©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Molecular Ordering of the Cell Death Pathway
Bcl-2 AND Bcl-x(L) FUNCTION UPSTREAM OF THE CED-3-LIKE APOPTOTIC PROTEASES (*)

(Received for publication, January 4, 1996)

Arul M. Chinnaiyan (§) Kim Orth Karen O'Rourke Hangjun Duan Guy G. Poirier (1) Vishva M. Dixit (¶)

From the Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 Poly(ADP-Ribose) Metabolism Group, Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, Centre Hospitalier de I'Université Laval Research Center and Laval University Sainte-Foy, Quebec G1V 4G2, Canada

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

Genetic analyses of Caenorhabditis elegans has identified three genes that function in the regulation of nematode cell death. Mammalian homologs of two of these genes, ced-9 and ced-3, have been identified and comprise proteins belonging to the Bcl-2 and ICE families, respectively. To date, it is unclear where the negative regulators, ced-9 and bcl-2, function relative to the death effectors, ced-3 and the mammalian ced-3 homologs, respectively. Here, the molecular order of the cell death pathway is defined. Our results establish that Bcl-2 and Bcl-x(L) function upstream of two members of the ICE/CED-3 family of cysteine proteases, Yama (CPP32/apopain) and ICE-LAP3 (Mch3).


INTRODUCTION

Apoptosis, or programmed cell death, is a physiologic process important in the normal development and homeostasis of multicellular organisms(1, 2) . It is encoded by an endogenous program, conserved throughout metazoan evolution, ultimately resulting in cellular suicide. Derangements of apoptosis can have deleterious consequences as exemplified by several human disease states, including acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, neurodegenerative disorders, and cancer (3) .

Despite its paramount importance, the molecular mechanism of apoptosis is poorly understood. The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans has been a powerful tool in the identification of critical components of the cell death machinery(4) . Systematic genetic analyses have elucidated three genes, ced-3, ced-4, and ced-9, that are important in the regulation of nematode cell death. Mutations of ced-3 and ced-4 abolish all somatic cell deaths that normally occur during the development of C. elegans, suggesting that these genes encode effector components of the pathway(4) . By contrast, ced-9 encodes a negative regulator that functions to suppress inappropriate cellular suicide(5) . Mammalian homologs of ced-9 and ced-3 have been identified and include proteins belonging to the Bcl-2 and ICE (^1)family, respectively(6, 7) . However, no homologs of ced-4 have thus far been identified.

Bcl-2 is the prototypic member of a growing family of cell death regulators(8, 9) . First identified for its role in B-cell malignancies, expression of Bcl-2 has been shown to inhibit cell death due to a variety of apoptotic stimuli and in numerous cell types(10) . Bcl-2 can substitute functionally for ced-9, preventing nematode cell death and further emphasizing the highly conserved nature of the cell death pathway(6) .

An important advance came with the discovery that the nematode death effector ced-3 had significant homology with the mammalian protease interleukin-1beta converting enzyme (ICE)(7) . ICE is involved in the proteolytic processing of pro-IL-1beta to the active cytokine (11, 12) . Overexpression of ICE or CED-3 in mammalian cells induces apoptosis, suggesting that ICE, or a related protease, is an essential component of the mammalian cell death pathway(13) .

Evidence is growing, however, that ICE itself may not be the mammalian ced-3 equivalent as: 1) a number of cell types stably secrete mature IL-1beta without undergoing apoptosis; 2) ICE-deficient mice, although unable to generate active IL-1beta, fail to exhibit a prominent cell death defective phenotype(14, 15) . Recently, several ICE/CED-3 homologs have been identified which comprise an emerging family of aspartate-specific cysteine proteases that include Nedd-2/ICH1(16, 17) , Yama/CPP32/apopain(18, 19, 20) , TX/ICH2/ICE rel-II (21, 22, 23) , ICE-rel III(21) , Mch2(24) , and ICE-LAP3/Mch3(25, 26) . Distinct from the prototype ICE, Yama and ICE-LAP3 cleave the death substrate poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) into signature apoptotic fragments(18, 19, 26) . Importantly, CED-3 has a similar substrate specificity as it also cleaves PARP at the same site (27) .

