©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Transcriptional Regulation of the Interleukin-2 Gene in Normal Human Peripheral Blood T Cells
CONVERGENCE OF COSTIMULATORY SIGNALS AND DIFFERENCES FROM TRANSFORMED T CELLS (*)

(Received for publication, September 27, 1995; and in revised form, December 20, 1995)

Christopher C. W. Hughes (§) Jordan S. Pober

From the Molecular Cardiobiology Program, Boyer Center for Molecular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06536

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

To study transcriptional regulation in normal human T cells, we have optimized conditions for transient transfection. Interleukin-2 (IL-2) promoter-reporter gene behavior closely parallels the endogenous gene in response to T cell receptor and costimulatory signals. As assessed with mutagenized promoters, the most important IL-2 cis-regulatory elements in normal T cells are the proximal AP-1 site and the NF-kappaB site. Both primary activation, with phytohemagglutinin or antibodies to CD3, and costimulation, provided by pairs of CD2 antibodies or B7-positive (B cells) or B7-negative (endothelial) accessory cells, are mediated through the same cis-elements. Interestingly, the nuclear factor of activated T cell sites are much less important in normal T cells than in Jurkat T cells. We conclude that IL-2 transcriptional regulation differs in tumor cell lines compared with normal T cells and that different costimulatory signals converge on the same cis-elements in the IL-2 promoter.


INTRODUCTION

The initiation of an immune response involves interaction between foreign antigenic peptide bound to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) (^1)molecules on the antigen-presenting cell (APC) and a cognate antigen receptor on the T cell(1) . Under physiological conditions, specific antigen-MHC complexes are usually limiting, and T cells require additional costimulatory signals to be fully activated(2) . The major source of such signals appears to be direct interaction of cell surface ligands on the T cell and the APC.

T cells that receive the correct combination of T cell receptor (TCR)-mediated and costimulatory signals enter the cell cycle, express activation antigens such as CD69 and CD25, and begin synthesis of several cytokines, including the T cell autocrine/paracrine growth factor interleukin-2 (IL-2)(2, 3) . IL-2 is an essential factor required for progression of newly activated T cells from G(1) to S phase, and the quantity of IL-2 produced is a major determinant of whether an effective response can be generated. Moreover, inadequate IL-2 synthesis can lead to T cell death or induction of a state of unresponsiveness known as clonal anergy(4) .

Numerous T cell surface molecules have been suggested as mediators of costimulatory signals, the best characterized being CD2, interacting primarily with CD58 (LFA-3) and CD59 on the APC(5, 6, 7, 8) , and CD28, interacting with CD80 (B7-1) and CD86 (B7-2/B70) on the APC(9, 10, 11, 12, 13) . CTLA-4 is a second T cell molecule that interacts with the same ligands as CD28 and may also mediate costimulatory signals(14) , although this has been disputed(15, 16) . However, costimulatory activity is not limited to these molecules(17, 18) . Both the CD2 and CD28 pathways of costimulation are thought to increase the level of IL-2 transcription in human T cells, although this may not be the case for CD28 in murine T cell clones(19) . CD28-mediated signals may additionally stabilize IL-2 mRNA and affect post-transcriptional nuclear processing(19, 20) .

The IL-2 gene is not actively transcribed in resting T cells. Transcription of IL-2 can be detected as early as 40 min after activation, leading to peak levels of mRNA around 6 h and a return to near zero levels by 12-18 h(2, 5) . Approximately 300 base pairs of the IL-2 promoter are sufficient to confer cell-specific, inducible expression to reporter gene constructs(21) , although other regulatory sequences may lie outside of this region(22) . Within these 300 base pairs, several transcription factor-binding sites have been identified as positive regulatory elements in tumor T cells (see Table 2), including proximal and distal specific sequences for the nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) (21, 23, 24) and proximal and distal sequences for AP-1(25, 26) , for NF-kappaB(27, 28) , for NIL-2A(29) , for CD28-activated factors(30) , and for octamer factors(31) . An additional AP-1 site has also recently been identified just downstream of the dNFAT sequence(25) , which we have designated as NFAP-1 as it appears to be functionally a part of the ``NFAT'' binding sequence. Also, a binding site for SP1 and EGR-1 has been identified immediately upstream of the distal NFAT site(32) . Many of these sites vary from consensus sequences in other genes, and it appears that these differences account, at least in part, for the T cell-specific expression of the IL-2 gene(33) .



Activation of T cells through the TCR-CD3 signaling pathway leads to the activation of transcription factors specific to several of these sites. It has been proposed that costimulatory signals increase transcription by either 1) altering the composition of transcription factors that bind to sites targeted by TCR/CD3-derived signals or 2) inducing new factors that bind to novel combinations of sites. We have previously presented evidence that human umbilical vein endothelial cell (EC) costimulation modifies the composition of the AP-1 complex binding to the proximal AP-1 (pAP-1) site in mitogen-activated T cells (34) . Furthermore, in murine LBRM-33 cells, IL-1 induces c-Jun, which combines with c-Fos protein induced by TCR-mediated signals, and binds to the AP-1 sites(35) . IL-1 also induces AP-1 proteins in mouse EL-4 cells(36) . However, normal human T cells constitutively express high levels of c-Jun and do not respond to IL-1 as a costimulator(34) . In Jurkat cells, CD28 has been found to induce a transcription factor composed of NFKB1 (p50), RelA (p65), and c-Rel (37, 38) that binds to a variant NF-kappaB site called the CD28 response element (CD28RE)(39) . Recently, this site has been found to be also targeted by signals other than CD28(40) . It is not known whether different accessory cell types activate different combinations of nuclear factors.

Much of the information on IL-2 transcription has been obtained from studies of tumor cell lines such as Jurkat, LBRM-33, and EL-4, although recently, the role of NF-kappaB regulation in IL-2 transcription has been studied in CD4 T cell clones(41) . Little information is available on transcriptional control in freshly isolated normal human T cells. The major barrier to such studies has been technical; it is very difficult to measure the low transcriptional rate of the IL-2 gene observed in normal T cells by conventional assays, such as nuclear run-off. Also, such cells are generally resistant to transfection by reporter genes. It has been reported that human peripheral blood mononuclear cells can be made transfection-competent by a brief period of suboptimal stimulation with the polyclonal mitogenic lectin phytohemagglutinin (PHA)(42) . Unfortunately, this approach has proven inconsistent and has not been widely used. Here we describe an optimization of this technique that permits routine measurement of IL-2 transcription, which is responsive to TCR and costimulatory signals, in small numbers of normal human blood T cells. In this study, we have used this model to characterize IL-2 transcription in normal human T cells and find that the nuclear factor-binding sites that are important in these cells differ from those required for optimal transcription in Jurkat cells. Furthermore, we have characterized the sites required for responsiveness to various costimulatory signals and accessory cell types.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Preparation and Transfection of T Cells

