©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Arabidopsis thaliana Contains Two Differentially Expressed Farnesyl-Diphosphate Synthase Genes (*)

(Received for publication, January 3, 1996)

Núria Cunillera (1)(§) Montserrat Arró (1) Didier Delourme (2)(¶) Francis Karst (2) Albert Boronat (3) Albert Ferrer (1)(**)

From the  (1)Unitat de Bioquímica, Facultat de Farmàcia, Universitat de Barcelona, Avda. Diagonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain, the (2)Laboratoire de Génétique Physiologique et Moléculaire, Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et d'Ingénierie Génétique, Université de Poitiers, 40 Avenue du recteur Pineau, 86022 Poitiers Cedex, France, and the (3)Departament de Bioquímica i Biologia Molecular, Facultat de Química, Universitat de Barcelona, Martí i Franquès 1, 08028 Barcelona, Spain

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

The enzyme farnesyl-diphosphate synthase (FPS; EC 2.5.1.1/EC 2.5.1.10) catalyzes the synthesis of farnesyl diphosphate (FPP) from isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP) and dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP). This reaction is considered to be a rate-limiting step in isoprenoid biosynthesis. Southern blot analysis indicates that Arabidopsis thaliana contains at least 2 genes (FPS1 and FPS2) encoding FPS. The FPS1 and FPS2 genes have been cloned and characterized. The two genes have a very similar organization with regard to intron positions and exon sizes and share a high level of sequence similarity, not only in the coding region but also in the intronic sequences. Northern blot analysis showed that FPS1 and FPS2 have a different pattern of expression. FPS1 mRNA accumulates preferentially in roots and inflorescences, whereas FPS2 mRNA is predominantly expressed in inflorescences. The cDNA corresponding to the FPS1 gene was isolated by functional complementation of a mutant yeast strain deffective in FPS activity (Delourme, D., Lacroute, F., and Karst, F.(1994) Plant Mol. Biol. 26, 1867-1873). By using a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction strategy we have cloned the cDNA corresponding to the FPS2 gene. Analysis of the FPS2 cDNA sequence revealed an open reading frame encoding a protein of 342 amino acid residues with a predicted molecular mass of 39,825 Da. FPS1 and FPS2 isoforms share an overall amino acid identity of 90.6%. Arabidopsis FPS2 was able to rescue the lethal phenotype of an ERG20-disrupted yeast strain. We demonstrate that FPS2 catalyzes the two successive condensations of IPP with both DMAPP and geranyl diphosphate leading to FPP. The significance of the occurrence of different FPS isoforms in plants is discussed in the context of the complex organization of the plant isoprenoid pathway.


INTRODUCTION

Higher plants synthesize a great variety of isoprenoid products that are required not only for their normal growth and development, but also for their adaptative responses to environmental challenges(1) . Plant isoprenoid biosynthesis involves a complex multibranched pathway. The ramifications leading to the specific isoprenoid products emerge from a central pathway in which acetyl-CoA is converted, via mevalonic acid and isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP), (^1)to a series of prenyl diphosphates of increasing size. These polyprenyl diphosphates serve as donors or intermediates in the synthesis of the wide range of isoprenoid end products(1, 2) . It is generally accepted that this metabolic pathway must be stringently regulated to maintain the appropriate cellular balance of isoprenoids under changing physiological conditions. In spite of this, the major rate-limiting steps in the pathway have not yet been clearly identified. It is likely that the enzyme 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase, which catalyzes the synthesis of mevalonic acid, plays a relevant role in the overall control of the isoprenoid biosynthetic pathway(3, 4, 5, 6, 7) . However, there is also general agreement that additional key enzymes are involved in the control of the pathway to ensure the synthesis of the necessary isoprenoid compounds required for many different purposes in different parts of the plant at different stages of growth and development(1) .

Farnesyl-diphosphate (FPP) synthase (FPS; EC 2.5.1.1./EC 2.5.1.10) catalyzes the sequential 1`-4 condensation of two molecules of IPP with both dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP) and the resultant 10-carbon compound geranyl diphosphate (GPP), to produce the 15-carbon compound FPP(8) . In plants, FPP serves as a substrate for the first committed reactions of several branched pathways leading to the synthesis of compounds that are required for growth and development, such as phytosterols (membrane structure and function), dolichols (glycoprotein synthesis), ubiquinones, and heme a (electron transport), abscisic acid (growth regulator), or sesquiterpenoid phytoalexins (defense against pathogen attack). FPP is also a prenyl donor in protein prenylation, a mechanism that promotes membrane interactions and biological activities of a variety of cellular proteins involved in signal transduction, membrane biogenesis, and cell growth control(9, 10) . Therefore, changes in FPS activity could alter the flux of isoprenoid compounds down the various branches of the pathway and, hence, play a central role in the regulation of a number of essential functions in plant cells. The role of FPS in the control of the plant isoprenoid pathway is further supported by the observation that in mammals FPS is a regulated enzyme known to have an important role in the overall control of the sterol biosynthetic pathway(11, 12, 13, 14) .

Plant FPS has been purified and characterized from different species (1, 15, 16) and, recently, cDNA sequences encoding this enzyme have been cloned from Arabidopsis thaliana(17) and Lupinus albus(18, 19) . Comparison of the amino acid sequences of FPS from a variety of organisms, ranging from bacteria to higher eukaryotes, has shown that all the FPS known so far contain five distinct regions with high similarity at the amino acid level(19, 20) . These regions are also conserved in other prenyltransferases, including geranylgeranyl-(C), hexaprenyl-(C), and heptaprenyl-(C) diphosphate synthases(20, 21) . Two of these regions are the aspartate-rich domains that have been shown to play a role in the catalytic reactions of the enzyme, most likely acting as binding sites for the metal ion-complexed pyrophosphate moieties of IPP and the allylic substrates(22, 23) .