Although important regulators of the cell death pathway have been identified, little is known about their molecular order of function. To date, it is unclear whether ced-9 and bcl-2 function upstream or downstream of ced-3 and the mammalian ced-3 equivalent, respectively. Biochemically defining the sequence of the pathway is of utmost importance if one is to gain insight into how the pathway functions and how it is regulated. Here we report that Yama and ICE-LAP3, the two mammalian proteases most related to CED-3, are both activated by apoptotic stimuli. Importantly, we demonstrate order in the pathway by providing biochemical evidence that Bcl-2 and Bcl-x(L) function upstream of Yama and ICE-LAP3.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell Lines and Culture

Jurkat cells were cultured in complete RPMI 1640 media (10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Hyclone), L-glutamine, penicillin/streptomycin, and nonessential amino acids). To generate Bcl-2- and Bcl-x(L)-expressing cell lines, cells were electroporated at 310 V, 960 microfarads in 0.4-cm cuvettes (Bio-Rad) using control vector, pEBS-bcl-2, and pEBS-bcl-x(L), and subsequently selected with 0.4 mg/ml hygromycin (Calbiochem). Pooled populations were assessed for expression by immunoblotting using anti-Bcl-x and anti-Bcl-2 antibodies (Santa Cruz). To generate CrmA expressing Jurkat cell lines, cells were similarly transfected using control vector and pZEM-CrmA and selected with 2 mg/ml G418 (Life Technologies, Inc.). Clonal lines were derived as described previously(28) , and five clones were pooled to form the cell lines analyzed. Expression of CrmA was verified by immunoblotting as described previously(18) .Since an inducible expression construct (pZEM) was used, vector and CrmA transfectants were incubated with 5 µM CdCl(2) for 4 h before various assays were performed.

Immunoblotting of Yama and ICE-LAP3

Jurkat cells (20 times 10^6) were left untreated or treated with 2 µM staurosporine (Sigma) or 200 ng/ml anti-APO-1 (IgG3(29) ) for the indicated time periods in a 5-ml volume of serum-free RPMI 1640. Cells were pelleted, freeze-thawed once, and lysed in 0.1% Nonidet P-40 (75 µl) for 10 min. The cells were then sonicated six times for 15 s and then freeze-thawed three times. Samples were centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 25 min at 4 °C. Cytosolic extracts were removed and added to sample buffer. Samples were analyzed on a 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. Immunoblotting was done using a 1:1000 dilution of primary antibodies, and a 1:10,000 dilution of secondary anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase (Amersham), and developed by ECL (Amersham). Rabbit anti-peptide antibodies (Lampire) were raised against the p17 subunit of Yama (NNKNFHKSTGMTSRSGTD), the p12 subunit of Yama (STAPGYYSWRNSKDGS), and the p20 subunit of ICE-LAP3 (KPDRSSFVPSLFSKKKKN).

DNA Fragmentation Assay and PARP Analysis

PARP analysis was done as described previously(18) . Anti-PARP antibody was clone C-2-10, which is described previously(30) , and recognizes an epitope near the N terminus of PARP located between amino acids 216 and 375. DNA isolation and fragmentation assays were done as described previously(31) .


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Yama and ICE-LAP3 Are Activated by Various Apoptotic Stimuli

Based on similarities with the structural prototype interleukin-1beta converting enzyme, ICE/CED-3 family members are synthesized as proenzymes which are proteolytically processed to form active heterodimeric enzymes (Fig. 1A(11) ). Evidence is growing that Yama (CPP32/apopain) may play a more important role in the apoptotic pathway than ICE itself (18, 19) . Yama is expressed as a 32-kDa precursor which upon activation is processed into p17 and p12 subunits(19) . Therefore, we determined whether Yama is activated as an early event during apoptosis induced by Fas/APO-1 and the protein kinase inhibitor staurosporine(32) . Jurkat T-cells expressed the 32-kDa proform of Yama, and treatment with staurosporine or anti-APO-1 antibody generated active p17 and p12 subunits (Fig. 1B). Intermediate forms of the larger p17 subunit were also observed and likely contain the small prodomain of Yama (Fig. 1A).