Normal human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were prepared by centrifugation of whole blood over lymphocyte separation medium according to the manufacturer's instructions (Litton Bionetics, Kensington, MD). Blood was obtained by venipuncture of normal healthy donors. Cells were cultured for 19.5-20 h in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% fetal calf serum, antibiotics (Life Technologies, Inc.), and 50 mM 2-mercaptoethanol with 1 µg/ml PHA-L (Sigma) at 3 times 10^6 cells/ml to induce transfection competence. After washing, cells were resuspended in fresh lymphocyte medium at 2 times 10^7/ml. Aliquots of 0.25 ml were electroporated in a Bio-Rad Gene Pulser at 250 V and 960 microfarads at room temperature in the presence of 60 µg/ml reporter gene DNA (see below). Where different mutant promoters were being compared in a single experiment, pXGH (growth hormone driven by the metallothionein promoter) or pCMV-beta-gal (beta-galactosidase driven by the cytomegalovirus promoter) (10 µg/ml) was added to control for transfection efficiency. Normalizing for transfection efficiency was not necessary when a single promoter (usually wild-type) was being assayed under different conditions; here separate transfections were pooled before use. The gap width of the cuvettes was 0.4 cm, which resulted in a of 45-50 ms. Jurkat cells, treated with PHA in parallel with PBMC, were electroporated under the same conditions, except that a volume of 0.5 ml was used, which reduced to 20-25 ms. After electroporation, cells were immediately removed and added to 10 ml of medium, washed, and resuspended in fresh medium. Cells were plated (see below) after resting for 2 h at 37 °C.

Sorting of Cells by FACS

PBMC were electroporated as described above and then incubated with antibodies directly conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate or phycoerythrin for 20 min on ice in phosphate-buffered saline, 0.1% mouse serum. After washing, cells were resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium, 0.5% fetal calf serum, and aliquots were sorted on a FACScan cell sorter (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA). mAbs used were as follows: anti-CD4-fluorescein isothiocyanate and anti-CD8-phycoerythrin against T cells (Sigma), anti-CD19-phycoerythrin against B cells, and anti-CD14-fluorescein isothiocyanate against monocytes (the latter two from Becton Dickinson).

Detection of Reporter Genes

For detection of luciferase and beta-galactosidase activity, plates were spun down, and 150 µl of medium was removed (this was saved for IL-2 bioassay; see below). To the remaining 50 µl containing the cells was added 100 µl of 1.5 times reporter lysis buffer (Promega, Madison, WI). This amount of medium did not interfere significantly with the subsequent assays. Light output from luciferase was assayed in a luminometer (Berthold LB9501, Wallac, Gaithersburg, MD) using acetyl-CoA to prolong the usable signal (Promega). Forty µl of lysate was assayed in 100 µl of assay buffer. Experiments were performed in triplicate, and results are expressed as mean ± S.E. Human growth hormone secreted into the medium was detected by immunoradioisotopic assay (Nichols Institute, San Juan Capistrano, CA). beta-Galactosidase activity was measured using a commercially available kit (Promega).

Culture of Endothelial Cells and B Cells with T Lymphocytes

Human umbilical vein EC were plated in fibronectin-coated round bottom 96-well plates and grown to confluence in medium M199 containing 20% fetal bovine serum, antibiotics, endothelial cell growth supplement, and heparin as described previously (43, 44) . B cells (1 times 10^4/well) were suspended in lymphocyte medium and plated into round bottom 96-well plates. After transfection and washing, T cells (3 times 10^5/well) were added to EC, to B cells, or alone to fibronectin-coated wells in lymphocyte medium. This number of T cells represents a ratio of 30:1 over APC. The same number of Jurkat T cells was added to similarly coated wells. PHA was used at 5 µg/ml. Anti-CD3 mAb OKT3 was bound to anti-mouse Ig-coated beads according to the manufacturer's instructions (Dynal, Inc., Great Neck, NY). The final concentration of bead-bound mAb in the well was 0.5-1 µg/ml. Phorbol ester (PMA; Sigma) was used at 10 ng/ml and ionomycin at 200 ng/ml. The stimulating anti-CD2 mAbs CB6 and GD10 (a gift of Chris Benjamin, Biogen Inc., Cambridge, MA) were purified from ascites and used at 1 µg/ml. Anti-CD2 mAb TS2/18 and anti-LFA-3 mAb TS2/9 (a gift of Tim Springer, Center for Blood Research, Boston) were purified from ascites and used at 10 µg/ml. Anti-CD28 mAbs 3D10 (a gift of Gary Gray, Repligen, Cambridge, MA), 9.3 (a gift of J. Ledbetter, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Seattle), and L293 (Becton Dickinson) were used at 1 µg/ml. CTLA-4-Ig fusion protein, control Ig fusion protein, mAb 9.3 Fab fragments, and control Fab fragments were also gifts of Gary Gray and were used at 10 µg/ml.

IL-2 Bioassay

The concentration of IL-2 in the medium was determined by HT-2 bioassay as described previously(34) . HT-2 cells were a gift of A. Abbas (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston). At least three serial dilutions of each supernatant were tested, and results are shown as mean ± S.D. None of the reagents used were found to significantly alter HT-2 cell survival.

Generation of IL-2 Promoter Mutations

A 600-base pair HindIII fragment of the human IL-2 promoter (a gift of G. Crabtree, Stanford University, Stanford, CA) was subcloned into the luciferase reporter plasmid pGL2-Enhancer (Promega), and the orientation was confirmed by restriction enzyme mapping. Three base pair mutations in individual cis-elements were generated by recombinant PCR(45) . Three base pair mutations were selected that altered nucleotides known to be critical for nuclear factor binding (see Table 2). Reaction conditions were as follows: 100 pg of template, 20 pmol of each primer, 2 mM MgCl(2), and 200 µM each dNTP in 1 times polymerase buffer with 1 unit of Taq polymerase in a final volume of 50 µl; initial denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min; amplification for 30 cycles (95 °C for 30 s, 50-53 °C (depending on primer pair) for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min); and final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. Overhangs at the 3`-end, generated by Taq terminal transferase activity, were removed by treatment with T4 DNA polymerase (46) . Amplification products were separated on 1.5% low melting point agarose gels (Sea Plaque LM, FMC Corp. BioProducts, Rockland, ME); bands were cut out and purified; and the two halves of the promoter generated by the first round of PCR were then recombined by PCR. The promoters were subcloned back into pGL2-Enhancer, and the sequences were confirmed by dideoxy sequencing (U. S. Biochemical Corp.). Large-scale DNA preparations were performed by selective adsorption to resin columns according to the manufacturer's instructions (QIAGEN Inc., Chatsworth, CA). Experiments comparing different promoter mutations were performed with at least two independent plasmid preparations. Experiments using the wild-type promoter were repeated with more than five independent plasmid preparations.

