©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Alternate Strand DNA Triple Helix-mediated Inhibition of HIV-1 U5 Long Terminal Repeat Integration in Vitro(*)

(Received for publication, October 23, 1995; and in revised form, January 10, 1996)

Mohammed Bouziane Dmitry I. Cherny (§) Jean-François Mouscadet Christian Auclair (¶)

From the Laboratoire de Physicochimie et Pharmacologie des Macromolécules Biologiques CNRS URA 147, Institut Gustave Roussy, Rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, France

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

Integration of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) DNA into the host genome is an obligatory process in the replicative life cycle of the virus. This event is mediated in vitro by integrase, a viral protein which binds to specific sequences located on both extremities of the DNA long terminal repeats (LTRs). These sites are highly conserved in all HIV genomes and thus provide potential targets for the selective inhibition of integration. The integrase-binding site located on the HIV-1 U5 LTR end contains two adjacent purine tracts on opposite strands, 5` . . . GGAAAATCTCT-3`/3`-CCTTTTAGAGA . . . 5`, in parallel orientations. A single strand oligonucleotide 5`-GGTTTTTGTGT-3` was designed to associate with these tracts via its ability to form a continuous alternate strand DNA triplex. Under neutral pH and physiological temperature, the oligonucleotide, tagged with an intercalator chromophore oxazolopyridocarbazole, formed a stable triplex with the target DNA. The occurrence of this unusual triplex was demonstrated by both DNase I footprinting and electron microscopy. The triplex inhibits the two steps of the integrase-mediated reactions, namely, the endonucleolytic cleavage of the dinucleotide 5`-GT-3` from the 3` end of the integration substrate and the integration of the substrate into the heterologous target DNA. The midpoints for both inhibition reactions were observed at oligonucleotide concentrations of 50-100 nM. We believe that these results open new possibilities for the specific targeting of viral DNA LTR ends with the view of inhibiting integration under physiological conditions.


INTRODUCTION

The integration of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (^1)genome into the host genome is mediated by the viral protein integrase (IN)(1) . After the reverse transcription of the HIV genomic RNA, two reactions occur, catalyzed by the viral IN enzyme, a site-specific removal of two nucleotides (5`-GT-3`) from the 3` ends of the long terminal repeats (LTR) of the viral DNA and the integration of the recessed viral DNA into the host genome(2, 3) . Efficient methods have been reported to investigate integrase activity by analyzing the in vitro reaction products(4) , and several families of compounds that inhibit integrase activity have now been identified(5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13) . However, none of them displayed a strong and/or selective inhibitory effect. Our approach toward obtaining more potent inhibitors involves the targeting of the LTR extremities that contain the cis-acting sequences required for a correct integration, further shown to be binding sites for integrase(14) . These sequences can be considered as a potential target for the selective inhibition of integration by double-stranded DNA binding ligands. Depending on the sequence context, selective recognition of double-stranded DNA can be chiefly achieved either with minor groove-binding oligopeptides or with triple helix-forming oligonucleotides(15) . For instance, we previously demonstrated that the minor groove binder netropsin selectively binds to an (A + T)-rich sequence located in the MMLV LTR end and consequently inhibits the in vitro integration process(9) . Furthermore, a derivative of netropsin was capable of blocking early steps of MMLV replication in vivo, most likely by interfering with integration of proviral DNA(16) . Recently, we have extended this approach to HIV. The HIV U3 LTR end contains a short purine-pyrimidine which could be selectively targeted by a purine 7-mer triple helix-forming oligonucleotide coupled to the intercalating chromophore oxazolopyridocarbazole (OPC)(10, 17) . However, theoretical considerations indicate that 7-mer oligonucleotides are only poorly selective, thus preventing the use of too short TFOs for in vivo experiments(18, 19) . To overcome this limitation, it was necessary to increase the length of the target sequence. We noticed that the IN-binding site located near the U5 LTR HIV-1 end contains two adjacent purine tracts oriented in parallel on opposite DNA strands, i.e. 5`-GGAAAATCTCT-3`/3`CCTTTTAGAGA-5`. Theoretical (20) and experimental data (21, 22) have pointed out that TFO with natural 5`-3` phosphodiester bonds can recognize the two alternate purine tracts simultaneously by switching from one strand to the other and thus providing alternating triplexes of opposite polarities, parallel and antiparallel ones(20) .