Figure 1: The mammalian CED-3 homologs, Yama and ICE-LAP3, are activated by apoptotic stimuli. A, schematic representation of the active and inactive forms of ICE, Yama, and ICE-LAP3. B, activation of Yama and ICE-LAP3 by Fas/APO-1 and staurosporine. Jurkat cells were either left untreated or treated with 2 µM staurosporine or 200 ng/ml anti-APO-1 antibody for 3 h. Cytosolic extracts from 10 times 10^6 Jurkat cells were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and subsequently immunoblotted with antibodies directed against the p17 and p12 subunits of Yama or an antibody against the p20 subunit of ICE-LAP3. Similar results were obtained using BJAB or CEM cells (data not shown). Intermediate forms of the p17 subunit of Yama were also observed (specific only to antibody directed against the p17 subunit) likely containing the prodomain. Upon activation, a 30-kDa species of ICE-LAP3 was often observed and corresponds to a form lacking the prodomain.



A related member of the ICE/CED-3 family was recently cloned and designated ICE-LAP3/Mch3 ((25, 26) Fig. 1A). Of the homologs thus far identified, ICE-LAP3 is the most closely related to Yama, sharing 58% sequence identity and 75% similarity(25) . More importantly, endogenous pro-ICE-LAP3 (p35) is also activated by Fas/APO-1 (25) and staurosporine (Fig. 1B), generating p20 and p12 subunits. A 30-kDa form of ICE-LAP3 (p30) was often observed upon activation and likely represents a prodomain-less species.

Taken together, these results show that Yama and ICE-LAP3, the two ICE-like proteases sharing the most sequence homology and substrate specificity with CED-3(18, 19, 25, 26, 27) , are activated by an apoptotic signal. In contrast to C. elegans, this suggests that the mammalian cell death pathway may require more than one ICE/CED-3 family member to execute the cell death program.

Bcl-2 and Bcl-x(L) Function Upstream of Yama and ICE-LAP3

The Bcl-2 family of proteins has been shown to prevent cell death induced by a variety of signals and in numerous cell types (9, 10) . However, little is known about where Bcl-2 functions relative to the apoptotic proteases. To address this important question, we generated Jurkat cells overexpressing Bcl-2 or Bcl-x(L) using episomal expression constructs. Expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-x(L) in the pooled population was confirmed by immunoblotting (Fig. 2A). Staurosporine has been shown to reliably induce Bcl-2-inhibitable cell death in a variety of cell lines(32, 33, 34) . As expected, Jurkat cells expressing Bcl-2 and Bcl-x(L) were resistant to staurosporine-induced apoptosis as assessed by DNA fragmentation (Fig. 2B) and nuclear morphology (data not shown). An apoptotic stimulus that is not consistently blocked by Bcl-2 is activation of Fas/APO-1(9, 10, 35, 36) . In our Jurkat cell system, expression of Bcl-2 or Bcl-x(L) did not inhibit anti-APO-1-induced cell death or PARP cleavage (Fig. 2, B and C).


Figure 2: Bcl-2 and Bcl-x(L) function upstream of Yama and ICE-LAP3. A, expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-x(L) in Jurkat cell lines. Jurkat cells were transfected with control vector, pEBs-bcl-x(L), or pEBs-bcl-2 and selected with hygromycin. SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting were done as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' B, Bcl-2 and Bcl-x(L) prevent staurosporine-induced cell death but not Fas/APO-1-induced cell death. Jurkat cells (2 times 10^7) were left untreated, treated with staurosporine (2 µM) for 18 h, or treated with anti-APO-1 antibody (200 ng/ml) for 6 h. Cells were then analyzed for DNA fragmentation as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' Additionally, nuclear morphology assessed by acridine orange staining yielded similar results (data not shown). C, staurosporine-induced cleavage of the death substrate, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, is blocked by Bcl-2 and Bcl-x(L). Jurkat cells were left untreated, treated with 2 µM staurosporine, or treated with 200 ng/ml anti-APO-1 antibody for 6 h and analyzed for PARP cleavage as described previously(18) . D, Bcl-2 and Bcl-x(L) block staurosporine-induced Yama and ICE-LAP3 activation. Jurkat cells were left untreated, treated with 2 µM staurosporine for 3 h, or treated with 200 ng/ml anti-APO-1 antibody for 1.5 h and analyzed as in Fig. 1B. See Fig. 1B for a description of the different subunits observed.



