©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Pharmacologic Manipulation of ob Expression in a Dietary Model of Obesity (*)

(Received for publication, November 6, 1995; and in revised form, January 30, 1996)

Sheila Collins (§) Richard S. Surwit

From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and The Sarah W. Stedman Center for Nutritional Studies, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

Mutation of the obese (ob) gene results in severe hereditary obesity and diabetes in the C57BL/6J and related strains of mice. In this study we examined the expression of the ob gene in a dietary model in which moderate obesity develops in response to fat (58% of calories from fat) without mutation of the ob gene, and in four genetic models of obesity in mice: ob/ob, db/db, tubby, and fat. Several white and brown adipose depots were examined (epididymal, subcutaneous, perirenal, and interscapular). Northern blot analysis shows that levels of ob mRNA are increased in all adipose depots examined in every model of obesity. The average fold increases were 12.0 ± 2.1 (ob/ob), 4.8 ± 1.5 (db/db), 2.8 ± 0.1 (tubby), 2.4 ± 0.3 (fat), and 2.1 ± 0.2 (high fat diet-induced A/J). Moreover, we found that the expression of the ob gene could be manipulated by pharmacologically blocking the development of diet-induced obesity. Supplementation of a high fat diet with a beta(3)-adrenergic receptor agonist (CL316,243) prevented obesity, but not hyperphagia associated with high fat feeding (body weights of high fat-fed A/J mice = 34.0 ± 1.0 g; high fat plus CL316,243-fed mice = 26.8 ± 0.5 g; n = 10). CL316,243-treated, high fat-fed animals contained levels of ob mRNA in all adipose depots that were equal to or less than levels in low fat-fed mice (average levels in high fat plus CL316,243-fed mice relative to low fat-fed mice: 0.93 ± 0.09). Inasmuch as fat cell size, but not number, was increased in a previous study in diet-induced obese A/J mice, these results indicate that expression of the ob gene serves as a sensor of fat cell hypertrophy, independent of any effects on food intake.


INTRODUCTION

The recent cloning of the ob gene has led to renewed interest in the genetic basis of obesity(1) . This autosomal recessive mutation is most often expressed on the C57BL/6J (B/6J) background strain and is associated with severe obesity, hyperinsulinemia, hyperglycemia, hypercorticosteronemia, and infertility. Early studies by Coleman and Hummel (2) and Coleman (3) led to the proposal that ob may encode a diffusable signaling factor, while the product of a separate obesity mutation, db (``diabetic''), residing at a different chromosomal location, has been postulated to receive the signal from the diffusable factor; perhaps encoding a receptor for ob(4) . The cloning and sequence analysis of the ob locus suggests that the ob gene indeed encodes a protein that is secreted from adipocytes(1) . In the ob/ob mouse, a nonsense mutation in the coding region appears to prevent the production of a functional OB protein, and a marked up-regulation of ob mRNA has been observed in adipose tissue of ob/ob mice(1) . From these data, and because it is widely believed that obesity in the ob/ob mouse is caused by hyperphagia(5) , it has been proposed that this protein normally serves as a feedback regulator of satiety(1) . Support for this hypothesis has been provided by several recent studies in which ob/ob or db/db mice were administered recombinant OB protein(6, 7, 8) . Decreased food intake and body weight were observed in ob/ob mice, but the OB protein had no effect in db/db mice(7, 8) . However, in order to demonstrate that the OB protein truly serves a sensor function, the expression of ob protein must be shown to be modulated through alteration of fat mass. We now report that the expression of the ob gene can be increased by diet and adipocyte hypertrophy, and reduced by stimulation of beta(3)-adrenergic receptors (beta(3)AR), (^1)independent of effects on food intake. These data suggest that changes in ob gene expression do not predict changes in food intake.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Animals

All mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). ``Obese'' (ob/ob) and ``tubby'' (tub/tub) mutant mice on the C57Bl/6J (B/6J) background, and ``diabetic'' (db/db) and ``fat'' (fat/fat) mutants on the C57Bl/KsJ background, were obtained together with genetically lean (+/+) control animals at 10 weeks of age unless otherwise indicated in the text. These animals were provided free access to Purina mouse chow and water. For dietary obesity studies, the standard protocol of Surwit was followed(9, 10, 11) . A/J male mice were obtained at 4 weeks of age and were housed five per cage in a temperature-controlled room with reverse 12-h light/dark cycle. Water was available ad libitum. The animals were fed one of three diets as follows: 10 mice from each strain were placed on a low fat diet (10.5% calories from fat), a high fat diet (58% calories from fat), or a high fat diet containing 0.001% of the beta(3)AR agonist CL316,243 as described previously(12, 13) . (^2)The detailed composition of the diets and their caloric content has been described previously(11) . Body weight was assessed biweekly. Food intake measurements for individual animals, 10 per diet group, were performed for 24-h periods at weeks 2, 6, and 16 of the diet regimen. More frequent measurements were not performed due to the stress to the animals as a result of individual housing. All procedures were conducted in accordance with principles and guidelines established by the NIH for the care and use of laboratory animals.

RNA Preparation and Analysis

Adipose tissue was collected from the gonadal, subcutaneous, perirenal, and interscapular regions. Total cellular RNA was prepared from freshly isolated adipose tissue by the cesium chloride gradient method as previously detailed(14) . For Northern blot hybridization, RNA was denatured by the glyoxal procedure, fractionated through 1.2% agarose gels, and blotted onto Biotrans nylon membranes (ICN, Irvine, CA) as described previously (15) . A probe for the murine ob gene sequence was prepared by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The primers used were 5`-AAAACCCTCATCAAGACC-3` (sense) and 5`-CAACTGTTGAAGAATGTCC-3` (antisense) corresponding to nucleotide 209-226 and 598-580 of the sequence reported by Zhang et al.(1) . The reaction conditions were as follows. Epididymal adipose tissue RNA from C57BL/6J mice were incubated in a 20-µl reaction containing 50 mM Tris, 10 mM MgCl(2), and 1 unit of RNase-free DNase (U. S. Biochemical Corp., Cleveland, OH) for 30 min at 37 °C. The DNase was denatured by heating to 95 °C for 5 min. Two hundred and fifty ng of the RNA were then annealed to the antisense primer in a 20-µl reaction containing Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase and 5 mM MgCl(2), and incubated at 42 °C for 15 min, followed by 99 °C for 5 min to denature the enzyme. PCR was initiated by addition of the sense strand primer, 2.5 units of AmpliTaq polymerase and 10 times PCR buffer (final concentrations: 10 mM Tris, 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl(2)): 94 °C for 30 s, 57.5 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 1.5 min; 35 cycles. Amplification reactions without the initial reverse transcriptase step were included as controls. The 390-nucleotide PCR product was purified by agarose gel electrophoresis and subcloned into the plasmid vector T7-Blue (Novagen, Madison, WI). A probe for mouse glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase was obtained from Clontech (San Diego, CA) and a rat cDNA probe for cyclophilin was obtained from J. Douglas. Radiolabeled probes for hybridization were prepared by nick-translation with [P]deoxyCTP to a specific activity of between 3 and 7 times 10^8 dpm/µg of DNA. Blots were hybridized and washed as described previously(16) . Quantitation of hybridizing species was by exposure to Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager screens. Permanent data records were generated by exposing the blots to Kodak X-AR film at -80 °C.


