©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
The Product of the Drosophila Gene, Glued, Is the Functional Homologue of the p150Component of the Vertebrate Dynactin Complex (*)

(Received for publication, March 3, 1995; and in revised form, September 5, 1995)

Clare M. Waterman-Storer (§) Erika L. F. Holzbaur (¶)

From the Department of Animal Biology, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6046

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

p150 is the largest polypeptide in the dynactin complex, a protein heteromultimer that binds to and may mediate the microtubule-based motor cytoplasmic dynein. Cloning of a cDNA encoding p150 from rat revealed 31% amino acid sequence identity with the product of the Drosophila gene, Glued. A dominant Glued mutation results in neuronal disruption; null mutations are lethal. However, the Glued gene product has not been characterized. To determine whether the Glued polypeptide is functionally similar to vertebrate p150, we characterized the Glued protein in the Drosophila S-2 cell line. Antibodies raised against Glued were used to demonstrate that this protein sediments exclusively at 20 S, and associates with microtubules in a salt- and ATP-dependent manner. Immunoprecipitations from S-2 cytosol with the anti-Glued antibody resulted in the co-precipitation of subunits of both cytoplasmic dynein and the dynactin complex. An affinity column with covalently bound Glued protein retained cytoplasmic dynein from S-2 cytosol. Based on these observations, we conclude that Glued is a component of a dynactin complex in Drosophila and binds to cytoplasmic dynein, and therefore the mutant Glued phenotypes can be interpreted as resulting from a disruption in the function of the dynactin complex.


INTRODUCTION

The vertebrate dynactin complex is a 20 S protein heteromultimer that is thought to be involved in mediating intracellular transport by the microtubule-based motor protein, cytoplasmic dynein(1, 2, 3, 4, 6) . The dynactin complex consists of 10 polypeptides, of molecular mass = 150, 135, 62, 50, 45, 42, 37, 32, 27, and 24 kDa(3, 5) . While these polypeptide were originally identified as substoichiometric components of cytoplasmic dynein preparations(7) , it was subsequently found that dynein and the dynactin complex form distinct 20 S complexes in cytosol that were separable by ion exchange chromatography (2) or immunoprecipitation(3) . The demonstration of two distinct complexes made unclear the relationship between dynein and the dynactin complex in processes of intracellular motility. In an in vitro motility assay, although cytoplasmic dynein alone could move microtubules along glass, both complexes were required to move vesicles along microtubules(2) . Also, evidence from genetic studies suggested that the two complexes were involved in similar processes in vivo(8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13) . Furthermore, in vertebrate cells, components of both the dynactin complex and cytoplasmic dynein were found to localize to the same subcellular structures, including the centrosome during interphase, and kinetochores and spindle microtubules during mitosis (2, 3, 14, 15, 16, 17) . The recent demonstration that affinity matrices containing either covalently bound p150, the largest polypeptide in the dynactin complex(2, 3) , or covalently bound dynein intermediate chain are capable of retaining intact cytoplasmic dynein or dynactin complex, respectively(18) , provides a clear demonstration that the two complexes are capable of a direct biochemical interaction.

Several of the component polypeptides of the vertebrate dynactin complex have been characterized. The 45-kDa protein, centractin, shares 50% amino acid sequence identity with skeletal muscle actin, and has been classified as a member of the Arp-1 family of actin-related proteins(3, 15, 19, 20) . There is also 1 mol of conventional actin present per dynactin complex(5, 19) . The 37- and 32-kDa polypeptides of the dynactin complex have been identified by antibody cross-reactivity as the alpha and beta subunits of the F-actin binding protein, capping protein or CapZ(5) . Characterization of rat cDNA clones encoding the 150-kDa polypeptide indicated that this protein shared 31% amino acid sequence identity with the product of the Glued gene of Drosophila melanogaster(21, 22) , and the 150-kDa rat polypeptide was subsequently named p150(3) .

The Drosophila Glued gene has been extensively characterized by traditional genetic approaches. The original dominant Glued mutation, Gl results in abnormal eye formation in heterozygotes, with a reduced number of facets and a smooth shiny surface(23) . These macroscopic aberrations result from gross disruptions of the optic lobe, as well as disorganization of axonal projections between the retinal cells and the medulla neuropil (24) . Homozygotes for Gl as well as null mutants at the Glued locus die by the first instar stage of development (24, 25) . The ability of embryos to survive to this stage is probably due to maternal contribution of Glued transcripts to the zygote(25, 26) . In situ hybridization studies showed that Glued is transcribed in virtually all tissues and at multiple stages of Drosophila development(26) . In addition, mosaic analyses of mutations induced at the Glued locus by somatic recombination showed a failure to recover homozygous cells in heterozygous flies(27) , implying that Glued is essential for the viability of individual cells.

