©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Isolation and Characterization of an Endogenous Peptide from Rat Brain Interacting Specifically with the Serotonergic 1B Receptor Subtypes (*)

(Received for publication, April 20, 1995; and in revised form, September 25, 1995)

Jean-Claude Rousselle (1) Olivier Massot (1) Muriel Delepierre (2) Emilie Zifa (1) Bernard Rousseau (3) Gilles Fillion (1)(§)

From the  (1)Unité de Pharmacologie Neuro-Immuno-Endocrinienne and the (2)Laboratoire de Résonance Magnétique Nucléaire, Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris, France and the (3)Service des Molécules Marquées, Biologie Cellulaire et Moleculaire, Centre de Saclay, 91191 Gif sur Yvette, France

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

The existence of endogenous compounds interacting with the serotonergic system was previously postulated. In the present work, rat brain tissues were extracted by acidic and organic procedures. The resulting extract was tested for its capacity to interact with the binding of [^3H]5-hydroxytryptamine ([^3H]5-HT) to 5-HT(1) receptors. Compounds responsible for the observed inhibitory activities were isolated and purified by high pressure liquid chromatography.

A tetrapeptide corresponding to a novel amino acid sequence Leu-Ser-Ala-Leu (LSAL) was identified. It reduces the binding of [^3H]5-HT to 5-HT(1) receptors at low concentration (IC = 10M). This effect corresponds to a specific interaction at 5-HT receptors since LSAL does not significantly affect other neurotransmitter bindings. LSAL appears heterogeneously distributed throughout the brain (hippocampus > cerebellum > striatum > brain stem) and in peripheral tissues (kidney > lung > stomach > blood > liver > spleen).

Two other peptides, Leu-Ser (LS) and Ala-Leu (AL), were also purified. They hardly affected [^3H]5-HT binding compared with LSAL. They presumably represent degradation products of the functional peptide LSAL. The fact that LSAL interacts specifically with 5-HT receptors that inhibit the release of neurotransmitters and particularly that of 5-HT itself suggests that this peptide may be involved in mechanisms controlling 5-HT neurotransmission and, accordingly, may play an important role in pathophysiological functions related to 5-HT activity.


INTRODUCTION

The serotonergic system is thought to play an important role in mental disorders and particularly in depression(1) . For a long time, it had been proposed that this pathology was related to a deficit in the serotonergic transmission(2, 3) . Accordingly, antidepressant drugs essentially restore a normal level of 5-HT (^1)activity. Antidepressant drugs can be classified into groups according to their primary mode of action, i.e. monoamine oxidase inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors(4) .

Furthermore, it was also shown that antidepressant drugs could act on 5-HT(1) receptors(5, 6, 7) . The corresponding mechanism of interaction was shown to be noncompetitive suggesting that a site, distinct from that actually binding the amine, existed on these receptors and specifically recognized these drugs and possibly endogenous ligands(5) .

Among 5-HT(1) receptors, 5-HT receptors, located on rat serotonergic neuron terminals, play a crucial role in regulating the release of the amine(8) . In non-rodents, 5-HT receptors, which are the species homolog of rodent 5-HT, play the same functional role(9, 10) . Experiments carried out in rat in in vitro assays showed that several antidepressants specifically interacted with 5-HT receptor subtypes (11, 12, 13) modifying their sensitivity after long term treatment (14, 15, 16, 17, 18) .

According to these results, the hypothesis of the existence of an endogenous factor acting at 5-HT(1) receptors was postulated. Thus, we explored this hypothesis in examining the capacity of various fractions, isolated from brain extracts, to interact with 5-HT(1) binding sites.

Herein, we report the isolation and characterization of a cerebral compound, which specifically interacts with 5-HT binding sites.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

Male Wistar rats (150-200 g) were obtained from IFFA CREDO (France). Bovine brains were collected at the slaughterhouse. [^3H]8-OH-DPAT (3.7 TBq/mmol), [^3H]ketanserin (2.22 TBq/mmol), [^3H]BRL 43694 (1.85 TBq/mmol), [^3H]DOB (0.37 TBq/mmol), and [^3H]choline (3 TBq/mmol) were purchased from DuPont NEN. [^3H]5-HT (3.26 TBq/mmol), I-cyanopindolol (81.4 TBq/mmol), [^3H]spiroperidol (0.55 TBq/mmol), [^3H]quinuclidinyl benzylate (3.33 TBq/mmol), [^3H]naloxone (1.48 TBq/mmol), [^3H]mepyramine (0.74 TBq/mmol), [^3H]prazosin (2.59 TBq/mmol), [^3H]dihydroalprenolol (3.33 TBq/mmol), [^3H]flunitrazepam (2.22 TBq/mmol), [-^3H]aminobutyric acid (3.33 TBq/mmol), [^3H]dopamine (185 GBq/mmol), and [^3H]noradrenaline (444 GBq/mmol) came from Amersham Corp. [^3H]LSAL (4.14 TBq/mmol) was synthesized by the Service des Molécules Marquées, CEA-CEN.

The TSK HW 40S column was obtained from Merck, and the Sephadex G resin was from Pharmacia Biotech Inc. The C(18) Ultrabase and Hypercarb column were purchased from SFCC-Shandon. Synthetic peptides came from Bachem for AL and LS and Neosystem for LSAL.

Rat Brain Extracts

Assays were carried out using brain tissue usually prepared from 60 rats (about 90 g). The tissues were lyophilized and homogenized with an Ultraturrax apparatus (Ikka Werk) in 10 volumes (w/v) of H(2)O containing 2 mM EDTA, 5 IU/liter aprotinin, and 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. The homogenate was centrifuged at 17,500 times g for 40 min at 4 °C. The resulting supernatant was kept at 4 °C, and the pellet was washed two additional times. The three supernatants were then pooled, lyophilized, and resuspended in 6 volumes (v/original weight) of 1 M acetic acid. After a stirring period of 40 min at 4 °C, the mixture was centrifuged (17,500 times g for 40 min at 4 °C), and the supernatant was lyophilized. An additional extraction was performed in 2 volumes (v/original weight) of 75% acetone. After centrifugation (17,500 times g for 20 min. at 4 °C), the resulting supernatant was evaporated under vacuum at 40 °C in a rotavapor apparatus (R110, Büchi). The dried extract was then resuspended in 50 ml of H(2)O and ultracentrifuged (120,000 times g for 60 min at 25 °C). The upper lipid phase was discarded, and the supernatant was lyophilized and stored at -70 °C until use.