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

As previously reported(1, 17) , ob gene expression was elevated in obese, diabetic ob/ob and db/db mice (Fig. 1). In the ob/ob mice, the increase ranged from 10- to 14-fold, while the overexpression in db/db mice was 4- to 8-fold. These values are somewhat less than reported by other investigators but consistent with their findings. Based upon the early studies by Coleman (2, 3) he proposed that ob encodes a diffusable signaling factor and that the db locus might encode the receptor for ob. Thus, persistently up-regulated expression of ob mRNA in the db/db diabetic mouse would be consistent with this model, in which db would be incapable of receiving the signal from ob. Support for this original hypothesis has recently been obtained from studies in which recombinant OB protein was administered to ob/ob and db/db mice(6, 7, 8) . In these studies, decreased food intake and body weight were observed in ob/ob mice, but the OB protein had no effect in db/db mice(7, 8) . These latter results support the notion that the db locus is down-stream in the pathway from ob. However, we and others have also observed significantly increased expression of the ob gene in other genetic models of obesity that do not possess mutations in the ob locus. For example, the levels of expression and nucleotide sequence of the ob gene from the Zucker ``fatty'' (fa/fa) rat have been examined(18, 19) . While similar increases in ob mRNA are observed in obese fa/fa rats, unlike ob/ob mice the ob gene from the Zucker fa/fa is not mutated. More recently, increased expression of ob in overweight humans without mutations of the ob gene has also been reported(20) . We examined ob expression in several white and brown adipose tissues from ``tubby'' (tub/tub) and ``fat'' (fat/fat) mutant mice(21) , including gonadal, subcutaneous, perirenal, and interscapular. The fat locus has recently been identified as carboxypeptidase E(22) , but the nature of the mutation in tubby has not yet been reported. These two animal models develop obesity more gradually with age and do not possess the severe hypercorticism that is such a prominent feature in ob/ob or db/db mice (21) . (^3)As shown in Fig. 2, ob mRNA was significantly increased in adipose tissue from tubby and fat mice as compared with genetically lean (``+'') littermates, although the degree of overexpression is less dramatic than in ob and db mice. Table 1presents the quantitative comparisons for individual adipose depots. The results demonstrate that, similar to ob and db animals, a high degree of adiposity in tubby and fat mice is associated with elevated levels of ob expression.


Figure 1: Overexpression of ob mRNA in genetically obese ob/ob and db/db mice. Northern blots containing 40 µg of total RNA from epididymal white adipose tissue (EWAT), or interscapular brown adipose tissue (IBAT) were prepared as pools from two or three animals as described under ``Experimental Procedures'' and hybridized successively with P-labeled probes for the mouse ob coding region and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gapdh). The position of the ob or gapdh mRNA is indicated by the arrowhead. A, comparison of genetically lean (+) C57BL/6J mice and obese (ob) mice. In the data shown, the level of ob mRNA is increased 14-fold in the ob/ob mutant (average of two experiments = 12.0 ± 2.1-fold increase). B, comparison of genetically lean (+/+) C57BL/KsJ mice and diabetic (db/db) mice. In the data shown, the level of ob mRNA is increased 4-fold in EWAT and 8-fold in the IBAT of the db/db mutant. The data shown are representative of two experiments.




Figure 2: Overexpression of ob mRNA in tubby and fat mutant mice. A, comparison of genetically lean (+) C57BL/6J mice and tubby (tub) mice. B, comparison of genetically lean (+) C57BL/KsJ mice and fat (fat) mice. Northern blots containing 30 µg of total RNA from the indicated adipose tissue depots were prepared as described under ``Experimental Procedures'' and hybridized successively with P-labeled probes for the mouse ob coding region and cyclophilin (cyclo): epididymal white adipose tissue (EWAT), interscapular brown adipose tissue (IBAT), subcutaneous (SQ), and perirenal (PR). The position of the ob or cyclo mRNA is indicated by the arrowhead.