To provide biochemical proof of whether Bcl-2 and Bcl-x(L) function upstream or downstream of the apoptotic ICE/CED-3 cysteine proteases, we directly assessed Yama and ICE-LAP3 activation under various conditions. Overexpression of Bcl-2 or Bcl-x(L) abrogated staurosporine-induced generation of active Yama and ICE-LAP3 (Fig. 2D). Similar results were obtained using another Bcl-2/Bcl-x(L)-inhibitable death stimulus, thapsigargin (data not shown), which is a specific inhibitor of the endoplasmic reticulum Ca-ATPase(37) . The inhibitory action of Bcl-2 and Bcl-x(L) could be ``bypassed'' by treatment with anti-APO-1 antibody, resulting in activation of the apoptotic proteases (Fig. 2D). Our conclusions are not a peculiarity of Jurkat cells since similar results were obtained using a well characterized Bcl-2-expressing CEM cell line ( (35) and data not shown).

Evidence for a Proteolytic Cascade in the Fas/APO-1 Cell Death Pathway

Unlike staurosporine and thapsigargin treatment, Fas/APO-1-induced Yama/ICE-LAP3 activation and resulting apoptosis were not blocked by Bcl-2 or Bcl-x(L) in our Jurkat cell system. There could be numerous explanations for this phenomena, including differences between cell types, strength of death stimulus, and expression levels of negative regulators. Alternatively, distinct apoptosis signaling pathways may exist, some of which are more sensitive to Bcl-2 and Bcl-x(L). To address this possibility, we generated Jurkat cells expressing CrmA (Fig. 3A), a poxvirus serpin which a number of groups have shown to abrogate Fas/APO-1-induced apoptosis(28, 38, 39) . CrmA is an inhibitor of the ICE family of cysteine proteases and has been shown to inhibit ICE and Yama in vitro(18) . CrmA-expressing Jurkat cells were resistant to anti-APO-1-induced cell death, but not staurosporine-induced apoptosis (Fig. 3B). Integrity of PARP was also monitored, and, likewise, CrmA blocked PARP cleavage induced by Fas/APO-1 but not by staurosporine. Similar results were obtained using a previously characterized CrmA-expressing BJAB cell line(18, 28) .


Figure 3: The CrmA target is upstream of Yama and ICE-LAP3. A, expression of CrmA in Jurkat cell lines. Jurkat cells were transfected with control vector or pZEM-CrmA and selected with neomycin. Seven anti-APO-1-resistant clones were identified and pooled. SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting were done as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' The BJAB CrmA cell line was described previously(28) . B, CrmA prevents Fas/APO-1-induced cell death but not staurosporine-induced cell death. Jurkat cells (2 times 10^7) were left untreated, treated with staurosporine (2 µM) for 18 h, or treated with anti-APO-1 antibody (200 ng/ml) for 6 h. Cells were then analyzed for DNA fragmentation as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' Additionally, nuclear morphology assessed by acridine orange staining yielded similar results (data not shown). C, Fas/APO-1-, but not staurosporine-, induced cleavage of PARP is blocked by CrmA. Jurkat cells were left untreated, treated with 2 µM staurosporine, or treated with 200 ng/ml anti-APO-1 antibody for 6 h and analyzed for PARP cleavage as described previously(28) . D, CrmA blocks Fas/APO-1-induced Yama and ICE-LAP3 activation. Jurkat cells were left untreated, treated with 2 µM staurosporine for 3 h, or treated with 200 ng/ml anti-APO-1 antibody for 1.5 h and analyzed as in Fig. 1B. See Fig. 1B for a description of the different subunits observed.