As a first step toward a better understanding of the role of FPS in the biosynthesis of isoprenoids in plants, we have undertaken the characterization of the genes encoding Arabidopsis FPS. In this paper we report the isolation and characterization of the Arabidopsis FPS1 and FPS2 genes. The FPS1 gene encodes the FPS isoform previously described(17) . We have also isolated the cDNA corresponding to the FPS2 gene and shown that it encodes a functional FPS.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Enzymes and Biochemicals

Restriction endonucleases and DNA modifying enzymes were purchased from Boehringer Mannheim and Promega. [alpha-P]dCTP (3000 Ci/mmol), [S]Met (1000 Ci/mmol), and [^14C]IPP (58.4 mCi/mmol) were obtained from Amersham. Amino acids, ergosterol, geraniol, geranylgeraniol, farnesol, and Tergitol Nonidet P-40 were from Sigma. Yeast extract, bactopeptone, bactotryptone, and yeast nitrogen base without amino acids and (NH(4))(2)SO(4) were from Difco Laboratories. All other chemicals were of the highest commercial grade available.

Plant Material

A. thaliana plants (ecotype Columbia) were grown under a 16-h light/8-h dark illumination regime at 22 °C on a perlite/vermiculite/sphagnum (1:1:1) mixture irrigated with mineral nutrients(24) . Axenic cultures were prepared by surface-sterilizing seeds in 5% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite and germination on Petri dishes containing mineral medium supplemented with 1% (w/v) sucrose and 0.8% (w/v) agar. Roots were obtained from 3-week-old plants grown on filter papers (mineral medium supplemented with 1% (w/v) sucrose and 2% (w/v) agar).

Strains, Media and Plasmids

Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains used in this work derived from the wild type strain FL100 (ATCC28383, MAT a). The following yeast strains were used: CC25 (MAT a, erg12-2, erg20-2, ura3-1, trp1-1)(25) , LB311 (erg20::URA3/ERG20, ura3-1/ura3-1, trp1-1/trp1-1)(26) , and NC1 (MAT a, erg20::URA3, ura3-1, trp1-1 [pNCFPS2]) (this study). The strain NC1 is a haploid Ura, Trp segregant, isolated from diploid strain LB311 transformed by plasmid pNCFPS2 carrying the Arabidopsis FPS2 cDNA and the selectable marker TRP1. Escherichia coli strain XL1-Blue (F`(proAB lacI^qZDelta M15, Tn10 (tet^r)) recA1 gyrA96 thi-1 hsdR17 supE44 relA1 lac) (Stratagene) was used for cloning, maintenance, and propagation of plasmids.

Yeast strains were grown in YPD medium (1% (w/v) yeast extract, 2% (w/v) bactopeptone, and 2% (w/v) glucose) or minimal medium (0.16% (w/v) yeast nitrogen base without amino acids and (NH(4))(2)SO(4), 0.5% (w/v) (NH(4))(2)SO(4), and 1% (w/v) glucose). Unless otherwise stated, yeast cells were grown at 28 °C either in liquid culture or on agar plates (media supplemented with 15 g of agar per liter). When required to supplement auxotrophies, uracil (50 µg/ml), tryptophan (50 µg/ml), or ergosterol (4 µg/ml in liquid culture or 80 µg/ml in agar plates) were added to the growth media. Ergosterol was supplied by dilution of a stock solution (4 mg/ml) in a mixture of Tergitol Nonidet P-40, ethanol (1:1). E. coli cells were grown in LB medium (1% (w/v) bactotryptone, 0.5% (w/v) yeast extract, and 5% (w/v) NaCl) with tetracycline (15 µg/ml) and with or without ampicillin (100 µg/ml).

Plasmid pNCFPS2 contains the FPS2 cDNA under the control of the strong yeast phosphoglycerate kinase gene (PGK) promoter. To construct pNCFPS2, a SacII-SacI fragment from plasmid pcNC2 (see below) was blunt ended with the Klenow fragment of deoxyribonuclease I and cloned into pDD62, cleaved with NotI, and blunt ended with the Klenow fragment of deoxyribonuclease I in the presence of deoxynucleotides. The transcription polarity of the insert was examined by restriction analysis. Plasmid pDD62 was derived from plasmid pFL61(27) , and contains the selectable marker TRP1 instead of URA3 in the BglII site. The yeast strains were transformed by the lithium acetate procedure(28) .

Isolation of FPS Genomic Clones

2 times 10^4 recombinant phages of an Arabidopsis EMBL4 genomic library, obtained from Dr. A. Bachmair (Max-Planck Institut für Züchtungsforschung, Köln, Germany), were screened using as a probe a 730-bp EcoRI-PstI cDNA fragment from the recombinant clone pDD71, which contains the Arabidopsis FPS1 cDNA(17) . The probe was P-labeled by random priming (29) with [alpha-P]dCTP using the Random Primers DNA labeling kit (Boehringer Mannheim). Hybridization of replica filters was for 18 h at 65 °C in 6 times SSC (1 times SSC = 0.15 M NaCl and 0.015 M sodium citrate, pH 7.0), 2 times Denhardt's, and 100 µg/ml denatured salmon sperm DNA. Nitrocellulose filters (Millipore) were washed at 45 °C twice in 2 times SSC, 0.1% SDS and twice in 0.2 times SSC, 0.1% SDS. Eleven positive recombinant clones were identified and plaque-purified. The phage DNA of selected clones was isolated and cleaved either with EcoRI or HindIII. The DNA fragments hybridizing to the cDNA probe were subcloned into the appropriate restriction sites of pBluescript (Stratagene) prior to sequencing.

DNA Sequencing

Appropriate restriction fragments were subcloned into pBluescript or pUC19. Both strands of DNA were sequenced by the dideoxynucleotide chain-termination method (30) using an automated fluorescence-based system (Applied Biosystems).