The present work shows that a 11-mer oligonucleotide-intercalator conjugate (OPC linked to the 5`-end of 5`-GGTTTTTGTGT-3`) (i) readily forms a stable triplex with a DNA fragment containing the U5 LTR end sequence at neutral pH and physiological temperature and (ii) selectively inhibits the IN-catalyzed integration of the U5 LTR end into heterologous DNA in vitro. The formation of this unusual triplex is demonstrated by both footprinting assay and electron microscopy.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Synthesis of TFO-OPC

Oligonucleotides were synthesized on Applied Biosystems model 381A DNA synthesizer. For modified oligonucleotides, the 5` linker was obtained with the amino link 2 phosphoramidite base. The OPC-derived oligonucleotides were prepared essentially as described by Gautier et al.(23) . Briefly, peroxidase was added to a solution of the oligonucleotide linker and 2-methyl-9-hydroxyellipticinium acetate in 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, in the presence of 20 mM hydrogen peroxide(24) . Conjugates were purified by denaturing gel electrophoresis, visualized by UV shadowing and direct fluorescence of the OPC. The oligos were desalted by chromatography on the Sephadex G-10 phase. The concencentration of conjugates was determined spectrophotometrically.

Footprinting Experiments

A 0.1-µg portion of the 42-mer oligonucleotide 5`-AGAATTAGCCCTTCCAGTACTGCTAGAGATTTTCCACACGAT-3` was labeled by polynucleotide kinase and annealed to the complementary strand in 40 µl in order to obtain target DNA. DNase I footprinting was performed in a buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, 5 mM MgCl(2), 2 mM MnCl(2), 0.5 mM spermine, target DNA (10 nM), and additional nonspecific unlabeled DNA (60 ng). In the standard assay, TFO-OPC was added to the reaction mixture at different concentrations (see figure legends), and the mixture was incubated at 30 °C for 30 min. Digestion was started by addition of DNase I (3 units/ml) and stopped after 2 min by adding EDTA (10 mM), sodium acetate (0.3 M), and carrier tRNA (5 µg). Products of the reaction were subsequently precipitated with ethanol, dried, and resuspended in formamide/EDTA gel-loading buffer. The cleavage products were loaded on 18% denaturing gel and visualized by autoradiography.

Oligonucleotide Sequencing

Modified Maxam-Gilbert sequencing reactions were used to generate G, (G + A), and T ladders of end-labeled DNA(25) . For G reactions, 9 µl of end-labeled DNA in TE buffer were incubated for 10 min at room temperature with 1 µl of 1/100 dimethyl sulfate in water. For the (G + A) reaction, 9 µl of labeled DNA in TE buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA) were mixed with 1 µl of 1 M piperidine formate (pH 2.0) and incubated for 5 min at 65 °C. For T reactions, 9 µl of labeled DNA were heated at 90 °C for 2 min, cooled quickly to room temperature, mixed with 1 µl of 3 mM KMnO(4), and incubated further for 7 min at room temperature. The reaction was finally quenched with 1 µl of allyl alcohol. Then all three mixtures were treated for 15 min with 1 M pyrrolidine at 90 °C, dried, and resuspended in formamide/EDTA gel-loading buffer.