To determine whether CrmA directly inhibited Yama and/or ICE-LAP3 in vivo, activation of these apoptotic proteases was directly assessed. Consistent with DNA fragmentation and PARP analysis (Fig. 3, B and C), staurosporine-induced Yama and ICE-LAP3 activation were not blocked by CrmA (Fig. 3D). Interestingly, Fas/APO-1-induced generation of active Yama and ICE-LAP3 was potently abrogated by CrmA, suggesting the existence of a CrmA-inhibitable ICE-like protease upstream of Yama and ICE-LAP3. The fact that staurosporine-induced apoptosis is prevented by Bcl-2/Bcl-x(L) and not by CrmA, coupled with the observation that Fas/APO-1-induced cell death is inhibited by CrmA but not by Bcl-2/Bcl-x(L), argues for the existence of distinct apoptosis signaling pathways.

Conclusions

Prior to this study, little was known about where the negative regulators, ced-9 and bcl-2, functioned relative to the death effectors, ced-3 and the mammalian ced-3 homologs (reviewed in (40) ). Our results demonstrate that staurosporine-induced cell death, PARP cleavage, and Yama/ICE-LAP3 activation are blocked by Bcl-2 and Bcl-x(L). This establishes that Bcl-2 and Bcl-x(L) function upstream of the two most related mammalian ced-3 homologs, Yama and ICE-LAP3 (Fig. 4). Further, it is reasonable to postulate that a similar relationship exists between ced-9 and ced-3.


Figure 4: Molecular ordering of the cell death pathway. Three signals for cell death are illustrated: 1) a Bcl-2-inhibitable pathway in which Bcl-2 and Bcl-x(L) function upstream of the CED-3-like apoptotic proteases, 2) granzyme B-mediated direct activation of the apoptotic proteases, 3) Fas/APO-1 activation of a proteolytic cascade.



In our Jurkat cell system, Fas/APO-1-induced cell death was not blocked by Bcl-2 or Bcl-x(L) (Fig. 2B). Thus, it was not surprising that Bcl-2 or Bcl-x(L) failed to inhibit Fas/APO-1-induced PARP cleavage and Yama/ICE-LAP3 activation (Fig. 2, C and D). CrmA, on the other hand, potently abrogated Fas/APO-1-induced cell death, PARP cleavage, and Yama/ICE-LAP3 activation (Fig. 3). Interestingly, CrmA failed to inhibit the death pathway triggered by staurosporine (Fig. 3). Taken together, our data suggest the existence of distinct apoptosis signaling pathways displaying differential sensitivity to Bcl-2/Bcl-x(L) and CrmA (Fig. 4).

In vitro, CrmA interacts only with the active forms of ICE or Yama(18) . However, both Yama and ICE-LAP3 remained as proenzymes in anti-APO-1-treated CrmA expressing cells, suggesting that CrmA inhibits an ICE-like protease upstream of Yama and ICE-LAP3. This hypothesis is especially attractive considering that granzyme B-induced cell death, which is not Bcl-2-inhibitable, likely occurs via direct activation of Yama (and/or Yama-related proteases)(41, 42) . Therefore, we postulate that Fas/APO-1 signals the activation of a proteolytic cascade, analogous to the coagulation or complement systems, and in this case, comprised of related ICE/CED-3 family members (Fig. 4).


FOOTNOTES

*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant CA64803 and Grant CA68769 (to K. Orth). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
Fellow of the Medical Scientist Training Program, supported by the Experimental Immunopathology Training Grant.