Localization of Biological Activity

At the completion of each following chromatographic step, an aliquot of each collected fraction (1%) was tested for its ability to displace the binding of [^3H]5-HT to the 5-HT(1) and 5-HT binding sites(20) . Rat brain cortical membranes were incubated in a 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4, containing 0.1% ascorbic acid, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, 4 mM CaCl(2), 1 µM pargyline, 5 nM [^3H]5-HT with (5-HT) or without (5-HT(1)) 0.1 µM 8-OH-DPAT, in the presence/absence of the various fractions separated by the chromatographic procedure. Incubation was carried out for 30 min at 25 °C in a total volume of 1 ml. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 10 µM of 5-HT. At the end of the incubation period, free and bound radioactivities were separated by filtration under vacuum on Whatman GF/B glass fiber filters. Each tested tube was then washed twice with 5 ml of ice-cold incubation buffer. The bound radioactivity retained on the filter was measured by liquid scintillation counting (spectrometer Beta IV, Kontron). Active fractions were then pooled and lyophilized before injection in the next chromatographic column.

Isolation of the Rat F(1) Fraction

The crude extract of rat brains was dissolved in 5 ml of 50 mM ammonium acetate buffer, pH 5, loaded onto a TSK HW 40S column (700 times 26 mm; M(r) separation range: 10,000-1,000) equilibrated in the same buffer, and eluted at a flow rate of 2 ml/min. UV absorption was measured at 280 nm, and 60 fractions of 5 min each were collected.

Separation of Rat P, P(1), and P(2) Fractions

Fractions 12-24 of the TSK HW 40S column were pooled, lyophilized, and resuspended in 5 ml of 50 mM ammonium acetate buffer, pH 5. Aliquots (1 ml) were injected into a C(18) Ultrabase reverse phase column (250 times 10 mm), equilibrated in the same buffer. The elution was performed at a flow rate of 4 ml/min with a linear gradient of acetonitrile (0-12%) followed by a 5-min step gradient (50% acetonitrile). The detection wavelength was 240 nm. Thirty fractions of 1 min were collected. For all the following chromatographic steps, absorbance was measured at 230 nm (except when indicated).

Purification of Rat P Fraction

P fraction obtained from the C(18) Ultrabase chromatographic step was dissolved in 2 ml of a 10 mM ammonium acetate buffer, pH 5, and loaded onto a Sephadex G column (450 times 16 mm; M(r) separation range: 5,000-500). Elution was performed at a flow rate of 0.3 ml/min with the same buffer. The chromatogram was monitored at 280 nm, and 50 fractions of 20 min were collected. A reverse phase HPLC column (C(18) Ultrabase, 250 times 10 mm) was then used. The equilibrating buffer consisted of a mixture of ammonium acetate (50 mM, pH 5) and acetonitrile (85:15). The elution was performed with a 15-min linear gradient of acetonitrile (15-25%) followed by a 5-min step gradient at 50% acetonitrile at a flow rate of 4 ml/min. 20 fractions of 1 min were then collected. After lyophilization, the active fraction was injected into a carbon column (Hypercarb, 100 times 3 mm) and eluted with a 50 mM ammonium acetate buffer, pH 5. A 30-min linear gradient of acetonitrile (0-30%) was used. The flow rate was 1 ml/min, and 40 fractions of 1 min were collected. Final purification step consisted of a reverse phase chromatography using a C(18) Ultrabase column (150 times 4 mm) under isocratic elution conditions (0.5% trifluoroacetic acid, pH 2.5, and acetonitrile (83:17)) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. The active fraction was collected manually.

Bovine Brain Extract

The same purification procedure was carried out, i.e. acidic and organic extractions, gel permeation on TSK HW 40S, and C(18) Ultrabase separations. Two bovine brains (about 600 g; 35.21 ± 0.62 g of protein equivalent) were thus processed, which led to the recovery of three fractions having precisely the same retention time as rat P, P(1), and P(2) fractions.

Purification of Bovine P(1) Fraction

P(1) fraction was first loaded on the Sephadex G column. The elution procedure was the same as for rat P fraction. The active fractions were loaded onto a C(18) Ultrabase column (250 times 10 mm) equilibrated in a 50 mM ammonium acetate buffer, pH 5. Elution was run at 4 ml/min using a linear gradient of acetonitrile (20 min, from 0 to 5%) followed by a 10-min step gradient at 30% acetonitrile. Thirty fractions of 1 min were collected. This chromatographic step was repeated three times. Active fractions were then subjected to a Hypercarb column (100 times 3 mm) in the same buffer conditions. A 60-min linear gradient of acetonitrile was used (0-30%) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. Sixty fractions of 1 min were collected. Two further separations on the same column, using isocratic elutions with a 50 mM ammonium acetate buffer, pH 5, at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min, were required to achieve the purification of P(1) fraction.

Purification of Bovine P(2) Fraction

The first separation step was a gel filtration on a Sephadex G column. Chromatographic conditions were identical to those used for rat P and bovine P(1) fractions. Then active fractions were injected in a C(18) Ultrabase column (250 times 10 mm). The mobile phase was a 50 mM ammonium acetate buffer, pH 5. Elution was carried out using a linear gradient of acetonitrile (40 min., from 0 to 10%) followed by a 10-min step gradient at 30% acetonitrile. The flow rate was 4 ml/min, and 50 fractions of 1 min were collected. A Hypercarb column (100 times 3 mm), equilibrated in the same buffer, was then used. A 35-min gradient of acetonitrile (0-20% in 30 min, 5 min at 30%) was carried out at 1 ml/min, and 40 fractions of 1 min were collected. Finally, active fraction was reinjected in the same column, and an isocratic elution was performed with a 50 mM ammonium acetate buffer, pH 5, at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min.