HIV-1 LTRs Integration Reaction

Double-stranded oligonucleotides were used as HIV-1 DNA substrates for the integration assay. Sequences (21-mer) corresponding to the U3 and U5 LTR ends were 5`-GAGTGAATTAGCCCTTCCAGT-3` and 5`-GTGTGGAAAATCTCTAGCAGT-3`, respectively. They were 5`-labeled by polynucleotide kinase and annealed to their unlabeled complementary strands thus giving the desired substrates (called LTR U3 and LTR U5, respectively). For the integration reactions, LTR U3-GT and LTR U5-GT (LTR U3 and LTR U5 lacking the terminal dinucleotides 5`-GT-3`, respectively) were used as substrates. HIV-1 IN was expressed in Escherichia coli BL21. The bacterial strain carrying the expression vector was kindly provided by Dr. Craigie (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD), and purified as described previously(26) . Protein purity was checked by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and the concentration was determined spectrophotometrically. HIV-1 LTR integration was quantified as described previously(26) . Briefly, standard assay medium for the integration into the pSP65 vector composed of 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.0, 10 mM MnCl(2), 10 mM dithiothreitol, 10% glycerol, 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (integration buffer), and 15 ng of pSP65 plasmid DNA. TFO-OPC was first incubated for 30 min at 30 °C with LTR U3-GT or LTR U5-GT substrate (10 nM) under the same conditions used for the reaction of footprinting. 1 µl of this mixture was then added to 4 µl of the integration buffer, and the reaction was started by the addition of 5 pmol of HIV-1 IN. Incubation was continued for 40 min at 30 °C. The reaction was stopped by adding 10 mM EDTA, 10% SDS, and 0.03% glycerol. The products were separated on 1.2% agarose gel and visualized by autoradiography.

Cleavage Reaction

TFO-OPC conjugates were mixed with LTR U3 or LTR U5 substrate (10 nM) under the same conditions used for the integration reaction. The reaction was stopped by adding 10 mM EDTA and formamide. Cleavage products were subjected to electrophoresis in 18% denaturing polyacrylamide gel and visualized by autoradiography. Autoradiographs from the cleavage reaction experiments were analyzed using a Bio-Profil (Vilber Lourmat) microdensitometer. For each band corresponding to cleavage products, we calculated the fraction F = I/I(0), corresponding to the relative inhibition, where I is the integrated volume of the cleavage product in the presence of increasing concentration of HIVS-OPC and I(0) the value of the same band without conjugate. Relative inhibition was plotted versus HIVS-OPC concentration, and data were fitted using a nonlinear least-squares fitting procedure of INPLOT4 software. Midpoint of integration efficiency was calculated for F = 0.5, determined in the best fit.

Electron Microscopy

3`-Biotinylated oligonucleotide bio-3`-GGTTTTTGTGT-5`-NH(2) was purchased from Eurogentec and conjugated with OPC as described elsewhere(23) . pU5 HIV plasmid DNA carrying the U5 LTR end was obtained by the following method. A 42-mer target used for footprinting experiments was modified by addition terminal nucleotides in order to obtain EcoRI and HindIII cleaved ends and cloned into EcoRI-HindIII sites of the pSP65 vector. For electron microscopy, a procedure similar to that described in Cherny et al.(27) was used. 0.2 µg of pU5/NheI plasmid DNA was incubated in a 10-µl volume with bio-oligo at room temperature for 1 h in a buffer containing 10 mM Tris-acetate, pH 7.2, 20 mM sodium acetate, 5 mM MgAc(2), 5 mM MnCl(2), 0.1 mM spermine. The final concentration of oligonucleotide was 1 µM. After incubation, the mixture was passed through the Superose 6 column equilibrated with 10 mM Tris-acetate, pH 7.2, 20 mM sodium acetate, 10 mM MgCl(2). The DNA-containing fractions were collected and streptavidin (Sigma) was added to a final concentration of 5-20 µg/ml (80-300 nM). After a 10-min incubation at room temperature, the gel filtration step was repeated. A 5-µl aliquot was then applied to a carbon film glow discharged in the presence of pentylamine vapors according to Dubochet et al.(28) , stained with 0.5-1% aqueous solution of uranyl acetate, and rotary shadowed with tantalum/tungsten with an electron gun of a Balzers MED 010 apparatus. The samples were observed with a Zeiss CEM-902 electron microscope in the annular dark-field mode according to Delain et al.(29, 30) . Image recording and length measurements of DNA molecules were performed with the built-in Kontron image analyzer system and software.


