©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Expression of Rat Cathepsin S in Phagocytic Cells (*)

(Received for publication, September 11, 1995; and in revised form, November 10, 1995)

Suzana Petanceska (§) Peter Canoll Lakshmi A. Devi (¶)

From the Department of Pharmacology, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York 10016

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

Cysteine lysosomal proteases are essential for turnover of intracellular and extracellular proteins. These enzymes are strongly implicated in normal and pathological processes involving tissue remodeling. Among the cysteine proteases, cathepsin S seems to be best suited for such a process since it retains most of its enzymatic activity at neutral pH. In situ hybridization analyses of the adult rat brain, spleen, and lung reveal that cathepsin S mRNA is preferentially expressed in cells of mononuclear-phagocytic origin. After entorhinal cortex lesion of adult rat brain (a paradigm for neuronal degeneration and reactive synaptogenesis), cathepsin S mRNA is dramatically increased in activated microglia in the deafferented dentate gyrus and in macrophages at the wound site, suggesting a role in lesion-induced tissue remodeling. This possibility is further supported by the finding that cathepsin S degrades a number of extracellular matrix molecules at neutral pH and by the finding that inflammatory mediators stimulate its secretion from the microglia and macrophages. These data suggest that cathepsin S is an important player in degenerative disorders associated with the cells of the mononuclear phagocytic system.


INTRODUCTION

Cysteine lysosomal proteases are essential for the turnover of intracellular proteins, as well as extracellular proteins internalized by endocytosis(1) , and therefore they are implicated in a number of pathological conditions that involve tissue destruction such as tumor metastasis, arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and Alzheimer's disease (2, 3, 4, 5) . Members of this family of proteases (cathepsins B, L, N, S) have been shown to be able to degrade components of basement membranes and extracellular matrix (ECM)(^1)(6, 7) . Among them, cathepsin L is known to have the highest collagenolytic and elastinolytic activity(7) . Cathepsin S also exhibits collagenolytic activity and is a potent elastinolytic enzyme(8, 9) . These data, and the fact that in different tumors cathepsin B and cathepsin L are secreted as proenzymes, have lead to the hypothesis that the secreted proenzymes are activated in the extracellular environment that has been locally acidified by infiltrating macrophages and take part in the focal dissolution of the ECM, that way contributing to tumor metastasis (2) . In that respect, it is important to note that cathepsin S is the only member of the family that can retain proteolytic activity after prolonged exposure to neutral pH(10, 11) . This is in contrast to other lysosomal hydrolases (such as cathepsin L and cathepsin B) that are irreversibly inactivated at neutral pH(11) ; this raises the appealing possibility that cathepsin S could function equally well extracellularly and intracellularly.

The analyses of the expression pattern of different cysteine lysosomal proteases suggest that some members of the family subserve a housekeeping role, while others perform a more specialized and/or tissue-specific function. For example, the mRNAs for cathepsins B and L are fairly evenly distributed throughout the body(12) . However, the transcripts for cathepsin S show variation in levels among tissues and exhibit a restricted expression pattern(12, 13, 14, 15, 16) .

Our previous work showed that in rat brain the expression pattern of cathepsin S mRNA is profoundly different from the expression pattern of the transcripts for cathepsin B and cathepsin L(14) . Namely, cathepsin S mRNA was found in cells that are fairly homogeneously distributed in gray and white matter; it could also be seen in some perivascular cells, as well as in a number of cells in the choroid plexus and the leptomeninges(14) . The distribution as well as the morphology of these cells suggested that cathepsin S mRNA was expressed in different populations of brain macrophages: microglia in the parenchyma and perivascular and leptomeningeal macrophages.

By in situ hybridization analyses of rat spleen and lungs, combined with immunostaining of the same tissues with OX42 (an antibody that recognizes the C3bi receptor, common to various subpopulations of macrophages), and Northern analyses of a number of cell lines and different primary glial cultures, we show that in rat brain and in peripheral tissues cathepsin S mRNA is preferentially expressed in cells from the mononuclear phagocytic system. This is consistent with previous reports showing that the highest cathepsin S activity is in the bovine spleen (10) and that within the human lung immunoreactive cathepsin S is in the macrophages(9) .

Cathepsin S is expressed largely in cells of mononuclear phagocytic lineage; this raises the possibility that cathepsin S may be involved in macrophage-mediated tissue destruction. To address this possibility, we examined the expression and distribution of cathepsin S after entorhinal cortex lesion (ECL) of adult rat brain and compared it to the expression and distribution of cathepsins B and L by in situ hybridization histochemistry. Entorhinal cortex lesion is not only a classical paradigm for studying neuronal degeneration and reactive synaptogenesis, but it is also a lesion with a well characterized microglial response(17) , which enabled us to further confirm the cell-specific expression of cathepsin S mRNA. In response to unilateral ECL, cathepsin S mRNA expression was dramatically increased around the wound site and in the outer molecular layer of the deafferented dentate gyrus, areas of infiltration of blood borne macrophages and microglial hyper proliferation, respectively.

