©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
A Role for ATP and TFIIH in Activation of the RNA Polymerase II Preinitiation Complex Prior to Transcription Initiation (*)

(Received for publication, January 16, 1996)

Arik Dvir (1) Karla Pfeil Garrett (1) Christian Chalut (2) Jean-Marc Egly (2) Joan Weliky Conaway (1) Ronald C. Conaway (1)(§)

From the  (1)Program in Molecular and Cell Biology, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104 and (2)INSERM-U, 184 CNRS, 1, rue Laurent Fries, B.P. 163, 67404 Illkirch, Cedex C. U. Strasbourg, France

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

A requirement for an ATP cofactor in synthesis of the first 8-10 bonds of promoter-specific transcripts by RNA polymerase II is well established. Whether ATP is required for synthesis of the first phosphodiester bond or at a slightly later stage in synthesis of nascent transcripts, however, remains controversial. Goodrich and Tjian (Goodrich, J. A., and Tjian, R.(1994) Cell 77, 145-156) recently proposed that synthesis of the first phosphodiester bond of promoter-specific transcripts by RNA polymerase II is independent of ATP and general transcription factors TFIIE and TFIIH. Here we investigate this model. Taken together, our findings indicate that ATP, TFIIE, and TFIIH can have a profound effect on the efficiency of transcription initiation. First, we observe that synthesis of the first phosphodiester bond of transcripts initiated at the adenovirus 2 major late promoter depends strongly on ATP, TFIIE, and TFIIH in a transcription system reconstituted with RNA polymerase II, TFIIH, and recombinant TBP, TFIIB, TFIIE, and TFIIF. Second, we demonstrate that, in this enzyme system, ATP-dependent activation of transcription initiation can occur immediately prior to synthesis of the first phosphodiester bond of nascent transcripts. Finally, we demonstrate that the activated initiation complex is unstable and decays rapidly to an inactive state in the presence of the inhibitor ATPS (adenosine 5`-O-(thio)triphosphate), even during reiterative synthesis of abortive transcripts.


INTRODUCTION

Promoter-specific transcription by RNA polymerase II on linear or relaxed DNA templates is a complex biochemical process requiring the general transcription factors TFIIB, TFIID, TFIIE, TFIIF, and TFIIH and a hydrolyzable ATP cofactor. A role for ATP as a cofactor in transcription by RNA polymerase II was first suggested in studies carried out with crude or partially fractionated transcription systems. Using HeLa cell extracts, Weinmann and co-workers (1) initially observed that AMP-PNP (^1)could not replace ATP in synthesis of AdML promoter-specific transcripts, even though AMP-PNP is a substrate for elongation by RNA polymerase II; these findings were subsequently corroborated and extended by Shatkin and co-workers(2) . In experiments carried out with partially fractionated HeLa cell extracts, Sawadogo and Roeder (3) obtained evidence that ATP is required at an early stage in transcription by demonstrating that ATP is essential for synthesis of the first 8 phosphodiester bonds of transcripts initiated at the AdML promoter. In an elegant series of experiments, Luse and Jacob (4) presented convincing evidence that, in HeLa cell extracts, ATP is essential for synthesis of the first phosphodiester bond of promoter-specific transcripts by demonstrating that hydrolyzable ATP is required for synthesis of dinucleotide-primed, abortive AdML-specific trinucleotide transcripts. These findings were recently confirmed and extended by Gralla and co-workers(5) , who demonstrated that ATP is required for synthesis of dinucleotide-primed, abortive trinucleotide transcripts initiated at the adenovirus E4 promoter in HeLa cell extracts.

Although the function of ATP has not been unequivocally established, several lines of evidence have led to the proposal that ATP is utilized by a DNA helicase activity associated with TFIIH to promote unwinding of the DNA template at the transcriptional start site prior to initiation. First, using KMnO(4) as a probe for DNA melting, Gralla and co-workers (5, 6, 7) demonstrated that, in HeLa cell extracts, ATP is needed for unwinding of a short stretch of DNA surrounding the transcriptional start site prior to initiation. Second, among the general transcription factors, only TFIIH has detectable ATP-hydrolyzing activities. TFIIH has been shown to possess closely associated DNA-dependent ATPase/dATPase(8, 9) , DNA helicase(10, 11) , and protein kinase (9, 12, 13) activities. The TFIIH protein kinase activity has been shown to be dispensable for transcription under conditions where ATP is needed(14, 15, 16) , arguing that it does not mediate the essential ATP-requiring step in transcription by RNA polymerase II. Finally, recent biochemical studies indicate that the ATP cofactor is not required for transcription under a limited set of conditions where TFIIH is dispensable for initiation; these conditions include transcription from promoters on negatively supercoiled DNA templates (17, 18, 19) or promoters containing a short stretch of mismatched base pairs surrounding the transcriptional start site(20, 21) .