Isolation and Analysis of Nucleic Acids

Genomic DNA from 6-day-old dark-grown Arabidopsis seedlings was prepared as described(31) . Genomic DNA (8 µg) was digested with the indicated restriction enzymes, size-fractionated by electrophoresis in 0.8% (w/v) agarose gels, and blotted to Hybond-C nitrocellulose membranes (Amersham). Hybridization with the indicated P-labeled probes was for 18 h either at 65 °C (high stringency) or at 58 °C (low stringency) in 0.7 M sodium chloride, 40 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.6, 4 mM EDTA, 0.1% (w/v) SDS, 0.2% (w/v) polyvinylpyrrolidone, 0.2% (w/v) Ficoll, 9% (w/v) dextran sulfate, and 200 µg/ml denatured salmon sperm DNA. High stringency washes were performed at 65 °C twice in 1 times SSC, 0.5% SDS, and twice in 0.2 times SSC, 0.5% SDS. Low stringency washes were done twice in 2 times SSC, 0.5% SDS at 58 °C.

Total RNA from different tissues of Arabidopsis was isolated (32) , and poly(A) RNA was obtained by oligo(dT)-cellulose according to the manufacturer's recommendations (Amresco). For Northern analysis, 30 µg of Arabidopsis total RNA from each sample was fractionated by electrophoresis in 1% (w/v) agarose gels containing 2.2 M formaldehyde and blotted to Hybond-N nylon membranes (Amersham). Hybridization with the indicated P-labeled probes was for 18 h at 42 °C in 50% (v/v) formamide, 1 M NaCl, 50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6.5, 7.5 times Denhardt's, 1% SDS, 10% (w/v) dextran sulfate, and 500 µg/ml denatured salmon sperm DNA. Filters were washed twice at room temperature in 2 times SSC, 0.1% SDS and at 40 °C twice in 1 times SSC, 0.1% SDS, once in 0.1 times SSC, 0.1% SDS, and once in 0.1 times SSC. To ascertain that equivalent amounts of RNA were present in each lane, filters were reprobed with a P-labeled 900-bp BamHI-EcoRI fragment of the gene for the 25 S cytoplasmic rRNA. The probe used was obtained from plasmid pTA250 which contains a wheat rRNA gene repeating unit(33) .

Cloning of FPS2 cDNA

The cDNA encoding FPS2 was cloned using a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) strategy devised for the 3`-end amplification of cDNAs(34) . The reverse transcriptase reaction was carried out in a 20-µl reaction mixture containing 5 µg of poly(A) RNA from Arabidopsis inflorescences, 45 pmol of adaptor-(dT) primer (5`-GACTCGAGTCGACATCGGGTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT-3`), 10 mM dithiothreitol, 1.5 mM each dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP, 10 units of RNasin (Promega), first strand synthesis buffer (Life Technologies, Inc.), and 400 units of Moloney murine leukemia virus-reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Inc.). The reaction mixture was incubated for 2 h at 42 °C and rapidly cooled in ice. Two µl of the single-stranded cDNA pool was denatured for 5 min at 95 °C in a 50-µl reaction mixture containing 25 pmol each of an upstream primer specific for the leader region of the FPS2 mRNA (5`-GGTTCCACATTTGGCTTTGCAC-3`, nucleotides -41 to -20 in Fig. 4), and the adaptor oligonucleotide as a downstream primer (5`-GACTCGAGTCGACATCGGG-3`), 1.5 mM MgCl(2), 0.2 mM each dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP, and PCR buffer (Amersham). After cooling to 72 °C, 1 unit of Taq polymerase (Pharmacia) was added and the mixture was annealed for 1 min at 58 °C. The cDNA was amplified by incubation of the mixture for 40 min at 72 °C, followed by 40 cycles of 40 s at 94 °C, 1 min at 58 °C, and 3 min at 72 °C, with a 15-min final extension at 72 °C. The resulting PCR product (approximately 1.3 kilobases) was gel-purified and ligated into plasmid pGEM-T (Promega) prior to sequencing. The resulting plasmid was named pcNC2.


Figure 4: Nucleotide sequence of the Arabidopsis FPS2 cDNA and amino acid alignment of Arabidopsis FPS1 and FPS2. Nucleotides are numbered (right) by assigning position +1 to the first base of the ATG codon. The 5`-end sequence obtained from the RACE clones is shown in italic. A putative polyadenylation signal is double underlined. Stop codons are denoted by an asterisk. Amino acid positions are indicated on the left. Identical residues are represented by dots. The five regions (I to V) that are present in many prenyltransferases are shaded and the amino acid residues within these regions that are present in all the FPS known so far are shown below. Intron positions are indicated by open triangles.



Mapping of the 5`-end of FPS2 mRNA

The 5`-end of the Arabidopsis FPS2 mRNA was determined by the 5` RACE technique using the 5`-Amplifinder RACE kit (Clontech Laboratories). Five µg of poly(A) RNA from Arabidopsis inflorescences was reverse transcribed according to the manufacturer's recommendations, using an antisense gene-specific primer (5`-CCTGTGGATATGATTGCGAAG-3`) complementary to the nucleotide sequence +373 to +393 in the Arabidopsis FPS2 cDNA (Fig. 4). An anchor oligonucleotide (provided in the kit) was then ligated to the 3`-end of the single-stranded cDNA using T4 RNA ligase. The 5`-end of the FPS2 cDNA was amplified by PCR using a forward primer complementary to the anchor oligonucleotide and a reverse nested FPS2-specific primer (5`-GGCTTTCTAAACCAACAAGGCTGG-3`) complementary to the nucleotide sequence +312 to +335 in the Arabidopsis FPS2 cDNA (Fig. 4). PCR was performed under the same conditions described above for 35 cycles of 35 s at 94 °C, 45 s at 60 °C, and 2 min at 72 °C, with a 15-min final extension at 72 °C. The resulting PCR product was gel-purified, digested with EcoRI, and cloned into the corresponding site of plasmid pUC19 prior to sequencing.