Although Drosophila Glued and rat p150 share significant sequence identity, the homology between them is discontinuous and patchy(21) . Regions of p150 and the Glued polypeptide that share particularly high sequence identity include an N-terminal domain that has recently been shown to mediate the binding of p150 to microtubules (16) and a highly charged C-terminal motif that is involved in the binding of p150 to centractin (16) (Fig. 1). The conservation of these functional domains supports the contention that the two polypeptides may be involved in analogous cellular functions in vertebrates and Drosophila. However, related proteins have been identified that also share extensive sequence identity with the microtubule binding domain of p150, including the human endosome-microtubule linker protein, CLIP-170 (28) and the yeast microtubule binding protein, BIK-1(29) . Glued, p150, and CLIP-170 also share remarkable similarity in predicted secondary structure outside of this domain, including extensive predicted alpha-helices with heptad repeats of hydrophobic amino acids (Fig. 1). Therefore, based on sequence comparisons alone it is unclear whether Glued and p150 polypeptides are related members of a large family of microtubule binding proteins, or if they share a homologous function in the dynactin complexes of Drosophila and rat, respectively.


Figure 1: Schematic comparison of the structural features of rat p150, Drosophila Glued, and human CLIP-170. Hatched areas represent predicted alpha-helix, stippled areas represent the conserved microtubule binding domain common to the three polypeptides(16, 28) , and the black regions represent the putative centractin binding domain(16) . Thick bars above the maps represent the regions of the proteins, expressed as bacterial fusions, that were used both as immunogens for the production of polyclonal antisera as well as for the construction of affinity matrices. The shaded region represents the overlap in amino acids between the constructs used for formation of affinity matrices in the rat and Drosophila systems. This region may represent the minimal dynein intermediate chain binding domain (see ``Discussion''). Thin arrows between proteins represent regions of their amino acid sequences that were aligned and compared by the Lipman-Pearson method, with the percent identity shared between proteins assigned to each region. Predicted amino acid sequences were obtained from published cDNA sequences(21, 22, 28) , and used to predict secondary structure by the Garnier-Robson method.



To date, there has been no biochemical or cell biological characterization of the Glued gene product in Drosophila. Therefore, we sought to determine whether Glued and p150 are members of functionally homologous dynactin complexes. To approach this question, antibodies were raised to recombinant Glued protein and used to examine the biochemical properties and cellular distribution of Glued in the embryonically derived Drosophila Schneider 2 (S-2) cell line(30) . We find that the Glued polypeptide is a member of an oligomeric, microtubule-associated, dynactin complex which localizes to the centrosome of cultured cells. In addition, like p150, we demonstrate that Glued is capable of a direct interaction with Drosophila cytoplasmic dynein in S-2 cell cytosol. The similarity in biochemical behavior and subcellular localization of these two proteins indicates that they are involved in analogous cellular functions, and in turn, that dynactin function is essential for cell viability in Drosophila.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Preparation of Cytosolic Supernatants

S-2 cells, cultured as described(30) , were harvested in mid-log phase, pelleted, rinsed once in PHEM buffer (50 mM PIPES, (^1)50 mM HEPES, 2 mM MgCl(2), 1 mM EGTA, pH 7.0) and homogenized in 1.5 volumes of homogenization buffer (PHEM with 0.25 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml n-tosyl-L-arginine methylester and 1 µg/ml pepstatin A) in a Dounce homogenizer. The homogenate was clarified by centrifugation for 30 min at 45,000 times g in a Ti60 rotor (Beckman) at 4 °C, followed by centrifugation for 60 min at 4 °C in a Ti-60 rotor at 145,000 times g. The resulting cytosolic extract was used fresh for all experiments. For immunoprecipitation experiments, cytosol was prepared in RIPA buffer without SDS (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% deoxycholate), with the protease inhibitors described above. To generate rat brain cytosol, frozen rat brains were homogenized in 1.5 volumes of PHEM buffer with protease inhibitors, and the homogenate was processed similarly.

Sucrose Gradient Fractionation of S-2 Cytosol

A half-milliliter of fresh S-2 cytosol was loaded onto a 12-ml 5-25% linear sucrose density gradient in PHEM buffer or RIPA buffer without SDS and centrifuged at 110,000 times g for 17 h at 4 °C in a Ti SW-41 rotor (Beckman). Gradients were calibrated with catalase (11.3 S), thyroglobulin (19 S), and bovine liver glutamate dehydrogenase (26.6 S) as standards. One milliliter fractions were collected and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting.

Isolation of Microtubule-associated Proteins

ATP was depleted from freshly prepared S-2 or rat brain cytosol by incubation for 15 min at 37 °C with 3 units/ml hexokinase and 50 mM glucose. Microtubules were then assembled in the cytosol by addition of taxol to 40 µM and incubation at 37 °C for 15 min. Exogenous bovine brain microtubules, assembled from DEAE-purified tubulin dimers and stabilized with taxol (31) , were added to the cytosol at a final concentration of 0.5 mg/ml and the incubation continued for 15 min. Microtubules were then pelleted through a 6% sucrose cushion at 65,000 times g in a Ti-60 rotor, washed in PHEM with 40 µM taxol, and extracted in a minimal volume of either 10 mM MgATP or 0.4 M NaCl in PHEM buffer. ATP and NaCl extracts were loaded onto 5-25% linear sucrose density gradients and run as above. Gradient fractions were concentrated by methanol precipitation and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting.

