Cells were seeded at a density of 0.75 times 10^6/T25 flask. The following day, the cells were incubated with a 5-ml pulse medium containing DMEM/high glucose, 10% horse serum, 10% fetal calf serum, 1% each penicillin, streptomycin, glutamine, 37.5 mg/liter Na(2)HPO(4)bullet7H(2)O, and 20 µCi/ml [P]orthophosphate. After 24 h, the cells were chased with DMEM/high glucose plus 10% LPDS for an additional 24 h. 2 ml of each medium sample was run on 10-20% NaBr gradients as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Peak fractions, as determined by Western blotting for each cell line, were loaded onto a 4-30% nondenaturing gradient gel. Lanes 1 and 2 are aliquots of 1.098 and 1.146 g/ml density fractions from human apoA-I transfected cells, respectively; lanes 3 and 4 are aliquots of 1.098 and 1.136 g/ml density fractions from apoEnA-Ic transfected cells, respectively; lane 5, the 1.098 g/ml density fraction from human apoE transfected cells; lane 6, the 1.098 g/ml fraction from apoA-InEc transfected cells; lane 7, the 1.098 g/ml density fraction from neo-transfected cells.



To confirm that the P-labeled lipoproteins contain the human wild-type and chimeric apoproteins, unfractionated media from the stable transfected cells were analyzed on nondenaturing gradient gels, which were subsequently immunoblotted with species-specific antibodies (Fig. 5). Human apoA-I and apoEnA-Ic are both found on two distinct sized particles. ApoA-I is found on particles within the broad range of 5.90-4.50 nm in radii and in particles with radii of 3.90 nm. ApoEnA-Ic is found on particles with radii of 5.80-4.75 nm and 4.00 nm. Human apoE was detected on particles with radii ranging from 8.60 to 5.70 nm and a minor band at 4.3 nm. ApoA-InEc has a similar pattern with this apoprotein detected on particles with radii ranging from 8.50 to 5.15 nm and a minor band at 4.1 nm.


Figure 5: Western blotting of unfractionated media run on 4-30% nondenaturing gradient gels. McA-RH7777 cell lines expressing human apoproteins, and chimeras were seeded at a density of 1.5 times 10^6 cells/T25 flask. After 24 h, the medium was replaced with DMEM/high glucose with 10% LPDS for an additional 24 h. 60 µl of medium from each cell line was then loaded onto 4-30% nondenaturing gradient gels, transferred to Immobilon P membrane, and probed with human specific antibodies, followed by ECL detection. Comparison of the chimeric apoprotein lipoprotein distributions with that of the wild-type human apoproteins is shown. Lane 1, human apoA-I medium; lane 2, apoEnA-Ic medium; lane 3, human apoE medium; lane 4, apoA-InEc medium. Note, lanes 1 and 2 were probed with anti-human specific apoA-I antibodies, and lanes 3 and 4 were probed with anti-human specific apoE antibodies. The following standards were used to generate a standard curve to calculate the following radii: thyroglobulin, 8.5 nm; ferritin, 6.1 nm; catalase, 4.6 nm; lactate dehydrogenase, 4.1 nm; albumin, 3.55 nm.



Association with Nascent VLDL Particles

Sodium bromide gradients were not useful for analyzing apoprotein association with VLDL, since we could not consistently demonstrate endogenous rat apoE in the top part of the gradient. The prolonged centrifugation was probably responsible for loss of apoE from the nascent VLDL. To characterize VLDL-sized particle association, we isolated the VLDL particles by gel filtration chromatography using Biogel A-5m columns. Upon separation of human plasma on these columns, we detected apoB and apoE in fractions 60-70, apoB in fractions 70-90, and primarily albumin and other proteins in fractions >100 (data not shown). We infer from this pattern that plasma VLDL is readily separated from plasma LDL on these columns.