We also show that classical inflammatory mediators (bacterial endotoxin and IFN) stimulate the secretion of cathepsin S activity from resident and thioglycolate-elicited peritoneal macrophages and from a microglial cell line. Finally, we show that cathepsin S efficiently degrades various ECM molecules (laminin, fibronectin, and brain chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans) at neutral pH in vitro.

Taken together, our results strongly support an important role for cathepsin S in the macrophage/microglia-mediated tissue destruction and remodeling in the brain and in peripheral tissues.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tissue Preparation and in Situ Hybridization

Spleen or lung were quickly removed from 10-week-old male rats (Sprague-Dawley) and frozen in isopentane at -30 °C. 15-micron-thick cryostat sections were mounted on L-polylysine-coated slides and processed for in situ hybridization as described previously(14) . The sections were then hybridized with [S]UTP labeled antisense riboprobes, diluted in hybridization buffer (75% formamide, 10% dextran sulfate, 3 times SSC, 50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, 1 times Denhardt's, 10 mM DTT, 10 mg/ml yeast tRNA) to give a final concentration of 1 times 10^6 cpm/section. Portions of rat cathepsins B, L, and S cDNAs (570, 495, and 502 base pairs, respectively), which span the distance between the conserved domains that contain the active site Cys and Asn residues, were chosen to generate cRNA probes as reported previously(14) . Adjacent sections were hybridized with riboprobes for cathepsins B, L, or S, with similar specific activities. After overnight hybridization at 55 °C, the excess of unbound riboprobe was removed by treatment with RNase A (200 µg/ml in 100 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0, and 0.5 M NaCl) for 1 h at 22 °C. The sections were then rinsed in 2 times SSC, 1 times SSC, and 0.5 times SSC (10 min each at 22 °C) and washed in 0.1 times SSC at 65 °C for 1 h. After being dehydrated through graded alcohols and air dried, the sections were exposed to XAR-5 (Eastman Kodak) x-ray film. To enable analysis of the signal at the cellular level, the slides were dipped in L4 or K5 photographic emulsion (Polysciences, Warrington, PA) and stored at 4 °C for 1-3 weeks before developing. The developed, emulsion-dipped sections were counterstained with 0.05% Cresyl violet (pH 4.0) and analyzed on a bright field/dark field Leitz microscope.

Two types of controls were used to ensure specificity of the hybridization signal: a sense strand control and an RNase pretreatment control. No signal higher than background was seen on any of the sections when the sense probes were used or when the tissue was treated with RNase A before hybridization to the antisense probes.

Stereotactic lesioning of the entorhinal cortex of 10-week-old adult male rats (Sprague-Dawley) was performed as described(18) . Lesioned brains were quickly removed, frozen in isopentane, sectioned, and processed for in situ hybridization as described above.

Immunocytochemistry

The immunostaining was performed using the ABC Elite kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) following a protocol suggested by the manufacturer. 10-30-micron slide-mounted sections were incubated with OX42 (Harlan, Bioproducts for Science), an anti-C3bi receptor monoclonal antibody, in Tris-buffered saline, 0.1% BSA at 1:1000 dilution. The signal was detected by incubating the sections with 3`3`-diaminobenzidine, a chromogenic substrate for horseradish peroxidase (0.2 mg/ml in Tris-saline, pH 7.4) and H(2)0(2) (0.03%, final concentration), until sufficient staining was achieved. The tissue was then dehydrated through graded alcohols, defatted in xylene, and coverslipped using Permount.

For diagnostic immunofluorescence, primary mixed glial cells or cells from purified type 1 astrocytes, microglia, or O2A progenitors were plated onto coverslips. Before the assay, the medium was removed, and the cells were washed three times with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min. The paraformaldehyde was washed away extensively with PBS and blocked with PBS, 0.1% BSA for 30 min. To stain for GFAP, the cells were permeabilized for 10 min in PBS, 0.1% Triton X-100 before the blocking step. The cells were incubated for 1 h with primary antibodies diluted in PBS, 0.1% BSA as follows: 1:100 dilution of K5 (an anti-GFAP antibody for type 1 astrocytes), 1:500 dilution of OX42 (an anti-C3bi receptor antibody for microglia), and 1:100 dilution of A2B5 (an anti-GQ1 ganglioside for O2A progenitors). The sections were washed three times with PBS and incubated with fluorescine or rhodamine-conjugated secondary antibodies for an additional hour. After washing with PBS, the cells were washed with water and coverslipped using Aquamount.