Amino Acid Analysis

Amino acid contents of bovine P(1) and P(2) fractions were determined after a 24-h hydrolysis in 6 N HCl at 120 °C. A model 6300 Beckman apparatus was used. Amino acid separation was performed on a C(18) reverse phase column after cadmium-ninhydride reaction. Norleucine was used as an internal standard.

NMR Analysis

The content of the various purified fractions (P, P(1), P(2)) and their chemical structures (P(1), P(2)) were examined in D(2)O and dimethylsulfoxide using a 500-MHz NMR spectrometer (Varian).

Protein Sequencing

The sequence of the purified rat P fraction was determined using a 473 Applied Biosystems protein sequencer using a microcartridge. Chemicals and methods were those recommended by the manufacturer.

Sequence Comparison

Purified peptide sequence was compared with those published in the Swissprot protein bank (Genetic Computer Group, Inc).

Protein Measurement

The protein equivalents were measured by the Lowry method(19) . The standard curve was established with bovine serum albumin.

Pharmacological Studies

Interaction of the purified P fraction (1% of the total preparation) or synthetic LSAL (1 nM or increasing concentrations (10 to 10M)) was examined either at various 5-HT receptors or on other neurotransmitter receptors. Experiments were carried out on rat (or bovine when indicated) brain cortical membranes in a total volume of 1 ml.

Rat brain cortices were dissected on ice and rapidly homogenized for 30 s with an Ultraturrax apparatus (Ikka Werk) in a 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4, containing 2 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 5 IU/liter aprotinin. Homogenates were then incubated for 10 min at 37 °C to remove endogenous ligands, diluted in 30 volumes (v/w) of the same medium, and centrifuged (17,500 times g at 4 °C for 10 min). The pellet was resuspended in 30 volumes of the same buffer and centrifuged as described above. The homogenate was then washed an additional time, and the resulting pellet was resuspended in the appropriate incubation buffer. Incubation buffers and the different specific radiolabeled ligands are described in Table 1according to the literature(20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32) . Binding assays were performed after 30 min of incubation at 25 °C with 500 µg of protein equivalents/incubate except for the one using I-cyanopindolol, which was incubated for 60 min at 37 °C in the presence of 25 µg of proteins. At the end of the incubation period, the tubes were cooled on ice for 10 min and filtered under vacuum on Whatman GF/B glass fiber filters. Each filter was then washed twice with 5 ml of ice-cold incubation buffer and dried. The radioactivity retained on the filters was then measured either by liquid scintillation counting as described previously (for tritiated radioligands) or by -counting (for iodinated radioligand) (Spectrometer Crystal multidetector radioimmune assay system, Packard).



The uptake of 5-HT, dopamine, noradrenaline, -aminobutyric acid, and choline were measured on rat cortical synaptosomes prepared according to the method of Cotman and Matthews(33) . Synaptosomes were incubated for 15 min at 37 °C in an oxygenated Krebs-Ringer buffer, pH 7.4 (118 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 1.17 mM KH(2)PO(4), 1.22 mM CaCl(2), 1.25 mM MgSO(4), 25 mM NaHCO(3), and 10 mM glucose) in the presence of 20 nM of the different neurotransmitters with or without aliquots of the purified P fraction (1% of the total preparation) or increasing concentrations of the synthetic LSAL (10 to 10M). The final incubation volume was 250 µl. Passive uptake was measured at 4 °C. Uptake reactions were stopped by the addition of 2 ml of ice-cold incubation buffer (4 °C). Incubates were rapidly filtered under vacuum on Whatman GF/B glass fiber filters. Each filter was washed with 15 ml of cold incubation buffer (4 °C) and dried. The radioactivity retained on the filters was then measured by liquid scintillation counting.

Stability of LSAL

3 µCi of labeled LSAL were added to the rat cerebral homogenate and extracted as described previously. A blank of extraction was also carried out in the absence of cerebral material. 10% aliquots of the radioactive extracts were then analyzed on a C(18) reverse phase column (C(18) Ultrabase, 150times4 mm) equilibrated with an ammonium acetate buffer (50 mM, pH 5). Elution was run at 1 ml/min with an isocratic step of 3 min followed by a linear gradient of acetonitrile (0-30% in 30 min) and a 5-min step gradient at 50% acetonitrile. Forty fractions of 1 min each were collected, and the radioactivity was measured by liquid scintillation counting.

The retention time of [^3H]LSAL under the same experimental conditions was determined by a control injection.


RESULTS

Extractions

Brain extracts were prepared (from about 90 g of tissue) using the usual extraction procedure, i.e. 1 M acetic acid and 75% acetone extractions and ultracentrifugation. The crude homogenate contained an equivalent of 5.3 ± 0.2 g of proteins (mean ± S.E. of three independent determinations). At the various extraction steps, the recovery of the protein equivalent was 1.1 ± 0.1 g in the H(2)O supernatant, 0.54 ± 0.03 g in the acidic extract, 0.39 ± 0.01 g in the acetonic extract, and 0.049 ± 0.003 g in the final ultracentrifugation supernatant. The resulting crude material obtained is essentially deproteinized and delipidated.

Isolation of the Rat F(1) Fraction

Size exclusion chromatography on a TSK HW 40S column was carried out. This chromatographic step allowed to isolate two biological active fractions able to interact with the binding of [^3H]5-HT to 5-HT sites (Fig. 1); the first fraction (F(1)) eluted at 80 min and corresponded to a material having an apparent molecular weight of 4,000 determined on the basis of protein or peptide standard elutions. The second active fraction had an elution time of 540 min and a low apparent molecular weight (less than 500). Using [^3H]5-HT as an internal standard, this second fraction was identified as endogenous 5-HT.