Recently, a requirement for ATP in transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II has been called into question. In experiments carried out with a transcription system reconstituted with RNA polymerase II and TFIIH purified from HeLa cells and recombinant TBP, TFIIB, TFIIE, and TFIIF, Goodrich and Tjian (22) observed synthesis of dinucleotide-primed, abortive AdML-specific trinucleotide transcripts in the absence of added ATP, TFIIE, and TFIIH. In light of this finding, they proposed that ATP and TFIIH are not essential for synthesis of the first phosphodiester bond of nascent transcripts but, instead, are required at a later transcriptional stage referred to as promoter clearance. To explain the discrepancy between their findings and those of earlier studies, they suggested that the previously observed requirement for ATP in transcription initiation might be an artifact resulting from impurities present in crude transcription systems.

In this report, we have investigated the role of ATP and TFIIH in transcription initiation using an enzyme system reconstituted with RNA polymerase II, TFIIH, and recombinant TBP, TFIIB, TFIIE, and TFIIF. As we describe below, our findings argue strongly that ATP and TFIIH can have a profound effect on the efficiency of transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II, and they shed new light on the role of ATP in this process.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

Unlabeled ultrapure ribonucleoside 5`-triphosphates and dATP were purchased from Pharmacia Biotech Inc. Dinucleotides CpA, CpU, ApC, ApG, GpA, UpU, and UpG, alpha-amanitin, and polyvinyl alcohol (type II) were obtained from Sigma. ATPS was from Boehringer Mannheim. [alpha-P]CTP (>400 Ci/mmol) was purchased from Amersham Corp. Bovine serum albumin (Pentex fraction V) was obtained from ICN Immunobiologicals. Human placental ribonuclease inhibitor (RNasin) was from Promega.

Preparation of RNA Polymerase II and Transcription Factors

RNA polymerase II (12) and TFIIH (23) were purified as described from rat liver nuclear extracts. Recombinant yeast TBP (24, 25) and recombinant rat TFIIB (26) were expressed in Escherichia coli and purified as described. Recombinant TFIIE was prepared as described, except that the 56-kDa subunit was expressed in BL21(DE3)pLysS(27) . Recombinant TFIIF was expressed in JM109(DE3) using the M13 mpET expression system and purified as described previously(28) .

Assay of Transcription Initiation

Preinitiation complexes were assembled at the AdML promoter at 28 °C by either a 20-min (Fig. 1B, 2B, and 4) or a 45-min (Fig. 1C, 2A, and 3) preincubation of 60-µl reaction mixtures containing 20 mM Hepes-NaOH (pH 7.9), 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.9), 60 mM KCl, 7 mM MgCl(2), 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 2% (w/v) polyvinyl alcohol, 7% (v/v) glycerol, 6 units of RNasin, 100 ng of the EcoRI-NdeI fragment from pDN-AdML(29) , 10 ng of recombinant TFIIB, 20 ng of recombinant TFIIF, 20 ng of recombinant TFIIE and TFIIH (150 ng of rat TSK DEAE 5-PW fraction in Fig. 1B, 1C, 2A, 3, and 4B or 40 ng of rat TSK SP 5-PW fraction in Fig. 2B and Fig. 4A), 50 ng of yeast TBP (AcA 44 fraction), and 0.01 unit of RNA polymerase II. As indicated in the figure legends, transcription was initiated by addition of dinucleotide primer, ribonucleoside triphosphates, and alpha-P-labeled ribonucleoside triphosphates. Transcription was carried out at 28 °C for the times indicated in the figure legends. Transcription was stopped by addition of 8 µl of reaction mix to 2 µl of a stop solution containing 100 mM EDTA and 0.5 mg/ml proteinase K. Following an incubation of at least 15 min at room temperature, 10 µl of 9 M urea containing 0.025% bromphenol blue and 0.025% xylene cyanol FF was added, and trinucleotide transcripts were analyzed by electrophoresis through 25% (w/v) acrylamide, 3% (w/v) bisacrylamide, 7 M urea gels as described(30) . Trinucleotide synthesis was quantitated by PhosphorImager analysis and is expressed in arbitrary units that represent the phosphorescence intensity measured in a given exposure time.