Culturing of Primary Glial Cells and Cell Lines

Mixed rat glial cultures were obtained from neonatal cortices (P0-P4), essentially as described by McCarthy and deVellis(19) . Microglial and O2A progenitor cultures were obtained from 7-10-day-old confluent mixed glial cultures. The mixed cultures were shaken on an orbital shaker at 200-300 rpm for 12 h at 37 °C. The detached O2A progenitors and microglia were removed from the flask with the medium and replated onto new tissue culture dishes. The non-detached cells were essentially type 1 astrocytes. The replated microglia/O2A progenitors were left to adhere for 3 h. This allowed the microglia to become firmly adherent, whereas the O2A progenitors were only loosely attached. The O2A progenitors were then detached from the culture dish by gentle flushing and replated onto polylysine-coated dishes and allowed to adhere overnight. Any remaining microglia in the O2A cultures were selectively killed by treating the cultures with 5 mM leucine methylester for 15 min at room temperature and then washing the cultures with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium. The purity of the cultures was established by diagnostic immunofluorescence.

The microglial cell line, N-13(20) , primary macrophages, and thioglycolate-elicited macrophage cells were maintained on Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal calf serum. For secretion studies, the cells were plated in 24-well plates at a density of approximately 10^5 cells/well in macrophage serum-free medium (Life Technologies, Inc.). All treatments were performed in macrophage serum-free medium. The cells were washed three times in macrophage serum-free medium and treated with 300 µg/ml of lipopolysaccharide (LPS, J5 strain) alone, 30 units/ml of IFN alone, or with both LPS (300 µg/ml) and IFN (30 units/ml) in 300 µl of medium. Following a 5-h incubation, the cells were washed and replaced with fresh medium containing the appropriate treatments. The secreted medium was collected for 1 h, centrifuged, and stored frozen at -20 °C.

Cathepsin S Activity Determination

The spent medium was subjected to a neutral pH incubation step prior to cathepsin S activity determination; this step inactivates the other lysosomal proteases with substrate specificity similar to that of cathepsin S while retaining activity of cathepsin S. For this, an aliquot of spent medium was incubated with 10 volumes of 150 mM Tris-Cl buffer, pH 7.5, containing 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT, 0.01% Triton X-100 for 45 min at 37 °C. The protease activity in this medium was measured as described previously(15) . Briefly, the enzyme was incubated in 100 mM sodium acetate buffer, pH 5.0, containing 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 mM pepstatin A, and 20 µM aminobenzoyl-Phe-Arg-aminomethyl coumarin as the substrate. The product formed was detected at excitation 383 nm and emission 460 nm. Parallel incubation with 5 µM trans-epoxysuccinyl-L-leucilamido-(4-guanidino)butane (also known as E-64, Sigma) were carried out as controls. E-64 is a highly selective active site-directed inhibitor that inhibits majority of the lysosomal cysteine hydrolases with high potency(10) . To ensure the specificity of the assay, we took advantage of the neutral pH inactivation of the other lysosomal hydrolases; we also included inhibitors of serine, aspartyl, and metalloproteases in the assay buffer.

Proteolysis of ECM Molecules by Cathepsin S

For measuring the degradation of ECM molecules, purified cathepsin S was used. Recombinant human cathepsin S expressed in yeast was purified using 80% ammonium sulfate precipitation followed by affinity chromatography of the resuspended precipitate on thiopropyl-agarose(11) . Approximately 300 or 30 ng of purified cathepsin S was incubated with 10 µg of bovine fibronectin, laminin, collagen I and IV, or basement membrane heparan sulfate proteoglycan in 100 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6, containing 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT, and 0.01% Triton X-100 or in 100 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.5, containing 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT, and 0.01% Triton X-100. The digestions were performed for 15 or 150 min at 37 °C. Mock digestions without the enzyme and digestions in the presence of E-64 (5 µM) were performed as negative controls. The reaction products were resolved on 4-20% gradient SDS-polyacrylamide gels and visualized by silver staining(21) .

Chondroitinase-treated native or radioiodinated neurocan and phosphacan (purified from rat brain) were subjected to proteolysis by purified cathepsin S at acidic and neutral pH in buffers as described above. Approximately 5 times 10^5 cpm of radioiodinated proteoglycans (equivalent to 5-10 ng of proteoglycans) were used for each digestion. The proteoglycan preparations contained a 1000-fold excess of BSA (24 µg of BSA in the case of neurocan and 10 µg of BSA in the case of phosphacan) as a radiation scavenger. Each reaction mixture contained 300 or 30 ng of active cathepsin S. The reaction products were resolved on 4-20% SDS-polyacrylamide gels. The gels were dried and exposed to XAR-5 (Eastman Kodak Co.) x-ray film. Digestions of native proteoglycans were carried out essentially as described above except that after being digested with cathepsin S the reaction mixtures were treated with chodroitinase(22) ; this enables entry of the proteoglycans into the gel. The products were resolved on 4-20% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and detected by autoradiography.


RESULTS

Our previous in situ hybridization study in adult rat brain showed that cathepsin S mRNA is expressed in cells that have the morphology typical for different populations of brain macrophages/microglia(14) . The results of in situ hybridization analyses of cathepsin S mRNA expression in rat spleen and lung tissue support the notion that this enzyme is preferentially expressed in cells from the mononuclear-phagocytic system throughout the body. In rat spleen, cathepsin S mRNA could be seen in cells from the marginal zone, an area that contains both macrophages and dendritic cells (Fig. 1A); in lungs cathepsin S mRNA is expressed in a small number of large cells in the alveolar wall, most likely representing alveolar macrophages (Fig. 1C). This is supported by the finding that a similar pattern was obtained by immunostaining of the serial sections of rat spleen and lung with OX42 (panels B and D, respectively). OX42 is a monoclonal antibody that recognizes resident tissue macrophages, alveolar macrophages, dendritic cells, Kupffer cells, and microglia.