Figure 1: Size exclusion chromatography of rat brain extract. Rat brain extract, prepared as described under ``Experimental Procedures,'' was loaded on the top of a TSK HW 40S column (700 times 26 mm; M(r) separation range: 10,000-1,000). The elution was performed at a flow rate of 2 ml/min with a 50 mM CH(3)COONH(4) buffer, pH 5. Absorbance was observed at 280 nm. Aliquots corresponding to 1% of each fraction were then tested for their abilities to displace [^3H]5-HT (5 nM) from its 5-HT binding sites on rat brain synaptosomal membranes (bullet-bullet). Each binding point is the mean ± S.E. of three independent determinations. A coinjection of [^3H]5-HT was realized under the same conditions as internal standard (-).



Isolation of Rat P, P(1), and P(2) Fractions

The separation of the F(1) fractions on a C(18) reverse phase column led to the recovery of an active fraction having a retention time of 21 min and called P fraction. Additional active fractions were also obtained. Their retention times were 3.30 min (NR), 9 min (P(1)), and 12 min (P(2)), respectively. They were distinct from endogenous 5-HT as controlled by using [^3H]5-HT (t(R)=17.45 min) (Fig. 2).


Figure 2: Reverse phase chromatography of rat F(1) fraction. 2 ml of rat F(1) fraction were injected in a C(18) Ultrabase column (250 times 10 mm). The elution was performed as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' 1% aliquots of each fraction were tested for their capacities to displace [^3H]5-HT (5 nM) from its 5-HT binding sites on rat brain synaptosomal membranes (bullet-bullet). Each point is the mean ± S.E. of three independent determinations. A coinjection of [^3H]5-HT was realized under the same conditions as internal standard (-).



The NR fraction was eluted in the void volume of the column. Further attempts to purify it, on reverse or normal phase, on ion exchange, or on hydrophobic columns, as well as on modified reverse phase columns, e.g. -NH(2), -OH, or -CN, did not lead to further separation. Moreover, dialysis of this fraction (membrane cut-off: 1,000) led to the loss of the activity. This result suggests that NR contains a high concentration of salts that interfere with the biological test.

P fraction represented the main activity inducing 83 ± 13% inhibition of the 5-HT binding (eight independent determinations). The two other fractions, P(1) and P(2), tested under the same experimental conditions, were less efficient (60 ± 5% and 30 ± 8% inhibition of the 5-HT binding, respectively, eight independent extracts) (Fig. 2).

Purification of Rat P Fraction

The purification of P fraction was carried out using size exclusion and reverse phase chromatographies (Fig. 3). A first step of purification was performed using a Sephadex G column, which possesses a suitable separation field, and led to the recovery of an active fraction having an elution time of 3.3 h. Successive reverse phase chromatographies (C(18) Ultrabase, Hypercarb, and C(18) Ultrabase) were required to obtain the final purification step corresponding to an apparent homogeneous fraction. Each step of separation led to the isolation of a single peak of activity. The use of a carbone column (Hypercarb, interactions) allowed us to separate P fraction from the majority of the material coeluted on a classical C(18) reverse phase (C(18) Ultrabase). At these last steps of purification, the corresponding retention times for P fraction were 5.30, 12.30, and 5.50 min for C(18) Ultrabase, Hypercarb, and C(18) Ultrabase columns, respectively (Fig. 3, B, C, and D).


Figure 3: Purification of rat P fraction. P fraction (rat) was purified by four successive chromatographic steps: Sephadex G (A), C(18) Ultrabase (B), Hypercarb column (C), C(18) Ultrabase (D). Chromatographic conditions were described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Biological activity (filled bars) was determined in duplicates on 1% aliquots as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' At each step of purification, the respective retention times of the P fraction were 3.30 h (A), 5.30 min (B), 12.30 min (C) and 5.5 min (D). The detection wavelengths were 280 (A) and 230 nm (B, C, and D).



Identification of Rat P Fraction

NMR technique demonstrated that the P fraction purified from rat brain extract was homogeneous and only contained a peptide (not shown). It was characterized by amino acid analysis and protein sequencing as LSAL. The amounts of LSAL determined by this analytic process were 500 and 1000 pmol for the two independent batches sequenced. The molecular weight of LSAL being 402.5, it represented a mean of 0.3 µg of the peptide. Thus, the purification index was greater than 10^9-fold (0.3 µg out of 60 rat brains corresponding to 90 g of wet weight).

The biological activities observed for rat P(1) and P(2) fractions were too low to identify them in further purification steps. Therefore, this attempt was made using bovine brains (600 g of initial material) that were extracted as described above. The extract also contained three active fractions corresponding to the same retention times as those already observed in the rat brain extract (Fig. 4, solid line). When the binding analysis was carried out on bovine brain cortical membranes instead of rat brain membranes, the same pattern of activity was observed (Fig. 4, dashed line). Moreover, the inhibitory effects of the three fractions were not significantly different from those measured on rat brain cortical membranes. Thus, bovine P(1) and P(2) fractions were purified using essentially the same purification procedure ( Fig. 5and 6).


Figure 4: Pattern of activity of the bovine F(1) fraction on reverse phase chromatography. 2 ml of bovine F(1) fraction were injected in a C(18) Ultrabase column (250 times 10 mm). The elution was performed as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' 1% aliquots of each fraction were tested for their capacities to displace [^3H]5-HT (5 nM) from its 5-HT binding sites on rat (solid line) or bovine (dashed line) brain cortical membranes. Each point is the mean ± S.E. of three independent determinations.




Figure 5: Purification of bovine P(1) fraction. Bovine P(1) fraction was purified by five successive chromatographic steps: Sephadex G (A), C(18) Ultrabase (B), and Hypercarb column (C, D, and E). Chromatographic conditions were described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Biological activity (filled bars) was determined in duplicates on 1% aliquots as described before. For each purification step, the respective retention times of the P(1) fraction were 5.30 h (A), 8.30 min (B), 3 min (C), and 2.5 min (D and E). The detection wavelengths were 280 nm (A) and 230 nm (B, C, D, and E).