Construction of Glued Affinity Matrix and Affinity Chromatography

A 2.0-kilobase BamHI fragment of the Glued cDNA (kind gift of Dr. A. Garen, Yale University) that codes for amino acids 599-1319 from the C terminus of Glued (Fig. 1) was subcloned into the pET15b bacterial expression vector (Novagen). The protein was expressed in Escherichia coli strain BL-21 (Novagen), and purified by the His-Tag (Novagen) system on a Ni affinity column under denaturing conditions as described by the manufacturer (Qiagen). The purified protein was dialyzed into coupling buffer (0.1 M NaHCO(3), 0.5 M NaCl, pH 8), and bound overnight at 4 °C to CH-activated Sepharose 4B (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.). Following blocking and washing according to manufacturer's specifications (Pharmacia), 0.5 ml of the affinity matrix was packed into a column, equilibrated in PHEM buffer, and the column was loaded with 2 ml of S-2 cytosol. The column was washed with 200 bed volumes of PHEM plus 50 mM NaCl, and eluted with a step gradient of PHEM plus 0.5 M NaCl and then PHEM plus 1.0 M NaCl. The eluates were concentrated by methanol precipitation and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting.

Antibody Production and Immunocytochemistry

The bacterially expressed and purified fragment of the Glued cDNA was used to immunize rabbits. Polyclonal antibodies were affinity purified against the Glued affinity matrix described above. The purified antibodies were eluted from the affinity matrix in 100 mM triethylamine, and transferred into phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, 50 mM NaPO(4), 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) with or without 1% bovine serum albumin by gel filtration over a NAP-10 column (Pharmacia). Affinity purified antibodies were used for all experiments described.

For immunoprecipitation, protein A-agarose beads (Life Technologies, Inc.) were loaded with anti-Glued or anti-p150 antibodies (16) in PBS at 4 °C overnight. Cytosol was pre-cleared by incubation with unloaded protein A beads for 30 min at 4 °C, prior to incubation with antibody-bound beads for 3 h at 4 °C, with agitation. The beads were then rinsed extensively with RIPA buffer without SDS and eluted with sample buffer without beta-mercaptoethanol. Protein eluates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and electroblotted onto Immobilon-P (Millipore). For some immunoprecipitation experiments, Western blots were probed with biotin-LC-hydrazide (Pierce) conjugated primary antibodies followed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin (Pierce) and developed using enhanced chemiluminescense (DuPont) or 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole and H(2)O(2). For all other experiments, Western blots were probed with rabbit primary antibodies followed by goat anti-rabbit IgG and then rabbit peroxidase anti-peroxidase (Jackson Immunologicals) and developed similarly. The anti-centractin antibody has been described previously(18) , and the anti-dynein heavy chain antibody DD1 (17) was the kind gift of Dr. E. Vaisberg.

For immunofluorescent localization of the Glued polypeptide, coverslips of S-2 cells were fixed at -20 °C in methanol with 1 mM EGTA, blocked for at least 1 h in PBS with 10% normal goat serum and 1% bovine serum albumin, and rinsed in PBS with 1% bovine serum albumin. Coverslips were then incubated for 1 h at 37 °C in primary antibody, rinsed in PBS, incubated for 1 h in fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson Immunologicals) that had been preadsorbed against fixed S-2 cells, rinsed, and mounted in Tris-buffered Mowiol 4-88 (Calbiochem) mounting media with 0.5% n-propyl gallate (Kodak) to retard photobleaching. Microtubules were localized with the rat monoclonal anti-yeast tubulin antibody YL1/2 (Serotec) and centrosomes were localized with rabbit anti-Drosophila -tubulin antibody ((32) , the kind gift of Dr. Y. Zheng). Immunofluorescence was performed on a Leica TCS laser scanning confocal microscope equipped with a 100times/1.4 oil objective, a krypton-argon laser and fluorescein and Texas red filters. Contrast enhancement and ``sharpening'' convolutions were applied to images using the Leica software prior to recording on T-MAX 100 film using a Focus Imagecorder Plus (Focus Graphics).


RESULTS

Glued Is a Member of a Microtubule-associated Polypeptide Complex

In order to characterize the biochemical behavior of the Glued protein in Drosophila S-2 cells, we raised polyclonal antibodies to the C-terminal half of the Glued protein, expressed in E. coli. Affinity purified antibodies reacted specifically with a doublet of 150/135 kDa in whole S-2 cell cytosol (Fig. 2). The presence of an immunoreactive doublet of polypeptides of 150 and 135 kDa is also characteristic for p150 isolated from various vertebrate species(2, 3) . As a test for immunologic relatedness between Glued and rat p150, the anti-Glued antibodies were used to probe a 0.4 M NaCl extract of rat brain microtubules, which is highly enriched in p150(21) . The anti-Glued antibody reacted solely with a 150-kDa polypeptide in the rat sample (Fig. 2). The immunoreactive rat polypeptide was identical in mobility to a 150-kDa polypeptide recognized when immunoblots were re-probed when polyclonal antibodies to rat p150(16) (not shown). However, the anti-p150 antibodies did not cross-react with Glued protein in S-2 cytosol.


Figure 2: Cross-reactivity of anti-Glued antibodies with p150 from rat brain microtubule salt extract. Proteins from whole S-2 cell cytosol (lane 1) or rat brain microtubule 0.4 M NaCl extract (lane 2) were resolved by 8% SDS-PAGE and the gel was stained with Coomassie Blue (A) or transferred to Immobilon-P and probed with anti-Drosophila Glued antibodies (B). Molecular mass in kDa is indicated on the left.