In Vitro Transcription/Translation

A SacII-SalI fragment of plasmid pcNC2, containing the FPS2 cDNA, was cloned into the corresponding sites of pBluescript. The resulting plasmid was named pcBNC2. The FPS2 cDNA was cut out as a SacI-SalI fragment from plasmid pcBNC2 and cloned into the corresponding sites of plasmid pSP65 (Promega). The resulting plasmid, pcSPNC2, was used as a template for in vitro transcription/translation using [S]Met and the TNT Coupled Wheat Germ Extract System (Promega), according to the manufacturer. The S-labeled protein was separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (12% acrylamide) and detected by fluorography.

Assay for FPS Activity

Yeast strains were grown in minimal medium containing ergosterol and/or the amino acids required to supplement auxotrophies. The cell-free extracts (105.000 times g) were prepared in 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0(25) , and incubated for 6 min in the presence of 10 µM dimethylaminoethyl diphosphate (35) to inhibit the yeast IPP isomerase activity. The reaction mixture (100 µl), containing 60 µM DMAPP, 11 µM [^14C]IPP, 1 mM MgCl(2), and the 105,000 times g supernatant (100 µg of protein), was incubated at 37 °C for 15 min and rapidly ice-chilled. After the addition of 100 µl of 0.15 M Tris glycine, pH 10.5, the reaction products were enzymatically dephosphorylated by incubation at 37 °C for 30 min in the presence of 0.2 units of calf alkaline phosphatase. The sample was then diluted in 0.6 ml of water and the reaction products were extracted with 1 ml of hexane. The hexane extract was concentrated after addition of geraniol, farnesol, and geranylgeraniol (100 ng each) as carriers, and the reaction products were separated on HPTLC RP-18 plates (Merck), using a mixture of methanol/water (95:5) as solvent. The position of the prenyl alcohols was visualized using iodine vapor. The radioactivity was detected only in the geraniol and farnesol fractions, and was quantified using an Automatic TLC linear analyzer Berthold LB2832.


RESULTS

Isolation and Characterization of Genomic Clones Corresponding to Arabidopsis FPS1 and FPS2 Genes

Southern blot analysis of Arabidopsis genomic DNA digested with different restriction enzymes was performed using as a probe a 340-bp NotI-HindIII cDNA fragment from the recombinant clone pDD71, which contains the Arabidopsis FPS cDNA previously isolated(17) , and herein referred to as FPS1 cDNA. The simple pattern of bands obtained under high stringency hybridization conditions (Fig. 1A) suggested that the fragments detected correspond to the gene that encodes the FPS1 isoform previously reported(17) . This gene is referred to as FPS1 gene. However, additional bands were observed when hybridization was performed using the same probe under low stringency conditions (Fig. 1C). These results indicated that the Arabidopsis genome contains sequences related to the FPS1 gene, thus revealing that in this plant FPS might be encoded by a small gene family.


Figure 1: Southern blot analysis of Arabidopsis FPS genes. Genomic DNA from Arabidopsis (8 µg) was digested with the restriction enzymes indicated at the top, electrophoresed and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. Filters were hybridized with a 340-bp NotI-HindIII cDNA fragment from plasmid pDD71, which contains the cDNA encoding the Arabidopsis FPS1 isoform(17) , under conditions of high (A) and low stringency (C), or a 800-bp XhoI-HindIII fragment from the FPS2 gene, shown in Fig. 2, under conditions of high stringency (B). Numbers on the right indicate the mobility of DNA size standards.




Figure 2: Restriction and structural maps of Arabidopsis FPS1 and FPS2 genomic clones. A, restriction map of the genomic regions containing the FPS1 and FPS2 genes. FPS1 and FPS2 transcription units are represented by solid boxes. The cloned regions contained in recombinant plasmids are indicated below the restriction maps. The 800-bp XhoI-HindIII probe from pgNC102 used in genomic Southern blot analysis is indicated by a double arrowhead line. Restriction sites are as follows: B, BamHI; E, EcoRI; EV, EcoRV; H, HindIII. B, structural organization of the FPS1 and FPS2 genes. Exons are represented by boxes and are numbered from the 5`-end of the genes. Lines between boxes correspond to introns. Coding regions are represented by solid boxes.



To clone the Arabidopsis FPS genes, a 730-bp EcoRI-PstI cDNA fragment from clone pDD71 was used to screen an Arabidopsis genomic library under low stringency conditions. Eleven positive clones were isolated. These clones were classified in two distinct groups since restriction endonuclease mapping and Southern hybridization analyses showed that they contained DNA inserts corresponding to two different genomic regions. Clones gNC10 and gNC24 were selected for further characterization as representatives of each group. Two genomic fragments from each clone hybridizing to the cDNA probe were subcloned. Sequence analysis revealed that plasmids pgNC241 and pgNC242 (Fig. 2A) contained overlapping inserts including the entire coding region of the FPS1 gene as well as 5`- and 3`-flanking regions. Plasmids pgNC101 and pgNC102 (Fig. 2A) contained overlapping fragments with a sequence different although highly similar to that of the FPS1 gene, which corresponds to a second FPS gene (FPS2), as was later verified.

Southern blot analysis of Arabidopsis genomic DNA, performed under high stringency conditions using as a probe a 800-bp XhoI-HindIII fragment from the FPS2 gene (Fig. 2), revealed a simple pattern of bands (Fig. 1B) which accounted for a subset of genomic fragments previously detected at low stringency by the FPS1 probe (Fig. 1C). It was concluded that these fragments derived from the FPS2 gene. Interestingly, the bands specifically detected by the FPS1 and FPS2 probes (Fig. 1, A and B) accounted for most of the bands identified by the FPS1 probe under low stringency conditions (Fig. 1C). However, one additional weakly hybridizing fragment was detected in each lane. Taken together, these results indicated that Arabidopsis contains two genes encoding FPS (FPS1 and FPS2) and a genomic sequence that might correspond to a gene encoding either an additional FPS isoform or a closely related prenyltransferase. The nucleotide sequences of the FPS1 and FPS2 genes (data not shown) have been deposited in the GenBank data base with accession numbers L46367 and L46350, respectively.