Amino acid analysis of bovine P(1) and P(2) fractions showed that these compounds contained Leu, Ser, and Ala, Leu, respectively. A ratio of 0.82 (Ser:Leu) and 1.06 (Ala:Leu) between amino acids suggested that P(1) and P(2) fractions corresponded to dipeptidic structures. They were identified as peptide LS for P(1) fraction and peptide AL for P(2) fraction by two-dimensional NMR spectroscopic techniques. Spin systems were identified via through-bond connectivities (TOCSY) and sequential assignment was obtained via through-space connectivities (ROESY) showing unambiguously that the two amino acids were linked (not shown). Using norleucine as internal standard, amino acid analysis showed that P(1) and P(2) fractions represented relatively large amounts (200 µg for each of them) corresponding to a purification index of 4 times 10^6.

Stability of LSAL

The stability of LSAL during the different steps of the isolation procedure was tested using a labeled LSAL. Under our experimental conditions, 83 and 81% of the added radioactivities were recovered in the extraction control (blank extract) and the cerebral extract, respectively. The analysis of the content of these extracts on a reverse phase C(18) column showed that more than 80% of the recovered radioactivity corresponded to native LSAL (t(R) = 20.5 min) (85.4 and 83% for the blank and cerebral extracts, respectively). Two other minor peaks of radioactivity (t(R) = 13 min and t(R) = 26 min) were detected in both extracts. They represented less than 10% of the total radioactivity. In the brain extract, an additional peak (t(R) = 5 min, 4% of the total radioactivity) was observed (Fig. 7).


Figure 7: Stability of LSAL. 3 µCi of [^3H]LSAL were added to the buffer of homogenization (control of extraction or blank extract) or to the rat cerebral homogenate (cerebral extract) and submitted to the extraction process as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' The extracts were then analyzed on a C(18) reverse phase column (C(18) Ultrabase) as described previously. 40 fractions of 1 min were collected, and their radioactivity was counted in a liquid scintillation spectrometer after the addition of 4 ml of counting scintillant liquid (BCS, Amersham).



Pharmacological Specificity of Rat P Fraction

Aliquots of the purified P fraction (1% of the total fraction) were used to examine its pharmacological properties. This fraction specifically interacted with 5-HT(1) receptors. More precisely, it exhibited a specific interaction with the 5-HT receptor subtypes. Indeed, no significant inhibition was observed on other serotonergic receptor bindings (5-HT, 5-HT, 5-HT, 5-HT(3)) as well as on other neurotransmitter receptor bindings (Table 2). Moreover, at the same dose, the P fraction did not show any significant activity either on the uptake of 5-HT or that of other neurotransmitters (or their precursor), i.e. uptake of choline, -aminobutyric acid, noradrenaline, and dopamine (Table 2).



Regional Distribution of the P Fraction in Rat Brain and Peripheral Tissues

Tissues from 10 rats were extracted and partially purified to the step corresponding to the separation of the F(1) fraction on C(18) reverse phase chromatography (as represented in Fig. 2). The resulting P fractions were then tested for their abilities to inhibit 5-HT specific binding. A dose-response curve was established for each P fraction, and the corresponding ID was used as a measurement of the amount of LSAL in the fraction and expressed per gram of initial tissue (Table 3).



In brain, the hippocampal formation contained the highest amount of inhibitory activity, followed by cortex; intermediate levels were present in the striatum and cerebellum, whereas low levels were detected in the brain stem. The relative quantities per gram of original tissue were 14.28, 6.25, 2.22, 1.82, and 0.70 (arbitrary units), respectively (Table 3). In the periphery, the inhibitory activity was essentially found in kidney (2.5), heart (2.5), and lung (1.4). Low activities were detected in stomach (0.5) and blood (0.14), whereas it was undetectable in liver and spleen tissue (Table 3).

Synthetic Peptides

Binding assays measuring the inhibitory effect of synthetic LSAL on the [^3H]5-HT binding to 5-HT receptors showed an apparent affinity corresponding to an IC = 1.10M with a maximal effect reducing by 75-85% the specific binding. A very similar effect was observed on the binding of [I]iodocyanopindolol to the same receptor subtype (not shown). LSAL inhibits at higher concentrations the binding of [^3H]8-OH-DPAT to 5-HT receptors (IC = 1 µM) and is devoid of any significant activity on other 5-HT(1) receptor subtypes (5-HT, 5-HT) as well as on other serotonergic receptors (5-HT, 5-HT(3)) or on other neurotransmitter receptors (alpha and beta-adrenergic, D(2) dopaminergic, H(1) histaminergic, muscarinic, opiate, and benzodiazepine), even at 1 or 10 µM (Fig. 8, A and B). Moreover, LSAL did not show any activity on the uptake of different neurotransmitters or their precursors (serotonin, noradrenaline, dopamine, choline, and -aminobutyric acid) even at 10M (Fig. 8C).


Figure 8: Pharmacological specificity of the synthetic LSAL. A, interaction of LSAL with 5-HT receptors. Increasing concentrations of synthetic LSAL (10 to 10M) were incubated in the presence of various specific radiolabeled ligands on rat brain cortical membranes. Binding conditions were the same as for the purified P fraction (see Table 1). Each point is the mean ± S.E. of three independent determinations. This experiment was repeated twice. B, Interaction of LSAL with other receptors. Increasing concentrations of synthetic LSAL (10 to 10M) were incubated in the presence of various specific radiolabeled ligands on rat brain cortical membranes. Binding conditions were the same as for the purified P fraction (see Table 1). Each point is the mean ± S.E. of three independent determinations. This experiment was repeated twice. C, interaction of LSAL with the uptake of different neurotransmitters (or precursors). 20 nM of the different tritiated neurotransmitters (5-HT, dopamine, noradrenaline, choline, and -aminobutyric acid) were incubated in a Krebs-Ringer buffer with rat brain synaptosomes (100 µg of proteins) with or without increasing concentrations of synthetic LSAL (10M to 10M) for 10 min at 37 °C. Each point is the mean ± S.E. of three independent determinations. This experiment was repeated three times.