Mammalian p150 may be isolated by extraction of rat brain microtubules with either ATP or 0.4 M NaCl (21) . In order to examine the microtubule binding properties of the Glued protein, microtubules were assembled from endogenous tubulin in S-2 cytosol by addition of taxol. Because of the low level of tubulin in S-2 cells as compared to neuronal tissue, excess exogenous taxol-stabilized bovine brain microtubules were also added to the assay. After incubation, the microtubules and associated proteins were isolated by centrifugation, and following a buffer wash, the microtubules were extracted with either 10 mM ATP or 0.4 M NaCl, and the resulting fractions were examined by immunoblot with the anti-Glued antibody (Fig. 3, A and B). The Glued polypeptide was observed to remain soluble in the cytosol until microtubules were assembled, and then to co-sediment with microtubules (Fig. 3, A and B). Extraction of the pellet with either 10 mM MgATP or 0.4 M NaCl released the 150-kDa Glued protein from microtubules into the supernatant. In contrast, most of the 135-kDa Glued polypeptide did not co-sediment with microtubules (Fig. 3B), and therefore very little of the 135-kDa protein was extracted from microtubules by either ATP or salt (Fig. 3B). The ATP- and salt-sensitive microtubule binding of the Glued polypeptide was compared to the behavior of rat brain p150 under similar conditions (Fig. 3, A and B). The p150 polypeptide co-sedimented with microtubules, and was nearly fully released with either ATP or elevated ionic strength, as had been previously noted for the rat protein(7, 21) .


Figure 3: Partitioning of the Drosophila Glued and rat p150 proteins during a microtubule-associated protein preparation from S-2 cells (S-2) or rat brain (Rat). Samples from the preparation were analyzed by 8% SDS-PAGE, electroblotted to Immobilon P, the blot stained with Coomassie Blue (A), destained, and probed with anti-Glued (S-2, B) or anti-p150 antibodies (Rat, B). S-2 cell cytosol was prepared by two successive rounds of centrifugation (45k, 45,000 times g; 145k, 145,000 times g; S, supernatant; P, pellet). ATP was depleted in the cytosol, microtubules were assembled, and exogenous, taxol-stabilized, bovine brain microtubules were added. Microtubules were then sedimented and washed (MT; S, post-microtubule supernatant; P, buffer washed microtubule pellet). The microtubule pellet was then extracted of associated proteins with either 10 mM ATP (ATP; S, ATP extract of microtubules; P, post-ATP extracted pellet) or 0.4 M NaCl (NaCl; S, NaCl extract of microtubules, P, post-NaCl extracted pellet). Rat brain (Rat) was processed similarly, but only the 10 mM ATP (ATP, S and p) and 0.4 M NaCl (NaCl, S and P) extracts of microtubules are shown for comparison. The ATP extract of S-2 microtubules was then sedimented through a 5-25% sucrose gradient and the fractions analyzed by 8% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with anti-Glued antibodies (C). Arrowhead corresponds to the position of a 150-kDa molecular mass marker.



The ATP eluate of microtubules from S-2 cell extracts was further fractionated on 5-25% linear sucrose density gradients. Immunoblots of the gradient fractions indicated that Glued sedimented at 20 S (Fig. 3C). This result suggests that microtubule-associated Glued polypeptide is part of a large protein complex. To determine whether the Glued polypeptide exists in S-2 cytosol exclusively as a component of a macromolecular complex, whole cytosol was fractionated on a 5-25% sucrose density gradient. Analysis of gradient fractions by immunoblotting revealed that both the 150- and 135-kDa Glued polypeptides sedimented solely as a peak at 20 S (Fig. 4). The absence of detectable immunoreactivity at a lower sedimentation coefficient suggests that there is not a significant fraction of free Glued subunits in S-2 cytosol.


Figure 4: Sedimentation behavior of the Glued polypeptide in S-2 cell cytosol. Whole S-2 cell cytosol was subjected to centrifugation through a 5-25% sucrose density gradient, and the gradient fractions analyzed by 8% SDS-PAGE, electroblotted to Immobilon-P, and the blot Stained with Coomassie Blue (A). The blot was destained and probed with anti-Glued antibodies (B). Gradients were calibrated with catalase (11.3 S), thyroglobulin (19 S), and glutamate dehydrogenase (26.6 S) as standards, and molecular mass in kDa is indicated on the left.



To further examine the native protein interactions of the Glued polypeptide, immunoprecipitations from S-2 cytosol were performed under nondenaturing conditions. Anti-Glued antibodies were observed to precipitate proteins of 150, 143, 135, 72, and 45 kDa (Fig. 5). This was compared to immunoprecipitations from rat brain cytosol performed in parallel with anti-rat p150 antibodies, which precipitated detectable polypeptides of 150, 135, and 45 kDa as assayed by Coomassie staining. Western analysis of the S-2 cell immunoprecipitate demonstrated that the 150/143/135-kDa triplet was reactive with anti-Glued antibodies, while in the immunoprecipitate from rat brain, the 150/135-kDa polypeptides reacted with anti-p150 antibodies. Antibodies to Dictyostelium cytoplasmic dynein (17) and human centractin (18) reacted weakly with bands of >300-kDa and 45-kDa polypeptides in the Drosophila immunoprecipitate, respectively (not shown), while the 45-kDa rat protein also reacted with anti-centractin antibodies (not shown).