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay

Probes of 18-30 base pairs (synthesized by the Oligonucleotide Synthesis Facility of the Boyer Center for Molecular Medicine) were end-labeled using [-P]ATP (DuPont NEN) and T4 kinase and purified over Sephadex G-25 columns. Nuclear extract, normalized for protein concentration, was prepared from PHA-activated PBMC and analyzed as described previously(34) .


RESULTS

Transfection of Normal Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes

To investigate the regulation of IL-2 transcription in normal human T cells, we have developed a reproducible assay based on transient transfection by electroporation of IL-2 promoter-luciferase reporter gene constructs. The technique is sufficiently sensitive to detect luciferase activity in as few as 8 times 10^4 cells (40 µl of a 150-µl lysate), allowing routine analysis of microwell cultures.

Circulating human T cells are not transfectable. This has led most investigators to work with T cell tumor lines, cells that may not accurately reflect normal T cell behavior (see below). However, we have found that the T cells in a freshly isolated population of PBMC, upon stimulation with a concentration of PHA (1 µg/ml) that is insufficient to cause significant IL-2 secretion, pass through a window of transfection competency. The mitogen PHA polyclonally activates T cells by binding with high affinity to the TCR, but not to CD3, and inducing calcium fluxes in a similar manner to anti-CD3 or anti-TCR mAb (47) . Thus, presentation of antigen by MHC molecules is bypassed. In the two separate experiments shown in Fig. 1, PBMC were transfected by electroporation as described under ``Experimental Procedures'' at the indicated times after PHA stimulation; luciferase was assayed in all cases after restimulation for 6 h with PHA (5 µg/ml) plus PMA (50 nM). A sharp peak of luciferase activity was found for transfection at 20 h (Experiment 1) and 19.5 h (Experiment 2). We have found consistently high responses when cells are transfected during this window.


Figure 1: Optimal time for transfection of normal T cells. Cells were cultured with 1 µg/ml PHA for the indicated times and then transfected with the wild-type IL-2 promoter-luciferase reporter plasmid (60 µg/ml) as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Cells were restimulated with PHA (5 µg/ml) and PMA (50 nM) and harvested 6 h later for assay of luciferase. Means of triplicate determinations are shown for luciferase expression. Standard errors were <10% of the mean. Data points indicate relative light units: box, Experiment 1; up triangle, Experiment 2. Each curve is an independent experiment.



To determine the time course of transcription mediated by the IL-2 promoter in transfected normal T cells, we transfected cells as described, stimulated them with optimal doses of PHA and PMA, and then assayed luciferase activity and secreted IL-2 over the next 48 h. As shown in Fig. 2, onset of transcription is rapid, being easily detectable at 2 h. Transcription peaks between 4 and 8 h and declines rapidly to 20% of peak levels by 18 h and then more slowly to near basal levels by 48 h. These kinetics are consistent with previously reported kinetics of mRNA appearance following the activation of resting human blood T cells (5) and parallel the behavior of IL-2 promoter-reporter genes in the widely used T cell tumor line, Jurkat (data not shown and (2) ). More important, no transcription was detectable in transfected PBMC in the absence of additional stimulation, despite the prior exposure to low concentrations of PHA.


Figure 2: Time course of IL-2 promoter activity and IL-2 synthesis in transfected normal T cells. Normal T cells were transfected with the wild-type IL-2 promoter-luciferase reporter plasmid (60 µg/ml) as described under ``Experimental Procedures'' and cultured in the presence of PHA (5 µg/ml) and PMA (50 nM) for the indicated times before harvest of the supernatant for IL-2 bioassay and of the cells for luciferase assay. Means and standard errors are as described for Fig. 1. No luciferase activity above background levels or IL-2 was detected in the absence of PHA plus PMA. Data are representative of one of three experiments with similar results. box, relative light units; , units/milliliter IL-2.



Secreted IL-2 was measured as an indicator of the activity of the endogenous gene in the medium of the same cultures. No secreted IL-2 is detectable in the absence of stimulation, indicating that the native IL-2 gene is not active as a result of the prior manipulations to render the cells transfection-competent. IL-2 is first measurable in the medium at 3-6 h and then rapidly increases over the next 20 h. Levels begin to plateau after 24 h. These data are also consistent with previously published reports of resting T cells(34, 48) .

The Transfected IL-2 Promoter Can Only Be Activated in T Cells

An important consideration in interpreting our data is that we transfect a mixed population of cells that, in addition to T cells, contains monocytes, B cells, natural killer cells, and dendritic cells. We have found that highly purified T cells cannot be made transfection-competent by treatment with PHA alone (data not shown). Therefore, to determine which cell types in the unfractionated PBMC population are expressing the IL-2 promoter-luciferase construct under the stimulation conditions we use, we sorted cells by FACS after transfection using directly conjugated mouse anti-human mAb specific for CD4 T cells, CD8 T cells, B cells, and monocytes. Sorting produced populations of >99.5% purity. When assayed for luciferase activity, only CD4 T cells and, to a lesser extent, CD8 T cells expressed significant activity in response to PHA plus PMA. An equal number of monocytes or B cells (10-fold more than are present in unfractionated peripheral blood mononuclear cell preparations) expressed little to no activity (Fig. 3). In additional experiments, we confirmed the complete absence of luciferase activity in the total non-CD4/non-CD8 cell population (data not shown). Luciferase is detectable in this population when the SV40 promoter is used to drive reporter gene expression (pGL2-Con), indicating that some cells in the non-T cell population are transfectable (data not shown). In the experiment shown in Fig. 3(and data not shown), the endogenous gene, measured as IL-2 secretion, was also only active in the T cells (CD4, 29 units/ml; CD8, 2 units/ml; and monocytes, B cells, and non-T cells, not detectable). These data confirm that in the population of cells used in our experiments, only CD4 T cells and, to a lesser extent, CD8 T cells express the transfected IL-2 promoter-luciferase construct.


Figure 3: The transfected IL-2 promoter is only active in T cells. Total PBMC were transfected with the wild-type IL-2 promoter-luciferase reporter plasmid (60 µg/ml) as described under ``Experimental Procedures'' and then sorted by FACS using mAbs specific for CD4 (T cells), CD8 (T cells), CD19 (B cells), and CD14 (monocytes). Sorting produced populations of >99.5% purity. IL-2 secretion for the purified stimulated populations was as follows: CD4 cells, 29 units/ml; CD8 cells, 2 units/ml; and B cells and monocytes, not detectable. Means and standard errors are as described for Fig. 1. Data are representative of one of two similar experiments. RLU, relative light units; open bars, unstimulated; shaded bars, PHA + PMA.