The inhibitory effect of LSAL on 5-HT receptors was also compared with those of the synthetic dipeptides (LS and AL). Indeed, LS and AL were, respectively, 100,000 and 10,000 times less efficient than the tetrapeptide (Fig. 9A). Finally, the synthetic peptides were also tested on 5-HT receptors using bovine brain cortical membranes. Thus, LSAL inhibited the binding of [^3H]5-HT to 5-HT receptors with an IC = 7.10M and a maximal effect reducing by 75-85% the specific binding. The synthetic dipeptides LS and AL were 500,000 and 100,000 times less efficient than the tetrapeptide, respectively (Fig. 9B).


Figure 9: Interaction of synthetic P (LSAL), P(1) (LS), and P(2) (AL) with 5-HT receptors. A, interaction with 5-HT receptors. [^3H]5-HT (5 nM) was incubated for 30 min at 25 °C with increasing concentrations of synthetic peptides (LSAL (bullet-bullet), LS (circle-circle), and AL (box-box)) in the presence of rat brain cortical membranes (100 µg of proteins) in a 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4, containing 4 mM CaCl(2), 0.1% ascorbic acid, 1 µM pargyline, 0.1 µM 8-OH-DPAT, and 0.1 µM mesulergine (V(t) = 200 µl). Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 0.1 µM 5-CT. Specific binding represented about 50% of the total binding and corresponded typically to 1000 cpm. Each point is the mean ± S.E. of three independent determinations. This experiment was repeated three times. B, interaction with 5-HT receptors. [^3H]5-HT (5 nM) was incubated for 30 min at 25 °C with increasing concentrations of synthetic peptides (LSAL (bullet-bullet), LS (circle-circle), and AL (box-box)) in the presence of bovine brain cortical membranes (100 µg of proteins) in a 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4, containing 4 mM CaCl(2), 0.1% ascorbic acid, 1 µM pargyline, 0.1 µM 8-OH-DPAT (V(t) = 200 µl). Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 0.1 µM 5-CT. Specific binding represented 50-60% of the total binding and corresponded typically to 1500 cpm. Each point is the mean ± S.E. of three independent determinations. This experiment was repeated twice.




DISCUSSION

The results reported herein describe the isolation and purification of a cerebral factor able to specifically interact with the 5-HT receptor.

The methodology developed to isolate this factor is a classical acid and organic procedure followed by HPLC chromatographic techniques. The initial step, including freezing and lyophylization of the brain tissue, was introduced to decrease the endogenous protease activity. The following step, which consisted of an ultracentrifugation (120,000 times g for 60 min at 25 °C) allowed us to separate and to discard endogenous lipids (upper phase). Under these experimental conditions, the resulting aqueous phase contained less than 1% of the original protein equivalent.

The initial size exclusion chromatography led to the separation of the F(1) fraction, which exhibited an inhibitory activity on the binding of [^3H]5-HT to 5-HT(1) sites. At that early step of purification, the pharmacological profile of the fraction already exhibited a clear selectivity for 5-HT(1) receptors, since the fraction did not affect the binding of specific radioligands to other neuroreceptors under study (not shown). It was also demonstrated that F(1) fraction did not correspond to endogenous 5-HT, as the amine had a different elution time (t(R) = 80 min for F(1); t(R) = 540 min for 5-HT).

The further C(18) reverse phase chromatography carried out to purify the F(1) fraction resulted in the separation of four peaks of activity. One of them (NR) was eluted in the void volume of the column and corresponded to a highly polar and dialyzable material (M(r) < 1,000). This fraction was analyzed using additional chromatographic systems, i.e. normal phase, hydrophobic column, and ion exchange chromatography. In all of these systems the fraction was retained on the column, suggesting that it mainly consisted of salts. Previously, similar observations were reported(34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39) , which did not lead to the identification of any particular compound.

The major activity retained on the column was the P fraction (t(R) = 21 min), which inhibited 83 ± 13% of the binding of [^3H]5-HT to 5-HT binding. The latter binding is the specific, high affinity binding of the tritiated amine in the presence of nonradioactive 8-OH-DPAT, which specifically masks the 5-HT receptors; 10 µM 5-CT is added to the medium to measure the nonspecific binding. Under these conditions, the observed binding essentially represents 5-HT receptor subtypes in rat. Two other fractions, P(1) and P(2), having shorter retention times (t(R) = 9 and 12 min, respectively), also exhibited inhibitory activities.

The P fraction was purified by gel permeation (Sephadex G) and successive reverse phase chromatographies using different matrices (C(18) Ultrabase and Hypercarb columns) and various optimal mobile phases determined after numerous trials. The pharmacological profile of the P fraction was established by examining its effect on the specific binding of various ligands as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' These assays were carried out in order to avoid the purification of a fraction that would nonspecifically inhibit the binding of [^3H]5-HT. Interestingly enough, at all purification steps, the P fraction exhibited a clear serotonergic specificity since, at the dose that maximally inhibited the 5-HT specific binding (1% of the total purified fraction), it did not significantly interact with the binding of [^3H]mepyramine, [^3H]prazosin, [^3H]dihydroalprenolol, [^3H]spiroperidol, [^3H]quinuclidinyl benzylate, [^3H]naloxone, and [^3H]flunitrazepam, which label histaminergic, alpha and beta adrenergic, dopaminergic, muscarinic, opiate, and benzodiazepine receptors, respectively. Moreover, it did not affect the binding of [^3H]ketanserin (antagonist) and [^3H]DOB (agonist) to 5-HT(2) receptors and that of [^3H]BRL 43694 to 5-HT(3) receptors. The effect of the P fraction also appeared restricted to 5-HT(1) receptors since the transport systems (uptake) of 5-HT itself and that of other neurotransmitters (or their precursors) were not affected (dopamine, noradrenaline, -aminobutyric acid, choline). These results indicate that the P fraction is clearly different from those previously reported, which efficiently inhibited the uptake of biogenic amines(34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39) . Furthermore, the purified P fraction specifically interacted with a specific 5-HT(1) receptor subtype, as neither 5-HT (labeled by [^3H]8-OH-DPAT) nor 5-HT or 5-HT (labeled by [^3H]5-HT in the presence of 5-CT) were significantly affected at a concentration that had a maximal inhibitory effect on 5-HT receptors.