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Formation of a triple helix by oligonucleotides in a sequence-specific manner is limited to polypurine tracts of duplex DNA. Recent theoretical and experimental work has demonstrated the ability of oligonucleotides to bind to oligopurine sequences which alternate on the strands of duplex DNA(15, 20, 21, 22, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37) . Three different types of alternate triple helix-forming oligonucleotides have been described: (i) two pyrimidine oligonucleotides can be linked either by their 3` or by their 5` ends to allow the recognition of alternating polypurine sequences(31, 32) ; (ii) a purine oligonucleotide that binds in antiparallel orientation can be linked to a pyrimidine oligonucleotide which binds in an opposite orientation with respect to the oligopurine target(33, 34, 35, 36, 37) ; and (iii) a single (T/G)-containing oligonucleotide can interact with two oligopurine tracts that alternate on both strands of the target DNA. Indeed, (G/T)-containing oligonucleotides may adopt either a parallel or an antiparallel orientation with respect to the oligopurine target depending upon the sequence considered and, in particular, the number of 5`-GpT-3` and 5`-TpG-3` steps present in the sequence(38) . We adopted the third strategy and synthesized an 11-mer oligonucleotide 5`-GGTTTTTGTGT-3` designed in order to create a stable alternate strand DNA triplex with the 5`-GGAAAATCTCT-3` motif located at the extremity of the HIV-1 U5 LTR (Fig. 1). It was assumed that this oligonucleotide will form two mini triple helices, the first one involves antiparallel binding of the third strand to the 5`-AGAGA-3` motif (referred as antiparallel domain), and the second involves parallel binding to the 5`-GGAAAA-3` motif (referred as parallel domain) of the LTR extremity (Fig. 1B). Despite the fact that the parallel mini helix contains GGC triplets in a noncanonical orientation, the orientation of the third strand was chosen to be consistent with empirical rules for design of the (G/T)-containing third strand(38) . According to these rules, two parameters were taken into consideration for the stability of these mini helices: (i) there is only one GpT step in the 5`-GGTTTT motif and (ii) more than 50% of the putative mini triple helix is composed of TAT triplets. Initial results indicated that the association of the oligonucleotide alone with the DNA target resulted in the formation of a triple helix. The complex, however, was poorly stable even after an overnight incubation at 4 °C. In order to increase the stability of the triple helix, the oligonucleotide was conjugated with the intercalating chromophore OPC. The resulting compound, termed HIVS-OPC, is shown in Fig. 1A. As a control, an alternative 5`-GGTTTTGGTTT-3` oligonucleotide was also conjugated to OPC (termed HIVT-OPC, Fig. 1A) to be used for its inability to form a stable triplex with the U5 LTR.


Figure 1: Structure of triple helix-forming oligonucleotides conjugated with OPC and schematic presentation of the triplex. A, HIVS-OPC is a oligonucleotide conjugate whose binding oligopurine-oligopyrimidine sequence is located in the U5 LTR HIV-1 end region. HIVT-OPC was synthesized to serve as a control conjugate. B, schematic representation of the alternate strand DNA triplex formed between HIVS-OPC and the target sequence.