Figure 5: Comparison of native immunoprecipitations with either anti-Glued or anti-p150 antibodies. Protein A beads were loaded with either anti-Glued (lanes 1) or anti-p150 (lanes 2) antibodies and used to immunoprecipitate proteins from S-2 or rat cytosol, respectively. The immunoprecipitate was analyzed by 8% SDS-PAGE and the gel stained with Coomassie Blue (C.B.), or electroblotted to Immobilon-P and probed with biotinylated anti-Drosophila Glued (anti-Glued) or anti-p150 antibodies. The 66-kDa band in the rat immunoprecipitates is bovine serum albumin, which was added to the antibodies to stabilize them during affinity purification, and the prominent 50-kDa band in both immunoprecipitates is the IgG heavy chain. Molecular mass in kDa is indicated on the left.



Glued Interacts Directly with Cytoplasmic Dynein

We have recently demonstrated using proteins isolated from rat, that a biochemical interaction between the dynactin complex and cytoplasmin dynein is mediated by direct binding of p150 to the dynein intermediate chain(18) . In that study, an affinity column with a fragment of rat p150 polypeptide covalently bound to an inert matrix was capable of specifically retaining intact cytoplasmic dynein from whole brain cytosol. Also, an affinity column with bound rat dynein intermediate chain was found to retain the dynactin complex. To determine if the Glued protein from Drosophila was capable of a similar interaction, a Glued affinity column was tested for its ability to retain cytoplasmic dynein from S-2 cytosol. To form the affinity matrix, a 2.1-kilobase pair fragment of the Glued cDNA that encoded amino acids 599-1319 of the Glued polypeptide was expressed in E. coli, purified, and covalently bound to Sepharose beads. When S-2 cytosol was passed over the matrix, several polypeptides were specifically retained through extensive washing, and eluted with 0.5 M NaCl and 1.0 M NaCl (Fig. 6). Prominent bands noted in the eluate were of >300 and 72 kDa, similar in molecular mass to the >300 kDa heavy chain and 74 kDa intermediate chain of rat cytoplasmic dynein(7) . The identity of the >300 kDa protein as dynein heavy chain was confirmed by immunoblot with anti-cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain antibodies(17) . Available antibodies to the dynein intermediate chain did not cross-react with Drosophila proteins. A prominent band at 55 kDa was seen in the eluate of the Glued affinity column, as well as in control columns with covalently bound bovine serum albumin (not shown). The 55-kDa protein was identified by Western blot as tubulin. Because the affinity chromatography was performed at 21 °C, it is likely that under these conditions tubulin polymerizes in the cytosol, and we speculate that due to their length, the polymerized microtubules become nonspecifically trapped in the affinity matrix.


Figure 6: Chromatography using a Glued protein affinity matrix. A bacterially expressed fragment from the C terminus of Glued was covalently linked to Sepharose beads to construct the affinity matrix. S-2 cytosol was prepared (Cytosol, lanes 1 in A and B)) and loaded onto a 0.5-ml bed volume Glued affinity column. The flow-through was collected (Flow, lanes 2 in A and B), and the column washed extensively with PHEM buffer plus 50 mM NaCl, and the final 1.5 ml of the wash collected (Wash, lanes 3 in A and B). The column was then eluted with 0.5 M NaCl (0.5M, lanes 4 in A and B) and then 1.0 M NaCl (1.0M, lanes 5 in A and B). The eluates were concentrated by methanol precipitation and analyzed by 8% SDS-PAGE, transferred to Immobilon-P, stained with Coomassie Blue (A) and then probed with antibodies to dynein heavy chain (B, anti-DHC). The anti-dynein heavy chain antibody had only a low level of reactivity with Drosophila cytoplasmic dynein, and thus dynein in whole cytosol (lanes 1) was not detectable. Molecular mass in kDa is indicated on the left.



Glued Localizes to the Centrosome of S-2 Cells

In various types of cultured vertebrate cells, p150 displays centrosomal and punctate cytoplasmic staining in interphase cells(2, 3, 16) , while it is localized to the spindle poles, kinetochore fibers and kinetochores during mitosis(2, 14) . To determine if the Glued protein is localized to similar structures in S-2 cells, its distribution was examined by indirect immunofluorescence. Methanol-fixed S-2 cells labeled with anti-Glued antibodies revealed a punctate cytoplasmic distribution of the Glued protein with one or more bright spots adjacent to the nucleus (Fig. 7A). In addition, Glued was localized to the spindles of mitotic S-2 cells (Fig. 7, C and D) that had been double labeled with anti-Glued and anti-tubulin antibodies. When the distribution of Glued was compared to that of Drosophila -tubulin(32) , an integral component of the centrosome, both proteins localized primarily to perinuclear spots (Fig. 7B). The observation that the anti--tubulin antibody labeled more than one perinuclear spot per cell suggests that multiple centrosomes may be common in S-2 cells. Apparent co-localization of -tubulin and Glued was observed, but could not be confirmed directly as both primary antibodies had been raised in rabbit. Staining with secondary antibodies alone produced a continuous, low level of background fluorescence throughout the nucleus and cytoplasm of S-2 cells (not shown).