The identification of the chemical structure of the P fraction, using amino acid analysis and peptide sequencing, resulted in its characterization as the peptide Leu-Ser-Ala-Leu. Complementary analysis using the NMR technique could not detect the presence of any other compound, indicating that the purification of the P fraction was conducted up to homogeneity.

The pharmacological specificity of the synthetic peptide was established using dose-response curves. It was then demonstrated that only the 5-HT receptor subtype was inhibited in the nanomolar range (IC = 0.1 nM). At much higher concentrations, LSAL also interacts with the 5-HT receptors (IC = 1 µM) and is still devoid of any significant activity on the other receptors examined. These results clearly demonstrate that LSAL specifically interacts with 5-HT receptor subtype.

As expected, the synthetic peptide exhibited a pharmacological profile very similar to that of the P fraction tested at a dose corresponding to 1% of the total purified fraction. Indeed, it was calculated that this dose corresponded to a peptide concentration of 8.10M, namely 1% of 0.3 µg of LSAL (molecular weight = 402.5) tested in a volume of 1 ml. Moreover, the synthetic peptide had exactly the same retention time as the purified P fraction on the C(18) Ultrabase reverse phase column (not shown). These results strongly suggest that the active compound contained in the P fraction corresponds to LSAL.

The activities of rat P(1) and P(2) fractions were too low to be traced accurately through the following different chromatographic steps. The extract prepared from bovine brains (600 g of initial weight) also contained three fractions having the same retention times as P, P(1), and P(2) fractions obtained from rat brain extract. The patterns of inhibitory activity on [^3H]5-HT binding were very similar when measured on bovine brain membranes as well as on rat brain membranes. Moreover, the activity of the bovine brain extract closely resembled that of the rat brain extract. These results tend to suggest that the three fractions observed in bovine brain extract are identical to those present in rat. Nevertheless, in bovine brain extract, the inhibitory activity was essentially localized in the P(1) and P(2) fractions, which were identified by amino acid and NMR analysis as AL and LS, respectively. Synthetic peptides, namely LS, AL, and LSAL, coeluted with P(1), P(2), and P fractions, respectively, whereas other peptides such as SL, LA, and LASL have different retention times in the same chromatographic system (not shown). These results further support the hypothesis that P fraction in bovine brain corresponds to LSAL and that P(1) and P(2) fractions in rat brain actually are LS and AL, respectively.

LS and AL were poorly active compared with LSAL (100,000 and 10,000 times less efficient, respectively). Accordingly, P(1) and P(2) fractions were poorly active compared with P fraction (using molecular weights of 211 and 213 for P(1) (LS) and P(2) (AL) fractions, respectively, the 1% dose tested corresponded to an amount close to 0.3 µg/ml of incubate and thus to a final concentration of 14 µM for the two dipeptides). The fact that AL and LS are dipeptides constitutive of LSAL suggests that these dipeptides may originate from the degradation of LSAL. In favor of this hypothesis, it was shown that the extraction procedure applied to the medium in the presence of labeled LSAL and in the absence of tissue does not induce the occurrence of the dipeptides. Moreover, the latter compounds were not found in the extract of a brain homogenate in which [^3H]LSAL was added prior to the the extraction process. On the contrary, the major part of [^3H]LSAL was found in the extract as the native radioactive compound. This result indicates that the cleavage of the tetrapeptide does not occur during the different steps of extraction and purification. Thus, the presence of the dipeptides observed in the brain extracts suggests that LSAL was degraded in LS and AL prior to the extraction procedure. The fact that P(1) and P(2) fractions are relatively more important than P fraction in bovine brain compared with rat brain extract supports the hypothesis that, during the long post-mortem delay (2-3 h) before processing the bovine brains, LSAL was cleaved in the two corresponding dipeptides. This phenomenon occurred to a lesser extent in rat brain, which could be processed more rapidly. These observations suggest that the cleavage of LSAL in LS and AL may correspond to the inactivation process of this endogenous peptide.

LSAL exhibited similar properties of binding inhibitions in rat brain and in bovine brain cortical membranes, indicating that it also interacted with 5-HT receptor subtype. It should be emphasized that 5-HT receptors are in non-rodent species the equivalent of the rodent 5-HT receptor, as has been shown from their functional properties and the close homology of the genes encoding for the corresponding receptor proteins(40) . This observation suggests an important functional role for this peptide since it has been conserved during the evolution. Moreover, its activity is maintained despite the fact that its functional target was modified under the pressure of the evolution leading to different pharmacological properties of 5-HT vis à vis 5-HT.

LSAL is an original sequence not represented in any of the known peptides or peptide precursors (Swissprot protein bank). Moreover, this peptide is not homogeneously distributed within the brain but rather is present in higher amounts in some brain areas (hippocampus, cortex) than in others (brain stem). These brain areas have been shown to contain 5-HT receptors(41) ; however, on the basis of the herein presented results, it is difficult to establish a direct relationship between the distribution of LSAL and that of the 5-HT receptors. Autoradiographic studies with the labeled peptide will determine this point. LSAL is also present in peripheral tissues, i.e. in kidneys, which also contain a high density of 5-HT receptors(42, 43) . The fact that LSAL is not found in significant amounts in liver suggests that it is not the result of the degradative procedure of a circulating protein. These observations support the hypothesis that LSAL may be an endogenous peptide.

Although it is too early to know the origin of this compound and its potential pathophysiological implications, these results demonstrate that LSAL is able to specifically interact with 5-HT receptors presumably via a particular binding site; preliminary results indicate that the inhibition corresponds to a noncompetitive interaction, which may suggest an allosteric mechanism. Additional studies are necessary to test this hypothesis and to examine the functional consequences of the existence of such a potential modulator. Nevertheless, the existence of this mechanism of interaction with the 5-HT receptor, which controls the serotonergic system activity, may lead to new directions of research in the mechanisms involved in numerous pathophysiological functions implicating the 5-HT system. Furthermore, the existence of a direct interaction of an endogenous peptide with a G protein-coupled receptor would result in new concepts in the mechanisms of regulation of the central nervous system.