Figure 1: Cathepsin S mRNA expression in rat spleen and lung. Panels A and C represent dark field photomicrographs of emulsion-dipped sections, and panels B and D represent OX42-immunostained sections of spleen and lung, respectively. In spleen (panel A), cathepsin S expression is seen in cells from the marginal zone, surrounding the white pulp (WP); similar pattern is seen by immunostaining of a serial section with OX42 (panel B). Arrows in panels A and B point to a group of cathepsin S and OX42 positive cells in the marginal zone, respectively. Panel C shows cathepsin S expression in rat lung section through a bronchiole (B). Large cells expressing high levels of mRNA are located in the alveolar walls; similar pattern is seen by immunostaining of a serial section with OX42 (panel D). Arrows in panels C and D point to cathepsin S positive cells and OX42 positive cells, respectively. Magnification 300times.



The expression of cathepsin S mRNA in cells of the mononuclear-phagocytic system is consistent with the results from Northern blot analysis of a number of mouse and rat cell lines from different embryonic origin. Cathepsin S mRNA was detected only in the Wehi 3B monocytic leukemia cell line and the N-13, microglia-like cell line (Table 1). We did not detect this transcript either in various cell lines of neuronal (PC12,N2A, N1e-115) or glial (C6) origin, pituitary-derived cells (AtT20, GH4C1), hepatocytes (BRL3A), or in fibroblasts (RAT1, NIH-3T3, CHO) (Table 1). In contrast with cathepsin S, cathepsin B and cathepsin L mRNAs were expressed in high levels in all of the cell lines tested (Table 1).



Intrigued by the very selective expression of cathepsin S in rat tissues and cell lines of different embryonic origin, and particularly by the possibility that it is confined to the sole immunoeffector cell type in rat brain, we compared the expression of cathepsin S, B, and L mRNAs after unilateral ECL of adult rat brain, a classical paradigm for neuronal degeneration and reactive synaptogenesis with a very pronounced microglial response(17, 23) .

We observed a significant up-regulation of cathepsin S mRNA in the outer molecular layer of the deafferented dentate gyrus and a dramatic increase at the wound site 8 days after lesion (Fig. 2F, Fig. 3, and Fig. 4). In contrast to this, there was only a slight increase in cathepsin B and cathepsin L mRNA expression in the outer molecular layer and a moderate increase at the wound site (Fig. 2, panels B and D). Analyses of emulsion-dipped sections showed that the increased signal for cathepsin S in the dentate gyrus and around the wound was a result of its expression in a greater number of cells and also due to an increased number of transcripts in individual cells ( Fig. 3and Fig. 4).


Figure 2: Expression of cathepsin B (panels A and B), cathepsin L (panels C and D), and cathepsin S (panels E and F) mRNA in adult rat brain 8 days after entorhinal cortex lesion. Adjacent horizontal sections were probed with S-labeled cRNA probes. Panels A, C, and E represent the contralateral side to the lesion; panels B, D, and F represent the ipsilateral side. Note the dramatic increase in cathepsin S expression in the outer molecular layer, ipsilateral to the lesion, and in the entorhinal cortex at the site and around the lesion (panel F). Arrows in panels B and D point to subtle increases of cathepsin B and cathepsin L mRNA expression in the ipsilateral outer molecular layer. DG, dentate gyrus, O, outer molecular layer, ECx, entorhinal cortex.




Figure 3: Cathepsin S mRNA expression in the entorhinal cortex after unilateral ECL. Panels A and B are dark field photomicrographs (magnification 200times) showing cathepsin S mRNA expression in the unlesioned entorhinal cortex (panel A) and in the lesioned entorhinal cortex around the wound site (panel B). Cathepsin S expression is in greater number of cells in the lesioned site (panel B) compared to analogous area of the control side (panel A). Statistical analyses of multiple fields (at magnification 400times) of adjacent sections scored in a blinded fashion suggests a 5-fold increase in the number of cathepsin S expressing cells (43 ± 4 at the wound site and 8 ± 1 at the control side). Panels C and D represent high power (magnification 400times) bright field micrographs showing increased levels of expression of cathepsin S mRNA (seen as denser silver grain packets) in the lesioned entorhinal cortex (panel D) versus the intact side (panel C).