Figure 7: Indirect immunofluorescence localization of Glued in S-2 cells. The distribution of Glued protein in interphase S-2 cells is shown in A, while anti--tubulin (32) is localized in a similar population of cells in B. In C and D, a metaphase S-2 cell was double-labeled with antibodies to tubulin to localize microtubules (C) and anti-Glued antibodies (D).




DISCUSSION

We have examined the immunocytochemical and biochemical behaviors of the Glued protein in the embryonically derived S-2 cell line from Drosophila. The results of these studies indicate that Drosophila Glued and mammalian p150 are functionally homologous members of a dynactin complex and that each interacts directly with the microtubule-based motor protein, cytoplasmic dynein. Immunocytochemical evidence for the similarity between the two polypeptides was demonstrated by inter-species antibody cross-reactivity, as well as similar subcellular localization patterns. Polyclonal antibodies raised to the C-terminal region of the Glued protein react with rat p150. This indicates that the two share epitopes in regions that are only 24% identical at the primary sequence level (see Fig. 1) and that higher order structure may be conserved between Glued and p150.

In biochemical assays, we have observed that like rat p150, Drosophila Glued is a microtubule binding protein that can be extracted from microtubules with either ATP or elevated ionic strength, and that both proteins exist exclusively as members of multimeric 20 S complexes in their respective species. This distinguishes Glued from the related microtubule binding protein, CLIP-170, which exists in cytosol as a dimer, with a sedimentation coefficient of 5.7 S(28) . The data presented here also demonstrates that there are functionally distinct isoforms of this polypeptide in Drosophila. We noted that it was primarily the 150-kDa form of the Glued protein that associated with microtubules, while the 135-kDa form did not. Based on observations made on the p150 and p135 isoforms expressed in human neurons, we speculate that p135 in Drosophila is an alternatively spliced isoform lacking the microtubule-binding motif (^2)that we previously characterized in the rat p150 polypeptide(16) .

In addition to its ability to associate with microtubules, the Glued polypeptide was also found to be capable of binding to intact cytoplasmic dynein complex from S-2 cytosol. This was demonstrated by the specific retention of cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain, as well as several polypeptides similar in molecular mass to vertebrate cytoplasmic dynein subunits, by an affinity matrix constructed of a bacterially expressed fragment of the Glued polypeptide. This result provides further insight into the recent observation of a genetic interaction between Dhc64C, the gene encoding cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain, and Glued(44) in Drosophila, in that it demonstrates a biochemical interaction between the two gene products.

We have recently used a similar method to demonstrate in rat that the interaction between the dynactin complex and cytoplasmic dynein is mediated by direct binding of p150 to the 74-kDa dynein intermediate chain(18) . In that study, we showed that the 766 amino acids spanning the predicted extended alpha-helix (amino acids 133-899) of p150 (see Fig. 1) were sufficient for mediating the interaction with cytoplasmic dynein(18) . In the present study, the Glued affinity matrix was made with a 720-amino acid C-terminal fragment (amino acids 599-1319, see Fig. 1) of the Glued protein. This suggests that the minimal dynein intermediate chain binding domain may be represented by the overlap, amino acids 599-899, in the constructs used in the respective binding experiments in the rat and Drosophila systems.

Immunoprecipitations performed under nondenaturing conditions with the anti-Glued antibody were used to further characterize the polypeptides that interact with Glued in the Drosophila 20 S complex. In this experiment we observed the co-immunoprecipitation of polypeptides of 150, 143, and 135 kDa, which reacted with our anti-Glued antibody. The 143-kDa form of Glued may represent a differentially phosphorylated form of the protein or a proteolytic fragment of the 150-kDa protein. That this form was found only in the immunoprecipitation experiments may be due the use of a different buffer system than was utilized for the rest of the experiments in this study. The 45-kDa protein that was observed in the anti-Glued immunoprecipitate is likely to be the Drosophila centractin homolog, 87c, as described by Fyrberg et al.(33) . The identity of the 45-kDa protein is substantiated by its weak cross-reactivity with an anti-human centractin antibody. We also noted that dynein heavy chain was present in the anti-Glued immunoprecipitate, and this was most likely mediated by the Glued-cytoplasmic dynein interaction demonstrated more directly by affinity chromatography. While co-precipitation of dynein and the dynactin complex was not observed in the parallel immunoprecipitation experiment in rat brain, the anti-rat p150 antibody used in this experiment was raised to the middle third (amino acids 133-899) of the p150 protein(16) . We have preliminary results indicating that this antibody specifically blocks the dynein-dynactin complex interaction, (^3)thus it is probable that the antibody would also block the co-immunoprecipitation of the two complexes.