Response of the Transfected Cells to Various Stimulators and Costimulators

We next investigated the response of the IL-2 promoter in normal T cells to various primary (T cell receptor-directed) and secondary (costimulatory) signals in order to determine if transfected cells behave similarly to normal untransfected cells. It is well established that in normal T cells, the IL-2 promoter responds well to a combination of ionomycin, a calcium ionophore, and PMA, but only weakly to either agent alone(48) . We have confirmed that the transfected promoter behaves similarly (Table 1, Experiment 1) and that it parallels the response of the endogenous gene in these cells, measured as secreted IL-2. As we reported above, both the lectin PHA and anti-CD3 mAb OKT3, which activate T cells via the T cell receptor, also activate transcription of the reporter gene (Table 1, Experiment 2). PHA, which alone provides an exceptionally strong signal that in many cases bypasses the need for a costimulator, activated the IL-2 promoter almost 4-fold above background levels and induced significant IL-2 synthesis. OKT3 alone, however, only weakly activated the promoter and did not induce IL-2 synthesis. CD28 ligation on T cells provides strong costimulatory signals, but antibody to CD28 alone only weakly activated the promoter and again did not induce significant IL-2 synthesis. However, anti-CD28 mAb synergized with OKT3 to stimulate both IL-2 transcription and IL-2 synthesis. Finally, it has been previously shown that pairs of anti-CD2 mAbs can activate T cells and induce IL-2 synthesis in the absence of T cell receptor ligation. As shown in Table 1(Experiment 2), such mAbs stimulate IL-2 promoter-dependent transcription in transfected normal cells.



Effect of B7-positive and B7-negative Accessory Cells on IL-2 Promoter-dependent Transcription

We next examined the effect of different accessory cell populations on costimulation of IL-2 promoter-dependent transcription and IL-2 synthesis in normal T cells. We compared B cells, which express CD28 ligands, with EC, which do not. Three B cell lines were tested: JY, an Epstein-Barr virus-transformed line; Raji, an Epstein-Barr virus-positive Burkitt's lymphoma line; and BJAB, an Epstein-Barr virus-negative Burkitt's lymphoma line. All three lines expressed CD28 ligands, and results were similar, except that JY and BJAB cells were generally better costimulators of IL-2 synthesis than were Raji cells; data from experiments with JY and BJAB cells are presented. EC were tested from multiple donors with similar results, and representative results are shown.

As shown in Fig. 4A, both B cells and EC augmented reporter gene transcription in PHA-activated normal T cells above the level induced by PHA alone. Over several experiments, augmentation ranged from 2- to 7-fold, with EC and B cells augmenting to approximately the same level. Expression of the endogenous gene was also augmented, but B cells seemed to be much more effective at augmenting secreted IL-2 than were EC (Fig. 4B). Both B cells and EC also costimulated T cells purified by FACS. In this case, little or no luciferase or secreted IL-2 was detectable in the absence of accessory cells. IL-2 promoter-dependent transcription was detectable in both highly purified CD4 and CD8 T cells stimulated by accessory cells, and both cell types secreted IL-2. CD4 T cells were severalfold more responsive than CD8 T cells (data not shown).


Figure 4: Different accessory cells costimulate through different surface ligands. Normal T cells were transfected with the wild-type IL-2 promoter-luciferase reporter plasmid (60 µg/ml) as described under ``Experimental Procedures'' and cultured for 12 h before harvest of the supernatant for IL-2 bioassay and of the cells for luciferase assay. Transfected cells were stimulated with PHA (5 µg/ml) and cultured with EC (1 times 10^4/well) or with BJAB cells (1 times 10^4/well) in the presence of control mAb K16/16 (10 µg/ml), anti-CD2 mAb TS2/18 (10 µg/ml), control Ig (10 µg/ml), or CTLA-4-Ig (10 µg/ml). Cells were also cultured with PHA in the absence of accessory cells or blocking reagents. A, luciferase expression; B, IL-2 secretion. Means ± S.E. (luciferase) of three wells are shown. Means ± S.D. (IL-2) are calculated as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Data are representative of one of two similar experiments. RLU, relative light units.



To identify the surface molecules involved in costimulation by B cells and EC, we used blocking antibodies and fusion proteins. mAb to CD2 blocked transcription and IL-2 secretion induced by B cells or EC (Fig. 4, A and B). Consistent with our previous findings(5) , anti-CD2 mAb could not completely inhibit EC costimulation. Blocking of B cell costimulation with anti-CD2 mAb was also incomplete, ranging from 40 to 90%. Most experiments were performed with anti-CD2 mAb TS2/18; however, we obtained identical results using anti-CD2 mAbs 35.1 and TS1/8 or anti-LFA-3 mAb TS2/9 (data not shown).

To investigate the role of CD28-mediated signals in this system, we used CTLA-4-Ig fusion protein, which binds to B7-1 and B7-2 and blocks interaction with their ligands, CD28 and CTLA-4. Consistent with our previous data demonstrating the absence of CD28 ligands on human EC and the lack of effect of CTLA-4-Ig or anti-CD28 mAb Fab fragments on EC costimulation of IL-2 secretion(49) , CTLA-4-Ig did not block EC costimulation of IL-2 promoter-dependent transcription (Fig. 4A). Similarly, this reagent did not block IL-2 secretion in response to EC. In sharp contrast, however, CTLA-4-Ig was very effective at blocking the costimulatory effects of CD28 ligand-bearing B cells on both transcription (Fig. 4A) and IL-2 secretion (Fig. 4B). Indeed, CTLA-4-Ig completely inhibited the augmented secretion of IL-2 in response to B cell costimulation. We have found substantially similar, although somewhat more variable, results using anti-CD28 mAb Fab fragments (data not shown).

Analysis of IL-2 Promoter Elements in Human Peripheral Blood T Cells

In the next series of experiments, we examined the function of different sequence elements in the IL-2 promoter by transfection of normal human T cells. Specific mutations were generated in several of the recognized cis-acting sites of the human IL-2 promoter by a recombinant PCR technique (Table 2). Three base pair mutations were selected that altered nucleotides known to be critical for nuclear factor binding. This approach allows sequences to be altered without affecting the spacing between individual sites. The result of each mutagenesis reaction was confirmed by sequencing, and the functional significance of the mutation was tested by annealing the inside primers and using this double-stranded probe to compete for protein binding with the wild-type sequence in an electrophoretic mobility shift assay. In all of the mutant constructs tested, the base pair changes we introduced were found to eliminate binding of the cognate transcription factors in vitro. It should be noted, however, that lack of binding in vitro does not necessarily rule out binding of factors in vivo. Representative data for the NF-kappaB site are shown in Fig. 5. In this experiment, nuclear factor bound to the wild-type NF-kappaB probe and was competed for by an excess of wild-type, but not mutant, probe.