Figure 4: Cathepsin S mRNA expression in the intact and deafferented dentate gyrus after ECL. Panels A and B are dark field photomicrographs (magnification 200times) of a horizontal section through the dentate gyrus, showing cathepsin S mRNA expression in the unlesioned contralateral dentate gyrus (panel A) and in the deafferented dentate gyrus (panel B). Cathepsin S expression is numerous cells in the outer molecular layer (OML) of the deafferented dentate gyrus (panel B) compared to analogous area (shown by an arrow) of the contralateral side (panel A). Statistical analyses of multiple fields (at magnification 200times) of adjacent sections scored in a blinded fashion suggests a 4-fold increase in the number of cathepsin S expressing cells (42 ± 4 at the deafferented side and 11 ± 1 at the control intact side). Panels C and D represent high power (magnification 400times) bright field micrographs showing increased levels of expression of cathepsin S mRNA (seen as denser silver grain packets) in the deafferented dentate gyrus (panel D) in comparison with its expression in the cells from the contralateral side (panel C).



Staining of an adjacent section with OX42, an antibody that recognizes different populations of tissue macrophages and microglia, by virtue of binding to their C3bi complement receptor, gave a pattern similar to the signal obtained with cathepsin S cRNA probe in the deafferented dentate gyrus and around the wound (not shown), suggesting that the cathepsin S positive cells in these areas are likely to be activated microglia and blood-born macrophages, respectively.

To further address the question of cellular specificity of cathepsin S expression, we generated primary mixed glial cultures from rat neonatal forebrains. Northern analysis of total RNA from mixed glial cultures showed significant levels of mRNAs for cathepsin S, cathepsin B, and cathepsin L (not shown). However, upon subculturing to virtually pure microglia, type 1 astrocytes, and O2A progenitors, cathepsin S mRNA could be detected only in microglia. Cathepsin B and cathepsin L transcripts were present in all three cell types (Fig. 5).


Figure 5: Expression of cathepsin S, cathepsin B, and cathepsin L mRNAs in primary rat glial cultures. Total RNA was isolated from pure primary glial cultures, and 10-30 µg were subjected to Northern analysis with random primer, P-labeled cDNA probes. The purity of the type 1 astrocytes, O2A, and microglia cultures was established by diagnostic immunofluorescent staining (see ``Materials and Methods''). Rcat, rat cathepsin; Mi, microglia; T1, type 1 astrocytes; O2A, O2A progenitor culture.



In the light of these findings and the finding that the levels of cathepsin S mRNA are dramatically increased in what appears to be activated microglia/macrophages in vivo, it was interesting to see if cathepsin S activity was secreted from activated macrophages or microglial cells. It is well established that one of the early responses of macrophages to activation by inflammatory mediators is an increase in the levels of lysosomal hydrolases and their secretion (24) . We examined the ability of two classical mediators of macrophage activation, bacterial endotoxin (LPS) and IFN, to stimulate the secretion of cathepsin S activity from resident and thioglycolate-elicited peritoneal mouse macrophages and from a microglial cell line, N-13. We observed a significant increase in the secretion of cathepsin S activity following a 5-h treatment with LPS (Table 2). Treatment with IFN for 5 h had no effect on this secretion. Also, treatment with both LPS and IFN did not affect the LPS-induced secretion (Table 2). The thioglycolate-elicited macrophages were more responsive to LPS than the resident macrophages and the microglial cells. In all cases, there was a substantial increase in cathepsin S activity secreted in response to LPS; these results support the hypothesis that upon activation, macrophages/microglia secrete enzymatically active cathepsin S.



It has been argued that the lysosomal hydrolases and metalloproteases that are secreted from activated macrophages/microglia are involved in the clearance of degenerative debris and in the ECM remodeling(24, 25) . Based on the findings that cathepsin S can retain activity at neutral pH and can be actively secreted, and based on the observation that its expression is dramatically increased in activated microglia/macrophages after ECL, we argued that this enzyme takes part in the processes of ECM dissolution. Therefore, we tested the capacity of cathepsin S to degrade various ECM components (fibronectin, laminin, collagen, chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans and heparan-sulfate proteoglycans) in vitro. Purified, recombinant, human cathepsin S was incubated with various ECM components at acidic or neutral conditions, and the reaction products were analyzed by silver staining after SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Cathepsin S efficiently cleaves laminin, fibronectin (Fig. 6, A and B) and collagen I and IV (data not shown). Fibronectin is a better substrate than laminin at acidic pH since it is more efficiently cleaved by cathepsin S at acidic pH as compared with neutral pH (compare lane 1 in Fig. 6A with lane 3 in Fig. 6B, fibronectin panel). In contrast, laminin is more efficiently cleaved at neutral pH since the concentration of cathepsin S that leads to complete proteolysis at neutral pH results in only a partial proteolysis at acidic pH (compare lane 1 in Fig. 6A with lane 3 in 6B, laminin panel).