The demonstration that the product of the Drosophila gene Glued is functionally homologous to the vertebrate p150 polypeptide is significant, because the well characterized mutations at the Glued locus may now be considered as resulting from a disruption in dynactin complex function. As the null mutation is lethal(25) , this indicates that expression of the dynactin complex is required, and that the complex plays an essential role in higher eukaryotes. This is in marked contrast to the recent observations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Neurospora crassa, in which disruption of dynactin complex function resulted in nonlethal phenotypes(10, 11, 12) . In yeast, mutations in either dynein heavy chain or Arp1 (centractin) resulted in the mis-segregation of duplicated nuclei between mother and bud(8, 9, 10, 11) , while in filamentous fungi, disruption of either dynein or dynactin complex results in the block of nuclear migration along the hyphae(12, 13) .

In higher eukaryotes, however, disruption of dynactin complex function has more severe consequences. The principal phenotype of adult heterozygote mutants of the dominant Gl^1 allele are disruptions in neuronal systems such as the optic lobe and eye(24) . There is a body of evidence from biochemical and cell biological studies that both p150 and cytoplasmic dynein play a role in basic neuronal function. Both of these polypeptide complexes are highly enriched in brain tissue from a variety of sources. In rat, in situ hybridization studies have shown that the p150 component of the dynactin complex is expressed at high levels in developing brain and eye tissues (34) , while in Drosophila embryos, cytoplasmic dynein is concentrated in the developing nervous system(35) .

In the neuron, cytoplasmic dynein is a microtubule-based motor molecule that is believed to participate in the retrograde transport of organelles in the axon(36, 37, 38) , and the dynactin complex may mediate this process. The involvement of the dynactin complex in axonal transport is supported by our recent observations that p150 is localized along the length of axonal processes in cultured human neuronal cells.^1 Thus, it may be that the defects in optic neuronal architecture and the aberrant cell patterning observed in Glued mutants (24) are the result of a defect in retrograde transport along the axon. Growth factors required for the survival of neurons (39) are transported from the growth cone to the cell body by fast retrograde transport(40) . Disruption of growth factor transport may be the direct cause of aberrant neuronal outgrowth observed in the Gl^1 mutant.

In addition to the strong evidence for the involvement of Glued in neuronal function, the cell lethal phenotype of Gl^1 homozygotes observed in mosaic analyses (27) , as well as the lethality of the null mutation at this locus (24, 25) suggest that the Glued gene product is also required for an essential function in non-neuronal cells. There is mounting evidence from a variety of species that cytoplasmic dynein participates in some aspect of mitosis, such as spindle assembly, nuclear migration, or chromosome-to-pole motility(8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 41) . It is therefore likely that the dynactin complex is also involved in cell division. This is supported by the observations in Drosophila that cytoplasmic dynein in somatic cells (35) and oocytes(42) , as well as Glued in S-2 cells (this study), all localize to spindle poles and kinetochore microtubules during mitosis.

The demonstration of a Drosophila dynactin complex also sheds light on the molecular mechanisms of the Glued mutations. Genetic analyses of Glued strongly suggests that certain mutations affect the ability of the gene product to participate in protein-protein interactions as a member of an oligomeric complex (27) . The original dominant negative Gl^1 mutation arises from the insertion of a B104 transposon into the coding region of the gene, resulting in a truncated protein in which native sequence is substituted by transposon-coded sequence at the C terminus of Glued(43) . This results in the truncation of a highly conserved motif in Glued which has been implicated in centractin binding(16) . Thus, the protein product of Gl^1 may be unable to form dynactin complexes due to an inability to bind to centractin. However, cellular transfections with similar truncations of p150 did not produce a dominant negative phenotype (16) , and so the substitution of native sequence by transposon-coded sequence in Gl^1 may be responsible for disrupting dynactin complexes, or may produce poisoned complexes that are unable to interact with either cytoplasmic dynein or microtubules. Our demonstration of a dynactin complex in Drosophila will now allow the targeted analysis of the function of the dynactin complex at the level of the organism as well as during development.


FOOTNOTES

*
This work was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health and the Muscular Dystrophy Association (to E. L. F. H.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
Supported by predoctoral fellowships from the American Heart Association and Pennsylvania Muscle Institute Grant NIH T32-AR07584-01.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Animal Biology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3800 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA 19104-6046. Tel.: 215-573-3257; Fax: 215-898-9923.

(^2)
M. K. Tokito, D. S. Howland, V. M.-Y. Lee, and E. L. F. Holzbaur, manuscript submitted.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: PIPES, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.

(^3)
C. M. Waterman-Storer, S. Kuznetsov, S. Karki, D. G. Weiss, G. M. Langford, and E. L. F. Holzbaur, manuscript submitted.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank R. Finklestein for S-2 cells and helpful advice, L. Peachy for use of the TCS confocal, E. P-A. Holleran and S. Karki for critical reading of the manuscript, and M. Tokito for expert technical assistance. Taxol was the gift of the Drug Synthesis and Chemistry branch of the National Cancer Institute.