Figure 5: Electrophoretic mobility shift assay analysis of nuclear factor binding to mutant NF-kappaB IL-2 promoter-binding site. The inside PCR primers used to create specific mutations were annealed to form a double-stranded probe for competition. The wild-type probe was end-labeled with [-P]ATP and incubated with 1-2 µg of nuclear extract for 10 min at room temperature in the presence of 100 ng of poly(dIbulletdC) and a 50-fold molar excess of unlabeled wild-type (WT) or mutant (MT) competitor probe. Bound and unbound probes were resolved on 6% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels, which were then dried and exposed to storage phosphor screens and analyzed on a Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager.



Each of the mutant promoters was cloned upstream of the luciferase reporter gene and transfected into normal T cells along with either pXGH (a growth hormone-expressing plasmid) or pCMV-beta-gal (a beta-galactosidase-expressing plasmid) to normalize for transfection efficiency. Transfected cells were then stimulated with PHA or with PHA plus PMA and harvested 12 h later. Levels of secreted IL-2 produced by the transfected cells varied by <10% between the different construct pools (data not shown). As shown in Fig. 6, mutations in several sites reduced transcription in PHA-activated normal T cells, including the dNFAT, NF-kappaB, and pAP-1 sites. Over several experiments, the pAP-1 site was consistently the most important single site. Mutation of this element reduced transcription by 85-95%. Mutating the NFAP-1 or dAP-1 sites generally had small effects (0-30% reduction), and in several experiments, mutating the dAP-1 site had no effect.


Figure 6: Effect of nuclear factor-binding site mutations on IL-2 transcription in normal T cells. Cells were transfected with the wild-type (WT) and mutant (mt) IL-2 promoter-luciferase reporter plasmids (60 µg/ml) along with a beta-galactosidase-expressing control plasmid (10 µg/ml) as described under ``Experimental Procedures'' and cultured for 12 h before harvest of the supernatant for IL-2 bioassay and of the cells for beta-galactosidase and luciferase assay. Transfected normal T cells (pretreated with 1 µg/ml PHA) were restimulated with PHA (5 µg/ml) and PMA (10 ng/ml) (closed bars) or with PHA alone (open bars). Luciferase expression for the different constructs was normalized to beta-galactosidase, and then corrected expression of each construct was normalized to the wild type. Uncorrected wild-type expression for normal T cells was 245 relative light units (RLU). Data are representative of one of three similar experiments. d/pNFAT is a construct with both NFAT sites mutated.



Interestingly, we noted a striking difference between normal T cells activated with PHA plus PMA and those activated with PHA alone. Specifically, the NF-kappaB site appeared to be much more important in the absence of the strong protein kinase C activator PMA (Fig. 6). We have repeated this experiment using normal T cells activated with anti-CD3 mAb OKT3 and find the same pattern as with PHA alone. Under these conditions, the pAP-1 and NF-kappaB sites appear to be the dominant sites, and there are significant contributions from the NFAT and NFAP-1 sites as well as the pOCT site (data not shown).

IL-2 Promoter cis-Elements Targeted by Different Accessory Cells

We have established that two different accessory cells, B cells and EC, costimulate T cells through different surface molecules. EC engage T cell CD2 via LFA-3 (and/or CD59), but do not stimulate through CD28. Conversely, B cells stimulate T cells through CD2 and CD28 (and/or CTLA-4). Clearly, both accessory cells may also stimulate through other pathways not examined in this report. We next wished to determine whether these different accessory cells activate the IL-2 promoter via the same combination of promoter cis-elements or through novel combinations. Peripheral blood T cells were transfected with the various mutant promoter constructs and then stimulated in the presence of B cells or EC. As shown in Fig. 7A, mutations of the various cis-elements affect B cell and EC costimulation equally. Specifically, mutations in the pAP-1 site or the NF-kappaB site were most effective in reducing transcription, with important contributions from the pOCT and NFAT sites. The pNFAT site was consistently more important than the dNFAT site, although mutations in both were additive. Interestingly, mutation of the CD28RE did not affect costimulation by the CD28 ligand-positive B cells, an unexpected result given the previous identification of this site as the target of CD28-mediated signaling. Over several experiments, using B cells as costimulators, we consistently failed to see a reduction in transcription as a result of mutating this site.


Figure 7: Effect of nuclear factor-binding site mutations on IL-2 transcription in normal T cells costimulated by EC, JY B cells, or costimulatory antibodies. Cells were transfected with the wildtype (WT) and mutant (MT) IL-2 promoter-luciferase reporter plasmids (50 µg/ml) along with pXGH or pCMV-beta-gal (10 µg/ml) as described under ``Experimental Procedures'' and cultured for 12 h before harvest. A, transfected T cells were cultured with 5 µg/ml PHA either alone or in the presence of EC (1 times 10^4/well) or JY cells (1 times 10^4/well). Data are representative of one of six similar experiments. B, transfected T cells were cultured either alone or with anti-CD2 mAbs CB6 and GD10 (1 µg/ml) or anti-CD3 mAb OKT3 (0.5-1 µg/ml) plus mAb 9.3 (1 µg/ml). Data are representative of one of two similar experiments. C, transfected T cells were cultured either alone or with OKT3 (0.5-1 µg/ml) in the presence of EC (1 times 10^4/well) or JY cells (1 times 10^4/well). Data are representative of one of two similar experiments. Shown are means ± S.E. of triplicate determinations. IL-2 in the medium did not vary by more than 10% between pools of cells transfected with each of the constructs. RLU, relative light units.



Finally, we repeated these experiments to compare defined costimulatory antibodies with accessory cells. We used an activating pair of anti-CD2 mAbs or an anti-CD28 mAb in conjunction with an anti-CD3 mAb (Fig. 7B) and compared these to EC and B cells (Fig. 7C). Again, the same combination of cis-regulatory elements was critical in each case. The pAP-1 and NF-kappaB sites were most important for CD2-, CD28-, or accessory cell-mediated costimulation. The pOCT and NFAT sites also contributed, along with the NFAP-1 site. Interestingly, although the CD28RE mutation did not affect CD2-, B cell-, or EC-mediated costimulation, it did have a variable effect on anti-CD28 mAb-mediated transcription: in three of five experiments, we saw a 25-50% reduction in transcription from the mutant CD28RE promoter compared with the wild-type promoter (Fig. 7B and data not shown).