Figure 6: Proteolysis of fibronectin and laminin by cathepsin S. 10 µg of bovine fibronectin or laminin were incubated with 300 or 30 ng of recombinant human cathepsin S at acidic pH or neutral pH, and the products were analyzed as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' The numbers in the center correspond to molecular weight standards (Sigma). A, proteolysis at neutral pH. Lanes 1, 10 µg of fibronectin or laminin incubated with 300 ng of recombinant human cathepsin S for 150 min; lanes 2, same as lanes 1 except 5 µM E-64 was included in the mixture; lanes 3, undigested fibronectin or laminin. B, proteolysis at acidic pH. Lanes 1, 10 µg of fibronectin or laminin, incubated with 300 ng of cathepsin S for 15 min; lanes 2, same as lanes 1 except 30 ng of cathepsin S was used; lanes 3, same as lanes 1 except the incubation time was 150 min; lanes 4, same as lanes 2 except the incubation time was 150 min; lanes 5, same as lanes 3 except 5 µM E-64 was included; lanes 6, undigested fibronectin and laminin.



Next, we examined the ability of cathepsin S to degrade chondroitin sulfate and heparan sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs and HSPGs). The CSPGs, two brain proteoglycans, neurocan and phosphacan, were radioiodinated and used. Neurocan is a developmentally regulated, neuronal CSPG with extracellular localization during brain development, while in adult brain it is localized mostly intracellularly(26) . Phosphacan is a secreted form of the receptor tyrosine phosphates beta/, preferentially expressed in glial cells(27, 28) . Immunohistochemical data show an increase in its expression in the outer molecular layer of the dentate gyrus after ECL. (^2)Upon treatment with cathepsin S, the precursor bands of neurocan were converted to a prominent 45-kDa intermediate within 15 min (Fig. 7A, left panel). In the case of phosphacan, a series of smaller molecular mass products (between 50 and 90 kDa) was observed (Fig. 7A, right panel). Prolonged incubation of chondroitinase-treated neurocan or phosphacan with cathepsin S resulted in complete degradation of both proteoglycans at both acidic and neutral pH (not shown).


Figure 7: Cleavage of brain chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans by cathepsin S. Radioiodinated neurocan or phosphacan were subjected to proteolysis by cathepsin S. The reaction products were analyzed as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' The numbers in the center correspond to molecular weight standards. A, digestions of chondroitinase-treated neurocan or phosphacan by cathepsin S at acidic pH. Lanes 1, radioiodinated chondroitinase-treated neurocan or phosphacan incubated with 300 ng of human cathepsin S for 15 min; lanes 2, same as lanes 1 except with 30 ng of cathepsin S; lanes 3, same as lanes 1 except 5 µM E64 was included in the reaction mixtures; lanes 4, proteoglycans incubated only with assay buffer for 15 min; lanes 5, undigested proteoglycans. B, digestions of native proteoglycans by cathepsin S at acidic and neutral pH. Lanes 1, radioiodinated native neurocan or phosphacan incubated with 300 ng of cathepsin S for 15 min at acidic pH; lanes 2, same as lanes 1 except the incubation time was 150 min; lanes 3, same as lanes 1 except the incubations were at neutral pH; lanes 4, same as lanes 2 except the incubations were at neutral pH; lanes 5, same as lanes 2 except 5 µM E-64 was included; lanes 6, undigested proteoglycans.



When native proteoglycans (not treated with chondroitinase) were exposed to cathepsin S, the enzyme was capable of generating virtually the same products with similar efficiency at both acidic and neutral pH (Fig. 7B). It is important to note that although the reaction mixtures contained more than a 1000-fold excess of BSA (used as a radiation scavenger), only the proteoglycans were efficiently degraded. It is interesting to note that the incubation of neurocan with a three times higher concentration of cathepsin B, under analogous conditions, did not lead to significant degradation of the CSPGs (not shown). Taken together, these results show preferential degradation of these proteoglycans by cathepsin S at both acidic and neutral conditions.


DISCUSSION

Rat cathepsin S mRNA exhibits a restricted pattern of expression. This is evident from the results of the in situ hybridization analysis of rat spleen and lung tissue (Fig. 1, A and B) as well as the screening for cathepsin S mRNA expression in different primary glial cultures and various cell lines ( Fig. 5and Table 1), which demonstrate that, in rat, cathepsin S mRNA is preferentially expressed in cells of mononuclear-phagocytic origin. This is consistent with the results of our previous study that showed that in rat brain, cathepsin S is expressed in cell types that have distribution pattern and morphology of microglia/macrophages(14) .

The human cathepsin S has been reported to be expressed in primary fibroblasts(13) ; we did not detect rat cathepsin S mRNA using a rat-specific cDNA probe in rat, mouse, or hamster fibroblasts (Table 1). This difference might be a result of species difference in the regulation of the expression of this enzyme due to differences in promoter structure and/or cellular factors.

The expression of cathepsin S is subject to profoundly tight and differential regulation. This is clear from the overwhelming increase in cathepsin S mRNA levels in the deafferented dentate gyrus and around the wound site after ECL (Fig. 2, panel F) compared to the slight increase in cathepsin B and cathepsin L mRNAs in these areas (Fig. 2, panels B and D). In this respect, it is noteworthy that while the structure of the promoter for human cathepsin B has all the features of a promoter for a genuine ``housekeeping'' protein (80% GC-rich, with 15 SP1 sites), the promoter for human cathepsin S has low GC content and contains 18 potential AP1 sites, which is a characteristic of promoters for highly regulatable proteins(16, 29) .