The alignment of the nucleotide sequence of the FPS1 gene with that of the FPS1 cDNA showed that the gene consists of 12 exons and 11 introns (Fig. 2B). Comparison of these two sequences revealed several single-base differences. Because of two of these changes, Ser-177 (TCC) and Thr-283 (ACC) in the predicted amino acid sequence of the FPS1 protein previously reported (17) are converted to Ala (GCC) and Pro (CCC), respectively, in the protein encoded by the FPS1 gene. These changes presumably represent DNA polymorphisms associated with the different Arabidopsis ecotypes used. The organization of exons and introns of the FPS2 gene was initially deduced by comparing its sequence with that of the FPS1 gene, and further confirmed after alignment with the sequence of the FPS2 cDNA (see below). The FPS2 gene consists of 11 exons and 10 introns. The two genes have a very similar structure, although it is worth noting that exon 4 in the FPS2 gene corresponds to exons 4 and 5 in the FPS1 gene (Fig. 2B). In both genes, introns are located at equivalent positions relative to the coding sequences. All exon-intron junctions follow the GT/AG rule(36) . The alignment of the sequences of the FPS1 and FPS2 genes revealed that they share a high level of similarity not only in the coding region (87% overall identity) but also in the intronic sequences (identity higher than 57%).

Expression Analysis of FPS1 and FPS2 Genes

Northern blot analysis of total RNA from different Arabidopsis tissues using FPS1 and FPS2 gene-specific probes revealed that each probe detected a transcript of approximately 1.3 kilobases (Fig. 3). The two genes were expressed in all tissues analyzed although they had a different pattern of expression. The highest level of expression of FPS1 mRNA was found in roots and inflorescences whereas FPS2 mRNA was expressed at a lower level and accumulated preferentially in inflorescences. No significant change in the levels of FPS1 or FPS2 mRNA was detected when RNA samples were prepared from light- or dark-grown seedlings (Fig. 3A). Equal amounts of RNA were present in each lane, as confirmed by hybridization of the filters with a fragment of the wheat 25 S rRNA gene (data not shown).


Figure 3: Northern blot analysis of Arabidopsis FPS1 and FPS2 mRNA. A, total RNA samples from different tissues of Arabidopsis (30 µg/lane) was electrophoresed in 1% agarose-formaldehyde gels and transferred onto nylon membranes. Filters were hybridized with the FPS1 and FPS2 gene-specific probes shown in B. Exposure times were 9 days for FPS1 and 21 days for FPS2. B, map of the 3`-region of the FPS1 and FPS2 genes. The last exon of each gene is represented by a box. The 3`-untranslated regions are represented by open boxes. Lines correspond to the genomic regions flanking the 3`-end of the genes. The FPS1 (370-bp BglII-HindIII fragment) and FPS2 (450-bp BglII-KpnI fragment) gene-specific probes are indicated by double arrowhead lines.



Isolation and Characterization of a cDNA Encoding Arabidopsis FPS2

Attempts to isolate cDNA clones corresponding to the FPS2 gene from different Arabidopsis cDNA libraries were unsuccessful. To clone an FPS2 cDNA, a reverse transcription-PCR strategy was developed (for details see ``Experimental Procedures''). A cDNA fragment of approximately 1.3 kilobases, obtained in PCR experiments using poly(A) RNA from Arabidopsis inflorescences, was cloned (pcNC2) and sequenced. The cDNA insert was found to have a nucleotide sequence of 1300 bp (Fig. 4) which, excluding a polyadenylate tail of 39 bases, was identical to the sequence of the predicted exons of the FPS2 gene. Analysis of the cDNA sequence indicated the presence of an open reading frame of 1029 nucleotides encoding a protein of 342 amino acid residues (Fig. 4) with a predicted molecular mass of 39,825 Da. The 5`-proximal ATG triplet has been assumed to be the start codon since according to the ``first-AUG-rule'' it serves as the initiator codon to be used in the translation of about 95% of the eukaryotic mRNAs(37) . This assignment is supported by the observation that the nucleotide sequences surrounding the translation start triplet (ATCAATGGC) fit the consensus reported for functional start codons in plants (AACAATGGC)(38) , except that a T is found at position -3 relative to the ATG codon. The clone also contained a 41-bp non-coding sequence preceding the ATG start codon and a 191-bp 3`-untranslated region, including a consensus polyadenylation motif (AATAAA) located 16 bp upstream of the polyadenylate tail. The 5`-end of the FPS2 mRNA was determined by the RACE technique and found to have 5 additional nucleotides with respect to the FPS2 cDNA (Fig. 4). This additional sequence corresponds exactly with the sequence of the FPS2 gene.

To check the size of the protein encoded by the FPS2 cDNA, the FPS2 transcript was synthesized in vitro from plasmid pcSPNC2 and translated in a wheat germ cell-free system. A single protein migrating with an apparent molecular mass of about 41 kDa was generated from FPS2 mRNA (data not shown). The apparent molecular mass of this protein is in good agreement with the predicted molecular mass of FPS2 (39,825 Da).

The Arabidopsis FPS1 and FPS2 isoforms are composed of 343 and 342 amino acid residues, respectively. The alignment of the amino acid sequence of FPS1 and FPS2 is shown in Fig. 4. The two proteins are highly conserved throughout their sequence, showing an overall amino acid identity of 90.6% and a similarity of 94.5%. Both enzymes contain the five conserved regions, designated I to V (Fig. 4), which appear to be common not only to all the FPS isoforms previously reported (19) but also to other prenyltransferases(20, 21) . Regions II and V correspond to the two aspartate-rich domains that have been shown to be involved in enzyme catalysis(22, 23) .