Unlike these mutant strains of mice which develop severe obesity on laboratory chow, which is quite low in fat (4.5% of calories from fat, according to manufacturer, Purina), most human obesity is thought to occur in response to high fat diets(23, 24) . For this reason we have been studying the physiological and biochemical features of diet-induced obesity in genetically ``lean'' normal mice. We have previously reported that A/J mice will develop moderate obesity on a high fat diet(11) . Attempts to develop effective treatments for obesity have included several reports that beta(3)AR agonists are effective in reducing body weight and adipose tissue mass following acute treatment of ob/ob mice or diet-induced obese rats (13, 25, 26, 27) . Therefore we decided to test whether chronic supplementation of the high fat diet with a highly selective beta(3)AR agonist, CL 316,243(12) , could prevent diet-induced obesity in A/J mice and whether the effect could be sustained over prolonged treatment. The body weights of animals on the three diets are shown in Fig. 3. Compared with animals fed the low fat diet, the high fat-fed animals exhibited significant increases in total body weight even within the first 2 weeks. This trend continued throughout the 16 weeks of the experiment. However, animals consuming the high fat diet supplemented with the beta(3)AR agonist were resistant to the obesity-inducing effects of the fat in the diet (Fig. 3). In fact, they tended to weigh even less than animals consuming the low fat diet.


Figure 3: Obesity induced by high fat feeding and its prevention by a beta(3)AR agonist. Thirty A/J male mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratories at 4 weeks of age. Groups of 10 mice were randomly assigned to a low fat diet (circle), high fat diet (bullet), or high fat diet containing 0.001% CL316,243 (). Animals were weighed at biweekly intervals through the 16-week period on the diets.



We next examined the levels of ob mRNA in epididymal, subcutaneous, and perirenal white adipose tissue and interscapular brown adipose tissue from these animals (Fig. 4). Levels of ob mRNA in high fat-fed obese mice increased 1.48 ± 0.07-fold in epididymal, 2.45 ± 0.32-fold in subcutaneous, and 1.78 ± 0.13-fold in perirenal depots compared to low fat-fed control animals. In interscapular brown adipose tissue from high fat-fed animals some samples showed a modest elevation, but overall there was no significant increase (1.07 ± 0.19-fold) compared with low fat-fed mice. Most likely the levels of ob expression observed in this brown adipose depot are derived from small amounts of white adipocytes present in the tissue that we were unable to separate by visual inspection alone. By contrast to these increases seen in adipose tissue from the high fat-fed mice, these same adipose tissue regions from mice consuming the high fat diet supplemented with the beta(3)AR agonist expressed levels of ob mRNA that were equal to, or slightly less than, that observed in animals fed the low fat diet (0.93 ± 0.09-fold). Thus, these data suggest that we were able to manipulate the expression of the ob gene by pharmacologically blocking the development of diet-induced obesity, despite the consumption of a calorically rich diet.


Figure 4: Increased expression of ob mRNA in diet-induced obese A/J mice and its repression by a beta(3)AR agonist. Northern blots containing 40 µg of total RNA from the indicated adipose tissue depots were prepared from A/J animals consuming the low fat (LF) diet, or the high fat (HF) diet alone or supplemented with the beta(3)AR agonist CL316,243 (HF+CL): epididymal white adipose tissue (EWAT), interscapular brown adipose tissue (IBAT), subcutaneous (SQ), and perirenal (PR). The blots were hybridized successively with P-labeled probes for the mouse ob coding region and cyclophilin (cyclo). The position of the ob or cyclo mRNA is indicated by the arrowhead. The data shown are representative of three experiments. The average fold changes in ob mRNA are described in the text.



In our studies as well as those of other investigators, the fold increases in ob mRNA observed in either diet-induced obese A/J mice, or the severely obese ob/ob or db/db, are consistently greater than would be predicted based upon increase in total body weight alone. For example, we observe a 25% increase in body weight of A/J mice consuming a high fat diet, but there is a 50-250% increase in ob mRNA levels. Similarly, ob/ob mice generally display a 75-100% increase in body weight(4) , but a 10-20-fold increase in ob mRNA levels (1, 17) (Fig. 1). When we examined fat pad weights in A/J mice raised on these three diets, the average increase over all depots in high fat fed animals increased by 2.30 ± 0.30 (n = 3), while in the presence of the beta(3)AR agonist, average fat pad weights were essentially identical to low fat-fed animals (fold change = 1.03 ± 0.13; n = 3). These values are very similar to the changes observed in ob mRNA levels in this study.