Hepatoma cell medium containing chimeric proteins labeled with TranS-label was fractionated on these columns, and the VLDL peak was identified by counting aliquots of fractions between 52 and 70. Equal amounts of radioactivity from total media and the three VLDL peak fractions isolated from the media of the two chimeric apoprotein expressing cells were immunoprecipitated to ascertain the presence of the chimeric apoproteins, rat apoE and rat apoA-I. As seen in Fig. 6A, apoA-InEc was associated with the nascent VLDL particles (lanes 6-8), while apoEnA-Ic (lanes 2-4) was barely detectable. The low level of association of apoEnA-Ic was not due to the absence of the protein in the media, since approximately comparable levels of the two chimeric apoproteins were immunoprecipitated from the unfractionated media (lanes 1 and 5). Wild-type human apoE is also associated with VLDL particles (Fig. 6B). Rat apoE is present in the VLDL fractions but at significantly lower levels in the presence of apoA-InEc than apoEnA-Ic. This may be due to displacement of the rat apoE from the VLDL particles by the apoE portion of the apoA-InEc chimera. Negligible levels of rat apoA-I (Fig. 6A) and human apoA-I (data not shown) are detected in the VLDL fractions as expected.


Figure 6: Association of wild-type and chimeric apoprotein with VLDL particles. Cells were seeded and labeled with TranS-label as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' 5 ml of medium was fractionated on Biogel A-5m columns, and the VLDL peak was identified by counting an aliquot of each fraction. Equal levels of radioactive media or fractions were immunoprecipitated with anti-rat apoE antibodies, anti-rat apoA-I antibodies, and anti-human apoA-I, simultaneously. A, lane 1, unfractionated medium from apoEnA-Ic-expressing cells; lanes 2-4, peak three VLDL fractions from apoEnA-Ic-expressing cells; lane 5, unfractionated medium from apoA-InEc-expressing cells; lanes 6-8, peak VLDL fractions from apoA-InEc-expressing cells. B, samples from human apoE expressing McA-RH7777 cells: total medium and combined peak fractions 55/56, 57/58, 59/60, immunoprecipitated separately for human apoE and rat apoE.




DISCUSSION

In this study, we have set out to determine whether the domains of human apoproteins E and A-I encoded by the third or fourth exons account for their selective targeting to VLDL and subsets of HDL. Our results indicate that the selective targeting of apoproteins E and A-I to nascent lipoproteins secreted from hepatoma cells is attributable largely to the domains of these apoproteins encoded by the fourth exons, which specify a series of amphipathic alpha helices. Preliminary studies utilizing the same chimeric proteins as used in this study produced in Escherichia coli indicate that similar domains function to target the apoproteins to mature human plasma lipoproteins. However, we cannot discount a small contribution from domains encoded by the third exons, although any effects these domains have must be quite subtle. Our results also suggest quite strongly that the domains encoded by the fourth exon of the apoA-I gene account for the observed differences in the HDL subclass present in humans and rodents.

The majority of the human apoE associated with HDL-like particles with a density similar to those particles secreted by the neo transfected cells, as observed on equilibrium density gradients, although there does appear to be a broader distribution of particles on the HDL population containing human apoE than those containing rat apoE. This broadening affects both a subpopulation of higher density particles that also contain human apoE as well as a set of lighter subfractions (fractions of density 1.07 and 1.08 g/ml, Fig. 3C). Thus, human apoE is capable of associating with particles of similar density as the rat apoproteins. However, when the sizes of the particles were examined on nondenaturing gels, the majority of the human apoE containing particles were larger (radii = 8.85-5.45 nm) than the HDL particles secreted from the neo-transfected cells (radius = 4.50 nm). The density of the particles with which apoA-InEc associates is again similar to that of human apoE with a monodisperse distribution, although not quite as diffuse as the latter. Thus it appears that the fourth exon encoded amino acids of human apoE allow the formation of these larger HDL particles without significantly altering the density of the particles.

In contrast to the distribution of rat apoA-I, human apoA-I distributes onto particles with two distinct densities and sizes. The particles in the first peak of the NaBr density gradients have the same density and size as those in the single peak of the control cells, while the particles in the second peak are more dense and smaller in size. ApoEnA-Ic, which contains the fourth exon of apoA-I, also associates with two different particles of distinct size and density. These results suggest that the fourth exon-encoded amino acids of apoA-I are sufficient to determine HDL association and the formation of HDL subclasses. In addition, they strongly suggest that amino acid differences in the fourth exon-encoded amino acids of rat and human apoA-I may account for the different HDL subclass formation in humans and rodents.