The ability of the HIVS-OPC conjugate to bind to double-stranded DNA via the formation of a triple helix has been initially examined by gel-retardation experiments (data not shown). Results from a 21-mer LTR U5 substrate provided evidence for the formation of a stable complex between the partners. These were confirmed by DNase I footprinting using a labeled 42-mer target at different HIVS-OPC concentrations (Fig. 2). The footprinting experiments were performed on the two strands of the DNA target. These were involved in the formation of either antiparallel or parallel triplets. The results are presented on Fig. 2, A and B, respectively. The antiparallel domain which interacts with the 3`-end of HIVS-OPC was fully protected for concentrations of HIVS-OPC above 100 nM. The protection spanned over the entire length of the target sequence and extended to the parallel domain (Fig. 2A). Simultaneously, the second strand was itself also protected over the whole length of both domains in the same range of the concentrations of HIVS-OPC (Fig. 2B). Control experiments were performed with conjugate HIVT-OPC. This oligonucleotide contained the intact parallel binding domain but was scrambled within the antiparallel binding domain (see Fig. 1) so that two mismatched triplets would be formed at positions 7 and 10 (from the 5` end) upon its binding to the target. Actually no protection was observed even at micromolar concentrations (data not shown). Taken together, these results provided strong evidence for the necessity of simultaneous binding of the (G/T)-containing oligonucleotide-OPC conjugate to both target domains in order to give rise to a stable triple-helix complex. It is worthy to note that (G/T)-containing conjugate HIVS-OPC was not optimized for the junction step. In particular, the oligonucleotidic moiety was not deleted at the junction to accommodate crossing of the major groove as suggested by Beal and Dervan(33) . This alteration appears therefore dispensable in the context of (G/T) oligonucleotides. However, we cannot rule out that a punctual deletion at the junction may improve the overall stability of the triple helical complex.


Figure 2: DNase I footprinting of a 42-base pair fragment in the presence of HIVS-OPC. A, protection of the oligonucleotide containing 5`-AGAGATTTT-3` site as a function of HIVS-OPC concentration. B, protection of the complementary strand as a function of HIVS-OPC concentration. Lanes 1, 2, and 3, G, (G + A), and T ladders, respectively; lanes 4-9, decreasing concentrations of HIVS-OPC from 2 µM to 10 nM, respectively; lane 10, control of digestion; lane 11, the target fragment only.



In parallel, we used electron microscopy to detect and localize the binding of the HIVS-OPC conjugate on its target DNA sequence. Previously, this technique has been applied successfully to detect triplexes formed between DNA and either biotinylated TFO or peptide nucleic acid oligomers with streptavidin used as a label; triplexes are visualized readily as streptavidin beads on DNA molecules(27, 39, 40) . The electron micrographs presented in Fig. 3were obtained with the 3`-biotinylated HIVS-OPC conjugate and plasmid DNA containing a cloned U5 copy of the terminal sequences. They confirm the formation of a highly specific and selective complex, located 263 bp from the nearest end of DNA. This coincides well within experimental error (21 bp) with the position of the target sequence 273-283 bp from the same end of DNA molecule.


Figure 3: Electron microscopy visualization of the triplex. The sites of triplex formation are seen as beads corresponding to the streptavidin molecules (see C). A, micrographs of the complexes bio-3`-GGTTTTTGTGT-5`-OPC-pU5/NheI plasmid DNA-streptavidin. The arrows indicate the streptavidin molecules. Micrographs were taken in a annular dark-field mode on rotary-shadowed molecules. B, histogram of the distribution of bound streptavidin on 49 DNA molecules. The position of the peak center is 263 bp from the nearest end. The arrow indicates the position of the U5 LTR target site. C, schematic illustrating our approach.



To demonstrate that the oligonucleotide-OPC conjugate could inhibit the processing and integration of the U5 LTR, we applied a quantitative assay as described previously(17) . The assay involves synthetic double-stranded oligonucleotide which match one of the HIV-1 LTR extremities as the strand transfer substrate and a heterologous plasmid DNA as a target substrate. It concerns the first step of integration, namely, endonucleolytic cleavage, where integrase removes the dinucleotide 5`-GT-3` from the 3` end of LTR U5 (Fig. 4A, lane 9). Increasing the HIVS-OPC concentration from 10 nM to 2 µM in the reaction mixture resulted in a notable inhibition of the endonucleolytic cleavage (Fig. 4A, lanes 1-8). In contrast, the control oligonucleotide HIVT-OPC, even at high concentrations, had no effect on this activity (Fig. 4B). As expected, the LTR U3 substrate was normally processed by integrase (Fig. 5A, lane 9) in the presence of either HIVS-OPC or HIVT-OPC, thus reflecting the absence of triplex formation with this segment of DNA (Fig. 5, A and B, respectively).