Figure 1: Requirements for synthesis of trinucleotide transcripts from the AdML promoter. A, AdML promoter sequence in the vicinity of the transcriptional start site. The arrow indicates the position of the in vivo start site. B, specificity of dinucleotide-primed abortive transcription. Transcription reactions were performed as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Reaction mixtures contained 5 µM dATP, 500 µM of the indicated dinucleotide primer, and 10 µCi of [alpha-P]CTP and were incubated at 28 °C for 30 min. C, transcription factors required for synthesis of trinucleotide transcripts. Transcription reactions were performed as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Reaction mixtures, which contained 5 µM dATP, 250 µM CpA primer, 10 µCi of [alpha-P]CTP, and the indicated combinations of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) and general transcription factors, were incubated at 28 °C for 30 min. The reaction shown in lane 1 contained 1 µg/ml alpha-amanitin (alpha-am).




Figure 2: Trinucleotide synthesis depends on ATP, TFIIE, and TFIIH. A, transcription reactions were performed as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Reaction mixtures contained 5 µM dATP, 250 µM CpA primer, 10 µCi of [alpha-P]CTP, and transcription factors as indicated and were incubated at 28 °C for 30 min. B, reactions were carried for 60 min as described under ``Experimental Procedures'' in the presence of 0.05-5 µM ATP, 250 µM CpA primer, and 10 µCi of [alpha-P]CTP.




Figure 4: ATPS inhibits trinucleotide synthesis when added following initiation of abortive transcription. Transcription reactions were performed as described under ``Experimental Procedures'' in the presence of 250 µM CpA and 10 µCi of [alpha-P]CTP and for the times indicated in the figure. A, reactions contained 5 µM dATP and and 100 µM ATPS as indicated in the figure. B, transcription reactions were performed in the presence (bullet, , box) or absence (circle) of 5 µM dATP. , box, 100 µM ATPS was added at 20 min. , an additional 150 µM dATP was added at 50 min.




RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In this report, we have used the abortive initiation assay to investigate the requirements for synthesis of the first phosphodiester bond of AdML promoter-specific transcripts in a transcription system reconstituted with recombinant TBP, TFIIB, TFIIE, TFIIF, and RNA polymerase II and TFIIH purified from rat liver. As shown previously (4, 5, 22, 29, 31) RNA polymerase II will utilize dinucleotides to prime synthesis of promoter-specific transcripts; depending on the dinucleotide primer provided, initiation can occur over an approximately nine-base region centered around the normal transcription start site(31) . If only a dinucleotide primer and the next nucleotide encoded by the template are provided as substrates for RNA synthesis, polymerase will efficiently synthesize abortively initiated, trinucleotide transcripts(4, 5, 22, 30, 32) . The dinucleotide-primed abortive initiation assay has been widely used in studies analyzing synthesis of the first phosphodiester bond of nascent transcripts by prokaryotic (33, 34) and eukaryotic (4, 5, 22, 30, 32) RNA polymerases.

To assess the specificity of trinucleotide synthesis in our reconstituted transcription system, abortive initiation reactions with RNA polymerase II, all five general transcription factors, and dATP were carried out in the presence of [alpha-P]CTP and various dinucleotide primers. As expected from the sequence of the AdML non-template strand in the region of the transcription start site (Fig. 1A), we observe efficient trinucleotide synthesis when CpA or CpU but not ApC, ApG, UpU, and UpG are used as the dinucleotide primers (Fig. 1B). In addition, trinucleotide synthesis is strongly inhibited by 1 µg/ml alpha-amanitin, which inhibits RNA polymerase II but not bacterial RNA polymerases or mammalian RNA polymerases I or III; thus the observed trinucleotide synthesis does not result from a contaminating polymerase activity (Fig. 1C, compare lanes 1 and 2).

To determine the requirements for synthesis of the first phosphodiester bond of AdML promoter-specific transcripts in our reconstituted transcription system, the abortive initiation reaction was carried out in the presence of various combinations of RNA polymerase II and general transcription factors, in the presence or absence of dATP. As expected, trinucleotide synthesis was strongly dependent on the presence of RNA polymerase II, TBP, TFIIB, and TFIIF (Fig. 1C). Surprisingly, however, efficient trinucleotide synthesis was observed only in the presence of added dATP (Fig. 2A, lane 1) or ATP (Fig. 2B). The apparent K(m) for ATP as a cofactor in the abortive initiation assay is extremely low (250 nM, Fig. 2B). The apparent K(m) for dATP was somewhat higher (500 nM) (data not shown).