Comparison of Normal T Cells with Jurkat Tumor Cells

The Jurkat T cell tumor line is the most widely used model for study of human transcriptional regulation of IL-2. Typically, these cells are stimulated with PHA plus PMA; activation in the absence of PMA is ineffective. In the experiments reported here, we also pretreated the Jurkat cells with low doses of PHA so that the conditions were comparable to those used for normal cells, although pilot experiments established that this treatment did not affect the observed results. Results with Jurkat T cells differed in several respects from those observed with normal T cells examined in parallel (Fig. 8). Most striking, mutation of the dNFAT and NFAP-1 sites was consistently much more effective at reducing transcription in Jurkat cells (up to 75%) than were these same mutations in normal T cells (0-50%). These results are consistent with previously published reports detailing the importance of the dNFAT site in Jurkat cells(21, 27, 50) . Mutation of the NF-kappaB site is without effect, but this may be attributable to the need to use PMA to activate the cells (see above).


Figure 8: Comparison of nuclear factor-binding site mutations on IL-2 transcription in normal T cells versus Jurkat tumor T cells. The normal T cell results are the same as those shown in Fig. 6for cells activated by PHA plus PMA. The conditions for transfection and activation of Jurkat cells are the same as for normal T cells. Uncorrected wild-type expression for normal T cells was 245 relative light units (RLU), and that for Jurkat cells was 67,599 relative light units. Data are representative of one of three similar experiments. d/pNFAT is a construct with both NFAT sites mutated. WT, wild-type construct; mt, mutant construct; open bars, normal T cells + PHA + PMA; closed bars, Jurkat tumor T cells (JK) + PHA + PMA.




DISCUSSION

Transfected normal human T cells provide a sensitive and physiologically relevant model for studying cytokine transcription. We have used this system to analyze the regulation of IL-2 synthesis and find that the human IL-2 promoter is inducible in these cells and responds to the same primary and costimulatory signals as the endogenous promoter. Furthermore, we find that the regulation of IL-2 transcription in normal T cells differs from that in the tumor cell line Jurkat. Finally, we have shown that transfected normal human T cells respond to costimulation by different APC and that B cells and EC signal through different costimulatory ligands, but target the same cis-acting elements in the IL-2 promoter.

In the experiments described here, we have transfected a mixed population of cells. However, by use of FACS of transfected cells, we have determined that only T cells express the luciferase reporter gene and that only T cells secrete IL-2. CD4 T cells are severalfold more active in this respect than CD8 T cells. Thus, in this system, the IL-2 promoter is highly T cell-specific.

A potential limitation of these studies is that we must culture normal T cells with 1 µg/ml PHA to induce transfection competence. Under these conditions, there is no significant IL-2 production. IL-2 is required for progression of T cells from G(1) to S phase(2) . This treatment, therefore, probably moves the T cells from G(0) to G(1). However, several observations demonstrate that transfected normal T cells still respond similarly to freshly isolated resting T cells. 1) Once transfected, the cells do not secrete IL-2 or transcribe the reporter gene unless further activated with mitogen. 2) The kinetics of the transcriptional response parallel those of the endogenous IL-2 gene in resting T cells. 3) OKT3 signals are weak and must be costimulated by anti-CD28 mAb to activate optimal IL-2 transcription. 4) The cells can receive costimulation from APC. 5) Costimulation can be blocked by mAb to CD2 or fusion proteins that bind CD28 ligands.

The IL-2 promoter contains numerous transcription factor-binding sites. Several of these have been shown by genomic footprinting to bind proteins, and some have been shown to be functional by transfection of mutant reporter gene constructs (21, 24, 28, 35, 39, 41, 50). However, nearly all of these studies have been done in tumor cell lines, with the assumption that gene regulation in these cells would be identical to that in normal T cells, and there is little or no direct information as to which sites are relevant for IL-2 transcription in normal nontransformed T cells. A step toward analysis of the IL-2 promoter in vivo has been made by the generation of transgenic mice with the IL-2 promoter driving lacZ expression(51) .

This study suggests that differences between normal cells and tumor cells do exist. In Jurkat cells, for example, we confirm that the dNFAT site is critical for inducible transcription regulated by the IL-2 promoter(50) . The nearby sequence we have designated as NFAP-1 was equally important. In normal T cells, however, these sites were far less important. We found instead that the pNFAT site is more important than the dNFAT site and that the NF-kappaB and pAP-1 sites are quantitatively most important. Mutation of either element almost completely blocked transcription in PHA-stimulated normal T cells. The recent generation of an NF-kappaB p50 knockout mouse suggests that the NF-kappaB site may be important in vivo as T cells from these mice failed to proliferate to mitogenic signals, suggesting a defect in the generation of IL-2(52) . Surprisingly, we found a difference in the importance of the NF-kappaB site in normal T cells in the presence and absence of PMA. Specifically, in the presence of PMA, mutation of the NF-kappaB site reduced transcription by <50%. However, when normal T cells were activated in the absence of PMA, by PHA, by OKT3 plus anti-CD28 mAb, or by pairs of anti-CD2 mAbs, mutation of the NF-kappaB site consistently reduced transcription by 75-90%. Most studies of Jurkat cells have used PHA plus PMA or ionomycin plus PMA to activate the cells. This suggests that studies of tumor cells requiring the use of nonphysiologic activators such as PMA may additionally complicate interpretation of results.

APC activate T cells by presenting antigen in the context of self-MHC molecules and providing costimulatory signals such as those mediated by CD2 and CD28. We compared B cells, bone marrow-derived ``professional'' APC expressing B7, with B7-negative EC, which have been described as ``semiprofessional'' APC for their ability to costimulate IL-2 transcription and secretion from mitogen-activated normal T cells(49, 53) . We have previously shown that EC can stimulate allogenic T cell proliferation (54) and do so because they provide costimulatory signals that result in augmented IL-2 transcription and secretion(34) . EC signal T cells through LFA-3-CD2 and CD59-CD2 interaction and through a second, unidentified pathway(55) . In this study, CD2 was found to be critical in mediating signals that resulted in enhanced IL-2 transcription and secretion when either B cells or EC were used as costimulators. In contrast, the CD28 pathway proved to be critical for B cell costimulation of transcription and IL-2 secretion, but was not productively engaged by EC. Thus, costimulation by two different accessory cells can be distinguished by the surface ligands through which they signal T cells. It is likely that both B cells and EC also signal through other ligands, not addressed in this report. An interesting finding was that transcription induced by B cells or EC was usually of comparable magnitude, whereas secreted IL-2 was usually greater from T cells costimulated by B cells. One explanation for this finding is that B cells do increase transcription beyond that registered by the transfected promoter, but do so through a site outside of the 600 base pairs we used. It is more likely that B cells, probably acting through CD28, are affecting IL-2 levels post-transcriptionally. Indeed, the increased secretion of IL-2 in response to B cell costimulation can be almost completely blocked by CTLA-4-Ig (Fig. 4). It has been reported that CD28 signaling has effects on IL-2 stability as well as on processing of nuclear transcripts and export from the nucleus(19, 20) . A similar mechanism has also been described for regulation of IL-2 transcripts in the absence of CD28 signaling(56) . These effects are likely specific for IL-2 mRNA and presumably would not affect the reporter gene.