Figure 4: Effect of oligonucleotide conjugates HIVS-OPC and HIVT-OPC on the IN-mediated nucleolytic cleavage of LTR U5 substrate under the standard conditions (see ``Materials and Methods''). The reaction products were electrophoresed in a 18% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. The positions of the labeled strand of DNA substrates (21-mer) and the nucleolytic cleavage products (19-mer) are indicated. A, LTR U5 cleavage was tested in the presence of decreasing concentrations of HIVS-OPC. Lanes 1-8, decreasing concentrations of HIVS-OPC from 2 µM to 10 nM, respectively; lane 9, cleavage without HIVS-OPC. B, the same assay was performed using LTR U5 cleavage in the presence of decreasing concentrations of HIVT-OPC; lane 10, control without HIVT-OPC and without integrase.




Figure 5: Effect of oligonucleotide conjugates HIVS-OPC and HIVT-OPC on the IN-mediated nucleolytic cleavage of LTR U3 substrate. The positions of the longer strand transfer (autointegration) are indicated. A, LTR U3 cleavage was tested in the presence of decreasing concentrations of HIVS-OPC. Lanes 1-8, decreasing concentrations of HIVS-OPC from 2 µM to 10 nM, respectively; lane 9, cleavage without HIVS-OPC. B, the same assay was performed using LTR U3 cleavage in the presence of decreasing concentrations of HIVT-OPC; lane 10, control without HIVT-OPC and without integrase.



To further evaluate the influence of HIVS-OPC and HIVT-OPC on integration, the LTR U5-GT and LTR U3-GT oligonucleotides were used as substrates and the pSP65 vector as a target DNA. In the absence of the TFO conjugate, integrase yielded an integration of about 20% for U5-GT and of 5-10% for U3-GT, consistent with a previous report(41) . Adding HIVS-OPC into the integration mixture resulted in a strong inhibition of the reaction with a midpoint of integration efficiency corresponding to 60 nM HIVS-OPC (Fig. 6A). Noteworthy, the midpoint of inhibition for the endonucleolytic cleavage occurred at the same range of HIVS-OPC concentrations (Fig. 4A, lanes 5-8). With the control HIVT-OPC, the integration processed normally at any concentration tested (Fig. 6B). As expected, neither HIVS-OPC nor HIVT-OPC had a visible effect on the integration of LTR U3-GT into plasmid DNA (Fig. 7).


Figure 6: Specific inhibition of LTR U5-GT integration in the presence of oligonucleotides conjugates HIVS-OPC and HIVT-OPC. A, specific inhibition of LTR U5-GT integration in the presence of decreasing concentrations of HIVS-OPC. Lanes 1-6, decreasing concentrations of HIVS-OPC from 2 µM to 50 nM, respectively; lane 7, control without HIVS-OPC and without integrase; lane 8, control without HIVS-OPC. B, the same assay was performed using LTR U5-GT integration in the presence of decreasing concentrations of HIVT-OPC.




Figure 7: Lack of the effect of the oligonucleotide conjugates HIVS-OPC and HIVT-OPC on LTR U3-GT integration. A, LTR U3-GT integration in the presence of decreasing concentrations of HIVS-OPC. Lanes 1-6, decreasing concentrations of HIVS-OPC from 2 µM to 50 nM, respectively; lane 7, control without HIVS-OPC and without integrase; lane 8, control without HIVS-OPC. B, the same assay was performed using LTR U3-GT integration in the presence of decreasing concentrations of HIVT-OPC.