Consistent with the model that the ATP/dATP-dependent step in transcription is mediated by TFIIH, trinucleotide synthesis was strongly dependent on addition of TFIIH. The reaction was also strongly dependent on addition of TFIIE, which has been shown to mediate the interaction of TFIIH with the preinitiation complex (Fig. 2A, lanes 3 and 4)(23, 35) . Thus, ATP, TFIIE, and TFIIH can have a profound effect on the efficiency of synthesis of the first phosphodiester bond of nascent transcripts when transcription initiation is carried out in a highly purified, reconstituted transcription system.

To investigate in greater detail the function of ATP in synthesis of abortively initiated transcripts, we exploited the nucleotide analog ATPS. In a previous study, we observed that ATPS is a potent inhibitor of ATP/dATP-dependent transcription by RNA polymerase II in a partially fractionated transcription system from rat liver, and we obtained evidence that ATPS inhibits a reversible, ATP/dATP-requiring step that occurs prior to synthesis of 4-9 nucleotide, Sarkosyl-resistant transcripts in this system(29) . Here we demonstrate that ATPS is also a potent inhibitor of dATP-dependent trinucleotide synthesis in the purified, reconstituted transcription system. When added to reaction mixtures either with dATP, CpA, and [alpha-P]CTP (see Fig. 4A) or with dATP and prior to addition of CpA and [alpha-P]CTP, trinucleotide synthesis is very strongly inhibited (Fig. 3, first two lanes of inset). The ATP-dependent step can occur prior to initiation and is reversible, since preincubation of template, RNA polymerase II, and the general transcription factors with dATP for 1 min prior to addition of CpA and [alpha-P]CTP renders trinucleotide synthesis resistant to inhibition by ATPS; in the absence of initiating nucleotides, the activated preinitiation complex decays with a half-life of 30-60 s.


Figure 3: dATP-dependent activation of the preinitiation complex prior to trinucleotide synthesis. Preinitiation complexes were assembled as described under ``Experimental Procedures'' with 250 µM CpA and 10 µCi of [alpha-P]CTP. All subsequent steps were carried out at room temperature according to the procedure diagrammed at the bottom of the figure. 5 µM dATP and 100 µM ATPS were added to reaction mixtures at the times indicated in the figure.



To determine whether ATPS inhibits transcription once trinucleotide synthesis has been initiated, we carried out the experiment shown in Fig. 4. In this experiment ATPS was added to reaction mixtures 10 min after addition of CpA and [alpha-P]CTP; this resulted in the immediate cessation of trinucleotide synthesis (Fig. 4B), indicating that the activated initiation complex is unstable and decays rapidly to an inactive state in the presence of the inhibitor ATPS, even during reiterative synthesis of abortive transcripts. Inhibition of trinucleotide synthesis was completely reversible; following addition of excess dATP to an ATPS-inhibited reaction, trinucleotide synthesis resumed immediately, and the rate of trinucleotide synthesis following dATP addition was the same as in a control reaction containing no ATPS.

In summary, in this report we have investigated the role of ATP and general transcription factors TFIIE and TFIIH in the synthesis of the first few phosphodiester bonds of promoter-specific transcripts by RNA polymerase II in a transcription system reconstituted with purified TFIIH and recombinant TBP, TFIIB, TFIIE, and TFIIF. Our findings indicate that ATP, TFIIE, and TFIIH can have a dramatic effect on the efficiency of transcription initiation. In addition, we observe that ATP-dependent activation of transcription initiation can occur immediately prior to synthesis of the first phosphodiester bond of nascent transcripts and, further, that the activated initiation complex is unstable and decays rapidly to an inactive state in the presence of the inhibitor ATPS, even during reiterative synthesis of abortive transcripts. Our finding that the activated initiation complex is unstable during abortive transcription, which involves multiple rounds of initiation by the same RNA polymerase II molecules(4, 5) , suggests that, unlike elongating polymerase, RNA polymerase II in the initiation complex is either unable to maintain the DNA template in an ``open'' configuration or incompetent to catalyze synthesis of phosphodiester bonds in the absence of continuing ATP hydrolysis. At the present time, we do not know whether a separate ATP activation event is required for each round of initiation or whether a single ATP activation event is sufficient to promote multiple rounds of initiation, perhaps until the activated initiation complex decays to an inactive state. Finally, our findings do not exclude the possibility that additional ATP-requiring steps may be required after synthesis of the first phosphodiester bond of nascent transcripts but prior or concomitant to entry of RNA polymerase II into the elongation stage of transcription. Future experiments addressing these issues will be essential for a complete understanding of the role of ATP in transcription by RNA polymerase II.