The different lipoprotein distribution patterns seen for rat apoA-I compared with human apoA-I, and as shown here apoEnA-Ic, have been observed previously in mice expressing human apoA-I as a transgene (23) . In control mice, the HDL profile was monodisperse, and the mouse apoA-I associated with particles 4.6 nm in radius. By contrast, the transgenic mice exhibited a biphasic HDL profile and the human apoA-I appeared in particles with radii of 5.1 and 4.15 nm. An explanation for these differences may reside in the primary sequence of the fourth exon-encoded amino acids. Since rat and mouse both appear to have monodisperse HDL distributions, while human HDL distributions are polydisperse (biphasic), the important contribution to the difference between rat and human must be shared between rat and mouse. There are 56 positions in the fourth exon in which both rat and mouse sequences differ from the human (Fig. 7). At 12 of these positions, there is either a proline or a charge change, and at five a change in hydrophobicity. The charge changes are clustered in helices 6 and 7, both of which are class A helices(24, 25) . The single proline change is at position +187 (using human sequence numbering) and may be the best candidate.


Figure 7: Fourth exon encoded amino acid sequence comparison of human, rat, and mouse apoA-I. The fourth exon-encoded sequences are separated into groupings of 11- and 22-amino acid helical repeats, which are separated by prolines. Rat and mouse amino acid residues that are different from human apoA-I are shown in lower case. Those not shown are identical to human residues. Boldface and underlined residues with &cjs1229; above represent charge changes or proline changes between human apoA-I and both rat and mouse apoA-I. Hydrophobic changes are marked with * above. Dash indicates a deletion.



Studies by Leroy et al.(26) have suggested that differences in the helical repeat regions of apoA-I, apoE, and apoA-IV may account for the spontaneous formation of discrete sized reconstituted HDL (rHDL) particles in the presence of varying amounts of palmitoyloleoylphosphatidylcholine. Generally, it was observed that the apoprotein with the greatest number of repeats, apoA-IV, was capable of forming the largest rHDL, while apoE formed larger rHDL than did apoA-I. This phenomenon may explain the formation of larger particles by the McA-RH7777 cells in the presence of human apoE. Human apoE is found on the cholesterol ester-enriched classes of HDL, HDL(1)/HDL(c)(18, 27, 28) , and its ability to conform to these larger particles, relative to apoA-I, may play an important role in reverse cholesterol transport.

In our cell culture model, human apoE and apoA-InEc were also found associated with the VLDL-like particles secreted by the McA-RH7777 cells. By contrast, neither human apoA-I nor apoEnA-Ic associated with VLDL particles. Thus the third exon of each of these parent apoprotein genes does not encode a strong VLDL targeting domain. In addition, the rat apoE levels in the peak fractions from apoA-InEc transfected cells appeared to be lower than in the apoEnA-Ic transfected cell line. This difference suggests that apoA-InEc and rat apoE may be competing for association with the VLDL-sized particles. However, the wild-type human apoE does not appear to displace rat apoE^2 despite being expressed at higher levels than apoA-InEc. There may be a subtle effect of the apoA-I third exon region in the apoA-InEc chimera, which needs to be further explored before a full explanation can be reached.

In conclusion, we have established a model for efficient expression of chimeric apoproteins and have shown that the chimeric nature of these apoproteins is not detrimental to their expression or secretion. Our results support the conclusion that the fourth exon-encoded amino acids of apoE contain sequences that target apoE to VLDL and larger HDL classes. The fourth exons of both apoE and apoA-I also encode amino acid sequences that determine not only the association of each apoprotein with HDL but also the ability to form different subclasses of HDL particles. Thus it appears that it is the nature of the apoprotein secreted that is primarily responsible for the size and density of particles produced by hepatoma cells. It remains to be established whether sequences encoded by exon 4 alone are sufficient to determine lipoprotein association. The role of exon 3-encoded sequences, even though highly conserved across species in the case of apoE, is uncertain, since this region is not the primary or major determinant of lipoprotein association and also does not impede lipoprotein association directed by exon 4 sequences.