In a previous study we have shown that high fat feeding in A/J mice causes adipocyte hypertrophy, but not hyperplasia(11) . Therefore, the differences in weight in A/J mice raised on high fat diets with and without the beta(3)AR agonist CL316,243 are most likely due to differences in adipocyte size between the groups, but not in number. Thus, the difference in ob mRNA in these mice, compared to those raised on fat alone, suggests that OB is a ``sensor'' of fat cell size presumably sending a signal, either autocrine, paracrine, or endocrine to elicit some metabolic response; possibly to control energy partitioning and utilization. Interestingly, A/J animals consuming the high fat diet supplemented with the beta(3)AR agonist, CL316,243, also display increases in brown adipose tissue content and beta(3)AR gene expression. (^4)

Recent research has emphasized the role of leptin in satiety(6, 7, 8) . In these studies decreased food intake and body weight were observed in ob/ob mice, but the OB protein had no effect in db/db mice. Campfield et al.(8) also found that administration of recombinant OB protein to diet-induced obese AKR/J mice caused reductions in food intake and body weight, although to a more modest degree than in ob/ob mice. To understand the relationship between food intake and ob gene expression in our dietary model and the effects of a beta(3)AR agonist, we examined food intake in individual animals from all three diet groups at three times during the study period (Fig. 5). These data show that the caloric intake of animals on either of the high fat diets was equivalent and greater than that consumed by animals fed the low fat diet. However, despite this greater caloric density of the high fat diet, animals supplemented with CL316,243 actually weighed less than low fat fed animals. Therefore, our experiments appear to highlight a disassociation between ob gene expression and caloric consumption. In summary, we have shown that A/J mice consuming a high fat diet produce more leptin and become moderately obese, while mice consuming the high fat diet supplemented with CL316,243 do not become obese or show increases in ob gene expression, despite the fact that they consumed as much, or more, food than animals on high fat alone. It is possible that treatment with CL316,243 may serve to mimic effects of OB protein involved in enhancing metabolic and/or thermogenic activity, as recently speculated(28) . Therefore, because food intake in animals fed high fat diets with and without the beta(3)-agonist was similar, these results indicate that there is no apparent obligatory effect of OB protein on satiety.


Figure 5: Food intake. Food intake measurements over a 24-h period were made for individual animals at three different times during study (2, 6, and 16 weeks on the diets). Each group of 10 animals was housed individually and grams of food consumed over 24 h were measured. Caloric content of each diet was calculated based on 5.55 kcal/g for the high fat diets and 4.07 kcal/g for the low fat diet. #, significantly different from low fat-fed animals at p < 0.05. *, significantly different from low fat-fed and high fat-fed animals at week 6 and from low fat-fed animals at week 16, p < 0.005.




FOOTNOTES

*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants DK46793 (to S. C.), DK49066, DK43106, and MHK0500303 (to R. S. S.), and the March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation FY94-0563 (to S. C.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Box 3557, Duke University Medical Center Durham, NC 27710. Tel.: 919-684-8991; Fax: 919-684-3071.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: beta(3)AR, beta(3)-adrenergic receptor; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

(^2)
T. H. Claus, personal communication.

(^3)
P. Nishina, personal communication.

(^4)
S. Collins, manuscript in preparation.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. Thomas Claus and Elliott Danforth for the gift of CL316,243, Dr. Patsy Nishina for tubby and fat mice, and Kiefer Daniel and Ann Petro for excellent technical assistance.