Confirmation of the FPS Activity of the Arabidopsis FPS2

To check that the Arabidopsis FPS2 cDNA encoded a functional enzyme, the cDNA was expressed in the mutant yeast strain CC25, which is defective in FPS activity. The strain CC25 is a thermosensitive mutant strain that carries the leaky mutation erg20-2 affecting the ability of FPS to catalyze the condensation of GPP with IPP to yield FPP. As a consequence this strain is auxotrophic for ergosterol at a nonpermissive temperature (36 °C) (25) . Strain CC25 was transformed with plasmid pNCFPS2, carrying the Arabidopsis FPS2 cDNA under the control of the PGK promoter. The results, shown in Fig. 5A, demonstrate that plasmid pNCFPS2 complements the ergosterol auxotrophy of strain CC25 at 36 °C. The presence of FPS activity in the transformed yeast mutant was checked by an in vitro assay using cell free extracts obtained from the CC25[pNCFPS2] strain. The major reaction product was found to be FPP (Fig. 5B). In contrast, strain CC25 synthesized GPP as the major product (Fig. 5B).


Figure 5: Confirmation of the FPS activity of the Arabidopsis FPS2 isoform. A, functional complementation of the mutant yeast strain CC25 with plasmid pNCFPS2. Strain CC25 and strain CC25[pNCFPS2] were streaked onto YPD plates or YPD plates supplemented with 80 µg/ml ergosterol and incubated at 36 °C for 3 days. B, identification of the FPS reaction products in CC25, CC25[pNCFPS2], and NC1 strains. Cell-free extracts from each strain were incubated in the presence of [^14C]IPP and DMAPP. The reaction products obtained were analyzed by TLC after enzymatic hydrolysis. The radioactivity was detected only in the geraniol and farnesol fractions, and was measured as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' The amount of GPP and FPP produced is expressed as percentage with respect to the sum of counts in the geraniol and farnesol fractions, which was considered as 100%. Results are the average of three experiments. Variation between measurements was between 5 and 12%.



Because the FPS activity in CC25 strain is impaired in the condensation step of GPP with IPP to produce FPP, it was not possible to ascertain whether FPS2 could actually catalyze the two sequential reactions involved in the synthesis of FPP from IPP and DMAPP. To address this question, we checked whether plasmid pNCFPS2 also complemented a disrupted FPS gene. A haploid yeast strain bearing a disrupted FPS gene copy is not viable, even in the presence of ergosterol(26) . Haploid strain NC1, constructed as described under ``Experimental Procedures,'' having a disrupted copy of the yeast FPS and harboring plasmid pNCFPS2, showed a wild type phenotype whatever the growth conditions tested. When cell free extracts from strain NC1 were assayed for FPS activity the major reaction product was FPP (Fig. 5B). Strain NC1 also synthesized FPP when GPP was used instead of DMAPP as allylic primer (data not shown), thus confirming the ability of FPS to use either C(5) or C allylic primers. Taken together, these results unequivocally demonstrate that the Arabidopsis FPS2 cDNA encodes a functional FPS isoform which is able to catalyze the two successive condensations of IPP with both DMAPP and GPP leading to FPP formation.


DISCUSSION

The multibranched isoprenoid biosynthetic pathway in plants represents one of the most complex metabolic pathways known(1, 2) . One of the most challenging aspects of plant isoprenoid biosynthesis is the identification of the enzymes that catalyze the rate-limiting steps in the pathway. It is widely assumed that 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase, the enzyme that synthetizes mevalonic acid, plays a relevant role in the overall control of plant isoprenoid biosynthesis(3, 4, 5, 6, 7) . However, it is also accepted that mevalonic acid synthesis is not the only limiting step in isoprenoid biosynthesis, and that additional key enzymes are involved in the control of the flux through the pathway to maintain the appropriate cellular balance of isoprenoids under different physiological conditions(1) . FPS is considered to play a relevant role in the control of plant isoprenoid biosynthesis, since FPP is the starting point of different branched pathways leading to the synthesis of key isoprenoid end products. As a first step to study the role of FPS in the control of plant isoprenoid biosynthesis, we have undertaken the molecular characterization of FPS in A. thaliana.

The results presented here demonstrate that Arabidopsis contains a small FPS gene family consisting of at least two genes (FPS1 and FPS2) that encode closely similar FPS isoforms. The Arabidopsis FPS1 and FPS2 genes have been cloned and characterized. The two genes have a very similar organization with regard to intron positions and exons sizes, and share a high level of sequence similarity not only in the coding region but also in the intronic sequences. These observations indicate that these two genes have arisen from a recent duplication of an ancestral FPS gene. In spite of this, FPS1 and FPS2 have a different pattern of expression. By using gene-specific probes we have shown that, although the two genes are expressed in all the tissues analyzed, FPS1 mRNA is present mainly in roots and inflorescences, whereas FPS2 mRNA is detected at a lower level and accumulates preferentially in inflorescences. It is worth noting that the 3`-untranslated region of the Arabidopsis FPS2 transcript contains one copy of the AUUUA motif (position +1068 in the FPS2 cDNA sequence). This sequence has been shown to act as an mRNA instability determinant (for review, see (39) ). However, it remains to be determined whether this motif actually participates in modulating the Arabidopsis FPS2 transcript levels.