The results presented here clearly demonstrate through two independent methods the occurrence of an alternate strand DNA triplex near the integrase-binding site of the U5 LTR HIV-1 end. Our DNase I footprinting experiments show that binding of the designed oligonucleotide to a 42-mer target sequence results in the formation of a triplex that is stable at neutral pH and physiological temperature. Electron micrographic data, obtained with the same target DNA cloned within a plasmid DNA, confirm the high selectivity of the triplex formation as an uniquely positioned complex over the whole sequence of plasmid DNA. The inhibitory effect of the triplex formation was proven through the inhibition of the two HIV-1 integrase-mediated reactions, namely, the endonucleolytic cleavage of the substrate and its subsequent integration into the heterologous DNA. This inhibition was observed at relatively low concentrations of HIVS-OPC (50-100 nM) probably due to the beneficial influence of the 5`-end-conjugated intercalator chromophore.

Together with our previous findings on the in vitro inhibition of U3 LTR HIV-1 end integration via a canonical triplex, this work extends of the range of possible targets on HIV DNA. It may also constitute a new basis for a pharmacological strategy against the propagation of AIDS.


FOOTNOTES

*
This work was supported by the Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA Antiviral Research Program, Association Pour la Recherche sur le Cancer Grant 2040, by Institut de Formation Supérieur Biomedical (I.F.S.B.M.), and Programme of Internationale Scientific Cooperation Programme Internationale de Cooporation Scientifique N 227. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
Permanent address: Institute of Molecular Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Kurchatov's Square, 123182 Moscow, Russia.

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 331-45596435; Fax: 331-45594848.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; LTR, long terminal repeat; IN, integrase; TFO, triple helix-forming oligonucleotide; OPC, oxazolopyridocarbazole; MMLV, Moloney murine leukemia virus; bp, base pair(s).


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

M. B. thanks Dr. Serge Fermandjian for manuscript preparation, Eliane Franque for skillful technical assistance, and Frédérique Subra and Pascale Bouillé for helpful discussions. D. I. C. thanks Dr. E. Delain for his help and encouragement in this work.