FOOTNOTES

*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant HL 15062 (Specialized Center of Research in Atherosclerosis). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
Supported by National Research Service Award Grant F30 AA05311. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pathology, MC 6079, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., Chicago, IL 60637-1470. Tel.: 312-702-1265; Fax: 312-702-3778.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: apo, apolipoprotein; VLDL, very low density lipoprotein; HDL, high density lipoprotein; n, third exon encoded amino acids; c, fourth exon encoded amino acids; McA-RH7777, McArdle rat hepatoma cells; CMV, cytomegalovirus; LPDS, lipoprotein- deficient serum; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium.

(^2)
C. Reardon, L. Blachowicz, and G. Getz, manuscript in preparation.


REFERENCES

  1. Li, W.-H., Tanimura, M., Luo, C.-C., Datta, S., and Chan, L. (1988) J. Lipid Res. 29, 245-271 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Sparrow, J. T., Gotto, A. M., Jr., and Morrisett, J. D. (1973) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 70, 2124-2128 [Abstract]
  3. Segrest, J. P., Chung, B. H., Brouillette, C. G., Kanellis, P., and McGahan, R. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 2290-2295 [Free Full Text]
  4. Mahley, R. W., Innerarity, T. L., Rall, S. C., and Weisgraber, K. H. (1984) J. Lipid Res. 25, 1277-1294 [Abstract]
  5. Gordon, V., Innerarity, T. L., and Mahley, R. W. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 6202-6212 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Tanabe, S., Sherman, H., Smith, L., Yang, L.-A., Fleming, R., and Hay, R. (1989) In Vitro Cell. & Dev. Biol. 25, 1129-1140
  7. Yao, Z., Lauer, S. J., Sana, D. A., and Fazio, S. (1993) Arterioscler. Thromb. 13, 1476-1486 [Abstract]
  8. Gilbert, W. (1978) Nature 271, 501 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Sudhof, T. C., Goldstein, J. L., Brown, M. S., and Russell, D. W. (1985) Science 228, 815-822 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Brack, C., and Tonegawa, S. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 74, 5652-5656 [Abstract]
  11. Lonberg, N., and Gilbert, W. (1985) Cell 40, 81-90 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Hay, R., and Getz, G. S. (1979) J. Lipid Res. 20, 334-348 [Abstract]
  13. Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A., and Struhl, K. (eds) (1993) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology , Green Publishing Associates, Inc. and John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Boston, MA
  14. Vandeyar, M. A., Weiner, M. P., Hutton, C. J., and Batt, C. A. (1988) Gene (Amst.) 65, 129-133
  15. Andersson, S., Davis, D. L., Dahlback, H., Jornvall, H., and Russell, D. W. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 8222-8229 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Zannis, V. I., Breslow, J. L., SanGiacomo, T. R., Aden, D. P., and Knowles, B. B. (1981) Biochemistry 20, 7089-7096 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Kozak, M. (1987) J. Mol. Biol. 196, 947-950 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Koo, C., Innerarity, T. L., and Mahley, R. W. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 11934-11943 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Graham, F. L., and van der Eb, A. J. (1973) Virology 52, 456-467 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J. (1951) J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265-275 [Free Full Text]
  21. Cabana, V. G., Seigel, J. N., and Sabesin, S. M. (1989) J. Lipid Res. 30, 39-49 [Abstract]
  22. Edelstein, C., Gordon, J. I., Toscas, K., Sims, H. F., Strauss, A. W., and Scanu, A. M. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 11430-11433 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Rubin, E. M., Ishida, B. Y., Clift, S. M., and Krauss, R. M. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 434-438 [Abstract]
  24. Segrest, J. P., Jones, M. K., De Loof, H., Brouillette, C. G., Venkatachalapathi, Y. V., and Anantharamaiah, G. M. (1992) J. Lipid Res. 33, 141-166 [Abstract]
  25. Epand, R. M., Shai, Y., Segrest, J. P., and Anantharamaiah, G. M. (1995) Biopolymers 37, 319-338 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Leroy, A., Toohill, K. L. H., Fruchart, J.-C., and Jonas, A. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 4798-4805 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Mahley, R. W. (1983) Klin. Wochenschr. 61, 225-232 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Mahley, R. W. (1988) Science 240, 622-630 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.