Microglia are the first cell type to be recruited in response to entorhinal cortex lesion. Hyperproliferation and activation of microglia in the outer molecular layer of the deafferented dentate gyrus occurs within 24 h after lesioning; the activated microglia exhibit a highly phagocytic phenotype(17) . There is also a major infiltration of blood-born macrophages at the wound site. We observed increased OX42 immunostaining in these regions (not shown), similar to the pattern of expression of cathepsin S mRNA ( Fig. 3and Fig. 4), suggesting that the cells expressing cathepsin S mRNA in the ipsilateral dentate gyrus and around the wound are likely to be activated microglia and blood-born macrophages. It has been established that the microglial response is maximal during the first week and that it declines within the second week when it is being replaced by an astroglial response(17) . Therefore, it is possible that cathepsin S mRNA is also expressed in reactive astrocytes that start to appear in the outer molecular layer of the deafferented dentate gyrus at that time (8 days post-lesion). This seems unlikely since we did not detect cathepsin S mRNA in primary cultures of type 1 astrocytes purified from rat brain (Fig. 5). Also, cathepsin S mRNA was not induced in cultures of type 1 astrocytes grown in the presence of dBcAMP (not shown); dBcAMP-treated type 1 astrocytes have been postulated to be in vitro homologs of reactive astrocytes(30) .

One of the major functions of microglia/macrophages is phagocytic removal of dead cells or cell remnants during brain development and after injury in adult brain(31) . They are also engaged in remodeling of the ECM by phagocytosis as well as by active secretion of neutral proteases such as elastase and plasminogen activator/plasminogen (32) and acid lysosomal hydrolases. In light of this, it is interesting to note that the secreted acid hydrolases have been shown to be solely responsible for the potent elastinolytic activity attributed to the activated macrophages; this has lead to the implication that these enzymes are involved in the pathophysiological remodeling of the extracellular matrix(33) . The involvement of cathepsin S in such a physiological function is further supported by our finding that the treatment of macrophages or microglia with LPS leads to 2-5-fold increase in secretion of cathepsin S activity and that cathepsin S cleaves various ECM components at neutral pH conditions, causing their complete and/or partial degradation (Fig. 7).

Cathepsin S efficiently cleaves fibronectin and laminin in vitro and might be involved in their metabolism in vivo, especially during development and after injury in adult brain when there is an increased production of these molecules (34, 35, 36) . We have also shown that cathepsin S can degrade neurocan and phosphacan, two brain CSPGs, at acidic and neutral pH. We have also found that cathepsin S is capable of degrading HSPGs at neutral pH (data not shown). In AD brains, CSPG and HSPG are components of the senile plaques(37, 38) . Interestingly, it has also been shown that CSPGs and HSPGs can protect the potentially neurotoxic amyloid beta peptide from proteolysis in vitro(39) and that the protein moiety of the proteoglycans is critical for amyloid beta fibril formation and persistence(40) . It is therefore possible that cathepsin S plays a modulatory role in the formation and persistence of amyloid fibrils in the senile plaques, particularly since it has been detected by immunocytochemistry around senile plaques in Alzheimer's disease brains(41) .

The fact that the expression of cathepsin S is tightly regulated and that it is capable of degrading extracellular matrix components under neutral pH suggests an important role for cathepsin S in the context of the mononuclear-phagocytic system, regarding processes of normal growth and development as well as during pathological conditions.


FOOTNOTES

*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants NS 26880 and NS K04 1788 (to L. A. D.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
Current address: Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Ave., New York, NY 10021.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology, New York University Medical Center, 550 First Ave., New York, NY 10016. Tel.: 212-263-7119; Fax: 212-263-7133; :Lakshmi.Devi{at}Med.NYU.Edu.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: ECM, extracellular matrix; ECL, entorhinal cortex lesion; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; DTT, dithiothreitol; BSA, bovine serum albumin; CSPG, chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan; HSPG, heparan sulfate proteoglycan.

(^2)
S. Petanceska, P. Canoll, and L. A. Devi, unpublished observations.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

-We thank Dr. Dieter Bromme for the recombinant human cathepsin S and Dr. Richard Margolis for the proteoglycans.