FOOTNOTES

*
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Unité de Pharmacologie Neuro-Immuno-Endocrinienne, Institut Pasteur, 28 rue du Docteur Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex, France. Tel.: 33-1-45-68-86-75; Fax: 33-1-40-61-31-54.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: 5-HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine or serotonin; 5-CT, 5-carboxytryptamine; 8-OH-DPAT, 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin; DOB, (±)-1-(4-bromo-2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane; BRL 43694, endo-N-(9-methyl-9-azatricyclo[3,3,1]non-3-yl)-1-methyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxymide; t(R), retention time; LSAL, Leu-Ser-Ala-Leu; LS, Leu-Ser; AL, Ala-Leu; HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography; NR, not retained.


REFERENCES

  1. Siever, L. J., Kahn, R. S., Lawlor, B. A., Trestman, R. L., Lawrence, T. L. and Coccaro, E. F. (1991) Pharmacol. Rev. 43, 509-525 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Schildkraut, J. J. (1965) Am. J. Psychiatry. 122, 509-522 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Coppen, A. (1967) Br. J. Psychiatry 113, 1237-1264 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Briley, M., and Moret, C. (1993) Clin. Neuropharmacol. 16, 387-400 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Fillion, G., and Fillion, M.-P. (1981) Nature 292, 349-351 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Agnati, L. F., Fuxe, K., Benfenati, F., Zini, I., and Hökfelt, T. (1983) Acta Physiol. Scand. 117, 299-301 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Fuxe, K., Von Euler, G., Agnati, L. F., and Ögren, S.-O. (1988) Neurosci. Lett. 85, 163-167 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Engel, G., Göthert, M., Hoyer, D., Schlicker, E., and Hillenbrand, K. (1986) Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 332, 1-7
  9. Hoyer, D., and Middlemiss, D. N. (1989) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 10, 130-132 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Adhams, N., Romanienko, P., Hartig, P., Weinshank, R. L., and Branchek, T. (1992) Mol. Pharmacol. 41, 1-7 [Abstract]
  11. Harel-Dupas, C., Cloëz, I., and Fillion, G. (1991) J. Neurochem. 56, 221-227 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Bolaños, F., and Fillion, G. (1989) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 168, 87-92 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Bolaños-Jiménez, F., Manhães de Catro, R., and Fillion, G. (1993) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 242, 1-6 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Langer S. Z., and Moret, C. (1982) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 222, 220-226 [Abstract]
  15. Galzin, A.-M., Moret, C., Verzier, B., and Langer, S. Z. (1985) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 235, 200-211 [Abstract]
  16. Chaput, Y., De Montigny, C., and Blier, P. (1986) Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 333, 342-348
  17. Blier, P., Chaput, Y., and De Montigny, C. (1988) Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 337, 246-254
  18. Moret, C., and Briley, M. (1990) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 180, 351-356 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J. (1951) J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265-275 [Free Full Text]
  20. Palacios, J. M., Mengod, G., and Hoyer, D. (1993) Methods Neurosci. 12, 238-262
  21. Baraldi, M., Guidotti, A., Schwartz, J. P., and Costa, E. (1979) Science 205, 821-823 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Fields, J. Z., Reisine, T. D., and Yamamura, H. I. (1977) Brain Res. 136, 578-584 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Gozlan, H., El Mestikawy, S., Pichat, L., Glowinski, J., and Hamon, M. (1983) Nature 305, 140-142 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Hanft, G., and Gross, G. (1989) Br. J. Pharmacol. 97, 691-700 [Abstract]
  25. Hoyer, D., Engel, G., and Kalkman, H. O. (1985) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 118, 1-12 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Leysen, J. E., Niemegeers, C. J. E., Van Nueten, J. M., and Laduron, P. M. (1982) Mol. Pharmacol. 21, 301-314 [Abstract]
  27. Nelson, D. R., and Thomas, D. R. (1989) Biochem. Pharmacol. 38, 1693-1695 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Pert, C. B., and Snyder, S. H. (1973) Science 179, 1011-1014 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Stockmeier, C. A., and Kellar, K. J. (1989) Mol. Pharmacol. 36, 903-911 [Abstract]
  30. Titeler, M., Herrick, K., Lyon, R. A., Mc Kenney, J. D., and Glennon, R. A. (1985) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 117, 145-146 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Tran, V. T., Chang, R. S. L., and Snyder, S. H. (1978) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 75, 6290-6294 [Abstract]
  32. Yamamura, H. I., and Snyder, S. H. (1974) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 71, 1725-1729 [Abstract]
  33. Cotman, C. W., and Matthews, D. A. (1971) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 249, 380-394 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Barbaccia, M. L., Gandolfi, O., Chuang, D.-M., and Costa, E. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 80, 5134-5138 [Abstract]
  35. Barbaccia, M. L., and Costa, E. (1984) Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 430, 103-114 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Barbaccia, M. L., Costa, E., and Guidotti, A. (1988) Ann. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 28, 451-476 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Angel, I., and Paul, S. M. (1984) FEBS Lett. 171, 280-284 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Brusov, O. S., Fomenko, A. M., and Katasonov, A. B. (1985) Biol. Psychiatry 20, 235-244 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Rehavi, M., Ventura, I., and Sarne, Y. (1985) Life Sci. 36, 687-693 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Hartig, P. R., Branchek, T. A., and Weinshank, R. L. (1992) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 13, 152-159 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Hoyer, D., Clarke, D. E., Fozard, J. R., Hartig, P., Martin, G. R., Mylecharane, E. J., Saxena, P. R., and Humphrey, P. P. A. (1994) Pharmacol. Rev. 46, 157-203 [Abstract]
  42. Murphy, T. J., and Bylund, D. B. (1989) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 249, 535-542 [Abstract]
  43. Ciaranello, R. D., Tan, G. L., and Dean, R. (1990) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 252, 1347-1354 [Abstract]

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.