Established Investigator of the American Heart Association. To whom correspondence should be addressed: The University of Michigan Medical School, Dept. of Pathology, 1301 Catherine St., Box 0602, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. Tel.: 313-747-2921; Fax: 313-764-4308; :vmdixit{at}umich.edu.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: ICE, interleukin-1beta converting enzyme; IL, interleukin; PARP, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Peter H. Krammer and Marcus E. Peter for the anti-APO-1 antibody and John C. Reed and Seamus J. Martin for providing the vector and Bcl-2 transfected CEM cell lines. We are grateful to Yongping Kuang and Ian Jones for technical assistance and help in preparation of the manuscript.


REFERENCES

  1. Ellis, R. E., Yuan, J., and Horvitz, H. R. (1991) Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 7, 663-698 [CrossRef]
  2. Steller, H. (1995) Science 267, 1445-1449 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Thompson, C. B. (1995) Science 267, 1456-1462 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Ellis, H. M., and Horvitz, H. R. (1986) Cell 44, 817-829 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Hengartner, M. O., Ellis, R. E., and Horvitz, H. R. (1992) Nature 356, 494-499 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Hengartner, M. O., and Horvitz, H. R. (1994) Cell 76, 665-676 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Yuan, J., Shaham, S., Ledoux, S., Ellis, H. M., and Horvitz, H. R. (1993) Cell 75, 641-652 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Vaux, D. L. (1993) Curr. Biol. 3, 877-878 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Nunez, G., and Clarke, M. F. (1994) Trends Cell Biol. 4, 399-403 [CrossRef]
  10. Reed, J. C. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 124, 1-6 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Thornberry, N. A., Bull, H. G., Calaycay, J. R., Chapman, K. T., Howard, A. D., Kostura, M. J., Miller, D. K., Molineaux, S. M., Weidner, J. R., Aunins, J., Elliston, K. O., Ayala, J. M., Casano, F. J., Chin, J., Ding, G. J.-F., Egger, L. A., Gaffney, E. P., Limjuco, G., Palyha, O. C., Raju, S. M., Rolando, A. M., Salley, J. P., Yamin, T.-T., Lee, T. D., Shively, J. E., MacCross, M., Mumford, R. A., Schmidt, J. A., and Tocci, M. J. (1992) Nature 356, 768-774 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Cerretti, D. P., Kozlosky, C. J., Mosley, B., Nelson, N., Ness, K. V., Greenstreet, T. A., March, C. J., Kronheim, S. R., Druck, T., Cannizzaro, L. A., Huebner, K., and Black, R. A. (1992) Science 256, 97-100 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Miura, M., Zhu, H., Rotello, R., Hartwieg, E. A., and Yuan, J. (1993) Cell 75, 653-660 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Kuida, K., Lippke, J. A., Ku, G., Harding, M. W., Livingston, D. J., Su, M. S.-S., and Flavell, R. A. (1995) Science 267, 2000-2003 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Li, P., Allen, H., Banerjee, S., Franklin, S., Herzog, L., Johnston, C., McDowell, J., Paskind, M., Rodman, L., Salfeld, J., Towne, E., Tracey, D., Wardwell, S., Wei, F.-Y., Wong, W., Kamen, R., and Seshadri, T. (1995) Cell 80, 401-411 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Kumar, S., Kinoshita, M., Noda, M., Copeland, N. G., and Jenkins, N. A. (1994) Genes & Dev. 8, 1613-1626
  17. Wang, L., Miura, M., Bergeron, L., Zhu, H., and Yuan, J. (1994) Cell 78, 739-750 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Tewari, M., Quan, L. T., O'Rourke, K., Desnoyers, S., Zeng, Z., Beidler, D. R., Poirier, G. G., Salvesen, G. S., and Dixit, V. M. (1995) Cell 81, 801-809 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Nicholson, D. W., Ali, A., Thornberry, N. A., Vaillancourt, J. P., Ding, C. K., Gallant, M., Gareau, Y., Griffin, P. R., Labelle, M., Lazebnik, Y. A., Munday, N. A., Raju, S. M., Smulson, M. E., Yamin, T.-T., Yu, V. L., and Miller, D. K. (1995) Nature 376, 37-43 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Fernandes-Alnemri, T., Litwack, G., and Alnemri, E. S. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 30761-30764 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Munday, N. A., Vaillancourt, J. P., Ali, A., Casano, F. J., Miller, D. K., Molineaux, S. M., Yamin, T. T., Yu, V. L., and Nicholson, D. W. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 15870-15876 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Kamens, J., Paskind, M., Hugunin, M., Talanian, R. V., Allen, H., Banach, D., Bump, N., Hackett, M., Johnston, C. G., Li, P., Mankovich, J. A., Terranova, M., and Ghayur, T. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 15250-15256 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Faucheu, C., Diu, A., Chan, A. W., Blanchet, A. M., Miossec, C., Herve, F., Collard-Dutilleul, V., Gu, Y., Aldape, R. A., Lippke, J. A., Rocher, C., Su, S.-S. M., Livingston, D. J., Hercend, T., and Lulanne, J. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 1914-1922 [Abstract]
  24. Fernandes-Alnemri, T., Litwack, G., and Alnemri, E. S. (1995) Cancer Res. 55, 2737-2742 [Abstract]
  25. Duan, H., Chinnaiyan, A. M., Hudson, P. L., Wing, J. P., He, W., and Dixit, V. M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 1621-1625 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Fernandes-Alnemri, T., Takahashi, A., Armstrong, R., Krebs, J., Fritz, L., Tomaselli, K. J., Wang, L., Yu, Z., Croce, C. M., Salvesen, G., Earnshaw, W. C., Litwack, G., and Alnemri, E. S. (1995) Cancer Res. 55, 6045-6052 [Abstract]
  27. Xue, D., and Horvitz, H. R. (1995) Nature 377, 248-251 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Tewari, M., and Dixit, V. M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 3255-3260 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Trauth, B. C., Klas, C., Peters, A. M. J., Matzku, S., Moller, P., Falk, W., Debatin, K.-M., and Krammer, P. H. (1989) Science 245, 301-305 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Lamarre, D., Talbot, B., Murcia, G. D., Laplante, C., Leduc, Y., Mazen, A., and Poirier, G. G. (1988) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 950, 147-160 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Martin, S. J., Newmeyer, D. D., Mathias, S., Farschon, D. M., Wang, H., Reed, J. C., and Green, D. R. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 5191-5200 [Abstract]
  32. Bertrand, R., Solary, E., O'Conner, P., Kohn, K. W., and Pommier, Y. (1994) Exp. Cell Res. 211, 314-321 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Jacobson, M. D., and Raff, M. C. (1995) Nature 374, 814-816 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Jacobson, M. D., Burne, J. F., and Raff, M. C. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 1899-1910 [Abstract]
  35. Martin, S. J., Takayama, S., McGahon, A. J., Miyashita, T., Corbeil, J., Kolesnick, R. N., Reed, J. C., and Green, D. R. (1995) Cell Death Differ. 2, 253-257
  36. Memon, S. A., Moreno, M. B., Petrak, D., and Zacharchuk, C. M. (1995) J. Immunol. 155, 4644-4652 [Abstract]
  37. Choi, M. S. K., Boise, L. H., Gottschalk, A. R., Quintans, J., Thompson, C. B., and Klaus, G. G. G. (1995) Eur. J. Immunol. 25, 1352-1357 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Los, M., Van de Craen, M., Penning, L. C., Schenk, H., Westendorp, M., Baeuerle, P. A., Droge, W., Krammer, P. H., Fiers, W., and Schulze-Osthoff, K. (1995) Nature 375, 81-83 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Enari, M., Hug, H., and Nagata, S. (1995) Nature 375, 78-81 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Haecker, G., and Vaux, D. L. (1994) Trends Biochem. Sci. 19, 99-100 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Darmon, A. J., Nicholson, D. W., and Bleackley, R. C. (1995) Nature 377, 446-448 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Quan, L. T., Tewari, M., O'Rourke, K., Dixit, V. M., Snipas, S. J., Poirier, G. G., Ray, C., Pickup, D. J., and Salvesen, G. S. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. , in press

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.