A major conclusion of this study is that although different accessory cells costimulate T cells through different surface ligands, the same sites in the IL-2 promoter appear to be targeted. Thus, for both B cell and EC costimulation, the NF-kappaB and pAP-1 sites and, to a lesser extent, the NFAT, NFAP-1, and pOCT sites are critical. This same combination of sites was also important for signaling by pairs of anti-CD2 mAbs. A surprising finding in these studies was the failure of the CD28RE mutation to reduce transcription induced by B cell costimulation, given that the mutation muted the effects of anti-CD28 mAb. T cell CD28 was productively engaged by B cell CD28 ligands in these experiments as CTLA-4-Ig fusion protein blocked augmentation of secreted IL-2. The most likely interpretation is that natural ligands for CD28 may deliver signals that differ from those produced by some anti-CD28 mAbs and that these signals do not induce activation of factors that bind to the CD28RE. Indeed, a recent report suggests that not all signaling through CD28 is identical. Using a panel of anti-CD28 mAbs, Nunès et al.(57) found that whereas a given pair of anti-CD28 mAbs may induce similar calcium fluxes in T cells, they can induce very different levels of IL-2 secretion. The mAbs recognize several different epitopes on CD28, and the implication is that signaling through CD28 (perhaps involving different epitopes) activates more than one signaling pathway. Alternatively, B cells (and potentially EC), unlike single mAbs, provide multiple costimulatory signals that result in expression of functionally redundant sets of transcription factors, obviating the role of factors bound to the CD28RE. This interpretation presupposes that CD28-mediated signals target other sites in addition to the CD28RE. Interestingly, the CD28RE has recently been shown to bind members of the NF-kappaB family of proteins, specifically NFKB1 (p50), RelA (p65) and c-Rel(38) , suggesting that CD28 may also activate the NF-kappaB site. However, in normal T cells, the NF-kappaB site and the CD28RE do not appear to be a functionally redundant pair since mutation of the NF-kappaB site cannot be compensated for by a functional CD28RE.

Although the same combination of IL-2 promoter elements is targeted by different costimulatory molecules, we have not ruled out the possibility that different combinations of nuclear factors may bind to these sites. Indeed, we have previously shown that when T cells are costimulated by EC, they express enhanced levels of c-Fos mRNA, and the AP-1 complex that binds to the pAP-1 site contains severalfold higher levels of Fos protein compared with cells activated in the absence of EC(34) . Interestingly, a c-Fos knockout mouse has recently been generated that displays normal IL-2 induction, suggesting that other Fos proteins can substitute for c-Fos in these mice(58) . There are also multiple NFAT proteins that may have differing roles under different conditions. Thus, it is possible that in response to different accessory cells, sequential expression of nuclear factors, expression of different family members, or expression of factors with longer half-lives, for example, may affect transcription. Indeed, IL-2 mRNA levels remain elevated longer in the presence than in the absence of EC costimulation. (^2)The data presented in this study define the sites most relevant for future study of nuclear factor binding.

In conclusion, our findings suggest that the IL-2 promoter in normal T cells integrates signals by using a combination of several sites to activate transcription. This model is in agreement with a previous proposal describing fine tuning of IL-2 transcription(33) . Furthermore, these studies emphasize the feasibility of working with normal nontransformed cells and the possibility that such cells may differ in significant ways from the tumor cells that have become ``standard'' models for the study of transcriptional regulation.


FOOTNOTES

*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants HL51014 and HL 43364. The Molecular Cardiobiology Program at the Boyer Center for Molecular Medicine is supported by Lederle Laboratories. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Bio Sci II, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA 92717.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: MHC, major histocompatibility complex; APC, antigen-presenting cell(s); TCR, T cell receptor; IL, interleukin; NFAT, nuclear factor of activated T cells; dNFAT, distal NFAT; pNFAT, proximal NFAT; EC, endothelial cell(s); pAP-1, proximal AP-1; CD28RE, CD28 response element; PHA, phytohemagglutinin; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell(s); FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting; mAb, monoclonal antibody; PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; pOCT, proximal octamer.

(^2)
C. C. W. Hughes and J. S. Pober, unpublished observations.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Louise Benson and Gwen Davis for help with cell culture, Tom Taylor for help with FACS, Chris Benjamin for CD2 antibodies, Tim Springer for antibodies, and Gary Gray for CD28 antibodies and fusion proteins.