REFERENCES

  1. Katunuma, N. (1989) Intracellular Proteolysis: Mechanisms and Regulation. Japan Scientific press, Tokyo
  2. Sloane, B. (1990) Semin. Cancer Biol. 1, 137-152 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Ahmed, N. K., Martin, L. A., Watts, L. M., Palmer, J., Thornburg, L., Prior, J. and Esser, R. E. (1992) Biochem. Pharmacol. 44, 1201-1207 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Lah, T. T., Kokalj-Kunovar, M., Drobnic-Kosorok, M., Babnik, J., Golouh, R., Vrhovec, I., and Turk, V. (1992) Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler 373, 594-604
  5. Cataldo, A. M., and Nixon, R. A. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 3861-3865 [Abstract]
  6. Buck, M. R., Karustis, D. G., Day, N. A., Honn, K. V., and Sloane, B. (1992) Biochem. J. 282, 273-278 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Maciewicz, R. A., Wotton, S. F., Etherington, D. J., and Duance, V. C. (1990) FEBS Lett. 269, 189-193 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Xin, X.-Q., Gunesekera, B., and Mason, R. W. (1992) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 299, 334-339 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Shi, G. P., Munger, J. S., Meara, J. P., Rich, D., and Chapman, H. A. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 7258-7262 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Kirshke, H., Schmidt, I., Wiederanders, B. (1986) Biochem. J. 240, 455-459 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Bromme, D., Bonneau, P. R., Lachance, P., Wiederanders, B., Kirschke, H., Peterc, C., Thomas, D. Y., Storer, A. C., and Vernet, T. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 4832-4838 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Qian, F., Chan, S. J., Gong, Q., Bajkowski, A. S., Steiner, D. F., and Frankfater, A. (1991) Biomed. Biochim. Acta 50, 531-540 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Wiederanders, B., Bromme, D., Kirschke, H., Figura, K., Schmidt, B., and Peters, C. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 13708-13715 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Petanceska, S., Burke, S., Watson, S. J., and Devi, L. (1994) Neuroscience 53, 729-737
  15. Petanceska, S., and Devi, L. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 26038-26043 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Shi, G. P., Webb, A. C., Foster, K. E., Knoll, J. H., Lemere, C. A., Munger, J. S., and Chapman, H. A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 11530-11536 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Gehrmann, J., Schoen, S. W., and Kreutzberg, G. W. (1991) Acta Neuropathol. 82, 442-455 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Amaral, D. G., Avendano, C., and Cowan, W. M. (1980) J. Comp. Neurol. 194, 171-191 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. McCarthy, K. D., and deVellis, J. (1980) J. Cell Biol. 80, 890-902
  20. Sacerdote, P., Denis-Donini, S., Paglia, P., Granucci, F., Panerai, A. E., and Ricciardi-Castagnoli, P. (1993) Glia 9, 305-310 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , pp. 18.56-18.57, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  22. Grumet, M., Milev, P., Sakurai, T., Karthikeyan, L., Bourdon, M., Margolis, R. K., and Margolis, R. U. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 12142-12146 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Matthews, D. A., Cotman, C., and Lynch, G. (1976) Brain Res. 115, 1-21 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Adams, D. O., and Hamilton, T. A. (1984) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2, 283-318 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Perry, H. V., and Gordon, S. (1988) Trends Neurosci. 11, 85-88
  26. Rauch, U., Karthikeyan, L., Maurel, P., Margolis, R. U., and Margolis, R. K. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 19536-19547 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Canoll, P. D., Barnea, G., Levy, J., Sap, J., Ehrich, M., Silvennoinen, O., Schlessinger, J., and Musacchio, J. (1993) Dev. Brain Res. 75, 293-298 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Maurel, P., Rauch, U., Flad, M., Margolis, R. K., and Margolis, R. U. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 2512-2516 [Abstract]
  29. Fong, D., Chan, M. M., and Hsieh, W. T. (1991) Biomed. Biochim. Acta 50, 595-598 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Fedoroff, S., McAuley, W. A. J., Houle, J. D., and Devon, R. M. (1984) J. Neurosci. Res. 12, 15-27
  31. Thomas, E. W. (1992) Brain Res. Rev. 9, 61-74
  32. Nakajima, K., Shimojo, M., Hamanoue, M., Ishiura, S., Sugita, H., and Koshaka, S. (1992) J. Neurochem. 58, 1401-1408 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Reddy, V., Zhang, Q-Y., and Weiss, S. J. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 3849-3853 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Carbonetto, S. (1984) Trends Neurosci. 11, 382-387
  35. Letourneau, P. C., Condic, M. L., and Snow, D. M. (1994) J. Neurosci. 14, 915-928 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Liesi, P., Kaakkola, S., Dahl, D., and Vaheri, A. (1984) EMBO J. 3, 683-686 [Abstract]
  37. Snow, A. D., Mar, H., Nochlin, D., Sekiguchi, R. T., Kimata, K., Koike, Y., and Wight, T. N. (1990) Am. J. Pathol. 137, 1253-1270 [Abstract]
  38. Su, J. H., Cummings, B. J., and Cotman, C. W. (1992) Neuroscience 51, 801-813 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Shaffer, L. M., Brunden, K. R., Younkin, S. G., and Cohen, M. L. (1993) 24rd Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience 19, 1008
  40. Snow, A. D., Sekiguchi, R., Nochlin, D., Frase, P., Kimata, K., Mizutani, A., Arai, M., Schreier, A., and Morgan, D. (1992) Neuron 12, 219-234
  41. Lemere, C., Munger, J. S., Shi, G. P., Natkin, L., Haass, C., Chapman, H. A., and Selkoe, D. (1995) Am. J. Pathol. 146, 848-860 [Abstract]

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.