It has been previously shown that FPS1 is an active form of the enzyme (17) . At the protein level, Arabidopsis FPS1 and FPS2 are very similar (90.6% identity), with amino acid changes distributed throughout their sequence (Fig. 4). This suggested that FPS2 might represent an active form of the enzyme. This was demonstrated by the complementation of the mutant yeast strain CC25 with plasmid pNCFPS2, which carries the Arabidopsis FPS2 cDNA under the control of the yeast PGK promoter. Strain CC25 is auxotrophic for ergosterol at 36 °C since it carries the leaky mutation erg20-2 in the FPS gene that impairs the C to C elongation step. This results in a concomitant accumulation of GPP which is dephosphorylated by endogenous phosphatases and excreted to the growth medium as geraniol(26) . Strain CC25 was initially chosen because it allowed a rapid assay of the functionality of the FPS2. However, due to the nature of the erg20-2 mutation, it remained formally possible that the Arabidopsis FPS2 could catalyze the synthesis of FPP from IPP and GPP, but not the preceding condensation of IPP with DMAPP to form GPP. To rule out this possibility, we generated the haploid strain NC1, which has a disrupted copy of the FPS gene (erg20 mutation) and harbors plasmid pNCFPS2. It has been shown that the disruption of the FPS gene is lethal for yeast even in the presence of exogenously supplied ergosterol(26) . However, strain NC1 showed a wild type phenotype, thus indicating that plasmid pNCFPS2 encodes an enzyme which is able to catalyze the two successive condensations of IPP with both DMAPP and GPP leading to FPP formation. The presence of FPS activity was further confirmed by an in vitro assay using cell free extracts obtained from strain NC1.

In contrast to the controversy surrounding the subcellular location of the enzymes involved in the synthesis of IPP in plants, there is general agreement that the enzymes utilizing IPP are distributed in three subcellular compartments, namely cytosol, mitochondria, and plastids(1, 40) . The cytosol is the only cell compartment where plant FPS has been detected(1, 15, 40) . In animal cells, the major site of FPP synthesis is also the cytosol. However, it has recently been reported that in mammals FPS activity is also present in mitochondria (41) and peroxisomes(42) . This raises the question that in plants FPS might be present in cell compartments other than the cytosol. The alignment of the primary sequence of Arabidopsis FPS1 and FPS2 with that of the known FPS from other organisms (bacteria, fungi, plant, and animals) (19, 20) shows that the two Arabidopsis FPS isoforms lack amino-terminal extensions that could represent transit peptides to plastids and mitochondria. Furthermore, the N-terminal sequence of Arabidopsis FPS1 and FPS2 has no features of transit peptides for targeting into these organelles(43) . However, it cannot be ruled out that other forms of the enzyme, resulting from the use of alternative promoters or from alternative splicing processes, might be targeted to different subcellular locations. In addition, we cannot exclude that organellar forms of FPS could be encoded by additional genes not yet characterized.

One of the more intriguing findings arising out of the molecular biology studies of plant isoprenoid biosynthesis is the occurrence of gene families encoding key enzymes of this metabolic pathway. For example, the number of genes encoding 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase varies from the two genes described in Arabidopsis(44, 45) to at least 11 genes found in potato(5, 46) . At least five geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase genes have been reported to occur in Arabidopsis(47) . It has been described that vetispiradiene synthase, a sesquiterpene cyclase found in Hyosciamus muticus, is encoded by a gene family of six to eight members(48) . Our results indicate that Arabidopsis also contains a small FPS gene family consisting of at least two genes. Although the complexity of the FPS gene family in plants has only been studied in Arabidopsis, it is tempting to speculate that FPS gene families with similar or even greater complexity may also be found in other plant species. The occurrence of FPS isozymes raises the question about the role of each individual FPS isoform in the isoprenoid biosynthetic pathway. The differential expression of FPS1 and FPS2 might be indicative of an specialized function of each FPS isoform in directing the flux of pathway intermediates into specific isoprenoid end products. This assumption is consistent with the recent hypothesis proposing that specific classes of isoprenoids are synthesized by discrete metabolic channels within the pathway, through the formation of multienzyme complexes (metabolons), which are independently regulated(49, 50) . The results presented in this paper lend further support to the view that plant isoprenoid biosynthesis is a complex metabolic pathway which is regulated by sophisticated control mechanisms. We are currently applying different molecular and cellular approaches to identify the specific function of each FPS isoform in the organization of the plant isoprenoid pathway.


FOOTNOTES

*
This work was supported in part by Grants PB93-0753 from the Dirección General de Investigación Científica y Técnica and GRQ94-1034 from the Comissió Interdepartamental de Recerca i Innovació Tecnològica de la Generalitat de Catalunya (to A. B.), Grant 92T0352 from French Ministry of Research and Space (to F. K.), and Acción Integrada Hispano-Francesa HF94-019B (to A. F. and F. K.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBank(TM)/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) L46349[GenBank], L46350[GenBank], and L46367[GenBank].

§
Recipient of a predoctoral fellowship from the Direcció General de Recerca de la Generalitat de Catalunya.

Recipient of a predoctoral fellowship from the Conseil Régional du Poitou-Charentes.

**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Unitat de Bioquímica, Facultat de Farmàcia, Avda. Diagonal 643, 08028-Barcelona, Spain. Tel.: 34-3-4024522; Fax: 34-3-4021896; aferrer{at}farmacia.far.ub.es.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: IPP, isopentenyl diphosphate; FPS, farnesyl-diphosphate synthase; FPP, farnesyl diphosphate; DMAPP, dimethylallyl diphosphate; GPP, geranyl diphosphate; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA ends; bp, base pair(s).


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. A. Bachmair for the genomic library and Robin Rycroft for editorial help.