REFERENCES

  1. Zhang, Y., Proenca, R., Maffei, M., Barone, M., Leopold, L., and Friedman, J. M. (1994) Nature 372, 425-432 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Coleman, D. L., and Hummel, K. P. (1969) Am. J. Physiol. 215, 1298-1304
  3. Coleman, D. L. (1973) Diabetologia 9, 294-298 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Coleman, D. L. (1982) Diabetes 31, 1-6 [Abstract]
  5. Rink, T. J. (1994) Nature 372, 406-407 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Pelleymounter, M. A., Cullen, M. J., Baker, M. B., Hecht, R., Winters, D., Boone, T., and Collins, F. (1995) Science 269, 540-543 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Halaas, J. L., Gajiwala, K. S., Maffei, M., Cohen, S. L., Chait, B. T., Rabinowitz, D., Lallone, R. L., Burley, S. K., and Friedman, J. M. (1995) Science 269, 543-546 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Campfield, L. A., Smith, F. J., Guisez, Y., Devos, R., and Burn, P. (1995) Science 269, 546-549 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Surwit, R. S., Kuhn, C. M., Cochrane, C., McCubbin, J. A., and Feinglos, M. N. (1988) Diabetes 37, 1163-1167 [Abstract]
  10. Surwit, R. S., Seldin, M. F., Kuhn, C. M., Cochrane, C., and Feinglos, M. N. (1991) Diabetes 40, 82-87 [Abstract]
  11. Surwit, R. S., Feinglos, M. N., Rodin, J., Sutherland, A., Petro, A. E., Opala, E. C., Kuhn, C. M., and Rebuffe-Scrive, M. (1995) Metabolism 44, 645-651 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Bloom, J. D., Dutia, M. D., Johnson, B. D., Wissner, A., Burns, M. G., Largis, E. E., Dolan, J. A., and Claus, T. H. (1992) J. Med. Chem. 35, 3081-3084 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Largis, E. E., Burns, M. G., Muenkel, H. A., Dolan, J. A., and Claus, T. H. (1994) Drug Dev. Res. 32, 69-76
  14. Chirgwin, J. M., Przybyla, A. E., MacDonald, R. J., and Rutter, W. J. (1979) Biochemistry 18, 5294-5299 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Collins, S., Caron, M. G., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 9067-9070 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Thomas, P. S. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 77, 5201-5205 [Abstract]
  17. Maffei, M., Fei, H., Lee, G.-H., Dani, C., Leroy, P., Zhang, Y., Proenca, R., Negrel, R., Ailhaud, G., and Friedman, J. M. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 6957-6960 [Abstract]
  18. Murakami, T., and Shima, K. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 209, 944-952 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Ogawa, Y., Masuzaki, H., Isse, N., Okazaki, T., Mori, K, Shigemoto, M., Satoh, N., Tamura, N., Hosoda, K., and Yoshimasa, Y. (1995) J. Clin. Invest. 96, 1647-1652 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Considine, R. V., Considine, E. L., Williams, C. J., Nyce, M. R., Magosin, S. A., Bauer, T. L., Rosato, E. L., Colberg, J., and Caro, J. F. (1995) J. Clin. Invest. 96, 2720-2728
  21. Coleman, D. L., and Eicher, E. M. (1990) J. Hered. 81, 424-427 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Naggert, J. K., Fricker, L. D., Varlamov, O., Nishina, P. M., Rouille, Y., Steiner, D. F., Carroll, R. J., Paigen, B. J., and Leiter, E. H. (1995) Nat. Genet. 10, 135-142 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Astrup, A., Buemann, B., Western, P., Toubro, S., Raben, A., and Christensen, N. J. (1994) Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 59, 350-355 [Abstract]
  24. Sims, E. A. H. (1989) Med. Clin. North Am. 73, 97-110 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Arch, J. R. S, Ainsworth, A. T., Cawthorne, M. A., Piercy, V., Sennitt, M. V., Thody, W. E., Wilson, C., and Wilson, S. (1984) Nature 309, 163-165 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Meier, M. K., Alig, L., Burgi-Saville, and Muller, M. (1984) Int. J. Obes. 8, Suppl. 1, 215-225
  27. Himms-Hagen, J., Cui, J., Danforth, E., Taatjes, D. J., Lang, S. S., Waters, B. L., and Claus, T. H. (1994) Am. J. Physiol. 266, R1371-R1382
  28. Ezzell, C. (1995) J. Natl. Inst. Health Res. 7, 39-43

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.