Note Added in Proof-While this manuscript was under review, we learned that Holstege et al. (Holstege, F. C. P., van der Vliet, P. C., and Timmers, H. T. M.(1996) EMBO J.15, in press) had obtained similar findings.


FOOTNOTES hspace=3 SRC="/icons/back.GIF">

*
This work was supported by Grant GM41628 from the National Institutes of Health and by funds provided to the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation by the H. A. and Mary K. Chapman Charitable Trust. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Program in Molecular and Cell Biology, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, 825 N. E. 13th St., Oklahoma City, OK 73104. Tel.: 405-271-1950; Fax: 405-271-1580.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: AMP-PNP, adenyl-5`-yl imidodiphosphate; AdML, adenovirus 2 major late; ATPS, adenosine 5`-O-(thio)triphosphate.


REFERENCES

  1. Bunick, D., Zandomeni, R., Ackerman, S., and Weinmann, R. (1982) Cell 29, 877-886 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Ernst, H., Filipowicz, W., and Shatkin, A. J. (1983) Mol. Cell. Biol. 3, 2172-2179 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Sawadogo, M., and Roeder, R. G. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 5321-5326 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Luse, D. S., and Jacob, G. A. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 14990-14997 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Jiang, Y., Yan, M., and Gralla, J. D. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 27332-27338 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Wang, W., Carey, M., and Gralla, J. D. (1992) Science 255, 450-453 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Jiang, Y., Smale, S. T., and Gralla, J. D. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 6535-6540 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Conaway, R. C., and Conaway, J. W. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 7356-7360 [Abstract]
  9. Feaver, W. J., Gileadi, O., Li, Y., and Kornberg, R. D. (1991) Cell 67, 1223-1230 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Schaeffer, L., Roy, R., Humbert, S., Moncollin, V., Vermeulen, W., Hoeijmakers, J. H. J., Chambon, P., and Egly, J. M. (1993) Science 260, 58-63 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Serizawa, H., Conaway, R. C., and Conaway, J. W. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 17300-17308 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Serizawa, H., Conaway, R. C., and Conaway, J. W. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 7476-7480 [Abstract]
  13. Lu, H., Zawel, L., Fischer, L., Egly, J. M., and Reinberg, D. (1992) Nature 358, 641-645 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Serizawa, H., Conaway, J. W., and Conaway, R. C. (1993) Nature 363, 371-374 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Li, Y., and Kornberg, R. D. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 2362-2366 [Abstract]
  16. Makela, T. P., Parvin, J. D., Kim, J., Huber, L. J., Sharp, P. A., and Weinberg, R. A. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 5174-5178 [Abstract]
  17. Parvin, J. D., and Sharp, P. A. (1993) Cell 73, 533-540 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Timmers, H. T. M. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 391-399 [Abstract]
  19. Parvin, J. D., Shykind, B. M., Meyers, R. E., Kim, J., and Sharp, P. A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 18414-18421 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Tantin, D., and Carey, M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 17397-17400 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Holstege, F., Tantin, D., Carey, M., van der Vliet, P. C., and Timmers, H. T. M. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 810-819 [Abstract]
  22. Goodrich, J. A., and Tjian, R. (1994) Cell 77, 145-156 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Conaway, J. W., Bradsher, J. N., and Conaway, R. C. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 10142-10148 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Schmidt, M. C., Kao, C. C., Pei, R., and Berk, A. J. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 7785-7789 [Abstract]
  25. Conaway, J. W., Hanley, J. P., Garrett, K. P., and Conaway, R. C. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 7804-7811 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Tsuboi, A., Conger, K., Garrett, K. P., Conaway, R. C., Conaway, J. W., and Arai, N. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 3250 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Peterson, M. G., Inostroza, J., Maxon, M. E., Flores, O., Admon, A., Reinberg, D., and Tjian, R. (1991) Nature 354, 369-373 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Tan, S., Conaway, R. C., and Conaway, J. W. (1994) BioTechniques 16, 824-828 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Conaway, R. C., and Conaway, J. W. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 2962-2968 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Jacob, G. A., Luse, S. W., and Luse, D. S. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 22537-22544 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Samuels, M., Fire, A., and Sharp, P. A. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 2517-2525 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Jacob, G. A., Kitzmiller, J. A., and Luse, D. S. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 3655-3663 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. McClure, W. R., Cech, C. L., and Johnston, D. E. (1978) J. Biol. Chem. 253, 8941-8948 [Abstract]
  34. Carpousis, A. J., and Gralla, J. D. (1980) Biochemistry 19, 3245-3253 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Flores, O., Lu, H., and Reinberg, D. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 2786-2793 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.