REFERENCES

  1. Gray, J. C. (1987) Adv. Bot. Res. 14, 25-91
  2. Bach, T. J. (1987) Plant Physiol. Biochem. 25, 163-178
  3. Bach, T. J., Wettstein, A., Boronat, A., Ferrer, A., Enjuto, M., Gruissem, W., and Narita, J. O. (1991) in Physiology and Biochemistry of Plant Sterols (Patterson, G. W., and Nes, W. D., eds) pp. 29-49, American Oils Chemical Society, Champaign, IL
  4. Bach, T. J., Boronat, A., Caelles, C., Ferrer, A., Weber, T., and Wettstein, A. (1991) Lipids 26, 637-648 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Stermer, B. A., Bianchini, G., and Korth, K. L. (1994) J. Lipid Res. 35, 1133-1140 [Abstract]
  6. Bach, T. J. (1995) Lipids 30, 191-201 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Weissenborn, D. L., Denbow, C. J., Laine, M., Lang, S. S., Yang, Z., Yu, X., and Cramer, C. (1995) Physiol. Plant. 93, 393-400 [CrossRef]
  8. Poulter, C. D., and Rilling, H. C. (1981) in Biosynthesis of Isoprenoid Compounds (Porter, J. W., and Spurgeon, S. L., eds) pp. 161-282, John Wiley & Sons, New York
  9. Clarke, S. (1992) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 61, 355-386 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Casey, P. J. (1992) J. Lipid Res. 33, 1731-1740 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Clarke, C. F., Tanaka, R. D., Svenson, K., Wamsley, M., Fogelman, A. M., and Edwards, P. A. (1987) Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 3138-3146 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Rosser, D. S., Ashby, M. N., Ellis, J. L., and Edwards, P. A. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 12653-12656 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Wilkin, D. J., Kutsunai, S. Y., and Edwards, P. A. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 4607-4614 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Spear, D. H., Kutsunai, S. Y., Correll, C. C., and Edwards, P. E. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 20, 14462-14469
  15. Hugueney, P., and Camara, B. (1990) FEBS Lett. 273, 235-238 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Gershenzon, J., and Croteau, R. (1990) Rec. Adv. Phytochem. 24, 99-160
  17. Delourme, D., Lacroute, F., and Karst, F. (1994) Plant Mol. Biol. 26, 1867-1873 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Attucci, S., Aitken, S. M., Ibrahim, R. K., and Gulick, P. J. (1995) Plant Physiol. 108, 835-836 [Free Full Text]
  19. Attucci, S., Aitken, S. M., Gulick, P. J., and Ibrahim, R. K. (1995) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 321, 493-500 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Chen, A., Kroon, P. A., and Poulter, C. D. (1994) Protein Sci. 3, 600-607 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Koike-Takeshita, A., Koyama, T., Obata, S., and Ogura, K. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 18396-18400 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Marrero, P. F., Poulter, C. D., and Edwards, P. A. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 21873-21878 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Joly, A., and Edwards, P. A. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 26983-26989 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Somerville, C. R., and Ogreen, W. L. (1982) in Methods in Chloroplast Molecular Biology (Edelman, M. K., Hallick, R. B., and Chua, N. H., eds) pp. 129-138, Elsevier Biomedical, New York
  25. Chambon, C., Ladeveze, V., Oulmouden, A., Servouze, M., and Karst, F. (1990) Curr. Genet. 18, 41-46 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Blanchard, L., and Karst, F. (1993) Gene (Amst.) 125, 185-189
  27. Minet, M., Dufour, M. E., and Lacroute, F. (1992) Plant J. 2, 417-422 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Gietz, R. D., St. Jean, A., Woods, R. A., and Schiestl, R. H. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 1425 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Feinberg, A. P., and Vogelstein, B. (1983) Anal. Biochem. 132, 6-13 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Sanger, F., Nicklen, S., and Coulson, A. R. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 74, 5463-5467 [Abstract]
  31. Dellaporta, S. L., Wood, J., and Hicks, J. B. (1984) in Molecular Biology of Plants: A Laboratory Manual , pp. 36-37, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York
  32. Dean, L., Elzen, B., Tamaki, S., Dunsmuir, P., and Bedbrook, J. (1985) EMBO J. 5, 3055-3061
  33. Gerlach, W. L., and Bedbrook, J. R. (1979) Nucleic Acids Res. 7, 1869-1885 [Abstract]
  34. Frohman, M. A., Dush, M. K., and Martin, G. R. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 8998-9002 [Abstract]
  35. Muehlbacher, M., and Poulter, C. D. (1988) Biochemistry 27, 7315-7328 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Breathnach, R., and Chambon, P. (1981) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 50, 349-383 19176-19184 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Kozak, M. (1984) Nucleic Acids Res. 12, 857-872 [Abstract]
  38. Lütcke, H. A., Chow, K. C., Mickel, F. S., Moss, K. A., Kern, H. F., and Scheele, G. A. (1987) EMBO J. 6, 43-48 [Abstract]
  39. Sullivan, M. L., and Green, P. J. (1993) Plant. Mol. Biol. 23, 1091-1104 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Kleinig, H. (1989) Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 40, 39-59 [CrossRef]
  41. Runquist, M., Ericsson, J., Thelin, A., Chojnacki, T., and Dallner, G. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 5804-5809 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Ericsson, J., Applkvist, E. L., Thelin, A., Chojnacki, T., and Dallner, G. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 18707-18714
  43. von Heijne, G. (1992) Genet. Eng. 14, 1-11
  44. Caelles, C., Ferrer, A., Balcells, L., Hegardt, F. G., and Boronat, A. (1989) Plant Mol. Biol. 13, 627-638 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Enjuto, M., Balcells, L., Campos, N., Caelles, C., Arró, M., and Boronat, A. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 927-931 [Abstract]
  46. Bhattacharyya, M. K., Paiva, N. L., Dixon, R. A., Korth, K. L., and Stermer, B. A. (1995) Plant. Mol. Biol. 28, 1-15 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Bartley, G. E., and Scolnick, P. A. (1995) Plant Cell 7, 1027-1038 [Free Full Text]
  48. Back, K., and Chappell, J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 7375-7381 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Chappell, J. (1995) Plant Physiol. 107, 1-6 [Free Full Text]
  50. Chappell, J. (1995) Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 46, 521-547 [CrossRef]

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.