REFERENCES

  1. Schwartz, R. H. (1985) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 3, 237-261 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Crabtree, G. R. (1989) Science 243, 355-361 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Smith, K. A. (1988) Science 240, 1169-1176 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Schwartz, R. H. (1990) Science 248, 1349-1356 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Hughes, C. C. W., Savage, C. O. S., and Pober, J. S. (1990) J. Exp. Med. 171, 1453-1467 [Abstract]
  6. Damle, N. K., Klussman, K., Linsley, P. S., and Aruffo, A. (1992) J. Immunol. 148, 1985-1992 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Bierer, B. E., Barbosa, J., Herrmann, S., and Burakoff, S. J. (1988) J. Immunol. 140, 3358-3363 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Menu, E., Tsai, B. C., Bothwell, A. L. M., Sims, P. J., and Bierer, B. E. (1994) J. Immunol. 153, 2444-2456 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Young, J. W., Koulova, L., Soergel, S. A., Clark, E. A., Steinman, R. M., and Dupont, B. (1992) J. Clin. Invest. 90, 229-237 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Boussiotis, V. A., Freeman, G. J., Gribben, J. G., Daley, J., Gray, G., and Nadler, L. M. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 11059-11063 [Abstract]
  11. Hathcock, K. S., Laszlo, G., Dickler, H. B., Bradshaw, J., Linsley, P., and Hodes, R. J. (1993) Science 262, 905-907 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Lenschow, D. J., Su, G., Zuckerman, L. A., Nabavi, N., Jellis, C. L., Gray, G. S., Miller, J., and Bluestone, J. A. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 11054-11058 [Abstract]
  13. Freeman, G. J., Gribben, J. G., Boussiotis, V. A., Ng, J. W., Restivo, V. J., Lombard, L. A., Gray, G. S., and Nadler, L. M. (1993) Science 262, 909-911 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Damle, N. K., Klussman, K., Leytze, G., Myrdal, S., Aruffo, A., Ledbetter, J. A., and Linsley, P. S. (1994) J. Immunol. 152, 2686-2697 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Walunas, T. L., Lenschow, D. J., Bakker, C. Y., Linsley, P. S., Freeman, G. F., Green, J. M., Thompson, C. B., and Bluestone, J. A. (1994) Immunity 1, 405-413 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Jenkins, M. (1994) Immunity 1, 443-446 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Johnson, J., and Jenkins, M. K. (1994) J. Immunol. 152, 429-437 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. D'Ambrosio, D., Trotta, R., Vacca, A., Frati, L., Santoni, A., Gulino, A., and Testi, R. (1993) Eur. J. Immunol. 23, 2993-2997 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Umlauf, S. W., Beverly, B., Lantz, O., and Schwartz, R. H. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 3197-3205 [Abstract]
  20. Lindsten, T., June, C. H., Ledbetter, J. A., Stella, G., and Thompson, C. B. (1989) Science 244, 339-343 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Durand, D. B., Shaw, J.-P., Bush, M. R., Replogle, R. E., Belagaje, R., and Crabtree, G. R. (1988) Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 1715-1724 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Novak, T. J., White, P. M., and Rothenberg, E. V. (1990) Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 4523-4533 [Abstract]
  23. McCaffrey, P. G., Luo, C., Kerppola, T. K., Jain, J., Badalian, T. M., Ho, A. M., Burgeon, E., Lane, W. S., Lambert, J. M., Curran, T., Verdine, G. L., Rao, A., and Hogan, P. G. (1993) Science 262, 750-754 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Serfling, E., Barthelmas, R., Pfeuffer, I., Schenk, B., Zarius, S., Swoboda, R., Mercurio, F., and Karin, M. (1989) EMBO J. 8, 465-473 [Abstract]
  25. Boise, L. H., Petryniak, B., Mao, X., June, C. H., Wang, C. Y., Lindsten, T., Bravo, R., Kovary, K., Leiden, J. H., and Thompson, C. B. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 1911-1919 [Abstract]
  26. Jain, J., Valge-Archer, V. E., and Rao, A. (1992) J. Immunol. 148, 1240-1250 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Emmel, E. A., Verweij, C. L., Durand, D. B., Higgins, K. M., Lacy, E., and Crabtree, G. R. (1989) Science 246, 1617-1620 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Hoyos, B., Ballard, D. W., Böhnlein, E., Siekevitz, M., and Greene, W. C. (1989) Science 244, 457-460 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Williams, T. M., Moolten, D., Burlein, J., Romano, J., Bhaerman, R., Godillot, A., Mellon, M., Rauscher, F. J., and Kant, J. A. (1991) Science 254, 1791-1794 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Fraser, J. D., and Weiss, A. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 4357-4363 [Abstract]
  31. Kamps, M. P., Corcoran, L., LeBowitz, J. H., and Baltimore, D. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 5464-5472 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Skerka, C., Decker, E. L., and Zipfel, P. F. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 22500-22506 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Hentsch, B., Mouzaki, A., Pfeuffer, I., Rungger, D., and Serfling, E. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 2657-2665 [Abstract]
  34. Hughes, C. C. W., and Pober, J. S. (1993) J. Immunol. 150, 3148-3160 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Muegge, K., Williams, T. M., Kant, J., Karin, M., Chiu, R., Schmidt, A., Siebenlist, U., Young, H. A., and Durum, S. K. (1989) Science 246, 249-251 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Novak, T. J., Chen, D., and Rothenberg, E. V. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 6325-6334 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Lai, J.-H., Horvath, G., Subleski, J., Bruder, J., Ghosh, P., and Tan, T.-H. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 4260-4271 [Abstract]
  38. Ghosh, P., Tan, T. H., Rice, N. R., Sica, A., and Young, H. A. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 1696-1700 [Abstract]
  39. Fraser, J. D., Irving, B. A., Crabtree, G. R., and Weiss, A. (1991) Science 251, 313-316 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Civil, A., Geerts, M., Aarden, L. A., and Verweij, C. L. (1992) Eur. J. Immunol. 22, 3041-3043 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Kang, S., Tran, A., Grilli, M., and Lenardo, M. J. (1992) Science 256, 1452-1456 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Chrivia, J. C., Wedrychowicz, T., Young, H. A., and Hardy, K. J. (1990) J. Exp. Med. 172, 661-664 [Abstract]
  43. Gimbrone, M. A., Jr. (1976) Prog. Hemostasis Thromb. 3, 1-28 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Thornton, S. C., Mueller, S. N., and Levine, E. M. (1983) Science 222, 623-625 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Higuchi, R. (1990) in PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications (Innis, M. A., Gelfand, D. H., Sninsky, J. J., and White, T. J., eds) pp. 177-183, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA
  46. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  47. Fischer, G. F., Holter, W., Majdic, O., Cragoe, E. J., and Knapp, W. (1988) J. Immunol. 141, 404-409 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Kumagai, N., Benedict, S. H., Mills, G. B., and Gelfand, E. W. (1987) J. Immunol. 139, 1393-1399 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Karmann, K., Pober, J. S., and Hughes, C. C. W. (1994) J. Immunol. 153, 3929-3937 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Shaw, J.-P., Utz, P. J., Durand, D. B., Toole, J. J., Emmel, E. A., and Crabtree, G. R. (1988) Science 241, 202-205 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  51. Brombacher, F., Schäfer, T., Weissenstein, U., Tschopp, C., Andersen, E., Bürki, K., and Baumann, G. (1994) Int. Immunol. 6, 189-197 [Abstract]
  52. Sha, W. C., Liou, H.-C., Tuomanen, E. I., and Baltimore, D. (1995) Cell 80, 321-330 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  53. Murray, A. G., Khodadoust, M. K., Pober, J. S., and Bothwell, A. L. M. (1994) Immunity 1, 57-63 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  54. Savage, C. O. S., Hughes, C. C. W., McIntyre, B. W., Picard, J. K., and Pober, J. S. (1993) Transplantation (Baltimore) 56, 128-134
  55. Savage, C. O. S., Hughes, C. C. W., Pepinsky, R. B., Wallner, B. P., Freedman, A. S., and Pober, J. S. (1991) Cell. Immunol. 137, 150-163 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. Gerez, L., Arad, G., Efrat, S., Ketzinel, M., and Kaempfer, R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 19569-19575 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Nunès, J., Klasen, S., Ragueneau, M., Pavon, C., Couez, D., Mawas, C., Bagnasco, M., and Olive, D. (1993) Int. Immunol. 5, 311-315 [Abstract]
  58. Jain, J., Nalefski, E. A., McCaffrey, P. G., Johnson, R. S., Spiegelman, B. M., Papaioannou, V., and Rao, A. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 1566-1574 [Abstract]

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.