REFERENCES

  1. Schroer, T. A., and Sheetz, M. P. (1991) J. Cell Biol. 115, 1309-1318 [Abstract]
  2. Gill, S. R., Schroer, T. A., Szilak, I., Steuer, E. R., Sheetz, M. P., and Cleveland, D. W. (1991) J. Cell Biol. 115, 1639-1650 [Abstract]
  3. Paschal, B. M., Holzbaur, E. L. F., Pfister, K. K., Clark, S., Meyer, D., and Vallee, R. B. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 15318-15323 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Allan, V. (1994) Curr. Biol. 4, 1-3 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Schafer, D. A., Gill, S. R., Cooper, J. A., Heuser, J. E., and Schroer, T. A. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 126, 403-412 [Abstract]
  6. Paschal, B. M., and Vallee, R. B. (1987) Nature 330, 181-183 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Collins, C. A., and Vallee, R. B. (1989) Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 14, 491-500 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Li, Y.-Y., Yeh, E., Hays, T., and Bloom, K. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 10096-10100 [Abstract]
  9. Eshel, D., Urrestarauzu, L. A., Vissers, S., Jauniaux, J.-C., van Vliet- Reedijk, J. C., Planta, R. J., and Gibbons, I. R. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 11172-11176 [Abstract]
  10. Clark, S. W., and Meyer, D. I. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 127, 129-138 [Abstract]
  11. Muhua, L., Karpova, T. S., and Cooper, J. A. (1994) Cell 78, 669-679 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Plamann, M., Minke, P. F., Tinsley, J. H., and Bruno, K. S. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 127, 139-149 [Abstract]
  13. Xiang, X., Beckwith, S. M., and Morris, N. R. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 2100-2104 [Abstract]
  14. Steuer, E., Wordeman, L., Schroer, T. A., and Sheetz, M. P. (1990) Nature 345, 266-268 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Clark, S. W., and Meyer, D. I. (1992) Nature 359, 246-250 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Waterman-Storer, C. M., Karki, S., and Holzbaur, E. L. F. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 1634-1638 [Abstract]
  17. Vaisberg, E. A., Koonce, M. P., and McIntosh, J. R. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 123, 849-58 [Abstract]
  18. Karki, S., and Holzbaur, E. L. F. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 28806-28811 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Lees-Miller, J. P., Helfman, D. M., and Schroer, T. A. (1992) Nature 359, 244-246 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Schroer, T. A., Fyrberg, E., Cooper, J. A., Waterson, R. H., Helfman, D., Pollard, T. D., and Meyer, D. I. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 127, 1777-1778 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Holzbaur, E. L. F., Hammerback, J. A., Paschal, B. M., Kravit, N. G., Pfister, K. K., and Vallee, R. B. (1991) Nature 351, 579-583 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Swaroop, A., Swaroop, M., and Garen, A. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 6501-6505 [Abstract]
  23. Plough, H. H., and Ives, P. T. (1935) Genetics 20, 42-69 [Free Full Text]
  24. Harte, P. J., and Kankle, D. R. (1983) Dev. Biol. 99, 88-102 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Garen, A., Miller, B. R., and Paco-Larsen, M. L. (1984) Genetics 107, 645-655 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Swaroop, A., Sun, J.-W., Paco-Larson, M. L., and Garen, A. (1986) Mol. Cell. Biol. 6, 833-841 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Harte, P. J., and Kankel, D. R. (1982) Genetics 101, 477-501 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Pierre, P., Scheel, J., Rickard, J. E., and Kreis, T. E. (1992) Cell 70, 887-900 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Berlin, V., Styles, C. A., and Fink, G. R. (1990) J. Cell Biol. 111, 2573-86 [Abstract]
  30. Schneider, I. (1972) J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 27, 353-365 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Vallee, R. B. (1982) J. Cell Biol. 92, 435-442 [Abstract]
  32. Zheng, Y., Jung, M. K., and Oakley, B. R. (1991) Cell 65, 817-823 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Fyrberg, C., Ryan, L., Kenton, M., and Fyrberg, E. (1994) J. Mol. Biol. 241, 498-503 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Melloni, R. H., Tokito, M. K., and Holzbaur, E. L. F. (1995) J. Comp. Neurol. 357, 15-24 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Hays, T. S., Porter, M. E., McGrail, M., Grissom, P., Gosch, P., Fuller, M. T., and McIntosh, J. R. (1994) J. Cell Sci. 107, 1557-1569 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Schnapp, B. J., and Reese, T. S. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 1548-1552 [Abstract]
  37. Gilbert, S. P., and Sloboda, R. D. (1989) J. Cell Biol. 109, 2379-2394 [Abstract]
  38. Hirokawa, N., Sato-Yoshitake, R., Yoshida, T., and Kawashima, T. (1990) J. Cell Biol. 111, 1027-1037 [Abstract]
  39. Campenot, R. B. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 74, 4516-4519 [Abstract]
  40. Hendry, I. A., Stoeckel, K., Thoenen, H., and Iverson, L. L. (1974) Brain Res. 68, 103-121 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Pfarr, C. M., Coue, M., Grisson, P. M., Hays, T. S., Porter, M. E., and McIntosh, J. R. (1990) Nature 345, 263-265 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Li, M. G., McGrail, M., Serr, M., and Hayes, T. S. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 126, 1475-1494 [Abstract]
  43. Swaroop, A., Paco-Larson, L., and Garen, A. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 1751-1755 [Abstract]
  44. McGrail, M., Gepner, J., Li, M.-G., Ludman, S., Boylan, K., Iyadurai, S., and Hays, T. S. (1994) Mol. Biol. Cell 5, 760 (abstr.)

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.