REFERENCES

  1. Brown, P. O. (1990) Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 157, 19-48 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Brown, P. O., Bowerman, B., Varmus, H. E., and Bishop, J. M. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 2525-2529 [Abstract]
  3. Craigie, R., Mizuuchi, K., Bushman, F. D., and Engelman, A. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 2729-2734 [Abstract]
  4. Sherman, P. A, and Fyfe, J. A. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad Sci.. U. S. A. 87, 5119-5123 [Abstract]
  5. Cushman, M., and Sherman, P. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 185, 85-90 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Fesen, M. R., Kohn, W. K., Leteurtre, F., and Pommier, Y. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 2399-2403 [Abstract]
  7. Carteau, S., Mouscadet, J. F., Goulaouic, H., Subra, F., and Auclair, C. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 192, 1409-1414 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Carteau, S., Mouscadet, J. F., Goulaouic, H., Subra, F., and Auclair, C. (1993) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 305, 606-610 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Carteau, S., Mouscadet, J. F., Goulaouic, H., Subra, F., and Auclair, C. (1994) Biochem. Pharmacol. 47, 1821-1826 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Mouscadet, J. F., Carteau, S., Goulaouic, H., Subra, F., and Auclair, C. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 34, 21635-21638
  11. Cushman, M., Golebiewski, W. M., Pommier, Y., Mazumder, A., Reymen, D., De Clercq, E., Graham, L., and Rice, W. G. (1995) J. Med. Chem. 38, 443-452 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Mazumder, A., Gupta, M., Perrin, D. M., Sigman, D. S., Rabinovitz, M., and Pommier, Y. (1995) AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 11, 115-125 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. LaFemina, R. L., Graham, P. L., LeGrow, K., Hastings, J. C., Wolfe, A., Young, S. D., Emini, E. A., and Hazuda, D. J. (1995) Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39, 320-324 [Abstract]
  14. Sherman, P. A., Dickson, M. L., and Fyfe, J. A. (1992) J. Virol. 66, 3593-3601 [Abstract]
  15. Thuong, N. T., and Helene, C. (1993) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 32, 666-690
  16. Subra, F., Mouscadet, J. F., Lavignon, M., Roy, C., and Auclair, C. (1993) Biochem. Pharmacol. 45, 93-99 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Mouscadet, J. F., Ketterlé, C., Goulaouic, H, Carteau, S., Subra, F., Le Bret, M., and Auclair, C. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 4187-4196 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Cazenave, C., and H é l è ne, C. (1991) Antisense Nucleic Acids and Proteins , pp. 47-93, Marcel Dekker, New York
  19. Ts'o, P. O. P. (1992) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1, 159-177
  20. Sun, J.-S. (1995) in Modelling of Biomolecular Structures and Mechanisms (Pullman, A., ed) pp. 267-288, Kluwer Academic Publishers, the Netherlands
  21. Washbrook, E., and Fox, K. R. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 3977-3982
  22. Washbrook, E., and Fox, K. R. (1994) Biochem. J. 301, 569-575 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Gautier, C., Morvan, F., Rayner, B., Huynh-Dinh, T., Igolen, J., Imbach, J.-L., Paoletti, C., and Paoletti, J. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 6625-6641 [Abstract]
  24. Auclair, C., Voisin, E., Banoun, H., Paoletti, C., Bernadou, J., and Meunier, B. (1984) J. Med. Chem. 27, 1161-1166 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Williamson, J. R., and Celander, D. W. (1990) Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 379 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Carteau, S., Mouscadet, J. F., Goulaouic, H, Subra, F., and Auclair, C. (1993) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 300, 756-760 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Cherny, D. I., Malkov, V. A., Volodin, A. A., and Frank-Kamenetskii, M. D. (1993) J. Mol. Biol. 230, 2, 379-383
  28. Dubochet, J., Ducommun, M., Zollinger, M., and Kellenberger, E. (1971) J. Ultrastruct. Res. 35, 147-167 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Delain, E., Fourcade, A., Revet, B., and Mory, C. (1992) Microsc. Microanal. Microstruct. 3, 175-186
  30. Delain, E., and Le Cam, E. (1995) in Visualisation of Nucleic Acids (Morel, G., ed) pp. 35-56, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
  31. Horne, D. A., and Dervan, P. B. (1990) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112, 2435-2437
  32. Ono, A., Chen, C. N., and Kan, L. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 9914-9921 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Beal, P. A., and Dervan, P. B. (1992) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 4979-4982
  34. Jayasena, S. D., and Johnston, B. H. (1992) Biochemistry, 31, 320-327 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Jayasena, S. D., and Johnston, B. H. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 5279-5288 [Abstract]
  36. Jayasena, S. D., and Johnston, B. H. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 2800-2807 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Olivas, W. M., and Maher, L. J., III (1994) Biochemistry 33, 983-991 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Sun, J. S., de Bizemont, T., Duval-Valentin, G, Montenay-Garestier, T., and Hélène, C. (1991) C. R. Acad. Sci. Ser. III 313, 585-590 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Cherny, D. I., Kurakin, A. V., Lyamichev, V. N., Frank-Kamenetskii, M. D., Zinkevich, V. E., Firman, K., Egholm, M., Burchardt, O., Berg, R. H., and Nielsen, P. E. (1994) J. Mol. Recognit. 7, 171-176 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Demidov, V. V., Cherny, D. I., Kurakin, A. V., Yavnilovich, M. V., Malkov, V. A., Frank-Kamenetskii, M. D., Sonnichsen, S. H., and Nielsen, P. E. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 5218-5222 [Abstract]
  41. Vincent, K. A., Ellison, V., Chow, S. A., and Brown, P. O. (1993) J. Virol. 67, 425-437 [Abstract]

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.